Council PKT 05-17-2005 Special/Regular
A Federal Way
City Council Meeting
AGENDA
CO UN CILMEMBERS
Dean McColgan, Mayor
Jeanne Burbidge
Jack Dovey
Eric Faison
Jim Ferrell
Linda Kochmar
Mike Park
CITY MANAGER
David H. Moseley
Office of the City Clerk
May 17, 2005
1.
II.
III.
1.
II.
Ill.
a.
b.
c.
d.
IV.
AGENDA
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers - City Hall
May 17, 2005
(www.cit)lojjederalway,com)
* * * *
Study Session - 5:00 I!:!!!:.
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
CITY CENTER MARKET STUDY FINDINGS
ADJOURNMENT
!k,2ular Meeting - 7:00 I!:!!!:.
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PRESENTATIONS
Proclamation/Korean Peace Day
Parks & Recreation Commission Introductions/Certificates of Appointment
Introduction of New Staff/City Manager
Emerging Issues/City Manager
CITIZEN COMMENT
PLEASE COMPLETE THE PINK SLIP & PRESENT TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING,
Citizens may address City Council at this time, When recognized by the Mayor, please come!orward to the
podium and state your name/or the record PLEASE LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE (3) M1NlITES.
The Mayor may interrupt citizen comments that continue too long, relate negative~y to other individuals, or are
otherwise inappropriate.
(Page ] t~l3)
v.
CONSENT AGENDA
Items lisled below have been previous~y reviewed by a Council Committee of three members and brought b¡:lore
/Úll COlmciljbr approval; all items are enacted by ONe motion. Individual items m{(F be removed by a
Councilmemberjòr separate discussion and subsequent motion.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
L
g.
h.
.J.
J.
k.
l.
m,
11.
o.
p.
q.
V1.
a.
b.
VII.
a.
Minutes/May 3, 2005 Regular Meeting
Vouchers
Monthly Financial Report/March 2005
Council Bill #368/Cingular Franchise Agreement - Enactment Ordinance
Council Bill #369/Christjan Faith Center Franchise - Enactment Ordinance
Police Pool Vehicles for Commandcrs Emergency Response
Amend 2005 CDBG Project for Senior Nutrition & Health Improvements/
New Community Center
Park Maintenance Contract
Northwest Parks FoundationlParks Safety Net Fund Management
Capital Fundraising Campaign Proposal/New Community Center
Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement Renewal
So 336(11 St at I s( Ave So Intersection Improvements/30% Design Status
Lakota Creek East Branch Restoration Project/Bid A ward
Joe's Creek l-1abitat Restoration Proiect/50% Design Status
SW 356111 St Regional Retention Facility Fence Project/Project Acceptance
2005 Commute Trip Reduction (CrR) Program for City Hall (Area
FlexPass)
23rd Ave So & So 314111 St (Private Road) Traffic Signal/Project Acceptance
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
Brown's Point & Dash Point Urban Growth Area - Resolution (postponed
.from January 18, 2005 meeting)
Selection of Voting Delegates for A WC Annual Business Meeting
INTRODUCTION ORDINANCES
Council Bill #370/2004 Comprehensive Plan/Kitts Corner
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S GROWTH
MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, APPROVING A CHANGE IN
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 46
ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 336m STREET AND WEST OF PACIFIC
HIGHWAY SOUTH FROM BUSINESS PARK (BP) TO COMMUNITY BUSINESS
(BC) AND MULTI-FAMILY (RM 2400), BASED ON SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
(AMENDING ORDINANCE NO'S. 90-43, 95-248, 96-270, 98-330, 00-372, 01-405, 03-
442, 04-460, 04-461, 04-462).
(Page 2 of])
VITI.
IX.
X.
a.
b.
c.
XI.
b.
Council Bm #371/2004 Comprehensive Plan/Puget Center Partnership
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S GROWTH
MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, APPROVING A CHANGE IN
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING OF 4.03 ACRES LOCATED
NORTH OF SOUTH 312f'H STREET AND EAST OF 1ST AVENUE SOUTH FROM
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) TO NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS (BN), BASED ON
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS (AMENDING ORDINANCE NO'S. 90-43, 95-248, 96-270, 98-
330,00-372,01-405,03-442,04-460,04-46 J, 04-462).
c.
Council Bill #372/2004 Comprehensive Plan/Amendments to Chapter 5 of
Comprehensive Plan
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S GROWTH
MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AMENDING CHAPTER 5,
HOUSING (AMENDING ORDINANCE NO'S. 90-43, 95-248, 96-270, 98-330, 00-372,
01-405,03-442,04-460,04-461,04-462).
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER REPORT
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.11 O( 4)( 1 )(i)
Collective Bargaining/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.l40(4}(a)
Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.1100)(11)
ADJ OURNMENT
*" THI!: COUNCIL MAY ADD AND TAKE ACTION ON OTHER ITEMS NOT LISTI!:D ON THE AGENDA **
THE COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET IS A V AILABLE FOR REVIEW AT CITY HALL AN )
ON THI!: CITY'S WEBSITE UNDER CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA AND PACKETS~Y()lJ MA Y
ALSO E-SUBSCRIBE TO RECEIVE ONGOING NOTIFICATION OF CITY COUNCIL UPDATES
(Page 3 qf'3)
MEETING DATE:
May 17,2005
ITEM; JL (~9
CITY OF FEÐERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
CATEGORY:
~ CONSENT
tJ RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
BUnGET IMJ) ACT:
0 ORÐINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: Draft minutes of the City Council regular meeting held on May 3,2005
"""""""""mm""'..mm...."""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""........"................"",..............""..
SUMMARY /BACKGROUND:
Oi1ìcial City Council meeting minutes for permanent records pursuant to RCW requirements.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the minutes of the City Council regular meeting held on May 3, 2005."
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
~
~~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
ST
1"- reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
-.---,---
"-~
REVISED - 05t1 Ot2001
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minute!)"
May 3, 2005 - P(lge 1 (~f 7
FED ERAL WAY CITY CO UN CIL
Council Chambers - City Hall
May 3, 2005 - 7:00 p.m.
Draft Minutes
1.
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor McColgan called the regular meeting of the Federal Way City Council to order at
7:03p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Dean McColgan, Deputy Mayor Linda Kochmar, and
Councilmembers Jeanne Burbidge, Jack Dovey, Jim Ferrell, Eric Faison and Mike Parle
Statfpresent: City Manager David Moseley, City Attorney Pat Richardson, and City Clerk
Chris Green.
II.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor McColgan called upon Monda Holsinger of the Federal Way AmeriCorps Team to
lead the flag salute.
MOTION BY DEPUTY MAYOR KOCHMAR TO AMEND THE AGENDA FOR
THIS EVENING'S MEETING, TO ADD TO THE EXECUTIVE SESSION,
~~POTENTIAL LITIGATION," PURSUANT TO RCW 42.30.110(1)(i); SECONDED
BY COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY. The motion passed as follows:
Burbidge
Dovey
Faison
Ferrell
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
III.
PRESENTATIONS
a.
Proclamation/National Elder Law Month
Mayor McColgan read aloud the proclamation, and presented it to Stephanie
HasJem, Federal Way Attorney.
b.
ProclamationlNational Women's Health Week
Deputy Mayor Kachmar read aloud the proclamation, and presented it to J canne
Ziltener and Michelle Parent of the Federal Way Community Health Center.
