Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
18-102925
;,FF'/. I IALL CITY OF 8?Avenue 6Federa.V,VA 9883-325Ak Fedel G1 ay (253) 85 7000 -rvn.cr<yct%edere;:F,%ay :oar 0 i;z Mra rH,-V Ji, r • Ferre?l. !days, December 11, 2018 �O 0 1> Lot D�,a�, 9 0 Mi s. Dawn Markakis C.E.S. NIX/ Inc. 310 29t11 Street NE, Suite 101 Puyallup, WA 98372 cl77la rkl €e1S,'_ri;CL:R17�Lry71 Re: File #18-102925-SU; BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT APPROVAL Sokalshyy BLA, XXXX South 35911, Street, Parcels 292104-9060 & -9091, Federal Way Dear Ms. Markakis: The City of Federal Way has completed an admirastxative rcview of the above -referenced Boundwry Line Adjustment (BLA) applicaiion received July 3, 201 S. The Department of Community Development hereby Conditionally approves the turn -page survey drawing entitled "Boundary Line Adjustment for Pavlo Sokalskyy,"' prepared by C.E.S. NAY/ Inc., signed by Seth D. O'Iiare, PLS: date stamped received November 9, 2018. C.E.S. NW Inc., resubnutted on drawing revisions and materials on August 1, 2018, and November 9, 2018. BACKGROUND The applicant propnses to alter the interior lot lines between two lots in the RS 15:0 Single -Family Residential zone to establish buildable area. No buildings exist on the subject property; ho:vever, the site appears to be used for horses or livestock as wire fencing surrounds the site perimeter. The subject property contains wetlands, and associated werland buffers of an onsite Category II wetland with a 165-foot buffer and an off -site Category I wetland with a 225-foot buffer. The Category I wetland is associated with the West Fork of the Hylebos Creek to the west and north of the subject property. Both parcels are complete encumbered by the Category I and II wetland buffers. DECISIONAL CRITERIA City staff has determined the BLA meets decisional criteria set forth in Federal Way _R6ph-ed Code (FWRC) Chapter 18.10: The BLA is a minor alteration in the location of lot boundaries on existing lots. The BLA will not increase the number of lots, nor diminish the size of open space or ether protected environments. A critical areas report vas submitted, "Wedand Reporr for parcel number 2921049090 and 2921049091" by Habitat Technologies aunc 13, 2010). The report wsrs peer reviewed And documented in January 31, 2017, and Septetnbex 5, 2017, memos by the city's consultant, Ouik. The corrected wetland delineations, ratings, and buffers have been reviewed and are shown on the BLA drawing. 101 ibis. Niarkakis Page 2 of 3 December 11, 2018 2, 1'.be BLJ, will not diminish the: size of any, lot so as to result in a lot of less square footage than, prescribed in the RS 15.0 zoning district. 3. The BLA will not result in the reduction of setbacks or site coverage to less than prescribed in the RS 15.0 zoning district. In addition, the BLA will not result hi the creation of undevelopable lots nor lots that are more restrictive in terms of budldable area, than the original property line configuration. 4. All lots resulting from the BL.1 will be in conformance with the deslsri standards of the city's subdivision tittle. RECORDING Pursuant to FNVRC 18.10.060, all boundary line adjustments shall be .recorded with the King County Division o C Electicxns and Records. One signed raylar or paper original BLA shall now be submitted to the city for appropriate cite signatur" We will provide you the original BLA snap for recording whcil it is signed by the Nbiic Works and Community Development Directors. Please allow for 24-72 hours for official city signatures. The appiieant will record the BLA. Please return one conformed recorded copy original to the C::otnni union Development Department immediately after recording. NO cltaFages to the BLA &cumcnt arc allowed fdailo,,ving city signature. If the county regarding process necessitates revisions to the BLA reap, you must request ,md receive approval of tiny changes fiom city staff prior to recording. Plm'e note: Blue unit is not acceptable on documents and maps which will be recorded; all signatures and writing must be made with permanent black ink. APPRONIAL CONDITIONS Staff recommends the Director of Community Development include the following conditions of approval in the boundary line adjustment decision. I. All future building and land use permits trust comply -with F% RC 19.:145.15t)(41; 19.145.160> Mad 19.14.5,420 as they relate to wetlands, associated 'buffers, criucal area sigmage, and fencing. 2. Prior to recording add a note regarding the access/utility- casement recording number under. "S acial ttentfons and RestridionP and the easement location on the plans. 3. Prior to final recording, depict the Category II 165-foot wetland buffer location on the plans. 4. Prior to final recording, the BLA drawings shah he modified pursuant to the enclosed city redlines depicted on the preliminary BLA drawing stainped "approved December 10, 2018." 5. Submit a copy of the recorded access easement to rite attention of Senior I.�,ngiaieering Plans Examiner Kevin Peterson. 33- ?212 -;)b SU Ms. Markakis Page 3 of 3 December 11, 2018 CLOSING The BLA is approved with conditions based on the decisional criteria above. This land use decision does not ,&aive compliance with picture City of Federn) Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this develapmeat. if you have any questions regarding Lim decision, please contact Associate planncx Leila VUilloughby-❑akcs at ?53-535-264,1, t)r ledawilloughby-unkesCq)cityoffmier ilway.com- S.incerelp, l3rii�it Davis Director of Community Development enc.: I KC Recording Handout Resubmitt,,d Form Preliminary BLA Map by C.E.S. NW, stamped approved 12-I0-18 Willoughby -Oakes ;Associate Planner Kevin Peterson, Senior E'sngineeringPk,!is Reviewer Chris Caban, South King fire & Rescue }arias Asbury, IA-chaven Watcr & Srwu l]i:strict (:riig I)tnaCr, (:jI,.S. !VW, r + A'- t� n«iur.r�n=i krh 0,k1 m PUS, C:.U...S i�lVf`, ��h �,: �i rv?n ►j_m'- p tkw T.i), ?s 1'..•1 �s� iv�925-ri, S 1�kCITY OF Federal Way Centered on Opportunity August 6, 2018 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Dawn Markakis Email: darkakis _ cesnwinc.com C.E.S. NW Inc. 310 29d' Street NE, Suite 101 Puyallup, WA 98372 RE: File #18-102925-00-SU; LETTER OF COMPLETENESS/ TECHNICAL COMMENTS #2 Sokalskyy BLA (S. 359`h Street), Parcel #'s 292104-9060 & -9091, Federal Way Dear Ms. Markakis: The City of Federal Way's Community Development Department is in receipt of your July 3, 2018, Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) application for the above -mentioned parcels. The application was deemed incomplete on July 26, 2018. On July 31, 2018, you resubmitted materials. The BLA will result in a rotation of the lots away from S. 359`h Street, to be served by a shared easement. The applicant received city approval of a revised wetland delineation report prepared by Habitat Technologies (revised May 10, 2017) on September 18, 2017. Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) I9.145.410(1) wetland delineations are valid for five years; after such date, the city shall determine whether a revision or additional assessment is necessary. There are off -site Category I wetlands within 225 ft. of the subject properties (i.e. Spring Valley Open Space). Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 18.10.040, within 28 days of receiving a BLA application the city shall determine whether all information and documentation required for a complete application has been submitted. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Please consider this correspondence as a Notice of Complete Application. The application is deemed complete as of August 6, 2018, based on a review of your submittal relative to those requirements as set out in FWRC 18.10.030. The submittal requirements are not intended to determine if an application conforms to the City of Federal Way codes; they are used only to determine if all required materials have been submitted. PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL COMMENTS CD Planning, Leila Willoughby -Oakes, 253-835-2644, leila willoughb -Oakes(rr�,citvoffedei•alway.cosn Add application file no. 18-102925-00-SU to title blocks. 2. Please find BLA redlines enclosed. 3. Please add BLA map notes stating the date of the wetland delineation, author, and city approval date. 4. Please depict/label offsite wetlands pursuant to FWRC 19.145.410. The Spring Valley Open Space wetland complex is a high category wetland and valued community asset; off -site wetlands which Ms. Markakis August 6, 2018 Page 2 of 3 have their buffers on the subject property shall be depicted. There are two separate wetlands on/within 225 feet of the properties. a. Identify and characterize all wetlands and buffers on and within 225 feet of the subject property. For off -site areas with limited or no access, estimate conditions using best available information. Please note the off -site wetland areas are owned by the city and you have permission to access these areas in order to conduct an accurate reconnaissance. Please add the following notes to the BLA: All future development actions are subject to FWRC 19.145.160 `Building Setbacks', and FWRC 19.145.180 `Critical Area Markers, Signs and Fences.' 6. Add easement and recording numbers from the title report, in particular the boundary line agreement (label) as "Special Exceptions and Restrictions' on the BLA drawing. 7. You must record a shared access easement over resulting Parcel B. Please see Kevin Peterson's comments below. The city shall review and approve easement language prior to recording per FWRC 19. Note the total easement area. Resulting Parcels A and B should show the `net' area, versus gross area. Vehicular access areas cannot be counted towards total lot area requirements. The subject property is zoned RS 15.0; the lots must maintain a minimum lot size of 15,000 square feet.' PW Development Services, Kevin Peterson, 253-835-2734, Kevin.Peterson ,cityaffederalway.com Add the City file number in the space provided on the title block. 10. Vertical datum shall be per City standard: NGVD-29. 11. There are a couple of easements identified in the Title Report. These easements shall be shown on the BLA drawings, OR, if there isn't sufficient information to show the easement, then it shall be noted on the drawings, and identified as `non -locatable'. 12. The new north lot will need to have an access easement across the south lot. 13. There's an existing gravel driveway on the west side of existing parcel 292104-9091 that appears to be in use by the neighboring parcel to the east. If there's an existing easement for this driveway, please identify it on the drawing. If no easement exists and the driveway is to remain, an easement will need to be recorded and shown on the BLA drawings. The applicant should be aware that any easement could affect the `buildable' area of the lot. 14. The City has minimum easement/driveway width requirements for shared access driveways, which depend on the number of properties using the access. City standard details 3-2CC and 3-2DD show the required minimums for shared access driveways. City standard details can be found at hn-.//docs.ciiyoffedera]way.com/WF-BLINK/Browse.aspx?startid=748626. ' Pursuant to FWRC 19.05.120 `L definitions', lot area means the minimum lot area per dwelling unit based on the underlying zone. For single-family lots, the area of a vehicular access easement, private tract, flagpole, or access panhandle shall not be credited in calculation of minimum lot area. 18-102925-00-SU Doc. I.D. 78124 Ms. Markakis August 6, 2018 Page 3 of 3 South King Fire & Rescue, Chris Cahan, 253-946-7243, Chris.Cahan@southkingfire.org Water Supply A Certificate of Water Availability shall be requested from the water district and provided at the time of building permit application. Fire Hydrants Existing fire hydrant meets requirements for hydrant location. Fire Sprinklers Determination of requirements for residential fire sprinklers, if any, are made at the time of building permit application. CLOSING Formal processing and review of your BLA application will now begin. A full set of technical review comments from PW Traffic and Lakehaven Water and Sewer District will follow under separate cover. Please wait until you receive all comments and resubmit a complete project revision package, in order for the city to streamline reviews. A 120-day time line for reviewing the BLA application has started as of this date. The city's development regulations allow the department 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. However, the 120-day time line can be stopped any time the city requests corrections and/or additional information. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your application, please feel free to contact me at lei la.wiIloughby-oakes Pci . offederalway,com or 253-835-2644. Sincerely, Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Form BLA Map Redlines FWRC 19.135.090 `Vehicular Access Easement Improvements' FWRC 19.135.120 `Recording required' c: Pavlo & Viktoriya Sokalskyy, email: Wawusinc(@vahoo.com (Owner) Brian Asbury, Lakehaven, emailed Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue, emailed Kevin Peterson, Development Services Sarady Long, Traffic Division 18- 1 02925-00-SU Doc. I D. 78124 12/5/2018 Landmark Web Official Records Search ?Pow &Iwof . t Ynstrument Number: 20180919000678 DocumentlAS Rec: $104. 0 Page l Record Date:9/19/2018 2:30 PM King County, WA After Recording Mail to: Bryce H. Dille of Campbell, Dille, Barnett & Smith Attorneys at Law 317 S. Meridian, P.O. Box 488 Puyallup WA 98371 2018091900 678 SEMENT Rea: $104.00 . 9 KING COUNTY, WA Grantor: Pavlo Sokalskyy and Viktoriya Sok _ _ husband and wife Grantee: Pavlo Sokalskyy and Viktoriya Sokalska husband and wife Reference Numbers of Documents Assigned or Released: Abbreviated Legal Description: Ptn of SE % of NE 'f of Sec. 29, Twnshp 21 N, R 4 E of the W.M., King County Complete legal is on Page 4 of document Assessor's Tax Parcel No.: 292104906006, 292104909109 EASEMENT THE UNDERSIGNED, Pavlo Sokalskyy and Viktoriya Sokalska, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Sokalsk)y") do hereby execute this Grant of Easement according to the following terms and conditions set forth herein. RECITALS 1. Sokalskyy are the owners of certain real property situated in the city of Federal Way, King County, Washington, the legal descriptions of which are attached hereto and marked as Exhibit A. 2. Sokalskyy are doing a boundary line adjustment with respect to said properties under City of Federal Way BLA No. 18-102925-00-SU. A copy of the proposed BLA is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 3. In connection with any consideration of doing the boundary line adjustment, it is necessary that an easement be granted with respect to ingress, egress and utilities over and across Easement Page 1 of 3 EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED ion Records Division By Deputy https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriterialnstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 1/6 12/5/2018 Landmark Web Official Reco ds 514h ! �. wu' lk a 1 yyl ltnb-: ���3Q9190(��674ocumert:#�S„�; $14rD0 Page-2 � veecord Date: `719/2018 230 PM Kin fount WA g Y the East 25 feet of Parcel B of the above referenced boundary line adjustment for the benefit of Parcel A of the boundary line adjustment, NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the parties do hereby state as follows: 1. Grant of Easement. Sokalskyy do hereby grant, subject to the terms and conditions herein, a non-exclusive perpetual easement for purposes of the construction and maintenance of utilities as well as for access -and the construction of any improvements in connection therewith, over ana -across the property described as the :Access and Utility Easement which is attached hereto ;tid marked as Exhibit C. 2. Makes oHmpmements. The benefited parcel with respect to this easement is Parcel A of the City of Federal Way boundary line adjustment 18-102925-00-SU, and therefore the owners of that property will be solely responsible for the repair and maintenance of the utilities and any access improvements installed or constructed on the above described access and utilities easement. Furthermore the owners of said Parcel A and their successors in interest do hereby agree to indemnify and hold the owners of Parcel B of the above referenced boundary line adjustment harmless and indemnify them from any claims, loss, suits or actions which may be instituted against them arising out of or in connection with the use and maintenance of the above described easement. 3. Attorney's Fees. In the event that it is necessary to institute any legal action to enforce any of the terms and provisions herein, the prevailing party in such legal action shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorney's fees and costs of suit. 4. Binding Effect. This grant of easement and the terms and conditions contained herein shall be binding not only on the parties hereto, but their heirs, successors and assigns, and said grant of easement shall run with the land. 5. Entire Agreement. This grant of easement constitutes the entire agreement with respect to the subject matter herein, and cannot be'modified or amended, except in writing, signed by all affected parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this easement and agreement on the 10 day of 9 - 12018. Pavlo Sokalskyy Viktoriya Sokalska Easement Page 2 of 3 https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriterialnstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 2/6 12/5/2018 Landmark Web Cfficia[ Records Search Instrument Number: 2, _80919000678 Document:�AS Rec: $104.00 Page-? Record Date:9/19/2018 2:30 PM Ding County, WA STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF PIERCE ) On this day personally appeared before me Pavlo Sokalskyy and Viktoriya Sokalska, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for -the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of , 2018. MARY LAFRANCHI Printed arr �°" 'NOTARY PUBLIC in40, for the State of NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON ashington, residing at commission expires: My Commission Expires September 9, 2020 Easement Page 3 of 3 https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriterialnstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 3/6 12/5/2018 Landmark Web Official Records Search Instrument Number: 2�.180919000678 Document:'L--iS Rec: $104.00 Page-4 Record Date:9/19/2018 2:30 PM Ding County, WA EXHIBIT A The land In the County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT NORTH 0001415" WEST 391.15 FEET FROM THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 28 AND 29 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 89035'15" WEST 1044.5 FEET, ALONG THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF THE NEIL COUNTY ROAD (SOUTH 359TH STREET), AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2616092, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00°1415" WEST 283.