The URL can be used to link to this page

19-102396 (2)CITY OF Federal Way Centered on opportunity pP y July 31, 2019 Ms. Tanya Shablevskiy 2940 57N1 Avenue NE Tacoma, WA 98422 ufflja�� RESUBMITTED NOV 0 g 2019 CITY OF FEbERA! WAY COWUNfTY DEVEIOPM,EW Re: File #19-102396-UP; PROCESS III TECHNICAL REVIEW Shablevsldy Wetland Buffer Averaging, Parcel 302104-9007, Federal Way Dear Ms, Shablevslciy CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor City departments divisions have the Following comments in response to your May 16, 20195 subcnitud. The city deemed the application complete on June 10, 2019. Comments in this letter need to be addressed prior to issuance 0f a lazed usr.• application decision, or as otherwise noted. Questions regarding technical review comments should be addressed to the referenced staff representative, The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) can be accessed online at: ► . rnv.caci • trhlixl ' m 1kr . e Cinder department policy a reascanable sized single- family residence shall be 1,500 to 1,600 square feet, including the garage, which is proposed. All site improvements shall be Iocated as far as far as feasibly possible from the wetland and wetland buffer, minisxtzring impacts to the wetland function and value to the greatest extent. Community Development — Planning Division Leila Willoughby -Oakes, 253-835-2644, kJ[. v'1 a igllbY-��ke?,tyi�alw. ►/lf. Revise plans and ritical are report per the enclosed Landau me m (July 2019). �e r7 �r are. O v j r r ' uu di v� �0 [a l�c[a v ►n� Site 1�lrrjr The prajeci ►voul not comp y wtth � and bu erimg averaging requir eats in FWRC 19.145.440(5)(c). The wetland ]Suffer at its narrowest point may not be reduced to less than 75 percent of the required buffer width (i.e. 78.75 feet). The required buffer width for this wetland is 105-feet You have the following options. - Move the house closer to the eastern proper line to minimum side ar�of five feet. Vl L�3�.1 iM-ov IDS r �{�-F -f D �Ir�� r`�� Flip she home focatprint, with the garage located farthest away tom S 3541" Street. A' tional right-of-way improvements will be re ui.redep'er Public Works r uiremenrs- V�-o U S GC I U.i 1 by�L[ . +0 rv,.� (2r� FIYIRC 19.4�.015 a�ows for administrative variances, .you may considered reducing the front yard setback by a maximum of 25 percent (from 20 to 15 feet) and combine the review with the current Process III application. The proposal crust meet FWRC 19A5,030.1 criteria: That the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located. That the variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property to provide it with use rights and �)uj�C (-CqL) i f-e,�VLC v1-43t v t)e Mi s. Tanya Shablevski}, Page 2 of 4 ] my 31, 2019 privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvemelits in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located. J That the special circumstances of the subject property are not the result of the actions of the owner of the subject property. If you choose to apply for a variance:, the application will be re -noticed and additional review fees will be requited. Contact the PernUt Center at 253-835-2607, or pCri �i .centerei F e y�T�ns fox the FeeS. 10/ Reduce the house footprint. In that you propose a home footprint including the garage that does not exceed 1,fi U-1,500 syu�are feet, you inay consider a cunibinadon of options a), b), and r above. -3. The applicant shall ensure that the 20 foot se ack applies to the Wai�ge, unless =lie garage and driveway are orientated in such a way as to provide a minimum 20-foot length of parking area in front the garage within the property boundaries. Crritiial _Areas— Please address the following comments: id. The proposal includes a new proposed home footprint. Provide the total wetland buffer impact square footage on the plans and the total replanted/mitigation area proposed. The total shall include the home, driveway, associated utilities, and right-of-way, including stormwater infrastructure, on the site plans. The critical areas report depicts this on Attachment 1b of the March 6, 2019, Beaver Creek Environmental Services report; however, a full-sized site plan will be required for the Process III decisiot and fu e cousin C o pla s.�r��er �� s �� In this letter, stafFmembers have identt ed tt s that require the provision of additional information for review. You are permitted to average the wetland buffer to a maximum of 75 percent at the L narrowest point of the required buffer width. U t (� lM @-1�i5 ✓`7 The 165-foot buffer shall be correctly surveyed to scale on the site plan, as this proposal requests a wetland buffer intrusion exception. The buffer appears to be hand drawn. Include critical area signage specifications on the plans for a final director's approval. You will be required to install two signs prior to construction, install a physical barrier between the critical areas and areas of disturbance throughout construction. The applicant is -- responsible for making their own signage to be approved by the Community Developracni Dc iartrnent (find specifications enclosed , �GIA & + 0N P Delineate all etands on the subject property and associates wetland buffer. Show the remaining portion of contiguous wetland area, rating, and buffer widths to the south. In the 2016 ESA, the city's consultant determined that i the site contains a single Category I wetland with a 105-foot buffer. Please note and revi critic areas re on. u DV1 QIGI h we S u Depict the extent of the off -site wetland buffers on the plans to scale ro pursuant to INVRC 19.145.410(2). Depict a five-foot building setback line from the edge of all critical area buffers on the plans, now 1,1). 79263 19• I1)2396.0 I -UP \ds. 'Tanya Shablevsluy Page 3 of 4 Jul}' 31, 2019 When buffer averaging is employed a, part of a development proposal permanent critical area fencing shall be installed along the buffer edee (wooden split rail fencing for wildlife access). Please show this I on the construction plans. 6how n on 1,,� Pot 0S MFiga#on Planling Plan Rffquired— Ilic applicant is to submit a buffer enhaneemeni/planting plan:, inciuding planting specifications, required spacing, and proposed wetland species with monitoring notes for construction. Individual plants do not need be shown, just areas on preferably a 24 X 36 site plan. Please see the I..andau revicw memo. An area of degraded wetland in the cent+er of ehr. praperty may be enhOVA anc d with mi etion.t ; Y�- r4- �F (�12t i Formance .anti rriainterianee bond will be required for the wetland buffer enhancement. A fiv&yearWk o"r Public Works Development —Services Division Kevin Peterson, 253-835-2734, vin.j eterso cit ofifeciera.lw y&m Public Works Development Services has reviewed the materials submitted for the above -referenced project. Additional comments will follow under separate cover. Please contact the listed reviewer on timing. 4rBased on the submitted materials for one single-family home, the estimated total traffic impact fee is $3,999.00 (2019 rate). The actual fee will be assessed and collected from the applicant when the building permit is issued, usi g the fee schedule then in effect (FWRC 19.100.070[3][c]). Per.right-of-way modification file 19-100218-SM, the project must construct street improvements consistent with the planned roadway cross -sections as shown in Map III-4 in Chapter III of the Federal 6Yay Comprehensive Plan (1VCP) and Capital improvement Program (CIP). The applicant will be expected to construct improvements on the following street to the city's planned roadway cross -sections; y/ The applicant will be required to construct `half -street' improvements along your property frontage on SW 35411' Street. The half -street improvements shall be a 20-foot paved roadway, curb and gutter, 4-foot planter strip with street trees, and a 5-foot concrete sidewalk. The Improvements will be required to extend from the end of the cul-de-sac across the portion of Your property '"nth a distance sufficient enough to allow for installation of a city standard — driveway approach, plus an additional five feet to the west of the approach (currently proposed or revised) in order to transition back to the sidewalk, plater, curb, and gutter section. Development Services a are of the footprilit relocabot, to sa sfy critical area requirements. In b d� E'''rr>��r 3. The applicant apped fora l-way rno%fica X e city i, e a respona on ebniarp 19, 2019. The Public Works Deparmient denied the request. Please contact Public Works if the garage/driveway location is changed. Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Brian Asbury, 253-946-5407, asbu l et v :z r The applicant has completed and submitted to Lakehaven an application for a Water and Sewer Certificates of Availability on February 26, 2019. If the right-oE-way improvement of unopened South 35411, Street along the north side of the subject parcel occurs, die applicant shall extend the sewer system facilities by a Developer Extension Agreement to a point of i "LAI absetved that the upLind area between wetland flags A-4/A-5 and the eastern property line could provide a potential buffer enhancement location. This area is degraded by invasive weeds and Himalayan black berry etc. and placeinent of yard debris from the abutting; subdivision." i. -, i,o, 79263 1 Y-1 Q346 00-U P . lvls. Tanya Shablevskiv Page 4 of 4 July 31, 2019 the site's northwest comer. Alternatively, the applicant must secure a temporary sewer service connection by special service agrecment the north side of xhe subjcct property. wfw� yr e a,in easemfroM tp - n, Fo� -r rn. r r� //-t� South King Fire & Rescue Chris Cahan, 253-946-7243, chris.cahan bsouthUngfte,s r 4/ W aler Supply Fire Flom — The required fire flow for this project is 1000 gallons per minute for residence not exceeding 3600 square feet including garage and covered areas. A E:ardfrcrile of WalerAwlilabil * including a hydraulic fireflow model* shall be requested from the water district and provided at the time of the huilditig permit application. *A hydraulic fire %low model is required for single -Family residences that exceed 3600 square feet, including garages and covered areas. 0/ Fire Hydmnls — The existing fire hydrant meets hydrant location requirements. 7s'lt orr�y./Ic'ci'a:+' - Firc apparatus access roads shall comply with all requirements of Fire Access Policy 10,006: io .a a• z 7 e �', h + Fire Sprinkler System — Requirements for residential fire spriinklers, if any, are determined at the time of the building permit submittal. CLOSING Please be aware that this review does not preclude the city from requesting additional itnformation related to any of the topics discussed abov'c. Please submit revised application materials as appropriate, accompanied by the completed "Resubrnittal Information Form? {enclosed}. Pursuant to 17MC 19.15,050. if an applicant fails to provide additional inlarmation to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is reques.tad, the application shall be deemed null and void and the city shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect co such all application. If you have questions regarding this letter, contact me at 1 i4a.« a t f - a. ,ti 1 -' d . INV '. 01111 or 253-835-2644, Sincerely, \ Leila 'Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner enc: Critical Area Sign Template Rcsubmittal Form FWRC 19.45 "Variances" Site Plan Redlines c: Kevin Peterson, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Chris Cnhan, South King Fire & Roscuc Brian Ashury, J.akehovcn Water & Sewer Stec [4priterman, Landau, sq; 61 flarma oalaikqa Mark 1•Ieckert, Beaver Creek 13nvironmental, MhLv:kcrtfi_ __ �t1.u-m Duna Coastruction, r y a r r t Dk . I.D. 7u26a 19-102394,d10- UP Technical Memorandum TO: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Associate Planner, City of Federal Way FROM: Eve Henrichsen, PWS, and Steven Quarterman RESU'C'74 117ED DATE: December 23, 2019 FEB 18 2020 RE: Third -Party Review Shablevskiy Residence —Critical Areas Assessment (Revisio,, guNi FEDERAL WAY {�+AM'i'Y DEVELOPMENTS 922 SW 356th Street King County Parcel Nos. 3021049079 and 3021049007 Federal Way, Washington LAI Project No. 0238087.010 Introduction At the request of the City of Federal Way (City), Landau Associates, Inc. (LAI) is providing peer review comments on the following documents: October 22, 2019 revised Wetland and Stream Evaluation and Delineation Report and Buffer Averaging Plan, Shablevskiy Project Site (October 2019 Critical Areas Report; Beaver Creek 2019) Revised Site Plans, Shabelevskiy Residence Custom Design, which includes sheets prepared by Urbala, LLC and Antsey Engineering (October/November 2019 Site Plans; Urbala and Anstey 2019). The purpose of this peer review was to provide written responses to the corrections completed in the aforementioned documents in response to LAI's technical comments dated July 19, 2019. This peer review also provides a professional opinion regarding applicable regulatory requirements in the City of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19.145 (Environmentally Critical Areas), specifically under Article IV "Wetlands," 19.140.140 "Mitigation Plan Requirements," and 19.145.440 "Development Within Wetland Buffers."' Peer review comments specific to the October 2019 Revised Critical Areas Report are presented below. Comments are repeated from LAI's July 19, 2019 technical comments (LAI 2019), as necessary, if they were not addressed in the October 2019 Revised Critical Areas Report. 1) The October 2019 Revised Critical Areas Report does not satisfy all of the evaluation criteria provided in FWRC 19.145.080(2), specifically in relation to the following item: (e) Photographs of the site and critical areas (Repeat comment) Photographs of the wetlands described in the report are not provided. LAI acknowledges that photographs of the site, specifically of the northern portion of the site, were provided in review materials and locations referenced in the March 2019 Site Plan. Photographs taken during the LAI site visit are attached, documenting 1 Peer review of the stream identified in the November 2018 Critical Areas report is not included in this evaluation. LALANDAU ASSOCIATES 130 2nd Avenue South •Edmonds, Washington 98020 - (425) 778-0907 Landau Associates Wetland A, Wetland B, and the watercourse on the south end of the site, which maybe used to fulfill this criterion with a71the roval of the City. r roc y e 2) The October 2019 Revised i ical A�as Rep rrt does not satisfy all evaluation criteria provided in FWRC 19.145.410(2), specifically in relation to the following item: (b) Documentation of fieldwork, including field data sheets, rating system forms, and L baseline hydrologic data. t- AAAve&--A par -- 0 ' VA -rkp L (Repeat comment) Data sheets for upland sample points SP-2U and SP-3U are not provided. LAI acknowledges that data sheets for the wetlands are provided in the report appendix and that a general description of adjacent uplands is provided in the report text. While it is standard practice to include data sheets for both wetland and upland sample points, the upland sample point data forms may not be required provided that a description of the required information is included in the report text. 3) The wetland rating system forms are inconsistent with associated Figures R1 and R2. LAI concurs with responses provided in the rating forms and the comments below do not change the wetland ratings or buffer wi trry� designs "on a) Figure R1 shows Wetlands A an as ent ely scrub/shrub, while the rating forms indicate that both emergent and scrub/shrub vegetation classes are present (rating form question H.1.1). b) Figure R2 shows Wetlands A and B as entirely seasonally ponded, while the rating forms indicate that both seasonally inundated and saturated only hydroperiods are present (rating form question 1-11.2). 4) LAI requests that the wetland category be updated to Category II on pages 7, 8, and 9 of the revised Critical Areas Report. The updated rating forms indicate a rating of Category II, while the text reports that both wetlands have beea rating of Category III. *- CAO�- VIE 5) LAI requests evaluation of the proposed buiter averaging plan to demonstrate that the proposed plan satisfies FWRC 19.145.440(5)(b): The buffer is increased adjacent to the higher functioning area of habitat or more sensitive portion of the wetland and decreased adjacent to the lower functioning or less sensitive portion. Evaluation of habitat functions provided in the buffer area impacted by the house constructio and buffer area proposed for increase is not provided in the report.��Gi,U ✓i 6) LAI requests clarification and, if necessary, inclusion )proposecl activities that will occur in the wetland buffer (refer to comments 8 and 9 below). Peer review comments regarding the October/November 2019 Site Plans are presented below: 7) LAI is providing concurrence with the wetland boundary shown on the plans. Several sheets of the site plans include flags with labels that appear to indicate wetland boundary flagging located north of Wetland A (i.e., A-17 to A-20 and A-23); LAI recommends that these be removed or identified accordingly. r-2UWAD v e Peer Review Shablevskiy Residence — Critical Areas Assessment 2 December 23, 2019 Landau Associates 8) LAI requests clarification on the 150-foot Splash Blocks shown on the site plans. It is not clear if these are existing or proposed features. If proposed features, please includ a discussion of the impacts ithin the wetland b�uffe in a critical are s report. -t opo� I So' `aoa Sh bIV-1 Yl 1 U Y1 � dill V-P.�.� . 9) LAI requests c a ification on a emits o c earing on the Temporary Erosion n Se imen Control {TESL) heet. It appears that the limits of clearing extend inside the 79.5-foot buffer line. Temporary buffer impacts shall be restored following construction, and such impacts should be addre d in the vised Criiti I Areas, gel y❑ d 10) LAI requests con irmation that the area of uffer increase is4C)similar shape and size as shown in the revised Critical Areas Report. �c S f�p 'f�'ft- ) b 11) The City requests that the split rail fence be extended around the area of buffer increase to the west of the proposed house. dE otUtc A, F v1 This technical memorandum has been prepared for use by the City in evaluating the adequacy of the October 22, 2019 Wetland and Stream Evaluation and Delineation Report and Buffer Averaging Plan, Shablevskiy Project Site, and the Revised Site Plans. The purpose of the review was to assess the adequacy of the submitted documents for compliance with City requirements as promulgated in FWRC Title 19, and conformance with conventionally accepted wetland/waterway delineation practices. No other party is entitled to rely on the information, conclusions, and recommendations included in this document without the express written consent of LAI. Further, the reuse of information, conclusions, and recommendations provided herein for extensions of the project or for any other project, without review and authorization by LAI, shall be at the user's sole risk. LAI warrants that within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, these services have been provided in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions as this project. LAI makes no other warranty, either express or implied. LAI appreciates this opportunity to be of service to the City. Please contact us if you have any questions or if we may be of further service. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. Eve Henrichsen, PWS Project Scientist Steven Quarterman Senior Associate ERH/JAF/ccy P:\238\087.010\R\Revised Docs November 2019\LAI Response\LAI Shablevskiy Residence Critical Areas Peer Review_tm-12-23.19.docx Peer Review Shablevskiy Residence — Critical Areas Assessment 3 December 23, 2019 Landau Associates References Beaver Creek. 2019. Revised: Wetland and Stream Evaluation and Delineation Report and Buffer Averaging Plan, Shablevskiy Project Site, Federal Way, Washington. Beaver Creek Environmental Services, Inc. October 22. LAI. 2019. Technical Memorandum: Peer Review, Shablevskiy Residence - Critical Areas Assessment, 922 SW 356th Street, King County Parcel Nos. 3021049079 and 3021049007, Federal Way, Washington. Landau Associates, Inc. July 19. Urbala and Anstey. 2019. Engineering Drawings: Site Plan, Shablevskiy Residence Custom Design. Urbala, LLC and Anstey Engineering. Revised November 5. Attachment Figure 1: Selected Photographs Peer Review Shablevskiy Residence — Critical Areas Assessment 4 December 23, 2019 ATTACHMENT 1 Selected Photographs Ut� fly CITY OF Federal Way -:- on Opportune Ms. Tanyana Shablevskiy 2940 57th Avenue NE Tacoma, WA 98422 taniashablevs.k. , p].gmp cam CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Re: File #19-102396-00-UP; 3PDPARTY WETLAND REVIEW Shablevsky, 905 SW 3541h Street (Parcel's 302104 9007 &-9079), Federal Way Dear Ms. Shablevskiy: Jim Ferrell, Mayor December 24, 2019 On November 6, 2019, the City of Federal Way received a revised Wetland & Stream Evaluation & Delineation Report (REV-1) for the Shablevskiy Project Site, prepared by Beaver Creek Environmental Inc. (revised October 22, 2019). WETLAND REPORT The city forwarded the report to our wetland consultant, Landau, for their review. Landau completed a site visit, reviewed relevant documents, and prepared a memorandum Quly 19, 2019) with technical comments. The city concurs with Landau's review. NEXT STEPS Please review the peer review comments in the enclosed memorandum prepared by Landau, in which several comments were not addressed. A revised wetland and stream delineation report, photographs, and data sheets for upland sample points SP-2U and SP-3U, among other corrections, must be submitted. Please indicate in the report with an underline, the items updated per Landau's December 23, 2019, second review memo. Should you have any questions about this letter, I can be reached at (253) 835-2644, or 161a.wi!Qughby- oakqs@CityoffederalwAy.com. Sincerel , Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner enc: December 23, 2019, Memorandum from Landau July 19, 2019, Memorandum from Landau Resubmittal Form c: Mark Heckert, Beaver Creek Environmental Services, Inc., PO Box 71695, Puyallup, WA 98373, kh r e�mm 19-102396-00-UP Doc. I.D. 73972 CITY OF Federal Way i.e► terect on Opportunity CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor July 31, 2019 Ms. Tanya Shablevskiy 2940 57th Avenue NE Tacoma, WA 98422 Laxuashablev'v@gmad.com FILE Re: File #19-102396-UP; PROCESS III TECHNICAL REVIEW Shablevs1dy Wetland Puffer Averaging, Parcel 302104-9007, Federal Way Dear Ms. Shablevskiy City departments/divisions have the following comments in response to your May 16, 2019, submittal. The city deemed the application complete on June 10, 2019. Comments in this letter need to be addressed prior to issuance of a land use application decision, or as otherwise noted. Questions regarding technical review comments) should be addressed to the referenced staff representative. The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) can be accessed online at: h w%vw.code uhlis.hin .com WA Federa!L0 Under department policy a reasonable sized single-family residence shall be 1,500 to 1,600 square feet, including the garage, which is proposed. All site improvements shall be located as far as far as feasibly possible from the wetland and wetland buffer, rruniimizing impacts to the wetland function and value to the greatest extent. Community Development — Planning Division Leila Willoughby -Oakes; 253-935-2644; Ieila.vviil n hb-o-arlces .citvoffederahV'a .eem - - — Revise plans and critical area report per the enclosed Landau memo Quly 2019). 2. Site Plan — The project would not comply with wetland buffering averaging requirements in FWRC 19.145.440(5)(c). The wetland buffer at its narrowest point may not be reduced to less than 75 percent of the required buffer width (i.e. 78.75 feet). The required buffer width for this wetland is 105-feet. You have the following options: a. Move the house closer to the eastern property line to minimum side yard of five feet. b. Flip the home footprint, u.7ith the garage located farthest away from SW 354th Street. Additional right-of-way improvements will be required per Public `Yorks requirements. c. FWRC 19.45.015 allows for administrative variances, you may considered reducing the front yard setback by a maximum of 25 percent (from 20 to 15 feet) and combine the review with the current Process III application. The proposal must meet FWRC 19.45.030.1 criteria: i. That the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located. ii. That the variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of- ate subject property to provide it with use rights and 19-1023 96-00-UP Doc. I.U. 79263 Ms. Tanya Shablevskiy Page 2of4 July 31, 2019 4. privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located. iii. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located. iv. That the special circumstances of the subject property are not the result of the actions of the owner of the subject property. If you choose to apply for a variance, the application will be re -noticed and additional review fees will be required. Contact the Permit Center at 253-835-2607, or �eririit.center ci offed wa .cam for the fees. d. Reduce the house footprint. In that you propose a home footprint including the garage that does not exceed 1,600-1,500 square feet, you may consider a combination of options a), b), and c) above. The applicant shall ensure that the 20 foot setback applies to the garage, unless the garage and driveway are orientated in such a way as to provide a minimum 20-foot length of parking area in front the garage within the property boundaries. CriticalAreas—Please address the following comments: a. The proposal includes a new proposed home footprint. Provide the total wetland buffer impact square footage on the plans and the total replanted/mitigation area proposed. The total shall include the home, driveway, associated utilities, and right-of-way, including stormwater infrastructure, on the site plans. The critical areas report depicts this on Attachment lb of the March 6, 2019, Beaver Creek Environmental Services report; however, a full-sized site plan will be required for the Process III decision and future construction plans. b. In this letter, staff members have identified items that require the provision of additional in for review. You are permitted to average the wedand buffer to a maximum of 75 percent at the narrowest point of the required buffer width. c. The 10-Foot buffer shall be correctly surveyed to scale on the site plan, as this pxopasal requests a wetland buffer intrusion exception. The buffer appears to be hand drawn. will d. Include critical area signage specifications on the plans for afinald reecctoer' approval. e nal. You areas required to install two signs prior to construction, install < physical and areas of disturbance throughout construction. The applicant is responsible for making their awn signage to be approved by the Community Development Department (fired specifications enclosed). e. Delineate all wetlands on' the subject property and associates wetland buffer. Show the remaining portion of contiguous wetland area, rating, and buffer Nvidths to the south. In the 2016 ESA, the city's consultant determined that the site contains a single Category I wetland with a 105-foot buffer. Please note and revise critical areas report. f. Depict the extent of the off -site wetland buffers on the plans to scale rsuant to FWRC 19.145.410(2). pu g. Depict afive-foot building setback line from the edge of all critical area buffers on the plans. 