Loading...
17-102034, 18-101348, 17-102125CITY OF Federal Way Centered on Opportunity Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma 317 SW 29511, Place Federal Way, WA 98023 SN't ri o Ct ' 11 .c CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Re: File #17-102034-00-UP (17-102125-00-AD); PROCESS III `PROJECT APPROVAL' Sharma Stream Buffer Intrusion, Parcel #119600-1285, Federal Way Dear Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma: Jim Ferrell, Mayor November 16, 2018 The City of Federal Way has completed the administrative review of the proposed stream buffer intrusion for a new single-family residence on a 17,000 square foot vacant parcel. The applicant proposes to construct a new single-family residence with a 1,500 square foot footprint, path, and driveway at the abovementioned parcel. Vehicle access is proposed from 2nd Avenue SW. A Type Np Stream and associate 50-foot stream buffer and Category IV wedand and associated 40-foot wetland buffer encumbers the subject property. The location of the house and improvements do not impact the stream, wetland, or wetland buffer; however, impacts to the stream buffer are unavoidable. The applicant has submitted a stream buffer intrusion request to modify or waive the requirements of the city's stream buffer and critical area regulations with a buffer enhancement plan, pursuant to FWRC 19.145.330. As part of the application materials, the applicant has provided the following information and plans: ■ Technical Memorandum - Peer Review Resubmittal No. 1, Landau Associates, March 13, 2018 • Technical Memorandum, Landau Associates, December 15, 2017 • Critical Areas Mitigation Addendum, Sewall Wetland Consulting, February 7, 2018 • Critical Areas Designation, Sewall Consulting, Inc., March 13, 2018 • Tree Retention and Landscape Plan, Ll-L2, prepared by ARW Landscape Design (resubmitted Mayl1, 2018) • Site, Grading & Utilities Plan, AP Consulting Engineers, PLLC, resubmitted August 6, 2018 • Geotechnical Evaluation Report, Agis Engineering, resubmitted August 6, 2018 The Process III application received May 4, 2017, and "Sharma Stream Bufferintrusion and Enhancement Plan," prepared by Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc., are hereby approved with conditions, based on the enclosed Exhibit A, T ndix,,sforl'rajs61Apprava4 incorporated into this decision in full, and the following conclusions based on those facts: 1. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan; 1. The proposal is consistent with all applicable provisions of Federal lVay Revised Code (FWRC); 2. The proposal is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare; 3. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal; 4. The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration; and 5. Traffic safety impacts for all modes of transportation, both on and off site, are adequately mitigated. Doc-1.D. 78479 17-102034-00-UP Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma Page 2 of 3 November 16, 2018 The remainder of this letter outlines the land use review process required, conditions of approval, and outlines procedure relating to appeals and approval periods for this decision. This land use decision does not authorize initiation of construction activities. REVIEW PROCESSES REQUIRED The site is within the residential Single -Family (RS9.6) zoning district. Detached dwelling units are permitted in this zone subject to the provisions of FWRC 19.200.100. Using Process III, ProjectApproval, the city can administratively approve a modification or waiver to FWRC Division V, Critical Areas, pursuant to FWRC 19.145.330, "Intrusions into stream buffers," subject to criteria. Process III approval does not grant license to begin any type of site work. SEPA PROCESS The application is exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) as it does not exceed city adopted flexible thresholds set forth in FWRC 14.15.030(a). CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Based on the criteria above, recommendations by the city's wetland consultant Landau Associates, Inc., the Sharma Stream Buffer Intrusions and Buffer Enhancement/Restoration, the proposed intrusion is approved as conditioned below. 1) Prior to construction, the applicant shall install a minimum of two stream and wetland buffer native growth protection area signs along the edge of the stream buffer. The content, location, and details shall be approved by the city prior to installation. 2) Prior to, and for the duration of, construction activity, the applicant must install temporary construction fencing or a physical barrier containing silt screening fabric along the approved stream buffer intrusion. To schedule a preconstruction inspection, contact Associate Planner Leila Willoughby -Oakes at or 253-835-2644. 3) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the building plans shall include a storm drainage system that conforms to storm drainage regulations that are in effect at the time the building permit application is submitted. 4) Prior to issuance of the building permit, an updated Certificate of Water Availability verifying connection to water services from 2.d Avenue SW is required. 5) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant must record with the King County Recorder's Office, a restrictive covenant prepared by the city. The covenant will state within the title, that no land surface modification may take place and no structure or improvement may be located in the stream or wetland buffer, other than intrusions approved under city file 17-102125-00-UP. 6) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall establish a five-year performance and stream buffer enhancement monitoring bond. BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE REQUIRED This Process III land use decision does not constitute building permit approval, or authorize clearing/grading activities. A single-family building permit application (file #18-104279-00-SF) was submitted to the city in 17-102031-00-UP Doc, I.D. 78479 Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma Page 3 of 3 November 16, 2018 September 2018, and an approval must occur prior to commencing work. If you have any questions regarding the building permit submittal requirements, please contact the Permit Center at 253-835-2607, or I)erttnitcenter ityoffedet l�;.com. APPROVAL DURATION Per FWRC 19.15.100(2), unless modified or appealed, the Process III decision is valid for a period of five years from the effective date of the decision. Time extensions to the decision may be requested prior to the lapse of approval following the provisions listcd in FWRC 19.15.110. The improvements must be substantially completed with n the five-year time period, or the land use decision becomes void. APPEAL Per FWRC 19.05.360, the effective date of issuance is three calendar days following the date of this letter, or November 19, 2018. Pursuant to FWRC 19.65.120(1), this land use decision may be appealed by the applicant, any person who submitted written comments or information, or any person who has specifically requested a copy of the decision. In complimice with FWRC 19.65.120(2), any appeals must be in the form of a letter delivered to the Department of Community Development, with the established fee, and within 14 Calendar days after the effective date of the decision, or December 3, 2018. The appeal letter must contain a clear reference to the matter being appealed and a statement of the factual findings and conclusions of the Director of Commmunity Development disputed by the person filing the appeal. The Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hear any appeals of the Process III decision. PROPERTY TAX VALUATION Per FWRC 19.65.100(4)(i), affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes, notwithstanding any program of revaluation. CLOSING This decision does not constitute building permit approval, and it does not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Associate Planner Leila Willoughby -Oakes at 253- 835-2644, or leiln willotiWll� *-c; akesitt�.cit, g fccieralwayrQ{}}. Sincerely, 1 Brian Davis Director of Community Development enc: Exhibit A, Findings for Project Approval Sharma Process III Approved Plan -Set (stamped "approved" November 13, 2018) c: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Associate Planner Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Robert "Doc" IIansen, Planning Manager Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Steve Qmrterman, Landau, aniz%rwrimn Qlandatlin M.1 e. Amp WolFn, ARW Landscape Design, imv�: v , s Isca yin n Ed Sewall, Sewall Wctland Consulting Inc, PO Box 880, Fall City, WA 98024, csc,,i 11 rr,tnni l We.CI1rTZ 17-102034-00-UP Doc. LD 78179 CITY ❑F CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way Federal Way, WA 3) 835-6325 7000 (253) 835-7000 entered on Opportunity wwwcityoffederalway.com Jim FerrPll, Mayor Exhibit A Findings for Project Approval Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.65 "Process III — Project Approval" Sharma Stream Buffer Intrusion, File #17-102034-00-UP The city hereby makes the following findings pursuant to content requirements of the Process III written decision as set forth in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.65.100(4) and FWRC 19.145.330, "Intrusions into stream buffers." I. Proposal — The applicant proposes a single-family residence with a maximum footprint of 1,500 square feet, driveway, walk -way, and 10-foot wide yard around the home. The proposal will intrude a maximum width of 22 feet and approximately 1,000 square feet of structural footprint will be located in the 50-foot stream buffer. A vegetated basic dispersion trench and flow path is also located in the buffer. No construction or development activities are proposed within the onsite Category IV Wetland and its buffer, and the onsite Type-Np perennial non -fish habitat stream. 2- Background — The applicant submitted a Process III application to the city on May 4, 2017. The Process III stream buffer intrusion application was deemed incomplete on June 13, 2017. The applicant resubmitted plans on August 29, 2017, and the application was deemed complete on September 12, 2017, Project resubmittals occurred on August 31, 2017, May 11, 2017, and August 6, 2018, in response to the City of Federal Way Development Review Committee's (DRC) and the city's wetland consultant, Landau Associates Inc. (LAI), comments. Site Conditions — Tax parcel #119600-1285 is located in the Plat of Buenna at the corner of SW 290' Street and 2" d Avenue SW in a single-family neighborhood with similarly sized homes. The 0.39 acre parcel is vacant and contains a dense understory and herbaceous layer of native plants and trees within a wetland and stream buffer. The applicant proposes direct access from 2"d Avenue SW, an unimproved public right-of-way. The area along 2"d Avenue SW proposed for site development is relatively flat; however, the remaining eastern half of the site is encumbered with geologically hazardous areas. There is a significant grade change along the eastern property -line. 4. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan — Zoning for the subject site is Residential Single -Family (RS 9.6). Construction of a detached dwelling unit is a permitted use in this zone subject to the provisions of FWRC 19.200.010. The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) designation for the property is Single Family — High Density. 5. Review Process —Due to the proposed intrusions into the stream buffer, a Use Process III "Project Approval" review is required under FWRC 19.65.100. Subsequent review and approval documents I-- indings for Project Approval 17-102034-00-UP / Doc. I.D. 78480 Sharma Stream Buffer Intrusion & Enhancement Plan Page l of 7 include a Stream Buffer Enhancement Plan, proposed area of disturbance, structure footprint, and associated site improvements normally associated with a single-family residence. 6. Environmental Review —The application is exempt from review under the .State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) as it does not exceed city adopted flexible thresholds set forth in FWRC 14.15.030(a) for construction of residential structures up to 20 dwelling units. No work is planned within the wetlands. 7. Public Notice and Comment — The application was deemed complete on September 12, 2017, and a Notice of Application was posted on October 6, 2017. The notice was posted at the subject property, posted at each of the city's official notification boards, published in the Federal Way Mirror, and mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. The comment period concluded on October 20, 2017, and no comments were received. Required Yards & Height — Under FWRC 19.200.010, a detached dwelling unit in the RS7.2 zoning district shall have a minimum 20-foot front yard setback, 5-foot side and rear yard setback, and a maximum lot coverage of 60 percent. The applicant complies with the maximum impervious coverage, and proposes 3,187 square feet of lot coverage (13 percent). The maximum permitted building height is 30 feet above average building elevation. The proposed building shall meet all of these dimensional requirements at the time of a building permit submittal. Please see Approval Finding #9 outlining permitted front yard modifications. Reduced Front Yard Setback — F WRC 19.120.110(6) allows deviations the front yard setback requirements in Single Family Residential zones. Front yard setbacks for single-family residential development on lots with a slope of 15 percent or greater may be applied in a flexible manner where such application will protect slopes and natural features from development encroachments. However, a minimum front yard setback of 10 feet must be maintained in all cases, and a minimum 20 foot setback shall apply to garages, unless the garage and driveway are oriented in such a way as to provide minimum 20 feet length of parking area in front of the garage within the property boundaries. The proposal site contains slopes 15 percent and greater. Plans resubmitted May 2018 depicts parking area length of parking area in front of the garage. Therefore the residence may be setback 10-feet from the front property -line. 10. Critical Areas — Process III plans depict the 40-foot wetland buffer within the 50-foot stream buffer. Landau, the city's consultant, concurs with the applicant's classification of the stream as a Type Np (perennial non -fish habitat stream) with a 50-foot buffer and Category IV wetland delineation with a 40-foot wetland buffer. A five-foot critical area building setback shall apply to the edge of the wetland and stream buffer, unless otherwise authorized by this land use decision. Critical area signage and split rail fencing shall also be installed at the edge of the critical area buffer unless otherwise stated in these findings. 11. Unauthorized Critical Area Alterations — As a condition of land use approval, the applicant shall restore areas as indicated in the stream buffer enhancement plan prepared by Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. (resubmitted May 11, 2018) and associated landscaping plans, of unauthorized vegetation and tree removal which has occurred in the past within the wetland and stream buffers. The city's consultant, Landau, noted clearing actions on their site visit and reviews in 2017 and 2018. AI observed an area of clearing of understory during their site visit within the central portion of the site. Pursuant to FWRC 19.145 the applicant is required to replant and restore the critical area (stream and wetland buffer) as part of this Process III decision. Findings for Project Approval 17-102034-00-UP / Doc. I.D. 78480 Sharma Stream Buffer Intrusion & Enhancement Plan Page 2 of 7 12. Project Mitigation Sequencing — The applicant reduced the building footprint initially proposed from 1,800 square feet to 1,500 square feet. On subsequent revisions, the proposed building footprint shifted to the northeast corner of the subject property, resulting in a reduced stream buffer disturbance in overall area. As the site is highly encumbered it is not feasible for the applicant to completely avoid a stream buffer intrusions pursuant to FWRC 19.145.130(1), and the applicant intends to install critical area split rail fencing around the perimeter of the home footprint; reducing the risk of further critical area buffer encroachments by the new owner. The house plan modification from a square to a rectangular design to avoid stream buffer stream buffer encroachment was minimized to the greatest extent feasible. Further, this proposal underwent additional redesign to avoid development and land disturbance within the Category IV the wetland buffer. 13. Stream Buffer Intrusion — Pursuant to FWRC 19.145.330, stream buffer intrusions may be permitted with a buffer enhancement plan .Staff has provided the following analysis of the criteria: a) It will not adversely affect water quality. Staff Response —This criterion has been met. Water quality will not be adversely affected by this proposal to reduce the required buffer width. During construction related to the house, driveway, and improvements, the applicant will be required to implement a physical barrier between the stream and development —a temporary erosion and sediment control plan to be reviewed and approved by the city. After construction, the applicant will be required to stabilize and replant any disturbed areas within the stream buffer that will not have a permanent disturbance. The riparian corridor will be planted as part of_the proposal, and the reduction of stream buffer width requested should not adversely affect water quality if stormwater management BMPs is implemented correctly. b) It will not adversely affect the existing quality of wildlife habitat within the stream or setback area. ,Staff Response — This criterion has been met. Wildlife habitat will not be adversely affected by this proposal to reduce the required buffer width. City staff recommends a condition of approval to require design and implementation of a final stream buffer enhancement plan by a Certified Ecologist, as mitigation for the proposal and associated stream buffer reduction. The stream restoration plan shall include provisions for environmental goals and objectives, performance standards, detailed construction plans, timing, monitoring for five years, contingency plan, and a financial guarantee of construction, maintenance, and monitoring at the applicant's expense. c) It will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention capabilities. Staf'Response — This criterion has been met. Drainage and stormwater conditions will not be adversely affected by this proposal to reduce the required buffer width from 50 to approximately 20 feet average width. The enhanced stream channel will provide improved drainage capabilities, increase conveyance capacity, and mitigate or resolve existing critical area disturbances and understory removal by prior property owners identified in the applicant's critical areas report and subsequent addendums prepared by Sewall Consulting. All proposed improvements must meet applicable regulations in the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manua! (KCSWDM), and be reviewed and approved by the city. d) It will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards. Findings for Project Approval 17-102034-00-UP / DOc.1.D. 78480 Sharma Stream Buffer Intrusion & Enhancement Plan Page 3 of 7 Staff Response — This criterion has been met. Erosion and unstable earth conditions will not be created by this proposal to reduce the required buffer width from 50 to approximately 28 feet average width. To minimize erosion, the developer has proposed to convey runoff from downspouts to an on -site dispersion system. A drainage vegetated trench and vegetated area of conveyance is proposed is proposed to treat driveway runoff before it enters the stream, and amended soils are proposed for all disturbed areas on the site to help detain and filter storinwater runoff. Native plant materials are proposed for the stream buffer enhancements to help stabilize the existing slopes on site and newly created slopes. An engineered design for Erosion and Sedimentation Control (ESC) must be provided to the city as part of the building plans. The ESC measures and long term riparian corridor planting should mitigate the potential for erosion. e) It will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area of the subject property nor to the city as a whole, including the loss of significant open space. Staff Response — Given the existing developed nature of the subject property and surrounding area, the granting of this stream buffer reduction will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area of the subject property nor to the city as a whole, including the loss of significant open space. The site is in a developed residential neighborhood. Further, the applicant proposes to replant an area exceeding the proposed area of disturbance in the stream buffer. The neighboring property was granted a similar stream buffer intrusion reduction by the Federal Way Hearing Examiner. The stream buffer reduction request for the adjoining property to the north was approved by the Federal Way Hearing Examiner in 2015 (Process IV file 13-102595- UP). It reduced the required stream setback for exceeding the proposed percentage of new site improvements on this proposal. The proposed property development is subject to all applicable development codes, which will mitigate potential impacts. In addition, the project will be monitored for a minimum of five years, ensuring the stream buffer enhancement plan performs to the standards set by the city and approved critical area mitigation plan. f) It is necessary for some reasonable development of the subject property. Staff Response — Currently, under existing conditions with the existing stream buffer delineation and width, avoidance of intrusions into the stream buffer are unavoidable. Areas on the property which are not encumbered by a wetland or stream buffer, wetland, stream, or geologically hazardous area are very limited. In particular, the majority of unencumbered Areas are located directly along 2nd Avenue SW, up to the right-of-way dedication line. Further, most unencumbered areas are primarily within the required front and side yard setbacks of 20 feet and 5 feet. The city has authorized this proposal to reduce the a front yard setback from 20 feet to 10 feet, subject to conditions (a minimum 20 foot parking area length) as the property contains geologically hazardous areas and a steep slope as permitted by the city's clearing and grading regulations of the FWRC. The requested stream buffer reduction is necessary for some reasonable development of the property comparable to surrounding properties. Granting approval to construct a larger house Findings for Project Approval 17-102034-00-UP / Doc. I.D. 78480 Sharma Stream Buffer Intrusion & Enhancement Plan Page 4 of 7 footprint than the proposed would potentially be a grant of special privilege and does not comply with the city's critical area ordinance mitigation sequencing requirements, which includes avoidance and minimization of critical area impacts. Therefore, city staff supports the requested stream buffer intrusion request as shown on the site plan, in order to construct a new single-family residence with a building footprint of up to 1,500 square feet in size, along with driveway areas and improvements as shown on the proposed site plan. 14. Stream Buffer Enhancement Plan — The project's stream buffer enhancement plan will include the establishment of a native upland plant community by installing 126 native plantings within approximately 5,353 square feet of on -site wetland and stream buffer. Site work will also include the removal of noxious weed species within the stream buffer area; therefore, minimizing and improving the overall function of the riparian corridor per the applicant's critical area report and preliminary landscaping plans prepared by ARW Landscape Designs. 15. Monitoring Plan & Performance (Buffer Enhancement) — The applicant proposes to monitor the mitigation area for five years pursuant to FWRC 19.145.140(8). A performance and maintenance bond will be established with the city as a condition of the building permit approval and with the building permit the applicant shall provide the protocol for monitoring including a schedule for site monitoring and how the monitoring data will be evaluated to determine if performance standards are being met. The applicant shall provide to the city a final five year monitoring plan for the installation of the proposed stream buffer enhancements and wetland/stream buffer restoration plan prepared by a Certified Ecologist, to be approved by the Public Works and Community Development Departments prior to issuance of a building permit for a new single-family residence. The plan shall be implemented prior to Certificate of Occupancy of the new single-family residence. The final stream buffer enhancement plan shall include: ■ Performance standards; • Detailed construction plans; • Timing (i.e. appropriate planting seasons); • Monitoring for five years; + Contingency plan; and • A financial guarantee of construction, maintenance, and monitoring at the applicant's expense (i.e., a performance bond pursuant to the requirements of FWRC 19.145.100) prior to the final issuance of occupancy. 16. Notice on Title — Pursuant to FWRC 19.145.170, the applicant shall record a critical areas covenant, including the final construction site plan depicting all critical areas and their buffers, with the King County Recorder's Office prior to final occupancy, 17. Stormwater — Within the 0.39 acre project site, the single-family residence will develop approximately 13 percent of the area as impervious surface. The project is required to meet Conservation Flow Control and Enhanced Basic Water Quality requirements as outlined in the 2016 KCSWDM and City of Federal Way Addendum to the KCSWDM. A final Technical Information Report (TIR) will be required at the time of the building permit submittal. 18. Street Improvements — The Public Works Department did not approve the applicant's right-of-way modification request (city file 18-103048-00-SM). The proposal is subject to the Public Works Development Standards right-of-way standards, including improvements and right of way dedications. Findings for Project Approval 17-102034-00-UP / Doc. I.D. 78480 Sharma Stream Buffer Intrusion & Enhancement Plan Page 5 of 7 19. Traffic Impact Fee — The project is subject to a traffic impact fee (TIF) per FWRC 19.91. A traffic impact fee will be calculated at the time of the building permit and based on the fee in effect at the time a completed building permit application is filed., 20. School Mitigation Fee — The project is subject to a school impact fees as outlined in Chapter 19.95 FWRC, based on the fee in effect at the time a completed building permit application is filed. 21. Approval Duration — Per FWRC 19.15.100(2), the applicant must substantially complete construction for the development activity, and complete the applicable conditions listed in the Process III decision, within five years after the final decision of the city on the matter, or the decision becomes void. 22. Conditions ofApproval — The following conditions of approval are attached to the Process III decision and stream buffer intrusion approval. The Community Development Director determines the following conditions are reasonably necessary to eliminate or minimize any undesirable effects of granting a land use decision. These conditions contain therein become part of this Process III decision pursuant to FWRC 19.65.100(3). a. Prior to construction, the applicant shall install a minimum of two stream and wetland buffer native growth protection area signs along the edge of the stream buffer. The content, location, and details shall be approved by the city prior to installation. b. Prior to, and for the duration of construction activity, the applicant must install temporary construction fencing or a physical barrier containing silt screening fabric along the approved stream buffer intrusion. To schedule a preconstruction inspection, contact Associate Planner Leila Willoughby -Oakes at 253-835-2644, or lei la.►viIlou lib y oakes .cit offederaiwa .com. c. Prior to final occupancy, the final landscaping stream buffer enhancement plan shall include hydophytic species only. Upland species are not an acceptable for mitigation plantings. d. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the building plans shall include a storm drainage system that conforms to storm drainage regulations that are in effect at the time the building permit application is submitted. e. Prior to issuance of the building permit, an updated Certificate of Water Availability, verifying connection to water services from 2"dAvenue SW is required. f. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant must record with the King County Recorder's Office, a restrictive covenant prepared by the city. The covenant will state that no land surface modification may take place and no structure or improvement may be located in the stream or wetland buffer, other than intrusions approved under city file 17-102125-00-UP. g. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall establish a five-year performance and stream buffer enhancement monitoring bond. CONCLUSION As conditioned, the proposed site plan application and application attachments have been determined to be consistent with the FWCP, all applicable provisions of the FWRC, and with the public health, safety, and welfare. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal, and the access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration for access. The proposed development is consistent with Process III, Project Approval, decisional criteria required under FWRC 19.65.100(2)(a) and (2)(b). Findings for Project Approval 17-102034-00-UP / Doc. I.D. 78480 Sharma Stream Buffer Intrusion & Enhancement Plan Page 6 of 7 The proposed site plan and Process III application attachments have been reviewed for compliance with the FWCP, pertinent zoning regulations, and all other applicable city regulations. Final construction drawings will be reviewed for compliance with specific regulations, conditions of approval, and other applicable city requirements. This decision shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. Prepared by: Associate Planner Leila Willoughby -Oakes Date, November 14, 2018 Findings for Project Approval 17-102034.00-UP / Doc. I.D. 78480 Sharma Stream Buffer Intrusion & Enhancement Plan Page 7 of 7 Sewall Wetland Consultiin Inc. Po Box W Phone: 253-S559Z15 Fall City, WA 98M4 February 7, 2018 Subhash Sharma 317 SW 295th Place Federal Way, Washington 98023 RE: Critical Areas Mitigation Addendum- Parcel # 119600-1285 SWC Job # 17-127 Dear Sharma, This letter is in response to the December 15, 2017, Peer Review by Landau and Associates for your property. Belwo is a response to each item; Peer review comments regarding the Critical Areas Report include: 1) LAI wetlands staff canducted a reconnaissance of the subject property on December 5, 2017, and genes II oZree with the scream hnundary flagged and shown in the Critical Areas Report; however flags W-1 and A-1 should be shown connecting to the culvert to the south, a [stream alignment appears to continue east within the site north of flags W-9 and E-9. We agree with the wetland boundary flagged and shown in the Critical Areas Report. Within the flagged wetland, LAI observed dominance of hydrophytic vegetation, saturation and drainage pattern satisfying the wetland hydrology parameter; and soil profile satisfying the hydric soils parameter as a depleted matrix. LAI staff evaluated an area to the west of the stream that was observed with similar vegetated characteristics to the delineated wetland near wetland flag W-3, and noted soils did not, satisfy the hydric soils parameter at that location. Response: None needed. 2) LAI concurs with classification of the onsite stream as a Type Np iperennial non -fish habitat stream). Response: None needed. RESUBMITTED FEB 2 2 2018 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CaMMUN y DEVELOPMENT 1 Shanna/# 17-127 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. August 8, 2017 Page 2 3) The Critical Areas Report does not satisfy all of the evaluation criteria provided in FWRC 19.145A10(2.), A subsequent report will be required by the city to include the following items referenced in FWRC 19.145.410(2): (a) Critical area report information identified fn FWRC 19.145.080, specifically items: (e) photographs of the ske and critical areas; . S'�r•� - �� . + { ; l { a 1?r ° • �. ii �' r. j �, a�rf ^ • �� -� La , r ��k r C. -�-, .Y �. - _.BSI ��. '� �• •�:; -��[.. Y r }•fir- .� • -ri ti - �r : • � �� �� R!' y}�' ' , f , � , _ , � -..1 'mot Sh r a/# gQ 27 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. August $2I7 Page � ,�- \.yi// 6\\ 73 . . » ! /A Sharma/#17-127 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. August 8, 2017 Page 8 Sharma/# 17-127 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. August 8, 2017 Page 9 (g) A description of efforts mode to apply mitigation sequencing pursuant to FWRC 19.145,130 to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to critical areas; 19.145.130 Mitigation sequencing. I $HARE Applicants shall demonstrate that all reasonable efforts have been examined with the intent to avoid and minimize impacts to critical areas. When alteration to a critical area is proposed, such alteration shall be avoided, minimized, or compensated in the following order of preference: (1) Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; Response: The site is zoned for a single family home. To deny the construction of a single family home on the site would be a "taking" by the City and compensation for the property would be required by law to the owner. The denial of construction of a home is not feasible. (2) Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps, such as project redesign, relocation, or timing, to avoid or reduce impacts; Sharma/# 17-127 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. August 8, 2017 Page 10 Response: Impacts to critical areas have been minimized by moving the home as far to wets away from the stream and wetland as possible. The resulting site plan impacts only 3,022sf of stream buffer. No wetland or wetland buffer impacts are proposed. (3) Rectifying the impact to the critical area by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment to the conditions existing at the time of the initiation of the project; Response: Not applicable, the impact will be permanent. However, enhancement of the buffer is proposed as mitigation for proposed buffer impacts. (4) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; Response: Not applicable, the impact is permanent. (5) Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; and Response: The proposed impact of 3,022sf of stream buffer will be mitigated through the enhancement of� 3,022sf of existing degraded stream buffer. This enhancement includes weedy species removal and native plant installation as well as a split rail fence and signage. (6) Monitoring the hazard or other required mitigation and taking remedial action when necessary. Response: The mitigation a�eY wi�l be monitored for 5 years as required BrF� (b) Identification, of ail local, state, and/or federal wetland related perrnit(sf requ red for the proposal. Sharma/# 17-127 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. August 8, 2017 Page 11 Response: There are no wetland or wetland buffer impacts and as such no permits are required. (c) Documentation of fieldwork, including field data sheets, rating system forms, and baseline hydrologic data. Specifically, inclusion of data sheets of wetland and upland sample plots, and figures supporting the rating system form. Required rating form figures are referenced in comment 4 below. Response: Data sheets are attached. (e) Identification and characterization of oil wetlands and buffers on and within 225 feet of the subject property. For off -site areas with limited or no access, estimate conditions using best available information. June 19, 2017 Critical Areas Mitigation Addendum — Parcel #119600-1285' implies wetland(s) occur within 225 feet of the subject property, but characterization based on field observations or estimated using best available information is not provided. Response: No wetlands or streams are within 225' of the site. "l 4) LAI provides the fallowing comments to the wetiand rating form. Provided any updates based on the following comments, sae acknowledge that any change in the total score will maintain the classification as a Category IV wetland, and concur with that classification: A single figure is provided following the rating form in the Critical Areas Report, but is not legible. The following maps and figures are required as referenced in the rating form; i. Cowardln plant classes, il, Hydroperiods. iii. Plant cover of dense trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants. iv. Boundary of 150 ft buffer. v. 1 kilometer (km) Polygon; Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge — including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat_ vi. Screen capture of 303(d) listed craters In basin. vil. Screen capture of list of Total Maximum Daily loads (Tk4DLs) for Water Resource inventory Area (WRIA) In which unit Is found. b. Under Question H 2.0, provide calculations noted in H 2.1 and H 2.2. c, for Question H 3,0, it appears at least one priority habitat (i.e. "Riparian'") occurs within 100 meters of the site due to the stream on/adjacent to the site, and should be provided a rating value of "Mt" instead of "L" Response: All requested figures are attached to this report as well the revised rating form which maintains the Category IV rating. 1 Sharma/# 17-127 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. August 8, 2017 Page 12 5) Ba AI's site review, it appears some vegetation within the eotland and stream buffers has been cut/cleared (see attached photograph), n 1n Response: All cut vegetation appears to be within the area that will be cleared for the home anyway so no restoration would be required at th' time. �� 5) The conceptual site plan presented in the Critical Areas Report and the July 5, 2017 (Resubmitted August 29, 2017) site plan prepared by AP Consulting Engineers identify the 50-ft stream buffer, but do not show the 40-ft wetland buffer. Based on the site plan prepared by AP Consulting Engineers, it appears the proposed residence will encroach in the wetland buffer. Asa result, the wetland buffer will need to be included on project site plans and encroachment evaluated in accordance with PWRC Section 19.145.440 (Development within wetland buffers). LAi review of stream buffer impacts and mitigation sequencing provided in the Critical Areas Report Lvlll be completed following any updates based on evaluation of wetland buffer impacts/mitigation sequencing. Response: The site plan has been revised to completely avoid the 'X wetland buffer so this is not applicable under the new site plan. If you have any questions in regards to this report or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at (253) 859-0515 or at esewallna,sewallwc.com . Sincerely, Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. Ed Sewall Senior Wetlands Ecologist PWS #212 \ - -- 0 � { p�= § �§ § \ u b %.0 \ g \ ® $ % & �f E § % a_ / f�L / § \. { CL,c 2 2 / \ 'a E E0 @ « 5 2 \ 0- R 2 u 3 e £ e r Eli ■ e d i F i • �:.�.� �. -::.,c _ �� �- �• , _ �= �'• ��; .`pro �•�`-.� � �� ► �a i I_ = it,:, 0 CL t71 �ti+w- C 7 4 + Si - • - - - { del -- 2L Qp m O N ai �5 d CI t4 U Ln + "Ln"� rn � � C a a L% -. ti i ti. .w'- r cu ••� }- v._t - u Q' � 7 'r di s z r► a v a ZI v m ?4L 49 .j -75 Pacific Hwy 5 10 00 w ME iI'm'i w m m r. G c 4 Ln Ln CJ➢ IJ] I11 t� 9 �I Illllfll� im��� ��fllllfll�B g S ��Il�llfl�>s— f I I gal �Illllill s �E F gl \I rz �III�� IIII��IIIIIIII}III III IIII� IIIII� IIlll�lllll� III :Illilvlll Il�lllfllllilfl 111 6 m 16 lira vi 4 vi io e i J. L w st 9 3 a ••� 2 ti N N T m N 2 N x Ai -4 a x c Y ••I ui vi c c N T N x N T e •••1 of F. ooeo.ox o0 d m � 3 E g o a v d � 0 e S •t .h y c u E ' C O VXX L L � W M a7 t r � WO o= e d E 5 a pli a 3 3 c s����—ss N o� y u � � m m C a g Y m -0 O. � ❑ 1 (i w y N _N p OI ' ❑ C L E O }� ❑ L � a � m � Y C rY/ O_ Q 0 3 O L a � E -- hW- Vi v 8 a.,R m C Y Z a fl O O Z ❑ t � Q F 4J v 3 '" G 3 o a Z E « 1° Z 2 W , 0 N N T ry ¢ S N � eV ry M 'i '1 f S .rv-1 •-I ei x ¢ V N .-I ¢ ¢ .•1 fV O IV ¢ ¢ ti N S rl n tfi m ¢ eK � d m g � � 8 « = m 3 c v v c c o v�q=Y a � L t E°a ¢ 8 Y9�3 0oCC ryEry 9��'Q o � a •� d y c Q o 0 Z ' p233 {�y]� = d t' c m +- d,o xxsM 3F if J p n n u n n n u u u vow O �° �.�•F m w n nn b e ui Ln v m a J JJJ J J a , 2 a x x s u cJ `JLa) J E S 2 S c C a Y O Cc u. 0 aN Y nt m 1Cp � 10 > � Tqy+ C m N S 2 y 2 y Y= x y y 1I1 = y ul 00 c d ,Q 3 d c a E C •� c �F v E Eg�aoCaCy� v � E Y 7 m y Vk C ' O ai Y 16 S c Y i _ z 3 3 I Ul kj O N c cu K [ Z a a, E 'a � T ai £ 7 O N m C 'r 1. Z� q 'g N ° �' � 67 �dy y y e �� L y'C fil N C O 'b N F yy N L x L �•� UGC � Q. LN+ � O N m F rCOOto C h L v a c �+ C d Q'i O m `� C7 y p❑ y a1 V c m P. N N 'O > '� QG C7 V Y ai w RCN 5 � y m m y�� m z y u m Q `J � N° r F a�i 1 •c a M 3 .fl d omf0 3 tAp '�v�v� ^`gym ✓' N F a F fJ EI p,�Oz'd > .a y 41 ari 1Ca F� ar7 aa'B _ y a4 E u N �a7 FppL Iya G� b S 31% Q m Q) uRa n�ia��ai3� rNn OF' w O ° ° 71 ,o� i N° F ab A "F a - o�[FF;Qi c�a d 5 Q.'�"'..'G to �a .a to ,4z i arJ i i 7 N m` t W� q o$ Zsy r y'. to nn c d v c m c c W 06 c m c .4 N N c c y W Z 10 ¢ V N W C 'w y Y N CL �••• 4 W m aJ m C m 01 t v c N 'v T C O r '� pmy C alm 3 y c C a E O ti C 01 c o `� w d tu c : �° oc �• ar 2 + i° o' m c+ p? m m+ LL N °' D m a m N o 'y N N m m n 42 F i� Lm � S y C �••1 a� ��ww O' £ '•1 O W W .O � r� O �y r � N p r' � I �y � � ❑ a7 � y %' y � J y y Y C q � `o u > cc V 14 1 Q, C m W f7 x 'C a ,� rn D ❑ a+ v°i C W o O N" G06 O y a+ m a. m G Or VwN y VCO N V m >. t7 b v y p N b C N p 0 u O N 3 o a+ 5wLm •�, G F F 4 .N. asi ItsO ° � +� 'O G ` ;C F. CI a) 0 N > u° m❑ w rn o ° 3 3 ` m v °vac'w v ° > y V,� a1 p a)� �y 3 a c�d^p C • .. 41, toC C N .t" vS �•' y 3 C a/ 'd d N 7J 0 a'�i ° ON. a Cn 7 w m a �! a C F ° O O LN r ra a- .,Ca+m me m a° c m c 3 aa a J. Tm E�x00 ;7 Fca O' e e Yam +• 3 0 3 m a e y u C N c° vlu ° 0. O 'o N o 3 •� ° [� f7. C F-. C y'7 b a/ N d u� b= m— y N •^ •� �C"rVC ', ea ar7 as sl- w P.•cr r " ,••� N l vi IA 'd-I 9 I 3 ... ij .. o b Y U r " 63 3 m �, c b G C N Y � r0 M. E g'Q g � C O N # U '6 M QI d N d o o w C O v 3 N ? 4 O b 0 a y E ap 11 a Y c S �,e.= a G d ,y NN 0 0 � N SRC 11 U l 11 r, n d � 11 O �p C 9 c r n c � 'g $ � ky — 31 a # yy q c G •m o 9 � f! c $ N yyyN m L 0 11 �c P ._ Y yy C L� L ID A = N O l0 yl ti 10 N N tp N a H 11 I 11 1 DI 1„ n 11 Il a C Z b > C C R C A # d c Q ° � c b 0 � $ c a 's v d u eE W a_ o d ° N�zotd,a m 3 n m X X yp Y E a aIt x E« N E YI og�ll�i�i°�i$� y y a Y y gggga .2 e•1 N N ea rl N N F i C tt I I II M1 11 O Q C u G E b' M1 V C Q A E a � d s q Q ti L W � m a E t 5 c dm N9 Y —Y2 N s « Iri r n; N m R m a t e 9 9 1 � E 2q°1 ° a pN m 10 `a N 2 G 42 C a a~ E2 �pSN i C Es y4y"Ef��L�� �I N p N 2 F a M N .-ISO II II II II `df M .•1 O tl 4 II IS c N _I11 ° ills m ,acS tl n c a a � c 5 12 c � s3 C t q d 10 CL m .q O 3i + na� f ol 13 c m N .Y•I n a 3 qQ�a osE1 y Q .1�1. A A a ��`i L TO V E E y .•I .-I A i' A .a .•I c w n N .+ V sg J 7 7 n w N !V N fV = 2 2 2 S w N �GG u N n n o d yqV ycc � N O O 2 �6 o n � � d o m > M1 g m ky' W L� R rl a1 r� pa a1 8 v a o $ A23 . 2 NI 0 n 3- g O �2 y V y OS z a N Eslllll ��2 M I., = a a pa n n E p E c 11 It n .g pc ,a�pc c E PL N N a Epp pc_ _p _'❑ 6❑ G .-i yC � YYy c C C N e u 4 a L 6 ��E c �yv .: a�•9 o N z •� a ° E n j .. d gok, 3r3 tail �cs .a al 4 tj c.-3 E v m�E E.e 3 d$' y _3 'i �w 3 - Y u I E .t .y 3 IP S di t C ��W,. y jC N L N �'y^pn'ry• Aytl C ,9��i1�yyp, Q a •O }wx t- o yO ax �ao •obi �� �'" ° y' "' � ��� 3 �I 3 V 3o3 d 5 a � �5i�,� w �•�� �'Ggw t v S s ❑ 0!4 up c 3 1! O a ca C N _ t? Z z " �.u. Yd7 r`� ry ZZ •E m it3z o R oz s °"z o O p z z° z O Z. $ «2 Z z d b a gz > b nc a v E� °o ° 1. (Y^�I C L L Z K r Oa N Y 'K[ i t, U g II Y •i II OE E 5 " a m c $ "� Bbu •�� m E�o�uca ,' azi= °°CCd g_, v g age •_�Y ` Y W�y��EE d y pdp .. Y L C N Af Is �j C 1fl 3 R a.r a 9 ° C P N K J. �3 u�11 tip LW M a y L A.4 A C Y G F o'E.Q� IMF 3 �3 N m ❑ S ? tc"4 ¢ �avaF M. d a S 'E �p a3i o i 4 c; 0 P L• `o E 4 o E aN s G Q O L L CL CL-B 4 �+ •- � L« w y C � L G � � .d. F p1 e w d � �� C Y� S� Y 1tCp j ; Z Y 4 4 a C O C rp �G L r2 Y ti r �p C G 8 ° Cl : ni R : eJ v Y R ry ^1 v 3 6� "'I ..j r1 !V eJ fJ !J N biMu m M v� m vi Ili M Al bt u b d g n C •5 •C > m n$ d C E ° r O at C N y $ 2 Pn `'Sm Q e C, a E ro oggo Ear vN ao6 o w •Eqq o .