Loading...
15-105662-PC24`112e y December 11, 2015 Jim Ferrell, Mayor Mark McDonald NWCC Center Plaza, LLC 1402 East Pike Street Seattle, WA 98122 Re: File #15-105662-00-PC, PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY NWCC Center Plaza (MOD Pizza), 2104 & 2032 South 320`h Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. McDonald: Thank you for participating in the preapplication conference with the City of Federal Way's Development Review Committee (DRC) held December 3, 2015. We hope that the information discussed at that meeting was helpful in understanding the general requirements for your project as submitted. This letter summarizes comments given to you at the meeting by the members of the DRC. The members who reviewed your project and provided comments include staff from the City's Planning and Building Divisions and Public Works Department, and representatives from Lakehaven Utility District and South King Fire and Rescue. Some sections of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) and relevant information handouts are enclosed with this letter. Please be advised, this letter does not represent all applicable codes. in preparing your formal application, please refer to the complete FWRC and other relevant codes for all additional requirements that may apply to your project. The key contact for your project is Becky Chapin, 253-835-2641, becky.chapin@cityoffederalway.com. For specific technical questions about your project, please contact the appropriate DRC representative as listed below. Otherwise, any general questions about the preapplication and permitting process can be referred to your key contact. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is proposing to expand the existing bank building and canopy to 3,000 sq. ft. for a new restaurant. Site improvements and new pedestrian connection to the adjacent retail buildings is proposed, A phase II addition is planned to expand the existing Starbucks building to 2,000 sq. ft., with revised drive thru and additional outdoor plaza. MAJOR ISSUES Outlined below is a summary of the major issues of your project based on the plans and information submitted for preapplication review. These issues can change due to modifications and revisions in the plans. These major issues only represent comments that the DRC consider most significant to your project and do not include the majority of the comments provided. The major issues section is only provided as a means to highlight critical requirements or issues. Please be sure to read the entire department comments made in the next section of this letter. 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Mr. McDonald Page 2 December 11. 2015 + Planning Division ■ No more than a five-foot building setback is allowed adjacent to principal pedestrian right(s)-of- way, unless waived by the Director of Community Development. • The development/site improvements are considered nonconforming with regards to development standards: The applicant has two options to proceed with the proposed addition pursuant to FWRC 19.30.090; see note 5 below for more details. • Public Works Development Services Division The applicant is advised that the City expects to adopt a new stormwater manual in 2016. While it's not known at this time when adoption of a new manual is expected, we feel it's important to provide this information so that the owner/applicant is aware of this upcoming change. If the applicant submits a complete Land Use application after City adoption of a new manual, then the project will be subject to the stormwater regulations and requirements of that manual. If the applicant submits a complete Land Use application before adoption of the new manual, then the project is subject to the stormwater requirements of the current (2009) King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), and City addendum to the manual. ■ Public Works Traffic Division 1. A Transportation Concurrency permit is required per FWRC Chapter 19.90. 2. Street frontage improvements and right-of-way dedication are required along the property frontage on S 3201h Street and 21" Avenue S per FWRC 19.135.040., 3. Traffic Impact Fee payment per FWRC 19.91. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Outlined below are the comments made by the representatives of each department present at the preapplication conference. Each section should be read thoroughly. If you have questions, please contact the representative listed for that section. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING DIVISION Beckv Chapin, 253-835-2641. becky.chapin(a cityoffederalway.com Land Use Designation — The subject property is within the City Center Core (CC-C) zone. Restaurants, fast-food restaurants are permitted in CC-C zones subject to regulations set forth in FWRC 19.225.020. The following information is based on the materials submitted for the preapplication meeting. 2. Land Use Application — Process H— Site Plan Review The proposed modification to Starbucks and new MOD Pizza building can be combined into one land use application for review. The improvements will require a Process II Master Land Use application per FWRC 19.15.030. Process II is an administrative site plan review conducted by city staff with a final decision issued by the Community Development Director. 3. Environmental Review — As proposed, the project is exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) as the proposal does not exceed flexible thresholds (buildings larger than 12,000 square feet, additional parking for 40 or more vehicles). 15-105662 Doc I D 71406 Mr. McDonald Page 3 December 11, 2015 4. Fees — The formal application must be prepared in accordance with the City's Development Requirements checklist (enclosed) and must be accompanied by the appropriate fees. As fees change annually, please contact the Permit Center for the current application fees for Use Process II and other permits/reviews identified in this letter. The Permit Center can be reached at 253-835-2607 or pen,nitcenter@cityoffederalway.com. 5. Nonconformance — The existing site is nonconforming with regard to site development standards. As discussed in the preapplication meeting, there are two options for proceeding with regards to nonconforming development and the proposed expansion of gross floor area. 1) The individual parcel proposed for redevelopment is operated as a single property — including both the former Key Bank site and/or the Starbucks site. Per FWRC 19.30.090(1)(a) all nonconforming aspects of the development must be brought into conformance if either 2,500 sq. feet of new gross floor area or more is added, or 25 percent of the gross floor area or more is added to the building(s) on the subject property, whichever is less. In this case, if the proposed addition exceeds the 25 percent threshold, the entire site must be brought into conformance with current codes. 2) Alternatively, the entire site owned by NWCC Center Plaza, LLC, may be operated as the subject property. This includes existing buildings A, B, C, D and E. Pursuant to FWRC 19.30.090(2)(a), buildings (or groups of buildings) greater than or equal to 50,000 square feet are required to be brought into conformance if the applicant proposes to add 4,900 square feet of new gross floor area or ten percent of the gross floor area of the buildings on the subject property, whichever is greater, within any consecutive 36-month time period. The proposed redevelopment for MOD Pizza and Starbucks remodel would not trigger this nonconformance threshold. Any future development on the site that exceeds the 10 percent threshold as stated above will require all development and improvements on the subject property to meet current code requirements. This may include removing the Starbucks drive -through; as drive -through fast food restaurants are not allowed in the CC-C zone. Mee Ih?gfollow-zr — Based on discussion at the meeting, option 2 is applicable. As such, the remaining sections below outline the development requirements for the proposed MOD Pizza/Starbucks addition/remodel as it relates to the larger four -lot subject property. 