Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
16-100205
CITY OF -4*�kL Federal Way Centered on Opportunity pp unity CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway, com Jim Ferrell, Mayor March 15, 2019 Mr. Sergey Adzhigirey 32022 51h Avenue SW Federal Way, WA 98023 er .a a !c FIDE Re; File #19-101087-00-AD; CRITICAL AREAS VEWFICATION Adzhigirey Property, 30523 28th Avenue SW, Parcel 416660-0600, Federal Way Dear Mr. Adzhigirey: The City of Federal Way's Community Development Department has received your request for verification of critical areas located on the above -mentioned property, parcel #416660-0600. Ding County Health Department needs an updated critical areas verification letter From the city before their department can approve the septic design. The proposed property is located within a Geologically Hazardous Area (GHA), landslide, and erosion hazard areas, and has a Category 11 wetland with associated 100-foot buffer on -site. On January 14, 2016, the applicant submitted a reasonable use request to modify or waive the requirements of the r- ty's we regulations to construct a single family residence within the wetland buffer, pursuant to Fed I Wry Reuised Code (FWRC) 19.15.0,040. On March 28, 2017, the city issued the Process III Land Use Approval with Conditions, for the Adzhigiry Reasonable Use Request. The location of the house and improvements, including the om-site septic system, do not impact the wetland; however, impacts to the wetland buffer are unavoidable. As part of the Process III review, the applicant submitted a Wetland Assessment and Buffer Restoration Plan, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc., to minimize the impacts to the wetland buffer. The city Forwarded the plan to our wetland consultant, Perteet Inc., for peer review. Perteet approved the project with the foliowirzg comment regarding the septic system: Perteet recognizes that the proposed septic system may have more specific site restrictions and may need to intrude greater than 50% into the wetland buffer. The septic system may or may not be approved under an expired permit from King County Health Department. If expired, Perteet recommends the septic system be reconfigured to move about 15 feet east away from the wetland boundary within the same slope contours and soil type as currently proposed. This would eliminate removal of one 18-inch and one 23-inch big leaEmaple trees. Eight trees between 10-inches and 30-inches would still be removed by this action. Perteet recognizes that King County Public Health shall have input into the septic system design and location and may coordinate directly with the City for critical areas intrusions (Perteet Memo for Adzhigirey Property Review, Page 3, March 8, 2017). Mr. Sergey Adzhigirey Page 2 of 2 March 15, 2019 The city has no objections to the location ° a .�lan'p�mark d up by Peet are taken into consideration. above. ystem. in regards to the critical areas if the mentioned comment and enclosed R If you have any questions regax�g this letter, please feel free to contact me at 253-835-2641, or Becky.chapin@cityoffederalway.eom. Sincerely, �a' � t � Beckytzr SeniorPI enc: Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan Markup Drawings, Prepared by Perteet, Inc. Doc. I.D. 78872 19-101087-00-AD eirr ork Federal Way RECEIVED MAR 0 S 1019 CITY pF Fi?pe�.. WAY FILE NUMBER / 3- Applicant NAME Aleksandr Adzhigirey / Sergey BUSINESS/ORGANIZATION MAILING ADDRESS 32022 5th Ave SW CITY Property Description of List/Describe Federal Way STATE Parcel 416660-0600 ZIP 98023 REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION COMMUNITY MN'FLOPMENT DEPARTMENT 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 9800 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.ritvoffederalwa %cone Request for Critical Area Designation Review. For Staff Use ❑ Code Interpretation/Clarification LPN Critical Areas Letter/Analysis/Peer Review ❑ Request for Extension (Land Use/Plat Approval) ❑ Revisions to Approved Permit ❑ Tree Removal ❑ Zoning Compliance Letter Date 3 V j TFAX RY PHONE 206-790-2911 NATE PHONE Sergey.Adzhigirey@gmail.com - Check Current Fee Schedule - No Fee (Actual Cost if Applicable) Check Current Fee Schedule Check Current Fee Schedule - Check Current Fee Schedule Check Current Fee Schedule Bulletin 4079 —January 4, 2016 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Request for Administrative Deci�: I V. .,% Grette AssociatesLLC -1wENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Prepared by: Grette AssociatesLLc February 12, 2015 2102 North 30th Street, Ste A Tacoma, WA 98403 Prepared for: City of Federal Way File No.: 205.015 Attention: Becky Chapin, Associate Planner 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: Adzhigirey Property Wetland Assessment Review 1 INTRODUCTION On February 12, 2015, Grette AssociatesLLc performed a third party review of a wetland assessment prepared by J.S. Jones and AssociatesLLc (the "Report", dated May 28, 2014). The purpose of this review was to verify the category of the wetland as defined in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.175 and to assess the accuracy described in the Report. The subject properly is located on King County tax parcel 4166600600 and is located at 30XXX 28th Avenue Southwest in Federal Way, Washington. 2 METHODS 2.1 Site Review Grette Associates completed a site visit on February 12, 2015 to assess the subject site for consistency with the information provided in the Report. All relevant portions of the property were inspected. 2.2 Document Review A Grette Associates biologist conducted a thorough review of the Report. The review focused on verifying the accuracy of the descriptions within the Report and compliance with the current version of the FWRC. 3 RESULTS 3.1 Site Visit Review The Report appears to have characterized the wetland and associated buffer accurately. The wetland is a Palustrine Scrub/Shrub - Forested wetland that is dominated by salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis) and red alder (Alnus rubra) with an understory of skunk cabbage (Lysichiton americanum) and common horsetail (Equsitum arvense). The upland area is dominated by Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis), vine maple (Acer cirsinatum), red alder, Douglas fir 2102 North 30`h Street, Ste. A Tacoma, WA 98403 Ph: 253.573.9300 Fx: 253.573.9321 1 (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and western red cedar (Thuja plicata). No additional wetlands were identified onsite or within 200 feet. Grette Associates did identify a small stream that is located west of SW Dash Point Rd. The stream is approximately 150 feet west of the subject property, and is outside the 100 foot jurisdictional limit from the property that is stated in FWRC Chapter 19.145.030. 3.2 Document Review The Report is consistent with the evaluation requirements of FWRC 19.175.010. The Report provides adequate descriptions of the plant communities within the wetland and associated buffer areas and provides an adequate description of the wetland's hydrology and soils. In addition, the Report adequately evaluates and assesses the existing wetland functions and values. Comparing the Report with the previous wetland assessment (J.S. Jones and Associates 2006), there is inconsistency in the categories applied to the wetland. The 2006 wetland assessment used the Washington State Department of Ecology's 2004 Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (Ecology 2004), and rated the wetland as a Category III wetland. However, the current version of the FWRC does not utilize Ecology's rating system. Therefore, the 2006 wetland categorization is not compliant with the current version of the FWRC. The current Report (2014) accurately categorizes the wetland as a Category 11 wetland based on FWRC 19.175.020. Grette Associates concurs with the Report's categorization of the wetland. Per FWRC 19.175.020, Category II wetlands are subject to a 100 foot buffer width. 4 SUMMARY Upon thorough review, the Report meets the requirements of Chapter 19.175 of the FWRC. Grette Associates recommends that the Report be accepted by City staff. The review of the Wetland Assessment was conducted using the best available scientific information and methodologies and the best professional judgment of Grette Associates staff wetland biologists. Final acceptance and approval of the report is at the discretion of City staff. If you have any questions on the document review, please contact me at (253) 573-9300, or by email at chadw@gretteassociates.com. Best Regards, GRETTE ASSOCIATES" �o Chad Wallin Biologist 2102 North 30th Street, Ste. A Tacoma, WA 98403 Ph: 253.573.9300 Fx: 253.573.9321 References: Hruby, T. 2004. Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington — Revised [Annotated version]. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication # 04-06-025. J.S. Jones and Associates, LLC. 2006. Wetland Assessment of the Adzhigirey Property. Prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, LLC. June 5, 2006. 2102 North 30`" Street, Ste. A Tacoma, WA 98403 Ph: 253.573.9300 Fx: 253.573.9321 3 pERTEET Better communities, by design To: Becky Chapin, Associate Planner, City of Federal Way PERTEET.COM 2707 COLBY AVENUE, SUITE 900 EVERETT, WA 98201 425.252.7700 From: Bill Kidder, PWS, Lead Ecologist, Perteet Jason Walker, PLA, PWS, Environmental Manager and Wetland Ecologist, Perteet Date: March 8, 2017 Re: Adzhigirey Property —Critical Areas Reasonable Use Plan Review As directed by the City, Perteet is reviewing the proposed Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan pursuant to Federal Way Municipal Code (FWMC) critical areas code that was current when the project application was vested in 2014. Perteet previously commented on the Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan for parcel #416660-0600 submitted on July 22, 2016 in a review memo dated September 5, 2016. In that memo, Perteet explained that an incorrect wetland boundary with 165-foot buffer illustrated on the plan as well as an unflagged property boundary during the site visit precluded Perteet's accurate review of the development proposal. The applicant has since updated the proposed Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan to include the correct 2014 City -vested Category II wetland boundary with 100 foot buffer. The updated Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan was resubmitted for review on January 4, 2017. Based on Perteet's observations, photos, and notes collected during the first site visit on August 17, 2016, a second site visit is deemed not necessary. The Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan proposes to construct one residential dwelling with a 1,330 SF footprint, one driveway with a 1,600 SF footprint, one septic field with a 3,450 SF footprint, and a series of four stormwater infiltration trenches between 15" and 20" deep that drain from the dwelling unit. They additionally propose to construct a split rail & silt fence around the dwelling unit and driveway that contains four critical areas signs. Utilities are proposed to extend east from the dwelling unit to the 28" Ave SW right-of-way. Findings: 1) The position and extent of wetlands and the 100-foot wetland buffer on the subject parcel precludes the applicant from proposing any reasonable development action on the subject property without encroaching on wetlands or wetland buffers. The applicant has applied and the City is granting a waiver per FWMC 19.150.040 "Reasonable Use of Subject Property." 2) Per FWMC 19.175.030 "Structures, improvements, and land surface modification within regulated wetlands," Perteet is able to confirm that the Reasonable Use Plan is not proposing to construct elements of the proposed development within wetlands. 3) Per FWMC 19.175.040 "Structures, improvements, and land surface modification within regulated wetland buffers," Perteet is able to confirm that the Reasonable Use Plan proposes to construct the whole of the proposed development within the 100-foot wetland buffer. Further, the proposed development proposes to construct project elements within 25 feet of the wetland boundary and within the inner 50% of the wetland buffer. These include portions of the septic field, the infiltration trenches, and the south side of the dwelling unit footprint (wetland flag A-97 is just across property boundary (JS Jones and Assoc. Wetland Assessment May 28, 2014)). FWMC 19.175.040(5) "Structures, ?-PERTEET Better communities, by design PERTEET. COM 2707 COLBY AVENUE, SUITE 900 EVERETT, WA 98201 425.252.7700 improvements and land surface modification within regulated wetland buffers" restricts development to the outer 50% of the buffer width, but in no case less than 25 feet,..." 4) The Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan proposes development within wetland buffers per FWMC 19.145.440(5) "Buffer Reduction" yet does not provide a buffer enhancement plan as stipulated to implement this subsection of the code. 5) The Executive Summary of the Reasonable Use Plan states that the septic drain field was previously approved (entity not identified). Perteet contacted King County Public Health Wastewater Program to confirm the septic field application. Staff at the Public Health Department confirmed that an application was submitted in 2014, approved in 2016, and expired in 2016. Perteet is awaiting a call back regarding the expiration question. Attached to this memo is the "King County Site Development Process Flow Chart" for the On -site Septic Systems permitting process that includes securing a Critical Areas Designation Letter and applying for a building permit from the local municipality. Recommendations: Per FWMC 19.150.040(4), alternative site layouts are possible that would minimize critical areas impacts while still allowing reasonable use of the subject property. The currently proposed development plan can be repositioned with minimal design changes that minimizes the size and extent of impervious improvements within the 100-foot wetland buffer. Further, FWMC 19.175.040(5) "Buffer reduction" provides for intrusions into the outer 50% of the wetland buffer under certain conditions stated in the code. Perteet recommends the City grant certain specific intrusions into the outer 50% of the wetland buffer as suggested below and on the Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan Markup Drawing attached at the end of this memo. Perteet recommends the dwelling unit be moved, in its currently proposed layout and orientation, northward and about eight feet west on the parcel into the outer 50% of the wetland buffer. This would also eliminate the removal of a cluster of large big maple trees near the southwest corner of the currently proposed dwelling unit footprint. Moving the footprint about 8 feet west would avoid additional cutting into slopes on the east side of the dwelling unit while avoiding removal of two 20-inch maple trees near the northwest corner of Perteet's proposed dwelling unit footprint position. Utilities as currently proposed would still run east from the southeast corner of the dwelling unit to the 28th Ave SW right-of-way. To accommodate repositioning the dwelling unit to the outer 50% of the wetland buffer, the proposed 1,600 SF driveway can be decreased in size and extent while retaining the same current driveway slopes, relative position on the parcel, and currently proposed position against the dwelling unit north walls. The driveway proposed by Perteet would be 15 feet wide between the property setback and the northwest corner of the dwelling unit, extending to 20+feet wide near the northeast corner of the dwelling unit. A fifteen foot wide driveway can accommodate two parked vehicles side by side at the inner end of the driveway. Moving the dwelling unit as proposed by Perteet would not affect the currently proposed septic system supply line or grinder pump location extending from the northeast corner of the dwelling unit relative to the repositioned dwelling unit location. Repositioning the house on the north half of the subject property allows the stormwater infiltration trenches to be relocated further north on the subject parcel along a consistent elevation line at least 50 feet away from p E RT E E T PERTEET 2707 COLBY AVENUE, SUITEE90000 by design EVERETT. WA 98201 425.252.7700 the wetland boundary and that avoids removing trees. The infiltration trenches would continue to be situated downslope of the dwelling unit and operate on gravity feed. Perteet recognizes that the proposed septic system may have more specific site restrictions and may need to intrude greater than 50% into the wetland buffer. The septic system may or may not be approved under an expired permit from King County Health Department. If expired, Perteet recommends the septic system be reconfigured to move about 15 feet east away from the wetland boundary within the same slope contours and soil type as currently proposed. This would eliminate removal of one 18-inch and one 23-inch big leaf maple trees. Eight trees between 10-inches and 30-inches would still be removed by this action. Perteet recognizes that King County Public Health shall have input into the septic system design and location and may coordinate directly with the City for critical areas intrusions. Per FWMC 19.155.020, a physical barrier must be erected for the duration of construction to prevent construction related runoff and erosion from entering wetlands, geologically hazardous areas, or other critical areas. Perteet recommends that temporary construction fencing containing silt -screening fabric that meets Federal Way's approved construction stormwater manual be installed prior to and for the duration of construction. Perteet also recommends pursuant to 19.155.050 "Other Requirements" that permanent critical areas fencing with signage every 150 feet, as offered in the Reasonable Use Plan, be erected to demarcate critical areas and critical area buffers beyond the fencing. Perteet's proposed fencing location gives the subject property reasonable allowance for yard space around the dwelling unit while maintaining at least a 25 foot minimum buffer width as mandated in FWMC 19.175.040(5). Additional usable lawn space will be available in the septic field where trees and shrubs are not allowed to be planted. Perteet's recommendations use the Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan proposals while striving to minimize the applicant's necessary site design changes and while minimizing the critical areas buffer impacts as mandated under FWMC 19.150.040(4) Reasonable Use of Subject Property and 19.155.010 Responsibility of applicant. Buffer Enhancement: Per FWMC 19.175.040(5) "Buffer reduction," buffer enhancement using native vegetation is required for development intrusions into wetland buffers. Perteet recommends the applicant prepare and submit a Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan. Suggested buffer enhancement actions might include: • Permanent fencing and critical areas signage per FWMC 19.155.050 and as offered in the Reasonable Use Plan. • Invasive and non-native plant species removal throughout the subject property's wetlands and wetland buffers. Non-native species include but are not limited to Himalayan blackberry, English holly, cherry laurel, non-native nightshades, purple loosestrife, and English ivy. • Planting of native trees and shrub species within the subject property's wetland buffer to mitigate for the loss of buffer zone native trees and shrubs by project actions and to revegetate with native species those areas where invasive and non-native species will be removed. Native species planting stock shall be sourced from a locally grown native plant nursery. END OF MEMO W a Lp 0) C cm N C (p O 7 C Z t o o a� w m (D C 0-5 C N N d -5 L ICU O C6 � U dCL CoQ L °' 4 �cc, N r a N Z Q a!!IPI!h1 P- `s-04S •spusl]aM slulginsuoo Ivjuauzuojinug -oul sajuioossv PUB sauof -S -f z . "o Ala °a00 U om�ez W nECN cl JtLu E Z t J 6 ��¢a0 uald asn algauosBaa Aaaislyzpv z ao I 133HS m lleugo4�Aa-j� LL6Z-O6L90Z AaivaS fZOB6 uo7 -14'm."m-aPaA'M$ a�V NS Z . Aar�s-Iyzpy ipuasmaiy wr i017=,. 1. 31VOS c o ZSTHI „N�d 50�� ucLl = �J-- R a w OD m °' c a c_ cuo Z L w ED j N it O . L� 11[ p T C O IA F- z° a� Iaram �LL °vi U daU -Q ` D L 85 j N N z v a pan iw�orwrrs rrnsxa .ar v. w a3!IPIIM Pue `surza.gg `spuepaM sluulinsuoD iuluauiuopnug -oul sa;siaossd puu sauof 'S 'f irrciinsxoa UOId esn elgeuossel f Aeal6lyzpV wm �iewloy®Rai b � �gZ-O6L90Z FaB,aS EZ006 ..IBuiys.m 'A.m l.apej •ms'a V 419 ZZOZE aC 96 zz�g= # N C. €�9 its m tls* r$@ 5 € Br P'g e= 3 es9�E=`9„B..s O$Jiig�li� .Ei- a 9 o eiy ''.EC C`o :�'':t'gz�e3 eaatl3 F 31gg �y ME a 3e i $ Ec 8 E No„-=e - E _e9t� 3a'14. '�e�-r a ee.<< 9d •S� i-� p]3 ;m �`-�ve e� =°tt'E� `en�P3� �® `33 4E.3 Ea liLv`�fG R��m a aE I ��9 `�aa g€ag 4's .� -• • 7�eE .'�� �i<'Nf2� a�-r .•1<2 .'t6LLLL 33�m Z to Z 133HS 3NON A9 NMY,10 31VOS aro ,�®ems m �"s w ' z W CITY OF � Federal Way March 28, 2017 Sergey Adzhigirey 32022 5"' Avenue SW Federal Way, WA 98023 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor RE: File #16-100205-00-UP; PROCESS III `PROJECT APPROVAL' Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Request, 30523 28"' Avenue SW, Federal Way Dear Mr. Adzhigirey: The City of Federal Way has completed the administrative review of the proposed wetland buffer intrusion for a new single family residence. The applicant proposes to construct a new single family residence with a footprint of 1,330 sq. ft., 1,600 sq. ft. driveway, on -site septic system, and associated site improvements, at 30523 28"' Avenue SW. Access to the residence will be from 28"' Avenue South. A Category II wetland and associated 100-foot wetland buffer encompasses the entire subject property. The location of the house and improvements do not impact the wetland; however, impacts to the wetland buffer are unavoidable. The applicant has submitted a reasonable use request to modify or waive the requirements of the City's wetland regulations, pursuant to FWRC 19.150.0401. The Process III application received January 14, 2016, and "Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan," prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc., resubmitted on January 4, 2017, are hereby approved with conditions, based on the enclosed Exhibit A, Findings for Project Approval, incorporated into this decision in full, and the following conclusion based on those facts: l . The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan; 2. The proposal is consistent with all applicable provisions of Federal lay Revised Code (FWRC); 3. The proposal is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare; 4. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand froth the proposal; 5. The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration; and 6. Traffic safety impacts for all modes of transportation, both on and off site, are adequately mitigated. The remainder of this letter outlines the land use review process required, conditions of approval, and outlines procedure relating to appeals and approval periods for this decision. This land use decision does not authorize initiation of construction activities. In June 2015. the City updated the Critical Areas code. Flowever, the project is vested to the code in effect at the time the building permit application is deemed complete, January 30, 2014. As such. this Reasonable Use request has been reviewed using 2014_ FWRC Division V. Critical Areas (FWRC Chapters 19.145-19.185.) Mr. Adzhigirey March 28. 2017 Page 2 REVIEW PROCESSES REQUIRED The site is within the residential Single -Family (RS15.0) zoning, district. Detached dwelling units are permitted in this zone subject to the provisions of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.200.010. Using Process III, Project Approval, the City can administratively approve a modification or waiver to FWRC Division V, Critical Areas, pursuant to FWRC 19.150.040, Reasonable use of the subject property, subject to criteria. Process III approval does not grant license to begin any type of site work. SEPA PROCESS The application is exempt from review under the State EM,ironmental Policy Act (SEPA) as it does not exceed city adopted flexible thresholds set forth in FWRC 14.15.030(a) for construction of residential structures up to twenty dwelling units. No work is planned within the wetlands. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Based on the criteria above, recommendations provided by the City's wetland consultant Perteet Inc., and the Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan, the proposed intrusion is approved as conditioned below. 1) Prior to, and for the duration of, construction activity, the applicant must install temporary construction fencing containing silt screening fabric. A preconstruction inspection by the Planning Division is required to verify the silt fencing is installed per the Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan. Please contact Becky Chapin, Associate Planner, at 253-835-2641, to schedule the inspection. 2) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall resubmit building permit plans that relocate the house northward per the Adzhigiry Reasonable Use Plan Markup Drawing, prepared by Perteet. 3) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the wetland buffer boundaries and split rail fence location established by the final Reasonable Use Plan shall be reflected on all applicable building permit plans. 4) Prior to issuance of a building permit, a revised geotech report that accurately depicts the 100- foot wetland buffer is required. A letter by the geotechnical engineer stating that they have reviewed the building plans and that they meet the intent of the geotechnical report must also be submitted. 5) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the building plans shall include a storm drainage system that conforms to storm drainage regulations that are in effect at the time the building permit application is submitted. The storm drainage plan shall be provided to King County Health Department for review in conjunction with the septic system review. The final drainage plan shall be approved by both City of Federal Way and King County Health Department. 6) Prior to issuance of the building permit, one of the following must be submitted to the City: a. A letter from King County Public Health that states the septic approval has been extended and is still valid and acknowledgement of the approved buffer width of 100 feet, or b. The applicant must obtain and submit new King County Public Health approval for the septic system based on plans that include the approved 100-foot wetland buffer. 16-1001_0i-00-Up Doc I D 7i�5; • /`) \N1 Mr. Adzhigircy March 28. 2017 Page 3 7) Prior to issuance of the building permit, an updated Certificate of Water Availability, verifying connection to water services from 28"' Avenue SW, is required. 8) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the split rail fence and signage every 150 feet must be installed. A final inspection by the Planning Division is required to verify the split rail fence and signage is installed per the Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan. Please contact Becky Chapin, Associate Planner, at 253-835-26411 to schedule the inspection. 9) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant must record with King County Recorder's Office, a restrictive covenant prepared by the City. The covenant will state that no land surface modification may take place and no structure or improvement may be located in the wetland buffer. BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE REQUIRED This Process III land use decision does not constitute building permit approval, or authorize clearing/grading activities. The associated single-family building permit application for the new house, File #14-100487-00-SF, is still under review by City staff. As conditioned above, revised building permit plans are required to be resubmitted for review and approval. If you have any questions regarding the building permit review, please contact the Permit Center at 253-835-2607, or perm itcenter@cityoffederalway.com. APPROVAL DURATION Per FWRC 19.15.100(2), unless modified or appealed, the Process IiI decision is valid for a period of five years from the effective date of the decision. Time extensions to the decision may be requested prior to the lapse of approval following the provisions listed in FWRC 19.15.110. The improvements must be substantially completed within the five-year time period, or the land use decision becomes void. APPEALS Per FWRC 19.05.360, the effective date of issuance is three calendar days following the date of this letter, or March 31, 2017. Pursuant to FWRC 19.65.120(1), this land use decision may be appealed by the applicant, any person who submitted written comments or information, or any person who has specifically requested a copy of the decision. In compliance with FWRC 19.65.120(2), any appeals must be in the fonn of a letter delivered to the Department of Community Development, with the established fee, and within 14 calendar days after the effective date of the decision, or April 14, 2017. The appeal letter must contain a clear reference to the matter being appealed and a statement of the factual findings and conclusions of the Director of Community Development disputed by the person filing the appeal. The Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hear any appeals of the Process III decision. PROPERTY TAX VALUATION Per FWRC 19.65.100(4)(i), affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes, notwithstanding any program of revaluation. 16- 1 00205-00-U P Doc I D. 75�i; Mr. Adzhigirey March 28. 2017 Page 4 CLOSING This decision does not constitute building permit approval, and it does not waive compliance with fixture City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Becky Chapin, Associate Planner, at 253-835- 2641 or becky.chapin@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Brian Davis Director of Community Development enc: Exhibit A. Findings for Project Approval Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan Markup Drawings, prepared by Perteel, Inc. c: Vince Chaijaroen, 30427 281h Avenue SW- Federal Way, WA 98023 Dean & .Joyce Condos, 30444 28`' Avenue SW- Federal Way, WA 98023 Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner Ann Dower; Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer I6-100205-004UP Doc I D 75553 WY OF Federal Way EXHIBIT A FINDINGS FOR PROJECT APPROVAL Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.65, "Process III Project Approval" Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Request File #16-100205-00-UP The Director of Community Development hereby makes the following findings pursuant to content requirements of the Process III written decision as set forth in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.65.100(4) and 19.150.0401. These findings are based on review of existing City documents, recommendations from the City's wetland consultant, Perteet Inc., and items submitted by the applicant and received January 14, 2016, July 8, 2016, August 5, 2016, November 30, 2016, and January 4, 2017. 1. Proposal — The applicant is proposing a new single family residence, driveway, infiltration trench, utility connections, and on -site septic system on parcel #416660-0600. Impacts to the wetland buffer are unavoidable as the wetland and buffer occupy the entire parcel. The total proposed permanent buffer impact is .10,232 sq. ft. Utility service, gas, and water will connect to 28°i Avenue SW. 2. Site Condition — The 1.03-acre site is vacant with a forested plant community. The site contains medium to relatively steep slopes with an approximate 30 feet of elevation change from front to back. The subject site is a trapezoidal shape bordering Dash Point Road to the west and 28"' Avenue South to the east. The site slopes primarily between 7 and 40 percent. From Dash Point Road, up to the property, the slopes are about 65 percent. The entire lot is encumbered by a wetland and associated wetland buffer. 3. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan — Zoning for the subject site is Residential Single -Family (RS 15.0). Construction of a detached dwelling unit is a pennitted use in this zone subject to the provisions of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.200.010. The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) designation for the subject site is Single Family — Medium Density. 4. Review Process — The wetland buffer intrusion is subject to 'Reasonable Use of the Subject Property, ' reviewed under Process III, Project Approval. The Director of Community Development makes a written decision on the application based on the criteria listed under FWRC 19.150.040 and 19.65.100. 5. Public Notice and Comment — The application was deemed complete on February 4, 2016, and a Notice of Application was posted on February 12, 2016. The notice was posted at the subject property, posted at each of the city's official notification boards, published in the Federal Way Mirror, and mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. The comment period concluded on February 29, 2016. One comment letter and one request to be a party of record were received. The applicant resubmitted a revised reasonable use plan which resolved many of staff s technical comments, including location of water and sewer lines within the wetland, direct wetland impacts, and In June 201 5_ the City updated the Critical Areas code. However. the project is vested to the code in effect at the time the building permit application is deemed complete, January 30, 2014. As such, this Reasonable Use request has been reviewed using 2014. FWRC Division V. Critical Areas (FWRC Chapters 19.145-19.185.) property line concerns. Remaining concerns regarding the infiltration trenches and retaining wall will be addressed during building permit review. A copy of the decision shall be mailed to all interested parties. 