Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
16-101380
CITY OF t Federal Way April 29, 2016 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Mi Tran Email mitran rt 9mail,com 13008 SE 305"h Court Auburn, WA 98092 Re: File #16-101380-00-AD; WETLAND CONSULTANT PEER REVIEW ESTIMATE Pierson/Na/Tran, 30XXX S 337`h St., Parcel Nos. 442060-0025, 442060-0030 & 442060-0035 Dear Ms. Tran: Please find the enclosed peer review for the `Wetland Determination for North Lake Properties' prepared by C. Gary Schulz, Wetland/Forest Ecologist, October 25, 2414. The Department's consultant, ESA Associates, has determined a full delineation of the northern portion of the three above-inentioned properties is required. No efforts to delineate the wetland boundaries of any identified wetlands were made by the peer reviewer. The following recommendations must be satisfied prior to site development. Based upon a field investigation and other documentation provided, ESA recommends the following: ■ The lake -fringe wetland in the northern portion of the three subject parcels should be delineated following methods required by the FWRC pursuant to the Corps 1987 Manual and regional supplement. Data plots should be established within and outside of the wetland to document the delineation; and, a The wetland should be rated based on the methods required by the FWRC and a standard buffer should be applied and shown on a site plan. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please contact me at 253-835-2644, or lei la.wil[OL[ghby-oakes@cltyoffederalway.com. Sincerely Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner C. Wayne Potter. NovaStar Development. nMotierf lnnpy85tardey.Ctlm enc. ESA Peer Review Report, April 21. 2016 (Wetland Determination Review: Na, Pierson & Tran Properties. federal Way) Bulletin 078 Optional Direct Services Application Doc LD. 73314 I6-101350-00-AD (COO [p"' CITY OF � If Federal Way WETLANDS CONSULTANT PEER REVIEW Date: March 23, 2016 Consultant: Ilon Logan 5309 Shilshole Ave. NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206-789-9658 Email: iloizan _fesassoc.com Project: Tran Wetland Peer Review (Lot 7) Parcels # 442060-0035 File: 16-101380-AD (Related Peer Reviews: 16-100805-AD & 16-101020-AD) Project Proponents: Mi Tran 13008 SE 305"' Court Federal Way, WA 98092 Email: Mitranl63 ail.com Project Planner: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Associate Planner 33325 8 h Ave S., Federal Way, WA 98003 253.835.2644 Email: Leila.Willou hb -Oakes cit offederalwa .com Project Scope: The applicant proposes to construct a future single-family home at the above - mentioned property (unaddressed and undeveloped). The City's Critical Areas inventory depicts a fringe wetland on the parcelalong North Lake. During a 2015 preapplication, the former owner submitted a Wetland Determination for undeveloped parcels within the plat of Louise North Lake Tracts in Federal Way (442060-0010, 442060-0025 & 442060-0030). This peer review request is limited to a review of Parcel # 442060-0035 for the presence of wetlands. Parcel 4.42060-0035 was unmerged with abutting parcels for building purposes. Applicants Na and Pierson (Lots 5 and 6) initially entered into the peer review request jointly. Planning staff were contacted later by the owner/prospective owner of Lot 7 442060-0035 to be included in the peer review of the existing Wetland Determination. Peer review fees for all subject properties will be $4,000.00, split evenly among Na, Pierson and Tran. This is a separate Task Authorization for the Tran Peer Review request. File No: 16-101380-AD Doc. I.D. 72799 Task Scope: 1. A third party review of Wetland Determination_ for North Lake Properties (dated October 25, 2014) for Parcel 442060-0035 and associated materials for consistency with Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 15.10 `Critical Areas'; especially Article VI `Regulated Wetlands," FWRC 15.10.240-15.10.270 requirements. The proposal is located within the residential shoreline designation, therefore critical area regulations within FWRC Title 15- `Shoreline Management' apply (versus FWRC 19.145). 2. Perform site visits confirming conditions; and, 3. Prepare a brief memo of findings, in particular describing results of the site visit and letter review and confirming the presence or absence of wetlands on the subject property and determining the associated buffer. Documents Provided: Peer Review Application (Lot 7- 442060-0035) 2014 Wetland Determination for North Lake Properties (C. Gary Schulz) City Critical Area Mapping Task Cost: Not to exceed $1333.33 without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. I Acceptance: City of Federal Way (Planner, Leila Willoughby -Oakes) Consultant (Ilon Logan, Senior ologist, ESA Associates) Project Proponent (Louise North Lake Tracts Lot 7) (Mi Tran) ;� c/% Date Date Date ' An additional $500.00 was added to February 26, 2016's contract for $3,500.00 between Na and Pierson to review Lot 7 per Ilon Logan, ESA Associates). File No: 16-101380-AD Doc. I.D. 72799 FILE CITY OF Federal Way March 24, 2016 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. corn Jim Ferrell, Mayor Ilon Logan, Senior Ecologist Emailed: ilogan esassoc.com Environmental Science Associates 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 RE: File#16-101020-AD/16-100805-AD/16-101380-AD; REQUEST FOR WETLAND REPORT PEER REVIEW Na, Pierson and Tran — *No Site Address' (Parcels 442060-0025, 442060-0030 & 442060-0035) Dear Ms. Logan: Please find the enclosed task authorization forms for the above -mentioned tax parcels and project file numbers. Per our email discussions, a revised Task Authorization form enclosed (originally sent February 18, 2016) adds one tax parcel (442060-0030) to the scope of work. A separate Task Authorization form for tax parcel 442060 0035 is also enclosed for the Tran Wetland Peer Review (16-101380-AD). The City proposes to combine three requested peer reviews of the same wetland report prepared by C. Gary Schulz, Wetland/Forest Ecologist October 25, 2014. ESA has quoted a cost of $4,000.00 to review all parcels. Please review the scope of work contained in the task authorization forms, review the task costs on page 2 of each document as provided by your firm, and return to the city by email and the signed original by mail. Following the deposit of finds by the applicant, staff will provide authorization to proceed with the scope of work. For the purposes of expediting review timelines the City requests the proposed tasks be completed within 10 business days of receiving notice to proceed from the City. Please contact me at 253-835-2644 or lei la.willouahbv-oakes �t.cit xoffederalway.com if you have any questions regarding this task or the proposed scope. Sincecok:::5� rely. n Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner ene: Original Signed Task Authorization (Na Peer Review & Pierson Peer Review -Lots 5 and 6) Blank Task Authorization (Tran Peer Review -Lot 7) I6-101020-.AD Doc I, D. 72789 CITY OF Federal Way Date: July 6, 2018 To: Erik Earle, IT GIS Analyst From: Robert `Doc' Hansen, Planning Manager MEMORANDUM Community Development Department Subject: Louise's North Lake Tracts Wetland Determination & Ordinary Highwater Mark (Parcels: 442060-0025, 442060-0030 & 442060-0035) The purpose of this memo is to follow-up on a requested update to the GIS wetland base map (atlas page #85 & #88), sent on February 10, 2016 to depict a Category II (reviewed under the old critical areas code) wetland requiring, a 100-foot buffer landward from the wetland edge (FWRC 15.10.250.b) coincident with the OHWM (on parcels 442060-0025, 442060-0030 & 442060-0035). The Department hereby approves the attached wetland map survey prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, date stamped as received December 23, 2016. APPROVED 7,1L_� ri r wit4�� Robert `Doc' Hansen, Planning Manager E �1 IY_ 9f" CHIMNEY r • - - - NIGHETST RQOF 11 ELEVATION SCALE 1/4"=I'-O" L CAULK ALL JONTI IN JECT TO AIR A-dl WATER FILTRATION SUCH AS AROUND DOORS. WINDOWS, and BEAMS PROTRUDING THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS OF BUILDING i. EXTERICR SIDING SHALL BE IxS BEVEL RESA N FACE TIGHT KNOT CMAR AND OR 9H�klI/4• FIBER CEMENT HORIZONTAL LAP. FACE NAIL PER EXTERIOR WALL DETAILS, 3 ROOFING 15 ASPHALT SHINGLES, 4 WINDOWS ARE MILGA D MONTECITO SERIES VINYL FRAME (TAN COLOR) WITH LOW-E / AF3GON GLAZING. S. SWINGING EXTERIOR DOORS IN EXPOSED LO..J.TIf�. 