Federal Way Ci(y Council Regular Meeting Minutes
May 3, 2aOS - Page 2 of 7
c.
Certificate of Recognition/Federal Way AmeriCorps Team
Mayor McColgan read aloud the certificate, and presented it to Monda Holsinger of
the Federal Way AmeriCorps Team.
d.
Introduction of New Employees/City Manager
City Manager Moseley introduced the following new employee:
Jonathan (n) Jimenez is the City's newest experienced Police Officer. Jimenez
comes to Federal Way from the Honolulu, Hawaii Police Department. Jimenez has
a Bachelor's degree in Business Administration from the University of San Carlos
in Cebu City, Philipines. He was unable to attend.
e.
Emerging Issues/City Manager
City Manager Moseley reported no emerging issues at this time.
IV.
CITIZEN COMMENT
Jerry Holdsworth: Gave his support to the proposed position of City ombudslmm.
Kirby Smith: Questioned the need for installing raised curbing and signage at 1 st A venue
south at South 31 ih Street.
Bene Dagan and Jo Ann Kaye: Asked to change the criteria for installing speed bumps in
her neighborhood around Coronado Park, finish fencing across the park, and asked when
the new big toy is scheduled to be installed.
StafInoted that the criteria will be reconsidered at the next Land Use/Transportation
Committee meeting on Jw1e 6th in Chambers at 5:30p.m. Staff will also speak with
Lakehaven about the fencing issue. The big toy is scheduled to be installed around June.
Cristina Jorgenson (Buck & Gordon, representing Cingular Wireless): She urged Council
to approve the Cingular Wireless Jfallchise agreement, and thanked the Law Department
for their efforts in drafting the agreement.
John Wilde: Urged the Council to pass the installation of raised curbing and signage at 1 st
Avenue south at South 3I2th Street.
Mike Robertson and Mary £hlis: Asked the City to try to keep the Dash Point Scout Camp
(Camp Kilworth) as a family public resource.
Florenda Wyatt: Addressed the problem of speeding mini-bikes and flyers being posted on
mailboxes around her neighborhood. Staff will look into the issue of the mini-bikes as it
pertains to the motorized scooter ordinance that was passed last year.
Federal Way City Council Ref(ular Meeting Minutes
May 3, 200S -Page 3 (~f7
v.
CONSENT AGENDA
a.
b.
Minutes/ April 19. 2005 Regular Meeting - Approved
2003 Citywide Pavement Marking Project Acceptance - Approved
1 sf A venue South at South 31 ih Street Access Management - Approved
c.
MOTION BY DEPUTY MAYOR KOCHMAR TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA
ITEMS (a) through (c) AS PRESENTED; SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BURBIDGE. The motion passed as follows:
Burbidge
Dovey
Faison
Ferrell
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
VI.
PUBLIC HEARING
Disposal of Surplus City Propertv/Klahanee Lake Community/Senior Center
Mayor McColgan opened the hearing at 7:38p.m.
.
Staff Report
Management Services Director I wen Wang gave a report on the proposal to
Council.
.
Citizen Comment
'['here was no citizen comment at this time.
.
City Council Action - Approved Resolution #05-445
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER FAISON TO APPROVE THE
RESOLUTION, DECLARE THE KLAHANEE LAKE COMMUNITY
AND SENIOR CENTER AS SURPLUS, AND BEGIN MARKETING
THE BUILDING NOW; SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BURBIDGE. The motion passed as follows:
Burbidge
Dovey
Faison
Ferrell
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
Mayor McColgan closed the public hearing at 7:42p.m.
Federal Way City Council ReKular MeetinK Minutes
May 3, 2005 - PaKe 4 of 7
VII.
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
a. Parks & Recreation Commission Appointments
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER BURBIDGE TO APPROVE THE RE-
APPOINTMENT OF THE FOLLOWING PERSONS TO THE CITY'S
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION TO THREE-YEAR TERMS
EXPIRING APRIL 30, 2008: ADE BRIGHT, CINDY DODGE, FRED
KONKELL; AND TO APPOINT STEVE LEE TO A THREE-YEAR
AL TERN ATE TERM; SECONDED BY COlJNCILMEMBER DOVEY. The
motion passed as follows:
Burbidge
Dovey
raison
Ferrell
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
b. Washington State Department of Transportation 1-5 flaV Lane Project/ Work
Hours - Approved Resolution #05-446
Public Works Director Cary Roe updated the Council on the project, and presented
the proposed resolution. He emphasized that the variance contained in the
resolution is project specific and will go on a case-by-case basis.
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER FAISON TO APPROVE THE
RESOLUTION; SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMßER BlJRBIDGE. The
motion passed as follows:
Burbidge
Dovey
Faison
Ferrell
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
VIII.
INTRODUCTION ORDINANCES
a. Council Bill #368/Cingular Franchise Agreement
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, GRANTING NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, A
DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, A NONEXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE
TO OCCUpy RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON,
WITHIN THE SPECIFIED FRANCHISE AREA FOR THE PURPOSES OF
INSTALLATION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF ITS WIRELESS
COMMUNICATIONS FIXTURES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT, CABLES,
ACCESSORIES AND IMPROVEMENTS IN A PORTION OF THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY
WITHIN AND THROUGH THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY.
City Clerk Green read the ordinance title into the record.
Federal Way City Council ReguÜlr Meeting Minute!.'
May 3,2005 -Page 5 (~f7
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER FAISON TO MOVE COUNCIL BILL
#368 TO SECOND READING AND ENACTMENT ON MAY 17;
SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FERRELL. The motion passed as
follows:
Burbidge
Dovey
Faison
Ferrell
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
b. Council Bill #369/Christian Faith Center Franchise
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, GRANTING CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER A NONEXCLUSIVE
FRANCHISE TO OCCUpy RIUHTS-OF~ WAY Of THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, WITHIN THE SPECIFIED FRANCHISE AREA TO CONSTRUCT,
MAINTAIN, REPAIR, OPERATE, AND REMOVE CABLE, VOrCE, DATA,
MECIIANICAL, SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM CONDUITS WITHIN AND
THROUGH CERTAIN RIGHTS-OF. WAY AND STREETS WITHIN THE CITY Of
FEDERAL WAY.
City Clerk Green read the ordinance title into the record.
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER FAISON TO MOVE COUNCIL BILL
#369 TO SECOND READING AND ENACTMENT ON MAY 17;
SECONDED BY COllNCILMEMßER PARK. The motion passed as
follows:
ßurbidge
Dovey
Faison
Ferrell
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
IX.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Ferrell: Last Thursday, a subcommittee of the Chamber/City Liaison
Committee met. Much progress has been made on the eŒorts to find out why businesses
are coming to and leaving Federal Way. On April 20'11 the Suburban Cities Association
public issues committee met; they discussed issues such as sales tax streamlining.
Couneilmember Park: The Ran Woo-Ri Festival is one week away; the Executive
Con~mittee, will I"?eet tomo.rro~ at 6:30~.m. in Council Chambers. The next Lodging Tax
AdvIsory COtTIll1lttee meetll1g IS May 6 at S:OOa.m.
Deputy Mayor Kochmar: She and Councilmember Burbidge attended a breakfast at
Christian Faith Center celebrating women in the community. She thanked city stail for
their efforts in putting together the Volunteer Recognition Dinner and the Certified
Emergency Response Team program. She recently attended a meeting of the Highline
Forum (formerly Airport Communities Coalition), and will give a report to Council shortly.