6. Environmental Review —The application is exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) as it does not exceed city adopted flexible thresholds set forth in FWRC 14.15.030(a) for construction of residential structures up to twenty dwelling units. No work is planned within the wetlands. Wetland Buffer Intrusion — On January 30, 2014, the applicant applied for a Single Family Building Permit (File #14-100487-00-SF) and was notified that the wetland report provided was outdated and updated report was required. The applicant submitted the Wetland Assessment of the Adzhigirey Property, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, dated May 28, 2014. Per the report, the wetland was delineated and classified as a Category II wetland with a 100-foot buffer. The City forwarded the report to our wetland consultant, Grette Associates, for a peer review. Biologist Chad Wallin prepared a technical memorandum, dated February 12, 2015, in which he stated that the J.S. Jones and Associate report appears to have characterized the wetland and associated buffer accurately. The wetland is a Palustrine Scrub/shrub — Forested wetland, Category II with 100-foot buffer. Based on the plans submitted for the associated single-family building permit under review, the entire house footprint would be located in the wetland buffer. Ordinarily, the next step would be to request a reduction of the wetland buffer in accordance with Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.175.040(5). However, the maximum reduction allowed under that section is 50% and the proposed house improvements would intrude more than that. Therefore, pursuant to FWRC 19.150.040, Reasonable use of the subject property, the applicant requested a modification to the buffer requirements to allow "reasonable use" of the property. On January 14, 2016, the applicant submitted a Process III Master Land Use (MLU) application that included a Wetland Assessment and Buffer Restoration Plan, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc., to minimize the impacts to the wetland buffer. The City forwarded the plan to our wetland consultant, Perteet Inc., for peer review. Senior Ecologist Bill Kidder, conducted a site visit with the applicant and prepared a technical memo, dated September 5, 2016, in which several revisions to the plan were required. The applicant resubmitted the Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan on January 4, 2017. Perteet provided the City with final recommendations which are described below and incorporated into the conditions of approval. Perteet recommends an alternative site layout to minimize the size and extent of impervious improvements within the 100-foot wetland buffer. The dwelling unit shall be moved, in its currently proposed layout and orientation, northward and about eight feet west into the outer 50 percent of the wetland buffer, per the enclosed markup drawing, prepared by Perteet. Moving the house footprint would avoid additional cutting into slopes on the east side of the dwelling unit while avoiding removal of two large maple trees. Utilities as currently proposed would still run east from the southeast corner of the dwelling unit to the 28"' Ave SW right-of-way. In addition, repositioning the house allows the stormwater infiltration trenches to be relocated further north on the subject property along a consistent elevation line at least 50 feet away from the wetland boundary and avoids removing trees. The infiltration trenches would continue to be situated downslope of the dwelling unit and operate on gravity feed. Findings for Project Approval File # 16-100205-00-UP/Doc. I.D. 74919 Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Request Page 2 A physical barrier must be erected for the duration of construction to prevent construction related runoff and erosion. Temporary construction fencing containing silt -screening fabric meeting King County Surface Water Manual (KCSWM) standards must be installed prior to and for the duration of construction. A permanent fence with signage every 150 feet, as depicted in the Reasonable Use Plan, must be instated to identify critical areas and critical area buffers. The proposed fencing location gives the applicant reasonable allowance for yard space around the dwelling unit while maintaining at least a 25- foot minimum buffer width. Perteet's recommendations use the Reasonable Use Plan proposal while striving to minimize the applicant's necessary site design changes to minimize the critical area buffer impacts to obtain some reasonable use of the subject property. Reasonable Use a the Subject Pro ert — Pursuant to FWRC 19.150.040, the city may approve a modification or waiver of the requirements of FWRC Division V. Critical Areas on a case -by -case basis based on the following criteria: (a) The application of the provisions of this division eliminates all reasonable use of the subject property. Staff Response: The site is entirely encumbered by either a wetland or wetland buffer. Per FWRC 19.175.040(5), any improvement can only intrude 50% into the buffer, which is not possible in this situation. In order to gain reasonable use of the property and develop a single family residence, the house must intrude into the wetland buffer. The proposed improvements are all of a reasonable size and scale, and as conditioned, designed to minimize impacts to critical areas. The applicant's proposal includes design and construction of a new on -site sewage disposal system in accordance with current Health Department standards. Therefore, as proposed, this criterion is met. (b) It is solely the implementation of this division, and not other factors, which precludes all reasonable use of the subject property. Staff Response: It's the wetland and its buffer that preclude reasonable use of this property and not any other factors. This criterion is met. (c) The applicant has in no way created or exacerbated the condition which forms the limitation on the use of the subject property, nor in any way contributed to such limitation. Staff Response: The applicant bought the land in its current condition and has in no way created or exacerbated the conditions. This criterion is met. (d) The knowledge of the applicant of limitations on the subject property when he or she acquired the subject property. Staff Response: The applicant was made aware of the wetland and associated buffer after a single- family building permit was submitted to the city for review. This criterion is met. (e) The waiver or modification will not lead to, create, nor significantly increase the risk of injury or death to any person or damage to improvements on or off the subject property. Findings for Project Approval Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Request File #16-100205-00-UP/Doc. I.D. 74919 Page 3 Staff Response: Construction of the site in accordance with final storm drainage, grading, and erosion control plans, subject to City review and approval, will ensure the proposal will not result in detrimental impacts to any other property. As conditioned, the proposal includes implementation of several mitigation elements within the buffer. No increased impacts to health, safety, or welfare of neighboring property are anticipated. This criterion is met. Geologically Hazardous Area — The subject property is in an area identified as being geologically hazardous (landslide hazard area). A Geotechnical Report, prepared by George Gergis, P.E, dated November 11, 2015, has been submitted for review. The report depicts an inaccurate wetland buffer. Prior to approval of the building permit application, a revised geotechnical report that depicts the correct wetland buffer is required. A letter by the geotechnical engineer stating that they have reviewed the building plans and that they meet the intent of the geotechnical report must also be submitted. Storm Drainage System — The location of the infiltration trenches have not been approved as part of the Reasonable Use Request. The building plans must include a storm drainage system that conforms to storm drainage regulations that are in effect at the time the building permit application was submitted. The storm drainage plan shall be provided to King County Health Department for review in conjunction with the septic system review. The final drainage plan shall be approved by both City of Federal Way and King County Health Department. 10. Water and On -Site Septic System — The applicant proposes to serve the single family lot with a public water supply managed by Tacoma Water. The Certificate of Water Availability indicates Tacoma Water's capacity to serve the proposed house by direct connection to approved, existing water main. The nearest water main is located along SW Dash Point Road; however, plans depict access from 28°i Avenue SW. The applicant is required to obtain an up-to-date Certificate of Water Availability verifying connection to 28"' Avenue SW is still an option. The applicant proposed to serve the single family lot with an on -site septic system. King County Public Health approved the on -site septic system on August 28, 2014, and is valid for two years. However, the approved septic plan depicts an inaccurate wetland buffer. Prior to approval of the building permit application, one of the following must be submitted to the City: a) A letter from King County Public Health that states the septic approval has been extended and is still valid and acknowledgement of the approved buffer width of 100 feet, or b) The applicant must obtain and submit new King County Public Health approval for the septic system based on plans that include the approved 100-foot wetland buffer. 11. Conditions of Approval — Based on the criteria above, recommendations provided by Perteet, and the Reasonable Use Plan, the proposed intrusion is approved with conditions: 1) Prior to, and for the duration of, construction activity, the applicant must install temporary construction fencing containing silt screening fabric. A preconstruction inspection by the Planning Division is required to verify the silt fencing is installed per the Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan. Please contact Becky Chapin, Associate Planner, at 253-835-2641, to schedule the inspection. 2) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall resubmit building permit plans that relocate the house northward per the Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan Markup Drawing, prepared by Perteet. Findinas for Project Approval File #16-100205-00-UP/Doc. I.D. 74919 Adzhiairey Reasonable Use Request Page 4 3) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the wetland buffer boundaries and split rail fence location established by the final Reasonable Use Plan shall be reflected on all applicable building permit plans. 4) Prior to issuance of a building permit, a revised geotech report that accurately depicts the 100- foot wetland buffer is required. A letter by the geotechnical engineer stating that they have reviewed the building plans and that they meet the intent of the geotechnical report must also be submitted. 5) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the building plans shall include a storm drainage system that conforms to storm drainage regulations that are in effect at the time the building pen -nit application is submitted. The storm drainage plan shall be provided to King County Health Department for review in conjunction with the septic system review. The final drainage plan shall be approved by both City of Federal Way and King County Health Department. 6) Prior to issuance of the building permit, one of the following must be submitted to the City: a. A letter frotn King County Public Health that states the septic approval has been extended and is still valid and acknowledgement of the approved buffer width of 100 feet, or b. The applicant must obtain and submit new King County Public Health approval for the septic system based on plans that include the approved 100-foot wetland buffer. 7) Prior to issuance of the building permit, an updated Certificate of Water Availability, verifying connection to water services from 28"' Avenue SW, is required. 8) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the split rail fence and signage every 150 feet must be installed. A final inspection by the Planning Division is required to verify the split rail fence and signage is installed per the Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan. Please contact Becky Chapin, Associate Planner, at 253-835-2641, to schedule the inspection. 9) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant must record with King County Recorder's Office, a restrictive covenant prepared by the City. The covenant will state that no land surface modification may take place and no structure or improvement may be located in the wetland buffer. 12. As conditioned, the proposed Reasonable Use Plan and application attachments have been determined to be consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, all applicable provisions of the FWRC, and all other applicable City regulations. The proposed development is consistent with FWRC Chapter 19.65, Process III - Project Approval, and FWRC 19.150.040, Reasonable Use of the Subject Property. Final construction drawings will be reviewed for compliance with specific regulations, conditions of approval, and other applicable City requirements. This decision shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. Prepared by: Becky Chapin, Associate Planner Findings for Project Approval Adzhigirev Reasonable Use Request Date: March 24, 2017 File # 16-100205-00-UP/Doc. I.D. 74919 1'age 5 Memorandum Perteet To: Becky Chapin, Associate Planner, City of Federal Way From: Jason Walker, PLA, PWS, Environmental Manager and Wetland Ecologist, Perteet Bill Kidder, PWS, Lead Ecologist, Perteet Date: September 5, 2016 Re: Adzhigirey Property —Critical Areas Reasonable Use Plan Review PROJECT DESCRIPTION Perteet Inc. conducted a Reasonable Use Plan review of the Adzhigirey parcel application that encroaches on critical areas and critical area buffers. The parcel (# 416660-0600) is located at 30523 281h Ave SW, Federal Way, Washington in the NW quarter of Section 12, Township 21 North, Range 03 East. The parcel is bordered by 281h Ave SW on the east, Dash Point Road on the west, and vacant parcels to the north and south. The applicant is proposing to construct one single family residence with septic field and stormwater infiltration trenches on the east and north sides of the parcel. Driveway access would occur from 28`h Ave SW at the northeast corner of the parcel. The applicant submitted a Reasonable Use Plan for city review pursuant to the Federal Way Code. DOCUMENTS REVIEWED The following documents and resource information websites were reviewed by Perteet prior to the site visit: ■ Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan - Buffer Averaging and Buffer Restoration Plan, dated August 10, 2015, Prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc Environmental Consultants, Prepared for Aleksandr Adzhigirey. ■ Wetland Assessment of the Adzhigirey Property 30XXX 28`h Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98023, Prepared for Sergey Adzhigirey, Prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc, dated May 28, 2014. • King County Online Parcel Viewer (htt www.k' cut . ov ration GIS a iMAP.as x), accessed August 16, 2016. • City of Federal Way Critical Areas map (http://wwwcityoffederalway.com/oaize/maDs), accessed August 16, 2016. • City of Federal Way Municipal Code (http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/FederalWay/) • Google Earth Pro The May 28, 2014 Wetland Assessment of one category II palustrine forested wetland was reviewed, approved, and vested by the City of Federal Way under prior code. That code called for a 100 foot buffer surrounding the wetland perimeter. The wetland and buffer encompass nearly the whole of the Adzhigirey property. A Reasonable Use Plan application was submitted to the City requesting development opportunity on a small portion of the subject parcel consistent with City code. SITE VISIT AND GENERAL OBSERVATIONS A Perteet ecologist completed a site visit on August 17, 2016 to assess site conditions and reasonable impacts proposed by the applicant's Reasonable Use Plan. Alexandr Adzhigirey, the property owner, met Perteet on site and approximately identified the east property corners. The property's west corner points could not be adequately located and verified as is customary to verify site conditions. However, verification of submitted information was accomplished with reasonable approximation using existing site features and landmarks described in the Reasonable Use Plan. Adzhigirey Parcel — Reasonable Use Plan Review Page I Memorandum Perteet The subject property is undeveloped with multi -story mixed conifer / deciduous forest dominating it and the adjacent parcels to the north and south. Many large old trees are present throughout the subject property that include western red cedars (Thuja plicata), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesi►), big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) and western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla). Invasive and noxious weed species were common in the upland areas throughout the project site, including Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), nightshade (Solanum dulcamara), English holly (Ilex aquilifolium), and to a lesser extent English ivy (Hedera helix). One palustrine forested wetland containing extensive scrub/shrub and emergent understory is present on the west and southeast half of the subject property. This wetland's characteristics and boundary generally conforms to the May 28, 2014 J.S. Jones Wetland Assessment. Skunk cabbage (Lysichiton americanus), a wetland obligate plant, was present throughout the wetland on the subject property. Soils in several locations of the wetland on site were observed to be damp at the soil surface. The wetlands and uplands on the subject property and adjacent properties are present in an unaltered state. No land use alterations, clearing / grading, or other actions that may impact this wetland, the adjacent uplands, or hydrologic flow paths was observed on the subject property or adjacent properties that would affect changes to the size or extent of the city approved 2014 wetland boundary. REVIEW COMMENTS Listed below are our findings along with requested actions in bold type: 1. The wetland boundary depicted on the Reasonable Use Plan is inconsistent with the city -approved and vested May 28, 2014 Wetland Assessment wetland boundary that is consistent to the flagged wetland boundary observed during the site visit and shown in photo figures 1-5. The attached Perteet markup of the Reasonable Use Plan identifies a sampling of the wetland flags found during Perteet's site visit correlated to the topography and location of mapped trees. A selection of photos at the end of this memo illustrate a sampling of the wetland flags located during the site visit that support wetland boundary inconsistencies. Please update and modify the Reasonable Use Plan to include the city -vested 2014 wetland boundary and 100 foot buffers. 2. Depending on the revisions in item 1 above, the proposed dwelling and driveway footprint are situated in an adequate location to minimize critical areas and buffer disturbances. Two clusters of big leaf maple trees, existing mowed grass along 28`h Ave SW, and a large hedge of Himalayan blackberry would need to be impacted. These impacts are reasonable and less than if the dwelling and driveway were located elsewhere on the parcel. Pending the addition of the 2014 wetland boundary to the Reasonable Use Plan, the proposed dwelling and driveway footprint may remain unaltered. 3. The proposed Reasonable Use Plan locates the septic system where many large trees would need to be removed. There was sufficient space east closer to the proposed dwelling and driveway in another relative flat space where fewer trees would be removed. The perc test soil trenches found on -site appear to be of a uniform profile such that moving the septic field eastward would minimize the quantity of large trees removed. Pending the addition of the 2014 wetland boundary to the Reasonable Use Plan, please relocate the septic system to avoid fewer large trees. 4. The infiltration trenches may overlap the 2014 wetland boundary. The infiltration trench also extends onto the property to the south. Pending the addition of the 2014 wetland boundary to the Reasonable Use Plan, please update the infiltration trench locations and avoid potentially adding water to the parcel to the south. 5. The Reasonable Use Plan identifies areas for temporary wetland and buffer impacts along the northwest parcel boundary and along the west parcel boundary. These temporary impacts are not explained in the plan. They do not appear to be related to utilities (accessed from the east via 28`h Ave SW) or construction access needs. The attached markup of the Reasonable Use Plan identifies the two temporary buffer impact areas in question. Explain the need for these impacts or remove them from the Reasonable Use Plan. 6. Please flag the subject parcel's north and south parcel lines so that future reviews can clearly identify the parcel boundaries in the field. Adzhigirey Parcel — Reasonable Use Plan Review Page 2 Memorandum Figure 1. Wetland flag WL1-3 about 5 ft southeast of 27 inch red alder. Looking northwest. re 2. Wetland flag WL1-6 with skunk =7A�, Adzhigirey Parcel — Reasonable Use Plan Review Perteet and moist soils in the background. Looking west southwest. Page 3 ��' � ,�p� � 4 'tip t. �� �F ►! .� l kor Olt - dam• - Y.�� /wOW r� •-�� .�+ \. ��,. Jam• _ •: � �; ir ,fir 4 � � ����. •�. ,i tl .rq 3iv0 CM C M W d co d NC O C Z L C � � N � aoa� a= N Co MM C o vi Z � C a2 N N a- aCQ ` - CO N N z Q Z 0 usld uolleao;sea isuns pus Z do L aTIPPAA.M's—AS`sPURIPM BujGemeAV Jejjns AeJlBlyZp�/ "O'"`w"" 133HS sjuvjjnsuoD jVjU3 >uo.>lnug - •otT sajeioossy pue sgUot •s •f �.T.•��b 1WZ-06L-90ZA960} ' fZ066 tlW6tl14.M'A.M luap j'MS .nv 415 ZEozc w W 31VOS Aer1B1yzPV ipuesmaiv D �n U a wz y j� ap J z ch •- U C M FL co Al � W 0) C H � o c Z L y af(0 N j o �11 C) L c W y � C co Cwo: W Co W z C LL co da> Jt jc N N z Q a3!I13 1 !M M `suceaAS `sP-IaM s;uellnsuoD jmuauiuoziAug •ouZ s:nu!oossv pine Souo f •g • f uL3id uoilL3ro;saa aaune pue BujGejeAV joUng ABJ(614zp" z io z 133HS �+� ,.rr unopwlgnAWWl+ Iter>:-DeemxMoms Ez069 uol6ul4>�M'�Mle+�d'MS'-vLrGzzozE AsiOSiuzow .ipunumeiv -- 3-d" 3NON 3-1vos 9AgdF 5 �" 5 -k 12? 36a 4 S., 2`d gal M 23 9 �§ ng 0vp4l E6g911$ s �� 9= ea i a _s tt on Ao ttip p*� C928i 5 y ea 3 a y� E a § E } i M �69� 3'e SS m xam J. S. Jones aind Assoclaf e8, Inc. WETLAND ASSESSMENT of the Adzhigirey Property 30XXX 28th Ave S.W. Federal Way, WA 98023 Tax Parcel Number: 416660-0600 NW Quarter Section 12, Township 21 N, Range 03E Prepared for: Sergey Adzhigirey 32022 5th Ave. S.W. Federal Way, WA 98023 253-661-3564 Dated: May 28, 2014 Prepared by: Jeffery S. Jones, Certified Professional Wetland Scientist, P O B O X 1 9 0 8 ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON 98027 253-905-5736/j eff.j sj ones@comcast.net RECEIVED JAN 14 2015 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Table of Contents 1.0 Project Description ............................................ 2.0 Site Address, Identification and Directions ....... 3.0 Methodology...................................................... 4.0 General Site Description .................................... 5.0 Vegetation.......................................................... 5.1 Vegetation Methodology ................................. 5.2 Vegetation Results ........................................... 6.0 Hydrology.......................................................... 6.1 Hydrology Methodology .................................. 6.2 Hydrology Results ........................................... 7.0 Soils.................................................................... 7.1 Soils Methodology--.... ............................... 7.2 Soil Series........................................................ 7.3 Soils Results ..................................................... 8.0 Wetland Determination, Ratings, and Buffers... 9.0 Functional Assessment ....................................... 10.0 Impacts ............................................................. 11.0 Authority.......................................................... 12.0 Limitations....................................................... 13.0 References........................................................ 1.0 Vicinity Map ............. 1.0 Plant Indicator Status ...................... ...........................................................1 ...........................................................1 ...........................................................1 ........................................................... 2 ...........................................................2 ...........................................................2 ...........................................................3 ...........................................................4 ...........................................................4 ...........................................................4 ...........................................................4 ...........................................................4 ........................................................... 5 ........................................................... 6 ........................................................... 6 ........................................................... 7 ........................................................... 8 ........................................................... 8 ........................................................... 8 ........................................................... 8 Figures ...................... Tables Attachments Routine Field Data Forms NRCS Soils Map National Wetland Inventory Map Wetland Map ................I .2 May 20I4 i J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. 1.0 Project Description The applicants proposes to construct a single-family home on the subject property. This study was conducted to determine the type and extent of wetlands on or near the subject properties. 2.0 Site Address, Identification, and Directions The property is located at 30XXX 281h Avenue Southwest, Federal Way, Washington, 98023 (see Figure 1.0). The tax parcel number is 416660-0600. The property is located in the northwest quarter of Section 12, Township 21 North, Range 03 East of the Williamette Meridian. Directions to the site from Federal Way's City Hall are as follows: start going out Northwest on 8th Avenue South toward South 334th Street; turn left onto South 333`d Street; turn right onto lst Way South; 1st Way South becomes 1st Avenue South; turn left onto Southwest 3201h Street; turn left onto Southwest Dash Point Road/WA-509; stay straight to go onto 30th Avenue Southwest; turn right onto 28th Avenue Southwest; the property is on the right side of the cul-de-sac. 744 J3 3 i cn PUSET SOUND "' '_ "' N SITE d' Q N SW SW 304TH ST �r� 3 2100 Q ; V) -q; o SW sw 3o6y P N SW N S o tiH PL Zif ons� �.. ST Pp 02045Thamas Bros Maps Figure 1.0 Vicinity Map 3.0 Methodology The wetland assessment and delineation were performed using the 1997 Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (DOE, 1997) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers "Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coastal Region (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010). The Routine Small Area Methodology is "used when the project area is small, plant communities are homogeneous, plant community boundaries are abrupt, and the project is not controversial." The wetland determination was based on the presence of the three criteria for jurisdictional wetlands, hydric soils, wetland hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation. All three criteria must be present in order to classify an area as wetland. May 2014 1 J. S. Jones and Associates, Ltc. The field delineation and data collection were completed on August 1, 2013. The wetland boundaries were marked with consecutively numbered orange flagging. Wetland flags were surveyed by Encompasses Engineer. The assessment included a review of the USDA Soil Conservation Service's Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington (Snyder, et. al., 1973). Wetlands were rated and wetland functions were assessed using the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington developed by the Department of Ecology. 4.0 General Site Description The site is a 1.03-acre parcel with a forested plant community. The parcel is approximately 474.3 feet long and 103.46 feet wide. The property is bordered by undeveloped forested parcel to the north and south, Southwest Dash Point Road is to the west and 281h Avenue Southwest is to the east. The site is in a slope greater than 15% from east to west. The plant community is dominated by big -leaf maple, red alder, Douglas fir, vine maple, Indian plum, stinging nettle, lady fern, sword fern, slough sedge, skunk cabbage, salmonberry, and Himalayan blackberry. The site is in the drainage basin of Dumas Bay in the Central Puget Sound watershed and WRIA 9 (Duwamish-Green). 5.0 Vegetation 5.1 Vegetation Methodology Hydrophytic vegetation has adaptations that allow these species to survive in saturated or inundated environments. These environments are classified according to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin, 1979). The probability of plant species being found in wetland environments is provided by the National Wetland Plant List (COE, 2013). An indicator status was assigned to each species according to its probability of occurring in wetlands (see Table 1). Table 1.0 Plant Indicator Status Indicator Category Symbol Occurrence in Wetlands Obligate Wetland OBL — > 99% Facultative Wetland FACW 67-99% Facultative FAC 34-67% Facultative Upland FACU 1-33% Upland UPL < 1 % Note: FAC W, FAC, and FACU have + and — values to represent species near the wetter end of the spectrum (+) and the drier end of the spectrum (-) (USFWS, 1996). At each sample location, the dominant species were assessed by indicator status to determine if the plant community was predominantly hydrophytic. Rules for determining dominant species were established in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (DOE, 1997). Dominants were determined using the 50/20 rule. Using this rule, percent cover was added by order of descending cover until 50% cover was reached. These species were considered dominants. The next most common species was also included as a dominant if it had over 20% cover. May 2014 2 J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. 5.2 Vegetation Results At sample location 1 (SL-1), the plant community is dominated by Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis, FACU), big -leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum, FACU), Western red cedar (Thuja plicata, FAC), trailing blackberry (Rubus discolor, FACU), and sword fern (Polystichum munitum, FACU). The plant community is non-hydrophytic because less than 50% of the dominant species are FAC, FACW, or OBL (see attached data forms). At SL-2, the plant community is dominated by vine maple (Acer circinatum, FAC), lady fern (Athyrium filix femina, FAC), skunk cabbage (Lysichiton americanum, OBL), common horsetail (Equisitum arvense, FAC), and salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis, FAC). The plant community is hydrophytic because greater than or equal to 50% of the dominant species are FAC, FACW, or OBL (see attached data forms). At SL-3, the plant community is dominated by Western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla, FACU), English ivy (Hedera helix, NL), vine maple (Acer circinatum, FAC), skunk cabbage (Lysichiton americanum, OBL), sword fern (Polystichum munitum, FACU), lady fern (Athyrium filix femina, FAC), and common horsetail (Equisitum arvense, FAC). The plant community is hydrophytic because greater than or equal to 50% of the dominant species are FAC, FACW, or OBL (see attached data forms). 6.0 Hydrology 6.1 Hydrology Methodology The presence of primary and secondary wetland hydrological indicators was determined at each sample location by evaluating a variety of direct and indirect indicators. In addition to direct visual observations, secondary hydrologic indicators were used to infer wetland hydrology. Secondary indicators include oxidized channels (rhizospheres) associated with living roots and rhizomes, water marks on vegetation or fixed objects, drift lines, water -borne sediment deposits, water stained leaves, surface scoured areas, wetland drainage patterns, morphological plant adaptations, and hydric soil characteristics. The Corps of Engineers Regional Supplement has a more stringent standard for hydrology than earlier methodologies. Hydrology indicator A3, observation of saturation at 12 inches or less from the soil surface is primary indicator (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2010). Hydrology must be present 5 out of 10 years or with a greater than 50% probability. 