$ .d u' ''7 n a O •� d N Vi C ^� d C 3 �_ W O 4 Dt,Y. w 3i d N i. ^' Iu d L'•� d p� � �p { ani 3 a e -ZVAw N N o m W ° 4 p v A o e cc 07Cyy aEc > ryery m vu,� pG w v= y IA M W° a° C� " .d. a`>fom q 3 edi5 ovmr' R 3 of d o ena a� S7� .e'°^ a d yl N q d m d iC v, c o Ol .Q G t; d d d 06 Q. LL oo- a e �° a th a d� s e y u o� a Yo i" w a4 •d=d � 3 Ew d`x qp y3 t 3p O Q ?+' •O w'1 a G � 9 'C �° w� � y 0F E. 4 5 - iN 'u ut p3 �3 TAR IX o at w m =. `o i,i; �o ° ° 3m 3oE �3 5� e 4 y�y Z o y� pm L>' NqC� ` .d. y EO N 3 To ❑ E mL' Z " `' Ww d a '� -p^1 d o x v 3 d Y G 4 S 0 3 m d $� 3a U= I I I I I i I I I I I I I ad a a a o a a a a Y 204 ? o ii r r p =el z N p -� 9 n 1° m z a z z z yNy� Yy� C S N m C p y �.� p 4 i p O 1 S f{I _ sic n yOc y L $ �n ":mk' 9 1. tC m C {.p°�. `u � O C rS i yC N W m r po�q C C l+Q�' �' 3 p E nN fib L z O C N 1A $ e o 4 O E c ag C, d 10 Is C N N d z z'. E g poi 5 3gg 3 q a m p '� : O 3 F a£ a E zop g 79 AN, 0 L" Technical Memorandum'E TO: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Associate Planner, City of Federal Way FROM: Steven Quarterman DATE: December 15, 2017 RE: Peer Review Subhash Sharma Property — Critical Areas Parcel 119600-1285 Federal Way, Washington 0238079.010.011 Introduction This technical memorandum provides Landau Associates' (LAI) peer review comments regarding the May 3, 2017 Critical Areas Designation — Parcel #119600-1285 (Critical Areas Report) for property located in the vicinity of 2"d Avenue SW and SW 294th Street, Federal Way, Washington.' The purpose of this peer review is to provide a professional opinion regarding applicable regulatory requirements in the City of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19.145, specifically under Article IV Wetlands, Article III Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas, and mitigation sequencing. Peer review comments regarding the Critical Areas Report include: 1) LAI wetlands staff conducted a reconnaissance of the subject property on December 5, 2017, and generally agree with the stream boundary flagged and shown in the Critical Areas Report; however, flags W-1 and A-1 should be shown connecting to the culvert to the south, and the stream alignment appears to continue east within the site north of flags W-9 and E-9. We agree with the wetland boundary flagged and shown in the Critical Areas Report. Within the flagged wetland, LAI observed dominance of hydrophytic vegetation; saturation and drainage pattern satisfying the wetland hydrology parameter; and soil profile satisfying the hydric soils parameter as a depleted matrix. LAI staff evaluated an area to the west of the stream that was observed with similar vegetated characteristics to the delineated wetland near wetland flag W-3, and noted soils did not satisfy the hydric soils parameter at that location. 2) LAI concurs with classification of the onsite stream as a Type Np (perennial non -fish habitat stream). Stream type is based on Section 19.145.260 of the FWRC, where streams are classified in accordance with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) water -typing system (Washington Administrative Code [WAC] 222-16-030). According to WAC 222-16-030, the Interim Water -Typing System established in WAC 222-16-031 is to be used until the "fish habitat water typing maps" are adopted by the state Forest Practices Board, and the DNR provides guidance' for the determination of "fish use" associated with the interim rule. The 1 Sewall Consulting Inc. Critical Areas Designation —Parcel #119600-1285. SWC Job# 17-127, rr,n, l7q Z hru z Section 13 Guidelines for Determining Fish Use for the Purposes of Typing Waters. �j u;ED LANDAU LA ASSOCIATES 130 2nd Avenue South • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • (425) 778-0907 S' ' 12 - ►�� Landau Associates DNR guidance provides stream survey protocol and alternatives for making fish use determinations. The guidance indicates: Where field surveys for determining fish use have not been done, water type is determined by applying the physical characteristics contained in WAC 222-16-031(3). The DNR, in consultation with the WDFW, DOE, and affected Indian tribes, may waive or modify these characteristics where evidence provides relative certainty that such waters do not supportfish life. While observed physical characteristics of the onsite segment of stream appear to satisfy the criteria to support fish life as referenced in WAC 222.16- 031(3), available information indicates the delineated stream cannot support fish life: The stream is not currently identified on Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) SalmonScape3 as containing anadromous fish species. t4 indintaflint tharhnnnal " ,nnnanrc o ha racidt rif titter from King rnwnv hydrologic changes in the drainage due to surrounding development. Under pre - development conditions, I do not believe that this depressional area could have concentrated enough flow to scour a channel except at or near its confluence with Puget Sound." Documentation from the City of Federal Ways indicating the longitudinal gradient of the original surface channel in the area between Puget Sound adjacent bluff exceeded slope requirements for the presumption of fish -use. Y SJ4uIIIentatlVn, ,'3` the upStr earn portion of the stream as beina an intermittent stream less than one foot wide.' As a result, the onsite stream does not have a fish passable connection to Puget Sound, and presumably does not contain re a is siri'rF� r'�ibutaiies ai n sF�er open water areas exist as a population source for resident species. 3) The Critical Areas Report does not satisfy all of the evaluation criteria provided in FWRC 19.145.410(2). A subsequent report will be required by the city to include the following items referenced in FWRC 19.145.410(2): (a) Critical area report information identified in FWRC 19.145.080, specifically items: (e) Photographs of the site and critical areas; (g) A description of efforts made to apply mitigation sequencing pursuant to FWRC 19. 145.130 to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to critical areas; The Critical Areas Report does not provide discussion of impact avoidan_c nd minimization. Based on I.AI understanding o t e project, impact avoidance is achieved o�rthe stream and wetland identified in the Critical Areas Report and discussion of - minimization of buffer impacts is not provided, 3 WDFW. 2017.5almonscape. 4 King County Surface Water Management Division. 1990. Stream Identification at intersec on of 292nd Street and Second Avenue. Ginao Lucchetti to Ms. Corey Smith, City of Federal Way. October 8. 5 City of Federal Way. 2013. Stream Reclass Request —Stream "R" (2nd Ave. SW/SW 292nd Vic.). William Appleton to Patrick f]o4erty. 6 Soupciview Consultants. 2013. Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan, Kim Residence. June. Sharma Property Critical Areas Peer Review December 15, 2017 Landau Associates (b) Identification of all local, state, and/or federal wetland related permit(s) required for the proposal. (c) Documentation of fieldwork, including field data sheets, rating system forms, and baseline hydrologic data. Specifically, inclusion of data sheets of wetland and upland sample plots, and figures supporting the rating system form. Required rating form figures are referenced in comment 4 below. (d) Description of the methodologies used to conduct the wetland delineations, rating system forms, or impact analyses, including references. The Critical Areas Report does not provide description of methodology for impact analyses. (e) Identification and characterization of all wetlands and buffers on and within 225 feet of the subject property. For off -site areas with limited or no access, estimate conditions using best available information. June 19, 2017 Critical Areas Mitigation Addendum - Parcel #119600-1285' implies wetland(s) occur within 225 feet of the subject property, but characterization based on field observations or estimated using best available information is not prided. If applicable for wetlands within 225 feet of the subject property: (f) Provide the following for each wetland identified on a d/or ithin 225 feet of the subject property. Acreage estimates, classifications,'Wdd ratings shall be based on entire wetland complexes, not only the portion present on the subject property: (i) Wetland rating and score for each function; (ii) Required buffers, (iii) Hydrogeomorphic classification; (iv) Wetland acreage, (v) Cowardin classification of vegetation communities; (vi) Habitat elements; (vii) Soil conditions based on site assessment and/or soil survey information; and (viii) To the extent possible, hydrologic information such as location and condition of inlet/outlets, estimated water depths within the wetland, and estimated hydroperiod patterns based on visual cues (e.g., algal mats, drift lines, and flood debris). 7 Sewall Consulting Inc. Critical Areas Mitigation Addendum —Parcel #119600-1285. SWC Job# 17-127. June 19. Sharma Property Critical Areas Peer Review 3 December 15, 2017 Landau Associates 4) LAI provides the following comments to the wetland rating form. Provided any updates based on the following comments, we acknowledge that any change in the total score will maintain the classification as a Category IV wetland, and concur with that classification: A single figure is provided following the rating form in the Critical Areas Report, but is not legible. The following maps and figures are required as referenced in the rating form: i. Cowardin plant classes. ii. Hydroperiods. iii. Plant cover of dense trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants. iv. Boundary of 150 ft buffer. v. 1 kilometer (km) Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge — including -polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat. Screen capture of 303(d) listed waters in basin. vii. Screen capture of list of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for Water Resource Inventory -Area (WRIA) in -which -unit is found: -- b. Under Question H 2.0, provide calculations noted in H 2.1 and H 2.2. c. For Question-H-3.0,-it-appears at -least one-priority-habitat-(i.e. ""Riparian"") occurs within 100 meters of the site due to the stream on/adjacent to the site, and should be provided a rating value of "M" instead of "L". - 5) Based on LAI's site -review, it appears -some vegetation within the -existing wetland -and -stream buffers has been cut/cleared (see attached photograph). 6) The conceptual site plan presented in the Critical Areas Report and the July 5, 2017 (Resubmitted August 29, 2017) site plan prepared by AP Consulting Engineers identify the 50-ft stream buffer, but do not show the 40-ftwetlan_buer. Based on the site plan prepared by AP Consulting Engineers, it appears the proposed residence will encroach in the wetland buffer. As a result, the wetland buffer will need to be included on project site plans and encroachment evaluated in accordance with FWRC Section 19.145.440 (Development within wetland buffers). LAI review of stream buffer impacts and mitigation sequencing provided in the Critical Areas Report will be completed following any updates based on evaluation of wetland buffer impacts/mitigation sequencing. This technical memorandum has been prepared for use by the City of Federal Way in evaluating the adequacy of -the -Critical Areas -Report-for-King County Parcel 1-19600-1285. The -focus of this review was the wetland and stream delineation. The purpose of the review was to assess the adequacy of the submitted documents for compliance with City requirements as promulgated in FWRC Title 19 and conformance with conventionally accepted wetland/waterway delineation practices. No other party is entitled to rely on the information, conclusions, and recommendations included in this document without the express written consent of Landau Associates. Further, the reuse of information, conclusions, and recommendations provided herein for extensions of the project or for any other Sharma Property Critical Areas Peer Review December 15, 2017 Landau Associates project, without review and authorization by Landau Associates, shall be at the user's sole risk. Landau Associates warrants that within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been provided in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions as this project. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City. Please contact us if you have any questions or if we may be of further service. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. Steven J. Quartzrman Senior Associate Ecologist SJQ/tam/jrc P:\238\079\R\Wetland Peer Review\Sharma Critical Areas- Wetland Peer Review.doa Attachment: Figure 1-1: Vegetation within Existing Wetland and Stream Buffers Sharma Property Critical Areas Peer Review 5 December 15, 2017 12/11/17 P:1 JUIU/HVt WeUena rear mmem-arma �ne[a�'+e�a �'r�pem roar rvnm �ax_niieeca Subhash Sharma Property Vegetation within Existing Wetland Figure LANDAU Federal Way, Washington and Stream Buffers14 1-1 Assoc;ATES Technical Memorandum TO: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Associate Planner, City of Federal Way FROM: Steven Quarterman DATE: March 13, 2018 RE: Peer Review — Resubmittal No. 1 Subhash Sharma Property — Critical Areas Parcel 119600-1285 Federal Way, Washington 0238079.010.011 Introduction This technical memorandum provides Landau Associates' (LAI) peer review comments on the applicant resubmittal in response to comments provided by LAI in the technical memorandum addressed to you dated December 15, 2017.1 The following provides review comments on the February 7, 2018 Critical Areas Mitigation Addendum — Parcel #119600-1285 (Critical Areas Report Addendum) ; Site Plan, Planting Plan, Notes, & Details (Site Plan); Tree Retention and Landscape Plan L2 of 2 (Landscape Plan); and the conceptual mitigation discussion provided in the May 3, 2017 Critical Areas Designation — Parcel #119600-1285 (Critical Areas Report) 3 for property located in the vicinity of 2"d Avenue SW and SW 2941h Street, Federal Way, Washington. The purpose of this peer review is to provide a professional opinion regarding applicable regulatory requirements in the City of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19.145, specifically under Article IV Wetlands, Article III Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas, and mitigation sequencing. Cumulatively, the Critical Areas Report and Critical Areas Report Addendum satisfy the City's reporting requirements, with specific exceptions identified below. It is noted that the applicant avoids impacting the onsite wetland and its buffer, and onsite stream. Peer review comments include: 1. A Hydroperiod figure is required as referenced in the wetland rating form. It is noted that the onsite wetland is identified in the rating form as being "Saturated only" and "Permanent flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland." An untitled figure in the Critical Areas Report, following the references section, identifies the wetland and adjacent stream, and meets the City's regulatory requirements for a hydroperiod figure. 1 Landau Associates. 2017. Technical Memorandum re: Peer Review Subhash Sharma Property — Critical Areas Parcel 11960-1285. December 17. Z Sewall Consulting Inc. Critical Areas Mitigation Addendum — Parcel #11960-1285. SWC Job# 17-127. 3 Sewall Consulting Inc. Critical Areas Designation —Parcel #119600-1285. SWC Job# 17-127. 14 LANDAU ASSOCIATES 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, Washington 98020 (425) 778-0907 Landau Associates 2. The total area of onsite buffer enhancement and number of plantings cannot be confirmed based on review of submitted documents. FWRC 19.145.330(2) identifies that "Stream buffer intrusions may be permitted with a buffer enhancement plan. The applicant shall demonstrate that the remaining and enhanced reduced buffer will function at an equivalent or higher level than the standard buffer." The area of enhancement in the Critical Areas Report Addendum is identified to 3,022 square feet of buffer. The Site Plan identifies 3,022 square feet of enhancement (i.e. control noxious weeds and install native plants) occurring in an area of existing stream buffer south, north, and east of the proposed house, and an area of added buffer extending beyond the existing stream buffer south of the proposed house. The Site Plan includes a plant schedule identifying installation of 67 plants, but Table 1— Goals/Objectives, Monitoring Schedule, & Performance Standards on the Site Plan identifies installation of 126 native plantings in 5,353 square -feet of on -site -buffer. The Landscape Plan identifies 126 plantings to be installed in remaining onsite stream buffer, wetland buffer, and wetland, but omits plantings in area of adders buffer depicted on the Site Plan south of the proposed house. The applicant should provide the following information: a. The square foot area of buffer enhancements combined between the Site Plan and 1--.„1J„_2pe n�la,; which shall ornn t the area of onsite wetland. b. Installation of plantings in the,area of added buffer south of the proposed house. c. Updated planting schedule identifying total number of plantings to be installed in the --------r-emaining-ons-ite-buffer and -added-buffer3outh-of-the-propo-se_d-house. - 3. The Landscape Plan includes upland species, namely red elderberry (Sambutus racemoso) 1 ,'il, rrd Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis), to be ' e area of the onsite wetland aPi nting� iin the wetland should either be removed or replaced with hydrophytic species `-� �id evaluated as potential wetland enhancements. 4. In accordance with FWRC 19.145.330(2), evaluation of existing stormwater retention functions and erosion protection functions of the stream buffer and effects of the proposed modifications on those functions is required. Response to stormwater retention capabilities provided in the Critical Areas Report focuses on the stream as opposed to the stream buffer, and erosion protection control response focuses on the erosion control plan to be irfiplernented during construction (Le. does ;lot address existing conditions or effects of the completed project on this function.). While not explicitly summarized in the Critical Areas Report or Critical Areas Report Addendum, the enhancement plan, provided that the extent of enhancements include the - --lbfwpovide amix-ofnativespeces and fy-pes (i.e- .remaining bufferand additionaue shrubs and trees) that will: ■ Increase density of vegetation, which will function to slow runoff, thereby increasing stormwater retention functions, and also support water quality functions through filtration of runoff. • Increase erosion protection through the establishment of vegetation at densities greater than existing conditions, thereby reducing the area of exposed soil potentially subject to erosion. Sharma Property Critical Areas Peer Review March 13, 2018 Landau Associates This technical memorandum has been prepared for use by the City of Federal Way in evaluating the adequacy of the Critical Areas Report and Critical Areas Report Addendum for King County Parcel 119600-1285. The focus of this review was the wetland and stream mitigation sequencing. The purpose of the review was to assess the adequacy of the submitted documents for compliance with City requirements as promulgated in FWRC Title 19 and conformance with conventionally accepted wetland/waterway mitigation practices in place at the time this technical memorandum was prepared. No other party is entitled to rely on the information, conclusions, and recommendations included in this document without the express written consent of Landau Associates. Further, the reuse of information, conclusions, and recommendations provided herein for extensions of the project or for any other project, without review and authorization by Landau Associates, shall be at the user's sole risk. Landau Associates warrants that within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been provided in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions as this project. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City. Please contact us if you have any questions or if we may be of further service. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. Steven J. Quarterman Senior Associate Ecologist SJ Q/BAS/ta m \\edmdataol\projects\238\079\R\Wetland Peer Review\Wetland Peer Review_Resubmittal l\Sharma Critical Areas- Wetland Peer ReviewResubl.dou Sharma Property Critical Areas Peer Review 3 March 13, 2018 CITY OF L Federal Way Centered son opportunity November 29, 2018 Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma 317 SW 295�' Place Federal Way, WA 98023 sharmarco ahoo.cnm CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www, 0yoffederalway. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor FILE Re: File #18-104279-00-SF (17-102034-00-UP); PLANNING REVIEW/APPROVAL CONDITIONS Sharma Residence, 120 SW 2941h Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Sharma: The Planning Division has completed their review of the September 13, 2018, building permit submittal. The following comments and conditions of approval shall be satisfied prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, or as otherwise noted. TECHNICAL COMMENTS 1. Remove the grass-crete depicted in the public right-of-way. Grass-crete may be installed on private property only. Please see the approved building plans as redlined (site copy). 2. No land disturbance or development shall occur within the Category IV wetland buffer. The southeast corner of the critical area fencing appears to abut this wetland buffer. BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL CONDITIONS PrioA'art of Construction: a. The applicant shall install a berm, curb, or other physical barrier during construction to prevent direct runoff and erosion from any disturbed area onto or into a critical area. If necessary, the applicant shall install a berm, curb, or other physical barrier following completion of development of the subject property to prevent direct runoff and erosion from any disturbed area onto or into a critical area. Please schedule a pre -construction inspection with the project planner. b. Critical Area Signs — Development proposals approved by the city shall require that the boundary between a critical area buffer and contiguous land shall be identified with permanent signs. A minimum of two signs shall be installed on this proposal. Or in this case, to the extent of the approved stream buffer intrusion. Doc I D 78280 18-104279-00-SF Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma Page 2 of 2 November 29, 2018 Prior to Cerlificate of Occupancy: a. A five-year performance and monitoring bond must be established for this project's mitigation plan pursuant to FWRC 19,145.100. Please contact the project planner for additional information on bond creation. The financi4l-,guarantees are necessary to ensure that the mitigation plan is fully implemented. Financial guarantees ens,,uring the fulfillment of the monitoring program, and any contingency measures, shall be posted in accordance with FWRC 19.25. b. The applicant shall install a permanent split rail fence (critical area fencing) as depicted on the building plan set. The fencing shall exist in perpetuity to avoid further encroachment into the stream buffer. c. The applicant shall record a critical area notice on the title. The site plan approved with the Process III stream buffer decision shall be attached to the notice on the title depicting all critical areas, critical area buffers, mitigation areas, and authorized critical area intrusions. d. Stream buffer enhancement plantings shall be subject to a final inspection. To schedule a final planning inspection, please contact me, Leila Willoughby -Oakes, as noted below. CLOSING The Planning Division review has concluded. Should you have any questions about this letter, please contact me at leila.willoughby-oakes &cityoffederalway com, or 253-835-2644. Sincerely, Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner c: Andrew Norton, Building Inspector Ann Dower, Development Services 18-104279-00-SF Doc. I.D. 78280 I MY" slewaff we#fana _ consuf#Iing, Inc. PoBoxM Pl orie:253&99-CM5 Fall Gty, WA %M4 June 19, 2017 AUG 2 9 l I!`i / CfTY OF FEDERAL Y:-'I.Y Subhash Sharma COMMUNr Y DEVELOPMENT 317 SW 295th Place Federal Way, Washington 98023 RE: Critical Areas Mitigation Addendum- Parcel # 119600-1285 SWC Job # 17-127 Dear Sharma, This report is in response to the June 13, 2017 letter to you from Leila Willoughby -Oakes of the City of Federal Way Planning Department. Specifically she requested the following points which are addressed below; • SIwriu/ Malies on(] Aikiilkwal lnfarmolarw (three ror*r reepdrerl) — I'rnvide a critical areas r "I with sttpplemental informatiou including a wnesart fia i r cn rnllrlan rursuartt trr FFWRC: 19.1453330(Z((a)-(e). i'he enhance rent shall he nwinitcned, ai a strearn buffer i►ttrusi4m may be permitted with said plan. but must dentonstrate that the remainifT and enhanced reduced buffer will fanction at an equivalsont or higher level than the standard regulated stream buffer. As such, your propasal is sub' Iezt to tencrat performance and maintenance bonds per FWRC. 19,145.100 for a duration accepted by the city's third part) consultant Landau Associates. Response: As requested, a Stream Buffer Enhancement Plan is attached detailing how we will enhance the reduced buffer. Currently the buffer is a deciduous forested area that has been impacted by trash and debris-al"O"FR„ . well as invasive species (giant knotweed and Himalayan blackberrfl, and as such, its functions have been impacted for habitat as well as water s pe quality. The proposal includes removal of trash and invasive species, as �� well as an under planting of the existing alder forest to increase species ' richness and complexity, as well as enhance its ability to provide habitat for the few human tolerant species using this area. Maintenance and monitoring are included on the plan. ■ C died .4rcrr &,16 vks —All plan -sets shall depict a 5-N. setback from the edge (Wthe stream, Welland andkV ecologically bazardous arim buffcrs, unless otherwise approved. Response: As requested a 5' setback is shown from the edge of the buffers to the home, driveway etc. I Sharma/#]7-127 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. June 19, 2017 Page-2 • Critical Areas Signs -- Development proposals approved by the city shall teVoire that the boundary between a critical area buffer and contiguous land shall be identified with permanent signatte. Please depict the signagc type as an inset on the plans. Signs must be posred at an interval of one per lot - Response: As requested critical area signage has been provided to be installed permanently along the proposed split rail fence at the edge of the buffer. Permaautwr l-enring Permanent fencing shall be required at the c"tteredge of the critical area butler as a buffer reduction is employed as part of this proposal and as the fencing shall pmwz the values and functions of the existing stream. preventing further unpermitted encroachments (F WKC 19.145.1110 3(b) and (d)• Response: As requested a split rail fence is depicted on the plan at the edge of the buffer. • Weela nd — The applicant shall depict the small slope type scrub shrub wetland and the extents of the pro. posed wvtland butler locuted tdung the southur5t corner of the situ rm the east site of the stream, Response: As requested the small scrub -shrub wetland along the east side of the site is depicted on the enhancement plan. ( L%-ita It R'tlu�els -- "t'lu< applic aru', (yiolctgitit shin[ rvaluale if welhutds exist on or within 225 fact of'thr subject property. If any wetlands exist within 22541 please chow, rate. a timate acreage and score: the welland -showing any Ixtffers on the plans (FWRC 19.14a.410 ()}. Response: As stated on Page 1 in the Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc, May 3, 2017 Critical Areas Report, we, reviewed the site and all areas within 225' of the site. There are no wetlands with buffers that would encroach onto the site from off -site wetlands as what wetlands are present in the area are separated from the site by existing developed areas. If you have any questions in regards to this report or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at (253) 859-0515 or at esewal -sewallwc.com . Sincerely, Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. Ed Sewall Senior Wetlands Ecologist PWS #212 Technical Memorandum TO: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Associate Planner, City of Federal Wa FROM: Steven Quarterman DATE: December 15, 2017 RE: Peer Review Subhash Sharma Property — Critical Areas Parcel 119600-1285 Federal Way, Washington 0238079.010.011 Introduction This technical memorandum provides Landau Associates' (LAI) peer review comments regarding the May 3, 2017 Critical Areas Designation — Parcel #119600-1285 (Critical Areas Report) for property located in the vicinity of 2"d Avenue SW and SW 294th Street, Federal Way, Washington.' The purpose of this peer review is to provide a professional opinion regarding applicable regulatory requirements in the City of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19.145, specifically under Article IV Wetlands, Article III Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas, and mitigation sequencing. Peer review comments regarding the Critical Areas Report include: 1) LAI Wetlands staff conducted a reconnaissance of the subject property on December 5, 2017, and generally agree with the stream boundary flagged and shown in the Critical Areas Report; however, flags W-1 and A-1 should be shown connecting to the culvert to the south, and the stream alignment appears to continue east within the site north of flags W-9 and E-9. We agree with the wetland boundary flagged and shown in the Critical Areas Report. Within the flagged wetland, LAI observed dominance of hydrophytic vegetation; saturation and drainage pattern satisfying the wetland hydrology parameter; and soil profile satisfying the hydric soils parameter as a depleted matrix. LAI staff evaluated an area to the west of the stream that was observed with similar vegetated characteristics to the delineated wetland near wetland flag W-3, and noted soils did not satisfy the hydric soils parameter at that location. 2) LAI concurs with classification of the onsite stream as a Type Np (perennial non -fish habitat stream). Stream type is based on Section 19.145.260 of the FWRC, where streams are classified in accordance with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) water -typing system (Washington Administrative Code [WAC] 222-16-030). According to WAC 222-16-030, the Interim Water -Typing System established in WAC 222-16-031 is to be used until the "fish habitat water typing maps" are adopted by the state Forest Practices Board, and the DNR provides guidance' for the determination of "fish use" associated with the interim rule. The 1 Sewall Consulting Inc. Critical Areas Designation — Parcel #119600-1285. SWC Job# 17-127- j1.�^ 711n� �� D 2 Section 13 Guidelines for Determining Fish Use for the Purposes of Typing Waters. F71 LANDAU ' ASSOCIATES 130 2nd Avenue South - Edmonds, Washington 98020 - (425) 778-0907 Landau Associates DNR guidance provides stream survey protocol and alternatives for making fish use determinations. The guidance indicates: Where field surveys for determining fish use have not been done, water type is determined by applying the physical characteristics contained in WAC 222-16-031(3). The DNR, in consultation with the WDFW, DOE, and affected Indian tribes, may waive or modify these characteristics where evidence provides relative certainty that such waters do not support fish life. While observed physical characteristics of the onsite segment of stream appear to satisfy the criteria to support fish life as referenced in WAC 222.16- 031(3), available information indicates the delineated stream cannot support fish life: ■ The stream is not currently identified on Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) SalmonScape3 as containing anadromous fish species. ■ Letter from King County4 indicates that the channel "...appears to be result of hydrologic changes in the drainage due to surrounding development. Under pre - development conditions, I do not believe that this depressional area could have concentrated enough flow to scour a channel except at or near its confluence with Puget Sound." • Documentation from the City of Federal Ways indicating the longitudinal gradient of the original surface channel in the area between Puget Sound adjacent bluff exceeded slope requirements for the presumption of fish use. • Documentation of the upstream portion of the stream as being an intermittent stream less than one foot wide.' As a result, the onsite stream does not have a fish passable connection to Puget Sound, and presumably does not contain resident fish since no't"ributariet or bther open water areas exist as a population source for resident species. 3) The Critical Areas Report does not satisfy all of the evaluation criteria provided in FWRC 19.145.410(2). A subsequent report will be required by the city to include the following items referenced in FWRC 19.145.410(2): (a) Critical area report information identified in FWRC 19.145.080, specifically items: (e) Photographs of the site and critical areas; (g) A description of efforts made to apply mitigation sequencing pursuant to FWRC 19.145.130 to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to critical areas; The Critical Areas Report does not provide discussion of impact avoidance and minimization,_ Based on LAI understanding of t_ e�project, impact avoidance is achieved for the stream and wetland identified_ in the Critical Areas Report, and discussion of minimization of buffer impacts is not provided. "' - --� 3 WDFW. 2017. SalmonScape.w King County Surface Water Management Division. 1990. Stream Identification at Intersedtian of 292nd Street and Second Avenue. Ginao Lucchetti to Ms. Corey Smith, City of Federal Way. October 8. 5 City of Federal Way. 2013. Stream Reclass Request —Stream "R" (2nd Ave. SW/SW 292nd Vic.). William Appleton to Patrick Doherty. 6 Soundview Consu€[ants. 2013. Habitat Assessment Report and Stream Restoration Plan, Kim Residence. June - Sharma Property Critical Areas Peer Review 2 December 15, 2017 Landau Associates (b) Identification of all local, state, and/or federal wetland related permit(s) required for the proposal. (c) Documentation of fieldwork, including field data sheets, rating system forms, and baseline hydrologic data. Specifically, inclusion of data sheets of wetland and upland sample plots, and figures supporting the rating system form. Required rating form figures are referenced in comment 4 below. (d) Description of the methodologies used to conduct the wetland delineations, rating system forms, or impact analyses, including references. The Critical Areas Report does not provide description of methodology for impact analyses. (e) Identification and characterization of all wetlands and buffers on and within 225 feet of the subject property. For off -site areas with limited or no access, estimate conditions using best available information. June 19, 2017 Critical Areas Mitigation Addendum — Parcel #119600-1285' implies wetland(s) occur within 225 feet of the subject property, but characterization based on field observations or estimated using best available information is not provided. If applicable for wetlands within 225 feet of the subject property: (f) Provide the following for each wetland identified on a d/ar ithin 225 feet of the subject property. Acreage estimates, classifications, d ratings shall be based on entire wetland complexes, not only the portion present on the subject property: (i) Wetland rating and score for each function, (ii) Required buffers; (iii) Hydrogeomorphic classification; (iv) Wetland acreage; (v) Cowardin classification of vegetation communities; (vi) Habitat elements; (vii) Soil conditions based on site assessment and/or soil survey information; and (viii) To the extent possible, hydrologic information such as location and condition of inlet/outlets, estimated water depths within the wetland, and estimated hydroperiod patterns based on visual cues (e.g., algal mats, drift lines, and flood debris). 7 Sewall Consulting Inc. Critical Areas Mitigation Addendum —Parcel #119600-1285. SWC Job# 17-127. June 19. Sharma Property Critical Areas Peer Review December 15, 2017 Landau Associates 4) LAI provides the following comments to the wetland rating form. Provided any updates based on the following comments, we acknowledge that any change in the total score will maintain the classification as a Category IV wetland, and concur with that classification: a. A single figure is provided following the rating form in the Critical Areas Report, but is not legible. The following maps and figures are required as referenced in the rating form: i. Cowardin plant classes. ii. Hydroperiods. iii. Plant cover of dense trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants. iv. Boundary of 150 ft buffer. v. 1 kilometer (km) Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge — including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat. vi. Screen capture of 303(d) listed waters in basin. vii. Screen capture of list of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) in which unit is found. b. Under Question H 2.0, provide calculations noted in H 2.1 and H 2.2. c. For Question H 3.0, it appears at least one priority habitat (i.e. "Riparian") occurs within 100 meters of the site due to the stream on/adjacent to the site, and should be provided a rating value of "M" instead of "L". 5) Based on LAI's site review, it appears some vegetation within the existing wetland and stream buffers has been cut/cleared (see attached photograph). 6) The conceptual site plan presented in the Critical Areas Report and the July 5, 2017 (Resubmitted August 29, 2017) site plan prepared by AP Consulting Engineers identify the 50-ft stream buffer, but do not show the 40-ft_wetland buffer. Based on the site plan prepared by AP Consulting Engineers, it appears the proposed residence will encroach in the wetland buffer. As a result, the wetland buffer will need to be included on project site plans and encroachment evaluated in accordance with FWRC Section 19.145.440 (Development within wetland buffers). LAI review of stream buffer impacts and mitigation sequencing provided in the Critical Areas Report will be completed following any updates based on evaluation of wetland buffer impacts/mitigation sequencing. This technical memorandum has been prepared for use by the City of Federal Way in evaluating the adequacy of the Critical Areas Report for King County Parcel 119600-1285. The focus of this review was the wetland and stream delineation. The purpose of the review was to assess the adequacy of the submitted documents for compliance with City requirements as promulgated in FWRC Title 19 and conformance with conventionally accepted wetland/waterway delineation practices. No other party is entitled to rely on the information, conclusions, and recommendations included in this document without the express written consent of Landau Associates. Further, the reuse of information, conclusions, and recommendations provided herein for extensions of the project or for any other Sharma Property Critical Areas Peer Review 4 December 15, 2017 ti Landau Associates project, without review and authorization by Landau Associates, shall be at the user's sole risk. Landau Associates warrants that within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been provided in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions as this project. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City. Please contact us if you have any questions or if we may be of further service. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. Steven 1. Qu rterman Senior Associate Ecologist S1Q/tam/jrc P:\238\079\R\Wetland Peer Review\Sharma Critical Areas - Wetland Peer Review.docx Attachment: Figure 1-1: Vegetation within Existing Wetland and Stream Buffers Sharma Property Critical Areas Peer Review December 15, 2017 Subhash Sharma Property Vegetation within Existing Wetland Figure 14 LANDAU Federal Way, Washington and Stream Buffers 1_1 ASSOCIATES I O _ L —11'4 — CRITICAL AREA FEivUTILITY CONFLICT NOTE: GE - a MATCH EXG GRADE AND SIGNAGE ALONG THE ccBASIC DISPERSION TRENCH AND VEGETATED ALONG EXG ROPOSED BUFFER AREA FLOWPATH PER FIGURE C.2.4.B OF THE 2016 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING z cri KCSWDM (ACCOMMODATES 700 SF OF ROOF co AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING }' PAVEMENT EDGE �;; THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, a ' >> 100.00, SURFACE) +3�:32 gyp ; UTILITIES, WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT, BY H a Lu Q `=1 i.. 25.0 \ POTHOLING THE UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL N �U�` 1os, T 9- J I 9�2� / " -\ AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS � ? X W J w 112.sa TM 1 u�-g / \ SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE @ 1-800-424-5555 m�- 1 way A?aP i.4b1 10.1°la E` 9 \ AND THEN POTHOLING ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AT �I W j Q IFW:ASPHAL�, :: 9 9 9 I ) y LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY Z LU a w < ©NV II1t0W iasss,Top i I _ IDiNT OF .. T /I VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF �{ _ C NNECTION FOR. ' TYPE NP SAID UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE NOT H� Z M Q C� NEW GRAS�CRETE 2 .O` q L ROOF W—e 1 STREAM q' D AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF r DM(ON�SITE) o J108.50TC�E 1 r�0 POUTS . ►' E 8 GUARANTEE ULD OCCUR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL W w Lu --J f 112.50 TOP EXG TREES CONFLICTS SHO �,, I• RETAINING WALL 110.03co (T'P) CONSULT AP CONSULTING ENGINEERS PLLC TO RESOLVE J _-- j in BY OTHERS wx0 �{ FOR TRAFFIC LOADINGS 0 1� r NEW I �15 ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH r r _ U N C� w RESIDENCE 1 i. - CONSTRUCTION• v w Q \ (FOOTPRINT I 1 r-. _ . _ _ : o c PROJECT SUMMARY. 1500 SF) N —Cfl -118 PROPOSED GRASSCRETE Op ;; .� y _ ZONING: IRS 9.6 CN CONCRETE I nCN LLj -WALKWAY(QN-SITE) I IL9. ° \ W-6 / MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 50% I I r MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK: 10, Nt 1 u5 w Q �f . NEW ASPI�ALT 1NA E$WAY.: � :' " �, � I � , 7 '� � 1 MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK: 5 � Q �... Q v� r' MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK: 5' + S� N ! , j r yx;.l U j o�p NEW SEW R t ` �`.... S / LOT SIZE: 17,000 SF SERVICE LI PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 3,187 SF 11100 1153 (18.7%) n0. ro �120 m 10.0 BSA 4. 74.0 BSB... , / PROJECT APPLICANT: LEGEND: Q MUMTER + \ 1 fti . / A-1 ohet MR. SUBHASH C SHARMA b SEE LINE '�� E"' W"-a.. q_ ;y; • A�7 SITE SLOPES> 15/o N �cn I 16:00 25.196 Pf20POS D" 317 SW 295TH PLACE '�� SPLASH :B 4EK �- .. . ll 1i IEVy 5 FOOT ASPHALT l - , .. w ; w' w FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 EXISTING ASPHALT ACCOII+IMd ROES `� Z PAVE M T ALONG\THE \ i 1 t = ( �� E ? I" o 974SFOFRijOF) `� 4A-4 w�Y . LEGAL DESCRIPTION. E. p V FRONTA E PER CO W STD \ 1' 1 L L �: �W f L �s co t `4 W DTL 3-2W 1 1 :` i. q a �� O.08 TREAM BUFFER r _� .-'�, �, �, LOTS 29,30,31 AND 32, BLOCK 15, BUENNA ADDITION, �{v o -1j I ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED INcl) } 1 or NEW �40.0' WEfiLAHID BtiFFfxR -' -I w VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 29, RECORS OF KING 1 BUFFER _ TOGETHER WITH THE 0 } AREA q 6 COUNTY, WASHINGTON, Hb -L_ EXG0 - 5 i NORTH 40 FEET OF SOUTHWEST 294TH STREET, AS 43211 `4 — IOHP-T— OHP i aLccK AFL N—a _ / , �o �� U �' �- .{p I 'r VACATED BY DECREE ENTERED IN KING COUNTY m a 1R �OHP — SUPERIOS COURT CAUSE N0.669986. `� jONAL AUG 40.0'ROW a, \ a� i EXG WATER MAIN (REO w CATEGORY NOTE: ry 40 FOOT INGRESSIV BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN IS ONLY FOR � UN E ram`_ EGRESS, UTILITIES EggMT �... V��` ,% WETLAND REFERENCE. PLEASE CONSULT THE BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN REPORT ' �. " PREPARED BY SEWALL WETLAND CONSULTING, INC, DATE w .�_ _ �- 1 ��� - 07/05117 W tis�,. z, —= ~ ��� �� = - , ,r -r-= PERMIT N0.17-102125-00-UP DRAWN AS Lu z CD AEP APFROVELYPCHECKED cn o w r �--, , w cUL►ER ~ CD PLANNING EXG 50' \ IE=109: JOB NO. 2017034 n a_BUFFER 2�, Ivc City..of. Federal Way 1 N 1 -- SHEET NO. ..- SSMH, Rl!M--124 SITE PLAN APPRe$6jt o --oo— �rID CH �I INL:I_ EXG ACCESS PRIVATE 1 �20— — — lid EASEMENT — - DAT Yate s�,,•�F-r-a-�irk,�� �u�j th 'e,,,,, bw1dM� 1 R� I \ CONSTRUCTION 'ENTRANCE ER11C3 I yo 0 1o00 11-/0 10000�0 r rn n C7,00 7 -O_O- j # _ EXG TREES TO j -BE REMOVED (TYP) 4 � I 1 IL 7.._L__I.._� EXG�REES T6 �E RE'N�OVED (TY EXG TREES TO EXG TREES TO BE REMOVED REMAIN (TYP) wr (T2p) 100.00'. w ^w 10�w 1fl�fi)��g"EXG-7RE�5 TQ BF�l�,•; LI � • REMOVED (TYPE ' 'o� ` /I ion '90 I EX6 TREE j E.