Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
03-102631, 03-102632
CITY OF Federal March 17, 2004 Mr. Brad Plemmons 101 T Street SE Auburn, WA 98002 Way CITY HALL 33530 1 st Way South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253)661-4000 www. cityoffederal way. com Re: File No. 03-102631-000-00-SE, PLANNING DIVISION SECOND TECHNICAL REVIEW Wynstone Preliminary Plat and CZA Amendment Dear Mr. Plemmons: The following correspondence represents the second technical review of the Wynstone preliminary plat application, by the Department of Community Development Services, which was deemed complete on September 10, 2003. This review is in response to the materials submitted on January 2, 2004. At this time, to further process the application, please address comments 1-13 below. Please resubmit six sets of any revised plan sheets and four sets of any revised technical documents. Please note that the comments below are numbered in the same sequence as the comments contained in my November 5, 2003 review letter. Several items have been adequately addressed and require no action, these items have been noted as such; however, several items identified in my November 5, 2003, review letter were not addressed and are essentially repeated herein (items 1, 7, 8, 9-2F, 9-2H, and 11). A response to item 12 is also required, based on a City staff review of the geo-technical evaluation. For your convenience, I have bolded the necessary action that you need to take to adequately respond to these items. 1. City staff supports the revised clearing and grading limits in concept; however, no written request and justification for clearing and grading for areas outside streets and utility areas was provided. As previously requested, provide a written request and justification for clearing and grading beyond the infrastructure areas identified on the revised preliminary clearing and grading plans. As previously requested, in order to facilitate City staff review of proposed grading plans, provide cross-section drawings of the proposed grading in the locations identified on the previously provided redline drawing. 2. Based on the revised clearing and grading limits proposed, staff generally supports the tree retention plan in concept; however, City staff has not conducted a detailed review of the tree preservation plan at this time. A full detailed review of the tree preservation plan will occur in conjunction with the preliminary plat review, as the tree retention standards are a code requirement. 3. Comment number three regarding a 60-foot landscape tract has been adequately addressed in concept; however, City staff has not conducted a detailed review of the proposed landscape plan at this time. A full detailed review of the landscape plan will occur in conjunction with the preliminary plat review t r. Mr. Brad Plemmons March 17, 2004 Page 2 and Concomitant Zoning Agreement (CZA) revision, as the landscape requirements are code based and CZA based. 4. Comment number four regarding a landscape tract adjacent to Tract A has been adequately addressed in concept; however, City staff has not conducted a detailed review of the proposed landscape plan at this time. Although not identified in my November 5, 2003 review, a minimum five-foot wide landscape tract is also required in front of Tract B. 5. Comment number five regarding ownership of tracts has been adequately addressed in concept. 6. Comment number six regarding pedestrian access has been adequately addressed in concept. 7. The first two bullet items of this comment have not been addressed. Provide a written response to each bullet item. Page four of the Habitat Technologies Wetland Report identifies a small isolated wetland less than 500 square feet exists on the site; however, the preliminary plat indicates an on -site wetland and identifies it as 1,029 square feet. Please reply to the following questions regarding the wetlands: 10 Please clarify the size discrepancy of the on -site wetland as identified on the preliminary plat map and wetland assessment report. ■ Was the on -site wetland actually surveyed, in order to determine the size? Note that the boundary survey does not identify the wetland. • The preliminary plat map must be clarified in regard to the wetland delineations, and identify on the�preliminary plat map the actual environmental documents developed for the wetland delineation and evaluation. This comment was not addressed in the January 2, 2004 submittal. However, the revised preliminary plat map has consolidated four proposed multi -family lots into one single parcel which could potentially yield a total of 18 multi -family units. Under the existing CZA for Parcel 5(b), a 60- foot wide landscape buffer and solid board fence is required where the multi -family zoning of Parcel 5(b) adjoins single-family zoning. The CZA also has a provision for one-third of the project to be townhouse design units. Provide a response to the comments herein regarding design and performance standards on the proposed multifamily parcel. Based on the following factors, future multi -family development on lot 45 may not be appropriate unless performance and design standards are proposed and/or implemented: 1) consideration of the current design and buffering provisions in the CZA; 2) potential incompatibility between proposed multi -family and single-family developments; and 3) the geographic location of the proposed multi- family lot. As discussed at our meeting on August 13, 2003, in order to gain City staff support for the requested CZA amendment, you will need to propose implementing design and performance Doc. I.D. 26412 File No. 03-10263 1 -000-00-SE Mr. Brad Plemmons March 17, 2004 Page 3 standards for the multi -family lot as part of the CZA amendment process. First, I suggest you consult the City's Community Design Guidelines to review minimum architectural and site design guidelines applicable to all multi -family development (FWCC Section 22-1638 [d] [21). City staff suggests implementing the following standards for these proposed multi -family lots: townhouse style development, attached garages, building size and/or unit limitations, etc., in addition to required compliance with the City's design guidelines. 9. Portions of comment number nine have not been addressed. For your convenience, I have bolded portions below that require a written response. The following section contains comments in response to your August 27, 2003, letter regarding proposed amendments to the CZA. Provisions from the CZA and your requested revision or amendment are summarized below. Staff has provided a response to each CZA provision and requested amendment. Additional information will be necessary to further evaluate the CZA amendment proposal as discussed in each section below. Please note that the staff comments below are based on the information submitted to date, are preliminary in nature, and subject to change in response to any changes to the proposal. Item 2C: The current CZA requires a minimum 60-foot building setback along Campus Drive. The applicant did not address this CZA provision in writing, but the preliminary plat map shows a 60- foot wide landscape easement along Campus Drive. Staff Comment: The original intent of the 60-foot building setback was to protect the steep slopes adjacent to Campus Drive, and provide a landscape screen between Campus Drive and the planned project. According to the submitted materials, the slope along Campus Drive on the project site exceeds 40 percent slope and is regulated as a Geologically Hazardous Area (GHA). The proposed 60-foot landscape area protects the area of slope that exceeds 40 percent; however, FWCC Section 22-1286 also regulates development activity within 25-feet from the top and toe of the 40 percent slope. The proposed plat design identifies stormwater improvements which are proposed within the 25-foot setback of the GHA. In concept, City staff is supportive of maintaining the proposed 60-foot landscape area along Campus Drive. Any intrusion within 25-feet of the top of the slope (such as the proposed stormwater facilities) and toe, will require an analysis by a soils engineer, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1286. See item number 12 below for additional information pertaining to a soils report. Item 21): The current CZA requires widening Campus Drive along the entire length of the site. The applicant requests to change the CZA language to fit current conditions. Staff Comment: Public Works Department staff has indicated that construction of road improvements along Campus Drive SW, and at the intersection of 101h Avenue SW, would be required to be completed prior to recording the final plat per the City code requirements. Please reference letter from Ken Miller, Deputy Public Works Director dated February 6, 2004. Item 2F: This CZA provision pertains to a maximum allowed density of 347 units. The applicant requests revising the CZA to reflect multi -family area to be located on lots 45-48, and to retain the same proportionate density. Doc. I.D. 26412 File No. 03-102631-000-00-SE i Mr. Brad Plemmons March 17, 2004 Page 4 Staff Comment: The density of 347 units is inapplicable. Staff does not understand the applicant's request and comment pertaining to proportionate density. As previously requested, please provide clarification of your comment regarding this subject in your August 13, 2003, letter/CZA modification request. Item 211: The CZA requires one-third of the project to be townhouse design units. The applicant requests to delete this requirement based on current plans for multi -family use. Staff Comment: At this time, staff does not support eliminating the current CZA provisions for townhouse style development, unless multi -family design provisions are implemented as discussed in item 8, above. No response has been provided to this comment, please provide a written response. Item 3: The CZA requires set -aside and dedication of the 10t1i Avenue corridor, with CZA revisions contained in Resolution 93-144. The applicant requests to reflect current conditions and traffic mitigation and credits as proposed in Chris Brown's TIA. Staff Comment: Public Works Department staff has indicated they do not support any revisions to this CZA provision. Please reference letter from Ken Miller, Deputy Public Works Director, dated February 6, 2004. 10. Comment number ten from my November 5, 2003 memo, has been adequately addressed in concept. 11. A response to item number 11 has not been provided. Please address this comment. The response in the SEPA checklist identifies that a fee -in -lieu of providing on -site open space is proposed. The PARCS Director has preliminarily approved fee -in -lieu for the single-family portion of the proposal; however, several comments regarding open space are discussed below, and must be resolved/clarified before proceeding with the SEPA and subdivision review. First, FWCC Section 22-667, identifying development standards for multi -family use requires open space in the amount of 400 square feet per multi -family unit. In addition, FWCC Section 20-155 requires open space, or fee -in -lieu of, in the amount of 15 percent of the gross area of the site being subdivided. Please respond to this comment. If you decide to pursue multi -family development on lot 45, then at this time, you may propose for review, which of the two open space standards to implement on lot 45. Either a fee -in -lieu of on -site open space could be provided with the final plat review, or on -site open space per FWCC Section 22-667, could be implemented at the time of development of multi -family units. The proposed open space must comply with the more restrictive of the two alternatives. If the multi- family lots were revised for single-family development, then a fee -in -lieu would be permissible with the platting process. In regard to more general comments about the proposed open space, City staff is supportive of a portion of the open space requirement being met by the following: buffer open space (along Campus Drive), conservation open space (wetland buffer), and usable open space (pedestrian tracts). Please Doc. L D. 26412 File No. 03-102631-000-00-SE Mr. Brad Plemmons March 17, 2004 Page 5 review FWCC Section 20-155(a), identifying the various types of code defined open space to assist you in developing a revised open space proposal. 12. A geo-technical engineering evaluation was submitted in response to comment number 12 of my November 5, 2003, review. Additional information is required. Please have the geo-technical evaluation amended by the engineer to address the following specific items: 12a) The engineer must address the existing 40 percent slope area adjacent to Campus Drive (mainly in proposed Tract Q. Any improvements within 25 feet of the top or toe of the slope must be addressed and identified in the soils report and must meet the decisional criteria of FWCC Section 22-1286, that no other reasonable alternative exists, and then only if the development activity or land surface modification will not lead to or create any increased slide, seismic, or erosion hazard. It appears that several improvements such as drainage facilities, pedestrian facilities, utilities, and street improvements are proposed within both 25 feet of the top and toe of this slope. Respond to how the proposed improvements within 25 feet of the top and toe of the slope meet the decisional criteria outlined above. 12b) The engineer must provide a map that identifies where the ten -foot wide buffer is recommended from the crest of the cut slopes (see December 15, 2003, Berquist Report, page 5). Is this buffer from all cut slopes? 12c) The engineer must provide a map that identifies where the ten -foot wide buffer is recommended from the fill slopes (see December 15, 2003, Berquist Report, page 6). Is this buffer from all fill slopes? 12d) The engineer must identify where the ten -foot wide buffer is applicable for fill slopes. Specifically, is the buffer from the crest of slope or toe of slope, or both? 12e) The engineer must expand on the restrictions and limitations of the recommended ten - foot wide buffer. For example, what is permitted in the ten -foot buffer? Is the ten -foot buffer applicable to the following: vegetation removal, impervious surfaces, buildings, drainage facilities, utilities, etc.? 13. A March 15, 2004, review memo from Public Works Engineering Senior Engineering Plan Reviewer Kim Scattarella, is enclosed for your review and response. Please respond to Mr. Scattarella's comments and revise the preliminary plans accordingly. 14. A March 11, 2004, review memo from Public Works Traffic Division Manager Rick Perez is enclosed for your review and response. Please respond to Mr. Perez's comments and revise the Traffic Impact Analysis and plans accordingly. At this time, to further process the SEPA and preliminary plat applications, this issue must be further addressed. Please submit six sets of any revised plan sheets and four sets of any revised technical documents. Please be sure to include one resubmittal information form (enclosed) with any resubmittals. Doc. I.D. 26412 File No. 03-10263 1 -000-00-SE Mr. Brad Plemmons March 17, 2004 Page 6 Please be advised that if the additional information requested above is not submitted within 180 days of the date of this letter, the pending applications will expire. Contact me at 'im.harris svci offederalwa .com, or 253-661-4019 if you have any questions or need any assistance. Sincerely, Jim Harris Senior Planner Enc: Resubmittal Information Form Public Works Development Services Review Memo from Kim Scattarella, March 15, 2004 Public Works Traffic Division Memo from Rick Perez, March 11, 2004 c: Kim Scattarella, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Rick Perez, Traffic Division Manager Doc. I.D. 26412 File No. 03-10263 1 -000-00-SE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL . June 15 2004 F/.• DATE: TO: Kim Scattarella, Senior Development Engineer Rick Perez, Traffic Division Manager FROM: Jim Harris FOR DRC MTG. ON: NA FILE NUMBER(s): 03-102631-00-SE RELATED FILE NOS.: None PROJECT NAME: WYNSTONE PRELIMIANRY PLAT MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Revised Preliminary Plat Map Berquist Engineering Letter, dated April 15, 2004 ROW Modification Request, dated June 11, 2004 (rec'd) Jaeger Engineering Letter, dated May 27, 2004 Red -Line plat map Please review these documents and provide your review and/or SEPA comments to me. I anticipate conducting my review in approximately the first week of August, so provide your comments to me by that time. JA"GER ENC INEER-NG 9419 S. 204 PLACE - KENT, WASHINGTON 98031 PHONE (253) 850-0934 FAx (253) 850-0 X 55, R May 27, 2004 Wynstone Preliminary Plat File 03-102630-00-SU J U N 1 12004 Response to comment list by Kim Scattearella, Public Works, dated March 12, 2004. Following is a response to the items in the order that they are listed on the comment sheets: 1. ROW widths and paved widths have been added to the prelim road plan. The area of future dedication on SW Campus Drive is not encumbered by the nearby sewer easement. 2. The file number has been added to the prelim plat plan. 3. 1 have revised the section for SW Campus Drive to include the existing and proposed ROW width. 4. The preliminary plat plan has been revised with the dashed lines. (Dotted lines do not show up well on the prints) 5. The proposed lot lines have been revised to solid lines. 6. Existing easements with recording numbers have been added to the prelim plat plan. 7. The owner name and tax lot number (abbreviated) has been added to the adjacent properties within 100'. 3. The street connection between SW 340th between the school property and the plat has been dashed in on the prelim road plan. 9. This will be provided at engineering plan approval. 10. This will be provided at engineering plan approval. 11.The stormwater wetland will be used to meet water quality enhancement. A 20' scale detail of each facility is provided. The spill control structures located prior to cell 1 has been added. 12. Cross sections for the water quality facilities will be provided at engineering plan approval. My understanding of the design of stormwater wetlands is that there is no minimum volume required. The volume of the water quality design storm is used to determine a minimum surface area. The 20 scale plan details show the surface areas and are drawn to scale to confirm that they can fit within the Tracts. 13. The proposed retaining walls within Tract A drainage facility have been better defined on the plan detail by applying a solid hatch between the walls. It is much easier now to see the limits of the walls. 14. An additional letter from the geotechnical engineer is being provided with this submittal. It should be noted that none of the created slopes are greater than 2:1. The temporary erosion/sediment control measures will be included with the TESC plan at engineering plan approval. 15. Easement widths have been added to the plans. 16.1 have added a dispersal trench to the Tract B drainage facility for discharge into the existing wetland area. 17.1 located the spill control structures so that they are adjacent to the access road or just behind the sidewalk on the cul-de-sac bulb (for Tract A). 18.This detailed drainage information is generally provided at the engineering plan approval stage. If provided now, much of that detailed information may change as a result of the preliminary approval process and must be redone in the future. This information is not critical to determine if the system will function or can be constructed. 19.The road profiles have been provided, The drainage profiles will be provided at the engineering plan approval process. 20. At this time, there are no plans to construct this project in phases. 21.The minimum separations will be provided and shown on the engineering plans. 22.The ROW width and pavement widths have been added to the prelim road plan, 23.The pedestrian tracts have been widened to 20' in width. The typical section has been added to the plans. 24. The driveway cuts will be shown on the engineering plans. Hopefully, a builder will be identified that can assist in locating the driveway cuts. Otherwise, constructed cuts may be removed & relocated during the house construction phase. (It would be nice if this problem can be solved during engineering review, without having to know the house footprint at that time). 25.The wet season erosion control requirements are noted. I would not recommend that this project be undertaken during the wet season due to the extreme grading involved. In any case, this will be addressed during engineering plan review. 26.The TESC plan will be provided during the engineering plan review. Items within the TESCP should not affect the viability or configuration of the project, which is the focus of the preliminary plat review. 27.This information will be provided at engineering plan review. 28.This will be provided at engineering plan review. 29.This off -site dedication will be coordinated by the applicant, 30.1 have verified the areas. It should be noted that the lot areas will be provided with a bypass drainage conveyance system so that they are not tributary to the water quality facilities. 31.1 have completed the stormwater wetland sizing worksheets for each facility. They are attached. Please see comments on those sheet that indicate a conflict with the design criteria outlined within the SWDM. 32.The sediment pond design will be provided with the TESCP during the engineering plan review. I do not understand why the sediment pond design is needed for the preliminary plat review. 33.The prescibed table of contents will be used for the TIR that is submitted with the engineering plan review package. Many items within that table (conditions summary, conveyance calcs, ESC analysis, bond quantities, O&M manual) do not seem applicable for the preliminary plat review. N0.075 P.14i19 P9q, 7.2000 11:55Ar1 KC wLRD ICING CC --)dTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WA It DESIGN MANUAL STORA'IWATER WETLANT SIZIlN'O WORKSHEET Summary of the 1998 Surface `'Pater Design Manual Requirements Project name: N Sl qt iF_ %,i_ I rR PL ptT — TR'Pte—T We METHODS OF ANALYSIS (see p. 6-86) Step , Determine volume factor . Use basic size f = = _3 Consult WQ requirements(Section1.2.8) Ste 2 Determine rainfall R for mean annual storm Rainfall (R) 1-7/2, = 0, 03 (feet) Required from Figure 6.4.1.A Ste 3 Calculate runoff from mean annual storm V, = (O.gA,f 0.25A,g+ 0.10Au+ 0.01 Ag) X R A= tributary area of impervious surface ZgsO (so Determine now Ajg= tributary area of till grass 4Lj_&36 (so Determine now Atf = tributary area of till forest 0 (sf) Determine now A,g= tributary area of outwash grass 0 (so Determine now R = rainfall from mean annual storm , D 3 r (ft) From Step 2 V, = volume of runoff from mean annual storm y (co Ste 4) Calculate volume of "tem late" Ret ool Vb=fV, f = Volume factor V, _. volume runoff, mean annual storm Vb = Volume of the "template" wetpool Ste Calculate re uired wetland surface area Amp = vt-'x + template Vb Atop = Ste 6) Determine wetland cell dimensions a) Determine geometry of first cell V, from step 3 = volume 1 st cell Depth h 1st cell (minus sed. stor.) 3 (unitless) From Step 1 -j S,q3 (co From Step 3 i I Z 7 zi- (co (A, P = surface area of both cells) 11 12-1 q - (co From step 4 4 28 I (sf) "Sizing" depth is�ft V 4� same as steps 7 & 8, stormwater wetland) 3753 (cry S (ft) Determine horizontal xs area at mid -depth using Amid = Vlst/h Artie 04D (so Mid -width _ 21 (ft) Mid -length = 40 (ft) Determine horizontal xs area at surface 2' Z = Side slope length: 7- (H): 1(V) Z; I (ft) 2(h/2 x Z )_t�(Z)% Z 10 (ft) Note'actual cell depth may be from 4to8ft 3:1 recommended 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 10/14/99 12 04/07/00 FRI 12:40 [TX/R_X NO 91531 NO 075 P 1s/,4 APR. 7.2000 11:55M KC WLRD —� ICING C�NTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE PIA.iR DESIGN MANUAL Find top dimensions by adjusting for shape geometrics Top width j (ft) Top length (p l 44.0 (ft) AT, = (sf) b) Determine geometry of second cell Wetland surface area Ate (sf) From step 5 Surface area of cell 2 Zcy, 4 — 14-Vi l n 3 M 1n. AN.P - AT1 Depth h of 2nd cell SteR2 Choose plants for wetland cell See recommendations in Table 6.4.1.A, p. 6-75 ZZq$ P` vi See Table 6.4.3.A and varies. 1.5 avaCriteria #8 p. 6-88 Stc fi Deai rest of vand See P. 6-87 for Criteria Internal berm Inlet & Outlet Primary overflow Access Other Design Details (Sections 6.2.2, p. 6-18, 6.2.3, p. 20 and 6.2.4, p. 6-22) Sequence of Facilities Setbacks Sideslopes, fencing, embankment Liners Total pond surface area estimate Surface area 1st cell + 2nd cell a- area for internal berm + area for access ramp ZZ�.�-+I�}35rt1�t 9-2Z = 4Zo3 q zo.3 1 sf 1010oa S:r-:- Flus setback, access roads, 100-yr conveyance � I i-,4-&T P"J, A) 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 13 10/ 14/99 04/07/00 FRI 12:40 (TX/1LC NO 91531 P IR . 7.2033 11 ' 55Prl KC a RD KING Cr -'STY. WASHINGTON, SURFACE WA- R DESIGN MANUAL STORIMVATER «'ETL 4.ND SIMG WORKSHEET Summary of the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual Requirements ect name: UJ 4 M S-A�V— E— + L o f�- METHODS OF ANALYSIS (see p. 6-86) Ste 1 Dctermine volume factor . Use basic size f = = :,i Consult WO requirements(Scction1.2.8) Ste Determine rainfall R for mean annual storm Rainfall (R) 9-1= D, 0 ai (feet) Required from Figure 6.4.1.A Stc 3) Calculate runoff from mean annual storm V,= (O.SAI+ 0.25A,;+ 0.10Av.0.01 Ate) X R IN= tributary area of impervious surface 1 "70ZC3 (s`) Determine now A Q= tributary area of till crass (so Determine now Atf = tributary area of till forest p (sf) Determine no%v A,,'= tributary area of ouINVash grass L (so Determine new R = rainfall from mean annual storm p, ❑ 3$ (F) From Step 2 V, = volume of runoff from mean annual storm Ca38 9 (cl) Stern 4) Calculate Volume of "template" R'etn001 V,=fV, f = Vclw e factor V, _. volume runoff, r-nean anr,Ual sto,7n Vb = Volume of 'the "template" wetpool Step 5) Calculate required wetland surface area Atoa = V.,3 - template Vb = ,stop = Step 6) Determine wetland cell dimensions a) Determine oeometry of first cell V, from step 3 = volume i st cell Depth h 1 st cell (minus sed. stor.) 3 (unitless) From Step 1 42 :3G Cr (CO From Step 3 f (c0 (A,cr = surface area of bo'.h cel!s) 17 (ct) From step 4 1q (so "Sizing,dep.h isft �' ( - / same as steps 7 & "o, stomv,a:er wetland) Note actual cell dep'Lh _(ft) may be from 4 to S ft Determine horizontal xs area at mid -depth using Amid = V 1 st/h Am:d 3 zA- (Si Mid -width b (ft) Mid -length I$ {ft) Determine horizontal xs area 2t surface Z = Side slope length: Z(H): 1(V) Z + (ft) 2(h/2 x Z)=�� � 3:1 recommended 1995 Swf<.ce Water Design Manual 10/14/99 12 04/07/00 FRI 12:40 lTT/RX NO 91531 qpR. 7.233 11.55r'r"t KC t•!RD NO. ©75 P.15/19 KING C( )ITY_ WASHINGTON. SURFACE WA Z DESIGN MANUAL Find top dimensions Cy adjusting for shape geometries Top width 2A, (�3 Top length zCP 00 (` t" 1 "ms= AT, _[s (�38 • _ (lam b) Determine geometry of second cell Wetland surface area A,� _ 4�(sf) From step 5 Surface area of cell 2 4—j q - luo l MN R . , - A, 1 Qrovt See Table 6.4.3.A and Depth h of 2nd cell variuns. 1.5, ava Criteria #8 p. 6-88 Step 71 Choose rilants for R•etland cell See recommendations in Table 6.4.1.A, p. 6-75 Ste S Deciom rest of and (See p. 6-57 for Criteria Internal berm Inlet & Outlet Primary overflow Access Other Design Details (Sections 6.2.2, p. 6-18, 6.2.3. p. 20 and 6.2.4. p. 6-22) Sequence of Facilities Setbacks Sideslope-s, f:ncino, embankment Liners Total pond surface area estimate Surface area 1st cell + 2nd cell + area for i. itemel berf 1 + area for access ramp (-,lcPf 3G-4F Szf -132- = i 43z4 [f ¢ F1::s se"backs, access roZL, 100-yr eonN-eyaoce 1998 SLTfacc Warcr Design Manual 10115Y99 13 ni/07/00 FPT i?•sn fTT/RT Kn 91531 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: TO: FROM: FOR DRC MTG . ON FILE NUMBER (S) PROJECT NAME: May 4, 2004 Rick Perez Kim Scattarella Jim Harris na 03-102631-00-SE WYNSTONE FILr MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Revised TIA dated March 31, 2004 Rick: The revised TIA for Wynstone is attached. Please review and provide me your written comments. Comments can be in the form of technical review comments to be addressed, or SEPA conditions, or pre -plat conditions. Thanks JimH CITY OF � Federal April 27, 2004 Mr. Brad Plemmons 101 T Street Southeast Auburn, WA 98002 CITY HALL Way 33530 1st Way South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253)661-4000 www.cityoffederalway.com Re: File #03-102631-000-00-SE; TRAFFIC DIVISION REVIEW Wynstone Preliminary Plat, SEPA and CZA Amendment Dear Mr. Plemmons: Please find enclosed an April 26, 2004, Traffic Division review memo from Rick Perez. At this time, to further process the Wynstone applications, the comments in the attached memorandum and the comments in my March 17, 2004, technical review letter must be addressed. Please submit six sets of any revised plan sheets and four sets of any revised technical documents. Be sure to include one resubmittal information form (enclosed) with any resubmittals. Please be advised that if the additional information requested above is not submitted within 180 days of the date of this letter, the pending applications will expire. Contact me at-iim.harris@citEoffederalway.com or 253-661-4019, if you have any questions or need any assistance. Sincerely, Harris Senior Planner enc: Resubmittal Information Form Public Works Traffic Division Memo from Rick Perez, April 26, 2004 c: Kim Scattarella, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Rick Perez, Traffic Division Manager 03-102631-SE Doc I D. 27031 CITY for. ay Federal W DATE: 26 April 2004 TO: Jim Harris, Senior Planner FROM: Rick Perez, P.E., City Traffic Engiener SUBJECT: WYNSTONE - (03-102631-00-SE) *NO SITE ADDRESS* MEMORANDUM Public Works Department I have reviewed the submittal dated March 31, 2004 from Christopher Brown and Associates, revising the TIA for the project. Most corrections have been made, although I find it shocking that Mr. grown claims that his software cannot discriminate between protected and protected/permitted phasing, and so would the creator of the software. However, in all cases, this results in a more conservative analysis, and does not affect the any required mitigation measures. However, the revised analysis fails to account for the additional traffic that will use 12th Avenue SW once it connects to SW Campus Drive, despite having been supplied by the City with this information. This analysis must be done in order to assure that the intersection of SW Campus Drive and loth Avenue SWJ12th Avenue SW will function adequately. The applicant needs to submit a revised analysis to address this issue. L:\CSDC\DOCS\SAVE\13010324046.DOC FIDE CITY OF Federal Way DATE: August 11, 2004 MEMORANDUM Community Development Services Department TO: Brad Plemmons, via email: bplemmo@aol.com Jim Jaeger, via email: �jags@aol.com FROM: 1 l Harris, Senior Planner, 253-661-4019 orjim.harris@cityoffederalway.com. 9 SUBJECT: Wynstone Preliminary Plat and SEPA (03-102631-00-SE) Planning Division Technical Comments Please address the following comments. The SEPA threshold determination has been drafted; however, the following items must be addressed prior to issuance of the determination. Provide four sets of any revised plans or technical information. 1. As we have discussed, if you want the SEPA review and determination to include the construction of the 18 - 19 units of multi -family housing on proposed lot 45, then two minor changes must be made to the SEPA checklist. Specifically, item A6 on page two of the SEPA checklist and item Ai I on page three of the checklist must both be revised to include and identify that construction of the 18 - 19 multi -family units are part of the proposed action. Please note that a SEPA threshold determination does not have a prescribed expiration date or shelf life. However, if construction of the multi -family units does not occur within a reasonable timeframe following the SEPA threshold determination, then the multi -family construction will be required to be evaluated for SEPA compliance, and may require additional SEPA review at that future time. Pursuant to WAC 197-11-600, in general, a new threshold determination is required if there is new information indicating a proposal's probable significant adverse environmental impact, or if there are substantial changes to a proposal so that the proposal is likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts. 2. The buffers from toe and crest of slopes for residential structures required by the geotechnical engineer in his April 15, 2004 letter, results in several lots which may not have an adequate building envelope. Specifically, the building envelopes on lots 1, 2, 7, and 8 appear to be severely constrained due to the required buffers, in addition to Federal Way City Cade required building setbacks from property lines. In addition, no structures may be constructed within the easement abutting the east property line. Please revise the plans to depict an adequate building envelope on each proposed lot. 3. The geotechnical reports and recommended buffers from toe and crest of slopes leads to some confusion regarding the suitability of lots 1 —18 for residential construction. Therefore, the geotechnical engineer must address the general nature and suitability of future construction of residential structures on proposed lots 1-18 as these lots are wholly or largely on a substantial Doc. I.D. 28522 03-102631 fill. In addition, the geotechnical engineer must address the suitability of future residential construction on proposed lots 19 and 20 where significant cuts/fills are proposed on these lots. 4. Based on my phone conversation with Jim Jaeger on August 10, 2004, I understand that you are considering implementing rockeries and/or retaining walls within some of the large fill areas in and around lots 7 - 10. If rockeries and/or retaining walls are proposed in lieu of currently proposed grading contours, the locations and heights of all rockeries/walls must be depicted on the plans. The geotechnical engineer must address any required setbacks from rockery/retaining walls. City staff attempts to minimize the extent of visually obtrusive walls. If extensive walls are proposed, screening of the walls and visual treatment will likely be required. 5. The geotechnical engineer must provide some generalized written conclusions regarding the general nature of the site and suitability of the site for development of public roadways, utilities, and residential construction. 6. The geotechnical engineer must base his recommendations on the most current design and preliminary grading plan. Specifically, the April 15, 2004, geo-tech addendum did not evaluate the most current grading plan, as the geo-tech addendum is dated April 15, 2004, while the revised grading plan is dated May 20, 2004. The May 20, 2004, Jaeger Engineering grading plan is substantially different from the grading plan included in the April 15, 2004, geotechnical report. 7. A July 30, 2004, memo from Kim Scattarella is enclosed for your review and response. None of the comments included in the memo require recisions or response for the SEPA review. However, there are three items that Public Works has regdested to be addressed before preliminary plat review and decision. c: Kim Scattarella 03-102631 Doc. I.D. 28522 Feiieral Way DATE: 11 August 2004 TO: Jim Harris FROM: Rick Perez SUBJECT: WYNSTONE - (03-102631-00-SE) *NO SITE ADDRESS* MEMORANDUM Public Works Department This memorandum provides comments from the Traffic Division regarding the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) conditions pertaining to the proposed Wynstone Subdivision. Federal Way Comprehensive Plan references are provided in annotated form supporting the recommended conditions for the development. Policies and goals adopted by the City of Federal Way serve as the basis for the exercise of substantive SEPA authority to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions, which are applicable to potential adverse environmental impacts resulting from this project. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Mitigation Based on the Traffic Irnpact Analysis (TIA), prepared by Christopher Brown & Associates, dated March 31, 2004, the single-family portion of the development would generate 51 new weekday evening peak hour trips, and the multi -family portion of the development would generate 12 new weekday evening peak hour trips. The new trips generated by the development would have significant impact on the City's transportation network. The City of Federal Way has identified five (5) TIP projects impacted by 10 or more trips. SEPA Conditions - In order to mitigate for the adverse transportation impacts of the new trips generated by the development on existing transportation network, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall: Construct impacted TIP projects at the following locations: a. S 348a' Street from 9 h Avenue S to SR 99: Add HOV lanes, install raised median, underground utilities, add northbound left -turn at SR 99. This project is impacted by 17 trips from the single-family component, and 5 trips from the multi -family component of the development. b. S 356`h Street from I't Avenue S to SR 99: Widen to 5 lanes with bike lanes. This project is impacted by 12 trips from the single-family component, and 2 trips from the multi -family component of the development. C. S 348d' Street at 1s` Avenue S: Add 2nd left -turn lanes eastbound, westbound, southbound, and westbound and southbound right -turn lanes. This project is impacted by 25 trips from the single-family component, and 6 trips from the multi -family component of the development. d. 12'h Avenue SW / SW 344h Street from SW Campus Drive to 215` Avenue SW: Extend 3-lane street. Three different segments of this project are impacted as follows: i. 12'h Avenue SW between SW Campus Drive and SW 340`h Street is impacted by 45 trips from the single-family component, and 10 trips from the multi -family component of the development. The development would construct this segment of the project, therefore no mitigation is required. ii. 12`h Avenue SW between SW 340`h Street and SW 344d' Street is impacted by 18 trips from the single-family component, and 4 trips from the multi -family component. This development would construct a portion of this segment, and the remainder has been constructed by another development. Therefore, no mitigation is required for this segment. iii. SW 3-. 1 Street from 12th Avenue SW to 21' Avenue K would be impacted by 6 trips from the family -family component and 2 trips from the multi -family component. Since this segment is impacted by less than 10 trips, no mitigation is required for this segment of the project. e. SR 18 at SR 161: Add 3rd westbound left -turn lane, eastbound and westbound right -turn lanes, add third southbound lane on SR 161 to S 352nd Street. This project is impacted by 11 trips from the single-family component, and 3 trips from the multi -family component of the development. Channelization and street improvement plans shall be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the State of Washington and submitted for City of Federal Way's review and approval in concurrence with building permit application, and constructed prior to occupancy of any units on site. In lieu of constructing the TIP improvements projects, prior to the issuance of construction permits, the applicant may voluntarily pay the project's pro-rata share contribution. The pro-rata share contribution for each project is calculated based on the formula below: Project generated PM peak trips Fair share contribution =------------------------- —---- ------- x (TIP project cost — value of right-of-way and frontage improvements) Projected Total PM peak traffic These are calculated per the table below: F IP Project Background Percent Fair -Share ject Project Name Project Cost Trips Volume impact Contribution D 6 S 348`h St: $4,350,000 17 SF 3553 0.3% SF $20,813 SF 9th Ave S — SR 99 5 MF 0.1% MF $6,122 MF 11 S 356 St: $8,905,000 12 SF 1750 0.7% SF $61,063 SF lst Ave S — SR 99 2 MF 0.1% MF $10,177 MF 13 S 348th St @ $1,800,000 25 SF 4459 0.6% SF $10,092 SF 15t Ave S 6 MF 0.1% MF $2,422 MF 20 SR 18 @ SR 161 $3,350,000 11 SF 5459 0.2% SF $6,720 SF 3 MF 0.1%MF $1,833 MF TOTALS $98,688 SF $20,554 MF Cost per Unit $2,243 SF $1,082 MF As required by state law, the City shall refund collected fees if not used for the identified TIP projects within five (5) years. 2. The completion of SW 340th Street between 12th Avneue SW and 19`' Avenue SW would create a new route between neighborhoods to the south and Saghalie Junior High School, and shopping areas to the west of the development. This could adversely impact the safety of access to the school. Therefore, two speed humps shall be placed on SW 340th Street between 13th Court SW and 19`h Avneue SW to mitigate safety impacts associated with the increase in speed and volume of traffic on SW 340th Street. The following are components of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan supporting the recommended conditions for the development. TG1 Maintain mobility for residents and businesses through a balanced, integrated system of transportation alternatives that: a. Meet local anc., egional needs though inter jurisdictionally dordinated and integrated systems. b. Reduces auto dependency, especially SOV use. C. Supports the land use vision and plan. d. Protects and enhances the environment and quality of life. e. Provides acceptable levels of service for each transportation mode that is also commensurate with the planned levels offunding. TP5 Protect neighborhoods from traffic impacts. TG2 Provide a safe, efficient, convenient, and financially sustainable transportation system with sufficient capacity to move people, goods, and services at an acceptable level of service. The City shall develop and adopt policies for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and preservation ofnew and existingfacilities. TP 10 Protect existing and acquire future right-of-way consistent with functional classification cross- section (transit, rail, bike, and pedestrian) needs. Require developments to dedicate right-of-way as needed for development commensurate with the impacts of the development. At a minimum, setback limits shall be used to assure that buildings are not placed within the right-of-way requirements for planned transportation facilities. Right-of-way dedication shall be commensurate with the developments' impact to the existing and planned transportation system. TP 14 Provide access between major development areas identified in the recommended alternative, while improving business access and protecting City neighborhoods. TP 16 The City's LOS standard shall be E. This is defined herein as a volume/capacity ratio less than 1.00 in accordance with Highway Capacity Manual (2000) operational analysis procedures. At signalized intersections, the analysis shall be conducted using a 120-second cycle length and level of service E is defined as less than 80 seconds of delay per vehicle. Where transit or HOV facilities are provided, the LOS shall be measured by average delay and volume/capacity ratio per person rather than per vehicle. This standard shall be used to identify concurrency needs and mitigation of development impacts. For long-range transportation planning, a volume/capacity ratio of 0.90 or greater will be used to identify locations for the more detailed operational analysis. TP-17 Expand arterial capacity by constructing channelization improvements at intersections when they are an alternative to creating new lanes along a roadway corridor. TP 19 Limit single -occupant vehicle capacity increases to those required to maintain the existing LOS, either by providing new streets or by widening existing streets. Maintain existing and preserve future street connections vital to system integrity. TP20 Take advantage of opportunities to open new road connections to create route alternatives, especially in areas with few access choices. TP21 Enhance traffic circulation and access with closer spacing of through streets, unless geographic constraints do not permit. Limit the area to be served by a single access point commensurate with planned density. TP23 Minimize though traffic on residential streets by maximizing through travel opportunities on arterial and collector streets. TP26 Employ traffic calming measures in neighborhoods (where feasible) where traffic volumes and speeds on local streets consistently exceed reasonable levels. TP37 Keep through traffic to state routes and arterials. Discourage the use of local or neighborhood streets ' for through movemem, kunless part of an overall process of creating .street grid). TP62 Modify the development review process by: o Incorporating revised impact analysis procedures that comply with GMA concurrency and other requirements. The revisions need to include revised Level of Service standards. o Streamlining it to the extent possible to minimize private development costs. Where developments are consistent with this plan, they should be allowed to proceed by mitigating site impacts; developing appropriate components of the HOV, transit, non -motorized and motorized chapters; and participating in an equitable citywide improvement funding or mitigation payment program. o Incorporating requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. o Requiring explicit consideration of pedestrian and bicycle circulation, as well as parking and general circulation needs. Brad Plemmons Enterprises Inc. 101 T.S. S.E. AUBURN, WA. 98002 Office: 206-293-1434 Fax: (253)-939-6170 Mr. Jim Harris, Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way S. Federal Way, WA 98003 ����AlyD JUL 2 8 2004 t02 ! Re: File No. 03-1�-000-00-SE, PLANNING DIVISION SECOND TECHNICAL REVIEW Wynstone Preliminary Plat and CZA Amendment City staff supports the revised clearing and grading limits in concept; however, no written request and justification for clearing and grading for areas outside streets and utility areas was provided. As previously requested, provide a written request and justification for clearing and grading beyond the infrastructure areas identified on the revised preliminary clearing and grading plans. A. Please note the attached written request and justification for clearing and grading for areas outside streets and utility areas. As previously requested, in order to facilitate City staff review of proposed grading plans, provide cross-section drawings of the proposed grading in the locations identified on the previously redline drawing. A. Submitted 6111104 7. The first two bullet items of this comment have not been addressed. Provide a written response to each bullet item. Page four of the Habitat Technologies Wetland Report identifies a small isolated wetland less than 500 square feet exists on the site; however, the preliminary plat indicates an on -site wetland and identifies it as 1,029 square feet. Please reply to the following questions regarding the wetlands: Please clarify the size discrepancy of the preliminary plat map and wetland assessment report. A. Wetlands sire discrepancy was due to a miss calculation of area by the biologist as the area of square footage was surveyed and computer calculated by DRYCO SURVEYEING INC. ■ Was the on -site wetland actually surveyed, in order to determine the size? Note that the boundary survey does identify the wetland. A. Yes, by DRYCO SURVEYING INC. the siWe of on -site wetland was located and calculated in the field by flagging placed by Habitat Technologies. The plat map is an accurate representation in regards to location and size. 8. This comment was not addressed in the January 2, 2004 submittal. However, the revised preliminary plat map has consolidated four proposed multi -family lots into one single parcel which could potentially yield a total of 18 multi -family units. Under the existing CZA for Parcel 5(b), a 60-goot wide landscape buffer and solid board fence is required where the multi -family zoning of Parcel 5(b) adjoins single family zoning. The CZA also has a provision for one-third of the project to be townhouse design units. Provide a response to the comments herein regarding design and performance standards on the proposed multifamily parcel. Based on the following factors, future multi -family development on lot 45 may not be appropriate unless performance and design standards are proposed and/or implemented: 1) consideration of the current design and buffering provisions in the CZA; 2) potential incompatibility between proposed multi -family and single-family developments; and 3) the geographic location of the proposed multi -family lot. As discussed at our meeting on August 13, 2003, in order to gain City staff support for the request CZA amendment, you will need to propose implementing design and performance standards for the multi -family lot as part or the CZA amendment process. First, i suggest you consult the City's Community Design Guidelines to review minimum architectural and site design guidelines applicable to all multi -family development (FWCC Section 22-1638[d] [21). City staff suggests implementing the following standards for these proposed multi -family lots: townhouse style development, attached garages, building size and/or unit limitations, etc., in addition to required compliance with City's design guidelines. A. Lot 45, a multi family site will conform to (FWCC Section 22-1638[d][21). B. Lot 45 shall consist ofgroups of buildings with townhouse style development design. C. Building groups shall consist of a combination of the following: 9 duplexes, 6 triplexes, or a combination there of not to exceed a total of 18 units. D. Unit footprints shall be 12004600 square feet including attached garages, and comply with City design guidelines. E. Applicant requests a CZA amendment to reduce the landscape buffer from 60 to 20 feet with the same design standards and fencing in regards to abutting zones. 9. Item 2F: This CZA provision pertains to a maximum allowed density of 347 units. The applicant's request revising the CZA to reflect multi -family area to be located on lots 4548, and to retain the same proportionate density. Stglf Comment: The density of 347 units is inapplicable. Staff does not understand the applicant's request and comment pertaining to proportions density. As previously requested, please provide clarification of your comment regarding this subject in your August 13, 2003, letter/CZA modifications request. A. Please disregard comment made on August 13, 2003 as applicant and City Staff both agree the maximum density of lot 45 shall not exceed 18 multi family units. Item 3: The CZA requires set -aside and dedication of the 10"' Avenue corridor, with CZA revisions contained in Resolution 93-144. The applicant requests to reflect current conditions and traffic mitigation and credits as proposed in Chris Brown's TIA. Staff Comment.: Public Works Department staff has indicated they do not support any revisions to this CZA prevision. Please reference letter from Ken Miller, Deputy Public Works Director, dated February 6, 2004. A. Applicant requests the formation of a" latecomers" agreement as discussed with Cary Roe, Public Works Director and Ken Miller, Deputy Public Works Director. Said conversation included releasing monies previously collected for completion of the 10`h 12`" corridor. 11. A response to item number 11 has not been provided. Please address this comment. The response in the SEPA checklist identifies that a fee -in -lieu of providing on -site open space is proposed. The PARCS Director has preliminarily approved fee -in -lieu for the single-family portion of the proposal; however, several comments regarding open space are discussed below, and must be resolved/clarified before proceeding with the SEPA and subdivision review. First, FWCC Section 22-667, identifying development standards for multi -family use requires open space in the amount of 400 square feet per multi -family unit. In addition, FWCC Section 20-155 requires open space, or fee -in -lieu of, in the amount of 15 percent of the gross area of the site being subdivided. Please respond to this comment. If you decide to pursue multi -family development on lot 45, then at this time, you may propose for review, which of the two open space standards to implement on lot 45. Either a fee -in - lieu of on -site open space could be provided with the final plat review, or on -site open space per FWCC Section 22-667, could be implemented at the time of development of multi -family units. The proposed open space must comply with the more restrictive of the two alternatives. If the multi -family lots were revised for single-family development, then a fee -in -lieu would be permissible with the platting process. In regard to more general comments about the proposed open space, City staff is supportive of a portion of the open space requirement being met by the following: buffer open space (along Campus Drive), conservation open space (wetland buffer), and usable open space (pedestrian tracts). Please review FWCC Section 20-155(a), identifying the various types of code defined open space to assist you in developing a revised open space proposal. A. Applicant proposes to pay a fee -in -lieu offor the entire site including lot 45. B. Applicant proposes to use buffer and conservation open spaces along with pedestrian tracts to reduce the potential amount of the fee -in -lieu of to be paid to the parks. Actual amount shall be calculated upon the acceptance of buffer sizes and substantiating current value. C. Applicant realizes that 15% of lot 45 is more restrictive than 400 square feet per dwelling unit at a density of 18. CITY OF L Federal Way February 6, 2004 Brad Plemmons 101 T St SE Auburn, WA 98002 CITY HALL 33530 1 st Way South - PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253)661-4000 - www. cityoffederalway com RE: Permit #03-102630-000-00-SU; Plat of Wynstone loth/12th Avenue SW *No Site Address* Dear Mr. Plemmons: This letter is to confirm the requirements for the construction of loth/12th Avenue SW from the Orchid Lane Subdivision "stub -out" to SW Campus Drive as part of the proposed Wynstone plat. The construction of 10tr/12th Avenue SW, a plat frontage road, was previously addressed in the pre - application memorandum from Sarady Long Traffic Division dated February 27, 2003. As stated in Mr: Long's memo, "The planned roadway section for 10th/12th Avenue SW is a Type M street, consisting of a 36-foot street with curb, gutter, 6-foot planting strip with street trees, 8-foot sidewalk and streetlights within a 70-foot right-of-way." The description of the proposed road construction was also addressed in the Wynstone SEPA checklist, revised Dec. 16, 2003 in Item 14 a., which states; "The proposed prgject`s primary access will be from the construction of a new principal collector street, loth/12th Avenue SW accessing SW Campus Drive." The preliminary plat plans for Wynstone show construction of this street. These plans are currently in review and comments will be provided shortly. The City of Federal Way Parks Department owns a portion of the property where the new loth/ 12th Avenue extension is proposed, near SW Campus Drive. The use of this property for the road is addressed in the 1990 Concomitant Zoning Agreement (CZA), including amendments adopted by Resolutions 93-128 and 93-144. As previously discussed, City staff supports deeding a portion of this property for right-of-way to accommodate construction of loth /12th Avenue SW. The preliminary plat and Concomitant Zoning Agreement (CZA) Amendment Technical Review letter from ]im Harris, dated November 5, 2003, provided comments on your requested amendments to the concomitant agreement. Also, included as a part of this proposed development is the widening of SW Campus Drive and this would include modification of the existing traffic signal at loth Avenue SW, which is a requirement of the CZA. The City has consistently applied City Code requiring plat street frontage/interior roads to be constructed to City standards. In this case, 1oth/12th Avenue SW is designated in the Comprehensive Plan as a principal collector Type M and required to be constructed 36 feet wide, and include a 6-foot planting strip with street trees, 8-foot sidewalk and street lighting. The costs for these improvements are to be borne by the developer; the City has no obligation to contribute. It is also our opinion that the Concomitant Agreement requires construction of these road improvements. If a "latecomers" agreement is appropriate as allowed by FWCC, staff will be supportive. Any "latecomers" agreement is subject to review and approval by the Federal Way City Council. If you have any questions, please call me at 253-661-4136. Sincerely, Ken Miller, P.E. Deputy Public Works Director KM:kk cc: Jim Harris, Senior Planner Karen Jorgensen, Assistant City Attorney Jim Femling, Development Review Manager Project File/KS Day File Doc. ID 25967 ►l� "CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 6, 2004 TO: Kim Scattarella FROM: Jim Harris FILE NUMBER(s) : 03-102631-00-SE PROJECT NAME: WYNSTONE PLAT Attached for your review are the following: Revised preliminary plat map Revised topo map Revised street and storm plans Revised SEPA checklist Revised TIR Berquist geotechnical report Please review and provide technical review comments and/or SEPA and pre plat conditions. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 2, 2004 TO: Rick Perez Kim Scattarella (w VA ' �� s ) FROM: Jim Harris FOR DRC MTG. ON: NA FILE NUMBER(s) : 03-102631-00-SE 03-102630-00-SU PROJECT NAME: WYNSTONE PRELIMINARY PLAT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental review for new proposed subdivision to divide 2 existing lots into 44 single family lots & one multi -family lot. Project includes rezone of part of one lot. LAND USE PERMITS: PROJECT CONTACT: MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Preliminary Plat, SEPA, CZA Amendment BRAD PLEMMONS 101 T ST SE (253)939-1961 Rick: attached are the following documents for the Wynstone plat: • Revised Wynstone TIA dated January 8, 2004. • Cover letter from Chris Brown dated January 30, 2004. • Revised preplat map and accompanying drawings dated received January 2, 2004. • Revised SEPA checklist date received January 2, 2004. CONFORMED COPY 20050603001039 Return Address: CAROLYN M BACK AG 88.00 II RAGE001 OF 018 ►7 U �'� �P�' a 06/03/2005 13:48 J KING COUNTY, WA G , 0 1 II� phase nrinl nr fvnC infnrmatinn WASHINGTON STATE RECORDER'S Cover Sheet (RCw65.04) Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein): (all areas applicable to your document must be filled in) If ii I f1� 1 /l 1 1. �vr[onr.tGnr �} fFFM2.n Y 7�f _l I�r-�57U�f f (0rV1Je 3. - � 4. Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference Ws on page of document Grantors (Last name, first name, initials) 1. 2. 1 Additional names on page of document. Gr ntee s) Last name first, then first name and initials) 2. i0 Additional names on page of document. Legal description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, township, range) Additional legal is on page Jbf document. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number ❑ Assessor Tax # not yet assigned CA'GNL/ 1 C)2la4__`io3v The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on the form. The staff will not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein. I am requesting an emergency nonstandard recording for an additional fee as provided in RCW 36.18.010. I understand that the recording processing requirements may cover up or otherwise obscure some part of the text of the original document' _.Signature of Requesting Party - F 651� CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND DONALD L. GARDNER INC. FOR DEVELOPMENT OF WYNSTONE PROPERTY (PARCEL 5B) MAYL2, 2005 The City of Federal Way ("City") and Donald L. Gardner Inc., ("Owner"), a Washington corporation, collectively referred to herein as "the Parties", enter into the following concomitant agreement ("Agreement") replacing an earlier concomitant agreement, changing the allowed use under that earlier agreement, and defining the necessary right-of-way improvements associated with the development of a parcel of property, specifically described below in Section 2 ("Parcel 5B"). WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way, Washington, a non -charter optional municipal code city incorporated under the laws of Washington, has authority to enact laws and enter into agreements to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its citizens and thereby control the use and development of property within its jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, a concomitant agreement was entered into between the City and Polygon in February 1990 regarding the zoning of Campus Crest Property Parcel 5, which included the Property subject to this Agreement; and WHEREAS, an amendment to the 1990 concomitant agreement via Resolution 93-128 split the Campus Crest Property Parcel 5 into two parcels referred to as Parcel 5A and 5B and removed parcel 5A from the terms of the 1990 concomitant agreement; and WHEREAS, an additional amendment to the 1990 concomitant agreement via Resolution 93-144 altered the original conditions applicable to Parcel 5B; and WHEREAS, various terms of the 1990 concomitant agreement as amended are no longer applicable to the proposed use and development of Parcel 5B; and WHEREAS, the developer working with Polygon desires to develop Parcel 5B in a manner different than what is allowed in the 1990 concomitant agreement as amended and has initiated a discussion with the City with respect to amending the 1990 concomitant agreement; and WHEREAS, both Parties agree that a new Agreement is appropriate; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to preserve its rights under the 1990 concomitant agreement as amended, including development being restricted to residential use, predetermined setbacks, maximum density requirements, and right-of-way improvements; and WHEREAS, both Parties seek clarification regarding the construction of the 10t' Avenue SW extension and SW Campus Drive improvements; and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and obligations set forth herein, it is hereby covenanted and agreed by and between the Parties hereto as follows: 1. Description of Agreement. This Agreement is a concomitant agreement that allows for a change in the allowed use of certain property subject to a previous concomitant agreement, as well as, development standards and conditions governing the use of the property. The Agreement provides the developer with certainty regarding the local regulations and mitigation requirements that will govern development for a specified project. The concomitant agreement is a condition to and limitation upon the change of use of the property, if adopted by the City Council. That is, if the allowed use is changed subject to concomitant agreement, its use and development is restricted both by the regulations applicable to the underlying zoning classification and the provisions of the concomitant agreement, and where development standards in the agreement are more restrictive, they govern property development. The development of the property is conditioned and limited by the concomitant agreement. This Agreement supercedes the 1990 concomitant agreement as amended by Resolutions 93-128 and 93-144 as it applied to Parcel 5B. 2. Location. Donald L. Gardner Inc. is the owner of certain real property, King County tax parcel. number 192104-9044, situated in Federal Way, Washington, located along the southwest side of Campus Drive at the intersection of loth Avenue SW ("Parcel 513"). Parcel 5B is more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 3. Project Description. The Project consists of development of 44 single family lots and one acre of multi -family units as depicted on the Development Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit B (the "Plan" or "Development Plan"). The Plan encompasses a larger area of real property than is covered by this Agreement. It is the intention of the Parties that the terms of this Agreement do not apply to the entire area of real property encompassed by the Plan, but only to Parcel 5B as described above in Section 2. 4. Concomitant Agreement. If the allowed use of Parcel 5B is changed from exclusive multi- family to both single-family and multi -family by the Federal Way City Council, Owner and the City agree that Parcel 5B may be developed only in accordance with the standards and mitigation set forth in the Agreement. Parcel 5B shall be developed as described in the Agreement, and as depicted in the Development Plan. The allowable use of the property shall be limited to that described in the Agreement. All development standards, including mitigation, identified in the Agreement shall apply to property development. No development on Parcel 5B shall be inconsistent with the Agreement or City Code. Parcel 5B is subject to the Agreement, and shall be developed only in accordance with the development standards identified within the Agreement, including the Development Plan, unless and until the Agreement is amended or rescinded, as authorized by the City. 5. Development of Property. 5.1 Permitted Uses. Owner covenants and agrees that it will limit any use of Parcel 5B to single- family and multi -family residences, as depicted in the Development Plan, attached as Exhibit B. 5.2 RelationshiR Between City Develo ment Re lations and Development Standards Identified in Agreement. Development Regulations include all provisions of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC), including without limitation FWCC Chapters 18 through 22. The Agreement establishes site -specific development standards, including mitigation. Property development shall be consistent with both development regulations and the development standards identified in the Agreement. Where the development standards in the Agreement are more restrictive, they shall govern development of Parcel 513, as specified herein. 2 6. Development Standards, Including Mitigation. The Project shall be consistent with all specified development standards. Owner shall construct, install or implement, as part of Project construction, all mitigation required by the Agreement. 6.1 Project Design and Site Configuration. 6.1.1 Permitted Development. Owner agrees that development shall be ofresidences only. Both single-family and multi -family development will be permitted, but no other development will be allowed without an amendment to this Agreement. 6.1.2 Building Setback. All site improvements, except utilities, right-of-way improvements, and entry signage, shall be setback from SW Campus Drive a minimum of 60 feet as depicted in the Development Plan, attached as Exhibit B. 6.1.3 Maximum Densi . The maximum density for the one acre multi -family portion of Parcel 5B, as designated in the Development Plan, shall be 16-units. 6.2 Right-of-wayRighLpf-way Improvements. Owner shall perform, as part of Project construction and prior to issuance of final plat approval unless otherwise noted, the following right-of-way improvements described in the attached Exhibit C as required and approved by the Director of Public Works. 6.2.1 €0`h Avenue SW. That portion of 10th Avenue SW located within Parcel 5B: a. Dedicate the full 70 feet Right -of -Way to the City. Right -of -Way dedication to be via Statutory Warranty Deed. Additional right-of-way, dedicated by the City Parks Department and additional slope easement, will be necessary to complete the full - width dedication to SW Campus Drive. b. Clear and grade the entire 70 feet right-of-way limits, required for the full street improvements, including clearing and grading outside the right-of-way, sufficient to provide a 2:1 slope, and as identified and allowed by the geo-technical report, from the westerly right-of-way to top of slope. c. Stabilize and control erosion of the graded area, outside the westerly edge of the hard- . surface street improvements. d. Grant a slope easement to the City, where needed, for the graded area that falls outside the westerly right-of-way limit. e. Provide street improvements for the east half of the right-of-way, as measured from the centerline: 18-foot paved roadway (centerline to face of curb), curb and gutter, six- foot planter strip with street trees and street lights, eight -foot sidewalk, and three-foot utility strip. f. Provide street improvements for the west half of the right-of-way, as measured from the centerline: six -feet of paved roadway, plus thickened -edge, and provisions for drainage. The crown of the roadway pavement shall be located at the right-of-way centerline, in anticipation of the future 36-foot pavement section. g. Construct asphalt roadway taper, at a 25:1 ratio, where the roadway section transitions from the 36-foot roadway section within Tax Lot 30, to the 24-foot roadway section within Tax Lot 44 (Parcel 5B). 7. 6.2.2 SW CaMpus_Drive. SW Campus Drive, southeast of l Oth Avenue SW, along Parcel 5B frontage: a. Dedicate seven feet of Right -of -Way to the City. Right -of -Way dedication to be via Statutory Warranty Deed. b. Provide additional asphalt paving to create a twelve -foot wide left -turn pocket to access 10'h Avenue SW from SW Campus Drive per City Standard Roadway Section `B', with concrete curb and gutter, six-foot planter strip with street trees and street lights, eight -foot sidewalk, and three-foot utility strip. c. Provide sufficient new roadway taper east from the widened paved edge at the easterly property boundary. 6.2.3 Intersection of 10'' Avenue SW and SW Cam us Drive: a. Extend existing curb, gutter, planter strip, and sidewalk around the radius to the southwest, terminating at the end of the curb return at the NW quadrant of intersection. This section of the new 1 Oth Avenue SW roadway, including pavement width, shall be constructed to the City's Type `M' street section. b. Construct asphalt paved taper, at a 25:1 ratio within the new IVh Avenue SW right-of- way, from the end of the curb return, to meet the proposed 24-foot paved roadway section, described above. c. Construct City -standard handicap access ramps at the NW and SW quadrants of the intersection. d. Add. channelization in SW Campus Drive to create a left turn lane onto 10"' Avenue SW, into the proposed plat of Parcel 5B. e. Revise the left turn marking for traffic on the existing leg of 1Oth Avenue SW so that it will be a combined thru and left turn pavement marking (WSDOT Type M marking). f. Provide channelization for the new section of 1 Oth Avenue SW marked for two lanes of traffic: one lane westbound, with the southerly lane allowing for thru-, left, and right -turns. g. Provide signal modifications, including, but not limited to, wiring and conduit, loops, new signal poles, mast arms, etc., to the existing traffic signal system to be coordinated with City Traffic Division for all required modifications. Other Project Review Processes. 7.1 Sinjzle-Family Portion. The single-family portion of the Project will be subject to preliminary plat approval, engineering plan review, final plat approval, and any other applicable review processes. The final design of the buildings and other improvements, precise location of building footprints, location of utilities, determination of access points, and other design issues will be determined during that process and must be consistent with the Agreement and the Plan. 7.2 Multi -Family Portion. The multi -family portion of the Project will be subject to site plan and design review pursuant to the design requirements outlined in the FWCC and any other applicable review processes. The final design of the buildings and other improvements, precise location of building footprints, location of utilities, determination of access points, and other design issues will be determined during that process and must be consistent with the Agreement and the Plan. 4 8. Waiver and Mutual Release of Claims of Invalidity. The City and Owner acknowledge and represent that the terms of this Agreement have been jointly negotiated and that each party enters into this Agreement voluntarily. Further, Owner and the City agree that this Agreement is authorized under law and each party waives any claim that the Agreement is invalid or illegal. The agreements and representations in this Section are material to this Agreement and are being relied upon by both Parties. 9. General Provisions. 9.1 Binding on Successors. 9.1.1 The Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their successors in interest, and may be assigned to any successor in interest to the Project property. 9.1.2 This Agreement is intended to protect the value of, and facilitate the use and development of, Parcel 5B and to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the City. Therefore, the covenants set forth herein shall be construed to and do touch and concern Parcel 5B and the benefits and burdens inuring to Owner and to the City from this Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon Owner, its heirs, successors, and assigns, and upon the City. 9.2 Governing_ Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. Venue for any action to enforce the terms of this Agreement shall be in King County Superior Court. 9.3 Severabilify. The provisions of this Agreement are separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. 9.4 Authori . The City and Owner each represents and warrants to the other that it has the respective power and authority, and is duly authorized, to execute and deliver this Agreement and that the persons signing on its behalf are duly authorized to do so. Owner further represents and warrants that it is the fee owner of Parcel 5B, that it has authority to agree to the covenants and provisions contained herein, and that there are no other persons, entities, or parties with any fee interest in Parcel 5B. 9.5 Amendment. This Agreement may be modified only by written instrument authorized by the City Council and duly executed by the City Manager and Owner, and their successors and assigns; provided, however, notwithstanding the provisions of this Agreement to the contrary, the City of Federal Way may, without the agreement of Owner, adopt and impose upon Parcel 5B restrictions and development regulations different than those set forth herein, if required by a serious threat to public health and safety. Moreover, five years after the date of the execution of the Agreement, the City may elect, without the agreement of Owner, to apply development regulations in effect at that time to any development within the scope of the Agreement that has not been completed at that time. 9.6 Exhibits. All exhibits attached hereto are incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth herein. 9.7 Headier. The headings in this Agreement are inserted for reference only and shall not be construed to expand, limit or otherwise modify the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 9.8 Integration; Scope of Agreement. This Agreement and its exhibits represent the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. There are no other agreements, oral or written, except as expressly set forth herein. This Agreement does not set forth all conditions applicable to the Project to the extent that additional conditions may be imposed as part of any permit issued by the City, as required by the Federal Way City Code as determined by the discretion of the Directors 'of the Departments of Community Development Services and/or Public Works. 9.9 Enforcement. Subject to the notice and cure provisions of this section, in the event either party fails to satisfy any of its obligations under this Agreement, the other party shall have the right to enforce this Agreement by an action at law for damages or in equity for specific performance. The Parties acknowledge that damages are not an adequate remedy for breach by either party. In addition to the remedies set forth herein, in the event of a breach of this Agreement by Owner, the City may enforce this Agreement under the enforcement provisions of the Federal Way City Code in effect at the time of the breach and/or it may terminate this Agreement and take action to amend the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation of the Parcel 5B. No party shall be in default under this Agreement unless it has failed to perform its duties or obligations under this Agreement for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice of default from the other party. A notice of default shall specify the nature of the alleged default and the manner in which the default maybe cured. If the nature of the default is such that it cannot be reasonably cured within thirty (30) days, then a party shall not be deemed in default if the party commences a cure within thirty (30) days and, thereafter, diligently pursues completion of the cure. 9.10 Attorneys_ Fees. In any action brought to enforce this Agreement or for damages resulting from a breach thereof, the prevailing party as determined by the court, shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees. . 9.11 Police Power. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to diminish, restrict or limit the police powers of the City granted by the Washington State Constitution or by general law. This Agreement is an exercise of the City's police powers, the authority granted under RCW 36.70B.170- .210, and other laws. 9.12 Recording, Assignment. The Agreement shall be recorded with the Real Property Records Division of the King County Records and Elections Department. 9.13 No Third Parties. The Agreement is made and entered into for the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. No other person or entity is an intended third party beneficiary. No other person or entity shall have any right of action under this Agreement. 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have hereunto placed their hand and seals on the day and year indicated. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, a Wa i on mun' ,ipal corporation BY:_ - David H. Moseley, City Manage Date: EST: % � y of May 2005. N. 'stdne Green, L Federal Way City Clerk Approved as to Form for City of Federal Way: I - a �, V Attorney, P' eta A. Rich dson STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. COUNTY OF G DONALD L. GARDNER INC., a Washington corporation 11, BY: UZ--- Donald L. Gardner President Date: 3 ri On this day, personally appeared before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, �-. 1�\ae,r4y\ev-to me known to be the "r-%"r ` of Donald L. Gardner Inc., a Washington corporation, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said eo oration for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated thaChdshe is authorized to rp , execute said instrument on behalf of said corporation. Given under myha,and official seal ' +ife�', If 29- I:i 'OF t�LZ1.i7!\T. this3� day of 2005. (rI tune) (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. , My commission expires: 7 L C� EXHIBIT A TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL 5B Exhibit A Plat of Wynstone Federal Way, Washington LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCELI: That portion of Government Lot 1, Section 19, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., records of King county, Washington, said portion being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 19; THENCE along the North line thereof South 89000' 18" East 335.78 feet: THENCE South 0195' 16" West 42.00 feet to the Southerly margin of the lands described in deed recorded under Recording No. 8501170665, records of King County, Washington; THENCE along said Southerly margin South 89°00' 18" East 18.07 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 658.00 feet; THENCE Easterly and Southeasterly 700.54 feet along said curve through a central angle of 60°59'59"; THENCE South 28°00' 19" East 422.43 feet to the true point of beginning and the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeast having a radius of 842.00 feet; THENCE Southeasterly 217.49 feet along said curve through a central angle of 14047'59" to a radial line of said curve which bears South 4711'42" West; THENCE leaving said margin along the non -tangent East line of said Government Lot South 01°13' 12" West 390.17 feet to the Southeast corner thereof; THENCE along the South line of said Government Lot North 88°59'20" West 561.92 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave to the Southeast having a radius of 897.03 feet (a radial line through said beginning bears North 74048'34" West); THENCE Northerly and Northeasterly 732.77 feet along said curve through a central angle of 46°48' 15" to the true point of beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. Tax Parcel No. 192104-9044-09 LEGAL DESCRIPTION continued PARCEL 2: That portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 19, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., lying Northerly of a line beginning on the Westerly line of said Government Lot at a point 412.00 feet Southerly of the Northwest corner thereof; THENCE East to the Easterly line of said Government Lot; EXCEPT the Westerly 264.00 feet thereof, AND EXCEPT that portion thereof described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Sectionl9; THENCE South 89°27'31" East along the North line thereof, a distance of 264.01 feet to the point of beginning; THENCE continuing South 89°27'31" East, a distance of 298.22 feet; THENCE South 21°47'27" West, a distance of 122.98 feet; THENCE South 70°08'00" West, a distance of 83.38 feet; THENCE South 53°44'33" West, a distance of 164.46 feet; THENCE North 36'15'27" West, a distance of 44.74 feet to the beginning of a 3 40. 00 foot radius curve the center of which bears South 53°44'33" West; THENCE Northwesterly along said curve trough a central angle of 05°00'38", an arc distance of 29.73 feet; THENCE North 01°06'36" East parallel with the West line of the Southwest quarter of said Northwest quarter, a distance of 183.39 feet to the point of beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. Tax Parcel No. 192104-9030-05 PARCEL 2A: An easement for ingress and egress over the South 30 feet of the West 264 feet of the North 412 feet of Government Lot 2, section 19, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., records of King County, Washington Situate in the County of King, State of Washington EXHIBIT B TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXHIBIT C TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT SECTION 6.2 RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS 10 3' 86' 12 12' 12' 1 6' 8' 3' lil. Sidewalk Planler Planter Sidewalk [liil Trip Slri 36' 70' MINIMUM SECTION PRINCIPAL MINOR COLLECTOR .3.0' CLASS A .67' CLASS A .50' CLASS A .85' CLASS E .50' CSTC .50' CSTC .50' CSTC OR OR .30' CLASS A .30' CLASS A .85' ATB .70' ATB 3 LANES SECTION M NOTES- 12m AVENUE SW ' PAGE --L-OFJ4-- PUBLIC WORKS ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR owc. No. DEPARTMENT 3-2M 4 J :1 O 0 r EXHIBIT �- PAGE-J_OFIL_ 38' _ � _ 6 ` 12' 1 1 ' 1 1 ' 6' 12' 12' 6' 8' 3' 00. Sidewalk �f Monier Left Turn Plonler Sidewalk !]!el strip [-12,-—16'--J --12'— Srri Median (where LT not needed) 64' 98, MINIMUM SECTION PRINCIPAL •MINOR .30' CLASS A .67' CLASS -A .85' CLASS E .50' CSTC .50' CSTC OR .30' CLASS A .85' ATB NOTES: i PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 4 LANES + MEDIAN SECTION E CAMPUS DRIVE SW EXHIBIT PAGE-3-OF-1 ARTERIAL DWG. NO. 3-2E �41 LAw�Pu s DR� . 6' P-Af.I.Qe1L .�i�17 bras GK LJO6, [emu cc r 3r xuiL-V— T79 4 �Q-- �Y�Pos�U � AT o� kf�►�S�tl� a EXH I B IT PAGE-�LOF A st,,5 CALKPus�- 03-1nz63o-Sul go"r Qo sc�Le AkCITY OF Federal November 5, 2003 Mr. Brad Plemmons 101 TStreet c Auburn. WA 98002 CITY HALL Wa 33530 1 st Way South • PO Box 9718 y Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 661-4000 www. cityoffederal way. com Re: File No. 03-102631-000-00-SE; PLANNING DIVISION 1" TECHNICAL REVIEw Wynstone..Prelirninary- Plat and CZA Amendment Gear ?:fir. Plemmons: The following correspardencc represents the Department of Community Development Service., N 1,:,a.cal review of the WynStOne preliminary plat application, which was deemed complete or. September LO, 2003. ATthis time, to furulter process the application, please address comments 1 -- 14 below. Plesn:'c resubmit six sets of any revised plan sheets and four nets of any revised technical documents. l . iks identified in the preapptication letter, City staff is supportive of limited grading and clearing b,e, yond those auras of ;Infrastructure construction. However, the existing tree plan identifies clearing and grading the entire site with the exception of the wetland buffer in the southwest corner of the site and a poition ct thm frontage along SW Campus Drive. Pursuant to Federal �i'ry City Cede (FWC,C:) Section 20-1 79_ e.xis- ng mature vegetation shall be retained to the maximum extent possible. City staff toes not support b:; extent of the proposed clearing and grading. ~Section 20-179 provides the primary basis for the City staff position on the clearing and grad Ing proposal, as the code requires preserving existing mature vegetation to the maximum extent possible. 'fhe preliminary clearing and grading plan and accompanying application materials: do not provide any rational in support t of clearing, and grading the whole site, or indicate any attempt to preserve existing vegetation beyond the wetland buffer and along Campus Drive. City staff also considered the following factors regarding the proposed clearing and grading limits for this site:- close proximity of the site to the Panther Lake Regional Drainage and Ipfiiltration Pond; erosion control; proNimity and visibility of the site from the abutting arterial street; and removal of all vegetation from the site, including all but approximately 36 significant trees. Factors such as convenience of balancing on -site materials and avoiding transporting excess materials off -site are not compei;ing reasons for City staff to support mass clearing and grading requests. City staff has identified the three follo►ving putertial scenarius or grading plans that could be supported by City staff. The first alternative for clearing and grading the site is to clear and grade the minimum area necessary for street and utility areas only. Under this scenario, clearing and grading: of lots would occur in conjunction with individual residential building permits. Mr. Brad Plemmons Page 2 November 5, 2003 A second clearing and grading plan alternative that could be supported by City staff is a phased plan to clear and grade roads and utility areas with the first phase, and may include a stockpile location (away from highly visible areas). A second phase for grading and clearing may include a block of lots where a portion of the stockpile material may be deposited, or where a series of concurrent grading permits have been requested and approved. Implementing a phased grading plan would improve the plat's ability to mitigate visual impacts, reduce erosion. result in temporary and long- term preservation of significant trees, and meet the intent of FWCC Section 20-179. A third alternative, which has previously been supported by City staff, is to provide a preliminary clearing and grading plan that includes clearing and grading roads and utility areas, with associated lot grading at an approximately 2:1 slope that would terminate at existing grade on the future lots, but not further than 20 feet from the right-of-way or approved utility areas. To receive staff support, please consider one of the three grading options outlined above. In any case, a written request and justification for clearing and grading beyond the infrastructure areas identified above must be included for staff review and consideration. In addition, in order to facilitate City staff review of proposed grading plans, provide cross section drawings of the proposed grading in the locations identified on the enclosed redline drawing. 2. City staff has not conducted a detailed review of the tree preservation plan at this time, in part based on the comments above regarding grading limits, and based on FWCC Section 20-179, requiring maintaining existing vegetation to the maximum extent possible. However, the significant tree plan will need to be revised to clarify compliance with the minimum 25 percent significant tree retention requirement. Please note for any future submittals, any tree preservation plan must clearly identify where the proposed retained trees are located. I understand the trees that are proposed for preservation are located generally in the wetland buffer and along Campus Drive; however, my review of the plan does not reveal retained significant trees. In addition, utility plans must be coordinated with clearing plans for any areas where trees are to be retained. In this regard, the generalized nature of the drainage improvement plan for Tract A does not provide sufficient detail to determine if associated grading would allow retention of the trees north of the drainage. 3. A separate tract for landscaping must be provided along Campus Drive. The proposed Tract A is for drainage and cannot include the landscape area along Campus Drive. This landscape tract would be owned and maintained by the future Wynstone homeowners association. The proposed landscape area width is 60 feet, as identified on the preliminary plat map. See additional comments below in item nine regarding clarification of proposed amendments to the concomitant zoning agreement (CZA). 4. Pursuant to Section 6.2 of the City's Addendum to the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and FWCC Sections 22-1566(b) and 20-186, a separate landscape tract is required between the 120' Place cul-de-sac and the proposed Tract A stormwater drainage tract. This landscape tract would be privately owned and maintained. File #03-102631-000-00-SE Doc. I.D. 24893 Mr. Brad Plemmons Page 3 November 5, 2003 5. The proposed ownership and maintenance of all proposed tracts must be clearly identified on the preliminary plat map. For example, the Tract A drainage must be labeled as "Tract A —to be dedicated to the City of Federal Way." It appears all proposed tracts except A and B (for stormwater) are private. 6. Tract G for pedestrian access must be aligned to remove the two 90 degree bends and provide a line - of -sight through the pedestrian area connecting through to Orchid Lane. In addition, the tract width needs to be increased to meet applicable City standards as discussed in the enclosed Public Works Traffic Division memo. Refer to FWCC Section 20-156 regarding pedestrian access standards. 7. Page four of the Habitat Technologies wetland report identifies a small isolated wetland less than 500 square feet exists on the site. However, the preliminary plat indicates an on -site wetland and identifies it as 1,029 square feet. Please reply to the following questions regarding the wetlands: ■ Please clarify the size discrepancy of the on -site wetland as identified on the preliminary plat map and wetland assessment report. or Was the on -site wetland actually surveyed, in order to determine the size? Note that the boundary survey does not identify the wetland. a The preliminary plat map must be clarified in regard to the wetland delineations, and identify on the preliminary plat map the actual environmental documents developed for the wetland delineation and evaluation. At this time, the City does not anticipate having our wetland consultant review the wetland report due to the following factors: a wetland and drainage corridor assessment by Habitat Technologies has been submitted and reviewed by City Planning Division staff-, and the small size of the on -site wetland, the previous confirmed location of the off -site wetland, and all other available environmental information does not identify the presence of wetlands on the site. However, the City does retain the right to consult with the City's wetland consultant if deemed necessary. Any review of the project by the City wetland consultant is conducted on a cost recover basis, to be pre -funded by the applicant, if necessary. 8. The four proposed multi -family lots could potentially yield a total of 17 multi -family units. Under the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement (CZA) for Parcel 5(b), a 60-foot wide landscape buffer and solid board fence is required where the multi -family zoning of Parcel 5(b) adjoins single-family zoning. The CZA also has a provision for one third of the project to be townhouse design units. Based on the following factors, future multi -family development on lots 45 — 48 may not be appropriate unless performance and design standards are proposed and/or implemented: consideration of the current design and buffering provisions in the CZA, potential incompatibility between proposed multi -family and single-family developments, and the geographic location of the proposed multifamily lots. As discussed at our meeting on August 13, 2003, in order to gain City staff support for the requested CZA amendment, you will need to propose implementing design and performance standards for these multi -family lots as part of the CZA amendment process. First, I suggest you consult the City's Doc. LD. 24893 File H03-102631-000-00-SE Mr. Brad Plemmons Page 4 November 5, 2003 Community Design Guidelines to review minimum architectural and site design guidelines applicable to all multi -family development (FWCC Section 22-1638[d][2]). City staff suggests implementing the following standards for these proposed multi -family lots: townhouse style development, attached garages, building size and/or unit limitations, etc., in addition to required compliance with the City's design guidelines. 9. The following section contains comments in response to your August 27, 2003, letter regarding proposed amendments to the CZA. Provisions from the CZA and your requested revision or amendment are summarized below. Staff has provided a response to each CZA provision and requested amendment. Additional information will be necessary to further evaluate the CZA amendment proposal as discussed in each section below. Please note that the staff comments below are based on the information submitted to date, are preliminary in nature, and subject to change in response to any changes to the proposal. Item 1: The applicant requests new language regarding staff support of the application by Plemmons to amend the CZA in accordance with the conditions outlined herein. Staff Comment: This is a new section, and is not currently contained in the CZA or amendment. The format and content of a CZA amendment has not yet been determined or drafted. The City staff recommendation on the CZA amendment and preliminary plat application will be provided to the Hearing Examiner through a written evaluation of the proposal and contained in the City's Staff Report. This staff report will be prepared and distributed at least one week prior to the public hearing. At this time, it is premature to determine the City staff recommendation. Please keep in mind that City staff desires to develop a favorable recommendation to the Hearing Examiner on the CZA amendment following appropriate design and conditioning of the proposed project. We encourage you to continue working with City staff to develop a code compliant and quality project design consistent with the City's comprehensive plan and decisional criteria for the underlying applications. Item 2A: The applicant requests to delete this section of the CZA, as it refers to King County Building Permit File No. C8902273. Staff Comment: Since the King County building permit application no longer exists, and is inapplicable to single-family development, staff supports this request in concept. Item 213: The current CZA requires implementing a 60-foot wide landscape buffer and solid board fence adjoining single family zoning. The applicant requests to reduce the current CZA provision for a 60-foot landscape buffer and solid board fence to a 20-foot wide Type II landscape buffer and eliminate the solid board fence. Staff Comment: Staff does not support eliminating current CZA provisions for a 60-foot landscape buffer and solid board fence, unless multi -family design provisions are implemented as discussed in item 8, above. Item 2C: The current CZA requires a minimum 60-foot building setback along Campus Drive. The applicant did not address this CZA provision, but the preliminary plat map shows a 60-foot wide landscape easement along Campus Drive. File 903-102631-000-00-SE Doc. LD_ 24893 Mr. Brad Plemmons Page 5 November 5, 2003 Staff ff Comment: The original intent of the 60-foot building setback was to protect the steep slopes adjacent to Campus Drive, and provide a landscape screen between Campus Drive and the planned project. According to the submitted materials, the slope along Campus Drive on the project site exceeds 40 percent slope and is regulated as a Geologically Hazardous Area (GHA). The proposed 60-foot landscape area protects the area of slope that exceeds 40 percent; however, FWCC Section 22-1286 also regulates development activity within 25-feet from the top and toe of the 40 percent slope. The proposed plat design identifies stormwater improvements are proposed within the 25-foot setback of the GHA. In concept, City staff is supportive of maintaining the proposed 60-foot landscape area along Campus Drive. Any intrusion within 25-feet of the top of the slope (such as the proposed stormwater facilities) and toe will require an analysis by a soils engineer, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1286. See item number 12 below for additional information pertaining to a soils report. Item 21): The current CZA requires widening Campus Drive along the entire length of the site. The applicant requests to change the CZA language to fit current conditions. Staff Comment: Public Works Department staff has indicated that construction of road improvements along Campus Drive SW, and at the intersection of IOth Avenue SW, would be required to be completed prior to recording the final plat per the City code requirements. Item 2E: The CZA permits a building height not to exceed 30 feet above averagebuilding elevation calculated from finished grade. The applicant requests to modify the CZA to have this provision apply solely to the multi -family portion of the project. Staff Comment: Staff suggests limited modification of this condition, and measurement of building height from the approved plat finish grade, to a maximum of 30 feet for structures, consistent with the underlying zoning code provisions for single-family and multifamily uses. Also, see the staff comment under item 8 above regarding two-story maximum height. Item 2F: This CZA provision pertains to a maximum allowed density of 347 units. The applicant requests revising the CZA to reflect multi -family area to be located on lots 45 — 48, and to retain the same proportionate density. Staff Comment: The density of 347 units is inapplicable. Staff does not understand the applicant's request and comment pertaining to proportionate density. Please provide clarification of comment regarding proportionate density. Item 2G: The CZA requires phased development of the 347 units. The applicant requests to delete the phasing requirement, due to the proposed limited area of multi -family use. Staff Comment: In concept, staff supports the request to eliminate the phasing requirement, as it is inapplicable to the current proposal. Item 211: The CZA requires 1/3 of the project to be townhouse design units. The applicant requests to delete this requirement based on current plans for multi -family use. Doc. I.D. 24893 File #03-102631-000-00-SE Mr. Brad Plemmons Page 6 November 5, 2003 Staff Comment: At this time, staff does not support eliminating the current CZA provisions for townhouse style development, unless multi -family design provisions are implemented as discussed in item 8, above. Item 3: The CZA requires set aside and dedication of 101h Avenue corridor, with CZA revisions contained in Resolution 93-144. The applicant requests to reflect current conditions and traffic mitigation and credits as proposed in Chris Brown's TIA. Staff Comment: Public Works Department staff has indicated they do not support any revisions to this CZA provision. New Item: The applicant requests to allow single-family use and plat on the site.. Staff Comment: This condition is supported in concept, provided elimination of multi -family use on lots 45 — 48, or acceptable design provisions, are implemented for these lots. 10. The SEPA checklist must be revised/clarified to address several items. One of the primary comments regarding the responses in the SEPA checklist pertains to the potential multi -family development. In summary, the SEPA checklist responses must at a minimum disclose the environmental impacts from the potential 17 multi -family units. The following sections must be revised on the SEPA checklist to identify the future potential multi -family development: ❖ (B8i) Population: Response of 168 housing unit count does not consider multi- family units. ❖ (Ma) Housing: Response is 485 (typo) but actually would be 44 single-family units and 17 multi -family units. ❖ (B14) Transportation: Vehicle trip generation and parking responses indicate development of 48 single-family lots and do not evaluate impacts from potential multi -family units. A redline copy of the SEPA checklist is enclosed for your review. The checklist must be revised as discussed above and pursuant to the redline comments on the SEPA checklist. 11. The response in the SEPA checklist identifies that a fee -in -lieu of providing on -site open is proposed. The PARCS Director has preliminarily approved fee in lieu for the single-family portion of the proposal. However, several comments regarding open space are discussed below, and must be resolved/clarified before proceeding with the SEPA and subdivision review. First, FWCC Section 22-667 identifying development standards for multi -family use requires open space in the amount of 400 square feet per multi -family unit. In addition, FWCC Section 20-155 requires open space or fee -in -lieu in the amount of 15 percent of the gross area of the site being subdivided. If you decide to pursue multi -family development on lots 45 — 48, then at this time, you may propose for review which of the two open space standards to implement on lots 45 — 48. Either a fee -in -lieu of on -site open space could be provided with the final plat review, or on -site open space per FWCC Section 22-667, could be implemented at the time of development of multi -family units. File NO3-102631-000-00-SE Doc. I.D. 24893 Mr. Brad Plemmons Page 7 November 5, 2003 The proposed open space must comply with the more restrictive of the two alternatives. If the multi- family lots were revised for single-family development, then a fee -in -lieu would be permissible with the platting process. In regard to more general comments about the proposed open space, City staff is supportive of a portion of the open space requirement being met by the following: buffer open space (along Campus Drive); conservation open space (wetland buffer); and usable open space (pedestrian tracts). Please review FWCC Section 20-155(a); identifying the various types of code defined open space to assist you in developing a revised open space proposal. 12. More detailed topographic information submitted with the preliminary plat application has revealed that a portion of the site adjacent to Campus Drive is a geologically hazardous area (GHA), as the slope exceeds 40 percent. FWCC Section 22-1286b states, "...development activity, land surface modifications or the installation of and maintenance of landscaping normally associated with residential, commercial or park use may not occur on or within 25 feet of a geologically hazardous area unless no reasonable alternative exists and then only if the development activity or land surface modification will not lead to or create any increased slide, seismic or erosion hazard." Since development is proposed within the GHA and within the 25-foot GHA setback, a soils report by a qualified professional engineer is required in conjunction with the SEPA and preliminary plat applications. This soils report must address all work on or within 25 feet of the 40 percent slope including, but not limited to, the following: the proposed roadway (i 0`h Avenue); stormwater improvements within the 25-foot GHA setback; any other improvements within 25 feet of the GI3A; and the elements listed in FWCC Section 22-1286(c)(1). Any improvements within 25 feet of the top or toe of the slope must be identified in the soils report and must meet the decisional criteria that no other reasonable alternative exists, and then only if the development activity or land surface modification will not lead to or create any increased slide, seismic, or erosion hazard. For any improvements located within 25 feet of the GHA, the applicant must identify how the, "...no other reasonable alternative, and the development activity or land surface modification will not lead to or create any increased slide, seismic or erosion hazard" criteria is met. 13. An October 28, 2003, review memo from Public Works Engineering Senior Engineering Plan Reviewer Kim Scattarella is enclosed for your review and response. Please respond to Mr. Scattarella's comments and revise the preliminary plans accordingly. 14. A November 4, 2003, review memo from Public Works Traffic Division Manager Rick Perez is enclosed for your review and response. Please respond to Mr. Perez's comments and revise the Traffic Impact Analysis and plans accordingly. 15. For your information, the City has not received any written comments on the proposal in response to the September 17, 2003, Notice of Application. Doc. LD. 24893 File #03-102631-000-00-SE Mr. Brad Plemmons Page 8 November 5, 2003 At this time, to further process the SEPA and preliminary plat applications, this issue must be further addressed. Please submit six sets of any revised plan sheets and four sets of any revised technical documents. Please be sure to include the Resubmittal Information form (enclosed) with any resubmittals. Please be advised that if the additional information requested above is not submitted within 180 days of the date of this letter, then the pending applications will expire. Contact me at iim-harris a.cit ❑ffederalwa .con, or 253-661-4019 if you have any questions or need any assistance. Sincerely, ,l im Harris Senior Planner enc: Resubmittal Information Form Public Works Development Services Review Memo From Kim Scattarella, October 28, 2003 Public Works Traffic Division Memo From Rick Perez, November 4, 2003 Lakehaven Utility District Memorandum, July 10, 2003 Community Design Guidelines Redline SEPA Checklist Redline Cross Section for Grading c: Kim Scattarella, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Rick Perez, Traffic Division Manager File 403-102631-000-00-SE Doc. CD. 24893 August 27, 2003 Mr. Jim Harris, Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1" Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 Dear Mr. Harris: AAA r This constitutes a formal request to modify the existing Concomitant Agreement including Amendments Adopted by Resolutions 93-128 and 93-144 affecting Parcel 513 by way of a "Process V, Quasi -Judicial Project Rezone". This incorporates the amended Concomitant Agreement with respect to Plemmons party, Parcel 5B. Modifications of the Concomitant (including all previous amendments thereto) as follows: 1. Staff Support for Amendment to Concomitants. The City staff agrees to support an application by Plemmons to amend the Concomitant in accordance with `the conditions outlined herein. 2. Delete section 2A. 2. A. [Delete section 2A]. • sTfTi� _ yY 3. Revise 2B to reflect the reduction of landsca e buffer to a 20 foot t e Il and delete the followinr, sentence. RESUBMITTED SEP 0 3 2003 t r Jim Harris Senior Planner 8/13/03 -2- 4. Revise italicized portion of 2D To fit current conditions. (text currently unchanged) Campus Drive, along the entire length of the subject property and parcel 7, shall be widened, in accordance with the applicable City standards, to allow for a center turn lane. This improvement shall be constructed and completed prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for the first phase of the project. Provided, however, in the event that the roadway widening cannot be completed prior to the time of occupancy on phase one of the project, and such delays have not been caused or contributed to by owners and are beyond owners' control, then, owners may apply to the City for authorization to post a bond in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Federal Way Zoning Code to assure the construction of the required improvements and, upon the approval and the posting of a bond in compliance with the City Codes, occupancy permits may be issued provided all other terms and conditions of this Agreement and all of the applicable provisions of the Federal Way codes have otherwise been fully complied with. 5. Revise 2E to apply solely to multi -family portion of the project For that portion of the project developed as multi -family, the building height shall not exceed 30 feet above average building elevations calculated from finished grade for the subject property in compliance with the provisions of the Federal Way Zoning Code. 6_ Revise2F to reflect multi -family area revised to be located onlots 45-48 and to retain same proportionate density. (Text currently unchanged). GOODSTEIN.doe Jim Harris Senior Planner 8/13/03 -3— The maximum density that might otherwise mathematically be calculated for the subject property shall be reduced from 383 units to 347 units. Owners acknowledge that fewer than 347 units may, in fact, be allowed on the subject property as a result of meeting the requirements of the new Federal Way Zoning Code and related ordinances of the City that are and shall be applicable to this development. 7. Revise 2G to delete phasing requirement. than 100 units are de•.eleped ..,-,d e"giti..0 ed ithe fifst ic phase, the first > and an additio a! 109 units in the seee , u in the 8. Revise 2H to delete townhouse requirement based on current plans for limited multi -family use/scopeL. 9. Revise 3 to reflect current conditions and traffic mitigation and credits as proposed in Traffic Impact Analysis- --repared by Chris Brown. and Associates. Text current unchanged). The Owners shall agree to set aside and dedicate to the City the necessary right-of-way corridor as established by the Federal Way City Council, subsequent to the date of incorporation, for the extension of loth Avenue S.W./3441h right-of-way corridor. The City Council shall agree to use its best efforts to complete the corridor route designation on or before April 3, 1990, but not later than May 1, 1990. The right-of-way for the route GOODSTEIN.doc Jim Harris Senior Planner 8/ 13/03 -4— thus established shall be dedicated by Owners to the City prior to building permit issuance on either parcel 5 or 7. .10 Add new section. The Concomitant is revised to allow a sin le famil residential plat acid single-family use pursuant to the underlyingI1,M zone on the Parcel 5B. Thank you for .your effort with this 'modification. Sincerely, Brad P)emmon n GOODSTEIN.doc LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT 316271st Avenue South ♦ P. O. Box 4249 ♦ Federal Way, WA 98063 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA OF: July 10, 2003 ATTN: Mr. Jim Harris Senior Planner SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 7 - Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03 -10263 0-00- SU/03-102631-00-SE/03 -10263 2-00-UP COMMENTS: A developer extension agreement will be required to extend mainline water and sewer facilities to serve the site. Owner should apply separately to the District for this process as soon as possible to avoid delays in construction. Please allow 3 to 4 months for plan review and approval. SEPA: Construction activities have not been described as required in Section 16.b of the checklist. Construction of twelve -inch (12") water main should be addressed specifically. LOW Mary � Youpg C) Devel pment Services Supervisor Direct Line: (253) 946-5400 FAX: (253) 529-4081 E-mail: myoung@lakehaven.org Date: % o 3 SSLO-OSB (£SZ) 'eN xoj 9f60-OSB (fSZ) oN aW4d I£096 -vm aooLd 4140E 41^°5 6f96 ' JN12�33NIJN3 �:J303'df '15 4A4Cf NS v /AS 3AV 44ZI NVld 9NOV80 Ad NIM13Nd 3NOISNA iaapa ��i Ia'ItM+r SNOAN31d OVNH = LE a C U ■ I t$ c �5 U 77 / fft M 9 - ml V �. .j �• �� � �C� fi ^-77i _l.'��.HT"t'"� ,�Y y�� �.��51A� /���f%/j�� r / /,. CE Ir cn ��� �o�- � - �' Y �',� tip. '•"_ a ��� ' d •t .sal s� �_ _ ,`' I �I y rr� fYui 3 � ; i Vie'= � �•� + r • '-/3 Iti� •-•� I w =i I If _ I r1r 01 F- a- i N� 1 M J� nn Your Community Newspaper - Affidavit of Publication Debbie Kaufman, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a semi -weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a semi -weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained at the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a Legal Advertisement by City of Federal Way L-622 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 17th day of September- 2003 , and ending on the 17th day of September, 2003 , both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 12 .16 which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.090 Subscribed to and sworn before me this 23rd day of September, 2003. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way 1414 SO.324TH STREET, SUITE B210, FEDERALWAY,WA 98003 ■ 253-925-5565 0 FAX:253-925-5750 LEGAL P CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Community Development Services Department NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: Wynstone Preliminary Plat Description: Proposal to subdivide two ex- isting parcels comprised of an approximately 13.49 acre site into 48 separate residential lots. Four of the proposed lots are proposed to retain multi -family zoning, while the re- maining 44 lots are proposed for single-fam- ily residential use. The project includes con- structing street improvements, storm drain- age facilities, and utility improvements. The applicant has also requested a revision to the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement applicable to a portion of the site. Applicant: Brad Plemmons Location: Between Campus Drive and the northern terminus of 12th Avenue SW, north of Sherwood Forest Elementary School and north of the plat of Orchid Lane. The pro- posed project also abuts the east side of Saghalie Park. Date Application Received: June 26, 2003 Date of Notice of Application: September 17. 2003 Date Determined Complete: September 10, 2003 Permits Required by this AppIIcaIfon: 1. State Environmental Po icy Act (SEPA) (File #03-102631-00-SE) 2- Preliminary Plat (Fife 903-102630-00- SU) 3. Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment (File #03-102632-00-UP) Existing Environmental Documents: Stormwater Drainage Technical Information Report, Wetland Assessment, Traffic impact Analysis, School Access Analysis Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: X YES NO Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy" (SEPA); FWCC Chapter 19, "Planning and Development"; FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; FWCC Chapter 21, "Surface and Stormwater Man- agement"; and FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning" Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be re- viewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations including the FWCC; King County Surface Water Design Manu- a] as amended by the City of Federal Way, and ling County Road Standards as amend- ed by the City - Any person may submit written comments on the Notice of Land Use Application to the Di- rector of Community Development Services by October 1, 2003. The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (address below). Any person has the right to submit written comments to the Hearing Ex- aminer and appear at the public hearing of the Hearing Examiner to give comments orally. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 15 days prior to the scheduled hearing date- Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hear- ing Examiner may challenge the recommen- dation of the Hearing Examiner. Contact: Jim Harris, Senior Planner, 253- 661-4019 City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 FWM#-622 Published September 17, 2003 CITY OF Federal September 17, 2003 Mr. Brad Plemmons 101 T Street SE Auburn, WA 98002 CITY HALL Wa y 33530 1st Way South • PO Box 9718 ���Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 661-4000 www.cityoffederalway.com F�;.E Re: File No. 03-102631-00-SE; Notice of Complete Application; Wynstone Preliminary Plat Dear Mr. Plemmons: The Department of Community Development Services received your application on June 26, 2003, for the Wynstone Preliminary Plat Application. Additional information was submitted to the City on August 6, 2003, and September 3, 2003, in response to the City's July 16, 2003, notice of incomplete application. Based on a review of your submittal relative to those requirements for a preliminary plat application, your application is deemed complete as of September 10, 2003. Please consider this as a Letter of Completeness. A Notice of Land Use Application will be published in the Federal Way Mirror on September 17, 2003, which is within two weeks of the date of complete application as required by City code. In addition, at that time other public notice will be given based on City procedures, and you have posted three large notice boards on the site. A sign installation certificate must be completed and returned to our office by September 19, 2003. A copy of the sign posting instructions is enclosed. At this time, we will begin a code -related review of the project. Based on that review, if additional information or modifications to plans are required to meet code, we will notify you in writing. I expect to have my initial technical review completed in approximately two weeks. Please call me at 253-661-4019 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 15 Senior Planner enclosure Doc. I.D. 24640 HESUEMITTE TMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33530 First Way South Off OP �• R E U E M I iTE PO Box 9718 111 1 1 GP4eral Way WA 98063-9718 ~�— SEP 1 7 20 253-661-4000; Fax 253-661-4129 www.ci.federal-wayma.us SIGN INSTALLATION CERTIFICATE Project Name: W b 54V%-e_ Project File No: 0'3` 1 o ac-P 3 1 - S `�_ Project Address: F 03 100 (o3o - 5'" Installed By: v� ��� S Date of Installation: Location of Installations I r�` ��• sf a��a�etl Etl .,�, �, ,�> .�> Ero .ter .�. .��, •��> ,�s> I�ca- =��F <�,ar.��> 4.EE-Etl-f4%tl%tl E9 I9 A !tl Etl Etl Ed Ili .. es> .per •ax• ,,,> ,�> .,�.. -ten .�, <�. <,c> .�> ..m> .gee u. <�. .�. I hereby testify that the sign installed fully complies with the installation standards of the Department of Community Development Service's "Instructions for Obtaining & Posting Public Notification Signs" and that the sign will be maintained until a final decision is issued on the land use action. I understand that failure to return this certificate within five days of posting may result in delays, notice of corrections, and re -mailings at the applicant's expense. Installer's Name Date Installer's Signature �a6-0--73 -�'-(3 Phone Bulletin #036 —July 19, 2001 Page 1 of 1 kAHandouts — Revised\Sign Installation Certificate It r .... ......... } -'� f r /f ' A 0---, •.�''' 1 cb 1 ...........:. ...: ! _m cn s n ................ ......Ln ...............•.... d --- '' .► �l� ' £N ••,.• i � y e � � •i , ,� 1 , s.,.•• •'•� f 19 � � �e. ��r ! 11 ski U1 •..,, .� ? .......l ..'� �.. r .}'� ' ••'''''' ' ' 8-Gl I i ,o0 1 ° 4� Ct • '� 1. 0. - �' • •t. ,. r '� . ' 1 t V"� Ki w t3Q. ' a .72 •` { _ 111-4 low Gr' ._.; _ .fix.= I At MAC ' u' - w •-..pia r • - N �V,•} 1 jj7... -t . ......... .-•- --V WL ��, o,' ' y1 ' �Yrrr.� ••'s.t y fVI I '•' C m r - 1'A• so 1 1 'A • ^ ryti--. -�•� -6. f r �f : I r ��i . •• 5 - 7'Si• ♦� Z 1Z _ } 9 .• ai ..., .••rr C rn rn ••�y�•{i N'' '� ; -' - �{ Syr �- o;......... ......• .. ..........':Pc•' N t r n.S. ,�• t.:� 09 mC)Ab C s .. •_ry.... ...............%L . 1 r�4 o y`. yrF ■ _ f•�lp� v -rv- r. - �fJ(! .•�.. A ............. ler til,�i-r i �°S YI i �1...-J r �� �.- •:r5- _. !AWOL 340 340 Ila fly wk ' �' r'� _ � � .�• }.,- ' I 1--' ' .-.. 4 �_- � � ::icy:.:. . .r •r•''•'•• ,:•. .:• �/T°1 I i�' V ��p` anti r .` - of �. / 1/i r' II i ! - iri ..._.- .._� - Fes• �' 1 . •i ••• t T f' i j �/ ' b r r I 50' c� n Sti o OL4 ��,. -• �1 ` /. .r. �� nr D •T •• � I � ` � r I � I t !� Ufa'-G v ,r ' I �f _ �4� _ rS - � ._... �• �-. r�- yI r .r'' � r ,� •, �. i � �, r , � �' +'` � r � _W � / q - � U655YA1f�,_. � I � • r r ti- , o� �� �'•••••......... � � w' � \�- � '�+.�. / Iso' � J � Y ��-.mf•r�rar r r • � . of 1 t . • oZ " �' I � � r �. l � '� p�- / ` �' -- � - ::� �% fsor / ��� so �" Lsr+,►som ��� �.� � ,rr ,. •ram v ,; 1 �� ` r � � r.��,j� _..-... _ - .. f /f I- /�''� •ems- �•�_.- - /`� r. . :�`� r L - CMr . •..,r / S I / f V 'r LlY I L / «..P-.�l• 3�a ....�_ 9r''r. ' ' T%"" f : j i rr' 5 t- '1 r t DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 CITY OF Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-661-4000; Fax 253-661-4129 Federal Way www.ciiyoffecieralway.com ii yoff eciera lwa y_. com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 5 hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, t a: Notice of Land Use Application/Action ///❑��\ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed Xe-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on _AJ 1/.?,- 2003. Project Name File Number(s) Signature 1.=` Date -S C>C K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 8/1/2003 1:18 PM CITY OF MEMORANDUM Federal Way Community Development Services Department NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: Wynstone Preliminary Plat Description: Proposal to subdivide two existing parcels comprised of an approximately 13.49 acre site into 48 separate residential lots. Four of the proposed lots are proposed to retain multi -family zoning, while the remaining 44 lots are proposed for single-family residential use. The project includes constructing stree improvements, storm drainage facilities, and utility improvements. The applicant has also requested a revision to the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement applicable to a portion of the site. Applicant: Brad Plemmons Location: Between Campus Drive and the northern terminus of 12'' Avenue SW, north of Sherwood Forest Elementary School and north of the plat of Orchid Lane. The proposed project also abuts the east side of Saghalie Park. Date Application Received.• June 26, 2003 Date of Notice of Application: September 17, 2003 Date Determined Complete: September 10, 2003 Permits Required by this Application: 1. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (File #03-102631-00-SE) 2. Preliminary Plat (File #03-102630-00-SU) 3. Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment (File #03-102632-00-UP) Existing Environmental Documents: Stormwater Drainage Technical Information Report, Wetland Assessment, Traffic Impact Analysis, School Access Analysis Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: X YES NO Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy" (SEPA); FWCC Chapter 19, "Planning and Development"; FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; FWCC Chapter 21, "Surface and Stormwater Management"; and FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning" Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations including the FWCC; King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by the City of Federal Way, and King County Road Standards as amended by the City. Any person may submit written comments on the Notice of Land Use Application to the liirector or uommunny Development Services by October 1, 2003. The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (address below). Any person has the right to submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner and appear at the public hearing of the Hearing Examiner to give comments orally. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 15 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may challenge the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner. Contact: Jim Harris, Senior Planner, 253-661-4019 City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Published in The Federal Way Mirror: September 17, 2003 Doe ID #24594 From: Tina Piety To: Deb Grigg Date: 9/12/03 8:11 AM Subject: Re: Legal Notices Hello Deb, When I came in this morning one of the first emails I read was from our MIS Division saying that there was a problem with our email system and external emails did not go out until 5.30 last night. So, I was not surprised to read your email saying you didn't receive the documents til almost 6:30. Please publish them in Wednesday's (7/17/03) issue. For both documents, please change the following dates: At about the fifth paragraph it says, Date of Notice of Application, please change that from September 13, 2003, to September 17, 2003. Please change the date in the first sentence of the last full paragraph from September 29, 2003, to October 1, 2003. At the bottom of the documents where it says, Published in The Federal Way Mirror, please change the date from September 13, 2003, to September 17, 2003. If you need, I can resend you the documents with the changes already made. Thank you, >>> "Deb Grigg" <dgrigg@soundpublishing.com> 09/11/03 06.25PM >>> 1 am so sorry - this just arrived 6:22 p.m. There's no way I can get them in Saturday's paper. We had trouble earlier with another legal sent from Faith. I can put them up on-line or run them Wednesday the 17th. I will also have my Tech check out our email server. