Loading...
11-104463RECEIVED PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Carr of Nov O ��1 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way AY Federal Way WA 98835-6325 2709 253-835-2700;Fax 253-835-2709 r,T..� y ()F FEDERAL IlV www.cstyoffederalway.com C110S 2011 TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY REVIEW APPLICATION o� -103 1 11 - v©sC r APPLICATION NOW Date 1 - `i I Project Name 500 lnd V �-e kJ M a,i) o r Property Address/Location `J Li W h J b C�L d � SW � b C'-+' l Pnilqf RCL Parcel Number(s) i ' Z p 6WPO 4 110 - 916 Project Description F-Of-MLi J 4-� S lrl PROPERTY OWNER Name: i- Address: City/State/Zip: H 5T S Ul I-I-e t�v Email: Cell: Signature: APPLICANT (if different than Owner Name: /� e �\� J J I K C li IV Phone/Fax: Address: City/State/Zip: i S � 6d jDu L Email: . In WO Cell: Signature: k�4 j Type of Development permit to be applied for: (Op, L,,)A 9 % -7-2 40-1{z0Z ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily (MF) Y Subdivision ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Single Family (SF) ❑ None (Feasibility only) ❑ Other Approval for City to perform Concurrency analysis: ❑ Yes �dl No If NO: Applicant's Traffic Engineer must perform Concurrency analysis consistent with City procedures; however, the application fee remains the same. ,Sf-e atsO 03--103112--ChJ LADEPT\PW\TRA\Concurrency\CN Template\Final Template\FW Concurency Application Rev. Jan201 Ldoc Required Information — Application is incomplete and will be returned if not filled out. Gross Square Feet (Commercial) Existing iU /n Proposed _ N I 1 t Number of Dwelling Units Existing Proposed Number of Employees Existing Proposed ❑ Parcel size (acres or square footage) Existing CrProposed C. L 61 C Has the property previously been reviewed for concurrency? Yes No If yes, date of original application to --7J 62 Concurrency Permit No:(z7-00C/L/ Is this an amendment to an existing Concurrency Certificate? Yes No Will the project be phased? Development Build -Out Year Note: Commercial subdivisions and other projects constructed in phases shall be evaluated for concurrency as each phase is submitted For applicable development permits. Once the concurrency test result has been determined, any changes to the development project require additional review will be billed on an hourly basis. Estimated Number of New Trip Generated by Project per Pre -application Summary: , I() + If the applicant's engineer has prepared a trip generation analysis, please provide the following. If not, staff will calculate the trip generation based on the above information. Existing PM Peak Hour Trips (if applicable) _ 0 Proposed PM Peak Hour Trips —Z Net New PM Peak Hour Trips G - CONCURRENCY TEST EXPIRATION FWRC 19.90 It A Concurrency Reserve Certificate (CRC) is valid until the underlying development permit expires, is withdrawn or cancelled, whichever occurs first. In that case, a new concurrency application would be required. ■ A Concurrency Reserve Certificate is valid only for the specific development approval consistent with the development parameters and City file number within the CRC issued. • A Concurrency Reserve Certificate (CRC) runs with the land, and cannot be transferred to a different parcel. I have read the above information regarding expiration deadlines. I further understand that issuance of a concurrency certificate is not a guarantee that the City will issue a development permit or building permit. ��, �X. dw,L'U/1, //_ /_ Z108 Property Owner/Agent Signatur Date SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS — STAFF USE ONLY Permit Submittal: The following items are required for all applications: ❑ Completed and signed Concurrency Application ❑ Concurrency Application Fee paid (See Below) Net New PM Peak Hour Trip Less than 10 10 - 50 51 - 500 Greater than 500+ 2011 Application Fee $344.50 $1,584.50 $3,374.50 $5,576.50 LADEPT\PW\TRA\Concu ncy\CN Template\rinal Template\FW Concurency Application Rev. Ian201 Ldoc C.E.S. NWInc. Civil Engineering & Surveying 5210 12th Street East Fife, WA 98424 Phone: (253) 922-1532 Fax: (253) 922-1954 ceservices@cesnwinc.com www.cesnwinc.com Soundview Manor Vicinity Map - V1 RECEIVED NOV 0 4 2011 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY N CDS Not to Scale CITY OF -- Federal Way PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 33325 8 h Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003-6325 253-835-2700;Fax 253-835-2709 www.ci€ offederalwa .com CONCURRENCy APPLICATION INFORMATION What is a Concurrency Application? The City uses the concurrency application to look at new development's impact on the transportation network. The purpose of the test is to verify if there is adequate capacity in the transportation network and identify possible mitigation for failing intersections. The test uses the City's adopted level of service standards (LOS) as identified in the Comprehensive Plan as a basis for determining whether new development can proceed. Concurrency application is required for all development permits within the city that generate new trips in the PM peak hour, except for development exempt under FWRC 19.90.060 of the Transportation Concurrency Management Ordinance. All new development must pass concurrency test before completing other land use processes. When is a Concurrency Application Required? An application must be submitted concurrent with a development activity permit application that generates one or more PM peak hour trips. The applicant may request a concurrency feasibility analysis at any time. However, since a concurrency feasibility analysis application is not tied to a development permit, a Capacity Reserve Certificate (CRC) will not be issued. What needs to hVubmitted with the Concurrency Application? Completed Concurrency Application WTo scale site plan E� , Vicinitv mat) Er Independent Trip Generation to be considered (if available). All required information in the Concurrency Application must be filled out or the application will be returned. Traffic Division staff will review the completeness of the application and contact the applicant iffurther information is needed. The application will be vested at the time the Concurrency Application is deemed complete. How much is my concurrency permit application fees? And when do I pay this fee? Application fees for the concurrency application will be based on the total new trips the development is estimated to generate. The Public Works Department uses information provided (project size and land use type) in the preapplication application to estimate the number of trips and the appropriate application fee as outlined in Table 1 below. Concurrency permit application fees must be paid concurrent with the underlying land use application submittal. This fee may change if the proposed development is significantly different than the project scope as provided in the preapplication application. At the applicant's discretion, the applicant may hire their own Engineer licensed in the State of Washington to calculate the trip generation. Table 1 - FW Concurrency Application Fee Net New PM Peak Hour Trips Less than 10 10-50 51-500 Greater Than 500 Total Concurrency Application Fee $344.50 $1,584.50 $3,374.50 $5,576.50 (2010 rages) Am I finished with this process after I paid the concurrency permit application fee? No. The concurrency review process is the first phase of your development projects process with the Public Works Department. Once staff has completed the concurrency analysis, the applicant and/or owner will be notified of the result (Pass or Fail). If the project "Passes" the concurrency test, staff will issue a Capacity Reserve Certificate (CRC) allowing the project to proceed to other applicable development permit processes. If the project "Fails" the concurrency test, staff will propose mitigation measure(s) to address the LOS failure at that particular intersection(s). Examples of mitigation measures could be: ■ Construct turn lanes ' Modify or construct a new traffic signal ' Other traffic control measures (such as channelization improvements) The applicant has 30 calendar days to review and response to staff proposed mitigation. Within that period, the applicant must either accept staff recommended mitigation or propose alternative mitigation measures for any LOS failure. Once an agreement has been reached on the mitigation measures, staff will issue a Capacity Reserve Certificate (CRC), allowing the project to proceed with other applicable permit processes. However, if the applicant fails to respond with the 30 days period, a "Denial" letter will be issue and the project will not be approved. If my project fails the concurrency test, what are my options? 