Loading...
20-100609cfry of . Federal Way March 19, 2020 Ms. Savanna Nagorski ESM Consulting Engineers 33400 8d, Avenue south, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 tiarfittna._ ! >Vlki u ee cis• iim 33325 8'h Avenue South 25 Federal Way, WA 53 835-7Q00 www.cjt offederalwa .com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Re: File #?0-1ssppLicATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY SnlalslcyyReasonable Use, Parcels 2 104-9D i & 2921U4-909Federal Way Dear Ms. Nagoxski: ith the City of Federal Way', velopment Thank you for applying for a preapplicadon commentconferens from members of the DRC• neD emberss who mew Committee pRC). This letter summarizes comet and Building Di%rtsions reviewed your project -and provided .comments include staff from tlse city's Planning tives from Lakchaven Water and Sewer and Public Works Department, and .represent Federal Cadet and relevant information King th King Fire and Rescue, some sections of the F" handouts are enclosed with this letter. Please be to the complete RVRC and other relevanta odes for alldes. In preparing your formal application, please refer P additional requirements that may apply to your project. The key contact for Your project is Principal Planner Stacey Welsh. You can contact the atlease8 ont ct the 34, r s a �� els ci . fe e • way ❑ .For specific technical questions aboutuestionour sabout he preapplication appropriate DRC representative as listed below. a.theswise, any g q and petting process can be referred to me. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ro erties encumbered by a wetland/buffer. The The propasal 2921 is for Reasonable Use of two singlulY P P project is proposed on King County tax parcels 292104 9060 and 292104-9091. MAJOR ISSUES project based on the plans and information Outlined below is a summary of the major issues of your submitted for preapplication review. These issue t�� light critical ritica due to lrelquirement cations and revisions es. Please beans. Tire major issues section is only provided as a m sure to read the comments made by all departments an in the following section of this letter. 0 Planning Division: The project requires a Process III land use application for each property. Ms. Savanna Nagorski Page 2 of 9 March 18, 2020 Public Works Traffic Division 1. Transpartatran Concmnrng Management (FWRC t9 90) — A transportation concurrency permit with the application fee of $1,773.00 is required. 2. Trn,#rt Impact Fees (FTPRC 1997) — A traffic iinipact fee will be assessed at building permit stage for each lot. 3. Frontage IN (FWRC 19-135.040) — Construct street frontage improvement along the property frontage on South 359� Street. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Outlined below are the comments made by the representatives of each department present at the preappbcation conference. Each section should be read thoroughly. If you have questions, please contact the representative listed for that section. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — PLANNING DIVISION Stacey Welsh, 253-835-2634, race 1 h p. cir< offedei 1 • Zoning DesiBnaiian and Use— The subject properties are designated Single -Family Residential (TtS ! 5.0); the Proposed use is single-family residential, which is a permitted use in the RSy zone as listed within and subject to the regulations set forth in the Use Zone Chart of FWRC 19-200.010 2. State Enviranmejstal Policy Act (SEPA) —As long as no work is proposed not be triggered. within wetlands, then SEPA will 3. L-and UreAppk'tatio►r—Per F%RC 19.45.Q90(2), an provisions of Chapter 19.I45 For applicant maya 1 For a modification or waiver of the projects on single-family residential lots using process III. Process III is a review process conducted by city staff with a final decision Fissued by the Community Development Zia are contained in WRC 19-65.100(2). A Reasonable Use Director. The Process III decision crite Proposal must also meet the criteria contained in FWRC 19.145.090(3). 4. Land Use Renew Timeframes — The Planning Division win notify the applicant of the application status 'within 28 days of submittal. If the application is determined complete, staff will issue a Letter of Complete AlopIication. The F'WRC limits the administrative review to 120 days from the date of a complete application. The 120-day review period will stop any time the applicant has been requested by the city to correct plans, perform required studies, or provide additional information needed to issue a decision. The review period will begin within 14 days following submittal of requested items. Please be advised that any request for corrections and/or additional information must be provided within 180 days of mitten notification, or the land use application will expire. 5. Process III applications require a public notice and comment period. Within 14 days of issuing the Letter of Complete Application, a Notice o£Application will be published in the Federal Way Minor, pasted on the subject property, placed at the city's three designated notice boards, Property owners within 300 feet of the subject property, and mailed to 0• Land Use Application Smbxittal Regidrementt — Please refer to the enclosed Bulletin #001, "Submittal Requirements for Use Process III or IV," to determine what materials must be submitted with the land use application, 20-100609-PC Doc ID 80164 Ms. Savanna Nagorski Page 3 of 9 March 18, 2020 7. Effect of Use Process Decision — In accordance with FWRC 19.15.100(2), "Lapse of Approval - Generally," the applicant must substantially complete construction for the development activity, use of land, or other actions approved; and complete the applicable conditions listed in the Use Process decision within five years after the final decision of the city on the matter, or the decision becomes void. Provisions for extension of time are contained within FWRC 19.15.110, "Lapse of Approval — Time Extension." 