The URL can be used to link to this page

13-102595 AND 13-102596CITY OF � Federal July 8, 2013 Ms. Rachel Villa Soundview Consultant LLC 2907 Harborview Drive, Suite D Gig Harbor, WA 98335 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South FederaWay l Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com FILE Re: File #13-102595-00-UP and 13-102596-00-SE; Notice of INCOMPLETE APPLICATION Kim Residential Redevelopment — Process IV Stream Buffer Reduction Request Site Address: 29424 2nd Avenue SW, Federal Way Dear Ms. Villa: The Department of Community and Economic Development is in the process of reviewing information you submitted on June 12, 2013, for the proposal to remove a stream from a culvert and request to intrude into the 50-foot stream buffer area in order to construct a new single-family residence. The project is being reviewed under the provisions of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.70, "Process IV Process Hearing Examiner Review"; and FWRC Title 19, Division 5, "Critical Areas"; in addition to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). INCOMPLETE APPLICATION During the course of the city's review, the following items were found to be missing or incomplete. In order for your application to be considered complete and ready for processing, the items below must be provided. • Three sets of self-addressed, stamped business sized envelopes (with City of Federal Way return address) of persons receiving property tax statements for all properties within 300 feet of the boundary of the subject property. Include a list of the addresses with their parcel numbers and a corresponding assessor's map showing the 300- foot boundary. • Two copies of a current title report for the subject property. • Eight copies of site photographs from each compass point referenced on a site plan. Please also e-mail me the site photos in a digital format. The Public Works Development Services Division has identified the following items that must be submitted. • Since the project proposes to modify an existing drainage pipe and stream, Targeted drainage review as outlined in the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) will be required. An engineer licensed in the State of Washington must provide an offsite analysis, along with culvert and channel sizing. Cross sections of the existing pipe and outfalls, proposed stream channel and outfalls, erosion control plans, maintenance requirements, and a financial guarantee must also be provided. Ms. Rachel Villa Page 2 July 8, 2013 • This project must meet the storm water flow control requirements for new single-family residential design outlined in Appendix C of the KCSWDM. Plans, calculations, and soils testing must be provided. • A plan view showing areas of cut and fill Inzist be provided. A copy of the easement or agreement allowing this property owner to construct an access and revise the stormwater outlet on the adjacent property must be provided. PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL COMMENTS Since the application is incomplete, a full technical review of the proposal has not been conducted. However, in an initial review of the application I noted the following major technical issue that need to be addressed in order to expedite the review process. • The project site plan proposes a stream buffer reduction from the code required 50-foot minimum buffer, down to a stream buffer width ranging from approximately 5 feet to a maximum width of approximately 28 feet, resulting in an average stream buffer width of approximately 17 feet. This results in a request for an approximately 33-foot average stream buffer reduction request. • At this time, city staff does not support the requested 33-foot average buffer reduction and would not recommend approval of the request to the Hearing Examiner. • In order to gain staff support for any stream buffer reduction, the site plan should look to first avoid any environmentally critical areas, and second, minimize any impacts to environmentally critical areas and their buffers. • As proposed, the footprint of the single family residence is 4,500 square feet, which is a very large footprint. In addition, the site plan shows an additional 4,179 square feet of impervious driveway areas (8,679 imperious area on site plan, minus 4,500 square foot building footprint equals 4,179 foot impervious driveways). Both the building footprint and driveway areas are very large and result in the need to encroach into the stream setback area. • Staff suggests that the site plan be updated to reflect the minimum necessary encroachment into the stream setback area. • One of the main decision criteria city staff basis their recommendation on, and the Hearing Examiner makes his decision on is FWRC 19.165.070(3)(fl, which states the intrusion into the stream setback area, "...is necessary for reasonable development of the subject property." • As previously stated, the proposed 4,500 square foot large building footprint (which would allow an approximately 9,000 square foot two-story single-family residence) and large driveway areas both result in the need for the stream buffer reduction. The site plan should be revised to minimize any intrusions into the 50-foot stream buffer area. The proposed large size and scale of the house and driveway areas significantly exceed reasonable development. A typical new single-family residence File #13-102595-00-UP Doc. 1 D 63765 t Ms. Rachel Villa Page 3 July 8, 2013 in Federal Way is generally in the range of 2,000 to 2,700 square feet, which could be constructed with a building footprint of approximately 1,000 to 1,500 square feet. A typical 'driveway is significantly less than 4,179 square feet. * It appears that a reasonable sized residence and accompanying reasonable sized driveway and associated improvements could be constructed on the site with minimal to no intrusions into the 50 foot stream buffer area. Additional comments from city staff may result from a complete technical review of the project. Please provide six copies of any plans and four copies of any reports, in addition to the green resubmittal form. After receipt of the requested information noted in the incomplete application section of this letter, the department will notify you within 14 days whether your application is considered complete or what, if any, information is still needed. The review clock for processing your formal application will not begin until all items are submitted. Please contact me at 'irn.harri cltvoffederaIwa .corn if you have any questions. I look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Jim Harris Contract Senior Planner enc: Resubmittal Form July 3, 2013, Memo from Public Works Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Ann Dower July 3, 2013, Lakehaven Comments from Brian Asbury File 4113-102595-00-UP Doc 1 D 63765 A�k CITY 4F Federal Way COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Kim Residence Stream Setback Intrusion Process IV `Hearing Examiner Decision' Federal Way File No. 13-102595-00-UP FEDERAL WAY HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING July 27, 2015 —10:00 A.M. City Council Chambers Federal Way City Hall — 33325 81h Avenue South Report Prepared by: Jim Harris, Planner Report Date: July 20, 2015 I. PROJECT INFORMATION AND BACKGROUND Name of Project: Kim Residence Stream Setback Intrusion City File No: Process IV File 13-102595-UP Staff Recommendation: Approve with conditions Summary of Proposal: Stream setback intrusion to accommodate construction of a new single family residence and associated improvements. As part of the proposal, the applicant will be removing the stream on site from an underground culvert, creating an above ground stream channel, and requesting up to a 38-foot reduction of the 50-foot minor stream setback required by FWRC, resulting in an approximately 28-foot average width stream setback. Access to the site is from a driveway off of 2"d Avenue SW. (Exhibit C-Existing Conditions Plan, Proposed Changes Plan and Planting Plan, by Soundview Consultants dated 3/16/15.) Site Location: 29424 2"d Avenue SW, Federal Way, WA 98023: Tax Parcel ID #119600-3450 The property is located on the east side of 2A Avenue Southwest. A vicinity map is included as Exhibit B. Applicant: Chin -Sup Kim 34102 131" Place SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Applicant Agent: Soundview Consultants LLC 29017 Harborview Drive, Suite D, Gig Harbor, WA 98335 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Designations: Single -Family — High Density Residential & RS 9.6 Key Dates: ■ Master Land Use Application submitted June 12, 2013 (Exhibit A) '+ Application Determined Complete January 5, 2015 - ■ Notice of Application and Optional DNS issued January 16, 2015 (Exhibit D) • Final SEPA DNS issued February 10, 2015 (Exhibit E) • Notice of Public Hearing issued July 10, 2015 (Exhibit F) • Public Hearing date July 27, 2015 City Staff Representative: Jim Harris - Planner, 253-835-2652 II. REQUESTED DECISION The applicant is requesting a Process IV "Hearing Examiner" decision pursuant to Chapter 19.70 of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC). Proposed improvements or land surface modifications within stream Kim Residence Stream Setback Intrusion 13-102595-00-UP/nor, [.n. 69271 Process IV `Hearing Examiner Decision' Page 2 setback areas that are not essential public facilities, public utilities, public improvements or minor improvements shall be subject to Use Process IV review and stream setback intrusion criteria set forth in FWRC 19.165.070(3)(a)-(f). Pursuant to FWRC 19.70.150(2);the Hearing Examiner shall issue a decision within 10 working days following the close of the public hearing. The Use Process IV decision of the Hearing Examiner may be reviewed pursuant to Chapter 36.70C RCW in King County Superior Court per FWRC 19.70.260. III. PROJECT PROPOSAL The applicant proposes to construct a new single-family residence and associated improvements including driveways and parking pad, utilities and landscaping. The subject property is approximately 12,750 square feet in size (170' X 75'). There is an existing single-family residence on the site which will be demolished prior to construction of a new residence. There is an existing underground minor stream which runs in a north — south direction over the length of the property. Approximately three fourths of the length of the stream is presently contained in a 24-inch diameter pipe underground on the subject property. The stream is presently daylighted at the far north and south ends of the subject property. This limited open stream area on site imposes a 50-foot buffer in current conditions, which is a significantly smaller buffer area than will be with the length of the stream being daylighted on site. Portions of the stream both upstream and downstream of the subject property are located either in a pipe or above ground. Due in part to the dilapidated condition of the underground pipe and some localized drainage problems, the applicant is proposing to remove the stream from the culvert, and create an above ground stream channel and planted riparian corridor across the length of the property, except where the proposed driveway crosses the stream, the stream will still be in a piped condition. By bringing the stream above ground, a 50-foot setback / buffer from the ordinary high water mark of the minor stream is required per FWRC 19.165.010. As part of the application materials the applicant has provided the following information and plans: • Habitat Report and Stream Restoration Plan by Soundview Consultants dated June 2013 (Exhibit G) • Existing Conditions Plan, Proposed Changes Plan and Planting Plan, by Soundview Consultants dated 3/16/15 (Exhibit C) • Technical Memorandum by Soundview Consultants dated December 5, 2014 (Exhibit H) • Technical Memorandum by Soundview Consultants dated March 16, 2015 (Exhibit I) • Technical Information Report MR), by Contour Engineering LLC, dated December 2014 (Exhibit L) The analysis in the staff report and recommendation is based on: 1. Intrusions into stream setbacks — FWRC 19.165.070(3). 2. Culverts — FWRC 19.165.040. 3. Use Process IV decision criteria— FWRC 19.70.150(3). Kim Residence Stream Setback Intrusion 13-102595-00-UP/Doc, I.D. 69271 Process IV `Hearing Examiner Decision' Page 3 IV. BACKGROUND The applicant submitted a Process IV application to the City on June 12, 2013. The Process IV stream setback intrusion application was deemed complete by the City on January 5, 2015. Due to the proposed encroachments into the stream buffer, a Use Process IV application is required. Subsequent review and resubmittal of documents has included Stream Restoration Plan, design plans, drainage information and other correspondence. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing stream on site from the underground culvert, and create an above ground stream channel and planted riparian corridor across the length of the property, except where the proposed driveway will cross the stream. FWRC 19.05130 defines Minor and Major Streams as follows: "Major stream" means any stream, and the tributaries to any stream, which contains or supports, or under normal circumstances contains or supports, resident or migratory fish. If there exists a natural permanent blockage on the stream course which precludes the upstream movement of anadromous salmonid fish, then that portion of the stream which is downstream of the natural permanent blockage shall be regulated as a major stream. "Minor stream" means any stream that does not meet the definition of "major stream." Upon review of the submitted materials and the FWRC, the City has concluded the stream is Minor as identified in the City's memo dated May 27, 2015 from Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager, to Erik Earle, GIS Analyst (Exhibit J). The following improvements shown on the site plan are proposed to be located within the 50-foot stream setback area: • 5 — 10 foot wide portion of the house pad for the length of the stream buffer; ■ 10-foot-wide north -south driveway approximately 100 feet in length; ■ Portion of east -west 18-foot-wide driveway, approximately 50 feet in length; • Approximately half of the proposed 36-foot by 35-foot parking pad, north of the proposed house pad; ■ 12 — 20 foot wide landscape strip approximately 80 feet in length between north -south driveway and proposed house pad. The proposed stream buffer intrusions will result in an average stream buffer width of approximately 28 feet wide, with the narrowest area of the stream buffer being 12 feet wide. The result is a request for a stream buffer intrusion to allow a reduction up to a maximum of 38 feet in width and an average stream buffer width of 28 feet where a 50-foot buffer width is required. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The City of Federal Way issued a Notice of Application and Optional Determination of Nonsignificance (Exhibit D) for the proposed action on January 16, 2015. A final State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) (Exhibit E) was issued by the City on February 10, 2015. No Kim Residence Stream Setback Intrusion 13-102595-00-UP/Doc, I.D. 69271 Process IV `Hearing Examiner Decision' Page 4 comments or appeals of the SEPA determination were received by the City and the SEPA Determination is final. VI. COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE APPLICATION As of the date of this report, the Department has not received any written comments on the application. VII. CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS/AGENCIES & PUBLIC NOTICE The following departments, agencies, and individuals were advised of this application: 1. Development Review Committee (DRC), consisting of Community Development Department; Public Works Development Services and Traffic Divisions; Lakehaven Utility District; and South King Fire and Rescue District. DRC comments have been incorporated into this report where applicable. 2. Pursuant to Process IV notice and distribution requirements set forth in FWRC 19.70.060, all property owners within 300 feet of the site were mailed the Notice of Application (NOA) and optional Determination of Nonsignificance on January 16, 2015, and Notice of Public Hearing on July 10, 2015' The NOA with Optional DNS and Notice of Public Hearing were posted and published in the Federal Way Mirror, in accordance with the City's public notice requirements in FWRC 19.70.060(2). VIII. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SITE AND VICINITY The subject property is one tax parcel identified by the King County Assessor as #119600 3450, approximately 12,500 square feet in size, and is located along the east side of 2°d Avenue SW. The lot currently is developed with an older single-family dwelling on the subject property, along with a driveway and parking area. The remainder of the subject property is vegetated. As shown on the Existing Site Conditions Map prepared by Soundview Consultants (Exhibit C), the property grade rises from north to south, rising from an elevation of approximately 135 feet in the north end of the site, to an elevation of 154 feet at the south end of the site. The stormwater TIR (Exhibit L) states that site soils are Alderwood gravelly loam. The property is surrounded on all sides by single-family residential RS 9.6 zoning which has a 9,600 square foot minimum lot size. Land use surrounding the site is single-family residential development on generally comparable sized residential parcels. IX. STREAM SETBACK INTRUSION DECISIONAL CRITERIA The City may approve any request to locate an improvement or engage in land surface modification within stream setback areas based on the criteria in FWRC 19.165.070(3)(a)-(f). Staff has provided the following analysis of the criteria: a) It will not adversely affect water quality. Staff Response — This criterion has been met. Water quality will not be adversely affected by this proposal to reduce the required buffer width from 50 to approximately 28 feet average. In fact, a potential improvement to water quality may occur as a result of daylighting the stream corridor on the property. The above ground stream will provide potential opportunity to treat and clean Kim Residence Stream Setback Intrusion 13-102595-00-UP/Doc. I.D. 69271 Process IV `Hearing Examiner Decision' Page 5 water runoff in the creek, where there is no water treatment currently in the existing underground pipe. During construction related to the house, driveway and creek corridor, the applicant will be required to implement a temporary erosion and sediment control plan to be reviewed and approved by the City. After construction, the applicant will be required to stabilize and replant any disturbed areas. The riparian corridor will be planted as part of the proposal, and the reduction of stream buffer width requested should not adversely affect water quality, as there is minimal to no water quality treatment on the site currently. b) It will not adversely affect the existing quality of wildlife habitat within the stream or setback area. Staff Response — This criterion has been met. Wildlife habitat will not be adversely affected by this proposal to reduce the required buffer width from 50 to approximately 28 feet average width. Improvement to wildlife habitat should occur as a result of daylighting the stream corridor on the property. The above ground stream will provide potential wildlife habitat opportunity in the planted riparian corridor, compared to the current piped condition of the stream which provides no wildlife habitat. City staff recommends a condition of approval to require design and implementation of a final stream restoration plan by a Certified Ecologist, as mitigation for the proposal and associated stream buffer reduction. The stream restoration plan shall include provisions for environmental goals and objectives, performance standards, detailed construction plans, timing, monitoring for five years, contingency plan, and a financial guarantee of construction, maintenance and monitoring at the applicant's expense. c) It will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention capabilities. Staff Response — This criterion has been met. Drainage and -stormwater conditions will not be adversely affected by this proposal to reduce the required buffer width from 50 to approximately 28 feet average width. A potential improvement to drainage and stormwater should occur as a result of daylighting the stream corridor on the property. The open stream channel will provide improved drainage capabilities, increase conveyance capacity, and mitigate or resolve existing flooding issues identified in the applicant's June 2013 Habitat and Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan, by Soundview Consultants (Exhibit G). Development of this site with approval of the requested stream setback reduction will have no more drainage impacts than development without the stream setback reduction. All proposed improvements must meet applicable regulations in the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and be reviewed and approved by the City. d) It will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards. Staff Response — This criterion has been met. Erosion and unstable earth conditions will not be created by this proposal to reduce the required buffer width from 50 to approximately 28 feet average width. To minimize erosion, the developer has proposed to convey runoff from downspouts to an on -site dispersion system. A Stormfilter is proposed to treat driveway runoff before it enters the stream, and amended soils are proposed for all disturbed areas on the site to help detain and filter stormwater runoff. Native plant materials are proposed for the stream bank to help stabilize the newly created slopes. Kim Residence Stream Setback Intrusion 13-102595-00-UP/Doc I.D. 69271 Process IV `Hearing Examiner Decision' Page 6 An engineered design for Erosion and Sedimentation Control (ESC) must be provided to the City as part of the building plans. The ESC measures and long term riparian corridor planting should mitigate the potential for erosion. e) It will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area of the subject property nor to the City as a whole, including the loss of significant open space. Staff Response — Given the existing developed nature of the subject property and surrounding area, the granting of this stream buffer reduction will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area of the subject property nor to the City as a whole, including the loss of significant open space. The site is in a developed residential neighborhood. Daylighting the stream is a benefit to the neighborhood and surrounding environment, as it will provide wildlife habitat, stormwater treatment and reduce drainage problems. The adjoining property to the west was granted a similar stream buffer reduction by the Federal Way Hearing Examiner in 1991 (Exhibit J). The stream buffer reduction request for the adjoining property to the north was approved by the Federal Way Hearing Examiner on December 12, 1991, and reduced the required stream setback for a new residence from 50 to 20 feet. The proposed property development is subject to all applicable development codes, which will mitigate potential impacts. In addition, the action of daylighting the stream may provide some nominal environmental benefit in regard to stormwater and wildlife habitat. f) It is necessary for reasonable development of the subject property. Staff Response — As part of the proposed development of a new single-family residence at the site, the applicant has proposed to remove the existing stream from the culvert, and construct an above ground stream course. Currently under existing conditions with the stream piped underground, less area of the subject property is encumbered by the stream buffer than area that will be regulated as stream buffer following removal of the stream from the culvert. Creating a better overall environmental condition by taking the stream out of the pipe and creating a riparian corridor, should not result in penalizing the property owner by creating additional regulated stream buffer on the property. Therefore, City staff supports the requested stream buffer reduction request as shown on the site plan, in order to construct a new single- family residence with a footprint of up to 2,853 square feet in size, along with driveway areas and improvements as shown on the proposed site plan. The applicant has noted in their March 16, 2015 technical memo, that the owner has parking needs for a work van in addition to at least one family car. The applicant further cites garage access to the main floor of the house is needed for extended family care. Without approval of the requested stream buffer reduction, the applicant would be forced to construct a single-family residence with a smaller footprint and smaller driveway area than proposed. The requested stream buffer reduction is necessary for reasonable development of the property comparable to surrounding properties. As a -recommended condition of approval, staff recommends the proposed new house be limited in total size to 3,873 square feet as this is the average of nearby homes according to the applicant's March 16, 2015 Technical Memo by Soundview Consultants (Exhibit I). Granting approval to construct a larger house than the surrounding average house size would potentially be a grant of special privilege. Kim Residence Stream Setback Intrusion 13-102595-00-UP/Doc. I.D. 69271 Process IV `Hearing Examiner Decision' Page 7 X. CULVERT A STREAM In order to provide vehicle access to the proposed new residence, the applicant has proposed to culvert that portion of the stream where the proposed driveway crosses the stream. Pursuant to FWRC 19.165.040, culverts are permitted in streams only if approved under this section and must be reviewed by Process III. However, pursuant to FWRC 19.65.010 if the development, activity, or use that requires approval through Process III is part of a proposal that also requires approval through Process IV, the entire proposal will be decided upon using Process IV, if the director determines that this will result in more efficient decision making. Therefore, the culvert component of the proposal is also being reviewed and decided upon under this Process IV application and review. Stream Culvert Criteria — The applicant must also meet decisional criteria pursuant to FWRC 19.165.040(3). Staff has provided the following analysis of FWRC 19.165.040(3). The city will allow a stream to be put in a culvert only if: a. No significant habitat area will be destroyed; Staff Response — This criterion has been met. See staff responses under section IX above. No significant habitat area will be destroyed by implementing a culvert to allow vehicle access at the site. The overall proposal will result in the creation of additional wildlife habitat area. b. It is necessary for some reasonable use of the subject property. Convenience to the applicant in order to facilitate general site design will not be considered. The applicant must demonstrate, by submitting alternative site plans showing the stream in an open condition, that no other reasonable site design exists. Staff Response — This criterion has been met. As the stream runs the length of the subject property, and all of the developable area of the property is located on the far side of the property away from where vehicular access is provided from 2°a Avenue SW, crossing the stream is necessary to reach the developable area of the site. Without crossing the stream, the developable portion of the property would essentially be landlocked. Therefore, crossing the stream in one location is necessary for reasonable development of the site. XI. PROCESS IV DECISIONAL CRITERIA Process IV Decisional Criteria — The applicant must also meet decisional criteria pursuant to FWRC 19.70.150(3)(A)-(F). Staff has provided the following analysis of Process IV criteria: a) It is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff Response — This criterion has been met. The comprehensive plan is used, among other documents, as a basis for implementing regulations such as zoning and critical areas requirements. The Process IV request was reviewed and determined to be consistent with the following policies contained in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan: Kim Residence Stream Setback Intrusion 13-102595-00-UP/Doe f D.69271 Process IV `Hearing Examiner Decision' Page 8 a) NEP1— Protect and restore environmental quality through land use plans, surface water management plans and programs, comprehensive park plans, and development review. Staff. Response — The proposed stream setback intrusion has been reviewed under applicable regulations set forth in Chapter 19 Zoning and Development Code and Chapter 16 Surface Water Management. The applicant proposes an overall upgrade to environmental conditions by daylighting the stream. Creating the stream channel and riparian corridor should result in upgraded habitat conditions, stormwater quality, and stormwater drainage features. Final site stabilization, planting the riparian corridor and monitoring of the stream channel creation and planting will be required. b) NEP 33 — The City will seek to retain native vegetation within riparian corridors. New planting of vegetation with the approval from the City may be required where such revegetation will enhance the corridor's function. Consideration should be given to the removal of non-native invasive species. Staff Response — The proposal will result in and create a planted riparian corridor, where the stream currently exists in an underground pipe. Final site stabilization methods, and riparian corridor planting, will also be required. c) NEP37 — Erosion control measures shall be used for any work in or adjacent to stream buffers. Staff Response — The applicant will be required to implement Public Works Department approved temporary and long-term erosion and sedimentation control measures. The applicant will be required to detail the method that will be utilized on the construction drawings as part of the engineering review and will be checked onsite during construction by City inspectors. b) It is consistent with all applicable provisions of this title and all other applicable laws. Staff Response — This criterion has been met. The Process IV request has been reviewed under the FWCP; all applicable provisions of FWRC including Chapter 16, "Surface Water Management," and Chapter 19, "Zoning and Development Code;" and is consistent with all applicable provisions and laws. The construction permit plans for the driveway construction and home construction will be reviewed utilizing the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and Public Works Department standards. Per FWRC 19.165.080 (Additional requirements for land surface modification), for land surface modification within the stream setback area, the applicant shall comply with the following additional requirements: (1) All fill material used must be nondissolving and nondecomposing. The fill material must not contain organic or inorganic material that would be detrimental to water quality or the existing habitat. (2) The applicant may deposit dredge spoils on the subject property only if part of an approved development on the subject property. (3) The applicant shall stabilize all areas left exposed after land surface modification with native vegetation normally associated with the stream or setback area. A recommended condition of approval shall require compliance with FWRC 19.165.080. c) It is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Kim Residence Stream Setback Intrusion 13-102595-00-UP/Doc I.D. 69271 Process IV `Hearing Examiner Decision' Page 9 Staff Response — This criterion has been met. The proposed stream setback intrusion is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. The proposal will provide adequate and safe vehicular access for a new single-family residence. The proposal will result in an upgraded environmental condition by daylighting the stream from the existing condition. The stream restoration plan will be designed by a licensed engineer and environmental biologist. With the recommended conditions of approval, and the five-year monitoring, no adverse impacts to the stream or buffer area are anticipated. Construction permit plans for the stream restoration and stormwater management will be reviewed utilizing the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual, Public Works Department standards, and Best Management Practices. d) The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal. Staff Response — This criterion has been met. No significant adverse transportation impacts were identified by the Public Works Department Traffic Division. The proposed action is for construction of one new single-family residence in approximately the same location of the existing residence. The proposal will not generate any additional transportation impacts. The subject property will have one access to 2nd Avenue SW and the access location will be reviewed for compliance with applicable Federal Way standards in conjunction with building permit application and review. The subject property will be served by sanitary sewer and public water systems from Lakehaven Utility District, which has facilities in the area as identified in the Lakehaven Utility District memo dated July 3, 2013 (Exhibit K). e) The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration for access. Staff Response — This criterion has been met. The proposed stream buffer reduction does not create vehicular impacts. The proposed driveway is at the same general location as the existing driveway serving the site. The driveway access will be reviewed for compliance with applicable City of Federal Way standards in conjunction with building permit application and review. f) Traffic safety impacts for all modes of transportation, both on and off site, are adequately mitigated. Staff Response — This criterion has been met. The proposed stream buffer reduction does not create transportation safety impacts on or off site. The driveway access will be reviewed for compliance with applicable City of Federal Way standards in conjunction with building permit application and review. X1I. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis in this report the department recommends approval of the stream setback intrusion subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with FWRC 19.165.080 (Additional requirements for land surface modification) in all future permit documents and site construction associated with the driveway project. Kim Residence Stream Setback Intrusion 13-102595-00-UP/Doc i.o. 69271 Process IV `Hearing Examiner Decision' Page 10 a. All fill material used must be nondissolving and nondecomposing. The fill material must not contain organic or inorganic material that would be detrimental to water quality or the existing habitat. b. The applicant may deposit dredge spoils on the subject property only if part of an approved development on the subject property. c. The applicant shall stabilize all areas left exposed after land surface modification with native vegetation normally associated with the stream or setback area. The applicant shall submit a planting plan for review and approval. The applicant shall submit engineering plans for review and approval, including erosion control, grading, and cross sections of the stream. The applicant shall include meanders, pools, weirs, and/or other measures to slow the stream velocity and create habitat. d. The applicant shall provide a bond for 120% of the estimated cost of constructing and planting the stream channel. 2. The proposed new house shall be limited in total size to 3,873 square feet as this is the average of nearby homes according to the applicant's March 16, 2015 Technical Memo by Soundview Consultants. Granting approval to construct a larger house than the surrounding average house size would potentially be a grant of special privilege. 3. The applicant shall provide to the City a final stream restoration plan prepared by a Certified Ecologist, to be approved by the Public Works and Community Development Departments prior to issuance of a building permit for a new single-family residence. The plan shall be implemented prior to Certificate of Occupancy of the new single-family residence. The final stream restoration plan shall include at a minimum the following elements: • environmental goals and objectives; • performance standards; • detailed construction plans; ■ timing; • monitoring for five years; ■ contingency plan; • and, a financial guarantee of construction, maintenance, and monitoring at the applicant's expense. XIII. MISCELLANEOUS If this request is approved by the Hearing Examiner, it does not authorize the applicant to begin clearing, grading and paving. The applicant will be required to obtain Public Works Department engineering approval of the vehicle access easement pursuant to FWRC 19.135.130. If approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant must substantially complete construction within five years after the final decision of the City on the matter, or the decision becomes void pursuant to FWRC 19.15.100(2) XW. LIST OF EXHIBITS Copies of the Exhibits listed below are not attached to all copies of this report. All Exhibits have been provided to the Hearing Examiner. Copies of Exhibits may be obtained upon request at the City of Federal Way Community Development Department. Kim Residence Stream Setback Intrusion 13-102595-00-UP/Doc. i D. 69271 Process IV `Hearing Examiner Decision' Page 11 Exhibit A Master Land Use Application Exhibit B Vicinity Map Exhibit C Existing Conditions Plan, Proposed Changes Plan and Planting Plan, by Soundview Consultants dated 3/16/15 Exhibit D Notice of Application and Optional DNS Exhibit E Final Determination of Nonsignificance Exhibit F Environmental Checklist dated 6/12/13 Exhibit G Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan, by Soundview Consultants June 2013 Exhibit H Soundview Consultants Technical Memo dated 12/5/14 Exhibit I Soundview Consultants Technical Memo dated 3/16/15 Exhibit J City of Federal Way Memo from Isaac Conlen to Erik Earle dated 5/27/15 (with attachments) Exhibit K Lakehaven Utility District Memo dated 7/3/13 Exhibit L Technical Information Report (TIR), Contour Engineering LLC, December 2014 TRANSMITTED TO THE FOLLOWING: Hearing Examiner — Phil Olbrechts Applicant — Chin Sup Kim, 34102 131h Place SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Applicant Agent — Rachel Villa, Soundview Consultants, 2907 Harborview Drive, Suite D, Gig Harbor, WA 98335 City of Federal Way Staff — Jim Harris, Isaac Conlen, Ann Dower, and Mark Orthmann Kim Residence Stream Setback Intrusion 13-102595-00-UP/Doc. I.D. 69271 Process IV `Hearing Examiner Decision' Page 12 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A�k 38th Avenue South Federall Way WA 98003-6325 CITY OF 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 Federal Way www.cilyoffederalwoy.corn DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, ��(��-,2 !?� hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ■ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or 5 posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2014, Project Name File Number(s) ' - t)P Signature Date K:\PLANNING INTERN\Declaration of Distrbulion notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc Posting Sites: Federal Way City Hall - 33325 8th Avenue Federal Way Regional Library - 34200 1 st Way South Federal Way 320th Branch Library - 848 South 320th Street Subject Site - K:\PLANNING INTERN\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc 1%11111� CIT Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.--itvoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION l hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Pelmit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was Amailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2015. Project Name rr S► File Number(s) 1 -/D r) 5 SignatureK Date-7— S /�� K:\CD Administrolion Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /8/2015 10:07:00 AM City of Federal Way 119600-1300 G1) � Q 'Q 119600-1310 119600- 3905 300' Parcel �-trA Notification area 6/26/2013 city of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S. P.0 Box 9718 Federal Way Wa 96063 (206) - 835 - 7000 www.cityoffederalway com 0945 119600--0905 00"Q 119600-1045 g600 1-015 - i 119600- 119600-' Z 1305 1 1350 N 119600- 119600-1165 119600- 119600-1355 1173 1145 119600- 119600- 1315 1360 119600- 119600-1255 119600-1 1285 119600-1240 119600-1365 119600-3428 119600-3407 119600-3411 (1) 119600-3420 119600-3410 119600-3265 119600-3780 119600-3800 .a 119600-3438 119600-3412 Z ' �119600-3425 N 1 119600-3450 119600-3431 119600-3426 119600-3590 119600- 3760 { 119600-3597 119600-3740' 1 119600-3585 119600-3600 1 38 6 00 119600-3720 1 119600-3595 136100 720531/720531- 513720- 0110 0200 0100 513720- 720531-00901 0190 r 513720= `/ ��51 720531-0080 0180 J . 51, N 513730- 513730- 062104- 0140 0130 9089 513730- �+ 0120 062104- 0-a120 0-0110 513730-0110 9093 Legend rliv OF King County Tax Parcels Scale: Federal Way Subject Property N 0 50 100 Feet L f lI This map is inlended for use as a graphical representatlon only. Notified Properties The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its a cufa cy. 0 rn 00 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N M M M N N N N O O O N O N O N O W N N N 01 N N O 0 0 CDO O O N O O 0 0 O CD CD CD 0 0 N CD O CD m 00 00 00 00 00 00 Vl 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 N 00 00 00 ON 00 O� O� O� O� 01 O� 01 01 01 O� O� O� O� 01 O, 011 00 krl N ¢ a a¢¢¢ a 00 a¢ *k 3°`333333>33°�33333w333v3�00 �-�z ¢3¢¢¢¢¢¢2¢¢° ¢¢¢¢QwQ¢¢�QQ� Wo �o w wwwwwWP�wwHwwwww�wWW�W�-� W w o Q Q Q Q Q Q A w Q Q W Q Q Q Q Q p Q Q Q Q Q W W zW Q Q L. — �J E-� U w N w - n UcncacnHv) cn Gn3 ��U ww 3 3 Z wwoww wwv,wwwwwa www�zQ v� Ex H Q d o> Q x>¢>¢> a 3 Q d N > x a Pa c o�, �•, rn A N F� H E" q oho H g A H A A A> N¢ oho A A Q o w N N z cn z °. ° v� z z z z z z z w x o O p o �' M M �o l� N 00 �p z O N O Q O O Vl O LOO o �o Cl) m kn � 'ITN Q Vn �n �D V� V"1 p M [� W) ON O� O� O\ O C 0 G o c; a E ° .� M 0 H a o .o W ¢ E� L m Z_ V M J o tN Z CL x�! Q ¢ a a¢ o� a w� cv z ¢ �q x N a w cn c7 A a ww ,>. z o o Gn H > x¢ A o o z + as 3 + F U U x W U Z x �WW H d W j AW z w U w¢¢ z�z ¢ o w p a4 zx3 WC7 �AaA`a" WAa GHwwGUwz xZ 0 W > 000z } x�v Z zvU �EH" uzzzvW � � O w� op wuzw o o z A o n vw UpO) a07� v) a ¢zzPQ4 >�� H 0 O J O -,I-'n CDO O I'D to O �o kn o0 CD O lD 01 O -D CD O \.O O, Wn .O m CD O 110 01 Wn �o N M O Cl �o O, [� CD�--' T M Cl O \D O, O_ m CD O �o 01 -- M CD O 1�0 O, N_ M CD O 110 OS CD N" � M O O 110 O, W) It M O O I'D O, �o N � M O O �10 01 00 NM �t M O O O, �--� M O O �D 01 oo K1 � M O O �o a, � 00 kn M CD O 110 O., O C� W) M O O %O O, vl ON kn M CD O I'D 01 ['- Q, W) M CD O �o O', O O �O M CD O �o 01 O_ �o M O O 110 O� a) N t M CD O 110 01 CD [- M O O �o O, O \o [- M O O ID 01 O 00 l- M O O \o 01 O — 00 M O O \D 01 U) (o I� M M O N M LO 0 ti w M O N N N N M N "t 04 LO N Co N I� N 0 cu d CITY OF A. Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE PUBLIC HEARING Kim Residence Stream Setback Intrusion, File 13-102595-00-UP Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing on Monday, July 27, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., in Federal Way City Hall Council Chambers (33325 8`h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA). Project: Process IV— Hearing Examiner approval pursuant to FWRC 19.165.070(3), for a stream setback intrusion to accommodate construction of a new single family residence and associated improvements. As part of the proposal, the applicant will be removing the stream on site from an underground culvert, creating an above ground stream channel, and requesting up to a 38-foot reduction of the 50-foot minor stream setback required by FWRC, resulting in an approximately 28-foot average width stream setback. Access to the site is from a driveway off of 2°d Avenue SW. Location: 29424 2nd Avenue SW, Federal Way, WA 98023: Tax Parcel ID #119600-3450 Applicant: Chin -Sup Kim Applicant Agent: Soundview Consultants LLC City Contact: Jim Harris, Planner, jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com, 253-835-2652 Application Received., June 12, 2013 Application Determined Complete: January 5, 2015 Notice of Application and Optional DNS Issued: January 16, 2015 Final SEPA DNS Issued: February 10, 2015 Requested Decision and Other Permits Included with this Application: Use Process IV (File 13-102595-UP); State Environmental Policy Act Review (SEPA) (File 13-102596-SE). Existing Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan for Kim Residence by Soundview Consultants LLC, dated June 2013; Storm Water Technical Information Report by Contour Engineering LLC, dated December 2014; and Environmental Checklist. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 14, "Environmental Policy;" Chapter 16, "Surface Water Management" and Chapter 19, "Zoning and Development Code" A final State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Determination of Nonsignificance was issued for the proposal on February 10, 2015, pursuant to WAC 197-11-355. Pursuant to FWRC 19.70, "Process IV — Hearing Examiner," the Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing on the Use Process IV application and will issue a written decision on the application within 10 working days after the close of the hearing. Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner, either by delivering comments to the Community Development Department before the hearing, by giving them directly to the Hearing Examiner at the hearing, or by appearing at the hearing and presenting oral public testimony. Any person may request a copy of the decision once made. Written comments may be mailed to the Community Development Department, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Please reference the file number (File #13-102595-UP) when presenting written testimony. This application is to be reviewed under all applicable codes, regulations, and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official files are available for review at Federal Way City Hall during working hours in the Community Development Department. A staff report to the Hearing Examiner will be available for review one week before the hearing. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on July 10, 2015. Doc ID 69270 VICINITY MAP 29424 2nd Ave SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 294TV sr - f j i Subject Site w - �_ � •g;r3ATH�'L � i r 1 I ? ' ll r '. , N This map displays the surrounding area of the Kim Process IV Stream Buffer W+ Intrusion Request located at 29424 2nd Ave 5W in Federal Way, WA. This map E - was created- July 6, 2015. S Doc ID 69270 4� CIT Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cifyoffederalwoY.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Y P tY P J rY Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ,'fie -mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on g 2015. Project Name~."[ ems. o File Number(s) ) 3- )o.D S 9 S. Signature Date 7 -S-/,,S" K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /8/2015 10:07:00 AM Tamara Fix From: Jennifer Anderson <jnderson@fedwaymirror.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 9:04 AM To: Tamara Fix Subject: Re: Kim Hearing - Legal Notice Got it, thanks! Jennifer Anderson Advertising Sales Consultant Office: 253-925-5565, Ext 3056 Internal: 02-3056 Fax: 253-925-5750 31919 1 st Ave S, Ste 101, Federal Way, WA 98003 2= Sound Publishing, Inc. Map Print Rates Online Rates Media Kit, Sound Info On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Tamara Fix<Tarnara.Fix0,cityoffederalway.com> wrote: Please publish the following legal notice (Kim Intrusion Hearing, 13-102595) in Friday's (July 10, 2015) issue. Please confirm and issue an affidavit of publication. Thank you. CITY 01 Z. Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE PUBLIC HEARING Kim Residence Stream Setback Intrusion, File 13-102595-00-UP 1 Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing on Monday, July 27, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., in Federal Way City Hall Council Chambers (33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA). Project: Process IV— Hearing Examiner approval pursuant to FWRC 19.165.070(3), for a stream setback intrusion to accommodate construction of a new single family residence and associated improvements. As part of the proposal, the applicant will be removing the stream on site from an underground culvert, creating an above ground stream channel, and requesting up to a 38-foot reduction of the 50-foot minor stream setback required by FWRC, resulting in an approximately 28-foot average width stream setback. Access to the site is from a driveway off of 2"d Avenue SW. Location: 29424 2"d Avenue SW, Federal Way, WA 98023: Tax Parcel ID #119600-3450 Applicant: Chin -Sup Kim Applicant Agent: Soundview Consultants LLC City Contact: Jim Harris, Planner,iim.liarris(t4citvoffederalway.cam, 253-835-2652 Application Received: Application Determined Complete: Notice of Application and Optional DNS Issued: Final SEPA DNS Issued: June 12, 2013 January 5, 2015 January 16, 2015 February 10, 2015 Requested Decision and Other Permits Included with this Application: Use Process IV (File 13-102595-UP); State Environmental Policy Act Review (SEPA) (File 13-102596-SE). Existing Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan for Kim Residence by Soundview Consultants LLC, dated June 2013; Storm Water Technical Information Report by Contour Engineering LLC, dated December 2014; and Environmental Checklist. �1 Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 14, "Environmental Policy;" Chapter 16, "Surface Water Management" and Chapter 19, "Zoning and Development Code" A final State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Determination of Nonsignificance was issued for the proposal on February 10, 2015, pursuant to WAC 197-11-355. Pursuant to FWRC 19.70, "Process IV — Hearing Examiner," the Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing on the Use Process IV application and will issue a written decision on the application within 10 working days after the close of the hearing. Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner, either by delivering comments to the Community Development Department before the hearing, by giving them directly to the Hearing Examiner at the hearing, or by appearing at the hearing and presenting oral public testimony. Any person may request a copy of the decision once made. Written comments may be mailed to the Community Development Department, 33325 8`h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Please reference the file number (File #13-102595-UP) when presenting written testimony. This application is to be reviewed under all applicable codes, regulations, and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official files are available for review at Federal Way City Hall during working hours in the Community Development Department. A staff report to the Hearing Examiner will be available for review one week before the hearing. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on July 10, 2015. Tamara Fix Administrative Assistant federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2602 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com CITY OF Federal Way FILE: NOTICE OFLAND USE PUBLIC HEA RING Kim Residence Stream Setback Intrusion, File 13-102595-00-UP Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing on Monday, July 27, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., in Federal Way City Hall Council Chambers (33325 8a' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA). Project: Process IV— Hearing Examiner approval pursuant to FWRC 19.165.070(3), for a stream setback intrusion to accommodate construction of a new single family residence and associated improvements. As part of the proposal, the applicant will be removing the stream on site from an underground culvert, creating an above ground stream channel, and requesting up to a 38-foot reduction of the 50-foot minor stream setback required by FWRC, resulting in an approximately 28-foot average width stream setback. Access to the site is from a driveway off of 2nd Avenue SW. Location: 29424 2nd Avenue SW, Federal Way, WA 98023: Tax Parcel ID #119600-3450 Applicant: Chin -Sup Kim Applicant Agent: Soundview Consultants LLC City Contact: Jim Harris, Planner, jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com, 253-835-2652 Application Received: June 12, 2013 Application Determined Complete: January 5, 2015 Notice of Application and Optional DNS Issued: January 16, 2015 Final SEPA DNS Issued. February 10, 2015 Requested Decision and Other Permits Included with this Application: Use Process IV (File 13-102595-UP); State Environmental Policy Act Review (SEPA) (File 13-102596-SE). Existing Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan for Kim Residence by Soundview Consultants LLC, dated June 2013; Storm Water Technical Information Report by Contour Engineering LLC, dated December 2014; and Environmental Checklist. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 14, "Environmental Policy;" Chapter 16, `.`Surface Water Management" and Chapter 19, "Zoning and Development Code" A final State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Determination of Nonsignificance was issued for the proposal on February 10, 2015, pursuant to WAC 197-11-355. Pursuant to FWRC 19.70, "Process IV — Hearing Examiner," the Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing on the Use Process IV application and will issue a written decision on the application within 10 working days after the close of the hearing. Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner, either by delivering comments to the Community Development Department before the hearing, by giving them directly to the Hearing Examiner at the hearing, or by appearing at the hearing and presenting oral public testimony. Any person may request a copy of the decision once made. Written comments may be mailed to the Community Development Department, 33325 8`h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Please reference the file number (File #13-102595-UP) when presenting written testimony. This application is to be reviewed under all applicable codes, regulations, and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official files are available for review at Federal Way City Hall during working hours in the Community Development Department. A staff report to the Hearing Examiner will be available for review one week before the hearing. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on July 10, 2015. Doc ID 69270 VICINITY MAP 29424 2" d Ave SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 I SW 294T sr i w j Subject Site 50 N This map displays the surrounding area of the Kim Process IV Stream Buffer Intrusion Request located at 29424 2nd Ave SW in Federal Way, WA. This map W E was created July 6, 2015. S Doc 1D 69270 .�'L�unc�cri�c� �C►rz.�.ul.�cz.y?tS R Environmental, Natural Resource, and Land Use Consulting Comprehensive :Assessment, Planning, and Permitting Senzces 2907 Harborview Drive Gig Harbor, WA 98335 Phone: 253.514.8952 Fax: 253.514.8954 Technical Memorandum To: Isaac Conlen, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way File Number: 1101.0001 From: Racheal Villa, Soundview Consultants LLC Date: March 16, 2015 Re: Kim Residential Redevelopment: Planning Division Technical Review Comments Application File #13-102595-00-UP and 13-102596-00-SE Dear Isaac, Soundview Consultants LLC was hired by Chita. Sup Kim (Applicant) to assist with land use permitting for a new single family residence over an area that contains existing single-family residence and associate infrastructure. The project is located at 29424 Td Avenue Southwest in Federal Way, Washington and is comprised of one tax parcel (Parcel Number 1196003450) in the Northeast '/a of Section 06 in Township 21 North, Range 04 East W.M. in Ding County. The project proposes the construction and redevelopment of a single-family residence. In addition, the project proposes the removal and replacement of a 100-foot length of culvert that is in a state of disrepair with stream channel and stream buffer restoration and enhancement actions in order to improve existing site conditions. The single-family residential portion of the project necessitates intrusion into a 50-foot stream buffer area chat would not exist but for the stream channel and stream buffer restoration and enhancement actions. The City of Federal Way (City) reviewed the request and provided comments on February 5, 2015. The comments made by the City of Federal Way are addressed within this Technical Memorandum and the accompanying site plans. Genetal Response to Technical Comments The intent and overall project design are the same as the proposed project plan dated December 3, 2014. As you know, the project site plan proposes a stream channel and stream buffer restoration and enhancement action to improve site conditions during the residential redevelopment. After recent discussions with the Applicant and the Project Engineer an updated site plan is being submitted to incorporate the required drawing updates identified per the February 5, 2014 City letter. In addition, the north -south driveway is a maximum of 10-feet wide as an item recognized as acceptable per the City letter. The revised site plan includes a 1,134 square foot restored stream channel and a 7,574 square foot stream buffet creation and restoration area. The widths proposed in the restored and enhanced stream buffer area range from 12 feet to 50 feet as shown in the 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC City of Federal Way Response 1 March 16, 2015 attached site plan. An average stream buffer width of approximately 28 feet will be located over the eastern portions of restored and enhanced stream channel including approximately 100 linear feet of channel that is currently contained within a 12-inch metal culvert and has no buffer. In addition, an error in the calculation of proposed average buffer width appears to have been made in the February 5, 2014 City letter. According to the City's description, the average buffer width of approximately 17 feet; however, this dimension appears to have excluded the area identified as existing stream buffer area; which is proposed to be enhanced, in the southern extent of the on -site stream channel. However, the revised site plan provides additional dimensions on the plans per the City letter and will better demonstrate the intent of this area to be included as enhanced stream buffer area. Further, City staff asserts that the sizes of the proposed 2,853 square foot residence and associated infrastructure result in the need to encroach into the stream setback area. The proposed size of the residence and associated garage area with access provided for extended family care uses is similar in footprint to several of the residential structures in the immediate vicinity of the proposed residence. The proposed project does not request a special privilege not enjoyed by other properties in the area. Please see Table 1 below for examples of single family residential in the area. Table 1. Summary of Approximate Single -Family Residences Approximate Single -Family Neighboring Parcels with Direction from Subject Residence Size Single -Family Residences Property (square feet) 1196001255 North 3,350 1196003420 North 3,760 1196003438 East 3,928 1196003740 Southwest 4,110 1196003760 Southwest 3,690 1196003780 Southwest 3,680 1196001315 Northwest 3,610 1196001305 Northwest 4,900 Average: 3,878 In addition, following the proposed stream channel and stream buffer restoration and enhancement actions, a 50-foot offset line from the stream channel will encumber approximately 2/3 of the property. Existing site ingress/egress crosses the stream channel and, therefore, any driveway area requires intrusion into a portion of the stream channel and buffer. The Applicant also requires parking for a work van and parking for at least one family car. In addition, residential access associated with the garage is necessary on the main floor of the residence due to extended family care needs. Therefore, the proposed project provides the minimum necessary intrusion into the buffer proposed restored and enhanced stream buffer area. 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC City of Federal Way Response 2 March 16, 2015 Comment 1— Site Plans My previous correspondence noted that the site plans need to clearly demark the Federal Way Revised Code required 50 foot stream setback. line. The December 3, 2014 site plant does not ident the 50 foot sireann setbac,� line and must be revised according +. In a couple spots on the site plan, label the proposed distance from the .stremn to the proposed driveway. Label dimensions of the driveway on the site plan. Response: The 50-foot stream setback line, proposed distance from the stream to the driveway, and the dimensions of the driveway are provided on the attached revised drawings. Comment 2 — Project Alternatives In a December 11, 2013 email, City staff previously informed you of two potential alternatives that we would support moving forward to the Hearing Examiner for the Process IV stream setback intrusion. The December 3, 2014 site plan does not implement either of the alternatives identified in my December 11, 2013 email. City staff identified we would provide a favorable rrcornmendation to the Hearing Examiner for one of the two followir�g alternatives, A and B, discussed below. At this time, in order to gain staff support for the Process IV stream setback intrusion, you can revise the plans to meet one of the alternatives discussed in my December 11, 2013 email (identified below), or a third party alternative would be foryou to request City staff to proceed to the Hearing Examiner withyour December 3, 2014 site plan. Alternative. B. Implement a site plan including a north south driveway parallel and adjacent to the house pad, wtlh a rnaxlmrtrn driveway width of 10 feet, and the driveway in the stream buffer area would need to be of a Grasserete or similar lore impact material, meeting acceptable engineering design standards. Response: The December 11, 2013 email provided two options (Alternatives A and B) that would be acceptable to City staff. The current proposal included here within most closely aligns with Alternative B with the exception that due to the slope of the site, the north -south driveway will not be a suitable location for grasscrete or other pervious pavement options (per Adam Barnett at Contour, pers comm. 2015). The main driveway and parking area is at 136 feet in elevation and the north -south driveway extends approximately eighty (80) iinear feet along the front of the residence where it rises approximately nine feet in elevation to 145 feet in elevation. According to the Project Engineer, the use of pervious pavement in this area would not be suitable or appropriate due to the slope from the lower parking area to the main floor of the residence. Therefore, the project as proposed meets acceptable engineering designs and proposes the minimum necessary intrusion into the restored stream buffer area. Comment3—Burden ofProof The border: of pmof is on the applicant to show Boni the proposal meets the appdicabk Federal Wray Code criteria. I suggest thatyou further address (bind the response in page 10 of the Join 2013 Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan) FWRC 19.165.070(3)(fj, which states. `Tt (stream setback intrusion) is necessary for reasonable development of the subject properly. " 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC City of Federal Way Response 3 March 16, 2015 Response: The existing single-family residential structure and stream channel configuration are in need of improvements. Current site conditions include a residential structure that will not meet the needs of the land owner for occupancy; further, the existing drainage feature flows across the majority of the site through approximately 100 feet of 12-inch metal culvert that was identified in 2013 as being in need of repair or replacement. The drainage currently flows through open channel for a total of approximately 68 linear feet at the north and south ends of the property. Both areas of open channel are surrounded by mostly ornamental or non-native invasive plant species and the associated buffer functions are limited. The project proposes to improve both the residential structure to meet suitable occupancy needs and improve the existing site access for safety and site use. In addition, the project proposes to improve environmental functions and processes through improving 1,134 square feet of drainage channel and 7,574 square feet of improved stream buffer functions to benefit the property and as well as the adjacent and downstream properties. The new driveway and garage on the north end of the single-family residence are proposed to meet the occupational needs of the land owner which require regular parking for an electrician's van. In addition, residential accessibility is necessary to the main floor of the residence (approximately nine feet upslope of the north driveway) in order to allow extended family to safely access the residence. In addition, the proposed plan provides an improvement over simple repair or replacement of the culvert, as should be allowable by the City. Minimum efforts would leave the stream channel in its existing 12-inch culverted configuration and not provide any stream channel nor stream buffer enhancements. However, the proposed project attempts to provide a better quality stream channel, improved natural vegetation community, and enhance site drainage capabilities to alleviate any potential on -site flooding during high precipitation or high flow storm events. The project proposes stream buffer restoration to mitigate for proposed project actions. In order to gain City staff support, the site plan avoids and minimizes impacts to environmentally critical areas and associated buffers to the maximum extent possible. The proposed residence and infrastructure are located as close to the eastern portion of the subject property, opposite the stream channel, as much as possible to avoid and minimize impacts to the existing stream channel. In addition, the Applicant has gone through great expense and effort in order to legally possess the area between 2"d Avenue Southwest and the proposed residence, prior City Right of Way, in order to provide more space for the stream channel restoration and enhancement portion of the project, further avoiding and minimizing impacts. The existing degraded stream buffer area is approximately 5,000 square feet. After stream channel restoration, the proposed buffer area will include 7,020 square feet of appropriate native vegetation. The removal of an existing culvert and the reconfiguration of impervious surface associated with the driveway and parking area will increase the buffer area and allow for restoration of the stream channel with improvements to the on -site riparian buffer. Due to site configuration including the location of the stream across the western portion of the site nearest the existing ingress/egress and the slope of the property coupled with the needs of the project design to allow the residential use to include safe vehicle access for a large work van and extended family needs, the project is necessary for reasonable development of the site. Comment 4 — Process IV Decision Criteria Process IV FWRC 19.19.70.150(3)(a j). (a) It is consistent faith the comprehensive plan; 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC City of Federal Way Response 4 March 16, 2015 Response: The City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) addresses consistency with the Growth Management Act of 1990 and subsequent amendments as well as Vision 2020, the Puget Sound region's multiple urban growth centers concept, and King County's Countywide Planning Policies. The propose project is consistent with the FWCP's intended goal of preservation and enhancement of existing residential neighborhoods, and further, meets the goals of FWCP's Chapter Nine — Natural Environment. The project improves the quality of the natural environment, especially the quality of the City's hydrologic feature, forested areas, and scenic vistas in a residential area in Federal Way. Maintaining and improving the quality of the natural environment in Federal Way is central to the City's vision of the future. The quality of the City's hydrologic features, forested areas, and scenic vistas is one of the primary reasons that many families have chosen to live in Federal Way. Business people also make location decisions based, in some measure, onquality of life factors, and one might argue that the quality of the natural environment is important to the economic vitality of the City. Finally, maintaining the viability of the natural environment is prudent and cost effective public policy. If, for example, the City maintains or improves the natural drainage system and how it functions, it will save tax dollars by not having to build and maintain costly storm drainage facilities. The intent of this chapter, and the goals and policies it contains, is to guide future actions such that the quality of the natural environment is maintained or improved. The project proposes to preserve and restore ecological functions, and enhance natural beauty through site planning that maintains and complements natural landforms. The project proposes to protect the public health and safety and prevent property damage by reducing potential surface water problems by eliminating a 12-inch metal culvert that shows signs of corrosion. In this way, the project can assist the City with helping to prevent or reduce flooding or property damage; minimize erosion and instability of downstream streambeds, banks, and slopes; protect or improve water quality; and maintain or improve the reliability and integrity of the drainage system. The project proposes to restore associated riparian habitat and enhance to protect water quality, potentially reduce public costs, protect fish and wildlife habitat downstream, and prevent environmental degradation. The project includes provisions to: a) Protect the natural hydraulic and ecological functions of drainage systems, maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitat, and restore and maintain those natural functions; b) Control peak runoff rate and quantity of discharges from new development to approximate pre- development rates, and c) Preserve and protect resources and beneficial functions and values through maintenance of stable channels, adequate low flows, and reduction of future storm flows, erosion, and sedimentation. (b) It is consistent with all applicable provisions of this title and all other epplicable lazes; Response: The redevelopment of the residential property is a consistent use as the use of the property is not proposed to be changed. The needs of the land owner, coupled with the restoration and enhancement of the stream corridor and associated buffer area are consistent with all applicable laws and the Federal Way Municipal Code. (c) It is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare; Response: The proposal improves drainage capacity and habitat features on -site, thereby benefitting the surrounding neighborhood and community and the properties downstream of the site. 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC City of Federal Way Response 5 March 16, 2015 Furthermore, by removing the existing on -site culvert, site drainage capabilities will be enhanced by alleviating potential for flooding during high precipitation or high flow storm events. (d) The streets and utala&s Response: As the property is currently used for a single-family residence, the proposal does not change the use of the streets or utilities. (e) The proposed access Response: The proposal does not change the access location or configuration along 92°d Street. 0 Traffic safety Response: The proposal does not change the access location or configuration along 92°d Street Comment 5 — Public Works Public forks Department comments from Ann Dower. These following comments need to be addressed appropriately at this time in order to proceed on the Process IV application. ContactAnn Dow Targeted drainage review as outlined in the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) is being provided. Engineered site plans and drainage review is provided in the plan titled, Grading and Drainage Plan by Contour Engineers LLC dated November 13'', 2014. These plans show cross -sections of the existing pipe and outfalls, proposed stream channel and outfalls, erosion control plans, maintenance requirements. The proposed project complies with stormwater flow control requirements for new single-family residential design as detailed in Appendix C of the KCSWDM. Areas of cut and fill will be shown on the plan view. A financial guarantee will also be provided. Direct responses from the Project Engineer are provided below: • In regard to dispersing or infiltrating the driveway: Due to site restrictions infiltration or dispersion is not an option for the driveway. There is little room to place such a facility and the only area possible suitable would be under the driveway directly north of the proposed residence. Unfortunately, this location will not work as there is a proposed fill wall to the north. If an infiltration facility were to be placed here it would seep through the wall compromising the structural integrity of the wall. • In regard to testing the soils for infiltration feasibility: As there is not adequate space for dispersion or infiltration for the driveway, we do not see a reason to test the soils. Even if the soils were to have a high infiltration rate there would still not be a suitable space. ■ In regard to TESC edits: All TESC requests can be met, per Adam Barnett at Contour, pers comm. 2015. Hopefully this technical memorandum sufficiently addresses concerns detailed by the City of Federal Way regarding the Kim Property. If you have any further questions or comments, please contact me as soon as possible. 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC City of Federal Way Response 6 March 16, 2015 Sincerely, Racheal Villa Fisheries Biologist Soundview Consultants LLC Racheal@soundw-ewconsulWntL.c—ota I101.0001 Kim Residcace Soundview Consultants LLC City of Federal Way Response 7 March 16, 2015 40' � I I z I I � $" +wa=pw 7s.ro' o _ m lz I l A x' W m� u mw 3z rn I o� I � >l J . ' m p. A t55 sd9'0522'E 75.00' •• .- .�.� - - 1 N N T —._UNNAMED —� i� [) $HARE,(] h755 WAY �T y O.. ..: Aspw17RNScC EDGE � vacs y c I I i f n m ' KIM - PROJECT d �7 SOURCE CRANE cSatln �ELV ons Ett�xs 29424 2ND AVENUE SW _ w FEDERAL. WAY, WA 98023 ri'vi nuw-1, N'—".1 IanJ u.r cun.uico,�. F o Q �^ MNG COUNTY PARCEL# 1190003450 290717ad�mi—lhive Office 253.514.8952 7328 IUM $1 E 25 o CAHor �b, PPA9d335 l�u 253.514.8954 �7°wR � 9E77 SEiCI'IONS W. TWP. 21N, RGB. 04E, W.M. J U \ | 2 f | / ! ! - - \ � E \ \ ■ � / m CD _ ) m § § \ 2 § o - - - : / _ \ \ ■ \ ; : : ; ; ; : (\ x N-PROJECT �d a= � a!