19-102396-00-UP Doc. I.D. 79263 Ms. Tanya Shablevskiy Page 3 of 4 July 31, 2019 h. When buffer averaging is employed as part of a development proposal permanent critical area fencing shall be installed along the buffer edge (wooden split rail fencing for wildlife access). Please show this on the construction plans. i. MiCigaiaon Planting Plana Required — The applicant is to submit a buffer enhancement/planting plan, including planting specifications, required spacing, and proposed wetland species with monitoring notes for construction. Individual plants do not neeAe shown, lust areas on preferably a 24 X 36 site plan. Please see the Landau .review memo. An area of degraded wetland in the center of the property may be enhanced with mitigation.' j. A five-year performance and maintenance bond will be required for the wetland buffer enhancement. Public Works Development —Services Division Kevin Peterson, 253-835-2734, !vin. eter on ei offederalwa .com Public Works Development Services has reviewed the materials submitted for the above -referenced project. Additional comments will follow under separate cover. Please contact the listed reviewer on timing. 1. Based on the submitted materials for one single-family home, the estimated total traffic impact fee is $3,999.00 (2019 rate). The actual fee will be assessed and collected from the applicant when the building permit is issued, using the fee schedule then in effect (FWRC 19.100.070[3][c]). 2. Per right-of-way modification File 19-100218-SM, the project must construct street improvements consistent with the planned roadway cross -sections as shown in Map III-4 in Chapter III of the Federal Way COMPrehensive Plan (FWCP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The applicant will be expected to construct improvements on the following street to the city's planned roadway cross -sections: a. The applicant will be required to construct `half -street' improvements along your property frontage on SW 3541h Street. The half -street improvements shall be a 20-foot paved roadway, curb and gutter, 4-foot planter strip with street trees, and a 5-foot concrete sidewalk. The improvements will be required to extend from the end of the cul-de-sac across the portion of — -your property with a distance-sufftciem,enough-to-aUcw-For-installa-tion,ok-city-standard- driveway approach, plus an additional five feet to the west of the approach (currently proposed or revised) in order to transition back to the sidewalk, plater, curb, and gutter section. Development Services is aware of the footprint relocation to satisfy critical area requirements. 3. The applicant applied for a right-of-way modification. The city issued a response on February 19, 2019. The Public Works Department denied the request. Please contact Public Works if the garage/driveway location is changed. Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Brian Asbury, 253-946-5407, basL).xrVjg1akehaven.or 1. The applicant has completed and submitted to Lakehaven an application for a Water and Sewer Certificates of Availability on February 26, 2019. 2. If the right-of-way improvement of unopened South 354,h Street along the north side of the subject parcel occurs, the applicant shall extend the sewer system facilities by a Developer Extension Agreement to a point of "LAI observed that the upland area between wetland flags A-4/A-5 and the eastern property line could provide a potential buffer enhancement location. This area is degraded by invasive weeds and IIimalayan black.". etc. and placement of yard debris from the abutting subdivision." 19-102396-00-UP Doc- I.D. 79263 Ms. Tanya Shablevskiy Page 4 of 4 July 31, 2019 die site's northwest corner. Alternatively, the applicant must secure a temporary sewer service connection by special service ageement tthe north side of the subject property. I South King Fire & Rescue Chris Cahan, 253-946-7243, Chris. ahan southkin•or 1. rater Supply Fire Flow —The required fire flow for this project is 1000 gallons per minute for residence not exceeding 3600 square feet including garage and covered areas. A Ceroctete of WaterAvailability including a hydraulic fire flow model* shall be requested from the water district and provided at the time of the building permit application. *A hydraulic fire flow model is required for single-family residences that exceed 3600 square feet, including garages and covered areas. 2. Fire Hydrants —The existing fire hydrant meets hydrant location requirements. 3. Emergency Access — Fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all requirements of Fire Access Policy 10.006: h u akin fire.a Doc rtentCentgr Home tew 24. 4. Fire Sprixkler System — Requirements for residential fire sprinklers, if any, are determined at the time of the building permit submittal. CLOSING Please be aware that this review does not preclude �misret1.1e city from evt'sed application umaterialsas appropriate, 'Accompanied by any of the topics discussed above. Pleas the completed "Resubrimittal Information Foerm" (enclosed). o hin$� daysuof beingant to notified u'ft d thaOsuch information tis fails to provide additional informationtY re .nested, rhea application shall he deem null and void and the_city shall have no duty to process, review, ox q pP issue any decisions with respect to such an application. + If you have questions regarding this letter, contact me at 1 a.willou hb - akes city ffederalwaG.coin, or 253-835-2644. Sincerely, ow,;" \� -� *,-i Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner Resubmittal Form enc: Critical Area Sign Template Site Plan Redlines FWRC 19.45 "Variances" Chris Cahan, South Icing Dire & lZescue c: Kevin Peterson, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Sieve Quarterman, Iandau, ' s. er a .mil n it C. Brian Asbury,1.akehaven Water & Sewer Dima Construction, ryes r t r'va ° ,yFark Fleekert, Beaver Creek Environmental, is kc r - Doc LD- 79263 19-102396-00-UP ad GAND�.t��—mod/� jaz CLEAR.NG LIMITG. L 4 T FENCE � �d L I 150=FT aftASS-[ 9LOCKS_ _ r _ ��CFLAGNUM ,k-At9 U M o E \1 Di FLAGNUM SPIRA _W 23 1 1\� FLAGNUI:A I I \ // ?,3z- I AGN F`AGI�JM �� [ram � ��.i FLAGNUM l:F— fi A� DP-2 '1\D REV, II/13/10 -"-' NATIVE GROUVTH PROTECTION owc No. PUBLIC ^^ SITE ADDRESS: 8XX SW 354TH ST FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 PROJECT DATA: 1' ZONE: RS7.2 PARCEL #3021049007 I In . E 165 F7 DF K' i/2 OF SE 1/4 OF Fir_JL4 OF NW 1/4 LESS T 135 FT OF S 235 FT LESS CO RG LOT , 7fi,6fi6l (, `'BUI7iNG-COVER POR COY[RPGF• = Sf OkVLWAvI 51.5-SF TOTAL COVERAGE: 2351-SF (3-72%) T 4- I- CALCLJLA 'I N '?Vi 9 I - ;7 SF RESIOENTIAL ZONES (25 TREE LINFTS/bACE) 75,665/4350C = 1.76 {25 TREE} s 44 TREE UNITS RM'S (� .� • L�.• LEi=;CiJL) EXCAVATING PLAN: CLEARING LIMIT AREA: 3324-SF EXCAVATfNG AREA: 290-CUBIC FEET A 4, dfae r k p/r-CnP TREE SHAL_ BE REMOVE N C _ T �H IntacL�l� C-i--}' area s5��e. �n�th w xec c co;ba"S If- mac., SMULiIa� I 1 C r l4 �-7 -M�C —eCaaOCR ma- O r SHABLEVSKIY RESIDENCE CUSTOM DESIGN DESIGNS " ENGINEERS ' BUILDS 3350513thaaftyrS,.SWkA 8XX SW 354TH ST pc 2147i 87�i 303 web:,r.11i�n,11a. 10toeir.c„ Ph,a534L35-1516 FEDERAL WAY. WA 98023 7E- ,ALE 1" = 10 41{P + ` I clfaKR _ •Jv rYnunS.�a �fpr`•.a "' tukL DATE: 03/18/19 CHECKED: BT SHEET # 'P.O,IECT - 118-C MAY 13 7_�49 r") w F- U) LEGEN D �JJUµG 1y.i�.{,REA: 3324-5' EtC -PM 4A'Ct' 250-CL'6I1 FEET TR=E SHALL BE REMOVE LT l cl�\ Z91.&1�\ i C L • � Oa ,yI �a i 1D cp Ili. •- � is 3 ae -dr A-18 LEGEND ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE UNDERGROUND SEWER MAIN O SANITARY S_WE4 CL=ANCUT OQ STORV DRAIN MANHOLE ® STORV DRAIN ��ATCH BASIN UND'=RGROU\D STORM MAIN 0 STORM DRAIN YARD DRAIN - < LX. CULVLHI FIRE HYDRANT ® 'EATER METER pQ WATER VALVE WATER MAIN PA.INTMARKS C SAS METER SAS VALVE AS MAIN-PAINTMA.P.KS ® DOWEP. METER QT CAB_E T`✓ RISER E— J III FY PO-E ANCHOR 4 JTILITY PO_[ LTILITY POLE AND TRANSFORM=R =OWER POI-_ WITH D-ROP61IGHT -- ..Nf)FR(,ROUND POWER PANTMAiKS ;;VLRHE.ALI POWER —D T— OVERHEAD TELEPHONE/CADLC -IT EXISTING SIGN ❑ TELEPHONE R.SER ----------- ---� _�-.- �y 1 -•�Tt 5p�A•-,- >" � �r,LCN.1M [y q.rcrv� C',--(IIC4C rfj1t..+r£�Gn'G I I T)ATF REVISION REV EY: 4/25/2019 REVISION KHAI RENSED TO ADD WMAND •PFLp, M'3 MAIL BOY, o GA-E POLE O (,HAIN LINK FENCE (CLF) ❑ 'WOOD FENCE (WDF) 'AIRE FENCE (INT; PAVEMENT GRAVEI CONCRETE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DECIDUOUS TREE SHRUBS FIR TP.FE CEDAR TREE O NAPLE TREE W,IAC $k;oo4 p"lA?FA-YCD yA a—e,A51 b 4- loppFYt �cLFr �.,INTrt Alf . ,Fx•.I 5pa.. B� B L�n� 0 0 — — I3 S�� 8XX SW 354TH ST FLDERAL WAY, WA 98023 FROJEC. DATA: ZONE- RS7.2 PARCEL 13021OAR?77 E 165 LTi a, W IIL/2 OF SL 1/4 C4' NC l/4 yl IIw 1JA Ub-4 i IJS 11 Uf 35 2r LEss co RD LOT COyEP.AGE LOT AREA: 7aE66-5F_1A,953,-(&1,!I.5 ./ L Wl�4.f11 Jf All• RUILOINy COVEIF PORCH COVERAGE' = 2:36-SF DRIVEWAY: 513-SF TOTt COVERAGE 2651-SF (472x) TBEf UWT:4CotAJW A4..112A1 * sf R[$IUENTIIL 'AWES #5 ma Umv-=) 74UL{/uSoD • =•N o3 MW • ,A IBM UNITS REO'S E ' C(xl Q� �vLY�%� /\ {per- %%� (L 4Y-:c. ,,F•�ylM1'`�-f 1i4 �:`•' MD ll- ERMA,�� DESIGNS • ENGINEERS' BUILDS 3350513W PlareS, SuileR 1 �� W,1,�i TLv"Web; ;vww: L ,Fh 253436-1516 �H�BLEVSKIY RESIDENCE CUSTOM DESIGN g SW 354TH ST FEDERAL WAY. WA 98023 PAn ENT OF USE& FEE 15 DUE TC L'RBALA DEVELOPM134. LLC PF3CR TO CONSTR1CIOd FOR E�,EAF7ESRE�NLTP�,Ta_5 DA'ILE ,T�E/!-4, PLANS dRE coPl'w� r.-t m AccoRDAv� w� � u OF ALI-O PORTIC.RB'11,SSE IW BY ,C\Y .`£T.10." Cf All. OR PORTKNS O= 71.ESE ALMS OR VARU:IION51{�OF LIITHLLT URTTEN FERI55ION FRO.I URBALA DEVELOP`EVT 15 STRICTL" PWWBLIED, TME5E DRAUNES ABC F_AN5 SET FCR I, ON T45 5:ZT AS INSTRLI'PpTS OF',.ERVIE.E ARE AND SMALL RE MANTOTFE PRD��T 0=URBALA OEVELO?"ENT LLC DY DF O . A e �' .. , rt R •- ,AL�" i11FDN:R ST Ll L l • pp,p 2 FFO.ECT 11 1 8-C OA v Vv gE 1VED 16 2013 CRV OF FEDERAL WAV r� CITY OF Federal Allay Centered on Opportunity July 26, 2019 Ms. Tanyana Shablevskiy 2940 57th Avenue NE Tacoma, WA 98422 taniashabl vski a1coin CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Re: File #19-102396-UP; 3— PARTY WETLAND REVIEW (BUFFER AVERAGING REQUEST) Shablevskiy, Parcel No. 302104-9007, Federal Way Dear Ms. Shablevskiy: On May 16, 2019, the City of Federal Way received a Master Land Use (MLU) Process III application in order to constrict a single -Family residence an a parcel completely encumbered by a wetland and wetland buffer. The applicant submitted Wetland and Stream Eualuadan Report and BuferAveraging Plan—Shablevskiy Prajert Site, prepared by Beaver Creek Envi.roamental (November 2018). WETLAND REPORT The city forwarded the report to our wetland consultant, Landau, for their review. Landau completed a site visit, reviewed relevant documents, and prepared a memorandum Quly 19, 2019) with technical comments. The city concurs with Landau's review. NEXT STEPS Please review the peer review comments in the enclosed memorandum prepared by Landau. A revised wetland and stream delineation report must be submitted pursuant to the listed corrections. This must occur in order to move Forward on the proposed wetland buffer averaging request. The revised report will be peer reviewed at the applicant's expense in accordance with Federal Wlay Revised Code (FWRC) 19.145.080(3) with the remaining funds. You will be required to install the enclosed critical area signage and split rail fencing along the buffer edge. Should you have any questions about this letter, I can be reached at Leila.�vsllou hbv-oa�, kes%%citvoffederal,%v v.com, or 253-835-2644. Sincerely, 4 j Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner enc: July 18, 2019; Memorandum from Landau c: Steve Quarterman, Landau Associates, �quartermasita landauinc.com Resubmittal Form Mark Heckert, Beaver Creek Environmental, mheckertQQ.com Doc LD. 79394 19-102396-00-UP Technical Memorandum TO: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Associate Planner, City of Federal Way FROM: Eve Henrichsen, PWS, and Steven Quarterman DATE: July 19, 2019 RE: Peer Review Shablevskiy Residence —Critical Areas Assessment 922 SW 356th Street King County Parcel Nos. 3021049079 and 3021049007 Federal Way, Washington LAI Project No. 0238087.010 Introduction At the request of the City of Federal Way (City), Landau Associates, Inc. (LAI) is providing peer review comments on the November 27, 2018 Wetland and Stream Evaluation and Delineation Report and Buffer Averaging Plan, Shablevskiy Project Site (November 2018 Critical Areas Report; Beaver Creek 2018) prepared by Beaver Creek Environmental Services, Inc. To support peer review of the November 2018 Critical Areas Report, the City also provided LAI with: March 18, 2019 Site Plan, Shabeleskiy Residence Custom Design, prepared by Urbala, LLC, (March 2019 Site Plan; Urbala 2019) June 13, 2016 Critical Area Report of the Kenny Properties, 922 SW 3561h Street, Federal Way (June 2016 Critical Areas Report; Wetlands Northwest LLC 2016). The purpose of this peer review is to provide a professional opinion regarding applicable regulatory requirements in the City of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRQ Title 19.145 (Environmentally Critical Areas), specifically under Article IV "Wetlands," 19.140.140 "Mitigation Plan Requirements," and 19.145.440 "Development Within Wetland Buffers."' Peer review comments regarding the November 2018 Critical Areas Report are as follows: 1) LAI staff conducted a reconnaissance of the subject property (i.e., King County Parcel Nos. 3021049079 and 3021049007) on July 8, 2019. LAI was able to locate most of the pink wetland boundary flags on the subject property remaining from the January 22, 2019 delineation and concur with their placement. Within the flagged wetland areas, LAI observed dominance of hydrophytic vegetation; saturation, algal mats, sparsely vegetated concave surfaces, and drainage patterns satisfying the wetland hydrology parameter; and soil profiles satisfying the hydric soils parameters depleted below dark surface and loamy mucky mineral. LAI staff evaluated upland areas outside of the flagged wetland boundary and noted a distinct change in vegetation, lack of hydric soils, and lack of wetland hydrology indicators. 2) The November 2018 Critical Areas Report does not satisfy all of the evaluation criteria provided in FWRC 19.145.080(2), specifically items: 1 Peer review of the stream identified in the November 2018 Critical Areas report is not included in this evaluation. 17� LANDAU -�� ASSOCIATES 130 2nd Avenue South • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • (425) 778-0907 Landau Associates (c) The dates, names, and qualifications of the persons preparing the report and documentation of any reconnaissance on site; Qualifications of the persons preparing the report are not provided; however, LAI acknowledges that the Beaver Creek Environmental Services website provides summaries and hyperlinks to staff qualifications. The date of the onsite assessment is unclear as the cover page shows November 27, 2018 as the report date, but page 4 of the report states that the onsite assessment was completed on January 22, 2019. (e) Photographs of the site and critical areas; iii. Photographs of the wetlands described in the report are not provided. LAI acknowledges that photographs of the site, specifically of the northern portion of the site, were provided in review materials and locations referenced on the March 2019 Site Plan. (g) A description of efforts made to apply mitigation sequencing pursuant to FWRC 19.145.130 to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to critical areas; iv. Discussions of impact avoidance and minimization are not provided. 3) The November 2018 Critical Areas Report does not satisfy all of the evaluation criteria given in FWRC 19.145.410(2), specifically items: (b) Identification of all local, state, and/or federal wetland related permit(s) required for the proposal. i. LAI acknowledges that proposed impacts are limited to wetland buffers, and related permitting is restricted to the City critical areas requirements. (c) Documentation of fieldwork, including field data sheets, rating system forms, and baseline hydrologic data. ii. Data sheets for sample points SP-2U and SP-3U are not provided. iii. Required rating system forms are incomplete; refer to Comment 4 below. (d) Description of the methodologies used to conduct the wetland delineations, rating system forms, or impact analyses, including references. iv. LAI requests confirmation that the onsite assessment included procedures provided in the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (USACE 2010). LAI notes that data forms from the Regional Supplement were used to record data at sample plots SP-1W and SP-3W, but that the Regional Supplement is not referenced in the discussion of the onsite assessment procedures provided in the Executive Summary. (e) Identification and characterization of all wetlands and buffers on and within 225 feet of the subject property. For off -site areas with limited or no access, estimate conditions using best available information. Peer Review Shablevskiy Residence — Critical Areas Assessment 2 July 19, 2019 v. LAI observed Critical that Wetland landau Associates al Areas Re A extends off sit parcel An estimated 4) LAI note Shown' bOundar0 shows 0 Of offsite Rtext extending Figure, 2 and th s that the h ►te wetlands ding Into the e and SP-3W; Ydric soil indicator within 225 fee adiacent however, , F7 t should e tAl observed ,the recorded ' DePleted Dar d b Mineral so meeting bath soil profiles do k Surface, is within Wetlands A11, De not Meet marked 5 j L41 re nds A and B Depleted Bel t the de5eri On sheets Sp W quests clarific and concurs Below park Surface a ption for this Rttachme atiOn re that hYdric indicator. nt 1a shows fl regarding the soil is Present F1, Loamy Mucky requests clarificationag BO1 c Wetland b°uradar onnec - missing label on whether trng to an unlab Y between Wetland$ Areas Re �pomt on the bo 601 is Intended eled�missin Rand B. treat port identifies theseundary shown to connect tO g point near flag they should t� a _ as gle on Attachrr+ent 1a A01 or �'re is LAI ,+nary+ , .. a sin. wetland. 7 o $2, or if there is a In the area between flags B01 and A01, LAI observed Critir-,r ,� � l notes that the d hydric soils but no indicators of Critira+ hydrology were present, and the absence of hydrology indicators duringOur could be due to seasonal fluctuation. Vegetation observed b hydrophytic species x of includin reconnaissance g, but not limited to, Oregon ash and almonberryed a l(R bus sPectabilis), and upland species, including, but not limited to English ivy (Hedera helix), Indian Plum (Oemlerid cerasiformis), and western sword fern (palystichum munitu 6) LAI provides the following comments to the Wetland A and B ratingfor m) classification of the wetlands from Category 11) to Category II wetlands. The width will remain unchanged, as Category I wetlands with a forms, standard which change standard buffer of 105 feet, the same as Category III Wetlands. t score of 5 have abuffer ha a. The following maps and figures are required as referenced in the ratin f i. Cowardin plant classes. g orm: ii. Hydroperiods. Location of outlet. iv. Boundary of 150-foot buffer. V. 1-kilometer (km) Polygon; Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat. — vi. Screen capture of 303(d) listed waters in basin. vii. Screen capture of list of Total Maximum Daily Loads for Water Resource Inventory Area in which unit is found. b. Under Question H 2.0, provide calculations noted in H 2.1. c. For Question H 3.0, it appears occurs within 100 meteofthe site duentothe streamion (i.e., "snags and logs") should be provided a rating value of on/adjacent to the site, and "M" instead of L. Peer Review Shablevskiy Residence — Critical Areas Assessment 3 July 19, 2019 Landau Associates 7) 9) SC 1.0 through SC b.0 should Based on Special Characteristics, r Categorixati to show r evj5ed Wetland boundaries and d, 'llnde dated eye completed.to and 1b be up ents meet buffer averaging that Attachm does not the applicable i_Al requests eats 3.v and 5 and 1b d to satisfy ,per Comm ttachrnents n a revise Mitigation Plan buffers A current plan in A and Will need t° b 9 145• 0 ed following 14 , that the 145.440 L51 s listed in may be allow to less than 75 LAl notes FWRC �W RC, including item er averaging requirements of that buff Point is not reduced buffer width 440 L5) states est P quire a Standard 75 feet to roV�ded � RC 19.145• narrow Property req criteria p ents. FW that the buffer at its the prop Of at least 7g' feet, Requirerr The Wetland on buffer Width r be reduced to 60 criteria, including imum a buffe also lists buffer certain a required width o5e that the 145 q4'� Lb) must rnarntain a min RC 19. ..ztiand percent of th therefore eats d 1b PrOp With e footprint of the p feet, and 1a an u. ment. FW ccurS _��` of 105 Attachrn buffer When development o $ a reasonable use meet this criterion inimum of meet the m n op ior+.......,,, uu� � wiptt� of ? .75 ee .. nr as a required. If the reasonable use exception is Which does..y� „rh .nrPmP in buffer enhancement, and buffer exception pursuant to FWRC 19.145.0�0 will be req pursued, LAI suggests a combination of buffer averaging, , b ovements to function and values increase to minimize impacts associated with proposed pursuant to FWRC 19.145.09d(4). ro ert on affected critical areas, p s A-4/A_5 and the eastern ed b invasive i buffer enhancement location. This area is deg Y 9) LAI observed that the upland area between wetland flags area i arm degraenided by herb line could provide a potent weeds (bindweed [Convolvufus arvensis}, Himalayan blackberry and placement of [Geranium robertianurn), and poison hemlock [ egetated With a healthy native Robert [Gera property yard debris LFigure 1). Most of the subject t for buffer increase, community, which also provides opportunity for use by the City in evaluating the adequacy of the resented in the November 27, 2018 Wetland and Stream Evaluation This technical memorandum has been prepared of the review summary of baseline conditions p Plan, Shablevskiy Project Site. Thepurpose ort and Buffer Averaging Hance with City requirements as and Delineation Rep accepted wetland/waterway was to assess the adequacy of the submitted documents for comp accep rely on the information, conclusions, and the in FWRC Title 19, and conformance to conventionally promulgatedis entitled t Y delineation practices. No other party express written consent of LAI. Further, d recommendations provided herein for extensions of the recommendations included in this dncument without the exp eat the user's sole reuse of information, conclusions, a LAI, shall b ro ect or for any other project, without review and authorizatio and budget, our services have been p schedule, members of tent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by risk. LAI warrants that within the limitations o scope, conditions as this project. We provided in a manner consis in the same locality under similar co the profession currently practicing make no other warranty, either express or implied. July 19, 2019 Peer Review Critical Areas Assessment 4 Shablevskiy Residence — Landau Associates We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City. Please contact us if you have any questions or if we may be of further service. • LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. Eve Henrichsen, PWS Project Scientist Steven Quarterman Senior Associate ERH/SJQ/ccy P:\238\087.010\R\LAI Shablevskiy Residence Critical Areas Peer Review_tm - 07-19-19.docx References Beaver Creek. 2018. Wetland and Stream Evaluation and Delineation Report and Buffer Averaging Plan, Shablevskiy Project Site, Federal Way, Washington. Beaver Creek Environmental Services, Inc. November 27. Urbala, LLC. 2019. Engineering Drawing: Site Plan, Shablevskiy Residence Custom Design. March 18. USACE. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region. Publication No. ERDC/EL TR-10-3. Version 2.0. Research and Development Center Environmental Laboratory, US Army Corps of Engineer. May. htt /www.usace.arm .mil Portals 2 docs civilworks re ulator re su west mt finalsu ❑2. pdf• Wetlands Northwest LLC. 2016. Critical Area Report for the Kenny Properties, 922 SW 356th Street, Federal Way, Washington. June 13. Attachment Figure 1: Attachment 1a Markup Peer Review Shablevskiy Residence — Critical Areas Assessment 5 July 19, 2019 Figure 1. BUFFERS EXTEND PAST SITE BOUNDARIES 'IN ALL AREAS EXCEPT NORTH END f - 0ou bufferb�uadzry — -f f ` 2523 s.q reduce 60 FT. A31� A30 -0A.V 0, wetland A51 A2 r 3 r MADRN SALAL-- , :SP 2� 82 Y 61� ' 63 wellarld , - _ 84 810 SP3w r w ■B9 t ASH SAP POPLAR EIG rs Bo*_ .. _. •SolB7 DITCH ar,3 • Leila Willoughby -Oakes From: Kun II Lee <unileek@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 7:55 PM To: Ping Inquiry Cc: Leila Willoughby -Oakes Subject: Shablevskiy Residence -Wetland Buffer Averaging Hello, I recently received a notice that wetlands behind our home will be allowed to be built upon. A big reason in our decision to make this place our home for the last decade was the lovely greenbelt behind our deck and backyard. For many years we've been able to enjoy the quiet and peace that came with the location of the home. It makes my family very sad to hear that you will be tearing all this town to build new homes and we'd like to express our frustration and concern along with all my other neighbors that along the wetlands, and urge you to reconsider this decision. As you are well aware, this neighborhood remains one of the only highly sought after homes left in your city because of the location and surroundings. Furthermore, there are also ponds in the greenbelt behind our home that many animals and many kinds of birds frequently visit, building in that natural environment will ruin homes for many wild life in the area seriously. Again, please reconsider this development plan.. Best Regards, Kenny Lee My address is 831 SW 355th Court. Leila Willoughby -Oakes Subject: FW: Notice of Master land use application(File#19-102396-UP) Attachments: Shablevskiy TA.pdf, 051619 Shablevskiy Reasonable Use Narrative.pdf; Shablevskiy Reasonable Use Plan submitted 051619.0 From: Ping Inquiry Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 7:10 AM To: 'chaewoo pak'; Ping Inquiry Subject: RE: Notice of Master land use application(File#19-102396-UP) Greetings Mr. Pak, Thank you for your comment. At present no decision has been made on this application. However, please find the attached proposed wetland buffer averaging plans and master land use application. The footprint of the single family home will be limited to 1,500 to 1,600 sf- as the applicant has reasonable use of their property. Right of way improvements 5-feet past the applicant's driveway will occur. Technical revisions are expected on the application- including a reduction of a front -yard setback and a 5-ft side yard setback to avoid wetland buffer impacts to the greatest possible extent. Let me know if you have any further questions, Leila L. Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner Federal Way . i:. ... urumry From: chaewoo pak mailto:cw. ak hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2019 2:13 PM To: Ping Inquiry Subject: Notice of Master land use application(File#19-102396-UP) Hi, My name is Chaewoo Pak, a resident of 839 s.w 355th ct. Federal way. As this project is on the wetland buffer zone just behind my back yard, I am very concerned how this project is going to impact the wetland. Please send me a copy of the original decision. Regards, Chaewoo Pak -UP Leila Willoughby -Oakes Subject: FW: project location parcel 302104-9007 From: Ping Inquiry Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 7:46 AM To: 'Michelle Larson -Gridley' Subject: RE: project location parcel 302104-9007 Hi Michelle, Thank you for the public comment on the requested Use Process III wetland buffer averaging for the property. As proposed the applicant will have reasonable use of the subject property and the disturbance area will be limited to the north-east corner closest to the existing subdivision cul-de sac. They are required to improve the right of way past the cul-de sac on public right of way that is currently unimproved. The applicant will be required to remediate all buffer areas as the entire site is encumbered with a rehabilitation plan and 5-years of monitoring with a performance bond. I've attached some plans for your information. Let me know if you have any further questions- see my phone number below. Kind regards, Leila L. Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner Federal Way C •,. nn1 — {"rqr -tie r:.; f From: Michelle Larson -Gridley [mallto:MGrldleyi rnsn..c_om1 Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2019 6:43 PM To: Ping Inquiry Subject: project location parcel 302104-9007 We were advised that there has been a request to be able to build a single home in this wetlands area. That area is a swamp and habitat for a myriad of wildlife, which with all of the construction going on in this close proximity, it is very distressing that there is a plan for more construction on this property that is wetland, and has long been considered non buildable. I would like to know where the placement of the home is requested please. Full disclosure our home backs up to this property and for 20 years we have worked and enjoyed the wildlife that lives in this wetland. From woodpeckers, to eagles and hawks, to owls and a symphony of frogs in the spring, and rabbits, racoons, fox, and pocket gophers, duck families in the ponds each spring, opossum, just to name a few. Our address is 835 SW 355T" CT. We as neighbors we hoping to put in an offer for the property to keep it as the rare pristine oasis it is, but the offer came in prior and we could only do a back up. Thank you for your information about the proposed plans. Michelle Gridley STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Ken Spurrell, being first duly sworn on oath that he is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Federal Way Mirror a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Federal Way Mirror has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Federal Way Mirror (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, (Ad #861006) a: City Notice Published 1 time(s) beginning on 06/14/2019 and ending on 06/14/2019. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $135.82. Ken Spurrell Legal Advertising Representative, Federal ay Mirror Subscribed and sworn to me this 14th day of June, 2019. l��...■ra�r F till Bit C) t �nF WASN��►`~ Residing in Tacoma, Washington City of Federal Way, Community Dev Dept FWM861006 C C 0 6� ?3 6f N C Y U t6 C C 9� W C C N E CO cWC p RQCUO QO m O000 N-C O'�pCjU G V-- l./) ti = m 2 y R 7 w U p. p U N m U N LL O C N R i R O O cm ca O N L C a `3 C C. = V1 `p a 0 0 fl_ E E a� �� rno �in�Qv�0i m �H oam� aFa °oo� J C as pp NN .y. a= o� da m R d 3 � U� yN� N R .E y [O U N C Q y _ N d C p 0 w L O p r O) N w t= R U N -p .A+'- C d N O U O� <d N CD E 01 (O = LL •- C!J O R f/J .- a a •` a Q a ca m 2 n QQ rn; m c N �'-'� Y 7 U aci C7 E a� 7 o . m c w Or n�hO C Od RO R E O NLL N N = N p fq y R RM a�N m w a1 ai d�� a�2� E~ mac[ m$a �� r�arn�p�cco Vag y na�$a=o�3 a�i°'G _Ec� s O a E Rco S. EUit: -r m S R p Ry `w p- g p.a.- RtoLL-:3o?.o.R=sin a__N .y,• ymct�na�o R�°�d°� c�Q iO Y y z N4 CO N- O'� C •6U fn6��LL0 d V N R L g Vs O p'R�CD _ s�LU LLEa g o��oaee= oaF. �� m�yE4o'a•�ac,p�a=ESE= r y o cm.� ot3�U ov-x a a o -CC `?;z o 0 oi�a� 2 n�-_ii'-3 E� �Q� o� c.aac �'o•Am�c'yeRa'.Em�a°'��u� OCa�m3�<ae�c�na�r�8o>.o a_Yu=m dm_a» Rom' cn -> arc,' -pR R m Qn LL E w` Q N ._ Ci E O as E C 1 y wR.. T N L LL 7. N E C 7�LL mc ar.. ac,c.-amc=oE`dm�cy wZ°o>�m+%� °a�Zod�=oRa"�n"a' Eou��oo3 »au 0 E000� v o ¢ �.'- v, a °' .r v en L V �.= m o e_ w y Rio o Z'o o va aoo�'a'o� o�``� cc > >a � � c M°:a� o�aci�Z'�2 SIC, N N O N '� C a r O ee ee la m .� �, O O� 0 0 .`J e C 0 of y N O 6f E5 C` N' GO C dc]d O)Q 52-CC oaCC 3CLI. -:=.. w 5 R Eck+ CJm fn._ aY (O_d:rUCMO) O CITY OF Federal Way Project Name: COMMUNrrV DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 nlrminS@citvof edmiwar•.cnm wwu �[tyo ffrderMlwny.cmn NOTICE OF APPLICATION SIGN INSTALLATION CERTIFICATE Project File No: — li Y .0 r Project Address: 2 ,A �Q Installed By: VLZ Date of Installation: Location of Installation: 1 — ", tSG — *Please forward pictures of the posted sign to the project's planner.* MU e ie�i■ ie�ie �e ■e �e ■e is ia�ia is is i.'�e ra-ia ie�i e��e ie is-ii ie 6e is ie-ie s1 ie a i4 i .. • . a • • e e m v • • w . • e� e. r e • • e • e• •.. r• •r. r. •� r� •. ai �•. I hereby testify that the sign installed fully complies with the installation standards outlined in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19 `Zoning and Development Code' and that the sign will be maintained until a fmal decision is issued on the land use action and/or environmental threshold determination. I understand that failure to return this certificate within five days of posting may result in delays, notice of corrections, and re -mailings at the applicant's expense. AM 19 ray installer's N Date e Installer's " re 2s3 - 2,2-C'J y-'_ 196 7 Phone Bulletin #036 March 7, 2018 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Sign Installation Certificate . A CIT Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cit offederalwa .corn DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION i, -2- k v_ h hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: 04Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document } was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or '®posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 20 q. Project Name File Number(s) Signature L'—� _ L '� Date I:\Declaration of Distdbution.doc/Last printed 8/11 /2017 11:45:00 AM Posted Sites: Federal Way City Hall: 33325 8th Ave South Federal Way Library: 34200 1 It Way South Federal Way 320th Library: 848 S. 320th St I:\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 8/11 /2017 11:45:00 AM A DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8'" Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 CITY OF cit o€ a eralwa .com Federal Way DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, E. Tina Piety hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: 0 Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document Was ❑ emailed 0 mailed ❑ faxed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on June 13, 2019. Project Name Shablevsi Residence - Wetland Buffer Avera in File Number(s)-102396-UP & 1 100218-SM Signature _ `� Date June 13 2019 � 1 CITY OF Fe d e ra l ICIO'ay NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Shablevskiy Residence — Wetland Buffer Averaging Project Description: Proposal to construct a single-family residence limited to a 1,600 square foot building footprint and site improvements in a wetland buffer. Applicant: Vitahy & Tatyana Shablevskiy Project Location: Off of SW 35411, Avenue SW, Federal Way, King County Parcel #302104-9007 Date of Application: May 16, 2019 Date Determined Complete: June 10, 2019 Date of Notice of Application: June 14, 2019 Public Comments Due: July 1, 2019 Requested Decision and Other Permits Included with this Application: The applicant requests a Use Process III decision (file #19-102396-UP) issued by the Community Development Director pursuant to Federal lFlay Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.65 and 19 145 090 Additional Files in conjunction with this application include WSJ 0"61 I `849 1 033 �4 �s I ,93 .834 / �830 S I .826 � 1 as ,926 �627 �. .819 fJ3 .930 .15922 LS 811 6807 .803� s29 ^I a Street Modification Request (file #19-100218-SM) and future construction permits. Environmental Documents: Critical Areas Report and Buffer Averaging, by Beaver Creek Environmental Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 16, "Surface Water Management" and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code." Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including but not limited to: the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal Way Revised Code, 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by the City of Federal Way, and the Public Works Department Development Standards. Public Comment & Appeals: The official project file is available for public review at the Community Development Department (City Hall, 2-1 Floor, 33325 8t" Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003). Any person may submit written comments on the Use Process III application to the Director of Community Development by July 1, 2019. Only the applicant, persons who submit written comments to the director, or persons who specifically request a copy of the original decision may appeal the director's decision. Comments sent by email should be directed to: nlann n .cityoffederalwaycoM. Availability of File and Environmental Documents: The official project file and referenced environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Community Development Department (address above). Staff Contact: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, 253-835-2644, leila.willoughbr-oakes sio offedeialway.com Printed in the Federal Way MirrorJune 14, 2019 19-102396 Doc ID 79177 Parcel number 0662310640 0662310650 0662310660 0662310670 0662310680 0662310750 0662310760 0662310770 0662310780 0662310790 0662310800 0662310810 0662310820 0662310830 0662310840 0662310850 0662310860 0662310870 0662310880 0662310890 0662310900 0662310910 0662310920 0662310930 0662310940 •�--ZM4-949pQ6 3021049007 3021049076 3021049078 3021049080 3021049081 3833000005 3833000010 3833000012 3833000015 4405600070 4405600075 4405600080 4405600085 4405600090 4405600235 5028601850 5028601860 1 5028601870 5028601880 Taxpayer name DUNN KEVEN E+KATHRYN M CHA JOE BAE AUGUST#NEC YAGHOOBI DAVID CHO DONG H WOO TAI MING MICHAEL THOMAS MICHAEL J+KiSHA BILODEAU THOMAS E+CANDY L KIM KEITH Y KIENZLE GREGORY D+KiMBERLY FLANIGAN EDWARD V CZUK MARY H+MITCHELL F MEDANI LOUISA OBIOMA WOO JAE HWAN+HYUN JOO OH SUN M+OH NICOLE H+OH NAT PAK CHAEWOO+SUNGNAN GRIDLEY MICK£Y+MICHELLE LEE CHANG KYOUNG+KUNL CHOI CHRISTINE H+JOHN C BILYEU CAROLYN AND MATTHEW TRAN JAMES P+XUAN T NGUYEN PHAN MINH CALUGAY RUBEN S LE CHINH V LEE KIN CHRIS E KING BIBLE FELLO SHABL IY ANA+ SIME EMEBET+NESANET ROBLEDO RAFAEL SHABLEVSKIY TA AB OWEN PATRICIA J H (TTEE) OWEN PATRICIA J H (TTEE) FEDERAL WAY CITY OF HUNT SAMUEL MATTHEWS WALIMAA SANDRA J LOONEY EDELTRAUD S+YEE PAME TANKERSLEY FAY L PRESBA DANIEL W RICHARDS DONALD T BLUE ADRIAN D+SHAWNA M STARR ALAN W+GAREN A SHAY HARM❑N L+JAMIE M NGUYEN EACH+LAN NGUYEN LOC PHUOC+PHUNG HUYE KOEFFLER ASON C+TESSA J TOMUZ VIOREL+ANA GARAZ Parcel address 857 SW 354TH ST 849 SW 354TH ST 841 SW 354TH ST 833 SW 354TH ST 825 SW 354TH ST 35447 8TH AVE SW 35455 8TH AVE SW 806 SW 355TH CT 816 SW 355TH CT 822 SW 355TH CT 826 SW 355TH CT 813 SW 354TH ST 830 SW 355TH CT 834 SW 355TH CT 838 SW 355TH CT 839 SW 355TH CT 835 SW 355TH CT 831 SW 355TH CT 827 SW 355TH CT 823 SW 355TH CT 819 SW 355TH CT 815 SW 355TH CT 811 SW 355TH CT 807 SW 355TH CT 803 SW 355TH CT 35448 11TH AVE SW 2940 57th Ave NE 922 SW 356TH ST 930 SW 356TH ST 2940 57th Ave NE 926 SW 356TH ST 926 SW 356TH ST 33325 8th Ave S 846 SW 354TH ST 852 SW 354TH ST PO Box 1435 1015 SW 356TH ST 1001 SW 356TH ST 931 SW 356TH ST 925 SW 356TH ST 905 SW 356TH ST 820 SW 356TH ST 35344 10TH PL SW 35348 10TH PL SW 1 35352 10TH PL SW 35358 10TH PL SW Jurisdiction FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY Tacoma FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY Tacoma FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY Tacoma FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY Zip code 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 1 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98422 98023 98023 98422 98023 98023 98003 98023 98023 98401 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 98023 Appraise d value 503000 495000 519000 485000 503000 494000 495000 503000 494000 521000 531000 514000 481000 497000 506000 507000 495000 495000 524000 497000 507000 494000 506000 507000 493000 1620300 80000 358000 329000 67000 438000 75000 546000 546000 9000 337000 366000 407000 331000 248000 248000 326000 324000 402000 367000 Assess or's Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10 11 12 13 14 151 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 2$ 29 311 321 331 341 35 36 371 381 391 401 41 421 431 44 45 461 VA RECEIVED MAY 16 2019 CRY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 'ing County Parcel Viewer https:Hgismaps.k;-- -county.gov/parcelviewer2//?pin=3021049007 49 1S 7Q H N ry rV J. i1l.2 ;11 +1� -ry �N I r13G3 `may' as 27 o?_49"i5 35631 35 1 0 —g— i *t�tgSiPVGOAS 35634 35i OJ20 CxAil �5642 3�5 n�.a� 1 swz� ;T2Er356 Is6D A_ 5S 9 by: Address Search Find Intersection Zoom to Advanced tools u Basemaps RECEIVED MAY 16 2019 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNrFY DEVELOPMEN' l of 2 5/16/2019, 7:23 AM CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www,cit offederolwa .corn DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, E. 7-ilia Piety hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: El Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document Was 121 emailed ❑ mailed ❑ faxed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on June 17, , 2019. Project Name Shablevskiy Residence - Wetland Buffer Averaging_ File Number(s) 1 10239G-UP & I 100218-SM Signature t ~ _ Date June 11, 2019 A�k CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Shablevskiy Residence — Wetland Buffer Averaging Project Description: Proposal to construct a single-family residence limited to a 1,600 square foot building footprint and site improvements in a wetland buffer. Applicant: Vitaliy & Tatyana Shablevskiy Project Location: Off of SW 354th Avenue SW, Federal Way, King County Parcel #302104-9007 Date of Application: May 16, 2019 Date Determined Complete: June 10, 2019 Date of Notice of Application: June 14, 2019 Public Comments Due: July 1, 2019 Requested Decision and Other Permits Included with this Application: The applicant requests a Use Process III decision (file #19-102396-UP) issued by the Community Development Director pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.65 and 19.t45.090. Additional files in conjunction with this application include a Street Modification Request (file #19-100218-SM) and future construction permits. Environmental Documents: Critical Areas Report and Buffer Averaging, by Beaver Creek Environmental Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Tide 16, "Surface Grater Management" and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code." Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including but not limited to: the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal [V/iy Revised Costa, 2016 King Couigy Surface IFlalerDesign Manual as amended by the City of Federal Way, and the Public Works Department Development Slandardr. Public Comment & Appeals: The official project file is available for public review at the Community Development Department (City Hall, 2nd Floor, 33325 81h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003). Any person may submit written comments on the Use Process III application to the Director of Community Development by July 1, 2019. Only the applicant, persons who submit written comments to the director, or persons who specifically request a copy of the original decision may appeal the director's decision. Comments sent by email should be directed to: plannin a.cityoffederalway. Availability of File and -Environmental Documents: The official project file and referenced environmental documents are available for public review during'normal business hours at the Community Development Department (address above). Staff Contact: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, 253-835-2644, leila wlloughbv-oaken c cityoffederalway-co Printed in the Federal Way MirrorJune 14, 2019 19-102396 Doc ID 79177 Tina Piety From: Ken Spurrell <legals@tacomadailyindex.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 4:27 PM To: Tina Piety Cc: Leila Willoughby -Oakes Subject: Re: Legal Notice Received, thank you. Ken Spurrell Publisher Direct: 253-232-5219 Internal: 15001 Fax: 253-627-2253 15 Oregon Ave, Suite 101, Tacoma, WA 98409 191 Sound Publishing Map Print Rates Online Rates Media Kit Sound Info On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 4:22 PM Tina Piety alwa .comma wrote: Hello, Please publish the attached legal notice (Shablevshiy Residence — Wetland Buffer Averaging NOA, 19- 102396-UP) in the Federal Way Mirror's Friday (6/14/2019) issue. Please furnish an affidavit of publication. This is for the Community Development account 83722477. Thank you, Tina E. Tina Piety, CAP, OM Administrative Assistant II Fe�erai Warr Community Development Department 4ik CITY OF Federal way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Shablevskiy Residence -Wetland Buffer Averaging Project Description: Proposal to construct a single family residence limited to a 1,600 sf building footprint and site improvements in a wetland buffer. Applicant: Vitaliy & Tatyana Shablevskiy Project Location: Off of SW 35411, Ave SW, Federal Way King County Parcel #302104-9007 Date of Application: May 16, 2019 Date Determined Complete: June 10, 2019 Date of Notice of Application: June 14, 2019 Public Comments.Due: July 1, 2019 Requested Decision and Other Permits Included with this Application: The applicant requests a Use Process III decision (file #19-102396-UP) issued by the Community Development Director pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.65 and 19.145.090. Additional files in conjunction with this application include Street Modification Request (file #19-100218-SM) and future construction permits. L 0�1 S9 • •83s / p3 f •830 1 �31 J� 22 •926 - .82a f 4 •816 •3 •823 � �06' •s 19 u ��'i •930 •BssA �" •807 •g031 •922 I 810 i N Environmental Documents: Critical Areas Report and Buffer Averaging, by Beaver Creek Environmental Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 16, "Surface Water Management" and Tide 19, "Zoning and Development Code." Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including but not limited to: the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal Way Revised Code, 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by the City of Federal Way, and the Public Works Department Development Standards. Public Comment & Appeals: The official project file is available for public review at the Community Development Department (City Hall, 2^d Floor, 33325 8f Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003). Any person may submit written comments on the Use Process III application to the Director of Community Development by July 1, 2019. Only the applicant, persons who submit written comments to the director, or persons who specifically request a copy of the original decision may appeal the director's decision. Comments sent by email should be directed to: 121anninggcit5,oEfecieralmmy.com. Availability of File and Environmental Documents: The official project file and referenced environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Community Development Department (address above). Staff Contact: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, 253-835-2644, ila.willou h naf;es ci offederalwa .com Printed in the Federal Way Mirror June 14, 2019 CITY HALL 1%CITY OF 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325FederaIay (253) 835-7000 Centered on Opportunity www.cityoffederalway..com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Vitaliy and Tanya Shablevskiy June 10, 2019 2940 57th Avenue NE Tacoma, WA 98422 FILE ii h i 1 vs ' ail. - m Re: File #19-102396-00-UP; LETTER OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Shablevsly Wetland Buffer Averaging, Parcel No. 302104-9007, Federal Way Dear Mr. and Ms. Shablevskiy: The Community Development Department is in receipt of your May 16, 2019, project submittal. Your proposed project includes a wetland buffer averaging request of a single-family lot that is encumbered by critical areas/buffers. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Please consider this corespondence a formal Letter of Complete Application for Use Process III Project Review. Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.15.045, the application is deemed complete as of the date of this letter. The complete application determination is based on a review of your submittal relative to those requirements as set forth in FWRC 19.15.040. The submittal requirements are not intended to determine if an application conforms to the City of Federal Way codes; they are used only to determine if all required materials have been submitted. Please note a wetland buffer exception request for tax parcel 302104-9079, directly south, requires a separate land use application, review, and permit fee(s). CLOSING Formal processing and review of your application will now begin. Technical review comments will follow at a later date. Within 14 days of this letter, a Notice of Application will be published in the Federal Way Mirror, posted on site, placed at the city's official notice boards, and mailed to the persons receiving the property tax statements for all property within 300 feet of each boundary of the subject property. You will be contacted soon regarding placing the public notice board on the property. Any questions concerning your application may be directed to me at 253-835-2644, or leila.willoughby-oakes@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, G5 Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner c: Kevin Peterson, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue Steve Quarterman, Landau Associates Vitaliy Shablevsltiy, dirn-aconstruction ri vahoox m Doi, I.D. 79173 19-102396-00-1IP CITY OF Federal Way Centered on Opportunity June 7, 2019 Vitaliy and Tanya Shablevskiy 2940 57th Avenue NE Tacoma, WA 98422 taniashabl .c CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor FILE Re: File #19-102396-00-UP; WETLAND BUFFER AVERAGING (REVIEW ESTIMATE) Shablevsly Residence, *No Site Address*, Parcels 302104-9007 & 302104-9079 Dear Mr. and Ms. Shablevskiy: Please find the enclosed consultant task authorization with a scope of work for review of the Wetland and Stream Evaluationl Delineation Report and BrrferAveraging Plan - X' SW 35611, Sireet. The separtment's consultant, Landau Associates, was asked to provide an estimate for their review of information prepared by Beaver Creek Environmental Services Inc. in May 2019. The normal course of action is for the city to set up an account to be funded by the applicant and drawn down by the work performed by Landau Associates. Please note that if any of the funds are not used, they will be returned to the applicant. A check in the amount of $7,755, payable to the City of Federal Way, and a signature on the authorization form must be submitted in order for the review to begin. Please note —this fee will cover the review of the materials, field review, technical memorandum(s), and one report resubmittal. Additional reviews or meetings beyond that will require a supplemental cost and authorization. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please contact me at 253-835-2644, or leila.v,iRou hbv-oaken ci ffederalwa .com. Sincerely, (-� d<�-) -Oc-� Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner enc: Task Authorization Form Environmental Review Fee Invoice Doc. I.D 79258 19-102396-00-UP RESUBMITTED Beaver Creek Environmental Services, Inc. FEB 1 8 2Z2� C�U�� DEV� A '* WETLAND AND STREAM EVALUATION AND DELINEATION REPORT and BUFFER AVERAGING PLAN SHABLEVSKIY PROJECT SITE Federal Way File #19-102396-UP Xxx SW 3561" St. City of Federal Way, WA PARCEL # 3021049079 & 3021049007 NE Y4 of the NW'/4 Sect. 15, Township 23 North, Range 04 East, W.M. REVISED Based on City of Federal Way Review prepared for Mr. Vitaliy Shablevskiy 92 SW 354t" Street Federal Way, WA 98023 (253)228-4867 dimaconstruction@yahoo.com prepared by Beaver Creek Environmental Services, Inc. POB 731695 Puyallup, WA 98373 253 732-6515 MHeckert@Q.com January 23, 2020 REV 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Shablevskiy Project Site is approximately 88,141 sq. ft. total size and located in the City of Federal Way, King County, Washington. The project site is comprised of two parcels (Parcel # 3021049079 & 3021049007). The project site is dominated by mature and sub -mature forest. Onsite assessment of the project site following the procedures outlined in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Wash. Manual) the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual Regional Supplement: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region(CoE Manual), and Revised Washington State Wetland Rating System (WSWRS) resulted in the identification of two areas that exhibited hydric soils, wetland hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation consistent with the established criteria of both the Wash. and COE Manual. This assessment, completed in accordance with City of Federal Way regulations, included an evaluation of the function and value rating for the identified wetlands, a classification of the wetland following the U.S. Fish and Wildlife methods, and an identification of the standard City of Federal Way buffer width required for these wetlands. WETLAND SIZE CITY OF WA WETLAND GENERAL Adjustment by Buffer (square FEDERAL WAY RATING BUFFER Function And Total feet) CLASS SCORE WIDTH Land Use A *9,690 II 20 105 ft. 0 ft. 105 ft. B 5,263 II 20 105 ft. 0 ft. 105 ft. *denotes wetland continues offsite The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and City of Federal Way, as well as a number of other local, state, and federal agencies, regulate activities in and around identified wetland and drainage corridor areas. Such regulations focus on the avoidance of adverse impacts to wetlands, streams, associated buffers and the mitigation of such impacts that cannot be avoided. City of Federal Way has established criteria to categorize wetlands for purposes of regulation and the establishment of buffers. In addition, City of Federal Way allows a limited amount of alterations to wetlands (i.e. isolated wetlands, roadway crossings) provided such impacts are mitigated pursuant to an approved mitigation plan. The Selected Action Plan of the Shablevskiy project site focuses on the creation of a single-family house site consistent with the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. Through site planning the project team has been able to design the building site and associated utilities/roadways to avoid adversely impacting the identified onsite wetlands or their protective buffer areas to the maximum extent possible in building a single-family house. Because of site wetland constraints, the standard buffer of the house must be averaged to accommodate placement of the house. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 1 STUDYPURPOSE......................................................................................................... 1 SITEDESCRIPTION................................................................................................ 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION................................................................................... 2 NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAPPING .................................................... 2 STATE OF WASHINGTON PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES ......................... 2 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SENSITIVE AREAS MAPPING ...................................... 2 SOILSMAPPING........................................................................................................... 3 ONSITE EVALUATION - WETLANDS.......................................................................... 4 WETLANDSTUDY METHODS................................................................................... 4 FIELDOBSERVATION................................................................................................ 5 WETLAND AND STREAM DETERMINATION............................................................ 6 STREAMSDETERMINATION.................................................................................... 7 WETLAND FUNCTION AND VALUE ASSESSMENT ................................................. 7 ONSITE WETLAND VALUATION............................................................................. 8 MITIGATIONPLAN......................................................................................................... 9 SELECTEDACTION PLAN........................................................................................... 10 REFERENCELIST.......................................................................................................... 11 APPENDIXA................................................................................................................... 12 ATTACHMENT1............................................................................................................ 13 STANDARD OF CARE Prior to extensive site planning, this document should be reviewed and the wetland boundaries verified by the appropriate resource and permitting agencies. Wetland boundaries, wetland classifications, wetland ratings, and all proposed wetland restoration and enhancement activities must be reviewed and approved by City of Federal Way and potentially other regulatory staff. The above consultants have provided professional services that are in accordance with the degree of care and skill generally accepted in the nature of the work accomplished. No other warranties are expressed or implied. The consultant is not responsible for design costs incurred before this document is approved by the appropriate resource and permitting agencies. Mark Heckert Beaver Creek Environmental Services, Inc. INTRODUCTION This report details the culmination of activities and onsite evaluations undertaken to complete a wetlands evaluation as an element of the planning and site development of the Shablevskiy Project Site. The project area is 88,141 sq. ft. and generally located in the City of Federal Way, King County, Washington (Figure 1). The evaluation and delineation of onsite and adjacent wetlands and drainage corridors is a vital element in the planning and selection of a site development action. The goal of this approach is to assure that planned site platting does not result in adverse environmental impacts to such areas. 3 {T aW'✓t 3 ,•. a•r wi►a� +w.tn,a •a . ,aaBr,•a'� 1 Wl.a i •w n :� � b i a wJJ ems 9 Tw a59M P � • a S E $ 4 'Sources Esri,aa .a.., HERE Figure 1. Vicinity Map Wetlands are generally defined as "those areas of City of Federal Way that are inundated or saturated by ground or surface water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." (City of Federal Way CAO). STUDY PURPOSE This purpose of this document is to present the results of the onsite assessment and evaluation of the wetland/drainage corridor areas within the project area. Included within this report is an assessment of the proposed impacts and actions to be taken to ensure that proposed onsite actions do not adversely impact environmentally sensitive areas. This study was designed to accommodate site planning and potential regulatory actions. Shablevskiy— Federal Way 1 CAD Report — REV 2 This report is suitable for submittal to federal, state, and local authorities for wetland boundary verification and permitting actions. SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is comprised of two parcels (Parcel # 3021049079 & 3021049007). The project site is dominated by mature and sub -mature forest and is vacant of development. The forested portion of the site is dominated by a mixed forested plant community of mature Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesh) and mature big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum). The project site is generally sloping to the west, draining to the south. There is a ditch channel transecting south from Wetland B to the City storm drain system at 356th St.. BACKGROUND INFORMATION NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAPPING The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) mapping completed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This mapping resource did not identify any wetlands within, or in proximity to, the project site. STATE OF WASHINGTON PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES The State of Washington Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) Mapping was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This mapping resource identified no priority habitats or species within or adjacent to the project site. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SENSITIVE AREAS MAPPING The City of Federal Way Wetland Inventory was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This mapping resource identified one wetland on the project site (Figure 2). This wetland was identified as 30-21-4-114. WETLAND SIZE CLASSIFICATION PROPOSED HYDRO. SUMMARY (sgft) (USFWS) RATING SURFACE COMMENTS CONDTIONS 30-21-4-114 25,200 PSS POW II WL is isolated depression w/ lots of water Shablevskiy— Federal Way 2 CAD Report — REV 2 4 ap��j�•.� ; ,.•.,� �� islab � - !� — _ low Olt IL �` r Figure 2. City of Federal Way CWl Map SOILS MAPPING A review of the mapping of soil types within the project area completed by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) identified that the onsite soils consist primarily of Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. This soil is described as: Ap6 - Alderwood gravelly sandy loam: This series consists of moderately well drained soils that have a weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated substratum at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. This soil is on uplands and formed in glacial deposits. A typical pedon of Alderwood soils from 0 -12 inches is dark brown (10YR 4/3) gravelly sandy loam. From 12 to 27 inches the soil is grayish - brown (2.5YR 5/2) gravelly sandy loam with many medium, distinct mottles. This soil series is not listed as a hydric soil. Shablevskiy— Federal Way 3 CAD Report — REV 2 Figure 3. NRCS Soils Map ONSITE EVALUATION -WETLANDS WETLAND STUDY METHODS Presently accepted wetland identification is based on a three parameter criteria test as established within both the CoE Manual and the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Wash. Manual). These criteria are: 1. A predominance of hydrophytic vegetation. 2. The presence of hydric soils, and 3. The presence of wetland hydrology. Initial onsite assessment and evaluation was completed January 22, 2019. Assessment transects were established on a north/south pattern through the project area. Wetland assessment within the project site followed the methods and procedures outlined in both the Wash. Manual and the CoE Manual. Onsite assessment noted that there were no differences in the identified wetland boundaries as a result to using either the Wash. Manual or the CoE Manual. Drainage corridors were assessed and identified in accordance with the criteria established by City of Federal Way and the State of Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Forest Practice Rules (WAC 222- 16-030). Shablevskiy— Federal Way 4 CAD Report — REV 2 The boundary between wetland and non -wetland areas was established by examining the transitional gradient between wetland criteria along transects through the site. Delineation was performed using the routine methodology for areas less than five acres as detailed in the CoE Manual. Field data sheets are provided in Appendix A. Identified boundaries were marked in the field with number flagging. These boundaries were then surveyed and made a part of the site plan mapping. FIELD OBSERVATION Vegetation The dominant onsite species was Douglas fir and big leaf maple. These mature trees formed open stands across the treed portion of the site. Additional tree species occurring onsite included Western red cedar (Thuja plicata), Western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), red alder (Alnus rubra), black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), cherry (Prunus spp), and cascara (Rhamnus purshiana). The understory included a wide variety of shrubs and herb species including vine maple (Acer circinatum), salal (Gaultheria shallon), Oregon grape (Berberis spp.), hazelnut (Corylus cornuta), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procera), evergreen blackberry (Rubus laciniatus), Pacific red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), snowberry (Symphoricarpus albus), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilium), and sword fern (Polystichum munitum). Throughout the project site this plant community had been altered by prior management actions. This plant community was identified as non- hydrophytic (i.e. typical of non -wetlands). In the center of the site a distinct depression occurs. The plant community in this area is shrub -scrub, dominated by salmonberry, spiraea (Spiraea douglash), slough sedge (Carex obnupta), buttercup (Ranunculus repens), reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), softrush, and lady fern (Athyrium filix-femina), with alder and cottonwood occurring in the southern portion of the wetland. This feature was apparently created or enlarged for water retention. This plant association was identified as hydrophytic in character (i.e. typical of wetlands). In the south center of the site a distinct depression occurs associated with a ditch which flows off -site to the south. The plant community in this area is alder and cottonwood. This plant association was identified as hydrophytic in character (i.e. typical of wetlands). o Soils As identified by numerous sample plots throughout the project site, the majority of the site exhibited a soil profile typical of the Alderwood soil series. The soil was defined as gravelly sandy loam with a soil matrix color of dark brown (10YR 3/3) to brown (10YR 4/4). These soils did not exhibit redoximorphic features such as prominent soil mottles, oxidized root channels, or glayed soil layers within the first 20 inches of soil depth. The majority of the project site exhibited soil which would not be considered "hydric." Shablevskiy— Federal Way 5 CAD Report — REV 2 Representative sample plots are identified. (Special note - many more sample plots were completed during the field assessment than are reported within Appendix A). Sample plots within the defined depressions exhibited a mixed gravelly loam soil texture. These soils appeared to be mineral in character. Soils ranged in color from very dark brown (10YR 3/1) to dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2). Redoximorphic features were present and often very prominent. Soils within these areas exhibited "hydric" characteristics. ■ Hydrology Onsite hydrology appeared to be the result of seasonal stormwater runoff from onsite and adjacent properties. Stream flow in the ditch is seasonal, and has zero flow during the summer months. In addition, the pattern of surface water movement appeared to have been modified by prior land use activities. These activities have included the development of offsite homesites, the development of roadways and utilities, and the placement of culverts. The general movement of surface water runoff across the site was generally to the west and south. Surface water through the site was captured in the stream which occurs at the south of the site. Within the depression, evidence of seasonal soil saturation was documented. This area was in a small depression, and had been impacted by prior land use actions (i.e. damming, grazing, compaction, pasture management). Based on field indicators (i.e. water stained leaves, drift lines, soil saturation, oxidized root channels, wetland drainage pattern) this depression met the wetland hydrology criteria of the CoE Manual and the Wash. Manual. This depression drained through a created ditch, through the wetland in the southwest corner, into the stream at the southwest site corner. Within the ditch area evidence of seasonal soil saturation was also documented. This area had been impacted by prior and on -going land use actions (i.e. residential development). Based on field indicators (i.e. water stained leaves, drift lines, soil saturation, oxidized root channels, wetland drainage pattern) this depression met the wetland hydrology criteria of the CoE Manual and the Wash. Manual. WETLAND AND STREAM DETERMINATION Wetland determination was based on sample plots which contained hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology in accordance with the CoE Manual and the Wash. Manual. Based on these methods two wetland areas were identified onsite (Attachment 1 a). Two areas were identified onsite to exhibit characters typical of a "stream" (i.e. a continuous pattern of surface water movement, either permanent or intermittent). Shablevskiy— Federal Way 6 CAD Report — REV 2 WETLAND SIZE CITY OF WA WETLAND GENERAL Adjustment by Buffer (square FEDERAL WAY RATING BUFFER Function And Total feet) CLASS SCORE WIDTH Land Use A -9,690 II 20 105 ft. 0 ft. 105 ft. B 5,263 II 20 105 ft. 0 ft. 105 ft. *denotes wetland continues offsite Wetland A: This wetland was identified in the center of the site. This wetland was dominated by a shrub plant community. This wetland exhibited shallow ponded surface water during the winter and early growing season as a result of topography. Wetland A was identified to meet the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) criteria for classification as palustrine, shrub -scrub, seasonally flooded/saturated (PSSE). Based on WSWRS score of 20, this wetland complex was identified to meet the criteria for designation as a City of Federal Way Cat. 2 Wetland. The standard buffer for a Cat. 2 Wetland is 105 ft. as measured perpendicular to the wetland edge. Wetland B: This wetland was identified in the southern portion of the site. This wetland was dominated by a shrub plant community. This wetland exhibited shallow ponded surface water during the winter and early growing season as a result of topography. Wetland A was identified to meet the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) criteria for classification as palustrine, shrub -scrub, seasonally flooded/saturated (PSSE). Based on WSWRS score of 20, this wetland complex was identified to meet the criteria for designation as a City of Federal Way Cat. 2 Wetland. The standard buffer for a Cat. 2 Wetland is 105 ft. as measured perpendicular to the wetland edge. STREAMS DETERMINATION A ditch transected the project site south from southern terminus of Wetland B to the parcel to the south. From there it enters into a storm drain. As such, this tributary meets the criteria for designation as a City of Federal Way Type Ns: seasonal non -fish habitat stream. The standard buffer for a Type Ns stream is 35 ft. as measured perpendicular to the stream edge. Within the project area, the Aquatic Area buffer is subsumed by the wetland buffer for Wetland B. WETLAND FUNCTION AND VALUE ASSESSMENT Wetlands are known to perform significant roles in the ecosystem, some of which are of immediate value to society. These roles vary greatly with the size, type, hydrology, vegetation, and location of wetland areas. Although the ecological functions performed by these wetlands are complex, interrelated, and difficult to assess and quantify, methods have been developed for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (FGDC, 2013). The functions provided by wetlands include hydrologic support, shoreline protection, stormwater and floodwater storage, water quality, groundwater recharge, and provision of wildlife habitat. Shablevskiy— Federal Way 7 CAD Report — REV 2 CATEGORIZATION BASED ON FUNCTIONS The functions that a wetland performs are characterized by answering a series of questions that note the presence, or absence, of certain indicators. Indicators are easily observed characteristics that are correlated with quantitative or qualitative observations of a function (Hruby et al. 2000). De ressional or Flats Wetlands Potential to Improve Water Quality Potential to Reduce Flooding and Stream Erosion Riverine and Freshwater, Tidal Fringe Wetlands Potential to Improve Water Quality Potential to Reduce Flooding and Stream Erosion Opportunity to Reduce Flooding and Stream Erosion Lake -fringe Wetlands Potential to Improve Water Quality Opportunity to Improve Water Quality Potential to Reduce Shoreline Erosion Opportunity to Protect Resources from Shoreline Erosion Slope Wetlands Potential to Improve Water Quality Opportunity to Improve Water Quality Potential to Reduce Flooding and Stream Erosion Opportunity to Reduce Flooding and Erosion Functions Related to Habitat for All Classes of Wetlands Potential to Provide Habitat Opportunity to Provide Habitat Score and Category Based on Functions Wetlands that are Category I based on functions need to score 23 points or more. Total scores between 20-22 are Category II; 16-19 are Category III, and less than 16 are Category IV. ONSITE WETLAND VALUATION The wetland areas identified within the overall project area were evaluated following the functional value assessment process noted above. As identified in this assessment Wetland A would be considered to have the overall functional rating of Category II. Shablevskiy— Federal Way 8 CAD Report — REV 2 • Water Quality Functions — 8 points • Hydrologic Functions — 7 points • Habitat Functions — 5 points • TOTAL score for functions — 20 As identified in this assessment Wetland B would be considered to have the overall functional rating of Category II. • Water Quality Functions — 8 points • Hydrologic Functions — 7 points • Habitat Functions — 4 points • TOTAL score for functions — 20 MITIGATION PLAN The selected site development actions for the Shablevskiy residence is the development of a single-family residence consistent with the City of Federal Way comprehensive plan and local land use zoning. The creation of this residence will include the establishment of a house, and internal access for driveway and utilities. Through site planning the project team has been able to design the homesite and associated utilities to minimize adversely impacting the identified onsite wetland and stream. Mitigation planning followed the standard sequence; avoidance, minimization, mitigation. The house site was chosen to be in the least impactful area of the site. The house size was reduced to limit impact. The orientation was changed to better fit outside of the standard buffer. Ultimately, the buffer was reduced to accommodate the house, and enlarged in the northwest corner to mitigate the unavoidable impact of house placement. Due to the wetlands and their buffers encompassing almost the entire site, the house and access are sited in the northeast corner of the site as far as possible from the wetland boundary as building code allows (Att. 1 b). This is the least impactful site placement on the site. Placement of the house will require a buffer reduction of 1,703 sq. ft. and reduce the buffer to a minimum of 90 ft. from the wetland boundary. This is the minimum impact possible to siting a house on the site. Due to the fact that the site is 95% constrained by wetlands and their buffers, both the house placement and the buffer averaging areas are the ONLY possible locations for each feature. The house is in the ONLY area outside the wetland buffers. The buffer averaging area in the northwest corner is in the ONLY area remaining outside the buffer, and is the remainder of the parcel outside wetland buffers. Habitat functions are equivalent per unit of area. The buffer averaging scheme mandates 1.4 : 1 ratio of buffer averaged up to buffer averaged down, resulting in a 40% increase in the habitat preserved over required. The buffer will be averaged down by 1,703 sq. ft. around to the house. To capture equivalent square footage, the northwest corner of the site, 2,307 sq. ft. will be included Shablevskiy— Federal Way 9 CAD Report — REV 2 in the buffer. The ratio of buffer average increase to buffer reduction is 1.4 to 1, well over the required 1:1 ratio. Through this buffer averaging, the development will not result in a "net loss" of regulated wetland buffer area, function, or value. SELECTED ACTION PLAN The Selected Action Plan of the Shablevskiy Plat project site focuses on the creation of a single-family residential home site consistent with the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. A primary feature in the creation of this homesite lot will be the establishment of a protective buffer adjacent to the identified site wetlands and streams consistent with the City of Federal Way Critical Areas Ordinance. The buffer around the house must be diminished by 1,703 sq. ft. to accommodate placement of the house. The remaining buffer will be enlarged by 2,307 sq. ft. in the northwest corner to maintain buffer area. Temporary and long-term erosion control measures will be implemented. These measures include silt fencing during site preparation and seeding of exposed soil areas. No temporary or long-term impacts to the wetland or stream will occur as a result of the homesite placement. The standard buffer will be averaged. Shablevskiy— Federal Way 10 CAD Report — REV 2 REFERENCE LIST Adamus, P.R., E.J. Clairain Jr., R.D. Smith, and R.E. Young. 1987. Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET); Volume II: Methodology, Operational Draft Technical Report Y-87, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Office of Biological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, FWS/OBS-79/31. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, US army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. Federal Geographic Data Committee. 2013. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. FGDC-STD-004-2013. Second Edition. Wetlands Subcommittee, Federal Geographic Data Committee and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. Hitchcock, C.L., A. Cronquist. 1977. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press. Seattle, Washington. Horner, R.R. and K.J. Raedeke. 1989. Guide for Wetland Mitigation Project Monitoring. Washington State Department of Transportation. contract number GC8286, task 6. King County Department of Natural Resources. 1993. DRAFT Wildlife Management in King County: Issue Paper. Mikol, S.A. 1980. Field Guidelines for Using Transects to Sample Nongame Bird Populations. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service publication FWS/OBS - 80/58. Reppert, R.T., W. Sigleo, E. Stakhiv, L. Messman, and C. Meyers. 1979. Wetland Values - Concepts and Methods for Wetland Evaluation. Research Report 79-R1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soils Conservation Service. Soils Survey of King County Area Washington, Nov. 1973. Washington State Department of Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Publication Number 96-94. Washington State Department of Fisheries, Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization, Volume 1., 1975 Shablevskiy— Federal Way 11 CAD Report — REV 2 APPENDIX A FIELD DATA FORMS and WSWRS Rating forms Shablevskiy— Federal Way 12 CAD Report — REV 2 ATTACHMENT 1a & 1b WETLAND DELINEATION & BUFFER AVERAGING MAPS Shablevskiy— Federal Way 13 CAD Report — REV 2 STANDARD 105 ft buffer boundary i i f A31 - a A30 A32• f A5 ENO 45P1 W aA% SPIF PRESUMED WETLAND A _ + 4 ".BOUNDARY A3, A2 - f' � 1 i •• / MADRN SALAL aA1 a aSP 2U B Al \ B1a 180AP- B2 B11 \ B3 Wetland .a- - _ ...yB4 -,6610 aSP3W ■ B9 ASH SAP POPLAR B6 A5 B09` �001 `.,iB7 0 WETLAND A & B CONNECT DITCH 003 THRU SEPTUM a • Ir INDP UM HU KLEDITCIi005 7 006 y007 13 STANDARD 105 FT. WETLAND BUFFER ENCOMPASSES ENTIRE SITE EXCEPT AT NORTH BOUNDARY Beaver Creek Environmental Services 1 inch = 70 feet Att. 1 a MHeckert@Q.com 0 35 70 14Feet SHABLEVSKIY Fed Way 253 732 6515 Parcels # 3021049007 & 3021049079 October 20, 2019 Wetland Delineation Map From Survey LL r r r. r � � r r I r r r I I I I r r I IUi LU r / r / U? I 1 1 b o N LU l 1 r 0 r n I W r / CC r r / r w/ / r LPL / 1 L 1 -1 l / 1 ! / / I - U- I Cm �r 0) LO I CD, CT to l 1 ~ I co o \. T U- I \ \ d I \ \ \ f b I \ \ \ \ 1 \ N \ LL 1 \ \ LLCD \ \ 1 \ 1 \ r 1 \ 1 \ \ \ \ 3 1 / / 1 1 .0Arna-1>1 Tmr-- m —m } CD rn Z d N o O 0 cn �o am)Z o YM SZli > [--©� 0 c mrn m> <�t._ d U) N W O LL co LL i* m m U N d O N O N II O V N c T b T a N U N m c N E c O c O W U Y Ci Lo N �pl T V CO N tU UMW > N O N = LU m2NO Wetland name or number Dimitriv FedWav RATING SUMMARY —Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): Wetland AB Rated by M Heckert HGM Class used for rating Depressional & Flats Date of site visit: 22-Jan-19 Trained by Ecology?MesMo Date of training 15-May Wetland has multiple HGM classes?MesCNo NOTE: Form is not complete with out the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map ESRI King County, Cty of Fed Way OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY II (based on functions [tr special characteristics 0 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I - Total score = 23 - 27 X Category II - Total score = 20 - 22 Category III - Total score = 16 -19 Category IV - Total score = 9 -15 FW4L,TION bWMhV Quality I Hydrologic I Habitat List appropriate rating (H, M, L) Site Potential M M L Landscape Potential H H M Value H M M Total Score Based on 8 7 5 20 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC Category Estuarine Wetland of High Conservation Value Bog Mature Forest Old Growth Forest Coastal Lagoon Interdunal None of the above X Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H, H, H 8=H,H,M 7 = H, H, L 7=H,M,M 6=H,M,L 6 = M, M, M 5=H,L,L 5 = M, M, L 4=M,L,L 3 = L, L. L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 1 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number Dimitriy FedWay Maps and Figures required to answer questions correctly for Western Washington Depressional Wetlands Map of; To answer questions; Figure # Cowardin plant classes D 1.3, H 1.1, H 1.4 R1 Hydroperiods D 1.4, H 1.2 R2 Location of outlet (can be added to map of hydroperiods) D 1.1, D 4.1 R2 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to anotherfigure) D 2.2, D 5.2 R3 Map of the contributing basin D 4.3, D 5.3 R4 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2. 