8. General Zoning Regulations — The use zone chart of FWRC 19.200.010 (enclosed) provides regulations for the proposed use. The applicant should consult the referenced use zone chart prior to submitting a Master Land Use Application to verify all site components and proposed uses will comply with city code. The following is only a portion of the zoning regulations governing the proposed use in the RS zone: Detached dwelling unit (FWRC 19.200.010) Required Yards, Lot Coverage, Building Height, Parking — Required yards, lot coverage, building height, and parking are: i. Front/side/rear setback — 20'/5'/5', Street side setback on a corner lot is 10% see FWRC 19.05.160 "P definitions" for definition of "property line" and item (2), yard setbacks, for flag lots; South 359th Street is a minor collector. ii. Maximum lot coverage —50% iii. Maximum building height — 30' above average building elevation iv. Parking — Two spaces per dwelling unit 9. Wetlands/Reasonable Use — The properties have previously gone through a wetland report peer review. Under city file no. 16-105771-AD it was determined as documented in a September 18, 2017, letter that there is a Category II wetland on -site (Wetland A) with a 165-foot buffer and a Category I wetland off - site (Wetland B) with a 225-foot buffer, and that both parcels were completely encumbered by the buffers from Wetland A and B. The two lots were later reconfigured via a Boundary Line Adjustment (city file no. 18-102925-SU) approved on December 11, 2018, and recorded under King County recording number 20190208900013. The current proposal is for reasonable use of two single-family properties encumbered by wetlands/ buffers. Per FWRC 19.45.090(2), an applicant may apply for a modification or waiver of the provisions of Chapter 19.145 for projects on single-family residential lots using process III. Each property must apply for an receive approval of a Use Process III land use application. A single Use Process III cannot cover both lots because they are two individual project requests on separate pieces of property that must stand on their own. Also, Reasonable Use is to grant the ability to build one home, not two. The previous, June 13, 2016, wetland delineation prepared by Habitat Technologies is valid for a five-year period. The city updated the wetland buffer requirements in the FWRC via Ordinance No. 19-873, adopted in July 2019. As part of the Use Process III submittal, provide a memorandum or report addendum to update the Wetland A and B buffer widths to reflect current code, FWRC 19.145.420. A buffer enhancement/mitigation plan prepared by a qualified professional for development within the wetland buffers will also need to be submitted. In addition, provide a written narrative addressing the Reasonable Use criteria contained within FWRC 19.145.090(3). Regarding Reasonable Use, per FWRC 19.145.090: "(4) If the city grants a request under this section, it shall grant the minimum necessary to provide the applicant with some reasonable use of the subject property, considering the factors described in subsections (3) (a) through (e) of this section. Any approval or waiver of requirements shall result in 20-100609-PC Doc TD 80164 Ms. Savanna Nagorski Page 4 of 9 March 18, 2020 the minimum possible impacts to the function and values and/or risks associated with proposed improvements on affected critical areas. The city may impose limitations, mitigation under an approved mitigation plan, conditions and/or restrictions it considers appropriate to reduce or eliminate any undesirable effects or adverse impacts of granting a request under this section." In response to questions listed by the applicant in the preapplication meeting request submittal: ■ A reasonable size house has been deemed to be a building footprint up to 1,600 square feet, including garage, and the building height as allowed in the use zone chart. ■ The applicant's wetland consultant will need to put together a buffer enhancement/mitigation plan for city review. • A 24' x 24' driveway is too large, as driveway width is limited to 20' per FWRC 19.130.140(1). • If the applicant chooses to use a septic system rather than connect to sewer, that will have to be considered as part of the reasonable use request and may impact the overall proposal and required mitigation. See FWRC 19.145.090(4). 10. Outside Agency Permits— It is the applicant's responsibility to identify and obtain all required state, federal, or other agency permits as may be required. 11. Application Fees & Submittal— Please contact the Permit Center at hcnniscentcr [nr Cirvrrffsdr rapt a�'.cr�tn_, or 253-835-2607, for updated fee schedule information for applications and permits. PUBLIC WORKS — DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION Kevin Peterson, 253-835-2734, kevin.peterson@cityoffederalway.com Land Use Issues — Stormwater 1. At the time of the land use application, a drainage plan shall be submitted that shows how stormwater runoff from all new impervious surfaces will be managed. Currently, the city requires stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP's) to be per the requirements of Appendix C of the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). 