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tina Piety" <Tina.Pie ci offederalwa .com> To: <admin fedwa mirror.com> Cc: <d ri sound ublishin .com> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 8:47 AM Subject: Legal Notices Please publish the attached legal notices (Brighton NOA, 03-103182-00-SE, & Wynstone NOA, 03-102631-00-SE) in Saturday's (9/13/03) issue. Please furnish an affidavit of publication. Thank you. CC: admin@fedwaymirror.com; Greg Fewins; Jim Harris 40k CITY Federalo. Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-661-4000; Fax 253-661-4129 www.c i tyaf Ped eTa I W aY. Com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 11 hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the Sta�eo�fWasUngto�nthat , a: 13 Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or Aposted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2003. Project Name File Number(s) Signature Date ! 1l KACD Adminisfrolion Files\Declaration of Dislribulion.doc/Lasl prsled 01/ 19/2003 10:30 AM Posted Locations 1. Federal Way Regional Library — 34200 lst Way South, Federal Way, WA 2. Federal Way 320th Branch Library — 848 South 320th Street, Federal Way, WA 3. Federal Way City Hall — 33530 1" Way South, Federal Way, WA CITY OF MEMORANDUM Federal Way Community Development Services Department NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: Wynstone Preliminary Plat Description: Proposal to subdivide two existing parcels comprised of an approximately 13.49 acre site into 48 separate residential lots. Four of the proposed lots are proposed to retain multi -family zoning, while the remaining 44 lots are proposed for single-family residential use. The project includes constructing stree improvements, storm drainage facilities, and utility improvements. The applicant has also requested a revision to the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement applicable to a portion of the site., Applicant. Brad Plemmons Location: Between Campus Drive and the northern terminus of 12`h Avenue SW, north of Sherwood Forest Elementary School and north of the plat of Orchid Lane. The proposed project also abuts the east side of Saghalie Park. Date Application Received: June 26, 2003 Date of Notice of Application: September 13, 2003 Date Determined Complete: September 10, 2003 Permits Required by this Application: 1. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (File #03-102631-00-SE) 2. Preliminary Plat (File #03-102630-00-SU) 3. Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment (File #03-102632-00-UP) Existing Environmental Documents: Stormwater Drainage Technical Information Report, Wetland Assessment, Traffic Impact Analysis, School Access Analysis Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: X YES NO Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy" (SEPA); FWCC Chapter 19, "Planning and Development"; FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; FWCC Chapter 21., "Surface -and Stormwater Management"; and FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning" Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations including the FWCC; King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by the City of Federal Way, and King County Road Standards as amended by the City. Any person may submit written comments on the Notice of Land Use Application to the Director of uommumry Development Services by September 29, 2003. The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (address below). Any person has the right to submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner and appear at the public hearing of the Hearing Examiner to give comments orally. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 15 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may challenge the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner. Contact: Jim Harris, Senior Planner, 253-661-4019 City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Published in The Federal Way Mirror: September 13, 2003 Doc ID #24554 �I Vicinity Mal) Sf60-099 AZ) "°V�• � �Tawi � €FFONI2J3:3NION3 V41 r�H Nb7d lbld IdVNIWll321dQJ,OZ 9hoS 6166 t3NOlSN,IM SNO"N3ld OV89 a % S { aJ-- f i �JO C S y-`d w �g H.Y•N -� °� � 1 .0 U Q G C Z U] � � � G IU/1 i� ¢ 1Y�•. '+J. 11 c5f TV! i.n (rLyy����i f1 [ Q%q orW �i l��•l. U Q `'t-JJ,�`�'W�� �•~ � W �o,s„ Qi M w •V s ��v1� ~ - � Ir^r O N N C1 O O vJ Z n . .. =Uti iaBV C6i Ow p tiffo w`a NCFwa $8 6£ c c] I �i by •Y,''•i '.G„ww o yo C zz. VO !!! �i �• r c cc c � C cn 8 -___ 1 \ _ r ��•� r��+ 1 - I L f! I � � 1 1 r%/y f. � �' ys'a, i �r'�~V� �G.l � I '1 ' 1 � `p. At jL ��--_,_ f;��- f2>�xPl,.•swF ;, ,',-�:;•:;{ ; ' ~ ����; t `'�i.j •, fry Y,"I � ��y � �(�•}� � �^�7� � � J' ��� f� 7 ��b,i.�'-� f"'4,�� �_r,.- �` f,��/ R1�1 •N� � fit/ � �I / �_ r =��. .,*tcr.�. '�? � r�� '-r•4� �� �',r'y�:�3'i� / ,•r ; �: �, � `-y: `,� � I •ri:'' ' 1 r rk�+ r f . a; ir��• ]f �� � � �- •r �}' � l ���-��������"� � f .� '"'•�' `^ �� _^_ _ f sir f`_'—^ ,x f.i �Mr�'•,.'�� I t��:�i �, � �. % r' .°&� • ' i;Jy r•� � - � ' : �.1"' �� � �r� � � � r. � . .,< '� '�`4��.� ' #� may` , z a •�----• .''t' _ �r '�k. • NJ, �.-n• a . ¢,I _ r '�ti w— _'�1 ty LIP � B�taC�E �g� '!,r' � � � t�r^r .?-� '1�•i � � • �� ra •' ' i i ,� • I •F"•' -�� � �n � ����5� ��`� f' ��� \� �"---ter_ -�. _ � ~ f •'ra� I'= � ..�i�, _.y`,� f q i r �r I i F �-sJx"'R S & _ 33L Mtl- aka * ,� �J -\ `_ EI� ? �• �� aa�M,. ' M. I l•I -'!I. i1 f_ •-� 'I Vr Wit; 53 A•��� � Y C � � y ;1 �� � %' �"^�i� �+•+i �bc_D14 ya f y. ��� •.: y l -��\ � o Z � ��K a�_ �Ry i �r gg$iY�"� x�-_..} E-5 � gy i r , cn ��r R � 7•.: ; . f' :Ar Itl It9 Y g=Y B 5: seayy C # bfi r r, xa�z o �:gSx � �Iw �Ygr a 111% 19 -;A b.-]i (1 y.xe t •'fix rsItr.; 41k CITY 1 � Federalo. Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-661-4000; Fax 253-661-4129 www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, Sle VffW G14-Ck hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: VL Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ TO In PP4T-60 IV anC€ AF was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or at each of the attached addresses on /f7 2003. Project Name W ' S r File Number(s) U 3._% UD-(3 1 0D-5 �U 3 - -d(r5 U ��- - Signature Date o K:\CD Administralion Res\Declaralion of Dislribufion.dochosl pr; •led 01/19/2003 10:30 AM Posted Locations 1. Federal Way Regional Library — 34200 1" Way South, Federal Way, WA 2. Federal Way 320th Branch Library — 848 South 320th Street, Federal Way, WA Federal Way City Hall — 33530 lst Way South, Federal Way, WA 4. North end of 12th Ave SW ajacent to Sherwood Forest Elementary School 5. West entrance of Saghalie Park 6. Intersection of loth Ave SW and SW Campus Park Drive CITY of MEMORANDUM Federal Way Community Development Services Department NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: Wynstone Preliminary Plat Description: Proposal to subdivide two existing parcels comprised of an approximately 13.49 acre site into 48 separate residential lots. Four of the proposed lots are proposed to retain multi -family zoning, while the remaining 44 lots are proposed for single-family residential use. The project includes constructing street improvements, storm drainage facilities, and utility improvements. The applicant has also requested a revision to the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement applicable to a portion of the site. Applicant: Brad Plemmons Location: Between Campus Drive and the northern terminus of 121h Avenue SW, north of Sherwood Forest Elementary School and north of the plat of Orchid Lane. The proposed project also abuts the east side of Saghalie Park. Date Application Received: June 26, 2003 Date of Notice of Application: September 17, 2003 Date Determined Complete: September 10, 2003 Permits Required by this Application: 1. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (File #03-102631-00-SE) 2. Preliminary Plat (File #03-102630-00-SU) 3. Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment (File #03-102632-00-UP) Existing Environmental Documents: Stormwater Drainage Technical Information Report, Wetland Assessment, Traffic Impact Analysis, School Access Analysis Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: X YES NO Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy" (SEPA); FWCC Chapter 19, "Planning and Development"; FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; FWCC Chapter 21, "Surface and Stormwater Management"; and FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning" Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations including the FWCC; King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by the City of Federal Way, and King County Road Standards as amended by the City. Any person may submit written comments on the Notice of Land Use Application to the virector or t_;ommumry Development Services by October 1, 2003. The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (address below). Any person has the right to submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner and appear at the public hearing of the Hearing Examiner to give comments orally. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 15 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may challenge the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner. Contact: Jim Harris, Senior Planner, 253-661-4019 City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Published in The Federal Way Mirror: September 17, 2003 Doc ID #24594 CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-661-4000; Fax 253-661-4129 www.ciiyQffederoLway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, �— hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the Statd 6f Washington, that a: Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other was kailed ❑ faxed 2003. Project Name ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner - ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on - . - I>w.G ��► ► �► it � � _� 11�+i 1>� . ' +. Date ciwl�� K:\CO Adminislrafion Files\Dedarafion of Dislribution.doc/Last prinled 01/31/200308:49 AM CITY OF MEMORANDUM Federal IILlay Community Development Services Department NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: Wynstone Preliminary Plat Description: Proposal to subdivide two existing parcels comprised of an approximately 13.49 acre site into 48 separate residential lots. Four of the proposed lots are proposed to retain multi -family zoning, while the remaining 44 lots are proposed for single-family residential use. The project includes constructing stree improvements, storm drainage facilities, and utility improvements. The applicant has also requested a revision to the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement applicable to a portion of the site. Applicant: Brad Plemmons Location: Between Campus Drive and the northern terminus of 121h Avenue SW, north of Sherwood Forest Elementary School and north of the plat of Orchid Lane. The proposed project also abuts the east side of Saghalie Park. Date Application Received: June 26, 2003 Date of Notice of Application: September 17, 2003 Date Determined Complete: September 10, 2003 Permits Required by this Application: 1. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (File #03-102631-00-SE) 2. Preliminary Plat (File #03-102630-00-SU) 3. Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment (File #03-102632-00-UP) Existing Environmental Documents: Stormwater Drainage Technical Information Report, Wetland Assessment, Traffic Impact Analysis, School Access Analysis Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: X YES NO Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy" (SEPA); FWCC Chapter 19, "Planning and Development"; FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; FWCC Chapter 21, "Surface and Stormwater Management"; and FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning" Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations including the FWCC; King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by the City of Federal Way, and King County Road Standards as amended $y the City, Any person may submit written comments on the Notice of Land Use Application to the iiireCLOr Ui wiuiiiunny Development Services by October 1, 2003. The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (address below). Any person has the right to submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner and appear at the public hearing of the Hearing Examiner to give comments orally. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 15 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may challenge the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner. Contact: Jim Harris, Senior Planner, 253-661-4019 City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Published in The Federal Way Mirror: September 17, 2003 Doc ID #24594 77 >£60-099 (_SZ) 'ON uu Vd IC096 'VAI 'l '-M a I& 4:;OZ qGS V6; SNI A33NION3 3303Vf 'S k NVId 1V7d .INVNI a 3NOISN.IM I-h SNOWW3-Id OV89 d �o w D5 � v ON W w O C, S N _ ir- Q' N� aao 8^0 �Sr}iii Uyc3��F Wu , �- ��Nm wz M fO rc¢n J ,� tom" o 3S"$�7� N� [A=� z )S�-ovcoi 400FrG ti .. 0 8 . z I.i x �r�t �000 O Crwm ¢rc¢4¢Fr� fN6 rr www O Zzo 00 1 y U c� t ❑ a 1 I N i+ I _42Ln ri aft 60 K-9- � 1 li! �1 Il,.sr. r• or �i'` �% '�;,�—•x�y+r"- � — ' y � PL'BYY `•'r � � -�� � �`` ! .�".,� '��,�1 I / � ' i f n �ilr r�l• J +� tlyYr lllf •��- p .i I ti' r I I .�/� I � -z�`-r-" .�I r'_•' �ji ��rri 1�i ✓IS T iAT y�� I v �-- f —t _ n� I fib"p !�lJflYr �~ �` �4 ��a�J t� '^��^�-� `� /��_ •���~ ��` r :{�,1 � tJjF�q ia'�'5i!r JM. 1 �$.-�i�.r •} �r+t _•tr - ��~• � � rw�` / �:-" `i-' J - /,aT-zr f,�. Y � i'� .�,,.� ��v RS I ��r�� � `� J �•=�.-�'��-._. r �•r�•' .%'J,,.•�. I ` r +,,. �• •,yy; �i icy. 7Q� r—•'' / ` rs °`' `JIr f/ r i.+• + its w •S'l,L� r041 LLJ "�`. _,-' �- �'' .�.-�:-:�• - �' `tea=ram( {j{' o�l�� ��C4`r �� i f 1 ¢ � o cr ~ ! f i+ jam_ _ •.=+xt- ^�y. �. �^4✓� l r� . -a 3` i L_ -v H F N it —2-ye a v=i yea"ejs �' i 7 -y I z OF b����� iajj� N � 1 • } � �`'" '`�le� �i 'i' r i r f �t �--- ;' � (/+ ! 15 o-_--------- ----- wa,Qa = 'q 5�<w� a-- o � o:o ,�,wN X� ao W<oi oNW�$�5 PGk��� �-ww5�.�^ -._ .-] if N �• � .�' ]� SN �� z sY3=e�3z��Wo =�`Je _= i aC 3 0 - - <ggFu •gym€w'm"aW` �i r c; i ��- F Fug �z�i,c S"s'din�"ao Inn -2gf ��o 5o=rvo8 Z j:H -< �_ ewer- i� � .�<w�y����s "=-�Sea��`W Sig -�'z$ S•€ -`"€3`� a awe "a�ne� W oW n "�w�Wai<eNV .gw=x u Q oho ima4'zGW€r' Vicinity Main 5���em h� c �om3 Vicinity Map 1 � _ # 1 *-------------- MetroScan / King . -------------------------------* baaner :Glen Park Associates Lic• Parcel # :192104 9005 06 Site :1002 SW Campus Dr Federal Way Sale Date :07/27/2000 Mail :2150 N 107th St #370 Seattle Wa 98133 Sale Price :$31,686,000 Full Use :011 Res,Apartment Asd.V :$15,842,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 5 N 1/2 OF NW Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 B1dgSF:274,063 Ac:16.82 YB:1989 Ph: # 2 ---------------------: MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Campus Grove L1c;Born Lloyd W Parcel # :192104 9006 05 Site :33715 loth Ave SW Federal Way Sale Date :01/11/2000 Mail :PO Box 178 Bow Wa 98232 Sale Price Use :011 Res,Apartment Asd.V :$6,968,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 6 POR GL 1 SEC Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 B1dgSF:149,534 Ac:6.86 YBT1990 Ph: # 3 ---------- MetroScan / King •---------- — -------------------* Owner :Klak Golf Llc Parcel # :192104 9008 03 Site :700 SW Campus Dr Federal Way Sale Date :10/11/2000 Mail :122 S Michigan Ave #1000 Chicago I1 60603 Sale Price :$850,000 Use :301 Vacant,Multi-family Asd.V :$2,341,700 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 8 SE 1/4 OF NW Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:17.92 YB: Ph: # 4 *--------------------- : MetroScan / King :------•-------------------------* Owner :Papke Daniel P/Susan D;+ Parcel # :192104 9019 .00 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :07/03/2001 Mail :PO Box 3649 Federal Way Wa 98063 Sale Price :$160,000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$156,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 19 S 1/5 OF GL 2 Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:4.53 YB: Ph: # 5 *-------------------------: MetroScan / King :--------------------__--___---------* Owner :Nelson John & Jo Ellen Parcel # :192104 9024 03 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :07/08/1986 Mail :PO Box 3229 Federal Way Wa 98063 Sale Price :$11,000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$46,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 24 W 160 FT OF S Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:1.04 YB: Ph: # 6 ---------------------• MetroScan / King •---------------------_--_---------* Owner :Omega International Investment Corporati Parcel # :192104 9025 02 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :11/22/1999 Mail :16622 178th Ave NE Woodinville Wa 98072 Sale Price :$227,500 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$54,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 25 N 250 FT OF W Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.89 YB: Ph: # 7 *----------- -- MetroScan / King ----------------•-------•--------* Owner :Nelson John & Joellen Parcel # :192104 9026 01 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date / Mail :PO Box 3229 Federal Way Wa 98063 Sale Price v Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$44,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 26 BEG 412 FT S Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.90 YB: Ph: # 8 *---- ----- MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Pei-yi Corporation Parcel # :192104 9027 00 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :08/18/1989 Mail :246 SW 325th P1 Federal Way Wa 98023 Sale Price :$430,000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$259,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 27 POR GL 2 BEG Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:8.77 YB: Ph: # 9 --------------------- MetroScan / King --------------------------------* Owner :Crow Willard S Parcel # :192104 9028 09 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date Mail :3803 120th Ave SE Bellevue Wa 98006 Sale Price Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V ' :$100 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 28 S 30 FT OF N Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.19 YB: Ph:425-746-50%4 ltaformaiiotr compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. ~) 10 • *---------____-- MetroScan / King _ ___..________________..____-* 'Owner :Weisman Steven I Parcel # :192104 9031 04 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :05/22/5/22/1991 Mail :PO Box 16 King Cove Ak 99612 Sale Price :$122,500 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$54,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 31 S 162 FT OF N Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.65 YB: Ph: # 11 *--------------------- • MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Nelson John & Joellen Parcel # :192104 9032 03 Site :1530 SW 341st Pl Federal Way 98023 Sale Date Mail :PO Box 3229 Federal Way Wa 98063 Sale Price Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$98,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 32 S 162 FT OF N Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:960 Ac:.46 YB:-1938 Ph: # 12 *---------------------• MetroScan / King • ---------- --------------------* Owner :Federal Way Public Schools Parcel # :192104 9033 02 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :10/19/1984 Mail :31405 18th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$757,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 33 W 335.76 FT Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:9.82 YB: Ph: # 13 ---------------------. MetroScan / King -------------------------------* Owner :Klak Federal Way Llc Parcel # :192104 9043 00 Site :702 SW Campus Dr Federal Way Sale Date :10/11/2000 Mail :122 S Michigan Ave #1000 Chicago Il 60603 Sale Price :$850,000 Full Use :301 Vacant,Multi-family Asd.V :$588,900 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 43 POR OF GL-1 Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E /'--- Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:4.51 YB: Ph: # 14 *---------------------: MetroScan / King .----------------------------•------* Owner :City Of Federal Way Parcel # :192104 9050 00 Site :1100 NE Campus Pkwy Seattle 98105 Sale Date :09/25/1991 Mail :33530 lst Way S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$1,452,600 Use :301 Vacant,Multi-family Asd.V :$1,757,400 , Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 50 POR GL 1 STR Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:16.14 YB: Ph: # 15 --------------------- MetroScan / King : ---------------------------------* Owner :Fed Way School Dist #210 Parcel # :192104 9052 08 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :06/23/1994 Mail :31405 18th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$66,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 52 POR OF SW 1/4 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:1.34 YB: Ph: # 16 *--------------------- MetroScan / King : ----------------------------------* Owner :Fed Way School Dist #210 Parcel # :192104 9053 07 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date Mail :31405 18th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :000 *unknown Use Code* Asd.V :$31,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 53 POR OF SW 1/4 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:1.09 YB: Ph: # 17 ---------------------• MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Fortman William C/Katherine G Parcel # :242103 9051 03 Site :1605 SW 341st Pl Federal Way 98023 Sale Date :12/O1/1997 Mail :1605 SW 341st P1 Federal Way Wa 98023 Sale Price :$215,000 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$202,000 Lgl :STR 242103 TAXLOT 51 S 412 1/3 FT Stories:l B1dgSF:1,230 Q:NE S:24 Ac:2.50 YB:1949 T:21N R:03E Ph:253-661-0421 Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/1 / # 18 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Corporati :---_------------------------------* Parcel # :242103 9053 01 Owner :Omega International Investment Sale Date :11/22/1999 Site Mail :*no Site Address* Federal Way :16622 178th Ave NE Woodinville Wa 98072 Sale Price :$227,500 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$98,000 Lgl :STR 242103 TAXLOT 53 E 264 FT OF N Q:NE 5:24 T:21N R:03E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:1.89 YB: Ph: &rforntatdon compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or tivarranries as to the accuracy or Completeness of information contained in this report. MetroScan / King (VA)� Parcel # Owner Name Site Address YB Owner Phone 192104 9005 - +'Glen Park AssociatesLlc1002HSW Campus Dr Federal W 1989 1990 192104 9006 Campus Grove L1c;Born Lloy 33715 loth Ave SW Federal W 192104 9008 Klak Golf Llc 700 SW Campus Dr Federal Wa 192104 9019 Papke Daniel P/Susan D;+ *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9024 Nelson John & Jo Ellen *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9025 Omega International Invest *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9026 Nelson John & Joellen *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9027 Pei-yi Corporation *no *no Site Address* Site Address* Federal Federal W W 425-746-5074 192104 9028 Crow Willard S I *no Site Address* Federal-W 192104 192104 9031 9032 Weisman Steven Nelson John & Joellen 1530 SW 341st P1 Federal W-a 1938 192104 9033 Federal Way Public Schools *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9043 Klak Federal Way Llc 702 SW Campus Dr Federal Wa 192104 9050 City Of Federal Way 1100 NE Campus Pkwy Seattle 192104 9052 Fed Way School Dist #210 *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9053 Fed Way School Dist #210 *no Site Address* 341st P1 Federal Federal W Wa 1949 253-661-0421 242103 9051' Fortman William C/Katherin 1605 SW 242103 9053 Omega International Invest *no Site Address* Federal W W t) S �Gl"V !� formation compiled from var•iarrs sources. Real Estate SolutParrs nrakes no representations or warranties as to fim accuracy or completeness of infortnalion contained in this report. KING COUNTY DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS 03 ixa •av rc rn ixe w �Aa(RwY4aEMT KC 1689 NW 19-21-4 SCALE• I IOO' RECEIVED jUN 2 G 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. FEMA US ARMY CORPS/ENGINEERS TRAVIS NELSON REGION 10 NTH DIV ATTN REGULATORY BRANCH WDFW 130 228T" ST SW PO BOX 3755 19112 PIONEER WAY E BOTHELL WA 98021-9796 SEATTLE WA 98124 ORTING WA 98360 DEPT OF ECOLOGY WSDOT PUGET SOUND AIR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY PO BOX 47703 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE 110 UNION ST STE 500 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 PO BOX 47331 SEATTLE WA 98101-2038 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7331 CRAIG STONE JAMEY TAYLOR WA NATURAL HERITAGE AREA ADMINISTRATOR DNR SEPA CENTER DNR WSDOT SOUTH KING COUNTY PO BOX 47015 PO BOX 47014 PO BOX 330310 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7015 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7014 SEATTLE WA 98133-9710 OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & WA STATE DEPT WILDLIFE RANDY PEARSON HISTORIC PRESERVATION 600 CAPITOL WAY N WASH STATE PARKS PO BOX 48343 ' OLYMPIA WA 98501-1091 PO BOX 42668 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8343 OLYMPIA WA 98504-2668 GARY KRIEDT SEATTLE/KING COUNTY MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE KING COUNTY TRANSIT DIV DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH PLANNING DEPT ENV PLANNING MS KSC-TR-0431 1404 CENTRAL AVE S STE 101 39015 172ND AVE SE 201 S JACKSON ST KENT WA 98032 AUBURN WA 98002 SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 GERI WALKER LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST FWFD FWSD PO BOX 4249 31617 1ST AVE S 31405 18T" AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 PUYALLUP TRIBE FEDERAL WAY DISPOSAL AT&T CABLESTORE 2002 E 28T" ST PO BOX 1877 1414 324T" S TACOMA WA 98404 AUBURN WA 98071 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS CRAIG GIBSON RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES 2401 S 35T" ST 2401 S 35T" ST PO BOX 11007 TACOMA WA 98409-7460 TACOMA WA 98409-7460 TACOMA WA 98411 CITY OF TACOMA BLUS NE TAC NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL JOE ELTRICH LAND USE ADMINISTRATOR C/O JAMES COLBURN TACOMA WATER DIVISION 747 MARKET ST STE 345 TACOMA ECONOMIC DEV PO BOX 11007 TACOMA WA 98402-3769 747 MARKET ST RM 900 TACOMA WA 98411 TACOMA WA 98402-3793 CITY OF MILTON PAUL ALEXANDER MARY AUSBURN 1000 LAUREL ST METRO TRANSIT PSE MILTON WA 98354 201 S JACKSON ST MS KSCTR0413 6905 S 228T" ST SKC-SVC SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 KENT WA 98032 PAT PROUSE CHRIS CARREL JILL GASTON REALTY SPEC US WEST FRIENDS OF THE HYLEBOS BPA 450 110TH NE RM 409 PO BOX 24971 914 AVE "D" BELLEVUE WA 98004 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 SNOHOMISH WA 98290 BELLACARINO WOODS HOA 35204 6TH AVE SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 BRAD PLEMMONS 101 T ST SE AUBURN WA 98002 BARCLAY PLACE HOA 1034 SW 334TH FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 HARBOUR HOMES 1010 S 336TH ST STE 305 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 KING COUNTY DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS d; w KC 1689 NW 19-21-4 SCALE- I°=100' RECEIVED jUN 2 6 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. o 9-(,o 3 l S C l # 1, *--------------- -: MetroScan / King --------__-----------------* Owner :'Glen Park Associates Llc Parcel # :192104 9005 06 Site :1002 SW Campus Dr Federal Way Sale Date :07/27/2000 Mail :2150 N 107th St #370 Seattle Wa 98133 Sale Price :$31,686,000 Full Use :011 Res,Apartment Asd.V :$15,842,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 5 N 1/2 OF NW - Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 B1dgSF:274,063 Ac:16.82 YB:1989 Ph: # 2 ---------- MetroScan / Kin • -------------------------------* Owner :Campus Grove L1c;Born Lloyd W Parcel # :192104 9006 05 Site :33715 loth Ave SW Federal Way Sale Date :01/11/2000 Mail :PO Box 178 Bow Wa 98232 Sale Price . Use :011 Res,Apartment Asd.V :$6,968,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 6 POR GL 1 SEC Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 B1dgSF:149,534 Ac:6.86 YBf-1990 Ph: # 3 „^ - *_---------- MetroScan / King •---------- --------------------* Owner :Klak Golf Llc Parcel # :192104 9008 03 Site :700 SW Campus Dr Federal Way Sale Date :10/11/2000 Mail :122 S Michigan Ave #1000 Chicago I1 60603 Sale Price :$850,000 Use :301 Vacant,Multi-family Asd.V :$2,341,700 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 8 SE 1/4 OF NW Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:17.92 YB: Ph: # 4 *---------------------MetroScan / King • ------------------------------- Owner :Papke Daniel P/SusanD;+. Parcel # :192104 9019 00 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :07/03/2001 Mail :PO Box 3649 Federal Way Wa 98063 Sale Price :$160,000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$156,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 19 S 1/5 OF GL 2 Q:NW S:19• T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:4.53 YB: Ph: # 5 *---------------------. MetroScan / King • ------------------------------- Owner :Nelson John & Jo Ellen Parcel # :192104 9024 03 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :07/08/1986 Mail :PO Box 3229 Federal Way Wa 98063 Sale Price :$11,000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$46,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 24 W 160 FT OF S Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:1.04 YB: Ph: # 6 *---------------------: MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Omega International Investment Corporati Parcel # :192104 9025 02 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :11/22/1999 Mail :16622 178th Ave NE Woodinville Wa 98072 Sale Price :$227,500 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$54,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 25 N 250 FT OF W Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.89 YB: Ph: # 7 --------------------- MetroScan / King :------------------------------- 01 Owner :Nelson John & Joellen Parcel # :192104 9026 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date Mail :PO Box 3229 Federal Way Wa 98063 Sale Price Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$44,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 26 BEG 412 FT S Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.90 YB: Ph: # 8 *---------------------: MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* 00 Owner :Pei-yi Corporation Parcel # :192104 9027 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :08/18/1989 Mail :246 SW 325th Pl Federal Way Wa 98023 Sale Price :$430,000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$259,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 27 POR GL 2 BEG Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: /' / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:8.77 YB: Ph: r-* # 9 *--------------------- MetroScan / King •---*-------------------------- Parcel # :192104 9028 09 Owner :Crow Willard S Sale Date Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Mail :3803 120th Ave SE Bellevue Wa 98006 Sale Price Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$100 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 28 S 30 FT OF N Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Ph:425-746-5074 Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.19 YB: w Z y 61) Information compiled from various sources. (teal Estate Solutions makes no representations of information contained in this report. or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness r # 10 *- -- ~-' MetroScan / King Owner :Weisman Steven I Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Mail :PO Box 16 King Cove Ak 99612 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 31 S 162 FT OF N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 11 *-------------------- -= MetroScan / King Owner :Nelson John & Joellen Site :1530 SW 341st Pl Federal Way 98023 Mail :PO Box 3229 Federal Way Wa 98063 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 32 S 162 FT OF N Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l BidgSF:960 # 12 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Federal Way Public Schools Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Mail :31405 18th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 33 W 335.76 FT Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 13 *-------------------- MetroScan / King Owner :Klak Federal Way Llc Site :702 SW Campus Dr Federal Way Mail :122 S Michigan Ave #1000 Chicago Il 60603 Use :301 Vacant,Multi-family Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 43 POR OF GL-1 Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 14 *---------------------; MetroScan / King Owner :City Of Federal Way Site :1100 NE Campus Pkwy Seattle 98105 Mail :33530 1st Way S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :301 Vacant,Multi-family Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 50 POR GL 1 STR Bedrm: $th F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 15 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Fed Way School Dist #210 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Mail :31405 18th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 52 POR OF SW 1/4 Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 16 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Fed Way School Dist #210 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Mail :31405 18th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :000 *unknown Use Code* Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 53 POR OF SW 1/4 Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 17 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Fortman William C/Katherine G Site :1605 SW 341st Pl Federal Way 98023 Mail :1605 SW 341st P1 Federal Way Wa 98023 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :STR 242103 TAXLOT 51 S 412 1/3 FT Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/l / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,230 # 18 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Omega International Investment Corporati Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Mail :16622 178th Ave NE Woodinville Wa 98072 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Lgl :STR 242103 TAXLOT 53 E 264 FT OF N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: -------------------------- Parcel # :192104 9031 04 Sale Date :05/22/1991 Sale Price :$122,500 Full Asd.V :$54,000 Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:.65 YB: Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :192104 9032 03 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$98,000 Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:.46 YB:-1938 Ph: •---------- --------------------* Parcel # :192104 9033 02 Sale Date :10/19/1984 Sale Price Asd.V :$757,000 Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:9.82 YB: Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :192104 9043 00 Sale Date :10/11/2000 Sale Price :$850,000 Full Asd.V :$588,900 Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:4.51 YB: Ph: : -------------------------------* Parcel # :192104 9050 00 Sale Date :09/25/1991 Sale Price :$1,452,600 Asd.V :$1,757,400 Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:16.14 YB: Ph: ------------------------------- Parcel # :192104 9052 08 Sale Date :06/23/1994 Sale Price Asd.V :$66,000 Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:1.34 YB: Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :192104 9053 07 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$31,000 Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:1.09 YB: Ph: ------------------------------- Parcel # :242103 9051 03 Sale Date :12/01/1997 Sale Price :$215,000 Full Asd.V :$202,000 Q:NE S:24 T:21N R:03E Ac:2.50 YB:1949 Ph:253-661-0421 ------------------------------- Parcel # :242103 9053 01 Sale Date :11/22/1999 Sale Price :$227,500 Full Asd.V :$98,000 Q:NE S:24 T:21N R:03E Ac:1.89 YB: Ph: lntfonnation compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or ivarrattties as to the accuracy or completeness of it:formation contained in this report. MetroScan / King (WA) Parcel # Owner Name - Site Address - YBOwner Phone - 192104 r 9005 wr Glen Park Associates Llc 1002SW Campus Dr Federal W 1989 192104 9006 Campus Grove L1c;Born Lloy 33715 10th Ave SW Federal W 1990 192104 9008 Klak Golf Llc 700 SW Campus Dr Federal Wa 192104 9019 Papke Daniel P/Susan D;+ *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9024 Nelson John & Jo Ellen *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9025 Omega International Invest *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9026 Nelson John & Joellen *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9027 Pei-yi Corporation *no Site Address* Federal W 425-746-5074 192104 9028 Crow Willard S *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9031 Weisman Steven I *no Site Address* Federal-W 192104 9032 Nelson John & Joellen 1530 SW 341st PI Federal W-a 1938 192104 9033 Federal Way Public Schools *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9043 Klak Federal Way Llc 702 SW Campus Dr Federal Wa 192104 9050 City Of Federal Way 1100 NE Campus Pkwy Seattle 192104 9052 Fed Way School Dist #210 *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9053 Fed Way School Dist #210 *no Site Address* Federal W 1949 253-661-0421 242103 9051 Fortman William C/Katherin 1605 SW 341st Pl Federal Wa 242103 9053 Omega International Invest *no Site Address* Federal W W t) S �Gt'� Information con+plfed from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or varrapities as to the accuracy or completeness of 1,tformation contained in this report. CITY OF -=-f Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-661-4000; Fax 253-661-4129 www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, tha A- Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed Ae-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2003. Project Name File Number(s) Signature � r Date 9 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 8/1 /2003 1:18 PM CITY OF MEMORANDUM Federal Way Community Development Services Department NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: Wynstone Preliminary Plat Description: Proposal to subdivide two existing parcels comprised of an approximately 13.49 acre site into 48 separate residential lots. Four of the proposed lots are proposed to retain multi -family zoning, while the remaining 44 lots are proposed for single-family residential use. The project includes constructing stree improvements, storm drainage facilities, and utility improvements. The applicant has also requested a revision to the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement applicable to a portion of the site. Applicant: Brad Plemmons Location: Between Campus Drive and the northern terminus of 12t' Avenue. SW, north of Sherwood Forest Elementary School and north of the plat of Orchid Lane. The proposed project also abuts the east side of Saghalie Park. Date Application Received: June 26, 2003 Date of Notice of Application: September 13, 2003 Date Determined Complete: September 10, 2003 Permits Required by this Application: 1. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (File #03-102631-00-SE) 2. Preliminary Plat (File #03-102630-00-SU) 3. Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment (File #03-102632-00-UP) Existing Environmental Documents: Stormwater Drainage Technical Information Report, Wetland Assessment, Traffic Impact Analysis, School Access Analysis Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: X YES NO Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy"_ (SEPA); FWCC Chapter 19, "Planning and Development"; FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; FWCC Chapter 21, "Surface and Stormwater Management"; and FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning" Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations including the FWCC; King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by the City of Federal Way, and King County Road Standards as amended by the City. Any person may submit written comments on the Notice of Land use Application to the liirecwr W w111111u111Ly Development Services by September 29, 2003. The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (address below). Any person has the right to submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner and appear at the public hearing of the Hearing Examiner to give comments orally. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 15 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may challenge the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner. Contact: Jim Harris, Senior Planner, 253-661-4019 City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Published in The Federal Way Mirror: September 13, 2003 Doc ID 424554 From: Tina Piety To: admin@fedwaymirror.com Date: 9/11/03 8:47AM Subject: Legal Notices Please publish the attached legal notices (Brighton NOA, 03-103182-00-SE, & Wynstone NOA, 03-102631-00-SE) in Saturday's (9/13/03) issue. Please furnish an affidavit of publication. Thank you. CC: dgrigg@soundpublishing.com TACOMA WATER 3628 South 35th Street Tacoma, Washington 98409-3192 TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES September 26, 2003 Mr. Jim Harris, Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South Federal Way WA 98003 cokfu RECEIVED BY UNITY r1�.VE7LO VENT r7FPAPTMFNT Subject: PRELIMINARY PLAT - WYNSTONE Location: Between Campus Drive and the northern terminus of 12th Ave SW North of Sherwood Forest Elementary School and north of the plat of Orchid Lane. Also abuts the ease side of Saghalie Park Dear Mr. Harris: We have reviewed the above subject and find that this is not in Tacoma Water's service area. Sincerel , Grant Whitley Utility Services Specialist :A�FCiry OF CITY HALL , Federal Way Feder 1 st Way South • Box 9718 ederal Way, WA 98063-9-9718 (253) 661-4000 www. cityoffederalway. com July 16, 2003 ft Mr. Brad Plemmons FdLE 101 T Street SE Auburn, WA 98002 Re: File No's. 03-102631-00-SE, 03-102630-00-SU, & 03-102632-00-UP NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION; Wynstone Preliminary Plat Application Dear Mr. Plemmons: The Department of Community Development Services received your revised application on June 26, 2003, for the Wynstone Preliminary Plat, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment revision. Upon receipt of the applications, City staff reviewed the submittal packet for completeness based on the submittal requirements for a preliminary plat, amendment to the Concomitant Zoning Agreement, and SEPA. During the course of the City's review, the following items were found to be missing from the application packet and must be submitted to the City for review. A. Preliminary Storm Drainage Technical Information Report (TIR). See the February 21, 2003, preapplication comments from Kim Scattarella, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer. Please submit four copies of the TIR. B. Written request for amendment to the Concomitant Zoning Agreement (CZA). The base fee for the CZA was submitted; however, no written request for the amendment was submitted. The written request must identify provisions of the CZA that you are requesting to have modified and/or repealed. In developing your written request for this amendment, in addition to reviewing and considering the discussion in my March 4, 2003, preapplication memo regarding the concomitant provisions, you should also consider and include density, design, and performance standards for future development on Lots 45 — 48, as these are identified as future multi -development parcels. The CZA and associated amendments currently in effect identify at a minimum density, design, and performance standards for multi -family development on the site. Given the standards in the current CZA and amendment, City staff suggests inclusion of density, design, and performance standards for any future multi -family development on the site. It would be helpful for City staff to met with you prior to developing your written request, so we could go through the existing CZA and amendment section by section, and determine which portions would be appropriate to modify. Contact me by phone to arrange a meeting time if you think this would be helpful. Mr. Brad Plemmons Page 2 July 16, 2003 In order for your application to be considered complete and ready for processing, the missing items identified above must be submitted. After receipt of the requested information, the Department will notify you within 14 days whether your application is considered complete, or what, if any, information is still needed. A notice of application will be issued following determination of project completeness. Please be advised that a technical review of the submitted information has not been conducted. A complete technical review of the submitted applications and supporting materials will be conducted following determination'of a complete application. The technical review will likely result in request for additional information and revisions to the plans. As revisions to the plans are submitted, additional review may identify further revisions to the plans to meet applicable codes and regulations. Please be advised that if the additional information requested above is not submitted within 180 days of the date of this letter, then the pending applications will expire. Contact me at 253 661-4019 or iim.harris ci offederalwa .com if you have any questions or need any assistance. Sincerely, �1Lr� Harris Senior Planner enc: Resubmittal Information Form c: Kim Scattarella, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst File #03-10263 1-00-SE Doc I.D. 23929 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 26, 2003 TO: Jim Femling, Development Services Manager (2 copies) Mary Kate Martin, Building Official Mary Young, Lakehaven Utility District Greg Brozek, Federal Way Fire Department Geri Walker, Federal Way School District Jennifer Schroder, PARCS FROM: Jim Harris FOR DRC MTG. ON: July 10, 2003 FILE NUMBER(s): 03-102631-00-SE 03-102630-00-SU 03-102632-00-UP PROJECT NAME: WYNSTONE PRELIINARY PLAT PROJECT ADDRESS: *NO SITE ADDRESS* ZONING DISTRICT: RS 7.2 and RM 1800* PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Review of proposed subdivision to divide 2 existing lots into 44 single family lots & 4 multi -family lots. Project includes request to amend existing concomitant zoning agreement that pertains to one of the subject lots. LAND USE PERMITS: Preliminary Plat, SEPA, Process V to amend concomitant zoning agreement. PROJECT CONTACT: BRAD PLEMMONS 101 T ST SE, Auburn, WA 253 939-1961 MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Preliminary Plat Map Preliminary Road, Drainage and Utility Plan Preliminary Grading Plan Existing Tree Plan Preliminary Landscape Plan 2 Certificates of Applicant Status FW Schools Letter, May 21, 2003 SEPA Checklist Habitat Technologies Report dated April 8, 2003 TIA, by Chris Brown, dated May 21, 2002 Water and Sewer Availability Certificates Letter from FW Parks Director, dated April 3, 2003 Envelopes for public Notice Title Report, two copies *All of the above information was submitted. I did not route copies of all the materials to each DRC member. If there is any application information listed that you would like and did not receive, let me know and I will get you a copy. 31405 18th Ave. So. Federal Way, WA 98003-5433 Tel 253.945.2000 www.fwsd.wednet.edu May 21, 2003 Jim Harris City of Federal Way 33530 1 st W ay South P O Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98003 RE: Wynstone Preiiminary Plat Dear Ms. Harris, '�� Federal Nay Public Schools • Evx;ry Snidear, a ftuidrr RECEIVED JUN 2 6 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. Mr., Brad Plemmons met with staff from the school district today to discuss the conceptual drawings of the Wynstone preliminary plat. Rick LaBoyne, Safety Officer, Cindy Wendland, Assistant Director of Transportation, and I met with Mr. Plemmons. This proposed plat is currently in the Silver Lake Elementary, Saghalie Junior High and Decatur High School service areas. With the development of this plat and Orchid Lane to the south it appears that access to Sherwood Forest Elementary along 12th Ave SW would be available. An elementary boundary committee is expected to convene during the 2003/04 school year. At that time, we could introduce some discussion to changing this area to include it in the Sherwood Forest service area. This would become a walking area to Sherwood Forest Elementary and Saghalie Middle School. High school students would attend Decatur and appropriate bus stops would be placed when necessary. We provided Mr. Plemmons with the School Access Analysis guidelines. It appears that sidewalks will be available on both sides of 12th Ave SW to the connection with Orchid Lane. From Orchid Lane south, sidewalks will only be available on the west side 121' Ave SW. Students walking to Sherwood Forest would be required to cross 12st' Ave SW at the intersection of SW 339th St and 12"' PL SW in the proposed plat. We anticipate that as 12t1' Ave SW is connected to the south at SW 344"' ST, traffic along this roadway will increase dramatically. For this reason, we propose that this intersection be developed as a four way stop with marked crosswalks. %,Ir. Plemmons inquired about any guidelines the District may have about the percent of graoe where school children walk to school. Currently, the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction does not provide us with any restrictions for walking paths along steep grades. School buses would likely not be routed along this roadway with a steep grade. Mr. Plemmons indicated that some traffic calming measures are being considered along SW 3391h ST. The connection of this roadway to 19th will increase traffic adjacent to Saghalie Middle School. We can support traffic calming measures along this roadway to help mitigate the introduction of westbound traffic along SW 339"' ST that will affect school buses turning left onto the bus loop at Saghalie. We would also like the City to consider making SW 3391`' a no parking zone. Many parents drive their students to school. If cars queue up along SW 3391" to drop off or pick up students this will increase congestion along the roadway that could hamper school bus access. The most recent Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan indicates a student yield of .6644 from new single-family housing. This development could add 29 to 30 new students. These are averages only; the actual number of students may vary. This may create a need for additional space, equipment and staff. This impact is mitigated in part by the collection of impact fees. The District appreciates the opportunity to comment on this proposed development and reserves the right for further comment as additional information becomes available. Sincerely, J nn pp Geri Walker Enrollment and Boundary Analyst C: Sally McLean, Chief Financial Officer Rick LaBoyne, Safety Officer Cindy Wendland, Assistant Director Transportation School Principals Brad Plemmons, President Brad Plemmons Enterprises Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department FWC 20-155 Check List -- _ -_.--------- _ . . Proposed Development Name: Wynstone Preliminary Plat Date Reviewed by PRCS Director: July 10, 2003 .............................. . Adopted` Parks Level of Service: 1.0.9 acresll000 pop ua>E.:.;.;., . . 2003 City of Federal Way Population: 83,850 Total Park Land to date: 845 acres Current Level of Service of park land/1000 population: 10.1-acres/1000 population Total Park Land short of adopted LOS: 69 acres Development type; Subdivision Plat location: Park Planning Area Projected located within: C Plat Size: 13.49 acres Total lots: 44 Impact to population: 2.95 (household size) x 44(lots) = 129.8 Proposed Plat Open Space Categoiry. % of Gross Land Usable Conservation 16,444 SF _ Trail 2338 SF Total: 18,782 SF ......... ...------- t]nrc I h P nrnnowd.wt aside anen %ranee meet 15°/=, of gross land oer FWC 20-155? No: 13.49acres x 43560sf = 587,624 total sf The proposed 18,782 sf is .03% of gross land - ----------------- --- ----------- Park Planning Area C Current Park Inventory and proximity from subdivision BPA trail phase III 1 mile trail < 1/2 mile Sa halie Park 16.14 acres Communi k <1/2 mile Coronado Park 1.2 acres Neighborhood pk >1 mile Kenwood property 6 acres Undeveloped > 1/2 mile Alderdale Park 2.0 acres Neighborhood pk >1/2 mile ......... . ....... Park type.service area guidelines: ------------- Nei hborhood Park Service area 1 park per 1/2 mile radius Community Park Service area Open Space Service area 1 park per 1- 1 1/2 mile radius 6.0 acres per 1000/ o ulation 1 Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department FWC 20-155 Check List F-indin s: Analysis:.far deteraiziniiig;r-egpired open space. 1. Impact for additional parkland: Using the Official Financial Management standard for population per household (2.95), the proposed plat of 44 units will generate on the average 130 residents. Appling the City's adopted standard of 10.9 acres per 1000/population or .0109 acres per person, the total of additional acres needed to maintain this standard is 1.42. acres. 2. Impact to parks stem: City of Federal Way's Council adopted park system consists of Neighborhood, Community and Open Space parks. a. Neighborhood Parks range from 2 — 7 acres and serve approximately'/z mile radius. There are no neighborhood parks with in a'/2 mile radius of the proposed subdivision. b. Community Parks range from 15 — 25 acres and serve approximately 1-2 mile radius. The proposed subdivision is adjacent to Saghalie Community Park. c. Open Space Parks land is made up of, or in entirety, one of the following: heavily wooded areas, stream and creek corridors, steep hillsides, wetlands, wildlife habitat or other environmentally sensitive land. The park plan recommends a standard of 6.2 acres per 1000 population. Park Planning Area "C" has no inventory of designated open space park land. Based on a population analysis of each of the parks planning areas, conducted by City's GIS for 2002, area "C" estimated population was 8,970. Using the recommended standard of 6.2 acres of open space land/1000 population, the demand for open space for this planning area, based on 2002 information comes to 56 acres. This planning area is deficient in public open sace park land. ;MM:», :_ onclusion; ; - Based on the above analysis, there will be an impact to the demand for park for neighborhood parksandopen space. The proposed plat shows 18,782 SF in open space area in three separate tracts (Tracts F, G and H). Per the subdivision code 15% of the total gross area is to be placed in open space. The preliminary plat as shown has approximately .03%%, this is not acceptable. Per the code the Parks Director can make administrative alternation of the percentage requirements and the applicant can request a fee in lieu payment. It is my understanding the applicant prefers to make up the difference through the fee -in -lieu option. Based on the above analysis I would accept fee -in -lieu. 2 Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department FWC 20-155 Check List / I LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTC dCT 316271st Avenue South ♦ P. O. Box 4249 ♦ Federal Way, WA 98063 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA OF: July 10, 2003 ATTN: Mr. Jim Harris Senior Planner SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 7 - Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03-102630-00-SU/03-102631-00-SE/03-102632-00-UP COMMENTS: A developer extension agreement will be required to extend mainline water and sewer facilities to serve the site. Owner should apply separately to the District for this process as soon as possible to avoid delays in construction. Please allow 3 to 4 months for plan review and approval. SEPA: Construction activities have not been described as required in Section 16.b of the checklist. Construction of twelve -inch (12") water main should be addressed specifically. Date: Mary . Youpg U Devel pmeni Services Sulaervisor Direct Line: (253) 946-5400 FAX: (253) 529-4081 E-mail: myoung@lakehaven.org .1 Certification of Applicant Status Tax Parcel #192104-9044-09 JUN 2 6 2003 CI y OF FEDERqL ►NAY BUILDING DSPT. I, Brad Plemmons, hereby authorize that I am a certified agent of Brad Plemmons Enterprises, Inc., a corporation authorized to do business in the state of Washington, which is the subject of this application for platting process in City of Federal Way, WA per my purchase and sales agreement. This business associate is not the owner of the property, I certify that this business association is authorized to apply for the platting process in City of Federal Way, WA per my purchase and sales agreement by any and all other owners of the property. The mailing address of this business is 101 T Street SE, Auburn, WA 98002. I further certify that the above -named business association is the "applicant" for this platting process in City of Federal Way, WA per my purchase and sales agreement and is financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This association shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this platting process in City of Federal Way, WA per my purchase and sales agreement unless it changes it's "applicant" status in writing. I certify under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington, that the foregoing is true and correct. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me Werner K. Paulus, to be known as the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein stated. Given under my hand and official seal this day of , 2003. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me , to known as the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein stated. Given under my hand and official seal this day of , 2003. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at POLYGON MNGMT INC ZOSQ._ _ 06M/0 13:50 5 :03/03 NO:845 NO1'1C1? Or IN'1'Ii1l:1:S"1' 1N rROPER'IN TO: The City or rccleral Way From: Polygon Shelter, Inc. and Wcrncr K. Paulus 11urstiant to II►c tent►~ of the ltc:11 listatc l'urcltaxe and Sale Agreement, dated Nuvcutbcr 1, 2002, between Wcrncr K. Paulw%- atLLIUYl on Shelter Inc_-("Scl{cr') and Brad and Kathy 111c► inions ("Purchaser") for (lie real pfoperty commonly known as Campus Crest in (lie City of Federal Way consisting of ahproximale1y 5.01 acres-rAgrcement"} Purchaser has the authority, pursuant to Sections 6 and 7.5 of the Agreement, 1a apply for and pursue permits and oilier approvals that will allow Purchaser to develop andconstruct a residential project on the Property rullowinb Ilic close of the safes Iransactitt'n. DATED this 1S! clay orAme, 2003. STATE OF WASHIN(i-ohl ) ) ss. COUNTY or SKAcsrr ) On June 19, 2003. before Me, Dorothy A Grossl;h1W personally argxwcd Werner K. Paulus,- perst+nally-knout► to nic (or proved to me on the basis vt'satkfactory svuieac4to.he-thc- person whose nurnt is subscribed its the within instrument and acknowledged to nie that he exccrrtcd the sable in his aulhonoed eapaeny, and that by his signature on the instrument die lxrwn, or the entity upon Ixhall' of which the pCrtrtn jWd_ executed the instrument. SE.1.I.I?R Ol. 11tOP -WT-FMEIt K. T 4. ULUS, a married man as to his solo and sepal ate property 1101.Y(;QN SI IFI.TFINI Tashingfrill WITNESS rrty hand and oiYeial seal. -By- lr Dorothy A. COW81= W-cntcr K. Paulus, i Notary Public in and for the Stale u[a<hingtolt �" '► A•-t3R � Residing in Skagit County l� Alt+ My Costutussion Exprrc%: April 2'J.-=4 i �;' S �1 •'•.�• I`. cc: Matthew Balknlan (via facsimile 425--739-U47)- Brad and Kathy Plemmons, 101 'I'Strect, Auburn, WA 98002-5744 Bruce Goldstein, Colliers Internat'I, 1102 Coninicrec St., Ste 300, Tacoma, WA 98402 t -1LI:(iALV ►1_I:NUIytS\2WiU ilcstn2p211\ihkWC►1 I('I: Of- IN•11 JUIN V IN PItl1PFIVI Y dui Please forward this FAX to the named individual immediately! ,-) pacc x T,--- FAA22" §� CITY OF Federal Way APPLICATION NO(S) 3 1,F-,R LAND USE APPLICATION N&F COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33530 First Way South jUN 2 6 2oo3 PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-661-4000; Fax 253-661-4129 CITY OF FEDl=qL WAY BUILDING D "^'^"-!ynffPr�PralSxavrnm Ear, Date Project Name C_-�N '' "F Lc� - Property Address/Location �j C Parcel Number(s) Project Description Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Directors Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use _ Short Subdivisio�ro e A Subdivision Q Y Variance: Co niercial/Residential Required Information 9M "I 0 honing Designation f Comprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements Uniform Building Code (UBC): Occupancy Type + Construction Type Applicant Name: -OR74t _P V1K4 M O AJ S, Address: 161 -'sue SX. City/State: r i•� I��'• Zip: 67 FCC Phone: 9,-, (; aV�/ Y 3 q 1. co" Fax: as^,3 `73 i ((70 a Email: 3o--PletvLi,,Lr, 0_4 Si Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: ' Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Bulletin #003 — March 3, 2003 Page I of I k:\Handouts — Revised\Master Land Use Application 0 w X CHICAGO TITL _, JSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #1800, SEATTLE, WA 98104 PHONE: (206)628-5610 FAX: (206)628-9717 ORDER NO: 001065302 YOUR NO: CAMPUS CREST/PAULUS/PLEMMONS LOAN NO: RECEIVED JUN 2 6 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL COM m i-rMENT '1-Y OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. O R D E R R E F E R E N C E I N F O R M A T I O N SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER 1 OF THE SECOND COMMITMENT SELLER: WERNER K. PAULUS, AND POLYGON SHELTER, INC. PURCHASER/BORROWER: BRAD PLEMMONS AND KATHY PLEMMONS, HUSBAND AND WIFE LOAN NUMBER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: Our Title Commitment dated 05/14/03 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as follows: THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS ORDER. THE NEW EFFECTIVE DATE FOR THE PRELIMINARY COMMITMENT ON THIS PROPERTY IS JUNE 12, 2003. Y JUNE 17, 2003 AUTHORIZED BY: DAVID P. CAMP13ELL SUPPLCOM/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #1800, SEATTLE, WA 98104 Order No.: 001065302 PROPERTY ADDRESS: Your No.: CAMPUS CREST/PAULUS/PLEMMONS BRAD PLEMMONS & KATHY PLEMMONS 101 T STREET S.E. AUBURN, WASHINGTON 98002 ATTN: 1/0 Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. TITLE UNIT 6 TELEPHONE: (206) 628-5610 TOLL FREE: (800) 627-0530 FAX: (206) 628-9717 DARYL SAVIDIS SENIOR TITLE OFFICER AND UNIT MANAGER (E-MAIL: SAVIDISD@(-=.COM) BARBARA WAGNER SENIOR TITLE OFFICER (E-MAIL: WAGNERB@CZT.COM) DAVID P. CAMPBELL SENIOR TITLE OFFICER (E-MAIL: CAMPBELLDA@CTT.COM) LAURA MOES ASSISTANT TITLE OFFICER (E-MAIL: MOESL@CIT.COM) nTLEr12/RDA/0999 M N c N Z n ra «e w inen . nw KC 1689 z. KING COUNTY '°"""'"' NW 19 — 2 — 4 v-e-es DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS SCALE, I" -IOW y ■ W 5 4 1 k SW CAMPUS OH eino u �� f■ r �0 y�Y 8 �L»iu O 1 1 1- t a�'d9'tr� ` "-S MA � ti �n es a� . � ' ■ J'6 1 S � r I / �Lf uW c ','• u I S _ _ _ D� ►� 'arm " es` .. +ry.we P 411 4 Ss • .y v aocy.,r .nun-x. 3a z •` :Av ' se . � ,�/F �R c, - laf �YVa� p� • �� a?ice � f 7x i '�� � �i � 46 7 .--�� - rl • �� •:t r n� 4 r-... Ufa � ... ' SW 19 -9 o"W p0 qw,++'� f RECEIVED JUN 2 6 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. 03 J V # 1 *----------------- r- MetroScan / King :-�--------------------------* Owner :Glen Park Associates Llc Parcel # :192104 9005 06 Site :1002 SW Campus Dr Federal Way Sale Date :07/27/2000 Mail :2150 N 107th St #370 Seattle Wa 98133 Sale Price :$31,686,000 Full Use :011 Res,Apartment Asd.V :$15,842,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 5 N 1/2 OF NW Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 B1dgSF:274,063 Ac:16.82 YB:1989 Ph: # 2 *---------------------: MetroScan / King : ------ .__.___-----_-___--__-_--__* Owner :Campus Grove L1c;Born Lloyd W Parcel # :192104 9006 05 Site :33715 10th Ave SW Federal Way Sale Date :01/11/2000 Mail :PO Box 178 Bow Wa 98232 Sale Price Use :011 Res,Apartment Asd.V :$6,968,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 6 POR GL 1 SEC Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 B1dgSF:149,534 Ac:6.86 YB:1990 Ph: # 3 *--------------------- MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Klak Golf Llc Parcel # :192104 9008 03 Site :700 SW Campus Dr Federal Way Sale Date :10/11/2000 Mail :122 S Michigan Ave #1000 Chicago Il 60603 Sale Price :$850,000 Use :301 Vacant,Multi-family Asd.V :$2,341,700 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 8 SE 1/4 OF NW Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:17.92 YB: Ph: # 4 *--------------------- MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Papke Daniel P/Susan D;+ Parcel # :192104 9019 00 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :07/03/2001 Mail :PO Box 3649 Federal Way Wa 98063 Sale Price :$160,000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$156,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 19 S 1/5 OF GL 2 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:4.53 YB: Ph: # 5 *--------------------- MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Nelson John & Jo Ellen Parcel # :192104 9024 03 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :07/08/1986 Mail :PO Box 3229 Federal Way Wa 98063 Sale Price :$11,000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$46,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 24 W 160 FT OF S Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:1.04 YB: Ph: # 6 ---------------------• MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Omega International Investment Corporati Parcel # :192104 9025 02 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :11/22/1999 Mail :16622 178th Ave NE Woodinville Wa 98072 Sale Price :$227,500 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$54,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 25 N 250 FT OF W Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.89 YB: Ph: # 7 *----------------------: MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Nelson John & Joellen Parcel # :192104 9026 01 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date Mail :PO Box 3229 Federal Way Wa 98063 Sale Price Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$44,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 26 BEG 412 FT S Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.90 YB: Ph: # 8 *--------------------- MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Pei-yi Corporation Parcel # :192104 9027 00 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :08/18/1989 Mail :246 SW 325th Pl Federal Way Wa 98023 Sale Price :$430,000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$259,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 27 POR GL 2 BEG Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:8.77 YB: Ph: # 9 *--------------------- MetroScan / King : --------------------------------* Owner :Crow Willard S Parcel # :192104 9028 09 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date Mail :3803 120th Ave SE Bellevue Wa 98006 Sale Price Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$100 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 28 S 30 FT OF N Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.19 YB: Ph:425-746-5079 0-� -, W V t-) 3, tv�-� Information compiled from variour sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. i. # 10 *_______________ �- MetroScan / King Owner Weisman Steven I Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Mail :PO Box 16 King Cove Ak 99612 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 31 S 162 FT OF N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 11 *--------------------- ' MetroScan / King Owner :Nelson John & Joellen Site :1530 SW 341st Pl Federal Way 98023 Mail :PO Box 3229 Federal Way Wa 98063 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 32 S 162 FT OF N Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:960 # 12 *-------- - MetroScan / King Owner :Federal Way Public Schools Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Mail :31405 18th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 33 W 335.76 FT Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 13 *----------------- - MetroScan / King Owner :Klak Federal Way Llc Site :702 SW Campus Dr Federal Way Mail :122 S Michigan Ave #1000 Chicago Il 60603 Use :301 Vacant,Multi-family Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 43 POR OF GL-1 Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 14 *-------------------- MetroScan / King Owner :City Of Federal Way Site :1100 NE Campus Pkwy Seattle 98105 Mail :33530 1st Way S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :301 Vacant,Multi-family Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 50 POR GL 1 STR Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 15 *---------------------• MetroScan / King Owner :Fed Way School Dist #210 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Mail :31405 18th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 52 POR OF SW 1/4 Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 16 *--------------------- ' MetroScan / King Owner :Fed Way School Dist #210 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Mail :31405 18th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :000 *unknown Use Code* Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 53 POR OF SW 1/4 Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 17 *---------------------' MetroScan / King Owner :Fortman William C/Katherine G Site :1605 SW 341st Pl Federal Way 98023 Mail :1605 SW 341st Pl Federal Way Wa 98023 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :STR 242103 TAXLOT 51 S 412 1/3 FT Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,230 # 18 *-------------------- MetroScan / King Owner :Omega International Investment Corporati Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Mail :16622 178th Ave NE Woodinville Wa 98072 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Lgl :STR 242103 TAXLOT 53 E 264 FT OF N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: :--�)--------------------------* Parcel # :192104 9031 04 Sale Date :05/22/1991 Sale Price :$122,500 Full Asd.V :$54,000 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:.65 YB: Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :192104 9032 03 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$98,000 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:.46 YB:1938 Ph: ------------------------------- Parcel # :192104 9033 02 Sale Date :10/19/1984 Sale Price Asd.V :$757,000 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:9.82 YB: Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :192104 9043 00 Sale Date :10/11/2000 Sale Price :$850,000 Full Asd.V :$588,900 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:4.51 YB: Ph: ------------------------------- Parcel # :192104 9050 00 Sale Date :09/25/1991 Sale Price :$1,452,600 Asd.V :$1,757,400 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:16.14 YB: Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :192104 9052 08 Sale Date :06/23/1994 Sale Price Asd.V :$66,000 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:1.34 YB: Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :192104 9053 07 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$31,000 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:1.09 YB: Ph: ------------------------------- Parcel # :242103 9051 03 Sale Date :12/01/1997 Sale Price :$215,000 Full Asd.V :$202,000 Q:NE 5:24 T:21N R:03E Ac:2.50 YB:1949 Ph:253-661-0421 •-------------------------------* Parcel # :242103 9053 01 Sale Date :11/22/1999 Sale Price :$227,500 Full Asd.V :$98,000 Q:NE 5:24 T:21N R:03E Ac:1.89 YB: Ph: Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. MetroScan / King (WA) � c Parcel # Owner Name Site Address ^DrTFederal _YB Owner Phone 192104 9005 rrY`: GlenParkAssociatesLlc� 1002 SW`Campus W 1989 1990 192104 9006 Campus Grove L1c;Born Lloy 33715 loth Ave SW Federal W 192104 9008 Klak Golf Llc 700 SW Campus Dr Federal Wa 192104 9019 Papke Daniel P/Susan D;+ *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9024 Nelson John & Jo Ellen *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9025 Omega International Invest *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9026 Nelson John & Joellen *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9027 Pei-yi Corporation *no *no Site Address* Address* Federal Federal W W 425-746-5074 192104 9028 Crow Willard S *no Site Site Address* Federal W 192104 192104 9031 9032 Weisman Steven I Nelson John & Joellen 1530 SW 341st P1 Federal Wa 1938 192104 9033 Federal Way Public Schools *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9043 Klak Federal Way Llc 702 SW Campus Dr Federal Wa 192104 9050 City Of Federal Way 1100 NE Campus Pkwy Seattle 192104 9052 Fed Way School Dist #210 *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9053 Fed Way School Dist #210 *no Site Address* PI Federal Federal W Wa 1949 253-661-0421 242103 9051 Fortman William C/Katherin 1605 SW 341st 242103 9053 Omega International Invest *no Site Address* Federal W W p S Infornnation co, piled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions "lakes no representattons or tivarronties as to the accuracy or canpleteness of tnfor+uation contained in this report. COMMITMENT FOR TITLE EVSURANCE RECEIVED JUN 2 6 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefore; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Exclusions from Coverage (appearing herein) and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. In Witness Whereof, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed as of the date of policy shown in Schedule A, the policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorized signatory. Issued by: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SUITE 1800 701 5TH AVENUE SEATTLE, WA 98104 (206) 628-5666 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BY* ((gw mp'�' 1, preswent By: ATTEST 0-6 &fs—a-y Form C 9800 (Reprinted 09M) -Aollod slyl <q paansui lsaxalui xo alelse ay; xol amen pled pey luew!elo pe. ! ayl 1! pou!elsns uaaq aney ldu pinom g31L, 6ewep xo ssol u! 6uwllnsax (a) xo !A311od to ale(] of luenbesgns paleaxo xo 6u!yoplle (p) 'lueux!plo paansui ayl of a6Ewep xo ssol ou u! 6u!llnsax (o) 'Ao!lod s!yl xapun paansui up emoag luew!elo paansui ay} alpp eqj of xo!xd lupux!elo paansu! ayl Aq Auedwo0 ay} of 6u!lunn ui pasolos!p lou pup lueux!elo paansu! ay} of umouN Jnq 'A3110d 10 aJea le spxooax o!lgnd ayl u! pepxooax Jou 'Auedwoo ay} of umouN Jou (q) 'Juew!elo paansu! ayl Aq of pee16e xo pawnsse 'pejejjns 'palpaxo (e) :sxaJJew xaylo xo Swlelo asaanpe `seoupxgwnoue 'sua!l `sloolaa g •ebpelmouM lnoyl!m enlpn xol xaspyoxnd a to sly6!x ay; uo 6ulpulq eq pinom yolgm Ao!Iod to ale(] of xo!xd penn000 sey yolgM 6UI�PJ Aue 86pxan00 woe} bu!pnloxe Jou lnq 'Ao!Iod to eleQ le spxooax o!lgnd ayl ui pepxooax uaaq spy Loaxagj as!oxaxe ay} to ao!lou sselun ulewop Juaulwe to s1011d z -Ao!lod to ale(] Je spxooax o!lgnd ay} ui pepxooax uaaq sey puel ayJ 6u1109118 uolleloln p96911p xo uolleloln a woxl 6u!llnsax eoueagwnoue xo ua!l `loalap p 10 ao!lou a xo loaxayl es!oxaxe eql to eo!lou a 1pyl luelxe eql of ldaoxa 'anoge (e) Aq papnloxa lou ismod so!lod Ipluewuxano6 Auy (q) '4011od to ale(] le spxooax o!lgnd ay} ui pepxooax uaaq sey pupl ayl 6w10911e uolJeloln p86811e xo uolleloln p woxl 6u!llnsax eouexgwnoue xo ua!I 'Joelep a to so!lou a xo loaxayl luawaoxolue eqj to ao!lou a leyl lualxe ay} of ldeoxe 'suo!L -pinbei Ieluawuxano6 xo S80ULIUlpxo 'Snnpl asayl 10 uolleloln Aue to belle ayl xo 'uo!looloxd leluawuox!nua (n!) 10 'lied a seen xo si puul eqj yoigm to laoxpd Aue xo puel ay} to eaxe xo suo!suaw!p ayl ui a6ueyo a xo d!ysxaumo ui uollexpdes p (!!!) 'puel ay; uo paloaxO xal}eaxay xo nnou luawanoxdw! Aup 10 uo!leool xo Suo!suaux!p 'xaloexeyo ayl (!!) ''pupl ay} to JuewAofue xo 'esn 'Aouedn000 ay} (!) of bu!lplax xo 6u!L!q!yoxd `bullpin6ax `6ulloulsax (suo!lpin6ax xo 'seoueu!pxo 'smul 6u!uoz pue 6u!pl!nq of pel!wil lou lnq 6u!pnlou!) uo!lpin6ax 1pluauxuxano6 xo aoupulpxo 'noel Auy (e) • L :lo uoseax Aq asap yo!ynn sesuedxe xo seal ,sAouxolle 'slsoo 'a6ewep xo ssol Aud Jou 11!m Auedwo0 eqj pup Ao!lod s!yl 10 a6exano0 ay; uxoxl papnloxa Alssaxdxe axe sxallew bu!nnollol a41 MLL-OL WHOd A0110d S,li3NMO dlld smopol se axe suo!lelnd!JS pup suo!L!puo0 ayl to g ydex6exed ul of paxxalax 96eaan00 woxl suo!snlox3 ayl '1N3W11WW00 SIHl a311SS1 HOIHM 301dd0 3H1 lb AuinONI A8 a0 a3NOISSIWW00 30NVHnSNI 3H1 d0 301dd0 3H1 NI 311d NO SWHOd 01 30N3a3d3a A8 a3NIWVX3 38 Avw aw a3111WW00 AOIlOd d0 WHOd 3H1 :31ON SNoisniOX3 •luawl!uxwo0 s!yl 10 suolSlnaxd ay} of loafgns axe pup uo paseq eq lsnw }uawl!wwo0 s!yl Aq paxanoo uoaxayl a6e61xow eqj to snlels ayl xo lsaxalui xo alelse ayl of 911!1 ayl to snJels ayl to lno bu!sue Auedwo0 ayl lsu!e6e 6u!xq ABLU xo aney Aeux paxnsul pasodoxd ayl leyl uo!loe to sly6u xo suo!Joe xo uo!lop AUV •t, •u!axay peippow Aissaxdxe se ldeoxe luawl!wwo0 s!yl to laud a apew an, pup aouaxalax Aq palexodxoou! Agaxay axe ejegm paxnsul pasodoxd ayJ 10 xonel ul xol pall!wwoo sa!o!Iod xo Aogod to wxol eqj to 96pxano0 woxl suo!snlox3 pup 'suo!Lelnd-RS pup suo!L!puo0 ayl 'suo!s!noxd buunsui ayl of loefgns s! Aj!l!ge!l yons pup xol pell!wwoo sa!o!lod xo Ao!lod ayl xol y alnpayoS ui paJels lunowp ayl paeoxe Al!l!ge!l yons peys Juana ou ul •JuawJ!wwo0 slyl Aq paxanoo uoaxayl abubliow xo lsaxalui xo alelse ayl alpaxo xo axmbop of (o) xo '8 alnpayoS ul umoys suo!ldeoxe alpu!w!le of (q) xo 'loeieq sluawax!nbax ayl yl!m Aldwoo of (e) yl!el pooh u! 6u!�eJxepun ui uoaxay eoup!lax ui paxinouw ssol lenloe xol Aluo pup xol pell!wwoo sa!o!lod xo Ao!lod to wxol ayl ui paxnsul to uo!L!u!lap ayl xapun papnoow sa!lxed yons pup paxnsul pasodoxd poweu ayl of Aluo aq Ileys JuewJ!wwo0 s!yl xapun Auudwo0 ayl 10 Al!1!gp!l •6 •suo!lelnd!lS pup suo!L!puo0 asayl to g ydm6exed of lupnsxnd pennou! Aisnolnaxd Aj!l!ge!l woxl Auedwo0 ayl ana!lax lou Ileys luawpuewp yons Jnq 'Al6u!px000e lu9wl!wwo0 slyl to 8 alnpayoS puawe Aew uo!ldo sl! 1p Aupdwo0 eqj 'xallew xaylo xo wlelo asxanpe 'aoupxgwnoue 'ua!l 'loeiep yons Aue to e6pajmou� lenlop sannboe as!nnxaylo Aupdwo0 ayJ 1! xo 'Auedwo0 ayl of e5pejmou� yons asolos!p Ilpys paxnsul pasodoxd ayl 11 •96pejmou� yons asolos!p os of axnl!el Aq peo!pnfaxd s! Auedwo0 ayl lualxe ayl of uoaxay aoue!lax to lop Aue woxl 6u!llnsax e6ewpp xo ssol Aup xol Al!1!ge11 woxl pana!lax aq Ilpys Aupdwo0 eql 'bu!l!xnn u! Auedwo0 ayl of a6palnnou� yons asolos!p of I1el Ilpys pup 'uoaxay 8 alnpayoS ui umoys asoyl ueyl xaylo luawl!wwo0 s!yl Aq paxanoo uoaxayl a6p61xow xo JSaxalul xo alplsa ayJ 6u110011p xalJpux xaylo xo ux!plo 8Sxanpe 'aoupxgwnoua 'u9!1 'loalap Aup to e5palnnou� lenloe saxmbop xo spy paxnsul pasodoxd ayl 11 •Juawnxlsu! Alpnoes xaylo xo peep LsnxJ 'Jsnxl to peep apnlou! Nuys 'Maxey pasn uegm „'9be6lxow„ wxal ayl • L SNouvindas aNV SNoiiiaNO3 CHJ/='-�.GG TT—L.E INSURANCE Cl -IPANY /ot nrrH AV8NUE, #H,90, SEATTLE, WA 98104 A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Title Unit: U-06 SECOND COMMITMENT Phone: (206)628-5610 Fax: (206)628-9717 Order No.: 1065302 Officer: SAVIDIS/WAGNER/CAMPBELL Your No.: CAMPUS CREST/PAULUS/PLEMMO Commitment Effective Date: MAY 14, 2003 at 8:00 A.M. 1. Policy or Policies to be issued: PREMIUM APPLICABLE BETWEEN $200,001.00 - $220,000.00 ALTA Owner's Policy Amount: $ 2 2 0, 0 0 0 .0 0 1992 STANDARD Premium: 700.00 COhtERCIAL OWNERS STANDARD SHORT TERM RATE Tax: 61.60 Proposed Insured: BRAD PLEMMONS AND KATHY PLEMMONS, HUSBAND AND WIFE Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount: $ 0 . 0 0 ALTA Loan Policy Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount: $ 0 . 0 0 ALTA Loan Policy Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Commitment is: FEE SIMPLE 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: POLYGON SHELTER, INC. AND WERNER K. PAULUS, A MARRIED MAN, AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE, AS TENANTS IN COMMON 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT WLTACOMA/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1065302 Your No.: LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SAID PORTION BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF SOUTH 89000'18" EAST 335.78 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01035'16" WEST 42.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8501170665, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN SOUTH 89000'18" EAST 18.07 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 658.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY 700.54 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 60059'59"; THENCE SOUTH 28000'19" EAST 422.43 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING AND THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 842.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 217.49 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14047'59" TO A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 47011142" WEST; THENCE LEAVING SAID MARGIN ALONG THE NON -TANGENT EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT SOUTH 01013'12" WEST.390.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT NORTH 88059'20" WEST 561.92 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 897.03 FEET (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 74048'34" WEST); THENCE NORTHERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY 732.77 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 46048'15" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CLTACMA6/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Order No.: 1065302 Your No.: Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. B. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters whichwould be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. C. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. D. Any lien, or right to alien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. F. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, other utilities, or garbage collection and disposal. G. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. H. Water rights, claims, or title to water. I. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records, or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW WLTAC0MB/RDA/0M A B C CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 001065302 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1. UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION PURPOSE: ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM TOGETHER WITH ALL NECESSARY OR CONVENIENT APPURTENANCES THEREFOR AREA AFFECTED: PORTIONS OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY ADJOINING THE EXTERIOR MARGINS OF SOUTHWEST CAMPUS DRIVE RECORDED: APRIL 2, 1986 RECORDING NUMBER: 8604020489 CONTAINS COVENANT PROHIBITING STRUCTURES OVER SAID EASEMENT OR OTHER ACTIVITIES WHICH MIGHT ENDANGER THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: FEDERAL WAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PURPOSE: SEWER FACILITIES AND ALL APPURTENANCES RELATED THERETO AREA AFFECTED: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY RECORDED: NOVEMBER 17, 1987 RECORDING NUMBER: 8711170788 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: KING COUNTY PURPOSE: SLOPES, DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES AREA AFFECTED: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 10 FEET IN WIDTH LYING PARALLEL TO AND ADJOINING SOUTHWEST CAMPUS DRIVE RECORDED: AUGUST 11, 1989 RECORDING NUMBER: 8908110283 CLTACMBl/RDA/0999 M E CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1065302 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION PURPOSE: GAS PIPELINES) AND APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 15 FEET WIDE LOCATED SOUTHERLY OF, PARALLEL TO AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SOUTHWEST CAMPUS DRIVE RECORDED: AUGUST 7, 1990 RECORDING NUMBER: 9008070651 S. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PEI-YI CORPORATION PURPOSE: CONSTRUCTION STORM SEWER AREA AFFECTED: EAST 50 FEET RECORDED: FEBRUARY 4, 2002 RECORDING NUMBER: 20020204000039 6. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND: THE QUADRANT CORPORATION RECORDED: MARCH 5, 1990 RECORDING NUMBER: 9003051119 REGARDING: RESTRICTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF SAID PREMISES F 7. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: KING COUNTY RECORDED: JANUARY 17, 1985 RECORDING NUMBER: 8501170665 CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1065302 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS G AFFECTS: THAT PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY ABUTTING SOUTHWEST CAMPUS DRIVE H 8. FACILITY CHARGES, IF ANY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO HOOK-UP OR CONNECTION CHARGES AND LATECOMER CHARGES FOR WATER OR SEWER FACILITIES OF WATER DISTRICT NO. 124, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8106010916. I 9. PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. PRESENT RATE IS 1.780. ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCISE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS. J 10. THE PROPOSED CONVEYANCE MUST BE AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DIRECTORS OF THE FOLLOWING NAMED CORPORATION AND A COPY SUBMITTED: POLYGON SHELTER, INC. K 11. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF TENANCY IN COMMON AGREEMENT BETWEEN POLYGON SHELTER, INC. AND WERNER K. PAULUS. V 12. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES 2003 192104-9044-09 1205 $ 381,900.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 4,741.96 PAID: $ 2,370.98 CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1065302 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS UNPAID: $ 2,370.98 0 NOTE 1: AS OF THE DATE HEREOF THERE ARE NO MATTERS WHICH WOULD APPEAR AS EXCEPTIONS IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE AGAINST: BRAD PLEMMONS AND KATHY PLEMMONS L NOTE 2: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE COUNTY RECORDER OR IMPOSITION OF A $50.00 SURCHARGE. FIRST PAGE OR COVER SHEET REQUIREMENTS: 3" TOP MARGIN CONTAINING NOTHING EXCEPT THE RETURN ADDRESS. 1" SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. TITLES) OF DOCUMENTS. RECORDING NO. OF ANY ASSIGNED, RELEASED OR REFERENCED DOCUMENT(S). GRANTORS NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND). GRANTEES NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND). ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AND PAGE NO. FOR FULL DESCRIPTION). ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S). RETURN ADDRESS (IN TOP 3" MARGIN). **A COVER SHEET CAN BE ATTACHED CONTAINING THE ABOVE FORMAT AND DATA IF THE FIRST PAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL REQUIRED DATA. ADDITIONAL PAGES: 1" TOP, SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. ALL PAGES: NO STAPLED OR TAPED ATTACHMENTS. EACH ATTACHMENT MUST BE A SEPARATE PAGE. ALL NOTARY AND OTHER PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED FOR VISIBILITY. FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER. ALL INFORMATION MUST BE LEGIBLE AND CAPABLE OF BEING IMAGED. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 65.04. CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1065302 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF 19-21-4. END OF SCHEDULE B CLTACMB2/RDA/09W CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1065302 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS Q THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS COMMITMENT: CTI/SCOTT SMOUSE 701 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 1800 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 1/0 (206)628-5693 TURNING POINT REALTY ADVISORS, LLC 4020 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NE, STE 107 CROWN POINTE CORP KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033-7862 POLYGON SHELTER MATTHEW BALKMAN 1/1 (425)739-6100 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 1102 COMMERCE STREET #300 TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402 BRUCE GOLDSTEIN 1/1 (253)926-6000 POLYGON SHELTER, INC. P.O. BOX 178 BOW, WASHINGTON 98232 LAURA MINTON BRECKENRIDGE 1/1 (360)766-7000 CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 EXCLUSIONS (Cont'd.) 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. ALTA LOAN POLICY FORM (10-17-92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separa- tion in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encum- brance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 6. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending iaw. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim or priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is con- tracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. w H � z o O � � U CITY HALL 33530 1 st Way South PO Box 9718 April 3, 2003 Mr. Brad Plemmons 101 T Street S.E. AubUrn,'vVA 98002 Re: File No. 03-100362-00-PC; Rachel Ridge Preliminary Plat Dear Mr. Plemmons: (253) 661-4000 Federal Ways 1�11AP8063-9718 JUN 2 6 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. Thank you for providing me a copy of the March 4, 2003 letter you received from Jim Harris, Senior Planner regarding -the Pre -application Conference Summary. I have looked at the preliminary plat submitted and have the following comments: 1. Request for fee -in -lieu: The proposed plat is within the Park Planning Area C. I would accept fee -in -lieu for this project. The funds collected will be applied toward the development of a neighborhood park within this planning area. 2. Impact to Saghalie park: It appears from the plat map, the extension of 10°i Avenue SW will require an easement for a section of the new road. Saghalie Park is fully developed and the proposed road as shown will not negatively impact the park. 3. Parks Department has no interest to contribute to upgrading the design standard for the new road. I hope you find this information useful to you. If you have any questions, my number is 253-661- 4040. Sincerely, ]erini er Schroder, Director Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services cc: Jim Harris, Senior Planner . FILE CITY OF Federal Way COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO THE FEDERAL WAY HEARING EXAMINER CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL 5b 1000 Block of SW Campus Drive Federal Way File No. 03-102632-00-UP PUBLIC HEARING — December 14, 2004 FEDERAL WAY CITY HALL CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 33325 81h AVENUE SOUTH Table of Contents I. General Information.............................................................................................................2 II. Consulted Departments, Agencies, and Public....................................................................5 III. State Environmental Policy Act...........................................................................................6 IV. Analysis of Decisional Criteria............................................................................................6 V. Findings of Fact and Conclusion.........................................................................................8 VIRecommendation ...............................................................................:..............................10 VII. List of Exhibits...................................................................................................................10 Report Prepared by: Jim Harris, Senior Planner December 7, 2004 I File No: 03-102632-00-UP Applicant: Brad Plemmons Brad Plemmons Enterprises 101 T Street SE Auburn, WA 98002 Phone: 206-293-1434 Owner: Werner Paulus and Polygon Shelter Inc Action Requested: The applicant has requested modification of a February 27, 1990, concomitant zoning agreement (CZA) as amended by City Council resolution 93-128 and resolution 93-144. The CZA as amended pertains to a five -acre parcel located at approximately the 1000 block of SW Campus Drive. Pursuant to Section 8 of the 1990 agreement, amendment of the existing agreement shall be processed in the same manner as a rezone of property. Staff Representative: Jim Harris, Senior Planner, 253-835-2641 Staff Recommendation: Adoption of the proposed new Concomitant Agreement, superseding the 1990 Concomitant Zoning Agreement as amended. (Refer to Section VI) I GENERAL INFORMATION A. Description of the Proposal — The applicant has requested to amend the existing 1990 Concomitant Zoning Agreement (CZA) relating to certain property known as Campus Crest (Parcel 5B) (Exhibit A Master Land Use Application) (Exhibit B Applicant's request, August 27, 2003). The applicant is the contract purchaser of the subject property as identified in the Notice of Interest in Property, June 18, 2003 (Exhibit Q. The requested CZA amendment would allow the subject property to be developed with both single-family and multi -family development, whereas under the 1990 CZA only multi -family use is permissible. In addition, the applicant has requested to modify terms of the agreement in regard to the following subjects: status of building permit application; landscape standards abutting single-family zoning; building setbacks along Campus Drive; required improvements to Campus Drive; building height; maximum density of 347 units; phased construction; housing type; and 10`h Avenue corridor dedication and construction. Pursuant to Section 8 of the 1990 CZA, amendments of the agreement shall be considered and heard, "by filing an application therefore, which shall be considered and heard in the same manner as a rezone of property." Therefore, this application is being reviewed via a Process V, Project Rezone (FWCC Section 22-477 et al), and will be heard concurrently with a preliminary plat application for the property. In order to simplify and consolidate the agreement applicable to the subject property, a new Concomitant Agreement (Exhibit D) superseding the 1990 Agreement and subsequent amending Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 2 Wynstone Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment 03-102632-00-UP/noc ro 29787 resolutions has been prepared rather than amending the 1990 Concomitant Zoning Agreement as amended. The subject property is comprised of approximately five acres and is currently zoned RM 2400*. RM-2400 is a multi -family zoning with a minimum of 2,400 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit for multi -family use. The asterisk (*) denotes that the property is subject to a concomitant zoning agreement. The subject parcel known as Campus Crest or Parcel 513 comprises only a portion of the proposed Wynstone preliminary plat, which is being reviewed concurrently by the Hearing Examiner under File No. 03-102630-00-SU. The proposed action is depicted in the following documents: Wynstone preliminary plat map, revised May 10, 2004 (sheet 1 of 1); along with the Wynstone Preliminary Roads, Drainage and Utilities Plan (sheet 1 of 1), revised October 20, 2004; Wynstone Preliminary Grading Plan dated revised October 20, 2004; Wynstone Preliminary Grading Plan Cross Sections, November 20, 2004; Wynstone Preliminary Plat Road Profiles sheets 1-3 dated revised December 10, 2003; Wynstone Existing Tree Plan by Jaeger Engineering, March 14, 2003 sheet 1 of 1; and Wynstone preliminary landscape plan by Eagle Design, April 23, 2003. B. Location.— The site is located along the south and west side of SW Campus Drive at the intersection of 10th Avenue SW. C. Parcel No.—192104-9044. D. Size of Property — The subject site has a land area of approximately 218,235 square feet (5.01 acres). E. Land Use and Zoning — Direction Zoning Comprehensive Plan Existing Land Use Site RM-2400*' Multi -Family Vacant North RM-2400 Multiple -Family Multi -family RM-3600 South RS-7.2 SF - High Density SFW East RM-3600* Multiple -Family Vacant Pending Single-family pre plat West RM-2400 Multiple -Family Saghalie Park, Saghalie Middle RS-7.2 School, SFR F. Background — The CZA amendment request and associated preliminary plat of Wynstone were filed with the City on June 26, 2003. The application was determined complete on September 10, 2003. The Wynstone preliminary plat site is comprised of two separate parcels. One of the parcels that make-up the Wynstone site is subject to a 1990 Concomitant Zoning Agreement as amended. The Wynstone preliminary plat application includes a request to amend the Concomitant Zoning Agreement that applies to one of the Wynstone parcels. 1RM-2400 = multi -family residential, 2,400 SF minimum lot size. 'SFR = single-family residential Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner rage 3 Wynstone Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment 03-102632-00-UP/noe ro 29787 At the time of incorporation of the City of Federal Way in February 1990, an application by Polygon to develop parcel 5 of the Campus Crest Property was under review by King County. On February 27, 1990, a concomitant agreement between the City of Federal Way and Polygon (Exhibit E) was entered into relating to the zoning of a parcel of property commonly known as the Campus Crest Property (Parcel 5). Polygon and the City entered into the 1990 agreement for the purpose of resolving any potential disagreements with respect to vesting rights and the applicability of King County or City of Federal Way regulations as a result of incorporation. The 1990 CZA set development standards for development of the site with up to 347 dwelling units. In summary, the 1990 CZA addresses the following items: status of a 1989 building permit application at King County; landscape standards abutting single-family zoning; building setbacks along Campus Drive; required improvements to Campus Drive; building height; maximum density of 347 units; phased construction; housing type; and 10`h Avenue corridor dedication. The 1990 agreement was amended in 1993 via Resolution 93-128 (Exhibit F). The effect of Resolution 93-128 was to eliminate a portion of the overall site (Parcel 5A) from the terms of the 1990 CZA with the effect that the zoning for Parcel 5A shall be RM 2400, with no modification to development conditions pursuant to the concomitant agreement. Parcel 5A is property comprised of approximately 16 acres that the City and Federal Way School District purchased from Polygon for the development and construction of Saghalie Park and Saghalie Junior High School. The 1990 agreement was amended a second time in 1993 via Resolution 93-144 (Exhibit G). The effect of Resolution 93-144 was to modify terms of the 1990 agreement in regard to landscape buffering adjacent to single-family zoning, and clarify provisions regarding timing and funding for the construction of 10`h Avenue SW. The applicant's submitted an August 27, 2003 written request, to amend the 1990 Concomitant Agreement as amended (Exhibit B). The current proposal for Parcel 5B includes development of the site with both single-family residences and multi -family development. Most of the terms of the 1990 CZA are inapplicable to the current proposal in respect to the proposed single-family and multi -family development. In order to simplify and consolidate the agreement applicable to the subject -property, a new Concomitant Agreement superseding the 1990 Agreement (as amended) has been prepared rather than amending the 1990 Concomitant Zoning Agreement as amended. Table 1 (Exhibit H) summarizes the provisions of the following: terms of the 1990 CZA; terms of Resolution 93-128; terms of Resolution 93-144; terms of the applicant's request for amendment of the CZA; and the City staff recommendation regarding the proposed new Concomitant Agreement. The proposed Concomitant Agreement will supersede the 1990 Agreement as amended and will result in the following actions summarized below and as described in detail in the proposed Concomitant Agreement: ■ Elimination of reference to the 1989 building permit application filed with King County. ■ Reduction of the required 60-foot landscape buffer and solid board fence, to a 20-foot wide buffer for the future multi -family site (lot 45), consistent with FWCC requirements. Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 4 Wynstone Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment 03-102632-00-UP/DocID 29787 ■ Retain the minimum 60-foot building setback along Campus Drive. + Retain the 30-foot maximum building height requirement; however, this item will be eliminated from the proposed agreement as it repeats the 30-foot height regulation in FWCC. ■ Replace the maximum density of 347 units on the previous 21-acre site (which equals 1 unit per 2,636 square feet of lot area), with a maximum, of 16 units on proposed lot 45 (which equals 1 unit per 2,636 square feet of lot area). ■ Eliminate the 1990 provision requiring phased construction of no more than 100 units per year. ■ Eliminate the 1990 provision requiring 1/3 of the site to be townhome units. + Clarify dedication, funding, and construction standards for 10ffi/12t' Avenue SW on the site. • Eliminate the provision allowing only multi -family housing and allow a mixture of single- family and multi -family use on the site. The proposed Concomitant Agreement under consideration constitutes an agreement that modifies the permitted use on the property and sets development standards relating to project mitigation, design standards, and development standards. As previously identified, the agreement is being presented to the Hearing Examiner through the rezone process as required by the 1990 CZA. Ultimately, the development standards contained within the agreement shall be consistent with the standards for the Wynstone preliminary plat. The agreement and the preliminary plat are mutually inclusive, in that as proposed, they must both be reviewed and approved or denied concurrently. II CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS, AGENCIES, AND PUBLIC The following departments, agencies, and individuals were advised of this application. A. Community Development Review Committee (CDRC), consisting of the Federal Way Community Development Services Planning and Building Divisions; Public Works Engineering and Traffic Divisions; Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources Department; Department of Public Safety (Police); Federal Way Fire Department; Lakehaven Utility District; and Federal Way Public Schools. CDRC comments have been incorporated into this report where applicable. B. All property owners within 300 feet of the site were mailed notices of the complete preliminary plat application and concomitant zoning agreement amendment request on September 17, 2003. The City also conducted other public notice on September 17, 2003, in accordance with City code requirements. C. In accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection," all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the site, and all affected agencies, were notified of the proposed action and the City's environmental decision. In addition, the site was posted and notice placed in the newspaper and on the City's official notice boards. Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 5 Wynstone Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment 03-102632-00-UP/Doc ro 29787 III STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT A. The City of Federal Way issued a Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) for the proposed action on September 1, 2004. This determination was based on review of information on file, including the environmental checklist, and staff evaluation of the environmental checklist for Wynstone, resulting in the conclusion that the proposal would not result in probable significant adverse impacts on the environment provided the applicant complies with the mitigation measures in the MDNS. B. The City received one comment letter on the proposed action from King County Metro during the 14-day SEPA comment period. C. No appeals of the environmental determination were submitted to the City. IV ANALYSIS OF DECISIONAL CRITERIA The FWCC establishes review procedures and decisional criteria for deciding upon various types of land use applications. Although the proposal is not a rezone, Section 8 of the 1990 CZA states: "the agreement may be amended by the owners by filing an application therefore, which shall be considered and heard in the same manner as a rezone of property." Therefore, pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning," Section 22-488, the Hearing Examiner shall use the following criteria for the requested CZA amendments: (1) The City may -approve an application for a quasi-judicial nonproject rezone only if it finds that: a. - The proposed rezone is in the best interest of the residents of the City; and Staff Comment: The proposal is not a rezone, but a request to amend a Concomitant Zoning Agreement. The site will be developed in accordance with all applicable City codes and policies. Development of the site in accordance with the proposed agreement and proposed preliminary plat, which provides a range of housing opportunities, is in the best interest of residents of the City. The proposed new Concomitant Agreement and associated preliminary plat will provide new housing opportunities for the public, assist in meeting the City's responsibilities under the state Growth Management Act related to housing targets, and will extend, interconnect, and provide infrastructure to support the proposed development in accordance with the City code and Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposed rezone is appropriate because either: 1. Conditions in the immediate vicinity of the subject property have so significantly changed since the property was given its present zoning and that, under those changed conditions, a rezone is within the public interest; or 2. The rezone will correct a zone classification or zone boundary that was inappropriate when established; Staff Comment: The proposal is not a rezone, but a request to amend a Concomitant Zoning Agreement. The site conditions in the vicinity have changed since adoption of the original CZA in 1990. Specifically, the adjacent site has been developed with a public park and public middle school on 16 acres of land. The school and park construction have resulted in roadway construction (SW 340u' Street) that terminates at the west side of the Wynstone Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 6 Wynstone Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment 03-102632-00-UP/Doc ro 29787 site. In addition, the adjacent Orchid Lane plat has extended 10`h Avenue SW to the boundary of the Wynstone plat. In addition, the building permit application for the multi- family/townhome project identified and referenced in the 1990 CZA agreement has expired. Since parcel 5 has been reduced in size from the original 21-acre parcel to its current five acres, development of the site in isolation under the existing CZA is impractical and may be unworkable. The applicant has assembled parcel 5B in conjunction with the adjacent eight -acre parcel in order to develop a consolidated residential project that includes both multi -family and single-family dousing consistent with the underlying zoning. C. It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; StaffComment: The subject property is designated multiple -family in the 2002 Comprehensive Plan. The new Concomitant Agreement will result in both single-family and multi -family development on the site. Both single-family and multi -family housing are permitted in the multiple -family land use designation. In addition, the proposal would result in construction of a segment of the I0`h/12'h Avenue SW corridor through the site, which is identified in the 2002 Comprehensive Plan. The proposal would also result in construction of an east -west street connection (SW 340'h Street), west of the IWh/l2`h corridor as depicted in the 2002 Comprehensive Plan. d. It is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those adopted by reference from the Comprehensive PIan; and Staff Comment: The proposed preliminary plat associated with the new Concomitant Agreement is being reviewed for compliance with all applicable City code requirements. The City's Community Development Review Committee has reviewed the proposal in relation to zoning code requirements and regulations. As proposed and recommended by City staff the proposed new Concomitant Agreement and associated preliminary plat will comply with all applicable codes and regulations. e. It is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Staff Comment: The proposal is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare, as it provides for a range of housing opportunities. In addition, the associated preliminary plat includes construction of infrastructure necessary to serve the future residents. The preliminary plat also provides for protection of wetlands and wetland buffers, open space, and fee -in -lieu of open space as allowed by FWCC. (2) The City may approve an application for a quasi-judicial project related rezone only if it finds that: a. The criteria in subsection (c)(1) of this section are met; and b. The proposed project complies with this chapter in all respects; and Staff Comment: The proposed preliminary plat associated with the new Concomitant Agreement as recommended by City staff is being reviewed for compliance with all applicable City Code requirements. The City's Community Development Review Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 7 Wynstone Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment 03-102632-00-UP/n« ro 29787 Committee has reviewed the proposal in relation to zoning, cc,de and subdivision code requirements and regulations. As proposed and recommended by City staff the proposed new Concomitant Agreement and associated preliminary plat will comply with all applicable codes and regulations. C. The site plan of the proposed project is designed to minimize all adverse impacts on the developed properties in the vicinity of the subject property; and Staff Comment. The proposed site plan minimizes adverse impacts on developed properties in the area. Specifically, the proposed multi -family parcel (lot 45) is adjacent to the existing Saghalie Park and is not adjacent to any existing single-family uses. Also, design of the project includes construction of new roadway connections (10`' 112`h Avenue SW and SW 340`s Street) through the site, which are identified in the City's 2002 Comprehensive Plan and discussed in the 1990 CZA as amended. The SEPA MDNS issued on September 1, 2004, includes mitigation measures for the traffic, erosion, and neighborhood traffic impacts. d. The site plan is designed to minimize impacts upon the public services and utilities; and Staff Comment: The proposed Concomitant Agreement as recommended by staff allows for two different housing types rather than the current CZA which allows only multi -family housing. The proposed Concomitant Agreement results in a reduction in density on the site from 82 potential units to a maximum of 30 proposed units on the applicable portion of the Wynstone site, and the proposal will result in less impact on public services and utilities than would result under the existing CZA provisions and density allowance. The proposal also includes construction of utility and roadway improvements commensurate with the proposal and these improvements will mitigate impacts to public services and utilities. e. The rezone has merit and value for the community as a whole. Staff Comment: The proposal is not a rezone, but a request to amend a Concomitant Zoning Agreement. The new Concomitant Agreement, if approved, will result in development of both single-family and multi -family housing in accordance with applicable City standards, rather than just multi -family housing as currently permitted in the 1990 CZA as amended. The proposed project will provide two different housing types for the public. In addition, the proposal will include construction of required utility and roadway improvements. By providing new development in accordance with FWCC standards including compliance with open space provisions, payment of school impact mitigation and traffic mitigation fees, providing two housing types, and construction of utilities and roadway improvements, the proposal has merit and value to the community as a whole. V FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS vironmental record, and related decisional criteria, the Based on an analysis of the proposed action, en Department of Community Development Services finds that: 1. The application is for revision to Concomitant Agreement between the City of Federal Way and Polygon, for a 5.01-acre parcel of property known as the Campus Crest property, Parcel 5B, located along the south and west side of SW Campus Drive at the 1000 Block. Page 8 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner 03-102632-00-UP/Doe M 29787 Wynstone Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment The site is zoned RM 2400*. Both multi -family and single-family uses are permitted in the RM 2400 zone. The 1990 Concomitant Agreement as amended allows only multi -family housing on the site and the agreement also contains development standards for the site pertaining to the following: status of a 1989 building permit application at King County; landscape standards abutting single-family zoning; building setbacks along Campus Drive; required improvements to Campus Drive; building height; maximum density of 347 units; phased construction; housing type; and 10'h Avenue corridor dedication. 4. The 1990 CZA was amended twice in 1993 by City Council Resolution. The effect of Resolution 93-128 was to eliminate Parcel 5A from the terms of the 1990 CZA with the effect that the zoning for Parcel 5A shall be RM 2400. Parcel 5A is property comprised of approximately 16 acres that the City and Federal Way School District purchased from Polygon for the development and construction of Saghalie Park and Saghalie Junior High School. The 1990 agreement was amended a second time in 1993 via Resolution 93-144. The effect of Resolution 93-144 was to modify terms of the 1990 agreement in regard to landscape buffering adjacent to single-family zoning, and clarify provisions regarding timing and funding for the construction of 10'h Avenue SW. 5. Pursuant to Section 8 of the 1990 CZA, the agreement may be amended by the owners by filing an application therefore, which shall be considered and heard in the same manner as a rezone of property. 6. Since parcel 5 has been reduced in size from the original 21-acre parcel to it's current five acres, development of the site in isolation under the existing CZA is impractical and may be unworkable. 7. The applicant has assembled parcel 5B in conjunction with the adjacent eight -acre parcel in order to develop a consolidated 13-acre residential project that includes both multi -family and single-family housing consistent with the underlying zoning. 8. The current preliminary plat application for Parcel 513 includes development of the site with both single-family residences and multi -family development. Most of the terms of the 1990 CZA are inapplicable to the current proposal in respect to proposed single-family and multi -family development. In order to simplify and consolidate the agreement applicable to the subject property, a new Concomitant Agreement superseding the 1990 Agreement (as amended) has been prepared rather than amending the 1990 Concomitant Zoning Agreement as amended. 9. The proposed Concomitant Agreement is being reviewed concurrently with a preliminary plat application, which includes the subject properly and an abutting parcel. 10. If approved, the proposal will result in a new agreement that allows single-family and multi- faniily use of the property. In addition, the new agreement modifies and memorializes terms of the agreement in regard to the following subjects: status of building permit application; landscape standards abutting single-family zoning; building setbacks along Campus Drive; required improvements to Campus Drive; building height; maximum density of 347 units; phased construction; housing type; and 10'h Avenue corridor dedication and construction, as fully described in the new Concomitant Agreement. Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 9 Wynstone Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment 03-102632-00-UP/no- ro 29787 11. The development standards of the proposed Wynstone preliminary plat shall be consistent with the standards contained in the agreement. The agreement and the preliminary plat are mutually -inclusive, in that as proposed, they must both be reviewed and approved or denied concurrently. 12. An Environmental Miligated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) was issued for this proposed action on September 1, 2004. The City received no appeals of the SEPA determination and the SEPA appeal period expired on September 29, 2004. 13. The proposal has been reviewed for compliance with Federal Way City Code and the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. The proposal meets the decisional criteria for the rezone process in FWCC Section 22-488 as discussed in Section IV above. VI RECOMMENDATION Based on review of this application, environmental record, and pertinent decisional criteria, the Department of Community Development Services recommends approval of the new Concomitant Agreement, subject to approval of the preliminary plat of Wynstone. VII LIST OF EXHIBITS A. Master Land Use Application B. Letter from Brad Plemmons, August 27,2003 C. Notice of Interest in Property, June 18, 2003 D. Draft Concomitant Agreement E. 1990 Concomitant Agreement F. Resolution 93-128, with Hearing Examiner's Recommendation G. Resolution 93-144, with Hearing Examiner's Recommendation and Staff Report H. Table 1, Summary of Agreement History Note: Copies of exhibits are not attached to all copies of this report. All exhibits have been provided to the Hearing Examiner. TRANSMITTED TO THE PARTIES LISTED HEREAFTER: Federal Way Hearing Examiner Applicant Agent — Jaeger Engineering Applicant Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 10 Wynstone Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment 03-102632-00-UP/Doc m 29787 FILE Feral edWay COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO THE FEDERAL WAY HEARING EXAMINER Wynstone Preliminary Plat Federal Way File No. 03-102630-00-SU PUBLIC HEARING — December 14, 2004 FEDERAL WAY CITY HALL CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 33325 8t' AVENUE SOUTH Table of Contents I. General Information.............................................................................................................2 II. Consulted Departments, Agencies, and Public ....................................................................3 III. State Environmental Policy Act...........................................................................................4 IV. Natural Environment............................................................................................................4 V. Neighborhood Characteristics..............................................................................................5 VI. General Design.....................................................................................................................5 VII. Transportation......................................................................................................................8 VIII. Public Services.....................................................................................................................9 IX. Utilities...............................................................................................................................10 X. Analysis of Decisional Criteria..........................................................................................11 XI. Findings of Fact and Conclusions.....................................................................................12 XII. Recommendation...............................................................................................................16 XIII. List of Exhibits...................................................................................................................17 Report Prepared by: Jim Harris, Senior Planner December 7, 2004 File No: 03-102630-00-SU Engineer: Mr. Jim Jaeger Jaeger Engineering 9419 South 204'' Place Kent, WA 98031 Phone:253-850-0934 Owner: Brad Plemmons Brad Plemmons Enterprises 101 T Street SE Auburn, WA 98002 Phone: 206-293-1434 Action Requested: Preliminary plat approval of a 45-lot residential subdivision as provided for under Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," and requiring approval pursuant to FWCC Section 20-110. Staff Representative: Jim Harris, Senior Planner, 253-835-2641 Staff Recommendation: Preliminary Plat Approval with Conditions (Refer to Section XII) GENERAL INFORMATION A. Description of the Proposal— The applicant proposes to subdivide two vacant parcels totaling approximately 13.49 acres into 45 separate lots. Lots 1 through 44 are intended for single-family use and lot number 45 on the preliminary plat is for future multi -family development. The southerly property (tax lot 192104-9030) is comprised of approximately 8.4 acres and is zoned RS 7.2 (residential single-family, 7,200 square -foot minimum lot size). The northerly property (tax lot 192104-9044) is comprised of approximately five acres and is currently zoned RM-2400*. RM-2400 is a multi -family zoning designation, requiring a minimum of 2,400 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit for multi -family development. The asterisk (*) denotes that a property is subject to a concomitant zoning agreement. The proposed action is depicted in the following documents: Wynstone preliminary plat map, revised May 10, 2004 (sheet 1 of 1); along with the Wynstone Preliminary Roads, Drainage and Utilities Plan (sheet 1 of 1), revised October 20, 2004; Wynstone Preliminary Grading Plan dated revised October 20, 2004; Wynstone Preliminary Grading Plan Cross Sections, November 20, 2004; Wynstone Preliminary Plat Road Profiles sheets 1-3 dated revised December 10, 2003; Wynstone Existing Tree Plan by Jaeger Engineering, March 14, 2003 sheet 1 of 1; and Wynstone Preliminary Landscape Plan by Eagle Design, April 23, 2003 (Exhibit 1). The applicant has requested to modify certain provisions of the existing 1990 concomitant zoning agreement applicable to parcel 192104-9044, as the proposed preliminary plat does not Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03-102630-00-SU / nog ro 29393 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 2 comply with the terms of the 1990 Agreement as amended. The staff report and recommendation on the CZA amendment is under separate cover to the Hearing Examiner, and the Examiner will review and hold a public hearing on the CZA amendment request concurrent with the preliminary plat. In respect to site access, roadway connections and utilities, development of the entire site is integral in meeting applicable City standards. Therefore, since single-family use is not permitted on parcel 192104-9044 under the terms of the existing concomitant zoning agreement, approval of a new Concomitant Agreement is required concurrent with approval of the preliminary plat. B. Location — The site is generally located along the south side of SW Campus Drive at the intersection of 10`h Avenue SW. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 12`h Avenue SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, WA. C. Parcel Nos. — 192104-9044 and 192104-9030. The site legal description is on the plat map. D. Size of Property— The subject site has a land area of 587,624 square feet (13.49 acres). E. Land Use and Zoning — Dierection Zoning Comprehensive Plan Existing Land Use SitRM-2400*1 Multi -Family Vacant RS-7.2 SF — High Density Vacant North RM-2400 Multiple -Family Multi -family RM-3600 South RS-7.2 SF - High Density SFR2 East RM-3600* Multiple -Family Vacant w/Pending Single-family Preliminary plat application West RM-2400* Multiple -Family Saghalie Park, Saghalie Middle RS-7.2 School, SFR F. Background— The preliminary plat of Wynstone was submitted on June 26, 2003 (Exhibit 2). The preliminary plat application includes a request to amend the concomitant zoning agreement that applies to one of the subject parcels. The application was determined complete on September 10, 2003_ II CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS, AGENCIES, AND PUIRLIC The fallowing departments, agencies, and individuals were advised of this application. A. Community Development Review Committee (CDRC), consisting of the Federal Way Community Development Services Planning and Building Divisions; Public Works Engineering and Traffic Divisions; Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources Department; Department of 'RS-7.2 - single-family residential, 7,200 SF minimum lot size. 2SFR = single-family residential. Wynstone Preliminary Plat Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner 03-102630-00-SU / Do- ID 29393 Page 3 Public Safety (Police); Federal Way Fire Department; Lakehaven Utility District; and Federal Way Public Schools. CDRC comments have been incorporated into this report where applicable. B. All property owners within 300 feet of the site were mailed notices of the complete preliminary plat application and concomitant zoning agreement amendmcnt request on September 17, 2003. The City also conducted other public notice on September 17, 2003, in accordance with City code requirements. C. In accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection," all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the site, and all affected agencies, were notified of the proposed action and the City's environmental decision. In addition, the site was posted and notice placed in the newspaper and on the City, s official notice boards. III STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT A. The City of Federal Way issued a Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsigtr oance (MDNS) (Exhibit 3) for the proposed action on September 1, 2004. This determination was based on review of information on file, including the environmental checklist (Exhibit 4), and staff evaluation of the environmental checklist for Wynstone, resulting in the conclusion that the proposal would not result in probable significant adverse impacts on the environment provided the applicant complies with the mitigation measures in the MDNS. B. The City received one comment letter on the proposed action from King County Metro (Exhibit 5), during the 14-day SERA comment period. C. No appeals of the environmental determination were submitted to the City. IV NATURAL ENVIRONMENT A. Soils —The applicant provided a geotechnical exploration and engineering evaluation by Berquist Engineering Services, December 15, 2003 (Exhibit 6). In addition, the applicant provided additional geotechnical information included in letters from Berquist Engineering Services dated April 15, 2004 and August 19, 2004 (Exhibits 7 and 8). The site soils are discussed in detail in the geotechnical report and addendums. The geotechnical report concludes that the site is suitable for residential development. The 1973 King County soils survey trap lists the soils type as Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC). Alderwood soils are characterized as moderately well drained soilsthat inchesaAgC soils areolidated to described asrongly capable fo�uid�ted substratum at a depth of an development, runoff is slow to medium, and erosion hazard is moderate. B. Topography —The site has a slope falling generally from south to north. In addition, the southwestern corner of the site generally falls in grade from north to south toward a small wetland near the southwest corner of the site. The overall slope of the site is approximately 15 percent slope in the northern half of the site, with areas of slope up to approximately 31 percent. The site does not have any steep slopes or any other geologically hazardous areas. There is a constructed cut slope in excess of 40 percent along the northern end of the site. However, since the cut slope was constructed in conjunction with construction of SW Campus Drive, this area is not considered as geologically hazardous (steep slope hazard) areas. 03-102630-00-SU nocID29393 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 4 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner C. Vegetation — The site is heavily wooded and consists primarily of second growth forest with a mixture of conifer and broadleaf deciduous trees, with a dense understory of native shrubs. Approval of the preliminary plat is subject to submittal and approval of a tree clearing plan and landscape plan pursuant to FWCC Section 20-186. City policy and FWCC Section 20-179 state "All natural vegetation shall be retained on the site to be subdivided except that which will be removed for improvements or grading approved in the preliminary subdivision or short subdivision... and; existing mature vegetation shall be retained to the maximum extent possible. " Retained significant trees outside of plat infrastructure areas are regulated under FWCC Section 22-1568, "Significant Trees," at the time of individual home construction. D. Wetlands — The applicant provided a wetland assessment from Habitat Technologies, April 8, 2003 (Exhibit 9). The wetland assessment identifies one small wetland on site, which is not a regulated wetland under FWCC, as it is approximately 1,029 square feet in size. The preliminary plat includes displacement of this wetland in conjunction with development of the site. In addition, the buffer of an off -site category II wetland extends onto the subject site near the southwest corner. The preliminary plat map preserves the 100-foot buffer with no intrusions. V NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS A. Vicinity— The property is situated generally in the south-central portion of the City. The site is located along Campus Drive, an arterial roadway and at the current terminus of 12`h Avenue SW, a collector roadway. The subject site abuts Saghalie Park, a residential subdivision (Orchid Lane), and vacant property with a proposed single-family residential plat. B. Public Parks —The site abuts Saghalie Park, which is a 32-acre community park. The site is also in close proximity to the City's BPA Trail. These parks provide recreational opportunities for residents in the area. VI GENERAL DESIGN A. Lot Size — The proposed Wynstone lots range in size from 5,140 square feet to 17,185 square feet for single-family use. Proposed lot 45 is approximately. one acre in size, and is intended for multi -family use and could yield up to 16 multi -family housing units under the terms and density allowance of the proposed Concomitant Agreement. All proposed lots on the southerly parcel (lot 192104-9030) meet the 7,200 square -foot minimum lot size for the underlying RS 7.2 zoning designation. All proposed lots on the northerly parcel (192104 9044).meet the minimum 5,000 square -foot minimum lot size for single-family residential use required in the RM zoning district (FWCC Section 22-666) as requested to be allowed in the proposed new Concomitant Agreement. B. Lot Layout — Most of the proposed lots are of rectangular shape, and six proposed lots gain access from panhandles connected to the lots. Each of the lots that include access via a panhandle abut an adjacent panhandle lot. In order to meet applicable driveway setback requirements and provide a 20-foot driveway and five-foot exterior setbacks for each lot, the abutting panhandles must include reciprocal access easements for the abutting parcels. Building setback lines (BSBL) are depicted on the preliminary plat map, and each lot contains an adequate building area. Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03-102630-00-SU / Doc m 29393 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 5 C. Open Space — To provide adequate recreational opportunities commensurate with new residential development, FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," requires dedication of land on site for open space, or a fee -in -lieu payment. Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-155(b), the applicant has requested to pay a fee -in -lieu of providing on -site open space. The City PARCS Director has agreed to a fee -in -lieu of on -site open space. The open space fee amount is 15 percent of the assessed land value at the time of final plat approval. Open space credit as allowed by City code for buffer open space in Tract C, constrained open space in Tract G, and usable open space in Tracts E and F, will be permitted. A final calculation of open space will be conducted with review of the final plat and must comply with FWCC. Open space fee in -lieu for 15 percent open space on proposed lot 45 (one -acre multi -family parcel) is not allowed by code or supported by staff in conjunction with the preliminary plat. The open space on lot 45 must be provided at the time of the future development on lot 45 and meet the provisions of FWCC Section 22-667 (note 2) regarding size, dimensional requirements, usability, etc., including development of at least 10 percent of the area with children's play equipment. Specifically, the code requirement of at least 400 square feet of open space per multi -family dwelling unit on lot 45 must be provided. In addition, the open space on lot 45 must also equal a minimum of 15 percent of the gross area of lot 45 (6,502 square feet of open space on lot 45), regardless of the eventual dwelling unit count of lot 45 (43,348 X 15% = 6,502 square feet). As described above, the open space on lot 45 must meet the more restrictive of the subdivision code requirement of 15 percent gross open space, or the multi -family open space/recreation area requirements of FWCC Section 22-667. Review and approval of the lot 45 open space will occur in conjunction with permitting and development of lot 45. D. Subdivision Access and Roadway System — Access to the site will be via construction of the IO'h/12`h Avenue corridor, extending from the intersection of 10'h Avenue SW and Campus Drive, through the site to the current terminus of 12" Avenue at the north end of the Orchid Lane subdivision. In addition, access to the site will be provided by extending SW 340`h Street through the Wynstone site, from its current terminus near Saghalie Park. The preliminary plat also includes construction of two cul-de-sac streets within the proposed subdivision. Section VII of this report provides a detailed description of the proposed roadway system and improvements. E. Pedestrian System — Sidewalks will be provided along all street frontages, except as proposed and recommended by City staff; a sidewalk is not required along the west side of 101h Avenue SW within tax parcel no. 192104-9044. Specifically, interior full street improvements include five-foot wide sidewalks on both sides of all streets, and eight -foot sidewalks on I Oth/12`h Avenue SW. - In accordance with FWCC Section 20-156, the subdivision includes two, 20-foot wide pedestrian and bicycle access tracts. The first pedestrian tract is labeled as Tract E and provides a pedestrian connection between the cul-de-sac of 12`h Place SW and IOth Avenue SW. The second pedestrian tract, identified as Tract F, connects from SW 3401h to an existing pedestrian tract in the Orchid Lane subdivision. Metro Transit commented on the proposal in a September 14, 2004 email, and due to potential increased transit use resulting from the project, Metro requests construction of a concrete passenger shelter footing and landing pad along Campus Drive SW (Exhibit 5). Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03-102630-00-SU / Doc ►n 29393 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 6 F. Landscape Buffers — In accordance with FWCC Section 20-178, a ten -foot wide Type III landscape strip shall be provided along all arterial streets to shield new residences from arterial streets. Campus Drive is an arterial street; therefore, landscape buffering along this street is required. The preliminary plat map provides a 60-foot wide landscape buffer within proposed Tract C. G. Clearing and Grading —Ina November 25, 2003, letter (Exhibit 10) to the City, the applicant has requested approval to clear and grade approximately half the future lots in conjunction with clearing and grading the site for infrastructure for the site. As described in the letter, the request to clear and grade the majority of parcel 192104-9044 is due to the unique topography of the site, extensive infrastructure requirements, and sizable off -site grading easement. In order to align the 101h/121h Corridor with -SW Campus Drive and to construct 12'h Court SW, approximately 35,000 cubic yards of existing material will need to be removed to establish street grades for the site. In regard to clearing and grading plats, FWCC Section 20-179 states: "All natural vegetation shall be retained on the site to be subdivided except that which will be removed for improvements or grading approved in the preliminary subdivision or short subdivision. " "Existing mature vegetation shall be retained to the maximum extent possible. " City staff supports the clearing and grading limits proposed on the preliminary clearing and grading plan by Jaeger Engineering dated revised10/20/04, based on the following factors: existing site topography which averages approximately 13 percent slope across the entire northern parcel, required cut depth up to 20 feet for construction of ldh/12� SW, and resultant irregular lot grades that would result without mass clearing and grading of the northern portion of the site. Without clearing and grading of the northern parcel, the resulting grades on future lots 1-18 would exceed 20 percent slope, and would result in the need for extensive additional grading to create building lots with finish grades conducive to single-family development. By allowing mass grading of the northern parcel, future lots 1-18 have finished grades with an approximately 14 percent slope as depicted on the preliminary grading plan. The preliminary grading plan identifies retaining walls proposed near the rear of lots 5 — 9 and around two sides of the proposed stormwater facility. The wall behind lots 5 — 9 are proposed to be constructed in two terraces, each no more than four feet tall and screened with plantings. The wall around a portion of the stormwater quality facility is proposed to be eight feet at the highest point. To minimize aesthetic impact and be consistent with the residential nature of the proposal, all walls shall include aesthetic treatment. H. Vegetation and Significant Trees — The Existing Tree Plan by Jaeger Engineering, 3/14/03, identifies 630 significant trees on the site. Approximately 270 trees to be removed are located within future right-of-way and utility areas and are not subject to the tree retention standards. Therefore, approximately 360 significant trees on the site are regulated for retention and replacement. As proposed, construction of the plat infrastructure and clearing and grading approximately half the proposed lots, will result in retention of approximately 155 significant trees on the site. Therefore, as proposed, the retention of 155 significant trees results in retention of 43 percent of the regulated trees, which exceeds the minimum retention standard of 25 percent.' Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03-102630-00-SU / Doc ID 29393 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 7 VII TRANSPORTATION A. Street Improvements — A March 31, 2004, revised Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) by Christopher Brown and Associates was submitted for the project (Exhibit 11). The City's Traffic Division has reviewed the project and concluded that the proposed street layout of the Wynstone subdivision is consistent with the adopted codes and comprehensive plan in place at the time of the complete application. Access to the site will be via construction of the l Oth/12th Avenue corridor, extending from the intersection of 10`h Avenue SW and Campus Drive, through the site to the current terminus of 121h Avenue at the north end of the Orchid Lane subdivision. In addition, access to the site will be provided by extending SW 340`h Street through the Wynstone site, from its current terminus near Saghalie Park. The preliminary plat also includes construction of two cul-de-sac streets within the proposed subdivision. Interior streets shall be designed and constructed by the applicant per FWCC requirements. In accordance with FWCC Section 20-176, all street improvements must be dedicated as City right-of-way and improved to full street standards, except the portion of 10th/12th on parcel 9044, where partial street improvements are permitted. 10`h/12th Avenue SW through the site is classified as a Principal Collector. Improvements to the project frontage along IOth/12th Avenue SW are depicted on the October 20, 2004 preliminary road and utility plan, by Jaeger Engineering, and improvements shall be completed prior to final plat approval. Improvements to 10`h/12th SW are required in accordance with City standards. The southern portion of 10`h/12th SW on tax parcel 192104-9030 shall be developed with full street improvements per City Standard Cross Section `M', including 36 feet of pavement in a 70- foot right-of-way, with vertical curbs, six-foot landscape strips with street trees, streetlights, and eight -foot sidewalks on both sides of the street. The northern portion of loth/12th SW on tax parcel 192104-9044 shall include street improvements per City Standard Cross Section `M', including clearing and grading the 70-foot right-of-way required for full street improvements. The east half of this street shall be developed with 18 feet of pavement, curb and gutter, six-foot landscape strip, street trees, eight -foot sidewalk, streetlights, and three-foot utility strip. The west side of this street shall include six feet of pavement plus thickened edge for a total width of 24 feet of pavement, drainage provisions, asphalt tapers at a 25:1 ratio, stabilization and erosion control of the graded areas. Campus Drive abutting the project site is classified as a Principal Arterial. Improvements to the project frontage along SW Campus Drive are depicted on the October 20, 2004 preliminary road and utilityplan, by Jaeger Engineering. Improvements to Campus Drive are required in accordance with City standards including additional asphalt paving to create a twelve -foot wide left -turn pocket to access loth Avenue SW from SW Campus Drive per City Standard Roadway Section `E', with concrete curb and gutter, six-foot planter strip with street trees and street lights, eight -foot sidewalk, and three-foot utility strip. The improvements shall provide sufficient new roadway taper east from the widened paved edge at the easterly property boundary. Along the Campus Drive frontage, a dedication of seven feet of property to the City is required for right-of- way. Improvements to the intersection of Campus Drive and 1 Oth SW shall be completed prior to final plat approval. Specifically, at the SW quadrant of the intersection, the following improvements shall be completed: extend existing curb, gutter, planter strip, and sidewalk around the radius to Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03-102630-00-SU / no. ro 29393 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 8 the southwest, terminating at the end of the curb return. Construct City -standard handicap access ramps at the NW and SW quadrants of the intersection. Add channelization in SW Campus Drive to create a left turn lane onto loth Avenue SW, into the proposed plat. Revise the left turn marking for traffic on the existing leg of l oth Avenue SW so that it will be a combined thru and left turn pavement marking. Channelization for the new section of 10`h Avenue SW shall be marked for two lanes of traffic: one lane westbound, with the southerly lane allowing for thru, left, and right turns. Within the plat and connecting off -site, SW 340`h Street shall be improved to Minor Collector Standard corresponding to a Cross -Section "S." The required street improvements include 36 feet of pavement with vertical curb and gutter, four -foot planter strips with street trees, five-foot sidewalks, and three-foot utility strips with streetlights, within a 60-foot wide dedicated right-of- way. Within the plat, 13th Court SW and 12th Place SW shall be improved to Local Street Standard corresponding to a Cross -Section "W." The required street improvements include 28 feet of pavement with vertical curb and gutter, four -foot planter strips with street trees, five-foot sidewalks, and three-foot utility strips with streetlights, within a 52-foot wide dedicated right-of- way. Street lighting is required on all streets, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1522. The Public Works Department and Federal Way Fire Department have approved preliminary roadway improvements and curve radius, as proposed. B. Off -Site Traffic Mitigation — This proposal has been reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The SEPA mitigation conditions require construction of City Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) projects that are impacted by 10 or more PM peak hour trips, or alternatively, the applicant may voluntarily contribute a pro-rata share to the impacted TIP projects. The MDNS specifically identifies that I2th Avenue SW between Campus Drive and it's current terminus at Orchid Lane, will be constructed by the Wynstone development. Required improvements to the project's street frontages are code -based requirements in the FWCC, and are independent of the SEPA mitigation. VIII PUBLIC SERVICES A. Schools — The City received written correspondence from Federal Way Public Schools dated May 21, 2003 (Exhibit 12), regarding the proposed Wynstone development. The Federal Way School District reviewed the proposed subdivision and noted that school students in the Wynstone site would attend the following schools under current service areas: Silver Lake Elementary, Saghalie Junior High, and Decatur High. The school district also noted that they could introduce discussion to change the elementary school boundary to Sherwood Forest, as the site is within one mile. Pursuant to the school district correspondence, students from the Wynstone site would walk to Sherwood Forest and Saghalie Junior High. Sidewalks and safe walking areas are provided from Wynstone to both of these schools. High school students would attend Decatur High and appropriate bus stops would be provided. School service areas are reviewed annually and may be adjusted to accommodate enrollment growth and new development. Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03-102630-00-SU / m. m 29393 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 9 School impact fees, as authorized by City ordinance and collected at the time of building permit issuance. For the year 2004, the school impact fee is $3,269.00 per single-family housing unit. School impact fees are determined on the basis of the district's Capital Facilities Plan and are subject to annual adjustment and update. B. Public Parks —The Wynstone site is adjacent to Saghalie Park and inclose proximity to the City's BPA trail. These public parks provide recreational opportunities for residents in the area. Open space requirements are discussed in Section VI of this report. C. Fire Protection — The Certificate of Water Availability from the Lakehaven Utility District indicates that water will be available to the site in sufficient quantity to satisfy fire now standards for the proposed development. The Fire Department requires that a fire hydrant be located within 350 feet of each lot. The exact number and location of fire hydrants will be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department. IX UTILITIES A. Sewage Disposal — The applicant proposes to serve the proposed plat by a public sewer system managed by Lakehaven Utility District. A May 22, 2003, Certificate of Sewer Availability (Exhibit 13) indicates the district's capacity to serve the proposed development through a Developer Extension Agreement (DEA) between the applicant and the district. B. Water Supply — The applicant proposes to serve the subdivision with a public water supply and distribution system managed by the Lakehaven Utility District. A May 22, 2003, Certificate of Water Availability (Exhibit 14) indicates Lakehaven's capacity to serve the proposed development through a DEA. C. Drainage Facilities — Development of the site will create additional runoff from new impervious surfaces such as streets, driveways, and rooftops. Storm drainage facilities are being designed in accordance with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the City's amendments to the manual. The applicant's December 2003, preliminary stormwater Technical Information Report (TIR) (Exhibit 15) by Jaeger Engineering, was reviewed by the City's Public Works Department. The site is divided into two separate drainage basins by a north -south running ridge located approximately 400 feet from the west property boundary. Level 1 flow control and Resource Stream Water Quality treatment are required for each drainage basin, per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and the City of Federal Way Addendum to the manual. Each drainage basin on the site lies within the Panther Lake Drainage Basin. As such, the applicant may provide on -site flow control to the Level 1 flow control standard, or elect to pay for off -site detention provided in Panther Lake. The cost for utilizing Panther Lake for off -site detention is $1,728.00 per gross acre. The preliminary indication is the applicant will choose to pay for off -site detention in Panther Lake. The applicant has proposed two constructed stormwater wetlands to serve the two separate drainage basins, to provide water quality treatment for the site. As proposed, this design meets the Resource Stream Protection requirement for water quality treatment. It can be expected to remove at least 80 percent total suspended solids, and 50 percent total zinc removal. Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03-102630-00-SU / Doc ro 29393 Staff' Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 10 The preliminary design proposes to collect and convey stormwater through a series of pipes and catch basins into two water quality treatment facilities, one located at the northeast corner of the site adjacent to SW Campus Drive, and the other located near the southwest corner of the site, adjacent to the proposed extension of SW 340th Street. In order,to mitigate potential erosion impacts to downstream drainage systems and Panther Lake, the applicant shall provide on -site Erosion and Sediment Control measures per the requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and the City of Federal Way Addendum to the manual. The City may further limit clearing and grading activities during the wet season (October 31 through March 31) per the SEPA mitigation measure. The proposed water quality facilities are adequate to serve the proposed development. Final review and approval of the storm drainage facilities as shown on the engineering plan will occur in conjunction with full drainage review. X ANALYSIS OF DECISIONAL CRITERIA The FWCC establishes review procedures and decisional criteria for deciding upon various types of land use applications. Pursuant to FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," Section 20-110, preliminary plat applications are submitted to the Hearing Examiner for public hearing. The preliminary plat application and the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner are submitted to the City Council for approval or disapproval. Hearing Examiner Preliminary Plat Decisional Criteria — Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-126(c), the Hearing Examiner may recommend approval of the proposed preliminary plat only if the following decisional criteria are met. Decisional criteria and staff responses are provided below. 1. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Comment: The application is subject to the adopted 2002 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), which designates the property as multiple -family for the northern parcel and single-family high density for the southern parcel. The proposed land uses on the two individual parcels is consistent with the underlying Comprehensive Plan designation. In addition, construction of 10th/121h Avenue SW, a Principle Collector, and construction of SW 340th Street, a Minor Collector, both identified in the Comprehensive Plan are being developed with the proposal. 2. The project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those adopted by reference from the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Comment: The preliminary plat application is required to comply with the provisions of the FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy," Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," Chapter 22, "Zoning," and all other applicable codes and regulations. Future development of the residential subdivision will be required to comply with all applicable development codes and regulations. As proposed, and with conditions as recommended by staff, the preliminary plat will comply with all provisions of the chapter. The preliminary plat application is not consistent with the 1990 Concomitant Zoning Agreement applicable to a portion of the site. However, the proposed preliminary plat is consistent with the proposed Concomitant Agreement for the applicable portion of the site. Therefore, the approval of the preliminary plat must be based on concurrent approval of the associated proposed Concomitant Agreement. Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03-102630-00-SU / Doc ID 29393 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 11 The project is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Staff Comment: The proposed preliminary plat would permit development of the site consistent with the current Single -Family High Density and Multiple Family land use classifications of the FWCP and map, provided the preliminary plat is consistent with and approved concurrently with the proposed Concomitant Agreement for the applicable portion of the site. Proposed access and fire hydrant locations must meet all requirements of the Federal Way Fire Department. Future development of the plat and associated improvements including street improvements, and other infrastructure improvements in accordance with applicable codes and regulations will ensure protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. It is consistent with the design criteria listed in Section 20-2. Staff Comment: The proposed preliminary plat would promote the purposes identified in FWCC Section 20-2, and the standards and regulations therein, as identified in the staff report, including effective use of land, promotion of safe and convenient travel on streets, and provision for the housing needs of the community. As proposed, and with conditions as recommended by City staff, the preliminary plat application complies with all provisions of the chapter. 5. It is consistent with the development standards listed in Sections 20-151 through 157, and 20- 158 through 187. Staff Comment: Development of this site is required to comply with the provisions of FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection," Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," Chapter 22, "Zoning," and all other applicable local and state development codes and regulations. As proposed, the plat is consistent with the FWCC requirements provided the recommended conditions of approval are adopted. XI FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS Based on an analysis of the proposed action, environmental record, and related decisional criteria, the Department of Community Development Services finds that: I. The proposed action is to subdivide two vacant parcels totaling approximately 13.49 acres into 45 separate lots. 2. Pursuant to the City's September 17, 2003 Notice of Complete Application, the plat is subject to codes and policies in place on September 10, 2003, including the 2002 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP). 3. The subject property is designated Multiple -Family for the northern parcel and Single -Family High Density for the southern parcel in the 2002 FWCP. 4. The two parcels comprising the site have different zoning designations. Parcel 192104-9030 is zoned RS-7.2, (minimum lot size 7,200 square feet). Parcel 192104-9030 is zoned RM2400*. The asterisk identifies that the property is subject to a concomitant zoning agreement. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-666, single-family residential use is permitted in the RM zoning District with a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet per lot. As recommended with conditional approval, the proposed residential subdivision and density is consistent with applicable zoning and subdivision regulations. Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03-102630-00-SU / Doc ►n 29393 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 12 5. The applicant has requested to modify certain provisions of the existing 1990 concomitant zoning agreement applicable to parcel 192104-9044. The staff report and recommendation on the CZA amendment is under separate cover to the Hearing Examiner, and the Examiner will review and hold a public hearing on the the CZA amendment request concurrent with the preliminary plat. 6. In respect to site access, roadway connections, and utilities, development of the entire site is integral in meeting applicable City standards. Therefore, since single-family use is not permitted on parcel 192104-9044 under the terms of the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement, approval of a new Concomitant Agreement is required concurrent with approval of the preliminary plat. If the new Concomitant Agreement is not adopted concurrent with approval of the preliminary plat application, then the preliminary plat application cannot be approved as proposed. 7. An Environmental Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) was issued for this proposed action on September 1, 2004. The City received no appeals of the SEPA determination, and the SEPA appeal period expired on September 29, 2004. 8. As proposed, each lot contains an adequate size and shape building envelope to contain a future single-family residence for lots 1 — 44. In addition, adequate area is provided for future multi- family development -on proposed lot 45. 9. Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-155, the applicant has proposed fee -in -lieu of on -site open space, in addition to proposed buffer open space in Tract C, usable open space in Tracts E and F, and conservation open space in Tract G, to the extent permissible under FWCC Section 20-155. The fee -in -lieu of on -site open space shall be paid at the time of final plat approval. 10. The open space on lot 45 must be provided at the time of the future development on lot 45 and meet the provisions of FWCC Section 22-667 (note 2) regarding size, dimensional requirements, usability, etc., including development of at least 10 percent of the area with children's play equipment. Specifically, the code requirement of at least 400 square feet of open space per dwelling unit on lot 45 must be provided. In addition, the open space on lot 45 must also equal a minimum of 15 percent of the gross area of lot 45 (6,502 square feet of open space on lot 45), regardless of the eventual dwelling unit count of lot 45 (43,348 X 15% = 6,502 square feet). As described above, the open space on lot 45 must meet the more restrictive of the subdivision code requirement of 15 percent gross open space, or the multi -family open space/recreation area requirements of FWCC Section 22-667. Review and approval of the lot 45 open space will occur in conjunction with permitting and development of lot 45. 11. The applicant provided geotechnical engineering analysis and recommendations from Berquist Engineering Services, in correspondence dated December 15, 2003 (Exhibit 6), April 15, 2004 (Exhibit 7), and August 19, 2004 (Exhibit 8). The geotechnical reports provide engineering analysis of cut and fill slopes and recommended setbacks, and classification of the subsurface soils for design of the stormwater management facilities. The applicant shall design and construct the project in accordance with all recommendations from the geotechnical engineer. 12. Ina November 23, 2004, letter (Exhibit 10) to the City, the applicant has requested approval to clearand grade approximately half the future lots in conjunction with clearing and grading the site for infrastructure for the site. As described in the letter, the request to clear and grade the Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03-102630-00-SU / Doc ID 29393 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 13 majority of parcel 192104-9044 is due to the site's unique topography, extensive infrastructure and sizable off -site grading easement. In order to align the IOlh/l2`h Corridor with SW Campus Drive and to construct 121h Court SW, approximately 35,000 cubic yards of existing material will need to be removed to establish street grades. City staff supports the clearing and grading limits proposed on the preliminary clearing and grading plan by Jaeger Engineering, dated revised10/20/04, based on the following factors: existing site topography which averages approximately 13 percent slope across the entire northern parcel, the need for cutting up to 20 feet of ground for roadway construction, and due to the extreme resultant grades of future residential lots if mass grading were not allowed. Without clearing and grading of the northern parcel, the resulting grades on future lots 1-18 would exceed 20 percent slope, and would result in the need for extensive additional grading to create building lots with finish grades conducive to single-family development. By allowing mass grading of the northern parcel, future lots 1-18 have finished grades with an approximately 14 percent slope as depicted on the preliminary grading plan. 13. The preliminary grading plan identifies retaining walls proposed near the rear of lots 5 — 9 and around two sides of the proposed stormwater facility. The wall behind lots 5 — 9 are proposed to be constructed in two terraces, each no more than four feet tall and screened with plantings. The wall around a portion of the stormwater quality facility is proposed to be eight feet at the highest point. To minimize aesthetic impact and be consistent with the residential nature of the proposal, all walls shall include aesthetic treatment. 14. The subject property is wooded with primarily second growth forest. Significant tree retention and/or replacement shall be provided in accordance with FWCC Section 20-179 and 22-1568. Trees that may be left on individual lots following the plat infrastructure construction may be removed during individual home construction and subject to retention and replacement standards of FWCC Section 22-1568. 15. The 3/14/03 Existing Tree Plan, by Jaeger Engineering, identifies a total of 488 significant trees to be removed from the site. As proposed, construction of the plat infrastructure and clearing and grading approximately half the proposed lots, will result in retention of approximately 155 significant trees on the site. Therefore, as proposed, the retention of 155 significant trees results in retention of 43 percent of the regulated trees, which exceeds the minimum retention standard of 25 percent. 16. Prior to issuance of construction permits, a final landscape plan, prepared by a licensed landscape architect, shall be submitted to the City for approval in accordance with FWCC requirements. The landscape improvements shall be completed prior to final plat approval, unless a financial guarantee is approved by the City for completion of the landscape improvements. The final landscape plan shall include, at a minimum, the following elements: A. Arterial buffer landscaping in Tract C per FWCC Section 20-178; B. Street trees in right-of-way landscape planter strips per Public Works Department Standards; C. Landscaping of Tracts D and H with vegetation including trees, shrubs, and groundcover, -to provide a visual separation between the public right-of-way and the proposed stormwater facilities. These landscape tracts shall be owned and maintained by the homeowners' Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03-102630-00-SU / Doc ID 29393 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 14 association. The landscape tracts shall be developed with Type III landscaping. If cyclone fencing is used around the storm drainage ponds, the fencing shall be coated black or green. D. Restoration and landscaping of slopes resulting from clearing, grading, and construction roadways. E. Landscaping adjacent to proposed retaining walls on lots 5 — 9. 17. In order to provide transit facilities for the proposed action, in accordance with RCW 58.17.110, Metro Transit has requested the developer to design and construct a bus stop shelter footing and bus stop landing in accordance with King County Metro standards. Prior to construction, the applicant shall provide the City with approval of the landing design and location from Metro. 18. Development of the site will create additional runoff from new impervious surfaces such as streets, driveways, and rooftops. Storm drainage facilities are being designed in accordance with the 1998 KCSWDM and the City's amendments to the manual. The applicant's preliminary storm drainage TIR by Jaeger Engineering, as revised December 2003, was reviewed and accepted by the City's Public Works Department. Level 1 flow control and Resource Stream Water Quality Protection are required for this site per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and the City of Federal Way Addendum to the manual. In lieu of providing on -site flow control, the applicant has chosen to pay the pro-rata share fee of $1,728.00 per gross acre for off -site detention in Panther Lake. In addition, the applicant has proposed two constructed wetlands, to serve the two separate basins on this site, which meet the Resource Stream Protection requirements for water quality treatment. In order to mitigate potential erosion impacts to downstream drainage systems and Panther Lake, the applicant shall provide on -site Erosion and Sediment Control measures per the requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and the City of Federal Way Addendum to the manual. The proposed flow control and water quality facilities are adequate to serve the proposed development. Final review and approval of the storm drainage facilities as shown on the engineering plan will occur in conjunction with full drainage review. 19. A March 31, 2004, revised Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) by Christopher Brown & Associates was submitted for the project. Public access will be provided from entrances to SW 340'h, 12"' Avenue SW, and from Campus Drive at 101h Avenue SW. The plat also includes construction of a new interior street system that interconnects the three access points. The project will result in approximately 63 new weekday evening peak hour trips. The City's Traffic Engineer has reviewed the project and concluded that the proposed street layout of the Wynstone subdivision is consistent with the adopted codes and Comprehensive Plan in place at the time of the complete application. Street improvements proposed and required for the proposal are depicted on the 10/20/04 Preliminary Road, Drainage and Utility Plan by Jaeger Engineering, and the 12/10/03 Preliminary Plat Road Profiles Plan by Jaeger Engineering. The street improvements are described in detail in Section VIII of the staff report and are incorporated by reference as set forth in full. All public right-of-ways will be dedicated to the City. Pedestrian Tracts E and F, as Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03-102630-00-SU / oo. m 29393 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 15 proposed, meet applicable City standards for pedestrian tracts including a 20-foot width with a 12-foot wide paved walkway. 20. New sidewalks and pedestrian facility improvements in conjunction with existing walking areas will provide a safe pedestrian route of travel for school children who walk from Wynstone to Sherwood Forest Elementary School and Saghalie Junior High. School children would be provided bus transportation from Wynstone to Decatur High School. 21. Water and sewer facilities are available from the Lakehaven Utility District and are adequate to serve the proposed development. It is the applicant's responsibility to secure all necessary water and sewer services from the utility provider. 22. The proposed preliminary plat is permitted by FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," and Chapter 22, "Zoning." 23. The proposed subdivision and all attachments have been reviewed for compliance with the FWCP; FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection," Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," Chapter 22, "Zoning," and all other applicable codes and regulations. As proposed, and recommended by staff, the preliminary plat is consistent with the FWCP and all applicable codes and regulations, provided the proposed accompanying Concomitant Agreement is adopted concurrently. 24. Prior to final plat approval and recording, all required and approved improvements will be constructed, or the improvements appropriately bonded, per City code requirements. XII RECOMMENDATION Based on review of this application, environmental record, and pertinent decisional criteria, the Department of Community Development Services recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: Under the terms of the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement, approval of a new Concomitant Agreement is required concurrent with approval of the preliminary plat on parcel 192104-9044. Therefore, the associated proposed Concomitant Agreement must be adopted concurrent with approval of the preliminary plat. Prior to proceeding with plat infrastructure construction, the applicant shall provide a revised landscape plan that includes the following landscaping to be approved by the City: A. Arterial buffer landscaping in Tract C per FWCC Section 20-178; B. Street trees in right-of-way landscape planter strips per Public Works Department Standards; C. Landscaping of Tracts D and H with vegetation including trees, shrubs, and groundcover, to provide a visual separation between the public right-of-way and the proposed stormwater facilities. These landscape tracts shall be owned and maintained by the homeowners' association. The landscape tracts shall be developed with Type III landscaping. If cyclone fencing is used around the storm drainage ponds, the fencing shall be coated black or green. D. 'Restoration and landscaping of slopes resulting from clearing, grading, and construction roadways. Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03-102630-00-SU / Doc ►D29393 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 16 E. Significant tree retention and protection in compliance with FWCC standards. F. Landscaping adjacent to proposed retaining walls on lots 5 — 9. 3. Based on the August 19, 2004 recommendations from Berquist Engineering Services, the final plat map shall note that all building foundations shall be setback from retaining walls a distance equal to the height of the wall. Based on December 15, 2003 recommendations in the Berquist report, and April 15, 2004 amendment, buildings on lots 19, 20, and 45 shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the top of the slope that exceeds 10 feet vertical height. Design and construction of the project shall comply with all requirements and recommendations of the Berquist Engineering analysis and reports dated December 15, 2003 and April 15, 2004. 4. Prior to final plat approval, as required by Metro, the applicant shall design and construct a bus stop shelter footing and bus stop landing in accordance with King County Metro standards for the site frontage along SW Campus Drive. Prior to construction, the applicant shall provide approval of the landing design and location from Metro. 5. The final plat map shall include a note to the following effect: Due to the proposed multi -family development on Lot 45, open space on lot 45 was not provided with the subdivision. Open space on lot 45 must meet the greater requirement of the Federal Way Subdivision code requirement of 15 percent gross open space, or the multi -family open space/recreation area requirements of FWCC Section 22-667. Review and approval of the lot 45 open space will occur in conjunction with permitting and development on lot 45. Open space on lot 45 shall be provided on -site and in accordance with provisions of FWCC Section.22-667, note 2. 6. If included in the final engineering design, retaining walls and rockeries designs shall be harmonious with the residential use of the site and shall promote residential design themes through such means as terracing, orientation, natural material selection, use of vegetation, and textural treatment to be designed by the applicant and approved by the Community Development Services Department. XIII LIST OF EXHIBITS 1. Wynstone preliminary plat map, revised May 10, 2004 (sheet 1 of 1); along with the Wynstone Preliminary Roads, Drainage and Utilities Plan (sheet 1 of 1), revised October 20, 2004; Wynstone Preliminary Grading Plan dated revised October 20, 2004; Wynstone Preliminary Grading Plan Cross Sections dated November 20, 2004; Wynstone Preliminary Plat Road Profiles sheets 1-3 dated revised December 10, 2003; Wynstone Existing Tree Plan by Jaeger Engineering dated March 14, 2003 sheet 1 of 1; and Wynstone Preliminary Landscape Plan by Eagle Design dated April 23, 2003 2. Master Land Use application for Wynstone Preliminary Plat application 3. SEPA MDNS, September 1, 2004 4. SEPA Checklist for Wynstone, dated revised August 20, 2004 5. Metro Transit comment letter, September 14, 2004 6. Geotechnical Exploration Evaluation by Berquist Engineering Services, December 15, 2003 7. Berquist Engineering Services letter, April 15, 2004 8. Berquist Engineering Services letter, August 19, 2004 9. Wetland Assessment by Habitat Technologies, April 8, 2003 10. Clearing and Grading Request from Brad Plemmons, November 23, 2004 11. Traffic Impact Analysis, revised March 31, 2004, by Christopher Brown & Assoc. Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03-102630-00-SU / D.. ro 29393 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 17 12. Federal Way Public Schools comment letter, May 21, 2003 13. Certificate of Sewer Availability by Lakehaven Utility District, May 22, 2003 14. Certificate of Water Availability by Lakehaven Utility District, May 22, 2003 15. Preliminary Storm Water Technical Information Report (TIR), by Jaeger Engineering, November 2003 Note: Copies of exhibits are not attached to all copies of this report. All exhibits have been provided to the Hearing Examiner. TRANSMITTED TO THE PARTIES LISTED HEREAFTER: Federal Way Hearing Examiner Applicant Applicant Agent — Jaeger Engineering Wynstone Preliminary Plat 03-102630-00-SU / Doc ro 29393 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 18 CITY OF "-�'" Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-661-4000; Fax 253-661-4129 www,C tvoffecleralway_cam DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I C, St-x0ka hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: - ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance-(SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter O Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or /Posted to or at each of the attached addresses on ►Iliar�}il 11" Project Name PfPilMl nrid C-LA File Number(s) Q - ! -.z - Signature . Date P� a 4 i— K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Dislribulion.dochast p.-led 02/19/2003 10:30 AM Posted Locations Federal Way Regional Library — 34200 lst Way South, Federal Way, WA 2. Federal Way 320th Branch Library — 848 South 320th Street, Federal Way, WA 3. Federal Way City Hall — 33325 8th Ave South, Federal Way, WA 4. Three Updates On Site— SW Campus Drive and loth Avenue SW, Federal Way, WA a. SW Campus Drive and loth Avenue SW b. 340'h SW and Driveway to Saghalie Park c. 12th Avenue SW at the North End of Orchid Lane CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE PUBLIC HEARING Wynstone Preliminary Plat and CZA Amendment Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner at 9:00 a.m., or soon thereafter, on December 14, 2004, in Federal Way City Council Chambers (33325 81n Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003) for the following project: Name: Wynstone Preliminary Plat File Nos: 03-102630-00-SU and 03-102632-00-UP Topic: The proposed action includes subdividing approximately 13.5 acres into 45 separate lots. Proposed lots numbered 1— 44 are for single-family use and range in size from 5,000 square feet to 17,185 square feet. Lot number 45 is for multi -family development and is approximately one acre in size. The proposal also includes developing an internal road system, street frontage improvements on Campus Drive SW, construction of 10"'112h SW through the site, traffic signal modifications at the - intersection of 101h Avenue SW and Campus Drive, utility construction, storm drainage control improvements, and other related infrastructure improvements. The proposed action also includes amending the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement for a portion of the site. Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," the Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing on.the preliminary plat application and concomitant zoning agreement and forward a recommendation to the Federal Way City Council. Location: The subject property is located along the south side of SW Campus Drive at the intersection of 10t1i Avenue SW. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 121h Avenue SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, Washington, King County tax parcel numbers 192104-9044 and 192104-9030, in the NW '/4 of Section 19, T21N, R4E, WM. Applicant: Brad Plemmons, Brad Plemmons Enterprises, 101 T Street SE, Auburn, WA 98002 Application Received: June 6, 2003 Application Determined Complete: September 10, 2003 Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner either by delivering comments to the Department of Community Development Services before the hearing; by giving them directly to the Hearing Examiner at the hearing; or by appearing at the hearing and presenting public testimony in person, or through a representative. The Hearing Examiner will issue a recommendation on the preliminary plat application and concomitant zoning agreement amendment within 10 working days after the close of the hearing. The applications are to be reviewed under all applicable codes, regulations, and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official file is available for review during working hours in the Department of Community Development Services, 33325 8(h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. The staff report to the Hearing Examiner will be available for review one week before the hearing. Questions regarding this proposal should be directed to Senior Planner Jim Harris at 253-835-2641, or jim.harris@cityoffederalwgy.com. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on November 27, 2004. T 5 A 4 rr (TilkAll n;f C N > C> C; o o tz, ' uq, A, -z0,2 t 5 o.9 r A, • —BRAD —pEA4A40NS WYNSTONE JAEGER ENGINEERING ,a, rs, v PRELIMINARY PLAT PLAN 9419 South 204th Ploce 'u.". K-t. VIA. 9603Y '169: l2t� AK. SW & SW 3381h SF. — No 6 7o r., N"(253) 850-0934 (253) 650-of55 m r Cn C= ED FEDERAL WAY M mIOR - Your Community Newspaper - Affidavit of Publication Debbie Kaufman, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a semi -weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a semi -weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained at the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way L-811 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 27th day of November 2004 , and ending on the 27th day of November, 20� both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 12$ b._16 which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.090 Subscribed to and sworn before me this 29th day of November,_ 2004. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way �llllItIIIII1f1 r�1 rtttf�tf����rrr�lts ti�,',�,t` 1414 SO. 324TH STREET, SUITE B210, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 ■ 253-925-5565 0 FAX: 253-925-5750 CITY of Ft=DE AY NOTICE OF LAND USE PML UBLIC REARING Wynstone Preliminary Plat and CZA Amendment Notice is hereby given that a public hearingwill be lr the aaresnygExamiat 9:0m., of Federal the►eaf- ter, on December 14, 2004 in Federal Way City Council Chambers (33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 980Q8) for the fol- lowing project: Name: Wynstone Preliminary Plat File Nos: 03-102630-00-SU and 03- 102632-00-UP Topto. The proposed action includes subdi- viding approximately 13.5 acres into 45 sep- arate lots. Proposed lots numbered 1 . A4 are for single-family use and range in size from 5,000 square feet to 17,185 sqquare feet. Lot number 45 is for multi-tamly devel- opment and is approximately one acre in size. The proposal also includes developing an imarnal road system, street frontage im- provements on Campus drive SW, con- struction of 10th112th SW through the site, traffic signal modifications at the intersection of loth Avenue SW and Campus Drive, utility construction, storm drainage control im- provements, and other related infrastructure improvements. The proposed action also in- cludes amending the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement for a portion of the site. Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, "Subdivisionshe," the Hearing Ex- aminer will hold a public aring on the pre- liminary plat application and concomitant zoning agreement and forward a recom- mendation to the Federal Way city Council. Location: The subject & opertypp is located along the south s Drive at the i tersection oft oth Avenue e of SW. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 12th Av- enue SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, Washington, King County tax parcel numbers 192104-9044 and 192104-9030, in the NW 114 of Section 19, T21 N, R4E, WM. Applicant: Brad Plemmons, Brad Plemmons Enterprises, 101 T Street SE, Auburn, WA 98002 Application Received: June 6, 2003 Application Determined Complete: Sep- tember 10, 2003 Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner either by delivering comments to the Department of Community Development Services before the hearing; by giving them directly to the Hearing Exam- iner at the hearing; or by appearing at the hearing and presenting public testimony in person, or through a representative. The Hearing Examiner wM issue a recommenda- tion on the preliminary plat application and concomitant zoning agreement amendment within 10 working days after the Close of the hearing. The applications are to be reviewed under all applicable codes regulations, and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official file is available for review during working hours in the Department of Commu- nitY Development Services, 33325 8th Ave- nue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. The staff report to the Hearing Examiner will be availaable for review one �veregard- mg rore the posa! should he Questions Planner Jim Harris at 253-835-2641, of i m. harrisM0.811 @cilyoffedPra Iway. corn. F Publlshed on November 27, 2004. 4ik CITY Federalo, Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 Eighth Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.c i t vof f edera Tway. com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I=- hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination .of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed �e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on r 93 .2004. Project Name File Number(s) Signature — K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 10/8/2004 8:08 AM Date �/ �� CITY OF - Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE PUBLIC HEARING Wynstone Preliminary Plat and CZA Amendment Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner at 9:00 a.m., or soon thereafter, on December 14, 2004, in l"ederal Way City Council Chambers (33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003) for the following project: Name: Wynstone Preliminary Plat File Nos: 03-102630-00-SU and 03-102632-00-UP Topic: The proposed action includes subdividing approximately 13.5 acres into 45 separate lots. Proposed lots numbered 1 — 44 are for single-family use and range in size from 5,000 square feet to 17,185 square feet. Lot number 45 is for multi -family development and is approximately one acre in size. The proposal also includes developing an internal road system, street frontage improvements on Campus Drive SW, construction of 10"'/12th SW through the site, traffic signal modifications at the intersection of 10'h Avenue SW and Campus Drive, utility construction, storm drainage control improvements, and other related infrastructure improvements. The proposed action also includes amending the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement for a portion of the site. Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," the Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing on the preliminary plat application and concomitant zoning agreement and forward a recommendation to the Federal Way City Council. Location: The subject property is located along the south side of SW Campus Drive at the intersection of 101h Avenue SW. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 12th Avenue SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, Washington, King County tax parcel numbers 192104-9044 and 192104-9030, in the NW 1/4 of Section 19, T21N, R4E, WM. Applicant: Brad Plemmons, Brad Plemmons Enterprises, 101 T Street SE, Auburn, WA 98002 Application Received: June 6, 2003 Application Determined Complete: September 10, 2003 Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner either by delivering comments to the Department of Community Development Services before the hearing; by giving them directly to the Hearing Examiner at the hearing; or by appearing at the hearing and presenting public testimony in person, or through a representative. The Hearing Examiner will issue a recommendation on the preliminary plat application and concomitant zoning agreement amendment within 10 working days after the close of the hearing. The applications are to be reviewed under all applicable codes, regulations, and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official file is available for review during working hours in the Department of Community Development Services, 33325 8th Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. The staff report to the Hearing Examiner will be available for review one week before the hearing. Questions regarding this proposal should be directed to Senior Planner Jim Harris at 253-835-2641, or iim.harris ci ❑iTederalwa .com. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on November 27, 2004. Page 1 of 1 Tina Piety - Legal Notices From: Tina Piety To: admin@fedwaymirror.com; dgrigg@soundpublishing.com Date: 11 /23/2004 8:52 AM Subject: Legal Notices Hello, Please publish the attached legal notices (Ambulatory Surgery MDNS, 04-102138-00-SE; and Wynstone Public Hearing, 03-102630-00-SU) in Saturday's (11/27/04) issue. Please furnish an affidavit of publication. Thank you, Tina file://C:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\tinap\Local%2OSettings\Temp\GW) OOOO1.HTM 11/23/2004 From: Teryl Heller <admin@fedwaymirror.com> To: "Tina Piety"<Tina.Piety@cityoffederalway.com> Date: 11 /23/2004 8:59:18 AM Subject: Re: Legal Notices Hi Tina: Got your two legals --- thanks!!!! They will be in the 11/27/04 issue. Hope you have a lovely Thanksgiving!!!! Teryl On Nov 23, 2004, at 8:52 AM, Tina Piety wrote: > <Ambulatory Surgery MDNS.DOC> 41k CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cilyoffederalway.co.m DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION l hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ;14 Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ¢mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2004. Project Name File Number(s) Signature Date r� o K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 11 /29/2004 2:55 PM CITY OF - Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE PUBLIC HEARING Wynstone Preliminary Plat and CZA Amendment Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner at 9:00 a.m., or soon thereafter, on December 14, 2004, in Federal Way City Council Chambers (33325 8�h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003) for the following project: Name: Wynstone Preliminary Plat File Nos: 03-102630-00-SU and 03-102632-00-UP Topic: The proposed action includes subdividing approximately 13.5 acres into 45 separate lots. Proposed lots numbered 1 — 44 are for single-family use and range in size from 5,000 square feet to 17,185 square feet. Lot number 45 is for multi -family development and is approximately one acre in size. The proposal also includes developing an internal road system, street frontage improvements on Campus Drive SW, construction of 10"712"' SW through the site, traffic signal modifications at the intersection of IO'h Avenue SW and Campus Drive, utility construction, stone drainage control improvements, and other related infrastructure improvements. The proposed action also includes amending the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement for a portion of the site. Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," the Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing on the preliminary plat application and concomitant zoning agreement and forward a recommendation to the Federal Way City Council. Location: The subject property is located along the south side of SW Campus Drive at the intersection of 10`h Avenue SW. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 12`h Avenue SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, Washington, King County tax parcel numbers 192104-9044 and 192104-9030, in the NW 1/4 of Section 19, T21N, R4E, WM. Applicant: Brad Plemmons, Brad Plemmons Enterprises, 101 T Street SE, Auburn, WA 98002 Application Received: June 6, 2003 Application Determined Complete: September 10, 2003 Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner either by delivering comments to the Department of Community Development Services before the hearing; by giving them directly to the Hearing Examiner at the hearing; or by appearing at the hearing and presenting public testimony in person, or through a representative. The Hearing Examiner will issue a recommendation on the preliminary plat application and concomitant zoning agreement amendment within 10 working days after the close of the hearing. The applications are to be reviewed under all applicable codes, regulations, and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official file is available for review during working hours in the Department of Community Development Services, 33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. The staff report to the Hearing Examiner will be available for review one week before the hearing. Questions regarding this proposal should be directed to Senior Planner Jim Harris at 253-835-2641, or jim.harris@61yoffederalwa .com. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on November 27, 2004. I 9910-0 9 (f.Z) -aN xod 0L19-6fa V; roj 9 15 478Cf MS a MS 'dnv 41Z1 1691-6f6 �Siri :avoyd c a bE60-OSB (fSZ) 'ON auoyd • n ^ /COB6 •VMI uaN Z0086 VM 'NtlIIBCIM - a=old 96 ' m 'lu 61b6 l.. NV�d 1V7d AdVNIWl�321d 3s ss i m1 0NI?���NI�NT 2�:io3v 3NOlSNIM SNOWW37d OV28 e y a a d o ao 23 q ¢�oz�rn'z''z3o a� ii,`�,"G �� w b ..000 w''' o, aJ�Yoc�o Uzo"'o��ho `� Gi < o o� N Fw. w�.. QW-o.^ u�`ry �ow o z o oa_aN oo z a"o d<¢a zowwwm ��¢pwe tom = Gym �. . rr 6:'•r ae<a 2�aa a 1n3vi��wu zaa u / • ;rrf �' • i `mQi�c�i �U2 zn. i Y cn P At G r, ' C11 q=_ � ` • �. i'_ a� aX., J/ _ - t • R r.'y1 j/. ��Y. mg m� �g m8 4 u�� �- y- er IL v 12fh PL. SW - •\.- .ate - _._ _- s �$ .x ac x �r � a � � I C� m 6'o ` ■r am 1—� p' �. •`. nx q , VAIR lit c� rr gr k F m w iqa� w r 1n a '- i CV C a£ e :1 � .x _ t ■ i � �q"a _ '. �� R a1 p� _ a. r ao------------ o gall ro �Ae R$ieR � � � .W1• I � k � ��T � � £;'r<tl��s Je=W��,,�,, 0�'3�"' E�Y.fiY�..r C�.'�r?.'• i . :f ���raal�".�r•���d�� Y� a€%'�'� ��aa��b^ �, _ N � � 4i�a' I �? N F aR�k�$ rah ua gg Sti < N�4 awR�$fiR n /; OT o SW.`ff s� �'y5�¢s WKVg=.�D IJ sa o ° a�:a �� s., Flip o@t Sa ---- ra < T 4E``�'k �NPo I .?�+ • GPI ('. ,`'r Vie','-^. ? ,•�k R • ,# 1 MetroScan King ----------- __ •-, / ----_-.:__------__-___- ._ -4F Owner :Glen Park Associates Llc Parcel # :192104 9005 06 Site :1002 SW Campus Dr Federal Way Sale Date :07/27/2000 Mail :2150 N 107th St #370 Seattle Wa 98133 Sale Price :$31,686,000 Full Use :011 Res,Apartment Asd.V :$15,842,000 e-- Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 5 N 1/2 OF NW Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 B1dgSF:274,063 Ac:16.82 YB:1989 Ph: # 2 *---------------------:. MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Campus Grove L1c;Born Lloyd W Parcel # :192104 9006 05 Site :33715 loth Ave SW Federal Way Sale Date :01/11/2000 Mail :PO Box 178 Bow Wa 98232 Sale Price Use :011 Res,Apartment Asd.V :$6,968,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 6 POR GL 1 SEC Q:NW, 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 B1dgSF:149,534 Ac:6.86 YBT1990 Ph: # 3 __ *----- _----------___ _ MetroScan / King : ------------------------------ * Owner :Klak Golf Llc Parcel # :192104 9008 03 Site :700 SW Campus Dr Federal Way Sale Date :10/11/2000 Mail :122 S Michigan Ave #1000 Chicago Il 60603 Sale Price :$850,000 Use :301 Vacant,Multi-family Asd.V :$2,341,700 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 8 SE 1/4 OF NW Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:17.92 YB: Ph: # 4 *--------------------- . MetroScan / King :---------------------------------* Owner :Papke Daniel P/Susan D;++ Parcel # :192104 9019 00 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :07/03/2001 Mail :PO Box 3649 Federal Way Wa 98063_ Sale Price :$160,000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$156,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 19 S 1/5 OF GL 2 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:4.53 YB: Ph: # 5 *------------ Y-- MetroScan / King • ------------------------------- Owner :Nelson John & Jo Ellen Parcel # :192104 9024 03 Site * :*no Site Address Federal Way Sale Date :07/08/1986 f Mail :PO Box 3229 Federal Way Wa 98063 Sale Price :$11,000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$46,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 24 W 160 FT OF S Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:1.04 YB: Ph: # 6 *---------------------: MetroScan / King :__-----------------------------* Owner :Omega International Investment Corporati Parcel # :192104 9025 02 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :11/22/1999 Mail :16622 178th Ave NE Woodinville Wa 98072 Sale Price :$227,500 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$54,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 25 N 250 FT OF W Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.89 YB: Ph: # 7 --------------------- MetroScan / King :---------- -------------------* Owner :Nelson John & Joellen Parcel # :192104 9026 01 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date / Mail :PO Box 3229 Federal Way Wa 98063 Sale Price V Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$44,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 26 BEG 412 FT S Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.90 YB: Ph: # g *---------------------: MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Parcel # :192104 9027 00 Owner :Pei-yi Corporation Sale Date :08/18/1989 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way 98023 Sale Price :$430,000 Mail :246 SW 325th Pl Federal Way Wa Asd.V :$259,000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 27 POR GL 2 BEG Ph: Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:8.77 YB: # 9 MetroScan / King •-------- # ------------* 9028 09 Owner :Crow Willard S Parcel :192104 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date Mail :3803 120th Ave SE Bellevue Wa 98006 Sale Price Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$100 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 28 S 30 FT OF N Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.19 YB: Ph:425-746-50fi4 Information compitedfrom various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or ivarrandes as to die accuracy or coutpleteness of information conrained in this report. r. . #.10 -------------- --. MetroScan / King ------ __._________________* Owner :Weisman Steven I Parcel # :192104 9031 04 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :05/22/1991 Mail :PO Box 16 King Cove Ak 99612 Sale Price :$122,500 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$54,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 31 S 162 FT OF N Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.65 YB: Ph: # 11 *----------- -- MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Nelson John & Joellen Parcel # :192104 9032 03 Site :1530 SW 341st P1 Federal Way 98023 Sale Date Mail :PO Box 3229 Federal Way Wa 98063 Sale Price Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$98,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 32 S 162 FT OF N Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:960 Ac:.46 YB:-1938 Ph: # 12 *--------------------- • MetroScan / King • ---------- ---=----------------* Owner :Federal Way Public Schools Parcel # :192104 9033 02 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :10/19/1984 Mail :31405 18th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$757,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 33 W 335.76 FT Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:9.82 YB: Ph: # 13 ------- MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Klak Federal Way Llc Parcel # :192104 9043 00 Site' :702 SW Campus Dr Federal Way Sale Date :10/11/2000 Mail :122 S Michigan Ave #1000 Chicago Il 60603 Sale Price :$850,000 Full Use :301 Vacant,Multi-family Asd.V :$588,900 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 43 POR OF GL-1 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:4.51 YB: Ph: # 14 --------------------- MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :City Of Federal Way Parcel # :192104 9050 00 Site :1100 NE Campus Pkwy Seattle 98105 Sale Date :09/25/1991 Mail :33530 1st Way S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$1,452,600 Use :301 Vacant,Multi-family Asd.V :$1,757,400 , Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 50 POR GL 1 STR Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:16.14 YB: Ph: # 15 *---------------------: MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Fed Way School Dist #210 Parcel # :192104 9052 08 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :06/23/1994 Mail :31405 18th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$66,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 52 POR OF SW 1/4 Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:1.34 YB: Ph: # 16 ---- MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Fed Way School Dist #210 Parcel # :192104 9053 07 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date Mail :31405 18th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :000 *unknown Use Code* Asd.V :$31,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 53 POR OF SW 1/4 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:1.09 YB: Ph; # 17 *-------------• MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* 03 Owner :Fortman William C/Katherine G Parcel # :242103 9051 Site :1605 SW 341st P1 Federal Way 98023 Sale Date :12/01/1997 E-- Mail :1605 SW 341st P1 Federal Way Wa 98023 Sale Price :$215,000 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$202,000 Lgl :STR 242103 TAXLOT 51 S 412 1/3 FT Stories:l S1dgSF:1,230 Q:NE 5:24 Ac:2.50 YB:1949 T:21N R:03E Ph:253-661-0421 Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/l / / King • _---------------------------. -----* #. 18 *----------»----------- MetroScan ' Owner :Omega International Investment Corporati Parcel # :242103 9053 01 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :11/22/1999 4� Mail :16622 178th Ave NE Woodinville Wa 98072 Sale Price :$227,500 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$98,000 Lgl :STR 242103 TAXLOT 53 E 264 FT OF N Q:NE S:24 T:21N R:03E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:1.89 YB: Ph: Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. ' MetroScan / King Site Address YBOwner Phone Parcel # Owner Name Y ` ^ ___ 192104Y 9005 v Glen Park Associates L1c1002 SW Campus Dr Federal W 1989 1990 192104 9006 Campus Grove L1c;Born Lloy 33715 loth Ave SW Federal W 192104 9008 Klak Golf Llc 700 SW Campus Dr Federal Wa 192104 9019 Papke Daniel P/Susan D;+ *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9024 Nelson John & Jo Ellen *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9025 Omega International Invest *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9026 Nelson John & Joellen *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9027 Pei-yi Corporation *no Site Address* Federal W 425-746-5074 192104-9028 Crow Willard S *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9031 Weisman Steven I *no Site Address* Federal-W 192104 9032 Nelson John & Joellen 1530 SW 341st Pl Federal Wa 1938 192104 9033 Federal Way Public Schools *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9043 Klak Federal Way Llc 702 SW Campus Dr Federal Wa 192104 9050 City Of Federal Way 1100 NE Campus Pkwy Seattle 192104 9052 Fed Way School Dist #210 *no Site Address* Federal W 192104 9053 Fed Way School Dist #210 *no Site Address* 341st Pl Federal Federal W Wa 1949 253-661-0421 242103 9051 Fortman William C/Katherin 1605 SW 242103 9053 Omega International Invest *no Site Address* Federal W WJ pi S �Gt Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of itaformation contained in this report. nu �uv w �a me KING COUNTY DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS KC 1689 NW 19-21-4 SCALE- 1"= [W 7 ,c. RECEIVED jUN 2 6 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. m m - u V1MS 9¢ZF0QJ' S 3r��~CFtiA/.,V WZ0wj-�W�3l [ 'JdNp��Nfr f, SSLO-OS9 (CSZ) ON -j oC60-099(£SZ)'ON aoyd 4 LiO96 tlM .)aJL NV7d 1Vid ,aVN H mf 90v 3S S 101 i 0wy�o'P�2a101-99UN2�o=n�6-�6-9�J�omc¢U0i ^ JNI2JA3NIJN� 2J3J3vf s3NO1SNAM NOww33d ovyad a a i E an dw�2plwvInLn rrV(ry�}^^��' Q4 VPaw¢[aY Wt�xwOaD_ W4xw(�aY N p 9e ¢�N �'-_ gFA2:{ hQ 0O�oMi 0, lj w2l4 W n O�o¢aw8+ ySvet�!!"i/ Lr� 1 Z . 0 T- LU�'1uU�oP3o6=Z_O9[ o0oz �� Q tom0.. 0i/i '�• O Z5zi _ ams' I ;'qti' + 5•rN', �Se��In� o i2aa tV rf.Zw,��f 2OOO2a H3-A 0i f, "¢ �Q , Ya gq QJ � •' •r YJ cn 2 u Y oo- PC 1`2th PL SW '� r a •Ys I ` _ � � � �g I r JJ w L j � I } 'S �/ ti f � • I c� .4y,A. *Vw ggY O 'eml Y° NX s?f I , N : 1 � 5 +9 ¢, R. fi r x w >:�� Y�� i Ina __ a?4g W y Y`'{.y. z ri8 pm N fin 2 TX44 bb jR •� -i I._.•._ —_. ... __ ....... .�. _ f pG�-.L .' I o] J O Y °�_• a -'" it •FSc=!yb�I ■`w4 �r M ICI Icr- -------------- 'xd=9bLlt Yin'��. C��b. '� a�S ,., g^. •1n i �3 6 p��� o q�..�$7�qU^ Z a 9E J a�sYr• Lr'� s~yy�` ��dag� a =Ir INMP g'�X� �x 4�€= $" •gg� B LJ� : ��'' CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE PUBLIC HEARING Wynstone Preliminary Plat and CZA Amendment Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner at 9:00 a.m., or soon thereafter, on December 14, 2004, in Federal Way City Council Chambers (33325 Bch Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003) for the following project: Name: Wynstone Preliminary Plat File Nos: 03-102630-00-SU and 03-102632-00-UP Topic: The proposed action includes subdividing approximately 13.5 acres into 45 separate lots. Proposed lots numbered 1 — 44 are for single-family use and range in size from 5,000 square feet to 17,185 square feet. Lot number 45 is for multi -family development and is approximately one acre in size. The proposal also includes developing an internal road system, street frontage improvements on Campus Drive SW, construction of 10°ill2lh SW through the site, traffic signal modifications at the intersection of 10"' Avenue SVIW and Campus Drive, utility construction, storm drainage control improvements, and other related infrastructure improvements. The proposed action also includes amending the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement for a portion of the site. Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," the Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing on the preliminary plat application and concomitant zoning agreement and forward a recommendation to the Federal Way City Council. Location: The subject property is located along the south side of SW Campus Drive at the intersection of 10`h Avenue SW. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 12`h Avenue SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, Washington, King County tax parcel numbers 192104-9044 and 192104-9030, in the NW'/4 of Section 19, T21N, R4E, WM. Applicant: Brad Plemmons, Brad Plemmons Enterprises, 101 T Street SE, Auburn, WA 98002 Application Received: June 6, 2003 Application Determined Complete: September 10, 2003 Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner either by delivering comments to the Department of Community Development Services before the hearing; by giving them directly to the Hearing Examiner at the hearing; or by appearing at the hearing and presenting public testimony in person, or through a representative. The Hearing Examiner will issue a recommendation on the preliminary plat application and concomitant zoning agreement amendment within 10 working days after the close of the hearing. The applications are to be reviewed under all applicable codes, regulations, and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official file is available for review during working hours in the Department of Community Development Services, 33325 81h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. The staff report to the Hearing Examiner will be available for review one week before the hearing. Questions regarding this proposal should be directed to Senior Planner Jim Harris at 253-835-2641, or jim,harris(c4ciiyoffederalway.com. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on November 27, 2004. 13 Brad Plemmons Enterprises Inc. 101 T.S. S.E. AUBURN, WA. 98002 0 4 - 10 Z 6 3 0 Office: 206-293-1434 Fax: (253)-939-6170 November 23, 2004 Mr. Jim Harris, Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98063 Re: Wynstone mass grade and fill request. To whom it may concern, RESUBMITTED NOV 2 4 2004 I am providing a written request and justification to clear and grade beyond the right of way and utility areas. Due to Wynstone's unique topography, extensive infrastructure and sizable off site grading easement, mass clearing and grading will be necessary in order to align the 10t' - 12'h corridor with S.W. Campus Dr. and construct 12 pl. S.W. approximately 35,000 cubic yards of existing material will need to be removed in order to establish street sub -grades. This will effect the majority of tax parcel number 192104-9044 as well as the eastern quarter of tax parcel 192104-9030. The intersection of 10`b-l2`h S.W. and 339'h S.W. and 12t' pl. S.W. requires an 11 foot fill approximately 15,000 cubic yards of material to establish the intersection road sub -grade. In order to construct Wynstone's streets material will need to be placed or removed well beyond the right of way or utility area boundaries. This request is to ensure that specific areas of the proposed plat make appropriate provisions for public health, safety, and general welfare. Specific mass clearing and grading areas will be required in order to ensure slope stabilization, erosion control. Sincerely, Br on t r' rad emmons Enterprises Inc. HLSUb:' t T T ED N 0 V 2 4 2004 Brad Ple'tnmons Enterprises Ine. 101 T.S. S.E. AUBURN, WA. 98002 Office: 206-293-1434 Fax: (253)-939-6170 0 4 -102 6 3 0 November 23, 2004 Mr. Jim Harris, Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33325 8 h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98063 Re: Wynstone mass grade and fill request. To whom it may concern, I am providing a written request and justification to clear and grade beyond the right of way and utility areas. Due to Wynstone's unique topography, extensive infrastructure and sizable off site grading easement, mass clearing and grading will be necessary in order to align the 10t' - ffh corridor with S.W. Campus Dr. and construct 12 pl. S.W. approximately 35,000 cubic yards of existing material will need to be removed in order to establish street sub -grades. This will effect the majority of tax parcel number 192104-9044 as well as the eastern quarter of tax parcel 192104-9030. The intersection of 10`h-12t' S.W. and 339t' S.W. and 12'b pl. S.W. requires an 11 foot fill approximately 15,000 cubic yards of material to establish the intersection road sub -grade - In order to construct Wynstone's streets material will need to be placed or removed well beyond the right of way or utility area boundaries. This request is to ensure that specific areas of the proposed plat make appropriate provisions for public health, safety, and general welfare. Specific mass clearing and grading areas will be required in order to ensure slope stabilization, erosion control. Sincerely, Br;mons on �� Enterprises Inc. CITY QF' CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063 9718 �. Federal Way (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com November 19, 2004 HAND DELIVERED Mr. Brad Plemmons 101 T Street SE Auburn, WA 98002 Re: File No. 03-102632-00-UP - Wynstone — Parcel 5B Concomitant Agreement and Development Agreement Draft Dear Mr. Plemmons: Enclosed is the first draft Concomitant Agreement and Development Agreement for Parcel 5B. In order to achieve a public hearing on the preliminary plat and Concomitant Agreement and Development Agreement on December 14"', as you have requested, City staff will need to be in general agreement with you regarding the terms of the new agreement by November 22, 2004. Therefore, please provide me any written comments on the draft agreement by the end of the day Monday, November 22, 2004. If you request major substantive changes to the draft agreement, we will not likely be able to conduct a public hearing in December due to procedural requirements, such as: revising the draft agreement; public hearing notice distribution; and staff report preparation. Second, since you are the contract purchaser of Parcel 513 as identified in the June 18, 2003, "Notice of Interest in Property," the City is not distributing the draft agreement to the current property owner. Please note that only the vested owner of the property may enter into the agreement with the City. At the time of execution and signature of the agreement, verification of ownership of the property, as well as valid signature authority, will be required. Approval of the associated Wynstone Preliminary Plat application under City file No 03-102630-SU will be contingent upon execution and recording of the concomitant agreement and development agreement. If you have any questions, please contact me at 253 835-2641. Sincerely, Avt'" 2H Senior Planner Enclosure c: Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services Rick Perez, Traffic Engineer Greg Fewins, Deputy Director of CDS Will Appleton, Development Services Manager Cary Roe, Public Works Director Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Ken Miller, Deputy Public Works Director Amy Jo Pearsall, Assistant City Attorney Doc. LD 29668 DRAFT 11-19-2004 CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND POLYGON FOR DEVELOPMENT OF WYNSTONE PROPERTY DECEMBER _, 2004 The City of Federal Way ("City") and Polygon 2000, Inc., ("Polygon"), a Washington corporation, collectively referred to herein as "the Parties", enter into the following concomitant agreement and development agreement ("Agreement") replacing an earlier concomitant agreement, changing the allowed use under that earlier agreement, and defining the necessary right'of--way improvements associated with the development of a parcel of property, specifically described below in Section 2 ("Property"). WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way, Washington, a non -charter optional municipal code city incorporated under the laws of Washington, has authority to enact laws and enter into agreements to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its citizens and thereby control the use and development of property within its jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, a concomitant agreement was entered into between the City and Polygon in February 1990 regarding the zoning of Campus Crest Property Parcel 5, which included the Property subject to this Agreement; and WHEREAS, an amendment to the 1990 concomitant agreement via Resolution 93-128 split the Campus Crest Property Parcel 5 into two parcels referred to as Parcel 5A and 5B and removed parcel 5A from the terms of the 1990 concomitant agreement; and WHEREAS, an additional amendment to the 1990 concomitant agreement via Resolution 93-144 altered the original conditions applicable to Parcel 5B; and WHEREAS, various terms of the 1990 concomitant agreement as amended are no longer applicable to the proposed use and development of Parcel 5B, now known as the Property subject to this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the developer of Polygon's Property desires to develop the Property in a manner different than what is allowed in the 1990 concomitant agreement as amended and has initiated a discussion with the City with respect to amending the 1990 concomitant agreement; and WHEREAS, both Parties agree that a new Agreement is appropriate; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to preserve its rights under the 1990 concomitant agreement as amended, including development being restricted to residential use, predetermined setbacks, maximum density requirements, and right-of-way improvements; and DRAFT 11-19-2004 WHEREAS, both Parties seek clarification regarding the construction of the 10th Avenue SW extension and SW Campus Drive improvements; and WHEREAS, the City has authority under RCW 36:70B.170 - .210 to enter into a development agreement to delineate mitigation that will be required as a part of the Project; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and obligations set forth herein, it is hereby covenanted and agreed by and between the Parties hereto as follows: 1. Description of Agreement. This Agreement is both a concomitant agreement and a development agreement. The concomitant agreement allows for a change in the allowed use of certain property subject to a previous concomitant agreement, as well as, development standards and conditions governing the use of the property. The development agreement provides the developer with certainty regarding the local regulations and mitigation requirements that will govern development for a specified project. The concomitant agreement is a condition to and limitation upon the change of use of the property, if adopted by the City Council. That is, if the allowed use is changed subject to concomitant agreement, its use and development is restricted both by the regulations applicable to the underlying zoning classification and the provisions of the concomitant agreement, and where development standards in the agreement are more restrictive, they govern property development. The development of the property is conditioned and limited by both the development agreement and concomitant agreement, and they have been combined into one document. This new agreement supercedes the 1990 concomitant agreement as amended by Resolutions 93-128 and 93-144 as it applied to this Property. 2. Location. Polygon is the owner of certain real property, King County tax parcel number 192104-9044, situated in Federal Way, Washington, located along the southwest side of Campus Drive at the intersection of loth Avenue SW (the "Property"). The Property is more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 3. Project Description. The Project consists of development of 44 single family lots and one acre of multi -family units as depicted on the Development Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit B (the "Plan" or "Development Plan"). The Plan encompasses a larger area of real property than is covered by this Agreement. It is the intention of the Parties that the terms of this Agreement do not apply to the entire area of real property encompassed by the Plan, but only to the Property as described in Section 2. 4. Concomitant Agreement. If the allowed use of the Property is changed from exclusive multi -family to both single-family and multi -family by the Federal Way City Council, Polygon and the City agree that the Property may be developed only in accordance with the standards and mitigation set forth in the Agreement. The Property shall be developed as described in the Agreement, and as depicted in the Development Plan. The allowable use of the property shall be limited to that described in the Agreement. All development standards, including mitigation, identified in the Agreement shall apply to Property development. No development on the Property shall be inconsistent with the Agreement or City Code. The Property is subject to the Agreement, and shall be developed only in accordance with the development standards identified 2 DRAFT 11-19-2004 within the Agreement, including the Development Plan, unless and until the Agreement is amended or rescinded, as authorized by the City. 5. Development Agreement. The Agreement is authorized by RCW 36.70B.170 through .210 and FWCC 22-1660 through 22-1680. It addresses Project development standards, which are defined in the statute to include, for example, impact fees, mitigation, design standards, phasing issues, review procedures, vesting issues, and any other appropriate development requirements.1 The Agreement provides the City and Polygon with certainty as to the type of Project that will be built and the type of mitigation that will be provided. The Project shall be consistent with current local regulatory requirements.2 6. Development of Property. 6.1 Permitted Uses. Polygon covenants and agrees that it will limit any use of the Property to single-family and multi -family residences, as depicted in the Development Plan, attached as Exhibit B. 6.2 Relationship Between City Development Regulations and Development Standards Identified in Agreement. Development Regulations include all provisions of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC), including without limitation FWCC Chapters 18 through 22. The Agreement establishes site -specific development standards, including mitigation. Property development shall be consistent with both development regulations and the development standards identified in the Agreement. Where the development standards in the Agreement are .more restrictive, they shall govern development of the Property, as specified herein. 7. Development Standards, Including Mitigation. The Project shall be consistent with all specified development standards. Polygon shall construct, install or implement, as part of Project Construction, all mitigation required by the Agreement. 7.1 Project Desi-n and Site Configuration. 7.1.1 Permitted Development. Polygon agrees that development shall be of residences only. Both single-family and multi -family development will be permitted, but no other development will be allowed without an amendment to this Agreement. 7.1.2 Building_ Setback. All site improvements, except utilities, right-of-way improvements, and entry signage, shall be setback from SW Campus Drive a minimum of 60 feet as depicted in the Development Plan, attached as Exhibit B. 7.1.3 Maximum Density. The maximum density for the multi -family portion of the Property, as designated in the Development Plan, shall be 16-units. ' RCW 36.70B.170(3) 2 RCW 36.70B.170(1) DRAFT 11-19-2004 7.2 Right-of-wU Improvements. Polygon shall perform, as part of Project construction and prior to issuance of preliminary plat approval unless otherwise noted, the following right-of-way improvements described in the attached Exhibit C as required and approved by the Director of Public Works. 7.2.1 1 Oth Avenue SW. That portion of 101h Avenue SW located within the Property: a. Dedication of the full 70-foot Right -of -Way to the City. Right -of -Way dedication to be via Statutory Warranty Deed. Additional right-of-way, dedicated by the City Parks Department and additional slope easement, will be necessary to complete the full -width dedication to SW Campus Drive. b. Clearing and grading of the entire 70-foot right-of-way limits, required for the full street improvements, including clearing and grading outside the right-of- way, sufficient to provide a 2:1 slope, and as identified and allowed by the geo-technical report, from the westerly right-of-way to top of slope. c. Stabilization and erosion control of the graded area, outside the westerly edge of the hard -surface street improvements. d. The graded area, outside the westerly right-of-way limit shall be within a slope easement granted to the City, where needed. e. Street improvements for the east half of the right-of-way, as measured from the centerline: 18-foot paved roadway (centerline to face of curb), curb and gutter, six-foot planter strip with street trees and street lights, eight -foot sidewalk, and three-foot utility strip. f. Street improvements for the west half of the right-of-way, as measured from the centerline: six -feet of paved roadway, plus thickened -edge, and provisions for drainage. The crown of the roadway pavement shall be located at the right-of-way centerline, in anticipation of the future 36-foot pavement section. g. Asphalt roadway taper, at a 25:1 ratio, where the roadway section transitions from the 36-foot roadway section within Tax Lot 30, to the 24-foot roadway section within Tax Lot 44 (the Property). 7.2.2 SW Campus Drive. SW Campus Drive, southeast of IOth Avenue SW, along the property frontage: a. Dedication of seven feet of property to the City for right-of-way. b. Additional asphalt paving to create a twelve -foot wide left -turn pocket to access IOth Avenue SW from SW Campus Drive per City Standard Roadway Section `E', with concrete curb and gutter, six-foot planter strip with street trees and street lights, eight -foot sidewalk, and three-foot utility strip. c. Provide sufficient new roadway taper east from the widened paved edge at the easterly property boundary. Ll DRAFT 11-19-2004 7.2.3 Intersection of 10"' Avenue SW and SW Campus Drive: a. NW quadrant of intersection: extend existing curb, gutter, planter strip, and sidewalk around the radius to the southwest, terminating at the end of the curb return. This section of the new 1 Oth Avenue SW roadway, including pavement width, shall be constructed to the City's Type `M' street section. b. Asphalt paved taper, at a 25:1 ratio within the new loth Avenue SW right-of- way, from the end of the curb return, to meet the proposed 24-foot paved roadway section, described above. c. Construct City -standard handicap access ramps at the NW and SW quadrants of the intersection. d. Add channelization in SW Campus Drive to create a left turn lane onto 10`' Avenue SW, into the proposed plat. e. Revise the left turn marking for traffic on the existing leg of IOth Avenue SW so that it will be a combined thru and left turn pavement marking (WSDOT Type 3L marking). f. Channelization for the new section of loth Avenue SW would be marked for two lanes of traffic: one lane westbound, with the southerly lane allowing for thru-, left, and right -turns. g. Signal modifications, including, but not limited to, wiring and conduit, loops, new signal poles, mast arms, etc., to the existing traffic signal system to be coordinated with City Traffic Division for all required modifications. 8. Other Project Review Processes and Minor Modifications. 8.1 Other Project Review Processes. 8.1.1 Single -Family Portion. The single-family portion of the Project will be subject to preliminary plat approval, engineering plan review, final plat approval, and any other applicable review processes. The final design of the buildings and other improvements, precise location of building footprints, location of utilities, determination of access points, and other design issues will be determined during that process and must be consistent with the Agreement and the Plan. 8.1.2 Multi -Family Portion. The multi -family portion of the Project will be subject to site plan and design review pursuant to the design requirements outlined in the FWCC and any other applicable review processes. The final design of the buildings and other improvements, precise location of building footprints, location of utilities, determination of access points, and other design issues will be determined during that process and must be consistent with the Agreement and the Plan. 8.2 Modifications. Minor modifications to the Plan may be approved by the Director of Community Development Services and processed in accordance with FWCC 22-1680. Modifications that are not minor modifications are major modifications and shall require City Council approval pursuant to FWCC 22-1679. I DRAFT 11-19-2004 9. Waiver and Mutual Release of Claims of Invalidity. The City and Polygon acknowledge and represent that the terms of this Agreement have been jointly negotiated and that each party enters into this Agreement voluntarily. Further, Polygon and the City agree that this Agreement is authorized under law and each party waives any claim that the Agreement is invalid or illegal. The agreements and representations in this Section are material to this Agreement and are being relied upon by both parties. 10. General Provisions. 10.1 Binding on Successors. 10.1.1 The Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their successors in interest, and may be assigned to any successor in interest to the Project property. 10.1.2 This Agreement is intended to protect the value of, and facilitate the use and development of, the Property and to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the City. Therefore, the covenants set forth herein shall be construed to and do touch and concern the Property and the benefits and burdens inuring to Polygon and to the City from this Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon Polygon, its heirs, successors, and assigns, and upon the City. 10.2 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. Venue for any action to enforce the terms of this Agreement shall be in King County Superior Court. 10.3 Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. 10.4 Authority. The City and Polygon each represents and warrants to the other that it has the respective power and authority, and is duly authorized, to execute and deliver this Agreement and that the persons signing on its behalf are duly authorized to do so. Polygon further represents and warrants that it is the fee owner of the Property, that it has authority to agree to the covenants and provisions contained herein, and that there are no other persons, entities, or parties with any fee interest in the Property. 10.5 Amendment. This Agreement may be modified only by written instrument authorized by the City Council and duly executed by the City Manager and Polygon, and their successors and assigns consistent with FWCC 22-1679; provided, however, notwithstanding the provisions of this Agreement to the contrary, the City of Federal Way may, without the agreement of Polygon, adopt and impose upon the Property restrictions and development regulations different than those set forth herein, if required IN DRAFT 11-19-2004 by a serious threat to public health and safety. Moreover, as provided in Section 5 of the Agreement, five years after the date of the execution of the Agreement, the City may elect, without the agreement of Polygon, to apply development regulations in effect at that time to any development within the scope of the Agreement that has not been completed at that time. 10.6 Exhibits. All exhibits attached hereto are incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth herein. 10.7 Headings. The headings in this Agreement are inserted for reference only and shall not be construed to expand, limit or otherwise modify the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 10.8 Inte ation• Scope of Agreement.' This Agreement and its exhibits represent the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. There are no other agreements, oral or written, except as expressly set forth herein. This Agreement does not set forth all conditions applicable to the Project to the extent that additional conditions may be imposed as part of any permit issued by the City, as required by the Federal Way City Code as determined by the discretion of the Directors of the Departments of Community Development Services and/or Public Works. 10.9 Enforcement. Subject to the notice and cure provisions of this section, in the event either party fails to satisfy any of its obligations under this Agreement, the other party shall have the right to enforce this Agreement by an action at law for damages or in equity for specific performance. The Parties acknowledge that damages are not an adequate remedy for breach by either party. In addition to the remedies set forth herein, in the event of a breach of this Agreement by Polygon, the City may enforce this Agreement under the enforcement provisions of the Federal Way City Code in effect at the time of the breach and/or it may terminate this Agreement and take action to amend the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation of the Property. No party shall be in default under this Agreement unless it has failed to perform its duties or obligations under this Agreement for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice of default from the other party. A notice of default shall specify the nature of the alleged default and the manner in which the default may be cured. If the nature of the default is such that it cannot be reasonably cured within thirty (30) days, then a party shall not be deemed in default if the party commences a cure within thirty (30) days and, thereafter, diligently pursues completion of the cure. 10.10 Attorneys Fees. In any action brought to enforce this Agreement or for damages resulting from a breach thereof, the prevailing party as determined by the court, shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees. 10.11 Police Power. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to diminish, restrict or limit the police powers of the City granted by the Washington State Constitution or by general law. This Agreement is an exercise of the City's police powers, the authority granted under RCW 36.70B.170-.210, and other laws. 7 DRAFT 11-19-2004 10.12 Recording; Assi ent. The Agreement shall be recorded with the Real Property Records Division of the King County Records and Elections Department. 10.13 No Third Parties. The Agreement is made and entered into for the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. No other person or entity is an intended third party beneficiary. No other person or entity shall have any right of action under this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have hereunto placed their hand and seals on the day and year indicated. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, a Washington municipal corporation David H. Moseley, City Manager Date: ATTEST: This day of December 2004. N. Christine Green, CMC Federal Way City Clerk Approved as to Form for City of Federal Way: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson 9 POLYGON 2000, INC., a Washington corporation Date: Approved as to Form for Polygon: DRAFT 11-19-2004 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day, personally appeared before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, to me known to be the of Polygon 2000, Inc., a Washington corporation, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she is authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal this day of , 2004. KACD\Wynstone\Concomitant (notary signature) (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires: X DRAFT 11-19-2004 EXHIBIT A TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 10 DRAFT 11-19-2004 EXHIBIT B TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DEVELOPMENT PLAN 11 DRAFT 11-19-2004 EXHIBIT C TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SECTION 7.2 RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS 12 CITY OF :yam Federal Way DATE: November 18, 2004 TO: Brad Plemmons CC: Greg Fewins Kevin Peterson Rick Perez Ken Miller MEMORANDUM Community Development Services Department FROM: Jim Harris SUBJECT: WYNSTONE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CZA - (03-102630-00-SU) On November 18, 2004 you inquired about the process to modify or segregate the proposed Wynstone plat into separate projects and proceed with permitting and development of only the Hopkins parcel (192104 9030). Currently, the Wynstone project is made up of two separate adjacent parcels, tax lot No's 192104 9030 and 192104 9044. City staff has briefly analyzed your inquiry and provide the following response. In order to revise the proposal and request preliminary plat approval for parcel 192104-9030, a new preliminary plat application, SEPA checklist, accompanying technical studies and application fees192104 9030 are required. The new preliminary plat submittal is required because the revised proposal would be substantially different from the proposal that was previously submitted to the City. Specifically, the following factors were considered by the City in reviewing your inquiry: stormwater drainage, utilities, traffic impacts, roadway improvements, lot configuration, lot count, and school access. If you would like to further discuss the process for a new application contact me at 253 835-2641. CITY OF � Federal November 10, 2004 Brad Plemmons 101 T Street SE Auburn, WA 98002 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 y Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com Re: Permit #03-102630-000-00-SU; WYNSTONE Preliminary Plat *no site address* Dear Mr. Plemmons: This letter sets forth the street improvements for that portion of 10'h Avenue SW/12'h Avenue SW from the southerly boundary of the proposed plat to SW Campus Drive, as previously agreed upon with the City Public Works Director. Also addressed in this letter are the required street improvements for SW Campus Drive along the property frontage, as well as required intersection improvements at SW Campus Drive and 10" Avenue SW. 121h Avenue SW/10'h Avenue SW, from the existing road constructed by the Orchid Lane subdivision, across Tax Lot 30, to the southerly property line of Tax Lot 44: Construct full street improvements per City Standard Cross Section `M', including street trees and streetlights. 10`h Avenue SW, from the southerly property boundary of Tax Lot 44 (parcel 192104 9044), northerly to SW Campus Drive: 1) Dedication of the full 70-foot Right -of -Way to the City. Right -of -Way dedication to be via Statutory Warranty Deed. Additional right-of-way, dedicated by the City Parks Department and additional slope easement, will be necessary to complete the full -width dedication to SW Campus Drive. 2) Clearing and grading of the entire 70-foot right-of-way limits, required for the full street improvements, including clearing and grading outside the right-of-way, sufficient to provide a 2:1 slope, and as identified and allowed by the geo-technical report, from the westerly right-of-way to top of slope. 3) Stabilization and erosion control of the graded area, outside the westerly edge of the hard -surface street improvements. 4) The graded area, outside the westerly right-of-way limit shall be within a slope easement granted to the City, where needed. 5) Street improvements for the east half of the right-of-way, as measured from the centerline: 18-foot paved roadway (centerline to face of curb), curb and gutter, six-foot planter strip with street trees and street lights, eight -foot sidewalk, and three-foot utility strip. Brad Plemmons 66 Re: Permit #03-102630-000-00-SU; Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 2 6) Street improvements for the west half of the right-of-way, as measured from the centerline: six -feet of paved roadway, plus thickened -edge, and provisions for drainage. The crown of the roadway pavement shall be located at the right-of-way centerline, in anticipation of the future 36-foot pavement section. (See attached sketch.) 7) Asphalt roadway taper, at a 25:1 ratio, where the roadway section transitions from the 36-foot roadway section within Tax Lot 30, to the 24-foot roadway section within Tax Lot 44. 8) In order to accommodate the storm drainage system within this section of roadway, it may be advisable to re -locate the storm main to the easterly margin of the roadway. Coordination with Lakehaven Utility District of this possible relocation is required, as it would affect the location of the sewer main as currently shown on the plans. SW Campus Drive, southeast of loth Avenue SW, along the property frontage: 1) Dedication of seven feet of property to the City for right-of-way. 2) Additional asphalt paving to create a twelve -foot wide left -turn pocket to access 10`' Avenue SW from SW Campus Drive per City Standard Roadway Section `E', with concrete curb and gutter, six-foot planter strip with street trees and street lights, eight -foot sidewalk, and three-foot utility strip. 3) Provide sufficient new roadway taper east from the widened paved edge at the easterly property boundary. As you may be aware, the property to the east is being considered for development under the preliminary plat of Campus Crest. Campus Crest developers will be required to construct SW Campus Drive to the same roadway frontage improvements as this development. It may be advantageous for you to contact the Campus Crest developers to try and coordinate street improvements within SW Campus Drive. Intersection of 101h Avenue SW and SW Campus Drive: 1) NW quadrant of intersection: extend existing curb, gutter, planter strip, and sidewalk around the radius to the southwest, terminating at the end of the curb return. This section of the new 10'hAvenue SW roadway, including pavement width, shall be constructed to the City's Type `M' street section. (See attached sketch) 2) Asphalt paved taper, at a 25:1 ratio within the new 1061 Avenue SW right-of-way, from the end of the curb return, to meet the proposed 24-foot paved roadway section, described above. (See attached sketch.) 3) Construct City -standard handicap access ramps at the NW and SW quadrants of the intersection. 4) Add channelization in SW Campus Drive to create a left turn lane onto 10'h Avenue SW, into the proposed plat. 5) Revise the left turn marking for traffic on the existing leg of 10`h Avenue SW so that it will be a combined thru and left turn pavement marking (WSDOT Type 3L marking). 6) Channelization for the new section of 10"' Avenue SW would be marked for two lanes of traffic: one lane westbound, with the southerly lane allowing for thru-, left, and right -turns. Brad Plemmons Re: Permit #03-102630-000-00-SU; Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 3 7) Signal modifications, including, but not limited to, wiring and conduit, loops, new signal poles, mast arms, etc., to the existing traffic signal system. Coordinate with City Traffic Division for all required modifications. Please have your engineer revise the plans as necessary to illustrate the above -noted improvements. Additional street cross -sections, depicting each street section described, and including from- and to - centerline stationing, must be on the revised plans. The plans will be included as part of the exhibits for the Hearing Examiner's Public Hearing. If you have any questions, please contact Kevin Peterson, Engineer Plans Reviewer at (253) 835-2734. Sincerely, Ken Miller, P.E. Deputy Public Works Director KM/KP:dl enclosure cc: Cary Roe, P.E., Public Works Director Greg Fewins, Deputy Director, Community Development Rick Perez, P.E., City Traffic Engineer Will Appleton, P.E., Development Services Manager Jim Harris, Senior Planner Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Day File 1Acsdc\docs\save\3 0213 3 72 034. doc _J C s R�9a. J 4 2ps Qa« r 00 gin a J l Gv AcLn-c�'� A. VA VC, l� ljL p aL W Cz�tL � gl AC c.J IJ .IL I4 yp C�h P •o �j o I� 2'`4 1 QoA >W A` c.- of kly� p�SZ`o�l. � SL.� LAw&Pus Jc>P- 10 Sv`1 b�•l'i zsEt-nct.l 03-1oz63o-;M t4 o-c- Qb scAl_.q- MEMORANDUM CITY OF -- ' Federal Way DATE: November 8, 2004 TO: Brad Plemmons (Via email: Brplemmo@aol.com) FROM: Jim Hsi ris CJ Department of Community Development Services FILE SUBJECT: Wynstone Concomitant Zoning Agreement Amendment, File # 03-102632-00-UP Upon further review of your request for a revision to the Concomitant Zoning Agreement and preparation of the staff report to the Hearing Examiner, two items arose that I want to bring to your attention. First, the proposed plat design and layout provides a 60-foot wide landscape tract adjacent to Campus Drive. Federal Way City Code does not require a 60-foot wide landscape tract. However, pursuant to your plat application and letter received by the City on July 29, 2004, it appears the 60-foot landscape buffer tract was provided in response to the City's March 4, 2003, preapplication comments which state: "staff would recommend the following provisions of the CZA would still be applicable: 60-foot minimum building setback along Campus Drive." City staff supports the proposed width and location of the landscape tract, as it fulfills the intent of the original CZA. As you may know, the adjacent preliminary plat on parcel 7, known as Campus Crest, also has the same 60-foot building setback requirement in the CZA. Due to site considerations and layout of the proposal, the applicant for Campus Crest did not provide a 60-foot wide landscape tract, and requested to provide less than a 60-foot landscape buffer. For the parcel 7 preliminary plat, City staff will likely support a landscape tract along Campus Drive that varies in width from 40 feet wide up to 120 feet in width, as it fulfills the intent of the original CZA. However, the Campus Crest landscape tract averages less than 60 feet in width. Second, while drafting the CZA amendment staff report, City staff became aware that the proportionate density approved for the original (21 acre) parcel 5 is less density than is permitted in the underlying RM- 2400 zone. Therefore, staff is recommending the same proportionate density be retained on the proposed future multi -family site (lot 45) as is allowed under the current CZA. Specifically, using the existing proportionate density for determination of maximum number of dwelling units, a maximum of 16 multi- family units are permitted on proposed lot 45. The existing and proposed density is calculated as follows: Ori inal. parcel 5 CZA: Size: 21 acres (914,760 square feet) 1990 CZA maximum number of dwelling units permitted: 347 units 914,760/347 = 1 unit per 2,636 square feet RemaininjZ parcel 5B: Size of proposed lot 45: (43,348 square feet) 43,348/2,636 square feet (existing density) = 16 units maximum Contact me at 253-835-2641 if you have any questions about these comments. 03-102632 Doc, I.D. 29503 CITY OF Federal Way DATE: November 4, 2004 TO: Greg Fewins Kathy McClung Cary Roe Ken Miller Rick Perez Kevin Peterson Amy Jo Pearsall FROM: Jim xr;[s SUBJECT: WYNSTONE fff(��(00"'3-102632-UP) FILE MEMORANDUM Community Development Services. Department Draft timeline for Wynstone Hearing on preliminary plat and CZA review: November 12, 2004 Law Department to draft and distribute first draft of new CZA to City staff. November 17, 2004 Staff meet to discuss and review CZA draft and provide edits to Law Department. November 19, 2004 Forward draft CZA to Brad Plemmons. November 22, 2004 Receive comments back from applicant or meet with applicant on CZA. November 23, 2004(io:omm) Public hearing notice to FW Mirror for publication.* November 27, 2004 Public hearing notice publication in FW Mirror. November 29, 2004 Staff reports for preliminary plat and CZA amendment drafted for review by staff. December 6, 2004 Staff reports to Hearing Examiner. December 14, 2004 Hearing Examiner public hearing. * We should have concurrence with the applicant on the form and content of agreement before publishing hearing date. If we are close to agreement completion and concurrence with applicant, we can publish hearing date and continue to negotiate prior to issuing draft CZA on December 6, 2004. 03-102632 Doc. 1 D. 29463 FILE ` CITY OF � Federal November 2, 2004 Brad Plemmons 101 T Street SE Auburn, WA 98002 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Way (253) 835-7000 www. cityo ffederal wa y. com RE: File No: 03-102630-00-SU; WYNSTONE Dear Mr. Plemmons: While preparing the staff report for the Wynstone preliminary plat application, review of the application materials has resulted in the need for additional technical information for the proposal. Please review the items identified below and provide the requested information as soon as possible. The information requested below is necessary for preparation of the staff report to the Hearing Examiner. 1. Provide a written request and justification to clear and grade beyond the right-of-way and utility areas. Your request and justification must address all areas proposed to be cleared and graded beyond right-of-way and utility areas. The July 29, 2004, submittal does not include the referenced written request and justification. 2. Provide a grading plan with a revised cross section "C" across proposed lot number 5 and through 121h Place SW, that corresponds to the grading and wall plan dated 8/20/04, submitted 8/24/04. 3. Provide a revised grading plan that notes the top of wall and bottom of wall elevations at several locations, to determine the height of the walls on the rear of lots 5-9 and in the water quality pond in Tract A. 4. Provide a cross section from Campus Drive, up through the pond and proposed walls in Tract A. 5. For walls that are visible from public right -of ways and adjacent private property, provide a proposal for aesthetic treatment of these walls. City staff does not support blank untreated walls that are visible from public right-of-ways or other public spaces. Terracing of walls, vegetative screening, architectural treatment of walls, and minimizing height of walls are potential alternatives. 6. No action is necessary for this item; however, please note the following regarding open space. City staff is supportive of the proposed open space fee in lieu with credit as allowed by City code for buffer open space in Tract C, constrained open space in Tract G, usable open space in Tracts E and F, except as follows: Open space fee in -lieu for 15 percent open space on proposed lot 45 (one -acre multi -family parcel) is not allowed by code or supported by staff in conjunction with the preliminary plat. Mr. Plemmons November 2, 2004 Page 2 The open space on lot 45 must be provided at the time of the future development on lot 45 and meet the provisions of FWCC Section 22-667 (note 2) regarding size, dimensional requirements, usability, etc., including development of at least 10 percent of the area with children's play equipment. Specifically, the code requirement of at least 400 square feet of open space per dwelling unit on lot 45 must be provided. In addition, the open space on lot 45 must also equal a minimum of 15 percent of the gross area of lot 45 (6,502 square feet of open space on lot 45), regardless of the eventual dwelling unit count of lot 45 (43,348 X 15% = 6,502 square feet). As described above, the open space on lot 45 must meet the more restrictive of the subdivision code requirement of 15 percent gross open space, or the multi- family open space/recreation area requirements of FWCC Section 22-667. Review and approval of the lot 45 open space will occur in conjunction with permitting and development of lot 45. However, if you have a site plan for the future development, we can provide a cursory review of the open space at this time. Please note that slopes and required perimeter landscape buffers do not count toward open space under FWCC Section 22-667 (note 2). Please contact me at 253-835-2641 orjim.harris@cityoffederalway.com if you have any questions. Sincerely, `� v� Jim Harris Senior Planner enclosure 03-102630 Doc- I.D. CITY OF Federal Way DATE: October 15, 2004 TO: Amy Jo Pearsall, Assistant City Attorney FROM: Jim Harris MEMORANDUM Community Development Services Department SUBJECT: Wynstone Concomitant Agreement- (03-102632-00-UP) During the staff meeting on October 11, 2004, it was discussed that you would be preparing the new/amended Concomitant Zoning Agreement (CZA) for the Wynstone Preliminary Plat. With this memo, I am providing you the background necessary for drafting the new CZA. I assume that you will define and draft the format and legal content of the document. Greg Fewins and myself suggest that the new/amended CZA repeal the original 1990 CZA, and amendments adopted in Resolution 93-128 and Resolution 93-144. We suggest a format that makes one new CZA document the binding agreement for the subject parcel known as parcel 5(B). In this format, we can have one current and consolidated agreement for the property, rather than having a 1990 CZA with multiple amendments. What I anticipate is having one agreement that identifies all the applicable standards of the CZA. Attached is a matrix I prepared titled Parcel 5(B) Standards, October 11, 2004. This table summarizes the existing regulations from the 1990 CZA and 1993 amendments, as well as the applicant's requested revision and staff recommendation. This table should provide you with most of the technical information to develop the new CZA. As discussed at the meeting, Public Works (Cary Roe) should be consulted regarding the existing CZA provision regarding setting aside and dedication of the right-of-way corridor forthe extension of loth Avenue SW. You already have copies of the 1990 CZA, 1993 amendments, and supporting information. I - have also attached a copy of the applicant's August 27, 2003 letter to Jim Harris, identifying his requested amendments. A February 6, 2004 letter from Ken Miller to Brad Plemmons, regarding construction of 10th/12th Avenue is also attached for your information. Once you have the agreement drafted, CDS and Public Works staff will review -the document before forwarding it to the applicant for review, discussion and negotiation. We will also need to discuss timing of setting a public hearing. Specifically, should we be setting a hearing date now, or should we wait to set a hearing after we send and hopefully reach an agreement with the applicant on the content and terms of the new CZA? As you know the applicant is pushing to get this project approved, and City staff wants to get this moving along. During the next couple of weeks, I anticipate drafting the staff reports for both the preliminary plat and CZA amendment process. Feel free to contact me at any time if you have any questions or need additional information (ext 2641). CITY OF �. Federal Way DATE: October 15, 2004 TO: Amy Jo Pearsall, Assistant City Attorney MEMORANDUM Community Development Services Department FROM: Jim Harris SUBJECT: Wynstone Concomitant Agreement- (03-102632-00-UP) During the staff meeting on October 11, 2004, it was discussed that you would be preparing the new/amended Concomitant Zoning Agreement (CZA) for the Wynstone Preliminary Plat. With this memo, I am providing you the background necessary for drafting the new CZA. I assume that you will define and draft the format and legal content of the document. Greg Fewins and myself suggest that the new/amended CZA repeal the original 1990 CZA, and amendments adopted in Resolution 93-128 and Resolution 93-144. We suggest a format that makes one new CZA document the binding agreement for the subject parcel known as parcel 5(B). In this format, we can have one current and consolidated agreement for the property, rather than having a 1990 CZA with multiple amendments. What I anticipate is having one agreement that identifies all the applicable standards of the CZA. Attached is a matrix I prepared titled Parcel 5(B) Standards, October 11, 2004. This table summarizes the existing regulations from the 1990 CZA and 1993 amendments, as well as the applicant's requested revision and staff recommendation. This table should provide you with most of the technical information to develop the new CZA. As discussed at the meeting, Public Works (Cary Roe) should be consulted regarding the existing CZA provision regarding setting aside and dedication of the right-of-way corridor for the extension of 10th Avenue SW. You already have copies of the 1990 CZA, 1993 amendments, and supporting information. I have also attached a copy of the applicant's August 27, 2003 letter to Jim Harris, identifying his requested amendments. A February 6, 2004 letter from Ken Miller to Brad Plemmons, regarding construction of 1&/12th Avenue is also attached for your information. Once you have the agreement drafted, CDS and Public Works staff will review the document before forwarding it to the applicant for review, discussion and negotiation. We will also need to discuss timing of setting a public hearing. Specifically, should we be setting a hearing date now, or should we wait to set a hearing after we send and hopefully reach an agreement with the applicant on the content and terms of the new CZA? As you know the applicant is pushing to get this project approved, and City staff wants to get this moving along. During the next couple of weeks, I anticipate drafting the staff reports for both the preliminary plat and CZA amendment process. Feel free to contact me at any time if you have any questions or need additional information (ext 2641). CITY OF Federal Way Project Name: Project File No: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8"' Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-2607; Fax 253.835.2609 www.cityoffederalway.com SIGN INSTALLATION CERTIFICATE RECE-:1VED Project Address: 101� Ale - Installed By: Srad- Location of Installation: ' D 4 cC f � of Installation: Ao CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 1BUILONG faCPT. %i"i1 %4"%Y%,"%q'►,-6i %,% i% i% 3"i"'i d—i 7-i lei Q%��a+7�%f�%:dam%��i 65" :pz <�q a. .gyp. ,tea- ,�,: :�. :�. .6qr .ggr ,y¢a >�,: :fin :fir -fir r�qr •+Rr >�>: ,}�• '@Sn ';@r .