1, H 2.2, H 2.3 R4 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) D 3.1, D 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) D 3.3 Riverine Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes H 1.1, H 1.4 Hydroperiods H 1.2 Ponded depressions R 1.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to anotherfigure) R 2.4 Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants R 1.2, R 4.2 Width of unit vs. width of stream (can be added to anotherfigure) R 4.1 Map of the contributing basin R 2.2, R 2.3, R 5.2 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2. 1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) R 3.1 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) R 3.2, R 3.3 Lake Fringe Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes L 1.1, L4.1, H 1.1, H 1.4 Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants L 1.2 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another -figure) L 2.2 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2. 1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) L 3.1, L 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) L 3.3 Slope Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Fire Cowardin plant classes H 1.1, H 1.4 Hydroperiods H 1.2 Plant cover of dense trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants S 1.3 Plant cover of dense, rigid trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants (can be added to another figure ) S 4.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to anotherfigure) S 2.1, S 5.1 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) S 3.1. S 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) S 3.3 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 2 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number ❑linitriy PedWay HGM Classification of Wetland in Western Washington Fcr Cuestiorm. - ; the criteria dewibed mi,,st apply to this entire unit bewig rated. Whydrala& q xta figWd in each Wjest on do not apply to the e.rffire unit ben0 ratod, you probably have a unit �� -Ui mult;pls HGM dawes: In fibs cam, idstftKy which hydrolagis aftna in gtrest:ors 1 - 7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? Ell NO-goto2 0 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? 0 NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) DYES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. 13 NO - go to 3 ©YES - The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? 0 The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at any time of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; 0 At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). 0 NO - go to 4 DYES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? 0 The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), 0 The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. I' The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. 0 NO - go to 5 M ES - The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? [The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, Ef he overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. ENNO-goto6 DYES - The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number Dimitriv FedWav 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time during the year? This means that any outlet if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. ONO-goto7 MES - The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. ONO - go to 8 MES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM class to use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE if you are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Wetland Dimitriy WL AB Category II = 105 feet Final Buffer Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 4 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number Dimitriy FedWay DEPRESSIGNAL AND FLATS WET1A► 05 Water Quality FunOons - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 2 Mfetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 OVVetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points = 1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface or duff layer) is true clay or true organic (use NRCS 0 definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of ersistent Giants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants >'/2 of area points = 3 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/lo of area points = 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants < 1/lo of area points = 0 D 1.4. _Characteristics of seasonal ❑onding_o_r inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is >'/2 total area of wetland points = 4 4 Area seasonally ponded is >'/ total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < % total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above 9 Rating of Site Potential If score is: 1EN = H 6 - ZQA 0 - 5 = 0 Record the rating on the first page D 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 1 D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that 1 generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes = 1 No = 0 1 D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1 - D 2.3? 0 Source Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above 3 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 3 4M H i or EN 0 = L 0 Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, 1 lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? 1 Yes=1 No=O D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the 0 unit is found )? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above 2 Rating of Value If score is: EW H 1 EM 0 = tE record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number Dimitriy FedWav DEPRESSiONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points = 2 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage daring wet periods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 3 ©Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 Mhe wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft 6 inpoints = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. Mhe area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 3 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 DEntire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes abovel 8 Rating of Site Potential If score is: 12[X H 6 -1M 0 - 5 = (3 Record the rating on the first page D 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic function of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 1 D 5.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes=1 No=O 1 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes=1 No=O 1 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes abovel 3 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 3 =EE 1 or 4M 0 = L 0 Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest scoreif more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): r Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down - gradient of unit. points = 2 1 0 e Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down - gradient. points = 1 OFlooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points = 1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 Mhere are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood O conveyance in a regional flood controlplan? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above 1 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 6 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number Dimitriy FedWay Rating of value If score is: US H 1=EE o = l0 Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 7 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number Dimitriy FeclWay These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Mquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 0 OEmergent 3 structures: points = 2 [NScrub-shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points - 1 OForested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if : 0 The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested Poly2on H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or'/< ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods ). OPermanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 OSeasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 0 DOccasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 OSaturated only 1 types present: points = 0 OPermanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland OSeasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland ®Lake Fringe wetland 2 points OFreshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftz. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle 1 If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 - 19 species points = 1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams _ f � in this row are s' •� ` _ HIGH = 3 points �■� � �LJ Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 8 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number Dimitriy FedWav H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. OLarge, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long) OStanding snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland "Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) 2 OStable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cutshrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) C1At least 1/ ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Dlnvasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata ) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above 4 Rating of Site Potential If Score is: 15U = H 7 - 11l 0 - 6 = � Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat function of the site? H 2.1 Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: 30 % undisturbed habitat + ( 30 % moderate & low intensity land uses / 2) = 45% If total accessible habitat is: 3 > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20 - 33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10 - 19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 < 10 % of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: 10 % undisturbed habitat + ( 20 % moderate & low intensity land uses / 2) = 20% Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 2 Undisturbed habitat 10 - 50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10 - 50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3 Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (-2) -2 <_ 50% of 1km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above 3 Rating of Landscape Potential If Score is: 4-EN4-EN 1- 3 4M < 1= L EN Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 EMt has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) tat provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) [at is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species 1 [St is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources ©It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) with in 100m points = 1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above points = 0 Rating of value If Score is: El 1 EM 0 = LO Record the ratinq on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 9 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number Dimitriv FedWav WDFW Priority Habitats Priority habitats listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. http-./iwdfw.wa.gov/pubFications/001 65Iwdfw001 65.df or access the list from here: http: /Iwdfw,wa. g ov/co n se rvat i on /1) h s/ I i st/ Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. 0 Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). 0 Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). 0 Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. 0 Old-growth/Mature forests: Old -growth west of Cascade crest — Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests — Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158—see web link above). 0 Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. 0 Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161—see web link above). [� Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. 0 Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report — see web link on previous page). 0 Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. 0 Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. 0 Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. 0 Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 10 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number Dimitriv FedWay Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 11 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number Dimitriy FedWay CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. List the category when the appropriate criteria are met. SC 1.0. Estuarine Wetlands Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? 0 The dominant water regime is tidal, 0 Vegetated, and 0 With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt QYes - Go to SC 1.1 117,7111111 No = Not an estuarine wetland SC 1.1. Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? OYeS = Category I 0 NO - Go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2. Is the wetland unit at least 1 ac in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? 0 The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant species. (If non-native species are Spartina, see page 25) 0 At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un- grazed or un-mowed grassland. EN The wetland has at least two of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. ©Yes = Category I El NO = Category II SC 2.0. Wetlands of High Conservation Value (WHCV) SC 2.1. Has the WA Department of Natural Resources updated their website to include the list of Wetlands of High Conservation Value? Dyes - Go to SC 2.2 0 No - Go to SC 2.3 SC 2.2. Is the wetland listed on the WDNR database as a Wetland of High Conservation Value? DYes = Category I 0 No = Not WHCV SC 2.3. Is the wetland in a SectionfTownship/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? http://wwwl.dnr.wa.gov/nho/refdeskldatasearch/wnhpAetlands.pdf 0 Yes - Contact WNHP/WDNR and to SC 2.4 0 No = Not WHCV SC 2.4. Has WDNR identified the wetland within the S/T/R as a Wetland of High Conservation Value and listed it on their website? DYes = Category I NO = Not WHCV SC 3.0. Bogs Does the wetland (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below. If you answer YES you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. SC 3.1. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soil horizons, either peats or mucks, that compose 16 in or more of the first 32 in of the soil profile? DYes - Go to SC 3.3 [M No - Go to SC 3.2 SC 3.2. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks, that are less than 16 in deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on top of a lake or pond? Mes - GO to SC 3.3 0 No = Is not a bog SC 3.3. Does an area with peats or mucks have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND at least a 30% cover of plant species listed in Table 4? DYes = Is a Category I bog e3 NO - Go to SC 3.4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory, you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16 in deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the plant species in Table 4 are present, the wetland is a bog. SC 3.4. Is an area with peats or mucks forested (> 30% cover) with Sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Engelmann spruce, or western white pine, AND any of the species (or combination of species) listed in Table 4 provide more than 30% of the cover under the canopy? Yes = Is a Category I bog No = Is not a bog[ Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 12 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number Dimitriy FeclWay SC 4.0. Forested Wetlands Does the wetland have at least.1 contiguous acre of forest that meets one of these criteria for the WA Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer YES you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. [, Old -growth forests (west of Cascade crest): Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 in (81 cm) or more. Mature forests (west of the Cascade Crest): Stands where the largest trees are 80- 200 years old OR the species that make up the canopy have an average diameter (dbh) exceeding 21 in (53 cm). Yes = Category I El NO = Not a forested wetland for this section SC 5.0. Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? EM The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks 0 The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains ponded water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom) 0 Yes - Go to SC 5.1 0 NO = Not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1. Does the wetland meet all of the following three conditions? 0 The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of aggressive, opportunistic plant species (see list of species on p. 100). EN At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un- grazed or un-mowed grassland. 0 The wetland is larger than 1/lo ac (4350 ftz) Mes = category I C1 No = Category II SC 6.0. Interdunal Wetlands Is the wetland west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership Or WBUO)? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its habitat functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: EN Long Beach Peninsula: Lands west of SR 103 0 Grayland-Westport: Lands west of SR 105 0 Ocean Shores-Copalis: Lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 0 Yes - Go to SC 6.1 Em NO = Not an interdunal wetland for rating SC 6.1. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger and scores an 8 or 9 for the habitat functions on the form (rates H,H,H or H,H,M for the three aspects of function)? DYes = Category I 0 No - Go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is 1 ac or larger? ©Yes = Category II 0 No - Go to SC 6.3 SC 6.3. Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 ac, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 ac? DYes = Cate-zory III 0 NO = CateL-ory IV Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics If you answered No for all types, enter "Not A licable" on Summary Form Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 13 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Shablevskiy City/County: Federal Wav Sampling Date: 1/22120 19 Applicant/Owner: Shablevski State: WA Sampling Point: SP 1 W Investigator(s): M. HECKERT Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood NWI classification: PSSE Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: WETLAND A VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1 OM) °A Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Fraxinus latifolia 60 v FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 60 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B) SaDIinQlShrub Stratum (Plot size: 10 m ) 1. Spiraea doualasii 50 Y FACW Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total % Cover of: MultiDly by: 3. OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 4. FACW species 130 x 2 = 260 5. FAC species 0 x 3 = 0 50 = Total Cover FACU species 0 x 4 = 0 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10 m) UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 1. Ranunculus acris 20 v facw Column Totals: 130 (A) 260 (B) 2. 3, Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5, ® Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. ® Dominance Test is >50% 7, ® Prevalence Index is 53.0' g. ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ❑ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 20 Total Cover be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1 1. Hydrophytic 2 Vegetation = Total Cover Present? Yes ® No ❑ % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: distinct depression and boundary US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP 1 W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-10 10/vr3/2 100 10-18 10/yr2/2 100 loam sandy loam inundated at 10 inches 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ® Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ® Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ® Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except MLRA ❑ High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ® Water Marks (B1) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ® Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ® Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) ® Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ® Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 a more required) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 46) ® Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Surface Water Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 10 Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks: does meet wetland criteria US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Shab€evskiy CitylCounly: Federal Way_ Sampling Date:1122/2019 Applicant/Owner: Shablevskiv State: WA Sampling Point: SP 3W Investigator(s): M. HECKERT Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood NWI classification: PSSE Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑' Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes E No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes E No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes E No ❑ Remarks: WETLAND A VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1 OM) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Fraxinus latifolia 60 v FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 60 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: t0D% (A/B) SaplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size: 10 m ) 1. Populus tremuloides 30 Y FACW Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 4. FACW species 90 x 2 = 180 5. FAC species 0 x 3 = 0 30 = Total Cover FACU species 0 x 4 = 0 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10 m) UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 1 . 0 Column Totals: 90 (A) 180 (B) 2. 3. Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. E Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. E Dominance Test is >50% 7. E Prevalence Index is 53.0' 8, ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9 ❑ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 0 Total Cover be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1 1. Hydrophytic 2 Vegetation = Total Cover Present? Yes E No ❑ % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: distinct depression and boundary US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP 3W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist] % Color (moist) % Tvoe' LocZ Texture Remarks 0-10 10/vr3/2 100 10-18 10/yr2/2 100 loam sandy loam inundated at 6 inches 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lininq, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric SOIIS3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ® Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ® Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that aoDly) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ® Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except MLRA ❑ High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ® Water Marks (B1) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ® Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ® Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) ® Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ® Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ® Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) ❑ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Surface Water Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 6 Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: does meet wetland criteria US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast — Version 2.0 LANDAU ASSOCIATES June 5, 2019 City of Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Attn: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Associate Planner Transmitted via email to: Leila.Willoughby-Oakes@cityoffederalway.com Re: Proposal for Third -Party Review: Wetland Delineation and Buffer Mitigation Plan 354th Street Vicinity King County Parcel Nos. 302104-9007 and 302104-9079 Federal Way, Washington File No. 19-102396-UP (Shablevskiy Reasonable Use) Dear Leila: Landau Associates, Inc. (LAI) is pleased to submit this proposal for a peer review of the November 28, 2018 Wetland and Stream Evaluation and Delineation Review/Buffer Averaging Plan (Critical Areas Report), prepared by Beaver Creek Environmental Services, for King County parcels 302104-9007 and 302104-9079 (subject parcels). The Critical Areas Report identifies two wetlands on the subject parcels. This proposal was prepared in response to your May 20, 2019 communication, and is based on a brief review of the Consultant Authorization Form (attached) and on LAI's experience with similar projects. LAI will provide the services listed in the Consultant Authorization Form. Assumptions When preparing this scope of services and cost estimate, LAI made the following assumptions: ■ The City of Federal Way will coordinate necessary access permission for the subject parcels, and Shablevskiy (the applicant) will provide necessary access permission for offsite properties. ■ If needed, test pits will be hand excavated. Soil samples will be collected for comparison with the subsurface conditions noted in the Critical Areas Report. ■ Written responses to the Critical Areas Report and to the applicant's resubmittals/corrected documents will be formatted as technical memoranda. • LAI will provide a draft review of the Critical Areas Report for the City's review and comment. Upon receipt, comments will be addressed, and a final review will be issued. • A meeting with the applicant's biologist, if requested, will occur at the time of LAI's initial evaluation of the subject parcels. 130 2nd Avenue South • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • (425) 778-0907 • www.landauinc.com Third -Party Review/Shablevskiy Reasonable Use Landau Associates e LAI's scope of services does not include delineation of waterways or wetlands. Deliverables ■ Electronic (Adobe® PDF) copies of the draft and final technical memoranda. Cost Estimate Peer review services will be provided on a time -and -expense basis in accordance with the existing Professional Services Agreement for Third -Party Wetland/Stream Review and Evaluation (Amendment No. 3, signed July 18, 2018) between the City and LAI. The estimated cost for the services described is $7,755. LAI has budgeted $5,335 for review of the initial application materials and $2,420 for review of revised documents, if necessary (see attached table). If project requirements change, or out -of -scope services are necessitated, LAI will seek the City's approval to modify the scope of services and budget, as appropriate. LAI will not exceed its total estimated cost without authorization from the City. If the scope of services and cost estimate are acceptable, please provide written authorization to proceed. Closing LAI appreciates the opportunity to assist the City of Federal Way with this project. If you have questions or require additional information, please contact the undersigned at (425) 329-0321. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. Steven J. Quarterman Senior Associate SJQ/JAF/mcs 2019-7215 [X:\C_FEDERAL WAY\2019-06-SHABLEVSKIY PEER REVIEW\SHABLEVSKIY REASONABLE USE PROPOSAL FOR THIRD -PARTY REVIEW SERVICES.DOCX] Attachments: Cost Estimate Table Consultant Authorization Form June 5, 2019 Cost Estimate Table Page 1 of 1 Third -Party Review: Shablevskiy Reasonable Use Federal Way, Washington TASK Billing Rate: Senior Assoc $220 Proj Coord $110 Total Lbr Hrs Total Lbr$ Nonlbr Expenses Task Total 1. Peer Review 1.1 Review report/code 4 1 5 $990 $990 1.2 Field Review 8 8 $1,760 $55 $1,815 1.3 Draft/Final TM (Initial) 10 3 13 $2,530 $2,530 1.4 Draft/Final TM (Resubmittal) 10 2 12 $2,420 $2,420 Subtotal Task 1 TOTAL ALL TASKS 32 32 6 6 38 38 $7,700 1 $7,700 $55 55 $7,755 $7,755 12/O1/17 X:\C_Federal Way\2019-06_Shablevskiy Peer Review\Cost Estimate_tb_.XISX Landau Associates CITY OF Federal Way Date: WETLAND CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM May 20, 2019 City: City of Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Consultant: Steve Quarterman, Senior Ecologist Landau Associates s uarlermati(e?landavinc.cotn, 425-329-0321 Project: Shablevskiy Reasonable Use — Wetland Delineation and Buffer Mitigation Plan Property off of 3541b Street (unopened right-of-way) Parcels: 302104-9007 & 302104-9079 File No.: 19-102396-UP Project Tania Shablevskiy Proponent: 2940 5711, Avenue NE Tacoma, WA 98422 tat3iashahlevski cc.giiiaii.com, 253-249-8998 Project Planner: Associate Planner Leila Willoughby -Oakes lei la.willou5=hb-oakes@,cit offederaIwa .com, 253-835-2644 Project The applicant is interested in the development of the one site which is entirely Background: encumbered by a wetland buffer. They submitted a Reasonable Use request for the single-family lot and half -street improvements under Public Works Department requirements per Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.145.090. Documents . Wetland and Stream Evaluation & Delineation Review/Buffer Averaging Plan, Provided: prepared by Beaver Creek Environmental Services (report date: Nov. 28, 2018) • Partial Site Plan- Shablevskiy Residence, by Urbala, LLC (March 18, 2019) ESA, Kenny Properties Peer Review Memo (May 2016) • City Critical Areas Map, see next page (*map not updated since 2016 peer review) 19-102396-00-UP Doc. I.D. 79180 l i Task Scope: 1. Review the critical areas report for consistency with the requirements of FWRC Chapter 19.145, "Environmentally Critical Areas," especially Article IV, "Wetlands"; FWRC 19.145.140 "Mitigation Plan Requirements"; and FWRC 19.145.440 "Development Within Wetland Buffers." 2. Conduct site visit(s) as necessary. 3. Provide written response to findings, recommendations, and request additional information from applicant if needed. 4. Possible meeting with applicant's wetland biologist. 5. Review of resubmitted/corrected documents as needed. 6. Project management as necessary if additional land use review is required. Task Cost: Not to exceed $7,755 without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. Acceptance: June 5, 2019 Consultant 1 Date ) -- (0 0,4� 6li-t-LC. � City of Federal Way Staff Date Applicant 35M A _ M57 v X3s: r sue.. .2 ttheMng Fellowhip sl3o i6TH ST soon ass RS7.2J - F - _sz5 �n• 051 ssv iW7 33 INII BELLACAM 11 WrJIrIrS !1 ft38 n3-T airs RIO a MY V2i 827 it f<16 f rxa r' � r - tl Fit - 922 W,i sos RS9. Date 19-102396-00-UP Doc. LD 79180 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 81h Avenue South CITY OFF Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal Way253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffcdcralway.co ECEIVErE LCULATING TREE UNITS (IN RS ZONES) MAY 16 2019 CA CITY OF FEDERAL WAY (Chapter 19.120 Federal Way Revised Code) COMMUNrY DEVELOPMENT ■ To determine the minimum tree units required for your site: 43,560 (sf/acre) = 1 - 7 10 x 25 (units/acre) _ .T q (lot size in square feet) (lot size in acres) (minimum tree units) Example: Lot Size = 9,723 square feet 9,723143,560 = .22 acres .22 x 25 = 5.5 = 6 tree units ■ To determine number of existing or replacement tree units: Replacement Trees Evergreen Trees — minimum 6' in height at planting Deciduous Trees — minimum 2" caliper at planting Species Tree Units Small Canopy (mature canopy area <450 square feet) 0.5 Examples: Japanese Maple, Black Hawthorne, Western Crabapple Medium Canopy (mature canopy area 450 — 1,250 square feet) 1.0 Examples: Western White Pine, Choke Cherry, Honey Locust Large Canopy (mature canopy area > 1,250 square feet) 1.5 Examples: Douglas Fir, Tulip Tree, Western Red Cedar For a complete list of recommended replacement trees, see Bulletin #068 Bulletin #073 —January 1, 2011 Page I of 1 k:\Handouts\Calculating Tree Units Chris Selle, Certified Arborist (206)-387-8214 Email: soundtreeconsultin mail.com Certified Arborist PN#7030A Certified Tree Risk Assessor (TRAQ) December 16th, 2018 Vitaliy & Tatyana Shablevskiy 2940 57th Ave NE Tacoma, WA 98422 253-249-8998 / 206-687-0205 taniashablevskiy@gmail.com Hello Vitaliy and Tatyana, Here is the Arborist Identification Report that you requested for the trees located on the property at 92X SW 3541h St, Federal Way, 98023. All trees over 6" at 4.5' above grade were measured for DBH, physical drip line radius and the general condition of the tree is given. Notes: Below I have given some best practice protection measures for trees that you are retaining. All tree conditions are based on a level 1 (visual) assessment and these should not be considered a comprehensive risk assessment. Trees number seven, twelve, and twenty are in poor condition. This is related to a defect in the trees growth, although it appears these will likely be removed to accommodate housing. There are no trees of any particularly exceptional size or rarity on this report. Tree Identificatiyr. pert: Tree #1: 8" DBH Red Alder tree (Alnus rubra), fair condition, average physical drip line radius I Tree #2: 8" DBH Red Alder tree (Alnus rubra), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 10' Tree #3: 10" DBH Red Alder tree (Alnus rubra), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 13' Tree#4: 13" DBH Western Red Cedar tree (Thuja plicata), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 15' Tree#5: 15" DBH Douglas fir tree (Pseudotsuga menziesii), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 16' Tree#6: 14" DBH Western Red Cedar tree (Thuja plicata), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 13' Tree#7: 11" DBH Red Alder tree (Alnus rubra), poor condition, average physical drip line radius 10' Tree48: 14" DBH Red Alder tree (Alnus rubra), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 16' Tree#9: 16" DBH Western Red Cedar tree (Thuja plicata), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 17' Tree#10: 10" DBH'--N Alder tree (Alnus rubra), fair conditi") average physical drip line radius 12' Tree#11: 14" DBH Red Alder tree (Alnus rubra), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 13' Tree#12: 12" DBH Red Alder tree (Alnus rubra), poor condition, average physical drip line radius 12' Tree#13: 9" DBH Red Alder tree (Alnus rubra), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 10' Tree#14: 8" DBH Vine Maple tree (Acer circinatum), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 13' Tree# 15: 16" DBH Douglas fir tree (Pseudotsuga menziesii), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 16' Tree#16: 11" DBH Douglas fir tree (Pseudotsuga menziesii), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 12' Tree#17: 9" DBH Big Leaf Maple tree (Acer macrophyllum), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 10' Tree#18: 15" DBH Douglas fir tree (Pseudotsuga menziesii), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 14' Tree#19: 14" DBH Douglas fir tree (Pseudotsuga menziesii), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 15' Tree#20: 13" DBH' d Alder tree (Alnus rubra), poor condi� , average physical drip line radius I Tree#21: 14" DBH Douglas fir tree (Pseudotsuga menziesii), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 14' Tree#22: 15" DBH Douglas fir tree (Pseudotsuga menziesii), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 14' Tree#23: 13" DBH Douglas fir tree (Pseudotsuga menziesii), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 15' Tree#24: 11" DBH Douglas fir tree (Pseudotsuga menziesii), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 2l' Tree#25: 12" DBH Red Alder tree (Alnus rubra), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 13' Tree#26: 13" DBH Red Alder tree (Alnus rubra), fair condition, average physical drip line radius I P Tree#27: 14" DBH Red Alder tree (Alnus rubra), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 14' Tree#28: 13" DBH Big Leaf Maple tree (Acer macrophyllum), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 13' Tree#29: 14" DBH Red Alder tree (Alnus rubra), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 14' Tree#30: 10" DBH `r!1 Alder tree (Alnus rubra), fair conditV—)average physical drip line radius I F Tree#31: 11" DBH Red Alder tree (Alnus rubra), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 10' Tree#32: 9" DBH Western Red Cedar tree (Thuja plicata), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 13' Tree#33: 22.4" DBH Big Leaf Maple tree (Ater macrophyllum), fair condition, average physical drip line radius 19' Tree Protection Plan Guidelines The critical root zone (CRZ) is usually halfway into the outer drip line, toward the tree. The protection measures we are proposing will not adversely impact the CRZ of any of the trees we are protecting. The followin g1jidelines are recommended during eonstryclion: • Access is to be restricted into TPZ's with tall, bright protective fencing. • "Keep out" signs shall be posted on all sides of the TPZ fencing, and construction materials and equipment are not to be stored within TPZ. • Check the integrity of TPZ fences daily, and repair or replace as needed. • Wood chips or other mulch should be used to spread above root zones within the drip line at a depth of 8-10 inches for temporary protection from soil compaction. • If roots need to be pruned, they should be cut with pruning saws, made flush with the side of the trench and the root tips packed with mud to keep moist • Trees should be watered twice a week if construction is to take place during hot summer months. • Control soil moisture within the protected area. Prevent flooding of the soil, and protect root areas from leachate, cement, oil, fuel, and all other contaminants. • Do not store materials potentially hannful to tree roots within 20 feet of protected areas. These include, but are not limited to: petroleum products, cement and concrete • materials, cement a �ives, lime, paint coatings, waterproofi�gents, form coatings, detergents, acids, and cleaning agents. • Mycorrhizal treatments may be added to the soil to increase the tree root's ability to uptake water and nutrients, improving its chances of withstanding environmental stress Sources ANSI A300 (partl)-2008 American national Standards Institute. American National Standard for Tree Care Operations: Tree. Shrub, and Other Woody Plant Maintenance: Lilly, Sharon. Arborists' Certification StjLdy Guide: Champaign, IL: The International Society of Arboriculture, 2001. Matheny, Neida and James R. Clark. Trees and Development: A Technical Guide to Preservation of Trees During Land Development. Champaign, IL: International Society of Arboriculture, 1998 Methodolozy I evaluated the trees health using a visual tree assessment (VTA). This identifies any obvious signs of decay, disease, or possible failures. I measured the diameter (DBH) of the trees at 54" above grade. I used a pair of binoculars to inspect the upper crown of the trees Thank you Chris Selle Certification # PN 7030-A Certified Tree Risk Assessor 24440 Russell Rd apt 209 Kent, WA, 98032 (206)-387-8214 RECEIVED 6 1 Lakehaven W .. WATER & SEWER DISTRICT MAY 16 2019 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SEWER CERTIFICATE OF AVAILABILITY Lakehaven Water & Sewer District - Development Engineering Section 31623 - 1st Ave S * PO Box 4249 * Federal Way, WA 98063-4249 Telephone: 253-945-1581 or 253-945-1580 * Email: DE@Lakehaven.org This certificate is intended to provide the applicant, land use agencies &/or public health departments with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay, or deny, sewer service based upon capacity &/or supply limitations in Lakehaven's or Other Purveyor's system facilities. Proposed Land Use: ® Building Permit-SFR (1) ❑ Building Permit-MFR Q ❑ Building Permit -Other ❑ Subdivision () ❑ Short Subdivision () ❑ Binding Site Plan ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment ® Other (specify/describe) ,Process III AMMY-P-1 Tax Parcel Number(s): 3021049007 Site Address: 9XX SW 354th St Lakehaven GIs Grid: G-13 Ex. Bldg. Area to Remain: N/A sf New Bldg. Area Proposed: 3.000+/- sf SEWFR SYSTEM INFORMATION 1. ® Sewer service can be provided by service connection to an existing 8" diameter sewer main that is approximately 20+ - feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed land use. 2 ®if rnprovementf SW 354th roadway 15 r i e 1 h no i e of sub's nmnprtv, sewer service for the site will require an improvement to Lakehaven's sanitary sewer system of: ® a. 20+/- feet of 8" diameter sewer main or trunk to reach the site; and/or ❑ b. The construction of a sanitary sewer collection system on the site; and/or El c. A major portion of Lakehaven's comprehensive wastewater system plan would need to be implemented and/or constructed; and/or ® d. Other (describe): Dev Ex r nk r u' x e a Lakehaven policy. 3. ® a. The existing sewer system Is in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan. ❑ b. The existing sewer system Is not in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan and an Amendment to this Plan will be required. This may cause a delay In issuance of land use approvals or permits. 4. ® a. The proposed site land use Is within the corporate limits of Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of sewer service outside of Lakehaven's sewer service area. ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. S. Sewer service is subject to: ® a. Payment of connection charges (to be determined by Lakehaven); ❑ b. Proof or reservation of easement(s) as required by Lakehaven; ® c. Other: Sewer Seryice Conn ion Permit required. Comments/special conditions: Finisb floor ele at s less than one-foabove nearest ugWeam manhole a1 Y—in-di—ca-t9d, Backwater Check Valve potentially indicated antact In 1 bulldl ffici l r re uirements ar d i io Inf ion. I hereby certify that the above sewer system information is true. This certification shall be valid for one (1) year from the date of signature. Name: BRIAN ASBURY Title: DEVELOPMENT ENGIN ERING SUPERVISOR Signature: Date: dam- 9 6 ' 3021049007 swr.docx (Form Update 12/28118) Page 1 of 2 71DTE: laicehaven Water and Sewer Sewer C eltificate of A aia a ility District neither warrants nor s mrarrte-er Parcel 3021049007 the accuracy of any facility informaticn pravkfed. Facility Io atiarrs and cone iticn9 are 5uhlecttofieldwerifieation- E 2`26'2019 BIA 3021049007 swr.docx (Form Update 12/28/18) Page 2 of 2 Parcel number Taxpayer name Parcel address Jurisdiction Zip code Appraise Assess d value or's 1 0662310640 DUNN KEVEN E+KATHRYN M 857 SW 354TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 503000 Report 2 0662310650 CHA JOE 849 SW 354TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 495000 Report 3 0662310660 BAE AUGUSTINE C 841 SW 354TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 519000 Report 4 0662310670 YAGHOOBI DAVID 833 SW 354TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 485000 Report 5 0662310680 CHO DONG H 825 SW 354TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 503000 Report 6 0662310750 WOO TAI MING MICHAEL 35447 8TH AVE SW FEDERAL WAY 98023 494000 Report 7 0662310760 THOMAS MICHAEL J+KISHA 35455 8TH AVE SW FEDERAL WAY 98023 495000 Report 8 0662310770 BILODEAU THOMAS E+CANDY L 806 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 503000 Report g 0662310780 KIM KEITH Y 816 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 494000 Report 101 0662310790 KIENZLE GREGORY D+KIMBERLY 822 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 521000 Report Ill 0662310800 FLANIGAN EDWARD V 826 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 531000 Report 121 0662310810 CZUK MARY H+MITCHELL F 813 SW 354TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 514000 Report 131 0662310820 MEDANI LOUISA OBIOMA 830 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 481000 Report 14 0662310830 WOO JAE HWAN+HYUN JOO 834 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 497000 Report 15 0662310840 OH SUN M+OH NICOLE H+OH NAT 838 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 506000 Report 16 0662310850 PAK CHAEWOO+SUNGNAN 839 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 507000 Report 17 0662310860 GRIDLEY MICKEY+MICHELLE 835 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 495000 Report 18 0662310870 LEE CHANG KYOUNG+KUNL 831 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 495000 Report lqj 0662310880 CHOI CHRISTINE H+JOHN C 827 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 524000 Report 20 0662310890 BILYEU CAROLYN AND MATTHEW 823 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 497000 Report 211 0662310900 TRAN JAMES P+XUAN T NGUYEN 819 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 507000 Report 221 0662310910 PHAN MINH 815 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 494000 Report 231 0662310920 CALUGAY RUBEN S 811 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 506000 Report 241 0662310930 LE CHINH V 807 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 507000 Report 251 0662310940 LEE KIN 1 803 SW 355TH CT FEDERAL WAY 98023 493000 Report 404=-6 CHR�}iE KING BIBLE FELLO 35448 11TH AVE SW FEDERAL WAY 98023 1620300 Report 271 3021049007 Y SHABL-6VSKILTATYAIVA+ 2940 57th Ave NE Tacoma 98422 80000 Report 28 3021049076 SIME EMEBET+NESANET 922 SW 356TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 358000 Report 29 3021049078 ROBLEDO RAFAEL 930 SW 356TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 329000 Report n __3p21.049 9 SHABLEVSKIY T rfAl Al -SM 2940 57th Ave NE Tacoma 98422 67000 Report 31 3021049080 OWEN PATRICIA J H (TTEE) 926 SW 356TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 438000 Report 32 3021049081 OWEN PATRICIA J H (TTEE) 926 SW 356TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 75000 Report 331 3833000005 FEDERAL WAY CITY OF 33325 8th Ave S FEDERAL WAY 98003 Report ,341 3833000010 HUNT SAMUEL MATTHEWS 846 SW 354TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 546000 Report 35 3833000012 WALIMAA SANDRA J 852 SW 354TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 546000 Report 36 3833000015 LOONEY EDELTRAUD S+YEE PAME PO Box 1435 Tacoma 98401 9000 Report 37 4405600070 TANKERSLEY FAY L 1015 SW 356TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 337000 Report 38 4405600075 PRESBA DANIEL W 1001 SW 356TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 366000 Report 39 4405600080 RICHARDS DONALD T 931 SW 356TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 407000 Report 40 4405600085 BLUE ADRIAN D+SHAWNA M 925 SW 356TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 331000 Report 41 4405600090 STARR ALAN W+CAREN A 905 SW 356TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 248000 Report 42 4405600235 SHAY HARMON L+JAMIE M 820 SW 356TH ST FEDERAL WAY 98023 248000 Report 43 5028601850 NGUYEN BACH+LAN 35344 10TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY 98023 326000 Report 44 5028601860 NGUYEN LOC PHUOC+PHUNG HUYE 35348 10TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY 98023 324000 Report 45 5028601870 KOEFFLER JASON C+TESSA J 35352 10TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY 98023 402000 Report 46 5028601880 TOMUZ VIOREL+ANA GARAZ 35358 10TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY 98023 1 367000 Report RECEIVED MAY 16 2019 CITY OF FEDSPAL WAY MMMIJNrrY DEVELOPMENT King County Parcel Viewer 4 https://gismaps 1;in>-county.gov/parcelviewer2//?pin=3021049007 by: Address Search Find hjt,1section Zoom to Advanced tools Basemaps Remove buffer 51.27 7 :a 4r04935'0 4 6-m860 ?� 4. 1 y 3 a$x m.7asa ■7 J 3G8 f 7 �bL2 c a u ]4_1 2 .,3534 .3' 30 GCafo - �� 1 7_20•0.100 00 5 R�7❑ F 1305 r16 f.■} Q TR S �a. p 3�Dz30�L:i0 53 3 C�2i] � 1!7 �� Si 1.1■p au ,.' �2, 11► iI '^ 9��0■ Oin� a' �'� 0_223. 3�p22t] r 1t33 7�y .gg 3:411 &L! 335534 r2 g 3. log3' 3 55 - . fa_8 1:aSD 3 i:' O ■ 1- t, t ,+`] 8 2` `a 3 30'- 0 5 /-;� • � w- �2Q rr _ ,u�53 I:sQ� 0180 2 106 a 7i D"�0 0950 1 ix 0t� aL �s - IT, N 8 $ 15 L . 7o 70 .� v 1`p35 r @3 4 3 y �� +�;„ �: iF 1oii C `1� 00: s ��( 0■ ■ w a+�,t? gggd� 1 O 85 1 OIbO s t 1ggS Di3ti; e.i:• ' Uc,eg3g u15�42 239 c71i` LI4297 Opt 5 `926 r r # r� 1'S4{I 91, 6 nl h� 35�,3 3 0l 7• Into �35 .tfi e„ 't. 3✓y O v - �cs5 1 . Lr G j_ 1$ 1Qr 3 2 10 `93 {�92. r81 a- F8` 7 L o G?�8�0r 18 `35 13 4 !R a _ - ry .: fV N h l j 7 4 �553.1— �. a..3031 �1 G5 Od 5 0 5. 535 '�L _� ■ 612 ' p 2 �� 5617 �3� v�.■7 3 �'2 fir+ 0 817 F■mil" „ w aw 27 0.45SSx33d J. V e]!i` 5C18 r 1, r 356'34 3562 35b23 �35 31 S 1 ��320 00 i1 �35�62$ �� 1u0 !y l '�O gp 0. J7 0!:': O:..w �5626 gp ggr�6g39 yy56 35i07 �5627 5628 �35G 9 0{1tj ipo I 6 g�G4 0lh3 ClllS LU�7 rz? �fl� 0175 01�6 Ui 3lS �� 90_-,,3551f5 1■$ i !75 047 sere aKri7a 57I$ �5ry�n ,35C:45 n+i;52 RECEIVED MAY 16 2019 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNfTY DEVELOPMEN' 1 of 2 5/16/2019, 7:23 AM RECEIVED RETURN ADDRESS: City of Federal Way Attn: Kevin Peterson, Public Works Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 MAY 16 2019 Crry OF 111111111111111110111U ��; M 20190403000619 COVENANT Rae_ $108.00 4/312019 2:09 PM KING COUNTY, WA CITY OF FEDERAL WAY LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WAIVER OF PROTEST COVENANT Grantor(s): TATYANA AND VITALIY SHABLEVSKIY, a married couple Grantee(s): CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, a Washington municipal corporation Property Legal Description (abbreviated): A portion of the W 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Sec 30, TWP 21 N, R 4 E, W.M. Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): 302104-9007 S-T-R: 30-21-04 Permit No: 18-102857-PC THIS COVENANT is made by Tatyana and Vitaliy Shablevskiy ("Property Owners") in favor of the City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation ("City"). A. The Property Owner owns certain real property commonly known as 9xx SW 354th St, Federal Way, WA 98023 and legally described as follows: THE EAST 165 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEWST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 135 FEET OF THE SOUTH 235 FEET; ALSO EXCEPT SOUTHWEST 356TH STREET; ALSO EXCEPTH THAT PORTION CONVEYED IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8901170442. ("Property"). B. The Property Owner has submitted a request for Reasonable Use approval under Permit No. 18-102858- PC in order to construct a single-family house on the Property which abuts a substandard City right-of-way known as SW 354th St, which project will impact and derive special benefits from the public right-of-way. C. The City may, in the future, construct, reconstruct or improve SW 354th St to City standards including, but not limited to, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways across sidewalks, storm drains, retaining walls, street illumination, landscaping, slope protection, underground power, and necessary appurtenances consistent with good street construction ("Improvements"), so as to benefit the Property, through the formation of a Local Improvement District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Property Owner agrees as follows: 1. Permit. The Property Owner may obtain a Reasonable Use approval for construction of a single- family house without the installation of the Improvements across the entire property frontage, so long as all other conditions of the permit, if any, are complied with to the City's satisfaction. 2. No Protest. Pursuant to RCW 35.43.182 and in consideration of the City approving said permit, the Property Owner agrees to participate in and not protest the formation of a Local Improvement District pursuant to RCW 35.43.180. 1 Term. This Covenant shall be for a term of ten (10) years commencing on the date of execution hereof and terminating ten (10) years thereafter. 4. Improvements. Nothing in this Covenant shall in any way absolve the Property Owner of arty underlying obligation to make any public improvements as a condition of permit approval under any application other than Permit No. 1 8-102858-PC prior to the expiration date of this Covenant or upon eighty (80) days' written notice from the City if such public improvements are required pursuant to the Federal Way Revised Code, any other permit application, or other applicable laws, rules, or regulations, as now existing or hereafter adopted or amended. The Improvements may be necessary to mitigate the effects of the development of the Property. This Covenant shall be construed only as providing an alternative means for payment for necessary public improvements through the formation of a Local Improvement District. 5. Bindings. This Covenant shall be construed to touch and concern the land, shall run with the land, and bind the Property Owner, its successors in interest, heirs, and assigns. 6. Filing. This Covenant shall be recorded by the Property Owner with the King County Office of Records and the Property Owner shall pay all recording fees. 7: Limitation. Nothing in this Covenant shall be construed to waive the Property Owner's right to object to the Property Owner's individual assessment (including the determination of special benefits allocable to the Property), or to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Federal Way City Council affirming the final assessment roll. DATED this 'J day of 20 Signature pages follow PROPERTY OWNER: Tatyana SiralAevskiy 35310 25TH Ave SW Federal Way, WA 98023 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me, Tatyana Shahlevskiy, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and on oath swore that she executed the foregoing instrument as her free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN my hand and official seal this / �tday of /4t2YC 20 Notary's signature ��`••`*�G� ]' '•.,�+� Notary's printed name O-K T VeOV • ...... ii • Notary Public in and for the State,of W gton. �% . �•; - My commission expires .p� . Az - �• •'•r`r•••��fe,lllltiil•' �y `'``` PROPERTY OWNER Vitaliy Shablevskiy 35310 25TH Ave SW Federal Way, WA 98023 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me, Vitaliy 5lzablevs_kiy, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and on oath swore that he executed the foregoing instrument as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. / 9 day ' V` O--'*-e 4 20 GIVEN my hand and official seal this of .1 tia",,, u, n+ r rri KART',,, Notary's signature Notary's printed name .`+•to.••�� on 4 Notary Public in and for the Stat My of W hington. 