Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
16-105952
DESIGNZu To: Leila Willoughby-Oe Company: City of Federal Way GDI Project: RE: FederalWay-3-01 Yoon Bulkhead File#15-102033-AD Memorandum From: Kevin Lamb, P.E. Date: July 21 , 2017 Page 1 I reviewed the GeoResources' letter titled "Final Letter - Shoreline Improvements, 31008 391h Place SW, Federal Way, Washington, PN:7582000070", and dated July 17, 2017. The report summarizes the mitigation of the MSE bulkhead wall that had been illegally constructed on the property. The MSE wall elements were removed and the area was returned to a similar condition prior to the wall construction. We reviewed the photographs in the report and the work appears to have been completed in accordance with the plans. Geotechnical observations that were required as part of the permit were not completed during construction, however, the resulting slopes and rockery type structures generally appear to be less than 4-feet in height, and resulting slopes appear less than 21-1:1 V. The post construction report appears adequate for the completed work. KJ L: kt Attachments One copy submitted (via email only) Document ID: External_Memorandum.docx © 2017 GeoDesign, Inc. All rights reserved. 07/21 /17 10700 Meridian Avenue North, Suite 402 1 Seattle, WA 98133 1 206.838.9900 1 www.geadesigninc.com A�k CITY OF Fe d e ra l 'flay NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Yoon Slope Remediation & Bulkhead Repair/ File No: 16-105952-00-SE Proposal: Proposed existing bulkhead restacking approximately 100 feet long and 5 feet in height landward of the ordinary high water mark. Other work includes removing landscaping pavers and geologically hazardous area stabilization with vegetation on a site along Puget Sound. Proponent: William G. Rehe Jr., 8305 Dogwood Lane NW, Gig Harbor, WA 98332 Location: 31008 39"' Place SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way, Community Development Department Staff Contact: Leila Willoughby, Associate Planner, 253-835-2644 Email: LeiIa.Willoughby-Oakes@cityoffederalway.com The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act pursuant to RCW 43.31C.I 10. This information is available to the public on request. Further infonmation regarding this action is available to the public upon request from the Department of Community Development. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on January 27, 2017. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal. Anyone may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk (33325 8t1' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003), no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 17, 2017, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on January 13, 2017. Doc, I D. 75108 3100 s' aV'Plac2 So -G12rto� 10--10?�5�k Leila Willouahbv-Cakes A%a6aW4Qe&: ba«ici &AwO , 4x From: Edward Walsh . J Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 10:45 AM Ce", . To: Leila Willoughby -Oakes Subject: RE: Geotechnical Report: 2nd Opinion Leila - I skimmed through their report. I completely agree this one should be peer reviewed. Main items I saw: ■ A discussion of the upslope drainage area and any influence from roof drains, surface water, etc. on existing conditions and the proposed walls should be included. ■ The scope of how much of the existing walls are required to be removed should be included and any required stabilization (soil nailing, tiebacks, etc.) for sections remaining should be added to the report. ■ Failure of rock bulkhead is referenced as to be repaired later. At a minimum, as part of any project approval, this should be required to be stabilized to prevent further failure and damage to this and the neighboring property. • Requirements for which foundations/walls (or all) must be designed for uplift should be included. The report references uplift requirements but it is unclear which walls this is necessary for. Additionally since the walls are proposed as segmental block, the report should address how the segmental block is to be attached to the foundation and upper courses of block. ■ Proposed retaining wall requirements should address the need for reinforcement. They are proposing to do it with deadmen, which is acceptable, however minimum setbacks from face of wall, batter requirements, etc. should be included. Discussion of how the deadmen are to be structurally connected should also be included. If it is through welding, requirements for repairing galvanizing should also be addressed. ■ Locations of foundation/wall drains should be added to the plan. ■ The deadmen appear to be proposed solely for the foundation. The report should address the need for reinforcement of the segmental block above the foundation. a The report references structural foam as an option instead of backfill. Given the proximity to the Sound, coupled with groundwater observed in the boring, requirements to prevent uplift of the foam behind the wall should be addressed. ■ A requirement for design, construction oversight of piling and foundations, and construction certification upon completion by a licensed engineer should be included. ■ Requirements for testing during construction should be identified in the report. ■ An overall global stability analysis of the wall systems and interactions between the various walls should be included in the report or required as part of the wall design. ■ As part of the wall design, a requirement that localized slope stability analysis be performed for critical sections should be included. Let me know if you have any questions. EJ Walsh, PE Development Services Manager Public Works Department 33325 8th Ave South Federal Way, WA 98003 Office: (253) 835-2730 www.CitvofFederalWay.com STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office 3190160th SE Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 (425) 649-7000 March 25, 2016 Hannah Blackstock Soundview Consultants LLC 2907 Harborview Drive, Suite D Gig Harbor, WA 98335 Delivered Electronically RE: Verification of the Ordinary High Water Mark Determination for the Yoon Property Dear Ms. Blackstock: Thank you for providing the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) with a copy of your ordinary high water mark (OHWM) analysis for the Yoon property (dated February 26, 2016) and for taking time to meet with us on March loth. The subject property is located at 31008 39' Place Southeast in the City of Federal Way (City). Ecology has been assisting City staff in resolving unpermitted work within shoreline jurisdiction on this site. Establishing the OHWM is a key element in moving forward with resolution of this matter. Based on our recent site visit, I concur with the OHWM as staked by Soundview Consultants LLC in the field and as depicted in your OHWM analysis. This OHWM determination is consistent with the regulatory definitions found in the Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58.030(2)(c)) and implementing rules (WAC 173-22- 030(5)(a)). Thanks again for your assistance with this project. Please let me know if you have any questions. You may call me at (425) 649-7148 or send an e-mail to 12aan461@ecy.wa.go v. Sincerely, Paul Anderson, PWS Wetlands/401 Unit Supervisor Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Hannah Blackstock RE: Yoon OHWM Verification March 25, 2016 Page 2 E-cc: David Pater, Ecology Leila Willoughby -Oakes, City of Federal Way Jeremy Downs and Racheal Villa, Soundview Consultants LLC g 1 4**1 Soundview Consultants Environmental Assessment • Planning • Land Use Solutions 2907 Harborview Drive, Suite D Gig Harbor, WA 98335 Phone: 253.514.8952 Fax: 253.514.8954 Technical Memorandum To: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, City of Federal Way File Number:1428.0001 From: Hannah Blackstock, Soundview Consultants LLC Date: February 26, 2016 Re: Ordinary High Water Delineation and Assessment Dear Leila, Soundview Consultants LLC (Soundview) has been hired by Hyongsop Yoon (Applicant) to provide a shoreline assessment on a property located at 31008 39ffi Place Southeast, Federal Way, Washington. The subject property is located in the Northeast'/4 of Section 11, Township 21, Range 03, W.M. (King County Tax Parcel Number 758200-0070). This Technical Memorandum has been written in order to resolve a prior violation and to document the results of the shoreline assessment conducted by Soundview Consultants LLC. The subject property was investigated to analyze the effects of the violation and to delineate ordinary high water (OHW) on January 29 and February 16, 2016. The OHW mark was determined using definitions provided in RCW 77.55.011 (11) and WAC 220.110.020 (69) and Ecology's guidance as detailed in "Determining the Ordinary High Water Mark on Streams in Washington State" (Olson, 2008). During the January 29`h site visit, high tide reached approximately +12.3 feet (MLLW), and during the February 16th site visit, high tide reached approximately +11.6 feet (MLLW), providing clear visual references to normal peak and mean higher high water (IVIHHW) elevations to assist in OHW determination. Evidence of OHW marks from adjacent and offsite properties was also used as support in the onsite OHW determination. Prior to the site investigation, background research was conducted using the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) database, City of Federal Way Critical Areas Maps, King County iMaps, Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDOE) Coastal Atlas, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) maps. The subject property is currently developed with an approximately 3,500 square foot single-family residence and associated infrastructure. The northern property boundary abuts Dumas Bay in Puget Sound. The project proposes to remediate a shoreline violation with the City of Federal Way and restore upland areas damaged by failure of existing retaining walls. 1428.0001 Yoon Property Soundview Consultants LLC Shoreline Violation and Planting Plan 1 February 26, 2016 The initial site investigation consisted of a walk-through survey of all accessible areas within and adjacent to the subject property by Hannah Blackstock, Staff Scientist/Project Manager of Soundview. Five OHW flags were installed (Z-1 through Z 5) along the shoreline. OHW flags were placed according to observed and presumed wave action within interstitial voids of existing rip rap, evidence of soil erosion, and presence of un-eroded leaf detritus. Following discussion with WSDOE, a second site investigation during a tidal elevation close to MHHW, or 11.8 feet, was deemed necessary. During the second site investigation, the tide reached approximately +11.6 feet (MLLW), 0.2 feet lower than MHHW. Peak tides for Dumas Bay are approximately +13.0 feet (MLLW) (the January 14`' king tide reached +12.9 feet (NIILW)). Wave action has the potential to extend OHW further landward; however, the subject property is located within a relatively protected area of Dumas Bay where little significant wave action occurs except from occasional winter storms. No vegetation or soil was present within 4 to 6 feet of the face of the bulkhead onsite. In fact, there was no soil within the majority of the revetment because soil was undermined from underneath by a highly porous rock wall. All evidence of erosion observed behind the revetment appears to be result of a recent landslide and failure of the rock wall combined with direct precipitation and is located at elevation unlikely to receive any wave action other than minor overspray. As vegetation and soil indicators were not clearly present onsite, offsite conditions and tidal elevations were used to evaluate a conservative OHW estimate. Using an obvious line of eroded soils, undisturbed vegetation, and deposited woody debris observed approximately 100 feet to the west, a clear OHW mark was identified offsite that corresponds to approximately 13.0 feet in elevation. Based upon this off -site observation on an unarmored beach, a waterline observed on a concrete bulkhead immediately to the west, and the observations of tidal elevation, the OHW flags were relocated to the inside edge of the existing rock bulkhead where an angular rock revetment begins. In addition, evidence in support of this OHW determination included: racked woody debris located on the beach at the outer face of the bulkhead, lawn grasses growing up to the face of the adjacent bulkhead to the east, leafy detritus accumulated from autumn present up to the face of the onsite bulkhead. Also, there were no signs of water overtopping the adjacent concrete patio and bulkhead area that is at an elevation of +16 feet (MLLW). The OHW flags are located approximately 2 to 4 feet landward of external face of the bulkhead onsite. They are located at an elevation of approximately +14 to +15 feet (MLLW). Please see Appendix A and B for a sketch of flag locations and photographs, respectively. The agreement of OHW location will impact how remediation will be designed to restore the shoreline. Soundview has identified restoration concepts that have been discussed with the Applicant and geotechnical engineer. Once OHW is confirmed by the City of Federal Way, the restoration plan can be prepared for submittal. If you have any further questions please contact me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, W_M_��L Hannah Blackstock Soundview Consultants LLC hg nnah@s oun diriewconsu 1 to n ts. corn February 26, 2016 Date 1428.0001 Yoon Property Soundview Consultants LLC Shoreline Violation and Planting Plan 2 February 26, 2016 Appendix A Sketch Map 1428.0001 Yoon Property Soundview Consultants LLC Shoreline Violation and Planting Plan February 26, 2016 \ R ■ IASI • •i - J Appendix B Photographs 1428.0001 Yoon Property Soundview Consultants LLC Shoreline Violation and Planting Plan February 26, 2016 r Y 't 7-- 7 _•}- , * L �4 - — J . '' awe i ° f � •fir -r IIJR DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 CITY OF A4k 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 Federal Way www,cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significarce (DS) and Scoping Notice L�r Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Pemit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed Jge-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on :: ,. J 1 , 2017. Project Name I O p n .Z I File Number(s) S Signature Date 17 K:\CD Administration Files\Declorai ion of Distribution.doc/Lost printed 1 /12/2017 10:33:00 AM Tamara Fix From: Jennifer Anderson <jnderson@fedwaymirror.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 3:16 PM To: Tamara Fix Subject: Re: Legal Notice - Yoon Bulkhead Got it, thanks! Jennifer Anderson Advertising Sales Consultant Direct: 253-946-2890 Internal: 35602 Fax: 253-925-5750 31919 1st Ave S, Ste 101, Federal Way, WA 98003 F-J] Sound Publishing Map Print Rates Online Rates Mcdia Kit Sound InFn On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Tamara Fix <Taniara.Fixncityoffederalwa .comma wrote: Please publish the attached legal notice (Yoon Bulkhead DNS, 16-105952) in Friday's (Jan. 13, 2017) issue. Please confirm and issue an affidavit of publication. 1 A�� CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Yoon Slope Remediation & Bulkhead Repair/ File No: 16-105952-00-SE Proposal: Proposed existing bulkhead restacking approximately 100 feet long and 5 feet in height landward of the ordinary high water mark. Other work includes removing landscaping pavers and geologically hazardous area stabilization with vegetation on a site along Puget Sound. Proponent: William G. Rehe Jr., 8305 Dogwood Lane NW, Gig Harbor, WA 98332 Location: 31008 39`' Place SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way, Community Development Department Staff Contact: Leila Willoughby, Associate Planner, 253-835-2644 Email: Leila.Willoughby-Oakes@cityoffederalway.com The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act pursuant to RC W 43.31 C.110. This information is available to the public on request. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request from the Department of Community Development. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on January 27, 2017. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal. Anyone may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk (33325 81h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003), no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 17, 2017, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Published in the. Federal Way Mirror on January 13, 2017. Doc LD. 75208 1�k CIT Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPNIENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION l i hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice 19 ?o.f Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Pelmit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was A mailed ❑ faxed [(e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on der I:st, w/err eA c�•eckf ;st 2017. Project Name �0 �J u File Number(s) Signature Date K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution6doc/Last printed 1 /12/2017 10:33:00 AM r �u - G C.1 L1 L: L' 01 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V mmmmmMm mmmmw w M m m M M w C. O Q7 O O Q7 M M m O O O O O M O O M M O N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 a w w a wQ� w a w a w w a w w a Lr w a x w a Offr w a w a w a w a M w a M w a w a w a w w a wC� w a a w w w LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL f�f! Z_ ` 0 M a W ¢ GI O❑❑❑ M co IL N N Z_ 0 d W ¢ U) O O Z 0 d W ¢ co W Z_ 0 a W ¢ c N w W > ¢ S F- 01 o 0 O m (3q W > ¢ S �— m Cl) coM O m rp W > ¢ S F- O M O m W > a S F O m O m J a 3E rn o O r m W > ¢ S F• OJ m O 0 M W > ¢ S= F• W m O 0 M w W > ¢ F O m NO 0 M w W > ¢ S F- M m 00 0 M w W > ¢ S F- LA M O 0 M w W > ¢ S F- W Cl)m m0 0 M J a Y- rn M Ln OO � co W > ¢ S= F• M ~O 0 M co co W W > > ¢ ¢ S F- F- W W m m 0 N 0 0 M m w m w m aD m W m Q Y W c ❑ Q z O F W it W 2 LL U J ❑ }LL LL a, Z Q¢ � F- F' Z Z W❑ Z M F_ J J J }� = J =Q U Y _ � j m C_ ¢ fED QQ g ` U U Y¢ Y Y W 0 3 Z W J+ U W>- J U 3 U S WMWZ J + } Z to J J Z 0 Z W❑ w O Z U 0<= n w- m j Q W C. ¢¢ W Z o w Y U a� to 0 W�� M W W O Y �% ZU ir Q W Zi J W O W o' Z W U' � Y w� LL LL o Z❑ W Z e w 9 W 0 Z)Y. ILLi w U ❑ J a s ¢ co W U 7 d In t` In m CD O O O CD O O O O O O O O CDCDN m m In N m� w w w O O N m C w O r- O Cl O 0 0 O O O O O— r :3 O O M O O O M O O O O O CD O O O O O O M m m mmmOO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ONNNN NNN NN_ N N N N NN N N N N N w M O O m w m O m 0 O w m m O r- In Ln Ln Ln LO In M Ln M M M M M M M F _ Tamara Fix To: Suzanne.l.anderson@usace.army.mil, separegister@ecy.wa.gov, brandon.reynon@puyalluptribe.com, basbury@lakehaven.org, russ.ladley@puyalluptribe.com, reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov, karen.walter@muckleshoot.nsn.us, laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us, chris.ingham@southkingfire.org, gordon.goodsell@southkingfire.org, rflynn@ci.tacoma.wa.us, sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov, laura.arber@dfw.wa.gov Subject: Yoon Slope Remediation and Bulkhead Repair DNS Attachments: Yoon SEPA Checklist 16-105951-SE.pdf, 20170112120731.pdf Attached is a SEPA Checklist and DNS for the above -mentioned project in the City of Federal Way. The Associate Planner for the project, Leila Willoughby -Oakes, can be reached at leila.willoughy-oakes@citvoffederalway.com or 253-835- 2644. Tamara Fix Administrative Assistant Federal Vticy 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2602 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com \\� \/3 u 33\ < ƒo -t w ƒ L / m * ¥ \ « £ K I e 3 < tee§ CD b%- \92 � / w$� z±m x<� Eo %f <=o=^d m /E /3E/3 \\/\sl e o \C)§ § / \ G/ ®$b ® U)\LO C: /\ / /� � _ »/§YC//// /�W E Z� � ,±m/o� c6Om \�Rƒcu¥/e �guy /^oRro§ w0E <O ƒ/$\/E \\�/% //\c'J ��/\k //�\k ®RI�«n $E/22 �42®2% °<_° -J<< xEE 22 ±a <-1-J E //E%§ 2000= 2/0m L®rLO =a ±Eg�Im =�2.R= <00c: :#> y. ao7eo D- o e 2 O-js Dn=% «�«_= O±=% »<O4� �$oalo± $2M4� -R:En«2 mrE0 C3 RERc > a k Of/ z/ z E �ƒ m 00 / 2 zof % § /0 �p2 \ 5 /� e�< / L�� 01L 7 y \a 2LL 0O/ / // //R/\ c o of O ep 2 0 <L<m- �m� 7o O e 2��2/ %> zm$>> bƒ< �§ / r�� /2LLJ< �/ »/ */»±�_ �0=) O /� eR/R</ 22$/f \\®i� /oo\$n LR\%% 2Eg/fir ƒ//�� Oo\2\7 x± 2+ ±2 «7 Q\-E< <<x« \®a0D ƒ5�x/� Osxe ca0L»§ 230±- D-3a\ \�f�/%ƒG/M ƒ/�«/7 <$�/\ %//7/% DmR0w ±uO -m E2@/4@ »<o±m 2Eses§ m2<Emm Om&O� EEImR2 E2Es= EeIOE- CITY OF `- Federal Way DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Yoon Slope Remediation and Bulkhead Repair File No: 16-105952-00-SE Proposal: Proposed existing bulkhead restacking approximately 100 feet long and 5 feet in height landward of the ordinary high water mark. Other work includes removing landscaping pavers and geologically hazardous area stabilization with vegetation on a site along Puget Sound. Proponent: William G. Rehe Jr., 8305 Dogwood Ln. NW, Gig Harbor, WA 98332 Location: 31008 39th Pl. SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way, Community Development Department Project Contact: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Associate Planner, 253-835-2644 Email: Leila.Willoughby-Oakes(@citvoffederalway.com. Subject Property The lead agency for this proposal has determined the proposals do not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist submitted by the staff project manager, the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, other municipal policies, plans, rules and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act pursuant to RCW 43.3IC. 110. This information is available to the public on request. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request from the Community Development Department. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on January 27, 2017. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Pursuant to FWRC 14.10.060(3), any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the Federal Way City Clerk (33325 8'h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003) no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 17, 2017, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to state specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Brian Davis Title: Director of Community Development, City of Federal Way Address: 33325 8t` Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Phone: 253-835-2612 r Date Issued: January 13, 2017 Signature: Doc. I.D. 75146 CITY of Federal Way January 13, 2017 William G. Rehe Jr. Leon Consulting 8305 Dogwood Lane NW Gig Harbor, WA 98023 r—lFILE. CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Email: Relie@ieon-environmentai.com Re: File #16-105952-00-SE; SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Yoon Slope Remediation & Bulkhead Repair, 31008 39`h Place SW, Federal Way Dear Mr. Rehe: The city has reviewed the environmental checklist submitted with the Shoreline Exemption for the Yoon Slope Remediation and Bulkhead Repair. It has been determined that the proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. As a result, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required to comply with the State . Envirownental Policy Act (SEPA). A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is enclosed. A 14-day comment period is required by the SEPA rules (WAC 197-1 1-340). A notice inviting comments will be published in the Federal Way Mirror, posted onsite, posted on the official public notification boards of the city and public libraries, and mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the site on January 13, 2017. At the end of the comment period (January 27, 2017), the department will determine if the DNS should be withdrawn, modified, or issued as proposed. All final determinations may be appealed within 21 days (February 17, 2017) following the comment deadline. No licenses, permits, or approvals will be issued until completion of the appeal period. Our decision not to require an EIS does not mean that the license, permit, or approval you are seeking from the city has been granted. Approval or denial of the proposal will be made by the appropriate administrative or legislative body vested with that authority. After a final decision has been made on your proposal (i.e., after a permit has been issued), you may, but are not required to, publish a Notice of Action as set forth in RCW 43.21 C.075. The Notice of Action sets forth a time period after which no legal challenges regarding the proposal's compliance with SEPA can be made. A copy of the Notice of Action form and copies of RCW 43.21 C.080 and WAC 197-11-680 providing instructions for giving this notice are available from the Department of Community Development. The city is not responsible for publishing the Notice of Action. However, the city is responsible for giving a notice (to parties of record) stating the date for commencing a judicial appeal (including the SEPA portion of that appeal) if your proposal is one for which the city's action on it has a specified time period within which any court appeals must be made. If you have any questions regarding this letter and environmental review component please contact me at Leila.Willottghby-Oakes a,citvoffecl_era]4v_ay.com or 253-835-2644. Sincerely, r Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner enc: DNS c: Hyongsop (Joe) Yoon, Emailed: hsi`✓mnfr -y ahw.eom (w/ enc.) Brad P. Biegerstaff, Emailed: Bradf3rtgcoresourcox 16-105952-00-SE Doc I. D. 75211 1 CITY OF Federal lay CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor January 5, 2017 Mr. William G. Rehe Jr. 8305 Dogwood Lane NW Gig Harbor, WA 98332 ehe -envir n .com Re: Files #16-105952-SE & 16-105951-SH; LETTER OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Yoon Shoreline Resolution & Bulkhead Repair, 31008 391h Place SW, Federal Way Dear Mr. Rehe: The Community Development Department is in receipt of your December 16, 2016, application. Your proposed project includes the restoration of a graded/disturbed shoreline slope with vegetation to its original condition, and the repair of a failing rock bulkhead, approximately nine feet long and five feet high. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Please consider this correspondence a formal Letter of Complete Application. Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 14.10.020, the application is deemed complete as of the date of this letter. The complete application determination is based on a review of your submittal relative to those requirements as set forth in FWRC 14.10.020. The submittal requirements are not intended to determine if an application conforms to the City of Federal Way codes; they are used only to determine if all required materials have been submitted. CLOSING Formal processing and review of your application will now begin. Technical review comments may follow at a later date. Any questions concerning your SEPA or Shoreline Exemption application may be directed to me at 253-835-2644, or eila.will hb -oa -es offederalwa .co . A residential building permit received December 16, 2016 (city file no. 16-105953-SF), will remain on -hold until the land use applications have been completed. Sincerely, r� Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner c: Hyongsop Yoon, 31008 39th Place SW, Federal Way, WA 98023; hsjyoon@yahoo.com File #16-105952-00-SE Doc. I.D. 75166 moo)-o =-n -urQ 2awl-a= a)0-a20 cn«-a>c« ,mo�>>o-10 °(c=cmc /qrOmm �kmOa2c A_$=CLm=��=>>%DS0O>ZKIz r�0I2 0�Mr-0CD :00;az eb\rr/$>o $/ Aj> -cmumm)3 ��a22 � /��\ CD C: R/72�/ �//�/ //k//7 > �> m* a® %>qeZ CD c� >fR A\/m/ CD e Rfmmf g R =3 /@_ _\aOn oC / 0) <-n $� _� fz? CD >Z �k g y f�2 2/ E 22z Cl)O o @ 5c iCA) w CD>m 3 z 0Z 0k 2 q q« ] a % a�a= n-nQ2 E>wlaE ;17->wK� \§O-0 G�a = o �Ec�> °CORE >O>-< -- m �G.r0�>m 0 0> �'0�C =RnlCD -<=Q < 2�2$7�M�%r/>\ Zf/\\ e/r-q/ ZU22(>> >\ R aI7-4/) /�z»§ /� ?3f� /EkD\/I /��/?� �O\ k oo c>Onc7n3com=cn-< cmo�\n �]Kcm §kU)0 k m mEEC CO @a-m20D M0 ¥l <M < k J e\ $ > Q 7 D k% / �_/\ q 0 /F / $� // / / ) cog F m m 2 p \ cn �y\'I- > ; r§E ;a C: § 2 /g7/k §� q UKo> /># e �/ Gq\�� � � co / CD �/ / 2 / / # m �00 �*$ �/ i 1�k CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Yoon Slope Remediation & Bulkhead Repair/ File No: 16-105952-00-SE Proposal: Proposed existing bulkhead restacking approximately 100 feet long and 5 feet in height landward of the ordinary high water mark. Other work includes removing landscaping pavers and geologically hazardous area stabilization with vegetation on a site along Puget Sound. Proponent: William G. Rehe Jr., 8305 Dogwood Lane NW, Gig Harbor, WA 98332 Location: 31008 39"' Place SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way, Community Development Department Staff Contact: Leila Willoughby, Associate Planner, 253-835-2644 Email: Leila.Willoughby-Oakes@cityoffederalway.com The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act pursuant to RCW 43.31C.110. This information is available to the public on request. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request from the Department of Community Development. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on January 27, 2017. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal. Anyone may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk (33325 81h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003), no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 17, 2017, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on January 13, 2017. Doc, I.D. 75208 [M i4ED DEC 16 201� ClY1( oF i eCa1R 1-'i'VAY Cultural Resource Consultants TECHNICAL MEMO 1602F-1 DATE: February 17, 2016 TO: Joe Yom FROM: Margaret Berger, Principal Investigator RE: Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, Federal Way, King County, Washington The attached short report form constitutes our final report for the above referenced project. No evidence of archaeological or historic sites was found in the project location. No further cultural resources investigations are recommended. Please contact our office should you have any questions about our findings and/or recommendations. 197 PARATT WAY SW, SUMS 100 PO BOX 10668, BAINBRIDGI: ISLAND, WA 98110 PHONE 206 8SS-9020 - info@mwaxom LqUTURAL RESOURCES REPORT COVER SHEET Author: Sonja Kassa Title of Report: Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Proect, Federal Way, King County, Washington Date of Report: February 17, 2016 County(ies): 1!gM Section: 11 Township: 21 N Range: 03 E Quad: Tacoma North WA 0997 Acres: less than 1 acre PDF of report submitted REQUIRED Yes Historic Property Inventory Forms to be Approved Online? ❑ Yes M No Archaeological Site s /Isolates Found or Amended? F1 Yes N No TCP(s) found? ❑ Yes R No Replace a draft? ❑ Yes Z No Satis& a DAHP Archaeological Excavation Permit requirement? EJ Yes # No Were Human Remains Found? 11 Yes DAHP Case # No DAHP Archaeological Site M _ Submission of PDFs is required. Please be sure that any PDF submitted to DAHP has its cover sheet, figures, graphics, appendices, attachments, correspondence, etc., compiled into one single PDF file. Please check that the PDF displays correctly when opened. Management Summary This report describes the cultural resources assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, Federal Way, King County, Washington. Joe Yoon requested a cultural resources assessment in support of permitting existing retaining walls, patio, and potential future bulkhead at his property in Federal Way, Washington. This assessment was developed to identify any previously recorded archaeological or historic sites in the project location and to evaluate the potential for the project to affect cultural resources. Background research and field investigations conducted by Cultural Resource Consultants did not result in the identification of any previously unrecorded historic or archaeological sites. No further cultural resources work is recommended. 