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
May 3, 2005 - Page 6 of 7
COlillcilmember Burbidge: The next Parks, Recreation, Human Services, and Public Safety
Committee meeting will take place Monday, May 9th at 5:30p.m. She congratulated the
Youth Commission on their efforts to put together Youth Recognition night. She recently
attended meetings of the Joint Resolution Committee; they discussed the restructuring of
the Community Development Block Grant process, which will eventually make its way in
1Ì'ont of full Council sometime in June.
Councilmember Dovey: The next Land Use/Transportation Committee meeting will take
place on Monday May 16th at 5:30p.m.
Counei I member Faison: Councilmember Faison reported on the budget passed by the state
legislature, and thanked Assistant City Manager Matheson and members of the legislature
representing Federal Way for the efforts in their successful efforts to get tlmds fÒr
transportation and other projects, including the "triangle" project. Federal Way also
received a permanent seat on the Puget Sound Regional Council board. The next Finance,
Economic Development, and Regional AfJairs Committee meeting wi1I take place on May
III
10 at 5:30p.m.
Mayor McColgan: Mayor McColgan spoke about the Volunteer Recognition Dinner and
commented on the large number of people who volunteer in our community, including the
Han Woo-Ri Festival. The Federal Way Sister City Baseball team will be holding a team
auction fundraiser on Saturday, May ih at 6:00p.m. at Saghalie Junior High.
X.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager Moscley reported that a bidders conference on the new community center
was held earJier today; four large construction firms were in attendance. There are reports
that other finns may be interested as well. King County Executive Ron Sims and King
County Councilmember Pete Von Reichbauer will be in attendance to dedicate the new
Park and Ride located at Redondo Heights tomorrow morning at 7:30a.m.
Thc Council went into executive session at 8: 13p.m; with an expected duration of
approximately 45 minutes.
Xl.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
a.
b.
Collective Bargaining/Pursuant to RCW 42.30. 140(4)(a)
Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(b)
Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i) - added item
c.
At 9:00p.m, Assistant City Manager Derek Matheson extended the session for another 20
minutes. The Council came out of executive session at 9: 16p.m.
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minute".
May 3, 200J - Page 7 (~f 7
XII.
ADJOURNMENT
There being nothing further to discuss, Mayor McColgan adjourned the regular meeting of
the Federal Way City Council at 9: 16p.m.
N. Christine Green, CMC
City Clerk
h Æu /7
MEETING DATE: 1/' ~ 2005
ITEM# --:srCb)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
VOUCHERS
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMP ACT:
ßJ CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$1,799,500.43
$1,799,500.43
$
---"""'""mm""""""__m__""'-"--"-"""'-".--"-""-------"..""""__..m_-
m""",m"m___"""'-"--""""'-"
""-"---""""""----"""""-"-----"""""--"mm""""m_-"m"
""---._--"-"",,_m___m__""'_"_""""""m____"""""'mm_..,"""'-m---""-""""'"
A TT ACHMENTS: VOUCHER LIST
mm__"""""-"_"""""m_m""""m"m"_""""---.""'"
m_"_"",,-..__,,"",,,-----___""-m_..m"
m""""",m..___.._"'"".. m""'""m__m.."""""----.-"-'"
_m.._______""'",m..___....-
SUMMARY /BACKGROUND:
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor per~ ed as des ribed herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the City of
Federal, Washingto d that I;mthorized to authenticate and certify said claims. -
, ",/
f '
mm__"""'-""..m"""""'---""""-'-"---"""""
""m_""""---"..m"",.,--.."""""---_"""",_m.._",,,,,,-
"_"m_"m""""'_"_"-""""-"-___"""m_m",,""""'.--m_'"
"""_"mm_m"""'",m_-"mm""'",.."m"_,,"""""'-"-_m_""-""""",-,-..-...-
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Approve attached vouchers pursuant to RCW 42.24
...."""""-_...._""",mm..""",,,,"_-"""""---"""""-"" ..._m_""",-_----"-""",_.._"""""_......"",,,,,m___"""""'_m_""",'""m- ""'..--....""""_m_..m""""__----""""""-""""""""..___m"""""_.._"""""'-"'....m....""""..mmm_""""".._m__,,"_"""-""""'_..m...__~"""..__m_"""""",__m""""""",mm..__.."""",..--..-.."""'""",----.
PROPOSED MOTION: I move approval of Vouchers.
-;;;:~-;;;;~~~- -- -~
"..m__""""""--"-"""-""""""---"-""""'""",m...._""""""",---"""""""".m____.._"""""m-
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 T ABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/10/2001
-,~
CITY OF ., ßJ
Federal Way
MEMORANDUM
Date:
April 20. 2005
To:
Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee
Via:
David Moseley, City Manager
From:
Tho Kraus, Finance Manager
Subject:
Vouchers
Action Requested:
Accept the vouchers and forward to the April 26, 2005 Council meeting for approval.
ApPROVAL OF COMMITTEE ACTION:
k:\fin\acctspay\checkrun\mfr cover.doc
II
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
03/31/2005 10:21 :11AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
184751 3/17/2005 008735 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICIHANWOO-RI 2/3/2005 501(C)3 APP HAN WOO-RI NV 500.00 500.00
Voucher: 184751
184760 3/23/2005 0072 3 8 PETTY CASH: JURY FEES FEB 05 3/22/2005 MSF-2/0S-REIM WITNESS/JUf 491.20 491.20
Voucher: 184760
184761 3/23/2005 000302 KING COUNTY RECORDS.ElE02-60061 3/22/2005 CD-O4-102540 CELEBRATION 175.00 175.00
Voucher: 184761
184762 3/23/2005 003488 KELL Y, STEPHEN PER DIEM 3/1S/2005 PS-3/24/05-3/25/05 ADV TRVL 68.00 68.00
Voucher: 184762
184763 3/23/2005 002024 PETTY CASH~WITNESS FEES FEB 05 3/22/2005 MSF-2/05 WITNESS FUND PE 736.02 736.02
Y'.o.u.c.h e r: 184763
184764 3/31/2005 000083 AARO INC DBA THE LOCK SH42688 2/25/2005 MSFL T-LOCKSMITH SVCS 26.26 26.26
\--) Voucher: 1 84764
184765 3/31/2005 000385 ACCOUNTEMPS 12985893 3/22/2005 MSF-TRUONG W/E 3/18 TEMf 1,320.00
VJ Voucher: 184765 12933231 3/14/2005 MSF-3/11/0S TEMP OFFICE HI 936.40
12985886 3/22/2005 MSF- TIBBLES W/E 03/18 TEf\¡ 749.12 3,005,52
