Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
20-100024
CITY OF � Federal Way February 24, 2020 Michelle Henry 35001 NE 1471h Avenue Yacolt, INA 98675 p.m. development@oullook. com Re: File #20-100024-00-PC, PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY Henry - Reasonable Use, 33305 43ra Avenue SW, Federal Way Dear Mrs. 1-lenry: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cit yoffederal wry com dirn Ferrel, Mayor Thank you for participating in the preapplication conference with the City of Iledcral Way's Development Review Committee (D.Rq held January 30, 2020. We hope that the information discussed at that meeting was helpful in understanding the general requirements for your project as submitted. This Ictter summarizes Comments given to you at the meeting by the members of the DRC. 7lie members who reviewed your project and provided comments include staff from the City's Planning and Builditig Divisions, Public Works Department, and represt-ntatives from I,akehaven Water and SeNver District and South King Fire and Rescue. Some sections of the Federal VV Reviser! Code (I�WRC) and relevant 'information handouts are enclosed with this letter. Please be advised, this letter does not represesit all applicable codes. In preparing your formal application, please refer to the complete FNXIRC and other relevant codes forall additional requirements that may apply to your project. The key contact for your project is, Becky Chapin, 253-835-2641, becky.chapiit@}u cityoffederalway.corn. For specific technical questions about your project, please contact the appropriate DRC representative as listed below. Otherwise, any general questions about the preapplication and permitting process can be xefetred to your key contact. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed 2,475 square foot single family residence on a lot encumbered by a stream, stream buffers, wetlands and wetland buffers. MAJOR I5SUE5 Outlined below is a summary of the major issues of your project based on the plans and information submitted for preapplication review. These issues can change due to modifications and revisions in the plans. The major issues section is only provided as a means to highlight critical requirements or issues. Please be sure to read the comments made by all departments in the follo-,--mg section of this letter. * Planning Division 1. The current proposal does not MME she required 20-font front yard setback. An administrative variance of up to 25% of the meusura.ble standard can be granted via Use Process III, otherwise Use Process IV wril[ be required for the proposed front yard setback intrusion. 2. Use Process III is required for reasonable use al the property due to need for wetland buffer intrusion. 3. Use Process III and SEPA is required for the proposed stream crossing for sewer service. 4. Use Process III is required for the proposed stream buffer intrusion. Y Public Works Traffic Division 1. Transportation Concurrency Management (FWRC 19.90) -A Transportation concurrency pe.tnnit with application fee of 31,773.00 (1 - 10 Trips) is required for the proposed piraject- 2. Traffic Impact Fees (FWRC 19.91) - Traffic impac.r fees are required for each residential dwelling unit and will be assessed at building permit stage. 3. Improvements (FWRC 19.135.040) - Construct private road easement to Public street standard from the property to the nearest right-of-way. 4. Intersection Sight Distance. - Submit intersection sight distance analysis consistent with AASHTO standard. Building Division 1. A building code cycle change -will occur on July P', 2020. Therefore, any submittals after June 30, 2020, will be reviewed with for compliance with the 2018 International Residential Code [ R(.) and/or the 2018 International Building Code (IBC). South King Fite and Rescue 1. A-ccess to lot is less than 20 feet wide and an approved turnaround is not provided, 2. Fire sprinklers ARE required due to limited access and no approved turnaround. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Outlined below are the comments made by the representatives of each department present at the preapplication conference. Each section should be read thoroughly. If you have questions, please contact the representative listed for that section. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING DIVISION Becky Chapin, 253-835-2641, becky,chapin@cityoffederalway.com 1. Land Use Review Process - The subject property is in the Single hamily Residential (RS 15.0) zone. The RS 15.0 zoning district permits detached dwelling units pursuant to FWRC 19.200.010. There are no required Iand use review processes for a single-family home; a residential building permit is required. I•loNvever, a structure that is proposed within a wetland buffer, stream buffer, includes a stream crossing and front yard setback variance must be applied for through separate Process Ill, Pmjoa_ pprovul and potential Process IV, Hearing £�'Vdminerrespectively. 'floe proposed 2,475 square foot sing le. -family msicfcntial footprint proposed is utilizing a five-foot front yard setback. Within the. 16I5.0 zone, a 20-foul (remit yard setback is required. If the current proposed building footprint is submitted, a Process ILA application will be required to receive a r:rirance to the required front yard setback, If the building fcsotpriut is redLICU_i or rdoe-ated further Back and die sctbnck variance does. not exceed 25 percent of the momsurable standard, all admintstrauve variance can be applied for undera. ]process II] application. Variance decision criteri-a arc con Iailled in 1 1 °RC 19:15.030. The. applicant must provide a writtenmspunsc oen how each of the Variance criteria are met with the submittal. 20-IODD29-00. PC i3cnry Rr:�wrxL€c Un: Pa;�e 2 of It 1Doe ID 80032 Reasonable we of the strliject property to allow for intrusion into the wetland buffer is processed using a Process III' for single family residential lots, pursuant to the review criteria contained in FWRC 19.145.090(3)(a)-(e). The proposed rlrevnnr cra3Fing for sewer connections is processed using t Process III application pursuant to tlae review criteria contained in FWRC 19.145.320 with particular emphasis on (2`)(�,) related to udlity underground crossings. The proposed ,oim-41v !xr(rer hif nrxion is processed using a Process III Application pursuant to the review criteria contained in 1--\\'R[: 19.145.330(3)W,-(0 including a buffer enhancement plate to denlonstralc that the remaining and enhanced buffer will Function at an equivalent or higher level than the standard buffer. The enhancement plan shall address criteria provided in FWRC 19.145.330(a)-(f). Process IV is an adminuta:itive review conducted by city staff per nXRC (;hapter 19.70, with a final decision issued by the Hearing li:xaniiner following a pul)lic hcarin ;. The Process IV decision criteria are cotit:tined in BYRC 19.70.150(2)(a)-(0- See FWkC Chapter 'I9.145 for additional requirements. A Process IV :application can be avoided by increasing your proposed front yntd setback to 15 feet, which will lie• allowed to apply for a Process III. adnunistrative variance as thi. would not exceed 25 percent of the measurable standard per FWRC 19.45.015(1). Per FWRC 19.45.015(2), an additional notice of impending decision shall be issued per 17WRC 19.65.070 at least 15 days prior to the director's decision. '11te land use approvals will be reviewed sander one application per F'WRC: 19..15.060. If the Process IV front yard setback variance is applied for all of the applications shall be subject to the highest level of process that applies to any of the individual applications, i.e. Process IV. Process III is an administrasive review conducted by city staff per 7- WRC Chapter 19.65, and the Director of Community Development will make the initial land use decision based on written comments and informat.5on. Slane Environnjeutcd PolicyAet (SEPA) review is processed concurren dywith Process III Or IV applications, with initial public notice of application being issued after determination of complete applications. hollowing issuance of a SEPA decision, the Hearing Examiner conducts a public hearing for a Process Iti% application and issues a written decision. Process III and IV" development submittal req-iirement checklists and master land use applications are enclosed. Build ng permits can be issued after laud use approval and a SEPA determination;-,:--, granted and appeafperiods concluded. 