� nt C pE 294242 AVENUE SW . kRM1K. (>)\FEDERALWAY, mm23 ~ wee 1.4 I-W Ll- C- KINGmu _am 1196003450 ,� . m,17,3.S14.8952 »w' _ _-• m amp w�. mF- � � air»_, � � � � � � � vnu• n} �� zm Dm ry Ym p� N p � - . �n I n 0 m m d KIM- PROJECT ounsEs*ieu ��vfasuCEarzEs SOURCE CRABFREE 45SURVEYING. N 70 0 29424 2ND AVENUE, SW f•,• n imi mtA, Na�n„1 R,.�,�.r . o,�a laml Um Can,al,anu 290711ubmi— Dove Office 2533 4.8932 Lax 253.514,8954 I II Q 25 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 KING COUNTY PARCEL# 1196003450 7m ]ONE Si 1 P zm— � "3ls " y SECTIONS 06,1WP. 21N, RGE. 04E, W.M. Gig Hub—, WA 9035 , C e .e a e, csouncivi.ecu �on�.uCtant�... I Environmental, Natural Resource, and Land Use Consulting C()1nPrchcnsi%c kSSC55111Cnr, Planning, and PermirringScnices 2907 Harborview Drive Gig Harbor, WA 98335 Phone: 253.514.8952 Fax: 253.514.8954 Technical Memorandum RESUBMITTED DEC 2 2 2014 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS To: Jim Harris, Contract Senior Planner, City of File Number: 1101.0001 Federal Way From: Racheal Villa, Soundview Consultants LLC Date: December 5, 2014 Kim Residential Redevelopment: Notice of Incomplete Application File Re: #13-102595-00-UP and 13-102596-00-SE Dear Jim, Soundview Consultants LLC was hired by Chin Sup Kim (Applicant) to investigate the presence of wildlife habitat, and/or priority species. The project is located at 29424 2nd Avenue Southwest in Federal Way, Washington and is comprised of one tax parcel (Parcel Number 1196003450) in the Northeast 'A of Section 06 in Township 21 North, Range 04 East W.M. in King County. The project proposes the construction and redevelopment of a single-family residence. In addition, the project proposes the removal of a culvert and stream channel restoration actions. The project location necessitates intrusion into the 50- foot stream buffer area for construction of the residence and associated infrastructure. The City of Federal Way reviewed the request and provided comments on July 9th of 2013. The comments made by the City of Federal Way are addressed within this technical memorandum and the accompanying documentation and are in italics below. Comment 1— Incomplete Application During the City of Federal Wlay's review, several items were determined missing or incomplete. Response: The following items will be provided to the City of Federal Way in order to complete the application process. ■ Three sets of self-addressed, stamped business sized envelopes of persons receiving property tax statements for all properties within 300 feet of the boundary of the subject property. A list of the addresses with their parcel numbers and a corresponding assessor's map showing the 300-foot boundary will be included. ■ Two hard copies of a current title report for the subject property. ■ Eight copies of site photographs from each compass point referenced on a site plan. • Site photos in digital format will be e-mailed to Jim Harris. 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC City of Federal Way Response December 5, 2014 Comment 2 — Public Works Development Services Divisions submittal request The project proposes to modify an existing drainage pipe and stream. Response: Targeted drainage review as outlined in the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) is being provided. Engineered site plans and drainage review is provided in the plan titled, Grading and Drainage Plan by Contour Engineers LLC dated November 13th, 2014. These plans show cross -sections of the existing pipe and outfalls, proposed stream channel and outfalls, erosion control plans, maintenance requirements. A financial guarantee will also be provided. The proposed project complies with stormwater flow control requirements for new single- family residential design as detailed in Appendix C of the KCSWDM. Areas of cut and fill will be shown on the plan view. Comment 3 — Preliminary Technical Comments Technical issues must be addressed in order for a full technical review of the proposal to be completed. Response: The project proposes stream buffer restoration to mitigate for proposed project actions. In order to gain City of Federal Way staff support, the site plan avoids environmentally critical areas and minimizes any impacts to environmentally critical areas and their buffers to the maximum extent possible. The existing buffer area is 5,737 square feet. After stream channel restoration, the proposed buffer area is 7,020 square feet. The removal of an existing culvert and the reconfiguration of impervious surface associated with the driveway and parking area will increase the buffer area and allow for restoration of the stream channel with improvements to the on -site riparian buffer. This will result in an overall average buffer width of approximately 32 feet. Comment 4 — Size of Single-family residence The proposed footprint of the residence is 2,853 square feet, along with 3,179 additional square feet of impervious driveway areas. The proposed single-family residence and driveways result in intrusions into the 50 foot stream buffer area. The singe family residence and driveway areas significantly exceed reasonable development. Response: The originally proposed residence was 4,500 square feet with two driveways. The new proposed residence is 2,853 square feet with 3,179 square feet of driveway and parking area. This reduction in square footage of residence and impervious driveway allows for increased stream buffer area and restoration of the stream and associated wildlife habitats. The site plans have been updated to reflect minimum necessary encroachment into the stream setback area using engineered project plans to address all onsite surface water and the drainage feature. The site plan has been revised to minimize intrusions into the 50-foot stream buffer area to the maximum extent feasible. A reasonably -sized residence and associated driveways is proposed to be constructed on the site with unavoidable intrusions into the 50-foot stream buffer area. In addition, six copies of revised plans and four copies of revised reports will be submitted with a submittal form to the City of Federal Way. 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC City of Federal Way Response December 5, 2014 Hopefully this technical memorandum sufficiently addresses concerns detailed by the City of Federal Way regarding the Kim Property. If you have any further questions or comments, please contact me as soon as possible. Sincerely, Racheal Villa Fisheries Biologist Soundview Consultants LLC ]tachca](( sotindviewconsultants. c)m 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC City of Federal Way Response December 5, 2014 Attachment 1: Revised Site Plans 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC City of Federal Way Response December 5, 2014 KIM - PROPOSED CHANGES Q 10 26 40 GRAPHIC SCALE 1'-20' ,Lq- X I NO'56'38"E 170.00' 00'5E °3, I I +• PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY ' RESIDENCE �8r APPROX. 36.-5' X-78' (2,853 SF) 32 SEXISTING STREAM BUFFER AREA TO BE +(sue o I 3 ENHANCED WITH NATIVE PLANTS (1,065 SF) " L J to N W U GO 1 00 � ¢ ZI r+—st V' �Lj Z¢ -- zT D V) +I STREAM BUFFER AREA TO BE CREATED/RESTORED WITH PLANTING PLAN (5,955 SF) 113 RESTORED STREAM 134- CHANNEL (1,134 SF) I 1S3 r� 6138"W 170.00' ... 2ND AVE SW U WZ 1 . � � — M E La1� iss 01- 15 Q : 40'NZ �c U (n cc A N d V �.I.t U U) n �t r. �n Ln ^ M; c z L Ln�n = N N n :J V W C e 0 cn c W o"s a a u z ^^ N P-4 ^ P � N N uU O (7 DATE: 12/3/2014 JOB: 1101.0001 BY: JR scALF: 1" = 20' S=T 1 OF z KIM - PLANTING PLAN 0 10 20 40 GRAPHIC SCALE ,• TYPICAL PLANTING LAYOUT SCALE: V = 20' BUFFER SEED MIX PLANT NAME (SCIENTIFIC) COMMON NAME WEIGHT) Agrostis exerata SPIKE BENTGRASS 10 Deschampsia cespitosa I TUFTED HAIRGRASS 10 Deschampsia danthonioides ANNUAL HAIRGRASS 10 Deschampsia elongata SLENDER HAIRGRASS 10 Elymus glaucus BLUE WILDRYE 25 Hordeum brachyantherum MEADOW BARLEY 25 Lupinus polyphyllus STREAMSIDE LUPINE 1 10 PLANT LIST SYMBOL (SCIENTIFIC) COMMON NAME QUANTITYP SIZE (GAL) TYPICAL SPACING (FT O.C.) TREES � tLrii u�. , Prunus emarginata BITTER CHERRY 3 2 10 Pinus Contorta SHORE PINE 2 2 10 A/nus rubra RED ALDER 3 2 10 Thuja plicata WESTERN RED 4 2 10 CEDAR SHRUBS AND PLANTS Acercircinatum VINE MAPLE 4 1 10 Ribes sanquineum RED CURRANT 10 1 5 Rosa nutkana NOOTKA ROSE 30 1 5 (a I tttJJJ vaccinium ovatum EVERGREEN HUCKLEBERRY 22 1 5 l� Gau/theria shallon SALAL 20 1 5 ® Arctostaphyles uva-ursi KINNIKINNIK 25 1 5 E I Sambucus racemosa RED ELDERBERRY 10 1 5 i� Rubus spectabilis SALMON BERRY 15 1 5 GROUND COVER Athyrium filix-femina LADY FERN 75 1 112 Polystichum munitum SWORD FERN 26 1 5 Carex obnupta SLOUGH SEDGE 113 1 1/2 Juncus effusus SOFT RUSH 114 1 1/2 • NOTE: PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS MAY BE MADE WITH WETLAND BIOLOGIST APPROVAL LOCATOR LATH (IF SPECIFIED) — 3 to 4 INCH LAYER OF MULCH NOTES: • PLANT SHRUBS OF THE SAME SPECIES It GROUPS OF 3 to 5. • EXCAVATE PIT TO FULL DEPTH OF ROOT MASS AND CANOPY DIAMETER. SPREAD ROOTS TO FULL WIDTH OF CANOPY. • MIDWAY THROUGH PLANTING ADD AGROFORM TABLET AND WATER THOROUGHLY. • BACKFILL TO BE COMPACTED USAPOW WATER ONLY. • WATER IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE STAKES OPTIONAL. TO BE USED AT DISCRETION OF PROJECT BIOLOGIST 3" DEEP SAUCER FOR WATER Y REMOVE ALL TIES, WRAPS & CONTAINERS. FREE PERIMETER f ROOTS FROM NURSERY BALL. EXCAVATE TREE PIT ATA MIN. OF 4 TIMES DIA. OF ROOTBALL AT BALL CENTER, TAPERING PIT GRADE TO FINISH GRADE. PIT SOILS, NURSERY BALL WASTE BACKFILL SET BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE, OR COMPACTED SOIL. NOTE: WORK PERIMETER ROOTS FREE OF NURSERY BALL S E EXCAVATED PIT TO BE COARSELY SCARIFIED. TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE OVER W z m N N � � 5 o V Q � O N U W C � w O N� w O a O a DATE: 12/4/2014 JOB: 1101.0001 BY: Jx SCALE: AS NOTE SF,EET 2 OF 2 L� ruy 2-5 .c Jim Ferrell, Mayor Date: May 27, 2015 To: Erik Earle, GIS Analyst From: Isaac Conlen, Plannirng Manager FILE RE: Stream Reclassification, Request Stream R (2nd Avenue SW/ SW 292nd Vicinity) The purpose of this memo is to document the Community Development Department request to revise the City GIS maps be updated to reclassify stream ° R" from major to minor. This request applies to the stream segment from the city limits on 15t Avenue South, upstream. The following documents (attached) each conclude this stream is a minor stream. r June 25, 2014, City of Federal Way Surface Water Engineer Jeff Wolf memo to Patrick Doherty. December 12, 1991, Theodore Hunter, Federal Way Hearing Examiner, Findings and Decision of the Hearing Examiner on File UPII-90-0008 October 10, 1990, City of Federal Way letter from Gregory Moore, Land Use Manager, to Bruce Davidson. October 8, 1990, King County letter from Gino Lucchetti, Stream Ecologist, to Corey Smith, City of Federal Way. August 22, 1990, W & H Pacific (City Environmental Consultant) memo to Cory Smith, Associate Planner City of Federal Way. 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 ■ (253) 835-7000 • www.cityoffederalway.com k CITY OF 4AS:P Federal Way DATE: June 25, 2013 THRU: William Appleton PE, Surface Water Manager - To: Patrick Doherty, Community and Economic Development Director col ERom: Jeff Wolf l� �, Surface Water Management Engineer RE: Stream Reciass Request- Stream "R" (2nd Ave. SW/SW 292nd Vic. The purpose of this memo is to respond to multiple citizen requests to evaluate the gradient characteristics of Major Stream No. "R". Based on prevailing contours documented in the City's GIS system; the longitudinal gradient of the original (but now abandoned) channel located within the city limits is approximately 11.9% between the former outfall to Puget Sound at the 5-foot elevation contour and the stream diversion intake pipe (aka- City storm pipe asset No. 15196) at elevation 73.2 feet over an approximately 573 foot length. The estimated longitudinal gradient over the steepest 50-foot length exceeds 23% where the channel flowed over the bluff into the beach. Accordingly; please consider whether a reclassification of this stream from Major to Minor classification is justified upstream of the point where it exits the City limits within City storm pipe asset No. 15196. (This pipe outfalls into the tightlined I` Avenue South storm system within the City of Des Moines before outfalling to Puget Sound within the City of Des Moines.) . Additionally; typically insufficient depth and duration of stream flow would preclude fish passage. Please reference the attached GIS map which documents the location and gradient ofthe channel. WA:jw Attachments- GIS Map cc- Day file CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Mayor Community Development Debra G. Ertel 31130 28th Avenue South Federal Way. WA 98003-5006 City Manager (206) 941-1555 J. Brent McFall October 10, 1990 Mr. Bruce Davidson 28614 Fourth Place South Redondo, Washington-98003 RE: Building Permit #90-0005 29416 2nd Ave SW Federal Way, Washington Dear Mr. Davidson: Council Members Mary E. Gates James V. Handmacher Joel R. Marks Robert E. Stead Lynn J. Templeton James E. Webster The City has received and reviewed the hydrologist report obtained from Watershed Dynamics, Inc. The purpose of the report was to evaluate whether the water course that runs through your property is a stream pursuant to Federal Way Zoning Code definition. The report by Watershed Dynamics determined that the watercourse was not a stream. However, the report from Wilsey & Ham Pacific Engineers (copy enclosed) in response to the Watershed Dynamics report, determined that the watercourse did meet the definition of a stream. The City also requested review of the status of the drainage system from Ding County Surface Water Management Division. Their report (copy enclosed) states that a minor stream channel exists on the site. Given the above information, the Department of Community _Development, has made a determination that the waterflow is classified as a minor stream. The stop work order based upon violation of Section 80.75 of the Zoning Code will not be withdrawn until the stream setback enchoachment issue has been resolved. There are three recourses available to you. 1) You may request a modification to change the setback requirements required for building within fifty feet of a minor stream; or 2) you may appeal the administrative interpretation that this water flow, in fact, constitutes a stream; and 3) you may request a "hardship" waiver/modification pursuant to Federal Way Zoning Code 80.35. In the case of 1 and 2, you will end up at the same decision point: a Process II hearing in front of a Hearing Examiner. The third procedure requires a Process III, the Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing and then make a recommendation to City Council. The City Council would then make the final decision. If you choose to appeal the administrative interpretation, the Hearing Examiner would review the engineers reports to decide whether the water flow is a stream by Federal Way Zoning Code definition. In the event that the City grants a request under Chapter 80 of the Federal Way Zoning Code, it can only grant the minimum necessary to provide you with some reasonable use of the subject property. The City may also impose conditions or restrictions that are appropriate to reduce or eliminate any undesirable or adverse impacts of granting a modification. For your information I have enclosed a copy of:Chapter 80 of the Federal Way Zoning Code, which establishes the criteria for a waiver or modification of the setback requirements. Please feel free to contact Cory Smith at 941-1555 if you have any questions or need assistance. R spectfully, Greg y D. Moore, AICP Lan se Manager c: Kenneth Nyberg, Director of Community Development Kathy McClung, Permit Manager %X"ory Smith, Associate Planner attachments ECEIVED O C i 1 51990 King County Surface Water Management Division Department of Public Works 30 Dexter Horton Building 710Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206)296-6585 October 8, 1990 Nis. Corey Smith, City of Federal Way 31130 - 28th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Stream Identification at Intersection of 292nd Street and Second Avenue Dear Ms. Smith: Thank you for requesting my input on the status of the drainage system in this area. On September 12, 1990, I visited the above area and made the following observations: 1) A minor stream channel exists at the site. This channel has'no existing fish resources and has a low probability of ever supporting fish life; 2) The channel appears to be the result of hydrologic changes in the drainage due to surrounding development. Under pre -development conditions I do not believe that this depressional area could have concentrated enough flow to scour a channel except at or near its confluence with Puget Sound; 3) I estimated that approximately 40 to 50 percent of the existing channel length is contained in culverts or pipes; 4) The primary concerns over development at this site relate to downstream water quality impacts to Puget Sound. RPrnmpndatinns 1) Require landowner to establish a biofiltration swale with native vegetation as mitigation. The objective of runoff control should be to reduce erosion and downstream sedimentation; 2) If a septic system is employed, ensure that the system has adequate capacity and is properly sited away from the stream and in appropriate soils. Ms. Corey Smith October 8, 1990 Page 2 Thank you again for requesting my input. Please do not hesitate to call me at 296-6519 if you have further questions. Sincerely, r-- Gino Lucchetti Stream Ecologist GL:mc (E9:LT3.1.) cc: Ken Guy, Assistant Manager, Surface -Water Management Division Dave Clark, Manager, River and Water Resource Section ATTN: Derek Booth, Program Manager, Basin Planning Program Roz Glasser, Project Manager, Hylebos and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan WILSEY&_ "1 1 RECEIVED - PACIELC A U G 2 1990 1980-112th Avenue N.E. P.O. Box C-97304 C�-�-�. 0� FEDERAL WAY Bellevue, WA 98009-7730 WLDING DEPT. MEMORANDUM TO: Cory Smith, Associate Planner, City of Federal Way FROM: Richard Lowe, P.E., Senior Project Engineer DATE: August 22, 1990 WHP File No.: 3-420-0201 SUBJECT: Watercourse at 29416 2nd Avenue SW Based on a review of the Watershed Dynamics, Inc., letter of August 3rd and a site visit, 'the following comments are made regarding the subject watercourse. In my opinion, the city definition of a stream is met in its entirety with this watercourse. 1. Generally undisturbed areas immediately downstream from the subject property exhibit a bottom and sides characteristic of a well defined watercourse in a small Vee shaped valley. The fact exists that this watercourse has been substantially altered for development for most of its length. The original ground formation which collects the water preexisted any development and is easily located on topographic maps of the area such as the USC&GS maps. 2. The continuous water flow observed in the watercourse during my site visit this week and as reported in the WDI letter is characteristic of a natural drainage way. This water flow would not exist were it only a discharge ditch from the Mar Cheri Subdivision. • The Watershed Dynamics (WDI) letter states the lack of fish population or potential thereof. The discharge is direct to Puget Sound. I concur with this evaluation and therefore recommend that this water course not be considered a MAJOR STREAM. • Any streamwhich is not a MAJOR STREAM is considered in the Federal Way Code to be MINOR STREAM. This is the characteristic which should apply to the subject property. As noted above and detailed in the WDI letter, this watercourse has been substantially altered for most of its length. It has been generally regarded and treated as a nuisance rather than a resource. • The foundation forms are located 15 to 20 feet from the water edge which generally conforms with typical King County requirements for this situation. Federal Way Code requires a 50 foot setback (FWZC 80.75.1.b). l (206) 454-3250 Fax (206) 453-4094 Planning • Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture FINDINGS AND DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMIYER CL IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF: BRUCE DAVIDSON, for a Variance from minor stream setback requirements for construction of a single family residence File # UPII-90-0008 FWHE # 91-15 DECISION I. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION AND DECISION The applicant requests approval of a variance from the minor stream setback requirement of 50 feet to 20 feet in order to construct a single family residence. A variance is allowed if the criteria specified in Section 80.105.3 of the FWZC are met. The Examiner concludes that the City has presented uncontroverted evidence that the criteria are met and, therefore, approves the variance application. II. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL INFORMATION The applicant filed a building permit with the City on March 1, 1990. The permit application showed a "drainage ditch" traversing the west portion of the lot. The plans were reviewed and the building permit was issued on March 20, 1990. During a scheduled foundation inspection on May 1, 1990, the City building inspector noted the foundation was closer than 50 feet to what appeared to be a minor stream under the definition of the Federal Way code. The building inspector posted a stop work order at the site. City staff and consultants reviewed the site and concluded that the "drainage ditch" was, in fact, a minor stream under the definitions of the Federal Way Code. The applicant was advised that a variance would be necessary before any further construction activity would be allowed. The applicant filed a variance application with the City on October 18, 1990 and re -submitted the application with the applicable fee on December 10, 1990. A Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance was issued by the City on August 9, 1991. This MDNS was not appealed. Hearing Date: November 12, 1991 Continued To: November 26, 1991 Decision Date: December 12, 1991 DAVIDSON VARIANCE FILE #UP2-9008 - FWHE #91-15 PAGE 2 At the hearing the following presented testimony and evidence: 1.) Bill Kingman, Associate Planner, City of Federal Way 33530 - 1st Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003 2.) Bruce Davidson 28614 - 4th Place South, Federal Way, WA 98003 3.) Ron Garrow, Senior Engineer, City of Federal Way 33530 - 1st Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003 At the hearing the following exhibits were admitted as part of the official record of these proceedings: 1.) Staff Report a.) Vicinity Map b.) Legal Description c.) Site plan drawing, submitted 3/1/90 d.) SEPA Threshold Determination, issued 8/9/91 e.) Adjacent properties map 2.) Letter from Bruce Davidson to Ken Nyberg, dated 10/22/91 3.) Eight page Facsimile from Bruce Davidson to J. Brent McFall 4.) Letter from Greg Moore to Bruce Davidson, dated 10/1G/90 5.) Letter from -Gino Lucchetti to Cory Smith, dated 10/G8/90 6.) Copy 'of GeoTech Study sent to Bruce Davidson, dated 12/1/89 7.) Entire Federal Way Planning Department File #UP2-90-0008 8.) Letter from Bill Kingman to Hearing Examiner, dated 11/20/91 III. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant requests a variance from the minor stream setback requirement for construction of a single family residence on property located at 29416 2rd Avenue S.W. in Federal Way. The property is approximately 12,750 square feet and is zoned RS 9.6. 2. A water channel exists at the site along the western property line of the site. The channel has no existing fish resources. Approximately 50 percent of the existing channel length is contained in culverts or pipes. The channel also serves as a drainage channel for surface water runoff from adjacent properties as well as the subject property. There is no storm water retention system on the site. DAVIDSON VARIANCE FILE #UP2-9008 - FWHE #91-15 PAGE 3 3. A partially constructed foundation for a single family residence currently occupies the site. This foundation is placed as close as 20 feet away from the stream channel that crosses the lot. 4. The lot is 75 feet wide from east to west. 5. The City-wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan adopted in February, 1990, classifies the property for Suburban Residential development. The Comprehensive Plan also contains a number of goals and policies applicable to this application. These include the Overall Goal to "produce new housing that is planned and developed to protect natural systems..."; Policy H-26 to "give high priority to solving residential environmental problems relating to health and safety"; and Policy H-30 to "prepare maintenance standards to protect storm water systems, prevent erosion and protect natural vegetation." 6. Property surrounding the site is mostly developed with single family residences. These residences are typically significantly less than 50 feet from the stream channel. The subject property does not contain significant open space or provide scenic vistas. 7. A Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on August 9, 1991. Conditions imposed by the City relate to reinforcement of the stream channel, minimization of surface water runoff from any new development on the site, provision of adequate culverts to handle a 100 year storm event, and approval of construction design by the City. The City Is responsible environmental official concluded that there would be no significant adverse environmental impact from approval of this variance application if certain conditions were adhered to. This determination was not appealed. 8. No one presented any testimony in opposition to this application. IV. CONCLUSIONS 1. The City testified that the stream channel on the subject property is, by city definition, a "minor stream". See Section 3.10.500 of the FWZC. The applicant did not contest this designation at the public hearing. The Examiner, therefore, concludes that the water channel on the site is a minor stream. DAVIDSON VARIANCE FILE #UP2-9008 - FAHE #91-15 PAGE 4 2. In order for the Examiner to approve an application for a variance for a setback from requirements from a minor stream, the Examiner must conclude that the criteria in Section 80.105.3 of the FWZC are met. The application for a variance may only be granted if: a. It will not adversely affect water quality. b. It will not destroy or damage a significant habitat area. C. It will not adversely affect drainage or storm water retention capabilities. d. It will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards. e. It will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area nor to the City as a whole, including loss of significant open space or scenic vista. f. It is necessary for reasonable development of the subject property. 3. In addition to the criteria for review of a variance request, the Examiner must also conclude that the decision criteria specified in Section 150.65.3 of the FWZC are met in order to approve an application. These criteria require the Examiner to conclude that the application: a. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. b. Is consistent with all applicable provisions of the Code. C. Is consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. 4. Based on the Findings of Fact detailed above, and on the evidence presented by the City at the public hearing and provided to the Examiner by letter from the City dated November 20th (Exhibit 8), the Examiner concludes that the criteria for the granting of a variance have been met and that the variance application should be granted. DAVIDSON VARIANCE FILE #UP2-9008 - FWHE #91-15 PAGE 5 V. DECISION The only parties presenting evidence at the public hearing were the City and the applicant. The evidence presented to the Examiner was all in support of granting the application. The letter of the City dated November 20th specifically states that the criteria for a variance have been met. There is no opposition to this position. The application for a variance from the setback requirements from a minor stream is GRANTED. Done and dated this 12th day of December, 1991. THEODORE P. HUNTER, Hearing Examiner VI. RIGHTS TO RECONSIDERATION AND APPEAL Any person who has a right to appeal a decision under the Federal Way Zoning Code may request the Hearing Examiner to reconsider any aspect of his or her decision by delivering a written request for reconsideration to the Planning Department within seven (7) calendar days after the date of issuance of the Hearing Examiner's decision. The person requesting the reconsideration shall specify in the request what aspect of the decision he or she wishes to have reconsidered and the reason for the request. The distribution of the recruest and the response to the request shall be governed pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Way Zoning Code. Within ten (10) working days after receiving a request for reconsideration, the Hearing Examiner shall notify the persons who have a right to appeal under the Federal Way Zoning Code, whether or not the decision will be reconsidered. The Hearing Examiner may reconsider the decision only if he or she concludes that there is substantial merit in the request. The process of the reconsideration will be followed in accordance with the Federal Way Zoning Code. The decision of the Hearing Examiner may be appealed by any person who is to receive a copy of that decision pursuant to FWZC 150.65.6. That appeal, in the form of a letter of appeal, must be delivered to the Planning Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the issuance of the Hearing Examiner's decision or, if a request for reconsideration is filed, then within fourteen (14) calendar days of either the decision of the Hearing Examiner denying the request for reconsideration or the reconsidered decision. The letter of appeal must contain a clear reference to the matter being appealed and a statement of the specific factual findings and conclusions of the Hearing Examiner disputed by the person filing the appeal. The person filing the appeal shall )AVIDSON VARIANCE PULE #UP2-9008 - FWHE #91-15 PAGE 6 include, with the letter of appeal, the fee established by the City. The appeal will not be accepted unless it is accomparxied by :the required fee. The decision of the Hearing Examiner May be :appealed whether or not there was a request to reconsider the =Hearing, Examiner 1,,s decision. 4900 117ti00LL �\.l 09 G) 030 -0536 119600 119600 -0505 342 119600 -0555 119600 19600 -0564 R S 9. 6 5 -0575 5' 524Y 51D 595 508 119600 -0535 119600 -0304 512 SW 293RD ST 11yb♦)9 -1680 119600 521 -1670 119600 119600 537 a33 527 1650 -1620 511 -1690 29322 119600 119600 119600 528 -1740 -1770 -1621 119600 524 507 -1750 Aq 119600 119600 -2945 119600 119600 -2947 119600 3005 -2986 523 -2946 589 esoo 422E 535 529 517 422 429 119600.3009 119600 522 519 -3008 119600 119600 -3006 -3007 119600-3025 119600 5 -4227 119600 3 119600 -4063 00 4061 425 .0 6-21-4-63 119600 FW Rating: lli -4060 119600 119600-4084 -4062 5F71 509 119600 -1622 ti ' 19Ga0 ' 222'.,11b600 119600 119600 * '°��• �212 284 '-- RS9. 119600s00 00 -0165 -0075 ,. 119600 ll 7ssca .11 4 PS19600 -, i 22D -0875 BUB, J II 23& ff! y. 119,600 0008 4 399 -0180 119600 904 II 119600 �I 232 12419600 000� 119600 1 R 'ti 306 302 o .0007 ?2n 328 326 320 390 308 304 r _ 01z1 RSJ,.6 -0006 I� 119600 336 -0671 119600 -0670 sect CfiR RS9,G SW 293RD S 119600-0662 35203 119600.0663 119600 29219 -0664 119600 -0665 T P-2 Major 333 325 315 1831D 119600 119600 119600 119600 -1575 -1480 .1470 -1460 119600 R S 9 . 6 • 1823 693 457 323 5✓1 119600 1196 119600 1581 .1 1580 P_1 Major "� 119600 -2948 11960 119600 s06 317 3110 11' 31,0 .3 SW 292ND ST 237 119600 219 211 29205 -0875 119600 119600 119600 -0856 -0840 -0825 119600 1215 -0945 19600 119600 222 -0857 29219 -0955 119600 MU -0905 119600 -0855 119600 -1300 N 119600 > 1465 Q 29350 29325 Q 119600 18i, CV)1310 119600 -1585 294708 119600 -3100 F 119600 31,5 119600 22423 3140 3150 119600 119600 3120 324 3,99 •3ILO Q 3' 0 Major 119600 3160 4D1 119600 317 119600 -3940 119600 -3950 �� -3930 RS9,6 119600 119600 -3903 -3902 000 a 7?nti,2n 720510 nr%n f+ 29309 29349 29339 119600 119600 119600 -1350 -1305 -1355 29343 119600 119600 119600 -1365 -1360 -1315 29337 2932r RS9n6 119600-3265 BUENNA 307 111960029511 119600 2c6 119600 -3905 119600 -3760 3-3780 920 ;9520 119600 -3740 359 119600 119600 3900 3906 Cn IiQ SW 292 N ❑ ST 134 1,17 105 ` 119600 1196125 119600 f 00 -1025 -1020 1010 119600 I!I 0985 f� RS9,6 r 119600 29222 1030 f+ 119600 12.6 118 fl -1045 119600 .1015 29 28 f(J9130 llEI fi 720250 �I -0120 psl j1�7202 50 1T RCT Il 720250 11 -0010 ❑ { 106 Z 13/1196 119600 115 119600 052104 N 1165 1i45 9135 aszls S307 9220 1119600 115 119600 29317-11255 -1240 119600 RS90 110 -1225 �� 4052104 R9.A A1..m2104-9039 -9227 R V\ 4h 052104-9039 — dM an Major 119600 29401 29410 29414 119600 119600 3407 543720-0160 116 119600 -3420 -3411 SIM 29411 !� U) It mac 1� -3428 119600-3410 f� f .11 104 543720 Q j 119600 0150 S ❑ -3412 29417 1 Z 29424 119600 119600 I'r 543721 N 119600 -3425 -3438 119600-3431 29423 ! 1543720 -0020 -3450 11-0010 19-3 11 s 119600 0 543721 -3426 29501 Il 1?g 543721 .0170 119600 ii 11 -0180 -3600 �I 9 11196009600 119600 99905 -3590 r -3597 119600 �� I 184 -3585 29507 fI 5411[ 1 1 901 0040 119600-3800 29530 119600 119600 119600 311 1I1J 543721 119600-3720 29s-28 -3595 -3610 i� EI 2953i� -0020 -3810 �� I 543721 55 .0010 ME REDONDO �• f _ __ _ �� I u :�,3nn,e� _513730-0130� CIF City Center Office Zones: CP-1 Corporate F OP Office Park OP-1 Office Park- OP-2 Office Park- OP-3 Office Park- OP-4 Office Park - PO Professiona Multi -Family Resident, RM1800 1 unit/1,800 RM2400 1 unit/2,400 RM3600 1 unit/3,600 Sin le Family Resider RS5.0 1 unit/5,000 RS7.2 1 unit/7,200 RS9.6 1 unit/9,600 RS15.0 1 unit/15,00 RS35.0 1 unit/35,00 SE 1 unit/5 acrE * Governed b King County Zoning King County Zor Agricultural Zones: A-10 Agricultural, 1 Commercial and Offic, CB Community BIL Neighborhood C Office Residential Zones: R-1 Residential, 1 R-4 Residential, 4 R-6 Residential, 6 R-8 Residential, 8 R-12 Residential, 1 R-18 Residential, 1 f R-24 Residential, Ze R-48 Residential, 4f -P Special Develc Please Note: THE SOLE PUF IDENTIFY ZONING DESIGN inconsistancy between this m establishing the current zonin CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 5, 2015 TO: Ann Dower, Public Works FROM: Jim Harris FOR DRC MTG. ON: NA FILE NUMSER(s): 13-102595-00-UP RELATED FILE NOS.: None - SEPA is done PROJECT NAME: KIM RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ADDRESS: 29424 2ND AVE SW ZONING DISTRICT: RS 9.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed intrustions for house and driveway and associated improvements into a stream buffer. -Restore and enhance on -site portion of minor stream channel and riparian setback area and residential redevelopment. PROJECT CONTACT: SOUNDVIEW CONSULTANTS LLC RACHEAL VILLA 2907HARBOR VIEW DR SuiteD MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Copy of a Soundview Consultants Memo dated 3-16-15 that is addressed to Isaac. This is the only copy I have, which was sent directly to Isaac, and it has markings and red -lines (by Isaac) on the attached site plans. I do not have any clean copy of the site plans. Isaac has asked me to get this to the Process IV stream buffer intrusion hearing. Please provide me comments. Within about the next week or so, can you let me know if this is ok to proceed to Process IV hearing or not. If not, you will need to discuss with Isaac. l CITY OF Federal Way ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Kim Residential Redevelopment and Stream Setback Intrusion File No.13-102596-00-SE Project Description: Proposed action includes removing a stream from an underground culvert and creating a stream course above ground on the subject property. The proposal also includes removing the existing residence and constructing a new residence on the subject property. The new residential structure and associated improvements are proposed to be located within the 50-foot stream setback area. Intrusion into the 50-foot stream setback requires review and approval by the Hearing Examiner following a public hearing. Applicant: Chin -Sup Kim Applicant Agent: Soundview Consultants LLC Project Location: 29424 2nd Avenue SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way - Community Development Department Staff Contact: Jim Harris — Planner, 253-835-2652, jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.032(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal Way Revised Code, 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.31C.060. This DNS is issued after using the o tional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. No written comments were received in response to the 14-da comment period that ended Jamin 30 2015. There is no further comment period on the DNS. You may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk, no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 24, 2015, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination and associated fee. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager for Larry Frazier, Interim Director of Community Development Address: 33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Date Issued: February 10, 2015 Signature: - - CITY OF ti Federal Way February 10, 2015 Rachel Villa Soundview Consultants LLC 2907 Harborview, Suite D Gig Harbor, WA 98335 i CITY HALL FILE 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com RE: File No. 13-102596-000-00-SE; SEPA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Kim Residential Redevelopment and Stream Setback Intrusion, 29424 2"d Avenue SW, Federal Way Dear Ms. Villa: The city and jurisdictional agencies have reviewed the environmental checklist submitted with the Kim residential redevelopment and stream setback intrusion Process IV Master Land Use (MLU) application. It has been determined that the proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. As a result, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is enclosed. The Optional DNS Process was used to review this proposal. The 14-day comment period required by SEPA Rules ran concurrently with the public comment period associated with the notice of land use application, which began on January 16, 2015, and ended January 30, 2015. The city did not receive written comments regarding the MLU application or environmental checklist. Pursuant to Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-355, a second comment period is not required upon issuance of the DNS. The enclosed DNS was issued on February 10, 2015. The city will provide a copy of the DNS to the Department of Ecology, agencies with jurisdiction, Puyallup and Muckleshoot tribes, and anyone requesting a copy. All final determinations may be appealed within 14 days following the issuance of the DNS. No licenses, permits, or approvals will be issued until completion of the appeal period, which ends February 24, 2015. The decision not to require an EIS does not grant the license, permit, or approval you are seeking from the city. The 11 environmental record is considered by the decision maker(s) and conditions will be imposed to reduce identified environmental impacts, as long as the conditions are based on adopted and designated city policy. After a final decision has been made on your proposal you may, but are not required to, publish a Notice ofAction as permitted in RCW 43.21 C.075. The Notice of Action sets forth a time period after which no legal challenges _ regarding the proposal's compliance with SEPA can be made. The city is not responsible for,publishing the Notice of Action. Questions regarding the environmental review component should be directed to me at 253-835-2652 or jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, ,r-P del— �Panner ris enc: DNS c: Mi-Young and Chin -Sup Kim, 34102 131h Pl SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Doc. LD. 67929 CIT Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www. it offederoiwa .corn DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION l hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) �8( N*#gg7of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other was V mailed ❑ faxed F,k_&X.,Ic 2015. Project Name ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document .19[e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on File Number(s) Signature Date K:\CD Administralion Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /8/2015 10:07:00 AM -A - CITY OF ' - Federal Way ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Kim Residential Redevelopment and Stream Setback Intrusion File No. 13-102596-00-SE Project Description: Proposed action includes removing a stream from an underground culvert and creating a stream course above ground on the subject property. The proposal also includes removing the existing residence and constructing a new residence on the subject property. The new residential structure and associated improvements are proposed to be located within the 50-foot stream setback area. Intrusion into the 50-foot stream setback requires review and approval by the Hearing Examiner following a public hearing. Applicant: Chin -Sup Kim Applicant Agent: Soundview Consultants LLC Project Location: 29424 2nd Avenue SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way - Community Development Department Staff Contact: Jim Harris — Planner, 253-835-2652, jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.032(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal Way Revised Code, 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.31C.060. This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. No written comments were received in response to the 14-daycomment 12eriod that ended JanuM 30 2015. There is no further comment period on the DNS. You may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk, no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 24, 2015, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination and associated fee. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager for Larry Frazier, Interim Director of Community Development Address: 33325 8`h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Date Issued: Februaryl0, 2015 Signature: ----- Tamara Fix From: Tamara Fix Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:18 AM To: 'separegister@ecy.wa.gov'; 'Brian Asbury'; 'gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov'; 'sepadesk@dfw.wa.gov'; 'Fisher, Larry D (DFV)'; Chris Ingham; Gordon Goodsell; 'brandon.reynon@puyalluptribe.com'; 'laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us'; 'karen.waiter@muckleshoot.nsn.us';'racheal@soundviewconsultants.com' Cc: Jim Harris Subject: Kim Residential Redevelopment and Stream Setback Intrusion DNS Attachments: 20150210092112.pdf Attached is the DNS for the above -mentioned project. This was issued on February 10, 2015, and the planner for the project is Jim Harris, 253-835-2652, iim.harris@cityoffederalway.cam. _�/-ANNE ANDERSON US ARMY CORPS/ENGINEERS ATTN REGULATORY BRANCH PO BOX 3755 SEATTLE WA 98124 DEPT OF ECOLOGY SEPA UNIT PO BOX 47703 SLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 ,Pnareoi5terDecv.wa.pov - JAMEY TAYLOR DNR SEPA CENTER PO BOX 47015 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7015 s e pacenterCa7d n r. wa. g ov PAULROGERS NATURAL RESOURCES CVN SVC 935 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 a u 1. rog ers wa.usda. av MARSHA ENGEL PUGET SOUND PARTNERSHIP 210 11T" AVE SW STE 401 OLYMPIA WA 98504-0900 marsha.en el s .wa. ov WA NATURAL HERITAGE DNR PO BOX 47014 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7014 se @center dnr.wa. ov prF!?T-pF-AR GY & LDEEPT LER /HISTORIC PRESERVATIO FISH AND WILDLIF PO BOX 48343 3200OLYMPIAWA 98504-8343 WA 98504-3155 gretchen.keehler@dah .wa.gov dfw.wa. ov LAURA ARBER (saltwater) WDFW REGION 4 OFFICE 16018 MILL CREEK BLVD MILL CREEK WA 98012-1296 la ura.arberCa7.dfw.wa. goy BRACNDON REY ;zfUYALLUP TRIBE OF IND HISTORIC PRESERVATION DE 3009 E PORTLAND AVE TACOMA WA 98404 HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT 23828 30" Ave S KENT WA 98032 mfossos (6hig h I i newate r. org RACHEAL VVILLA SQUNDVIEW CONSULTANTS LLC 2907 HARBORVIEW DR STE D i GIG HARBOR WA 98335 ra ch e a l Aso u n dvl ewcon S LI [t a nts - com TONNA BARUS❑ CENTURY LINK COMMUNICATIONS 2510 84T" ST S STE 18 LAKEWOOD WA 98499-9034 NAI-YOUNG & CHIN -SUP KIM 34102 13T" PL S FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 L Y FISHER (freshwater) VVDFW AREA HABITAT BIOLOGIST 1775 12T" AVE NW STE 201 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 Tarr .fisher dfw.wa. ov 0CLIRA MURPHY TRIBAL ARCHAEOLOGIST MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE 39015 172N11 AVE SE AUBURN WA 98092 CITY OF DES MOINES 21630 11T" AVE S DES MOINES WA 98198 dlathro desmoineswa. ov JERRY STEELE ,90MCAST CABLE COMM 4020 AUBURN WAY N AUBURN WA 98002-1315 GORDON HOWELL QWEST COMMUNICATION 2510 S 84T" ST STE 18 LAKEWOOD WA 98499 REVIL .1TEAM WA DEPT OF COMMERCE GROWTH MGT SERVICES PO BOX 42525 OLYMPIA WA 98504-2525 reviewteam rC7r.commerce.wa. ov B rA AN SBURY KEHAVEN UTILITY DIST PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 basburv(5)1akehaven. or KELLY COOPER DEPT OF HEALTH ENVIRON HEALTH DIV PO BOX 47820 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7820 kell .coo er doh.wa. ov PORT OF TACOMA ENVIRONMENTAL DEPT PO BOX 1837 TACOMA WA 98401-1837 i ordan ortoftacoma.com smauerman n(cD portoftacoma.com 0C'TH KING FIRE &. E Ctl� 31617 1 ST AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 chns.in ham southkin fire.or ' ordon. oodsell southkin fire ar CITY OF TACOMA 747 MARKET ST TACOMA WA 98402-3769 shirle .schultz ci.tacoma.wa.us KCESHOOT INDIAN I Rttk FISHERIES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98092 �r rriuckleshoot.nsn.tls are) ,,� ( jo � US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVCE 510 DESMOND DR SE #102 LACEY WA 98503 FEMA REGION 10 NTH DIV 130 228T" ST SW BOTHELL WA 98021-9796 cI is 4, tip( � Lt I't- Jim Harris From: Tina Piety Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 1:18 PM To: reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov'; ECY RE SEPA REGISTER (separegister@ecy.wa.gov); basbury@lakehaven.o'rg; 'sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov'; Kelly Cooper; gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov; 'sepadesk@dfw.wa.gov'; larry.fisher@dfw.wa.gov; Chris Ingham; Gordon Goodsell; brandon.reynon@puyalluptribe.com; 'laura.arber@dfw.wa.gov'; laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us; 'shirley.schultz@ci.tacoma.wa.us'; 'mfossos@highlinewater.org'; dlathrop@desmoineswa.gov; 'kwalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us'; rachael@soundviewconsultants.com';'suzanne.l.anderson@usace.army.mil'; 'paul.rogers@wa.usda.gov'; 'marsha.engel@psp.wa.gov; 'jjordan@portoftacoma.com'; Isamauermann@portoftacoma.com' Cc: Jim Harris Subject: Federal Way DNS Attachments: Kim Residential Redevelopment DNS and Checklist.pdf Hello, Attached you will find the DNS and checklist for a Federal Way Project. It is the Kim Residential Redevelopment and Stream Setback Intrusion. If you have any comments and or questions, please contact Contract Planner Jim Harris at iim.harris@cityoffedera lway.com, or 253-835-2652. Thank you, Tina Piety, Administrative Assistant II Department of Community Development City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2601; Fax 253-835-2609 1% CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITv DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-8352607; Fax 253-835-2609 www cit vol'f4deralway.com RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC RECEIVED BY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COMMUNM & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - -' JAN 15 2015 SIGN INSTALLATION CERTIFICATE Project Name: I tyl fif /Opxv 6"'? 2,- Project File No: / ? " /&;L5 qS ^' UP R j ) 2 5 �L Project Address: ?_ Z/ 2- J Ave,e,-t Installed By: / Date of Installation: Location of Installation: a sa �m�iea sro �a �a ra ■� �n raa spa �e ca �a ua c� �n ea rm sa r� Kn s-3s1eJ■a s5'ia ia rn ca ia ■ I hereby testify that the sign installed fully complies with the installation standards of the Department of Community Development Service's "Instructions for Obtaining & Posting Public Notification Signs" and that the sign will be maintained until a final decision is issued on the land use action. I understand that failure to return this certificate within five days of posting may result in delays, notice of corrections, and re -mailings at the applicant's expense. 1 ■ 0,!uy r � Z r- Installer's Name InstAer's Signature Date '471-5-3 1-772 -247-Ml- Phone Bulletin #036—January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Sign Installation Certificate DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003-6325 CITY OF 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 Federal Way www,cityofederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION i, Kalon Thomas _ hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ■ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or i posted to or at each of the attached addresses on January 15. 2075. Project Name Kim Residential Redevelonment and Stream Setback Intrusion File Number(s) 13-102595-00-UP & 13-102596-00-SE Signature Date Posting Sites: Federal Way City Hall - 33325 8th Avenue Federal Way Regional Library - 34200 1 st Way South Federal Way 320th Branch Library - 848 South 320th Street Subject Site - 29424 2nd Avenue SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Kim Residential Redevelopment and Stream Setback Intrusion Project Description: Proposed action includes removing a stream from an underground culvert and creating a stream course above ground on the subject property. The proposal also includes removing the existing residence and constructing a new residence on the subject property. The new residential structure and associated improvements are proposed to be located within the 50-foot stream setback area. Intrusion into the 50-foot stream setback requires review and approval by the Hearing Examiner following a public hearing. Applicant: Chin -Sup Kim Applicant Agent: Soundview Consultants LLC Project Location: 29424 2nd Avenue SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Application Received: June 12, 2013 Determined Complete: January 5, 2015 Notice of Application: January 16, 2015 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the city, it is likely that the Responsible Official will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes and policies. Additionally, the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Environmental comments must be submitted by the date noted below. Permits Under Review: Process IV Stream Setback Intrusion (File #13-102595-00-UP), and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Threshold Determination (File #13-102596-00-SE) Existing Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan for Kim Residence by Soundview Consultants LLC, dated June 2013; Storm Water Technical Information Report by Contour Engineering LLC, dated December 2014; and Environmental Checklist. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16, "Surface Water Management" and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Comments regarding the environmental (SEPA) components of the application are due January 30, 2015. Comments regarding the Process IV stream setback intrusion application may be submitted to the Hearing Examiner by delivering these comments to the Community Development Department prior to the public hearing date, or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision, which is the final decision by the city. Details of appeal procedures for the decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Staff Contact: Jim Harris, Contract Planner - 253-835-2652 orjim.harris@cityoffederalway.com 13-102596 Doc ID. 67660 41k CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederolway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, c hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MONS) ['Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other was mailed ❑ faxed 2015. Project Name AY. ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on File Number(s)13 - Signature --r Date K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /12/2015 2:46:00 PM L I A�� CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Kim Residential Redevelopment and Stream Setback Intrusion Project Description: Proposed action includes removing a stream from an underground culvert and creating a stream course above ground on the subject property. The proposal also includes removing the existing residence and constructing a new residence on the subject property. The new residential structure and associated improvements are proposed to be located within the 50-foot stream setback area. Intrusion into the 50-foot stream setback requires review and approval by the Hearing Examiner following a public hearing. P_ _ � Applicant: Chin -Sup Kim Applicant Agent: Soundview Consultants LLC Project Location: 29424 2nd Avenue SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Application Received: June 12, 2013 Determined Complete: January 5, 2015 Notice of Application: January 16, 2015 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the city, it is likely that the Responsible Official will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes and policies. Additionally, the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Environmental comments must be submitted by the date noted below. Permits Under Review: Process IV Stream Setback Intrusion (File #13-102595-00-UP), and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Threshold Determination (File #13-102596-00-SE) Existing Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan for Kim Residence by Soundview Consultants LLC, dated June 2013; Storm Water Technical Information Report by Contour Engineering LLC, dated December 2014; and Environmental Checklist. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16, "Surface Water Management" and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Comments regarding the environmental (SEPA) components of the application are due January 30, 2015. Comments regarding the Process IV stream setback intrusion application may be submitted to the Hearing Examiner by delivering these comments to the Community Development Department prior to the public hearing date, or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision, which is the final decision by the city. Details of appeal procedures for the decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Staff Contact: Jim Harris, Contract Planner - 253-835-2652 or jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com 13-102596 Doc. I.D. 67660 q M o 00 M 0 00 M M clq 0 0 00 00 J a, M 00 0, c , 0, ` * 3 as 3 3 GS,z 33333 U) w 0o w�www w�www ��Q �J o 00 - M O 00 a\ (+1 O O 00 a, M O O 00 C� N C) M O CD 00 C� M N O 00 O1 M CDN CD 00 � M CD 00 O, M O" CD 00 O, M O 00 O, M O O 00 01 W U 9 M N CD 00 a1 M CV O 00 a, M N O = O\ N N N O, M O 00 all M M N N Nall O O 00 00 O, a1 333>33°�33333w333 x ¢ ¢ ¢ a ¢ 30�00 00 � 3 3 A H a cn w AW www�GwwrAV w A w Q W w A w Q w �d Q w A rwJ.u,ww w Q w A w� Q p A wwwc.waw Q A Q Q W W Q A w w z J H Ex- ¢ Q o Q Q a00 AZC11 F+ oo 00 Q A > N 00 A w N 3o3a,r-0 X N N j %C Cam] C� O �1 N N En _ Cl) M ;�CC1, N N N Vl r1C F- N � � ai � CA O —4wt- �--� =��M,O�N00�,Ozo�N O kn O N M O� O O O W N N O M 0 O `�° N rn M m O rn � O, N O, to O\ O, "t O, v O, a1 O O, O, O, O O N M r--i �n N �n N ¢ rr a N N fS, o�, N N ,--� N O, N N M N N N N N� N N N C` W't s F z z � w Wzz qA w w W W U cn �i �x fop + as Z+ H ¢ U + z A a `Q�' F 2 OP � w WA z U v ¢ Q z z O W O x Z v U ¢ U w w z ¢ wcn w A z a U z x .a Q3�F"Fo-°Wz��'�O�,wzUz� z W . �� y C7 aC z a 0 w CIO OU 0 O kn kn o kn to r- (=> N O W) Ic w 00 kn O In r- O o O O o O O Wn 00 ,O ,O ,O O ^� N " N N M m 00 O, O, O, O N 00 - M N d "t t 't-t-,t- - - W) ,O ,Or- r- 00 --� .--� .--� --� M M M Cl) M M M Cl) M M M M M M M M M M M M cn M O O O O O O O O O O O CD CD O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O J l0 ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O �O ,D ,O ,D ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O ,O x 01 O, O, O, O, O, O, O, O, a, O, as O, O, O, O, O, O, a, O, 01 O, O, O, O, O, O, M Ln (D f- w m O N M lf) Uo CO I� N rV N 4- 0 N m a 6/26/2013 1T t A^ City of Federal Way City O1Tt 300e Parcel 33325 8th Ave S. f .0 Box 9718 Federal Way Notification area �G2 S FederaWay (206) - 35 - 78350.98063 00 www.cityoffederaKvay.com 11960D-0945- 119600=0905 � 119600=1-045- -I'lSOuu-l'l,-)- 119600- 119600- Zr 119600-1300 1305 1350 N 119600- 119600- +' 119600-1359 1173 119600-1165 1145 r I f _ Q 119600-1310 119600- 119600- 119600- 119600-1255 119600 122 1315 i 1360 1285 119600-1240 - --__ 119.600-1365 119600-3428 119600-3407 119600-34'11 119600-3420 119600-3410 119600-3265 Q Q 1196.00-3438 119600-3412 Z 11960Q-3425 1 -I N J119600-3450 119600-3431 119600-3426 119600- J 119600-3590 3905 ! 119600- 00-3780 119600-3597 119 6 G 3760 119600-3740 119600-3585 119600-3600 1 r ` I 119600-3800 119600- 119600-3720 119600-3595 119600- 3810 3610 1 720531-' t 513720- i 513730- - 062104- 1 0110 720531-� 0200 ` 513730- 0130 r 9089 0100 513720- 0140 0190 513730- 720531-0090 0120 062104- 1513720- � - - 9093 , 720531-0080 0180 �! 51330 a1110 513730-011D Legend CITY OF King County Tax Parcels scale: Federal Way Subject Property N 0 50 100 Feet - f I This map is olended for usv as a gfaphlc.I representation only. Notified Properties The City of Federal Way make no warranty as to its accuracy. It d r c c 6 u a C w C C L 41k CIT Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederatway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) \Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed lye -mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2015. Project Name File Number(s) /3- Af (f—" - Y' Signature Date K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /12/2015 2:46:00 PM CITY OF k Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Kim Residential Redevelopment and Stream Setback Intrusion Project Description: Proposed action includes removing a stream from an underground culvert and creating a stream course above ground on the subject property. The proposal also includes removing the existing residence and constructing a new residence on the subject property. The new residential structure and associated improvements are proposed to be located within the 50-foot stream setback area. Intrusion into the 50-foot stream setback requires review and approval by the Hearing Examiner following a public hearing. Applicant: Chin -Sup Kim Applicant Agent: Soundview Consultants LLC Project Location: 29424 2n1 Avenue SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Application Received: June 12, 2013 Determined Complete: January 5, 2015 Notice of Application: January 16, 2015 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the city, it is likely that the Responsible Official will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes and policies. Additionally, the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Environmental comments must be submitted by the date noted below. Permits Under Review: Process IV Stream Setback Intrusion (File #13-102595-00-UP), and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Threshold Determination (File #13-102596-00-SE) Existing Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan for Kim Residence by Soundview Consultants LLC, dated June 2013; Storm Water Technical Information Report by Contour Engineering LLC, dated December 2014; and Environmental Checklist. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16, "Surface Water Management" and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Comments regarding the environmental (SEPA) components of the application are due January 30, 2015. Comments regarding the Process W stream setback intrusion application may be submitted to the Hearing Examiner by delivering these comments to the Community Development Department prior to the public hearing date, or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision, which is the final decision by the city. Details of appeal procedures for the decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Staff Contact: Jim Harris, Contract Planner - 253-835-2652 orjim.harris@cityoffederalway.com 13-102596 Doc, I D. 67660 Tina Piety From: Jennifer Anderson <jnderson@fedwaymirror.com> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:27 AM To: Tina Piety Subject: Re: Legal Notice Got it, thanks! Jennifer Anderson Advertising Sales Consultant Office: 253-925-5565, Ext 3056 Internal: 02-3056 Fax: 253-925-5750 31919 1st Ave S, Ste 101, Federal Way, WA 98003 Sound Publishing, Inc. Map Print mates Online Rates Media Kit Sound Info On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Tina Piety <Tina.Piet @cit offederalwa .cone wrote: Hello, Please publish the attached legal notice (Kim Residential Redevelopment NOA and DNS, 13-102596-SE) in Friday's (1/16/15) issue. Please furnish an affidavit of publication. Thank you, Tina Tina Piety, Administrative Assistant II Department of Community Development City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2601; Fax 253-835-2609 1 31919 1'Ave S, Su r,,_ L'IA Ca5 1253.925.5750 (f) Affidavit of Publication Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained by the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way- Community Development as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive weeks(s), commencing on the 16th day of Manua 2015 , and ending on the 16th day of January 2015 both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 174.48, which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.020. Subscribed to and sworn before me this 13th day of March 2015. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Buckley - NOTARY Z r PUBLIC ; 2 '��,�F WAs��•`ti CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING PROOHRECEIPT Client: 93145 FWM Legals Address. -- Ad # 610716 Requested By: Sales Rep.: Class.: Start Date: PO #: Publications: Paid Amount: Total Price: Lanum, Laura Phone: (253) 946-2890 Federal Way, WA Fax: Phone: (360) 394-8714 legals@soundpublishirlg.com Fax: (360) 598-6800 9930 FW Le 01/16/2015 FWM2194 Federal Way Mirror $0.00 End Date: 01/16/2015 Nb. of Inserts Balance: $0.00 Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Kim Residential Redevelopment and Stream Setback Intrusion Project Description: Proposed action includes re- moving a stream from an underground culvert and creating a stream course above ground an the sub- ject property. The proposal also includes removing the existing residence and constructing a new resi- dence an the subject properly. The new residential structure and associated improvements are pro- posed to be located within the 50-1001 stream set- back area. Intrusion into the 50-foot stream set- back requires review and approval by the Hearing Examiner following a public hearing. Applicant: Chin -Sup Kim Applicant Agent: Soundviaw Consultants LLC Project Location: 29424 2nd Avenue SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Application Received: June 12, 2013 Determined Complete: January 5, 2015 Notice of Application: January 16, 2015 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other in- formation on file with the city, it is likely that the Responsible Official will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Deter- mination of Nonsignif€cance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the pro- posed project. The proposal may include mitiga- tion measures under applicable codes and policies. Additionally, the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specifie proposal may be ob- tained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to _eview and comment on the proposed project and Page 1 of 2 —Iffits probable environmental impacts. Environment) comments must be submitted by the date noted below. Permits Under Review: Process IV Stream Setback Intrusion (File #13-102595-00-UP), and State Envi- ronmental Policy Act (SERA) Threshold Determina- tion (File #13-102596-00-SE) Existing Environmental Documents & Required Studies- Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan for Kim Residence by Soundview Consultants LLC, dated June 2013; Storm Water Technical Information Report by Contour Engineer- ing LLC, dated December 2014; and Environmental Checklist. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitiga- tion: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16, "Surface Water Management" and Title 19, "Zoning and Develop- ment Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Comments regarding the environmental (SEPA) components of the ap- plication are due January 30, 2015. Comments re- garding the Process IV stream setback intrusion application may be submitted to the Hearing Exam- iner by delivering these comments to the Commu- nity Development Department prior to the public hearing date, or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written deci- sion may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decisioni, which is the final decision by the city. Details of appeal procedures for the decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable signifi- cant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development, 33325 Bth Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 90003 Staff Contact: Jim Harris, Contract Planner - 253- 835-2652 or jim.harris@cltyoffederalway.com Published in the Federal Way Mirror January 16, 2015 FWM 2194 4ik CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalwqy.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, �o, 'C'_ hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation 0 Other -5 t Z� was mailed Project Name ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ faxed A7 e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on WI& I File Number(s) /3 - 16 ' l - Signature r . A- Date /C51 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /12/2015 2:46:00 PM CITY OF - Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Kim Residential Redevelopment and Stream Setback Intrusion Project Description: Proposed action includes removing a stream from an underground culvert and creating a stream course above ground on the subject property. The proposal also includes removing the existing residence and constructing a new residence on the subject property. The new residential structure and associated improvements are proposed to be located within the 50-foot stream setback area. Intrusion into the 50-foot stream setback requires review and approval by the Hearing Examiner following a public hearing. i. r '1-..� Applicant: Chin -Sup Kim Applicant Agent: Soundview Consultants LLC Project Location: 29424 2"d Avenue SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Application Received: June 12, 2013 Determined Complete: January 5, 2015 Notice of Application: January 16, 2015 L, ;�► z r Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the city, it is likely that the Responsible Official will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes and policies. Additionally, the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Environmental comments must be submitted by the date noted below. Permits Under Review: Process IV Stream Setback Intrusion (File #13-102595-00-UP), and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Threshold Determination (File #13-102596-00-SE) Existing Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan for Kim Residence by Soundview Consultants LLC, dated June 2013; Storm Water Technical Information Report by Contour Engineering LLC, dated December 2014; and Environmental Checklist. '1 1 Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16, "Surface Water Management" and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Comments regarding the environmental (SEPA) components of the application are due January 30, 2015. Comments regarding the Process IV stream setback intrusion application may be submitted to the Hearing Examiner by delivering these comments to the Community Development Department prior to the public hearing date, or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision, which is the final decision by the city. Details of appeal procedures for the decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Staff Contact: Jim Harris, Contract Planner - 253-835-2652 orjim.harris@cityoffederalway.com 13-102596 Doc, I.D. 67660 SUZANNE ANDERSON PAUL ROGERS REVIEW TEAM US ARMY CORPS/ENGINEERS WA DEPT OF COMMERCE ATTN REGULATORY BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES CVN SVC GROWTH MGT SERVICES PO BOX 3755 935 PO AVE PO BOX 42525 SEATTLE WA 98124 RENTON W WA 98055 OLYMPIA WA 98504-2525 suzanne.l.anderson@usace.army.mil Paul.rogers@wa,usda.00v reviewteatn commerce.wa. ov DEPT OF ECOLOGY MARSHA ENGEL BRIAN ASBURY SEPA UNIT PUGET SOUND PARTNERSHIP LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST PO BOX 47703 210 11T" AVE SW STE 401 PO BOX 4249 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-0900 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 separegisterP,ecy.wa.gov marsha.engelppsp.wa.gov basburyyftlakehaven.or KELLY COOPER JAMEY TAYLOR WA NATURAL HERITAGE DEPT OF HEALTH DNR SEPA CENTER DNR ENVIRON HEALTH DIV PO BOX 47015 PO BOX 47014 PO BOX 47820 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7015 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7014 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7820 sepacenter@cInr_wa.gov sepacenterOdnrma.gov kell .co❑ er doh.wa. ov PORT OF TACOMA DEPT OF ARCHAEOLOGY & BOB ZEIGLER ENVIRONMENTAL DEPT HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE PO BOX 1837 PO BOX 48343 PO BOX 43200 T WA 98401-1837 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8343 OLYMPIA WA 98504-3155 ordandan@ ortoftacama.cam gretchen.kaehlergdahoma.goy sepadesk c@dfw.wa.gov smauermannQportofta ooma.cam LAURA ARBER (saltwater) LARRY FISHER (freshwater) SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE WDFW REGION 4 OFFICE WDFW AREA HABITAT BIOLOGIST 31617 1ST AVE S 16018 MILL CREEK BLVD 1775 12T" AVE NW STE 201 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 MILL CREEK WA 98012-1296 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 chris.in harp southkin fire.ar laura.arberCu)dfw.wa.gov Iarry.fisher(�Ddfw.wa.goy_gordon.goodseliAsouthk.ingfire.orcI BRANDON REYNON LAURA MURPHY PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS TRIBAL ARCHAEOLOGIST CITY OF TACOMA HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPT MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE 747 MARKET ST 3009 E PORTLAND AVE 39015 172ND AVE SE TACOMA WA 98402-3769 TACOMA WA 98404 AUBURN WA 98092 shir1e .schultz ci.tacoma.wa.us brandon.reynon ptlyal}uptribe.com laura.murphv@muckleshoot.nsn.us MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT CITY OF DES MOINES FISHERIES DIVISION 23828 30th Ave S 21630 11T" AVE S ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER KENT WA 98032 DES MOINES WA 98198 39015 172ND AVE SE mfossos@highlinewatef,.org dlath ropAdesmoineswa.gov AUBURN WA 98092 kwalter@muckleshoot.psn.us RACHEAL VILLA SOUNDVIEW CONSULTANTS LLC JERRY STEELE US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVCE 2907 HARBORVIEW DR STE D COMCAST CABLE COMM 510 DESMOND DR SE #102 GIG HARBOR WA 98335 4020 AUBURN WAY N LACEY WA 98503 racheal _ soundyiewconsultants.com AUBURN WA 98002-1315 TONNA BARUSO GORDON HOWELL FEMA CENTURY LINK COMMUNICATIONS QWEST COMMUNICATION REGION 10 NTH DIV 2510 84T" ST S STE 18 2510 S 84T" ST STE 18 130 228T" ST SW LAKEWOOD WA 98499-9034 LAKEWOOD WA 98499 BOTHELL WA 98021-9796 MI -YOUNG & CHIN -SUP KIM 34102 13T" PL S FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 Tina Piety From: Tina Piety Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 1:18 PM To: 'reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov'; ECY RE SEPA REGISTER (separegister@ecy.wa.gov); basbury@lakehaven.org; 'sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov'; Kelly Cooper; gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov;'sepadesk@dfw.wa.gov'; larry.fisher@dfw.wa.gov; Chris Ingham; Gordon Goodsell; Brandon.reynon@puyalluptribe.com; 'laura.arber@dfw.wa.gov'; laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us;'shirley,schultz@ci.tacoma.wa.us'; 'mfossos@highlinewater.org'; dlathrop@desmoineswa.gov; 'kwalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us'; rachael@soundviewconsultants_com';'suzanne.l.anderson@usace.army. mil, ; paui.rogers@wa.usda_gov'; 'marsha.engel@psp.wa,gov'; 'jjordan@portoftacoma.com'; 'samauermann@portoftacoma.com' Cc: Jim Harris Subject: Federal Way DNS Attachments: Kim Residential Redevelopment DNS and Checklist.pdf Hello, Attached you will find the DNS and checklist for a Federal Way Project. It is the Kim Residential Redevelopment and Stream Setback Intrusion. If you have any comments and or questions, please contact Contract Planner Jim Harris at jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com, or 253-835-2652. Thank you, Tina Piety, Administrative Assistant II Department of Community Development City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2601;Fax 253-835-2609 Tina Piety From: postmaster@usda.gov To: 'paul.rogers@wa.usda.gov' Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 1:20 PM Subject: Undeliverable: Federal Way DNS Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: 'paul.rogers@wa.usda.gov' <mailto:paul.rogers@wa.usda.gov> The e-mail address you entered couldn't be found. Please check the recipient's e-mail address and try to resend the message. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk. Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: usda.gov paul.rogers@wa.usda.gov #< #5.1.1 smtp;550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found> #SMTP# Original message headers: Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (207.46.163.236) by mail.usda.gov (199.135.140.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.195.2; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:18:51 +0000 Received: from (unknown [207.46.163.236]) by DOAGTICWASDC01-avms-01c-01mb-ews.usda.gov with smtp id 73c6_1ba1__405e2d22_9dc5. 11e4 a558_3c4a92f06b88; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:18:44 +0000 Received: from BY2PR06CA058.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.250.176) by CO1PR06MB380.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.51.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.59.20; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:18:28 +0000 Received: from BNlAFFO11FD034.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c10::196) by BY2PR06CA058.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:2c60::48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.59.20 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:18:28 +0000 Received: from smtp2.cityoffederalway.com (146.129.247.211) by BNlAFFO11FD034.