1. Administrative Data Re op rt Title: Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, Federal Way, King County, Washington Author s . Sonja Kassa Report Date: February 17, 2016 Location: The project is located at 31008 39h Place SW in Federal Way, King County, Washington. Legal Description: This project is located on King County Tax Parcel 758200-0070. The legal description for the project is in Township 21 North, Range 03 East, Section 11, Willamette Meridian. T TSGS 7.5' Too =hic Ma 2 s : Tacoma North, WA (1997) (Figure 1). Total Area Involved: less than 1 acre. Objective esearch Desi This assessment was developed as a component of preconstruction environmental review with the goal of preventing cultural resources from being disturbed during construction of the proposed project by identifying the potential for any as -yet unrecorded archaeological or historic sites within the project area. Cultural Resource Consultants (CRC) work was intended, in part, to assist in addressing state regulations pertaining to the identification and protection of cultural resources (e.g., RCW 27.44, RCW 27.53). The Archaeological Sites and Resources Act (RCW 27.53) prohibits knowingly disturbing archaeological sites without a permit from the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP), and the Indian Graves and Records Act (RCW 27.44) prohibits knowingly disturbing Native American or historic graves. Due to the permitting process, DAHP requested an archaeological survey to ensure that no cultural resources are affected during property improvements (Attachment A). CRC's investigations consisted of review of available project information and correspondence provided by Souidview Consultants and Joe Yoon, local environmental and cultural information, CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 1 and historical maps. CRC also contacted cultural resources staff of the Duwamish Tribe, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Puyallup Tribe of Indians, and the Suquamish Tribe to inquire about project -related cultural information or concerns (Attachment B). The Squamish Tribe responded that they did not have any specific information to add regarding the proposed project. Any additional information made available subsequent to the submission of this report will be included in a revision of this report. This assessment utilized a research design that considered previous studies, the magnitude and nature of the undertaking, the nature and extent of potential effects on historic properties, and the likely nature and location of historic properties within the project area, as well as other applicable laws, standards, and guidelines (per 36CFR800.4 (b)(1)) (DAHP 2015). Project Description: Joe Yoon requested a cultural resources survey to be used in support of permitting existing retaining walls and patio, and potential future bulkhead repair on his property at 31008 39th PI SW, Federal Way, WA 98335 (Figures 2-5). Recorded Cultural Resources Present: Yes [ ] No [x] No archaeological or historic sites have been previously recorded within the project. 2. Background Research Background research conducted in February 2016. Context Overview: Numerous cultural resources investigations have been prepared by CRC (Berger 2008; Diedrich and Kassa 2012) and other cultural resources firms (Dampf 2005; Daugherty 2006; Flenniken and Trautman 2012; Nelson 1998; Shong and Miss 2006) in the Dumas Bay vicinity. The context presented here summarizes environmental, ethnographic, historical, and archaeological information presented in these reports by reference; archaeological and historic data from DAHP and the Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data (WISAARD) records search; ethnographic resources; geological and soils surveys (e.g., USDA NRCS 2016; WA DNR 2016); and historical maps and documents from Bureau of Land Management United States Surveyor General (USSG) Land Status & Cadastral Survey Records database, HistoryLink, Historic Map Works, HistoricAerials (NETR 2016), University of Washington's Digital Collection, Washington State University's Early Washington Maps Collection, and in CRC's library. Environmental Context: Federal Way is located within the Tsuga heterophylla (Western hemlock) vegetation zone, in the Puget Lowland physiographic province (Franklin and Dyrness 1973). The project is located on a shoreline bluff on the southern shore of Dumas Bay along Puget Sound. To the west is an enclosed lagoon within a near sea level depression and to the east is Joe's Creek located within a ravine that separates the project landforni from the bluff to the east. Surface GeoloM. The surface geology of the project area is mapped as Quaternary (Pleistocene) continental glacial drift (WA DNR 2016). This geologic unit is described as Pleistocene till and outwash clay, silt, sand, gravel, cobbles, and boulders deposited by or CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 2 originating from continental glaciers. Locally this material may consist of peat, non -glacial sediments, modified land, and artificial fill. Mapped Soils: Soils mapped in the project area consist of Coastal beaches (USDA NRCS 2016). No depositional profile was provided for this unit. Recent geotechnical testing within the project area conducted by GeoResources (2015) provides the surface and subsurface context for Us project. The project area is located on a shoreline bluff that ranges between 30 and 80 percent in slope with. approximately 45 feet of vertical relief with areas considered to be unstable. The slope is terraced to provide use and beach access and the existing single-family residence is located near the top of the bluff. Subsurface exploration included two subsurface auger holes reaching 9 to 10 feet in depth. These explorations revealed "8 to 12 inches of crushed rock, over fine to medium sand with fine gravel and variable silt content" (GeoResources 2015:2). Archaeological Context: Thousands of years of human occupation in Puget Sound area have been summarized in a number of archaeological, ethnographic, and historical investigations over the past several decades that provide a regional context for evaluating the project area (e.g_, Greengo 1983; Larson and. Lewarch 1995; Nelson 1990). Archaeological evidence suggests that as the transition into an ice -free regional landscape allowed the area to be suitable for habitation by approximately 11,000 years ago (Kruckeberg 1991:22). Subsequent changes to landforms, climate, and vegetation influenced the available resources and, consequently, the spatial distribution of human activities. In the Puget Sound, similar to elsewhere, human land use was generally structured around the value of natural resources available in local environments including fresh water, terrestrial and marine food resources, forests, and suitable terrain. Ethnohistoric economies were structured based on seasonally available resources, which translated to seasonal occupation and logistic mobility. Permanent villages were generally established along rivers during the winter, and temporary camps were used while traveling to obtain seasonal food sources during the warmer summer months. Local Indian people shared many broadly defined traditions with their inland Puget Sound neighbors, including subsistence emphasis on salmon and other fish, land game, and a wide variety of abundant vegetable foods as well as household and village communities linked by family and exchange relations (Suttles and Lane 1990). Traditional Territory: The project area is located within the traditional territory of Southern Lushootseed (Puget Salish) speaking peoples currently represented by the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Suttles and Lane 1990:485); however, it is likely that the neighboring Puyallup and Duwamish tribes also made use of this area. The Muckleshoot Tribe comprises groups who traditionally lived and used resources in the Green and White River valleys and adjacent plateaus (Suttles and Large 1990:Figure 1). The name Muckleshoot is derived from a named place on Muckleshoot Hill, BE `kEkcul, translated as "where a certain medicinal plant grows" (Waterman 2001:171). Here, Muckleshoot Indian Reservation was later established. EjEo a hic Context: Twentieth century ethnographers documented locations of villages and names for resource areas, water bodies, and other cultural or geographic landscape features CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 3 from local informants. Waterman (ca. 1920, 2001) recorded three named places on the Puget Sound shoreline around Dumas Bay and southwestern end of Poverty Bay: • Qa'gahwEts translated as "crabapples," is the name of a "a very small creek at Buenna," south of Redondo Creek (Waterman 2001:75, Table 5.5). • Kokowi'ltsa, translated as "blanket of marmot skins," for a boulder known as Blanket Rock because the surface appeared "folded and crinkled" like a blanket (2001:75). According to Duwamish oral history, this rock originated from a woman running along the beach away from her husband who was turned to stone by the Transformer; her husband threw a marmot blanket over the rock (Waterman 2001:69). • Stsoxwa'bats, translated as "chokecherry," is the name given to a stream west of Blanket Rock, where a low cliff and numerous chokecheny trees were located (Waterman 2001:75). This stream is likely referring to Joe's Creek approximately 0.8 kilometers (km) northeast of the project area. Historic Context: A synopsis of the history of the Federal Way and Dumas Bay area is found in Dampf (2005:8): Euro-American settlement in the area known today as Federal Way began in the 1850s when the U.S. Army constructed a road to move troops from Fort Steilacoom to Seattle in response to the 1855-56 Indian Wars (Historical Society of Federal Way 2002:3). The first road in King County, the Military Road was mainly devoted to military use for the next 20 years but hastened settlement throughout the region. Federal homestead legislation contributed to a steadily increasing population throughout the second half of the 19th-century. Settlers seeking title to public lands in what became King County claimed lands through the 1862 Homestead Act and its subsequent revisions. By 1890, most of the Native American population dispersed from the Federal Way area as Euro- American settlement continued along the shores of Poverty Bay at places such as Stones Landing, known today as Redondo (Historical Society of Federal Way 2000:4; Star Lake Improvement Club 1955:3). Farming was on a relatively small scale; most homesteads grew their own food and crops for their livestock (Historical Society of Federal Way 2000:3). Small steamers carrying mail between Seattle and Tacoma made regular stops offshore (residents had to row out and hail the steamer) at several points along the way, including Dumas Bay, Buenna, and Stones Landing. Logging began in the early 1900s as local operations were established along the shores of Poverty Bay. Most of the virgin timber was hauled to the present site of Salt Water State Park, but there were also operations at Woodmont Beach and Stones Landing (Star Lake Improvement Club 1955:8)... Sawmills were processing the timber within the area only a few years after the first logging operations began, and by 1930, the supply was exhausted.., In 1915, a new, gravel surfaced highway (the Seattle -Tacoma Highway, now known as Pacific Highway South) was built with federal fiords and was known as the Federal highway. Community development was slow after logging operations ceased, but attendant CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 4 problems of housing shortages following World War jJ and the development of Seattle -Tacoma International Airport in 1946 brought an influx of new residents to the area (Star Lake Improvement Club 1955:13). When the city was incorporated in 1990, it became known as the City of Federal Way. Historical Records Search: Review of historical maps and aerial imagery provides an understanding of the land use and ownership of the project parcel. The US SG (1886) map does not depict any annotations in the project vicinity. Joe's Creek is present on the map_ Anderson (1907) shows the project area within parcel owned by A. G. Hairing, the parcel was later subdivided and belonged to C. L. Osmond (Kroll 1912, 1926) followed by R. B. Brown (Metsker 1936). The earliest available aerial imagery of the project area is from 1936 at which time the area was forested and undeveloped and SR 509 was present in its current location (NETR 2016). Imagery from 1964, shows that the project and surrounding area had been logged and graded with 39 h and 38'h Ave constructed in preparation for future residences. Over the following decades, the lagoon to the west appears to have been largely filled in and single-family residences continued to be constructed in the local neighborhood. The single-family residence on the project parcel was constructed in 1966 and is outside of the project area (Ding County 2016). Photographs available on the King County Assessor show that the house has been modernized since construction. DAHP KSAARD; A review of the WISAARD database identified the previous cultural resource studies and recorded precontact and historic sites, which help gauge the potential and likely nature of cultural resources within the project (DABP 2016). No historic register properties, historic inventory properties, or cemeteries are located within the project vicinity. Seven cultural resources assessments have been conducted within 1.5 kilometers of the project area (Table 1). Only one of these identified previously unrecorded archaeology (Shang and Miss 2006); their findings are discussed. below. Two precontact shell midden sites are located on the eastern shore of Dumas Bay. The nearest is 45KI58, located approximately 0.65 km to the east on a north facing bank approximately 100 meters inland and 10 meters above the shoreline and adjacent to Lakota Stream (Moura 1980). This site was estimated to be 25 meters east -west by 7 meters north -south with a depth of 25 centimeters below surface. Site 45Ki732, located approximately 1.15 km to the northeast, was identified during a cultural resources assessment for a bulkhead removal project (Shang 2006; Shong and Miss 2006). This site consists of shallowly buried Ridden deposits (shell, faunal remains, and fire -modified rock) along a wave eroded beach terrace. The dimensions of this site are a 6.5-meter extent along the shoreline and shell lenses up to 10 meters west of the main deposit. Deposits ranged between 15 and 25 centimeters in depth. 3. Archaeological Expectations Archaeological Predictive Model: The DAHP statewide predictive model uses envirwiniental data about the locations of known archaeological sites to identify where previously unknown sites are more likely -to be found. The model correlates locations of known archaeological to environmental data "to determine the probability that, under a particular set of environmental conditions, another location would be expected to contain an archaeological site (Kauhi and CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 6 Markert 2009:2-3). Environmental data categories included in the model are elevation, slope, aspect, distance to water, geology, soils, and landforms. According to the model, the project location is ranked as having a high potential for archaeological sites, likely due to its coastal location and proximity to local freshwater streams. Archaeological Expectations: This assessment considers the implications of the predictive model coupled with an understanding of geomorphological context, local settlement patterns, and post - depositional processes to characterize the potential for archaeological deposits to be encountered. The precontact and historic use of the southern shore of Dumas Bay has been documented in in numerous sources discussed above. Despite this and the predictions generated by the DAHP predictive model, the project area is considered to have a lower potential to contain significant (i.e. intact) archaeological deposits for the following reasons: • Soil data indicate the project area has undergone significant geologic disturbance and post -glacial soil development is sparse. Archaeological deposits would be present above glacial deposits, which, due to the paucity of Holocene sedimentary deposition in the project area and vicinity, would be near the present-day ground surface. • No recorded archaeological sites or ethnographically named places were identified within the project area. • Local geomorphology and the mapped depositional context indicated that intact, undisturbed archaeological deposits, if present, would occur on more gently sloping surfaces and would likely be shallowly buried. Given the nature of the subject property it is likely that potential deposits were disturbed or redeposited by earth moving activities such as residential development or natural costal erosion. • The project area is located on an unstable coastal bluff of extreme relief and has been currently terraced to provide shoreline access from the residence above. Presumably, the use of the project area prior to these developments was likely restricted. 