Loading...
16-100199Leila Willoughby -Oakes From: Carlo Evangelisti <CEvangelisti@landauinc.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 3:07 PM To: Julie Brannberg Cc: Leila Willoughby -Oakes; Calvin McCaughan; Steve Wright; Katie Saltanovitz; Erik Ainsworth; steve.woods@contourpllc.com Subject: RE: Drain pipe repair Good Afternoon Julie - That is unfortunate to hear as we have been upfront and have provided our scope items in a timely manner, in our opinion, and have gone above and beyond our contracted scope of work in providing guidance to what is needed in addition to the geotechnical and stormwater memorandum to obtain the critical areas permit. The last item required from Landau Associates for the permit submittal is a review letter stating that the permit submittal package incorporates our geotechnical recommendations. Unfortunately to complete that last task we need the submittal package from the rest of the design team — not just the plans from Erik Ainsworth but the plans from the home designer as well and a stamped copy of the survey. After submitting the Geotechnical report, I emailed you a list of "next steps" that you requested on March 291h 2016. In that email I requested this same information. It would be prudent to remind Pamela Sommerville that we are very close (based on recent emails from Erik and others), and if she chooses to go with a new team it will further delay the process — probably by several more months as she would essentially be starting over with a new permit application. Additionally the new geotechnical report would have to go through a third party review which will add even more time and additional costs. I talked with the City yesterday and was informed that Landau Associates is the reason the permit application is still open due to us copying the city on all correspondence and that there has been very little communication regarding the permit with Prime NW or Mrs. Sommerville. Please let me know the status of the work as you receive it. Thank you for your prompt attention to this project. Carlo Carlo Evangelisti Landau Associates Ext. 173 Direct: (425) 329-0273 From: Julie Brannberg [ma ilto:julie@primenwc.com] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 3:51 PM To: Carlo Evangelisti <CEvangelisti@landauinc.com> Subject: Re: Drain pipe repair Our client, Pamela Sommerville, has stated that she wants another company to come in and take over the permitting process. We have emailed her to advise her against this but have not heard back. Our hands are pretty much tied until she makes a decision and tells us that we can move forward. I believe you need the site plan as well as specifications on the drain repair. Erik Ainsworth is in charge of both of these things. I will ask him to email you with an update. Julie Julie Brannberg Prime NW Construction julie@primenwc.com 360 790-6317 0 On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Carlo Evangelisti 5CEv0gelisti@a landauinc.com> wrote: Good Afternoon Julie —what is the status of the final permit documents / plans? From our last conversation a few weeks it was my understanding that we would be receiving the plans to perform our final review prior to submission to the City for the permit. The last items need from Landau is a letter stating that we reviewed the plans and specs and they conform to the recommendations in our geotechnical report. CE Carlo Evangelisti Landau Associates Ext. 173 Direct: (425) 329-0273 From: Julie Brannberg [mailto:julie@pr_imenwc.