12-101079CITY OF
�., Federal Way
April 10, 2012
Mr. Eric LaBrie
ESM Consulting Engineers
181 333`d Street, Suite 210
Federal Way, WA 98003
FILL
CITY HALL
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
(253) 835-7000
www.cityoffederalway.com
Re: File #12-101079-00-PC, PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
Pierson Driveway, Parcel 614360-0657, Federal Way
Dear Mr. LaBrie:
Thank you for participating in the preapplication conference with the City of Federal Way's Development
Review Committee (DRC) held March 29, 2012. We hope that the information discussed at that meeting
was helpful in understanding the general requirements for your project as submitted.
This letter summarizes comments given to you at the meeting by the members of the DRC. The members
who reviewed your project and provided comments include staff from the City's Planning and Building
Divisions and Public Works Department, and representatives from Lakehaven Utility District and South
King Fire and Rescue. Some sections of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) and relevant information
handouts are enclosed with this letter. Please be advised, this letter does not represent all applicable
codes. In preparing your formal application, please refer to the complete FWRC and other relevant codes
for all additional requirements that may apply to your project.
The key contact for your project is Matthew Herrera, 253-835-2638, matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com.
For specific technical questions about your project, please contact the appropriate DRC representative as
listed below. Otherwise, any general questions about the preapplication and permitting process can be
referred to your key contact.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Applicant proposes to clear and grade on three undeveloped single-family lots to construct a driveway
prior to obtaining building permits. Intrusion into stream buffer may be necessary for temporary
construction and the permanent location of proposed driveway.
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Outlined below are the comments made by the representatives of each department present at the
preapplication conference. Each section should be read thoroughly. If you have questions, please contact
the representative listed for that section.
Mr. LaBrie
Page 2
April 10, 2012
PLANNING DIVISION (Matthew Herrera, 253-835-2638, matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com)
1. Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designation — The subject property is zoned Single -Family High
Density Residential RS 9.6. Future plans for single-family housing on these lots are consistent with
the city's land use and density policies for this area.
2. Clearing and Grading Plan Approval — The proposed driveway construction prior to obtaining
single-family building permits for the subject properties will require clearing and grading plan
approval via consolidated Use Process application as the activity is not expressly exempt in FVWRC
19.120.030. The applicant is required to meet the following criteria for use approval:
a. It will not alter or adversely affect critical areas on or off the subject property;
b. It will not violate any express policy of the city; and
c. It meets at least one of the following criteria:
i. It is necessary to correct an erosion or drainage problem on an undeveloped site;
ii. It is necessary to create new utility or access corridors;
iii. Other unusual circumstances exist which make it reasonable to permit clearing,
grading, and/or tree and vegetation removal in advance of the issuance of a
development permit.
The clearing and grading plan, prepared by a professional engineer, is required to include the
following mfo>ivation:
a. Identification of existing and proposed grades.
b. Location of all existing and/or proposed structures, driveways, right-of-way improvements,
utilities, and easements on the subject property.
c. Designation of critical areas.
d. Areas proposed for clearing and the proposed use for such areas.
e. Any proposed grade changes that might adversely affect or endanger trees on the property
and/or adjacent properties, and specifications to maintain them.
f. A minimum of two cross sections of the site, drawn to scale, depicting the existing and
proposed grade and any proposed rockeries and/or retaining walls.
g. Location and description of proposed erosion -control devices and structures.
h. A statement outlining the purpose of any proposed tree removal (e.g. driveway
construction), together with a proposed timetable for when the work will occur.
i. A depiction of the spatial limits for tree/vegetation retention areas and details of tree/
vegetation protection measures.
j. A depiction of any new vegetated areas to be established.
k. The manner in which the cleared areas on the property will be reclaimed with vegetation,
specification of any required mitigation plantings, and a timetable for replanting.
1. Calculation of tree unit credits for each lot after driveway construction.
3. Environmental Constraints — As shown on the submitted site plan, two Category III wetlands and
one stream is located on the subject property. In January 2007, the city's wetland consultant
confirmed the applicant's wetland delineation and Category III classification. The city also identified
50-foot setbacks for each wetland as their sizes were greater than 10,000 square feet. It appears
stream delineation was also confirmed but a rating was not established during the 2007 review.