�;. gyp. •cgs .�. ,tea >�. :Q• •Qr •R. �pr .S. ,y. I hereby testify that the sign installed fully complies with the installation standards of the Department of Community Development Service's "Instructions for Obtaining & Posting Public Notification Signs" and that the sign will be maintained until a final decision is issued on the land use action. I understand that failure to return this certificate within five days of posting may result in delays, notice of corrections, and re -mailings at the applicant's expense. f" 1�e Instal ler's Name �1 nstaller's Signature �Z- 1-,4 Date Phone Bulletin #036 — June 30, 2003 Page I of 1 kAHandouts — Revised\Sign Installation Certificate 1 4 �k Federal OF Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-661-4000; Fax 253-661-4129 www.city-Qftedercilway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, t�, po - hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice - �[l Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or W/posted to or at each of the attached addresses on Project Name File Number(s) D S - a, (a 3A -, E 3 El- Signature _ _ _ Date B�J�a K:\CD Administralion Files\Declaration of Distributiion.doc/Last p,�-Ied 0'_/19/2003 10:30 AM Posted Locations 1. Federal Way Regional Library — 34200 1st Way South, Federal Way, WA 2. Federal Way 320th Branch Library — 848 South 320th Street, Federal Way, WA 3. Federal Way City Hall — 33530 1" Way South, Federal Way, WA 4. Two Updates on Site — SW Campus Drive and loth Avenue SW. a. Yellow Board at SW Campus Drive and loth Avenue SW. b. Yellow Board at 340t„ SW and Driveway to Saghalie Park A'A CITY OF �+ Federal Way NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Wynstone Preliminary Plat Federal Way File No.: 03-102631-00-SE The City of Federal Way has determined that the following project does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City. Proposed Action: The proposed action includes subdividing approximately 13.5 acres into 45 lots. Proposed lots numbered 1 — 44 are for single-family use, and lot number 45 is for multi -family development. The proposal also includes developing an internal road system, street frontage improvements on Campus Drive SW, construction of 10`h/12'h SW through the site, traffic signal modifications at the intersection of 101h Avenue SW and Campus Drive, utility construction, storm drainage control improvements, and other related infrastructure improvements. The proposed action includes construction of up to 18 multi -family dwelling units on proposed lot number 45. The proposed action also includes amending the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement for a portion of the site. Proponent: Mr. Brad Plemmons, 101 T Street, Auburn, WA 98002 Ph. 206-293-1434 Location: The subject property is located along the south side of SW Campus Drive at the intersection of 10`h Avenue SW. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 12'h Avenue SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, Washington, King County tax parcel numbers 192104-9044 and 192104-9030, in the NW '/4 of Section 19, T2IN, R4E, WM. Lead Agency: City of Federal Way City Contact: Jim Harris, Senior Planner (253-835-2641, or jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com) MITIGATION MEASURES (SUMMARY): Clearing, grading, and street/utility work for the plat improvements is not permitted from October 31 to March 30, unless - approved in writing by the Public Works Director. The applicant shall construct the five City Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) projects impacted by the proposal, or, in lieu of constructing these TIP projects, prior to final plat approval, the applicant may voluntarily pay a pro -rats share contribution of $98,688.00 for the 44 single-family lots, and $20,554.00 for the multi -family project toward construction of the impacted TIP projects. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall construct two speed humps in accordance with City standards on SW 340`h Street between 13`h Court SW and 191h Avenue SW. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community Development Services (Federal Way City Hall, 33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on September 15, 2004. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the comment deadline. Any person aggrieved by the City's determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on September 1, 2004. Doc. I.D. 28348 03-102631 m- SS10-OS8 (fSZ) 'aN aoJ 15 UM$ 1 MS 'ilY u1Z1 0(19�Bi6 [fSt7 ''aJ •'1 J aM-M& (CSZ) -N auo,rd -Q L� WE •CdYl6f rid/19/Iv� 'We aNAHNYY/73dd x ;slo,: a0nldItoSI VISOZ 41^�'1„5 61�6 r 'L� NVId .1Vld V/ ON12tI33NIJN3 Zi303V(' r 3NOISNAM SNOPVn3ld OVHB n- ....: N. e h � �?�a n p Vim o u o'z J •i �, i i��ti�4� 8 c [,.}.��?�C �a o � E, Z � ru3 vt ,u" -� 5 ��n cc3u o vJ C Q nOa U 00 `� ¢aR Vr ICY N `a U :- 5Q F, a J '^ N 5 J�3o��� `k -z p is iioa � � c�.� a¢ �W `d'i= �+�- � o•.. oc z A • CC¢ C COL` —✓ . --_ - - 12th PL. 5w "xl- `\ * fear �€ . x 4, \' rR d SEYj oar _.. �f �'f. 5 ,WA 1 F � � .i ������.��i�'�"��Sj..} �•,Y°Yci.•i����e3 r ' � =i N � - i, IF- ' %•r k.p 1 c E$�`a-n_ae S aiF rho g=R„ Cy` o jig _ -•JL• i �•- cps 50; aLY � •► �_ ern i'€ Y i�,•.t 'c�` Ij r Y•.-� Sir •�C � i:� �_ �h ti' `�rA v �Px�' • 1 :l�r 'a: Yx}^'gyp }`3wg�Rx��r:•xgy &R-- �_ Y�F.i��9.S.z YYB►L:� "[Y�;•is$� S FEDERAL WAY A10.10R Your Community Newspaper - Affidavit of Publication Debbie Kaufman, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a semi -weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a semi -weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained at the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way L-770 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 1st day of September, 2004 , and ending on the 1st day of September, 2004 , both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 132.80 which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.090 Subscribed to and sworn before me this loth day of September, 2004. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way ��►►►►u t u i 1 u1,�� NOTAf? y' ^ �.'0 1111 i t i t t►►► `LC 1414 SO. 324TH STREET, SUITE B210, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 ■ 253-925-5565 0 FAX: 253-925-5750 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Wynstone Preliminary Plat Federal Way File No.: 03-102631-00-SE The City of Federal Way has determined that the following project does not have a prob• able significant adverse impact on the envi• ronment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c), This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City. Proposed Action: The proposed action In- cludes subdividing approximately 13.5 acres into 45 lots. Proposed lots numbered 1 - 44 are for single-family use, and lot number 45 is for mullAarnily development. The proposal also includes developing an internal road system, street frontage improvements On Campus Drive SW, construction of 10th/12th SW through the site, traffic signal modifica- tions at the intersection of loth Avenue SW and Campus Drive, utility construction, storm drainage control improvements, and other related infrastructure improvements. The proposed action includes construction of up to 18 multi -family dwelling units an proposed lot number 45. The proposed action also In- cludes amending the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement for a portion of the site. Proponent: Mr. Brad Plemmons, 101 T Streez, Auburn, WA 98002 Ph. 206-293-1434 Location: The subject pprogerty is located along the south side of SW Campus Drive at the intersection of 10th Avenue SW. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 12th Av- i enue SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, Washington, King County tax parcel numbers 192104.9044 and 192104-9030, ir• the NW 1/4 of Section 19, T21 N, R4E, WM. Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Cl?Contact: Jim Harris, Senior Planner (253-835-2641, 01 1 im. harns@c ityoff edera {way, com MITIGATION MEASURES (SUMMARY): 1. Clearing, grading, and street/utility work for the plat improvements is not permitted from October 31 to March 30, unless a pi, proved in writing by the Public Works ❑i- rector. 2. The applicant shall construct the five City Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) projects impacted by the proposal. or, in lieu of constructing these TIP pro, jects, prior to final plat approval, the appli- cant may voluntarily pay a pro-rata share contribution of $98,688.00 for the 44 sin- gle-family lots, and $20,554.00 for the multi -family pr01ect toward construction of the impacted TIP projects. 3. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall construct two speed humps in ac• cordance with City standards on SW 340th Street between 13th Court SW and 19th Avenue SW. Further information regarding this action iG available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community De. velopment Services (Federal Way City Hall, 33325 8th Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718), This MONS is issued under WAC 197-11 340(2). Comments trust be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on 5eptemher 15, 2004. Unless modified by the City, this determina• Lion will become final following the comment deadline. Any person aggrieved by the C'rry's determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. FWM#-770 Published on September 1, 2004. CITY OF�'~�* Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-661-4000; Fax 253-661-4129 www.cifyoffederolway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I '�� hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ANotice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was nailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on , 2004. Project Name U.A File Number(s) 3� > i - J-Z- Signature Date 9-/7 - K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /21 /2004 8:59 AM CITY OF �. Federal Way CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 TRAVIS NELSON WDFW PO BOX 73254 PUYALLUP WA 98373 printed on recycled paper �. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 CITY OF Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-661-4000;Fax 253-661-4129 FederalWa',-, www.cityoffederalwa�com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) P91 Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other was Xmailed ❑ faxed 2004 Project Name ❑- Land Use Decision Letter - ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on r0-1 File Number(s) 0 Signature Date K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Lass printed 1 /21 /2004 8:59 AM CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Wynstone Preliminary Plat Federal Way File No.: 03-102631-00-SE The City of Federal Way has determined that the following project does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (ElS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City. Proposed Action: The proposed action includes subdividing approximately I3.5 acres into 45 lots. Proposed lots numbered 1 — 44 are for single-family use, and lot number 45 is for multi -family development. The proposal also includes developing an internal road system, street frontage improvements on Campus Drive SW, construction of 101h/I21h SW through the site, traffic signal modifications at the intersection of 101h Avenue SW and Campus Drive, utility construction, storm drainage control improvements, and other related infrastructure improvements. The proposed action includes construction of up to 18 multi -family dwelling units on proposed lot number 45. The proposed action also includes amending the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement for a portion of the site. Proponent: Mr. Brad Plemmons, 101 T Street, Auburn, WA 98002 Ph. 206-293-1434 Location: The subject property is located along the south side of SW Campus Drive at the intersection of 101h Avenue SW. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 12`h Avenue SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, Washington, King County tax parcel numbers 192104-9044 and 192104-9030, in the NW 1/4 of Section 19, T21N, R4E, WM. Lead Agency: City of Federal Way City Contact: Jim Harris, Senior Planner (253-835-2641, or jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com) MITIGATION MEASURES (SUMMARY): 1. Clearing, grading, and street/utility work for the plat improvements is not permitted from October 31 to March 30, unless approved in writing by the Public Works Director. 2. The applicant shall construct the five City Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) projects impacted by the proposal, or, in lieu of constructing these TIP projects, prior to final plat approval, the applicant may voluntarily pay a pro -rats share contribution of $98,689.00 for the 44 single -Family lots, and $20,554,00 for the multi -family project toward construction of the impacted TIP projects. 3. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall construct two speed humps in accordance with City standards on SW 3401h Street between 131h Court SW and 19'h Avenue SW. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community Development Services (Federal Way City Hall, 33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on September 15, 2004. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the comment deadline. Any person aggrieved by the City's determination may rile an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on September 1, 2004. Doc. 1.D 28348 03-102631 2 - m— SSIO-oSB (CSL) �C60-OSB (fSZ) ON auoud .5A �fl �� 1$ 41BCf M$ 3' M$3Av 41Z1 O<+9-i!i CCTlf J Fp IfOR6 -Y/A 'l uaH :69r-aTf (lHJ �wvr ryai II lPJ96 'VM Yltlrlgnr R i 1 ^I : a�wd wroz woos 61r6 L' NV7d 1V7d ANVNI"173Nd a a f mr DN1833NIJN3 2J303 Vf 3NOISNAM SNOMY31d 0VYG s € Ilk i A t ] ice, a "yam• ¢ g Uo O Gi ��ti t��N a 4v m$ 2 •Y;✓l' WN o - 04< nmvic¢cy mrn "Rio�� J y = s� oQ NWt ..00 i„ izz c.W y .�r� ; 0yy�+�22}fi gppppqCC ` 1 34iO wwws eH }}}}}�Q..Eiuei V-A ui3N WrwU x` oW rn y A N t >r+' � �y ` ` S of 7 r y 5 .a= ''•�` , _ -i6 -- cats. ��_- - - �•, 7y�� sr. Qom..__ ___ _�_ __ _I___�__� .7m«5 121h AL. SW l'-Y;g+ ��• .y .o.a:. __-` ,; ki ram;. , �,F•-•� f - .I i r:a t �Q $� ,Ll�• Ul pg. 1r i pcJ�try =•�;fib;���� „r� t x5 eL�:[: �_i�u L•:.iS°. �C.�@�6''•�' :— � No ' � l Yi .. >EX �� r jC• � �.. My f S is.yxa is _Zia «YS yy2C•-{X-� u, 05/01/2003 21:35 253-661-1846 CAMPUS GROVE le-Y- lk. (A'--) PAGE 01/01 1300 SW Campus 10-1 19-2 31-4 Drive Federal Way, WA M-2- 19_3 32-1 98023 10.3 19-4 32_2 104_ 20-1 32-3 01-1 10.5 20 Z 32.4 01-2 1-1s1- 2W- 33-1 01-3 -11-2 20-4 33-2 01-4 1:14- 20.4- 33-3 02-1 .14-4 21-1 33-4 02-2 U-5 2 �� 34-1 02-3 44-6 21-3 34-2 03-1 124- 34-3 03.2 - 12 2 224 34-4 03-3 12-3- nr Buildings 35 03-4 - 12-4 22-3 through 72 are all 04-1 F2-jr Z7-4- 4 unit buildings ie 04-2 U-6 Z3-1 35-1 04-3 1 1^ 21-T 35-2 044 13'Z ' 23-3 3 S-3 04-5 1` 23=4 35-4 04-6 t3 24-1 04-7 t4-T 24-2 05-1 14-2 24-3 05-2 14-3^ 24-4 05-3 144 25-1 05-4 T4=5` 25-2 05-5 14 * 25-3 05-6 M-7— 25-4 _ .. ..... 05-7 454 26-1 06-1 15=Z 26-2 06-2 15-3 26-3 06-3 154 26-4 06-4 I3=5 27-1 06-5 T5=6- 27-2 07.1 16-1 27-3 3 07-2 16-2 1.6-3 27.4 28-1 p SO o; I = ^� 07-3 16-4 28-2 H 07-4 16-5 28-3_ - x 07-5 16-6 28-4 o a 07-6 17-1 22:1 08-1 17-2 29-2 08-2 17-3 29-3 W 08-3 17-4 29-4 084 17-5 3.0-I_ 09-1 17-6 30.2 09-2 1.8-1 3Q-3 09-3 18.2 30-4 09- 18-3 16 L_ 09-5 18-4 31-2 19-1 3.1-3` T m v c7 0 0 rn ::3o m --1 o -< r >< co -� sa w oa Fli o cn W L A V r m A -G T o m w n 0 o n m o c r z O� a a 3 p ^ 'n N to C c o to r N a T m -0 0 o C7 m -0 o n C=, --G F-- x � c � a V � aa�co � ® n1 o � d rna � `fl a V c A -c f9a�j 02 03 02:12p FAX .COVER. -SHEET Gle At 'west Campus Luxury Ar>tments. &.TM 952 SW Camp'us.!JNve, Fedej�iWay, WA-08023 Phone (253) 952-6921or (Z5U 3g_afiqa._ Fax (253) 952.2975 Send to;---) ---::: From:(' Fax Number: Date: D Urgent U Reply ASAP El please E -_ 04 ase review r_ f For your information Total pages including cover. f Comments: . c S STNAPUCCO Ma,�d 02 03 02:12p 2CRM410 01 240 Period: 05/200 :his Rent Rol' BLD UNIT =D F 18 D1 0 18 D2 D 18 D3 0 19 Al 19 Al 19 A2 19r.3 19 31 19 B2 19 93 _9 Cl 19 C2 19 C3 13 DI :9`D2 19 D2 19 D3 19 m 19 E2 19 E3 19 E3 ' Qcwn4;o • QCRM410 0M14410- -01 01 01 240 24-0- - 340' -- period: Pe,Xiod: DS/20 Periods 05/ Tfi'is Rent Rol This Re :c R BLD UNI DLD UNITID 3LD UNIT I —�' 1.0 B 1 16 D3 12 Cl Cl I Al 1 12 171 L 10 82 17 A2 13 Al i 1D C1 17 A3 .2 13 R1 10 C2 17 B° _ 13 Cl 10 D1 17 82 f 13 Ell 10 D2 17 83 13 E1 17 C1 13 F1 10 E2 17 C2 I 10 E2 1[L31. 17 C3 �- 10_� 1� 6ti 7 D1 10 F2 17 D2 11 Al 1S Al _7 -D3 _L ]2_ 15 E1 18 Al 15 rl 19 A2B2- 1_5 D1 -3 A3 15 61 18 Ir- a- 1s F1 18 B2 11 Di 15 F1 1B B3 it D2 16 Al [ 10 Cl 12 Al 16 81 18 C2 _2 E1 I6 C1 18 C3 QCRK41D 01 240 Period: This Rem BLD UVI: 08 DI 08 E1 08 F1 09 Al 09 A2 09 131 09 B2 09 C1 09 C2 09 C2 D9--D3 09 D2 09 E1 09 E2 Og F 09 F2 09 G1 09 G2 09 R1 09 IA2 10 Al 10 A2 p.4 } OMM410 QCRM41, 01 01 240 240 Period:- PeriQdc This Rer- This Rei BLD UNI BLD a]: 04 DI 01 Al 04 E1 01 B1 04 Fl 01 Cl GS Al 01 D= 05 al 01 E1 05 C1 71 _. GS Di 02 Al 05 El 02 El OS Fl 06 Al 02 Cl 06 31 02 D1 06 Cl 03 A-- 06 Ul 03 B1 07 Al 03 Cl 07 Bl 03 0 ^. CI 03 F_1 07 DI 03 F1 09 Al 04 AI OS B1 04 Al OS CL 04 B1 08 C1 ^�G 04 C1 Ma,y 02 03 02:12p P•2 • 4CR+N410 r 240 -CPM410 ti CR,vi4 �0. pCRh143� Period: OS/2 - QMV410 01 yl 240 240 - I�sr QC'RiMC:y--• - al 240 Pe -Spa- t'e7r1Cd: This Re= 'to 01 240 Period: 0512 • CS/; 240 Period: O5l2 - - T}+is Th Rent Rs aLD` +�.T t ID period: 05%2 -- This Re Ro Rear Rr This Rent Ro P; BZZ 23 al Tllis Rent Rc BLD MUT _D »ci. 1L D 11, {r BLD UNIT -D 21 20 Al --34.D-. -WIT Ir � 2632 0 r. 23 S2 0 �+ .. _ 24 C2 0. 25 D3 '1 21 D1 26 `s3 0 0 23 a3 20 A2 24 C3 C2 25 3I 0 21 D, ?6 F1 0 23 Cl_ 25 E2 0 20 ;.,3 -� 21 D2 24 % 1s 26.22 0 23 C` . 20 Bi 25 F; 0 21 D3 24 D2 C 26 ?3 23 C3 j j 25 Fl p 20 82 22 Al 24 D3� 27 Al 23 ❑1 20 83 �} �- '"•j� r1 22 A2 7 it + 24 E1 2 0" 27 A2 - 20 Cl ( 22 A3 20 C2 r 22 B1 20 C3 20 Dl f 22 B2 20 D2 j L0 20 RZ , i 20 t2 r(( 2" 23 22 D1 22 02 21 p2 f f 22 D3 + 22 sI + 23 Al j 21 S2 i II 27 Cl jII 1` 23 A2 21 C2 +� 23 A3 3 2 25 Fe 24 E2 0: 27 BI 23 D3 25 F3 I24 E3 27 CI 23 Sl 26 Al f i 24 F1 27 D1 23 E2 ja 26 A2 24_ c2_- 23 33 y 26 i,3 27 31 23 Fl 0 26 Bi 25- Al 23 F2 26 62 27 F1 F iL 23 F3 36 23 27 F2 Z5 A3 26 wl 24 Al 28 Al 2a 31 i 26 C2 24 A2 28 31 25 32 24 A3, 26 C3 20 C1 25 33 1 24 al �l 26 D1 2e DI 1 25 Cl 24 B2 26 D2 29 Al 25 L< 24 B3 fI I 29 A2 25 C3 26 D3 t 24 Cl 29 31 25 D1 26 F.1 _ 29 Cl 25 D2 CCRM410 .01 240 POziod: Th:s acn- BLD 29 C1 23 2_ 29 F_ 29 F2 30 Al 30 P1 30 82 30 cl 30 C2 30 Cl 31 _m1 31 3i 3_ 31 C. 31 CS 3'_ El 31 -.. 3: 32 Al 32 Bl 32 C_ May 02 03 02:12p P.3 . QCRM4_0 QCRM410 . 240 05/2 240 J_ 0'9 ►J QCRM410 QCRM4Z0 J QGRN.4Period 10 Period: 05/2 24-0 Z40 0, 01 01 4C3,Y, This Rent Ro: _ Period: 05/: T Period: 240 Gs/L Period: 240 1 240 0I This Rer-t Ro "12c - OS/ Period: od: Og � 240 Period; 051 3LD UK -IT ID Thi's'71e[TC This Pent Rt Th; Per.iad BID UNIT ID ---..e*_ P,This Rant R TSis Rent R 36 A2 02 9LA UNIT _ I. BLIIUNI^ IL 8LD UNIT I BLD Thia R, 36 Cl 40 Bl 0 � UNIT Z. _ UNIT I BLD GNU LD o. '. 47 C2 51 D1 D 55 Bi v _._ " — 36 � ;:1 36 C2 3 �-. 94 P2 ' ind_cat 40 d2` 0"a 97 C1 0a ss c1 ,a 36 31 78 C3 11 51 E1 0 - 43 Al 47 L!Z 55 Dl 36 92 38 DI 04 45 A2 5' ?1 0 40• Cl 11� 47 D2 07 55 1)1 36 9a 7: 33 D2 D; 95 S_ 52 Al 0 4-0 -C2�a 47 D3 0] 55 u� 0 36 C'_ 33 D3 0 - 4S Cl 52 8_ 0 36 C2 0 0 e0 C3 O1 49 Al 0 55 4$ Dl 39 Al 52 C1 0 36 C3 0 0 40 01 a 48 el 0 56 Al 45 31 •39 A2 52 DI 36 D1 39 43 0 40 32 0 45 PL 48Z1 52 Sl 56 91 39 31 0 40 D3 0 45 i2 36 D2 — — — — — — — — —� Al � 48 -AL ti :2- � 55 C1 0 9 6 Al91 i 36 D3 39 32 C 56 DI 41 A2 0 53 Al t 46 S2 39 33 0 4 ? Al 31 Al 91 31 J 57 al 46 B2 1 49 B'_ l 53 B1 I 37 B1 39 =. 41 Cl 0 57 Bl 4.5 C1 39 C2 49 _Cl 53 Cl 37 C'_ 41 Dl 0 57 Bl 49 Al 53 D1 r6 CZ 39 -3 ' 37 J1 41 E1 0 57 C1 'r9 �1 50 Al 53 E1 46 Cl 38 Al c 4_ C1 0 57 D1 3? D2 sa .&1__ S" ^- 47 A_ 33 A2 41 ?2 39 73 54 Al PRCPERTY '7 A2 Si` C1 58 A3 .2 Al 40 Al 54 B2 CURRENT/O] 47, A3 APPLICANT, �0 81 50 �1 CCCUPIED VAMVT UST 40 A2 42 A2 54 Cl TOTALS 47 31 38 B2 51 Al GROSS POS 42 B1 47 132 38 B3 94 J1 SUL44ARY C 40 A3 SI Bl R 47 33 42 Cl 55 Al P P. 51 Cl s-^ M N 47 Cl C C -'M� 4o 0 r.r3'i 4" -, nb " e z _► 3 -t co 0 Q=tn K) a o ems+ • so N I N I" m �o — 0 o n m m a o ism �x x ct� rr- co A v � g co uo co 63M o cm Mt LO r c ao "T,- A A -�G -G -n to o rn cn c, C=)N C7 m r � z a 3 o v' ►vao w I N 1 ^� KING COUNTY DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS i Supra oW �U HE lll �R�er KC 1689 m�awN�•[d��T[w�y T NW 19=00I -4 SCALE i = i00' RECEIVED jUN 2 6 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. i � = # , i *----------------- -� MetroScan / King --_- ------------------_-_* 'Owner :Glen Park Associates LIc Parcel # :192104 9005 06 Site :1002 SW Campus Dr Federal Way Sale Date :07/27/2000 Mail :2150 N 107th St #370 Seattle Wa 98133 Sale Price :$31,686,000 Full Use :011 Res,Apartment Asd.V :$15,842,000 e--- Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 5 N 1/2 OF NW Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 B1dgSF:274,063 Ac:16.82 YB:1989 Ph: # 2 ---------------------• MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Campus Grove L1c;Born Lloyd W Parcel # :192104 9006 05 Site :33715 loth Ave SW Federal Way Sale Date :01/11/2000 Mail :PO Box 178 Bow Wa 98232 Sale Price Use :011 Res,Apartment Asd.V :$6,968,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 6 POR GL 1 SEC Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 B1dgSF:149,534 Ac:6.86 YBT-1990 Ph: # 3 *--------------------- ' MetroScan / King • ---------- ---___---------------* Owner :Klak Golf Llc Parcel # :192104 9008 03 Site :700 SW Campus Dr Federal Way Sale Date :10/11/2000 Mail :122 S Michigan Ave #1000 Chicago Il 60603 Sale Price :$850,000 Use :301 Vacant,Multi-family Asd.V :$2,341,700 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 8 SE 1/4 OF NW Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:17.92 YB: Ph: # 4 --------------------- MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Papke Daniel P/Susan D;+ Parcel # :192104 9019 00 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :07/03/2001 Mail :PO Box 3649 Federal Way Wa 98063 Sale Price :$160,'000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$156,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 19 S 1/5 OF GL 2 Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:4.53 YB: Ph: # 5 *------------------------. MetroScan / King : ---------------------------------* Owner :Nelson John & Jo Ellen Parcel # :192104 9024 03 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :07/08/1986 Mail :PO Box 3229 Federal Way Wa 98063 Sale Price :$11,000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$46,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 24 W 160 FT OF S Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:1.04 YB: Ph: # 6 *---------------------: MetroScan / King : ------------------ --_----__-----* Owner :Omega International Investment Corporati Parcel # :192104 9025 02 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :11/22/1999 Mail :16622 178th Ave NE Woodinville Wa 98072 Sale Price :$227,500 Full. Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$54,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 25 N 250 FT OF W Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.89 YB: Ph: # 7 *--------------------- MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Nelson John & Joellen Parcel # :192104. 9026 01 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date Mail :PO Box 3229 Federal Way Wa 98063 Sale Price Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$44,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 26 BEG 412 FT S Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.90 YB: Ph: # 8 *--------------------- MetroScan / King •---------------•-----------------* Owner :Pei-yi Corporation Parcel # :192104 9027 00 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :08/18/1989 Mail :246 SW 325th Pl Federal Way Wa 98023 Sale Price :$430,000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$259,000 Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 27 POR GL 2 BEG Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:8.77 YB: Ph: # 9 *---- --------------- : MetroScan / King : -------------------------------* Owner :Crow Willard S Parcel # :192104 9028 09 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date Mail :3803 120th Ave SE Bellevue Wa 98006 Sale Price �) Use :300.Vacant,Res.idential Asd.V :$100 C Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 28 S 30 FT OF N Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.19 YB: Ph:425-746-50`N lr forination compiled from various sources. !Zeal Fstate Sotutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information coeotained in this report. #.'lp' *------------- MetroScan / King 00ner :Weisman Steven.I Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Mail :PO Box 16 King Cove Ak 99612 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 31 S 162 FT OF N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 11 *---------------------. MetroScan / King Owner :Nelson John & Joellen Site :1530 SW 341st P1 Federal Way 98023 Mail :PO Box 3229 Federal Way Wa 98063 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 32 S 162 FT OF N Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:•1/ / . Stories:l B1dgSF:960 # 12 *-------------------- MetroScan / King Owner :Federal Way Public Schools Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Mail :31405 18th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 33 W 335.76 FT Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 13 *-------------------- MetroScan / King Owner :Klak Federal Way Llc Site :702 SW Campus Dr Federal Way Mail :122 S Michigan Ave #1000 Chicago Il 60603 Use :301 Vacant,Multi-family Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 43 POR OF GL-1 Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 14 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :City Of Federal Way Site :1100 NE Campus Pkwy Seattle 98105 Mail :33530 lst Way S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :301 Vacant,Multi-family Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 50 POR GL l STR Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 15 *--------------------- MetroScan / King Owner :Fed Way School Dist #210 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Mail :31405 18th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use- :300 Vacant,Residential Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 52 POR OF SW 1/4 Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 16 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Fed Way School Dist #210 Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Mail :31405 18th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :000 *unknown Use Code* Lgl :STR 192104 TAXLOT 53 POR OF SW 1/4 Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: # 17 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Fortman William C%Katherine G Site :1605 SW 341st P1 Federal Way 98023 Mail :1605 SW 341st Pl Federal Way Wa 98023 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :STR 242103 TAXLOT 51 S 412 1/3 FT Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,230 # 18 *-------------------- MetroScan / King Owner :Omega International Investment Corporati Site :*no Site Address* Federal Way Mail :16622 178th Ave -NE Woodinville Wa 98072 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Lgl :STR 242103 TAXLOT 53 E 264 FT OF N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: ij---------------------------* Parcel # :192104 9031 04 Sale Date :05/22/1991 Sale Price :$122,500 Full Asd.V :$54,000 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:.65 YB: Ph: . --------------------------- Parcel # :192104 9032 03 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$98,000 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:.46 YB:-1938 Ph: •---------- ---------------------* Parcel # :192104 9033 02 Sale Date :10/19/1984 Sale Price . Asd.V :$757,000 Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:9.82 YB: Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :192104 9043 00 Sale Date :10/11/2000 Sale Price :$850,000 Full, Asd.V :$588,900 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E /�--- Ac:4.51 YB: Ph: ------------------------------- Parcel # :192104 9050 00 Sale Date :09/25/1991 Sale Price :$1,452,600 Asd.V :$1,757,400 Q:NW S:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:16.14 YB: Ph: ------------------------------ Parcel # :192104 9052 08 Sale Date :06/23/1994 Sale Price 9-� Asd.V :$66,000 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:1.34 YB: Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :192104 9053 07 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$31,000 1 Q:NW 5:19 T:21N R:04E Ac:1.09 YB: Ph: ---------------- ...-_-------------* Parcel # :242103 9051 03 Sale Date :12/01/1997 Sale Price :$215,000 Full Asd.V :$202,000 Q:NE 5:24 T:21N R:03E Ac:2.50 YB:1949 Ph:253-661-0421 ------------------------------- Parcel # :242103 9053 01 Sale Date :11/22/1999 Sale Price :$227,500 Full Asd.V :$98,000 Q:NE 5:24 T:21N R:03E Ac:1.89 YB: Ph: Information compiledfrom various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. MetroScan / King (WAf - ) Parcel # 192104 9005 192104 9006 192104 9008 192104 9019 192104 9024 192104 9025 192104 9026 192104 9027 192104 9028 192104 9031 192104 9032 192104 9033 192104 9043 192104 9050 192104 9052 192104 9053 242103 9051 242103 9053 Owner Name Site Address Glen Park Associates Llc 1002 SW Campus Dr Federal W Campus Grove L1c;Born Lloy 33715 loth Ave SW Federal W Klak Golf Llc 700 SW Campus Dr Federal Wa Papke Daniel P/Susan D;+ *no Site Address* Federal W Nelson John & Jo Ellen *no Site Address* Federal W Omega International Invest *no Site Address* Federal W Nelson John & Joellen *no Site Address* Federal W Pei-yi Corporation *no Site Address* Federal W Crow Willard S *no Site Address* Federal W Weisman Steven I *no Site Address* Federal-W Nelson John & Joellen 1530 SW 341st Pl Federal Wa Federal Way Public Schools *no Site Address* Federal W Klak Federal Way Llc 702 SW Campus Dr Federal Wa City Of Federal Way 1100 NE Campus Pkwy Seattle Fed Way School Dist #210 *no Site Address* Federal W Fed Way School Dist #210 *no Site Address* Federal W Fortman William C/Katherin 1605 SW 341st P1 Federal Wa Omega International Invest *no Site Address* Federal W W t-) S tGrl^- YB Owner Phone -19 8 9 1990 425-746-5074 1938 1949 253-661-0421 fnfornealion compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representalions or tvarrantles as 10 he accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. FEMMA - US ARMY CORPS/ENGINEERS TRAVIS NELSON REGION 10 NTH DIV ATTN REGULATORY BRANCH WDFW 130 228T" ST SW PO BOX 3755 19112 PIONEER WAY E BOTHELL WA 98021-9796 SEATTLE WA 98124 ORTING WA 98360 DEPT OF ECOLOGY WSDOT PUGET SOUND AIR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY PO BOX 47703 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE 110 UNION ST STE 500 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 PO BOX 47331 SEATTLE WA 98101-2038 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7331 CRAIG STONE JAMEY TAYLOR WA NATURAL HERITAGE AREA ADMINISTRATOR DNR SEPA CENTER DNR WSDOT SOUTH KING COUNTY PO BOX 47015 PO BOX 47014 PO BOX 330310 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7015 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7014 SEATTLE WA 98133-9710 OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & WA STATE DEPT WILDLIFE RANDY PEARSON HISTORIC PRESERVATION 600 CAPITOL WAY N WASH STATE PARKS PO BOX 48343 OLYMPIA WA 98501-1091 PO BOX 42668 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8343 OLYMPIA WA 98504-2668 GARY KRIEDT SEATTLE/KING COUNTY MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE KING COUNTY TRANSIT DIV DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH PLANNING DEPT ENV PLANNING MS KSC-TR-0431 1404 CENTRAL AVE S STE 101 39015 172ND AVE SE 201 S JACKSON ST KENT WA 98032 AUBURN WA 98002 SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 GERI WALKER LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST FWFD FWSD PO BOX 4249 31617 1 ST AVE S 31405 18T" AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 PUYALLUP TRIBE FEDERAL WAY DISPOSAL AT&T CABLESTORE 2002 E 28T" ST PO BOX 1877 1414 324T" S TACOMA WA 98404 AUBURN WA 98071 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS CRAIG GIBSON RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES 2401 S 35T" ST 2401 S 35T" ST PO BOX 11007 TACOMA WA 98409-7460 TACOMA WA 98409-7460 TACOMA WA 98411 CITY OF TACOMA BLUS NE TAC NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL JOE ELTRICH LAND USE ADMINISTRATOR C/O JAMES COLBURN TACOMA WATER DIVISION 747 MARKET ST STE 345 TACOMA ECONOMIC DEV PO BOX 11007 TACOMA WA 98402-3769 747 MARKET ST RM 900 TACOMA WA 98411 TACOMA WA 98402-3793 CITY OF MILTON PAUL ALEXANDER MARY AUSBURN 1000 LAUREL ST METRO TRANSIT PSE MILTON WA 98354 201 S JACKSON ST MS KSCTR0413 6905 S 228T" ST SKC-SVC SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 KENT WA 98032 PAT PROUSE CHRIS CARREL JILL GASTON REALTY SPEC US WEST FRIENDS OF THE HYLEBOS BPA 450 110T" NE RM 409 PO BOX 24971 914 AVE "D" BELLEVUE WA 98004 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 SNOHOMISH WA 98290 BELLACARINO WOODS HOA 35204 6TH AVE SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 BRAD PLEMMONS 101 T ST SE AUBURN WA 98002 BARCLAY PLACE HOA 1034 SW 334T" FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 HARBOUR HOMES 1010 S 336T" ST STE 305 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 I aged vecsz a•l •-a / I £9Z0I-£0 rEld,Cieu►uniatd auojsu,CM SWIM gsonbar uo oilgnd ogi. of olqul►enu sr uorieuuojur sigl •Aouaou pool aqi ql!m ol3 uo uoiluuuojui laglo puu isil3Ioago luluauruorrnuo paialdumo u JO nnarnar 131JU apeur Senn uorsroap slg,L •Iaur are nnolaq palsil suoiiipuoo agl3>< �fluo (o)(Z)0£0'DIZ'£t AkDN .spun polrnba.r iou sr (SI3) juarualvig povdurl IvIuaumuonaud uu puu `Iuaruuoirnua agi uo loudun asianpu luuormais olqugord a anuq Iou swop it Iugl poumuolop suq lusodoid sigl ioj Aouasu pual ag1, '090'01 £' £.V MD2I of luurts rnd salnd 1,?V e0yod 1v;uawuo uauy alms u0I2mzgsvA aql aapun,44!ioglnu aA►iuuisgns jo asrojaxa J0J sisuq u su poluaisop suoriuln2cm puu `solm `suuld `sarorlod ludiorunur aagio puu `uoilou snll 10i uorlunluna jjuls Iuu3 oql `(dDM3) uvld ammarla rdwoD fvAj Imapad aril `Isrljoago Iuluauruonnua aril ur parjiluopi sloudun uodn poseq suorsroap 2urnnollo3 aqI so luur Xga.raq XuM Iuiapa3 jo XI!D agl jo luioUjo olglsuodsag aryl, XVAN lu.Iapa3 Jo ,'�4i0 :B3ua2V pea-1 WM `HtQd `NI U `61 uoiioaS 3o V, MIDI agl ui `0£06-V0IZ61 Puu pt,06-V0I Z6I sragwnu laorud xuI,iiunoD 2UN `uoi2uigsuM `XuM Papal ur `(ouwj p!gwO 3o Iuld ag13o q:pou) joolq 000p£ zip Xjoiuuzrxoiddu lu MS anuaAV ,,ZI jo snuruuol Xjni ixou agl slnqu osle airs aqL -MS onuzAV ,01 jo u0i13aU11ur agi iu anup sndureo MS jo opis gmos aql Suolu pal -cool sr Airadoad loofgns oqd, :uoiluaoZ t£VI-£6Z-90Z 'qd Z0086 VAN `ujngnd `IoojIS .I, 10I `suoulwold purg "'W :Iuauodoid •al►s agl jo uorlrod u .io3 luouraa.2d i?u►uoZ iuulturoouoD i?urlsrxa aqi Bulpuauiu sapnlour oslu uoriou posodord oqs •Sb .raqurnu iol posodold uo shun Burllannp Xliuruj-tllnur 81 of do jo uorlonrlsuoo sapnlour uorlou pasodoid agZ •sivauzanordurr oinionaisu.gur paiular joillo puu `sluauranoldurr loiluoo ai?eumip uuols `uoriorulsuoofirliln `aAi.rQ snduruo Ptm MS anuand ,,013o uorlaasaaiui agi IV suoliuog!pour luuSrS ogJurl `airs aql g2noigl MS ,nZ I1q,4I 3o uolion gsuoa `MS ancaQ sndwLD uo slu2mmoadrzn aRquo-ij loans `uraisXs puoi feuaaluz ue $rndolanap sapnloul osle lusodord oqL •azzs ur.laaj awnbs S8I`LI of iaaj a.runbs 000`S wor3 azrs-ur aouu.r siol Cj!u_wj-al2uts pasodoid otLL quaurdolanap AJIUMJ -rilnur io3 si Sl, .ragurnu iol puu `asn Xj!wu3-al2uis loj axe tt, — I pwaqurnu slol pasodoid •slol alundos Sp oiur sajou S'£I Xjaluw!xoiddu �?urprArpgns sapnloul uorlou posodord aqZ :uoilaV pasodoid :IS-00-10ZOI-CO.Oil aP.3 XIrAA, 119-iaPa3 luld fU9uimil0ad auOIsuXAk 2DWDIAINDISNON AO NOLLVNIM2tJL:IQ 'IV,LN:IWNO IIAN:l Q:I,LVDI,LIW Aem jejapaj __` j0 AlD Z a2ed "m a1•30a/ I£gzoI-£0 1EId KMUI uilatd auo;su,CM SI (IW •Iol lunpinipui goua uo iluipua2 pun Suiaualo Iuuoilippu ui Ilnsaa Ilinn slol oqljo goua uo uorlorralsuoo ao3 sliuuad j3uiplinq `luld luug oqljo Suipaooaa puu uo►lorulsuoo ainlorulsugui luld 2uimollo3 •uoilonalsuoo owoq �?uianp lol lunpinipui goua uo paluawoldwi oq of paambaa on suuld loaluoo uorso.ia `Xlluuoilippd -uoilorulsuoo wr4on.rlse.gur Iuld glinn uoilounfuoo ui spaupuuls 2uilomiBuo s,fq!D oqj gllnn oouupi000u ui poluawaldwr puu panoiddu oq of paambaa aau suuld dddMS PuL, DSg.L aq,L •uosuos lane oql 2uunp sluawan.oadwi Iuld oql aoj �laonnXlililnLlaaals puu 2urpuB `Butaualo nnollu oI aapao u► auop uoilunluna Injaauo u puu poluawaldwr aq pinogs saansuaw o2uuivap uuols luuoilippd -sgluow ,uosuas.Lip„ of poloialsw aq llugs olis oqj 2uipua2 puu 2uiauolo `a)lu-I aagluud lu soillliouj uoileallgui wuaalsunnop oqj of sloudwi luilualod olu2iliw of Jap.[o ul •uoiloruisuoo-Isod soililtouj luawo2uuuw aalunnwaols luouuuuad puu `uoilonalsuoo aarrlonalsuajui, luld2iuianp (dddMS) uvld uollua4toad uoilnjpod ralz,M twolS u PUe (DSgL) unld lotluoD uorinluauzzpag pun uozso rd efrn zodwa,L u jo luaurgsilqulso oql g2no rgl possaappu aq uuo wilonalsuoo loofoad sigl jo sloogo oqs •luawipos jo Iaodsut al puu uoisoaa ui Ilnsaa pinoo sallinrlou 2uiganlsip-lioS 'MS anuand �,o i puu antaQ sndumo jo uoiloosaalui aql lu luu2is ogjual u jo uo►Iuog!pow/rrotluiiulsui sopnloui oslu lusodoad oqZ •lu3woaa2d 2uiuoz luuliwoouoD puu sapoo X3i0 poldopu glinn Xldwoo Isnw puu loafoid oql jo Iaud u su papnloui uaaq anuq IaoilS y,ZI £ MS anuQ sndwuo uo soRquo4 oql Buolu sluowano_idwi puu `loafo.id oql u►glinn MS anuandZI/y,OI 2uipnIoui puu it, ld aqI urglinn sluauzanordwi laails jo uoilonalsuoo -V •sloudwr o! jjLll asaanpu Iuuogiri21s aluBrliw of aapao ui saaJ uoilu.2iliw ulna -old aingialuoo Xli.rulunlon, ao sloafoid d11 paloudwi oql Ionalsuoo Isnw iodolanap oqj •sdial aaow ao OI Xq poloudwi sloafoad dI.L ano3 pog!luopi suq .CuM luaapa,q jo,iliD oqL - laonnlau uorlupodsuual s,,rllD oqj uo loudwi luuogiu2is anuq pinom Iuawdolanap aglXq poluaaua2 sdul nnau aq,L •sdial anoq 31uad 2uw3Aa XUPNaann nnau -ZI aluaaua2 pinonn Iuawdolanap oql jo uoilaod Xliwuj-illnw oql puu `sdial inoq Nuod 2uluana Xup3laann nnau I S aluaaua2 pinonn luawdolanap oql jo uoypod Xliuw3-al2uis aqI `t OOZ `I £ go-MW palup `soluioossd V unnoag aagdolstagD Xq paaudaad `(Vl I,) sisXluud louduzl ogjua,L oqj uo posug •poluawaldwi si uoilu2piw ssalun �laonnlau puoa 2uipunoaans oqj ui slsixo sloudwi asaanpu aoj Iuilualod oql lugl aluoipui sisXluuu oqljo sllnsaa aqL •poz�juuu alarm loofoad posodoad oql ao3 ,Causs000u sluawanoadwi Xunnpuoa puu sloudw► uoilulaodsuual `sluawaambaa opoo glinn aouupa000u uI '£ •IuowooBv guruoZ IuullwoouoD u glinn OOtiZ 1N-d pauoz si looaud Xlaaglaou oql puu (,iliwu j-alifurS Iuiluapisa-d) Z-L S-g pauoz sr looaud Xi ioglnos aql •suoilualsap Ouiuoz luaaaJJip onnl suq Xpodoad loafgns oq,L •Z •olis oql jo uoilaod u io3 Iuotuow2d 2uiuoz luuliwoouoD 2uilsixo agl 2uipuowu sopnloui oslu uoilou posodoad oql -sluawan.oadwi ainlonalsuajui polulai ioglo puu `sluowanoadwi loaluoo 02?uuruap uuols `uoilonalsuoo /C4ililn `anuQ sndwuo puu MS onuan.V y,Ol Jo uoiloasaalut aql Iu suoiluogipow luars ogjual `olis aqI g2noagl MS ,PZi/,i3OI 3o uoilonalsuoo `MS anuQ snduruo uo sluawanoadwi afuluoag laaals `wals.Cs puoa luuralui uu l?uidolanap sapnloui oslu Iusodoid oqL •ozis ui laaj aaunbs 98I `L I of laaj aaunbs 000`S wo.ij ozis ui o2uua slol Apurg3-ol2uis posodoad oqj -shun 2uillannp 8 i of do qj!m luawdolanap Xi!wuj-!Ilnw aoj sr S17 aagwnu lol puu `osn Xliuruj-al�?uis io3 am, t,p— I paaagwnu slol posodoad -slol oluaudos Sl, olui saaou S'£I Xlaluwixoaddu 2uipinipgns sopnloui uorlou posodoad oqj •uol2uigsuM XuM luaapo j ui `(ouurl pigoap jo luld oql jo glaou) 310olq 000t£ ogl.Claluwixoaddu lu MS onuany y,Z I jo snuiuuol Xlaaglaou oqj slnqu oslu olis oql 'MS anuand TO jo uolloosaalui oql Iu oAijCl snduiuD MS jo opis glnos oql 2uolu poluool s► �ilaadoad loafgns oqZ .LDV,,j AO SOAIIQAIIA In order to mitigate identified potential erosion impacts, mitigation is required for seasonal restrictions on clearing, grading, and street/utilitywork, due to the downstream infiltration facilities at Panther Lake. 6. The Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist, File No. 03-102631-00-SE is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Federal Way's 2002 Comprehensive Plan Policies adopted by Federal Way, and contained within the 2002 FWCP, serve as a basis for the exercise of substantive SEPA authority to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions applicable to potential adverse environmental impacts resulting from this project. The following components of the FWCP support the conditions for the development. Natural Environment Policy 2 (NEP2): Preserve and restore ecological functions and enhance natural beauty by encouraging community development patterns and site planning that maintains and complements natural landforms. NEP20: The City should encourage the retention of surface water runoff in wetlands in regional retention facilities, and in detention ponds, or use other similar stormwater management techniques to promote aquifer recharge. TG1 Maintain mobilityfor residents and businesses through a balanced, integrated system of transportation alternatives that: a. Meet local and regional needs though inter jurisdictionally coordinated and integrated systems. b. Reduces auto dependency, especially SO use. C. Supports the land use vision and plan. d. Protects and enhances the environment and quality of life. e. Provides acceptable levels of service for each transportation mode that is also commensurate with the planned levels of funding. TP5 Protect neighborhoods from traffic impacts. TG2 Provide a safe, efficient, convenient, and financially sustainable transportation system with sufficient capacity to move people, goods, and services at an acceptable level of service. The City shall develop and adopt policies for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance, .and preservation of new and existing facilities. TP10 Protect existing and acquire future right-of-way consistent with functional classification cross- section (transit, rail, bike, and pedestrian) needs. Require developments to dedicate right-of- way as needed for development commensurate with the impacts of the development. At a minimum, setback limits shall be used to assure that buildings are not placed within the right- of-way requirements for planned transportation facilities. Right-of-way dedication shall be commensurate with the developments' impact to the existing and planned transportation system. TP14 Provide access between major development areas identified in the recommended alternative, while improving business access and protecting City neighborhoods. NMNS 03-102631 / no.. LD. 28346 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 3 TP16 The Citys LOS standard shall be E. This is defined herein as a volume%apacity ratio less than 1.00 in accordance with Highway Capacity Manual (2000) operational analysis procedures. At signalized intersections, the analysis shall be conducted using a 120-second cycle length and level of service E is defined as less than 80 seconds of delay per vehicle. Where transit or HOV facilities are provided, the LOS shall be measured by average delay and volume%apacity ratio per person rather than per vehicle. This standard shall be used to identify concurrency needs and mitigation of development impacts. For long-range transportation planning, a volume%apacity ratio of 0.90 or greater will be used to identify locations for the more detailed operational analysis. TP17 Expand arterial capacity by constructing channelization improvements at intersections when they are an alternative to creating new lanes along a roadway corridor. TP19 Limit single -occupant vehicle capacity increases to those required to maintain the existing LOS, either by providing new streets or by widening existing streets. Maintain existing and preserve future street connections vital to system integrity. TP20 Take advantage of opportunities to open new road connections to create route alternatives, especially in areas with few access choices. TP21 Enhance traffic circulation and access with closer spacing of through streets, unless geographic constraints do not permit. Limit the area to be served by a single access point commensurate with planned density. TP23 Minimize through traffic on residential streets by maximizing through travel opportunities on arterial and collector streets. TP26 Employ traffic calming measures in neighborhoods (where feasible) where traffic volumes and speeds on local streets consistently exceed reasonable levels. TP37 Keep through traffic to state routes and arterials. Discourage the use of local or neighborhood streets for through movements (unless part of an overall process of creating a street grid). TP62 Modem the development review process by: o Incorporating revised impact analysis procedures that comply with GMA concurrency and other requirements. The revisions need to include revised Level of Service standards. o Streamlining it to the extent possible to minimize private development costs. Where developments are consistent with this plan, they should be allowed to proceed by mitigating site impacts; developing appropriate components of the HOV, transit, non - motorized, and motorized chapters; and participating in an equitable citywide improvement funding or mitigation payment program. o Incorporating requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. o Requiring explicit consideration of pedestrian and bicycle circulation, as well as parking and general circulation needs. SEPA CONDITIONS Based on the above policies, the following mitigation measures are required to minimize identified potential significant adverse impacts. MDNS 03-102631 / Doc I D. 28346 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 4 1. In order to mitigate potential erosion impacts to the infiltration facilities at Panther Lake downstream of this project, clearing grading and street/utility work for the plat improvements is not be permitted from October 31 to March 30, unless approved in writing by the Public Works Director. 2. In order to mitigate for the adverse transportation impacts of the new trips generated by the development on existing transportation network, prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall: Construct impacted TIP projects at the following locations: a. South 348'h Street from 91h Avenue South to SR 99: Add HOV lanes, install raised median, underground utilities, add northbound left -turn at SR 99. This project is impacted by 17 trips from the single-family component, and five trips from the multi -family component of the development. b. South 35e Street from l' Avenue South to SR 99: Widen to five lanes with bike lanes. This project is impacted by 12 trips from the single-family component, and two trips from the multi -family component of the development. C. South 348th Street at I't Avenue South: Add 2°d left -turn lanes eastbound, westbound, southbound, and westbound and southbound right -turn lanes. This project is impacted by 25 trips from the single-family component, and six trips from the multi -family component of the development. d. 12'h Avenue SW / SW 3446'Street from SW Campus Drive to 21't Avenue SW: Extend 3- lane street. Three different segments of this project are impacted as follows: i. 120' Avenue SW between SW Campus Drive and SW 340th Street is impacted by 45 trips from the single-family component, and 10 trips from the multi -family component of the development. The development would construct this segment of the project, therefore no mitigation is required. ii. 12th Avenue SW between SW 340th Street and SW 344`' Street is impacted by 18 trips from the single-family component, and four trips from the multi -family component. This development would construct a portion of this segment, and the remainder has been constructed by another development. Therefore, no mitigation is required for this segment. iii. SW 344"' Street from 12`h Avenue SW to 215t Avenue SW would be impacted by six trips from the single-family component and two trips from the multi -family component. Since this segment is impacted by less than 10 trips, no mitigation is required for this segment of the project. e. SR 18 at SR 161: Add P westbound left -turn lane, eastbound and westbound right -turn lanes, add third southbound lane on SR 161 to South 352°d Street. This project is impacted by 11 trips from the single-family component, and three trips from the multi -family component of the development. Channelization and street improvement plans shall be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the State of Washington and submitted for City of Federal Way's review and approval in concurrence with plat infrastructure construction, and constructed prior to final plat approval. In lieu of constructing the impacted TIP improvement projects, prior to final plat approval, the applicant may voluntarily pay the project's pro-rata share contribution for the single-family (SF) portion of the proposal. In 1 icu of constructing the impacted TIP improvement projects, prior to issuance of construction perm its for the multi family (MF) project, the applicant may voluntarily MDNS 03-102631 / Do. I.D. 28346 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 5 pay the project's pro-rata share contribution for the multi -family portion of the proposal. The pro- rata share contribution for each project is calculated based on the formula below: Project generated PM peak trips Fair share contribution =--------------------------------------- x (71? project cost — value of right-of-way and frontage improvements) Projected Total PM peak traffic These are calculated per the table below: TIP Project Name Project Cost Project Background Percent Fair -Share Project ID Trips Volume Impact Contribution 6 S 348`�' St: $4,350,000 17 SF 3553 0.3% SF $20,813 SF 9`h Ave S — SR 99 5 MF 0.1 % MF $6,122 MF 11 S 356`h St: $8,905,000 12 SF 1750 0.7% SF $61,063 SF I" Ave S — SR 99 2 MF 0.1 % MF $10,177 MF 13 S 348 1h St @ $1,800,000 25 SF 4459 0.6% SF $10,092 SF I" Ave S 6 MF 0.1 % MF $2,422 MF 20 SR 18 @ SR 161 $3,350,000 11 SF 5459 0.2% SF $6,720 SF 3 MF 0.1%MF $1,833 MF _ TOTALS $98,688 SF $20,554 MF Cost per Unit $2,243 SF $1,082 MF As required by state law, the City shall refund collected fees if not used for the identified TIP projects within five years. The completion of SW 3401h Street between 121h Avenue SW and 19th Avenue. SW would create a new route between neighborhoods to the south and Saghalie Junior High School, and shopping areas to the west of the development. This could adversely impact the safety of access to the school. Therefore, prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall construct two speed humps in accordance with City standards on SW 3401h Street between 131h Court SW and 19th Avenue SW to mitigate safety impacts associated with the increase in speed and volume of traffic on SW 340th Street. This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on September 15, 2004. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Contact Person: Jim Harris, Senior Planner, 253-661-4019 Responsible Official: Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services Address: 33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Date Issued: lo4Signature; ' MDNS 03-102631 / nog 1 R 28346 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 6 w -- m - _ ,MO-05B (EW -N •off •C60-OSB (fSZ) 'oN auoud Is uJBCf /AS 3' MS '3AY u)Zl O[i9-6f6 fr9V .x jill •-z vlsoz woos else JNI?J33NION3 2J303`df r J' NVId 1VId AdVNINI-13Nd 3NO1SNAM 190O:bf6' Y/�I.IdY?2nBMr 3s .s. 10, SNOi9W31d Ovau a r a c So \KI. wpm aa�o o�oN 4c�`o Vo c V c �, ?,`gym o•C �, h4 G� W jjaFinWZa C Oi Ci ry _ 2 _ '�a ri zj3z o 3eo dat--a� -' 4 K"- o o 0 oo�� Q hOJ3< �. N = n - VIP x' g� G� �L3�.'r�,r�r.•'•M C i 3�� ----- F2 r• •'. �:'.F° b � � — .—----121h Pj.. SW , rj � n A' i d � I n .� j ij�� { �r _ "tg R . ■ N•. .1'� o_ f Cio k� � �• ti_� .I 7 I. I cT lI 7 r 04 s o Aff g Y�• §LI �I r NI C Bs4�F5. sYy� L•~�'ti._..f j-- ..----.....�f---____-__�� � kr: � � � - m =='s^'�r .. - _ rl = --- - - __ b _in v- _ _ -'d��,�i�`= SAS i ? 1 •'! f � l/z _ u- •".'^. '- - '.L ?T Chl • I •ram } ten -•3 �. r" >� ! l/1- '� •.Y Y d :$ 00 pjf = s Jun =€yz' fib_, aex�fp" - - cL`-'nr'=3 L �v�i J �3 �� �` �•'Y< < o' zz��3^'�'�" duif+ 5F� r= „�o2=`i-so:•..'z ign �zzaw6 z"i ■ L.' .r 3 - -.. ttk �f-N�.,� ,f�f=s I = �•_ FEMA US ARMY CORPS/ENGINEERS TRAVIS NELSON REGION 10 NTH DIV ATTN REGULATORY BRANCH WDFW 130 228T" ST SW U3 - PO BOX 3755 19112 PIONEER WAY E BOTHELL WA 98021-9796 S SEATTLE WA 98124 ORTING WA 98360 EPT OF ECOLOGY NVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC PO BOX 47703 LYMPIA WA 98504-7703 WSDOT ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS REGULATORY COMPLIANCE PO BOX 47331 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7331 CRAIG STONE JAMEY TAYLOR AREA ADMINISTRATOR DNR SEPA CENTER WSDOT SOUTH KING COUNTY PO BOX 47015 PO BOX 330310 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7015 SEATTLE WA 98133-9710 TA OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION PO BOX 48343 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8343 GARY KRIEDT KING COUNTY TRANSIT DIV ENV PLANNING MS KSC-TR-0431 201 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 GERI WALKER FWSD 31405 18T" AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 PUYALLUP TRIBE 2002 E 28T" ST TACOMA WA 98404 PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 2401 S 35' ST - TACOMA WA 98409-7460 CITY OF TACOMA BLUS LAND USE ADMINISTRATOR 747 MARKET ST STE 345 TACOMA WA 98402-3769 WA STATE DEPT WILDLIFE 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 98501-1091 SEATTLE/KING COUNTY DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH 1404 CENTRAL AVE S STE 101 KENT WA 98032 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 FEDERAL WAY DISPOSAL PO BOX 1877 AUBURN WA- 98071 PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER 2401 S 35T" ST TACOMA WA 98409-7460 NE TAC NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL C/O JAMES COLBURN TACOMA ECONOMIC DEV 747 MARKET ST RM 900 TACOMA WA 98402-3793 PUGET SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 110 UNION ST STE 500 SEATTLE WA 98101-2038 WA NATURAL HERITAGE DNR PO BOX 47014 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7014 RANDY PEARSON WASH STATE PARKS PO BOX 42668 OLYMPIA WA 98504-2668 MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE PLANNING DEPT 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98002 FWFD 31617 11T AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 AT&T CABLESTORE 1414 324T" S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 CRAIG GIBSON TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES PO BOX 11007 TACOMA WA 98411 JOE ELTRICH TACOMA WATER DIVISION PO BOX 11007 TACOMA WA 98411 CITY OF MILTON PAUL ALEXANDER MARY AUSBURN 1000 LAUREL ST METRO TRANSIT PSE MILTON WA 98354 201 S JACKSON ST MS KSCTR0413 6905 S 228T" ST SKC-SVC SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 KENT WA 98032 PAT PROUSE US WEST 450 110' NE RM 409 BELLEVUE WA 98004 BELLACARINO WOODS HOA 35204 6T" AVE SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 BRAD PLEMMONS 101 T ST SE AUBURN WA 98002 CHRIS CARREL FRIENDS OF THE HYLEBOS PO BOX 24971 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 BARCLAY PLACE HOA 1034 SW 334TH FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 JILL GASTON REALTY SPEC BPA 914 AVE "D" SNOHOMISH WA 98290 HARBOUR HOMES 1010 S 336T" ST STE 305 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 CITY OF Federal flay DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-661-4000; Fax 253-661-4129 www.citvoffederalway.cam ' DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, V �j hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land -Use Application/Action ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) . Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption. of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed 'N�`y-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on _41-t- �j _, 2004. Project Name W r �)' File Number(s) - Signature K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /21 /2004 8:59 AM CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATED DETERNIINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Wynstone Preliminary Plat Federal Way File No.: 03-102631-00-SE The City of Federal Way has determined that the following project does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City. Proposed Action: The proposed action includes subdividing approximately 13.5 acres into 45 lots. Proposed lots numbered 1 — 44 are for single-family use, and lot number 45 is for multi -family development. The proposal also includes developing an internal road system, street frontage improvements on Campus Drive SW, construction of 10`h/12`h SW through the site, traffic signal modifications at the intersection of 10`h Avenue SW and Campus Drive, utility construction, storm drainage control improvements, and other related infrastructure improvements. The proposed action includes construction of up to 18 multi -family dwelling units on proposed lot number 45. The proposed action also includes amending the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement for a portion of the site. Proponent: Mr. Brad Plemmons, 101 T Street, Auburn, WA 98002 Ph. 206-293-1434 Location: The subject property is located along the south side of SW Campus Drive at the intersection of 10`h Avenue SW. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 12`h Avenue SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, Washington, King County tax parcel numbers 192104-9044 and 192104-9030, in the NW `/4 of Section 19, T21N, R4E, WM. Lead Agency: City of Federal Way City Contact: Jim Harris, Senior Planner (253-835-2641, or jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com) MITIGATION MEASURES (SUMMARY): Clearing, grading, and street/utility work for the plat improvements is not permitted from October 31 to March 30, unless approved in writing by the Public Works Director. 2. The applicant shall construct the five City Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) projects impacted by the proposal, or, in lieu of constructing these TIP projects, prior to final plat approval, the applicant may voluntarily pay a pro-ratashare contribution of $98,688.00 for the 44 single-family lots, and $20,554.00 for the multi -family project toward construction of the impacted TIP projects. 3. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall construct two speed humps in accordance with City standards on SW 3401h Street between 13'h Court SW and 19`h Avenue SW. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community Development Services (Federal Way City Hall, 33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on September 15, 2004. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the comment deadline. Any person aggrieved by the City's determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on September 1, 2004. 03-102631 Doc. I.D. 28348 KA 9910-059 (f9d) .N •..j m= u' 1f60-099 (ESL) .N a d S i 1S WBff MS V MS '11V U;ZI IfOBD -V/A '1 uaN S� u1jlIIS upl-n 6rr'6 ; NVId 1VId .(dVNIMUNd r�M is'I io'enr JNI?J33NIJN3 2i30:]Vr e r, 3NO1SNAM SNOM31d OVNB .r r v let r J n a 6�4v W R _ � I } oa :J �� . Ly� a y`e ={ 9 N k FS Wo�' � �o L• � ems' R - - V J m' � o C.1 O V Q� .� Il AT•$ O C I j�� �._ V ` a 1 Z o t Q' „' ��4 •'�� � c o � tug a� � �o o ?�. E, Z� r z*o Cam¢ � c Kry U CJ a�►^ � �W� I 22 �� � � cr =^^yJyi c gnoa� cWJi oo .'cl��'7 am :os" eo u �J- d O N .. r_` KK OG U OF 70N N w= yc�.: I O - � OUr a<a�?Qa� a 1`n3v',c--�wu z�Q'^ �� ,$�'� �3 to aw"• �IX n o �12th PL.SSW F - - 1 , _ is � �d•.� � 1 -,� . I Fq , r Ti ` ? q ���. �' r � w` +, • •�hJ' � it NO Y k r; iin J all i� Gt u c> -��•_sv ng§'Y_., 2._..�g.L•:3 a Cnlic qj. � W .rr`. '•shFs' F o ^ � i :���!,- t�1 � •. �yY. c r1yY;�.�i' - EXp»:�x3 Lai r �� o }g 3 .1 u' ■ TxY Asa' O • 'a >{ / +* �- iyF ' z r_ 5 a:� oil 4F as�4��� `i�� Y�L+Sa CF4is�=! � r• a� t� � 1 � .y � 1 Sg� 4i � !$3 � � �f'�d-sa a �C,F/� :��1 �•i �'`-J Tamara Fix - Legal Notice - _ - - - _ Page 1 From: Tamara Fix To: admin@fedwaymirror.com Date: 8/30/2004 11:42:02 AM Subject: Legal Notice Please publish the following legal notice (Wynstone Prelim Plat MDNS, #03-102631) in Wednesday's (Sept 1, 2004) issue. Please furnish an affidavit of publication. Thank you, Tamara Fix Administrative Assistant City of Federal Way PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 253-835-2602 253-661-4116 CC: dgrigg@soundpublishing.com 1 CITY OF Federal Wang, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-661-4000; Fax 253-661-4129 www.cifyoffederglway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION + hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other was X mailed ❑ faxed 1 % , 2004. Project Name w ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on File Number(s) 0 ?z,Lb a & - S C Signature Date 9 -J 7 - 0 V K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distdbution.doc/Last printed 1 /21 /2004 8:59 AM CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATED DETERAHNATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Wynstone Preliminary Plat Federal Way File No.: 03-102631-00-SE The City of Federal Way has determined that the following project does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City. Proposed Action: The proposed action includes subdividing approximately 13.5 acres into 45 lots. Proposed lots numbered 1 — 44 are for single-family use, and lot number 45 is for multi -family development. The proposai also includes developing an internal road system, street frontage improvements on Campus Drive SW, construction of IO'h/12`h SW through the site, traffic signal modifications at the intersection of I O'h Avenue SW and Campus Drive, utility construction, storm drainage control improvements, and other related infrastructure improvements. The proposed action includes construction of up to 18 multi -family dwelling units on proposed lot number 45. The proposed action also includes amending the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement for a portion of the site. Proponent: Mr. Brad Plemmons, 101 T Street, Auburn, WA 98002 Ph. 206-293-1434 Location: The subject property is located along the south side of SW Campus Drive at the intersection of 10`h Avenue SW. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 12`h Avenue SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, Washington, King County tax parcel numbers 192104-9044 and 192104-9030, in the NW 1/4 of Section 19, T21N, R4E, WM. Lead Agency: City of Federal Way City Contact: Jim Harris, Senior Planner (253-835-2641, or jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com) MITIGATION MEASURES (SUMMARY): 1. Clearing, grading, and streetlutility work for the plat improvements is not permitted from October 31 to March 30, unless approved in writing by the Public Works Director. 2. The applicant shall construct the five City Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) projects impacted by the proposal, or, in lieu of constructing these TIP projects, prior to final plat approval, the applicant may voluntarily pay a pro -rats share contribution of $98,688.00 for the 44 single-family lots, and $20,554.00 for the multi -family project toward construction of the impacted TIP projects. 3. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall construct two speed humps in accordance with City standards on SW 340`h Street between 13`h Court SW and 19`h Avenue SW. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community Development Services (Federal Way City Hall, 33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on September 15, 2004. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the comment deadline. Any person aggrieved by the City's determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on September 1, 2004. Doc, I.D. 28348 03-102631 W ga 9910-058 (m) otr vvj r£60-0G9 ([9Z) -eN —, n Li 5 1 ''IS W9ff MS T MS '3AV u1Zt ol."r's (fuy 1f096 'Y,'A 'J--x '0 :691-9ro jea) �wve L0096 •re Y1en6nr =I •R a�o/d Wroe vmos 6u6 L NV7d IV7d AHt(NIW1732/d I `JNIJ33NION3 �J30:]Vr r 3NO1SNAM SNOM37d OVNB w e a o o N " --•• - --- -- --was'.- �. _�S°H'� �•,r.�W & ------ --- '^ r^ mc�i �i'u U O da<N.O B.iW GN o irk U b 01`+S � �� � � • � is C ^ov cq 0¢QO o WOty O R2LLC�.� a�\fin¢ Ova i 0, r. I cln {�� NO, �' ' ' �h f..�/ • � • N � � I. , J �� -�-�—� to - y ��lL mq,. �+ ` `\ti •' is . -- �i.�w .r � a a .a 3 6 y -4 r ax1�3 .��� _ �� • � r y� y ..�; Imo. ?Gyy�+� �°�� `dw.,•` �, , - ,� i= yam;' i ���r � a n• �� - -- - Rif riIr ~� __tpi1 '}y��' _�• xxr S Cam•. Y all �`-3 SS Xsik�z ^ lot°a rn r a$w r �. S= g ?:. ry�S '`• y o cn a`ja i` gea •> y �, P 9i S 5 nPY;V >(1y( p 5 •t - �- I fr � W�� � y5�� ��§ � -gS'yR Y a: o � i `` - it �. �� ~. rn7' 3•.'�. �� 1r iItlC���� g9?i�.c BY � Y. 6'�8�.��* . twi VUi �'€ E � �• , r �, < �� O _: XkosR 'na:F3`�.5 $aq-rr - h g `€�rlSs$Xi��z"sbeaz�$�€:3F t i O �'Y �9;c§3 has IF i CITY OF Ak44*." Federal Way CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Michael Walsh 825 5th Avenue, Suite 202 Kirkland, WA 98033 0 printed on recycled paper CITY OF A. Federal Way CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Klak Golf c/o Klaff Realty 500 Shokie Blvd, Suite 44 Northbrook, IL 60602 Of printed on recycled paper C I TY OF FEDERAL WAY PO BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY WA. 98A63 9710 {{ A Erb COf 1MUIV 'D VE 0P MT 6 BUEPAIR TMIEN SEP .F 3 20U - BVJ is a o so K� � 5� \9(adK i�,� �C l (2 - 192104 9043 Klak Federal Way Llc 122 S Michigan Ave #1000 Chicago, IL 60603 ! lFF F i3 F i!!!�+ i!! l!!!!Fll!!l!I IB!!E 6- 41 1 W - I V33 ,� a CITY OF , —r., e, Federal Way NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Wynstone Preliminary Plat Federal Way File No.: 03-102631-00-SE The City of Federal Way has determined that the following project does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City. Proposed Action: The proposed action includes subdividing approximately 13.5 acres into 45 lots. Proposed lots numbered 1 — 44 are for single-family use, and lot number 45 is for multi -family development. The proposal also includes developing an internal road system, street frontage improvements on Campus Drive SW, construction of 101hi121h SW through the site, traffic signal modifications at the intersection of l0`h Avenue SW and Campus Drive, uti lity construction, storm drainage control improvements, and other related infrastructure improvements. The proposed action includes constriction of up to 18 multi -family dwelling units on proposed lot number 45. The proposed action also includes amending the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement for a portion of the site. Proponent: Mr. Brad Plemmons, 101 T Street, Auburn, WA 98002 Ph. 206-293-1434 Location: The subject property is located along the south side of SW Campus Drive at the intersection of 10`h Avenue $W. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 12`h Avenue SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, Washington, King County tax parcel numbers 192104-9044 and 192104-9030, in the NW 1/4 of Section 19, T21N, R4E, WM. Lead Agency: City of Federal Way City Contact: Jim Harris, Senior Planner (253-835-2641, or jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com) MITIGATION MEASURES (SUMMARY): Clearing, grading, and streetlutility work for the plat improvements is not permitted from October 31 to March 30, unless approved in writing by the Public Works Director. 2. The applicant shall construct the five City Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) projects impacted by the proposal, or, in lieu of constructing these TIP projects, prior to final plat approval, the applicant may voluntarily pay a pro-rata share contribution of $98,688.00 for the 44 single-family lots, and $20,554.00 for, the multi -family project toward construction of the impacted TIP projects. 3. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall construct two speed humps in accordance with City standards on SW 3401h Street between 13'h Court SW and I91h Avenue SW. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community DeveIopmcrlt Services (Federal Way City Hall, 33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA .98063-9718). This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on September 15, 2004. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the comment deadline. Any person aggrieved by the City's determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on September 1, 2004. 03-102631 Doc. I.D. 28348 ca - m- cr ` - t sslorosa (rsL) ON .a� •C6O-OSB (CSL) "oN auoud lLOB6 'WA '1--X K1 11 r 'IS 41 M$ 8 M$ '3V 41Z1 'V' 9,-4r fd (I'TLI 4 :her-, ICSC) +mud rooaevr. Naneos 'R I :i a=Old waOL N7nOS 61*6 ONQi :I 3NIJN3 i:130EVr NV7d 1V7d AHVNINI73&d 3NO1SNAM Is .s 1 1. SNOMY31d 0vba a : g ^1III w p e �(. A � Q og i' ` Q• V1'O 4WD 8-S c0- .4 � OOIQ.I - ttC rj Ol U �.i Mop 'o04 o XX WQ� Qt"•y��tU Uy nWYY I �~ O r-`¢,p I �w O $4Z Oy&.NNlea J U� _ «acC4a (y Oo-� w iNo i 4 Ea / 1 C, yy3 o tl arv- Ln �,• it -r y � _12th PL. s A x I o • 1 Ow uA, cE••3Z ui- �� s `- 2 a' .-• C..exN ,,. � a ati - .a 3 ? F zart' L � ��� •�'�--..-.. RIB `� k �� �! r- �; ...-_. __ C g,i o h >: - ` ' ?-" •-•�' • k l $ _ lei .3. ?L � LT" 43K kY>r],('i—CQ ^„9l. rr fpjfl ..fn ¢¢ F r'.r .... ;,y +c �. Y Yt FYRGe -- fir. � r� v e ..• r? M -�. � :_ u cd3 • Ri+�§ e,g8ya jyas. � ,#FA:, e4$L4m a3� x _ ' o , cn PE • ,3�� +nr. 5f!sad y`st: Y p a w Ai��-Ftgei �•S i A4~iy iLi-;{.ir�� -`�.:� _ - I iY� O� M15-� •� � �A •, � c J �33Ygg9 Fa g�-:x: G�au-rza�s��r ; ;_1' r tl MOP � ,gn A... . _ •, ( •■ 1 O ea y=y.E� Fw�v •} 4V �<;g U ,• g - -' as a` _� ----------- C I TY OF FEIVIE-RAL WAY PO BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY WA- 96063 9718 C I TY OF FEDERAL WAY PO BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY WA. 98063 9718 0mmo,,,')EVr'.EC@VSD By ELOPMENT DEPARThjc, SEP 2 12004 �oMjvujv,TyRtECEf VIED By DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,:)'E.P 2 0 2004 OCCUPANTS 952 S W CA PtS OR L42 _4( FEDER AY WA. 98023 OCCUPANTS 95 2 S A M P U S DR - # 2- FED AI_ WAY WA - n an ),i j. i PO 8 0 X 97 18 of sr_r.y- v _. FEDERAL WA Y WA. _ - 900639718 0 RECEIVED BY . UN TYDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SEA 2 to--2U04 } D "'PAN 1300 CAMPUS OR. FEOE L WAY WA- 98023 -.. P.m .. PO BOX 9718, -•s FEDERAL- WAY WA- 98063 9718. <q% Nj rye, f' OCCUP �i�S 95?W CAMPUS DR. F,Ei] ERAL WAY WA - 98023 PO BOX 9718 FEOERAL WAY WA. 980639718 ov\ . 'r4_._. •7eiie'°i:t:l: 6 s••:r x•s; il::F C®MMU�,yDEVELOPM $DEPART Nr SEP 2 4 2004 1� OCCUP TS 952 S W AMPUS OR.# FEDERAL AY WA. 98023 sw}.Fr 171'-�f-w -: = !! f 1 •i' .. , PO BOX 9718 y �� FEDERAL WAY 980 - 9718 �r G V\� c o umtwFry {lP�" , EPAA7IyEN7' 1 : 4 , 004 OCCUPANTS 962 S W CAMPUS nR_$ Ll-(A- NIXIE 9eO O 1 00 3( RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERAMLE AS ADDRESSF UNAMLE TO FORWARD DC: 99O6a97:1018 �a0����7�>�{lil!iliililli�iill,ii!{1!lii,ili!!lii!)lliii„!!111i!1 C I TY OF FEOERAL WAY i`apP E�cErvEoeY i P O B 0 X 97 18 NiDEPA �r FEDERAL WAY WA. ER 2 9 2004 980639718 ? OCCUIWA 1300DR.# e3-1 FEDE. 23 AS MRESSED rtt4�j '041"BLE TO FOFiW4R d rri I!Fli!li!f3!iEf!i!Ilii!II?3?7?!3?3ii??3�l?:il???i9 j.lei',7.1?={! CITY OF FH RAL WAY P O BOX 97 18 FEDERAL- WAY WA. 98063 9718 Ifile * REjEtVE6 BY Ca1i11Nf NfTy DEVELOPMENT DEPARTME SEP 2 8 2004. I0 CCUP ANT. 1300 AMPUS DR.#So-4 FEDEP WAY WA. 98023 i f-L i•r Elih Uf VLF ;', .�fIf1RES�rt :iil4B E TO FL hufiil vi d !3 � � liillllfll!11£11iti3iiliiii!!liilfi!!111!i�li!! FILE CITY OF <" 5 Federal Way MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Wynstone Preliminary Plat Federal Way File No. 03-102631-00-SE Proposed Action: The proposed action includes subdividing approximately 13.5 acres,into 45 separate lots. Proposed lots numbered 1 — 44 are for single-family use, and lot number 45 is for multi- family development. The proposed single-family lots range in size from 5,000 square feet to 17,185 square feet in size. The proposal also includes developing an internal road system, street frontage improvements on Campus Drive SW, construction of 10'h/ 12'I' SW through the site, traffic signal modifications at the intersection of 10"' Avenue SW and Campus Drive, utility construction, storm drainage control improvements; and other related infrastructure improvements. The proposed action includes construction of up to 18 multi -family dwelling units on proposed lot number 45. The proposed action also includes amending -the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement for a portion of the site. Proponent: Mr. Brad Plemmons, 101 T Street, Auburn, WA 98002 Ph. 206-293-1434 Location: The subject property is located along the south side of SW Campus Drive of the intersection of 106' Avenue SW. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 12`h Avenue SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, Washington, King County tax parcel numbers 192104-9044 and 192104-9030, in the NW 1/4 of Section 19, T21N, R4E, WM. Lead Agency: City of Federal Way The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following decisions based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist, the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), the final staff evaluation for this action, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31C.060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not'required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c) only if the conditions listed below are met. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. MDNS 03-102631 / Doc- I.D. 28346 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 1 FINDINGS OF FACT I . The subject property is located along the south side of SW Campus Drive at the intersection of 10`h Avenue SW. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 121h Avenue SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, Washington. The proposed action includes subdividing approximately 13.5 acres into 45 separate lots. Proposed lots numbered 1 — 44 are for single-family use, and lot number 45 is for multi -family development with up to 18 dwelling units. The proposed single-family lots range in size from 5,000 square feet to 17,185 square feet in size. The proposal also includes developing an internal road system, street frontage improvements on Campus Drive SW, construction of 10'h/12'' SW through the site, traffic signal modifications at the intersection of 10`h Avenue SW and Campus Drive, utility construction, storm drainage control improvements, and other related infrastructure improvements. The proposed action also includes amending the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement for a portion of the site. 2. The subject property has two different zoning designations. The southerly parcel is zoned RS 7.2 (Residential Single -Family) and the northerly parcel is zoned RM 2400 with a Concomitant Zoning Agreement. 3. In accordance with code requirements, transportation impacts and roadway improvements necessary for the proposed project were analyzed. The results of the analysis indicate that the potential for adverse impacts exists in the surrounding road network unless mitigation is implemented. Based on the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), prepared by Christopher Brown & Associates, dated March 31, 2004, the single-family portion of the development would generate 51 new weekday evening peak hour trips, and the multi -family portion of the development would generate 12 new weekday evening peak hour trips. The new trips generated by the development would have significant impact on the City's transportation network. The City of Federal Way has identified four TIP projects impacted by 10 or more trips. The developer must construct the impacted TIP projects or voluntarily contribute pro-rata mitigation fees in order to mitigate significant adverse traffic impacts. 4. Construction of street improvements within the plat and including 10`h/12`h Avenue SW within the project, and improvements along the frontages on Campus Drive SW 312`h Street have been included as a part of the project and must comply with adopted City codes and Concomitant Zoning Agreement. The proposal also includes installation/modification of a traffic signal at the intersection of Campus Drive and 10`h Avenue SW. Soil -disturbing activities could result in erosion and transport of sediment. The effects of this project construction. can be addressed through the establishment of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESC) and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during plat infrastructure construction, and permanent stormwater management facilities post -construction. In order to mitigate potential impacts to the downstream infiltration facilities at Panther Lake, clearing and grading the site shall be restricted to "dry season" months. Additional storm drainage measures should be implemented and a careful evaluation done in order to allow clearing, grading, and street/utilitywork for the plat improvements during the wet season. The TESC and SWPPP plans are required to be approved and implemented in accordance with the City's engineering standards in conjunction with plat infrastructure construction. Additionally, erosion control plans are required to be implemented on each individual lot during home construction. Following plat infrastructure construction and recording of the final plat, building permits for construction on each of the lots will result in additional clearing and grading on each individual lot. MDNS 03-102631 / D... I.D. 28346 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 2 In order to mitigate identified potential erosion impacts, mitigation is required for seasonal restrictions on clearing, grading, and street/utilitywork, due to the downstream infiltration facilities at Panther Lake. The Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist, File No. 03-102631-00-SE is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Federal Way's 2002 Comprehensive Plan Policies adopted by Federal Way, and contained within the 2002 FWCP, serve as a basis for the exercise of substantive SEPA authority to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions applicable to potential adverse environmental impacts resulting from this project. The following components of the FWCP support the conditions for the development. Natural Environment Policy 2 (NEP2): Preserve and restore ecological functions and enhance natural beauty by encouraging community development patterns and site planning that maintains and complements natural landforms. NEP20: The City should encourage the retention of surface water runoff in wetlands in regional retention facilities, and in detention ponds, or use other similar stormwater management techniques to promote aquifer recharge. TG1 Maintain mobilityfor residents and businesses through a balanced, integrated system of transportation alternatives that: a. Meet local and regional needs though inter jurisdictionally coordinated and integrated systems. b. Reduces auto dependency, especially SOV use. C. Supports the land use vision and plan. d. Protects and enhances the environment and quality of life. e. Provides acceptable levels of service for each transportation mode that is also commensurate with the planned levels offunding. TPS Protect neighborhoods from traffic impacts. TG2 Provide a safe, efficient, convenient, and financially sustainable transportation system with sufficient capacity to move people, goods, and services at an acceptable level of -service. The City shall develop and adopt policies for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and preservation of new and existing facilities. TP10 Protect existing and acquire future right-of-way consistent with functional classification cross- section (transit, rail, bike, and pedestrian) needs. Require developments to dedicate right-of- way as needed for development commensurate with the impacts of the development. At a minimum, setback limits shall be used to assure that buildings are not placed within the right- of-way requirements for planned transportation facilities. Right-of-way dedication shall be commensurate with the developments' impact to the existing and planned transportation system. TP14 Provide access between major development areas identified in the recommended alternative, while improving business access and protecting City neighborhoods. MDNS 03-102631 / no.. I.D. 28346 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 3 TP16 The City's LOS standard shall be E. This is defined herein as a volume%apacity ratio less than 1.00 in accordance with Highway Capacity Manual (2000) operational analysis procedures. At signalized intersections, the analysis shall be conducted using a 120-second cycle length and level of service E is defined as less than 80 seconds of delay per vehicle. Where transit or HOV facilities are provided, the LOS shall be measured by average delay and volume%apacity ratio per person rather than per vehicle. This standard shall be used to identify concurrency needs and mitigation of development impacts. For long-range transportation planning, a volume%apacity ratio of 0.90 or greater will be used to identify locations for the more detailed operational analysis. TP17 Expand arterial capacity by constructing channelization improvements at intersections when they are an alternative to creating new lanes along a roadway corridor. TP19 Limit single -occupant vehicle capacity increases to those required to maintain the existing LOS, either by providing new streets or by widening existing streets. Maintain existing and preserve future street connections vital to system integrity. TP20 Take advantage of opportunities to open new road connections to create route alternatives, especially in areas with few access choices. TP21 Enhance traffic circulation and access with closer spacing of through streets, unless geographic constraints do not permit. Limit the area to be served by a single access point commensurate with planned density. TP23 Minimize through traffic on residential streets by maximizing through travel opportunities on arterial and collector streets. TP26 Employ traffic calming measures in neighborhoods (where feasible) where traffic volumes and speeds on local streets consistently exceed reasonable levels. TP37 Keep through traffic to state routes and arterials. Discourage the use of local or neighborhood streets for through movements (unless part of an overall process of creating a street grid). TP62 Modify the development review process by: o Incorporating revised impact analysis procedures that comply with GALA concurrency and other requirements. The revisions need to include revised Level of Service standards. o Streamlining it to the extent possible to minimize private development costs. - Where developments are consistent with this plan, they should be allowed to proceed by mitigating site impacts; developing appropriate components of the HOV, transit, non - motorized, and motorized chapters; and participating in an equitable citywide improvement funding or mitigation payment program. o Incorporating requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. o Requiring explicit consideration ofpedestrian and bicycle circulation, as well as parking and general circulation needs. SEPA CONDITIONS Based on the above policies, the following mitigation measures are required to minimize identified potential significant adverse impacts. MDNS 03-102631 / Doc.1,D.2s346 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 4 1. In order to mitigate potential erosion impacts to the infiltration facilities at Panther Lake downstream of this project, clearing grading and street/utilitywork for the plat improvements is not be permitted from October 31 to March 30, unless approved in writing by the Public Works Director. 2. In order to mitigate for the adverse transportation impacts of the new trips generated by the development on existing transportation network, prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall: Construct impacted TIP projects at the following locations: a. South 348th Street from 9th Avenue South to SR 99: Add HOV lanes, install raised median, underground utilities, add northbound left -turn at SR 99. This project is impacted by 17 trips from the single-family component, and five trips from the multi -family component of the development. b. South 356th Street from 15t Avenue South to SR 99: Widen to five lanes with bike lanes. This project is impacted by 12 trips from the single-family component, and two trips from the multi -family component of the development. C. South 348`h Street at I" Avenue South: Add 2"d left -turn lanes eastbound, westbound, southbound, and westbound and southbound right -turn lanes. This project is impacted by 25 trips from the single-family component, and six trips from the multi -family component of the development. d. 12`h Avenue SW / SW 3441h Street from SW Campus Drive to 2151 Avenue SW: Extend 3- lane street. Three different segments of this project are impacted as follows: i. 12`h Avenue SW between SW Campus Drive and SW 340th Street is impacted by 45 trips from the single-family component, and 10 trips from the multi -family component of the development. The development would construct this segment of the project, therefore no mitigation is required. ii. 12th Avenue SW between SW 3400' Street and SW 344`h Street is impacted by 18 trips from the single-family component, and four trips from the multi -family component. This development would construct a portion of this segment, and the remainder has been constructed by another development. Therefore, no mitigation is required for this segment. iii. SW 344"' Street from 12th Avenue SW to 215' Avenue SW would be impacted by six trips from the single-family component and two trips from the multi -family component. Since this segment is impacted by less than 10 trips, no mitigation is required for this segment of the project. e. SR 18 at SR 161: Add P westbound left -turn lane, eastbound and westbound right -turn lanes, add third southbound lane on SR 161 to South 352°d Street. This project is impacted by 11 trips from the single-family component, and three trips from the multi -family component of the development. Channelization and street improvement plans shall be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the State of Washington and submitted for City of Federal Way's review and approval in concurrence with plat infrastructure construction, and constructed prior to final plat approval. In lieu of constructing the impacted TIP improvement projects, prior to final plat approval, the applicant may voluntarily pay the project's pro-rata share contribution for the single-family (SF) portion of the proposal. In 1 ieu of constructing the impacted TIP improvement projects, prior to issuance of construction permits for the multi -family (MF) project, the applicant may voluntarily MDNS 03-102631 /Doc I.D. 28346 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 5 pay the project's pro-rata share contribution for the multi -family portion of the proposal. The pro- rata share contribution for each project is calculated based on the formula below: Project generated PM peak trips Fair share contribution =------- --------- ---- -- x (IP project cost — value of right-of-way and frontage improvements) Projected Total PM peak traffic These are calculated per the table below: TIP Project Name Project Cost Project Background Percent Fair -Share Project ID Trips Volume Impact Contribution 6 S 348`h St: $4,350,000 17 SF 3553 0.3% SF $20,813 SF 91h Ave S — SR 99 5 MF 0.1 % MF $6,122 MF 11 S 356` St: $8,905,000 12 SF 1750 0.7% SF $61,063 SF I" Ave S — SR 99 2 MF 0.1 % MF $10,177 MF 13 S 348` St @ $1,800,000 25 SF 4459 0.6% SF $10,092 SF I" Ave S 6 MF 0.1% MF $2,422 MF 20 SR 18 @ SR 161 $3,350,000 11 SF 5459 0.2% SF $6,720 SF 3 MF 0.1%MF $1,833 MF TOTALS $98,688 SF $20,554 MF Cost per Unit $2,243 SF $1,082 MF As required by state law, the City shall refund collected fees if not used for the identified TIP projects within five years. The completion of SW 340`h Street between 12`h Avenue SW and 19`h Avenue SW would create a new route between neighborhoods to the south and Saghalie Junior High School, and shopping areas to the west of the development. This could adversely impact the safety of access to the school. Therefore, prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall construct two speed humps in accordance with City standards on SW 340t" Street between 13`h Court SW and 191h Avenue SW to mitigate safety impacts associated with the increase in speed and volume of traffic on SW 3401h Street. This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on September 15, 2004. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Contact Person: Jim Harris, Senior Planner, 253-661-4019 Responsible Official: Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services Address: 33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Wo41-Date Issued:_ 1Q _ Signature: MDNS 03-102631 /Doe. ID 28346 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 6 W u ' SS10-OSB (fSz) .N •., ''IS WBff MS 3' MS 3AV vlz/ O<19-6f6 OTC) —j KI �r6o-ose (rsz7 'oN .10 b6 �Unnen, $ it IfOG6 'VIA •+°ar + NV7d 1 V7d ANVNIWl73ad ss is 1 '0' a�01d 41yOZ 41n05 6H6 `1 3NOlSNAM SNOM37d OV2/B • =_ 0N12j33NI0N3 2J303V • I _F o N N i� c ter. C �•n�n� SIT W ,��}z ',���G 1 "-' " •i A. 4CC /1� a zx'Fg Sj� `c OiGi vi OeO y V 5 1�1 = V'� �+, �✓1C qq N -� N P ��.��CyIa ILA �iw• i o UZ _O m�i� w=E±� � � iO NN OI o. 1•',.'1 �',O2Q3 �Fti 7�� ��� a•d' N � .3 a .. �•lr V 2ti � 1 Q� n ,1� �• qz'n +�'v �� `Qom t�i ice •'°"ram' I .. 6ppv� � �'r � � r�eiA�r,✓1u $ - rn .�m�, N a i y --- - - _ _--- _____----- I pg w Q r 2ti PL, SlH ki ze - `` � � a I ..,a . a 's� =� m}• ��'I Imo- y8 �. ., 1 = axa Ln -77 3 f : •� - -- r n BR�Y�� g`:2 = •e _• f• i 'ri..� ,ems ti Q -i!W NY2_� - - aY� f.e : S 1 �n3c • •$V f n '`. 1 /- -6~�4 �'�-'� r■ �vlJ ��, � § :.// .. •. �..1 `; Ste'.d`, rY- •, ti E r .� 1. JT ? J �'<' F'^� �•o��„����soF�se•.3 o=<.=iN ��i ���� �� u _ { 1� 0 •+ ` / t 'is j c�� i iin�u��a S"�W�N�i�`-"a�=-• (7 <� I--'-�„ '- •.�— RQ }•r C "erg A1%k CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATED DETERNIINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Wynstone Preliminary Plat Federal Way File No.: 03-102631-00-SE The City of Federal Way has determined that the following project does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City. Proposed Action: The proposed action includes subdividing approximately 13.5 acres into 45 lots. Proposed lots numbered 1 — 4'4 are for single-family use, and lot number 45 is for multi -family development. The proposal also includes developing an internal road system, street frontage improvements on Campus Drive SW, construction of 10`h/I P SW through the site, traffic signal modifications at the intersection of 10`h Avenue SW and Campus Drive, utility construction, storm drainage control improvements, and other related infrastructure improvements. The proposed action includes construction of up to 18 multi -family dwelling units on proposed lot number 45. The proposed action also includes amending the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement for a portion of the site. Proponent: Mr. Brad Plemmons, 101 T Street, Auburn, WA 98002 Ph. 206-293-1434 Location: The subject property is located along the south side of SW Campus Drive at the intersection of 10`h Avenue SW. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 12`' Avenue: SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, Washington, King County tax parcel numbers 192104-9044 and 192104-9030, in the NW'/4 of Section 19, T21N, R4E, WM. Lead Agency: City of Federal Way City Contact: Jim Harris, Senior Planner (253-835-2641, or jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com) MITIGATION MEASURES (SUMMARY): Clearing, grading, and street/utility work for the plat improvements is not permitted from October 31 to March 30, unless approved in writing by the Public Works Director. 2. The applicant shall construct the five City Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) projects impacted by the proposal, or, in lieu of constructing these TIP projects, prior to final plat approval, the applicant may voluntarily pay a pro-rata share contribution of $98,688.00 for the 44 single-family lots, and $20,554.00 for the multi -family project toward construction of the impacted TIP projects. 3. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall construct two speed humps in accordance with City standards on SW 3401h Street between 13`h Court SW and 19`b Avenue SW. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community Development Services (Federal Way City Hall, 33325 8P Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on September 15, 2004. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the comment deadline. Any person aggrieved by the City's determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on September 1, 2004. 03-102631 Doc. I.D. 28348 41k CITY OF Federal Way COPY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Wynstone Preliminary Plat Federal Way File No. 03-102631-00-SE NOTE: The purpose of this Final Staff Evaluation is to provide technical staff evaluation of the proposed action, supplement information contained in the environmental checklist and expanded studies, provide technical information unavailable to the applicant, correct inaccurate information, and recommend measures to the responsible official to mitigate identified environmental impacts. Technical reports and attachments referenced herein and in the environmental checklist may not be attached to all copies of this evaluation. Copies of reports, attachments, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting Jim Harris, Senior Planner, at the City, of Federal Way, Department of Community Development Services, 33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, Washington, 98063-9718, 253-835-2641 orjimharris(&,cityoffederalway.com. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposed action includes subdividing approximately 13.5 acres into 45 separate lots. Proposed lots numbered 1 — 44 are for single-family use, and lot number 45 is for multi -family development. The proposed single-family lots range •in size from 5,000 square feet to 17,185 square feet in size. The proposal also includes developing an internal road system, street frontage improvements on Campus Drive SW, construction of 10th/12`' SW through the site, traffic signal modifications at the intersection of 10`h Avenue SW and Campus Drive, utility construction, storm drainage control improvements, and other related infrastructure improvements. The proposed action includes construction of up to 18 multi -family dwelling units on proposed lot number 45. The proposed action also includes amending the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement for a portion of the site. LIST OF TECHNICAL REPORTS The following technical information was submitted as part of the development application: Environmental Checklist, submitted by Jaeger Engineering, dated revised August 20, 2004. Wynstone Preliminary Plat Map by Jaeger Engineering, sheet 1 of 1, revised May 10, 2004. Wynstone Preliminary Roads, Drainage and Utilities Plan by Jaeger Engineering, sheet 1 of 1, revised May 20, 2004. Wynstone Preliminary Grading Plan by Jaeger Engineering, sheet 1 of 1, revised August 20, 2004. reliminary Grading Cross Sections by Jaeger Engineering, sheet 1 of 1, revised May 20, Wynstone,'.. 2004. Wynstone Preliminary Plat Road Profiles by Jaeger Engineering, sheets 1 - 3, revised December 10, 2003. Wynstone Existing Tree Plan by Jaeger Engineering, sheet 1 of 1, March 14, 2003. Wynstone Landscape Plan by Eagle Design, sheet L-I of 1, April 23, 2003. Preliminary Technical Information Report for Wynstone Preliminary Plat, by Jaeger Engineering, dated revised December 10, 2003. Traffic Impact Analysis for Wynstone, prepared by Christopher Brown and Associates, March 31, 2004. Wetland and Drainage Corridor Assessment for Rachel Ridge (aka Wynstone), by Habitat Technologies, April 8, 2003. Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Evaluation, by Berquist Engineering Services, December 15, 2003. Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Evaluation, by Berquist Engineering Services, April 15, 2004. Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Evaluation, by Berquist Engineering Services, August 19, 2004. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Wynstone Preliminary Plat, and 18-Unit Multi -Family Development Applicant: Brad Plemmons 101 T Street SE Auburn, WA 98002 206-293-1434 Engineer: Jim Jaeger Jaeger Engineering 9419 South 2041h Place Kent, WA 98031 253-850-0934 Location: The subject property is located along the south side of SW Campus Drive at the intersection of 101h Avenue. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 12th Avenue SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, Washington, King County tax parcel numbers 192104-9044 and 192104-9030, in the NW'/4 of Section 19, T21N, R4E, WM. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / mG I.D. 28387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 2 Zoning: RS 7.2 (Residential Single -Family) and RM 2400 With Concomitant Zoning Agreement Comprehensive Plan Designation: High Density Single -Family and Multi -Family BACKGROUND The application for preliminary plat approval was submitted on June 26, 2003. The proposal has been reviewed by the City's Development Review Committee (CDRC), which includes representatives from the Lakehaven Utility District, Federal Way Fire Department, Federal Way School District, and staff from the City's Public Works, Community Development Services, and Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Departments. Pursuant to procedural requirements contained in the Federal Way City Code (FWCC), the City deemed the application complete on September 10, 2003. Following the determination of application completeness, on September 13, 2003, a preliminary plat notice of application was published in the Federal Way Mirror, sent to property owners within 300 feet of the site, and posted on the site, City Hall, and local libraries. ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Following are staff responses to the elements of the enclosed environmental checklist indicating whether or not City staff concurs with the applicant's response to the checklist item, or staff clarification or amendment of the response. A. Background 1-5. Concur with the checklist. The timing of the project as stated in the environmental checklist is the applicant's estimate. The actual timing may depend, in part, on a variety of factors that are not within the control of either the applicant or the City. 7. Concur with checklist. 8. Concur with checklist. Additionally, as identified in the List of Technical Reports above, a number of studies have been prepared. 9-10. The application includes a request for an amendment to the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement (CZA) that applies to the northerly parcel that is zoned RM2400*. The asterisk (*) denotes the site is governed by a CZA. 11-12. Concur with the checklist. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / no.. I.D. 28387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 3 B. Environmental Elements 1. Earth The City of Federal Way Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map does not reveal this site to be in a problem area relative to landslide, seismic hazard, erosion, steep slope hazards, or 100-year flood plain. However, as noted on the SEPA checklist, a portion of the site near SW Campus Drive has a slope of approximately 50 percent, which constitutes a Geologically Hazardous Area (steep slope) under the Federal Way City Code. The geologic conditions and geotechnical recommendations are summarized in the December 15, 2003, Berquist Engineering Geotechnical Exploration and Evaluation, and Berquist letters dated April 15, 2004 and August 19, 2004. The Berquist report provides recommendations for structural setbacks from cuts and fill slopes, setbacks from retaining walls, and the report includes recommendations regarding construction observation and testing. Further review of the proposal for conformance with the FWCC Geologically Hazardous Areas requirements will occur in conjunction with further review of the preliminary plat application. The proposal includes the establishment of impervious surfaces including streets and sidewalks. Future building on each of the proposed lots will result in further impervious area at the site. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-631 note 5, future development of each future single-family lot is limited to 60 percent lot coverage. The engineer estimates that approximately 50 percent of the site will be impervious surface following buildout of the site. The clearing and grading limits proposed on the preliminary engineering plans request clearing and grading the infrastructure areas and approximately half the proposed lots. In accordance with FWCC requirements, the clearing and grading limits will be further evaluated and discussed in the preliminary plat application staff report and staff recommendation to the Hearing Examiner. Generally, FWCC Section 20-179 requires the retention of mature vegetation to the maximum extent possible. Soil -disturbing activities could result in erosion and transport of sediment. The effects of this project construction can be addressed through the establishment of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESC) and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during plat infrastructure construction, and permanent stormwater management facilities post - construction. In addition, due to the infiltration facilities downstream at Panther Lake, in order to mitigate potential impacts to stormwater infiltration, site clearing and grading shall be restricted to "dry season" months. Additional storm drainage measures should be implemented and a careful evaluation done in order to allow clearing, grading, and street/utilitywork for the plat improvements during the wet season. The TESC and SWPPP plans are required to be approved and implemented. in accordance with the City's engineering standards in conjunction with plat infrastructure construction. Further review and analysis of the proposed retaining walls and rockeries will occur in conjunction with the preliminary plat review. Additionally, erosion control plans are required to be implemented on each individual lot during home construction. Following plat infrastructure construction and recording of the final plat, building permits for construction on each of the lots will result in additional clearing and grading on each individual lot. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / Doc. ED 28387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 4 In order to mitigate identified potential erosion impacts, the project should be subject to seasonal restrictions on clearing, grading, and street/utilitywork, due to the infiltration facilities downstream at Panther Lake. Compliance with local, state, and federal standards, and a seasonal clearing and grading restriction as conditioned below from October 31 to March 30, will provide sufficient mitigation of potential erosion and earth impacts. Federal Way's 2002 Comprehensive Plan Policies adopted by Federal Way, and contained within the 2002 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), serve as a basis for the exercise of substantive SEPA authority to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions applicable to potential adverse environmental impacts resulting from this project. The following policies of the FWCP support the condition for the development. Natural Environment Policy 2 (NEP2): Preserve and restore ecological functions and enhance natural beauty by encouraging community development patterns and site planning that maintains and complements natural landforms. NEP20: The City should encourage the retention of surface water runoff in wetlands in regional retention facilities, and in detention ponds, or use other similar stormwater management techniques to promote aquifer recharge. Based on the above policies, the following mitigation measure should be required to minimize identified potential adverse erosion impacts: SEPA Conditions - In order to mitigate potential erosion impacts to the infiltration facilities downstream at Panther Lake, clearing, grading, and street/utility work for the plat improvements is not permitted from October 31 to March 30, unless approved in writing by the Public Works Director. 2. Air Short-term air quality impacts will result during site preparation and grading, building construction, and paving operations. Longer term impacts due. to vehicle emissions will vary in level according to the amount of traffic generation in the future by the proposal. Construction activity contributes to carbon monoxide levels through the operation of construction machinery, delivery equipment and materials, and worker access to the site by automobile. These activities also include the emissions of hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen,._ potentially elevating the level of photochemical oxidants, such as ozone, in the ambient air. Long-term impacts, due to traveling to and from the site by automobile will be similar to those typically found in developments of this type. Compliance with local (FWCC Section 22-947), state, and federal air quality standards will provide sufficient mitigation of potential on -site construction activities and long-term site usage. In addition, retention and enhancement of site landscaping will provide filtering of suspended particles. 3. Water a. Surface As identified in the April 8, 2003, Habitat Technologies Assessment, there are no regulated streams or regulated wetlands on the site. There is a portion of a wetland buffer Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / Doe. I.D. 28387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 5 that extends onto the southwest corner of the site. The 100-foot wetland buffer has been identified on the preliminary. plat map, and there are no intrusions or improvements proposed within the 100-foot wetland setback. Panther Lake is located approximately 1,500 feet downstream from the Wynstone site. K Ground Concur with the checklist. There are no proposed groundwater withdrawals or discharges. Domestic water needs for the proposed 45-lot subdivision will be provided by the Lakehaven Utility District. Domestic sewage generated by the project will be collected and conveyed through Lakehaven Utility District mains to the wastewater treatment facility. C. Water Runoff The applicant has provided a Preliminary Technical Information Report, by Jaeger Engineering, revised December 10, 2003, supplemented on May 27, 2004. Since the proposed development creates more than 5,000 square feet of impervious surface, surface water runoff control and water quality treatment will be required per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the City's April 1999 addendum. In order to comply with the City's drainage requirements, the applicant addressed the eight core and five special requirements of the KCSWDM. The applicant has proposed in their TIR to comply with the KCSWDM for on -site storm drainage facilities. As with all paved, developed areas, the site will contribute some pollutants to ground and surface waters, as these will be washed off the parking and vehicular areas by stormwater into the drainage system. Pollutants, which accumulate on paved surfaces, may include heavy metals, petrochemicals, and other substances. This site is required to provide water quality treatment consistent with the. Resource Stream Protection Menu provided in the KCSWDM. Consistent with these requirements, all surface water runoff from the paved portions of the project will be treated by a stormwater wetland, which is shown as Stream Protection Option 2 for the Resource Stream Protection Menu. The portion within the preliminary plat that is zoned for Multi -family development will require a separate water quality facility. This water quality facility shall be designed from the Resource Stream Protection Menu, per the 1998 KCSWDM. The applicant has selected to utilize the Panther Lake Regional stormwater facility to meet stormwater detention requirements, per the 1998 KCSWDM. This shall include the reconstruction of any existing portions of the conveyance system along SW Campus Drive as needed to accommodate the increase in runoff downstream to Panther Lake. The applicant shall be required to pay the pro-rata share of $1,728/acre to the City for offsite detention. Final review of the stormwater quality and detention will occur in conjunction with the final engineering plan review. Compliance with local, state, and federal standards, will sufficiently mitigate stormwater impacts from the project. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / n«. i.n. 2s3s7 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 6 4. Plants a-d. Plants located at the subject property are identified in the environmental checklist and Habitat Technologies Report. The response in the SEPA checklist identifies that a portion of the existing vegetation will be removed for the grading and construction of the project. Ultimately, development of the site will likely result in the retention of few, if any, significant trees and vegetation in the developed portion of the site and on future individual lots. Trees that may be left on individual lots during the plat infrastructure construction phase may be, and likely will be, removed during individual home construction. Any significant trees removed during individual home construction will be subject to the significant tree retention and replacement standards of FWCC Section 22- 1568. A significant tree inventory has been provided and identifies a total of 630 significant trees on the site. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1568, removal of more than 75 percent of the existing significant trees will require replacement of a minimum of 25 percent of the number of existing significant trees. Further review and evaluation of the significant tree retention and replacement will occur in conjunction with the preliminary plat review and staff recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and must comply with FWCC Section 22- 1568 and FWCC Section 20-179. An approved landscape plan, in accordance with FWCC Chapter 22, Article XVII, is required for this project. A preliminary landscape plan -has been submitted in conjunction with the application. Areas that trust be landscaped include the on -site storm drainage pond and street trees along public roads. In addition, the current CZA discusses landscape _ buffer requirements along Campus Drive and between the -multi -family and single-family zones. Further review of the landscape requirements will occur in conjunction with the requested CZA amendment and preliminary plat review. Final review and approval of the required landscaping and significant tree retention and replacement will occur with the detailed engineering plan review, following review of the preliminary plat. Landscaping of individual future lots will occur in conjunction with future single-family home construction on individual lots. 5. Animals a-d. The site currently provides habitat for small mammals, rodents, and reptiles, as well as songbirds and insects. Some of these animals will be eliminated or displaced by the proposal. In addition, the introduction of human. activities, including domestic animals, to the site will threaten the viability of any remaining habitat. No wildlife species recognized as priority species are known to inhabit the site. Further, the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW) priority habitat and species map does not indicate the presence of threatened, endangered, or sensitive species of wildlife within a mile of the site. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a-c. Concur with the checklist. Energy provisions for the project shall conform to applicable local, state, and federal regulations. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 /Doc. I D. 28387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 7 7. Environmental Health a. Environmental Health Hazards Concur with the checklist. The risk of environmental health hazards is always present during construction projects. Compliance with applicable local, state, and federal regulations will sufficiently mitigate the potential for significant adverse environmental impacts. b. Noise During construction, noise levels will increase on the site due to construction activity. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1006, construction activity and the operation of any heavy equipment will be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, with such activities being prohibited on Sundays or on holidays observed by the City, unless an exception is granted by the City of Federal Way's Community Development Services Director. S. Land and Shoreline Use Concur with the checklist. The proposal is subject to preliminary and final plat review, and the applicant has requested to amend provisions of the CZA relating to housing type (land use), density, landscaping, phased construction, setbacks, road improvements, and right-of-way dedication. As a result of the review process, which includes SEPA review, public notification, input on the SEPA review, public hearing with the Hearing Examiner, and final review and decision by the Federal Way City Council, compliance with all code requirements will be ensured and all potentially adverse environmental impacts will be addressed. No further mitigation is necessary. 9. Housing The project description in item A 11 identifies up to 18 multi -family units will be constructed and the response in this section of the checklist identifies 17 attached multi -family units. The gross density permitted on proposed lot number 45, based on the existing RM 2400 zoning, is 18 units. Compliance with applicable codes and the CZA, as amended, will mitigate any potential housing impacts. 10. Aesthetics Concur with the checklist. Compliance with applicable codes including the City's Community Design Guidelines for the future multi -family lot and compliance with the CMP, as approved and amended by the City Council, wi 11 sufficiently mitigate visual impacts of the site development. City staff will evaluate the appearance of any proposed retaining walls for compliance with applicable City codes and policies in conjunction with review and recommendation of the preliminary plat review and concomitant zoning agreement amendment. 11. Light and Glare The project lighting must comply with FWCC Sections 22-950 and 22-954, which regulate off - site lighting and glare. Compliance with applicable lighting regulations in FWCC will sufficiently mitigate project impacts. 12. Recreation No on -site recreation facilities are proposed at this time. The applicant has requested to provide a fee-in-liep of providing on -site open space in accordance with FWCC Section 20-155. The open Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / Mc. LD. 28387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 8 space fee is calculated on 15 percent of the most recent assessed value of the property at the time of final plat approval. The proposed multi -family project must comply with applicable multi- family development FWCC provisions for recreational open space. Compliance with applicable FWCC provisions for open space will sufficiently mitigate recreation impacts. No further mitigation is necessary. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation Concur with the checklist. No significant adverse historic and cultural preservation impacts are anticipated. Therefore, no mitigation measures are necessary. 14. Transportation Based on the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), prepared by Christopher Brown & Associates, March 31, 2004, the single-family portion of the development would generate 51 new weekday evening peak hour trips, and the multi -family portion of the development would generate 12 new weekday evening peak hour trips. The new trips generated by the development would have significant impact on the City's transportation network. The City of Federal Way has identified four TIP projects impacted by 10 or more trips. Compliance with local, state, federal standards, and the following mitigation measure (based on the policies below) should be required to minimize identified potential adverse traffic impacts: SEPA Conditions - In order to mitigate for the adverse transportation impacts of the new trips generated by the development on existing transportation network, prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall: 1. Construct impacted TIP projects at the following locations: a. South 348'h Street from 91h Avenue South to SR 99: Add HOV lanes, install raised median, underground utilities, add northbound left -turn at SR 99. This project is impacted by 17 trips from the single-family component, and five trips from the multi- family component of the development. b. South 356`h Street from Is' Avenue South to SR 99: Widen to five lanes with bike lanes. This project is impacted by 12 trips from the single-family component, and two trips from the multi -family component of the development. C. South 34e Street at I" Avenue South: Add 2nd left -turn lanes eastbound, westbound, southbound, and westbound and southbound right -turn lanes. This project is impacted by 25 trips from the single-family component, and six trips from the multi -family component of the development. d. 12'h Avenue SW / SW 340 Street from SW Campus Drive to 2 1 " Avenue SW: Extend 3-lane street. Three different segments of this project are impacted as follows: i. 12'h Avenue SW between SW Campus Drive and SW 340`h Street is impacted by 45 trips from the single-family component, and 10 trips from the multi- family component of the development. The development would construct this segment of the project, therefore no mitigation is required. ii. 12`h Avenue SW between SW 340`h Street and SW 344`' Street is impacted by 18 trips from the single-family component, and four trips from the multi -family component. This development would construct a portion of this segment, and the remainder has been constructed by another development. Therefore, no mitigation is required for this segment. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-10263 1/ nog. I.D. 29387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 9 iii. SW 3446' Street from 12'h Avenue SW to 21"Avenue SW would be impacted by six trips from the single-family component and two trips from the multi- family component. Since this segment is impacted by less than 10 trips, no mitigation is required for this segment of the project. e. SR 18 at SR 161; Add 3rd westbound left -turn lane, eastbound and westbound right - turn lanes, add third southbound lane on SR 161 to South 352nd Street. This project is impacted by 11 trips from the single-family component, and three trips from the multi -family component of the development. Channelization and street improvement plans shall be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the State of Washington and submitted for City of Federal Way's review and approval in concurrence with plat infrastructure construction, and constructed prior to final plat approval. In lieu of constructing the impacted TIP improvement projects, prior to final plat approval, the applicant may voluntarily pay the project's pro-rata share contribution for the single-family (SF) portion of the proposal. In lieu of constructing the impacted TIP improvement projects, prior to issuance of construction permits for the multi -family (MF) project, the applicant may voluntarily pay the project's pro-rata share contribution for the multi -family portion of the proposal. The pro-rata share contribution for each project is calculated based on the formula below: Fair share contribution = Project generated PM peak trips Projected Total PM peak traffic These are calculated per the table below: x (F project cost— value of right-of-way and frontage improvements) TIP Project Project Name Project Cost Project Background Percent Fair -Share ID Trips Volume Impact Contribution 6 S 340 St: $4,350,000 17 SF 3553 0.3% SF $20,813 SF 9" Ave S — SR 99 5 MF 0.1 % MF $6,122 MF 11 S 356 St: $8,905,000 12 SF 1750 0.7% SF $61,063 SF V! Ave S — SR 99 2 MF i 0.1 % MF $10,177 MF 13 S 348 St @ $1,800,000 25 SF 4459 0.6% SF $10,092 SF Vt Ave S 6 MF 0.1 % MF $2,422 MF 20 SR 18 @ SR 161 $3,350,000 11 SF 5459 0.2% SF $6,720 SF 3 MF 0.1%MF $1,833 MF TOTALS $98,688 SF $20,554 MF Cost per Unit $2,243 SF $1,082 MF As required by state law, the City shall refund collected fees if not used for the identified TIP projects within five years. 