184766 3/31/2005 000109 ACTIVE SECURiTY CONTROL 13660 318/2005 PKM-GRD MTN LOCKSMITH ~ 478.09
Voucher: 184766 13672 3/17/2005 PKM-GRD MTN LOCKSMITH ~ 357,30
13666 3/10/2005 SWM-MAINTENANCE SUPPLI 113.65
13673 3/17/2005 PKM-GRD MTN LOCKSMITH ~ 101.53
13662 3/9/200S PS-LOCKSMITH SVCS 27.27
13664 3/9/2005 PKM-GRD MTN lOCKSMITH ~ 25.38
13663 3/9/2005 PS-LOCKSMITH SVCS 13.87
13675 3/22/2005 PS-LOCKSMITH SVCS 13.25
13656 2J28/2005 PKM-GRD MTN LOCKSMITH ~ 8.33 1,138.67
184767 3/31!2005 007637 AKElA SECURITY SERVICE 1f\3515 3/1/2005 MC-(02/05) UNARMED SCRT ( 3,520.00 3,520.00
Voucher: 184767
184768 3!31/2005 008736 ALERT INTERNATIONAL RENEW TUCKE 3/15/2005 PS-MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 40,00 40.00
Voucher: 184768
184769 3/31/2005 001285 ALPINE PRODUCTS ~NC TM-68770 3/9/2005 PKM-HOUSEHOLO SUPPLIES 360,65
Voucher: 184769 TM-68655 3/2/2005 PWST-FACILITY CLEANING S 338.80 699.45
184770 3/31/2005 008161 AMARAL, MYRTLE AMARAL 3/14/2005 MS-2004 UTILITY TAX REBA T 54.79 54,79
Voucher: 184770
184771 3/3112005 005287 AMERICALL COMMUNICATIOtD6416 3/21/2005 SWM-AFTER HR CALL~OUT S 108.95
Voucher: 184771 06417 3/21/2005 PKM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT 51 64.50 173.45
Page: 1
apChkLst
03/31/2005 10:21 :11AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 2
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice loy Date DescriDtion Amount Paid Check Total
184772 3/31/2005 003645 AMERICAN JANITORIAL SVCS3825 3/8/2005 PKKFT.2105 SERVICE KNUTE; 540.00
Voucher: 184772 3826 3/8/2005 AG04-09: 2/05 PKM JNTRL SV 440.00 980.00
184773 3/31/2005 001522 AMERiCAN RED CROSS 10006774 318/2005 PRCS-FIRST AIDlCPR TRAINI 775.50
Voucher: 184773 10006657 3/1/2005 FIRST AID/CPR TRAINING- 380.00 1,155:50
184774 3/31/2005 001522 AMERICAN RED CROSS 10006732 3/4/2005 PKM-FIRST AID/CPR TRAININ 36,00 36.00
Voucher: 184774
184775 3/31/2005 000190 APA-AMERICAN PLANNING AW3060S-091464 3/2/2005 COP - APA RENEWAL/CLARK 342.00
Voucher: 184775 030605-091465 3/2/2005 COP - APA RENEWAL/FEWIN: 309.00
120405-067348 2/8/2005 CDA - APA RENEWAL - MCCL 308.00
030605-092187 3/2/2005 COP - APA RENEWALIFEWIN: 210.00 1,169.00
184776 3/31/2005 002534 ARBORSCANINC 5696 3/9/2005 PKMTITREE REMOVAL AND ¡. 1,082.56 1,082.S6
Voucher: 184776
184777 3/31/2005 005715 ARCH WIRELESS HOLDINGS IA6163838C 3/2/2005 MSTEL-03/05 PAGER LEASE 353.12 353.12
~' Voucher: 184777
-1. 184778 3/31/2005 007158 ARCHIVES NORTHWEST LLC 0040 2/28/2005 MC-(02/05) STORAGE FEE 313.33
Voucher: 184778 0048 2/28/2005 PS-(02/05) STORAGE FEE 254.05 567.38
184779 3/31/2005 005822 ARMOR HOLDINGS FORENSI(F05-048861 2/18/2005 PS-CRIME SCENE SUPPLIES- 73.30 73.30
Voucher: 184779
184780 3/31/2005 003057 ASSOC OF PERMIT TECHNICIWSAPT - O. LEE 3/23/2005 CDB-WSAOT 2005 CONVERE 180,00 180.00
Voucher: 184780
184781 3/31/2005 001233 AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE 0304290115001 7/16/2004 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE sve 71.54
Voucher: 184781 056580155200 3/16/2005 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE sve 26.94
0304290115001 3/16/2005 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SVC 3.80 102.28
184782 3/31/2005 000075 AT&T WIRELESS & CINGUlAF26837633 3/12/2005 MSTEL-(03/05) CELL AIR TIME 22.88 22.88
Voucher: 184782
184783 3/31/2005 000575 ATTORNEYS' INFORMATION [69145 2/28/2005 LAW-MNTHL Y SRV CRG: INV1 25.00 25.00
Voucher: 184783
184784 3/3112005 004128 BAGNELL INC 8646 3/15/2005 SWM-PRINTING SERVICES: ( 167.20 167.20
Voucher: 184784
184785 3/31/2005 007479 BARKER RINKER SEACAT 20309.02 3/3/2005 AG04-33:COM CTR DESIGN&¡ 67,577.34 67,577,34
Voucher: 184785
184786 3/31/2005 005237 BARKER. DEB TRVL REIMB 3/28/2005 CD-PER DIEM MEALS 3/20/03 856.40 856.40
Voucher: 184786
184787 3131/2005 000792 BARRY'S TRUCKING & LANDS394930 31712005 PKM-02/05-356TH PK L T, 3481 783.36 783.36
Voucher: 184787
Page: 2
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3
03/31/2005 10:21: 11AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
184788 3/31/2005 007875 BATTERIES PLUS 245-59299 3/21/2005 PS-BATTERIES OFFICE EQUI 304.64 304.64
Voucher: 184788
184789 3/31/2005 700349 BAYVIEW COUNTRY ESTATE:18424 3/22/2005 PKDBC-RENT AL DEPOSIT RE 150,00 150,00
Voucher: 184789
184790 3/31/2005 008762 BISON CREEK PIZZJ\ REFUND 3/22/2005 PRCS-REFUND SPONSOR P~ 700.00 700.00
Voucher: 184790
184791 3/31/2005 006023 BLADE-TECH INDUSTRIES IN{FJOOO1333 3/2/2005 PS-TASER HOLSTER-TEK LO 434.66 434,66
Voucher: 184791
184792 3/31/2005 008041 BLI N D CLEANERS NORTHWE7135 1/3/2005 CH-METAL MINI BLINDS 407,12 407.12
Voucher: 184792
184793 3/31/2005 001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO 11410990 3/11/2005 PS-UNIFORM OR BOOTS- EM 1,501.44
Voucher: 184793 393246 3/11/2005 PS-UNIFORM OR BOOTS- SE 533.12
417013 2/24/2005 PS-UNIFORM SERVICE 416.43
412008 2/24/2005 PS-UNIFORM SERVICE 369.70
422871 3/15/2005 PS-UNIFORM OR BOOTS-WIL 324.10
H 418995 3/4/2005 PS-UNIFORM OR BOOTS- MA 287.12
420928 3/2/2005 PS-UNtFORM SERVICE 231.58
\.1\ 419639 2/23/2005 PS-UNIFORM SERVICE 173.86
415437 3/2/2005 PS-UNIFORM SERVICE 144.65
416055-01 2/24/2005 PS-UNIFORM SERVICE 55.38
421104 3116/2005 PS-UNIFORM OR BOOTS-NO I 43.51
421495 3/4/2005 PS-UNIFORM SERVICE 43.47
420962 3/2/2005 PS-UNJFORM SERVICE 41.33
421503 3/11/2005 PS-UNIFORM OR BOOTS- DR 34.76
420195 2/25/2005 PS-UNIFORM OR BOOTS- PIE 17.41 4,217.86
184794 3/31/2005 004919 BRA TWEAR 303674 3/9/2005 PS-UNIFORM ACCESSORIES 406.91 406.91
Voucher: 184794
184795 3/3112005 008487 BROWN, ARTHUR W R020495 3/10/2005 PWAD-EOC COMMUNICATIO! 101.02 101.02
Voucher: 184795
184796 3/31/2005 005801 BUD CLARY CHEVROLET, OLl3440 3/22/2005 MSFT- CHEVROLET TRUCK \ 29,159.22 29,159.22
Voucher: 184796
184797 3131/2005 003839 BUSINESS TELECOM PRODUIO10830 3/24/2005 MSITEL- PACKAGE OF 10 EA 50.95 50.95
Voucher: 184797
Page: 3
apChkLst
03/31/2005 10:21 :11AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 4
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date DescriDtion
184798 3/31/2005 000414 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC9882 3/16/2005 PKDBC-(03/14-03/15) CATER!!