51.7A7 REOUIRE TFE ADDITION OF CUSTOMER SUPPLIED STORM DOORS TO A5515T WITH PREVENTING AIR AND WATER INFILTRATION b. GRADE MUST SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING. 1. WHEN PLANS ARE ON II" x 11" SHEET5, REDUCE SCALE BY HALF FOR PROPER DIMENSION SEE PAGES 'LI' dYru 15' FOR SHEAR WALL REQUIREMENTS II I I WALL AT TOP OF CONCRETE AT LEV�.FOUNDATION J j \ }I • — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — j — f�REET $EE TALNBVERSE SECTION) ' ' 1\ i° - 1 -------------- ---------- ----- -------- --------- ------ -- — — — — — — iy1L1 --------------.._.__.. • e Imo— DOWV SPOUT (II PLACES! ^ � . ` 1 !n •`'` ...--- 404' AT YOp CF CLHCRETE - - - EJ<IStIN6 GRADE • ' ' - • - • FP�U9H O'�9 E 1 .. WALL AT GARAGE FOU IPATKN (SVZT ET LEVEL- 5EE T-w5VEiLa'•E SECTION) 4p WALL .... . ... . . ... . ...... 5' AT TOP ❑F CLHG'R£TE AT --LSE EaPmAT!R•I - - .. _.--_-.. ••.••_._•••. ••_. _•• ••... 7 WEST I NORTH SIDE EXTERIOR SIDING SHALL BE ....--- _ I ' - - ' - - - Z J 1 i$TREET SEE LEVEL- TANSVERSE SECTION} I"xB" BEVEL RESAU N FACE TIGHT KNOT CEDAR 40m5' AT CORNER -J LOWEST GRADE) EXISTAY GRADE ; EAST SIDE ELEVATION EAST I SOUTH SIDE EXTERIOR SIDING SHALL BE 5/1a"x8I14" FIBER CEMENT HORIZONTAL LAP. 'I S c _ ~ . i SCALE I/4"=I'-0" �_ 4 j vi 6 6 = 0 NOK[H b[LJ� tLtVA11UN SCALE 1/4"=I'-O" 1•�1 f I r ,F • � i F _ t.n 404.5' AT TOP OF CONCRETE WA" AT HOUSE FOUNDATION [STREET - SEE TFN5vER;VER$E SECTION) E 4 a T a ]O 5C ALE Vr<' I'•6' rp, Nis C% II X IT AGt uALF SCALE, VOUNGVR NR 2536611229 PARCEL NO. 442060002 DATE; REVISION; BY; 5111117 AMENOMENT YN 7/9/17 PU AFTER APPROVAL YOUNG #3$ AMEND ENTRY WAY %3S #45 •4$ %4$ #55 s5 %5$ #6a •5: %eS #7$ •7$ %7$ #Es •85 %es #9$ 5S %9$ 9. #10S •10f %10E %` #11$ •11S s `. %11 S #12S i2S %12E A L 39Vd SZL% SZL. Sm Su% SLL. sun SOL% SOL. SoW $B% SB Sa SS% to. $" SA CL, SM SS% Ss. SSn SS% SS. SSn St% Sb. sw Se% AVM AH.LN30NMV Sw Mnak tlA0HddVllNH3d HaUV Ltd LLIBIL NA LN3WON3Ntl LULL/9 'A9 'NOISIA3H '31VO 5Z0009ozvti 'ON 13MVd 6ZZ6 699 R dN 1OAONAOA 0 • r3 r •lPM _LIY LI % It W7 1;, d ) OZ 91 A V 4 G s .0-.I=.4/I 31VO5 NO11VA3-13 341S N1f10S un �3Jw I MVNI nI 2NV&Ha^- �OW bl dG2115 9157 �uNaSddWlS T T T SlN3WaNln73N TIM Nv'3FiS No=l ,5"1. ^Lil .I-1, S3Wcl 339 „0-1=.4/1 3lV'�9 N011VAD-l3 3419 1SEIM 40" ac" S USIX3_ Memorandum To: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, City of Federal Way From: Paul S. Anderson, Ecology NWRO Wetlands/401 Unit Supervisor Cc: David Pater, Ecology Date: 10/10/2016 Re: Wetland Determination at North Lake Background I understand that questions have been raised about the extent and category of wetlands along southern shore and within North Lake in the City of Federal Way (City). As the acting Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) Wetland Specialist for King County jurisdictions, I am happy to assist the City in answering wetland- and shoreline -related questions. Ecology is the state agency responsible for regulating wetlands and shorelines and, as such, has developed a number of guidance documents for protecting these valuable resources. To ensure that regulatory interpretations are consistent with that guidance and state law, Ecology staff routinely provide technical assistance to other agencies and local governments. At North Lake, the central question is whether wetlands below the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the lake should be regulated as wetlands or are they considered to be part of the lake itself and not subject to wetland regulation? Answering that question has important implications for future land use on several undeveloped parcels along the lake shore because it will determine the required buffers and regulatory setbacks. Regulatory Context In addition to other waters, water bodies greater than or equal to 20 acres in size are subject to regulation under the state Shoreline Management Act (SMA; RCW 90.58) and the City's Shoreline Master Program (SMP; Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Ch. 15.05). At approximately 56 acres in size, North Lake is a shoreline of the state regulated through the SMA and the City's SMP. Wetlands and other critical areas within shoreline jurisdiction are regulated by the City through the standards in SMP Appendix A. Wetlands are characterized by a dominance of plants adapted for life in saturated soils and by inundation or saturation (see RCW 90.58.030(2)(h)). Wetlands are frequently associated with water bodies or streams and maybe found below the OHWM of those waters (Hruby 2014). Far wetland delineation purposes, only five percent cover is required to consider an area vegetated (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2010). Page 2 of 9 October 10, 2016 The shorelands (landward 200 feet of the OHWM and any associated wetlands') at North Lake are apparently designated Urban Conservancy in the SMP and require a minimum 50-foot setback from the OHWM (FWRC § 1'5.05.070(6) Standards table). Wetlands under 2,500 square feet (sf) are exempt from regulation under the SMP; whereas, Category I wetlands require a 200-foot buffer, Category II wetlands require a 100-foot buffer, Category III wetlands greater than 10,000 sf have a 50- foot buffer and Category III wetland between 2,500 and 10,000 sf have a 25-foot buffer (SMP Appendix A § 6.13). Additional regulatory guidance on wetlands, including lake fringe wetlands below OHWM, is found in the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington, 2014 Update (Hruby 2014). Of particular relevance to the wetlands waterward of the OHWM at North Lake is the following guidance from § 4.4 (p. 23): "Sometimes a strip of open water is found between the wetland plants farther from shore and those closer to shore. In this situation, the open water is considered a part of one unit that encompasses both the rooted submerged plants offshore and the shore -side plants. The absence of plants in the area of open water may only be temporary, or the submerged plants are present but not visible because they do not grow to the surface. The plants may also be absent due to wave action or physical removal." Office Assessment A number of resources were reviewed in considering whether the lake fringe wetlands at North Lake should be regulated as wetlands, including the City's SMP, Ecology's current wetland rating system (Hruby 2014), Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) 2013), aerial photographs, the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI; available at: https:llwww.fw"ovlwetiands/Data/Mapper.html) and a boundary and topographic survey (Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated 9-23-14) for parcels along the southern shore of the lake. The survey shows three adjoining parcels, identified on the survey as Lots 5, 6 and 7 and Lot 2 to the east. The survey also shows the flagged OHWM on all of the subject parcels as well as 5 flags (labelled W-1 — W-5) on Lot 2 that apparently show a delineated wetland edge. Figure 1, below, shows the general location of North Lake and Figure 2 shows the parcels of interest at the south end of the lake. Aerial photographs for 2013, 2012, 2009, 2007 and 1936, available at the King County Parcel Viewer Website (available at: htt :li isma skin count ovl arcelviewer2/), show patches of aquatic bed vegetation along the southern shore of North Lake. The patches of vegetation most visible in the photographs are those where plants, such as water lily, extends to or above the water's surface. More extensive areas that appear to include submerged aquatic bed vegetation are also visible in the photographs. The distribution of aquatic bed vegetation in the aerial photographs varies from year to year due, in part, to the time of year the photograph was taken and also, apparently, due to vegetation management within the lake. ' The SMA implementing rules (WAC 173-22-030(1)) define "Associated wetlands" as those wetlands in proximity to and that either influence or are influenced by a shoreline water. Wetlands below the OHWM would be within the shoreline water and only those portions of the wetland that extend landward from the OHWM would be considered to be associated under the SMA. Page 3 of 9 October 10, 2016 The North Lake Management District was formed to address ongoing concerns about water quality and the City has been implementing a management program to reduce the extent of aquatic vegetation, including fragrant water lily (Nymphaea odordta) within North Lake. - The primary means of aquatic weed control at North Lake has been through herbicide application and weed rakes (City of Federal Way 2015). Who're management activities may have altered the plant community, wetland delineation standards allow for consideration of other approaches in determining if wetland vegetation is present (Ch. 5, § 4.e. Managed plant communities, pp. 104 —105; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2010). Also, the federal definition of aquatic bed vegetation acknowledges that the distribution of plants varies within a year (growing season) and between years: "AQUATIC BED: Includes wetlands and deepwater habitats dominated by plants that grow principally on or below the surface of the water for most of the growing season in most years." (FGDC 2013). Figure 1. Annotated aerial photograph from the King County Parcel Viewer showing the general location of North Lake just east of 1-5 in the City of Federal Way and the area of interest for this study at the south end of the lake. Page 4 of 9 October 10, 2016 Figure 2. Annotated 2013 aerial photograph from the King County Parcel Viewer showing the parcels of interest (Lots 2, 5, 6 and 7) at the south end of North Lake. Floating aquatic bed vegetation is visible immediately offshore of Lots 5, 6 and 7. The NWI map shows a lacustrine aquatic bed wetland contiguous with the southern and western shorelines of North Lake (Figure 3). This wetland, extending from the upland to a water depth of approximately 2.5 meters (8.2 feet)2, is mapped at 12.21 acres in size. The waterward margin of the aquatic bed wetland polygon appears to be consistent with the mapped 5- and 10-foot bathymetric contours for North Lake (Figure 4; Washington State Water Program 1973). 