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.58.52.158) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.49.13 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:18:27 +0000 Received: from CFWEXCH1.cfw.local ([::1]) by cfwexch2.cfw.local ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 13:18:24 -0800 From: Tina Piety <Tina.Piety@cityoffederalway.com> To: "'reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov"' -,reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov>, "ECY RE SLNA REGISTER (separegister@ecy.wa.gov)" <separegister@ecy.wa.gov>, "basbury@lakehaven.org" <basbury@lakehaven.org>, "'sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov"' <sepace nter@dnr.wa.gov>, Kelly Cooper <kelly.cooper@doh.wa.gov>, "gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov" <gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov>, "'sepadesk@dfw.wa.gov"' <sepadesk@dfw.wa.gov>, "larry.fisher@dfw.wa.gov" <larry.fisher@dfw.wa.gov>, Chris Ingham <chris.ingham@southkingfire.org>, Gordon Goodsell <gordon.goodsell@southkingfire.org>, "brandon.reynon@puyalluptribe.com" <brandon.reynon@puya lluptribe.com>, "'laura.arber@dfw.wa.gov"' <laura.arber@dfw.wa.gov>, "laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us" <laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us>, shirley.schultz@ci.tacoma.wa.us"'<shirley.schultz@ci.tacoma.wa.us>, mfossos@highlinewater.org"' <mfossos@highlinewater.org>, I'd lath rop@desmoineswa.gov" <dlath rop@desmoineswa.gov>, "'kwalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us"' <kwalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us>, III rachael@soundviewconsultants.com"' <rachael@soundviewconsultants.com>, III suzanne.l.anderson@usace.army.mil"' <suzanne.l.anderson@usace.army.mil>, "'paul.rogers@wa.usda.gov"' <paul.rogers@wa.usda.gov>, "'marsha.engel@psp.wa.gov"' <marsha.engel@psp.wa.gov>, "'jjordan@portoftacoma.com"' <jjordan@portoftacoma.com>, "'samauermann@portoftacoma.com"' <samauermann@portoftacoma.com> CC: Jim Harris <Jim.Harris@cityoffederalway.com> Subject: Federal Way DNS Thread -Topic: Federal Way DNS Thread -Index: AdAxOfXlrVEvBfUSSAms/fpSsEVBdA== Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:18:23 +0000 Message-ID:<311A044183E7F041A417DE9D75FD76CE0746D997@cfwexchl.cfw.local> Accept -Language: en -US Content -Language: en -US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.6.22.54] Content -Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_006_311A044183E7F041A417DE9D75FD76CE0746D997cfwexchlcfwloca_" MIME -Version: 1.0 Return -Path: Tina.Piety@cityoffederalway.com X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: cityoffederalway.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Authentication -Results: spf=none (sender IP is 146.129.247.211) smtp.mailfrom=Tina.Piety@cityoffederalway.com; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:146.129.247.211;CTRY:US;I PV: N LI; EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(428002)(189002)(199003)(44114002)(48214007)(195804 05001)(19580395003)(106466001)(16236675004)(46102003)(92566002)(22756005)(568964001)(18206015028)(227460 05)(64706001)(104016003)(55846006)(229853001)(19627595001)(15843345004)(17760045003 )(105586002)(45010000 1)(102836002)(15975445007)(19625215002)(87836001)(86362001)(98436002)(33656002)(2501002)(101616003)(5129 54002)(50986999)(567704001) (101416001)(62966003)(77156002)(2900100001)(84326002)(2656002 )(2930100002)(99 936001)(54356999)(6806004)(2920100001)(19300405004)(921003)(491001)(79686002)(1121003);DI R:I NB;SFP:;SCL:1;S RVR:CO1PR06M B380; H:smtp2.cityoffederalway.com;FPR:;SPF:None; MLV:sfv; PTR:smtp2.cityoffederalway.com; MX:1;A:1 ; LANG:; X-DmarcAction-Test: None X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; 2 Tina Piety From: Microsoft Outlook To: 'samauermann@portoftacoma.com' Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 1:19 PM Subject: Undeliverable: Federal Way DNS smtp2.portoftacoma.com rejected your message to the following e-mail addresses: 'samauermann@portoftacoma.com' (samauermann ortoftacoma.com) <mailto:samauermann ortoftacoma.com> smtp2.portoftacoma.com gave this error: No such user (samauermann ortoftacoma.com) A problem occurred during the delivery of this message to this e-mail address. Try sending this message again. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk. Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: CFWEXCH2.cfw.local samauermann@portoftacoma.com smtp2.portoftacoma.com #550 No such user (samauermann@portoftacoma.com) ## Original message headers: Received: from CFWEXCH1.cfw.local ([::1]) by cfwexch2.cfw.local ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 13:18:24 -0800 From: Tina Piety <Tina. Pi etV2 City,offederalwa .com> To: "'reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov"' <reviewteam commerce.wa.gov;�, "ECY RE SEPA REGISTER (separegister@ecy.wa.gov)" <separegister ecy.wa.gov>, "basbur lakehaven.or " <basbury lakehaven.or>, "'sepace nter@dnr.wa.gov"' <sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov>, Kelly Cooper <kell .coo er doh.wa. ov>, " retchen.kaehler dah .wa. ov" < retchen.kaehler dah .wa. ov>, "'sepadesk@dfw.wa.gov"' <sepadesk@dfw.wa.aov>, "larrv.fisher@dfw.wa.g_ov" <1arry.fisher r1 dfw.wa.gov>, Chris Ingham <chris.in ham southkin fire.or >, Gordon Goodsell <gordon.goodsell _ southkingfire.org>, "bra ndon.re non 2puyallu tribe.com"<brandon.reynon2pu.alluptribe.com>, "'laura.arber@dfw.wa.gov"' <Iaura.arber@dfw.wa.gov>, "laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us"<laura.murphv@muckleshoot.nsn.us>, "'shirley.schultz@ci.tacoma.wa.us"'<shirley.schultz@c.tacoma.wa.us>, 1 "'mfossos@high linewater.org"' �,rnfossos @highlinewater.or >, "dlathro desmoineswa. ov" <dlath rop@desmoineswa.gov>, "'kwalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us"' <kwalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us>, "'rachael@soundviewconsultants.com"'<rachaei@soundviewconsultants.com>, "'suzanne.l.anderson@usace.army.mil"'<suzanne.l.anderson@usace.army.mil>, III paul.rogers@wa.usda.gov"' <paul.rogers@wa.usda.gov>, "'marsha.engel@psp.wa.gov` <marsha.e_ngel@psp.wa.gov>, "'jjordan@portoftacoma.com"' <lol rdan _portoftacoma.com>, "'samauermann@portoftacoma.com"' <samauermann@portoftacoma.com> CC: Jim Harris <Jim.Harris@cityoffederalway.com> Subject: Federal Way DNS Thread -Topic: Federal Way DNS Thread -Index: AdAxOfXlrVEvBfUSSAms/fpSsEVBdA== Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:18:23 +0000 Message-ID:<311AO44183E7FO41A417DE9D75FD76CE0746D997@cfwexchl.cfwJQcal> Accept -Language: en -US Content -Language: en -US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.6.22.54] Content -Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_006_311A044183E7FO4lA417DE9D75FD76CE0746D997cfwexchlcfwloca_" MIME -Version: 1.0 P) '3"-(_9 kjA WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: 13 - (0 -�_Ib -.Sp The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDmON, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. RECEIVED JUN 12 2013 CM OF FEDERAL WAY r_.os Bulletin#050 —January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Kim Property Redevelopment and Stream Restoration Project 2. Name of applicant: Chin -Sup Kim 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Chin -Sup Kim 34102 13th Place Southwest Federal Way, Washington 98023 (253) 405-3348 Authorized Agent/Contact: Racheal Villa Soundview Consultants LLC 2907 Harborview Drive Gig Harbor, Washington 98335 (253) 514-8952 4. Date checklist prepared: May 20, 2013 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Start date: Upon approval 09/2013 End date: 09/2015 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No, the project includes residential property redevelopment over improvements with an associated stream channel restoration plan to improve an existing stream crossing for residential access. Bulletin#050 — January 1, 2011 Page 2 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Project JARPA dated May 20, 2013 and Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan by Soundview Consultants LLC dated June 10, 2013 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No other projects are proposed for the subject property at this time. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Critical Areas Ordinance approval from City of Federal Way, Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) from Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Section 401 Water Quality Certification from Washington Department of Ecology, and Section 404 approval from the US Army Corps of Engineers. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The Applicant proposes to replace the existing residential structure with a new 4,500 square foot single family residence and update infrastructure on their 0.45-acre property. The project will necessitate maintaining the existing stream channel crossing to access the residence. However, the removal of the drainage course from the 65 foot long culvert and replacement of the culvert with two 15 foot long box culverts over two driveway crossings will improve the crossing configuration. The remainder of the drainage course is proposed enhanced by the Applicant to a more natural meander configuration within a gentler slope as shown on the drawings available with the application package. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposed project site is located at 29424 2nd Avenue Southwest in Federal Way, Washington. The project exists on one tax parcel (Parcel Number 1196003450) in the Northeast '/a of Section 06 in Township 21 North, Range 04 East W.M. in King County. Legal description, site plans, vicinity map, and topographic maps are provided with the application package. Bulletin#050 — January 1, 2011 Page 3 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other...... The topography of the site consists of a central topographic bench, with short, steep slopes in the southwest, southeast, and northeast property areas. The site slopes descend generally to the north with an identified minor stream channel and culverts located across the western side of the subject property. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope is approximately 50% along the perimeter of the property. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soil is primarily Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 6 to 15 percent slopes with Alderwood and Kitsap soils, very steep slopes in the eastern edge, according to the NRCS web soil survey. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. The site appears stable; however, King County SAO erosion is mapped in the south and east portions of the site. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Site grading is proposed to facilitate the residential redevelopment and associated infrastructure with a restored low flow and high flow drainage channel to limit flooding on the subject property and downslope. Site grading and excavation of the new stream channel will create a natural meander to replace the existing culverted stream. All fill will likely be sourced from on -site borrow areas in upland areas or from approved suppliers, and will be free of pollutants and hazardous materials. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Site grading is proposed; however, the Applicant and project contractor will ensure temporary erosion and sediment control measures are in place prior to project actions and will remain in place until the site is stabilized. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately fifty (50) percent of the site will be covered by impervious surfaces. Bulletin#050 — January 1, 2011 Page 4 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Minimization efforts include conducting project actions during summer months when the stream is at the seasonal dry period, implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) for construction to minimize erosion, and installation of temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC) before demolition or grading begins. Native vegetation will be planted after grading and excavation to reduce erosion. The replacement of landscape vegetation and interrupted riparian area with native vegetation will be carefully implemented to avoid any unstable earth or erosion hazards. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During the construction phase of the project, exhaust from construction equipment and minor amounts of dust may be emitted, as is expected. Construction work will involve typical equipment for residential buildings. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Vehicles using the adjacent roadways are expected to have minimal impact on the proposed project. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: During construction operations, water can be applied to the site to control any dust escapement, if needed. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. An un-named drainage crosses the western portion of the subject property flowing south to north and flows through residential area culverts greater than 1,100 feet downstream to the Puget Sound. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The project will require work within the un-named drainage. The project will necessitate the removal of the drainage course from the culvert and replacement of the culvert with box culverts over two driveway crossings. The remainder of the drainage course is proposed enhanced by the Applicant to a more natural meander configuration within a gentler slope. Bulletin#050 — January 1, 2011 Page 5 of 17 kAHandoutsTrivironmental Checklist All proposed actions will provide a net improvement in water quality and hydrologic function of runoff in the watershed. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Approximately 65 feet of the existing 170 lineal feet of drainage will be daylighted and relocated to a proposed natural meander channel with low flow and high flow areas and gentler slopes along the western portion of the subject property. Any excavation or fill in the uplands to place the new channel will likely be sourced from on -site borrow areas in upland areas or from approved suppliers and will be free of pollutants and hazardous materials. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. The project will divert approximately 65 lineal feet of drainage course from an existing culvert and driveway crossing and replacement with box culverts to access the residence. The onsite portion of the drainage will be daylighted and relocated to a proposed natural meander channel with gentler slopes and native plants above the high flow channel that will provide increased flood protection, water quality, and habitat availability over existing conditions. No surface water withdrawals are proposed for this project. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No, the proposal does not lie within a 100-year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No discharges of waste materials to surface waters are proposed. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No change of hydrology across the site is proposed or anticipated due to the proposed project. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Bulletin#050 — January 1, 2011 Page 6 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist The residential use of the subject property will not change and no changes in waste systems are proposed. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater runoff from the driveway onsite would enter municipal stormwater facilities along the adjacent roadway. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The residential use of the subject property will not change and no changes in waste systems are proposed. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The onsite portion of the drainage will be daylighted and relocated to a proposed natural meander channel with gentler slopes and native plants above the high flow channel that will provide increased flood protection, water quality, and habitat availability over existing conditions. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass — pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other — water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other X other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The stream setback/riparian area will be restored and replanted with appropriate native plants within the confines of the site. The vegetation to be removed is predominately non-native and ornamental species including but not limited to English ivy, evergreen and Himalayan blackberry, and scotch broom. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No sensitive plant species are known to be on or near the site. Bulletin#050 — January 1, 2011 Page 7 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The stream setback/riparian area will be restored and replanted with appropriate native plants within the confines of the site. Enhancement actions for the stream buffer and the subject property include, but may not be limited to, the following actions; hand -remove where possible or pre -treat invasive plants with a Washington Department of Agriculture approved herbicide, replant all cleared areas with native species (trees, shrubs, and ground cover), an approved native seed mix will be used to seed the disturbed areas after planting trees and shrubs, and irrigation will be provided as necessary by the property owner to help ensure plant survival. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. ESA -listed species in the County include: Northern Spotted Owl (Stria ocdi knta& cavina) Marbled murrelet (Brachyrmpbw marmoratus) Whitebark pine (Pinus albicau&) Bull Trout (Salaslinus confluentus) Grizzly bear (Ursus arctos hornbills) North American wolverine (Gulogulo luscus) However, no suitable habitat or individuals are identified in the project vicinity and these species will not be affected by the proposed work. c. is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The site is not part of any known migration route. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The proposed project is anticipated to provide substantial improvements to water quality as well as wildlife habitat and stormwater retention capabilities. A large onsite portion of the drainage will be daylighted and relocated to a proposed natural meander channel with gentler slopes and native plants above the high flow channel that will provide increased flood protection, water quality, and habitat availability over existing conditions. Removing the flows from the metal culvert will provide an immediate water quality improvement as well as increase onsite flow capacity. Native Bulletin#050 — January 1, 2011 Page 8 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist r vegetation will be planted on the riparian slopes to provide an improved, vegetated buffer. All proposed actions will provide a net improvement in water quality and hydrologic function of runoff in the watershed. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed proj ect's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The completed project is anticipated to use electricity at the same level or lower than is currently used. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. It is unlikely that use of solar energy by adjacent properties would be affected by the proposed development. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: No specific energy conservation features are proposed as part of this project. However, as this is a redevelopment project that provides updated infrastructure, the use of modern transmission and lighting equipment and updated building standards will likely provide some minor improvement in energy efficiency. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Typical construction equipment with potential for leaks of hydraulics or fuel will be used; however, construction BMPs include regular maintenance and inspection of equipment, and a Spill Prevention Plan is required via the contractor. Once construction is complete, the risk of fire is possible with any development. No other environmental health hazards are anticipated to occur as a result of this proposal. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. In case of emergency, typical first responders to treat medical emergencies and appropriate regulatory entities (example- Department of Fish and Wildlife), per conditions of approval, Bulletin#050 — January 1, 2011 Page 9 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist would be notified if a fuel spill or other environmental emergency were to occur during construction. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Best Management Practices, such as construction area containment, are proposed for over - water work to reduce likelihood of spills or debris entering the water. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Low volume residential traffic exists on the adjacent roadway. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term noise due to the project will include typical construction machinery including dump truck and excavator. The work will commence during regular daytime working hours and comply with local noise ordinances. The long-term noise will not change from the existing residential use. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The work will commence during regular daytime working hours and comply with local noise ordinances. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The proposed project area is fully developed and contains existing impervious surfaces including a single-family residence and a driveway. Surrounding properties also contain residential buildings. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No, this site has not been used for agricultural purposes. c. Describe any structures on the site. The site contains a single-family residence, and a driveway. The site slopes descend generally to the north with an identified minor stream channel and culverts located across the western side of the subject property. The drainage is confined within a corrugated metal culvert for approximately 65 lineal feet of the approximately 170 lineal feet total onsite drainage segment. Bulletin#050 — January 1, 2011 Page 10 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist kd. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The project proposes complete residential redevelopment including removal of the existing residence and infrastructure, including the driveway and shed. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Zoning classification of the site is RS9.6 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan designation is single family, high density. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not Applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The site is located in the vicinity of mapped great blue heron colony and breeding sites (WDFW); however, no suitable habitat or individuals are identified onsite or in the immediate vicinity and these species will not be affected by the proposed work. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The residential use is not proposed to change from the existing single family use. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No one would be displaced by the project, please see answer above. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not Applicable 1) Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed project maintains existing use and is compatible with use designation in the city of Federal Way. Bulletin405O —January 1, 2011 Page 11 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. The residential use is not proposed to change from the existing single family use. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None, as the project is proposing to construct a new residence to replace the current single family mobile home on site. The residential use is not proposed to change from the existing single family use. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: The residential use is not proposed to change from the existing single family use. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The new single family residence will comply with building code for the zoned area and the height will not exceed the maximum building heights. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views will be obstructed as the project will comply with building code and the project proposes to replace an existing single family residence. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The proposed project provides upgrades to existing facilities, and thus providing improvements to aesthetic value of the property. 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposed project is not expected to alter the light or glare at the site. Project actions are proposed during working daylight hours. Facility operation would remain in effect during normal business hours, when vehicle traffic would occur. Bulletin#050 — January 1, 2011 Page 12 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The proposed project is not expected to alter the light or glare at the site; therefore, no alteration in lighting conditions is likely to pose safety hazard or interfere with views. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? There are no known sources of off -site light or glare that will adversely impact the proposed project. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: There are no measures proposed to reduce or control light or glare impacts. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The shoreline is approximately 0.25 miles to the northwest and 0.20 miles to the east is PowellsWood Garden. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No, the project will have no impacts on recreational uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not Applicable, the project will have no impacts on recreational uses. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. To our knowledge, there are no known places or objects listed for preservation as historic or culturally significant on or next to the site. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. To our knowledge, there are no known places or objects listed for preservation as historic or culturally significant on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Bulletin#050 — January 1, 2011 Page 13 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Not applicable. To our knowledge, there are no known places or objects listed for preservation as historic or culturally significant on or next to the site. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The property contains a driveway that connects to 2nd Avenue Court Southwest in the northwest corner of the subject property. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? King County Transit (> 1 mile) provides service near the site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No change in parking spaces is proposed. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No change in roadways or streets is proposed or necessary for the site. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transporta- tion? If so, generally describe. The proposed project will not use water, rail, or air transportation. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No changes to vehicular trips per day are proposed due to the nature of the project to replace a single family residence only. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not Applicable as no changes to vehicular trips per day are proposed due to the nature of the project to replace a single family residence only. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Bulletin#050 — January 1, 2011 Page 14 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist No changes are proposed to uses or need for public services; therefore, no impacts are likely. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No changes are proposed to uses or need for public services; therefore, no impacts are likely. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: <Eectrici aturai stet fuse sere i teIephone nitaty sewer, tic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The project proposes to maintain existing utilities. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: ........................................................................(11 ........... DateSubmitted: .............. f. ....'.`....................................................................................................... 1 Bulletin#050 — January 1, 2011 Page 15 of 17 k:\3andouts\Environmental Checklist D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Bulletin#050 — January 1, 2011 Page 16 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist 1�k CITY OF Federal 1 NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Kim Residential Redevelopment and Stream Setback Intrusion Project Description: Proposed action includes removing a stream from an underground culvert and creating a stream course above ground on the subject property. The proposal also includes removing the existing residence and constructing a new residence on the subject property. The new residential structure and associated improvements are proposed to be located within the 50-foot stream setback area. Intrusion into the 50-foot stream setback requires review and approval by the Hearing Examiner following a public hearing. Applicant: Chin -Sup Kim Applicant Agent: Soundview Consultants LLC Project Location: 29424 2nd Avenue SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Application Received: June 12, 2013 Determined Complete: January 5, 2015 Notice of Application: January 16, 2015 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the city, it is likely that the Responsible Official will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes and policies. Additionally, the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact -statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Environmental comments must be submitted by the date noted below. Permits Under Review: Process IV Stream Setback Intrusion (File #13-102595-00-UP), and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Threshold Determination (File #13-102596-00-SE) Existing Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan for Kim Residence by Soundview Consultants LLC, dated June 2013; Storm Water Technical Information Report by Contour Engineering LLC, dated December 2014; and Environmental Checklist. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16, "Surface Water Management" and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Comments regarding the environmental (SEPA) components of the application are due January 30, 2015. Comments regarding the Process 1V stream setback intrusion application may be submitted to the Hearing Examiner by delivering these comments to the Community Development Department prior to the public hearing date, or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision, which is the final decision by the city. Details of appeal procedures for the decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Staff Contact: Jim Harris, Contract Planner - 253-835-2652 orjim.harris@cityoffederalway.com 13-102596 Doc, I D 67660 ST Subject Site 11 n 21 II�J a G -=- !_ .. File #13-104617-00-UP Doc ID 68301 ' FILE CIT IIZA�& Federal Way February 5, 2015 Ms. Rachel Villa Soundview Consultant LLC 2907 Harborview Drive, Suite D Gig Harbor, WA 98335 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com Re: File #13-102595-00-UP; PLANNING DIVISION TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Kim Residential Redevelopment —Process IV Stream Setback Reduction Request Site Address: 29424 2"d Avenue SW, Federal Way Dear Ms. Villa: The Department of Community and Economic Development has completed our technical review of information you submitted to the City on December 22, 2014, for the proposal to remove a stream from a culvert and request to intrude into the 50-foot stream setback area in order to construct a new single- family residence. The project is being reviewed under the provisions of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.70, "Process IV Hearing Examiner Review"; and FWRC Title 19, "Critical Areas"; in addition to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The application was deemed complete on January 5, 2015. A Notice of Application (NOA) and optional SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued on January 16, 2015. The comment period for the optional DNS expired on January 30, 2015. TECHNICAL COMMENTS Unless otherwise noted, the following comments 1 - 5 below must be addressed prior to setting a hearing date and preparing a staff recommendation to the Hearing Examiner for the Process IV application. Prior to issuance of the Process IV staff report and recommendation, City staff will issue the final SEPA determination, which will have a 14-day appeal period. The project site plan proposes a stream buffer reduction from the code -required 50-foot minimum buffer width, down to a stream buffer width ranging from approximately 5 feet to a maximum width of approximately 25 feet, resulting in an average stream buffer width of approximately 17 feet. This results in a request for a stream buffer reduction of approximately 33 feet on average. In order to gain staff support for any stream buffer reduction, the site plan should look to first avoid any environmentally critical areas, and second, minimize any impacts to environmentally critical areas and their buffers. As proposed, the footprint of the single-family residence pad is 2,853 square feet, which is a very large single-family residential footprint. In addition, the site plan shows an additional 3,179 square feet of impervious driveway area (6,032 total impervious area). Both the building footprint and driveway areas are very large for a single-family residential use and result in the need to encroach into the stream setback area. Ms. Rachel Villa Page 2 February 5, 2015 Staff suggests that the site plan be updated to reflect the minimum necessary encroachment into the stream setback area. One of the main decision criteria city staff bases their recommendation on, and the Hearing Examiner makes his decision on, is FWRC 19.165.070(3)(f), which states the intrusion into the stream setback area, "...is necessary for reasonable development of the subject property." It appears that a reasonable sized residence and accompanying reasonable sized driveway and associated improvements could be constructed on the site with minimal intrusions into the 50-foot stream buffer area. In order to proceed on the Process IV stream setback application, please address each of the following comments. 1. My previous correspondence noted that the site plans need to clearly demark the Federal Way Revised Code required 50-foot stream setback line. The December 3, 2014, site plan does not identify the 50-foot stream setback line and must be revised accordingly. In a couple spots on the site plan, label the proposed distance from the stream to the proposed driveway. Label dimensions of the driveway on the site plan. 2. In a December 11, 2013 e-mail, City staff previously informed you of two potential alternatives that we would support moving forward to the Hearing Examiner for the Process IV stream setback intrusion. The December 3, 2014, site plan does not implement either of the alternatives identified in my December 11, 2013 e-mail. City staff identified we would provide a favorable recommendation to the Hearing Examiner for one of the two following alternatives, A and B, discussed below. The site plan submitted on December 22, 2014, does not make any advances to meeting either of the two alternatives discussed in my e-mail. At this time, in order to gain staff support for the Process IV stream setback intrusion, you can revise the plans to meet one of the alternatives discussed in my December 11, 2013 e-mail (identified below), or a third alternative would be for you to request City staff to proceed to the Hearing Examiner with your December 3, 2014 site plan. Alternatives: A. Implement the attached previously provided red -line plan dated City comments 12-11-13, which would eliminate the north -south driveway and the remaining area between the house pad and creek would be stream buffer. B. Implement a site plan including a north south driveway parallel and adjacent to the house pad, with a maximum driveway width of 10 feet, and the driveway in the stream buffer area would need to be of a Grasserete or similar low impact material, meeting acceptable engineering design standards. File # ] 3-102595-00-UP Doc. I.D. 67915 4 Ms. Rachel Villa Page 3 February 5, 2015 C. Request City staff to proceed with the existing site plan dated December 3, 2014. With this alternative, City staff would recommend conditional approval of the proposal subject to the stream buffer intrusions being reduced as described in alternatives A or B, in order to meet the "... reasonable development criteria." Please let us know which of the three alternatives above that you are proceeding with. The burden of proof is on the applicant to show how. the proposal meets the applicable Federal Way Code criteria. I suggest that you further address (beyond the response in page 10 of the June 2013 Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan) FWRC 19.165.070(3)(f), which states: "It (stream setback intrusion) is necessary for reasonable development of the subject. property." 4. Provide a written response to how the proposal for the stream setback intrusion meets each of the Process IV decision criteria of FWRC 19. 19.70.150(3) (a-f). (a) It is consistent with the comprehensive plan; (b) It is consistent with all applicable provisions of this title and all other applicable laws; (c) It is consistent with the public health, safety and welfare; (d) The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal; (e) The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration for access; and (0 Traffic safety impacts for all modes of transportation, both on and offsite, are adequately mitigated. 