6. Key Development Regulations — FWRC 19.225.040, Entertainment, provides specific design and use requirements for the proposed restaurant building. The formal site plan must include the following: a. Required Setback and Lot Coverage — There are zero required setback requirements for retail and restaurant uses (see section d below for discussion of max setbacks.) No maximum lot coverage applies. The buildable area will be determined by other requirements for landscaping, required yards, etc. b. Building Height — The allowed height for a restaurant building in the CC-C zone is 70 feet. As proposed, the project meets this requirement. 15-10566- Doc I D 71406 Mr. McDonald Page 4 December l i _ 2015 c. Parking — Parking requirements from the CC-C zone use chart are as follows: ■ Restaurant — 1 parking stall for each 100 square feet of gross floor area. ■ Fast Food Restaurant — 1 for each 80 square feet of gross floor area. For the proposed buildings depicted on the preapplication site plan, the 3,000 sq. ft. MOD Pizza restaurant would require 30 stalls and the proposed addition to the Starbucks site would require 20 stalls, for a total of 50 parking stalls. The preapplication site plan depicted 35 parking stalls on the subject site. There is also mention of shared parking with the property to the north. As such, a shared parking agreement will be required pursuant to FWRC 19.130.120, Shared Facilities. d. Special Regulations and Notes from Zone Use Chart — ■ No more than a five-foot building setback is allowed adjacent to principal pedestrian right(s)-of-way, as detennined by the director, unless: it is precluded by existing site improvements, easements, topography, or other site constraints, as detennined by the director; or to allow streetscape amenities, public on -site open space, or other architectural element(s) or improvements approved under Chapter 19.115 FWRC. The minimum building setback along all other property lines is the same as the perimeter buffer as required by Chapter 19.125 FWRC. 21" Avenue South is considered the principal pedestrian right-of-way. The added addition to the MOD Pizza building should be set back no more than 5 feet from 215' Avenue South, unless a greater setback is supported based on circumstances as noted above. 7. Landscaping — The Process 11 application must include a preliminary landscape plan in accordance with the landscape requirements contained in FWRC Chapter 19.125 "Outdoors, Yards, and Landscaping. " Following are the key landscape requirements for the project. a. Perimeter Landscape Buffers — FWRC 19.125.060(7), City Center, CC, requires a minimum of Type III landscaping five feet in width along the perimeter of parking areas abutting public rights -of -way. FWRC 19.125.070(5) requires parking areas to be screened with either a three- foot -tall berm installed within the perimeter landscaping buffer, architectural features, or substantial plantings added to the landscaping. This is required for the new parking areas abutting South 320`" Street and 2151 Avenue South. Type III landscaping consists of a mixture of evergreen and deciduous trees, large shrubs a minimum of 24 inches in height at the time of planting, and groundcover; spaced to provide a visual buffer creating a partial visual separation. Interior Parking Lot Landscaping — Any new parking stalls that are added to the site are required to meet the interior parking lot landscape requirements for those stalls. Pursuant to FWRC 19.125.070, commercial developments shall provide twenty (20) square feet of interior lot landscaping per parking space when up to 49 parking stalls are required. Type IV landscaping shall be provided within surface parking areas to break up large areas of impervious surfaces, mitigate adverse impacts created by vehicle use areas, facilitate the movement of traffic, and improve the physical appearance of vehicle use areas. The square footage of interior lot landscaping must be listed on the landscape plan, and the interior landscape areas used for this calculation must be identified on the plan. I S_10566, Doc ID 71406 Mr. McDonald Page 5 December 11. 2015 8. Community Design Guidelines — Projects subject to Process II review must comply with the provisions of FWRC Chapter 19.115, "Community Design Guidelines." The proposed restaurant must comply with applicable portions of the Community Design Guideline standards, including the CC-C zone specific guidelines. This correspondence highlights the primary applicable design guidelines for the restaurant and retail project, but does not necessarily identify all applicable design requirements. The formal Process II application must include a written narrative that identifies how the proposal complies with the applicable design guidelines, as outlined in the FWRC and summarized below. FWRC 19.115.090(3)(a). Parking shall be located behind building(s), with building located between the right-of-way and the parking area(s) and any parking located along a right-of-way is subject to the following criteria: i. In the city center core, surface parking and driving areas may not occupy more than 25 percent of the project's linear frontage along principal pedestrian right(s)-of-way. A greater amount of parking and driving area than is specified in subsections (3)(a)(i) of this section may be located along other rights -of -way; provided, that the parking is not the predominant use along such right-of-way, as determined by the director. The existing parking lot configuration and drive aisles do not meet this requirement; however, the site does not need to be brought into compliance at this time. Any new stalls added cannot be located along a right-of-way; this includes the two new stalls as depicted on the site plan, located along Pacific Hwy South. FWRC 19.115.090(3)(b). Principal entrance facades shall front on, face, or be clearly recognizable from the right-of-way, and/or from the principal pedestrian right-of-way, as determined by the director, for projects exposed to more than one right-of-way. For the MOD Pizza site, entrance must be clearly recognizable from 2 1 " Avenue South. FWRC 19.115.090(3)(c). Building facades shall incorporate a combination of facade treatment options as listed in FWRC 19.115.060(2) and (3)(b), to a degree that is appropriate to the building size, scale, design, and site context and according to the following guidelines: i. Principle facades containing a major entrance, or located along a right-of-way, or clearly visible from a right-of-way or public sidewalk, shall incorporate a variety of pedestrian -oriented architectural treatments. At least 40 percent of any ground level principal facade located along a right-of-way must contain transparent glass. Landscaping shall be used to define and highlight building entrances, plazas, window planters, etc. Landscaping should not block views to the building or across the site. ii. Secondary facades not containing a major building entrance, or located along a right- of-way, or clearly visible from a right-of-way or public sidewalk, may incorporate facade treatments that are less pedestrian -oriented than in subsection (3)(c)(i), such as a combination of structural modulation, architectural articulation, and foundation landscaping. FWRC 19.115.090(3)(d). Pedestrian pathways shall be provided from rights -of -way, bus stops, parking areas, and any pedestrian plazas and public space to primary building entrances. Multiple tenant complexes shall provide pedestrian walkways connecting all major business entrances on I5-105662 Doc. LD 71406 Mr. McDonald Page 6 December 11, 2015 the site. This includes a pedestrian connection between the sidewalk along South 3201h Street and to the restaurant's main entrance. Pedestrian pathways shall be clearly delineated by separate paved routes using a variation in color and texture, shall be integrated with landscape plan, and shall be protected from abutting parking and vehicular circulation areas within landscaping. Meelingfollow-— If the applicant proposes to defer the pedestrian connection to the north where shared parking is proposed, please provide a written request including reason why the pedestrian connection cannot be made at this time, to be reviewed with the Process 1I application. FWRC 19.115.090(3)(e). Drive -through facilities and stacking lanes shall not be located along, or in conjunction with, a building facade that faces or is clearly visible from a right-of-way, public sidewalk, or pedestrian plaza. Such facilities shall be. located along other secondary facades, as detennined by the director, and shall meet the separation screening, and design standards listed in FWRC 19.115.050(7)(b)(ii), (iii), and (iv). As a drive -through restaurant is not typically permitted in this zone, the City will allow the existing drive -through to remain and stacking lane be modified since nonconformance thresholds are not being triggered; however, the re -configured stacking lane must meet the above code requirements for separation screening and design standards. FWRC 19.115.050(6). Commercial services related to loading, storage, trash and recycling should be located in such a manner as to optimize public circulation and minimize visibility into such facilities. Service areas shall be designed and located for easy access by service vehicles. Trash and recycling receptacles shall include cover to prevent odor and wind-blown litter. The enclosure shall be consistent with the primary buildings relative to architecture, materials, and color. 9. Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) — FWRC 19.1 15.010(2) CPTED, requires minimum standards for design review to reduce the rate of crime associated with persons and property, thus providing for the highest standards of public safety. CPTED principles are: 1) natural surveillance; 2) access control; and 3) ownership. The enclosed CPTED checklist must be completed and submitted with the formal application, and CPTED principles should be incorporated into the project as applicable. 10. Garbage/Recycling — FWRC 19.125.150 requires that storage areas for garbage and recycling receptacles be required for all new commercial developments. The formal application must note the specific size, design, location, and screening of garbage receptacles as required by FWRC 19.125.150 and 19.125.040. Locations for the recycling and garbage facilities, and any fencing or screening details, must be depicted on the formal site plan. See Public Works comments below for additional information. 15-105662 Doc I D 71406 Mr. McDonald Page 7 December 11, 2015 PUBLIC WORKS - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION Kevin Peterson 253-835-2734. kevin. etersonnci offederalway.com Land Use Issues — Stormwater 1. Surface water runoff control and water quality treatment will be required per the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the City of Federal Way Addendum to the 2009 KCSWDM. This project meets the requirements for a Full Drainage Review. At the time of land use site plan submittal, a preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR) addressing the relevance of the project to the eight core and five special requirements of the KCSWDM will be required. A Level 1 downstream analysis shall also be provided in the preliminary TIR. The City has 1" = 100', five-foot contour planimetric maps that may be used for basin analysis. 2. The project lies within a Conservation flow control area, thus the applicant must design the flow control facility to meet this performance criteria. In addition to flow control facilities, Best Management Practices (BMP's) are required as outlined in the KCSWDM. The project also lies within an Enhanced Basic Water Quality Area. Water Quality Treatment shall be designed to meet the treatment criteria of the Enhanced Basic Water Quality Menu. In addition to the KCSWDM, our initial review suggests that FWRC Section 19.30.120, "Nonconforming Water Quality Improvements" applies to this site. Specifically, the following item(s) is(are) applicable: l .c. Redevelopment which involves the repair or replacement of 5,000 square feet or more of an impervious surface, when such redevelopment is not part of a routine maintenance activity; 1.g. Redevelopment, other than normal maintenance or other than the tenant improvements, but including any increase in gross floor area, in any one consecutive 12-month period which exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value (whichever is greater) of the structure or improvement being redeveloped. The applicant may provide an appraisal of the improvement. The appraisal must be from a source acceptable to the City. The Director may require the applicant to provide an appraisal from a second source acceptable to the City if the assessed valuation appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. If more than one appraisal is provided by the applicant or required by the City, the greater of the two amounts shall be used. For purposes of this determining value under this section, improvements required pursuant to FWRC Sections 19.30.090 (nonconforming development), 19.30.1 10 (street/sidewalk improvements), 19.30.120 (nonconforming water quality improvements) and 19.135.030 (street/sidewalk improvements) shall not be counted towards the 50 percent threshold which would trigger application of this subsection; Therefore, water quality treatment will be required for the entire site (Old Key Bank and Starbuck's parcels) including new and existing pollution generating impervious surfaces. Treatment options must be selected from the Enhanced Basic Water Quality Menu provided in the KCSWDM. Detention and water quality facilities for private commercial developments within the City Center Core may be placed underground. 5. Show the proposed location and dimensions of the detention and water quality facilities on the preliminary plans. 15-105662 Doc. I D 71406 Mr. McDonald Page 8 December 11. 2015 Right -of -Way Improvements 1. See the Traffic Division comments from Sarady Long, Sr. Transportation Planning Engineer, for traffic related items. 2. If dedication of additional right-of-way is required to install street frontage improvements, the dedication shall be conveyed to the City through a statutory warranty deed. The dedicated area must have clear title prior to recording. 3. All stonnwater treatment and detention requirements outlined above may apply to any improvements within the public right-of-way. Building Permit Issues 1. Engineered plans are required for clearing, grading, road construction, and utility work. Plans must be reviewed and approved by the City. Engineering review fees are $824.50 for the first 12 hours of review, and $68.50 per hour for additional review time (please note that these fees may increase on Jan. 1, 2016). A final TIR shall be prepared for the project and submitted with the engineering plans. Both the TIR and the plans will require the signature/seal of a professional engineer registered/licensed in the State of Washington. 2. The Federal Way Public Works Development Standards Manual (including standard detail drawings, standard notes, and engineering checklists) is available on the City's website at http:l/www.r-ityoffedera]M.com/index.asgx?nid=l71 to assist the applicant's engineer in preparing the plans and TIR. 3. Bonding is required for all street improvements and temporary erosion and sediment control measures associated with the project. The bond amount shall be 120 percent of the estimated costs of the improvements. An administrative fee deposit will need to accompany the bond to cover any possible legal fees in the event the bond must be called. Upon completion of the installation of the improvements, and final approval of the Public Works Inspector, the bond will be reduced to 30 percent of the original amount and held for a two-year maintenance period. 4. The developer will be responsible for the maintenance of all storm drainage facilities (including the detention and water quality facilities) and street systems during the two-year maintenance period. During that time, the Public Works Inspector will make periodic visits to the site to ensure the developer's compliance with the maintenance requirements. Upon satisfactory completion of the two-year maintenance period, the remainder of the bond will be released. Maintenance for public roads and subdivision drainage facilities then become the responsibility of the City. Maintenance for private roads and drainage facilities, including short plats, remain the responsibility of the individual property owners. 5. When topographic survey information is shown on the plans, the vertical datum block shall include the phrase "DATUM: N.G.V.D.