2. If infiltration is proposed, soil logs prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer or septic designer must be provided to verify infiltration suitability. 3. Show the proposed location and dimensions of any flow control BMP's on the preliminary plans. Right -of -Way Improvements 1. See the Traffic Division comments from Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Sarady Long for traffic related items. 2. All stormwater treatment and detention requirements outlined above may apply to any improvements within the private easements or public right-of-way. 20-100609-PC Doc ID 80164 Ms. Savanna Nagorski Page 5 of 9 March 18, 2020 Building Permit Issues 1. The building permit materials will be reviewed under the city's single-family residential (SFR) permit process. Submittal requirements for SFR permits are available under the city's website for Building Division handouts, or can be picked up at the Permit Center. 2. A stoxmwater System Development Charge will be added to the building permit fees. 3. To assist the applicant's engineer in preparing the plans and TIR, the Federal Way Public Works Development Standards Manual (including standard detail drawings, standard notes, and engineering checklists) is available on the city's website at http://www.cityoffederalway.com/index.aspx?nid=171. 4. When topographic survey information is shown on the plans, the vertical datum block shall include the phrase "DATUM: N.G.V.D.-29" or "DATUM: K.C.A.S.," on all sheets where vertical elevations are called out. 5. Drawings submitted for plan review shall be printed on 24" x 36" or 22" x 34" paper. Site plans shall be drawn at a scale of 1" = 20', or larger. Architectural scales are not permitted on engineering plans. 6. Provide cut and fill quantities on the clearing and grading plan. PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC DIVISION Sarady Long, 253-835-2743, saradv.ion a cityoffedera1Nva y.cnm Transportation Concurrency Analysis (FWRC 19.90) 1. Based on the submitted materials for one lot and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation - 10th Edition, land use code 210 (Detached Single Family Residential), the proposed project is estimated to generate approximately one new weekday PM peak hour trip and nine daily trips. 2. A concurrency permit is required for this development project. The PW Traffic Division will perform a concurrency analysis to determine if adequate roadway capacity exists during the weekday PM peak period to accommodate the proposed development. Please note that supplemental transportation analysis and concurrency mitigation may be required if the proposed project creates an impact not anticipated in the six -year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). 3. The estimated fee for the concurrency permit application is $1,773.00 (1 - 10 trips). This fee is an estimate and based on the materials submitted for the preapplication meeting. The concurrency fee must be paid in full at the time the concurrency permit application is submitted with the land use application. The fee may change based on the new weekday PM peak hour trips as identified in the concurrency trip generation. The applicant has the option of having an independent traffic engineer prepare the concurrency analysis consistent with city procedures; however, the fee remains the same. Transportation Impact Fees (TIF) (FWRC 19.91) 1. Based on the submitted materials, the estimated traffic impact fee is $4,251 per lot. The actual fee will be assessed and collected from the applicant when the building permit is issued, using the fee schedule then in effect (FWRC 19.100.070[3] [c]). 20-100609-PC Doc 1D 80164 Ms. Savanna Nagorski Page 6 of 9 March 18, 2020 Street Frontage Improvements (FWRC 19.135) The applicant/owner will be expected to construct street improvements consistent with the planned roadway cross -sections as shown in Map III-4 in Chapter III of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) shown as Table III-10 (FWRC 19.135.040). Based on the materials submitted, staff conducted a limited analysis to determine the required street improvements. The applicant will be expected to construct improvements on the following streets to the city's planned roadway cross-section: a South 359111 Street shall be a Type "R" street, consisting of a 40-foot street with curb and gutter, 4-foot planter strips with street trees, 6-foot sidewalks, and street lights in a 66-foot right-of-way. Assuming a symmetrical cross section, half street improvements and a three- foot right-of-way dedication are required. The applicant will be expected to construct these improvements at such time a permit application is submitted. a A private easement serving two lots shall be per Dwg No. 3-2CC (16-foot minimum paved road within a 20-foot easement). It appears that the existing trees/vegetation to the west may need to be removed to meet sight distance requirements. Verify intersection sight distance analysis at the private road easement on South 35911, Street. 2. The applicant may make a written request to the Public Works Director to modify, defer, or waive the required street improvements (FWRC 19.135.070). Information about a right-of-way modification request are available through the Public Works Development Services Division. These modification requests have a nominal review fee currently at $344. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — BUILDING DIVISION Scott Sproul, 253-835-2621, scott.sproul@cityoffederalway.com 1. Building Codes. The structure will be treated as a new building permit application and must meet all current codes. 