2 St;ate r►virnrrrrrerirel Policy Act (SEPA) --The progCct is subject to ealvironmcntal rCvitiv under the State rltniroizmeWa N14yAct (I.F.P 1) as the propcx ed development will be undertaken partly on lands co vurvd by waver pursuant to Washigr ,Ion A.dminisxra r)e Ode (WAC) 197-11-500(1)(a)(i). l'Ete City serves as the Responsible Official for nc� environmental review and an environmental checklist r aust be submitted and revie-,ved prior to the City issuing an environmental threshold determination. Jul property owners within 300 feet of the site are notified of that decision. The notification includes a I4-day comment and 21-day appeal period. SEPA review must be concluded before land use approval may be granted. 'Fhe City's critical area mapping depicts a Category it (old=rating systeln) wetland encumbering a majority of the subject property., The PhI11ning Division recornmends you clelincatte the wetl:utcl hcxtndarjes and classily lire o� ealand 1�1` submittjnK to the stud}` for review by the eitl's third -party consul[<tsu before sulantlitting your Laid ttse ,:pinliccaions. W\ band reports are valid for five }-ears pursuant to t,\X'RC 19.145AI0 and the approval federal "V01alld LI( 11I1C';itli)Ia nn;ta;ual, after such elate the City shall determine whether a revision or additional assessment is necessary. 'lla• e 3,X1 ' •� Do- I W032 "a.rifiilfi2.i_ti0-PC1 Henry Rz�s mnUlc <<�e � • K 3. Public Notification — The Use Process application and SEPA determination -requires three separate notices (Notice of Application, Notice of SEPA Detemuna.tion, and Notice of Impending Decision or Notice of Public Hearing, depending on avhich Variance process is applied for, if any). Within 14 days of issuing the Letter of Complete Application, a Notice of Application will be published in the I'eelval Way Mirmr, mailed to persons within 300 feet of the subject property, posted on the subject property, and priced at the City's three designated notice boards. The applicant is responsible for posting a public notification sign prepared by the City. Notice will be given in the same format for the City's SEPA determination and Notice of Irnpending Decision 15 days prior to the Directo?s decision or Notice of Public Hearing 14 days prior to the decision or public hearing date. The applicant is required to submit three (3) sets of stamped mailing envelopes to persons receiving tax statements within 300 feet of the subject property. Two (2) sets ofstampcd mailing envelopes will be required if the Variance process can be avoided. The City's GIS Division provides this service for a nominal fee or the applicant may provide their own mailing envelopes via Icing County Assessor records or a title company. Pleasc find the enclosed mailing labels bulletin for further information. 4. Clearing, Grading, Tree and Vegetation Retention —The proposal is subject to the provisions of F\X/RC 19.120, "Clearing, Grading, and Vegetation and Tree Retention." A clearing and grading plan that meets F`xIRC 19.120.020 and FWRC 19.120.040 must be submitted with the formal land use applications. The site is subject to tree density requirements of PWRC 19.120.130(1); note that 25 tree -units per acre arc required for an RS15.0 zoned site, minus any proposed public or private streets and regulated critical areas. Trees located within critical area buffers (but not within the wetland or stream themselves) can be credited towards satisfying the tree units per acre requirement. "free. unit credits are found in Table 2 of FWRC 19.120.130-2. A tree unit is a value assigned to existixig trees, retained on the property or replacement trees. 17he larger the tree, the greater value it is assigned. Required tree density can be composed of retained trees and replacement plantings per F%RC 19.120.130. The tree and vegetation plan inust clearly show where the tree units are to be located. 'T'he tree and vegetation retention/ replicetncnt plan trust be prepared by a certified arborist or certified landscape architect and must include information about tree unit credits and replacement. The subject property is densely forested and contains a wetland. Pursuant to F VRC 19.120.010 the City discourages the indiscriminate removal or.destruction of trees and vegetation or other natural features, which sliall be preserved to the maximum extent possible. Any fixture clearing, grading, or tree removal actions on the subject property require City approvals. 5. Environmentally Critical Areas —The subject property contains critical areas and/or associated buffers: wetlands and a stream. Pursuant to FX•'RC 19.145.080, a critical area report that adequately evaluates the proposal and probable impacts is required. Tire report must also demonstrate that all reasonable efforts have been examined with the intent to avoid and minimize impacts to the critical areas per MVkC MI43.130 "_Mitigation Sequencing." The applicant is responsible for covering the cost of the City's consultants who may review the reports pet FWRC 19.145.080(3). IYretlands — Delineation and rating; of the on -site wetland v4ill be required to determine the exact impacts to the wetland and wetland buffer. The application shall identify and characterirc all wetlands and buffer; on and within 225 feet of the subject property [AVRC 19.145.410(1)(e)]. See F%RC 19.145.410-420 for wetland delineation and rating standards. The construction of a single-family residence, as proposed, would intrude into the wetland buffer. Ordinarily, your next step would be to request a reduction of the wetland buffer in accordance with FWRC UUC It) 8fX»1 N-1000V-00-pc limey Re wn,.hie €is_ Pageof I � 19.145.440(6). However. the maximum reduction allowed under that section is 25 percent and it appears the house improvements would intrude more than that; the exact amount of int:nision is unknown at this time. l�car«t: 1� c tlsc- of the 5uhit:ct 1'Yop •r —The provisions of FDURC Chapter 19.145 may be modified or waived on a case -by -case basis if tl-reir implementation would deprive an applicant of all reasonable use of the subject property. Pursuant to FWRC 19.145.090, an applicant may apply for a modification or waiver of provisions of this chapter using Process III land use review. The City may approve. a Reasonable Use request based on the following criteria: a) The application of the provisions of this chapter eluninates all reasonable use of the subject property; b) No feasible and reasonable on -site alternatives to the proposal arc possible, such as changes to site laGOirt and/or reduction of impervious improvements; c) It is solely the implementation of this chapter, and no other factors, that preclude all reasonable use of the subject property; ci) The applicant has in no way created or exacerbated the condition that forms the limitation on the use of the subject property, nor in any way contributed to such limitation; and e) The waiver Or modification will not lead to, create, nor signiftcantlq increase the risk of injury or death to any person or damage to improvements on or off the subject property. Any approval or waiver of requirements must be the minimum possible impacts to the function and values and%or risks associated Ninth proposed improvements on affected critical areas. The City may impose limitations, mitigation under an approved mitigation plan, conditions, and/or restrictions it considers appropriate to reduce or eliminate any undesirable effects or adverse impacts of granting a request under this section. Stream.