-29" or "DATUM: K.C.A.S.," on all sheets where vertical elevations are called out. 6. Drawings submitted for plan review shall be printed on 24" x 36" or 22" x 34" paper. Site plans shall be drawn at a scale of 1 " = 20', or larger. Architectural scales are not permitted on engineering plans. 7. Provide cut and fill quantities on the clearing and grading plan. 8. Temporary Erosion and Sediment -control (TESL) measures, per Appendix D of the 2009 KCSWDM, just be shown on the engineering plans. 9. The site plan shall show the location of any existing and proposed utilities in the areas affected by construction. I1-105662 Doc ID 71406 Mr. McDonald Page 9 December 11, 2015 PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC DIVISION Sarady Lone, 253-835-2743, saradv.long(Zcityoffederalway.com Transportation Concurrency Analysis (FWRC 19.90) 1. A concurrency permit is required for this development project. The concurrency analysis will determine if adequate roadway capacity exists during the weekday PM peak period to accommodate the proposed development project. Please note that supplemental transportation analysis and concurrency mitigation may be required if the proposed project creates an impact not anticipated in the six -year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). Based on the submitted materials for a 3,000 square -foot restaurant, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation - 8'h Edition, land use code 932 (High Turnover Sit -Down Restaurant), the proposed project is estimated to generate approximately 19 new weekday PM peak hour trips. 3. The 2015 estimated fee for the concurrency permit application is $2,055 (11 - 50 Trips). This fee is an estimate and based on the materials submitted for the pre -application meeting. The concurrency application fee must be paid in full at the time the concurrency permit application is submitted with land use application. The fee may change based on the new weekday PM peak hour trips as identified in the concurrency trip generation. The applicant has the option of having an independent traffic engineer prepare the concurrency analysis consistent with City procedures; however, the fee remains the same. Transportation Impact Fees (TIF) (FWRC 19.91) Based on the submitted materials for a 3,000 square -foot restaurant, the estimated traffic impact fee is $26,229. Please note, the actual impact fee will be calculated based on the fee schedule in effect at the time a building permit application is filed and must be paid prior to pen -nit issuance. Street Frontage Improvements (FWRC 19.135) Based on the available records and the submitted materials, it appears that this proposal meets the 25 percent threshold criteria for requiring street frontage improvements as identified in the FWRC 19.135.030. The applicant/owner may submit an appraisal for the subject property, or King County Assessor's. records may be used. The Public Works Development Services Division will evaluate the submitted appraisal data to determine if the project actually meets the City's 25 percent threshold for requiring street frontage improvements. 2. The applicant/owner would be expected to construct street improvements consistent with the planned roadway cross -sections as shown in Map III-6 of the FWCP and Capital Improvement Program - (CIP) shown as Table III-19 (FWRC 19.135.040). Based on the materials submitted, staff conducted a limited analysis to determine the required street improvements. The applicant would be expected to construct improvements on the following streets to the City's planned roadway cross -sections if the ■ S 320"' Street is a Principal Arterial planned as a Type "B" street, consisting of an 84-foot street with curb and gutter, 8-foot sidewalks with street trees and decorative streetlights in a 100-foot right-of-way (ROW). S 320"' Street has been constructed to current standard and as such the applicant would not be expected to improve the frontage along S 320"' St. 15-105662 Doc I D 71406 Mr. McDonald Page 10 December IL 2015 2 1 " Ave S is a Minor Collector planned as a Type "Q" street, consisting of a 40-foot street with curb and gutter, 12-foot sidewalks with street trees and decorative streetlights in a 70- foot right-of-way (ROW). Assuming a symmetrical cross section, 5-foot ROW dedication and half street improvements are required as measured from the street centerline. The required improvement along the property frontage on 2151 Ave S is part of a larger project listed on the current adopted six -year transportation improvement program (TIP). As such, the Public Works director may request that the applicant.pay the city the pro-rata share of the project costs in lieu of constructing the improvement. 4. The owner may be required to dedicate additional right-of-way (ROW) to accommodate additional turn lane improvements if identified in the transportation analysis and/or property corner radius. The applicant may make a written request to the Public Works Director to modify, defer, or waive the required street improvements (FWRC 19.135.070). Please note that these modification requests have a nominal review fee. 6. Tapers and transitions beyond the project frontage may be required as deemed necessary for safety purposes, taper rate shall be WS" 2/60 or as directed by the Public Works Director. Access Management (FWRC 19.135) Driveways that serve uses other than single-family residential uses and zero lot line townhouse development; the maximum driveway width is 30 feet for a two-lane two-way driveway and 40 feet for a three -lane two-way driveway (FWRC 19.135.270). Driveway widths may be increased in order to provide adequate width for vehicles that may be reasonably expected to use the driveway, as determined by the Public Works Director. PUBLIC WORKS - SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING DIVISION Rob Van Orsow, 253-835-2770. robvfa@citvoffederalway.com cityoffederalway.com Solid Waste & Recycling Design Considerations Solid waste and recycling design considerations include: • Adequate space allocation for interior and exterior garbage, recycling, food waste, waste oil, yard debris, hazardous waste, or biohazard collection containers. Minimum recycling space allocation is established by FWRC 19.125.150. • For basic solid waste and recycling needs within a single enclosure, clear interior dimensions measuring 10' deep by 20' across are recommended, along with a two -door swing -open or roll - open gate that spans the front width of the enclosure. When gate doors are opened, no structure or hardware should remain above grade across the enclosure opening. Gate pins/holes are preferred for holding gates in closed and open positions to ease service access and maximize the life of gate hardware. • Sites may require a larger enclosure, or multiple enclosures, to accommodate on -site user access and/or additional waste types and containers. • Plan for user access to interior waste and recycling storage areas/containers, and to exterior containers screened by enclosure(s). I5-105662 Doe. LD. 71406 Mr. McDonald Page I I December 11. 2015 Plan for unobstructed, safe enclosure ingress and egress for service vehicles, directly in line with enclosure openings. Allow appropriate turning radii for service vehicles, and minimize potential `blind spots' during ingress and egress. Consider landscaping, setbacks and screening requirements [based on FWRC Section 19.125.040 (4) & (5)]. Note that larger -scale commercial or multi -unit housing developments may see long-term savings from the use of on -site waste compaction equipment. Planning for this equipment may require larger enclosure dimensions, defined overhead clearances, consideration of power utility access, and drainage management. Help with many design parameters related to service access is available via the City's contracted solid waste services provider, Waste Management. Contact: John Davis — Senior Route Manager at 206-786- 4530 (cell). COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - BUILDING DIVISION Peter Lawrence, 253-835-2621, peter.lawrenc_eQ.eityoffedera hvay.corn International Building Code (IBC), 2012 Washington State Amendments WAC 51-50 International Mechanical Code (IMC), 2012 Washington State Amendments WAC 51-52 Uniform PIUMbing Code (UPC), 2012 Washington State Amendments WAC 51-56 & WAC 51-57 International Fire Code (IFC), 2012 Washington State Amendments WAC 51 -54 National Electric Code (NEC), 2012 Accessibility Code, ICC/ANSI A117.1 — 2009 International Fire Code (IFC), 2012 Washington State Amendments WAC 51 -54 International Residential Code, 2012 Washington State Amendments WAC 51-51 Washington State Energy Code, 2012 WAC 5 1 -11 International Fuel and Gas Code, 2012 WAC 51-52 Building Criteria Occupancy Classification: A-3 Type of Construction: UNK 15-105662 Doc I.D. 71406 Mr. McDonald Page 12 December 1 1. 