2. Building PermitApplicalion Process. Copies of the application and checklists may be obtained on our web site at R'u�C.GFL'nfFLdel'alu'al".Cr.7tn. Please note, land use approval is recommended prior to submitting the building permit application to avoid delay in project review. If the project has not received land use approval, it may be placed on hold until land use review is completed. 3. Review Timing. Federal Way reviews plans on a first in, first out basis; however, there are some small projects with inconsequential review requirements that may be reviewed out of order. The first comment letter can be expected within five to seven weeks of the submittal date. Re -check of plans will occur in one to three weeks after resubmittal. Revised or resubmitted plans shall be provided in the same format, size, and amount as the originally submitted plans. Revised/resubmitted drawings shall indicate by means of clouding or written response, what changes have been made from the original drawings. Plans for all involved departments will be forwarded from the Community Development Department. 20-100609-PC Doc TD 80164 Ms. Savanna Nagorski Page 7 of 9 March 18, 2020 The information provided is based on limited plans and information. The comments provided are not intended to be a complete plan review and further comments are possible at time of building permit plan review. LAKEHAVEN WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT Brian Asbury, 253-946-5407, BAsbury@lakehaven.org Water • A Water Certificate of Availability issued separately by Lakehaven may be required to be submitted with any land use and/or building permit applications (check with land use agency for requirement). The certificate is valid for one year from the date of issuance. If a certificate is needed, allow one to two working days to issue for typical processing. The 2020 cost for a Water Certificate of Availability is $80.00. ■ Fire flow at no less than 20 psi available within the existing water distribution system is a minimum of 1,000 GPM (approximate) for two hours or more. This flow figure represents Lakehaven's adopted minimum level of service goals for residential areas regarding performance of the existing water distribution system under high demand conditions. If more precise available, and/or estimated onsite, fire flow figures are required or desired, the applicant can request Lakehaven perform a system hydraulic model analysis (separate from., or concurrent with, an application for availability). The 2020 cost for a system hydraulic model analysis is $240.00. ■ A water service connection application submitted separately to Lakehaven is required for each new service connection to the water distribution system, in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current "Fees and Charges Resolution." • Service pressure(s) greater than 80 psi is indicated, and Pressure Reducing Valve(s) is indicated; contact the local building official for requirements and/or additional information. • Based on the proposal submitted, preliminary estimated Lakehaven water service connection fees, charges, and/or deposits (2020 schedule) will be as follows. Actual connection charges will be detemvned upon submittal of service connection application(s) to Lakehaven. Charges -Payable -in -Lieu -of -Extension (CPILOE) are assessable against the property for water facilities previously constructed that provide direct benefit to the property. All Lakehaven fees, charges, and deposits are typically reviewed and adjusted (if necessary) annually, and are subject to change without notice. • Water Service/Meter Installation, 1" preliminary size: $5,480.00 deposit (each). Actual size TBD by Lakehaven based on UPC plumbing fixture count (or fire -protection system demand, if required). • Capital Facilities Charge(s)-Water: $4,503.95 (each). • CPILOE-2921049060: $2,823.19. • CPILOE-2921049091: $671.96. • Right -of -Way Permit Fee (Federal Way): $980.00 (each). Sewer • A Sewer Certificate of Availability issued separately by Lakehaven may be required to be submitted with any land use and/or building permit applications (check with land use agency for requirement). The certificate is valid for one year from date of issuance. If a certificate is needed, allow one to two working days to issue for typical processing. The 2020 cost for a Sewer Certificate of Availability is $80.00. 20-100609-PC Doc ID 80164 Ms. Savanna Nagorski Page 8 of 9 March 18, 2020 ■ A separate Lakehaven Sewer Service Connection Permit is required for each new connection to the sanitary sewer system, in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current 'Tees and Charges Resolution." Minimum pipe slope for gravity sewer service connections is two percent. ■ Presuming the service connection for parcel 2921049091 will be to the existing sewer main in South 359th Street, proof of a recorded private, sewer easement will be required across parcel 2921049060, for the benefit of the portion of the sewer service connection line across said adjacent property. This private easement shall cover off -site property along the route of the affected portion of the sewer service connection line from the edge of public right-of-way to parcel 2921049091. Based on the proposal submitted, preliminary estimated Lakehaven sewer service connection fees, charges, and/or deposits (2020 schedule) will be as follows. Actual connection charges will be determined upon submittal of service connection application(s) to Lakehaven. Charges -Payable -in -Lieu -of -Extension (CPILOE) are assessable against the property for sewer facilities previously constructed that provide direct benefit to the