— A critical area report vv ll be required to determine the NVashington .Department of Natural Resources water typing and stream buffer on the so rtheastern corner of the prope.rh. (1�i�RC '19A45.260- 275). Any development crossing the stream shall be considered as development on lairds covered by water. Stre.aatt —The City will review and decide upon the stream crossing using Process II1 land use review. Responses to decisional criteria and design requirements shall be included in the critical area report. New stream crossings may be allowed and may encroach on the required stream buffer if; a) Bridges, stream simulation culverts, or other :appropriate methods dcm.onstrated to provide fisheries protection shall be used for sbcam cLossing's and the applicant shall demonstrate that such methods and their implementation �aili pose no hat -in to the stream habitat or inhibit migration of fish; b) All crossings are (,onsttlreted during; the summer low flow and are timed to avoid stream clisturbance during periods when use is critical to salmonids, if present; c) Crossings do not occur over spawning areas used by salmonicls unless the City determines that no other possible crossing site exists; d) Bridge piers or abutments are not placed within the ordinary high-water mark; e) Crossings do not dirninish the flood -carrying capacit% of the stream; fj Crossings are consistent with design requirements of the Washington Departrnerit of Fish and Wildlife (WDF,X'. 201:3, V'atet Crossing Desig-n Guidelines, as amcrtded); g). Underground utility crossings are laterally drilled and located at a depth of four feet below the maximum depth of scour for the rase flood predicted by a civil engineer licensed in the state of Washington. Ternporary bore pits to perform such crossings may he pe:rniitt:ed -,vidiirt the stream buffer estibtished in this chapter; h) The number of crossings is minimized and consolidated to serve multiple Purposes anti properties whenever possible; <+.�FiU?4-G6-i'i' 3san:;• Rclso:i'iP;1e t;�e i° Page 5 of 1' •t Due ID 80032 i) Disturbances to the stream buffer are adequately compensated by a stream buffer enhancement t�lan; and j) No reasonable alteruat.ive exists to access the subject property. ;additional outside agency review and permits will be required; please contact WDFW directly for permit requirements, Streams BuCfer tntru�;ion — A request for an intrusion into a stream buffer will be reviewed and decided upon using Process III per 1 WRC 19.145.330. Responses to decisional criteria and desi€m requirements in this section shall be included in the critical areas report. The applicant shall demonstrate that the. remaining and enhanced reduced buffer will function at an equivalent or higher level than the standard buffer. The plan shall provide an assessment of the following existing functions and conditions of the buffer and the effects of the proposed modification on those functions: a) Habitat; b) Water quality; Q Stormwater retention capabilities; d) Groundwater recharge; and e) Erosion protection. The City -ma) approve a streams buffer intrusion based on the following criteria: o a j It will not adversely affrct water quality; b) It will not adversely affect tile existing duality of wildlife habitat within the stream or buffer area; c) It will not adversely aftect.drai:Mtge or stormwaterretention capabilities; d) it will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards; e) It will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area of the subject property nor to the city as a whole; and t) It is necessary for reasonable development of the subject property. Otber requirements — • SiLe lteecmq i� —Site reconnaissance necessary for preparing land use or building permit applications requires Partial Exemption approval per FWR.0 19.145.120(2). Any disturbance of the critical area shall brr :the: rninimum necessary to conduct the site reconnaissance and the area ,shall be restored to its previous condition immediately. A written request must be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to commencing the exploratory work. There is no fee associated vxith the partial exemption request. a Setbacks: Unless otherwise approved, structures shall be set back a distance of five feet from the edges of a critical area buffer. l laxriccr (on Chic: The owner of any property containing critical areas or buffers on which a development proposal is submitted or .uhy property on which mitigation is established as a result of development, except a public right -of --way or the site of a permanent public facility, shall file a notice approved by the City with the Itiing Cauunty recorder's office. Tlhe required contents and form of the notice shall be determined by the City's Director of Cotrununity Development (director). The notice shall inform tine public of the presence of critical areas, buffers, or mitigation sites on the property, and that limitations on actions in or affecting such critical areas or buffers mtty exist. The notice shall nun -with the land. a Sigip *e: Developmesit proposals approved by the City shall require that the boundary between a critical area buffer and contiguous land shall be identified with permanent signs. Permanent signs shall be a City -approved type designed for high durability. Signs must be posted at an interval of one per lot or '_0-I00024-00-PC I!enry Rea ab:e 11>e Page c of 12 '� Doc IC 800.12 every 150 feet, whichever is less, and must be maintained by the property owner or homeowners' ding, number and placement of the signs.may be modified by the association in perperiuty. The wor director based on specific site conditions. • C r'tie l Area Fcnc i ,,.._Permanent fencing shall be required at the outer edge of the critical area buffers to protect the values and function of the wetland (1i1WRC 19.145.180(d)). • ' 'unit, >: !'he City may limit development activities that involve any clearing and grading to specific months of the year and to a maximum number of continuous clays or hours in order to minimize adverse impacts. 6. Tacoma Smelter Plume —The subject property is located in the Tacoma Smelter Plume detect area, containing between 20 to 40 ppm arsenic and lead concentration. Please contact the Department of Ecology regarding the Soil Safety Program (contact Amy Ilargrove at amy.liatgrove cq.,wa.gov, 360-407-6262). 7. Key Development regulations —All site improvements must comply -ith the applicable RNRC development regulations. -the following general regulaticyns apply to this proposal. Zone RS 15.0 Required Yards, 20 ft., 5 ft., 5 ft. (measured from recorded easements) Front, Side, Rear Drivevays 20 ft, max. Vehicles may not be parked in the required side yard. .fief b,y gfShpctun 30 ft. Above Average Building Elevation I'arkg1;g 2 spaces maxirs'ri,q) I -of 500/a Coverage 8, Application Fees — Please contact the Permit Center at 253-835-2607 or permitcenter@cityoffederalway.com for the review fees applicable for your project: PUBLIC WORKS — DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION Kevin Peterson, 253-835-2734, kevin.peterson(aDcityoffederalway.com Land Use Issues — Stormwater Surface water runoff control and water quality treatment will he required per the 2016 Kr'ng County Surfve li"oter Dcsrgu hfarrra!(1CCSWDNI . At the nine of land use submittal, a prelinvnaxy Technical information Report (I'IR), addressing the relevance of the project to the nine core and five special requireAncnts of the KCS%VDM will be required. A Level 1 downstream analysis shall also be provided in the preliminary TIR. 2. If infiltration is proposed, soil logs prepared by a Licensed gcotechnical engineer or septic designer must be provided to verify infiltration suitability. 3. Show the proposed location and dimensions of any floe control B:IN1P's on the preliminary plans. Doc 1D x a?a zo. uionza-oo-rc H-nry Real .,W. Us, Ng. 7 of 12 4. If work is to be done below the ordinary high-water Mark, a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) permit may be required. Information -regarding this permit can be obtained from the Washington Department offish and Wildlife. Right -of -Way Improvements See the "1.'raffic Division comments from Sarady .Long, Sr. Transportation Planning Engineer for traffic related items. 