5. Public Works Department comments from Ann Dower. These following comments need to be addressed appropriately at this time in order to proceed on the Process IV application. Contact Ann Dower at Ann.dower(@cityoffederalway.com or 253-835-2732 regarding these comments. Section 1.3 of the Technical Information Report states that runoff from the driveway will be collected and discharged into the open drainage course. The King County Su7face Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) requires that runoff from driveways be dispersed or infiltrated. Please revise to reflect an acceptable flow control method. Please note, contrary to the statement in section 9, a bond will be required for the stream restoration prior to construction. Soils tests to determine soils type and infiltration rate are required. Please review section C.2.2.1 of the KCSWDM. Sheet C1 and C2 The TESC plan is confusing since it shows the old house and the new dispersion trench, but not the new house footprint and the proposed creek bed. Perhaps a separate demolition plan is needed for clarity. File #13-102595-00-UP Doc, 1.D. 67815 Ms. Rachel Villa Page 4 February 5, 2015 The TESC plan on sheet C1 will be applicable only during the time of least disturbance, not for more intense -activity such as constructing and stabilizing the creek bed and the home. Further protection for the side slopes and bottom of the creek, such as blankets, wattles, check dams, etc., must be provided. Silt fence must be shown to prevent erosion from the house and dispersion trench construction from entering the creek bed. The construction sequence indicates that the stream bed will be graded prior to starting the house. Staff suggests that the house -be constructed first. Then the site could be stabilized prior to starting the creek bed; thereby reducing the opportunity for spills and erosion from the site to enter -the creek. There would also be less wear and tear on the new culvert. Provide distance and slope measurements for the vegetated flow path. Provide dispersion, infiltration, or other BMP to control runoff from the driveways. Provide a curb along the south side so the driveway does not drain directly over the slope into the creek. Although the technical memorandum states that they are included in the Contour Engineering plans dated 11/3/14, I did not fmd cross sections showing the existing pipe and outfall, or the proposed stream, channel and outfall. These, along with areas of cut and fill, must also be provided at this time. Note: the retaining walls will require a separate building permit if they are 4' tall or more, measuring from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall. APPLICATION STATUS The review period for the Use Process IV application has stopped and the application is on hold until requested,items are submitted. When submitting requested information, please provide a written response to each of the above -referenced items, five copies of corrected reports, and six copies of half sheet size plans with the enclosed resubmittal form. Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed void. The FWRC can be reviewed in its entirety at littp:1,lwww.codepublishing.com/Nva/federa]%A,av/. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at jiiii.liarrisncitvoifederalway.com, or 253-835-2652. Sincerely, 1m P rris ract Planner enc: Resubmittal Form c_ Mi-Young and Chin -Sup Kim, 34102 131h Pl SW, Federal Way, WA. 98023 Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer File #13-102595-00-UP Doe. I:D. 67815 CITY Of Federal Way January 5, 2015 Ms. Rachel Villa Soundview Consultant LLC 2907 Harborview Drive, Suite D Gig Harbor, WA 98335 FILE CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederatway.. com Re: File #13-102595-00-UP and 13-102596-00-SE; Notice of COMPLETE APPLICATION Kim Residential Redevelopment — Process IV Stream Buffer Reduction Request Site Address: 29424 2"`' Avenue SW, Federal Way Dear Ms. Villa: The Department of Community Development has conducted a cursory review of information you submitted to the City on December 22, 2014, and additional information submitted in a January 5, 2015 email, in response to the City's July 8, 2013 Notice of Incomplete Application. This initial review is to determine if the Process IV and SEPA applications are complete for the proposed Kim Residential Redevelopment. The project is being reviewed under the provisions of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.70, "Process IV Hearing Examiner Review"; and FWRC Title 19, Division 5, "Critical Areas"; in addition to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.15.045, if the Use Process IV application was found incomplete and an applicant submits additional information, the city shall notify the applicant in writing within 14 days, the date the application is deemed complete or whether further additional information is necessary. COMPLETE APPLICATION Please consider this correspondence as a Letter of Complete Application. The application is deemed complete as of January 5, 2015, based on a review of your submittal relative to those requirements as set out in FWRC 19.15.040. The items noted on the July 8, 2013, Notice of Incomplete Application letter were submitted to the City on December 22, 2014 and January 5, 20151. The submittal requirements are not intended to determine if an application conforms to the City of Federal Way codes; they are used only to determine if all required materials have been submitted. A technical review of the Process IV application will now begin. You can expect a combined technical review letter for the Process IV application in approximately two to four weeks of this letter. The Process IV Hearing Examiner decision on the application will be issued within 120 days of this letter. Please be advised that any period in which the city requests additional information or correction to plans is not included in the 120-day "review clock." Three sets of self-addressed stamped envelopes of persons receiving property tax statements for all properties within 300 feet of the subject property were requested and required; however ,only two sets were provided. A third set may be required and must be submitted by the applicant when requested by the City. Ms. Villa January 5, 2015 Page 2 Having met the submittal requirements, a Notice of Application will be published in the Federal Way Mirror, posted on site, and posted on the City's official notice boards within the next two weeks. The applicant will be responsible for posting the notice board on site, and we will give you further instruction on that process in about one week. CLOSING If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please feel free to contact me at 253-835-2652 orjim.harris@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, /yv"L Harris Contract Senior Planner c: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer 13-102595 Doc. LD. 67606 RESUBMITTED Lawyers Title Agency of Washington DEC 2 2 2014 North Region Title Unit CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Brenda McCoy, Sr. Title Officer, Unit Manager • Ken Ewen, Title Officer CDS Genevieve Luke, Assistant Title Officer • Rhonda Caton, Title Assistant Direct: (425) 551-5501 (425)252-1222 • Fax: (425) 742-7972 Email: brendam@lawyerstitlewa.com • kene@lawyerstitlewa.com 15014te Avenue, #308 • Seattle, Washington 98101 SECOND REPORT SCHEDULE A To: John L. Scott, Inc. - Federal Way 31620 23rd Avenue S., Suite 101 Federal Way, Washington 98003 Attn: 1/1 Chuck Cochran 1. Effective Date: MAY 26, 2005 at 8:00 AM 2. Policy Or Policies To Be Issued: ALTA Homeowner's Owner's Policy, (10/22/03) Homeowners Resale Rate (X) Standard Coverage ( ) Extended Coverage Order Number: 373807 Your Reference: Amount: $253,000.00 Premium: $808.00 Tax: $69.49 Proposed Insured: Chin -Sup Kim and Mi-Young Kim, presumptively subject to the community interest of his/her spouse if married on or since, the date of acquiring title (X) ALTA Loan Policy, (10/17/92) Simultaneous Rate Amount: To Be Determined ( ) Standard (X) Extended Proposed Insured: To Be Determined Premium: To Be Determined 3. The estate or interest in the land is described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: Fee Simple 4. Title to said estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: James D. Henry and Carole J. Henry, husband and wife Page 1 of 10 Order Number: 373807 5. • The land referred to in this conmiR ment is described in Exhibit A. Lawyers Title Agency of Washington, Agent for Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation By. e-�97c- Brenda McCoy, Sr. Title Officer, Unit Manager Page 2 of 10 Order Number: 373807 EXHIBIT A Lots 30, 31 and 32, Block 31, Buenna, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 29, records of King County, Washington; Together with that portion of the North half of vacated Fourth Street lying between the East line of said Lot 30 and the West line of said Lot 32, produced Southerly; Together with an easement for roadway over the North 10 feet of the South half of that portion of vacated Fourth Street lying between the Easterly line of Lot 8, Block 32, said Plat, and the Westerly line of Lot 16, Block 32, said Plat, produced Northerly; and Together with an easement for roadway over the South 20 feet of the North half of that portion of vacated Fourth Street lying between the Easterly line of Lot 24, Block 31, said Plat, and the Westerly ling of Lot 32, Block 31, said Plat, produced Southerly; Except that portion lying within the above described main tract. End of Schedule A Page 3 of 10 Order Number: 373807 SCHEDULE B1 There will be no standard exceptions to the Homeowner's PORCY to be issued. I. The following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. B. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. NOTE: Effective January 1, 1997, and pursuant to amendment of Washington state statutes relating to standardization of recorded documents, the following format and content requirements must be met. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder. FORMAT: Margins to be 3" on top of first page, 1" on sides and bottom, 1" on top, sides and bottom of each succeeding page. Font size of 8 points or larger and paper size of no more than 8 %z" by 14". No attachments on pages such as stapled or taped notary seals, pressure seals must be smudged. INFORMATION WHICH MUST APPEAR ON THE FIRST PAGE: Title or titles of document. If assignment or reconveyance, reference to auditor's file number or subject deed of trust. Names of grantor(s) and grantee(s) with reference to additional names on following page(s), if any. Abbreviated legal description (lot, block, plat name or section, township, range and quarter section for unplatted). Assessor's tax parcel number(s). Return address which may appear in the upper left hand 3" top margin. II. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of the satisfaction of the Company: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records, or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this commitment. B. Any policy issued pursuant hereto will contain the Exclusions From Coverage and, under Schedule B, the standard exceptions as set forth and identified as to the type of policy on the attached Schedules of Exclusions & Exceptions. End of Schedule B1 Page of 10 Order Number: 373807 SCHEDULE B2 Special Exceptions: 1. Payment of real estate excise taxes, if required. The property described herein is situated within the boundaries of local taxing authority of. City of Federal Way. Present rate of real estate excise tax as of the date herein is 1.78%. 2. General taxes and charges: 1 S` half delinquent May 1, if not paid; 2nd half delinquent November 1, if not paid. Year: 2005 Amount billed: $1,871.89 Amount paid: $935.95 Amount due: $935.94 Tax account no.: 119600-3450-01 Levy code: 1205 Assessed value of land: $78,000.00 Assessed value of improvements: $69,000.00 The matters relating to the questions of survey, rights of parties in possession, and unrecorded liens for labor and material have been cleared for the loan policy which, when issued, will contain the 100 endorsement. 4. Informational Note: The legal description in this commitment is based upon information provided with the application for title insurance and the public records as defined in the policy to issue. The parties to the forthcoming transaction must notify the title insurance company, prior to closing, if the description does not conform to their expectations. 5. Informational Note: A search of the adjacent property ownership has been made and we find no adjacent properties that are also owned by the seller. 6. There is a recorded "Manufactured Home Transfer in Location Application" or "Manufactured Home Title Elimination Application" filed under King County Recording No. 9310272270. Said manufactured home is therefore classified as real estate and the value of same will be included for title insurance coverage within the policy to issue. Page 5 of 10 Order Number: 373807 Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantor: James D. Henry and Carole J. Henry, husband and wife Trustee: Washington Administrative Services, Inc. Beneficiary: Western States Mortgage Corporation, a Washington corporation Original amount: $86,250.00, plus interest and penalties, if any Dated: February 27, 1996 Recorded: March 4, 1996 Recording No.: 9603041120 Beneficiary's interest has been assigned by successive assignments: Last assignee: Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee of EquiVantage Home Equity Loan Trust 1996-2 Recorded: November 6, 1996 Recording No.: 9611060184 The effect, if any, of an Assignment of Deed of Trust recorded under Recording 20010315000778, which purports to convey the beneficial interest under said Deed of Trust to Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee of EquiVantage Home Equity Loan Trust 1996-2 under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 1996. At the time of recordation of said Assignment, EquiVantage Inc. a Delaware corporation held no beneficial interest, of record, in said Deed of Trust. 8. The vested parties are James D. Henry and Carole J. Henry. Numerous matters of record are found against persons with similar names. The effects of these matters, if any, on the subject property cannot be determined without further information. TO DETERMINE THE EFFECTS OF THESE MATTERS, IF ANY, ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, THE VESTED PARTY MUST PROVIDE THE COMPANY WITH A PROPERLY COMPLETED IDENTITY AFFIDAVIT 5 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF RECORDING. AFTER THE COMPANY EXAMINES THE AFFIDAVIT, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WELL BE ISSUED. 9. The land described in this commitment appears to be residential in nature and may be subject to the provisions of R.C.W.6.13.060 provided the land is occupied as a homestead. If the land is occupied as a homestead, all instruments conveying or encumbering the land must be executed by each spouse, individually, or by an attorney -in -fact with specific reference to the homestead property. 10. Matters of record against the undisclosed spouse of a proposed insured. The application for title insurance fails to disclose the marital status of Chin -Sup Kim, a proposed insured; the proposed insured's interest is presumptively subject to the community interest of his or her spouse, if married. The Company has been unable to search for, and does not insure against matters, if any, against the undisclosed spouse. 11. Matters of record against the undisclosed spouse of a proposed insured. The application for title insurance fails to disclose the marital status of Mi-Young Kim, a proposed insured; the proposed insured's interest is presumptively subject to the community interest of his or her spouse, if married. The Company has been unable to search for, and does not insure against matters, if any, against the undisclosed spouse. 12. We find no pertinent matters of record against the name(s) of the proposed insured owners. Page 6 of 10 Order Number: 373807 13. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: Water District No. 56, a municipal corporation Purpose: Water mains with the necessary appurtenances Area affected: North 10 feet of the South 35 feet for a permanent water easement and the North 20 feet of the South 40 feet for a temporary construction easement Recorded: January 4, 1977 Recording No.: 7701040795 End of Schedule B2 Page 7 of 10 Order Number: 373807 Notes: A. Abbreviated Legal Description: Buenna Add, Lots 30, 31 & 32, Blk 31 B. Property Address: 29424 2nd Avenue S.W. Federal Way, Washington 98023 C. Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, telephone, gas, electricity or garbage and refuse collection. D. In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. E. Unless otherwise requested, the forms of policy to be issued in connection with this commitment will be ALTA 2003 policies, or, in the case of standard lender's coverage, the CLTA Standard Coverage Policy- 1992. The Owner's Policy will automatically include the Additional Coverage Endorsement, when applicable, at no additional charge. The Policy committed for or requested may be examined by inquiry at the office which issued the commitment. A specimen copy of the policy form(s) referred to in this commitment will be famished promptly upon request. Page 8 of 10 Order Number: 373807 . ,_�, AGL—NCY OF WASHI:NGTON PRIVACY POLICY We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with such information — particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: • information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; • Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others, and • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request information from you for your own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or services you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types ofnonpubhe personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies, or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. Page 9 of 10 Order Number: 373807 cc: John L. Scott, Inc. - Kent -Sue Lee First West Escrow-Sherrea Stephenson Chin -Sup Kim - Page 10 of 10 Order Number: 373807 4 , H LAWYERSTME 1—;� Lawyers Title Agency of Washington 2702 Colby Avenue, Everett, WA 98201 Order No_ � Z3 a)7 This sketch is provided without charge, for your information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property including, but not limited to. area, dimensions, easements, encroachments or location of boundaries. It is not a pat of, nor does it modify, the commitment/policy to which it is attached The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related. to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for finiher information 1 200,51 0C AAG8001 op 001 PR 10/05/2005 1g.25 KING COUNTY, WA RETURN TO: CHIN S KIM MI Y KIM 35350 13TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023-6974 FULL RECONAVEYANICE The undersigned, as trustee under the Deed of Trust described below, having received from the Beneficiary under said Deed of Trust, a written request to reconvey said Deed of Trust, which request recites that the obligations secured by the Deed of Trust have been fully satisfied, does hereby reconvey without warranty to the person(s) legally entitled thereto, all of the right, title and interest now held by said trustee in and to the property described in such Deed of Trust Deed of Trust Date: 11/13/2003 Recording Date: 12/18/2003 County: King State of: Washington Recording #: 20031218000128 Book NA Grantor: Chin Sup Kim And Mi Young Kim Beneficiary: Keybank N.a. Legal Description: NA As set forth in the Deed of Trust Keyl�lank USA . arc.e FIu .► . STATE OF IDAHO ) ss: COUNTY OF ADA ) Page: NA ,�t,tis�E�►r►►► 4w � A3 B I.IG 10 F S On August 24, 2005, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Darcie Huffaker, known to me to be an officer of KeyBank USA NA, the corporation that executed the foregoing Instrument as such on behalf of the corporation herein named, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same as Trustee. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: � d' -5 2�(►�`U Signature Lawyers Title .Agency of Washington Chin -Sup Kim Date: June 1, 2005 35350 13th Pl. SW File # 373807 Federal Way, Washington 98023 RE: Henry / Kim 29424 2nd Avenue S.W. Federal Way, Washington 98023 In connection with the above captioned transaction, enclosed please find the following: ❑x Commitment 19 Document Copies © Loan Policy 0 Owner's Policy 9 Other: Second Report We trust the above is satisfactory to you. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Brenda McCoy, Sr. Title Officer, Unit Manager + Ken Ewen, Title Officer Genevieve Luke, Assistant Title Officer + Rhonda Caton, Title Assistant Direct: (425) 551-5501 (425)252-1222 4 Fax: (425) 742-7972 Email: brendam@lawyerstitlewa.com • kene@lawyerstitlewa.com 1501 4`h Avenue, #308 9 Seattle, Washington 98101 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE : +30i FROM: FOR DRC MTG . ON: FILE NUMBER (s) : January 5, 2015 Ann Dower, Public Works Jim Harris NA 13-102595-00-UP & SEPA RELATED FILE NOS.: None PROJECT NAME: KIM RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ADDRESS: 29424 2ND AVE SW ZONING DISTRICT: RS 9.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed intrustions for house and driveway and associated improvements into a stream buffer. Restore and enhance on -site portion of minor stream channel and riparian setback area and residential redevelopment. Ann: Attached is Soundview Consultants Dec 22, 2014 resubmittal. Please review and provide me comments. SEPA first then Process IV Hearing Examiner review. I'll schedule a quick meeting with you on this in the next couple weeks. Attachments: • Contour Engineering TIR dated Dec 2014 + Contour Engineering Plan Set dated Dec 2014 + Soundview Consultants Technical Memo dated December 5, 2014 • Title Report ■ Site Photos Site Address: Z94Z4 Znd Ave. Sw, Federal Way, WA 96UZi Pnotograpn :L. racing iNjortn 'TV, , fir- or hl Jite Address: Lt4Z4 zna Ave. zovv, i-eaerai Way, VVA!1?5UZ,5 rriaiagrapin L. racing Cast r. A. A� RESUBM�- jED 4 DEC 2 2 2014 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Site Address: 29424 2nd Ave. SW, Federal Way. WA 98023 Phnt ph 3. Facing South CITY OF 4A Federal Way DATE: June 25, 2013 THRU; William Appleton PE, Surface Water Manager TO: Patrick Doherty, Community and Economic Development Director FROM: Jeff Woff 1 E, Surface Water Management Engineer RE: Stream Reclass Request- Stream "R" 2"d Ave. SW/SW 292"' Vic. The purpose of this memo is to respond to multiple citizen requests to evaluate the gradient characteristics of Major Stream No. "R". Based on prevailing contours documented in the City's GIS system; the longitudinal gradient of the original (but now abandoned) channel located within the city limits is approximately 11.9% between the former outfall to Puget Sound at the 5-foot elevation contour and the stream diversion intake pipe (aka- City storm pipe asset No. 15196) at elevation 73.2 feet over an approximately 573 foot length. The estimated longitudinal gradient over the steepest 50-foot length exceeds 23 % where the channel flowed over the bluff into the beach. Accordingly; please consider whether a reclassification of this stream from Major to Minor classification is justified upstream of the point where it exits the City limits within City storm pipe asset No. 15196. (This pipe outfalls into the tightlined 1"Avenue South storm system within the City of Des Moines before outfalling to Puget Sound within the City of Des Moines.) Additionally; typically insufficient depth and duration of stream flow would preclude fish passage. Please reference the attached GIS map which documents the location and gradient ofthe channel. WA Jw Attachments- GIS Map cc- Day file CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL REVISED DRC COVER SHEET DATE: June 24, 2013 TO: Ann Dower, Development Services Manager Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Jim Harris, Senior Planner ext 253 835-2652 FOR DRC MTG. ON: WEDNESDAY July 3, 2013 FILE NUMBER(s): 13-102595-00-UP 13-102596-00-SE RELATED FILE NOS.: 11-103505-AD PROJECT NAME: KIM RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ADDRESS: 29424 2ND AVE SW ZONING DISTRICT: RS 9.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Process IV Stream buffer intrusion and proposal to remove a stream from a culvert to construct a new single-family residence. LAND USE PERMITS: SEPA, Process IV Stream buffer reduction PROJECT CONTACT: SOUNDVIEW CONSULTANTS LLC RACHEAL VILLA 2907 HARBORVIEWDR Suite D Gig Harbor, WA MATERIALS SUBMITTED: SEPA Checklist Existing Site Conditions Plan, Proposed Changes Plan, Planting Plan, Impervious Surface Plan, Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan by Soundview Consultants CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 18, 2013 TO: Rick Perez, City Traffic E ngineer Will Appleton, Development Services Manager Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue Lindsey Tiroux, Public Safety Officer FROM: Jim Harris 't FOR DRC MTG. ON: DATE - Intera.1- DATE, Twith applicant FILE NUMBER(s): 13-102595-00-UP RELATED FILE NOS.: None PROJECT NAME: KIM RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ADDRESS: 29424 2ND AVE SW ZONING DISTRICT: RS 9.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Restore and enhance on -site portion of minor stream channel and riparian setback area and residential redevelopment. LAND USE PERMITS: Preliminary Plat, SEPA PROJECT CONTACT: SOUNDVIEW CONSULTANTS LLC S� 7 4G 4- RACHEALVILLA 2907HARBORVIEWDRSuiteD MATERIALS SUBMITTED: PrelimLit 97 c5 ptual drawing ADDITIONAL INFO: Not all documents have been issued to each involved party. If you would like a copy of any information involved, please contact Jim Harris O 0 W t � F U W 0.F C M8 RAV QN9 i ro V zo M zo3 N 0 N N 11-1 o z () Oda ;> va z cn wz� °O 0 �V N 0 �zV� U W W H 7 U yj F • �O 1 st Ave S F n� N aq N N Z IL 2nd Ave SW tad Ave SW s� 3rd Ave SW 3rd Ave SW ® Q M J O 4 N u � U Z L- O --------------- err 2 3 i 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1s 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 L MAR 8 2913 LESLIE �. SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF WAsHINGTON FOR I-(ING COUNTY CHIP SUP K94 and ivil YOUNG KIK husband and wife, Plaintiff, NO. 12-2-24094-9 KNT VS. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, a Municipal Corporation, I STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND DECREE QUIETING TITLE Defendant., i THIS N4ATTER conning on regularly for hearing this day in open court, Plaintiffs, Cli P SUP KIM and MI YOUNG KJM, Uis wife, being represented by their attorney of record, Robert J. Verzani, and Defendant, City of Federal Way, being represented by Peter Beckwith, Assistant City Attoniey, and said attorney having previously agreed to the entry of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Lahr, and. also agreeing to entry of this Decree and Judgment, and the court being fully advised. in the premises, Having previously entered herein its written Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Lank,, NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AI`TD DECREED as follows: 1, Judgment is entered that title in and to the following described real estate, situate ill i Federal Way, King County, Washington, to -wit: RESUBVIITfED Stipulated Indg3ament and RoBERT J. 'VRRZANI Decree Quietiu$ Titre J UN 12 NUPACYnC U3011VWAY SOUTH, SURa C FW8RA&NVAY,WA 98003 Page - l 9.1730 (253) 927-3046 CITY OF FEDERAL 11�ANA9A 1t253) 939-1941 CDS P 12-2-24094-9, KNT 2 3 a s 6 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 , 2 S The East forty (40) feet of 211a Avenue S.W, ( Platted as Fern Street) abutting and adjacent to the wo-st line of Lot 32 and extended southerly forty (40) feet to the center of S.W. 295"' Street (Platted as Fourth Street,) in Block 31 of Buenna according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 29, in Icing County, Washington on June 26, 1890. be and it hereby is quieted, as fee title interest in Plaintiffs, Clop Sup Kim and Mi Poling King, his wife, and any right, title, lien, estate or interest claimed by any other party hereto or any and all persons claiming under or through then, is subordinate to the ownership of Plaintiffs, subject only to paragraph 2., below. 2. While this action conhinis the absence of any and all interests of Federal Way In the subject property, it does not affect any private interest or easements over said property. Furthermore, if there are any public or private utility lines in the subject property, the utility in question shall retain an easement for the utility. DONE IN OPEN COURT this day of�� Presented by: Ro ert J. Verzani, W A 15 Atia .trey for Plaintiffs Approved as to Foam and for Entry Notice of Presentation Waived Peter Beckwith, WSBA 34141 Assistant City Attorney Attorney for Defendant City of Federal Way Stipulated Judgment and Decree Quiei•ing Title Page - 2 t-U7-7GL;/COURT COMMISSIONER K ti been Royer Pro T-a'df RomRT J. 'r1 ERZANI Attorney at Law 30640 PACIFIC IUGHWAV SOUT11, SUMS C FEDPRALIVAV,%VA 99003 (253) 839-1730 (253) 927.3046 FAX (253) 839-1941 40kCITY 4::tt=�P OF Federal Way RECEIVED JUN 12 2013 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8"' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 %vww .ci tyoff ed a ra l wa, APPLICATION NO(S) - 15 DD r V �oPfc.3 r Date -cJC Project Name Kim Residential Redevelopment Property Address/Location 29424 2nd Avenue Southwest Federal Way, Washington 98023 Parcel Number(s) 119600-3450 Project Description Restore and enhance onsite portion of minor stream channel and riparian setback area and residential redevelopment. PI.F,ASF. PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) X Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI ,/SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information RS9.6 Zoning Designation Single Family. High Density Comprehensive Plan Designation $23,000 Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type Construction Type Applicant Name: Chin -Sup Kim Address: 34102 13th Place Southwest City/State: Federal Way, WA Zip: 98023 Phone: 253.405.3348 Fax: 253.235.5316 Email: nadan928@yahoo.com Signature: 1_� Agent (if differe&-than Applicant) Name: Racheal Villa, Soundview Consultant LLC Address: 2907 Harborview Drive Ste D City/State: Gig Harbor WA Zip: 98335 Phone: 253.514.8952 Fax: 253.514.8954 Email: racheal@soundviewconsultants.com Signature: Owner Name: Chin -Sup Kim Address: 34102 13th Place Southwest City/State: Federal Way, WA Zip: 98023 Phone: 253.405.3348 Fax: 253.235.5316 Email: nadan928@yahoo.com Signature: Bulletin #003 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application HABITAT ASSESSMENT REPORT AND STREAM RESTORATION PLAN Kim RESIDENCE JUNE 2013 HABITAT ASSESSMENT REPORT AND STREAM RESTORATION PLAN Kim RESIDENCE JUNE 10, 2013 PROJECT LOCATION 29424 2ND AVENUE SOUTHWEST FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98023 (KING COUNTY) PREPARED FOR CHIN SUP Kim 3410213TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 PREPARED BY SOUNDVIEW CONSULTANTS LLC 2907 HARBORVIEW DRIVE GIG HARBOR, WASHINGTON 98335 (253) 514-8952 LSo u ndltTiiew coniultanti PAGE --2--OF—ly� Executive Summary Chin Sup Kim (Applicant) is proposing redevelopment of an existing residential property located at 29424 2nd Avenue Southwest in Federal Way, Washington. The project exists on one tax parcel (Parcel Number 1196003450) in the Northeast '/a of Section 06 in Township 21 North, Range 04 East W.M. in King County. The subject property was investigated for the presence of wildlife habitat and/or priority species over several dates during the Fall of 2011. The investigation identified one unnamed seasonal drainage located across the length of the west property boundary. The drainage is confined within a corrugated metal culvert under the existing driveway for approximately 65 lineal feet across the site. The stream is likely regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), and City of Federal Way. Onsite, the open portion of the unnamed drainage is a minor non -fish -bearing stream (Federal Way Municipal Code 19.05.130), which flows through residential areas to Puget Sound approximately greater than 1,100 feet downstream of the project. Functional buffers for the stream exist onsite only near the property boundaries where the drainage flows through landscaped areas. The identified seasonal stream does not likely contain sensitive plant, fish, or wildlife species on or near the site. Residential redevelopment necessitates retaining stream crossings; however, the project proposes restoring the onsite stream portion through removal of the existing culvert and replacement with two generously sized box culverts over the restored channel to provide site ingress and egress and protect stream functions. The new stream channel will provide low flow and high flow channel areas and a native riparian stream buffer within the confines of the site. Size Regulated Under Regulated Under Regulated Under Feature (on -site) Type City of Federal Way RCW 90.48 Clean Water Act Unnamed seasonal drainage 1701f Ns Yes Likely Likely EXP_.IPIT__E_ PAGE.___aL_OF 3 Y 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan i June 10, 2013 RUN "N. Lwu Site Map I 68iPLme 9Cu.E rrr I I I ll• �' t t t � w � , � I f x gin I� 7 R S ��r�r-- ��c1 LL..:.f L'4e ��• Cc51L=1i `7�G12�:. �SURVEYING.CRdBiREE MUMLLTOXINO r�ca�orarrrt�allaLmeiw ?�..• r,arW,Ra nrv: f7 r:: !a.^..: 7,90.1 ra 1a s 1 IT 1101.0001 Kim Residence Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan ii - Table of Contents Chapter1. Introduction................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter2. Proposed Project ....................................... ................................................................. 2 2.1 Project Location..................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter3. Methods......................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter4. Existing Conditions....................................................................................................... 4 4.1 Landscape Setting................................................................................................................... 4 4.2 Overview................................................................................................................................ 5 4.3 Streams................................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 5. Regulatory Requirements............................................................................................... 7 5.1 Streams................................................................................................................................... 7 5.2 Setback................................................................................................................................... 9 5.3 Management......................................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 6. Restoration and Enhancement Plan............................................................................. 12 6.1 Construction Sequencing and Best Management Practices .................................................... 12 6.2 Enhancement Actions.......................................................................................................... 12 Chapter7. References................................................................................................................... 14 Figures Figure1. Project Vicinity Map........................................................................................................................ 2 Figure 2. Aerial photograph of site Quly, 5 2012)........................................................................................ 4 Tables Table1. Stream Information Summary..........................................................................................................6 Appendices Appendix A — Methods and Tools Appendix B — Background Information Appendix C —Plant Species List Appendix D — Site Maps and Plan Sheets Appendix E — Biologist Qualifications EXPIRIT—G—, PAGE 5 ()F-R— 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants i rr Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan iii June 10, 2013 Chapter 1. Introduction Chin Sup Kim (Applicant) is proposing redevelopment to construct a new residence and associated infrastructure on a residential property located at 29424 2nd Avenue Southwest in Federal Way, Washington. The project area encompasses one tax parcel (Parcel Number 1196003450) in the Northeast '/a of Section 06 in Township 21 North, Range 04 East W.M. in King County (King County Parcel Number 1196003450). The reconstruction proposes a new single-family residence and associated infrastructure over the footprint of an existing single-family residence and ingress/egress to connect 2nd Avenue Southwest adjacent on the western site. A recent site investigation identified one unnamed seasonal drainage flowing south to north onsite between the roadway and the residence. The drainage is confined within a corrugated metal culvert for approximately 65 lineal feet across the central length of the property. This highly -modified drainage currently has issues with occasional flooding that must be addressed prior to redevelopment of the site. The proposed project requires full site redevelopment, and rather than culvert the remaining open section of the stream, the identified drainage will be daylighted and relocated to a proposed natural meander channel with gentler slopes and native plantsabove the high flow channel that will provide increased flood protection to the property and downstream areas. All proposed actions will provide a net improvement in water quality and hydrologic function of runoff in the watershed. The purpose of this habitat assessment is to identify the presence of fish and wildlife habitat, and/or priority species on or near the subject property in order to assist with the development of a stream restoration plan. This report includes conclusions and recommendations regarding: • Site description, project description, and area of assessment; • Identification and assessment of water bodies; • Identification and assessment of fish and wildlife habitat and/or priority species located within or near the proposed project; ■ Standard buffer recommendations, building setbacks, and development limitations; ■ Existing site map detailing identified critical areas and standard buffers; ■ Proposed site plan with proposed channel and culverts; • Stream restoration plan. EXH M IT PAGE OF 3 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan 1 June 10, 2013 Chapter 2. Proposed Project 2.1 Project Location The proposed project is located at 29424 2nd Avenue Southwest in Federal Way, Washington. The proposed project is situated in the Northeast '/a of Section 06 in Township 21 North, Range 04 East W.M., within King County, Washington (King County Parcel Number 1196003450). To access the site from Highway 16 - East, merge left towards I-5 N/City Center/Seattle/I-705 N, continue on I-5 N for 10.4 miles, and take exit 143 for S 320th St toward Federal Way. Turn left onto S 320'h St and proceed for 1.8 miles. Then turn right onto 1" Ave S and proceed for 1.8 miles. Then turn left onto SW 292" St and proceed for 0.1 miles. Then turn left onto 2nd Ave SW, and the site will be to the east. Fi 1. Project Picini Ma . Nattdiu ? m E � � � S 2DM'St S 2!!Ih BI Safeway T A �,p SW 2981h St I�•.'