property. All Lakehaven fees, charges, and deposits are typically reviewed and adjusted (if necessary) annually, and are subject to change without notice. • Sewer Service Connection Permit: $517.20 fee (each). • Capital Facilities Charge(s)-Sewer: $4,297.07 (each). • CPILOE-2921049060: $15,309.16. • CPILOE-2921049091: $13,208.80. • Right -of -Way Permit Fee (Federal Way): $980.00 (each). General • All Lakehaven development engineering related application forms, and associated standards information, can be accessed at Lakehaven's web pages: Iittp:/204/Development-En gincering. • All comments herein are valid for one year and are based on the proposal(s) submitted and Lakehaven's current regulations and policies. Any change to either the development proposal(s) or Lakehaven's regulations and policies may affect the above comments accordingly. SOUTH KING FIRE AND RESCUE Sean Nichols, 253-946-7242, sean.nichols@southlcingfire.org Water Supply Fire Flat) A Certificate of WaterAvailabiliiy shall be requested from the water district and provided at the time of the building permit application. Fire Hydrants The existing fire hydrant on South 3591h Street is sufficient for this project. Fire hydrants shall be in service prior to and during the time of construction. Emergency Access Fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all requirements of Fire Access Policy 10.006: hrtl�:!/3rTutltkirig re.s�rgllJr.tclnnctirCciztes/f l me/Vic%v/24. 20-100609-PC Doc TD 80164 Ms. Savanna Nagorski Page 9 of 9 March 18, 2020 Fire apparatus access roads shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction. Access to the north lot is less than 20 feet wide and an approved turnaround is not provided. Vehicle Access Gates All vehicle access gates shall comply with the Gate Policy- hr /sou l-tkingftrc.or /Docuazic1stC:enter/Honig/View 121. Fire Sprinkler System Fire sprinklers are required for the north lot, unless an approved turnaround is provided. The need for a NFPA 13D fire sprinkler system for the south lot will be determined at the time of the building permit submission. CLOSING This letter reflects the information provided at the preapplication meeting and is intended to assist you in preparing plans and materials for the formal application. We hope you found the comments useful to your project. We have made every effort to identify major issues to eliminate surprises during the city's review of the formal application. The completion of the preapplication process in the content of this letter does not vest any future project application. Comments in this letter are only, valid for one year as per FWRC 19.40.070(4). This is a preliminary review only and does not take the place of the full review that will follow submission of a formal application. Comments provided in this letter are based on preapphcation materials submitted. Modifications and revisions to the project as presented for this preapplication may influence and modify information regarding development requirements outlined above. In addition to this preapplication letter, please examine the complete FWRC and other relevant codes carefully. Requirements that are found in the codes that are not addressed in this letter are still required for your project. If you have questions about an individual comment, please contact the appropriate department representative noted above. Any general questions can be directed towards me, the key project contact, Stacey Welsh, at 253-835-2634, or staccr.welsh We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Stacey Welsh, AICP Principal Planner enc: Bulletin 001 "Process III or IV Submittal Requirements" FWRC 19.200.010 Bulletin 002 "Mailing Labels" Lakehaven Map Bulletin 003 "Master Land Use Application" c: Kevin Peterson, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Scott Sproul, Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Sean Nichols, South King Fire & Rescue Pavlo Sokalskyy, 1210 M Street SE, #33, Auburn, WA 98002 Yuriy Momotyuk, Yumo Construction LLC, 27327 48th Avenue South, Kent, WA, 98032, curiym et usa.com 20-100609-PC Doc iD 80164 CITY OF _A4$� Federal Way Centered on Opportunity February 25, 2020 Ms. Savanna Nagorski ESM Consulting Engineers 33400 8th Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 nn .na ki viLc R .,J'ZV CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Re: File #20-100609-PC; PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED Sokalskyy Reasonable Use, Parcels 292104-9060 & 292104-9091, Federal Way Dear Ms. Nagorski: The Community Development Department is in receipt of your preapplication conference request. The application has been routed to members of the Development Review Committee (DRC) and a meeting with the project applicant has been scheduled as follows: 11:00 a.m- — Thursday, March 12, 2020 Hylebos Conference Room Federal Way City Hall, 2na Floor 33325 8s' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 We look Forward to meeting with you. Please coordinate directly with anyone else you would like to attend tlae meeting as this will be the only notice sent by the department. If you have any questions regarding the meeting, please contact me at l .c m, or 253-835-2634. Sincerely; Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner c: Yuriy Momotyuk, Yumo Construction LLC, 27327 48th Avenue South, Kent, WA, 98032, v-r mDusa.com Pavlo Sokalskyy, 1210 M Street SE, #33, Auburn, WA 98002 Doc. I.D. 80163 20-100609-00-PC CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2-21-20 TO: Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager Scott Sproul, Building Official Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: ` Stacey Welsh, Senior Planner! FOR DRC MTG. ON: 3-5-20 - Internal 3-12-20, 11:00 - with applicant FILE NUMBER(s): 20-100609-PC RELATED FILE NOS.: 16-105771-AD & 18-102925-SU (BLA) PROJECT NAME: SOKALSKYY REASONABLE USE PROJECT ADDRESS: *NO SITE ADDRESS* PARCEL NUMBER: 292104-9060 & 292104-9091 ZONING DISTRICT: RS 15.