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89035'15" WEST TO THE WEST LIME OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUB01VISION TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID NEIL ROAD; i HENCE SOUTH 89135°15' EA 1 ALONG THE NORTHHERLY MARGIN OF SAID ROAD +v + HE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 123.5 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LIN4.0F THE NORTH HALF OFTHE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2.9, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: THE EAST 123.5 FEET OF THE WEST 247 FEET OF THE EAST 1,291.5 FEET OF PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, LYING NORTH OF NEIL COUNTY ROAD "NOW SOUTH 359TH STREET" IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21- NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriterialnstrumentNumber&quickSearch Selection=# 4/6 12/5/2018 Landmark Web Official Records Search Instrument Number: 2180919000678 Document:. AS Rec: $104.00 Wage-� Record Date:9/19/2018 2:30 PM Ding County, OVA FXRTETT B CES' / d11rEXHIBIT C/V/[ ZVO/,VELNINO 0 SURAMMO SOKALSKYY B. ACCESS/UTILITY EASEMENT •a - 2;n1,ss W. SM o rx: tus�.nea-+zea• 8/8/2018 1Vf w. ML UM ener,lrealc•pgrinacsm . N. UNE. N. 1/2. S. 1/2. SE 1A NE 1/4 143.82' 123:50' w z a w z i , a z o I N I r a �+ I � CITY 4F FEDERAL STAY I N �hFw rar.iivc l�sa�ess�ti,l _o 0 n PARCEL B Z f- O Z U' a 0 208.03' PARCEL A 2921049091 #18-102925-00-SU S. 359TH ST N N CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COUNTY OF KING STATE OF WASHINGTON JOB 18066 1 INDEX S£ 1/4 OF NE 1/4 SEC. 29, T21N, R4E.. W.M. https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriteriainstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 5/6 12/5/2018 Landmark Web Official Records Search Instrument Number: 20A0919000678 Document:LL-6 Rec: $104.00 Page-( Record Date:9/19/2018 2:30 PM Ding County, MIA EXHIBIT' C- LEGAL DESCRIPTION 25' ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT THE EAST25 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT NORTH 01'21'39' WEST361.14 FEET FROM THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 28 AND 29 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 88'56'18" WEST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 359TH STREET A DISTANCE OF 1044.51 FEET; _ - THENCE NORTH Or21'39" EAST 30.00 FEET O THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID SOUTH 359TH STREET; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 01'21'39" eAST'140.12 FEETTO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 01'21.'39" EAST:140.12 FEETTO THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 88031'33" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 267.32 FEETTO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 01.'30'18" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 141.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88'43'56" EAST 267.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SO UTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER'OF.SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. 17067 8/10/2018 hops:11record sea rch.kingcounty.gay/LandmarkWeblsearchlindex?theme blue§ion= sea rchCriterialnstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 616 7/30/2018 Landmark Web Official Records Sea /rr-b 014 F3 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: DevCo, Inc. Attn: D. Ratliff Plaza Center 10900 NE P Str+eet, Suite 1200 Bellevue, WA 98004 1 20140530002015 FIRST AMERICAN AG-RER 83.00 PAGE-001 OF 012 05/30/2014 16:14 KING COUNTY, WA DocumentTitle(s) (or transactions contained therein): x- Boundary Line Agreement, Grantor(s) Name (last, first; and initials)- 2. John A Vermeulen 2. Mary E Vermeulen ❑ Additional Names on Page of Document Grantee(s) Name (last, first, and initials): 3- Park 16, LLC 2. ❑ Additional Names on Page of Document Legal Description (Abbreviated i.e. lot►block and plat or section, township and range) A portion of N'A of SE 2A of NE 2A of Section 29, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County. ❑ Legal Description is on pages of Document. Reference Number(s) of Documents Assigned or Released: z. Record of Survey 2❑ i y ati i L4gppoo I ❑ Additional Reference Numbers on Page of Document Assessors Tax Parcel J Account Number(S) 292104-9095-05; 292204-9207-02 and 292204QOQ1and 29gjMotao ll1z"WM ,mat 1218/-556u XZa120126/63.1 https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriterialnstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 1/12 7/30/2018 _—.) Landmark Web Official Records Seam Boundary Line Agreement (By Adjoining Owners, Pursuantto RCW 58.o4.007(1)) This Boundary Line Agreement("Agreement' is made between John A Vermeulen and Mary_ E Vermeulen. ("Neighbor') and Park 16, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, ("Developer'). s. RECITALS 2.2 Neighbor and Developer are the owners of contiguous parcels of real property in King County, Washington, that share a common boundary along the northern boundary line of the property owned by Neighbor and the southern boundary line of the property owned by Developer. 3-2 An uncertainty exists as to the true and correct common boundary. 1.3 The parties to this Agreement desire to resolve this uncertainty and have agreed upon a mutually acceptable location for the -common boundary and the ownership line between their respective properties ('Agreed Boundary'. The Agreed Boundary is shown on the Survey referenced in Section 2.1.3 below and is depicted in greater detail on Exhibit "A q 2- AGREEMENT TO REVISE BOUNDARY 2.2 Pursuant to the provisions of RCW Chapter 58.04.007(2) and in consideration of the mutual benefits in resolving the uncertainty regarding the location of the common boundary between their respective properties, Neighbor and Developer agree as follows: 2.i.i That the Neighbor's property shall from this time forward be legally described as set forth on Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein bythis reference. 2a.2 That the Developer's property shall from this time forward be legally described as set forth on F_1dlibit "C' and incorporated herein by this reference. 2.1.3 That the Record of Survey recorded under King County Auditors File No. ?p4g1)q ly4omo j ("Surveys accurately depicts the location of the Agreed Boundary between the properties. pmtzr6s 14=4 2 12187-5MULE ?sLlMUS7b3.1 https:Hrecordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriteriainstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 2/12 7/30/2018 Landmark Web Official Records Searr_h� 2.2 it is understood and acknowledged by the parties that no additional parcels are being created and that the sole purpose of entering into this Agreement is to resolve the uncertainty as to the common boundary between their respective properties. 2.3 Concurrently with execution of this Agreement, Neighbor shall convey any interest it has north of the Agreed Boundary to Developer using Quit Claim Deed LPB Form 22-o5o(i) (Rev. 2212oo6). 2.4 Neighbor shall also promptly arrange with beneficiary of the Deed of Trust recorded under King County Auditor's File No. NIA for a partial reconveyance of property north of the Agreed Boundary described above and shall work with any other creditors to obtain partial releases of any other monetary encumbrances that affect such strip. Such reconveyance and release(s) shall be in form and content reasonably satisfactory to Developer. Neighbor shall use its best efforts to cause beneficiary to effect such partial reconveyance as soon as practicable after the mutual execution of this Agreement. 2.5 No consideration is being paid in connection with the conveyance of the property north of Agreed Boundary. Any consideration that may have been given by Developer to Neighbor in connection with this Agreement was paid solely as an accommodation for Neighbor's cooperation and any inconvenience that Neighbor might have encountered in connection with this Agreement. -However, in the event that excise tax is owed on the conveyance, Developer agrees to pay same: 3. FURTHER ASSURANCES 3.1 If at any time after the parties execute this Agreement a procedural boundary line adjustment to establish the Agreed Boundary ("PBLA) is required or appropriate to construct or operate the Park 16 project or to otherwise develop or operate Developer's property, Developer shall have the right to initiate the same with the underlying governmental authority. In such event, Developer shall solely direct the PBLA process, including creating all surveys, preparing all applications and submitting any other required documents, and Developer shall pay for all costs associated with such PBLA; provided, however, that if property taxes must be paid in connection therewith, each party shall pay such taxes fortheir own property_ Further, in such event, Neighbor shall fully cooperate with Developer to complete the PBLA take any actions necessary or appropriate in connection therewith and timely execute, acknowledge, and deliver all reasonable documents required or appropriate in connection therewith, including applications, affidavits, surveys, and similar instruments. JIM29 ,mq 12187-556MECAL124M63.1 https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriterialnstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 3/12 7/30/2018 Landmark Web Official Records Search 3.2 Neighbor agrees to perform any further acts and to execute, acknowledge and deliver any other reasonable documents that may be necessary or appropriate to cant' out the intent of this Agreement promptly after any request from Developerto do the same. 4. MISCELLANEOUS. 4.1 Neighbor, for itself and its future heirs, successors and assigns, hereby fully releases and relinquishes anypresent orfuture interests, claims orotherrights of prescription or adverse possession that Neighbor, Neighbor's property or any improvements thereon may have with respect to the property lying north of the Agreed Boundary and further hereby waives any claims or disputes that Neighbor may have with respect to the Agreed Boundary. 4.2 This Agreement runs with the land and is perpetual and binding on the parties hereto, their heirs, devisees, successors -and assigns. 4.3 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and venue for any action shall lie in King County- if any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, unlawful or unenforceable by any court, the remaining provisions of this Agreement and,,, any portions thereof that are not invalid, unlawful or unenforceable shall not be affected orimpaired thereby. 4-4 This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original and all of which together constitute�on'e and the same instrument [signatures on following page] „2D12V$A- ,A=, 4 12197-55Q9XZ L1201W63-r https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriterialnstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 4/12 7/30/2018 Landmark Web Official Records S@3Mh_,, �1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer and Neighbor have executed this Agreement as of the dates set forth below. DEVELOPER- Per: Park 16 Manager, LLC Name: E n J. Hunden Date Thle:_ Managinu Member NEIGHWR: �4 AJA—J Print N e: Join A Vermeult-r Date KMU'AVOVAtAz (�d�av=ulen Date [12M2SM31.doa] 121515%1AJWxAL1NIM63.1 �-2q-dq https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriteriainstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 5/12 7/30/2018 —.1 Landmark Web Official Records Sea DEVELOPER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of Wadhington ) ) ss County e ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me as the _ of the limited Qabifity company that signed the within and Foregoing Instrument, and said person acknowledged that was authorized to sip this instrument on behalf of said company and aclowmAedged it to be the free and voluntary act of said company for the uses and purposes mentioned in this Instrument Nctary Seal rntliype Name: NOTARY PUBLIC in and forthe State of Washington Revdtny al My apontrnerrtexpires: --- — NEIGHBOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS) State of Washington ) )ss Countyof ,+ ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that J O h — f u �± + Is the person who appeared before me and said person admow)edged that ti --C- signed this Instrument and azvkwvoledged it to be _ 1N, iS —flee and voluntary act forth& uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dated: JENNIFER:A. SHOOK STATE OF WASHINGTON NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES (tmt2M nmol 12197-55iIA cru.U01267a.t e Name: ,t— - 4— IN �,)7t , PUBLIC In and forthe State of Washington appod�� https://recordsearch.kingcounty-govILandmarkWeblsearch/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriteriainstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 6/12 7/30/2018 Landmark Web Official Records Searr..ty State of Washington ) )ss County of ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that —W�ow E _ - �� L v "-' �U" 1't •� - - - is the person who appeared beefart me and said person acknowledged that. L signed this instrument and acknmviedged It to be ✓ free and vokmtaryact for the uses and pvrpos% mentioned in this antrvmeot Dated: `-t b,11 I y rint/TypeName 1-1w A 56a - JENNIFER A. SHOOK TARY PUBLIC in and for the state of Washington STATE OF WASMNGTONResiding at a NOTARY PUBLIC apporntmentexpires: 'D r W COMMISSION EXPIRES ti2D72FM-1A=3 7 12197-5561dEGAL12a126763.1 https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriterialnstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 7/12 7/30/2018 —.} Landmark Web Official Records Seam 1 EXHIBIT"A° TO BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT SKM EXMrr A ARE RASMz ON CM9TY s RECOMS (DEW OR #8 AS� WFORWAMN GRAPHIC SCALF. Pi HOGVRE FENCE :i4GP1i RE FETdCE 14Z76' T-W�z/'L' 2d.50' 12a,50' N, OF THE TPN 29ZO49060 2 OF THE WN 2921049089 Of T» /4 OF TKE lit<1/4 SEC, 29--21 4 f I (Iw =) }� TPN 2921049091 o SE 114, NE1 /4, 5EC29,1WP. 2 M RM 4, WAL C31Y OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, 5V RiNGTON www j0dw=P UM )MM DATE Axis13005 HE 126th PL 14-012 4(7/14 ....A.D . 98034 MAWNM CHECKEDBY TEL 42SM3-5700 TIO 5PIR Survey & Mapping FAx 425m3-6700 SCALE0S 1"-sw 1 OF 1 11=207P ADC4 12197 5561AEGAL120126763_ 1 8 https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriteriainstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 8/12 7/30/2018 Landmark Web Official Records Seams EXHIBIT'B' TO BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT LEGAL. DESCRIPTION OF NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY [1mt ,A=4 12197-536iALECI►LIM1126 63.1 https:l/reoordseareh.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriterialnstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 9112 7/30/2018 Landmark Web Official Records Sear t New Legal Description TAX PARM NU M MOMIN THE E45T T23.5 FEET OF THE WEST 247 FEET OF THE EAST 1291.5 FEET OF PORMON OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER. LYFNG NORTH OF NEFL COUNTY ROAD "NOW SOUTH 3591H STREET IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. W.M.. RECOROS OF KING COUNTY WASHINGTON. EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LIN£ OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SWTHEAST OVARTEF OF THE HORTHEM QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOMMEP 21 KORTN. RAMC£ 4 EAST, WAfl.. RECOiF#7S OF WNG MtHTY W,+sMMOTON. -A x: SE 1 /4, NE 114, SEC. 29, TWP. 21N, RGE 4E, WX �T>� C17Y OF FEDERAL WAY, KM COUNTY, STAYS OF WASHEWMN � s'_•.`Pfn W 6aEq wr11 13005 NE 126th PL Axi FtSAICLANp. lVA 96Q34 1t� Pta DATE TEI. <25.823-576D 14-012 417/14 Survey & Mapping FAX 425,823-6700 DAAIITF BY ClEa BY I,M12 ,A=4 10 12187-5561/IMAL120=63.1 https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriterialnstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 10/12 7/30/2018 r� Landmark Web Official Records Seam k New Legal Description TAX PARCEL K140113t; MOMW THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29. TOWPAW 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT NORTH 0O1415' VIEST 391.15 FEET FROM THE QUARTER CORNER BETMN SECTIONS 28 AND 29 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 89M*15" WEST 1044.5 FEET. At= THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF THE NEIL WLINTY ROAD (SOUTH 359TH STREET). AS CONWYED TO K14C COUNTY BY DEED REC#ROM UNDU RECODING NO. 261"2. TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH DM415' WEST 283.09 FEET, THMCE NORTH BW3,5'15' WEST TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST OVARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER: 14ENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST L1NZ :OF SAID SUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF 5A10 NEIL ROAD; TtIENCE SOUTH BOW15' EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID ROAD TO 1HE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 123.5 FEET THEREOF. EST ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST OUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29. Tp1 6311P 21 NORTH, RANGE 4.EAST. W. M„ RECO US OF KING COtNTY WASKRGTON. SE 1/4, NE 1/4, SEC. 29.7WP.21N, RGG 41i, W.M. ggvm CITY OF FW RAI. WAY. KING COUNTY, STA7@ OF WAS WGTON '►,, 49916 S TV Avis13005 NE 12ELh PL KIRKLAND, WA 98034 JOB NO, DATE TEL 425 123-5700 1"12 4/7114 Survey & Mapping FAX 425.823-6700 DMIN 1IY CHECKM BY am SPIR names 14=41 12197-556MMAL120126763.I 11 https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriterialnstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 11/12 7/30/2018 Landmark Web Official Records Searrx+. 1a EXHIBIT"Co TO BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPER'S PROPERTY PARCEL A. - THE NORTH KAU OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE MOIiTF1EAST QUARTER OF SECtION 29, TOWIISIQP 21 FORT!!, RANGE 4 EASTf W.N., Ili KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EKCEVF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER THEREOF; ALSO EXW1 THAT PORTION THEREW LYING EAST OF A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 395 FEET WEST OF THE FAST LINO OF SAID SUBDIY MON; ALSO EUS TTHAT PORTION THEREOF COMYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 598ftL PARCEL IL' THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST Q11lAM IM OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RA ME 4 FAST, V4 J41 IN KING COUNTY, MitASKnvGMN; DCCEI?T THE EAST 30 FEET FOR ROAD AS DISCLOSED BY DSMS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 6630398 ARID 66696". Asseswft Tax Psamd No(s).: 292104-90 "S and 292104-9107-01 nM1267p_14-4 12 12 tad-5M1nEGAL 12oiM63.1 https://recordsearch.kingcounty.gov/LandmarkWeb/search/index?theme=.blue§ion=searchCriterialnstrumentNumber&quickSearchSelection=# 12/12 After Recording Mail to: Bryce H. Dille of Campbell, Dille, Barnett & Smith Attorneys at Law 317 S. Meridian; P.O. Box 488 Puyallup WA 98371 RESUBMITTED NOV 0 9 2018 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Grantor: Pavlo Sokalskyy and Viktoriya Sokalska, husband and wife Grantee: Pavlo Sokalskyy and Viktoriya Sokalska, husband and wife Reference Numbers of Documents Assigned or Released: Abbreviated Legal Description: Ptn of SE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of Sec. 29, Twnshp 21 N, R 4 E of the W.M., King County Complete legal is on Page 4 of document Assessor's Tax Parcel No.: 292104906006, 292104909109 EASEMENT THE UNDERSIGNED, Pavlo Sokalskyy and Viktoriya Sokalska, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Sokalskyy") do hereby execute this Grant of Easement according to the following terms and conditions set forth herein. RECITALS 1. Sokalskyy are the owners of certain real property situated in the city of Federal Way, King County, Washington, the legal descriptions of which are attached hereto and marked as Exhibit A. 2. Sokalskyy are doing a boundary line adjustment with respect to said properties under City of Federal Way BLA No. 18-102925-00-SU. A copy of the proposed BLA is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 3. In connection with any consideration of doing the boundary line adjustment, it is necessary that an easement be granted with respect to ingress, egress and utilities over and across Easement Page 1 of 3 the East 25 feet of Parcel B of the above referenced boundary line adjustment for the benefit of Parcel A of the boundary line adjustment. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the parties do hereby state as follows: 1. Grant of Easement. Sokalskyy do hereby grant, subject to the terms and conditions herein, a non-exclusive perpetual easement for purposes of the construction and maintenance of utilities as well as for access and the construction of any improvements in connection therewith, over and across the property described as the Access and Utility Easement which is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit C. 2. Maintenance of Improvements. The benefited parcel with respect to this easement is Parcel A of the City of Federal Way boundary line adjustment 18-142925-00-SU, and therefore the owners of that property will be solely responsible for the repair and maintenance of the utilities and any access improvements installed or constructed on the above described access and, utilities easement. Furthermore the owners of said Parcel A and their successors in interest do hereby agree to indemnify and hold the owners of Parcel B of the above referenced boundary line adjustment harmless and indemnify therm from any claims, loss, suits or actions which may be instituted against them arising out of or in connection with the use and maintenance of the above described easement. 