•. �D —� Approximate Site "'�'n°`" R° �nParaaa wkhvood ESch�od w F��rftY�Y h $3041113f � _ of s d a (a�r - 5 stKew ® � - SW3121h'M ::�3r2Qt5! S312bst = Federal Way RMk PAIL Qp as o e u.i: �iR cool m I � :c Source: Google, Earth EXM,I-PIT---9-- PAGE-2-OF 3 V 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan 2 June 10, 2013 Chapter 3. Methods The methods used to comply with Federal, State, and local assessment requirements are detailed below. Please see Appendix A for further details of methods and tools used to prepare the report. Streams and other potentially regulated fish and wildlife habitat within the proposed project area and within 50 feet of the subject property were identified and assessed by qualified wetland scientists and fisheries biologists over several dates in October and December of 2011. The OHW delineation was conducted according to Washington Department of Ecology guidance (Olson and Stockdale, 2008). Publicly available upstream and downstream portions of the onsite unnamed drainage were also investigated for potential habitat presence. All potentially regulated areas were inspected on multiple occasions with special emphasis given to the unnamed tributary, and additional inspections were made to publicly accessible upstream and downstream areas in order to fully characterize the stream. Maps detailing background data such as site topography and critical areas inventories are provided in Appendix B. Publicly available background data was queried for documented -wildlife observations and/or the presence of potentially regulated fish and wildlife habitat on or near the site. In addition, high - resolution aerial photography of the surrounding area was carefully examined. Visual observations using stationary and walking survey methods were utilized for both aquatic and upland habitats. Any special habitat features or signs of wildlife activity were noted for further examination. Stream channels, culverts, dams, and other features were inspected at all publicly accessible road crossings for habitat quality and potential fish barriers. Due to permitting constraints and project scope, no electroshocking methods were utilized in this investigation nor were they determined to be necessary. Existing site features were surveyed following the site investigations and assessments. The survey was conducted according to routine survey methods by Crabtree Surveying, .LLC. The locations and features of the streams are described in Chapter 4, and shown on site maps and plan sheets in Appendix D. EX1q!P1T--L- PACE OF.� 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan 3 June 10, 2013 ,51 Chapter 4. Existing Conditions 4.1 Landscape Setting The proposed project area is fully developed and contains existing impervious surfaces including a single-family residence in the center of the site and driveway that connects to 2nd Avenue Court Southwest in the northwest corner of the subject property (Figure 2). The existing driveway is situated above culverted sections of the stream. Surrounding properties contain single-family residential development. The topography of the site consists of a central topographic bench, with short, steep slopes in the southwest, southeast, and northeast property areas. The site slopes descend generally to the north with an identified minor stream channel and culverts located across the western side of the subject property. A catch basin is located offsite to the north. The drainage is confined within a corrugated metal culvert for approximately 65 lineal feet of the approximately 170 lineal feet total onsite drainage segment. Vegetated buffers exist onsite only near the property boundaries where the drainage is daylighted and runs through ornamental garden. The vegetated buffer primarily consists of rocks and non-native ornamental plants. EXG PAGE_ _ 9,...GF--- L�__ 1101.0001 Kim Residence SoundNiew Consultants LLC Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan 4 June 10, 2013 4.2 Overview The site investigation identified a seasonal stream within a culvert located in the project area (Sheet 1 of 3 in Appendix D). Topography The topography of the site consists of a central topographic bench, with short, steep slopes in the southwest, southeast, and northeast property corners. The site slopes descend generally to the northwest with an identified minor stream channel located across the western side of the subject property (Appendix B1). USFWS National Wetland Inventory The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory map shows no wetlands on or adjacent to the subject property (Appendix B2). WDFW Priority Habitats and Species The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species maps and data identify breeding area for a great blue heron colony in the vicinity of the site (Appendix B3). 4.3 Streams The recent site investigation identified one unnamed seasonal drainage located onsite. The drainage runs across the length of the west property boundary within a narrow channel of approximately less than one foot wide with predominantly mixed small cobble/gravel substrate. The drainage is confined within a corrugated metal culvert for approximately 65 lineal feet of the approximately 170 lineal feet total onsite drainage segment. The onsite stream buffer is limited and dominated by non- native ornamental species. The drainage does not appear on the King County GIS map (see Appendix B1). The unnamed drainage is a minor non -fish -bearing stream (Federal Way Municipal Code 19.05.130), which flows through residential areas to Puget Sound at an unidentified location. During the site investigation, the stream was identified originating from stormwater features servicing an upstream housing development. Downstream of the project, numerous culverts and limited access (due to private property) precluded location of the precise path of flow and mouth of the stream. Table 1 summarizes details of the stream identified on the subject property. EX14 M IT G PAGE0�..y 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants u.c Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan 5 June 10, 2013 Tnhle 1_ Stream Informatinn Summarv. STREAM INFORMATION SUMMARY — UNAMED MINOR STREAM y Stream Name Unnamed WRIA 9 WA Stream NA Catalog # Local Federal Jurisdiction Way DNR Stream Ns Type Local Stream Minor Rating Stream Buffer Width 50 feet Documented Fish Use none Location of Stream Relative to Project Stream crosses the western project area. Stream flows through residential area culverts greater than 1,100 feet downstream to the Puget Sound. Connectivity (where stream flows from/to) Upstream, flow appeared to originate through stormwater facilities servicing an upstream housing development; downstream culverts precluded identification of the path of flow. On -site stream buffer exists only near property boundaries and is dominated by non-native ornamental Riparian/Buffer Condition species. Flow is confined within a corrugated metal culvert for approximately 65 lineal feet of the approximately 170 lineal feet total onsite drainage segment; no existing buffer in this area. 4.3.2 Stream Buffers Based on the definitions and stream classification guidelines contained within the Federal Way Municipal Code Title 19.05.130 and Title 19.165.010, the proposed project area contains a minor stream which requires a 50-foot protective buffer landward from the stream's ordinary high water (OHW) once the stream is removed from the culvert. PAGE -A-OF_ 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan 6 June 10, 2013 Chapter 5. Regulatory Requirements The project proposes culvert removal and replacement of the crossing with generously sized box culverts over the restored stream channel for residential property ingress/egress. The conceptual plan is located in Appendix D and shows the proposed driveway crossing over two box culverts, each approximately fifteen feet wide to allow driveway crossing and spanning approximately nine (9) feet across the width of the restored channel area. Chapter FWRC 19.165.010 defines the setback for the stream affected by the project as all areas within 50 feet outward from the ordinary high water mark of the minor stream. Portions of the project will be located within the regulatory stream setback; therefore, discussion of the proposed intrusion into the setback and applicable code is provided below. Withcareful planning, the stream restoration standards set forth in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.165.020 (stream re -location) and 19.165.070(3) for intrusion into setbacks may be applied to this project if several criteria can be demonstrated including the project will provide improvements to water quality, habitat, and stormwater retention capability/ conveyance capacity by the stream relocation. 5.1 Streams The unnamed drainage will be removed from the dilapidated culvert and replaced to a channel with low flow and high flow allowances and a more natural meander than currently existing on site. The relocation is likely allowable under FWRC 19.165.020 Relocation. Language for this code follows: (1) Relocation of a stream on the subject property is permitted subject to all of the conditions and restrictions of this section. (2) A proposal to relocate a stream will be reviewed and decided upon using process IV in Chapter 19.70 FWIRC. (3) As part of any request under this section, the applicant must submit a stream relocation plan, prepared by a qualified professional approved by the city that shows the following. (a) The creation of a natural meander pattern. A natural meander pattern will be created in the restored channel to replace the portions of the stream located in the culvert, increase conveyance capacity, and connect the upstream and downstream channels as shown in the attached plans (Appendix D). (b) The formation ofgentle side slopes, at least two feet horztiontally to one foot vertically, and the installralion Of erosion control features for stream side slopes. The restored channel will feature gentler side slopes than the existing channel where daylighted, 'at least two feet horizontally to one foot vertically. Native vegetation will be planted after grading and excavation to reduce erosion and restore a natural riparian buffer. (c) The creation of a narrow subchannel, where feasible, against the south or west bank. The proposed channel will provide a narrow subchannel to contain low flows within a westward arc in the site's interior to provide resistance to slow high flows onsite. This feature is anticipated to reduce potential flooding onsite and to downstream areas. EI ! IT 1101.0001 Kim Residence Cnnsu F 3 Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan 7 (d) The uA6,-plion of natural materials, a vhereverpossible. The proposed actions primarily require excavation and removal of fill material. However, any new fill material will likely be sourced from on -site borrow areas in upland areas, and specialty materials such as stream bed substrates, compost, and mulch will be sourced from approved sources and will be free of pollutants and hazardous materials. (e) The use of vegetation normally associated with streams, including primariy native riparian vegetation. Native vegetation will be planted on the riparian slopes and within associated buffers, including native riparian species, wherever appropriate. See the planting plan in Appendix C for the list of proposed native plants. (fl The creation of spawning and nestitsg areas, wherever appropriate. No habitat for resident or migratory fish is identified within the stream; therefore, the creation of spawning habitat is not necessary or appropriate for the project. Potential avian nesting areas will be available in the replanted stream setback area. See the planting plan in Appendix C for the list of proposed native plants. (g) The re-establishment of the fish popNlation, wberever fens ble. No habitat for resident or migratory fish is identified within the stream; therefore, the re- establishment of the fish population is not appropriate for the project. (h) The restoration of water flow characteristics compatible with fish habitat areas, wherever feasible. No habitat for resident or migratory fish is identified within the stream; therefore, restoration of water flow characteristics compatible with fish habitat is not appropriate for the project. However, the proposed actions will provide substantial water quality and hydrologic improvements to the watershed. (i) The filling and revegetaiion of the prior channel. The existing culvert area includes portions of the proposed native plantings and the new infrastructure for the residence. See the proposed site plans provided in Appendix C. �) A proposed phasing plan specifying time ofyear for all project phases. The stream restoration is proposed concurrently with the construction of the residence and shall comply with all regulatory approved work windows, as necessary for the project. (4) The city will allow a stream to be relocated only if water gualaly, habitat and stormwater retention capability of the streams will be significantly improved by the relocation. Convenience to the applicant in order to facilitate general site design may not be considered. Water quality, habitat, and stormwater retention capability of the stream will be significantly improved by the proposed restoration plan. A large onsite portion of the drainage will be daylighted and relocated to a proposed natural meander channel with gentler slopes and native plants above the 1101.0001 Kim Residence Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan 8 LLC PAGE):6_..O1 _R _ high flow channel that will provide increased conveyance capacity, water quality functions, and habitat availability over existing conditions. Removing the flows from the metal culvert will provide an immediate water quality improvement as well as increase onsite flow capacity to resolve flooding issues. All proposed actions will provide a net improvement in water quality and hydrologic function of runoff in the watershed. (S) Prior to diverting water into the new channel, a qualified professional approved by the city shall inspect the new channel following its completion and issue a written report to the director of community development statism that the channel complies with the requirements of this section. The applicant is committed to providing a compliant project and will provide necessary documentation as required by the City. (6) The amount of flow and velocity of the stream may not be increased or decreased as the stream enters or leaves the subject property. Any effect on the amount of flow and velocity by the project will be negligible. The proposed project is not expected to significantly affect the amount of flow or velocity as the stream enters and leaves the property; the use of the proposed low flow and high flow channels will increase capacity for high flows while protecting low -flow functionality. The gradient of the stream channel will not be significantly altered. All proposed changes are anticipated to minimize potential for flooding during high flows as well as provide a net improvement in water quality and hydrologic function of runoff in the watershed. 5.2 Setback The project will remove existing impacts in the stream setback and provide improvements to the vegetation, water quality, and conveyance capacity. Compliance with FWRC 19.165.070 is discussed as follows: FWIRC 19.165.070 Intrusion into setbacks. (3) Other intrusions. Other than as specified in subsections (1) and (2) of this section, the city may approve any request to locate an improvement or et�d�e in land surface modification within stream setback areas only through process IV, based on the following criteria: (a) It will not adversely affect water quality; The proposed project is anticipated to provide substantial improvements to water quality as well as wildlife habitat and stormwater retention capabilities. A large onsite portion of the drainage will be daylighted and relocated to a proposed natural meander channel with gender slopes and native plants above the high flow channel that will provide increased flood protection, water quality, and habitat availability over existing conditions. Removing the flows from the metal culvert will provide an immediate water quality improvement as well as increase onsite flow capacity. Native vegetation will be planted on the riparian slopes to provide an improved, vegetated buffer. All proposed actions will provide a net improvement in water quality and hydrologic function of runoff in the watershed. PAGE F . -,, 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan 9 June 10, 2013 (b) It will not adversely affect the existing quality of nildlife habitat within the stream or setback area; As discussed above, the proposed project is anticipated to improve quality of wildlife habitat within the setback area and provide an improvement in water quality. (c) It will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention capabilities; As discussed above, the proposed project is anticipated to improve drainage and stormwater retention capabilities through the low flow and high flow channels designed to increase conveyance capacity and resolve existing flooding issues as shown in Appendix D. (d) It will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hatiards; The proposed project is anticipated to reduce unstable earth conditions and erosion hazards. The restored channel will feature gentler side slopes than the existing channel where daylighted, at least two (2) feet horizontally to one (1) foot vertically. Native vegetation will be planted on the stream slopes and within associated buffers, including native riparian species, wherever appropriate. See the planting plan in Appendix C for the list of proposed native plants. (e) It will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area of the subject property nor to the city as a whole, inc'livding the loss of signcant open space; and All proposed changes are -anticipated to provide a net improvement in water quality and hydrologic function in the watershed. There will be no loss of open space. 0 It is necessary for reasonable development of the subjectproperty. The proposed project is necessary for reasonable development of the subject property. The redevelopment is consistent with Federal Way code and zoning requirements and the resultant stream restoration plan will improve habitat conditions, water quality, and conveyance capacity of the existing onsite portion of the stream and associated setback. 5.3 Management The project will further comply with code requirements for land modification. The code language discussion follows: FIr/RC 19.165.080 Additional requirements for land surface modifscalion. If any land surface mod�Y'catian is permitted within the stream or stream setback area, the applicant shall comply with the following additional requirements. (1) All fill material used must be nondissolving and nondecomposing. The fill material must not contain organic or inorganic material that would be detrimental to water quality or the existing habitat. (2) The applicant may deposit dredge spoils on the subject property only if pars of an ap on the subject property. ^0 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundvie, onsuItants — Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan 10 June 10, 2013 (3) The applicant shall stabilitie all areas left exposed after land surface modification aith native vegetation normally associated vith the stream or setback area. In order to help ensure protection of the sensitive habitat and that sensitive species are not adversely impacted, the following management recommendations are provided: ■ Temporary silt fencing should be installed around . the modified buffers prior to and maintained throughout the construction period; erosion control Best Management Practices (BMP's) should be used during all land disturbing activities. ■ Confine new work, except buffer enhancement activities, to existing disturbed areas, such as existing building and garage footprints, and driveways. ■ Keep heavy equipment and vehicles out of the stream at all times. • Do not place clearing debris, yard waste, or trash within the stream buffer or on adjacent slopes; • Stormwater runoff from driveway and landscape surfaces will need to be properly treated prior to release into wedand and stream buffers. Drainage through vegetated areas, such as native planting in the buffer area, is recommended. • Infiltrate or treat, detain and disperse new runoff from surfaces into buffer; • Pesticides, herbicides, and synthetic fertilizers should not be used or stored within 150 feet of the stream, except when used in accordance with the label directions for control of noxious and/or invasive species; ■ Direct exterior lights away from the stream corridor whenever possible; ■ Place activity that generates excessive noise (i.e. generators and air conditioning equipment) away from the stream corridor; and Careful planning and targeted implementation of this stream restoration plan will help ensure that no negative impacts will be made to the critical areas identified in this assessment. Expansion of buffer areas surrounding sensitive areas and implementation of effective management measures will also help ensure that sensitive habitat will not be negatively impacted. Ex" mT PAGE --L� -U-3-L . 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants PLC Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan 11 June 10, 2013 Chapter 6. Restoration and Enhancement Plan The stream channel restoration and protective setback/buffer enhancement plan is being proposed for this project to enhance stream setback areas, using FWRC 19.165.020 stream re -location as a guide. Mitigation is proposed to enhance wildlife habitat, improve site drainage capacity and water quality. New impacts to critical areas are avoided and minimized by reducing the size of the stream crossings and improving the crossing configuration (culvert removal) to access the residence. In addition, the project proposes site redevelopment over areas with existing residential features. Stream and setback enhancement measures include removing the culvert and the non-native plant species from the stream setback areas and improving the stream setback. The stream setback will be replanted with native plants listed in the table in Appendix C, Table C1. 6.1 Construction Sequencing and Best Management Practices A pre -construction meeting will be held between the applicant, general contractors and sub- contractors, and the project biologist to discuss the project and limitations, specifically related to critical areas. Following the pre -construction meeting and prior to project commencement, temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC) measures will be implemented that consists of high -visibility fencing (HVF) installed around the critical area, silt fencing between the graded areas and modified buffers, plastic sheeting on stockpiled materials, and seeding of disturbed soils. TESC measures should be installed and actively managed for the duration of the project. Relocation of the channel will be conducted during dry conditions to the maximum extent practicable and particular care will be necessary along the west portion of the subject property to ensure the area is not significantly disturbed during project actions. A concrete wash water collection basin should be installed away from the stream prior to commencement of construction activities requiring additional concrete work. Construction materials and equipment along with all construction waste and debris should be effectively managed and stockpiled on paved surfaces and kept free of the remaining stream buffer area, and the area will need to be kept free of spills and/or hazardous materials. All fill material and road surfacing should be sourced from upland areas onsite or from approved suppliers and will need to be free of pollutants and hazardous materials. Following completion of the residence, the entire site should be cleaned and detail graded using hand tools wherever necessary, and TESC measures will need to be removed. 6.2 Enhancement Actions Enhancement actions for the stream buffer and the subject property include, but may not be limited to, the following recommendations: ■ Hand -remove where possible or pre -treat invasive plants, such as English ivy, evergreen and Himalayan Blackberry, and Scotch Broom, with a Washington Department of Agriculture approved herbicide then grub to remove the invasive plants and replant all cleared areas with native trees, shrubs, and ground covers (Appendix C); Pre-treatment of the invasive plants should occur a minimum of two weeks prior to removal; ■ Only native trees, shrubs, and groundcovers such as, listed in Appendix , ■ sed in disturbed areas to help retain soils, filter stormwater, and in,��u.--�_ macroinvertebrates (i.e. insects); PAGE �% w 1101.0001 Kim Residence !'6 Soundview Consultants cLC Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan 12 June 10, 2013 ■ An approved native seed mix will be used to seed the disturbed areas after planting trees and shrubs; ■ Maintenance to control invasive plants is recommended to occur annually, at a minimum, or more frequently if necessary. Maintenance to reduce the growth and spread of invasive plants is not restricted to chemical applications but may include hand removal, if warranted; and • Irrigation will be provided as necessary by the property owner to help ensure plant survival. 11).14 � G PAGE, CF��- 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan 13 June 10, 2013 Chapter 7. References Federal Way Revised Code, Chapter 19 Hitchcock, C.L. and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Noebwest. University of Washington Press. Seattle, Washington. Olson, P. and E. Stockdale. 2010. Determining the Ordinary High Water Mark on Streams in Wlashington State. Second Review Draft. Washington State Department of Ecology, Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program, Lacey, WA. Ecology Publication # 08-06-001. Reed, P.B. Jr. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlandr. Washington. Biological Report NERC-88/18.47 for National Wetlands Inventory, Washington, D.C. Reed, P.B. Jr. 1993. Northwest supplement (Region 9) species with a change in indicator status or added to the Northwest 1988 list, wetland plants of the state of Washington 1988. U.S. Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service WELUT - 88 (26.9), Washington, D.C. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-3. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. USFWS website: htt2:/Iwww.Rvs,gov/wetlands/) National Wetland Inventory from website. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 2013. Priority Habitats and Species hjW:/Zwdf%v.wa.gov/maWing4L hs EX"!"1T--L;- PAGE_�2d� 3'! 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan 14 June 10, 2013 Appendix A Methods and Tools Table A-1. Methods and tools used to prepare the report. Parameter Method or Tool Website Reference Stream Delineation Federal Ordinary High Water Mark Definition % v c •s Congressional Federal Register 33 Part 328.3 Definition of Waters of the United States. Olson, P. and E. Stockdale. 2010. Determining the Ordinary High Water Mark on Streams in Washington State. Second Review Draft. Washington State Department of Ecology, Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program Lacey, WA. Ecology Publication # 08-06-001. i1t-201l-tidr33-vn131 nr f/C11k- 2011-tit163-vn1.3- ec32►±-3.ndf Second Review Draft State Ordinary High Water Mark Protocol htm:ll� w��w.r seva Y.bs/0811 O60 l.pdf Stream Classification Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Water Typing System Forest Practices Water Twin Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 222-16-030. DNR Water typing system hhrM/Im-ww.dnr.ua.goy- IBusinessi' ennits/-1'rmiGs/i+arestPnietieesrinT licadorss/Papeg/F ware m S WAC 22216-030 hhrgi:l1a!/agp�.p.nn _gnvIWA(:/defa 1 6.03 Water Typr Mappj= htQ2; /Ifortress.wa.gorl�1IlW1� f rr=L1J hvcr.htm Federal Way Revised Code http://www.codepubEshing.com/ WA/FederalWay/ Federal Way Revised Code Title 19.165 Plant Names USDA Plant Database hr�,:11 s:usda.prn•/ Website Washington Priority Habitats and Species v v s sc rya dogWebsite /phs/maps data/ USFWS species lists by County htmalrucu•_f«1;nrlrnJ�� nc crcdl Website ?s8fid-11276103 2793&s8fi� = 1127 fi? 573903&cnupl},iwnme=Pierce+ f; nun WDFW GIS Data w •s. r Website /nhs/maps data/ Report Preparation Federal Way Revised Code http://www.codepublishing.com/ WA/FederalWay/ Federal Way Revised Code Tide 19 IT � 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants u.c Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan June 10, 2013 Appendix B Background Information This Appendix includes a King County Topographic Map (B1), USFWS National Wetland Inventory map (B2), and WDFW Priority Habitats and Species Report (B3). 1101.0001 Kim Residence Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan PAGE.-GF-.... Soundview Consultants LLC June 10, 2013 Appendix B1. King County Topographic Map 1101.0001 Kim Residence Sriu w IMn Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan P E ' ua . — .,� Appendix N EH MIT pAG E 23_..� 1101'0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan June 10, 2013 Appendix C Plant Species List This appendix includes a table with recommended plant species (Cl) for the critical area buffer enhancement plan. (Alternative native plants may also be used with biologist's approval). Table C1. Enhancement Plan Plant List — Replacement Plants'. Name Form & Habit Comments Trees Sitka spruce Evergreen tree; in Very vigorous, broadly conical conifer. Is good on an (Picea sitchensis) damp locations. exposed or poor site. Produces white flowers and red fruit that are eaten by small Bitter cherry Deciduous tree; moist mammals, rodents, and various birds and used in forested (Pmnus emaiginata) forest and along riparian buffers to help reduce stream bank erosion, protect t streams. aquatic environments, enhance wildlife, and increase t biodiversity. (h:llnlants usd�,g�(j Cone bearing evergreen is adapted to a wide variety of soils in terms of texture, butreaches its best development on clay loams, silty clay loams, and silt loams which are deep, moist, and well drained. The seed of Douglas -fir is an important Douglas fir Evergreen tree' food for chickadees, red crossbill, finches (house and (Pseudotsuga extremely dry sites. purple), evening grosbeak, Douglas squirrel, Townsend menziesii) chipmunk, deer, meadow mice, shrews, and many other birds and mammals. The needles are an important source of food of blue and spruce grouses. Mountain beaver, deer, elk, and rabbits eat foliage and twigs within their reach. :� rglaa ts.0 sd a. ov /) Deciduous tree; moist Produces white to pink flowers and yellowish to red fruit, Pacific crabapple woods, swamps, edges small egg -shaped apples. Edible but tart. Provides nesting sites for birds, and shelter for birds and other wildlife. Fruits (Malus fusea) of standing and are eaten by birds, squirrels, elk, and deer. Foliage and twigs flowing water. are browsed by deer and elk. (ht�jZplants_ssla_g Ir )) Cone bearing evergreen used in forested riparian buffers to help reduce stream bank erosion, protect aquatic Western Hemlock Evergreen tree; fairly environments, enhance wildlife, and increase biodiversity (Tsuga hetemphy,&) dry to wet sites. providing cover and habitat for many wildlife species and small mammals. It is also used for nest trees by cavity 1 nesting birds. (gip://Wants.usdLeavl_] Cone bearing evergreen deer browse it all year along the Western Red Cedar Evergreen tree; moist coast occurring on various substrates, commonly on moist (Thuja plicata) to wet soils. sites (swamps, wet ravines, poorly drained depressions. lants.us Shrubs/Emergents Black Twinberry Deciduous shrub; Produces yellow twin flowers and black twin berries; some (Lonicem involuerata) does not spread success reported from cuttings Evergreen Huckleberry Evergreen shrub; does Attractive but slow growing; difficult to establish; tolerates (Vacctnium ovatum) not spread salt spray Hooker Willow Deciduous shrub; A horticultural variety, "Clatsop," has be V 1101.0001 Kim Residence 0A(4% �sundti ons 2 y Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan Eea aa�! (Salix hooketiana) does not spread I Soil Conservation Service for its vigor, disease resistance & attractive foliage; salt spray tolerant Male and female flowers are on separate plants; only female Indian Plum Deciduous shrub; spreads by (Oifo a underground stems to flowers produce the attractive "plums" cerasifotmis) form open stands Deciduous fern; needs Lady fern shade and organic, moist soil. Propagates Dainty, lance -shaped, much -divided, arching fronds are pale (Athyrlum feRx- by spores in late green. femina) summer or by division in autumn or winter. Deciduous shrub; Thickets of spring stems create a formidable barrier; Nootka Rose spreads by produces attractive, pink flowers followed by large, red hips; (Rosa nutkana) underground runners tolerates salt spray to form thickets Ocean Spray Deciduous shrub; does not always Produces attractive sprays of creamy -white flowers; will root (Holodiseus discolor) spread aggressively spread Oregon grape A short, erect, unbranched evergreen shrub seldom over 3 feet tall with small (3/16 inch), dark blue berries, edible, but Evergreen shrub; does (Mahonia nervosa) not spread sour Red Currant Deciduous shrub; One of our finest ornamental natives; produces clusters of (Ribes sanquineum) does not spread white to red flowers Red Elderberry Deciduous shrub; Produces red, non -edible berries; some success reported (Sambueus racemosa) does not spread from woody cuttings Red -Osier Dogwood (Comus strvloahkn or Deciduous shrub; Attractive shrub that produces bright red stems Comus S&dces) does not spread Evergreen shrub; Salal spreads by Widely available; difficult to establish; slow growing; (Gaulthetia shallon) underground runners tolerates salt spray to form thickets Deciduous shrub; Salmonberry spreads by Spreads quickly once established; berries provide food for a (Rebus spectabilis) underground runners variety of songbirds to form thickets Seouler Willow Deciduous tree or Of the willows listed here, this species tolerates the driest (Salix seouk ana) shrub; does not spread conditions Sedge; growing in beds or colonies from Slough sedge Grows abundantly in wet, often saline habitat such as (Carex obnupta) rhizome networks wetlands Snowberry Deciduous shrub; spreads by Tolerates high winds and often grows on vegetated slopes S hotiea ( � P os underground runners overlooking salt water albus) to form thickets Sword fern Semi -evergreen fern; Does best in semi -shade and moist but well drained soil 1 (Polystichum propagate by division enriched with fibrous organic matter munitum) in spring or spores in 1101.0001 Kim Residence Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan G ouddymm, Co 1 PAGE °c;- 1 summer Deciduous shrub; Thimbleberry spreads by May be difficult to find in some native plant nurseries 1(Rubus parvi9orus) underground runners to form thickets Vine Vine Maple Maple Deciduous shrub; does not always Large specimens widely available; spreads by root and seed natum) (Acspread aggressively Annual and perennial Woody plant seeds also available (success typically low); very Native Plant Seed grass and foxb mixes slow to establish; avoid exotic commercial mixes; seed mixes Mixes available typically used in conjunction with other vegetation plantings; typically short-term erosion control technique 1. Final nlant cPle.rrinn and quantity to be verified by the nroiect scientist. Native plant substitutions may be acceptable with the project scientist's approval. E H!IRIT PA GE 22F-2 Y. 