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 10:17 AM To: Carlo Evangelisti <CEvangelisti@landauinc.com>; Katie Saltanovitz <KSaltanovitr@landauinc.com> Subject: Fwd: Drain pipe repair Hi Carlo & Katie, Can either of you help me understand what Leila's email is saying? We wanted to make arrangements to repair the pipe that has a middle section missing but now I feel confused. Thank you, Julie Julie Brannberg Prime NW Construction julie@primenwc.com (360) 790-6317 0 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Leila Willoughby -Oakes <Leila.Willou b-Oalces cit offederalwa .com> Date: Fri, May 13, 2016 at 4:34 PM Subject: RE: Drain pipe repair To: Julie Brannberg <'ulie rimenwc.com> Cc: Carlo Evangelisti <CEvan elisti landauinc.com> Julie, Please note rip rap is difficult to permit as it is hard armoring, it is on the applicant to address and meet the following criteria, this includes geotechnical reporting on this aspect of the project: 15.05.050 Shoreline modifications. U SHRRE (1) Shoreline stabilization. Shoreline stabilization may be permitted in the shoreline residential environment. Hard armoring (e.g., bulkheads and riprap) is subject to a shoreline conditional use permit in the urban conservancy environment. Soft -shore stabilization may be permitted in the urban conservancy environment. Shoreline stabilization proposals shall address the following: (a) Shoreline stabilization, including bulkheads. shall not be considered an outright permitted use on the cit 's shorelines. In order for shoreline stabilization to be permitted the city must find that: (i) The applicant shall provide a geotechnical report, prepared by a qualified professional, that estimates the rate of erosion and evaluates alternative solutions; and the urgency associated with the specific situation; and (ii) Soft -shore stabilization alternatives such as slope drainage systems, vegetative growth stabilization, gravel berms, and beach nourishment shall be prioritized over structural options such as bulkheads and riprap. The "softest" effective alternative shall be utilized; and (iii) In the case of proposed hard armoring stabilization solutions (e.g., bulkheads and riprap), erosion from waves or currents presents a clear and imminent (damage within three years) threat to a legally established primary structure, one or more substantial accessory structures, water -dependent development, ecological restoration/toxic clean-up remediation projects, or public improvements; and (iv) In the case of bulkheads and riprap, the proposed shoreline stabilization is located landward of the ordinary high water mark; and (v) The proposed shoreline stabilization is the minimum size necessary to protect existing improvements; and (vi) The applicant shall demonstrate that impacts to sediment transport are minimized to the greatest extent possible; and (vii) Shoreline stabilization shall not have an adverse impact on the property of others and shall be designed so as not to create the need for shoreline stabilization elsewhere; and (viii) Shoreline stabilization shall not significantly interfere with normal surface and/or subsurface drainage into the water body and shall be constructed using an approved filter cloth or other suitable means to allow passage of surface and groundwater without internal erosion of fine material; and (ix) Shoreline stabilization shall not be used to create new lands; and (x) Use of chemically treated wood is prohibited for any shoreline stabilization proposal within fresh water lake shorelines; and (xi) Use of creosote treated wood is prohibited within marine shorelines; and (xii) Revegetation with native plants is required as part of the shoreline stabilization project; and (xiii) Shoreline stabilization shall not otherwise result in a net loss of ecological functions. (b) When a bulkhead or other structural alternative is permitted subject to subsection (1)(a) of this section, the following standards shall apply: (i) The maximum height of the proposed bulkhead or other stabilization structure is no more than one foot above the elevation of mean higher high water on tidal waters, or one foot in height above the elevation of ordinary high water mark on lakes, measured from grade on the waterward side of the bulkhead or structure; and (ii) When a bulkhead or other stabilization structure has deteriorated such that the ordinary high water mark has been established by the presence and action of water landward of the existing bulkhead, then the replacement bulkhead or structure must be located at or landward of the ordinary high water mark. (iii) Repair of an existing bulkhead or other