1. Accept staff proposed mitigation measure(s), 2. Reduce the size of the development or change the type of uses to reduce the trip generation rate until the standard is met; 3. Delay the application until additional improvements have been identified by the City in the 6-Year (TIP) or constructed by others; 4. Propose appropriate mitigation to include Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures. The proposed mitigation measures shall be constructed and approved concurrent with the development, usually prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Depending on what option is chosen, the applicant may have to restart the concurrency application process again. Can I appeal the Concurrency Denial Notice? Yes. The applicant may appeal the concurrency denial notice as part of the appeal process for the underlying Development Permit application. How long does a Capacity Reserve Certificate last? As long as there is activity on the Development Permit and you do not change the trip generation characteristics of the development (no increase in net new trips is incurred from a change in the project), the CRC Certificate vests the development's new trips for the life of the project. If the project's size changes significantly as determine by the Public Works Department staff, the applicant may need to go through the process again and pay another fee. What if my project changes? Any thing that changes the trip generation rates can generate a need for an amendment to the process, and this process may start over. If the trip generation is greater than 10% of the original estimated trip generated rates the project will require an amendment and the process starts over. Please be conservative and as specific about your project as you can. If you have any questions please ask. What if I do not have a development permit ready for my project? Staff can provide the same level of analysis as a feasibility study for the project. However, the estimated trips generated by the project analyzed will not be reserved or vested. If you decide to proceed with the project, staff will revise the analysis using any transferable data at our hourly rate. Does this mean we will never have to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis? No. The Public Works staff will calculate your trips and identity impacts to the City Transportation system. The following are examples of additional requirements the applicant may need to hire an Engineer to complete: ■ Parking Demand and Utilization ■ Queuing and gap analysis ■ Specialized Land Use and Trip Generation ■ Sight Distance Analysis ■ Neighborhood Traffic Impacts ■ Design of Mitigation Improvements (such as signals, turn lanes, access, or new roads) • Traffic impacts over 100 trips in other peak hours (morning and weekends) What is the Concurrency Permit Process? A flow chart diagram of the process is depicted on the back page. If you have any additional questions, please contact Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer (253) 835-2743 or Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer (253) 835-2740. LADEPT\PW\TRA\Concurrency\CN TemplateTinal Template\Concurency Permit Process Sept 2010.doc CONCURRENCY PERMIT PROCESS (START) - Applicant submit Concurrency application with appropriate fee Staff *performs trip ■- _ - ^ ^ _ _ - tr' _ , ^ ^ _ _ _ _ _ _ - generation/as nt 1 I 1 ` Staff * performs I 1 concurrencv analvsis 1 I 1 PASSED<Re-s>u1t----W IL I I 1 r'- _1 1 I 1 1 l 1 1 I 1 1 Staff *proposes 1 mitigation for failing I 1 1 intersections l I 1 I 1 I 1 I l Staff issues Concurrent y--"" YES — Applicant --^-- accepts NO 1 I Reserve Certificate mitigation? l I I i I I I I Development Staff issues \D Denial letter l t 1 Applicant proposes alternative UP(ermitprocess mitigation * Denotes tasks that may be prepared by the applicant. Staff reviews and approves all applicant -prepared materials. CITY OF ti. Federal Way November 17, 2011 Ms. Lori L. Harvey C.E.S. N.W., Inc. 310 291h St. N.E., Suite 101 Puyallup, WA 98372 Re: 11-104463-00-CN, Soundview Manor - Concurrency Decision CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com The Public Works Traffic Division has completed the concurrency test for the subject project, consisting of 21 Single Family lots. A traffic concurrency test summary is attached for your review. Based on the submitted information, the PW Traffic Division made the following determinations: L� Approved. All intersections impacted by one or more weekday evening peak hour trips from the proposed development would meet the City of Federal Way LOS standards with programmed improvements. A Capacity Reserve Certificate (CRC) for the project is attached. The CRC certificate allows your project to proceed with other applicable permit processes. The CRC is valid until the development permit expires, is withdrawn or canceled whichever occur first. The CRC cannot be sold or transferred to property not included in the legal description provided by the applicant in the application for a CRC. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at (253) 835-2742 or Sarad .Lorigr tt Qitvoffederwa y.com. Sincerely, Sarady Long Senior Transportation Planning gineer SL:mj cc: Project File Day File LADEPT\PWURA\Concurrency\l 1104463_Soundview Manor\Approved CN Determination Letter 16Nov201 Ldoc Co Es So NwInc. Civil Engineering & Surveying November 2, 2011 Cary M. Roe, P.E. Director of Parks, Public Works & Emergency Management 33325 8s' Ave South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 RECEIVED NOV 0 4 1���•� CITY Q r Fa[)FP AL WAY CDs Project: Soundview Manor #07-103109-00-SU (CES #05170.0) Subject: Right Of Way Improvement Modification Request 3t�;c i� �r�>•��r Dear Mr. Roe, 310 29th Street NE, Suite 101 Puyallup,WA 98372 Phone: (253) 848-4282 Fax:(253) 848-4278 Attached please find our fee for $91.50 for a formal Right of Way Modification Request. The preliminary plat of Soundview Manor is required by FWRC 19.135.251 to make a connection to the existing Twin Lakes development at Southwest 3 1 e Street. We are requesting modification to this requirement and in accordance of FIF/RC 19.135.251 which states: Streets shall be provided to develop a street network with a block perimeter of no greater than 2,640 feet, as measured on centerlines This requirement may be modified if connections cannot be made due to: (1) Topographical constraints. (2) Environmentalysensitive areas (3) Adjacent development not being conducive We believe that it is in the best interest for all parties that the modification be allowed for the following reasons: 1. Topographical Constraints. • Steep slopes are present in and around the area of a potential roadway connection. The current configuration of SW Me Street does not meet City of Federal Way's standards for roadway grade. A connection to SW 314th Street would require a tight turning radius. Due to the grade and required turning radius this would create a roadway that would need significant traffic calming devices to insure the safe traffic movement. The vertical differential between the two roadway locations results in a large amounts grading resulting in significant earth movement and native vegetation removal. 2. Environmentally sensitive areas• The site is in a recognized geologically hazardous area as identified by City of Federal Way code. Grades in the area of a potential connection range from 25%-45%. The elimination of the connection enables the project to maintain the integrity of the slopes and existing vegetation. Elimination of a potential roadway connection benefits both the existing and proposed neighborhoods by retaining more open space and native vegetation while maintaining the integrity of the existing slope. It is also important to note that the elimination of the roadway connection significantly reduces the amount of earth work required onsite, thereby minimizing the environmental impact. 