The URL can be used to link to this page

12-104587, 12-104588CITY OF CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South .. Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal Way __....� (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com December 13, 2012 Mr. George Pierce FILE RYKA Constulting 9-1-8—South-Horton--Street-Suite- t00--3 -- Seattle, WA 98134 Re: File #12-104587-00-UP; PROCESS III —'PROJECT APPROVAL' AT&T — WA696 Saghalie Park, 33914 191h Avenue SW, Federal Way Dear Mr. Pierce: The Community and Economic Development Department has completed administrative land use review of the proposed Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) improvements located at 33914 190, Avenue SW, Saghalie Park. The site is owned by City of Federal Way Parks Department. The applicant proposes to upgrade an existing PWSF by replacing the existing 95' light pole with a 103' light pole and adding three new LTE 4G Antennas. Associated upgrades to the radio equipment within the equipment shelter are included. The proposed upgrade is to prepare the site for the new LTE (4G) technology. The Process III Master Land Use (MLU) application submitted October 9, 2012, is hereby approved based on the enclosed findings of fact, incorporated into this decision in full, and the following conclusions based on those facts: 1. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan; 2. The proposal is consistent with all applicable provisions of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC); 3. The proposal is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare; 4. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal; 5. The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration; and 6. Traffic safety impacts for all modes of transportation, both on and off site, are adequately mitigated. File#12-104597-00-UP Doc ID 62732 Mr. George Pierce Page 2 December 13, 2012 The remainder of this letter outlines the land use review process required for this particular site improvement; summarizes the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) process; and provides other procedural information. This land use decision does not authorize initiation of construction activities. REVIEW PEtOuSSES -. bUIRED Pursuant to FWRG.19.1 030(3), improvements and/or additions to an existing developed site that are not exempt from SEPA shal be processed under Use Process III. The Director of Community and Economic Development will -make -the initial land use decision based -on written- comments and information gathered during site plan review. Any appeals of the decision will be decided by the Hearing Examiner after a public hearing. SEPA PROCESS The City of Federal Way issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on November 28, 2012, pursuant to Washington Administrative Code 197-11-350. Following review of the environmental checklist, the city determined the proposal would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement would not be required, and no SEPA based mitigation was necessary. REQUESTS FOR CHANGE OF VALUATION Any affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes, not withstanding any program of revaluation. APPROVAL DURATION Unless modified or appealed, the Process III decision is valid for five years from the date of issuance of the decision. Time extensions to the decision may be requested prior to the lapse of approval following the provisions listed in FWRC 19.15.110. APPEALS The effective date of issuance is three calendar days following the date of this letter, December 16, 2012. Pursuant to FWRC 19.65.120, this land use decision may be appealed by any person who submitted written comments or any person who has specifically requested a copy of the decision. Any appeal must be in the form of a letter delivered to the Community and Economic Development Department with the established fee and within 14 days after the effective date of issuance of this decision, or December 31, 2012. The appeal letter must contain a clear reference to the matter being appealed and a statement of the factual findings and conclusion of the director disputed by the person filing the appeal. The Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hear any appeals of the Process III decision. CLOSING This land use decision does not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. File # 12-104597-00-UP Doc. I.D. 62732 Mr. George Pierce Page 3 December 13, 2012 If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Assistant Planner Becky Chapin at 253-835- 2641, or rebecca.chapin@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Isaac Conlen -- Planning Manager _ - for Patrick Doherty, Director enc: Exhibit A, Statement of Findings and Conclusions Approved Plan Set c: Becky Chapin, Assistant Planner Steve Ikerd, Parks and Facilities Manager File #12-104597-00-UP Doe.1D. 62732 1%� CITY OF Federal Way 1 *614 mr-1-1-96"MI Findings for Project Approval Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.65, "Process III Project Approval' AT&T Mobility — WA696 Saghalie Park, File 12-104587-00-UP The Planning Division hereby presents the following analysis to the Director of Community and Economic Development pursuant to content requirements of the Process III written decision as set forth in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.65.100(4). l . Proposal — The applicant proposes to upgrade an existing Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) by replacing the existing 95' light pole with a 103' light pole and adding three new LTE 4G Antennas. Associated upgrades to the radio equipment within the equipment shelter are included. 2. Site Conditions — The existing PWSF is located on a light standard pole on Federal Way parks property (Saghalie Park), at 33914 19'h Avenue SW, Federal Way. The ground equipment is located within an existing shelter; no changes are proposed to modify the equipment shelter location. Comprehensive Plan and Zoning — The city's comprehensive plan designation is Multi -Family, and the zoning is Multifamily Residential (RM 2400). PWSFs are permitted in the RM zone pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.205.200. Review Process — The replacement and addition of antennas to the existing PWSF is not exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review and is subject to Process III `Project Approval' review. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) — The proposal is not exempt from environmental review pursuant to Washington Administrative Code 197-11-800(25)(a)(iii). The city utilized the Optional Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) process as allowed by SEPA Rules. A combined Notice of Application and Optional DNS was issued November 2, 2012. No comments were received during the integrated comment period. The city's Responsible Official issued a DNS on December 28, 2012. The threshold determination appeal period ended December 12, 2012, with no appeals submitted to the Federal Way City Clerk. 6. Public Notice — Pursuant to Process III and SEPA regulations, a Notice of Land Use Application and Optional DNS were published in the Federal Way Mirror, posted at two locations at the subject site, and displayed on the designated city notice boards on November 2, 2012. Notices were also mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. No comments were received on the land use application or SEPA DNS notice. Findings for Project Approval Page 1 AT&T WA696 — Saghalie Park File 12-104587-00-UP/Doe. I.D. 62687 7. Prioritized Locations — The applicant proposes to locate the PWSF on, "Existing broadcast, relay, and transmission towers...," which is the second priority location of the five prescribed in FWRC 19.255.010(4). Higher prioritized location, "Structures located in the BPA trail...," is not feasible as this proposal is an upgrade to an existing facility. There are no alternative BPA towers in the proposed vicinity. Staff finds the applicant has met the burden to utilize the second prioritized location. The antenna modifications should provide the full benefit of service to the area. 8. PWSF Development Standards — PWSFs located on existing structures shall meet development standards prescribed in FWRC 19.255.020(1). The following are staff responses to each criterion: a. The PWSF exceeds the minor facility thresholds for the number of antennas and size, -but creates no more adverse impacts than a minor facility -.Based on site photos and? — -- -- - detailed drawings, the proposed addition will be installed in the same manner as the previously approved antennas and the visual impact will be minimal. b. The combined antennas will not exceed 15' above the existing structure. The proposal does increase the height by 8', which is the minimum necessary to support the new technology and prevent interference with existing PWSFs. The existing pole/structure cannot support the additional antenna, so a replacement light standard pole is necessary. c. This section does not apply as the proposed PWSF is not in a right-of-way. d. The proposed antennas will use "flush -mounting" techniques and match existing conditions. The impacts to surrounding uses will be no greater than the existing facility. e. The proposed size and number of the antennas are necessary to meet AT&T new 4G LTE coverage objectives as depicted in the project narrative and maps provided by the applicant. f. The existing ground equipment meets current regulations. The additional equipment is to be added to an existing shelter. The footprint of the facility will not be enlarged and will meet the setback requirements. Screening Standards — PWSFs are required to be screened using best available technology and design. The proposed antennas will use "flush -mounting" technologies and be painted to match the existing antennas. These measures appropriately mitigate visual impacts of the facility, cause no adverse cumulative effects, and meet aesthetic standards set forth in FWRC 19.255.020(1)(d). 10. Electronics Equipment Standards — No material expansions or changes to the architectural design of the enclosure are proposed. Therefore, these changes are exempt from PWSF standards set forth in FWRC Chapter 19.255 and are permitted outright with no further regulatory action required pursuant to FWRC 19.255.010(3)(g). 11. Security Screening — The PWSF includes existing structure and landscape screen; no new fencing or expansion of existing lease area is proposed. 12. Cumulative Effects — The city must consider the cumulative visual effects of the PWSF mounted on an existing structure in determining whether additional permits may be granted so as to not adversely affect the visual character of the city. Based on the plans and photo -simulations of the proposed Findings for Project Approval Page 2 AT&T WA696 — Saghalie Park File 12-104587-00-UP/Doc. I.D. 62687 modifications, the PWSF will not adversely affect the visual character of the city. The additional antennas will be camouflaged through best available technology and design and will have less of an impact than creating a new PWSF site. 13. Condition of Approval — The following condition of approval shall be a component of the Process III land use decision: d Prior to any site work, the applicant shall obtain an electrical permit from the city's Department of Community and Economic Development. 14. Process III Decision Criteria — Based on the above findings, staff has determined the proposal is consistent with applicable site plan approval criteria required for Process III `Project Approval' pursuanf�the following FWRC 19.65.100(2) items. Staff responses (italicized) follow each criterion: a. It is consistent with the comprehensive plan; The proposal is consistent with the following Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) goals and policies: PUG] — Work with private utility companies to allow them to provide full and timely service that meets the needs of the city's residents and businesses, both present and future. PUG2 — Work with private utility companies to allow them to provide service in a way that balances cost-effectiveness with environmental protection, aesthetic impact, public safety, and public health. PUP17 — The city should require that site speck utility facilities such as antennas and substations be reasonably and appropriately sited and screened to mitigate adverse aesthetic impacts. b. It is consistent with all applicable provisions of this title; The site plan has been reviewed under FWRC Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code, " with speck attention to the following divisions and/or chapters: Division I, Administration; Chapter 19.65, Process III Project Approval; Chapter 19.205, Multifamily Residential (AM; and Chapter 19.255, Personal Wireless Service Facilities. c. It is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare; No adverse impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposal. The PWSF has received approval from City of Federal Way Parks Department. The Process III MLU application has been reviewed under SEPA, FWCP, and applicable provisions of the FWRC. d. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal; Findings for Project Approval Page 3 AT&T WA696 — Saghalie Park File 12-104587-00-UP/Doc. I.D. 62687 The city s Traffic Division has determined the PWSF will not require concurrency review and will not adversely affect the current level of service. The Lakehaven Utility District has determined no sewer or water improvements are required for the PWSF. e. The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration; The facility is an existing site and no changes are proposed to the access points to the facility. f. Traffic safety impacts for all modes of transportation, both on or offsite, are adequately mitigated. — As the facility is unmanned, this criterion is not applicable. These findings shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. Prepared by: Becky Chapin, Assistant Planner Findings for Project Approval AT&T WA696 — Saghalie Park Date: December 13, 2012 Page 4 File 12-104587-00-UP/Doc.1.D. 62687 NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION AND NOTICE OF OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: AT&T WAG96 Project Description: Proposal to upgrade an exist- ing Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) by replacing the existing 95' fight pale with a 103' light pole and adding three new LTE 4G Antennas. Associated upgrades to the radio equipment within the equipment shelter are also included. Applicant: George Pierce, RYKA Consulting, 918 South Horton Street, Suite 1002, Seattle, WA 98134 Project Location: 33914 19th Avenue SW, Federal Way Date Application Received: October 9, 2012 Date Determined Complete: October 26, 2012 D a t e o f N o t i c e o f Application: November 2, 2012 Comment Due Date: November 19, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental Checklist and other infor- mation on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on ilia environment and expects to issue a Determine- tlon� of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11.355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to com- ment on the environmental impacts of the pro- posed project. The proposal may include mitiga- tion measures under applicable codes, and the re= view process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specif- ic proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, l0es, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Required by This Application: Master and Use Process Ill (File #12-104587-UP) and State Environmental Policv Act Threshold Determi- nation (File #12-104588-SE) Otter Permits Known at this Time and Not In- 1®luded in This Application: Electrical Permit Existing Environmental Documents: None Relevant Environmental Documents Are Avail- able at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Review Known at this Time: Federal Way Revised Code Title 14, 'Environmental Policy' and Title 19 'Zoning and Development Code.' Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may sub- mit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Develop, ment by 5:o0 p.m. on November 19. 2012. Only persons who submit written comments to the Di- rector (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party may appeal the envi- ronmental threshold determination. Details of ap- peal procedures for the requested land use deci- sion will be included with the written decision. issuance of Final Environmental Determination- The final Determination of Nonsignificance may be Essued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identity probable significant ad- verse impacts that were not considered by the No- tice of Optional Determination of Nonsignificance. A copy of the Determination of Nonsigni€icance may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is avalf- able for public review at the Department of Cam- munity and Economic Development, 33325 8th Av- enue South, Federal Way. WA 98003-6325. Staff Contact: Becky Chapin, Assistant Planner. 253-835-2641 Published in the Federal Way Mirror November 2, 2012, FWM 1950 31919 1 �" Ave S, Suite 1 O 1 1 Federal, Way, WA 93003 1 253.925.5565 1253.925.5750 (f) Affidavit of Publication Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained by the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way - Community Development Department as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive weeks(s), commencing on the 2nd day of November 2012, and ending on the 2nd day of November 2012. both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $152.85, which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65. 16.020. Subscribed to and sworn before me this 18th day of December 2012. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way ► � 9s9. 0 NOTARY - r PUBLIC ` -�A :o: A' . 41k CITY 10'::ttt=P OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.ciiyoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, ]ram hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was 14mailed ❑ faxed 'Ke-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on V4oi 0 / ,2012. Project Name !� File Number(s) Signature Date 11 'J 9 " JD/J K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1/12/2012 2:20:00 PM CITY OF Federal Way ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) AT&T WA696 — Saghalie Park File No. 12-104588-00-SE Proposal: Applicant proposes to upgrade an existing Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) by replacing the existing 95' light pole with a 103' light pole and adding three new LTE 4G antennas. Associated upgrades to the radio equipment within the equipment shelter are also included. Applicant: George Pierce, RYKA Consulting, 918 South Horton Street, Suite 1002, Seattle, WA 98134 Location: 33914 19`hAvenue SW, Federal Way Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Community and Economic Development Staff Contact: Becky Chapin, Assistant Planner, 253-835-2641 The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following decision based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal Way Revised Code, 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to Revised Code of Washington (RC W) 43.31 C.060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.2 1 C.032(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. No written comments were received in response to the 14-day commentperiod that ended November 19 2012. There is no further comment period on the DNSon_ the DNS. You may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk, no later than 5:00 p.m. on December 12, 2012, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager for Patrick Doherty, Director of Community and Economic Development Address: Date Issued: 33325 8 h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Doc. I.D 61_628 DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC PO BOX 47703 p 504-7703 sepa u nit@ecy.wa. gov SEPA Optional DNS Notice and Checklist to the following agencies and tribes BRANDON REYNON PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPT 3009 E PORTLAND AVE TACOMA WA 98404 MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ATTN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWEF 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98092 Tamara Fix From: Tamara Fix Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 8:23 AM To: 'ECY RE SEPA UNIT' Subject: AT&T Saghalie Park DNS Attachments: ATT Saghalie DNS.pdf Attached is the DNS for the AT&T Saghalie Park project in the City of Federal Way. This was issued on November 28, 2012, and the Assistant Planner for the project is Becky Chapin, 253-835-2641, rebecca.chapin@citvoffederalway.com. CITY OF ..4, Federal Way November 28, 2012 George Pierce RYKA Consulting 918 South Horton Street, Suite 1003 Seattle, WA 98134 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com RE: File #12-104015-00-SE; ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD DETERMINATION AT&T WA696 — Saghalie Park, 33914 191h Avenue SW, Federal Way Dear Mr. Pierce: The city and jurisdictional agencies have reviewed the environmental checklist submitted with the AT&T WA696 — Saghalie Park Process III Master Land Use (MLU) application. It has been determined that the proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. As a result, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is enclosed. The Optional DNS Process was used to review this proposal. The 14-day comment period required by SEPA rules ran concurrently with the public comment period associated with the notice of land use application, which began on November 2, 2012, and ended November 19, 2012. The city did not receive written comments regarding the MLU application or environmental checklist. Pursuant to Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-355, a second comment period is not required upon issuance of the DNS. The enclosed DNS was issued on November 28, 2012. The city will provide a copy of the DNS to the Department of Ecology, agencies with jurisdiction, Puyallup and Muckleshoot tribes, and anyone requesting a copy. All final determinations may be appealed within 14 days following the issuance of the DNS. No licenses, permits, or approvals will be issued until completion of the appeal period, which ends December 12, 2012. The decision not to require an EIS does not grant the license, permit, or approval you are seeking from the city. The environmental record is considered by the decision maker(s) and conditions