4. Fieldwork Total Area Examined: The entire project (less than 1 acre). Areas not examined: None. Date(s)_ofSurvey_: February 15, 2016 Weather and Surface Visibility: Weather conditions were 50 degrees, overcast, and misty. Mineral soil visibility within the project area was poor and largely obscured by the presence of concrete pavers, retaining walls, landscaping, and fill. Some soil exposures were present in places where the retaining walls were failing. Fieldwork conducted b : Sonja Kassa. Notes are on file with CRC. Fieldwork consisted of surface survey and subsurface testing via hand excavated shovel test probes (STPs). Prior to subsurface testing, the archaeologist conducted a pedestrian survey of the project in an effort to understand the current condition and gauge the potential for as yet CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 6 unknown archaeology within the project boundary. The project area consisted of a steep hillside of 45-foot vertical relief that had been cut into approximately five artificial terraces consisting of concrete block retaining walls and pavers, hard armoring and obscuring the surface (Figures 6-8). The retaining walls and adjacent pavers were actively failing and eroding down the hillside. Hillside conditions on the property to the northeast provided insight to the natural conditions that previously characterized the project area (Figure 9). This comparison demonstrated that little if any of the original topography and surface sediments remained intact within the project area. Two STPs were excavated in the northern portion of the project area to observe the subsurface conditions that characterize the project area (Figures 10 and 11; Table 2). The STPs were placed along the eastern margin on the northern and southern comers of the project area where surface armoring was absent. The probes were manually excavated with a shovel and all sediments were passed through 1/4-inch hardware mesh to screen for artifacts. The probes were 30 centimeters in diameter. Native sediments were present in the project area below landscaping beauty bark and fill behind the bulkhead. Observed native sediments consisted of light gray moist unconsolidated fine sand with few gravels; consistent with the mapped soils and geotechnical observations. These probes were negative for archaeological material and were backfilled immediately following documentation. 5. Results Cultural Resources Identified: None. Project Conclusions Findings and Recommendations: Reconnaissance survey and subsurface testing did not identify any archaeological material or historic sites within the project. Results of background research and field observations indicate a low potential for the project to affect archaeological deposits based on the extreme relief of the project area; evidence that surface deposits have been excavated away during logging and landscaping activity removing any surface or shallowly buried deposits; and proximity to more suitable landforms where local archaeology has been previously identified. CRC recommends that the project proceed without further archaeological oversight. In the unlikely event that ground disturbing or other activities do result in the inadvertent discovery of archaeological deposits (see protocol in Attachment Q, work should be halted in the immediate area and contact made with DAHP in Olympia. Work should be halted until such time as further investigation and appropriate consultation is concluded. In the unlikely event of the inadvertent discovery of human remains, work should be immediately halted in the area, the discovery covered and secured against fuuher disturbance, and contact effected with law enforcement personnel. No historic properties affected [x] Historic properties affected [ ] No adverse effect to historic properties [ ] Adverse effect to historic properties [ ] CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 7 Attachments: Figures [x] Photographs [x] Other [x] Copy of project related correspondence from DABP. [x] Copies of project related correspondence between CRC and Tribal cultural resources staff. [x] Proposed inadvertent discovery protocol. 6. Limitations of this Assessment No cultural resources study can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for prehistoric sites, historic properties or traditional cultural properties to be associated with a project. The information presented in this report is based on professional opinions derived from our analysis and interpretation of available documents, records, literature, and information identified in this report, and on our field investigation and observations as described herein. Conclusions and recommendations presented apply to project conditions existing at the time of our study and those reasonably foreseeable. The data, conclusions, and interpretations in this report should not be construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions described in this report. They cannot necessarily apply to site changes of which CRC is not aware and has not had the opportunity to evaluate. 7. References Anderson Maps Company (Anderson) 1907 Page 3 - Township 21 North, Range 3 East. In Atlas of King County 1907. Electronic document, http://www.histoiicmapworks.com/Map/US/125003 I/Page+3+++Township+2l+North+ +Range+3+East/King+County+1907/Washington/, accessed February 10, 2016. Berger, Margaret 2008 Cultural Resources Assessment of the Lakota Wastewater Treatment Plant Outfall Realignment Project, Federal Way, King County, Washington. Cultural Resource Consultants, Inc. Submitted to Grette Associates. Dampf, Steven K. 2005 Archaeological Resources Survey Lakehaven Utility District Lakota Beach Pressure System King County, Washington. Historical Research Associates, Inc. Submitted to Lakehaven Utility District. Daugherty, Richard D. 2006 An Archaeological Survey of Property on the Shore of Dumas Bay, King County, Washington. Submitted to Roger Goodwin. On file at DAHP, Olympia. Diedrich, Melanie, and Sonja Kassa 2012 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Archbishop Brunett Retreat Center Bulkhead and Beach Access Improvements Project, Federal Way, King County, Washington. Cultural CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 8 Resource Consultants, Inc. Submitted to the Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle. Flenniken, J. Jeffery, and Pam J. Trautman 2012 Proposed Montgomery/Featherstone Bulkhead Project, 2820 SW 300t` Place, Parcel 41660-0140, Federal Way, King County, Washington. Lithic Analysts. Submitted to Pat Montgomery. Franklin, Jerry F., and C. T. Dyrness 1973 Natural f, egetation of Oregon and Washington. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report PNW 8. GeoResources, Inc. 2015 Geotechnical Summary Report Emergency Exemption Retaining Wall Repair — Support. GeoResources, Inc. Submitted to Joe Yoon. Greengo, Robert E. (editor) 1983 Prehistoric Places on the Southern Northwest Coast. Thomas Burke Memorial Washington State Museum, University of Washington, Seattle. Historical Society of Federal Way 2000 1989 Centennial Calendar. Passages in Time Spring 2000. Historical Society of Federal Way, Federal Way, Washington. Kauhi, T. C., and J. Markert 2009 Washington Statewide Archaeology Predictive Model. Submitted to DAHP, Olympia. GeoEngineers. King County Assessor 2016 Parcel Search. Electronic resource, http://info.kingcounty. gov/Assessor/eRealProperty/Dashboard. aspx?ParceINbr--75 82000 070, accessed February 10, 2016. Kroll Map Company 1912 Township 21 N Range 3 E. In Atlas of King County 1912. Electronic document, http://www.histon'cmapworks. com/Map/US/503546/TownsWp+21+N+Range+3+E/Kin. g+County+1912/Washington/, accessed February 10, 2016. 1926 Plate 003 - T. 21 N., R. 3 E., Puget Sound, Commencement Bay, Dumas Bay. In Atlas of King County 1926. Electronic document, http://www.histoticmapworks. com/Map/tJS/1610873/Plate+003+++T++21+N+++R++3 +E+++Puget+5ound++Comm encement+B ay++Dum as+B ay/King+County+1926/Washi ngton/, accessed February 10, 2016. Kruckeberg, A. R. 1991 The Natural History of Puget Sound County. University of Washington Press. Seattle. CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 9 Larson, Lynn L., and Dennis E. Lewarch (editors) 1995 The Archaeology of West Point, Seattle, Washington: 4,000 Years of Hunter -Fisher - Gatherer Land Use in Southern Puget Sound. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services, Gig Harbor, Washington. Metsker Maps (Metsker) 1936 Township 21 N., Range 3 E., Tacoma, Commencement Bay, Lakota, Adelaide. In Atlas of King County 1936. Electronic resource, http://www.histon'cmapworks.com/Map/IJS/126001 I/Township+21+N+++Range+3+E+ ++Tacoma++Commencement+Bay++Lakota++Adelaide/King+County+1936/Washingt on/, accessed February 10, 2016. Moura, Guy 1980 Master Site File, 45KI58. On file at DAHP, Olympia. Nationwide Environmental Title Research, LLC (NETR) 2016 Historic Aerials. Electronic Resource, http://www.historicaexials.com/?javascript, accessed February 10, 2016. Nelson, Charles M. 1990 Prehistory of the Puget Sound Region. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 7. Northwest Coast, edited by Wayne Suttles, pp. 481-484. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Nelson, Margaret 1998 Heritage Resource Investigations of the Proposed Ventana Development, Federal Way, Washington. Submitted to Wellington -Morns Corporation. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. Shong, Michael 2006 State of Washington Archaeological Site Inventory Form, 45KI732. On file at DAHP, Olympia. Shong, Michael, and Christian J. Miss 2006 Shell Midden Discovery During a Proposed Bulkhead Installation in the Lakota Community of Federal Way, King County, Washington. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. Submitted to Peter Shinier. Star Lake Improvement Club 1955 The Story of Your Community. Star Lake Improvement Club, Star Lake, Washington. Suttles, Wayne, and Barbara Lane 1990 Southern Coast Salish. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 7. Northwest Coast, edited by Wayne Suttles, pp. 485-502. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 10 United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS) 2016 Web Soil Survey, Washington. Electronic resource, http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx, accessed February 10, 2016. United States Surveyor General (US SG) 1868 General Land Office Map, Township 21 N., Range 03 W, Willamette Meridian. Electronic resource, http://www.blm.gov/or/landrecords/survey/yPlatViewl_2.php?path PWA&name=t210n 030e 003 jpg, accessed February 10, 2016. Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) 2015 Washington State Standards for Cultural Resources Reporting 2015.On file at DAHP, Olympia. 2016 Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data (WISAARD). Electronic resource, https:Hsecureaccess.wa.gov/dahp/Wisaardp3/, accessed February 10, 2016. Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WA DNR) 2016 Washington Interactive Geologic Map. Division of Geology and Earth Resources — Washington's Geological Survey. Electronic resource, https://fortress.wa.gov/dnr/geology/, accessed February 10, 2016. Waterman, T. T. ca.1920 Puget Sound Geography. Unpublished manuscript, Allen Library, University of Washington, Seattle. 2001 sda?da? gw el dibel lesucid Meaciltalbixw Puget Sound Geography. Vi Hilbert, Jay Miller, and Zalmai Zahir, contributing editors. Lushootseed Press, Federal Way, Washington. CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 11 8. Figures and Tables rigure 1. U6U6 I acoma North, WA (1997) 7.5-minute quadrangle annotated with the general location of the project area in red. CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 12 Q� oy6usWM �oPlloJapaju—8L5Ms a.n400FF i 1 o V {S � SIInM 6ululoaaa V cA 9 L (moo NO w ; s, r1 N uj of W Y Q Q Z aQ o ` m �x X Q Q wo_ U — �^�" J tz bi U en 0 O O / • f� I I � 1 r .' r /cc 1 =9 NJbB r Z -C 3 I F+ a A r £flfl r N ' 0 5. w R ' gs M y16c o I r C M LL a r Ncj N t co ca E� a c c N 7 a 0 mU rn •o �a ofa N U� Y 3 m c 0 O N .O — at0000aes� uo�6uiysoM 'Roh1 lo�apaj _ c� — MS a��ld 4:6£-900L£ s�loM 6wulo}nb uoo,� dad V ,q QAI J n°S� Z � o O w U w @ his IL Ozo� � 3 ;j > ¢off i �f`�ei= Eet3s d O rn id`}'iF Cw] 30� m ,w — Ss F N K Ch a N ■ M� w N XO w a M w w 1^ i wit _O O LD • 3 n 0 f a In2 JIJb8J3S_5i.�_y �� P � J 7 I j c¢i x I f f ©w 1 �4C er a. +f it I e o I � � eb I Vd 0027 I� r y 4 JIJbgL35.. _...... - ----_...��-' �a w0 � 1 U �°�' �F •� ? L I 1 P. €" E G O OLODD07.99L W U015ultram 'ADM lwapaj MS 80DId 416E—DOOIT S M JjDBulul ul.oja8 UOQk 3i R F-1 ZW 200 C) P MHO V 0 2 W_ cn T N7tlS3.L3S ,Si j4 Of S z -�7p Ic — C U) LL 2 — NJ tm 4) p C tm to (a E v 0 E a) tm C j3L L) m it a) Uy 75 O 11 vl I { + X W W +ern OLOCOOZ29L u016ul4soM 'Fom l0:epaj MS 80old 416£-9 00T£ �m U alpha 6ululolaa u00A i o , e° za �3 I y` f 4 F LL 0r o c rn to M a. E 7 r- C C N � 0 0 EU rn � Y c U 0 tea` ~a UL Y 7 m C 0 0 } 0 L 0` Figure 6.Overview of the project area looking southwest. Figure 7.Overview of the project area looking west. CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 17 Figure S. Overview of the southern portion of the project area looking east. Figure 9. Overview of the neighboring property to the east representing the conditions that likely characterized the project area prior to artificial terracing. CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 18 Y Y �r :F' '�, � �,�y �•" Nay � �- �� �— L r R Figure 10. Photograph of STP 1- Figure 11. Photograph of STP 2. CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 19 iaDie i. t;tutural resources urvestr attons conducted in the DumasBair vicinity. Author Date Title Results and Recommendations Berger 2008 1 Resources No recorded historic sites were present within the project but ACultural ssessment of the Lakota one archaeological site had been recorded adjacent to an Wastewater Treatment Plant existing outfall pipeline. Field reconnaissance located the site Outfall Realignment Project, (45K159); no additional archaeological deposits beyond Federal Way, King County, recorded site boundaries were identified. Ground disturbing Washington project actions were expected to be limited to outside the mapped site boundaries and were not likely to affect cultural resources. However, construction traffic was anticipated on the access road. It was recommended that site boundaries be flagged and protected prior to construction, to ensure that the site was not disturbed. Darnpf 2005 Subsurface Archaeological BRA conducted a literature review and an archaeological Survey, Lakehaven Utility resources survey to identify properties that are potentially District, Lakota Beach eligible for listing in the NRHP and that could be affected Pressure System, King during construction activities along the sewer line route. County, Washington Systematic field survey did not identify any archaeological resources that would be affected by the ro' ect. Daugherty 2006 An Archaeological Survey of Based on investigations, no cultural material was found in the Property on the Shore of undisturbed vertical face of the exposed bank, in disturbed Dumas Bay, King County, slump, or on the beach below. If cultural materials were Washington present in the disturbed deposits they would have been of little scientific value, No further cultural resources oversight was recommended. Diedrich 2012 Cultural Resources CRC conducted a cultural resources