12-101079 Doc. LD. 60649
Mr. LaBrie
Page 3
April 10, 2012
As a component of the consolidated Use Process review, the applicant will be required to update the
wetland delineation reports and identify any changes to their boundaries and/or classification. The
stream will also need to be rated major or minor in order to establish the appropriate mitigation plan
for the driveway encroachment. Alternatively, the department can proceed with review without
further stream classification analysis and assume the stream is rated major for the purposes of this
permitting action. Please be advised any fish blockage must be natural and therefore disqualifies the
human made culvert at South 330 Street as the blockage point.
Proposed encroachment into the stream buffer will require approval via consolidated Use Process
review. The applicant is required to develop a plan that addresses the following criteria set forth in
FWRC 19.165.070(3):
a. It will not adversely affect water quality;
b. It will not adversely affect the existing quality of wildlife habitat within the stream or setback
area;
c. It will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention capabilities;
d. It will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards;
e. It will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area of the subject property nor
to the city as a whole, including the loss of significant open space; and
f. It is necessary for reasonable development of the subject property.
Mitigation plans will likely need review by the city's third party environmental consultant. The
applicant is responsible for review costs.
4. Consolidated Use Process IV Application — Review for the clearing and grading plan approval and
stream encroachment require different levels of process, Use Process III and Use Process IV
respectively. Therefore, the applications will be consolidated into a single Use Process IV application
pursuant to FWRC 19.15.060. Under Process IV, the city's hearing examiner will make the initial
decision following a public hearing. The applicant has the responsibility of persuading the hearing
examiner by a preponderance of the evidence that the applicant is entitled to the requested decision.
The Planning Division will notify the applicant of application status within 28 days of submittal. If
the application is determined complete, staff will issue a Letter of Complete Application and begin
the public notification process. FWRC 19.70.150(2)(b) provides the Hearing Examiner up to 120 days
to issue a written decision on the land use application. The 120-day review period will stop whenever
staff requests corrections or additional information from the applicant. The review period will begin
within 14 days following submittal of requested items. Please be advised that any request for
corrections and/or additional information must be provided within 180 days of written notification or
the land use application shall expire.
In addition to clearing/grading and stream buffer encroachment approval criteria, the applicant will be
required to meet the following Process IV decisional criteria:
a. It is consistent with the comprehensive plan;
b. It is consistent with all applicable provisions of this title and all other applicable laws;
c. It is consistent with the public health, safety and welfare;
d. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the
anticipated demand from the proposal;
e. The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration for
access; and
12-101079 Doc. LD. 60649
Mr. LaBrie
Page 4
April 10, 2012
f. Traffic safety impacts for all modes of transportation, both on and off site, are adequately
mitigated.
A staff report with analysis of the application and recommendation will be made available to the
applicant and public at least seven calendar days prior to the public hearing.
5. Tree and Vegetation Retention — Tree removal within the driveway easement will be exempt from
meeting canopy standards. Any tree removal outside the easement will require each lot to maintain
the minimum 25 tree unit per acre canopy density. The applicant will be required to demonstrate on
the clearing and grading plan that tree unit requirements have or will be met. Tree unit credits are
assigned per the following chart for retained and replaced trees.
Retained Trees
Tree Unit Credit
Existing Tree 1" to 6" d.b.h.
1.0 tree units per tree retained
Existing Tree > 6" to 12" d.b.h.
1.5 tree units per tree retained
Existing Tree > 12" to 18" d.b.h.
2.0 tree units per tree retained
Existing Tree > 18" to 24" d.b.h.
2.5 tree units per tree retained
Existing Tree > 24" d.b.h.
3.0 tree units per tree retained
Replacement Trees
Tree Unit Credit
Small Canopy Species (Mature canopy area < 450 SF)
.50 tree units per tree planted
Medium Canopy Species (Mature canopy area 450 to 1,250 SF)
1.0 tree units per tree planted
Large Canopy Species (Mature canopy area > 1,250 SF)
1.5 tree units per tree planted
6. Public Notice — The city will provide a notice of application detailing the proposed action, invite
public comment, and make available documents for public review. The comment period will be open
for written comments up to the recorded public hearing. The notice will be sent to all property owners
within 300 feet of the subject property, published in the Federal Way Mirror, posted on the city
notification boards, and posted on the subject property. The applicant is responsible for submitting
two sets (one for application and one for public hearing) of stamped mailing envelopes for property
owners within 300 feet of the subject property. The city's GIS Division can provide this service for a
nominal fee. Please see the enclosed handout for further information.
7. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) —As proposed, the project would be exempt from SEPA
review as it meets categorical exemption WAC 197-11-800(2)(d) — grading activities necessary for
the construction of less than nine dwelling units.
8. Fees —Current fees for the Use Process IV application are $3961.50 and do not include third party
environmental review costs or engineering plan review fees. Please contact a Development Specialist
in the department's Permit Center at 253-835-2607 prior to submitting your application for updated
application fees.
12-101079 Doc. LD. 60649
Mr. LaBrie
Page 5
April 10, 2012
PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION (Ann Dower, 253-835-2732,
ann.dower@cityoffederalway.com)
Land Use Issues — Stormwater
1. Surface water runoff control and water quality treatment will be required per the 2009 King County
Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the City of Federal Way Addendum to the 2009
KCSWDM. Assuming this project results in between 2,000 and 10,000 square feet of new impervious
area, Targeted Drainage Review, will be required. At the time of land use site plan submittal, a
preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR), addressing the relevance of the project to the eight
core and five special requirements of the KCSWDM, will be required. A Level 1 downstream
analysis shall also be provided in the TIR. The City has 1" = 100', five-foot contour planimetric maps
that may be used for basin analysis.
2. The project lies within a Conservation Flow Control Area, thus the applicant must design the flow
control facility to meet this performance criteria. Best Management Practices, such as pervious
paving, infiltration trenches, etc. as outlined in the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual,
are encouraged. The project also lies within an Enhanced Basic Water Quality Area. If the new
impervious area is 5,000 square feet or more, water quality treatment shall be provided meeting the
treatment criteria of the Enhanced Basic Water Quality Menu.
3. If infiltration is proposed, soil logs prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer or septic designer
must be provided to verify infiltration suitability.
4. Detention and water quality facilities must be above ground (i.e. open pond). Underground vault -type
facilities are allowed only with approval from the City of Federal Way Stormwater Management
Division.
5. Show the proposed location and dimensions of the detention and water quality facilities on the
preliminary plans.
6. If more than one acre will be disturbed during construction, a National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit may be required. Information regarding this permit can be
obtained from the Washington State Department of Ecology at
hU://www.egy.wa.gov/12ro,arams/se4lpac/index.htm , or by calling 360-407-6437.
7. If work is to be done below the ordinary high water mark, a Hydraulic Project Approval (ETA)
permit may be required. Information regarding this permit can be obtained from the Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife, at h :/Iwww.wa. ov/wdfw/hab/h a a ethtm or by calling the
office of Regulator Assistance at 360-407-7037.
Right -of -Way Improvements
See the Traffic Division comments from Sarady Long, Sr. Transportation Planning Engineer, for traffic
related items.
12-101079 Doc LD.60649
Mr. LaBrie
Page 6
April 10, 2012
Engineering Permit Issues
1. Engineered plans are required for clearing, grading, road construction, and utility work. Plans must be
reviewed and approved by the City. Engineering review fees are $549.50 for the first 8 hours of
review, and $68 per hour for additional review time. A final TIR shall be prepared for the project and
submitted with the engineering plans. Both the TIR and the plans will require the signature/seal of a
professional engineer registered/licensed in the State of Washington.
2. The Federal Way Development Standards Manual (including standard detail drawings, standard
notes, and engineering checklists) is available on the City's website at www.cityoffederalway.com to
assist the applicant's engineer in preparing the plans and TIR.
Bonding is required for all street and storm water improvements associated with the project. The bond
amount shall be 120 percent of the estimated costs of the improvements. An administrative fee
deposit will need to accompany the bond to cover any possible legal fees in the event the bond must
be called. Upon completion of the installation of the improvements, and final approval of the Public
Works Inspector, the bond will be reduced to 30 percent of the original amount and held for a two-
year maintenance period.