� . BE�REMO D ;t �,1W . \ 31 \ / 1 Ex ao T'UU I \ r EXG" REE TO �. r' r °: � = l r \ WE LAND BUFFER' � r FILTER FABf�IC BE REMOVED .>� •J . . �. FENCE PER 21�3 i--- (TYP) 1.. i r.;, a-_.:-110 LIMIT OF Gf�EARING � 121 SQfT (0.141C) o (n N CO o \ OH� �" \ \ 1 — IOHP,--I -� ,i EXG 50' STR - `r I— — rs �. r , x :.1j. y ;�, .W-3, EXGC0 5 , 0HP - BLOCX\WALL w- E-z E -t1' �j . 1�` I NOTE: AREA OF CLEARANCE MUST BE a LESS THAN ONE ACRE OR ELSE A CONSTRUCTION PERMIT WILL BE P-4-,-, REQUIRED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, �WZ NOTE: BEFORE REMOVING THE EXISTING TREES ON -SITE PLEASE REVIEW THE � r � � W F�-�l LU TREE RETENTION PLAN PREPARED CLASSIC NURSERY & LANDSCAPE CO., INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL IZ 0�_l CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: U W 5 1. BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY, A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING MUST BE HELD BETWEEN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, THE APPLICANT AND APPLICANT'S CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATIVE, 2, FLAG CLEARING LIMITS. 3, INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 4. INSTALL FILTER FABRIC FENCE AS INDICATED ON PLAN. 5, INSTALL OFFSITE CATCH BASIN PROTECTION. 6. CLEAR AND GRUB AREAS OF THE SITE TO BE ROUGH GRADED OR FILLED. 7. ROUGH GRADE SITE AND INSTALL STORM CONVEYANCE SYSTEM AND RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITIES. PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION WHERE INDICATED. 6. INSTALL REMAINING UTILITIES AND BUILDING. 9. FINISH GRADE SITE AND CONSTRUCT ASPHALT PARKING AREAS AND ACCESS DRIVES, 10. COMPLETE SITE STABILIZATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS. 11. CLEAN STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM, ON AND OFF SITE, OF ALL SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS, 12. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES WHEN SITE IS COMPLETELY STABILIZED i= cu d CD ua C Q ca L E A� P'oewAs�r*4 43211 --;b` ISTE �+V IONX,, l PERMIT NO.17-102125-00-UP I APPROVED DATE Lu co CU w W w � O m a w w W a DATE 07/05/2017 DRAWN AS CHECKED AEP JOB NO, 2017034 SHEET NO. C2 RRI a 0 W U- A w z w 0 z N N AS PER KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS, DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE PAVED TO THE EDGE OF R-O-W PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO oss��C1GROP� DAMAGING OFF THE ROADWAY AVOID R = 25' MIN, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE ENTRANCE BE CROWNED SO THAT RUNOFF DRAINS OFF THE PAD ,$ 2 INSTALL DRIVEWAY CULVERT IF THERE IS A ROADSIDE DITCH PRESENT, AS PER KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS 4"-B" QUARRY SPALLS GEOTEXTILE 12" MIN. THICKNESS '+li PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/EGRESS AREA STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MAINTENANCE STANDARDS 1. QUARRY SPALLS (OR HOG FUEL) SHALL BE ADDED IF THE PAD IS NO LONGER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. IF THE ENTRANCE IS NOT PREVENTING SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO PAVEMENT, THEN ALTERNATIVE MEASURES TO KEEP THE STREETS FREE OF SEDIMENT SHALL BE USED. THIS MAY INCLUDE STREET SWEEPING, AN INCREASE IN THE DIMENSIONS OF THE ENTRANCE, OR THE INSTALLATION OF A WHEEL WASH, IF WASHING IS USED, IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA COVERED WITH CRUSHED ROCK, AND WASH WATER SHALL DRAIN TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR POND, 3. ANY SEDIMENT THAT IS TRACKED ONTO PAVEMENT SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY BY SWEEPING. THE SEDIMENT COLLECTED BY SWEEPING SHALL BE REMOVED OR STABILIZED ON SITE. THE PAVEMENT SHALL NOT BE CLEANED BY WASHING DOWN THE STREET, EXCEPT WHEN SWEEPING IS INEFFECTIVE AND THERE IS A THREAT TO PUBLIC SAFETY. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO WASH THE STREETS, THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SMALL SUMP SHALL BE CONSIDERED. THE SEDIMENT WOULD THEN BE WASHED INTO THE SUMP, 4. ANY QUARRY SPALLS THAT ARE LOOSENED FROM THE PAD AND END UP ON THE ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. 5. IF VEHICLES ARE ENTERING OR EXITING THE SITE AT POINTS OTHER THAN THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S), FENCING (SEE SECTION D.4.1) SHALL BE INSTALLED TO CONTROL TRAFFIC. 2 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE C3 NTS U co a V 1 cc V 1 � m 2"x2" BY 14 Ga. WIRE OR ~� c•i W EQUIVALENT, IF STANDARD Z `D Z JOINTS IN FILTER I W STRENGTH FABRIC USED FABRIC SHALL BE z W .--•r SPLICED AT POSTS. i I USE STAPLES, WIRE FILTER FABRIC Z W Q RINGS, OR N EQUIVALENT TO r � FFF�--11 = ATTACH FABRIC TO �/ '� U' Z ti Q W POSTS. 6' MAX, MINIMUM 4"x4" TRENCHLl POST SPACING MAY BE INCREASED I__l BACKFILL TRENCH WITH NATIVE SOIL OR 314"-1.5" TO 6' IF WIRE BACKING IS USED WASHED GRAVEL $ NOTE: FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE 2"x4" WOOD POSTS, STEEL FENCE 4 INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR WHENEVER POSSIBLE POSTS, REBAR, OR EQUIVALENT m SILT FENCE MAINTENANCE STANDARDS W a 1. ANY DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY 2. IF CONCENTRATED FLOWS ARE EVIDENT UPHILL OF THE FENCE, THEY MUST BE o INTERCEPTED AND CONVEYED TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR POND, 3, IT IS IMPORTANT TO CHECK THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE FENCE FOR SIGNS OF FENCE CLOGGING AND ACTING AS A BARRIER TO FLOW AND THEN CAUSING c� CHANNELIZATION OF FLOWS PARALLEL TO THE FENCE. IF THIS OCCURS, REPLACE THE FENCE OR REMOVE THE TRAPPED SEDIMENT, 4. SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED WHEN THE SEDIMENT IS 6 INCHES HIGH. 5. IF THE FILTER FABRIC (GEOTEXTILE) HAS DETERIORATED DUE TO ULTRAVIOLET BREAKDOWN, IT SHALL BE REPLACED,Ln o a FILTER FABRIC FENCE C3 NTS AS ti rl �°1A-� fiorsT g ,� �IONAL DATE 07/12/17 PERMIT NO.17-102125-00-UP DRAWN AS APPROVED CHECKED AEP JOB NO. 2017034 SHEET NO. C3 1 cn w z w 0 z N N DATE ENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FEDERAL WAY REVISED CODE (FWRC), APPLICABLE ORDINANCES, AND THE CITY COUNCIL CONDITIONS OF PROJECT APPROVAL. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE SUPPLEMENTED BY THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION (WSDOT/APWA), THE KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS (KCRS), AND THE KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL (KCSWDM). IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER TO CORRECT ANY ERROR, OMISSION, OR VARIATION FROM THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN THESE PLANS. ALL CORRECTIONS SHALL BE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST OR LIABILITY TO THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. 2. THE DESIGN ELEMENTS WITHIN THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL WAY ENGINEERING REVIEW CHECKLIST. SOME ELEMENTS MAY HAVE BEEN OVERLOOKED OR MISSED BY THE CITY ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEWER. ANY VARIANCE FROM ADOPTED STANDARDS IS NOT ALLOWED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. APPROVAL OF THIS ROAD, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION (LE. DOMESTIC WATER CONVEYANCE, SEWER CONVEYANCE, GAS, ELECTRICITY, ETC.) 4, BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY, A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING MUST BE HELD BETWEEN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, THE APPLICANT, AND THE APPLICANT'S CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATIVE. 5. A SIGNED COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS, 6. CONSTRUCTION NOISE SHALL BE LIMITED AS PER FWRC (SECTION 19.105.040); NORMALLY THIS IS 7:00 A.M. TO 8:00 P.M., MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, AND 9:00 A.M. TO 8:00 P.M. ON SATURDAYS. 7, IT SHALL BE THE APPLICANT'S/CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN ALL CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS NECESSARY BEFORE INITIATING OFF -SITE WORK WITHIN THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. 8. FRANCHISED UTILITIES OF OTHER INSTALLATIONS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THESE APPROVED PLANS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED UNLESS AN APPROVED SET OF PLANS THAT MEET ALL CITY REQUIREMENTS AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF KCRS CHAPTER 8 ARE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AT LEAST THREE DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, 9. VERTICAL DATUM SHALL BE KCAS OR NGVD-29. 10, GROUNDWATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE WITHIN A RIGHT-OF-WAY OR APPROPRIATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, BUT NOT UNDERNEATH THE ROADWAY SECTION. ALL GROUNDWATER SYSTEMS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE WSDOT/APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 11. ALL UTILITY TRENCHES IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE BACKFILLED 5/8" CRUSHED ROCK AND COMPACTED TO 95% DENSITY, WHEN TRENCH WIDTH IS 18 INCHES OR LESS, AND IS WITHIN THE TRAVELED WAY, TRENCH WILL BE BACKFILLED WITH CONTROL DENSITY FILL (SELF -COMPACTED FLOWABLE FILL) AS DEFINED BY WASHINGTON AGGREGATES AND CONCRETE ASSOCIATION, THE AGGREGATE WILL BE 318-INCH MINUS. 12. ALL ROADWAY SUBGRADE SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED TO 95% DENSITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT 2.06.3. 13. OPEN CUTTING OF EXISTING ROADWAYS IS NOT ALLOWED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AND NOTED ON THESE APPROVED PLANS. ANY OPEN CUT SHALL BE RESTORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH KCRS 8.03(B) 3. 14, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ADEQUATE SAFEGUARDS, SAFETY DEVICES, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT, FLAGGERS, AND ANY OTHER NEEDED ACTIONS TO PROTECT LIFE, HEALTH, AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC, AND TO PROTECT PROPERTY IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK COVERED BY THE CONTRACTOR, ANY WORK WITHIN THE TRAVELED RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT MAY INTERRUPT NORMAL TRAFFIC FLOW SHALL REQUIRE AT LEAST ONE FLAGGER FOR EACH LANE OF TRAFFIC AFFECTED. ALL SECTIONS OF THE WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 1-07.23 - TRAFFIC CONTROL, SHALL APPLY. 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL REGULATORY AND WARNING SIGNS PER THE LATEST EDITION OF MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. 16. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINAL GRADE AFTER PAVING ASPHALT WEARING COURSE, 17. ROCKERIES ARE CONSIDERED TO BE A METHOD OF BANK STABILIZATION AND EROSION ONLY, ROCKERIES SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED TO SERVE AS RETAINING WALLS. ALL ROCKERIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CFW DRAWING NUMBERS 3-22, 3-23, ROCKERIES MAY NOT EXCEED SIX FEET IN HEIGHT FOR CUT SECTIONS OR FOUR FEET IN HEIGHT FOR FILL SECTIONS UNLESS DESIGNED BY A GEOTECHNICAL OR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DRAINAGE NOTES: EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES: 1, APPROVAL OF THIS EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL (ESC) PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF PERMANENT ROAD OR DRAINAGE DESIGN (I.E. SIZE AND LOCATION OF ROADS, PIPES, RESTRICTORS, CHANNELS, RETENTION FACILITIES, UTILITIES, ETC.). 2, THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE ESC PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, REPLACEMENT, AND UPGRADING OF THESE ESC FACILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION IS APPROVED, 3. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CLEARING LIMITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, NO DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE FLAGGED CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE PERMITTED. THE FLAGGING SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE APPLICANTICONTRACTOR FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION, 4, THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL CLEARING AND GRADING ACTIVITIES, AND IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENT LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM OR VIOLATE APPLICABLE WATER STANDARDS. 5. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS, DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, THESE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE UPGRADED (LE. ADDITIONAL SUMPS, RELOCATION OF DITCHES AND SILT FENCES, ETC,) AS NEEDED FOR UNEXPECTED STORM EVENTS, 6. THE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR AND MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THEIR CONTINUED FUNCTIONING. 7. ANY AREA STRIPPED OF VEGETATION, INCLUDING ROADWAY EMBANKMENTS, WHERE NO FURTHER WORK IS ANTICIPATED OR A PERIOD OF 15 DAYS, SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH THE APPROVED ESC METHODS (I.E. SEEDING, MULCHING, NETTING, EROSION BLANKETS, ETC.) 8. ANY AREA NEEDING ESC MEASURES, NOT REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION, SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITHIN 15 DAYS. 9. THE ESC FACILITIES ON INACTIVE SITES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED A MINIMUM OF ONCE A MONTH OR WITHIN THE 48 HOURS FOLLOWING A STORM EVENT. 10. AT NO TIME SHALL MORE THAN ONE FOOT OF SEDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO ACCUMULATE WITHIN A CATCH BASIN. ALL CATCH BASINS AND CONVEYANCE LINES SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TO PAVING. THE CLEANING OPERATION SHALL NOT FLUSH SEDIMENT -LADEN WATER INTO THE DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM. 11. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND WASH PADS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED TO INSURE THAT ALL PAVED AREAS ARE KEPT CLEAN FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT, 12. WET SEASON REQUIREMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN APPENDIX D, SECTION D.52 OF THE KCSWDM ARE IN EFFECT BEGINNING OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30. 13, ANY PERMANENT RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY USED AS A TEMPORARY SETTLING BASIN SHALL BE MODIFIED WITH THE NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE CAPACITY. IF THE PERMANENT FACILITY IS TO FUNCTION ULTIMATELY AS AN INFILTRATION OR DISPERSION SYSTEM, THE FACILITY SHALL NOT BE USED AS A TEMPORARY SETTLING BASIN. NO UNDERGROUND DETENTION TANKS OR VAULTS SHALL BE USED AS A TEMPORARY SETTLING BASIN. 14. WHERE SEEDING FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED, FAST GERMINATING GRASSES SHALL BE APPLIED AT AN APPROPRIATE RATE (I.E. ANNUAL OR PERENNIAL RYE APPLIED AT APPROXIMATELY 80 POUNDS PER ACRE). 15. WHERE STRAW MULCH FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE APPLIED AT A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF TWO INCHES. 16. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PROVIDING SIGNIFICANT TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED PER SECTION 22-1568 (C) (6) (A G) OF FWRC. 1. PROOF OF LIABILITY INSURANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY PRIOR TO THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. 2. ALL PIPE AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE LAID ON A PROPERLY PREPARED FOUNDATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT 7.02.3(1). THIS SHALL INCLUDE LEVELING AND COMPACTING THE TRENCH BOTTOM, THE TOP OF FOUNDATION MATERIAL, AND REQUIRED PIPE BEDDING, TO A UNIFORM GRADE SO THAT THE ENTIRE PIPE IS SUPPORTED BY A UNIFORMLY DENSE UNYIELDING BASE. 3. STEEL PIPE SHALL BE GALVANIZED AND HAVE ASPHALT TREATMENT #10R BETTER INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. 4. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, SUCH AS CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES, NOT LOCATED WITHIN A TRAVELED ROADWAY OR SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE SOLID LOCKING LIDS. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED WITH A PERMANENT RETENTIONIDETENTION FACILITY SHALL HAVE SOLID LOCKING LIDS. 5. ALL CATCH BASIN GRATES SHALL CONFORM TO CFW DRAWING NUMBERS 4.1, 4-2, 4-3, 4.4 OR 4-5. 6. ALL DRIVEWAY CULVERTS LOCATED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT LENGTH TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM 3:1 SLOPE FROM THE EDGE OF THE DRIVEWAY TO THE BOTTOM OF THE DITCH. CULVERTS SHALL HAVE BEVELED END SECTIONS TO MATCH THE SIDE SLOPES, 7. ROCK FOR EROSION PROTECTION OF DITCHES, CHANNELS AND SWALES, WHERE REQUIRED, MUST BE OF SOUND QUARRY ROCK, PLACED TO A DEPTH OF ONE FOOT AND MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS: 4"4" ROCK/40%-70% PASSING; 2"-4" ROCK130%-40% PASSING; AND -2" ROCK/10%-20% PASSING. INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH KCRS DRAWING NUMBER 51 OR AS AMENDED BY THE APPROVED PLANS, RECYCLED ASPHALT OR CONCRETE RUBBLE SHALL NOT BE USED. 8. LOTS NOT APPROVED FOR INFILTRATION SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH DRAINAGE OUTLETS (STUB -OUTS), STUB -OUTS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING; A. EACH OUTLET SHALL BE SUITABLY LOCATED AT THE LOWEST ELEVATION ON THE LOT, SO AS TO SERVICE ALL FUTURE ROOF DOWNSPOUTS AND FOOTING DRAINS, DRIVEWAYS, YARD DRAINS, AND ANY OTHER SURFACE OR SUBSURFACE DRAINS NECESSARY TO RENDER THE LOTS SUITABLE FOR THEIR INTENDED USE. EACH OUTLET SHALL HAVE FREE -FLOWING, POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO AN APPROVED STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM OR TO AN APPROVED OUTFALL LOCATION. B. OUTLETS ON EACH LOT SHALL BE LOCATED WITH A FIVE-FOOT HIGH, 2 X 4 STAKE MARKED "STORM', THE STUBOUT SHALL EXTEND ABOVE SURFACE LEVEL, BE VISIBLE AND BE SECURED TO THE STAKE. C. PIPE MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO UNDERDRAIN SPECIFICATIONS DESCRIBED IN KCRS 7,04 AND, IF NONMETALLIC THE PIPE SHALL CONTAIN WIRE OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE DETECTION, D. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR DRAINAGE SYSTEMS DESIGNED TO CONVEY FLOWS THROUGH INDIVIDUAL LOTS, E. THE APPLICANTICONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE LOCATIONS OF ALL STUB -OUT CONVEYANCE LINES WITH RESPECT TO THE UTILITIES (I.E, POWER, GAS, TELEPHONE, TELEVISION). F. ALL INDIVIDUAL STUB -OUTS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE LOT HOMEOWNER. t-� E. X TX � 432111Y G1ST1 SL �C7 IONAL I PERMIT NO.17-102125-00-UP APPROVED DATE IN z 4 O a � U w w DATE 07/12/17 DRAWN AS CHECKED AEP JOB NO. 2017034 SHEET NO. C4 RESUBMITTED Dated: August 6th, 2018 AUG 0 6 2018 To: Leila Willoughby- Oakes CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUN[TY DEVELOPMENT Associate planner, city of Federal way Sutlect: Referece to fife #17-102W"DAV;.Tzd*3c4 rew; 1ettar Parcel 11960-01285, 2°d Avenue SW, Federal moray �a�-a�rs�,'axer�r����,rsz€B'•�nrsa�s�e�'�r�'s+�:r�rtxr ►e-s�.�• contacts. 1) Please see revised drawing completed by AP consultants adding frontage and storm water etc. as stated in the letter and coordinated with Ann Dower, city of Federal way. 2) Please see 7M-Wc %Zd Tepmt ivnm.44:'6 �ro"!e*M Te%acdr, tes_�. $s a►x�rsrrs� a*�s Services report far Ow sstes New r&t pfan was shared w&thGedTe&fer full evaluaticm and recommendation. Please note all items reviewed has been carefully considered and mitigation plans for buffer has been submitted-1 ,or-r ld like to thanks.for all your suggestions ab%B�gsned from your side duri this I am looking forward for timely approval. Thanks 317 SW 295E place Federal way, wa98023 APCONSULTING ENGINEERS PLLC CIVIL ENGINEERING August 3, 2018 Ms. Leila Willoughby -Oakes 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 RE: Sharma Residence (File 17-102125-OOUP) Response to Technical Review Letter #3 Leila: AUG 0 6 2018 f�7} LQP AY 4fE87' This letter addresses your first set of engineering review comments, dated June 28th, 2018: Leila Willou hb -Oakes-Plannin Division: 1. "Address all drainage and erosion control comments before land use approval. Proposed critical area intrusions, including clearing, grading and infrastructure within the stream buffer must be approved under Process III pursuant to FWRC 19.145.330(1)'. Proceeding with decision without confirming a final drainage system will delay building permits." Noted. 2. "On page 6 of the May 11, 2018 TIR, Section 6.0 is incorrect. There were additional special reports and studies required in conjunction with the proposed project for streams/ geologically hazardous areas. The City received a preliminary geotechnical report prepared by Ages Engineering, LLC, May 4, 2017. Erosion hazard areas exist along the eastern property line per the city's critical area mapping; please see Ann Dower's comments. Per FWRC 19.105.070, erosion hazard areas are defined as "those areas identified by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Natural Resource Conservation Service as having a moderate to severe or severe to very severe rill and inter -rill erosion hazard due to natural agents such as wind, rain, splash, frost action or stream flow; those areas containing the following group of soils when they occur on slopes of 15 percent or greater: Alderwood-Kitsap ("AkF"), Alderwood gravelly sandy loam ("AgD"), Kitsap silt loam ("KpD"), Everett ("EvD"), and Indianola ("InD"); and those areas impacted by shore land and/or stream bank erosion." The applicant's geotechnical report does not refer to or evaluate areas impacted by shore land and/or stream bank erosion; although a stream bisects the property. Therefore, it is possible that erosion hazard areas do exist on site — as the geologist conducted two test pits on the western portion of the site. " The project falls under the Targeted Drainage Review Category #1 because of the presence of the Type Np stream and wetland areas associated with the stream. The TIR has been updated to show how the project complies with the minimum APCE@APConsultingEngineers.com (253) 737-4173 PO Box 162, Auburn, WA 98071 requirements for the Targeted Drainage review. The geotechnical report dated January 4th, 2017 and the letter dated July loth, 2018 prepared by Ages Engineering, LLC have been added to Appendix F of the TIR. We expect that these address the concern noted by the City to this point in the time. Ann Dower —Public Works Development Services 1. "Condition of Approval — Right-of-way modification file no.18-101348-00-SM shall be resolved prior to building permit issuance. As a condition of approval, you must depict five feet of pavement along the subject property's frontage and restore the drainage. The city forwarded correspondence to you on June 15, 2018, in response to your request for reconsideration of the May 31, 2018, modification decision by the Deputy Public Works Director." The site plan has been updated to show 5-foot asphalt pavement along the property frontage, as requested. 2. "Recent email discussions indicate that the applicant's engineer and wetland biologist support splash blocks and/or dispersion trench to control runoff from the roof of the proposed single-family home. While these methods are generally supported, the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) has certain requirements for slopes, setback, sizing, etc. that may not be met on this site." A basic dispersion trench located near the northeast corner of the house and a splash block located near the southeast corner of the house are proposed to mitigate runoff from the proposed residence roof. The plans show how these meet the 2016 KCSWDM requirement for setbacks. 3. "In order to receive approval of the flow control system, the applicant must provide plans showing location, sizing, setbacks, slopes, and the complete flowpath of the dispersion device. If any of the flowpath or dispersion device fall within a slope that is steeper than 15%, a geotechnical engineer must stamp the plans and provide a plan for erosion control during plant establishment on the slope if there are to be plantings in that area'. It is not clear how much of the site might be within steep slope, erosion hazard, or landslide hazard areas, but any dispersion device within 200 feet of these must have a geotechnical analysis that considers cumulative impacts from the project and surrounding areas under full build -out conditions. Appendix C of the 2016 KCSWDM outlines all requirements that must be addressed." The location, sizing, setback, and slopes for the proposed dispersion BMPs are shown on the site plan. The proposed dispersion trench and splash block are within 200 feet of the erosion hazard area (per King County GIS) and, therefore, dispersion trench and vegetated flow path will be constructed per specification and recommendations provided in the Geotech's letter dated July 10th. 2018, prepared by Ages Engineering, LLC. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact us at (253) 737-4173. Sincerely, AP C sur.TING ENGINEERS PLLC Anut arena Civil Design Engineer I,-' FILE CITY OF Federal Way June 28, 2018 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma Emailed: sharmarco@yahoo.com 317 SW 295ti' Place Federal Way, WA 98023 Re: File #17-102034-00-UP; TECHNICAL REVIEW LETTER 93 Sharma Residence — Stream Buffer Intrusion Dear Mr. and Mrs. Sharma: City departments/divisions have the following comments in response to your May 11, 2018, submittal. Some comments provided herein are required and some are informative, while others may be applicable during future steps of the project. Comments in this letter need to be addressed prior to issuance of a land use application decision, or as otherwise noted. Questions regarding technical review comments should be addressed to the referenced staff representative. The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) can be accessed online at: http://www.codel2ublishing.com/WA/FederalWgty1. TECHNICAL COMMENTS The following items must be addressed prior to Process III `Project Approval'. Leila Willoughby -Oakes — Planning Division, (253) 835-2644, leila.ivilloughbv-oakes@ciLvoffederalway.com 1. Address all drainage and erosion control comments before land use approval. Proposed critical area intrusions, including clearing, grading and infrastructure within the stream buffer must be approved under Process III pursuant to FWRC 19.145.330(1)1. Proceeding with decision without confirming a final drainage system will delay building permits. 2. On page 6 of the May 11, 2018 TIR, Section 6.0 is incorrect. There were additional special reports and studies required in conjunction with the proposed project for streams/geologically hazardous areas. The City received a preliminary geotechnical report prepared by Ages Engineering, LLC, May 4, 2017. Erosion hazard areas exist along the eastern property line per the city's critical area mapping; please see Ann Dower's comments. Per FWRC 19.105.070, erosion hazard areas are defined as "those areas identified by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Natural Resource Conservation Service as having a moderate to severe or severe to very severe rill and inter -rill erosion hazard due to natural agents such as wind, rain, splash, frost action or stream flow; those areas containing the following group of soils when they occur on slopes of 15 percent or greater: Alderwood-Kitsap ("AkF"), Alderwood gravelly sandy loam ("AgD"), Kitsap silt loam ("KpD"), Everett ("EvD"), and Indianola ("InD"); and those areas impacted by shore land and/or stream bank erosion." The applicant's geotechnical report does not refer to or evaluate areas impacted by shore land and/or stream bank erosion; although a stream A request for an intrusion into a stream buffer will be reviewed and decided upon using Process III in Chapter `,.. �. FWRC. Responses to decisional criteria and design requirements in this section shall be included in the critical areas report. Mr. and Mrs. Sharma June 28, 2018 Page 2 of 3 bisects the property. Therefore, it is possible that erosion hazard areas do exist on site — as the geologist conducted two test pits on the western portion of the site. Steven Quarterman, Senior Ecologist, Landau Associates (City's Consultant) Landau has closed the review contract for this project. Please direct any questions to the project planner. 4. Landau provided an assessment in regard to critical areas in addition to the City's assessment of the drainage requirements under the 2016 KCSWDM. Best available science would not support a direct discharge via a piped draining stormwater from the new development to the stream. a. One function of stream buffers is water quality treatment of runoff (through filtration/infiltration). b. There are potential water quantity (flow) issues with the piped discharge. This option may simply be deferring the erosion problem to the stream and create bed/bank instability. These may have impacts to the Sharma property and potentially downstream properties. c. Landau suggests a vegetated swale. Please consult with the city's Development Services Division on the KCSWM requirements. Ann Dower — Public Works Development Services, (253) 835-2732, ann.dowerOcityoffederalway.com Public Works Development Services has reviewed the materials submitted for the above -referenced project. Prior to our Land Use approval, the applicant will need to address the following: 5. Condition of Approval — Right-of-way modification file no. 18-101348-00-SM shall be resolved prior to building permit issuance. As a condition of approval, you must depict five feet of pavement along the subject property's frontage and restore the drainage. The city forwarded correspondence to you on June 15, 2018, in response to your request for reconsideration of the May 31, 2018, modification decision by the Deputy Public Works Director. 6. Recent email discussions indicate that the applicant's engineer and wetland biologist support splash blocks and/or dispersion trench to control runoff from the roof of the proposed single-family home. While these methods are generally supported, the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) has certain requirements for slopes, setback, sizing, etc. that may not be met on this site. In order to receive approval of the flow control system, the applicant must provide plans showing location, sizing, setbacks, slopes, and the complete flowpath of the dispersion device. If any of the flowpath or dispersion device fall within a slope that is steeper than 15%, a geotechnical engineer must stamp the plans and provide a plan for erosion control during plant establishment on the slope if there are to be plantings in that areal. It is not clear how much of the site might be within steep slope, erosion hazard, or landslide hazard areas, but any dispersion device within 200 feet of these must have a geotechnical analysis that considers 2 Per FWRC 19.145.140(8), Monitoring Program, the stream buffer enhancement plan shall include a monitoring period of at least five years for plant establishment in the rehab ilitated/enhanced stream buffer. The detailed construction plans related to stormwater must also include measures to protect and maintain plants until established (FWRC 19.145.140.7.e). 17-102034-00-UP Doc. I.D. 77956 Mr. and Mrs. Sharma June 28, 2018 Page 3 of 3 cumulative impacts from the project and surrounding areas under full build -out conditions. Appendix C of the 2016 KCSWDM outlines all requirements that must be addressed. CLOSING Please be aware that this review does not preclude the city from requesting additional information related to any of the topics discussed above. Please submit revised application materials as appropriate, accompanied by the completed "Resubmittal Information Form" (enclosed). Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the city shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at leila.willou hb - oakes e cityoffederalway.com, or 253-835-2644. Sincerely, r Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Information Form c: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Steve Quarterman, Landau, email: s uarterm n landauine.com Adam E. Paul, PE, AP Consulting Engineers PLLC, email: ae aui(a a consultingen incers.com 17-102034-00-UP Doc. LD. 77956 MEMORANDUM CITY OF Federal Way, DATE: 6/26/F8 TO: Leila Willoughby -Oakes FROM: Ann Dower Public Works Department SUBJECT: SHARMA - STREAM BUFFER INTRUSION - (17-102034-00-UP) 120 SW 294TH ST Recent email discussions indicate that the applicant's engineer and wetland biologist support splash blocks and/or dispersion trench to control runoff from the roof of the proposed single-family home. While these methods are generally supported, the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) has certain requirements for slopes, setback, sizing, etc. that may not be met on this site. In order to receive approval of the flow control system, the applicant must provide plans showing location, sizing, setbacks, slopes, and the complete flowpath of the dispersion device. If any of the flowpath or dispersion device fall within a slope that is steeper than 15%, a geotechnical engineer must stamp the plans and provide a plan for erosion control during plant establishment on the slope if there are to be plantings in that area. It is not clear how much of the site might be within steep slope, erosion hazard, or landslide hazard areas, but any dispersion device within 200 feet of these must have a geotechnical analysis that considers cumulative impacts from the project and surrounding areas under full build -out conditions. Appendix C of the 2016 KCSWDM outlines all requirements that must be addressed. Dated: June 5th, 2018 To: EJ Walsh CC: Cole Elliott; Ann Dower; Leila Willoughby -Oaks Development service division City of federal way Subject: Reference to your letter dated May 31 st for frontage variance Please note that letter reference mentioned as " Permit #18-101348-00-SM; Right -of —Way Modification request; Sharma 120 SW 294E St, Federal way is in error. My permit is # 17-102034-00-UP and it is 2"d SW 2941h Street. Letter submitted for your approval for front side property improvements are out of my property line since 40 feet has been granted from 2"d Avenue in favor of Lakehaven Sewer District per recording #7602130712 so road is away from my property line by 40 feet and lined up with large trees with no ditch section on my side of the property. Improvement will not be harmonious with existing street improvements, would not function properly or safety or would not be advantageous to the neighborhood or city as a whole, Please see attached pictures of the street with existing homes. This improvement will look odd for the current street in the neighborhood environment. However I will provide improvement by cleaning up side and gravel on 5 feet to match with all houses on 2"d Ave. had discussed all above with Mr. Cole Elliot on 4th June and I am requesting you to please reconsider based upon facts attached with this letter and please grant waver. 1111IPi1171 Subhash C Sharma 317 SW 295th place Federal Way, WA98023 RECEIVE Attachments: 1 ) letter from city 2) Photos of the area jUN 0 7 20 C3TY OF FEDERAL- WAY cpMMUNrTY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF � Federal Way May 31, 2018 Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma 317 SW 29e PL Federal Way, WA 98023 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cftyoffederaWay.com Economic Development RE. Permit #18-101348-00-SM; Right -of -Way Modification Request; Sharma 120 SW 294th St, Federal Way Dear Mr. and Mrs. Sharma: The City of Federal Way has reviewed your request to waive frontage improvements on 2"d Ave SW. After evaluating the existing conditions along the referenced street, review of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) provisions (Section 19.135.280; 19.135.040), and the direction provided by the City Council, the Public Works Department hereby denies your request to waive frontage improvements, however a modification will be granted as follows: Corresponding to City Standard Street Section "W", 2nd Avenue SW is identified as a Local Road, which requires a 28 foot paved roadway with a 4-foot planter strip, 5-foot sidewalk and 3-foot utility strip on both sides. The road is currently paved to a width of 18 feet with 2' wide shoulders and ditch. FWRC section 19.135.070 criteria (1) "The improvements as required would not be harmonious with existing street improvements, would not function properly or safely or would not be advantageous to the neighborhood or city as a whole" applies to this frontage, since there is no curb, gutter, sidewalk, or planter strip in the neighborhood. The road, however, does need to meet minimum pavement width standards. The applicant will be responsible for half of the remaining pavement width necessary to bring the road up to standard. The applicant is required to increase the pavement width by 5 feet, and construct necessary tapers. The shoulder and ditch section must be restored to original width and function. Plans shall be prepared and stamped by a civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer, at 253-835-2732. Sincerely, J Walsh, P.E. Deputy Public Works Director EJW:AD/av CC. Cole Elliott, P.E.; Development Services Manager Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Associate Planner DECEIVE® Project File/AD Day File JUN 0 7 2018 \\CFWFILEI lications\C5DCIPRODIdocs\saveU50853_778I2 3I09I958.DOC Cf1Y OF FEDERAL WAy COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF Ak Federal Way Centered on Opportunity ltE�.� „r;_", COMMUNITY & tC1 rliLn+liL DEVELOPMEN-' !'EpAflTM_N1T May 31, 2018 Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma 317 SW 295th PL Federal Way, WA 98023 JIJN �;� tZot� CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www cityoffederal way, com Economic Development RE. Permit #18-101348-00-SM; Right -of -Way Modification Request; Sharma 120 SW 294"' St, Federal Way Dear Mr. and Mrs. Sharma: The City of Federal Way has reviewed your request to waive frontage improvements on 2nd Ave SW. After evaluating the existing conditions along the referenced street, review of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) provisions (Section 19.135.280; 19.135.040), and the direction provided by the City Council, the Public Works Department hereby denies your request to waive frontage improvements, however a modification will be granted as follows: Corresponding to City Standard Street Section "W", 2nd Avenue SW is identified as a Local Road, which requires a 28 foot paved roadway with a 4-foot planter strip, 5-foot sidewalk and 3-foot utility strip on both sides. The road is currently paved to a width of 18 feet with 2' wide shoulders and ditch. FWRC section 19.135.070 criteria (1) "The improvements as required would not be harmonious with existing street improvements, would not function properly or safely or would not be advantageous to the neighborhood or city as a whole" applies to this frontage, since there is no curb, gutter, sidewalk, or planter strip in the neighborhood. The road, however, does need to meet minimum pavement width standards. The applicant will be responsible for half of the remaining {pavement width necessa e_� - bring the road up to standard. The applicant is required to increase the pavement width by 5 fecund construct necessary tapers. The shoulder and ditch section must be restored to original w- h and f function. Plans shall be prepared and stamped by a civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer, at 253-835-2732. Sincerely, J Walsh, P.E. Deputy Public Works Director EJW:AD/av cc: Cole Elliott, P.E.; Development Services Manager Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Associate Planner Project File/AD Day File \\CFWFILEI\Applications\CSDC\PROD\docs\save\150853 77812_31081958.DOC APCONSULTING ENGINEERS PLLC CIVIL ENGINEERING May 3, 2018 Ms. Leila Willoughby -Oakes 33325 8thAvenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 RE: Sharma Residence (File 17-102125-OOUP) Response to 2nd Review Comments Leila: This letter includes a number of sets of comments. The responses immediately following this address response to the city's second set of engineering email comments, dated March 14th, 2017 and December 29f, 2017: 1. "The TIR says there no room for dispersion by the resubmittal letter says they are using splash blocks (contradictory)- which is dispersion." Splash blocks were proposed initially as just a typical residential feature and not intended to be a BMP. Splash blocks are no longer proposed for this project because the project does not meet the minimum requirements discussed in Section C.2A.1 of the 2016 KCSWDM. Instead of discharging the storm runoff onto the splash blocks they are proposed to be discharged onto the natural slopes of the property, without any BMPs. 2. "The TIR say the soils are inadequate for infiltration when they are. I would check that the TIR submitted is for the project in question." The soils present on the project site are identified as loamy sand in the King County Soil Survey, which is hydrological group C soil and is adequate for limited infiltration of stormwater. Even though the project site consists of soils that are adequate for limited infiltration BMPs, the project does not meet the other requirements listed in Section C.2.3 of the 2016 KCSWDM and, therefore, infiltration BMPs are not proposed in this project. The TIR has been updated to discuss the infeasibility criteria mentioned in Section C.2.3 of the 2016 KCSWDM. 3. "The pervious pavement located in the public row can't be in the ROW (first 10 feet)." The drawings have been updated so that the grasscrete pavement that was initially shown in the ROW has been replaced with concrete driveway. However, the driveway and the walkway inside the property is proposed to kttgP �EDgrasscrete material. MAY 11 2013 A GTY OF FEDER.A! YJAY ,,COMMUNITY DEVELC;?w1cNT APCE®APConsultingEngineers.com (253) 737-4173 PO Box 162, Auburn, WA 98071 4. "I think you discussed a ROW modification but did you apply for it and have it approved?" This is being addressed by the project owner. 5. The plans should be showing how the storm water proposal is viable. The civil plans do not show anything pertaining to the roof runoff. The splash blocks are no longer proposed for this project. Stormwater runoff from the proposed roof will be discharged onto the existing slope on the property. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact us at (253) 737-4173. Sincerely, A'P C NSULTING ENGINEERS PLLC Amit Sharma Civil Design Engineer } CITY HALL ciTv of 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way Federal Way, WA 3) 835-6325 7000 (253) 835-7000 www. cityofiederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor IC r5, 2lii 8 Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma Email: shannarco(@.Yahoo.com 317 SW 295`h Place Federal Way, WA 98023 RE: File #17-102125-00-AD; 2"D CRITICAL AREA TECHNICAL REVIEW Sharma Stream Buffer Intrusion, Parcel #119600-1285, Federal Way FILE Dear Mr. & Mrs. Sharma: On May 15, 2017, the City of Federal Way initiated a review of the Waterway and Wetland Delineation (dated May 3, 2017) for a Process III `Project Approval' stream buffer 'intrusion on the abovementioned parcel. On February 23, 2018, your second resuhmittal included a revised critical area report, stream buffer enhancement plan and mitigation sequencing plan for the impact proposed in a critical area buffer, prepared by Sewall Consulting. On February 23, 2018, the city forwarded your request to our wetland consultant, Landau, for their review. The city concurs with Landau's March 13, 2018, comments and requests more information. NEXT STEPS Please have your consultants review the comments and additional information in the enclosed memorandum prepared by Landau. Resubmit three (3) copies of the following revised materials to the City of Federal Way Permit Center with the enclosed resubmittal form: Revised Critical Areas Report Revised Critical Areas Report Addendum Revised Landscape Plan Also, please note your construction plans shall not depict pervious pavement within the right-of-way. These revisions shall be completed prior to a land use approval for the requested stream buffer intrusion. Should you have any questions about this letter, I can be reached at lei la.willou gh b - oakes _,cityoffederalway.com, or 253-835-2644. Sincere , r� eila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner c: Ed Sewell, Biologist, Emailed: esewall a sew lwe.Co (w/ memo) Adam Paul, AP Consulting Engineers, Emailed: AEPaul.1PGDnsuldngEn ineeis.ca (w/ memo) Amy Wolfe, ARW Landscape Design, Emailed: atwlf@icloud.com (w/ memo) Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer enc: Resubmittal Form Landau Technical Review of February 2018 Resubmittal 17-102125-00-AD Doc. I D. 77426 Alk CITY OF Federal Way DATE: 3/14/18 MEMORANDUM Public Works Department TO: Leila Willoughby -Oakes FROM: Ann Dower SUBJECT: SHARMA - STREAM BUFFER INTRUSION - (17-102034-00-UP) 120 SW 294TH ST The information provided on February 22, 2018 has been reviewed. The information did not address my comments from previous reviews. The stream butter intrusion may be approved only with the following conditions: 1. The building permit site plan shall show proper flow control meeting the requirements of the storm water regulations currently in place at the time of submittal. 