2 With the 2013 update to the federal wetland classification system, the boundary between wetland and deepwater habitat was changed from 2 meters depth to 2.5 meters (8.2 feet) (FGDC 2013). Page 5 of 9 October 10, 2016 v dhWb"4W&vz Figure 3. Screenshot of the NWI map for North Lake showing a lacustrine aquatic bed wetland along the western and southern shores of North Lake. The mapped area of the aquatic bed wetland is 12.21 acres. Page 6 of 9 October 10, 2016 NORTH LAKE —KING COUNTY T21 N-94E—Sec15 56 Surface Acres Surv. 7 March 1950—Stale Dept of Game Volume-816 Acre Feet �1 ff�l_ I ins O /000 1 1 1 t 1 1 SCALE IN FEET Figure 4. Mapped bathymetric contours (feet) for North Lake (Washington State Water Program 1973). Field Investigation Thank you for taking time to join me for the North Lake site visit on September 7, 2016. Your familiarity with the permitting history on the parcels we visited was a big help in understanding the setting. During our site visit, we looked for wetland and OHWM indicators along the lakeshore. We were also able to see wetland vegetation, including scrub -shrub, emergent and aquatic bed communities at and below OHWM on the parcels of interest. Aquatic bed vegetation was visible approximately 12 feet waterward of the OHWM along the western parcels (Lots 5 — 7; Photo 1). On Lot 2 and to the east, emergent vegetation was found below OHWM and aquatic bed was seen just offshore (Photos 2 and 3). Observed OHWM indicators included a distinct topographic break along the upland edge that was demarcated by a small rockery, water marks on the rockery, a change in the dominant plant community (from wetland to upland) and substrate changes. On Lot 2, the OHWM extended to the landward edge of the wetland, encompassing a small island. The topographic survey (Barghausen Consulting Engineers, 9-23-14) incorrectly shows the North Lake OHWM on the waterward side of the island and wetland on Lot 2. Page 7 of 9 October 10, 2016 Conclusion Ecology concurs with the flagged OHWM boundary on Lots 5 — 7. We do not concur with the OHWM boundary shown on Lot 2 nor do we concur with the determination that the aquatic bed wetland in North Lake does not extend onto the parcels of interest. The OHWM on Lot 2 is coincident with the landward wetland edge. Based on my review of available background information and our site visit on September 7th, Ecology has determined that the wetland below OHWM on all of the subject parcels is greater than 2,500 sf and therefore, subject to regulation under SMP Appendix A. This conclusion is based on the following factors: • Aquatic bed vegetation was visible immediately offshore along all of the parcels we visited on September 7th; • The NWI has mapped a contiguous lacustrine aquatic bed wetland (12.21 acres) along the southern and western shores of North Lake; • Aquatic bed vegetation is visible along the shoreline of interest in several aerial photographs dating back to 2007; • Active management for aquatic weeds has very likely impacted the distribution of aquatic bed vegetation in North Lake; • Only five percent cover is required to consider an area vegetated and in areas subject to vegetation management, delineation standards allow for other approaches to making a wetland determination (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2010); and • the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington, 2014 Update (Hruby 2014) provides specific guidance for situations where there may be an unvegetated gap within lake fringe wetlands (see § 4.4, p. 23). Based on the wetland categories described in SMP Appendix A3, i believe the lake fringe wetland on the subject parcels would be rated as a Category II wetland as it is greater than 2,500 sf in area, is contiguous with a water body that supports a fish population and is greater than one acre in size (SMP Appendix A § 6.13.(a)(2)). Standard buffers for Category Il wetlands shall be 100 feet (SMP Appendix A § 6.B.(b)(2)), which in this case would be measured from the OHWNI/wetland edge. References City of Federal Way. 2015. North Lake Management District 2015 Final Report. Public Works Department, Surface Water Management Division. Federal Geographic Data Committee. 2013. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. FGDC-STD-004-2013. Second Edition. Wetlands Subcommittee, Federal Geographic Data Committee and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. 3 Interestingly, one of the criteria for Category I wetlands includes open water as a habitat class (SMP Appendix A § 6.B.(a)(1)c.). Page 8 of 9 October 10, 2016 Hruby, T. 2014. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington, 2014 Update. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication # 14-06-029, Lacey, WA. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0). U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Environmental Laboratory, Vicksburg, MS. Washington State Water Program. 1973. Lakes of Washington, Volume 1, Water Supply Bulletin 14. Olympia, WA. Site Photographs Photo 1. Site visit photograph of North Lake from Lot 6 just waterward of OHWM showing aquatic bed vegetation within approximately 12 feet of OHWM; facing north. I I Page 9 of 9 October 10, 2016 Photo 2. OHWM and emergent, obligate wetland vegetation (Iris pseudacorus, Persicaria hydropiper and Typha latifotia) below OHWM on Lot 2. The white line marks the OHWM on a small island; the OHWM to the landward (south) of the island was coincident with the wetland edge. Emergent vegetation extended out into the lake and aquatic bed vegetation was also visible just offshore; facing north. Leila Willoughby -Oakes From: Anderson, Paul S. (ECY) <paan461@ECY.WA.GOV> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 8:25 AM r - • L To: Leila Willoughby-OakesCc: Pater, David (ECY) r_ Subject: RE: North Lake wetland i Leila: The consensus of Ecology wetland staff is that the aquatic bed wetland along the south and west shoreline of North Lake should be considered contiguous with the strip of scrub -shrub wetland identified on the site plans. Pertinent language from the current wetland rating system includes the following: Section 4.4 — 2014 Wetland Rating System for Western WA. "Sometimes a strip of open water is found between the wetland plants farther from shore and those closer to shore. In this situation, the open water is considered a part of one unit that encompasses both the rooted submerged plants offshore and the shore -side plants. The absence of plants in the area of open water may only be temporary, or the submerged plants are present but not visible because they do not grow to the surface. The plants may also be absent due to wave action or physical removal." The National Wetlands Inventory maps the aquatic bed wetland as 12.21 acres. Therefore, the wetland is greater than 2,500 square feet and would qualify as a regulated wetland in the Federal Way Municipal Code. My initial interpretation of the wetland categories listed in SMP Appendix A, is that this is a Category II wetland that meets criteria (2)a. (a water body with fish) and b. (> 1 acre in size). I will provide the City with a formal write-up of Ecology's findings when I return from vacation the first week of October. If there is anything else we can do in the meantime, or if you have any other questions about this project, please let me know. I will be working today and then on vacation until Oct. Td Paul Paul S. Anderson, PWS Wetlands/401 