stabilization structure is permitted provided that the repaired bulkhead or structure is not relocated further waterward or increased in height. (iv) If an existing bulkhead or other stabilization structure is destroyed it may be replaced as it existed prior to destruction, provided application for required permits is made within one year of destruction. Additions to or increases in size of existing shoreline stabilization measures shall be considered new structures. (v) Soft -shoreline stabilization measures that provide restoration of shoreline ecological functions may be permitted waterward of the ordinary high water mark. (vi) The project satisfies the provisions of FWRC 15.05:040(5)(b). From: Leila Willoughby -Oakes Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 4:21 PM To: 'Julie Brannberg' Cc: 'Carlo Evangelisti' Subject: RE: Drain pipe repair Julie, You will need a detailed site plan on the placement, size and more information on this rip -rap or dispersion method (elevation and site plant) into the sound (total coverage, height and materials, and ordinary high water mark). If you have not retained professional land/shoreline consulting help you may need to do so in order for the applicant to comply with Title 15- Shoreline Management, as the City is the review agency we unfort. cannot provide design advice. I have reattached the technical review letter providing comments and references to the code sent to you in November 2015 that will hopefully clarify the codes you need to read. Please contact Laura Arber regarding your proposal and if you need a HPA (Hydraulic Permit Approval) at: La..wcwArbe e Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife I Marine Habitat Biologist 116oi8 Mill Creek Blvd, Mill Creek, WA 98012 1 P. (425)�79-2�06 Laura.ArberQdfw.wa.I Hours M-F. 8:30 - 3:00 Please see her initial comments below from October 2015 based on the plans submitted: Hello Leila, If they plan to place any structure along or waterward of the bulkhead they will need an HPA. Additionally, Im not sure the gabion baskets will be permitable without further review. If they place a structure (such as gabion baskets) on the shoreline they typically need to mitigate by removing a similar footprint of something like debris (old tires, broken concrete sections, bricks, non-native angular rocks, etc.). Thanks for checking and let me know if you have additional questions. Regards, La.t-wa,Arber Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife I Marine Habitat Biologist 116o18 Mill Creek Blvd, Mill Creek, WA 98o12 I P. (42S)�79-2�06 Laura.Arber@dfw.wa.gov I Hours M-F. 8:30 - 3:00 This is a shoreline modification which is permitted in the Shoreline Residential Environment, however not past the ordinary high water mark. If past the OHWM SEPA (Environmental Review, Public Noticing and threshold determination) is required. Lands covered by water is not a SEPA exemption. Please also find the following project protest letter from an abutting neighbour. Please resubmit the shoreline exemption permit request with the Thank you, L. Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner N'a 20 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:2531835-2 Fax: 2.53/835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com Land Use Forms: http:www.cityoffederalway.com/index.aspx?ni6=481 For general planning inquiries please call. 253-835-2655. The on -call planner will assist you. From: Julie Brannberg [mailto:iul're@primenwc.co Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 1:13 PM To: Leila Willoughby -Oakes Subject: Fwd: Drain pipe repair Hi Leila, Can you review this email string and help me? Thanks, Julie Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Katie Saltanovitz <KSaltanovitz@landauinc.com> Date: May 13, 2016 at 13:05:18 PDT To: Julie Brannberg <iulie@pritnenwc.com>, Erik Ainsworth <erik cr,thelanddeveloper.com> Cc: Carlo Evangelisti <CEvangelisti@landauinc.com> Subject: RE: Drain pipe repair Julie, you should probably continue coordinating with Leila Willoughby -Oakes, and if she needs more specific