2. An infiltration test meeting current storm water requirements shall be provided as part of the building permit to verify suitability for infiltration. 3. Only asphalt is allowed within public right-of-way. Grasscrete pavers may only be used on private property. 4. A separate Right -of -Way Permit will be required for work within the public right-of-way, such as the driveway and utilities. 5. Per Federal Way Revised Code section 19.135.030, the applicant will be required to build frontage improvements along 2"d Ave SW unless a right-of-way modification is granted. The applicant indicates in the response letter that an application for modification was made, however a file was not created. Please contact the Permit Center to verify that a complete application was submitted. The frontage improvements are a condition of building permit approval. AP CONSULTING ENGINEERS PLLC February 19, 2018 Ms. Leila Willoughby -Oakes 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 RE: Sharma Residence (File 17-102125-OOUP) Response to 19E Review Comments Leila: CIVIL ENGINEERING RESUBMITTED FEB 2 2 2018 CFFY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNRY DEVELOPMENT This letter includes a number of sets of comments. The responses immediately following this address response to the city's first set of engineering review comments, dated October 5th, 2017 and December 29th, 2017: Ann Dower, Development Services Division, ann.dower@cityo£federalway.com, 253-835-2732: Public Works has completed a review of the August 29, 2017, Sharma stream buffer intrusion technical information report submittal. The applicant is required to provide additional information on how, exactly, the roof runoff will be conveyed and where a dispersion pipe, outfall, trench, etc. will be located. The stormwater plan for Sharma Residence was prepared to meet the standards found in the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) as administered by the City of Federal Way. Per Section C.1.3.1, the project is considered a small lot and small lot BMPs are required to be implemented, as feasible. The small lot BMPs were analyzed for their feasibility in this project. Due to the presence of a type Np stream and a category IV wetland located at the West edge of the property, there is limited space available on the property to place any flow control BMPs. The runoff from the house roof will be dissipated via splash block, the runoff then disperses through the forested area and discharges into the stream. The dispersion pipes or the trenches are not proposed for this project, to keep the buffer disturbance at a minimum. 2_ The applicant is required to provide frontage improvements along the property frontage(s) - 2nd Ave SW is type W street, and should consist of 28' of pavement with 4' planter strips, 5' sidewalks, 3' utility strips, street-lightings, and street trees on both sides. The developer is responsible for bringing their frontage into conformation with the FWRC. The project owner of this project has elected to apply for a Right of Way Modification Application in lieu of frontage improvements along the property frontage. APCE@APConsultingEngineers.com (253) 737-4173 PO Box 162, Auburn, WA 98071 The responses immediately following this address the City's letter of December 29th, 2017: 1. Site Plan - With the residence footprint redesign, please list the total lot coverage. You propose Grass -Crete and building footprint reduced by 50 square feet. a. The applicant proposes a Grass -Crete driveway in order to reduce impervious surface impacts within the stream and wetland buffers. Grass -Crete will be counted at only 50 percent lot coverage per FWRC 19.110.020 (c) b. You may consider making any proposed walkways and decks Grass -Crete to further reduce buffer disturbance/ mitigation requirements. The total impervious area coverage on the lot is 2,147 square feet (1,500 sf of proposed building footprint + 1,012 square feet of proposed Grass -Crete driveway + 282 square feet of Grass -Crete walkway). As requested the proposed driveway and the walkway in this project will be Grass -Crete. 2. The city is waiting on a revised critical area plan, report, and mitigation sequencing prepared by Sewall Wetland Consultants in response to the enclosed Landau memo. Do depict the 40-foot wetland buffers, although they are within the stream buffer. The 40-foot wetland buffer has been added to the site plan. 3. Critical Area Signs - Please place this note on the construction plan as condition of the process III approval: "The boundary between a critical area buffer and contiguous land shall be identified with permanent signs. The signs shall be designed for high durability and installed one per lot maintained by the property owner in perpetuity." Addressed by others. 4. Prior to building occupancy, the applicant shall record a critical area restrictive covenant on title (sample enclosed). The plan shall include and delineate all areas with their critical areas associated buffers and building setbacks. The final process III site plan shall be attached to the notice on title per FWRC 19.145.170. Addressed by others. 5. Please show the wetland buffer within the Np stream buffer using different hatch - marks. Estimate the total wetland buffer and stream buffer square footage impacted by 35*50 (1750 square foot) building footprint, driveway, and other proposed site improvements. A long rambler or ranch style residence might reduce the amount of wetland mitigation, planting and bonding amounts required to monitor plantings/buffer restoration work within a wetland buffer (FWRC 19.145.130 (2)) Wetland buffer within the Np stream buffer is shown using different hatch -marks. Total estimated buffer impact by the proposed development is shown on the site plan prepared by Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. 6. It appears the applicant proposes development within the wetland buffer -wetland buffer mitigation requirements would apply, which vary from stream buffer enhancement plans. Please see the enclosed code sections. The proposed residence has been moved out of the wetland buffer area in updated site plan. There are no proposed developments in the wetland buffer. 7. Front Yard Setback- If the following applies, you may reduce the front yard setback to 10- feet from the property line. "Front yard setbacks for single-family residential development on lots with a slope of 15 percent or greater may be applied in a flexible manner where such application will protect slopes and natural features from development encroachments. However, a minimum front yard setback of 10 - feet must be maintained in all cases, and a minimum 20-foot setback shall apply to garages, unless the garage and driveway are oriented in such a way as to provide minimum 20-feet length of parking area (label calculation on site plan) in front of the garage within the property boundaries." The site is a corner lot and therefore, 10 feet shall also be maintained from the 20-foot ingress/egress easement (SW 294th Street). Please show the areas on the parcel with a slope of 15 percent of greater. On Sheet L1, note the contours intervals for staff to evaluate if FWRC 19.120.110 (6) applies. Moving the building closer to 2nd Avenue SW, or reducing the building footprint to 1,600 square feet, may decrease critical area impacts. The applicant's geotechnical report states there are no slopes on site greater than 15 percent, but they do not state if there are slopes equal to 15 percent. If there are slopes equal to 15 percent FWRC 19.120.110 (6) can apply if accepted by public works. The front setback for the proposed house has been reduced to 10-feet from the west property line. Slope labels for the site areas that are 15 percent or greater have been added to the site plan. The building footprint has been reduced to 1,500 square feet in order to reduce the critical area impacts on the property. 8. If above is not the case, the applicant may consider requesting an administrative variance of 25 percent of the front setback designate (from 20 feet to 15 feet) pursuant per FWRC 19.45.303 variance approval criteria (enclosed). Please contact Associate Planner Leila Willoughby -Oakes at Leila.willoughby-oakes@cityoffederalway.com if you have any questions. The case mentioned above applies to this project, therefore, no variance is required. 9.On Sheet 1 of 1, add the following note under critical area fence notes: "Fence posts shall be placed in crushed rock backfill." Addressed by others. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact us at (253) 737-4173. Sincerely, AP NSULTING ENGINEERS PLLC 6k,-/ Amit Sharma Civil Design Engineer MEMORANDUM CITY OF - Federal Way DATE: February 23, 2018 Community Development Department TO: Ann Dower, Development Services Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue Steve Quarterman, Landau (City's On -Call Consultant) FROM: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Planning SUBJECT: Sharma Resubmittal- UP3 Intrusion Request (17-102034-UP) 120 SW 294t" Street (Parcel No. 119600-1285) Hi All, Attached are the revised engineering, landscaping, site plans and a TIR for the Sharma stream buffer intrusions for your review. *Chris and Brian, the house design and driveway have changed slightly to reduce the building foot -print proposed in the stream buffer (house moved closer to 2"d Ave. SW) and to avoid the wetland buffer entirely. The applicant is permitted to have reasonable use of the site if they prove they have follow our mitigation sequencing requirements (entire avoidance, minimization, rectifying etc.). Please advise if this impacts any of your past comments. Chris, if the house is likely to be sprinkled, we can condition the land use approval so the applicant knows this going forward.* Let me know if you have any questions. Leila Ext. 2644 i ILE CITY OF CITY HALL Federal Way, , Avenue South 6325 Federal Way Federal Way, WA 3) 835-7000 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor February 23, 2018 Steven Quarterman Emailed: s uarterman .landauinc.com Landau Associates Inc. 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: File #17-102125-00-AD; 312D PARTY STREAM/WETLAND DELINEATION REVIEW Sharma Residence, XXXX SW 294th St.,* No Site Address*, Parcel 119600-1285, Federal Way Dear Mr. Quarterman, On February 22, 2018, the project proponent resubmitted environmental review documents and plans for a requested stream buffer intrusion (city file no. 17-10203 4-00-UP). Please advise if additional peer review fees are necessary to continue with your review of the abovementioned file. If so, the applicant (Subhash Sharma) will be contacted for additional fee payrnents.l The resubmitted documents are also located on the city's FTP site at: llcfwinternetlft root\Outbox10D1. The city kindly requests your response to these documents within two weeks of this letter. Should you have any questions please contact me at leila.Willoughbv-Oakes _ ciboffederalway.com or 253-835- 2644. Sincerely, ; • ref � (��� Leila Willoughby -Oakes -- — Associate Planner enc: Sewall Revised Plan Critical Area Mitigation Plan Response prepared by Sewall Landscape P1anIBuMr Enhancement prepared by ARW Civil Plans prepared by AP Consulting Engineers 1 Please note, the applicant initially deposited $5,300.00 in an environmental pass -through account with the city. Doc, I.D. 77334 17-102125-00-AD Dated: February Kt#r, 2-018 To: Leila Willoughby- Oakes Associate planner, city of Federal way Subject: Reference to letter dated Decerr b r 2% 2017 !rcg . +# 7-1 Q2-11-5-00-AD, Parcel 11960-01285, 2"d Avenue SW, Federal way Your letter was reviewed and requirements stated in letter as follows are attached with this letter in addition to revised plot plan location avoiding wetland buffer mitigation. Following items are attached witiht this letter. 1) Seawall consultant's revised report and input for buffer enhancement and all input required in reply to LANDAU ASSOCIATES 3`d party review report. 2) Please see attached revised Site plan, Grading and drain -age plan shov ing-we" and buffer and revisions required per LANDAU ASSOCIATIES 3M party review report. 3) ARW Landscape Design has provided Tree retention and landscape planting shown on Seawall drawing. 4) Pictures provided by Landau Associates for clearing tree branches on the property have been noticed at the tune of purchase of the p rop:errtu in, Ilan 2016_ 1 did &i-zcw,ss this ,k,:, Mr R.ob�- r Hansen and yourself for removal but was advised not to touch ground untl approval. There are swings hanging from trees, tires and other stuff still lying on the property. Please note that no alternation has been done. 5) Please see attachment for Ann Dower's comments feedback regarding frontage improvement variance. 6) Please see attachment for Brian from Lake Haven utilities for easement/ setback evidence. Please note all items reviewed has been carefully considered and mitigation plans for buffer has been submitted. I would like to extend my thanks for all your suggestions obtained from your side during this process_ I am looking forward for timely approval. Thanks t Subhash Sharma 317 SW 295" place Federal way, wa98023 RESUBMITTED FEB 2 2 2018 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT r r�l ciry OF Federal Way Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma 317 SW 295t'l Place Federal Way, WA 98023 sli,armarco@yahs?o.com Re: File #17-10.2034-00-UP (17-102125-00-AD); PLANNING REVIEW Sharma Residence —Stream Buffer Intrusion Request Parcel: 11960-01285, 2nd Avenue SW, Federal Way Dear Subhash and Shakuntla Sharma: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor December 29, 2017 FILE The applicant requests approval to encroach up to a maximum of approximately 18-20 feet into a 50-foot Np stream buffer. City staff has reviewed your Use Process III Master Land Use application and materials resubmitted on August 29, 2017, depicting a single family residence, curved driveway, and critical area fencing. The application was deemed incomplete and the city requested additional information on June 13, 2017. The city received a resubmittal on August 29, 2017, and deemed the application complete with technical comments on October 5, 2017. THIRD PARTY REVIEW The applicant authorized a third -party review of the streamwedand delineation and stream buffer enhancement plan on September 25, 2017. The city's consultant, Landau, completed a technical review on December 15, 2017, and it was sent to the applicant on December 20, 2017. Landau will review the applicant's forthcoming revisions. If you have any questions regarding Landau's memo, please contact the project planner directly. TECHNICAL COMMENTS The following items must be addressed prior to Planning Division approval. The city's development review committee and other agency comments were enclosed in the October 5, 2017, letter and remain outstanding. Site Plan — With the residence footprint redesign, please list the total lot coverage. You propose grass- crete and a building footprint reduced by 50 square feet. a. The applicant proposes a grass-crete driveway in order to reduce impervious surface impacts within the stream and wetland buffers. Grass-crete will be counted at only 50 percent lot coverage per FWRC 19.110.020(2)(c). b. You may consider making any proposed walkways and decks grass-crete to further reduce buffer disturbance/mitigation requirements. 2. The city is waiting on a revised critical area plan, report, and mitigation sequencing prepared by Sewall Wetland Consultants in response to the enclosed Landau memo. Do depict the 40-foot wetland buffers, although they are within the stream buffer. Fk #17-102034-00-UP Doc. LD. 76943 Subhash & Shakunda Sharma December 29, 2017 Page 2of3 3. Critical Area Si,gns — Please place this note on the construction plans as a condition of the Process III approval: "The boundary between a critical area buffer and contiguous land shall be identified with permanent signs. The signs shall be designed for high durability and installed one per lot- -maintained by the property owner in perpetuity." The city will requirean affidavit and pictures before final occupancy.in order to prevent future critical area disturbance. 4. Prior to building occupancy, the applicant shall record a critical area restrictive covenant on title (sample enclosed). The plan shall include and delineate all critical areas with their associated buffers and building setbacks. The final Process III site plan shall be attached to the notice on title per FWRC 19.145.170. 5. Please show the wedand buffers within the Np stream buffer using different hatch -marks. Estimate the total wetland buffer and stream buffer square footage impacted by the 35 x 50 (1750 square foot) building footprint, driveway, and other proposed site improvements. A long rambler or ranch style residence might reduce the amount of wetland mitigation, plantings, and bonding amounts required to monitor plantings/buffer restoration work within a wedand buffer (FWRC 19.145.130[2]). 6. It appears the applicant proposes development within the wetland buffer —wetland buffer mitigation requirements would apply, which vary from stream buffer enhancement plans. Please see the enclosed code sections. 7. Front Yard Setback —If the following applies, you may reduce the front yard setback to 10 feet from the property -line: "Front yard setbacks for single-family residential development on lots with a slope of 15 percent or greater may be applied in a flexible manner where such application will protect slopes and natural features from development encroachments. However, a minimum front yard setback of 10 feet must be maintained in all cases, and a minimum 20 foot setback shall apply to garages, unless the garage and driveway are oriented in such a way as to provide minimum 20 feet length of parking area [label calculation on site plan] in front of the garage within the property boundaries." The site is a corner lot and therefore, 10 feet shall also be maintained from the 20 foot ingress/egress easement (SW 2940, Street). Please show the areas on the parcel with a slope of 15 percent or greater. On Sheet L1, note the contours intervals for staff to evaluate if FWRC 19.120.110(6) applies. Moving the building closer to 2.d Avenue SW, or reducing the building footprint to 1,600 square feet, may decrease critical area impacts. The applicant's geotechnical report states there are no slopes on site greater than 15 percent, but they do not state if there are slopes equal to 15 percent. If there are slopes equal to 15 percent FWRC 19.120.110(6) can apply if accepted by Public Works. 8. If the above is not the case, the applicant may consider requesting an administrative variance of 25 percent of the front yard setback designate (from 20 feet to 15 feet) pursuant per FWRC 19.45.303 variance approval criteria (enclosed). Please contact Associate Planner Leila Willoughby -Oakes at leila.willoughbv-oakesncitvoffede_ralwa;v.cam if you have any questions. File 417-102034-00-UP Doc, I D. 76943 Subhash & Shakunda Sharma December 29, 2017 Page 3 of 3 9. On Sheet 1 of 1, add the following note under critical area fence notes: "Fence posts shall be placed in crushed rock backfill." Revise critical area sign Note #4: "Attached to fence using a 5/16" DLA. Galvanizing lag bolt. If post is used, set post a minimum of 3' below grade. Post shall be set is eaner-ete placed in crushed rock backfill. ' Rock backfill is a softer approach than setting concrete for fence posts and signage within a critical area buffer. BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE REQUIRED 1. Traffic impact fees will be required and calculated at the time of the building permit. 2. A future Process III decision regarding the requested critical area intrusions does not grant license to begin any type of site work. However, I have enclosed the related residential building permit checklists, sample restrictive covenant, and materials. Please contact the permit center at 253-835-2607, or nermitcenterCc cit<�offederalway.corn, if you have any questions regarding building permit submittals. CLOSING Please provide four copies of each revised plan and report with the enclosed completed resubmittal form for routing. I advise you combine all your material revisions from various consultants at once in order to reduce the number of project resubmittals and the processing time. A 120-day time line for reviewing the Process III application has started, as of September 12, 2017, The city's development regulations allow the department 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. The 120-day time line was stopped on October 5, 2017, and your project remains on hold. Should you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please contact me at 253-835-2644, or leila wiUoughbv-Oakes(@citzoffederalwavcoin- Sincerely, Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner enc: Permit Application Residential Checklist Resubmittal Information Form Plan Mark -Ups (emailed only) Critical Areas Restrictive Covenant (Sample) King County Recording Requirements c: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Steve Quarterman, Senior Biologist, Landau Associates Inc., s u rt r n Ian au nc.cam Doc I D 76943 File #17-102034-00-UP CITY Of Federal December 27, 2017 Subhash & Shakunda Sharma 317 SW 2951h Place Federal Way, WA 98023 sharmarco(@vahoo.co CITY HALL Federal Way, , Avenue South WayFederal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com FILE Jim Ferrell, Mayor Re: File #17-102125-00-AD; 3RDPARTY REVIEW FEES Sharma Buffer Intrusion; 2nd Avenue & SW 294th Street, Federal Way (Parcel 119600-1285) Dear Subhash & Shakunda Sharma: Enclosed, please find the invoice for a third party review of your upcoming wetland/stream critical area report and plan revisions for parcel #119600-1285, by Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. The city forwarded you December 15, 2017, review comments Erom the city's consultant (Landau Associates) on December 20, 2017. Per Landau, the estimate is $560.00 for the review of your revised plans and/or critical area report for consistency with the City of Federal Way's critical areas ordinance, as previous payments were drawn down by the work performed. Per conversations with staff, prior peer review quotes did not include the plan or report resubmissions. Please make out a check in the amount of $560.00, made payable to the City of Federal Way, or contact the Permit Center at 253-835-2607 to pay by phone. If any funds go unused, they will be returned to the applicant. Following receipt, the project planner will authorize the consultant to begin their review of report revisions for your Process III stream buffer intrusion application. Should you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please contact me at 253-835-2644, or leila.willo hb -oakes ci ffeder bvau.com. Sincerely, Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Form New Task Authorization Signed by City & City's Consultant Fee Invoice c: Ed Sewall, Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc., ¢-cu-.a 1 sewnllwF.yc7rrm Adam E. Paul, PE, AP Consulting Engineers PLLC, e P ul kPCon,,ultin Fin irn • . -nm File #17-102125-00-AD Doc. LD. 77058 CITY DF .. Federal Way December 20, 2017 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Subhash and Shakuntla Sharma Email: sharmarcot�ahoo.com 317 SW 295 h Place Federal Way, WA 98023 RE: File #17-102125-00-AD; 3'D PARTY STREAM/WETLAND REPORT REVIEW Stream Buffer Intrusion Request, Parcel: 119600-1285, Federal Way Dear Mr. & Mrs. Sharma: On May 15, 2017, the City of Federal Way initiated a third party review of the Waterway and Wetland Delineation and June 19, 2017 Addendum for parcel number 119600-1285, prepared by Sewall Consulting (May 3, 2017). The report indicated that there is a Type Np (perennial non -fish habitat stream) with a 50-ft. buffer and Category IV Wetland with a 40-ft. wetland buffer onsite. CRITICAL AREA REPORT The city forwarded your request to our wetland consultant, Landau Associates, for their review. Biologist Steve Quarterman completed a site visit on December 5, 2017, reviewed relevant documents, and prepared a technical memorandum (December 15, 2017) in which they concur with a majority of Sewall's critical area review but requires additional information in order to adequately address the city's critical areas ordinance. The city concurs with Landau's review and requests more information/site analysis, outlined in the enclosed memorandum. Landau's December 15, 2017, technical memorandum states two major revision items. Please carefully read the enclosed Landau memo for all review items: "The Critical Areas Report does not satisfy all of the evaluation criteria provided in FWRC 19.145.410(2). A subsequent report will be required by the city to include the following items referenced in FWRC 19.145.410(2): • Photographs of the site and critical areas; • A description of efforts made to apply mitigation sequencing pursuant to FWRC 19.145.130 to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to critical areas. The Critical Areas Report does not provide discussion of impact avoidance and minimization. Based on LAI's understanding of the project, impact avoidance is achieved for the stream and wetland identified in the Critical Areas Report, and discussion of minimization of buffer impacts is not provided." "The conceptual site plan presented in the Critical Areas Report and the July 5, 2017 (Resubmitted August 29, 2017) site plan prepared by AP Consulting Engineers identify the 50-ft Type Np stream Mr. & Mrs. Sharma December 20, 2017 Page 2 buffer, but do not show the 40-ft wetland buffer. Based on the site plan prepared by AP Consulting Engineers, it appears the proposed residence will encroach in the wetland buffer. As a result, the wetland buffer will need to be included on project site plans and encroachment evaluated in accordance with FWRC Section 19.145.440 (Development within wetland buffers) [and mitigated accordingly]. LAI's review of stream buffer impacts and mitigation sequencing provided in the Critical Areas Report will be completed following any updates based on evaluation of wetland buffer impacts/mitigation sequencing." NEXT STEPS Please review the comments and additional information requests in the memo prepared by Landau. A revised wetland report, stream buffer mitigation plan, wetland mitigation plan, mitigation sequencing evaluation and construction plans must be submitted prior to land use approval or building permit submittals. The wetlands, associated buffers, and building setback must be delineated on the site plan of the current Process III `Project Approval' application in conformance with Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.145.150(4), 19.145.160, and 19.145.420. You are encouraged to review FWRC 19.145.440(5) and (6) ("Development within wetland buffers") in order to determine if you wish to proceed with meeting the minimum wetland buffer averaging or wetland buffer reduction with enhancement requirements. The applicant may not combine the above -mentioned reduction and averaging processes. The revised report will be peer reviewed at the applicant's expense in accordance with Federal Way Revised Code 19.145.080(3). *Alternatively, the applicant may submit a modified site plan or choose an alternative house design depicting a residence and driveway footprint and site improvements (patios, gardens, etc.) outside of the 40-ft. wetland buffer and forego the wetland mitigation plan and sequencingi requirements of FWRC 19.145.140.* Should you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please contact me at 253-835-2644, or leila.willoughby-oakes@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, 1 Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner o: Ed Sewell, Biologist, Emailed: esewall sewallwc.com (w/ encls.) Adam Paul, AP Consulting Engineers, Emailed: AEPauI a APConstiltin En ineers.com enc: Resubmittal Form Landau December 5, 2017 Technical Memorandum 'Mitigation sequencing refers to a demonstration by an applicant that all reasonable efforts have been examined with the intent to avoid and minimize impacts to critical areas. When alteration to a critical area is proposed, such alteration shall be avoided, minimized, or compensated pursuant to FWRC 19.145-.130(1)-(6). 17-102125-00-AD Doc. LD. 77041 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITI, DEVELOPMENT 81h Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 CITY OF 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 Federal Way www.cityoffiaderolwoy.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: 7. Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significarce (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Pelmit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed Xf e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on C)r,+ � , 2017. Project Name File Number(s) 1`7-/10 2 0 2, Signature Date K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution_doc/Last printed 1 / 12/2017 10:33:00 AM k CITY Or Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Sharma Residence - Stream Buffer Intrusion Project Description: A `Process III' land use review for a requested stream buffer intrusion per Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.145.330. The applicant proposes to intrude into a regulated stream buffer to construct a new single family home. The proposal includes a Stream Buffer Enhancement Plan, prepared by Sewall Wetland Consulting in order to minimize the proposed critical area impacts. Applicant: Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma 253-639-3599 1 sharmarco@yahoo.com Project Location: 2"d Ave. SW & SW 201' St., Federal Way Parcel #119600-1285 Date Application Received: May 4, 2017 Date Determined Incomplete: June 13, 2017 Date Determined Complete: September 12, 2017 Notice of Application Date: October 6, 2017 Comment Due Date: October 20, 2017 �1 ; l Project Site— �-- i— Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File 17-102125-00-UP) and Environmental Third Party Review (File 17-102125-00-AD) Existing Environmental Documents: Critical Areas Designation Report dated May 3, 2017 and Buffer Enhancement Plan, Proposed Sharma Residence dated June 19, 2017 prepared by Sewall Wetland Consulting Inc., Critical Area Map prepared by ESM, dated April 27, 2017, Preliminary Geotechnical Report prepared by Ages Engineering LLC (dated January 4, 2017), and Technical Information Report prepared by AP Consulting, dated July 12, 2017. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19 "Zoning and Development Code." Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments regarding the application to the Community Development Director by 5:00 p.m. on October 20, 2017. Only persons who submit written comments to the director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Availability of File: The official project file and environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Department of Community Development (33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003). Staff Contact: Leila W-Oakes, Associate Planner, 253-835-2644, Lei la.Willou libv-Oakesncitvorfederalwnv.com Published in the Federal Way Mirror October 6, 2017 17-102034-00-UP Doc I.D. 75877 Tamara Fix From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Good Morning Tamara, Linda Mills <Imills@kentreporter.com> Thursday, October 05, 2017 9:33 AM Tamara Fix Re: Sharma Legal Notice 1982144.PDF I have received your notice (re: Master Land Use Application Sharma Residence) to be published in the Federal Way Mirror on Friday, October 6, 2017. Thank you, Linda Linda Mills Legal/Public Notice Advertising - Obituary Representative. Auburn, Bellevue, Bothell/Kenmore, Covington/Maple Valley/Black Diamond, Issaquah/Sammamish,Kent, Kirkland, Mercer Island, Redmond and Renton Reporters, Federal Way Mirror, Snoqualmie Valley Record, and Okanogan Valley Gazette -Tribune Direct:253-234-3506 Internal:36027 Fax:253-437-6016 19426 68th Ave. S., Ste A, Kent, WA 98032 Map Print Rates Online Rates Media Kit Sound Info On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Tamara Fix <Tamara.Fix: e,cityoffederalway.colrt> wrote: Please publish the attached legal notice (Sharma NOA, 17-102034) in Friday's (Oct. 6, 2017) issue. Please confirm and issue an affidavit of publication. -:r•= clt NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Sharma Residence - Stream Buffer Intrusion Project Description: A 'Process III' land use review for a requested stream buffer intrusion per Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.145.330. The applicant proposes to intrude into a regulated stream buffer to construct a new single family home. The proposal includes a Stream Buffer Enhancement Plan, prepared by Sewall Wetland Consulting in order to minimize the proposed critical area impacts. Applicant: Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma 253-639-3599 1 sharmarco@yalioo.com Project Location: 2°d Ave. SW & SW 294°i St., Federal Way Parcel # 1 19600-1285 Date Application Received: May 4, 2017 Date Determined Incomplete: June 13, 2017 Date Determined Complete: September 12, 2017 Notice of Application Date: October 6, 2017 Comment Due Date: October 20, 2017 'r. �.04t �G_ _. .. 4i i Project Site Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File 17-102125-00-UP) and Environmental Third Party Review (File 17-102125-00-AD) Existing Environmental Documents: Critical Areas Designation Report dated May 3, 2017 and Buffer Enhancement Plan, Proposed Sharma Residence dated June 19, 2017 prepared by Sewall Wetland Consulting Inc., Critical Area Map prepared by ESM, dated April 27, 2017, Preliminary Geotechnical Report prepared by Ages Engineering LLC (dated January 4, 2017), and Technical Information Report prepared by AP Consulting_ dated July 12, 2017. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 16 "Surface Water Management." and Title 19 "Zoning and Development Code." Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments regarding the application to the Community Development Director by 5:00 p.m. on October 20, 2017. Only persons who submit written comments to the director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Availability of File: The official project file and environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Department of Community Development (33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003). Staff Contact: Leila W-Oakes, Associate Planner, 253-835-2644, L eila.Willottuliby-Oakes.{rTitvot't'e(hrr,11%�'�tv.collI Published in the Federal Wav Mirror October 6, 2017 17-10203a-00-UP D- I D 7W7 1 Parcel 797820-007: Number _ Name MCCLINCY TIM W Site 33339 18TH A\x- 5 98003 Address _ Legal STATE PLAT IN SEC 15-21-4 S 50 FT OF W 271 FT TGW 5 25 FT OF W 130.5 FT OF N 360 FT -- PER KCLLA#9603024 (APPR 414/86) =ar Built 1964 Total Square Footage 2180 Number Of Bedrooms 4 Number Of Baths 2.00 Grade 7 Average Condition Good Lot Size 16812 Views No [Waterfront DEPARTNIENT OF CONIINIUNIM, DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cit offederolwa .com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ;, Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Pemnit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was X mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 0[J 15: 2017. Project Name File Number(s) 1-7 -1Da Q 57 Signature _ g Date 1 b - _'a 'l Y,:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Los t printed 1 /12/2017 10:33:00 AM j 1�k CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Sharma Residence - Stream Buffer Intrusion Project Description: A `Process III' land use review for a requested stream buffer intrusion per Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.145330. The applicant proposes to intrude into a regulated stream buffer to construct a new single family home. The proposal includes a Stream Buffer Enhancement Plan, prepared by Sewall Wetland Consulting in order to minimize the proposed critical area impacts. Applicant: Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma 253-639-3599 1 sharmarco@yahoo.com Project Location: 2„d Ave. SW & SW 2941h St., Federal Way Parcel #119600-1285 Date Application Received: May 4, 2017 Date Determined Incomplete: June 13, 2017 Date Determined Complete: September 12, 2017 Notice of Application Date: October 6, 2017 Comment Due Date: October 20, 2017 Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File 17-102125-00-UP) and Environmental Third Party Review (File 17-102125-00-AD) Existing Environmental Documents: Critical Areas Designation Report dated May 3, 2017 and Buffer Enhancement Plan, Proposed Sharma Residence dated June 19, 2017 prepared by Sewall Wetland Consulting Inc., Critical Area Map prepared by ESM, dated April 27, 2017, Preliminary Geotechnical Report prepared by Ages Engineering LLC (dated January 4, 2017), and Technical Information Report prepared by AP Consulting, dated July 12, 2017. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19 "Zoning and Development Code." Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments regarding the application to the Community Development Director by 5:00 p.m. on October 20, 2017. Only persons who submit written comments to the director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Availability of File: The official project file and environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Department of Community Development (33325 8d' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003). Staff Contact: Leila W-Oakes, Associate Planner, 253-835-2644, Lei la. Willouphby-Oakes(@,cityoffederalway.com Published in the Federal Way Mirror October 6, 2017 17-102034-00-UP Doc. 1D 75877 City of 300 Parcel Federal Way Notification aWa0 4 2017 rrr%cpm WAIT 0180 15 119600- 0663 N j 119600- > i. 0664 Q 0 119600- 0665 M 119600 1465 19600- 1585 i00- 00 120 160 1 i 1 t. irry nl ELOPMEN I Map Date: 3/2017 City of Federal Way 33325 6th Ave S. Federal Way Wa. 98003 (206) - 835 - 7000 www.cityoffederalway. com - 119600- �9600- 119n00 119600- 119600- 1 119600- 119600- 119600- 0065 1650121 119600-4875 0016 0006 0008 0007 119600- 0125 119600- all _.. _-0075 4870 SW 292ND ST SW 292ND ST 052104- 119600� 119600- ` 9009 119600- 119600- 0840119600= 1025 119�600720250 - 119600- 0875 0856 0825 1010 0130 1020 _ 119600- f 119600- 119600- 0985 f 0857 1015 720250- 119600- 119600- 119600- 119600- 0120 0955 1030 11960 - 0905 1094 119600-1 0855 ? Q 1045 �^ 720250- TRCT T20250- � 0010 119600- 119600- ;11 960.0� 052104- 1300 1305 1355 119600- 1350 Z N 119600- 119600- 1173 1165 119600- 1145 9135 I 119600- 119600- 119600- 119600- 1310 1315 1365 1360 119600- 3265 119600- 119600- 119600- 3905 3780 3760 119600- 3900 1'19600- 119600- 3906 119600-3800 3810 119600- 119600- 1285 1255 11960 - I 3420 _ 1960 1860.0: 3428 3411 a 11960 - 0 3425 Z 19600 19600- N 3450 3438II I_ 11 960- i 3597 119600- 119600 119600- 3740 3600 3590� 11960 119600-3720 3595 11960 - 1240 jI 19601 1225 119600- 3407 119600- 3410 119600- 3412 119600- 3431 119600- 3426 119600- 3585 119600- 0 I �039 052104- 9039 052104- 9039 543720- 0160 U) a 54372U 0010 543721- 0180 I ' 543721- j 0190 Legend CITY of King County Tax Parcels Scale: i Federal Way Property Subject N 0 55 110 Feet 1 Property i I 1 This map is wlcnd¢d for use as a graphical representation only. Notified Properties The City of FeEcrel Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy. M N M (V M N M M N M O M N M N O M N M cV M N M N M M N M �'`� cq N M O) C O M CD N M O M N M N M O M M N N CD O CDC) O O O O O CD CD CD CD O CD O O O O O O O O O O O O O C1 0� 01 Q, U Q\ D1 01 all O1 O� O\ 01 Q1 (7, O\ ON O1 ON � O, a1 a1 ON C� Q ¢ d d00 00¢ d ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ d ¢ ¢ ¢ z ¢ ¢ ¢ Q ¢ ¢ ¢ 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 co Qw.�Q�w¢QwQa �.QaQwQa� Qa.¢�Qw ��aw4awQww�w�w Q awQa¢w Df W w w W W w W w W W w W W w W W W w W W W W W L2 W w p w C] w w w w w w w x w w w w w w Q w w w w w w w w w w w w 0 0 0 N W H (i% w UO d v, X W t�l� �# 3 ccn a [— W �,'„ - H w H w � 3 3 3 can (A � � cn '¢ a, � [�— `3i' `3i' � z W W Ca v' w W `�' > c" w w W W W o W W¢ W W v� W v� w W i. J > > z p > p ¢ x F" > > > > > > > rn > > > > > > > a 12 d Q N c� F" Q> cG H cn Q¢¢¢• Q ¢¢ o¢¢ x Q Q¢ Q d c � (� Ca rn W C] H rn rn rn Z Ca Ca 0 c p Ca N E- F- F� Ca � Ca F- Q N : U) z z N U z N N N Q z z z z z z n cn cn z z z Cl) W N N w N N N N CV N N x^ ° -- N N N^ 3 N N �O N N M Vl kn M O ^ 00 M M M M M M �n N � � ^ _.'c C] a, rn N o rn 0, -- M rn o C, O, Orn O, O, a, O O, Orn rn rn o� rn C, a, v M N N Cl N N N O. N N N N N M N N N M � O C C C O U r� z � = w 0 o o m4) Ca F= wp Z a > X H �+� z ° ° N Z w CL H m �C �a a z w W �� w� w �- N z w z° 2 z Q a w z z z o J ¢�Qw +�- Viz+ a� °LIJ� ti¢ W N w W a w w w > + 0 p Ca z O Q w U p U z z z 2 w x 5 v "' 3¢ z A¢ H w z++ v °+aQ 2z0Um0zW-w�x3w> v Q°z-w Z => h a pqw° 7 cn0 a! J ceO w w z W 3 z U z Z¢¢ z Q .a m W w ¢ 0 C] z O cb Q=� d z Q ¢ W O 0 w 3 z u z cC" zOLL- O z 0 Ca s w w w z ¢ w w �UF-V)w wv)F-zd�7°`,4 U Q 3 Z Q¢¢ a w w o W O a¢-¢ w¢ p w z r3 W O= Us>�3�azmzN .- xwz33Ha w�tUpuo:Gm�z� kn kn W') Vn O kn Wn Vn M W'� O kn to kn W') O Ln O Vn kn O cV O Vn oo ^ oo O kn O 00 M V �O [� N �/'1 W O Vn Vn ,O �D �O O ^ ^ N N N M M kn 00 01 O "t tf Q O O O CD O CD O CD O CD O O O O O O O O O CD O CD O CDO O O O Cl CD J O CD O CD O O O CD O Cl O CD Cl O Cl O O O O O O O O CD O CD O O CD O I�O �O \O �o �O �O \O 110 \O �o �o \O 110 \�O IO 110 I'O �D \O �10 �10 110 �O 110 I'O 1�0 O\ OI Q\ O, O1 z O\ 11 z O\ O� O\ D1 O1 C7, 01 O� O1 C;" O1 O, O1 ON 01 O, r N M'IT U-) (O rl- co m Cl r N M cr LO (O M O M M O r r r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N N M CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Sharma Residence - Stream Buffer Intrusion Project Description: A `Process III' land use review for a requested stream buffer intrusion per Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.145.330. The applicant proposes to intrude into a regulated stream buffer to construct a new single family home. The proposal includes a Stream Buffer Enhancement Plan, prepared by Sewall Wetland Consulting in order to minimize the proposed critical area impacts. Applicant: Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma 253-639-3599 1 sharmarco@yahoo.com Project Location: 2°d Ave. SW & SW 2941' St., Federal Way Parcel #119600-1285 Date Application Received: May 4, 2017 Date Determined Incomplete: June 13, 2017 Date Determined Complete: September 12, 2017 Notice of Application Date: October 6, 2017 Comment Due Date: October 20, 2017 Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File 17-102125-00-UP) and Environmental Third Party Review (File 17-102125-00-AD) Existing Environmental Documents: Critical Areas Designation Report dated May 3, 2017 and Buffer Enhancement Plan, Proposed Sharma Residence dated June 19, 2017 prepared by Sewall Wetland Consulting Inc., Critical Area Map prepared by ESM, dated April 27, 2017, Preliminary Geotechnical Report prepared by Ages Engineering LLC (dated January 4, 2017), and Technical Information Report prepared by AP Consulting, dated July 12, 2017. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19 "Zoning and Development Code." Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments regarding the application to the Community Development Director by 5:00 p.m. on October 20, 2017. Only persons who submit written comments to the director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Availability of File: The official project file and environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Department of Community Development (33325 8d' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003). Staff Contact: Leila W-Oakes, Associate Planner, 253-835-2644, Leila. WiIIou hb -Oakes cit offederalwa .com Published in the Federal Way Mirror October 6, 2017 17-102034-00-UP Doc I D 75877 Leila Willoughby -Oakes From: Peter Lawrence Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 12:40 PM To: 'Arthur Adamov' Cc: Leila Willoughby -Oakes Subject: Meeting notes regarding La Quinta Attachments: Special Inspection Agreement.doc Arthur, Thank you for meeting with me yesterday and providing some clarification regarding the proposed remodel for the La Quinta conversion. Here is the list of items we discussed yesterday. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me directly. 1. Provide complete framing detail for the trellis structure located over the power transformer. Please provide elevation pages for this trellis. 2. Provide complete attachment methods for the trellis at the walk way. Please add details regarding whether you intend on using thru- bolts as an attachment method. Please specify the bolt size. 3. Please provide complete framing detail for the new ramp located in the main lobby. 