Unit Supervisor Washington State Department of Ecology 3190 - 160th Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Phone: (425) 649-7148 Cell: (425) 765-4691 Fax: (425) 649-7098 Email: Paul. S.AndersQnCa7ecy_,wa.gav 07 ESA memorandum 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206.789.9658 phone 206.789.9684 fax date April 21, 2016 to Leila Willoughby -Oakes, City of Federal Way Department of Community Development from Christina Hersum and Ilon Logan subject Wetland Determination Review: Na, Pierson, and Tran Properties, Federal Way www.esassoc,com This memo provides a summary of our review of a wetland determination conducted by C. Gary Schulz for Tax Parcel Numbers 442060-0025 and 442060-0030, as well as a summary of our wetland reconnaissance investigation of Tax Parcel Number 442060-0035. The three parcels (442060-0025, 442060-0030, and 442060- 0035) are the Na, Pierson, and Tran properties Iocated at 30XXX S 3371h Street in Federal Way, Washington. Mr. Shulz's wetland determination was reported in a letter to Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated October 25, 2014 and included an additional parcel (Tax Parcel Number 442060-0010) that was not part of our review. Review of Documents Environmental Science Associates (ESA) reviewed the wetland determination, the wetland data sheets (1-4), and a copy of the wetland delineation map provided in the letter produced by Mr. Schulz. The conclusions and information provided in these portions of the document were used to compare to the site conditions observed during the ESA site visit (described below). The wetland determination conducted by Mr. Schulz references parcels 442060-00I0, 442060-0025, and 442060-0030 and concludes that no wetlands or streams were observed on parcels 442060-0025 and 442060- 0030. According to the wetland data sheets, Mr. Schulz based his conclusions on two field visits in early October 2014. The data sheets indicate that one wetland parameter (vegetation) was observed at two data plots and no evidence of the other wetland parameters (hydrology, or soils) was observed. Site Review of Wetland Determination ESA wetland biologists Michael Muscari and Christina Hersum conducted a site visit on April 5, 2016 to observe site conditions on the properties. We observed existing soil conditions, hydrology sources and patterns, and vegetation communities in order to make a determination whether conditions in any portion of the study area meet the definition of wetland in the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC). No efforts to delineate the boundaries of any identified we ds were trade during the April site visit. Pe FWRC 19.145.410, therpresence or absence of wetlands was etermined based on the methodology in the Westr eWi Mounwws,�r6,5, and Coasts Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual. The methodology outlined in the manual is based upon three essential characteristics of wetlands: (1) hydrophytic vegetation-, (2) hydric soils; and (3) wetland hydrology. Field indicators of these three characteristics must all be present in order to determine that an area is a wetland (unless problem areas or atypical situations are encountered). Page 1 of 3 IF- ESA 6 Na, Pierson, and Tran Properties Wetland Review April 21, 2016 The three subject parcels are undeveloped and dominated by a mix of coniferous and deciduous trees, and shrubs. We observed vegetation species and dug multiple soil sample pits to a depth of 18 inches. Near the edge of the lake, we observed soil conditions that met hydric soil criteria in multiple locations, indicating wetland conditions. Soils were characterized as a 10 YR 2/1 (Munsell color chart) silty loam, which is consistent with hydric soil indicator A11 (depleted below dark surface). At each of the soil pit locations that had hydric soil indicators, wetland hydrology and wetland -vegetation were also observed. Wetland hydrology indicators included saturation from 5 inches to at least a depth of 12 inches from the surface of the soil pit. All of the dominant vegetation at the hydric soil pit locations was hydrophytic (i.e., water tolerant) species and included red alder and salmonberry. Based on our observations during the site visit, we agree with Mr. Schulz that the majority of the area investigated does not support'vvetlands. However, dare iripntifed an narrow strip of lake-frinop wetland alnnv the chore. of North Lake that appears to extend across the three subject parcels. The wetland originates as a narrow (1-2 feet wide) strip on the westernmost parcel and extends east along the shore in discontinuous patches that are located both above and below the ordinary high water mark of the lake. The wetland has dense vegetative cover provided by shrubs and trees (see photos). No problem area or atypical conditions were noted during the site visit. ESA's scope of work did not include completion of a wetland rating form. However, because the wetland is associated with Noah Lake, we note that it is likely to be classified as a Category 11 or ill wetland based on the Ecology Wetland Rating Manual (as re u�ire_d by the City of Federal Way), The standard buffer required for this wetland likely overlaps a portion of each 6f—t e-t'iirec pa�` r eelsinvesttgate3 as part of this review. Recommendations Based upon our field investigation and other documentation provided, ESA recommends the following: • The lake -fringe wetland in the northern portion of the three subject parcels should be delineated following methods required by the FWRC pursuant to the Corps 1987 Manual and regional supplement. Data plots should be established within and outside of the wetland to document the delineation. ■ The wetland should be rated based on the methods required by the FWRC and a standard buffer should be applied and shown on a parcel map. Limitations Within the limitations of schedule, budget, seasonal constraints, and scope -of -work, we warrant that this study was conducted in accordance with generally accepted environmental science practices, including the technical guidelines and criteria in effect at the time this study was performed. The results and conclusions of this report represent the authors' best professional judgment, based upon information provided by the project proponent in addition to that obtained during the course of this study. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. The wetland boundaries, classifications and ratings should be considered subject to change until reviewed and approved by regulatory agencies. Page 2 of 3 r -*+•' � _�*: err.=,�iT�s:Nf,= .•r;r T� }.t 5 - 7 T6 CITY OF == - --•- MAR 2 1 20 I Federal Way CITY OF �S RAL WAY FILE NUMBER I - Applicant NAME MI TRAN BUSINESSIORGANIZATION MAILING ADDRESS 13008 SE 305TH CT P 1 A REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D>;VELOPMENT 33325 0' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.citvnlfede_r_ la waY.com CJ A 4ate 03/18/2016 PRIMARY PHONE 253-880-8174 ALTERNATE PHONE - 253-737-7250 M TRAN163@GMAIL.COM CITY 1 STATE ZIP - PAX AUBURN WA 98092 Property Address/Location 30XX S 337TH ST (LOT 7)- _ FEDERAL WAY, WA 98001 zftzo�D PEER REVIEW OF WETLAND REPORT TO DETERMINE BUFFER ZONE FOR BUILDING SINGLE FAMILY HPOME Description of Request List/Describe Attachments 1. PRE -APPLICATION WETLAND STUDY (2014) 2. PURCHASE AND SALE EMAIL TO POTENTIAL BUYER 3. WETLAND DELINEATION/CITY SURVEY -MAPPING For Staff Use - Code Interpretation/Clarification Critical Areas Letter/Analysis/Peer Review ❑ Request for Extension (Land Use/Plat Approval) ❑ Revisions to Approved Permit Tree Removal Zoning Compliance Letter - No Fee - No Fee (Actual Cost if Applicable) - Check Current Fee Schedule Check Current Fee Schedule - : No Fee - Check Current Fee Schedule Bulletin #079 — January 4, 2016 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Request for Administrative Decision C. Gary Schulz October 25, 2014 Mr. Thomas Barghausen, P.E. President Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72"d Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032 Wetland/Forest Ecologist 7700 S. Lakeridge Drive Seattle, Washington 98178.3135 A 206/772/6514 — 206-920-5489 cell Re: Wetland Determination for North Lake Properties: City of Federal Way, WA. Dear Mr. Barghausen: A wetland determination was conducted for the NortiA Cake Properties located along S. 337`h Street at the intersection with 331a Place S. in Lt city of Federal Way (Assessor Parcel #s 4420600010, 4420600025, 4420600030). Tr Properties are vacant, waterfront land on North Lake just north of Weyerhaeuser Way S. The total area of these Properties above Ordinary High Water is approximately 1.25 acre, One wetland area was observed on -site. North Lake is designated as a State Shoreline. Rece. it communication with city staff indicated the subject Properties are identified in the ckv's Shoreline Master Program as "Residential" with a 50-foot Shoreline setback. This wetland report includes a wetland delineation ai-:d characterization of the on -site wetland. The wetland field data forms are attached. A professional survey map showing existing topography and the delineated wetland bouz..1jary will be submitted with this letter report as a full-sized drawing (Boundary and Tolographic Survey for Washington Federal, Barghausen Consulting Engineers 9/23/14). Site Description The subject properties are vacant lakefront lots th�-!