3. Attorney's Fees. In the event that it is necessary to institute any legal action to enforce any of the terms and provisions herein, the prevailing party in such legal action shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorney's fees and costs of suit. 4. Binding Effect. This grant of easement and the terms and conditions contained herein shall be binding not only on the parties hereto, but their heirs, successors and assigns, and said grant of easement shall run with the land. 5. Entire Agreement. This grant of easement constitutes the entire agreement with respect to the subject matter herein, and cannot be modified or amended, except in writing, signed by all affected parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this easement and agreement on the day of QbUkon.�, 2018. �e Pavlo Sokalsk Viktoriya Sokals Easement Page 2 of 3 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF PIE� ) § E� On this day personally appeared before me Pavlo Sokalskyy and Viktoriya Sokalska, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. C GIVEN under my hand and official seal this U day of 4.WI r- 2019. MY SU! NGl'J�R'! PUBLIC ME IyCaw+i�iMf%MM'ch 1420 Printed Name: I NOTARY PUBLIC in and Washington, residing at My commission expires: _ State of Easement Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A The land in the County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT NORTH 00014'15" WEST 391.15 FEET FROM THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 28 AND 29 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 89035'15" WEST 1044.5 FEET, ALONG THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF THE NEIL COUNTY ROAD (SOUTH 359TH STREET), AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2616092, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00014'15" WEST 283.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89035'15" WEST TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID NEIL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 89035'15" EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID ROAD TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 123.5 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: THE EAST 123.5 FEET OF THE WEST 247 FEET OF THE EAST 1,291.5 FEET OF PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, LYING NORTH OF NEIL COUNTY ROAD "NOW SOUTH 359TH STREET' IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. z 1b 0 w d m Z J 3r N ¢7 N M ■ RESUBMITTED NOV a 9 2818 CF.S.N*r WC .OF I Nrr v&WALSKYY C/V/i ENG/NEER/NG If SURVEY/NG ACCESS/UTILITY EASEMENT 429 — 29TH ST. NE, SUITE D PIT: (253) 848-4282 PUYALLUP, WA 98372 ceservices®cesnwinc.com N. LINE, N. 112, S. 1/2, SE 1/4, NE 1/4 '. 43. i2' 1123.50' w z O J J Q z c� 0 0 PARCEL A 2921049091 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BLA #18-102925-00-SU NEW 144.53' 0 0 M N88'43'56"W 267.67' PARCEL B 2921049060 Z J H O J J Q Z U' fif 268.03' 1 S. 359TH ST. SCALE: 1 "= 50 50 0 50 100 z z m w a w r J H ui W U U Q Ln N EXHIBIT B 8/8/2018 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COUNTY OF KING STATE OF WASHINGTON JOB 18066 INDEX: SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 SEC. 29, T21N, R4E., W.M. RESUBMITTED NOV 0 9 2018 EXHIBIT "A" MYOF�FEDEPALWAy LEGAL DESCRIPTION 30' ACCESS & UTILITY EA EMEN��E�'�pM�� THE EAST 25 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT POINT NORTH 01°21'39' WEST 361.14 FEET FROM THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 28 AND 29 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 88°56'18" WEST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 359TH STREET A DISTANCE OF 1044.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'21'39" EAST 30.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID SOUTH 359TH STREET; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 01°21'39" EAST 140.12 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 01°21'39" EAST 140.12 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 88°31'33" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 267.32 FEETTO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 01*30'18" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 141.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°43'56" EAST 267.67 FEETTO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. #ANAa Ad \p�,,, �8985 ���t'¢� �Q�AL LA��� `IH. .e ■ 17067 8/10/2018 CES • NW INCORPORATED CIVIL. ENGINEERING & SURVEYING November 8, 2018 Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner City of Federal Way 33325 80' Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 RESUBMITTED NOV 0 9 2018 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RE: File #18-102925-00-SU; LETTER OF COMPLETENESS/PRELEVIINARY TECHNICAL COMMENTS #2 Sokalskyy BLA (359' Street), Parcel #'s 292104-9060 & 9091, Federal Way Dear Ms. Willoughby -Oakes: Thank you for the opportunity to respond to your comments received for the Sokalskyy BLA Application, on 08/06/18. Preliminary Technical Comments L. Willoughby -Oakes, Planner, 253-835-2644, leila.willoughbvoakes(a)cityoffederalivay.com 1. Add application file no. 18-102925-00-SU to title blocks. Response: The application number has been added to the title blocks. 2. Please find BLA redlines enclosed. Response: Acknowledged. 3. Please add BLA map notes stating the date of the wetland delineation, author, and city approval date. Response: The wetland information has been added to sheet two. 4. Please depict/label offsite wetlands pursuant to FWRC 19.145.410. The Spring Valley Open Space wetland complex is a high category wetland and valued community asset; off -site wetlands which have their buffers on the subject property shall be depicted. There are two separate wetlands on/within 225 feet of the properties. a. Identify and characterize all wetlands and buffers on and within 225 feet of the subject property. For off -site areas with limited or no access, estimate conditions using best available information. Please note the off -site wetland areas are owned by the city and you have permission to access these areas in order to conduct an accurate reconnaissance. 429 2911' St NE, Suite D - Puyallup, WA 98372 P: 253.848.4282 -- F: 253.848.4278 www.cesnwinc.com • Page 2 November 8, 2018 Response: _ Wetlands and buffers identified and labeled. 5. Please add the following notes to the BLA: All future development actions are subject to FWRC 19.145.160 'Building Setbacks', and FWRC 19.145.180 'Critical Area Markers, Signs and Fences.' Res onsee.Note added to page 2 of the map. 6. Add easement and recording numbers from the title report, in particular the boundary line agreement (label) as "Special Exceptions and Restrictions' on the BLA drawing. Res oonnse: All easements labeled. 7. You must record a shared access easement over resulting Parcel B. Please see Kevin Peterson's comments below. The city shall review and approve easement language prior to recording per FWRC 19. Response An easement has been created and will be recorded once approved. Note the total easement area. Resulting Parcels, A and B should show the 'net' area, versus gross area. Vehicular access areas cannot be counted towards total lot area requirements. The s ubject property zoned RS 15.0; the lots mus t maintain a mini in u in lot s i ze of 15,000 square feet. Response.- Items have been noted on the map. PW Development Services, Kevin Peterson, 253-835-2734, Ke►in.PetersonPcitvoffcdcraI%vay.coin 9. Add the City file number in the space provided on the title block. Response' The application number has been added to the title blocks. 10. Vertical datum shall be per City standard: NGVD-29. RespolVertical datum has been updated to NGVD-29. 11. There are a couple of easements identified in the Title Report. These easements shall be shown on the BLA drawings, OR, if there isn't sufficient information to show the easement, then it shall be noted on the drawings, and identified as 'non -locatable'. Response: Easement s have been shown on the map. 12. The new north lot will need to have an access easement across the south lot. Response: An easement has been created. 13. There's an existing gravel driveway on the west side of existing parcel 292104-9091 that appears to be in use by the neighboring parcel to the east. If there's an existing easement for this driveway, please identify it on the drawing. If no easement exists and the driveway is to remain, an easement will need to be recorded and shown on the BLA drawings. The applicant should be aware that any easement could affect the 'buildable' area of the lot. • Page 3 November 8, 2018 Response: An easement has been created. 14. The City has minimum easement/driveway width requirements for shared access driveways, which depend on the number of properties using the access. City standard details 3-2CC and 3-2DD show the required minimums for shared access driveways. City standard details can be found at h :1/docs.ci offederalway.com/ WEBLIN K/Browse.a x'? tartid=748626. Response: Thank you, acknowledged. South King Fire & Rescue, Chris Cahan, 253-946-7243, Chris.Cahan@southkingfire.org Water Supply A Certificate of Water Availability shall be requested from the water district and provided at the time of building permit application. Response: Thank you, acknowledged. Fire Hydrants Existi ng fire hydrant meets requirements for hydrant location. 1�esporrse: Thank you, acknowledged. Fire Sprinklers Determination of requirements for residential fire sprinklers, if any, are made at the time of building permit application. Response: Thank you, acknowledged. If you have anyAuesoons, please do not hesitate to contact me. Deaver CES • NW INCORPORATED CIVIL. ENGINEERING & SURVEYING July 31, 2018 Leila Willoughby — Oakes RESUBMITTED City of Federal Way 33325 8t' Avenue South JUL 3 1 2018 Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 CrrY OF FEDERAL WAY Dear Leila, COMMUNrrY DEVELOPMENT This is our resubmittal for the BLA for the Sokalskyy parcel 292104-9060, that was rejected for missing items including the wetlands report. Based on the provided comments, our submittal packet is complete. Our intent is to rotate the lots with buffers for the protection of the wetlands. This has been discussed with the wetland biologist and will protect all of the wetland. After approval of the BLA we anticipate a reasonable use application will be required for the building permit submittal. Thank you for your)"e and consideration with this application. Thank 429 2911, St NE, Suite D - Puyallup, WA 98372 P:253.848.4282 F:253.848.4278 www.cesnwinc.com 41k Federal Way APPLICATION NO(S) RESUBMITTED JUL 31 2018 MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DF.P:1R r%IFNT OF ('1?:S MUNITTv DFVRt.nP\IF.N-r 33 32i g,s Avenue South CTY OF FEDERAL WAY Fedcrai W:n. H'A W1103-6325 COMMUNMY DEVELOPMENT a3-835-2607: Fax 253-835-2eo9 Project Name Feder@1 W h BLA Date C8f14;2016 Property Address/Location POR OF S 1,2 OF SE 1A OF NE VA LY NLY OF NEAL RD _ESS E 1168 FT Parcel Number(s) 2921049060 8 2921 D49091 Project Description Application for a Boundary Line Adtustmmnt for fa 2 lot project. K.EASE PRI%rT Type of Permit Required Annexation _ Binding Site Plan x Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezonc Land Surface Modification _ Lot Line Elimination PreapplIcvtion Conference Process I (Direclor's Approval) _ Process Ii (Site Plan Review) _ Process III (Project Approval) _ Process IV (Hearing F-uaminer's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI _ SEPA w/Project _ SEPA Only Shorcline: Variance/Conditional Use _ Short Subdivision _ Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information RS15.0 Gfnin Designation Comprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements bier ariunal Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type --Construction Type Applicant Name: CES NW, Inc Address: 310 29th ST NE. Suite 1 City/State: PuvalluD. WA Zip: 98372 Phone: 253-848-4 Fax: 253-848 78 Email: Me7'/'011 cesnw c.c m Signature: Agent (if diffeneot Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: Pavlo and Viktoriva Sokalskvv Address: 1210 m st se 33 city;slate: Auburn. Wa Zip; 98002 Phone: Fax: Ema`: Wawusinc@vahoo.com Signature: �� Bulletin 49103 — January 1, 2011 Page I of I k:tl landuuts•;Masler Land Use Application CITY OF Federal Way Centered on Opportu-nit.;f July 26, 2018 FILE CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Dawn Markakis Emailed: dmarkakis@cesnwinc.com CES NW Inc. 310 291' St. NE, Suite 101 Puyallup, WA 98372 RE: File #18-102925-00-SU; INCOMPLETE APPLICATION Sokalskyy/S. 359`h St. BLA, Parcel #'s 292104-9060 & - 9091, Federal Way Dear Ms. Markakis: The Community Development Department received your July 3, 2018, boundary line adjustment application for the abovementioned tax parcels. The subject property contains Category I and II wetlands on- and off -site per the city's critical area mapping and inventory. The abutting tax parcels (292104-9006 and -9107) and subject property contain Spring Valley Open Space Wetland and wetland buffers. Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 18.10, "Boundary Line Adjustment," the City shall determine application completeness within 28 days. INCOMPLETE APPLICATION During the course of the city's review, the following items were found to be missing or incomplete. Pursuant to FWRC 18.10.030, the city will determine application completeness. A BLA shall be submitted to the city and include, if applicable, FWRC Title 19, Division V, regarding environmentally sensitive areas, completed checklists or other required environmental documentation. r Submit three copies of a wetland delineation report containing the information found in FWRC 19.145.410. TECHNICAL COMMENTS Please address the following comments prior to Community Development Department approval: Sheet I 1. Add City of Federal Way File #18-102925-00-SU. 2. Provide a scaled vicinity map with labeled streets. Sheet 2 Provide the location of environmentally critical areas and their buffers. Please label wetlands on or within 225 ft. of the subject property (BLA Checklist Item L) and please clearly label map symbols/lines in the legend: a. Wetland b. Wetland buffer (noting the width) c. 5 ft. critical area BSBL Ms. Markakis July 26, 2018 Page 2 of 2 4. Provide the area in sq. ft. of the new lots. Provide the area of the original lots in sq. ft. 5. If feasible please provide copies and show the location of all existing and proposed recorded easements or restrictions etc. affecting the parcels for Development Services Division review (Checklist Item H). 6. List the recording numbers and descriptions in the title report on the face of the BLA map. 7. Remove `North Neil Road'. 8. Label the width of 16"' Ave. S. 9. Add the critical area report author, title, date prepared under BLA notes. CLOSING Please resubmit with the enclosed form. The department will notify you within 14 days of receiving additional information if your application is considered complete or what, if any, information is still needed. Pursuant to FWRC 18.05.080.1, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the city shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. Traffic, Development Services, Building, South King Fire & Rescue and Lakehaven Water and Sewer District review comments will follow under separate cover after the application is deemed complete. Should you have any questions please contact me at 253-835-2644, or leila.willou hb - oakes@,cityoffederalwgy.com. Sincerely, c4at*v 4zlo;�P, Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Form BLA Submittal Checklist c: Pavlo and Viktoriya Sokalskyy,1210 M Street SE, Auburn WA, 98002, emailed: wawus-iric@,yahoo.com Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager I8-102925-00-SU Doc. I.D. 78074 `UBMITTE CITY OF V� Federal Way APPLICATION Now J U L 0 3 2018 MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF CoNniuNiTY DF.VF.t.oPmF.N-r Cm, FEDERALOF WAY 33325 8'h Avenue South Federal Way. WA 98 COMMUNriY DEVELQNE1�f (1().3-6325 253-8 35-2607: Fax 25 3-835-2609 Project Name Feder! Way39_+,h BSA_ Date ra ` — 1— I lj Property Address/Location POR OF S V2 OF SE 1/4 OF NE 114 LY NLY OF NEAL RD LESS E 1168 FT Parcel Number(s) 2921049060 &2921oaso91 Project Description Application for a Boundary Line Adjustment for fa 2 lot project. mires rsEn i Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan x Boundary Line Adjust rent Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification _ Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process H (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use _ Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information RS 15.0 "Zoning Designation Comprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements bitemational Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type Construction Type Applicant Name: CES NW, Inc Address: 310 29th ST NE. Suite 10 City/State: PuvallUD. WA Zip: 98372 Phone: 253-848-4 Fax: 253-84$ 78 Email: caeav cesnw c.c m Signature: ,/ 1_/ Agent (if different Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: Pavlo and Viktoriva Sokalskvv Address: 1210 m st se 33 city%state: Auburn. Wa Zip: 98002 Phone: Fax: 1 t"ail: Wawusinc@vahoo.com S i�,nauf re:� a Bulletin #003 —January 1. 2011 Page 1 01' 1 k:�Handouts%Matitcr Land Use Application C*E*So NW Inc. Civil Engineering & Sirrveyiq 18066 RESUBMITTED JUL 3 1 2018 �M UMTTFEDERAL EV OPMENT Lot Closure Calculations SOKALSITY BLA 310 29TM ST NE, STE 101 PUYALLUP, WA 98372 PHONE: 253-848-4282 FAX:253-848-4278 Parcel name: ORIGINAL PARCEL A N Line Line Line E Course: N 01-21-39 E North: 105970.36 Course: N 88-31-33 W North: 105973.54 Course: S 01-21-39 W North: 105692.49 Line Course: S 88-56-18 E North: 105690.20 ast : 1271942.42 Length: 290.24 East: 1271949.07 Length: 123.50 East : 1271825.61 Length: 281.13 East : 1271818.94 Length: 123.50 East: 1271942.41 Perimeter: 808.37 Area: 34,664 sq.ft. 0.80 acres Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.00 Course: S 60-20-43 W Error North: -0.001 East: -0.001 Precision 1:808,370,000.00 Parcel name: NEW PARCEL A North: 105690.20 East : 1271942.42 Line Course: N 01-21-39 E Length: 140.12 North: 105830.28 East: 1271945.74 Line Course: N 88-43-56 W Length: 267.67 North: 105836.21 East: 1271678.14 Line Course: S 01-30-18 W Length: 141.08 North: 105695.17 East: 1271674.43 Line Course: S 88-56-18 E Length: 268.03 North: 105690.21 East: 1271942.42 Perimeter: 816.91 Area: 37,660 sq.ft. 0.86 acres Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.01 Course: N 19-35-00 E Error North: 0.005 East: 0.002 Precision 1:81,690.00 18066 2 Parcel name: ORIGINAL PARCEL B North: 105692.49 East: 1271818.93 Line Course: N 01-21-39 E Length: 281.13 North: 105973.54 East : 1271825.61 Line Course: N 88-31-33 W Length: 143.82 North: 105977.24 East: 1271681.84 Line Course: S 01-30-18 W Length: 282.17 North: 105695.17 East: 1271674.43 Line Course: S 88-56-18 E Length: 144.53 North: 105692.49 East : 1271818.93 Perimeter: 851.64 Area: 40,605 sq.ft. 0.93 acres Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.00 Course: N 87-44-05 W Error North: 0.000 East : -0.002 Precision 1:851,650,000.00 Parcel name: NEW PARCEL B North: 105830.28 East: 1271945.74 Line Course: N 01-21-39 E Length: 140.12 North: 105970.36 East: 1271949.07 Line Course: N 88-31-33 W Length: 267.32 North: 105977.24 East: 1271681.84 Line Course: S 01-30-18 W Length: 141.08 North: 105836.21 East: 1271678.13 Line Course: S 88-43-56 E Length: 267.67 North: 105830.29 East: 1271945.74 Perimeter: 816.19 Area: 37,610 sq.ft. 0.86 acres Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.01 Course: N 49-17-42 W Error North: 0.004 East : -0.005 Precision 1:81,619.00 18066 3 CES • NW INCORPORATED CIVIL ENGINEERING & SURVEYING November 8, 2018 Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner City of Federal Way 33325 8' Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 65 RESUBMITTED NOV 0 9 2018 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNr Y DEVELOPMENT RE: File #18-102925-00-SU; LETTER OF COMPLETENESS/PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL COMMENTS #2 Sokalskyy BLA (359" Street), Parcel #'s 292104-9060 & 9091, Federal Way Dear Ms. Willoughby -Oakes: Thank you for the opportunity to respond to your comments received for the Sokalskyy BLA Application, on 08/06/ 18. Preliminary Technical Comments L. Willoughby -Oakes, Planner, 253-835-2644, leila.willoualit)voakes(ir�citvoffederalway.com 1. Add application file no. 18-102925-00-SU to title blocks. Response: The application number has been added to the title blocks 2. Please find BLA redlines enclosed. Response: Acknowledged. 