guidance I'm sure she will point you toward the relevant City department. She had previously mentioned that Kevin Peterson (Kevin.Peterson@cityoffederalway.com) would be the City's engineering plan reviewer. He may be the one making the final determination on what the City will accept for that outfall. Regards, Katie Saltanovitz, PE Landau Associates, Inc. From: Julie Brannberg [mailto:iulie@primenwc.comj Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 12:51 PM To: Erik Ainsworth <erik thelanddeveloper.com> Cc: Katie Saltanovitz <KSaltanovitz@landauinc.com>; Carlo Evangelisti <CEvangelisti@landauinc.com> Subject: Re: Drain pipe repair Thanks, Katie. Who should I direct these questions to at the City? Julie Brannberg Prime NW Construction Julie primenwc.com (360) 790-6317 0 On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Erik Ainsworth <erik thelandderfelo er.eom> wrote: Part of this repair is making sure the outfall has appropriate rip -rap protection. Erik B. Ainsworth, PE The Land Developer's Engineered Solution a division of The Land Developer, LLC 110 Ruby Street SE Tumwater, WA 98501 email: erik�thelanddeveloper.co_m Cell: (360) 250-3973 Office: (360) 890-4806 From: Katie Saltanovitz[mailto:KSaltanovitz@landauinc.com] Sent: Friday, May 13, 201612:41 PM To: Julie Brannberg <mulie LD rjmenwc.com>; Erik Ainsworth <erik@thelanddeveloper.com>; Carlo Evangelisti <CEvangelisti@land@uinc.com> Subject: RE: Drain pipe repair Julie, If you intend to repair the existing pipe, you may want to confirm with the City they will consider that an acceptable approach for managing site drainage before you invest the money in the repair. Landau Associates' assessment of the pipe didn't include enough detail for me to know what the scope of the repair would need to be. Our investigation was limited to the top portion of the pipe (about 32 linear ft). We did not observe the downslope portion of pipe or the toe of slope outfall (if it exists). It seems reasonable that if repair is possible, this pipe could manage the necessary flow (as we concluded in the drainage memo). However, it is possible that the existing outfall may not meet all of the County's erosion protection requirements (velocity dissipation, above -grade tight lining, etc). The City would have to determine if the outfall could be grandfathered in, or if they would require you to reconstruct it in accordance with current requirements. Please feel free to call me or Carlo with any questions. Thanks, Katie Saltanovitz, PE Landau Associates, Inc. From: Julie Brannberg [mailtojulie rimenwc.com] Sent: Friday, May 13, 201612:05 PM To: Katie Saltanovitz <KSaltanovitz landauinc.com>; Erik Ainsworth <erik@thelanddeveloper.com>; Carlo Evangelisti <CEvangelisti@landauinc.com> Subject: Drain pipe repair Hi Katie & Erik, 10 J+� Prime NW is going to hire a contractor to repair the pipe at 29604 29th - the Sommerville project site. Katie, in order for Landau to approve of the repair, what specifications should we give the contractor? Thank you, Julie Julie Brannberg Prime NW Construction iulie primenwc,com (360)790-6317 0 11 6 1 1 �0 1(-e mam ba; "xA RECOMMENDED CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE A detailed construction sequence is needed to ensure that erosion and sediment control measures are applied at the appropriate times. A recommended construction sequence is provided below: 1. Hold the pre -construction meeting, if required 2. Post sign with name and phone number of TESC supervisor (may be consolidated with the required notice of construction sign). 3. Flag or fence clearing limits. 4. Install catch basin protection, if required. 5. Grade and install construction entrances) 6. Install perimeter protection (silt fence, brush barrier, etc.). 7. Construct sediment pond and traps, if required. 8. Grade and stabilize construction roads. 9. Construct surface water controls (interceptor dikes, pipe slope drains, etc.) simultaneously with clearing and grading for project development. 10. Maintain erosion control measures in accordance with King County standards and manufacture's recommendations. 