�. have been partially cleared or disturbed from past use. The Properties have tree cover comprised of native and non- native species. The easternmost lot (Parcel 2 -- AF't 4420600010) has been mostly cleared and maintained as lawn. 'The western parcels (- PN 4420600025 & 4420600030) have Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), red alder ;11nus rubra), Western red cedar (Thuja plicata), and big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllu.,a) trees covering most of the area �idjace ll to the Lake, The dominant tree cover on Ae south side of these parcels is planted sugar maple (Acer saccharum) trees and laurel MAR 21 2016 l CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Mr. Tom Barghausen, North Lake Properties October 25, 2014 Page 2 The western parcels have, shrub cover that includes Western hazelnut, salmonberry, Himalayan blackberry, and scattered salal groundcover3, The highly disturbed areas from past clearing are dominated by English ivy (Hedera (relax) groundcover. All of these Properties are relatively flat. Purpose / Methodology The primary purpose of this report is to identify the ext--nt of wetland and wetland buffer area present on the Property. Identification of wetland and buffer areas will allow for site planning. This report is purposely brief due to the related size of the property and limited site features. Wetlands are determined where vegetation, soils, and hydrology all reflect that hydric conditions are present on a site. In accordance with current State requirements, the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (FICWD 1987) was used for wetland determination. The methodology is bases; on the presence of dominant hydrophytic vegetation (i.e, plant species adapted to, of tolerant of, growing in saturated soil conditions), hydric soils, and observed wetland hydrology as described in the Manual and consistent with the Regional Supplemental to je, Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (US Army Corps of Engineers 20110). Data for wetland determination was collected on,I the Properties during the site investigation. The observed site conditions warranted ystalling data plots in lowland and potential wetland areas. A total of four wetland data. plots were installed to document wetland boundaries. The wetland data plot forms are attached to this letter. In addition, the professional survey map depicting wetland area, ;data plot locations, and wetland buffer is attached as an 11 x 17 inch drawing (Wetland Delineation Map - Boundary and Topographic Survey Barghausen Consulting Engineers ?/23/14). Wetland Determination The Properties were investigated in October 2014.. Based on the investigation of observed soils, hydrology, and dominant vegetation, one small area of wetland was delineated on the easternmost lot. Wetland W's boundary crosses the eastern lot (Parcel 2 — APN 4420600010) along the edge of North Lake. Mr. Tom Barghausen, North Lake Properties October 25, 2014 Page 3 Soil According to the King County Area Soil Survey (US Soil Conservation Service 1973), the property is mapped as having Alderwood gravelly ,sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes (AgB). The Alderwood soil series is associated with �'�pland habitats and is moderately well drained and formed in glacial deposits. This series includes the poorly drained and hydric Norma, Bellingham, Seattle, Tukwila, and Shalcar soils that occur in depressions and drainageways. Disturbed soil conditions were observed on the Properties related to past clearing and grading activities. Hydrology Wetland W appears to be a seasonally ponded area depending on the water level of North Lake. Streams or drainage channels were not observed"On the Properties. Based on local topography seasonal surface water runoff drains to the Lake. Wetland W Wetland W is a narrow, lake -fringe wetland that extends off -site on both sides of the eastern lot (Parcel 2 — APN 4420600010). The on -site area is comprised of emergent vegetation cover. Dominant vegetative cover in the wetland includes speedwell (Veronica sp.) marsh willow -herb (Epilobium palustre)' silverweed (Potentilla anserina), and hard -stern bulrush (Scirpus acutus). Based on the City's Critical Areas code listed below, Wetland W is rated as Category II because it is a wetland contiguous with a water body that supports fish and appears to be greater than 2,500 square feet in size. Category II wet4 'nds have a standard buffer of 100 feet (FWRC 15.10.250 (2)). Federal Way Revised Code - Chanter 15.10.25 D 1 (b) Category H wetlands are greater than 2,500 square feet in area, do not exhibit the characteristics of Category I wetlands, and meet one of 'the following criteria: (i) Are contiguous with water bodies or tributaries to water bodies which under normal circumstances contain or support a fish population, including streams where flow is intermittent; or (ii) Are greater than one acre in size in their entirety; or,, (iii) Are less than or equal to one acre in size in their entirety and have two or more wetland classes, with neither class dominated by nonnative invasive species. E Mr. Tom Barghatisen, North Lake Properties October 25, 2014 Page 4 Summary Three legal parcels (Assessor Parcel #s 4420600010, .4420600025, 4420600030) were reviewed for the presence of wetlands or streams. O C small wetland area was field - delineated and surveyed on the North Lake Properties. The standard wetland buffer setback is 100 feet. The "Residential" Shoreline sett::ack .is 50 feet. If there are any questions or concerns regarding this wetland report or you require additional site -specific data, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, C. Gary .` 1111 x Wetland/Forest Ecologist bear4all@yalioo.com WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Norlh l-ake?ar is City/County .{ ec rral WaWKinn Sampling Date: 1013114 Applicant/Owner: 9aruhaµsen Engineers State: WA Sampling Point: 1 Investigator(s): Gary Schulz Section, Township, Range: �1_TMN R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): phogine Local relief (concave convex, none): none Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: _ Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: ATdaw.Qod atavellysan NWI classification: Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? Yes ® No ❑ (Ir no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are "Nollmal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problemallc? (If need, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing safnpling point locations, trmnsects, important features, etc. Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No ❑ Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0 Is the Samples' Area Yes ❑ No 0 within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0 Remarks: Plot area has been mowed and probably graded from past use. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants _ Tree.9lraf (Plot size: ) Absolute goCove r 00mimni soccies7 Indicator Status 1, _ -- 2. T — 3 — 4 — 50% _ 20 % _ = Total Cover Sayllno rub Stratum (Plot size: 1lIOU acre) 1, salix 3Q. 10 no FAC 2. 4.- 5. --- — 50% _ , 20% _ _. 10 = Total Cover Herb.Strgtum(Plot size: 11 re) 1, WW 2ffli tdawM 15 des EH-C 2. Rorosfk lenuls 15 yes F C 3. Coralflum fR 50 yes FACU 4. GaNum sn. 10 no FACU 5. — 6. — y. _ — 8. �.. — 9. 