2. All stormwater treatment and detention requirements outlined above may apply to any improvements within the private easements or public right-of-way. Building Permit Issues 1. The building permit materials will be reviewed under the City's single-family residential (S.F.R) permit process. Submittal requirements for SFR permits are available under the City's website for Building Department handouts, or can be picked up at the Permit Center. 2. The Fede,ctl iYlay Public Works Development S'tanebnkv Manual (including standard detail drawings, standard notes, and engineering checklists) is available on the City's website at li tp 1l%►�v,,a.ritVtaff . era]un3r.t-oin inclt:t,:ttipx?uirf-l7l to assist the applicant's engineer in preparing the plans and TIR. 3. When topographic survey information is shown on the plans, the vertical datum block shall include the phrase "DATUM: N.G.V.D.-29" or "DATUM: K.C.A.S.," on allsheets where vertical elevations are called out. 4. Dra,,vings submitted for plan review shall be printed on 24" x 36" or 22" x 34" -paper. Site plans shall be drawn at a scale of 1" = 20', or larger. Architectural scales are not permitted on engineering plans. 5. Provide cut and fill quantities on the clearing and grading plan. 6. Temporary Erosion and Sediment control (TESC) measures, per Appendix D of the 2016 KCS%VDM, must be shown on the engineering plans. 7. The site plan shall shoe the location of any existing and proposed utility extension and/or points of connection. PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC DIVISION Sarady Long, 253-835-2743, sarady.long(i)cityoffecfersthvay.com Transportation Concurrency Analysis (FWRC 19.90) A concurrency permit with application fee of $1,773.00 is required. The Public Forks Traffic Division will perform concurrency analysis to determine if adequate roadway capacity exists during the weekday PM peak period'to acconunodate the proposed development. Transportation Impact Fees (TIF) (FWRC 19.91) Traffic impact fee will be assessed and collected at building permit issuance using the fee schedule then in effect T\NRC 19.100,070 3(c)). The current 2019 traffic impact fee is $4127.00 per lot plus a three percent administrative fee. The actual fee will be assessed and collected from the applicant when the building permit is issued, using the fee schedule then in effect (f7"X1]ZC 19.100.070 3(c)). '20- 100024� iLh PC iErnry Ra=o ::nxbiu li>c 0. rage"k'r:' [2 ` Uoc I S:VJ - 0 Street Frontage Improvements (FWRC 19.135) 1. The applicant/owner would be expected to improve the private road easement to public street standard. At a minimum, the applicant shall construct a 20' all weather surface within the vehicular access easement or tract consistent from the point the subject property obtains access to the vehicular access easement or tract to the nearest intersecting right-of-way. 2. The applicant may make a written request to the Public Works Director to modify, defer, or waive the required street improvements (FWRC 19,135,070). Infonnation about right-of-way modification requests is available through the Public Works Development Services Division. These modification requests have a nonunal review fee currently at $344.00. 3. Tapers and transitions beyond the project frontage may be .required as deemed necessary for safety purposes, taper rate shall be WS^2/60 or as directed by the Public Works Director, 4. Submit an intersection sight distance analysis for the design vehicle used at Hoyt .Road SW and 43r* Avenue Sly% (Private Road) intersection. The analysis shall be conducted in accordance to the latest AASIITO guidelines (3.5 fc object height, 3.5 ft driver's eye height, 14.5 ft back from the edge of the traveled way for passenger vehicles). The analysis must bear the seal of a licensed engineer in the state of Washington. The sight distance triangle shall be depicted on the plan set. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — BUILDING DIVISION Greg Kirk, (253) 835-2621, greg.l:irk(r ,citvoff(,<lerahvay.com 1. Building Codes. The structure will be treated as a new single-fanuly building permit application and must meet all current codes including. I rterha!ia.�nl,l3rif�t; Code (IBC), 2015 Washington State Amendments NVAC 51-50 • feernationul Afeo')aniwd Code (IMC), 2015 Washington State Amendments �KAC 51-52 • Ulniforlia Pliembigg Code (UPC', 2015 Washington State Amendments WAC 51-56 & VIAC 51-57 • L»ternatioral Fire Code (IFC), 2015 Washington State Amend merits, WAC 51 -54 • Irrational Electric Code (NEC), 2014 A:•ceert1riW!y Code (ICC/ANSI A117.1), 2009 • International Risidetslial Code, 2015 Washington State i nlendnlents WAC 51-51 o I1= ttlii�g'nn State Enemy Code, 2015 WAC 51-11 2. Building Criteria. The following applies to the proposed structure: Occupancy Classification: R-3 • Type of Construction: V-B • Floor Area: Unknown at this time • Number of Stories: Unknown at this time • Fire Protection: may require fire sprinkler system. Consult SKFR fire marshal. • Wind/Seismic: Basic wind speed 8585 Mph, Exposure, 25# Snow load, Seismic Zone D-1 ..., ....M e—..id'C I:Cflf}' 3. Building Permit Application Process. A completed building permit application and single-family checklist are required. Some projects may require a third -party review or inspection. The cost to cover these fees is the responsibility of the applicant. Any third -party fee is in addition to regular pernut fees and costs. Please note, Land Use Approval is recommended prior to submitting the Building permit application to avoid delay in project review. If the project has not received Land Use Approval, it may be placed on hold until Land Use review is completed. 4. Review Timing. Federal Way reviews plans on a first in, first out basis; however, there are some small projects with inconsequential review requirements that may be reviewed out of order. 'I1ie first comment letter can be expected within five to seven weeks of submittal date. Re -check of plans will occur one to three ~weeks after re-subinittal. Revised or resubmitted plans shall be provided in the same format, sire, and amount as the originally submitted plans. Revised/resubmitted drawings shall indicate by means of clouding or written response, what changes have been made from the original drawings. Plans for all involved departments will be forwarded from the Community Development Department. The information provided is based on limited plans and information. The comments provided are not intended to be a complete plan review and further comments are possible at time of building permit plan review. LAKEHAVEN WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT Brian Asbury, 253-946-5407, BAr.bury@)akehaven.org lalrehaven.org WATER 1. This property is located within the water service area boundary of the City of Tacoma. SEWER 1. A Sewer Certificate of Availability issued separately by Lakehaven may be required to be submitted with any land use and/or building permit applications (check with land use agency for requirement). Certificate is valid for one. (1) year from date of issuance. If Certificate is needed, allow one-two work days to issue for typical processing. 2020 cost for a Sewer Certificate of Availabiliry is 580.00. 2. A Lakehaven Developer Extension (DE) Agreement will be required to construct new sanitary sewer system facilities necessary for the proposed development, including extend-to-far-edge(s) in accordance with long- standing Lakehaven policy. Adi itional detail and/or design requirements can be obtained froth Lakehaven by completing & submitting a separm application to Lakehaven for either a Developer Pre -Design Meeting Ora Developer Extension Agreement. Lakehaven encotuages owners/developers/applicants to apply for Lakehaven processes separately to Lakehaven, and sufficiently early in the pre-design/planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development. Due to the currently un-planned concept of how this area's sewer system would develop for properties along the west side of Hoyt Road Still, Lakehaven recommends submitting a preliminary - only plan to Lakehaven for review; prior to preparing/submitting formal sewer plans for review. 