4. The developer will be responsible for the maintenance of all storm drainage facilities (including the
detention and water quality facilities) and street systems during the two-year maintenance period.
During that time, the Public Works Inspector will make periodic visits to the site to ensure the
developer's compliance with the maintenance requirements. Upon satisfactory completion of the two-
year maintenance period, the remainder of the bond will be released. Maintenance for public roads
and subdivision drainage facilities then become the responsibility of the City. Maintenance for private
roads and drainage facilities, including short plats, remain the responsibility of the individual property
owners. The City will conduct yearly inspections of the facilities and notify the property owners if
cleaning or repairs are needed.
5. When topographic survey information is shown on the plans, the vertical datum block shall include
the phrase "DATUM: N.G.V.D.-29" or "DATUM: K.C.A.S.," on all sheets where vertical elevations
are called out.
Drawings submitted for plan review shall be printed on 24" x 36" or 22" x 34" paper. All final
approved drawings shall be drafted/plotted on 24" x 36" or 22" x 34" mylar sheet with permanent
black ink. Site plans shall be drawn at a scale of V = 20', or larger. Architectural scales are not
permitted on engineering plans.
7. Provide cut and fill quantities on the clearing and grading plan. Erosion control measures, per
Appendix D, 2009 KCSWDM, must be shown on the engineering plans.
8. The site plan shall show the location of any existing and proposed utilities in the areas affected by
construction.
12-101079 Doe. LD. 60649
Mr. LaBrie
Page 7
April 10, 2012
PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC DIVISION (Sarady Long, 253-835-2743, sarady.long@cityoffederalway.com)
Transportation Concurrency Analysis (FWRC 19.90)
A concurrency permit is not required for this project to only construct a driveway for the two adjacent
vacant lots; however, a concurrency permit will be required for the two vacant lots at such time building
permit applications are submitted. The estimated fee for the concurrency permit application is $344.50 (1
-10 Trips). The applicant has the option of having an independent traffic engineer prepare the
concurrency analysis consistent with City procedures; however, the fee remains the same.
Transportation Impact Fees (FWRC 19.91) / Access
1. The City of Federal Way has adopted a Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) program effective July 1,
2010. The estimated TIF for the 2 vacant lots is $6.412.
2. All lots shall be accessed by a public street right-of-way (FWRC 18.55.020). In certain cases, lots
may be accessed by an ingress/egress and utilities easement or alley subject to the requirements
established in the City of Federal Way Public Works development standards. The driveway must be
constructed to cross section standards per DWG 3-2CC (Private Driveway Serving 2 lots).
3. A streetlight will be required at the intersection of a vehicular access easement and a right-of-way per
FWRC 19.135.100 (3).
SOUTH KING FIRE AND RESCUE (Chris Ingham, 253-946-7244, chris.ingham@southkingfire.org)
In lieu of a turnaround and 20-foot paved roadway, the two future homes on Lots A and B will need
automatic sprinkler systems.
CLOSING
This letter reflects the information provided at the preapplication meeting and is intended to assist you in
preparing plans and materials for formal application. We hope you found the comments useful to your
project. We have made every effort to identify major issues to eliminate surprises during the City's
review of the formal application. The completion of the preapplication process in the content of this letter
does not vest any future project application. Comments in this letter are only valid for one year as per
FWRC 19.40.070 (4).
As you know, this is a preliminary review only and does not take the place of the full review that will
follow submission of a formal application. Comments provided in this letter are based on preapplication
materials submitted.
Modifications and revisions to the project as presented for this preapplication may influence and modify
information regarding development requirements outlined above. In addition to this preapplication letter,
please examine the complete FWRC and other relevant codes carefully. Requirements that are found in
the codes that are not addressed in this letter are still required for your project.
If you have questions about an individual comment, please contact the appropriate department
representative noted above. Any general questions can be directed towards the key project contact,
Matthew Elerrera, 253-835-2638. We look forward to working with you.
12-101079 Doc. LD. 60649
Mr. LaBrie
Page 8
April 10, 2012
Sincer ,
Matthew Herrera
Associate Planner
enc: Bulletin 001 "Process IV Submittal Requirements"
Bulletin 002 "Mailing Labels"
Bulletin 003 "Master Land Use Application'
Public Works Development Standard DWG 3-2CC
Mr. Richard Pierson, 3516 South 336th Street, Federal Way, WA 98001
Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer
Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer
Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue
12-101079 Doc. I.D. 60649
Pre -application Conference Sign in Sheet
City of Federal Way
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
March 29, 2012
9:00 am.