will be imposed to reduce identified environmental impacts, as long as the conditions are based on adopted and designated city policy. After a final decision has been made on your proposal you may, but are not required to, publish a Notice of Action as permitted in RCW 43.21C.075. The Notice of Action sets forth a time period after which no legal challenges regarding the proposal's compliance with SEPA can be made. The city is not responsible for publishing the Notice of Action. Questions regarding the PWSF's environmental review component should be directed to me at 253-835-2641 or rebecca.chapin@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Becky Chapi Assistant Planner enct DNS Doc. I D. 62629 k CITY OF Federal Way ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) AT&T WA696 — Saghalie Park File No. 12-104588-00-SE F I L Proposal: Applicant proposes to upgrade an existing Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) by replacing the existing 95' light pole with a 103' light pole and adding three new LTE 4G antennas. Associated upgrades to the radio equipment within the equipment shelter are also included. Applicant: George Pierce, RYKA Consulting, 918 South Horton Street, Suite 1002, Seattle, WA 98134 Location: 33914 19ffi Avenue SW, Federal Way Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Community and Economic Development Staff Contact: Becky Chapin, Assistant Planner, 253-835-2641 The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following decision based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal Way Revised Code, 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.31C.060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.032(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. No written comments were received in response to the 14-day comment period that ended November 19, 2012._There is no further comment period on the DNS. You may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk, no later than 5:00 p.m. on December 12, 2012, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager for Patrick Doherty, Director of Community and Economic Development Address: Date Issued: 't33?t Rb Avenue South_ Federal Way. WA 98003 Doc I D 62628 CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www. ci tvof f ed erolway. cam DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, Kennith George hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on November 2th 2012. Project Name At&T File Number(s) _ #12-104587-UP, 12-104588-SE Signature v Date t Z- K:\Intern\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc Posting Sites: Federal Way City Hall- 33325 8th Avenue Federal Way Regional Library- 34200 1st Way South FedeFG! Wa-y-32- &PA—Pr#1 ibFepn 948 South 32GIh 9 Closed for Construction Subject Site- 33914 19th AVE SW, Federal Way K:\Intern\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc A�� CITY of Federal V' ay NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION AND NOTICE OF OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: AT&T WA696 Project Description: Proposal to upgrade an existing Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) by replacing the existing 95' light pole with a 103' light pole and adding three new LTE 4G Antennas. Associated upgrades to the radio equipment within the equipment shelter are also included. Applicant: George Pierce, RYKA Consulting, 918 South Horton Street, Suite 1002, Seattle, WA 98134 Project Location: 33914 19t` Avenue SW, Federal Way Date Application Received: October 9, 2012 Date Determined Complete: October 26, 2012 Date of Notice of Application: November 2, 2012 Comment Due Date: November 19, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Required by This Application: Master Land Use Process III (File #12-104587-UP) and State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination (File #12-104588-SE) Other Permits Known at this Time and Not Included in This Application: Electrical Permit Existing Environmental Documents: None Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Review Known at this Time: Federal Way Revised Code Title 14, `Environmental Policy' and Title 19 `Zoning and Development Code.' Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Development by 5:00 p.m. on November 19, 2012. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party may appeal the environmental threshold determination. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional Determination of Nonsignificance. A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33325 8 Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325. Staff Contact: Becky Chapin, Assistant Planner, 253-835-2641 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on November 2, 2012. Doc. I.D.62444 O N O co ca O W W co CD (D C (D r� L m m 5'm ��v `(D :E = � o D�'i .om4-n < c> C, (D .91 Q ID r U1 � -i a 3 (D0� CD m H ai3m .0+7 CD 0 Cl) N bi y O T Im ?D —cm j fo fC , C x. 1p� a (D .- Imo (G p ? p m ■ �/ m (D C O fG co �(O p m FiTm CD ICU7 S CD yco CD w <D O to W W CD 40k OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cifyoffederaiway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION V>-IZI, rr�� _ hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was Mmailed ❑ faxed N e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on ` DOE Project 4-T 11 File Number(s) Q -16 4 5 cs - Q4by5V9_ Signature 7�Date 1 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /12/2012 2:20:00 PM CITY OF - 1751 Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION AND NOTICE OF OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: AT&T WA696 Project Description: Proposal to upgrade an existing Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) by replacing the existing 95' light pole with a 103' light pole and adding three new LTE 4G Antennas. Associated upgrades to the radio equipment within the equipment shelter are also included. Applicant: George Pierce, RYKA Consulting, 918 South Horton Street, Suite 1002, Seattle, WA 98134 Project Location: 33914 190i Avenue SW, Federal Way Date Application Received: October 9, 2012 Date Determined Complete: October 26, 2012 Date of Notice of Application: November 2, 2012 Comment Due Date: November 19, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used_ This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Required by This Application: Master Land Use Process III (File 912-104587-UP) and State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination (File #12-104588-SE) Other Permits Known at this Time and Not Included in This Application: Electrical Permit Existing Environmental Documents: None Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Review Known at this Time: Federal Way Revised Code Title 14, `Environmental Policy' and Title 19 `Zoning and Development Code.' Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Development by 5:00 p.m. on November 19, 2012. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party may appeal the environmental threshold determination. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional Determination of Nonsignificance. A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official gproject file is available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33325 8 Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003--6325. Staff Contact: Becky Chapin, Assistant Planner, 253-835-2641 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on November 2, 2012. Doc. I D. 62444 203 P�o� k/§ CL 2cr t ))� -t °° f r §js o Q$2 [ u� 2 A7 k 7 J= 2 LL CLW03 ■§2tig CLU)'m � � � � � � � F— Od � � -�..� ...� @ EC31 : . m .. L. � k > ) <1Z a a 2 2 IZP 0 a. :? W oU) �o U') C)2 o � O � C� _ � 0 �i 2 as 1 t O c] ;D ti a � ;a � j � ;p r- 7 u 1 a a 17 -nih MS Id silt d ra a aTu _ ;o Ir U3 Z' v 1 r `1 1 ti , a :n r p a y ;5 a 31 r Y ° IN p 3 IN a G N a an d C a CL a � r w a O Z m S ,n ra- 7ldy 7j- at n j n a r*7 T- n ry Ca m m m N N a =� a^a�Y ^l j o �y Di .n u r- J ;y O O n ti r ,any a a m .L y w r ,.nN"1 14 r .L ^ti n � y O Im c ov r q m� m y.y � mid cm c3 Z E U) O m � mn' al rl �1 T'u C r � MS fi1Zl a M m r r Amy lr- jp t 1 M pp +, > O7 a _� a J m m C > �`�- ILOE2 p a _ _ t TL ar _7aU, o»°Em Z a F O C 3 C U3 m _ a ao -7. U jvOg ND ;�tr t �mem Rs r m �---B lu x w mm b a i M >:Fi m m _ 10SEa E a a� ° as r_ ya -Mg 7� L j ra c C C p O am mn a - m o- a Qg_=E a` " �EEr MS htlAti It1bl =� =' a -° ago m .MS -Ad ilw a _ _ ti� .0 :o rz0N } g O L _7 C ,,,n to m O C Ep y m N m O N Tu U rtw N Y N w C ❑ t, 1k �d k"q r m >t A .n ,q n _1 n M M r- 9 (J r- CO- _ x x 7fY 711 m �J `' CI -4 ^ 7 �4 T � T 79- - E. r. - M -. m T 31 -1 it - T �I �. N � LJU u U r LLJ U o LL u- 0 V 3 go a mm cCM NYN CL O Cp3 ym� - .7 o W g _a m� OOp0 :l m 70 ao 31 000.0 _ _ _ mN 4 _ N _ F N=.g cu aa� - voles =' Roca •� T Q 7o7or-, �V— aS X 0 15, 0O m .T. N CDC1 o) .6 N L O -v M W m >��2 1 m,- RcE_ E � OLC R O1R r- - _ N D, � Y J b� C C N C v -v N O�CC C O rnE€--. -' YYfiw C m - � � m. mV a •E a c R o_ o - U. mC 7.5 0 Ca V' CI n m CL m p N U � w NIS ,d IL (16 m w ui o' JO .7 n ' C apI C �N o Cl) C C C =;1 C7 mkmo °= H3H= 0 ,Parcel Number Propert Owner Mailing Address 34003 13TH CT SW� 9578140410 RUTVIJ BADSHAH 9578140100 CALVIN A BELL 33829 12TH PL SW 9578140370 BURTON FAMILY LIVING TRUST 1334 SW 340TH ST 9578140460 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PO BOX 9718 9578140470 f CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PO BOX 9718 9578140440 .JASON A AND TAMARA L CLEVER 34013 13TH CT SW 1821049064 CREA/LEGACY FEDERAL WAY LLC 7525 SE 24TH #180 1921049006 CREA/LEGACY FEDERAL WAY LLC 7525 SE 24TH #180 FEDERAL WAY LLC 1821049025 1CREA/LEGACY CO MARVIN F POER & CO 18818 TELLER AVE STE 277 9578140130 9578140110 1921049005 1921049053 1921049052 1921049033 9578140380 9578140400 1921049025 9578140420 9578140120 9578140140 9578140150 9578140160 9578140170 9578140180 9578140090 9578140450 9578140190 9578140200 9578140350 9578140340 9578140330 9578140320 9578140430 9578140360 9578140390 1921049031 9578140480 9578140510 VIVAN DANG JAMES W EVANS FAIRFIELD GLEN PARK LLC ATTN: TAX DEPT #1667 FED WAY SCHOOL DIST #210 FED WAY SCHOOL DIST #210 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS KYLE J AND LAURA A HARKIN _ MARK T AND THERESA M LIUENBERG OMEGA INTERNATIONAL INVESTM PHILIP R AND JO LYNNE PELLETIER QUADRANT CORPORATION QUADRANT CORPORATION QUADRANT CORPORATION QUADRANT CORPORATION QUADRANT CORPORATION QUADRANT CORPORATION QUADRANT CORPORATION QUADRANT CORPORATION QUADRANT CORPORATION QUADRANT CORPORATION QUADRANT CORPORATION QUADRANT CORPORATION QUADRANT CORPORATION QUADRANT CORPORATION QUADRANT CORPORATION _ ELIZABETH AND JOSHUA SCHNECK JULIUS W JR AND KYONG N TURNER STEVEN I WEISMAN C/O PETER PAN SEAFOODS INC _ WYNSTONE HOA ASSOC C/O WYNSTONE PROPERTIRES LLC WYNSTONE HOA ASSOC WYNSTONE PROPERTIES LLC 33907 12TH PL SW 33831 12TH PL SW — 5510 MOREHOUSE DR #200 31405 18TH AVE S 31405 18TH AVE S 31405 18TH AVE S. 1326 SW 140TH ST 1312 SW 340TH ST 19625 93RD PL NE 1911 SW CAMPUS DR #779 14725 SE 36TH ST #200 14725 SE 36TH ST #200 14725 SE 36TH ST #200 14725 SE 36TH ST #200 14725 SE 36TH ST #200 14725 SE 36TH ST #200 14725 SE 36TH ST #200 14725 SE 36TH ST #200 14725 SE 36TH ST #200 14725 5E 36TH ST #200 14725 SE 36TH ST #200 14725 SE 36TH ST #200 14725 SE 36TH ST #200 14725 SE 36TH ST #200 14725 SE 36TH ST #200 1404 SW 340TH ST 1320 SW 340TH ST PO BOX 16 City, State & Zip Code Federal Way, WA 98023 Federal Way, WA 98023 Federal Way, WA 98023 Federal Way, WA 98063 Federal Way, WA 98063 Federal Way, WA 98023 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Irvine, CA 92612 Federal Way, WA 98023 Federal Way, WA 98023 San Diego, CA 92121 Federal Wav, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98023 Federal Way, WA 98023 Bothell, WA 98011 Federal Way, WA 98023 Bellevue, WA 98006 Bellevue, WA 98006 Bellevue. WA 98006 Bellevue, WA 98006 Bellevue, WA 98006 Bellevue, WA 98006 Bellevue, WA 98006 Bellevue, WA 98006 Bellevue, WA 98006 Bellevue, WA 98006 Bellevue, WA 98006 Bellevue, WA 98006 Bellevue, WA 98006 Bellevue, WA 98006 Bellevue, WA 98006 Federal Way, WA 98023 Federal Wav, WA 98023 King Cove, AK 99612 6902 FORD DR NW IGig Harbor, WA 98335 6902 FORD DR NW Gig Harbor, WA 98335 !3©O JIVM 'Inga� J- 0 UD FIN 60 Ij0 DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC PO BOX 47703 -7703 sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov SEPA Optional DNS Notice and Checklist to the following agencies and tribes BRANDON REYNON PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPT 3009 E PORTLAND AVE TACOMA WA 98404 MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ATTN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWEF 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98092 Tamara Fix From: Tamara Fix Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 9:22 AM To: 'ECY RE SEPA UNIT' Subject: AT&T Saghalie NOA & Opt DNS Attachments: AT&T Saghalie DOE pkt.pdf Attached are the NOA and Optional DNS and Annotated Environmental Checklist for the above AT&T project. This NOA & Opt DNS is being issued on November 2, 2012, by the City of Federal Way. The Assistant Planner for the project is Becky Chapin, rebecca.chapin cityoffederalway.Eorn. ` 'antara ix -Ad-min -,Asst. City of federal"Way Lmara fix@cityo ffederafiyau.corn "When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile." Unknown 41k CITY '0';:tt2=P OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, �7 hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed Nfe-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on LC2� 2012. Project Name File Number(s) Signature Date K:\CD Administration Res\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /12/2012 2:20:00 PM CITY or Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION AND NOTICE OF OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: AT&T WA696 Project Description: Proposal to upgrade an existing Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) by replacing the existing 95' light pole with a 103' light pole and adding three new LTE 4G Antennas. Associated upgrades to the radio equipment within the equipment shelter are also included. Applicant: George Pierce, RYKA Consulting, 918 South Horton Street, Suite 1002, Seattle, WA 98134 Project Location: 33914 19t` Avenue SW, Federal Way Date Application Received: October 9, 2012 Date Determined Complete: October 26, 2012 Date of Notice of Application: November 2, 2012 Comment Due Date: November 19, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Required by This Application: Master Land Use Process III (File #12-104587-UP) and State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination (File #12-104588-SE) Other Permits Known at this Time and Not Included in This Application: Electrical Permit Existing Environmental Documents: None Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Review Known at this Time: Federal Way Revised Code Title 14, `Environmental Policy' and Title 19 `Zoning and Development Code.' Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Development by 5:00 p.m. on November 19, 2012. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party may appeal the environmental threshold determination. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional Determination of Nonsignificance. A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official kproject file is available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33325 8 Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325. Staff Contact: Becky Chapin, Assistant Planner, 253-835-2641 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on November 2, 2012. Doc LD. 62444 T m m m m 02 m 0 L -Cod Co r- 0 SLii� Fr am• m3 a yN r 7 'u� ro 7 m 0 m m a C-00 gEffE ��3Q 3 �MmU'r� � p p 4)11 mti nW o — 0 4 0.. � 3 Q�Q11 m df170�1 r- A N L r Wo a) a) a' s cM ❑ cU LL 2 mac= 9 0 m 0 03 0 ca d :? W o (n 00 c �CO oLO O NIr- I LL Tamara Fix From: Rudi Alcott <ralcott@fedwaymirror.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:03 AM To: Tamara Fix Subject: Re: AT&T Legal Notice Tamara, No problem. We will get this in for you. Thanks, Rudi Alcott Publisher Office: 253-925-5565, Ext 1050 Internal: 02-1050 Fax: 253-925-5750 Mobile: 253-336-5359 31919 1st Ave S, Ste 101, Federal Way, WA 98003 10i Sound Publishing, Inc. Map Print Rates Online Rates Media Kit Sound Info On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Tamara Fix <Tamara.Fi2�@cityoffederalway.com> wrote: Please publish the attached legal notice (AT&T NOA & Opt DNS, 12-104588) in Friday's (Nov 2, 2012) issue. Please confirm and issue an affidavit of publication. Tamara Fix City of Federal Way Tamera.f ix@ci of ederalwa .corn 253-835-2602 "Just think about how happy you'd be if you lost everything and everyone you have right now, and then somehow got everything back again." Kobi Yamada i CITY OF ' .. Federal Way November 1, 2012 George Pierce RYKA Consulting 918 South Horton Street, Suite 1002 Seattle, WA 98134 RE: File #12-104587-00-UP; NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION AT&T WA696 Saghalie Park, 33914 19th Avenue SW, Federal Way Dear -Mr. Pierce: iFILE CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www cityoffederalway. com On October 9, 2012, the City of Federal Way's Department of Community and Economic Development received your Process III Land Use application to modify the existing Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) by replacing the existing 93-foot light pole with a 103-foot light pole located on City owned Saghalie Park property. The proposal also includes adding 4 LTE 4G antennas to the new pole and associated upgrades to the ground equipment within the equipment shelter. The Comprehensive Plan designation is Parks and Open Space, and the zoning designation for the subject site is Multi -Family Residential (RM2400). Pursuant to the development application submittal requirements established in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.65, the City has 28 days to determine whether your application is complete. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Please consider this letter as a Notice of Complete Application. Pursuant to the FWRC, the application is deemed complete as of October 26, 2012, based on a review of your submittal relative to those requirements as set out in the Development Requirements checklist. The submittal requirements are not intended to determine if an application conforms to the City of Federal Way codes; they are used only to determine if all required materials have been submitted. Having met the submittal requirements, a Notice of Application and Optional Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) will be published in the Federal Way Mirror and posted at the subject property and on the City's official notice boards within 14 days of this letter. Notification will also be mailed to persons receiving property tax statements for property within 300 feet of the subject property. CLOSING A 120-day time line for reviewing the Process III application has started as of this date. The City has 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. However, the 120-day time line can be stopped at any time that the City requests additional information. You will be informed of the status of the 120-day time line when you are notified in writing that additional information is needed. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835-2641 or rebecca.chapin@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Be Assistant Planner ene_ NOA/DNS Doc. ED. 62443 CITY OF FILE Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION AND NOTICE OF OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: AT&T WA696 Project Description: Proposal to upgrade an existing Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) by replacing the existing 95' light pole with a 103' light pole and adding three new LTE 4G Antennas. Associated upgrades to the radio equipment within the equipment shelter are also included_ Applicant: George Pierce, RYKA Consulting, 918 South Horton Street, Suite 1002, Seattle, WA 98134 Project Location: 33914 19"' Avenue SW, Federal Way Date Application Received: October 9, 2012 Date Determined Complete: October 26, 2012 Date of Notice of Application: November 2, 2012 Comment Due Date: November 19, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used- This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Required by This Application: Master Land Use Process III (File #12-104587-UP) and State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination (File 912-104588-SE) Other Permits Known at this Time and Not Included in This Application: Electrical Permit Existing Environmental Documents: None Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Review Known at this Time: Federal Way Revised Code Title 14, `Environmental Policy' and Title 19 `Zoning and Development Code.' Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Development by 5:00 p.m. on November 19, 2012. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party may appeal the environmental threshold determination. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional Determination of Nonsignificance. A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33325 8 Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325. Staff Contact: Becky Chapin, Assistant Planner, 253-835-2641 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on November 2, 2012. Doc.I D. 62444 � » �o2�g 2�m C2 , c C, LL 0SP�22 -r§ �0)W) e e e � � .