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reasonable use of two single-family properties encumbered by wetland/buffer. LAND USE PERMITS: Use Process III (Critical Areas Reasonable Use) PROJECT CONTACT: Savanna Nagorski ESM Consulting Engineers 33400 8t' Ave S, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 savanna.naaorski@esmcivil.com 253-838-6113 MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Master Land Use Application Cover Letter Aerial Photo Wetland Memo Site Drawing '4k CITY OF Pnrinrnl \Ab\/ RECEIVED FEB 12 2020 y CUN� o�I�PM �M MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8"' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com N %1 /� 1 APPLICATION NO(S) �v — V D Date d2 `�� -a �do Project Name Reasonable Use 359th Property Address/Location 12XX S 359th St east of Hylebos Wetlands Parcel Number(s) 292104-9091, -9060 Project Description Reasonable use to build a single-family home on each parcel. Hylebos Wetlands to the west of the site and an onsite wetland buffer extend across the properties. PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information RS 15.0 Zoning Designation SF Comprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type Construction Type Applicant Name: Yuriy Momotyuk, Yumo Construction LLC Address: 27327 48th Ave S City/State: Kent, WA Zip: 98032 Phone: Fax: Email: yuriym @ usa.com Signature: Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Savanna Naqorski, ESM Consultinq Enqineers Address: 33400 8th Ave S, Suite 205 City/State: Federal Way, WA Zip: 98003 Phone: 253-838-6113 Fax: Email: savanna nagorski@esmcivil.com Signature: / J 1� Owner Name: Pavlo Sokalskyyy Address: 1210 M St SE, #33 City/State: Auburn, WA 98002 Zip: Phone: 253-335-6818 Fax: Email: Signa Bulletin #003 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application r RECE-AVID FEB 12 2020 February 11, 2020 Mr. Robert "Doc" Hansen Planning Manager Department of Community Development City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Request for Pre -Application Conference Reasonable Use, 12XX S 359th Street Dear Mr. Hansen: Job No. 2120-001-020 Please accept this letter and accompanying information as our request, on behalf of Yumo Construction, LLC, for a pre -application conference with the City of Federal Way for a reasonable use proposal of two properties located at 12XX S 359th Street. The following is a general project narrative describing the proposed project concept as well as questions in bold italics related to the various design elements: Zonin The subject properties consist of King County parcels 292104-9060 and -9091 and are zoned RS15.0. They are each approximately 0.86 acres adjacent to S 359th Street and the Hylebos Wetlands site in the City of Federal Way. Both parcels are currently vacant, with no street addresses or improvements except for a gravel driveway for access to adjacent properties. Surrounding uses are as follows: • North: Hylebos Wetland Property Y South: Single -Family Residential East: Single -Family Residential • West: Hylebos Wetland Property 33400 8th Ave S. Ste 205 Tel (253) 838 6113 Everett (425) 297 9900 Civil Engineering Land Planning Federal Way. WA 98003 Fax (253) 838 7104 Toll Free (800) 345 5694 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture www.esmciviL.com 30 Laser Scanning GIs Mr. Robert "Doc" Han February 11, 2020 Page 2 Critical Areas and Reasonable Use Each parcel has potential to meet the underlying zoning standards for single-family residential uses within the RS15.0 zone. However, the site is encumbered by a Category III wetland with 6-7 habitat points, requiring a 150' buffer per FWRC 19.145.420.2. The buffer from this onsite wetland encompasses the entirety of both properties. In addition, the Hylebos Wetlands west and north of the subject sites have a 250' buffer that also overlaps the properties. Please refer to the excerpt from Response to City of Federal Way Letter of February 1, 2019 provided by Habitat Technologies, dated May 10, 2017, for a brief description of the wetlands and a map of onsite wetlands. Applying provisions from FWRC 19.145.440(4-6) is not feasible for development of the site. We understand that FWRC 19.145.090 provides standards related to reasonable use processes within the City. It is our understanding that based on the criteria in (3), a proposed single-family home for each parcel may be approvable. Please provide a list of required reports and permits for approval of a reasonable use within an onsite wetland buffer. Proposed Use and Layout The depicted project layout included with this application proposes to build a single-family home for each of the two lots, maintaining the existing access and extending minimally for the new buildings. The homes will front the existing access that extends north into the two properties from 3591h Please confirm the maximum single-fami/y building footprint size to lot size ratio allowed for a home in a reasonable use situation. Otherwise, please provide the maximum building footprint approvable for these individual sites /fmitigation for the wetland buffers is provided. What extent of mitigation is required to build the single-family KrIll the City also accept a 24' x 24' driveway fronting the house to the