4. Please provide complete framing details for the glass handrail located at the new ramp. 5. Please make the existing floor plan consistent with the proposed floor plan as shown on page A2. The offices where not clearly identified as existing on the floor plan. 6. Please label all rooms. The room next to the pool entrance was an exercise room. Please identify that room. 7. Please provide complete framing details regarding the new door located in the existing exercise room. Please add that door to the door schedule. 8. Please provide a code compliant egress plan showing the occupant load of the conference rooms, the A-2 assembly and the occupant loads from the upstairs exiting out the door next to the stairway by the storage room. Please provide the required widths of the egress components. 2015 IBC fA] 107.2.3 Means of egress. The construction documents shall show in sufficient detail the location construction sire and character of all ortions of the means of egress includinq the path of the exit discharge to the public waV in compliance with the revisions of this code. In other than occupancies in Groups R-2 R-3 and 1-1 the construction documents shall desi note the number of occupants to be accommodated on ever, loor and in all roams ands aces. 9. Please provide complete exterior wall envelope details to include window flashing, roof to wall flashing, control joints, etc. Please demonstrate compliance with the 2015 IBC section 107.2.4. Provide complete details for the EIFS system. 2015 IBC [A] 107.2.4 Exterior wall envelope. Construction documents for all buildings shall describe the exterior wall envelope in sufficient detail to determine compliance with this rode. The construction documents shallprovide details of the exterior wall envelope as required, including flashing, intersections with dissimilar materials corners end details contral joints, intersections at roof, eaves or parapets, means of drainage, water -resistive membrane and details around openings. The construction documents shall include manufacturer's installation instructions that provide supportinq documentation that the projoosed penetration and opening details described in the construction documents maintain the weather resistance of the exterior wall envelope. The supporting documentation shall fully describe the exterior wall system that was tested where apiolicable, as well as the test procedure used. 10. On page A2 under the general notes we have not adopted the 2010 ADA standards. Please reference the 2009 ICC ANSI 117.1 standards for accessibility. 11. Please provide header details for the new Nano doors. Please include the Nano door specifications. 12. Please provide clearer details for the new storefronts located along the new kitchen and exercise area. Cleary show the existing columns and existing headers over these new storefronts. Please provide complete details for these. 13. Provide specifications as to the type and brand name of the structural foam and provide the ICC ESR report. If you elect to install the plywood and floor joist in the place of the concrete and structural foam then provide complete framing details. If you chose to install the concrete then please omit the % plywood note as shown on page A2 14. The kitchen wall is rated at 1 hour yet there are no UL listed assemblies showing this rated one hour assembly. This is not required to be rated so please remove that note as shown on page A2. 15. Please provide a framing detail for any new walls being attached to the existing 2 hour horizontal assembly and how that rated assembly will be maintained. 16. The new GLB beam is installed up against the 2 hour listed horizontal separation assembly. Provide framing details and a UL listed assembly as to how to provide the fire rating of the GLB at the 2 hour horizontal assembly. Please provide the UL listing in its entirety. The rating for the new GLB and supports is only required to be one hour rated. 17. A new NFPA 13 system shall be installed from grid line A through grid line N and shall go from the lower lobby and the new A2 occupancy to the break room, bathrooms, storage rooms, kitchen, exercise rooms to the exterior East wall. A separate permit and submittals shall be required. Your sprinkler contractor will apply for this permit through South King Fire and Rescue. 18. Please provide a cut sheet for the convection oven so I can determine if a Type I or Type II hood is required. 19. The occupant load of the exercise room should be 13 not 19 as shown. Please revise that occupant load. 20. Please place language on the plans regarding posting of the occupant load for the assembly occupancy, both in the new A-2 and conference rooms. 2015 IBC 1004.3 Posting of occupant load. Every room ors ace that is an ossemblv occupancy shall have the occupant loadof the room ors ace posted in a conspicuous place, near the main exit or exit access doorwa ram the room ors ace. Posted si ns shall be of an approved legible permanent design and shall be maintained by the owner or the owner's awthorized agent. 21. There is a note that refers to the suspended ceiling as shown on page A2 yet that detail is not present. Please provide those details. 22. The notes regarding the new walls being attached to the suspended ceiling system. That is not allowed as the suspended ceiling must move independently of the walls laterally 3/8". Please change that note on page A8. 23. Please provide a detail for any of the cross bracing from the new walls to the horizontal assembly and how the rating will be maintained by the attachment of the cross bracing. 24. Please have the FOR ( engineer of record) evaluate the HDU2 hold-down devices. I did not see in the FOR calculations that those were evaluated. Simpson manufactures specifications require that the HDU2 be connect to minimum 3x members. Please provide details as to how you plan on attaching a full length joist to the inside of the building, and provide a stitching pattern for these multiple members as provided by the designer. If the FOR provides calculations that 3x members are not required per Simpsons installation requirements then provide that information. 25. Please provide the type of joist used for the new framing as shown on page 52.1 detail 3. The structural pages state 2-3x members DF #1 or # 2 and does not mention metal joist type used. Please specify if the 600S studs and joist are 137 or 162 flange type and provide the gauge of the metal joist and studs. (i.e.-6005162-54) 26. How are the new metal floor joist as shown on page 52.1 detail 3 attached to the existing wood wall? Please provide all those framing details. 27. Will the metal floor joist as shown on page S2.1 detail 3 have punch -outs in the joists or will they be solid joist? What will be the fix when one of the HDU2 hold-downs is next to a punch -out. Please address my concerns. 28. What size are the through bolts used for the new (2) GLB's? Please provide that information and whether washers are required. 29. Please provide clearer framing details for the parapet framing as shown page A9. 30. Please show how the roof structure will be ventilated as shown on page 52.1 detail 2. 2 31. 1 have include the special inspection forms that are required to be completed by the designer in responsible charge. Special inspection is required for any on site structural welding, epoxy of anchors and for them to verify that the concrete meets the specifications as required by the FOR in the structural notes. 32. Please continue with your Use Process I application and any additional requirements per the assigned planner. If you have any questions regarding the Use Process I please notify the planner assigned to this project. She can be reached at Leila.willoughby_-oakes@citvoffederalwaV.com. The purpose of this plan review is to verify code compliance, to the extent possible and reasonable, given the information provided on the plans and the city's plan review resources and capabilities. In no way does any city approval constitute a guarantee of code compliance; authorize any work in violation of any applicable codes; or relieve the owner of responsibility for complying with pertinent codes and ordinances. Provide 3 sets of the corrected drawings, and complete a resubmittal form. Plans requiring engineering must be stamped by the engineer and be accompanied by two copies of the engineer's calculations. I will review the resubmittal as expediently as possible. Please provide my comment letter with your written responses. Please cloud any revisions or identify the revision by some other approved means. Further corrections may be necessary as a result of submitting additional information. If you have any questions, please call me at 253-835-2621. Regards, Peter Lawrence Plans Examiner Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2621 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com CITY OF . Federal Way September 28, 2017 17 �1 LCINHALL IALL� 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Avedis Nazarian Emailed: avo.iiazarian@coincast.net 33059 45�h Way South Federal Way, WA 98001-3505 RE: File #17-104366-00-PC; PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE Avo Short Plat, XXXX 45'h Way S., Federal Way (Parcel: 152104-9155) Dear Mr. Nazarian: The Community Development Department is in receipt of your preapplication conference request. The application has been routed to members of the .Development Review Committee and the meeting has been scheduled as follows: 9:00 a.m. — Thursday, October 26, 2017 Hylebos Conference Room Federal Way City Hall, 2nd Floor 33325 Bch Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 We look forward to meeting with you. Please coordinate directly with anyone else you would like to attend the meeting as this will be the only notice sent by the department. If you have any questions regarding the meeting, please contact me at leila.willoua b-oakesfrr7,ci offederalwa _corn or 253-835- 2644. Sincerely, ' 1W Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner Doc I.D. 76605 41k CIT Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8t" Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 11 hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a. allotice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed 2017. Project Na File Numb Signature ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ e-mailed and/or EZ /osted to or at each of the attached addresses on r me V YLA-1-lWam, UU er(s) l Date d I:\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 8/11 /2017 11:46:00 AM Posted Sites: GG,, Federal Way City Hall: 33325 8th Ave South Federal Way Library: 34200 1 st Way South iU (p Federal Way 3201h Library: 848 S. 320th St i,4VQu I:\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 8/11 /2017 11:46:00 AM 0 ar�o 91 lltll f qQs�f�fr Cyr •� '• �'• f Jr���rr�►tttll',���t CD �a CD E� kw R 0 G�j pGnCD o00 ran��'� ar CD m 0�t�i°�� CD CD � - kCD cro CD CD CD N owi sv C'Dc ro CD CD CD rs CD 0 C CD (CD CC0 ❑ y��•• ZCD ''R � G = "p ❑ CD CD PD 0 cn Cr CD 1 C qLw r C rO CD na nU'Q �• o rDCD 0..1 ski CD r 0 �. CD S•q'Q :� �• (]ors k�i CD G Cl Er. CD CD w ao� �z� . CD 0. aC coo CD a jw 3 (o (F r"D m r. -o w. =. � 3 w CD cao I �• Z O `LN3 rD OpDa'^.Ne) E3'cBCD��mo^.�-0, 00 j TVNiC^D� �=,c.,mcwwwp a m 10o.rUv3.•°.K°'cWoccna��`�c�aA IOT �5 o � ID ro .>> o Q o �9 o u� a c O yv1 p^ad0 cif cnw 000�m �D C,9 Nv fD O (-1 7 N N Cho O W O o cD 7 �' a Cncn.iD• O n ID 9' m O ro yarn w wy y y w �'O 0< cn w C . m .-. r pom.. ,*rp0 m rnD�� Dac2oo m-6 D FD+ C �O "11=mO_ QcO p m-- o mww a37c� m to Qm o �a c om�w Dr1M. w —cD �vcn — c7 A' m Nrn� caN �0 3 0 *3 cn o 1� w � w o- o - -_, ern Nm N� ro w w =tgl p' cfl� a w f'1 : coo a� c m �y w a= vNr E3 m a� ao c D d cn� m Wp mT o cn P;om�wc_aW» Z N rDv» < <-D a3 p 3- o cn � -Ve pry rpm 2 mC7a mC O C. y '� c m < O C w c N Q� ,�.' N 01 m a w VJ O Tit < �cmw -3 -O rD vO c-7]_ mac Zvi w-f'1ooa-3Um wo=m-'ncm —m7.c-. ��—a�cw� co m o ..?c-3-•+-• m Oo O c w 3 :mom c= . 3 an N (D O A O Q_ " a O Oa m �•- Q O 3 0 m rrD •O* co > E cfl ' m rc�coc�TCD�mw��cm��oi a w'-' �Np m ^� 3 o cro �1a vc�c Tarr �` —ma y _ Q',a C v 4 cWii CD a vmio_vom cry<? o� CD C) o am ID C w m c�c�a�mw�m�Q. cam:a `C m Q w^c'� w•� �'-oo m'< rD ^CL OrL ter=• co < c> ow wo c'�w �=c'm^� w��.c O� ��� c, o aN o w m a�0. a�`o G a 3 m cw c m �o-� o inn �i 0o c Dw m coi o o•c =t ct 'a p7 m CD CD O m Q O `G Co M. N o d r CITY OF Federal Way October 5, 2017 Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma 317 SW 295th Place Federal Way, WA 98023 shai7T7a' CL Yalioo. CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com FIDE Jim Ferrell, Mayor Re: File #17-102034-00-UP; LETTER OF COMPLETENESS & TECHNICAL COMMENTS Sharma Residence — Process III Stream Buffer Intrusion Request *No Site Address*, 2nd Avenue & SW 294,h Street, Federal Way (Parcel: 119600-1285) Dear Subhash and Shakuntla Sharma: The Department of Community Development has conducted a review of information you submitted in response to the city's June 13, 2017, Notice of Incomplete Application and preliminary technical comments. This review is to determine if the Process III application is complete for the proposed Sharma Stream Buffer Intrusion Request. A third party environmental review of the Buffer Enhancement Plan — Proposed Sharma Residence Qune 19, 2017) and Critical Areas Designation report (May 3, 2017) prepared by Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. is also being processed. The project is being reviewed under the provisions of Federal Way Devised Code (FWRC) 19.70, "Process III Hearing Examiner Review"; and FWRC Title 19, "Critical Areas"; in addition to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The application was deemed incomplete on June 13, 2017. Additional information requested was received by the city on August 29, 2017, and routed to the technical reviewers. The applicant provided a signed third - party task authorization with amended fees on September 25, 2017. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Please consider this correspondence as a Letter of Complete Application. The application is deemed complete as of September 12, 2017, based on a review of your submittal relative to those requirements as set out in FWRC 19.15.W (Bulletin 001). The stream buffer enhancement plan and technical information report/ drainage plan prepared by AE Paul Consulting Quly 12, 2017) was resubmitted to the city on August 29, 2017. This notice of complete application does not represent any form of preliminary approval of the proposed site plan. TECHNICAL COMMENTS The critical areas report has not been evaluated by the city's consultant Landau Associates. Below, please find comments from the city's Building Division and Development Services Division, South King County Fire & Rescue, and Lakehaven Water & Sewer District. Peter Lawrence, Building Division, peter.lawrence(a)cityoffederalway.com, 253-835-2621 The Building Division will commence on the submittal of a complete building permit application. No building permits may be processed by this division until the final issuance of a Process III "Project Approval" Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma Page 2 of 3 October 5, 2017 decision by the Community Development Director. Please contact the Cily of Federal Way Permit Center at )erniit.cen er ci _ offederaiu,ay.com for minimum building permit submittal requirements and checklists. Ann Dower, Development Services Division, agp.dgwer ei offederalwa m, 253-835-2732 Public Works has completed a review of the August 29, 2017, Sharma stream buffer intrusion technical information report submittal. The applicant is required to provide additional information on how, exactly, the roof runoff will be conveyed and where a dispersion pipe, outfall, trench, etc. will be located. 1) Please note the FWRC 19.145.330(3)(a)-(f) states the city may approve a stream buffer intrusion based on the following criteria": • It will not adversely affect water quality; • It will not adversely affect the existing quality of wildlife habitat within the stream or buffer area; • It will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention capabilities; ■ It will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards; • It will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area of the subject property nor to the city as a whole; and • It is necessary for reasonable development of the subject property. The applicant shall describe how the proposal complies the decisional criteria to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director per FWRC 19.145.330(1): "Responses to decisional criteria and design requirements in this section shall be included in the critical areas report." The civil engineer should be responding to review criteria as it pertains to stormwater retention and erosion capabilities of the development proposed, versus the applicant's biologist. 2) The following condition' shall apply to any Process III "Project Approval" decision: The applicant is required to provide frontage improvements along the property frontage(s). Second Avenue SW is a Type W street and should consist of 28 feet of pavement with 4-foot planter strips, 5- foot sidewalks, 3-foot utility strips, streetlighting, and street trees on both sides. The developer is responsible for bringing their frontage into conformance with the FWRC. Alternatively, the applicant may apply for aright -of -way modification, please see enclosed handout. Chris Cahan, South King Fire and Rescue, chris.cahan [c.southkJn €ire.org, 253-946-7243 There are no comments on the land use application. Further comments may apply upon construction plan review. Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, basburz@lakehayen.org As based on the submittal, it appears no existing and/or future Lakehaven water/sewer system facilities will be required, desired, or affected by the proposed land use action. 1 FWRC 19.135.030 17-102034-00-UP Doc- LD. 76542 Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma Page 3 of 3 October 5, 2017 Water There is an existing private water supply line (meter -to -building) that presumably routes west -to -east across an unknown southern portion of the subject property, for the benefit of adjacent parcel 1196001255. This line, and associated private easement, should be identified on the subject property. New water and sewer service for the subject property is accessible from/off existing Lakehaven main lines in 2nd Avenue SW. If any water or sewer utility conflicts are encountered, the applicant should promptly contact Lakehaven for additional information. Please depict any proposed utility installations and improvements in the wetland and stream critical areas and regulated buffers. Such improvements shall be evaluated under the current Use Process III for the requested stream buffer intrusion. PUBLIC NOTICE Having met the submittal requirements, a Notice of Application (NOA) will be published in the Federal Way Mirror, posted on site, posted on the City's official notice boards and mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property on Friday, October 6, 2017. The city will be responsible for posting public notice boards on the subject property. CLOSING A 120-day time line for reviewing the Process III application has started, as of September 12, 2017. The city's development regulations allow the department 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. A Process III decision on the application will be issued within 97 days of this letter (23 days have elapsed from application completeness). However, the 120-day time line will be stopped any time the city requests corrections and/or additional information. You will be informed of the status of the 120-day time line when you are notified in writing that corrections and/or additional information are needed. A complete set of Planning Division and third party biologist comments shall be sent under a separate cover approximately two to four weeks of this letter. Any resubmittals for this application must be accompanied with a resubmittal form and in person. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please contact me at 253-835-2644, or leila.,,villoughby-oakes(u cityoffederalway,�om. Sincerely, 9&,f �_741� Leila Willoughby-O c s Associate Planner c: Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner enc: Notice of Application Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Examiner Resubmittal Form Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue ROW Modification Bulletin Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer FWRC 19.145.330, "Stream Buffer Intrusion Criteria" Ed Sewall, Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc., s Lakehaven Enclosures 17-102034-00-UP Doc. 4D. 76542 RECEIVED Lakehaven WATER & SEWER DISTRICT MAY 0 4 2017 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SEWER + TrFI+CA l-ABILIT- V Lakehaven Water & Sewer District - Development Engineering Section 31623 - 1st Ave S * PO Box 4249 * Federal Way, WA 98063-4249 Telephone: 253-945-1581 or 253-945-1580 * Email: DE@Lakehaven.org This certificate is intended to provide the applicant, land use agencies &/or public health departments with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay, or deny, sewer service based upon capacity &/or supply limitations in Lakehaven's or Other Purveyor's system facilities. Proposed Land Use: ® Building Permit-SFR ❑ Building Permit-MFR ❑ Building Permit -Other ❑ Subdivision ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Binding Site Plan ❑ Rezone ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Other (specify/describe) Tax Parcel Number(s): 1196001285 Site Address: 293XX - 2nd Ave SW Lakehaven GIS Grid: H-05 Ex. Bldg. Area to Remain: N/A sf New Bldg. Area Proposed: UNKNOWN sf Applicant's Name: Sharma SEWER SYSTEM INFORMATION 1. ® Sewer service can be provided by service connection to an existing 8" diameter sewer main that is approximately 0+ - feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed land use. 2. ❑ Sewer service for the site will require an Improvement to Lakehaven's sanitary sewer system of: ❑ a. feet of " diameter sewer main or trunk to reach the site; and/or ❑ b. The construction of a sanitary sewer collection system on the site; and/or ❑ c. A major portion of Lakehaven's comprehensive wastewater system plan would need to be implemented and/or constructed; and/or ❑ d. Other (describe): 3. ® a. The existing sewer system is in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan. ❑ b. The existing sewer system is not In conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan and an Amendment to this Plan will be required. This may cause a delay in issuance of land use approvals or permits. 4. ® a. The proposed site land use is within the corporate limits of Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of sewer service outside of Lakehaven's sewer service area. ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. S. Sewer service is subject to: ® a. Payment of connection charges (to be determined by Lakehaven); ® b. Proof or reservation of easement(s) as required by Lakehaven (if east connection, private on parcel 1196001255); ® c. Other: Sewer Service Connection Permit reguired. Comments/special conditions: The prop-erty does not have a previous or existing sewer service conngctign. I hereby certify that the above sewer system information is true. This certification shall be valid for one (1) year from the date of signature. Name: BRIAN ASBURY Title: DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR Signature: Date: ! 1196001285 swr.docx (Form Update 1/3/17) Page 1 of 2 119MOI173 1190001185 135 115 Lt b u O w ? 119NO1285 � 4 1 980012-- 11e "PVC TH S - Q 1196003428 119M 03420 11 03411 29414 29408 rE_ Lakehar►en Water and Act nether warrants nor gua accuracy of any facility info tided. Facility locations and ca subject to field verf is ation. Sewer C er iflcate of Availability Parcel 1196001295 0 30 s0 Feet 5/3/2017 BIA 1196001285 swr.docx (Form Update 1/3/17) Page 2 of 2 WATER CERTIFICATE OF AVAILABILITY Lakehaven Water & Sewer District - Development Engineering Section 31623 - 1st Ave S * PO Box 4249 * Federal Way, WA 98063-4249 Telephone: 253-945-1581 or 253-945-1580 * Email: DE@Lakehaven.org This certificate is intended to provide the applicant, land use agencies &/or public health departments with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay, or deny, water service based upon capacity &/or supply limitations in Lakehaven's or Other Purveyor's system facilities. Proposed Land Use: ® Building Permit-SFR ❑ Building Permit-MFR ❑ Building Permit -Other ❑ Subdivision ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Binding Site Plan ❑ Rezone ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Other (specify/describe) Tax Parcel Number(s): 1196001285 Site Address: 293XX - 2nd Ave SW Lakehaven GIs Grid: H-05 Ex. Bldg. Area to Remain: N sf New Bldg. Area Proposed: UNKNOWN sf Applicant's Name: Sharma WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION 1. ® Water service can be provided by service connection to an existing 8" diameter water main that is approximately 65+/- feet from the site. 2. ❑ Water service for the site will require an Improvement to Lakehaven's water distribution system of: ❑ a. feet of " diameter water main to reach the site; and/or ❑ b. The construction of a water distribution system on the site; and/or ❑ c. A major portion of Lakehaven's comprehensive water system plan would need to be implemented and/or constructed; and/or ❑ d. Other (describe): 3. ® a. The existing water system is in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Water System Plan. ❑ b. The existing water system is not in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Water System Plan and an Amendment to this Plan will be required. This may cause a delay in issuance of land use approvals or permits. 4. ® a. The subject property is within the cor-paratr. limits of Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of water service outside of Lakehaven's water service area. ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. S. Water service is subject to: ® a. Payment of connection charges (to be determined by Lakehaven); ® b. Proof or reservation of easement(s) as required by Lakehaven (private, for benefit of parcel 1196001255); ® c. Other: Water Service_ C_Qnnect&Lapplication reauircd. Comments/special conditions: The nearest fire hydrant is approximately 70+ - feet from the Property (as marked on map on the back of this page). Fire Flow at no less than 20 psi available within the water distribution system is 1.000 GPM (approximate) for two (2) hours or more. This flow figure depicts the theoretical performance of the water distribution system under high demand conditions. Fire flow rates greater than this may be accommodated through water distribution system Improvements, contact Lakehaven for additional information. 420 Pressure Zone Est. Meter Elevation(s)-GIS: 114+/- Est. Pressure Range at Meter(s) (psi): 130-132 I hereby certify that the above water system information is true. This certification shall be valid for one (1) year from the date of signature. Name: BRIAN ASBURY Title: DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR Signature: ���f Date: 1196001285 wtr.docx (Form Update 1/3/17) Page 1 of 2 0. 0 11960 1350 29 9 1196001173 1196401165 135 115 13110 1198001 40 110 {� 9195001255 119WO1255 4 116 Q w Ex. WtrSvc/Meter for Parcel 1196001255 Ex. Location of Water Supply a Hydrant (meter -to -house) Unknown 04 1196003428 1798003407 29414 29401 Q0 119WO3411 119B003420 29409 11 0 1190003410 29411 ROTE : Lakehaven Water and Sewer Water Certificate of Availability District neither warrants nor guaranteesthe accuracy of any facility information c Parcel 1196001285 40 soavided. Ncilky locations and conditions are subject tofieldverification. e 5/3/2017 BIA 1196001285 wtr.docx (Form Update 1/3/17) Page 2 of 2 CITY OF ti. Federal Way June 13, 2017 �iF ILL; CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Subhash and Shakuntla Sharma Email: sharmarco r vahoo.com 317 SW 295"' Place Federal Way, WA 98023 RE: File #17-102125-00-UP; NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION Sharma Stream Buffer Intrusion, 2"" Avenue & SW 294"' Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. & Mrs. Sharma: The Department of Community Development has conducted a cursory review of information you submitted to the City on May 4, 2017, in order to determine if the application is complete for the proposed Sharma Stream Buffer Intrusion for anew single family residence. The project is being reviewed under the provisions of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.65, "Use Process III — Project Approval" and FWRC 19.145.330 "Intrusions into stream buffers." City planning staff provided you with information regarding the submittal and review process for a stream buffer intrusion request in April 2017. Planning Manager Robert Hansen and Associate Planner Leila Willoughby -Oakes met with you on May 26, 2017, to assist you with the permitting process. INCOMPLETE APPLICATION During the course of the city's review, the following items were found to be missing or incomplete per the enclosed Bulletin #001 Use Process III Submittal Checklist. in order for your application to be considered complete and ready for processing, the items below must be provided. ■ Preliminary Drainage, Grading and Right -of -Way Plan — The applicant will need to provide a viable drainage plan for the home meeting 2016 King County Sznface Water Design Standards (Appendix C) so that staff can evaluate whether there will be any additional intrusions into the stream buffer. ■ Special Studies and Additionallnforrnation (three copies required) — Provide a critical areas report with supplemental information including a stream buffer enhancement plan pursuant to FWRC 19.145.330(2)(a)-(e). The enhancement shall be monitored, as a stream buffer intrusion may be permitted with said plan, but must demonstrate that the remaining and enhanced reduced buffer will function at an equivalent or higher level than the standard regulated stream buffer. As such, your proposal is subject to general performance and maintenance bonds per FWRC 19.145.100 for a duration accepted by the city's third party consultant Landau Associates. PRELIMiNARv TECHNICAL COMMENTS Since the application is incomplete and the critical areas have not been evaluated, a comprehensive technical review of the proposal has not been conducted. Other city department comments will follow under separate cover. A complete technical review of the Process IIi stream buffer intrusion request will occur after the critical area studies are submitted to the City, and reviewed and approved by City staff and their consultants. Y1r. Sharma .tune 13. 2017 Pate 2 of 2 • Critical Area Peer Review— The applicant shall return a signed task authorization with environmental fees, paid by check or card to the Permit Center (253-835-2607). The application will remain on hold until the receipt of review fees. • Critical Area Setbacks — All plan -sets shall depict a 5-ft. setback from the edge of the stream, wetland and/or geologically hazardous area buffers, unless otherwise approved. • Critical Area Signs — Development proposals approved by the city shall require that the boundary between a critical area bluffer and contiguous land shall be identified with permanent signage. Please depict the signage type as an inset on the plans. Signs must be posted at an interval of one per lot. • Permanent Fencing— Permanent fencing shall be required at the outer edge of the critical area buffer as a buffer reduction is employed as part of this proposal and as the fencing shall protect the values and functions of the existing stream, preventing further unperinitted encroachments (FWRC 19.145.180.3(b) and (d). * Notice on Title— If the stream buffer intrusion is approved, at the expense of the applicant, you are required to record the final Use Process III site plan and attach a notice on title. Please see the enclosed critical area restrictive covenant (FWRC 19.145.150). • Welland— The applicant shall depict the small slope type scrub shrub wetland and the extents of the proposed wetland buffer located along the southeast corner of the site on the east site of the stream. • Off -site Wetlands — The applicant's biologist shall evaluate if wetlands exist on or within 225 feet of the subject property. If any wetlands exist within 225-ft please show, rate, estimate acreage and score the wetland - showing any buffers on the plans (FWRC 19.145.410 (f)). Any resubmittals for this application must be accompanied with a green resubmittal form. After receipt of the requested information noted in the incomplete application section of this letter, the department will notify you within 14 days whether your application is considered complete or what, if any, information is still needed. The review clock for processing your formal application will not begin until all items are submitted. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please contact me at 253-835-2644, or leila.willou(rhby-oakes@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerejy, eila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Examiner enc: Restrictive Covenant Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue Bulletin #001 Use Process III Submittal Requirements Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer Redlined Critical Area Site Plan Ed Sewall, Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc., Emailed: rsch�a[lFi st►rx[I�se.com Resubmittal Form Wetland/Stream analysis reports and geotechnical reports submitted to the City as part of a land use application may receive a third -party peer review at the discretion ofthe Community Development Department, and at the applicant's expense (FWRC 19.145.080.3). The city has established this is required and provided a contract and scope of work with the city's on -call environmenlznl consultant. For this proposal, a peer review is required for both welland/stream delineation, classification and analysis, stream buffer enhancement plan review and for a geologically hazardous area analysis. We forwarded a peer review cost and task authorization form for vour signature on May 2, 2017. 17-IO2-0.34-00-UP Doc I D 7559 CITY OF Federal Way CRITICAL AREA REPORT PEER REVIEW Date: May 15, 2017 Consultant: Steve Quarterman Landau Associates Inc. 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 Project: 2nd Ave. SW & SW 294' Street *No Site Address* Parcel: 119600-1285 File: 17-102125-00-AD Related File(s): 17-102034-00-UP Zoning: RS9.6 —1 Unit/9,600 square feet Project Proponents: Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma 317 SW 295"' Place Federal Way, WA 98023 Email: sharmarcoCa7)yahoo.com Project Planner: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Associate Planner leila.willou hb -oakes cit offederalwa .com, (253) 835-2644 Project Background: The applicant is interested in developing a 0.39-acre site, which contains a stream (classified as fish -bearing) and erosion hazard areas. Prior to processing a Use Process III `Director's Approval' for a proposed stream buffer intrusion, review of the stream/wetland delineation report is required to establish the buildable area, mitigation sequencing, and a buffer enhancement plan. Documents Provided: • Critical Areas Designation Report, prepared by Sewall (report date: May 3, 2017) • Site Plan, prepared by Urban Development Inc. (survey stamped: May 2, 2017) • Critical Area Plan, prepared by ESM (stamped March 22, 2017) Task Scope: . Lots of Record Survey, prepared by Crones & Associates (September 2003) 1. Review the stream/wetland delineation and associated data for consistency with the requirements of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.145, `Environmentally Critical Areas," especially: a. Article IV Chapter 19.145, "Wetlands" b. Article III Chapter 19.145, "Fish and Wildlife Conservation Areas," particularly FWRC 19.145.330 "Intrusion into stream buffers" c. FWRC 19.145.130, "Mitigation sequencing" and FWRC 19.145.140, "Mitigation plan requirements" Critical Areas Consultant Authorization Form Stream Delineation/17-1012125-AD Page 1 Task Cost: r 2. Conduct site visit as necessary. 3. Provide written response to findings, recommendations, and request additional information from applicant if needed. 4. Possible meeting with applicant's wetland biologist. 5. Review of resubmitted/corrected documents as needed. 6. Project management as necessary if additional land use review is required. PJ�A<,e A Wopt sC `i n �t f Cf2. Not to exceed $3,360.00 without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. 9/.2-T -1r Federal Way (Associate Planner Leila Willoughby -Oakes) Consultant (Steve Quarterman, Landau Associates Inc.) Applicant (Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma) Date Date Date Figure 1. City of Federal Way Critical Areas Map, September 2012 Source: htt :1/wa-federalway.civic lus.eom/DocumentCenter/Home/View/460 Critical Areas Consultant Authorization Form Stream Delineation/17-1012125-AD Page 2 Leila Willoughby -Oakes From: Steve Quarterman <suarterman@landauinc.com> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 1:15 PM To: Leila Willoughby -Oakes Subject: RE: UP III Parcel: 1196000-1285 Leila, I received your voicemail from Friday regarding the peer review for the critical areas report for the Sharma development. Unfortunately we currently do not have an authorized contract with the City as our third party review contract expired at the end of June. We have been in contact with Doc Hansen to renew the contract. Steven Quarterman Landau Associates Ext. 121 Direct: (425) 329-0321 From: Leila Willoughby -Oakes [mailto:Leila.Willoughby-Oakes@cityoffederalway.com] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 4:02 PM To: Steve Quarterman <suarterman@landauinc.com> Subject: RE: UP III Parcel: 1196000-1285 Hi Steve, Thanks. I believe no meeting is required with the applicant's biologist, however a site visit would be necessary and review of the resubmitted/corrected documents. I expect there will be corrections based on my review. Cheers, Leila L. Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2644 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.c ityoff ed era I way.co rn From: Steve Quarterman [mailto:squarterman@landauinc.com] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:07 PM To: Leila Willoughby -Oakes Subject: RE: UP III Parcel: 1196000-1285 Leila, we can reduce cost to $3,360 assuming no review of resubmitted/corrected documents and no meeting with applicant's wetland biologist. Let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss further. Steven Quarterman Landau Associates Ext. 121 Direct: (425) 329-0321 From: Leila Willoughby -Oakes [maiIto: Leila. Willoughby -Oa kes@cityoffederalway.com] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 9:15 AM To: Steve Quarterman <scluarterman@landauinc.com> Subject: FW: UP III Parcel: 1196000-1285 Hi Steve, Mr. Sharma has a question regarding peer review cost. With thanks, Leila L. Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner tnr Q. Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2644 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.citvoffedera IwaY.com From: subhash Sharma [maiito:sharmarco@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 6:58 PM To: Leila Willoughby -Oakes Subject: Re: UP III Parcel: 1196000-1285 I have paid for the Geo tech report and have submitted with the application. As I see I have to pay again. As I understand only Seawall report need validation by 2ndparty per requiremnts. Please see if Landu associate can reduce their work statement and reduce price they are asking. Thanks -Subhash C. Sharma On May 24, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Leila Willoughby -Oakes <Leila.Willou hb -Oakes cit offederalwa .com> wrote: Mr. Sharma, Further to my last email reasonable size house would be a building footprint up to 1,600 sq. ft., including garage, limited to the 30-foot (above average building elevation) height maximum. As proposed, your current design is larger especially, the overall house footprint will need to be reduced. The improvements and utilities would need to be placed as far away from the stream buffer wetland as possible. The driveway would not be included in the building footprint, but you may be limited to one access off of 2"d, as a second access as described in the preliminary geotechnical report would be located in the stream buffer. With thanks, Leila W-Oakes L. Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner <image001Jpg> 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2644 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.ci offederalwa .com From: Leila Willoughby -Oakes Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:03 AM To: 'sharmarco ahoo.com' Subject: UP III Parcel: 1196000-1285 Good morning Mr. and Mrs. Sharma, I gather you have met with my colleague Stacey Welsh on your proposed buffer intrusion? I have been assigned your stream buffer intrusion request/ Are you available to meet? I think this will be beneficial for the efficiency of your permit processing, and useful to clarify city code requirements. Mitigating impact/a buffer enhancement plan on the subject property for the stream buffer will be the quickest way forward. We can discuss the requirements and building envelope you propose and discuss the reasonable use evaluation criteria. Your report will be peer reviewed by our on call consultant, please also submit a geotechnical report (did you submit one). You will need one (you may choose to have this peer reviewed ahead of time to expedite the process) I am available Friday mornings from 7:30 to 12:30 pm. Please let me know if you have any questions. A review letter and task authorization to commence the wetland biologist peer review will arrive shortly (1-2 weeks). Kind regards, Leila L. Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner <image001 Jpg> 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Fire-erican Twe Insurance company 818 art St, Ste 8a0 Seattle, vva 98101 Phn - (206)728-0400 (800)826-7718 Fax - ESCROW COMPANY INFORMATION: Escrow Officer/Closer: AMY TITIALII atitialii@firstam.com First American Title Insurance Company 33600 Sixth Ave S, Ste 105, Federal Way, WA 98003 Phone: (253)874-0400 - Fax: (866)235-1757 King County Title Team 818 Stewart St, Ste. 800, Seattle, WA 98101 Fax No. (866) 904-2177 Fax No. (866) 561-3729 E-WLF TIT LEIC.iNGWA0firstalm.cam Pat Fullerton (206) 615-3055 Kelly Cornwall (206) 336-0725 Jennifer Salas (206) 615-3011 Peter Child (206) 336-0726 Curtis Goodman (206) 615-3069 Municipality Title Officer To: Keller Williams Realty Puget Sound 33434 8th Avenue, Suite 103 Federal Way, WA 98003 Attn: John Clawson Kathy J. Turner (206) 336-0724 File No.: 4204-2759342 Customer Reference: 116 SW 294th St, Federal Way, WA 98023 Re: Property Address: 116 SW 294th St, Federal Way, WA 98023 FirstAmedcan Tide Form No. 1068-2 �~@itment No.: 4204-2759342 ALTA Plain Language Commitment �� Page 2 of 10 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by FIRSTAMERICAN TITLEINSURANCE COMPANY Agreement to Issue Policy We agree to issue a policy to you according to the terms of this Commitment. When we show the policy amount and your name as the proposed insured in Schedule A, this Commitment becomes effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A. If the Requirements shown in this Commitment have not been met within six months after the Commitment bate, our obligation under this Commitment will end. Also, our obligation under this Commitment will end when the Policy is issued and then our obligation to you will be under the Policy. Our obligation under this Commitment is limited by the following: The Provisions in Schedule A. The Requirements in Schedule B-I. The General Exceptions and Exceptions in Schedule B-II. The Conditions. This Commitment is not valid without Schedule A and Section I and II of Schedule B. First American Title Insurance Company 61 Pat Fullerton, Title Officer FirstAmedcan Tide Form No. 1068-2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment C -ment No.: 4204-2759342 Page 3 of 10 SCHEDULE A 1. Commitment Date: October 10, 2016 at 7:30 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: AMOUNT PREMIUM TAX Basic Rate Standard Owner's Policy $ 55,500.00 $ 680.00 $ 65.28 Proposed Insured: Subhash C. Sharma, presumptively subject to the community interest of his spouse, if married 3. (A) The estate or interest in the land described in this Commitment is: Fee Simple (B) Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: LUCIAN IONESCU AND PERRONELA IONESCU, HUSBAND AND WIFE 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: Real property in the County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: The land referred to in this report is described in Exhibit A attached hereto. FirstAmerican Title Form No. 1068-2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment -• tTnent No.: 4204-2759342 Page 4 of 10 SCHEDULE B SECTION I REQUIREMENTS The following requirements must be met: (A) Pay the agreed amounts for the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured. (B) Ray us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. (C) Documents satisfactory to us creating the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured must be signed, delivered and recorded: (D) You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions. (E) Releases(s) or Reconveyance(s) of Item(s): (F) Other: (G) You must give us the following information: 1. Any off record leases, surveys, etc. 2. Statement(s) of Identity, all parties. 