Project Name: Pierson Driveway
Address: APN 614360-0657
File Number: 12-10107900-PC
NAME I DEPARTMENT / DIVISION
1.
2.
3_
5.
6. G'6�%�/s /A)
7.
a
10
11
12.
". �:,_ t ,-1�-5
L. 4-j Q Q L",44__
City Hall
Hylebos Room
TELEPHONE NUMBER
�3-��S-Z-732
3'839-W
zs 3 835 &c/3
;2,53 9 V6 7-2 y
c n N s u L T INA E N G I "tal �+q I
March 8, 2012
Mr. Isaac Conlen
City of Federal Way
Community & Economic Development
33325 8th Ave S.
Federal Way, WA 98003
RE: Pierson Property Driveway, APN 614360-0657
Request for Pre -Application Meeting
Dear Isaac:
Job No. 1738-001-012
RECEIVED
MARA 8 1:)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CDS
With this letter and accompanying materials, we are requesting a pre -application meeting
to discuss the construction of a driveway within an existing access easement at the
above referenced property. The property has previously been reviewed by the City under
file #06-105384-AD.
As depicted in the attached BLA, recorded in June of 2005, a seasonal stream
encompasses approximately 930 sf of the site. At the time of recording, this was
considered a Class III stream requiring a 25-foot buffer. However, this stream is now rated
under Federal Way's revised classification system as a Minor Stream and the 50' buffer
associated with this stream now encumbers part of the area within the ingress/egress
easement previously recorded on the face of the BLA.
The applicant wishes to construct a driveway to access lots A and B within the recorded
easement. This proposal appears to be the most reasonable way to access these lots
without causing greater impacts to other existing onsite wetlands. In order to construct
the proposed driveway, construction activities within the stream setback will be required.
Process IV — Intrusion into Stream Setback
A peer review report prepared by Otak and dated January 29, 2007 identifies the onsite
stream and outlines an opinion regarding its classification. Otak states that "although we
agree that this ditch is not utilized by anadromous fish, it must be determined that a
natural migration barrier occurs downstream of the property" in order to be considered
minor. This criteria has been met as the stream is now culverted directly across S. 330
Street downstream of the site. This migration barrier serves as evidence that the onsite
stream is a "minor stream" requiring a 50-foot setback from the ordinary high water mark.
Per FWRC 19.165.070, an intrusion into a stream setback (other than for essential facilities
and minor improvements) may only be granted through Process IV. With this in mind, it is
our intention to apply for approval of this proposed intrusion through Process IV. In order
to intrude into the stream setback, we understand that the proposal must demonstrate
the following:
ESM Federal Way ESM Everett Civil Engineering Land Planning
181 S 333rd St. Bldg C. Ste 210 1010 SE Everett Mall Way. Ste 210
Federal Way. WA 98003 Everett. WA 98208 Land surveying Landscape Architecture
3D Laser Scanning GIS
213.838.6113 let 425.297.9900te1
800.345.5694 loll free 166.415.6144 loll free www.esmcivil corn
253.838.7104tax 425.2 9 7.9901 tax
Mr. Isaac Conlen
March 8, 2012
Page Two
■ It will not adversely affect water quality;
■ It will not adversely affect the existing quality of wildlife habitat within the stream or
setback area;
• It will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention capabilities;
• It will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards;
• It will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area of the subject
property nor to the city as a whole, including the loss of significant open space;
and
• It is necessary for reasonable development of the subject property.
From an email sent by Deb Barker dated February 24, 2012, we understand that SEPA will
not be required for this proposal "pursuant to FWRC 14.30.040."
Clearing & Grading Permit — Construction of Driveway
In addition to being reviewed under Process IV for a stream setback intrusion, this
proposal is anticipated to trigger review under FWRC 19.120, Clearing and Grading. We
hope for this review to occur concurrently so that upon final land use approval
construction activities can begin.