existing access easement? Please confirm ff the existing 25' access and utility easement will need to be impro ved. Utilities Water and sanitary sewer services provided by Lakehaven Water and Sewer District are available in the adjacent right-of-way to the property. It is anticipated that these existing water and sewer facilities will provide adequate capacity for the proposed two single-family homes. The property owners may use the most cost-effective approach for sewage disposal, whether it be on -site septic or connecting to the sewer main. Mr. Robert "Doc" Hanst. February 11, 2020 Page 3 Are mains required to extend to serve the 21ots, or can we extend stubs from each home? What are additional requirements if the property owner intends to use an on -site septic system as opposed to connect to the sewer main, in relation to the reasonable use and wetland buffer vicinity? Stormwater What stormwaterrequirements will be placed for the development of the individual homes approved through the reasonable use exception? Pre -Application Conference Submittal The following items are included in this submittal: • Project Narrative (this letter, 8 copies); • Master Land Use Application; • Existing Site Exhibit w/ Vicinity Map (8 copies); ■ Conceptual Site Plan Drawing (8 copies); ■ Excerpt from Habitat Technologies (8 copies); and • Submittal fee of $581.00. We understand that these materials constitute a complete submittal and ask that the City schedule a Pre -Application Conference at your next available date. Please contact me upon your receipt and review of this information to confirm the date and time. Thank you for your attention to this project and we look forward to working with the City. Very truly yours, ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, L.L.C. AVANNA NAGORSKI, MS Land Use Planner Enc: As Noted cc: Yuriy Momotyuk, Yumo Construction IlesmMengrlesm-jobs12120100110201documentlletter-001.docx HABITAT TECHNOLOGIES May 10, 2017 Mr. Yuriy Momotyuk @ YUMO Construction LLC 27327 — 48th Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 e-mail yuriym@usa.com Mr. Pavlo Sokalshyy @ Dim Construction Inc. 1210 M Street SE, Suite 33 Auburn, Washington 98002 RECEIVED FEB 12 2020 Wh MUNIIY DEy pp,�� RE: Response to City of Federal Way Letter of February 1, 2017 Parcels 2921049060 and 2921049091 South 359t' Street, City of Federal Way, King County Dear Project Team, Pursuant to the comments provided in the City of Federal Way letter dated February 1, 2017, Habitat Technologies has completed a series of onsite re -assessments and has met onsite with the City of Federal Way environmental review staff. This re -assessment process has allowed for additional field data collection, an extended review of seasonal hydrology patterns, and an updated wetland delineation. Item #1 — Describe the methods used for determining the boundary of the West Hylebos Wetland Corridor located offsite and west of the project site as shown on Revised Figure 8. Discussion: As identified within the Environmentally Critical Areas Assessment dated June 13, 2016 the West Fork of Hylebos Creek Corridor was located offsite to the west of the project site. The wetland associated with this corridor adjacent to the project site was identified as best meeting the criteria for designation as a City of Federal Way Category I Wetland with a 225-foot standard buffer. This Corridor would also appear to meet the criteria for designation as a City of Federal Way "Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas." Additional assessment was completed between early February and mid -May 2017 to provide a more accurate depiction of the approximate edge of the wetland associated with the West Fork of Hylebos Creek Corridor adjacent to the project site. This additional assessment included additional onsite evaluations and a more detailed review of prior wetland assessment surveys of parcels within the local area. As a result of this additional assessment the approximate wetland boundary has been depicted on the Revised Figure 8 (attached). As with the 2016 assessment, the identified wetland boundary for this offsite corridor was not specifically flagged, wetlands, streams, fisheries, wildlife — mitigation and permitting solutions P.O. Box 1088, Puyallup, Washington 98371 253-845-5119 contact@habitattechnologies.net was not defined by the hand-held field GPS (with the exception of the wetland adjacent to the northern boundary of the project site), and was not professionally surveyed following the 2017 assessment. As defined within the Environmentally Critical Areas Assessment dated June 13, 2016 the project site had been modified by prior land use actions. These actions had included the prior import and placement of fill particularly along the northern boundary of the project site. The offsite wetland to the north was identified at the toe of this prior fill using a hand-held GIPS (Off 1 and Off 2) and depicted on the Revised Figure 8. Item #2 — Show the location of all sample plots on Figure W1 and revise field data forms as needed. Discussion: Following the onsite meeting with City of Federal Way environmental review staff a series of additional sample plots was established throughout the project site. The 2107 sample plots are depicted on Revised Figure 8 and were used to provide an updated wetland boundary based on existing site conditions identified between early February and mid -May 2017. The collection of this additional field data, coupled with the 2016 field data, allowed for a refinement of the onsite wetland boundary (Wetland A). The boundary identified during the 2017 