3. Other: SCHEDULE B SECTION II GENERAL EXCEPTIONS PART ONE: A. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. B. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. C. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. D. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. E. (A) Unpatented mining claims; (B) Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (C) Water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not the matters excepted under (A), (B) or (C) are shown by the public records; (D) Indian Tribal Codes or Regulations, Indian Treaty or Aboriginal Rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. F. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or materials or medical assistance heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, construction, tap or reimbursement charges/costs for sewer, water, garbage or electricity. H. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof, but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the escrow or interest or mortgage(s) thereon covered by this Commitment. FirstAmerican Tide Form No. 1068-2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment ,fitment No.: 4204-2759342 Page 5 of 10 SCHEDULE B SECTION II EXCEPTIONS PART TWO: Any policy we issue will have the following exceptions unless they are taken care of to our satisfaction. The printed exceptions and exclusions from the coverage of the policy or policies are available from the office which issued this Commitment. Copies of the policy forms should be read. 1. Lien of the Real Estate Excise Sales Tax and Surcharge upon any sale of said premises, if unpaid. As of the date herein, the excise tax rate for the City of Federal Way is at 1.78 %. Levy/Area Code: 1205 2. Taxes which may be assessed and extended on any subsequent roll for the tax year 2016, with respect to new improvements and the first occupancy which may be included on the regular assessment roll and which are an accruing lien not yet due or payable. 3. Facility Charges, if any, including but not limited to hook-up, or connection charges and latecomer charges for sewer, water and public facilities of Federal Way Water and Sewer District as disclosed by instrument recorded under recording no. 8803310669. 4. According to the application for title insurance, title is to vest in Subhash C. Sharma. If said party(ies) is/are married and we are to insure title as such, free of any interest of the spouse(s), we will require a deed of conveyance from the non -participating spouse(s). According to the application for title insurance, the purchase price in the proposed transaction is less than the assessed valuation of the property. The COUNTY will require documentation that the purchase price is a bona fide offer. Said documentation may be in the form of a copy of the Purchase and Sale Agreement AND MUST BE SENT IN WITH THE RECORDING PACKAGE. Purchase Price: $ 55,500.00 Assessed Value: $ 115,000.00 6. Potential lien rights as a result of labor and/or materials used, or to be used, for improvements to the premises. The Company reserves the right to make additional requirements prior to insuring. An indemnity agreement to be completed by Lucian Ionescu and Perronela Ionescu, is being sent to The Closing Escrow Company and must be submitted to us prior to closing for our review and approval. All other matters regarding extended coverage have been cleared for mortgagee's policy. Items A through E and G and H on Exhibit B herein will be omitted in said extended coverage mortgagee's policy. The coverage contemplated by this paragraph will not be afforded in any forthcoming owner's standard coverage policy to be issued. 7. Any and all offers of dedication, conditions, restrictions, easements, boundary discrepancies or encroachments, notes and/or provisions shown or disclosed by Short Plat or Plat of Buenna Addition recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, Page(s) 29. 8. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: 6245218 For: Driveway and utility purposes FkstAmerican Tide Form No. 1066-2 i'ment No.: 4204-2759342 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page 6 of 10 9. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: 7602130712 In Favor of: Lakehaven Sewer District, a Municipal Corporation For: Sewer mains with appurtenances thereto FirstAmerican Tide Form No.1068-2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment *ment No.: 4204-2759342 Page 8 of 10 CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS (a)"Mortgage" means mortgage, deed of trust or other security instrument. (b)"Public Records" means title records that give constructive notice of matters affecting the title according to the state law where the land is located. 2. LATER DEFECTS The Exceptions in Schedule B - Section II may be amended to show any defects, liens or encumbrances that appear for the first time in the public records or are created or attached between the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Requirements (a) and (c) of Schedule B - Section I are met. We shall have no liability to you because of this amendment. 3. EXISTING DEFECTS If any defects, liens or encumbrances existing at Commitment Date are not shown in Schedule B, we may amend Schedule B to show them. If we do amend Schedule B to show these defects, liens or encumbrances, we shall be liable to you according to Paragraph 4 below unless you knew of this information and did not tell us about it in writing. 4. LIMITATION OF OUR LIABILITY Our only obligation is to issue to you the Policy referred to in this Commitment, when you have met its Requirements. If we have any liability to you for any loss you incur because of an error in this Commitment, our liability will be limited to your actual loss caused by your relying on this Commitment when you acted in good faith to: comply with the Requirements shown in Schedule B - Section I or eliminate with our written consent any Exceptions shown in Schedule B - Section II. We shall not be liable for more than the Policy Amount shown in Schedule A of this Commitment and our liability is subject to the terms of the Policy form to be issued to you. 5. CLAIMS MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT Any claim, whether or not based on negligence, which you may have against us concerning the title to the land must be based on this commitment and is subject to its terms. cc: Subhash C. Sharma cc: Lucian Ionescu and Petronela Ionescu FirstAmeddan Tide Form No.1068-2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment `ment No.: 4204-2759342 Page 9 of 10 . .rr. FirstAmerican First American ode FirstAmerican Ttle Insurance Company 818 Stewart St, Ste 800 Seattle, WA 98101 Phn - (206)728-0400 (800)826-7718 Fax - Privacy Information We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain Information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with such information - particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our subsidiaries we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information that you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source, such as Information obtained from a public retard or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted b:uader guidelines that govern our use of personal information regardless of its source. First American cells these guidelines its Fair Information Values. Types of information Depending upon which of our mrvlces you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal Information that we may collect include: ■ Infornation we receive from you on applications, forms and In other communications to us, whether In writing, In person, by telephone or any other means; ■ Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and ■ Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of information We request Information firm you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therekxe, we will not release your Information to nomffillated parties except: (1) as necessary far us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information Indefinitely, including the period after which any customer re ationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any Internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide ail of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such Wfillated companies include financial service providers, such as title Insurers, property and casualty Insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies Involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companles and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide all the Information we collect as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies or to other financial Institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have jolnt marketing agreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those Individuals and entities who need W know that Information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employers and agents to ensure that your Information will be handled responsibly and In accordance with this Privacy Policy and First Amerimn's Fair Information Values. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal Information. Information Obtained Through Our Web5ibe First American Financial Corporation is sensitive: to privacy issues on the Internet. We believe it is important you know how we treat the infom ation about you we receive on the Internet. In general, you can visit Fast American or its affillates' Web sites on the World Wide web without telling us who you are or revealing any information about yourself. Our Web servers collect the domain names, not the a -mall addresses, of visnurs. This information is aggregated to measure the number of visits, average time spent on the site, pages NewEd and similar information. First American uses this information to measure the use of our site and to develop Ideas to Improve the content of our site. There are times, however, when we may need Information from you, such as your name and email address. When Information is needed, we will use cur Gent efforts to let you know at cite time of collection haw we will use the personal Information. Usually, the personal Information we collect is used only by us to respond to your inquiry, process an order or allow you to access specific armuntiprofl3e lnformadon. If you choose W share any permrsal Information with us, we will only use It in accordance with the policies outlined above. Business Relationships First American Flnandal Corporation's site and its affiliates' sites may contain links to other Web sites. While we try to link only to sites that share our high standards and respect for privacy, we are not responsible for the content or the privacy practices employed by other sites. Cookies Some of First American's Web sites may make use of "cookie" technology to measure site activity and to customize information to your personal tastes. A cookie Is an element of data that a Web site can send to your browser, which may then store the cookie on your hard drive. nmtAm.com uses stared cookies. The goal of this technology is to better serve you when visiting our site, save you time when you are here and to provide you with a more meaningful and productive Web site experience. Fair Information Values Fairness We consider consumer expectations about their privacy in all our businesses. We only offer products and services that assure a favorable balance between consumer benefits and consumer priva. Public Record We believe that an open public record creates significant value for society, enhances consumer choice and creates consumer opportunity. We actively support an open public record and emphasize its importance and contribution to our economy. Use We believe we should behave responsibly when we use Information about a consumer in our business. We will obey the laws governing the collection, use and dissemination of data. Accuracy We will take rmsonat] a steps to help assure the accuracy a the data we collect, use and Ossem€nat>e. Where possible, we will take reasonable steps to correct Inaccurate Information. When, as with the public record, we cannot correct inaccurate information, we will take all reasonable steps to assist consumers in Identifying the source of the erroneous data so that the consumer can secure the required corrections. Education We endeavor to educate the users of our products and services, our employees and others In our industry about the importance of consumer privacy. We will instruct our employees on our fair Information values and on the responsible collection and use of data. We will encourage others in our industry to collect and use Information In a responsible manner. Security We will maintain appropriate facilities and systems to protect against unauthorized access to and corruption of the data we maintain. Form 50-PRIVACY (9/1/10) Page 1 of 1 Privacy Information (2001-2010 First American Financial Corporation) First American Tide Form No. 1068-2 '") rent No.: 4204-2759342 ALTA Plain Language Commitment Page 10 of 10 FIRSTAMERICAN TITLEINSURANCE COMPANY Exhibit "A" Vested Owner: LUCIAN IONESCU AND PERRONELA IONESCU, HUSBAND AND WIFE Real property in the County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: LOTS 29, 30, 31 AND 32, BLOCK 15, BUENNA ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 29, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH 40 FEET OF SOUTHWEST 294TH STREET, AS VACATED BY DECREE ENTERED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 669986. Tax Parcel Number: 119600128506 Situs Address: 116 SW 294th St, Federal Way, WA 98023 FIrstAmeriran Tide A W = r owner's Policy of Title insurance First American I ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company POLICY NUMBER 5011453-2759342 Owner's Policy _ - --- - - - - - - Any notice of claim and any other notice or the Conditions. statement Section 113 oiwriting be given to the Company under this policy must be given to the Company at the address shown re COVERED RISKS 5UB3ECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B, AND THE CONDITIONS, Neraska corration (the "Company") insures, a�; of Date of policy and, to the FIRST AMoERIeCAN TrrLE INSU after CE Date of oANY, a nstloss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance, sustained or incurred byextent stated In dRisks 9 and Insured by reason of: 1. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A. 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title. This Covered Risk includes but is not limited to insurance against loss from (a) A defect in the Tide caused by (1) forgery, fraud, undue influence, duress, incompetency, incapacity, or impersonation; (i[) failure of any person or Entity to have authorized a transfer or conveyance; notarized, or delivered; (iii) a document affecting Title not property created, executed, witnessed, sealed, acknowledged, (iv) failure to perform those acts necessary to create a document by electronic means authorized by law; (v) a document executed under a falsified, expired, or otherwise invalid power of attorney; (vi) a document not properly filed, recorded, or indexed in the Public Records including failure to perform those acts by electronic means authorized by law; or (vii) a defective judicial or administrative proceeding. (b) The lien of real estate taxes or assessments imposed on the Title by a governmental authority due or payable, but unpaid. (c) Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. The term "encroachment" includes encroachments of existing improvements located on the Land onto adjoining land, and encroachments onto the Land of existing improvements located on adjoining land. 3. Unmarketable Title. 4. No right of access to and from the Land. (Covered Risks Continued on Page 2) In Witness Whereof, First American Title Insurance Company has caused its corporate name to be hereunto affixed by its authorized officers as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A. First American Title Insurance Company (This Policy is valid only when Schedules A and B are attached) This ]acket was created electronically and constitutes an original document Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association Form 5011453 (7-1-14) ',Page 1 of 8 ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (6- COVERED RISKS (Continued) 5. The violation or enforcement of any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (a) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (b) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (c) the subdivision of land; or (d) environmental protection if a notice, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records setting forth the violation or intention to enforce, but only to the extent of the violation or enforcement referred to in that notice. 6. An enforcement action based on the exercise of a governmental police power not covered by Covered Risk 5 if a notice of the enforcement action, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records, but only to the extent of the enforcement referred to in that notice. 7. The exercise of the rights of eminent domain if a notice of the exercise, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records. S. Any taking by a governmental body that has occurred and is binciing on the rights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge. 9. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A or being defective (a) as a result of the avoidance in whole or in part, or from a court order providing an alternative remedy, of a transfer of all or any part of the title to or any interest in the Land occurring prior to the transaction vesting Title as shown in Schedule A because that prior transfer constituted a fraudulent or preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state Insolvency, or similar creditors' rights taws; or (b) because the instrument of transfer vesting Title as shown in Schedule A constitutes a preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws by reason of the failure of its recording in the Public Records (i) to be timely, or (ii) to impart notice of its existence to a purchaser for value or to a judgment or lien creditor. 10. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title or other matter included in Covered Risks 1 through 9 that has been created or attached or has been filed or recorded in the Public Records subsequent to Date of Policy and prior to the recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred in defense of any matter insured against by this Policy, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions. EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of; 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. Form 5011453 (7-1-14) •.Page 2 of 8 ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (6-17-06)i Washington CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS The following terms when used in this policy mean: (a) "Amount of Insurance": The amount stated in Schedule A, as may be increased or decreased by endorsement to this policy, increased by Section 8(b), or decreased by Sections 10 and 11 of these Conditions. (b) "Date of Policy": The date designated as "Date of Policy" in Schedule A. (c) "Entity": A corporation, partnership, trust, limited liability company, or other similar legal entity. (d) "Insured": The Insured named in Schedule A. (i) The term "Insured" also includes (A) successors to the Title of the Insured by operation of law as distinguished from purchase, including heirs, devisees, survivors, personal representatives, or next of kin; (B) successors to an Insured by dissolution, merger, consolidation, distribution, or reorganization; (C) successors to an Insured by its conversion to another kind of Entity; (D) a grantee of an Insured under a deed delivered without payment of actual valuable consideration conveying the Title (1) if the stock, shares, memberships, or other equity interests of the grantee are wholly - owned by the named Insured, (2) if the grantee wholly owns the named Insured, (3) if the grantee is wholly -owned by an affiliated Entity of the named Insured, provided the affiliated Entity and the named Insured are both wholly -owned by the same person or Entity, or (4) if the grantee is a trustee or beneficiary of a trust created by a written instrument established by the Insured named in Schedule A for estate planning purposes. (ii) With regard to (A), (B), (C), and (D) reserving, however, all rights and defenses as to any successor that the Company would have had against any predecessor Insured. (e) "Insured Claimant": An Insured claiming loss or damage. (f) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual knowledge, not constructive knowledge or notice that may be imputed to an Insured by reason of the Public Records or any other records that impart constructive notice of matters affecting the Title. (g) "Land": The land described in Schedule A, and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term "Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is insured by this policy. (h) "Mortgage": Mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law. (i) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at Date of Policy for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. With respect to Covered Risk 5(d), "Public Records" shall also include environmental protection liens filed in the records of the clerk of the United States District Court for the district where the Land is located. (j) "Title": The estate or interest described in Schedule A. (k) "Unmarketable Title": Title affected by an alleged or apparent matter that would permit a prospective purchaser or lessee of the Title or lender on the Title to be released from the obligation to purchase, lease, or lend if there is a contractual condition requiring the delivery of marketable title. 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of Date of Policy in favor of an Insured, but only so long as the Insured retains an estate or interest in the Land, or holds an obligation secured by a purchase money Mortgage given by a purchaser from the Insured, or only so long as the Insured shall have liability by reason of warranties in any transfer or conveyance of the Title. This policy shall not continue in force in favor of any purchaser from the Insured of either (i) an estate or interest in the Land, or (ii) an obligation secured by a purchase money Mortgage given to the Insured. 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT The Insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in case of any litigation as set forth in Section 5(a) of these Conditions, (ii) in case Knowledge shall come to an Insured hereunder of any claim of title or interest that is adverse to the Title, as insured, and that might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this policy, or (iii) if the Title, as insured, is rejected as Unmarketable Title. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Insured Claimant to provide prompt notice, the Company's liability to the Insured Claimant under the policy shall be reduced to the extent of the prejudice. 4. PROOF OF LOSS In the event the Company is unable to determine the amount of loss or damage, the Company may, at its option, require as a condition of payment that the Insured Claimant furnish a signed proof of loss. The proof of loss must describe the defect, lien, encumbrance, or other matter insured against by this policy that constitutes the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. S. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS (a) Upon written request by the Insured, and subject to the options contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, the Company, at its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for the defense of an Insured in litigation in which any third party asserts a claim covered by this policy adverse to the Insured. This obligation is limited to only those stated causes of action alleging matters insured against by this policy. The Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of the Insured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Insured as to those stated causes of action. It shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The Company will not pay any fees, costs, or expenses incurred by the Insured in the defense of those causes of action that allege matters not insured against by this policy. Form 5011453 (7-1-14) -Page 3 of 8 ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (6-17-06)1 Washington CONDITIONS (Continued) 6. (b) The Company shall have the right, in addition to the 7. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE CLAIMS; options contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, at its TERMINATION OF LIABILITY own cost, to institute and prosecute any action or In case of a claim under this policy, the Company shall have the proceeding or to do any other act that in its opinion may be following additional options: necessary or desirable to establish the Title, as insured, or (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance. to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Insured. The To pay or tender payment of the Amount of Insin-ance under Company may take any appropriate action under the terms this policy together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and of this policy, whether or not it shall be [[able to the expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were Insured. The exercise of these rights shall not be an authorized by the Company up to the time of payment or admission of liability or waiver of any provision of this tender of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay. policy. If the Company exercises its rights under this Upon the exercise by the Cojiipany of this option, all liability subsection, it must do so diligently. and obligations of the Company to the Insured under this (c) Whenever the Company brings an action or asserts a policy, other than to make the payment required in this defense as required or permitted by this policy, the subsection, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation Company may pursue the litigation to a final determination to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation. by a court of competent jurisdiction, and it expressly (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal any Insured or With the Insured Claimant. adverse judgment or order. DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE (i) To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the (a) In all cases where this policy permits or requires the name of an Insured Claimant any claim insured against Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any under this policy. In addition, the Company will pay any action or proceeding and any appeals, the Insured shall costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company defense in the action or proceeding, including the right to up to the time of payment and that the Company is use, at its option, the name of the Insured for this purpose. obligated to pay; or Whenever requested by the Company, the Insured, at the (ii) To pay or otherwise settle with the Insured Claimant the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable loss or damage provided for under this policy, together aid (i) in securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred prosecuting or defending the action or proceeding, or by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the effecting settlement, and (ii) in any other lawful act that in Company up to the time of payment and that the the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable Company is obligated to pay. to establish the Title or any other matter as insured. If the Upon the exercise by the Company of either of the options Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Insured to provided for in subsections (b)(i) or a the Company's p ()() () furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations obligations to the Insured under this policy for the claimed to the Insured under the policy shall terminate, including loss or damage, other than the payments required to be any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue made, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to any litigation, with regard the matter or matters defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation. (b) requiring such cooperation. The Company may reasonably require the Insured Claimant S. DETERMINATION AND EXTENT OF LIABILITY to stibimt to examination under oath by any authorized This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss representative of the Company and to produce for or damage sustained or incurred by the Insured Claimant who has examination, inspection, and copying, at such reasonable suffered loss or damage by reason of matters insured against by times and places as may be designated by the authorized this policy. representative of the Company, all records, in whatever (a) The extent of liability of the Company for loss or damage medium maintained, including books, ledgers, checks, under this policy shall not exceed the lesser of memoranda, correspondence, reports, e-mails, disks, tapes, (i) the Amount of Insurance; or and videos whether bearing a date before or after Date of (ii) the difference between the value of the Title as insured Policy, that reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. and the value of the Title subject to the risk insured Further, if requested by any authorized representative of against by this policy. the Company, the Insured Claimant shall grant its (b) If the Company pursues its rights under Section 5 of these permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of Conditions and is unsuccessful in establishing the Title, as the Company to examine, inspect, and copy all of these insured, records in the custody or control of a third party that (i) the Amount of Insurance shall be increased by 10%, and reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information (ii)the Insured Claimant shall have the right to have the designated as confidential by the Insured Claimant loss or damage determined either as of the date the provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not claim was made by the Insured Claimant or as of the be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment date it settled and paid. of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the t (c) In addition to the extent of liability under (a) and (b), the claim. Failure of the Insured Claimant to submit for examination under oath, produce any reasonably requested Company will also pay those costs, attorneys' fees, and information, or grant permission to secure reasonably expenses incurred in accordance with Sections 5 and 7 of necessary information from third parties as required in this these Conditions. subsection, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this policy as to that claim. Form 5011453 (7-1-14) Page 4 of 8 ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (6-17-06)' Washington[ CONDITIONS (Continued) 9. 10. 11 12. 13. 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY (a) If the Company establishes the Title, or removes the alleged defect, lien, or encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right of access to or from the Land, or cures the claim of Unmarketable Title, all as insured, in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused to the Insured. (b) In the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals, adverse to the Title, as insured. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to the Insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Insured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR TERMINATION OF LIABILITY All payments under this policy, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses, shall reduce the Amount of Insurance by the amount of the payment. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE The Amount of Insurance shall be reduced by any amount the Company pays under any policy insuring a Mortgage to which exception is taken in Schedule B or to which the Insured has agreed, assumed, or taken subject, or which is executed by an Insured after Date of Policy and which is a charge or lien on the Title, and the amount so paid shall be deemed a payment to the Insured under this policy. PAYMENT OF LOSS When liability and the extent of loss or damage have been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions, the payment shall be made within 30 days. RIGHTS OF RECOVERY UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT (a) Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this policy, it shall be subrogated and entitled to the rights of the Insured Claimant in the Title and all other rights and remedies in respect to the claim that the Insured Claimant has against any person or property, to the extent of the amount of any loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses paid by the Company. If requested by the Company, the Insured Claimant shall execute documents to evidence the transfer to the Company of these rights and remedies. The Insured Claimant shall permit the Company to sue, compromise, or settle in the name of the Insured Claimant and to use the name of the Insured Claimant in any transaction or litigation involving these rights and remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Insured Claimant, the Company shall defer the exercise of its right to recover until after the Insured Claimant shall have recovered its loss. (b) The Company's right of subrogation includes the rights of the Insured to indemnities, guaranties, other policies of insurance, or bonds, notwithstanding any terms or conditions contained in those instruments that address subrogation rights. ARBITRATION Either the Company or the Insured may demand that the claim or controversy shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Land Title Association ("Rules" }. Except as provided in the Rules, there shall be no joinder or consolidation with claims or controversies of other persons. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision, or to any other controversy or claim arising out of the transaction giving rise to this policy. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is in excess of $2,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Insured. Arbitration pursuant to this policy and under the Rules shall be binding upon the parties, lodgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction. 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY ENTIRE CONTRACT (a) This policy together with all endorsements, if any, attached to it by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the Insured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage that arises out of the status of the Title or by any action asserting such claim small be restricted to this policy. (c) Any amendment of or endorsement to this policy must be in writing and authenticated by an authorized person, or expressly incorporated by Schedule A of this policy. (d) Each endorsement to this policy issued at any time is made a part of this policy and is subject to all of its terms and provisions. Except as the endorsement expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsement, (iii) extend the Date of Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. 16. SEVERABILITY In the event any provision of this policy, in whole or in part, is held invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy shall be deemed not to include that provision or such part held to be invalid, but all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 17. CHOICE OF LAW; FORUM (a) Choice of Law: The Insured acknowledges the Company has underwritten the risks covered by this policy and determined the premium charged therefor in reliance upon the law affecting interests in real property and applicable to the interpretation, rights, remedies, or enforcement of policies of title insurance of the jurisdiction where the Land is located. Therefore, the court or an arbitrator shall apply the law of the jurisdiction where the Land is located to determine the validity of claims against the Title that are adverse to the Insured and to interpret and enforce the terms of this policy. In neither case shall the court or arbitrator apply its conflicts of law principles to determine the applicable law. (b) Choice of Forum: Any litigation or other proceeding brought by the Insured against the Company must be filed only in a state or federal court within the United States of America or its territories having appropriate jurisdiction. 18. NOTICES, WHERE SENT Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company under this policy must be given to the Company at First American Title Insurance Company, Attn: Claims National Intake Center, 1 First American Way; Santa Ana, CA 92707. Phone: 888-632- 1642. Form 5011453 (7-1-14) Rare 5 of 8 1 ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (6-17-06) Washington Fi st America. rL� Schedule A Owner's Policy of Title. surance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company POLICY NUMBER 12759342 _ Name and Address of Title Insurance Company: First American Title Insurance Company, 1 First American Way, Santa Ana, CA 92707. File No.: 4204-2759342 Address Reference: 116 SW 294th St, Federal Way, Amount of Insurance: $54,250.00 WA 98023 Premium: $680.00 Date of Policy: November 17, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. 1. Name of Insured: Subhash C. Sharma and Shakuntla Sharma, husband and wife 2. The estate or interest in the Land that is insured by this policy is: Fee Simple 3. Title is vested in: Subhash C. Sharma and Shakuntla Sharma, husband and wife 4. The Land referred to in this policy is described as follows: LOTS 29, 30, 31 AND 32, BLOCK 15, BUENNA ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 29, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH 40 FEET OF SOUTHWEST 294TH STREET, AS VACATED BY DECREE ENTERED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 669986. APN:119600128506 Form 5011453 (7-1-14) Page 6 of 8 ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (6-17-06) Washington Schedule B File No.: 4204-2759342 Owner's Policy of Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company POLICY NUMBER 2759342 EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: Part One: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or materials or medical assistance heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 6. (A) Unpatented mining claims; (B) Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (C) Water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not. the matters excepted under (A), (B) or (C) are shown by the public records; (D) Indian Tribal Codes or Regulations, Indian Treaty or Aboriginal Rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, construction, tap or reimbursement charges/costs for sewer, water, garbage or electricity. Form 5011453 (7-1-14)Pane 7 of 8 ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (6-17-06) VJasi�ington Part Two: 1. Taxes which may be assessed and extended on any subsequent roll for the tax year 2016, with respect to new improvements and the first occupancy which may be included on the regular assessment roll and which are an accruing lien not yet due or payable. 2. Any and all offers of dedication, conditions, restrictions, easements, boundary discrepancies or encroachments, notes and/or provisions shown or disclosed by Short Plat or Plat of Buenna Addition recorded in Volume 6 of Piats, Page 9. 3. Easement, including terms d provisions containe therein:Q_ Recording Information: 6245218 For: Driveway an ility purposes 4. Easement, including terms an provision containe erein: Recording Information: 76021307�2 In Favor of: Lakehaven Sewer D' rict, a Municipal Corporation For: Sewer mains ' appurtenances thereto Form 5011453 (7-1-14) Page 8 of 8 ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (6-17-06) i 1 Washington 41% DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8`b Avenue South CITY OF Federal Way Federal Way, WA 9 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2602609 www.citvoffedemlway.com CALCULATING TREE UNITS RECEIVE® This form can be used to demonstrate how you will meet the minimum tree utAg0Ae*V for your site and should accompany your submittal. Trees to be retained or pl t d must also be shown on your submitted site plan, or a separate tree plan. i MUNFEDERAL PMENT ' 7 00 - 43,560 (sf/acre) _ �y x 25 (units/acre) _ (lot size in square feet) (lot size in acres) (minimum tree units) Existing Trees Includes all trees except invasive species and hazard trees Tree Size (diameter at breast height /4.51 # of Trees to Remain Tree Units Total Units 1"to 6" dbh T7 x 1.0 = % > 6" to 12" dbh 5 /p x 1.5 = /5 > 12" to 18" dbh 7 1 x 2.0 = it > 18" to 24" dbh Z x 2.5 = q-, 51 > 24" dbh x 3.0 = a Total Existing Tree Units to Remain Replacement/Additional Trees Evergreen Trees — minimum 6' in height at planting Deciduous Trees — minimum 2" caliper at planting Large Canopy = 1.5 Tree Units Medium Canopy = 1 Tree Unit Small Canopy = .5 Tree Units Tree Species Canopy (Sm/Med/Lg) Tree Units# of Trees Total Units It Total Proposed Tree Units to be Added Total Existing and Proposed Tree Units -� Z Bulletin #073 — June 8, 2016 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Calculating Tree Units /-� FILE CITY OF Federal Way May 24, 2017 Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma 317 SW 295`' Place Federal Way, WA 98023 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityofederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Email: sharmarco tlt vahoo.cojn RE: File 417-102125-00-AD; WETLAND DELINEATION & STREAM BUFFER INTRUSION Sharma Buffer Intrusion; 2"" Avenue & SW 294th St., Federal Way (Parcel: 119600-1285) Dear Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma: Please find the enclosed consultant task authorization with a scope of work for review of the `Critical Areas DesigMition Report - Parcel 119600-1285.' The Department's consultant, Landau Associates Inc., was asked to provide an estimate for their review of information prepared by Sewall Wetland Consulting Inc., May 3, 2017. The normal course of action is for the City to set up an account to be funded by the applicant and drawn down by the work performed by Landau Associates Inc. Please note that if any of the funds are not used, they will be returned to the applicant. A check in the amount of $5,300.00, payable to the City of Federal Way, and a signature on the authorization form must be submitted in order for the review to begin. Please note —this fee will cover the review of the materials, field review, and technical ►nemorandum(s). Any meeting would occur during Landau's field review if requested by the applicant. Additional reviews or meetings beyond that will require a supplemental cost and authorization. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please contact me at 253-835-2644, or LeiIa. willoughby-oakes@cityoffederaIway. com. Sincerel eila Willoughby -Oakes -- Associate Planner enc: Task Authorization Form Fee Invoice 17-102125-00-;\D Due I D 7�e76 DATE: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL May 9, 2017 TO: vCole.Elliott, Development Services. Manager Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer FROM: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Associate Planner FOR DR MTG. ON., June 1, 2017 - Internal Completeness Review (Please email if Internal DRC required) FILE NUMBER(s): RELATED FILE NOS.: PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS ZONING DISTRICT. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: LAND USE PERMITS: PROJECT CONTACT: MATERIALS SUBMITTED: 17-102034-UP .