assessment for a and Kassa Assessment for the bulkhead replacement at The Archbishop Brunett Retreat Archbishop Brunett Retreat Center. No recorded archaeological sites or ethnographically Center Bulkhead and Beach named places were within the proj ect vicinity. Field survey Access Improvements did not result in the identification of potentially significant Project, Federal Way, King cultural resources located within the project area. No further County, WA assessment work was recommended. Flenniken 2012 Proposed Although one precontact site has been mapped nearby, this and Montgomery/Featherstone study concludes that site 45KI732 is not located within the Trautman Bulkhead Project, 2820 SW project area, which has minimal_potential-for_significant- ---- 300s` Place, Parcel 41660- cultural resources. Based on the results of this survey, it was 0140, Federal Way. King determined that no historic properties would be affected, and Coun , Washin on no further investigation was recommended_ Nelson 1998 Heritage Resource None of the debris observed appeared to be associated With a Investigations of the potentially significant historic or prehistoric site. Any Proposed Ventana structures that might have been located on the property may Development, Federal Way, have been razed and most of the debris removed. Although Washington the presence of any extensive sites appeared unlikely based on the results of the survey, it was considered possible that heritage resources not located by the survey could be exposed by land clearing and construction. Shong 2006 Shell Mi dden Discovery NWAA discovered a precontact shell midden prior to a and Miss During a Proposed Bulkhead proposed bulkhead installation. This site was recorded and is Installation in the Lakota likely eligible for listing on the NRHP under criterion D. It Community of Federal Way, was recommended that the bulkhead replacement plan by King County, Washington. altered to avoid the site. It was recommended that excavation in native soils or along the shoreline be preceded by an archaeological survey. CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 20 Probe #VwWProbe Location Stratigraphic Description (depths are centimeters below Archaeological (WGS84 Zone 10 surface [cmbs]) Materials UTM coordinates, Found +/- 3 meters 1 0546707 E 0-30: Unconsolidated fine sandy clay with angular rocks and None 5241588 N gravels, and concrete fragments (Fill) 30-38: Compact dark brown loamy sand with gravels (buried surface?) 38-75: Uniform unconsolidated grey fine sand with few gravels 2 5546708 E 0-5: Beauty bark None 5241577 N 5-65: Uniform unconsolidated grey fine sand with few gravels CRC Technical Memorandum g16ort--I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 21 Auacnmeni a. Lahr Arenaeoiogicai TDEPARN" Or RCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION G.,r Fi:a TeccIn=�ri.. February 3, 2015 Ms. Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 letter. Aliyson [books Ph.D., Director State Historic Preservation officer In future correspondence please refer to: Log: 020315-15-KI Property: Phone/Emall Consult for Yoon Site After the fact Permitting for landscaping and bulkhead Re: Archaeology - Survey Requested Dear Ms. Willoughby -Oakes: We have reviewed the materials forwarded to our office for the proposed project referenced above. The area has a high potential for archaeological resources. There is a precontact archaeological site approximately 2,000 feet from the project. The project parcel is depicted on the Statewide Archaeological Predictive Model as having the highest probability for containing precontact archaeological resources. If this project had be reviewed by DAHP prior to implementation, a professional archaeological survey would have been requested. Please be aware that archaeological sites are protected from knowing disturbance on both public and private lands in Washington States. Both RCW 27.44 and RCW 27.53.060 require that a person obtain a permit from our Department before excavating, removing, or altering Native American human remains or archaeological resources in Washington. Failure to obtain a permit is punishable by civil fines and other penalties under RCW 27.53.095, and by criminal prosecution under RCW 27.53.090. Chapter 27.53.095 RCW allows the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation to issue civil penalties for the violation of this statute in an amount up to five thousand dollars, in addition to site restoration costs and investigative costs. Also, these remedies do not prevent concerned tribes from undertaking civil action in state or federal court, or law enforcement agencies from undertaking criminal investigation or prosecution. Chapter 27.44.050 RCW allows the affected Indian Tribe to undertake civil action apart from any criminal prosecution if burials are disturbed. We request a professional archaeological survey of the project area be conducted at this time. The survey should include subsurfacc methodology that will pcmetrate the unpennitted improvements to sample native sails. If archaeological resources are identified, a permit tmm DAHP and mitigation and restoration will be required under RCW 27.53. The survey may take place at the time of the geotechnical testing so that the geotech samples may be examined by a professional archaeological. A copy of the completed survey report should be submitted to DAHP and the interested Tribes for review prior to petrnil ing so that we can determine if a permit from DAHP and additional archaeological work is required under RCW 27.53. If any federal funds or permits are involved Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, and its implementing regulations, 36CFR800, must be followed. This is a separate process State of Washington - Deparlment of Archaeology & Historic Preservation P.O. Box 48343 - Olympia, Washington 98504-8343 - (360) 586-3065 www.dahp.wo.gov CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 22 from SEPA and requires formal gavanment-to-govemmeut eousultatian with the affected Tribes and this agency. We would appreciate receiving any correspondence or comments from concerned tribes or other p"os concerning cultural resource issues that you receive. Th=kyou for the opportunity to review this project and we look forward to receiving the survey report. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contar t me at (360) 586-3088 or Gretchen.Kaehler(a_)dahp.wa.gov. Sincerely, Gretchen Kaehler Local Governments Archaeologist (360) 586-3088 .:lclten.f;sehlet'Cr�dab .�rtl nv cc. Brandon Reynon, Cultural Regulatory Specialist, Puyallup Tribe Laura Murphy, Archaeologist, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Dennis Lewarch, THPO, Suquamish Tribe CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 23 Attachment B. Correspondence between CRC and area Tribes. Cultural Resource Consultants February 10, 2015 Duwamish Tribe Cecile Hansen, Chairwoman 4705 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 Re: Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, Federal Way, WA Dear Cecile: I am writing to inform you of a cultural resources assessment for the above referenced project and to seek additional information about the project area the Tribe may have that is not readily available through other written sources. The project is located in Section 11, Township 21 North, Range 03 Fast Willamette Meridian at 31008 39th Place SW in Federal Way, King County, Washington. Joe Yoon is requesting this survey to be used in support of permitting the existing retaining walls and patio, and potential future bulkhead repair on his property at 31008 39th Place SW in Federal Way. We are in the process of reviewing available information. Background research will include a site files search at the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, review of previously recorded cultural resource reports, and review of pertinent published literature and ethnographies. Results of our investigations will be presented in a technical memo_ We are aware that not all information is contained within published sources. Should the Tribe have additional infoanation to support our assessment, we would very much like to include it in our study. Please contact me should you wish to provide any comments. I appreciate your assistance in this matter and look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, aK- Sonja Kassa Projects Manager PO Box 10668, RAINRRInGF. ISLAND, WA 98110 PHONE206.855.9020 - info@crcwa.com CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 24 Cultural Resource Consultants February 10, 2015 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Laura Murphy, Archaeologist/Cultural Resources 39015 172nd Ave SE Auburn, WA 98092 Re: Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, Federal Way, WA Dear Laura I am writing to inform you of a cultural resources assessment for the above referenced project and to seek additional information about the project area the Tribe may have that is not readily available Wrough other written sources. The project is located is Section 11, Township 21 forth, Range 03 Fast Willamette Meridian at 31009 39th Place SW in Federal Way, King County, Washington. doe Yoon is requesting this survey to be used in support of permitting the existing retaining walls and patio, and potential future bulkhead repair on his property at 31008 39th Place SW in Federal Way. We are in the process of reviewing available information. Background research will include a site Files search at the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, review of previously recorded cultural resource reports, and review of pertinent published literature and ethnographics. Results of our investigations will be presented in a technical memo. We are aware that not all information is contained within published sources. Should the Tribe have additional information to support our assessment, we would very much like to include it in our study. Please contact me should you wish to provide any comments. I appreciate your assistance in this matter and look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, av Sonja Kassa Projects Manager PO Box 10668, BAIN13RIDGE ISLAND, WA 98110 PHONE206.855.9020 - infoom a.com CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 25 Cultural Resource Consultants February 10, 2015 Puyallup Tribe of Indians Brandon Reynon 3009 East Portland Ave Tacoma, WA 98404 Re: Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, Federal Way, WA Dear Brandon: I am writing to inform you of a cultural resources assessment for the above referenced project and to seek additional information about the project area the Tribe may have that is not readily available through other written sources. The project is located in Section 11, Township 21 North, Range 03 East Willamette Meridian at 31008 39th Place SW in Federal Way, King County, Washington. Joe Yoon is requesting this survey to be used in support of permitting the existing retaining walls and patio, and potential future bulkhead repair on his property at 31008 39th Place SW in Federal Way. We are in the process of reviewing available information. Background research will include a site files search at the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, review of previously recorded cultural resource reports, and review of pertinent published literature and ethnographies. Results of our investigations will be presented in a technical memo. We are aware that not all information is contained within published sources. Should the Tribe have additional information to support our assessment, we would very much like to include it in our study. Please contact me should you wish to provide any comments. I appreciate your assistance in this matter and look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, a46- Sonja Kassa Projects Manager PO Box 10668, BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WA 98110 PHONE 206.855.9020 - infoftmwaxom CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 26 Cultural Resource Consultants February 10, 2015 Suquamish Tribe Stephanie Tnidel PO Box 498 Suquamish, WA 98392-0498 Re: Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, Federal Way, WA Dear Stephanie: l am writing to inform you of a cultural resources assessment for the above referenced project and to seek additional information about the project area the Tribe may have that is not readily available through other written sources. The project is located in Section 11. Township 21 North, Rana 03 Fast Willamette Meridian at 31008 39th Place SW in Federal Way, King County, Washington, Joe Yoon is requesting this survey to be used in support of permitting the existing retaining wails and patio, and potential future bulkhead repair on his property at 31008 39th Place SW in Federal Way. We are in the process of reviewing available information. Background research will include a site files search at the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, review of previously recorded cultural resource reports, and review of pertinent published literature and ethnographies, Results of our investigations will be presented in a technical. memo. We are aware that not all information is contained within published sources. Should the Tribe have additional information to support our assessment, the would very much like to include it in our study. Please contact ore should you wish to provide any comments. I appreciate your assistance in this matter and look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, 5-r- Sonja Kassa Projects X•lanager PO BOX 10668, BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WA 98110 PHONE 206.855.9020 - infoCama.com CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 27 Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Fisheries Depiiif.ittent THE SUQUA NIISli TRIBE PO Bo-i 408 Siu,nuitikl� 991,92 February 11, 2016 Ms. Sonja Kassa Cultural Resource Consultants_, Inc. PO Boa 10668 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 RE: Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, Federal Way, Washington Request for Traditional Cultural Property Inform ation Suquamish Tribe Reference: 16-02-11-01 Dear Sonja: Thank you for consulting with the Suquamish Tribe regarding CRC's cultural resources assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project in Federal Way, Washington. The Tribe does not have any specific concerns or statements about the proposed project at this time. Please contact me at 360-394-8533 or via e-mail atstrudel.r,su uantish.n musasadditionalprojectinformationbecomesavailable. Sincerely, Stephanie E. Trudel Archaeologist Cc: Gretchen Kaehler, Local Government Archaeologist, Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 28 1 Attachment C. Inadvertent discovery protocol. Protocols for Discovery of Archaeological Resources In the event that archaeological resources are encountered during project implementation, the following actions will be taken: In the find location, all ground disturbing activity will stop. The find location will be secured from any additional impacts and the supervisor will be informed. The project proponent will immediately contact the agencies with jurisdiction over the lands where the discovery is located, if appropriate. The appropriate agency archaeologist or the proponent's contracting archaeologist will determine the size of the work stoppage zone or discovery location in order to sufficiently protect the resource until further decisions can be made regarding the work site. The project proponent will consult with DAHP regarding the evaluation of the discovery and the appropriate protection measures, if applicable. Once the consultation has been -completed, and if the site is determined to be NRHP-eligible, the project proponent will request written concurrence from the agency or tribe(s) that the protection and mitigation measures have been fulfilled. Upon notification of concurrence from the appropriate parties, the project proponent will proceed with the project. Within six months after completion of the above steps, the project proponent will prepare a final written report of the discovery. The report will include a description of the contents of the discovery, a summary of consultation, and a description of the treatment or mitigation measures. Protocols for Discovery of Human Remains If human remains are found within the project area, the project proponent, its contractors or permit -holders, the following actions will be taken, consistent with Washington State RCWs 68.50.645, 27.44.055, and 68.60.055: If ground -disturbing activities encounter human skeletal remains during the course of construction then all activity will cease that may cause farther disturbance to those remains. The area of the find will be secured and protected from further disturbance. The proj ect proponent will prepare a plan for securing and protecting exposed human remains and retain consultants to perform these services. The finding of human skeletal remains will be reported to the county medical examiner/coroner and local law enforcement in the most expeditious manner possible. The remains will not be touched, moved, or fiuther disturbed. The county medical examiner/coroner will assume jurisdiction over the human skeletal remains and make a determination of whether those remains are forensic or non -forensic. If the county medical examiner/coroner determines the remains are non -forensic, then they will report that finding to DAHP, which will then take jurisdiction over the remains. DABP will notify any appropriate cemeteries and all affected tribes of the find. The State Physical Anthropologist will make a determination of whether the remains are Indian or Non -Indian and report that finding to any CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 29 appropriate cemeteries and the affected tribes. DAHP will then handle all consultation with the affected parties as to the future preservation, excavation, and disposition of the remains. Lead Re resentative and PiimaEy Contact Duwamish Tribe 4705 W. Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 Primary Contact: Cecile Hansen, Chairwoman, 206-431-1582 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Primary Contact: Laura Murphy, Archaeologist, Cultural Resources, 253-876-3272 Puyallup Tribe of Indians 3009 East Portland Avenue Tacoma, WA 98404 Primary Contact: Brandon Reynon, Cultural Resources, 253-573-7986 Suquamish Tribe PO Box 498 Suquamish, WA 98392-0498 Primary Contact: Dennis Lewarch, THPO Cultural Resources, 360-394-8529 Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Lead Representative: Allyson Brooks, State Historic Preservation Officer, 360-586-3066 Primary Contact: Gretchen Kaehler, Local Government Archaeologist, 360-586-3088 Primary Contact for Human Remains: Guy Tasa, State Physical Anthropologist, 360-586-3534 King County Medical Examiner 908 Jefferson Street Seattle, WA 98104 Primary Contact: Richard Harruff, Medical Officer, 206-731-3232 King County Sheriff 516 Third Avenue, Room W-116 Seattle, WA 98104-2312 Primary Contact: John Urquhart, Sheriff, 206-296-3311 CRC Technical Memorandum #1602F-1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Yoon Bulkhead Project, King County, Washington Page 30 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 21, 2016 TO: Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Vince Faranda, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Planning FOR DRC MTG. ON: SEPA Completeness Review FILE NUMBER(s): 16-105952-SE RELATED FILE NOS.: 16-105951-SH (Shoreline Exemption) 15-102033-AD (Geotechnical Peer Review) 16-105953-SF (On -Hold- retaining walls; bulkhead; work in critical area) 15-105554-VO Previous applications cancelled: 2014 Shoreline Application cancelled; new proposal 2015 Geotechnical Direct Services cancelled PROJECT NAME: Yoon Shoreline Violation Resolution & Bulkhead Repair PROJECT ADDRESS: 31008 39TH PL SW ZONING DISTRICT: RS 15.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental review for the removal of the majority of a series of retaining walls, removal of unstable fill materials, and landscaping paver pathway built without permits pre-2013, to restore shoreline slope to pre -violation conditions. The applicant proposes to restack the existing bulkhead moving landward from the OHWM. Proposal a result of shoreline code violation - 2013 King County Shoreline Survey. SEPA triggered due to work/development activities on lands covered by water (WAC 197-11-800.1.a.i) LAND USE PERMITS: Environmental Review; Shoreline Exemption CONSULTANT: Bill Rehe, Senior Biologist I Leon Consulting 253-389-0712 Rehe@leonenvironmental.com MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Cover Letter Plan Set Clearing/Grading; preliminary landscape plan, existing conditions; site plan; TESC plan, wall removal plan etc. SEPA Submittal Checklist Geotechnical Report, dated November 1, 2016 DARPA Application (see for narrative) MLU Application Existing Conditions Pictures (provided by Planning) RX- EIVED Department of Community Development 33325 P Avenue South CITY of -- Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal Way 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 ►rww,cityoif rallva►.cons SEPIA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for Applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable " or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision -making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 1 of 15 k:\landouts\Environmental Checklist CITY of Federal Way A. BACKGROUND Department of Community Development 33325 8'h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 �e vvw.cih ol7edernl ��•a� .cona 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Yoon Shoreline Violation Resolution and Bulkhead Repair Project 2. Name of applicant: Hyongsop (Joe) Yoon Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 31008 39th PI SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 206-409-7455 4. Date checklist prepared: 11/21/2016 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Before the closure of the authorized work window, Feb 14, 2017. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. JARPA, Master land use application, Shoreline exemption application, engineered plans cultural resources assessment, OHW analysis and geotecnical report. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Yes, an HPA will be required from WDF1N 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. SEPA determination, shoreline exemption and HPA. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 2 of 15 k:\HandoutsTnvironmental Checklist Department of Community Development 33325 8`h Avenue South Cixv of Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Fariam I May 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 ►� r�zv.Ci�ofi�erain a►�om 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The overall goal of this project is to resolve the outstanding shoreline violation with the City of Federal Way and repair and rehabilitate the existing bulkhead. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 31008 39th PI SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Township 21, Range 3, Section 11, NE section B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site: (circle one): Flat, rolling, hill,steep slopes, untainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 40 percent c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam and Alderwood and Kitsap soils (AkF), and Ragnar fine sandy loam (RaD). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Between 30 and 40 cubic yards of fill will be required. The fill will come from an upland source. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion could potential occur, but will be reduced by using BMPs. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 3 of 15 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist 41k Department of Community Development 33325 8h Avenue South CITY OFF Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal Way 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 «%«v.citvoffcdaralw ay.com g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Of the 66,155 square foot lot, approximately 8,000 square feet or 9 percent total will be impervious. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Silt fence will be placed around the perimeter of the project site. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Short term air emssions from a tug, excavator and front loader will occur during construction. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. ►rl c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Low sulfur fuel will be used and no idling of equipment will be allowed. 3. Water a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, Puget Sound 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The project requires in water work will the project area is not inundated by tidal water. Equipment will operate within 25 feet of the existing bulkhead. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. Bulletin 4050 — October 17, 2016 Page 4 of 15 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist CITY OF 4A Federal Way Department of Community Development 33325 8`b Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 ,Lkww.ci[voffodcra1A,av- om 5) Does the proposal he within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Unknown 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Overland runoff may occur but it should be reduced by planting native vegetation. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. Yes. The project will restores drainage patterns that were impacted by the placement of pavers. d.Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: Temporary measures, like straw, silt fence and/or wattles will be used during construction. After the slope is restored, native vegetation will be planted and mulch added to help reduce runoff. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 5 of 15 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist CITY OF Federal Way 4. Plants a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: -AZ-deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs amass pasture Department of Community Development 33325 a Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 %"y%%,. ci tyoffcd Gr 1� 11',7�'. Ci11I1 crop or gram . Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? No addition vegetation will be removed or altered. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The previously impacted slope will be replanted with native vegetation. Please see planting plan. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. None. 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: bil-d aw eron, agle s ongbirds,er: mammals: deer, bear, elk, fish: bass, otiouj effMJ , she sh other: b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered species are known to be on the project site. Bocaccio, canary and yelloweye rock fish, bull trout, steelhead trout, Chinook salmon and southern resident killer whales are found in the Puget Sound. These species will not be negatively impacted by the proposed project. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 6 of 15 Uflandouts\Environmental Checklist CITYOF Federal 'Nay c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Pacific flyway and migratory route for salmon d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Department of Community Development 33325 8"' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 %ti1►�v.ci�-oModera Nvaa�•.coWaco- Relocating the existing bulkhead landward of OHW will reestablish upper intertidal habitat. Native vegetation will attract and benefit wildlife. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None known. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. No known contamination 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. None. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. None. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 7 of 15 k:\landouts\Environmental Checklist Department of Community Development 33325 81" Avenue South ci7r of =� Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal Way 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 ► %vw.citvoffcdcraI►vay.com 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Residential noise and boat traffic 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term: construction equipment noise Long term: None 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. The site is currently used for a single family resdience. The adjacent properties are also used for single family residence. There will be no affects on current land ises on, nearby or adjacent properties. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? No. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No. Bulletin 4050 — October 17, 2016 Page 8 of 15 UHandoutsTrivironmental Checklist CITY OF Federal Way c. Describe any structures on the site. Department of Community Development 33325 W4 Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 ui,.,w.cih,orf ederaE,.vay. com Structure on or adjacent to the marine shoreline include an existing single family residence, outbuilding, foot path, concrete pavers patios, stairs, deck, retaining walls and rock bulkhead. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. The concrete paver patio and all but 495 SF of the paver foot path will be removed. The existing rock bulkhead will be rebuilt, slightly landward above OHW. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RS 15.0 £ What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single Family, Medium Density g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Rural. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. According to the City's Critical Area Map, an erosion and landslide hazard is located on the site. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Four. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N/A in. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: N/A 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. No.change in housing. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 9 of 15 k:lHandouts\Environmental Checklist 4k CITY OF Federal Way Department of Community Development 33325 8`I' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 ���►_<��. c i #rof faderal �� ar. com b. Approximately how many un .its, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high-, middle-, or low-income housing. No change in housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The repaired bulkhead will be approximately 6 feet high. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Boating, fishing and exploring tidelands. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 10 of 15 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist N CITY OF Federal Way Department of Community Development 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 u•��ncir<ffederaiwar.cont b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. No. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. No. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. All work will be done in areas that have been created or disturbed in the last 20 years. Will follow state recommendations for Inadvertent Discovery of Human Skeletal Remains on Non -Federal and Non -Tribal Land in the State of Washington (RCWs 68.50.645, 27.44.055, and 68.60.055) d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. The project will restore the slope to pre -disturbance conditions. We will be removing concrete paver, regrading the slope and planting native vegetation. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. State Route 509 (SW Dash Point Road) b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? There is public transet on State Route 509 Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 11 of 15 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Department of Community Development CITY OF 33325 8`^ Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal Way 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 uivnv. citva ffedcral-%vav, cons c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed projector non -project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? None. Parking will not change. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? if so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed projector proposal? if known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? It would not change because of the proposed project. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? if so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: sanitary sewer,teptic system, other Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 12 of 15 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist L%4m GTV OF Federal Way Department of Community Development 33325 a Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 %yyny. cit-yoffedgralway.cont b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The propsed project will not effect the utilities. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature:94 A Name of Signee: Bill Rehe Position and Agency/Organization: Project biologist Date Submitted: 12/11 /2016 Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 13 of 15 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Department of Community Development 33325 8`h Avenue South Ciro OF � Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal Way 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 u-►%w cici tvoff�erzli�. co�bco�b A SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 14 of 15 UHandoutsTnvironmental Checklist Department of Community Development 33325 8'h Avenue South CITY of "�•-'-� Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal Way 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 ►v►► %v.aitvoffederal►va►_.com 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 15 of 15 k:HandoutsTuvironmental Checklist CITY OF Federal Way DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Yoon Slope Remediation and Bulkhead Repair File No: 16-105952-00-SE Proposal: Proposed existing bulkhead restacking approximately 100 feet long and 5 feet in height landward of the ordinary high water mark. Other work includes removing landscaping pavers and geologically hazardous area stabilization with vegetation on a site along Puget Sound. Proponent: William G. Rehe Jr., 8305 Dogwood Ln. NW, Gig Harbor, WA 98332 Location: 31008 39' Pl. SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way, Community Development Department Project Contact: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Associate Planner, 253-835-2644 Email: Leita.Willoughby-OakesAcityoffederalway.com FELL Subject Property The lead agency for this proposal has determined the proposals do not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist submitted by the staff project manager, the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, other municipal policies, plans, rules and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act pursuant to RCW 43.31 C.110. This information is available to the public on request. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request from the Community Development Department. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on January 27, 2017. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Pursuant to FWRC 14.10.060(3), any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the Federal Way City Clerk (33325 8a` Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003) no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 17, 2017, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to state specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Brian Davis Title: Director of Community Development, City of Federal Way Address: 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Phone: 253-835-2612 1- Date Issued: January 13, 2017 Signature: Doc. I.D. 75146 CITY {1F Yoon Slope Restoration & Bulkhead Repair o:k Federal Way 31008 39 th Pl . SW This map is intended for use as a graphical repnesentaiion one The City of Federal Way makes no warranty W its accuracy_ Vicinity Map 39tC7 Pf_ N j�. Subject Property File #16-105951-00-SH & 15-105952-00-SE 0 220 0 880 Feet Dame Prepared- 1112f2D17 Doc I.D.75208 RrICE /ED F931 y US Army Corps WASHINGTON STATE sof eat11e 01wats Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA) Form1,2 USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN THE WHITE SPACES BELOW. ------------------------------------- Date received: r CITY OF FEDERAL WAN e e M7 r Agency reference #: t Tag Parcel #(s): --------------------------------------I Part 1—Project Identification 1. Project Name (A name for your project that you create. Examples: Smith's Dock or Seabrook Lane Development) h[ 2AI Yoon Shoreline Violation Resolution and Bulkhead Repair Project Part 2—Applicant The person and/or organization responsible for the project. hel 2a. Name (fast, First, Middle) Yoon, Hyongsop (Joe) 2b. Organization (If applicable) 2c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 31008 39th PI SW 2d. City, State, Zip Federal Way, WA 98023 2e. Phone (1) 2f. Phone (2) 2 . Fax 2h. E-mail 206-409-7455 ( ) hsjyoon@yahoo.com Additional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authortzation through a Regional General Permit (RGP), contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for application information (206) 764-3495. • If your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act, you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form (SPIF) or prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at hit :llwww.nws.usace.arm .miYPublicMenulManu.cfrn 7sitename=REG& a Qename=main page ESA • Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits. It you need a Shoreline permit, contact the appropriate city or county government to make sure they accept the JARPA. 2To access an online JARPA form with [help] screens, go to hit Ihvww.e errrlittin .wa. ovlsitelalias r sourcecenterfia a larpa form19984liaroa form.asox. For other help, contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at 1-800-917-0043 or JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 1 of 14 Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note: Authorized agent(s) must sign 11 b of this application.) heI 3a. Name (Last, First, Middle) Rehe, William 3b. Organization (If applicable) 3c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 8305 Dogwood Lane NW 3d. City, State, Zip Gig Harbor, WA 98332 3e. Phone (1) 3f. Phone (2) 253-389-0712 ( ) Part 4—Property Owner(s) 3 Fax 3h. E-mail ( ) rehe@leon-environmental.com Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies) where the project will occur. Consider both upland and aquatic ownership because the upland owners may not own the adjacent aquatic land. h[ eM ® Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights -of -way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ There are multiple upland property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. ❑ Your project is on Department of Natural Resources (DNR)-managed aquatic lands. If you don't know, contact the DNR at (360) 902-1100 to determine aquatic land ownership. If yes, complete JARPA Attachment E to apply for the Aquatic Use Authorization. 4a. Name (Last, First, Middle) 4b. Organization (If applicable) 4c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 4d. City, State, Zip 4e. Phone (t) 4f. Phone (2) 4 . Fax 4h. E-mail JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 2 of 14 Part 5—Project Location(s) Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. hel ❑ There are multiple project locations (e.g. linear projects). Complete the section below and use DARPA Attachment B for each additional project location. 5a. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Check all that apply.) hel ® Private ❑ Federal ❑ Publicly owned (state, county, city, special districts like schools, ports, etc.) ❑ Tribal ❑ Department of Natural Resources (DNR) — managed aquatic lands (Complete JARPA Attachment 5b. Street Address (Cannot be a PO Box. If there is no address, provide other location information in 5p.) h[_ U 31008 39th PI SW 5c. City, State, Zip (If the project is not in a city or town, provide the name of the nearest city or town.) hei Federal Way, WA 98023 5d. County h[ el King 5e. Provide the section, township, and range for the project location. hei '/4 Section �� Section Township Range NE 11 21 5f. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location. Lbfjo • Example: 47.03922 N lat. /-122.89142 W long. (Use decimal degrees - NAD 83) 47.326121 0/-122.3820060 5g. List the tax parcel number(s) for the project location. heel � • The local county assessor's office can provide this information. 7582000070 3 5h. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. (If you need more space, use JARPA Attachment C.)[tgipl Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel # (if known) ELLINGSON, DAVID 31006 39TH AVE SW 7582000080 L+KATHARINE Federal Way, WA 98023 STALDER, CHAD E+CARRIE M 31010 39TH PL SW 7582000060 Federal Way, WA 98023 JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 3 of 14 Si. List all wetlands on or adjacent to the project location. hei Adjacent to Estuarine Intertidal Aquatic Bed/Unconsolidated Shore, Regularly Flooded (E2USN) 5j. List all waterbodies (other than wetlands) on or adjacent to the project location. [helps Dumas Bay, Puget Sound 5k. Is any part of the project area within a 100-year floodplain? MM ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 51. Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property. hei Vegetation within the 50 foot setback has largely been removed and replaced with pavers. Native riparian species have ben replaced with lawn, landscaping plants and English ivy. There are a few, small red alders along the northern property line. Habitat waterward of OHW is composed mostly of cobble over a sand base that transitions to mudflat. There is a large amount of angular rock that has become dislodged from the bulkhead. According to WDFW Forage Fish Spawning Map, no documented surf smelt, sand lance, or herring spawning has occurred at or adjacent to the project site. No large wood debris was on the beach. Ecology maps patchy eelgrass offshore of the Yoon property. 5m. Describe how the property is currently used. hei The property currently is used as a single family residence. 5n. Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. hf eM The adjacent properties are also used for single family residences. 5o. Describe the structures (above and below ground) on the property, including their purpose(s) and current condition. h[ eM Structure on or adjacent to the marine shoreline include an existing single family residence, outbuilding, foot path, concrete pavers patios, stairs, deck, retaining walls and rock bulkhead. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 4 of 14 5p. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location, and attach a map. hel From Interstate 5: Take S 312th St to SW Dash Point Rd Turn left onto SW Dash Point Rd Turn right to stay on SW Dash Point Rd Turn left to stay on SW Dash Point Rd Turn right onto 39th Ave SW Destination is on the right. Part 6—Project Description 6a. Briefly summarize the overall project. You can provide more detail in 6b. hel The overall goal of this project is to resolve the outstanding shoreline violation with the City of Federal Way and repair and rehabilitate the existing bulkhead. 6b. Describe the purpose of the project and why you want or need to perform it. hel Mr. Yoon is proposing to resolve an outstanding shoreline violation with the City of Federal Way by removing the pavers and fill material placed within the shoreline jurisdiction without permits. The shoreline will be restored by regrading the slope, replanting native vegetation and reducing the size and area of the paver path to pre -violation conditions. The existing bulkhead will be repair and rehabilitate in order to restore the structure to a state comparable to its original condition. Wind and wave action has led to the current condition. We are proposing to restack the existing bulkhead in a more vertical alignment landward of OHW. 6c. Indicate the project category. (check all that apply) hel ❑ Commercial ® Residential ❑ Institutional ❑ Transportation ❑ Recreational ❑ Maintenance ❑ Environmental Enhancement 6d. Indicate the major elements of your project. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑ Aquaculture ❑ Bank Stabilization ❑ Boat House ❑ Boat Launch ❑ Boat Lift ❑ Bridge ® Bulkhead ❑ Buoy ❑ Channel Modification ❑ Culvert ❑ Dam / Weir ❑ Dike / Levee / Jetty ❑ Ditch ❑ Dock / Pier ❑ Dredging ❑ Fence ❑ Ferry Terminal ❑ Fishway ® Other: Slope stabilization and restoration ❑ Float ❑ Floating Home ❑ Geotechnical Survey ❑ Land Clearing ❑ Marina / Moorage ❑ Mining ❑ Outfall Structure ❑ Piling/Dolphin ❑ Raft ❑ Retaining Wall (upland) ❑ Road ❑ Scientific Measurement Device ❑ Stairs ❑ Stormwater facility ❑ Swimming Pool ❑ Utility Line JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 5 of 14 6e. Describe how you plan to construct each project element checked in 6d. Include specific construction methods and equipment to be used. hi ell • Identify where each element will occur in relation to the nearest waterbody. Indicate which activities are within the 100-year floodplain. Equipment and material will be brought in by barge. The equipment will operate in a 25 foot work corridor directly in front of the existing bulkhead. Existing bulkhead rock will be restacked and embedded approximately 1.5 feet below grade, landward of OHW. The pavers and paver base fill material will be removed and reused or disposed of offsite. The slope will be regraded as illustrated in the plans. A replacement trail, consisting of approximately 495 square feet of impervious surface within the 50 foot shoreline setback, will be constructed in the previous location. The regraded slope soils will be amended and replanted with native vegetation. After completion of the repair and rehabilitate of the existing bulkhead, manmade debris and dislodged bulkhead rock will be removed from the beach and beach nourishment material placed as required by WDFW. 6f. What are the anticipated start and end dates for project construction? (MonthNear) [hel • If the project will be constructed in phases or stages, use JARPA Attachment D to list the start and end dates of each phase or stage. Start date: As soon as permits are received and tides allow work. End date: 3 weeks from start date. ❑ See JARPA Attachment D 6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. hf eM $42,500 6h. Will any portion of the project receive federal funding? h[ e • If yes, list each agency providing funds. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Don't know Part 7—Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation ❑ Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.) help] 7a. Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. hMM ❑ Not applicable 7b. Will the project impact wetlands? hf eM JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 6 of 14 ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7c. Will the project impact wetland buffers? IDLIM ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? hel • If Yes, submit the report, including data sheets, with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System? LbLeM . If Yes, submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7f. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for any adverse impacts to wetlands? hel • If Yes, submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 7g. o If No, or Not applicable, explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. LLeM 7h. Use the table below to list the type and rating of each wetland impacted, the extent and duration of the impact, and the type and amount of mitigation proposed. Or if you are submitting a mitigation plan with a similar table, you can state (below) where we can find this information in the plan. hel Activity (fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain, excavate, Name' type and area (sq. of impact3 mitigation mitigation area flood, etc.) rating ft. or type" (sq. ft. or category2 Acres) acres) 'If no official name for the wetland exists, create a unique name (such as "Wetland V). The name should be consistent with other project documents, such as a wetland delineation report. 