3. Adjacent development not being condwdve: In addition to the issues mentioned above the City of Federal Way has forwarded numerous written objections from neighboring property owners expressing their concerns with a roadway connection. The neighbor's had many safety concerns regarding pedestrian interaction with vehicular traffic, the increase in traffic accidents due to the steep roadway grade, sight distances and potential issues from the increase in traffic volumes. It is important to note the revised design incorporates a pathway connection to the adjacent development for community continuity and for school age children to safely walk to and from nearby Twin Lakes Elementary. September25, 2007 SUBJECT: 07-103112-00 CN, Soundview Manor Plat Federal Way, WA Concurrency Decision Attached for your review is the Transportation Concurrency Analysis for the subject project, consisting of 28 Single Family Residence on vacant land. Based on this analysis, Traffic Division staff has made the following determinations: I . Either construct the impacted Transportation Improvement Plan ro'ect list below, Project Map Location Description TTotaIPro-Rata.($) ID ID Design Study, Environmental analysis to 150 1a City Center Access Phase 2 hn rave access to g Center $ 1,167 Add 2nd SB left -turn lane, 3rd SB right- 150 lb City Center Access Phase 3 turn lane $ 1,015 Widen S 320th St bridge over I-5, realign 150 lc Ci Center Access Phase 4 loop ramp and NB off -ram $ 6,873 Add HOV lanes, 2nd SB left -turn lane @ 288th, install raised median, signal @ SR SR 99 HOV Lanes Phase 3: S 509 @ Redondo Wy S with interconnect to 141 2 284th St - SR 509 11th PI S $ 17,536 Add HOV lanes, 2nd NB left -turn lane on SR 99, install raised median, underground 138 3 S 348th St: 9th Ave S - SR 99 utilities $ 3;8,64 Add 2nd NB, WB left -turn lanes, WB right -turn lanes, widen 1st Ave S to 5 lanes 131 4 S 320th St @ 1st Ave S to S 316th St. $ 13.,838 Add HOV lanes, install raised median, 143 6 S 320th St: 8th Ave S - SR 99 underground utilities, illumination $ 23,12D Add WB, SB right -turn lanes, 2nd EB, WB 135 7 S 348th St 1st Ave S left-turnlanes 2,437 IOth Ave SW / SW 344th St: Extend 3-lane collectors, sidewalks, street 146 8 SW Campus Dr - 21st Ave SW lights $ 659 Install raised median, nnprove access at 148 9 1 st Ave S @ S 328th St 328th $ 2,180 139 10 S 320th Sf fl 20th Ave S Add 2nd left -turn lanes EB, WB $ 4,594 Add 2nd left -turn lanes all approaches, WB 11 21st Ave SW @ SW 336th St right -turn lane $ 14,949 159 12 SR 99 HOV Lanes Phase 4: SR 509 - S 312th St Add HOV lanes, install raised median $ 4,1.8$ 13 SR 99 @ S 312th St Add 2nd NB left turn lane $ 2,092 142 14 SW 312th St SR 509 Add EB WB left -turn lanes $ 16,070 Interconnect to 26th Ave SW with the 152 18 SW 320th St 21st Ave SW addition of a 2nd WB left -turn lane $ 15,617 131 19 S 320th St: 1st Ave S - 8th Ave S Add HOV lanes install raised median $ 25 217 167 21 SW 320th St @ 47th Ave SW Install traffic signal $ 807 SW 336th Wy / SW 340th St: $ 1,283 168 23 26th PI SW - Hoyt Rd Widen to 5 lanes Total $ 157,506 or pay pro-rata share mitigation towards this project in the a unit of $157, 506 r You have 14 calendar days from the date of this letter to inform us which of the following Options you will pursue in response. If you fail to respond to this letter within 14 days of the date of this letter, your project will not be approved. Please indicate with a checkmark in the appropriate box of your decision, sign, and date this letter in the space below, and return a copy to us. If you are providing additional information under Options B or C below, these submittals are also due within 14 calendar days from the date of this letter. Once we have reached agreement on the subject project, we will issue a Capacity Reserve Certificate, allowing your project to proceed with other applicable permit processes. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at 253-835-2745 or soma.chattopadhyayCa`lciivaffederaiway.com. Sincerely, Soma Chattopadhyay Traffic/Transportation Engineer OPTIONS: 01"' A. I accept the staff determination for mitigating the transportation impacts of the subject project. ❑ B. I am reducing the trip generation of the subject project by any combination of revised land uses and travel demand management measures. Attached is the revised project description. ❑ C. I am submitting an analysis rebutting the staff analysis and/or provide alternative mitigation measure . Attached is analysis supporting my proposal. ❑ D I will peal the and ing development permit decision. io 9-o'-1 Applicant Date �ECEJVED N y `mot"I `I PUBLIC WORKs DrPARTMENT CITY OF 33325 8"' Avenue South Federal Way CITy, (),F FEDERP L \fVM Federal Way WA 98003-6325 253-835-2700;Fax 253-835-2709 CDSwww.Ci1Vffcdcralway.c0m 2011 TRAFFIC CONCURRENC'Y REVIEW APPLICATION 0-6o5C APPLICATION NO(S) 01'• i D 3 l� -oU-St t Date i d - Y - it Project Name J o o nd V t c Lo H Gz in 0 r Property Address/Location `!Wo bl DL- f, D Pt? i 1n i RCcr Parcel Number(s) Project Description F Of Mel-rl t V t <,1 )Y1 Of' I AND cy + S4-� I'iq Lol S i i' i4-?-)� `2 S S;y1 i PROPERTY OWN KR Nance: C11 1 17: 1�, ��� f L• Phone/Fax: Address: City/State/Zip: Email I 11&vveqlg 0.6.S1UJ li4G 1 U (L11 Cell: Signature: G z Type of Development permit to be applied for: ❑ Commercial ❑ Single Family (SF) ❑ Multifamily (MF) L1 Subdivision ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ None (Feasibility only) ❑ Other Approval for City to perform Concurrency analysis: ❑ Yes d No If NO: Applicant's Traffic Engineer must perform Concurrency analysis consistent with City procedures; however, the application fee remains the same. L:1DCP'RP\VlTRAIConcurreew3ACN Temp1mc\r-al TemplatARV Cnncurelcy Application Rev, 1=201 I.doc Required Inforluation — Application is incomplete and will be returned if not filled out. Gross Square Feet (Commercial) ExistinE k, 1A Proposed Number of Dwelling Units Bxistin Proposed Number of Employees Existing ()- Proposed Parcel size (acres or square footage) Existing Cr .0 Proposed CTO f Has the property previously been reviewed for concurrency? Yes '/ No If yes, date of original application Concurrency Permit No:&7 -10 _-�. il"?_ �b&-CAI Is this an amendment to an existing Concurrency Certificate? Yes Nu � Will the project be phased? i\30 _ - Development Build -Out Year Note: Commercial subdivisions and other projects constructed in phases shall be evaluated for concurrency as each phase is submitted for applicable development permits. Once the concurrency test result has been determined, any changes to the development project require additional review will be billed on an hourly basis. Estimated Number of New Trip Generated by Project per Pre -application Summary: ) - -- If the applicant's engineer has prepared a trip generation analysis, please provide the following. If not, staff will calculate the trip generation based on the above information. Existing PM Peak Hour Trips (if applicable) Proposed PM Peak Hour Trips = Net New PM Peak Hour Trips C4IVCUIrREi+iCY. 7:L+'ST..EXPIRAT10N (I� WRC 19,9M A ConeurrenvyReserve-Ger.Fificate (CYQ'is'valid until the underlying &ir4lopmeni penult xpfre§,.is ►vi[hdrawn 61 ctince)led, whichever•occurs first» 'Ia that case.