10. — 50% = , 201% _ 90 = Total Cover WoWy Vine Stratum (Plot size: _) 50 % _ , 20% _ = Total Cover % Bare Ground in I lerb Stratum Remarks: C'ominance Test Worksheet: I mber of Dominant Species 2 (A) --',at Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ':tal Number of Dominant 3 (B) pecies Across All Strata: Parcent of Dominant Species 66 (AIS) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of MUMMY kv t_9L species x1 = FACW species x2 = FAG species x3 = J FACU species x4 = t; PL species x5 = :.olumn Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Eydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 — Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation `T 2 - Dominance Test Is >50% 1 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) C-J 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' (� Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain) r;ndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must he present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Yes © No ❑ Present? US Army Corps of Engineers Weslern Mounlains, Valleys, and Coast — Version 2 0 Project Site: North Lako Parcols SOIL Banrplu Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) Color (moist) % Type' oc2 Texture Remarks 3 10YR212 100 Y — sandy loam dry( 17 10YR312 100 • 4 _ randy loam div mixed with wood debris - disturbed 19 10YR411 50 sandy loam gravelly, c ed - fill laveLZ 10YR412 50_ 'Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletlon, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Boll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) ❑ Hislosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Hlstic Eplpedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) r ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) I ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (FB) Restrictive Layer (If present): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls": ❑ 2 cm Muck (Ato) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, imfess dtsturho d or orobleinatic. Hydrlt. Solis Present? Welland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water-Slained Leaves (B9) 1 [] High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Sediment Deposits (82) ❑ 3 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living R fots (C3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils ,. '.6) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Stunted or Stresses Plants (131) (LRR rh) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) Field Observations: Yes ❑ No 19 Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphlr, Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No @ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No El Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Preeent7 Yes ❑ No (tncludes oapillary fdngel Describe Recorded Data islream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Motantains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: North Laka Paf gJ5 City/County Federal Wn Iv Kind Sampling Date: 10 3/14 Applicant/Owner: Barghowert jwngincors Slala: WA Sampling Point: 2 Investigalor(s): Gary Schula Section, Township, Range: 21.T21N.R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): shoreline Local relief (concav(-, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR): LaL — Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Akterwgod gravelly sandyfoam (AfiQ NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are "N,Timal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If need4d, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ H y dric Soil Presont7 Yes ❑ No ® Is the Same within a We Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Plot area has been mowed and probably graded from past use. VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree S[mlum (Plat size; ) Hn Co1r Sited- Status 1. — — — 2. 3' - — 4 — 50 % _ —, 20 % _ _ — = Total Cover SaulinWShrub SIMI_um (Plot size: 110j)_) 1. nla" 2. 3. 4 — 5- — 50 % _ , 20 % _ = Total Cover Herr, Stratum (Plot size: 11100 acre) 1. Lofp cif y[{irus 15 yes FAC 2. A rosff fe rrrs 65 +Les FAC 3. V9!cAff_!R gsuq T no FAC 4. Gallum so. 5 nc FACU 5.- 6. - — 7. v -- — — 10, — 50% —, 20 % _ 90 = Total Cover Woody Vino Siq[!m (Plot size: ) 1- — — 2.- 50% _ 20% _ = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum RemarksT T US Army Corps of Engineers t;ansects, Important features, etc. de;:: Area Yes ❑ No tlr nd7 r,ominance Test Worksheet: %umber of Dominant Species 2 (A) hat Are OB L, FACW, or FAC: otal Number of Dominant 2 (B) Species Across All Strata: Fercent of Dominant Species 100 (A/B) hat Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % vor Pf,, MuLl I ::31 species x1 = — :,tCW species x2 = AC species x3 = — t ACU species x4 = PL species x5 = :olunin Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = P:/drophytic Vegetation Indicators: i ] 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation t,�g 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <9.0' -:� 4 - Morphological Adaptaliona' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or an a separate sheet) f'] 5 - Welland Non -Vascular Plants' C] Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ' ndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must tin present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation F'resent7 t --- Yes O No ❑ Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast -Version 2.0 Project Site: North Lake Parcels SOIL Sampling Point:2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the sbsence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) solar (moist) % Color (moist) h Type' I'm, Texture Remarks 17 10YR212 100 sandy toam d[y mxed vylih vigod dobfis-dl urbgd 19 10YR411 50 =_ sandy. !gqj7i grwelly,,al,till..{ayer7 v 10YR412 50 'Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletlon, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydrlc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc SoIW: ❑ Histosol (All) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (Al0) ❑ Hisllc Eplpednn (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except M'.RA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydrlr Soils Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Waler-Slained Leaves (B9) ❑ High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (611) ❑ Water Marks (81) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Drift Deposits (03) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living R:0rols (C3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) %• ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (r::5) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No 0 Depth (inches): Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (89) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquilard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (DS) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? (includes capillaryfringa) Describa Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Yes ❑ No ❑ + Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Silo: North Lakq Pang CitylCounty; k is Sampling Date: 1013114 ApplicanUOwner: 9arohausen Engineer; stale: WA Sampling Point: 3 Invesligator(s): Gary Schulz Section, Township, Range: 21 T2 NN R4R4E Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): shoreline Local relief (concavf, convex, none): none Slope Subregion (LRR): Let: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Ald rw d arayelly sAndyNWI classification: Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain In Remarks,) Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are "No not Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, trmsects, important features, etc. Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Welland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Is the Samples Area within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Plot is near Lake edge with native vegetation. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant ISta�tus Free Strahrm (Plot size: M00 a ) Ca�v r s[reGes? 1. Thum nflcale 1 o no FAC 2. Af us re 10 no FAC 3. 4. _ _ — 50 % _ _, 20% _ _ 20 = Total Cover 3B2J1nWShrub Stratum (Plot size: Ill00 acre) 1. Saf/xggouferana T no FAC 2. Rubus gneclal><Ils 60 Yf-S FAC 3. �.. — 4. 5. — — 50 % _, 20% _ _ BO = Total Cover Hpprb Sera um (Plot size: 11100 acre) 1. kalltara SP 15 no FAC 2 — n/a' _ 3 n/a` _. 4. nla' 6. 7. 50% -.. 20% mL5 = Total Cover Woggy VI a gr1ralum {Plot size: ) 1. — 2. -- 50% _ _, 20% Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Dominance Test Worksheet: Yes ❑ No r unbar of Dominant species 1 (A) f iat Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: — l rtal Number of Dominant 1 (B) 11 pecies Across All Strata: — I'. Farceni of Dominant Species 100 (A/B) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: Tola %. oVjff.R; MULIQUJIM : 131_ species x1 = > ,,CW species x2 = �C species x3 = F4CUspecies x4= UaL species x5 = ColumnTolals;' (A) (B) Prevalence Index = BIA = Hydrophyttc Vegetation Indicators: [] 1 — Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation l 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting [' data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 5-Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' C,7 Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain) lydicalors of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must s present, unless disturbod or problematic. k;ydrophytic VWgetation Yes [) No ❑ Present? Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2 0 Project Site: North Lake Parcels SOIL aamirnr ruin .a Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Lac' Texture Remarks 17 10YR3l3 100 Gan too with nea gravel. dry Iq 7.5YR2.511 100 silty oroams like gid yqWjagr 'Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletlon, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains,� ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Malrix Hydrlc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solis': ❑ Hislosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (55) r, ❑ 2 cm Muck (Al0) ❑ Hlstic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ! i ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Hislic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except M.sRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) Cl Sandy Murky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (FB) unless disturbed or proir3emallc. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (Inches): Hydrlc.. Solis Present? Yes Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (B2) • Drift Deposits (133) • Algal Mal or Crust (B4) ❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) © Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) J• ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living R;>ots (C3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (('6) ❑ Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ No Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): _ Saturalion Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (Incites): Wetland Hydrology Present? ¢ncludes capillary fringe) _• . Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if av,:-ilable Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Yes ❑ No Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2,n WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mot:ntains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: North Lake Parcels City/County. Federal'lyavlHing Sampling Date: 1016114 Applicant/Owner. Rarghbysen Engineers Stale: WA Sampling Point: 4 Investigalor(s): Gary Schulz Seclion, Township, Range: 21.T21N.R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): shoreline Local relief (concavy' convex, none): none slope Subregion (LRR): Lat: :Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: AIlcignM2d gravelly sandy loam fAstB} NWI classification: — Are climatic! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No O Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If needled, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, tr3nsects, Important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Hydric Soil Present? Is the Sample �. Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetlei7id9ea Yes Cl No Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Plot is in a disturbed area. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants Tree 5lrahtrtl (Plat size: 1r1 ) Abacl0la Dominant Indicalor % Cover Species? Status I ominance Test Workshaet: 1. Acerseccireltfrrl ne —1 I :ember of Dominant Species 1 (A) 2. Salix sr ordarana 5 no FAC T :.at Are OBL, FACW, or PAC: 3. Crstaaeua so. 5 no FACU ",tal Number of DDMinant 1 (B) 4. 5 )ecies Across All Strata: 501%_ ,20%-- 20 =Total Cover FsrcenlofDominantSpecies 100 (A18) ,$acllnaiShrutr Simi um (Plot size: 1110a acre) ?)at Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: 1. Rubus discolor T no FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Rithus spectahifis T nr, FAC Total I Cover nt n I I b 3. _- ___ Q9L species x1 = 4, — F kw species x2 = 5, FAC species — x3 = 50% _ , 20 % _ T = Total Cover FACU species x4 = Herb Slratum,(Plot size: 11100 acre) l PL species x5 = 1. Nadore helix 80 des tl UPLA Clalumn Totals (A) (B) 2. — rda' Prevalence Index = BIA = 3. rda" Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4• iva" (1 1 — Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. i': 2 - Dominance Test is >50 % 6. _ __� _ __ �� 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0' 7. _ `... 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting _ t' data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. C 5 -Welland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. _ 1� Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain) 1hidicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 0%u = , 20% = 50 HO = Total Cover t-: present, unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) Hydrophytic 2 -- Vegetatlon Yes ❑ No 50 % _ , 20 % _ = Total Cover Fresent? Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: x t US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 Project Site: N h L ke A r e SOIL gamoltwIl Point:4 _J___ Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the Absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features o / (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) TType' r nc? Texture Remarks 17 10YR312 70 f hand loam JU _ 10YR412 ]!_0 'Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grain,,:! 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydrlc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Sails': ❑ Hlslosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Hlstic Eplpedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Hlsllc (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except M`.RA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 'Indicators of hydrop vegetation and Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ P wetland IAydrglogy must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrlctive Layer (if present): Type: Hydrl•. Soils Present? Yes ❑ No Deplh IInches 1: Remarks: i HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: i Secondary Indicators (2 or more required] Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (At) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks fB6) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) r1 Rnarsely Veoetated Concave Surface (BB) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Water-Stalned Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 46) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) r' ❑ Drainage Patterns (810) t ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living R- ols (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (132) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iran (C4) r ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3 ) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (i:6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No 0 Depth (inches); Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No 0 Depth (inches); Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No 0 Depth (inches): �� Wetland Hydrology Present? (Includes capillary fringe) �— Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if av .itlable Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Yes ❑ No Western Mountains, Valleys: and Coast - Version 2.0 I 1: 11UU 0 I o~ I N } E O ' 4 +sz+w C N H roH y 0 - y al.+iL: L 619360 p 0375 I j it appears that 60385 the true SW cor of Sec 15 may lie north of its -•----- ,indicated position .9 f 1 'LCxJs 15 5 , 74_ ,e 060 9300 SF 36 NORTH LAKE 4 c _.1:.6r$p moo•• S 1� 14 y �T' 'S 21210 ' ' S Sj-•. 5 5900 SF ���5 i HYCR oass� 13 +ph �y8 `�8 _ E + ,7s's<z0 S s0 `�6 10025 7f00 SF fpL �� 0035 9y , 7 L yG 12 S� m' 9300 SF 9 11 D`� Ig R 10 y Jti cy' x 10 / 3 .:0200 5r 100, we 3y 44,206 ti ry x n • 8 9 7 My . rc0 e. ,f A t� q 3 m., 2 3700 SF C' . 5 G,1 442060 OCR :5 n /Z` 6 °0zs n _W% �A LO rtsx. ^ `0 m I 00+0 + . 18238#- :� o p m 501 VOL. q i2 14337 S 43 / 7Us+0 19500 SF 17000 SF $ 29900 SF 2 15557 S 25990 S 10557 5 0030 0025 �- 0010 T ,x 75 i /. 70 �,� d'�9 Sp Y .. (NOT TO SCALE) old C4 -----�----�_"__._.._.,.-----------_'-_—f Al 0 P MAR 21 2016 CITY OF FEDERAL iNA' CDS I NORTH LAKE '6co a SITE �3 L� S 33611St Slavic Gosael Church ihi I;;t C07i V 11ieye(I e.euF_e: Real E*ltate VICINITY MAP 1°=500' BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY I J\J r H w fAk If � %• � A K E .� ,�c �.' LINE OF OF ORDINARY -------------- --------------- 396 .65 95.61 396.76 397.21 396,85_�-•� / \ ' 396.42 -�, 398.70 �398.a FLAG DP-3'� 397.09. 396.73 ,! 399.36 Y \ //: 396.72 B.,A I, / --- -40 0*0 3ss.s�, W % -- s97 sy ' LINE OF ORDINARY HIGH WATER 394.62 94.29 I �1-3 /1.�CJ8.00 -{-39g;¢p395.75 FLAG W-5 ��.49h.62 /�3 W-4 ^(� 395:96T, 5.59 �,jC:v�•6.09 . 9�`:)0 \ 6''"� �_ 395.86 98 �395J3 /�j"`•••���y"'--- `- \ FND. REBAR & CAP a96:os 96.24 LS 12399 0.1'W OF LINE � ' FLAG DP6-� 1 71 ssa:63 FLAG W-3 ..4.. 396.77 395.� 396.26 0.6 -�_394.76 �-394 FLAG W-2 FLAG DP-2 394.60 394.57 396.17 � 6.33 396.42 �395.33 FND. REBAR & CAP A �t.63\L9 LS 12399 0. VW �F L�NE _ LAG W 1 / 396.32 C O COT 396.56 7 F r�L.