3. hi lieu of the rctluiroiwnt fora 1 aicshaven Quelol •r FxiewsLon A,g>�. n3wil(, a sewer service connection for the proposed development may be conditionally allowed by Lakehaven. Owners/developers/ appliearts will need to submit a brief written request Metter, email, or fax) separately to Lakehaven for this standards modification. Such service connection would be subject to owner's acquisition of any private sewer/utility '� 20-100024-00-PC kiemy Reeao mbkl i Page 10 of 12 Doc: ID 8C032 easement on adjacent property (if necessary), execution of -a Temporary Service Agreement, and payment of temporary service (earlycomer) charges assessed with the sewer sertrice connection appiicatiot �X%here (or it) fut re, pctmanent Lake -haven sewer system facilities would be located across the ow,uler's property, the owner shall be req;.rired to grant to Lakehaven all necessary easements for the construction and operation/maintenauce of the future Lakehaven faciliries in locations and on form approved by lAkehaven. Lakehaven encourages owners/developers/applicants to apply for I akchaven processes separately to Lakehaven, and sufficiently early it1 the pre desilyxr/plaruung phase to avoid delays in overall project development. 4. A separate Lakehaven Sewer Service Connection Permit is required for each new connection to the sanitary sewer system, in accordance with standards defined in Lakeluaven's current `Fees and Charges Resolution'. .Nlinimum pipe slope for gravity sever service connections is 29/6. 5. If applicable, the asmciatvd DE Agreement must achieve a point of either Substantial Completion or Acceptance, as determined by Lakehaven prior to activatutg any new sewer service connection. 6. Based on the proposal submitted, preliminary estimated Lakehaven sewer service connection fees/Charges/deposits (2020 schedule) will be as foTk)ws. Actual connection charges will be determined upou submittal of service connection application(s) to Lakehaven. Connection charges are .separate from any DE fees/charges/deposits & are due at the time of application for service. Ali Lakehaven fees, charges and deposits are typically reviewed & adjusted (if necessary) annually, and are subject to change without notice. • Sewer Service Connection Pein'lit: $517 20 fee:. • Capital Facilities Chargc(s)-Sewer: $4,297.07 (one Equivalent Residential Units (ERU)). • Fsarlycomer- Charge (if Temporary Service conditions applicable):$517,600.00 • Service A gteement Charge (if Temporary Service [&/or grinder pump service] conditions applicable): $140.00. C:ounq Document Recording lees (if Temporary Senvice [&/or grinder pump service] conditions applicable): S110.00 7. All Lakehaven Development Engineering related application forms, and associated standards information, can be accessed at Lakehaven's Development Engineering web pages {�ttn:lh►>.vvi.l�l:cEi,��cn�nr}� ?�4 I7.e.�c€r, »�,ut- ru yin n r . 8. All comments herein are valid for one (1) year and are based on the proposal(,) submitted and Lakehaver:'s current regulations and policies. Any change to either the development proposal(s) or Lakehaven's regulations and policies may affect the above comments accordingly. SOUTH KING FIRE AND RESCUE Sean Nichols, 253-946-7242, Sean.Nichols@southkingfrte.otg Water Supply: Fire Flow: The required fire flow for this project is 1000 gallons per minute for residence riot exceeding 3600 square feet including garage and covered areas. A Cedykate of fVater/lvai:`ahiliy including a hydyjulic flow model shall be requested from the water district and provided at the time of building permit application. A hydinulir i;o;v model is required for single family residences that exceed 3600 square feet. including garages and covered areas. Dire Hydrants: Existing fire hydrant meets hydrant lovatim requirements. 20-100024-00-PC Hmy P.easar.able V,e i i 0f 12 Doc ID 800.12 It I Emergency Access: Fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all requirements of Fire Access Policy 10.006 lt�xllst�utlticittgfirr rsr Do coryusai(--Qntrr F fPmc V icx `74: Fire Sprinkler System: Access to lot is less than 20 feet wide and an approved turnaround is not provided. Therefore, due to this limited access and no approved turnaround, Eire sprinklers ARE required. CLOSING This letter reflects the information provided at the preapplication rneeting and is intended to assist you in prepnring plans and materials for formal applications. We hope you found the comments useful to your project. We have made every effort to idcntif4 major issues to r linunate surprises during the City's review of the formal application. The completion of the preapplication process in the content of this letter dory not vest any future project application. Comments in this letter are only valid for one year as per FWRC 19.40.010 (4). As you know, this is a preliminary review only and does not take the place of the frill review that -'vih follow submission of a formal application. Comments provided in this letter are based on preapplication materials submitted. Modifications and revisions to the project as presented for this preapplication may influence and modify information regarding development requirements outlined above. In addition to this preapplication letter, please examine the complete FVVRC and other relevant codes carefully. Requirements that are found in the codes ffiat are not addressed in this letter are still required for your project. If you have questions about an individual comment, please contact the appropriate department representative noted above. Any general questions can be directed towards me, the key project contact, Becky Chapin, at 253- 835-2641, he:oky.cluipinGcityoffetle'ral-way.corn. We look forward to working with you. Sil�ccrc>ly. qlctclk�yvfCh. lain Senior Planner enc: Master Land Use Application Process III or IV Submittal Requirements Mailing Labels Handout SEPA Submittal Requirements Calculating Tree Units Clearing and Grading Regulations Coacurrency Information Kevin Peterson, 1<,nginccring Plans Reviexer Sarady Long, Sr. Transportation Planning; r.gincer Greg; Kirk, Plans Examiner Sear, Nichols, South King Fire & Rescue Brian Asbury, lakehaven Water & Sewer District ..2' P-•e 12 of 12 •s ' Doe II)80032 2�-iUUU24-UU-I'C Reasonable1ICnrVti SC h' MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION CIT Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 W wtv.ilyoffederalwa .corn REMOVED- AN03rQ0 APPLICATION NO(S) A-d - / V UD a T — P iiDate . I _ 3 ",90 l q _ Project Name Lo T c Property Address/Location 3 3 3 0 5 4'� rci Ayc S W Parcel Number(i) Project Description PLEASE PRINT 142-lo 3 - CID Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) ,Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information Zoning Designation i111¢d IAA 4Vrehensival&Designation. iU Value of Existing Improvements �2.SD) 00a Value of Proposed Improvements International Building +Code (IBC): I�l.L F[]EM r r L4 Occupancy Type 'Y1/0rd F-rCi mj Construction Type TAI Applicant Name: /G. IG(n ��K Address: 35bo I City/State: yA�(_o�-.r W A Zip: q 8 U :T 45- Phone: 3 (g0 _ Zi5 1. '91 -�115_ Fax: None_ Email: P, YYr b_e . vyyr_vr; re ou-4I c7ck- • (.6m Signature: Agent (if different than AppI Name: 9 A AJLE Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner I�AAAE Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: L� Bulletin #003 —January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application Henry Reasb.table Use Pre -application Conference 20-100024-00-PC Legend 17 Parcels 100 Year Floodplains 17 Wetlands (1998 City Survey) Figure: Environmentally Critical Areas Map Erosion Hazard Area Landslide Hazard Areas Shoreline Designations - King County Shoreline Designations - Federal Way CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 9, 2020 TO: Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager Greg Kirk, Building Plans Examiner Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: William Golding FOR DRC MTG. ON: January 23, 2020- Internal January 30, 10:00 AM - with applicant FILE NUMBER(s): 20-100024-00-PC RELATED FILE NOS.: None PROJECT NAME: HENRY - REASONABLE USE PROJECT ADDRESS: 33305 43RD AVE SW ZONING DISTRICT: RS 15.