* a new roncurrencyapj iica[ian would iie:requireci CAhCt?rle]IGY Reserve Cet fieate is valid only.for [he specific:developrxent approval consistent-with%the- dcv�lgprpeqt.laarai�te[ers and;Gi[y file numiier'�xitliin the'CRC issued. _. • A Carteitrreriey Reservc.Cerdi[Cate (CRC) runs with -the land, and canhbt be transfenied.to a different parcel.. I have read the above information regarding expiration deadlines. I further understand that issuance of a concurrency certificate is not a guarantee that the City will issue a development permit or building permit. Property Owner/Agent Signatu Date - - SUI3MI I141 Hls'QUIR>;MEN l S -.:STAFF r r, ONLY . Permit Subniittal: The following items are required for all applications: ❑ Completed and signed Concurrency Application ❑ Concurrency Application Fee paid (See Below) Net New PM Peak Hour Trip Less than 10 10 - 50 51 - 500 Greater than 500+ 2011 Application Fee $344.50 $1,584.50 $3,374.50 $5,576.50 LADL•PM%NTRNComurrencylCK Teny,l.1cTin:d TemphtcT-W Concurency Application Rev. W201 Ldnc CE.i 1. NW111c. Soundview Manor Civil Engioreering X Surveying Phone: (253) 922-1532 Fax: (253) 922-1954 VI; 5210 12th Street East ceserviccs rr cesnwino.com w�vw.cesnwine.com Vicinity Map Fife, WA 98424 N Not to Scale SITE ADDRESS SURVEY BY APPROXIMATELY 4400 BLOCK OF aaWOANY u,0 I1MKil.ITOt;: SW DASH POINT ROAD (SR 509) C.ES NW INC FEDERAL WAY, WA 9B023 CIVIL ENGINEERING h SURVEYING 5210 12TH STREET EAST PARCEL NUMBERS FIFE WA 99424 OFFICE (253) 922-1532 112103-9060 AND 112103-9119 FAX (253) 922-1954 OWNER / DEVELOPER -0 VERTICAL DATUM WESTBROOK INVESTMENTS, LLC NGVD-29 PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 437 29TI STREET NE, SUITE G PUYALLUP, WA 90372 BASIS OF BEARINGS CONTACT: JERRY MAHAN PHONE (253) 841-7000 BASIS OF BEARINGS 15 THE PLAT OF TWIN LAKES NO. 6 SHEET INDEX (REC. NO- 7611230497) PP1 PRELM(ARY PLAT SITE PLAN / COVER SHEET SVi BOUNDARY d TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SV2 TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE EMW GRLO CLEARING AND GRADING PLAN GR1.1 SITE CROSS SECTION GRU SITE CROSS SECTION GRL3 SITE CROSS SECTION C1 SOUNaYic-w DRIVE PLAN 1 P�OFTLEI C2 SW DASH POINt ROAD HALF STREET FRONTAGE BPROVEIENTSI CS CONCEPTUAL RETENTION POND DESIGN IPLAN A PROFBF.1 SW 313TH STREET / "'Fu 1■ / _- [�' Y / ^ nAkl c bN�lA1 / 1/ 29 1 / 11nCM0016 / I7I 11I k FLI FAdFI / VNWE-I+Y41 Ik.5(QAI•/L (RSIs.o)/ 4,13 _ �141�MAD19 SORE M �/ . j1 `. BENCHMARK S O U N D V I E W MANOR SURVEYOR NOTES 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE PLAT OF TWIN LAKES N0. 6 (REC. NO CONCRETE DUMMAAS. THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 11 TWP. 21 N. RGE. 3 E. W,M, 7611230497). CULVERT PDEARNSANITARYTSEWWEERR PUNS A PORTION OF 1 > > 2 COORDINATE SYSTEM IS ASSUMED. BAY No. 1 PROVIDED BY LAKEHAVEN UTRITY DISTRICT. ELEVATION = 126A CITY OF FEDERAL WAY KING COUNTY WASHINGTON 3. METHOD AND DATE OF MONUMENT LOCATION: FIELD TRAVERSE IN NGVD 1929 PER LAKEHAVEN URUTY DISTRICT. NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2005. UTILITIES PUBLIC SERVICES 4. EQUIPMENT USED: GEODIMEIER 608 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 6. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW EASEMENTS OF WATER: TACOMA WATER FIRE DEPARTMENT: SOUTH KING FIRE AND RESCUE RECORD, EXCEPT AS SHOWN. PARCEL A: POWER: PUGET SOUND ENERGY POLICE DEPARTMENT: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 7. VERDCAt OROM FM1B= LOEECBEIE COLWERf PER THE NORTH 132 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST WARIER OF THE NORTHEAST SEWER: LAKEHAVEN UTIUTY DISTRICT SCHOOL DISTRICT: FEDERAL WAY PUBUC SCHOOLS SANITARY L�FWE•R PLANSDHFOR ONAS BAY N0. I 9Y QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 21 TELEPHONE OWEST COMMUNICATIONS MASS TRANSIT: METRO , MGMoym LAKEHAVEN UTiSTY DISTRICT. ELEYATk1 • 12&8. Nf1T1 192E PER NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. CABLE TELEVISION: COMCAST LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT. PARCEL B: GAS PUGET SOUND ENERGY 8. COMMITMENT FORPA TINE INSURANCE lSED WAS PR{PARFD 8Y _ TICOR TITLE C0MPA4Y, N0. 6356758-I DATED AULXST 9, 2005 AT THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF 8: M AM. THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 3 ROD TCV t01RR or s0cm F]RKN EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. LYING SOUTH OF MARINE VIEW N� AEI Sk � 1 1 - DRIVE AND EAST OF F.B. HOYT ROM; MAZ MIA. x1R L61MF 9mm _ 6K 111W EXCEPT THE WEST BUD FEET THEREOF, AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR - STATE ROUTE SR 509 BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 9305172027. - - - �" T Starr / WtkD r KMV 2AFAFP sIl(4L-f"v AF50DObi TIM5.0) / / f1�T''y. / - • AL� IpkIMOC ChSEH NT !� 1taA1F I AHER EI S Ha 6 / T WIDTH UNKOWN SINGLE-FAMILYDEVELI r - 0 snlaT. APLr � YF ILIDD S.F. FCY142.00.0� �j / i4I T 1 (sa 41) 2 5 LAAli1 PAIN � 11K LOCATIONS OF UNDERCRONO URNIE5 AS 91Q'AN HEREON ARE 8A3D ON AITOIE GROUND SU16ACE FEARTIES A� ANY BRAVO PROVIDED 70 THE SURVEYOR. LOCATIONS OF UMDUMMUNO UBUTICS MAY VARY EROM LOCATILWS `JgTIT1 HFREO!f, ADDITIONAL BUM UTilfE5I57RUCTVRES PAY ANO/QR DO MT. 16L]O tEIE Cf1F4RUIE ALN A M Fop SW" PONT ROAD WAS XSNFD ([,NO R...TOH PRggw N KOM OF UR EY NO. 750722O45A. W. PUNT OF CURVATURE SHM ROM WAS ESTA015HED V5N0 WORMAIM PROVIDED N WAWHNGIW STATE OFPA4T4Nr OF '(R►NI�ORtAT1OI ROAD PLA4 MIRED 'SR 509 FUME COUNTY NNE ID PSH NG 1 KNB COUNTY Us 8- -87 11. THE LOCATION AT THE PROPOO SANITARY SEWER EASEWIT IS BASED IN AL1WOENTS PROVIDED W PLAYS FROM THE L KEHAVEM UTILITY DISTRICT A181 THE PLAT OF DUMAS BAY NO. 2 THERE WAS NO DOCIMOTA'DOV PMW FOR AN EA NETT Dwr FOR AGREEMENTS WITH THE DISTRCT or RECORD "m CO NOT SPECUY AN EXACT IDIOT L THE LOCATION Q�F 8E EASE OT 6 AS&WO TO BE WHERE 8E FALTUITS ARE CVf THE LROUND MA WE AHasYmT A10F/OR MTN FOR 7T1EE EASOR IT W ➢ PROBABLY BE�Ii00 u R( AM EAMANT DDCUWW TO MATCH RE ASSIPLT LOCATION. Ix. TIE I'll, ROOD RUTS *4 SI) EAS MY FROM STY O % PONT ROAD APPEARS TD BE THE DDRE3RME OT A PFIIPEAW. NON-F70CLUSIV� ROAD EASES@Ri WAfH A NDT TO DI ID 40 FOOT TAOiIi PER EASFAEOT RECORDED A"m REC. NET. 44mm yy17s7A- 1•A1.77 TRACT A wA _ _ J uwmm / i.,]lA1' t I 1 �.. Q rc-1II&OO , / � / FCwl66.O�t6 IF. RADIUS P.11w ST. iYIW LAKES N0. e VO10I, P[S. a2-aa f t yess+rN --- -% � .�.: ¢ L - , - -Aa73,99m3o !MNG CWNtt J I ►�KIM lmw� qww- _ ..I SNP-F-FFAWLYRRESDOCIAL(RSI.2)1 I r ussw LA .i / FI �' mpi-FWLr aATa /E 19 FGbf73.D0 : gyp` I F6e17LOpD $ _ f REWDENTIk (M1}I L 47615 1DA1I -1:- EAST I I L flUNI r-FF RD'_NLOP➢EµD 1Y TUNDEM101'ED OFAD EDDNL 9NTE-FAMLY SF. I ! RESIDENTIAL 1 11 I },r1C 5F I�YIBQ.BQ + �. r E UNE x 6]lT. 1 k Y ( ) - - '��CAy.Mr - �l L. - �. 1t - r N sW1 I 1 II - - ; ` T - J '° SITE STATISTICAL BREAK DOWN I TdACT'B �- - J e�7aµRgwwSWAN 1 I W�jLAND . 17 $ i J TRACT F SINGLE-FnuILY REsoD nAL (Rn.2) SWUIZTk5mlf7f [PUNT oE5 Ci AnoFt %W-FAE LY HIO -D NSITr ) NiUFFfR ale 9a,7sr, �i7° I I u xkjj CPFA SPACE I / ' sI1E AaEIL Lft M FT. (MIA �AM)ss FTr164. -1) / M �r RffDfm VACANT 22V7: s(L Fr. M1(t ACR!N I /TRACT £'- I ! = - -7 r ALLOWABLE LOT AREA: 9,600 SD. FT. (ARE) ir �PENA f 18 G (yyno / _ '~ ALLOWABLE LOT FRONTAGE 3o FEET W) FIA1d + &IN SI: _ 61 RL ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT 3O' AN* MENACE BUILDING ELEVATION W .IIH 1�` R1I 6N I� f SRC REIN MN [1P t 41,1 + f - 4G% SA- -rf p171�s935g Jam, � �iA Nu +.--- rCVW r A JAM t PARKING REWIRED: 2 PARKING SPACES (MIN) d' Y AtlDO P*5I 41�1IF pA5A1rE 420' 1 _ - _fir- -'1 I 'S01' I FRONT YARD SETBACK: 20 FEET LS N�Ia' b.fl _ i/IK - 5Mi-FAv[T KSOENAAL Z✓4t7j A (p. ✓rt + % r T RIONT-OF-WAY - SIDE YARD SETBACK: 5 FEET ��p / REAR YARD SETBACK: 5 FEET s, - 7;ff R• 11rJ t97,00 / 1 : s'::: 58 F 1 rr LOTS TOTAL LOTS LOTRAREA: 9.603 SO. FT. - -_-- / / •'tea-e.r �C--�-- �,�, LARGEST LOT AREA: 15,327 50. FT. � J'1H]aYmd6 iC 1kI�wl�Yss Ls ) .f� �• ►_� - - - - - Ln wwu 'k I ` T AVEN ERAGE LOT AREn I2,3H =/W �eutu, M4YWA6 S: / �11A1m IM10/Woox' N �_ //! r 1 ' wm t PROECIED TRAFFIC FLOW: 21011E W TRIPS/DAY k BE1iNLY A I 5'fiIT]Y[ L7X 14 ,� li+`ZOo-00 / y + 9.7LaAAW �nRa RIP / / 1 _ , J a I PROPOSED PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY 29,870 50. FT. (0.691 ACRES) ./ DWI-IAIgt pE9LOTaµ (�� !r i � � � f Firlli9.