6.2 Hydrology Results SL-1 does not have wetland hydrology. The soil profile is dry to the surface. The water table is not present within the upper 18 inches from the surface. There are no indicators of wetland hydrology. SL-2 has wetland hydrology. The soil profile is saturated and a water table is present at 8 inches below the soil surface. SL-2 is located in a drainage pattern. SL-3 has wetland hydrology. The soil profile is saturated and a water table is present at 12 inches below the soil surface. May 2014 3 J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. 7.0 Soils 7.1 Soils Methodology Hydric soils are soils that are "saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (DOE, 1997)". They are either organic soils (peats and mucks), or are mineral soils that are saturated long enough to produce soil properties associated with a reducing environment. Soils were assessed for organic content and hydric characteristics in 16-18-inch soil pits at each sample location. In Washington State, soil color is the main indicator used to determine if a soil is considered hydric. Soil color immediately below the "A" horizon or at a depth of 10 inches below ground surface was determined using Munsell Soil Color Charts (MacBeth, 2000). Soils that had a one-chroma matrix or a two-chroma matrix with mottles were determined to be hydric. 7.2 Soil Series The on -site soils were mapped by the USDA Soil Conservation Service (SCS) as Indianola fine sand (InQ and Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AkF) (see Figure 2). Indianola and Alderwood are not hydric soils types but they have inclusions of hydric soils in drainages and depressions. 7.3 Soils Results The soil at SL-1 is a non-hydric soil. From 0 to 8 inches, the soil is a brown (10YR 3/2) Indianola sandy loam. From 8 to 16+ inches, the soil is a dark yellowish brown (IOYR 3/3) sandy loam. The soil is non-hydric because it has a three-chroma matrix immediately below the "A" horizon or at ten inches, whichever is shallower (DOE, 1997). The soil at SL-2 is a hydric soil. From 0 to 8 inches, the soil is a black (10YR 2/1) Norma silt loam. From 8 to 16+ inches, the soil is a dark gray (IOYR 4/1) color. The soil is hydric because it is a one chroma, immediately below the "A" horizon or at ten inches, whichever is shallower (DOE, 1997). The soil at SL-3 is a hydric soil. From 0 to 10 inches, the soil is a black (IOYR 2/1) Norma silt loam. From 10 to 16+ inches, the soil is a dark gray (10YR 4/1) color. The soil is hydric because it is a one chroma, immediately below the "A" horizon or at ten inches, whichever is shallower (DOE, 1997). May 2014 4 J. S. Jones and Associates, L1c. 8.0 Wetland Determination, Ratings, and Buffers A wetland was delineated on the subject property (see Wetland Map). Its hydrogeomorphic classification is a slope wetland. The main source of wetland hydrology seepage springs located off -site above the property. The hydric soils have a one chroma matrix with sulfidic odor. The entire wetland is approximately 64,750 square feet including off -site wetland area. The wetland has palustrine scrub/shrub (PSS) and palustrine forested (PFO) classes of vegetation (Cowardin, 1979). Some scrub/shrub areas are dominated by non-native invasives. The wetland is a Category II as defined in the city code, see code text below. The buffer requirement is 100 feet. (b) Category // wetlands are greater than 2,500 square feet in area, do not exhibit the characteristics of Category l wetlands, and meet one of the following criteria: (i) Are contiguous with water bodies or tributaries to water bodies which under normal circumstances contain or support a fish population, including streams where flow is intermittent, or (ii) Are greater than one acre in size in its entirety; or (iii) Are less than or equal to one acre in size in its entirety and have two or more wetland classes, with neither class dominated by nonnative invasive species. (c) Category /// wetlands are greater than Z500 square feet in area and do not exhibit those characteristics of Category / or // wetlands. May 2014 J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. 9.0 Functional Assessment The wetland has potential to perform water quality functions because it has dense, woody, vegetation greater than half of the wetland area that trap sediments and pollutants from surface runoff or groundwater. The opportunity to improve water quality is low because the source of hydrology is seepage springs. Following development of the adjoining parcels, the opportunity to improve water quality will increase. The wetland has potential to perform hydrologic functions by reducing erosion downslope. The dense, uncut, rigid vegetation that covers greater than half of the wetland will help in reducing water velocity during peak flows. The wetland has little capacity to reduce impacts of flooding because it is a sloping wetland. The wetland has potential to provide habitat functions for wildlife. There are special habitat features such as large downed wood debris, standing snags, and water. The wetland has opportunity to provide habitat for wildlife. Portions of the wetland and buffer are relatively undisturbed. Connections to the larger habitat in the watershed are broken by roads and development. 10.0 Impacts Proposed impacts are yet to be determined. Individual site plans have not been developed as of the date of this report. Buffer impacts will be unavoidable. 11.0 Authority This wetland determination is in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the objective of which is to "maintain and restore the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the waters of the United States (DOE, 1997)." Wetlands are "areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas (EPA, 40 CFR 230.3 and CE, 33 CFR 328.3)." 12.0 Limitations Wetland determinations and delineations are not final until approved by regulatory agencies and/or local jurisdictions. J S. Jones and Associates, Inc. does not guarantee acceptance or approval by regulatory agencies, or that any intended use will be achieved. May 2014 6 J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. 13.0 References COE. 2013. National Wetland Plant List. http://wetland_plants.usace.army.mil/ Cowardin, Lewis M. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Jamestown, North Dakota. DOE. 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Publication # 96-94. EPA. 1980. Federal Register 40 CFR Part 230: Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines for Specification of Disposal Sites for Dredged or Fill Material. Vol. 45, No. 249, 85352-85353. US Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. EPA. 1982. Federal Register Title 33: Navigation and Navigable Waters; Chapter II, Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers. Vol. 47, No. 138, p 31810. US Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. Hruby. 2006. Department of Ecology's Wetland Rating Form for Western Washington. MacBeth. 2000. Munsell Soil Color Charts -Revised Washable Edition. 617 Little Britain Road, New Windsor, NY 12553. 10p + 9 charts. Snyder, D.E. 1973. Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-3. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. May 2014 7 J. S. Jones and Associales, Inc. Attachments May 2014 R J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: U �� �� W C't 1 ounty �- J q I I`d� Sampling Date: p Applicant/Owner: State: Ll Sampling Point: - 0� Investigator(s): J Jan a Section, Township, Range: Z Z.® 13 Landfomt (hilislope, terrace, etc.): /L,TcJW— Local relief (concave, convex, none): G� rf Slope Subregion (LRR): NW �cs� eis�S Let: 7. -3 Z a % Long: 22. 3 i(a 61 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: b /q NWI classification: Nd Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes !/ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Noy within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. 2— Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree S ra m (Plot siz :_ ) Cover Species9 Status 2. T� 3. 4. 2 0 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plo s e: I 2, 3, 4. 5. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot] e: Z— ) 1. �fi sns'Y'pt 17 _ Zd� 2. 3, 4, 5. 6, 7. 8. 9, 10. 11. = Total Cover Wood�Vine_Stratum (Plot size: ] 1. /17 2. = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: J (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation _ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% _ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: J Z r/ Profile Description. (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix R dox Features (inches) Color (moisil Color (moist)_ % T ee_ Loe Texture Remark !D L � 'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letion, RM=Reduoed Matrix, CS=Covered or Coaled Sand Grains. �Localion: PL=Pore Lining. tut=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis': _ Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (Al0) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _ Depleted Matrix (173) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No _ HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indite ors fminimurn of one required: check all that apply) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) _ Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (B11) _ Water Marks (81) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Sediment Deposits (62) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No /,- Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No IfDepth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No _�sDepth (inches): gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) Drainage Patterns (1310) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Geomorphic Position (D2) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Dns), if available. No I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region J Project/Site: _34 �X • 2_'dt% A-IIe 5 t� Cil bounty: �fX. 4 Sampling Date: i■ I A+- Applicant/Owner: 1 Sta e: � Sampling Point: �L Investigator(s): S.I ❑ // Section, Township, Range: � Z Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): / A Local relief (concave, convex, none): _ � rS}a' L11e Slope (%): S Subregion(LRR): A) W S Lat: a, Long:" Z_Z•`3,6 F9 Datum: —�— Soil Map Unit Name: /U O / NWI classification: A�)O Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yesy No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V No within a Wetland? Yes f/ No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: d ) 1a Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 • That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 4. .�gplingl5hrubStratum (Plotsize: _�� = Total Cover 1..e�'Lr 2. 6_Z a -,a 6 6-fx 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot Ize: �i0 = Total Cover 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. = Total Cover Wgodv-Vine Stratum (Plot size: _ 20 1. 2. ` = Total Cover Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Percent of Dominant Species / 0 a That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: _Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (A) (B) (AIB) (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation _ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% _ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0' _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation , / Present? Yes 1- No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: d Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indlcaiors.) Depth Matrix Redox F atures (inches) _ Color '[moist] % Color [moist) % Tvoe, Loc Texture Remarks 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De lefion, RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains- locatlow PL=Pore Linin M=Math Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) . Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil _ Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) J,-'Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matrix (173) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No_ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: PrimpEy InclicaloMminim m of one re ire,4 eck all fhat a I Sec-ond a rV Ind i lcrs 2 or morg na uir Surface Water (At) _ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except _ Water -Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, igh Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 46) �aturalion (A3) _ Salt Crust (B11) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (63) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (132) _ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ FAG -Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks (137) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes t✓ No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes _� No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Recorded Data (stream gauge, monilarrng well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region I Project/Site: a y X � .5 W t,�i ounty: meat! W Sampling Date: _o S f 1%q Applicant/Owner: StSte: ^M' Sampling Point: Investigator(s): ■ O }gam Section, Township, Range: 2 2 / Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 0 Local relief (concave, convex, none): & Slope Subregion (LRR): /U U) jGyeg VT Lat: V7 -3 7— O G� Long: -/Z 2, SL 9Datum: --- Soil Map Unit Name: t9 e- pi�lg NWI classification: /Vc? Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes �No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes L-- No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No --------- Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes 1! No Remarks VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: Cover Species? a u 2. 3. 4. = Sa tin /Shnrb Stratum (Plot size: _ Total Cover ) 2. 3. 4. 5. 0 = Total Cover Herb 5tralum (Plot size: 4-0 ] 1. LC aL 2. ;:� ed,,v-y-.e-_J .01 V . I_{ 3. rl 4.� 5. 6. 7. S. 9. 10. 11. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: Z } 1. 2. = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Kemarks: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: - (A) Total Number of Dominant / Species Across All Strata: 61 (B) Percent of Dominant Species / That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIS) Prevalence index worksheet: Total % Cover of Multioly by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ , - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation _ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% _ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast -Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: ✓LJ� Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix RedQx Feature finches] Calor mois % Color [mois3l 46 7y g' 9c Te� Remarks 'T e: C=Concentration, D=De lelion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. kocalion: PL=Pore tJnin , M-Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (72) f/ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) iydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84) _ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes L-- No HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators 2 or more re fired _ Surface Water (Al) Water Tattle (A2) _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except MLRA _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, _✓High 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B) /Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (B11) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (132) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (133) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Di) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observatlons: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes )/ No Depth (inches): / !i Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No lindadAs cacillmv frinnPA Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes L--" No gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous irspedions), if US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0 z z mry v v OOTZbZS OODZbZS 006TbZ5 008117M OOLTbZS 009TbZ5 OOSTbZS m M „Zbb ,TZ oZZT M.Z,IZ oZZT O O N � "a M „ZE ,ZZ oZZT z R a Z 7 In N O N 8 7 � w C O �U c f+l � �j U�1 ff l' W oo a o b � 3 u v 8 m n ,ti ` N 3 g O O n 0) i+ L m d 7 N 8 z _ C z 0 + M„2E ,ZZ oZZT LJ� z m al i co O m C () O O C) O) KM C � w N N C - — C y O y a) O w 7 to M f0 O O O a) = N m LO m N > En N O U7 a) O U U y U y a3 N a) a �? Q I a) y 3 C d O V C C U U U n O) - C6 L d y p y O y 7 C 0 0. a U 1° �' E V) N a)a y E CL)_N w m N o N c x E a) d c 7° a C U y N a 7 c o m _ U o m E �/1 Z O M E m a) U a7 O_ a) a) .p, a N a0 M a) w N O N y 7 U) (� O1 L E 7 L O a) y ° y o a E m° y L Z T y° C L 2 0 6 z Z m y o ° ... L E Q 3 w O C E O y E a U) r 7 d y W a a) y y a ` =O j N in O •p U p d O a) .n L V )n a) a C U) O (D U M L 3` fa C y a) O ^/ LOL j a U E y E 3 W � 0 � L O y N p m a) = Q a) N Ol O Q n ,� a o T m a) a) p C O ° °°° 3 n3 w o m w 0 C N $ m° C,,' E >' y +L' N C C a) L C O a) N a) O. _� C' V a) Z a a7 3 W C N t CL N E Z .O ° L a) V) a) N L U w fn ; U°i a) T .0 O N O IL E C a s O N a a� U y O O. O n" a _> 3 �, CL y Q E y y O J Z� V) y C C a�Q$�a °` m y rn L y C U7 c °�`u t y m c�0M> E �)Er > 9- d m.;W5 rn� iu w E 8:LL c >` OaL� ,LO C y da) T y U a1 �a— n �Q a) Oa : 0 Z U) a) 0 °y >` ��w U) w3�my 0r > `a An tcNa 7 y W a) ` U C fa E N w d ° E O 7 C C Q O 3 C a.0 O d Z Q > O a) O. a)C 0.1 a O) 'C N a) O1 E N O C_ w O a) ' U O y N _ y L7 IpA N C '• N 7 y y a1 a1 U a j L p y C` D_ N U a a) y V) a) _ Z E _ M wd„ O CL N a) O O) E E L N C !n W E n y d E p O O U) U a3 O y _L Cc a a Q U L O H.L.. O 7 U1 U) O V) O a) 0 ❑ N a7 L U .t-- O T a) Z U)) O ZU) C/)w _ a7 O N U) n N -0 o U 0. O C LL U t L CL m c U) N 0 y y cm a c O :zi m m w o m 0 t Z ¢ V) CL E § .O X 0_ 0_ O U) C O cn Z' T O Ul > O N lu co >w .w O i T O a) Z) J a ¢ Q d c 3 Z W Q� ® © LL * R 0 n F- LU y a. Q ¢ C CO al U) C c y O C O (_ J D_ uj n a a) ° On c c n n w D_ n 30 m CL 4) ,_, U) O d >, 3 y o `p LL m O 0 a) m o o o W cf)�, m EL«. o a O CO Q ° f6 LL O �i co T a) a) w tll 7 L al ` a) N C U m N V C A L C y U N W a) Q 0 0 0 Ul U) (n C O '0 m `p (6 m U O 2 al U (9 U' J )a J 2 C 2 y O ^2 0_ O a1 0_ U) la a) C U) U) y '� O U) U) a, a (D m � 7�pC �} Q� 0 q, y U a U) 'o ° o w d � 7 c ++ C a7 O z U Soil Map —King County Area, Washington Map Unit Legend King County Area, Washington (WA633) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI AgB Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes 21.4 22.4% AgC 10.8 11.3% AgD Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes 0.8 0.8% AkF Alderwood and Kitsap soils, very steep InC Indianola loamy fine sand, 4 to 15 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 36.7 38.4% 25.8 27.0% 95.4 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/21 /2014 Page 3 of 3 M � L � to O CL o 2 M o p w iL r_ a m a NC. .�y1 m d o Q- G m U. a W W IL J tv E fY �L =LL m M �L an ❑y R R �1 h �¢o na uEo r. w `oP E 3h v— U E m o `o x `oI— � u `oa — m o .Fi mmyc ``oPz Ec — r y 1 i 1i T cc Z �N N 7 \ gdk 2W a L,,d,veloped 2 AVE SW; ' 7777-1 44�4 cin � Federal Way WETLAND CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM Date: July 28, 2016 City: City of Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Consultant: Jason Walker, Perteet Inc. 2707 Colby Avenue, Suite 900 Everett, WA 98201 425-252-7700 iv, —,,I' Project: Adzhigirey Reasonable Use 30523 28'' Avenue SW, Federal Way Parcel #416660-0600 File No.: 16-100205-00-UP Process III "Reasonable Use" Project Proponent: Sergey Adzhigirey 32022 5`6 Avenue SW Federal Way, WA 98023 206-790-2911 Project Proponent J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc. Wetland Specialist: P.O. Box 1908 Issaquah, WA 98027 253-905-5736 Project Planner: Becky Chapin, Associate Planner 253-835-2641 Documents Y Wetland Assessment, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc., dated June Provided: 5, 2006, revised May 28, 2014, and September 1, 2015. Technical Memorandum, prepared by Grette Associates, dated February 12, 2015 (as background). Drainage Technical Information Report, prepared by Development Engineering, PLLC, dated April 1, 2014 (as background). Adzhigirey-Reasonable-Oise-Plan, prepared by TS:.lones-and-Associates, Inc., dated August 10, 2015 Geotechnical Report, prepared by George Gergis, P.E., dated November 11, 2015 and revised June 28, 2016 (as background). FWRC Division V. Critical Areas. Project Background: The applicant proposes to construct a new single family residence that intrudes into a Category H wetland buffer. A building permit application was submitted in 2014 and the applicant was asked by staff to revise the outdated wetland report. In 2015, the City utilized Grette Associates to conduct peer review of the revised report prepared by the applicant's wetland biologist. Grette concluded that the report appears to have characterized the wetland and associated buffer accurately as a Category 11 wetland with 100-foot buffer. Based on the proposed site plans, the entire house footprint would be located in the wetland buffer. Pursuant to FWRC 19.150.040, Reasonable use of the subject property, the applicant has requested a modification or waiver of the buffer requirements to allow "reasonable use" of the property. Prior to the applicant submitting the Reasonable Use Request, the City amended the Critical Areas Code (June 2015). As such, the applicant was told by staff that they needed to revise the report to meet current codes (see Wetland Assessment, dated September 1, 2015). However, during review process staff realized that the project was vested during the building permit stage and is regulated by the old critical area regulations. The applicant has submitted plans per the approved Category R rating with 100-foot buffer in conjunction with the old code. Based on an email to the applicant, staff concluded that a reasonable size house would be a building footprint up to 1,600 sq. ft., including garage. The driveway or septic system area are not included in the building footprint. The Process III Reasonable Use proposal would be reviewed by the Director at the conclusion of the critical areas review process. Task Scope: This task scope requests the following: Review the submitted documents prepared by J.S. Jones for consistency with the requirements of the previous critical areas code of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC). Code sections referenced have been provided since they are no longer available online. a. FWRC 19.150.040, Reasonable use of the subject property b. FWRC Chapter 19.175, Regulated Wetlands 2. Provide a memorandum identifying additional information requested as necessary. 3. Conduct site visit as necessary. A single site visit is proposed, 4. Provide written technical memorandum(s) regarding the proposal's conformance with FWRC. A single written memo shall be provided that addresses 16-I002U5 scope items 2 and 4 above. D... I.D. 72331 Task Cost: Not to exceed $ 3 , 3 9 0 without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. Acceptance: �F C A sultant — Perteet City of Fede Way Becky Chapin 1� Applicant —Bergey Adzhigirey Date S?�/ LIO Date 'S—Ib Date 16-100205 Doc. ID. 72331 Vince Chaijaroen 30427 28th Ave. S.W. Federal Way, WA 98023 416660-0591-00 416660-0595-00 February 19, 2016 Becky Chapin Associate Planner Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Dear Ms Chapin: First, thank you very much for your time, providing the information regarding Adzhigirey's land use plan. My intention in acquiring this information is by no mean to disrupt or oppose a reasonable construction plan. But due to the impact from any construction next to this wetland is a concern to me. I live in a house nearby for the past seventeen years. The proposed project is merely a hundred feet from my residence. I am also the owner of the property adjacent to Mr. Adzhigirey's property. In regards to the information I viewed at your office, I noticed some inconsistent in the propose land use or construction plan. The following are the questions that I have and would appreciate if you could verify and provide any additional information once it becomes available. There are some differences among the drawings pertain to a particular subject i.e. the building location. This may contribute due to the adjustment in accordance to the wetland and the surrounding regulation, but there is no clarification to confirm which plan revision is to be superseded. • The submitted plan date received, Jan, 14 2016, indicates that the water and sewer lines are to be constructed across the wetland area. The lines start from SW Dash Point Road to the east and up to the proposed site. Would this directly impact the wetland during the construction? • The proposed construction along the north side of the lot, next to the Buffer Impact Area #1- (6,860 sf mark on the map, sheet 1 of 2) is not clearly identified. Note that the `Grinding Pump' indication point in the same proximity with the `Sump W/Solid Lid' and the `Infiltration Trench'. The same area also shows T' Down Spout Solid PVC. Is there available detail of this area? • Does the proposed project plan for public sewer or septic system? Please let me know if there is plan in the submittal plan for clarification. I would rather not assume if the project would utilize one or the other system. • The plan indicates the step retaining wall on the north side to avoid any erosion in the construction area. Is there any indication of detail construction area on the plan? • Due to the abrupt change in the area topography, would this wall be constructed prior to the building construction? • Is there any survey mark/stake along the property line to indicate where the property line start? If so, is there any indication on the plan? Are these marks located on the property? Can they be visibly identified and located in the area? Again, appreciate your time and consideration of my concern on this land use proposal. Further question may arise as the update information available. Sincerely, Vince Chaijaroen Becky Chapin From: Becky Chapin Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 4:21 PM To: 'CJ Rey (cj_rey@hotmail.com)' Subject: Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Update Attachments: 5582087049.pdf Hi Sergey, I was discussing your project with Ann Dower, PW Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer, and we thought it would be best to have a meeting with you and your consultants to discuss some of the comments and concerns we have. If you could arrange for your Wetland Biologist, Jeff Jones, and Geotechnical Engineer, George Gergis, to meet with us here at City Hall that would be great. Here are some issues we would like to discuss: The plans provided are not consistent. Four full-sized sheets were submitted, but they were not numbered consecutively, nor do the designs match throughout. Please number them and make sure every sheet shows the same design, including all utility work and street improvements ■ If work is occurring in the northwest corner of the property, or within SW Dash Point Road, show it on all sheets. It appears, per the buffer averaging and buffer restoration plan Sheet 1, that water connection will be off Dash Point Rd, which will be a significant intrusion into the wetland and wetland buffer. However, Sheet 2 "Goals and Objectives" states that utilities will not be connected to Dash Point Rd. Please verify where the water connection will be coming from. ■ The wetland report doesn't discuss the impacts of the septic system. Based on the submitted plans, it also appears that a sewer line will be crossing the property from Dash Point Rd. However, you submitted a Septic Approval letter. Please clearly identify if you will be utilizing an on -site septic system or connecting to sewer. • If utilizing on -site septic: o An updated approval from King County Public Health is required. The drainfield is now located within a wetland buffer and has moved slightly from what was depicted on the previously approved septic design plans. We will need a letter from Public Health that their approval is still valid for the new septic drainfield location. o The septic system and flow control for roof runoff must be shown on the same plan. Due to steep slopes on this lot, the drainage system must be stamped and signed by a geotechnical engineer. The plans shown in the geotech report is not the same as the lager plans submitted for review, and the geotech report states that the drainage system details are "beyond the scope of this report." As part of the land use review we need to evaluate all impacts to the wetland, including drainage and steep slope impacts. ® It is also worth mentioning that the project should have vested to the code in effect at the time the building permit application was complete. Therefore, my previous comments regarding needed to update to the new critical area codes were incorrect. I apologize, we should have realized that building permits vest projects to all codes in effect at the time. Going forward, you can choose to utilizes the current critical areas code or go back to the critical areas codes. With either code the proposed single family house will still constitute reasonable use of the subject property as the wetland/buffer covers the entire property. We need to discuss which code to use going forward. o Existing Critical Areas Code: Category III wetland with 165-foot buffer o Old Critical Area Code: Category II wetland with 100-foot buffer I've attached Ann's technical comment memo for more detailed comments. Please let me know if your team is able to meet and I will schedule something as soon as possible. We would like to get these issues resolved prior to sending out a technical comment letter. If you have any questions or to set up a time to meet, please feel free to contact me. Best, Becky Chapin Associate Planner Federa I Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253-835-2641 Fax: 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com MEMORANDUM Public Works Department February 9, 2016 Becky Chapin Ann Dower ADZHIGIREY - (16-100205-00-UP) 30523 28TH AVE SW; Development Services has completed a review of the information provided on January 14, 2016. Prior to land use approval, the applicant must complete the following: 1. Existing and proposed contours (as shown on Sheet 1 of 2), both onsite and within the public right-of-way, must be shown on a survey that has been stamped and signed by a surveyor licensed in the State of Washington. 2. Show the location and size of the flow control system for roof/driveway runoff, per the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual KCSWDM Appendix C, on the plans. Due to steep slopes on this lot, the drainage system must be stamped and signed by a geotechnical engineer licensed in the state of Washington. The plan shown in the geotechnical report is not the same as the larger plans submitted for review, and the geotechnical report states that the drainage system details are "beyond the scope of this report", so this requirement from the building permit review has not been satisfied. 3. The septic system and flow control for roof runoff must be shown on the same plan, and submitted to King County Health Department for review and approval. 4. Clearly show work within the public right-of-way on the plans, or obtain a Right -of -Way Modification. 5. Four full-sized sheets were submitted, but they were not numbered consecutively, nor do the designs match throughout. Please number them and make sure every sheet shows the same design, including all utility work and street improvements. 6. Federal Way Revised Code Chapter 19.135.030 requires street improvements on all abutting rights -of -way, including both SW Dash Point Road and 281h Ave SW. A Right -of -Way Modification Request (instructions enclosed) must be submitted if you wish to modify or waive these requirements. If work is occurring in the northwest corner of the property, or within SW Dash Point Road, show it on all sheets. Please indicate on the plans what kind of work is being proposed. If cuts are made in the pavement of Dash Point Road for utility installation, a full -width, 2" grind and overlay will be required. The length and location of the grind and overlay will be determined when a right-of-way permit application for utilities is received. To avoid this, you are advised to bore for utilities or keep construction out of the pavement if at all possible. In addition, the follo ,ving comments must be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit, and are provided as a courtesy to help the applicant complete the plans. 1. Please review Appendix D of the 20109 King County Surface date; Design Manual 6 KCSTVDM) and provide location, details, and calculations for appropriate erosion control measures. Include the list of wet season requirements shown on page D-74 on the plans. Show clearing limits and stockpile locations with cover measures. 2. Show flow control for roof runoff, per Appendix C, KCSWDM. Due to steep slopes on this lot, the final drainage system and the erosion control measures must be reviewed and approved by a geotechnical engineer licensed in the state of Washington. The geotechnical engineer must also recommend when clearing, excavation, and grading should occur based on his/her evaluation of the erosion potential of soils onsite. Provide a detail of the proposed flow co..trol on the plans. ! ,Nic=1 details are sho::m in the 3. a a ovide .. KCSWDM, Appendix C. 4. All utility connections must be made underground. 