2015 Floor Area: 3000 MOD Pizza/ 2000 Starbucks Number of Stories: 1 Fire Protection: Alarm Wind/Seismic: Basic wind speed 85 Mph, Exposure, 25# Snow load, Seismic Zone D-1 A complete building permit application and commercial checklist. (Additional copies of application and checklists may be obtained on our web site at «�vw.cityoffederalway_.eom.) Submit _5_ sets of drawings and specifications. Specifications shall include: _2 Soils report, _2_ Structural calculations, and _2_ Energy calculations, _2_ Ventilation calculations. Note: A Washington State Registered architects' stamp is required for additions/alterations (new or existing) of 4,000 gross floor area or greater unless specifically listed as an "exempt" structure per the Revised Code of Washington (RCW). Energy code compliance worksheets are required to be completed and included with your permit application to include fenestration/ building envelope, mechanical compliance forms, lighting allowance forms, energy forms_ A wet stamp and signature is required on all sheets of plans and on the cover page of any calculations submitted. Federal Way reviews plans on a first in, first out basis; however, there are some small projects with inconsequential review requirements that may be reviewed out of order. Review Timing The first comment letter can be expected within 6 weeks of submittal date. Re -check of plans will occur in one to three weeks after re -submittal. Revised or resubmitted plans shall be provided in the same format, size, and amount as the originally submitted plans. Revised/resubmitted drawings shall indicate by means of clouding or written response, what changes have been made fi-orn the original drawings. Plans for all involved departments will be forwarded from the Community Development Department. Other Permits & Inspections Separate permits may be required for electrical, mechanical, plumbing, fire suppression systems, and signs. Applicants may apply for separate permits at any time prior to commencement of construction. When required, special inspections shall be performed by WABO approved agencies or by agencies approved by the building official prior to permit issuance. Construction must be approved by all reviewing departments prior to final building division inspection. All concerned departments (Planning, Public Works, Electrical, & Fire) must sign off before the Building Department can final the structure for occupancy. Building final must be approved prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 15-105662 Doc. I.D. 71406 Mr. McDonald Page 13 December 11. 2015 Construction projects may be required to have a pre -construction conference. If a pre -con meeting is required, the general or representative, all subs, the architect or representative, the engineer or representative, electrical contractor, and any other interested party, should attend this meeting. Meetings will occur at the Building Department and will be scheduled by the inspector of record for the project. Site -Specific Requirements 1. Separate electrical permits required. 2. King County Health Department is a separate agency. 3. IBC section 903.2.1.2, an automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group A-2 occupancies where one of the following conditions exists: The fire area has an occupant load of 100 or more. 4. It was clear from your proposed design submitted, but be aware of this code provision as it could add to your overall occupant load, which could trip the requirement of sprinklers. IBC section 1004.5 Outdoor areas. Yards, patios, courts and similar outdoor areas accessible to and usable by the building occupants shall be provided with means of egress as required by this chapter. The occupant load of such outdoor areas shall be assigned by the building official in accordance with the anticipated use. Where outdoor areas are to be used by persons in addition to the occupants of the building, and the path of egress travel from the outdoor areas passes through the building, means of egress requirements for the building shall be based on the sum of the occupant loads of the building plus the outdoor areas. 5. Pizza ovens do require a type I hood. The information provided is based on limited plans and information. The comments provided are not intended to be a complete plan review and further comments are possible at time of building permit plan review. LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT Brian Asbury, 253-946--5407 BAsburv@,Iakehaven.org Water ■ A Certificate of Water Availability (application form enclosed) issued separately by Lakehaven may be required to be submitted with any land use and/or building permit applications (check with land use agency for requirement). Certificate is valid for one (1) year from date of issuance. If Certificate is needed, allow 1-2 work days to issue for typical. The site has three (3) existing water service connections/meters. Parcel 0921049271: SvcNo 25460, 5/8"x3/4" domestic; and SvcNo 25702, 1" irrigation. Parcel 0921049296: SvcNo 4638, 1" domestic_ Preliminary Lakehaven presumption is that applicant will (at a minimum) 'reverse' the uses of the two (2) existing meters for parcel 0921049271, making the domestic the irrigation meter & vice - versa. A water service connection application (form enclosed) submitted separately to Lakehaven is required for each new service connection to the water distribution system, or any modification to an existing water service connection (e.g., larger service, abandonment of existing service, etc.), in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current 'Fees and Charges Resolution'. Non - single -family properties require separate domestic (per building), irrigation (if irrigated landscaped areas are incorporated into the site development), and fire protection (if required or installed) water service connections & meters. 15-105662 Doc. I.D. 71406 Mr. McDonald Page 14 December 11, 2015 Installation & satisfactory testing of an approved backflow prevention assembly (BPA) adjacent to each domestic & irrigation service meter is required pursuant to WAC 246-290-490 & Lakehaven standards regarding premise isolation. As low cross -connection hazards, either a double check valve assembly (DCVA) or a reduced pressure backflow assembly (RPBA) is required for each separate domestic &/or irrigation service connection. Contact Lakehaven's Cross -Connection Control Program Manager (Chris Zoepfl, CZoepfl@Lakehaven.org, 253-946-5427) for additional information on premise isolation & BPA testing coordination. Based on the proposal submitted, preliminary estimated Lakehaven water service connection fees/charges/deposits (2015 schedule) will be as follows. Actual connection charges will be determined upon submittal of service connection applications to Lakehaven. All Lakehaven fees, charges and deposits are typically reviewed & adjusted (if necessary) annually, and are subject to change without notice. o Capital Facilities Charge(s)-Water: $3,629.