2 g rZO Z 3 commission expires + •f "Pot �W,AS"`'`�� Rev. 05/17 CITY OF Federal Way Centered on Opportunity February 19, 2019 Tatyana Shablevskiy 35310 25TH Ave SW Federal Way, WA 98023 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor RE Permit #19-100218-00-SM; Shablevskiy Reasonable Use — Response to Request to Waive Street Improvements. Parcel #3021049007 Dear Mrs. Shablevskiy, This letter responds to your request to modify the required street improvements along SW 354th St, which abuts the above -referenced property, as part of your request for reasonable use of the property to develop one single-family residence. After evaluating the conditions of the constructed sections of SW 354th Street, review of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) provisions (Sections 19.135.070 and 19.135.090) and direction provided by the City Council, the Public Works Department hereby denies your request, as noted below. SW 354th Street is classified as a Local Street, corresponding to Federal Way Roadway Section `W', which requires a 28-foot paved roadway with curb and gutter, a 4-foot planter strip, 5400t sidewalk, and 3-foot utility strip within a 52-foot right of way. The existing right of way that fronts this parcel is currently unimproved. Immediately to the east of this unimproved right of way is a `temporary' cul-de-sac that is the westerly end of the unproved section of SW 354th St, developed as part of the plat of Bellacarino Woods Div. H. The majority of this improved section of SW 354th St was designed under King County standards, with a 24-foot roadway with curb and gutter, a 5-foot planter strip, and a 5-foot sidewalk within a 48-foot right of way. The unimproved right of way also aligns to the west with another, improved, dead-end section of SW 354th St. It's clear that with the alignment of both the improved and unimproved sections of this right of way, SW 354th St is planned as a through street. As a condition of development of the property, you will be required to construct `half -street' improvements along your property frontage. The half -street improvements shall be a 20-foot paved roadway, curb and gutter, 4-foot planter strip with street trees, and 5-foot concrete sidewalk. The improvements will be required to extend from the end of the cul-de-sac across that portion of your property, a distance sufficient enough to allow for installation of a City standard driveway approach that will align with your on -site driveway (which shall meet all City code require side yard setback requirements), plus an. additional 5-feet to the west or the approach, titi, order to transition .back to .a sidewalk, planter, and curb and gutter section. \\CFWFILEI\Applications\CS[]r.P! c)b•:;ocs\save\1558t5 78700_29083757;DOC You will also be required to execute and record the enclosed `Local Improvement District (L.I.D.) Waiver of Protest Covenant'. The conditions of this right-of-way modification will be applicable for a period of one year. If reasonable use approval is not issued within the one year time period, this waiver will be void, and a new request for modification must be submitted. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer, at (253) 835-2734. Sin Ly, --- Desire6 Winkler, P.E. Deputy Public Works Director DW:KP/ss Enclosure: City Standard Residential Driveway Detail 3-6 Local Improvement District (L.I.D.) Waiver of Protest Covenant c: Kasm Saber, HellselI Fetterman, LLP, 1001 Fourth Ave, Suite 4200, Seattle, WA 98154-1154 Project file (kp) Day file gCFWFTLEI\Applications\CSDOPROD\docs\save\I55915_78700 29083757.AOC c a °CiTR 110 46 * -0 o C Ui 0 m CA v z a 0 Z v C m 0 v Z v w � z 0 n .R701 Ul A fw N C Z' Z m' 0 In Z_I A m m rn " m r TMz N x z m Z� n r� o M. m o tocn m m Z� O g OM w vt Z �m Dz O 7 m O � oD v ma m >0 a az mO j pN Z47 M in A m O v � F,0 0 rO� o N m c� m �m s m I z `o ■1 0 > rz rrn �a z z 0 c Z Am mm �o c� Z m m 01;o O m r. m v ., z z w ` First American First American Title Insurance Company 920 5th Avenue, Suite 1250 Seattle, WA 98104 RECEIVED May 11, 2019 Tatyana and Vitaliy Shablevskiy 2940 57th Ave NE Tacoma, WA 98422 Phone: (253)249-8998 Fax: Title Officer: Phone: Fax No.: E-Mail: Order Number: Escrow Number: Buyer: Owner: Property: Pat Fullerton (206)615-3055 (866)904-2177 TitleKingWa@firstam.com 3239713 3239713 Shablevskiy Vacant Land Federal Way, Washington 98023 Attached please find the following item(s): Guarantee MAY 16 2019 CITY OF FEDERAL . . COMMUNITY DEIIELUPMEN'I Thank You for your confidence and support. We at First American Title Insurance Company maintain the fundamental principle: Customer First. Faun 5003353 (7-1-14) tPage 1 of 9 Guarantee Number: 3239713 CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Washington First American NOW ,, `4� Guarantee Subdivision Guarantee ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company GUARANTEE NUMBER ,5003353-3239713 SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE LIMITS OF LIABILITY AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF THIS GUARANTEE, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a Nebraska corporation, herein called the Company GUARANTEES Tatyana and Vitaliy Shablevskiy the Assured named in Schedule A against actual monetary loss or damage not exceeding the liability stated in Schedule A, which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness In the assurances set forth in Schedule A. First ► merican Title Insurance Canrpany Donnis J Gilmore PresiffEnt ;#"10, fio-4�� 1ePlrey S. Robinson Secretary 5003353 (7-1-14) 2 of 9 This jacket was created electronically and constitutes an original document Number: 3239713 I— CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) 6 Washington 1. 2. 1. 2. 3. OF SCHEDUL EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS ARANTEE Except to the extent that specific assurances are provided in (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the lines of the land Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: expressly described in the description set forth in Schedule (A), (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters against the title, whether or not shown by the (C) or In Part 2 of this Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such land abuts, public records. or the right to maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps or any (b) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that structure or improvements; or any rights or easements therein, levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether specifically set forth in said description. (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, or not the matters excluded under (1) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the public whether or not shown by the public records; (1) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the records. Assureds; (2) which result in no loss to the Assured; or (3) (c) (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions In patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance which do not result in the invalidity or potential invalidity of any judicial or non judicial proceeding which is within the scope thereof; (3) water rights, claims or tide to water, whether or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. shown by the public records. (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided in referred to in this Guarantee. Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS Definition of Terms. 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (a) the "Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as Assured in this Guarantee, or on a supplemental writing set forth in Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sole option and cost, executed by the Company. (b) "land": the land described or referred to in Schedule to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, interpose a (A)(C) or in Part 2, and improvements affixed thereto "land" defense, as limited in (b), or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to which by law constitute real property. The term does not include any property beyond the lines of the the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien area described or referred to in Schedule (A)(C) or in rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage Part 2, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not it shall be waterways. liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or (c) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. other security instrument. (d) "public records": records established under state (b) If the Company elects to exercise its options as stated in statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real Paragraph 4(a) the Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of such Assured to property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. "date": object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, (e) the effective date. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant. nor will the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or estate or interest, as stated herein, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to from an adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or any Assured unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the Company the right failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of such Assured for this action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding. 5003353 (7-1-14) [Page 3 of 9 NUmDer:.jz iv / i3 CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75). Washington GUAKP%NTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS (Cominued) S. 6. reasonable aid in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. Proof of Loss or Damage. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral security, to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any claim assured against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company Is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided For in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosection of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a) the amount of liability stated in Schedule A or in Part 2; (b) the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together with interest thereon; or (c) the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or Interest subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance assured against by this Guarantee. S. Limitation of Liability. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other matter assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by 5003353 (7-1-14) JPage 4 of 9 Number: 3239 /13 CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Washington GUM ..,NTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS (Co..iinued) 9. 10. 31. any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (b) In the event of any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability For loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as stated herein. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. Reduction of Liability or Termination of Liability. All payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. Payment of Loss. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely Fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within thirty (30) days thereafter. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been issued. If requested by the Company, the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall be 9Lbrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured shall have recovered its principal, interest, and costs of collection. Form 5003353 (7-1-14) JPage 5 of 9 12. Arbitration. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Land Title Association. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Liability is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbitrable matters when the amount of liability is in excess of $2,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Elate of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land Is located permits a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 13. Liability Limited to This Guarantee; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14. Notices, Where Sent. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to the Company at First American Title Insurance Company, Attn: Claims National Intake Center, 1 First American Way, Santa Ana, California 92707 Claims.NIC firstam.com Phone: 888-632- 1642 Fax: 877-804-7606 eQ1 3. First American Title Number: 3239113 CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Washington Subdivision Guarantee �t Am- eriean Schedule A Order No.: 3239713 ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company GUARANTEE NUMBER 3239713 Liability: $2,000.00 Fee: $350.00 Tax: $35.35 Name of Assured: Tatyana and Vital' Shablevskiy Date of Guarantee: May 02, 20, The assurances referred to on the face page hereof are: Title is vested in: TATYANA SHABLEVSKIY AND VITALIY SHABLEVSKIY, A MARRIED COUPLE That, according to the public records relative to the land described in Schedule C attached hereto (including those records maintained and indexed by name), there are no other documents affecting title to said land or any portion thereof, other than those shown under Record Matters in Schedule B. 3. The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this Guarantee A. Unpatented Mining Claims, reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof. B. Water rights, claims or title to water. C. Tax Deeds to the State of Washington. D. Documents pertaining to mineral estates. 4. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown herein. 5. This Guarantee is restricted to the use of the Assured for the purpose of providing title evidence as may be required when subdividing land pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 58.17, R.C.W., and the local regulations and ordinances adopted pursuant to said statute. It is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction affecting title to said property. 6. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment, guarantee or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. CI..TA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4Washington orm 5003353 (7-1-14) Page 6 of 9 Guarantee Number: 3239713 — Subdivision Guarantee rst American r Schedule B ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company GUARANTEE NUMBER 3239713 RECORD MATTERS 1. General Taxes for the year 2019. The first half becomes delinquent after April 30th. The second half becomes delinquent after October 31st. Tax Account No.: 302104900709 1st Half Amount Billed: $ 452.71 Amount Paid: $ 452.71 Amount Due: $ 0.00 Assessed Land Value: $ 80,000.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 2nd Half Amount Billed: $ 452.70 Amount Paid: $ 0.00 Amount Due: $ 452.70 Assessed Land Value: $ 80,000.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 2. Taxes which may be assessed and extended on any subsequent roll for the tax year 2019, with respect to new improvements and the first occupancy which may be included on the regular assessment roll and which are an accruing lien not yet due or payable. 3. Facility Charges, if any, including but not limited to hook-up, or connection charges and latecomer charges for sewer, water and public facilities of Water District No. 124 as disclosed by instrument recorded under recording no. 8106010916. 4. Facility Charges, if any, including but not limited to hook-up, or connection charges and latecomer charges for sewer, water and public facilities of Lakehaven Utility District as disclosed by instrument recorded under recording no. 9612311912. 5. Warrant in favor of the State of Washington. Against: Amount: Filed: Judgment/Warrant No. Case/Cause No.: Department: Vitally Shablevskiy et al $4,644.89, plus interest September 14, 2011 11-9-27899-4 11-2-31547-9 WA State of Revenue =orm 5003353 (7-1-14) Page 7 of 9 GUa:-antee Number: 3239713 CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Washington 6. Warrant in favor of the ZILate of Washington. Against: Vitaliy Shablevskiy et al Amount: $987.23, plus interest Filed: October 12, 2011 Judgment/Warrant No.: 11-9-31772-8 Case/Cause No.: 11-2-35388-5 Department: Washington State of Revenue 7. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises as granted by deed recorded January 17, 1989 under recording no. 8901170442. B. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: 8901170443 In Favor of: King County For: Slopes, cuts and fills 9. Conditions, notes, easements, provisions and/or encroachments contained or delineated on the face of the Survey recorded under Recording No. 9211129004. 10. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "City of Federal Way Local Improvement District Waiver of Protest Covenant" Recorded: April 03, 2019 Recording No.: 20190403000619 11. We don't find any voluntary liens of record affecting subject property. Inquire as to the existence of any unrecorded lien or other indebtedness which could give rise to any security interest in the subject property. Informational Notes, if any IF= 5003353 (7-1-14) fPage 8 of 9 Guarantee Number: 3239713 — CLTA r A Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75} 1 Washington Subdivision Guarantee t American Schedule C ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company GUARANTEE NUMBER 3239713 The land in the County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: THE EAST 165 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 135 FEET OF THE SOUTH 235 FEET; ALSO EXCEPT SOUTHWEST 356TH STREET; ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8901170442. Form 5003353 (7-1-14) 1 Number: 3239/13 CLTA #14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75)' Washington RMENVED tikja� a11,10-111 " 2g4b 57tl due e MAY 16 2019 p q gq? Z . OF FEDERAL WAY _ - M�I�IIDr�.�Y� 6149 ebl) 1/1 .,1 L+e� -Fo tilo / k��AAv !1v a�recc N b tdur nWArdaQ, s CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: 5-20-19 TO: Kevin Peterson, Development Services Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Planning FOR DRC MTG. ON: June 6, 2019 - Completeness Review (6-13) FILE NUMBER(s): 19-102396-00-UP RELATED FILE NOS.: 18-102858-PC PROJECT NAME: SHABLEVSKIY -REPsSONAB PROJECT ADDRESS: XXX SW 334th St. (Parcel# 3021049007) ZONING DISTRICT: RS 7.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reasonable use exemption application. LAND USE PERMITS: Process III `Project Approval' PROJECT CONTACT: Vitaly & Tatyana Shablevskiy 2940 571h Ave NE Tacoma, WA 98422 Taniashablevskiy@gmail.com MATERIALS SUBMITTED. Site Photos Site Plan Critical Area Report MLU Application Reasonable Use Narrative Water/Sewer Certs. Title Report No prelim. TIR) L - ji r•- ii f'-' L 1 MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ---_ 33325 8Lh Avenue South CITY OF _ Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal Way Cliff OF FEDERAL 1V,q� 253-835-2607; Fax dcralw5-2609 rtyaf'federal.�•ayr.�om APPLICATION NO(S) - I�f y Date f Project Name Property Addr( Parcel Number(s) V DD Project DescriptioN (A) VZ a �SE t rV W l L'F-sS L 135 n Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process I1(Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information Zoning Designation 5F Comprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Ai I LA Occupancy Type -Construction Type S C- Cc) Applicant Name: d,�1G( Lsi l� b1� V.1 1 Address: Z b 7 V F City/State: -g;R&tKjr Yk, —rAcv I S g I Z Phone: ZCJ _ Z9 9 " Fax: cD vvt . Email: Signature: Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner rr-- �''^ Name: �.NGi� [s Ylb (,evrs Address: 2 � tj t1A y A-) E `r City/State: �C`.C7�VLC+-1 �2,4Z2— Zip Phone: 2�3 — 24q -- 231 1 6 Fax: Email: �,Vl, SI Yfi .1J' itV S I-1 � ma;, CO VIA Signature: -- --- i) Bulletin #003 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Appli.::,tia', SITE ADDRESS: 8XX SW 354TH ST FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 PROJECT DATA: ZONE: RS7.2 PARCEL #3021049007 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: E 165 FT OF W 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS E 135 FT OF S 235 FT LESS CO RD LOT COVERAGE: LOT AREA: 76,666-SF BUILDING COVERAGE - 1,560-SF COVER PORCH 360-SF DRIVEWAY: 13-SFF �) TOTAL COVERAGEOV�3E:S LOT AREA : 76,666-�F - 14953-SF I 61,713-SF (NONE WETLAND AREA) SF RESIDENTIAL ZON(25 TREE UNi /A CE) Z66/43500 = 1.7 (25 TREE) = 4 T EE UNITS REQ'S m ULAU r.IN 5. ! ILT FENCE\; PROVIDE 10' X 4' CONST. ENTRY PER CITY STANDARD is nr i I �• "� Snwa FILTER FENCE DE BOLLS. FABRIC AHIRE TERIAL 60" 1TO USEESSTAPLES ORRINGS ATTACH FABRIC TO HIRE MIRAFI 70OX OR PRE -APPROVED EQUAL -METAL FENCE POSTS 2" X 2" X 149. HIRE FABRIC OR EOUIV. (OPTIONAL -PER SITE CONDITION) RY BOTTOM OF FILTER u W ;�fp "" MATERIAL IN 8" X 12' TRENCH I I II 6'-0• II MAXIMUM I I u I Iu I II II , FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL BACKFlLL KITH NATIVE SOIL a - MATERIAL OR GRAVEL BACKFILL IN TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF FENCE FABRIC ON THE SURFACE M. ANGLE SILT FENCE BACK UP THE SLOPE AT THE END OF RUN. SYMBOL: e e— e O PRESERVING VEGETATION VEGETATION AND TREE FENCING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4 HIGH ORANGE POLYETHYLENE LAMINAR SAFETY NETTING CANOPY DRIP LINE NOTES: s'r i. 3-INCH WOOD CHIP MULCH MAY BE ADDED FOR ROOT PROTECTION HITHIN FENCED AREA. 2. OUTSIDE OFPROTECTIVE FENCING AREA, PROTECT ROOTS 2-INCHES OR LARGER IN DIAMETER BY USING HAND EXCAVATION TECHNIQUES. 3. MINIMIZE CONSTRUCTION ZONE PROTECT I I VEGETATION OUTSIDE CONSTRUCTION ZONE I PROTECTED ROOT ZONE WITHIN THE I BY SEGREGATING IT NTH HIGH VISIBILITY CANOPY DRIP LNE-ACTUAL FEEDER CONSTRUCTION FENCING. ROOTS EXTEND WELL BEYOND DRIP LINE TREE PROTECTION IRWRA' �' �••� N.T.S. i ® ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE UNDERGROUND SEWER MAIN O SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT Q STORM DRAIN MANHOLE ® STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN UNDERGROUND STORM MAIN 0 STORM DRAIN YARD DRAIN EX. CULVERT FIRE HYDRANT ® WATER METER WATER VALVE WATER MAIN PAINTMARKS a GAS METER GAS VALVE GAS MAIN—PAINTMARKS ® POWER METER 0 CABLE TV RISER E— UTILITY POLE ANCHOR -o- UTILITY POLE UTILITY POLE AND TRANSFORMER POWER POLE WITH DROP&LIGHT UNDERGROUND POWER PAINTMARKS —OP— OVERHEAD POWER —OT— OVERHEAD TELEPHONE/CABLE EXISTING SIGN ❑ TELEPHONE RISER EXCAVATING PLAN: CLEARING LIMIT AREA: 3324-SF EXCAVATING AREA: 290-CUBIC FEET TREE SHALL BE REMOVE 0A/3\®0©8® 6' WOOD FENCE 160-TT-3P BLOCKS••' _ — — — — — — — -• — _ — -• — — — — — — _ — — — .� 3ON33 DOOM ,9 Ri ii I.wo"v`ro vwTar � i � y, ��LAGNUM �444!!l,WWV/ 6 TREES SHALL K REMOVE C-'1 M QD TREE PROTECTION S T PER CITY STANDARD M o MAIL BOX o GATE POLE 0 CHAIN LINK FENCE (CLF) ❑ WOOD FENCE (WDF) WIRE FENCE (WF) PAVEMENT GRAVEL CONCRETE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 10 DECIDUOUS TREE 0 SHRUBS AU FIR TREE CEDAR TREE MAPLE TREE 145 END :� .`.•�SP1W � A30 LAGN _-ASH SPIRA - SP-24 •GTltltlil.`�.ta-faAGNU i �FLAGNUM �.`.`.�CAGNUM* ' \ I Ai __ -.- __ __ �'T�� i\ .'..• •A3�r -.. . ��1 •tom �s- B NUM i ••`••�•. �..�..�•• { \ • • • • • • • ` • • ` • W • /B_:ri PINK . W . �•• �•�..�• tl \ _ A2' 1(LGNIAGNUM STn•r �-n T O _`• `.`.`.`.`.`.`.`..`.`.`.`.`.`.` "-LL` B-1 PINK, �i'" M r. ` es'-6' . �• ./• SP 3 PINK \�� `y•y13� Lfi'��on�1�., • FLAGNUM ('- . �i `.•. ...`.`.`.`.•..`.`..•.`..`.`.`.`.•. "y %• IRON POST (31 p� IRON I ••\ -•� �°� .. . ` • „ � . _ . � POST 60I MAGNUM DP-1 I 112'-6" I. N ST '. DP81 ( c I0 -0 ° SGSLE I" DATE REVISION REV. BY: PREPARED UT: DESIGNS * ENGINEERS * BUILDS 3350513th Place S, suite A Federal Way, WA 98003 5-7-873 Web: www.urbandePhone:velopment com, Ph. 253-835-1516 PREPARED FOR: SHABLEVSKIY RESIDENCE CUSTOMDESIGN 8XX SW 354TH ST FEDERAL WAY. WA 98023 PAYMENT OF USES FEE IS DUE TO URBALA DEVELOPMENT, E B PRIOR CONSTRUCTION FOR EACH STRUCTURE BUILT FROM 7HE5E6 PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL STATUTES. REPRODUCTION BY ANY METHOD � ALL OR PORTIONS OF THESE PLANS OR VARIATIONS THEREOF WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM URBALA DEVELOPMENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. THESE DRAWIW_36 AND PLANS SET FORTH ON THIS SHEET AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE ARE, AND SHALL REMAIN TO THE PROPERTY OF URBALA DEVELOPMENT, LLC. JY: B.T. 4/25/2019 REVISION KHAI REVISED TO ADD WETLAND GATE: 03/18/19 QHECKED: BT 11/5/19 REVISION BEN REVISED TO ADD WETLAND CORREC110N SHEET # �0�0 2 1 PROJECT # 18=68AE 02/18/20 REVISION BEN CORRECTION #3 RESUBMITTED FEB 18 2020 Cmr OF FEDEM WAY Milt COMy DEVELOPM PROTECTION SILT FENCIN CITY STANDARD IN \ O AREA 6' WOOD FENCE 150-FT SOH BLOCKS 6 TREES SHALL BE REMOVE !j 4i c3 DSO NOTE: \Sy / BUILD A FENCE TO �� PROTECT NON- C'� DISTURBANCE AREA \ DURING CONSTRUCTION TIME DATE REVISION REV. BY: P 4/25/2019 REVISION KHAI REVISED TO ADD WETLAND 11/5/19 REVISION BEN REVISED TO ADD WETLAND CORRECTION 02/18/20 REVISION BEN CORRECTION #3 REPARED BY \ C� S -r i A r,\ rl\ m r- - C _ X SW 35 TH ST FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 A5 END PROJECT DATA: ZONE: RS7.2 PERMANENT VISIBLE PARCEL #3021049007 y y � .lr y �,, MONUMENTS W W W LEGAL DESCRIPTION: y v E 165 FT OF W 1 /2 OF SE 1 /4 OF NE 1 /4 OF NW 1 /4 LESS E 135 FT OF y , S 235 FT LESS CO RD .LI 'L/ �' �1 LOT COVERAGE: A 3 O v LOT AREA: 76,666—SF BUILDING COVERAGE = 1 ,560—SF COVER PORCH COVERAGE: — 360—SF DRIVEWAY: 513—SF PERMANENT �Y �I. .I. .� �, �, y �, v, � � � TOTAL COVERAGE: 2,433—SF VISIBLE MONUMENTS y LOT AREA : 76,666—SF — 14 TREE UNIT CALCULATION (FWRC 19.120.130) SF RESIDENTIAL ZONES (25 TREE UNITS/ARCE) 76,666/43500 = 1.76 (25 TREE) = 44 TREE UNITS REQ'S .ii Ji .L y Ji LEGEND: STOCK PILE ------------------- J U TOPSOIL, SEEDING, MULCHED-------- CONSTRUCTIONENTRY ------------- Ji SILT FENCE-------------- - CLEARING LIMITS -------- v DRAINAGE DIRECTION---------/\/-� 2"-4" DECIDUOUS TREE--------------- v J I Y q, V 2"-4" EVERGREEN TREE-------------- \I' \I' q, \I/ _ \1/ \V \I/ y \I/ EXCAVATING PLAN CLEARING LIMIT AREA: 3324-SF 141 EXCAVATING AREA: 290-CUBIC FEET TREE SHALL BE REMOVE y y \1/ \1/ \1/ y \P 1 a FRB111 I tic DESIGNS * ENGINEERS * BUILDS 3350513th Place S, Suite A Federal Way, WA 98003 Phone: 253-517-8773 Web: www.urbandevelopment.com, Ph. 253-835-1516 PREPARED SHABLEVSKIY RESIDENCE CUSTOM DESIGN 8AvAv SW 354TH ST FEDERAL WAY. WA 98023 MZ 33 1100, BY: B.T. DATE: 03/ 18/ 1 CHECKED: BT PROJECT # b E I 9 EXCAVATING PLAN: CLEARING LIMIT AREA: 3324—SF EXCAVATING AREA: 290—CUBIC FEET TREE SHALL BE REMOVE LEGEND ❑O GAS METER GAS VALVE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE GAS MAIN-PAINTMARKS UNDERGROUND SEWER MAIN ® POWER METER O SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT 0 CABLE TV RISER QO STORM DRAIN MANHOLE E-- UTILITY POLE ANCHOR ® STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN -p- UTILITY POLE UNDERGROUND STORM MAIN UTILITY POLE AND TRANSFORMER 0 STORM DRAIN YARD DRAIN � POWER POLE WITH DROP&LIGHT EX. CULVERT -'- -� UNDERGROUND POWER PAINTMARKS FIRE HYDRANT OP— OVERHEAD POWER ® WATER METER —0T— OVERHEAD TELEPHONE/CABLE WATER VALVE -❑' EXISTING SIGN WATER MAIN PAINTMARKS TELEPHONE RISER ro 6' WOOD FENCE isD=Er'3P . nLocTcs �'�\ �7{G NI ,.. A-18 a� �,FLAGNUM FLAGNUM A4 (AUnD A5 END r "•�LL� RCTECTION Stu iENCRiG I . ••� A-20FLAGNUM �SP1 VU 1 4wPJaK. E. A 30 wl . . :� 1' . ` . ` .k`LAGTIt .WASH SPIRA - T-�sP-24 DPGP�`.11. ,. r V F.-'�:eFp AGNU 18 56 1T• , 1 . . . . . . . . . FLAGNUM s"As� GNUM RE I�O�RR I� . W . w. r. w. w wr www. r.+. . .. `. � • 4.4.W rw. .W. w • w � C ICAL AREA SWN on FRY 9UiTER q ti 6 TES SIULL . ... . . .. . . . . w w . ... f . �� . . w . . . — .—s.—••T� - -:DE REMOVE . . . . . . 'y .