3. Please add BLA map notes stating the date of the wetland delineation, author, and city approval date. Response: The wetland information has been added to sheet two. 4. Please depict/label offsite wetlands pursuant to FWRC 19.145.410. The Spring Valley Open Space wetland complex is a high category wetland and valued community asset; off -site wetlands which have their buffers on the subject property shall be depicted. There are two separate wetlands on/within 225 feet of the properties. a. Identify and characterize all wetlands and buffers on and within 225 feet of the subject property. For off -site areas with limited or no access, estimate conditions using best available information. Please note the off -site wetland areas are owned by the city and you have permission to access these areas in order to conduct an accurate reconnaissance. 429 2911, St NE, Suite D - Puyallup, WA 98372 P: 253.848.4282 -- F: 253.848.4278 www.cesnwinc.com • Page 2 November 8, 2018 Response: Wetlands and buffers identified and labeled. 5. Please add the following notes to the BLA: All future development actions are subject to FWRC 19. 145.160 'Building Setbacks', and FWRC 19.145.180 'Critical Area Markers, Signs and Fences.' Response.- Note added to page 2 of the map. 6. Add easement and recording numbers from the title report, in particular the boundary line agreement (label) as "Special Exceptions and Restrictions' on the BLA drawing. Response.- All easements labeled. 7. You must record a shared access easement over resulting Parcel B. Please see Kevin Peterson's comments below. The city shall review and approve easement language prior to recording per FWRC 19. Response: An easement has been created and will be recorded once approved. 8. Note the total easement area. Resulting Parcels, A and B should show the 'net' area, versus gross area. Vehicular access areas cannot be counted towards total lot area requirements. The s ubject property zoned RS 15.0; the lots mus t maintain a mini m u m lot s i ze of 15,000 square feet. Response: Items have been noted on the map. PW Development Services, Kevin Peterson, 253-835-2734, Kevin.Petersonocitvoifederalwav com 9. Add the City file number in the space provided on the title block. Vf_sporrse: The application number has been added to the title blocks. 10. Vertical datum shall be per City standard: NGVD-29. VResponse.• Vertical datum has been updated to NGVD-29. 11. There are a couple of easements identified in the Title Report. These easements shall be shown on the BLA drawings, OR, if there isn't sufficient information to show the easement, then it shall be noted on the drawings, and identified as 'non -locatable'. 11R1 sWonse. Easement s have been shown on the map. 12. The new north lot will need to have an access easement across the south lot. Vltesponse: An easement has been created. (6" re t 0 ►. u S d'� �1� ��� 13. There's an existing gravel driveway on the west side of existing parcel 292104-9091 that appears to be in use by the neighboring parcel to the east. If there's an existing easement for this driveway, please identify it on the drawing. If no easement exists and the driveway is to remain, an easement will need to be recorded and shown on the BLA drawings. The applicant should be aware that any easement could affect the 'buildable' area of the lot. 7 • Page 3 November 8, 2018 VResponzse.' An easement has been created. 14. The City has minimum easement/driveway width requirements for shared access driveways, which depend on the number of properties using the access. City standard details 3-2CC and 3-2DD show the required minimums for shared access driveways. City standard details can be found at lz :Ildocs.cit of ederalwa _com!WEBLfN K/Browse.a x'? tartid=748626. Response: Thank you, acknowledged. South King Fire & Rescue, Chris Cahan, 253-946-7243, C h ris. Cahan *south kingfire.org Water Supply A Certificate of Water Availability shall be requested from the water district and provided at the time of building permit application. Response: Thank you, acknowledged. Fire Hydrants Existi ng fire hydrant meets requirements for hydrant location. Response: Thank you, acknowledged. Fire Sprinklers Determination of requirements for residential fire sprinklers, if any, are made at the time of building permit application. Response: Thank you, acknowledged. If you have anyAuesjons, please do not hesitate to contact me. Deaver ipal T a- ays. First America x First American Title Insurance Company 920 5th Avenue, Suite 1250 Seattle, WA 98104 November 08, 2018 Dawn Markakis CES Northwest 429 29th Street NE, Suite D Puyallup, WA 98372 Phone:(253)848-4282 Fax: Title Officer: Phone: Fax No.: E-Mail: Order Number: Escrow Number: Buyer: Owner: Property: RES LJ E3 I TTSD NOV 0 9 tot$ IXJCITY U D OF DERA.L WAY EVSL0pME',jT Pat Fullerton (206)615-3055 (866)904-2177 TitleKingWa@firstam.com 3083947 3083947 Sokalskyy Federal Way, Washington 98003 Attached please find the following item(s): Guarantee Thank You for your confidence and support. We at First American Title Insurance Company maintain the fundamental principle: Customer First. iForm 5003353 (7-1-14) Page 1 of 9 Guarantee Number: 3083947 CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75)j Washington) - First American Guarantee Subdivision Guarantee I ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company GUARANTEE NUMBER 5003353-3083947 SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE LIMITS OF LIABILITY AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF THIS GUARANTEE, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a Nebraska corporation, herein called the Company GUARANTEES YUMO Construction LLC the Assured named in Schedule A against actual monetary loss or damage not exceeding the liability stated in Schedule A, which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness In the assurances set forth in Schedule A. First American Title Insurance Company DennisJ Gah;,,,i,. �" J Jeffrey S Robinson Secretary Form 5003353 (7-1-14) JPage 2 of 9 This jacket was created electronically and constitutes an original document Number: 3083947 CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee ( �1 SCH, L.� EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF 1 RANTEE Except to the extent that specific assurances are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters against the title, whether or not shown by the public records. (b) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters excluded under (1) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the public records. (c) (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records. Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the description set forth in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2 of this Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such land abuts, or the right to maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps or any structure or improvements; or any rights or easements therein, unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description. (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, whether or not shown by the public records; (1) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds; (2) which result in no loss to the Assured; or (3) which do not result in the invalidity or potential invalidity of any judicial or non -judicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in this Guarantee. GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. Definition of Terms. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (a) the "Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured in this Guarantee, or on a supplemental writing executed by the Company. (b) "land": the land described or referred to in Schedule (A)(C) or in Part 2, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule (A)(C) or in Part 2, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways. (c) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (d) "public records": records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. (e) "date": the effective date. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant. An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as stated herein, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding. Form 5003353 (7-1-14) IPage 3 of 9 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sole option and cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, interpose a defense, as limited in (b), or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (b) If the Company elects to exercise its options as stated in Paragraph 4(a) the Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor will the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from an adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of such Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all rantee Number: 3083947 CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4- TEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATION:. -�nued) J 6. reasonable aid in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. Proof of Loss or Damage. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral security, to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any claim assured against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosection of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a) the amount of liability stated in Schedule A or in Part 2; (b) the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as lirrnted or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together with interest thereon; or (c) the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or interest subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance assured against by this Guarantee. S. Limitation of Liability. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other matter assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by form 5003353 (7-1-14) Page 4 of 9 Guarantee Number: 3083947 CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Washingto EE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATION! f ,lit.ied) 9. 10. 11 any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (b) In the event of any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as stated herein. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. Reduction of Liability or Termination of Liability. All payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. Payment of Loss. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within thirty (30) days thereafter. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been issued. If requested by the Company, the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured shall have recovered its principal, interest, and costs of collection. Form 5003353 (7-1-14) 113age 5 of 9 12. Arbitration. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Land Title Association. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Liability is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbitrable matters when the amount of liability is in excess of $2,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land is located permits a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 13. Liability Limited to This Guarantee; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14. Notices, Where Sent. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to the Company at First American Title Insurance Company, Attn: Claims National Intake Center, 1 First American Way, Santa Ana, California 92707 Claims.NIC@firstarn.com Phone: 888-632- 1642 Fax: 877-804-7606 �S11 AMER�C First American Title Number: 3083947 CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10- Subdivision Guarantee • First Arneric Schedule A ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company GUARANTEE NUMBER 3083947 Order No.: 3083947 Liability: $2,000.00 Name of Assured: CES Northwest Date of Guarantee: November 01, 2018 The assurances referred to on the face page hereof are: Title is vested in: PAVLO SOKALSKYY AND VIKTORIYA SOKALSKA, A MARRIED COUPLE Fee: $350.00 Tax: $35.35 That, according to the public records relative to the land described in Schedule C attached hereto (including those records maintained and indexed by name), there are no other documents affecting title to said land or any portion thereof, other than those shown under Record Matters in Schedule B. The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this Guarantee A. Unpatented Mining Claims, reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof. B. Water rights, claims or title to water. C. Tax Deeds to the State of Washington. D. Documents pertaining to mineral estates. 4. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown herein. This Guarantee is restricted to the use of the Assured for the purpose of providing title evidence as may be required when subdividing land pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 58.17, R.C.W., and the local regulations and ordinances adopted pursuant to said statute. It is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction affecting title to said property. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment, guarantee or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. Form 5003353 (7-1-14) Page 6 of 9 Guarantee Number: 3083947 CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-1 Washii Subdivision Guarantee First American Schedule B ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company GUARANTEE NUMBER 3083947 RECORD MATTERS 1. Taxes which may be assessed and extended on any subsequent roll for the tax year 2018, with respect to new improvements and the first occupancy which may be included on the regular assessment roll and which are an accruing lien not yet due or payable. 2. Facility Charges, if any, including but not limited to hook-up, or connection charges and latecomer charges for sewer, water and public facilities of Federal Way Water and Sewer District as disclosed by instrument recorded under recording no. 8607010673, 8608041129 and 9301190272. 3. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises as granted by deed recorded under recording no. 2616092. 4. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements; but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, family status, or national origin to the extent such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate Title 42, Section 3604(c), of the United States Codes: Recording Information: 3684147 5. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: May 06, 1969 For: 6506182 6. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: 8508200804 In Favor of: Lakehaven Sewer District, a Municipal Corporation For: Sewer mains with the necessary appurtenances 7. Boundary Line Agreement and the terms and conditions thereof: Between: John A. Vermeulen and Mary E. Vermeulen And: Park 16, LLC, a Washington limited liability company Recording Information: 20140530002015 8. Conditions, notes, easements, provisions and/or encroachments contained or delineated on the face of the Survey recorded under Recording No. 20140414900001. 9. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: 20180919000678 For: a non-exclusive perpetual easement for purposes of the construction and maintenance of utilities as well as for access and the construction of any improvements in connection therewith, over and across the property described as the access and utility easement. Informational Notes, if any Form 5003353 (7-1-14) iPage 7 of 9 Number: 3083947 CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee A. General taxes for the year 2018, which have been paid. Tax Account No.: 292104906006 Code Area: 1205 Amount: $ 1,257.72 Assessed Land Value: $ 90,000.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 Affects Parcel A B. General taxes for the year 2018, which have been paid. Tax Account No.: 292104909109 Code Area: 1205 Amount: $ 1,327.38 Assessed Land Value: $ 95,000.00 Assessed Improvement Value; $ 0.00 Affects Parcel B Form 5003353 (7-1-14) jPage 8 of 9 (Guarantee Number: 3083947 Uri A #14 Sut aivision (juarantee �4 Subdivision Guarantee First American Schedule C ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company GUARANTEE NUMBER 3083947 The land in the County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT NORTH 00014'15" WEST 391.15 FEET FROM THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 28 AND 29 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 89035'15" WEST 1044.5 FEET, ALONG THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF THE NEIL COUNTY ROAD (SOUTH 359TH STREET), AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2616092, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00014'15" WEST 283.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89035'15" WEST TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID NEIL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 89035'15" EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID ROAD TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 123.5 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: THE EAST 123.5 FEET OF THE WEST 247 FEET OF THE EAST 1,291.5 FEET OF PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, LYING NORTH OF NEIL COUNTY ROAD "NOW SOUTH 359TH STREET" IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Form 5003353 (7-1-14) jPage 9 of 9 Number: 3083947 CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4- LE i b eo ti HABITAT TECHNOLOGIES May 10, 2017 Mr. Yuriy Momotyuk @ YUMO Construction LLC 27327 — 48th Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 e-mail yuriym@usa.com Mr. Pavlo Sokalshyy @ Dim Construction Inc. 1210 M Street SE, Suite 33 Auburn, Washington 98002 RESUBMITTED JUL 31 20 C;FN OF FEDERAL WAY CONtMUNfTY DEVELOPMENT RE: Response to City of Federal Way Letter of February 1, 2017 Parcels 2921049060 and 2921049091 South 359th Street, City of Federal Way, King County Dear Project Team, Pursuant to the comments provided in the City of Federal Way letter dated February 1, 2017, Habitat Technologies has completed a series of onsite re -assessments and has met onsite with the City of Federal Way environmental review staff. This re -assessment process has allowed for additional field data collection, an extended review of seasonal hydrology patterns, and an updated wetland delineation. Item #1 — Describe the methods used for determining the boundary of the West Hylebos Wetland Corridor located offsite and west of the project site as shown on Revised Figure 8. Discussion: As identified within the Environmentally Critical Areas Assessment dated June 13, 2016 the West Fork of Hylebos Creek Corridor was located offsite to the west of the project site. The wetland associated with this corridor adjacent to the project site was identified as best meeting the criteria for designation as a City of Federal Way Category I Wetland with a 225-foot standard buffer. This Corridor would also appear to meet the criteria for designation as a City of Federal Way "Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas." Additional assessment was completed between early February and mid -May 2017 to provide a more accurate depiction of the approximate edge of the wetland associated with the West Fork of Hylebos Creek Corridor adjacent to the project site. This additional assessment included additional onsite evaluations and a more detailed review of prior wetland assessment surveys of parcels within the local area. As a result of this additional assessment the approximate wetland boundary has been depicted on the Revised Figure 8 (attached). As with the 2016 assessment, the identified wetland boundary for this offsite corridor was not specifically flagged, wetlands, streams, fisheries, wildlife — mitigation and permitting solutions P.O. Box 1088, Puyallup, Washington 98371 253-845-5119 contact@habitattechnologies.net was not defined by the hand-held field GPS (with the exception of the wetland adjacent to the northern boundary of the project site), and was not professionally surveyed following the 2017 assessment. As defined within the Environmentally Critical Areas Assessment dated June 13, 2016 the project site had been modified by prior land use actions. These actions had included the prior import and placement of fill particularly along the northern boundary of the project site. The offsite wetland to the north was identified at the toe of this prior fill using a hand-held GPS (Off 1 and Off 2) and depicted on the Revised Figure 8. Item #2 — Show the location of all sample plots on Figure W1 and revise field data forms as needed. Discussion: Following the onsite meeting with City of Federal Way environmental review staff a series of additional sample plots was established throughout the project site. The 2107 sample plots are depicted on Revised Figure 8 and were used to provide an updated wetland boundary based on existing site conditions identified between early February and mid -May 2017. The collection of this additional field data, coupled with the 2016 field data, allowed for a refinement of the onsite wetland boundary (Wetland A). The boundary identified during the 2017 assessment period was defined with wooden lath and flagging. Routine mowing of the project site had removed the majority of 2016 wire flagging. As a result of above normal seasonal rainfall events during the early February and mid -May 2017 assessment period the pattern of seasonal surface water movement across the project site was also refined over the 2016 assessment. As noted during 2017 seasonal surface water was identified to move generally from the northeast to the southwest across the project site. No seasonal surface water was identified to enter and travel across the project site from the northern boundary. In addition, no seasonal surface water was identified to exit the site to the west as a result of an elevated buried utility corridor along the entire western boundary of the project site. As noted during the 2016 assessment the onsite surface water appeared to be terminating within the small excavated pond in the southwestern portion of the project site. This area of the excavated pond had been managed as a garden during prior growing seasons. However, as noted during the 2017 assessment onsite surface water was identified to continue to the south from the area of the excavated pond. At the southern boundary of the project site seasonal surface water was identified to enter a created road -side ditch associated with South 359th Street. Once within the created road -side ditch seasonal surface water entered a controlled inlet to a culver leading to the south and out letting to the south of South 359th Street. 