�'398 36 - - 'FND 1 /2" IMP "``- -- _ ,.. -- ' PLASTIC --- FN " ----- _ �C U-POST FENCE \\ .-- -36 F o s �39 6 1.0'E OF LINE .1 -- i 3.43 LINE IP f , / �398.56 \39659 39i.8, UNSUBSTANTIAL PLA 96. , •{ i WOOD FENCE IS / 0.1E OF LINE G'F - i JIM12[n / �`a97.9s I � o z t' 400.55 \ I o 30M �� 397.43 39 43 11 \' FND. 1 1 /4" IP 396.87 Ta .2-4 - -`- 2.1'E OF LINE 1397.a'7 397.28 ------------ 397.37 / v d4„F O=_402.99 N-'.'--- - iy ; FLAG DP-4 9 I _/_. 7s7 / h `V aoor9 0 • • , 40295 403.38 397. t N I ¢03.3i 0 M 397. CASED MONUMENT t -- , - ` \ , 1 I � t BRASS PLUG W/PUNCH 4 I I o i -- i:,o3.3s f,/ �/ \•�8 /8 M`<•� \ - / 399 7l� FND. HUB & TACK v (9-20-14) 34"F : -\ 10"M o> f {� ' o \ \ I 0. VW OF LINE s ,+/ 6 A /' j , ' /`%' ' 14„ C \` ^ 'J i �., 399.30 39887 I �19 __,�''L0.43g:--_��__ %� �-y -, , � '� � ! 399.02 ..- ` ,� p N. END 'OF 9' 98.89 �Qo 8j ��ry +403.7, 399.m CHAINLINK FENCE co \ 1 y' o -- j/ 4„0 !% ' i', / IS 3.9'W OF Ll E,� / �401.26 404,63 \,- ---------- ~-'-�4f13.65 -/-407.2s 6 �-399.23 � I f ' % f ,, r �.. 401.36 I 3 "WA 399.95 1 404.50 403. ` \ -� 400.65 '�• �' N 40182 _ - - 40517 •1 I \ t,` ;''10"H` o /^ WOOD FENCE CORNER IS �- f \ �° 4 iN x d C1-t�LINK- , ° 0.2'W OF L I cv / 0'yV 01= / + 404.6a 20. \\ 8„M : �' f` `t _ o \ ,O 10"C % FND. 1 3/4" IP lg 5' `') 400a3' /t, Q - `� \ p .+' 1 dC0.36 I , -') 40D.19 D0. 399.85 / 0.6 W OF LINE = I o �405.0, *jw2zz --''" 7 -: ; I N. END WOOD FENCE hca.)s / d ----- �401.14 IS 01'W _J OF LINE CONC. 1.8' W �40046 T p .j 402.811.ao,s7 WIRE FENCE CORNER IS OF LINE , _ `> _. _ _ 0.2'W OFLINE d yR, , 1 - Ox 10 M �4o3.e6 - --ao,6,ao,jr.. / I i `°° CHAINLR>1KoofsENCE x ° 4es.22 :�% PORTION OF I ;� _ IS 3.6'W OF LINE 401.39 i �- EXISTING �;- a03.98 40153 HOUSE I _ E S. END WOOD FENCE 1� \ f I 36 F o 40467 i' -- - WIRE FENCE IS / 400.37 IS 0.4'E OF LINE V d° -/ -t- / -- / I __ _ o g M 0>6'W OF LINE aoo.91 w,s 40.3.96. 40511 ', / '-�x ��\ \ 10° it2.27 �. - --- - - ;1 ii ` '1 bo1.¢a .. .. . I O ti_ II "A °- 6"A / ao2 C:� I SHED , F 1o"M I o' \,y a 329' k x ° 4�1a - _---1 _�-- 40,52 0 /,•' I 3.1 I d 403,56 413.14 -. _- - = ' 404.51 i 404.76� __-'_.(-- `�'\ '' ``+-` 10 M 40331 + o. /,. % \` 3.3' i \ - ` _.-F----- 16"H / d :> ... ROW OF POSTS FOR pr r _ J bp�55*' 10 M J GRAPE VINES ON LINE "q l_ --- r 6 A / ,-40313 46za3 9 /i PORTION OF 8"A ,Xi' 12'M \ ; 12"M \ J1 O '� " . '` \ I �`� t 40436 ao' _ j % 4oz9 ozus �4ms4 EXISTING Q§3.9 i°'`•'��'� _�----_-a'�..., ,. - ,.. :i;r'^°'a: -\rr , !' 1 A I HOUSE .�� 121M 12"M �:i409.37 4C6.3 ' / '�1'' ' 404.55 r' x / .2 1 I 3`7 \ I 1 ;y `s\ \ •'`� - WOODEN 40,.4�' END CHAINL NK FENCE - WOODEN ease /J i �'� t' 't ARBOR 0.3'N X 0.4'W OF CORNER ` p L M" 1 \` �1 �,, / l� `� ',,.. -�j'Y-`; -�_.._ %, a027t \..�:.. _ I �40t.68 401.6 6 3s°Co % ---% a `, r' �o"C «` f! ,WIRE' FENCE CORNER IS ' + z+fi '\ ` 0:2'W X 0.1'N OF UNSUBSTANTIAL PLASTIC /`, ., . t} 9.00' PROP. CORNER ` ....:.,' ,.. 402.48 I GRAPE 0 VINES OTN . L4ALE \ & U-POST ----- FENCE / % ao7.3z \ / ` f t \ M L $623r 79.00_ I _ _-y3.0' 0 J % �2 12"M / 7 406.00 "�+2:v` 4oga, �'l, O �,. 0 40292 ..a j - ��. 67.00' / �\ \/_ SHED I0z9s 4os.ae i ,' 1 _ _ ti. } / 41.7 , 46s.,6 4sss 12"M �= 4b�s "M,' i �I " ;7 ri' FND. REBAR CAP A i_ _ wss7 FND. 1 1/4 IP 10239 f o / / `4 -= I 7" `:403DY `�, C +I' LS 1 0.1'W =+L 1 O \ 2399 OF LINE 3" - 't""- 4oas7 0. E a aorss f / 0"M Faoass �.1 4 LU SEWER CLEANOUT 8A 1' `� oo \�/ I / \ / ' a6 oa.n j i ae��" 16"1 ? 40647 - i �.:: : RIM 402.02 402.7s bA • o,.c5 Q ^5 \� 1 i` 403.Oa . f0, §Gi h 40245 APPROX. IE 398.52 I ,, / �cb• 10 r�r'' \ 405.74 405.46 as z ( FND. R�BAR..& CAPo,-�..409.41, aoz65 •' �" i� L`' lGNDER PUMP ?/' 'ccpN J a07 i6`/ 405.11 �_ 4aa.Ea J a0a.3^• / ( ) .3 to _ !' d.39 404.48 ;�` ` 4�%5Z --------- so � 1s:.' ' n _ LS 12399 0.1 W OF LINE " t� z o F ui I o ! 4�7 n -� aos4aA ao5�9. 0aso /? aoa as �� �t / '.:. 402.66 2.5' X 1.5 LID c� -- r o - - Z4,0.36 \\\� __ ________� 404ag____ _ �6045}__ % \4p / /.� RIM=401.99 402.00 o 409.22 \ ---- s T /�---_l �'-�aoz,4 `� . ;.. ''` � -- --- - -rao3 �_ TOP OF PUMP 401.79 - � T WMPHALT � ' -. 443.fi8"= _•_ 'g0.33`L u �', .'-.: •\" 1„ 402.07 / --} wz6Q---- 4-4a2AZ----------- axa`-- TpP OF GRAVEL 400.59 I---h�o2 Ir / �� ^--------- F�az----------- aezas - - - - - --- �02A2------------ , 7_.'e------- doe.,s ao9.ss PRIVATE -t�b-> c i > 86.33' 409.07 / PROPERTY gig / \� I, a 4'169--- - 607.59 :�•-)`407. 5'�_40 /J.O9' -rL �404.95 L ° s- - 404.94 \� 8----- ,a5 o /� o6 154.47' CONCRETE VAULT CALCULATED 4oa.97 'B3 -7 - jaoaso = y �aoas3 POSITION °dozzo _ _ f4 . z 4oz2 405.35 I S88'58'03"E 640.00' - - - - 7 52.32' 1_ 'k OF r""���' _ - - f aes aa-i 50.002 �\�� w w 408,6 W W W N/ W w W W W w W W w w W �� w w w w w W W w S 337TH ST � STOP CASED MONUMENT ° STOP BRASS PLUG W/PUNCH (9-20-14) LEGEND (NOTE: NOT ALL SYMBOLS MAY APPEAR ON THE MAP) FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ___ GRAVEL/SAND (AS NOTED) TREE LEGEND O SET REBAR/CAP LS #45789 ASPHALT F FIR o FOUND REBAR/CAP (AS NOTED) BUILDING LINE C CEDAR ❑ SET HUB ON LINE X CHAIN LINK FENCE A ALDER MAILBOX - //- WOOD FENCE H HEMLOCK -O- POWER POLE BARBED WIRE FENCE P PINE o SEWER CLEANOUT HOGWIRE FENCE S SPRUCE n WATER VALVE (WV) - w WATER LINE COT COTTONWOOD IQ UNDERGROUND PWR. LINE WA WALNUT -P(0H)- OVERHEAD FIRE HYDRANT(FH) / ® WATER METER DECIDUOUS TREE HO HOLLY ❑ SIGN Q SEWER STRUCTURE CONIFEROUS TREE GUY POLE E -- GUY ANCHOR TREE DRIPLINE (R#) REFERENCE SURVEYS SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION: Q17 )XE � o_ G�r7NG ENG6N�01 s 0 10 20 40 SCALE: 1"-20' LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PER TRUSTEE'S DEED FILED UNDER E2667309, RECORDED BY WASHINGTON FEDERAL UNDER RECORDING NO. 20140512000885) LOTS 2, 5, 6 AND 7, LOUISE'S NORTH LAKE TRACTS, A REPLAT OF BLOCK 19, NORTH LAKE ADDITION TO EAST TACOMA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 40 OF PLATS, PAGE 23, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 442060-0010, -0025 & 0030 ADDRESS 31XX S. 337TH STREET FEDERAL WAY, WA 98001 BASIS OF BEARING (NAD83(1991) FEDERAL WAY) BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS PROJECT IS A LINE BETWEEN A FOUND FEDERAL WAY 3" BRASS MONUMENT KNOWN AS MONUMENT ID 4453 AND ANOTHER FEDERAL WAY 3" BRASS MONUMENT KNOWN AS MONUMENT ID 4529. CONTROL VALUES WERE HELD FOR THESE MONUMENTS TO HOLD THE MONUMENTS NAD83(1991) CONTROL VALUES AND A LINE BETWEEN THE MONUMENTS HELD AS NORTH 50.28'06" EAST. BASIS OF ELEVATION NAVD88 (KING COUNTY) BASIS OF ELEVATION WAS ESTABLISHED BY HOLDING PUBLISHED NAVD 88 ELEVATION OF A FEDERAL WAY SURVEY CONTROL MONUMENT, KNOWN AS NO. 4453 VERTICAL DATUM SOURCE: KING COUNTY CONTROL DATABASE ID #: 4453 DESCRIPTION: 3" BRASS MONUMENT LOCATION: CENTERLINE OF WEYERHAEUSER WAY S AT THE INT OF HIGHWAY 18 ELEV = 392.18' CHECKED INTO CON- '. POINT #4529; CLOSURE 0.06' NOTES 1. ALL DISTANCE SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY AREt -: J.EY FOOT 2. UTILITIES ARE SHOWN PER FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND AVAILABLE RECORDS. NO UNDER__' UND LOCATE SERVICES WERE EMPLOYED FOR THIS PROJECT. I,__EXACT LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES POTHOLING SHOULD BE PERFORMED. 3. DATE OF SURVEY WAS SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 AND ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS FOUND WERE VISITED AT THIS TIME. 4. DISTANCE FROM PLAT ON NORTHEAST LINE OF LOT 6 HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE ERRONEOUS IN RECORDS SUBSEQUENT TO THE PLAT AND ON THIS SURVEY AREA ABOVE ORDINARY HIGH WATER LOT 2 11,432 f S.F. (0.263t AC.) LOTS 5-7 43,214 t S.F. (0.992f AC.) REFERENCE SURVEYS 1. LOUISE'S NORTH LAKE TRACTS, VOL. 40, PG. 23 2. RECORD OF SURVEY, AFN 20100323900005 TITLE REPORT NO TITLE REPORT WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS SURVEY. EASEMENTS OF RECORD ARE NOT SHOWN. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY UPON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND CORRECTLY REFLECTS THE CONDITIONS OF THIS SITE AS OF THE DATE OF THE FIELD SURVEY IN SEPTEMBER, 2014. DATE OF PLAT OR MAP: SEPTEMBER 23, 2014 1 /09/2015 S wAAs�,�jN�� 45789 o a� ATE NAC L A SIGNED 1 /09/2015 �0, W t= N Z W c Q v/ U. U7 V U ? U. 0 uj Z Q H (i W W t/) o uw � O.. C)r LL O�z 0 atS Ill ZNZ Q CC = a. Y C o LL o Q m m M Z J 'Q 0 ■ ■ �, GC 0 M ® W I.IJ Q ~ LLJ U. 6 z O � O 0 WLjJ W r 0) W co QIr Z 0 Z O Y W 0 Z ~ L _1 = z N Q u Q Q �3 U. U. ° 5i c o ° U ° U (!1 L aN N 0- y m J J 7 � In Z F- F- I N c Y 0 03 0 = c!) Ld C) S I_ ::D z > z(If OLd J Z X Q z w w N g Z Q 1`) O CV N CV 00 Of m cc 00 z Q I I zw �LnLn 0z � f CIA � C14 Ln w � "e v C/) L M rl az z o s r r TREVOR S. LANKTREE, P!S WASHINGTON REGISTRATION NO. 45789