5. Clearly identify any work being done on Dash Point Road. if utilities are being installed on Dash Point Road, the applicant will be required to provide, at a minimum, erosion control and permanent stabilization plans. If work will include cutting the pavement, a full roadway width, 2" grind and overlay will be required for the length of the pavement cut. 6. The following information must be provided for required frontage improvements: o A plan showing culvert, ditch, storm pipe, or other drainage features required to convey road runoff safely to the nearest existing drainage ditch. o Cross -sections representative of the road design. o A plan showing the finished grade elevations along centerline of the new segrrient of roadway. o The public right -of --way location and elevations must be shown accurately, with a survey. Right-of-way dedication may be required. 7. Utility work within the public right-of-way will require a right-of-way permit. Please contact the right-of-way permit desk at 253-835-2725. 8. All drawings must be stamped by a Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Washington. www.federalw v 6aderal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LANE} USE APPLICATION Proocl Name: Adthigirey Welland Buffer Intrusidn Project Description: Through a 'Process III' land use review for reasonable use of the subject prop- e(ty, the applicant proposes to intrude into a regu- latetl Welland IB- fam ly housetlbuffer Thepro tposal includes a Wellano construct a new �dgAs- sessment and Buffer Restoraunn Pawn, preparad by J.S. Jones and Associates. Inc., to minlmize the impacts to the wetland buffer. Applicant: Sergey Adzhigirey, 206.790.2911 Project Lacetlon: Near the Itersectlon of 301h Ave- nue SW and 28th Avenue SW, Federal Way. Parcel#416660.0600 Date Application Received: January 14.2016 Date Determined Complete: February 4, 2016 Dale of Notice of Application: February 12, 2016 Comment Due Dale: February 29. 2916 16- 100205 OR UP) and BuI dingermits Under Reiew: Useocess Pemitl (IFille 14- 100487-00-SFj Existing Environmental Documents: Welland As- sessmanL prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates. Inc. dated September 1, 2015, Watland Assess- ment, prepared by J.S. Janes and Associates, Inc. dared May 28, 2014, Adrhigiry Buller Averaging and Buffer Restoration Plan, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates. Ins. dated August 10. 2015, Geotechnlcal Report, prepared by George Gergis, P.E., dated November 1 t, 2015. Development Regulations Used tot Prefect MRiga- thm: federal Way Revised Coda (FWRC) Title 16 "Surface Water Management,and Title 19 'Zoning and Development Cods.' Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may sub- mit written comments regarding the application to the p.m �on Flebruary 29, 2016. Only oi at Community epersons who sbo mh written comments to the direcW (address be- low) of specifically request a copy at the declslon, may appeal the decision_ Details of appeal proce- dure& for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Availability of Fdo: The 011iclal protect file and en• vlrorm entai documents are evallable for public re- view during normal business hours at the Depart- ment of Community Development (33325 BihAvenue South, Federal Way, WA WM). City Stall Conlact; Becky Chapin, Associate Plan - net. 253-836-2641, besky.chapin+9ralyof4ederalway.cvm Published in the Federal Way Mirror February 12, 2016. FWM 2317 � 1 I 31919111 Ave S, Suite 101 Federal, Way, WA 98003 1 253.925.5565 1253.925.5750 (f) Affidavit of Publication Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained by the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way - Community Development as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 12th day of February 2016, and ending on the 12th day of February 2016 , both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $103.82, which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.020. Subscribed to and sworn before me this 25th day of March 2016. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Buckley ��'F0-'? 1. 1 A IV ER A R�o''rf, i NOTARY z PUBLIC �A WASH\ ����1111111�1e 41k FederalOF Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www,citvoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Was +n to ,tat a: O� Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ Other was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2016. ,Z Project Name �i� � � V" 4 U5) COY / File Number(s) Signature Date . f /o, J K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 12/18/2015 1:48:00 PM Posted Sites: Federal Way City Hall: 33325 8th Ave South Federal Way Library: 34200 1 st Way South Federal Way 320th Library: 848 S. 320th St K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 12/18/2015 1:48:00 PM i CITY OF ti Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Adzhigirey Wetland Buffer Intrusion Project Description: Through a `Process 111' land use review for reasonable use of the subject property, the applicant proposes to intrude into a regulated wetland buffer to construct a new single-family house. The proposal includes a Wetland Assessment and 1_�N Buffer Restoration Plan, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc., to minimize the impacts to the wetland buffer.' - Applicant: Sergey Adzhigi.rey, 206-790-2911 Project Location: Near the intersection of 30"' Avenue SW and 28"' Avenue SW, Federal Way. Parcel #416660-0600 Date Application Received: January 14, 2016 Date Determined Complete: February 4, 2016 Date of Notice of Application: February 12, 2016 Comment Due Date: February 29, 2016 V� SW 3041TH ST SITE _ +n ' N �c { v) .f r r> CV .a SW 00 ¢ 5W SIB 30 6T-/, Pl z N SW N ST • KPC:u TncrT3S 9•u' Mal'. Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File 16-100205-00-UP) and Building Permit (File 14-100487- 00-SF) Existing Environmental Documents: Wetland Assessment, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc. dated September 1, 2015, Wetland Assessment, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc. dated May 28, 2014, Adzhigiry Buffer Averaging and Buffer Restoration Plan, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc. dated August 10, 2015, Geotechnical Report, prepared by George Gergis, P.E., dated November 11, 2015. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19 "Zoning and Development Code." Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments regarding the application to the Director of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on February 29, 2016. Only persons who submit written comments to the director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Availability of File: The official project file and environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Department of Community Development (33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003). City Staff Contact: Becky Chapin, Associate Planner, 253-835-2641, beck y.cha in.�cityoffedeumlway.con3 Published in the Federal Way Mirror February 12, 2016. Doc I o 64679 11 A%S%%00-0'� CITY OF Federal '"flay DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cltyoffederalwav cor11 DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: P Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significarice (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter, ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was 0 mailed ❑ faxed A e-mailed and/or 0 posted to or at each of the attached addresses on --VtL 1 , 201 Project Name + W File Number(s) - 5- Signature Date t19 -J-016 - K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /8/2015 10:07:00 AM Tamara Fix From: Jennifer Anderson <Anderson@fedwaymirror.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 9:45 AM To: Tamara Fix Subject: Re: Adzhigirey Legal Notice Got it, thanks! Jennifer Anderson Advertising Sales Consultant Direct: 253-946-2890 Internal: 35602 Fax: 253-925-5750 31919 1st Ave S, Ste 101, Federal Way, WA 98003 Sound Publishing Map Print Rates Online Rates Media Kit Sound tnro On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Tamara Fix <Tamara.Fix @cit offederalway.coin> wrote: Please publish the following legal notice (Adzhigirey NOA, 16-100205) in Friday's (Feb. 12, 2016) issue. Please confirm and issue an affidavit of publication. -1k CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Adzhigirey Wetland Buffer Intrusion t, 1 Project Description: Through a `Process III' land use review for reasonable use of the subject property, the applicant proposes to intrude into a regulated wetland buffer to construct a new single-family house. The proposal includes a Wetland Assessment and Buffer Restoration Plan, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc., to minimize the impacts to the wetland buffer. Applicant: Sergey Adzhigirey, 206-790-2911 Project Location: Near the intersection of 30th Avenue SW and 28th Avenue SW, Federal Way. Parcel #416660-0600 Date Application Received: January 14, 2016 Date Determined Complete: February 4, 2016 Date of Notice of Application: February 12, 2016 Comment Due Date: February 29, 2016 Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File 16-100205-00-UP) and Building Permit (File 14-100487-00-SF) Existing Environmental Documents: Wetland Assessment, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc. dated September 1, 2015, Wetland Assessment, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc. dated May 28, 2014, Adzhigiry Buffer Averaging and Buffer Restoration Plan, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc. dated August 10, 2015, Geotechnical Report, prepared by George Gergis, P.E., dated November 11, 2015. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19 "Zoning and Development Code." Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments regarding the application to the Director of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on February 29, 2016. Only persons who submit written comments to the director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. l� 1 Availability of File: The official project file and environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Department of Community Development (33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003). City Staff Contact: Becky Chapin, Associate Planner, 253-835-2641, beck .cha in rr.cit offederalwa .cam Published in the Federal Way Mirror February 12, 2016. Tamara Fix Administrative Assistant Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2602 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.citvoffederalwa .com 3 CIT Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.city,Qffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ;I Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significarce (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Pemit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was Xmailed 0 faxed 0 e-mailed and/or 0 posted to or at each of -the attached addresses on 1 20116. Project Name File Number(s) _� -iD b�--) 6 , Signature Date J-P - 116 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /8/2015 10:07:00 AM -: CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Adzhigirey Wetland Buffer Intrusion Project Description: Through a `Process 11I' land use review for reasonable use of the subject property, the applicant proposes to intrude into a regulated wetland buffer to construct a new single-family house. The proposal includes a Wetland Assessment and 5v� ' o =0 Buffer Restoration an, prepared y J.S. Jones CC :3C Associates, Inc., to miniimi e the imp cts to thend Y5111 �L 0 wetland buffer. ¢ a4 Applicant: Sergey Adzhigirey, 206-790-2911 Project Location: Near the intersection of 30`' Avenue SW and 28`" Avenue SW, Federal Way. Parcel #416660-0600 Date Application Received: January 14, 2016 Date Determined Complete: February 4, 2016 Date of Notice of Application: February 12, 2016 Comment Due Date: February 29, 2016 ., = Cn �0 5 9G �` FSITE ; - cv a � `�' SW SW 304TH ST dry 2100 a CM SW SW 34-6Ty Pl x OFC1 N 1 . N . SW SR ��� Q1 3o8rH �I �� an Sr @2005Thomas Bros. MaaE Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File 16-100205-00-UP) and Building Permit (File 14-100487- 00-SF) Existing Environmental Documents: Wetland Assessment, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc. dated September 1, 2015, Wetland Assessment, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc. dated May 28, 2014, Adzhigiry Buffer Averaging and Buffer Restoration Plan, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc. dated August 10, 2015, Geotechnical Report, prepared by George Gergis, P.E., dated November 11, 2015. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19 "Zoning and Development Code." Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments regarding the application to the Director of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on February 29, 2016. Only persons who submit written comments to the director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Availability of File: The official project file and environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Department of Community Development (33325 8`i' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003). City Staff Contact: Becky Chapin, Associate Planner, 253-835-2641, becky.chapin@cftyoffederalway.co citvoffederalway.co>n Published in the Federal Way Mirror February 12, 2016. Doc. I.D. 64679 City of Federal Way 30v' Parcel Notification area .� 41$714 416660. 03ss 4te74R 4t666¢ 036s 4e864 4I&M. 0215 �3a 0370 03G5 416mo- 476710. 418776 a1�66 0405 Dfi0. �� 0145 416710. 416710. t1x40 d 416860. 41 vto. 4 w6R MI �52703 0155 0237 U375 G3B1 D391 90717 41677R 416660. 012109- 407750. WM 40M 01 j 9058 0 IMI s?r 416860- 9M sk 0450 °�664E1p. 012103- 416710. 41671R 1i 0275 Was063 1 9 - 7 1g1l� 41671R j 0195 0470 I 012103- 4le7t0. 416680. 416660. Os2103-�. 012ip3 02R5 416710. 0471 0460 416660 110� 9M DDOS1`��, 41666o- 41671R y 0472 WE) 01216} 0075 416710• Y� 416860. 017103 g�.,y 0txlpy. 416710• dS OV7 j arx703- ON yT "6660• 47� y5{1 416650• Ot z103- Slog 4pi35 {1477 0465 9056 416680 q r•,y,� 012103. sit alp7ta �r. 4174 g16'666 ONO.Y 0N5 0466 4r•J ^_T 012103. Q032703• 416:10• 416680. 0}2703 0000 0475 A16660. f" 9a62 901e 411477. 0157 0467 4 0721039076 11121DE- 0130 416660. 9116 0476 g16B60. �2109• Y105 06 SW 304TH ST 416660- _ 0647 J a16fis& 661350. 0011 122103- 9009 167300- TRCT IN" UtZaH 122103 9105 Lakehaven Treatment 122103- 9167 center (Lakota) 167300. 16730P 167300. 11101 %"-,W 15730R D76D 0�0167300• woo 0670 t>62o 0740 0780 167300. 16730D- 167300- SW 3O9TH ST OW 157300. TRCT 0900 0630 767300. 567a04 3 6500 1673 &O470 167300.t 3 1MON 167300. DRIG 0460 6 ow 0880 t�10 M04Z 16 187300. le73o0. OnG 0 767300. 0M0 caw 1673110• 767'.AO- 167300. f67700. 0530 I�h 0520 CG40 1,30R 10490 l7 p 6p 0890 D550 January 2016 City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S. Federal Way Wa. 98003 (206) - 835 - 7000 www.cityoffederalway.com 012103- 9047 4 a �0 47fi660. 0648 416660. 0645 4I666Q ow �T6 4 41620 66g7 OKI I 416560. 4 0595 116660- 0600 1 416660. 0605 IPA 416660. 0608 4 L7s' 416660 0610 rfl 416660. 0615 416660- 0620 416660 0625 416660. 0640 167300- TRCT 16730\\ TRCT 416660- 416660. 416666 416660. 0654 0853 0652 0655 12103-I 9008 0110 893760. 0120 893760. On 6a7760. 0140 1 V50- 0150 ea376 . I 0160 0170 01Bo om 110920. 0270 889424 0260 11a"20. 0250 889420- D240 416660. 416MO- 41 B680. 8"420- 0657 05w G650 am �a 416660- 416660 M9620' 416660 0659 0658 47710 0661 889420- 0200 416730. 416660. 1311 0670 416660. 0100 0674 410560. 416660 3: 0671 0673 173 47 a 0200 4107T 416660 H 0160 D675 41666O 416660 0180 0676 0677 416770- 0170 4767 SW 3M-M 01T 0150 416 iF +3t40 122103- !122103-122103- 12- 122103- 9140 9116 9148 9116 1� 416780 0010 41678O 122103- 122103- 0020 9125 9047 122103. 912129 V 416790. TRCT 122103- 9045 122103- 9037 Legend CITY Or King County Tax Parcels Scale: Federal Way Subject Property N o �50 3Oo Feet ' 1 I This map is intended for use as a graphical representation only Notified Properties The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy O O CO O 10 (fl (D (.i Q 0 C 0 U 0 Z M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 110 N N N N N O N N N ON N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 00 00 00 00 00 w 00 = = 00 00 00 00 00 00 D1 ON ON O\ 01 O` (71 ON O1 04 ¢ Q ¢ Q ¢ Q ¢ Q Q Q Q ¢ ¢ ¢ Q ¢ ON CO 3333333�0333333333 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Q w w w w w w w¢ w w w w w w w w w C4 z H 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 r w 3 W x N v�i N> � N x N N N (V N Q W DO O t- N t- N N N --� Cl) N 00 " o N O W �r i zt - N O �e1 O O N 01 C\ O O O O O O O O -= Q a en N M M M N �--� N M M CL M M M M M _ .E •� 0 C C G O �_ d .a 7 w� ,v C too m cW� O W H U Z N Zo a a W Q. o m r a Q ¢ a m O a � a 3 0 ZO z ++ A+a' A d�¢ P� GO Cn Q ¢ ¢ 3 +oowzoaz+�ti + a�¢� z z� > zz�-U�2 > x A 3 A wx A F } > a° °4 o a z° 9 cn 0 X 1 � H a 0 3 U U kn (D o W) o kn o0 0 kn ',D �r kn r- - o 'Zt o tn kn kA kn ID���� �� ID� 10� O all o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 J M O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O u 0 O 10 �O 1.0 110 110 110 IO �o io \O �o �o I'D �O 1.0 I'O 1.0 �O 110 �O 1.0 �o 110 \10 �O �D �O �o F- N ID �o �c �O ID �O �O 110 \O �O It r N M U') CO I` W m O N M V Lo CO I- �$� r r r r r r r r �pp,ST, 8��� r ffirG, s - ❑� r February 5, 2016 Jim Ferrell, Mayor Sergey Adzhigirey 32022 51h Avenue SW Federal Way, WA .98023 RE: Permit #16-100205-00-UP; LETTER OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Adzhigirey Wetland Buffer Intrusion, 30523 28t11 Avenue SW, Federal Way Dear Mr. Adzhigirey: The Community Development Department is in receipt of your January 14, 2016, Process III Master Land Use (MLU) application for the proposed intrusion into a wetland buffer to construct a new single-family house. The proposal includes a Wetland Assessment and Buffer Restoration Plan, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates, Inc., to minimize the impacts to the wetland buffer. Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.15.045, within 28 days of receiving an MLU application, the city shall determine whether all information and documentation required for a complete application has been submitted. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Please consider this correspondence a formal Letter of Complete Application. The Process III MLU application is deemed complete as of February 4, 2016. This determination of completeness is based on a review of your submittal relative to applicable requirements referenced within FWRC 19.15.040, "Development application submittal requirements." This notice of complete application does not represent any form of preliminary approval of the proposed site plan. A 120-day time line for reviewing the Process III application has started as of this date. The city's development regulations allow the department 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. However, the 120-day time line will be stopped any time the city requests corrections and/or additional information. You will be informed of the status of the 120-day time line when you are notified in writing that corrections and/or additional information are needed. PUBLIC NOTICE The Notice of Application will be distributed within 14 days of this letter as follows: (1) at least one notice will be posted at the subject property; (2) one copy will be posted at each of the official notification boards; (3) one copy will be published in the Federal Way Mirror; and (4) a copy will be mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. CLOSING Formal processing and review of your application will now begin. Technical review comments will follow at a later date. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835-2641, or Becky.chapin@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Bec�YCao Associate P inner enc: Notice of Application Doc I D 72000 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com GEORGE GERGIS, P.E. CIVIL-SnUCTUKA .-GEO TECHNICAL I2701 Ile Avg E Pupllup,ViiA98374 RES UBMjT-FeD (253) 2,41 3334 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Nov 11, 2015 Client Aleksander Ad zhigirey ch 32022 5 Ave SW Dash Point Road Federal Way, WA 98023 Subject: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDs Geotechnical report, as defined by The City of Federal Way Ordinance "Article II" Critical Areas", Division 4, Geologically Hazardous Areas". The site is Lot 4, Block 6, Lakota Addition, located at 30444 28 h Ave SW, Federal m Way, WA. It is off Dash Point Road and 28 Ave SW, Federal Way, King County, WA. It is in NW 1/4 of section 12, Township 21N, Range 03E, W.M., King County, WA. Parcel # 41660-0600 Prepared by: George Gergis, P.E GEORGE GERGIS, P.E 12701 1111 th Ave E Puyallup, WA 98374 (253) 840-3398 Oct 18, 2007 Aleksander Adzhigirey th 32022 5 Ave SW Dash Point Road Federal Way, WA 98023 Subject: Geotechnical report, as defined by The City of Federal Way Ordinance "Article II" Critical Areas", Division 4, Geologically Hazardous Areas". The site is Lot 4, Block 6, Lakota Addition, located at 30444 28t' Ave SW, Federal to Way, WA. It is off Dash Point Road and 28 Ave SW, Federal Way, King County, WA. It is in NW 1/a of section 12, Township 21N, Range 03E, W.M., King County, WA. Parcel # 41660-0600 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Adzhigirey: At your request we have carried out the necessary investigations to complete the above report in compliance of the scope of work required by The City of Federal Way. The following letter conveys our opinions, findings and conclusions. SITE LOCATION The property under discussion is a strip of land located off the east side of Dash Point th th Road and the west side of 28 Ave SW. At that location both Dash Point Road and 28 Ave S are directed in the north -south direction slightly to the northwest. Shortly to the t, north of the plat site, Dash Point road changes direction to the south west, while 28 Ave th SW continues north but turns to 30 Ave S. The site generally is located about one mile south of Puget Sound in The City of Federal Way area, King County, WA. At that th location, The Dash Point Road was found to be paved and developed unlike The 28 Ave South. As stated in the above paragraph, the site is located directly east of Dash Point Road. The access to the property is proposed to be utilizing a direct driveway that enters the site th from its east side street which is 28 Ave South near the middle of the side. Page 2 Adzhigirey Geo SITE DESCRIPTION As understood, the subject site has never been previously developed and is almost presently in its natural condition. The site generally contains slopes that may be considered medium to relatively steep. Minor disturbance found near the street but all the site topography remains in the natural condition, with medium dense to dense vegetation. During the site visits, field work and exploration, it was found that adjacent sites, to the north and east of the subject lot, have been developed as single family residence lots. The immediate lots of the same plat to the south of the subject lot remain undeveloped. The subject site is almost a trapezoidal shaped parcel of land. The west rear leg spans about 107'feet total length with 35'feet straight line and the remaining very flat curve. It runs in the north-west direction along Dash Point Road. Almost in the same direction, the th east side is 101'feet long broken line, along The 28 Ave South. The north is 478'feet and the south side is about 450'feet, both extend in the east -west direction. As previously stated, the property contains medium to steep slopes. The site is at its to highest elevation at the east side front of 28 Ave South. From there the ground slopes down westerly to the west and southwest toward Dash Point Road. From the top east area, for about ten feet, the ground slopes with 40% grade to the west. That is reduced to 15% in the next 40'feet. It then increases to an average of 27% for the next 200'feet.. From there till the west the slopes continues to flatten to about 7% in the west direction. However, from the main street, Dash Point up to the property, the slopes are about 65%, for about 15'feet only. In total, the site covers an area of about one acre. Please refer to figure 1, attached to this report. Presently, the drainage of the site is a natural surface drainage that runs westerly from the upper areas in the east, and toward Dash Point. Due to the relatively flatter slopes of the site west area of the site and the dense vegetation, it appears that most of the runoff is contained on site. Originally and based on maps provided to us by the owner, Mr. Adzhigirey, it was found that parts of the property were professionally designated as wetlands. A full wetland report was completed and the result is stated in a later section. Page 3 Adzhigirey Geo FIELD INVESTIGATION During the month of October 2015, the writer visited the site and carried out a visual examination of the surface features, slope conditions and vegetation. Two test pits were examined. Test pits allow to investigate and to assess the subsurface conditions. The location of these pits is posted on Figure 1 and their description is as per the attached soil logs sheet. For this site, test pits were determined to be sufficient for this investigation for several reasons. The type of soils expected on site was Indianola Loamy fine sand 0-15% or more. The verified soil is evaluated as matching these soils mostly in the east area of the site areas. These do not present danger of deep landslide due to the relatively denser substratum. In addition, the slopes although steep, are near limits of angle of rest. No weaker layers are located at depth or top, which would result in any type of landslide. There was no seepage or major mottling observed during the investigation in the Indianola. The seepage in The Alderwood is contained in small area with dense substratum. No depressions or tension cracks, which confirm the above considerations. Therefore, in our opinion, the test pits were adequate and sufficient and there were no technical or economical reasons to justified the need of deep soils boring. Also the proposed construction is located in the eastern area of the site where the slopes are moderate. FINDINGS As mentioned earlier, the site generally, over most of its steep areas, was found to be covered with medium dense to relatively dense vegetation covering. The vegetations were mix of some mature, mid age and young trees, with dense overgrowth of berries, salal and other types. At the time of the visit, and except for a small contained area, the site surface generally was found to be dry and appears to be relatively well drained, with no signs or evidenced of ground water seepage. In the subject parcel, no signs of previous ground movement, as would be evidenced by scarps, toppled or leaning trees, could be found on site. Our observations are detailed in the "seismic hazard" and slope stability and landslide hazard" sections at the end of this report. The parcel appears to be stable and we know of no historical landslide events in the immediate area of the lot. The steep slopes were closely examined and appear to be stable. Page 4 Adzhigirey Geo WETLAND As previously stated, original based maps provided to us by the owner, Mr. Adzhigirey, shown that parts of the property were designated as wetlands. Complete wetland report was made to specifically assess the areas designated as wetland and their buffers. The report dated August 21, 2015 is made by "J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc" of Issaquah. As per the wetland codes, the report clearly bordered the wetland areas and the associated buffers that must be set aside from construction activities. Based on the maps and the proposed site plan, the house will be to the east to avoid the wetlands. Attached is the location allowed for construction of the single family residence. As per the attached map, it is allowed to construct in the eastern section with a building setback of 22' from the south line and about 20'feet from the east line. This front setback will allow the house to be away from the front slopes coming down to the construction ground elevation from the street level. This area contains steep slopes CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Discussion of Development As mentioned earlier, the property under discussion has never been developed. It is proposed for the construction of a single family residence. This report has been prepared to address the proposed development. The access to this site will be through a direct th driveway directing west -east from The 28 Ave SW As proposed, no major ground modifications are expected and we see no need for any ch change to the site existing topography. The new structure to the east, near 28 Ave South, will be closer to the eastern steeper slopes. Please refer to a later section addressing the difference in elevation between the street and the construction ground level. This will be discussed to address the driveway and the surface water flow from the street and the slopes itself. Page 5 Adzhigirey Geo 2. Soils Characteristics The Icing County Soil Survey describes the soils of the site, as "InC, Indianola Loamy Fine sand, 4 to 15W. The Soils Conservation Service, states that other types such as Alderwood, Neilton and Everett may be contained with these soils. Based on the examination, in the development proposed site area, we found that generally the soils contain a large amount of medium to coarse sand, which confirms with the Indianola soils. The western area contained soils that are of type that may be considered Alderwood-Kitsap soils. As per The Soil Conservation Services, The Indianola soils are a well drained soils having rapid permeability in all of its layers. The substratum is a relatively soils that are fine to coarse sand. To the west, the Alderwood soils however are less permeable due to the very dense substratum layer which results in seasonal seepage and light to medium mottling. The slow permeability and denser deep soils may cause perching that may occur atop during heavy wet periods. During our investigation we observed seepage to the depth of about 3.50'feet. For The Indianola, the surface runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is moderate to severe, for the steep sloped areas. It may be considered similar for The Alderwood-Kitsap. Our exploration have exposed a fine to coarse sand with silt below eight inches depth soils in a medium dense condition up to about 60"inches. At that depth the soils become slightly denser. Very light scattered mottling has been found at the top 42inches layer. In our opinion, the site subsurface investigation reveals that the site soils generally conforms to the above type described in The KCSS in the soils type and sometimes in gradual condition from type to another but in steeper slopes. Please refer to the attached figure 2, for the soils type description. The site soils have adequate bearing capacity to support structural loads. All types of existing soils are well accepted as fill especially the wet season. During these dry periods they may be used provided that they are free of topsoil, debris and rock fragments larger than 6 inches. Page 6 Adzhigirey Geo However, if the moisture in the soil exceeded the optimum moisture, as defined by ASTM D-1557-91, it will become impossible to reach 95% compaction of the maximum dry density of the soils, as defined by the same test. Therefore the use of these soils in the rainy season or periods is acceptable, if compaction is made to reach 95%. Otherwise structural fill may be needed, see table 1 for specification. Generally, during wet weather construction, material with more than 6 percent fines will not be easily workable. For the soils described as medium dense, a bearing capacity of 1000 psf may be used in the foundation design with an adequate factor of safety. A one- third increase in allowable bearing capacity may be utilized for the short term loads such as the case in the wind or seismic loads. 3- Wetlands Please refer to the "wetland" section in page #4. The section describes the basis for the house proposed location in the site eastern section. The attached plans show the wetland limits and the area allowed to construct. 4- Landslide Hazard Generally, Landslide Hazard Area are these area with slope of 40% or more and with a vertical relief of ten or more feet. Also designated as Landslide Hazard Areas are those with over 15%, containing hillsides intersecting geologic contacts with a relatively permeable sediment overlaying a relatively impermeable sediment or bedrock combined with spring groundwater seepage. Similarly are the areas which have a severe limitation for building site development because of slope conditions, according to the Soil Conservation Service. The first condition applies to small eastern and western areas of the site. All of the remaining of the lot is under 30%% and down to about 8% ground slopes. We have found no signs of erosion, or slides and is the site is stable. The mottling and seepage observed in the pits is a sign of seasonal perching, the top less denser layer, about 40"inch deep, is relatively silty soft to medium dense and no construction is proposed in this area. The development is in the sandy soils are the foundation will be recommended to be at the medium dense layer. Although a small eastern area of the site is considered of landslide type due to the slopes, we conclude that it is stable and development may proceed as proposed considering the recommendations of this report. Page 7 Adzhigirey Geo RECOMMENDATION TO THE EASTERN SLOPES The front slopes have the following effects: 1- The driveway will run from the street level down to the house construction ground level. This is about eight feet of elevation difference. The installation may be accomplished by compacted fill. The edges and sides may be sloped or retained by retaining walls. Please refer to the specific section #5 "Temporary and Permanent Erosion Measures". The section recommended both conditions of whether sloped sides or retaining wall. 2- These front slopes from the street level to the house foundation level will result in generating runoff to the house foundation level. This report recommends to route and contains this flow. This may be accomplished by a combination of the following: (a) Install berm at the top to route the flow from the street from entering the site through the slopes, passing the house location. (b) Install a French drain of 24"x24" at the toe of the slopes. Fitted with a 3"inch perforated pipe. Add a berm at the toe of the slopes. (c) Professionally vegetate the slopes to prevent erosion. 