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU). Water system capacity credits are available for the site from system capacity charges previously assessed, paid directly to Lakehaven, and/or credited to the property for 2.52 ERU (0921049271=1.52, 0921049296=1.00). Non-residential water Capital Facilities Charges assessed are based on Applicant's estimated annual water usages. Please contact Lakehaven for further detail. o Water Service/Meter Installation (if existing upsize needed), 1'/2": $5,140.00 deposit. Actual size TBD by Lakehaven based on applicant's estimated maximum GPM usage rate. o ROW Pen -nit Fee (City of Federal Way, if existing upsize needed): $340.00. o Other (describe): $None anticipated. Sewer • A Certificate of Sewer Availability (application form enclosed) issued separately by Lakehaven may be required to be submitted with any land use and/or building permit applications (check with land use agency for requirement). Certificate is valid for one (1) year from date of issuance. If Certificate is needed, allow 1-2 work days to issue for typical. The site has an existing sewer service connection (SSCP 17812, copy enclosed). A separate Lakehaven sewer service connection permit (application form enclosed) is required for each new connection to the sanitary sewer system or any modification (re -align, abandon, install pretreatment device, etc.) to an existing sewer service connection, in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current `Fees and Charges Resolution'. Minimum pipe slope for gravity sewer service connections is 2%. In addition to all other sewer service installation standards, installation of a Type 1, 48" monitoring manhole is typically required on the private building sewer line, for all new or modified non-residential connections. Also, installation of an externally -located grease interceptor is required for all new restaurants & food service establishments, size to be determined by applicant's engineer. Based on the proposal submitted, preliminary estimated Lakehaven sewer service connection fees/charges/deposits (2015 schedule) will be as follows. Actual connection charges will be determined upon submittal of service connection application(s) to Lakehaven. All Lakehaven fees, charges and deposits are typically reviewed & adjusted (if necessary) annually, and are subject to change without notice. o Sewer Service Connection Permit Fee: $360.00. 15-10566= Doc. 1 D. 71406 Mr. McDonald Page 15 December 11, 2015 o Capital Facilities Charge(s)-Sewer: $3,206.00 per ERU. Sewer system capacity credits are available for tax parcel 0921049271 from system capacity charges previously assessed, paid directly to Lakehaven, and/or credited to the property for 3.64 ERU (0921049271=1.52, 0921049296=2.12). Non -residential sewer Capital Facilities Charges assessed are based on Applicant's estimated annual domestic water usages. Please contact Lakehaven for further detail. o FWCC Earlycomer Charge(s): $2,233.00 per ERU. Charge(s) applicable only for those estimated Sewer ERU above existing credit level(s). Please contact Lakehaven for further detail. o Other (describe): $None anticipated. General • Utility conflicts should be identified and coordination (if necessary) should occur as early as possible in the planning process. Project will need to avoid encroachment with existing Lakehaven sewer facilities and easement(s). • All comments herein are valid for one (1) year and are based on the proposal(s) submitted and Lakehaven's current regulations and policies. Any change to either the development proposal(s) or Lakehaven's regulations and policies may affect the above comments accordingly. • Lakehaven Utility District neither warrants nor guarantees the accuracy of any facility information shown. Facility locations and conditions are subject to field verification. .. A11 fees and charges are subject to change without notice. SOUTH KING FIRE AND RESCUE Vince Faranda, 253-946-7242, vince.l'aranda ,southkingfire orb The required fire flow for this project is 1750 gallons per minute. A Certificate of Water Availability shall be provided indicating the fire flow available at the site. A hydraulic fire flow model shall be requested from the water district. • One fire hydrant shall be required. Existing fire hydrants on public streets are available for this project. • Designated fire lanes may be required for emergency access. This may be done during the plans check or after the facility is in operation. Fire apparatus access roads shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction. • An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group A-2 occupancies where the fire area has an occupant load of 100 or more. Fire walls shall not be considered to separate a building to enable deletion of the required automatic fire - extinguishing system. I5-105662 Doc, I.D, 71406 Mr. McDonald Page 16 December 11, 2015 A Fire Alarm System is required. An automatic fire detection system shall be installed in all buildings exceeding 3,000 square feet gross floor area. This fire detection system shall be monitored by a central and/or remote station conforming to the current requirements of the National Fire Protection Association standards and/or the fire chief or designee. *A separate permit is required for the fire suppression system of a type 1 hood. CLOSING This letter reflects the information provided at the preapplication meeting and is intended to assist you in preparing plans and materials for formal application. We hope you found the comments useful to your project. We have made every effort to identify major issues to eliminate surprises during the City's review of the formal application. The completion of the preapplication process in the content of this letter does not vest any future project application. Comments in this letter are only valid for one year as per FWRC 19.40.070 (4). As you know, this is a preliminary review only and does not take the place of the full review that will follow submission of a formal application. Comments provided in this letter are based on preapplication materials submitted. Modifications and revisions to the project as presented for this preapplication may influence and modify information regarding development requirements outlined above. In addition to this preapplication letter, please examine the complete FWRC and other relevant codes carefiilly. Requirements that are found in the codes that are not addressed in this letter are still required for your project. If you have questions about an individual comment, please contact the appropriate department representative noted above. Any general questions can be directed towards the key project contact, Becky Chapin, 253-835-2641. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, 4vP� Becky apin Associate Planner enc: Master Land Use Application Process 11 Submittal Requirements CPTED Checklist Lakehaven Handouts c: Joe Donahou; DDG Architects, LLC, 8383 1581h Ave NE; Suite 380, Redmond, WA 98052 Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Peter Lawrence. Plans Examiner Vince Faranda, South King Fire & Rescue Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District 15-105662 Doc I D 71406 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC) Preapplication Conference Sign In Sheet NWCC Center Plaza 15-105562-00-PC December 3, 2015 NAME WITH PHONE w�v. r-�+rsa,�- �•�. Dw. vtC-p.SS 253•gss-2�3 \�)e-J SAX v 53- 8--S5-- Z?30 6 3J. =z63 r I L - !;q/ -Z3 �tx- 1-5;A-Alc CoH /F-^� C l� p 2 s 3 P3!�' 06V3 1 37 NAME WITH PHONE :�'4 12/3/2015 ags69402c 39Ob6.Pcg (800X600) Ar • �ft Vo& http:llgismaps,kingcounty.govlarcgislrestldirectcrieslarcgisouqxitlPrinlinglPrin[ing5ervice GPServerl ags 69402c805693449e,94f36d4d89c3_9ob6.png ill King County .t k7r Mn r% ` jo �y� f The hformation induded on this map has been compled by IGng County stafffrom a variety of sources and is subject to change vAthoutnotice. King County makes no representations orwaranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, tkneiness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended for use as a survey product long County shall not be table Tor any general, special, indirect, incidental, orconseruential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or bst pmfits resulting from the use or misuse ofthe information contained on this map. Any sale of this map orinformation on this map is prohibited except bywritten permission of King County. Date: 12/3/2015 11J CCf i ;'„ LgKinqCounty November 06, 2015 City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave South Federal Way, Washington 98003 PROJECT. • Center Plaza- Building G Federal Way, Washington RE: Project Narrative RECETVE® NOV 0 6 2015 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CD5 Donahou Design Group The proposed development is to reuse and expand the existing bank building and canopy. The current bank is 497 SF. The proposed development would expand the area to 3,000 SF for a new restaurant. The existing canopy structure will be incorporate into the design of the expansion. An exterior plaza on the south side of the building will be created and will have a pedestrian connection to 2 1 " Ave. S. Proposed building materials are stucco, horizontal