Voucher: 184798 9885 3/16/2005 PKKFT-(03/12/05) CATERING
9883 3/16/2005 PKDBC-(03/11) CATERING SV
9884 3/16/2005 PKDBC-(03/11-03/13) CATERII
CALHOUN 03/m 3/22/2005 PS-K CALHOUN REIMB CLOT
Amount Paid
685.80
69.70
49.80
28.48
85.46
184799 3/31/2005 005825 CALHOUN, KARL
Voucher: 184799
184800 3/31/2005 008748 CARROLL, STACEY
Voucher: 184800
184801 3/31/2005 000991 CASCADE COFFEE INC
L\ Voucher: 184801
\ J 184802 3/31/2005 003093 CASCAD E COM P UTER MA!NT 9098211
~ Voucher: 184802
184803 3/31/2005 002351 CASCADE MOBILE MIX CONC18912
Voucher: 184803
184804 3/31/2005 005657 CHO I C EPO I NT B US I NESS AN [ABOOO 1146187
Voucher: 184804
184805 3131/2005 004044 CITY OF AUBURN
Voucher: 184805
184806 3/31/2005 004838 CITY OF ENUMCLAW
Voucher: 184806
184807 3/31/2005 007697 COAKLEY, RUTH
Voucher: 184807
184808 3/31/2005 003752 COASTWIDE SUPPLY DBA
Voucher: 184808
200634
20414106
05-013667
4867
COAKLEY
T1482448
T1480499
T1480499~ 1.
184809 3/31/2005 001969 COD E P U BU S H I N G COM P AN~23829
Voucher: 184809 23859
23843
184810 3/31/2005 007591 COMMERCIAL SPACE ONUNE66375
Voucher: 184810
184811 3/31/2005 004395 CO NSOLJ DATED E LECTR I CAL 0220-444612
Voucher 184811
3/11/2005 PRCS-REFUND "WORK RELA 39.00
3/21/2005 MSM&D-MTG COFFEE SUPPl 147.57
3/9/2005 MSDP-(03/05)-PRINTER MAIN 750.72
3/8/2005 SWM-3/8 CONCRETE HOYT 8 231.20
2/28/2005 PS-(02/05) AUTO TRACKXP S' 140.00
2/15/2005 PS-01/05 PRISONER LODGINI 1,948.32
3/8/2005 PS- 02/05 PRISONER LODGlt 250.00
3/22/2005 MS-2004 UTILITY TAX REBAT 65.01
3/21/2005 PKCP-HOUSEHOLD SUPPUE 387.92
3/15/2005 PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~ 179.89
3/16/2005 PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~ 44.60
3/2/2005 MSC-CODIFICA TION SVCS 4,708.32
3/8/2005 MSC-CODIFICATION SVCS 689.52
3/4/2005 MSC-CODIFICATION SVCS 28.29
3/1/2005 CM-3/05-PROPERTY DATABA 100.00
3/4/2005 PKCHB-UGHTING SUPPLIES 384.17
Check Total
833.78
85.46
39.00
147.57
750.72
231.20
140.00
1,948.32
250.00
65.01
612.41
5,426.13
100.00
384.17
Page: 4
apChkLst Final Check list Page: 5
03f31/2005 10:21 :11 AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid Check Total
184812 3/31/2005 008445 COPIERS NORTHWEST INC 19999 3/7/2005 MIS:PRINTER & FAX TONER I 150.58
Voucher: 184812 20068 3/9/2005 MIS:PR!NTER & FAX TONER I 101.95
20068 3/10/2005 MSDP - PRINTER & FAX TONI 101.95
20218 3/16/2005 M!S:PRINTER & FAX TONER ( 91,39
20217 3/16/2005 MIS:PRINTER & FAX TONER ( 76.46 522.33
184813 3/31/2005 000721 CORLISS RESOURCES INC 48139 3/10/2005 SWM-ECOLOGY BLOCKS 98.49 98.49
Voucher: 184813
184814 3/31/2005 008016 CUMMINGS, SONYA CUMMINGS 3/14/2005 MS-2004 UTILITY TAX REBAT 77.56 77.56
Voucher: 184814
184815 3/31/2005 000854 0 J TROPHY 00215461 #3 2/9/2005 CDHS PLAQUE FOR HSC 58.76
Voucher: 184815 00215764 3/22/2005 PRCS-NAME BADGES 47.60 106,36
184816 3/31/2005 006029 DARBO MANUFACTURING CC010937 12/7/2004 PKCS-RED,WHITE, BLUE OU' 72,60 72,60
Voucher: 184816
H 184817 3/31/2005 008750 DASH SERVICES 02-57977 3/15/2005 PW-ROW PERMIT CASH BON 2,079.00 2,079.00
Voucher: 184817
~ 184818 3/31/2005 008757 DEFENDERS ASSOCIATION JURY REIMB 3/21/2005 MC-3121/05 JURY REI M 8 23.24 23.24
Voucher: 184818
184819 3/31/2005 000438 DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE JC3990 3124/2005 PKRCS-FOOD SERVICES- 219,04 219,04
Voucher: 184819
184820 3/31/2005 008477 DESTINATION ASC 868 3/15/2005 PS-ANTENNA - PARTS & REP 21.75 21.75
Voucher: 184820
184821 3131/2005 005922 DEX MEDIA WEST 025069774000 3/18/2005 PKDBC & KFT -( 03/05) DIRE CTC 59.90 59.90
Voucher: 184821
184822 3/31/2005 007596 DIAZ, PATRICIA REFUND 3/14/2005 PRCS-CLASS MIN NOT MET F 8.00 8.00
Voucher: 184822
184823 3/31/2005 008501 DIGITAL PRINT SERVICES 33747 3/10/2005 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES C< 468,05
Voucher: 184823 33307 1/13/2005 MSC-PR I NT! NG S ERVI C E S- 307.12 775,17
184824 3/31/2005 005619 DMCMA MC-2005 REGIS 3/4/2005 MC-(OS) DMCMA DUES-SEE C 350.00 350.00
Voucher: 184824
184825 3/31/2005 008039 DMX MUSIC A 124098 3/1/2005 MfS-(03/05) DSS STANDARD 79,38 79.38
Voucher: 184825
Page: 5
apChkLst
0313112005 10:21 :11AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 6
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice
184826 3131/2005 005341 DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA DODD 3/15/05
Voucher: 184826 DODD 3/18/05
DODD 3/21/05
DODD 3/22/05
DODD 3/14/05
37084
184827 3/31/2005 007277 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC
Voucher: 184827
184828 3/31/2005 008741 DOUG LAS CO U NTY
Voucher: 184828
184829 3/31/2005 000939 OS WATERS OF AMERICA, LP1716951--15
Voucher: 184829 1649768-15
l\ 184830 3/31/2005 008753 DWYER, NATHAN I EL 03-4917 5
,~ Voucher 184830
Cù 184831 3/31/2005 005399 DYNA SYSTEMS
Voucher 184831
006
10789087
Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid
3/15/2005 M C-3/05 INTER PRETE R S E R\ 80,00
3/18/2005 M C-3/05 INTER PRETE R S E R\ 80,00
3/21/2005 MC-3/05 INTERPRETER SER\ 80,00
3/22/2005 MC-3/05 INTERPRETER SER\ 80-00
3/14/2005 MC-3/05 INTERPRETER SER\ 80.00
2/25/2005 PS-EQUIPMENT- 299.00
3/9/2005 PS-POLICE SNIPER TRAIN¡NC 2,400.00
3/3/2005 KJP-WTR CLR RNTL 35.26
2/25/2005 PKM-WTR/CLR RNTL ACCT#L 12-86
3/11/2005 PS-TRAFFIC SCHOOL REFUf\ 90.00
2/24/2005 PKM/ST/SWM-SHOP SUPPLIE 296.56
Check Total
400.00
299.00
2,400,00
48,12
90,00
296.56
Page: 6
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7
03/31/2005 10:21 :11 AM CITY OF.FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Descriotion Amount Paid Check Total
184832 3/31/2005 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE 11040122 3/14/2005 MSFL T-REPAIR/MNT 580.27
Voucher: 184832 1040022 3/10/2005 PS-VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 447.68