4- Erosion Hazard Erosion Hazard areas are usually defined as those areas classified having moderate to severe, severe or very severe erosion potential by the Soil Conservation services. Considering the sloped area as InC, that soil has a medium to severe erosion hazard as per The Soil Conservation service. This 30% slopes on site may be considered severe and as such the steeper sloped area of the site may be considered as erosion hazard area that requires special care during and post construction. All other areas of the site are not considered erosion hazard. Please refer to the temporary and permanent erosion sections of this report. 5- Temporary and Permanent Erosion Measures Generally, the soils erosion hazard depends and its components and slopes, Because of the relatively large amount of fines in the Indianola and Kitsap soils, it is relatively susceptible to erosion when cuts, exposed surfaces exist, especially with wet weather. Long periods of water exposure will cause erosion when the slopes reach about 30%. Therefore, we do not recommend exposure of cuts for long times in wet or windy periods. Our recommendations in this regard will follow and must be considered carefully to protect the site stability.. Page 8 Adzhigirey Geo The site topography as exist does appear to necessitate medium cuts during the installation of the structure foundation over the sloped ground. These cuts will be made to accommodate the construction of the utilities, the drainage system, if any, and the foundation. A11 the exposed temporary or permanent cuts must be protected by maintaining certain slope and protect its surface from erosion, especially during wet periods. The side slopes of the temporary cuts may be maintained at 1H:1.5V for The Kitsap, assuming short period of exposure in the wet season, not to exceed few days. If open for longer periods, in the wet season, we recommend that side cuts be flattened to 1 H:1 V or to be shored, if over 4.50'feet. The contractor is responsible to comply with the cuts state and federal regulations, beyond the requirements of this report. Retainiiw structures may be required when developing this site, as proposed in the future by the owner. When needed, the following values may be used for that design: Active lateral earth pressure 35pcf, Non restricted walls. Active lateral earth pressure 45pcf, restricted walls Passive lateral earth pressure 250pcf against native or well compacted Coefficient of friction 0.32 factor of safety of 1.5 is already considered for the coefficient of friction. Areas downslope and surrounding any construction excavation should be protected from any sedimented runoff by the use of silt fences (see the attached detail) or by covering the dirt piles with plastic. Similarly, the concentrated runoff from upslope or surrounding areas should be prevented from entering any construction excavation area by diverting the flow. All the excavated materials must be piled, stored and covered suitably until reused or to be exported. This to be done in such a way not to spill onto slope faces, burying the vegetation in the surrounding or downslope areas. Therefore protection of the lower areas to be undertaken by the use of silt fences or covering of the dirt piles at minimum. 6- Site Drainage and Ground Water The site soils have a rapid permeability in its upper layers and slower at depth. We do not expect major variation due to the development, as proposed when the development is considering an adequate value and system. For this type of soils a 1.50 In/Hr permeability may be used for the Indianola, and is acceptable for the design of the any drainage system of the lot, if needed. If needed, a site infiltration system should be a minimum of 25'feet from the top of the steep slopes that are 35% or more. In such case there will be no changes or negative effect regarding the site slopes. Page 9 Adzhigirey Geo Therefore, even if infiltration is to be used, the generated runoff from the new developed impervious area is to have negligent effect on the site area considering: 1- The Indianola is a well draining soils. 2- Comply with top of slope setback 3- Temporary and permanent erosion measure is considered. 4- Utilizing an adequate permeability factors. The final drainage system details are beyond the scope of this report. 7- Proposed permanent cuts & fill Temporary cuts were discussed under the previous section " Temporary Erosion Measures". Permanent cuts may be needed, depending on the development. If utilized, it should not exceed 2H:IV. All permanent slopes must be as soon as possible protected at their faces by seeding with grass or a suitable ground covering shrubs. If room does not allow for that approach, a steeper slopes of 1H:6V may be used and protected with rockeries. Those structures will require permits if their heights exceed 4.0'feet, and must be engineered. Design and construction must comply with the rockery Association, The City of Federal Way and other approved engineering methods. Other retaining structures may be used to provide larger spaces and required to be engineered when over 4.0'feet in height. Permanent fill, if needed, should be also kept at 2H:1 V as a maximum finish slopes, Fill should be compacted as mentioned earlier to 95% compaction. Fill should not be placed over grounds with slopes exceeding 4H:IV, unless tiered, designed and inspected, and as soon as possible vegetated. No runoff is permitted in the east and north setbacks without being controlled. These areas to be well vegetated as detailed later. 8- Foundations and structures All the foundations must rest on the native ground or compacted soil, both verified and inspected to 1000psf with the minimum depth requirements. All the foundations may be conventional spread foundation system. Page 10 Adzhigirey Geo Footing drains are required for this site. For the foundation, or as required in the retaining structures, the drain shall consist of 11/2" washed gravel or rock with a 4"inch PVC perforated pipe embedded in. These lines shall then be directed to the drainage system or to a daylight location 0.50'feet below and 5.00'feet away from the foundation level, with a splash block. The rock must be wrapped with filter fabric. The footing drain lines must not -be connected with the roof drain lines for a distance of 5.0'feet minimum. We estimate the postconstruction settlement of the structures where supported on the medium dense, 2000psf, soils to range from 1/4"inch on native. Maximum differential settlement of the structures should be less than 3/8"inch, measured along 25'feet of continuous wall footing, or between adjacent comparably loaded isolated footings. All the ground surrounding the structure must be sloped away from the foundation with a 2% slopes at minimum or 1 % if concrete or paved slabs. 9- Site vegetation removal The construction activities on this site appear to require some removal of the existing vegetation or ground growth to the east for the driveway areas, in preparation for the development. All areas, post construction, adjacent to the structure and the top of the slopes, that were affected by the development, require professional landscaping installation prior to the final occupancy. Utilizing a deep rooted, less maintenance requirements, full year green type of plants are recommended. Please refer to the page #7 for the recommendation to professionally vegetate the front eastern slopes 10- Seismic hazard Seismic Hazard areas are usually defined as areas which possess either an Alluvial surficial geologic unit and/or recessional outwash overlain by Barneston, Everett, Neilton, Pilchuck or Spannaway soils as per The SCS description. The Kitsap or Indianola are slow drained soils in most of its layers and with deeper and denser substratum. Those soils are not of a type nor in a condition, which is prone to the phenomenon of liquefaction. This occurs as a result of rapid horizontal accelerations during which a rearrangement of the soil particle may cause a build-up in pore pressure. Page 11 Adzhigirey Geo And as this increases the shear resistance decreases to a possible temporary total loss of shear strength. This causes the soil to behave as liquid allowing major settlements. However, this is only possible with soils of very uniform grain size distribution in loose condition, which is not the case of this site. in additions There is no historical evidence of earthquake- induced slides in this area. I I - Slope Stability and Landslide Hazard We believe that the danger of any landslide on this property caused by natural reasons, such as seismic events, is unlikely. The investigation has shown a stable slope in an undisturbed condition. We have noticed no tension cracks over or at the top of the slopes. Also no signs of depressions, scarps or others defect were seen. No signs of previous ground movements or major erosion were observed, such as leaning trees or old escarpments. This confirms that no dormant, active or stabilized slides exist. The steep slopes are relatively at about the critical grade slope and the degree of rest for these type of soils. Surface erosion to these slopes may occur if affected by the construction. Therefore, these slopes should permanently remain protected by complying with the buffer and a setback and by being maintained permanently vegetated professionally. In addition, the denser condition of the soils and the amount of the slopes with denser depth which presents a landslides resistant soils. 12- Setbacks and buffers The following to be maintained as critical buffer areas or setback areas: 1) No area of the site is required to be maintained as buffer zone except as set by the wetland report. 2) An 8 feet foundation setback from the face of the slopes to be maintained. 3) when complying with the wetland report as per the attached proposed house location, provides adequate setbacks for the needed slope stability. 4) Comply with the recommendations stated in Page #7 regarding the front eastern slopes. Please see the attached detail regarding the runoff routing and Page 12 Adzhigirey Geo CONCLUSION The development, as proposed, will have a minor effect on the site erosion, stability and drainage. When the recommendations of the drainage, setback, erosion sections are complied with, any negative effects will be minimum to negligent. In conclusion, we believe based on the above, that the site should not experience landslides as long as protected from erosion, drainage problems and the new development maintains enough setbacks with adequate foundations. LIMITATIONS The information, recommendations and conclusions presented herein have been -prepared using generally accepted geologic and engineering practices and techniques in use in the. date the field investigation was conducted. This report is limited to identifying possible geologic hazards as defined by The City of Federal Way Code mentioned above. This report is limited to the stated purpose for the identified property and should not be applied to any surrounding properties. We make no warranty either expressed or implied with respect to any geologic conditions which can vary between sites and within any one site. If conditions are encountered which appear to differ from those described in this report, we should be notified immediately so that we may review, and either verify or modify our opinions. This report is for the information of the client only. Its reproduction or transmittal to a third party, except in full, is prohibited without the permission of the writer. We would like to thank you for the opportunity to be in your assistance in this report. Should you have any questions regarding the content of this letter, le a contact George Gergis at (253) 241-3334. �� lC Very sincerely, Ge e er 's, E. ;�!16NAL GEORGE GERGIS 12701 11 lth Ave E Puyallup,WA 98374 Depth below Test pit #1 0.00'-0.07' 0.07'-4.20' 4.20'-5.50' Test pit #2 0.00'-0.05' 0.05'-3.70' 3.70'-4.70' Test pit #3 0.00'-0.05' 0.05'-3.70' Page 13 Adzhigirey Geo LOG OF TEST PITS Soil Group Description SM Dark brown grayish silty with some gravel. Dry to moist SM Medium dense brown grayish silty fine to medium sand. No mottling. No seepage. SM Grayish coarse sand with silt. Medium dense to dense. No Mottling or seepage. Moist. SM Dark brown silty with some gravel. Dry to moist. SM Soft. dark brown silty fine sand. Mottling. seepage. Denser at 40"inches SM Dense dark brown silty fine sand. No Mottling. No seaapage SM Dark brown silty with some gravel. Dry to moist. SM Soft to med dense. dark brown silty fine sand. No Mottling. Light mottling. SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM GROUP MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL GROUP NAME GRAVEL i I CLEAN GW WELL -GRADED GRAVEL. FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL COARSE GRAVEL GRAINED GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL SOILS More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL Retained WITH FINES on No. 4 Sieve GC CLAYEY GRAVEL More Than 50% Retained on SAND CLEAN SAND SW WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND No. 200 Sieve SP POORLY -GRADED SAND More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction. SAND SRA SILTY SAND Passes WITH FINES No. 4 Sieve SC CLAYEY SAND FINE SILT AND CLAY ML SILT GRAINED INORGANIC SOILS i CL I � CLAY Liquid Limit ` Less Than 50 ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT. ORGANIC CLAY More Than 50% SILT AND CLAY MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT INORGANIC CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY Passes No. 200 Sieve Liquid Limit 50 or More ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY. ORGANIC SILT _ HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES? SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1 . Feld classification is based on visual examination of soil Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch in general accordance with ASTM D2488-90. Moist - Damp, but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487-90_ Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from below water table 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils. and/or test data. Map Unit Description: Indianola loamy fine sand, 4 to 15 percent slopes --King County Area, Washington King County Area, Washington InC—Indianola loamy fine sand, 4 to 15 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol. 1 hmt7 Mean annual precipitation: 30 to 55 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 degrees F Frost -free period. 190 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Indianola and similar soils: 100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transacts of the mapunit. Description of Indianola Setting Landform: Terraces Parent material: Glacial drift Typical profile H1 - 0 to 6 inches: loamy fine sand H2 - 6 to 30 inches: loamy fine sand H3 - 30 to 60 inches: sand Properties and qualities Slope: 4 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layerto transmit water (Ksat): Hlgh(1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (noninigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Other vegetative classification: Droughty Soils (G002XN402WA) Data Source information Soil Survey Area: King County Area, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 30, 2014 L)sDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 45.2' rr_ 577w-�T LEVEL _ c. _ f i fl' E Cc, I GEORGE GERGIS, P. E. cAqL-s;rRucrcRAL-GoTEcxN'IcA: 1.2701 111 th Ave E PuyaHup, W a 98374 (253) 241-3334 i-4D L'a,- FF6,1 i Ir Rainier Title King/Snohomish Direct: (888) 929-1999 �-� a,'erTitle King/Snohomish Fax: (206) 230-7779 or (425) 339-2491 1C0°I° Local Owned and Operated Pierce Direct: (253) 671-1120 Pierce Fax: (253) 476-3700 Email: TheTitleTeampRainierTitle.com 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98101 RECEDED JAN 19 2016 SCHEDULE A CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CID5 Order Number: 622079 1. Effective Date: August 8, 2011 at 8:00 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Standard Coverage Owner's Policy (06/2006) ST, Owner's Standard Rate Proposed Insured: To Be Determined ALTA Extended Coverage Loan Policy (06/2006) ST, Lender's Extended Simultaneous Issue Rate (Purchase) Proposed Insured: To Be Determined Amount: To Be Determined Premium: To Be Determined Sales Tax: To Be Determined Amount: To Be Determined Premium: To Be Determined Sales Tax: To Be Determined 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment is: FEE SIMPLE 4. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land is at the Effective Date vested in: Aleksandr Adzhigirey and Dina S. Adzhigirey, husband and wife 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described in Exhibit A. Rainier Title, Agent for Stewart Title Guaranty Company By: James R. Hoagland, Unit Manager Page 1 EXHIBIT A Lot 4 in Block 6, Lakota Addition, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Volume 21 of Plats at Page 33, records of King County, Washington; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. End of Schedule A Page 2 SCHEDULE B PART I. The following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. B. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. NOTE: Effective January 1, 1997, and pursuant to amendment of Washington state statutes relating to standardization of recorded documents, the following format and content requirements must be met. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder. FORMAT: Margins to be 3" on top of first page, 1" on sides and bottom, 1" on top, sides and bottom of each succeeding page. Font size of 8 points or larger and paper size of no more than 8'/2' by 14". No attachments on pages such as stapled or taped notary seals, pressure seals must be smudged. INFORMATION WHICH MUST APPEAR ON THE FIRST PAGE: • Title or.titles of document. If assignment or reconveyance, reference to auditor's file number or subject deed of trust. • Names of grantor(s) and grantee(s) with reference to additional names on following page(s), if any. • Abbreviated legal description (lot, block, plat name or section, township, range and quarter section for unplatted). • Assessor's tax parcel number(s). • Return address which may appear in the upper left hand 3" top margin. II. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of the satisfaction of the Company: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records, or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this commitment. B. Any policy issued pursuant hereto will contain the Exclusions From Coverage and, under Schedule B, the standard exceptions as set forth and identified as to the type of policy on the attached Schedules of Exclusions and Exceptions. End of Schedule B Part I Page 3 Order Number: 622079 SCHEDULE B PART II Special Exceptions: Payment of real estate excise tax, if required, pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 82.45, and subsequent amendments thereto. The property described herein is situated within the boundaries of local taxing authority of Federal Way. As of the effective date herein, the real estate excise tax rate is 1.78%. 2. General taxes and charges November 1, if not paid. Year: Amount billed: Amount paid: Amount unpaid: Tax Account No.: Levy code: Assessed value of land Assessed value of improvements: 1st half delinquent May 1, if not paid; 2nd half delinquent 2011 $1,853.72 $926.86 $926.86 416660-0600-03 1205 $145, 000.00 $a.00 3. Matters relating to the questions of survey, rights of parties in possession, and unrecorded lien rights for labor and material, if any, the disposition of which will be furnished by supplemental report. 4. The legal description in this commitment is based upon information provided with the application for title insurance and the public records as defined in the policy to issue. The parties to the forthcoming transaction must notify the title insurance company, prior to closing, if the description does not conform to their expectations. 5. To help you avoid delays at closing, we would like to make you aware of our final recording run times: King County: 2:30 pm Snohomish County: 1:30 pm Monday through Thursday 1:00 pm Friday Pierce County: 2:45 pm IMPORTANT CHANGE FOR KING COUNTY DOCUMENTS! King County recordings are now processed out of our Seattle office at 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 300. Snohomish County recordings are processed out of our Everett office at 2722 Colby Avenue, Suite 125. Pierce County recordings are processed out of our University Place office at 3560 Bridgeport Way W., Suite 2E. Page 4 6. Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantor: Aleksandr Adzhigirey and Dina S. Adzhigirey, husband and wife Trustee: Ticor Title Beneficiary: Washington Mutual Bank Original amount: $101,500.00 Dated: January 13, 2005 Recorded: January 20, 2005 Recording No.: 20050120001737 7. We find no pertinent matters of record against the name(s) of the vested owners. 8. We find no conveyances within the last 24 months. 9. Title will be vested in parties yet to be disclosed. When title is vested, their title will be subject to matters of record against their names. 10. Matters set forth by survey: Recorded: May 24, 2004 Recording No.: 20040524900002 End of Schedule B Part II Page 5 /1-) Additional Notes: A. Abbreviated Legal Description: Lt 4, BI 6, Lakota Add B. Property Address: 29xx S.W. Dash Point Road, Federal Way, WA 98023 C. Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, telephone, gas, electricity or garbage and refuse collection. D. In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. E. Unless otherwise requested, the forms of policy to be issued in connection with this commitment will be ALTA 2006 policies, or in the case of standard lender's coverage, the CLTA Standard Coverage Policy — 2006. The Owner's policy will automatically include the Additional Coverage Endorsement, when applicable, at no additional charge. The Policy committed for or requested may be examined by inquiry at the office which issued the commitment. A specimen copy of the policy form(s) referred to in this commitment will be furnished promptly upon request. F. In the event that the commitment jacket is not attached hereto, all of the terms, conditions and provisions contained in said jacket are incorporated herein. The commitment jacket is available for inspection at any company office. G. The policy(s) of insurance may contain a clause permitting arbitration of claims at the request of either the insured or the company. Upon request, the company will provide a copy of this clause and the accompanying arbitration rules prior to the closing of the transaction. Page 6 Rainier Title 100% Locally Owned and Operated STG Privacy Notice 2 (Rev 01/26/09) Independent Agencies and Unaffiliated Escrow Agents WHAT DO/DOES THE RAINIER TITLE LLC AND STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION? Federal and applicable state law and regulations give consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal and applicable state law regulations also require us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand how we use your personal information. This privacy notice is distributed on behalf of Rainier Title LLC and Stewart title Guaranty Company and its affiliates (the Stewart Title Companies), pursuant to Title V of the Gramm -Leach -Bliley Act (GLBA). The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service that you have sought through us. This information can include social security numbers and driver's license number. All financial companies, such as Rainier Title LLC and Stewart Title Guaranty Company, need to share customers' personal information to run their everyday business —to' process transactions and maintain customer accounts. In the section below, we list the reasons that we can share customers' personal information; the reasons that we choose to share; and whether you can limit this riQ. For our everyday business purposes— to process your transactions and maintain your account. This may include running the business and managing customer accounts, such as processing transactions, mailing, Yes No and auditing services, and responding to court orders and legal investigations. No For our marketing purposes— to offer our products and services to 1 Yes you. We don't share For joint marketing with other financial companies No For our affiliates' everyday business purposes— information about your transactions and experiences. Affiliates are companies related by Yes common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial No companies. We don't share For our affiliates' everyday business purposes— information about No your creditworthiness. No For our affiliates to market to you Yes We don't share For nonaffiliates to market to you. Nonaffiliates are companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and No nonfinancial companies. Page 7 We may disclose your personal information to our affiliates or to nonaffiliates as permitted by law. If you request a transaction with a nonaffiliate, such as a third party insurance company, we will disclose your personal information to that nonaffiliate. We do not control their subsequent use of information, and suggest you refer to their privacy notices. Sharing practices - How often do/does Rainier Title LLC We must notify you about our sharing practices when you request a and Stewart Title Guaranty Company transaction. notify me about their practices? How do/does Rainier Title LLC and To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, Stewart Title Guaranty Company we use security measures that comply with federal and state law. These protect my personal information? measures include computer, file, and building safeguards. How do/does Rainier Title LLC and We collect your personal information, for example, when you Stewart Title Guaranty Company request insurance -related services collect my personal information? provide such information to us We also collect your personal information from others, such as the real estate agent or lender involved in your transaction, credit reporting agencies, affiliates or other companies. What sharing can I limit? Although federal and state law give you the right to limit sharing (e.g., opt out) in certain instances, we do not share your personal information in those instances. Contact l.ls If you have any questions about this privacy notice, please contact us at: Stewart Title Guarant Com Company, 1980 Post Oak Blvd., PrivacyOfficer, Houston, Texas 77056 Page 8 ere 100% Locally Owned and Operated Order No. 622079 m Q � �v � 2 30 + 30 1p F � f , � O ti 8 ss I 17 -- -__ iao.-a _•r KrSPS7 �• {� n� 2 Lerr1 � r-�• � i '''jam a r' i � 10', y '* 1 =i j 1' --"--------AK-Al ---------------- 1 1 t a 1 k 1 a 1 o 1.1 This sketch is provided without charge, for your information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property including, but not limited to: area, dimensions, easements, encroachments or location of boundaries. It is not a part of, nor does it modify, the commitment/policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further information. Page 9 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Form 1004-251 D (Rev. 06/2006) Issued By nier Title Stewart Title Guaranty Company ORIGINAL Page 10 Stewart Title Guaranty Company, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the exceptions and conditions and stipulations shown herein, the Exclusions from Coverage, the Schedule B exceptions, and the conditions and stipulations of the policy or policies requested. (See reverse side of this cover and inside of back cover for printed Exclusions from Coverage and Schedule B exceptions contained in various policy forms.) This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement and is subject to the Conditions and Stipulations on the back of this cover. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate 180 days after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. Stewart Title Guaranty Company NOTE: THE POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE OF RAINIER TITLE AND A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM (OR FORMS) REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT WILL BE FURNISHED PROMPTLY UPON REQUEST. RAINIER TITLE IS AN ISSUING AGENT FOR Stewart Title Guaranty Company COMMITMENT CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 1 If the proposed insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, Ilen, encumbrance, adverse eta im or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed insured shall disciose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule 8 of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed insured and such parties included under the definition of insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual toss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith, (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown In Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy of pollcies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions, the Conditions and Stipulations, and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or Interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The matters listed below each policy form are expressly excluded from the coverage of that policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason thereof. Page 11 �1 AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10/17/92) I. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (t) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (6) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected an the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part', or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governments[ regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material); or (e) rmWng in loss or damage which would not have been sustained If the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth -in -lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgage insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (a) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or (c) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (i) to timely record the instrument of transfer, or (ii) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (6/17106) 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibition, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or 14); or (d) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. I. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing - business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 3. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth -in -lending law. 3. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy, 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of €he Insured Mortgage 1n the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11(b). CLTA STANDARD COVERAGE LOAN POLICY 1990 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, prohibiting regulating, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy. (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth -in -lending law. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating Page 12 the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10117/92) 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or locations of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (ivy environmental protection, or the affect of any violation of these laws, ordinances of governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the Insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (a) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (1) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (ii) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (6/17/06) 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10; or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (b) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (c) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Tille as shown in Schedule A. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE FOR A ONE -TO -FOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE (01/01/08) In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of those portions of any law or government regulation concerning: (d) building; (e) zoning; (f) land use; (g) improvements on the Land; (h) land division; and (i) environmental protection. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23 or 27. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14 or 15. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17. 4. Risks: (a) that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they are recorded in the Public Records; (b) that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they are recorded in the Public Records at the Policy Date; (c) that result in no loss to You; or (d) that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.e, 25, 26, 27 or 28. . 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right: (a) to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and (b) in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exr,)usion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 21. SCHEDULE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS The matters listed below each policy form are expressly excepted from the coverage of that policy and that policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason thereof. SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY - STANDARD COVERAGE AND CLTA STANDARD COVERAGE LOAN POLICY 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession, or claiming to be in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land, and that is not shown by the Public Records. 5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for labor, material, services or equipment, or for contributions to employee benefit plans, or liens under workmen's compensation acts, not disclosed by the public records. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof: (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not Iimited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a.), (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 7. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use. occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 8. Any service. installation, connection, maintenance or construction Charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage collection or disposal, Page 13 or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records. SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY — EXTENDED COVERAGE 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Underground easements, servitudes or installations which are not disclosed by the public records. 3. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a). (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 4. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 5. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, or garbage collection or disposal, or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records. SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA LOAN POLICY (10/17/92) and ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10122/03) No general exceptions appear in these policy forms. Page 14 Branch :LYK,User :LK23 Order: 622079 Title Officer: TT Comment Station Id :JABE 20050120001736.001 AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: Aleksandr Adzhigirey and Dina S. AA 32022 - 5th Avenue Southwest Federal Way,WA 98023 20050120101736 .� T3COR NRTIONRL ti0 Y0.00 PRIGE08IaaO�F I1102 10tYHG S0 T"R't5 Filed for Record at Request of E2097114 SeaTac Escrow, Inc. 01/20/2023 13:33KIir, rAt>Nrr, uagtR� Escrow Number: B04133IND g� stR.' '0ap;p�e PRGE001 OF 001 Statutory Warranty Deed a- Grentor(s): Rick Brannon and Debra Brannon Grantee(s):Aleksandr Adzhigirey and Dina S. Adzhigirey Abbreviated Legal: Miq Tmp Lot 4, Block 6,Lakota Addition, Vol. 21, Pg. 33. /_3y3o5g—a Additional legal(s) on page: 2 Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(s): 416660-0600-03 THE GRANTOR Rick Brannon and Debra Brannon, husband and wife for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION in hand paid, conveys and warrants to Alekesndr Adzhigirey and Dine S. Adzhigirey, husband and wife the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION Dated 1/10/200S Rick Brannon Debra Brannon State of Washinrtlaa 1 County of King _ _ } SS: I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Rick Brannon and Debra Brannon is the persou(s) who appeared before me, and said persons) acknowledged that they signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this inshwnent. Dwcd:' V j�" c-2C)Os-- L n HINA M DAUGS NOTARY PUBLIC Notary Public in and fnr the State of Won STATE OF WASHINGTOIr Residing at COMMISSION EXPIRES My appointment expires: AUGUST a, 2008 Page I oft LP610 KING,WA Pagel of 2 Printed on 8/11/2011 10:55:56 AM Document: DED WAR 2005.0120001736 . ' Branch :LYK,User :LK23 r 1 Order: 622079 Title Officer. TT Commeri") Station Id :JABS .a EXHIBIT A 20050120001736.002 Lot 4, Block 6, Lakota Addition, according to the plat thereof recorded in Vohnne 21 ofplats, pages) 33, in King County, Washington SUBJECT TO: Easements, restrictions, reservations and provisions of record, if any. Page 2 cf2 LPS10 KING,WA Page 2 of 2 Printed on 8/11/2011 10:55:56 AM Document: DED WAR 2005.0120001736 140.45 --I ' 120 +/- �r I KCSP 377065 I 4 �' �, 4,- 2 LOT 1 3�9• � a /� 17100 __ cI 180 ` 139.45 UI o' � I t o i I o 5 �: i o 3 42 30 � I 38.35 `-- --- -1 I i p , O \ U 4 , , ----------- 163`35 ------------ -1 \ , \N CJ 7 r o u `5 \`� N �.v , 5 \ 416660 0605 ----- - 198.89 - - --� \ Q P ON 4 \ �Q UA 234.39 - ---------------------- -� \ — , 9 o LP \ C� 269.89 \ ---------------------------- - --CD C1 i 0 10 N�� a \� -..------------------------------ 285 1� ` d'� a �s' w + 326.6 416660 1 ------ 7711221023 F LOT 2 422.5 416660 0595 480 416660 0600 416660 468.6 LAKOTA VOL. 21133 456.6 416660 0608 416660 0610 S 88-49-47 E Lo v+ W c 8 8 99�gQ � tS S 88-58-18 E 6Er. om 9 G .ta 1'1 ❑ 3y w 6. 5 416650 0655 1 28600 SF �\ 0591 \ 22 Of 37067 SF _ 3 0655 135.01 150 rp ------------------------ ' 14, KCSP 8528 ts� DATED 3-12-7; F 9 alsfifio 0657 'w ' : LU 1 .3 CD o a z \ r 9p 4 1.32 A 57398; 0657 1.01 AC ` z6 - - 298.61 54 0595 6 N o Icn v' w KCSP 8529� 1.03 AC ! 30 601ti 0600 30 5 \ 38,' 272.03 (SURV) 269.5 �1N a 519.5 (P) 1.06 AC �'' r* O p \ 0605 \ \:,A 6 1.04 AC N \ 0608 , m� �\ 256.02 L7 � ' 1.03 AC 415%0 0674 610 0 47.5 7 442.05. (SURV.) `\ C yy�� RECETV \ c 24000 SF 416660 JAN 14 2016 \ 0674 0615 La 1.03 AC, 3p \ 3� 4S. 69.5 �' \ CITY ��RDERP`aVAY 46o D5 452.31 (SURV.) 701�, Sao s� Lo k�) _22 AC T CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY TACOMA WATER PART A - TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT PROJECT ADDRESS: 30523 28TH AVE SW, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 APPLICATION NUMBER: 20000087261 RECEIVED SUBDIVISIONIPROJECT NAME: PROPOSED NEW SFD PARCEL: PA4166600600 JAN 14 2010 Proposed Water Usage: 1 (# of connections) Customer Type: RESIDENTIAL CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Is there an Auxiliary Source of Water on the Parcel? NO I CDS Page 1 I, the undersigned, or my appointed representative have requested the following purveyor to certify willingness and ability to provide the indicated service. I have read and understand the information provided by the water purveyor on this certificate, and acknowledge that the proposed project may require improvements to the water system which would incur my financial obligation. Prior to final approval for construction of the water facilities, it is understood that a legal contract between myself and the water utility which specifies the term of water service, operational responsibilities, and financial obligation may be required. NAME: ALEKSANDR ADZHIGIREY SIGNATURE: ADDRESS: 32022 5TH AVE SW CITY: FEDERAL WAY STATE: WA ZIP: 98023 (Please ensure that the above is completed PRIOR to submittal to the Water Purveyor.) PART B - TO BE COMPLETED BY WATER PURVEYOR Water System To Provide Service CITY OF TACOMA State ID# 8680ON Equivalent Residential Units: 1 The proposed development is within our approved water service area. This water utility will be providing service. Approved number of connections: NIA. Number of Current/existing users: N/A Water service will be provided by: Existing source capacity 132 MGD Existing Storage: 323 MG Direct Connection to approved, existing water main. * The customer is not allowed to install their water service pipe parallel to and inside a Pierce County Right of Way. Obtaining an easement/permission to install your water service pipe on adjacent private property may be an alternative to constructing a new water main. Contact the Tacoma Public Utilities, Tacoma Water for details/requirements for constructing a water main. — Are water system facilities approved in accordance to DOH requirements? YES. Water service will be made available to this project by (date): N/A. The date that water service is made available is determined after the customer meets the requirements for service as indicated by the Water Division, in accordance with City Code 12.11 and upon recei t of applicable permits. Form Name: ZPM SMF_WATERCERT 009A1 T.` . CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY TACOMA WATER PROJECT ADDRESS: 30523 28TH AVE SW, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 APPLICATION NUMBER: 20000087261 SUBDIVISION/PROJECT NAME: PROPOSED NEW SFD PARCEL: PA4166600600 FIRE FLOW INFORMATION: FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS. WATER MAINS: * Location of nearest main capable of supplying at least 500 GPM. SW DASH POINT RD Page 2 If not in street at front of property, distance from property to above main is: N/A feet. NOTE: *Estimated Fire Flow at 20 PSI is: 1500 ± GPM for 60 minutes. If specific data are required, contact the Water Division to arrange for a flow test. *Estimated static pressure at project location is: -116 ± PSI. Tests will be conducted by the Water Division at the expense of the applicant. HYDRANTS: * Distance from centerline of property frontage to nearest hydrant measured along routes of fire apparatus travel is: 340 ± feet. THE AMOUNT OF AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW INDICATED ABOVE IS IN ADDITION TO REQUIREMENTS FOR NORMAL DOMESTIC MAXIMUM USE. A WATER SYSTEM VICINITY MAP WHICH SHOWS THE WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS SERVING THIS PROJECT IS REQUIRED FOR ALL PROJECTS. A contract has not been signed with the applicant for water service. The above information is an accurate account of the existing or necessary water system facilities. FOR PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT OR SUBDIVISIONS: We understand that this document, in absence c` a legal contract, constitutes a certification of willingness and ability to provide water service subject to the conditions noted. Water service will be provided in accordance with Washington Administrative Code 246-290, RCW 90.44 (Water Rights Permits), Pierce County Ordinances 86-117S3 and 92-99, Tacoma City Code, Chapter 12.10, and an approved water system comprehensive plan. WATER PURVEYOR CITY [ F TACQM�,, T,P.U., WATER DIVISION. DATE: 06/02/2008 SIGNATURE: TITLE. FOR FINAL SHORT PLAT, SUBDIVISION, BUILDING PERMIT, SEPTIC DESIGN: NOT APPROVED FOR FINAL ACCEPTANCE We the undersigned water purveyor, certify that we will assume full operational and maintenance responsibility for the above water system which has been designed, approved, and installed in accordance with Washington Administrative Code 246-290, RCW 90.44 (Water Rights Permits), Pierce County Ordinances 86-117S3 and 92-99, Tacoma City Code, Chapter 12.10, and an approved water system comprehensive plan. WATER PURVEYO � C TY OF 1"ACO A, T.P �4J., WATER DIVISION. DATE: 06/02/2008 SIGNATURE: r f . TITLE: This certificatelis valid for a period) of THREE YEARS from the date of issue solely for the specific property/project indicated. CharwsAn the number of lots and/or use will require re -application by the applicant, evaluation by the department and issuance of a new certificate. (Board of Health Resolution No. 2001-3282 - Land Use Regulations) THE ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE IS DEPENDENT ON PIERCE COUNTY'S WILLINGNESS TO PERMIT THE INSTALLATION WHICH MAY INCLUDE CUTTING THE DRIVING SURFACE OF THE STREET. . i `� i -- - -- •• �-. _� � wry--"�r�^�'� '•, -� la ►N � . ,....I.R �•. _ -a - Lam. ��_ �� y � � ,.. 'r•:`.'t -. i`. ': �'f �' �• •.sue :;•M �� �"..-� '�� �} � i - �� f' .�•` S "�,.:_ i..' •� .ice` J+a 2 •k't�� �it�.��- � -f. r _cis :�S'-s �i f �• "' � ��• r .� r ..� .t a yi� .' { • �' `:�, .�� � �� �_ `tee. �`t Ilk — IL '14 ;4-m kb . � A _ ''� tl'�4�:�..,1 `• � T � .,+�� �� r, fir._ �ee Na r� Adzhigirey Vicinity Map 2�p 4L Ce yFITE c`v� S W SW 3O4TH ST � ��.y G V) o SW M < SW 3D 6Ty P co Ln SW @P-M Thomas Bros RECEIVED JAN 14 2016 CITY DE FEDERAL WAY CDS CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 19, 2016 TO: E.J. Walsh, Development Services Manager Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer South King Fire & Rescue raraiam FOR DRC MTG. ON.• FILE NUMBER(s): RELATED FILE NOS.: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS. ZONING DISTRICT. - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: LAND USE PERMITS PROJECT CONTACT: MATERMLS SUBMITTED: Becky Chapin, Associate Planner February 4, 2016 - Internal Completeness Review 16-100205-00-UP 15-100258-AD & 14-100487-SF Adzhigirey Reasonable Use/Wetland Buffer Intrusion 30523 28t' Aveune SW RS 15.0 Reasonable use exemption for construction within a Category III wetland buffer. FWRC 19.145.090. Process III Sergey Adzhigirey 32022 5 h Avenue SW Federal Way, WA 98023 ■ Master Land Use Application • Site Photo ■ Vicinity Map • Certificate of Water Availability ■ Septic Design Approval • Geotechnical Report • Wetland Assessment • Wetland Boundary Map • Buffer Averaging and Buffer Restoration Plan Becky Chapin From: Sergey Adzhigirey <sergey.adzhigirey@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 7:16 PM To: Becky Chapin Subject: Adzhigirey Project - Cease Work Attachments: 14572 TOPO.pdf [EXTERNAL EMAIL WARNING] This email originated from outside of the City of Federal Way and may not be trustworthy. Please use caution when clicking links, opening attachments, or replying to requests for information. If you have any doubts about the validity of this email please contact IT Help Desk at x2555. Becky, I have spent most of today in phone to figure this situation out. The PM for Tacoma water has responded with a message that he is out due to surgery. Attached is the surveyors assessment that was originally complete. His response was that north flags are where the wetland ends and does not exist any further. Also speaking to the Wetland specialist, he recommended restoration that will also be complete in the drainfield. We originally planned to divert north closer to Dashpoint Rd and will defiantly do that to not disrupt wetland. With that all got a corrective action to appropriately fill dirt from Jared from Erosion Control. while we work through this, please let us resume the construction project. Thank you Sergey CITY OF =r Tax Federal Way APPLICATION NO(S) RECEIVED JAN 14 2016 CITY OF FEDL rrlic' MASTER LAl D USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8"' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.citvoffcdcralway.com I (o — 100205 —00 UTrff Date Project Name A d ' el r-z Property Address/Location 909 'ZAP`' Parcel Number(i) I ®G06 Project Description'ex o I�� P1 VA VP PRINT Type of Permit Required _ Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) _/lprocess III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) _ Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information JP S, 6 Zoning Designation _SF Comprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type Construction Type Applicant Name: 5 ".a.y az�. "� ry ; r a-y Address:32,pz2 -St% Il,�v So City/State: A Zip: q Rd-z3 Phone: 2 o G o -- z 1 1 1 Fax: A , Email: .1 tay ��w�..'. f • (o.� Signature: °r"i Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: Address: 326z-a 5 r" \k- S(13 City/State: Zip: el P-D Z j Phone: 2p 16 Fax: Email: Signature: 14* ., 0003 —January 1, 2011 Page I of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application RESUBMITTED Public Health - Seattle and King County JUL 0 7 2016 1 Repar Site Design Application Form for Individual On -Site Sewage System (OSS) I ON (Submit 5 copies of application with 4 copies ofplans) CM OF FEDERAL WAY I Department Use Only Pproximate S ATTACH A DETAILED ROUTE/ DIRECTION Site Address: 3O' V,411 -0*r7./ 4,11/� `,� fir,% MAP FOR LOCATING THE PROPERTY. Name and address of property owner f �c�.`7� /� l41� �r ar � Applicant Street Address Name � City -Zip Code t Z L AVPhone G U `7'!I Last First QBa3 Designer Street Address e 9 City -Zip Code Phone 25J- -•�a THIS IS NOT A PERMIT - PROPERTY INFORMATION: Legal Description Attached 0 Parcel # (APN) 6 ,6 0 f ti ) Section: 1 r' 1 2J Township: I I Range: 'C" Subdivision Name: _ � $ �] _ Lot: L� Y Block: r? Property Size ` CI Sq. ft. Acreage: /!� I Rural Area ❑ Urban Area A s'1 q'I D L G S^�F'v'ii�;l= 1 I` 141�1 Distance from property line to nearest sewer: '�/ - and 6,cc 5[_f) ('� Ilr•�. _.I 'I i. _ �'' 2i='. IJi'7rn r? c;7tIF) Ut} Water Supply L J (IP) I = Individual 5_71 Group A Supply Group B Supply Public Water Supply Name: 1 22C&2M'qAL ID# Sensitive Area: (Y?N) If yes, specify LUtz' (L,W,O) L = Landslide W = Wetlands O = Other SYSTEM INFORN�ATION: r�e0;'a New System U Repair Design " Correction of OSS Failure? L ] Y?N Detailed Plans Attached (4 sets) L` Y?N Type of Building 1 1 1 I SF = Single Family MF = Multiple Family COMM = Commercial INST = Institutional Type of System Proposed: ° P — IG = Gravity GP = Gravity with pump M = Mound SF = Sand Filter PD = Pressure Distribution HT = Holding Tank CT = Composting Toilet E = Experimental 0 = Other Dates Soils Logged: �� ; 1> 6' Soil Logs Data Attached: (Min. 4/lot) U Y?N Depth to Watertable or Restrictive Layer: /Inches Maximum Slope in Drainfield/Reserve Area CALCULATIONS: Number of bedrooms � Total Gallons/Day (450 minimum): ? '' Gal. Soil Texture Type (1A-5) � Application Rate: Lj,..E Gal/sq ft/day Total Absorption Area: 1 1 1 1 Sq. ft. Trench Width Lj inches Total Drainfield Length: I '- ! Ft. Septic Tank Size: 1_ i Gal. Garbage Grinder /'/Y?N Pump Chamber Size (if needed) 1 / 1 1 6' 1 : 1 Gal. Trench Depth (min/max): 1 0✓'s 1 I 1 2 r, inches I understand that failure to comply with the Code of King County Board of Health Title 13 may result in the disapproval of the sewage system being proposed in this application. Non-compliance may lead to revocation of my Designers C of Olen or pr rlate legal action by the Health Department, Designer's Signature: .1yt - K.C. ID# I I Date.�f�� FOR HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE ONLY; NOTE: SYSTEM MUST BE INSTALLED BYAKING COUNTY CERTIFIED INSTALLER VNLESS -' OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY CODE APPROVED (date): BY: w Comments 00(';S- -Pre-construction meeting required between designer, installer, builder prior to permit issuance APPROVAL OF THIS DESIGN APPLICATION IS BASED SOLELY ON INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS APPLICATION AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE PERMISSION TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION of THE PROPOSED SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM OR ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ON THE SITE. THIS APPROVAL SHALL NOr9E COHSIDEREDAN ASSUFANCE. ErNER EXPnSSER OR IMPLIED, THAT DEVELOPMENT PERMITS FOR THE SITE WILL BE ISSUED. THIS APPLICATION EXPIRES TWO YEARS FROM DATE OF APPROVAL. DISAPPROVED (date): - BY - See attached Site De iciency Sheet-- . Any person aggrieved by any decision 7find! order. :of IfIe Heab Officer may file a wiiften application for appeal to the Health Officer within 60 calcndarclays O the date'aftle above ded§m (ii6e 13,:KC,B.O.H. Chapter 13.12 - Sewage Review Committee). CS 13.15.97 Rev.7/21/00 RECEIVED PAROU DATA name Site Address R.sid.nb.1 A— , P,sparty N— Eteal Desulptlaft FL4KOTAADID tKal Block: 6 Dial Loll 4 DAT-� �"j Best Use As If Vacant Bee._Use A. irnp— ed Pr,ynt sasa Und V.I.e SqFt U Base Land Value Imp='d Rase Lane Valued Date 114/1013 Base Land Value T. Year iC is Land SdFt VSBWa Seattle Slqn,. P,getSound L,k' Waslingen Lak i_!c Z k�k �lllHstonc Site C-em kz Nbr Bldg Sit- Acjj-ent to Gof , Fairway NO I Iry Designation WD N.ti- Gr.v Pr.lecb.n Ease.ell ---- --------�DNR lease - -- Rest :G,-.S-Shape Zorung DISTRICT RCIIO Access jPUBLIC P� ADEQUATE Anll Surface PAYED - qaterfront Nalwftnt L ... h.n I ,.I Dep F A�m WiNvOW Restricted A=— P—irnity Influence other Nuisances I WYAr Problems 20 NO 0 N 0 Reference Links: Klna County Sax ft&%% (External link) Pc&d at To (External link) Guard a; AP.P.291rA0!A.. 1i7atJ,—DQ M& Cis cayyK r1GRSJI'.Ii i111. ]q..:1,71n III' � C:,r�..•. �..' t F �7r -'. �••: r1adM00➢0 17:{9M71 •. � ;'I �� f . � � '.`AL x' '• � � r }r.' { +:66F4Vf63 J164S007 •A .: •i{'I. • rii�'IOtrq riafe8aGf46 fs46[LG::9 '� �' ,' '1�'i.C"j{ i'• • (' � - � ••''.y lSCC7VJ arnusG6lro a:...-.r)-/µ�1.1., ;�•�.at'N.._... ',•'"" er66[iG�'Js .r• •• -::.l � A•l l i _7�.: C•! :� .. rl fl]11 m*UL.rGO a16667Uf95 �:• --+ _: _•:•" t3'. f` ` fit, l•tir 11; .t 'it�` =t' ,5�� 4)tam 1p4 7� I,�4• C L } � �. I'•'/7' 1- �.'.Y`7� .. py21Dyi7AM ' � 7' . � Z�� •ley l�•. Jt,r �.:. ti'. ' araan7B345 •� [ '� r`i p ufliN-• • .•. , r,c~eDai3o a:ecrea7fa � t:i; .717 "��;;'.�t�; r: .; � rparxcsJ� � ifr: iCe2YB 47d66W]]1 47 L4R303 i4 - A 416elfQ721a ii 61?1i07sL - i ^jti 1 j_,..• '.l `. '�:; r67:s70]eo emsdwam5 •� n'�i.1ii�•�l�•rA]76a81p0 rr67roP51•Q a1w-iaalo .' , �'....II ..' '• .. . rlr7lflm'f3 rltl6eP]c _- I •. ,_y. puJT?e0770 a ltl dubYJ1 r•C:60�+:L+ } _ ff ri rlerlcan]o 4101D:i214 •:ssm.66 ��:•:,.. -1' .. '.T sa]75749B4 41369ot1]'] a76iawiri • .s 71dF67J3i7 MMIX690 arer+Da7ed „61, P'c Vtop, sa ■ PEA i2fo�o4i ilsYloC?a0 r16Grd0Si3 rfdl9U0)!1 ... ✓ � ice' dr!v dg3T�+/JYI 617 (96 rrG6a99S60 f97r30:];0 a12rS77ol6 of rif9j2l17 Alf.- c'�'W Tr• r a 7d'")" rcrvcros 4 ' LAJrE7 J:aA]7wtLY7 �tY70:-5@ i1671CJ1d3 ff 67100T7i �7d560'NfE 052:�1r0:.r1 e97P600 r+a' �C1o7sa:7 !rl{69(rJ<50 d47fd0tWE0 a i101401] 71y71oo7?6 +'1 ' ,�• •. sC77X.tYCo 121o7S79i irei r0Y295 1106111411 'ii%6F[37rfA 'f � - e 7E7p7N aP77i07050 219Jg79r ala7'D9dp4•a16e977f ri 41m66a9 Ii1 . Oirid92d+7 ✓11 iq]po96 � 1:6d600473 117�7Ld7f09 09374070+D rirYlE+>CaT4 r!d)1M7:J II 70O_D0.SY 1 89775Wa'1J 1 U121A'yk?U9 d166e00+77 J7G660UaC5 Iy77df/U76G iMtl�o9 0721MID i1 e7f00090 .j1671[1D'J_'S L•9376'YJ030 f2YL7DKd 111161:3 111 4: . r 072103PP60 0121OM715 "I4 E6607i66 rPfr6'W7/0 i z73r,Da"=° 01210]rof1 47G71"10 416Ed00475 f1a66p1}[ - y' 721{r�d� 012=9117 4161FDO130 71d4G00+7 � •� 175 CS 37i7N dT7¢L�9] 893/EOUIPD 6937SDDU10 _. !!66G1`16a7 �BB9d20 i}i- i1 EE60064a 6C97?002B0 TR-C a9942007 67 ~�� T, A76E6D06iS B69TT00270 � 0B94207150 i76660a430 7/6660060 BBBGO lr94200140 4766600653 47EE60U547 f166a00692 B9Pa2CO2e • r r7 BE4070 ;_ B"��L'GD2YJ 9B042M7�0 �� `�l ._J� n1UE=.i:u^f �4 »�I!� BB942W_^SD W4T70720, - d;'BC4dY34u ❑umar ru! [an e.a 4i GE"J_kJ656 uew2 ma ![ 2 i'J.716 a7 tiEEC°C'667 a1fi66[p14B4 411 6G7J669 ��4 �� 'n{Nr:M22o 1S 6B97200]70 _ � .� • �� rsweorx-e � f {166E00667 a'$S¢ �•'- Fe[leral tiN�y [1t66aJ6sB, `Gnl2anxv. ers+rxn6u 9evr7?pfvd � 41EdE00605 a'ja7dr41b: r6, 776TJ02iM [l6rm7!]7 1 ,� .17 G6670606 dl6E390Y70 < rld7]'x!aD. 47r7300130 7r6T3:x719U SN 2,.r• r d 16E606G?U Jr 6f]r!']]57 7_2}0) m 476OW614 4166SM673 r166K10676 41d66U0871 41073WZOO flal]dC'i50 7761J00210 Nfit3W7u9 71 GT700i CU 416116 1L d106800620 41666WG76 476T7W1G0 478TT00 M e16.-MIGO dPY 1tr71]I Sr 4166Ei1^62T5 41666W6T7 4767Y001B0 4l67700210 ' 4'1B96006T6 .1167.170170 91677002D0 7167100 19 176G600640 4167Y00190 � r7677007� •�[ Sig 70rTy sT 0 070 '�•. 41n7BW140 41676_'S71f0 416JB0DIDi B000�0 �n 4167M 170 f. 476TaCII f ti 122lD3Z21 1_1039140 � 722f039116 CC'e 1!E •�Sr� I22147676BD070 1227039767 crn '76781 ' 4is7W.00.",J 776TW0010 12Z103912T 12219390a7 a1slBoaz7D L27039!25 r1670D0'J30 111'103912B t 76r347J75o o 47679W2UD f.m T8iW mzmiwr b -D pb6sd6 a7G79o7RC7 r]-1*040 i6ii167:C4N9D 1PAIJ913MOUB ai6.i77y6W7970P00 16TA7RC16721 115.20010 167]Kuffm 16YSJp1ai14"]7d71p0 Ecp�O7d.nJSDO9 0LBrWi r6]aeD 60r745]7r7•Ux01r0ra8570r17,7741oorp lG771]0WF! 12210390r6 ?.b G7v>d1'Sa 7>10a d 16TJ070B70 167 16776"IlpG110 16At177]➢0 - 1fi7v07614 Id7 or r0 t, 1519oD09nG fsT '167yJULr_YA 76:3009l20 ..S6i37U0d7 ;`21039037 1�'�006�far>76o6+a serxeG]z 1E77.100700 f3T]70o61g 1 16 r.:., 19?:'D9<F339 ldMMAW4 616r3000.L0 76rJP70670 r6?.>n7671 cs alrnr dr y r6776[9 n6 oG76710 ra7r-'Pro7 ro 7a77P7077! 19r3W0Y]e3 III - 16777�D1:tl ltemn9274 fa734007io - 14I]dCW_64J i6730.7�'YI � i5rY000!6ro 1r7'FJ7016U f6r7o00229 _ f _... ' f673^AOrJv fIIi,,3 00 16Ymmm }2011570CIX3 . f6'T]oD07To 769?�'rJOUM /S777GNPl y _--. lleP4 S 1TS4PC'S16S0 TFI0t100:0o 1af]0001&+ 5mmY.N 1Gizm7 r . aras rrt.yee v. 0.i mp 1 veen ccn527eq gY,E.i#3 S+v�41yr.T. , 'r+W4.S`?7'r?w�!�''f .x8'ecl l*ux+7R �1wa.[.ac14.1W7G6my 9on Alt lraa.ar�e.e xs 11m a x xwr}, d.• rrply r: �3 .r_ Dntin r•!. er• rri rae da1e�1" r.m. p iry►nd�' ►14 . 'f _CcmF'�►- . all n0[ C L9 • iWi .�rM4iri.a 3w: r/or'.1 rKfM9 iNT 4y 4" sr f-3W H P 1rta :7�.r .o.=:a��c :.'..' Kin County a�rbts.-s.:brag,r.xfr-.a.�.x '�k1'6'a4e�unPe:irn dl:r rl. Arr.aM k,;-m. 5ra±e*ca:l bi' va++per.yW!a d1�Cs".pwi7Y.. ..i }Q4:317 6-, :+. IUn; _,-:-]'p'Ao.. u... Prc.�rrinR'fA*''A.-..wmreeL l]11.G113bN I C— P 7 k( a KirKj �ciyn-ty Department of Development and Environmental Services Building Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Penton, Washington 92057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Web date: 04126/2007 : �. -WER AVAILABILITY: ";G COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY ERU� For alternate -Formats, call 206-29C-6600. This certificate provides the Public Health - Seattle & rang County Department and the Department of Development and Environmental Services with information necessary to evaluate development proposals Do not write in Jj Building Permit ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Preliminary Plat or PUD ❑ Rezone or other. Name Applicant's name: _Y_ ZH I -�- t iE Proposed use: G -y - S ! �., _ Location (attach map and legal description if necessary): Lp—r �LJp C.,) LA P_0 c A ?,flo J1. a. Sewer servicecan be provided by side sewer connection only to an existing 1 size sewer feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed use - OR x J b. Sewer service will require an improvement to the sewer system of. / Li b b feet of sewer trunk or lateral to reach the site; and/or ❑ (2) The construction of a collection system on the site; and/or (3) Other (describe): �V lE U6CE-CZ G<z-r'- is ,� F c/ 2. 15� a. The sewer system improvement is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. OR ❑ b. The sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. ✓ 3. ® a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city_ OR ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to provide service. r ^. Service is subject to the following: a. Connection charge: '1_7) ��% Cps�Gv�•j _ b. Easement(s): PC 5t Jl • c". G. Other: 64_ r(50-vicp CFa ti �Gv +l ten) of- Steil l ce The Distr ict, at its sole discretion. reserves five right to delay or deny 5en"er service based upon Capacity limitations in District and Other Purveyor f::cilities. I certify that the above sewer agency information is true. signature. Ignatory na e Signature Date LAKEFfX LIEN U'PILITY DISTRICT.' Agency name Title This certification shall be valid for one year from, date of sever wailabilityform.cloc b-cert-sewer. pr07-_002 Page -I of I Ilf 02- � Sewer Availability Map Sewer Main - Sewer Manholes 0 )600 Development Engineering +1- 400 Feet SW SW 3 SYl NOTE: Lakehaven Utility District neither warrants nor guarantees the accuracy of any facility information shown. Facility locations and conditions are subject to field verification. ,� ----- - 0 \ il 416%00407 41,671000-60 �. 4166600476 3M6 ` 0121039047 1 30 � 416560� 0 � Q SW 304TH ST 416560Q647 ■ 0 6,600648 T 416660OW ■ �� 30428 ■ ■ 4166600580 4166600646 30411 30420 o, s�o ■ -�y 2 08 . r • • ~ w '9y 4166600655 �" " w� • • 4166600591 �� 0 r� 30427 4166600590 2940 4166600595 4166600657 0 30444 s x- � ■■ it-k .r_�■-f['rr��a-fir =�c-.m -� 41666006GO 0 4166600661 4166600605 0 N d y 4166600670 N 4166600608 30541 0 b 1221039105 3203 4166600610 2902 *USM� OTE. Lakehaven Utility District neither warrants nor guarantees the accuracy of any fatalityinformation provided. Facility locations and conditions are This Box is 1" L0n9 sMect 10 field verification. 4166600674 30702 41666006.15 0 416660 71 4166600620 0 62.5 125 0 Feet Sewer Facilities This Ccr iVf cate provides the Please return to: Depart nett of l-lealtl-, of?d BUJLDI\IG & LAND DEVELOPlvIEN; T Buildinc & Land Development 450 Adrniuistration Building with u:;oin2etion necesseiry to Seattle, Washington 9S104 evaluate develot: rent rnt•000sals, 206-344-77900 KING COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF V'ATER.AVAILABILITY Do not write in this box name E--'Tiilding Permit ElPrelimirrary Plat or PLD ❑ Short Subdivision ❑Rezone or other _ APPLICANTS PROPOSED USE r- j:) LOCATION 3jpy +p ed P `Vl G 6 6"d oC ao (Attach map & legal description if necessary) WATER PURVEYOR INFORMATION ). aL48d Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing S A-6 inch water main fee;: from the site, OR b, Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: feet ai,"vater mall] to reach i11e site; and for (-) the conSU"uct:on of a :I r.stribu dun symni on the Site; and for ❑ (3) other (describe)_ 2. a ORL76J 7`11e Water system is In conformance with a Coumy approved water comprehensive plan. b. n The water system improvement will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. 3, a. The proposed prgject is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of -'service ouLside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. OR b. ❑ Annexation or BRB approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. a. Water is/or will be available at the rate of flow and duration indication below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant 3.2a f feet from the buildingiproliert:y (or as marked on the attached map): Rate of Flow Duration ❑ less than 500 g,pm (approx. __gpin) Jess than 1 hour ❑ 500 to 999 gpm 52-4 hour to 2 hours �100 gpm or more FOR ❑ 2 hours or more flow test of _ gpm ❑ other 1] calculation of ___nm (Commercial Building Permits require flow test or calculation) nR b. 71Water system is not capable of providing fire flow. COMMENTS/CONDITIONS I hereby certify thar the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for onc;.year from date of sienahire, _6 r�whl aA,�s�E A enc% Name e,#r Signatory Name ti WoM., N/A 711 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 4858 14 'S' AC CL 150 LID: 54-88 7 co C3 < CV3 co .346 13' Q An 4T- C17Y OF Federal June 21, 2013 Mr. Aleksandr Adzhigirey 32022 5`' Avenue SW Federal Way, WA 98023-5615 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South FederaWay l Way, WA 96003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cdwffed&vkay.com Re: File 413-102462-00-AD; CRITICAL AREA DESIGNATION REVIEW Adzhigirey, 32022 jth Avenue SW Dear Mr. Adzhigery: On June 6, 2013, the City of Federal Way's Department of Community and Economic Development Services received your request for verification of any critical areas located on the above -mentioned property, parcel #416660-0600. After investigating documents and files associated with the zone in question, the subject property is Mapped as being within the following areas: Landslide hazard area Erosion hazard area Category III wetland Landslide ha--ard areas are considered geologically hazardous areas and are regulated as such Wider Federal Yt'cry Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.160, "Geologically Hazardous Areas." Erosion has-ard areas are considered geologically hazardous areas and are regulated as such under FWRC Chapter 19.160. ('afegv)y111 wedawz areas are considered geologically hazardous areas and are regulated as such under FWRC Chapter 19.175, "Regulated Wetlands." All the above -mentioned chapters can be readily viewed and are available on the city's website at %"v-,v.citvoffederalwa -.cant. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at CDvalunteer cr?r ci offederaiway.com or 253-835-2643. Sincerely, ftece Golz Planning Intern ' Catcgorization is based on a quick analysis and may be subject to change upon further review. Doc :6356S CONTACT HYFORMATlON APPLICANT: ALEF SANDR ADZHiGIREY 32022 57H AVE- SW, FEDERAL WAY, '.NA 98025 253-661-356-' S RGEY 206-790-291I cLrey'u@holmai1-mm ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT: J. S Jones and Assoclates, Inc PO Box 190E Issaquah, Washington 98027 253-905-5736 jeH jsjan @-m—t net 30 DATER F—pF Iy Aran 1.7R2 02 —pc+6 4 la' of ill iAl�H A YEG GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 9 r..ch 20 rc Im uril_sTY �ese.