11. Relocate erosion control measure, or install new measures so that as site conditions change, the erosion and sediment control is always in accordance with the King County Erosion and Sedimentation Control Standards. 12. Cover all areas that will be unworked for more than seven days during the dry season or two days during the wet season with straw, wood fiber mulch, compost, plastic sheeting, or equivalent. 13. Stabilize all areas within seven days of reaching final grade. 14. Seed, sod, stabilize, or cover any areas to remain\unworked for more than 30 days. 15. Upon completion of the project, stabilize all disturbed areas and remove BMP's if appropriate. 15 Know what's below. Call before you dlg. LEGEND QO SILT FENCE z C-4 TOPSOIL STOCKPILE C4 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION LLIM ey I I ; •I'3I1 SEDIMENT IS TRACKED OFFSITE, PUBLIC ROADS SHALL BE CLEANED +OROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY. OR MORE FREQUENTLY DURING ET WEATHER IF NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING ATER$ OF THE STATE, mwENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ROADS BY SHOVELING OR PICKUP BEEPING AND SHALL BE TRANSPORTED TO A CONTROLLED SEDIMENT `� , -! 10 ` •`,1�`� ~- - SpOSALARE& STREET WASHING WILL BEALLOWED ONLYAFTER SEDIMENT REMOVED IN iIs MANNER. STREET WASH WASTEWATER SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY I - _ \. ]Woo BACK DNSITE, OR OTHERWISE BE PREVENTED FROM DISCHARGING ll] _ _ To DRAINAGE SYSTEMS TRIBUTARY TO SURFACE WATERS. • K ` r _ / TO OF SLOP J20 OVER MEASURES SHALL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING Y - ~~ EQUIREMENTA: COVER MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED IF AN AREA IS TO REMAIN MYOr;K� FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS DURING THE DRY SEASON (MAY 1- OSEPTEMBER30) OR FOR MORE THAN TWO CONSECUTIVE WORKING DAYS - �'- -- RING THE WET SEASON (OCTOBER 1 TO APRIL 30} THESE TIME LIMITS MAY 15- U-- — -I ,- - E RELAXED IF AN AREA POSES A LOW RISK OF EROSION DUE TO SOIL TYPE, LOPE GRADIENT, ANTICIPATED WEATHER CONDITONS, OR OTHER FACTORS. 20 Oo;E, SELY, THE COUNTY MAY REDUCE THESE TIME LIMITS IF SITE _ , _ _ - �1' . QWT[ONS WARRANT GREATER PROTECTION (E.G., ADJACENT TO `}1 _ �- -- _ IGHIFICANT AQUATIC RESOURCES OR HIGHLY EROSIVE SOILS) OR IF- IQNSCANT PRECIPRA" IS EXPECTED. ANY AREA TO REMAIN UNWORKED FOR MORE THAN 30 DAYS SHALL BE EEDED OR SODDED UNLESS THE COUNTY DETERMINES THAT WINTER•- (EATNER MARES VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT INFEASIBLE. DURING THE VET SEASON, EXPOSED GROUND SLOPES AND STOCKPILE SLOPES WITH AN m __ _ II 1 ~ t ICUNE OF 3 HORIZONTAL TO I VERTICAL (3HAV) OR STEEPER AND WITH �' - J - �- - --- --- - - �r���� � LORE THAN TEN FEET OF VERTICAL RELIEF SHALL BE COVERED IF THEY ARE �I O REMAIN UNWORKEO FOR MORE THAN 12 HOURS. ALSO DURING TFiz WET $0' _ r rr -- 5, I �kk � 1 'SEASON, THE MATERIAL NECESSARY TO COVERALL OISTURBEDARFA.9MUST �� -�� �.]] SO'SHORELINE iE STOCKPILED ON SITE.THE INTENT OF THESE COVER REOVIREISEM5IS BUILDING SETBACK � 1)HAVE AS MUCH AREAAS POSSIBLE OOVERED DURING ANY PERIO0 OF TLECIPITATIOH. \ SPOUTS FOOTINGDRAINS SOIL STOCKPILE C-4 6AA Vv C ! " Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan King County 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual DRIVEWAY AREA TO BE REMOVED 833 SF EXISTING DRIVEWAY AREA TO REMAIN 1635 SF SCS #1 RIM EL = M I M1111"Uml 80 -' ' Permit Number: TBD f �,f� j♦� •h r i t J 7/ 106 SOS 110� 115 120� Applicant Name: Kristi Szilak GRAPHIC SCALE e tQ k IN = 20 EET 1 Lneb IL 656L ` ��AP-iJ CL V'6MW dG' WQ iuV, A ila --rfp / Lloq Pt-.\kr8n [-0,ijj6� aAci LIESriAQ GABION BASKET ENERGY DISSIPATER `n ` j ,(/�1/1 Al Nth APPROX. LOCATION rY Lti� G Vr (V l� V�1L►N OF EXISTING BULKHEAD -��(— DV I I��'/'jI (_ ) UPPER LIMITS 00 THE � eCa r2 R l._LAI l((�,L- l J FEMA 100- B 500-YEAR FLOODPLAIN HOPE SDR 32.5 STORM - �r�L�Y L✓'�C-V 1� LiI�Y CONVEYANCE TO BE � G 1 ABOVE GROUND IN SLOPE AREAS THAT EXCEED 40% IR 1 I EKLSTXNG DECK, C-PTO L,,Cd � IpI]1�NLlrtIlGj.l /'� 739 Sr AlN i� .p I �i' 1 I V V LY. I n 0)04 aC C1•� re'i /\;o eqP- M 3' X CAST IN PLACE � � �` �� 1 CONCE'FE RpNCHOR IMF RIM E i . �� UJ ft (dri 9 �i.L111 r l BELT FENCING G4 C` PLap-r"I FOOTPRINT OF , P i _1,11 �J Per r?C EXISTING FOUNDATION �rt 4444L41 1 17�BSF 1 i } -k q - �wu,n 13. f.0d <p Ce .0- pZk fin: �.1 r\e Jr,0,a frJ �t A I _95 r _-1os CONSTRUCTION LIMITS C_4 7. 