1040089 3/12/2005 M S FL T -REP AI RIM NT 260.58
1040012 3/912005 MSFLT-EAGLE TIRE & AUTO I 258.48
1040204 3/18/2005 MSFL T-REPAIR/MNT 223.59
1040224 3/19/2005 MSFL T-EAGLE TIRE & AUTO I 142.25
1040114 3/14/2005 PS-REPAIR SVCS/MNT 140.59
1039995 3/8/2005 PS-REPAIR SVCS/MNT 128.71
1039979 3/8/2005 PS-VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 101.19
1040246 3/21/2005 PS-REPAIR SVCS/MNT- 91.00
1040221 3/19/2005 MSFL T-REPAIRlMNT 74.08
1040085 3/12/2005 MSFL T-EAGLE TIRE & AUTO I 48.94
1040073 3/12/2005 MSFL T-EAGLE TIRE & AUTO ¡ 27.30
~ 1040076 3/1212005 MSFLT-EAGLE TIRE & AUTO ¡ 27.30
1040082 3/12/2005 MSFLT-EAGLE TIRE & AUTO L 27.30
1040212 3/19/2005 MSFLT-EAGLE TIRE & AUTO I 27.30
1040019 3/10/2005 PS-VEHICLE MA!NTENANCE 20.12
1040063 3/11/2005 PS-VEHICLE MA!NTENANCE 20.12
1040020 3/10/2005 PS-VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 13.32
1040021 3/10/2005 PS-VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 13.32
1040138 3/15/2005 PS-REPAIR SVCS/MNT 13.32 2,686.76
184833 3/31/2005 008517 ECOCHICA DESIGN 89 3/11/2005 PWSWR-PRINT!NG SERVICE: 201.93 201.93
Voucher: 184833
184834 3/31/2005 004444 ECOUGHTS NORTHWEST 22357 3/16/2005 CHB/4FT FLUORESCENT BUl 487.52 487.52
Voucher: 184834
184835 3/31/2005 007283 EMERALD AIRE INC 48261 2/17/2005 PKCHB/REPAIR HEATING EU 920.12
Voucher: 184835 48557 3/14/2005 CHB/REPAIRCOOL!NG UNIT. 290.50 1,210.62
184836 3131/2005 006514 ENGINEERING BUSINESS SY~20839 3/8/2005 MSMD-20# BOND 24"X500' FC 304.64 304.64
Voucher: 184836
184837 3/31/2005 000328 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) 0187457 3/15/2005 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 3/1/1 7,402.64
Voucher: 184837 0187456 3/15/2005 MSFL T-FUEL FOR VEHICLES. 3,155.79 10,558.43
184838 3/31/2005 006412 ESP PRINTING 110957 3/9/2005 PWSWR-PRINTING SERVICE: 1,132.61 1,132.61
Voucher: 184838
184839 3/31/2005 004840 EV AC-EMERGENCY VEH ICLE 104147 3/10/2005 PS-SL!DE OUT ELECTRONIC: 262.53
Voucher: 184839 104128 2/28/2005 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES 115.45 377.98
Page: 7
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8
0313112005 10:21 :11AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Jnv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid Check Total
184840 3/31/2005 001131 EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTRIC8966 3/8/2005 MSFl T-REPAIR/MAINT sves- 270.08
Voucher: 184840 5370 6/20/2003 MSFl T-REPAIR/MAINT sves- 183.87
8977 3/10/2005 MSFl T -REPAIR/MAINT SVCS- 177.52
9010 3/17/2005 MSF l T -R E PAl R/MA I NT SVCS- 86.49 717.96
184841 3/31/2005 008749 EVERGREEN LANDSCAPING 102-58009 3/16/2005 PW-ROW PERMIT CASH BON 1,260.00 1,260.00
Voucher: 184841
184842 3/31/2005 001748 EVERSON'S ECONO-VAC INC 033999 2/28/2005 AG03-75B-VACUUM/JET ROD 3,100.91
Voucher: 184842 034000 2/28/2005 PKM-CLEAN OUT CATCH 8M 2.024.78 5,125.69
184843 3/31/2005 008647 FASTENAl WAFED100121 3/1/2005 SWM-OTHER OPERATING SL 41.39 41.39
Voucher: 184843
184844 3/31/2005 000217 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPOR5-402-09160 3/4/2005 DOCUMENTS EXPRESS DELI 27,26
t-\ Voucher: 184844 5-426-67685 3/21/2005 PWDS-EXPRESS DELIVERY 5.73 32.99
184845 3/31/2005 000229 FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER CO1816 2/1/2005 CM-TOURISM CONTRACT - F 250.00
- Voucher: 184845 1842 3/1/2005 OM-TOURISM CONTRACT - F 250.00 500.00
CJ 184846 3/31/2005 004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR 006033 1/29/2005 PWTR-(O1/29/05) NEWSPAPE 327.15
Voucher: 184846 006106 3/9/2005 P KAD M-( 03/09/05) NEWS PAP I 174.48
006108 319/2005 eDPl-(03/09/05 LEGAlS- 106.24
006101 3/5/2005 CDPl-(03/05/05) lEGAlS- 92.96
006107 3/9/2005 CDPL-(03/09/05) lEGALS- 86.32
006112 3/12/2005 CDHS-(03/12/05) lEGAL NOTI 79.68
006102 3/5/2005 CDPl-3/5/05 LEGAlS- 53.12
006116 3/16/2005 MIS- 03/16/05 NEWSPAPER A 53.12 973.07
184847 3/31/2005 002332 FEDERAL WAY PRINTING 3887 3/9/2005 PKM-DAY CAMP 2005 BROer 1,120.64 1,120.64
Voucher: 184847
184848 3/31/2005 001183 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOAR04037 3/16/2005 PKM-1/2 SEWERfWATER AT ~ 14.48 14.48
Voucher: 184848
184849 3/31/2005 001893 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTARO4009 3/8/2005 PS-EXPLORER SCOUT TRAIt- 486.00 486.00
Voucher: 184849
184850 3/31/2005 001 055 FEDERAL WAY SYMPHONY TOURISM GRAt 3/15/2005 LTAe-2005 TOURISM ENHANI 3,500.00 3,500.00
Voucher: 184850
184851 3/31/2005 001593 FEDERAL WAY TOWING INC 24876 3/3/2005 PS-TOWING #522 & 523 136.00
Voucher: 184851 24286 3/1112005 PS-TOWING SERVICES CASE 136.00
24746 2/21/2005 PS-TOWING SERVICES 102.00
04-1562 1/4/2005 CD-LASER PRINT COLOR-CO 100.64
04-1247 CR 1/9/2004 CD-LASER PRINT COLOR-CO -9.00
374.00
184852 3/31/2005 004910 F I LETEX LLC
Vouche~ 184852
91.64
Page: 8
. apChkLst
03/31/2005 10:21: 11AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 9
Bank: key us bank
184853 3/31/2005 003729 FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTA20223620 2/28/2005
Voucher: 184853 20223420 2/25/2005
184854 3/31/2005 001686 FIRST CHOICE BUSINESS MA05046906436 3/5/2005
Voucher: 184854 00020715 2/28/2005
1848553/31/2005 007542 FL YGARE & ASSOCIATES INC64073 3/16/2005
Voucher: 184855 64075 3/16/2005
184859 3/31/2005 006028 FREEBORN LAW OFFICES PS3/21-3/23 FREEl 3/23/2005
V 0 u ch er: 184856 3/15/05 FR E E BC 3/22/2005
184857 3/31/2005 007404 FULLER, MICHELLE M FULLER 3/15/05 3/15/2005
Voucher: 184857
184858 3/31/2005 008755 FUSION
Voucher: 184858
L t, ' 184859 3/31/2005 000964 GASB-GOVT ACCTNG STANDGASB BOUND E 3/16/2005,
\ J Voucher: 184859 638230019 3/16/2005
- 184860 3/31/2005 001478 GEOLINE POSITIONING SYST178392 3/8/2005
- Voucher: 184860
184861 3/3112005 008751 GRIFFIN, GARY L.