�llT I Y 7RPh ASP '�W LEGAL- -lot 4, blocF according recorded It PAGE 33,;NIW MAP COON T Y,ALE V gl� S Fr 10 VIILII I' Tr"pora�y $£}[�H� Vlti4� Iiry=4tt Arc¢ 3YB sF � ' SB'I•.kFla_ES 28'RSR- L Q IS'f6LE 'LE ' 0: 0 o � VI f`J S D z C s l � o 1 {jIJ f / li I I i I—� V] Cd w OO i �U�a I ti '> Z con L4 I= N Z � I C ,Y V 1 � �a Ifl N t• o � rWi1 F ` � / Ji O I o _ g U m LL IL N 6 C 'A1+ LA1 > W ¢ T I W N (n 1 O It N 'C �W a m zzm �;p©y5 m yv � uI CV U i 2 0 Y) r- 'ti 2 A 4 t>�a Par+r ELEVATION + I .2 03 E D APPao-xaAA � O \ 1 STOCKPILE Z 1 1 LOCATION C 1 I 1 (TYP) m 1co 9, I�LA 1 1 1 � 1 `C3 +, l 1 I 1 DRAIN-252 SO` SLOPE TO DRAIN E \ F a z 0 2' MIN MOTH VARIES PER I —--2X4MK)----- Q 2- ACP OVER FIRM UI NYEI NATIVE SUBGRADE OR AS OIHEF INDICATED PER ARCHI cs - CL 0 W Z vU Z € o w w � z F Lu W w �q G ss G 5 77NM l w Z U) Z F— w Lu LD � � Z W(J)o Lu>a10 a3�: 0 w 0c)a N :3: Z I CL J 2 N o0 p tr)w Q LL I SHEET TITLE: DRIVEWAY SECTION CIVIL GRADING 8 DRAINAGE PLAN HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG SHEET NO. —800-424-5555 C-� $ SECTION I TOWNSHIP 21 RANGE 03 E W.M- _—I Single phase, simplex demand dose or timed dose, float or C-Level" controlled system for pump control and system monitoring. The IFS simplex control panel is desigried to control one 124, 208, 240 VAC single phase pump in water and sewage Installations. The panel features an easy -to -use touch pad with display on the inner door for programming and system monitoring. The panes configuration can be easily converied in the field to either a timed dose or demand dose. The optional C-Level°` sensor is a pressure transducer that senses the liquid level In the tank and sends a signal to the IFS panel. Pump activation levels can be adjusted by using the panel touch cad. C-Level" sensor operating range is 3-39.9 Inches (7.6-101..3 cm). J M ti. A. Level Status Indicators illuminate when floats or set points are activated. Alarm will activate if a float operates out of sequence. B. HOA (Hand -Off -Automatic) Buttons control pump mode with indication. Hand mode defaults to Automatic when stop level or redundant off level is reached. C. Pump Run Indicator illuminates when pump is called to run. D. LED D is play shows system Informal! on including: level in inches orcentirnefers (C-Levei' only), mode, pump elapsed time (hh:mm), events (cycles), alarm counter, float error count, timed dose override counter ((imed dose only), and ONJOFF times (timed dose only). E. NEXT Push Button toggles display. -F. UP and SET Push Buttons set pump ON!OFF times (timed dose only) or activation levels (C-Level'" only). 1, Enclosure Base measures 10 X 8 X 4 inches (25.4 X 20.32 X 14.18 crn). NEf,r1A 4X (ultraviolet otabilized thermoplastic ydth ramovab€e mounting feet for outdoor or Indoor usa). Note: Options, v❑I',age, and amp range selected may change enclosure size and component layout. 2. Red Alarm Beacon provides 360` visual check of alarm condition. 3. ExtarlorAlarmTestlNormall5ilenceSwitch al€owshorriand lighttobetested and horn to be silenced in an alarm condition.Alarm automatically resets once alarm condition is cleared. 4, Alarm Horn provides audio warning of alarm condition (83 to 85 decibel rating). 5. Circuit Breaker (optional) provides pump disconnect and branch circuit protection. 6. Power Relay controls pump by switching electrical lines. Definate purpose eon actor used when pump full load amps are above 15. 7. Float Connection Terminal Block 8, Incoming ControllAlarm Power & Pump Terminal Block 9. Control Power IndicatorlFuae indicator Fight illuminates if control power is present in panel. Alarm will activate if control fuse Is blown. 10. Alarm Power IndicatorlFuse indicator light illuminates if alarm power is present in panel. 11. Ground Lug NOTE: Schematicring Diagram and Pump Specification Label are located inside the panel on enclosure cover SEE BACKSIDE FOR COMPLETE LISTING OF AVAILABLE OPTIONS, SEE PRICE BOOK FOR LIST PRICE. Model Shown 1F311 W114WAC Reg. Cdn PaL &TM Off ,. jff Entire control system is UL Listed to meet andlor exWed industry safety standards 1' Dual safety certification for time United States and Canada N Standard package includes: Demand dose - three 20' SJE MilliAmpMaster— control switches Timed Dose -two 20' SJE MilliAmpMaster— control switches Complete with step-by-step installation instructions U AV Three-year limited warranty C us LISTED L' Rhom, p PO Box 1708, Detroit Lakes, MN 56502 1-888-DIAL-SJE • 1-218-847-1317 1-218-847-4617 Fax email: sje@sjerhombus.com 1vto W.sierhori]bus-com D�E] W MODEL IFS MODEL TYPE e1 = SPLX TIMED DOSE (includes option 8AC standard) 2 = SPLX DEMAND DOSE (includes option SAC stand2 d) ALARM PACKAGE---- J 1 = alarm package (includes test normal/silence switch, fuse, red light & horn) ENCLOSURE RATING— I W = NEMA 4X STARTING DEVICE e1 = 1201208/240 VAC 9 = 120 VAC PUMP PULL LOAD AMPS 0 = 0-7 FLA 1 = 7-15 FLA 2 = 15-20 FLA C PUMP DISCONNECTS 0 = no pump disconnect 4 = circuit breaker 120 VAC (must select starting device option 9) 120/2081240 VAC (must select starting device option 1) SWI T CH APPLICATIONS H = floats (Timed dose = timer enable and alarm / Demand dose = stop, start, and alarm) (select 17 option) X = no floats tinted dose demand dose C = C-Level' sensor (must select 24 option) (select option 3E and/or 4A & 4D for high water alarm and/or redundant off floats) timed dose demand dose Not_: Pump down applications o 1iy. OPTIONS Lisladcelow CODE DESCRIPTION iJ Duo alarm inputs 3A Alarm flasher 3a Manual alarm reset 3E High water alarm float (must select 17 option) (Available only wl,. an switch Applications = C) 4A Redundant off (select option 4D if !lasts sra required) Demand Dose Timed Dose 4D Redundant off float (must select 4A option) (must select 17 option) 6A Auxiliary alarm contacts, form C 8AC Display board Includes: ETM counter, events (cycles) counter, alarm counter, and override counter (timed dose only). (Included as standard.) 10E Lockablelatch - NEMA 4X 1QF Lightning arrestor (must select purap circuitbroaker, control and alarm power combined) 10K Anti -condensation heater 11C NEMA 1 alarm panel (must select option 6A) CODE DESCRIPTION 11 D NEMA 4X alarm panel (must select option 6A) [] 1 SA Control /Alarm circuit breaker Q 16A 10' card in lieu of 20' (per 8oal) [] lea 15' cord in lieu of20' (perfloat) 0 f 6C 30' cord in lieu of 20' (per float) Q 1615 40' cord in lieu of 20' (per float) [� 17C Sensor Float° / internally weighted A (per float) �} 17D Sensor Floato/ extemally weighted A, (perfioat) Q 17G MilliAmpMaster`/ pipe clamp ■ (per float) 17H MilliAmpMaster"/ exiemally weighted i (per float) 0 17J Sensor Float°l pipe clamp A. (parlloat) 0 18A Timer override float (timed dose fioat panel Only) 24E C•Level" sensor with 4' vent tube and 20' cord 0 24F C-Level' sensor with 4' vent tube and 40' card 24G C-Level'" sensor with B' vent tube and 20' cord 24H C-Level" sensor with 8' vent tube and 40' cord Mechanically -activated A, Mercury -activated 3AMPLF MODEL Z1=5 1 1 W 9 1 1 0 Model Type Alarm Package Enclosure Rating Starting Device Pump Full Load Amps Pump Disoonnects SWitCh Appllcation Options: Display, Lockable Latch, SJE MMIArnpMastei /pipe clamp OSJE' Rhombus GSIN v :.. `a UNNO >6!-'Qz >>y < O{Oz>�> < pnp �->, y A Z j�A>GeNm n �brnA0 ���6> < - 2 n _ > O - N ml1�CNini. z>Or 'Z ��yj�nOrnF �N OnzoNP� onCrlFnK><<,� yzyi��zzrn CONK'-TnlTn �rngzr=n�rn� �o(�aOzr"o�m5 npOap Z'am0$ ZGO N2AmC r .NOrn�zA�C c�Tn> �N• n: Cn"`V pO SOS R� O� >A 2.60 n � �0 Wn�OQ`A Arno OF0a��2 00 �tuorn� ,po0 2 W Z ICnN �O�z<W Oz in fiA0-00r Tn �Z?N-C)N r1 OCz� >A 5N A C n c> 0y 00 `� nnLL�'•zzQ= y 1 T 2 r m T y N -yp C,n > l? D C> Z y ZZ�CiOyN� cOi�<Ao pz �"c3 -nmW.�y�n=S2 7- o=S n0>nm' OC��rn y02 n y > 7 Cy z Zn'o> N> K A� K n K A aOv�z Srn np W T g i Z p ao0K� vA z �a ��z O >Ro Qm <nmt NOr'�� O2 y FE pm GO Z n W N _ Dy0 W OOOe>Jwy�O�yDO m m��OSD�vy� A�"A'O nn�pC7AN cyN�rp Oyp�Dm? -Wi 0 3➢ 0 Z W � m 0 K�5'z-a Z>O Sn n n y C) � � y O' AN�-iy O P.iOxo or v a mo F mU0 O Fs'oN_ . y> Z20S� W �QDZr m 0000 Won qoo ul >f >y.y, 7 U y o N r'All KZ v >�� n � Z > rn>�ODN CAA <� nnF O �Op30 z O?Nn ncz�' rzy.-.��Arnz N•C > y S C n ��z Oyu 0 O �a�yaT NNr�rn- -NON??�nyUvNc N r 003-y3 �Nr�v p�z -O DO OOrnUjZ>yQnry All- 'v>��@ Da�Oy-C�?yZf>1 QK'z 51� lcoou yE�n z�3r^i noa� �ncOAoO _ z won Itl z K��rC',., NA �y O Z�rnC N0 zh- -; s5 o zno� oa 0 =4 oCA C� O > N l y G2' BZP- 1 500 E=" 57P-1 500 T 49" 114LET h -EIGH T r N yn -Oy O _ "> �m TAn pn71 m i NA 01, ? �DO CNN DOS 0 O Or 099 N rn Z O_O> r Z ao J { G nbn 11 0 - > 1 > n N 7➢ rn N Z Z 79 o.� 7 4l N rn I k Q E K ENGINEERING INC- DATE: TANKDcTALSFORMODELS 6/17/10 DRAFTED BY: BZP-1500 & BZP-1500 T P.O. BOX 3097 BATTLE GROUND, 1fVA 98604 D.R.N. PHONE: (360) 687-7668 FAX: ( 360) 687-7669 SCALE: r� I N T 5 NORTHWEST CASCADE, INC. - -- y- • -- =---- ------ V` l I N t W N �mz�0 y�-N-Irn> c� aCarnoy�zo� r>y n��n��t -'SNjrnA�rt•� C psi' cO�Cy <GN> 06Oz�r y�> nCCoo�===^'O➢ �m� NrnC>�:li r KNOtnii�?A�O >F no�OzsA ma 0, ?� Zzoor 00�= Ct _�OC> OD _ Gz n� �nNrn>�O z� nc�a�oo� T� �Sz U,cntn > c oOzrn gN z �z jo so yy o cO p O � m N O�'Lci�rq'-• rz ��O,GT rrirn CG�z9RVU' G �.CD ONn > G c>�sc , 3RyoC{tn n S > O > O y C- ^Co n a '•Rcn9610 o O rtUma zz Q 0 v z- Cc rn Z N �Nlf �n�OAOC `Ak`A z� Q1,D .�i N >$u*; > CQ20 a n (Dl T C- G Z ti Z p > � i-O D z nm LA ?cncPi� i') �- g.mN �N �1 q �° Q a N. S G .. 's b q Y A�'gccii �°� Oz N ,T gnu �� Z zca^7 �a O rnOj n J G i�. G zsg NO Ov N > O� O 9ry Orn� G G2" 522- 1 500 5" B22- 1 500 T 52- INLET HEIGHT N Z O > O A / �? O NA O�N A y�yO lull N [`j 1, JI S 1 D` ti S o C N }St[f 71 � N O C�- O 1 p N 49' I4• MIN & MAX i 3.1� yOCnj�yO b T z ?fivrn�p �O��CC � ,per„ �nrc to rym0l15 7G1 ;' ^ A 7 .. nrnE or NUD} 0O➢A v � �A'r��'❑ii a y OON L.I <?a 18" MAY• � .4'MINo,n� o Cr%m1O Z�O 7 a D O0 l BNB rno Lsl �nz 00 � aD�y�$ o rZrn AF OUTLT HEIGHT n S 0 Z N nrn� SOD T Z N Gy�bT� g » n Z = T ti Z y A O � '�G10 n�,p o ray Z gk�> zo O Np4>'1 orn, rnC3 �L >=>5 rn70 O("1 L O ��I r~r mN r• 2 S �S o A x r• O S w X r E K ENGINEERING INC. DATE: 6/16110 TANK DETAILS FOR MODELS DRAFTED BY: BZ2-1500 & BZ2-1500 T m P.O. BOX 3097 BATTLE GROUND, WA 98604 D.R.N. PHONE: (360) 687-7668 FAX: (360) 687-7669 SCALE: NTS NORTHWEST CASCADE, INC. SP50 PUMRICRARACTERISTICS PumpJMotor Unit Suhmersible I°laoual Models !Ill h117 ill H6 H3 H4 P'16 Automatic II oriels Al- A2 Au omatic At[ Br. ABl - norsepawer 112 Full I oad Amps 12.D 5.7 6.0 4.1 3.6 1,0, 1.4 Motor Type Split Phase Three -Phase R.P.M. 1750 Phase 0 1 3 i l;aaE li 2H 230 2UG 23D 460 575 rEftZ DD Temperature 140°F Ambient NNIA Design A JIS" & ie Sit? 2" I, 1'ri std. l3, OQ> [So"tds andbog I l i '2" 70 lbs. iSP50AB1 77 lhs.1 crier Cord 1613, STM . l o 115V, 230=10' std. (20' opdonall 1614, STWA, 3o 200V, 230V, 46DV, or 575V = 20' sid. MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION Handle Steel Lubficatina Oil Dielectric Oil A'I tal Aousia Cast Iran' Pum Casin Cast Iron' Shaft mcw Kee Steel L1aahenical Shad Seal Seal FacFs: Carhan/Ceramic Seal Body: Bf888 Spring: Stainless steel Eellot,,s: Bunn-h Im ?ill Cast Irar Da oaf BBarina Bronze SlegV2 LOW2i Bee, Inc 51n le Roav Batt Baad a;;e,i-r Stainless Steel I44 -, - s fg PERFORMANCE DATA 32 64 Y6 ita CAPACI Y-U.S. G.P.M. D.IMENSQNQL PA TA 4-31r 1-119" 1111! 5.91a• ;eat! i5t�l� P" ["] HPT 4-sis, D15CHARGE 11171 4` IZF 7.5/1 s' [ii51 Is" r4571 MINIMUM SUMP DIA. IcU n� 4 It- . [3f 1! rimy 12-1a DICNARGS I3251/16" 12-7/1 [" HlOH7 1315] = 5-rn- l7G�! DUHP OFF Alt di`ntnsicns In inches. hLltic for in! n_liana use compcn.ent d1;MtMkw rmr my i liZ'r'=h. DIM- asicra' dala not for construclinn petPose urdes certified. OiroonIroai:ad rw`Vk1r= appro., et, and Off,IE`lei 23jUSi71,'le. USA CAAIAD.^. 2951YB G I T STFEET, D'=WAf4, 4VI 53110 ";'`'VIP%•hYDROh'I?.TIC,COiA .267 TRILLIL)IM DRIVE, KI TCHENER, OV I ARiO, C NAD 11v2u3 ul'%5 p!.l,agg-957-6677 ORDzRS`FAX:800-426-`r46c PH:519-896-21e3 ORDERS FAX:5i4-89c-n337 because we are continuously Improving our products and services. Pentair rese, ',s the right t., change spacfficati,ns wr,:iput prior nr,tice, _ " Pacta._:d, AI'. FTchls F_.ervedl I IF ANY TREES 114 THE DRAINFIELD AREA 1 SHALL BE REMOVED, CONTACT DESIGNER I PRIOR TO REMOVAL. 1 1 I 2GO LINEAL FEET OF 34" WIDE INFILTRATOR5. j USE 1 1/4" 5CH 40 PIPE FOR LATERALS. j LATERALS TO BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 7' r I ON CENTER. ORIFICES TO BE ON THREE FOOT CENTERS FACING UP. " �25% SLOPE + 478.66' o N v rn w N i I HM $O.ul CI 10, T r ON-51TE WETLAND AREA 501L LOG TAKEN 1 0/05/ 1 3 BY KEITH PELZEL 5L 1 00-02" DUFF 02-25" ROOTED BROWN MEDIUM SAND 25-GO" BROWN MEDIUM SAND 5L 2 00-02" DUFF 02-30" ROOTED BROWN MEDIUM SAND 25-GO" GREY MEDIUM SAND 5L 3 00-02" DUFF 02-24" ROOTED BROWN MEDIUM SAND 24-48" BROWN MEDIUM SAND MOTTLING @ 34" MAXIMUM DAILY FLOW = 570-GALLONS PER DAY OPERATIONAL CAPACITY = 3GO-GALLON5 PER DAY T--r— PR PRETREATMENT "B' RESERVE DRAINFIELD AREA CONSISTS OF 1-44 G 5QUARE FEET FOR 723' OF DRIP LINE. (2' CENTf-R5)DRIP LINE LENGTHS FROM WEST TO EAST 25, 2G, 27, 29, 30, 3 1 , 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 21, 22, 35, 35, 35, 34, 34, 34, 34, 34, 33, 33 IF RESERVE 15 EVER INSTALLED, INSTALL A NUWATER BNR-GOO ATU TANK AS SHOWN IN RED. w o N a N 122' OF 2" 5CH 40 PVC TIGHTUNE -o o- 5 FUTURE ATU TANK I OI L4. 5L3 C3 ON -SITE WETLAND AREA O w PROPOSED 4 BEDROOM I SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 1 570-GPD n ---------------------------- i I I N llD N CONTROL POINT IlON = 133.32 r _ t � L5TCRM INFILTRATION DESIGNED BY P.E IZE511DFWTIAL 506LA-1595 NGTH PARAMETEP-5 I 5EPT] TANK EFFLUENT RAN E MG [-,-,,RESUBMITTED+ lit CODS 130 CBODS APPROXIMATELY 108- 191 NORTH JUL 0 7 2016 _ �r T55 49-1 50 0 # G 10-25 rTTv 00 04' DUFF � 'I��'I .a".P� 04-25' ROOTED BROWN MEDIUM SAND SEAT TST. IE- I G COUNTY Y M 25-54" BROWN EDIUM SAND E T. F PUBLIC HEALTH 5L 5 00-04" DUFF 04-24" ROOTED BROWN MEDIUM 5 JD �_ 2�� J�' E 24-G4' BROWN MEDIUM SAND - 5L G. CI 00-04" DUFF 04-22" ROOTED BROWN MEDIUM SAND 22-G2" BROWN MEDIUM SAND 0 F FEDERAL WAY 60` 30' CDS T1i16 IS NOT ASLIRVEY. SITE y-EATURES• TOPOGRAPHY, ELEVATIONS & BENCHLtARKSARE BR5EC ON ASSUMED DATUM PROVIDED BY THE OWNER 8 COUIiTY RECORDS &ARC INTENDED ONLY FOR THE APPROVAL & CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION OF THE SEPTIC SYSMA DESIGN. WESTSIDE SEPTICCESION RECOLILIEHO5 THAT A LICENSED ,,CONSTRUCTION BE USED TOSET CORNERS, ESTABLISH LOT LINES & OETIF,RLMNE ELEVATIONS. LOT LINES PROVIDED To WESTSIDE SEPTIC BY OYfNER, WEBT$IDE A$SUMES NO LIASRITY FOR LOT LrNS DUdEIISIONS ORACCURACY SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN'` PLAN SITE ADDRESS 30444 28TH AVENUE 5 PARCEL NUMBER 41 GGG0-0000 LOT NUMBER 4 OF LAKOTA ADD BLOCK G A T �r��r1�� �/�/ CLIENT 5ERGEY ADZHIGIREY - 20G.750.291 I 32022 5TN AVE 5W - SEPTIC DESIGN LLC. FEDERAL WAY, WA. 98023 KEITH PELZEL 253.208.9078 OWNER SERGEY ADZHIGIREY - 20G.790.291 I KEITH@WE5T51DE5fFTIG.COM 32022 5TH AVE SW BRIAN POTUCEK FEDERAL WAY, WA. 98023 253.732.3792 BRIAN@WE5T51DE5EPTIC_C0M DATE 05-1 G- I G PAGE 2 OF 3 1008 12GTH ST CT E. TACOMA, WA. 98445 GRAVELLE55 TRENCH DETAIL CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND WSDOH. MINIMUM 1 2" MINERAL SOIL COVER REQUIRED HEADER MAN I FOLD DETAIL THIS SYSTEM REQUIRES PERIODIC MAINTENANCE AND AN OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY. THE CERTIFICATION OF THE TRENCHES EXCEEDING 30 DEPTH REQUIRE VENTS DESIGN AND INSTALLATION DOES NOT INSURE CONTINUOUS TROUBLE -FREE SERVICE. - - rrNJ5ht0 GRADE TO DRAINNELD THIS 15 NOT A SURVEY. PROPERTY LINES, CORNERS, TOPOGRAPHY, ELEVATIONS, AND BENCHMARKS ARE BASED ON A55UMED DATUM AND ARE SOLELY -- FINE SAND COVER UN 12' LOAMY ER. PRESSURE LATERALS INTENDED FOR USE BY THE SEPTIC 5Y5TEM DESIGNER, COUNTY REVIEW PFR50NNEL SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLWE5T51DE SEPTIC DESIGN RECOMMENDS 2PROFESSIONAL LICENSED SURVEYORS FOR SURVEY PROJECTS. " { ;:: FINE S - - - PVC OB PORT RISER WITH LOCKING LID } OFJGB+AL GRADE NO EXCAVATION OR ALTERATION AFFECTING THE DRAINFIELD SITE I5 PERMITTED. ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE DRAINFIELD AREA MAY RENDER THE SITE UNUSABLE. RE -DESIGNS AND/OR ECONOMIC LOSSES DUE TO DAMAGFJENCROACHMENT5 TO BE AT THE OWNERS EXPENSE. GiAVALE55 CHAMBER FLOW CONTROL VALVE MIN 08' SLOTS A5 DRAINFIELD TRENCHES TO BE A MINIMUM OF 5-FEET FROM ALL SEPTIC TANKS, PROPERTY 4 EASEMENT LINES; 10 FEET FROM BUILDINGS WATER LINES; 100 ;26D NAINI5M REQUIRED FEET FROM WELL CASINGS. Uri Pv[ I Im.PAL%%AEuup- ALL WATER LINES MUST BE I8-INCHES ABOVE CROSSED SEWER LINES AND SLEEVED IF WITHIN I O-FEET OF ANY SEPTIC SYSTEM COMPONENT. THERE ARE NO ::TYPE 3 ly I EXCEPTIONS TO THI5 REQUIREMENT. INSTALLER TO DIVERT ALL STORM DRAINAGE FLOW AWAY FROM SEPTIC 5Y5TEM COMPONENTS. a THIS SYSTEM 15 NOT DESIGNED FOR THE USE OF A GARBAGE DISPOSAL. THE USE OF SUCH A DEVICE WILL CAUSE SEPTIC SYSTEM FAILURE FOR WHICH THE LONG SWEEP OWNER ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY. 38" 90 DEGREE 56" VERTICAL SEPARATION ELBOW WASHED ROCK NO CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS ARE TO BE MADE TO THIS PLAN WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE DESIGNER. HEALTH REGULATORS MAY X.DRAIN SUMP MAKE RED LINE CHANGES AS DISCUSSED WITH DESIGNER. THE IN5TALLER/CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE DESIGNER IN THE EVENT OR DISCOVERY OF POOR 1 SOIL, HIGH WATER TABLE, OR DISCREPANCIES FROM THE ORIGINAL PLAN 4 SOIL LOG. WORK PERFORMED UNDER ALTERED SITE CONDITIONS 15 AT THE 1 INSTALLERS RI5K AND THE DE51GNER AND COUNTY HEALTH SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS, THI5 PLAN 15 FULLY COPYRIGHTED. TRANSPORT PIPE FROM PUMP CHAMBER INSTALLER MUST CONTACT DESIGNER FOLLOWING INSTALLATION FOR FINAL A5-BUILT INSPECTION. INSTALLER 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR PRESSURE TESTING € PROVIDING TEST CERTIFICATION. ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS DUE TO IMPROPER INSTALLATIONS WILL BE CHARGED TO THE INSTALLER. ALL CHARGES MUST BE PAID PRIOR TO REQUESTING ADDITIONAL INSPECTION. MONITORING CLEANOUT PORT DETAIL (TYPICAL) THIS SYSTEM IS DESIGNED FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH 4-BEDROOM5. MAXIMUM DAILY WASTE WATER FLOW SHALL NOT EXCEED 570-GPD WITH A MONITORING PORT TO BE SECURED TO CHAMBER FOR O4M PURPOSES MAXIMUM WASTE STRENGTH OF 200 mglL BOD5; 100 mcg/L T55; * 15mgIL FOG. EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM LEVELS WILL CAUSE SEPTIC SYSTEM FAILURE FOR CAP WHICH THE OWNER ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY. 1500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK DETAIL (TYPICAL) F � 7"Awlm Rw naS3 �c¢ss ------ -- r- '1 PUMP TANK DETAIL 1 500-GAL (TYPICAL) T- EMERGENCY 8„ `•I fi30-GPD 1 1 I`IIII LI SNT R } I HIGHWATER ALARM IFILTEE l } f} f 21- f1 1 I I I I aFFRLaAr ' 1 1 RmurroNn orr � I 1 V8• (63D-GPG) .--. �- — .•-.. .•--. .--� ..� .� .-_. L4.8-GPI _ 1 .--• — — I HYDROMATIC 5P 50 PUMP CURVE 30 5F50 2d SP40 10 o 20 40 an An Inn Ipn I .r J �Ill�lli i IAx� a Mil `III=jmIII= li�lli 111"`I I i14�16111�,' :lllitl :i 1:111.7Ii111 i1�=11x�-,'ri(lan o Ii�.#J�f oi1[i�i� PVC h05E OR LONG J wn"i,ce�wev.nei SWEEP ELBOW f wrwuw,�rw. ELEVATIONS THE CALCULATED 501L LOAD RATE 15 0.8-GALLON5 PER SQUARE FOOT PER DAY. THE REQUIRED DRAINNELD ABSORPTION AREA 15 713-5QUARE FEET. —MIN IV INSTALL 2GO-LINEAL FEET OF 1 .25-INCH PERFORATED PVC PIPE. LATERALS TO BE INSTALLED LEVEL WITH CONTOURS. SEE TRENCH DETAIL FOR TRENCH DEPTH, BACKFILL MATERIAL MATERIALS AND DIMENSIONS. IF DRAINFIELD STAKING 15 REQUIRED BY THE COUNTY, A STAKING FEE WILL BE CHARGED TO THE OWNER. ALL DRAINFIELD TO BE INSTALLED BELOW FILL MATERIAL, OR, BRIDGED. INSTALL 2GO-LINEAL FEET OF ADS ARC 3G LP 8 INCH CHAMBERS. NO REDUCTION HAS BEEN TAKEN IN THE GRAVEU.E55 CHAMBER PRIMARY 5SA5. INSTALL HEADER MANIFOLD TO MAINTAIN EQUAL DISTRIBUTION. PRE55URE LATERAL A5 SPECIFIED INSTALLER SHALL P05T PERMITS IN A CONSPICUOUS LOCATION DURING CONSTRUCTION. MISSING PERMITS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSTALLER. INFILTRATIVE 5URFACE A FEE WILL BE CHARGED TO THE INSTALLER TO REPRODUCE LOST/ MISSING PERMITS UNDISTURBED 501L LOT SIZE 15 APPROXIMATELY 1 .02 ACRES, OR, 44,8GG+/- SQUARE FEET, 6' PVC PORT. 1 DRAIN PLUG5 EXTEND TO BOTTOM OF GRAVEL TO MONITOR. PONDING SEPTIC TANK SHALL BE STATE CERTIFIED, WATERTIGHT, TWO -COMPARTMENT TANK WITH A MINIMUM 1500-GALLON CAPACITY. 24" RISERS WITH COMPATIBLE WATERPROOF LOCKING LIDS ARE TO BE INSTALLED OVER MANHOLES TO FINAL GRADE. G' RISERS WITH SCREW CAPS ARE REQUIRED OVER INLET AND OUTLET PORTS_ SEPTIC TANKS, WETWELLS AND SEWER UNE5 UNDER DRIVING 5URFACE5 MUST MEET D.O.T. H-20 CRU5H-PROOF LOADING SPECIFICATIONS. TANKS IN WET AREAS MUST BE 5EALED. INSTALL A BIO-MICROBIC5 BRAND 5NT41 G EFFLUENT FILTER IN THE SEPTIC TANK OUTLET PORT. INSTALL TEE HANDLE TO FILTER WITHIN G INCHES OF TANK LID. WEIWELLS TO BE 51NGLE-COMPARTMENT, WATERPROOF TANKS WITH A MINIMUM 1 500 GALLON CAPACITY. TANK5 MUST BE STATE APPROVED. ALL PUMP CHAMBERS SHALL HAVE A 24" WATERPROOF, CHILD RF-515TANT P15ER WITH COMPATIBLE LOCKING LID AT FINISHED GRADE. THI5 SYSTEM WILL USE A RHOMBUS IF5 CONTROL PANEL WITH TIMER TO REGULATE FLOWS FROM THE WETWELL TO THE 55A5. SET TIMER TO D05E 95- GALLONS EVERY 4 HOURS. WETWELL DRAWDOWN TO BE APPROXIMATELY 2.73-INCHE5 PER DOSE. INSTALLER TO VERIFY D05E AMOUNT BY PERFORMING DRAWDOWN, ;RUN TIME * SQUIRT TESTS. TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE DESIGNER FOR INCLU51ON WITH THE A5-5UILT. ALL CONTROLS SHALL USE SWITCHES, FLOATS, TIMER, CYCLE COUNTER AND ELAPSED TIME METER COMPATIBLE WITH THE PUMP AND AUDIONISUAL ALARM. SET PUMP Tq D05E G-CYCLES PER DAY AT 95-GALLON5 PER CYCLE. SET HIGH WATER ALARM TO ACTIVATE AT 735-GALLON5 ABOVE'.THE REDUNDANT OFF FLOAT. I TRANSPORT LINE TO BE 122-FEET OF 2.0-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE. DRILL 3/ 1 G" HOLE IN TRANSPORT LINE LOCATED IN PUMP TANK TO PREVENT SIPHONING TO DRAINFIELD WHEN DRAINFIELD 15 LOCATED AT ELEVATION LOWER THAN PUMP. INSTALL CLEAR UNION IN PUMP CHAMBER. MANIFOLD LINE TO BE VARIOUS LENGTH5 OF 1.25-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE. INSTALL HEADER MANIFOLD AT OR ABOVE HIGHEST LATERAL AND INSTALL CHECK VALVES BETWEEN LATERALS TO PREVENT BACKFLOW TO LOWER LATERALS AND PUMP TANK. LATERALS TO BE 2GO-FEET OF 1 .25-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE INSTALLED ON MINIMUM 7-FOOT CENTERS. ORIFICE DIAMETER TO BE 3/ 1 G-INCHES ON 3 -FOOT CENTERS SPRAY UP. TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD 15 12.90-FEET. LIFT 5.00, TRANSPORT 4.90, MANIFOLD 1 .0, RESIDUAL 2.0 REQUIRED PUMP CAPACITY 15 CALCULATED TO BE 5 1 .13-GPM. THE WETWELL PUMP SHALL BE A HYDROMATIC 5P 50 OR EQUAL. DE51GN CONTROL POINT 133.32 HOU5E5TUB-OUT 125.00 SEPTIC TANK INLET 123.50 SEPTIC TANK OUTLET 123.25 d0 SEPTIC SYSTEM SPECIFICATION 51-1EET WESTSIDE PUMP TANK INLET 123.00 SEPTIC DESIGN LLC. KEITH PELZEL PUMP ELEVATION 1 13.00 253.208.9078 KEITH @ WF5T51DE5EPTI C. COM HEADER MANIFOLD 107.75 BRIAN POTUCEK DRAINPIELD INVERT 107.00 253.732.3792 BRIAN@WE5T51DE5EPTIC.COM 1006 1 2GTH 5T CT E. TACOMA, WA. 98 51TE ADDRESS 30444 28TH AVENUE 5 PARCEL NUMBER 4 1 GGGO-0000 LOT NUMBER 4 OF LAKOTA ADD BLOCK G CLIENT 5ERGEY ADZHIGIREY - 20G.790.29 1 1 32022 5TH AVE 5W FEDERAL WAY, WA. 9,5023 OWNER 5ERGEY ADZHIGIREY - 20G.790.29 1 1 32022 5TH AVE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA. 98023 DATE 05-1 G- I G PAGE 3 Of 3 CONTACT INFORMATION APPLICANT: ALEKSANDR ADZHIGIREY 32022 5TH AVE, S.W. FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 253-661-3564 SERGEY 206-790-2911 cLrey@hotmail.com ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT: J S Jones and Associates, Inc PO Box 1908 Issaquah, Washington 98027 2539055736 jeB.jsjones@comcast net so' p 19"MAPLE CALCULATED �5 C3 CENTERLINE 12 PLE O �- 0 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 fL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: lot 4, block 6, lakota addition, according to the plat thereof recorded in volume 21 of PLATS, PAGE 33, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan Parcel No. 416660-0600 NW Quarter, Section 12, Township 21 N, Range 8 E 28th Ave. S., Federal Way, Washington — 418.1' — — LOT 3 SITE 30X 28th Ave SIN 1 � 1 wortrll VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE encin with 9 , EDGE GFJI ASPHAL1I SigI I City Owned O \ K. 4. la� Right of Way ti (shaded) �l srP 4 SGl — tN�1 u c 15.1[ wide drive end •ny si Approx 20-ft wide driveway end T.B.R. 20• N - ! N t.kienr P 1 LE C rran ncsI. I SuoP1y., ` 'r - ylf o SPLlt R It t F1 {I �0 P , draOMg x ' !" O I Slit Fence a S 1 f C 1 noB "R�j trhlphl ehis only - STEP R r WALL i j i l / Wetland Flag A-97 1 , /ro LOT 5 RESUB1MMED JAN 04 20if- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Lt U o � o U Cd cd Q� 0 ti z CA W U W ^O 30 CV A^1 W � o IA co ^c c o — IN� t IN 0 (A C trK ,L 0 or, m o N � 1• N 0 1M M Al Y/ N 1M v z w d wa o a m w Z m c m w m U m w c u n N' Q a LLI N �0 j �T- 0 VJ r ) T Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan Parcel No. 416660-0600 NW Quarter, Section 12, Township 21 N, Range 8 E 28th Ave. S., Federal Way, Washington 1.0 Executive Summary The applicant proposes to construct one single-family residence, driveway, utility connections and dispersion trenches for drahlalle, in the 100•R wetland buffer. Impacts to the weir d buffer are unavoidable for reasonable we or the property. The tool permanent hurler impact ip 10,7 is s£ The applicantproposed a d,630 si-wetiand buffer irnpaetto accommodate a 1.400 sf lontprint singie•fam ily residence, dispersion trenchm driveway. 15 ft bull&ng setback Zinc (bsbt) on tho back of the residence and 5 ft bsbl on the side of the residence. Utility services, gas, water will connect from the 28th Ave. S-W. rigbt-of-way. The approved septic drainfidd buffer impact is 3,450 sf. Thedminfield location was wtest because it has the twit suited soils for the drainfreid. The peer ani septicdrainfield imps+; t will be the same regardless of the location in the wetland buffer. Relocation of the septic drainfield would require a new septic design, health department fees and a lengthy rc",w process. Ten trees will be removed from the septic dWoffeid aria- Replanting naliw'C shnrhs and trees o%vr the scplic droinfield is not allowed by the health department, because roots could damage the system. The permanent infiltration trench impacts are 152 sf 1.1 Goals and Objectives • The goal for reasonable use of the property is w aw-oid, minimize and compensate for impacts. Dime welEaud impacts, i.e. filling or wd lands, are avoided. However, wx4iand buffa impaels arc unavoidable. • Utllitlea, locludirt4 water, gas, electric and phone will connect from the 28th Ave S.W right-of-way. to avoid wetland and wmixtd buffer impacts. The driveway is located to minitnixe grading impacts and provide a reasonable driveway gradient from ilia strxt The hsbl, between the wclland buffs and house u proposed to be S fact, to slues buffer Impacts on the side closer to the wetland. On -site buffer replacement is not feasible -Septic system and infiltration trench supply pipelines will be installed with a trencher, in a method that retains the existingvcpdatiop. • The remaining wetland and wetland buffer will be placed in a protective easement. Wetland signs will be posted on a split rail fence along the wetland buffer. • A notice on title for the critical area will be recorded on title. 1.3 Impact Analysis Proposed Buffer Impact 6,630 sf Septic Drainfield Buffer impact 3,450 sf Infiltration Trench Impact 152 sf Total Buffer Impact 10,232 sf 2.0 Project Location The property is located at 304XX 28th Ave. S.W., Federal Way, Washington 98023 3.0 Responsible Parties Property 0— AlexAdzhigirey 32022 5th Ave SW Federal Way, WA 98023 Phone Number 206-790-2911 CjJey@hotmail.com Environmental CopauRant J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. At": Jeffery S. Jones, PWS P.O. Box 1908 Issaquah, Washington 98027 253-905-5736 4.0 Standards All work and materials shall conform to City of Federal Way standards and specifications, and to the specifications and details shown on these plans- 5.0 City of redmrl Way Contact Ccrud" actions within this milia4liDnrCn4faraliun plan require iaspeetlan or approval by City of redrral way stiff. Rcqucsrs for inallccliDa'approvai xhall becoordlnated Waugh the City of Federal Way staff. 6.0 Contractorinformatlon When it is available, contact information shall be provided to City ofFedeml Way that includes names, addresses and phone numbers of pensons/fsrms that will be responsible for clearing and grading. i z 0 U MWM Y/ m E of CO U nr cu E C L ro o O N�� yC -0 N N t` o 01 C ";- CD � N Q m L W 1M N mN In N 1� am N �Q z LitZ rr o n m o o i c U � K LLl O i O RESUBMITTED N IpN 0450 U O = O CrrYOFF�MLWAY (D Z (n N CONTACT INFORMATION APPLICANT: ALEKSANDR ADZHIGIREY 32022 5TH AVE. S.W. FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 253-661-3564 SERGEY 206-790-2911 cLrey@hotmall com FNVIRONmmmTAL CONsuLTANTs J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc PO Box 1906 Issaquah, Washington 98027 253-905-5736 JeB.Jsjones@comoast-mt 4 f w3 3-2FiPLES 0 U7 Z O ^; A I 0 T GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 ,D zD ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 fL Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan Parcel No. 416660-0600 NW Quarter, Section 12, Township 21 N, Range 8 E 28th Ave. S., Federal Way, Washington SITE R 3041XX 28th Ave SW {� m A T `a xawrx VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE roe•ce�n�•r / ` �� � —��� i tv 2' M1L L: R 17• �Lc �'3 � ,' lylyal \�9 Category It Wetfand 14'4119Efj� . i4' Ait T2'F PLE 2-15°A-TJCR IS' A _ 18"MAPLES S' C'K 15'CEDAR �Vi. " "' 19-HPMLLICK ErM- AP 32''r�L—CK -. . C3 PG'MAPLE 12'HEMLOCK f 1Pi.E 24'MAPLE �14'MAPLE 18'MAPLE T.B.R. \ 1.5 � S " \ 2A'HAr'LL "-SuAALE i 21CA 5't:APL� �', 11'HENLOCK L&^Mf�FLc � r 584' ' 46b-34' ?74DER T N N C Z �;I w NOV 30 2016 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY W (V I I � 1f l � r r^ V, e— f Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan Parcel No. 416660-0600 NW Quarter, Section 12, Township 21 N, Range 8 E 28th Ave. S., Federal Way, Washington 1.0 ExetnsiYe Summary Theappkigai proposes m cnnsmur dnc singlo-fwnily rcaideott, dHYc+agy, uti]ay conncctSoos and dispersion trencbcs for drainage, in ft 100-A wcrtand buffer. Impacts to the wetland buffer are unavaidab[e for reasonable use of Ox prvper[y. The aWkMAt ProPDMd a6,630 sf wetland buffer impact to accommodate a 1,400 of foolpeira single-family residence. dispersion wmcbo, driveway, 1S It bonding setback line (Wbl) on the back of the rrsidcace and 5 li bsbi on the side oflho residence. W llity services, gas. wntc less 'milt wouvect from the 28th Ave. S.W. riot•of-way. 1.I Goals and Objectives • The gold for reasonabk use of the proptxty it to avail, mioimiae and campcnsmw for im ta. All wnfand impacts ara awed. Wetfmd and hnffcr impacts for utili�ies.Incinding ow ter, gas, electric and phone will not camtect m Dash Point Road. to avoid wetland urdaad huffer imparts. Thu driveway is iom" to menindw grading impacts end provide a driveway gradient from the street. The bsbl between the wctlwd buffs and house will proposed to be 5 frtt to reduce buffrr impacts on rite lice closer to the wetland- On-sitc buffer replexmcnt is not feasible. The rcmeining wMand and }rctlond buffer will be placed in o plotectivt easlmtnt. Wetland signs will be posted on a apOt rail fence along the svctWA buffer. A notice on title for the critical area wile be recorded on title. IX 13 Impact Analysis (.] v j Proposed Buff"Aadalli it 6,630 sf T 2.0 Project Location The property is located at 304XX 28th Ave. S.W., } Federal Way, Washington 98023 S I'l; YHiWI 3.0 Responsible Parties � 1 ^vl Property Owners Alex Adzhigirey 32022 5th Ave SW Federal Way, WA 98023 Phone Number 206-790-2911 Ci-rey@hotmail.com Eavironmao Ia1 Caastdtaas J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. Attn: Jeffery S. Jones, PWS P.O. Box 1908 Issaquah, Washington 98027 253-905-5736 4.0 Standards All work and materials sball conform to City of Federal Way standards and specifications, and to the Specifications and details shown on these plain. 5.0 City of Fedcr�f Way Con [Act • 1i aw� e'c'P-,seA . Cerwin actions within this, F6a r Mntiori�lon m*tipa jwpecteoa or approval by City of Federal way staff. Requests Tar mspne t val shall be ea trdlnaicd through the City of Federal Way staff. 6.0 Contractor Information When it is available. cantos[ informa km shall be provided to City ofFcdcral Way that includes names, addresses and phoae ntuabera of pars wfimu that will be responsible for clearing and grading. z U m C G rrt arrw IL O Q mcc IL I� 7 NV v C aG Q ffi SI o O i U ol�l RESUBMMED W W NOV 3 0 MEJ N 1 ai of FEDoSaatwav U O = O cn Z C0 CV V AZHIGIREY Ft I ENCE FEDERAL WAY, WASNGTON ABBREVIATION'S ACP Asphaltic Concrete Pavement °/ With N NcrN(ing) ADD'L Additional WT Weight NO (j) Number AD Area Drain WWF Welded Wire Fabric OC On Cents AW Adjacent YD Yard Drain O/W Oil Water ANSI Amrrmco, Nat;4aa! standard' lrn:tul� EOUN Equnalent P Po.°` OWNER CIVIL ENGINEER APPROX Approximate(y) EVC End or Vertical Curve PC Point of Curvature SERGEY ADZHIGIREY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING, PLLC ARCH Architect(uroll EXIST Existing Fly, Pont Indicator V.I. 32022 5TH AVE. SW. PO BOX 446 ti I mo;. rt ���� ASSY Assemby ID FDC Fluor Drain Fire Department Connection PP PL or C Poser y U Property Una FEDERAL WAY, 98023 TACOMA, WA 98401 ►a..rxr4r/� r BLDG Building BM Benchmark FDN Foundation PSF Pounds Per Square Foot (253) 228-0513 ` it —T BNDRY Boundary FIFE Fnleh Floor Devotion PSI Pounds Per Square Inch WWW.DE-CIML.COM BVC Beginning of Vertical Curve FH Fire Hydrant PT Point of Tangency PoWnyl Chloride Puy': SOurrJ �? C Cable IVFL Flanged PVC C&O Curb and Gutter FUR Floor PVI Point of Vertical Inflection 3 >q E CB Catch Bosin FOG Face of Curb OTY Quantity RK m.aa " an' CC Concrete Curb FS Finished Surface RAD (R) Radius CD Concrete Drive FT (' ] Foot (feet) RCP Reinrorced Concrete Pips SITE r Xlffnlrf CF Cub. Feet (Fact) FIG Footing RD Road 21 x Cl Cast Iran G Gas Main REF Reference 1kt"00 f;m mlll� CJ Construction Joint GB Grade Break REOD Required ,. F;a$eml Way swmr ti CL Class GIRD Grade RET Retaining a or t center U. ,N cote Valve ROW ftigM of Way LEGAL DESCRIPTION'� 'i~ CMP Corrugated Metal Pipe HB Hose Bibb SHT Sheet LOT 4 OF LAKOTA ADDITION BLOCK 6 crs, e.r.ar. IOU aiIE>Jr —�° ° s CONC Concrete HOPE High Density Poyethyleoe SIM Similar � r'� eb CONST CanucU.n HORIZ(H) Hari—ftl SPEC Speclficaticn(e) � CPEP Corrugated Polyethylene Pipe HT Height S"A Station SITE ADDRESS Ill maTN sr CM Cerder(ed) HYD Hydrant SO Square \ e ! dT~ CY Cuba Yard ID Inside Diameter SS Sanitary Sesar 30444 28TH AVENUE SW.ararx� DCVO Double Check Val. Assembly IE Invent Elevation SO Storm Drain Par atrTN sec k� DDCV Double Detector Check Val. IN (') hch(es) SID Standard PN: 4166600600 ^y . �r etTFH ST - DEFT Department INV Invert TOE Toe of Wall, or Slope `t r� DET Dealt IRR Irrigation Water T Telephone Who DIDuclge Iran LB Pound(') TO Telephone Conduit DU (e) Diameter LCPE Uned Corrugated Poyelhylene Pipe TOC Top of Curb OM Dimension LF Linear Feet TG Top of Grate DS Dom Spout MAIL Material TOMP Temporary DWG Growing MAX Maximum TOP Top of Wall, or Slope V I C I N I Tl� M A P East(mg) E East(ing) MFR Manufacturer N Television Wirt T,1 �Y EC Electrical Conduit WIN Manhole TP Typical N SCALE.' N75 ECC Extruded Concrete Curb MJ Mechanical Joint VC Vertical Curve ELEV Elevation MIN Minimum VENT (V) Vertical EDP Edge of Pa.merd MISC Micah —us WM Water Meter BENCHMARK AND DATUM CONSTRUCTION SEOUENCE CONTRACTORZSITE PLAN NOTE LEGEND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS SHOWN ON PLANS ARE TO BE STORM PIPE �— — - :0r 7 wAU/TDC n WAI: D Nu DATUM IS ASSUMED t. FLAG CLEARING LIMITS AS SHOWN. VERIFIED HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. 