�- Pending SF & AD Peer Review Stream Buffer Intrusion `XXXX 2nd Ave. SW, Parcel#: 119600-1285 RS 9.6 �y Request for intrusion into stream buffer (FWRC 19.145.330} dep'scted on site plan, for a 3,500 sq. ft. home, with a 1,800 sq. ft. footprint and driveway and walkway. Access proposed off of 2"d Ave. S. Erosion hazard area. -L� The applicant has proposed to classify the stream as Np with a 50-foot stream buffer. The project will be peer reviewed by Landau & Assoc. Process III Subhash C. Sharma (Owner) 317 SW 295"' Place Federal Way WA 98023 Email: sharmarco rtr7i ahoo.com Ed Sewall Senior Wetlands Ecologist Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. PO Box 880 Fall City, WA 98024 Email: esewall0sewallwc.com • Master Land Use Application • Narrative ■ S-T-R Map • Certificate of Water/Sewer Availability • ESM Site Plan/Critical Area Map • Site Plan w/ proposed footprint • Preliminary Geotechnical Report • Wetland Assessment, prepared by Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. (no buffer restoration/monitoring plan included) ~ /_\ ). \ ' ` . ` | '\ � ~ BLOCK 1,5 tAA 75.00, ------------ TO GETHER WrFH THAT PORTION OF tw,366TH HALF OF VACATED THIRD STREET LYING BETWEEN THE EAST LINIE,61i 0 SAID LOT 14 AND THE WEST LINE Or SAID LOT16. PRODUCE NORTHERLY. THE SOUTH HALF OF THAT PORTION OF VACATE)D FEET OF "EN THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT S. T�M STREET LYING BETWL % -T BLOCK 31. SAO PLAT, AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT �15, SLqCK V. SAID PLAT. PIRODUCED NORTHERLY. EXCEPT THAT TiON LYING wm*N THE ABOVE DESCRISED MAIN TRACT- .-Y �v Poa NOTE - FOR BUENNA, I cc PC RM" 2' PIPE 0 SET LINE STAKE W IS EXISTING MON/CASE A SET NAL/I.d. tag FENCE LINE RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE or r ird jh1 I 9ft&t7.?.'m- This map correctly raprosento a survey made by me BOUNDARY SURVEY FEDERAL W� ok. Iof#A�Sst paqo.2�7..at the request of or uriaej� my direction in conformance with the FOR requirements of the lugov Recording Act si the DWN. By ~ M. / -----_ - - Dated: May 3rd, 2017 To: City of Federal way, Department of community Development services 33325 8th Avenue South Federal way, WA98003-2009 Subject: Single family home process III project approval for parcel # 119600-1285 ,�, 5 D or -s Dear Sir, A meeting held with senior planner, Stacy Welsh regarding project requirements and checklist provided. Please see attachments. 1) Completed master Land use application with owner's signature 2) Application fee paid. 3) Two copies of current letters for water sewer availability from Lake Heaven 4) Eight copies of site plan showing home location completed by Residential group Inc. Civil engineering company located in Federal way. 5) Site survey and topographic survey completed by E ngineering Inc. 6) Critical areas report for stream delineation a d'sfream buffer enhancement plan completed by Seawall Wetland consulting Inc. 7) Geotechnical report completed by Agis Engineering LLC for the residence to be built. 8) Tree Vegetation retention plan 9) Public notice requirement for Process III for properties within 300 feet of the boundary. Envelops stamped and return address label to City of Federal way 10)Reference to an approval carried out for property located P house from this property and same stream delineation: Federal Way File No 13_102595-00-UP I am looking forward to your kind consideration and approval for the single family home construction. Thanks Subhash C Sharma 317 SW 2951h place Federal Way, WA98023 •/ MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION r DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South CITY OF -_ 5 ` Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal WayRECEIVED 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.citvof edcrahvay.corn MAY 0 4 2017 /,07 `," 4 N fEn FMEII y� Date r �� APPLICATION NO(s) / _ Project Name Pr d cc 5' Property Address/Location Zvi Awe- -C-- 0 � Gd Parcel Number(s) % G ® 0 12- 8 5 Project Description _ S PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information ' ! Zoning Designation rT Comprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type Construction Type (./ 7' e Y' V ems 1, Applicant d Name: _5-Utg1-1y7_911 �•'I�i���it'/f�7 Address: 3 f 7 SCIJ 2_1 1-5 4k CiiylState: x��C;le V,_ War Phone: Fax.: :;I_o61937S Email: Signature: pp Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Bulletin #003 —January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application AP CONSULTING ENGINEERS PLLC February 19, 2018 Ms. Leila Willoughby -Oakes 33325 8tn Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 RE: Sharma Residence (File 17-102125-OOUP) Response to 1st Review Comments Leila: CIVIL ENGINEERING RESUBMITTED FEB 2 2 7018 MY OF FEDERAL WAY ^�'MMUNfTY DEVELOPMEW This letter includes a number of sets of comments. The responses immediately following this address response to the city's first set of engineering review comments, dated October 5th, 2017 and December 29th, 2017: Ann Dower, Development Services Division, ar n.dower@ci!yoffederalway.com, 253-835-2732: Public Works has completed a review of the August 29, 2017, Sharma stream buffer intrusion technical information report submittal. The applicant is required to provide additional information on how, exactly, the roof runoff will be conveyed and where a dispersion pipe, outfall, trench, etc. will be located. The stormwater plan for Sharma Residence was prepared to meet the standards found in the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) as administered by the City of Federal Way. Per Section C.1.3.1, the project is considered a small lot and small lot BMPs are required to be implemented, as feasible. The small lot BMPs were analyzed for their feasibility in this project. Due to the presence of a type Np stream and a category IV wetland located at the West edge of the property, there is limited space available on the property to place any flow control BMPs. The runoff from the house roof will be dissipated via splash block, the runoff then disperses through the forested area and discharges into the stream. The dispersion pipes or the trenches are not proposed for this project, to keep the buffer disturbance at a minimum. 2. The applicant is required to provide frontage improvements along the property frontage(s) - 2nd Ave SW is type W street, and should consist of 28' of pavement with 4' planter strips, 5' sidewalks, 3' utility strips, street -lightings, and street trees on both sides. The developer is responsible for bringing their frontage into conformation with the FWRC. The project owner of this project has elected to apply for a Right of Way Modification Application in lieu of frontage improvements along the property frontage. VJht dea " f s/lq APCE@APConsultingEngineers.com (253) 737-4173 PO Box 162, Auburn, WA 98071 The responses immediately following this address the City's letter of December 29th, 2017: 1. Site Plan - With the residence footprint redesign, please list the total lot coverage. You propose Grass -Crete and building footprint reduced by 50 square feet. a. The applicant proposes a Grass -Crete driveway in order to reduce impervious surface impacts within the stream and wetland buffers. Grass -Crete will be counted at only 50 percent lot coverage per FWRC 19.110.020 (c) b. You may consider making any proposed walkways and decks Grass -Crete to further reduce buffer disturbance/ mitigation requirements. The total impervious area coverage on the lot is 2,147 square feet (1,500 sf of proposed building footprint + 1,012 square feet of proposed Grass -Crete driveway + 282 square feet of Grass -Crete walkway). As requested the proposed driveway and the walkway in this project will be Grass -Crete. 2. The city is waiting on a revised critical area plan, report, and mitigation sequencing prepared by Sewall Wetland Consultants in response to the enclosed Landau memo. Do depict the 40-foot wetland buffers, although they are within the stream buffer. The 40-foot wetland buffer has been added to the site plan. 3. Critical Area Signs - Please place this note on the construction plan as condition of the process III approval: "The boundary between a critical area buffer and contiguous land shall be identified with permanent signs. The signs shall be designed for high durability and installed one per lot maintained by the property owner in perpetuity." Addressed by others. 4. Prior to building occupancy, the applicant shall record a critical area restrictive covenant on title (sample enclosed). The plan shall include and delineate all areas with their critical areas associated buffers and building setbacks. The final process III site plan shall be attached to the notice on title per FWRC 19.145.170. Addressed by others. 5. Please show the wetland buffer within the Np stream buffer using different hatch - marks. Estimate the total wetland buffer and stream buffer square footage impacted by 35*50 (1750 square foot) building footprint, driveway, and other proposed site improvements. A long rambler or ranch style residence might reduce the amount of wetland mitigation, planting and bonding amounts required to monitor plantings/buffer restoration work within a wetland buffer (FWRC 19.145.130 (2)) Wetland buffer within the Np stream buffer is shown using different hatch -marks. Total estimated buffer impact by the proposed development is shown on the site plan prepared by Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. 6. It appears the applicant proposes development within the wetland buffer -wetland buffer mitigation requirements would apply, which vary from stream buffer enhancement plans. Please see the enclosed code sections. The proposed residence has been moved out of the wetland buffer area in updated site plan. There are no proposed developments in the wetland buffer. 7. Front Yard Setback- If the following applies, you may reduce the front yard setback to 10- feet from the property line. "Front yard setbacks for single-family residential development on lots with a slope of 15 percent or greater may be applied in a flexible manner where such application will protect slopes and natural features from development encroachments. However, a minimum front yard setback of 10 - feet must be maintained in all cases, and a minimum 20-foot setback shall apply to garages, unless the garage and driveway are oriented in such a way as to provide minimum 20-feet length of parking area (label calculation on site plan) in front of the garage within the property boundaries." The site is a corner lot and therefore, 10 feet shall also be maintained from the 20-foot ingress/egress easement (SW 294th Street). Please show the areas on the parcel with a slope of 15 percent of greater. On Sheet L1, note the contours intervals for staff to evaluate if FWRC 19.120.110 (6) applies. Moving the building closer to 2nd Avenue SW, or reducing the building footprint to 1,600 square feet, may decrease critical area impacts. The applicant's geotechnical report states there are no slopes on site greater than 15 percent, but they do not state if there are slopes equal to 15 percent. If there are slopes equal to 15 percent FWRC 19.120.110 (6) can apply if accepted by public works. The front setback for the proposed house has been reduced to 10-feet from the west property line. Slope labels for the site areas that are 15 percent or greater have been added to the site plan. The building footprint has been reduced to 1,500 square feet in order to reduce the critical area impacts on the property. 8. If above is not the case, the applicant may consider requesting an administrative variance of 25 percent of the front setback designate (from 20 feet to 15 feet) pursuant per FWRC 19.45.303 variance approval criteria (enclosed). Please contact Associate Planner Leila Willoughby -Oakes at Leila.willoughby-oakes@cityoffederalway.com if you have any questions. The case mentioned above applies to this project, therefore, no variance is required. 9.On Sheet 1 of 1, add the following note under critical area fence notes: "Fence posts shall be placed in crushed rock backfill." Addressed by others. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact us at (253) 737-4173. Sincerely, AP19PNSULTING ENGINEERS PLLC 61--1- Amit Sharma Civil Design Engineer crTv ❑1= -44� Federal Way Centered on Opportunity June 18, 2018 Subhash Sharma 317 SW 295' PL Federal Way, WA 98023 RE. Permit #18-101348-00-SM; SHARMA,120 SW 294' St, Federal Way Dear Mr. Sharma: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Economic Development The City has reviewed your request for reconsideration of the May 31, 2018 Right -of -Way Modification decision, and has made the following determination. There are two file numbers associated with your development proposal so far — one for your right-of-way modification request and one for your land use process. The number on this letter and 17-102034-00-UP are tied to your parcel number, as will several other file and permit numbers as your development progresses. The May 31, 2018 modification decision has the correct number and is associated with your parcel. Since access for the future home is going to be taken off of 2nd Ave SW, the address currently shown will not be its final address. The improvements required by the May 31, 2018 decision are a reduction in City standards, which include curb, gutter, sidewalk, planter strip, and street trees. Recognizing that no one in this area has installed those improvements, staff waived them for your property based on provisions in Federal Way Revised Code Section 19.135.070. Where the road is a substandard width, several developers along 2"d Ave SW have been required to construct pavement along their frontage to improve safety, sometimes as much as 20 feet. The requirement to install five feet of pavement along your frontage and restore drainage is reasonable and will not be waived. If you have any questions, please contact Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer, at 253-835- 2732 or at ann.dower(a)cityoffederalway.corn. Sincerely, E7 lsh. P.E. Deputy Public Works Director EJW/AD:av cc: Cole Elliott, P.E.; Development Services Manager Project File/ad Day File \\CFWFILE I\Applications\CSDC\PROD\does\save\ 150853_77892_15152637.DOC Dated: June 5th, 2018 To: EJ Walsh CC: Cole Elliott; Ann Dower; Leila Willoughby -Oaks Development service division City of federal way Subject: Reference to your letter dated May 31 st for frontage variance Please note that letter reference mentioned as " Permit #18-101348-00-SM; Right -of —Way Modification request; Sharma 120 SW 294TH St, Federal way is in error. My permit is # 17-102034-00-UP and it is 2"d SW 294th Street. Letter submitted for your approval for front side property improvements are out of my property line since 40 feet has been granted from 2"d Avenue in favor of Lakehaven Sewer District per recording #7602130712 so road is away from my property line by 40 feet and lined up with large trees with no ditch section on my side of the property. Improvement will not be harmonious with existing street improvements, would not function properly or safety or would not be advantageous to the neighborhood or city as a whole, Please see attached pictures of the street with existing homes. This improvement will look odd for the current street in the neighborhood environment. However I will provide improvement by cleaning up side and gravel on 5 feet to match with all houses on 2"d Ave. I had discussed all above with Mr. Cole Elliot on 4t" June and I am requesting you to please reconsider based upon facts attached with this letter and please grant waver. Thanks Subhash C Sharma 317 SW 295t" place Federal Way, WA98023 RECEIVED Attachments:1) letter from city 2) Photos of the area JUN 0 7 2018 CiiY OF FEDERAL WAY OOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF � Federal Way May 31, 2018 Subhash & Shakuntla Sharma 317 SW 295 h PL Federal Way, WA 98023 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederaA,vay.com Economic Development RE: Permit #18-101348-00-SM, Right -of -Way Modification Request; Sharma 120 SW 294'h St, Federal Way Dear Mr. and Mrs. Sharma: The City of Federal Way has reviewed your request to waive frontage improvements on 2Id Ave SW. After evaluating the existing conditions along the referenced street, review of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) provisions (Section 19.135.280; 19.135.040), and the direction provided by the City Council, the Public Works Department hereby denies your request to waive frontage improvements, however a modification will be granted as follows: Corresponding to City Standard Street Section "W", 2nd Avenue SW is identified as a Local Road, which requires a 28 foot paved roadway with a 4-foot planter strip, 5-foot sidewalk and 3-foot utility strip on both sides. The road is currently paved to a width of 18 feet with 2' wide shoulders and ditch. FWRC section 19.135.070 criteria (1) "The improvements as required would not be harmonious with existing street improvements, would not function properly or safely or would not be advantageous to the neighborhood or city as a whole" applies to this frontage, since there is no curb, gutter, sidewalk, or planter strip in the neighborhood. The road, however, does need to meet minimum pavement width standards. The applicant will be responsible for half of the remaining pavement width necessary to bring the road up to standard. The applicant is required to increase the pavement width by 5 feet, and construct necessary tapers. The shoulder and ditch section must be restored to original width and function. Plans shall be prepared and stamped by a civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer, at 253-835-2732. Sincerely, /JWalsh, P.E. Deputy Public Works Director EJW:AD/av cc: Cole Elliott, P.E.; Development Services Manager Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Associate Planner Project File/AD RECEIVE Day File JUN 0 7 2018 \\CFWFILEI\Applications\CSDCIPRODWms)mvc1150853_77812_31081958.DOC CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - �i^ "h9 • Ljy `�vi? Ir Y _-i_:��, r :ry •rolr, •�s� - � - _ �� �' _ �rI •->� ~ - - 'i, ^�.;'�'4 �R:1` y�:• ,•�r.. - - -L ..4—.� ,4- ... �•.e� .r '�e � ter. � - � r _ A��`' l,r��-, . :� �•.:. r MF 'c •7W�- '� ems• �� , 40 -a. r _ �� - W— .1- z a` —W— EXGWAm W— gMAIN —� m - m mzcXi {20w EXG SEWER MAIN (REF) I EXG 24.0' INGRESS & m - a EGRESS PRNATE EASSMENT ti J = 'i' r II J dHO — — — dHO — illill.� I yr 47 -O I r D ! ; •. S-' J O O p� O z O m o m w m 101, ai Cl2 �• pc�rnm Oiri C1 ti cGJ O .'oo C�z O mZ �mOOZ TOE ` y L7 .� O�[72Oy OOO a�2Z '/^� _ VJ IT � 0 <G � 0 0 m -i ,/^•11 Z� Z� Z (ail A fZr�� O O O m 2 0 0 O -iO3 asx T1�m.Z] Z my�my TNmfn /�'/^� •'iy1Z0fA� 0—G' V70 TxtnO LJ v II' T O y m myC VJ LiCCZtiC VJ� Z O f7l mm N c a m�mop� �maz m ni x cai c"ra'i �AAmommzm��zo���Z�xm TI zm m mmc-rymc�mz oz=m r D p no z ma m I -I -I _ czi�?�m�aZsm=m Z z om mz O O T m T y n O y V l y O Pi -i O O 1 0 Z t �mi.'� CJ 2 x to n p z m o r �Zn�$$om< j m x to T o E p S Z ox z N m O �T1 p r O O O n T G Z Z I-rI CONSULTING � � . y CD C r ' ZD ENGINEERS PLLC �9p� Ab z CIVIL ENGINEERING APCWCwcrdGrglEngine rs.ccn (253) 737-4173 PO BOX 162, AUBURN, WA 96071 o y REVISIONS SHARMA RESIDENCE y O OTm. Z m SVM. DESCRIPTION DATE n p p SITE, GRADING & j UTILITIES PLAN ? � V 293XX 2ND AVENUE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA i CITY OF Federal Way PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STREET MODIFICATION REQUEST /ACTION Project Name Sharma single family residence Permit # 18-101348-00-SM Location SW 294 h Street/2nd Ave SW Request Staff Analysis: A single family home is proposed on this undeveloped parcel. The applicant is requesting a waiver of frontage improvements on 2nd Ave SW based on Federal Way Revised Code section 19.135.070 Modifications, Deferments, and Waivers, criteria 1) The improvement as required would not be harmonious with existing street improvements, would not function properly or safely or would not be advantageous to the neighborhood or city as a whole. 2nd Ave SW is classified as a Type "W" Street requiring 28 feet of pavement with 4' planter strip, 5' sidewalk, and 3' utility strip on both sides, all within a 52' right-of-way. The pavement is currently 18 feet wide, with 2' shoulders and ditch. Right-of-way is approximately 80' wide, with the road located almost entirely within the opposite side of the right-of-way per the applicant's site plan. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk were not installed when this neighborhood was developed. Typically only street or shoulder widening has been required for the infrequent development that has occurred since. 2nd Ave SW right-of-way status has come into question since this area falls under the Ballinger Act. However, the right-of-way has not been officially conveyed to this property owner and the City of Federal Way has maintained the road, including a pavement overlay in 1998. Due to these factors, City policy has been to consider the road public and therefor subject to public road standards. However, if it were considered a private road, FWRC section 19. 135.090, which requires that private roads be brought up to public road standards, would apply. Staff recommends modifying, rather than waiving, the requirements. The applicant should be required to pave an additional 5' of roadway (half of the width necessary to bring it up to standard) to create a 23' pavement width, provide tapers, and restore the shoulder and ditch section. Requirements / Conditions of Approval Road widening and drainage plans, along with a pavement section detail shall be provided as part of the building permit application. Plan_ s shall be stamped by a civil engineer licensed in Washington State. Staff Recommendation Development Services Reviewer Development Services Manager Traffic Division Reviewer Traffic Division Manager Deputy Director Director Decision Initial Date Z;L C CIE Approve U CITY OF ~ J Federal Way PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STREET MODIFICATION REQUEST /ACTION Project Name Sharma single family residence Permit # 18-101348-00-SM Location SW 294d' Street/2nd Ave SW Request Staff Analysis: A single family home is proposed on this undeveloped parcel. The applicant is requesting a waiver of frontage improvements on 2nd Ave SW based on Federal Way Revised Code section 19.135.070 Modifications, Deferments, and Waivers, criteria 1) The improvement as required would not be harmonious with existing street improvements, would not function properly or safely or would not be advantageous to the neighborhood or city as a whole. 2nd Ave SW is classified as a Type "W" Street requiring 28 feet of pavement with 4' planter strip, 5' sidewalk, and 3' utility strip on both sides, all within a 52' right-of-way. The pavement is currently 18 feet wide, with 2' shoulders and ditch. Right-of-way is approximately 80' wide, with the road located almost entirely within the opposite side of the right-of-way per the applicant's site plan. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk were not installed when this neighborhood was developed. Typically only street or shoulder widening has been required for the infrequent development that has occurred since. Staff recommends modifying, rather than waiving, the requirements. The applicant should be required to pave an additional 5' of roadway (half of the remaining road width), provide tapers, and restore the shoulder and ditch section. Requirements / Conditions of Approval Road widening and drainage plans, along with a pavement section detail shall be provided as part of the building permit application. Plans shall be stamped by a civil engineer licensed in Washington State. Staff Recommendation Initial Development Services Reviewer Development Services Manager Traffic Division Manager Deputy Director Date Approve Deny ❑ 93 Raom-e-d'c R--- ❑ 1 k Director Decision ❑ 13 I ~ W q � W � V � o \FO \ m 2 0 \ \ I \ � 2 � \ & On > - / ƒ}}§ or; \ § 7$� Ile `(f2) -!,,■ k�§�k §)2«ƒ - - - -�--- }$4273 = e ��f)k ��k/$It �� 2A� �2!_ ® `°d/� ' Ak c1TYOF Federal Way DATE: 3/14/18 MEMORANDUM Public Works Department TO: Leila Willoughby -Oakes FROM: Ann Dower 6Z�_ SUBJECT: SHARMA - STREAM BUFFER INTRUSION - (17-102034-00-UP) 120 SW 294TH ST The information provided on February 22, 2018 has been reviewed. The information did not address my comments from previous reviews. The stream butter intrusion may be approved only with the following conditions: 1. The building permit site plan shall show proper flow control meeting the requirements of the storm water regulations currently in place at the time of submittal. 2. An infiltration test meeting current storm water requirements shall be provided as part of the building permit to verify suitability for infiltration. 3. Only asphalt is allowed within public right-of-way. Grasscrete pavers may only be used on private property. 4. A separate Right -of -Way Permit will be required for work within the public right-of-way, such as the driveway and utilities. 5. Per Federal Way Revised Code section 19.135.030, the applicant will be required to build frontage improvements along 2nd Ave SW unless a right-of-way modification is granted. The applicant indicates in the response letter that an application for modification was made, however a file was not created. Please contact the Permit Center to verify that a complete application was submitted. The frontage improvements are a condition of building permit approval. Ages Engineering, LLC A Geotechnical and Environmental Services, LLC P.O. Box 935 Puyallup, WA. 98371 (253) 845-7000 www.+gccn�i�ru:s inK.com PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT SW 294t' Street Residential 200 — SW 294th Street Federal Way, Washington Parcel Number:1196001285 Project No. A-1313 Prepared For: Subhash Sharma 317 SW 2951 Place Federal Way, Washington 98023 RECEIVE® MAY 0 4 2017 January 4, 2017 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ages Engineering, LLC P.O. Puyallup, 5 WA. 98371 Main (253) 845-7000 A Geotechnical and Environmental Services LLC www.agesengmeffi%.com January 4, 2017 Project No. A-1313 Subhash Sharma 317 SW 2951a Place Federal Way, WA. 98023 Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Report SW 2941 Street Residential 200 SW 2941' Street Federal Way, Washington PN: 1196001285 Dear Mr. Sharma, As requested, we have conducted a preliminary geotechnical study for the subject project. The attached report presents our findings and recommendations for the geotechnical aspects of project design and construction. Our field exploration indicates the site is generally underlain with 12 to 24 inches of organic soil overlying native, medium dense to dense, older glacially consolidated, silty sand with varying amounts of gravel soils. We did not observe groundwater seepage in either of the test holes advanced on the site. In our opinion, the soil and groundwater conditions at the site are suitable for the planned development. The new structure can be supported on typical spread footing foundations bearing on the native medium dense to dense silty sand soils observed below a depth of 1.0 to 2.0 feet below surface grades, or on new granular structural fill placed above the existing native site soils. Detailed recommendations addressing these issues and other geotechnical design considerations are presented in the attached report. We trust the information presented is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional_ information, please call. Ages Engineering, LLC page 1 253-845-7000 Respectfully Submitted, Ages Engineering, LLC a P' dK .p 38917 �OdST$��■�y"4 Bernard P. Knoll, H Principal BPK:bpk Project Number: A-1313 Project Name: SW 294m Street Residential Date: January 4, 2017 Ages Engineering, LLC 253-845-7000 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...................................................................1 2.0 SCOPE ..........-- • ............................. 3.0 SITE CONDI'I'IONS...............................•---••------•----..........................2 3.1 Surface.................................................................................2 3.2 Soils ........................................... .......2 .................................. 3.3 Mapped Soils.........................................................................3 3.4 Groundwater..........................................................................3 4.0 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS..................................................................... 3 4.1 General..... ......................................................3 4.2 Landslide.--..........................................................................4 4.3 Erosion..................................................................................4 4.4 Seismic.................................................................................5 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS..........................................5 5.1 General.................................................................................5 5.2 Site Preparation and Grading....................................................... 6 5.3 Excavations...........................................................................7 5.4 Foundations............................................................................7 5.5 Slab -on -Grade Floors................................................................8 5.6 Lower level and Building Walls...................................................9 5.7 Storm water...........................................................................10 5.8 Drainage - - - - - - . ---••.......................................................... .........10 6.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES....................................................... • -- ........ I I 7.0 LIMITATIONS.............................................................................. ..11 Figures SiteVicinity Map ...................... .................. .... ................................... Figure 1 Exploration Location Plan.....................................................................Figure 2 GeologicMap ........................... _ . _ ................................................Figure 3 Coastal Zone Atlas Map .......... . ...........................................................Figure 4 Appendix SiteExploration.......................................................................... Appendix A Ages E%keering, LLC Page 1 253-945-7000 Preliminary Geotechnical Report SW 29411 Street Residential 200 SW 2941 Street Federal Way, Washington 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION rb The project will consist of a residential development. We discussed the project Z h the o A er. Based on our conversation, we understand the existing site will be developed winew sin .le - family residence located in the western end of the site. Access to the site will be from Street located along the southern side of the site, and from 2°d Avenue SW located along the western side of the site. Finish site grades are currently not available. _However, based on our experience with similar projects, we expect cuts and fills of up to 4.0 feet in depth will be necessary to construct the new residence. Storm water collected on the site will likely discharge on the site. :. We expect the new residence will be a two to three-story wood -framed structure with raised floors constructed over a crawl space. The attached garage will have slab -on -grade floors. Foundation loads should be relatively light, in the range of 1 to 3 kips per lineal foot for bearing walls and up to 25 kips for isolated column footings. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on our understanding of the above stated site and the planned project design features. If actual site conditions differ, the planned project design features are different than we expect, or if changes are made, we should review them in order to modify or supplement our conclusions and recommendations as necessary. 2.0 SCOPE On December 19, 2016, we excavated two hand -augured test holes to a maximum depth of 8.0 feet below surface grades. Using the information obtained from our subsurface exploration, we developed geotechnical design and construction recommendations for the project. Specifically this report addresses the following: • Reviewing the available geologic, hydrogeologic and geotechnical data for the site area, and conducting a geologic reconnaissance of the site area • Addressing the appropriate geotechnical regulatory requirements for the planned site development, including a Geologic Hazard evaluation. • Advancing two test holes in the planned new development area to a maximum depth of approximately 8.0 feet below surface grades. • Providing geotechnical recommendations for site grading including site preparation, subgrade preparation, fill placement criteria, suitability of on -site soils for use as Ages Engineering, LLC Nge 1 253845-7000 structural fill, temporary and permanent cut and fill slopes, and drainage and erosion control measures. Providing geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of new foundations and floor slabs, including allowable bearing capacity and estimates of settlement. Providing geotechnical recommendations for lower level building or retaining walls, including backfill and drainage requirements, lateral design loads, and lateral resistance values. Providing an evaluation of the steep slopes on the site. • Providing recommendations for site drainage. It should be noted that our work does not include services related to environmental remediation or design and performance issues related to moisture intrusion through walls. An appropriate design professional or qualified contractor should be contacted to address these issues. 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 Surface The subject site area is a rectangular -shaped residential parcel located at the 200 block of SW 294'h Street in Federal Way, Washington. The subject site is currently unoccupied. The site is bordered with residential lots to the north and east, by 2nd Avenue SW to the west, and by SW 2941h Street to the south. The location of the site is shown on the Site Vicinity Map provided in Figure 1. In general, surface grades in the vicinity of the site slope down to the north. The subject site slopes down to the north at surface grades ranging from 0 to 12 percent. Site vegetation consists of typical medium sized deciduous and coniferous trees with relatively thin underbrush. A small water course crosses the eastern end of the site. A 50-foot stream buffer has been established along the eastern end of the site. 3.2 Soils The soils we observed at the site generally consist of 1.0 to 2.0 feet of organic soil overlying native silty sand with varying amounts of gravel soils consistent with older, Pre -Fraser glacial and non -glacial soils. In Test Hole TH-1, located in the NW portion of the site, we encountered 24 inches of dark brown organic laced soils overlying moist, medium dense, native silty sand to a depth of 5.0 feet below surface grades. Below 5.0 feet, the soils became dense, moist to wet, grayish tan mottled orange, slightly cemented silty sand consistent with older glacially placed soils. No mottling was observed below 7.0 feet. In Test Hole TH-2, located in the SW portion of the site, we encountered 12 inches of dark brown organic laced soils overlying moist to wet, medium dense, native silty sand to a depth of 5.0 feet below surface grades. Below 5.0 feet, the soils became dense, moist, grayish tan, and slightly cemented silty sand with gravel consistent with older Ages Engineering, LLC Page 2 253-845-7000 glacially transported soils. All of the test holes were terminated in the dense, native glacially consolidated soils. Figures A-1 and A-2 present more detailed descriptions of the subsurface conditions encountered in the test holes. The approximate test hole locations are shown on the Exploration Location Plan provided in Figure 2. 3.3 Manned Soils According to The Geologic Map of the Poverty Bay 7.5' Quadrangle, King and Pierce Counties, Washington, by Derek B. Booth, H. H. Waldron, K. G. Troost, the soil in the vicinity of the site is mapped as Older Glacial and Non -Glacial Deposits (Qpogr). The Older Glacial and Non -Glacial Deposits are described as fine-grained deposits of predominantly silt and clay. The Older Glacial and Non -Glacial Deposits were deposited by glacial events occurring prior to the most recent Fraser Glaciation, approximately 12,000 to 15,000 years ago. These soils niay or may not have been over -ridden by the older glacial ice mass. However, they have been overridden by the glacial ice mass of the Fraser Glaciation. These soils will commonly be found in a dense to very dense condition due to their over consolidated nature. The near surface soils at the site have been disturbed by natural weathering processes that have occurred since their deposition. No springs or groundwater seepage was observed on the surface of the site at the time of our site visit. A copy of the Geologic Map for the subject site is provided in Figure 3. According to the Department of Ecology Coastal Zone Atlas map for the subject site, the site and the areas around the site are classified as Stable (S). 3.4 Groundwater We did not encounter groundwater seepage m any of the test holes advanced on the site. However, we expect a seasonal perched water table develops above the underlying dense glacially consolidated soils at times during the wet winter months. The groundwater levels and flow rates will fluctuate seasonally and typically reach their highest levels during and shortly following the wet winter months (October through May). 4.0 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 4.1 General According to Chapter 19.145.220 in the City of Federal Way Municipal Code geologically hazard areas are defined as "areas susceptible to erosion, land sliding, seismic, or other geological events. Areas susceptible to one or more of the following types of hazards shall be designated as geologically hazardous areas: Landslide hazard, Erosion hazard, and Seismic hazard." Ages Engineering, LLC Page 3 253-945-7000 4.2 Landslide According to the City of Federal Way Municipal Code, landslide hazard areas are defined as "...those areas potentially subject to episodic downslope movement of a mass of soil or rock including but not limited to the following areas: a. Any area with a combination of: 1. Slopes greater than 15 percent; 2. Permeable sediment (predominately sand and gravel) overlying relatively impermeable sediment or bedrock (typically silt and clay); and 3. Springs or groundwater seepage. b. Any area which has shown movement during the Holocene epoch, from 10,000 years ago to the present, or which is underlain by mass wastage debris of that epoch. c. Any area potentially unstable as a result of rapid stream incision, stream bank erosion or undercutting by wave action. d. Any area located in a ravine or on an active alluvial fan, presently or potentially subject to inundation by debris flows or flooding. e. Those areas identified by the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service as having a severe limitation for building site development. f. Those areas mapped as Class U (unstable), UOS (unstable old slides), and URS (unstable recent slides) by the Department of Ecology. g. Slopes having gradients greater than SO percent subject to rockfall during seismic shaking. We did not observe slopes steeper than 15 percent. We observed no areas on the site showing indications of past landslide activity, such as landslide headscarps and sidescarps, hummocky terrain, areas with geologic conditions that can promote earth movement, or areas with signs of potential landsliding, such as springs, groundwater seepage, and bowed or backtilted trees. We did not observe any areas of stream incision, or stream bank erosion. We did not observe any areas with topographic expression of runout zones, such as fans and colluvial deposition at the toes of hillsides. The USDA does not indicate the site has any areas having any building limmitations. The site is classified as Stable by the Department of Ecology. Based on our evaluation, the site is not classified as having landslide Hazard Areas. Provided the site is stabilized after development, surface water is controlled on the site, and all structures are provided with proper subs-ui'ace drainage Measures, the potential for a landslide to occur at this site should be considered negligible. 4.3 Erosion According to the City of Federal Way Municipal Code, erosion hazard areas are defined as "...those areas having severe to very severe erosion hazard due to natural agents such as wind, rain, splash, frost action or stream flow." Based on our evaluation, the site does not contain any areas having a severe or very severe potential for erosion, and therefore does not contain erosion hazard are . Regardless, Temporary Ages Engineernig, LLC Page 4 253-945-7000 Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) measures must be in place prior to and maintained during construction activity at the site. In our opinion, the potential for erosion is not a limiting factor in site development. Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) measures, as required by the City of Federal Way, should be in place prior to the start of construction activities at the site. 4.3 Seismic According to the City of Federal Way Municipal Code, seismic hazard areas are defined as "...those areas subject to severe risk of earthquake damage as a result of seismically induced ground shaking, slope failure, settlement or soil liquefaction, or surface faulting. These conditions occur in areas underlain by cohesionless soils of low density usually in association with a shallow groundwater table". Liquefaction could be described as a phenomenon where there is a reduction or complete loss of soil strength due to an increase in pore water pressure. The increase in water pressure is typically induced by vibrations. Liquefaction mainly affects geologically recent deposits of loose, fine- grained sands that are below the groundwater table. Based on the relative density and relatively high silt content of the soils underlying the site, the risk for liquefaction to occur at the site should be considered very low. The state of Washington has adopted the International Building Code (IBC). Based on the soil conditions encountered and the local geology, per the (IBC) site class "C" can be used in structural design. This is based on the inferred range of SPT (Standard Penetration Test) blow counts for the upper 100 feet of the site relative to hand excavation progress and probing with a Y--inch diameter steel probe rod. We expect glacially consolidated soil conditions are present beneath the site. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 General Based on our study, in our opinion, soil and groundwater conditions at the site are suitable for the proposed development. The new structure can be supported on conventional spread footings bearing on the native medium dense to dense silty sand soils observed at a depth of 1.0 to 2.0 feet below surface grades, or on new structural fill placed above these existing native site soils. Floor slabs and pavements should be similarly supported. The native soils encountered at the site contain a high enough percentage of fines (silt and clay- size particles) that will make them difficult to compact as structural fill when too wet. Accordingly, the ability to use the soils from site excavations as structural fill will depend on their moisture content and the prevailing weather conditions at the time of construction. If grading activities will take place during the winter season, the owner should be prepared to import free -draining granular material for use as structural fill and backfill. Ages Engineering, LLC Page 5 253-845 7000 The following sections provide detailed recommendations regarding these issues and other geotechnical design considerations. These recommendations should be incorporated into the final design drawings and construction specifications. 