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed single family residence on a lot encumbered by a creek, wetlands and wetland buffers. LAND USE PERMITS: PROJECT CONTACT: MICHELLE HENRY MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Master Land Use Application Project Narrative Vicinity Map Beaver Creek Envir. Serv., Critical Areas Designation Proposed Site Plan Henry Lot 9043 Pre -Application RECEIVED January 4, 2020 JAN 0 3 2019 CITY OF FED�PAL WAY COS MUNfTY D&V APMENT NARRATIVE SITE DESCRIPTION The existing lot is zoned RS15 and is 36,000 square feet (0.83 AC) in size. The site terrain is generally flat with gentle slopes and divided by a shallow creek through the middle. The creek has an average width of 2- ft across and is small enough to be stepped over in several locations. It flows from south to north and curves through the center of the site. The creek disappears approximately 100 feet to the north where it flattens out and disperses into a wetland area. The site is encumbered with wetlands on the northern portion and covered with natural vegetation both north and west of the creek. There is a large clearing (approx. 9,200 SF) on the southeast portion of the site, bounded by the creek and east property line, where there once was a mobile home. Records indicate the mobile home was placed there in 1990 and addressed 33305 43'd Ave SW. West of the creek in the middle of the site there are remnants of a cabin constructed prior to 1965 that was addressed 4419 SW 333rd Place at the time it was occupied. VICINITY MAP 2 ( King County 2017 Aerial): Note, this does not accurately depict the creek location. Henry Lot 9043 Pre -Application January 4, 2020 BACKGROUND In April of 2019, the County had foreclosed on the project site and two adjacent lots east of the site prior to it owners, Patrick and Michelle Henry. Upon purchase, the Federal Way police assisted in vacating trespassers and inspecting the site for safe access. The site had been a known hotspot for nefarious activities and it carried several code compliance violations for garbage and debris. It contained a dilapidated mobile home, was littered with chopped up vehicles, junk boats, and used needles. The site was covered with over 60 cubic yards of trash and debris. Immediately after purchase, a wetland consultant at Beaver Creek Environmental was hired to advise and prepare preliminary documentation of the critical areas. During the site clean up, over 240 tons of debris and the existing mobile home were hauled off. The site has since been in compliance and the owners have been vigilant in maintaining the vacant lot though obvious trespassing still occurs. The following pictures provide a glimpse into what the site looked like in April before it was cleaned up. To follow is a more recent picture to show what the site looks like today. .x ,-, , . ` 1 1 Henry Lot 9043 Pre -Application January 4, 2020 PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE The proposal is to construct a two story single family home on the existing lot. An exact house plan has not been determined but is anticipated to fit within the building envelope (45' x 55') as shown on attached plan sheets. No portion is proposed to be constructed in the wetland but the entire site is within the wetland and stream buffer areas. The future home will be between 1800 and 2200 square feet in size and have a 2-car garage. This is proposed as reasonable use of the site. SITE ACCESS The site does not have public road frontage. Existing private roads are shown on the attached plan sheets that provide access to the site from public right of way, Hoyt Road. The access from Hoyt Road is 266 feet south along 43`d Ave, a paved private road, to a gravel road that runs approximately 200 feet across a neighboring property to the first parcel owned by the same owners. A new easement is proposed for 25' access easement across the other two parcels owned by the same owners to provide access to the far west lot. There is some confusion with the existing gravel access. A recorded document was found for a 15' wide access easement through the neighboring parcel on the south side of the gravel access road but old plat maps identify the road as 333"d Place fully on the opposite parcel along the north side of the road. UTILITIES The proposal is for a connection to the Lakehaven Utility District for sanitary sewer and Tacoma Water District for public water. • Water — An existing water service extends to the site from a meter box in Hoyt Road. ■ Sewer — The nearest public sewer is a gravity 10-inch sewer main and manhole adjacent to the backside of the property with an easement to the north property line near the southwest corner of the site. The proposal is for a sewer connection to the existing sewer manhole with a force main for the use of private grinder pumps on each of the three lots under same ownership. A gravity sewer is feasible but not likely desirable by the utility to be extended through a naturally vegetated area where maintenance access could be challenging, along with a potential for inflow and infiltration. For these reasons a pressure sewer system seems to make more sense. Henry Lot 9043 Pre -Application Power is overhead and existing to the site. January 4, 2020 Drainage — Soils in the southern half of the site are well drained and will likely allow for infiltration if permitted. As described in the attached critical areas report by Beavercreek Environmental the soils in that area `consist ofAlderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam(AgQ. The soil parent material is basalt till with some volcanic ash and is well drained.' CRITICAL AREAS The boundaries of the critical areas onsite have been determined by a preliminary report from Beavercreek Environmental and are shown on the attached plans sheets and in the attached Critical Areas Report. The wetland to the north of the site is shown on the plan sheet is shown in an approximate location based on the previous wetland delineation for the Dash Pointe Subdivision. Attachments: Critical Areas Report 2019 Survey Drawing 1 — Critical Areas Drawing 2 — Proposed Utilities •f'• f 1• -�-'�} �x �5W31�h�� - 5w3 �r kk �� µ�-NI r. �++'rr or 1p�,r r�.... ,�:• pis. ` - rR take - t 3 I. i tII -� C fLN SW 320[li1St , 320th St 1p Beaver Creek Environmental Services, Inc. RECEIVED May 18, 2019 JAN 0 3 2019 Ms. Michelle Henry, PE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY P & M Development LLC COMMUN TY DEVELOPMENT 35001 NE 147TH AVE Yacolt, WA 98675 p. m.d evelopment(a-)-autloo k.com 360-281-8195 RE: Critical Areas Designation (CAD) Parcels # 142103-9069, 9087, and 9043 33305 43rd Ave. SW and adjacent east, City of Federal Way, Washington Ms. Henry, As requested, we have evaluated Parcels 142103-9069, -9087, and -9043 project site for jurisdictional wetlands, streams, and required buffers. The CAD wetland delineation encompassed the entire site, and offsite to 315 ft. of the periphery of the parcel, as visible. SW ,Ilu, PI 9W 1]n11i 51 N 9 i3i sW ,IOM % � 1� aW]!p' 9W 1>nln Pl n 4 wSl9M al _ 9 . 