16070 As noted in the Environmentally Critical Areas Assessment dated June 13, 2016 Wetland A was best defined as mixture of managed lawn, garden area, and an excavated farm pond. This wetland was dominated by a grass and herb plant community and included a few trees and shrubs generally around the pond. The 2017 assessment also identified that a portion of the created roadside ditch along South 359th Street also exhibited wetland characteristics. This area (flagged onsite as Wetland B) was regularly managed as a part of roadway maintenance actions and appeared best defined as an "intentionally created feature." As such, this roadside ditch would not appear to be regulated as a "wetland" and the City of Federal Way. In addition, this roadside ditch was located offsite and would require City of Federal Way approval for any work within the right of way. Item #3 — Provide an accuracy statement for the wetland boundary mapping and describe the equipment used to survey/locate the wetland flags. Discussion: The location of the onsite wetland boundary and the sample plots was defined use a hand-held GPS (Garman GPS Map 60CSX). While not survey quality, this GPS identified spot locations typically accurate to within five meters. Accuracy increases with a lack of overhead vegetation obstructions and satellite locations. Item #4 — Revise the wetland rating form based on any adjustments to the wetland boundary. Discussion: As noted above the 2017 assessment identified a few additional site variations not identified during the 2016 assessment. Following this assessment, the wetland rating from for Wetland A has been updated (see attached). During the 2016 assessment Wetland A was identified as within a closed depression with no surface water outlet. However, as noted in 2017 Wetland A exhibited a surface water outflow to the south that entered the created roadside ditch associated with South 359th Street. As such, the rating numbers associated with the character of the surface water outflow from the wetland as depicted in questions D.1.1 and D.4.1 were revised from a score of "4" to a score of "2." This change dropped the total wetland score from "20" points to 19" points resulting in a change in wetland category from "II" to "III." The standard buffer for either a Category II or Category III Wetland with a habitat score of 6 or 7 points is 165 feet. Please contact me with any questions or directions. Sincerely, Thomas D. Deming Habitat Technologies 16070 FIGURES 16070 ;. eeeki E ■� � /� .=G■,!!a { k22 »]a 2 J # � � m « - a , c o -= ƒa c�i�� J 2 o 0)a E2 o a a o z. ■ O d ? � � e .� § . 0 -u o §� �- 4 • z a.<)«§ 2 o 2 e a § R � � - 2 \ 2 o z CD � � a 2 k 0 2 �■ � _ - ©`` ) { / ` 0 0 r d u « } / & G _ � ., .. , CL •_ m . - -- . .. ■ _ � co @ . � � . LL - � � ■ . � ■ _ � @ .� O O « _ ' � � U � � � � PHOTOS 16070 View of Sample Plot #4 on May 2, 2017 View westerly from central eastern portion of parcel. Wetland A depicted with flagged lath. 16070 4Nr- Fit. , View of garden in southwestern corner of parcel. Seasonal surface water identified to drain from left to right (north to south) and enter ditch along South 359th Street. Seasonal surface water exits through the garden area at the pink flag on the southern property boundary fence. Seasonal algae mat present along drainage. 16070 x71 - ;` .;. • r„ `. : •'• _gip _All /" "3� �. ��.1!!� • _ d5fi`r.... r '��' .rlt�i•�, a. �l�C�:Y.. ��_�• . APPENDIX A — 2017 Field Data 16070 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: parcels 2921049060 and 2921049091 City/County: i of F eral Wa Kin aunt Sampling Date:2 MAY 17 Applicant/Owner: State: WA. Sampling Point: SP1A Investigator(s): Habitat Technologies Section, Township, Range: sec 26 town 19N range 4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): slight slope Slope (%): 1% Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 47*16'49.1 9"N Long: 122'19'05.80"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham silt loam NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No E within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No E Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No E Remarks: mowed and managed area. plant community a good mixture of grasses and herbs. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius} 1. 2. 3, 4. SapliMIShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15R radius; 1. Poa sop. 2. Dactylis glomerata 3. Festuca rubra 4. Conium maculatum 5. T raxacum officinale 6. 7. 8. 9. 10, 11. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius] 1. 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Soec[E57 Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Mullioly by, OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = >20 yes Column Totals: (A) (B) >20 yes FACU >20 yes FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: >20 ems FAC a10 no FACU ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation E Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is :53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 100% = Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation = Total Cover Present? Yes E No ❑ % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: area of regularly management through mowing. very mixed community of grasses and herbs. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP1A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR 312 100 GL rnixed oravelly loam 16-22 10YR 3/3 GL mixed gravelly loam 'Tvoe: C=Concentration. D=Deoletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: drains moderately well and area dominated by mixed gravelly loam. no field indicators of hydric soils. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one required: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA ❑ High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Secondary Indicators 2 or more re ulred ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): dry to 22" Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): dry to 22Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: No field indicators of wetland hydrology. onsite review of 27 April 17 and 4 April 17 no free water to 22" US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Parcels 2921049 0 and 292104 1 City/County: Cay of Federal Way King County.Sampling Date:2 MAY 17 Applicant/Owner: State: WA. Sampling Point: SP2A Investigator(s): Habitat Technologies Section, Township, Range: sec 26 town 19N range 4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): slight slope Slope (%): 1% Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 47'16'49.19"N Long: 122" 19'05.80"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham silt loam NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: mowed and managed area. plant community a good mixture of grasses and herbs. sample plot at edge of wet topographic swale Sample plot is located at edge of identified wetland. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1, That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2• Total Number of Dominant 3_ Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1000I (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 151`1 radius] Prevalence Index worksheet: 1 2 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3 OBL species x 1 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius] UPL species x 5 = 1. Poa s . >20 ves Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Dact lis glornerata <10 no FACU 3. Festuca rubra <10 no FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Cirsium vul are <2 no FACU 5. Taraxacum officinale <10 no FACU ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. Ranunculus acris >20 yes FACW ® Dominance Test is >50% 7. A rostis alba <10 no FAC ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ❑ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 100% = Total Cover be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius] 1 Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation = Total Cover Present? Yes ® No ❑ % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: area of regularly management through moving. very mixed community of grasses and herbs. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 ]L Sampling Point: SP2A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) _ % Color imaisti % Tvr)e' Loci Texture Remarks 0-22 10YR 3/2 100 GL mixed gravelly loam 'Type: C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (At) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (173) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Depth (Inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: drains somewhat well and area dominated by mixed gravelly loam. no prominant field indicators of hydric soils. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one re aired: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (At) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA ❑ High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (86) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): dry to 22" Secondaa Indicators 2 or more reguiredi ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 17" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: No field indicators of wetland hydrology. Edge of topographic swale. onsite review of 27 April 17 and 4 April 17 no free water to 22" but saturated above both times US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Parcels 292104906.0. and2921049091 City/County: City of Federal Way King Counlv Sampling Date:2 MAY 17 Applicant/Owner: State: WA. Sampling Point: SP3A Investigator(s): Habitat Technologies Section, Township, Range: sec 26 town 19N rancle 4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): slight slope Slope (%): 1% Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 47*16'49.19"N Long: 122'19'05.80'%N Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham silt loam NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: mowed and managed area. plant community a good mixture of grasses and herbs. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1, That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B) SaplinolShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1 2 Total % Cover of: Multipiv by-. 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius] UPL species x 5 = 1. Poa spp, >20 yes Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Dactyjis glomerata >20 yes FACU 3. Festuca rubra >20 yes FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Cirsium vul are <2 no FACU 5. Taraxacum offirinale >20 yes FACU ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. Ranunculus acris trace no FACW ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 7. A rostis alba <10 no FAC ❑ Prevalence Index is s3.0' 8 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ❑ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 100% = Total Cover be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Wood Vine 5ira um (Plot size: 15R radiust 1 Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation = Total Cover Present? Yes ❑ No % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: area of regularly management through mowing. very mixed community of grasses and herbs. top of topographic swale. i US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP3A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moisU % Type' Loci Texture Remarks 0-3 10YR 3/3 100 I mixed roots and loam 0-22 10YR 5/1 80% 10YR 4/6 20% D M silt loam impacted by prior land actions 'Tvpe: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ® Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: drains moderately well and area dominated by silty loam. area appears to have been modified by prior grading or the placment of imported soils. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one re uired; check li that apply) Secondary Indicat rs 2 or mare r Ired ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, ❑ High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): dry to 22" Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): dry to 22" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks No field indicators of wetland hydrology. top of topographic swale. onsite review of 27 April 17 and 4 April 17 no free water to 22" US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Parcels 29210490Q and 2921049091 City/County: City of Federal Way King County Sampling Date:2 MAY 17 Applicant/Owner: State: WA. Sampling Point: 5E4A Investigator(s): Habitat Technologies Section, Township, Range: sec 26 town 19N. ran a 4F Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): plight sloe Slope (%): 1% Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 47'1 '49.19"N Long: 122*19'05.80"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Bellin ham silt loam NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes® No ❑ Remarks: mowed and managed area. plant community a good mixture of grasses and herbs. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test works et: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3, Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B) SaplirsalShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1 2. Totat % Cover of: Multiply 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius) UPL species x 5 = 1. Poa spA. trace no - Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Halcus lanatus <5 no FAC 3 Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 5 ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. Ranunculus acris 100 yes FACW ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting $ data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ❑ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) i 11 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 100% = Total Cover be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15it radius 1' Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation = Total Cover Present? Yes ® No ❑ % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: area of regularly management through mowing. plant community domianted by dense buttercup. within of topographic swale US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP4A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (masstl % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-14 10YR 2/1 100 GL mixed roots and gravelly loam 14-22 10YR 5/1 80% 10YR 4/6 20% D M GL 'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letlon, RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand G Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ® Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ® Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present): ryf e._ Depth (inches): Remarks: drains poorly. HYDROLOGY 2Location: PL=Pore Linin4, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Indicators: PrimaT Indicators minimum of one r uired: check all that apply.) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA ❑ High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): surface Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): surface Secondary Indicators (2 or more reQuired] ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: field indicators of wetland hydrology. bottom of topographic swale. onsite review of 27 April 17 and 4 April 17 also identified free water a surface with areas of shallow surface water ponding. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Panpels 2921049060 and 292104 091 City/County: Ciiiy of Federal Way King County Sampling Date:2 MAY 17 Applicant/Owner: State: WA. Sampling Point: SP5A Investigator(s): Habitat Technologies Section, Township, Range: sec 26 town 19N range 4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): slight sloe Slope (%): 1% Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 47*16'49-19"N Long: 122'19'05.80"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham silt loam NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. I 1 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes E No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes E No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes E No ❑ Remarks: mowed and managed area. plant community a good mixture of grasses and herbs. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2" Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B) Sa lip Shrub ra rn (Plot size: 15ft radius) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1 2 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius} UPL species x 5 = 1. Poa spa trace no Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Holcus lanatus <5 no FAC 3 Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Taraxacum officinale <2 no FACU 5. Conjum maculatum <2 no FAC ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. Ranunculus acris 100 yes FACW E Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is s3.0' 7 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ❑ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 100% = Total Cover be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Woody one Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius] 1" Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation = Total Cover Present? Yes E No ❑ % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: area of regWady management through mowing. plant community domianted by dense buttercup. within of topographic swale US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP5A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) Color (moist) % Tvoe, Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-22 10YR 2/1 100 GL mixed roots and gravelly loam 'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand G Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ® Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present): Type. Depth (inches): Remarks: drains poorly. HYDROLOGY 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sotls3: ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one reQuired: check all that apply ® Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA ❑ High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ® Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Seeondary Indicators (2 or more required). ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (1)(3) (LRR A) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): -10" Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Describe Rgcorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks field indicators of wetland hydrology. bottom of topographic swale. onsite review of 27 April 17 and 4 April 17 also identified free water or water table at or near the surface with areas of shallow surface water ponding. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 1 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Parcels 2921049060 and 2921049091 City/County: City of Federal Way King County —Sampling Date:2 MAY 17 Applicant/Owner: State: WA. Sampling Point: SP6A Investigator(s): HaWtat Technologies Section, Township, Range: sec 26 town 19N range 4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none) slight sloe Slope (%): 1 % Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 47" 16'49.19" N Long: 122'19'05.80"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham silt loam NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. � � I Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: mowed and managed area. plant community a good mixture of grasses and herbs with no real dominate species. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1511 radius % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 • That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: - (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius Prevalence Index worksheet: 1 2 Total % Cover of- Multiply by: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius] UPL species x 5 = 1. Poa sop. <20 no Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Dact lis glomerata <20 no FACU 3. Festuca rubra <20 no FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Conium macuiatum <20 no FAC 5. T raxacum officinaie <10 no FACU ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. Phalaris arundinacea <10 no FACW ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 7 ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ❑ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 100% = Total Cover be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius? 1' Hydrophytic 2• Vegetation = Total Cover Present? Yes ® No ❑ % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: area of regularly management through mowing. very mixed community of grasses and herbs. no real dominant species US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP6A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Sn,heal Color mais % Color (moist) % Type' Loc? Texture Remarks 0-22 10YR 3/3 100 GL mixed gravefly loam 'Tvoe: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Depth (inches). Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: drains moderately well and area dominated by mixed gravelly loam. no field indicators of hydric soils. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one required: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA ❑ High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): dry to 22" Secondary IndiCal ors_f2or more repuired� ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (133) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): dry to 22" Wetiand Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: No field indicators of wr Eland hydrology. onsite review of 27 April 17 and 4 April 17 no free water to 22" US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Prolect/Site: Parcels 2921049060 and 2921049091 City/County: City of Federal Way King County Sampling Date:2 MAY 17 Applicant/Owner: State: WA. Sampling Point: SP7A Investigator(s): Habitat Technologies Section, Township, Range: sec 26 town 19N range 4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): slight sloe Slope (%): 1% Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 47'16'49.19"N Long: 122'19'05.80'VII Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham silt loam NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks mowed and managed area. plant community a good mixture of grasses and herbs VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15ftrdius % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius] 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius} 1. Poa spa a20 no - 2. Dactylis glomerata a20 no FACU 3. Festuca rubra <20 no FAC 4. Conium maculatum 20 yes FAC 5. Taraxacum officinale <10 no FACU 6. Phalaris arundinacea a10 no FACW 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 100% = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft ra i 1. 2. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: - (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: - (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: - (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of; Muitiply tW' OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is s3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: area of regularly management through mowing. very mixed community of grasses and herbs. no real dominant species US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP7A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color fgioistl % Color (moist) % Type' Loe Texture Remarks 0-22 10YR 3/3 100 GL mixed gravelly loam 'T e: C=Concentration, 0--Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (All) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: drains moderately well and area dominated by mixed gravelly loam no field indicators of hydric soils. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Prima Indicators minimum of one required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators 2 or more re uired ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, ❑ High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 413) 4A, and 4B) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): dry to 22" Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): d tor2_ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available: Remarks: No field indicators of wetland hydrology. onsite review of 27 April 17 and 4 April 17 no free water to 22" US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Parcels 2921049060 and 2921049091 City/County: City of Federal Way King County_ Sampling Date:2 MAY 17 Applicant/Owner: State: WA Sampling Point: SP8A Investigator(s): Habitat Technoiggies Section, Township, Range: sec 26 town 19N, range 4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): grace Local relief (concave, convex, none): slight slope Slope (%): 1% Subregion (LRR). A Lat: 47*16'49.19"N Long: 122`19'05.80'W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham sill loam NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No E within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No E Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No E Remarks: mowed and managed area. plant community a good mixture of grasses and herbs VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dom inance Test worksheet: Tree Stralum (Plot size: 15f1 radius % Cover ,Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2• Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100°I (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1 2 Total % Cover of: Multiply bv: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15R radius) UPL species x 5 = 1. Poa sop. <20 na Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Dactylis olomerata <20 no FACU 3. Festuca rubra <20 no FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Conium maculatum 20 Ms FAC 5. Taraxacum officinale G00 no FACU ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. Phalaris arundinacea <10 no FACW E Dominance Test is >50% 7. Ranunculus acris 20 yes FACW ❑ Prevalence Index is s3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ❑ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 100% = Total Cover be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine g1raturn (Plot size: 15ft radius 1 Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation = Total Cover Present? Yes E No El Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: area of regularly management through mowing. very mixed community of grasses and herbs. only a few dominant species US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP8A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color moist % Tvoe' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-10 10YR 3/3 100 GL mixed aravell loam 10-22 10YR 3/3 50% GL mixed with 50% 10YR 4/3 GL 'Tvge: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): 1 vpe." Depth (inches)- Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: drains moderately well and area dominated by mixed gravelly loam. no field indicators of hydric soils HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one required, check all that a I ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA ❑ High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): dry to 22" Secondary Indicators.[? or more recluiredl ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): dry, to 22" i Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, if available: Remarks: No held indicators of wetland hydrology. onsite review of 27 April 17 and 4 April 17 with no free water to 22" US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Parcefs 2921049060 and 2921 9091 City/County: City of Federal Way King Count Sampling Date:2 MAY 17 Applicant/Owner: State: WA. Sampling Point: SP9A Investigator(s): Habitat Technologies Section, Township, Range: sec 26 town 19N ran(le 4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): slight slope _ Slope (%): 1% Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 47'16'49.19"N Long: 122'19'05.80"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham silt loam NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: mowed and managed area. plant community dominated by buttercup with a mixture of grasses and herbs VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius) % v r Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B) SaplinalShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius Prevalence Index worksheet: 1 2 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius] UPL species x 5 = 1. Poa s . trace no - Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Holcus lanatus trace no FAC 3. Festuca rubra trace no FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = 4 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5 ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6 ® Dominance Test is >50% 7. Ranunculus acris 100 Yes FACW ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ❑ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 100% = Total Cover be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius] 1' Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation = Total Cover Present? Yes ® No ❑ % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: area of regularly management through mowing. very mixed community of grasses and herbs. only a few dominant species US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP9A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Lod Texture Remarks 0-22 10YR 211 100 GL 'Tvpe: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (All) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ® Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: drains poorly with field indicators of hydric soils. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one required: check all that a I ® Surface Water (All) ® Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA ® High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ® Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): surface Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): surface Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): surface Secondary Indicators 2 or more re uired ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Describe Retarded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: field indicators of wetland hydrology. onsite review of 27 April 17 and 4 Aprii i7 with free water at surface with shallow pockets of ponded water. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Parcels 2921049060 and 292t04 091 City/County: City of Federal Way King County Sampling Date:2 MAY 17 Applicant/Owner: State: WA. Sampling Point: SP14A Investigator(s): Habitat Technologies Section, Township, Range: sec 26, town 19N. range 4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): slight slope Slope (%): 1% Subregion (LRR) A Lat: 47'1649.19"N Long: 122'19'05.80"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham silt loam NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. � � I Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑ Hydric Soil Present? Yes E No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes E No ❑ Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes E No ❑ Remarks: old garden area. plant community dominated by buttercup with a mixture of grasses and herbs VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheets Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius] % Cover ies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: t (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B) Saplinq)Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius] Prevalence Indexworksheet: 1 2 Total % Cover of: _ Multiply W:: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius UPL species x 5 = 1. Poa spy. trace no - Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Holcus lanatus trace no FAC 3. Festuca r_ubra trace no FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 5 ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6 E Dominance Test is >50% 7. Ranunculus acris 100 yes FACW ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ❑ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 100% = Total Cover be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Woad Vine Vatum (Plot size:l5ftradiusf 1' Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation = Total Cover Present? Yes E No ❑ % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: narrow swale in old garden area. very mixed community of grasses and herbs. only a few dominant species US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP14A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-22 10YR 2/1 100 GL mixed 1b pdcr Qarden_actions 'Tvpe: C=Concentration. D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (Al0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ® Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Depth (inches): Remarks: drains poorly with field indicators of hydric soils. HYDROLOGY Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that ao I ) ® Surface Water (Al) ® Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA ® High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 46) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ® Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) SecondaN Indicators f2 or more re uired ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) FIClu wuawl vauui ice. Surface Water Present? Yes ® No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): -,1p" Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes caplliary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available indicators of wetland hydrology. onsite review of 27 April 17 and 4 April 17 with free water near surface with shallow pockets of ponded water US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Parcels 2921049060 and 2921049091 City/County: City of Federal Way King Counjy Sampling Date:2 MAY 17 Applicant/Owner: State: WA. Sampling Point: SP15A Investigator(s). Habitat Technologies Section, Township, Range: sec 26. town 19N. range 4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): slight sloe Slope (%): 1% Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 47*16'49.19"N Long: 122*19'05.80"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Bellin ham silt loam NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No E within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No E Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No E Remarks: old garden area. plant community dominated by buttercup with a mixture of grasses and herbs, drains moderately well VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15ft ram) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2• Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B) SaolinglShrub_Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius] Prevalence Indexworksheet: 1 2 Total % Cover of- Multiply by: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius] UPL species x 5 = 1. Poa spp, r5 no - Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Holcus lanatus <5 no FAC 3. Festuca rubra <5 no FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Phalaris arundinacea 20 eks FACW 5. Taraxicum officinale a5 no FACU ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. Rumex Cris us e5 no FAC E Dominance Test is >50% 7. Ranunculus acris 60 yes FACW ❑ Prevalence Index is s3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ❑ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 100% = Total Cover be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius] 1' Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation = Total Cover Present? Yes E No ❑ % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: adjacent to narrow swale in old garden area. very mixed community of grasses and herbs. only a few dominant species US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP15A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color fmoist) % Tvpe' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-22 10YR 3/2 100 GL mixed ri r garden actions 'Tvpe C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: drains somewhat well and no prominant field indicators of hydric soils. HYDROLOGY Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ED Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required, check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA ❑ High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131) (LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): -20" Seconds ry Indicators 2 or more reg uired ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): -15" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Data (stream gauge, monitoring vvell, aerie( photos, previous inspections), Remarks: no prominant field indicators of wetland hydrology. onsite review of 27 April 17 and 4 April 17 with free water below -16 inches US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Parcels 2921049060 arid 2921049091 City/County: City of F d ral Way Kinq County Sampling Date:2 MAY 17 Applicant/Owner: State: WA. Sampling Point: SP20A Investigator(s): Habitat Technologies Section, Township, Range: sec 26, town 19N. range 4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): slight sloe Slope (%): 1% Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 47*16'49.19" N Long: 122' 19'05.80'VV Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham silt loam NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) No ❑ SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: centerline of constructed roadside ditch to east and upslope of ditch culvert inlet. drains moderately well VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius !A QQver Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B) SaplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15tt radius] Prevalence Index worksheet: 1 2 Total % Cover of: Multiply bv: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb 5traturrt (Plot size: 15fl radio UPL species x 5 = 1. Poa spp. trace no - Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Holcus lanatus trace no FAC 3. Festuca rubra trace no FAC Prevalence Index = B/A= Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Phalaris arundina e 20 yes FACW 5. Taraxicum officinale <5 no FACU ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. Rum x crisious <5 no FAC ® Dominance Test is >50% 7. Ranunculus acris 20 yes FACW ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 8. Conium maculatum 20 yes FAC ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. Solanum dulcamara 30 yes FAC ❑ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 100% = Total Cover be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius] 1. Hydrophytic 2• Vegetation = Total Cover Present? Yes ® No ElBare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: roadside ditch upslope of drain culvert. very mixed community of grasses and herbs US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP20A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color m is % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-22 10YR 3/2 & 3/3 100 GL mixed soils 'Tvpe: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present) Depth (inches):, Remarks: drains somewhat well and no prominant field indicators of hydric soils. HYDROLOGY Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one re uired: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA ❑ High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): dry to -22" Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): dry to -22" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: no prominant field indicators of wetland hydrology. onsite review of 27 April 17 and 4 April 17 with no free water above -16 inches US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Parcefs 2921049060 and 292104 091 City/County: City of Federal Wav King County Sampling Date:2 MAY 17 Applicant/Owner: State: WA. Sampling Point: SP21A Investigator(s): Habitat Technologies Section, Township, Range: sec 26 tawn 19N. range 4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace. Local relief (concave, convex, none): slight sloe Slope (%): 1% Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 47.16'49.19"N Long: 122'19'05.80"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham silt loam NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: centerline of constructed roadside ditch to west and downslope of ditch culvert inlet. drains somewnat poorly VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 152 radius 1. 