5.2 Site Preparation and Gradin To prepare the site for construction, all vegetation, organic surface soils, and other deleterious materials including any existing structures, foundations or abandoned utility lines should be stripped and removed from the new development areas. Organic topsoil will not be suitable for use as structural fill, but may be used for limited depths in non-structural areas. The existing organic soils observed in the upper 1.0 to 2.0 feet of the site will not be suitable for support of structural elements. Prior to construction, these organic soils should be removed from under all structural elements. Once clearing and stripping operations are complete, cut and fill operations can be initiated to establish desired grades. In order to achieve proper compaction of structural fill, and to provide adequate foundation and floor slab support, the existing subgrade must be in a stable condition. Prior to placing structural fill, and to prepare the foundation subgrade, all exposed surfaces should be compacted with heavy vibratory compaction equipment to determine if any isolated soft and yielding areas are present. If excessively soft or yielding areas are present, and cannot be stabilized in place by compaction, they should be cut to firm bearing soil and filled to grade with structural fill. If the depth to remove the unsuitable soil is excessive, using a geotextile fabric can be considered, such as Mirafi HP270 or an approved equivalent, in conjunction with structural fill. In general, a minimum of 18-inches of clean, granular structural fill over the geotextile fabric should establish a stable bearing surface. A representative of Ages Engineering, LLC should observe the foundation subgrade compaction operations to verify that stable subgrades are achieved for support of structural elements. Our study indicates the native surface soils encountered at the site contain a sufficient enough percentage of fines (silt and clay -size particles) that will make them difficult to compact as structural fill when too wet. Accordingly, the ability to use the soils from site excavations as structural fill will depend on their moisture content and the prevailing weather conditions at the time of construction. If grading activities are planned during the wet winter months, or the on - site soils become too wet to achieve adequate compaction, the owner should be prepared to import a wet -weather structural fill. For wet weather structural fill, we recommend importing a granular soil that meets the following gradation requirements: U. S. Sieve Size Percent Passing 6 inches 100 No. 4 75 maximum No. 200 1 5 maximum* Based on the'/. inch &action Ages Engineering, LLC Page 6 253-945-7000 Prior to use, Ages Engineering, LLC should examine and test all materials to be imported to the site for use as structural fill. Structural fill should be placed in uniform loose layers not exceeding 12 inches and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the soils' laboratory maximum dry density as determined by American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Test Designation D-1557 (Modified Proctor). The moisture content of the soil at the time of compaction should be within two percent of its optimum, as determined by this same ASTM standard. In non-structural areas, the degree of compaction can be reduced to 90 percent. 5.3 Excavations All excavations at the site associated with confined spaces, such as utility trenches and lower level building and retaining walls, must be completed in accordance with local, state, and/or federal requirements. Based on current Washington State Safety and Health Administration (WSHA) regulations, the organic and native medium dense soils observed in the upper 5.0 feet of the site would be classified as Type C soils. The deeper dense native soils below 5.0 feet would be classified as Type A soils. According to WSHA, for temporary excavations of less than 20 feet in depth, the side slopes in Type C soils should be laid back at a slope inclination of 1.5:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) or flatter from the toe to the crest of the slope and the side slopes in Type A soils should be laid back at a slope inclination of 0.75:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) or flatter from the toe to the crest of the slope. All exposed slope faces should be covered with a durable reinforced plastic membrane during construction to prevent slope raveling and rutting during periods of precipitation. These guidelines assume that all surface loads are kept at a minimum distance of at least one half the depth of the cut away from the top of the excavation slope and that significant seepage is not present on the slope face. Flatter cut slopes will be necessary where significant raveling or seepage occurs, or if construction materials will be stockpiled along the slope crest. If these safe temporary slope inclinations cannot be achieved due to property line constraints, shoring may be necessary. This information is provided solely for the benefit of the owner and other design consultants, and should not be construed to imply that Ages Engineering, LLC assumes responsibility for job site safety. It is understood that job site safety is the sole responsibility of the project contractor. 5.4 Foundations The new residential foundations may be supported on conventional spread footing foundations bearing on the native medium dense to dense silty sand soils observed at a depth of 1.0 to 2.0 feet below surface grades, or on new structural fill placed above these existing native site soils Foundation subgrades should be prepared as recommended in the "Site Preparation and Grading" section of this report. As discussed in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report, The existing organic soils observed in the upper 1.0 to 2.0 feet of the site will not be suitable for Ag- g LLC Page 7 253-945-7000 support of structural elements. Prior to construction, these organic soils should be removed from under new foundation areas. For frost protection, perimeter foundations exposed to the weather should bear at a minimum depth of 1.5 feet below final exterior grades for frost protection. Interior foundations can be constructed at any convenient depth below the floor slab. We recommend designing new foundations for a net allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf). For short- term loads, such as wind and seismic, a one-third increase in this allowable capacity can be used. With the anticipated loads and this bearing stress applied, building settlements should be less than one-half inch total and one -quarter inch differential. For designing foundations to resist lateral loads, a base friction coefficient of 0.35 can be used. Passive earth pressures acting on the sides of the footings can also be considered. We recommend calculating this lateral resistance using an equivalent fluid weight of 325 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). We recommend not including the upper 12 inches of soil in this computation because it can be affected by weather or disturbed by future grading activity. This value assumes the foundations will be constructed neat against competent soil and backfilled with structural fill, as described in the "Site Preparation and Grading" section of this report. The values recommended include a safety factor of 1.5. Foundation Parameter Summa Description *Design Value Net Allowable Bearing Capacity 2,500 psf Friction Coefficient 0.35 Lateral Resistance 325 pcf 'Details regarding the use of these parameters are provided in the section above. 5.5 Slab -On -Grade Slab -on -grade floors should be supported on subgrades prepared as recommended in the "Site Preparation and Grading" section of this report. As discussed in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report, The existing organic soils observed in the upper 1.0 to 2.0 feet of the site will not be suitable for support of structural elements. Prior to construction, these organic soils should be removed from under new slab -on -grade areas. Immediately below the floor slab, we recommend placing a four -inch thick capillary break layer of clean, free -draining, coarse sand or fine gravel that has less than three percent passing the No. 200 sieve. This material will reduce the potential for upward capillary movement of water through the underlying soil and subsequent wetting of the floor slabs. The drainage material should be placed in one lift and compacted to a firm and unyielding condition. The capillary break layer will not prevent moisture intrusion through the slab caused by water vapor transmission. Where moisture by vapor transmission is undesirable, such as covered floor areas, a common practice is to place a durable plastic membrane on the capillary break layer and then cover the membrane with a layer of clean sand or fine gravel to protect it from damage Ages Engineering, LLC Page 8 253-845-7000 during construction, and aid in uniform curing of the concrete slab. It should be noted that if the sand or gravel layer overlying the membrane is saturated prior to pouring the slab, it will not assist in uniform curing of the slab, and may serve as a water supply for moisture transmission through the slab and affecting floor coverings. Additionally, if the sand is too dry, it can effectively drain the fresh concrete, thereby lowering its strength. Therefore, in our opinion, covering the membrane with a layer of sand or gravel should be avoided. 5.6 Lower Level and Building Walls The magnitude of earth pressure development on below -grade walls, such as basement or retaining walls, will greatly depend on the quality of the wall backfill and the wall drainage. We recommend placing and compacting wall backfill as structural fill. Wall backfill below structurally loaded areas, such as pavements or floor slabs, should be compacted to a minimums of 95 percent of its maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-1557 (Modified Proctor). In unimproved areas, the relative compaction can be reduced to 90 percent. To guard against hydrostatic pressure development, drainage must be installed behind the wall. We recommend that wall drainage consist of a minimum 12 inches of clean sand and/or gravel with less than three percent fines placed against the back of the wall. In addition, a drainage collector system consisting of 4-inch perforated PVC pipe should be placed behind the wall to provide an outlet for any accumulated water. The drains should be provided with cleanouts at easily accessible locations. These cleanouts should be serviced at least once every year. The wall drainage material should be capped at the ground surface with 1-foot of relatively impermeable soil to prevent surface intrusion into the drainage zone. Alternatively, the 12-inch wide drainage layer placed against the back of the wall can be replaced with a Mirafi G100N Drainage Board. or an approved equivalent. If drainage board is used, the 4-inch perforated PVC pipe should be covered with at least 12 inches of clean washed gravel and the drainage board should be hydraulically connected to drainpipe and surrounding gravel. With wall backfill placed and compacted as recommended and the wall drainage properly installed, unrestrained walls can be designed for an active earth pressure equivalent to a fluid weighing 35 pc£ For restrained walls, an additional uniform lateral pressure of 100 psf should be included. These values assume a horizontal backfill condition and that no other surcliaige loading, such as traffic, sloping embankments, or adjacent buildings, will act on the wall. If such conditions exist, then the imposed loading must be included in the wall design. Friction at the base of the wall foundation and passive earth pressure will provide resistance to these lateral loads. Values for these parameters are provided in the "Foundations" section of this report. Lower Level Building and Retaining Wall Parameter Summary Description Condition *Design Value Earth Pressure Unrestrained 35 pef Earth Pressure Restrained Additional 100 psf Earth Pressure Surchar e Dependant upon fade *Details regarding the use of these parameters are provided in the section above. Ages Engineering, LLC Page 9 253-845-7000 5.7 Storm Water The storm water collected in the roof and foundation drains can discharge on site. Due to the site containing a water course along its eastern end, the discharged storm water must be uncontaminated. The location of the storm water discharge must consist of a stabilized surface. If the discharge area consists of exposed soil, or the planned site development disturbs the soils at the discharge location, the area will need to have surface stabilization methods applied. Accordingly, the discharge point should be lined with quarry spalls to dissipate the energy of the discharged water. Additionally, the surface of the ground below the discharge point should be stabilized by installing a layer of jute netting, landscape bark, and planting a complete groundcover of low -growing plants. The vegetative ground cover plants should be spaced so the entire area is completely grown -in and covered during the first year of growth. The landscape plan for the site should also entail revegetating the entire site area disturbed during development. The ground cover should extend from the discharge point downhill through all surface areas of exposed soils and/or areas that were disturbed during development. If the vegetative growth on the site is already established at the time development is complete, the quarry rock will still be necessary, however the recommended vegetative measures may not be necessary. 5.8 Site Drainage Surface, Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage away from the building area All ground surfaces, pavements, and sidewalks should be sloped away from the structure. We recommend providing a gradient of at least three percent for a minimum distance of ten feet from the building perimeter, except in paved locations. In paved locations, a minimum gradient of one percent should be provided, unless provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the structure. Subsurface, We recommend installing a continuous drain along the lower outside edge of the perimeter building foundation. The foundation drain should be tightiined to an approved point of controlled discharge. The roof drain should not be connected to the footing drains unless a backflow device will be installed, or an adequate gradient will prevent bacldlow into the footing drains. Subsurface drains must be laid with a gradient sufficient to promote positive flow to the point of discharge. All drains should be provided with cleanouts at easily accessible locations. These cleanouts should be serviced at least once every year. Ages En&mii g, LLC Page 10 253-845-7000 6.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Ages Engineering, LLC should review the final project designs and specifications in order to verify that earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and incorporated into project design. If changes are made in the loads, grades, locations, configura- tions or types of facilities to be constructed, the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report may not be fully applicable. If such changes are made, we should be given the opportunity to review our recommendations and provide written modifications or verifications, as necessary. We should also provide geotechnical services during construction to observe compliance with our design concepts, specifications, and recommendations. This will allow for expedient design changes if subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. 7.0 LIMITATIONS We prepared this report in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report is the copyrighted property of Ages Engineering, LLC and is intended for the exclusive use of Mr. Subhash Sharma and his authorized representatives for use in the design, permitting, and construction portions of this project. The analysis and recommendations presented in this report are based on data obtained from others and our site explorations, and should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. Variations in subsurface conditions are possible. The nature and extent of which may not become evident until the time of construction. If variations appear evident, Ages Engineering, LLC should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations in this report prior to proceeding with construction. A contingency for unanticipated subsurface conditions should be included in the budget and schedule. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation should be provided by our firm during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated during our exploration, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract plans and specifications. The scope of our services does not include services related to environmental remediation and construction safety precautions. Our reconunendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Ages Engineering, LLC Page 11 253-845-7000 Cly 198 SN.' 2941h SI Federal Wa Federal W-M Pr.'; er1 y eev PA4 SW 3121h St r SW 320th St -13,62163637 024 5,998,547 Owls pi 1 Approximate Site Location Ages Engineering, LLB` P. O. Box 935 Puyallup, WA. 98371 Mein (253) 945-7000 www.ages engl n e c n rtg .00m Federal Way S 312th Site Vicinity Map SW 294' Avenue Residential 200 - SW 294'h Street Federal Way, Washington Project No.: A-1313 1 January 2017 1 Figure 1 t� 01 T r �! f U - A . 5 i. VU * - ` • +' -FV ". :K . Y Lr r L KEY: APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEST HOLE 7 H- I A(Yes L LC P. 0. Box 935 Puyallup_ WA.98371 Main (253) 845-7000 w%vzr.age,en&eerin& coin Exploration Location Plan SW 294" Avenue Residential 200 - SW 294`' Street Federal Way, Washington Project No.: A-1313 January 2017 Figure 2 Approximate Site Location I-Pr3t- Ages Engineering, P. O. Box 935 Puyallup, WA. 98371 Main (253) 945-7000 www.agescnginecre ng. com LLC Geologic Map SW 2941 Avenue Residential 200 - SW 294" Street Federal Way, Washington Project No.: A 1313 I January 2017 1 Figure 3 u VI5 r� u ��y}� i Approximate Site Location Ages Engineering, LLC P_ O. Box 935 Puyallup, WA. 98371 Main (253) 845-7000 www.zigeseng.intLTlng.com i � � a . M N Coastal Zone Atlas Map SW 2941 Avenue Residential 200 - SW 2941h Street Federal Way, Washington Project No.: A-1313 January 2017 Figure 4 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING SW 294" Street Residential Federal Way, Washington On December 19, 2016, we explored subsurface conditions at the site by excavating 2 hand -augured test holes to a maximum depth of 8.0 feet below surface grades. The approximate test pit locations are shown on Figure 2. The test pit logs are presented on Figure A-2. A geotechnical engineer from our office conducted the field exploration, maintained a log of each test hole, classified the soils encountered, collected representative soil samples, and observed pertinent site features. All soil samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) described on Figure A-1. Representative soil samples obtained from the test holes were placed in sealed containers and taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing. The moisture content of each sample was measured and is reported on the test pit logs. Project No_ 1313 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME GRAVEL GW Well -Graded GRAVEL GRAVEL WITH < 5 % FINES - GRAVEL GP GW-GM Poorly -Graded GRAVEL Well -Graded GRAVEL with silt GW-GC Well -Graded GRAVEL with clay WITH More than 50% BETWEEN 5 AND 15 % GP -GM Poorly -Graded GRAVEL with silt COARSE Of Coarse Fraction Retained on FINES GP -GC Poorly -Graded GRAVEL with clay GRAINED No. 4 Sieve GM GRAVEL Silty GRAVEL SOILS WITH > 15 % FINES -- GC Clayey GRAVEL SAND SW Well -Graded SAND More than 50016 Retained on No. 200 Sieve SAND WITH < 5 % FINES SP Poorly -Graded SAND SAND SW-SM Well -Graded SAND with silt SW -SC Well -Graded SAND with clay WITH More than 50% Of Coarse Fraction Passes BETWEEN 5 AND 15 % FINES SP-SM Poorly -Graded SAND with silt SP-SC Poorly -Graded SAND with clay No. 4 Sieve SAND SM Silty SAND WITH > 15 % FINES SC Clayey SAND FINE GRAINED Liquid Limit Less than 50 MI, Inorganic SILT with low plasticity CL Lean inorganic CLAY with low plasticity _ - OL Organic SILT with low plasticity SOILS SILT AND Elastic inorganic SILT with moderate to high plasticity CLAY More than 50% Passes Liquid Limit 50 or more CH Fat inorganic CLAY with moderate to high plasticity OH Organic SILT or CLAY with moderate to high plasticity No. 200 Sieve HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES (1) Soil descriptions are based on visual field and laboratory observations using the classification methods described in ASTM D-2488. Where laboratory data are available, classifications are in accordance with ASTM D-2487. (2) Solid lines between soil descriptions indicate a change in the interpreted geologic unit. Dashed lines indicate stratigraphic change within the unit. (3) Fines are material passing the U.S. No. 200 Sieve. Ages Engineering, LLC P. U_ Box 935 Puyallup, WA 98371 Main (253) 845-7000 www.agesengineerwg.com Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) SW 2941 Street Residential 200 — SW 2941h Street Federal Way, Washington Project No.: A-1313 i January 2017 1 Figure A-1 ■ ■ P_0. Box 935 Ages Engineering■J LLC Office (p,W .983 1 Test Hole TH-1 DATE: December 19, 2016 LOGGED BY: BPK Depth Soil Description Notes (feet) Ma/o Other 0 .;oiZ_ moist. ioo. 5 Light brown silty SAND, some fine gravel, slight cementation, moist, medium dense. (SM) Grayish -tan mottled reddish -orange silty SAND, some gravel, slight cementation, moist to wet, dense. (SM) No mottling below 7.0 feet Test Hole terminated at a depth of 8.0 feel below surface grades. No groundwater seepage encountered. Test Hole TH-2 DATE: December 19. 2016 LOGGED BY: BPK ELEV: Depth Soil Description Notes (feet) M% I Other 0 I Medium brown mottled reddish -orange silty SAND, some tine gravel, slight cementation, moist to wet, medium dense. (SM) Grayish -tan silty SAND with gravel, slight cementation, moist, dense. (SM) Test Hole terminated at a depth of 8.0 feet below surface grades. No groundwater seepage eneowitered. Figure A-2 PmjmtNo.: A-1313 SITE PLAN CONTROL NOXIOUS WEEDS AND INSTALL NATIVE PLANTS SITE AND PLANTING PLAN NOTES: N 88'58'26" W 100.00' I \\ I 16,I i 6" o W-5 Iw 1 O" �A 0 0 12" W \\��W CATEGORY IV WETLAND 40' ��- WETLAND BUFFER _3 OH P - -• •Y •Y EKG ECO y BLOCK WALL W-1 E-1 ; - A-1 18" � 17» 1. THE SITE PLAN USED TO PREPARE THIS DRAWING WAS PROVIDED BY URBAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC (33505 13TH PLACE, STE D - FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003). SOURCE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN MODIFIED FOR VISUAL ENHANCEMENT. 2. PRIOR TO PLANT INSTALLATION, CONTROL NOXIOUS WEEDS PER THE SPECIFICATIONS INCLUDED ON THIS SHEET. 3. PRIOR TO PLANT INSTALLATION REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS FROM PLANTING AREAS. 4. PLANT MATERIAL QUALITY AND LOCATIONS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY PLAN DESIGNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3. PROTECT AND ACCOMMODATE EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION WITHIN ALL PLANTING AREAS. PLANT LOCATIONS SHOWN IN PLANTING PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. UNDER DIRECTION OF PLAN DESIGNER, PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN BUFFER AREAS WHERE NATIVE PLANTS CURRENTLY DO NOT EXIST. 4. FOLLOWING PLANT INSTALLATION, PLACE MULCH AT BASE OF PLANTS TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. SITE PLAN, PLANTING PLAN, PLANT SCHEDULE, & NOTES SCALE AS SHOWN 5" MIN. DIA. ROUGH 10' MAX CUT WOOD RAIL - UNTREATED (TYP) CRITICAL AREA SIG EVERY 50 FEET. 12" - 18" O O 3' MIN. MOUND TO O O DRAIN AWAY FROM POST 6" MIN. DIA. SQUARE OR ROUND ROUGH CUT WOOD In POST - UNTREATED (TYP) //��/ 5/$" MINUS CRUSHED ROCK O \ BACKFILL. COMPACT TO 95% 2 MIN. `�/\7/ - MIN. DENSITY \ \ \� NATIVE SOIL 0 10 20 SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. PLANTING SCHEMATIC - TYPICAL. REPRESENTS 2,500 SF OF PLANTING AREA WESTERN REDCEDAR (THUJA PLICATA) RED ELDERBERRY (SAMBUCUS RACEMOSA) INDIAN PLUM (OEMLERIA CERASFORMIS) DOUGLAS-FIF (PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII; TWINBERRY HONEYSUCKL (LONICERA INVOLURCRAT) BLACK HAWTHORNE (CRATAEGUS DOUGLASII) PLANT SCHEDULE 50 FT COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE/FORM QTY NOTES DOUGLAS-FIR PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII 2 GALLON CONTAINERIZED 11 6 FT TO 9 FT ON -CENTER WESTERN REDCEDAR THUJA PLICATA 2 GALLON CONTAINERIZED 10 6 FT TO 9 FT ON -CENTER BLACK HAWTHORNE CRATAEGUS DOUGLASII 2 GALLON CONTAINERIZED 10 4 FT TO 6 FT OC; GROUPS OF 3 TO 8 TWINBERRY HONEYSUCKLE LONICERA INVOLURCRATA 2 GALLON CONTAINERIZED 10 4 FT TO 6 FT OC; GROUPS OF 3 TO 8 INDIAN PLUM OEMLERIA CERASFORMIS 2 GALLON CONTAINERIZED 15 4 FT TO 6 FT OC; GROUPS OF 3 TO 8 RED ELDERBERRY SAMBUCUS RACEMOSA 2 GALLON CONTAINERIZED 11 4 FT TO 6 FT OC; GROUPS OF 3 TO 8 TOTAL PLANTS = 67 PLANT MATERIAL SOURCE AND SPECIFICATIONS: 1. PLANTS SHALL BE DERIVED FROM STOCK ACCLIMATED TO WESTERN WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, 2. PLANTS SHALL BE NATIVE TO THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST, PREFERABLY THE PUGET SOUND REGION OF WASHINGTON STATE. PLANTS SHALL BE PROPAGATED FROM NATIVE STOCK; NO CULTIVARS OR HORTICULTURAL VARIETIES ARE ALLOWED. SALVAGED PLANTS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. 3. PLANTS SHALL BE NORMAL IN PATTERN OF GROWTH, HEALTHY, WELL -BRANCHED AND HAVE ALL LEADERS AND BUDS INTACT. TREES SHALL NOT HAVE SUNSCALDS, DISFIGURING KNOTS, FRESH CUTS OF LIMBS, DAMAGED LEADERS, AND/OR DEFORMED TRUNKS. 4. CONTAINERIZED PLANT STOCK SHALL BE GROWN IN A CONTAINER LONG ENOUGH TO DEVELOP A ROOT SYSTEM THAT REACHES THE EDGES OF THE CONTAINER IN WHICH IT HAS GROWN. TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE WELL ROOTED AND SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT ROOT MASS TO HOLD TOGETHER THE SOIL, IN WHICH PLANT IS GROWING, WHEN REMOVED FROM THE POT. NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL: PRIOR TO PLANT INSTALLATION, CONTROL NOXIOUS WEEDS WITHIN THE PLANTING AREA. TARGET NOXIOUS WEED SPECIES SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: ALL CLASS "A", "B", AND "C" NOXIOUS WEEDS (INCLUDING NON -REGULATED "B" AND "C" NOXIOUS WEEDS AND "WEEDS OF CONCERN") IDENTIFIED ON THE LATEST KING COUNTY NOXIOUS WEED LIST. DURING NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL WORK, EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE. ALL NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL CUTTINGS AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. CONTROL METHODS (KNOTWEED): 1. APPLY GLYPHOSATE BASED HERBICIDE TO LEAVES USING SMALL HAND HELD OR BACKPACK SPRAYER AND APPROPRIATE DYE AND SURFACANT. HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS SHALL OCCUR IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO OR DURING FLOWER BUD STAGE ( TYPICALLY 1ULY/AUGUST). 2. REMOVE DEAD TOP GROWTH USING MACHETE, LOPPERS, OR PRUNING SHEARS AND GRUB OUT LARGE ROOT CROWNS AND MAJOR ROOTS BY HAND USING CLAW MATTOCK, PULASKI, OR APPROVED EQUAL. COLLECT ALL CUTTINGS/ROOTS AND DISPOSE OF AS HOUSEHOLD WASTE. CONTROL METHODS (OTHERS): 1. REDUCE TOP GROWTH USING A POWER SAW, BRUSH HOG, LINE TRIMMER, LOPPERS, CLIPPERS, HAND PULLING, OR APPROVED EQUAL. GRUB OUT LARGE ROOT CROWNS AND MAJOR ROOTS BY HAND USING CLAW MATTOCK, PULASKI, OR APPROVED EQUAL. CRITICAL AREA I NON -BUFFER BUFFER CRITICAL AREA FENCE NOTES: 1. FENCE SHALL BE COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE POST AND RAIL SYSTEM PER THE ABOVE MIN. SPECIFICATIONS. 2. WODD SHALL BE WESTERN REDCEDAR OR EQUAL. CRITICAL AREA FENCE AND SIGNAGE INSTALLATION DETAIL NO SCALE :E CRITICAL AREA SIGN NOTES: 1. SIGN CONTENT SHOWN IS REPRESENTATIVE IN NATURE. FINAL SIGN CONTENT, COLOR, AND MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO CITY OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARDS. 2. SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED AT THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE CRITICAL AREA (WETLAND OR STREAM) BUFFER FACING AWAY FROM THE CRITICAL AREA. 3. SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED EVERY 50 LF. 4. ATTACH SIGN TO FENCE USING 5/16" DIA. GALVANIZED LAG BOLT. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SPECIAL NOTES: 1. ANY PERMITTED CLEARING AND GRADING ACTIVITIES WITHIN A STREAM OR STREAM BUFFER AREA SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION. 2. GRADING IS ALLOWED ONLY DURING THE DRY SEASON (MAY 1ST TO OCTOBER 1ST). THE DIRECTOR MAY EXTEND OR SHORTEN THE DRY SEASON ON A CASE -BY -CASE BASIS, DETERMINED ON ACTUAL WEATHER CONDITIONS 3. THE SOIL DUFF LAYER SHALL REMAIN UNDISTURBED TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE. WHERE FEASIBLE, ANY SOIL DISTURBED SHALL BE REDISTRIBUTED TO OTHER AREAS OF THE PROJECT AREA. 4. THE MOISTURE -HOLDING CAPACITY OF THE TOPSOIL LAYER SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY MINIMIZING SOIL COMPACTION OR REESTABLISHING NATURAL SOIL STRUCTURE AND INFILTRATIVE CAPACITY ON ALL AREAS OF THE PROJECT AREA NOT COVERED BY IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. 5. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL THAT MEETS REQUIREMENTS OF FWRC TITLE 16. 6. ALL FILL MATERIAL USED MUST BE NONDISSOLVING AND NONDECOMPOSING. THE FILL MATERIAL MUST NOT CONTAIN ORGANIC OR INORGANIC MATERIAL THAT WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO WATER QUALITY OR THE EXISTING HABITAT. 7. THE APPLICANT MAY DEPOSIT DREDGE SPOILS ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ONLY IF PART OF AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 8. THE APPLICANT SHALL STABILIZE ALL AREAS LEFT EXPOSED AFTER CLEARING AND GRADING ACTIVITIES WITH NATIVE VEGETATION NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE STREAM OR BUFFER AREA. MULCH SPECIFICATION: MULCH SHALL BE COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE "DOT WOODCHIP MULCH" (WWW.PACIFICTOPSOILS.COM; 425-337-2700), ARBORIST CHIPS, OR APPROVED EQUAL. MULCH SHALL NOT CONTAIN RESIN, TANNIN, OR OTHER COMPOUNDS IN QUANTITIES THAT WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO PLANT LIFE. MULCH SHALL NOT BE DERIVED FROM STUMP GRINDINGS AND SHALL NOT CONTAIN SOIL. HOG FUEL OR EQUAL IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE PLAN DESIGNER, LOCAL ARBORIST AND/OR COMMERCIAL TREE TRIMMING COMPANIES MAY BE ALTERNATIVE ACCEPTABLE MATERIAL SOURCES (WWW.DROPCHIP.IN). NATIVE SOIL MIN. 1.5 TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE ROOTBALL PLANT INSTALLATION DETAIL NO SCALE BACKFILL WITH NATIVE SOIL. COMPACT BY HAND. MONITORING & MAINTENANCE PLAN PLAN PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: CONTINGENCY PLAN: PLAN GOALS/OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ARE OUTLINED SHOULD ANY COMPLIANCE MONITORING ASSESSMENT REVEAL THAT THE BELOW. THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THIS PLAN ARE CONSIDERED ACHIEVED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR THE RESPECTIVE YEAR ARE NOT SATISFIED, THE WHEN THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ARE SATISFIED. PERMITTEE SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY TO DEVELOP A CONTINGENCY PLAN TO ADDRESS THE DEFICIENCY(IES). CONTINGENCY PLANS CAN MONITORING PLAN (DURATION = 5 YEARS): INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS: AS -BUILT 1. ADDITIONAL PLANT INSTALLATION; 2. EROSION CONTROL; SCHEDULE: IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION 3. HERBIVORY PROTECTION; 4. MODIFICATION TO THE IRRIGATION REGIME; AND/OR FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE WORK SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, A QUALIFIED 5. PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS OF TYPE, SIZE, QUANTITY, AND LOCATION. PROFESSIONAL SHALL PREPARE AN AS -BUILT. THE AS -BUILT SHALL SUMMARIZE THE COMPLETED WORK AS WELL AS ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED SUCH CONTINGENCY PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BY VERSION OF THIS PLAN. JANUARY 31 OF ANY YEAR WHEN DEFICIENCIES ARE DISCOVERED. UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, ACTIONS SPECIFIED ON AN IN ADDITION TO THE AS -BUILT, BASELINE MONITORING DATA SHALL BE APPROVED CONTINGENCY PLAN MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 60 DAYS. IF THE COLLECTED AND PERMANENT PHOTO POINT HALL BE ESTABLISHED TO O S S AL WAY Y FAILURE IS SUBSTANTIAL, THE CITY OF FEDERAL MAY EXTEND THE DOCUMENT REPRESENTATIVE CONDITIONS WITHIN THE ENHANCED BUFFER MONITORING PERIOD FOR THE WORK SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. AREA. BASELINE MONITORING DATA AND PHOTOGRAPHS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THAT DESCRIBED FOR "ANNUAL MONITORING" (SEE BELOW). MAINTENANCE PLAN: THE AS -BUILT AND BASELINE MONITORING DATA SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY NO LATER THAN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE THAT THE WORK SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THE ENHANCED BUFFER SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT REGULAR INTERVALS DURING THE MONITORING PERIOD TO PROMOTE THE SUCCESSFUL ESTABLISHMENT AND ANNUAL MONITORING (S YEARS) VIGOROUS GROWTH OF THE INSTALLED PLANT STOCK. SCHEDULE: ANNUALLY FOR 5 YEARS FOLLOWING PLANT INSTALLATION. GENERAL MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE: FOLLOWING ACCEPTANCE OF THE AS -BUILT, ANNUAL MONITORING SHALL BE 1. WEEDING THE BASE OF INSTALLED PLANTS. COMPLETED FOR A PE D OF FIVE (5) YEARS. ANNUAL MONITORING SHALL BE 2. RE -APPLYING BARK MULCH TO MAINTAIN A 6" MINIMUM APPLIED COMPLETED BY A Q LIFIED PROFESSIONAL AND SHALL COMPRISE DETAILED THICKNESS - AS -NEEDED AFTER YEAR 1. SITE ASSESSMENTS THE LATE GROWING SEASON (AUGUST/SEPTEMBER), WITH 3. THE PRUNING OF INSTALLED PLANTS TO REMOVE DEAD WOOD AND REPORTING TO THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY NO LATER THAN 30 DAYS PROMOTE VIGOROUS PLANT GROWTH AND PROPER FORM. FOLLOWING EACH DETAILED SITE ASSESSMENT. 4. THE REPLACEMENT OF PLANTS THAT APPEAR TO BE IN DISTRESS AND/OR DISEASED. THE PURPOSE OF ANNUAL MONITORING IS TO EVALUATE SITE CONDITIONS PER THE CURRENT YEAR'S PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. THE FOLLOWING GENERAL MAINTENANCE WORK SHALL OCCUR MONTHLY DURING THE GROWING INFORMATION SHALL BE COLLECTED AND ASSESSED RELATIVE TO THE SEASON AND/OR AT A FREQUENCY OTHERWISE NECESSARY TO ENSURE THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED FOR THE PROJECT: SUCCESSFUL ESTABLISHMENT AND VIGOROUS GROWTH OF THE INSTALLED PLANTS AND/OR THE CONTROL OF NOXIOUS WEEDS. • THE PERCENT SURVIVAL OF INSTALLED PLANT STOCK (ALL YEARS). A DIRECT COUNT INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT OF ALL INSTALLED PLANTS NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL SHALL BE USED TO EVALUATE PERCENT SURVIVAL. THE RATIONALE FOR POOR CONDITIONS, IF PRESENT, WILL BE DETERMINED TO THE EXTENT FOLLOWING PLANT INSTALLATION AND AT REGULAR INTERVALS DURING THE FEASIBLE. MONITORING PERIOD, NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL SHALL OCCUR ON A SPOT TREATMENT BASIS WITHIN EACH WORK AREA. • THE SPECIES COMPOSITION OF AND PERCENT COVERAGE PROVIDED BY NOXIOUS WEED SPECIES (ALL YEARS). SPECIES COMPOSITION AND TARGET NOXIOUS WEED SPECIES SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: ALL CLASS "A", PERCENT COVERAGE BY NOXIOUS WEEDS SHALL BE ASSESSED USING "B", AND "C" NOXIOUS WEEDS (INCLUDING NON -REGULATED "B" AND "C" SAMPLE PLOTS OR LINE INTERCEPT TRANSECTS . NOXIOUS WEEDS) IDENTIFIED ON THE LATEST KING COUNTY NOXIOUS WEED LIST. IN ADDITION TO THE DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS REGARDING PLANT NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL WORK SHALL CONSIST OF THE CUTTING AND REMOVAL COMMUNITY CONDITIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE ENHANCED BUFFER AREA FROM THE SITE OF ALL NOXIOUS WEED SPECIES STEMS, CANES, RUNNERS, SHOOTS, SHALL BE TAKEN FROM THE PERMANENT PHOTO POINTS ESTABLISHED DURING SEED PODS, FRUITING BODIES, AND LEAVES PER THE FOLLOWING METHODS: THE AS -BUILT. 1. HAND PULLING. ANNUAL MONITORING REPORTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF FEDERAL 2. MANUALLY CUTTING USING MACHETES, LOPPERS, AND/OR CLIPPERS. WAY NO LATER THAN OCTOBER 31 OF THE RESPECTIVE MONITORING YEAR. SPOT TREATMENT SHALL OCCUR MONTHLY AND/OR AT A GREATER FREQUENCY, IF NECESSARY, TO CONTROL NOXIOUS WEED SPECIES TO A MAXIMUM OF 10% OR LESS COVERAGE. DURING ALL NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL WORK, EXISTINFREWONT 'E NATIVE VEGETATION SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE. FEB 2 2 2018 TABLE 1- GOALS/OBJECTIVES, MONITORING SCHEDULE, & PERFORMANCE STANDARDS CITY OF FEDERAL. WAY GOAL/OBJECTIVE MONITORING SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO SUCCESSFULLY ESTABLISH A NATIVE UPLAND PLANT LATE SUMMER OF • 100% SURVIVAL BY INSTALLED PLANT STOCK AFTER THE FIRST GROWING COMMUNITY BY INSTALLING 126 NATIVE PLANTINGS YEARS 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5 SEASON. THIS STANDARD CAN BE MET THROUGH PLANT ESTABLISHMENT OR WITHIN 5,353 SF OF ON -SITE BUFFER REPLANTING, AS NECESSARY, TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED PLANT NUMBERS. • 85% SURVIVAL BY INSTALLED PLANT STOCK AFTER THE SECOND THROUGH TO LIMIT NOXIOUS WEED SPECIES WITHIN ON -SITE BUFFER LATE SUMMER OF FIFTH GROWING SEASONS. AREAS BY MINIMIZING THE GENERAL PRESENCE OF NOXIOUS YEARS 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5 • LESS THAN 10% COVERAGE BY ALL CLASS "A", "B", AND "C" NOXIOUS WEEDS WEEDS DURING THE MONITORING PERIOD. (INCLUDING NON -REGULATED "B" AND "C" NOXIOUS WEEDS) IDENTIFIED ON THE LATEST KING COUNTY NOXIOUS WEED LIST. Ln V Ln O m In !aA O0 M N ++ 3 0 Vf .c° � a O N O 00 _ °' m +=0,, a ao W Nl 3 W m N O 00 00 x 0 m O a J F_ z W Z V N Z" J W Q a p m N to Q Z W W W cc U V) 2Q W V � Z Q z O N z Z Q V) W < W Q W � � W 0 Q U. o- o 00 0 WN LL. � o mix LL' `° w a F_ Ln N z W -J W pp N CC LU Q a Oc t_ o Q C a to N t- to ggCL 01=t~ U to Ln t/1 >- � � � U z z z W cr_ or W w w w w rn w w w w Fcn to to to O w w w w Z tr W m 0:: r\r-r,00 W 0 0 0 0 Q C0 d e 4 N p O O N O i- W t)0 N O O O O Z r4 N M 4 DATE: 06/19/2017 JOB NUMBER: 17-127 Site Plan, Planting Plan, Notes, & Details SHEET: 1 OF 1 For vegetation reclamation otes-and details see Buffer Enhancement Plan sheet 1, by Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. ' Proffer line 9 7 , �\ - I r 5'' e — t ' I 50' buffer t H 0 US E r O OT Line PRINT 1,500 SF I � I I I � L Proposed 3 99 r building footprint i 100ov \'�\ 0"A 40— OT WETLAND &UUFFERll 50—FOOT STREAM B UFF ■ 16( 1 2",20"Ma 1 4", 20" AI 10 6 "Al r A-12 Al A � I 8J� 4 y9�7 99g1 � , E 3 - ° -0-_ _ x OH OH — PLANT SCHEDULE Botanical Name/Common Name Trees Crataegus douglasii (Black Hawthorne) Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas Fir) Thuja plicata (Western Red Cedar) Shrubs Lonicera involucrata (Black Twinberry) Oemteria cerasiformis (Indian Plum) Sambucus racemosa (Red Elderberry) PROJECT NOTES: Qty. Size. Spacing Notes 23 2 gal. 4' o.c. Nursery grown 25 2 gat. 6' o.c. Nursery grown 19 2 gat. 6' o.c. Nursery grown 18 2 gal. 4' o.c. Nursery grown 21 2 gat. 4' o.c. Nursery grown 20 2 gal 5' o.c. Nursery grown 1. Existing trees to be removed are shown on the plan. The proposed residence is located so as to minimize the amount of existing tree removal. 2. Evaluation of home site shows that the building footprint is small compared to similar lots and tree ratios in the neighborhood. It is recommended that the fencing requirement be waived or reduced. Buffer planting enhancement will suffice the requirements stated. 3. All landscape areas will be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system or by hand. 4. Drip irrigation is recommended for all tree, shrub and ground cover beds, and spray heads are recommended for lawn areas. 5. Contractor/Owner is responsible for providing at least 55 PSI for irrigation and providing backflow prevention assembly (per City requirements). PROJECT TIMETABLE: 1. Demolition and Clearing Phase: Starts January 1, 2018 - Ends March 15, 2018 2. Construction Phase: March 15, 2018 - Ends September 15, 2018 3. Planting Ft Reclamation Phase: Starts September 15, 2018 - ends December 15, 2018 STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT W. ALAN BURKE CERTIFICATE No. 549 Revised on: Proposed plants moved away 1 /24/18 from new Mg. footprint Revised on: x Revised on: x 0 1/2 1 2 1 1 1 NEEi Scale: 1" = 10' 50, BUFFER our r tK AKLA 100.00, SIDE YARD SETBACK I I I I I I i 1 I I 1 J I / / I / / I 22 —519 1 27 —7 99 14'-5,) �— WETLAND STREAM j \ \ � I U J3 \> / W X tN a� r JGSE H D R I CULVERT I / IE= 109.5�. �_J — --ONC I I I I I L Q� I — CULVERT — IE= 1 1 1 .12. 12" DIA. z r Q z z 0 W HQ > — Occ D Li �>� QL G pq Q w Q O o j' RECEIVE MAY 0 4 2017 SITS Ann P�SS0 QTYOF 293XX 2 D A V E SW, FEDERAL WA COMMUN17 PROJECT DATA: ZONE: RS9.6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BUENNA ADD & POR VAC ST ADJ PLat Block: 15 Plat Lot: 29 THRU 32 PARCEL: 1169001285 5*2* 17 LOT SIZE: 17,000-SF = 0.39-ACRES 40 N� 0 �U) IMPERVIOUS AREA: mmmQ —J TT BUILDING: 1800 SF0� �") DRIVEWAY, SIDEWALK, PATIO: 600 SF �� i . ■ I M TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: 2400 SF it NN YARDS: REQUIRED o � FRONT 10'-0" W a SIDE 5'-051 W SIDE 20'-099 Z REAR 5'-0" P M Z w mo °° w N Q A * U aQ somaZ (, M Q Lo w LEGEND: o0 � �� STOCK PILE------------------- TOPSOIL, SEEDING, © m /�� W MULCHED-------- 0 CONSTRUCTION ENTRY ------------- SILT FENCE-------------- W CLEARING LIMITS-------- a DRAINAGE DIRECTION--------- 2"-4" DECIDUOUS TREE-------- � -------- `- 2"-4 ' EVERG-BEEN i R_E-------------- V U LO 00 Q CO CV O O00 I SW 294th ST '� C ASPHALT N a g `J -- — o a co fa W a' a BY: B.T. DATE: 4/19/2017 CHECKED: B.T. SHEET NO. SITE PLAN JOB NO. 17=34AE Ar 1 00.0' 12",20"Ma -- Property line j ` 1 0 99 1 99 r - -a--- 9 U , 7n P i F ? - - --- ------ ------------- 10 F;r i I -;7L 71, - ----- — Q /I i 0 7 I Ill 3 3 9 Provide protective / U 2 fencing, see Tree ( Stream v Protection Fencing centerline Detail / �\ 1 I" Fr i� ♦ I \ ,w-8 1 (_ �93AI - 16 Al ���� 14 20"AI F r�� 1 5 ! i — / —7 � ' 1 33 \ 1 0 AI I I 50'stream 1 HOUSE FOOT \ 1 699 AI I,+ buffer line , P R I N T 1,500 S F12 j 1\0 I— 9. 6 A 12 A � `5 r 99 Proposed 1 I 1 d Al walkways ! �r \ W-5 1J II ,, / v 1! ' .E- L `V i- r 9 100.0. 12390 ICC-1N� IE= i 1 2,0 CPS No disturbance zone shal be equal to the critical root zone which is defined as 12" radius for every 1" of tree diamete measured at the d.b.h. EXISTING TREE LEGEND (De) Deciduous Tree (Fr) Fruit Tree (Hm) Hemlock Ex. tree to be removed Revised on: 4/17/18 Revised on: 4/3/18 Revised on: 2/7/18 Revised on: 1/24/18 TREE RETENTION TABLE ubhash Property, Parcel No. 1196001285, Single Family Residential Zone RS9.6 xisting Trees To Be Removed On Site Tree Size dbh (diameter at breast height - 4.5') Tees Tree Units Total Units 1" to 6" dbh 8 x 1.0 8 >6"to12"dbh 14 x1.5 21 >12"to18"dbh 1 x2.0 2 >18"to24"dbh x2.5 > 24" dbh x 3.0 Total = 23 Total Units = 31 Existing Trees To Be Retained On Site Tree Size dbh (diameter at breast height - 4.5') Trees Tree Units Total Units 1" to 6" dbh 10 x 1.0 10 > 6" to 12" dbh 24 x 1.5 36 >12"to18"dbh 15 x2.0 30 > 18"to24"dbh 3 x2.5 7 >24"dbh 1 x3.0 3 Total = 53 Total Units = 86 Lot Size: 17,000 Sf. or .39 Ac. 5 Tree Units Per Ac. Required To Be Retained alculations: 39 Ac. x 25 Tree Units = 10 Tree Units Required xisting Tree Units To Be Retained = 86 Units, No Replacement Tree Units Needed Existing Tree Units To Be Removed = 31 Units Limits of no —, disturbance zone (critical root zone) Notes: Temporary T height, chain Link fence installed prior to starting construction Plan View Signage shalt be attached to the fence which states 'TREE PROTECTION FENCE - No soil disturbance, parking, storage, dumping, or burning of materials is allowed within the Tree Protection Fence." 1) No soil disturbance, parking, storage, dumping, burning of materials, impervious surfaces, fill, excavation, or storage of construction materials shall be permitted within the no disturbance area. 2) If the grade level around the tree is to be raised by more than one foot, a rock well shalt be constructed. The inside diameter of the rock well shall be equal to the diameter of the tree trunk plus 10 feet. Proper drainage, and irrigation if necessary, shalt be provided in all rock wells. 3) The grade level shalt not be lowered within the larger of the drip line of the tree(s) or the critical root zone of the tree(s). 4) No trenching is allowed in any critical tree root zone areas. 5) No installation of any impervious surfaces is allowed in critical root zones. Where road or sidewalk surfaces are needed within critical root zones, unmortared porous pavers or flagstone (rather than concrete or asphalt) may be used. Boardwalks or bridging may span root zones without harming the tree roots. 6) Tree protection areas (i.e., critical root zone) must be prepared to better withstand the stresses of the construction phase by, if necessary, fertilizing, pruning, and mulching around them well in advance of beginning any construction activities. 7) Alternative protection methods may be used if accepted by the director to provide equal or greater tree protection. 8) Encroachment into the no disturbance area may be allowed where the director determines encroachment would not be detrimental to the health of the tree. Tree Protection Fencing Detail NTS ad�n� STATE OF WASH I NGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT W. ALAN BURKE CERTIFICATE No. 549 Added plants to disturbed area, noted square footage of plant areas, L2 Added L.A. signature, revised date Reduced proposed plant enhancement area and quantities Building footprint changed 0 1/2 1 2 Scale: 1" = 19 Cla551'c Nur5er� i !f: pe Co. Woodinville,Place. •fig • Ili Reviewed - • n 15urLe Tree Retention Plat -AY 1 2018 Et Detai is CITY of FEDERAL w, Sharma Subhash Property COMMUNIT r DEvELOM 293xx 2nd Ave SW, Federal Way, Wa. 98023 Parcel #1196001285 Designed By: ARW Landscape Design Amy Wolfe, Owner 253.223.1162 amy@arwiandscapedesign.com www.arwiandscapedesign.com Project #: 1817 Date: 4/17/18 Sheet Size / Scale: 22"x34" 1 " = 10' N L1 of 2