2 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System. Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. I Indicate the days, months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity. Enter "permanent" if applicable. 'Creation (C), Re-establishment/Rehabilitation (R), Enhancement (E), Preservation (P), Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee (B) Page number(s) for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 7 of 14 71. For all filling activities identified in 7h, describe the source and nature of the fill material, the amount in cubic yards that will be used, and how and where it will be placed into the wetland. hf eM 7j. For all excavating activities identified in 7h, describe the excavation method, type and amount of material in cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. h[ elf] Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non -wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) h[ gm ® Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. hLegl ❑ Not applicable The contractor will avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the project area by working during the authorized regulatory agency "work windows". The project was designed to minimize adverse impacts by working within a 25 foot work corridor, only working in the dry at low tide and not stock piling fine grain material below MHHW. The barge will not ground out in any aquatic vegetation and the tug will operate in a manner to reduce prop wash. 8b. Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a waterbody? [hep] ®Yes ❑No 8C. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for the project's adverse impacts to non -wetland waterbodies? hf do JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 8 of 14 • If Yes, submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 8d. + If No, or Not applicable, explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Not applicable 8d. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish. Describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. • If you already completed 7g you do not need to restate your answer here. h[�] No mitigation plan has been prepared, but mitigation is being proposed. The existing bulkhead will be restacked landward of OHW, reestablishing upper intertidal habitat. The stairs will be inset into the bulkhead in order to not encroach on the beach. Habitat mix gravel will be spread in front of the repaired bulkhead, as required by WDFW. 8e. Summarize impact(s) to each waterbody in the table below. [heipi Activity (clear, Waterbody Impact Duration Amount of material Area (sq. ft. or dredge, fill, pile namel location2 of impact3 (cubic yards) to be linear ft.) of drive, etc.) placed in or waterbody removed from directly affected waterbody Restack and Puget Sound Adjacent -7-10 - 40 cubic yards -100' x 3' (300 repair rock days sq. ft.) bulkhead Upland fill Puget Sound I Adjacent -7-10 -30 to 40 cubic yards None ' If no official name for the waterbody exists, create a unique name (such as "Stream 1°) The name should be consistent with other documents provided. 2Indicate whether the impact will occur in or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent, provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and indicate whether the impact will occur within the 100-year flood plain. 3Indicate the days, months or years the waterbody will be measurably impacted by the work- Enter"permanent" if applicable, 8f. For all activities identified in 8e, describe the source and nature of the fill material, amount (in cubic yards) you will use, and how and where it will be placed into the waterbody. hel Bulkhead rock and upland fill will be imported from an upland source. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 9 of 14 8g. For all excavating or dredging activities identified in Be, describe the method for excavating or dredging, type and amount of material you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. hel No dredging will occur. A toe trench approximately 100' long by 3' wide will be excavated in order to place the bulkhead rock above OHW. Part 9-Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. 9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. Leiel Agency Name Contact Name Phone Most Recent Date of Contact City of Federal Way i Leila Willoughby -Oakes 253-835-2644 11/8/2016 9b. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 of this JARPA on the Washington Department of Ecology's 303(d) List? h[ elp] ■ If Yes, list the parameter(s) below. If you don't know, use Washington Department of Ecology's Water Quality Assessment tools at: http-llwww.epX.wa.gov/prourams&vq/303dl, ❑ Yes ® No 9c. What U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code (HUC) is the project in? h[ gd ■ Go to httg:1/cfpub.epa.govlsurfllocate/index.cfm to help identify the HUC. 17110019 9d. What Water Resource Inventory Area Number (WRIA #) is the project in? heel ,] ■ Go to htjpl/wwW.pa.wa.gov/services/gisti-napsAAfria/wha.litm to find the WRIA#. WRIA 10 9e. Will the in -water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? hel ■ Go to lilt :Ilwww.ec .wa, ovl ro rams/w !sw slcriteria.html for the standards. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 10 of 14 ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, what is the local shoreline environment designation? [hel • If you don't know, contact the local planning department. • For more information, go to: htt :llwww.ec .wa. ov! ro ramslsealsrnallaws rulesl173-261211 desi nations.html. ® Rural ❑ Urban ❑ Natural ❑ Aquatic ❑ C.onservancy ❑ Other 9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type?[Leipj • Go to htt :llwwdv.dnr.wa. ❑vIBusinessPermitsfTo ics/ForestPracticesA licationsIPa eslfp watertyping.aspA forthe Forest Practices Water Typing System. ® Shoreline ❑ Fish ❑ Non -Fish Perennial ❑ Non -Fish Seasonal 9h. Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual? [help] • If No, provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. ® Yes ❑ No Name of manual: Western Washington Manual 9L Does the project site have known contaminated sediment? hhee • If Yes, please describe below. ❑ Yes ® No 9j. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below. hel Vacant land before developed. 9k. Has a cultural resource (archaeological) survey been performed on the project area? hem • If Yes, attach it to your JARPA package. ® Yes ❑ No 91. Name each species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project area or might be affected by the proposed work. hel JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 11 of 14 The following species can be found in the Puget Sound. There will be no effect on these species by the proposed work is expected. Bocaccio rockfish (Sebastes paucispinis) — Endangered Bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) - Threatened Canary rockfish (Sebastes pinniger) - Threatened Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) (Puget Sound) - Threatened Marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) - Threatened Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Puget Sound DIPS) - Threatened Stellar sea -lion (Eumotopias jubatus) (Stellar eastern population) — Threatened Southern resident killer whale (Orcinus orca )(Southern Resident DIPS) - Endangered Yelloweye rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus) — Threatened 9m. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species List that might be affected by the proposed work. hl eM According to WDFW's Priority Habitats and Species List Interactive Online Mapper, estuarine and marine intertidal habitat is located adjacent to the project site. Part 10—SEPA Compliance and Permits Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. ■ Online Project Questionnaire at http:flapps.ecy_wa.gov/opas/. ■ Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at (800) 917-0043 or help-@ora.wa.gov. • For a list of addresses to send your JARPA to, click on agency addresses for completed DARPA. 10a. Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). (check all that apply.) h[ eM ■ For more information about SEPA, go to www.ecy.wa.pov)programslsealsepate-review.html. ❑ A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. ® A SEPA determination is pending with City of Federal Way (lead agency). The expected decision date is ❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (check the box below in 1 ob.) h[ el ❑ This project is exempt (choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code (WAC) is it exempt? ❑ Other: ❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. 10b. Indicate the permits you are applying for. (Check all that apply.) hf eipl JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 12 of 14 LOCAL, GOVERNMENT Local Government Shoreline permits: ❑ Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance ® Shoreline Exemption Type (explain): WAG 173-27-040 Other citylcounty permits: ❑ Floodplain Development Permit ❑ Critical Areas Ordinance STATE GOVERNMENT Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: ® Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption — Attach Exernotion Form Effective July 10, 2012, you must submit a check for $150 to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, unless your project qualifies for an exemption or alternative payment method below. Do not send cash. Check the appropriate boxes: ❑ $150 check enclosed. (Check# ) Attach check made payable to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. ❑ Charge to billing account under agreement with WDFW. (Agreement ## ❑ My project is exempt from the application fee. (Check appropriate exemption) ❑ HPA processing is conducted by applicant -funded WDFW staff. (Agreement ## _ ) ❑ Mineral prospecting and mining. ❑ Project occurs on farm and agricultural land. (Attach a copy of current land use classification recorded with the county auditor, or other proof of current land use.) ❑ Project is a modification of an existing HPA originally applied for, prior to July 10, 2012. (HPA ## Washington Department of Natural Resources: ❑ Aquatic Use Authorization Complete JAR PA Attachment E and submit a check for $25 payable to the Washington Department of Natural Resources. Do not send cash. Washington Department of Ecology: ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification FEDERAL. GOVERNMENT United States Department of the Army permits (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): ❑ Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) ❑ Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: ❑ General Bridge Act Permit ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non -bridge projects) JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 13 of 14 Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures are required before submitting the JARPA package. The JARPA package includes the JARPA form, project plans, photos, etc. heeM 11a. Applicant Signature (required) he[�i I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to cant' out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. I hereby authori a the agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. (initial) By initialing here, I state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also give my consent to the permitting agencies entenng�tthe property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. (initial) Applicant Printed Name Applicant Signature Date 11 b. Authorized Agent Signature hel I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have been issued. William Rehe 1 2//y /I � Authorized Agent Printed Name Authorized Agent Signatu Date 11c. Property Owner Signature (if not applicant). h[ gid Not required if project is on existing rights -of -way or easements. I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. Property Owner Printed Name Property Owner Signature Date 18 U.S.0 §1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact or makes any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. If you require this document in another format, contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance (ORA) at (800) 917-0043. People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. People with a speech disability can call (877) 833-6341. ORA publication number: ENV-019-09 rev. 06-12 JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 14 of 14 I-1 December 14, 2016 Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner City of Federal Way Dept. of Community Development 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 RE: Yoon Shoreline Violation Resolution and Bulkhead Repair Project Dear Mrs. Willoughby -Oakes, Please find the attached application material for the Yoon Shoreline Violation Resolution and Bulkhead Repair Project. We are applying for a shoreline exemption under Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-27-040 (2)b. We feel the restoration of the disturbed slope to its previous configuration and the repair and rehabilitation of the existing bulkhead, to restore the structure to a state comparable to its original condition, meets the requirements for an exemption from substantial development pen -nit requirement. The repair of the existing bulkhead is needed to stabilize the toe of the slope so the restoration activities have a stable foundation to prevent movement to the hillside. We feel these repairs will not cause substantial adverse effects to the shoreline resources or environment. The proposed project was designed to reduce existing adverse impacts by restoring and reestablishing previously impacted habitat. The existing, legally established bulkhead was constructed several feet below Ordinary High Water (OHW). We are proposing to restack the damaged and deteriorating rock bulkhead landward of OHW. This will reestablish approximately 300 square feet of upper intertidal habitat. Regrading and replanting the impacted slope with native vegetation will enhance stormwater retention and provide habitat for shoreline birds and wildlife. We are also applying for a SEPA determination with the City of Federal Way. Please find the required material attached. Application Submittal Material 1. A Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application that contains the information required by FWRC 15.05.140 2. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) submittal requirements: We request your review and comments on this proposed project. Please contact me at 253-389-0712 if you have any questions. Thank you for your time and assistance. 0 i:o16 CITY OF101:�� CfOF FL ryDE L WAY Federal Way c"` APPLICATION NO(S) Project Name MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF CommuNiTY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 ww w.c i tvo f fcd a m I wad:. cam_ I0 10,5 CTv z ^ 0 U ~ s Date 11 /21 /2016 Yoon Shoreline Violation Resolution and Bulkhead Repair Project Property Address/Location Parcel Number(s) Project Description PLEASE PRINT 31008 39th PI SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 7582000070 The overall goal of this project is to resolve the outstanding shoreline violation with the City of Federal Way and repair and rehabilitate the existing bulkhead. Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI -Z%,SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information RS15.0 pp�� Zoning Designation Single Family, MC imfp ellens ve Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements j �Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type Construction Type Applicant Name: Hyongsop (Joe) Yoon Address: 31008 39th PI SW City/State: Federal WA Zip: 98023 Phone: 206-409-7455 Fax: Email: hsjyoon@yahoo.com Signature'` Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: William G Rehe Jr Address: 8305 Dogwood Ln. NW City/State: Gig Harbor, WA Zip: 98332 Phone: 253-389-0712 Fax: Email: rehe@leon- nvironmental .com Signature Owner Name: Same as Applicant Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Bulletin #003 -January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application