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants r i c Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan June 10, 2013 Appendix I] Site Maps and Plan Sheets This Appendix includes the project site plan maps showing the existing features of the site, the proposed features of the site, and the proposed planting plan. EXHIPIT--G.- PRGE-It-OF�Y- 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants LLC Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan June 10, 2013 KIM - EXIS'LlNG SITE CONDITIONS g ca U N _ �� I11.� ■ of I 1 I I I I i i J i NO'56'38"E 170.00' J 1 'A8' N E.XISTIN SHED 0 Lo 3 N O U co m z � � r Yam,. 2ND AVENUE S.W. p4. J 15g I 742' [ 3I 1 1 I j I I OME I Is4' I 'SO. I 1 a f O N N f\ cn Go I Aso SO'56'38°W 170.00' ��4p �no PpRO7CIMATExISTING RIVEWAYANDPARKING EXISTING , REA LOCATION SHED STORMWATER OUTFALL NELEV 144 FT WALL � _ o �� tf SO'56'38"W 170.00' U Q M WZ ro E L3J� WM� f�7, T QCC t �3N Z UC/7 ^ 6.s d � U 0 N - �1 Ln 7 Cl - Cl oo _ v �� _ � N N � V O � _ ti] r C ' y a o O w V '^ N EXHMIT PAGE�.�p�� o r-, 0 g M O W Q N P-4 z Nw� z wz V N DATE: 6/11/2013 JOB: 1101.0001 BY: JR scALE: 1" = 20' SHEET 1 OF 4 KIM - PROPOSED CHANGES a �} a a � o . M O 00 Z STORM WATER OUTLET RAISE TO 128' WITH BIRDCAGE & CATCH BASIN ''f ` \ _ - _---------- NO'56'38"E 170.00' k i , 5 M1•� SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ' 156' — APPROX. 45-0" X 100'-0" t t \ \ 1 ,54' _ ,J clj \ \ 1 1 � 1 ' w 0 6 0 � V - =-:—r — — —I— — — — - � N M I I � O 2ND AVENUE S.W. .� SO'56'38"W 170.00* 7 ._.. BOX CULVERT SO'56'38"W 170.00' - - 1 I ' -7 d 1 a .tee•----__ I 1 0 1 TORMWATER OUTFALL -ELEV 144 FT ExllMi M Amy �.-..._ WZ_ M E W W ^ u M � �L. j yrn� c � r QQ� siN Z n^ Np d u U d' N C 7 ,n ON 000 00 0 C - -4 a� In 1+1 v cq � N � N N _ - �1 U V .i �cl � y \1 w c c U M U r G o i o � �z�w � � z N Q ice- V C7� DATE: 6/11/2013 JOB: 1101.0001 BY: JR SCALE: 1" = 20' SHEET 2 OF 4 KIM - PLANTING PLAN vMWE Fj Ti" •R �Q 1�� "1• Y V5/' f • : " "• t., X rp :} All i I ►� r I�MM rig �►��; :tie � �� APPROXIMATE PLANTING LAYOUT SCALE: 1" = 20' PLANT LIST TYPICAL SYMBOL SPECIES NAME COMMON NAME QUANTITY (APPROX.) SIZE (GAL) SPACING (FT O.C.) TREES .� ° • Prunus emarginata BITTER CHERRY 5 2 10 Picea stichensis SITKA SPRUCE 3 2 10 = Thuja plicata WESTERN RED 4 2 10 — CEDAR t�: SHRUBS AND PLANTS Acercircinatum VINE MAPLE 4 1 10 Ribes sanquineum RED CURRANT 19 1 5 Rosa nutkana NOOTKA ROSE 42 1 5 Vaccinium ovatum EVERGREEN 22 1 5 HUCKLEBERRY Gaultheria shallon SALAL 46 1 5 Mahonia nervosa OREGON GRAPE 26 1 5 ® Athyrium filix-femina LADY FERN 75 1 1/2 Polystichum munitum SWORD FERN 26 1 5 Carex obnupta SLOUGH SEDGE 227 1 1/2 LOCATOR LATH (IF SPECIFIEI 3 to 4 INCH LAYER OF MULCH NOTES: • PLANT SHRUBS OF THE SAME SPECIES IN GROUPS OF 3 to 5. • EXCAVATE PIT TO FULL DEPTH OF ROOT MASS AND CANOPY DIAMETER. SPREAD ROOTS TO FULL WIDTH OF CANOPY. • MIDWAY THROUGH PLANTING ADD AGROFORM TABLET AND WATER THOROUGHLY. • BACKFILL TO BE COMPACTED USING WATER ONLY. • WATER IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE STAKES OPTIONAL. TO BE USED AT DISCRETION OF PROJECT BIOLOGIST, 3" DEEP SAUCER FOR WATER REMOVE ALL TIES, WRAPS & CONTAINERS. FREE PERIMETER ROOTS FROM NURSERY BALL. EXCAVATE TREE PIT AT A MIN. / OF 4 TIMES DIA. OF ROOTBALL fI AT BALL CENTER, TAPERING PIT ` N\ , GRADE TO FINISH GRADE. PIT SOILS, NURSERY BALL WASTE BACKFILL e . SET BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE, OR COMPACTED SOIL. NOTE' WORK PERIMETER ROOTS FREE OF NURSERY BALL & SPREAD OVER EXCAVATED PIT TO BE COARSELY SCARIFIED. �S`�►, T TREE PLANTING DETAIL P _- W NOT TO SCALE N C-D WZ M E W N 00 c QR� v3N t I ' n rN a a - .rj E 44 �n �n = CAI N J o r v - M m W _ o w � � t. h u i r 0 O a o r O NL �c I" 0 ui z � � ��C �Q� o o F w p 0 c Q DATE: 6/11/2013 dos: 1101.0001 Y-M/Ix scALE: 2AS NOTED FSHEET J of 4 KIM - DETAIL A a a WZ M E cu ao ? • , a M rN = u Q U d' 7 O N c -44 m v N N cl r w o r " v u Ln L ? M W w b h U = a11{{ r U C' o b � o o N o � � r o �z3w ��z o 8 N � z rt � � 7n Y. 138' 136' 134' -RETAINING WALL--� LQG WEIR - CROSS-SECTION A - 132 LOG WEIR $TORMWATER OUTLET ❑pnn7f CULVERT r DeTE: 6/11/2013 JOB: 1101.0001 KIM - iMPERVIOUS SURFACES 132'---^----- fJ�.. E.XISTlP SH EC 0 3 T cq _ N -- - rn p 00 z 126' J 1 1 A 0 o 2ND AVENUE S.W. 3 0 i & 1 I i 1 I I NO'56'38"E 170.00' 7 1 1 I 156' i 1 1 EX;STINO WANUFAOTURED HOME �s¢• (8,679 SF) ONSITE ! 796' g IMPERVIOUS SURFACES , 1 AFTER CHANGES �Q 1 N N Q i CD Go SO'56'38"W 170.00' 7q�= N so (5,645 SF) QNSITE IMPERVIOUS SURFACES BEFORE CHANGES NG {RF-TAiNING WALE E�S� -- _ SO'56'38"W 170.00' SHED TORMWATER OU1TALL NELEV 144 FT fig. L EXH MIT -_, o n 3 PA GE G� 7 t— N fJ�.. E.XISTlP SH EC 0 3 T cq _ N -- - rn p 00 z 126' J 1 1 A 0 o 2ND AVENUE S.W. 3 0 i & 1 I i 1 I I NO'56'38"E 170.00' 7 1 1 I 156' i 1 1 EX;STINO WANUFAOTURED HOME �s¢• (8,679 SF) ONSITE ! 796' g IMPERVIOUS SURFACES , 1 AFTER CHANGES �Q 1 N N Q i CD Go SO'56'38"W 170.00' 7q�= N so (5,645 SF) QNSITE IMPERVIOUS SURFACES BEFORE CHANGES NG {RF-TAiNING WALE E�S� -- _ SO'56'38"W 170.00' SHED TORMWATER OU1TALL NELEV 144 FT fig. L EXH MIT -_, o n 3 PA GE G� 7 t— N C.' W W1^9� V Lj ._ Q om' ---I _cc. �3Nz C= CU CIO oan� M N (a E d V U fit 0 C u N � r1 � ib o o U L a N N `] C U U b O ^, 1�lj u o 7 Ft ai U � � W •j W .� m � � 7. Ell�a°0 C 0 w CUC _ o N C7 LJ C U o � o � o � o aJ z N Q 0 O w N w 0 z DATE:6/11/2013 JOB: 1101.0001 BY: JR scALE: 1" = 20' SHEET 1 OF 1 Appendix E Biologist Qualifications All field inspections, jurisdictional wetland boundary delineations, OHWM determinations, habitat assessments, and supporting documentation, including this Habitat Assessment and Stream li'.estorsdon Plan prepared for the Kim Proj2ertTvwere prepared by, or under 11 the direction of, Racheal Villa of Soundview Consultants 7C. Racheal Villa Fisheries Biologist Racheal Villa is a professional fisheries biologist with a diverse background in both fresh water and marine ecology with emphasis in salmonid life histories and habitat. She has experience in assessing marine, shoreline, stream, and wetland systems, reporting on biological evaluations, permitting, and site assessments. Racheal earned a Bachelor's of Science degree in Fisheries Biology from the University of Washington, Seattle, with additional graduate level training in salmonid behavior and life history; restoration of fish communities and habitats in river ecosystems; biological problems with water pollution; and biomonitoring and assessment. In addition, she has received formal training from the Washington State Department of Ecology in Compensatory Mitigation and Restoration Projects, Determining the Ordinary High Water Mark, the revised Washington State Wetland Rating System, Selecting Wetland Mitigation Sites Using a Watershed Approach, and Biological Assessment Preparation for Transportation Projects from the Washington State Department of Transportation. She is also a Pierce County qualified Fisheries Biologist and a WSDOT qualified Senior Author for Biological Assessments. Racheal Villa Soundview Consultants LLC 2907 Harborview Drive Gig Harbor, WA 98335 (253) 514-8952 Office (253) 514-8954 Fax racheal@soundviewconsultants.com Date 6/10/2013 EXr 1i R1T---G-- PAGE — y 0F.V 1101.0001 Kim Residence Soundview Consultants u.c Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan June 10, 2013 N W E S VICINITY MAP 29424 2nd Ave SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 This map displays the surrounding area of the Kim Process TV Stream Buffer Intrusion Request located at 29424 2nd Ave SW in Federal Way, WA. This map was created July 6, 2015. Doc ID 69270 KIM RESIDENCE GRAPHIC SCALE G A PORTION OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M. D za Ao CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1 INCH = 20 FEET (22"04") COVER SHEET / TESC PLAN 1 INCH = 40 FEET (11" K37") APPLICANT TRENCH NOTES SITE PLAN NOTES CHIN -SUP KIM IF WORHERS ENTER Ja'EY TRENCH OR OTHER EXCAVATION r 7 EARTHWORK UANTiTIES 1. PROPOSED FEATURES AND STRUCTURE LOCATIONS ARE BASED ON FILL SPECIFICATION 34102 13TH PLACE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 FOUR OR MQRS F1IEY IN OEM THAT DOES NOT MEET THE pPE11 PIT REQUIROAETETS OF 1M.A7QT SECTION 2-fl9.3(3]B, K aJALI. 8E SHORED ANO CR+BBER. THE OOHTRACYOR IS ALONE TOTAL CUT = 1180f CY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT. 2 FILL MATERIAL SHALL NOT CONTAIN PETRQUWM PRODUCTS, OR SURSTARCES WHICHI ARE RAZARIDOM DANGEROUS. TOXIC OR CIVIL ENGINEER RESPONS BIE FOR WORKER SAFETY. ALL TRENCH SAFETY 5Y51EL1S SIA37. MEEr THE REQUGtEMEPITS OF THE TOTAL FILL = 866L CY NET = 320t CY CUT 3 I WHICEH OTHEAWHSE MOLATE ANY STATE. FEDERAL. OR LOCAL LAW OIm1NANCE CODE-i - CONTOUR ENGINEERING LLC 3309 561H ST EE STE. 106 WA9IP1Gi0Pl IMDVSIRIAL SAFETY AIHD HEALTH ACT, CHAPTER CALCULATION ONLY. FGEJERATED � ONLY EARTH MATERIAL SHALL BE Po.+1C£U Yi FRi`+ GIG HARBOR, WA 98335 49.77 RCP. NUMBERSTHIS SHOW ARE A M FlIM� AND (253) 857-5454 TO THE BISTHO GROUND PROVIDED BY TIE SURVEY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DO THEIR OW CALCULATION BASED ON THE NEORMAnM TOPOGRAPHIC NOTE SURVEYOR TOPOGRAPHIC NOTE PROVIDED WITHIN THESE PLANS. THE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC AND PARCEL DATA SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS UTILITY NOTES CRABTREE SURVEYING LLC. 7328 104TH STE PUYALLUP, WA 98373 PUYAL32-9591 THE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC AND PARCEL DATA SHOWN ON IN PART, THESE DRAWINGS HAS BEEN PREPARED. IN PART, BASED THE QUANTITIES MAY VARY BASED ON THE FOLLOWNG FACTORS. 1. SHRuiX�S'Ar3L DF E1"SriNG SUSS HAS BEEN PREPARED, IN PART, BASED UPON INFORMATION FURNISHED BY THE SURVEYOR (CRABTREE SURVEYING, LLC.). WHILE THIS INFORMATION IS ENGINEERING LLC CANNOT ENSURE ITS OBTAINS UTILITY ZEST MATIONAVAILABLE DEPICTED S THESE 11ME WAS DETAINED FROM HEST SOURCES 1N TIME OF FOR THE UPON INFORMATION FURNISHED BY THE CRABT'R86 SUftVEYfAIC LW, 1. WHILE THIS INFORMATION 2 VARIANCES OF VEGETAROH THIME55 AND UNSUITABLE TOPSOIL 3 SUBBASE wnlp�yENTS FOR THE BUILDING FOUNDATION BASED ON BELIEVED RELIABLE, CONTOUR ACCURACY AND THUS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR T}EE ACCURACY (� THAT SHALL BE S RESOCA CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RNspDNawr RELOCATION OF ETasnNG UNDERGROINHD CONFLICTING UTILITIES j SITE . rmne x.. o sID-6 •°"'I. ENVIRONMENTAL Is BEUEVEO RELIABLE. CQMWA EW4N86RINC LLC FINAL STRUCTURAL DESIGN INFORMATION OR FOR ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS WHICH MAY HA oDPICTETI OR NOT I>rPlerLv ON THESE PLANS VICINITY MAP SO OMEW CONSULTANTS CANNOT ENSURE ITS ACCURACY AND THUS IS NOT 4. TRENCHING EXCAVATION FOR PROPOSED UTILITIES INCORPORATED INTO THESE DRAWINGS AS A RESULT, 2907 HARBORMEW DRIVE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OF THAT INFORMATION OR NOT TO SCALE GIG HARBOR, WA 98RIV FOR ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS WHICH MAY HAVE BEEF! INCORPORATED INTO THESE ORAWINCS AS A RESULT, (253) 514-8952 TESC LEGEND ® • ^ _ •• - +.: _ CLEARING/GRADING/DISTURBED _CONTRACTOR TESC NOTES rn LIMITS I. ADDITIONAL SILTATION FENCE AND ANY OTHER TESC MEASURES SMALL BE INSTALLED AS NEEDED AS y SITE CONDITIONS WARRANT OR PER CITY INSPECTOR. 2. NO TRACKING OF DIRT OR MUD M ALLOYIEO ONTO THE CITY OR COUNTY ROAD. ROADWAY SHALL BE p,0 O FILTER FABRIC FENCE SWEPT IF THIS OMRS OR AS NEEDED. A V64M WASH MAT OEM TO 8E 'NSTALLED AS CONDITION'E��S G 1 �S j X- SEE DETAIL WARRANT. •F 3 A03ACENT PROPERTIES, PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYS AND CRITICAL AREAS AND BUFFERS SHALL BE i+�5 C3 PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SEOIMFNYATION OF THE PROJECY CONSTRUCTIO� ENTRANCE - ® SEE DETAIL(j) PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES 3 I. ALL EXPOSED SLOPES SHALL BE SEEDER AFTER CONSTRICTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED. SILT OFENCE SHALL REMAIN FOR A MINIMUM OF 30 DAYS AFTER THE FINAL STABILIZATIGN OF THE DEMO h REMOVE. SEE CONTRACTOR NOTES SLOPES HAS OCCURRED. 2. DRIVEWAY SHALL HAVE ALL WEATHER SURFACE. YS A FINAL w 0 Z O a N 0 o N w rc Ij N N m JZ Zyt a m o+ Z 0 ^ U7 = rnn l7 $ W rn z W g;r`%mw Z SAi LL a 2 I iii rn ,6. 3. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SMP S SHALL BE REMOVED 30 DA -.E1EB R = 25' MIN. Vr INLET PROTECTION STA91UZATION HAS OCCURRED E SEE DETAIL C3 (6, MIN. DEPTH LLj W v Y r (6"MIN. FOR RESIDENTIAL ZLLI IIn o, A 1` l� c�r1l 1r-r•7 SEQUENCE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS) tA• �� = `I ' 1y CONS U LION E UENCE 4" TO 6' QUARRY. SPALL 1`' W �'�+' 'o v 1. OBTAIN REQLRREL PERMITS AND HALO APRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE CITY. (4' TO 6" FOR RESIDENTIAL l r A 2. POTHOLE ANY EXISTING UTILITIES FOR VERIFICATION OF DEPTH AND LOCATION. SEE TESC NOTES SINGLE FAMILY LOTS) Lu f Nyoro3'2Yw 75.D0' VERIFICATION NOTE- EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION PLAN SHOWY! ARE 3. ESTABLISH CLEARING AND GRADING LIMITS AND INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. THE B0.57C MEASURES FOR THE PROJECT SITE. PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/EGRESS ARE L�-I a 4. INSTALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER ETHOSIDN CONTROL MEASURES As NEEDED. ADDITIONAL BMPS AND MEASURES SHAD• BE 7 qs 5. SCHEDULE AN EROSION CONTROL INSPECTION WITH THE CITY," -r,r.• ,V \ ' I 7 •r - '•1 1 6. GRADE SETS PER PLAN, RE -GRAD CHANNEL PER WETLAND BIOLOGIST PLAN AND INSTALL EMPLOYED AS REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT CESCL, _ INSpEOTax OR AS FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Y .-✓ 1 CULVERT. 1 NOT TO SCALE 7. CONSTRUCT HOUSE, DRIVEWAY, AND REMAINDER OF IMPROVEMENTS ADDITIONAL MEASURES AND MODIFICATIONS TO R�eY F. y9 8. ESTABLISH DISPERSION AND FLOWPATH AREAS PER PLAN. RETAIN NATIVE VEGETATION AS TaE TESC PLAN SHALL BE LOGGED WITHIN THE �+� ENTRANCE fior \ IT T: / % '1 MUCH AS POSSIBLE. SITE SWPPP DOCUMENT. CONSTRUCTION lON EtY 1 EV"1NCE NOTES 9. STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOILS T MATERIAL SHALL BE 47 TO B' QUARRY SPALLS ( 4 TO 6 INCH FOR RESIDENTIAL , 10. ARRANGE FINAL ENSPECTION WITH THE CITY. 1 I I I J r 1 11. SILT FENCE AND OTHER APPLICABLE TESC MEASURES TO REMAIN UNTIL THE SITE IS SINGLE FAMILY LOTS) AND MAY BE TOP -DRESSED WITH 1 INCH TO 3 INCH ROCK. R•'A STABILIZED TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY INSPECTOR Z THE ROCK PAD $HALL BE AT LEAST 12• THICK AND 5V LONG( 20 FEET FOR �' o- 12, REMOVE TESC MEASURES WHEN ALLOWED BY CITY INSPECTOR VTES LESS THAN 1 ACRE OF DISRIRBEO SOIL) WIDTH SHALL BE FULL WIDTH OF ram .. �. \ �-1 \ ` •r l•� 1 INGRESS AND EGRESS AREA. SMALLER PADS MAY BE APPROVED FOR OVAL DISPERSION NOTES SJWGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL SITES. :. \ x 3 ADDITIONAL ROCK SHALL BE ADDED PERIODICALLY TO MAINTAIN FUNCTION OF THE - 1 1. DISPERSION SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED VIA A DISPERSION TRENCH. Y 2. THE 03SPERSION TRENCH SHALL BE PLACED AT THE NOTED LOCATION. A 25-FT LONG PAD. z HA '; \ 1 iT1 (MIN.) VEGETATIVE FLOWPATH FOR EACH TRENCH SHALL BE PRESERVED IN ITS NATIVE a. IF THE PAQ DOES HOT ADEQUATELY ROADIE MUD FROM THE VEHICLE WHEELS• V ,y `� i 1Il 4l STATE AND/OR APPROPRIATELY RE-VEGATETEO AND MAINTAINED AS SUCH. SHE WHEELS SHALL 6E HOSED OFT' WORE THE 0OV FED WITH A PAVED � r1 1 yJ• \ 1 r 3. DISPERSION TRENCHES SHALL BE 2.75-FT HIQE. APPROXIMATELY 3.5-FT DEEP AND STREET.THE WASHING SHALL Elf DONE QFI AN AREA pOVEREO W17H CRUSHED d I ROCK AND WASH WATER SHALL DRAIN TO A SEDIMENT RETENTION FACILITY OR LENGTH AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ALL TRENCHES SHALL HAVE GRADED NOTCHED BOARDS THROUGH A SILT FENCE. � � i { AT OUTLET WIDTH OF TRENCK. THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE TRENCH SHALL BELu „N l� 11'I I CONSTRUCTED SO ID MAINTAIN A CONSTANT ELEVATION PER PLAN. SEE DETAIL 4 ON SEEDING NOTES SHEET C3. ~ 4• DISPERSION WPATH AREAS CANLn NOT OVERLAP ANY SEPTIC SYSTEM OR ORAINFIELDS, I, stm 9w10E AS BF10W AND SHALL BE APPLIED AT THE RATE RECOMMENDED BY v } l I i 1 ! 5. THE FLOWPATH FOR THE DISPERSION TRENCH MUST HAVE A SLOPS THAT DOESOR ANY WELL& NOT GERWHAnoN REDTDP (ACROSTS ALBA7 10 PERCENT z N ui a,• '- ` 1 1 I J EXCEED 20 IF AN AREA CAN NOT BE FOUND ONSITE TO MEET THIS CONDITION, A - �o +1+ 1 i r � FLAW D 2 15IF HEW TO BE RE -GRADED AND PLANTED WITH NATIVE VEGETATION. ANNUAL RtiF (�^"'u 40 PERCENT � r jj I C I 1 1 1 I• 1 I 6. ROOF AREAS SHALL BE ROUTED TO DISPERSION FEATURES AS SHOWN CHEWING PT:saE �dS.OLULIITA}A) (•'AMESrowN. _ a I MANNER SHOQ,Qy', OR KOKEn 40 PER �. Q eT' _ , r /' PLASTIC COVERING NOTES WHITE DUTCH CLOVER (TRIF i� 1a PERCENT w g a } a • ( r -p F T 1. PLASTIC SHEETING SHALL KA1i A MNIMUM THICKNESS OF 6 MILS AHD SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF IKE STALE 2. MAIN BIDS E AS NE BETWEEN MAY 1 AND OCTOBOT 31 THE REWIRE IRRIGATION AND OTHER � ^ ^Y � R4 STANDARD SPECIRCAi1C1HS SECTFON 9-14.FJ- MAINTENANCE AS NECY$RY TO FOSTER AND PROTECT THE ROOT STRUCTURE LL IIJ U Sr�l j J 2. COVERING SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED TIGF3TLY IN PLACE BY USING SANDBAGS OR TIRES ON ROPES WITH A 3. FOR SEED BEDS PLANTED BETWEEN OGYOBOI 31 AND APRIL 30, ARMORING OF THE SEED BED �• .'k MAAMUM 10-FOOT GRID SPACING IN ALL DIRECTIONS. ALL SEAMS SHALL 6E TAPED OR WEIGHTED DOWN FULL LENGTH WILL BE NECESSARY. (Ea. OEOTI"LCi JUTE MAT, CLEAR PLASTIC COVERING). V I N CC �. •/ _ AND TIMERS SHALL BE A LEAST A l2 ACHE OVERLAP OF ALL SEAMS. CLEAR PLASTIC COVERING SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ON AREAS SEEDED BETWEEN HOVE6HBEft 1 RPID MARCH 31 4- BEFORE SEEDING. INSTALL NEEDED SURFACE RUNOFF CONTROL MEASURES SUCH AS GRADIENT OF FA AY . f r .,:�•n;>., - _ i • ' , AND REMAIN UNTIL YECETAilON IS FIRMLY ESTABUSHE7?. TERRACE$ INTERCEPTOR DIKES. SWAES LEVEL SPREADERS AND SEDIMENT BASINS. I ,- \ 1 . • .- J ,- ^% J� r• 4. WHEN THE COVERING IS USED ON UN^SEEDET7 SLOPES. IT SHALL BE KEPT W PLACE UNTIL THE NEXT SEEDING PERiOO� 5. THE SEEDBED SHALL BE FIRM N1TH A FAIRY FINE SUR:ACE, FOLLpWES SURFACE ` I'Y/ `.I- PLASTIC COiIEflING SHEETS 9HH.1. BE BURIED TWO FEET AT THE TOP Cf SLOPES IN ORDER TO PREVENT SURFACE ROUGHENING PERFORM ALL OKJ4Atl0a ACROSS OR AT FK HT ARC[ES TO THE SLOPE. t F .� `, i I 1 s''•' • .'•' •' r' J WATER FLOW BENEATH SHEETS � 2 • \ r • W. • • • -1 /•' I , f � ® 6 PROPER MANTENANCE INCLUDES REGULAR CHECKS FOR RIPS AND IXSE AGED ENDS• 6. SHOULD ARE IZ BE USED AOCEADJAC TO SUPPLIERS BODIES RECOMMENDATIONS. AMOUNTS USED VJ � Q SHOULD BE MINIMIZED, ESPECIALLY ADJACENT TO WATER BODIES AND WETLANDS N U U N •`.i'4:: �� REQUIRED IN FOR TESC FACILITIES A WEER. THE TESC LEAD SHALL INSPECT ALL OF THE FOLLOWING AND KEEP ARECORD/LOG: %o __ % /,/ r AFTER EVERY RAINFALL OR ONCE FOR SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION AND TEARS IN FABRIC. SHEET INDEX ,; `, {�� V , .- L. •-;:-• J/:. yj/." �h91 1. FILTER FENCE SHALL BE INSPECTED 2, iHTliiCEPYETR DITCHES SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR EROSION. IF EROSION IS OCWRRLNC CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ROCK TQ PREVENT EROSONI. Cl COVER SHEET � TESC PLAN PLAN � _: ,�,r" CREac DAMS As NEEDED 3. FlLL/CUT SLOPES SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR EROSION. C2 GRADING AND DRAMACE C3 NOTES AND DETAILS Moir •1; 4. TESC LEAD RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING ENGINEER IF ADOITONAL MEASURES ARE WARRANTED. I - ,1HI;,;I:;{ .1�. ._ s.:..; s+ARm AOCF�S TrAY`.uTNI �. •, . .'- l MULCHING NOTES CALL 811 AT LEAST 48 AI.1Haes' N mcE _ W NAL W//RASH R I. MULCH MATERIALS USED SHALL BE STRAW OR HAY, AND SHALL BE APPLIED AT THE RATE OF 75-100 POUNDS PER 1000 50. FT. (APPX 2' THICK). 2. MULCHES SHALL BE APPLIED A ALL AREAS WITH EXPOSED SLOPES GREATER THAN 2:1. HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG DESIGNERA BARNETT ENGINEER:J. HAUG DRAWN: A BARNETT S6 T21N R4E WM DATE: 12.19-14 REVISED: PROJECT: 14-049 DWG NAME: 14-049-C SHEET REV. p 3. MULWRC SHALL BE USED IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING OR I. AS WHICH4i�l� 4. ALL AREAS NEEDING MULCH SMALL 13E COVERED BY NOVEMBER 1. ARC KIM RESIDENCE GRAPHIC SCALE 0 1D - A PORTION OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1 INCH = 10 FEET (22"x34") GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 1 INCH = 20 FEET (11 X17 ) pSSUIJEO LOCATION OF POSSIBLE _ DOWNSPOUTS. SEE ARCHITECTURAL 1]73k _ PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION MATCH EG ` \ BEGIN CUT %Wk BOW=135.fi0 % r S _ \ •LEGEND STA 10+07.4J (109.84 LT)JSTA CUT WALL - _ �• _''-:, \'4.� ` `• TOW=17547+ MATCH EG -' ♦ 10+40.05 (110.51 LT) y ~ ,CJ�. •"S• .6S - " SURVEY PROPOSED BOW 13590 (7 =142.5+ MATCH EG=136.0 NO.56'38"E 170.00'SPOT ELEVATIONr104.5t - rt - \-` - -- .'- - - - - _ ; y - �- \-,- ♦, PROPERTY LINE -• - END FILL WALL ti ` - ' - r \ •yD� ' 'I ` - STA 10+04.50 (105.0 LT) - /. �� F'1!1 AT 2:1 MAX SLOPE UNTIL •� ` y TOW=135.65 ,{;:IyS.x '� F - -- ~ ls" 1 5 REACHING EXISTING GRADE DOWNSPOUT • BOW=135.153 MATCH EG \ -- - 1YA0._ --•~~ ��_.�_ ..� ••ti \ •♦\ �\ ` �•�, ii'-`�L pPqq� f `sT . �, T \ VEGATATIVE FLOW PATH FXIST. IEDRAIN UAA° FO , - ` �� r. - _ tt l f `� ♦ `R ` `ti -�. \ NGRTHWESTERLY � ROADWAY `�i '• IS 11 I `1 � '•':� i V ¢ " - l 6" 0 STORM 4 1 WSpEkS10F1 TRENCH 40 40LF 1 RIM = 147.0t DRAIN LINE F .. ti • HMA DRIVEWAY � `y jj r � �� ._-� ♦ I \ ♦ IE 6"0 PERF = 144.0t (N,S) SEE 1 l' 1` 11 ~' `♦ SEE DETAIL L C3 THIS SHEET - STORM DRAIN ; PROPOSED HOME 0 TT-t6222�� LOWER FF=136.0 TYPE 1 CB ■ BOW=131.5! UTT71 EG \ UPPER FF=146.0 y 1 � Z• '�� o ,`�� q � 3rd' L 1 t o- TYPE 2 CB FG=145.5 •� y C•'.Sk13 I 1 l �� SDCO Q N _136.0 FLb145.5 W -\ TYPE 1L CB W/ HERRINGBONE GRATE N I I �� W U '•, TRAFFIC CURB STA 10+13.00 (52.87 LT) NG { _ _ ti RIM = 134.80f O F . ♦ - u� N1tir O WALL ■t��ar RRli I.E. 8"0 = 129.8 (E) Cl) •L .�f J . 7 SEE DETAIL 2/C3 00 1,.\ R-7' 6" EXTRUDED CURB (TYP) II7, T y 'i l/• �, •�\ RIM = 147DOt • ,• • .' ,V ( 0 _ a �~ ♦�� -�On CONTOURS �_ 00_/ F�1�r•2 z 1 _ SEE DETAIL 5/C3 _ r • IE = 144.Ot' 1 q` 8"0 ADS-N72 ® S=2% MIN L . • .. 0= .6,10 • I• ' •• ' ,rh•' • •• Y� �•� j N i 1 �FG•i4S20. .5 ' (8 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 54" CATCH BASR'1 _ E` K" Y T W/ SOLID LOCKING LID ^.m -r,� r? RIM = PERF ( wl r � �1' \ " I�IE 60 PERF (SW) = 144,0 -i •' I ' 1 I 1 • �` STA 10+17 71 (41.20 LT) 'I• •�' jig • , "1 IE 6'0 (NW) = 144.0 RIM = 134.80t `- ,�.y. • • J . -'Sa, 4 T _ I.E. 30'0 = 122.05 (S,N) f ^ `,• ':rig ,,j. - _ i .: r J{ 5 \• I• Y 1 r \1 I, E. 8"0 = 123.08 (E) \ 3S may.. 'LLg --L y Fr, \, ". t' •�,. i� ' •• I 1 \� SEE DETAIL 1/C3 / \`° 1 - � •� T TEND FlLL WALL FG-145.36 145.35 -� - -SI}-�--- ♦rFG=13:�2 r STA 10+50.95 �, F _' ♦ ti , %11 1I "��{� �`. EXIST. �" CPP Y 1 (45.77 LT) J�� - I •r E = 124.07 T.b __ - L TOW=139.60 r V ' SBOW=139.0, EXIST. 24' GMP >X •,x, ---- TOTI�i3S70 + 4 4^ ~ .. PROTECT EXISTING ♦`�) IE = 121.41' t _ q5. 801P=131.6 + I -I WTFALL WITH RIP RAP -vu30" ou7F LL .E1 y.- ' -- - RAP BROTECTIOf1 �-SO�r - = - I ♦ .� � 4�' I.E. = 122.0 .. EXIST. E 5 STA 10+02.79 (43.18 LT) JJ I IE = 14F 15 LINE CHANNEL WITH RIP RAPS 30 EIDSi. e- 148 4 + = 131-1 - • IEXIST, CB ti RM = 15614 30"0 ADS-N12 ®S=1%36F� 2` - _ ♦♦♦ . ' r TOW=1- rs . •. BOW=128.5t MATCH EG DM CREEK BED -433 1' ♦. r 30"0 ADS-1,172 05=41% 128.60 3 f �♦ ' ' r T w' rro I ♦ `I.` 3T CULVERT 136+ _giWl7G ANB ''I r_ / i' �' I . r' ' • i - . \ STA 10+2254 (35.63 LT) V • ` - - \ I.E. = 128.60 -137 AT10N PW15 BEGIN OPEN CREEK \\\ STA 11+61.45 30.83LT Nik�'/ EXISL 24' CMP FM 2 BRASS DISK WITH 'X' INCASEfl � � ter% -�139 IE=1420 - SEE SOUNDNEWS PLANS FOR MORE DETAILS; �D: , f IE - 14527 VISITED 6-9-2011 -,i.�i I' ' T�37 (; j1 ,F � OEM FILL WALL � / l �. '♦ ,'�• ` B47W1 MATCH EG STA 10+21.55 (2,35 LT) �� - f •, ♦ I ' • AST. 24" CMF i5�3 S',, SS SS SS -.aa $=ASS - `-tiS:-- J `IOW=13&1 ASS- �'S�SS _ _ � - aa�CS'- --"ASS �"`�1Y+ �•�'}C"g I-T d.O'_--• "5OA�137.1t MATCH T7G �� v.-- �' l - \•= /. t •`,ti -74 IE 144.00 = allas,_ 10 k r� SO'56'38"W r }1+oO MWFlf11IATl FT:•137 •FG+157.5+! �- � r _. _ `.`• _ � � �' / BOW=135.Ot WTGS�CC- -- -' �� -- _ ` .� / ♦ . l � ti'f: -: i .�, -yam-J - :� `, �l� ^ � . i I `��` .WTCHtA �•.. \\ 2ND AVE SW •4 `- ;x'.` \ �♦ •, o''♦ ti MATCH EC i CALL 811 AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG VERIFICATION NOTE AIL CUM 01EJ1E5 m TIE 006I NCW ARCA °iiVL 6E Mille Alm "a FOR OFPTH AND LCG5T1011 Sc 10 gEMlf7 ARY PaTfHTIAL "WWIS vm PN4PLfif>t C01611NC11pl tce nT PFAaT p7EdlEER 761FAIAmY 6 ANY CON"?$ ARE IDENPRED. VERIFY ENSIIE4 701 IS ODW95W 1ATH WHAT IS "AN ON RA4 AND F TICK ANC ANY POIENDAL UDN"TB YA1N PROPOAO CCNSMQCTXW ACTMPES COIITFOT PAOE[i Ql3HEiA NNEOMMY IF ANY CONFl 1 A1¢ IOEHTYKII. NID WAS R m'101i SEPARATE BASE INITGRAL BASE Al FILM! 1RI Ad1F IK-FY 00 NOTES . Na lqw we r.VkW whn haQll M 4' a lea 2 The b.11- of the pleeml mt6 hall may be Toped W fadt le dembg 1 lsr Fow4 h�.4 bta7Wr o¢pWf.lAi I.TNaL w a Ocm. l ifradlaR rid Tow a .d aA'nr. N r fSblRtAn lv 73' aaS.Tan faeR4W1 a 13 kkTuv ryp 6.Swn YM RneR1b)al rd ad Uy �. 0AM �hfl�al pI TM qp wRh pid M'Ea F xaPlrT4 .4Sfddxd a-w CATCH BASIN DIMENSIONS CATCH BA91 a WALL MOOfa YBL BASE BRoam YA7WAM KNOCKOUT SZE will N BETINSTANCEdALETm KNOCKOUTS 48' 4 B• 11" F 54' 45- R* 4r S 80' 5' 8' 48• B B• 1r11 Airi PIPE ALLOWANCES CATCH PPE W1BLLL W1H MA)?:M WSYE dAIEIER BASH OIAIITTEA �� aw SOLID WALL® WNL@ 48' 24' 30' 24' 30' JIT 54• w 3wr 30' 36 36. Sol 38' 4r 39' 427 4r 22' 4r 5C 42* 48' 46 84' S4' 60' 54• 48' 411' 611 7r IiR 48' 48' 120' 86' Of 48' 114' 711' %' fi0• 48' 4W QQC�pTJC[-:Wwkd'=d (Stmdvd 9-05.20) SlmWd ()Stm4a•d SpecRaIll22) 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 NOT TO SCALE WSDOT STD. PLAN B-10.20-01 2 CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 NOT TO SCALE WSDOT STD. PLAN B-5.20-01 KIM RESIDENCE A PORTION OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON NOTES AND DETAILS FILTER FABRIC MATERAL IN CONTINUSUS ROLLS USE STAPLES OR WAR_ RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE FOR FILTER FABRIC 1 H FF B"x I2" GROVFNOISVRFAC£- THE 6 " :n ___-___".- I w _ 4 AIAW 2"x2"x5WOOD POSTS, STAVCIARD OR BETTER OR EQUIVALENT WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE (TO BE LOCATED ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE '�---^- FILTER FABRIC) FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL WASHED GRAVEL q 3/4" - 3" IN TRENCHNCH AND AND ON BOTH IN OF FILTER FENCE FA13RIC 1: a 8 \ zz k LINE FILTER MATERIAL IN 8"x12",r{, TRENCH AND LEAVE MIN. 2" EXPOSED w SILTATION FENCE NOT TO SCALE SILT FENCES NOTES L MWt rABRC SHALL BE R11OFA9II W OUT TO THE IENOTH Or THE YAIVBER W AVCM 115E D• JONNM TAIW ANTS AK NEL1^Xal 91 roe a SR.Ms BE V%KiA TOWTIIFR GILT AT A STIm i POST. WTM A MNIIW 01 el DyCl AND SLY FASTENED AT BOTH ENDS TO POSTS. L l IKML BE WA44D A HA"" OF a PEST A ANT AND DRIVEN 9-MMY Ii TM GROUND (LrWAEM OF 30 I KNM 3. A. GN SRALL BE IXCAVATED APP"GWATD.Y 8 SKH.S WADE AND 12 BNaIEs OW MAN THE IA¢ IY KSM AND UPSi FRET THE BAIQdIL 1185 TTTdCH SHALL IC BApvuED KM WAB4A CLAIM- 4. TREII STNMDFAp y9tENGRH Ful rAii W lid. A 1141E 1�-D' 1 WAR'OAT fOTOC 71IFAi SE FASRFED yLTKd1Y TO THE UPSlOPE SOE Or THE POSTS USeAD TlC/W-DUIT IAA sTWM AT LEAST 1 RICH lolFO. TIE WRITE$ OR NDO Ill THE Wd1E SOUL UV END r4TO THE =004 A YBWBAF W 4 VKHM AND S9HL ON it OM THAN 24 INCHES ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE S. THE STANDARD sT ,Mm FUCK FAC SHHL HE VARIED OR wall TD TK T"`l AND O li I F, THE iAMad !X&UL BE EfFENDlT 'to W Titil THE FAVAIC 514AT4 NOT CCFW M TIC MAR 34 WoNES ABOVE THE ONONAL [A01A4 SURTAM FITTER FABuc SHALL NOT BE STARED TO EXISTING TREES S. 1SM7+ E)TRA-SERE/ M FiIE)E FA9'0C AND ORQF POST BPALYNO IS U'� i1C 1wIS 1d_JA 9IPPCRT n711£ WY lE T;MHAT�. N 9101 A CASE; TI[ TILIEIE rAaK 15 STAPID a 1RBgD DFSCTLY 10 TIC fR)5T5 rm Au 0T1S)T PROSF90N5 a ABn'+E Ha7FS APRFWW 7. FILTER FABR% fE11LE3 S114E. ROT YE RDA7VED BEFORE ME UPSLOPE AREA WS BEEN P5'INANDIFLY STREl llfA 6 FILIN TA Fill 51W, EC INTYCiED NMEDIAIELT AF1eF FJiOR RADBALL AND AT IlAGT ITA LY IAAiNO ARTQ= RAIBNL AAIY RECURID REPAIRS S BC MAOE MAYma,TELT. 9. SILT FENCES WILL BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO ANY SLOPE CONTOURS In CONTRIBUTING LENGTH TO FENCE WILL NOT BEWIEATER THAN IN FEET. 11. DO NOT INSTALL BELOW AN OUTLET PIPE OR WEB. 12. WSTALL DOwNBAPE OF DO = APEAL 17. DO NOT DRIVE OVER OR FILL OVER SITT FENCES Tw aap IHue flaw to second Men out .ye from PIP. dls L b'P'•ch I�i cosw y natvT.E i1.E�i1TF-[ teal Phe u= r n tches aG hW I xkA/iOsdW cover 1B' A A solid 50' mRa.at pi aax d. Flow Has Cl par tr.nch) t aye era. ppa flow to other Drol lag CB'. as necessary PLAN NTS galvnnlzed bolts Ape 6D. 2' x 12' T2e l pressure O+"nd` board treated grade notches board y y ' c lIw~n°.c NOTES: 4• s 4' .S ei VAFWSee9 L ISed L This trench all be constructed to prevent _ r y, point Nscharq* and/pr el` 9Io ;a a Trenches may be placed no dDser than 50 feet PAS tO one another (100 fabric feet along flowllne). SAS% max for flow SECTION A -A 3, Trench and grade board must be IevN. Align to control/water NITS follow contours of site. uall{ 4. Support payt SP&CtTg ns rntnent In rural te required by Sall areas, c..ofil na to ensure grade board rennin lWvwi. 4 TYPICAL DISPERSION TRENCH FOR BASIC DISPERSION NOT TO SCALE KC SWDM FIG 4.2.2.8 W-90M OF — prT�ltrtD DDIr 0 15 NTI]iYu PROVIDE WEEPHOLES 0 10' INTERVALS WHEN ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE ARAS 5 EXTRUDED CURB NOT is SGM,E WSDOT SID. PLAN F-%42-0 INLET P1dOT=]ON NOTES. L ESHALL BE INSPECTED RH AND CLEANED OR REPLACED WHEN 1/aRM 3 FULL 2, ALL CATCH BASINS WITHIN SOD' DOWINSLOPE OF PROJECT SITE SHALL AS Til AS ANY OTHER CATCH BASfNS THAT COULD HAVE iNELET PRaiECT10N IHSiALLED AJNI) MAINTAINED SITE SHALL INLET PROTECTION NOT TO SCALE AMENDED SOILS NOTES (�) e WL AMENDMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN ACCORDANCE MATH El L613; POST -CONSTRUCTION SOL. QUALITY AND DEPTH OF THE 2DI2 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL • AMENDED SOBS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF B' (HOOT -COMPACTED) MATH SUBSOILS SCAIRTFIED AT LEAST 4- WITH INCORPORATION OF THE UPPER MATERIAL TO AVOID STRATIFIED LAYERS, WHERE FEASIBLE QUALITY OF COMPOST AND OTHER MATERIALS USED TO MEET THE ORGANIC CONTENT REQUIREMENTS ARE AS FELLOWS: o. THE ORGANIC CONTENT FOR 'PRE-APPROVED"AMENDMENT RATES CAN BE MET ONLY USING COMPOST THAT MEETS THE DEFINITION OF 'COMPOSTED MATERIAll IN WAC 173-350-220. THE WAC IS AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: MLV THE COMPOST MUST ALSO HAVE AN ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT OFF 35% TO M. AND A CARBON TO NITROGEN RATIO BELOW 2S.'t THE CARBON TO NITROGEN RATIO MAY BE AS HICH AS 35:1 FOR PLANTINGS COMPOSED ENTIRELY OF PLANTS NATIVE TO THE PUGET SM140 LOWLAl REGION -CALCULATED AMENDMENT RATES MAY BE MET THROUGH USE OF COMPOSTED MATERIALS AS DEFINED ABOVE; OR OTHER ORGANIC MATERIALS AMENDED TO MEET THE CARBON TO NITROGEN RATIO REWITill AND MEEIWO THE CONTAMINANT STANDARDS OF GRADE A COMPOST. • USE ONE OF THE FMOW1NG OPTIONS M MEET THE POST CONSTRUCTION SOIL OUAUTY AND DEPTH REQUIREMENTS, USE THE MOST RECENT VERSION OF 'GUI ICUNES FOR RESOURCES FOR IMPLEMENTING SOIL QUALITY AND DEPTH BLED T5.13' TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS BAP. THIS GUIDANCE CAN BE FOUND ONUNE AT; WWW.SOILSFORS"ON.ORG a. LEAVE NATIVE VEGETATION AND SOIL UHDISTLERBED, AND PROTECT FROM COMPACTION DURING CONSTRUCTION A All EXISTING SITE TOPSOIL 09 SUBSOIL EITHER AT DEFAULT'PRE-APPROVED' RATE$, OR AT CUSTOM CALCULATED RATES BASED ON $PECIMERS TESTS OF THE SOIL AND AMENDMENT c. STOCKPILE EASTWG TOPSOLL DURING CRADINC, AND REPLACE IT PRIOR TO PLANTING- STOCKPILED TOPSOIL MUST ALSO BE AMENDED IF NEEDED TO MEET THE ORGANIC MATTER OR DEPTH REOURIEMIl EITHER AT A DEFAULT'PRE-APPROTrEO' RATE OR AT A CUSTOM CALCULATED RATE d- IMPORT TOPSOIL MIX OF SUFFIGFldT ORGANIC CONTENT 00 DEPTH M MEET THE REQUIR1DACHTS• MORE THAN ONE METHOD MAY BE USED ON DIFFERENT PORTIONS OF THE SAME SITE. SOIL THAT ALREADY MEETS THE DEP11,11 AND ORGANIC MATTER QUALITY STANDARDS, AND IS NOT COMPACTED. DOES NOT NEED TO BE AIMENDEO. • AMENDED SOILS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AS FOLLOWS' a. SOIL QUALITY AND DEPTH SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED TOWARD THE END OF CONSTRUCTION AND ONCE ESTABLISHED, SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM COMPACTION. SUCH AS FROM LARGE MACHINERY USE, AND FROM EROSION. b. SOIL SHOULD BE PLANTED AND MULCHED AFTER INSTALLATION. c. PLANT DOM OR ITS EQUIVALENT SHOULD BE LEFT ON THE SOIL SURFACE TO REPI.ENISH ORGANIC MATTER. d. IT SHOULD BE POSSIBLE TO REDUCE USE OF IRRIGATION, FERTILIZERS, HERBICIDES AND PISTICNDES. THESE ACrINRES SHOULD BE ADJUSTED WERE ✓aOSSBLE, RATHER THAN CONTINLRNC TO IMPLEMENT FORMERLY ESTABLISHED PRACTICES. CALL 811 AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG KIM - PROPOSED CHANGES p ;0 20 46 GRAPHIC SCALE V=2, 1 • I � 1 1 NO'56'38"E 170.00' ! • -• -- � .� ter, ..� � • ��-' � � r.� ..� �--�. �.�. -.�-� � ..�.. .� 1 as f PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY 50' STREAM CHANNEL OFFSET LINE RESIDENCE ,'� i p APPROX. 36.5') 78' (2,853 SF) s2 ; N, r"rrrrrwrrrwrtrtrtrtrrr ~ N •• ,` N N W MI Yy i U Q - U i6' pQ zf � i zQ --- j ; z= * I Z:) V) I j 56'380W 170.00' - 2ND AVE SW 1 o 4 NOTE: SEE ENGINEERS PLANS FOR STORMWATER DETAILS I o L4 1 WZ n c W W 1nY rA V. c Q 62 f g N Z Ck==::> U[/) O' n Be) N LD 10 sN d �.i U In - 144 ;2 � c � N N 7 C J K U �1 Q o _ to M, - rn x •, u t - r. -0 c M O M O N 'V Un00 a,, W w W D a C) z N aQP-4 1 2 N � N �pp o r� cV [i] wo O -� DATE: 3/16/2015 JOB: 1101.0001 BY: JR sc.0E: 1" = 20' SHL+ET 2 OF 3 TZTM - PT , A NTING PLAN wwwwws—� GRAPHIC SCALE ]^=20' Ir EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN (TYPICAL) �•�.' Oil i I' 4 oe1 • I' I TYPICAL PLANTING LAYOUT SCALE: 1" = 20' BUFFER SEED MIX % (BY PLANT NAME (SCIENTIFIC) COMMON NAME WEIGHT) Agrosis exerata SPIKE BENTGRASS 10 Deschampsia cespitosa TUFTED HAIRGRASS 10 Deschampsia danthonioides ANNUAL HAIRGRASS 10 Deschampsia elongata SLENDER HAIRGRASS 10 Elymus glaucus BLUE WILDRYE 25 Hordeum brachyantherum MEADOW BARLEY 25 [L,�pSTREAMSIDE LUPINE 10 PLANT LIST TYPICAL SYMBOL PLANT NAME COMMON NAME QUANTITY (APPROX.) SIZE (GAL) SPACING (FT (SCIENTIRC) O.C.) TREES ? ; Prunus emarginata BITTER CHERRY 3 2 10 Z Pinus Contorta SHORE PINE 2 2 10 h s �srrrlYrr = Alnus rubra RED ALDER 3 2 10 Thuja plicata WESTERN RED 4 2 10 CEDAR SHRUBS AND PLANTS ::A:cer circinatum VINE MAPLE 4 1 10 Ribes sanquineum RED CURRANT 10 1 5 + Rosa nutkana NOOTKA ROSE 30 1 5 Vaccinium ovatum EVERGREEN HUCKLEBERRY 22 1 5 Gaultheria shallon SALAL 20 1 5 Arctostaphyles uva-ursi KINNIKINNIK 25 1 5 Sambucus racemosa RED ELDERBERRY 10 1 5 itlk Tw Rubus spectabilis SALMON BERRY 15 1 5 GROUND COVER Athyrium filix-femina LADY FERN 75 1 E/2 Polystichum munitum SWORD FERN 26 1 9 Carex obnupta SLOUGH SEDGE 113 1 112 ® Juncus effusus SOFT RUSH 114 1 112 NOTE: PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS MAY BE MADE WITH WETLAND BIOLOGIST APPROVAL LOCATOR LATH (IF SPECIFIED) 3 to 4 INCH LAYER OF MULCH NOTES: PLANT SHRUBS OF THE SAME SPECIES It GROUPS OF 3 to 5. EXCAVATE PIT TO FULL DEPTH OF ROOT MASS AND CANOPY DIAMETER_ SPREAD ROOTS TO FULL WIDTH OF CANOPY. MIDWAY THROUGH PLANTING ADD AGROFORM TABLET AND WATER THOROUGHLY. BACKFILL TO BE COMPACTED USN G WATER ONLY. WATER IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE STAKES OPTIONAL. TO BE USED AT DISCRETION OF PROJECT BIOLOGIST. 3" DEEP SAUCER FOR WATER 4 REMOVE ALL TIES, WRAPS & ! . CONTAINERS. FREE PERIMETER lei ROOTS FROM NURSERY BALL. EXCAVATE TREE PIT AT A MIN. OF 4 TIMES DIA.OF LL R,, TAPERING PIT AT BALL CENTER, �f GRADE TO FINISH GRADE. PIT SOILS, NURSERY BALL WASTE BACKFILL , SET BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE, OR COMPACTED SOIL. NOTE: WORK PERIMETER ROOTS FREE OF NURSERY BALL & SPAAD OVER EXCAVATED PIT TO BE COARSELY SCARIFIED. TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE E -c3c v 3 M Z 0- ==> - d^ W cU C!-) � E N a N a 10 a e ri in j N N G c � J n All 7- -2 `J 0 Ln c 0 z N o w� Q�� i E �z 2 Nw� � CwOU O C7 z F w DATE: 3/16/2015 JOB: 1101.0001 BY: JR sc.,1La AS NOTE SHEET 3 OF 3 _ 1 1CA A N c IZ T �- I Im�� CD n �z r� 1 N } co = I 3 CD ,1 CCD � D- 1 3 O CD � o i, I =_ } 1 C, I a i io 3 I t � I VJ C m 0 M C6 0 m ■ ■ 0 m N co Y + T� i N M 40' V ' \ �� 1420' • 170.00'(C) `\ IN T \ \ N1 C� \ _ , C7 ,``,``,\`� -- - \�a�+�� IN , r`+\' N0�6'3B'E 170.00'(C) L yh w \ \ R , N `. --'•�` � �{,`� .41Y ` IN 41 .. IN IN R \ `` R ♦ R `� L ♦ ' ♦•` . IN ♦ `\``\ \ L R \ IN , IN \ \ ` , , ♦ `\ .• 40' \` I �lJ ` , Jll I m co n �> o X m CA- i019.88' 2ND AVENUE S.W. o 1 i w c— o� z m— -- \ \ \ R IN \ \ w 'IN ESUBMPF� IN IN, JUN 12 2013� IIj • jl ITY OF FEDERAL �.YI ♦ \ ♦ \�+ • , CDS � GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 1 INCH = 10 FEET (24"xW") CD 138' 136' 134' 132' 130, 128' 126' 124' KIM PROJECT A PORTION OF THE SW %4 OF THE NE %4 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 21 N, RANGE 4 E, W.M. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 2ND AVENUE S.W. CROSS-SECTION A STORMWATER OUTLET R TAINING WALL W/ BIRDCAGE LOG WEIR i LOG W IR r7 BOX CULVERT C 0+05 0+10 0+15' 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 1 c�(5'O } CD W a 0 Z 0 (L U to 0 Z 0 Cn W PREPARED BY: Y / / > 3F R y/ t -,d Zt M Environmental natural Resource, and land Use Consultants 2907 1 I.arbon iew Drive Office 253.514.8952 Gib; Harbor; \VA 98335 Fax 25 3.514.8954 s o u n d c* C z w- - o n- u C t ca n t s. _. o ,n PREPARED FOR: CHIN -SUP KIM 34102 13TH PLACE SOUTHWEST FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98023 v.0!T ` ° nn CHI i Sl 1P I�.. PHONE: (253) 405-3348 PROJECT LOCATION: 29424 2ND AVENUE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 (KING COUNTY) PROJECT TITLE: KIM PROJECT SHEET TITLE: SITE MAP JOB NUMBER: 1101.0001 DESIGNED BY: JD DRAWN BY: KM/JR CHECKED BY: JD DATE: 6/12/2013 REVISED: SUB T REV. 'IN 12 20ML-1 CDS L WAY 1 OF 1