2. The completion of SW 340`h Street between 121h Avenue SW and 19`h Avenue SW would create a new route between neighborhoods to the south and Saghalie Junior High School, and shopping areas to the west of the development. This could adversely impact the safety of access to the school. Therefore, prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall construct two speed humps in accordance with City standards on SW 340`h Street between 13'' Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / m,. r.o. 2sss7 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 10 Court SW and 19a' Avenue SW to mitigate safety impacts associated with the increase in speed and volume of traffic on SW 340th Street. Federal Way's 2002 Comprehensive Plan Policies adopted by Federal Way, and contained within the 2002 FWCP, serve as a basis for the exercise of substantive SEPA authority to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions applicable to potential adverse environmental impacts resulting from this project. The following goals and policies of the FWCP support the condition for the development. TG1 Maintain mobilityfor residents and businesses through a balanced, integrated system of transportation alternatives that: a. Meet local and regional needs though inter jurisdictionally coordinated and integrated systems. b. Reduces auto dependency, especially SO use. c. Supports the land use vision and plan. d. Protects and enhances the environment and quality of life. e. Provides acceptable levels of service for each transportation mode that is also commensurate with theplanned levels offunding. TPS Protect neighborhoods from traffic impacts. TG2 Provide a safe, efficient, convenient, and financially sustainable transportation system with sufficient capacity to move people, goods, and services at an acceptable level of service. The City shall develop and adopt policies for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and preservation of new and existing facilities. TP10 Protect existing and acquire future right-of-way consistent with functional classification cross-section (transit, rail, bike, and pedestrian) needs. Require developments to dedicate right-of-way as needed for development commensurate with the impacts of the development. At a minimum, setback limits shall be used to assure that buildings are not placed within the right-of-way requirements for planned transportation facilities. Right-of-way dedication shall be commensurate with the developments' impact to the existing and planned transportation system. TP14 Provide access between major development areas identified in the recommended alternative, while improving business access and protecting City neighborhoods. TP16 The City's LOS standard shall be E. This is defined herein as a volume%apacity ratio less than 1.00 in accordance with Highway Capacity Manual (2000) operational analysis procedures. At signalized intersections, the analysis shall be conducted using a 120-second cycle length and level of service E is defined as less than 80 seconds of delay per vehicle. Where transit or HOVfacilities are provided, the LOS shall be measured by average delay and volume%apacity ratio per person rather than per vehicle. This standard shall be used to identify concurrency needs and mitigation of development impacts. For long-range transportation planning, a volume%apacity ratio of 0.90 or greater will be used to identify locations for the more detailed operational analysis. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / Doe. I.D. 28387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 11 TP17 Expand arterial capacity by constructing channelization improvements at intersections when they are an alternative to creating new lanes along a roadway corridor. TP19 Limit single -occupant vehicle capacity increases to those required to maintain the existing LOS, either by providing new streets or by widening existing streets. Maintain existing and preserve future street connections vital to system integrity. TP20 Take advantage of opportunities to open new road connections to create route alternatives, especially in areas with few access choices. TP21 Enhance traffic circulation and access with closer spacing of through streets, unless geographic constraints do not permit. Limit the area to be served by a single access point commensurate with planned density. TP23 Minimize though traffic on residential streets by maximizing through travel opportunities on arterial and collector streets. TP26 Employ traffic calming measures in neighborhoods (where feasible) where traffic volumes and speeds on local streets consistently exceed reasonable levels. TP37 Keep through traffic to state routes and arterials. Discourage the use of local or neighborhood streets for through movements (unless part of an overall process of creating a street grid). TP62 Modem the development review process by: o Incorporating revised impact analysis procedures that comply with GMA concurrency and other requirements. The revisions need to include revised Level of Service standards. o Streamlining it to the extent possible to minimize private development costs. Where developments are consistent with this plan, they should be allowed to proceed by mitigating site impacts; developing appropriate components of the HOV, transit, non -motorized and motorized chapters; and participating in an equitable citywide improvement funding or mitigation payment program. o Incorporating requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. o Requiring explicit consideration of pedestrian and bicycle circulation, as well as parking and general circulation needs. 15. Public Services a-b. Concur with the checklist. Impacts to public services are anticipated to be comparable to service requests from other single-family and -multi -family residential neighborhoods. Compliance with code requirements will sufficiently mitigate any impacts from the proposal. Federal Way Public Schools commented on the school access to the site in a May 21, 2003, letter to the City. Further evaluation of the school access will occur in conjunction with the preliminary plat review and City staff recommendation to the Hearing Examiner. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / na. I.D. 28387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 12 According to the formula used in the Federal Way School District's May 21, 2003, letter to the City of Federal Way, the proposed development will generate approximately 30 school -age children. The collection of school impact fees in accordance with FWCC requirements will mitigate the school impacts. The current school mitigation fee is $3,269.00 for a single-family residence and is collected at building permit issuance for a residence. The Federal Way City Council may adjust the impact fee annually, and the applicable fee would be determined at the time complete individual single-family building permits are submitted to the City. Multi -family school impacts are collected at the time of issuance of building permits for multi -family uses. The current multi -family school impact fee is $940.00 per unit. The Federal Way City Council may adjust the school impact fees annually, and the applicable fee would be determined at the time complete individual building permits are submitted to the City. 16. Utilities a-b. Concur with the checklist. The plat will require construction of all utilities required for a single-family residential subdivision. CONCLUSION Based on staff analysis of the application, the completed SEPA checklist, technical reports, and applicable City regulations and policies, the proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, provided that the mitigation measures are properly implemented pursuant to a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS). The mitigation measures of the MDNS are based upon impacts identified within the environmental checklist, attachments, exhibits, supplemental reports as listed, and the above Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Application, and are supported by plans, policies, and regulations formally adopted by the City for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions. The City reserves the right to review any further revisions or alterations to the site or the proposal in order to determine the environmental significance or nonsignificance of the project at that point in time. Prepared by: Harris, Senior Planner (253-835-2641, jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com) Date: Septem 1, 2004 Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / nog. c.n. 2s3s7 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 13 Federal Way &L, FILE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Wynstone Preliminary Plat Federal Way File No. 03-102631-00-SE NOTE: The purpose of this Final Staff Evaluation is to provide technical staff evaluation of the proposed action, supplement information contained in the environmental checklist and expanded studies, provide technical information unavailable to the applicant, correct inaccurate information, and recommend measures to the responsible official to mitigate identified environmental impacts. Technical reports and attachments referenced herein and in the environmental checklist may not be attached to all copies of this evaluation. Copies of reports, attachments, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting Jim Harris, Senior Planner, at the City of Federal Way, Department of Community Development Services, 33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, Washington, 98063-9718, 253-835-2641 or jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposed action includes subdividing approximately 13.5 acres into 45 separate lots. Proposed lots numbered 1 — 44 are for single-family use, and lot number 45 is for multi -family development. The proposed single-family lots range in size from 5;000 square feet to 17,185 square feet in size. The proposal also includes developing an internal road system, street frontage improvements on Campus Drive SW, construction of 10`h/12" SW through the site, traffic signal modifications at the intersection of 10`h Avenue SW and Campus Drive, utility construction, storm drainage control improvements, and other related infrastructure improvements. The proposed action includes construction of up to 18 multi -family dwelling units on proposed lot number 45. The proposed action also includes amending the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement for a portion of the site. LIST OF TECHNICAL REPORTS The following technical information was submitted as part of the development application: Environmental Checklist, submitted by Jaeger Engineering, dated revised August 20, 2004. Wynstone Preliminary Plat Map by Jaeger Engineering, sheet 1 of 1, revised May 10, 2004. Wynstone Preliminary Roads, Drainage and Utilities Plan by Jaeger Engineering, sheet 1 of 1, revised May 20, 2004. Wynstone Preliminary Grading Plan by Jaeger Engineering, sheet 1 of 1, revised August 20, 2004. Wynstone P I liminary Grading Cross Sections by Jaeger Engineering, sheet 1 of 1, revised May 20, 2004. Wynstone Preliminary Plat Road Profiles by Jaeger Engineering, sheets 1 - 3, revised December 10, 2003. Wynstone Existing Tree Plan by Jaeger Engineering, sheet 1 of 1, March 14, 2003. Wynstone Landscape Plan by Eagle Design, sheet L-1 of 1, April 23, 2003. Preliminary Technical Information Report for Wynstone Preliminary Plat, by Jaeger Engineering, dated revised December 10, 2003. Traffic Impact Analysis for Wynstone, prepared by Christopher Brown and Associates, March 31, 2004. Wetland and Drainage Corridor Assessment for Rachel Ridge (aka Wynstone), by Habitat Technologies, April 8, 2003. Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Evaluation, by Berquist Engineering Services, December 15, 2003. Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Evaluation, by Berquist Engineering Services, April 15, 2004. Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Evaluation, by Berquist Engineering Services, August 19, 2004. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Wynstone Preliminary Plat, and 18-Unit Multi -Family Development Applicant: Brad Plemmons 101 T Street SE Auburn, WA 98002 206-293-1434 Engineer: Jim Jaeger Jaeger Engineering 9419 South 2041h Place Kent, WA 98031 253-850-0934 Location: The subject property is located along the south side of SW Campus Drive at the intersection of 10`h Avenue. The site also abuts the northerly terminus of 12`h Avenue SW at approximately the 34000 block (north of the plat of Orchid Lane), in Federal Way, Washington, King County tax parcel numbers 192104-9044 and 192104-9030, in the NW'/4 of Section 19, T21N, R4E, WM. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / D . I.D. 28387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 2 Zoning: RS 7.2 (Residential Single -Family) and RM 2400 With Concomitant Zoning Agreement Comprehensive Plan Designation: High Density Single -Family and Multi -Family BACKGROUND The application for preliminary plat approval was submitted on June 26, 2003. The proposal has been reviewed by the City's Development Review Committee (CDRC), which includes representatives from the Lakehaven Utility District, Federal Way Fire Department, Federal Way School District, and staff from the City's Public Works, Community Development Services, and Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Departments. Pursuant to procedural requirements contained in the Federal Way City Code (FWCC), the City deemed the application complete on September 10, 2003. Following the determination of application completeness, on September 13, 2003, a preliminary plat notice of application was published in the Federal Way Mirror, sent to property owners within 300 feet of the site, and posted on the site, City Hall, and local libraries. ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Following are staff responses to the elements of the enclosed environmental checklist indicating whether or not City staff concurs with the applicant's response to the checklist item, or staff clarification or amendment of the response. A. Background 1-5. Concur with the checklist. 6. The timing of the project as stated in the environmental checklist is the applicant's estimate. The actual timing may depend, in part, on a variety of factors that are not within the control of either the applicant or the City. Concur with checklist. Concur with checklist. Additionally, as identified in the List of Technical Reports above, a number of studies have been prepared. 9-10. The application includes a request for an amendment to the existing Concomitant Zoning Agreement (CZA) that applies to the northerly parcel that is zoned RM2400*. The asterisk (*) denotes the site is governed by a CZA. 11-12. Concur with the checklist. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / Doc. I.n.28397 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 3 B. Environmental Elements 1. Earth The City of Federal Way Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map does not reveal this site to be in a problem area relative to landslide, seismic hazard, erosion, steep slope hazards, or 100-year flood plain. However, as noted on the SEPA checklist, a portion of the site near SW Campus Drive has a slope of approximately 50 percent, which constitutes a Geologically Hazardous Area (steep slope) under the Federal Way City Code. The geologic conditions and geotechnical recommendations are summarized in the December 15, 2003, Berquist Engineering Geotechnical Exploration and Evaluation, and Berquist letters dated April 15, 2004 and August 19, 2004. The Berquist report provides recommendations for structural setbacks from cuts and fill slopes, setbacks from retaining walls, and the report includes recommendations regarding construction observation and testing. Further review of the proposal for conformance with the FWCC Geologically Hazardous Areas requirements will occur in conjunction with further review of the preliminary plat application. The proposal includes the establishment of impervious surfaces including streets and sidewalks. Future building on each of the proposed lots will result in further impervious area at the site. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-631 note 5, future development of each future single-family lot is limited to 60 percent lot coverage. The engineer estimates that approximately 50 percent of the site will be impervious surface following buildout of the site. The clearing and grading limits proposed on the preliminary engineering plans request clearing and grading the infrastructure areas and approximately half the proposed lots. In accordance with FWCC requirements, the clearing and grading limits will be further evaluated and discussed in the preliminary plat application staff report and staff recommendation to the Hearing Examiner. Generally, FWCC Section 20-179 requires the retention of mature vegetation to the maximum extent possible. Soil -disturbing activities could result in erosion and transport of sediment. The effects of this project construction can be addressed through the establishment of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESC) and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during plat infrastructure construction, and permanent stormwater management facilities post - construction. In addition, due to the infiltration facilities downstream at Panther Lake, in order to mitigate potential impacts to stormwater infiltration, site clearing and grading shall be restricted to "dry season" months. Additional storm drainage measures should be implemented and a careful evaluation done in order to allow clearing, grading, and street/utilitywork for the plat improvements during the wet season. The TESC and SWPPP plans are required to be approved and implemented in accordance with the City's engineering standards in conjunction with plat infrastructure construction. Further review and analysis of the proposed retaining walls and rockeries will occur in conjunction with the preliminary plat review. Additionally, erosion control plans are required to be implemented on each individual lot during home construction. Following plat infrastructure construction and recording of the final plat, building permits for construction on each of the lots will result in additional clearing and grading on each individual lot. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / m.. t.n. 29387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 4 In order to mitigate identified potential erosion impacts, the project should be subject to seasonal restrictions on clearing, grading, and street/utilitywork, due to the infiltration facilities downstream at Panther Lake. Compliance with local, state, and federal standards, and a seasonal clearing and grading restriction as conditioned below from October 31 to March 30, will provide sufficient mitigation of potential erosion and earth impacts. Federal Ways 2002 Comprehensive Plan Policies adopted by Federal Way, and contained within the 2002 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), serve as a basis for the exercise of substantive SEPA authority to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions applicable to potential adverse environmental impacts resulting from this project. The following policies of the FWCP support the condition for the development. Natural Environment Policy 2 (7VEP2): Preserve and restore ecological functions and enhance natural beauty by encouraging community development patterns and site planning that maintains and complements natural landforms. NEP20: The City should encourage the retention of surface water runoff in wetlands in regional.retention facilities, and in detention ponds, or use other similar stormwater management techniques to promote aquifer recharge. Based on the above policies, the following mitigation measure should be required to minimize identified potential adverse erosion impacts: SEPA- Conditions - In order to mitigate potential erosion impacts to the infiltration facilities downstream at Panther Lake, clearing, grading, and street/utility work for the plat improvements is not permitted from October 31 to March 30, unless approved in writing by the Public Works Director. 2. Air Short-term air quality impacts will result during site preparation and grading, building construction, and paving operations. Langer ternn impacts due to vehicle emissions will vary in level according to the amount of traffic generation in the future by the proposal. Construction activity contributes to carbon monoxide levels through the operation of construction machinery, delivery equipment and materials, and worker access to the site by automobile. These activities also include the emissions of hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen, potentially elevating the level of photochemical oxidants, such as ozone, in the ambient air. Long-term impacts, due to traveling to and from the site by automobile will be similar to those typically found in developments of this type. Compliance with local (FWCC Section 22-947), state, and federal air quality standards will provide sufficient mitigation of potential on -site construction activities and long-term site usage. In addition, retention and enhancement of site landscaping will provide filtering of suspended particles. 3. Water a. Surface As identified in the April 8, 2003, Habitat Technologies Assessment, there are no regulated streams or regulated wetlands on the site. There is a portion of a wetland buffer Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / nog. I.D. 28387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 5 that extends onto the southwest corner of the site. The 100-foot wetland buffer has been identified on the preliminary plat map, and there are no intrusions or improvements proposed within the 100-foot wetland setback. Panther Lake is located approximately 1,500 feet downstream from the Wynstone site. b. Ground Concur with the checklist. There are no proposed groundwater withdrawals or discharges. Domestic water needs for the proposed 45-lot subdivision will be provided by the Lakehaven Utility District. Domestic sewage generated by the project will be collected and conveyed through Lakehaven Utility District mains to the wastewater treatment facility. C. Water Runoff The applicant has provided a Preliminary Technical Information Report, by Jaeger Engineering, revised December 10, 2003, supplemented on May 27, 2004. Since the proposed development creates more than 5,000 square feet of impervious surface, surface water runoff control and water quality treatment will be required per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the City's April 1999 addendum. In order to comply with the City's drainage requirements, the applicant addressed the eight core and five special requirements of the KCSWDM. The applicant has proposed in their TIR to comply with the KCSWDM for on -site storm drainage facilities. As with all paved, developed areas, the site will contribute some pollutants to ground and surface waters, as these will be washed off the parking and vehicular areas by stormwater into the drainage system. Pollutants, which accumulate on paved surfaces, may include heavy metals, petrochemicals, and other substances. This site is required to provide water quality treatment consistent with the Resource Stream Protection Menu provided in the KCSWDM. Consistent with these requirements, all surface water runoff from the paved portions of the project will be treated by a stormwater wetland, which is shown as Stream Protection Option 2 for the Resource Stream Protection Menu. The portion within the preliminary plat that is zoned for Multi -family development will require a separate water quality facility. This water quality facility shall be designed from the Resource Stream Protection Menu, per the 1998 KCSWDM. The applicant has selected to utilize the Panther Lake Regional stormwater facility to meet stormwater detention requirements, per the 1998 KCSWDM. This shall include the reconstruction of any existing portions of the conveyance system along SW Campus Drive as needed to accommodate the increase in runoff downstream to Panther Lake. The applicant shall be required to pay the pro-rata share of $1,728/acre to the City for offsite detention. Final review of the stormwater quality and detention will occur in conjunction with the final engineering plan review. Compliance with local, state, and federal standards, will sufficiently mitigate stormwater impacts from the project. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / no.. i.n. 2s3s7 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 6 4. Plants a-d. Plants located at the subject property are identified in the environmental checklist and Habitat Technologies Report. The response in the SEPA checklist identifies that a portion of the existing vegetation will be removed for the grading and construction of the project. Ultimately, development of the site will likely result in the retention of few, if any, significant trees and vegetation in the developed portion of the site and on future individual lots. Trees that may be left on individual lots during the plat infrastructure construction phase may be, and likely will be, removed during individual home construction. Any significant trees removed during individual home construction will be subject to the significant tree retention and replacement standards of FWCC Section 22- 1568. A significant tree inventory has been provided and identifies a total of 630 significant trees on the site. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1568, removal of more than 75 percent of the existing significant trees will require replacement of a minimum of 25 percent of the number of existing significant trees. Further review and evaluation of the significant tree retention and replacement will occur in conjunction with the preliminary plat review and staff -recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and must comply with FWCC Section 22- 1568 and FWCC Section 20-179. An approved landscape plan, in accordance with FWCC Chapter 22, Article XVII, is required for this project. A preliminary landscape plan has been submitted in conjunction with the application. Areas that must be landscaped include the on -site storm drainage pond and street trees along public roads. In addition, the current CZA discusses landscape buffer requirements along Campus Drive and between the multi -family and single-family zones. Further review of the landscape requirements will occur in conjunction with the requested CZA amendment and preliminary plat review. Final review and approval of the required landscaping and significant tree retention and replacement will occur with the detailed engineering plan review, following review of the preliminary plat. Landscaping of individual future lots will occur in conjunction with future single-family home construction on individual lots. 5. Animals a-d. The site currently provides habitat for small mammals, rodents, and reptiles, as well as songbirds and insects. Some of these animals will be eliminated or displaced by the proposal. In addition, the introduction of human activities, including domestic animals, to the site will threaten the viability of any remaining habitat. No wildlife species recognized as priority species are known to inhabit the site. Further, the Washington State Department. of Fish and Wildlife ()ATDFW) priority habitat and species map does not indicate the presence of threatened, endangered, or sensitive species of wildlife within a mile of the site. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a-c. Concur with the checklist. Energy provisions for the project shall conform to applicable local, state, and federal regulations. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / n«. Ln.28387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 7 7. Environmental Health a. Environmental Health Hazards Concur with the checklist. The risk of environmental health hazards is always present during construction projects. Compliance with applicable local, state, and federal regulations will sufficiently mitigate the potential for significant adverse environmental impacts. b. Noise During construction, noise levels will increase on the site due to construction activity. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1006, construction activity and the operation of any heavy equipment will be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, with such activities being prohibited on Sundays or on holidays observed by the City, unless an exception is granted by the City of Federal Way's Community Development Services Director. 8. Land and Shoreline Use Concur with the checklist. The proposal is subject to preliminary and final plat review, and the applicant has requested to amend provisions of the CZA relating to housing type (land use), density, landscaping, phased construction, setbacks, road improvements, and right-of-way dedication. As a result of the review process, which includes SEPA review, public notification, input on the SEPA review, public hearing with the Hearing Examiner, and final review and decision by the Federal Way City Council, compliance with all code requirements will be ensured and all potentially adverse environmental impacts will be addressed. No further mitigation is necessary. 9. Housing The project description in item A 1 1 identifies up to 18 multi -family units will be constructed and the response in this section of the checklist identifies 17 attached multi -family units. The gross density permitted on proposed lot number 45, based on the existing RM 2400 zoning, is 18 units. Compliance with applicable codes and the CZA, as amended, will mitigate any potential housing impacts. 10. Aesthetics Concur with the checklist. Compliance with applicable codes including the City's Community Design Guidelines for the future multi -family lot and compliance with the CMP, as approved and amended by the City Council, will sufficiently mitigate visual impacts of the site development. City staff will evaluate the appearance of any proposed retaining walls for compliance with applicable City codes and policies in conjunction with review and recommendation of the preliminary plat review and concomitant zoning agreement amendment. 11. Light and Glare The project lighting must comply with FWCC Sections 22-950 and 22-954, which regulate off - site lighting and glare. Compliance with applicable lighting regulations in FWCC will sufficiently mitigate project impacts. 12. Recreation No on -site recreation facilities are proposed at this time. The applicant has requested to provide a fee -in -lieu of providing on -site open space in accordance with FWCC Section 20-155. The open Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / M..I.n, 28387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 8 space fee is calculated on 15 percent of the most recent assessed value of the property at the time of final plat approval. The proposed multi -family project must comply with applicable multi- family development FWCC provisions for recreational open space. Compliance with applicable FWCC provisions for open space will sufficiently mitigate recreation impacts. No further mitigation is necessary. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation Concur with the checklist. No significant adverse historic and cultural preservation impacts are anticipated. Therefore, no mitigation measures are necessary. 14. Transportation Based on the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), prepared by Christopher Brown & Associates, March 31, 2004, the single-family portion of the development would generate 51 new weekday evening peak hour trips, and the multi -family portion of the development would generate 12 new weekday evening peak hour trips. The new trips generated by the development would have significant impact on the City's transportation network. The City of Federal Way has identified four TIP projects impacted by 10 or more trips. Compliance with local, state, federal standards, and the following mitigation measure (based on the policies below) should be required to minimize identified potential adverse traffic impacts: SEPA Conditions - In order to mitigate for the adverse transportation impacts of the new trips generated by the development on existing transportation network, prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall: Construct impacted TIP projects at the following locations: a. South 348 h Street from 9`h Avenue South to SR 99: Add HOV lanes, install raised median, underground utilities, add northbound left -turn at SR 99. This project is impacted by 17 trips from the single-family component, and five trips from the multi- family component of the development. b. South 35e Street from Is' Avenue South to SR 99: Widen to five lanes with bike lanes. This project is impacted by 12 trips from the single-family component, and two trips from the multi -family component of the development. C. South 34e Street at I" Avenue South: Add 2nd left -turn lanes eastbound, westbound, southbound, and westbound and southbound right -turn lanes. This project is impacted by 25 trips from the single-family component, and six trips from the multi -family component of the development. d. 12'h Avenue SW / SW 340 Street from SW Campus Drive to 20 Avenue SW: Extend 3-lane street. Three different segments of this project are impacted as follows: i. 12'h Avenue SW between SW Campus Drive and SW 340`h Street is impacted by 45 trips from the single-family component, and 10 trips from the multi- family component of the development. The development would construct this segment of the project, therefore no mitigation is required. ii. le Avenue SW between SW 340`h Street and SW 344`h Street is impacted by 18 trips from the single-family component, and four trips from the multi -family component. This development would construct a portion of this segment, and the remainder has been constructed by another development. Therefore, no mitigation is required for this segment. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / Dc. I.D. 28387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 9 iii. SW 344`h Street from 12`h Avenue SW to 21' Avenue SW would be impacted by six trips from the single-family component and two trips from the multi- family component. Since this segment is impacted by less than 10 trips, no mitigation is required for this segment of the project. e. SR 18 at SR 161: Add 3rd westbound Ieft-turn lane, eastbound and westbound right - turn lanes, add third southbound lane on SR 161 to South 352nd Street. This project is impacted by 11 trips from the single-family component, and three trips from the multi -family component of the development. Channelization and street improvement plans shall be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the State of Washington and submitted for City of Federal Way's review and approval in concurrence with plat infrastructure construction, and constructed prior to final plat approval. In lieu of constructing the impacted TIP improvement projects, prior to final plat approval, the applicant may voluntarily pay the project's pro-rata share contribution for the single-family (SF) portion of the proposal. In lieu of constructing the impacted TIP improvement projects, prior to issuance of construction permits for the multi -family (MF) project, the applicant may voluntarily pay the project's pro-rata share contribution for the multi -family portion of the proposal. The pro -rats share contribution for each project is calculated based on the formula below: Project generated PM peak trips Fair share contribution =-------.-.----- x (1P project cost —value of right-of-way and frontage improvements) Projected Total PM peak traffic These are calculated per the table below: TIP Project Project Name Project Cost Project Background Percent Fair -Share ID Trips Volume Impact Contribution 6 S 348` St: $4,350,000 17 SF 3553 0.3% SF $20,813 SF 9`h Ave S — SR 99 5 MF 0.1 % MF $6,122 MF 11 S 350St: $8,905,000 12 SF 1750 0.7% SF $61,063 SF ls`Ave S—SR99 2MF 0.1%MF $10,177MF 13 S 348 St @ $1,800,000 25 SF 4459 0.6% SF $10,092 SF I" Ave S 6 MF 0.1 % MF $2,422 MF 20 SR 18 @ SR 161 $3,350,000 11 SF 5459 0.2% SF $6,720 SF 3 MF 0.1%MF $1,833 MF _ TOTALS $98,688 SF $20,554 MF Cost per Unit $2,243 SF $1.082 MF As required by state law, the City shall refund collected fees if not used for the identified TIP projects within five years. 2. The completion of SW 340'h Street between 12'h Avenue SW and 19'h Avenue SW would create a new route between neighborhoods to the south and Saghalie Junior High School, and shopping areas to the west of the development. This could adversely impact the safety of access to the school. Therefore, prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall construct two speed humps in accordance with City standards on SW 340'h Street between 13th Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / D... I.D. 28387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 10 Court SW and 19t' Avenue SW to mitigate safety impacts associated with the increase in speed and volume of traffic on SW 340'' Street. Federal Way's 2002 Comprehensive Plan Policies adopted by Federal Way, and contained within the 2002 FWCP, serve as a basis for the exercise of substantive SEPA authority to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions applicable to potential adverse environmental impacts resulting from this project. The following goals and policies of the FWCP support the condition for the development. TG1 Maintain mobilityfor residents and businesses through a balanced, integrated system of transportation alternatives that. a. Meet local and regional needs though inter jurisdictionally coordinated and integrated systems. b. Reduces auto dependency, especially SO use. c. Supports the land use vision and plan. d. Protects and enhances the environment and quality of life. e. Provides acceptable levels of service for each transportation mode that is also commensurate with theplanned levels offunding. TPS Protect neighborhoods from traffic impacts. TG2 Provide a safe, efficient, convenient, and financially sustainable transportation system with sufficient capacity to move people, goods, and services at an acceptable level of service. The City shall develop and adopt policies for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and preservation of new and existing facilities. TPIO Protect existing and acquire future right-of-way consistent with functional classification cross-section (transit, rail, bike, and pedestrian) needs. Require developments to dedicate right-of-way as needed for development commensurate with the impacts of the development. At a minimum, setback limits shall be used to assure that buildings are not placed within the right-of-way requirements for planned transportation facilities. Right-of-way dedication shall be commensurate with the developments' impact to the existing and planned transportation system. TP14 Provide access between major development areas identified in the recommended alternative, while improving business access and protecting City neighborhoods. TP16 The City's LOS standard shall be E. This is defined herein as a volume%apacity ratio less than 1.00 in accordance with Highway Capacity Manual (2000) operational analysis procedures. At signalized intersections, the analysis shall be conducted using a 120-second cycle length and level of service E is defined as less than 80 seconds of delay per vehicle. Where transit or HOV facilities are provided, the LOS shall be measured by average delay and volume%apacity ratio per person rather than per vehicle. This standard shall be used to identify concurrency needs and mitigation of development impacts. For long-range transportation planning, a volume%apacity ratio of 0.90 or greater will be used to identify locations for the more detailed operational analysis. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / Dm. I.D. 28387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 11 TP17 Expand arterial capacity by constructing channelization improvements at intersections when they are an alternative to creating new lanes along a roadway corridor. TP19 Limit single -occupant vehicle capacity increases to those required to maintain the existing LOS, either by providing new streets or by widening existing streets. Maintain existing and preserve future street connections vital to system integrity. TP20 Take advantage of opportunities to open new road connections to create route alternatives, especially in areas with few access choices. TP21 Enhance traffic circulation and access with closer spacing of through streets, unless geographic constraints do not permit. Limit the area to be served by a single access point commensurate with planned density. TP23 Minimize though traffic on residential streets by maximizing through travel opportunities on arterial and collector streets. TP26 Employ traffic calming measures in neighborhoods (where feasible) where traffic volumes and speeds on local streets consistently exceed reasonable levels. TP37 Keep through traffic to state routes and arterials. Discourage the use of local or neighborhood streets for through movements (unless part of an overall process of creating a street grid). TP62 Modem the development review process by: o Incorporating revised impact analysis procedures that comply with GMA concurrency and other requirements. The revisions need to include revised Level of Service standards. o Streamlining it to the extent possible to minimize private development costs. Where developments are consistent with this plan, they should be allowed to proceed by mitigating site impacts; developing appropriate components of the HOV, transit, non -motorized and motorized chapters; and participating in an equitable citywide improvement funding or mitigation payment program. o Incorporating requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. o Requiring explicit consideration ofpedestrian and bicycle circulation, as well as parking and general circulation needs. 15. Public Services a-b._ Concur with the checklist. Impacts to public services are anticipated to be comparable to service requests from other single-family and multi -family residential neighborhoods. Compliance with code requirements will sufficiently mitigate any impacts from the proposal. Federal Way Public Schools commented on the school access to the site in a May 21, 2003, letter to the City. Further evaluation of the school access will occur in conjunction with the preliminary plat review and City staff recommendation to the Hearing Examiner. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 / Doc. I.D. 28387 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 12 According to the formula used in the Federal Way School District's May 21, 2003, letter to the City of Federal Way, the proposed development will generate approximately 30 school -age children. The collection of school impact fees in accordance with FWCC requirements will mitigate the school impacts. The current school mitigation fee is $3,269.00 for a single-family residence and is collected at building permit issuance for a residence. The Federal Way City Council may adjust the impact fee annually, and the applicable fee would be determined at the time complete individual single-family building permits are submitted to the City. Multi -family school impacts are collected at the time of issuance of building permits for multi -family uses. The current multi -family school impact fee is $940.00 per unit. The Federal Way City Council may adjust the school impact fees annually, and the applicable fee would be determined at the time complete individual building permits are submitted to the City., 16. Utilities a-b. Concur with the checklist. The plat will require construction of all utilities required for a single-family residential subdivision. CONCLUSION Based on staff analysis of the application, the completed SEPA checklist, technical reports, and applicable City regulations and policies, the proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, provided that the mitigation measures are properly implemented pursuant to a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS). The mitigation measures of the MDNS are based upon impacts identified within the environmental checklist, attachments, exhibits, supplemental reports as listed, and the above Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Application, and are supported by plans, policies, and regulations formally adopted by the City for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions. The City reserves the right to review any further revisions or alterations to the site or the proposal in order to determine the environmental significance or nonsignificance of the project at that point in time. Prepared by: Harris, Senior Planner (253-835-2641, jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com) Date: Septem 1, 2004 Final Stan Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 03-102631 /Doc.I.U.2s3s7 Wynstone Preliminary Plat Page 13 1 F11F= CITY OF Federal Way CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com September 1, 2004 Brad Plemmons 101 T Street SE Auburn, WA 98002 RE: File No. 03-102631-000-00-SE; ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Wynstone Subdivison Dear Mr. Plemmons: This office and other City staff have reviewed the environmental checklist and additional information you submitted for the Wynstone preliminary plat. We have determined that the above referenced proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, provided the mitigation measures identified in the enclosed Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) are met. As a result, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A 14-day comment period is required by the SEPA rules (WAC 197-11-340). A notice inviting comments will be published in the Federal Way Mirror on September 1, 2004. At the end of the comment period, the department will determine if the MDNS should be withdrawn, modified, or retained. All final determinations may be appealed within 14 days of the end of the comment period. No licenses, permits, or approvals will be issued until completion of the appeal period. Our decision not to require an EIS does not mean that the license, permit, or approval you are seeking from the City has been granted. Approval or denial of the proposal will be made by the appropriate body vested with that authority. The environmental record is considered by the decision maker(s) and conditions will be imposed to reduce identified environmental impacts, as long as the conditions are based on adopted and designated City policy. After a final decision has been made on your proposal (i.e., after a permit has been issued or City Council action taken, as applicable), you may, but are not required to, publish a Notice of Action as set forth in RCW 43.2 l C.075. The Notice of Action sets forth a time period after which no legal challenges regarding the proposal's compliance with SEPA can be made. A copy of the Notice of Action form and copies of RCW 43.21 C.080 and WAC 197-11-680 providing instructions for giving this notice are available from the Department of Community Development Services. The City is not responsible for publishing the Notice of Action. However, the City is responsible for giving a notice (to parties of record) stating the date for commencing a judicial appeal (including the SEPA portion of that appeal) if your proposal is one for which the City's action on it has a specified time period within which any court appeals must be made. If you need further assistance, please call Jim Harris, Senior Planner, at 253-835-2641. Sincerely, ,�Xdl Kathy McClung, Director Community Development Services enc: MDNS SEPA Staff Evaluation c: Jim Harris, Senior Planner 03-102631 Doc, I,D. 28347 CITY OF Fe d e ra I September 17, 2004 FIL111] CITY HALL Way 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederal wa y. com Mr. Paul Alexander King County Metro Transit 201 South Jackson Street, KSCOTR-0413 Seattle, WA 98104 RE: RESPONSE TO SEPA COMMENTS — WYNSTONE PRELIMINARY PLAT, FILE NO: 03-102631-00-SE Dear Mr. Alexander: Thank you for your comments on the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) decision for the above referenced subdivision proposal. Your comments related primarily to potential impacts to the existing bus stop pad located along Campus Drive. In summary, you requested that the bus pad be replaced if impacted from construction of improvements on Campus Drive. Second, you identified that the proposed housing could increase the use of the bus stop enough to warrant having a passenger shelter in the future. Therefore, you requested the developer to install a shelter footing at the bus stop. The City does not consider the impacts you identified as significant adverse environmental impacts. Therefore, mitigation under SEPA is not appropriate. However, the developer is obligated to replace the bus pad in -kind as a result of road widening. In addition, in conjunction with the review of the preliminary plat, the City will consider requiring installation of a shelter footing under the authority of the platting laws. CONCLUSION The City appreciates the comments provided. After consideration of the comments, however, I am retaining the MDNS as issued and am not modifying the MDNS. Any appeal of the MDNS must be received by September 29, 2004, and include a $102.50 filing fee. If you have any further questions, please contact Jim Harris, Senior Planner, at 253-835-2641, or jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, '46� �&-- OK — Kathy McClung Director of Community Development Services Responsible Environmental Official c: Jim Harris, Senior Planner Ken Miller, Deputy Public Works Director Rick Perez, Traffic Engineer Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Brad Plemmons, 101 T Street SE, Auburn, WA 98002 Enc: KC Metro Comments, September 14, 2004 03-102631 Doc I D. 28911 TO: King County Recorder's Office I am requesting an emergency nonstandard recording for an additional fee as provided in RCW 36.18.010. I understand that the recording processing requirements may cover up or otherwise obscure some part of the text of the original document. S ure of Requestor RCW 36.18.010 Auditor's fees. For recording an emergency nonstandard document as provided in RCW 65.04.0472 fifty dollars, in addition to all other applicable recording fees. RCW 65.04.048 Additional fee for certain documents not meeting requirements -- Signed statement. (1) Documents which must be recorded immediately and which do not meet margin and font size requirements may be recorded for an additional fee of fifty dollars. Documents which do not meet legibility requirements must not be recorded as a nonstandard recording. (2) In addition to preparing a properly completed cover sheet as described in RM 65.04.047, the person preparing the document for recording must sign a statement which must be attached to the document and which must read substantially as follows: "I am requesting an emergency nonstandard recording for an additional fee as provided in RCW 36.18.010. I understand that the recording processing requirements may cover up or otherwise obscure some part of the text of the original document." RECEIVED BY cOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT QEPARTML_:i'vT ASPEN p r o p e r t i e s April 05, 2005 Mr. Jim Harris Senior Planner City of Federal Way Federal Way, Washington 98063-9718 APR 1 3 2005 professional land development and construction management Subject: Campus Crest Subdivision Files: 03-104293-00-SU & 03-104311-00-UP Wynstone Subdivision Files: 03-102630-00-SU & 03-102632-00-UP Dear Mr. Harris, VIA Facsimile: (253) 835-2609 Original: U.S. Mail For the record, please be advised that ownership interest has changed hands for the Campus Crest Subdivision and the Wynstone Subdivision. The former owners and initial applicants Campus Crest LLC., and Brad Plemmons have no further interest in daily undertakings, or any project communique as of this date. Henceforth, all owner communication responsibility will be overseen by Mr. Mike Kerschner of Aspen Properties, NW. Title to both preliminary plats is currently vested in the name of Donald L. Gardner Inc. Communication will be addressed through Aspen Properties NW, a Donald L. Gardner Inc. subsidiary. This letter also serves to notify you that the project engineers of record for the two plats are hereby assigned as fasted below. Also enclosed for your records is a copy of the "Assignment of Development Documents" forms as executed by both previous owners upon the sale of the properties. The form officially designates the new owner as the proprietor of any and all development documents filed with the City to date. 1. Wvnstone Plat: Mr. Jim Jaeger, Jaeger Engineering. Address: 9419 South 204th Pl. Kent, WA. 98031 Telephone: 253 850-0934, E-mail: jjugs dC aol.com 2. Campus Crest Plat: Mr. Seabrook Schilt, CES NW Inc. 5210 12`h Street E. Suite 200 Fife WA. 98424 Telephone: 253 922-1532 E-mail: sschilt0cesnwinc.com Kindest regards, 6J?�4)v,� Donald L. Gardner Aspen Properties, NW Telephone 253 265.1304 • Fax 253 265.1305 •6902 Ford Drive NW • Gig Harbor, WA 98335 Mar 09 05 11a36a Kerschner 25.2 ❑ 7302 p.1 ASSIGNMENT OF DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENTS Brad I Plemmons ("Assignor"), for valuable consideration, hereby grants, conveys, assigns and delivers to DONALD L. GARDNER, INC_, a Washington corporation ("Assignee"), all of Assignor's right, title and interest in and to the following as they relate to the ownership, operation and maintenance of the real property described on attached Exhibit A (the "Property"), to the extent freely transferable by Assignor: All development applications and submittals; government licenses, permits and approvals; development rights; plans, specification and drawings; soils and engineering studies; traffic studies; surveys; appraisals; utility rights and agreements; rights under bonds or similar security arrangements; construction, design and engineering agreements; and other reports and studies regarding the condition and development of the Property (the "Development Documents") - This Assignment shall become effective immediately (the Effective Date"), Assignee hereby accepts this Assignment. Assignor shall deliver to Assignee with this Assignment all funds and documents which are tangible evidence of the Development Documents. Assignor: Brad J_ Plemmons Date:_ r�fDr�r Assignee: DONALD L. GARDNE' By: Date: -t —10 — 0 5 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY WYNSTONE — Federal Way, WA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL 1- That portion of Government Lot I, Section 19, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., records of King county, Washington, said portion being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 19; THENCE along the North line thereof South 89*00' 18" East 335.78 feet: THENCE South 01035' l6" West 42.00 feet to the Southerly margin of the lands described in deed recorded under Recording No. 8501170665, records of King County, Washington; THENCE along said Southerly margin South 89000' 18" East 18.07 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 658.00 feet; THENCE Easterly and Southeasterly 700.54 feet along said curve through a central angle of 60°59'59"; THENCE South 28°00' 19" East 422.43 feet to the true point of beginning and the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeast having a radius of 842.00 feet; THENCE Southeasterly 217.49 feet along said curve through a central angle of 14947'59" to a radial line of said curve which bears South 4711'42" West; THENCE leaving said margin along the non -tangent East line of said Government Lot South 01*13' 12" West 390.17 feet to the Southeast corner thereof, THENCE along the South line of said Government Lot North 8859'20" West 561.92 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave to the Southeast having a radius of 897.03 feet (a radial line through said beginning bears North 74048'34" West); THENCE Northerly and Northeasterly 732.77 feet along said curve through a central angle of 46°48' 15" to the true point of beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington Tax Parcel No. 192104-9044-09 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY WYNSTONE — Federal Way, WA LEGAL DESCRIPTION continued PARCEL2: That portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 19, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., lying Northerly of a line beginning on the Westerly line of said Government Lot at a point 412.00 feet Southerly of the Northwest comer thereof; THENCE East to the Easterly line of said Government Lot; EXCEPT the Westerly 264.00 feet thereof, AND EXCEPT that portion thereof described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 19; THENCE South 89°27'31" East along the North line thereof, a distance of 264.01 feet to the point of beginning; THENCE continuing South 89°27'31" East, a distance of298.22 feet; THENCE South 21°47'27" West, a distance of 122.98 feet; THENCE South 70008'00" West, a distance of 83.38 feet; THENCE South 53°44'33" West, a distance of 164.46 feet; THENCE North 36*15'27" West, a distance of 44.74 feet to the beginning of a 340.00 foot radius curve the center of which bears South 53°44'33" West; THENCE Northwesterly along said curve trough a central angle of 05°00'38", an arc distance of 29.73 feet; THENCE North 01°06'36" East parallel with the West line of the Southwest quarter of said Northwest quarter, a distance of 183.39 feet to the point of beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. Tax Parcel No. 192104-9030-05 PARCEL 2-A-- An easement for ingress and egress over the South 30 feet of the West 264 feet of the North 412 feet of Govemment Lot 2, section 19, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., records of King County, Washington Situate in the County of King, State of Washington 0 Fidelity National Title Company of Washington Underwritten by Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 3500 188th Street SW #300 Lynnwood, Washington 98037 (425) 772-3031 / 527-1432 Fax No. (425) 224-0837 Direct Line (425) 640-3508 / 64013505 Toll Free: 1-800-776-3021 TO: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE - 2727 HOLLYCROFT STREET, #460 GIG HARBOR, WA 98335-0000 Attention KANDI WARNER Your Number -- Reference Name: GARDNER Order No. : 0272261 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to serve you. We appreciate your business and will strive to merit the confidence you have shown in us. Enclosed: SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE DOCUMENT COPIES Please call us whenever we can be of further assistance. DATED: MAY 31 2005 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON Fidelity National Titre Cofnpany of Washington .:, Underwritten by Fidelity National Title Tnsuxance Company 3500 168th Street SW #300 Lynnwood, Washington 98037 (425) 771-3031 / 527-1432 Fax No. (425) 224-0837 Direct Line (425) 640-3508 / 640/3505 Toll Free: 1-800-776-3021 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE TO: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE - 2727 HOLLYCROFT STREET, #460 GIG HARBOR, WA 98335-0000 Attention KANDI WARNER Your Number -- Reference Name: GARDNER OUR NUMBER 0172261 - Short Plat Certificate Premium $ 250.00 Sales Tax: $ 22-25 Dear Sirs: In the matter of the above described Short Plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of icing County, Washington, and from such examination hereby certifies that: TITLE TO the following described land is vested in: DONALD L. GARDNER, INC., a Washington corporation THE LAND is situate in said King County, and is described as follows: (See Attached - Page Two) Fidelity National Title Company of Washington Short Plat Certificate, Page 2 Our Number 0172261 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL 1: That portion of Government Lot 1, Section 19, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., records of King County, Washington, said portion being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 19; THENCE along the North line thereof South 89000118" East 335,78 feet; THENCE South 01035'16" West 42.00 feet to the Southerly margin of the lands described in deed recorded under Recording No. 8501170665, records of King County, Washington; THENCE along said Southerly margin South 89000118" East 18.07 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 658.00 feet; THENCE Easterly and Southeasterly 700.54 feet along said curve through a central angle of 60059'59"; THENCE South 28000119" East 422,43 feet to the true point of beginning and the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeast having a radius of 842.00 feet, THENCE Southeasterly 217,49 feet along said curve through a central angle of 14047159" to a radial line of said curve which bears South 47011142" West; THENCE leaving said margin along the non -tangent East line of said Government Lot South 01013'12" West 390.17 feet to the Southeast corner thereof; THENCE along the South line of said Government Lot North 88159120" West 561.92 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave to the Southeast having a radius of 897.03 feet (a radial line through said beginning bears North 74048134" West); THENCE Northerly and Northeasterly 732.77 feet along said curve through a central angle of 46046115" to the true point of beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. Fidelity National Title Company of Washington Short Plat Certificate, Page 3 Our Number 0172261 SCHEDULE A (continued); LEGAL DESCRIPTION (continued): PARCEL 2: That portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 19, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., lying Northerly of a line beginning on the Westerly line ' f d G ernment Lot at a point 412.00 feet Southerly of the Northwest o say ov corner thereof; THENCE East to the Easterly line of said Government Lot; EXCEPT the Westerly 264.00 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT that portion thereof described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 19; THENCE South 89027131" East along the North line thereof, a distance of 264.01 feet to the point of beginning; THENCE continuing South 8902713111 East, a distance of 298.22 feet; THENCE South 21047127" West, a distance of 122.98 feet; THENCE South 70008100" West, a distance of 83.38 feet: THENCE South 53044133" West. a distance of 164.46 feet; THENCE North 36015'27" West, a distance of 44.74 feet to the beginning of a 340.00 foot radius curve the center of which bears South 53044133" West, THENCE Northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 05°0013811, an arc distance of 29.73 feet; THENCE North 01006136" East parallel with the West line of the Southwest quarter of said Northwest quarter, a distance of 183.39 feet to the point of beginning - Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. PARCEL 2A An easement for ingress and egress over the South 30 feet of the West 264 feet of the North 412 feet of Government Lot 2, Section 19, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M.. records of King County, Washington Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. Fidelity National Title Company of Washington Short Plat Certificate, Page 4 Our Number 0172261 SCHEDULE A (continued): LEGAL DESCRIPTION (continued): NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Parcel 1: Ptn of Govt. Lot 1, S19-T21N-R4E Parcel 2: Ptn of Govt. Lot 2, S19-T21N-R4E SUBJECT TO the exceptions shown herein. No search has been made as to the taxes and assessments. THIS CERTIFICATE shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the Certificate applied for, Records examined to May 3, 2005 at 8:00 A.M. at 8:00 A.M. FIDELITY NATIO TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON By: �� ~ Christoff Huyboom, Title Officer Fidelity National Title Company of Washington Short Plat Certificate, Page 5 Our Number 0172261 EXCEPTIONS 1, GENERAL TAXES PAYABLE AFTER FEBRUARY 15TH: THE FIRST HALF TAXES ARE DUE PRIOR TO MAY 1ST; THE SECOND HALF TAXES ARE DUE PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 1ST= Year: 2005 Amount Billed: $4,645.46 Amount Paid: $2,322�73 Amount Due: $2,322.73 Tax Account No.: 192104-9044-09 Levy Code: 1205 Value of Land: $381,900.00 Affects: Parcel 1 To expedite payment of your taxes, you may mail the payment direct to: King County Treasurer 500 4th Ave, Room 600 Seattle, WA 98104 2. DELINQUENT TAXES: Year; Amount Billed: Amount Paid: Amount Due: Tax Account No.: Levy Code: Value of Land: Affects: 2005 $5,838.76 $ 0.00 $5,838.76, plus interest and penalties 192104-9030-05 1205 $480,000.00 Parcel 2 To expedite payment of your taxes, you may mail the payment direct to: King County Treasurer 500 4th Ave, Room 600 Seattle, WA 98104 3. NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL TAP OR CONNECTION CHARGES PURSUANT TO R.C.W. 65.08.170 BY WATER DISTRICT NO. 124, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF_ Recorded: June 1, 1981 Recording No.: 8106010916 Affects: Parcel 1 4. LATECOMER AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF; Recorded: October 21, 2004 Recording No.: 20041021000100 5. DEED OF TRUST AND ADDITIONAL ADVANCES, IF ANY, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantor: Donald L. Gardner, Inc., a Washington corporation Trustee• Pacific Northwest Title Company, a corporation Beneficiary. Michael R. Mastro, as his separate estate Original Amount: $2,200,000.00, plus interest Dated: March 8, 2005 Recorded: March 18, 2005 Recording No.: 20050318001666 Fidelity National Title Company of Washington Short Plat Certificate, Page 6 Our Number 0172261 6, Evidence of the identity and authority of the officers of Donald L. Gardner, Inc., a Washington corporation, to execute the forthcoming instrument should be submitted. 7, Any unrecorded leaseholds, right of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon said property, and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. 8. Right to enter said premises to make repairs and to cut brush and trees which constitute a menace or danger to the electric transmission line located in the street or road adjoining said premises, as granted by instrument Recording No.: 3534312 Affects: Parcel 2 9. Covenant to bear equal share of the cost of construction, maintenance or repair of easement for ingress and egress, easement for which was granted over other lands, by instrument Recording No.: 5270109 Affects: Parcel 2 10. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED/RESERVED/DISCLOSED/ CONTAINED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: April 2, 1986 Recording No.: 8604020489 In Favor Of: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Purpose: Underground electric system Affects: Portion of Parcel 1 11. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED/RESERVED/DISCLOSED/ CONTAINED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: November 17, 1987 Recording No.: 8711170788 In Favor Of• Federal Way Water and Sewer District Purpose: Sewer facilities Affects: Portion of Parcel 1 12. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED/RESERVED/DISCLOSED/ CONTAINED BY INSTRUMENT; Recorded: August 11, 1989 Recording No.: 8908110283 In Favor Of: King County Purpose: Slope, drainage and utility Affects: A 10 foot permanent easement for slopes, drainage and utilities over portion of Parcel 1 and other property 13. CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE ZONING OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE CAMPUS CREST PROPERTY (PARCEL 5), AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF -,- Recorded: March 5, 1990 Recording No.; 9003051119 Affects: Parcel 1 Fidelity National Title Company of Washington Short Plat Certificate, Page 7 Our Number 0172261 14� EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED/RESERVED/DISCLOSED/ CONTAINED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: August 7, 1990 Recording No.; 9008070651 In Favor Of: Washington Natural Gas Company Purpose: Gas pipeline or pipelines Affects: Said easement is 15 feet wide and is located Southerly of, parallel to and adjoining the South boundary line of Southwest Campus Drive. (Parcel 1 and other property) 15 EASEMENT AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Between: Federal Way Public School District And: David Hopkins Recorded: March 22, 1989 Recording No.: 8903220655 As Follows: Grant of easement and costs of improvement of Parcel 2A 16, EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED/RESERVED/DISCLOSED/ CONTAINED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: March 12, 2001 Recording No.; 20010312000348 In Favor Of: Geonerco, Inc., a Washington Corporation Purpose: Temporary sanitary sewer Affects: Portion of Parcel 2 17. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF. Recorded: February 4, 2002 Recording No.: 20020204000039 18_ CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF-,. Recorded: July 3, 2002 Recording No.: 20020703001710 19. EASEMENT FOR SEWER FACILITIES, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Recorded: October 14, 2003 Recording No.: 20031014000185 20, MEMORANDUM, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Recorded: October 14, 2004 Recording No.: 20041014002167 21_ Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as granted by Deed recorded under: Recording No.: 8501170665 Affects: Parcel 1 END OF EXCEPTIONS THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER IF WE MAY BE OF FURTHER ASSISTANCE, PLEASE GIVE US A CALL King, YVA , 4000-,dUU I -, Jfiee[: CM P r 0 a e a ..ar.. re w +eras s t N 1314 hf OI-AS-rGG 2r.9 �� fl Y I - •lr. b av y c Si r� Fye..a dai-l3-izE 4y ^l� W V rm m nay — v, + .0 44 w 4F a 1 i Alle �. 14 ... 4 r -0 • m ,4,� ..v'° "I" � •F *", ��' per �N i Harr+ � � r • �t � � � .�. NW 19„21-04 Fucor-r COUNTY ,RtmEaT of "SSF.SSMENTB �""" 20050318001664.001 AFTER REcORDINGMAII, TO: Corr, Cronin, michclwn, Baumganiaes &Pre= Attn: Joshua Prcoce 1001 Fourth Avenue, Suite 3900 Seattle wadliogtnn 99154-1051 Filed for Record at Request of Donald L. Gard = Inc 200503180016fi4 P AGE69S � 42 a3lsalx t4.e3 KING c0t1H7Y, uA1 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED GTE [ bf.J' dmh -( THE GRANTOR($) Bard and Kathy Plemmons (hugxmd and wife) brand in mumdcradvn of GDPI Ten Dollars ($10.00 ) and other good and vahwbls wnsi d=mian in hand paid, mmgs, and warranm to Dodd L. Gardner Inc., a Washington Corparatiaa, the following described real estate, situated in the cmq of King, state of WasinVOn: phbreyiated Portions of Caovc,,m Lot 1, Section 19, Tvuxtstup 21 N, Rang 4E, WM, King County, WA This deed is -recorded to correct the warranty provisions previously recorded under instrument #20050308001748 See F I.Wt "A' f- fun legal d-=Pfion• =—Zd ham. and -=P—ed heron b9'Of " ' Assmof, Property Tax ParmyA.cmant N mbw.. 192104-90" Dated: March 4, 2M 1 SrAn of V ASMNGWN > }s COUNTY OF R No fy*ar koow aet,. y—do- o'r�.ar � C 7 the ppxx�(s) 0. Wp=ta bcfar me, ffA and po--(x) —km—kW 421 0104W�)1°Pad ma try and ikioao "dpd ato be i6elhcch6cir) Sae and voMA-Y ad fartm we modpaxP—mmtinood m P6 im4rkmc�. 0.•-� . 4 �{�c e+� S NouryPabLeramdSr�csdaaa! J 3 c HoteSY x � ►"�' appnei+ CT1h-- O l-rS OL9 " pudu� r � f z ►i $ 11116 ',R���� H illNN FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE company of Wa4iagtou E2108963 eaisarneee ta:se KING TAX 09 SALE 0.00 Pmseal OF 001 20050318001664.002 EKWIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY WYNSTONE — Federal Way, WA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCELI: That portion of G ovemmmt Lot 1, Section 19, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., records of King county, Washington, said portion being more particularly dmmbed as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 19, THENCE along the North line thereof South 89'00' 18" East 335.78 fet THENCE South 01035' 16" West 42.00 feet to the Southerly margin of the lands described in deed recorded under Recording No. 8501170665, records of King Comity, Washington; THENCE along said Southerly margin South 89'00'18" East 18.07 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to (he Southwest having a radius of 658.00 feet; THENCE Easterly and Southeasterly 700.54 feet along said curve through a central angle of 60'59'59"; THENCE South 28'00' 19" East 422.43 feet to the true point of beginning and the beginning of a curve concave to to Nothew having a radius of 842.00 feet; THENCE Southeasterly 217.49 feet along said curve through a central angle of 14'4T 59" to a radial line of said curve which bears South 47'11'42" West; THENCE leaving said margin along the non -tangent East line of said Government Lot South 01'13'12" West 390.17 feet to the Southeast comer thereof THENCE'along the South line of said Government Lot North 8n9'2tl" West 561.92 feet to the beginning of a non-tangen t curve concave to. the Southeast having a radius of 897.03 feet (a radial line through said beginning bears North 74'4814" West); THENCE Northerly and Northeasterly 732.77 feet along said curve through a central angle of 46'48' 15" to the true point of beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Wasluagion Tax Parcel No.192104-9044-09 20050308001748.001 11I0051Q� I08001748�Qi oKceea ncn x1.em III 0S1la/2005 15!23 KING GOt1NTY, ua E2106527 WHEN pEcORDED, MAILT0: D000ld L Ordoa 1= ASI EAI2005 15: 23 xta+G wnes , ua cro o�G,� 6MF.dDFMNW SALE S2z 521.19 PAGE001 OF 001 ogEwrbor, WA. 98233 QUrF CLAIM DEED For ft purposes of this dociardrion and fur indexing by the auditor as required by RCW Ch. 65.04, the parties to this agmMH=t. are Brad I. Plermmnons a d Kathy L. PLeamimL husband and wife. (GRANTOR) and Donald L. Gardner. Inc. (GRANTEE). The GRANTOR, Brad J. N m a= and Kathy L. Pkwm ns, the Marital Community of them composcd, for and m valuable consideration does hereby convey and quit claim to Donald L. Gard=, lw,, a Washington Static cmporatioa (heel «naft0F the `Y'� ), the following described real estate smuts in the Couruy Of afe of washiagtm =hldiag any i d."t therein wbich GRANTOR may hueaficr acquire. DESCRIMdN: King County Tax Parcel # 192104-9044 Full Legal Desaiption Attacbcd as (Exhibit -,A.") Eu .►+l, reds cp l(�we{ 'C�c.�x� + t+.�4. IN NM ESS WBEREOF this 29th day of February_ 2005. , - El"V40 STATE OF WASHMGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF "E ) On this day personally appeared before me Brad Plemnwn to be known to be the individuals) described * and who executed the within and forgoing mstnisnent, and ackwwisclged that helshe signed his/her free a�y�act and deed for the cs and therein mentkx A GIVEN ands sD� seal th:,,�Vdayof 2005. $3 3$ =ru►1� a Notary Public in, pod for tare State of Wagon, Residing at rr1 •y!+h of V0,Z-S` my commission expires ow 20050308001748.002 STATE OF WASHNGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF PMB ) On this day msmwly app=rd before me Kad9 y L. P{cm _ to be (mown to be tine mdivuhW(s) dmaabed in, and who ex odW the within and farga in5tiromept, and acknowWgcd that hdshe signed bulbar flee and vohl my ad and dead for the uses and purposes therein mmdoned. GIVEN uni Seal 1hLS day of /'y/` 2005. AW— Notary P&W in%the State ofW//ashingto Residing at my C6mmiss, iou C)[piICS On: /% '% r 'a���. 20050308001748.003 ppigs 1'W' of Gov 1, Sew 19 Tcm nL x1 Na it te� T, M&m m IIpS Cam, Wa"t� per ben now &mtw d as folknn �g st tl s Noeawcd oamar of=d S� 79, T daog the N iosenaf ggq*0t]'1 M 335781ha dbed m deed f1►e�cc501°33"1 8 7� K=CmatY,Wa° oEat m urn 585°m' ism lg G7 fat to to ice at°ng crud SW� of 658 40 curve • omtcsl ta8ie ,� concave to 11ty Sautes �� .� S4 ,�#Od TheuCe ' y CA SavdseasY the of • p cf SU'S9 a3 fed ib thv T'nor Point of B�� m -aeact su`m t "E 47 of sa 00 � v tutus oa�c�►e to *e Na ft&t '1W ° raw t ce�ctd Uee of 14°4T'5r v a razhai Iwe of boo Fast T lwmg sad km of said Gave tot i�G � r o S01°13'12'V 31017 feat to tba � 3s TW= along & Soeth Lae of sm4 Gov't)a NOP wowat� of $97 03 o v �mg off a noo t�ged =m corms to ft S G (a radial hue t� and ��N74'48'34" W), >l o cao�sl 'f hwa NNttw andNflitlu Adly 732 77 fee[ 909 md of 46.48 13" To ft Tina Paw of B*n=9 Sinus m King cm", wwb Ottm EXHIBIT "A" f'f t 20050318001665.001 RETURN TO: DONALD L. GARDNER, INC. 20050318001665 6902 FORD DRIVE Nit CNICAGO TITL L!0 21.00 GIG HARBOR, WA 98332 PAG1E1891 DF d1d NINWc 01Urf 2605 S 1 Uri STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED 0 c Im5-193h -� Reference 0 (if app5caMe) Grantor(s): DAVID J. HOPKINS Addhioeal on Pages CAROL A. HOPKINS Caantee(s)s DONALD L. GARDNER, INC. Addhlonal on Pager Abbravlated Legal Desaipsion: PTN GOVT LOT 1, PTN GOUT LOT 2, Nit 1/4 Addldonal on Page SECTION 19-21-4 Assessors Tax ParcellDS 192104-9030-05 THE GRANTOR DAVID J. HOPKINS and CAROL A. HOPKINS, Husband and Wife for and Ea consi3cratfon of TEN DOLLARS & OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION AND AS PART OF AN IRC SECTION 1031 TAX-DEFER&SD EXCHANGE In hand paid, conveys and warrants to DONALD L. GARDNER, INC. , a Washington corporation the followinff described real estaM dtoated to the Conoty of RING State of WaddnMw SEE EXHIBIT "A° ATTACBRD HERETO AND A PART HEREOF. SUBJECT TOt RIGHT TO ENTER SAID PREMISES TO MAKE REPAIRS; CUT BRUSH AND TREES, AS GRANAT)M BY INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING NO. 3534312j COVENANT TO BEAR ALL OR PART OF COST OF CONSTRUCTION OR REPAIR OF EASHilBNT, RECORDING NO. 52701091 EASEMENT TO FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT, ]RECORDING NO. 89032206551 EASEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES, RECORDING NO. 20010312000348; EASENMgT FOR SLOPE AND GRADING, RECORDING NO. 2DO20703001710P SEWER EASEMENT, LAlCEiMVFN UTILITY, RECORDING NO. 20031014000185; LATECOMER AGRZYMM7 , RECORDING NO. 20041021000100 Dated: —y I S DAV71D J. OPKTNS CAROL A. HOPKINS E2108965 KV4 c sa ax TAX 15: 14. SALE 50's /. PAGE981 DF eel in 20050318001665.002 NOTARY PAGE STATE OF WASHINGTON } } ss. County of KING } 1 hereby certify that 1 know or have satbfactory evidence that DAVID J. HOPKINS, CAROL A. HOP&INS _ is the person(s) who appeared before nee, and saEd {s} atknowledged that ifre; sie_i ems} signed this hesumeru and acknowledged it co be { their f►ee and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mein oeed`W this lustrueaem. �___ ■ f�I 1 ................................................................................. STATE OF WASHMGTON } } ss. County of } 1 hereby certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person(.) who appeared before me, and said persoa(s) admowledged that (fey she, they) signed this htshwoens, on oath stated that authosfaed to exeaste the iostsnment and ac mawledge it as the Of to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned L this instrument. Dated - Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed Name Residing at my appofncmeut expires 200SO318001665.003 EXHIBIT uP THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING NORTHERLY OF A LINE BEGINNING ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT AT A POINT 412.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EAST TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT; EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 264.00 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE SOUTH 89°27'31" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 264.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; . THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89°YT31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 298.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21°4777" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 122.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 7n8'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 83.3E FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63°44'33" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 164A6 FEET; THENCE NORTH 36016'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 44.74 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 340.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 53°44'33" WEST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06°00'38", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 29.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01606'36" EAST PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 183.39 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH 30 FEET OF THE WEST 264 FEET OF THE NORTH 412 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN LING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #3400, SEATTLE, WA 98104 Order No.: 001162764 PROPERTY ADDRESS: VACANT LAND Your No.: GARDNER FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE 2727 HOLLYCROFT ST, SUITE 460 GIG HARBOR, WASHINGTON 98335 ATTN: KANDI 1/1 MAY 0 9 2005 Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. ««««««««««««««««««<»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» UNIT 10 - YOUR COMPLETE BUILDER/DEVELOPER SERVICE CENTER WE HAVE EXPANDED TO SERVE ALL YOUR TITLE INSURANCE NEEDS RELATED TO LAND ACQUISITION, DEVELOPMENT FINANCING AND PROPERTY SUBDIVISION. MIKE HARRIS TITLE OFFICER (206) 628-5623 (E-MAIL: MICHAEL.HARRIS@CTT.COM) KEITH EISENBREY TITLE OFFICER (206) 628-8377 (E-MAIL: KETTH.EISENBREY@CTT.COM) STEVE KINSELLA CONDO COORDINATOR (206) 628-5614 (E-MAIL: STEVE.KINSELLA@CTT.COM) BOB BLOEDEL SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER FAX NUMBER: (206) 628-5657 NEW ADDRESS ALERT: CHICAGO TITLE has moved its Seattle office from the 18th to the 34th floor of the Bank of America Tower. Effective January 20, 2004, our new address is: 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3400 Seattle, WA 98104 Our phone and fax numbers are still the same, but please note that our e-mail addresses have changed, as shown above. TITLETI5/RDA/0999 - x-HCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA___) 3400 COLUMBIA CMUER, 701 STB AVE SBATTLR, WA 98104 Order No.: 1162764 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Certificate for Filing Proposed Short Plat In the matter of the short plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said KING County, to -wit: SEE SCHEDULE A (NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: DONALD L. GARDNER, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $ 2 0 0, 0 0 TAX: $ 17,60 Records examined to May 3, 2 0 0 5 at 8: 00 A. M. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By HARR /EISENBREY Title Officer (206)628-5623 SHPIATA/12-5-90/EK )?iICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA` Order No.: 1162764 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION THOSE PORTIONS OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER ALL IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SAID PORTIONS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE ALONG THE EAST/WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 19 SOUTH 88°58'22" EAST 1,282.94 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF NORTH 01013'12" EAST 202.55 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION LINES BY DOCUMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 3194572, 3258849 AND 5029580, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER NORTH 1°13'12" EAST 1,502.83 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8501170665, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE Tb THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 842.00 FEET AND TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH 47°11'42" WEST; THENCE ALONG SAID MARGIN SOUTHEASTERLY AND EASTERLY 801.22 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54031'16" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 618.00 FEET (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 07019'34" WEST ); THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MARGIN EASTERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY 647.38 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 60001'11" TO SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION LINES BY DOCUMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 3194572, 3258849 AND 5029580, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE SOUTH 52058'44" WEST 1,662.66 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CHICAGO TTT'T.F, INSURANCF COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 1162764 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien, or right to lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding or in the same becoming a lien. 1. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights, claims, or title to water. K. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). SHPLATB/031694/soc CHTCACTO TM.F. TNSURANCF COMPANY -IICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA' -) Order No.: 1162764 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS a 1. RIGHT TO ENTER SAID PREMISES TO MAKE REPAIRS, AND THE RIGHT TO CUT BRUSH AND TREES WHICH CONSTITUTE A MENACE OR DANGER TO UTILITY LINES LOCATED ON PROPERTY ADJOINING SAID PREMISES, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3194572. a 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 210 PURPOSE: ACCESS AREA AFFECTED: EASTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY RECORDED: MARCH 26, 1986 RECORDING NUMBER: 8603260389 c SAID EASEMENT WAS AMENDED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9710211254. n 3. ONDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION PURPOSE: ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM TOGETHER WITH ALL NECESSARY OR CONVENIENT APPURTENANCES THEREOF AREA AFFECTED: PORTIONS OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY ADJOINING THE EXTERIOR MARGINS OF S.W. CAMPUS DRIVE RECORDED: APRIL 2, 1986 RECORDING NUMBER: 8604020489 CONTAINS COVENANT PROHIBITING STRUCTURES OVER SAID EASEMENT OR OTHER ACTIVITIES WHICH MIGHT ENDANGER THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. s 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: FEDERAL WAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PURPOSE: SEWER FACILITIES AND ALL APPURTENANCES RELATED THERETO AREA AFFECTED: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY RECORDED: NOVEMBER 17, 1987 RECORDING NUMBER: 8711170788 CHTCAGO TTTI F [NUJRANCF. COMPANY -)T.3ICAGO TITLE INsuRANCr-- COMPA'"—) Order No.: 1162764 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS F 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: KING COUNTY PURPOSE: SLOPES, DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES AREA AFFECTED: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 10 FEET IN WIDTH LYING PARALLEL TO AND ADJOINING SOUTHWEST CAMPUS DRIVE RECORDED: AUGUST 11, 1989 RECORDING NUMBER: 8908110283 c 6. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION PURPOSE: GAS PIPELINE(S) AND APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 15 FEET WIDE LOCATED SOUTHERLY OF, PARALLEL TO AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SOUTHWEST CAMPUS DRIVE RECORDED: AUGUST 7, 1990 RECORDING NUMBER: 9008070651 H 7. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION PURPOSE: UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINES AND ABOVE GROUND TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT AND CABINETS AND OTHER APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: NORTHERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: DECEMBER 8, 1992 RECORDING NUMBER: 9212081818 r 8. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PEI-YI CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION PURPOSE: SLOPES AND GRADING, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR GRADING, EXCAVATING AND STOCKPILING SHPIATB3 / 12-12-90 / EK CITIC'Af,O TM FTNQTTRAN('F (YIVIPA\-N' }'3ICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA' —) Order No.: 1162764 J R L M SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS MATERIAL AREA AFFECTED: THE WEST 20 FEET OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: APRIL 15, 2002 RECORDING NUMBER: 20020415000374 9. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND: THE QUADRANT CORPORATION RECORDED: MARCH 5, 1990 RECORDING NUMBER: 9003051118 REGARDING: RESTRICTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF SAID PREMISES 10. LATECOMER AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: HARBOUR HOMES INC. AND: LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT RECORDED: OCTOBER 21, 2004 RECORDING NUMBER: 20041021000100 REGARDING: DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION AND SANITARY SEWER MAINS CONSTRUCTED BY HARBOUR HOMES INC. AFFECTS: A WESTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES 11. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: KING COUNTY JANUARY 17, 1985 8501170665 AFFECTS: THAT PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY ABUTTING S.W. CAMPUS DRIVE x 12. FACILITY CHARGES, IF ANY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO HOOK-UP OR CONNECTION CHARGES AND LATECOMER CHARGES FOR WATER OR SEWER FACILITIES OF WATER DISTRICT NO. 124, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8106010916. SHPTATB3 / 12-12-90/EK f HTC'AnnrF T.F.TNCTTRANCF f'OMPAW 1HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA" —) Order No.: 1162764 L. p G SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS 13. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: 2005 192104-9008-03 1205 $ 2,341,700.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 28,484.65 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 28,484.65 AFFECTS: A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES. NOTE: IF THE TAX AMOUNT IS NOT EVENLY DIVISIBLE INTO TWO PAYMENTS, KING COUNTY WILL REQUIRE THE HALF PAYMENT BE ROUNDED UP TO THE NEXT CENT. FAILURE TO ROUND UP THE HALF PAYMENT MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE TAX PAYMENT BY THE COUNTY. 14. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: 2005 192104-9043-00 1205 $ 588,900.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 7,163.43 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 7,163.43 AFFECTS: A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES. NOTE: IF THE TAX AMOUNT IS NOT EVENLY DIVISIBLE INTO TWO PAYMENTS, KING COUNTY WILL REQUIRE THE HALF PAYMENT BE ROUNDED UP TO THE NEXT CENT. FAILURE TO ROUND UP THE HALF PAYMENT MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE TAX PAYMENT BY THE COUNTY. 15. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: DONALD L. GARDNER, INC., A WASHINGTON C'HTC'.AM_) TITT.F TN.4T TRA\CT C()MPA W SHPIATB3 / 12-12-90/EK —)-iICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA' -1 Order No.: 1162764 R s T SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS CORPORATION TRUSTEE: PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY BENEFICIARY: MICHAEL R. MASTRO, AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE AMOUNT: $ 6,241,950.00 DATED: FEBRUARY 9, 2005 RECORDED: APRIL 27, 2005 RECORDING NUMBER: 20050427001476 LOAN NUMBER: THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. SAID DEED OF TRUST IS A RE-RECORDING OF DEED OF TRUST RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20050210000210. ASSIGNMENT OF SAID DEED OF TRUST: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: ASSIGNEE: APRIL 25, 2005 APRIL 28, 2005 20050428001846 BANNER BANK 16. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: MICHAEL B. KERSCHNER AND DONALD L. GARDNER DBA ASPEN PROPERTIES, LLC AND ASPEN INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT TRUSTEE: PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BENEFICIARY: CAMPUS CREST, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AMOUNT: $ 850,000.00 DATED: APRIL 22, 2005 RECORDED: APRIL 22, 2005 RECORDING NUMBER: 20050422001701 LOAN NUMBER: THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. 17. RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF MICHAEL B. KERSCHNER AND DONALD L. GARDNER CHICAGO TM.R INSURANCE COMPANY SHPLATB3/ 12-12-90/EK �)nICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA- 1 Order No.: 1162764 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS DBA ASPEN PROPERTIES LLC AND ASPEN INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT, PRESUMED FROM PARAGRAPH(S) 16, TO HAVE AN INTEREST IN SAID PROPERTY. v NOTE: SAID INTEREST, IF ANY, IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING MATTER(S) SHOWN AT PARAGRAPH(S) 18 AND 19. w 18. JUDGMENT: AGAINST: x Y z FOrd IN FAVOR OF: FOR: ENTERED: JUDGMENT NUMBER: SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER ATTORNEY FOR CREDITOR: LAFOUNTAINE CONSTRUCTION CORP. AND MICHAEL KERSCHNER AND CYNTHIA KERSCHNER, AND THEIR MARITAL COMMUNITY JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY MUTUAL MATERIALS COMPANY $ 57,620.80 FEBRUARY 28, 1997 97-9-05508-9 97-2-13490-2 LEONARD D. FLANAGAN NOTE: THE LIEN OF SAID JUDGMENT DEPENDS UPON THE IDENTITY OF THE JUDGMENT DEBTOR WITH MICHAEL B. KERSCHNER. SAID JUDGMENT ALSO APPEARS OF RECORD UNDER INSTRUMENT(S) RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER(S) 9702281679. 19. JUDGMENT: AGAINST: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: ENTERED: JUDGMENT NUMBER: SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER: ATTORNEY FOR CREDITOR: DONALD AND SUSAN GARDNER NHAN BUSSELLE $ 9,787.19 MARCH 10, 1998 98-9-31050-8 98-2-05009-8 DOUGLAS WALTER SCOTT NOTE: THE LIEN OF SAID JUDGMENT DEPENDS UPON THE IDENTITY OF THE JUDGMENT DEBTOR WITH DONALD L. GARDNER. AB 20. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. AC NOTE 1: C'HTC'AGC) TTTT F.TNCTTRANC'F CYIMPANY SHPLATB3/ 12-12-90/EK "-�t?ICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CONTA"') Order No.: 1162764 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 64.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PORTIONS EH NWQ SECTION 19-21-4. AS OF MAY 3, 2005, THE TAX ACCOUNTS FOR SAID PREMISES ARE 192104-9008-03 AND 192104-9043-00. rm END OF SCHEDULE B C14TCACT0TTTT.RTNSTJRA\C'F C(-)MPANY SHPIATB3 / 12-12-90/EK CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #1800, SEATTLE, WA 98104 PHONE: (206)628-5600 FAX: (206)623-7463 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. F CITY of MEMORANDUM ,�, . Federal Way Community Development Services. Department NOTICE OF DECISION ON WYNSTONE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FILE January 21, 2005 Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 20-128, this notice is to inform you that the Federal Way City Council, on January 18, 2005, approved by resolution the Lakota Crest preliminary plat application, File No. 03-102630- 00-SU. The resolution implementing the Wynstone Concomitant Agreement becomes effective upon completed execution of the Agreement under City File No. 03-102632-00-UP. An Environmental Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance was issued for the above proposal on September 1, 2004. Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-128(c)(2) (enclosed), affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes, notwithstanding any program of revaluation. The City Council's decision is the City's final decision on the preliminary plat application. Per FWCC Section 20-129, prior to construction of improvements pursuant to preliminary plat approval, engineering drawings for public improvements shall be submitted for review and approval to the Department of Public Works and the Lakehaven Utility District. The applicant may not engage in any activity based on the decision, including construction or site work, until final approval of all engineering and utility plans (including storm drainage), the payment of all pertinent fees, the submittal of performance and maintenance securities as may be required, and a pre -construction meeting has been held. Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-129(c), approval of the preliminary plat by the City Council constitutes acceptance of subdivision layout and design, and includes all conditions, restrictions, and other requirements adopted by the Council as part of plat approval. City Council approval of a preliminary plat does not constitute approval for land clearing or grading, vegetation removal, or any other activities which otherwise require permits from the City. As noted, be advised that the resolution implementing the Agreement and allowing the plat to proceed does not become effective until the Agreement is fully executed. Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-130, the action of the City in granting or denying an application under this article may be reviewed pursuant to 36.70C in the King County Superior Court. The land use petition must be filed within 21 calendar days of issuance of the City's final decision on the preliminary plat application. Standing to bring the action is limited to the following.parties: the applicant or owner of the property on which the subdivision is proposed; any property owner within 300 feet of the proposal; and any property owner who deems himself aggrieved thereby and who will suffer direct and substantial impacts from the proposed subdivision. Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-131, preliminary plat approval shall expire five years from the date of City Council approval unless substantial progress has been made toward completion of the entire plat, or the initial phase of the plat, if the preliminary approval included phasing. The five-year preliminary plat approval period started on January 18, 2005. In the event the applicant has not made substantial progress toward completion of the plat, the applicant may request an extension from the Hearing Examiner. The request for extension must be submitted to the Department of Community Development Services at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the preliminary plat. In considering whether to grant the extension, the Hearing Examiner shall consider whether conditions in the vicinity of the subdivision have changed to a sufficient degree since initial approval to warrant reconsideration of the preliminary plat. If the Hearing Examiner deems such reconsideration is warranted, a public hearing shall be scheduled and advertised in accordance with FWCC Section 20-119. If you have any questions regarding this notice of final decision, please contact Senior Planner Jim Harris, City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services, at 253-835-2641 or iim harris acityoffederalway.=. CITY OF ti. Federal Way January 6, 2005 Brad Plemmons 101 T Street SE Auburn, WA 98002 fFILE CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffe dera I wa y. com RE: Wynstone Preliminary Plat and Concomitant Agreement Status File No's 03-102630-00-SU and 03-102632-00-UP; WYNSTONE Dear Mr. Plemmons: Enclosed is a copy of the City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) agenda and staff cover memo to the LUTC for the Wynstone Preliminary Plat and Concomitant Agreement. The LUTC is scheduled to review the proposal on Monday, January 10, 2005, at their 6:30 P.M. meeting. Although not required, we encourage you to attend the meeting to respond to any questions the committee may have. The LUTC will forward a recommendation to the full City Council. Please note that a couple of non -substantive grammatical changes have been made to the Concomitant Agreement. The name of the party entering into the agreement has also been revised and the term "owner" was eliminated. Finally, one substantive change has been made to Section 6.2 of the agreement regarding right-of-way improvements. Specifically, in Section 6.2 the term "preliminary plat" was changed to "final plat," in regard to timing of completion of improvements. Please provide a legal description for parcel 5b on 8.5" x 11" paper to attach as Exhibit A to the Concomitant Agreement. Provide the correct name of the individual or corporation that will be signing the Concomitant Agreement, so we can update the agreement with the correct name and/or corporation. As we have previously discussed, the person signing the agreement must be entitled to sign the agreement as the property owner, and provide documentation of signature authority for any individual signing on behalf of a group or business venture. At the time of the owner signing the agreement, current proof of ownership must be provided to the City with a title report addendum dated the same date the owner signs the Concomitant Agreement. The Concomitant Agreement does not necessarily need to be signed immediately following City Council approval of the resolution. However, City staff would encourage you to wrap up this aspect of the proposal shortly after the City Council final approval. The signed agreement will run with the property and transfer in its entirety with any ownership changes. The City will consider the date the City Council approves the preliminary plat and Concomitant Agreement resolution as the effective date of the approval, starting the five-year preliminary plat approval duration identified in Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 20-131. Mr. Plemmons January 6, 2005 Page 2 The applicant will be responsible for the recording fee for the Concomitant Agreement. If you have any questions or need any assistance, contact me at 253-835-2641 or jim.barris@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, L4iin Harris Senior Planner enc: LUTC Staff Memo for Wynstone c: Ken Miller, Public Works Deputy Director Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer AmyJo Pearsall, City Staff Attorney 03-102630 Doc. I.D. 30041 \". N 5TUj l6 SLj 1eqa� Sv.1 b til f�izs Ef-�1c�J 03-Ia7-63o-SSA QT 70 scrAL.e N G c r �A101M!A0 A�AI�I�rIr1A� MAVY1004A Bergq�ist Engineering Services 27207 8th Avenue S Des Moines, Washington 98198 PO. Box 13309 Des Moines, Washington 98198 Phone: 253.941.9399, Fax: 253,941 .9499, e-mail: RBergqu510@aol.com April 15, 2004 Mr. Brad Plemmons 101 T Street SE Auburn, Washington 98002 Re: Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Evaluation Proposed Wynstone Subdivision 13.49-Acre Site South of the Intersection of 10' Ave. SW and SW Campus Dr. Federal Way, Washington King County Parcel numbers: 1921049044 & 1921049030 BES Project Number: 200323, Report 2 Dear Brad: This letter is in response to the city of Federal Way letter dated March 17, 2004. More specifically, it addresses Items 12a through 12e. 12a) Most of the 40 percent slope adjacent to Campus Drive will be flattened to about 16 percent to construct the entrance road to the subdivision. The remainder of the 40 percent slope in Tract C will be left as is and, according to Jim Jaeger, there is no construction planned in Tract C. There will be pedestrian access provided through Tract A after it is flattened to about 16 percent (6.25H:1 V). A drainage pond will also be constructed in the southeast corner of Tract A, but it will be at least 25 feet from the crest of any steep slopes along SW Campus Drive. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION Mr. Brad Plemmons BES Project Number 200323, Report 2 12b) The 10-foot wide buffer applies only to residential structures from the crest of cut slopes. See attached drawing. 12c) The 10-foot wide buffer applies only to residential structures from the crest of fill slopes. See attached drawing. 12d) The 10-foot wide buffer applies only to residential structures from the crest of fill and cut slopes greater than eight feet in height. 12e) The recommended 10-foot wide buffer applies only to placement of residential structures from the crest or toe of slopes greater than 10 feet in height. Buffers between the crest and toe of shorter slopes shall be equal to the height of the slope. For example, the buffer from the crest of a five-foot tall slope shall be five feet. The buffers do not apply to removal of vegetation, construction of pavement, or utilities. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we may be of further service, please contact us. Sincerely, Bergquist Engineering Services Richard A. Bergquist, P.E. Principal Attached: Site Plan Showing Buffers for Residential Structures Copies to: Mr. Brad Plemmons (3) Jim Jaeger (2) Bergquist Engineering Services Page 2 of 2 ri 4b Al EXPIRES � �K Al Collision Record System Collision Diagram City of Federal Way 07-05-2006 Location: SW CAMPUS DR, 3 ft. W of 10 AV SW Report Period: 1 /1 /2003 to 12/31 /2005 I North SW CAMPUS DR 2 2 1 1 [+ OW21911l�a LEGEND: Right Angle: Head On: xx Backing: Sideswipe: o Approach Turn: Pedestrian/ Bicyclist: Rear End: r- Fixed Object/ Parked Vehicle: Note: HOLLOW CIRCLE: Property Damage Only SOLID CIRCLE: At least one injury collision SOLID SQUARE: At least one fatality collision. P/B City of Federal Way Collision Diagram Report 7/5/2006 Report Period: l/l/2003 to 12/31/2005 Location: 10 AV SW at SW CAMPUS DR North Leg North Leg - Right Angle with Westbound Vehicle (3.03%) Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Vehl Veh2 Fatj PDO Run Veh Mon-5/23/2005 03:30 PM 057370 _ N->E E->S 0 0 P H 1 2 Totals 0 0 1 1 2 North Leg - Rear End (6.06%) Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Vehl Veh2 Fat In' PDO Run Veh Tue-12/14/2004 12:30 PM 0417304 N->S N->S 0 0 P 2 Fri-10/28/2005 11:54 PM 0516170 N->S N->S 0 2 3 Totals 0 2 1 0 5 North Leg - Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle (3.03%) Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tdi Date Collision Number Vehl Veh2 Fat N PDO - Run V Mon-9/5/2005 06:25 PM 0513222 N->W 0 0 P Totals 0 0 1 0 1 North Leg - Approach Turn, Turning Vehicle at Fault (6.06%) Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Vehl Veh2 Fat In PDO Run Veh Mon-3/17/2003 04:05 PM 033838 N->E S->N 0 1 1 Sun-10/9/2005 08:00 PM 05015065 N->E S->N 0 0 P 2 Totals 0 1 1 0 3 East Leg East Leg - Right Angle with Southbound Vehicle (3.03% Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & T]eh Date Collision Number Vehl Veh2 Fat Inj__PDO Run V Mon-8/16/2004 01:41 PM 0411491 E->W N->E 0 2 Totals 0 2 0 0 2 East Leg - Rear End with Westbound Right Turn (3.03%) Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Vehl Veh2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Mon-2/1412005 02:58 PM 052287 E->W E->N 0 1 2 Totals 0 1 0 0 2 East Leg - Rear End (18.18%) Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num ' Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Vehl Veh2 Fat Inj PDO_ Run Veh Thu-5129/2003 05:54 PM 037536 E->W _ E->W 0 1 2 Fri-7/11/2003 05:01 PM 039841 E->W E->W 0 0 P 2 Mon-1/24/2005 05:33 PM 0501210 E->W E->W 0 0 P 2 Mon-4/11/2005 10:55 AM 055110 E->W E->W 0 0 P 2 Fri-5/27/2005 12:10 PM 0507560 E->W E->W 0 0 P 2 Mon-8/1/2005 04:51 PM 0511213 E->W E->W 0 0 P 2 Totals West Leg West Leg - Right Angle with Eastbound Vehicle (3.03%) Collision Time Of Case Direction Date Collision Number Vehl Veh2 Sat-12/4/2004 04:56 PM 0416857 W->E N->E Totals West Leg - Sideswipe (3.03%) Collision Time Of Case Direction Date Collision Number Vehl Veh2 Thu-6116/2005 08:49 PM 058574 W->N W->N Totals West Leg - Rear End (21.21 %) 0 1 5 0 12 Num Num Hit & Tot Fat In PDO Run Veh 0 0 P 2 0 0 1 0 2 Num Num Hit & Tot Fat N PDO Run Veh 0 2 3 0 2 0 0 3 Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Vehl Veh2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh _ _ Mon-1/6/2003 03:39 PM _ 030297 W->E B 0 0 P 2 Wed-9/17/2003 09:57 AM 0313104 W->N W->N 0 0 P 2 Thu-9/18/2003 08:52 AM 0313148 W->E W->E 0 0 P 2 Wed-3/24/2004 05:44 PM 04004217 W->E W->E 0 0 P 2 Thu-5/27/2004 11:32 AM 047435 W->E W->E 0 0 P 2 Fri-10/14/2005 02:15 PM 05015329 W->E W->E 0 0 P 3 Thu-12/15/2005 10:53 AM 0518599 W->E W->E 0 0 P 2 Totals 0 0 7 0 15 West Leg - Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle (3.03%) Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Vehl Veh2 Fat �n PDO Run Veh Fri-11121/2003 02:20 AM 0316439 W->N 0 0 P 1 Totals U 0 1 0 1 West Leg - Approach Turn, Turning Vehicle at Fault (21.21%) Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Vehl Veh2 Fat inj PDO Run Veh _ Sat-4112/2003 05:24 PM 03005137 W->N -E->W 0 1 2 Tue-6/10/2003 01:35 PM 038147 W->N E->W 0 2 2 Mon-10/6/2003 05:50 PM 03014140 W->N E->W 0 2 3 Sat-3/27/2004 09:40 PM 044387 W->N E->W 0 o P 2 Sat-5/22/2004 02:19 PM 047176 W->N E->W 0 o P 2 Thu-1/6/2005 07:07 PM 05292 W->N E->W 0 0 P 2 Mon-11/28/2005 04:05 PM 0517747 W->N E->W 0 1 2 Totals 0 6 3 0 15 West Leg - Approach Turn, Thru Vehicle at Fault (3.03%) Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Vehl Veh2 Fat in' PDO Run Veh _ Mon 10/31/2005 07:21 PM 0516295 E->W W->N 0 o P 2 Totals 0 0 1 0 2 Other (3.03 %) Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Vehl Veh2 Fat in' PDO Run Veh Sat-1 1127/2004 01:40 PM 0416496 E->W E->S 0 1 2 Number of Collisions: Number of Vehicles Involved: Number of Fatalities: Number of Injuries: Number of PDOs: Collision Rate: 33 67 0 (0.00%) 11/16 (33.33 %) 22 (66.67%) Totals 0 1 0 0 2 City of Federal Way i. Corridor Report 7/5/2006 Report Period: 01/01/2003 to 12/31/2005 Corridor: SW CAMPUS DR between 10 AV SW and 7 WY SW 0 10 AV SW at SW CAMPUS DR Year:(,Date 20d3 Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Tyre of Collisil Mon-1/6/2003 03:39 PM 030297 Rear End Mon-3/17/2003 04:05 PM 033838 Approach Turn Sat-4/12/2003 05:24 PM 03005137 Approach Turn Thu-5/29/2003 05:54 PM 037536 Rear End Tue-6/10/2003 01:35 PM 038147 Approach Turn Fri-7/11/2003 05:01 PM 039841 Rear End Wed-9/17/2003 09:57 AM 0313104 Rear End Thu-9/18/2003 08:52 AM 0313148 Rear End Mon-10/6/2003 05:50 PM 03014140 Approach Turn Fri-11/21/2003 02:20 AM 0316439 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio 10 Year: .2064 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat In PDO Run Veh W->E B P 2 N->E S->N 1 1 W ->N E->W A -- 1 2 E->W E->W 1 2 W->N E->W 2 2 E->W E->W P 2 W->N W->N P 2 W->E W->E P 2 W->N E->W 2 3 W->N P 1 Totals: 0 7 5 0 19 Direction Veh 1 Veh 2 Wed-3/24/2004 05:44 PM 04004217 Rear End W->E W->E Sat-3/27/2004 09:40 PM 044387 Approach Turn W->N E->W Sat-5/22/2004 02:19 PM 047176 Approach Turn W->N E->W Thu-5/27/2004 11:32 AM 047435 Rear End W->E W->E Mon-8/16/2004 01:41 PM 0411491 Right Angle E->W N->E Sat-11/27/2004 01:40 PM 0416496 Right Angle E->W E->S Sat-12/4/2004 04:56 PM 0416857 Right Angle W->E N->E Tue-12/14/2004 12:30 PM 0417304 Rear End N->S N->S Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year:" 2 Date Time Of Collision Collision Thu-1/6/2005 07:07 PM Mon-1/24/2005 05:33 PM Mon-2/14/2005 02:58 PM Mon-4/11/2005 10:55 AM Mon-5/23/2005 03:30 PM Fri-5/27/2005 12:10 PM Thu-6/16/2005 08:49 PM Mon-8/1/2005 04:51 PM Mon-9/5/2005 06:25 PM 8 Totals Num Num Hit & Tot Fat Run Veh P 2 P 2 P 2 P 2 2 2 1 2 P 2 P 2 �0 3 6 0 16 Case Number T of Collision Direction Veh 1 Veh 2 Num Num Fat N PDO Hit & Tot Run Veh 05292 Approach Turn W->N E->W P 2 0501210 Rear End E->W E->W P 2 052287 Rear End E->W E->N 1 2 055110 Rear End E->W E->W P 2 057370 Right Angle N->E E->S P H 2 0507560 Rear End E->W E->W P 2 058574 Sideswipe W->N W->N 2 3 0511213 Rear End E->W E->W P 2 0513222 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle N->W P 1 Page 1 Sun40/9/2005 08:00 PM 05015P—) Approach Turn N->E P 2 - Fri-10/14/2005 02:15 PM 05015-_, Rear End W->E v, ->E P 3 Fri-10/28/2005 11:54 PM 0516170 Rear End N->S N->S 2 3 Mon-10/31/2005 07:21 PM 0516295 Approach Turn E->W W->N P 2 Mon-11/28/2005 04:05 PM 0517747 Approach Turn W->N E->W 1 2 Thu-12/15/2005 10:53 AM 0518599 Rear End W->E W->E_ _ _ P 2 _Totals: Number of Collisio Yearly 15 _ Totals: 0 6 11 1 32 Link Totals: Number of Collision 33 Totals: 0 16 22 1 67 10 AV SW 300 ft. E of SW CAMPUS DR Year: 2004 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Number T e of Collis' Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Iti PDO Run Veh Mon-1/26/2004 12:12 PM 041269 Rear End W->E W->E 1 Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio 1 Totals: 0 1 0 0 Link Totals: Number of Collision 1 Totals: 0 1 0 0 SW CAMPUS DR 319 ft. E of 10 AV r Year: 2005 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Tnj PDO Run Veh Sat-8/27/2005 12:38 PM 0512709 Backing Bck 1 Mon-11/7/2005 06:56 AM 0516662 jq t Angle N->E E->W P — Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio 2 T Totals: 0 1 1 0 Link Totals: Number of Collision 2 Totals: 0 1 1 0 7 WY SW at SW CAMPUS DR Year: 2003 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat In' PDO Run_ Veh I Mon-4/7/2003 02:55 PM 034898 Fixed Object/Parked V cle E->W 1 1 ' Wed-5/14/2003 04:17 PM 036754 Right Angle N->E E->W P 2 Fri-10/3/2003 04:37 PM 03013981 Rear End E->W E->N 1 2 Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2004 Date Time Of Collision Collision 7 Fri-9/10/2004 11:34 P1V 3 Case t✓ Number_' a of Collision 04126.61 Rear End Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2005 Date Time . Case Collision COW n Number Type of Collision _ Mon-1/17/2005 05:18 PM 050853 Rear End Yearly Totals: Number &(Collisio 1 Link Totals: Number of Collision 5 Totals: 0 2 1 u 3 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat In' PDO Run Veh E->W E->N P H 2 Totals: 0 0 1 1 2 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat In PDO Run—Veh E->W _ E->W P _ 21 Totals: 0 0 1 0 2 Totals: 0 2 3 1 9 Page 2 32 SW 330 St m v� cn n ` a Z "-69 984 F191 191 �74-J�T� r 646—i 61, 'tr Ln 00 ro m SW K:\TRAFFIC\data\2006\2006 PM.sy7 24-* 234--a- I I O SW.334 %St a 34-y N r r� i ; tL SW 344 St .?T a� rr, 2006 PM i ���Vyr7 C� -i� co 2 840-> �r662 L FAX/MEMORANDUM To: Rick Perez, P.E. City Traffic Engineer From: Chris Brown Date: Re: March 31, 2004 Y 7 Wynstone nee Rachael Ridge Revised Traffic Impact Analyses — Comments Number of pages 26 Per our meeting of March 23rd with Brad Plemmons and Mr. Ken Miller and also referencing your memorandum of March 11"' I am attaching "revised" pages covering the various items we discussed. If you wish, these can be copied and inserted into the TIA as "replacement pages" or, in the alternative, after your review, I can run a new set or sets of the entire TIA as a full replacement(s). The revisions are as follows. They are also "highlighted" by a blue vertical line in the right margin so that you can readily see what they are. Page 4 Paragraph 3 Page 8 Paragraph 5 Page 14 Figure 6 Page 15 Figure 7 Page 16 Paragraph 1 Page 16 Table IV Page 17 Notes B & C Page 17 Note 2. Page 18 Paragraph 1 Page 20 Paragraph 5 Page 22 Last 2 bullets Appendix Table of Cont. LOS Analyses Notes access the I Avenue SW. Changes speed limit Adds traffic for 12n' Avenue SW connection Adds traffic for 12th Avenue SW connection Revised to discuss 121h Avenue SW connection Revises LOS at lines 3, 6 and adds new line 12 Revises Note B and adds new Note C Revised to alternative route via 12a' Ave. SW. Deleted from text Revised to show code required frontage improvements Revised to discuss poor LOS at 13n' Way/356'h and adds a final TIA brief summary. Adds a new LOS set at the foot of the page for the 12�h Avenue corridor, e.g. the LOS at 13t' Way/356'h Revises pages 5 and 6, 11 and 12, 27 and 28, 33 and 34, 49 and 50, 55 and 56, and adds new pages 67, 68, and 69, Last, as discussed on March 23rd, my software does not allow discrimination between protected -permissive versus pure protected so I was not able to alter the LOS per your comments Numbered 14, 15, and 16. I think this will complete the revisions to your satisfaction. =Qainier n fn Associates JW: . S.8-5981 ax (206) 7TL'Z-1909 1& Avenue SW from SW Campus Drive and along a new linkage to the east, SW 339t' Place, where it connects to Saghalie Park and also continues to the southeast where a connection to 12t' Avenue SW is proposed in the near future. The site plan and this local access street network are shown on Figure 2. The southward extension of the le Avenue SW/12n' Avenue SW linkage will be constructed from the junction of le Avenue SW/SW Campus Drive and past the proposed SW 339n' Place. It should be noted that this new linkage to the south — 12n` Avenue SW — would provide a new access route to the adjacent plat of Orchid Lane. In addition, the linkage to the west via SW 339n` Place will also provide a new direct access to the city's park and to the adjacent Saghalie Junior High School. In this analysis it will be seen that the main access is via the signalized intersection of 10'b Avenue SW and SW Campus Drive with a secondary access to the south and southwest via 12n' Avenue SW through the recently completed street network of Orchid Lane, the adjacent single family residential plat located immediately south. Traffic using these access points is described later on Figure 6. Analysis Criteria The traffic analysis considers this single family detached residential housing development as conforming to the institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) rip Generation Manual 6n' edition, Land Use Code 210 and, for the adjacent multi -family development of Plemmon 's Plateau, under Land Use Code 220, apartments. The fundamental intersections within the city expected to be impacted by ten or more of the site's p.m, peak hour generated traffic are all located along the SW Campus Drive/S. 348t' Street Corridor from Enchanted Parkway/ 16`h Avenue S. and the SW 35e Street Corridor to Pacific Highway S. These intersections are shown on the following schematic traffic diagrams and described later in the table showing current and future levels of service. Ad'scent Land Uses The adjacent land uses, in addition to the previously described new residential plats of Orchid lane, Lake Haven Estates, and the Pena Subdivision are the city's Saghalie Park 52 Christopher Brown 0 Awodatea 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 As described earlier, since the p.m. peak hour contains both employment related trips as well as shopping and some social -recreation travel, it is the largest peak hour of the working day and, accordingly, is used as the "design hour" of the project. Current p.m. peak hour data is shown on Figure 3, Current Traffic Volumes. Bus and truck frequencies are noted in the Appendix as a part of the computer data along with road grades, number and width of traffic lanes, geometric data and traffic control devices. Figure 3 and subsequent traffic volume figures are schematic and do not show any scale other than that associated with the respective traffic volumes. Street System The primary link to the regional arterial and highway network is SW campus Drive and thence to S. 348n' Street. For the most part these are 5-lane arterial facilities with curbs, gutters and sidewalks. Signalization at the main intersections is based on pole -and -mast - arm styles with multi -phased signal controllers. The posted speed limit on this facility is 35 mph. Similarly, the newly built sections of the SW/S. 356n' Street Corridor have a 5-lane section and a posted speed limit of 40 mph. Between 1't Avenue S. and Pacific Highway South it is limited to 2-lanes at this writing. In this neighborhood 21t Avenue SW is likewise a 5-lane facility expect south of SW 348a' Street where it drops to a 4-lane section. For the most part, the north -south links Between the SW Campus Drive/S. 348th Street corridor and the S. 356n' Street corridor are 2-lane roadways with speed limits ranging from 25 to 35 mph. Since the major issues tend to be intersection capacity, the roadway intersection geometry is noted in the appendix for the several intersections analyzed in this TIA. The intersection data includes approach lanes, grades and signal phasing. Horizon Year Volumes Witbout Project Figure 4, 2006 Baseline Volumes is the horizon year forecast traffic volumes computed -8- =JJ9688 stopher Brown 0 Awodatea Rainier Ave. 8. tle, WA 98118-5981 ) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 jOy FIGURE 6 16" Avenue S. 9`h Avenue S. 1" Avenue S. b Is 00 fn 7 oeS tp Assignment, Wynstone & Plemmon's Plateau -14- Enchanted Parkway S. paej� l ` LEGEND �. Peak Volumes -h with 12th Ave ' 7 Avenue S W /r SITE 12th Ave. SW i n_k s Rachael Ridge Inbound 33 Y 3 Outbound 18 PlemmEn- Plateau ,} Inbound 8� Outbound 4. j 21" Avenue SW �( Chri"toph79811�87-5981 e" 1 9688 Qain J Seattle, W (206) T22-09 vti 160' Avenue S. Enchanted Parkway S- A'c��c vl gth Avenue S. Alp b 1 si Avenue S. -9 ye�Ue 7`h Avenue SW 8 SITE 12th Ave. SW S--2- 1� M Data at this inter. lg C 3 assumes site traffic C uses 12th Ave. SW link-3 e 21Avenue SW FIGURE 7 Chris]7U22-1910 er Brown CAS Aesociate8 2006 Horizon Year Forecast with Projects 9688 nier Ave. (S. (SeattWA 98118-5981 -15- (206) Fax (206) 722-1909 geometrically deficient or capacity inadequate linkages by the horizon year of 2006. In effect, it was an unrestrained assignment with only a moderate adjustment to conform to advice of the city's traffic analyst. Similarly, the 12th Avenue SW corridor is assumed unused by site traffic due to poor travel -times as described in later analyses. (However, as requested, in both Figures 6 and 7 an estimate of site traffic demands is made along the 12`h Avenue SW corridor with that data shown in "clouds". This supplemental analysis was performed for estimating purposes only and is not considered appropriate at this time due to poor levels of service at SW 356th Street and 13th Way SW, as noted below.) Capacity Analysis Capacity analysis was performed with the TEAPAC software published by Strong Concepts of Northbrook, Illinois, and used under license to Christopher Brown, P.E. The results of the analysis are noted in Table IV. When reviewing the following LOS summaries, note that the computer input and results are included in the Appendix. The appendix computations show the degree of saturation, average delays, maximum queue lengths and approach LOS values as well as the overall LOS values at signalized intersections. For simplicity, only the overall LOS and average per vehicle delay (in seconds) are used in the following table. TABLE IV Levels of Service & Average Delay Intersection Current 2006 2006 Year No Project W/Project LOS v/c Delay LOS v/c Delay LOS v/c Delay S. 348 /Enchanted Pkwy. D 0.81 49.0 E 0.85 57.8 E 0.86 58.5 S. 348a7Pacific Hwy. S. E 0.92 66.3 E 0.97 78.9 E ' 0.97 79.9 --1 S. 348a'/9' Ave. S. D 0.80 48.3 E 0.84 56.1 E 0.84 56.1 S. 348th/Ist Ave. S. E 0.91 73.1 E 0.93 79.2 D 0.81 54.6 a Campus Drive/6tr Ave. S. B 0.58 20.0 C 0.64 21.7 C 0.65 22.0 - ° Campus Drive/1 C h Ave. S. E 0.70 56.8 E 0.72 70.6 E 0.73 74.5 B S. 35e/Pacific Hwy. S. E 0.78 66.3 E 0.84 78.6 E .0.83 79.0 S. 356th/1st Ave. S. D 0.66 37.1 D 0.71 40.7 D 0.72 41.0 S. 356th/7th/8th Ave. S. C 0.52 21.7 C 0.56 22.2 C 0.56 22.3 SW 356n'/21St Ave. SW E 0.81 55.1 E 0.88 73.3 E 0.88 74.2 SW 336th/21st Ave. SW E 0.88 68.8 E 0.92 79.8 E 0.92 79.9 SW 356h/13th Wa SW F 0.60 99.0 F 0.80247.7 F 0,92255.6c Christopher Brown Cn CJ6 Associates 9688 rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 -16- (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 LOS Footnotes A. Revised signal phasing to use concurrent north -south timing (Phase 1) and split phase on the east -west movements to use a protected eastbound left turn phase followed by permissive phasing. B. Would be enhanced to LOS D with 54.6 seconds of delay if revised to use a leading protected phase for the westbound through plus left turns and lagging eastbound through plus left turns. C. This poor LOS is due to currently used STOP control. Signal warrants do not exist at this intersection and may not for some time to come. In addition to the footnotes in the table of the previous page, and described above, the following assumptions are also considered in the LOS analysis. Accordingly, the results of this table represent a worst -case scenario. 1. No arterial street improvements per the city's 6-Year TIP are completed. 