� U) cn (1) (D � F- 06 F= � ► <1Z R � 2 2 d� 06 � W oU) �o � 'IT co OU') � O � C� CD E � � RECEIVED Applicant: AT&T Mobility 1 OCT 0 2012 Prepared by: Ryka Consulting 19.255.020 Development st rrpsFFQEffkft1ability project WA696 NE Tacoma Project Address: 3391419'* Ave SW Parcel Number: 1921049050 The following development standards shall be followed in the design, siting, and construction of a personal wireless service facility: (1) Building- or structure -mounted PWSFs on existing buildings or structures in or out of the public right-of-way. PWSFs mounted on existing buildings and structures shall conform to the following development standards: (a) The PWSF shall consist only of the following types of facilities: (i) A microcell or a minor facility; or (U) A PWSF that exceeds the minor, facility thresholds for number of antennas, dimensions, and%r area, but creates no more adverse impacts than a minor facility, as determined by the director of community development services, subject to meeting all of the following standards: (A) The facility shall not create substantially more adverse visual impact than a minor facility; and (B) The equipment cabinet for the PWSF shall meet all requirements of subsection (4) of this section; and (C) The maximum size of the PWSF panels and number of antennas shall be determined by the director of community development sen�ices, based on the specific project location, surrounding environment, and potential visual impacts; and (D) The PWSF shall comply with all other applicable standards of the Federal Way Revised Code. Applicant Response: Applicant understands this modification request exceeds the minor facility standards, and will comply with (ii)(A-D) standards listed above. Furthermore, the Applicant presented design options to the City for comment, prior to submittal of this package. The proposed design within was the City's recommended option. (b) The combined antennas and supporting structure may extend up to, but not. exceed, 15 feet above the existing or proposed roof or other structure regardless of whether the existing structure is in conformance with the existing maximum height of the underlying zone as outlined in: the use zone charts, FWRC Title 19 Division VI, Zoning Regulations. Antennas may be mounted to rooftop appurtenances, as identified in FWRC 19.110.070, provided they do not extend beyond 15 feet above the maximum height of the structure as defined per FWRC 19. 0.5. 080, H definitions. Applicant Response: This modification proposal is requesting an 8' tower extension to allow the Applicant to install a new technology on the existing structure. The 8' extension is the minimum height increase necessary to support the new technology and prevent interference with existing technologies, and is within the allowed 15'. Furthermore, a recent tower engineering renort has determined that the existing Applicant: AT&T Mobility I Z Prepared by: Ryka Consulting Ik structure is not capable of supporting the additional antennae and 8' tower section. AT&T proposes to replace the existing structure with an 8' taller light standard pole which will mimic the existing structure's design. (c) For PWSFs located in the right-of-way, the combined antennas may extend rip to the minimum necessary height to meet safety clearances required by the operator of the existing structure, but not exceed 1 S feet above the existing structure, plus the height of the proposed antennas as specified in subsection (1) (e) of this section. The maximum allowable height of the new structure with the PWSF antennas shall be determined by the director of community development services, depending upon the antenna type, design, location on the structure, and the proposed method of attachment. An existing structure can be increased in height only once per a 12-month period. Any structure, whether a new or replacement structure, located in a public right-of-way must be similar in terms of size (except height), shape, color, material, and location to the existing and surrounding structures, as determined by the director of community development services. The antenna extension may be permitted regardless of whether the existing structure is in conformance with the maximum height of the underlying zone as outlined in the use zone charts, FWRC Title 19 Division VI, Zoning Regulations. Applicant Response: This modification proposal is not located within the right- of-way. (d) The antennas are mounted on the building or structure such that they are located and designed to minimize visual and aesthetic impacts to surrounding land uses and structures and shall, to the greatest extent practical, blend into the existing environment pursuant to subsection (3) of this section. Panel and parabolic antennas shall be screened from residential views and public rights -of -way carless meeting the provision of FWRC 19.110.070(2)(b). Applicant Response: This modification proposal, recommended by the City, will utilize "flush -mounting" techniques to limit visual and aesthetic impacts. (e) It is the applicant's responsibility to prove that the maximum size of the PWSF panels and number of antennas is the minimum size necessary. The maximum size of antennas to be located on existing structures in a public right-of-way shall be two feet in diameter for parabolic antennas, eight feet in height for panel antennas, and I5 feet in height for whip antennas. Applicant Response: This modification proposal is for the addition of three (3) new 4G LTE panel antennas. Provided within this application are the RF Engineer's statement and propagation maps which demonstrate the additional height is required to accommodate all three (3) of the Applicant's technologies, at the minimum height to service this area. (f) Required setbacks shall not pertain to PWSFs within public rights -of -way. Within residential zones, equipment enclosures, and buildings to house equipment cabinets 1 - - - ' - -7 - �- - - - - -- - '' -7 -' -- - ' - - ' ' ' - - - -T - _ - ... . _ • - - -' ' 7- 7 ! - -• ' - 7- ' - P - -I- . 17 -- - - - 1 - 71 Applicant: AT&T Mobility l 3 Prepared by: Ryka Consulting I applicable setback requirements for residential development of the underlying zone. For developed sites in nonresidential zones, the setback requirements for the equipment enclosure shall be those of the principal use of the subject property. For undeveloped sites in nonresidential zones, the setback requirements for the equipment enclosure shall be 20 feet for front, side, and rear yards. Applicant Response: As approved by the property owner, the replacement structure will be located within 10' of the existing structure but all setback minimum standards will be retained. The existing minimum setback from any property line is currently 188'. (2) New freestanding PWSFs. All requirements of the associated land use zoning charts must be met. Additionally, these structures shall conform to the following site development standards: (a) Placement of a freestanding PWSF shall be denied if placement of the antennas on an existing structure can meet the applicant's technical and network location requirements. Applicant Response: This modification proposal requires replacement of the existing freestanding PWSF due to engineering limitations of the existing structure. No other structures are available which would meet the same technical and network requirements and would also require the Applicant to site a new PWSF rather than modifying their existing location as proposed within. (b) Monopoles shall be the only freestanding structures allowed in the city; except that a lattice tower may be used to accommodate the collocation of four or more providers as part of a joint permit application. Applicant Response: The proposed replacement freestanding structure will be a monopole style ball field light pole. This will mimic the existing, approved structure except for the additional 8' of height as requested within. (c) In no case shall a freestanding PWSF be located closer than 500 feet to an existing freestanding PWSF whether it is owned or utilized by the applicant or another provider. Applicant Response: This modification proposal requires replacement of the existing freestanding PWSF due to engineering limitations of the existing structure. The Applicant does not request the siting of a new freestanding PWSF. (d) A freestanding PWSF, including the support structure and associated electronic equipment, shall comply with all required setbacks of the zoning district in which it is located. For developed sites, the setback requirements shall be those of the principal use of the subject property. For undeveloped sites, the setback requirements for new freestanding PWSFs shall be 20 feet for front, side, chid rear yards. Applicant Response: As approved by the property owner, the replacement Applicant: AT&T Mobility I 4 Prepared by: Ryka Consulting but all setback minimum standards will be retained. The existing minimum setback from any property line is currently 188'. (e) Freestanding PWSFs shall be designed and placed on the site in a manner that takes maximum advantage of existing trees, mature vegetation, and structures so as to: (i) Use existing site features to screen as much of the total PWSF as possible from prevalent views, and/or (ii) Use existing site features as a background so that the total PWSF blends into the background with increased distances. Applicant Response: This modification proposal requires replacement of the existing freestanding PWSF due to engineering limitations of the existing structure. All previous approval criteria are still met. Furthermore, the Applicant has provided a Viewscape Analysis as part of this application. (� In reviewing the proposed placement of a facility on the site and any associated landscaping, the city may condition the application to supplement existing trees and mature vegetation to more effectively screen the facility. Applicant Response: This modification proposal requires replacement of the existing freestanding PWSF due to engineering limitations of the existing structure. All previous approval criteria are still met. This proposal does not request the removal of vegetation or existing trees. (g) Support structures, antennas, and any associated hardware shall be camouflaged to blend in harmoniously within the existing site through the use of faux -structural designs, or when not technologically or aesthetically feasible, painted in a nonrejlective color scheme appropriate to the background against which the PWSF would be viewed from a majority of points within its viewshed. The proposed color or color scheme shall be approved by the hearing examiner or director of community development services. Applicant Response: This modification proposal requires replacement of the existing freestanding PWSF due to engineering limitations of the existing structure. All previous approval criteria are still met. The replacement structure will mimic the existing structure and will be designed as a light standard ball field structure. All antennae will remain flush -mounted. (3) Screening standards for all PWSFs. PWSFs shall be screened or camouflaged through employing the best available technology and design, as determined by the city. This may be accomplished by use of compatible materials, location, landscaping, color, stealth techniques such as, but not limited to, artificial trees and hollow flag poles, and/or other methods or techniques to achieve minimum visibility of the facility as viewed from public streets or residential properties. In addition, the provisions for landscaping as outlined in the use zone charts, FWRC Title 19 Division VI, Zoning Regulations, shall apply. Applicant: AT&T Mobility 1 5 Prepared by: Ryka Consulting I Applicant Response: The proposed design within was the City's recommended option. This modification proposal will utilize "flush - mounting" techniques along with painting to match existing antennas, or by direction of the City. (4) Standards for electronic cabinets. (a) Electronic cabinets shall either: (i) Be placed in anew or existing completely enclosed building. It is the applicant's responsibility to prove that the maximum size of the building is the minimum size necessary to house the equipment; or (ii) Be placed above ground in a new or existing equipment enclosure. It is the applicant's responsibility to prove that the maximum size of the building is the minimum size necessary to house the equipment. Applicant Response: The new ground equipment will be installed within the existing 12'x17-6' CMU equipment shelter, previously approved by the City. Furthermore, the existing shelter will not need to be expanded as part of this application proposal. (b) Equipment enclosures shall be screened with one or a combination of the following methods, which shall be acceptable to the city: fencing, walls, landscaping, structures, buildings or topography which will block the view of the equipment enclosure to the greatest extent possible from any street and/or adjacent properties, as determined by the director of community development services. Screening may be located anywhere between the enclosure and the above -mentioned viewpoints. Landscaping for the purposes of screening shall be maintained in a healthy condition, pursuant to FWRC 19.125.090(2). Applicant Response: The existing equipment shelter utilizes existing landscaping as previously approved by the City. (c) If the equipment cabinet is located within a new enclosed building, the building shall conform to all applicable development standards and design guidelines for the underlying zone. The enclosed building shall be architecturally designed and shall be compatible with existing buildings on the site. The enclosed building shall be screened to the greatest extent possible from any street and/or adjacent properties by landscaping and/or topography. Applicant Response: This modification proposal does not request that new equipment cabinets are installed a new enclosed building. (5) Standards for equipment enclosures. (a) Electronic equipment enclosures shall not be allowed within the right-of-way. Applicant Response: This modification proposal does not request that new equipment cabinets are installed within the right-of-way. (b) In residential zones, equipment enclosures located above ground on properties adjacent 1 _ .7_ - . _ . 7. 1, - _ 7. i - r . - . - I- - 77 .. _ - _ i - 17 - . _ -- 7 . - . 7. 7 _ - _ i 7. - _ 7 . . . :.. . . .. . . .. . P _ .. _. - - : _7 _ _ ..: -I Applicant: AT&T iUiobi:ity 6 Prepared by: Ryka Consulting development of the underlying zone. For developed sites in nonresidential zones, the setback requirements for the equipment enclosure shall be those of the principal use of the subject property. For undeveloped sites in nonresidential zones, the setback requirements for the equipment enclosure shall be 20 feet for front, side, and rear yards. However, for undeveloped sites in nonresidential zones, if the applicant can demonstrate that the equipment enclosure can blend in harmoniously with the existing site and complement the landscape buffer requirements of the underlying zone, as determined appropriate by the director of community development services, the equipment enclosure can be located inside of the 20 foot setback but outside of the required landscaping buffer of the underlying zone. Applicant Response: This modification proposal does not request additional ground space or equipment shelter relocation within the property, which would alter previously, approved designs and related setbacks. The existing minimum setback from any property line is currently 188'. (c) Equipment enclosures shall be designed, located, and screened to minimize adverse visual impacts from the public right-of-way and adjacent properties. Applicant Response: This modification proposal does not request a new equipment enclosure. (d) Equipment enclosures shall be designed, located, and screened to minimize adverse visual and functional impacts on the pedestrian environment. Applicant Response: This modification proposal does not request a new equipment enclosure. (e) Equipment enclosures and screening shall not adversely impact vehicular sight distance. Applicant Response: This modification proposal does not request a new equipment enclosure. (6) Security fencing. (a) No fence shall exceed six feet in height as stipulated in FWRC 19.125.160(5). Applicant Response: This modification proposal does not request a new fence. (b) Security fencing shall be effectively screened from view through the use of appropriate landscaping materials. Applicant Response: This modification proposal does not request a new fence. (7) Cumulative effects. The city shall consider the cumulative visual effects of PWSFs mounted on existing structures andlor located on a given permitted site in determining whether additional permits may be granted so as to not adversely affect the visual character of the Applicant: AT&T Mobility � 7 Prepared by: Ryka Consulting city_ Applicant Response: The Applicant understands and will comply with the City. Furthermore, the Applicant consulted the City on design preference prior to submitting this application. (8) Signage. No wireless equipment shall be used for the purpose of mounting signs or message displays of any kind, except for small signs used for identification, hazard warning, and name of provider. Applicant Response: The Applicant understands and will comply with the City. Furthermore, no new signage is requested as part of this proposal. (9) Use zone charts, height and permit process. (a) The final approval authority for applications made under this section shall be defined by the appropriate permit process as outlined in the use zone charts, FWRC Title 19 Division Vl, Zoning Regulations. Applicant Response: A request to the City to determine permit process was made on December 9t`, 2011 and a response was received on December 29h which stated a Process III land use decision, in conjunction with a SEPA review would be required. (b) Allowed heights shall be established relative to appropriate process as outlined in the use zone charts, FWRC Title 19 Division VI, Zoning Regulations. Applicant Response: This modification proposal is requesting an eight (8') foot tower extension to the existing PWSF, and per FWRC 19.255.020(b), the combined antennas and supporting structure may extend up to, but not exceed, fifteen (15') feet above the existing structure. AT&T WA696 PWSF —Specific Application Requirements George Pierce 1. Analysis of locating the PWSF in a higher priority location: Applicant Response: The existing PWSF is located on Federal Way Parks Department light standard pole at Saghalie Park, and this proposal requests the modification of the existing AT&T PWSF. Locating the proposed antennas in another location would require a new PWSF. 2. Inventory of other PWSF: Applicant Response: Not provided because the Applicant does not wish to relocate their existing PWSF for the purposes of modifying the existing PWSF antennas. 3. Above ground PWSF cabinets: Applicant Response: The above ground cabinets are currently located within an approved equipment shelter. The proposed ground equipment will be located within this equipment shelter, and exterior alterations to the shelter are not proposed. 4. PWSF cabinets located in the right-of-way: Applicant Response: Not Applicable; cabinets are not proposed within the ROW. 5. Documentation of efforts to collocate on existing facilities: Applicant Response: Not provided because the Applicant does not wish to relocate their existing PWSF for the purposes of modifying the existing PWSF antennas. 6. Signed statement allowing for collocation: Applicant Response: The Applicant does not own the subject wireless structure and cannot either allow or prevent future collocation, unless the future design impedes with the Applicant's transmission of radio frequencies. All future collocations would require approval of the tower owner, Federal Way Parks Department. RECEIVED OCT 09 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS 1 AT&T WA696 Analysis of FWRC 19.255.020[4] George Pierce Applicant responses to FWRC 19.255.020[4] facility camouflage or screening: RECEIVED Standards for electronic cabinets. OCT 09 2012 a. Electronic cabinets shall either CITY OF FEDERAL WAYCDS i. Be placed in a new or existing completely enclosed building. It is the applicant's responsibility to prove that the maximum size of the building is the minimum size necessary to house the equipment; or Applicant Response: All new equipment cabinets will be installed within the existing 12'-0"xl7'-6" ground mounted shelter. The existing shelter is of a LMU brick wall construction intended to blend into the surrounding area. ii. Be placed above ground in a new or existing equipment enclosure. It is the applicant's responsibility to prove that the maximum size of the building is the minimum size necessary to house the equipment. Applicant Response: All new equipment cabinets will be installed within the existing 12'-0"x17'-6" ground mounted shelter. This proposal does not request an expansion of the existing shelter. b. Equipment enclosures shall be screened with one or a combination of the following methods, which shall be acceptable to the city: fencing, walls, landscaping, structures, buildings or topography which will block the view of the equipment enclosure to the greatest extent possible from any street and/or adjacent properties, as determined by the director of community development services. Screening may be located anywhere between the enclosure and the above -mentioned viewpoints. Landscaping for the purposes of screening shall be maintained in a healthy condition, pursuant to FWRC 19.125. 090(2). Applicant Response: The existing shelter is of a LW brick wall construction intended to blend into the surrounding area. The Applicant does not propose an expansion of the existing, previously approved shelter. c. If the equipment cabinet is located within a new enclosed building, the building shall conform to all applicable development standards and design guidelines.for the underlying zone. The enclosed building shall be architecturally designed and shall be compatible with existing buildings on the site. The enclosed building shall be screened to 1 AT&T WA696 Analysis of FWRC 19.255.020[4] George Pierce the greatest extent possible from any street and/or adjacent properties by landscaping and/or topography. Applicant Response: Not Applicable: This proposal does not request a new building. 2 nu% u i U2 08: 12a L..1 RDRPT Y FBORING LOG rz•��► 206 654 7049 p.2 •"''�`' rvoMwast Tacrm Job Number : wA02 7E 98 OCATION . 339� 4 AveEwe Sot wit WA696-o3 Federal Way. WaWinoton cinquiar Wireless i3.rdan {.rfr+l Sc•gd pn 1 WA C.s4fEy.Mm: WA offf2lT91 a� s1rX.;Ift--s of grass Mi loose, brown iopsol wAadiain by WVAn% silly the SAND very der;se, moist, brovam Y. say. ew ,,, with gravet satq SAND YAM ardvel r i very , moist gray.** to rne&xm &4M Bnnngfarrn's�ated at 1&O feet tgs due to auger refusal 1- araangPa�,cs�� rrers,. `J �dd•ac1Ao.�f ru-fc �_ autletrr..... •. vats 21 z Sw .BSI ADAPT &vaa. w=Mwbn am TF� -ww. Fay.+ - c.-, —.n LT-:EiTl Very, choM dMirS aclkm w encm mmd at 7.0 Wb_gm w R RECEIVED OCT 0 9 2012 OY1' OF FEDERAL VVAy AMR Tw--[w••Np�TiQ•Ob••d NR Nft=mq ¢ago : ARD 04T dnx, IV 1 d 1 'r L-1Pd eY = TS.f V FOUNDATION GENERAL NOTES 15.Fonndation design assumes the reconmamdations in the referenced geoteciinicai report concerning verification of subsurface conditions are implemented prior to placement of concrete. 