2. 3. 4. Sa lin /Shrub Stratum (Ptot size: 15ft radio 1. 2. 3, 4. 5, Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius] 1. Poa spp. 2. Holcus lanatus 3. Festuca rubra 4. Phalaris arundinacea 5. Taraxicum officinale 6. Rumex Cris us 7. Ranunculus acris 8. Conium macuiatum 9. Sol gum dulcamara 10. 11. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius} 1. 4 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover ecies? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of Multiply bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = = Total Cover UPL species x 5 = trace no - Column Totals: (A) (B) trace no FAC trace no FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 40 yes FACW <5 no FACU ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation <5 no FAC El Dominance Test is >50% 20 yes FACW ❑ Prevalence Index is s3.0' 20 10 yes no FAC FAC ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 100% = Total Cover J Hydrophytic Ij Vegetation = Total Cover Present? Yes ® No ❑ % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: roadside ditch downslope of drain culvert. very mixed community of grasses and herbs. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP21A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % polar (maist] % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-14 10YR 2/2 100 GL mixed soils 14-22 10YR 2/2 95% 10YR 4/6 5% D M yl mixed soils 'Tvoe: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2t.ocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (All) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ® Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): iypG:_ Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: drains somewhat poorly and exhibites prominant field indicators of hydric soils. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one reouired: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ® Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except MLRA ® High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Water Marks (131) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ® Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ® Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): -12" Seca ndary Indicators. (2 or more required] ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): -5' Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), Remarks: prominant field indicators of wetland hydrology. onsite review of 27 April 17 and 4 April 17 with free water above -12 inches. sample plot below level of drain associated with culvert leading southward under 3591' US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 APPENDIX B — Revised Wetland Rating Worksheet 16070 PEMCx The map features are apprommale and are intended duly to provide an Indication of said feature. Additional areas that have not been mapped may be present. This Is not a survey. The orthophotos and other data may not align. PLerca County and Habilal Technologies assume no Ika6l31ty for vanaliorts ascenalned tyy aclual survey. AEI data Is expressly p[(riidad AS IS and WTH ALL FAULTS. Pierce County and habitat Technologies make no warranty of Atness for a parUWlar purpose. Map Legend O Wetland A GPS Tax Parcels - King County Third Party - 2009 - USDA- NAIP (1m) Ortho Highlighted Tax Parcels p Tax Parcels Roads Roads - King County of Interstate r. Limited Access State Routes �•f Other State Routes Ramps Major Arterial Collector Local Access Unknown I:i N 1'll-1 i Figure W1 0 50 100 ft. A Habitat Technologies I 17/5/16 9:56 AM The map features are epprommate and are intended only to provide an rndicalion of said feature. Additional areas That have not helm mapped may be present This is not a survey The CAhophotos and other dala may not align, Prarce County and Habitat Technologies assume no G&bllily for van ations; ascertalned by actual survey. All data is expressly povided AS IS &M WTH ALL FAULTS P{erca Technologies no aty and Habitat make warranty of fitness for a particular purpose Map Legend Wetland A GPS Tax Parcels - King County Third Party - 2009 - USDA- NAIP (1m) Ortho Highlighted Tax Parcels p Tax Parcels Roads Roads - King County Interstate Limited Access State Routes Rf Other State Routes Ramps Major Arterial Collector Local Access Unknown • pi Seasonally Saturated -t lly SeasonaPS Flooded ,a r OL Wk Figure W2 _ ° 50 100ft. A Habitat Technologies 7/5/16 9:58 AM ti 01 - . --tr,& : . ■ Af Contributing Basin Figure W3 Habitat Technologies J ' I The map features are approximate and are intended erily to provide an Indlcahon of said feature Additiwal areas that have ndl been mapped may de present. This Is not a survey. The odhopholas and olher data may not align. Pierce County and Habitat ' Teenndlogies assume no liatefrty fdr vafiafiona aseartaIned by acluaI survey. A 1 data IS expressly provided AS IS and MATH ALL FAULTS. Pierce County and Habital Tschndidgiea malre no warranty of fitness for a particular purpose Map Legend Contours - 5 ft (LIDAR) - i, King County p Wetland A GPS El Tax Parcels - King County Third Party - 2009 - USDA- NAIP (1m) Ortho Highlighted Tax Parcels CD Tax Parcels Roads Roads - King County 40 lntarstate pj Limitod ACCO55 State Routes ,7 Cii w State Routes Ramps Major Artedal Collector Local Access Unknown 0 100 200 ft. 7/5/16 10:04 AM g A F C c 5;-E y o� £ c 0- C coRD a) a 1341 �0a 410 4 D N Z N m m 7 V m oo ❑ in r E o ��`v m H [Q ❑5= mOo91 oE ���� c Q o= [O 4) N(p o 9 Z � R AVF1RZ N 27 V S nV laJ.L7 - uµi �jk O:S 3l9 M 1 rn S Al N rh vi e• rn i S � ZZ rn a h x � ` Rli OT 3-9 `�" 4 •ice �i L 5 � S � •~+ N S r11+ z crt{y C�e1T.5 � N yr Hy 4 S � • LiE e li S.v +� f' C 0 U a� i N a n n r6 IL C O C OE +� c U, C C . - 0 LJ c c E G L i O U a) v O � 0. ro C > a) ro E cu v > t 0 3 L a `I E N C EA 6 L � Y m r0 Q1 � a L W C O 0 - u Y U C� C N L L O w L C O W J Lc LGL > r O L 4T 0 inN N N o to T c U 3 a� o 'o w .E a O X r0 f0 E 0 0 F- UJ 7 C ar E tn W QJ N 1n a A (a o o r0 J Ln (7 It (7 V C7 J 7^ C^ C^ C 0 > N in 1f' > > -0 O p C p C pp C C O 10 a Y m O 0 m O %D m O C C L a a a° '0 a a � a c w rz to w � m w w o c U C T >' o E U Q) �o L (Uo E 0 ac) > C E > n a > > O rp O O ,E J U O O a m CL C a ro 0 ai a a a =._ a= a F-'0 a a M C40 C C U 01 E X E E x o cu o o o a w - 10- fa > u o > u �, U Ln :5 U N U E XO U al (n U 1i li E Z m L tn V C QJ L N N Y E cu m � 1 U u U 3 V) a, Laj L > E ro U x m U U Z n 0 n 0 0 l0 rn rLa no ro o U o C7 (7 c ^ c c m o (a o > ", o o c o c o o c o ❑ ❑ M M ❑ M c C c O O a a O E a az o a w w w a w C E -0 .0 a > -0 E a) -0 _0 _0 a) a) N Q a) a) N Q j 0 E E O O O L N � c d a d c d N O �0 �0 d d CL c a m = Q Q Q Q Q= a a1 L N L L N N i L c ro aj x v ui E a aj 0 O E Z ? y ++ O 7 'O w ra fu 2� a) a1 [n H L = a w o 10 0 o m c� L U v O i, E p _ �o CL E v O E O a 3 J u Q L x Q m ❑ I lL 9 � Y � a) 7 Y ?, c a) O E 'O a) v O E �j Q) = U � L Y a) to v U Y c� Y H m ,0, - E v m L a°Ji E E CU -0v-0 y L U L m a) U m U ¢ U Q 3 L g , a U N C ai () O U L u c C C O � O a p� E� N U � 2 ro L :3 � a v Ln Lo L 0- Ln O L a fo P- L L 01 a O U O 17 fO 3 u U a) 3 3 3 o_ L v a� Ln a O7 O O U w 0 0 c a� E 41 fo O_ m i Ln c O 0 N Cl of N C 0 a) L O C fu 7 (0 O O O L u a 01 m T rp O O U Wetland name or number A - revised to incorporate 2017 assessment period RATING SUMMARY - Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): Parcel 29210490060 Date of site visit: 2 MAY 17 Rated by Habitat Technologies Trained by Ecology? x Yes No Date of training 2014 HGM Class used for rating De sessional/Sloe Wetland has multiple HGM classes? _YxN NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map King County GIS OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY 3 (based on functions x or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 x Category III — Total score = 16 - 19 Category IV — Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION i Improving I Hydrologic Habitat Water Qualitv i Circle the appropriate ratings ,ite Potential H M FqHD M L H M❑ L andscape Potential H MQ L H ® L H M Fq Value �� M L H M❑ L 17 M L TOTAL core Based on 6 7 6 19 tatings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above x Wetland Raring System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3=L,L,L 1 Wetland name or number A Maps and figures required to answer questions correctly for Western Washington De ressional Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes D 1.3, H 1.1, H 1.4 W1 Hydroperiods D 1.4, H 1.2 W2 Location of outlet (can be added to map of hydroperiods) D 1.1, D 4.1 W2 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another figure) D 2.2, D 5.2 W2 Map of the contributing basin D 4.3, D 5.3 W3 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 W4 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) D 3.1, D 3.2 W5 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) D 3.3 W6 Riverine Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes H 1.1, H 1.4 � Hydroperiods H 1.2 Ponded depressions R 1.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to anotherfigure) R 2.4 Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants R 1.2, R 4.2 Width of unit vs. width of stream (can be added to anotherfigure) R 4.1 N/A Map of the contributing basin R 2.2, R 2.3, R 5.2 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) R 3.1 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) R 3.2, R 3.3 Lake Fringe Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin.plant classes L 1.1, L 4.1, H 1.1, H 1.4 A Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants L 1.2 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another figure) L 2.2 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 N/A L 3.1, L 3.2 L 3.3 Slope Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes H 1.1, H 1.4 Hydroperiods H 1.2 Plant cover of dense trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants S 1.3 Plant cover of dense, rigid trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants (can be added to figure above) S 4.1 N/A Boundary of 150 ft buffer (can be added to another figure) S 2.1, S 5.1 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) S 3.1, S 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) S 3.3 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number A HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? NO -go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. 0 - go to YES - The wetland class is Flats Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at any time of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). NO -go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope (slope can be verygradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. NO- goto5 YES - The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number A NO - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO-goto7 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO- oto8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM class to use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE If you are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number A DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. 2 points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points =1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface (or duff laver] is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 0 D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > % of area most of wetland mowed lawn points = 3 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points =1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal p_o_ndinp or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 4 2 Area seasonally ponded is > X total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < X total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above 1 5 Rating of Site Potential If score is:�12-16 = H _6-11= M X 0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 0 D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 1 D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes = 1 No = 0 1 D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source Yes = 1 No = 0 0 Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above 2 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 or 4 = H X 1 or 2 = M , 0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 1 D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 1 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above 2 4 Rating of Value If score is:X 2-4 = H _1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number A DEPRESSI0NAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points =1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage during wet periods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet excavated pored points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet >3 ft deep points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 7 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage_ in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 3 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above 12 Rating of Site Potential If score is: X _12-16 = H _6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 0 D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 1 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes =1 No = 0 0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above 1 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 = H x 1 or 2 = M �0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): ■ Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points =1 1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points =1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? 0 Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above 1 Rating of Value If score is: _2-4 = H X 1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page M Wetland name or number A These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of X ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 X Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 2 _Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points =1 X Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if.• X The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). xPermanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 X Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 2 _Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 X Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftz. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name 2 the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 - 19 species points = 1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. (: 0 ) (*) ( 4L) None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number A H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. _Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree 1 slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) X At least X ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) _Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above 8 Rating of Site Potential If score is:—_15-18 = H X 7-14 = M _0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat 5 + [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2J 5 = 10 % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 1 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat 25+ N moderate and low intensity land uses)/21 15= 40 % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 1 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) (-2) <_ 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above 0 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:-4-6 = H _1-3 = M X < 1= L H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? Record the rating on the first page H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 X It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1 Site does not meet anv of the criteria above Rating of Value If score is: X 2 = H _1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 ints = 0 RAF Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number A WDFW Priority Habitats Priority habitats listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. littp://wdfw.wa.gov/pmhlications/QO 1 S w 00 .. df or access the list from here: httl2:1/wdfw.wag.ov/conservalion (phs/list/) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE. This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). X — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and fortis on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: Old-Uowth west -of Cascade Gres - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 - see web link above). X Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161 - see web link above). X — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. X — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 0 �> W ea ,� 4MW 29 .-_..C* Z a a eC 0 Na0i4�r CITY OF Way Fedel REVISED JUNE 2015 BOUNDARY .LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 18-102925-00-SU CITY OF FEDERAL WAY KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AUTHORIZATION THIS BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT IS MADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE OWNERS OF THE AFFECTED PROPERTIES. c It PAVLO SOKALKSYYe--- F VIKTORIYA SOKALSKA Date State of Washington County of �F�I2R_C'Ci 1 ss. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _��VI����I S1A 1J signed this instrument and ackno ledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 4Q�•''s�6n'Fx,,�if 4�.op S,r'•, Signature of I ., ooiP .. Notary Public /e r•-:t,1 �� \{j ' x Printed name PVbN `tea: Dated I I lei My appointment expires of ....�i State of Washington County of shn ) t) rC� ) ss. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that VltefibrI1-4�-a--, �C�1 �StAifA signed this instrument- and acknowledged it o be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument, rrr1/,.4!' ?,•�� �p,(iY Signature of i Z = Notary Public Printed na ! LC91127L& j Dated �0%'•0;1,4=Ag��� My appointment expires ir/iri'E10� RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE ............ filed for record this... ....day of, .?k).,20.r'4..at\\.1.M . in book. ,?���.o . ttrat page.16)..at the request of t ,11 di.Zg� Supt. of Records APPROVALS: KING GO 41, Y CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPAR E OF ASSESSMENTS Exa ed and ❑ ak' roved this pp day of 2fl� Examined andz 01ffirovthis � day of FEgRUARY 20ft ADE, UTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Assessor 19 Examined and approved this 3 t day of 20 —1 Deputy Assessor �., z ,oy ��� o, UNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Account Number ORIGINAL PARCELS PARCEL A: THE EAST 123,5 FEET OF THE WEST 247 FEET OF THE EAST 1291.5 FEET OF PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, LYING NORTH OF NORTH NEIL ROAD "NOW SOUTH 359TH STREET" IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT NORTH 00'14'15' WEST 391.15 FEET FROM THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 28 AND 29 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 89'35'15" WEST 1044.5 FEET, ALONG THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF NEIL COUNTY .ROAD (SOUTH 359TH STREET), AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2616092, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00'14'15" WEST 283.