44P��'r S �Gl Pf r 110 200, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT AREA r 5 PROPOSED RETAINLNG WALL��L rC Wei 1 j�/ SEPARATE APPROVAL REWIRE /'_T P S -t"O Wei I/ )20 I Lv._/j /} f CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Y y ll�e f� WALL DRAINAGE TO BE CONNECTED TO PROPOSED STORM SYSTEM AND VVV d! ULLJ 1J'/j_FF/I �lll`/1� DISCHARGED TO THE PUGET SOUIJP _ �i�% LL.Cilr1� Parcel Number: 0121039108 J A N 14 2016 Site Address: 29604 — 23RD AVE SMOFFEDERALWAY Sheet 4 of Sheet 5 Agenda Date: 1/21/2016 Subject: 16-100199 & 15-105180 Sommerville SFR From: Vince Faranda, Deputy Fire Marshal South King Fire and Rescue 253-946-7242 vince.faranda[cDsouthkin_ fig re.org A Certificate of Water Availability shall be provided at the time of application indicating the fire flow available at the site. A hydraulic fire flow model shall be requested from the water district. Fire apparatus access roadways shall be required for every building when any portion of an exterior wall of the first story is located more than 150 ft. from fire apparatus vehicle access. Fire apparatus access roads: 1) Shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. 2) Shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of a 75,000 pound fire apparatus and shall be provided with a surface so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. 3) Shall be not less than a 32 foot inside turning radius and not less than a 40 foot outside turning radius. 4) With a dead-end in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with a cul-de-sac at the dead end. All such cul-de-sacs shall be not less than 80 feet in diameter. EXCEPTION: A modified turnaround can be approved when the building is protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 5) Gradient shall not exceed 15 percent. EXCEPTION: When buildings are protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system the travel distance can be increased 20 percent. Access road gates shall comply with South King Fire and Rescue Administrative Policy Guideline No. 10.001. An NFPA 13D automatic fire sprinkler system is required for this residence. Automatic fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in Group R, Division 3 occupancies: 1) Without adequate fire flow. 2) Without approved fire department access- 1 2s--3-433.5-173Z A l L3 <<s DA .t u.3 9!2% *yQ2 rl ?Q4* (d5 t -7- k .� 4la"MaN f Ie c die ` -66 / 3 28F RECOMMENDED CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE A detailed construction sequence is needed to ensure that erosion and sediment control measures are applied at the appropriate times. A recommended construction sequence is provided below: 1. Hold the pre —construction meeting, if required 2. Post sign with name and phone number of TESC supervisor (may be consolidated with the required notice of construction sign). 3. Flag or fence clearing limits. 4. Install catch basin protection, if required. 5. Grade and install construction entrance(s) 6. Install perimeter protection (silt fence, brush barrier, etc.). 7. Construct sediment pond and traps, if required, 8. Gracie and stabilize construction roads. 9. Construct surface water controls (interceptor dikes, pipe slope drains, etc.) simultaneously with clearing and grading for project development. 10. Maintain erosion control measures in accordance with King County standards and manufacture's recommendations. 11. Relocate erosion control measure, or install new measures so that as site conditions change, the erosion and sediment control is always in accordance with the King County Erosion and Sedimentation Control Standards. 