`AJ F�199.50 \ R PARCEL 11 _ I EXISTING IMPERWOUS SURFACE 6,699 SQ. FF. (0.161 AM) - \ PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 79,s45 SO. FT. (I.L2k 9M) I861I s<. Yf I \ (ONSITE PAVEMENT/CONCRETE) II rl• GRAPHIC SCALE Y>, ( IN FEW 1 inch = 60 FL ENISTI1G EP - -30-�/ mar. THY it 1 �! F.r B R>kJR 37 TRACT'A' - STORM 11,825 SQ. Fi.fy`u271 ACRES] WT CA h I PF"R N (Y�ElE 'F. 1 TRACT'B' - WETA BUFFER 20,264 SO. FT, 0.O04i1 ACHES]- BUFFER 5.16% PALTRE➢GFNIIAL (RSA 2) I L �L - - - \ TRACT'C - LANDSCAPE Z915 SO. FT. [ � - USEABLE 008X S tlri N I>r� - - „�R7i� - _ TRACT'6 -LANDSCAPE IBIS St FF..OATS USEABLE O07X I 1gl1A k CAR me x Ill K 1K W. E/. ''�'+dALDt TRACT'E' - OPEN SPACE 4p0E5 5O Ft. [OS2H: ACRES) - COI,'STRARYD 10.19x 1121T 5lwmc IST TRACT 'F - OPEN SPACE 62,416 SO. FT. (1,43A AIDES) - USEABLE 1590% W HaE-FAMILY REWDENRAL (Rsrx) FEDERAL WAY PUBOC SLHODIS 1 - 112I039D95 FEDERAL uY PL91C SDI0015 I \ I 9ND1E-FAIRY RE!;(MA) IO19>7T�2 fPF/I �AL'F PA7E6DRY PRDECF mTALs. CATEGORY R[au1Hs11 15R YN. SINGE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. (RS7.2� USEABLE I 10% MIN. E 16.05% BUFFER ON i 2X MAX DICE 5.106MX - / CONSTRAINED I 2% MAX il.lpia I / OPEN SPACE TOTAL 31.40X VICINITY MAP NT.S. LEGEND PROPOSED PROPERTYAOT LINE EASEMENT NNE ROAD CENRAIfE EDGES OF PAVING/CURB LINE CONTOUR LINE STORK DRAIN CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STOflM DRAIN NNE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER LINE CLEAN OUT WATER VALVE WATER FIRE HYDRANT WATER MAN LINE ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE ROOF DRAIN LNE ROCKERY GAS METER WATER METER POWER TRANSFORMER ELECTRIC BOIL FLUSH TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX SOW LIGHT GAS VALVE U11M POLE GUY ANCHOR TELEPHONE RISER SIGN (AS NOTED) SECURITY LIGHT TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE MONUMENT N CASE POWER VAULT CHAIN UNIX FENCE SECTION LINE WOOD FENCE RETAINING WALL W ca>- cc W J 00 Z C� a LI! az -j O J a C) ul Whug Ix y Lug T 21 S a F � J a ch z >. Y a O Lr y O uiZ0 &� DO W W W F CC x 3 w d y CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG _ 1-800-424-5555 a Designed: JPW CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Drawn: JPW PRECONSTRUCTION/INSPECTION Checked: CAD TEL. No. 12531 835-2700 Scale: V = so, PERMIT NO. D.te: 04101P IO Job No: 05170.0 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Sh- No:: APPROVED SY: PIN DATE 1 of 10 SheltS E ■ 9 EARTHWORK QUANTITIES 159,DOB CY CHIT, ±23,000 CY FILL NET = ±36,000 CY CUT QUANTITIES ARE FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALCULATE QUANTITIES FOR BID PURPOSES CIT � .Federal Way PUBLIC WORKS 13FPARTMF,NT 33325 Oi Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003-6325 253-835-2700;Fax 253-835-2709 NvW.W 1ynrrederaIway.enne CONCURRENCy APPLICATION INFORMATION What is a Concurrency Application? The City uses the concurrency application to look at new development's impact on the transportation network. The purpose of the test is to verify if there is adequate capacity in the transportation network and identify possible mitigation for failing intersections. The test uses the City's adopted level of service standards (LO5) as identified in the Comprehensive Plan as a basis for determining whether new development can proceed. Concurrency application is required for all development permits within the city that generate new trips in. the PM peak !tour, except for development exempt under FWRC 19.90.060 of the Transportation Concurrency Management Ordinance. All new development must pass concurrency test before completing other land use processes. When is a Concurrency Application Required? An application must be submitted concurrent with a development activity permit application that generates one or more PM peak hour- trips. The applicant may request a concurrency feasibility analysis at any time. However, since a concurrency feasibility analysis application is not tied to a development permit, a Capacity Reserve Certificate (CRC) will not be issued. What needs to bc�ubmitted with the Concurrency Application? © Completed Concurrency Application To scale site plan E5 Vicinity trap ©� Independent Trip Generation to be considered (if available). All required information in the Concurrency Application must be filled out or the application will be returned. Traffic Division .staff will review the completeness of the application and contact the applicant iff raher information is needed. The application will be vested at the time the Concurrency Application is deenxd complete_ How much is my concurrency permit application fees? And when do I pay this fee? Application fees for the concurrency application will be based on the total new trips the development is estimated to generate. The Public Works Department uses information provided (project size and land use type) in the preapplication application to estimate the number of trips and the appropriate application fee as outlined in Table 1 below. Concurrency permit application fees must be paid concurrent with the underlying land use application submittal. This fee may change if the proposed development is significantly different than the project scope as provided in the preapplication application. At the applicant's discretion, the applicant may hire their own Engineer licensed in the State of Washington to calculate the trip generation. Table 1- FW Concurrency Application Fee Net New PM Peak Hour Trips I Less than 10 10-50 51-500 Greater Than 500 Total Concurrency Application Fee I $344.50 $1,584.50 $3,374.50 $5,576.50 (2010 rates) Am I finished with this process after I paid the concurrency permit application fee? No. The concurrency review process is the first phase of your development project's process with the Public Works Department. Once staff has completed the concurrency analysis, the applicant and/or owner will be notified of the result (Pass or Fail). If the project "Passes" the concurrency test, staff will issue a Capacity Reserve Certificate (CRC) allowing the project to proceed to other applicable development permit processes. If the project "Fails" the concurrency test, staff will propose mitigation measurc(s) to address the LOS failure at that particular intersection(s). Examples of mitigation measures could be: ■ Construct turn lanes Modify or construct a new traffic signal ■ Other traffic control measures (such as channelization improvements) The applicant has 30 calendar days to review and response to staff proposed mitigation. Within that period, the applicant must cither accept staff recommended mitigation or propose alternative mitigation measures for any LOS failure. Once an agreement has been reached on the mitigation measures, staff will issue a Capacity Reserve Certificate (CRC), allowing the project to proceed with other applicable permit processes. However, if the applicant fails to respond with the 30 days period, a "Denial" letter will be issue and the project will not be approved. If my project fails the concurrency test, what are my options? 1 _ Accept staff proposed mitigation measure(s), 2. Reduce the size of the development or change the type of uses to reduce the trip generation rate until the standard is met.; 3. Delay the application until additional improvements have been identified by the City in the 6-Year (TIP) or constructed by others; 4. Propose appropriate mitigation to include Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures. The proposed mitigation measures shall be constructed and approved concurrent with the development, usually prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Depending on what option is chosen, the applicant nra_v have to restart the concurrency application process again. Can I appeal the Concurrency Denial Notice? Yes. The applicant may appeal the concurrency denial notice as part of the appeal process for the underlying Development Permit application. How long does a Capacity Reserve Certificate last? As long as there is activity on the Development Permit and you do not change the trip generation characteristics of the development (no increase in net new trips is incurred from a change in die project), the CRC Certificate vests the development's new trips for the life of the project. If the project's size changes significantly as determine by the Public Works Department staff, the applicant may need to go through the process again and pay another fee. What if my project changes? Any thing that changes the trip generation rates can generate a need for an amendment to the process, and this process may start over. If the trip generation is greater than 10% of the original estimated trip generated rates the project will require an amendment and the process starts over. Please be conservative and as specific about your project as you can. If you have any questions please ask. What if I do not have a development permit ready for my project? Staff can provide the same level of analysis as a feasibility study for the project. However, the estimated trips generated by the project analyzed will not be reserved or vested. If you decide to proceed with the project, staff will revise the analysis using any transferable data at our hourly rate. Does this mean we will never have