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'35'15" WEST TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID NEIL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 89'35'15" EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID ROAD TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 123.5 FEET THEREOF. AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON, SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AND RESTRICTIONS 1-2. NOT SURVEY RELATED 3. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR .FILLS UPON SAID 'REMISES AS GRANTED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2616092. 4. NOT SURVEY RELATED 5. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDING INFORMATION: MAY 06, 1969 FOR: 6506182, ILLEGIBLE DEED 6. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDING INFORMATION:8508200804 IN FAVOR OF: LAKEHAVEN SEWER DISTRICT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR: SEWER MAINS WITH THE NECESSARY APPURTENANCES , SHOWN HEREON 7. BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: JOHN A. VERMEULEN AND MARY E. VERMEULEN AND: PARK 16, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDING INFORMATION: 20140530002015, SHOWN HEREON 8. CONDITIONS, NOTES, EASEMENTS, PROVISIONS AND/OR ENCROACHMENTS CONTAINED OR DELINEATED ON THE FACE OF THE SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20140414900001. 9. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDING INFORMATION:20180919000678 FOR: A NON—EXCLUSIVE PERPETUAL EASEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF UTILITIES AS WELL AS FOR ACCESS AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, OVER AND ACROSS THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS THE ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT. LAND.. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE This 'Boundary Line Adjustment correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the appropriatele and city statute and ordinance in DECEMBE 01 . t 2 N - Ict Seth D. are, PLS Certificate No. 38985 RECORDING NO. VOL./PAGE SCALE: N/A PORTION OF SE 1 /4 of NE 1 /4, SECTION 29 TWP. 21 N,, R. 4 E., W.M. REVISED PARCELS PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP, 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT ' A POINT NORTH 01'21'39' WEST 361.14 FEET FROM THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 28 AND 29 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 88'56'18" WEST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 359TH STREET 1044.51 FEET, THENCE NORTH 01'21'39" EAST ,30.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID SOUTH 359TH STREET; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 01'21'39" EAST 140.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 01'21'39" EAST 140.12 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 88'31'33" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 267.32 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 01'30'18" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 141.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88'43'56" EAST 267.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT NORTH 01'21'39' WEST 361.14 FEET FROM THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 28 AND 29 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 88'56'18" WEST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 359TH STREET 1044.51 FEET, THENCE NORTH 01 °21'39" EAST 30.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID SOUTH 359TH STREET AND "THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 01'21'39" EAST 140.12 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88'43'56" WEST 267.67 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 01'30'18" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 141.08 FEET TO SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SOUTH 359TH STREET; THENCE SOUTH 88'56'18" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN 268.03 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE- WRTHEAST-QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. 19_ 20 20 21 p ,,., PARCEL NO. 2921049060 30 29 2.9 28 ADDRESS: NOT ASSIGNED a SITE z < S 359TH ST s i- _ J .. _.__ _ co Q� 30. 29 29 2g 31 32 VICINITY MAP 72133 1 "=2000' Pi\18066\Dwg\18066-SV-BLA,dwg 5/31/2018 114440 AM PDT Co A 5.,) ll VC, C/Yll ENaINEER/NG & SIARYEYAW Bus: 253 848-4282 429 29TH STREET NE, SUITE D Fag: M3 848-4278 PUYALLUP, WA 98372 ceservices®cesnwine.com PARCEL NO. 2921049091 ADDRESS: NOT ASSIGNED INDEX: SE 1 /4 OF THE NE 1 /4, SEC. 29, TWP 21 N., R. 4 E., W.M. BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR PAVLO SOKALSKYY DATE JOB NO. DRAWN BY: M JC 12 /18 /2018 18066 CHECKED BY: SDO SHEET 1 of 2 PARCEL A 2921049091 . 34,664 SQUARE FEET OR 0.80 ACRES (ORIGINAL) 37,609 SQUARE FEET OR 0.86 ACRES (NEW) PARCEL B 2921049060 40,605 SQUARE FEET OR 0.93 ACRES (ORIGINAL) 37,660 SQUARE FEET OR 0.86 ACRES (NEW) 34,157 SQUARE FEET OR 0.78 ACRES (NET, LESS EASEMENT) ACCESS/UTILITY EASEMENT / 3,503 SQUARE FEET OR 0.08 ACRES CATEGORY 2 2921049107 WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPERTY LINE PER BLA AFN 20140530002015 `N$8°31'33"W 0�4' 4 WIRE FENCE i267.32' 4' WIRE FENCE `'., N. LINE, N. 1 /2, S. 1 /2, SE 1 /4, NE 1 /4 143.82' 1 123.50' RECORDING NO. VOL./PAGE SCALE: 1 inch = 40 ft. 40' 20' 0 40' 80' PORTION OF SE 1 /4 of NE 1 /4, SECTION 29 TWP. 21 N°, R. 4 E., W.M. 20 21 MONUMENT IN CASE BRASS DISK WITH 'X' 29 128 DOWN 0.9' 1 5' SEWER EASEMENT PER AFN 8508200804 I 0,8, ( w \ I z \ ~ 0 0 \ \ _ I CATEGORY :2 --� \ PARCEL A CATEGORY 1 WETLAND BUFFER o X WETLAND BOUNDARY .` \\\ 2921049091 j 225' WETLAND BUFFER c'i> o� ``� (PPROXfMAT } w \ r 7 A E Ly o J., c� 0 5' CRITICAL AREA BSBL 1 i CATEGORY 2 Q N +` WETLAND PER I cck. N �19Ci"CRITICAL AREAS °a f REPORT ATE'. cv \ 2921049089 1 J NEW LOT LINE N88 43'56" Vii° NEW LOT LI NE NE 2921049006 5' WOOD FENCE { / k• I I' t �., GARDEN 1 `':. of BOX I CATEGORY 2�� --11 3'.._. WETLAND BOUNDARY \ j z w (' ATEGORY 2 WETLAND BUF R _ cS j, w C 165' WETLAND BUFFER z !1 ^ oco�n W cfl ��cn 10 c? PARCEL B ( Q !,': (APPROXIMATE) U w 2921049060 cV z ( M LLI caCuI ;' ! W Oui W Ck zATEG R O o - UNDER 0 cU RIM 189. 4 _ , Q IE 186.24 12" ADS S. u> in j 0 / Cn IE 186.39 8" PVC NW. Ld z _ EASEMENT AFN 20180919000678 / I L�j IE 187.54 4" CPEP E. \ I / ! > 5' WOOD FENCE 'ATE 1, Of cp i f fcq 5�.tJpp FENCE x ! S 268.03' �00 / CO S0130'18"W 144 53' SSMH 30.fl0'D_"_.� Z23.50' 5' WOOD FENCE RIM 210.00 IE CTR CHANNEL 200.05 `MW / a 15' PVC W_ ----SS— -- N$856'18"W 26811" 24" PVC E. CULVERT Z, Q-Q IE 185.54 12" ADS N. N01'21'39'E N88`56'18"W S. 359TH ST. 30..00' 1044.51'(C) 1044.5'(D) IE CTR CHANNEL 177.24 12" PVC N. _ — LEGEND 15" PVC E. & W. (M) MEASURED DISTANCE (D) DEED DISTANCE (C) CALCULATED REFERENCES (R-1) REFERENCE SURVEY ❑ STORM CATCH BASIN (R-1) THE PLAT OF NINE FIRS FILED UNDER RECORDING n STORM CULVERT NUMBER 8208240565. m WATER VALVE (R-2) RECORD OF SURVEY FILED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER FIRE HYDRANT 20080909900013. Q SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE E�R TELEPHONE RISER A-1 WETLAND FLAG Q BOLLARD C., . • lw "c. MW MONITOR WELL ('/,I Z E)V4911 EEWI/VG df SZ1,A?V "Y1A X FENCE (AS NOTED) --'77- EDGE OF PAVEMENT Bus: .253 848--4202 - SD STORM DRAIN LINE 429 29TH STREET NE, SUITE D Fax: (253) 848-4278 SS SANITARY SEWER LINE PUYALLUP, WA 98372 ceservices@cesuwine.com ci J Le.l S r �I BASIS OF BEARINGS NAD 83-2011 (EPOCH 2O10.00), WASHINGTON STATE PLANE, NORTH ZONE, (PER THE WASHINGTON STATE REFERENCE NETWORK). VERTICAL DATUM NGVD 29, TO CONVERT NAVD88 SUBTRACT 3.54 FEET TO GET NGVD 29 PER NOAA VERTCON. METHODS & EQUIPMENT THIS SURVEY COMPLIES WITH ALL STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES OF THE "SURVEY RECORDING ACT", CHAPTER 58.09 RCW AND 332.130 WAC METHOD: FIELD TRAVERSE AND GPS OBSERVATIONS IN MAY, 2018. EQUIPMENT USED: FOCUS 30 TOTAL STATION AND TRIMBLE R8 GPS. ALL INSTRUMENTS UTILIZED DURING THE COURSE OF THIS SURVEY ARE MAINTAINED IN CONFORMANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1 FOOT. WETLAND FLAGS WERE SET BY HABITAT TECHNOLOGIES IN "ENVIRONMENTALLY" CRITICAL AREAS ASSESSMENT DATED 6/13/2016. APPROVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2017. WETLAND DELINEATIONS SHALL BE VALID FOR FIVE YEARS; AT SUCH DATE THE CITY SHALL DETERMINE WHETHER A REVISION OR ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENT IS NECESSARY. ZONING DESIGNATION: RS 15.0= 1 DWELLING UNIT PER 15,000 SQUARE FEET ALL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO FWRC 19.145.160 'BUILDING SETBACKS', AND FWRC 19.145.180 'CRITICAL AREA MARKERS, SIGNS, AND FENCES'. THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENCUMBERED BY A CATEGORY 11 WETLAND ON -SITE WITH A 165 FOOT BUFFER AND A CATEGORY I WETLAND ON-- SITE WITH A 225 FOOT BUFFER. M �- I MONUMENT IN CASE 29 28 BRASS DISK WITH P.M. DOWN 1.8' BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR PAVLO SOKALSKYY DRAWN BY: MJC DATE 12/18/2018 JOB N0.18066 CHECKED BY: SDO I SCALE 1 40' ISHEET 2 OF 2 REVISED JUNE 20 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 18-102925-00-SU CITY OF FEDERAL WAY KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AUTHORIZATION THIS BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT IS MADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE OWNERS OF THE AFFECTED PROPERTIES. PAVLO SOKALKSYY VIKTORIYA SOKALSKA Date Date State of Washington ) ss. County of ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Signature of Notary Public Printed name Dated My appointment expires State of Washington ) ) ss. County of ) l certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Signature of Notary Public Printed name Dated My appointment expires RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE .................... filed for record this ........... day of .......... 20....... at ...... M in book .......... of ........ at page......... at the request of ................................. ....................................... Mgr. Supt. of Records APPROVALS: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Examined and approved this day of 20 DEPUTYPUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Examined and approved this day of 20_ KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS Examined and approved this day of 20� Assessor Deputy Assessor COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Account Number ORIGINAL PARCELS PARCEL A: THE EAST 123.5 FEET OF THE WEST 247 FEET OF THE EAST 1291.5 FEET OF PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, LYING NORTH OF NORTH NEIL ROAD "NOW SOUTH 359TH STREET" IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT NORTH 00.14'15' WEST 391.15 FEET FROM THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 28 AND 29 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 89`35'15" WEST 1044.5 FEET, ALONG THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF NEIL COUNTY ROAD (SOUTH 359TH STREET), AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2616092, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00.14'15" WEST 283.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°35'15" WEST TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID NEIL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 89'35'15" EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID ROAD TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 123.5 FEET THEREOF. AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AND RESTRICTIONS 1. NOT SURVEY RELATED 2. NOT SURVEY RELATED 3. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON SAID PREMISES AS GRANTED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2616092. 4. NOT SURVEY RELATED 5. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDING INFORMATION: MAY 06, 1969 FOR: 6506182, ILLEGIBLE DEED 6. -EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDING INFORMATION:8508200804 IN FAVOR OF: LAKEHAVEN SEWER DISTRICT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR: SEWER MAINS WITH THE NECESSARY APPURTENANCES , SHOWN HEREON 7. BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: JOHN A. VERMEULEN AND MARY E. VERMEUL.EN AND: PARK 16, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDING INFORMATION: 20140530002015, SHOWN HEREON RECORDING NO. SCALE N/A VOL./PAGE PORTION OF SE 1 /4 of NE 1 /4, SECTION 29 TWP. 21 N., R. 4 E., W.M. REVISED PARCELS PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT NORTH 01'21'39' WEST 361.14 FEET FROM THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 28 AND 29 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 88°56'18" WEST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 359TH STREET 1044.51 FEET, THENCE NORTH 01'21'39" EAST 30.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID SOUTH 359TH STREET AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 01°21'39" EAST 140.12 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88'43'56" WEST 267,67 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE SOUTH 01.30'18" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 141.08 FEET TO SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SOUTH 359TH STREET; THENCE SOUTH 88.56'18" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN 268.03 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT NORTH 01.21'39' WEST 361.14 FEET FROM THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 28 AND 29 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 88'56'18- WEST ALONG THE CEN-ERLINE OF SOUTH 359TH STREET 1044.51 FEET, THENCE NORTH 01.21'39" EAST 30.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID SOUTH 359TH STREET; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 01.21'39" EAST 140.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 01.21'39" EAST 140.12 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 88.31'33" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 267.32 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 01 °30'18" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 141.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88.43'56" EAST 267.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. 19 20 20 29 PARCEL NO. 2921049060 30 29 29 28 ADDRESS: NOT ASSIGNED 8. CONDITIONS, NOTES, EASEMENTS, PROVISIONS AND/OR ENCROACHMENTS CONTAINED 30 29 OR DELINEATED ON THE FACE OF THE SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20140414900001. 31 32 p S aN'I A i✓�_8'T LZoLfi �IN EASC T i In(ZuDiA'G'Tevzrn5 9-A10V1g000 (9 SI N 77- 0 ocopv N (a (ry Q. vY�ATi o N. � I� o `� 0 D P+\18066\Dwg\18066-SV-BLA.dwg 5/31/2018 1144110 AM PDT LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE This Boundary Line Adjustment correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the appropriate stat and city statute and ordinance in July, 2018. Seth D. O'Hare, PLS Certificate No. 38985 co C//�/L ENG/VEER/N!s &SURVEY/Nt, Bus: 253 848-4282 429 29TH STREET NE, SUITE D Fag: (253 848-4278 PUYALLUP, WA 98372 ceservices®cesnwinc.com I7 Dept. SITE w S 359TH ST r e u4 o-1 :1P1 V PLANNIN �Ity of Federal Wa ` Community Dey �i� PARCEL NO. 2921049091 ADDRESS: NOT ASSIGNED CINITY Wa --tea!« INDEX: SE 1/4 OF THE NE Dad 00 (� 1 /4, SEC. 29, TWP 21 N., • ���.,p�p /�v Con kOA R. 4 E., W.M. �1 J 9-. C.C.C. W 0 a- O CITY OF Federdl REVISED JUNE 2015 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 18-102925-00-SU CITY OF FEDERAL WAY KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, • 40 CATEGORY 2 WETLAND BOUNC 0� 1:3' •� 4' :WIRE FENCE N88'31'3; k C • • �i I 143.82° r Nv 60 �� �(� w z J Q� �SRaa q a,,k �� CV 00 2921049006 IE 186.24 12" ADS S. IE 186.39 8" PVC NW. IE 187.54 4" CPEP E. SSMH RIM 189.48 IE CTR CHANNEL 177.24 12" PVC N. 15" P VC E. & W. AP OVED PLANKING City of Federal Way Dept. of Community Deve opment Permit # S'��00 -Su By Date '421 12.pdc-o J twxX 0 6 01.0& i.rp di -,,A 2921049107 TY LINE PER BLA AFN 20140530002015 n/n' n a' S. 359TH ST. N. LINE, N. 1 /2, S. 1 /2, SE 1 /4, NE 1 /4 225' WETLAND BUFFER 5' CRITICAL AREA BSBL PARCEL 29210490 34,664 SQUARE FEET OR 0.80 ACRES (ORIGINAL) 37,609 SQUARE FEET OR 0.86 ACRES (NEW) PARCEL 29210490 40,605 SQUARE FEET 0.93 ACRES (ORIGINAL). 37,660 SQUARE FEET R 0.86 ACRES (NEW) ( J QUARE FEET R) 0.78 ACRES (NET, LESS EASEMENT) ACCESS/ -> 71LITY EASEMENT 3,503 SQUARE FEET 0 0.08 ACRES i EXCEPTIONS 1. NOT SURVEY RELATED 2. NOT SURVEY RELATED 3. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON SAID PREMISES AS GRANTED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2616092. (NOT PLOTABLE) 4. NOT SURVEY RELATED 5. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDING INFORMATION: MAY 06, 1969 FOR: 6506182 (DOCUMENT NOT LEGIBLE) 6. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDING INFORMATION:8508200804 IN FAVOR OF: LAKEHAVEN SEWER DISTRICT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR: SEWER MAINS WITH THE NECESSARY APPURTENANCES (PLOTTED) 7. BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: 'BETWEEN: JOHN A. VERMEULEN AND MARY E. VERMEULEN AND: PARK 16, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDING INFORMATION: 20140530002015, (PLOTTED) 8. CONDITIONS, NOTES, EASEMENTS, PROVISIONS AND/OR ENCROACHMENTS CONTAINED OR DELINEATED ON THE FACE OF THE SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO, 20140414900001. (SEE BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT) t y - ,67171OrU / SSMH RIM 210.00 IE CTR CHANNEL 200.05 15" PVC W. 24" PVC E. SS N 88'56' 18"W 1044.51'(C) 1044.5'(D) REFERENCES (R-1) THE PLAT OF NINE FIRS FILED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8208240565. (R-2) RECORD OF SURVEY FILED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20080909900013. C, - E, S, Jw "C. CIMIL E/VG/NEER//VG of SURYEl%A/G Bus: 253 848-4282 429 29TH STREET NE, SUITE D Fax: 253 848-4278 PUYALLUP, WA 98372 ceservices@cesnwinc.com RECORDING NO. VOL./PAGE SCALE: 1 inch = 40 ft. 111111 40' 20' 0 40' 80, PORTION OF SE 1 /4 of NE 1 /4, SECTION 29 TWP. 21 N., R. 4 E., W.M. - 20 21 MONUMENT IN CASE BRASS DISK WITH 'X' 29 128 DOWN 0.9' FOUND SECTION CORNER (AS NOTED) FOUND QUARTER CORNER (AS NOTED) (M) MEASURED DISTANCE (D) DEED DISTANCE (C) CALCULATED (R-1) REFERENCE SURVEY p STORM CATCH. BASIN STORM CULVERT WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE OTR TELEPHONE RISER A_, WETLAND FLAG 8 BOLLARD MW MONITOR WELL X FENCE (AS NOTED) EDGE OF PAVEMENT SD STORM DRAIN LINE SURVEY NOTES SS SANITARY SEWER LINE BASIS OF BEARINGS NAD 83-2011 (EPOCH 2O10.00), WASHINGTON STATE PLANE, NORTH ZONE, (PER THE WASHINGTON STATE REFERENCE NETWORK). VERTICAL DATUM NGVD 29, TO CONVERT NAVD88 SUBTRACT 3.54 FEET TO GET NGVD 29 PER NOAA VERTCON. METHODS & EQUIPMENT THIS SURVEY COMPLIES WITH ALL STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES OF THE "SURVEY RECORDING ACT", CHAPTER 58.09 RCW AND 332.130 WAC METHOD: FIELD TRAVERSE AND GPS OBSERVATIONS IN MAY, 2018. EQUIPMENT USED: FOCUS 30 TOTAL STATION AND TRIMBLE R8 GPS. ALL INSTRUMENTS UTILIZED DURING THE COURSE OF THIS SURVEY ARE MAINTAINED IN CONFORMANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1 FOOT, WETLAND FLAGS WERE SET BY HABITAT TECHNOLOGIES IN "ENVIRONMENTALLY" CRITICAL AREAS ASSESSMENT DATED 6/13/2016. APPROVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2017. WETLAND DELINEATIONS SHALL BE VALID FOR FIVE YEARS; AT SUCH DATE THE CITY SHALL DETERMINE o WHETHER A REVISION OR ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENT IS NECESSARY. i ZONING DESIGNATION: RS 15.0= 1 DWELLING UNIT PER 15,000 SQUARE FEET i ALL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO FWRC 19.145.160 'BUILDING SETBACKS', AND FWRC 19.145.180 'CRITICAL AREA MARKERS, SIGNS, AND FENCES'. 1 MONUMENT IN CASE 29 28 BRASS DISK WITH P.M. DOWN 1.8' BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR PAVLO SOKALSKYY DRAWN BY: MJC I DATE 8-10-18 CHECKED BY: SDO I SCALE 1 " = 40' JOB NO. 18066 SHEET 2 of 2 �wb�` av &ck-u�` a .Sb,