assessment period was defined with wooden lath and flagging. Routine mowing of the project site had removed the majority of 2016 wire flagging. As a result of above normal seasonal rainfall events during the early February and mid -May 2017 assessment period the pattern of seasonal surface water movement across the project site was also refined over the 2016 assessment. As noted during 2017 seasonal surface water was identified to move generally from the northeast to the southwest across the project site. No seasonal surface water was identified to enter and travel across the project site from the northern boundary. In addition, no seasonal surface water was identified to exit the site to the west as a result of an elevated buried utility corridor along the entire western boundary of the project site. As noted during the 2016 assessment the onsite surface water appeared to be terminating within the small excavated pond in the southwestern portion of the project site. This area of the excavated pond had been managed as a garden during prior growing seasons. However, as noted during the 2017 assessment onsite surface water was identified to continue to the south from the area of the excavated pond. At the southern boundary of the project site seasonal surface water was identified to enter a created road -side ditch associated with South 359th Street. Once within the created road -side ditch seasonal surface water entered a controlled inlet to a culver leading to the south and out letting to the south of South 359tn Street. 16070 As noted in the Environmentally Critical Areas Assessment dated June 13, 2016 Wetland A was best defined as mixture of managed lawn, garden area, and an excavated farm pond. This wetland was dominated by a grass and herb plant community and included a few trees and shrubs generally around the pond. The 2017 assessment also identified that a portion of the created roadside ditch along South 359th Street also exhibited wetland characteristics. This area (flagged onsite as Wetland B) was regularly managed as a part of roadway maintenance actions and appeared best defined as an "intentionally created feature." As such, this roadside ditch would not appear to be regulated as a "wetland" and the City of Federal Way. In addition, this roadside ditch was located offsite and would require City of Federal Way approval for any work within the right of way. Item #3 — Provide an accuracy statement for the wetland boundary mapping and describe the equipment used to survey/locate the wetland flags. Discussion: The location of the onsite wetland boundary and the sample plots was defined use a hand-held GPS (Garman GPS Map 60CSX). While not survey quality, this GPS identified spot locations typically accurate to within five meters. Accuracy increases with a lack of overhead vegetation obstructions and satellite locations. Item #4 — Revise the wetland rating form based on any adjustments to the wetland boundary. Discussion: As noted above the 2017 assessment identified a few additional site variations not identified during the 2016 assessment. Following this assessment, the wetland rating from for Wetland A has been updated (see attached). During the 2016 assessment Wetland A was identified as within a closed depression with no surface water outlet. However, as noted in 2017 Wetland A exhibited a surface water outflow to the south that entered the created roadside ditch associated with South 359th Street. As such, the rating numbers associated with the character of the surface water outflow from the wetland as depicted in questions D.1.1 and D.4.1 were revised from a score of 'A" to a score of "2." This change dropped the total wetland score from "20" points to "19" points resulting in a change in wetland category from "II" to "III." The standard buffer for either a Category II or Category III Wetland with a habitat score of 6 or 7 points is 165 feet. Please contact me with any questions or directions. Sincerely, Thomas D. Deming Habitat Technologies 16070 FIGURES 16070 N N A N e-- �- 0 , Q Z © W U*) J .� Z, N Q W CD cx � W �'- CL W Z :3 O d- I W CV Cq 0 Z m CD 0 CO wo z Q " W U LL S `-- 0 00 M OWU `� _V) (D -j Li Of C~.7 U < Z w F--Xa H� w�(L i Z � `� wO <C GL �- J U Z •cC 0 U) <::) '\ m (A (n J �'-� W U z w < Z m E-- O v7 }- Q W w F- m W V Z � U O U)0M H_ UJF- ��j �Q Uj m m ■ r 0 W 1. 1 M� w z z w U U w W �..l O `./ O� O t-- O 00 W Q © i"- �- W in O W m ¢ Lo Z ~UU I-`-OWo U� xZ LL. 0O W > F—`Z r)�LL 0 M W F�< � ¢ �... QQ p Z �� W �n�Z WO W W>U' ZLLJ Ljj WW W S Q Z W Q W Ut�� W W }— U CL IX ti,LL (nU f- W J S OW W (�!a Q00 Z �� W N .. Q m CD CL � � Li � U (L , , -1 !,,� Q � Q a- LLLJL to 0 W V- O H wF- in �, �,,,, = Q D 4 F-- U} (n a W Q W 0 O Z Z w r 0 Q O W a- Q w � cn U Ff < w i- Q W 0 Q F- �� m Z O '_ cad W is. — z zZ z ci Q W> �C Fn � w w LO Uii. 1 w W LA- cl (_ --� cn z uz w z .. Z W ©_._i [L m LLI 0 Y m `� '' O rn Q Q CV O a a a W x ED 7 <C C) UJ U m 04 O (Y O : O O U F- F- S O S d- LL F- FU-- w --j Z LL- m S h- tn3 a V„i LL' 1— U t— 5 (n Z Z _> Q W Z ,.. J H W O mzH-- >Z> H WC1Z O :UWCa. 0� NN QW H�O- (W).L6YS9Z 3,BC,lbION (301M 133j 09) 'S '3AV Hi9 L LO O C7 O N W Z z O r 0 :-�i Lei U • O�j} S N F- !Z Q- Uw s U)WLOd' WFX�,N r. in o co W x Q / w _.O � W -,,� J N \ so G O / V O �. a w a = h- Z F- C) Z 5 W `W Q p w W X L9 V� W �� a CO VOW w 00 O CCD O Ifto Z V- LJJ o N �O LU N �� W Lu ej W 0 1 V � Lu w ax tT " \V�.."_� ((n3H `1-8),,* t* t9c 0-0 Z Gl OC O U W w W 0 Z cl W J m (n w LL. LLJ CD Z Lri LL! o L i- J04 00 W °- N a:_00 W f- LL X �m W i � Z U )' {n z W < Q m �-- L.L.i C) z C) > < d W F- J W {n ♦[ U U QL � � a U W af ww¢o Lw O U)