2. INSTALL TEMPORARY QUARRY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ALL EXISTING FEATURES INCLUDING BURIED UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS CATCH BASIN ■ A%9 G u `-------- TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS BASED ON KING COUNTY GIS AND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHER'S AND HAS BEEN GENERALLY 3. INSTALL FILTER FENCE CLEAR AND GRUB SIZE INSTALL TEMPORARY ARE SHOWN AS INDICATED ON RECORD MAPS AND SURVEY CONFIRMED IN THE FIELD BY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING, PLLC FRO51tlN CONTROL MEASURES (SILT FENCE) AS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES INFORMATIONFURNISHED BY OTHERS. WE ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR 3:1 I7— PERSONNEL, (SEE CONTRACTOR NOTE). PRGGRES5. ADDITIONAL FILTER FENCE MAY BE REQUIRED AROUND THE THE ACCURACY OF THOSE RECORDS AND SURVEY, FOR THE FINAL STCRU MANHOLE Q a O SLOPE INDICATORS — --Trli PERIMETER TO PREVENT SILT LADEN WATER FROM LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IN AREAS CRITICAL TO CONSTRUCTION RP RAP LEAVING THE SITE CONTACT THE UTILITY OWNER/AGENCY. THE PROMDED SITE PLAN A SURVEY, IT IS THE OWNERS RESPONSIBILITY SANITARY SEWER PIPE 4. ANY AREA STRIPPED OF VEGETATION, WHERE NO FURTHER WORK IS ANTICIPATED FOR A PERIOD OF 7 DAYS (2 DAYS DURING WET SEASON), DOES NOT REPRESENT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL ENCUMBRANCES LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE Q Fl_TER FABRIC FENCING X X SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH THE APPROVED EROSION & PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SEDIMENT CONTROL METHODS, (E.G., SEEDING, MULCHING. NETTING, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL METHODS.) WATER MAINS • w RAIN WATER LEADERS (RWL) 5. REMOVE EXISTING BUILDINGS, ROUGH GRADE SITE, CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY & RESIDENCE. �+'(q FIRE HYDRANT OC AFA T CUEANOUTS (C.O.) SS AND RWL a a RESUBMITTED U B M ITTED five HYDROSEED AND MULCH AND AMEND ALL EXPOSED AREAS. o 'AES WATER METERS 9 INTERCEPTOR AND BIO—SWALES 7. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES ONLY, AFTER ENTIRE SITE IS STABILIZED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS PASSED. WATER VALVES N CEMENT ODNCREIE 8. CLEAN ANY SILT THAT HAS ACCUMULATED IN THE PERMANENT STORM JUL U 7 DRAINAGE SYSTEM. 12016 1 FITTINGS WITH THRUST BUMS� Y m � � � STUBBED & PLUGGED LNE P of wnly, c^ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS SURFACE WR AN➢ OOE DIECTION FLa'e .. EXTRUDED CONIC. CURB _— _ _ f EXISTING CONTOUR LABELS — — ' W�&`��" ' SHEET INDEX ro�,AL���� B/z3/t5 PROPOSED CONTOUR LABMS ASPHALT CDNVE PAVEMENT TITLE SHEET & VICINITY MAP 7ss.5 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN........................................................... C-1 GROUND SPOT ELEVATIONS (TENTHS) 7555 SHORING WALL — GENERAL NOTES &DETAILS........................................................... C-2 FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATIONS (HUNDMTHS) COORDINATES. & LEVIERS F 755.75 155Se rs ROCKERY WALL CONCRETE RETAINING WALL GENERAL NOTES &DETAILS........................................................... - SHEET N0. V _ O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 A APPROATMATE CON5TR1ACnoN/a.eARIN1i � ' 1 i i � � 1 ^ APPRO]DMATE LOCATION OF SILT FENCE. LIMITS, NO CLEARING BEYOND PROPERTY 1 1 / / I ACTUAL =AIM TO BE DETERMINED I 5 + / IN FIELD AS CONSTRUCTION LINES OR WITHIN SEPTIC DRANFlELD AREAS WITHOUT APPROVAL (TYP) PROGRESSES SEE 2/C2 (TYP) CONSTRUCTION 0 o 'ra V ENTRANCE SEE 478 +/- 8 2 1 7 CON UVATIDN DRIVEWAY , SPPXLE ❑ i1OD'#T II 1 LOCATION LID X 1 ' °r_° + I f �\ L `� ` 1 � �. PROPOSED rDswcx S i I � ! amilo TR66 1 1 I VRDOF AREA- ,4705OFT C 1 I I 1 + ; R \\ \\ A -�� SEE DETAILS 2/C-] , 1 IMANL FEE= 1 I Itak 1 �\ WERAND AREA ; +r 11 \ r ` f \ R�.aIFT/Fr 466 TRENCH \ f T \ L CONNECT ROOF DRAINS TO DRAIN=252.80 1 WETLAND BOUNDARY \ SEDIMENT CONTROL SLOPE 1D DRAIN D 1 S®SL=0.02FT/FT (MIN) ' \ \ OR 6-PVC ® SL= (MI; `� \ 1 \ E �\ 1 �\ \ , \ GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FM 1 Inch = 20 lL F 0 0 2' MIN WIDTH VARIES PER ARCH PLAN (IS MIN) 2%(WL) SITE STATISTICS I I _ —fl r-f ^I �� LOT AREA = 47,134 SOFT OR 1.06 ACRES L I Ijji ij` I� i ~� CLEARED/WORK AREA = 17.940 SOFT OR 0.41ACRES 2' ACP OVER FIRM UNYIELDING FUTURE BUILDING AREA = 1.430 SOFT G NATIVE SUBGRADE OR AS OTHERWISE EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY = 2,100 SOFT INDICATED PER ARCHITECT DRIVEWAY SECTION SCALE: SCALE : NTS CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 U a J F- s () Z sW I a� � W W 0 W a IiT � J o� G a vTJ6"+ruM1 �j LEJ U 3:o Z N �— w Lu ( 7 (n w cn o w > a S a�C) 0 I— %0 N C7 � J N o0 p MW Q LL SHEET TITLE: CIVIL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN SHEET N0, C-1 El SECTION 1 TOWNSHIP 21 RANGE 03 E W.M. ii 1 2 GENERAL NOTES: (1) ALL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS, THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CODE (OOFW), ROAD STANDARDS (COFIHRS), WASHINGTON STATE DOT (WSOOT) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND THE CONDITONS OF PRELU (NARY APPROVAL IT SHALL RE THE A SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER TO CORRECT ANY ERROR, OMISSION, OR VARIATION FROM THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN THESE PLANS. ALL CORRECTIONS SHALL BE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST OR LIABILITY TO THE COK. (2) THE DESIGN ELEMENTS WITHIN THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REV4EWIED ACCORDING TO THE COFW ENGINEERING REVIEW CHECKLIST. SOME EIEIAENTS MAY HAVE BEEN OVERLOOKED OR MISSED BY THE COFW PLAN REVIEWER. ANY VARIANCE FROM ADOPTED STANDARDS IS NOT ALLOWED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY COFW PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. (3) APPROVAL OF THIS ROAD, GRADM PARKING AND DRAINAGE PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF ANY OTHER CONSIRUCOQN (E.G DOMESTIC WATER CONVEYANCE, SEWER CONVEYANCE, GAS, ELECTRICAL, ETC) (4) ROM ANY CWSTRUCTION OR DEYE.CPAENT ACTIVITY, A PREOONSTRUCRON MEETING MUST BE HEIR BETWEEN THE COFW LAND USE INSPECTION SECTION, THE APPLICANT, AND THE APPUCANYS CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATIVE B (5) A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. (6) CRAZING ACTVTES (SITE ALTERATION) ARE LIMDED TO THE HOURS OF 7 A.M. TO 7 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY AND 10 A3L TO 5 PAL ON SUNDAY, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED WITH A WRITTEN DECISION BY THE REVIEWING AGENCY. (7) IT SHALL BE THE APPUCANYS/CQNTRACIDR'S RESfPg4S18ULITf TO OBTAIN ALL CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS NECESSARY BEFORE INITIATING OFT -SITE WAIL EASEMENTS REQUIRE RENEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. (0) DATUM SHALL BE COFW UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. (9) ALL UTILITY TRENCHES AND ROADWAY SUBGRADE SHALL BE BACKFILLEU AND COMPACTED TO 95 PERCENT DENSITY, STANDARD PROCTOR. C (10) OPEN CUTTING OF EXISTING ROADWAYS FOR NON -FRANCHISED UTILITY OR STORM YURH[ IS NOT ALLOWED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY COFW AND NOTED ON THESE APPROVED PLANS. ANY OPEN CUT SHALL BE RESTORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH COFW. (11) TIE CONIM M" SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRCVIOING ADEQUATE SAFEGUARDS, SAFETY DEVICES, PROTECTIVE EWPMENT, FLArG7RS, AND ANY OTHER NEEDED ACTIONS TO PROTECT TIE LIFE, HEALTH, AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC, AND TO PROTECT PROPERTY IN CONNECTION NTH THE PFRFOWANCE OF WORK COVERED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY WORK WITHIN THE TRAVELED RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT MAY INTERRUPT NORMAL TRAFFIC ROW SHALL REQUIRE AT LEAST ONE FLAGGER FOR EACH LANE OF TRAFFIC AFFECTED. MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) SHALL APPLY. WORK IN RIGHT-OF-WAY IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN IS APPROVED BY COFW. p STOCKPILING SOIL NOTES I. STOCKPILES SHALL BE STABILIZED (WITH PLASTIC COVERING OR OTHER APPROVED DEVICE) DAILY BETWEEN NOVEMBER 1 AND MARCH 31. 2. IN ANY SEASON, SEDIMENT LEACHING FROM PILES MUST BE PREVENTED. 3. TOPSOIL SHALL NOT BE FLACID WHILE IN A FFpO2EN OR MUDDY CONDITION, WHEN THE SUBGRADE IS EXCESSIVELY WC1 OR WHEN COf1311HIHS EXIST THAT MAY BE OTHERWISE DETRIMENTAL TO PROPER GRADING OR PROPOSED SODDING OR SEEDING. 4. PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED GRADES ON THE AREAS TO BE TOPSOILED SHALL BE MAINTAINED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLAN. E F INSTALL DRIVEWAY CULVER IS A ROADSIDE DITCI 6' MIN. DEPTH 4'- G rAvHG ROAD 3 I 4 STORM NOTES: (1) PROOF OF LIMUTY INSURANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF FEDERAL WAY (ODFW) PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES. PREFERABLY AT THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. (2) ALL PIPE AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE LAID ON A PROPERLY PREPARED FOUNDATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSODT SPECIFICATION& THIS SHALL INCLUDE LEVELING AND COMPACTING THE TRENCH BOTTOM, THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION MATERIAL, AND ANY REQUIRED PIPE BEDDING, TO A UNIFORM GRADE SO THAT THE ENTIRE PIPE IS SUPPORTED BY A UNIFORMLY DENSE UNY€LDING BASE. (3) STEEL PIPE SHALL BE ALUMINIZED, OR GALVANIZED WITH ASPHALT TREATMENT #1 OR BETTER INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. (4) ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, SUCH AS CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES, NOT LOCATED WITHIN A TRAVELED ROADWAY OR SIDEWALK, SHALL HAVE SOLID LOCKING UDS. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED WITH A PERMANENT RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY SHALL HAVE SOLID LOCKING UDS. (5) ALL CATCH BASIN GRATES SHALL CONFORM TO COFW STANDARDS. (6) ALL DRIVEWAY CULVERTS LOCATED WITHIN COFW RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE OF SIIFFICIETRT LENGTH TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM 3:1 SLOPE FROM THE EDGE OF THE DRIVEWAY TO THE BOTTOM OF THE DITCH. CULVERTS SHALL HAVE BEVELED END SECTIONS TO MATCH THE SIDE SLOPE (7) ROCK FOR EROSION PROTECTION OF ROADWAY DITCHES, WHERE REQUIRED, MUST BE OF SOUND QUARRY ROCK, PLACED TO A DEPTH OF 1 FIDOT, AND MUST MEET THE FOLOWING SPECIFICATIONS 4'-8'/441F70R PASSING; 2'- 4' ROCK/307r40R PASSING; AND -2' ROCK/10%-20% PASSING. INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH COFW ROAD STANDARDS. (6) DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR DRAINAGE SYSTEMS DESIGNED TO CONVEY ROWS THROUGH INDIVIDUAL LOTS. (9) THE APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE LOCATIONS OF ALL STUB -OUT CONVEYANCE LINES NTH RESPECT TO THE DIMITIES (E.G. POWER, GAS, TELEPHONE, TELEVISION). (10) ALL INDIVIDUAL STUB -OUTS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE LOT HOME OWNER. (11) ALL DISTURBED PERVIOUS AREAS (COMPACTED, GRADED, LANDSCAPED, ETC.) OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE MUST DEMONSTRATE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: THE EXISTING DUFF LAYER SHALL BE STAGED AND REDISTRIBUTED TO MAINTAIN THE MOISTURE CAPACITY OF THE SOIL, OR; AMENDED SOIL SHALL BE ADDED TO MAINTAIN THE MOISTURE CAPACITY. (12) SEASONAL CLEARING IS LIMITED BETWEEN OCTOBER 1 AND MARCH 30 INCLUSIVE, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED WITH A WRITTEN DECISION BY THE RENEWING AGENCY. (13) IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR BUILDINGS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL DRAINAGE FACULTIES ARE 'IN OPERATION. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOTES 1. MATERIAL SHALL BE 4' TO 8' QUARRY SPALLS (4' TO 6' FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY LOTS) AND MAY BE TOP DRESSED WITH 1' TO 3' ROCK. 2. THE ROCK PAD SHALL BE AT LEAST 12' THICK AND 50' LONG (20 FEET FOR SITES WITH LESS THAN 1 ACRE OF DISTURBED SOIL). WIDTH SHALL BE THE FULL LENGTH OF THE VEHICLE INGRESS AND EGRESS AREA. SMALLER PADS MAY BE APPROVED FOR SINGLE FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL, AND SMALL COMMERCIAL SITES. 3. ADDITIONAL ROCK SHALL BE ADDED PERIODICALLY TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION OF THE PAD. 4. IF THE PAD DOES NOT ADEQUATELY REMOVE THE MUD FROM THE VEHICLE WHEELS, THE WHEELS THE VEHICLE SHALL BE HOSED OFF BEFORE THE VEHICLE ENTERS A PAVED STREET. THE WASHING SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA COVERED WITH CRUSHED ROCK AND WASH WATER SHALL DRAIN TO A SEDIMENT RETENTION FACILITY OR THROUGH A SILT FENCE JUL WIDTH INMESSIEGRESS AREA CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 SCALE : NTS 5 SILT FENCE NOTES a) THE FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PURCHASED IN A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT TO THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID USE OF JOINTS WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE SPLICED TOGETHER ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST, WITH A MINIMUM 6-INCH OVERLAP, AND BOTH ENDS SECURELY FASTENED TO THE POST. b) THE FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED TO FOLLOW THE CONTOURS (WHERE FEASIIE). THE FENCE POSTS SMALL BE SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 6 FEET APART AND DRIVEN SECURELY INTO TIC GROUND (VINIMUM OF 30 INCHES). C) A TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED, ROUGHLY 8 INCHES WIDE AND 12 INCHES DEEP, UPSLOPE AND ADJACENT TO THE WOW POST TO ALLOW THE FILTER FABRIC TO BE BURIED. d) WHEN STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC IS USED, A WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY TO THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF THE POSTS USING HEAVY-DUTY WIRE STAPLES AT LEAST 1 INCH LONG, TIE WIRES OR HOG RINGS THE WIRE SHALL EXTEND INTO THE TRENCH A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES AND SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 36 INCHES ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE e) THE STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE STAPLED OR MIRED TO THE FENCE, AND 20 INCHES OF THE FABRIC SHALL BE EXTENDED INTO THE TRENCH. THE FABRIC SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 36 INCHES ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE FILTER FABRIC SHALL NOT EIE STAPLED TO EXISTING TREES. fl WHEN EXTRA -STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC AND CLOSER POST SPACING ARE USED, THE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE MAY BE ELIMINATED. IN SUCH A CASE, THE FILTER FABRIC IS STAPLED OR WARE) DIRECTLY TO THE POSTS NTH ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF STANDARD NOTE E. APPLYING. g) THE TRENCH SHALL BE BACKFlLLED WITH 3/4-INCH MINIMUM DIAMETER WASHED GRAVEL h) FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHIN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE, BUT NOT BEFORE THE UPSLOPE AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. I) FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL ANY REWIRE) REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES: (1) APPROVAL OF THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL (ESC) PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF PERMANENT ROAD OR DRAINAGE DESIGN (LG. SIZE AND LOCATION OF ROADS, PIPES, RESTRICTORS, CHANNELS, RETENTION FACILITIES, UTILITIES, ETC.) (2) THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE ESC PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, REPLACEMENT. AND UPGRADING OF THESE ESC FACILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPUCANT/ESC SUPERVISOR UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION IS APPROVED. 13) 111E BOLNOARES OF THE CLEARING LIMITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE CLEARLY RAGGED BY SURVEY TAPE OR FENCING, IF REQUIRED, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION (SWDM APPENDIX D). DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, NO DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE PERI0117ED. THE CLEARING LIMES SHALL HE MAINTAINED BY THE APPLICANT/ESC SUPERVISOR FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. (4) STAMIUZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSIRUCTKDN AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATON OF THE PROJECT. ADDITIONAL MEASURES, SUCH AS CONSTRUCTED WHEEL WASH SYSTEMS OR WASH PADS, MAY BE REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT ALL PAVED AREAS ARE KEPT CLEAN AND TRACK OUT TO ROAD RIGHT OF WAY DOES NOT OCCUR FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. (5) THE ESC FACILITIES SHD%N ON THIS PLAN MUST BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL CLEARING AND GRADING SO AS TO ENSURE THAT THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT TO SURFACE WATERS DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES IS MINIMIZED. (6) THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, THESE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE UPGRADED AS NEEDED FOR UNEXPECTED STORM EVENTS AND MODIFIED TO ACCOUNT FOR CHANGING SITE CONDITIONS (E.G. ADDITIONAL COVER MEASURES, ADDITIONAL SUMP PUMPS, RELOCATION OF DITCHES AND SILT FENCES, PERIMETER PROTECTION ETC.). (7) THE ESC FACULTIES SHALL. BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE APPUCANT/F.SC SUPERVISOR AND MAINTAINED TO ENSURE CONTINUED PROPER FUNCTIONING. WRITTEN RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT OF WEEKLY REVIEWS OF THE ESC FACILITIES (8) ANY AREAS OF EXPOSED SOILS, INCLUDING ROADWAY EMBANKMENTS, THAT WILL NOT BE DISTURBED FOR TWO DAYS DLIiONG THE WET SEASON OR SEVEN DAYS DURING THE DRY SEASON SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH THE APPROVED ESC COVER METHODS (E.G., SEEDING, MULCHING, PLASTIC COVERING, ETC.} (9) ANY AREA NEEDING ESC MEASURES, NOT REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION, SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS. (10) THE ESC FACILITIES ON INACTIVE SITES SHALL BE INSPECT AND MAINTAINED A MINIMUM OF ONCE A MONTH OR WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A STORM EVENT. (11) AT NO TIME SHAD. MORE THAN ONE (1) FOOT OF SEDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO ACCUMULATE WITHIN A CATCH BASIN. ALL CATCH BASINS AND CONVEYANCE LINES SHALL BE CLEANED PRO TO PAVING. THE CLEANING OPERATION SHALL NOT FLUSH SEDIMENT -LADEN WATER INTO THE DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM. (12) ANY PERMANENT RETL741gFI/OETENTION FACILITY USED AS A TEMPORARY SETTUNG BASIN SHALL BE MODIFIED WITH THE NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND 94AU PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE CAPACITY. IF THE PERMANENT FACILITY IS TO FUNCTION ULTIMATELY AS AN NFILTRADCH SYSTEM, THE TELTHORARY FACILITY MUST BE ROUGH GRADED SO THAT THE BOTTOM AND SIDES ARE AT LEAST THREE FEET ABOVE THE FINAL GRADE OF THE PERMANENT FACILITY. (13) COVER MEASURES WILL BE APPLIED IN CONFORMANCE WITH APPENDIX D OF THE SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL (14) PRO TO THE BEGINNING OF THE WHET SEASON (OCT. 11. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE REVEM TO IDENTIFY WHICH ONES CAN BE SEEDED IN PREPARATION FOR THE WINTER RAINS. DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN ONE WEEK OF THE BEGINNING OF THE WET SEASON. A SKETCH MAP OF THOSE AREAS TO BE SEEDED AND THOSE AREAS TO REMAIN UNCOVERED SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE COK INSPECTOR FOR REVIEW. FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN CONTINUOUS ROLLS USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO TEACH FABRIC TO WIRE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE FOR FILTER FABRIC FILTER FABRIC 2' I MIN. II wmpw B'Xl7!! '• ---II ------��-- 12' gACIfFIIL TRENCH WITH r 6 MAX. G i 3/4'_3' WASHED [TRAVEL MN. AND C11 BOTH SIDES OF LI FILTER FENCE FABRIC 2'X2'X5' WOOD POSTS, STANDARO, OR BETTER LINE FILTER MATERIAL IN B'X12' TRENCH AND LEAVE MIN. 2' EXPOSED U J W a W oa W Ill ly 0 g J U o d W Z Z N W W C9 `0 5z V J w U) CD Lu > Q 2 �y Q -3: O 10 } 'D Lu co Ix N Z LL Il L J Q N o0 Q Pr) W Q ILL SILT FENCE SHEETTITE: SCALE : NTS CIVIL GENERAL NOTES CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG & DETAILS 1-800-424-5555 C-2 //� yECf N0. S a SECTION 1 TOWNSHIP 21 RANGE 03 E W.M. SEC110N 1 IUWNSHIN Ll KANUL W t VV.M. vo vac. rnrw Ul SNIttMU Jws 10ANNQJ \ / H9N3M1 /+99t cwviim ' { , 1.30S0£4 �=V32iV 3O02i \ \ \,--•..•.,� ` , .�-� v_ 3aN30Mo 03SOdO8d �\ � � `\ � . � � \ NOILY301 + \, \ 13i 30t`Z t. .�..�. L..... Al VMOHddV 3lIdNI S \ AVM3AIMo \ _ PSOd011d N '0 \ \ \ a� I 1 Z£' = NO � =lS �JA� .�9 x \ \ � � CV) � INIDd NCO 33S 33NV211N3 NOILOnHLSNO0 \� (du) 1VAO8ddV AOHLiM (dU) zO/z MS s3SS3H5OHd SV3MV 013UNW8a Oud3S NIRLIM NO S3Nn N0110t12t1SN(iO SY m31� NI 03NIM313O 36 Ol NOaV301 lVfIL3V £-3/Z MUG 33S kL83dO?Jd CNOAM ONW3M ON 'SIIVin `3JN31 DISS JO NOLLV301 31VVID(O lddV 143N3HL NOILVNIIWNI 9NWV3M/N01L3MSNO3 3LVWIX021ddV CD IJOS OR / 1 14 L=20°01'15" R=286.46' L=100.10' I� II 10' UTILITY EASEMENT II �g6 WATER BUFFER IM ACT AREA 14' U TI I T' EASEMENT CALCULATED �� \ CENTERLINE _ 12� O 2 � n o; O g8 UTILITY BUFFER IMPACT -E SEMENT WETLAND IMPACT AREA S > AREA 8 o S 89'S9' 1 1" E ° o 0 478.66' EWER LI 12 DE 17' APLE 15 25220" . . 12" APi_E 256.48' . - . 14"ALOE 9.04 `.-. 14" AR 0"MAPL ` / 18" APLE -16"ALDER 1 "MA Xa'AA LES L 8"H ❑CK N . • SITAR.'.' 3 LE o, 15, EN}L'D�f�.'. . 8"M LE �' - ON — SI TE' a ?2'HEQLOCK . . . `�:. = . `. W . - -+ 2 'MAPLE :rWx I�I�gND AREA.'.... I ' I I 1 STOCKPILES SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 "=30' -011 ERM BALES —CONVEY RUNOFF TO APPROVED LOCATION. CUT SLOPES BURY SHEETING IN 4 IN. X 6 IN. TRENCH A ANCHOR WEIGHTS WITH STAKES MINIMUM OF B FT. SETBACK FROM TOP OF 10' MAX. SLOPE. BACKFILL WITH WASHED ROCK. �—.1 CONVEY RUNOFF TO ' APPROVED LOCATION. PROVIDE ENERGY DISSIPATION AT TOE WHEN NEEDED. �t 10' MAX. TOE IN SHEETING IN 4 IN. X 6 IN. TRENCH A \\ '{J3' MIN. MINIMUM OF 3 FT. SETBACK FROM BOTTOM OF SLOPE. BACKFILL WITH WASHED ROCK. CONVEY RUNOFF TO APPROVED LOCATION. TO PROVIDE IMMEDIATE TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION TO SLOPES AND DISTURBED AREAS THAT CANNOT BE COVERED BY MULCHING do MATTING SEP 1IC ARFA O oz EDGE OF ASPHAL SUMP W 4" DOWNSPO Y 10' UTIL11 SOLID LID' N� o �TIGHTLINE EASEMENT INFILTRATION I SOLID PVC 0 1 J_ TRENCH N \ in rc) O N Q \ tDO STEb RET. 4"M�PLYZ 1 I 'MAPL 19°59 0i 466.34 no THERE MUST BE 20 FEET OF TRENCH PER 1,000 S.F. OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (2%) - 3,773 S.F. (IMPER.) X 2% = 76' TRENCH a, WALL _ 5'-0" B.S.B.L. GRI DE E ^�4N "MAPLE �p o PMP 20'MAPLE 18"MA E T.B.R. .,• :�. MA LE T.B.R. �20" E?:. .' ,`: ✓ B. 1 "MAPLE \ 5- S"MAPLE \ \ AL K` 244"M��2 "M I " 1EDA\ 9"\� .a� FOOTING LE PROPOSED NE t wnen— HEP4L❑CK RA'n RESIDENCE BASEMENT_126.O'"Ln ;y MAIN.FLR._136.0 \ \� LI E 0 L STEP RET.N i P E 5'-0" 8' S. B. Lj RO F 0. WALL 1 / J 27"� R I I _ note: PROPGSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT ELEVATION TO BE 3' MAX. I A" nw nm-,Pr) IrJ PRESERVING VEGEI'ATIGN i LOT COVERAGE: F L rr y� LOT SIZE: ---47,489 S.F. TREE FENCING SHAD. BE A- � � HOUSE/GARAt-E: 1,360 S.F. MINIMUM CC 4' HIGH ORANGE POLYETHYLENE PORCH/PATIO: 48 S.F. LAMINAR SAFETY NETTING r RDP° DRIVEWAY/WALK: 1630 S.F. POSTS SETTING TO 2' IN�� 1 G PROTECTIVE FENCING E�55 -LENGTH PER THE DPD SITE GROUND MADE OF DURABLE t DURING CONSTRUCTION \ DEVELOPMENT INSPECTOR TOTAL COVERAGE: 3,038 S.F. METAL 'T" OR EQUIVALENT I � s �— R=25' MIN. 6.4% y-+p• 13-NCH WOOD CHIP MULCH �� ° LEGAL DESCRIPTION: MAY BE ADDED FOR ROOT PROTECTION WITHIN FENCED J AREA. lot 4, block 6, lakota addition, 2. OUTSIDE OF PROTECTIVE FENCING WITHIN AREA, PROTECT ROOTS 2-INCHES CANOPY DRIP UNE-ACTUAL FEEDER 4'-B" QUARRY SPALLSaccording to the plat thereof OR LARGER IN DIAMETER BY USING ROOTS EXTEND WELL BEYOND DRIP !!�a HAND EXCAVATION TECHNIQUES. LINE ,5 recorded in volume 21 of PLATS 3. MINIMIZE CONSTRUCTION ZONE: PROTECT GEO-TEXTILE FAF,RICJ PROVIDE FULL WIDTH VEGETATION OUTSIDE CONSTRUCTION ZONE INGRESS/EGRESS AREA PAGE 33 RECORDS OF KING BY SEGREGATING IT WITH HIGH VISIBILITY - , CONSTRUCTION FENCING. 12' MIN. THICKNESS - TO REDUCE EROSION BY PRESERVING NATURAL VEGETATION WHEREVER PRACTICABLE. STABILIZED ACCESS SHALL BE USED IN ALL AREAS OF THE SITE WITH VEHICLE TRAFFIC AND PARKING, INCLUDING PLANTING STRIPS. 01HER MEANS OF PROVIDING STABILIZED ACCESS WILL BE CONSIDERED. URBAN DESIGN GROUP B79 RAINIER AVE N. OWNER: SUITE A-200 ALEKSANDR ADZHIGIREY R E NTO N, WA 9 B 0 5 7 32022 5TH AVE. S.W. PHONE: (206) B3113-B250 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 EMAIL: ADMIN@URBANDESIG,NS.US SITE: TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 41.66600600 NW QUARTER SECTION 12.. TOWNSHIP 21 N, RANGE 0.Dc NOTE: 1). 28TH. AVE. SW WILL BE EXTENDED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF- WAY TO THE POINT WHERE THE DRIVEWAY CONNECTS. 20' OF ASPHALT CONCRETE WITH 4' GRAVEL SHOULDERS ON EACH SIDE. 2). COMPACTION TESTING OF THE SUB - GRADE MUST BE PERFORMED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROADWAY BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING COMPANY CERTIFIED FOR SUCH WORK. 1r7i%ii�i z Zz. / j%j �le�,i/ % 'n 0 --� `L _ /% % 2 < i //iii/i i 0 '' 'i'' GRAPHIC SCALE ■ 20 0 10 20 CA N (� lJ 1 O N O 04 N ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. I l I w o FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE 0 0 i I ��111 LEGEND (P) (M) N 0 __0- E-- 8" D Co 8 C DRAWN BY: AVA DATE ISSUED: 03.22.13 REVISED: FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE SET REBAR & CAP PLAT MEASURED FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE WATER METER GAS METER SEWER MANHOLE UTILITY POLE GUY ANCHORMBIM117ED LIGHT STREET SIGN JUL 0 i 2016 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS DECIDUOUS TREE WITH SIZE & DRIPLINE EVERGREEN TREE WITH SIZE & DRIPLINE WOOD FENCE SITE PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 40 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft x H 0 z 0 5 10 20 30 SCALE 1 " = 30' NE 114 OF NW 114 OF SECTION 12, T. 21 N■, R. 03 E■, W.M. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, STATE OF WASHINGTON FOUND REBAR AND CAB LS# 19635 A-29 N8959'11 "W A-30 i k-28 o t>� / A-31 U, c�1 32 T.L.# 416660-0600 Nw 4, A 27 LOT 4 a 26 �33 • i'n-12 A-25� A-10 A - rA-34 IA-226 1 z Z 24 A 1 k-'l 3 I �; l \ A 0 `fl,P A-23 -19 0 0 C34 A- ■r q� 1 g FAA-14 5 os A-18 -- — — — — — — — — — ^-,5 S8959'0 — — — -- A-4 k� — — — - -35 466.34 A-97 -2 FOUND REBAR A-45 A- 0 8 5 \ \ _ A 98 AND CAB A-6_ -38 A-39 LS# 19635 A-40 A-41 A-44 A-47 . . A�94 0.02 S \ A-37 A-42 A- -49 A-1 A-99 1 0.03' W A-43 SL4 _ A-56• - 93 \. \ 30' A-50 A-51 -53 42' A- 5 A-58 ` N A-60 � c i - A-59 FA 2 = 1 N Le, 416660 0605 A-54 A-6T A-62 4 \ A-63 rn 3 /"q_g4 - �. A �6 . A 64 C 6S O A- A- $87 \ FOUND REBAR A �0 A-68 AND CAB (-72 1 A-69 O LS# 19635A 86■p -85 \ \ TL,j 416660-0608 A- LAKCT4, ADDITION �81 A-84 ` \ rA-73 BLOCK 6 t VOLUML, 21, PAGE 33 \ \ A-80 \ 74 \ \ / A-71 -7 A-79 \ A-75 A-76 \ 1 1 \ t TLf 416660-0600 t HYDR POVERTY BAY PARK D N DUMAS BAY CENTER v N 2 -o O o SW DASH POINT ROAD 0 VICINITY MAP N. T. S LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 4, BLOCK 6, LAKOTA ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 21 OF PLATS PAGE 33, IN KING COUNDI WASHINGTON- INSTRUMEN`CATION INSTRUMENT USED: 5 SECOND TOTAL STATION. FIELD SURVEY WAS BY CLOSED TRAVERSE LOOPS, MINIMUM CLOSURE OF LOOPS WAS 1:22,000, IN ACCORDANCE WITH WAC 332-130-090. NOTE WETLAND DELINEATED BY JEFF JONES AND ASSOCIATES. o m c oWc �W �a w o gUPE WAS�j O 11332 NAi L �- a ui Iq C cc N 0 0 Q W cc cc1 0 ''WA v♦ O Ln O M M d- 4 �� N 4 X � C� 0 Ln Zcn O ■ N M M W /y G N 10, d LL C .� N � G\ 2 5 o s o 00 p� o ■ p c �N a0s ■ :c 00tC,4 ¢� � z W C,3 ' dw uz_ Z Z _m 0 � N U W �; ■ .' c � N N N [] CN .0 Lj w � �n Job NO. 14572 DATE 5 14 SCALE 1 "=30' DESIGNED WSH DRAWN EE CHECKED WSH APPROVED WSH SHEET 1 OF I CONTACT INFORMATION APPLICANT: ALEKSANDR ADZHIGIREY 32022 5TH AVE. S.W. FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 253-661-3564 SERGEY 206-790-2911 cj_rey@hotmail.com ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT: J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. PO Box 1908 Issaquah, Washington 98027 253-905-5736 jeff.jsjones@comcast.net -\ 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan Parcel No. 416660-0600 NW Quarter, Section 12, Township 21 N, Range 8 E 28th Ave. S., Federal Way, Washington S89°59'08"E �66.34' Category Il Wetland 14"ALOE 14" AR C / 18" APLE 2-16"A-c_ 18"MAPLES 8„H ❑CK 15"CEDAR 19"M-APLE C 0 19"HEMLOCK C3 12 HEMLOCK I 418.1' -`" 26"MAPLE 28th A �e 1 SW SITE a S�\ 304XX 28th A vt� 3 vv Z\ o. NORTH VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 55'-6" 20.6' p 4 _ C N 0 N O N 1 C RESUBMITTED NOV 3 0 2016 %CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS E 0 U N L z O U) w X � m m 04 w b z pU� .4 ®� � z o 7� $:� z 3 v� ct rd ox 0 z Q U z O U C C '= a N L C co Lco 0 oe E c o U �o 0O S E mc 0 L z �' U- M Yi _cod �L o(D> N 2 N (n N i� co Q mc N 13 C � a z w U w O 0 U ry d m o w m m o m 0 0O Z 0 w O -1 Z Q W o O -1 Y w _ N O � � a Q 0 0 -i o -i U -i Q O ap Uj O W W N co r v, Adzhigirey Reasonable Use Plan Parcel No. 416660-0600 NW Quarter, Section 12, Township 21 N, Range 8 E 28th Ave. S., Federal Way, Washington 1.0 Executive Summary The applicant proposes to construct one single-family residence, driveway, utility connections and dispersion trenches for drainage, in the 100-ft wetland buffer. Impacts to the wetland buffer are unavoidable for reasonable use of the property. The applicant proposed a 6,630 sf wetland buffer impact to accommodate a 1,400 sf footprint single-family residence, dispersion trenches, driveway, 15 ft building setback line (bsbl) on the back of the residence and 5 ft bsbl on the side of the residence. Utility services, gas, water & sewer, will connect from the 28th Ave. S.W. right-of-way. 1.1 Goals and Objectives • The goal for reasonable use of the property is to avoid, minimize and compensate for impacts. All wetland impacts are avoid. Wetland and buffer impacts for utilities, including sewer, water, gas, electric and phone will not connect to Dash Point Road, to avoid wetland and wetland buffer impacts. The driveway is located to minimize grading impacts and provide a driveway gradient from the street. The bsbl, between the wetland buffer and house will proposed to be 5 feet, to reduce buffer impacts on the side closer to the wetland. On -site buffer replacement is not feasible. The remaining wetland and wetland buffer will be placed in a protective easement. Wetland signs will be posted on a split rail fence along the wetland buffer. A notice on title for the critical area will be recorded on title. 1.3 Impact Analysis Proposed Buffer Reduction 6,630 sf 2.0 Project Location The property is located at 304XX 28th Ave. S.W., Federal Way, Washington 98023 3.0 Responsible Parties Property Owners Alex Adzhigirey 32022 5th Ave SW Federal Way, WA 98023 Phone Number 206-790-2911 Cj_rey@hotmail.com Environmental Consultant J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. Attn: Jeffery S. Jones, PWS P.O. Box 1908 Issaquah, Washington 98027 253-905-5736 4.0 Standards All work and materials shall conform to City of Federal Way standards and specifications, and to the specifications and details shown on these plans. 5.0 City of Federal Way Contact Certain actions within this mitigation/restoration plan require inspection or approval by City of Federal Way staff. Requests for inspection/approval shall be coordinated through the City of Federal Way staff. 6.0 Contractor Information When it is available, contact information shall be provided to City of Federal Way that includes names, addresses and phone numbers of persons/firms that will be responsible for clearing and grading. RESUBMITTED NOV 3 0 2016 CPCY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS EC U N Z O P c/? w C0 X -� m P N N w i— nQ P T- Ci Z U ^3 x � M (U W� all _Cd z Tom• Z �T�� Q J • U Z O U C C �a N L O Lco O O O = U m N W '(0 O N� L L 0 >1 ca CU 0-) a) (/)(6 >4L Q LO I= 3 O Q s N13 13 _ Z U n O J U W a. m O w m >- m O m UJ ( (q m O Q a�'i O `-L w 0) O O M `— N 0 Q 0 co J W Q Z W W CV U O = o Cn Z to CV