2. The 12t' Avenue SW extension through Orchid Lane to SW 346a' Street is open to site traffic and, accordingly, this route is also assessed for traffic destined to the southwest as a separate or alternative option as shown on Figures 6 and 7 in "clouds". As noted above, however, the poor LOS implies this will more than likely not occur and so the poor LOS may be discounted as not applicable. In summary, with the foregoing worst -case scenario capacity analysis it appears that the project, in concert with the three adjacent projects of record and the future m-f project of Plemmon's Plateau, can be accommodated on the arterial network with no significant operational constraints. The combination of the Wynstone project and the three adjacent projects along with the m-f project, Plemmon's Plateau, will not adversely impact any of the described intersections: none will fall below the city's adopted minimum threshold, LOS E, (with v/c ratio less then 1.0) which has been established for SEPA concurrency. Access Street Design Considerations The project will gain it principal access via 10'h Avenue SW at SW Campus Drive. As shown on the appended LOS computations, the assumed roadway geometry for the new linkage LOS analysis includes only a single lane approach on the new 141h Avenue SW south leg. This is noted in the appended LOS analris under File RR-P6P. Further, as shown in the LOS computations, the signal for 10 Avenue SW is timed with concurrent north/south phasing. Naturally, if a 2-lane approach is constructed as a part of the 12� Avenue SW corridor project, and if that design incorporates a northbound right -turn -only (RTO) lane, then it will operate with a higher performance level. Essentially, from the LOS analysis, a single lane approach is entirely adequate for the needs of both Wynstone and the m-f project of Plemmon's Plateau. Christopher Brown 0 AD722-19O9 9688 Rainier Ave. S. -17- Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206 Last, recognizing that the proposed plat will also be connected via SW 339th Place to the adjacent Saghalie Junior High School and the adjoining city park, it is assumed that a standard pedestrian sidewalk on this new collector road is included so that school related pedestrian traffic is safely accommodated. Traffic Hazard Traffic accident data was obtained from city files for the interval 1999 — 2002 along the SW Campus Drive and S. 34e Street corridor from 215t Avenue SW to Pacific Highway South. The accident rate for the 21" Avenue SW—lst Avenue S. section was computed at 2.88 accidents per million vehicle miles of travel. The WSDOT published rate for an urban principal arterial is 2.97 accidents per million vehicle miles of travel. Accordingly, on the basis of this statistic there is no reason to assume that accidents on this section are occurring at a rate that is beyond reasonable expectations. In essence, with an accident rate that is comparable with typical principal arterial accident rates there is no reason to assume any significant adverse hazards that would be further impacted by the project. For the section from Ist Avenue S. to Pacific Highway S. the accident rate was computed at 6.77 per accidents per million vehicle miles of travel. This is a rather high accident rate and explains why the city's transportation improvement plan (TIP) contains Project Alumber &, that adds HOV lanes and a 2nd northbound left turn lane at Pacific Highway S. and a raised median that will significantly reduce mid -block accidents. Importantly, as shown later, the proposed Wynstone project contributes funding to this improvement program. The financial contribution will offset the project's impacts and is considered an appropriate mitigation element. Additionally, while the foregoing may be considered somewhat generalized in that the accident rate references are based on WSDOT published statistics, at the request of the city's staff review person, an additional analysis was undertaken. For this analysis the Control Chart Method was used. The level of significance set at 0.95 as commonly done. In the Control Chart Method a critical accident rate is calculated for each intersection based on the average accident rate for all sampled intersections in the network. Where the actual accident rate is larger than the critical rate (as highlighted in the following table) the deviation is most likely not due to chance but, rather, due to an unfavorable characteristic. This analysis will allow the city to review in depth how their existing system is functioning. -18- ChriBtopher Brown CS Awoeiate8 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 Project Number 8 — Adding HOV lanes, turn lanes and a raised median on S. 348' Street from 9tb Avenue S. to Pacific Highway S. The fair share mitigation fee is computed at: 12 trips/1,750 DHV X $7,242,000 = $49,659 Project Number 11— Widening to 5-lanes and adding bike lanes and illumination on South 356 h Street from 1st Avenue S. to Pacific Highway S. The fair share mitigation fee is computed at: 17 trips/3,539 DHV X $8,405,000 = $40,374 P_roiect Number 13 — SR 18 at SR 161, Enchanted Parkway S. Adding eastbound and westbound right turn lanes, a P westbound left turn lane, and a T'd lane on SR 161 southbound to 352" d. The fair share mitigation fee is computed at: 11 trips/5,473 DHV X $3,335,000 = $6,703 The grand total of $96,736 should be considered appropriate and sufficient for mitigating all site related traffic impacts. Last, while it may be noted that the connection of SW 339th Place to link SW Campus Drive/ 10th Avenue SW to both Saghalie Junior High School and Saghalie City Park is a major community benefit, particularly for those neighborhoods lying to the north of SW Campus Drive, the developer's participation in carrying out and implementing these improvements are code required for project approval and will be accomplished as the plait is developed to ensure a complete network. Diverted Traffic to SW 339t'' Place The estimated traffic diversion from 19th Way SW at both Saghalie Junior High School and Saghahe City Park onto the new SW Campus Drive/10`h Avenue SW intersection and thence via 12th Avenue SW onto the SW 339th Place linkage to this school and park is estimated to be 25 percent of the current (year 2003) p.m. peak hour volume. The current observed p.m. peak hour volume on 19ti' Way SW from May 10 field counts includes: 58 inbound trips 69 outbound trips The diversion onto SW 339tn Place is estimated to be as follows. -20- Chriatopher Brown CAS Awociate8 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 • An adjacent 19-unit, m-f project on the same property, yet to be formally proposed, is also included with this traffic analysis. + For this study, the m-f development is named Plemmons Plateau. • In addition to the Wynstone and Plemmons Plateau developments, three adjacent (pipeline) projects that may be completed in the same time frame are included. • These three pipeline projects are the plats of Orchid Lane, Pena Subdivision and Lake Haven Estates. ■ On completion of the Wynstone and Plemmons Plateau developments and the three pipeline projects an acceptable LOS is derived at those intersections impacted by 10 or more site generated trips in the horizon year of 2006. • To obtain an adequate LOS, minor revisions to the traffic signal phasing at two intersections is required. ■ The two signals requiring signal phasing modifications are located at S. 348th Street and l't Ave. S. and Campus Drive SW at IOth Avenue SW. • One portion of the SW 336th Street -SW Campus Drive-S. 348th Street corridor has an accident rate above the typical rate for principal arterial streets. It is proposed for improvement in the city's TIP. • Based on a Control Chart Analysis with p @ 0.95, two intersections have accident rates that are statistically significant. • Intersections with significant accident rates are located at South 348th Street and Pacific Highway S. (SR 99) and South 348th Street at Enchanted Parkway. • Off site traffic mitigation fees based on proportionate fair -share cost estimates with 2006 traffic forecasts are in the order of $96,736. • Since a portion of the project includes connecting SW Campus Drive to Saghalie Junior High School and Saghalie City Park and recognizing about 68 percent of the traffic on this new link is from the neighborhoods lying to the north a pro-rata share of the cost of this link should be considered to off -set the above mitigation fee. • The site's main access is at SW Campus Drive and I Avenue SW where the existing traffic signal is being modified to accommodate the new (south) leg of the intersection and a 2-lane approach is to be constructed. • Based on only the site's generated traffic, a single lane approach at the signal would be entirely sufficient for handling all site traffic. ■ Forecast traffic volumes for the 12t Avenue SW corridor project are shown in the traffic study for a neighboring project entitled Campus Crest. • JAbsent a traffic signal at the intersection of 13th Way SW/SW 356th Street the —�'�- :poor LOS in the horizon year suggests that this corridor will not be well used by site generated traffic in the peak hour. Alternate routes to the south will prevail. • 1In summary, the project can be accommodated on the street network without significant impacts. -22- Christopher brown Cn Amodate8 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 Continuation TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Appendix Table of Contents Year 2006 Anal sis with Pipeline Projects Only 9t' Avenue S./S. 348'i' Street 2006 without Project RR-H3P 27. 1'' Avenue S./S. 348' Street 2006 without Project RR-H4P 29. 6n' Avenue SW/SW Campus Drive 2006 without Project RR-H5P 31. 10'h Avenue SW/SW Campus Drive 2006 without Project RR-H6P 33, Pacific Highway S./S. 356 Street 2006 without Project RR-H7P 35. is` Avenue S./S. 35e Street 2006 without Project RR-H8P 37, 8n' Avenue S./S. 35e Street 2006 without Project RR-H9P 39, 21'' Avenue S./S. 35e Street 2006 without Project RR-H10P 41. 21't Avenue SIS. 336n' Street 2006 without Project RR-HI1P 43. Year 2006 Analysis with Pipeline Projects & Wynstone SF & MF Development Enchanted Parkway/S. 348t' Street 2006 with Project Pacific Highway S./S. 348'h Street 2006 with Project SP Avenue S./S. 34e Street 2006 with Project 1't Avenue S./S. 348'i' Street 2006 with Project 6n' Avenue SW/SW Campus Drive 2006 with Project I Oh Avenue SW/SW Campus Drive 2006 with Project Pacific Highway S./S. 356 h Street 2006 with Project I" Avenue S./S. 356t' Street 2006 with Project 8n' Avenue S./S. 356n' Street 2006 with Project 21't Avenue S./S. 356a` Street 2006 with Project 21'` Avenue S./S. 336't' Street 2006 with Project RR-P1P 45. RR-P2P 47. RR-P3P 49. RR-P4P 51. RR-H5P 53. RR-P6P 55. RR-P7P 57. RR-P8P 59. RR-P9P 61. RR-P 1 OP . 63 . RR-P11P 65. 13n' Way South/SW 356`a Street Analysis with 12th Avenue SW Corridor 13t' Way South/SW 356t' Street Current Volumes RR-C12P 67. 13"' Way South/SW 35e Street 2006 without Project RR-H12P 68. 13n' Way South/SW 356'k' Street 2006 with Project RR-P12P 69. Chrikopher Brown (?S Awociate8 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 Rachael Ridge 9th Avenue S.at Current Volumes, S. 348th Street 2003 File RR-C3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 3 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 03/30/04 16:27:06 APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 1'53 6 357 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 1.0 1.0 1.0 .84 .71 .84 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1611 1329 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 187 1408 19 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .90 .92 .90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3545 1805 SEQUENCES 14 14 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 40.79 7.01 57.19 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 12 5 NO YES RT TH LT 45 20 87 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 6.0 6.0 6.0 .84 .84 .84 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1606 1022 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 13 922 72 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .97 .97 .97 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3603 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 9th Avenue S.at S. 348th Street Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 3 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .80 Vehicle Delay 48.3 Sq 14 I �Phaser1 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 **/** ---------------_ ------------------- v ++++ North <+ + +> ++++> + + + v ------------------------------------- G/C= .340 G/C= .058 G/C= .477 G= 40.8" G= 7.0" G= 57.2" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=38.2% OFF=48.2% ------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=105.0 sec = 87.5% Y=15.0 03/30/04 16:26:47 Level of Service D sec = 12.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% e^ Lan Width/ - g/C-rxService Rate _ Adj- HCM 1 l L 19Q0u%Max I Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ f Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c Delay S eue N Approach 55.1 E+ _________ 12/1 335 548 190 .347 30.0 210 LT+RTI 12/1 I .424 I .340 .340 l 271 450 l 425 I .940 I 66.3 J*C+ El 470 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------ S Approach 28.7 C TH+RT 12/1 .257 .340 334 546 78 .143 27.6 C 89 ft LT l 12/1 .284 .340 202 338 l 104 l .300 l 29.6 l C 119 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ E Approach 60.8 E+ TH+RTI 24/2 .528 .477 11507 l 1690 1738 �1.028 I 60.9 *E+ 758 ftI LT 12/1 .241 .058 1 78 21 .200 54.8 D 33 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ W Approach 26.6 C+ ~ TH+RT- 24/2 366 -.477 1533 1717 964 561HI 22 9~I*C+l-420fftl LT 12/1 l .254 .058 l 1 l 78 74 l .705 74.8 E 116 ft 6,,, Rachael Ridge 03/30/04 loth Avenue SW at Campus Drive SW 16:37:34 Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 6 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 241 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 463 0 117 12.0 .0 12.0 1 0 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .81 .81 .81 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 0 1805 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 132 1392 0 .0 24.0 .0 0 2 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .98 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3547 0 SEQUENCES 12 12 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES NO CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 26.84 23.68 54.48 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 1 12 5 NO YES RT TH LT 0 0 0 .0 .0 .0 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 715 241 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .92 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3560 310 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 03/30/04 loth Avenue SW at Campus Drive SW 16:37:17 Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 6 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .70 Vehicle Delay 56.8 Level of Service E+ Sq 12 /I1 North I Phase l I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I ------------------------------------- * + ++++ **** <* +> <++++ <**** G/C= .224 G/C= .197 G/C= .454 G= 26.8" G= 23.7" G= 54.5" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=26.5% OFF=50.4% ------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=105.0 sec = 87.5% Y=15.0 sec = 12.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane ^^Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj ivolumel rYHCM I I L 90% Max l Group ------- I Lanesl Reqd Used I ----- - @C (vph) -_--_-------------------------------- @E v/c Delay S Queue 1 -- N Approach 48.2 D LT 12/1 I .271 .224 I 1 388 l 144 .356 I 39.8 *D+I I 186 ft E Approach 10.6 B+ I---TH+RTI24/2I.488I.693I-244512458I1560^- Ii-- - 635I10.6I*B+I-399-ftl - - - -- f- - - W Approach 129.5 F TH 24/2 .337 .454 1406- ^1616 777 23.1 356 ftLT 12/1 .921 I .454 I 91I 129 262 1.481 1.858 1 444.8 IC+l *F 238 ftI --------------------------------------------- Rachael Ridge 03/30/04 9th Avenue S.at S. 348th Street 16:28:10 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 3 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 165 6 384 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 1.0 1.0 1.0 .84 .71 .84 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1610 1787 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 201 1526 20 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .90 .92 .90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3546 1805 SEQUENCES 14 14 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 30.42 11.63 5.24 62.71 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 12 5 5 RT TH LT 48 22 95 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 6.0 6.0 6.0 .84 .84 .84 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1608 1129 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 14 999 78 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .97 .97 .97 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM- 0 3603 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 0, Rachael Ridge 03/31/04 9th Avenue S.at S. 348th Street 08:18:29 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 3 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .84 Vehicle Delay 56.1 Level of Service E+ Sq 14 North `' - Phase 1 IPhase 2 IPhase 3 I ------------------------------------- v ++++ ✓ - **** v + + + v ---------------------------------- G/C= .332 G/C= .043 G/C= .510 G= 43.2" G= 5.5" G= 66.3" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=37.0% OFF=45.2% ------------------------------------- C=130 sec G=115.0 sec = 88.5% Y=15.0 sec = 11.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lanerr Width/ g/C Service Rate lVolumel HAdj rT HCM„^ I l Lr'90% Maxl IQueue Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I --_ ----- ----- @C (vph) -- _ @E _ ____________________..__-----__ v/c Delay S N Approach 77.8 E TH+RT 12/1 .319 .332 251 531 204 33.7 C 248 ftLT 12/1 .456 .332 203 430 457 11.381 .041 l 97.4 l*F l 554 ftl l --__------------- -- S Approach 32.3 C TH+RT 12/1 .287 I .332 251 ` 530 l 83 .155 l 30.7 I C 1 104 ftl LT l 12/1 1 .318 .332 144 ! 307 113 .351 33_'-- -I-^ 5C141 ft- E Approach 64.5 E+ LT 12/1 12/1 I 271 I .510 043 l 1619 1858 l 1882 11..0286 l 62.4 1*41 E+ 838 ftl------------------------------------------------------------------------------ W Approach 33.3 C TH+RT 24/2 .398 .510 1647 1837 1044 22.4 462 ftl LT 12/1 I .284 i .043 l 1 51 80 1.568 1.039 l 175.9 JC+J *F 138 ft Rachael Ridge 03/30/04 loth Avenue SW at Campus Drive SW 16:35:25 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 6 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 241 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 499 0 126 12.0 .0 12.0 1 0 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .81 .81 .81 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 0 1805 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 142 1499 21 .0 24.0 .0 0 2 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .98 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3545 0 SEQUENCES 12 12 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES NO CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 15.66 3.05 96.29 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 1 6 12 NO YES RT TH LT 13 0 0 .0 12.0 .0 0 1 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1454 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 770 260 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .92 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3560 233 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge loth Avenue SW at Campus Drive SW 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 6 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .72 Vehicle Delay 70.6 Sq 12 111 North 1 Phased I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 ------------------------------- * + ++++ ++++ <* +> <++++ <++++ **** v **** +> ++++> + r^G/C=^.120r G/C= G/C= .741 G= 15.7" G= 3.0" G= 96.3" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=15.9% OFF=22.1% ------------------------------------- C=130 sec G=115.0 sec = 88.5% Y=15 03/30/04 16:34:58 Level of Service E 0 sec = 11.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane Width/ g/C Service„Rater^^Adj- lVolumel HCM l L 90% Maxl l Group I Lanesl Reqd Used l @C (vph) --------------------- @E v/c Delay - - - - - -------------_----- S Queue N Approach 267.1 F RT l 12/1 .354 .120 1 161 319 365.4 1*F1 507 ftLT l 12/1 1 .302 .120 1 1 1 182 156 11.636 .719 1 66.0 E+ 248 ft - S Approach 46.5 D ===TH+RT1-12/1 1-.270y1-.159-1----11- 200 1^N13 1- - - .056T146.5 1 D 1 25ftl ^- E Approach 5.2 A 1LT+TH+RT1 24/21�^- 5281.803- `-- 128461 2846 11703 1- - --- -- .59815.21A 1 303-ftl - - W Approach 87.1 F 37 37 837 11' .1 .741 1 261 261 11.317 l l---------------- ----------- Rachael Ridge 9th Avenue S.at S. 348th Street 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 3 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 03/30/04 16:24:51 APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 165 6 384 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 1.0 1.0 1.0 .84 .71 .84 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1610 1323 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 201 1526 20 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .90 .92 .90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3546 1805 SEQUENCES 14 14 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 43.16 5.54 66.30 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 12 5 NO YES RT TH LT 48 22 95 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 6.0 6.0 6.0 .84 .84 .84 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1608 969 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 14 1008 78 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .97 .97 .97 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3603 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 '. q7 I',' Rachael Ridge 9th Avenue S.at S. 348th Street 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary 03/30/04 16:22:13 Intersection Averages for Int # 3 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .84 Vehicle Delay 56.1 Level of Service E+ Sq 14 1 Phase- ` 1 ^ 1 Phase2 I ^ Phase 3 1 **/** ---------------------------------------- **** v North <+ + +> ++++> + + + v ------------------------------------- G/C= .332 G/C= .043 G/C= .510 G= 43.2" G= 5.5" G= 66.3" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=37.0% OFF=45.2% -------------------------------------- C=130 sec G=115.0 sec = 88.5% Y=15.0 sec = 11.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate lvolume�I Adj I - HCM I ^ L 90% Max Group I------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 77.8 E TH+RT 12/1 .319 .332 251 531 204 1.381 33.7 248 ftLT 12/1 l .456 l 332 203 430 457 1.041 97.4 JC *F l 554 ftl------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach 32.3 C TH+RT 12/1 .287 .332 l 251 l 530 l 83 .155 l 30.7 l C l 104 ftl LT 12/1 .318 .332 144 307 113 .351 33.5 C 141 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ E Approach 64.5 E+ TH+RT 24/2~ 567^ 510 1619 ~1808 ^ 1882y 64.5 I 833 ft LT l 12/1 .271 l .043 1 51 22 11.041 .286 l 62.4 I*E+ E+l 38 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W Approach 33.3 C TH+RT 24/2 .400 510^ 1647 1837 1053 22.5 J*C+J 466 ftl LT 112/1 I .284 l .043 l 1 51 80 1,573 1.039 l 175.9 F 138 ft Rachael Ridge 03/30/04 loth Avenue SW at Campus Drive SW 16:39:33 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 6 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 241 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 499 0 126 12.0 .0 12.0 1 0 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .81 .81 .81 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 0 1805 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 142 1499 51 .0 24.0 .0 0 2 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .98 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3543 0 SEQUENCES 12 12 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES NO CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 15.16 2.95 96.89 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 1 6 12 NO YES RT TH LT 28 0 4 .0 12.0 .0 0 1 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .85 1.00 .85 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1478 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 6 770 260 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .92 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3556 225 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 0�' Rachael Ridge loth Avenue SW at Campus Drive SW 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 6 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .73 Vehicle Delay 74.5 Sq 12 ---------------------------------------- Phase 1 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 I --------------------------------- + ++++ ++++ / <* +> <++++ <++++ **** v **** North <+ +> ++++> + + ++++ + + v -G/C= .117 G/C= .023 G/C= .745 G= 15.2" G= 3.0" G= 96.9" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=15.5% OFF=21.6% --------------------------------- C=130 sec G=115.0 sec = 88.5% Y=15.0 03/30/04 16:39:16 Level of Service E sec = 11.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane - Width/ g/C Service Rate �Volumel Adj - HCM - L Max 19Q0%ueue Group I Lanesl Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) @E v/c Delay S N Approach 286.4 F ________ 154 319 11.697 92.8 368.8 J*F 1249 509 LT 112/1 I .302 I .117 1 175 I.117 156 .743 E ftI S Approach 48.0 D ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 l .277 l .155 I 166I 48.0 1I197I38-I-^- -'- - - - ._-- I DI - 58 ftl - E Approach 5.1 A ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 I .535 i .806 12857 12857 11735 I .607 l 5.1 l A l 303 ftl ---------------------------- W Approach 93.0 F TH+RT 24/2 369I .745 I 2650 I 2650 I844 11.318 5.6 J*A 1195 ft JLT 12/1 .000 745I135 165 283 .695 f 353.5 F 130 ft -------_-----w_---_--------- r`� Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst C. V. Brown Agency/Co. Wynstone Date Performed 313012004 Analysis Time Period P.M. Peak Intersection 13th Way SW/SW 356th St. Jurisdiction City of Federal Way Analysis Year Current Year - 2004 Project ID File RR-C12P EastlWest Street: SW 356th Street North/South Street: 13th Way SW Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 27 601 8 9 1079 39 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0.91 29 0.91 660 0.91 8 0.91 9 0.91 1185 0.91 42 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 4 -- - Median Type Qndivided -fw LiL RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 6 0 3 37 0 14 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 0 3 40 0 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 0 1 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LT R v (vph) 29 9 9 40 15 C (m) (vph) 575 931 146 67 440 vlc 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.60 0.03 95% queue length 0.16 0.03 0.20 3.52 0.11 Control Delay 11.6 8.9 31.3 131.1 13.5 LOS B A D F B Approach Delay -- -- 31.3 99.0 Approach LOS -- -- D F Copyright 02000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved file://C:\Documents%20and%20S ettings\Administrator\Local%20S ettings\Temp\u2kA.tmp Version 4.1 z 3/30/2004 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information (Site Information 13th Way SW/SW 356thSt. Analyst C. V. Brown Intersection Agency/Co. Wynstone Jurisdiction City of Federal Way Date Performed 313012004 Analysis Year 2006 Baseline Volumes Analysis Time Period P.M. Peak Project ID Wynstone File RR-H12P East/West Street: SW 356th Street North/South Street: 13th Way SW Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 29 647 9 10 1162 42 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 710 9 10 1276 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - -- 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 6 0 3 40 0 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 0 3 43 0 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 0 1 0 Percent Grade (v/o) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 1 Configuration LTR L T R Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR L T R v (vph) 31 10 9 43 0 16 C (m) (vph) 529 892 122 54 48 410 v/c 0.06 0.01 0.07 0.80 0.00 0.04 95% queue length 0.19 0.03 0.24 5.74 0.00 0.12 Control Delay 12.2 9.1 36.9 247.7 80.0 14.1 LOS B A E F F B Approach Delay -- - 36.9 184.4 Approach LOS -- -- E F Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 Uy file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Administrator\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2kll.tmp 3/30/2004 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst C. V. Brown Agency/Co. Wynstone Date Performed 313012004 Analysis Time Period P.M. Peak Intersection 13th Way SW/SW 356th St. Jurisdiction City of Federal Way Analysis Year 2006 with Project Project ID Wynstone File RR-P12P East/West Street: SW 356th Street North/South Street: 13th Way SW Intersection Orientation: East-West Period hrs : 1.00 -IStudy Vehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Mallor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 J 4 5 6 L T R L T [ R 'Volume 34 647 9 10 1162 52 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 1 710 1 9 10 1276 57 Percent Heavy Vehicles I - 0 r -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Southbound Minor Street Northbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 6 0 3 44 0 18 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0.91 6 0.91 0 0.91 3 0.91 48 0.91 0 0.91 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 1 Configuration LTR L T R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR L T R v (vph) 37 10 J 48 0 19 C (m)(vph) 524 892 118 52 47 407 v/c 0.07 0.01 0.08 0.92 0.00 0.05 195% queue length 0.23 0.03 0.25 7.54 0.00 0.15 Control Delay 12.4 9.1 38.0 351.2 81.6 14.3 LOS B A E F F B Approach Delay -- -- 38.0 255.6 Approach LOS -- -- E F Copyright 0 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 z 0 r file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Administrator\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k16.tmp 3/30/2004 J, i\9 0 29 200 2 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT lv, DEPT. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Preliminary Plat of Wynstone 2. Name of Applicant: Brad Plemmons 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Brad Plemmons 101 T St. SE Auburn, WA. 98002 (206) 293-1434 4. Date checklist prepared Contact: James Jaeger, P.E. Jaeger Engineering 9419 S. 204 Place Kent, WA. 98031 (253) 850-0934 May 10, 2003, Revised Dec. 16, 2003 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal- Way - Planning Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Begin construction in summer, 2004, or as soon as possible after receiving all required approvals and development. permits. Project will continue with most work being performed during Summer/Fall of 2004. A potential phase 2 multi -family use will be the construction of multi -family units on lot 45. This is within the RM2400 zone. 7. Do you, have any plans for future additions; expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The construction of the housing units will be additional activity within this project. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Wetland assessment by Habitat Technologies (4/8/03), preliminary grading plan, free survey and inventory by ❑ryco Surveying, storm drainage prelim. technical information report by Jaeger Engineering, (7/29/03), traffic impact analysis by Christopher Brown & Assoc (August, 2003), geotechnical analysis by Bergquist Engineering (12/15/03). Other investigations as may be required by the City during the review process. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 3 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, If known. Approvals/ permits will be required from the City of Federal Way for an amended CZA, SEPA review, preliminary plat, engineering/construction plans, final plat. Permits will be required from Lakehaven Utility District for water and sewer systems. A building permit will be required for each structure that will be constructed on this project. 11. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposed project is a 45 lot residential subdivision. The site is 13.49 acres and is zoned both RM 2400 with CZA and RS 7.2. There are 2 existing lots. There are no existing improvements on these lots. The site is generally second growth forest with tall grass and brush understory. The project will produce 45 lots, with a typical size of 7200 SF in the RS 7.2 zone and 5000 SF in the RM 2400 zone. One of the lots within the RM 2400 zone will be set aside for future multi -family construction. Access to the new plat wiA be provided by a several new public roads. The primary road will be a .through roadconnecting the new plat of Orchid Lane with SW Campus Drive, At the 1 Orh Ave SW intersection. A sec o hrough street will connect from the new primary street to SW 3 r1 St., at Saghalie Jr. High School. The site will include water, sewer drainage and utilities that will need to be constructed. That portion of the site within the RM 2400, CZA will need to secure an amendment to the CZA that would allow single family house construction within this CZA zone. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, If reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Location: The property is located on the southwest side of SW Campus Drive at I Oth Ave SW. The property extends south and is adjacent to the recently approved plat of Orchid Lane. The site is also adjacent to and east of Saghalie Jr. High. The site is situated in Section 19, Township 21 N, Range 4E in the City of Federal Way, King County. Legal Description: The legal description is shown on the preliminary plat plan. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth 4 a. General description of the site (under line one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes mountainous, other. b. What Is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope on the site is approximately 507o located along the north property line, also the right-of-way line with SW Campus Drive. C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Minor soils investigation and history of surrounding land indicates that the soils are a sandy loam type. These are generally classified as Alderwood type soils by USDA. There may also be sands located at.the upper elevations of the site. There is no farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any tilling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. This site has a high point near the southwest corner of the site. The site slopes to the east and to the west from that high point. The slopes to the east are much steeper. The slopes to the west are fairly mild. There is a wetland located on the adjacent property to the south, with the buffer extending into the site. The new primary access road (1.0+h Ave. SW) will require an extensive cut at the north property line. The cul-de-sac, 12th, Place SW, will. require a substantial fill. These two new roads will require a cross -slope cut and fill to traverse the slope. The amount of cut/fill will be approx. 40000 CY of cut and 16000 CY of fill. Any necessary structural fill will be received from a local source of acceptable material. This source is not yet known. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, during rainy construction periods. The disturbed soils could be picked up by runoff water and carried down -gradient. This would occur before the site is stabilized and covered. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (tor example, asphalt or buildings)? The -impervious surfaces for the proposed project will include the new roads and sidewalks, as well as the new living unit structures, driveways, decks, walkways and other residential elements. The approx. percentage of area of impervious surface will be 50%. 5 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The construction of the project must comply with the erosion control measures as dictated by City code. More specific measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth include installation of silt fence, sedimentation traps or ponds, interceptor ditches, seeding or mulching of exposed surfaces that are expected to remain open for long periods of time, the application of water to exposed surfaces during dry seasons for dust control. Additional measures will include a quarry spall construction entrance/exit pad and filter traps inside of existing and new catch basins. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust (suspended particulates) and construction exhaust emissions to the air will occur during the temporary construction period. Automobile emissions will result from the completed project from the resident traffic. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. In general, there are no off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the proposed development. There will be periodic automobile exhaust from the adjacent road, SW Campus Drive. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Contractors will be required to implement standard practices for dust suppression such as the application of water to exposed surfaces, during construction. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a wetland on the adjacent property to the south. This wetland is a class 2 wetland with a 100' buffer. The wetland buffer extends into site and will be designated as a sensitive areas Tract.. Additionally, there is an un-regulated wetland located near the southeast corner of the project. These wetlands were reviewed and delineated by Habitat Technologies in a report dated April 8, 2003. 6 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The project will require work within 200 ffi..of the off -site wetland. There is an existing sewer easement and future sewer main at the edge of the wetland buffer. None of the proposed work will be within the 100' buffer. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general descripffon, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions are proposed. 5) Does -the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The site is not located within a 100-year flood plain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? K so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. The proposal does not involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantifies if known. No groundwater will be withdrawn and no water will be discharged to groundwater as part of this project. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, If any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, chemicals, agricultural: etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No discharge. The existing.houses have all be connected to the public sewer system that is within SW Campus Drive or at Saghalie Jr. High. C. Water Run-off (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of run-off (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantifies, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water run-off from all impervious surfaces will be collected in road gutters, catch basins, roof drains, etc. and directed into a piping system. The pipes will direct the water to a water quality treatment facility composed of a constructed wetland. The detention for this project will be within the regional detention facility at Panther Lake. A fee for use of the regional detention facility of $1728 per acre will be assessed to this project. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Waste materials could enter the ground water if they are introduced into the system and are not removed by water quality facilities. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and run-off water impacts, if any: The design and construction of the project will be in compliance with the City of Federal Way codes. Best Management Practices are proposed for erosion/sedimentation control during construction. Facilities for drainage control including gutters, piping and catch basins with sediment catches will be used. Facilities for water quality enhancement such as a constructed wetland will be used. A. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on site: deciduous tree: _alder, maple, birch, cottonwood evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other -ornamental shrubs Grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation Vdi be removed or altered? The site is densely covered with trees. Many of the trees will need to be removed for the construction of the roads and utilities and the grading associated with the road construction. However, many of the trees around the perimeter of the site will be retained during the site development. The majority of these save trees are along the south and west property lines. None of the trees in the wetland buffer will be cut. Approx. 150 trees will be saved. However, many of these trees will likely be removed during the building of houses. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site None are known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, If any: 8 Many of the existing trees around the west and south perimeter will be saved during the site work construction. This will potentially allow sporadic trees to be saved around the proposed houses on those lots, depending on the location of the house. Tha trees located along the eastern portion of the SW Campus Drive landscape setback will be saved. A tree inventory plan has been provided. Much of the future landscaping will be new residential type landscaping consisting of lawn, shrubs and ornamental trees. The drainage pond areas will have perimeter landscaping installed. The utitlities will generally be located within the roadways to minimize additional clearing needed for their installation. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: X Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: X Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: s ua irrel. Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Eastern gray squirrel and songbirds are typical of western Washington forests and residential neighborhoods. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered species are known to be on or near the site. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The Puget Sound area is part of the Pacific Flyway. Birds that inhabit the area vary seasonally due to migrations. However, the area is not part of a larger, permanently preserved migratory bird habitat. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The energy needs for the project site will be met through services offered by Puget Sound Energy. PSE will be servicing the project site with natural gas and electricity. These services will be used for heating, appliances and general household uses. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? U so, generally describe. No. The site and its surrounding properties slope to the north/northeast and do not have prime exposure to solar potential. 9 C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The contractors will comply with applicable City of Federal Way and other energy conservation requirements, such as the UBC. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. There are no known environmental heath hazards that would be of potential concern during construction of the proposed, project. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. It is not anticipated that there will be any additional demand for special emergency services to serve the site as a result of the proposed project. Typical emergency services such as fire, police, medical may be required as is typical for any residential development. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Since there are no known environmental health hazards associated with the project, no measures are proposed. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area -which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The current noise in the vicinity and on the project site is typical of a residential setting. Background noise includes traffic noise from the roadways in the vicinity of the project site, outdoor equipment such as lawn mowers, and the delivery of manufactured goods being loaded and unloaded from trucks on the project site. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The operation of construction vehicles on -site during clearing, grading, sitework and the construction of the proposed houses will cause a short-term increase in daytime noise levels in the project vicinity. Construction would take place during normal hours for construction as permitted by the City ordinances. The levels of noise on a long-term basis will be affected by the adjacent and new roads, but this is not only caused by the project. 3) Proposed measures to'reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Contractors will be required to confine on -site construction activities to daytime hours, in accordance with City ordinances. 10 S. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The existing site is vacant and undeveloped. The property to the north is the SW Campus Drive right-of-way. The property to the south is a recently approved subdivision called Orchid Lane. The property to the west is Saghalie Junior High School. The property to the east is an undeveloped parcel, but there is a proposed single family residential plat currently under review by the City. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. C. Describe any structures on the site. There are no structures on the existing site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? None e. What Is the current zoning classification of the site? The northern portion of the site is zoned RM 2400 with a CZA. The southern portion of the site is zoned RS 7.2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Multi -family and high -density single family. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? The site is not within a Shoreline Environment. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? It so, specify. No. I. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Based on 44 proposed single family lots at an estimated average of 3.5 people per house, and 17 estimated multi -family units with an estimated 3.0 people per unit, there will be approx. 205 people residing in the completed development. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 11 None. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposal will be consistent with the proposed zoning and Comprehensive Land Use Plan Designations for the property. The new -subdivision to the south is of a similar use. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. 44 new detached single family housing units will be provided. It is anticipated that these units will be in the middle -income price range. Addition�ly, the future multi -family lot may produce up to 17 attached units. These would be in the lower to middle income price range. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. None- C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None. 10. Aesthetics What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what Is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest height of the typical proposed house structure -is will be 30 ft. per City zoning code limits. This applies to both the single family and multi -family sites. The principal exterior building materials for the structures will be wood siding and comp shingle roofs. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Existing local views from SW Campus Drive would be altered. The existing natural, treed scenery would be changed to a landscaped, residential scene. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The required landscaping along SW Campus Drive will soften the impacts along that arterial. The City code requirements for multi -family developments will also provide a measure of landscaped screen along any boundaries with single family developments. The City's multi -family design guidelines will provide methods for screening and other mitigation measures. 12 11. Light and Glare a. What type -of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposed project will install street lighting as required by the City for residential developments. It is likely the light and glare will slightly increase during the night as the result of the proposed project. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None that we are aware of. C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Existing off -site sources of light and glare in the project vicinity would be from streetlights and motor vehicles operating on adjacent roadways. These sources or light and glare are not considered to significantly affect the proposed project. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light or glare impacts, if any: No measures are proposed to reduce or control light or glare impacts. 12. . Recreation a. What designated and Informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Saghalie Jr. High has an -activity field, play equipment and tennis courts. It is located adjacent to the site. The BPA trail is located in the vicinity and the King County aquatic center is several blocks away to the east along SW Campus Drive. b. Would tAe proposed project displace any -existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Me C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Per City code, a fee in lieu of on -site recreation space will be paid to the City to improve the local recreation areas. No on -site recreation area is proposed. A recreation space within the future multi -family lot may be required depending upon the terms of any CZA amendments. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed,on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. 13 There are no known places or objects listed for, national, state or local preservation registers within or near the project. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. There are no known landmarks or evidence of historic; archaeological; scientific; or cultural importance located on or near the site. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any, None proposed. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed project's primary access will be from the construction of a new connector street, 1 Oth/12th Ave. SW accessing SW Campus Drive. Also, a second connection to SW 340th St. will be provided via the proposed on -site road, SW 339th St. Several other on -site cul-de-sacs will be constructed as a public roads. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is served by Public Transit along SW Campus Drive, along the north property line. C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will likely provide 192 parking spaces based on four parking spaces per unit. There are no existing paring spaces on this property. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private), The frontage along SW Campus Drive will be improved with pavement widening, curb, gutter and sidewalk. A new traffic signal will be installed to augment the existing traffic signals at the intersection of SW Campus Drive and the new 1Oth Ave. SW. street. The new internal streets, 1 Oth Ave. SW, SW 339th St., 13th Ct. SW and 12th Place SW will be constructed as public roads with curb gutter and sidewalk, per City standards. There are no proposed private roads. e. - Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. 14 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. It is generally considered that one residential unit will generate 10 vehicle trips per day. With this ratio, the estimated new vehicular trips will be 480 per day. There will be approx. 1 peak AM and PM trip per day per lot. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The development of the site will partially mitigate the transportation impacts by constructing the IOth/12th Ave. SW connector, the off -site connection to SW 340th St., the installation of additional traffic signal at the 1 Oth Ave. SW/ SW Campus Drive intersection, the frontage improvements along SW Campus Drive. If required, traffic mitigation fees will be paid to the City on a per lot basis. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will result in a potential increased need for fire protection, medical and police protection services. It will also increase the demand on the school system. The need for these services are typical for a residential development. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The required impact fees will be paid. The finished lots will be added to the tax base to provide tax support for the public services. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, sewer, refuse service, telephone, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Proposed utilities for the project include the extension of water, sewer, electricity, gas and telephone within the plat. These services are generally located within the future public right-of-way. The services will be provided by: Sewer: Lakehaven Utility District. Water: Lakehaven Utility District. Electricity & Gas: Puget Sound Energy. Telephone: Qwest Cable TV: Comcast cablevision. It is anticipated that the water main will be an 8" or a 10" diameter ductile iron pipe installed along the outer edge of the proposed road pavement. The sewer main will be 15 an 8" diameter PVC pipe that is generally constructed near the center of the roadways. The storm drainage system will generally be 12" or 18" diameter polyethylene pipe that is installed under the curbs of the new street. The gas, phone, electrical and cable services are generally installed in a common trench located at the back of the sidewalks. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: V r Name Printed: 4&— f Date: (71 1 LO O 3 el�� HA6ITAT TECHNOLOGIES April 8, 2003 Mr. Brad Plemmons 101 "T" Street SE Auburn, Washington 98002 RECEIVED JUN 2 6 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT, RE: Wetland and Drainage Corridor Assessment Rachael Ridge Residential Community, City of Federal Way, King County Dear Mr. Plemmons, Following your request, Habitat Technologies has completed an onsite wetland and drainage corridor assessment of the two individual parcels that composed the proposed Rachael Ridge Residential Community within the City of Federal Way, King County, Washington. The project site was located to the southeast of the Saghalie Junior High School and Saghalie Park and was bounded on the north by SW Campus Drive (Figure 1). Onsite assessment followed the established criteria and methods as defined within the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987 Manual), the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Wash. Manual), the Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Forest Practice Rules, and the City of Federal Way wetlands and streams ordinance. BACKGROUND INFORMATION National Wetland Inventory Mapping The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) mapping completed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This mapping resource did not identify any wetlands or drainage corridors within or adjacent to the project site (Figure 2). State of Washington Priority Habitats and Species The State of Washington Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) Mapping was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This mapping resource did not identify any priority habitats or priority species within or adjacent to the project site (Figure 3). State of Washington Department of Fisheries Stream Catalog The State of Washington Department of Fisheries Stream Catalog was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This mapping resource did not identified any streams within or adjacent to the project site. wetlands, streams, fisheries, wildlife -- mitigation and permitting solutions 1 P.O. Box 1088, Puyallup, Washington 98371 Rachael Ridge 03048 voice 253-845-5119 fax 253-841-1942 e-mail habitattech@qwest.net King County Wetland and Stream Inventory The King County Wetland and Stream Inventory was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This mapping resource did not identify any wetlands or drainage corridors within or adjacent to the project site. Soil Mapping The soil mapping inventory completed by the Soils Conservation Service was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This mapping identified the soils throughout the project site as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. Alderwood soil is moderately well drained, formed in glacial till, and is not listed as "hydric" (Figure 4). Wetland Studies for Adjacent Parcels The survey for the Plat of Orchic Lane was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This plat is located directly south of the Rachael Ridge project site. This surveyed detailed a City of Federal Way Category 2 Wetland directly south of the southwestern corner of the Rachael Ridge project site. ONSITE EVALUATION Evaluation Methodologies Onsite wetland and drainage corridor assessment was completed on March 17 and March 26, 2003. This assessment followed the methodologies and procedures defined in the 1987 Manual, the Wash. Manual, the WDNR Forest Practice Rules, and City of Federal Way wetlands and streams ordinance. Wetlands are transitional areas between aquatic and upland habitats. In general terms, wetlands are lands where the extent and duration of saturation with water is the primary factor determining the nature of soil development and the types of plant and animal communities living in the soil and on its surface (Cowardin, et al., 1979). Wetlands are generally defined within land use regulations as "areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions" (1987 Manual). Wetlands exhibit three essential characteristics, all of which must be present for an area to meet the established criteria within the Wash. Manual and the 1987 Manual. These essential characteristics are: 1. Hydrophytic Vegetation: A predominance of plants that are typically adapted for life in saturated soils. 2 Rachael Ridge 03048 2. Hydric Soil: A soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper horizons. 3. Wetland Hydrology: Permanent or periodic inundation, or soil saturation to the surface, at least seasonally. A stream is generally defined as a location where surface waters produce a defined channel or bed. A defined channel or bed is typically an area which demonstrates clear evidence of the passage of water and includes, but not limited to, bedrock channels, gravel beds, sand and silt beds, and defined channel swales. A stream need not contain water year-round. A stream typically does not include irrigation ditches, canals, storm or surface water run-off devices, or other artificial watercourses unless the constructed watercourse conveys a stream which naturally occurred prior to the construction of such watercourse. Boundaries between wetland and non -wetland areas were established by examining the transitional gradient between wetland criteria along a number of east to west transects through the site. Onsite activities were completed in accordance with criteria and procedures established in the 1987 Manual and the Wash. Manual. Delineation was performed using the routine methodology for areas smaller than five acres. Field data sheets are provided in Appendix A. Field Observations The entire project site was dominated by a mature, second growth Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesh) forest plant community. The forest canopy included a scattering of mature Western red cedar (Thuja plicata), Western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), red alder (Alnus rubra), big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), cascara (Rhamnus purshiana), and cherry (Prunus spp.). The understory included Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis), vine maple (Acer circinatum), hazelnut (Corylus cornuta), salal (Gaultheria shallon), Oregon grape (Berberis nervosa and Berberis aquifolium), Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procera), evergreen blackberry (Rubus laciniatus), Pacific blackberry (Rubus ursinus), Pacific red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), red huckleberry (Vaccinium parvifolium), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), holly (Ilex spp.), oceanspray. (Holodiscus discolor), wild rose (Rosa gymnocarpa), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilium), and sword fern (Polystichum munitum). This plant community was identified as non-hydrophytic in character (i.e. typical of uplands). As sample plots throughout this plant community the soil was a mixed gravelly loam to gravelly sandy loam and did not exhibit redoximorphic features. Field indicators of wetland hydrology were also absent (see representative sample plots SPA2, SPA3, and SPZ1 in Appendix A). A single, very small depression was identified within the southeastern portion of the project site (Figure 5). This depression appeared to have been formed by tree falls 3 Rachael Ridge 03048 and was identified as less than 500 square feet in total size. The plant community within this small depression was dominated by buttercup (Ranunculus repens), slough sedge (Carex obnupta), and stinging nettle (Urtica dioica). The edge of this depression was dominated by salmonberry, salal, oceanspray, cascara, vine maple, and Oregon grape. The plant community within this small depression was identified as hydrophytic in character (i.e. typical of wetlands). As identified at sample plots within this small depression the surface soil was dominated by organic materials and loam. The subsoil was dominated by a mixed gravelly loam and exhibited prominent redoximorphic features. Field indicators of wetland hydrology were present. In addition, this small depression appeared to remain ponded for short periods of time following seasonal storm events. A depression was observed to the south of the southwestern corner of the project site. This depression was dominated by a forested plant community that included crabapple (Pyrus fusca), black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), red alder, Pacific willow (Salix lasiandra), and Western red cedar. The understory included Sitka willow (Salix sitchensis), sapling trees, salmonberry, Pacific ninebark (Physocarpus capitatus), reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), reed mannagrass (Glyceria grandis), slough sedge, small -fruited bulrush (Scirpus microcarpus), lady fern (Athyrium filix-femina), horsetail (Equisetum arvense), skunk cabbage (Lysichitum americanum), and nightshade (Solanum dulcamara). This plant community was identified as hydrophytic in character. This offsite depression had been flagged as a part of the assessment of the Plat of Orchic Lane. The majority of the field flags were still in place and appeared to continue to accurately defined the edge of this depressional area. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Onsite assessment was completed during March 2003 following the methods and procedures defined within both the Wash. Manual, the 1987 Manual, the WDNR Forest Practice Rules, and the City of Federal Way wetlands and streams ordinance. The project site was dominated by a mature, second growth Douglas fir forest plant community. This assessment identified only a single, very small depression in the southeastern portion of the project site that met the established criteria for designation as "wetland." In addition, no area was identified onsite to exhibit characteristics of a "stream." The identified onsite, small wetland was identified as less than 500 square feet in total size and located within an isolated depression. This small wetland was dominated by a herbaceous plant community. Since this wetland was less than 2,500 square feet in total size and to not exhibit characteristics associated with either a City of Federal Way Category 1 or a Category 2 Wetland, this small wetland would not appear to be regulated by the City of Federal Way. 4 Rachael Ridge 03048 A City of Federal Way Category 2 Wetland was identified directly south of the southwestern corner of the project site. This offsite wetland appeared accurately defined onsite and within the survey for the Plat of Orchic Lane. While this wetland does not enter the project site the associated 100-foot standard City of Federal Way protective buffer for this offsite wetland would extend onto the southwestern corner of the project site. RECOMMENDATION The City of Federal Way regulates development activities in and around wetland areas. In addition, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Washington State Department of Ecology regulate activities undertaken within or with the potential to impact "waters of the U.S." (Corps) and "waters of the State" (WDFWMDOE). City of Federal Way; Division 7 — Regulated Wetlands Should site development planning move forward it is the recommendation of Habitat Technologies that the boundary of the offsite wetland within the Plat of Orchic Land be identified and that the standard 100-foot buffer be defined within the site plan for Rachael Ridge. Except as allowed through by the City of Federal Way, no land surface modification may take place and no structure or improvements may be located within the regulated wetland buffer. The City of Federal Way may allow buffer averaging when the wetland or the buffer which is proposed to be reduced contains habitat types which have been so permanently impacted that reduced buffers do not pose a detriment to the existing or expected habitat functions. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Section 404 Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) prohibits the discharge of dredged or fill material into "Waters of the United States" without a permit from the Corps of Engineers (Corps). The Corps has jurisdiction over freshwater systems waterward from the ordinary high water line of a water body or waterward from the upland boundary of the adjacent wetland. The definition of fill materials includes the replacement of aquatic areas with dry land, grading which changes the surface contour of a wetland, and mechanized land clearing in wetlands. For the purposes of Section 404 permitting the Corps makes the final determination as to whether an area meets the wetland definition and would be subject to regulation under the Corps program. Currently the Corps has two specific types of permits which apply to wetland fill proposals. These two types are a series of specific Nationwide Permits and the Individual Permit. The Nationwide Permit process identifies specific categories of work that can be undertaken following a set of specific conditions applicable to each Nationwide Permit number. 5 Rachael Ridge 03048 The Corps requires an Individual Permit where a proposed activity within an identified jurisdictional wetland area can not be authorized under one of the Nationwide Permits. Within the Individual Permit process the Corps undertakes a much more in-depth review of the proposed project and the proposed impacts. The Corps must evaluate whether the benefits derived from the project outweigh the foreseeable environmental impacts of the project's completion. All projects that proceed forward using either one of the Nationwide Permits or the Individual Permit process must also comply with the provisions of the Endangered Species Act. As defined by a recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions the Corps of Engineers does not typically regulated "isolated" wetlands pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Under this decision "isolated" wetlands do not exhibit a continuous surface water connection to other, downstream aquatic system. State of Washington Department of Ecology Proposed action undertaken through either of the Corps of Engineers processes (Nationwide or Individual) are also subject to the provisions of the Washington State Department of Ecology Section 401 Water Quality Certification Process. Projects that may be exempt from Corps of Engineers Section 404 jurisdiction may still require review by the Washington State Department of Ecology to ensure consistency with State water quality protection provisions. Thank you for allowing Habitat Technologies the opportunity to assist with this project. Should you have any questions or require additional assistance please call me at 253- 845-5119. Sincerely, Thomas D. Deming cc. Jaeger Engineering, 9419 South 204t" Place, Kent, Washington 98031 6 Rachael Ridge 03048 FIGURES Rachael Ridge 03048 L: s.aasna � Nt HABITAT Figure 7 TECHNOLOGIES Site Vicinity �; •A'SS�. A5 �$ r �rr �' s � � YA La A) AQ PA'a Y PFO tln �f 1 HABITAT TECHNOLOGIES psC2C Figure 2 NWI Resource Mapping I l _ � w l ` 71FL 4 J� �. 19 ! ,. I 15 d ` l 4 - iJP I O I =�a- - + 8, r HABITAT Figure 3 TECHNOLOGIES PHS Resource Mapping —.,�^' :.. ' • _•yam � _ . ■ I+ir •I'-. _ rLY ��-w.• . i~ ..i"'-. - . j ti- �_ _ .�b�r.gx' .:L. - _ - - _ 1. •i_::'i•. ,�i :. -_ - _ _ +a .S.ry%.><r- .-�;_•--y':. ��1k�. .y 1 IMF.. .�-5i�` - � :� ;a,.' - iE.. - ��•� . -✓.� �• Vie.,..§'•• •x`Y ��L-�� `._�2en� �...:��.,ie; - � :� .. ��� Y; ...�.:... .r. �i. .•: z,:';� '"�': "stir' ., � � :r: � ....- - _: o,;: ; 'i _ - ■. .'s �-. by , -:1.. • • :k:. '���� r.'-.r'1i — - �i .ham ,;; -�{�.ir �r�. �� •'- .�'• rr• �.. = ��", ::ia,s: -� �.. ,•�;. :`� � ::.,4: Nam• �:, '�, , .. — _.= -_�•�,,,,,,'� _ F� `7 .fir ::)� !> i• r? ± dry: s. . �]��Y ♦♦ p A 7. V. Ewt 0.1 y=.. ti a ..� Lae !! EvB lr �> ;-f- • t :' Y = soh 74 51 Ann E3 •. 8roo Bh- :r,a r AgD e h4 EVC1. gD Evc ■ ST `•I� • _ fl ;- . ■ -= -on r64_ `..ABC HABITAT Figure 4 TECHNOLOGIES Soil Mapping REFERENCE LIST Adamus, P.R., E.J. Clairain Jr., R.D. Smith, and R.E. Young. 1987. Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET); Volume II: Methodology, Operational Draft Technical Report Y-87, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Office of Biological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, FWS/OBS-79/31. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. Hitchcock, C.L., A. Cronquist. 1977. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press. Seattle, Washington. Reppert, R.T., W. Sigleo, E. Stakhiv, L. Messman, and C. Meyers. 1979. Wetland Values - Concepts and Methods for Wetland Evaluation. Research Report 79-R1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soils Conservation Service. Soils Survey of Pierce County Area Washington, February 1979. Washington State Department of Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Publication Number 96-94. Washington State Department of Fisheries, Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization, Volume 1., 1975 8 Rachael Ridge 03048 APPENDIX A - FIELD DATA FORMS Rachael Ridge 03048 1 SAMPLE PLOT SPA1 Project/Site Applicant/Owner: Investigator: DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL) Rachael Ridge Date: County: Habitat Technologies Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? YES NO Is the area a potential Problem area? YES NO State: Community ID: Transect ID: 17 MAR 03 King Washington VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have morphological adaptations to wetlands with an *) n i. __* 01- -f- Q --- tnc C+rntpim Inriiratnr I r)nminnnt Plant SnPf:}PS Stratum Indicator 1 Rubus spectabilis S FAC+ 2. Urtica dioica H FAC+ 3. Ranunculus repens H FACW 4. 5. 6. I 7. 8. Percent of Dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100% (except FAC-). Include species noted (*) as showing morphological adaptations to wetlands Describe Morphological Adaptations: Remarks: Small, shallow depression formed by tree falls HYDROLOGY Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage Aerial Photograph Other No Recorded Data Available FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Depth of Surface Water: Depth to Free Water Pit: surface Depth to Saturated Soil: Wetland Hydrology Indicators: x Inundated x Saturated in upper 12" x Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 " x Water -Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Onsite assessment during early growing season and storm events Appears to drain poorly and pond for short times following seasonal storm events Field indicators of wetland hydrology present Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Taxonomy (Subgroup) Entic Durochrepts Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) 0-4 4-20 Hydric Soil Indicators: 10YR 2/1 10YR 4/1 Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor x Probable Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions x Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Remarks: Mottle Colors (Munsell Moist) 10YR 5/6 SAMPLE PLOT SPA1 Drainage Class: Mod. well Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type YES NO Mottle Texture, Concretions, Abundance/Contrast Rhizospheres, etc. Duff and loam Common prom. Gravelly loam x Concretions x High Organic Content in Surface Layer Organic Streaking Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks) Soil appears to drain poorly following seasonal storm events Prominent redoximorphic features present Field indicators of h dric soil present WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES NO Hydric Soils Present? YES NO Wetland Hydrology Present? YES NO Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland? YES Remarks: WETLAND CRITERIA MET Shallow depression formed by tree falls Appears to drain poorly and pond for short periods following seasonal storm events. Ponding and other evidence of wetland hydrology patterns evident i SAMPLE PLOT SPA2 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL) Project/Site Rachael Ridge Applicant/Owner: Investigator: Habitat Technologies Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? YES NO Is the area a potential Problem area? YES NO Date: County: State: Community ID: Transect ID: 17 MAR 03 King Washington VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have morphological adaptations to wetlands with an *) r'.-_;....,4 ❑t__. C---; Inrfi�v+nr I r)nminnnt Plant Cnoriac StratiIm Indirator 1. Pseudotsuga menziesii T FACU 2. 3. Gaultheria shallon S FACU 4. Oemleria cerasiformis S FACU 5. Berberis nervosa S UPL 6. 7. Percent of Dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC 0% (except FAC-). Include species noted (*) as showing morphological adaptations to wetlands Describe Morphological Adaptations: Remarks: Mature second growth Douglas fir forest HYDROLOGY -Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage Aerial Photograph Other No Recorded Data Available FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Depth of Surface Water: Depth to Free Water Pit: dry Depth to Saturated Soil: none Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Inundated Saturated in upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 " Water -Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Onsite assessment during early growing season and storm events Appears to drain moderately well following seasonal storm events Field indicators of wetland hydrology NOT present Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Taxonomy (Subgroup) Entic Durochrepts Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) 0-4 4-20 Hydric Soil Indicators: Remarks: 10YR 3/2 10YR 4/4 Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor Probable Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors SAMPLE PLOT SPA2 Drainage Class: Mod. well Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type YES NO Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Rhizospheres, etc. Duff and loam Gravelly loam Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer Organic Streaking Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks) Soil appears to drain moderately well following seasonal storm events Prominent redoximorphic features NOT present Field indicators of hydric soil NOT present WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES NO Hydric Soils Present? YES NO Wetland Hydrology Present? YES NO Remarks: WETLAND CRITERIA NOT MET Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland? NO Appears to drain moderately well following seasonal storm events. NO ponding or other evidence of wetland hydrology patterns evident Mature second growth Douglas fir forest SAMPLE PLOT SPA3 Project/Site Applicant/Owner: Investigator: DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL) Rachael Ridge Habitat Technologies Date: County: State: Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? YES NO Community ID: Is the area a potential Problem area? YES NO Transect ID: 17 MAR 03 King Washington VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have morphological adaptations to wetlands with an *) r"—i-1, ❑Ian+ Cnnriac Cztrati I Inr#ra+nr I nnminant Plant SnPCiP_S Stratum indicator 1. Pseudotsuga men ziesii T FACU 2. 3. Gaultheria shallon S FACU 4. Oemleria cerasiformis S FACU 5. Berberis nervosa S UPL 6. Acer circinatum S FAC- T. 8. Percent of Dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC 0% (except FAC-). Include species noted (`) as showing morphological adaptations to wetlands Describe Morphological Adaptations: Remarks: Mature second growth Douglas fir forest HYDROLOGY Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage Aerial Photograph Other No Recorded Data Available FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Depth of Surface Water: Depth to Free Water Pit: dry Depth to Saturated Soil: none Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Inundated Saturated in upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 " Water -Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Onsite assessment during early growing season and storm events Appears to drain moderately well following seasonal storm events Field indicators of wetland hydrology NOT present Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Taxonomy (Subgroup) Entic Durochrepts Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) 0-5 10YR 3/2 5-20 10YR 4/4 Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor Probable Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Remarks: SAMPLE PLOT SPA3 Drainage Cuss: Mod. well Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type YES NO Mottle Colors Mottle (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Rhizospheres, etc. Duff and loam Gravelly loam Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer Organic Streaking Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks) Soil appears to drain moderately well following seasonal storm events Prominent redoximorphic features NOT present Field indicators of hydric soil NOT present WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES NO Hydric Soils Present? YES NO Wetland Hydrology Present? YES NO Remarks: WETLAND CRITERIA NOT MET Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland? NO Appears to drain moderately well following seasonal storm events. NO ponding or other evidence of wetland hydrology patterns evident Mature second growth Douglas fir forest SAMPLE PLOT SPZ1 Project/Site Applicant/Owner: DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL) Rachael Ridge Date: County: Investigator: Habitat Technologies State: Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? YES NO Community ID: Is the area a potential Problem area? YES NO Transect ID: 26 MAR 03 King Washington VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have morphological adaptations to wetlands with an *) ne,wninnnt Plant Snariac Stratum Inriiratnr I F]nminnnt Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Pseudotsuga menziesii T FACU 2. Co lus cornuta S FACU 3. Gaultheria shallon S FACU 4. Oemleria cerasiformis S FACU 5. Berberis nervosa S UPL 6. Acer circinatum S FAC- T. 8. Percent of Dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC 0% (except FAC-). Include species noted (*) as showing morphological adaptations to wetlands Describe Morphological Adaptations: Remarks: Edge of mature second growth Douglas fir forest HYDROLOGY Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage Aerial Photograph Other No Recorded Data Available FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Depth of Surface Water: Depth to Free Water Pit: dry Depth to Saturated Soil: None Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Inundated Saturated in upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines - Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 " Water -Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Onsite assessment during early growing season and storm events Appears to drain moderately well following seasonal storm events Field indicators of wetland hydrology NOT present •* Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Taxonomy (Subgroup) Entic Durochrepts Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) 0-7 7-20 Hydric Soil Indicators: 10YR 3/2 10YR 4/3 Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor Probable Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors SAMPLE PLOT SPZ1 Drainage Class: Mod. well Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type YES NO Mottle Texture, Concretions, Abundance/Contrast Rhizospheres, etc. Duff and loam Gravelly loam Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer Organic Streaking Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Soil appears to drain moderately well following seasonal storm events Prominent redoximorphic features NOT present Field indicators of hydric soil NOT present WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES NO Hydric Soils Present? YES NO Wetland Hydrology Present? YES NO Remarks: WETLAND CRITERIA NOT MET Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland? NO Appears to drain moderately well following seasonal storm events. NO ponding or other evidence of wetland hydrology patterns evident Edge of mature second growth Douglas fir forest GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING EVALUATION PROPOSED WYNSTONE SUBDIVISION 13.49-ACRE SITE SOUTH of the INTERSECTION of 1 Oth AVE SW and SW CAMPUS DR. FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON KING COUNTY TAX PARCEL NUMBERS: 1921049044 & 1921049030 prepared for: Mr. BRAD PLEMMONS by: BERGQUIST ENGINEERING SERVICES BES PROJECT NUMBER: 200323-REPORT 1 DECEMBER 15, 2003 Bergquist Engineering services RECEIVED JAN 0 2 2004 CITY OF FEDERAL BDILDiNQ DEPI �/4100V'�!IlII 1�A011NAA1lMA NAVY104MM 8ergquist Engineering Services 27207 8th Avenue S Des Moines, Washington 98198 PO. Box 13309 Des Moines, Washington 98198 Phone: 253.941.9399, Fax: 253,941.9499, e-mail: RBergqu5109aoI.com December 15, 2003 Mr. Brad Plemmons 101 T Street SE Auburn, Washington 98002 Re: Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Evaluation Proposed Wynstone Subdivision 13.49-Acre Site South of the Intersection of 10'h Ave. SW and SW Campus Dr. Federal Way, Washington King County Parcel numbers: 1921049044 & 1921049030 BES Project Number: 200323, Report 1 Dear Brad: Bergquist Engineering Services is pleased to provide this report of the geotechnical exploration and engineering analysis for the referenced project. The attached report summarizes project and site data, describes the services we performed, presents our findings, and provides recommendations regarding cut and constructed fill slopes and earthwork. The appendix presents site maps, test pit logs, explanatory aids, and computer printouts of the stability analyses. Based on our exploration and engineering analysis; the proposed cut and fill slopes of 2H:1 V should perform satisfactorily if the earthwork recommendation presented herein are followed. The subsurface conditions and recommendations presented should be verified during construction. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 6. 7. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................. PROJECTDESCRIPTION......................................................................................... 2 SCOPEOF SERVICES.............................................................................................. SITECHARACTERIZATION................................................................................ 2 4.1 Surface........................................................................................................... 3 4.2 Subsurface Soil and Groundwater................................................................... 3 DISCUSSION.................................. ........................................................................ 4 RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................ 4 6.1 Seismic Considerations ............ 6.2 Cut Slopes...................................................................................................... 4 6.3 Fill Slopes....................................................................................................... 6 6.4 Classification of Subsurface Soils in the Vicinity of the Proposed Wet Pond ........ 7 6.5 Earthwork......................................................................................................... 7 6.5.1 Site Clearing..................................................................................... 7 6.5.2 Excavation........................................................................................ 7 6.5.3 Materials.......................................................................................... 8 6.5.4 Placement and Compaction.............................................................. 9 6.6 Groundwater.................................................................................................. 9 6.7 Construction Observation and Testing.............................................................. 9 REPORTLIMITATIONS.........................................................................I................... 9 APPENDIX VicinityMap ............................................................................................ Al SitePlan ..................................................................I..................... A2 TestPit Logs............................................................................................................. A3 TestPit Log Notes ............ :........................................................... ................................. A8 Unified Soil ClassificationSystem................................................................................. A10 Printouts of Slope Stability Analyses .................. Notes.................................................................................................... A20 GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING EVALUATION PROPOSED WYNSTONE SUBDIVISION 13.49 ACRE SITE SOUTH of the INTERSECTION of 1 Oth AVE SW and SW CAMPUS DR. FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON ' KING COUNTY TAX PARCEL NUMBERS: 1921049044 & 1921049030 prepared for: S )ID ' Mr. BRAD PLEMMONS RV({ � t BERGQUIST ENGINEERING SERVICES BES PROJECT NUMBER: 200323-REPORT 1 ' DECEMBER 15, 2003 ,.�t>1- fir- jr ' 1.INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical exploration for the proposed Wynsto Subdivision south of the intersection of 10' Avenue SW and SW Campus Drive in Federal ' Way, Washington. The approximate location of the sites is shown on the Vicinity Map on page Al in the Appendix of this report. The geotechnical exploration was performed by Bergquist Engineering Services (BES) to provide information or recommendations regarding: 'f stability of cut and fill slopes with ecommended setbacks and • classification of the subsurface soi s for design of the stormwater management systems. ' Mr. Brad Plemmons authorized our work orally on November 26, 2003. 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 t The project involves design and site development of a 13.49-acre subdivision that will P I contain approximately 48 building lots, paved streets, and underground utilities. Several tracts within the subdivision will be set aside for pedestrian access, wetland preservation, and 1 stormwater management. W [v�,G �Jra��li4A I7I,(Llwfp� i/1L1� ' Proposed Wynstone Subdivisioi. December 15, 2003 Federal Way, Washington BES Project Number 200323-Report 1 ' Extensive cuts and fills will be required due to the amount of topographic relief on the site. The maximum depth o cut will be about 2 alon the entrance road at 10* Avenue SW ' and SW Campus Drive. Fil s up o ee is ill be required on the south third of 12' Avenue SW. According to the drawings prepared by Jaeger Engineering all cut and fill slopes ' will be constructed at two horizontal to one vertical (2H:1 V.) A wet pond will be constructed near Lot 10 between the cul-de-sac at the north end of 12 Place SW and SW Campus Drive. The wet pond will be cut into the native soils. ' 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services included a reconnaissance of the site by the geotechnical engineer, a ' review of geologic literature, logging and sampling five test pits, laboratory testing, engineering analysis, and preparation of this report. Soil samples were taken at the intervals ' noted on the individual test pit logs, which are presented in the Appendix on pages A3 through A7. Upon completion, the test pits were backfilled with the excavated site -soils. In 1 addition, existing open trench excavations immediately south of the south property line were observed by the geotechnical engineer to evaluate the subsurface soil conditions. ' The soil samples were returned to our laboratory for analysis, which included visual classification, determination of the natural moisture content of all samples, and gradation tanalysis on selected samples. The field and laboratory data were then evaluated by the geotechnical engineer relative to the proposed construction. The engineering trecommendations and advice presented in this report have been made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical-engineering practices in the area. 1 4. SITE CHARACTERIZATION The information presented in this section was gathered by BES personnel for geotechnical ' engineering purposes only. This site characterization was not intended to address the presence or likelihood of contamination on or around the site. Specialized methods and procedures, which were not a part of this scope of services, are required for an adequate environmental site assessment. ' Bergquist Engineering Services Page 2 of 10 ' Proposed Wynstone SubdivisionDecember 15, 2003 Federal Way, Washington BES Project Number 200323-Report 1 4.1 Surface At the time of our exploration, the surface of the site was covered with second growth timber. ' The average ground surface elevation ranged from a low of 288 feet along SW Campus Drive in the northeast corner to a high elevation of 376 feet near the center of the west ' property line and a high of 380 feet near the center of the east half of the south property line. More specifically, a twenty -foot high slopJasg the property line onn To-U#h side of SW ' Campus Drive is cut at a slope of aba _2_1..H_l V. The ground surface then slopes up more uniformly in a southwesterly direction to approximate elevation 384 feet within about 450 feet of the southwest corner where the ground surface slopes back down to approximate elevation 354 feet at the southwest corner. Several mounds and depressions exist within the southwest ' half of the site. 4.2 Subsurface Soil and Groundwater The subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at this site are described in the following paragraphs and are presented graphically on the test pit logs in the Appendix of this report. ' The stratification lines, indicated on the test pit logs, represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual and the transitions may not be easily tdiscernible during site excavation. In general, the site of the proposed subdivision is covered with about six to twelve inches of ' dark brown forest duff. Underlying the duff, dark brown to reddish brown, loose, GRAVEL - SAND (GP) to GRAVEL -SAND -SILT (GM) to SILT (ML) was generally encountered to a depth of two and one-half to three (2'/2 - 3) feet. The moisture content of this soil ranged from 8.1 to 16.2 percent. Underlying the 2'/2 to 3 feet of loose soil, gray brown to gray, dense to very ' dense GRAVEL -SAND (GP) to Silty SAND (SM) was encountered to the termination depth of the test pits of nine to ten feet. The moisture content of these soils ranged form 3.7 to 15.1 percent. The higher moisture contents were observed on the soils containing the higher silt content. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the test pits. Groundwater readings in granular soils, such as those encountered at this site, are generally accurate even after short periods of ' observation. Whereas, the groundwater level in fine-grained (silt and clay) soils may require several days of observation before it becomes stable and accurate. i IBergquist Engineering Services Page 3of10 Proposed Wynstone Subdivision _1 December 15, 2003 Federal Way, Washington BES Project Number 200323-Report 1 5. DISCUSSION The recommendations presented in this report are based on our understanding of the project as presented in the Project Description Section and on the assumption that the subsurface conditions encountered in the test pits adequately represent conditions near and between the exploratory test pits. Because project conditions regarding type and location of structures and earthwork profiles can change and because subsurface conditions are not always similar to those encountered in the test pits, the geotechnical engineer must be contacted for review and possible revision of the recommendations if discrepancies are noticed. 6. RECOMMENDATIONS The following sections present recommendations regarding design and construction of the significant earthwork features on this site, which include the cut slopes along the entrance off ' of SW campus Drive at 10' Avenue SW, the fill and fill slopes at the south end of 12' Avenue SW, and earthwork. 6.1 Seismic Considerations According to Figure No. 16-2 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code" (UBC), the project site is ' in Seismic Zone 3. According to Table 16-J of the UBC, the soil profile at this site is best represented by a "Soil Profile Type SD" (Stiff Soil). The site soils are not susceptible to t liquefaction and therefore exhibit minimum seismic risk. 6.2 Cut Slopes To facilitate vehicular access into the proposed subdivision from SW Campus drive, the existing ground will need to be cut down to the elevation of SW Campus Drive and sloped gently up towards the south to the site elevation. According to Jaeger Engineering, the sides of the excavation will be cut on 21-1:1 V slopes. Accordingly, the stability of 21-1:1 V cut slopes was approximated using estimated engineering properties of the subsurface soils determined by the test pits, the planned geometry of the slope, and XSTABL computer software. A uniform soil mass with a moist unit weight of 143 pcf, a cohesion value of 150 psf, and a phi angle of 38 degrees was used in the analysis along with a horizontal earthquake loading Bergquist Engineering Services Page 4 of 10 r u Proposed Wynstone Subdivision, December 15, 2003 Federal Way, Washington BES Project Number 200323-Report 1 of 0.3009. The slope stability analyses for this study were performed using XSTABL software developed by Interactive Software Designs, Inc. XSTABL performs a two dimensional limit equilibrium analysis to compute the factor of safety for a layered slope according to either: (1) General Limit Equilibrium (GLE) Method, (2) Janbu's Generalized Procedure of Slices (GPS), (3) Simplified Bishop, or (4) Simplified Janbu. XSTABL calculates a FOS (factor of safety), which is the result of dividing the total forces supporting the slope by the total forces that are tending to destabilize the slope. If the FOS is greater than 1.00, the slope is considered stable; if the FOS is less than 1.00, the slope is considered unstable. A FOS of 1 .00 indicates the slope is in perfect equilibrium. Because of the uncertainty regarding pertinent soil parameters used in the analyses and the variability of soil, slope, and ground water conditions, a seismic FOS greater than 1 .25 is generally acceptable for residential construction. The program was instructed to calculate the FOS for 1600 potential shear surfaces during each iteration using the Simplified Bishop method. The graphs presented in the Appendix show the locations of the five weakest surfaces analyzed within the slope segment selected for analysis, with the surface having the lowest FOS highlighted. Note that the most critical failure arc intercepts the ground surface at 112.38 feet on the X-axis. The crest of the slope is at 105.00 feet on the X-axis. Therefore, the failure arc, with a factor of safety of 1.459, occurs about 7.5 feet back from the crest of the slope. �. ' L I� r�r �� S ii',l '� -tue ° CVl The stability of the slope was then estimated with an eight -foot deep trench (crack) full of water to simulate a utility trench installed parallel to the crest of the slope. XSTABL automatically puts the trench at the location of the most critical failure arc. The lowest safety factor for this situation during a 0.300g earthquake event is estimated to be 1.263 as shown on pages Al and Al 8 in the Appendix of this report. The location of this failure arc is estimated to be 3.23 (108.25' — 105.00') feet from the crest of the slope. bA I J � a, k Accordingly, based on these analyses, a minimum I0-foot wide buffer from the crest of the lt`rvrfS11 slope is recommended. The ground surface at the top of the slopes stripped of the loose SILT 5 � (ML) soils where they are encountered and the loose GRAVEL -SAND (GP) soils should be either stripped or compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum density as determined by ASTM D1557. The ground surface near the crest of the slope should be sloped slightly away from the crest. a ce of the slopes should be properly vegetate plants that have deep-seated Bergquist Engineering Services Page 5 of 10 I Proposed Wynstone Subdivision December 15, 2003 Federal Way, Washington BES Project Number 200323-Report 1 roots to stabilize the ground surface and prevent erosion. No water from any source such as roof or footing drains should be permitted to discharge on or run over the slope. 6.3 Fill Slopes It is anticipated that the fill slopes will be constructed from the coarse -grained GP and SP soils excavated from the cuts on the site. If these soils are compacted in loose lifts not exceeding 12 inches in thickness, and if each lift is compacted within two percent of optimum moisture content to at least 95 percent of the maximum laboratory density as determined by ASTM D1557, the shear strength should be nearly equivalent to the native coarse -grained soils. Therefore, the safety factors at the proposed 2H:1 V slopes will be similar to those estimated for the cut slopes. e buffer and set ac recommendations for the fill slopes are, therefore, the same as far fhe cut slopes. �W Prior to placement of fill strip and remove any tree stumps, weeds, and other deleterious materials from the project area prior such as the dark brown forest duff, the dark brown to reddish brown, loose GRAVEL -SAND (GP), and loose GRAVEL -SAND -SILT (GM). After site 1P�� clearing, the exposed surface should be graded relatively flat to allow for proper subgrade &16 preparation but sloped slightly to allow good surface drainage during construction. Fill slopes should be over -built beyond their planned geometry and cut back to the desired geometry in order to achieve a dense soil mass throughout the cross-section of the fill. Forest duff and fine-grained, ML and OL soils from the site are not suitable for use as structural fill or embankment fill on this project. Coarse -grained GP and SM soils from the site are suitable for use as structural fill and embankment fill. The soils contain occasional cobbles and boulders in excess of six inches in dimension. In addition, some boulders in excess of three feet across were observed and should be expected within the subsurface soils. Cobbles and boulders in excess of six inches in diameter should be removed from the borrow soils prior to placement and compaction. The native, dense to very dense, GP and GM soils beneath the forest duff, ML, and OL soils in the south end of the site have sufficient allowable bearing capacity to support the proposed structural fill. Prior to placement of structural fill, the upper two to three feet of loose must be removed and exported off site or stockpiled for use in landscape areas only. The organic -rich and silt -rich soils should not be used as structural fill. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 6 of 10 IProposed Wynstone Subdivision December 15, 2003 Federal Way, Washington BES Project Number 200323-Report 1 The face of fill slopes should be vegetated with plants that have deep-seated roots to stabilize ' the ground surface and prevent erosion. No water from any source such as roof or footing drains should be permitted to discharge on or run over the fill slopes. 1 6.4 Classification of Subsurface Soils in the Vicinity of the Proposed Wet Pond A wet pond will be constructed on Lot 10 near the northeast corner of the proposed subdivision. According the results of Test Pit 4, the subsurface soils classify as loose, fine- grained SILT (ML) to a depth of two and one-half feet. Underlying the ML soils, dense to very ' dense, GRAVEL -SAND (GP) some silt, occasional cobble was encountered to the termination depth of the test pit of 10 feet. The soils are estimated to be highly permeable, therefore, the ' pond will likely need to be lined. ' 6.5 Earthwork The recommendations presented in this report are predicated on fulfillment of the following earthwork recommendations. 1 6.5.1 Site Clearing: Strip and remove any tree stumps, weeds, and other deleterious ' materials from the project area prior to construction. After site clearing, the exposed surface should be graded relatively flat to allow for proper subgrade preparation but sloped slightly ' to allow good surface drainage during construction. 6.5.2 Excavation: Conventional -excavating equipment should be suitable for the proposed shallow foundation excavations. Deeper excavations may require a more powerful, trackhoe- type excavator for improved production. According to Chapter 296-155, Part N of the Safety Standards for Construction Work in the State of Washington, the site soils classify as Type C. Therefore, side slopes of temporary excavations deeper than four (4) feet should be no steeper than one and one-half (1 .5) horizontal to one (1) vertical (1 .5H:1 V). If the dimensions of the site prevent the use of ' maximum slopes of 1.5H:1 V, the slopes must be stabilized or shored to facilitate safe excavations. The geotechnical engineer should be contacted for additional trecommendations if such techniques are going to be employed. IBergquist Engineering Services Page 7 of 10 Proposed Wynstone Subdivision December 15, 2003 Federal Way, Washington BES Project Number 200323-Report 1 6.5.3 Materials: The on -site SILT (ML) and Sandy SILT (ML) soils are moisture sensitive and may be difficult to work during wet weather conditions. Therefore, in general, we recommend that they be used as structural fill or backfill only during the dry season. If additional soil is need for structural fill or backfill to meet design grades, it should be imported and conform to the gradation presented in Table 6.1, and be approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to use. Samples must be submitted to the geotechnical engineer at least 72 hours before approval is required and before the materials are used. Gravel base and select materials for pavement subgrade should conform to local governmental standards, such as City of Federal Way, King County, or other suitable specifications approved by the geotechnical engineer. TABLE 6.1 GRADATION REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL FILL 3-inch 100 3/4-inch 50-100 No. 4 25-65 No. 10 10-50 No. 40 0-20 No. 200 L 0-5* *Note: The percent passing the No. 200 sieve is based on the weight of the material passing the 3/4-inch sieve. If construction is performed during the wet season, a granular base or work blanket may be required. Granular materials used as a work blanket should conform to the gradation presented in Table 6.2, and be approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to use. TABLE 6.2 GRADATION REQUIREMENTS FOR WORK BLANKET *Note: The percent passing the No. 200 sieve is based on the weight of the material passing the 3/4-inch sieve. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 8 of 10 Proposed Wynstone Subdivision December 15, 2003 Federal Way, Washington BES Project Number 200323-Report 1 6.5.4 Placement and Compaction: Structural fill and structural backfill should be placed in relatively horizontal loose lifts not exceeding ten (12) inches in thickness and compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor (ASTM 1557) maximum density at moisture contents within two (2) percent of optimum. Structural fill/backfill should be placed under the full-time observation of a representative of the geotechnical engineer, and the specified compacted density and moisture content of each lift should be verified by test, prior to placement of subsequent lifts. Placement on frozen ground should not be attempted. ' 6.6 Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in any of the test pits at this site. Therefore, groundwater will not be an issue for this project. 6.7 Construction Observation and Testing The recommendations presented in this report rely on adequate observation and testing of construction materials and procedures by the geotechnical engineer or his qualified ' representative. At a minimum, the testing program should include: Observation and review of site clearing and review of all excavations to evaluate ' whether actual conditions are consistent with those encountered during ' exploration. Observation and testing of placement and compaction of all fill and backfill ' materials to evaluate compliance with specifications. 7. REPORT LIMITATIONS The recommendations presented in this report are for the exclusive use of Mr. Brad Plemmons ' for the proposed subdivision to be constructed on King County Tax Lot Numbers 1921049044 and 1921049030 in Federal Way, Washington. The recommendations are based on the subsurface information obtained by Bergquist Engineering Services (BES) and on ' design details provided by Mr. Jim Jaeger of Jaeger Engineering. If there are any revisions to Bergquist Engineering Services Page 9 of 10 Proposed Wynstone Subdivision Federal Way, Washington December 15, 2003 BES Project Number 200323-Report 1 the plans or if deviations from the subsurface conditions noted in this report are encountered during construction, BES should be notified immediately to determine whether changes to the recommendations are required. After the plans and specifications are more complete, the geotechnical engineer should be provided the opportunity to review them to check that these engineering recommendations have been interpreted properly. .�. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 10 of 10 0 Z W a a Q Project Name: Proposed Wynstone Subduivision Location: Fe7e—roT Way, Washington Date: December 2003 VICINITY MAP Bergquist Engineering Services For: Mr. Brad Plemmons BES Project Number: 200323-1 Al Log of Test Pit 1 Project. Wynstone Development Excavation Rig: Caterpillar 416C Back -hoe Location: Federal Way, Washington Excavated By: Larry BES Project No.: 200323-1 Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, P.E. Date Excavated: December 2, 2003 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 352' S w r::...-� .. .-sr:.4'.:. ''- �".}..r':i5-6Ft^F.1.'�"�•� ,J ._.4ny.�•.fi:'.Lf���_R' �.. :)i�' ��- _�Q" _ �.�' _ [Ya�-~,*5,"rSEj�,Sl �' ..-✓5�--� �''F��..• �� �•3- �' 5:.�°".: �-�� - `*�x�. !- ... - �s�. ".SS �''y' Y�' y=`::���' �-1: •c,T� _'y.a'J,i�T -j ti' �".>;aYY• a#YJ - ' i., •�'_t � � �� _ r. .�"ti dr„y;�� sf' 6' �,.. �Li«?� -� ..-},.. .n.;Y- - .�a`-Eis..:?.• ."V:•�r Fri• �'i" ht•' � 54"� _ . 1.'�.'. ..1... :"J.;,+.'... Dark brown Forest Duff i--------------------------------------------------- _�- 2 _2 BSI GM 16.2 Dark brown to reddish brown, loose, GRAVEL -SAND -SILT 3--------------------------------------------------�,3 —4— — 4 — BS2 SM 12.6 5 Gray -brown, dense to very dense, Silty -SAND, with gravel, v5_ occasional cobble (Difficult digging at 5.5 feet) 6 _6 - -------------------------- 7 GP -- Gray -brown, very dense,GRAVEL, with sand, with cobbles —7— ------------------------------------------------------- 8 Gray -brown, dense to very dense, GRAVEL -SAND, some silt, _8_ — — occasional cobble 9 BS3 GP 8.6 9 End of Test Pit. Dry at Completion. 10 _10_ 11 _11 Fix Log of Test Pit 2 Project: Wynstone Development Excavation Rig: Caterpillar 416C Back -hoe Location: Federal Way, Washington Excavated By: Larry BES Project No.: 200323-1 Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, P.E. Date Excavated: December 2, 2003 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 363' c m a s vi p m e E y r u Description and Classification m N E~ N V a Z Dark brown Forest Duff 1 -----------------------------------------------------1-- 2 - _ BSI GP 8.1 Dark brown to reddish brown, loose, GRAVEL -SAND -2- 3 ---------------------------------------------------3 Brown to gray -brown, very dense, GRAVEL -SAND, some silt, _4 -4- BS2 GP 8.0 occasional cobble 5 --------------------------------------------------- 5 Sieve Size °6 Passing 6- #4 66 -6- BS3 SM 15.1 #10 41 7 #700 23 -7_ #200 13 8 -$- Gray-brown, very dense, Silty SAND, with gravel, occasional 9 cobble _9 10 BS4 SM 10.1 10 11 End of Test Pit. Dry at Completion. _ll_ A4 Log of Test Pit 3 Project: Wynstone Development Excavation Rig: Caterpillar 416C Back -hoe Location: Federal Way, Washington Excavated By: Larry BES Project No.: 200323-1 Logged By: R. A- Bergquist, P.E. Date Excavated: December 2, 2003 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 363' ' �-.:n,j. - _ .. _ - •�.-"IL�"e.1: �P' '?1''� i'i'j',�:.j.5. _ . ,ay ill-' ��Ql y— ' ''w S`'.� . '-•+F•'�' .T •.. � " •..?U : -irk . c7 Desoi N eS, .I. ...�,t '-,��;�, m . err:• ;�..,..`r Dark brown Forest Duff ----- —2 Dark brown to reddish brown, loose, GRAVEL -SAND 2— — BSI GP 11.6 -. -----------------------------------------------------3_ 3 -A— BS2 GP 8.9 --4— 5 —5— 6_ —6— Gray-brown to gray, very dense, GRAVEL -SAND, trace silt, 7— occasional cobble —7 BS3 GP 6.6 8 _8 9 _9 10 10 End of Test Pit. Dry at Completion. it _11 A5 Log of Test Pit 4 Project: Wynstone Development Excavation Rig: Caterpillar 416C Back -hoe Location: Federal Way, Washington Excavated By: Larry BES Project No.: 200323-1 Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, P.E. Date Excavated: December 2, 2003 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 308' c C s E m t �? E , c Description and Classification 0 m �° E~n 00 o Z OL - Reddish -brown, loose Organic SILT with sand - _ _ - _ - - - - - - - - BS1 ML 12.3 Reddish brown, loose, SILT, aome sand, occasional gravel 2 -3- BS2 GP 4.6 -------------------------------------- 3 Gray -brown, dense to very dense, GRAVEL -SAND, some silt, - occasional cobble 4 4 ---------------------------------------------------�_ 5 _5 Gray -brown, dense to very dense, GRAVEL -SAND, trace silt, 6 occasional cobble _6 7 _7 Sieve Size % Passing g #4 34 _8_ - - BS3 GP 3.7 010 12 q #100 6 _9 #200 5 10 10 End of Test Pit. Dry at Completion. 11 _11_ A6 Log of Test Pit 5 Project: Wynstone Development Excavation Rig: Caterpillar 416C Back -hoe Location: Federal Way, Washington Excavated By: Larry BES Project No.: 200323-1 Logged By:'R. A.Bergquist, P.E. A7 11 TEST PIT LOG NOTES These notes and test pit logs are intended for use with this geotechnical report for the purposes and project described therein. The test pit logs depict BES's interpretation of subsurface conditions at the. location of the test pit on the date noted. Subsurface conditions may vary, and groundwater levels may change because of seasonal or numerous other factors. Accordingly, the test pit logs should not be made a part of construction plans or be used to define construction conditions. The approximate locations of the test pits are shown on the Site Plan. The test pits were located in the field by estimating distances from existing site features. "Sample Type" refers to the sampling method and equipment used during exploration where: "BS" indicates a bulk sample taken from the ground surface or from the backhoe bucket. "Moisture Content" refers to the moisture content of the soil expressed in percent by weight as determined in the laboratory. "Description and Classification" refer to the materials encountered in the test pit. The descriptions and classifications are generally based on visual examination in the field and laboratory. Where noted, laboratory tests were performed to determine the soil classification. The terms and symbols used in the test pit logs are in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. laboratory tests are performed in general accordance with applicable procedures described by the American Society for Testing and Materials. " Indicates location of groundwater at the time noticed. Indicates location of seepage of water and the time noticed. TERMS for RELATIVE DENSITY of NON -COHESIVE SOIL Term Standard Penetration Resistance "N" Very Loose 4 or less Loose 5 to 10 Medium Dense 11 to 30 Dense 31 to 50 Very Dense Over 50 blows/foot 03 TEST PIT LOG NOTES continued TERMS for RELATIVE CONSISTENCY of COHESIVE SOIL Term Unconfined Compressive Stren th Very Soft 0 to 0.25 tons/square-foot Soft 0.25 to 0.50 tsf Medium Stiff 0.50 to 1.00 tsf Stiff 1.00 to 2.00 tsf Very Stiff 2.00 to 4.00 tsf Hard Over 4.00 tsf DEFINITION of MATERIAL by DIAMETER of PARTICLE Boulder 8-inches+ Cobble 3 to 8 inches Gravel 3 inches to 5mm Coarse Sand 5mm to 0.6mm Medium Sand 0.6mm to 0.2mm Fine Sand 0.2mm to 0.074mm Silt 0.074 to 0.005mm Clay less than 0.005mm A9 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) COARSE GRAINED SOILS (Less than 50%fines. Fines are soils passing the # 200 sieve.) GROUP SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS GW Well -graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL -SAND mixtures, less than 5% fines. P rl ded GRAVELS or GRAVEL -SAND mixtures GP oo y gra I GRAVELS less than 5% fines. More than half of coarse fraction is larger Silty GRAVELS, GRAVEL- SAND -SILT mixtures, more than No. 4 sieve. GM than 12% fines. GC Clayey GRAVELS, GRAVEL- SAND -CLAY mixtures, more than 12% fines. _ SW Well -graded SANDS orGrovetly SANDS mixtures, less than 5% fines. Poorly graded SANDS or Gravelly SANDS mixtures, SP less than 5% fines. SANDS M Silty SANDS, SAND -SILT mixtures, more than 12% ore half of coarse fraction is smaller than SM than No. 4 sieve. fines. SC Clayey SANDS, SAND -CLAY mixtures, more than 12% fines Note: Coarse -grained soils receive dual symbols if they contain between 5 and 12 percent fines. FINE-GRAINED SOILS (More than 50%fines. Fines are materials passing the # 200 sieve) GROUP SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS ML Inorganic SILTS, very fine SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, Silty or Clayey SANDS Inorganic CLAYS of low to medium plasticity, SILTS and CLAYS CL Gravelly CLAYS, Sandy CLAYS, Silty CLAYS, Lean Liquid limit less than 50 CLAYS OL Organic SILTS, or organic Silty CLAYS of low —r—plasticity MH Inorganic SILTS, Micaceous or Diatomaceous fine 1 SANDS or SILTS, Elastic SILTS SILTS and CLAYS CH Inorganic CLAYS of high plasticity, fat CLAYS Liquid limit greater than 50 ' OH Organic CLAYS of medium to high plasticity PT PEAT, MUCK, and other highly organic soils Highly organic soils Note: Fine-grained soils receive dual symbols if their limits plot left of the "A" Line and have a plasticity index (PI) of 4 to 7 percent. ' UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM I Bergquist Engineering Services A10 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ., N N Z 3 LO 0 11 n 0 Ln m E E ^^� Z CL S._ O (/} t� O +- U C O E Q N O — O O > U N } O U O N .,_ O E O O O O O O 0 to N O 00 to r� r� M M N N (+aa j) slxv—J, 0 O N r N 0+ All XSTABL File: WYN218 12-10-03 17:30 * X S T A B L * * Slope Stability Analysis * using the * Method of Slices * * * Copyright (C) 1992 - 99 * Interactive Software Designs, Inc. * Moscow, ID 83843, U.S.A. * * All Rights Reserved * * Ver. 5.204 96 - 1760 ****************************************** Problem Description : Wynstone Development for Plemmons ----------------------------- SEGMENT BOUNDARY COORDINATES ----------------------------- 4 SURFACE boundary segments ' Segment x-left y-left x-right y-right Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment 1 1 40.0 311.0 75.0 311.0 2 75.0 311.0 105.0 326.0 1 3 105.0 326.0 123.0 326.0 1 ' 4 123.0 326.0 143.0 326.0 1 - ^ ISOTROPIC Soil Parameters -- 1 Soil unit(s) specified P Soil Unit Weight Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Water Unit Moist Sat. Intercept Angle Parameter Constant Surface No. (pcf ) (pcf ) (psf ) (deg) Ru (psf ) No. ' 1 143.0 144.6 150.0 38.00 .000 .0 0 A horizontal earthquake loading coefficient of .300 has been assigned A vertical earthquake loading coefficient of .000 has been assigned Al2 A critical failure surface searching method, using a random technique for generating CIRCULAR surfaces has been specified. 1600 trial surfaces will be generated and analyzed. 40 Surfaces initiate from each of 40 points equally spaced along the ground surface between x = 45.0 ft and x = 75.0 ft Each surface terminates between x = 105.0 ft and x = 120.0 ft Unless further limitations were imposed, the minimum elevation at which a surface extends is y = .0 ft * * * * * DEFAULT SEGMENT LENGTH SELECTED BY XSTABL * * * * * 2.0 ft line segments define each trial failure surface. --------------------- ANGULAR RESTRICTIONS --------------------- The first segment of each failure surface will be inclined within the angular range defined by : Lower angular limit -45.0 degrees Upper angular limit (slope angle - 5.0) degrees 1 ************************************************************************ L -- WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING -- (# 48) ************************************************************************ Negative effective stresses were calculated at the base of a slice. 1 This warning is usually reported for cases where slices have low self weight and a relatively high "c" shear strength parameter. In such cases, this effect can only be eliminated by reducing the "c" value. ************************************************************************ _------------_----------------------------------------------------- USER SELECTED option to maintain strength greater than zero L------_------__---------------------------------------------- ' Factors of safety have been calculated by the * * * * * SIMPLIFIED BISHOPMAETHOD * * * * * A13 I The most critical circular failure surface is specified by 22 coordinate points Point x-surf y-surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 75.00 311.00 2 76.99 310.84 3 78.99 310.76 4 80.99 310.78 5 82.99 310.90 6 84.98 311.10 7 86.96 311.40 8 88.92 311.79 9 90.86 312.28 10 92.77 312.85 11 94.66 313.51 12 96.52 314.25 13 98.34 315.09 14 100.11 316.00 15 101.85 317.00 16 103.53 318.08 17 105.17 319.23 18 106.74 320.46 19 108.26 321.76 20 109.72 323.13 21 111.11 324.57 22 112.38 326.00 **** Simplified BISHOP FOS = 1.459 **** The following is a summary of the TEN most critical surfaces Problem Description : Wynstone Development for Plemmons FOS Circle Center Radius Initial Terminal Resisting (BISHOP) x-coord y-coord x-coord x-coord Moment (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft-lb) 1_ 1.459 79.54 353.76 43.00 75.00 112.38 1.058E+06 2. 1.468 79.19 353.27 42.66 73.46 111.98 1.053E+06 3. 1.476 78.68 356.60 46.00 72.69 113.00 1.182E+06 4. 1.478 78.76 350.20 39.80 71.92 110.34 9.365E+05 5. 1.481 80.71 341.93 31.45 75.00 107.82 6.668E+05 6. 1.483 80.89 345.57 35.36 73.46 110.34 8.916E+05 7. 1.485 80.74 355.29 44.77 74.23 114.57 1.288E+06 8. 1.485 81.09 345.72 35.55 73.46 110.65 9.178E+05 9. 1.488 75.00 376.87 65.87 75.00 116.83 1.732E+06 10. 1.491 81.50 341.04 30.73 75.00 108.29 6.997E+05 * * * ENI*,16F FILE * * * A14 M 0 c0 N I I O in N 0 I n 0 r O (/)/� O (/ ) m T- � r� O E N � E Z co N x � Q O V I am x +- U O N c0 E Q N O — N O > .0 N -- O O U O N } O N C C— _ O >. 0 N ------------------- �—r O ON O 00 w M M (1199j) SIX V -J, A15 XSTABL File: WYNC8110 12-10-03 18:02 * X S T A B L * * Slope Stability Analysis * using the * Method of Slices * * * Copyright (C) 1992 - 99 * Interactive Software Designs, Inc. * Moscow, ID 83843, U.S.A. * * * All Rights Reserved * * Ver. 5.204 96 - 1760 ****************************************** Problem Description : Wynstone Development for Plemmons ----------------------------- SEGMENT BOUNDARYCOORDINATES - 4 SURFACE boundary segments ' Segment x-left y-left x-right y-right Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment ' 1 40.0 311.0 75.0 311.0 1 2 75.0 311.0 105.0 326.0 1 3 105.0 326.0 123.0 326.0 1 4 123.0 326.0 143.0 326.0 1 Cl ----------------------------------- A CRACKED ZONE HAS BEEN SPECIFIED ----------------------------------- Depth of crack below ground surface = 8.00 (feet) Maximum depth of water in crack = 8.00 (feet) Unit weight of water in crack = 62.40 (pcf) Failure surfaces will have a vertical side equal to the specified depth of crack and be affected by a hydrostatic force according to the specified depth of water in the crack -------------------------- ISOTROPIC Soil Parameters -------------------------- 1 Soil unit (s) specified Alb I Soil Unit Weight Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Unit Moist Sat. Intercept Angle Parameter Constant No. (pcf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) Ru (psf) 1 143.0 144.6 150.0 38.00 .000 .0 A horizontal earthquake loading coefficient of .300 has been assigned A vertical earthquake loading coefficient of .000 has been assigned water Surface No. A critical failure surface searching method, using a random technique for generating CIRCULAR surfaces has been specified. 1600 trial surfaces will be generated and analyzed. 40 Surfaces initiate from each of 40 points equally spaced along the ground surface between x = 45.0 ft and x = 75.0 ft Each surface terminates between x = 105.0 ft and x = 110.0 ft Unless further limitations were imposed, the minimum elevation at which a surface extends is y = .0 ft * * * * * DEFAULT SEGMENT LENGTH SELECTED BY XSTABL * * * * * 2.0 ft line segments define each trial failure surface. --------------------- --------------------- ANGULAR RESTRICTIONS The first segment of each failure surface will be inclined within the angular range defined by : Lower angular limit -45.0 degrees Upper angular limit (slope angle - 5.0) degrees A ************************************************************************ WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING -- (# 48) Negative effective stresses were calculated at the base of a slice. This warning is usually reported for cases where slices have low self weight and a relatively high "c" shear strength parameter. In such cases, this effect can only be eliminated by reducing the "c" value. ************************************************************************ - USER SELECTED option to maintain strengthgreater than zero ------------------------------------------------------------ Factors of safety have been calculated by the : * * * * * SIMPLIFIED BISHOP METHOD The most critical circular failure surface is specified by 20 coordinate points Point x-surf y-surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 75.00 311.00 2 77.00 310.94 3 79.00 310.97 4 80.99 311.11 5 82.98 311.35 6 84.95 311.69 7 86.90 312.13 8 88.83 312.67 9 90.72 313.31 10 92.58 314.04 11 94.41 314.87 12 96.18 315.78 13 97.91 316.79 14 99.59 317.88 15 101.21 319.06 16 102.76 320.31 17 104.25 321.65 18 105.67 323.05 19 107.02 324.53 20 108.23 326.00 **** Simplified BISHOP FOS = 1.263 **** The following is a summary of the TEN most critical surfaces Problem Description : Wynstone Development for Plemmons FOS Circle Center Radius Initial Terminal Resisting (BISHOP) x-coord y-coord x-coord x-coordA17 Moment (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) A18 (ft-lb) 1. 1.263 77.26 350.31 39.37 75.00 108.23 6.944E+05 2. 1.345 67.69 370.76 60.21 75.00 107.94 7.910E+05 3. 1.356 53.50 407.74 99.10 75.00 109.52 1.217E+06 4. 1.360 78.61 347.46 36.72 74.23 108.38 7.182E+05 5. 1.362 74.20 359.93 48.94 75.00 109.45 8.478E+05 6. 1.364 51.68 411.66 103.33 75.00 109.46 1.242E+06 7. 1.365 77.22 353.46 42.51 75.00 109.66 8.266E+05 8. 1.365 72.94 363.89 52.93 75.00 109.88 9.098E+05 9. 1.374 80.61 340.82 30.35 75.00 107.08 6.081E+05 10. 1.375 74.14 354.31 43.32 75.00 106.92 6.310E+05 * * * END OF FILE * * * A19 I I I 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 1 2 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................... .............................................................. 2 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES.............................................................................................. 2 4. .......................................................................... SITE CHARACTERIZATION ......••.... 3 4.1 Surface........................................................................................................... 4.2 Subsurface Soil and Groundwater...................................................•...--..••• 4 5. DISCUSSION ............................... ........................................................................... 4 6. RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................ 4 6.1 Seismic Considerations................................................................................... 6.2 Cut Slopes 4 ...................................................................................................... 6.3 Fill Slopes 6 ....................................................................................................... 6.4 Classification of Subsurface Soils in the Vicinity of the Proposed Wet Pond ........ 7 7 6.5 Earthwork ................................................... 6.5.1 Site Clearing..................................................................................... 6.5.2 Excavation............................................................................ 7 6.5.3 Materials.......................................................................................... 8 6.5.4 Placement and Compaction............................................................. 9 6.6 Groundwater ............................ ................... 9 ................................................... 6.7 Construction Observation and Testing ..-... - .... 9 7. REPORT LIMITATIONS............................................................................................. 9 APPENDIX Vicinity Map Site Plan TestPit Logs.......................................................... TestPit Log Notes......................................................................................................... Unified Soil Classification System Printouts of Slope Stability Analyses...... ................... .................................................... Al A2 A3 A8 A10 All Notes............................................................................................ A19 GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING EVALUATION PROPOSED WYNSTONE SUBDIVISION 13.49-ACRE SITE SOUTH of the INTERSECTION of 1 Oth AVE SW and SW CAMPUS DR. FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON KING COUNTY TAX PARCEL NUMBERS: 1921049044 & 1921049030 prepared for: Mr. BRAD PLEMMONS by; BERGQUIST ENGINEERING SERVICES BES PROJECT NUMBER: 200323-REPORT 1 DECEMBER 15, 2003 �iArl„An dry ���,!�^^rigl�' R^�1�11141! Bergquist Engineering services Christopher Brown 0 Amociatea 9688 rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 WYNSTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for a 44-Lot Single Family & 19-Unit Multi -Family Residential Development in the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY King County March 31, 2004 Traffic Engineers & Transportation Planners if RESUBMITTED APR 3 0 2004 WYNSTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Table of Contents Introduction 1. Location 3. Scope and Access 3. Possible Plat Name Change 4. Analysis Criteria 4. Adjacent Land Uses 4. Transit 6. Phasing 6. Traffic Characteristics 6. Street System 8. Horizon Year Volumes without Project 8. Trip Generation 10. Trip Distribution & Assignment 12. Year 2006 Horizon Year Traffic 13. Capacity Analysis 16. LOS Footnotes 17. Access Street Design Considerations 17. Traffic Hazard 18. Mitigation Fees 19. Diverted Traffic to SW 339th Place 20. Conclusions 21. List of Figures 1. Vicinity Map 2. 2. Wynstone Preliminary Plat Plan 5. 3 Current (2003) Traffic Volumes 7. 4. 2006 Baseline Traffic Volumes 9. 5. Adjacent Project's Peak Hour Traffic Data 11, 6. Traffic Assignment, Plemmon's Plateau & Wynstone 14. 7. 