12. Cover all areas that will be unworked for more than seven days during the dry season or two days during the wet season with straw, woad fiber mulch, compost, plastic sheeting, or equivalent. 13. Stabilize all areas within seven days of reaching final grade. 14. Seed, sod, stabilize, or cover any areas to remain\unworked for more than 30 days. 15. Upon completion of the project, stabilize all disturbed areas and remove BMP's if appropriate. 1 Know whars below. Call before you dig. LEGEND I}4 SILT FENCE C4 TOPSOIL STOCKPILE Z7 3 C4 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE vp CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 0 SEDIMENT IS TRACKED OFFSTTE, PUBLIC ROADS SHALL BE CLEANED IOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY, OR MORE FREQUENTLY DURING ET WEATHER IF NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING ATERSOF THE STATE 'MIkENT SHXL BE REMOVED FROM ROADS HEEPIHG ANDAND 91ALL BEBE TR/V7SPORTBD TOA YCONI'ROLLEP SEDMMNT SPOSAL AREA STREET WASHING WLLL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER %GIMENT REMOVED IN 4S MANNER. STREET WASH WASTEWATER SHALL BE CONTTR p1LE HO By ]HG JMPING BACK ONSTIE. OR OTHERWISE Be PREVENTED TO DFWNAOE 6YSTEMS TF4anARYTO SURFACE WATERS. OVER MEASURES &WL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING EOUIREMENTS: COVER MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED IF AN AREA IS TO REMAIN NWORKED FOR MORE- THAN SEVER DAYS DURING THE DAY SEASON 'MAY 1 0SEPI MEER 30) OR FOR MGM THAN-0 CONSECUTNE WORIURODAYS UWKG THE WETS°-ASOR iCOTOBER 170 APRIL 30) SSE TINE LJMiTS MAY E RELAXED IF AN AREA POSES LOW RISK OF EROSION DUE TO SWL TYPE. LOPE GRADIENT, ANTICIPATED WEATHER CON OITIONS, OR OTHER FACTORS. OWERSELY, TK COUNTY MAY REDUCE THESE -15 LIMITS IF SITE ONDITIONS WARRANT GREATER PROTECTION IE.G., ADIAO1 TOO IONIFTOAHT AOU/1TIC RESOURCES OR HIGHLY EROSIVE SOTS)ORIF IGNTIC,ANT PRECIPITATION iS O(P'ECTED. _ANY AREA TO REALUN UNWORKEO FOR MORE TFNN 90 DAYS SHALL BE EEOED OR SODDED UNLESS THE CDWrY DETERMINES THAT WINTER YFATHER 610NI :S VEGETATIO?I ESTA13USHMENT INFEASISLE DURING THE VE T SEASON. EVOSPA GROUND SLOPES AND STOCKPILE SLOPES WITH AN 4CUNE OF 3 HORIZONTAL TO I VERTICAL(3KIV) OR STEEPER; AND WITH TORETH NTEN FEET OF VERTICAL RELIEF SHALL BE COVERED IF THEY ARE 'O REMAN UNWORKED FOR MORE THAN 12 HOURS. A= DLIRWG THE WET IWSTE�YORLEURAREAS IS �I STOC1I EAON I.TIE TF THHUECOVER REQINTS '0 HAVE AS MUCH AREA AS POSSIBLE COVERED DURING ANY PER= OF I I r 1 i !rrl�lil r �r-�-- r ,IffIII:IIEIr f I ;III!l111llil -75 10 THE or PE - 20 20 30.'— ,4 M _ \ 50' SHORELINE BUILDING SETBACK I Try _. OF$L�_0 E__.r I I \ 1 so - DOWNSPOUTS AND FOOTING DRAINS 65 DRIVEWAY AREA TO BE REMOVED 833 SF � SOIL STOCKPILE EXISTING DRIVEWAY C-4 AREA TO REMAIN 1635 SF LIM Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Kin Count 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual 9 Y MU I � _ _ _;�7iIST1HGSN - - E TO BE REMO' 500 SF SCS #1 RIM EL = 84.5' i 415�T r BS Permit Number: TBD I RESIOENCE 4406 SF FFEL•j5S _ ' . I _ i75 rim 85 -90 ATTACHED GARAGE r F L=85' r� _ 105 r rr 110 r f r 5 r�/r Fr rr r r� J20 rrr r'r ' o GRAPHIC SCALE a >a (INF7) I Iac3 - 20 It. BSBL GABION BASKET ENERGY DISSIPATER APPROX. LOCATION OF EXISTING BULKHEAD UPPER LIMITS OF THE FEMA 300- A 500-YEAR FLOODPLAIN HOPE SDR 32.5 STORM CONVEYANCE TO BE ABOVE GROUND IN SLOPE AREAS THAT EXCEED 40% EXISTING DECK, TO REMAIN 739 SF 3' x 3' CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE ANCHOR L7B111 L RI M EL n 67' SILT FENCING 4 FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING FOUNDATION _1726 SP 200' SHORELIN MANAG9140) T.AIIEAC PROpOsED: AINING WA' SEPARATE APPROVAL REQT F " CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WALL DRAINAGE TO BE CONNECTED TO PROPOSED STORM SYSTEM AND r DISCHARGED TO THE PUGET SOU 106• 105� 110� 115r 120 �.._ . Parcel Number: 0121039108 Applicant Name: Kristi Szilak Site Address: 29604 — 23RD AVE S OF CEDSERAL INN Sheet of Sheet 4 5 January 20, 2016 ��aAaalwbrY1 Jim Ferrell, Mayor FILE Julie Brannberg Emailed: Julie .0 rimenwc.com Prime NW Construction 1113 Sleater Kinney Road SE Lacey, WA 98503 RE: FILE #16-100199-00-PC; PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED Sommerville Shoreline Residence, 29604 23rd Avenue SW, Federal Way Dear Ms. Brannberg: The Community Development Department is in receipt of your preapplication conference request. The application has been routed to members of the Development Review Committee and a meeting with the project applicant has been scheduled as follows: 9:00 a.m. — Thursday, January 28, 2016 Hylebos Conference Room Federal Way City Hall, 2nd Floor 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 We look forward to meeting with you. Please coordinate directly with anyone else you would like to attend the meeting as this will be the only notice sent by the department. If you have any questions regarding the meeting, please contact me at lei la.willt)tiehbv-oakes,c eitvo[ ederal",ay.com, or 253- 835-2644. Sincerely, Leila Willoughby- Associateaes Planner c: Carlo Evangelisti. P.E.. Senior Geotechnical Engineer. Email: ceyang-elisti Ca landauinc.com File No 16-100199-00-PC Doc I D 72009 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 - (253) 835-7000 - www.cityoffederalway.com CITY OF Federal Way APPLICATION NO(s) RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY a ECONDM*STER LAND USE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT DEPARTM 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JAN 4 Zo�� Federal 81" Avenue South Way, WA 98003-6325 W 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 ��w.�•.ritvuf3i;dcr,tlway.u�m Date Project Name isb-MMer00� 6 16pf, w 2W AIRM-O't vi Property Address/Location '2-4to W yqTJ I(,0- �C0(qq-00 pC, Parcel Numbers) O QJ0 2)- s Tl 0 Project Description ,� r�� �r`� ��1 1►�'� PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only .Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential uired Information Zoning Designation Comprehensive Plan Designation _Value of Existing Improvements ,Value of Proposed Improvements Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type Construction Type k I ou 9)h W V-(LL 0 6 S� (12*0) 77 ejfttjL nub L . LAPOr, ay (if different than Applicant) ame: yr uVa fPltaame: ddress: 40 14 ;Z2' ty/State: " WA Bulletin #003 — January 1, 2011 Page I of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ,COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 15, 2016 TO. E.J. Walsh, Development Services Manager Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Vince Faranda, South King Fire & Rescue Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer FROM: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Planning FOR DRC MTG. ON. January 21, 2016,10:00 AM - Internal January 28, 2016, 9:00 AM- with applicant (Please note dates expedited, formal review in process. With thanks.) FILE NUMBER(s): 16-100199-00-PC RELATED FILE NOS.: 15-105180-SF, 15-105178-SH, 15-105319-AD (Direct Services) PROJECT NAME SOMMERVILLE SFR PROJECTADDRESS.• 29604 23RD AVE SW ZONING DISTRICT RS 15.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal replaces a 1,600 sf. house/holiday home destroyed by fire on the Puget Sound with a new home containing 6,800 sf of living area, a 672 sf garage and a 1,200 sf. deck. The plan set indicates improvements on the shoreline will include a gabion basket and potentially a new bulkhead or modifications. The applicant requests a retroactive pre -application to clarify the City's code requirements and evaluate the project scope. Staff completed their first review. A technical review letter was sent on November 17, 2015. The site is located within a geologically hazardous area in the Residential Shoreline Designation. Applicant has applied for direct services to conduct a geotechnical study. Site zoned and designated RS 15.0. LAND USE PERMITS. - PROJECT CONTACT: MATERIALS SUBMITTED. Shoreline Exemption Julie Brannberg Prime NW Construction 1113 Sleater Kinny Road SE Lacey, WA 98503 iulie.brannberg rz srmail.com See SF/SH/AD applications materials Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Services - Kevin/Peter November 17, 2016- Technical Review Letter