9 %SW ]]0,1`5, 9NI,19tl1 [I sW n9m PI :.le W SW„1\1 PI HE NE SW „]nJ i• NE z '! ,91 .1 Sy r.sl JIB sw ley' � PLO SW „PM s1 a i RW ,n Yl NE' ge NS n ro �$4 JJlIA 9� !W �1111 JI NE hfi SW ,lsM S, b t SW J"" PI KIh sl NE RE a olhsl NE Y 9W ,l9hL Sources: Esri, ^ JW„W" a HERE, 41h SI NE NM s, L, NE- Garmin; Figm-e i. Pro'iccl Location & Ficinily mop ----- POB 731695 • Puyallup WA 98373 ----- (253) 732-6515 MHeekert@Q.com Location and Existing Conditions The property is located to the west and north of SW 333Id Place, in the City of Federal Way. This project site is irregular, 73,945 sq. ft. [1.7 acre] total. The site is vacant of development. The site apparently formally contained a mobile home, and contained huge quantities of trash. The site has apparently been a dump for many years. The current owners have removed six ire2. Exicrinr. Cowliii,, Methodology The site visit was conducted on April 12, 2019. A combination of field indicators, including: soils, vegetation, and hydrology, were used to determine whether wetlands were present. Onsite assessment followed the established criteria and methods as defined within the Corps of Engineers (CoE) Wetland Delineation Manual - 2010 Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast (INMVC) Regional Supplement, Revised Washington State Wetland Rating System (WSWRS), and City of Federal Way Code 19.145 Environmentally Critical Areas. Wetlands are transitional areas between aquatic and upland habitats. In general terms, wetlands are lands where the extent and duration of saturation with water is the primary factor determining the nature of soil development and the types of plant and animal communities living in the soil and on its surface (FGDC, 2013). Wetlands are generally defined as "those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and 2 Henry Fed Way CAD Report duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." (Federal Way Code 15.05.030). Wetlands exhibit three (3) essential characteristics, all of which must be present for an area to meet the established criteria within the Wash. Manual and the CoE Manual. These essential characteristics are: Hydrophytic Vegetation: Meaning a predominance of plants that are typically adapted for life in saturated soils, Hydric Soil: Meaning soil's that are saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper horizons, and Wetland Hydrology: Meaning permanent or periodic inundation, or soil saturation to the surface, at least seasonally. Streams are delineated by identification of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). The definition of the OHWM as defined by the Washington State Department of Ecology as a part of the Shoreline Management Act is: "the mark on all lakes, streams, and tidal water that will be found by examining the bed and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971, as it may naturally change thereafter, or as it may change thereafter in accordance with permits issued by a local government or the department: Provided, That in any area where the ordinary high water mark cannot be found, the ordinary high water mark adjoining salt water shall be the line of mean higher high tide and the ordinary high water mark adjoining fresh water shall be the line of mean high water". 3 Henry Red Way CAD Report Existing Documentatfon National Wetland Inventory (NWI) resources (fig. 3) identify no wetlands on the project site. A linear R4SBC (Riverine Intermittent Streambed Seasonally Flooded) is described flowing generally within the project site. /II ure 1. NW1017al Welland /nrenlay AAap 4 Henry Fed Way CAD Report Federal Way Critical Area data (fig. 4) identifies a large wetland complex through the west and north of the project site, designated 14-21-3-4. This wetland has not been previously cnaracterizea py the ui 4 I • 14-21-3-'327• ' i � 14-21-3-58 � 1, �' � j•_ • f,%.•' ;1 S roes: Esrt, �.. H�RE. � • j i. ti Garmin,. �. `7.m�ermap, J. Federal 6Vcry 4Vellands & Aquatic Arens Map 3 ti 5 Henry Fed Way CAD Report The NRCS soils map (fig. 5) identify soils on the site as: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam — not listed as hydric. hi,�urc ). NRC'S Sniis nm/) Field Observations Upland Areas The project site contains one primary upland habitat area and one wetland -stream complex. Vegetation: The entire site is unmanaged forest. Major plant species include Bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) alder (Alnus rubra), Douglas -fir (Pseudotsuga menziesil) and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus). In the north and west portions of the site, Black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) predominates, with salmonberry understory. Soils: The soils in the south of the project area consist of Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC). This soil parent material is basalt till with some volcanic ash and is well drained. Soil plot data for the pasture areas was 0-12 in. 10YR3/6 and 12-16 in. 10YR4/2 with no hydric soil indicators. In the north 10YR 2/1 silty loam occurs throughout. 6 Henry Fed Way CAD Report Hydrology: Surface flow through the site is generally directed by topography from the south to north. A stream located at the south boundary of the site supplies flow throughout the north portion. Long-term ponding in depressions throughout the area is evident. Wetlands Two wetlands were identified on the site. One wetland was determined to be present at the south boundary of the site, on the south bank of the stream. This wetland is a Cat. III Wetland with a 165-ft. buffer. In the north, adjacent north of the stream, a large wetland complex occurs. This wetland is designated 14-21-3-4, and is identified as a Cat. II wetland, requiring a 165-ft. buffer. The buffer boundary for this wetland encompasses the entire upland portion of the site. (Attachment 1). Aquatic Areas The ditch which flows along the west boundary has been determined by King County to be a Type F Aquatic Area. Type F Aquatic Areas mandate a 165-ft. buffer, as parallel to the ordinary high water mark. Off Site No other critical areas were identified off -site of the project area. Proposed Site ❑evelopment The development proposed is a single-family house in each of the three parcels. Due to the wetland and stream buffers encompassing the entire site, a variance will be required to permit the houses on the site. If you have questions or need additional information please contact me at 253.732.6515 or by email at MHeckert@Q.com. Respectfully Submitted, Mark Heckert, President 7 Henry Fed Way CAD Report ti lbo by ti Zb5 e LO N N w 0- 0 J U) Y Z Q 00 2 H D O Z Q J H W Z N cM C. >,(n �rn2 Zw �� c N Z M E cco w o c 2 � Q: L - o •N E � z 0 CO f° m rnQ w o 0 cn � � O U J m cc z o ii v N N 0 uC) L U c LO M 0 (6 c N E c 0 L > E c o W U YdLOCO (�io U t: CO N N N > U O cc a)= L N mN� 0 HENRY OT --9-043-(3,3 05 43-RU AVE � W� _ CRITIC -IA�S^ - - _ - - - - = =StALE � FEET — — — — — 10 — — )ALEI 039086�'Y 7��Tn�R-1 li'iC�1J 1 J� to C�ROBER _ _ -_- --_----_-_-del r-e-ate..d=i-n-.lea-s4-Toin -r = -- , ^q�� T 1421039065 STIERS, w ROBERT - - - STFF•M .--------7 -HENR -7,- PAT & _ ry _ - _ - -IvfICHELZE ' f 2- To 1'- i 1421039047 S BLUE SKY, LLC 30425 _ - - _ - �q�G ��� - v - 1421039069 � -�7 - HENRY, PAT MICHELLE ¢ - - STREAM 'C'a PAVED PRIVATE RD i - yam MIN 1 FT Bt1FFEf2- STR AM7.wMkN© +S i RM 250 1 PROPOSED 25' f ��L f 1421039048 8 S BLUE SKY, LLC I 0 B 53NGRESS/EGRESS UTILITY o - -� - ACCESS EASEMENT TREAM- - M. EXTG GRAVEL D/W '� ' m �a EXTG w 95-a' f r �100.4' r _!{,�~ J 200.0' — — — — — —.r 265 �o �� WE AND BNDRY Proposed �i� 9 SFR- 270 + Q cr`��a D 23' 1 . 45'W x 55'D 5 \ 1421039061 WL ENDS NEAREST MALL, SHIRLEY, ROADWAY EASEMENT--'25 ' fi 1421039043 HENRY, PAT & POINT i i `v 1 PER Af hl 5255.5[7i� MICHELLE 36,015 SF �p - S 1S 2 :. ' 11 �Q` aQ�' EAST tl�is= THE 51+ � (0,83AC) CONFL STREA W �@� T EArN 54 , PER QUARTER CECMN 1 i �� �=f�! 5.17?2i1a .�RIVI �� 251.75' �q �A cc iv. p�� D SOUTH BANK SLOPE v54 1 1�� LEA, TRACY { 'AYRA, LYNDA CEIVE® IA 0 3 2019 1 CITY OF EDERAL WAY �irl��Je+�1T DEVELOPMENT A - HENRYL-0_T_* 04-3 - -14k03ROBERT TfE �33 --SCALE- IN •FS` Z�T - - TAMLLY RESIDENCE- _ - _ - _ _ - ° - -50 . ,100 a :- _ - -- r 1421039065 - �CALI --I :50 - - _ - - - f - - - - - - - -. 7 . �D�- - � STIERS, ROBERT r-.._..