2006 Horizon Year Forecast with Projects 15. List of Tables I Trip Generation, Wynstone & Plemmons Plateau 10. II Trip Generation for Adjacent Developments 12. III 2010 Employment Distribution 13. IV Levels of Service & Average Delay 16. V Control Chart Analysis 19. Appendix Christopher Brown 0 Amociate8 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 WYNSTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for a 44-Lot Single Family & 19-Unit Multi -Family Residential Development in the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY King County Introduction Briefly, the purpose of this study is to obtain current traffic volume data on the adjacent local access and arterial street system within the City of Federal Way for a proposed 44- lot single family and a potential, adjacent 19-unit multi -family residential development, both located on a parcel of land situated in the western sector of the City of Federal Way, King County; and to derive a year 2006 forecast for future traffic conditions so that an assessment of potential traffic impacts can be made. For reference, the general location of the site is shown on Figure 1, the Yiciniiy Mai. The study includes the gathering of local collector and arterial street intersection traffic data on the network that will be impacted by ten or more p.m. peak hour trips. The analysis covers the p.m. peak hour traffic operations since that contains the highest hourly traffic volumes of the average weekday. It then continues with an estimate of the trip distribution and traffic assignment. The latter is based on the projected year 2010 employment within a 20-mile radius of the site. An adjustment to that distribution was also carried out after a meeting with the city's traffic analyst to account for travel into Seattle via SR 509. Of special interest in this assessment is that there are three adjacent projects of record whose traffic is to be included in this assessment. These are the plats of Orchid Lane at 50 s-f units, Lake Haven Estates at 13 single family (s-f) units, and the Pena Subdivision at 7 s-f units. In addition, since the developer is also proposing a 19-unit m-f development adjacent to the subject plat, traffic from this project is also included. The name for this m-f development is Plemmon's Plateau. Christopher Brown 0 Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 �`,. .QEGIrflf�• •1�•,i ��Y ...�e.:3:8iir .,.. FIGURE I Vicinity Map -2- izs - 'I I� e �a zr � rl �-I { x: y Chri8topher Brown 0 A&Bociatea 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 Projects excluded from this analysis, by city request, are the plats of Tuscany at 22 s-f units and Cottages West, an 82 unit senior housing development. Their traffic is essentially considered to be a part of the background traffic growth. It may be noted that the highway and arterial street traffic volume data over the p.m. peak hour is the typical design hour for traffic impact assessments. Except at the intersections of Enchanted Parkway S. on S 34e Street and at 21't Avenue SW at SW 356n' Street whose data was obtained in the field by the consultant, all data was from the City of Federal Way public works files. The city's traffic analyst provided the background traffic growth rate of 2.5 percent per year. The developer provided the horizon year of full occupancy as 2006. The latter is based on the estimated rate of construction and time of sales and full occupancy. The application of the local rate of growth for background traffic data is in accordance with the recommended practice of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Tra c Access and Impact Studies for Site Development, Transportation Engineering, August 1988. The study assigns future site generated traffic to the street network and continues with an analysis of current levels of service (LOS) on the arterial street system and concludes the study by identifying the future levels of service (LOS) both without and with full project completion including the adjacent 19-unit multi -family development ofPlemmon's Plateau. The 2006 horizon year traffic volumes, in concert with the background growth rate and the adjacent projects of record, including the m-f development ofPlemmon's Plateau, are used to assess the potential project's direct traffic impacts. Location The location of the proposed 44-lot subdivision, Wynstone, and the adjacent 19-unit multi -family development of Plemmon's Plateau are imcnediately south of Campus Drive and opposite I& Avenue SW. It is shown on Figure 1, as noted earlier. The City of Federal Way's Saghalie Park is on the projects western boundary and to the southwest of the park is the Saghalie Junior High School. Scope and Access For the purpose of this study, the scope of work considers the 44-lot single family style residential development, Wynstone, and the adjacent 19-unit, multi -family development of Plemmon's Plateau situated on a parcel of land located on the southward extension of -3- Christopher Brown (?% Associates 9688 rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (2�06) 722-1910 fax (2,06) 7Z24909 loth Avenue SW from SW Campus Drive and along a new linkage to the east, SW 339th Place, where it connects to Saghalie Park and also continues to the southeast where a connection to 12`h Avenue SW is proposed in the near future. The site plan and this local access street network are shown on Figure 2. The southward extension of the 10th Avenue SW/12n' Avenue SW linkage will be constructed from the junction of le Avenue SW/SW Campus Drive and past the proposed SW 339m Place. It should be noted that this new linkage to the south — 12th Avenue SW — mould provide a new access route to the adjacent plat of Orchid Lame. In addition, the linkage to the west via SW 3390'Place will also provide a new direct access to the city's park and to the adjacent Saghalie Junior High School. In this analysis it will be seen that the main access is via the signalized intersection of 10a' Avenue SW and SW Campus Drive with a secondary access to the south and southwest via. 12th Avenue SW through the recently completed street network of Orchid Lane, the adjacent single family residential plat located immediately south. Traffic using these access points is described later on Figure 6. An:iNsis Criteria The traffic analysis considers this single family detached residential housing development as conforming to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) TriP Generation Manual, Oh edition, Land Use Code 210 and, for the adjacent multi -family development of Plemmon's Plateau, under Land Use Code 220, apartments. The fundamental intersections within the city expected to be impacted by ten or more of the site's p.m. peak hour generated traffic are all located along the SW Campus Drive/S. 348th Street Corridor from Enchanted Parkway/16th Avenue S. and the SW 350h Street Corridor to Pacific Highway S. These intersections are shown on the following schematic traffic diagrams and described later in the table showing current and future levels of service. Adiacent Land Uses The adjacent land uses, in addition to the previously described new residential plats of Orchid lane, Lake Haven Estates, and the Pena Subdivision are the city's Saghalie Park me Christopher Brown CAS Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. SC4cattic, WA 98118-5981 (Z06) 'Z'ZZ-1910 Fax ('Z06) TLZ-1909 rIg 4 ►--— � Ai i 1 r 1 ' w • � � 1 /i ' M � � / ti r i� I74�v� -mil" ./ r �' �,. '`•S _... �_� ..__... �,,-~"i a~ �i'� r ;;�' r a yr ' � •� lit 'M - 1 1 IF ATnygMrl J rr FIGURE 2 t1l2i3l � jf� 7r tO �q m r u. t r..1•5 M Nrt at~r,,n Wynstone Preliminary Plat Plan -5- �I I`iy 'I IIII u E� Yr N y •t_'•r' N 4 w> MNC PRf MINAkr PLAT PLAN 17V, AN %V A Sy' .LWM SI c'� F 1 •� �C� yE JAEGER CNGIN[ERING WIY 64,m Vfdl irm. 1(-4 WA, "oil rw 1w. ps.1l s.,o-oue Christopher Brown CAS Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. (5. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 72ii Z-1909 and the adjacent Saghalie Junior High School. The junior high school has an enrollment of 750 students with 45 teachers and 30 support and administrative staff. To the northeast of the plat are a US Post Office and a significant shopping center anchored by a Fred Meyer's Store. This is the only proximate commercial area. The proposed site land use, as single and multi -family residences, will conform with immediate the neighborhood. Accordingly, from a traffic circulation perspective, it is not considered to be a conflicting land use. Transit Metro operates Route Number 903 along SW Campus Drive and 21t Avenue SW. Additionally, the Twin Lakes park `n ride lot is located on 21t Avenue SW between SW 341't and 344r' Streets. Typically, at the moment, it has about only 10 to 15 percent of its capacity used. It serves Transit Routes 178, 179, and 188. The South Federal Way park `n ride lot serving Transit Routes 174, 194, 196 and 197 is located on S. 348h Street at 9n' Avenue S. From a weekday observation it has about 20 percent of its capacity currently used. Doubtless, on completion of Wynstone and Plemmon's Plateau a new far -side Metro Bus stox for Route 903 will be installed, possibly at the intersection of SW Campus Drive and 10 Avenue SW. Phasing The project will not be phased over a long period of time but, rather, is to be a single and continuous effort. The anticipated date of full occupancy is taken toward the end of the year 2006 allowing some three years for construction, sales and occupancy. Considering the background growth rate used in this analysis any slippage of this date is not expected to materially alter any of the findings or conclusions. Traffic Characteristics The data of Figure 3, Current 2003 Traffic Folioes, were obtained from city files and in the field over the weekday afternoon peak hour as noted earlier. Christopher Brown Cn Awociatea 9688 Qainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 1 16" Avenue S. V) 00 en M 91h Avenue S. 6, I" Avenue S. 64h 9�e �4esW fA Enchanted Parkway S. Aacff �N/ � 7`h Avenue SW SITE CIO M Cl) �3 21S` Avenue SW FIGURE 3 Current (2003) Traffic Volumes -7- Christopher Brown CS 14: Associates 9688 12ainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 As described earlier, since the p.m. peak hour contains both employment related trips as well as shopping and some social -recreation travel, it is the largest peak hour of the working day and, accordingly, is used as the "design hour" of the project. Current p.m. peak hour data is shown on Figure 3, Current Daffic Volumes. Bus and truck frequencies are noted in the Appendix as a part of the computer data along with road grades, number and width of traffic lanes, geometric data and traffic control devices. Figure 3 and subsequent traffic volume figures are schematic and do not show any scale other than that associated with the respective traffic volumes. Street Svsteni The primary link to the regional arterial and highway network is SW campus Drive and thence to S. 3481' Street. For the most part these are 54ane arterial facilities with curbs, gutters and sidewalks. Signalization at the main intersections is based on pole -and -mast - arm styles with multi -phased signal controllers. The posted speed limit on this facility is 35 mph. Similarly, the newly built sections of the SW/S. 356t' Street Corridor have a 5-lane section and a posted speed limit of 40 mph. Between 1't Avenue S. and Pacific Highway South it is limited to 2-lanes at this writing. In this neighborhood 21" Avenue SW is likewise a 5-lane facility expect south of SW 348a' Street where it drops to a 4-lane section. For the most part, the north -south links between the SW Campus Drive/S. 348r' Street corridor and the S. 356'h Street corridor are 2-lane roadways with speed limits ranging from 25 to 35 mph. Since the major issues tend to be intersection capacity, the roadway intersection geometry is noted in the appendix for the several intersections analyzed in this TIA. The intersection data includes approach lanes, grades and signal phasing. Horizon Year Volumes Without Project Figure 4, 2006 Baseline Volumes is the horizon year forecast traffic volumes computed -8- ChriBtopher Brown (? Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. 6. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 �- 16�' Avenue S. ti�� �4p C�9 � ral, s4l 93 �y 0 fi rye y8 9th Avenue S I" Avenue S. 6-0 -It'e ves' FIGURE 4 2006 Baseline Traffic Volumes -9- 42 Enchanted Parkway S. 7'` Avenue SW 21" Avenue SW Nl� (j7jChristopher Brown (�Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 on the basis of the background traffic growth only. The data is further expanded with traffic from the three projects of record, Orchid Lane, Pena Subdivision and Lake Haven Estates as described earlier. The p.m. peak hour traffic for these three projects is shown on Figure 5, Adjacent Project's Peak Hour Traffic Data. Continuing, since the adjacent m-f project, Plemmon's Plateau, is also a possibility within the same time frame, that is, up to the year 2006, the data for this development has likewise been derived. As an adjacent project using the same street network and having the same trip distribution as Wynstone, its trip assignment has also been incorporated with the Wynstone data on Figure 6 for convenience. Last, the trip assignment for Plemmon's Plateau, the adjacent multi -family project that may be constructed by the project horizon year of 2006, is designated with an * so that it is clearly a separate component from the Wynstone trip assignment. Trip Generation As described earlier, trip generation for the 44-lot single-family residential development, Wynstone, is based on the most recent Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manua 1 6"' edition, for Land Use Code 210, the applicable reference for single-family residential developments. The data are based on the published average trip rates since it was observed that the Orchid Lane subdivision was based on that method. Additionally, the trip generation for Plemmon's Plateau is based on ITE Land Use Code 220, the applicable reference for m-f housing. The results are shown below. -10- Time Interval A.W.D.T. A.M. Inbound A.M. Outbound P.M. Inbound TABLE I Trip Generation Wynstone & Plemmon's Plateau Number of Trips Wynstone 487 Trips/day 10 vehicles/hour 30 vehicles/hour 33 vehicles/hour Plemmon's Plateau 126 Trips/day 2 vehicles/hour 8 vehicles/hour 8 vehicles/hour P.M. Outbound 18 vehicles/hour 4 vehicles/hour Christopher Brown 0 A&Bociate8 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 ti 16'h Avenue S. FIGURE 5 Adjacent Project's Peak Hour Traffic Data -11- L-A i Christopher Brown & Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 Continuing, the trip generation for the three adjacent projects of record is similarly based on the same ITE trip generation land use code for single family residences while the trip generation for the multi -family development is based on ITE land Use Code 220, Apartments. The data for these "pipeline projects" shown in Table II. TABLE H Trip Generation for Adjacent Developments Time Period Orchid Lane Lake Haven Pena Subdivision Estates A.W.D.T. 478 124 67 A.M. inbound 10 3 1 A.M. outbound 28 7 4 P.M. inbound 33 8 5 P.M. outbound 18 5 2 Trip Distribution & Assignment As noted earlier, the new traffic generated by Wynstone and Plemmon's Plateau is distributed onto the adjacent roadway system and then onto the regional transportation system in accordance with the Growth -Factor Method and is established by the estimated year 2010 employment forecast within a 20-mile radius of the sites. It is described in detail in Transportation and Land Developnment. Vergil G. Stover, 1988, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The assignment assumes equal probability of employment amongst the analysis zones and, further, does not assume any capacity restraints on any of the arterial or highways systems. The generalized year 2010 employment forecast, published by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) is tabulated for reference purposes by name of the dominant city or neighborhood. The data are shown on the next page in Table III. Note that not all traffic analysis zones fall completely within the 20-mile radius. All told, by the year 2006, it is assumed that about 826,000 jobs are located within a 20- mile radius and the trip distribution is based on that proximate spatial distribution. -12- Christopher brown 0 Ciii Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. (S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (205) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 TABLE III 2010 Employment Distribution City/Local Population Federal way 38,095 Auburn 48,781 Soos Creek 23,130 Tahoma raven Heights 5,635 Kent 60,780 Des Moines/SeaTac 70,497 Tukwila 60,877 Renton/Skyway 69,373 New Castle 6,849 Seattle South & CBD 113,751 Gig harbor 5,880 Fort Lewis & McChord AFB 48,016 Fircrest/Lakewood 39,960 Tacoma CBD 39,987 Tacoma, North End 31,944 NE Tacoma & Port 32,017 Tacoma South 33,162 Tacoma East 16,526 Parkland/Spanaway 18,634 Puyallup/Fredrickson 37,472 Sumner/Bonney Lake 24,507 Figure 6 shows the trip assignment for both Wynstone and Plemmon's Plateau. Year 2006 Horizon Year Traffic Figure 7, the 2006 Horizon Year Forecast with Pro'ects, displays the traffic volumes with all three of the adjacent developments completed and fully occupied including Wynstone and Plemmon's Plateau. In the previously described trip assignments of Figures 5 and 6 the data assumes no diversion due to inadequate traffic conditions (such as congestion) nor presumes any -13- Christopher brown 0 Associates 9688 12ainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 V M M 3 FIGURE 6 �V' Avenue S. VD F. 70, 9`h Avenue S. 1" Avenue S. 643 `9�ed oeS tp Enc.anted Parkway S. pac'fi �T N�LEGEND ` Peak Volumes �+ with 12th Aver 11 �� Sri 8 70' Avenue SW ,-r� %L 12th Ave., SW Linl Rachael Ridge Inbound 33 Outbound 18 Pleamton's Plateau Inbound 8* Outbound 4-)� Assignment, Wynstone & Plemmon's Plateau -14- 21" Avenue SW Christopher Brown 0 Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 QE (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 16" Avenue S. t b M 00 1W en 9th Avenue S. — 4 1"Avenue S. syo �9Le�4e -�L s� t� 'Y ��a o ti SITE `A V FIGURE 7 2006 Horizon Year Forecast with Projects -15- Enchanted Parkway S. A dc��c h;��ays 'x� A 7'' Avenue SW 8 12th Ave. SW _ 31.- Data at this inter. 1g assumes site traffic uses 12th Ave. SW link-3 21 " ,Avenue SW I wn 0 Associates . S. 18-5981 4:3=ax ('206) 722-1909 geometrically deficient or capacity inadequate linkages by the horizon year of 2006. In effect, it was an unrestrained assignment with only a moderate adjustment to conform to advice of the city's traffic analyst. Similarly, the 12' Avenue SW corridor is assumed unused by site traffic due to poor travel -times as described in later analyses. (However, as requested, in both Figures 6 and 7 an estimate of site traffic demands is made along the 12`h Avenue SW corridor with that data shown in "clouds". This supplemental analysis was performed for estimating purposes only and is not considered appropriate at this time due to poor levels of service at SW 356th Street and 13th Way SW, as noted below.) Capacity Analysis Capacity analysis was performed with the TEAPAC software published by Strong Concepts of Northbrook, Illinois, and used under license to Christopher Brown, P.E. The results of the analysis are noted in Table IV. When reviewing the following LOS summaries, note that the computer input and results are included in the Anendix. The appendix computations show the degree of saturation, average delays, maximum queue lengths and approach LOS values as well as the overall LOS values at signalized intersections. For simplicity, only the overall LOS and average per vehicle delay (in seconds) are used in the following table. TABLE IV Levels of Service & Average Delay Intersection Current 2006 2006 Year No Project W/Project LOS v/c Delay LOS v/c Delay LOS v/c Delay S. 348 /Enchanted Pkwy. D 0.81 49.0 E 0.85 57.8 E 0.86 58.5 S. 348t17Pacific Hwy. S. E 0.92 66.3 E 0.97 78.9 E 0.97 79.9 S. 348th/9P Ave. S. E 0.84 58.2 E 0.91 76.6 E 0.91 76.5 S. 348'/Ist Ave. S. E 0.91 73.1 E 0.93 79.2 D 0.81 54.6 A Campus Drive/61h Ave. S. B 0.58 20.0 C 0.64 21.7 C 0.65 22.0 Campus Drive/10th Ave. S. D 0.73 37.8 E 0.84 67.3 D 0.80 49.6 B S. 356'h/Pacific Hwy. S. E 0.78 66.3 E 0.84 78.6 E 0.83 79.0 S. 356n'/1st Ave. S. D 0.66 37.1 D 0.71 40.7 D 0.72 41.0 S. 35e/7'h/8' Ave. S. C 0.52 21.7 C 0.56 22.2 C 0.56 22.3 SW 356th/215t Ave. SW E 0.81 55.1 E 0.88 73.3 E 0.88 74.2 SW 336th/21St Ave. SW E 0.88 68.8 E 0.92 79.8 E 0.92 79.9 ---SW 356'113th Way SW F 0.60 99.0 F 0.80247.7 F 0.92255.6c Chrikopher Brown 0 Awodateg 9688 Rainier Ave. S. -16- Seattle, WA 98118-5981 C* (206) 722-1910 )±ax (206) 722-1909 LOS Footnotes A. Revised signal phasing to use concurrent north -south timing (Phase 1) and split phase on the east -west movements to use a protected eastbound left turn phase followed by permissive phasing. B. Would be enhanced to LOS D with 54.6 seconds of delay if revised to use a leading protected phase for the westbound through plus left turns and lagging eastbound through plus left turns. C. This poor LOS is due to currently used STOP control. Signal warrants do not exist at this intersection and may not for some time to come. In addition to the footnotes in the table of the previous page, and described above, the following assumptions are also considered in the LOS analysis. Accordingly, the results of: this table represent a worst -case scenario. 1. No arterial street improvements per the city's 6-Year TIP are completed. 2. The 12't' Avenue SW extension through Orchid Lane to SW 346th Street is open to site traffic and, accordingly, this route is also assessed for traffic destined to the southwest as a separate or alternative option as shown on Figures 6 and 7 in "clouds". As noted above, however, the poor LOS implies this will more than likely not occur and so the poor LOS may be discounted as not applicable. In summary, with the foregoing worst -case scenario capacity analysis it appears that the project, in concert with the three adjacent projects of record and the future m-f project of Plemmon's Plateau, can be accommodated on the arterial network with no significant operational constraints. The combination of the Wynstone project and the three adjacent projects along with the m-f project, Plemmon's Plateau, will not adversely impact any of the described intersections: none will fall below the city's adopted minimum threshold, LOS E, (with v/c ratio less then 1.0) which has been established for SEPA concurrency. Access Street Design Considerations The project will gain it principal access via loth Avenue SW at SW Campus Drive. As shown on the appended LOS computations, the assumed roadway geometry for the new linkage LOS analysis includes only a single lane approach on the new loth Avenue SW south leg. This is noted in the appended LOS analysis under File RR-P6P. Further, as shown in the LOS computations, the signal for IOth Avenue SW is timed with concurrent north/south phasing. Naturally, if a 2-lane approach is constructed as a part of the 12th Avenue SW corridor project, and if that design incorporates a northbound right -turn -only (RTO) lane, then it will operate with a higher performance level. Essentially, from the LOS analysis, a single lane approach is entirely adequate for the needs of both Wynstone and the m-f project of Plemmon's Plateau. Christopher brown 0 Associates -17- 9688 12ainier Ave. cS. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 Last, recognizing that the proposed plat will also be connected via SW 339th Place to the adjacent Saghalie Junior High School and the adjoining city park, it is assumed that a standard pedestrian sidewalk on this new collector road is included so that school related pedestrian traffic is safely accommodated. Traffic Hazard Traffic accident data was obtained from city files for the interval 1999 — 2002 along the SW Campus Drive and S. 348th Street corridor from 21st Avenue SW to Pacific Highway South. The accident rate for the 21" Avenue SW -1st Avenue S. section was computed at 2.88 accidents per million vehicle miles of travel. The WSDOT published rate for an urban principal arterial is 2.97 accidents per million vehicle miles of travel. Accordingly, on the basis of this statistic there is no reason to assume that accidents on this section are occurring at a rate that is beyond reasonable expectations. In essence, with an accident rate that is comparable with typical principal arterial accident rates there is no reason to assume any significant adverse hazards that would be further impacted by the project. For the section from 1st Avenue S. to Pacific Highway S. the accident rate was computed at 6.77 per accidents per million vehicle miles of travel. This is a rather high accident rate and explains why the city's transportation improvement plan (TIP) contains Project Number 8, that adds HOV lames and a 2nd northbound left turn lane at Pacific Highway S. and a raised median that will significantly reduce mid -block accidents. Importantly, as shown later, the proposed Wynstone project contributes funding to this improvement program. The financial contribution will offset the project's impacts and is considered an appropriate mitigation element. Additionally, while the foregoing may be considered somewhat generalized in that the accident rate references are based on WSDOT published statistics, at the request of the city's staff review person, an additional analysis was undertaken. For this analysis the Control Chart Method was used. The level of significance set at 0.95 as commonly done. In the Control Chart Method a critical accident rate is calculated for each intersection based on the average accident rate for all sampled intersections in the network. Where the actual accident rate is larger than the critical rate (as highlighted in the following table) the deviation is most likely not due to chance but, rather, due to an unfavorable characteristic. This analysis will allow the city to review in depth how their existing system is functioning. -18- *:Z= wn CAS Amociate8 . S. 8-5981 ax (Z06) TZZ-1909 TABLE V Control Cbart Analysis. v=0.95 Intersection 3-year Fx. Int. Vol. Rate Critical Rate S. 336th/SR 99 47 16.88 0.93 1.31 SW 33e12l't Ave. SW 13 14.83 0.29 1.34 SW 336th/19tt' Ave. SW 32 12.30 0.87 1.39 Campus D010u' Ave. SW 38 11.24 1*13 1.41 Campus Dr./6th Ave. SW 16 9.30 0.57 1.47 S. 34e St./Is' Ave. S. 48 14.95 1.07 1.34 S. 348' St./9th Ave. S. 44 12.05 1.22 1.39 S. 348" St/SR 99 106 16.97 2.08 1.31 * S. 348th St./SR 161 32 20.98 0.51 1.27 S. 348' St./21' Ave. SW 8 5.74 0.47 1.64 S. 35e St/21"Ave. SW 44 7.99 1.84 1.52 * S. 356th St./8th Way SW 4 6.50 0.20 1.59 S. 356' St./lit Ave. S. 19 8.75 0.72 1.49 S. 356th St./SR 99 23 10.69 0.72 1.43 In the above able the following abbreviations are used. Int. Vol. = Traffic volume entering the intersection. 3-year Fx. = Total intersection 3-year accident frequency. Rate = Accident rate for the intersection (Accidents per MEV) Critical Rate = The critical accident rate = upper control limit at p = 0.95 When reviewing Table V it will be seen that only two intersections (*) have accident rates that exceed the "critical accident rate" computed for that intersection at the noted level of significance. These are at South 348th Street and Pacific Highway S. (SR 99) and South 348 Street at Enchanted Parkway (SR, 161). Considering the amount of traffic through these intersections the results are not unexpected. As shown next, both of these intersections are being improved with future 6-Year TIP expenditures. Mitigation Fees There will be three TIP projects proposed for the 2006-road system that are impacted by Wynstone in its horizon year. These are noted below. -19- ChriBtopher Brown 0 AssociateC* s 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 7T22-1909 Erect Humber 8 — Adding HOV lanes, turn lanes and a raised median on S. 348' Street from SO Avenue S. to Pacific Highway S. The fair share mitigation fee is computed at: 12 trips/1,750 DHV X $7,242,000 = $49,659 Proiect Humber 11— Widening to 5-lanes and adding bike lanes and illumination on South 35e Street from 1st Avenue S. to Pacific Highway S. The fair share mitigation fee is computed at: 17 trips/3,539 DHV X $8,405,000 = $40,374 Project Humber 13 --- SR 18 at SR 161, Enchanted Parkway S. Adding eastbound and westbound right turn lanes, a P westbound left turn lane, and a P lane on SR 161 southbound to 352nd. The fair share mitigation fee is computed at: 11 trips/5,473 DHV X $3,335,000 = $6,703 The grand total of $96,736 should be considered appropriate and sufficient for mitigating all site related traffic impacts. Last, while it may be noted that the connection of SW 339th Place to link SW Campus Drivell0th Avenue SW to both Saghalie Junior High School and Saghalie City Park is a major community benefit, particularly for those neighborhoods lying to the north of SW Campus Drive, the developer's participation in carrying out and implementing these improvements are code required for project approval and will be accomplished as the plat is developed to ensure a complete network. Diverted Traffic to SW 339"' Place The estimated traffic diversion from 19th Way SW at both Saghalie Junior High School and Saghalie City Park onto the new SW Campus Drive/ 10n' Avenue SW intersection and thence via 12th Avenue SW onto the SW 335P Place linkage to this school and park is estimated to be 25 percent of the current (year 2003) p.m. peak hour volume. The current observed p.m. peak hour volume on 19th Way SW from May 10 field counts includes: 5 8 inbound trips 69 outbound trips The diversion onto SW 339th Place is estimated to be as follows. -20- Christopher brown (r Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 15 inbound trips 17 outbound trips Without the connection the site would add: 10 inbound trips 5 outbound trips With this new connection the estimated off -site traffic using the new SW 339P Place to access Saghalie Junior High School and Saghalie City Park is: 32/47 = 68 percent Accordingly, the community benefit of this new link is in the order of 68 percent of its construction and right-of-way cost. The dollar value has not been computed at this time but nevertheless that value should be considered and weighed when addressing the $96,736 mitigation fees described on page 20. Last, this diversion addresses only current volumes. It does not include new volumes from recently proposed adjacent developments nor does it consider attracted traffic that will be brought into the neighborhood on completion of the 12n' Avenue SW project. Conclusions The following conclusions may be considered with respect to the proposed 44-lot single- family residential development — Wynstone. • The development, as a single-family residential project, conforms to the neighborhood as it is currently developing. • The road network under review in this TiA includes the SW 33e Street -SW Campus Drive-S. 348n` Street and SW/S. 356 h Street corridors west of 21" Avenue SW. • All of these roads have adequate levels of service at this date. • Based on the 6 b edition of Traffic Generation it will generate 487 trips per day with 40 of these taking place in the morning and 51 in the p.m. peak hour. • For analysis purposes the time when the project is complete and fully occupied is taken at the year 2006. This is the horizon year for the TIA. ■ The traffic assignment of site -generated traffic is based on the 2010 employment forecast prepared by PSRC lying within a 20-mile radius of the site. This extends to the Seattle central business district (CBD) to the north and the Tacoma CBD to the south. -21- Christopher brown CAS cii Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 • An adjacent 19-unit, m-f project on the same property, yet to be formally proposed, is also included with this traffic analysis. • For this study, the m-f development is named Plemmons Plateau. ■ In addition to the Wynstone and Plemmons Plateau developments, three adjacent (pipeline) projects that may be completed in the same time frame are included. • These three pipeline projects are the plats of Orchid Lane, Pena Subdivision and Lake Haven Estates. • On completion of the Wynstone and Plemmons Plateau developments and the three pipeline projects an acceptable LOS is derived at those intersections impacted by 10 or more site generated trips in the horizon year of 2006. • To obtain an adequate LOS, minor revisions to the traffic signal phasing at two intersections is required. • The two signals requiring signal phasing modifications are located at S. 348' Street and l't Ave. S. and Campus Drive SW at le Avenue SW. • One portion of the SW 336n' Street -SW Campus Drive-S. 348t' Street corridor has an accident rate above the typical rate for principal arterial streets. It is proposed for improvement in the city's TIP. • Based on a Control Chart Analysis with p @ 0.95, two intersections have accident rates that are statistically significant. • Intersections with significant accident rates are located at South 348t' Street and Pacific Highway S. (SR 99) and South 348"' Street at Enchanted Parkway. • Off site traffic mitigation fees based on proportionate fair -share cost estimates with 2006 traffic forecasts are in the order of $96,736. • Since a portion of the project includes connecting SW Campus Drive to Saghalie Junior High School and Saghalie City Park and recognizing about 68 percent of the traffic on this new link is from the neighborhoods lying to the north a pro-rata share of the cost of this link should be considered to off -set the above mitigation fee. • The site's main access is at SW Campus Drive and 10t' Avenue SW where the existing traffic signal is being modified to accommodate the new (south) leg of the intersection and a 2-lane approach is to be constructed. • Based on only the site's generated traffic, a single lane approach at the signal would be entirely sufficient for handling all site traffic. • Forecast traffic volumes for the 12t' Avenue SW corridor project are shown in the traffic study for a neighboring project entitled Campus Crest. • Absent a traffic signal at the intersection of 13"' Way SW/SW 356t' Street the poor LOS in the horizon year suggests that this corridor will not be well used by site generated traffic in the peak hour. Alternate routes to the south will prevail. • In summary, the project can be accommodated on the street network without significant impacts. -22- Christopher Brown CAS Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. CC*Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Addendum Supplemental Analysis: IOn' Avenue SW/Campus Drive SW with I Avenue Extension. Introduction: The following analysis revises the subject intersection to incorporate the model p.m. peak hour computer output (attached) with intersection turning movements based on the estimated turn percentages. Attached are traffic diagrams showing, in order, the following data. 1. 2006 forecast data with projects, Figure 7 of page 15 of the TIA. 2. Link volumes from the network computer "output" showing, in a red "cloud" the volumes on the new extension, e.g. 73 vph outbound and 207 vph inbound. 3. Diagram showing these volumes as "turning and through movements". 4. Final diagram with the Figure 7 TIA data plus the data of Item 3, above. 5. LOS computations for the data of Item 4, above. The intersection will operate at LOS E with a v/c ratio of 57.5 given the phase sequence shown on the data sheet. Note the assumption of free right turns on the north leg (144 vph) equal to the westbound left turn movement on SW Campus Drive. Note that the pedestrian crossing times of 30 seconds to cross Campus Drive and 53 seconds for crossing I& Avenue SW are adequate for that purpose. Christopher brown 0 Awociate8 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 16" Avenue S. Enchanted Parkway S. 00 e `� I h Adei A wa 9`h Avenue S. +� A 1 S` Avenue S. s3a G9' � ye�Ue joy s� 9� 3x o l �r 7�' Avenue SW 8 a 1 SITE N Z 12th Ave. SW S2 t k� ]O Data at this inter. 1g 3 3 assumes site traffic uses 12th Ave. SW 1ink:7 21,Avenue SW FIGURE 7 Chriatopher Brown Cn A88ociate8 2006 Horizon Year Forecast with Projects 9688 Rainier Ave. (S. (Seattle, WA 98118-5981 -15- {ZO6} 'ZZZ-1910 Fax {206) 722-1909 A�\ 699 (v. Iss A& 163 C). CN 13 17ZB CO P9L All, C-4 co U) ,rq IF cnA a TV41rTV)j5rffF7jj TTT.'N 97TT-,TQ0007 VVJ Tf,!nT T,,nn7/C7ion loth Avenue SW 6 G r"), SI �2C 28 2006 Forecast with Adjacent Projects & Wynstone �fl 0 0 0 �U 10th Avenue SW 20�1 -41-11 10th Avenue SW. 73 g3 a b 6 2� Link Volumes from Computer Output with Estimated Turns Summation of data for LOS Analysis, 2006 Forecast with 12th Avenue SW Linkage Completed as a Through Road *iisg= wn 0 AaBociatcs . S. 18-5981 ax (206) '�L2-1909 TRAFFIC LWPA CTANAL YSIS Aimendix Table of Contents 1. ITE LUC 210, Single -Family Detached Housing— Definition 2. ITE LUC 210, Single -Family Detached Housing— weekday traffic 3. ITE LUC 210, Single -Family Detached Housing— a.m. peak traffic 4. ITE LUC 210, Single -Family Detached Housing—X.m. peak traffic 5. Traffic Count Summary— 21St Avenue S./SW 356 Street 6. Traffic Count Summary, — 16'h Avenue S./Enchanted Parkway/S. 348th Street 7. Traffic Count Summary — 6'h Avenue SW/SW Campus Drive 8. Traffic Count Summary — I't Avenue S./S. 348' Street 9. Traffic Count Summary — 8th Avenue S./S. 356th Street 10. Traffic Count Summary — 19'h Avenue S./SW 33e Street 11. Traffic Count Summary — 9'h Avenue S./S. 348th Street 12. Traffic Volumes via Synchro - Pacific Highway S./S. 356'h Street 13. Traffic Volumes via Synchro -Pacific Highway S./S. 348" Street 14. Traffic Volumes via Synchro — 21" Avenue S./S. 336' Street 15. Traffic Count Summary — 10'' Avenue SWISW Campus Drive 16. Traffic Count Summary — lst Avenue S./S. 35e Street Levels of Service Current {2003) Year Analysis Enchanted Parkway/S. 3480' Street Current Volumes RR-C1P 1. Pacific Highway S./S. 348"' Street Current Volumes RR-C2P 3. 9'h Avenue S./S. 348t' Street Current Volumes RR-C3P 5. lst Avenue S./S. 348th Street Current Volumes RR-C4P 7. 6'h Avenue SW/SW Campus Drive Current Volumes RR-05P 9. 100' Avenue SW/SW Campus Drive Current Volumes RR-C6P 11, Pacific Highway S./S. 356`h Street Current Volumes RR-C7P 13. I"' Avenue S_IS, 356" Street Current Volumes RR-C8P 15. 8th Avenue SIS. 356th Street Current Volumes RR-C9P IT 21" Avenue S./S. 356'' Street Current Volumes RR-CIOP 19. 21st Avenue S./S. 336th Street Current Volumes RR-C11P 21. Year 2006 Analysis with Pipeline Projects Only Enchanted Parkway/S. 348th Street 2006 without Project RR -HIP 23, Pacific Highway S./S. 348th Street 2006 without Project RR-H2P 25. Christopher Brown CAS Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. 6cattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 7224910 Fax (206) 722-1909 Continuation TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Appendix Table of Contents Year 2006 Analysis with Pipeline Projects Dnt 9'h Avenue S./S. 348'h Street 2006 without Project RR-H3P 27. 1" Avenue S./S. 348'h Street 2006 without Project RR-H4P 29. 6'h Avenue SW/SW Campus Drive 2006 without Project RR-H5P 31. 10'h Avenue SW/SW CamgTus Drive 2006 without Project RR-H6P 33. Pacific Highway S./S. 356 Street 2006 without Project RR-H7P 35. I" Avenue S./S. 35e Street 2006 without Project RR-H8P 37. 8'h Avenue S./S. 356'h Street 2006 without Project RR-H9P 39. 21" Avenue S./S. 35e Street 2006 without Project RR-H10P 41. 21" Avenue S./S. 336'h Street 2006 without Project RR-H11P 43. Year 2006 Analysis with Pipeline Projects & W nstone SF & UT Development Enchanted Parkway/S. 348h Street 2006 with Project RR -PIP 45, Pacific Highway S./S. 348'h Street 2006 with Project RR-P2P 47. 9`h Avenue S./S. 348t` Street 2006 with Project RR-P3P 49. 1'' Avenue S./S. 348'h Street 2006 with Project RR-P4P 51. 6'h Avenue SW/SW Campus Drive 2006 with Project RR-H5P 53. 100h Avenue SW/SW Campus Drive 2006 with Project RR-P6P 55. Pacific Highway S./S. 35e Street 2006 with Project RR-P7P 5T 1'' Avenue S./S. 356a' Street 2006 with Project RR-P8P 59. 8'h Avenue S./S. 356'h Street 2006 with Project RR-P9P 61. 21'' Avenue S./S. 356'h Street 2006 with Project RR-P10P 63. 21S' Avenue S./S. 336'h Street 2006 with Project RR-P11P 65. 13'h Way South/SW 356'' Street Analysis with 12th Avenue SW Corridor 13'h Way South/SW 356'h Street Current Volumes RR-C12P 67. 13'h Way South/SW 356'h Street 2006 without Project RR-H12P 68. 13'h Way South/SW 356h Street 2006 with Project RR-P12P 69. Christopher Brown 0 Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, USIA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 Wynstone, nee Rachel Ridge 04/27/04 10th Avenue SW at Campus Drive SW 13:19:27 2006 Volumes with Project Plus 12th Ave. File RR-P6P12 SIGNA1,97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 6 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONRED$ 144 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 499 44 126 12.0 12.0 .0 1 1 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .92 .81 .81 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 1409 0 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 142 1499 144 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .98 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3547 1805 SEQUENCES 14 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES NO CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 30.31 20.89 53.80 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 1 12 5 NO YES RT TH LT 51 9 45 12.0 12.0 .0 1 1 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .85 1.00 .85 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 1103 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 76 770 260 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .92 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3515 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Wynstone, nee Rachel Ridge 04/27/04 10th Avenue SW at Campus Drive SW 13:18:03 2006 Volumes with Project Plus 12th Ave. File RR-P6P12 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int 4 6 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .84 Vehicle Delay 57.5 Level of Service E+ Sq 14 / i \ North -Phase l I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I -------------------------------------- v ^ ++++ **** v + + + v --------------------------------- G/C= .253 G/C= .174 G/C= .448 G= 30.3" G= 20.9" G= 53.8" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=29.4% OFF=51.0% -------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=105.0 sec = 87.5% Y=15.0 sec = 12.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% - Lane Width/ g/C Service RateAdj ` -^ HCM I I L 90% Max l Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E ]Volumel v/c Delay S Queue------------------------------------------------------------------------------ N Approach 63.4 E+ 395 386 75.1 ILT+TH 1 12/1 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .304 .253 1 53 I 340 1 210 I .59`0 1 42.0 J*E D+J 262 ftI S Approach 35.5 D+ .253 .147 12/1 ILT+TH l l ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .262 l .253 � 40 1 260 621 .222 1 35.9 1 D+� 77 ft E Approach 70.3 E 1371 -------------------------------------- 1290 681 1153 72.5 LT+RT1 12/1 f ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .273 1 .174 �1.057 .487 1 45.9 J*E D 211 ft W Approach 37.2 D+ 1361 ILT+RT 12/1 1 .307 1 .174 1 11290 1 283 1 .901 1 75.9*E+I 390 ft Land Use: 210 Single -Family Detached Housing Description Single-family detached housing includes all single-family detached homes on individual lots. A typical site surveyed is a suburban subdivision. Additional Data The peak hour of the generator typically coincides with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. The sites were surveyed from the late 1960s to the mid-1990s throughout the United States and Canada. The number of vehicles and the number of residents have a high correlation with average weekday vehicle trip ends. The use of these variables is limited, however, because the number of vehicles and residents is often difficult to obtain or predict. The number of dwelling units is generally used as the independent variable of choice because it is usually readily available, easy to project, and has a high correlation with average weekday vehicle trip ends. This land use includes data from a wide variety of units with different sizes, price ranges, locations, and ages. Consequently, there is a wide variation in trips generated within this category. As expected, dwelling units that were larger in size, more expensive, or farther away from the central business district (CBD) had a higher rate of trip generation per unit than those smaller in size, less expensive, or closer to the CBD. Other factors, such as geographic location and type of adjacent and nearby development, may also have had an effect on the site trip generation. Single-family detached units have the highest trip generation rate per dwelling unit of all residential uses, because they are the largest units in size and have more residents and more vehicles per unit than other residential land uses; they are generally located farther away from shopping centers, employment areas, and other trip attractors than are other residential land uses; and they generally have fewer alternate modes of transportation available, because they are typically not as concentrated as other residential land uses. Source Numbers 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 19, 20, 21, 26, 34, 35, 36, 38, 40, 71, 72 84, 91, 98, 100, 105, 108, 110, 114, 117, 119, 157, 167, 177, 187, 192, 207, 211, 246, 275, 283, 293, 300, 319, 320, 357, 384, 435 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 262 Institute of Transportation Engineers Singlie-Family Detached Housing (210) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 348 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 198 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 9.57 4.31 - 21.85 3.69 Data Plot and Equation 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 X ................. ......... ........ ............. X X X ................... ..................... -------------- •X X X X 0 1000 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points - Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.920 Ln(X) + 2.707 2000 3000 ------ Average Rate R2 = 0.96 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 263 Institute of Transportation Engineers �l Single -Family Detached Housing (21 0) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Number of Studies: 271 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 202 Directional Distribution: 25% entering, 75% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.75 0.33 - 2.27 0.90 Data Plot and Equation 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 1000 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.700(X) + 9.477 r• 2000 ---"- Average Rate R2 = 0.89 3000 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 264 Institute of Transportation Engineers Single -Family Detached Housing (21 Q) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 294 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 216 Directional Distribution: 64% entering, 36% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.01 0,42 - 2,98 1.05 Data Plot and Equation H 3,OOC 2,000 1,000 0 X X _ . . _ . . . .. . . . 1. . . _ . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . X X : X X" ................... ....................... X r' X X ; X 0 1000 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.901 Ln(X) + 0.527 2000 3000 -"'-- Average Rate R2 = 0.91 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 265 Institute of Transportation Engineers TRAFFIC VQLUPAE 4- INTERSECTICN CF:_ T IAA E -1 TC 01"6-6) SUMMARY DATE /� DAY Pec AND 5-/tf As11-e/ P = PEAK HCU R T I m ` i S` R ` S R` 5 R L 5 It - /.- f o I C) l C) z 0 l 5" _ 'AW I C IF2 1 D i© 0 i f 0 o! I '- tyl 0 D 10 Iza f I Ge d o3_ l l C> f I I I ! k I-�z 4 f 1 I f # I k T OTALS f I I I N f TRAFFIC YOLUMh SUMMA Y PQ0.1E�T �' DATE �4r PA:e> ' DAY INTi15ECTICN CF: r� �'� � %CTAN0 -57 -fl '-1�r�,� _ TIME TC P-= PSAX HOUR T 1 All E ;c � c J •+�; L S It S R L S I it L S R Imo' Ilen �I old I of I 9 3� lXY7 �y I it lg�; 0 �-v I _ 2 92 ,-71zl- I .s- / I I I �� Z I i I I i I I I I i I p I I �Ty 13 I 2 -5- N I I I I I I I i I i I I i I I I t I I I i I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I l i l I I i I I I I I I I I i I f I • I I TQTALS *4 TOTAL I I I r I I I t I I 4 i I I I I I I 4 N I I I I I I I I I TC2 Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. 13623 184th Ave NE, Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: (425) 861-8866 FAX: (425) 861-8877 Intersection: Location: Vehicle Volume Summary 6th Ave SW @ SW Campus Dr Federal Way Date of Count: Checked By: Thu 2.20.03 FH Time Interval From North on (SB) KC A uatic Center From South on (NB) 6th Ave SW From East on (WB) SW Cam us Dr From West on (EB) SW Campus Dr Interval Total Endina at T7 L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 4:15 P 0 5 1 3 0 7 1 23 0 24 270 49 2 3 128 14 528 4:30 P 0 5 0 1 0 19 0 15 1 36 323 40 0 5 171 24 639 4:45.P 0 16 3 1 0 10 2 17 0 42 297 43 1 3 166 19 619 5:00 P 0 9 0 1 0 0 1 13 1 1 23 0 1 47 307 27 0 9 178 21 635 5:15 P 0 10 1 0 0 15 0 17 1 39 336 18 2 2 170 16 624 5:30 P 0 7 1 0 0 9 1 28 0 41 324 20 0 1 -162 23 617 5:45 P 0 7 0 2 0 18 0 12 0 58 351 25 1 5 192 21 691 6:00 P 0 10 4 2 0 17 1 17 0 41 332 15 1 0 189 18 646 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 6:30P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 7:00P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Surve 0 69 10 9 0 108 6 152 2 328 2540 237 7t28 1356 156 4999 5:00 P to 6:00 P Peak Hour Summary Total 0 34 6 4 0 59 2 1 74 1 1 179 1 13431 78 4 1 8 1 713 1 78 2578 Approach 44 135 1600 799 2578 %HV 0% 0% 0% 1 % 0% PHF 0.69 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.93 Prepared Legend: For: T= Number of heavy vehicles (greater than 4 wheels) L= Left -Turn S= Straight R= Right -Turn HV= Heavy Vehicles PHF= Peak hour Factor (Peak hour volume / (4*Highest 15 minutes)) City of Federal Way K03u001-007 TCZ Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. 13623 184th Ave NE, Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: (425) 861-8866 FAX: (425) 861-8877 Intersection: Location: Vehicle Volume Summary 1st Ave S @ S 348th St Federal Way Date of Count: Checked By: Wed 2.12.03 FH Time Interval From North on (SB) 1st Ave S From South on (NB) 1st Ave S From East on (WB) S 348th St From West on (EB) S 348th St Interval Total Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 415 P 2 43 88 58 2 19 54 16 1 63 282 52 2 47 149 23 894 4:30 P 2 37 73 47 3 25 52 19 2 43 353 50 1 47 182 21 9.49 4:45 P 2 41 136 63 0 22 54 9 3 62 287 35 2 33 156 19 917 5:00 P 0 40 84 66 2 17 61 14 1 55 346 43 2 45 205 26 1002 5:15 P 2 48 157 89 2 26 80 1 14 0 62 29.5 45 3 33 149 23 1021 5:30 P 0 46 120 82 0 21 62 7 0 53 341 45 4 42 204 30 1053 5:45 P 0 50 131 73 2 22 6,9 13 1 52 327 50 1 42 167 24 1020 6:00 P 1 38 103 62 1 27 53 15 0 50 379 45 2 39 134 19 964 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,45 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Survey 9 343 1 892 1 540 1 12 j 179 j 485 107 8 440 2610 365 17 328 1346 185 7820 4:45 P to 5.45 P Peak Hour Summary Total 2 184 492 1 310 6 86 1 272 1 48 2 222 1309 183 10 162 725 103 4096 Approach 986 406 1714 990 4096 %HV 0% 1 % 0% 1 % 0% PHF 0.84 0.85 0.97 0.90 0.97 Legend: Prepared For: T= Number of heavy vehicles (greater than 4 wheels) L= Left -Turn S= Straight R= Right -Turn HV= Heavy Vehicles PHF= Peak hour Factor (Peak hour volume / (4*Highest 15 minutes)) City of Federal Way K03u001-005p TCZ Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. 13623 184th Ave NE, Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: (425) 861-8866 FAX: (425) 861-8877 Intersection: Location: Vehicle Volume Summary 8th Ave SW @ SW 356th St Federal Way Date of Count: Checked By: Tue 2.11.03 FH Time Interval From North on (SB) 8th Ave SW From South on (NB) 8th Ave SW From East on (WB) SW 356th St From West on (EB) SW 356th St Interval Total Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 4:15 P 5 1 14 1 28 0 3 1 9 0 4 199 12 0 8 101 3 383 4:30 P 0 17 0 11 0 2 3 10 0 7 224 17 3 10 151 3 455 4,:45 P 1 15 1 13 0 1 0 8 1 4 24.6 12 0 5 114 4 423 5:00 P 0 8 2 11 0 2 1 0 2 6 239 1 9 1 0 8 1 122 1 409 5:15 P 0 9 1 7 0 2 0 4 0 9 284 12 0 3 133 2 466 5:30 P 0 1 10 3 9 0 1 0 1 1 0 8 280 15 0 7 161 4 499 5:45 P 0 1 11 2 5 0 3 0 4 0 4 270 12 0 8 132 3 454 6:00 P 0 5 1 10 0 2 1 4 0 5 276 11 0 9 130 0 454 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6A5 ,P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Total Survey 6 89 11 94 0 16 1 6 1 40 1 3 47 1 20181 1001 3 58 1044 20 3543 5:00 P to 6:001T Peak Hour Summary Total 0 1 35 7 31 0 8 1 1 13 0 1 26 1 11101 50 0 1 27 1 556 1 9 1873 Approach 73 22 1186 592 1873 %HV 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% PHF 0.83 0.79 0.97 0.86 0.94 Legend: Prepared For: T= Number of heavy vehicles (greater than 4 wheels) L= Left -Turn S= Straight R= Right -Turn HV= Heavy Vehicles PHF= Peak hour Factor (Peak hour volume / (4*Highest 15 minutes)) City of Federal Way K03u001-002p TCz Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. 13623 184th Ave NE, Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: (425) 861-8866 FAX: (425) 861-8877 Intersection: Location: Vehicle Volume Summary 19th Ave SW @ SW 336th St Federal Way Date of Count: Checked By: Wed 2.19.03 FH Time Interval From North on (SB) 19th Ave SW From South on (NB) 19th Ave SW From East on (WB) SW 336th St From West on (EB) SW 336th St Interval Total Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 4:15 P 0 8 2 15 0 39 3 49 1 54 252 22 0 16 171 13 644 4:30 P 0 10 5 10 0 52 4 68 0 47 275 15 0 29 175 21 711 4:45 P 0 15 2 7 0 42 6 .45 1 65 289 16 0- 22 207 16 732 5:00 P 0 7 4 1 12 1 1 44 6 1 48 1 65 250 12 0 14 168 26 656 5:15 P 0 8 5 8 0 45 5 49 0 59 271 22 1 12' 170 21 675 5:30 P 0 7 1 8 0 45 3 42 0 54 311 17 0 20 175 14 697 5:45 P 0 13 0 6 0 37 1 48 0 5.4 308 10 0 17 193 13 700 6:00 P 0 12 1 10 0 41 4 41 0 74 282 10 1 28 199 14 716 615P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Total Survey0 80 20 76 1 345 32 390 3 472 2238 124 2 158 1458 138 5531 5:00 P to 0:00 P Peak Hour Summary Total 0 40 7 32 0 168 13 1 180 0 1 241 1 11721 59 2 1 77 1 737 1 62 2788 Ap roach 79 361 1472 876 2788 %HV 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% PHF 0.86 0.91 0.96 0.91 0.97 Legend: Prepared For: T= Number of heavy vehicles (greater than 4 wheels) L= Left -Turn S= Straight R= Right -Turn HV= Heavy Vehicles PHF= Peak hour Factor (Peak hour Volume / (4"Highest 15 minutes)) City of Federal Way 1<03001-038p TCZ Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. 13623 184th Ave NE, Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: (425) 861-8866 FAX: (425) 861-8877 Intersection Location: Vehicle Volume Summary 9th Ave S @ S 348th St Federal Way Date of Count: Wed 2.12.03 Checked By: FH Time Interval From North on (SB) 9th Ave S From South on (NB) 9th Ave S From East on (WB) S 348th St From West on (EB) S 348th St Interval Total End! at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L S R 4:15 P 1 1 114 1 46 1 11 1 4 5 1 344 57 0 16 187 2 784 4:30 P 3 77 0 37 2 39 8 12 4 6 331 63 1 1 28 219 2 822 4:45 P 1 90 1 50 1 16 0 9 5 8 327 78 1 19 208 4 810 5:00 P 2 77 3 40 2 22 5 18 3 4 319 63 1 27 224 3 805 5:15 P 1 127 2 52 1 16 0 7 0 4 334 24 2 16 230 2 814 5:30 P 1 77 0 27 3 27 5 1 11 2 4 369 43 1 12 230 4 809 5:45 P 3 76 1 34 3 22 10 9 3 7 386 57 1 17 238 4 861 6:00 P 3 68 1 14 2 32 3 8 2 3 397 40 1 9 169 3 747 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30P 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Survey 15 706 9 300 15 185 32 78 24 L 37 2807 425 8 144 1705 24 6452 4:45 P to 5:45 P Peak Flour Summary Total 7 1 357 1 6 1 153 9 j 87 1 20 45 19 1 1408 1 187 5 1 72 1 922 j 13 3289 Approach 516 152 _Lj 1614 1007 3289 %HV 1 % 6% 0% 0% 1 % PHF 0.71 0.84 0.90 0.97 0.95 Legend: T= Number of heavy vehicles (greater than 4 wheels) L= Left -Turn S= Straight R= Right -Turn HV= Heavy Vehicles PHF= Peak hour Factor (Peak hour volume / (4*Highest 15 minutes)) For: Citv of Federal Lanes, Volumes, Timings 405: S 356 St & Pacific Hm S 5/1/2003 --I.-- t t Lane Grasp EBL •:_E8 i EBR VVBL WBT V+1BR NB1_ ' . __NE NE 5B!_ 58T- SBF, Lane Configurations ►�, tT tt r Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5 0 5-0 5.n 5.0 5.0 5.0 5-0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Satd. Flow (prot) 1679 1736 1581 1725 1831 0 1718 3315 0 1770 3512 1584 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd- Flow (perm) 1665 1736 1538 1709 1831 0 1712 3315 0 1747 3512 1538 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 282 2 16 137 Volume (vph) 192 271 310 163 329 16 211 '- 439 73 61 -1089 279 Lane Group Flow (vph) 243 343 392 204 431 0 226' 556 0 64 1146 294 Turn Type Split Perm Split Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 3 3 4 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 3 6 Detector Phases 3 3 3 4 4 5 2 1 6 6 Minimum initial (s) 5-0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 33.0 33.0 330 15-0 15.0 150 29.0 15,0 31-0 31-0 Total Split (s) 33-0 33.0 33.0 32.0 32.0 0.0 20.0 50-0 0.0 15-0 45.0 45-0 Total Split (%) 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 0% 15% 38% 0% 12% 35% 35% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1-0 1-0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None Coord None Coord Coord Act Effct Green (s) 27-0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 15-0 48.9 10.0 41.0 41-0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0-21 0.21 0-21 0.21 0.12 0.38 0.08 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.69 0,95 0.72 0.57 1.13 1.16 0.44 0,47 1,04 0.51 Uniform Delay, d1 47.6 50.7 12.5 46.3 51.2 57.5 30.1 59A 44.6 18.4 Delay 48.0 68.5 13.7 47.0 114A 135-6 30.8 58.2 7T6 19.3 LOS D E B D F F C E E B Approach Delay 41.5 02.8 61.4 65-4 Approach LOS D F E E nters.'Gijon..8umMary' - Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 7 (5%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 135 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum We Ratio: 1,15 Intersection Signal Delay: 63.0 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.8% ICU Level of Service F Splits and Phases: 405: S 356 St & Parifir. I-Iwv R 320 Corridore Signal Coordination 5:00 pm 7/1/2002 Synchro 5 Report RT Page 1 FEDERAWA-SX51 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 402: S 348th St & Pacific Hwy S 5/1/2003 bane Group E2L EBT i=BR W8L ►nWBT MR, r48t NaT NBR- S8L SBT BR Lane Configurations tT+ tt r tt r tt r Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5,0 5-0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5-0 5.0 5 0 5.0 5.0 50 Satd. Flow (prot) 1690 3221 0 3276 3363 1550 1661 3376 1523 1762 3495 1538 Alt Permitted 0.950 1960 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1687 3221 0 3260 3363 1506 1650 3376 1480 1744 3495 1490 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 19 67 200 102 Volume (vph) 115 1055 210' 420 1475 88 265 323 206 120 605 145 Lanetroup Flow(vph') 125 1375 i) 452' i586 96 282 344 219 156 786 188 Turn Type_ Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Peru Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 6 Detector'Phases 7 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5-0 5.0 5.0 5-0 Minimum Split (s) 15.0 28.0 15.0 31.0. 31.0 15.0 33.0 33.0 15.0 27.0 27-0 Total Split (s) 15.0 59.0 0.0 22.0 66.0 66.0 26.0 36.0 36.0 23.0 33-0 33.0 Total Split.(°/a) 116/0 42A/o 0% 16%lo 47% 47% 19% 266/o 26°/o 1611/6 24% 240% Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Fill -Red Time (s) 1.0 1-.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Coord None Coord Coord None None None None None None Ac# Effct Green (s) 9.9 54.0 16.9 61.0 61.0 21.0 32.9 32,9 16.1 28.0 28.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.39 0.12 0.44 0.44 0.15 0.24 0.24 0-12 0.20 0.20 WC Ratio 1.03 1.10 1.14 -1.08 0.14 1.13 0.43 0.44 0.77 1.12 0.49 'Uniform Delay, d1 65-0 42.3 61.5 39,5 6.7 59.5 45.6 3.6 60.1 56.0 21.8 relay. 115.6 92.5 121.1 64.5 2.4 132.2 46.4 8.0 62.2 115.3 22.8 LOS F F F E A F D A E F C Approach Delay 94A 73.8 65.1 92.6 Approach LOS F E E F nee"rsectiari: _ Cycle Length: 140 Actuated Cycle Length: 140 Offset: 117 (84%), Referenced to phase 4'EBT and 8:WBT, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 135 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio. 1.14 Intersection Signal Delay: 81.8 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Wilization 106.0% ICU Level of Service F Splits and Phases: 402: S 348th St & Pacific Hwy S 01 Iv` o2 o3 "'11� o4 o5 14 v6 08 o7 320 Corridore Signal Coordination 5:00 pm 7/1/2002 Synchro 5 Report RT Page 1 FEDERAWA-SX51 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 302: SW 336th St & 21 st Av SW 5/1 /2003 taniaxou Lane Configurations►" Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.6 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5-0 5.a 5.0 50 5.0 Satd. Flow (prot) 1754 3327 0 1771 3299 0 1741 3291 fl 1791 3348 0 f4i Permitted 0.138 0.183 0-178 ` ``UN2 Satd. Flow (perm) 255 3327 0 340 3299 0 324 3291 0 491 3348 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 13 30 30 33 Volume (vph) 297 556 65 280 860 198 188 391 101 220 507 142 Lane Group Flow (vph) 334 698 0 308 1163 0 204 535 0 232 683 0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 2 6 Detector Phases 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 15.0 26.0 15.0 27.5 15.0 27.5 15.0 25-5 Total Split (s) 20.0 34.0 0.0 24.0 38.0 0-0 15.0 27-5 0-0 15-0 27-0 0.0 Total Split (%) 20% 349% 0% 24% 38°fa 0% 15% 270% 0% 15% 270% 0% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4-5 4-5 4-5 4-5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1-0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1-0 1.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None Coord None Coord None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 48.8 33.9 49.0 33-9 31.6 21.6 31-6 21.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.34 0.49 0.34 0-31 0-21 0-31 0.21 We Ratio 0-96 0.62 0.81 1.03 0-84 0.73 0.82 0.92 Uniform Delay, d1 24.2 27.3 15.1 32A 23.3 34.6 23.6 36.6 Delay 59.2 28.7 17-0 68.3 39.5 34.8 34.9 42.8 LOS E C B E D C C D Approach Delay 38.6 53.6 36.1 40.8 Approach LOS D D D D jn d sernon.5ummary Cycle Length: 100-5 Actuated Cycle Length: 100.5 Offset: 18 (18%), Referenced to phase 4:WBTL and 8:EBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle. 105 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.03 Intersection Signal Delay: 43.9 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.5% ICU Level of Service E lits and Phases: 302: SW 336th St & 21 st Av SW 01 1 . AI m2 I-� m3 I -. m4 m5 �q � ` 06 If o7 e8 320 Corridore Signal Coordination 5:00 pm 7/1/2002 Synchro 5 Report RT Page 1 FEDERAWA-SX51 TCZ Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. Vehicle Volume Summary Intersection: 10th Ave SW @ SW Campus Dr Location: Federal Way 13623 184th Avenue NE, Woodinville, V Phone: (425) 861-8866 FAX: (z Date of Count: Checked By: Time Interval Ending at From North on (SB) 10th Ave SW From South on (NB) n/a From East on (WB) SW Campus Dr From We SW Ca T 7L S R T L S R T L S I R T L 4:1:5. P 4 45 t3:.-- . 78_ . .. 0 - 0. .. 0- . =0 : :. 2. ..: 0 • ., 279. 32 . 4 .. -47 4:30 P 0 27 0 101 0 0 0 0 3 0 346 31 1 60 4:45.:P 0 28 0... 90. tj 0 0 0:: 8 0 336. 27 1 55 5:00 P 0 18 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 264 24 1 74 5:;t5•P 0 22 17 1.17:'.4.. .. 0.:. -.: - 348 24 4 52 5:30 P 0 38 0 141 0 0 0 0 3 0 350 35 2 67 5:45..P 0, 22 0 110 0 0•: (l 0 1 0 327 33 3 70. 6:00 P 0 35 0 95 0 0 0 0 3 0 367 40 1 52 050 0. 0 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 .. ``. 0 0 0 4 Q 6:30P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.:45. P 0. ..0 0 0 0 0 fl 0• 0 0 0 0. 0 0 7:00P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Survey 4 235 0 829 0 0 0 0 18 0 2617 246 17 1 477 S•nn P t;, e•rih P pnw.4. JA—i-4.�.:�:.;.:.:. Total 0 1 117 1 0 1 463 0 0 0 0- 7 0 1392 132 10 241 Approach 580 0 1524 956 %HV 0% n/a 0% 1 % PHF 0.81 n/a 0.94 0.92 Legend: T= Number of heavy vehicles (greater than 4 wheels) L= Left -Turn S= Straight R= Right-Tum HV= Heavy Vehicles PHF= Peak hour Factor (Peak hour volume / (4*Highest 15 minutes)) Prepared For: City of Federal TCZ Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. 13623 184th Ave NE, Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: (425) 861-8866 FAX: (425) 861-8877 Intersection: Location: Vehicle Volume Summary 1st Ave S @ S 356th St Federal Way Date of Count: Checked By: Tue 2.11.03 FH Time Interval From North on (SB) 1st Ave S From South on (NB) 1st Ave S From East on (WB) S 356th St From West on (EB) S 356th St Interval Total Ending at T L S R T L S R T L S R T L I S R 4;15 P 0 45 18 79 2 6 11 8 1 12 138 35 1 33 89 9 485 4:30 P 0 51 23 96 0 12 11 16 1 13 139 32 2 47 101 14 555 4:45.P 0 60 15 94 0 9 28 3 1 14 161 32 1 32 137 8 593 5:00 P 1 60 10 1 101 0 5 8 12 0 10 154 31 1 41 82 5 519 5:15 P 0 70 26 128 0 9 7 8 0 7 184 38 0 41 103 5 626 5:30 P 1 83 10 127 0 4 11 9 1 14 175 38 1 46 112 6 635 5:45 P 0 76 17 104 0 9. 18 14_ 0 18 182 32 0 37 10,6 9 622 6,00 P 0 59 11 107 2 6 13 8 1 12 138 35 0 34 95 3 521 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45 P 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Survey 2 1 504 130 1 836 4 60 1 109 1 78 1 5 1 100 1271 1 273 1 6 311 825 59 4556 5:00 P to 6:00 P Peak Hour Summary Total 1 1 288 64 466 2 28 49 39 2 1 51 679 143 1 158 416 23 2404 A2proach 818 116 873 597 2404 %HV 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% PHF 0.91 0.71 0.94 0.91 0.95 Legend: Prepared For: T= Number of heavy vehicles (greater than 4 wheels) L= Left -Turn S= Straight R= Right -Turn HV= Heavy Vehicles PHF= Peak hour Factor (Peak hour volume / (4*Highest 15 minutes)) City of Federal Way 1<03001-001 VJ/LJ/LVV14 13:4V VAA L0300141ZU CITY FEDRRALWAY IM003 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT SUMMARY REPORT File: S40903.TM1 # T= 3 % P= 0.75 Peak Hour 51 66 16:55-17:55 Total Entry Volume 14 0 37 1823 1099 y F- 1127 27 T— 39 T=0.7% T=0.5% 601 <— 1079 P= 0.91 P= 0.93 636 8 F) 9 641 6 0 3 F T=% Trucks By Approach 17 9 m �y I P =PHF By Approach T= 5.3 % P= 0.56 LOCATION: SW 356TH STREET AT 13TH WAY S FEDERAL WAY Date: 09/04/03 Day: THU Time: 16:00 - 18:00 Report Prepared for., CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Surveyed By., TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC 626- 120TH AVENUE NE SUITE B102 BELLEVUE, WA 98027 PHONE: 425-688-7888 FAX: 425-688-7784 Report Reviewed by. GC TIME PERIOD -- EASTBOUND T <-i SOUTHBOUND I L) El NORTHBOUND f WESTBOUND ,(— <_ t- ALL 16:00-16:05 0 33 1 2 0 3 0 0 1 1 81 .1 123 16:05-16:10 0 42 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 77 3 127 16:10-16:15 0 41 - 1 3 0 3 0 1 1 1 60 3 114 16:15-16:20 2— 33 3 2 0 5-0-0— 0 0 79 1 125 — 16:20-16:25 0 45 2 2 0 2 1 0 1 2 70 3 128 16:25-16:30 0 53 —1-1-0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 64 6 127 16:30-16:35 0 41 3 0 0 0 0 68 4 _ 118 16:35-16:40 0 31 2 1 0 1. 1 0 1 1 75 7 120 16:40-16:45 1 40 2 _ 3 0 2 0 0 0 2 90 5. 145 16:45-16:50 0 37 1! 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 72 6 120 — 16:50-16.55 0 38 3 1 0 4 0 '0 0 1 63 4 114 16:55-17:00 4 491 1 0 4 1 -0 _- 0 2 89 4 155 17:00-17:05 1 43 4 2 0 7 1 0 0 3 102 3 _ 166 17:05-17:10 0 42 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 84 5 137 17:10-17:15 0 59 3 1 0 3 0 0- _ 1 0 106 1 174 17:15-17:20 1 65 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 89 2 163 17:20-17:25 0 39 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 89 2 134 17:25-17:30 0 54 3 0 0_ 2 0 0 1 2 101 3 166 17:30-17:35 0 55 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 82 _ 2 _ 145 17:35-17:40 1 40 3 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 85 5 141 17:40-17:45 0 52 2 2 0 __ 5 1 0 1_ _ 0 81 4 148 17:45-17:50 1 49 3 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 _ 89 5 151 17:50-17:55 0 54 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 82 3 143 17:55-18:00 1 41 5 1— 0 3 0 1 1_ 1 66 2 122 TOTALS 12 1076 52 31 0 68 8 2 9 20 1944 84 3306 PHF 0.4 0.91 0.75 0.58 0 0.71 0.5 0 0.75 0.45 0.92 0.7 0.96 % Trucks 0 0.7 0 3.2 0 2.9 0 0 11.1 0 0.6 0 0.7 Stopped Buses 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 Rachael Ridge 12/19/03 Enchanted Parkway at S. 348th Street 16:53:42 Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C1P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 -1.0 .0 1.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 174 188 174 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 32 584 298 .0 22.0 24.0 0 2 2 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .89 .95 .93 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3461 3502 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 254 1553 188 12.0 24.0 24.0 1 2 2 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 1.0 .95 .95 .96 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1623 3628 3484 SEQUENCES 44 44 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES NO YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 12.95 24.51 8.51 54.04 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 2 6 5 RT TH LT 196 363 174 12.0 24.0 24.0 1 2 2 .00 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 .0 .98 .94 .99 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1583 3539 3502 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 249 1104 66 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 .00 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 .0 .94 .95 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1575 3522 1796 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 12/19/03 Enchanted Parkway at S. 3'--t-h Street 16:52:54 Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C1P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .81 Vehicle Delay 49.0 Level of Service D -------------------------------------------------- Sq 44 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 **/** ------------------------------------------------- v **** ++++ v North I <+ + +> ++++> ++++ + + + ++++ v + + + v G/C= .108 G/C= .204 G/C= .071 G/C= .450 G= 12.9" G= 24.5" G= 8.5" G= 54.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=15.0% OFF=39.5% OFF=50.8% ------------------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=100.0 sec = 83.3% Y=20.0 sec = 16.7% Ped= .0 sec = .0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 90% Max Group Lanes Regd Used I @C (vph) @E jVolume� v/c Delay S Queue I N Approach 65.7 E+ LT+RTI 24/2 � .274 1--108 �T---1-I--348 I 320 1 .847 1 68.7 I *E+I 238 ft 432 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ S Approach 45.7 D RT 12/1 .238 .204 1 302 8 .025 38.2 D+ 25 ft TH 24/2 .282 .204 1 720 386 .534 43.4 D+ 1 259 ft LT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 24/2 .257 .108 1 348 176 .466 5-1.2 D 131 ft E Approach 55.0 E+ RT 12/1 w.259 .600897^ 974 -^- 841.086 10.2-~�B+ -56^ft^ TH 24/2 .496 .450 1418 1634 1635 1.001 55.4 *E+ 749 ft LT 24/2 .259 .071 1 213 196 .794 71.1 *E 153 ft W Approach 29.4 C ---------------------------------------------_-__-_----_-_-_----------_--------_-------- RT 12/1 .258 .600 868 945 80 .085 10.2 yB+ -54 ft TH 24/2 .408 .450 1 1373 1586 1162 .733 28.8 C 539 ft LT 12/1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .253 .071 1 99 72 .567 59.8 E+ 111 ft -Z- Rachael Ridge 12/19/03 Pacific Highway S. at S. 348th Street 17:02:21 Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 2 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 145 88 115 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 145 605 120 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .89 .95 .93 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 3610 1805 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 88 1475 420 12.0 24.0 24.0 1 2 2 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 1.0 .95 .98 .96 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 3610 3467 SEQUENCES 48 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 20.06 23.15 16.54 36.15 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 9 2 6 11 RT TH LT 206 323 265 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 .00 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 .0 .96 .94 .96 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1583 3539 1805 9.09 5.00 12 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 210 1055 115 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 .0 .94 .96 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3450 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 12/19/03 Pacific Highway S. at S. 348th Street 17:00:16 Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 2 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .92 Vehicle Delay 66.3 Level of Service E+ Sq 48 / 1 North - Phase 1 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 Phase 5 ------------------------------------------------------------- + + * ++++ ++++ +> <+ * <++++ <++++ v **** ~ v **** <* + +> ****> ++++> * + + **** ++++ * + + v v G/C= .154 G/C= .178 G/C= .127 G/C= .278 G/C= .070 G= 20.1" G= 23.2" G= 16.5" G= 36.2" G= 9.1" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5:0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=19.3% OFF=40.9% OFF=57.5% OFF=89.2% ------------------------------------------------------------- C=130 sec G=105.0 sec = 80.8% Y=25.0 sec = 19.2% Ped= .0 sec .0% 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/I g/C j Service Rate Adj HCM L Max Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ILanes+ Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E lVoluimej v/c Delay S �90% Queue N Approach 80.4 F RT 12/1 .266 .178 1 258 1 .003 43.9 D+ 25 ft TH 24/2 .338 .178 1 621 637 .991 86.3 *F 473 ft LT 12/1 .295 .154 1 246 129 .462 51.3 D 197 ft S Approach 71.0 E RT 12/1 .291 .178 1 252 95 .337 47.4 JD 143 ft TH 24/2 .304 .178 1 608 344 .546 49.6 D 258 ft LT 12/1 .330 .154 1 246 276 .989 105.6 *F 421 ft E Approach 57.2 E+ RT 12/1 .266 .444 544 717 1 .001 20.1 C+ 25 ft TH 24/2 .481 .444 1310 1602 1505 .939 45.7 D 756 ft LT 24/2 .316 .127 1 405 437 .991 97.0 *F 346 ft W Approach 68.8 E ---------------------------------------------- TH+RTW24/2^^ .458 .386 925 1 1333 1 1322 .992 62.3 *E+ 741 ft LT J 12/1 1 .294 .070 1 94 125 1 .992 138.0 *F 210 ftf --------------------------------------------------------------- _...__ Rachael Ridge 9th Avenue S.at Current Volumes, S. 348th Street 2003 File RR-C3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 3 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 12/19/03 16:12:24 APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 153 6 357 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 1.0 1.0 1.0 .84 .71 .84 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1611 1787 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 24 24 PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 120 130 GREENTIMES 30.42 11.63 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 9 RT TH LT 187 1408 19 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .90 .92 .90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3545 1805 NO NO YES YES 10 5.24 62.71 5.00 5.00 12 5 RT TH LT 45 20 87 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 6.0 6.0 6.0 .84 .84 .84 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1606 1144 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 13 922 72 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .97 .97 .97 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3603 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 12/19/03 9th Avenue S.at S. 348th Street 16:12:01 Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 3 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .84 Vehicle Delay 58.2 Level of Service E+ Sq 24 Ii1 North I -------------------------------------------------- Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I v v ++++ **** v ------------------------------------------------- G/C= .234 G/C= .089 G/C= .040 G/C= .482 G= 30.4" G= 11.6" G= 5.2" G= 62.7" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=27.2% OFF=40.0% OFF=47.9% ------------------------------------------------- C=130 sec G=110.0 sec = 84.6% Y=20.0 sec = 15.4% Ped= .0 sec W .0% j Lane Width/j g/C Service Rate f Adj HCM L Maxj Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c I Delay I S 19%QOueue N Approach 77.2 E LT+RTI 12/1 I .377 .234 I 341 I 397 4255 I1.017 98.1 I*F 5911 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------ S Approach 113.9 F -I ---L-T-+---R-T---------__---111 -1---I*+I12/1.305.0897404.020 537g--------- 1177 ft ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 59.6 E+ _______--------------------_�___---------__-------------_- 12 LT+RT1 12/1 .271 + .040 1484 1748 1721 11..2088 62.7 I*E+E+l 836 ftI------------------------------------------------------------------------------ W Approach 34.7 C I LT+RT1 12/1 1 .283 I .040 + 1511 11748 974 11.555 .014 1171.6 I*C+l F 128 ftI Rachael Ridge 12/19/03 1st Avenue S.at S. 348th Street 17:08:14 Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C4P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 4 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -3.0 1.0 3.0 -1.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 310 492 184 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .84 .84 .84 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3452 1832 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 183 1309 222 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .97 .97 .97 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3512 1796 RT TH LT 48 272 86 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .85 .85 .85 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3447 1778 SEQUENCES 58 58 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO OFFSET CYCLES 120 130 10 PEDTIME GREENTIMES 7.16 3.06 26.95 16.06 34.27 12.50 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 9 3 2 6 5 12 RT TH LT 103 725 162 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .90 .90 .90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3516 1814 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 12/19/03 1st Avenue S.at S. 348th Street 17:08:53 Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C4P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 4 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .91 Vehicle Delay 73.1 Level of Service E Sq 58 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phase 6 **/** ----------------------------------- ------------ ------- ---- + + + * * * ++++ **** / +> <+ + *> <* * <++++ <**** v v **** ^ ^ v **** North <* + +> ++++> ++++> * + + ++++ ++++ * + + v v G/C= .055 ^^yr G/C= .024 G/C= .207 G/C= .124 G/C= .264 G/C-- .096 G= 7.2" G= 3.1" G= 27.0" G= 16.1" G= 34.3" G= 12.5" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF= 9.4% OFF=15.5% OFF=40.1% OFF=56.3% OFF=86.5% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C=130 sec G=100.0 sec = 76.9% Y=30.0 sec = 23.1% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj 1 HCMI L Max 19Q0u%eue Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vp ) @E lVolumel v c DelayS / N Approach 91.7 F __________________ ------------------------------------ 930 955 84.1 630 LT 12/1 .316 I .117 21 I 179 I 219 11.027 1.023 1125.1 J*F *F 1349 ftj S Approach 70.8 E ________ 02 376 46.6 270 LT+RT 12/1 I .289 .055 I 1 769 I 101 11.526 .031 1160.9 J*D F 1172 ftI E Approach 75.7 E ------------------- TH+RT 24/2 .496 .426 1173 1495 1538 68.3 797 ftLT 12/1 .319 I .124 I 1 187 229 11.029 1.032 1125.8 J*E *F 362 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------ W Approach 49.9 D r�TH+RT I24/2 383^^I^^398 �1016-l-1400 �I �92011.657 ~133 0 J*C ft ILT 12/1 I .307 .096 1 139 180 .034 36.3 F 294 ft i 4 ' Rachael Ridge 6th Avenue S.at Current Volumes, Campus Drive SW 2003 File RR-05P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 4 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 12/19/03 17:11:47 APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 4 6 34 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .69 .69 .69 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1786 1354 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 78 1343 179 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .92 .98 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3564 1805 SEQUENCES 12 12 PERMISSIVES NO YES NO OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 39.88 6.43 58.69 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 7 6 5 NO NO RT TH LT 74 2 59 12.0 12.0 .0 1 1 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .89 .89 .89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 1417 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 78 713 8 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .92 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3511 224 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 9' Rachael Ridge 6th Avenue S.at Campus Drive SW Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-05P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int ## 4 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .58 Vehicle Delay 20.0 Sq 12 ------------------------------------- Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I -------------------------------------- <+ + +> II v North I **** <**** v ++++ v <+ + *> ++++> + + * ++++ + + * v G/C= .332 G/C= .054 G/C= .489 G= 39.9" G= 6.4" G= 58.7" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=37.4% OFF=46.9% ------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=105.0 sec = 87.5% Y=15 12/19/03 17:11:30 Level of Service B 0 sec = 12.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% - Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj _ HCM I L Max 19QOu%eue l Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lanes Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E Volumel v/c Delay S N Approach 27.7 C 25 ft LT +RTI 12/1 240 12/1 I .252 I .332 I- 332 261 I 447 I 49 .1109 I 27.9 C27.0 1+I 55 ftI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach 28.3 C --------------------- RT 12/1 .259 .332 317 537 83 .155 28.3 92 ftILT+TH 112/1 .257 I .332 275 469 68 .144 28.2 J*C C I 76 ft --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 18.4 B TH+RTI 24/2 I .464 I .584 11996 12083 11455 I .699 18.6 J**B 1504 ftl LT 12/1 .023 .054 265 322 195 .606 17.4B 135 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W Approach 20.9 C+ ________ ---------------------------- 21.0 68 LT 12/1 I .264 I ..489 489 11578 11798 I 869 I .082 I 16.6 I B+I 325 ftI Rachael Ridge 12/19/03 loth Avenue SW at Campus Drive SW 17:20:27 Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C6P SIGNAL97/TEAPACLVer 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 6 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 241 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 463 0 117 12.0 .0 12.0 1 0 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .81 .81 .81 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 0 1805 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 132 1392 0 .0 24.0 .0 0 2 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .98 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3547 0 SEQUENCES 13 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES NO YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 26.84 23.68 54.48 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 1 12 5 RT TH LT 0 0 0 .0 .0 .0 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 715 241 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .92 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3560 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 .**,I11040 Rachael Ridge 12/19/03 loth Avenue SW at Campus Drive SW 17:20:01 Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 6 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .73 Vehicle Delay 37.8 Level of Service D+ Sq 13 North I --------------------------------------- Phase 1 1 Phase 21 Phase 3 I ----------------------------------------- * + **** G/C= .224 G/C= .197 G/C= .454 G= 26.8" G= 23.7" G= 54.5" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=26.5% OFF=50.4% ------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=105.0 sec = 87.5% Y=15.0 sec = 12.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane - Width/ g/C N Service Rate Adj HCM L j90% Max I Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I Lanesl Req d Used I @C (Ph) @E Volume I v/c I DelayS I f Queue N Approach 48.2 D RT 343 274 355 112/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I .271 I .224 I 1 I 388 I 144 1 .356 39.8 I*D+l D 186 ftlL E Approach 47.6 D I TH+RTI 24/2 -------------------------------------------------------------------- I .488 I .454 - 11401 - - - 11610 1 - - --- -- 1560 I ------------------- - --- .969 I 47.6 I*D 1710 --- ftl W Approach 18.8 B 2451 2335 200 I ILT 112/1 I .301 I .697 262 I :736 I 53.0*D 1351 ft 1�" Rachael Ridge 12/19/03 Pacific Highway S. at S. 356th Street 17:26:47 Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C7P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 7 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -1.0 .0 1.0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 279 1089 61 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .98 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1623 3592 1814 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 16 329 163 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .92 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1869 1805 RT TH LT 73 439 211 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .92 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3485 1796 SEQUENCES 87 87 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES NO YES YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 5.00 30.21 16.58 26.08 27.13 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 2 9 5 10 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 310 271 192 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .92 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 1881 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 J3' Rachael Ridge Pacific Highway S. at S. ;th Street Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C7P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 7 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .78 Vehicle Delay 12/19/03 17:26:27 66.3 Level of Service E+ Sq 87 ------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 1 **/** ------------------------------------------------------------- v v " v ++++ North + +> <* + +> ++++> + + * + + v G/C= .038 G/C= .232 G/C= .128 G/C= .201 G/C= .209 G= 5.0" G= 30.2" G= 16.6" G= 26.1" G= 27.1" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF= 7.7% OFF=34.8% OFF=51.4% OFF=75.3% ------------------------------------------------------------- C=130 sec G=105.0 sec = 80.8% Y=25.0 sec = 19.2% Ped= .0 sec = .0% - Lane - Width/g/C Service Rate Adj f HCM L Max Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ l Reqd Used I LanesI @C (vph) @E lVolumel v/c I Delay I S 19%QOueue N Approach 63.9 E+ - RT 12/1-Wr348u`-.556 795W-~1903 303 .336 15.9 JB 243 ft TH 24/2 .410 .309 392 till till 1.000 71.9 *E 697 ft LT 12/1 .281 .038 1 45 66 .943 150.0 *F 115 ft -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach 53.9 D ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1001 389 1195 556 8.2 J*Cl 304 l ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LT+RTI 12/1 I .319 .128 l l l 229 11.400 .000 l 116.2 F 361 ft. E Approach 82.0 F 12/1 355 .000 J*D 1255 l ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LT 12/1 l .306 l 201 I l l 335 I 177 �1.489 I 47:1 ft W Approach 71.8 E RT j 12/1 .361 .209 - 1 I 311 1 337 11.000 1 100.5 I*F 1481 ftj i LT 12/1 .314 I .209 I 1 351 I 209 1.554 47.8 l D+l 299 ft Rachael Ridge 1st Avenue S at Current Volumes, S. 356th Street 2003 File RR-C8P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 8 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 12/19/03 17:34:41 APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -1.0 .0 1.0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 466 64 288 11.0 11.0 11.0 1 1 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .91 .91 .91 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1569 1846 1314 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 143 679 51 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .94 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3516 1805 SEQUENCES 16 16 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES NO YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 48.95 10.08 3.88 37.09 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 1 6 12 5 RT TH LT 39 49 28 11.0 11.0 11.0 1 1 1 .00 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 2.0 .71 .71 .71 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1523 1792 1275 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 23 416 158 11.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .91 .91 .91 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1561 1900 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 ,,, ]500� Rachael Ridge 1st Avenue S at S. 356th Sureet Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C8P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary 12/19/03 17:34:08 Intersection Averages for Int # 8 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .66 Vehicle Delay 37.1 Level of Service D+ Sq 16 { Phase 1 - I Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 **/** -------------------------------------------------- v n **** ^ North <+ + +> ++++> ++++> + + + ++++ ++++ + + + v v G/C=-.408 G/C= .084 G/C= .032 G/C= .309 G= 48.9" G= 10.1" G= 3.9" G= 37.1" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=45.0% OFF=57.5% OFF=64.9% ------------------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=100.0 sec = 83.3% Y=20.0 sec = 16. 7% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane Width/ ^^-g/C - Service Rate Adj _ HCM I L % MaxI 19QOueue Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I Lanesi Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E lVolumej v/c Delay S N Approach 34.0 C RT 11/1 .424 .408 478 ------------ 640 512 .800 38.4 *D+ 505 ft TH 11/1 .252 .408 572 753 70 .093 21.9 C+ 69 ft LT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11/1 .366 .408 392 536 316 .590 29.4 C 312 ft S Approach 21.9 C+ ------------------ RT 11/1 .252 408 462 621 55 .089 21.9 C+ 55 ft TH 11/1 .253 .408 554 731 69 .094 21.9 C+ 69 ft LT 11/1 .250 .408 379 520 39 .075 21.8 C+ 39 ft E Approach 43.2 D+ .309 591 874 .804 42.6 I*D+l 503 LT+RTI 12/1 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- .249 I .084 I 11087 123 I 54 I .355 I 53.3 *D 82 ft W Approach 36.5 D+ -RT��- 11/1 .383 421 598 25 .042 23:2 C+ 26 ft 243 TH 12/1 .359 .383 524 728 457 .628 31.8 C 470 ft LT 12/1 .278 .158 1 259 174 .611 50.9 *D 244 ft Rachael Ridge 8th Avenue S. at Current Volumes, S. 356th Street 2003 File RR-C9P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 9 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters O1/05/04 12:01:08 APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 31 7 35 .0 13.0 .0 0 1 0 00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 83 .83 .83 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1438 0 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 50 1110 26 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 97 .97 .97 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3586 1805 SEQUENCES 14 14 PERMISSIVES NO YES NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 38.66 6.12 60.22 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 2 6 5 YES YES RT TH LT 13 1 8 .0 13.0 .0 0 1 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .79 .79 .79 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1488 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 9 556 27 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .86 .92 .86 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3601 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 ..,jI .0, Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 8th Avenue S. at S. 356th Street 12:00:48 Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C9P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 9 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .52 Vehicle Delay 21.7 Level of Service C+ ------------------------------------- Sq 14 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I **/** -------------------------------------- * * * **** <* * *>**** ++++ v ++++ v North <+ + +> ++++> + + + v ------------------------------------- G/C= .322 G/C= .051 G/C= .502 G= 38.7" G= 6.1" G= 60.2" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=36.4% OFF=45.7% ------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=105.0 sec = 87.5% Y=15.0 sec = 12.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane Width/ f g/C I Service Ratel Adj i HCM I L 90% Max Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E +Volume v/c Delay S + Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ N Approach 29.5 C ILT+TH+RTI 13/1 I .263 I .322 I 257 I 460 I 87 I .188 I 29.5 I*C I 98 ftI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach 28.1 C ILT+TH+RTI 13/1 I .244 I .322 I 266 I 477 I 27 I .056 I 28.1 I C I 31 ftl -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 23.0 C+ TH+RTJ 24/2 1 .410502 1643 f 1800 96 f 664 23.3 f*C+l 497^ft LT 12/1 .000 I .051 372 I 438 1 1127 I .062 I 10.8 I*B+25 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W Approach 17.9 B -------------------------------------------- ------------------ LT+RTI 12/1 l .000 .051 1669 1214 631 .144 15.0 B+� 225 ftj Rachael Ridge 12/19/03 21st Avenue SW at SW 356th Street 17:52:45 Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C10P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 10 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 387 0 238 11.0 .0 12.0 1 0 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 1.00 .96 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1561 0 1805 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 276 786 0 .0 24.0 .0 0 2 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .90 .96 1.00 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3462 0 SEQUENCES 13 13 PERMISSIVES NO YES NO YES OVERLAPS NO YES YES YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 34.03 31.78 39.18 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 1 12 5 RT TH LT 0 0 0 .0 .0 .0 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 410 490 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 1.00 .94 .93 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3610 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 12/19/03 21st Avenue SW at SW 356th Street 17:52:26 Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C10P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 10 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .81 Vehicle Delay 55.1 Level of Service E+ Sq 13 Ifl North -------------------------------------- Phase l I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I --------------------------------------- * + **** G/C= .284 G/C= .265 G/C= .327 G= 34.0" G= 31.8" G= 39.2" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=32.5% OFF=63.2% ------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=105.0 sec = 87.5% Y=15.0 sec = 12.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane V Width/ g/C Serve Rate Adj HCMI L Maxl 19%Q0ueue Group I Lanesl Reqd Used @C ( h) @E IVolumel v c Delay J / I S N Approach 56.2 E+ 435 68.1*D+I LT l 12/1 l ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .297 .284 I 196 508 I167 248 I .484 I 36.4 I.930 296 ftj E Approach 66.0 E+ I TH+RTI 24/2µ1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .405 I 327 I693 f 1131 I~1126 I 996 I 66.0 I*E+I 632 ftI W Approach 41.5 D+ TH 24/2 .287 .633 2233 436 191 - 9.2 1133 ft 1 LT 112/1 I .338 I .265 12285 390 541 I- I 527 .974 68.3 IA *E 540 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 21st Avenue SW @ SW 336th Street 12:15:02 Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C11P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 11 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC _00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 142 507 220 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .94 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3463 1805 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 198 860 280 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .90 .98 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3460 1805 SEQUENCES 44 44 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 17.50 26.90 23.65 41.95 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 2 12 5 RT TH LT 101 391 188 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .89 .92 .89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3469 1805 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 65 556 297 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .89 .92 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3537 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 21st Avenue SW @ SW 336th Street Current Volumes, 2003 File RR-C11P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 11 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .88 Vehicle Delay 68.8 Sq 44 / I \ North Phase 1! Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 * * * * * * **** *> <* * <**** v ++++ **** v <+ + +> I ++++> + + + ++++ + + + v -------------------------------------------------- G/C= .135 G/C= .207 G/C= .182 G/C= .323 G= 17.5" G= 26.9" G= 23.6" G= 42.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=17.3% OFF=41.8% OFF=63.9% ------------------------------------------------- C=130 sec G=110.0 sec = 84.6% Y=20.0 sec = 15.4% O1/05/04 12:14:43 Level of Service E Ped= .0 sec = .0% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f Lane Width/I g/C Service Ratel Adj HCM L Max Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILanes Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E !Volume I v/c Delay I I S 19%Q0ueue N Approach 84.9 F 498 LT +RTI 12/1 I .3211 .1335 I 1 209 I 239 .984 109.0 J*E *F 1373 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------ S Approach 61.0 E+ 4TH+RT 24/2 328 207�1 1 705 538 .749 _ 52.8 I -D -� 387 ftl LT 112/1 I .314 I .135 I 1 I 209 I 211 I .868 81.9 F 330 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 70.4 E -- TH+RTy-24/2��-.416�rr.323µYW 489---1116 -1098 I 984Tu- 66.7 I*E+I 675^ftl LT 112/1 I .337 I .182 I 1 + 299 J 304 .927 I 83.8 i F 449 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ W Approach 57.3 E+ _ TH+RT 24/2 345 323r 501T1 1141� 677 593 37.7-I*D+l 414 ftl LT 1 12/1 1 .343 .182 1 I 299 I 323 .985 I 98.4 F 477 ft Rachael Ridge Enchanted Parkway at S. 348th Street 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H1P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS UPSTREAMVC Movement Parameters MOVLA13ELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS 01/05/04 10:42:07 N E S W .0 -1.0 .0 1.0 0 0 0 0 NONE NONE NONE NONE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 187 202 187 .00 .00 .00 .00 RT TH LT 34 629 321 .0 22.0 24.0 0 2 2 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .89 .95 .93 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3461 3502 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 274 1678 202 12.0 24.0 24.0 1 2 2 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 1.0 .95 .98 .96 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1623 3628 3484 SEQUENCES 44 44 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES NO YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 13.09 24.84 8.57 53.50 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 2 6 5 RT TH LT 211 391 187 12.0 24.0 24.0 1 2 2 .00 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 .0 .98 .94 .99 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1583 3539 3502 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 268 1193 71 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 .00 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 .0 .94 .98 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1575 3522 1796 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 a3� Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 Enchanted Parkway at S. 3i�h Street 10:40:18 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H1P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .85 Vehicle Delay 57.8 Level of Service E+ Sq 44 Phase 1 I 'Phase 2 Phase 3 I Phase 4 **/**-------------------------------------------- --- * * * / *> <* * <**** v **** ++++ v North <+ + +> ++++> ++++ + + + ++++ v + + + v G/C=-.109 - G/C= .207 G/C= .071 G/C= .446 G= 13.1" G= 24.8" G= 8.6" G= 53.5" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=15.1% OFF=39.9% OFF=51.2% ------------------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=100.0 sec = 83.3% Y=20.0 sec = 16.7% Ped= .0 sec = .0% - Lane '- Width/ g/C i Service Ratea - Adj HCM L % Max 19Q0ueue Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E +Volume' v/c Delay S N Approach 75.6 E 463 LT+RTI 24/2 .277 I .109 1 352 I 345 I .903 I 76.9 *E 1256 ft � S Approach 46.0 D ----------------- RT 12/1 .239 .207 1 307 9 .027 38.0 D+ 25 ft TH 24/2 .285 .207 1 731 416 .568 43.8 D+ 278 ft LT 24/2 .258 .109 1 352 189 .495 51.4 D 140 ft --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 70.4 E ------------ RT 12/1 .261 .597 890 968 92 .095 10.4 B+ 62 ft TH 24/2 .513 .446 1396 1618 1712 1.058 72.8 *E 791 ft LT 24/2 .261 .071 1 215 210 .843 77.4 *E 163 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W Approach 31.1 C RT 12/1 r260 597 r862 r940 86 091 10.4 B+ 59 ft TH 24/2 .419 .446 1351 1570 1217 .775 30.7 C ft LT 12/1 .255 .071 1 100 77 .602 61.8 119 E+ 119 ft 4f- Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 Pacific Highway S. at S. 348th Street 17:28:07 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 2 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 145 88 115 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 160 652 129 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .98 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 3610 1805 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 95 1594 454 12.0 24.0 24.0 1 2 2 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 1.0 .96 .99 .98 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 3610 3467 RT TH LT 222 348 285 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 .00 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 .0 .96 .98 .98 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1583 3539 1805 SEQUENCES 48 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 19.94 22.79 16.52 36.29 9.46 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 9 2 6 11 12 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 226 1140 126 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 .0 .94 .98 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3448 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge Pacific Highway S. at S. �$th Street 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 2 _ Degree of Saturation (v/c) .97 Vehicle Delay 78.9 01/05/04 17:27:44 Level of Service E Sq 48 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 l Phase 3 l Phase 41 Phase 5 **/** ------------------------------------------------------------- + + * ++++ ++++ 1 +> <+ * <++++ <++++ v **** ^ ^ v **** North <* + +> ****> ++++> * + + **** ++++ * + + v v ------------------------------------------------------------- G/C= .153 G/C= .175 G/C= .127 G/C= .279 G/C= .073 G= 19.9" G= 22.8" G= 16.5" G= 36.3" G= 9.5" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=19.2% OFF=40.6% OFF=57.1% OFF=88.9% C=130 sec G=105.0 sec = 80.8% Y=25.0 sec = 19.2% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane Width/I g/C + Service Rate Adj HCM L 90% Maxl Group Lanes] Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E Volumel v/c Delay � S + Queue l N Approach 93.6 F RT 12/1 .270 .175 1 253 16 .057 1 144.7�r*D+^�^251ft^ TH 24/2 .342 .175 1 610 665 1.051 03.4 *F 495 ft LT 12/1 .297 .153 1 244 137 .495 51.8 D 209 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ S Approach 78.0 E ^' RT 12/1 .295 �.175T 1 248 111 .399 48.5 D 167 ft TH 24/2 .306 I .175 1 597 355 .573 50.4 D 267 ft LT 12/1 .334 .153 1 244 291 1.051 123.0 *F 445 ftJ E Approach 71.2 E RT 12/1 .268Yy~.445 w546 ^^^718rµrrr~7^4^.010 2a 1 C+ _ 25�fty TH 24/2 .502 .445 1314 1605 1610 1.003 59.3 E+ 807 ft LT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 24/2 .319 .127 1 405 463 1.050 113.3 *F 367 ft W Approach 82.0 F fTH+RT 24/2^�H.475 390 948W1 1346 1403 1 76 0 l*E 1781ftl LT l 12/1 l .296 l .073 1 98 l 134 11.042 1.023 145.1 *F 224 ft 2�� Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 9th Avenue S.at S. 348th Street 12:28:27 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 3 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 165 6 384 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 1.0 1.0 1.0 .84 .71 .84 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1610 1787 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 201 1526 20 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .90 .92 .90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3546 1805 SEQUENCES 24 24 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 30.42 11.63 5.24 62.71 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 9 12 5 RT TH LT 48 22 95 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 6.0 6.0 6.0 .84 .84 .84 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1608 1129 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 14 999 78 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .97 .97 .97 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3603 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 9th Avenue S.at S. 348th Street 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 3 - Degree of Saturation .(v/c) .91 Vehicle Delay 76.6 Sq 24 1 Phase 1 ` -__^ IPhase2 fPhase31 `„^ Phase 4 1 **/** ------------------------------------------------- v v ++++ **** v North <* + +> ++++> * + + ++++ * + + v ------------------------------------------------- G/C= .234 G/C= .089 G/C= .040 G/C= .482 G= 30.4" G= 11.6" G= 5.2" G= 62.7" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=27.2% OFF=40.0% OFF=47.9% C=130-secr� G=110.0 sec = 84.6% Y=20.0 sec = 15.4% 01/05/04 12:28:08 Level of Service E Ped= .0 sec = .0% Laner^ Width/ g/Crr� Service Ratel Ad j _^^ HCM I L I Max 19QOu%eue l Group Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c Delay S N Approach 93.4 F TH+RT 12/1 .319 .362 340 583 204 .350 30.7 236 ftLT 12/1 I .388 I .234 1 397 457 1.093 121.4 JC *F 1636 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------ S Approach 132.7 F �TH+RT^T12/1 r287 089^ 1 ~^ 111 83 62 4 141 ft09 .089 1 1 74 1 183 .1162.4 J*E+J F 141 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 LT 112/1 I .3 I I l 11.576 l E Approach 88.1 F TH+RT 24/2 .567 .482 1484 1710 1882 �1.101 88.4 879 ftI LT 12/1 .271 I .040 1 I 48 22 .301 62.9 I*F E+ 38 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------ W Approach 37.3 D+ WrTH+RT 24/2398 - 482 1510 1738 1044 25.1 488 ftLT 12/1 I .284 I .040 I 1 48 I 80 1.601 1.096 1196.3 JC+J *F 139 ftI I .000:2*f Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 lst Avenue S.at S. 348th Street 12:34:29 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H4P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 4 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -3.0 1.0 3.0 -1.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 338 530 198 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .96 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.'0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3447 1832 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 197 1421 239 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .98 .98 .98 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3512 1796 RT TH LT 52 293 93 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .94 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3444 1778 SEQUENCES 58 58 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO OFFSET CYCLES 120 130 10 PEDTIME GREENTIMES 6.90 2.68 25.69 16.51 35.56 12.66 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 9 3 2 6 5 12 RT TH LT 111 787 177 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .94 .96 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3515 1814 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 le Rachael Ridge lst Avenue S.at S. 348th Street 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H4P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 4 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .93 Vehicle Delay 79.2 Sq 58 /I1 North 01/05/04 12:34:06 Level of Service E -FPhase 1 I " Phase 2^ I Phase'3 Phase 4 �� Phase 5 I Phase 6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- + + + +> <+ + *> <* * <++++ <**** v v **** v **** <* + +> ++++> ++++> * + + ++++ ++++ * + + v v G/C= .053 -^r„ G/C= .021 - G/C=.198 G/C= .127 G/C= .274 G/C= .097 G= 6.9" G= 2.7" G= 25.7" G= 16.5" G= 35.6" G= 12.7" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF= 9.2% OFF=15.1% OFF=38.7% OFF=55.2% OFF=86.4% r C=130 sec WH G=1000 sec = 76.9% Y=30.0 sec = 23.1% Ped= .0 sec = .0% RT Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate ^^rr� Adj HCM I L MaxJ 19%Q0ueue Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I Lanes, Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 1Volumei v/c Delay I S N Approach 94.5 F TH+RT 24/2 .385 .257 1 885 912 11.031 186.6 612 ftLT 112/1 I .314 .112 1 170 211 1.029 1128.4 J*F *F 338 ft--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach 75.3 E TH+RT 24/2 .309 .198 1 664 369 47.8 D 269 ftLT 12/1 289 .053 1 65 I 101 11.542 .074 1176.0 *F 1173 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 88.0 F -------- ---------------- 651 80.9 I +RT I1241111.071 11J*F 1 1LT I 12/1 I .323 I .127 1 194 244 1.070 36.2 *F 385 ft W Approach 50.7 D ---------------------------- .409 439 38 .652 32.0 LT 12/1 I .309 I .097 11081 1142 I 188 11.062 1143.8 �*C F 1306 ft 00- 100 OW Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 6th Avenue S.at Campus Drive SW 12:38:26 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H5P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 4 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS' GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 4 6 37 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .69 .69 .69 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1786 1338 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 84 1461 '193 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .92 .98 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3565 1805 SEQUENCES 12 12 PERMISSIVES NO YES NO OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 39.88 6.43 58.69 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 7 6 5 NO NO RT TH LT 80 2 70 12.0 12.0 .0 1 1 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .89 .89 .89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 1394 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 88 777 9 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .92 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3509 166 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 6th Avenue S.at Campus Drive SW 12:38:07 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H5P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 4 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .64 Vehicle Delay 21.7 Level of Service C+ Sq 12 /i, North I 'Phase 1 Ir Phase 2 I Phase 3 ------------------------------------- <+ + +> <++++ <**** v ++++ v <+ + *> ++++> + + * ++++ + + * v ------------------------------------- G/C= .332 G/C= .054 G/C= .489 G= 39.9" G= 6.4" G= 58.7" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=37.406 OFF=46.9% ------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=105.0 sec = 87.5% Y=15.0 sec = 12.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% rr^ Lane Width/ g/C ^- Service Rate Adj HCM f L Max 19%Q0ueueI Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ l Lanes Reqd Used l @C (vph) @E lVolumel v/c l Delay I S N Approach 27.8 C ------ ----------------- TH+RT 12/1 .240 .332 355 l 594 l 15 .025 27.0 I C+l 25 ftl l LT l 12/1 .254 l .332 258 441 54 .121 28.0 C 60 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ S Approach 28.5 C ft 1LT+TH 12/1 l .262 [ .332 270 l 461 l 811 l .175 l 28.6 I*C 190 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ E Approach 20.8 C+ ILT+RTI 12/1 l .041 l .584 .054 l 1996 239 l 2083 291 l 1210 .722 l 20.3 24.1 J*C+J *C+548 145 ftl------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W Approach 21.7 C+ I TH+RTI 24/2 l .367 l .489 l 1547 1716 1 941 1 .548 l 21.8 I C+l 403 ftl LT 12/1 .268 .489 50 69 10 .123 17.4 l B 25 ft V7 Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 loth Avenue SW at Campus Drive SW 12:43:15 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 6 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 241 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 499 0 126 12.0 .0 12.0 1 0 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .81 .81 .81 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 0 1805 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 142 1499 21 .0 24.0 .0 0 2 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .98 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3313 0 SEQUENCES 13 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES NO CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 26.84 23.68 54.48 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 1 12 5 NO YES RT TH LT 13 0 0 .0 12.0 .0 0 1 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1454 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 770 260 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .92 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3560 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 ��� f Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 loth Avenue SW at Campus Drive SW 12:42:58 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 6 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .84 Vehicle Delay 67.3 Level of Service E+ Sq 13 1^ Phase 1^ I^ Phase 2 l Phase 3 l **/** ---------------- ---------------- **** v North +> ++++> ++++> + G/C= .224 G/C= .197 G/C= .454 G= 26.8" G= 23.7" G= 54.5" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=26.5% OFF=50.4% ------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=105.0 sec = 87.5% Y=15.0 sec = 12.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane Width/1- g/C Service Rate Adj HCM I L MaxlGroup ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lanes Regd Used I @C (vph) @E JVolumel v/c I Delay l S 19%Q0ueue N Approach 58.2 E+ LT l 12/1 I .274 I .224 1 388 I 156 I .386 I 40.2*D+I 202 ftl S Approach 32.7 C ---TH+RTI 12/1 240 1 .265-1^--96 I 373 l- -13 l .034 l 32.7 1 C 1^ 25 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 101.2 F ----------------------------------------- -- -- JLT+TH+RTI 24/2 l 549 I .454 1 1301 1 1504 1 1703 11.132 1 101.2 l*F 1775 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W Approach 20.2 C+ ------------ TH�r 24/2 .347 1 .693 2454 r2467 _-837 339 ^^7.5 �215 ftl LT 12/1 l .307 .197 I 1 I 335 ! 283 .795 57.7 J*EA+� 379 ft Rachael Ridge Pacific Highway S. at S. 356th Street 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H7P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 7 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLA13ELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS UPSTREAMVC Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS O1/05/04 16:55:01 N E S W -1.0 .0 1.0 .0 0 0 0 0 NONE NONE NONE NONE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 RT TH LT 302 1173 66 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .98 .98 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1623 3628 1814 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 17 357 176 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .92 -.94 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1887 1805 RT TH LT 79 473 237 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .94 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3484 1796 SEQUENCES 87 87 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES NO YES YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 5.00 30.21 16.58 26.08 27.13 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 2 9 5 10 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 339 293 208 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .94 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 1900 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 ��i Rachael Ridge Pacific Highway S. at S. th Street 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H7P O1/05/04 16:54:37 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 7 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .84 Vehicle Delay 78.6 Sq 87 /I1 North Level of Service E --_----------------------------------------------- Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 1 ------------------------------------------------------------- ^ v v ++++ ^ v ++++ + +> <* + +> ++++> + + * + + v G/C= .038 Y G/C= .232 G/C= .128 G/C= .201 G/C= .209 G= 5.0" G= 30.2" G= 16.6" G= 26.1" G= 27.1" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF= 7.7% OFF=34.8% OFF=51.4% OFF=75.3% --------------------------------------------------------------- C=130 sec G=105.0 sec = 80.8% Y=25.0 sec = 19.2% Ped= .0 sec = . 0 % Lane Width/ g/C Service Rater Adj _ IVolumel _ HCM I L 90% Maxl Group --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lanesi Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 80.2 F RT 12/1 .350 .556 795 903 308 .341 16.0 B 247 ft TH 24/2 .423 .309 396 1122 1197 1.067 91.5 *F 746 ft LT 12/1 .282 .038 --------------------------------- 1 45 70 1.000 170.1 ------------------------------------------------ *F 122 ft S Approach 63.6 E+ TH+RT1 24/2 .335 .398 1007 1388 1 589 ____---------------------- i .424 28.5 J*C 1 322 ftl I LT 12/1 .325 1 .128 1 1 1 195 252 1.100 145.7 F 397 ft E Approach 91.4 F TH+RT 12/1 .361 .201 1 353 398 11.050 111.9 �*F 574 ft l 1 LT 12/1 1 .309 1 .201 1 1 335 1 187 .517 47.6 D 270 ft W Approach 81.3 F RT 12/l� .370 209J 1 311 I 361 11.071 1- 120. 7_ *F 1 516 ft l TH 12/1 .335 .209 1 372 312 l .786 1 58.7 I E+l 446 ftl I LT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/1 1 .317 I .209 I 1 I 351 221 .586 48.7 I D 316 ft J Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 1st Avenue S at S. 356th Street 16:15:28 2006 Volumes with Pipline Projects File RR-H8P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 8 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -1.0 .0 1.0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 502 69 310 11.0 11.0 11.0 1 1 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .91 .91 .91 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1569 1846 1307 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 154 746 55 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .94 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3517 1805 SEQUENCES 16 16 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES NO YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 48.95 10.08 3.88 37.09 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 1 6 12 5 RT TH LT 42 53 30 11.0 11.0 11.0 1 1 1 .00 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 2.0 .71 .71 .71 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1523 1792 1268 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 25 455 170 11.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .91 .91 .91 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1561 1900 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 1st Avenue S at S. 356th .0' eet 16:15:09 2006 Volumes with Pipline-rojects File RR-H8P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 8 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .71 Vehicle Delay 40.7 Level of Service D+ --------------------------------------------------- Sq 16 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 **/** -___ _-_--____ ___ __.._ - / <* + +> <**** v **** ^ North <+ + +> ++++> ++++> + + + ++++ ++++ + + + v v -------------------------------------------------- G/C= .408 G/C= .084 G/C= .032 G/C= .309 G= 49.0" G= 10.1" G= 3.9" G= 37.1" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=45.0% OFF=57.5% OFF=64.9% - C=120 sec G=100.0 sec=83.3% Y=20.0 sec = 16.7% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane Width/ g/C _ ^- Service Ratel Adj HCM L % Max I Group Lanes Regd Used @C (vph) @E ,Volume v/c I Delay I S 19QOueue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Approach 37.8 D+ ----------------------------- RT 11/1 .443 .408 478 640 552 .863 44.1 *D+ 545 ft TH 11/1 .254 .408 572 753 76 .101 22.0 C+ 75 ft LT 11/1 .381 .408 389 533 341 .640 31.0 C 337 ft S Approach 21.9 C+ ------------------------ RT 11/1 .253 .408 462 621 59 .095 21.9 C+ 59 ft TH 11/1 .254 .408 554 731 75 .103 22.0 C+ 75 ft LT 11/1. .251 .408 376 517 42 .081 21.8 C+ 42 ft-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 48.3 D ---------------------------- 087 58 ft 52 LT 12/1 I .250 .084 I 591 11123 I 959 I .388 I 53.7 J *D 1590 ftl W Approach 38.3 D+ -W-`RT _^11/1^ 244 383 421 598 27 .045 23.3 C+ 28 ft TH 12/1 .374 .383 524 728 500 .687 33.7 C 514 ft LT 12/1 .282 .158 1 259 187 .656 52.9 *D 262 ft Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 8th Avenue S. at S. 356th Street 11:59:54 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H9P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 9 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 33 8 42 .0 13.0 .0 0 1 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .83 .83 .83 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1420 0 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 60 1204 28 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .97 .97 .97 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3584 1805 SEQUENCES 14 14 PERMISSIVES NO YES NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 37.99 5.91 61.11 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 2 6 5 YES YES RT TH LT 14 1 9 .0 13.0 .0 0 1 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .79 .79 .79 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5..0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1477 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 10 602 29 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .86 .92 .86 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3600 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 8th Avenue S. at S. 356th Street 11:59:32 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H9P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 9 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .56 Vehicle Delay 22.2 Level of Service C+ Sq 14 I Phase-1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I **/**----------------------------------------- * * * ++++ v ++++ v North <+ + +> ++++> + + + v ------------------------ G/C= .317 G/C= .049 G/C= .509 G= 38.0" G= 5.9" G= 61.1" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=35.8% OFF=44.9% ------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=105.0 sec = 87.5% Y=15 0 sec = 12.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% rLane`r-„ ~r -Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Max1 19%Q0ueue Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f Lanesl Reqd Used f @C (vph) @E lVolumel v/c 1 Delay I S N Approach 30.4 C ILT+TH+RTI 13/1 1�.268 I 317-I--241 I 445H1 101 I`.224 I 30 4-I*C 1115 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach 28.7 C --------------------------------- ILT+TH+RTI 13/1 I .245 l .317 I 252 I 464 I 30 I .064 I 28.7 1 C I 34 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 23.8 C+ .509 675 825 03 33 I LT+RT 12/1 .000 I .049 11352 11416 11329 I .070 I 10.7 *B+I 525 ft1------------------------------------------------------------------------------ W Approach 17.8 B �TH+RT 24/2-` -.318 I509�-l-1683 E1833-_--666 - 363 117 9l B--I-272 ft 1LT I12/1 I .002 .049 144 185 34 .180 16.2 B 25 ft --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 21st Avenue SW at SW 356th Street 16:20:13 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H10P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 10 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 418 0 259 11.0 .0 12.0 1 0 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 1.00 .96 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1561 0 1805 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 304 851 0 .0 24.0 .0 0 2 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .90 .96 1.00 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3460 0 SEQUENCES 13 13 PERMISSIVES NO YES NO YES OVERLAPS NO YES YES YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 34.03 31.78 39.18 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 1 12 5 RT TH LT 0 0 0 .0 .0 .0 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 448 532 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 1.00 .94 .93 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3610 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Ole Rachael Ridge 21st Avenue SW at SW 356th Street 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H10P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 10 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .88 Vehicle Delay 73.3 Sq 13 Ifl North I Phase l l Phase 2 l Phase 3 l ------------------------------------- * + **** ------------------------------------- G/C= .284 G/C= .265 G/C= .326 G= 34.0" G= 31.8" G= 39.2" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=32.5% OFF=63.2% ------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=105.0 sec = 87.5% Y=15 O1/05/04 16:19:55 Level of Service E 0 sec = 12.