16. Foundation installation sbali be supervised by personnel knowledgeable and experienced with the proposed foundation type. Consinwbon shall be in accordance with generally accepted installation practices. 17.Foundation design assumes field inspections will be performed to verify that construction materials, installation methods and assumed design parameters are acceptable based on conditions existing at the site. 18.For foundation and anchor tolerances see drawing A810214. 19.Loose material shall be removed from bottom of excavation prior to concrete placement. Sides of excavation shall be rough and free of loose cuttings. 20.0oncrete shall be placed in a manner that will prevent segregation of concrete materials, infiltration of water or soil and other occurrences which may decrease the strength or durability of the foundation- 21.Free fall concrete may be used provided fall is vertical down without hitting sides of excavation, fomnwork, reinforcing bars, form ties, cage bracing or other obstructions. Lander no shall concrete fall through water_ - 22.Construction joints, if required in piers, trust be at least 12 inches (305 mm) below bottom of embedments and must be aaeutionally roughened to a full amplitude of 1/4 inch (6 mm). Foundation design assumes no other construction joints. 23.Top of foundation outside limits of anchor bolts shall be sloped to drain with a floated finish. Area inside limits of anchor bolts shall be level with a scratched finish. 24.Fxposed edges of concrete shall be charmfered 3/4" x 3 / 4 " (19mm x 19mm) minimum. 25.Foundation design assumes casing, if used, will not be left in place. Equipment, procedures and proportions of concrete mateials shall insure concrete will not be adversely disturbed upon casing removal. 26.Drilling fluid, if used, small be fully displaced by concrete and shall not be detrimental to concrete or surrounding soil. Contaminated concrete shall be removed from top of foundation and replaced with fresh concrete. r%urn ern e m i mr-i TENERA-L NOTES 1. Foundation design has been deveiopcd in accordance with generaLly a;A;epted processional engmeernng r..3es f rtr.4 ilk the QA7@7irP R 69J;) TIMVided. FO-EMdatioYi Clesim m&Wications may be rewired m the event the following design Para ueters are not applicable for the zgiwur ic.e conditions mcounivred. 3epth(ft) Soil Type Y-(Pci) " f)' Wcg'f ' r 't 13 ' wi= ill - 0.0-2.0 Sand. 5.0 70.0 25.0 0.000 0.000 2.0-5.0 Sand 248.0 132.0 40.0 0.000 0. 5.0-15.0 Sand 239.0 129.0 38.0 0.000 0.000 2. Work shall be in accordance with local codes, safety regulations and unless otherwise noted, the latest revision of ACI 318, 'Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete". Procedures for the protection of excavations, existing construction and utilities shall be established prior to foundation installation. 3. Concrete materials shall conform to the appropriate state requirements for exposed structural. concrete. 4. Proportions of coxcrete materials shall be suitable for the installation method utilized and shall result in durable concrete for resistance to local anticipated aggressive actions. The durability requirements of ACI 318 Chapter 4 shall be satisfied based on the conditions expected at the site. As a mini m'ma, concrete shall develop a mimmum compressive strength of 3500 psi ( 242 MPa) in 28 days. 5. Maximum size of aggregate shall not exceed size suitable for installation method utilized or 1/3 clear distance behind or between remfoxcing. Maxm mn size may be increased to 2/3 clear distance provided workability and methods of consolidation such as vgwating wilt prevent honeycombs or voids. 6. Reinforcement shall be deformed and conform to the requirements of ASTM A615 grade 60 unless otberwise noted. Splices in reinforcement shall not be allowed unless otherwise indicated. 7. Reinforcing cages shall be braced to retain proper dimensions wing handling and throughout placement of concrete. When temporary using is utilia..ed, bracing shall be adequate to resist forces ocruixing from flowing concrete during casing extraction- S . Welding is prohibited on reinforcing steel and embedments. 9. Minimum concrete cover for reinforcement shall be 3 inches (76 mm) unless otherwise noted. Approved spacers shall be used to insure a 3 inch (76 mm) minimuni cover on reinforcement. IO.Concrete cover from top of foundation to ends of vertical reinforcement shalt not excel 3 inches (76mm) nor be less than 2 inches (51mm). II.Spacers shall be attached intermittently throughout the entire length of vertical reinforcing cages to i insure concentric placement of cages in excavations. 12.Foundation design has been based on geotechnical report no.'WA02-7698 by ADAPT dated 04/19/02 13. Foundation depth indicated is based on the grade line described in the referenced geotechnical report. Foundation modification may be required in the event cut or fill operations have taken place subsequent to the geotechnical investigation. 14.Foundation design assumes level grade at pole site. nvrn -z.rn d A? i n?r--7 at&t May 29, 2012 TO: Ryka Consulting RE: Site WA696 NE Tacoma AT&T Mobility 16221 NE 72nd Way, RTC3 Redmond, WA 98052 www.att.com The above noted wireless facility that AT&T Mobility is currently operating is scheduled to go through a modification. We are required to add to current antennas on this facility. In some special cases in the AT&T network, although not prefer, we can deploy single antenna solution (one antenna per sector). However, in the site location we have spectrum constrain and the single antenna solution will result of loss existing 2G services. AT&T is committed to maintain same 2G services to the existing customers who may own 2G only phones. This is also critical for these customers to have emergency access anywhere within AT&T coverage area. AT&T needs to add additional antennas to enable the facility to operate on the new 4G service. Many of the existing 3G antennas are better left intact to minimize service outages to the public on the 3G network. Therefore, adding new ones is our only option which will subsequently add three antennas to the existing. To minimize the T-arm size, the 4G antennas can be flush mounted above the existing antennas. The site will comply with the public maximum permissible exposure (MPE) levels set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in all publicly accessible areas. These FCC rules constitute a national RF exposure standard that reflects the consensus agreement of the federal agencies charged with protecting the public health and the environment. Thank you for your consideration regarding this matter. Sincerely, 1 Amy Wang RF Engineer West Tower Communications AT&T PNW LTE Project 7525 SE 24th Street Suite 500, Mercer Island, WA 98040 RECEIVED OCT 09 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS WProud sponsor of the U5. OlymPJc Tp ■ I r+ 0 a f+ IML 0 Ul Ch 0 0 m Mi 1w to m 3 x r m m m v a IML to Ul Ch 0 Ic June 5, 2012 ATttT Mobility Corporation c/o: Mike McRitchie Westower Communications 7525 SE 24th Street Mercer Island, WA 98040 RE: Viewshed Analysis WA696 NE Tacoma 33914 19"' Avenue SW Federal Way, WA 98063 Dear Mike, RECEIVED OCT 09 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAy CDS LDC THE CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP Commercial Infrastructure Residential This letter is to describe the procedures used to perform the viewshed analysis for the WA696 NE Tacoma telecommunications site. The steps taken in this analysis follow below: 1. LDC obtained elevation data from King County for use in ArcGIS. The data set used in the analysis was the Digital Surface Model of King County. This model was derived from LiDAR and used it's first -return pulse, which measures the top -most layer of the terrain (such as the top of vegetation or buildings). 2. Using the Digital Surface Model data we used ArcGIS and it's Viewshed tool to calculate the area of visibility. The proposed height of the tower was set at 103' . 3. The area calculated by the Viewshed tool can be seen in Figure 2. 4. For Figure 1, we refined the area of visibility by removing areas that were clearly the tops of trees or buildings. In doing so, we were trying to show which areas in the vicinity of the site would have visibility to the tower from the ground level. Please contact us with any questions regarding the procedures used in this analysis. Regards, LDC, Inc. C Mark Villwock, PE Vice President 0 0 a s s 0 N W Z S N d ABOVE the Standard _.__E_n.gi neeri nga-..: s :, - wer hc n ��1 5/31/12 33914 1Ave SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 - Google Maps ^ ) Go,-sit. Address 33914 19th Ave SW Federal Way, WA 98023 AT&T Mobility Vicinity Map WA696 y � - _ath st sw 33oln s< sw 3201h St S 320th St sw V7 n $lti 323rd St ru m m N n m 9D � m $ g 4 r � SW 323fy,�, `� p O"Iplr. View m sW 328m St Elementary e S'h! 32BIh PI ww L Park i ind T' o Sg4 338(h St s [ ?� UJ SW 340th at Ii� 5`t'ti 3w 338tlr 5t �' SMnnl m r� SW 342,)d St r NE z co 4 Sherwood Forest sw a 3 ElementaryEF > a Pa:nth Lake $t' y Elementary Ft z school 3601 St NE m SW 3A'�eh Pl tVarpoird Way Ne " Enter ise Elementary School s 5r 3 m "' 297h St NE SW35BtJt St '� S1 5W 35®Ih St rn m _ 3 $443�� to S m S 3� .wh St Northeast co W2 Tacoma Map data @2012 Google; RECEIVED OCT 09 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS https:llmaps.goog le.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&g eocode=&q=33914+19th+Ave+SW,+Federal... Crn, OF FEDERAL WAY CDs King County Parcel Information Parcel Information Parcel #: 1921049050 Site Address: 1100 SW Campus Dr Federal Way WA 98023 Owner: Federal Way City OF PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98003 Phone: Township/Range/Section: T: 21N R: 04E S: 19 Q: NW Parcel Size: 16.0271 Acres (698,139 Sq Ft) Plat/Subdivision: Plat Volume/Page: / Lot: Block: Unit: Document #: 20081215000081 Census Tract/Block: 030310/3000 Waterfront: Waterfront Access/Footage: No / 0 Levy Rate: 13.62687 Total Land Value: $2,094,400 Total Impr Value: $0 Total Value: $2,094,400 Taxable Value: $0 RSt •a�+I rC, FirstAinerrcan Title Tax Information Tax Year Annual Tax 2012 $6,333 Legal Desc: POR GL 1 STR 19-21-04 DAF - BEG NW COR SD SEC TH ALG N LN THOF S 89-00-18 E 335.78 FT TH S 01-35- 16 Land Land Use: 301 - Vacant(Multi-family) Zoning: Federal Way-RM2400 - Multi -Family View: Sch Dist: Federal Way Improvement Year Built: 0 Build Type: - Stories: 0 Bedrooms: 0 Full Baths: 0 3/4 Baths: 0 Buildings: 0 A/C: Fin. Sq Ft: 0 Roof Covering: Ext. Walls: Roof Style: Pool: Carport Sq Ft: 0 Patio Sq Ft: 0 FirePlace: 0 Basement Desc: Commercial Improvement Building Type: - Use Code: Sprinkler %: 0 Cool: Complete %: 0 Trnr%cfor Tnfnrl71nfinn Map Grid: 744-G6 Water: PUBLIC Nbrhd: 55-50 Sewer: PUBLIC Bldg Use: - Bathrooms: 0.00 Half Baths: 0 Bsmt Fin/Unfin: 0/ Garage: 0 Deck Sq Ft: 0 Heat: - IG I U u Niz CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Sq Ft: GDS Light: - Rec. Date: 12/15/08 Sale Price: Doc Num: 20081215000081 Doc Type: Owner: I FEDERAL WAY CITY OF Grantor: Orig. Loan Amt:1 I I Title Co: Finance Type: I Loan Type: I I Lender: Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and Its customers make no representations, warranties or conditions, express or Implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained In this report. 20081215000081.ZZ a Return Address: ' City of Federal Way Attn: Kevin Peterson, Public Works 33325 8 h Ave S PO BOX 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 CITY OF FROM UD 45.00 KING COIJNTY, WA E2374111 12/15/2008 10:07 8Tp]G[ COUNTY, WA �10.00 5M $0.00 PAGE001 OF 001 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Grantor (s): City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation (Parks Department) Grantee (s): City Of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation Property Legal Description (abbreviated): Portion of Gov't. Lot 1, Sec. 19, TWP 21 N, R 4 E. W.M Additional Legal(s) on Exhibit A Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): 192104-9050 THE GRANTOR(S) City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation (Parks Department) for and in consideration. of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, conveys and warrants to the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, a Washington municipal corporation, all of its right, title and interest, and any after. acquired interest therein, in and to the following described real property situated in County of King, State of Washington: "Full legal description of Property attached hereto as Exhibit "A", as depicted in Exhibit "B", and incorporated herein by this reference." Description: %ing,WA Document - Year.Month.Day.DocID 2008.1215.81 Page: 1 of 4 Order: sample Comment: 20081215000081 _,_,. DATED THIS al day of C)G�C]bCK , 2002 GRANTOR City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation By: _ �>- 3U� Steve Ikerd, Parks and Facilities Manager PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 253.835.6911 STATE OF WASMNGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING } On this day personally appeared before me Steve ikerd, to me known to be the Parks and Facilities Manager of the City of Federal Way, Washington, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. GIVEN my hand and official seal is day of . 2006. T'-rm 'k-cr n tary signature) A "`��"."ulo& �jl, (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires i0—k\ 'c'd00R L:-%CSDCIDOCSISAVE127522924013.doc G:1lawfonnMeed.ed 7/05 Description: King,WA Document - Year.Month.Day.DoclD 2008.1215.81 Page: 2 of 4 Order: sample Comment: 20081215000081_ Exhibit "A" 10th Avenue Southwest Road Dedication Description That portion of Government Lat 1, Section 19, Township 21 north, Mange 4 east, W.M., in King County, Washington, said portion being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 19, thence along the north line thereof South 89°00' 18" East 335.78 feet; Thence South 01 °35' 16" West 42.00 feet to the southerly line of the lands described in deed recorded under Recording Number 9501170665, records of King County and the True Point of Beginning; Thence along said southerly margin south 89100118" East 18.07 feetto the beginning of a curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 658.00 feet; Thence easterly and southeasterly 700.54 feet along said curve through a central angle of 60°59'59"; Thence continuing along said margin South 26000'19" East 422.43 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 842.00 feet; Thence southeasterly 217.49 feet along said curve through a central angle of 14°47'59" to a radial line of said curve which bears South 47°l 1'42" West; Thence leaving said margin along the non -tangent line of said Government Lot South 01013'12" West 390.17 feet to the southeast corner thereof; Thence along the south line of said Government Lot North 88159'20" West 938.71 feet to a line parallel with and distant 335.76 feet easterly, when measured at right angles, from the west line of said Government Lot; Thence along said parallel line North 01 1135'16" East 1273.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Situate in King County, Washington. More particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of said Section 19; thence South 00027'47" West, along the west line thereof, a distance of 1314.80 feet to the north line of Government Lot 2 of said Section 19; thence North 89°5349" East, along said north line, a distance of 712.18 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 897.03 feet and a central angle of 33"50'03" and being subtended by a chord which bears North 30°59`40" East 522.05 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve, a distance of 529.71 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing northeasterly a distance o€203.04 feet along the arc of said curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 897.03 feet and a central angle of 12"58'08" to the southerly margin of Southwest Campus drive; thence North 29007' 10" West, along said southerly margin, radial to said curve, a distance of 80.76 feet to a point of cusp on a curve concave to the west having a radius of 50.00 feet and a central angle of 80051'55" and being subtended by a chord which bears South 11"1849" West 64.86 feet; 19 thence southwesterly along said curve, a distance of 70.57 feet to a �- point of reverse curvature; H thence southwesterly a distance of 169.05 feet along the arc of said Q�E WAS h'd curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 500.00 feet and a central angle of 19'22' 18" to the True point of Beginning. o ,� 38965 e �srQ�SLT�tos EXPIRES S 23 0 Description: King,WA Document - Year.Month.Day.DoclD 2008.1215.82 Page: 3 of 4 Order: sample Comment: 20081215000081.== Exhibit "B" 10th Avenue Southwest Road Dedication A2 \ X ' � pwn d try � cT� A'L r \ 60'�, ti,'• P S 3 • �' \ D' 4�247 S, r r TRUE POINT �, r OF BEGINNING-, \ EAST LINE OF PARCEL "A" ROS NO.9108129010 a �+ 3$965% a!kw y� L AO EXPIRES 5,12y /'Wq Description: Sing,WA Document - Year.Month.Day.Doc2D 2008.1215.82 Page: 4 of 4 Order: sample Comment: 1S——, 9050 '6'�I-5,0 N This map has been copied from the public records and is provided solely for the A purpose of assisting in locating the premises. No liabilities are assumed for JL inaccuracies contained herein or for variations, if any, in dimensions, area or location of the premises or the location of improvements ascertained by actual survey. 'n Opv 38.74 S R-50 \ 70.57 a�,\ l7it g.1I1O % ✓o °oasa i TR-C $� y� �✓ COMM PROP w / 10 0. j 11 0T00: I y 540s1 1.•,s 'J i 0110 147s71 �• 0480 n L FAO ct" 3s I 35 125190t ..,_�`�,. a" TRA v a120 ! 9.22 s.. 1alaA 0�45 13 .,ax (U 4 1 57964 n• j u'A pp � 0130 .,.1 � v`3 J e l3. �m � 9 51afS9Q yn� I a0 14 718f0140 tolo L ry1i3 _ 5 5150 r� r$ 7 olsa j ha iN y 7 s1s01 45 1 18 6016E` I03 p07[I 698139t i 71 �V 26I 26 ri., 6 51500 9.82 AC 16.03 AC N 17 6311A r 0060 10, 9033 9050 0170 1. 430474 s _a 1-0� T.= 0450 1 u 5 50050 2.16 yi ; ^i• 26441 _ . aa.. , • � q, 71471 KCC-93-2036698 ui.i3 l51 �1y, 79 1B ry pp .W 30@ ? we 9052 4t•Ss 3^ �� 7s66{ "4y 4 7276t g \�`p 0180 �I �� •,'` voc. p° 7539A \ 1,r 4.'~r 0040 3 old 44 43 42 +'r 0190 , . �� , Q4'4a� 356391 ..ew 41� •L fy% f • m ,@ m{� .� •s 9053 0 •y9•a 11055A F100266 au 7zsat 20 �!� �� 3 0440 0430 70420 0410 7425t ��'�s �+��• a 1 L03.85 \•Ono.^•� "" �Q.1 z- 72 6\ 26 O Lip+ .P 72971 q9,j ti6 A4v ,,�,• 7. l�,rt, •1 tii •'0030 2 35 mr. • ��DRvi ' 37 38 38 40dg: 7215! a:a 'W J,.+o •s' y� 83174 3B565 9F �� { Q35� �•'•' 72p z.:?M$ " %s a120011 a .� 7200k „raw 76984 0400 J Y.f •�,!` - 0020 $ .. v3a0 0390 sw NO 03M 9025 ,, 311. �.�� 7 x., 72 234 N89-53-91E 243.97 pn 6 1212t 76060 ti M1 33 1•a C01LK ME T� -------S1V 340-fg:gr •— -- 6'+• .mro 02100340 'L 156as1 72034 a x 5\s5 0011 -72299 fir[ a.. A 20 61.11 4 25 's 02.ZO '' ✓ 0330 5R$ �y n," x" ✓ 23 s ,a ` 04� s 32N 31 30 29 28�r N 76041 62a7f as ?�rr �° Ea R w e 28 27 v?$0 ONO 20350 �8 TRG 164760 7204k 72014 7213t c� 9031 Com PROP 0500 0 ti'q 72124 �,'." 75051 .. 0290 0280 72141 74s71 \ L75 y GM 0300 88-53-4U 1012.904? m.v Q70 0260 •Nc 24 12360A 'p ONO w t 272 6160 SF 25S.SI Ti;.21 �u i} 3:5 '04 9028 63120 •' F psgp • It %C6 0 P 2Bt __1 124.54 l 1 19 0190 r. 334.7: L7. a-p: 109.e4 48.38' i•,�y� Y ^m21 r '1 Cp 1• 14 523918 0180� E 59351 0210 Tr ; r 115.76 w� Tr B j 62411 17 zo �a �y� Open Space Tr >. 0170 z� e• LL I CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 16, 2012 TO: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Scott Sproul, Plans Examiner Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Becky Chapin FOR DRC MTG. ON: No meeting, please email completeness comments. FILE NUMBER(s): 12-104587-00-UP RELATED FILE NOS.: None PROJECT NAME: AT&T WA696 SAGHALIE PARK PROJECT ADDRESS: ZONING DISTRICT: 33914 19Th Ave SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace 95' light pole with a 103' light pole. Relocate existing antennae and add LTE4G antennae to new pole. LAND USE PERMITS: Process III w/ SEPA PROJECT CONTACT: George Pierce RYKA Consulting 918 Horton St. Suite 1002 Seattle, WA 98134 MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Master Land Use Application Vicinity Map Title Report Development Standards Analysis Environmental Checklist Viewshed Analysis Coverage Map Boring Log Site Photos Site Plan CITY of Federal way Parks and Facilities Division Date: September 10, 2012 RECEIVED To: Rachel Titus OCT 09 2012 From: Stephen lkerd, Parks & Facilities Manager CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Subject: Authority to submit permits in regards to: Site Number: WA696 / NE Tacoma Site Address: 3391419th Avenue S, Federal Way 98023 — (the "Property) This letter grants authority to submit permitting applications for AT&T; to replace the existing light standard and add (3) LTE antennas to their facility located at the address listed above. Attached are the Construction Drawings an Illumination Analysis the Parks Department had asked for to better understand the scope of the project. The City of Federal Way Public Works Department is still reviewing the photometric layouts in detail but it appears the calculations Oscar Fuentes performed previously are within the lighting standards to warrant proceeding with the permitting applications for the proposed changes. We want to make it clear that we will expect a field test report to verify that the illumination levels on the field were met after construction. In a previous e-mail; The Parks Department required that the new pole will not restrict access between the current building and the associated soccer field north fence. In addition we need an 8' clearance around the pole to be able to mow and the old cement base needs to be lowered to at least 12" below grade. Sincerely, Stephen Ikerd City of Federal Way Parks & Facilities Manager MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION i J'�:,r— CITY OF 41- Federal Way APPLICATION NO(s) RE-ClEIVED l 00 2012 CM OF FEDERAL WAY CDS 12 -- 104-58 9- _C0 s� IZ- 1045 -7-o0 UP Project Name 4T&T W A IKU DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.61 offederalwa +.cons Date l O /q 1119-- Property Address/Location -11 7-h - - — Parcel Number(s) Project Description a iK ; e�CY E �, G to p4r_a f n n PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI - SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision _ Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information R. N - a �,qd Zoning Designation oatl `tComprehensive Plan Designation L dOoValue of Existing Improvements 3 Coo Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): (% Occupancy Type �C�Cy�au►.rQtl eu�, s Construction Type Applicant Name:0 r.lYsS PGS, 11G oba k+4-1 #odih+y� Address: 16 2 11 Al C 7 d 'J iv ky A T- 4 3 City/State: Rx� � J , W h Zip: q$0S I Phone: log, $' a 3. i ct 4 j Fax: )�06• )q Email: A, Signature: S', q �V' Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: 6-wa6a 1Q,ma Address: 91A S. hiorto u SI City/State: SFk-rT1 s , Lo l Zip: -9$131-t Phone: aa6•S�3. lg4J Fax: jo`. Ai& 713o STir /D02 Email: (;frEfte hCoNSvLT1N5 Signature: Owner . C a''^ Name: C;t7 (J by Address: 3 3 3 x g^ S 5 AV6 S City/State: �f�„•� t„�� Zip: 1$0d 3 Phone: a ? . S3 5 . �70 1 Fax: 0 A Email: -('r&-V6,ThrAQ & e;.ry o�ecder ti w Ry, Corr, Signature: � qa A'c �tAt! SP Bulletin #003 - January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application George Pierce From: Rebecca Chapin Rebecca.Chapin@cityoffederalway.comRECEIV Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 1:42 PM RECEIVED To: George Pierce OCT ®9 Z��Z Subject: RE: AT&T Projects CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Hi George, CDS Your request for Preapplication meeting waiver has been approved. Per Federal Way Revised Code 19.40.030(2)(a), due to the simple nature of the proposal, and because the site has previously undergone a preapplication conference and site plan review for a similar development proposal, your request for waiver of the required preapplication conference is hereby approved. Please be advised that this waiver of preapplication review may increase the risk of the application being incomplete or that the processing time will be increased. It is best to schedule an intake appointment with the permit center by email. The best times for intake are Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday mornings around 8:15 -8:30. Just let them know you need to schedule intake for a Process III and SEPA review. Contact the permit center at ermitcenter cit offederalwa .com or by phone at 253-835-2607. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Becky Chapin Assistant Planner Community and Economic Development City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253-835-2641 Rebecca -Chapin ci offederalwa .com From: George Pierce[mailto:GPierce@rykaconsulting.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 9:49 AM To: Rebecca Chapin Subject: RE: AT&T Projects Hi Rebecca, The AT&T WA415 project (12-101877-00-UP) received approval this week, and I am now preparing the UPIII+SEPA(DNS) Zoning package for the WA696 project. WA696 (Saghalie Park) is the project where AT&T is going to modify their existing PWSF as recommended by the City. I see that a pre -application meeting is required, but I would request a pre -application meeting waiver under: FWRC 19.40.030(2)(iii) The site has previously undergone pre -application, site plan or other land use review for the same or similar development proposal and it is unlikely further pre -application review will provide any benefit to the city or applicant; I also see that I need to schedule my intake appointment. Are there particular days that work best for your team? - . �k CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8"' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 RECEIVE® 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoFfederaIway.com OCT 0 9 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY �nn'j,•d �� CDS `r ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST $,ty v, ` toiv'ry PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Chapter 43.21C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non -Project Actions. For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Bulletin #050 —January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 18 k:\Iiandouts\Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: AT&T Mobility WA696 2. Name of applicant: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (d.b.a. AT&T Mobility) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: 16221 NE 72nd Way Contact 918 S. Horton St. Redmond, WA 98052 Person: Seattle, WA 98134 206.523.1941 4. Date checklist prepared: 6/6/2012 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way Planning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Single phase construction; Estimated start date of 9/10/2012 and will require 2-3 weeks to complete. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Because this proposal is for the modification of an existing use and ground disturbance is not required, no other environmental information has been prepared other then this SEPA Checklist. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 2 of 18 kAHandoutsTrivironmental Checklist 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Federal Way Planning Process III Land Use decision. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The Applicant proposes to add 3 new panel antennas to a replacement light standard monopole located within Saghalie Park, Federal Way, WA. The replacement light standard pole will be 8' taller to support the new panel antennas. Existing pole height: 95'; Proposed pole height: 105'. Additionally, the Applicant proposes to install new radio equipment within their existing 12'x17.5' equipment shelter. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 33914 19th Avenue SW, Federal Way, WA 98063 519 T21N R04E Q-N/E The AT&T facility is located on the northern area of the 16.14 acre subject parcel. The subject parcel is listed as the Saghalie Park, but is zoned Residential (RM-2400), and it's primary use is for two ball fields. Access to the subject parcel is through the adjacent middle school property as addressed above. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS l O wy VV4 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one) flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The entire parcel is generally flat minus the very northern end which slopes towards SW 336th St. This slope is likely man-made to build up the surface for the ball fields. 15-20% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. A recent boring log described the first 15' of soil as sand with grass/loam on top. The boring report described some gravel mix towards the 15' level and the auger was unable to continue due to soil conditions. Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 3 of 18 kAHandouts\Environmental Checklist d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No indications of unstable soil conditions were observed during the May 29th, 2012 field visit. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None proposed. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No impervious surfaces proposed or affected. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. None proposed. 2. AIR C VVA atckla a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. General construction vehicle emissions. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known. Bulletin #050 —January 1, 2011 Page 4 of 18 kAflandoutsTnvironmental Checklist c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. None proposed. l 3. WATER a. Surface. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Per the Federal Way Critical Area Map (June, 2008) there is a stream to the north of the subject parcel; a small body of water to the East of the subject parcel, and a described wetland to the southwest of the subject parcel. All the described bodies of water above appear to be associated with the Hylebos Creek drainage basin; which eventually flows into Commencement Bay. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None proposed. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None proposed. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Per the King County Critical Areas designations, the subject parcel is not located within a 100 year floodplain. Bulletin #050 —January 1, 2011 Page 5 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the systems) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including stormwater) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. No runoff is expected during construction and once the facility is operational. The subject parcel has an existing stormwater system in place. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No waste materials will be produced. Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 6 of 18 kAflandoutsEnvironmental Checklist d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any, None. 4. PLANTS CerC(Ar Vi /N C% St a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site. VO" deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass _ pasture _ crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plant. water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. None. Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 7 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist 5. AN1mm s C,ct4r 0:�n G ii a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. birds: awk heron, eagle. origbird.. other mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. None known. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. None as part of this proposal. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Existing electrical connection. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. Bulletin #050 —January 1, 2011 Page 8 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. The existing and proposed radio equipment's electrical usage is load balanced based on network traffic usage. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH C a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. The existing, approved battery back-up system is designed in accordance to local and state laws, and was previous reviewed and approved by the Federal Way Fire Marshal. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. Battery containment systems as previously approved. b. Noise. 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. No long-term noise will be created that exceeds state and local levels. The will be short- term noise related to construction, but due to the location of the facility it is unlikely that this noise will effect nearby properties. The closest properties are across a major roadway and there is also a barrier of trees. All construction activities will take place during normal working hours as required by the local jurisdiction. Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 9 of 18 k:lHandouts\Environmental Checklist 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. None. IL ct�,V 1�4� C�J*i 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE u" a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The subject parcel's primary use is for recreational ball fields, tennis courts and a play area. The secondary use is the Wireless Facility (this proposal). The surrounding properties consist of a Middle School, multi -family, and single family residences. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. None know. c. Describe any structures on the site. Play area with play equipment, small stadium seating for the ball fields, and the Wireless Facility equipment shelter. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Residential: RM-2400 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Parks and Open Spaces Bulletin #050 —January 1, 2011 Page 10 of 18 k:\Handouts\Envimnmental Checklist g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an environmentally critical area? If so, specify. None, per the city of Federal Way Critically Sensitive Area map. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The existing facility and proposed modification meets the criteria of the Federal Way comprehensive plan and all requirements of the respective development code. 9. HOUSING CaYtCUY W0 C�41igt a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None. Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 11 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None. � � v✓�i� G�2 G�� i St 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 105' AGL. Non -reflective steel finish. The existing equipment shelter is of LMU block construction with a pitched roof. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None, per the Viewshed modeling performed by the civil engineering firm of record. King County elevation data and digital surface model were used to complete the Viewshed report. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. As recommended by the Federal Way Planning department, AT&T will increase the structure by 8' and flush -mount the new antennas in a similar fashion to the existing antennas. The city recommended this design over using t-arms and mounting the antennas at the same level as the existing antennas. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE C�1 j/u r w� Cr`e`T"w �- a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. All antennas, tower mounted equipment and the light pole are produced with a non - reflective material. Bulletin #050 —January 1, 2011 Page 12 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. None. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Two (2) ball fields, a tennis court and a children's play area are located on the subject parcel. There is also a walking path around the perimeter of the subject parcel. b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. None. Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 13 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist CX ,tar wkk GkaM19t 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. The subject parcel and adjacent parcels have been developed previously. A number of new residential construction is underway along the East to South area of the subject parcel. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None. l(517 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The ball fields and other areas of the subject parcel as serviced by access from 19th Ave SW; via parking within the middle school parking lot on the adjacent parcel. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The middle school has a nearby bus stop. The Wireless Facility is approximately 1000' from the bus stop. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not required. Unmanned facility. Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 14 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. On average 1-2 trips per month for inspection and maintenance. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. None. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES � 6nCu r W►� Cl.ec�<< S a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 15 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. Mums a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: e ectrici natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other (please list) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. SIGNATURE: DATE SUBMITTED: 6/12/2012 Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 16 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist WOF96 NE Tacd Photo �"'► z . :-• 1. A;, �;,r r•t -=x•,'•��. • yr . r . v. tog, • �z , r� a♦ r 1 ] ','1 a : 1 4 1 '_il 116) 111 f 19 i■] 1 Light Pale 470 17' 59.5" N 122° 21' 11.8" W 344' AMSL of Federal Way tv Park v ti Issue Date: 5-31-12 ITIVI: (4wo) O ." ,Tower ti Photo it x r .... odor, Y�: � . •ram, . , 1]'I'I =: I1.14 >YlI.[=1N1UI VLlglit Pole 103'_0" 70 17` 59.5" N 1220 21' 11.8" W A. k 344' AMSL r C� of Federal Way r Park Issue Date: 5-31-12 II I: Photo r JL Tower Ar � f ` 'Lit 1ir� -`o� 4 -x&,j-w. w I Ifs C� Light Pole 103'_0" fd 17' 59.5" N 122 21' 11.$" W s 344' AMSI, 1 0 of Federal Way 1 Park VMS 0 Tower's h i7pxa :l lf: •1'1'I =1 *, I e fight Pole a3,_0:. 76 17' 59.5" N 122" 21' 11.8" W MMM344'AMSL f Federal Way Park Tower hoto loll WMM Y OdIph I If, ilo� v ti r] •Aa� W J.1 6, PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AT&T MOBILITY CORPORATION SERVICES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. z- s o ,n z f S 3rWth St � Steeifrtske" y; Federal Way steel Lake Park S 320t �r_lpklrfltlOR ..'� Park v, Q PROJECT — L c� 1y D A) S 346th at - - n b Norpoani Way ✓ D 'r m SW 356th at SW 3SOh St Northeast Tacoma s k �J f tP Q �r WO VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE DRIVING DIRECTIONS FROM SEA-TAC AIRPORT: • HEAD SOUTH e KEEP RIGHT AT THE FORK AND MERGE ONTO AIRPORT EXPRESSWAY • KEEP RIGHT AT THE FORK AND MERGE ONTO WA-518 E • TAKE THE EXIT ONTO 1-5 S • TAKE EXIT 142B TO MERGE ONTO WA-18 W TOWARD S 348TH ST • CONTINUE ONTO S 348TH ST • CONTINUE ONTO SW CAMPUS DR • TURN LEFT ONTO 19TH AVE SW • DESTINATION WILL BE ON THE LEFT at&t Your world. Delivered. NE TACOMA WA696 33914 19TH AVENUE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT CONTACT LIST CODE INFORMA TION: ZONING CLASSIFICATION: CITY PARK BUILDING CODE: 2009 IBC CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 1113 OCCUPANCY: S-2 JURISDICTION: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PROPOSED BUILDING USE: TELECOM SITE LOCATION INAD83): LATITUDE: 47017'59.5" N (47.299861° N) LONGITUDE: 122-21'11.8" W (122.353278- W) TOP OF STRUCTURE: 44T AMSL 103'-0" AGL BASE OF STRUCTURE: 344' AMSL 0'-0" AGL PROJECT LEASE AREA: PARCEL NUMBER: ±222.9 SF 1921049050 NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA: AREA OF PARCEL: 0 SF 16.14 ACRES GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. PARKING REQUIREMENTS ARE UNCHANGED. 2. TRAFFIC IS UNAFFECTED. 3. SIGNAGE IS UNCHANGED. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: AT&T MOBILITY CORPORATION PROPOSES TO MODIFY AN EXISTING UNSTAFFED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY WITH THE REPLACEMENT OF (3) PANEL ANTENNAS WITH (6) NEW PANEL ANTENNAS, (6) RRH UNITS, AND (1) RAYCAP DC SURGE SUPPRESSION BELOW ANTENNA LEVEL. ALSO THE ADDITION OF (1) LTE 9926 BBU TO AN EXISTING FIF RACK WITHIN THE EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER, AND (1) GPS ANTENNA ON EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER. ALSO THE REPLACEMENT OF A 95'-0" STEEL LIGHT POLE WITH A 103'-0" LIGHT POLE. UTILITY COMPANIES POWER: TELEPHONE: TBD CENTURY LINK PHONE: (800) 777-9594 APPROVAL / SIGN OFF OF FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS 3 a 0 APPLICANT. - AT&T MOBILITY CORPORATION RTC BUILDING 3 16221 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 PROJECT ENGINEER: LDC, INC. 14201 NE 200TH ST, SUITE 100 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072 CONTACT: MARK VILLWOCK, P.E PHONE: (425) 806-1869 FAX: (425) 482-2893 PROJECT SURVEYOR: LDC, INC. 14201 NE 200TH ST, SUITE 100 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072 CONTACT: GARY LEWIS, PLS PHONE: (425) 806-1869 FAX: (425) 482-2893 RF ENGINEER: CONTACT: ARMITPAL SINGH as230b@att.com PHONE: (425) 698-7840 PROJECT CONSULTANT: WESTOWER COMMUNICATIONS 7525 SE 24TH ST, SUITE 500 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 STRUCTURE OWNER: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33325 8TH AVENUE S FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 CONTACT: CARY ROE PHONE: (253) 835-2710 PROPERTY OWNER: DRAWING INDEX DWG NO. DESCRIPTION T-1 TITLE SHEET G-1 GENERAL NOTES G-2 GENERAL NOTES AND SYMBOLS A-1 SITE PLAN A-2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN A-3 ELEVATION A-4 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS RF-1 ANTENNA CONFIGURATIONS RF-2 RF DETAILS E-1 SCHEMATIC GROUNDING PLAN E-2 GROUNDING DETAILS CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33325 8TH AVENUE S FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 CONTACT: CARY ROE PHONE: (253) 835-2710 PROJECT MANAGER: CONTACT: MIKE MCRITCHIE mmcritchie@westower.com PHONE: (425) 760-9835 SITE ACQUISITION / PERMITTING CONTACT: RYKA CONSULTING ATTN: GEORGE PIERCE 918 S HORTON ST, SUITE 1002 SEATTLE, WA 98134 PHONE: (206) 523-1941 gpierce@rykaconsulting.com CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: CONTACT: RON EVENSON revenson@westower.com PHONE: (206) 550-9322 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1921 U4 5U F UK (31- 1 5 I K 19-21-04 DAF - BEG NW COR SD SEC TH ALG N LN THOF S 89-00-18 E 335.78 FT TH S 01-35-16 W 42 FT TO SLY MGN OF LAND DESC IN REC #8501170665 & TPOB TH ALG SD SLY MGN S 89-00-18 E 18.07 FT TO BEG OF NON TAN CRV CONCAVE TO SE RAD OF 897.03 FT (A RADIAL LN THRU SD BEARS N 28-00-19 W) TH SWLY & SLY 732.77 FT ALG SD CRV THRU A C/A OF 46-48-15 TO A RADIAL LN OF SD CRV WCH BEARS N 74-48-38 W & S LN OF SD GL 1 TH ALG SD S LN N 88-59-20 W 376.79 FT TO A LN PLW & DIST 335.76 FT ELY WHEN MEAS AT R/A FR W LN OF SD GL TH AGL SD PLL LN N 01-35-16 E 1273 FT TO TPOB AKA PCL A PER SEG PETITION LTR DTD 07-21-91 CITY OF F W LAND USE RECEIVED OCT 09 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS 4 Call 2 Business Days Before You Dig 1-800-424-5555 Utilities Underground Location Center (ID,MT,ND,WA) Commercial Infrastructure L IJ Lo Residential THE CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP Telecom 14201 NE 200th St., #100 Ph. 425.806.1869 Woodinville, WA 98072 Fx. 425.482.2893 www.LDCcorp.com DATE: 10-28-11 DRAWN BY: VJT CHECKED BY: RJA REVISIONS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 1 10-28-11 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION RJA 2 02-07-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION RJA 3 6-05-12 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION MEV 4 8-14-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 5 9-20-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 6 9-28-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV E• . �4 pF WASgjLh'� 40908 ISM - SITE WA696 NE TACOMA 33914 19TH AVENUE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 SHEET TITLE 77 F _ TITLE SHEET1 SHEET NUMBER T=1 E a 0 N o; I N 0 N 0 U 0 -6 0 0 v 0 1 0 I I 0 ro N i 0 V L co C 0 0 .3 II L 0 i II E 0 U a W z a I t- Q GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY TOWER NETWORK CARRIER OF ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INCONSISTENCIES AS THEY MAY BE DISCOVERED IN PLANS, DOCUMENTS, NOTES, OR SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED BY, DEMOLITION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECTING ANY ERROR, OMISSION, OR INCONSISTENCY AFTER THE START OF CONSTRUCTION WHICH HAS NOT BEEN BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF TOWER NETWORK CARRIER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER AND SHALL INCUR ANY EXPENSES TO RECTIFY THE SITUATION. THE MEANS OF CORRECTING ANY ERROR SHALL FIRST BE APPROVED BY TOWER NETWORK CARRIER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER. 2. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, CONTRACTORS INVOLVED SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE TO FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE PROPOSED PROJECT. CONTRACTORS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR HAVING BEEN AWARDED THIS PROJECT SHALL VISIT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO VERIFY FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONFIRM THAT THE PROJECT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN. PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION, ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER VERBALLY AND IN WRITING. 3. FOR COLLOCATION SITES: CONTACT TOWER OWNER REPRESENTATIVE FOR PARTICIPATION IN BID WALK. 4. DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED, WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE, THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS INTENDED TO BE USED FOR DIAGRAMMATIC PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, LABOR, AND ANY REQUIREMENTS DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE PROJECT AS DESCRIBED IN THE DRAWINGS AND OWNER'S PROJECT MANUAL. 5. THE ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS HAVE MADE EVERY EFFORT TO SET FORTH IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTORS BIDDING THE JOB ARE NEVERTHELESS CAUTIONED THAT MINOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORS IN THE DRAWINGS AND OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT EXCUSE SAID CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLETING THE PROJECT AND IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THESE DOCUMENTS. THE BIDDER SHALL BEAR THE RESPONSIBILITY OF NOTIFYING (IN WRITING) THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS, ERRORS, OR OMISSIONS PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL. IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRICE THE MORE COSTLY OR EXTENSIVE WORK, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE. 6. DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE. TOWER NETWORK CARRIER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERRORS RESULTING FROM THIS PRACTICE WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALE SHOWN ON PLANS. 7. OWNER, CONTRACTOR, AND TOWER NETWORK CARRIER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER SHALL MEET JOINTLY TO VERIFY ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 8. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO STARTING WORK ON ANY ITEM NOT CLEARLY DEFINED BY THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM WORK DURING OWNER'S PREFERRED HOURS TO AVOID DISTURBING NORMAL BUSINESS. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TOWER NETWORK CARRIER PROPER INSURANCE CERTIFICATES NAMING TOWER NETWORK CARRIER AS ADDITIONAL INSURED, AND TOWER NETWORK CARRIER PROOF OF LICENSE(S) AND PE & PD INSURANCE. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, AND PROCEDURES FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S/VENDOR'S SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE PRECEDENCE. 13. ALL WORK PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY, MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL CODES BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. 14. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE, AT THE PROJECT SITE, A FULL SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS UPDATED WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS AND ADDENDA OR CLARIFICATIONS FOR USE BY ALL PERSONNEL INVOLVED WITH THE PROJECT. THIS SET IS A VALID CONTRACT DOCUMENT ONLY IF THE TITLE SHEET IS STAMPED "FOR CONSTRUCTION" AND EACH SUCCESSIVE SHEET BEARS THE ARCHITECT'S SIGNED WET STAMP. 15. A COPY OF GOVERNING AGENCY APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE KEPT IN A PLACE SPECIFIED BY THE GOVERNING AGENCY, AND BY LAW, SHALL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT ALL TIMES. THE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE USED BY THE WORKMEN. ALL CONSTRUCTION SETS SHALL REFLECT THE SAME INFORMATION AS GOVERNING AGENCY APPROVED PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO MAINTAIN ONE SET OF PLANS, IN GOOD CONDITION, COMPLETE WITH ALL REVISIONS, ADDENDA, AND CHANGE ORDERS ON THE PREMISES AT ALL TIMES UNDER THE DIRECT CARE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY TOWER NETWORK CARRIER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER. WITH A COPY OF ALL REVISIONS, ADDENDA, AND/OR CHANGE ORDERS AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE WORK AS A PART OF THE AS -BUILT DRAWING RECORDS. 16. THE STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF ADJACENT CONSTRUCTION OR FACILITIES ARE NOT TO BE ALTERED BY THIS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STUDY THE STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, AND PLUMBING PLANS AND CROSS CHECK THEIR DETAILS, NOTES, DIMENSIONS, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY WORK. 18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COMPLETE SECURITY OF THE PROJECT AND SITE WHILE THE WORK IS IN PROGRESS UNTIL THE JOB IS COMPLETE. 19. THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF LOCATING ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS, AND TO PROTECT THEM FROM DAMAGE. THE CONTRACTOR, OR SUBCONTRACTOR AS SPECIFIED IN THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SUBCONTRACTOR AND CONTRACTOR, SHALL BEAR THE EXPENSES OF REPAIR AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF UTILITIES OR OTHER PROPERTY DAMAGE BY OPERATIONS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK. 20. THE REFERENCES ON THE DRAWINGS ARE FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY AND SHALL NOT LIMIT THE APPLICATION OF ANY DRAWING OR DETAIL. GENERAL NOTES CONT'D: 22. ALL EXISTING CONSTRUCTION, EQUIPMENT, AND FINISHES NOTED TO BE REMOVED SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: A. PROPERTY NOTED TO BE RETURNED TO THE OWNER. B. PROPERTY NOTED TO BE REMOVED BY THE OWNER. 23. THE GOVERNING AGENCIES, CODE AUTHORITIES, AND BUILDING INSPECTORS SHALL PROVIDE THE MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES, MATERIALS, AND FINISHES USED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. TRADE STANDARDS AND/OR PUBLISHED MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS MEETING OR EXCEEDING DESIGN REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE USED FOR INSTALLATION. 24. WHEN REQUIRED STORAGE OF MATERIALS OCCURS, THEY SHALL BE EVENLY DISTRIBUTED OVER ROUGH FRAMED FLOORS OR ROOFS SO AS NOT TO EXCEED THE DESIGNED LIVE LOADS FOR THE STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY SHORING AND/OR BRACING IS TO BE PROVIDED WHERE THE STRUCTURE HAS NOT ATTAINED THE DESIGN STRENGTH FOR THE CONDITIONS PRESENT. 25. PRIOR TO THE POURING OF ANY NEW SLAB OVER AN EXISTING SLAB THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL OPENINGS, CHASES, AND EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE TO BE IMPLEMENTED INTO THE NEW WORK. ALL ITEMS DESIGNATED TO BE ABANDONED SHALL BE NOTED AND DISCUSSED WITH THE OWNER AND TOWER NETWORK CARRIER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER AS PART OF THE AS -BUILT DRAWING PACKAGE. 26. SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE -RATED AREAS WITH U.L. LISTED OR FIRE MARSHALL APPROVED MATERIALS IF APPLICABLE TO THIS FACILITY AND OR PROJECT SITE. 27. BUILDING INSPECTORS AND/OR OTHER BUILDING OFFICIALS ARE TO BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING, CONSTRUCTION, AND ANY OTHER PROJECT EFFORT AS MANDATED BY THE GOVERNING AGENCY. 28. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2-A OR 2-A10BC WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF PROJECT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. 29. THE PROJECT, WHEN COMPLETED, SHALL COMPLY WITH LOCAL SECURITY CODES AND TITLE-24 ENERGY CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS. (TITLE-24 WHEN APPLICABLE) 30. ALL GLASS AND GLAZING IS TO COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 54 OF THE U.S. CONSUMER SAFETY COMMISSION - SAFETY STANDARDS FOR ARCHITECTURAL GLAZING MATERIALS (42 FIR 1428, CFR PART 1201) AND LOCAL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. 31. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, PAVING, CURBING, ETC. DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY. 32. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP GENERAL WORK AREA CLEAN AND HAZARD FREE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS, AND RUBBISH. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY OR PREMISES. SITE SHALL BE LEFT IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST, OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. 33. NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDED TO EXISTING CONSTRUCTION SHALL MATCH IN FORM, TEXTURE, FINISH, AND IN MATERIALS EXCEPT AS NOTED IN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 34. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY BACKING, BLOCKING, AND/OR SLEEVES REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF FIXTURES, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, PLUMBING, HARDWARE, AND FINISH ITEMS TO INSURE A PROPER AND COMPLETE JOB. 35. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A PROJECT LEVEL, STRAIGHT, AND TRUE ACCORDING TO THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPARE THE LINES AND LEVELS OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLANS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. TOWER NETWORK CARRIER SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INCONSISTENCIES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. 36. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR ADJOINING PROPERTIES FROM PHYSICAL HARM, NOISE, DUST, DIRT, AND FIRE AS REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING AGENCIES. 37. WHERE SPECIFIED, MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE TO THE LATEST STANDARDS AND/OR REVISIONS AVAILABLE AS REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING AGENCY RESPONSIBLE FOR RECORDING THE RESULTS. 38. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STORAGE OF ALL MATERIALS AND SHALL NOT DO SO ON PUBLIC PROPERTY WITHOUT A PERMIT TO DO SO FROM THE GOVERNING AGENCIES FOR THIS PURPOSE. 39. GENERAL NOTES AND STANDARD DETAILS ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO BE USED IN CONDITIONS WHICH ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY SHOWN OTHERWISE. 40. TRADES INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN CUTTING, FITTING, PATCHING, ETC., SO AS TO BE RECEIVED PROPERLY BY THE WORK OF OTHER TRADES. 41. ALL DEBRIS AND REFUSE IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE PROJECT PREMISES AND SHALL BE LEFT IN A CLEAN (BROOM FINISH) CONDITION AT ALL TIMES BY EACH TRADE AS THEY PERFORM THEIR OWN PORTION OF THE WORK.. 42. TOWER NETWORK CARRIER DOES NOT GUARANTEE ANY PRODUCTS, FIXTURES, AND/OR ANY EQUIPMENT NAMED BY A TRADE OR MANUFACTURER. GUARANTEE OR WARRANTY THAT MAY BE IN EFFECT IS DONE SO THROUGH THE COMPANY OR MANUFACTURER PROVIDING THE PRODUCT, FIXTURE, AND/OR EQUIPMENT ONLY: UNLESS SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITY IS ALSO PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR IN WRITTEN FORM. 43. CAUTION! CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! BURIED UTILITIES EXIST IN THE AREA AND UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN MAY NOT BE COMPLETE. CONTACT THE ONE -CALL UTILITY LOCATE SERVICE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 1-800-424-5555. 44. CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE AND/OR REROUTE ANY EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ENCOUNTERED DURING TRENCHING AND GENERAL CONSTRUCTION. 45. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF MONOPOLE FOOTING AND OTHER STRUCTURES TO BE PLACED IN GROUND. SEE GENERAL NOTE #6 ON THIS SHEET. 46. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL SITE INFORMATION. GENERAL NOTES CONT'D: 48. CONTRACTOR TO DOCUMENT ALL CHANGES MADE IN THE FIELD BY MARKING UP (REDLINING) THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION SET AND SUBMITTING THE REDLINED SET TO TOWER NETWORK CARRIER UPON COMPLETION. 49. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE ALL POWER INSTALLATION WITH POWER COMPANY AS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR TO REPORT POWER INSTALLATION COORDINATION SOLUTION(S) TO NETWORK CARRIER REPRESENTATIVE, PROJECT CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND ARCHITECT. 50. ANY SUBSTITUTIONS OF MATERIALS AND/OR EQUIPMENT, MUST BE APPROVED BY TOWER NETWORK CARRIER CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. 51. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL REMEDY ALL FAULTY, INFERIOR, AND/OR IMPROPER MATERIALS, DAMAGED GOODS, AND/OR FAULTY WORKMANSHIP FOR ONE (1) YEAR AFTER THE PROJECT IS COMPETE AND ACCEPTED UNDER THIS CONTRACT; UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE IN THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE OWNER AND THE CONTRACTOR. (EXCEPTION) THE ROOFING SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ALL WORK DONE, COSIGNED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, TO MAINTAIN THE ROOFING IN A WATERTIGHT CONDITION FOR A PERIOD OF TWO (2) YEARS STARTING AFTER THE DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, UNLESS OTHERWISE WRITTEN IN THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE OWNER AND THE CONTRACTOR. 52. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR THE SAFETY OF THE OWNER'S EMPLOYEES, WORKMEN, AND ALL TIMES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. 53. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PAY FOR ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND/OR FEES WITH RESPECT TO THE WORK TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS SHALL BE FILED BY THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN PERMIT AND MAKE FINAL PAYMENT FOR SAID DOCUMENT. 54. THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER IN CHARGE SHALL SIGN AND SEAL ALL DRAWINGS AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS. 55. TOWER NETWORK CARRIER WILL REVIEW AND APPROVE SHOP DRAWINGS AND SAMPLES FOR CONFORMANCE WITH DESIGN CONCEPT. TOWER NETWORK CARRIER PROJECT APPROVAL OF A SEPARATE ITEM SHALL NOT INCLUDE APPROVAL OF AN ASSEMBLY IN WHICH THE ITEM FUNCTIONS. 56. ALL ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON ROOF SUPPORT FRAMES TO BE PROVIDED BY TOWER NETWORK CARRIER COMMUNICATIONS. 57. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TRENCH AS REQUIRED TO INSTALL BOTH ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND CONDUITS (#40 PVC) PER S.C.E. WORKORDER. BACKFILL WITH CLEAN SAND AND COMPACT TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DISTRICTS INSPECTOR. REPLACE FINISH GRADE WITH MATCHING MATERIALS (GRASS, ASPHALT, CONCRETE, ETC.) 58. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE HEAVY STEEL PLATES AT OPEN TRENCHES FOR SAFETY AND TO PROTECT EXISTING GROUND SURFACES FROM HEAVY EQUIPMENT UTILIZED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 59. CONTRACTOR TO PATCH AND REPAIR ALL GROUND SURFACES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A UNIFORM SURFACE AND MAINTAIN EXISTING SURFACE DRAINAGE SLOPES. 60. CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE LANDSCAPE VEGETATION THAT WAS DAMAGED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION, AND TO MODIFY REMAINING IRRIGATION LINES TO OPERATING CONDITION, PROVIDING FULL COVERAGE TO IMPACTED AREAS. 61. IN THE CASE OF ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS FOR EQUIPMENT AND/OR ANTENNA FRAMES WHERE PENETRATION OF EXISTING ROOFING MATERIALS OCCUR, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH BUILDING OWNER AND BUILDING ROOFING CONTRACTOR OF RECORD FOR INSTALLATION, PATCH, REPAIR OR ANY AUGMENTATION TO THE ROOF, AND HAVE THE WORK GUARANTEED UNDER THE ROOFING CONTRACTOR'S WARRANTY FOR MOISTURE PENETRATION OR AND OTHER FUTURE BREACH OF ROOFING INTEGRITY. 62. IN THE CASE OF ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS WITH THE INSTALLATION OF ANTENNAS WITHIN CONCEALED (SHROUDED) SUPPORT FRAMES OR TRIPODS, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE FRP DESIGNER/FABRICATOR TO ENSURE THAT THE FINAL FRP SHROUD IS SIMULATING (IN APPEARANCE) DESIGNATED EXISTING EXTERIOR BUILDING FACADE MATERIALS, TEXTURES, AND COLORS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURTHERMORE ENSURE THE USE OF COUNTERSUNK FASTENERS IN ALL FRP CONSTRUCTION. WHEN PHOTOSIMULATIONS ARE PROVIDED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT FINAL CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTS WHAT IS INDICATED IN PHOTOSIMULATION. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, CONSTRUCTION COORDINATOR, AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION AND CONSTRUCTION. 63. IN THE CASE OF ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS FOR EQUIPMENT AND/OR ANTENNA FRAMES WHERE ANCHORING TO A CONCRETE ROOF SLAB IS REQUIRED, CONTRACTORS SHALL CONFIRM (PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID) WITH CONSULTING CONSTRUCTION COORDINATOR AND ARCHITECT THE PRESENCE OF POST TENSION TENDONS WITHIN THE ROOF SLAB - RESULTING FROM AN UNDOCUMENTED DESIGN CHANGE IN THE EXISTING BUILDING "AS -BUILT DRAWING SET" - HAVING INDICATED AN ORIGINAL DESIGN SOLUTION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE W/ EMBEDDED STEEL REBAR. IN THE EVENT POST TENSION SLAB SOLUTION IS PRESENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE PROVISIONS FOR X-RAY PROCEDURES (INCLUDED IN BID) FOR ALL PENETRATION AREAS WHERE ANCHORING OCCURS. 64. GENERAL & SUB CONTRACTORS SHALL USE STAINLESS STEEL METAL LOCKING TIES FOR ALL CABLE TRAY TIE DOWNS AND ALL OTHER GENERAL TIE DOWNS (WHERE APPLICABLE). PLASTIC ZIP TIES SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED FOR USE ON TOWER NETWORK CARRIER PROJECTS. RECOMMENDED MANUFACTURE SHALL BE: PANDUIT CORP. METAL LOCKING TIES MODEL NO. MLT4S-CP UNDER SERIES-304 (OR EQUAL). PANDUIT PRODUCT DISTRIBUTED BY TRIARC. 65. ALL WORK TO BE DONE BETWEEN HOURS OF 8:00 AM AND 5:00 PM, EXCLUDING HOLIDAYS. 0 cc� w a LDCCommercial Infrastructure Residential THE CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP Telecom 14201 NE 200th St., #100 Ph. 425.806.1869 Woodinville, WA 98072 Fx. 425.482.2893 www.LDCcorp.com DATE: 10-28-11 DRAWN BY: VJT CHECKED BY: RJA REVISIONS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 1 10-28-11 1 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION RJA 2 02-07-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION RJA 3 6-05-12 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION MEV 4 8-14-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 5 9-20-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 6 9-28-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV V, VIL �� of wasglhp 40908 �N - STY Q� �SSI0NAL E�Csti ��1r SITE WA696 NE TACOMA 33914 19TH AVENUE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 :SHEET TITLE ENERALNOTES SHEET NUMBER cy .3 a �1 21. ALL DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS ARE TO FACE OF STUD (F.O.S.) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (U.N.O.). 47. CONTRACTOR TO DOCUMENT ALL WORK PERFORMED WITH PHOTOGRAPHS AND SUBMIT TO TOWER NETWORK CARRIER ALONG WITH REDLINED CONSTRUCTION SET. E a N I N 0 N 0 Q U 0 -6 0 0 3 0 1 CV U i 0 U M N I c 0 U L c 0 U c 0 / a E 0 U D w z co Q I Q DESIGN CRITERIA: 18 STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES; 1. THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 1. SHOP DRAWINGS FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2009 WITH WASHINGTON STATE BUILDING CODE CONSULTANT FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO FABRICATION. AMENDMENTS (2009 IBC) 2. STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN, FABRICATION AND ERECTION (INCLUDING FIELD 2. DESIGN LOADS: WELDING, HIGH STRENGTH FIELD BOLTING, EXPANSION BOLTS, AND THREADED EXPANSION ANCHORS) SHALL BE BASED ON THE A.I.S.C. "SPECIFICATION FOR THE DESIGN DATA FOR FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON DESIGN, FABRICATION, AND ERECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR BUILDINGS" LATEST EDITION. SUPERVISION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2O09 IBC CHAPTER -ROOF SNOW LOAD N/A (NOT A ROOFTOP SOLUTION) 22, BY A QUALIFIED TESTING AGENCY DESIGNATED BY THE CONSULTANT. THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH A COPY OF ALL INSPECTION REPORTS -BASIC WIND SPEED 85 MPH AND TEST RESULTS. -WIND EXPOSURE C 3. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: -SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY D TYPE OF MEMBER CONCRETE NOTES: A. WIDE FLANGE SHAPES ASTM 992, GRADE 50 B. PLATES, SHAPES, ANGLES, AND RODS ASTM A36, Fy 36 KSI 1. ALL CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI-318. C. SPECIAL SHAPES AND PLATES ASTM A572, Fy 50 KSI D. PIPE COLUMNS ASTM A53, Fy 35 KSI 2. CONCRETE SHALL BE MIXED, PROPORTIONED CONVEYED AND PLACED IN E. STRUCTURAL TUBING ASTM A500, Fy 46 KSI ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 19 OF THE 2009 IBC. STRENGTHS AT 28 DAYS AND MIX F. ANCHOR BOLTS ASTM A307 CRITERIA SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS. G. CONNECTION BOLTS ASTM A325 TWIST -OFF -TYPE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 28 DAY STRENGTHS W/C MINIMUM CEMENT CONTENT 4. ALL STEEL EXPOSED TO WEATHER TO BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED AFTER ft) RATIO PER CUBIC YARD FABRICATION PER Al23/A123M-00. A. SLABS ON GRADE TOPPING SLABS 5. ALL WELDING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH A.I.S.C. AND AWS STANDARDS AND CONCRETE PIERS 2,500 PSI < .45 5 1/2 SACKS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY W.A.B.O. CERTIFIED WELDERS USING E70 XX ELECTRODES. ONLY PREQUALIFIED WELDS (AS DEFINED BY AWS) SHALL BE USED. B. ALL STRUCTURAL CONCRETE 4,000 PSI < .45 6 1/2 SACKS WELDING OF GRADE 60 REINFORCING BARS (IF REQUIRED) SHALL BE PERFORMED EXCEPT WALLS USING LOW HYDROGEN ELECTRODES. WELDING OF GRADE 40 REINFORCING BARS (IF REQUIRED) SHALL BE PERFORMED USING E70 XX ELECTRODES. WELDING WITHIN C. CONCRETE WALLS 4,000 PSI < .45 6 1/2 SACKS 4" OF COLD BENDS IN REINFORCING STEEL IS NOT PERMITTED. SEE REINFORCING NOTE FOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS OF WELDED BARS. CEMENT SHALL BE ASTM C150, PORTLAND CEMENT TYPE II U.N.O. 6. COLD -FORMED STEEL FRAMING MEMBERS SHALL BE OF THE SHAPE, SIZE, AND 3. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE GAGE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PROVIDE MINIMUM SECTION PROPERTIES INDICATED. METHODS AND PROCEDURES OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT, ALL COLD -FORMED STEEL FRAMING SHALL CONFORM TO THE A.I.S.I. "SPECIFICATION FOR THE DESIGN OF COLD -FORMED STEEL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS." 4. ALL CONCRETE WITH SURFACES EXPOSED TO STANDING WATER SHALL BE 7. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL USE BEARING TYPE ASTM A325 BOLTS (3/4" DIA.) AND AIR -ENTRAINED WITH AN AIR -ENTRAINING AGENT CONFORMING TO ASTM C260, C494, SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. C618, C989, AND C1017. TOTAL AIR CONTENT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318, SECTION 4.4.1. 8. NON-STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS FOR STEEL GRATING MAY USE 5/8" DIA. ASTM 5. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A615 (INCLUDING SUPPLEMENT S1), A307 BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. GRADE 60, fy=60,000 PSI. EXCEPTIONS: ANY BARS APECIFICALLY SO NOTED ON THE 9. PAINT ALL STEEL WORK (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE). PREPARATION AND PAINTING DRAWINGS SHALL BE GRADE 40, fy=40,000 PSI. GRADE 60 REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PAINT MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN INDICATED ON DRAWINGS TO BE WELDED SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A706. REINFORCING COMPLYING WITH ASTM A615 (S1) MAY BE WELDED ONLY IF MATERIAL INSTRUCTIONS. PROPERTY REPORTS INDICATING CONFORMANCE WITH WELDING PROCEDURES 10. ALL WELDS TO BE 1/4" FILLET UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPECIFIED IN A.W.S. D14 ARE SUBMITTED. 6. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE DETAILED (INCLUDING HOOKS AND BENDS) IN 11. TOUCH UP ALL FIELD DRILLING AND WELDING WITH 2 COATS OF GALVACON (ZINC LAP ALL CONTINUOUS REINFORCEMENT AT RICH PAINT) OR APPROVED EQUAL. ACCORDANCE WITH MU 315 AND 3 . LEAST 30 BAR DIAMETERS OF A MINIMUM OF 2'-0". PROVIDE CORNER BARS AT ALL WALL AND FOOTING INTERSECTIONS. LAP CORNER BARS AT LEAST 30 BAR DIAMETERS OR A MINIMUM OF 2'-0". LAP ADJACENT MATS OF WELDED WIRE FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 8" AT SIDES AND ENDS. 7. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A-185. 8. SPIRAL REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE PLAIN WIRE CONFORMING TO ASTM A615, GRADE 60, fy=60,000 PSI. 9. NO BARS PARTIALLY EMBEDDED IN HARDENED CONCRETE SHALL BE FIELD BENT UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SO DETAILED OR APPROVED BY THE CONSULTANT. 10. CONCRETE PROTECTION (COVER) FOR REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: - FOOTINGS AND OTHER UNFORMED SURFACES, EARTH FACE 3" - FORMED SURFACES EXPOSED (#6 BARS OR LARGER) 2" TO EARTH OR WEATHER (#5 BARS OF SMALLER) 1 1/2" - SLABS AND WALLS (INTERIOR FACE) 3/4" 11. BARS SHALL BE SUPPORTED ON CHAIRS OR DOBIE BRICKS. 12. ANCHOR BOLTS TO CONFORM TO ASTM A307 13. NON -SHRINK GROUT SHALL BE FURNISHED BY AN APPROVED MANUFACTURER AND SHALL BE MIXED AND PLACED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S PUBLISHED RECOMMENDATIONS. GROUT STRENGTH SHALL BE AT LEAST EQUAL TO THE MATERIAL ON WHICH IT IS PLACED (3,000 PSI MINIMUM). 14. ALL EXPANSION ANCHORS TO BE HILTI BRAND. ADHESIVE ANCHORS REQUIRE TESTING TO CONFIRM CAPACITY UNLESS WAIVED BY ENGINEER. TOWER/POLE NOTES: 1. VERIFICATION THAT THE EXISTING TOWER/POLE CAN SUPPORT THE PROPOSED ANTENNA LOADING IS TO BE DONE BY OTHERS. 2. PROVIDE SUPPORTS FOR THE ANTENNA COAX CABLES TO THE ELEVATION OF ALL INITIAL AND FUTURE ANTENNAS. ANTENNA COAX CABLES ARE TO BE SUPPORTED AND RESTRAINED AT THE CENTERS SUITABLE TO THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS. ABBREVIATED ROOF TOP SAFETY PROCEDURES SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS: (WHEN APPLICABLE): (AS PER "ACCIDENT PREVENTION PROGRAM" - BY PERMISSION OF WREN CONSTRUCTION, INC. - 03/01/99) FALL PROTECTION METHODS AND EQUIPMENT ROOF TOP INSTALLATIONS 1. FOR WORK IS BEING PERFORMED WITHIN 25' OF AN UNPROTECTED ROOF EDGE, THE CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR SHALL DESIGNATE A TRAINED SAFETY MONITOR TO OBSERVE THE MOVEMENTS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE CONSTRUCTION WORKERS. 2. SAFETY MONITOR SHALL WARN CONSTRUCTION WORKERS OF HAZARDS (I.E., BACKING UP TOWARD A ROOF EDGE, ETC.) OR UNSAFE ACTIVITIES. THE SAFETY MONITOR MUST BE ON THE SAME ROOF AND WITHIN VISUAL AND VERBAL DISTANCE OF THE CONSTRUCTION WORKERS. 3. CONSTRUCTION INVOLVING WORKERS TO APPROACH WITHIN 6' OR LESS OF AN UNPROTECTED ROOF EDGE, REQUIRES WORKERS TO USE SAFETY LINE. 4. SAFETY LINE SHALL BE MINIMUM 1/2" DIAMETER NYLON, WITH A NOMINAL TENSILE STRENGTH OF 5400 LBS. 5. SAFETY LINE SHALL BE ATTACHED TO A SUBSTANTIAL MEMBER OF THE STRUCTURE. 6. SAFETY LINE LENGTH SHALL BE SET ALLOWING CONSTRUCTION WORKER TO REACH EDGE OF ROOF, BUT NOT BEYOND. 7. SAFETY BELTS SHALL BE WORN BY ALL CONSTRUCTION WORKERS. 8. MONTHLY SAFETY INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE FALL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT SHALL OCCUR BY THE SAFETY COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES, INCLUDING: INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION AREA FOR HAZARDS USE OF AN INSPECTION CHECKLIST INTERVIEWING COWORKERS REGARDING SAFETY CONCERNS REPORTING AND DOCUMENTING ANY HAZARDS REPORTING HAZARDS TO THE SAFETY COMMITTEE FOR CONSIDERATION POSTING RESULTS OF INSPECTION AND ANY ACTION TAKEN RECEIVING AN UNBIASED REVIEW OF ONE'S OWN WORK AREA BY ANOTHER COWORKER SAFETY REPRESENTATIVE REFER TO ROOFTOP WORK AREA SAFETY PROTOCOL NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TOWER ERECTORS 2000 PUBLICATION REFERENCED OSHA REGULATION/STANDARDS SHALL BE REVIEWED BY TOWER ERECTORS, EQUIPMENT INSTALLERS, AND TOWER/ROOF TOP CONTRACTORS/SUBCONTRACTORS 29 CFR 1926.500 - SCOPE, APPLICATION, AND DEFINITIONS 29 CFR 1926.501 - DUTY TO HAVE FALL PROTECTION 19 CFR 1926.502 - FALL PROTECTION SYSTEMS CRITERIA AND PRACTICES SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED: A/C AIR CONDITIONING HORZ HORIZONTAL AGL ABOVE FINISH GRADE HR HOUR APPROX APPROXIMATELY HT HEIGHT HVAC HEATING BLDG BUILDING VENTILATION BLK BLOCKING AIR CONDITIONING CLG CEILING ID INSIDE DIAMETER CLR CLEAR IN INCH CONC CONCRETE INFO INFORMATION CONST CONSTRUCTION INSUL INSULATION CONT CONTINUOUS INT INTERIOR IBC INTERNATIONAL DBL DOUBLE BUILDING CODE DIA DIAMETER DIAG DIAGONAL LBS POUNDS DN DOWN MAX MAXIMUM DET DETAIL MECH MECHANICAL DWG DRAWING MTL METAL MFR MANUFACTURE EA EACH MGR MANAGER ELEV ELEVATION MIN MINIMUM ELEC ELECTRICAL MISC MISCELLANEOUS EQ EQUAL EQUIP EQUIPMENT NA NOT APPLICABLE EXT EXTERIOR NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NTS NOT TO SCALE FIN FINISH FLUOR FLUORESCENT OC ON CENTER FLR FLOOR OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER FT FOOT PLYWD PLYWOOD GA GAUGE PROJ PROJECT GALV GALVANIZED PROP PROPERTY GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR PT PRESSURE TREATED GRND GROUND REQ REQUIRED GYP BD GYPSUM WALL BOARD RM ROOM RO ROUGH OPENING UGT UNDERGROUND TELECO . OHT OVERHEAD TELECO . UGP UNDERGROUND POWER -OHP OVERHEAD POWER -P PROPANE -UG UNDERGROUND UTILITY COAX COAXIAL CABLE ANTENNA CENTERLINE (E) EXISTING (P) NEW e DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER SHT SHEET SIM SIMILAR SPEC SPECIFICATION SF SQUARE FOOT SS STAINLESS STEEL STL STEEL STRUCT STRUCTURAL STD STUD SUSP SUSPENDED THRU THROUGH TNNG TINNED TYP TYPICAL UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VERT VERTICAL VIF VERIFY IN FIELD W/ WITH W/O WITHOUT WP WATER PROOF SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION ❑ VERIFICATIONS OF MILL REPORT ❑ SPRAYED -ON- FIREPROOFING CONCRETE OVER 2400 PSI (5 1/2 SACK MIX) AT 28 DAYS ❑ IDENTIFICATION OF STEEL AND AT JOB SITE ❑ STRUCTURAL MASONRY CONCRETE PLACEMENT AT SLAB ON GRADE WRITTEN CERTIFICATION FOR PROPER PLACEMENT OF ❑ ADHESIVE BOLTS IN CONCRETE OR MASONRY ❑ PRESTRESSED CONCRETE REINFORCEMENTS AT SLAB ON GRADE ❑ ALL FIELD WELDING FOUNDATION EXCAVATION AND FILL INCLUDING UTILITY TRENCHES ❑ ANCHOR BOLTS INSTALLATION AND PLACEMENT IN CONCRETE ❑ REINFORCING PLACEMENT CERTIFICATION OF BUILDING PAD, FOUNDATION AND FILL BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF THE RECORD ❑ HIGH STRENGTH BOLTING ❑ DESIGNER SPECIFIED (SEE SHEET#_) ❑ OTHER SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD, WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED AND SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THEIR DESIGN AND SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. L a Commercial Infrastructure LU kw Residential THE CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP Telecom 14201 NE 200th St., #100 Ph. 425.806.1869 Woodinville, WA 98072 Fx. 425.482.2893 www.LDCcorp.com DATE: 10-28-11 DRAWN BY: VJT CHECKED BY: RJA REVISIONS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 1 10-28-11 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION RJA 2 02-07-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION RJA 3 6-05-12 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION MEV 4 8-14-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 5 9-20-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 6 9-28-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV E• VjL �� pF WAS�'p 40908 STERF� �v SITE WA696 NE TACOMA 33914 19TH AVENUE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 SHEET TITLE F ERAL NOTES AND SYMBOLS 7 SHEET NUMBER G=2 m � W 3 (00 REVISIO S'No REV DATE DESCRIPTION 1 10-28-11 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION 2 02-07-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION 3 6-05-12 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION 4 8-14-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION 5 9-20-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION 6 9-28-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION E 0 N I N 0 N 0 0 U 0 -o 0 n DESIGN CRITERIA: STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES; ABBREVIATED ROOF TOP SAFETY PROCEDURES SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS: 1. THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 1. SHOP DRAWINGS FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE (WHEN APPLICABLE): A/C AIR CONDITIONING HORZ HORIZONTAL SHT SHEET INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2009 WITH WASHINGTON STATE BUILDING CODE CONSULTANT FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO FABRICATION. AGL ABOVE FINISH GRADE HR HOUR SIM SIMILAR AMENDMENTS (2009 IBC) (AS PER "ACCIDENT PREVENTION PROGRAM" - BY PERMISSION OF WREN APPROX APPROXIMATELY HT HEIGHT SPEC SPECIFICATION 2. STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN, FABRICATION AND ERECTION (INCLUDING FIELD CONSTRUCTION, INC. - 03/01/99) HVAC HEATING SF SQUARE FOOT 2. DESIGN LOADS: WELDING, HIGH STRENGTH FIELD BOLTING, EXPANSION BOLTS, AND THREADED BLDG BUILDING VENTILATION SS STAINLESS STEEL EXPANSION ANCHORS) SHALL BE BASED ON THE A.I.S.C. "SPECIFICATION FOR THE FALL PROTECTION METHODS AND EQUIPMENT BLK BLOCKING AIR CONDITIONING STL STEEL DESIGN DATA FOR FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON DESIGN, FABRICATION, AND ERECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR BUILDINGS" ROOF TOP INSTALLATIONS STRUCT STRUCTURAL LATEST EDITION. SUPERVISION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2O09 IBC CHAPTER CLG CEILING ID INSIDE DIAMETER STD STUD -ROOF SNOW LOAD N/A (NOT A ROOFTOP SOLUTION) 22, BY A QUALIFIED TESTING AGENCY DESIGNATED BY THE CONSULTANT. THE 1. FOR WORK IS BEING PERFORMED WITHIN 25OF AN UNPROTECTED ROOF EDGE, CLR CLEAR IN INCH SUSP SUSPENDED CONSULTANT SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH A COPY OF ALL INSPECTION REPORTS THE CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR SHALL DESIGNATE A TRAINED SAFETY CONC CONCRETE INFO INFORMATION -BASIC WIND SPEED 85 MPH AND TEST RESULTS. MONITOR TO OBSERVE THE MOVEMENTS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONST CONSTRUCTION INSUL INSULATION THRU THROUGH WORKERS. CONT CONTINUOUS INT INTERIOR TNNG TINNED -WIND EXPOSURE C 3. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: IBC INTERNATIONAL TYP TYPICAL 2. SAFETY MONITOR SHALL WARN CONSTRUCTION WORKERS OF HAZARDS (I.E., DBL DOUBLE BUILDING CODE -SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY D TYPE OF MEMBER BACKING UP TOWARD A ROOF EDGE, ETC.) OR UNSAFE ACTIVITIES. THE SAFETY DIA DIAMETER LINO UNLESS NOTED MONITOR MUST BE ON THE SAME ROOF AND WITHIN VISUAL AND VERBAL DIAG DIAGONAL LBS POUNDS OTHERWISE CONCRETE NOTES: A. WIDE FLANGE SHAPES ASTM 992, GRADE 50 DISTANCE OF THE CONSTRUCTION WORKERS. DN DOWN MAX MAXIMUM B. PLATES, SHAPES, ANGLES, AND RODS ASTM A36, Fy 36 KSI DET DETAIL MECH MECHANICAL VERT VERTICAL 1. ALL CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI-318. C. SPECIAL SHAPES AND PLATES ASTM A572, Fy 50 KSI 3. CONSTRUCTION INVOLVING WORKERS TO APPROACH WITHIN 6' OR LESS OF AN DWG DRAWING MTL METAL VIF VERIFY IN FIELD D. PIPE COLUMNS ASTM A53, Fy 35 KSI UNPROTECTED ROOF EDGE, REQUIRES WORKERS TO USE SAFETY LINE. MFR MANUFACTURE 2. CONCRETE SHALL BE MIXED, PROPORTIONED CONVEYED AND PLACED IN E. STRUCTURAL TUBING ASTM A500, Fy 46 KSI EA EACH MGR MANAGER W/ WITH ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 19 OF THE 2009 IBC. STRENGTHS AT 28 DAYS AND MIX F. ANCHOR BOLTS ASTM A307 4. SAFETY LINE SHALL BE MINIMUM 1/2" DIAMETER NYLON, WITH A NOMINAL TENSILE ELEV ELEVATION MIN MINIMUM W/O WITHOUT CRITERIA SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS. G. CONNECTION BOLTS ASTM A325 TWIST -OFF -TYPE STRENGTH OF 5400 LBS. ELEC ELECTRICAL MISC MISCELLANEOUS WP WATER PROOF EQ EQUAL TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 28 DAY STRENGTHS WIC MINIMUM CEMENT CONTENT 4. ALL STEEL EXPOSED TO WEATHER TO BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED AFTER 5. SAFETY LINE SHALL BE ATTACHED TO A SUBSTANTIAL MEMBER OF THE EQUIP EQUIPMENT NA NOT APPLICABLE ft) RATIO PER CUBIC YARD FABRICATION PER Al23/A123M-00. STRUCTURE. EXT EXTERIOR NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NTS NOT TO SCALE A. SLABS ON GRADE 5. ALL WELDING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH A.I.S.C. AND AWS STANDARDS AND 6. SAFETY LINE LENGTH SHALL BE SET ALLOWING CONSTRUCTION WORKER TO FIN FINISH TOPPING SLABS 2,500 PSI < 5 1/2 SACKS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY W.A.B.O. CERTIFIED WELDERS USING E70 XX REACH EDGE OF ROOF, BUT NOT BEYOND. FLUOR FLUORESCENT OC ON CENTER CONCRETE PIERS .45 ELECTRODES. ONLY PREQUALIFIED WELDS (AS DEFINED BY AWS) SHALL BE USED. FLR FLOOR OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER 4,000 PSI < 6 1/2 SACKS WELDING OF GRADE 60 REINFORCING BARS (IF REQUIRED) SHALL BE PERFORMED 7. SAFETY BELTS SHALL BE WORN BY ALL CONSTRUCTION WORKERS. FT FOOT B. ALL STRUCTURAL CONCRETE .45 USING LOW HYDROGEN ELECTRODES. WELDING OF GRADE 40 REINFORCING BARS PLYWD PLYWOOD EXCEPT WALLS (IF REQUIRED) SHALL BE PERFORMED USING E70 XX ELECTRODES. WELDING WITHIN 8. MONTHLY SAFETY INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE FALL PROTECTION GA GAUGE PROJ PROJECT 4,000 PSI < 6 1/2 SACKS 4" OF COLD BENDS IN REINFORCING STEEL IS NOT PERMITTED. SEE REINFORCING EQUIPMENT SHALL OCCUR BY THE SAFETY COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES, GALV GALVANIZED PROP PROPERTY C. CONCRETE WALLS - .45 NOTE FOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS OF WELDED BARS. INCLUDING: GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR PT PRESSURE TREATED GRND GROUND REQ REQUIRED CEMENT SHALL BE ASTM C150, PORTLAND CEMENT TYPE II U.N.O. 6. COLD -FORMED STEEL FRAMING MEMBERS SHALL BE OF THE SHAPE, SIZE, AND INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION AREA FOR HAZARDS GYP BD GYPSUM WALL BOARD RM ROOM GAGE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PROVIDE MINIMUM SECTION PROPERTIES INDICATED. USE OF AN INSPECTION CHECKLIST RO ROUGH OPENING 3. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ALL COLD -FORMED STEEL FRAMING SHALL CONFORM TO THE A.I.S.I. "SPECIFICATION INTERVIEWING COWORKERS REGARDING SAFETY CONCERNS METHODS AND PROCEDURES OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT. FOR THE DESIGN OF COLD -FORMED STEEL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS." REPORTING AND DOCUMENTING ANY HAZARDS UGT UNDERGROUND TELECO 4. ALL CONCRETE WITH SURFACES EXPOSED TO STANDING WATER SHALL BE REPORTING HAZARDS TO THE SAFETY COMMITTEE FOR CONSIDERATION OHT OVERHEAD TELECO 7. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL USE BEARING TYPE ASTM A325 BOLTS (3/4" DIA.) AND POSTING RESULTS OF INSPECTION AND ANY ACTION TAKEN AIR -ENTRAINED WITH AN AIR -ENTRAINING AGENT CONFORMING TO ASTM C SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. RECEIVING AN UNBIASED REVIEW OF ONE'S OWN WORK AREA BY ANOTHER UGP UNDERGROUND POWER C618, C989, AND C1017. TOTAL AIR CONTENT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI WITH COWORKER SAFETY REPRESENTATIVE OHP OVERHEAD POWER 318, SECTION 4.4.1. 8. NON-STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS FOR STEEL GRATING MAY USE 5/8" DIA. ASTM A307 BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFER TO ROOFTOP WORK AREA SAFETY PROTOCOL P PROPANE 5. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A615 (INCLUDING SUPPLEMENT S1), NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TOWER ERECTORS 2000 PUBLICATION UG UNDERGROUND UTILITY GRADE 60, fy=60,000 PSI. EXCEPTIONS: ANY BARS APECIFICALLY SO NOTED ON THE 9• PAINT ALL STEEL WORK (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE). PREPARATION AND PAINTING BA IB N DRAWINGS SHALL BE GRADE 40, fy=40,000 PSI. GRADE 60 REINFORCING BARS 0, SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PAINT MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN REFERENCED OSHA REGULATION/STANDARDS SHALL BE REVIEWED BY TOWER COAX COAXIAL CABLE INDICATED ON DRAWINGS TO WELDED SHALL CONFORM ASTM INSTRUCTIONS. ERECTORS, � ANTENNA REINFORCING COMPLYING WITH ASTM A615 (S1) MAY BE WELDED ONLY IF MATERIAL EQUIPMENT INSTALLERS, AND TOWER/ROOF TOP CONTRACTORS/SUBCONTRACTORS PROPERTY REPORTS INDICATING CONFORMANCE WITH WELDING PROCEDURES IN 10. ALL WELDS TO BE 1/4" FILLET UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 29 CFR 1926.500 - SCOPE, APPLICATION, AND DEFINITIONS � CENTERLINE SPECIFIED IN A.W.S. ARE SUBMITTED. 29 CFR 1926.501 - DUTY TO HAVE FALL PROTECTION (E) EXISTING 6. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE DETAILED (INCLUDING HOOKS AND BENDS) IN 11. TOUCH UP ALL FIELD DRILLING AND WELDING WITH 2 COATS OF GALVACON (ZINC 19 CFR 1926.502 - FALL PROTECTION SYSTEMS CRITERIA AND PRACTICES (P) NEW ACCORDANCE WITH AC1 315 AND 318. LAP ALL CONTINUOUS REINFORCEMENT AT RICH PAINT) OR APPROVED EQUAL. LEAST 30 BAR DIAMETERS OF A MINIMUM OF 2'-0". PROVIDE CORNER BARS AT ALL e DETAIL NUMBER WALL AND FOOTING INTERSECTIONS. LAP CORNER BARS AT LEAST 30 BAR TOWER/POLE NOTES: SHEET NUMBER DIAMETERS OR A MINIMUM OF 2'-0". LAP ADJACENT MATS OF WELDED WIRE FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 8" AT SIDES AND ENDS. 1. VERIFICATION THAT THE EXISTING TOWER/POLE CAN SUPPORT THE PROPOSED ANTENNA LOADING IS TO BE DONE BY OTHERS. 7. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A-185. 2. PROVIDE SUPPORTS FOR THE ANTENNA COAX CABLES TO THE ELEVATION OF ALL 8. SPIRAL REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE PLAIN WIRE CONFORMING TO ASTM A615, INITIAL AND FUTURE ANTENNAS. ANTENNA COAX CABLES ARE TO BE SUPPORTED GRADE 60, fy=60,000 PSI. AND RESTRAINED AT THE CENTERS SUITABLE TO THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS. 9. NO BARS PARTIALLY EMBEDDED IN HARDENED CONCRETE SHALL BE FIELD BENT UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SO DETAILED OR APPROVED BY THE CONSULTANT. 10. CONCRETE PROTECTION (COVER) FOR REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: - FOOTINGS AND OTHER UNFORMED SURFACES, EARTH FACE 3" - FORMED SURFACES EXPOSED (#6 BARS OR LARGER) 2" TO EARTH OR WEATHER (#5 BARS OF SMALLER) 1 1/2" - SLABS AND WALLS (INTERIOR FACE) 3/4" 11. BARS SHALL BE SUPPORTED ON CHAIRS OR DOBIE BRICKS. 12. ANCHOR BOLTS TO CONFORM TO ASTM A307 13. NON -SHRINK GROUT SHALL BE FURNISHED BY AN APPROVED MANUFACTURER AND SHALL BE MIXED AND PLACED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S PUBLISHED RECOMMENDATIONS. GROUT STRENGTH SHALL BE AT LEAST EQUAL TO THE MATERIAL ON WHICH IT IS PLACED (3,000 PSI MINIMUM). 14. ALL EXPANSION ANCHORS TO BE HILTI BRAND. ADHESIVE ANCHORS REQUIRE TESTING TO CONFIRM CAPACITY UNLESS WAIVED BY ENGINEER. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED: SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION ❑ VERIFICATIONS OF MILL REPORT ❑ SPRAYED -ON- FIREPROOFING CONCRETE OVER 2400 PSI (5 1/2 SACK MIX) AT 28 DAYS ❑ IDENTIFICATION OF STEEL AND AT JOB SITE ❑ STRUCTURAL MASONRY CONCRETE PLACEMENT AT SLAB ON GRADE WRITTEN CERTIFICATION FOR PROPER PLACEMENT OF ❑ ADHESIVE BOLTS IN CONCRETE OR MASONRY ❑ PRESTRESSED CONCRETE REINFORCEMENTS AT SLAB ON GRADE ❑ ALL FIELD WELDING FOUNDATION EXCAVATION AND FILL INCLUDING UTILITY TRENCHES ❑ ANCHOR BOLTS INSTALLATION AND PLACEMENT IN CONCRETE ❑ REINFORCING PLACEMENT CERTIFICATION OF BUILDING PAD, FOUNDATION AND FILL BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF THE RECORD ❑ HIGH STRENGTH BOLTING ❑ DESIGNER SPECIFIED (SEE SHEET#_) ❑ OTHER SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD, WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED AND SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THEIR DESIGN AND SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. Zz L I. Q • / / 1 • • y f �h Commercial Infrastructure LLJLw Residential THE CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP Telecom 14201 NE 200th St., #100 Ph. 425.806.1869 Woodinville, WA 98072 Fx. 425.482.2893 www.LDCcorp.com DATE: 10-28-11 DRAWN BY: VJT CHECKED BY: RJA REVISIONS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 1 10-28-11 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION RJA 2 02-07-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION RJA 3 6-05-12 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION MEV 4 8-14-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 5 9-20-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 6 9-28-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV VILL �� pF WASFI�O '0 40908 ��•�'�y, TSTEg�� SSI0 SITE WA696 NE TACOMA 33914 19TH AVENUE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 FSHEET TITLE L NOTES AND SYMBOLS SHEET NUMBER G=2 11 SURVEY DISCLAIMER: PROPERTY LINES AND STRUCTURES HAVE BEEN DIGITIZED FROM PREVIOUS PLAN SETS OR FROM ASSESSORS MAPS. LDC HAS NOT COMPLETED A SITE SURVEY AND THEREFORE MAKES NO CLAIM AS TO THE ACCURACY OF INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS SHEET. SITE PLAN 22"x34" SCALE: 1 " = 100' 11 "x17" SCALE: 1" = 200' EXISTING AND PROPOSED AT&T EQUIPMENT WITHING EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER �0 Commercial Infrastructure Lw Residential THE CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP Telecom 14201 NE 200th St., #100 Ph. 425.806.1869 Woodinville, WA 98072 Fx. 425.482.2893 www.LDCcorp.com DATE: 10-28-11 DRAWN BY: VJT CHECKED BY: RJA REVISIONS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 1 10-28-11 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION RJA 2 02-07-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION RJA 3 6-05-12 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION MEV 4 8-14-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 5 9-20-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 6 9-28-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV WAR 40908� STER�� SITE WA696 NE TACOMA 33914 19TH AVENUE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER A=1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN KEYED NOTES 0 U 0 0 0 I N Q I 0 U M N I / c 0 U c 0 U c .3 0 0 / E 0 U O F- W z rn I Q NOTE: EXISTING CONCRETE FOUNDATION TO BE LOWERED 12" MIN. BELOW GRADE. i i >UNDERGROUND/ CO 1 \ f \� v �4_ \ \ J 1�' F / Ggr�r>> C%16 F OVERHEAD I O PROPOSED AT&T CONDUIT ROUTE. 2 A-4 OPROPOSED AT&T COAX CABLE ROUTE. OPROPOSED AT&T (1) RAYCAP DC SUPPRESSION MOUNTED BELOW e ANTENNA LEVEL ON EXISTING LIGHT POLE. RF-2 OPROPOSED AT&T 70OMHZ RRH UNIT UNISTRUT MOUNTED BELOW e ANTENNA LEVEL ON EXISTING LIGHT POLE. RF-2 OPROPOSED AT&T AWS RRH UNIT UNISTRUT MOUNTED BELOW e ANTENNA LEVEL ON EXISTING LIGHT POLE. RF 2 PROPOSED AT&T LTE PANEL ANTENNA TO BE ADDED TO AN EXISTING 4-5 O(3) SECTOR ANTENNA ARRAY (1) LTE ANTENNA PER SECTOR FOR A RF-2 TOTAL OF (3) NEW LTE ANTENNAS. OPROPOSED AT&T LTE GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED NEXT TO EXISTING GPS ANTENNA ON EQUIPMENT SHELTER ROOF. RF-2 e OEXISTING 95'-0" LIGHT POLE (TO BE REPLACED). OEXISTING AT&T FIF RACK TO HOUSE LTE EQUIPMENT (TO REMAIN). A 4 10 EXISTING AT&T GPS ANTENNA (TO REMAIN). 11 EXISTING AT&T UMTS CABINET (TO REMAIN). 12 EXISTING AT&T GSM CABINET WITH (3) BATTERY STRINGS (TO INSTALL (5) BATTERY STRINGS, (11) TOTAL NEEDED). 13 EXISTING AT&T ARGUS POWER CABINET (TO INSTALL DC CONVERTOR & (1) DC6 SURGE SUPPRESSOR, REMOVE (1) EMPTY BATTERY SHELF). 15 EXISTING AT&T UNISTRUT MOUNTED UTILITY FRAME (TO REMAIN). 16 EXISTING AT&T CMU EQUIPMENT SHELTER (TO REMAIN). 17 EXISTING AT&T WALL MOUNTED AUXILIARY (TO REMAIN). 18 PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNA MOUNT. e RF-2 QO EXISTING AT&T ELEVATED WALL MOUNTED TRANSFORMER (TO REMAIN). 21 EXISTING AT&T TELCO BOARD (TO REMAIN). QEXISTING AT&T TELCO BOX (TO REMAIN). Q3 EXISTING AT&T GENERATOR PLUG (TO REMAIN). QEXISTING AT&T HVAC UNIT (TO REMAIN). QEXISTING AT&T COAX ENTRY PORT (TO REMAIN). QEXISTING AT&T COAX SHROUD (TO REMAIN). QEXISTING AT&T COAX RACK (TO REMAIN). 28 EXISTING AT&T RXAIT RACK (TO REMAIN). 31 REPLACEMENT 103'-0" LIGHT POLE. ENGINEERING BY OTHERS. SEE SITE NOTE NO. 2. 33 PROPOSED AT&T DOGHOUSE. SITE NOTES 1. VERIFY ANTENNA MODEL, RAD CENTER & AZIMUTHS WITH LOCKDOWN SET RF SITE BUILD FORM. 2. ANALYSIS OF TOWER & FOUNDATION SHALL BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS & STAMPED BY A LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 3. EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL FOR LOCATES PRIOR TO DIGGING. 4. CROSS SECTOR REDUNDANCY BETWEEN THE PROPOSED RRH UNITS SHALL BE UTILIZED PER AT&T STANDARDS. LDCCommercial Infrastructure Residential THE CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP Telecom 14201 NE 200th St., #100 Ph. 425.806.1869 Woodinville, WA 98072 Fx. 425.482.2893 www.LDCcorp.com DATE: 10-28-11 DRAWN BY: VJT CHECKED BY: RJA REVISIONS REV DATEI DESCRIPTION BY 1 10-28-11 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION RJA 2 02-07-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION RJA 3 6-05-12 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION MEV 4 8-14-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 5 9-20-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 6 9-28-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV E• VIL �� pF WASgIp� C� 40908 - STER�� SITE WA696 NE TACOMA 33914 19TH AVENUE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 E SHEET TITLE ARGED SITE PLAN ENLARGED SITE PLAN 22"x34" SCALE: 1 /2" = 1'-0" 11"x17" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 1 SHEET NUMBER 1 w N 0 N 0 U O a� 0 r NOTES; 1. A POST CONSTRUCTION ILLUMINATION LEVEL FIELD TEST REPORT IS REQUIRED. 2. RELOCATED FIELD LIGHTS TO BE INSTALLED PER "LDC" PHOTOMETRIC LAYOUT DESIGN. I 1 2 EXISTING AT&T EQUIPMENT SHELTER CONSTRUCTION PLAN KEYED NOTES OPROPOSED AT&T CONDUIT ROUTE. A-4 2 O2 PROPOSED AT&T COAX CABLE ROUTE. OPROPOSED AT&T (1) RAYCAP DC SUPPRESSION MOUNTED BELOW e ANTENNA LEVEL ON EXISTING LIGHT POLE. RF-2 OPROPOSED AT&T 70OMHZ RRH UNIT UNISTRUT MOUNTED BELOW e ANTENNA LEVEL ON EXISTING LIGHT POLE. RF-2 OPROPOSED AT&T AWS RRH UNIT UNISTRUT MOUNTED BELOW e ANTENNA LEVEL ON EXISTING LIGHT POLE. RF-Z PROPOSED AT&T LTE PANEL ANTENNA TO BE ADDED TO AN EXISTING 4-5 O(3) SECTOR ANTENNA ARRAY (1) LTE ANTENNA PER SECTOR FOR A RF-2 TOTAL OF (3) NEW LTE ANTENNAS. OPROPOSED AT&T LTE GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED NEXT TO EXISTING e GPS ANTENNA ON EQUIPMENT SHELTER ROOF. RF-2 OEXISTING 95'-0" LIGHT POLE (TO BE REPLACED). TOP OF EXISTING MONOPOLE 95'-0" AGL 10 EXISTING AT&T GPS ANTENNA (TO REMAIN). 14 EXISTING AT&T ANTENNA (TO BE REPLACED). 16 EXISTING AT&T CMU EQUIPMENT SHELTER (TO REMAIN). 18 PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNA MOUNT. e RF-2 19 PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNA. e RF-2 2Q EXISTING AT&T TELCO BOX (TO REMAIN). < EXISTING LIGHT CONTROL (TO REMAIN). 30 EXISTING ANTENNA MOUNT (TO BE RELOCATED). 31 REPLACEMENT 103'-0" LIGHT POLE. ENGINEERING BY OTHERS. SEE SITE NOTE NO. 2. 32 RELOCATED ANTENNA MOUNT. 33 PROPOSED AT&T DOGHOUSE. SITE NOTES 1. VERIFY ANTENNA MODEL, RAD CENTER & AZIMUTHS WITH LOCKDOWN SET RF SITE BUILD FORM. 2. ANALYSIS OF TOWER & FOUNDATION SHALL BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS FINISH GRADE & STAMPED BY A LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 0'-0" AGL 3. EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL FOR LOCATES PRIOR TO DIGGING. -- -- EXISTING AT&T EQUIPMENT SHELTER 4. CROSS SECTOR REDUNDANCY BETWEEN THE PROPOSED RRH UNITS SHALL BE UTILIZED PER AT&T STANDARDS. LDCCommercial Infrastructure Residential THE CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP Telecom 14201 NE 200th St., #100 Ph 425.806.1869 Woodinville, WA 98072 Fx. 425.482.2893 www.LDCcorp.com DATE: 10-28-11 DRAWN BY: VJT CHECKED BY: RJA REVISIONS REV DATEI DESCRIPTION BY 1 10-28-11 1 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION RJA 2 02-07-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION RJA 3 6-05-12 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION MEV 4 8-14-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 5 9-20-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 6 9-28-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV E• VIL �� pF WAsgjh'�Cz 40908 SSI0NAL SITE WA696 NE TACOMA 33914 19TH AVENUE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 SHEET TITLE [:: ELEVATION 0 PROPOSED NORTHEAST ELEV. (LOOKING SOUTHWEST) 2 22 x34 SCALE: 1/8 = 1 -0 11 x17 SCALE: 1/16 = 1'-0" EXISTING NORTHEAST ELEV. (LOOKING SOUTHWEST 22"x34" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" I 11 "x17" SCALE: 1 /16" = 1'-0" SHEET NUMBER A=3 NOT USED NOT TO SCALE MANUFACTURER: ALCATEL - LUCENT MODEL: 9926 BBU HEIGHT: 19" WIDTH: 3.469"; 2U (RACK UNITS) DEPTH: 11.81" WEIGHT: 26 LBS 00 19.00" TOP owO F1 o oIyG w 00 O. =SIM (6) 6" SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT W/ 2 COAX EA. (2 FUTURE) NOT USED NOT TO SCALE 1 15 EXCAVATION 21-0" WARNING TAPE \\�/ UNEXCAVATED =_- _ - _ \/\ % AREA TT— 0-.* i \\�/ COMPACTED FILL COMPACTED SAND SEE DETAIL 3/A-4 DC POWER [EMPTY] DC/DC CONVERTER [EMPTY] ALU/BBU FIBER CABLE ENCLOSURE 1' FUTURE ALU/BBU TELCO W u EE DETAIL A-4 EXISTING FIF RACK CONFIGURATION 14 NOT TO SCALE 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 8 0 o 0 0 0 0 STANDARD 19" EQUIPMENT RACK REMOVABLE COVER 0 REMOVABLE 19" RACK EAR, TYP MANUFACTURER:ROSENBERGER MODEL: FB-15-ABOX CEQ 10505 EXCESS FIBER CABLE ENCLOSURE DIMENSIONS: 17"W X 1-3/4"H (1 U) X 12"D CAPACITY: 20m (65'±) OF 10MM CABLE kil 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 L a Q Commercial Infrastructure LDCResidential THE CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP Telecom 14201 NE 200th St., #100 Ph. 425.806.1869 Woodinville, WA 98072 Fx. 425.482.2893 www.LDccorp.com F E: 10-28-11 WN BY: VJT CKED BY: RJA REVISIONS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 1 10-28-11 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION RJA 2 02-07-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION RJA 3 6-05-12 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION MEV 4 8-14-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 5 9-20-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 6 9-28-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 40908 STEg�� ssloivni. E�� SITE WA696 NE TACOMA 33914 19TH AVENUE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 7 SHEET TITLE F ONSTRUCTION DETAILS RACK MOUNTED BBU DETAIL COAX CONDUIT DETAIL 3 3 2 o NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE EXCESS FIBER CABLE ENCLOSURE NOT TO SCALE SHEET NUMBER A=4 N 0 N 0 V 0 0 n PROPOSED ANTENNA CONFIGURATION AND SCHEDULE SECTOR A AZIMUTH RADCENTER NUMBER OF ANTENNAS VENDOR MODEL ELEC. TILT MECH. TILT TMA FEEDER LENGTH COAX O COAX LENGTH GSM 850 165° 90, 1 DBSPECTRA SPD2P6516XLH 10 0° NONE 2 7/8" 121' UMTS 850 901 1 ° NONE 2 7/8" 121' UMTS 1900 90' 20 (2) LGP 21401 UMTS 1900 1 90, LTE 700 1650 100, 1 KMW AM-X-CD-16-65-OOT 120 20 1 1 FIBER 121' SECTOR B AZIMUTH RADCENTER NUMBER OF ANTENNAS VENDOR MODEL ELEC. TILT MECH. TILT TMA FEEDER LENGTH COAX O COAX LENGTH GSM 850 2700 90, 1 DBSPECTRA SPD2P6516XLH 10 p° NONE 2 7/8" 121' UMTS 850 90, 10 NONE 2 7/8" 121' UMTS 1900 90' 2° (2) LGP 21401 UMTS 1900 gp, LTE 700 2700 99, 1 KMW AM-X-CD-17-65-OOT 40 00 1 FIBER 121' SECTOR C AZIMUTH RADCENTER NUMBER OF ANTENNAS VENDOR MODEL ELEC. TILT MECH. TILT TMA FEEDER LENGTH COAX O COAX LENGTH GSM 850 300 90, 1 DBSPECTRA SPD2P6516XLH 20 p° NONE 2 7/8" 121' UMTS 850 90, 20 NONE 2 7/8" 121' UMTS 1900 90' 3° (2} LGP 21401 UMTS 1900 gp, LTE 700 300 99, 1 KMW AM-X-CD-17-65-OOT 30 0° 1 FIBER 121' RFDS DATE: 07/23/12 VERSION: 4.0 PROPOSED AT&T 700h eMOUNTED BELOW AN7 RF-2 LEVEL (TYP (1) PER SE ePROPOSED AT&T LTE RF-2 PANEL ANTENNA SECTOF PROPOSED AT&T AW< eMOUNTED BELOW AN' RF-2 LEVEL (TYP (1) PER SE G �V L41 PROPOSED AT&T LTE PANEL ANTENNA e RF-2 PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNA s MOUNT (TYP (1) PER SECTOR) RF-2 REPLACEMENT 10T LIGHT POLE PROPOSED AT&T (1) RAYCAP DC SURPPRESSOR MOUNTED BELOW e RF-2 ANTENNAS LEVEL PROPOSED AT&T LTE e PANEL ANTENNA RF-2 PROPOSED ANTENNA CONFIGURATION @ 99' RAD CENTER 22"x34" SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" 1 11 "x17" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" LACEMENT 103' LIGHT POLE SECTOR I LOCATED AT&T ANTENNA )UNT ePROPOSED AT&T PANEL RF-2 ANTENNA 3 EXISTING ANTENNA CONFIGURATION AND SCHEDULE SECTOR A AZIMUTH RADCENTER NUMBER OF ANTENNAS VENDOR MODEL ELEC. TILT MECH. TILT TMA FEEDER LENGTH COAX O COAX LENGTH GSM 850 1650 90, 1 POWERWAVE 7785 20 00 NONE 4 7/8" 121' UMTS 850 90' 20 00 NONE UMTS 1900 90, 20 00 LGP 21401 UMTS 1900 1 90, 20 00 LGP 21401 SECTOR B AZIMUTH RADCENTER NUMBER OF ANTENNAS VENDOR MODEL ELEC. TILT MECH. TILT TMA FEEDER LENGTH COAX O COAX LENGTH GSM 850 2700 90, 1 POWERWAVE 7785 20 00 NONE 4 7/8" 121' UMTS 850 90' 20 00 NONE UMTS 1900 90, 20 00 LGP 21401 UMTS 1900 1 90, 20 00 LGP 21401 SECTOR C AZIMUTH RADCENTER NUMBER OF ANTENNAS VENDOR MODEL ELEC. TILT MECH. TILT TMA FEEDER LENGTH COAX O COAX LENGTH GSM 850 300 90, 1 POWERWAVE 7785 30 00 NONE 4 7/8" 121' UMTS 850 90, 30 00 NONE UMTS 1900 90, 30 00 LGP 21401 UMTS 1900 1 90' 30 00 LGP 21401 RFDS DATE: 07/23/12 VERSION: 4.0 SECTOR B EXISTING AT&T ANTENNA (TO BE REPLACED) TYP UNO t EXISTING 95' LIGHT POLE (TO BE REPLACED) EXISTING AT&T ANTENNA MOUNT (TO BE RELOCATED) 16°35'E f LDCCommercial Infrastructure Residential THE CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP Telecom 14201 NE 200th St., #100 Ph 425.806 1869 Woodinville WA 98072 Fx 425.482 2893 www.LDCcorp.com DATE: 10-28-11 DRAWN BY: VJT CHECKED BY: RJA REVISIONS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 1 10-28-11 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION RJA 2 02-07-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION RJA 3 6-05-12 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION MEV 4 8-14-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 5 9-20-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 6 9-28-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV YZ •WAS��Q� 40908 �EG'STEg1 1 0 SSI4NAL �� , 4 SITE WA696 NE TACOMA 33914 19TH AVENUE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 SHEET TITLE E ENNA CONFIGURATIONS SHEET NUMBER 0 PROPOSED ANTENNA CONF/GURATiON @ 90' RAD CENTER 22"x34" SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" 1 11 "x17" SCALE: 3/8" = V-0" z EXISTING ANTENNA CONFIGURATION @ 90' RAD CENTER 22"x34" SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" I 11 "x17" SCALE: 3/8'" = 1'-0" t RF=1 LDCCommercial Infrastructure Residential THE CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP Telecom 14201 NE 200th St., #100 Ph. 425.806.1869 Woodinville, WA 98072 Fx. 425.482.2893 www.LDCcorp.com DATE: 10-28-11 DRAWN BY: VJT CHECKED BY: RJA REVISIONS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 1 10-28-11 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION RJA 2 02-07-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION RJA 3 6-05-12 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION MEV 4 8-14-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 5 9-20-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 6 9-28-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV Waste Lp� 40908 cv� GISTEg�� ?+N ssI0NAL G� SITE WA696 NE TACOMA 33914 19TH AVENUE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 SHEET TITLE RF DETAILS 1 SHEET NUMBER 1 RF=2 0 U 0 0 EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO BE REMOVED GROUNDING KEYED NOTES O CAD WELD (TYP). SEE DETAIL 2/E-2. EXISTING ANTENNA GROUND BUS BAR NEAR ANTENNAS WITH COAX OGROUND KIT. SEE DETAIL 6/E-2 FOR GROUND BAR CONSTRUCTION. SEE DETAIL 5/E-2 FOR GROUND WIRE CONNECTIONS, AND SEE DETAIL 3/E-2 FOR COAX GROUNDING. OEXISTING POLE GROUND BUS BAR AT BASE OF POLE. SEE DETAIL 6/E-2 FOR GROUND BAR CONSTRUCTION. O#6 AWG ANTENNA MOUNT GROUND TO ANTENNA GROUND BUS BAR (TYP OF 3). O5 EXISTING GROUND FROM ANTENNA GROUND BUS BAR TO POLE GROUND BUS BAR (TYP OF (2) PLACES). O#6 AWG AWS RRH UNIT GROUND TO ANTENNA GROUND BUS BAR (TYP OF 3). O#6 AWG 700 RRH UNIT GROUND TO ANTENNA GROUND BUS BAR (TYP OF 3). O#6 AWG RAYCAP DC SUPPRESSOR GROUND TO ANTENNA GROUND BUS BAR. O#6 AWG LTE EQUIPMENT CABINET TO TIE INTO EXISTING SYSTEM GROUND RING. GENERAL GROUNDING NOTES 1. ALL DETAILS ARE SHOWN IN GENERAL TERMS. ACTUAL INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION MAY VARY DUE TO SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS. 2. GROUND ALL ANTENNA BASES, FRAMES, CABLE RUNS, AND OTHER METALLIC COMPONENTS USING GROUND WIRES AND CONNECT TO SURFACE MOUNTED BUS BARS. FOLLOW ANTENNA AND BTS MANUFACTURER'S PRACTICES FOR GROUNDING REQUIREMENTS. GROUND COAX SHIELD AT BOTH ENDS AND EXIT FROM TOWER OR POLE USING MFR'S PRACTICES. 3. ALL GROUND CONNECTIONS SHALL BE CADWELD. ALL WIRES SHALL BE COPPER THHN/THWN. ALL GROUND WIRE SHALL BE GREEN INSULATED WIRE ABOVE GROUND. 4. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AND TEXT GROUND SOURCE, GROUNDING AND OTHER OPERATIONAL TESTING WILL BE WITNESSED BY AT&T, LLC REPRESENTATIVE. 5. REFER TO DIVISION 16 GENERAL ELECTRIC; GENERAL ELECTRICAL PROVISION AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF GROUNDING STANDARDS. 6. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE DETAILED DESIGN OF GROUNDING SYSTEM, AND RECEIVE APPROVAL OF DESIGN BY AUTHORIZED AT&T, LLC REPRESENTATIVE, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF GROUNDING SYSTEM. PHOTO DOCUMENT ALL CALDWELDS AND GROUND RINGS. 7. NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IF THERE ARE ANY DIFFICULTIES INSTALLING GROUNDING SYSTEM DUE TO SITE SOIL CONDITIONS. GROUNDING LEGEND GROUND BAR Q GROUND INSPECTION WELL COPPER GROUND ROD CADWELD CONNECTION SIDE SPLICE CADWELD FIELD VERIFY & TIE INTO EXISTING GROUNDING SYSTEM GROUNDING ROD NOTES (WHERE APPLICABLE) 1. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL ORDER GROUND RESISTANCE TESTING ONCE THE GROUND SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSTALLED; A QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL, UTILIZING THE FALL OF POTENTIAL METHOD, SHOULD PERFORM THE TEST. THE REPORT WILL SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE TEST AND CONTAIN NO LESS THAN 9 TEST POINTS ALONG THE TESTING LINE, GRAPHED OUT TO SHOW THE PLATEAU. 2. POINT GROUND TEST OR 3 POINT 62% TESTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AS ALTERNATIVES TO THE AFORE MENTIONED GROUND TESTS. TEST SHALL BE PERFORMED WHILE THE COUNTERPOISE IS ISOLATED FROM THE A/C SYSTEM GRIDS AND EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY. PROPRIETARY INFORMA TION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AT&T, LLC. SERVICES ARE STRICTLY PROHIBITED. 4 Q LDCCommercial Infrastructure Residential THE CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP Telecom 14201 NE 200th St., #100 Ph. 425.806.1869 Woodinville, WA 98072 Fx. 425.482.2893 www.LDCcorp.com FD10-28-11 DRAWN BY: VJT CHECKED BY: RJA REVISIONS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 1 10-28-11 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION RJA 2 02-07-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION RJA 3 6-05-12 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION MEV 4 8-14-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 5 9-20-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 6 9-28-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV INASgl�� O 40908� STER�� SSI-NAL SITE WA696 NE TACOMA 33914 19TH AVENUE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 ESHEET TITLE SCHEMATIC GROUNDING PLAN SCHEMATIC GROUNDING SITE PLAN 22"x34" SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 11"x17" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" i SHEET NUMBER E=1 0 N N m C a c a 3 z I I C C Il. NEW COAXIAL GROUND KITS W/LONG BARREL COMPRESSION DOUBLE LUGS, ATTACH TO GROUND BAR & INSTALL BY ANTENNA #6 AWG FROM ANTENNA CONTRACTOR (CADWELD TYPE—GL) CABLE GROUND KIT COPPER GROUND BAR ON (TYPICALLY NEW 4"x24"x1/4 THK COPPER GROUND BAR. WALL, ICE BRIDGE, FLOOR OR ON ANTENNA TOWER 12" TO 24" 10 INSTALLED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR 120" MAX ANTENNA CABLE GROUND ISOLATOR (TYP 2 1/2" O AT EACH GROUND BAR) Q Q MAX 0000 00 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 000 Q 0 0 0 0 Q Q Q 00) O O O WEATHERPROOFING O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q KIT (SEE NOTE 3) CABLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q CABLE GROUND KIT CONNECTOR #6 AWG STRANDED COPPER GROUND WIRE (GROUNDED TO Q O GROUND BAR). SEE NOTE 1 AND 2 26" MGB OR 6" ANTENNA MGB FIELD VERIFY *TWO HOLE LUG, OR EXOTHERMIC WELD TO BE USED WITH #2 AWG GROUND CONDUCTOR SHALL BE _ = BCW TO BUILDING SERVICE GROUND OR GROUND RING ELIMINATED WHEN GROUND BAR IS ELECTRICALLY BONDED TO METAL COPPER TOWER/MONOPOLE STRUCTURE #2 SOLID BARE TINNED WIRE CADWELD (TYPE—GL) NOTES 1. DO NOT INSTALL CABLE GROUND KIT AT A BEND AND ALWAYS DIRECT GROUND WIRE DOWN TO GROUND BAR. 2. GROUNDING KIT SHALL BE TYPE AND PART NUMBER AS NOTE NOTE SUPPLIED OR RECOMMENDED BY CABLE COAT ALL MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS GROUND BARS AT BOTTOM OF TOWERS/MONOPOLES MANUFACTURER. 3. WEATHER PROOFING SHALL BE TWO—PART TAPE KIT, WITH "NOOX" OR APPROVED EQUAL SHALL ONLY USE EXOTHERMIC WELDS. COLD SHRINK SHALL NOT BE USED. GROUND BAR 6 GROUND WIRE INSTALLATION 5 CABLE GROUND KIT CONNECTION NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE TO ANTENNAS COAX JUMPER (TYP) WEATHERPROOFING KIT (TYP) TYPE TA TYPE VN TYPE NC TYPE SS GROUND KIT (TYP) SEE DETAIL 4/E-2 CONNECTOR —_ WEATHERPROOFING KIT (TYP) SEE NOTE 2 #6 AWG ISOLATE FROM TOWER HALO W/ TYPE VV TYPE VS TYPE VB TYPE PT #2 TO LOWER TOWER BUS BAR ANTENNA CABLE TO O BTS EQUIPMENT (TYP) �OPP TO GROUND RING TYPE GT TYPE GY TYPE GR TYPE GL COPPER ANTENNA GROUND NOTES BAR, WITH INSULATORS. 1. DO NOT INSTALL CABLE GROUND KIT AT A BEND AND BONDED DIRECTLY TO TOP OF MONOPOLE OR UTILITY POLE. ALWAYS DIRECT GROUND WIRE DOWN TO ANTENNA GROUND BAR. 2. WEATHER PROOFING SHALL BE TWO—PART TAPE KIT. — COLD SHRINK SHALL NOT BE USED. L GROUND CABLE CONNECTION CADWELD GROUNDING CONNECTIONS NOT USED NOT TO SCALE NOT ALE TO SC NOT TO SCALE L a LDCCommercial Infrastructure Residential THE CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP Telecom 14201 NE 200th St., #100 Ph. 425.806.1869 Woodinville, WA 98072 Fx. 425.482.2893 www.LDCcorp.com DATE: 10-28-11 DRAWN BY: VJT CHECKED BY: RJA REVISIONS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 1 10-28-11 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION RJA 2 02-07-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION RJA 3 6-05-12 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION MEV 4 8-14-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 5 9-20-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV 6 9-28-12 FINAL CONSTRUCTION MEV �� p .WAS h'Q� 40908� STY, SITE WA696 NE TACOMA 33914 19TH AVENUE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 SHEET TITLE GROUNDING DETAILS SHEET NUMBER