to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis? No. The Public Works staff will calculate your trips and identity impacts to the City Transportation system. The following are examples of additional requirements the applicant may need to hire an Engineer to complete: • Parking Demand and Utilization • Queuing and gap analysis • Specialized Land Use and Trip Generation • Sight Distance Analysis • Neighborhood Traffic Impacts • Design of Mitigation Improvements (such as signals, turn lanes, access, or new roads) • Traffic impacts over 100 trips in other peak hours (morning and weekends) What is the Concurrency Permit Process? A flow chart diagram of the process is depicted on the back page. If you have any additional questions, please contact Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer (253) 835-2743 or Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer (253) 835-2740. LADEPT\PW\TRA\Concurrency\CN Template\Final Template\Concurency Pennit Procesr. Sept 2010.doc CONCURRENCY PERMIT PROCESS (START) - Applicant submit Concurreucy application with appropriate fee Staff*perFnrntsirip 4-------------_ __—__ — -' gencralion/assignmcnl t i Staff * performs l I concurrencv unalvsis I I 1 I f P ASSM Concurrency FAIL i Result t s t i t t i t i ! t 1 Staff *proposes t mitigatitnt for raifing t l I intcrsectirnls I t I I I I 1 Staff issues Concunene yt" YtiS — Applicant NO — — ` — '— — — — — — accepts t ! Reserve Certificate ntitigatHen't [ [ f I l I [ I I To Development Applicant NO e LStaff issues proposes I I — �I Permit process Denial letter mitigation x Denotes tasks that inay be prepared by the applicant. Staff reviews and approves all applicant -prepared materials. CITY OF Public Works Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal WayFederal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY TEST SUMMARY APPLICATION (NO(S): 11-104463-00-CN Date: November 16, 2011 Project Name Soundview Manor Property Address/Location Parcel Number(s) 112103-9060, 112103-9119 Project Description Subdivision of two lots into 21 SF lots Based on the traffic distribution, intersections impacted by at least one or more evening peak hour trips were analyzed for meeting concurrency LOS standards (v/c less than 1.0 with LOS E) consistent with the City of Federal Way Transportation Concurrency Management code as described in FWRC 19.90. Table 1 below shows a summary of the LOS analysis for the study intersections with V/C ratio above 0.65 at the anticipated build -out year. Where a performance measure does not apply to the entire intersection, the table shows the measure for the worst movement of the intersection. For all other study intersections and detailed LOS calculation, please contact the Public Works Traffic Division. Note: Anv chap es to the develop ment proiect that req wire add itiona! review will be billed Qn an hourly has Table 1: Concurrency Level of Service (LOS) Intersection 2013 Background LOS 2013 With -Project I LOS Conditions • Standard Conditions !Standard ED North -South Street East-West Street LOS I V/C Met? LOS V/C 1 Met? 2546 8 Av S S 312 St __ A 0.67 = Y A j 0.67 V _.�.____------------------ _ _ i-- __.. , _. --- - ,- _------ i ---- -- 2550 Pacific Hwy S S 312 St �____ C 0.65 —Y C 0.65 3028 21 Avg SW 320 St D _ _ 0.74 Y D 0.74 _ _ 3040 i 1 Av S S 320 St C _ 0.83 _ Y C 0.83 ' --Y 3046 18 Av S �S 320 St _- -� A 066-, _-Y ?_—_ 0066 _ Y .3048 l 11 PI S S 320 St C 0.81 Y _____ C _-0.81 -wV 3050 tPacific Hwy S l S 320 St _ — ~D 0.69-Y — D �0.69 i _ Y _ 3052- 20 Av S ��_ S 320 St D J--0.64�-- Y D 0.64 _Y 3055 -123 Av S_ __S 320 St D y —0.91 1_ _Y D - 0.91 Y 3057 iI-5 SB Ram � _ S 320 St m C E 0.7 Y C _ -0.7— Y - -- --- -- --------y-75 S1- Ra -p— -- ------ —�-- --- ------ ----- ---- ------ -- ._ ._ � - -------- ------ — _ ... 4028 121 Av SW E S W Campus Dr� _ C —� j _.M0.69_Y _ _C _ -i0.69 ! Y 4029 19 Av SW _SW C�us Dr— _ C - y _ 0.89- Y �_.. — C 0.89_ Y 4132 SW Campus Dr — 10 Av SW-C 0.86 1 V_ 4218 Ho Rd SW _ SW 340 St -C 1 0.65 Y C � _0.65 i Y ------I..- . . .. ... ......___ _ - -y. _.__. 4840 11 Av S_ — _ ]S 348 St _ - W C 0_ .78 w _ Y_ -- _ C _— _ 0.78 I Y ---------- ------------ 4846 '?.Av S lS 348 St C 0.77 Y ___-__ C_____'---•0.77 Y All intersections met the City of Federal Way LOS standards: Yes 1'es For Staff Use Only: Concurrencv Test Result: Passed: Fail: If "Fail", identify intersections and possible mitigation: Concurrency Test performed by: Sarady Lon Date W 0 L:\DEPT\PW\TRA\Concurrency\l1104463_Soundview Manor\Traffic Concurrency Test LOS Summary.As 1/1 m m H m m m i w Z S H 7u 7u v1 z 'C o z z£ H H n u 0 ;n n n m w 7v d° c r o w 0m n ro x n O w x C (D m (D (D H m > rt (D I C v V P- H H r a w > 0 0 ,O rt a m ro O C rt C �O w O (D N N• rt rt N H- rt p- (n p- p- p- n N a w P- rt I-` N rt P. P. O rt rt N 7 (D G a rt n E rt C w H a H (D rt (D a N rt (D W H- H F-' I P. H tr c t" Q Q 10 O v H 5 r lD •J 7 Id 'O O' tr N 3 o b IT r- •J 4•- m N N w w N M w w rt (D(D r a 5 (D rt M rt C7 (D H H r- r- rt w n w N- O C N- m 0 H- rt H rt rt $ (D o (D N O N n n w P. P. (D H (D (D P- (D a ,Q c z r w n o w m J C •J H H CY CY rt r r n n O C r- C7 C7 H N rt lG It ,Q (D o%- W a tY tr z Cn — n N 0 `C l< O O rt P' n 70 w N (D z E H (D z H H> `G 'G C7 •J ,v (D n w w '0 (n rt w 'A O m N (D LQ rt rt w (D (D n J H a w H E (D H H- H C m rt `C E H '77 H- (D ,n w H (D •J C rt w rt rt HP.N T1 H H H 10 N w C rt O v ,u a (D w (D Z r w rt O O > (D w w ro 7 7 F+- H (n IQ rt C P. o m ;a 10 IQ N o rt (D (D 5- ((DD 0 C N 7 J J It a (D rt •J N- •J b m N N b cn z 5 W H H 0 0 N N m IQ W m z a n N a ,-j m w N) O w m w J w N ID UI O O O 0 0 O O �-+ W O O O N O F'- ((DD ~ Cn 61 F-` d° N 01 r 4� 61 F-` O r r c (n o W N C ZG Z Z z Z Z > O O O w lD a> lD Ol a\ H O O O tJ O O O rt y O J w o J w O o 0 o K z o o (HD N m w � m r Ma .� m H z o 0 0 > o o (D Q• n Z c D O H z z z z z z z m o 0 o cv O 5' > � O O O o o k~ r N O r N C O O O K z O O o J D J O J D J 0 0 0 0 0 >L n N m O O O cb o> > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o K z o 0 0 0 0 > o 0 Md w m m K 7tl fD m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m n C O n 7 C n 7 7 O 7 n 7 n 7 7 n 7 C rt rt rt rt rt rt rt It rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt m w w w m m w m m w w m m w w m w w m H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H �C K K rt rr rt to rt rt rt rt rt z z 10 H H H to a D (D :r > 7 O 7r ? 7 7 O' C C C' H P- a N N (D w (D a w w (D (D w tr 00' 7 (aD m ((DD Q. O O n n 0 H Vl ,'d ro w to (D (D rt 'O t' O H H O O O H- rt w (D H. O H H P- (D a ro c H (D C (D rt a rt H �Q £ rt 7 5 (D N Z Z M (nM 7r n (D 0 7 (D O 0 'C a a H (D t4 O O M rt M a (D (D N FtM (D H. 4 P. w r- r- w � N rt O C (Z: 0 C n 5 n n H rt rt 0 w M rt N a rt N rt N a IQ O d rt c H C w P- 7 O C t•( 0 (D w rt r a 7 w n O rt M rt P-(D rt w `G P- a H 0 7 0 C O a N- (D (D N- a O rt O (DP. M ro 7 N '0 w (D M a w ro 0 IQ (D Cr (D H rt H 0 P. 5 r C rt P. H N- 7 0 a w w (D 70 F+- 7 rt w (D H .Q (D H n 'CI rt rt t! a rt rt rt w 0 o, ma C P. P. H H n o w O 0 P. N rt rt H- H C 7 a (D .7• (D 7 p- tf - (D H rt a r r• N tY (D 'a w 7 r Ia IQ w 0 rt M P. (D rt I :r It r m 7r O (D W (n w P- (D H rt .Q P. (D C It It w tr w N- o a A.L. - kok i Z � 7e MS aw Wit ] !T m rl _. LA rrj. ram` 4• rn 4.-_ O z O � Iri Z � C] m °'4 Awe q!