-7 -HENRY PAT & _ - - - VICHELTE ' I 1421039047 - - - _ - - - S BLUE SKY, LLC - 74y 51 - � - r _ " - - .. .f � 1421039069 t _ _ _ HENRY, PAT & `* 4421'039643. _ MICHELLE . I � > I N m z HENRY, 2AT. r - - - - - - ,d •:� 245 i PAVED PRIVATE RD I w -36, 01-T SF' - 1 - - FUTURE 25' < EXISTING 1 z' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT FEXTG 10" SAN SEWER 25' INGREiSrCEGRESS. - UTILITY A�GES.S E-SMT REAM - �+ BNDRY 1 ' SAN SEWER ESMT IN_:10' f PROPOSED SANITARY `. SEWER FORCE MAIN 1' A\ -3501=F 79 M-DPE---� / FM � -1-1 ' t 251.75' o 1421039054 I LEE, JANC & TRACY +� ]. 1421039060 111 MYRA, LYiNDA SFR Bldg Envelope 45V x 55'D INGRESS/EGRESS & 1421.039048 m UTILITY ACCESS ESMT 250 S BLUE SKY, LLC I FUTURE SAN FM; 195' 2"HDPE- EX GRAVEL D/W Ln ' 95.00T — 100.00' N 200'� EXTG 1" WATER EX GRAVEL SERVICE TO LOT - ¢- --- -- - -- ! - - BRA - GRAVEL INFILTRATION 1 9061 TRENCH (D/W) 1 HALLLL,, SHIRLEYSIRL25' I 5 SETBACK STREAM CROS ING 60LF GRAVEL I EXTG WA 1 INFILTRATION TRENCH �. _-.°�'�E�IT PER METER B (ROOF RUN-OFF) �Fcd 54772�5 N z LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS P.,==mM ` "421039054 LEE, JANG & TRhC�' 1 i .J BASIS OF BEARING 1=21039060 IIYR4. LYND4 NAD 83/11 WASHINGTON NORTH ZONE ESTABLISHED USING GPS RTK ROVER CONTRAINED TO THE WASHINGTON STATE REFERENCE NETWORK (WSRN) AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF 20— AT A., IN BOOK_ OF AT AT THE REQUEST OF THOMAS E BATTEY. UN7Y AU 1 LEGEND ® CALCULATED MONUMENT POSITION o FOUND REBAR AS NOTED • SET 1/2" REBAR & CAP, BATTEY 30425 a n.,hFeT 142103,365 STIERS, ROBERT 14210399L7 S BLUE SKr. =C 1 7:210350 6 T S BLUE SKY, PLC I 1,fETHOD OF SURVEY AND FIELD EOUIPIvENT UTILIZED: CONVENTIONAL FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS (UTILIZING A TRIMBLE S5 OR 55 TOTAL STATION) AND GPS RTK ROVER AgTVWMGY TFIIS SURVEY COMPLIES WITH ALL STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES DE 7HE "SURVEY RECORDING AC7- CHAP7ER 58.09 RCW AND 332-130 WAC SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF THOMAS E BATTEY IN AUGUST, 2019. THOMAS A Y, .L. DATE CERTIFICATE NO. 30425 PARCEL'A' APN: 1421039043 (PER FIDELITY NATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE NO. 611137380TX, DATED JULY 27, 2016) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M.; IN TONG COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE PUYALLUP 1NDIAN RESERVATION WHICH POINT IS SOUTH 4514742' EAST 651.03 FEET FROM THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT, SAID POINT TO BE CALLED POINT 'A' FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES; THENCE NORTN 40'37'07' ALSO FAST 292.32 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT MNGTHE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT CONVEYED TO LARRY MANSUR AND DARLENE M. MANSUR, HIS WIFE BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING N0. 5266574, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE MANSUR TRACT; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID MANSUR TRACT TO THE WEST LINE OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT CONVEYED TO MILES HALL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5477205 HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE HALL TRACT; THENCE NORTH 003731" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID HALL TRACT AND THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION THEREOF TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 40137'07' EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT CONVEYED TO ORA PAUL BROWN BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7206230368; THENCE SOUTH 40°37107" WEST TO THE TRUE POINT OF 8EGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF IGNG, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL'B' APN: 1421039087 (PER FIDELITY NATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE NO. 611137382TX, DATED JULY 27, 2016) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M.; IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 2; = THENCE NORTH 0"3731" WEST 785.1 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'12'18" WEST 300 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89"12'18" WEST 95 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0"3731" WESTTO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A TRACT CONVEYED TO HENRY R. SPEDDEN BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 6444915; THENCE NORTH 40'37'07' EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 013731" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0"3731" EAST OF THE TRUE PONT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 'C' APN: 1421039069 (PER FIDELITY NATION TIME INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE NO. 611137381TX, DATED JULY 27, 2016) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M.; IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATTHE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT; THENCE NORTH 0'3731" WEST, 785.1 FEET, - _ THENCE SOUTH 89°12'18" WEST, 200 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89"12'18" WEST, 100 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0'3731" WEST, 200 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°12'18" EAST, 80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0*37341 EAST, 100 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89"12'18" EAST, 20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0'3731" EAST, 100 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTANY PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHWESTERLY OF A LINE BEGINNING ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 2 AT A POINT SOUTH 45°47'42" EAST, 651.03 FEET FROM THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT; AND RUNNINGTHENCE NORTH 40°37V7" EAST, 11SO.91 FEETTO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT, DISTANT NORTH 89'40'45" EAST, 122S.47 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. INDEX: IN THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4, SEC 14, TWP 21 N. RGE 3 E. W.M. LARSON RECORD OF SURVEY AND ASSOCIATES FOR ® LAND SURVEYORS PATRICK & MICHELLE HENRY ENGINEERS PLANNERS DRAWN BY: MTP DAIS 6/27/2019 JOB NQ 9234 )u27 PACIFIC AVENUE SUITE 4 TACOIIA. WASHINGTON 9844J<217 CHECKED BY: TEE SCALE: 1" = 60' SHEET (253)474-3404/ FAX(2i3)472-7358 1 OF 1 cirY or Pre -application Conference Sign in Sheet Federal 'may COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE January 30, 2020 City Hall 10:00 a.m. Hylebos Room 1. 2. 3. 4. 9. 1 C�G� lZ `4�(.lrt ✓c 10. 11. , JGf_r-_ 12. Project Name: Henry Reasonable Use Address: 33305 43'd Ave SW File Number: 20-100024-00-PC DEPARTMENT / DIVISION CAV PtAan -I. n TAJ / itxv a, v Ic'es P f„ I `-ev . Q „-� 'g- s k- Uq r,-Z. ,(` -- cc) �S_Ak -rr-& 0 5 / & ��- 14, TELEPHONE NuMBER/EMAIL 253-le3s-2��/ a53- 835460 f;�y ttxy.co� .253 B 3S- Zt'7 3 41 2.,33^ T3 S'- —L}?, q a63 S3! - _'2\ e.j rft FILE CITY OF Federal Way Centered on Opportunity January 14, 2020 Michelle Henry 35001 NE 14711, Avenue Yacolt, WA 98675 p. m. development@ outlook. com CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederal way. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor RE: File #20-100024-00-PC; PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED Henry — Reasonable Use, 33305 43,d Avenue SW, Parcel # 142103-9043, Federal Way Dear Ms. Henry: The Community Development Department is in receipt of your January 3rd, 2020 preapplication conference request. The application has been routed to members of the Development Review Committee (DRC) and a meeting with you has been scheduled as follows: 10:00 a.m. — Thursday, January 30, 2020 Hylebos Conference Room Federal Way City Hall, 2,,d Floor 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way, 'Y1A 98003 We look forward to meeting with you. Please coordinate directly with anyone else you would like to attend the meeting as this will be the only notice sent by the department. If you have any questions regarding the meeting, please contact me at williain.golding@cityoffederalway.com, or 253-835-2622. Sincerely, w William Golding Planning Intern Doc 1 D 90022