Voucher: 184861
184862 3/31/2005 000671 H D FOWLER COMPANY
Voucher: 184862
Check #
Date
184863 3/31/2005
Voucher:
184864 3/31/2005
Voucher:
184865 3/31/2005
Voucher:
184866 3/31/2005
Voucher:
184867 3/3112005
Voucher:
184868 3/3112005
Voucher:
003534 HALL, PAM
184863
008758 HANSON, GARFIELD
184864
001487 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPAI37681551
184865
000016 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 1667630A
184866
000016 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
184867
005231 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
184868
(Continued)
Vendor
Invoice
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
1,585.22
140.35
117.50
17.20
1,238.50
578.00
200.00
125.00
60.00
300.00
175.00
155.00
67.82
700.00
486.42
291.77
3.82
-79.51
29.39
74.09
6,081.92
1,408.96
1,062.1.9
169.40
1,720,23
Check Total
1,725.57
134.70
1,816,50
325.00
60.00
300.00
330.00
67,82
700.00
702,50
29.39
74,09
6,081.92
1,408.96
1,231.59
1,720.23
MSDP-METROSCAN ANNUAL
MSDP-METROSCAN MEDIA F
MSMD-COPIER RPR,MNT,SUI
MSMD-COPIER RPR,MNT,SUI
LAW; HARREUS ARBITRATIO
LAW; HARREUS ARBITRATIO
MC-PROTEM 3/21/05 & 3/23/0!
MC-3/11-3/17/05 PRO TEM
MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE~
18427
3/22/2005 PKDBC-RENTAL DEPOSIT RE
2004-2005 ANNUAL BOUND E
MS-SUBSCRIPTION RENEWA
PS-UPGRADE KIT AND REPAI
02-55283
3/15/2005 PW-ROW PERMIT CASH BON
J1625202 3/11/2005 PKM-BRASS BUSHING FOR
11629085 3/18/2005 PKM-IRRJGATION SUPPLIES
11625236 3111/2005 PKM-BRASS BUSHING FOR
C 117351 3/11/2005 PKM-GD REPAIRlMAJNT SUPI
EMPLOYEE REI 3/3/2005 PS-CDR'S FOR RECORDS & F
HANSON
3/23/2005 MS-2004 UTILITY TAX REBAT
3/9/2005 MSDP/RR - PHASE I PRINTER
2/25/2005 MSDP-RR-CANON LC710 FÄX
3/7/2005 MSMD-2/05 COPIES MAl NT
3/7/2005 MSDP (3/05-4/05) FAX MACHI!
2/25/2005 MSMD-COPIER RENTAL
16434222
16434223
64793412
Page: 9
apChkLst
03/31/2005 10:21:11AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 10
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice
184869 3131/2005 003211 I RON MO U NT AI N/SAFES ITE 1M W227 47
Voucher: 184869
184870 3/31/2005 005025 J&R COMMERCIAL INC
Voucher: 184870
184871 3/31/2005 001815 JAMAR TEC H NOL OG I ES I NC 69220
Voucher: 184871
184872 3/31/2005 000718 JENNINGS EQUIPMENT INC 000000
Voucher: 184872
184873 3/31/2005 000799 JET CHEVROLET
Vouche~ 184873
184874 3/31/2005 005656 JIM'S DETAIL SHOP 11692F
Vouche~ 184874 11688F
~\. 11690F
\ì 11664F
;J 184875 3/31/2005 005934 K P TRANSLATION SERVICES03/01/05
\ Voucher: 184875 03/08/05
03/09/05
02/22/05
02/24/05
03/02/05
184876 3/31/2005 002679 KANG, SA! C 03/15/05 KANG
Voucher: 184876 3/14/05 KANG
184877 3/3112005 003309 KCDA PURCHASING COOPER65931701
Voucher: 184877 659291 01
65931702
65929201
65929202
184878 3/3112005 000125 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVI~1345660
Voucher: 184878 1344167
1343289
1343291
1345661
1343290
184879 3/31/2005 005568 KING COUNTY FLEET ADM 01'202738
Voucher: 184879 202740
2368
CTCS83469
Inv Date Descriotion
2/28/2005 MSC- 02/05 RECORDS STOR!