� W m z z W Awe 5 . N a I'h 2 iz I., _ z cr rn o .. may$ m 0 cOlt � , y, x PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way P9 Box 9718 Federal Way WA 8063-9718 on 253-835-2700;Fax 253-835-2709 wleder0lway.com CAPA CITY RESER VE CERTIFICATE (CAA This CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION is made this LZtday of November 2011, by the City of Federal Way (COFW), a political subdivision of the State of Washington (hereinafter called the "City"). WHEREAS, the developer intends to develop the property described as Soundview Manor reviewed under City file CN Number(s)11-104463-00-CN (hereinafter called the "development"); and WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A requires that the City adopt and enforce ordinances which prohibit development approval if the development causes the level of service on a transportation facility to decline below the standards adopted in the comprehensive plan, unless transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of the development are made concurrent with the development; and WHEREAS, the City adopted its comprehensive plan in November 1995; and WHEREAS, Chapter 19 of the COFW Revised Code was amended by the creation of Chapter 19.90 Division III on June 10, 2006 by Ordinance 06-525 effective January 1, 2007; and NOW, THEREFORE, a concurrency certificate is issued for the development of 21 Sinede FUM111 lots based on the facts and conditions set forth herein. Development Parameters This CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION is based on the following development: Development type: Residential Single Family Development size: 21 Lots Property address: N/A Federal Way, WA Parcel No. (s): 112103 9060, 112103 9119 Number of New PM Peak Hour Vehicles Trips Generated: 26 Validity of Coneurrency Determination This CAPACITY RESERVE CERTIFICATE is valid only for the specific development approval consistent with the development parameters and the City file number contained within this certificate. If the development is changed, expired, cancelled or withdrawn, it will be subjected to reevaluation for concurrency purposes. Terms of the Capacity Reserve Certificate This CAPACITY RESERVE CERTIFICATE is valid until the underlying development permit expires, is withdrawn or cancelled, whichever occurs first. Approved By: Date: 17 /�o ✓e ln�4' 0211 a Printed Name: Richard A. Perez. RE — Title: City Traffic Upineer SITE ADDRESS SURVEY BY GRAPHIC SCALE BENCHMARKSOUNDVIEW MANORSURVEYOR NOTES t RACK (1F RFARINIrC IC TNF PI AT r1F TWINI I AIIFC NIn R (RFC Nin VERTICAL DATUM: NORTH END OF 18" CONCRETE 7611230497). CULVERT PER SANITARY SEWER PLANS FOR DUMAS A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 11, TWP, 21 N■, RGE■ 3 E■, W■■, 2 COORDINATE SYSTEM IS ASSUMED. BAY NO. 1 PROVIDED BY LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT. ELEVATION = 126.9. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY KING COUNTY WASHINGTON NGVD 1929 PER LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT. , , 3. METHOD AND DATE OF MONUMENT LOCATION: FIELD TRAVERSE IN NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2005. LEGAL DESCRIPTION UTILITIES PUBLIC SERVICES 4. EQUIPMENT USED: GEODIMETER 608 PARCEL A: WATER: TACOMA WATER FIRE DEPARTMENT: SOUTH KING FIRE AND RESCUE 6. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW EASEMENTS OF POWER: PUGET SOUND ENERGY POLICE DEPARTMENT: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY RECORD, EXCEPT AS SHOWN. THE NORTH 132 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST SEWER: LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT SCHOOL DISTRICT: FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS - 7. VERTICAL DATUM: NORTH END OF 18" CONCRETE CULVERT PER QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 21 TELEPHONE: QWEST COMMUNICATIONS MASS TRANSIT: METRO / SANITARY SEWER PLANS FOR DUMAS BAY NO. 1 PROVIDED BY NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT. ELEVATION = 126.9. NGVD 1929 PER CABLE TELEVISION: COMCAST LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT. PARCEL B: GAS: PUGET SOUND ENERGY 8. COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE USED WAS PREPARED BY THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF -� 11COR TITLE COMPANY, NO. 6356758-2, DATED AUGUST 9, 2005 AT THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 3 HELD FOR CENTER OF SECTION POSITION _ 8:00 AM. EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTH OF MARINE VIEW FOUND ENCASED 3"X3" CONCRETE '`� 9. THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN HEREON DRIVE AND EAST OF F.B. HOYT ROAD; MONUMENT WITH 1/2" BRASS NAIL ARE BASED ON ABOVE GROUND SURFACE FEATURES AND ANY WITH LARGE PUNCH - 0.8' DOWN / DRAWINGS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR. LOCATIONS OF EXCEPT THE WEST 600 FEET THEREOF; AND / / "' UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY VARY FROM LOCATIONS SHOWN - - - - - - _� - HEREON. ADDITIONAL BURIED UTILITIES/STRUCTURES MAY AND/OR EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR / \ - - - _ DO EXIST. STATE ROUTE SR 509 BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY "/ 10. THE CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT FORSW DASH POINT ROAD WAS wSot 653 RECORDING NUMBER 9306172027. / I INFORMATION PROVIDED IN RECORD OF SURVEY . 51.87' ESTABLISHED USING :..:::::. ... .::./ N0. 7507220464. THE POINT OF CURVATURE SHOWN HEREON WAS y I / / y ESTABLISHED USING INFORMATION PROVIDED IN WASHINGTON ST.aTE 1121039132 I / DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROAD PLAN EN TITLEQ SR 509 RONALD & SHELLY ZAFFINO / r'� d PIERCE COUNTY LINE TO PSH NO. 1 KING COUNTY" DATED 8-21-87. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS15.0) T A / ::>:::>;>::: ��° DRAINAGE EASEMENT /2d WATER 11. THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT iS / i E / S EASEMENT PER ALIGNMENTS PR VI IN PLANS FROM THE LAKEHAVEN 0 BASED ON PROVIDED >?<>?:�✓" P F TWIN ♦ PER PLAT O 6 ........................ / %»»':r: �0�� _ PLAT OF TWIN K No. s U1LITY DISTRICT AND THE PLAT OF DUMAS BAY NO. 2. THERE WAS :<>r;S LAKES i 3:.:;?;:.: LAKES NO. / ES 1 i WN / � WIDTH UNKO NTATION PROVIDED FOR AN EASEMENT EXCEPT FOR NO DOCUME E E S F �� \ ............. A ♦ 9�5 W AGREEMENTS WITH THE DISTRICT OF RECORD WHICH DO NOT SPECIFY DEVELOPED / /� :.::. s ♦ ti, U) / ;;;;;>:`. ... .. �' 6�� AN EXACT WIDTH. THE LOCATION OF THE EASEMENT IS ASSUMED TO / SINGLE-FAMILY Q� SR / 8731990280 /p i I :::.-::: � RESIDENTIAL I GARY L. & JUDITH C. ADAMS BE WHERE THE FACILITIES ARE ON IN THE GROUND AND 111E c3 / >::::: // Q 29 .............. N SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ALIGNMENT AND/OR WIDTH FOR THE EASEMENT SHOULD PROBABLY ........................ I / 08') '� ♦ �Q� 8731990290 / (RS7.2) BE MODIFIED IN AN EASEMENT DOCUMENT TO MATCH THE ASBUILT --� �c HAROLD E. RANSOM LOCATION P a APPROXIMATELY 4400 BLOCK OF SW DASH POINT ROAD (SR 509) FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 PARCEL NUMBERS 112103-9060 AND 112103-9119 OWNER / DEVELOPER WESTBROOK INVESTMENTS, LLC 437 29TH STREET NE, SUITE G PUYALLUP, WA 98372 CONTACT: JERRY MAHAN PHONE (253) 841-7000 BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC: C.E.S. NW INC CIVIL ENGINEERING & SURVEYING 5210 12TH STREET EAST FIFE, WA 98424 OFFICE (253) 922-1532 FAX (253) 922-1954 VERTICAL DATUM NGVD-29 PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BASIS OF BEARINGS BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE PLAT OF SHEET INDEX (Kt(. NU. /bl lLJU4y/ j PP1 PRELIMINARY PLAT SITE PLAN / COVER SHEET SVi BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SV2 TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE EXHIBIT GR1.0 CLEARING AND GRADING PLAN GR1.1 SITE CROSS SECTION GR1.2 SITE CROSS SECTION GR1.3 SITE CROSS SECTION !PLAN FILET C1 SOUNDVIEW DRIVE & PR 0 C2 SW DASH POINT ROAD IHALF STREET FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS) C3 CONCEPTUAL RETENTION POND DESIGN (PLAN & PROFILE) SW 313TH STREET oa / N (156. 4 J�/SINGLE-FAMILY 1121039016 B�SSsr6?9, O. /�Q' MARTIN & KIMBERLY FREET / �\1 R SIDENTIAL RS 5 0E) 8 ( qS6 J 0�` / FOUND EMPTY MONUMENT CASE / •'� ..:. WITH PK NAILS AT 2'X2' OFFSETS ""'` .. - SET HUB & TACK THAT WAS /y '' i>st:>ss .� HELD FOR E W ALIGNMENT OF ROAD o / / {.; :<:;:.:.:; ::'.. ;: " STORM 11 R99i C F :✓ t�/ , a 28 10"ORNER SINGLE-FAMILY d I $. ..........� A 0 / SETBACK (TYP) �, I RESIDENTIAL (RS7.2) 12, THE DIRT ROAD RUNNING SOUTHEASTERLY FROM SW DASH POINT o 9• •; � � , E o-37'57'56" ROAD APPEARS TO BE THE CENTERLINE OF A PERPETUAL, 0 :::...:...:......:............................... 0 (375848) NON-EXCLUSIVE ROAD EASEMENT WITH A NOT TO EXCEED 60 FOOT 6 6 , 6 6 / R=100.0' _.........::.::.:::...,.,�,<,..,,,,,,I ♦ � / I\ WIDTH PER EASEMENT RECORDED UNDER RED. N0. 4499950. Ad ♦ =23.18/ 1 / L 09'DO 11,100 S.F. / R=2 FG=142.00 / �1 �A < , L=66.26 (66.29 ) T=34.40' S88'43'07"E 50.25' (50.4l') sso• �s F?o6s s4 of tr�[muvi N I / z: v q 9,815 S.F. h F: r:.` <`,:.... // TWIN LAKES N0, 6 2 - - ' / I �� VOL, 101, PGS. 32-33 I \ ::.::::: A .. J cE", 8731990330 \ 1121039063 N o -- 193.1r- vi Tom:::::::' - �88'2$`6 E- z / - P�kRC ti f :...... > L=S. - - _ - - - COMPASS CENTER I KING COUNTY I I g TOTAL BOUNDARY �O l R= 6.00 �92 - I SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RS7.2 \ FIRE DISTRICT 39 � 1 _ # 19 392,630 SO FT n7o `'' ;.::: ` he. O ( 33 ) SINGLE-FAMILY 1 0' WETL ND BUFFERI..:.::;.;:ll% g 6 0 .