� . • . r . . .1 B_1 �r . y . . w r . . . . w . �0AGNUM rw6�T2F. ' A-23 A3 .. . .. . . w . .. . .. . . K x.. a .W.W.W. . . .A3Ym i' .W.P • L W Ne I°� ° \FL:AGNUM-. . . . . . . z . y� /` . . . . G Ba NUM �•f. .` . . ` . . + w .. . . . . . . . �B-L` PINK . . . . .. Z9 -. - - -- 64.-r-... ..w., .- - _ • _ �aNUM .W_'w`.`. ." WA2' .: 6_MAGNUM .. ....'.'.. . . .w. .W ��`� C�� 8-1 PINK • �" * M 1 iw ` ro.m...: •.•. ..•..+ . . . . . . �. B-18 CON2WA . 1 iTNCE® Mi�^10 .901EQ _ • . .. . LL . . ... + . . .. . • t` .� II� '\ - V •�� .,,, _ _ •,I IRON POST R ky� 30N33 DOOM ,9 TEA✓' MBo MAIL BOX o GATE POLE o CHAIN LINK FENCE (CLF) o WOOD FENCE (WDF) WIRE FENCE (WF) PAVEMENT GRAVEL t CONCRETE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DECIDUOUS TREE SHRUBS FIR TREE CEDAR TREE O MAPLE TREE '77 A3�•.W 1 ;: U) D P - 3 ` � � . .. w . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . "�� . W � • IRON POST � ( ?— 1 SP 3U PINK �FLAGNUM SAOorw ----�--- -��-----.--.�1.-- -- -- -- -- -- :�=-- -- - - - -- -- -- -- -- - --- -- -- - ` "If., 6• FLAGNUM DP-1 u�ITsT \ DP- \ \ DATE REVISION REV. BY: 4/25/2019 REVISION KHAI REVISED TO ADD WETLAND 11/5/19 REVISION BEN REVISED TO ADD WETLAND CORRECTION ----------------- -0- 1 SITE ADDRESS: 8XX SW 354TH ST FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 PROJECT DATA: ZONE: RS7.2 PARCEL #3021049007 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: E 165 FT OF W 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS E 135 FT OF S 235 FT LESS CO RD LOT COVERAGE: LOT AREA: 76,666—SF BUILDING COVERAGE = 1,560—SF COVER PORCH COVERAGE: = 360—SF DRIVEWAY: 513—SF TOTAL COVERAGE: 2,433—SF LOT AREA : 76,666—SF — 14953—SF = 61,713—SF (NONE WETLAND AREA) TREE UNIT CALCULATION (FWRC 19.120.130): SF RESIDENTIAL ZONES (25 TREE UNITS/ARCE) 66/43500 = 1.7-6 (25 TREE) = 44 TREE UNITS REWS STOCK PILE______________ TOPSOIL, SEEDING. MULCHED----- -- CONSTRUCTION ENTRY_____________ SILT FENCE______________ O O CLEARING LIMITS--------- - DRAINAGE DIRECTION -------- 2' 4" DECIDUOUS TREE---------------- YY 2•-4• EVERGREEN TREE ______________-"IIII�� FIL4RECE FABRIC DE BOLLS. TERIAL 60" PTO ULTER SE STAPLES ORAWIRE RINGS ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE MIRAfI 700X OR PRE -APPROVED EQUAL ETAL FENCE POSTS 2" X 2" X 14g. PARE FABRIC OR EQUIV. (OPTIONAL -PER SITE CONDITION) URY BOTTOM OF FILTER MATERIAL IN 8" X 12" TRENCH _______________- ___ I 1 6'-Q" I i I MAXIMUM it II li u u FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL I PATH NATIVE SOIL NDACKFILL MATERIAL OR GRAVEL BACKFILL IN TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF FENCE FABRIC ON THE SURFACE NOTE: ANGLE SILT FENCE BACK UP THE SLOPE AT THE END OF RUN. SYMBOL: PRESERVING VEGETATION VEGETATION AND TREE FENCING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4" HIGH I I ORANGE POLYETHYLENE I LAMINAR SAFETY NETTING I I CANOPY DRIP LINE I NOTES: I Si In I 1. 3-INCH WOOD CHIP MULCH .i MAY BE ADDED FOR ROOT I PROTECTION WITHIN FENCED AREA 2. OUTSIDE OF PROTECTIVE FENCING AREA, PROTECT ROOTS 2-INCHES OR LARGER IN DIAMETER BY USING I HAND EXCAVATION TECHNIQUES. 3. MINIMIZE CONSTRUCTION ZONE: PROTECT —� VEGETATION OUTSIDE CONSTRUCTION ZONE I PROTECTED ROOT ZONE WTHIN THE I BY SEGREGATING IT VATH HIGH VISIBIUTY CANOPY DRIP LINE -ACTUAL FEEDER CONSTRUCTION FENCING. ROOTS EXTEND WELL BEYOND DRIP UNE SYMBOL: VEG TREE PROTECTION DIAGRAM N.T.S. PPROVE PLANNING h wo RESUBMITTED NOV 0 6 2019 CITY Of FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .';�7 PROTECTION SILT FENCIN CITY STANDARD 0 BUILD A FENCE TO PROTECT NON- 34' ' DISTURBANCE AREA DURING CONSTRKTION 6' WOOD FENCE nowI TIME — '-� - A 'I .7 5' SIDE SETBACK 150—FT SP S. BLOCKS f\ two AaN'U,� • ri T NG A SIGN ON A TEMPORARY VCE OF WET LAND TO PROTECT /\ S IT F A D D P-S S FS 354TH ST LAGN U M FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 /�L-Atf� U M A 5 END PROJECT DATA: ZONE: RS7.2 1,111 1 01 HIV IJH r_%U \l/ \V \V \L + + +++ — PERMANENT PARCEL #3021049007 -r + + + + O VISIBLE + + + +_AMONUMENTS + + + +1+ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: + + ++ + ++ +++ + 14' E 165 FT OF W 1 /2 OF SE 1 /4 OF NE 1 /4 OF NW 1 /4 LESS E 135 FT OF + + + + + t+b c S 235 FT LESS CO RD +++,ten I LA ++++{+++ �, LOT COVERAGE: ++ + ++++7++++ A30 LOT AREA: 76,666-SF +++++ CA TILIVER AREA = 1 ,560-SF +-++ + AB VE > = -SF + + COVER PORCH COVERAGE: 360 DRIVEWAY: 513-SF +. + + + TOTAL COVERAGE: 2,433-SF + + + + + I PERMANENT + + + +_ VISIBLE + +++++ I MONUMENTS V I L L ! L L L ++++++++ i , LOT AREA 76,666-SF - 14953-SF = 61 ,713-SF (NONE WETLAND AREA) /+++ + + + WOODEN SPLIT ++++++ + 9� RAIL FENCE ++++++ 2 W/ C:RITICAL AREA SIGN TREE UNIT CALCULATION (FWRC 19.120.130): *++++. @ 80FT FRM BUFFER SF RESIDENTIAL ZONES (25 TREE UNITS/ARCE) 76,666/43500 = 1.76 (25 TREE) = 44 TREE UNITS REQ'S 6 TREES SHALL v I w w w v I v v LEGEND: BE REMOVE STOCK PILE ------------------- /, TOPSOIL, SEEDING, MULCHED -------- • SILT CONSTRUCTION E-- ENTRY ------------- \V \1/ \L \L \L \!/ J/ \L \L � \L \1/ � \1/ \1/ \L SILT FENCE -------------- 6 LIMITS -------- J DRAINAGE DIRECTION--------- - 2"-4" DECIDUOUS TREE---------------- y y y y y 2"-4" EVERGREEN TREE-------------- \1/ � \1/ \1/ \l/ \L \L \L \!/ � \L \1/ \L V/ J/ J/ \L, • • a C .Ji \1/ \L \L \L \1/ \L \L J/ \L IV \L \L \V \ W ILI \1/ \ y l A3 LEG, P R 0 V E j ASP A-23 \SLPLANNING , PERMANENT NOTE: �� ii VISIBLE • A FENCE TO 0 MONUMENTS City ` W �of Federal Oh�Y-o; BUILD \�� ' PROTECT NON— C'/r DISTURBANCE AREA a F L- A G N U M v v v v EXCAVATING PLAN: Dept. of Community Deveio!—T-m DURING CONSTRUCTION Perr�7it °� " CLEARING LIMIT AREA: 3324®SF — \� \ By — Date --Dot V EXCAVATING AREA: 290®CUBIC FEET W �{, rz) Ce�u0 € a 1�� Cq/1 d� ms. / �,,, y�• TREE SHALL BE REMOVE ILI 41 \I/ \L J/ \L \L \L ill V/ 11, IY k SIGN N A TEMPORARY �� v � v w � � � v/ � w w � w WET LANO TO PROTECT y �• • . URBANCE AREA. 4, / 1 V ILI v J V J vILIV y v v v J •` /y• v t ! t�o (�,y L �l/ mil/ •I/ .� .1/ .I/ IV �v \V �!/ v/ �v J/ .v ILI v/ .1/ .!/ �l/ v/ ` 10 \L \•rPERMANENT \L \L \I/ \L \L \I/ \L \L \1/ W \1/ \L \L \L \I/ V/ \L \t� •\L _V NORTH VISIBLE �» \ \A MONUMENTS \ y/ \I. v \1/ \L y \L \L \L v \I/ \I/ \1/ J/ V/ \1/ \1/ \I/ \1/ V/ v \V' • \V \I/ �` � \L \. A \L 3 \Lft,� •f>•w'^�•`i T11 \� \L .� �/ J/ \L \I/ \I/ \!/ .I/ \V \V \V \J/ \V \1/ \V \I/ \!/ V/ •v •\v y 3" Q' ay 4 e0 ANY 'ejc �i` :t�''RCi n l ED . c `m\ ODCDADCn DV. nnrn�nrn rnr�_ - DATE REVISION REV. BY: ' It( DESIGNS * ENGINEERS * BUILDS 3350513th Place S, Suite A Federal Way, WA 98003 Phone: 253-517-8773 - - W Web: .urbandevelopment.com, Ph. 253 835 1516 SHABLEVSKIY RESIDENCE CUSTOM DESIGN 8AvAv SW 354TH ST WAY. WA FEDERAL98023 BY: B.T. DATE: 03/18/19 4/25/2019 REVISION KHAI REVISED TO ADD WETLANDERB111 CHECKED: BT 11/5/19 REVISI❑N BEN REVISED T❑ ADD WETLAND CORRECTION SHEET # A0m1 PROJECT # 18m68AE EX.IE= 375.05 (8" NEW IE= 375.15 ( (REFERENCE SANITARY RIM 383.75 EX. CB RIM 383.4U---- IE 378.23 E 12" PVC 00 I r LIMIT OFI CLEARING 7474SF l I I cr) I I I I II _ ICI F— 'o' � I�l 0 oCOcjj I ; _I " I — )-E 0 SW ST) � 6 1 ; EX. CB RIM 383.32 IE 378.82 12" VC N \\ ' �� cv ` 48' OW -- ....,.�A • N01°31' 23"E 429.77' �� 34' / 6' WOOD FENCE 11 4y- - 1 ( -- -- - -- -- -- - - -- -- i --- o� �T / ,5" WWIrMW zX6"S A-18 ba i j/ i AGNUM N �► I 19" , o" 8" �L� lTiv4 A 4 \{ A5 END ••- P C" �• v i = x z \.' �P1 W �£' -4 r I N6;1 �'Fr j I s" �� s»FLAGNUM �' or P OVIDE 10 X 4' ® ryj' 8" 6 24" f� A30'�`1 A H PIRA y SP-24 �OPAG C ggT. ENTR PER I i' ,:` `•-71 rCITY STA DARD j s» 10"� \FLAGNUM -- • [y/ a nrccs axAu. I\ 1 ly �� L Y Y Y L• \ B_' y .._..-. . yWET LAND y y y .B �•� 9" 96 .NSF, y �� j �� ,2 A3.1 9,9 \ 1�i \ q A-231 Y Y *78'-6Ok \P .� A.3 :� ,B-�L) LO ��F AGNUM CL y q \\ (\ r 1� y � � W y \ 6— B�20 % 1 " 08`2„f \ s 7" �\ J:�;`FLAGN 0" 10" ''\ 12" 4" � 1.0 \ • y w y y \ ��ee��yy �_ • I \ A2•' \ LAGNU tB— I; '6nG3 ( p Ti I 1 O \ y Y Y + Y I I\ I \i^ �'�� I y y '\• c B-1 PINK 4 14» �. }_�� $ \ 8-18 CON2W NUM / A >pll OM A I I� 6 I'�^ ' B-18 CON2W " L^ ,' 86 " \ O © \ �yO M 13" \ \ L y y y V y Y \_ \ IRON POST I C) ell n y W J W Y Y Y y v\ co / Zx6" ��Y:7 /\ D P ••` ----�• - L L L V J' �Y— X6" -3 - ~ FL, GNUT_ \ - - N 01°31'23 E 622.68' f ` . "_ ! \ 15s'.. FLA NU1 DP-1 I 112 -6" I oo �� \\ \ \ \ DP o 0< \ \ \ \W U-) (L NIM= M1 \ \ \ IE= 379 (8"PVC OUT) 1 00 LEGEND r� 00 I 0 O NORTH ° SCALE I " - 30' N01°31'23"E 376 q EB-�LAGNUM 10• "� ,a" I I 14 J g} %W B-6LAGN PINK IB7_9_LAG I M B- AGNO r LA LAGNUM 10"( I LO 12" I CO r 76 B-7 PINK 120 ZL FLAGNUM AGNUM IF MO S,/�1=0-12 s "IO !' 30N3A rM OM ,9 \ 14q PROJECT DATA: ZONE: RS7.2 PARCEL #3021049007 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: E 165 FT OF W 1 /2 OF SE 1 /4 OF NE 1 /4 OF NW 1 /4 LESS E 135 FT OF S 235 FT LESS CO RD LOT COVERAGE: LOT AREA: 76,666-SF BUILDING COVERAGE = 1,560-SF COVER PORCH COVERAGE: = 360-SF DRIVEWAY: 513-SF TOTAL COVERAGE: 2,433-7 LOT AREA : 76,666-SF - 14953-SF = 61,713-SF (NON -WETLAND AREA) TREE UNIT CALCULATION (FWRC 19.120.130): SF RESIDENTIAL ZONES (25 TREE UNITS/ARCE) 76,666/43500 = 1.76 (25 TREE) = 44 TREE UNITS REQ'S EXCAVATING PLAN: CLEARING LIMIT AREA: 3324-SF EXCAVATING AREA: 290-CUBIC FEET i \ \\ I I \ I \\\ i EX RIMEX. CB 363 09 \ IE(MC) 00 S,F•R I l EX. C I RIM 365.49 1!or-FortG /001 / 1 1 1 l I ' 1 I l ; PV I I ® IE=3 5.5 IRON14" OPOST I 1 1 l 12" 2 » /'/� I 1 � 1 — — — — — — — — I— — — — Mx CO 1 1 M 4" N ST I I I 1 I 1 1 1 36B 1 1 EX. CB CO ; ;I RIM 369.08 11 I 1 CO ZI _�_370 I I of -O- o � I 6. 6" b0 a 10"I 00 ;io"TJ3 SP 3U PIN —� �FL GNUM '23"E _193-3.O1' QQ 17( 1» 2CiU�� r ----'-"-"-"-' - LIMIT OF CLEARING ' -v-- TREE PROTECTION AND SILT FENCE GAS METER M o MAIL BOX I GAS VALVE o GATE POLE w GAS MAIN-PAINTMARKS o CHAIN LINK FENCE (CLF) SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE I UNDERGROUND SEWER MAIN o I � I \1 M POWER METER -❑ WOOD FENCE (WDF) ,n A 0 SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT 0 CABLE TV RISER X - WIRE FENCE (WF) STORM DRAIN MANHOLE i 0 E--UTILITY POLE ANCHOR NEW PAVEMENT I 1 { I ® STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN --o- UTILITY POLE ' o EX. PAVEMENT co 3 UNDERGROUND STORM MAIN UTILITY POLE AND TRANSFORMER i STORM DRAIN YARD DRAIN D L POWER POLE WITH DROP&LIGHT NEW CONCRETE EX. CULVERT UNDERGROUND POWER PAINTMARKS EX.CONCRETE DEAD END \ _ _ FIRE H-YDRANT ___ _ _ _ -----__-___.___-__-__-__-__-_-_._____-___ - _ __-,--._-_ �0P__ OVERHEAD POWER DECIDUOUS TREE a 3 \ ® WATER METER N—OT— OVERHEAD TELEPHONE/CABLE SHRUBS 00 WATER VALVE � EXISTING SIGN FIR TREE WATER MAIN PAINTMARKS TELEPHONE RISER * CEDAR TREE a.� \� 0 ------ O- SILT FENCE STOCK PILE \I Lo�- - - \0� MAPLE TREE CLEARING LIMITS TOPSOIL, SEEDING, MULCHED �'' 2"-4" DECIDUOUS TREE , ©. eya - - �-''� DRAINAGE DIRECTION CONSTRUCTION ENTRY 2" EVERGREEN TREE - :Y.k•. 8627 NE 180th Street C Bothell, WA 08011 Ph: 206-303-7639 Email: benansteyCansteyengineering.com VICINITY MAP Approved By P,,, 10/21/19 �)H\i�)KI Y I DESIGNED PARCEL NO. 3021049007 PaXXXSW 354TH ST DRAWN BY D,TE FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 CHECKED BY DATE FILTER FENCE I i-- METAL FENCE POSTS C-0' tTLTER FABRIC MATERIAL 60' WIDE BOLLS USE STAPLES OR VARE RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC TO IM E MIRAFI 70OX OR PRE -APPROVED EQUAL —2' X 2' X 14go PARE FABRIC OR EQUIV. (OPTIONAL -PER SITE CONDITION) BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER MATERIAL IN 8' X 12' TRENCH FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL I BACKFILL VATH NAIVE SOIL in MATERIAL OR GRAVEL BACKFILL IN TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF FENCE FABRIC ON THE SURFACE XQTF.: ANGLE SILT FENCE BACK UP THE SLOPE AT THE END OF RUN. SYMBOL: PRESERVING VEGETATION VEGETATION AND TREE"' REE FENCING SHALL BE A I I MINIMUM OF 4' HIGH I I ORANGE POLYETHYLENE LAMINAR SAFETY NETTING I I CANOPY DRIP LINE NOTES: 1. 3-INCH WOOD CHIP MULCH MAY BE ADDED FOR ROOT c PROTECTION 1M1HIN FENCED 4 AREA. 2. OUTSIDE OF PROTECTIVE FENCING AREA, PROTECT ROOTS 2-INCHES OR LARGER IN DIAMETER BY USING HAND EXCAVATION TECHNIQUES I I 3. MINIMIZE CONSTRUCTION ZONE: PROTECT I I VEGETATION OUTSIDE CONSTRUCTION ZONE I OT Z PROTECTED ROOT ONE NITNIN THE I BY SEGREGATING IT WITH HIGH VISIBILITY CANOPY DRIP ACTUAL FEEDER CONSTRUCTION FENCING. ROOTS EXTEND WELL BEYOND DRIP LINE SYMBOL: v£G TREE PROTECTION DIAGRAM N.T.S. TREE SHALL BE REMOVE IN PROPOSED HOUSE ALILA1/5\AAA 19 TREES WITH X ON THEM SHALL BE REMOVED FOR HALF R.O.W CONTRUCTION: 3 TREES IN SIZE 4" + 1 TREE IN SIZE 5", 7", 8", 14", AND 22" + 5 TREES IN SIZE 6" + 3 TREES IN SIZE 10" AND 12" REFERENCE: Sanitary Sewer Plan/Profile - SW 354th St & Sewer Line "A" Bellacarino Woods -Dated on 10/10/94 ( Provided by LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT) °° 1� � , �.i-� �iNI �a City. of Federal Way Dept. of Community Development Permit # By Date--,-. r'K se-e UP 111-- (a,,d CA�qe PERMIT #19-100218—OOSM AE2019-53 I SHT 1 of 1 REFERENCE: Sanitary Sewer Plan/Profile - SW 354th St & Sewer Line "A" Bellacarino Woods -Dated on 10/10/94 ( Provided by LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT) D N Z� EX. SSMH o ? 0 RIM 38 mz z 00 m = i 0 3 0' 6 0' 65' 'D Z N V = 9 9 9 Fri R� ® 76'-8" — SCALE 1 - 30 I; 1 z NNm m 8" DI WATER `� o " _W_ 3 ...... . _ �_ 38 CL sr... _, P ,3 r — N. S.W 354TH 6T. - ° °) -N : ; : :. z 168 IF 8" PVC © 0.78% �, £ 0 : Q 3 80 .. •' REFOUD BARN & P 25" W 00165. 1' 0.15'S,0.33'W I ai ti PLS No. 16 2 y. 38 ,38 - j D RESIDENCE 380 380� % Cl IW'o ��` i fg_SINGLE FAM YPROPOSEyr R.O.W COVERAGE FOR 77' 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK = 5'X77' =385 SF 20' SW 354TH ST = 20'X77' = 1,540 SF 6" CONCRETE CURB = 0.5'X77'= 38.5 SF TOTAL HARD SURFACE COVERAGE = 1,963.5 SF 4' PLANTER STRIP = 4'X77' = 308 SF TOTAL HALF R.O.W COVERAGE = 2,271.5 SF CLEARING LIMIT FOR NEW R.O.W = 32.5X77' = 2,502.5 SF EXCAVATING AREA FOR NEW R.O.W = 95CF PROJECT DATA: ZONE: RS7.2 PARCEL #3021049007 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: E 165 FT OF W 1 /2 OF SE 1 /4 OF NE 1 /4 OF NW 1 /4 LESS E 135 FT OF S 235 FT LESS CO RD LOT COVERAGE: LOT AREA: 76,666-SF BUILDING COVERAGE = 1,560-SF COVER PORCH COVERAGE: = 360-SF DRIVEWAY: 513-SF TOTAL COVERAGE: 2,433-SF LOT AREA : 76,666-SF - 14953-SF = 61,713-SF (WETLAND AREA) TREE UNIT CALCULATION FWRC 19.120.130): SF RESIDENTIAL ZONES (25 TREE UNITS/ARCE) 76,666/43500 = 1.76 (25 TREE) = 44 TREE UNITS REQ'S EXCAVATING PLAN: CLEARING LIMIT AREA: 3324-SF EXCAVATING AREA: 290-CUBIC FEET S.W. 354 �•' o I �p � � -s� - /• Itbu o I I o I 376-4-- i a N 371a co r D -, z 7 Q V ``�\3 /74 C N � w 1, , e REVISIONS ANSTEY ENGINEERING 8627 NE 180th Street Bothell, WA 98011 Ph: 206-303-7639 Email: benanstey@ansteyengineering.com 0+60 1 +20 ROAD GUTTER PROFILE S.W. 354TH ST. LAKEHAVEN WATER & SEWER DISTRICT STANDARD NOTES FOR GRAVITY SEWER CONSTRUCTION 1. All work and materials shall conform to the standards of Lakehaven Water & Sewer District and Washington State Department of Transportation/Washington State Chapter American Public Works Association (WSDOT/APWA) "Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction," latest edition. 2. Contractor shall verify the location of all utilities that may be affected by this work and shall notify appropriate m� SSMH, TYPE 1-48" utility companies to field -locate their facilities before starting any excavation, in accordance with RCW 19.122. Wm EX.IE=3375.05 (8"PVC OUT)-E 3. Connections of new mains to existing facilities shall be temporarily sealed off until after upstream construction W0 NEW IE= 375.15 (6-PVC IN)-S is tested, cleaned and accepted. All construction debris and water shall be removed prior to opening the seal, W (REFERENCE SANITARY PROFlLE SW without flushing the debris downstream. N 354TH S� 4. Gravity sewer pipe material shall be as shown on the Plans, which will be one of the following and not Ln necessarily interchangeable: -Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) ASTM D-3034, SDR 35 (4"through 15") or ASTM F-679, SDR 35 (18"and larger) -Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) AWWA C-900, DR-18 (4"through 12") or AWWA C-905, DR-18 (14" • ..... ROW ' through 36") -High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) ASTM F-894, with gasketed joints -Ductile Iron ANSI A21.51/AWWA . — C 151, minimum Class 52, epoxy— Ilned with Protecto 401 TM Ceramic Epoxy 5. Crushed surfacing top course (a.k.a. 5/8" crushed rock) shall be used for pipe bedding for rigid and flexible J. .. • •.• '..., . gravity sewer pipe. The material shall be placed under the pipe to a compacted depth of 4"(for 27"and smaller ...` S.W. 354TH ST. pipe), and to a compacted depth of 6" (for pipe greater than 27"). The material shall be placed 6" over the top of .. .. flexible pipe and to the springline of rigid pipe. To assure uniform support, the material shall be carefully worked „ under the pipe haunches with a tool capable of preventing the formation of void spaces around the pipe. 260LF..8 PVC @'.1:81 % 6. All trench backfill shall be compacted to 95% of relative density, or greater if so shown on the Plans or ______ _ —__—__-__—_I ------- otherwise required by the road agency having jurisdiction, from the bottom of the excavation to the surface. -_------ Developer shall be responsible for all costs incurred for compaction testing. m� .... 7. Trench backfill shall be compacted prior to testing sewer main pipe, and side sewer stub(s) shall be air tested W9 at the some time as the sewer main. CO OD bow' 8. Manholes shall conform to WSDOT/APWA Standard Plan B-23a, Type 1 or Type 2 with eccentric cones, and NNW .. include 1-inch galvanized drop safety steps or polypropylene safety steps (Lane International Corp. Part No. N 8� P-14938) and at least one (1), and no more than five (5), four -inch (4") high adjustment rings below the frame and cover. All manhole exterior surfaces shall receive a protective coating of bituminous coal tar to a minimum thickness of 50 mils, applied at the factory. Where noted on the plans, manhole interior surfaces shall receive a Z corrosion protective epoxy coating of: •Polyshield SS-1000(by Specialty Products, Inc. (Lakewood, WA); 50 mils -) -- minimum thickness); or -Raven@405 (by RLS Solutions Inc. (Oklahoma); 100 mils minimum thickness). All coatings shall be applied in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. _ 9. Manhole frames and covers shall be cast iron, with the word "LAKEHAVEN" cast in the top, shall weigh 140 to 150 pounds, and shall have a single 1-inch lift hole fitted with one '/4" X 3" galvanized carriage bolt with burred end E to retain the nut and a flat washer to allow for 1" bolt travel. Covers shall be 25" in diameter. 10. Concrete collars reinforced with wire mesh shall be installed per District Standard Plan where shown on the I ` plans. II °'-_\7—'S$� 11. Manhole channels shall be produced to the full depth of the associated pipe diameter and to a width no less o than the outside diameter of the associated pipe and no more than 1�-inch in excess of the outside diameter of o the associated pipe. Manhole channels shall have a smooth finish. To minimize turbulence, side channels from inlet Z `. pipelines shall be curved toward the outlet pipeline to provide a smooth laminar flow transition from all inlet Im' '�� `.�.� pipelines to the outlet pipeline. Channel material shall be a shrink -resistant grout mix, using 6sacks per cubic yard Portland cement and 7/8" graded aggregate. For gravity sewer systems 15"and larger, PREDL®Manhole Liner systems by PREDL Systems North America, Inc. (Burnaby, B.C.) shall be utilized for channels, floors and pipeline connection systems for manholes. 12. Manhole shelves shall have a broom finish, and be sloped 1/-inch to 1-inch per foot toward the channel. 13. Pipe ends of all inlet and outlet pipelines shall not extend more than 2 inches inside the manhole, and all penetrations shall be smoothly grouted around the pipe with shrink- resistant grout. 14. No joints for flexible pipe inlets and outlets shall be within 10 feet of the manhole, and pipelines shall be connected to the manhole with PVC manhole collars. Flexible boot collars are prohibited. 15. Side sewer stubs shall be installed at a grade of at least 2%, and their termini shall be at a depth adequate to serve the intended property, capped and marked by a white 2X4 post labeled "Sanitary Side Sewer." 1+65 A P —'# -0 V I �'� - l'! _� �"" ' ' * - �"� L'�' ' �-- " � PL I iC" VICINITY MAP City of Feder=' ' Dept. of Community s ;i ;Dment Permit # - � - Cho -U--h By 2r- Date ---�apIq_PERMIT #19-100218—OOSM _` S�e q F=- u..ae- ` ova 9� Approved By ePa 10/8/15 SHABLEVSKIY` PROJECT E PARCEL NO. 3021049007 ROAD PROFILE DESIGNED BY XXX SW 354TH ST SHEET __. D`TE FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 CHECKED BY DATE aE2019— 53 sHr 2 OF- 2 EX.IE= 375.05 (8' NEW IE= 375.15 ( NEW SIDE SEWER RIM 383.75 EX. CB RIM 383.4D---—"\ IE 378.23 E 12" PVC I I I 1 II _ j3J 01 � ICI 1 I O M 1 1 5.75 _E )-S : �• ; t� X 59' SANITARY �.•� / �..� _ PION - SEV ER EASEMENT �.• _ 0. I I EX.. CB N. RIM 383.32 1 I IE 378.82 12" VC N ' \\ N I. A I ix00 48 I 6' WOOD 429.777 FENCE L_ NOT31'23"E �.NO e rib NORTH 0 3J0' 60SCALE 1 30' La� N01°31' 23" E 85.00' 30N33 OOM ,9 37 6 -P IT FENCE i 15" a w'r weir 2xs" -- .. `' i 3' ui1uTY I =3 6.75 ' II . A-18 N --- bL2 I LAGNUM ,off ,4" p I 14 VICINITY M A ' AGNUM A4 ( j 3 -21 STRIP > 19" 10. 14" O STREET E I3�' I�L—�� V'Vt � A 5 END _ _-� 18" � i slo CITY STArmARD s" ��' --� _ _.. ,1, �t B-6LAGNU r I I ^" I METER \, W A— 20 i' *S,wP 1 W 1 �� _ -4 PINK i ` i s" �� 9^FLAGNUMoc ••W W 1" 1`4-% ...... W �„ 1. �� i AM 2x5" r j A30 u� y IB�6LAG 1 P VIDE 10' X 4'. l+ I ASHY "SPIRA SP-24 JOP%LAG M B-{�AGF7 T O \� ENTRY. PER s � 1 �y y �P 11 Y Y 1 Cv a" ; � C9 iT..STANDARD. 1 �'I T. B" 10" r J��IFLAGNUM B- LA LAGNUM 10.(9 I LO LIMIT OF CLEARING M L9 :: .v v .v .t 1 T ,2" I I`:, �• y Y Y 4Y Y y 1 q 7474SF 4]I 2 R ITat I 1 I - - C/- J•�`�� \ % B-7 PINK 12 T I ' (\ Y W Y + Y k t 6" y- 77LF 1: PVC ® j�• `¢VC eE R'R`ow cS"A`I P,� 1 `U` B-1 q L _ �� FLAGNUM \\ Cat iEX. CB /I ^N I, y v .v - .v y .v y:l ��\\ AGN NM M \ I 1 1 ; � WET LAND W 1. �� B-2 MF o ° .} / \\\ ' RIM 363.09 1 I 1 I r �'� 9" % W �6 �y v v 1' J'S< P3�7 _ AGNUM cif ^v' I IE(MC) NEW TYPE 1 C C\haEE .RD,cc1aN spa FEea ' t 1. \ t 2 A 3.n 1 1 ` V PER CITY STANDARD I \ 1 1 q A- 23 PINK _ RIM 382.54 / \\ 1 1 / y w �'/8'-6tL .v A3-B��i LAG S F R IE 379.20 ,a' PVC ,_ \ o �F AGNUM \ v B- W n I ^ \ ( n 1^ B- PINK /� V I 12" q , o ( Q,, Q , "z\� \ e. v y w \ B-2o 'Lj W O W \ I RIM 365.49 II R a? 1 " =r022 p `\ 0 6 �" �� P4) .� v �. ,�FLAGN % /` a" 10"60 q I j am, r( s I o ��" t \•y Y y �9'-7 Y 1 B-19N �[" fe UM I q 16 Z P9 I (� � I 0" ,o" 12" 4^ PO� \. y y y y y GNUM tt \ y Y Y I. y 7 !1 \ a 11 I I I� _Go-_ I _ Y y y y y y y'\ ��l B-1 PINK wiM " 1°3 23 E 1 9 4 I//�� 14" \ _ �% B-18CON2W NUM -- 10" -- -- -- -- -- - I A e41 W A IVAVP \ '°xxir.w'nAsirir "°'c' f� \ ,Y y J� �Y 'k 41 .t� �Y ''\. \ B-18 CON2 A t�'1 1'k �� 10" 0" t 17" 2x10" I " /1 I13" \ y y y Y $6' y Y \ O J SP 3U PIN L ♦ IRON POST I GNUM 36a'3x8 IE=3 5.5 Y I I ; \ . 14" �,J"•J I L( CC) �G� 8" A3 .\ Y Y y L Y Y Y V Y Y \ .\ IRONPOST I 6" _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DP _3 — `— r y y y y y � y � y y - - - 12 CO �c \-- \ \ -- - -F 6PlUM -- -- -- -- -- - —� 17 I , I 00" B a FLAGNUFf— \ \ - 156k-6- FLA U DP-1 112'-6" N 01°31'23 E 622.68' ��, M 14" N ST M� %, \ \\ \ DP iI r i I I (� ; � 1 I((� M 1zM06 \\ \ \ \ r / 368 ' 0(1 ' 1 1 Q cf Z \ \ ySY , I 1 I EX. CB I 0) RIM 369.08LO 03 1 1 ' 00 I -- -370 I O I I 1 r0 o -O 'I 1 I , I MQ�GAS METER o MAIL BOXLEGEND ;Iz I:1 1 1 GAS VALVE o GATE POL I w ; ; i �\ SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE GAS MAIN-PAINTMARKS o CHAIN LINk FENCE (CLF) 1 Q i UNDERGROUND SEWER MAIN ® II-- I� M POWER METER ---❑ WOOD FENCE (WDF) II `o I C SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT — I II M I � � � CABLE TV RISER X WIRE FENCE (WF) , I ` 1 M II STORM DRAIN MANHOLE E— UTILITY POLE ANCHOR NEW PAVEMENT 1 STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN -a- UTILITY POLE EX. PAVEMENT 00 3 I M UNDERGROUND STORM MAIN UTILITY POLE AND TRANSFORMER ID STORM DRAIN YARD DRAIN NEW CONCRETE POWER POLE WITH DROPLIGHT i EX. CULVERT UNDERGROUND POWER PAINTMARKS L 1 EX.CONCRETIE IAD END 1---__--- ....__----------------�.__.._-----____--—__—______.__�_____.___.-.__-- DE ( _ FIRE HYDRANT--__ __ ___-- P= OVERHEAD POWER DECIDUOUS TREE EE3 WATER METER --OT— OVERHEAD TELEPHONE/CABLE SHRUBS 00 WATER VALVE -� ,a EXISTING SIGN FIR TREE WATER MAIN PAINTMARKSEj TELEPHONE RISER CEDAR TREE 3 SILT FENCE STOCK PILE \0/ MAPLE TREE CLEARING LIMITS © TOPSOIL, SEEDING, MULCHED 'tU<Ni`' 2"-4" DECIDUOUS TREE I DRAINAGE DIRECTION CONSTRUCTION ENTRY \`.>�''j 2"-4" EVERGREEN TREE I s I NO DATE BY IAPPR REVISIONS AIN�!)Ihl hiNU1iNhh1\'1_I%11 — Approved By SHABLE�/SI� Y PROJECT BPA 10/8/19 8627 NE 180th Street , �� ''7 � DESIGNED BY DATE PARCEL NO. 3021049007 K, } a B P A 10/8/19Bothell, WA 98011 .��_�:v ,A,.XXX SW 354TH ST P h : 2 0 6 — 3 0 3 —'7 6 3 9 ..,�s rr A. • r. T�j. ,5ti,, .• DRAWN BY DATE FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 Email: benansteyCansteyengineering.com 1031 2019 CHECKED BY DATE PROJECT DATA: ZONE: RS7.2 PARCEL #3021049007 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: E 165 FT OF W 1 /2 OF SE 1 /4 OF NE 1 /4 OF NW 1 /4 LESS E 135 FT OF S 235 FT LESS CO RD LOT COVERAGE: LOT AREA: 76,666—SF BUILDING COVERAGE = 1,560—SF COVER PORCH COVERAGE: = 360—SF DRIVEWAY: 513—SF TOTAL COVERAGE: 2,433—SF LOT AREA : 76,666—SF — 14953—SF = 61,713—SF (NON —WETLAND AREA) TREE UNIT CALCULATION (FWRC 19.120.130): SF RESIDENTIAL ZONES (25 TREE UNITS/ARCE) 76,666/43500 = 1.76 (25 TREE) = 44 TREE UNITS REQ'S EXCAVATING PLAN: CLEARING LIMIT AREA: 3324—SF EXCAVATING AREA: 290—CUBIC FEET FILTER FENCE USE STAPLES OR VAARE RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC // TO WIRE MIRAFI 7DOX OR PRE -APPROVED EQUAL FENCE POSTS 2' X 2' X 14ga HIRE FABRIC OR - cETAL EQUIV. (OPTIONAL -PER SITE CONDITION) o ii 11 21. I I RY BOTTOM OF FILTER MATERIAL IN 8' X 1Y TRENCH MAXIMUM -r- I MAXXIMUM U U FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL I w BACKFILL WITH NATIVE SOIL MATERIAL OR GRAVEL BACKFILL IN TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF FENCE FABRIC ON THE SURFACE NM' ANGLE SILT FENCE BACK UP THE SLOPE AT THE END OF RUN. SYMBOL: O PRESERVING VEGETATION VEGETATION AND TREE r{[•L� FENCING SHALL BE A I I MINIMUM OF 4' HIGH I I ORANGE POLYETHYLENE LAMINAR SAFETY NETTING I I CANOPY DRIP LINE I N 1, 3-INCH WOOD CHIP MULCH MAY BE ADDED FOR ROOT PROTECTION VATHIN FENCED AREA, 2 OUTSDE OF PROTECTIVE FENCING { AREA, PROTECT ROOTS 2-INCHES I 'f OR LARGER IN DIAMETER BY USING HAND EXCAVATION TECHNIQUES 3• MINIMIZE CONSTRUCTION ZONE: PROTECT I VEGETATION OUTSIDE CONSTRUCTION ZONE I PROTECTED ROOT ZONE WITHIN THE I BY SEGREGATING IT VATH HIGH VISIBILITY CANOPY DRIP LINE -ACTUAL FEEDER CONSTRUCTION FENCING. ROOTS EXTEND WELL BEYOND DRIP UNE SYMBOL: vEG TREE PROTECTION DIAGRAM N.T.S. TREE SHALL BE REMOVE IN PROPOSED HOUSE 008A/5\©8z& 19 TREES WITH X ON THEM SHALL BE REMOVED FOR HALF R.O.W CONTRUCTION: 3 TREES IN SIZE 4" + 1 TREE IN SIZE 5", 7", 8", 14", AND 22" + 5 TREES IN SIZE 6" + 3 TREES IN SIZE 10" AND 12" REFERENCE: Sanitary Sewer Plan/Profile - SW 354th St & Sewer Line "A" Bellacarino Woods -Dated on 10/10/94 ( Provided by LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT) l� Y / APE PLANNING City of Federal Way Dept. of Community Development Permit # By Date PERMIT #19-100218—OOSM AE2019-53 I SHT 1 of 2