wood/ steel canopies, vertical metal siding and an anodized aluminum storefront system. These materials are consistent with surrounding buildings and will enhance the existing shopping center character. Exterior lighting will be mounted on the underside of the canopies casting light down towards the adjacent sidewalk and plaza area. Roof top HVAC units are proposed to be located at the midpoint of the roof. Parapet heights range from 4 feet to 7 feet, therefore providing adequate screening. Also proposed is a new pedestrian connection providing a link north to the existing retail buildings. A phase II addition is planned that would expand the existing Starbucks building from 1,145 SF to 2,000 SF. Minor site improvements are associated with this expansion (revised drive thru and additional outdoor plaza) and will be part of the Phase I development. Two new trash enclosures will also be incorporated into the site plan. There will be a net increase in parking of eight stalls as a result of these modifications. Overall parking required based on use for the center is 377 stalls. There will 463 stalls provided as a result of this development. It is our opinion that the proposed modification will not affect the overall project character and does not intensif4the use of the center. Jose4i P Donahou AIA Principal 8383 158th Ave NE Suite 380 Redmond, WA 98052 Tel: (425) 285-9992 - M-7�0 November 10, 2015 Mark McDonald NWCC Center Plaza, LLC 1402-East Pike Street Seattle, WA 98122 markfcc nvcc. as_com _- =th�ry �4s , Jim Ferrell, Mayor RE: File #15-105662-00-PC; PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED NWCC Center Plaza — M.O.D. Pizza, 2104 South 3201h Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. McDonald: The Community Development Department is in receipt of your preapplication conference request. The application has been routed to members of the Development Review Committee and a meeting with the project applicant has been scheduled as follows: 9:00 a.m. — Thursday, December 3, 2015 Hylebos Conference Room Federal Way City Hall, 2" d Floor 33325 8d' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 We look forward to meeting with you. Please coordinate directly with anyone else you would like to attend the meeting as this will be the only notice sent by the department. If you have any questions regarding the meeting, please contact me at becky.chapin@cityoffederalway.com, or 253-835-2641. Sincerely, Becky Cha in Associate Planner Doc I.D 71398 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: faTlTI141VIA FOR DRC MTG. ON: FILE NUMBER(s): RELATED FILE NOS.: PROJECT NAME: - ; O) U A Nrrr��Axx ZONING DISTRICT. November 10, 2015 E.J. Walsh, Development Services Manager Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Qff is firgham, South King Fire & Rescue Becky Chapin, Associate Planner November 19, 2015 —Internal December 3, 2015, 9:00am — with applicant 15-105662-00-PC None NWCC Center Plaza, LLC (M.O.D. Pizza) 2104 S 320TH ST CC-C PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to expand existing Key Bank drive-thru building by 1000 square foot to create a sit down restaurant. LAND USE PERMITS. ' � /�1J�Z�fl1[K/L`U1�IIJY�S MATERIALS SUBMITTED: **It looks like they are propsing to modify/expand the Starbucks site as well. ** Preapplication Conference Mark McDonald NWCC Center Plaza, LLC 1402 Pike St Seattle, WA 98122 • Master Land Use Application • Project Narrative • Preliminary Site Plan ■ Perspective Drawing R� MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES oil�Qv 33325 8`h Avenue South CITY OF Rp� �Np` Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal Way r-� of �c05 253-835- w.cit Fax dcmlw5 2609 .cone �v�vw.cityoffederal viay.cam APPLICATION NO(S) N C42 CC, E ��� ���� Date ProjectName Property Address/Location Parcel Number(i) 0 �d- f L 01 2' 4/ -- Project Description PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination _I/- Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information Zoning Designation (� CC ( fd/�Comprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Y55 0i4 ' Occupancy Type Construction Type Applicant Name: N W C C_ C r--l-JTZ�. !t_ Q Az ✓4 t L. L(1- Address: ! Ll d'L C p I t<-,�- —7, } _ err3rTj C GJ'�it Z City/State: r; vc.� 7 -L_i &�_,A Zip: q wI-Z'Z Phone: a o(, — 2c] I - Z 3 Y 5-- Fax: Email: }/VICL r I�[� /-J l�vc e- U S Sigliatur Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: A3 Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: 'ul letin #003 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application �� • r-I m CEO •� W N M o d' N ,i Go • 260258#-, 1-0 o ar' 5.97 AC w _ 9297 o - k Ln m .� N84-23-36w � o LC)1 — 425•05 - PRIVATE ROAD 3 0 L 164 . 00 092104 — TR. X TRCT — — 'n I --I - - _ _ ON 092104 0 �35 61 g��' UND �� 61- 61IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIll 1 — r ff' — � 9020 p ' IN `S%'J'Lj 0 3 6 14.31 : 00 r-I u� LOT 1 LOT j n� 2 W 092104 9271 0. 4 A I w N 092104 CD m092104 ccN ch LOT 3 _ O 61 I 9270 Q 9296 rl 0 r 1 0 (M i c7 I O,i of • N`pp i = 1 ¢�3 z z z 20465#a <il.., 5q' 39656 SF 9271 4 32. 3 9270 5 16624 SF - N 88-16-31 W 9� 5 .°)9' 9296 N88 6-31W 19 ���,� ! - - 173.:7 63.83 62.11 N rn 3Q.69 .� ;� %� -------------- - 0 105. 17 ��' rrh' I 4 I 0 m ...�•er�r•.��4......� — — 6 . 10 � o N 88-16-31 W 4$ o o- Lo H + �� cn "`; 1 `P4 o o . 92 � C01. 91���- _ 7-2-32 (S.R.5) (P.S.H. NO. 1) f r�4 �� S 88-16-31 E PIERCE CO. LINE--TO-JCT.- 81( S.S.H. N4 SHEETS 1 & 2 OF 6 APPROVED 10-28-1958 SHEET 8 & 10 OF 20 i I REV. 9-26-77 FOR RELIN Use High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant Period Weekday Evening Street Peak 1 Code 832 Parameter Pross Leasable Area Quantity 3.000 Studies 6 Outliers 0 Lower Data Range 1.500 tipper Data Range 13.500 %Entering 59 Rate 11.15 Std Dev 9.13 Equation Type Coefficient A Constant C R'2 Data Close to Rate? Data Close to Equation? Closest Data Point RATE Trips by Rate 33.45 O.OQ 0.00 0,00 Trips by Equation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Within Data Range? YES NO NO NO N>2? YES NO NO NO >19? NO NO NO NO Outliers<5%? NA NA NA NA y-intercept NA NA NA NA Near 0? NA NA NA NA Std Dev/Rate>1.10? NO NA NA NA R"2>0.75? NO NO NO NO RECOMMENDATION STUDY STUDY STUDY STUDY Trips 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weight by Rate 1.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weight by Equation 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.00 RESULTS RATE EQUATION AVERAGE Weighted Average 33.4:5 33.45 Entering Trips 19,74 0.00 19.74 Exiting Trips 13,71 0.00 13.71 Pass -By% 43.001ff 43.00o 43.00o Total New Trips 19.07 0.00 19.07 lEntering New Trips 11.25 0.00 11.25 Exiting New Tri s 7.82 0.001 7.82 Enter comments Enter Land Use Enter Time Period Enter ITE Land Use Code Enter Independent Variable Enter Quantity of Independent Variable Enter Number of Studies Enter Number of Outlying Data Points Enter the Lowest Data Point Enter the Highest Data Point Enter the Percentage of Trips Entering the Site Enter the Rate Enter the Standard Deviation of the Rate Enter Logarithmic, Linear, Inverse, Semi -logarithmic, or Exponential. Enter the coefficient of the variable of the equation. Enter the constant of the equation Enter the coefficient of variation. Enter Yes or No Enter Yes or No Enter Rate or Equation Enter Pass -By Rate CITY CENTER (CC) CITY OF Estimate of Development Traffic Impact Fees Federal Way This spreadsheet is for development in City Center (CC) only. Scroll down and complete the steps outlined below: Please fill in the required information in the yellow highlighted boxes. STEP #1: General Information Enter lntormatlon Project Name File Number Street Address City, State Zip Parcel Number (s) MOD Pizza 15-105662-PC Federal Way, WA STEP #2: Land Use Type (CC) Select the proposed Land Use Type(s) from the dropdown memu below. Enter the proposed number of units for Proposed Land Use Type (s) 1) High Turnover Restaurant (CC) 2) NONE 3) INONE 4) NONE Unit of Number of Impact Fee Rate per Preliminary Impact Measure Unit(s) Unit of Measure Fee Amount sf/GFA $ 9.49 $ 28,455.00 *N/A $ $ #N/A $ $ #N/A i� $ $ $ 28,455.00 STEP #3 - Credit/Change in Use (CC) This step applies to development proposal to change existing building or dwelling use. Provide any impact fee previouly paid for the land use category of