=1� FG=173.00 9.01 AG S �� - % N FG=172.000 L� I RESIDENTIAL (RS9.6) 9,783 S.F. ��c�, i� r� �., I / v 1%v %,;' 10,424 S.F. vl 4�' - - ::s"...::;` : «: R=17#.W o f^r` <: I:sll::,' - EAST LIMIT w I �_ �_ A::c_s'`:?::;::;: �- -1Or23 - z DEVELOPED UNDEVELOPED I OF WETLAND J v 18 �oI ri:»s �' $ 1 I Z N:tx>:; ;;:� _' SINGLE-FAMILY �Q SINGLE-FAMILY �;� mid 7 v RESIDENTIAL FG=180.00 ' �, N f >cl 'I: ��� / I ^ ti RESIDENTIAL I o z I i 9,770 S.F. J N "u FG=178.00 10,893 S.F. i Z IJ f I E. LINE, W. 630, z ` ' _ - ,�� ....... N. 1/2, NE 1/4, SW 1/4 - __ :,..� _ \-�as'25 - = J 34 SITE STATISTICAL BREAK DOWN I I _ TRIACT 'B'-i88.59-- 47':>ttl:.t s:::::>::" L-13 -314 - ' 8731990340 I M R22 00 R=1700 r r :I:Is>1::>:i>>11::'`� TRACT F JEANNE M. SWAN I W TLAND ^ $ 17 ........... $ SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS7.2} I COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: SINGLE-FAMILY HIGH -DENSITY BUFFER 5 g 9 812 s F FG=187.00 I m I;>`.>1 I FG=184.0 OPEN SPACE EXISTING ZONING: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-9.6) - ::<'2:t'3bNt:' �,cli 4o,84s S.F. 62,416 S.F. _ I EXISTING SITE AREA: 392,630f SQ. FT. (9.01± ACRES) 264 S.F. J >:..... ??ss:' / I - - 5_ - s 65' L=5. _ " ( �_ EXISTING BUILDINGS: VACANT ' - i _ _ 5.00 a ;;:;sk'':;: rss.'•;>: R=2 f f r r -- Est 96'-"`'' '? LL S NET PLAT AREA: 222,376 SQ. FT. (5.11 ACRES) TRACT E (- 25 >: ?> > "`< I»: , RV25 - ` 2064 a>':<:a> 15' SA ITARY SEWER 1pDl OPEN c�`o :1 ' \- . ALLOWABLE LOT AREA: 9,600 SO. FT. (MIN.) ,A A 16 N - T PER PLAT D ASEM N SPACE E �o C - - (g�e� 9 603 S.G 193.00 ,e�h ::.:. a FG-190.00 g 3s I ALLOWABLE LOT FRONTAGE: 30 FEET (MIN.) 1 s I 1 40,025 S.F. ,� �� ::::.......;;;;;;;::;>::::;:•;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;<::;;:;:: 9,676 S.F. CR I 30 ABOVE AVERAGE BUILDING NATION 5 8" REBAR WITH CAP & N $ 8731990350 ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT: VE GE B L ELEVATION TACK WITH W SHER ON TOP W / C / TACK SE&A INC LS x;;;;:. I GERALD F. & JUDITH L PARKING REQUIRED. 2 PARKING SPACES (MIN.) -N89�18`03'W - \ • F 6' WOOD ENCE POST �':•;;;;;;;;;;;;;•;:•:;;;;;:;;;:;;;:>:;;;;::;:;;;:;;;::.:;:;;;::;::::_: R 10618 N 6 5 ----_. - R co , ._ CA LSON N I i "- 0.17' - f UND LS 16 3 17&99 L I YARD SETBACK: 20 FEET 1 - RESIDENTIAL R7. FRONT A D SETB K -1-7}:66 SINGLE-FAMILY S 2 t .� ( ) NORTH 1 • „,SIDE YARD SETBACK: 5 FEET cc N N. 1 • �:I>:3:ils`s:'>:y:.:.1>:s::s:::?:i':':Ir::l: `::I»::::::I:.>:>:I?I:` u - - /2, NE =2t.5p' >;/ - REAR YARD SETBACK: 5 FEET SW 1 4 - - 22 91=100.00 15 FG=197.00 10 ^� - - - - - - -110, 21 S.F. /� �:• �� I>:;;;;:;:;:;;<::>,:;:< .::::::::.:::::.::::;:.;;:.;:.;:.::.;> �. ' �?�� FG=196.00 TOTAL LOTS PROPOSED: 21 LOTS / - N88'25'46"W N25 5'57'E - _G� .>s:-:`L^r \ 10,363 S.F. 22.91' N 4.85 j oo \: »:;.;:'::.;:;::.:.';,:'. �. -�'� _ - --- -- -- SMALLEST LOT AREA: 9,603 SQ. FT. W / C, moo \ \� - , 327 SQ. FT. 1/2" REBAR WITH CAP R, 3soo. 36 LARGEST LOT AREA: 15, Y No. 2 / L=14.26' &TACK "BPS&E LSi�_"�' / boo R-��' < b 36 AVERAGE LOT AREA: 10, 059 SQ. FT. 63-6/ 2115510560 / I�R=100.00 g \ I 8731990360 / BUELL, RLYNICHOLAS C. 12870/LSIOXXX" + I / / 2 ''� ' ! JAMES W. & NINA W. I DENSITY: 2.33t LOTS/ACRE / & BEVERLY A. I S87'17'39"E 1.72' /� 14 G=200.00 �/� `� (-\� \ �\ MOORE PROJECTED TRAFFIC FLOW: 210f VEHICLE TRIPS/DAY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS7.2) o / / / G-20Q.00 \ �� SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS712) C4 �- j / 15,327 F. FG=199.50 I �G=199.50 \\ PROPOSED PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY 29,870 SQ. FT. (0.69f ACRES) � N PARCE11 56 w "' 13 I 12- 13,076 S.F. % I EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 6,699 SQ. FT. (0.15t ACRES) o I �, 1, 1 I PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 79,645 SQ. FT. (1.82f ACRES) I �I ^ 10.842 S.F. �I. 10.841 S.F. y I (ONSITE PAVEMENT/CONCRETE) o N / 8731990370 DEVELOPED ISINGLE-FAMILY zl + / c \\\� ROBERT AURTHUR 37 ( RESIDENTIAL / I CORCORAN , / - SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS7.2) TRACT A STORM 82.22� �- ` -�- \ - __J - \ I TRACT 'B' _WETLAND BUFFER _ _ _ - TRACT 'C' LANDSCAPE I REBAR &CAP "LUND N8825'46"W 653.00' '- _ I TRACT 'D' - LANDSCAPE 16213" S87'07'38"E 1.50' SE 1/4, NE 1/4, SW 1/4 - \SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS7.2) FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1121039095 TRA6j ' SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS9.6) C' \ I \ I I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS / 1121039099 1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS7.2)/ I TRACT E - OPEN SPACE TRACT 'F' - OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE CATEGORY PROJECT TOTALS: OPEN SPACE CATEGORY 11,825 SQ. FT. (0.27± ACRES) - NOT CATEGORIZED 20,214 SQ. FT. (0.47f ACRES) - BUFFER 2,939 SQ. FT. (0.07f ACRES) - USEABLE 2,915 SQ. FT. (0.07t ACRES) - USEABLE 40,025 SQ. FT. (0.92f ACRES) - CONSTRAINED 62,416 SQ. FT. (1.43f ACRES) - USEABLE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. L! �:� 11 i s�l �.-- r p DU AS BAY SW 304TH 5���� SW STD` 1`v S I E 30TTH a30o,= y 5� 30B QQ ' \I310Tt1 ST PARK >3-0 ^'4 4J pp �1 Sv SW 31114a "¢iPAMC 3�i1 Q��i �y SN31 KlSiDES i } sa Surd PLC S PL y'"'i `r%Y S� 313 SW 31qi Ty ')p9 9G $4 aTMS 0o h� rya v SW yww`` 43(31 $`N 3TP01N `1U :���� :�1�3� Nx�314TH- ,`N l: t'° 2 yam.' SW 3I7TH PL LN $,�. PO IM x. pt� ml•• KIx 8, 'yp~ a J� Y S `ils.T C SC %�, � T. q� Z• M C� `` ,g 0 5N 3. hl ST b _5 N N p S4 •� 31 f �_,(!- t_ o P: > ,: x>-.. 3 SW 378 „S7 .�' � � •� d � � SW �A �L_t< "' s� S. S � . a E,,,_ T 1• 9 N 5 Cry � .., �r er DASH "' SW �319�1i � 197H Lize al OTN ST ^'1�s ar.� 1 3 s 'fJ""' SWe $700 veal",L7N 0I14200 �2 C y 31wx PL s ��pL319TH .3 .GASH ��A' PorHr vozrrr 2 6 sP � Q M 3�,3f q Tarx y q _. 110' .� . CAf4PGR0U SiAT:. y ' s' 2 LA e0 322N Sr 13.T COLF 0° 3R0 PARK. ; a 4100 S 323'R S St o rrRr s 9 0 CLllB n�1. �' t�aw-raa �.... xt�uv ..36anax-. C S r P/ DL P SN 3 �i 0 m 2 L ' 1 0 1v � a'' �`3 V� v� pp PS' 5tl 6 S tlOREIr_ /''�J/'� S 'F � / •Ct' N3 a -- (J3\7d .ct S SN 3 z s f 6 ,P '� 3 T N STN N' s 15 26 J RI 3 TN P 5� <N ,�p14 6Sa w32 Pl a� r y t F r\ ry y / '!?yam, L M g rj�i s� I 4 su � v3 �326 N s's \ SW a��'�' SW 322M S7 = f� N st'1x p�sy�`' ��., 327� ST EXISTING EP El -----SS-- 0 -----W- - a 0 0 PERCENT OF SITE N.A. 5.16% 0.08% 0.07% 10.19% 15.90% CATEGORY REQUIRED 15% MIN. PROPOSED USEABLE 10% MIN. 16.05% CONSERVATION N.A. ( 0.00% BUFFER ( 2% MAX. 5.16% CONSTRAINED 2% MAX. 1 10.19% OPEN SPACE TOTAL 31.40% VICINITY MAP N.T.S. LEGEND PROPOSED PROPERTY/LOT LINE EASEMENT LINE ROAD CENTERLINE EDGE OF PAVING/CURB LINE CONTOUR LINE STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STORM DRAIN LINE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER LINE CLEAN OUT WATER VALVE WATER FIRE HYDRANT WATER MAIN LINE ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE ROOF DRAIN LINE ROCKERY GAS METER WATER METER POWER TRANSFORMER ELECTRIC BOX, FLUSH TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX STREET LIGHT GAS VALVE UTILITY POLE GUY ANCHOR TELEPHONE RISER SIGN (AS NOTED) SECURITY LIGHT TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE MONUMENT IN CASE POWER VA ULT AULT CHAIN LINK FENCE SECTION LINE WOOD FENCE RETAINING WALL EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ±59,000 CY CUT, ±23,000 CY FILL NET = ±36,000 CY CUT QUANTITIES ARE FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALCULATE QUANTITIES FOR BID PURPOSES. r o 0 o O CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PRECONSTRUCTION/INSPECTION TEL. No. (253) 835-2700 . PERMIT NO. ,. CITY OF FEDE aia Z 0 � ~ D } Z 0 F- U z W 0 Q -1 0 W zO U 0 z U) m' LL 0 Q W 7- c� w a 0 U) r) W 0 W Q W U) aaaaO W cr W X W a Z WcoCC) 01 U y (� v U ® � E; 5 LIT Z N CO CO �Q 3 04j 04 �v oa. uj W 3: O ox Apr ii. CC J W ® 00 Z �- 0Lu Q V =0 Z Z J Z J J W LLI ~ H N co la y Z UJ rn Q 1_ ® Q WOW C* n J 0. Z Q } ® O a m 0 Z ID W M W � L J LIj W z 0. W w CC t- S rn U .. N co � n U Designed: JPW Drawn: JPW Checked: CAD Scale: V 50' Date: 04/01/08 Ja17"Loti: 05170.0 RAL WAY Sheet No.: NOV '041. PI APPROVED BY: CITY 0E FEDE AL PDATE: CDS 1 of 0 Sheets