If you have any questions or if I can provide any additional information, please do not
hesitate to contact me at 253-838-6113 or andy.campbell@esmcivil.com. As always, we
look forward to working closely with the City on this project.
Sincerely,
ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, L.L.C.
AND CAMPBELL
Planner & GIS Analyst
Enclosures
gAesm-jobs11738\001101 MocumenNetter-001.doc
—'q'kV"
MA
4w, . T A
Or
pre,
CITY OF
1�kFederal
March 14, 2012
Andy Campbell
ESM Consulting Engineers LLC
181 South 3331d Street, Suite 210
Federal Way, WA 98003
Way
F I L
CITY HALL
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
(253) 835-7000
www.cityoffederalway.com
RE: File #12-101079-00-PC; PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED
Pierson Driveway, Parcel 614360-0657, Federal Way
Dear Mr. Campbell:
The Community and Economic Development Department is in receipt of your preapplication conference
request. The application has been routed to members of the Development Review Committee and a
meeting with the project applicant has been scheduled as follows:
9:00 a.m. — Thursday, March 29, 2012
Hylebos Conference Room
Federal Way City Hall, 2nd Floor
33325 8d` Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
We look forward to meeting with you. Please coordinate directly with anyone else you would like to
attend the meeting as this will be the only notice sent out by the department. If you have any questions
regarding the meeting, please contact me at matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com, or 253-835-2638.
Sincerely,
Matthew Herrera
Associate Planner
c: Richard Pierson, 3516 South 336`h Street, Federal Way, WA 98001
Doc, I.D. 60644
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL
DATE:
vrn;
FROM:
FOR DRCMTG. ON.
FILE NUMBER(s):
RELATED FILE NOS.:
PROTECT NAME
PROJECT ADDRESS
ZONING DISTRICT:
March 14, 2012
Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer
Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official
Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District
Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue
Matt Herrera, Associate Planner
March 22, 2012 - Internal
March 29, 2012 9:00am - with applicant
12-101079-00-PC
06-105384-AD
PIERSON DRIVEWAY
APN 614360-0657
RS 9.6
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to construct a driveway on one vacant lot for the benefit of
two adjacent vacant lots prior to submitting single-family building permits.
Possible stream and wetland impacts
LAND USE PERMITS: Preapplication
PROJECT CONTACT: ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS LLC
ANDY CAMPBELL
181 333an ST Suite 210
MATERMLS SUBMITTED: Narrative and BLA survey
RECEIVED MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
,r'� MAR 0 8 2012 33325 8'h Avenue South
CITY OF tie Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
Federal Way-rYOF FEDERAL WAY 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
CDS www.citvoffedcralway.com
APPLICATION NO(s) I r 0 t o-_�q —0 — \ Date 3 / 0 8 / 2 012
Project Name Pierson Pro erty Driveway
Property Address/Location Approx. 3700 S 3 3 4 th St
Parcel Numbers) 6143600657
Project Description Construction of a driveway within a presently recorded easement to
provide access to 2 existing lots
PKIlv'1
Type of Permit Required
Annexation
Binding Site Plan
Boundary Line Adjustment
Comp Plan/Rezone
Land Surface Modification
Lot Line Elimination
X Preapplication Conference
Process I (Director's Approval)
Process II (Site Plan Review)
Process III (Project Approval)
Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision)
Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone)
Process VI
SEPA w/Project
SEPA Only
Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use
Short Subdivision
Subdivision
Variance: Commercial/Residential
Required Information
RS 9 . 6 Zoning Designation
SFHD Comprehensive Plan Designation
-Value of Existing Improvements
Value of Proposed Improvements
International Building Code (IBC):
Occupancy Type
Construction Type
Applicant
Name: See "Owner"
Address:
City/State:
Zip:
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
Signature:
Agent (if different than Applicant)
Name:ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC
Address:181 S 333rd St Bldg. C, Ste. 210
City/State: Federal Way, WA
Zip:98003
Phone: (253) 838-6113
Fax: (253) 838-7104
Email:andy.ca Abell@esmcivil.com
Signature:
Owner
Name: Richard Pierson
Address:3516 South 336th Street
City/state: Federal Way, WA
Zip: 98001
Phone: (253) 927-7465
Fax:
Email: econoforester@msn. com
Signature:
Bulletin #003 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application