the prior use IMPACT FEE AMOUNT PAID FOR (Do not include administration fees). PRIOR USE For a change in use of an existing building, the impact fee will be assessed based on the difference between the new uses and the prior use. If no impact fee was required for the prior use, the impact fee for the new use shall be reduced by the amount equal to the current impact fee rate in affect for the prior use. Fill out the lines below of the prior use. Proposed Land Use Type (s) 1) Drive-in Bank (CC) 2) NONE 3) NONE Unit of Number of Impact Fee Rate per Preliminary Impact Measure Unit(s) Unit of Measure Fee Amount sf/GFA 500 $ 14.32 $ 7,161.00 *N/A $ $ - *N/A $ $ $ 7,161.00 STEP #6: Total Impact Fee (CC) Calculate estimated Total Traffic Impact Fee payment amount, including Administrative Fees. Traffic Impact Fee (Before adjustment) $ 28,455.00 Credit/Adjustment Including Change of Use $ 7,161.00 Administrative Fee (3%) $ 638.82 ESTIMATE TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PAYMENT $ 21.932.82 Timina of Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Payment For residential land divisions, fees shall be calculated and paid at the time of plat recording. For un-platted single- family residential lots, commercial and multi -family developments, fees shall be calculated based on the impact fee schedule in effect at the time a completed building permit application is filed and paid prior to permit issuance. For residential land divisions and un-platted single-family residential lots, the transportation impact fee may be deferred, but shall be paid no later than the closing of sale of each individual house. Covenants prepared by the city to enforce payment of the deferred fees shall be recorded at the applicant's expense on each lot at the time of plat recording for residential land divisions and prior to building permit issuance for un-platted single- family residential lots. The fee shall be calculated based on the impact fee schedule in effect on the date of payment of the impact fee. 1�kCITY OF -, Federal Way FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS CHECKLIST The following checklist is intended to be used to assist Public Works Traffic Division in determining streets frontage improvements requirement in meeting FWRC 19.135 and Nexus. I. Background 1. Project Name: NWCC Center Plaza LLC 2. DRC meeting Date: Dec. 3, 2015 N 4 Project Location: 2104 S 320' St. File Number: 15-105662-PC Project Description: Expand existing Key Bank Drive-thru by 2,500 sf into a restaurant 5. Identify adjacent development zoning within'/z mile of the proposed site (check all if applicable): ® Commercial/Retail ❑ Schools/Parks ❑ Multi/Single Family II. Frontage Improvements Per FWRC 19.135 1. Please check whether this is a new, redevelopment or expansion project. ❑ New ® Redevelopment ❑ Expansion If this is a redevelopment or expansion project, please verify in meeting the 25 percent threshold per FWRC 19.135.030 (a). ❑ Less than 25% ® Exceeds 25% ❑ N/A 2. Identify streets frontage improvements per FWRC 19.135.040 (provide X-section and ROW dedication). All frontage improvements including ROW dedication should be measured from street centerline. Street Cross ROW ROW Streets Frontage Section Dedication Dedication (Feet) (Sq. Ft.) A. S 320' St B 0 0 B. 21st Ave S Q 5 475 C. Total requested ROW dedication (sq. ft.) 475 Total ROW Dedication per code (300 Sq. ft. per daily trip) 30,600 SF III. Traffic Generation and Distribution 1. Identify Land Use Code and Trips for existing and future project during Critical Hours (hours of largest impact) for analysis based on the Latest Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. Existing Building Land Use Code: Drive -In Bank Description: Vacant building —NO TRIP Proposed Project Land Use: ITE LU 932 - Restaurant Description: 1. Existing Trips 2. Proposed Project Peak Period (Credit) Trips Net New Trips = (2-1) A.M. Peak 35 35 Facility Peak 55 55 P.M. Peak 19 19 ADT- 381 381 Saturday Peak 42 42 Saturday Daily 475 475 Sunday Peak Sunday Daily **If ADT is not available, for estimate use PM peak multiply by 10. 2. Identify pedestrian activities and provide data source if available. If not available, estimate pedestrian trip generated by proposed development. How many pedestrian is expected to be generated by the proposed project? ❑ None ® 1 or More Please check expected pedestrian type. ❑ School ❑ Elderly ® General Data source: Located in CC 3. Trip Distribution. Utilizing existing land use and traffic condition to estimate trip distribution and identify road(s) that new trips will be using. Provide location of new facilities and existing facilities impacted by increased traffic. Identify site access points, functional classification, and ADT of streets fronting the proposed development. Streets Frontage Classification Access ADT Est. New PM J Points Trips A. S 320' St Arterial 1 35,000+ 19 B. 21 Ave S llor 1 1,000- 13 C ector 5,000 C. D. * If no direct access and/or significant project's trips on street frontage, improvement or ROW dedication may not be warranted Additional information: S 320 Stand 21 Ave S are fullv constructed with wide sidewalk IV. Street Frontage Improvements - Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - FWRC 19.135.030 (f). 1. Is there any street frontage impacted by TIP/CIP? ® Yes ❑ No (See CIP and latest adopted TIP) If yes, please identify TIP/CIP project and cost: Add sidewalk on west side of 21 Ave S. Curb Line along frontage may not change pending final approval. a. If the development proposal has frontage on a project listed in the City's Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) and that project is deemed fully funded, the ARRlicant shall dedicate right--of-way consistent with adopted Comprehensive PIan and any additional planned turn lanes. b. If the development proposal has frontage on a project listed in the City's TIP and that project is not fully funded, the Applicant shall pay a pro-rata share of the TIP project of the City's estimated construction cost for street frontage improvements in accordance with the following formula. In addition, the Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way consistent with adopted Comprehensive Plan and any additional planned turn lanes. Pro-rata _ development site frontage X (TIP Project Cost — Value of Dedicated share (linear feet) Right -of -Way) total project frontage (linear feet) C. If the development proposal does not have frontage on a project listed on the City's Six -year TIP, the Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way consistent with adopted Comprehensive Plan and any additional turn lanes and construct these street frontage improvements. V. Safety and Non -motorized Facilities 1. Check Transit Service and Pedestrian Facilities - Numbers of bus stopping and pedestrian activities around the project. ® Adequate width of sidewalk (suggest min. of 5 feet) ® Sidewalks connect to Schools/Parks ® At ultimate grade ® Pedestrian facility connections to other development and bus stop Location of bus shelters or drop-off areas: Walking distance to Transit Center 2. Collision Data during latest 3 calendar years along streets frontage route. A. ❑ None LOU © None C. ❑ 1 to 3 �C] 21 Ave S ❑ 1 to 3 ❑ ❑ None ❑ 1 to 3 ❑ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3. Verify Level of Service (LOS) and queues at immediate impacted intersections next to street frontage. ■ S 320th St. & 21 Ave S: Access limited to EBL and right-in/out only. No LOS issue 4. Identify Turning radii and sight distance at proposed accesses. VI. Recommendation/Conclusion 1. Are street(s) frontage Improvements Warranted based on the analysis? ❑ Yes ®No If warranted, please identify which frontages meets warrant and whether the applicant will be required to build the improvements or contribute pro-rata. Streets Frontage Build (Yes/No) Comments A. S 320, St No Fully constructed to current standard B. 21 Ave S No Dedicate ROW to accommodate sidewalk extension pending design. C. D. Additional comments on this project: Existing building has been vacant for extend period and trips not included in 2014 traffic count for CN. Additional row would be needed with chance in curb line final L:\DEPT\PW\TRA\Frontage Checklist\NWCC Center Plaza 15-105662-PC.doc EXISTIN BUILDIN (RED LOB`. SOUTH 320TH STREET