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane rrrr Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E Volumel v/c Delay I S 19Q0u'eMueaxi N Approach 68.1 E 8.9 *D+I.005 ILT + 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ { .303 I .284 I 196 ' 508 270 �1.527 1 37.2 JF 322 ftl E Approach 92.7 F TH+RTI 24/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - l .425 f --------------------------------- .326 l 692 11130 11224 -- 11.083 --------------- 92.7 I*F l 687 - -- ftl W Approach 54.2 D ---LT^^ 633 2541 477 9.4 14 112/1 I' 361 I 265 12390 I 572 11.209 .057 I 91.6 F 1557 I*A ftl 1 Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 21st Avenue SW @ SW 336th Street 12:19:56 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H11P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 11 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 153 546 237 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .94 .96 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3463 1805 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 213 926 302 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .94 .98 .96 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3463 1805 SEQUENCES 44 44 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 17.50 26.90 23.65 41.95 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 2 12 5 RT TH LT 109 421 202 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .94 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3499 1805 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 70 599 320 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .92 .96 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3537 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 21st Avenue SW @ SW 336th Street 2006 Volumes with Pipeline Projects File RR-H11P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 11 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .92 Vehicle Delay 79.8 ------------------------------------------------- Sq 44 I Phase l I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I **/** ------------------------------------------------- v ^ ++++ **** v North <+ + +> ++++> + + + ++++ + + + v --------------------------------------------------- G/C= .135 G/C= .207 G/C= .182 G/C= .323 G= 17.5" G= 26.9" G= 23.6" G= 42.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=17.3% OFF=41.8% OFF=63.9% ------------------------------------------------- C=130 sec G=110.0 sec = 84.6% Y=20.0 sec = 15.4% 01/05/04 12:19:32 Level of Service E Ped= .0 sec = .0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/ g/C Service Ratel Adj HCM L 90% Max Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lanes Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E ]Volumel v/c I Delay I S JQueue I N Approach 99.4 F LT+RTI 12/1 I .324 l .207 .135 I 1 I 209 252 11.022 1.037 1124.0 91.0 J*F *F 394 ft527 l------------------------------------------------------------------------------ S Approach 62.7 E+ ITH+RTLT I 12/2 I .316 .135 I 1 I 209 215 .885 1 84.9 I DF 336 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ E Approach 86.1 F I LT+RTI 12/1 I .340 .182 I 491 11118 11172 11.048 J*F 299 315 .960 91.8 F 1720 I 465 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W Approach 65.3 E+ I LT+RTI 12/1 I .350 .182 5011 1 299 348 11.613 .061 119.938.2 *DF+� 428 f 514 ft f I-pl, Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 Enchanted Parkway at S. 348th Street 17:30:48 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P1P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 -1.0 .0 1.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 187 202 187 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 34 629 321 .0 22.0 24.0 0 2 2 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .89 .95 .93 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3461 3502 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 274 1687 202 12.0 24.0 24.0 1 2 2 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 1.0 .95 .98 .96 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1623 3628 3484 SEQUENCES 44 44 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES NO YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 13.09 24.84 8.57 53.50 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 2 6 5 RT TH LT 211 391 187 12.0 24.0 24.0 1 2 2 .00 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 .0 .98 .94 .99 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1583 3539 3502 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 268 1198 71 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 .00 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 .0 .94 .98 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1575 3522 1796 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 ,q.j5r/ Rachael Ridge Enchanted Parkway at S. 3'---"'h Street 2006 Volumes with Project File RR -PIP SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 -- Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .86 Vehicle Delay 01/05/04 17:30:28 58.5 Level of Service E+ Sq 44 --------------------------------------------------- 1 Phase 1 f Phase 2 1 Phase-3 I Phase 4 **/** --------------- - ------------------------- * * * v **** ^ ++++ v North <+ + +> ++++> ++++ + + + ++++ v + + + v -------------------------------------------------- G/C= .109 G/C= .207 G/C= .071 G/C= .446 G= 13.1" G= 24.8" G= 8.6" G= 53.5" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=15.1% OFF=39.9% OFF=51.3% ------------------------------------------------- C=120 sec G--100.0 sec = 83.3% Y=20.0 sec = 16.7% Ped= .0 sec = .0% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/' g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Max Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S 19%QOueue N Approach 75.8 E _ _-TH+RT--22/2----328�---207 1-_--713' ^~700----978 +r-75.3--*E---463Wft 1256 LT 24/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .277 .109 I 1 I 352 I 345 I .903 76.9 *E ft S Approach 46.0 D RT 12/1 239 207 1 307 9 .027 38.0 D+ 25 ft TH 24/2 .285 .207 1 731 416 .568 43.8 D+ 278 ft LT 24/2 .258 .109 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 352 189 .495 51.4 D 140 ft E Approach 72.1 E RT 12/1 .261 .597 890 968 92 .095 10.4 B+ 62 ft TH 24/2 .515 .446 1396 1618 1721 1.064 7.4.7 *E 795 ft LT 24/2 .261 .071 1 215 210 .843 77.4 *E 163 ft W Approach 31.2 C ------------------------_ RT _ _ T� -- 12/1 .260 .597 862 940 86 .091 10.4 B+ 59 ft TH 24/2 .420 .446 1351 1570 1222 .778 30.8 C 571 ft LT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/1 .255 .071 1 100 77 .602 61.8 E+ 119 ft y�_ Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 Pacific Highway S. at S. 348th Street 17:24:34 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 2 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 145 88 115 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 164 652 129 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .98 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 3610 1805 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 95 1603 454 12.0 24.0 24.0 1 2 2 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 1.0 .96 .99 .98 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 3610 3467 SEQUENCES 48 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 19.94 22.79 16.52 36.29 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 9 2 6 11 RT TH LT 222 348 285 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 .00 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 .0 .96 .98 .98 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1583 3539 1805 9.46 5.00 12 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 226 1145 130 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 .0 .94 .98 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3449 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 00, 4/1 J*0 Rachael Ridge Pacific Highway S. at S. 3' 1th Street 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P2P O1/05/04 17:24:05 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 2 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .97 Vehicle Delay 79.9 Level of Service E Sq 48 ------------------ Phase 1 --- ----------------------------- Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 I Phase 5 **/** ---------------------- + + * + + * ++++ ++++ v **** v **** North <* + +> ****> ++++> * + + **** ++++ * + + v v -------------------------------------------------------------- G/C= .153 G/C= .175 G/C= .127 G/C= .279 G/C= .073 G= 19.9" G= 22.8" G= 16.5" G= 36.3" G= 9.5" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=19.2% OFF=40.6% OFF=57.1% OFF=88.9% ----------------------------------------------------------------- C=130 sec G=105.0 sec = 80.8% Y=25.0 sec = 19.2% Ped= .0 sec = . 0 % Lane _ Width/ g/C Service Rate - Adj HCM I I L % Max 19Q0ueue Group Lanes Reqd Used ---- @C (vph) --------------- @E JVolume` -------------------------------- v/c Delay S N Approach 93.4 F RT 12/1 .271 .175 1 253 20 .071 44.9 D+ 30 ft TH 24/2 .342 .175 1 610 665 1.051 1Q3.4 *F 495 ft LT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/1 .297 .153 1 244 137 .495 51.8 D 209 ft S Approach 78.0 E ______________------------------ RT -------------------------------------------------- 12/1 .295 .175 1 248 111 .399 48.5 D 167 ft TH 24/2 .306 .175 1 597 355 .573 50.4 D 267 ft LT 12/1 .334 .153 1 244 291 1.051 123.0 *F 445 ft E Approach 72.2 E RT 12/1 .268 .445 546 718 7 .010 20-.1 C+ 25 ft TH 24/2 .504 .445 1314 1605 1619 1.009 60.7 E+ 812 ft LT --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24/2 .319 .127 1 405 463 1.050 113.3 *F 367 ft _ W Approach _ 84.0 F TH+RT 24/2�- .476-1 .390 948- -1346 -1408 1 046- - 177.1 J*E 1 784 ftLT 12/1 .297 .073 1 I 98 I 138 I1.053 1153.9 *F 231 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- e y t. Rachael Ridge 9th Avenue S.at S. 348th Street 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 3 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 01/05/04 17:17:59 APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 165 6 384 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 1.0 1.0 1.0 .84 .71 .84 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1610 1787 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 201 1526 20 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .90 .92 .90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3546 1805 SEQUENCES 24 24 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 30.42 11.63 5.24 62.71 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 9 12 5 RT TH LT 48 22 95 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 6.0 6.0 6.0 .84 .84 .84 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1608 1129 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 14 1008 78 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .97 .97 .97 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3603 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 9th Avenue S.at S. 348th Street 17:17:40 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 3 - Degree of'Saturation (v/c) .91 Vehicle Delay 76.5 Level of Service E r^R- Sq 24 I Phase1 I Phase 2I Phase 3 I Phase 4 **/** --------------------------------------------------- v v ++++ **** v North <* + +> ++++> * + + ++++ * + + v ------------------------------------------------- G/C= .234 G/C= .089 G/C= .040 G/C= .482 G= 30.4" G= 11.6" G= 5.2" G= 62.7" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=27.2% OFF=40.0% OFF=47.9% C=130 sec F-G=110.0 sec^= 84.6% Y=20.0 sec = 15.4% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate ^^ rr`- Adj l _ HCM L I 19%Q0ueue MaxlGroup ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E lVolumel v/c Delay S N Approach 93.4 F ________ 583 204 30.7 236 LT+RTI 12/1 I .388 .234 I 341 l 397 I 457 I1.093 11211.4 J*C F 1636 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------ S Approach 132.7 F ------------------------------- TH+RT 12/1 I .287 .089 1 111 83 �.576 62.4 I*E+ I141 ftLT 12/1 .309 .089 1 74 113 1.119 184.3 F 192 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ E Approach 88.1 F -------------------------------- 82 LT +RTI 12/1 .271 .040 1481 1748 11822 11.301 l 62.9 �*EF+J 838 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ W Approach 37.3 D+ TH+RT 24/2 I .400 .482 11510 1738 1053 �.606 25.2 J*C+J 492 ftl LT 12/1 .284 .040 1 48 80 1.096 196.3 F 139 ft .,�v Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 1st Avenue S.at S. 348th Street 17:14:58 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P4P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 4 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -3.0 1.0 3.0 -1.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 339 530 198 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .96 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3447 866 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 197 1434 239 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .98 .98 .98 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3513 571 SEQUENCES 13 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 38.73 13.69 62.58 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 9 12 5 NO NO RT TH LT 52 293 93 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .94 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3444 193 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 111 796 177 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .94 .96 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3515 1814 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 1st Avenue S.at S. 348th Street 17:14:32 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P4P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 4 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .81 Vehicle Delay 54.6 Level of Service D Sq 13 ------------------------------------- I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 **/** ------------------------------------- v ++++ **** v North <* + +> ++++> ++++> * + + ++++ ++++ * + + v v ------------------------------------- G/C= .298 G/C= .105 G/C= .481 G= 38.7" G= 13.7" G= 62.6" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=33.6% OFF=48.0% ------------------------------------- C=130 sec G=115.0 sec = 88.5% Y=15.0 sec=.11.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% TLane ~Width/ g/C Service' Rate `Adj - - HCM L 90% Max I Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 Lanes l Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay S IQueue N Approach 54.7 D ------------------------------------ 1 TH+RT 24/2 .385 l .298 l 279 l 1027 913 l .889 I 53.3 D l 579 ftl LT 12/1 .394 .298 63 238 211 .818 60.7 E+ 267 ft -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach 123.1 F TH+RT 24/2 .309 .298 279 1026 369 .360 36.1 �D+� 235 ft ----------------- LT 12/1 .691 .298 10 l 43 l 101 11.741 1440.8 *F 128 ftI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ E Approach 52.2 D --------------------------- .481 1 465 691 664 .984 51.4 LT 12/1 I .549 I .481 1196 11268 l 1244 I .887 I J*D+J58.0 E 779 228 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------ W Approach l LT 12/1 l .309 1 .105 .625 l 2121 2198 156 30.2 C 947�I .431 1 112 6 J*B+J 322 ftl 188 .984 18.4 F 304 ft r02- i Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 6th Avenue S.at Campus Drive SW 17:10:16 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P5P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 4 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 4 6 37 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .69 .69 .69 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1786 1325 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 84 1481 193 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .92 .98 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3565 1805 SEQUENCES 12 12 PERMISSIVES NO YES NO OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 39.88 6.43 58.69 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 7 6 5 NO NO RT TH LT 80 2 80 12.0 12.0 .0 1 1 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .89 .89 .89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 1378 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 92 788 9 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .92 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3508 158 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 53' Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 6th Avenue S.at Campus Drive SW 17:09:58 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P5P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 4 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .65 Vehicle Delay 22.0 Level of Service C+ Sq 12 ------------------------------------- 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 **/** -------------------------------------- / <+ + +> <++++ <**** v ++++ v North <+ + *> ++++> + + * ++++ + + * v ------------------------------------- G/C= .332 G/C= .054 G/C= .489 G= 39.9" G= 6.4" G= 58.7" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=37.4% OFF=46.9% ------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=105.0 sec = 87.5% Y=15.0 sec = 12.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% rLane^^y^ Width/ g/C rA Service Rate Adj HCM I L 0Max 1 Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E ivolumel v/c 1 Delay l S 190 Queue N Approach 27.8 C 240 27.0 l ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LT+RTI 12/1 1 .254 l- .332 l 255 l 436 54 l .1123 l 28.0 l C+l 60 ft25 S Approach 28.7 C RT 12/1 .261 `._332-- 317 537 90 168 ~~28.5 100~ft ILT+TH 1 12/1 1 .266 .332 266 1 455 I 92 .201 I 28.9 J*C C 1102 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 21.2 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 495 .996 083 602 .769 20.6 555 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LT+RTI 12/1 I .043 l- .054 11234 12286 112110 I .734 I 25.2 J*C+J *C+ 145 ft1 W Approach 21.9 C+ 1547 47 1765 16 910 410 ft LT+RTI 12/1 I .268 .489 f I .130 17.5 B+l 25 ftl sy� Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 10th Avenue SW at Campus Drive SW 17:06:13 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 6 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 241 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 499 0 126 12.0 .0 12.0 1 0 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .81 .81 .81 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 0 1805 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 142 1499 51 .0 24.0 .0 0 2 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .98 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3543 0 SEQUENCES 18 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES NO YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 26.50 5.25 46.69 21.55 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 1 6 5 12 RT TH LT 28 0 4 .0 12.0 .0 0 1 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .85 1.00 .85 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1478 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 6 770 260 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .92 .92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3556 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge loth Avenue SW at Campus Drive SW 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 6 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .80 Vehicle Delay 49.6 Sq 18 Phase l I Phase 2 �^ Phase 3 I Phase 4 **/** ----------------------------------------- I---------- v **** North <+ +> ++++> ++++> + + ++++ ++++ + + v v ------------------------------------------------- G/C= .221 G/C= .044 G/C= .389 G/C= .180 G= 26.5" G= 5.3" G= 46.7" G= 21.5" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=26.3% OFF=34.8% OFF=77.9% ------------------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=100.0 sec = 83.3% Y=20.0 sec = 16.7% O1/05/04 17:05:10 Level of Service D Ped= .0 sec = .0% r LaneNy Width/ - g/C ^^ Service Rate rr� Adj HCM L Mal Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I Lanes Regd Used I @C (vph) @E lVolumel v/c I Delay I S 19%Q0ueue N Approach 59.7 E+ ________ .221 338 319 69.0 414 I LT l 12/1 l .274 I .221 1 382 I 156 l .391 l 40.5 J*E+J D 203 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------ S Approach 33.6 C ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 I .247 I .263-I---89-I- 375-I---38 I .098 I~-33 6 I -C^I 47-ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 62.2 E+ ILT+TH+RTI�24/2f1 .527^I-.475 11496 11681 11735-I1.032-I ^62.2 I*E+I 760 ftl W Approach 26.6 C+ ILT+RT1 12/1 l .307 I .1800 12101 23011 I 283 l .873 .3139 l 70.1 12.1 J*EB+J 387 ftl------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 Pacific Highway S. at S. 356th Street 16:52:46 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P7P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 7 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -1.0 .0 1.0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 302 1173 66 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .98 .98 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1623 3628 1814 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 17 357 176 .0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .92 .96 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1887 1805 RT TH LT 79 473 247 .0 24.0 12..0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .92 .98 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3481 1796 SEQUENCES 87 87 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES NO YES YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 5.00 30.21 16.58 26.08 27.13 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 2 9 5 10 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 343 293 208 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .96 .96 .96 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1615 1900 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 Pacific Highway S. at S. :�5th Street 16:52:23 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P7P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 7 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .83 Vehicle Delay 79.0 Level of Service E Sq 87 J\ North Phase 1 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 1 Phase 5 f -------------------------------------------------------------- v v ++++ v ++++ + +> <* + +> ++++> + + * + + v ------------------------------------------------------------------ G/C= .038 G/C= .232 G/C= .128 G/C= .201 G/C= .209 G= 5.011 G= 30.2" G= 16.6" G= 26.1" G= 27.1" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF= 7.7% OFF=34.8% OFF=51.4% OFF=75.3% C=130 sec G=105.0 sec = 80.8% Y=25.0 sec = 19.2% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 0 ^ Lane Width/ yg/C^ Serve Rate Adj HCMy I L Max 19%QOueue Grout ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lanes Reqd Used @C ( h) @E ,Volume v c Dela / S N Approach 80.2 F RT 12/1 .350 .556 795 903 308 .341 16.0 B 247 ft TH 24/2 .423 .309 396 1122 1197 1.067 91.5 *F 746 ft LT 12/1 .282 .038 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 45 70 1.000 170.1 *F 122 ft S Approach 70.6 E '^LT+RT -.128Y 1001I 1387 569 .410 28.3 12/1-+ I .327 195Wf 263-11.148 1162.1 F 1 J*C 414 ft E Approach 87.0 F +RT� 390 147.6 5.8 LT12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .309 .201 1 335 I 11.02 187 .517 J*F D 1270 ft W Approach 79.4 E RT--- -12/1 368 ---w==1=I--311 J 3-57�11 059---117.0rI*P 1 510 ftl 305 J 436 - LT 12/1 316.I .209 1 I 351 l 217 .576 48.4 D+I 310 ft r Rachael Ridge 1st Avenue S at S. 356th Street 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P8P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 8 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS UPSTREAMVC Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS 01/05/04 16:46:29 N E S W -1.0 .0 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 NONE NONE NONE NONE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 RT TH LT 502 69 310 11.0 11.0 11.0 1 1 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .91 .91 .91 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5..0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 210 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1569 1846 1307 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 154 756 55 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .94 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3518 1805 SEQUENCES 16 16 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES NO YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 48.95 10.08 3.88 37.09 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 1 6 12 5 RT TH LT 42 53 30 11.0 11.0 11.0 1 1 1 .00 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 2.0 .71 .71 .71 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1523 1792 1268 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 25 459 170 11.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .91 .91 .91 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1561 1900 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 1st Avenue S at S. 356th`,�eet 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P8 01/05/04 16:46:11 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 8 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .72 Vehicle Delay 41.0 Level of Service D+ Sq 16 ------------------------------------------------- I Phase l I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 I Phase 4 I --------------------------------------------------- v **** North <+ + +> ++++> ++++> + + + ++++ ++++ + + + v v ------------------------------------------------- G/C= .408 G/C= .084 G/C= .032 G/C= .309 G= 49.0" G= 10.1" G= 3.9" G= 37.1" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=45.0% OFF=57.5% OFF=64.9% ------------------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=100.0 sec = 83.3% Y=20.0 sec = 16.7% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane _ Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCMy L Maxl Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ l Lanes Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E lVolumel v c Dela / I 1 S 19%QOueue N Approach 37.8 D+ RT 11/1 443 408478 640 552 .863 44.1 *D+ 545 ft TH 11/1 .254 .408 572 753 76 .101 22.0 1 C+ 75 ft LT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11/1 .381 .408 389 533 341 .640 31.0 C 337 ft S Approach 21.9 C+ RT _ 11/1` 253 .408 462 621 59 .095 21.9 C+ 59 ft TH 11/1 .254 .408 554 731 75 .103 1 22.0 C+ 75 ft LT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11/1 .251 .408 376 517 42 .081 21.8 C+ 42 ft E Approach 49.2 D �ITH+RT �24/2r ^^371 I309�l �W592^l 1087 �968 I .891 4,89fu1*Dv�l�557 ft�l1 LT I12/1 I .250 .084 1 123 59 .388 53.7 *D 90 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 W Approach 38.4 D+ ----------------- RT �11/1 .244 .383�TT^421 598 27 u-.45Y� C+ 28 ft 23 3 TH 12/1 .376 .383 524 728 504 .6092 33.9 C 518 ft LT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12/1 .282 .158 1 259 187 .656 52.9 *D 262 ft 40 / Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 8th Avenue S. at S. 356th Street 16:44:26 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P9P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 9 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 33 8 46 .0 13.0 .0 0 1 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .83 .83 .83 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1411 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 14 14 PERMISSIVES NO YES OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 120 130 GREENTIMES 37.99 5.91 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 2 6 RT TH LT 68 1204 28 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .97 .97 .97 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3581 1805 NO YES YES YES 10 61.11 5.00 5 RT TH LT 14 1 9 .0 13.0 .0 0 1 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .79 .79 .79 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1476 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 10 602 29 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .86 .92 .86 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3600 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 C�' Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 8th Avenue S. at S. 356th Street 16:44:07 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P9P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 9 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .56 Vehicle Delay 22.3 Level of Service C+ Sq 14 -------------------------------------- I Phase 1 I Phase 2 l Phase 3 l **/** ------------------------------------- * * * **** v ^ ++++ v ++++ v North <+ + +> ++++> + + + v ------------------------------------- G/C= .317 G/C= .049 G/C= .509 G= 38.0" G= 5.9" G= 61.1" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=35.8% OFF=44.9% ------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=105.0 sec = 87.5% Y=15 0 sec = 12.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane Width/ g/C r Service Rate `^^ Adj HCM L 90% Maxf Lanes Reqd Used I I------------------------------------------------------------------------------ @C (vph) @E IVolumei v/c Delay , S QueueGroup N Approach 30.5 C - ---------------------------------- ILT+TH+RTI 13/1 l .269 I .317 I 240 l 442 l 105 l .235 I 30.5 l*C 1120 ftl -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach 28.7 C ILT+TH+RTI 13/1 l .245 I .317 l 251 I 463 30 I .064 I 28.7 I C I 34 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 23.9 C+ ~� TH+RT 24/2 433 r `509 -1674 -1824- 1311-1-.719 24 2-J*C+^ 536 ftl I LT 12/1 I .000 I .049 I 352 416 29 I .070 10.7 *B+I 25 ft ----------------------------------------- W Approach 17.8 B TH+RT 24/2 .318 .509 1683 1833 666 .363 17.9^ B 272 ft 1 LT l 12/1 1 .002 I .049 I 142 183 I 34 I .182 16.4 I B I 25 ft----------------------------------------------------------------------------- C1.' Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 21st Avenue SW at SW 356th Street 16:37:57 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P10P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 10 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 421 0 259 11.0 .0 12.0 1 0 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 1.00 .96 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0- 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1-.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1561' 0 1805 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 304 851 0 .0 24.0 .0 0 2 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .90 .96 1.00 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3460 0 SEQUENCES 13 13 PERMISSIVES NO YES NO YES OVERLAPS NO YES YES YES CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 34.03 31.78 39.18 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 1 12 5 RT TH LT 0 0 0 .0 .0 .0 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 448 537 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 1.00 .94 .93 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3610 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Rachael Ridge 21st Avenue SW at SW 356th Street 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P10P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] - Capacity Analysis Summary O1/05/04 16:37:26 Intersection Averages for Int # 10 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .88 Vehicle Delay 74.2 Level of Service E Sq 13 /I1 North I ------------------------------------- I Phase l I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I ------------------------------------- * + **** ------------------------------------- G/C= .284 G/C= .265 G/C= .326 G= 34.0" G= 31.8" G= 39.2" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=32.5% OFF=63.2% ------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=105.0 sec = 87.5% Y=15.0 sec = 12.5% Ped= .0 sec = .0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane (Width/I g/C I Service Rate Adj HCM L MaxI Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E IVolumei v/c I Delay S I I90% Queue N Approach 69.3 E ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I LT 112/1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .303 I .284 I 196 I 508 I 270 �1.527 37.2 1*D+I 322 fti E Approach 92.7 F TH+RTI 24/2 I .425 I .326 I 692 11130 11224 I1.083 I 92.7 I*F 1687 ftl W Approach 56.0 E+ 2390 LT 12/1 .363 .265 12541 I 577 11.067 1 --------------------------- 94.5 I*F 557 ft1 Rachael Ridge 01/05/04 21st Avenue SW @ SW 336th Street 16:31:04 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P11P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 11 - METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 153 546 243 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .94 .98 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3461 1805 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 217 926 302 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 1.0 .0 .94 .98 .97 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3462 1805 SEQUENCES 44 44 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO CYCLES 120 130 10 GREENTIMES 17.50 26.90 23.65 41.95 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 2 12 5 RT TH LT 109 421 202 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .94 .96 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3497 1805 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 70 599 320 .0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .92 .98 .94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3536 1805 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 .Lf Rachael Ridge 21st Avenue SW @ SW 336th Street 2006 Volumes with Project File RR-P11P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.121 -- Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 11 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) .92 Vehicle Delay 79.2 Sq 44 1^ Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 **/** -----___------------------------------------------ * * * **** / *> <* * <**** v ^ ++++ ^ **** v North <+ + +> ++++> + + + ++++ + + + v -------------------------------------------------- G/C= .135 G/C= .207 G/C= .182 G/C= .323 G= 17.5" G= 26.9" G= 23.6" G= 42.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= .0% OFF=17.3% OFF=41.8% OFF=63.9% ------------------------------------------------- C=130 sec G=110.0 sec = 84.6% Y=20.0 sec = 15.4% O1/05/04 16:30:27 Level of Service E Ped= .0 sec = .0% rrrr vvLane Width/ g/C Service Ratel Adj HCM L % Maxf l^ Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay S 19QOueue N Approach 98.7 F -----------------===------------------------------------------------------ ILT 12/1 12/1 1 .326 .135 I 24/2 354 1 .207 1 1 209 l 259 11.066 1132.5 J*F 1 405 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------ S Approach 62.3 E+ TH+RT 24/2 .330 .207 1 _~~711 555-1 .767- 53.5 D 397vft LT 12/1 .316 :135 1 209 215 1 .885 84.9 1 F 336 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- � I l f� l l E Approach 86.6 F TH+RT 24/2 .430 .323 490 1117 1176 11.053 1 86.0 �*F 723 ft LT 1 12/1 1 .339 1 .182 I 1 1 299 311 .948 88.7 F 459 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ W Approach 62.7 E+ TH+RT 24/2 .347 .323 501 1141 687 37.9 D+ 420 ftLT 12/1 1 .348 1 .182 1 299 340 1.602 1.037 112.7 *F 1502 ft Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General -Information - - Site lnformation Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period C. V. Brown Wynstone 313012004 P.M. Peak Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Project ID 13th Way SW/SW 356th St City of Federal Way Current Year- 2004 File RR-C12P East/West Street: SW 356th Street North/South Street: 13th Way SW Intersection Orientation: East-West jStudy Period hrs : 1.00 J hff :l v umes.and Ad'us#meats Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume 27 601 8 9 1079 39 (Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 660 8 9 1185 42 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -1 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR ,Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 6 0 3 37 0 14 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 0 1 3 40 10 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R be-layj Queue Len th and Level-of.Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LT R v (vph) 29 9 9 40 15 C (m) (vph) 575 931 146 67 440 vlc 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.60 0.03 95% queue length 0.16 0.03 0.20 3.52 0.11 Control Delay 11.6 8.9 31.3 131.1 13.5 LOS B A D F B .Approach Delay -- -- 31.3 99.0 Approach LOS -- -- D F Copyright© 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1� file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Administrator\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2kA.tmp 3/30/2004 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General -'- ter,' :;.``'S a Infamativn3 Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period C. V. Brown Wynstone 313012004 P.M. Peak Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Project ID 13th Way SW/SW 356th St. City of Federal Way 2006 Baseline Volumes Wynstone File RR-H12P IEast/West Street: SW 356th Street North/South Street: 13th Way SW Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 VehicleNolumes.an&Ad'ustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume 29 647 9 10 1162 42 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 710 9 10 1276 46 ,Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - -- 0 -- - IMedian Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume 6 0 3 40 0 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 1 0 1 3 43 10 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 0 1 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 1 Configuration LTR L T R Ala: air<'e°`t e Lah Z. Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR L T R v (vph) 31 10 9 43 0 16 C(m)(vph) 529 892 122 54 48 410 v/c 0.06 0.01 0.07 0.80 0.00 0.04 95% queue length 0.19 0.03 0.24 5.74 0.00 0.12 Control Delay 12.2 9.1 36.9 247.7 80.0 14.1 LOS B A E F F B Approach Delay -- -- 36.9 184.4 Approach LOS - -- E F Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 l �v( file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Administrator\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2kl Ltmp 3/30/2004 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY lGenerai information I fro mafl Analyst C. V. Brown Intersection 13th Way SW/SW 356th St. Agency/Co. Wynstone Jurisdiction City of Federal Way Date Performed 3/30/2004 Analysis Year 2006 with Project Analysis Time Period P.M. Peak Project ID Wynstone File RR-P12P East/West Street: SW 356th Street (North/South Street: 13th Way SW Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adiustrnents Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 'Volume L 34 T 647 R 9 L 10 T 1162 R 52 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 710 9 10 1276 57 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- - 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume 6 0 3 44 0 18 (Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 1 0 1 3 1 48 0 1 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 0 1 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 1 Configuration LTR L T R ewe 1i th �raiidr - ,e1. ' Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound ,Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR L T R v (vph) 37 10 9 48 0 19 C(m)(vph) 524 892 118 52 47 407 v/c 0.07 0.01 0.08 0.92 0.00 0.05 !95% queue length 0.23 0.03 0.25 7.54 0.00 0.15 Control Delay 12.4 9.1 38.0 351.2 81.6 14.3 LOS B A E F F B .Approach Delay -- -- 38.0 255.6 Approach LOS -- -- E F Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version4.1 z file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Administrator\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k16.tmp 3/30/2004 A PORTION of the S.W. 1 /4, SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 21 N., RANGE 4 E. W.M. , J \ VO , a\ \ \ '1 70' ROW SLOPE EASEMENT S NEEDED l� 6' LANDSCAPE STRIP SIDEWALK RECONFIGURE INTERSECTION FOR / \ � ' ` ` ` LEFT TURN LANE ONTO 10th AVE SW. 6' 18' 3' UTILITY STRIP 29' ROUGHGRADE HALF WIDTI-I FUTURE ROAD & PAVEMENT `\��. GRADING \ \ \\ R SIDEWALK �� k \ UmTS \ 7' ADDITIONAL R.O.W. \ TO �\ N � 0 BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY THICKENED EDGE \�\\\ �\ ASPHALT CURB } / *r,\ ` \� \9. I ; �' \ CA / 6 SAGH ALI E TYP SECTION - 10th AVE. SW - LOT 44 FRONTAGE PARK PD2 Ogg J6" i IVUK CC) EX�STING /_ CONTOUR / / ,�\� C`t ? �\ ��� . \ \ \s Xpz op (TYF�) g•5 �\ kVIVO\ \ IL r . ; 1' TOP WALL- 311. QOT lL ° o 16.0 it ``f p C!T \ �s OEt v a. \ . ILA DSPE + ` \ + \ ', \ \ 1 AIR R \ v SEA RATS PR A A: l j OP WALL: 3,0 \ \ ' B T WALL: 0 J .9 A�Ea X LUh±INAIRE \ \-- �. DR aACIL ' \ �' \ i \Q GRA NG cp O ! `3g6,,, \ '� SHALL'\BE PRO \ � ; \ ' \ ,�� \I � \ 10 �\LIMITS� +\ i \ ? 36 / OT 45 I �y \I \ T WALL 312� \ 6$ �� A14X 1 �� O A \ �i AL �. `BO WALLS. 306. � o � \\ \TOP WALLS: 3 .0 T. 4 \WALLS,\ \ �-• u� \\ BOT 3Q5. \ \ I aLry �'\' i 4 \ `\' 9 RM2400 \ ', � /� I \ T �� ' \ \ fi \ ` \\� \� \ ` \SSM� RiM=288.3 O� \ 5' _ \\ \ "\; = \ NO XSUREMEN1�iJ \ 1 --� o cr� TOPALLS:' 31 \ SAGH ALI E \ \ ROT W 01 JR. HIGH c� r'-------------------J � Via, -- DOUBLE 4 HIGH RETAINING ,.ALES BENCHED 5' APART WITH L� 103'V ), "NOSCAPING IN �n � � p FRONT OF LOWER WALL AND BETWEEN FUTURE, MULTI- MILY `rn ` \ \ \ `\ WALLS. � LOT DEVELOPMEN'<, �, �``, � '13\ _ �� .� �` \ �\ 6 TOP WALLS: 322.0 GiMIT ` �\ \ \t 0 BOT WALLS: 314.0 Ci NORTH LINE GOVER LO 2 j 44"E �96?2' { -� 0 WALLS: 326.0 NM> v7 T �. T P 3� ; • ,G �'� , \\ \ \ I BOT WALLS: 322.0 19 o 40 \ - EXISTIk 3 /. � GONTOU v�v YP) 2 R %� TURN -AROUND TO BE 44 REMO'�ED AND { r CONNECTED TO PLAT o / 1 � j OPOSID >'y I� 26 C TOUR \ \ 3 \ r . Ln 42 41 �6 (TYPE . Ajt rn 2lOdN'\TiALDG. ! 6 4G.5' _ 2' _�67, 1 \ �__� I� j ENVELOPE 4 1 5' DR-NNGE O _ 10�. A '��'_' .�rj5 !` \/ 2 TII E KIT. 72 7` 72 \ 5' z - I.: i 7 ( . t 40 I 3 6 .�'; 5'a 3 '` SF / \ _ -36 AD G 1 LIMITS ` \ \ - -Qo / `\ \ ", -(10 -o ---f N , 70 8 HIGH REINFORCED FILL ROCK WALL �5s" 68 r` / J �2 T`i \ \ �340 OR CONC. RETAINING WALL. 5.4 7 72 f � TOP: 350.0 - -i BOT: 342.0 / r: 3� Ci f S f \ \ .. 'i AJ t 1 � � � � max: i Y (FADING V F �w, LIMITS - ,{ - A13tNG 3 30 TRACT B T 60 67.3 r�, 67. 20I \ LIMITS _ -36 SID DRAINAGE `.� GRAPHIC SCALE TRH .,, _ \ ;^ 3 '10 G J \ 50 0 25 50 1?0 SENSITIW, AREA/ WETLAND,- 310 0 4, ' 28 ,\3s v D \ { % �. \ i ` 1' \ \ \ I \ ( IN FEET \ \ �, NADING 1 inch = 50 > ft. \ \\ 3 , ` ` v 25. ' IST. SEWED EAS ENT I I- - S6---� i `l/ �4 - I k" �`w�...... t A - S :r' � �,, \ �-��-- 67.3 8 7. �' � 107.7' % / 'S�• � A= 2 5 �� �' \ 8 5 44 - - '" 8 �10 ,2.74 S ine f the N 41 G�Sve�nment Lot 2 ��' - !z FND BAR W CAP DRYCO DRYCO TA..S TA 6 v 4 c\ / \ I n37 376 -- 37��� Surveying, Incorporated TA-7 \,o , ICI PLAT; OF ORCHID LANE R S 7.2 \� ono W b �.-B 7 r a .1 R �' . 2 i I 1271 4 VALLEY A1ENUE EAST } I I SUMNER, WA 98390 1 II + 253- - 7 253-826-0300 FAX --------- i _- � - - --- _ � - 1 826 9. 03 11 200 REVISIONS: 1. PER CITY REVIEW 5 20 04 3. ADDED WALLS 8-20-04 4. PER CITY REVIEW 10/20/04 V z LL � W�o z 0)00LQ V N Q L 00 z��N LLJ o Z N L1_ o) � C k W 0) �� V W Q w w z z w S J 7 _ 6 ellvi N���ly1s M b/, a w pFk' Li J CL � z00 V.J C) , O � � Z� Q � J s N c� 0 a a � oho w0(0 � LQ -_j r j O � m w O v a 0 U REsU,q1Vj DATE: 3 14 03 TTED SCALE: 50 NOV 2 4 2004 DESIGN BY: JJJ DRINN. BY: JJJ APP. BY: JOB No. SHEET 1 0 -102630 OF 1 a v A PORTION of the S.W. 1 4 SECTION 19 TOWNSHIP 1 N / , 2 , RANGE 4 E., W.M. "y k REVISIONS: / ! 1 �-' _CONNECTION TO EXISITNG I� WATER MAIN / �_EXISAG TRAFFIC / SI,BNAL (THREE) Ln RECONFIGURE INTERSECTION FOR EXISTING TRAFFIC C \ \ . ' 1� N`� \ LEFT TURN LANE ONTO 10th AVE SW. ' \ • ` Ae SIGNAL (THREE) NEW PAVEMENT WIDENING, 6' PLANTER ��- }� 35' \ �f \ -STRIP, 8' SIDEWALK, STREET TREES / "�1 , N' R CONFIGURE INTERSECTION FOR / \ i ��\��� \ � ; &STREET LIGHTS. �� �`L LEFT TURN LANE ONTO 10th AVE �, 7' ADDITIONAL R.O.W. 25'R 1 �... \ `\ `\\ \\� \N o '\� TO BE DEDICATED TO ad \� j' , \ \ \\�\ \ `� THE CITY NIL 25:1 \ \� �� \ COORDINATE FRONTAGE / \ \ \ \ ASPHALT IMPROVEMENTS/TAPERS WITH '/ f \� \ \ DEVELOPERS OF CAMPUS CREST O o \ _X -SAGH ALI E TAPER r \\ 9 .�� \ � �. �� �\ �, ROJECT TO j 'j 1 o ��\ `� \ V SEWER CONNECTION 4 l PARK \ / �9;, \' \' ���\.��\ \ EXISTING SEWER MAIN c I 1 WITH NEW MAN HOLE \ ``� \ s Oi'p 10 A h i 5425 SF %'` �\� \ T 2) IM 784 f �J \\\ .DQ'A,(� /``'\ li , • �5,5I, M . \ IE CI \ \ \ C S=2 I \ p<o �2 p'S� 15 CO C E=280.2 66. �`�.� . `ram` \ Sly \AI\ NO MLA�)UREMENT NEW PAVEMENT WIDENING, 6' PLANTER �I _ STRIP, 8' SIDEWALK, STREET TREES I ;F v�r \ \ �` \ \ TR T LIGHTS. o �Q \ i \ & S EE :p SAD CELL MH 4 �005F .0' \ ` 12 CB 7' ADDITIONAL R.O.W. �f l i \ \ \ , \ �. I i I I WET} AND. \ \ \` '.. TO BE DEDICATED TO I' �s THE CITY J I II v 97' \ I CELL, v\ �� i \ 1 {{ �\ COORDINATE FRONTAGE %1/ \ -' 1 \ ( \ \ �� ` / IMPROVEMENTS/TAPERS WITH \\NA1'6R R ��� DEVELOPERS OF CAMPUS CREST SE�ARATt,, PR1y(A t ; ! - ( I I `,0 TEL. ' OmAIRE � PROJECT TO DRAINAGE KACIL1�71E \ t 1' 3 +, , I '' d? �6 o CB A. O ( , 6 SHALL BE PROVidE hVOR 6246',SF: \ ,\ ��� \ •� TOT 45 2>R \ \ `- .\ • I \� \ \\ \\ \ \ \ 368 64 o r _ 144'�IG[vAX�; \\ INTERSECTION / CB �'o \. T.L. 4` ALPHA � 53 SF I EX13� sTo M ��:'�d CH AN N ELI ZATON S L d I \� V ^~� TAPER Sri 1 4 2 \ I BRAIN FROM \ \ P'E 7267 SF `" \ \ \ OkHID LANE\ �N �\ SCALE: 1"=50' \ �� 0 \` ( \ \ \_ `\ \ \ SSM ftIM=288.3 0\ \ \ \ 146' \ / \, NO MASUREMENI��, ,\ 5�0 SF'\ r,R� \ j 'N l \ \,\ 7 237 SF \\\ I \ \ o DRAINAGE TRACT A ���� 334 SF v y :�,► , ` -:�, o 530 F • ,r, \ s I _, 1 \ rn \ i `' 57 \\ \ I \ \ SCALE: 1'=20' i" i \ W 4 0 1 �� \ \\jI %\ C> 6) 5 \ 116 FUTURE MULTI -FAMILY "\ / t 134 V '�� i'' LOT DEVELOPMENT • _ r---\- - =� ` I r M, �� -'10 ,n \ 5�00 F i i R S 1.2 ---376- -_ _ 1� o iO3 -- - -_ - - -- - -- - - - ^ - - - - - - -NORTH LINE GOVERNMENT LOT 2 1 ; _ 44^E �$ �' ; 5300\\SF , r \ _ ` -- 4 0 260. ,, In M •-�5•�' �..� �G _ 1 03 ' \I / ! S 2 46.1 �56 S`F h I CO `1 :;\ t Z ` LUMINAIRE ; • \ 75i1 SF H [* \ TURN -AROUND TO BE �"� CB \o� 7 +' \ REMOVED AND - 200 SF-- \ -}- \ LIGHT J-BOX CONNECTED TO PLAT . \ \ CB RIM=355. 6 ` C v TIE 1 ADS=351.41 ~�'�� // / ! 44 % \��' \ IE 12" ADS NE=353.00 �/ ! r' e� ( v v, .w t9 I 12" AD ESE=35L51 / / 1 11117 ` F 8�, \ 10042 SF `n 4 2 in cp 7516 SF 7245 SF 6 25'R - / I 7445 SF` / ! S R 27 SF V AV ��� �14 g9 40. 5' 7 b C6 � - -�' \ --._ I 15 R A GE o \ \ ( \ \ \ p�F A� i l _. 2 - 67' _ 107'.7' �� . \�/ \� I E MT.} /C RA --,_..._ �0\�>,� e�6� I �72' 72 \\ 72 72' \ 5'R CB \ \ AND / . I IST.,15' . DRAINAGEe 0 3 j y' O- \ \ I r' UFNT (REC NO CELL 1:.. SEDIMENT CELL TOP AREA: 676 SF ® EL: 364.0 d (� BOTTOM AREA: 100 SF ® EL: 360. ° l VOLUME: 1552 CF SPILL CONTROL ° CB STRUCTURE a L o T /\ INLET 1 33 DISPERSAL LOT TRENCH ? \ / / LO 166 0 `��' '�• 32 / WETLAND CELL 364 SE SURF AREA WATEF LEVEL: 364' BOTTOM: 362' - TRACT G ^� 1� ,s£w£R WETLAND BUFFER es4f \\ \� NN c 1, PER CITY REM W-12 10, 0 2. PER CITY REVIEW 5 20, 04 3. PER CITY V z IQ) [jj o� lq- W�r-) o z O 0) p a0 1 L0 - V z N � � N r-. 0) a (w W a W w z z Lk, to N U cnv�6.P (n LAJ C)Lli CC ��-- LLJ W Qn Q LL Q 0 a 0- j` f ( v A3 2 020 0 0�9) ( 7480 + t�i i I � � B _ C I 25'R _ 2F �SF� t _ i �00� 4 00 '. r V C I ## 1 ).7 / 4 C �. `\ 40 ( I U) N rn o TURN -AROUND • I 1 i' ` 3 6 r 720o SF 3 8 3 7871 SF I-- DRAINAGE TRACT B z ©o �_ TO BE s fi ` 01 7200 SF of \ 7200 SF I H ( `� `� °' \ > LL,00 1 co 29 \ AND/ y �REMOVED 7316 SF o C8 L , - CONNECTED 0) TO PLAT 62 - 72' 72' \' 25.4' 1� � \ 7200 `5F � ��` , �\ � _---_.. _..; 34� LEGEND ..s ►- � � � LO CL 4 TRACT `N �� C ! _ 3�4 v O � ,� _ NDS APE �0p o MH S VV 34Wth �p \ _ -- 3 8" SAN. SEWER MAIN s I 77'69 SF o S I\ \ 10 1; �~ I y 278 NSF M \ �.�' �6 •Q O o L, �3 CB CBI ---.__:.__ 200 SF __ ` S18 8„ WATER MAIN �4 `� CL H \ � _. �C C Li L \ - r\ �0 721$ SF \ 3So z M W 50 EXIST \ - \ % 36 - '12" STORM DRAIN oEA �' 6067.3 Sf`bINA o 673, 26 7.3 6 .3 , ^ ' �J 'r0\ \ o _._.moo_ - „\ \� \3S STREET LIGHT a T R A C; \ G �,�' 3 I \ ! - - 7soo s -- --- I i �,, §-' �' \ \ '3 GRAPHIC SCALE 2I SENSITIVE 'AREA i I / \ _ 7249 F I \ I't) `��= ��4 f 1. 2 S� I \ S� c� / 472 SF \ \ I �\ 50 0 25 50 00 200 - J Q �1 30� o I�i 29 I - 1 WETLAND o, m - I 3S DATE: 3 14 03 c A A 7201 SF oI -7201 SF i 28 1 `� r �� ` • 16444 SF J \ 8 \ \ \" aI '' 01 SF 2 7 ,�� S6 50' 20 SF 7� '� I % I D SCALE j726 SF ( IN FEET) r CB t 6 1. i.-------------------- 368 �� ^� r' j \'' �' \ 24 \ 3�� \ 3� nc - t. I.s�II�E DESIGN BY. JJJ 25. ' EXIST. WER EAST ENT 67.3' I S j ^� % S 11�00 S� .v vv I �� C, 67.3' 8 7. 107.7' % / 1j�j' I \ 4�}I.� NOV 2 4 2004 DRWN. BY: JJJ TA -2 TA-3 �' �� v, ` t'� " ... ... . \ \3. v`6 og AS ---- �, J 1 $ 5$ 44 E 1 74� , S ine f the 41 Gbverhment Lot 2 �. APP, BY: I 7A-4`- �O S66 366 `3� 3>_ \ ! I I ` 1 j DRYCO �� TA -6 ✓' Q �378 _r j / , \ \ I ND` �EBAR W/CAP DRYCO ' =� 55 C I N 1 376 _ \ LS 18�2 - JOB No. jy \ EXIST. 15 SAN SEWER '� C) 371 372 -� / \ \ �\ \ I 10' N Surveying, Incorporated I T i TA-7 10 EASMENT (REC. 0• (� I I icy c \ \ \ 10.. W o 9 �^ 20010312000348� C % I I PLAT OF ORCHID LANE %� ^ �� R S 7 � 2 & 1 1 0 12 71 4 VALLEY AVENUE EAST 34145 TA-8 TA- 9 R J / 2 ( ( "�'� � >� 5 8a1sr8[� dad TA-11 2 0 1 21 I o I SUMNER, WA 98390 �'AL• LAN )i 1 , ► 253-826-0300 FAX 253-826-9703 Asa/11 SHEET ®f " OF i DATUM ELEV 380.00 4 f r to N PVI STA = 3+68.25 PVI ELEV = 376.66 A.D. _ —6.90 K = 14.49 100.00' cd b + 05 W vw (0 (0 ri r � M w w LOW POINT ELEV = 3 9.02 + M LOW POIN STA = 1+ 7.59 U 2,00q, PVI TA = 1+65 cii > PVI EI.EV = 358.57 > m m r'' = 5.05 — - - �- ,r. / 5.00' VC U .0 uN, T 00 0 0) Q � N rn + O M b�c QII M rn LJ + W + M N cii U w LJ m m 0 >0Q �O r`(0 r`m- Nui 17(0 ��OQ >tn f7tf) MM �(0 �n M M 1 +00 2+00 S+VU %I-UU 13th COURT SW SCALE: 1" = 50' HORZ. 1" = 5' VERT. ii PM STA = 1 +50 PVI ELEV = 347.36 A.D. _ — 5.86 K = 5.12 360 350 340 330 320 31C DATUM ELEV 305.00 ' vc V) .0 Lo M NM00OD a)QM''" M � U U \ w >uj Doi; PVI STA = 5+61 7 PVI ELV=315.00 \ ,9 A.E. = 5.86 \ K=13.5 0.00' VC N QO a +�+ N > r: Q V)M N 0° III + + w L0 U w r� �i>� M� r`� Lnij oo� �� o� 1700 oN r�N )� �� MM d 0 �r N� ONM MM r) M ro � r7 toto f7 M r� 04 1 +00 2+00 3+ 00 4+00 12th PLACE SW SCALE: 1" = 50' HORZ. 1" = 5' VERT. 5+00 550 540 530 ,- 14,q3 p ry and W7P0� t 320 ME REVISIONS: 1. PER CITY �J z w N o�ato dt Q � o Lo z c x Q z � Q 0- � ono Z r.. Lw 0) m rn .. � �...�Lor• 0 Q, N 4 w Q mox 0 C� Qi° W m i U d z O U DATE: 12 14 03 SCALE: 1 "= 50, DESIGN BY: JJJ DRWN. BY: JJJ APP. Br. JOB No. JAN 0 2 2004 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SHEET ti BUILDING DEPT, OF ..,I NW CORNER 13 18 SECTION 19 CONC. MON. IN CASE 24 19 I I GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=50' I 0 50 100 150 �D) DEED M) MEASURED OR CALC'D FROM MEASURED I THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SAID PORTION BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: I COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF SOUTH 89'00'18" EAST 335.78 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01*35'16" WEST 42.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8501170665, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN SOUTH 89'00'18" EAST 18.07 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 658.00 FEET; I THENCE EASTERLY 700.54 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 60 '59 '59'; THENCE SOUTH 28 '00 ' 19 " EAST 422.43 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING AND THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 842.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTH- EASTERLY 217.49 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14'47'59" TO A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 47'11'42" WEST; THENCE LEAVING SAID MARGIN ALONG THE NON -TANGENT EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT SOUTH 01'13'12" WEST 390.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT NORTH 88'59'20" WEST 561.92 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 897.03 FEET (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 74'48'34" WEST; THENCE NORTHERLY 732.77 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE I THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 46'48'15" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING NORTHERLY OF A LINE BEGINNING ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID I GOVERNMENT LOT AT A POINT 412.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EAST TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT: EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 264.00 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE SOUTH 89'27'31" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 264.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89'27'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 296.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21'47'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 122.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70'08'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 83.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 53'44'33" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 164.46 FEET; THENCE NORTH 36'15'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 44.74 FEET TO THE v BEGINNING OF A 340.00.FOOT RADIUS CURVE THE CENTER OF WHICH ti BEARS SOUTH 53'44'33" WEST, THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05'00'38", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 29.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01*06'36" EAST PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 183.39 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; Iz TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH 30 FEET OF THE WEST 264 FEET OF THE NORTH 412 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. I I I I I I I NW Corner SW/4 NW/4 Section 19 7\— S88'58'44"E 562.64' 264.01'� — — S88'58'44"E 29822'-- — - Iiu�. ry�0� -h I I 2 I I I I I I I I I W/4 CORNER SECTION 19 19 CONIC. MON . LEAD & TACK AIU:� DRY.CO DRYCO Surveying, Incorporated 12714 VALLEY AVENUE EAST 98390 253-826-9703 SUMNER, WA 253-826-0300 FAX ens Y.o'AA"C �cn ni SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT. S?,L-"x 6- 23 -a3 G. PHIL SARGENT P.L.S. 34145 Revisions: Date I By I Chkd Wyn B o u rat 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAv __�juwllvu DI -PT DRAWN SCALE: 1" = 5 DATE SURVEYED: April, 2003 APPROVED: DATE PRINTED: 6/24/2003 JOB No: 2003C '7 C IV2ky1��[.P►�I 00 SIGNAL PHASING DIAGRAM EX M11 PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT SIGNAL FACE SCHEDULE R O 12" R 12,, R O 12 Y 0 0 Y 12" Y 12 G 0 0 PEDESTRIAN HEAD NO. G 12" G O 12 Y 12" 64, 65, O O EX. 23, 24, HEAD NO. HEAD NO. 43, 44, 84, 11 51, 52 G O 12" 85 63, 81, 82, 83 EX. 21, 22, 25, HEAD N0. 41, 42, 62 45 NOTES: 1. ALL VEHICLE SIGNAL HEADS SHALL HAVE BACKPLATES AND TUNNEL VISORS. 2. ALL VEHICLE SIGNAL HEADS ON MAST ARMS SHALL USE TYPE M MOUNTING, EXCEPT HEAD 63 SHALL USE TYPE N MOUNTING. 3. ALL VEHICLE SIGNAL HEADS ON POLES SHALL USE TYPE K MOUNTING, EXCEPT HEADS 52 AND 83 SHALL USE TYPE H MOUNTING WITH A 45° POLE ATTACHMENT POINT ANGLE. 4. ALL PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL HEADS SHALL USE TYPE E MOUNTING. 5• ALL SIGNAL HEADS SHALL BE LIGHT EMITTING DIODES (LED). PREEMPTION SCHEDULE --► PROTECTED VEHICLE MOVEMENT PERMISSIVE VEHICLE MOVEMENT OLA OVERLAP A (04, 01 SB RIGHT TURN) SW CAMPUS DRIVE 12+00 6A5 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WIRING SCI CHANNEL PHASE(S) A 2+5 B 4 C 1+6 D 8 .QUIRE Run Raceway/ Conduit Preempt Veh/Ped Veh \ ower Ilumination e 2CS 3C(SH) 8C 5C 5C #8 #8 1 2" 1 2 2» 3 3 MASTARM* 1* - 2 4 2"* 1* 1 2 5 2,>* 3 1 * 1 6 MASTARM* 1* 7 MASTARM* 1* 1* 8 MASTARM* 2* 2 9 2 "* 1 3 1 3"* 6* 2* 1* 1*, 4 2* 10 2 "* 3 1 1* 2 11 MASTARM* 1 12 MASTARM* 3"* 2* 13 1.5"* 2* 3 14 1.5"* 4*, 2 15 MASTARM 1 16 MASTARM 1 1 17 MASTARM 1 2 2" 1 2 3 18 2" (SPARE) - 2"* 4* 2* 19 2"* 2 1 2 3 3"* 4*, 2 3*, 1 1* 1 *, 2 2* 3"* 10* 1* 1* 2* 1* 20 2»* 3 1 4 2 1.5"* 1 2* 21 1.5" 1 * 1 22 1.5" 1 *EXISTING 11 +00 e 0 Z) W Q FF-- O II D O ❑! D o ! DD D A X4B 4, DII / / II 1 / D D 0 LEGEND EXISTING EXISTING NEW* TO BE REMOVED TO REMAIN - - -�> ► VEHICLE SIGNAL HEAD =-► PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL HEAD y LIGHTING AND MAST ARM STANDARD LIGHT STANDARD �v ® TYPE 1 SIGNAL POLE TYPE 1 JUNCTION BOX, J-1 1 a 0 TYPE 2 JUNCTION BOX, J-1 1 a z TYPE 3 JUNCTION BOX, J-1 1 a ! -- PRE( MPTION DETECTOR (EVPE) - - CONDUIT CONTROLLER CABINET SERVICE CABINET EXISTING NEW* D4 O O O Al O WATER VALVE GAS VALVE IZ L) co rn ~ HYDRANT C9 CS, 0 q- , r- CATCH BASIN 20 0 20 40 W U? rn N N MANHOLE Q Li 0 TIMBER UTILITY POLE scale feet Q � INDUCTION LOOP O z z VEHICLE DETECTOR N g CONSTRUCTION NOTE Q Z E WIRE NOTE o Y SIGNAL STANDARD NO. AND NOTE �� 03\;�AS cp �-Y�� 2 N o U O � Q c6c7 Z/ z (D 0� D / \ O z w �� W z z z z - a a cD / \ 0� J z Haw _ 4B1 4A1 o + �17 � / I 181 > 82 _- PA D D 20 i B3 � �A4121 .. _ � i� � � (.�,. �� I 19 I �2B1 i22 2B2 15 I2A3 19 15 18 V_C EV-A1 � 7_ � w ' 50 - -- cA r I 51 - 00 -- 20 17 24 N Z O 00 -Z Z 0 1-3 rCO r_v -SW CAMPUS DR z 6, STATION 10+00 = rn 10TH AVE SW -)3 STATION 1D+00 �0 -- — Z (T1 0 Z�ZG �2� ! m Z cf-Z r �� m r ��� I 1+07.v5 a---- - Q 6A s� 62 22 _ o - I M 18 2 6B 42 > 41 S �-.. - - NTING I I _ 6B2 43 w 63 �— - - -NE P_ _ i - - I - \ D EXIST. SIDEWALK > 10 ° _� - 11 INSTALL THERMOPLASTIC CROSSWALK LINES PER PER CITY OF FEDERAL O 8 WAY AIL DRAWING STANDARD DETAIL R NG NO U F D N .JJ \° g 12 INSTALL 18 STOP LINE PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARD DETAIL W 6 7 CONSTRUCTION NOTES Q 2 // O INSTALL SIGNAL HEAD ON EXISTING SIGNAL STANDARD MAST ARM. DRAWING N0. 3-20. Lv ° 12 4 3 REMOVE EXISTING STREET NAME SIGN AND REPLACE WITH D3-302 Q S I ! A3 6 I 1 0 1 , + N 1 i I 1 I c T�A s yaw \ [ STREET NAME SIGN. 13 EXTEND EXISTING 18 STOP LINE PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY U 2 STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING NO. 3-20. � REMOVE EXISTING VEHICLE SIGNAL HEADS AND INSTALL NEW VEHICLE W - 14 OVERLAY EXISTING TYPE 2L PAVEMENT ARROW WITH TYPE 3L �. SIGNAL HEADS AND 30 X36 R3-5R SIGN ON EXISTING SIGNAL PAVEMENT ARROW PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARD DETAIL I °1, STANDARD MAST ARM. INSTALL VEHICLE SIGNAL HEADS, PREEMPTION DRAWING NO. 3-21. 1 DETECTOR, PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL HEAD AND PUSH BUTTON ASSEMBLY ON �1 °1 EXISTING POLE, 15 INSTALL TYPE 2L PAVEMENT ARROW PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ,A 1 STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING NO. 3-21. t 4 1 3O REMOVE EXISTING 5-SECTION VEHICLE SIGNAL HEAD, R10-12 SIGN 1 1 1 AND STREET NAME SIGN. INSTALL NEW VEHICLE SIGNAL HEADS AND 16 INSTALL 4" WHITE EDGE LINE PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARD 1 - D3-302 STREET NAME SIGN ON EXISTING SIGNAL STANDARD MAST DETAIL DRAWING NO. 3-17. LLJW o; L0 N ARM. INSTALL PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL HEAD AND PUSH BUTTON !-- �, z n O � z 00 1 ASSEMBLY ON EXISTING POLE. 17 INSTALL DOUBLE YELLOW CENTER LINE PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY = W N STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING NO. 3-17. � � N 1 O4 CONSTRUCT FOUNDATION AT 10TH AVE SW STA 0+37, 28.5 LT. � o INSTALL TYPE III SIGNAL STANDARD, VEHICLE SIGNAL HEADS, 1 g INSTALL LANE LINE PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARD DETAIL o 0 �+ PREEMPTION - O - 0� d o O N � \ , DETECTOR, 30 X36 R10 12 LEFT TURN YIELD ON DRAWING NO. 3 18. o � O m� GREEN BALL" SIGN, D3-101 "SW CAMPUS DR" SIGN, TERMINAL > Q �` CABINET AND 250W HPS M-C-III LUMINAIRE WITH PHOTOCELL AT 35' 1 g INSTALL WIDE LINE PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARD DETAIL v o = \ `Ltj DRAWING NO. 3 18. RESUBMITTED co MOUNTING HEIGHT ON 8 MAST ARM. I z C/) INSTALL 6' TYPE 3 INDUCTION LOOP VEHICLE DETECTOR PER WSDOT 20 REMOVE EXISTING LANE LINE. AUG 2 2 2006 o Q \ STANDARD PLAN J-8c. CITYOP FEDERAL WAY' a \\ \ 21 REMOVE EXISTING DOUBLE YELLOW CENTER LINE. BUILDING DEPTP \ O INSTALL 6' TYPE 3A INDUCTION LOOP VEHICLE DETECTOR PER WSDOT o A STANDARD PLAN J-8c AND CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DRAWING NO. 3-44. 22 INSTALL CONDUIT INTO EXISTING JUNCTION BOX. PULL EXISTING 3C(SH) BACK INTO JUNCTION BOX, THEN REROUTE THROUGH NEW DATE: 08 15 06 ` \� \ CONDUIT TO RELOCATED PREEMPTION DETECTION ON NEW LIGHT ►� ` 5 C77 EXISTING LIGHT STANDARD, LUMINAIRE, CONDUIT AND WIRING TO BE STANDARD. SCALE: 1" = 20' N� \\ REMOVED BY PSE. PERMIT NO. 05-103031 -OOEN LIGHT STANDARD AND LUMINAIRE TO BE INSTALLED BY ADJACENT o DEVELOPMENT AT STA 8+21. O RELOCATE EXISTING PREEMPTION DETECTOR TO NEW LIGHT STANDARD TO BE INSTALLED BY ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT AT STA 7+02. °\ APPROVED 10 RELOCATE EXISTING JUNCTION BOX TO BEHIND NEW CURB. ADJUST OR EXTEND EXISTING CONDUIT AND WIRING AS NECESSARY. DATE DESIGN BY: JTH DRWN. BY: JTH BD APP. BY: DHE JOB No. FF086405 SHEET Ts— I OF REVISIONS: CL 0 314" CHAMFER, NO CHAMFER IN PAVED AREAS ANCHOR RODS AND PLATES PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS (4 EA) 2"NOM. GROUT PAD WITH 112" DRAIN HOLE FLUSH IN PAVED AREAS D , %%%%%%% 1 " MIN.-2" MAX. WIDTH OR DIAMETER PER POLE SCHEDULE TABLE DETAIL FOUNDATION NO SCALE GENERAL NOTES CLASS "3000" CONCRETE NO.4 RD OR SQ. HOOPS AS REQ'D AT 1 '- O" CENTERS i 2-112" CLR. 0 8 NO.7 BARS EQUALLY SPACED i soll us TYPE PS TYPE 1 TYPE PPB PED. HEAD VEHICLE HEAD PPB POST STANDARD STANDARD 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS, THESE PLANS, THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (WSDOT) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION AND THE WSDOT STANDARD PLANS. 2. THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE CONTRACTOR AS NECESSARY. FOR UTILITY LOCATION CALL 1-800-424-5555. 3. INSTALL ALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL MATERIALS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, EXCEPT AS NOTED. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE NEW AND OF THE BEST AVAILABLE GRADE OR QUALITY, EXCEPT AS NOTED. 4. ALL WORK SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH AFFECTED UTILITY AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PERTINENT UTILITY AGENCIES 48 HOURS BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND SHALL COORDINATE THE WORK WITH UTILITIES THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY AND THE CITY IMMEDIATELY UPON DAMAGE. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND COORDINATE DATE AND TIME OF WORK FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES 48 HOURS BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. 7. EXISTING EQUIPMENT IS TO REMAIN OPERATIONAL DURING INSTALLATION OF NEW EQUIPMENT. CHANGE OVER TO NEW EQUIPMENT AND FOUNDATIONS SHALL TAKE PLACE BETWEEN 9 AM AND 3 PM MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR. UNIFORMED POLICE OFFICER SHALL DIRECT TRAFFIC DURING THE CHANGE OVER. 8. SALVAGED MATERIALS SHALL REMAIN PROPERTY OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND BE DELIVERED BY CONTRACTOR TO CITY SHOP LOCATED AT _------------------------- ____, FEDERAL WAY, WA. 9. SIGNAL HEAD NUMBERING AND WIRING NUMBERS SHALL BE CHANGED WHERE NECESSARY TO MATCH THESE PLANS. POLE SCHEDULE DEGREES CLOCKWISE TO TYPICAL ATTACHMENT POINT FROM 0° TYPICAL E1 10 SIGNAL ARM ATTACHMENT g r�• POINT POLE ORIENTATION ANGLE (POA) DEGREES CLOCKWISE FROM OFFSET LINE TO 0° POINT DETAIL 180° �I AT 180°NDHOLES N 270° BASE PLATE 0 �? \ � ,- LOCATION STATION _ROgo� �y PLAN VIEW POLE ORIENTATION AND ATTACHMENT POINTS NO SCALE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ALL DIMENSIONS AND ORIENTATIONS SHALL BE FIELD CHECKED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 81 85 82 83 811 a b a B4 c VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM 16'-6" MAXIMUM 19'-0" C li a POLE i+i DI D B6 B7 B9 B10 � a b b b ----------------------- ---- E I or b i I I CON TRA C TOR TO CONFIRM ELEVATIONS I FOLLOWING INSTALLATION, AND GI G j PROVIDE APPROPRIATE MOUNTING I 9 9 (L OR M) AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE CRITERIA. ; H i H a I O I 1 •I o N I LIMITS OF VERTICAL CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS TYPE II MAST ARM SIGNAL STANDARD ROADWAY LEGEND a V HI CLE SIGNAL HEAD b Si GN c STREET NAME SIGN SEE APPENDIX IN SPECIAL PROVISIONS d PRE-EMPT DETECTOR AND LIGHT f LUMINAIRE 9 PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL HEAD h TERMINAL CABINET i PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON ASSEMBLY, AND SIGNS 1 HANDHOLE TYPE III COMBINATION LIGHTING AND MAST ARM SIGN-4L STANDARD 2'- 0 , 00 I MIN�A% CURB OR EDGE TYPE SD OF SHOULDER SPECIAL DESIGN Q NOTES: MOUNTING COUPLINGS INSTALLED BY FABRICATOR AT Fil OFFSET DISTANCE INDICATED IN POLE SCHEDULE TABLE. 11 FIELD INSTALLED. PERMIT NO. 05-103031 -OOEN APPROVED DATE oti t- w M � m Z O O O w m M O to �CO o� W 1- Q 00 00 ¢ L6 L6 0ZZ U N g V� w Q Z Y 0 N z Q 0 Q CO z 0 z Lu a_ - W V) z z z z _ aQ(D z �- a Lu C) 0 Ln 00 Q) o ti W �Q o �o 7dO s oF�' W X w W J W Z U W W Z J 0 � Q _QD U L U 0 Q c �n zZ°0°o � I W � �QN � 0 cl ESUBMITT o cr AUG 2 2 2006 0 �- Q o w 2cvQ •. CITY OF FEDERAL 1 4y � v o = c BUIL STD NO 0 FIELD LOCATION TYPE MOUNTING HEIGHT(FT SIGNAL MAST ARM DATA LUMINAIRE ARM(FT) POLE ATTACHMENT POINT ANGLES (DEG) FOUNDATION DEPTHS(FT) NOTES OFFSET DIST.(FT) (Z) (POLE C TO ATTACHMENT PT.) WINDLOAD AREAS (SQ. FT) (X)(Y) (X)(Y)(Z) STATION OFFSET(FT) LT RT POA Al A2 BI B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10 Bll B1 B2 B3 B4 B6 B7 B9 B10 Bl1 TOTAL(FT) C E> E2 D F G1 G2 H I> 12 3'RD 4'RD 1 * 10+46.5 39.5 X 0 II 35 31 * 26* 19* 12* 9.2 9.2* 9.2* 18 998 0* 7* 2 10+39.5 37.5 X 90 II 35* 26 23* 29* 16* 9.2* 7.5 9.2* 12* 921 0* 45,180 90 180* 135* 0 270* 7* 3* 9+52.5 37.0 X 0 it 36 24* 12 6 9.2 9.2* 9.2 18 770 0* 180* 90* 180 135* 0* 270 7* 4 0 + 37 28.5 X 0 111 18.5 35 17 20** 9 13 4 9.2 7.5** 9.2 12 437 8 0 0 135 7 6 DIN DEPI, o c Z- '�o Of Z �3 0 Q U Z 0 0 DATE: 8/15/06 SCALE: NONE DESIGN BY: NTH DRWN. BY: JTH/BD APP. BY: DHE ,JOB No. F086405 *EXI S TI N G **FUTURE BY OTHERS SHEET TS- 2 OF 2 POLE SCHEDULE A PORTION of the S.W. 1 /4, SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 21 N., RANGE 4 E., W.M. N�W��LNIEW PLANTERV.xo ° INSTALL H ) 10 00 CAMPUS M = POLE POLE CIRCUIT LAMP LAMP DISTRIB. MOUNTING MAST # ID # STREET STATION OFFSET # WATTAGE TYPE TYPE HEIGHT ARM 10 4332-1-1-1 10TH AVE. SW 3+10 33.5' LT 1 250 HPS M-C-III 35 16' O 4332-1-1-2 10TH AVE. SW 4+51 33.5' LT 1 250 HPS M-C-III 35 16' 3� 4332-1-1-3 10TH AVE. SW 5+93 33.5' LT 1 250 HPS M-C-III 35 16' 4� 4332-1-1-4 10TH AVE. SW 7+29 33.5' LT 1 250 HPS M-C-III 35 16' 5O 4332-1-1-5 10TH AVE. SW 8+68 33.5' LT 1 250 HPS M-C-III 35 16' © 4332-1-3-6 12TH AVE. SW 9+70 33.5' RT 3 250 HPS M-C-III 35 16' O 4332-1-2-7 12TH AVE. SW 11+42 33.5' LT 2 250 HPS M-C-III 35 16' ® 4332-1-2-8 12TH PL. SW 22+04 24.5' RT 2 100 HPS M-C-III 30 12' O9 4332-1-2-9 12TH PL. SW 23+08 24.5' RT 2 100 HPS M-C-III 30 12' 10 4332-1-2-10 12TH PL. SW 24+11 24.5' RT 2 100 HPS M-C-III 30 12' 11 4332-1-2-11 12TH PL. SW 24+99 28.0' LT 2 100 HPS M-C-III 30 12' 12 4332-1-2-12 12TH PL. SW 26+07 7.0' RT 2 100 HPS M-C-III 30 12' 13 4332-1-3-13 SW 340TH ST 12+20 28.5' RT 3 150 HPS M-C-III 30 12' 14 4332-1-3-14 SW 340TH ST 13+47 28.5' RT 3 150 HPS M-C-III 30 12' 15 4332-1-3-15 SW 340TH ST 14+97 28.5' LT 3 150 HPS M-C-III 30 12' 16 4332-1-3-16 SW 340TH ST 16+40 28.5' LT 3 150 HPS M-C-III 30 12' 17 4332-1-3-17 SW 340TH ST 17+92 28.5' RT 3 150 HPS M-C-III 30 12' 18 4332-1-3-18 13TH CT. SW 1 +92 24.5' LT 3 100 HPS M-C-111 30 12' 19 4332-1-3-19 13TH CT. SW 3+22 24.5' RT 3 100 HPS M-C-III 30 12' 20 4332-1-3-20 13TH CT. SW 4+30 28.5' RT 3 100 HPS M-C-III 30 12' 21 4332-1-1-21 10TH AVE. SW 1 +65 33.5' RT 1 250 HPS M-C-111 35 16' n 4332-1-1-22 SW CAMPUS DR 9+40 47.5' LT 1 400 HPS M-C-III 35 16' CONSTRUCTION NOTES END SIDEWALK AT Im WIRING SCHEDULE 1+69.sKR 1+0010th AVE. SI 41 N BEGIN 25:1 ASPHALT RUN NO. CONDUIT CONDUCTORS 1 1-2" PVC (SCHEDULE 40) 2 - 8, 1-#8 BARE 2 1-2" PVC (SCHEDULE 80) 2 - 8, 148 BARE 3 2" PVC (SCHEDULE 40) 2 - #8, 148 BARE 4 2" PVC (SCHEDULE 40) 2 - #8, 148 BARE, 3412 PHOTOCELL 5 2" PVC (SCHEDULE 40) 2" PVC (SCHEDULE 40) 6 - #8, 148 BARE, 3412 PHOTOCELL SPARE 6 2" PVC (SCHEDULE 40) 3 - #6 POWER 7 2" PVC (SCHEDULE 80) 4 - #8, 1 - #8 BARE 8 1-2' PVC (SCHEDULE 40) PULLCORD (FUTURE 2 - #8, 1 - #8 BARE BY OTHERS) GENERAL NOTES 1. LIGHT STANDARDS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING NO. 3-39, LUMINAIRE POLE. 2. CONDUIT AND WIRING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING NO. 3-40, UNIFORM LUMINAIRE WIRING DETAIL. 3. LUMINAIRES SHALL BE 240 VAC. U INSTALL 120 / 240 VAC ELECTRICAL SERVICE CABINET NO.4332 AT APPROXIMATELY STA 12TH AVE SW 9+85, 34' RT. FIELD ADJUST _ LOCATION AS NECESSARY. USE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING NOS. 3-41 AND 3-45. / I 2O INSTALL CONDUIT AND WIRING TO PSE POWER SOURCE. COORDINATE It WITH PSE FOR SERVICE HOOK-UP. %\ 3 O INSTALL 18" STOP LINE AT STA 21+38 PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY - - - -NORTH LINE GOVERNMENT LOT 2- •a STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING NO. 3-20. - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - -"` - Nd,5 O4 INSTALL 18" STOP LINE AT STA 11+37 PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING NO. 3-20. I I OINSTALL 18" STOP LINE AT STA 1+36 PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING NO. 3-20. LIGHT J BOK / 9+78 END NEW & SDEWAX ON OF Camwa To �\ \ FASTING SDEW a & 44 REVISIONS: V N N 1 \ \ M 0 o 0 pp S c \ \ v/ (n 00 CD N N 1/ / INSTAL 1 k`� �'- O W co 0o � .g; Fc � � ~ } N N 4 BOLLARD: ' t0 \ Q Q Q 't c REMOVEAB E 3 22 �'OG - o � END WR9, i h SIDEWALK (o ! O N 25:, ASPHALT _ > . `!� \ �1.,,,e.,:. \ I N)l ASPHALT \ \ O- LINE). BEGIN ASPHALT`& SIDEWALK T '//�� N Q TAPER / / `\\ \. ` }'µn•M \ \\\\ \ 9 �9: \ ° � 1+74 T \ J `I:YIA:! PATH o • \ \ \ MMMQQQRRR S�WEWAXTµCYDI � � ' of 7+56 L , END ASPHAL TAPER, E C)/ +!RACE EhSD/ENT , \ .� O r 3 12Al - A6T\ IE: 30 A \ p aoo.o 6' HIGH CHAR IINKPENCE f ,% • _ 0 A- \ (SEE DETAIL) 4+54.5 25:i ASPHALT TAPER \ "b IN 6' HALF NIDTH �14 2 / :per \ e Ik \ \ \ \ STA 4+883 co• ?4.O• d ' LAHo- \ TRA BEDIN 25:1 ASPHALT TAPER END 6' HAP INDTH 45.OD TRACT / 5+59.84 12th PL I WETLAN L cTR-sac 7 zz+6 \ \ \ S,, / 3 ---- WATER LE`M-' o 2 I I \\ 7 13 80T:302 I \ TEa�\\NHNHC LUMINARE rc / 12' WOE SER A \ \ \ \ \ - ------------------------------------- ---- 0\\ \ II Lr) \ \ \` SPHAIT 3 \ � 14 I3 ' o so'- - ( n O j R!Y.=2333A� CID o'- �� + 10 SIGHT DISTANCE s EASEMENT W/- �+ 1 3 RESTRICTIONS ON o - l 9 I t o , OBSTRUCTIONS 3 7 �'Lr \ CIRCUIT # + E 0 251 AS,B'PHALT TAPER �C&1 h1Re, CUTLER & SIDEWALK. INSTALL � aAAw (SEE DETAL� , \ 9.45 1.88 13th CT \ o \ �\ 5 / m c�' 19 oh SAC o0 8 CIRCUIT 2 > 1------- --- 6 x'Oc tix MATCH O INSTALL 3011 X 3011 R1-1 STOP SIGN PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING NOS. 3-51, 3-52 AND 3-53. ` I I 0� 2 3 Y INSTALL 2O CIRB CUT & DRIVEWAY TO ODST. GATE 43 I 1 j - - ... \ •, n / �� i9 \ I 42 I 41 7 INSTALL 30" X 30" R1-1 STOP SIGN WITH STREET NAME SIGNS PER CITY\; ` `' 0 10 O 1a� - t O 9+1 1 A= OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING NOS. 3-49, 3-50, 3-51, � 3-52, AND 3-53. R - ---- OINSTALL RAISED CROSSWALK AND SIGNS AT STA 15+12 PER CITY OF ` \ j I FEDERAL WAY STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING NO. 3-27. S. 9 x 35 �` •Its �\�� `♦ i O INSTALL POURED IN PLACE CEMENT FOUNDATION PER - -: RATBOONDARY I 36 1 37 1 38 I 40 MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION AT 2' FROM EDGE OF TRAIL AT -`�-� srA6+46.a8 39 ,''" s1RErr TINE slaT w/ STOP sTa1 INSIDE OF TRAIL BEND. INSTALL 42" HIGH, VANDAL -RESISTANTS I 1 I I ,AP" 8 LIGHTING BOLLARD WITH 240 VAC, 70 WATT HPS LAMP AND 1400 I "00 I (SEE DEI&) HOUSE -SIDE SHIELD. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S 1 I Abe 2I awomY DATA FOR BOLLARD TO OWNER FOR APPROVAL. ( ( o� - -- _____ 8 c 10 INSTALL 30" X 30" W14-1 DEAD END SIGN PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 34Res°°00 �. d=33.3j,Ss STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING NOS. 3-51, 3-52 AND 3-53. ( 17 \�f+Oo -- a N SW 340th ST 00 6' PVC ROOF DOWWT DRAINSH16+00 54_ 00 LEGEND 1 ; ��� 3 12 -�- - 4+00 ..� -° EXISTING LIGHT STANDARD, ARM AND LUMINAIRE - ,��<` 364SFSUMA ELL _ HCP - TAPERED ROUND ALUMINUM LIGHT STANDARD, ARM AND ��\ D -0 i 32 Too16 LUMINAIRE PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DETAIL 3-39 1 \ C 8 \SROOFDDWNSPg1T 3 3 1 ' 20 °1 9+19.82 12th AVE= Q�XO`O' 1+00.00 SW 340th ST= 1 1+00.00 12th PL i 4 (RAMP - / CIRCUIT #2 z O Q CC5 z O z w CL - w co z z z z - Q Q (7 01- J z 1- o. W Z Q CL ZZzi Z� L �- Zi f1 LV o U w O Q a ° L! `i xp Cl: N 4 p 1 1--. � I-LI Z o : wL s. 7 W Z� N N PERMIT NO. 05-103031 -OOEN iob 13 2 3 CIRCUIT #3 ' 2+54.35 339th 1+00.00 13th CT SIGHT DISTANCETRIANGE LINE APPROVED 1 7 \� 3 DATE O V) C) o W C) co W Z vo= p Z (J-) �CL O Q U 6' PVC ROOF D0I1INSPOUT 4` Z DRAINS o RESUBMITTED U 2 3,ell-re DATE: 8115/06 _\ ` 2 2006 ® TYPE 1 JUNCTION BOX, WSDOT STD. PLAN J-11a (ALT. 2) I 8'IEi \ = 7 \ r a6a.o \ � 30 \ ��. Op � U G 2 SCALE: 1 " = 50' \ = PFBEMMMIN 27IV 0~ $ CITY \ 66' PVDRAINC ROOF DONO WT p TYPE 2 JUNCTION BOX, WSDOT STD. PLAN J-11 a \ _ ® ELECTRICAL SERVICE CABINET PVC CONDUIT 0) CONSTRUCTION NOTE I TA-1 TA-2 TA-3 I caro+Ecr To Ewsnnc ASPHALT PATH. TA-4 MATCH GRADES. -� SIGN - - 7 TA-5 TA-6 POLE NUMBER 1 #1 1 ?' L A TA-7 \ �-10 \ i WIRE NOTE OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. DESIGN BY: JTH 12+74.15 12th AVE 4 BOUNDARY LINE \\ FOUNDATION, LIGHT DRWN. BY: JTH/RS/BD GRAPHIC SCALE 200 STANDARD, LUMINAIRE APP. BY: DHE �� o- --25 50 _ _ -_ goo ____ _ _ '' � _ _ AND WIRING TO BE -- ST. TYPE 2CB INSTALLED BY ADJACENT JOB No. F086405 END EXIsnNG STREET : 371.94 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50ft. I (SOLID LID) DEVELOPMENT �`/ 1EAST SIDEWALK 0 PLAT LINE SHEET `i L - ` EX (TO BE CONn.N1kD BY PLAT OF C9.f1'-. ` CB CREST) I •� 1 ���� � I OF REVISIONS: 20 0 20 40 Emmmi scale feet _ --- — — 10th AVE SW, _ PRINCIPAL COLLECTS _ A PORTION of the S.W. 1 /4, SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 21 N., RANGE 4 E., W.M. NOTE: LIGHTING LEVELS WERE CALCULATED USING AG132 VERSION 1.66 SOFTWARE. VALUES ARE SHOWN IN FOOT-CANDLES. po po pa pa pa pa pa po - pG pa po ,._.a _.-.° t-.° t-.° t-.° —0 a po p p❑ p❑ p❑ p \ - t0 t0 00 J J ( \ i p° po - ❑ pa po p❑ po p❑ po p❑ po pa pa ,._.a ,-.❑ ,-.❑ �.❑ '-.° ❑ ❑ t..a ,-. ❑ po ❑ po po p pa pa po po p J J J 0�� CA CA UI Cn _M � J co CO p `'-' N CA N J "' o o J � GN � (n LA U LA \ O° O° O° O° o_ ° O° O° O O° O° o° pa a pa pa po r.a ra r.o r.a = �a N° N° a ° "I t-o t-o . po po po - a pa po po pa po pa po O i0 �O 07 07 J J 0� CA CA CA U1 J J �0 '--N 0� N W W Cn W '� o i0 J CA CA LA (n � ° t.a t.a a -a -a t.a po po a po pa pa pa pa pa _ p po p❑ a -o -a -a No No po po No _ No -a _a -a -a o a O° O° O° Oa O° O ° O° O p° O° O° o° O° O° \ o (D 0 00 J 0N_. Ul LA Cil J J N W Ul J =p i0 0 o J N oD b" 41 �-' - J CA CA (n CA 0� J J J J__aa' \ o po -o �--° _o �--° ,-.o t-.° t.a t-.° i_.a .-.a o M, p° Oa O P. pa po pa pa p° po o t.v t . Nv W° W❑ Wv Wv Wo No N° ° t-m t.° o- O° O° O O❑ -O° O° p° ° po p ° p❑ a p° po p° po J W �D W Ul � J CA 4, W N 1.10000 J -1 m _ 0, oN J CO t0 W ON - CA o CA W OJ W OJ W Ul N J J m u CA Ul LA J J OJ CO to i0 0 \\ pa a per_ a t . t-o N�o N° Na ❑ t-.° - t.a —a �-. p❑ ❑ p° p❑ ON❑ p° p❑ p❑ p❑ p p° a t-a t.a a W° co. �❑ �❑ pa �❑ p❑ No t-o t . ° p° p❑ p° p° a po p❑ p❑ ❑ p❑ po p❑ p❑ t . —a ,. a —a ,- a —a �.o -a._ \ \ N v OJ o N M z)n �-. W WO O m L. N o �D J J 0� J J OJ N o N W N 1 N LA N 00 OD J m ON CA (n m � J J w k o o w w o \ ° t t-o t-o ,.-.a .tea •-.a/ N° N° pv Co. No N° —a —o ,_..o po p Oa po pa po pc po po po po N° co, �a v •v-�o po N° o -a �.a O° O o° o° O° o°- Oo po po po- t. .-.v -.a --o t-o .-. o t-.a _o a p \ \ W 00o W CA 00 p o fU o J w t0 CO �I J J J J J J J W w J J J N ON -,I J J CDN _i / Cll N W pa a to a }-a N° N° W❑ Wv Wo CO' Wa NO ° •-.a pop ®a o ° po po pO po po po po po pa pa N° t-D ° .t-.o I- wo N° a f+/b "a ° o ° \ p W �il 00 W �D (n J J A o w J J J W CJi W N \ p❑. ❑ �❑ ° No po �o �❑ �a -No Wo N° i-•❑ n ° °. ° -. ° p ❑ po po pa po a �-.° '--D M. N° W° lU° ni° ni �.° �-. �° ° a ❑ po \ .O N CA O �-` \ N N A w °_ p. .° p° °- n ° _° n n p° ° Oi J OJ �0 -P N �� A J o �0 01 W O N J p° ❑ '-iO �--.° o wo po _o �o M. p �--`° t--.❑ N° Wa po W. W. Wv N i �i_'❑ t. "a p pv po 0 W D is 'D � o ° p • ° �o :D C ero o, is J .� ° ° .° p p -p J W CA J CA N O� - G,�\ .. W ° r-o N° n ° C B n ❑ pa -"a �o �a (')oWo N° ❑ a .0 CD N -P �D ° n n. - —� -- ° n OJ W Gl (U i-. v f=. Ul fU 'Q Wo v° -4 CA Ula Ul \ .. -° a n ..LL O° ❑ °. n .. @ . \ �o 41 (Jo N° N t-.❑ t-.a p pa 1OoO::. a - po po p❑ 7O l0 - ' c °4 ..° W Cn J m N Do CA LA LA po Na ° t-o�.° pa O po po po J ° p ° � -.. ° p a b . oo J � '-' t0 J J 0� CA CA CA LA CA ° a ° o° o° o° o oa\o° o° o° o o° ° o° ° °.0 - 4, o �D J �I CA 0... UI Ut Ul 0� 01 _ _O O° O° O° oa ° O° O° po-pa o° o O° O° O �D J J J 0"�0� LA CA UI 0� -4 J m • n' p❑ po pa pa pa pp a a po pa - a pa S ° _4 J J o" ON a,. po ° O° Oa O° po po po po po p° O° p° ° po p V J J J J I'D o0 .. p J J J �.0 - - - o o I p ° _ n \ a o o a pa �.a �.a �.,o -,..,o o t.o �.o o r.❑ i-' � pJ 00 O N ?\� w w 4\\N O w O :A, �__• A W UI UI N co ON w O n �No p❑ po o ° wo -p-o -t'a wo wo N\ (t-a o pa .. N o N A w 0� N o o -P° J-° W° w° No t- "a "-° Oo _ ° o W N W o IU J w J N ° 't,° 4o po N° t\'.❑ —o r..o 0 0 0 i I Ul I p° N W 05 -P N w J p❑ Wa N o i-.a t--.❑ ❑ o O° O o I I N Ul CA N J co cf) D - °° a .-a -o —o o p° O° - o 0 r�r V a p° ° po pa ° P. p❑ po a O t0 co J M CA Ll CA CA po po po o ,po po p❑ pa a J J M &\ 5 CA CA CA r ° po po po a pa po p❑ po pa v ° - _ p _ Ul Cn Ul in \i A m ° po po o po pa pv po pp p tl cDc po pa _ +�., I / / •'/ Yo . pa v po P. pa P. pa •` o% m -A Ili _4 J J O w - - - N N Oa Oo Oo O° - o pa po — 0o p❑ Oa a po po po pe a pa Oi i / ' �, (DoO� J .:'• ° J --A co O N N N N N N , o 0 0 0 0 �--� _ o°Rl° oa ° o° o° o° o° oa on o° • � / o o .o o�� a ° 12th PL SW °. N N N N N N N W W W ° O o —v —° —v ;' J w o - A \Oi I O° o° o° O° oa o° o° o° oa O° o° o° o° /i oY° / N N fU:..: Oa a " c pv pa a �� ° �° tU° N° N 1 i \i ? W W N fU fl) N N N N W W 4J W ----------------------- LOCAL STREET--- I ❑❑❑ I a ❑ o 0 o v v -- ;/ O o v IU GJ V OD -----------_-�----- --- ; - O O O° O O O O C° oaC- o 0 0 0 '" O? O.. - o / \ _ -i- ------------------ - - GJ - ----------------------------- _ -------------- --� - UI -P W W N N N � W W cW �' '•� oa a N° po pa -------- ------- -- `.9' ❑- a ❑ ° ❑ ° o a v po -.Oo pa�. Ov' ° q %D w 010 '�- o o O° o o O O O O° � O ° p _ Oc 4� W w W W W W W ? -P ? -A e C " i+ .. - .. t.,- \ o a Np p❑ P'o �a ° e •. .-�a p pa pv pa o° pa pv pv pa po p❑ pv oa pa o o. o / .-a a � Cn ° ° p. e • ° ° to ? W W CJ .8� CA CA • v ..� ❑ ° o ° a po po pq Oo "o❑- Co ° w J W/ O / ° 'p n ° . .a ..a o� oa oa O 4 pa oa o° o0 oa • O - _ r r _ w - - _ O OF O _/ _ O O O O O O _O O O O O O O O O O _ _ W W N_ W o po pa - pa o v o ❑ pa p po p❑ p❑ po po po po n ° v ° o ° - ° o - - o o ° ° o ❑ o v-- c>- -po o - ° v N° --to Ov pa ov o 6� pa pa Ov pa a o° o Op' �5� Oa pd ° po (n -�-� . / Cn o . "n -A � Ui J O0 A 41 w w w W W CJ L 9 w w GJ - ? o� 0� 41 W w w W W (J CJ GJ �0 p V V N (q W P ` o / WO° O° 00 ❑ ° ❑ p po po po p❑ v �° po po ❑ po po pa po pa po po po v v �-.a r f.a - oa °, Ov r° .ra W W W W W W W W - v ° / S _ / 2 o N❑ ❑ o °3 a pa P. po (Do -- 0° ° p r+oS4P° I JY� O° O° �O° O° O° O O° O° O o —o �o tr v v Oa Oa O° O Oa .+a ro .w .+a •:. - :_n Oa " Ov a 0� / \/ J N ? N �O O� CA W W W W W W W W CA - _� '% Q„jn� �(� ? W W J- --_w W W w � LA w W N J Ul A W w W O� �O N Ul V po po po ti.v ro ,-.o a ti..❑--?a--. o pv pa o pa po pa pa pa po pa P. o p p i-.° ►+a �°' 4+-.�9 �.° O O O° ° O° O° _(Do O° Oo O° o° - ° P. O Oa - p0 �_-. po - pa p° - oa - - - - - ,-.a - W N CA J CA N J CA� W W W N W w W A CO W (n A (n W w N lU W W OJ w W W W W W O� On '+. - / // ❑ �� ❑ LLI po ❑ �-.❑ `.-.° '�'y/^tb r-.o t-.a ❑ p po p❑ po po po pa po pv p° p° ° p v�t�L;- I t.0 Iv t.. v p° ° p° 0° p° o° 0° p° p° p❑ p po p ° o O° O° pa paJ��Y•'a O Oa .-.o �-.o ..,,a ° o a:.4.:. i • ° / / / / / a ° / (� o CA �0 00 i0 W tD 0� -P W W W N W W W 0� �0 �' J '.' Ui W W W N W W W W 4 CA 0� 0� o� o� _ CA ? W W W W W -P (JI A J V J o ° ° p° pa po po po po p❑ pa po po po ° po po po p° po pa a pa pa p° p° p° p° eo po t-o -a #7�� 41 J 00 o �D 4p w w w m w w o+ ao �o / / / / ° I . ❑ ❑ ❑ I-� ❑ h ❑ C p . N co W W (A/ o° oa ° - oa o oa ', : / � �I V I W I ) El El E 010 • 1`'.- i ,\ ° - . //� / \\/ // ,/',/' // �� °°%° ❑ Fes° 00 El ElF�E I 004 CD rn El co u K El El El E 45' � / ° ck) ° 0 0) w m -� i I I / ��� \ / / �. // ,d/ - - - - ! . m / I I I I �° / /, // / / / vx, f U C�J (�J f U U f L �I C J o 0 r� I I / w I-� O ❑ ❑ CD ❑ CD ❑ CD E 0 CD m' - - - - - �I � w P 0� �I o � � F o❑ O❑ O❑ OE El El El E El 1:1 El I rn /' /'' /' F)J w U1 �0 - - 0� '—' an I� W O V m Q1 — - — — —/ -- - - ---- - ------ - -__- - I — — — — — ----- ---------------------------- ---------------- - / / _/ / + MEh° ❑ o I ❑ o -°o ° w° ° 0o( - - - - - (D O / - - -\0 - - o U-1 m `p gESUBMITTED 1-U° i-U° C.J° (U° t° AUG 2 2 2006 � w 00 CITY CITY OF FEDERAL, WRol BUILDING ;DEFT, U Z W o — M 1N Q W U� cl) N O O4 Q CO (n V / O NO Q r N 00 co Q W Z Z g N N _ o Y � J rl bb co--d y_I F� OG� cd 01 d w v J L0 zzCQ EliZW�N CN �om� W n. o(Z:) = q) o Q 06 o: W Q O F_ a of z O U DATE: 8/16/06 SCALE: 1 ° = 20' DESIGN BY: JTH DRWN. BY: JTH APP. BY: DHE JOB No. F086405 SHEET 1 OF 3 REVISIONS: . / v°j J p po po po p 0, 0 pa o go _ `b pa o o p o a o O_ o`er O % s `\\ 0, O" w to D ON po po o a' go go go p \ ° o° PEP o°io o° o° o° o° ` a CJl - 1, 1t'� P 1> w w W W Z4& 01 01 J A PORTION o f h e S. W. 1 4, S E T I 0 N 19 , ° p° p° p p° p° p° p° ° p p° ° p° / / X A A W p .� 11 / �` ° o° O° O° O`i O° O° O° O° O° O° O° O° ° O% ° O° O° o° TOWNSHIP 21 N RANGE 4/ E. W.M. `:'` Wa Wo Wa wa Wa -o �a- a o W W C>ON w w X GJ Q p pa a po po a p po p0 po O pa p0 po po po ° ° W W W Cn -? W W N °. ° Oo O° O° O° O° O°- o C>o o° o° O° O°V / AA w is is in cn cn is W W W pa pa po po o a p0 pa pa po a p---- -N A w W W w ° -- \� po po go po 0 0 0° o° o° o o° o° o° 4 CA _ 01 Cn U1 � � I scale sNN feet Oa a p a p° p A �O �? 0� /�� -vOg po po po p° p ° ° CDC p° _ CO�E� in RAN NILPCp0 o po p C:) ut v p0 po / I o o ro ro �v ro r po �t f b p P v o.0� in in W ° 0 ro r° r° a r0 �.-. p O° O° O° o O° O° O° O° \ / r O l0 l0 w ao J v ON a cn —u Cn '„�„) - Na Na Na F)Tro ra - o O / p ° N '-'13 ° w W ra ra pv go a pa p0 pv po p0 0 T /-� .p � W o N 0, °.. ° - - O O O OD _ �I O� (.71 UI / wo N° N° _ a r-o 0 0 o O° ro r0 -0 r0 ,..av r0 r0 r0 ro r0 a po (Do p o pa po pa `r i \�) / / ° W � W m Cn p ° ! / e : �I w W (Jl 0� �l Cn A W N w V V 0% 0� 0� W e pa pa 0 p o �--.o ra Na Na Na o —0 ro q CO 0 po po po po Rol / o �0 No _ o W o �° Ln ;� , " / ° ° V V 00 p N O% i-� 0 0� '1,UL o i" " W �Q 1D V -! � 0� 0� v 4 / \ ° ui o a a r0 o a o o ° \ / ° p o 0 go pE o r° ro ro ra r o o U) N p ' M - N N� W W N N � �`° �`° �`° O° o o° O° O go po go _ Cn N Cn .p O� V �IW o '__` W Cn pD O O ON w O �I W / / N N0 r0 ro O° O° O° O° " d e 0o po r�o o po po go o �.o _c 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a ° o ro �_-.0 0 o a 7W'1\� N N W W W W W N p o _O 'I'- 'F N " to J UI A ? ' !�; ; /° - Cn Cn V OD ID - J�i 00 W t0 Ln J �l � o _P w r t0 / O o 0 0° o° o° o° o° oa 0 po po pa a ra o N0 Wa �a �0 �a �o Wo N° a O ° ° fU o - P P ? ° ''� .� " '/ ° '. ° p ° UI UI UI UI Ul UI V j �O -P V 00 Ln O r \ N N -P O W ' ' i - / _ , po p0 p0 po C3 p0 0 o po po o ro r° a wo O CJ1 ° p0 ° pa p0 CT�oo° cB _ ° i ' O� 0� Cn Cn Cn Cn 0% V OD w W �I UI ? w e ' i a ° / / V /%i i O° O° O° o° o° o°\ ^O_ O_ O° O° ° O° r ro ro ro No \ o o° o° o° o° o° Y' ° -I -4 V �i 0� Ul UI Sul -I �I t0 p N -N �O PC PC go_ — / �- O 57� _4 a- ° o° o° o° _p _p° p° p° o° o° o° ° a. \ / / ° cn PC ° .p W o° w W W i p e p OD OD V V �I O� 0� V V W CO �o ° ' c ° a a o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O -{ o a pa pa - - - po pa ® % I. /- e- /W W W W W W � - a _ � ° a � 00 �I �I �I O� 0� �I �I V V ' . .- °- p - i a ra ro �o ra _o �o p po po po po po po po p a ? W W W W w W W - - - • I1.0 r0 ro ro ro ro ra r \ O°(� O° O° O° \. 9 0° o° o° o° o° o° o° o° ° ' ' W ON Cn � 1, 1, /4 > N o W ib V -4 ° ° a O O° O r0 ra h+o F-a r ro f-o r° o p �o e I a pa oa pa - \ oa oa in (51 o p r�ygo po o ro r-o ro ro r° o No No a Na No No r ro o . p , / / o °'0� 01- V OD O O " Ul ntQ �' /mil O� UI ? r N N o 'v pv po po pa 0 r0 ro r o o No o W0 W0 W0 Wo N° ro .° \\\ e VPC go v �a V V V OD �o - no Do ra ra .-o ro ro - "W° w° 40_° 00 io Co S� fU W O� 6 0� o N W 0� p ° . p O° O° O° o° \O° r0 r �--o r° ro o --e- t0 �O w "o o O `- fU A �1 " N o w ° / -4-*--- - I -T--- ..p .-.o ra ro '..>0 �.o r �� o r- o ro N° o O o n o W 0� �w ? P ' / ro ra 0 ra r- a •-a r _ a � ro 4,o W N o 0 0 0 o G.) Q Cn z / e ro a ry r0 t-0 r0 ra 0 - i_-o �--�I r0 r0 ® fUa a ° - ON 0 W N o o (U Sat � ON Oo - ON D ro r0 r0 0 ° ro r ra .WO��.o ro p® ° e . W N b O O � 4 Cn y � p° I NO N° _ r-o r° ra r0 ro r -0 r _�- ra r0 �O . W j o 0 0 * N W � / 1'I I I ° N° ra ra ra ro ra ro r0 ra ra ra �® / a i-- 4 I / cn ° r° ra ra �. a po a pa pa ra ° 3 -P A° W° W_ ° t0 O� W N `__� �D t0 to p O W W �o ra ra .-o ro ro po o po pa p - ° ° A° -0 A° i,r N° FL) cn '' O t0 ID N W M ,/ OD OD ° a A N o UI (ll \-!� ° / a N° wo W° w° W° W R)° - - - - CO O° o° o° o V V w V 0 a �0 p Cn � V M A 0� �. r . o ❑ P. ❑ pa ❑ o° 0 0� d• a No No N° No Na �--° ro ro.. r o - �I 1 0� Ul a to fU 0� V m V 1a �o Ln N O�`_ ��pa 6° O° o a ro ro ro N / o _ ra �-,o .-o o - _ o_ o Cn Cn Cn i, . a Ln Ln to � OD � O "o ON 4 W Ln p0 �.pa a On pa ° / ® e p❑ p ro ro r° �❑ �❑ r❑ t-0 r0 ro ro -. V 07 0 1> Ln Cn Cn Cn 01 w • O° O° 0° pa pa ov �-+q ro ra ra ra _ C-:` I .4 01 Zr, �! CO O \ \ii-. r i--. IN : � > p O° Oa v� O° O° O° .4 o po O° pa a p{tOp0 po po po - W W -P W oo po o° O° o° O° po po po ° ' ap -.. a (A X Un Cn UI (n (n 0 V w w m n p pa 6° p° O ° 0° po po go o° 9a `P o° O° o° _ _ .a • 1> ,,.. Cn •? -P Cn Fri° o° o° o° o° o° a - � O° O° go ° p.' ° 12th PL SW � �,� . � a 1, � � 1, cn (n cn m ° p � , o o° o° o° o ` / po po oa` po go pa pv Da o° o° o° o° e° - N _ cfl �' L------------------------------------- ----- -\ � o 0 0 G Cn cn ? � ? A A Cll c ° ' _p. ° o° ° o- OC L STREET O° O°, O° O° I O� O° O° O° O° O° .a...p O �O , O OJ 01 °.. --_---_--__--------------__------- _-�---_- - .. ` o ET `/ a -P � � .p. � � �. i► � ? ? .:p ° / O O ra ro ro r0 r 0 0 p .a. I 7ri ° o 00 r -P W a o po go po \ po o0fya pa pa po ° �a / O O N - - ro a a o 0 0 0 0 0 e (� ZI CD % ° ° \ po pa pa po po po , pa pa po a Crl N °a w �' I- \ W - / O N I ,/ Cn Cn 1, A P A ? ° N -? ° ° r - ° O p° O° O ° O° C + /'�' ° \ O° O° O° O° p° O° o O° O° ° ° ° ° rr O 3 ° UI O A ? 1a ? W W _ W Z J S `� `< - o o O° p° CD N �CDO p°o ® 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Q-�•/a Cn (11 UI Cn A• -p p . / - D ra ,moo- o n o 0 0- o o a ° ° o0 0 ° o ° 0 ° a o p po po a -.°:./< a A _P ? ? ? � ? ? V .{a W W W W W W W W W w - , ? �J U� / % 01 01 Cn P 1, P 1, A i- m ° o° ° o° o° o° ° o° O° O ° ° ° @ o° o o° o° o° o° O° o° o° O° o° o° O° p° W o° o° o° o° O° O° O° O° ° o °' II II N 00 A ' 49 ? 1, �� UI Cn p 0\ Ul -A W W w w w w W W W .A 4. UI V Cn Cn / - - po ° po pa pa po po o po po _ rn ra r° ® -- a-po .-,° p0 r-�° 0 po _ p 0� ? W W W W W Ln ro l° ? R) Z 3 •'' / p °' o° o° O�% ° o° o° o° o° p ° " tD 0� Cn W W W W W W W UI Co CO w to OD Cn Cn Cn ° po po po po p0 pe ° po po po r0 r0 ro o ry a O° O° ° O° O° O° O° O° O° po go o p p D / ° r0 ro ro ro ro .- - o o pa p °' .° / c W W W -P� (n �I �D N Cn V Cn to O O� o O O O O o O O O < I i ° . ° N " " O " O O OJ 01 Cn 4° ° O° O° o° o O° ° r ry ra _ .-a ra ° ° o a o a o o ° 0 ° o W IT! %' °' a / W o (A ID OD to (,) .D 0� ++ W W W N W (,) (,) 4 41 ON io W ra ra rn rn ra r ra rn n o o e ' o il p - N - ro ra O po \ _ .. ° c ° a go e OD 00 F� W J W V- / C° p0 o ro r Na W WO Wa wo Wo N° r .4p / — / ° 0\ LD to 1a �0 �/p ? 0 Cn W .p p pa -.° ° a po a- t--° t-o N Wo W0 �a �a Wo r co in .o / c' go p o o a a ro o No Wa �a �a o �o a °. ° p° (�,o/��•,a p° ° po a ° ro No Wo gp ° p (11 f Il \ Y ft m o1 v o Om po o �0 po po po p �-. ro ro Na ° / ? � ? Cn Cn Cn aD O W :I V a I _ a I : pa o pa ° pp pa p_ a o po po ° a ro ro Cn Cn � ° 0l,\ c p0 po p0- a pa go pa po l,O° o° O° O° \ pv po a po O° O O° O° co CD v_ j�0 O OVO pn pa pa pa � p _ e p / \ I o° O O° o° o° ° �6 0 - o o° o° o° o° / 4A 1, � u _"GC �1Q ❑ f-�❑ ( O� _ 0 O° go O°. ` pal 90 go p0 pa Pa 1 D j V O a a � oo oa Oa O° 0° C° O° pa UI tJl Cn 4El PC p PC PC PC go PC PC PC 0 p ° i i I I O o0 o pa pa CA go . a / lJl i aD v cn in in FO OD v o+ cn p • • / 1 ° e — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —\ — — — — — — — — — — — — ------------- EXIST. 15" HDPE STORM DRAIN — — — — �- — _ _ sB------------------------�--� I — — — — — — — i-} ---------------- ------------ - -- --- S01°13'36"W --tea - -1 -- - -- ------ --- -- -- -- __ 412.00' c7iRESUBMITTED AUG 2 2 2006 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. U Z v W N M Qw _ F- C) O}M �^ V) ro o 0 o If- Z Q 0 N 0 N 00 Z Q N CV X J Q 0 t r_1 4-? �n �[ L 0 moo 0 =4•r_1Co Co Naw ll � GV) o d)w r J r rn N Ld O Q� a x w H U W 0 0_ 0- LLJ � In _ f� o ZZ� W a, can QE (N O^' W '�^� v J (L'` o Z =NQ . > U_Or=^ w Q) V VJ Ca ! ^ Cl W 0 F Z 0 CU DATE: 8/16/06 SCALE: ill = 20' DESIGN BY: JTH DRWN. BY: JTH APP. BY: DHE JOB No. F086405 SHEET 2 OF 3 REVISIONS: A PORTION of the S.W. 1 /4, SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 21 N., RANGE 4 E., W.M. i 20 0 20 40 scale feet � -NORTH-LINE GOVERNMENT LOT 2 d \ ,<<, / - - S88°58'44"E 298.22' / I N I = I / I I / I i i I I I a 0,3 0.3 0,3 0,❑ ❑ p p2 2 0.2 0.2 0, p v v v p _ 0.4 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,2 2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 d p p p p p a ❑ ❑ p p ❑ 0.5 0,5 0. 0, 0,4 0.3 0.3 0.2 ,2 02 02 0,2 0.2 ° a ° a a v p v ❑ v ❑ ❑ v v a p .7 0, 0,5 0.5 0.3 0,3 0.2 0.2 0,2 0,2 ,2 ° ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a p ❑ m o- a p p p 0• 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0, [�a a a a ❑ O O O O a a ° ° 1.'3 1.3 8 0. 0,5 0. 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 a 0,3 d 1.7 1.0 1.6 1.2 ,0 0.7 •6 0.5 .4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 .3 0.3 •4 0 d 1 v v v v v v v °. v ❑ ❑ ❑ v - - - 1, _j,,7 1.4 1. .8 ,6 0.5 0 4 0,4 0,3 0.3 0.3 040.5 e15--o, a .. 'A am0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0, p a a a ❑ a 0.2 0.3 0.3 0• 4.4 .4 0.3 4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0• 0.4 0.4 0.4 0. d dQ ❑ v ❑ v ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ v 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 o a .2 0.3 0,3 0. 0.4 0 Qf6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0,6 ° \ 0.3 Qk4 0• 0,6 0.8 0,8 a ❑ . a 9 ❑ 7 6 c a •5 •6 •8 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1,4 1.2 ,8 0.5 0. a \ ° p ❑ p p ..a a 0.9 1.3 1. rs Ly .9 1.6 1.3 0• 6 0.5 0.4 p v v p ❑ ❑ ❑ p p p ❑ 1.5 22,3 2.6 297 2.3 0 L4 0 0 0.6 0.5 ,4 0.3 4 ---- - ---� -` SW 340th ST p v ❑ a •,. ❑ a a a v ❑ ❑ 6 •9 E. 2. , 1.6 1. •8 6 0.5 0.4 0.4 4 0.4 0`'--- I ' -_------ e� a a a a a a a a a ❑ p -- _--- _------------------------------J-----------U NOR COLLECTO 5, 31 1.7 1.1 0 8 0. 0.5 0.4 0.5 0. 0,4 0.3 0.3 -------- ---- ---- - ----- ------------- p ❑ O p ❑ ❑ a p a ❑ O O a a 0 2.3 17 1 9 ,� 0.5 04> 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 - - - - - a v ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ p ❑ a v ❑ ❑ ❑ v p a- a a d _ d 1.2 0 16 0• 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 /3 0.3 ° Qa ° . 4 a. d. d 'a d . - a It a 4 ° ❑ ❑ p a \❑ ❑ ❑ v ❑ ❑ p a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 'd 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 ❑ v v p ❑ v ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ p ❑ ❑ ❑ v ❑ v p p v ❑ ❑ ° v ❑ a o a ❑ ❑ a ❑ p p a p o 4 0.4 0,3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 /p0.3 0• -Q.4 0 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 n 0.4 0.4 4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0. 0, d a v p v p p p a ❑ d� m 7� p v v ❑ p p p a v a a o a ❑ ❑ p ❑ 70. 70. 70. ❑ o p v 3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0,2/0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0,3 0.3 @ 0. _ 4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0 0.4 0.4 .4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 .4 0. 0, \ d p ❑ p v p p v❑ 70. p p3� ' a p p ❑ a a ❑ o o a p p p p p a v a ❑ ❑ p 0.2 .2 0.2 0.2 0• 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 .OS 8 0 1.3 1.2 1. 0.6 6 0.5 0.4 0.4 40.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 .4 0.4 0.4 0. 0• � ❑ ❑ v ❑ v TO. 70. 70. p v v a � ❑ v ❑ ❑'-v a a o a v ❑❑ ❑ v a v. ❑j•'�eK -.�_v❑ p 0.2 0.2 0• 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0, 40.4 6 0. 0. 1,0 1!3 1.7 0. 0.7 .6 0.5 0 1-3 ' 7 .3 0.2 .2 -0.2 0 2 D a �,3 0. -0.4 0,4 0• a _ (�� o a p a v p a a ❑ a r� ❑ a a.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0• 0,4 6 0.8 1.0 1.3 a 2.2 2.3 2.3 a.8 1.3 i. 0 8 0 � 0.5 4 `'P3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 4 0.5 0• p ❑ ❑ ❑ p ❑ p p a p p ❑ p a p p p o a p ❑ ❑ ❑ o o p ❑ to p p 0.3 0.4 0.5 .6 0. 1.3 1. 2.3 2.8 .7 2.8 2. 1.7 1.3 0 0 6 0.5 •4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0,2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 5 12 CIE: 361.9 \ WE MH Op VVV/ ___7R-.CT E3 _ 2" IE: 362-0, 3 p p ff� a p a p p p ❑ p a a a ❑ ❑ a a a a a O a p p p d a Q 8 2.7 3. 3.3 2.8 1.9 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 U. 0 d p p a CELL 4' LANDSCAPE - - - - - - - - - - p p p p v p a a v v ❑ 0❑ .° - � 19 7.9 17 1.4 ,1 0.8 ,6 0, 0.4 0.3 0.3 03 0.3 4 0.5 .6 ,8 °: p p p p70, p p ❑❑ � 1.6 19 1S 1 i, 0, 0.6 .440.3 0.3 p a O 0,3 0,3 0,4 0 4 0 7 1.0 13 a p a a a p a p a a p a a a ❑ ❑ ❑ 1.3 0 0.6 4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 04 .6 11.2 1.7 \2.0 ° 7 •8 0.6 4 0.4 0, ,9 1.3 1.7 1.8 a 0.6 ,6 0.5 0 0,4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0,3 0. 0.5 0. 1• 1.3 15 1 7 2.0 \ ``\•` v v v TO, 70. v v v p a v ❑ ❑ a p v ❑ _________________ - C 4 4 0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0. 0.5 •6 •1 1.4 1.5 1.7 1• 3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0, 0.2 0.2 0, 0.2 0.3 4 0. 0.7 1.0 to v a p p p p p p' v a p a ❑ v p p p - 0.3 0.3 0.3 0,2 0.2 0.2 0, 0.2 0.3 4 0.6 0. 7 0.7 0.8 0 0, ` O J p p p v v a a v v ❑ v a v v p \ (4. 3 0.2 0.2 0,2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0• 0.3 0.3 0.4 4 0.5 0.6 0.5 ,4 . I 6" PVC ROOF DOWNSPOUT \�' 0, `° o, ° 0.3 0,3 0. 0 0. 0.4 0• �< C) DRAINS a.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 o e 'n - __-------- d a .3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0, ° 0.3 0.3 0.3 0,2 ° .2 0� 5' PRIVATE DRAINAGE \'. 0.3 0.2 p,2 0.2 0,2 0, C EASEMENT 0.2 ❑ 0.2 0,2 0.2 0.2 \ CLEAN OUT (TYP) y 0.2 01212\ 2 0.2 0• a p v a a / \ d 0.2 0.2 0,.?' 0.2 0.2 02 \ 0,2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0 0, a .2 0.2 0.2 0• �.2 0.2 . I 0.2 0, a.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 I a .2 0.2 0.2 \\2o.30,2 0.2 .3 0.3 0,3 n ,3 0.3 0,3 0,4 ° 0.4 A 0..5 .5 0,4 4 1.3 1.3 .1 Y 0. \. L7 1.5 ).2 a 0.7 % _ 1•6 1.4 a1 0, 60• \ C�1.8 1.4 1. 0 0.5 I ° ❑ p ❑ Q _ 1.7 1• 9 •6 ❑ p 0, 0• II d. ❑ p ❑ ❑ . i 0.8 0.6 0. 0.4 a v p p p p a •6 0. :4 0.3 0. 5 ❑ 0.4 3 �(al0. \ a AAON p d 0. 0.3 0.3 0. 0.3 0; 0.3 0.3 a a a 4 Q 0.3 0.3 0,3.7101.3 I a 0.2 0,2 ° 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0,3 0• ; 2 0 • 0.3 0.3 0.3 00, 444 (-4 0 •2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 =X W t. ❑ p a ❑ ❑ a p 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 ,4 0.4 0.5 .4 ❑ ❑ ❑ p a ° a 1 0.3 0.3 0.3 O4 0A 0.5 0 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 ,6 I a v ❑ v p v p. v WW � 0,3 0• 0.4 0.5 0.5 0,5 0;5 0• 12 1.51 ---------- ------------- : d 0.3 0,4 0• 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 j0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0. ❑ 4 0.4 0.4 0.5 A. 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0,4 0. 0.4 0 ❑ 4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0,3 0.3 0,3 •3 0.4 ,4 3 0 0.4 0.4 4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 •3 0. ,4 .440.4 0.5 0.5 •4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 b,5 0.5 0.5 0.5 .4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0,3 3 ❑ 6 0.5 0.4 •4 0.3 0.3 0• d 0.5 0.6 0.7 6 0.5 0• 0.4 ❑ p ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a O ❑ ❑ ❑ O p ❑ a p ❑ ❑ p ❑ 0.5 0A 0. 0• 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 022 0.2 • 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 .4 0.4 .6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.3 1. /�1,0 0• 0.7 0.6 M .4 ° p ❑ ❑ ❑ a, ❑ ❑ a ❑ ❑ ❑ ,❑ ❑ ❑ a ❑ a a a a a ❑ ❑ tk a ❑ ❑ 0 6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0;2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0 4 0.4 0• .0 L4,, a.5 a 4.7' 1.4 1,2 1. 0.8 0• v ❑ v p K, p ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ v v 115 1.4 1.4 1. 0• 0.7 0.5 0.4 0. 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 -❑ 0.3 0 ❑ ❑ p 4 /P•4 0.5 0.6 p p v a ❑ p 1.6 .0 2.3 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.2 ° o a n 1.6 G a 8 p ❑ p 1.4 1, ❑ ❑ ❑ 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.4 ❑ 0.4 ❑ 0.3 ❑ 0.3 ❑ 0.3 v 0.3 ❑ 0.2 p 0.2 p 0.3 p 0.3 v 0.3 ❑ 0.3 a p 0. 0:4 a p - m 0.4 0.5 6 1 t p p ° a ❑ p •9 1.2 8 2.5 2\6 2.9 2.9 3 2.0 2.5 2 4 2 3 .8 1.3 1. 8 6 0.5 4.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 •6 •8 d .0 1.4 1 2.8 • a a 2.7 2• 8 2.9 0 p a 2. 1.8 1._ a p .8 .6 0.5 0.4 p 0.3 p 0.3 a 0.3 a 0.3 p 0.2 ❑ 0.2 p 0.2 p 0.2 p 0.3 v 0.3 m 0.3 a v 0.3 0.4 O p v 0 0.4 0. 0. a p v 0 1.5 2.1 3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 , o ' - d d T ------- ---------- ------- - - 4' LANDSCAPE I I I I SESUBmITTED AUG 2 2006 CITY � F FEDERALLDEPT. AY D �� DEP W U Z V J WO N M Q L1u � N 0) O Q 4 M U O N > c r O T.- QW a N ONO Z 00 Lo Z Q N N J Y H � 4-) Haw n,., o��0, �yls oF� V) uj a w U w O IL v J V) _ z�°0o =WAN U)oQN ce CL w w � C� O = N o ��QD O 06 VVV JJJ n� �l �' w Z 0 H o z O U DATE: 8/16/06 SCALE: ill = 20' DESIGN BY: JTH DRWN. BY: JTH APP. BY: DHE JOB No. F086405 SHEET 3 OF 3 r r A PORTION of the .� /4, SECTION 19 TOWNSHIP 21 _ N., RANGE 4 E., W.M. LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH BEGINNING OF A 340.00"IFOOT RADIUS CURVE THE CENTER OF' WHICH RANGE 4 CAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, BEARS SOUTH 53'44'33" WEST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE SW 330 ST SAID PORTION BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ---THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05'00'38", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 29.73 �' ` D / ``� FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'06'36" EAST PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER A j ��. � OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF / COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE 39 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; �p ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF SOUTH 89'00'18" EAST 335.78 FEET; 183. / / 9 THENCE SOUTH 01'35'16" WEST 42,00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH / I , V, `( RECONFIGURE INTERSECTION FOR .� OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER LEFT TURN LANE ONTO 10tn AVE SW. s� 30 FEET OF THE WEST 264 FEET OF THE NORTH 412 FEET OF GOVERNMENT ~ / \� 8501170665, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH. MARGIN SOUTH 89'00'18" EAST 18.07 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A LOT 2 IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE `� t, - n\ WASHINGTON IN KING COUNTY, . CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 658.00 FEET; MERIDIAN, - THENCE EASTERLY 700.54 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL El`y ANGLE OF 60'59'59"; THENCE SOUTH 28'00'19" EAST 422.43 FEET TO\� THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING AND THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 842.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH- T / T ADDITIONAL R.O.W. Gs EASTERLY 217.49 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF��,, � 0 -TO S / BE DEDICATED TO O� 14'47'59" TO A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 47'11'42" �{ r �'\\ '� D o:� \ THE CITY WEST; THENCE LEAVING SAID MARGIN ALONG THE NON -TANGENT EAST LINE .000, OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT SOUTH 01'1312' WEST 390.17 FEET TO THE\ _ SITE r l SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID �i � \ i U '� t, � �"� o � �'\ \ ��'�, �� •� � \ \ \ •9 GOVERNMENT LOT NORTH 88'59'20" WEST 561.92 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF ANON -TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUSEl k SAGHALIE \.�.. , „; OF 897.03 FEET (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 3e� % \ ' �� 'Z, �`�� SW 348 ST _ PARK;\\, �`,� QP \ `\ �s� 74'48'34" WEST); THENCE NORTHERLY 732.77 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 46'48'15" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 1 ( •y , S VICINITY MAP \ \ 9 THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, -k. � \ � � ,`\ 10 � � �� �'.q � ' • � \ '., � � �, ���'� N.T.S. ; RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, Q LYING NORTHERLY OF A LINE BEGINNING ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID• 5170 F� GOVERNMENT LOT AT A POINT 412.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHWEST ` 1 \�� �\ .\•\ '� ��\�, \ i CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EAST TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT 5?t25 SF 0h I WETLAND \, \ LOT; EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 264.00 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ! k p`O �2' o`� �' \ z � ' '1 \� �`�' �\�\`� WETLANDS DELINEATED BY HABITAT G" :-� �,•� TECHNOLOGIES IN REPORT DATED COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF i o � Q/ .'- - � �; I � .�,\ � � � �, 5.e i �\� \, \ 4/8/03. THE WETLAND BOUNDARIES THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE SOUTH 89'27'31" `�� 0. I ( Y REFLECT EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 264.01 FEET TO / 2 i �`\rC 2C AFIELD SURVEY BY DRYCO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89'27'31" EAST, y' 5005 SF SURVEYING. A DISTANCE OF 298.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21'47'27" WEST A DISTANCEI ` it v� I Mi 16.0' �� \ CI TY OF TRACT A. . \�� �_, OF 122.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70'08'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 83.38 I / 4 I \ �� FEET THENCE SOUTH 53'44'33"FEET;? / - - -,�i - TRACT D - DRAINAGE I \ ��\'S'�; WETLAND A: 1029 SF (TO BE FILLED WEST, A DISTANCE OF 164.46 'FEDERAL WAY j I \ \,. ,` . 1` i THENCE NORTH 36'15'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 44.74 FEET TO THE i � - LANDSC PE `14465 SF WATER b R SEPARATE, PRIVATE\ 1 610 SF \ Z`��gg DRAINAGE FACILITIES` 1 3 { \ 1 I �� ,,TEL.\ LUMINAIR?-", SHALL .BE PROVIDED FOR 6246 SF 1 I ��� \`: SETBA CK SOT 45\ 25'R \ -- - - - ( \� lop � 144' , � , o �FRONT: ------ ' �� I` \ I 5 sF \ I \ r SIDE: 5 I , \_ . 7267 SF o - j \ "„ R EA R: 5 RM2400 (,M 4 _ i 0 I- -- I �., - \ 35 5, 14{;' tl Fi4 SSMH, RIM=288:34; o� \ \ �0 v \ 'NO MQASUREMENT--, �AGHALIE e. ' 10 G ( i �� 5� 5300 Sf i �RP 7237 SF �� s I , SITE DA TA ------- 7 I I AREA: TOTAL:% r- I L. 13.49 ACRES __ ---- ------------� r I \ ;i`. 3348 SF :�`--�` ,` , o �\ 5300 SF E TAX LOT t 1 `� �+ I ,,� AR , #30: 8.48 ACRES ---------a I , `', � '� 6� ' ' ' � ' �,� I \ AR EA- TAX LOT # 44: 0 FEDERAL WAY i - < < 6915 F\ r _ 103' i 5 1 ACRES �F FUTURE MULTI-F MILY r _ -- __-- .. _ PR PO'S)ED NO. LOTS: 45 SCHOOL DISTRICT ; ;y I I \ �wt LOT DEV£LOPMEN 134 n '. f o. 26 2 5 00 SF I R S 2 _ RM2400 (TAX LOT #44) \ 7 ! + KL AK GOLF ZONI''�;: RS 7.2 (TAX #30} `t 62 10�' PRE'OSED DENSITY: 3.34 UNITS�ACRE 90 F LLC PR . NORTH �I GOVERNMENT LOT 2 ,: \ JSED USE: SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ES D - _ - - _ -w Lr 'E �96 22' LANDSCAPE _. - �_ �� 3oo.sF I �u OF?' N E FAM R FEDERAL WAY FEDERAL WAY - - _ i ` �'� i a 260. B FFER \� `n SCHOOL OISTRI T SCHOOL DISTRICT I -109 _, - - _ c` PA = L NOS.: 19 21-0 4 9044 T.L. 52 I T.L. 53 RS 7.2Ln \\ �, 18 �� __ -\- - - ----------- I i 4 1' ,� V. \ 7350SF -1------- 192104 9030 19 r_-- �-- �' �:� Ls UMINAIRE j `�9- � �\ r `\ Iv O 56 1 SF UCHi .1-HOX I \ 20 SF r I. \A, ! f I 2SR , , \ o SITE SERVICES I _ I. TURN -AROUND TO BE / 14 vy � \ I'� REMOVED AND � � 4 4 ( - _ - � \ A�i '�. � \ 15 � I rn K L AK GOLF /,' i i' �- ' �' s \\ •6' I LLC SEVER: `. -- - -- - CONNECTED TO PLAT 11117 SF�' LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST. «! - .�., 43 I I I $ \ 26 eo t I WA ER. LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST. �.Mao, 1 U I 42 �, I 41 �6 I - SCHOOL: FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DIST. a j 0042 SFNO. 21 1 , �� ��, 'ry �\ �'-t I 7516 SF I 7245 SF \ 20 25'R \ / ► i ; FIR =. KING COUNTY FIRE DIST. NO. 39 0 �o;5'__ . -- j _ J` L\.\ '. 7445 Sr � ;� 25�� � , � �� I �% TELEPHONE: QWEST . ��o \ �� �' i t '- -7� �T - - - -- - �o - - 7277 SF , i t ,1 ELECTRICAL & GAS: PUGET SOU Iko o a � r - - - - -, - - - - _ J - ,� 15' ORAINGE SOUND ENERGY sr �� ���,� \ i 1 72' ! j 72' T . �,�' 72, ESMT. R \ . 2 CABLE T.V.: COMCAST OMEGA \ `'` '`' Fr „f 3�J I I i 1 1 72' \ 5'R'-,, `ro. �� �� INTL. -�>,�, :. ��,:• � ' � , � I `�_ i ` � -�, ' � wE D o / , � I EXIST. 15' DRAINrAGE i I I I I 102 / 2 I EASWNT (REC. NO. j j� /� INVEST. `` ,V 7480 FI I �j 7 I I �3 8 I I I I 4 0 j I �0 5.R SF �/ i �gy302 SF ! 1 120020204000039) " a" 1 \ /`1 _ T TS \y �% 36 �I I 72C?0 SF I 39 I I 7871 SF �� �ro �, �� Y : I �/i TRACT A: DRAIN,4;L/ WATER QUALITY 14465 SF P T.L. 25 �' ` x29 I' ! I P \ 720o SF I 72 sF % ,� \d, ;-- _ 3 TRACT B: DRAINA{�%WA TERQUALITY.UaLIC \\ \ ' I oo - - I _ 7316 I I -� 3p C62 SF PUBLIC I I � 1 fit• I z 40 - - - - �- - - - - - - - - -- - - , - _- --- g TRACT : LAND i, PE: 13353 SF - HOMEOWNERSASSOC. , � S;,A \_ -70� o w , I HOMEOWN I� I _ i �--------- TRACT D: LANDS, : - �, A S -'T- • PE 610 SF HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. 72 1 J 2 2 .4' �o g ` \ 7200 SF _ _-+ Nt TRACT E. PEDES'IAN ACCESS: 2980 SF - PUBLIC STEVEN . -- WEISMAN I : 34 `\ A ,, 'OaR`�o ` o ` �`�o \- �--` - -fir- ! TRACT F: PEDESTPIAN ACT. 2140 SF - PUBLIC I g ACCESS TRACT: I I 7769 SF 3 3 - - S W 3 4-0 t it ,00'R \ �� -- _ TRACT G: SENSI Ti'✓E AREA WETLAND: _ . T H ��----�. Y \ �azt TRACT H � ERS ASSOC. o- DL.31 % / 7215 SFC _ - SCf+ SO. 1 22 -� AC . LAND E 2 -.5 / W TL ND• 16444 SF HOME W - \- �.. \ 7 -- _ _ SF HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. _ 85 s HOMEOWNERS -� �. LANDSCAPE \ \ 20o SF \ - - , 8 o 8 SF, ' -- 40• TRACT B � \ �,-----. _ __. _ - -� __� .\ / 60;' 67.3' NOTE: A 10° WIDE BUFFER SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN ANY RESID. 67.3 DRAINAGE ,'_; 12I 67.3 67.3' 26 �. STRUCTURE ADD THE TOP OR TOE OF A FILL SLOPE OR A CUT SLOPE - _ \ .�6 k�sT 2 SF ?� -- \ GREATER THAT' 8' IN TRACT.. G s£�;. 3 \�\ r -� x 25_ \ I c T HEIGHT. .qs a \ n 1 I ` l I I ; Y 7500 SF--f -�-- __ - i SENSITIVE AREA/�M£ 72 9 sF I� i I __\ _ _ 23 GRAPHIC 1 ?84 I ��, F \ �. SCALE WETLAND Q 30 ;�a 29 2 I\ 472 s ..z-_ I \ o �5 ,O� SF 7201 SF lol ',7201 SF 16444 SF \ 9 \ 7201 SF 7 7 018E . 5G 50 200 -7 D I i � 2 >1 f -- "T ( I O y 67,E `� (IN FEET 6 - - II Est J o > - v" yI 1 inch = 50 ft - - .,....,:....,. 2 EXIST. WER EAS ENT 1 .. 1 '' I FILE - 02630-00- IMLLAH 67'3' ..1. - -fn ��� SF �� SU s'E � � � - 4 � CITY Y NO 03 1 CROW ,5 -rA_ TA-2 TA-3 \ \ EX `-- v-107�' - - \- - � 1800 ,� I I " - - � �- 28 I n� �F \ .� I I 8 58 44 E ?.74' S line f the N 4 1 Government Lot o a2 - � _ _ TA-4 T7 A T \ y �� I I ? �'���. �. ... 3. 4 .� ` 41� WAS ,fDRYCO JOHNi ly �� \ EXIST. 15' SAN SEWER- 9 I I , x \ \� \ 1 ND �f BAR W/CAP 4� NELSON i ?' TA-7 / ,_,0 EASMENT (REC. 0. - - - - - - - - - - - I I \ 1 LS 189 2 DRYCO �� w -� I \ _TEA 9 20010312000348� - -I I PLAT OF OR HID LANE R S %. 2 �'�� 101 " w Surveying, h%-orporated � CL 26 TA-8 - TA-11 RS 7• % 1 8 I I 20 L (HARBOUR HOMES} �-"OPEN k 1 12714 VALLEY AVENUE EAST ��' I414b TR A T B C R EC J P E N I I SUMNER, WA 98290 `�j� ol�°�¢' I 253-826-0300 FAX 25-3 F26-9703 ONES alfI AL LAN REVISIONS: 1. PER CITY 1 2. PER CITY REVIEW 5/10/04 V z 111 W w Q ` � !^� CL_ �r'7 T o i^ 0 z Q)00� ( r� lJ N Lo 00 z N W cf, Z o r. W V W W W z w � 1 i _ O Q U1v�L6 ` CL W 0 a 0- M I w Q •tt ac Q c r U a 6 U DATE: 3 14 03 SCALE: 50' DESIGN BY: DRWN. BY: JJJ APP, BY: JOB No. SHEET OF REM,- JiA�A 0 2 zo-L14 CiT Y OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. ;EC 11-: 1 V E D F FEDERAL WAY LDINQ DEPT. RECEIVF,D J A N ) A 0 4 ',-' ITY OF FEDEPAL WAY QUILDING DEPT. I 16 Fir / 20 �k 18"Fir \ �' A PORTION of the S.W. 1 /4, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 N., RANGE 4 E., W.M. , 12»Fir Fir 12»Fir / 22"Fir 16"Fir ---------------,_...---------------------- 20Fir 18"Fir / 22»Fir » 14"Fir / 18 Fir 26 Fir » t EXEMPT TREE REMOVAL » 14"Fir 26 Fir \ �� �� 18 Fir 16 Fir 20"Fir " FUTURE R.O.W. TREES TO BE REMOVED: , ,� / 22"Fir 16 Fir , � I Fir / / ��" j / 30 Fir 20 i �'' I / 12th AVE. SW: 118 TREES I / 20"Fir 26"Fir 12"Fir " 14"Fir `` / 12th PL SW: 40 TREES 18"Fir 12 F /� 12"Fir �� \ � ��u � \ 13th CT. SW: 11 I '� / 14"Fir " Q"Fir / 4"$' i \ ti SW 339th ST.: 57 12 Fir 18 Fir / 'Fir I / 16"Fir 1 0„F i �� \ ��` � \ �� TOTAL: 226 ❑ C 1 1 q4 »Fi „ . 22 Fir / „ I ❑ 84bIN 20 Fi 18"Fir / 2 'srirFIRI " r» �� \ `\ � \ I l / 20"Fir LIMITS "Fir 14"Fir ♦ ., '\K \ �`� �� �� c \ TREES TO BE REMOVED FOR ORCHID 12"Fir 16"Fir „ / 2�" F' Fir„ 18 r\� „, ,a \ P LANE SEWER & DRAINAGE EASEMENT: 16"Fir 30"Fir 14 20/F 12 Fir ��F7 v \ o 1 DRAINAGE ESMT EAST P.L.: 36 I » . 20"F, 22"Fir , 0"Fir ` 20"F' 2,. 2„Fi 12"fir »F r� ��; \ \; `� P r�\ ��\ I 18 Fir 12"Fir18 Fir „ 14it it 18 '1 » \ \ \ SEWER ESMT, SW P.L.: 8 I 26"F* 20 R F,r 1 "Fir '. �� ` �`��, �� TOTAL: 44 14"Fir 12"Fir 16"Fi i IR22" 0 Fir I 2 16„ .r N"FrN F\» 20"Fir 16"Fir / Fir 0"Fir \1 Ki 18"Fir \� \ ��;�\\ I ❑ k 378 TOTAL TREES REMOVED FOR R.O.W. & I �ALD15 20"Fir / FIR2 R 20"Fir14„Fr F' r » \ ` \ OFF -SITE SEWER & DRAINAGE: 270 I / 12 Fe ��R 14 Fir " Fp 1►6 Fir 1 \ �� �\ \ I Al 406 3 "/ir 0"Rr 1 2 / 20"Fir . R22" » 12 F» y�, FIR40 20 Fir 16 Fir 16 FI �' „ 1 "Fir\ k " 2'/ " 20"Fir\ 12"Fir E`d,� 12 Fi "Fir \ �� \ ,` `� ♦ �� I / � 376 30"Fir / 22 F i4„F r 28 C1 1 r 20`F Ir 4"Fir 12„ i " 1\Flx�� Fir 20"Fir FIR36 1 {� 18 Fi CLEARING 20"Fir "Fir 6"Fir 12"Fir " 12 F r » 1 r 12 Fib \ LIMITS TYP\ CED30" / " 1 Fir 16 Fir 16\Fir\ 375 " ! 18 . it Q Cedar , " \ \� \ ," 2} RIM-284.60 ' ?ten` I 26 Fir FI 22 87 " 12 I 16 Fir \\ ` `� IE C S=2 7 I FIR40 ,� ' / " 12"Fir 30"Fir 12"Fi "Fir 2 Fir „ \ \ \\ ` \ 2 Fir 4" 26" r 16 Fi» » 18 Fir 1 14"Fit \ \ SIGN ` \� 15 NOMEASUREMENT �> i FIR 371 30"Fir / » f- „- 141 is . it 12"Fir` \\ \ ♦ �� FIR36 Z- FIR36 / 16 Fir " 30 Fir " r 18 Fir FF „ , 14 Fir » 1 Z Ft 5.0 » 1 Fr 0 FI 2 it 12 Fir V 16 Fir 12"Fir I R „ 4»Fir 20 i22$FIR2d' F 'Ir t 12 2 r 1 „ 16"Fi 14"Fir » . 367 20"Fir 16"Rr � � » . 14 Fir FIR36 12 Fir 2 3 IF r „ „ \ \\ \ „ . Fi FIR it 3 /�„ .1,8+ Fir , it 22"Fir 12 Fir 12 i� 14" ir 16"Fir 6„Fir \ \�\ cs 26 Fir 'If FhR10„ "Fir l� � .�r..?'Fir _ 8»Fir 18"Fir 12"Fir \ ��� •� , „ \ • I 20"Fir FIRj1 " 14 r 78 32 Flr 20"Fi „ 16"Fir 14"FIr 16"Fir WA1ER\+1tFER `\ :\'\ CE 10" » 6 Fi 58 Fir » tr » 12"fir 1 `� \\ \ TEL LU AIRE 365 FIR24' 14 F 18"F' 1 3 26 Fir 16 Fiti4 Fi \ \\ \`. FIR48 »7 TOP— 3, FIR30" 20"Fir , „ 1 •��` r 14 i 1 —1 r <1 i — - 366 CEDIKD3o 1 1 i » \ \\ \ et I FIR22" I 12"� �---- .�sF"Ear " 1 r \ \\\ J-B FIR48 � 1 Fir12 I I » 12 Fir it \\ � � ` �� ! 26"Fir 14 1 16"Fir FI „ 12Nir GJ 11 "Fir 20"Fir 16' it 18" ��ir r GRAD1„Fir + \ \ „ . 26"F' » / „1 4 14"Fir 4 i t 1 s Fir LIMITS \� 30 Fir Fir ( 26 Fir » `T4' _"--"'--4 ' ` M� \ \- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - --- 337 -- 4 " SSMH RIM=288.34 \ j F1R30 26 Fir 1 48 14 F r _ LI> . " ` 18 Fir b NO MEASUREMENT "1 \ i / 30 Fir -'-- -... 2 Fir 14 Fir I+ r � \ \ 1 20"Fir 339 26 i I "Fir 464 „ . --� 18"Fir �» ! RP I FIR36 343 I 30 Fir O 12 Fi I i Fir FIR3 /- FIR48 15 I rn » . — "Fir I I -IR60 b ti 1» 30"Fir F 361 � � � 16"Fir '8"Fir I 4 5 6*2 _ +6.. ' 1 Ml-0 » . 7 12"Fir J I R48 - 30 Fir -L-----_— / 1 18 T� I 362 J 20"Fir 26"Fir �9 i I I FIR30 j 4 ` 16 26"F•r !"Fir16"Fir it ---------------------� � / FUTURE N---/// MULTI -FAMILY LOT Ir CLEARING LI,IITS I 363 358 DEVELOPMENT 3 r 1 "F 14"Fir 18„Fir 18� t I BIR24*3 FIR 20 it _.. _. ._..,__ .,. ._ 6 I /`'� - 467 118" r 12"Fir FIR 6 1 » r 14"Fir 18" AP�2 _ 47 34 , 17 0"Fi -12"Fir r R36 FIR 6 469 '1 I � ` � FIR36 j / TREE REMOVAL SUMMARY: FIR36 30"Fir 46 � � � 5 2 Fir 5 12"Fir CLEARING I •p 26"Fir\ FIR „ 18"Fir i — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — NORTH LINE GOVERNMENT LOT 2 _ _ S 88*58'44" E 1274.3 / 3 kir 30 Fir AL12 Fir IMITS (TYP) ----- _ _ TO�Im ES ON -SITE: - - - - - - 16"Fir 12"Fir 18"Fir AL EXISTING THE 630 lip FIR�F �` - ""'- - ` - - - - - -EXEMPT TREES TO BE REMOVED: 270 20"Fir FIR24*2 \ 18 12"Fir - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL NON-EXEMPT TREES: 360 1 FI 14"Fir 25% MIN. TREE RETENTION: 90`�. 12"Fir 4 16"Fir O LUMINAIRE / ` 1 K ` 18"Fir t TREES TO BE SAVED: LIGHT J-BOX / FiR16 FIR24*2-All FIR „ \ 3 14"Fir F1R42 FUTURE LOT 45. 20 CB REM=355.96 „ ` 1 ' \ �-. 44 .� � � � � � FUTURE LOTS 35-39/42-44: IE 12" ADS W=351.41 FIR18 1 ` 1 ` �. -- D 3 \ 2 /` \\ IE 12 ADS NE=353.04 FIR24" FIR�8" 1 F 20�' GRADING- `�-49� FUTURE LOTS 30-32: 13 IE 12" ADS ESE=351.51 FIR12" 20 it ` ' D24* FUTURE LOTS 21-29: 70 FIR12" 43 FIR20 I 41 \ EAST PROP. LINE: 8 FIR14" FIR14"64" 26 14"Fi FI "14"ALD20" 42 F 3 FIR42" R4 FIR6 NORTH PROP. LINE: 6 12"Fir 12"Fir r ALD18" FIR24" „ 4 ? `77 �" TOTAL TREES TO BE SAVED: H/C RAMP FIR22" FIR1 FIR32 1 FI FlR "Fir r�^ * 1 r'� \ \ I F ,. 1 i3" , 164Fi \ \ I ALD1�;b� ALD20 FIR32 FlR' 0 FIR121R12' I`\ » % IR16 ,. R28 18 Fir F' rim 18" \ �, IR28 28" �IR30' FIR32" H/C RA �R•0 ALD20" 3 � FIR18" FIR16 ( �'D 14"Fir " �� -__ •� ALD20" 39 FIR1 40 FIR36" 563 ir Dj D1 , 2" I 37 R14 3 8 `, A9' 4 FI 2 MAP 30 Fi FIR24" , LD14" 4,. R20" 36 I F R148,�I�t14"/ ' FIR34" FIR2 ALD24 2 16"Fir 3 AN'� 2 18" IF M �a 1 i r ►`� �C,� F 12"Fir l Q 6 Fir 14" Fir t 12"Fir FI 0.>» L14" ALD 22 4 10 r I Fir Yv` F D18" ALD 18 ALD2 FIR20" 1 2" / 3\ 18"Fir / 16 I ALD1 A ALD18 F R 0" FIR40 ,. 30 \ ALD1» I 48„ CC dp�16, 24, ,. FIR4 /\ "Fir 1 18'Ft` 1 it I ALD78 q 0 FIR30 40 �, 10"Fir FIR18" ��34 \ 1g„ » �' ""�... "' .' _ — 26 Fir 1 ` 12"Fir IR�2'r I 14"Cedar FIR14 „ ALO / "Fir ' AL 18' Val / \ 12"Fir ` 16"Fir I' 10"Fir F }g'CE " CED10" FIR28 1 it I �,v „ ' � _, 30„ ALD22" ALD18" _ _ \ 4»Fir ,i I 34 R36 `-'�3 �+p18' 36" ALD18" ALD18" _ / \ \ 2216"Fir � 1 r FI 36" 25 L LDI0ALD10' GRADING 20" .� "gill F 18"Fir .` D 2 1 Fir j j -n> A6D10 LIMITS ... „ I ' "Modron� 20 FI 32" Fir / 25 , \ 14"Fir \ / 5G t R1 E51 " ` TRACT B AL ALD14" _FIR1> KZZ FIR12" 40" \ 26 it \ / 30 Fir `DRAINAGE F R14"'``'�' """' �"' FIR12" 532 FIR " FI 32" „ 44 FI1 FIR 3 10"Flr ALD10' `" FIR10 D „ R 2 " ,FlR16 \5 FI FIR14" \ 20 Fir 26 FIR16 FI 48 12"Fi \ ALD12 32 �� c� FIR12 FI, 4>' FIR1� FTR16" FIR14" ' i 10 12"Fir � `�. R 8' 31 - E 20{' FIR20" Q FIR10� FIR22' �� F1R16" » •' �� '' „ 28 FIR10" 27 FIR16 26 'irFIR16" 545 FIP,12_" FIR12" t , M�1D32" A- ' 12 Fir FIR24\ �i 30 F 1 -o 29 FIR32" FIR18" FfR1 "„ FIR36 �11 » 1 fF1i11 " F 241* ✓• '� FIR28" ALD12 FIR 4 „;IR I� \ CED32 CED1 �EC32 6 FIR10" FIR32" IR12 R16" 18 ALD10' \ FIR2 " „ CED12 \ FIr2 FIR10" ` ( FIR12" \ �_: '' \ FIR..;" Flfe '�RADIN R 4' FIRl , 1 20 ALD10 \� \ FI22 2 CED18 �_J 0 `� „ � 547 LIMITS \ _. �� , t, , A M-CO' E2 tJ / „ 30"Fir „ m IR34'FIR20" FIR14 ;! \ F1R20 _ 24 FIR22" 12 Fir FIR1$ FIR2 2� — . _ — — — — — - — — — — tin 20" FriR34" ;, Lr�i FIR22„ I� .� }}� / > FIR1 FI FIR24" , F ,32' `0 ....L .. ... FlR16' I FIR 4" R'11» 1 a FItC l 2 a ��� � �..........� �� ..r +� �� �� —� _� I TA-1 A-2 TA-; 'tt' I I N 88 58 4 W 1004.90 - �- I Iw I 559 FIR24 529 - — — — — - TA TA-5� TA -6 II - I 1 ca 554-`"'.--- 540 MAP36 TA-7 /1-10 1 I~ I FIR24*2 SPKS I I� TA-8 'TA-9 1 1 20 21 I 1TA-11 I I IFND REBAR W/CAP ILS 18902 50 0.10' N 0.09, W I I GRAPHIC SCALE Al 7R RA 1AA ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. b Guy I`( ) 5("t� REVISIONS: V Z_ L- W a� Wa.� Z '�., 06 to 0) VN�L� zLCI W �, z o j1J/ k V W w w Z 5 z OW .9�ON ��4ea O rl- 16 w CK d .6n _ 6 Q ca Z W Leif r ^Z �! Q W N w O w Q- Csq O OK Z (r) Lu CL , -N� O j �N. [a `" N mox rx Qt� w � 0 w d w 0 DATE: 3 14 03 SCALE: 50' DESIGN BY: JJJ DRWN. BY: JJJ BES APP. SY: JOB No. SHEET OF 1 JAN <i5 J CITY 0F FEIwERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT, G r TREE REMOVAL SUMMARY: EXEMPT TREE REMOVAL SITE PA TA to / + ! ► S C , t-MH` W6T ® H P vP / FUTURE R.O.W. TREES TO BE REMOVED: AREA: TOTAL: 13.49 ACRES ! +++ \\a � . �_ � ,, TOTAL EXISTING TREES ON-6n: 630 AREA: TAX LOT #44: 8.01 ACRES I +� / EXEMPT TREES TO BE REMOVED: 210 12th AVE, SW: 11$ TREES � � AREA: TAX LOT #44: 5.Q1 ACRES I � T ``� \p P TOTAL NON-EXEMPT TREES: 360 12th FL SW: 40 TREES PROPOSED NO. LOTS: 48 ( G& "`+ \\ . DY 25% TREE RETENTION: 90 13th CT. SW: 11 q TONING: RM2400 TAX LOTA44) I �� �-° NCO � H o \ TREES TO BE SAVED: 36 SW 339th ST.: 5'1ZONING: RS 7.2 (TAx LOT 0} I � o �1uuu /1 \ \ TREES TO BE REPLACED: 54 TOTAL: 226 E `� PROPOSED DENSITY: 3.18 UNITS/ACRE ) \ 1U ►n++"`` r,' \ G \� N ilutu�%/ •r UT\ TREES TO BE REMOVED FOR ORCHIDp ROPOSED USE: SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESID. I �' �P \ 6.a�a6T P s� \ �,,,,„ LANE SEWER 4 DRAINAGE EA$EM5NT: 3S2 G 1 p G \ \� s oP \uluu 111 • .X a; , ``' N o "F ��� `� P DRAINAGE ESMT, BAST P.L.: 3$? ul B GS SEWER E&IT SW P,I...: k SG All E o �: i� - H P 00 TOTAL: 44 �60 GS R ut «� '�rii \\\� ,,� ,�' �� � \ � PS'' TOTAL TREES REMOVED FOR RO.W. d VICINITY MAP I 3s ` ��/u OFF -SITE SEWER 4 DRAINAGE: 210 N.T.S. \ cp �u\101t1!/y u/// , � !1/ + 0\10\ P \RB 3 `p SEE TREE PLAN PREPARED BY :jAEGER tNGINEERIN(x FOR EXISTING ` TREES, LOCATIONS, SIZES, R36 � "�`'' \\`�`� �� �/1/' � •' i\°\ 1 % � \ ,;, 2\ � Y, 4 NOTES, REMOVALS AND TREES TO BE SAVED. � I , 6 \ '\ k � ��� \\�� 66 ' I � \ SI STREET TREE LEGEND i \ G \FlR36 FIR36 00 �� O / '� 4 r7 I l I \'/' R30 1 12' + y • I I 0 , ��\\ ' \ \ 68 ACER RU5RUM 'REIN SUNSET' RED SUNSET MAPLE 3' CAL. 30'O.C. ` ' I FlR36 BOOSu/1//� Q \ \ ro c + Pw �' a lye + ► „ 0 i ' T A T . ( P r / s7 �s • 6 TRWC D DR NA E ;, \ / ® FIRS \ \ \ ,�' •—' , � I w LA SC P ''co �: 1 HTS Lo Fx6cl \ ��' t lli.,� �� luuv,,� �\\ uul//lio,G �� 13 LIQU{DdmER 6TYRACIFLUA SWEETCUM 3' GAL. 30' OC. 366 to ,3 1-' '2' ( cv F ' ' 36 �\ \\36E03 ' rn `, 14 '`, ' w \ "o FlR48 8 Co :. o rID uA rn 1 OD 43 QUERCUS COCCINEA SCARLET OAK 3' CAL, 30' O.C. -� Y--------------- 4 0 GS CG 8\ 2 5 I \ \ cam+ o II Q d� ( �� R48 �� o \ �' 2 26 ACER PLATANOID S 'CRIMSON KING' C S A G H A LI E GS \ \� RIMSON KING MAPLE 3 cAl. 30 o.c. ( Fl� ` w R. HIGH 1 60 - i / FIR \ \ \ r \� FIR24 '' \ UA CA r MAD Fl 30 t -i r' r CP I , `�� �, -0 REPLACEMENT TREES -------------------- 1 } \ ?, b \FR �, \ �o _-----^--_J I RP G FIR '•• '� " \ , 103 "JLTI-0 It, + , �, , ' \ z f \ w 59 1='SE.iDOTSUGA MENZIE f DOUGLASFIR 10' HT. 20-30, O,C, GS \ LOT D L T �� \ �� \ _{� . _ c� W�llarinn\\�4 11\ W mom RR36 � 'to -� _ \ 1 � �3 03`�-rU,� Pi ANTING STRIP AND DRAINAGE AREA PLANTS _..5% MAP 2 w g '•z. �• _ M \ c1 cps \ �, _ ;t a. \+!' AU AS kEQ D ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URS( KINNIKINNICK i GAL. 3' O.C. Ti (NGULAR \ 376 Q O (�� FlR36 \ 07 y y J °�" FlR48 Qv s to THREE R�tJJ� -- — — -- — — — _ .._ _._. _._. — _... — _ —_..._._NORTH LINE GOVEIRNMENT LOT 2 � 1 z�j� � s \ 26 __\ o o 113 MAHONIA AQWIFOLIUM OREGONG;kAPE 5 GAL. , RP �\ 0 .5 _ 6 O.C. t 4 R S w7 I Q� t , PT Z2 \ r ` \� — LUMINAIRE I ^� I \ \ FlR� \ 40 . 52 NO 1 ES LIGHT J-BOX �'� �, z� R • �b \ 32 rn w c / 2 �� GS ,� �� _ �- ��, INSTALL COMPOSTED TOPSOIL 1N PLANTING STRIP AREAS AND Cr-. AT EACH 3 �8 ` PERIMER IRE PIT, CB RIM=355.96 6 ( 3 IE 12" ADS W=351.41 '� v', \ a 1-1 6 \— \ IE 12" ADS NE=353.00 `'� INSTALL 3 DEPTH BARK MULCH IN PLANTING / � \ RP � ' � `. SZ va � 8 . � BEDS AND 5 DIAMETER R(Nt� IE 12' ADS ESE=351.5 / 0 ( 1 1 1 0 ♦ AT EACH PERIMETERTREE. ., ,� FlRas \ O � t I (6/ ui 42 Io ti a � INSTALL NOS SM2420 ROOT BARRIER IN 10 STRIPS ON BOTH STREET AND 6IDEWALK :r • "' = r� "' \ \ \ ° SIDES OF ALL STREET TREES 3• s m ` 0 �. b '' m 2 d d /\ REE REE PER M,�NUFACT'URERS DETAILS. Iji RP J M �� PROVIOE ONE YEAR WRITTEN WARRANTY FDR ALL PLAIN MATERIALS. Co H/C RAMP F / 69 5 /72' 7' 10 . G4 \ 3 ,� /j-� \ PRDVIiE WATER AS 1EQ D TO INSURE PLANt SUjRY{VAL< -- I -- 1ir :�• / "' ' INSTALL 5-21 GRAM AdzRIFOW PLANT' TA S \ \ ( �,o`„�o o I \- ;`�1 721% , �� \J �I !f3 AT 1/2 ROOTPALL DEPTH PER TREE AND �o °L \ 72 Gs 72 72 6 5 I� N� �y \ 1 TAB PER GROUND COVER, H/C RA � / 3� LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL UNSERGkoUND UTILITIES BEFORE INSTALLATION \ •. w �•' , ,.•' �� � � � OF PLANT 38 �\ Gs z. _ \ '�- \ \ \ MATERIALS. NI I % I w RP 40 P �• ' \ 334 V, OBTAIN ALL PERMITS AND PROVIDE ALL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED. v `� 36 �` of �`�° 38 0 3 I 336--= CI 5105UAL E 4 POND HYDR05EED MIX 36 FlR � \ '\ \,�.i \ R'� — M N •}j. CQ \ � C�a° ~ A \ALD24 _.._.. — _ — �rt°i �II ' o ..k •h' •, »• • .' .-'Lj / 1 \\,�i'9-' 4 �-" , ;,,f---_- \`\ 3Q2 ELYMU CLAUCU5 41510 FESTUCA RU5RA 40% DE6CHAMF51A CAESPIT 06A 10r4 J56'YZIGACHNE 1fQ BECKM� NIA S I 33 \�\ �/ _ 60 � --�\ 3Q� GLYCERIA OCCIDENTAL15 2ro _ SEED 4TE $LB./1 00 S.F. 1 2ta-20 AT i++\ �. Gs ,• 0 362 3S ,0 0- LE .A,000 F. i5p, _moo ��\\ \\ AC so' zm _ s \ 36 �a -�--_ �- \ moo\ �\ \3 o WOOD FIBER MULCH AT 2,000 L15JACRE WITH V TACK 3QJ r sc r/ EA. DR NA ��� � '� �\ , �— s � 368 , ;. �_ � \ � � 36 --- � o \ \ � ^ / r--- r0 '1 36 :�•i S� DMoUOI15 TRCC SPKS I 3 _ \ \O s6 ruxr rat twecr \ 38 I "� c�o /' �— `^` • ii atAw oac Louc ROanWL Dew. i010' \ i 1!/lltll\\0� � 4 s + sTAM To Brace �ntom Tm 10 F2;FIr O O 3 O 2 2 +� j"-372� ' -374 - _ \ FlR 36 8 cti as neIr sras .3 Q 7 j• �� `-�'"'' " 36 •• nT nr TWICE as TRcc sTa� �! 3 0 r umk saac rua+ �,,�� • RooTeui cwc + $T $T IT �� \ \ r Dlsrac eDcr ` 4 00 J ` �f / FlR48 \� \ 3a 362 AND ROOM[ WIK .• 3 r LAYLR AM 2' &W NLt " mt9b ma to p \ $o \ �, `3i \ nASIaT r DISN[D woo ,rt�r or tysen g- /2 fir IiiB"� \ ^"• \ \ / FlR36row / / / FlR48 \ ,+ MATH! X M n�D OF 1+� VW CC= F `15• IS .' ESEIut(? 67.� 67.3�8 7 r FlR24 368 -./ by �,5 2 36 nwrrtr,w+cc� or +RQ10YE s>w rt \ 1 REC..1r 107.7 FlR20 \ \ • i. NATW 804 M �� T 4 -1 TA-3 6 �' Rl2" N $i3'S' 4 W 1 - ?���—� "'• 3. �� ow a' RooTDA1L NATHC sG< MO( 'J3 ("' TA- j5v'0 3 \ 4.�a FI a•2 � � 3 6' TREE STAKMCs 1ETAIL S PLMTMCs PeTAIL GONIi`EROU TREE STANNG I o ' 66 368 3) \�\3 +l -- \� rtta xTs6 TA-4 TA-6 O 2 �� 3$ 376 \ \ 1 0� CITY OF F CE '�L 1�(; 5N 1\ ^� ++v I 374 --' 72 \ BUILDING L)EPL N .D TA-7 a-10 I�1 FLAT OF ORCHID LANE �°� \ �, �� �O DSC; P AND TREE 1 PL.A� M NT 'L•AN GS \ ^j �j /� �� 1 ' 380 GS3 6' File Name .�� TA-11 BRAD PLEMMON.5 W YN5 TONE Date: �-23�m3 tSheet Scale. t = 9m Ll 10 T ST SE PRELIMINARY PLAT MAP Drawn By: D.B.L. AUBURN, WA. 9800 EAGLE IGN Phone: (253) �39--16 1 Approved By: ES of ,r- _� 26007 NE 27th DR. REDMOND, WASHINC�TON 98053 1 F-ax: (253) 939-617 . �2th A 1lE. SW &' SW 33$fh ST. Revised: TEL. (425) 898-'8833 1 FAX. (425) 868-•2164 _\\V\ V101 kx\- ' \ \ `\` \ \ \ O \ A PORTION of \ the S.W. 1 /4-, SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 21 N. RANGE 4 E. W.M. \ �\ \ 70` ROW 1 SLOPE EASEMENT S NEEDED . 6' LANDSCAPE STRIP � / � �'\ I • ' SIDEWALK RECONFIGURE INTERSECTION FOR g' 18 3' UTILITY STRIP AN LEFT TURN LANE ONTO 10th AVE SW. 29' ROUGH GRADE HALF WIDTH FUTURE ROAD & PAVEMENT \ c / \ / \\ \ R !\ z \ `� / GOADING \ SIDEWALK LI TS // / \ �. �\ \ \ �� \ I\ P i 7' ADDITIONAL R.O.W. \ \ N \ WN l l TO BE DEDICATED TO ,\ \ �� \ D \ THE CITY THICKENED EDGE - ASPHALT CURB N \\ ��\ El 1 I k AG�IA IE 1) \ \ TYP SECTION 1Oth AVE. SW LOT 44 FRONTAGE �60 �1 P OP41D �� . \ \� \ Atl \ P R 1 C TOUR 1 / .� `� ` \ 1 Ln EX STING „^ CO TOUR / I ��t \ ' �',� \ \ / \ TOP ALL: 11 • �C. \ . IOT5 � 7LL/ .0 16.0 \ \ , \ \ \ \ 1f C T OT 3 GS / \ �s � \ \ 97 � � � ( 1 GE\ i \ \ LA DS PE SE RATE` PR \ \ OP W L: 3 0 I \ A1'ER R 3 �� DRAI AGE�AC1Lt \ \I \ B T W4L: 3.0 ( I r',fl �t \� X LUt�TNAIRE-�� �. 0 1 66 SHALL BE P 0 I \ o \ , GRA NG \ OT 45 \ I \ } \ \` 10 I \ \LIMITS \ 1 TDP- ` 368 �36� `14 ` T WALL 312 \ \ ,�' \ \\ \ ( 1 \I \ o \ \BO WALLS. 306. T. 4 ` \ \ \ \ o \ TOP WALLS: 3iZ.0 \ W -------------------------� T\ LCS` 305 �\� :•��8 �\ \ RM2400 _ \ \ \ �\�6 \ \\ \\ \ \ \ `\SSMH RIM=288.3 / \ \\ I ` 35' 5' \ \— —� \ \ \ NO M ASUREMEh1T�� \ \ -SAGHALIE \ , \\ \ \ �� �$ o \TOP 1KLS:\316. s \ \ \\ 7 0� OT W LS: \� 08,0 r,RP Q \ \ � 1 3\,CO \ Q \ o \ \ 'r� ----- / DOUBLE 4' HIGH RETAINING / \� WALLS 103\ I� (BENCHED), 5' APART WITH LAN \ DSCAPING IN R MULTI- \ 6' , 1 '' 1 ��\ `�' �-- ` o FRONT OF LOWER FUTU M l MILY � , ` 1 \\\ � WE WALL AND BETWEEN (; \ \ LOT DE LOPMEN\\ \ s ,\ 13 " \ \ \ WALLS. 5 \ 1\ 1 40 \\ I M RS 7 GR ING TOP WALLS: 322.0 IMIT \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 I �, ,,; BOT WALLS: 314.0 I \ I NORTH LINE GOVERtyMEPaT LO? 2 '44-E 22\ 1 \ \ �~ TOP WALLS: 326.0 1 �64 0 0.3 — �I °J BOT WALLS: 322.0 \ I j in —� I I i 6.1 N 11 •i\'— \ ' 1 9.5 110 j i i l i R S 7.2 , i -s,. --- �- LUMINAIRF i I i 4�cr ^� / \ �9\ R ` ! \19 \ - r \ 3 EXISTI ` \ - ''� i IGMT J-BOX 2 I CONTOUR TURN -AROUND TO BE \, i � � � � REMOVED AND, / 4 4 \x CONNECTED T4 PLATOPO o \ \ g \ 1 CO TOUR Ln 1 \ �' 1 ``\+l i•',� ' "I Lrl 2 R \ 0"�C AL RAp,! 4 i \ � � o� DG. ( J C / 1 5 % 2� 6T j \ 8 E VELO \ •; c — — I 10 \ - / / 15 PRANGE \ o +� 72' V 72� / I 1 \ �\ /j �0 E TI I f I E N;�T. \ '., R S 7 2 !a/� h2Atvlf�;� .._ �� 0 '� �j6 / 72' 72 5, 1 ,�� �WE \ //\/ BIDS, ''I I �'\ `ram ' ~~�� ; N. v`v�-•.".• / 40 N I V1 i 38 36 M r GRADING of r 9 \. LIMIT \ 'o i<�7N I p,a R -+. i ' 0 ✓ ✓ \ o ` Y,\\ Sg 8' HIGH REINFORCED FILL ROCK WALL 7 _ 72' \ /- / �'8 - %�\ \ �1.21,,. \ \ \ _ o `r - . 0 \ _ OR CONC. RETAINING WALL. try \ 25.4' I \ \ \ \ \ \ '-� --�- z TOP: 350.0 �� W ' "cp - BOT: 342.0 4 \ _ D \ o ' I �RADING �3\4 38 1\�®`j4�, _ 3 0 v \ 0 •_ _ Lt ITS o M — \ I - - --- ' �1, — _ NG - — tea, ---- - - 3 _ \ \ _4- DI\ �,• TR C T B 60' 67.3 67.\ \C / I So \ S£ \ / \/ Co �;;rr 2 F' �� 6 \ LIMITS _� 36 L---- \ �� E.: w £ASEM£ D IN N GE --� "'.._ I \ — — _r \ - --� .� �6 , \� � TR A�� G �� 3 / \ I - j �� ho - _moo �\ �3s GRAPHIC SCALE �! SENSITIVE \A(3EA\ _\ \` I �3�4 i i �° \ � _...� — - 3,,o 23 . ` BSc 50 0 25 50 100 i WETLAND \ \ o 30 I 29 1382 \ \ \ \ I \S6 (IN FEET GRADING ' 3 ,\ '� .� 0 1 inch = 50) ft. \25. ' IST. WER EAS ENT 67 3' 368-� 2 4 \ 354 TA-2 TA 3 �c�C� 'S 6, \ l 1 T� CP � 65 `��8 , j, \ , I 8 58 44 E- 0 �.7 IS �ne �f the N 412' of G6ver;ent Lot 2 5 DRYCO TA-g a,37 --'- \ DRYCO jy \ Iv I -� ---��\\ FND`8 BAR W i C A� �' �Q I � A 7 �---'� ' �c 7 ��� PLAT OF OR HID LANE RS 2.`Y Surveying, Incorporated i y i j,r, -, 12714 VALLEY AVENUE EAST - SUMNER, WA 98390 253-826-0300 FAX 253-826-9703 i 200