3123/2005 NEW CH-3/05 -JANITORIAL SI
3115/2005 M S F LT. RAC-200 W NE H I C LE
3/8/2005
PKM-BEL TIKNOB/BOL T
Amount Paid
981 .17
4,904.76
712.00
43.13
158.27
70.72
65.00
65.00
43.51
206.50
161.50
161.50
116.50
116.50
116.50
87.50
52.50
355.00
289.09
136.87
83.55
72.99
23,311.38
12,726.92
4.826.28
2,627.92
2,123.52
876.73
3,163.55
1,900.30
Check Total
981. 17
4,904.76
712.00
43.13
158.27
244.23
879.00
140.00
937.50
46,492.75
5,063.85
3/7/2005
MSFL T-REPAIR SERVICES-
3/1812005 PS-DETA1L SVCS #531
3/9/2005 PS-DETAIL SVCS # 659
3/17/2005 PS-DETAIL SVCS #6251
12121/2004 PS-DETAIL SVCS #902
3/1/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE
3/8/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE
3/9/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE
2/22/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE
2/24/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE
3/2/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE
3/15/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE
3/14/2005 MC-!NTREPRETER SERVICE
3/4/2005 PWSWR-RECYCLING MATER
3/4/2005 PWSWR-RECYCLING MATER
3/1812005 PWSWR-RECYCLING MATER
3/4/2005 VRCC CABINETS FOR REC C
3/18/2005 VRCC CABINETS FOR REC C
3/16/2005 PWTR-(02/05)BSC SIGN/MRKI
2/22/2005 PS-[01/05} KING CO JAIL
2/16/2005 PWTR-(O1/05)BSC StGN/MRKI
2/16/2005 PWTR-(O1/05)BSC SIGN/MRKI
3/16/2005 PWTR-(O2/05)BSC SIGN/MRKi
3/25/2005 PWTR-(01/05)BSC SIGN/MRKI
3/4/2005 PKM - BO LLAR DS/S ¡ GNS-
3/4/2005 ' SWM-R E PAl R/MAI NTENANC E
Page: 10
. apChkLst
03/31/2005 10:21 :11AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 11
Bank: key us bank
Check #
Date
(Continued)
Vendor
Invoice
184880 3/31/2005 008328 KING COUNTY MENTAL HEAL7530017
Voucher: 184880
184881 3/3112005 000564 KING COUNTY PET LICENSE PET-012005
Voucher: 184881 PET-022005
184882 3/31/2005 000201 KINKO'S INC, ACCOUNT #O20~515100074982
Voucher 184882 515100074910
515100074732
05-100585
184883 3/31/2005
Voucher:
184884 3/31/2005
Voucher:
184885 3131/2005
Voucher:
L \ 184886 3/31/2005
\, Voucher:
- 184887 3/31/2005
~ Voucher:
008746 KIRK, VAN
184883
005064 KOCHMAR, LINDA
184884
004298 KOSOFF-ROACH, MELANIE E WINTER 04/05
184885
001456 KUSTOM S!GNALS !NC
184886
003399 KVASNYUK, NIKOLAY
184887
3/7/2005
Inv Date Descripti.on
CDHS KG LlQUOREXCISE TP
3/21/2005
3/22/2005
3/21/2005
3/1 0/2005
2/14/2005
3/17/2005
MSF-(01/05) KC PET FEES RE
MSF-(02/05) KC PET FEES RE
PS-PRINTING SERVICES
PKM-PRINTING SERVICES
PS-PRINTING SERVICES
COB-REFUND CASH BOND A!
3/09/05 REIMBU 3/16/2005 CC-M!LEAGE REIMB TO SEAl
225240
3/1/2005
2/25/2005 PS-BATTERIES FOR TALON F
AG#02-54 (A) RECREATION G
03/09/05 KVASN 3/9/2005
311/05 KVASNYL 3/9/2005
MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE
MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE
Amount Paid
4,792.79
564.00
350.00
269.82
167.82
81.60
500.00
160.56
1,186.50
67.41
140.00
90,00
Check Total
4,792.79
914.00
519.24
500.00
160.56
1 ,186,50
67.41
230.00
Page: 11
apChkLst
03/3112005 10:21 :11AM
Bank: key us bank
(Contínued)
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Check # Date Vendor Invoice
184888 3/31/2005 000096 lAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRIC3050801
Voucher: 184888 29131 03
1768602
2926402
3075401
3075201
2926501
3075301
1639103
2922203
2957001
3266301
2798301
2830801
101103
3238401
3336201
2573402
3336301
2961401
2961501
2922503
3042401
2781401
3059601
0017026
N
-
-.£.
184889 3/31/2005 001939 LANDAU ASSOCIATES rNC
Voucher: 184889
184890 3/31/2005 007545 LANE POWELL PC
Voucher: 184890
184891 3/31/2005 008722 L ELAN D' CONS U L TI NG GRO U IJ 2937-1
Voucher: 184891
184892 3/31/2005 000630 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC
Voucher: 184892
3317623
80431
80265
80044
79942
Inv Date DescriDtion
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
319/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/1412005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/1412005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/2212005
3/14/2005
3/22/2005
3/22/2005
3/2212005
3/14/2005
3/8/2005
P KCP-( 12104-02/05) W ATE R/S
CHB-(12/07/04-02/03/05) WTR,
P KO BC-( 12/04-02/05) S EWE R
PKM-FAC (12/04-02/05) WATE
P KC P -( 12/04-02/05) W ATE R/S
P KC P -( 12/04-02/0 5) W ATE RIS
P KM-F AC (12/04-02/05) W A TE
PKCP-(12/04-02/05) WATERIS
CH B-( 12/04-02/05) WT R/SWR
CHa-( 12/07/04-02/03/05) WTR.
PKCP-( 12/04-02/05) WA TER/S
PKM-FAC (12/04-02/05) WATE
PKM-FAC (12/04-02/05) WATE
PKM-FAC (12/04-02/05) WATE
PKM-FAC (12/04-02/05) WATE
PWST-(12/04-02/05) WATER ~
PWS-(12104-02/05) WATER S\
PWS-(12/04-02/05) WATER S\
PWS-(12/04-02/05) WATER S\
PWS-(12/04-02/05) WATER S\
PWS-(12/04-2/05) WATER SV(
C H B-( 12/04-02/05) WTR/SWR
PWS-(12/04-02/15) WATER S\
PKM-FAC 12/04-2/05 WATER/:
PKM- (12/04-02/05) WTRISWR
CHB/ENGINEERING REVIEW
AG03-142A:2/05 PSA CNTRTf\
3/15/2005 CM- 2/1/05-3/15/05 AG#05-12 (
3/15/2005 PKM-STO N E/G RAVEL SUP PL i
3/10/2005 SWM-WASTE MATERIAL OISI
3/4/2005 SWM-WASTE MATERIAL OISI
3/1/2005 MSCH-BARK
Amount Paid
713.36
505.17
346.34
110.16
106.48
102.60
98.28
98.28
69.99
19.78
14.48
14.48
14.48 .
14.48
14.48
14.48
14.48
14.48
14.48
14.48
14.48
14.48
14.48
14.48
14.48
1,128.43
275.00
5,200.00
204.82
69.36
55.32
32.53
Page: 12
Check Total
2,387.64
1,128.43
275.00
5,200.00
362.03
Page: 12
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 13
03131/2005 10:21 :11 AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Descrlction Amount Paid Check Total
184893 3/31/2005 005339 LOWE'S HIW INC 88453 1/25/2005 LOWE'S SUPPLIES 188.99
Voucher: 184893 13804 3/1/2005 LOWE'S SUPPLIES 129.47
13727 3/17/2005 LOWE'S SUPPLIES 109.59
13801 3/1/2005 LOWE'S SUPPLIES 78.77
16649 3/9/2005 LOWE'S SUPPLIES 62.45
13520 3/15/2005 LOWE'S SUPPLIES 43.75
13703 2/28/2005 LOWE'S SUPPLIES 37.41
13407 2/25/2005 LOWE'S SUPPLIES 32.60
63646 1/20/2005 LOWE'S SUPPLIES 30.92
13556 3/7/2005 LOWE'S SUPPLIES 25.25
13741 3/9/2005 LOWE'S SUPPLIES 19.93
13880 311/2005 LOWE'S SUPPLIES 18.49
63157 3/21/2005 PKM-GROUND MT MAINT SUI 16.28
N 13666 3/16/2005 LOWE'S SUPPLIES 16.21
13286 2124/2005 LOWE'S SUPPLIES 13.89
- 09369 2/10/2005 LOWE'S SUPPLIES 5.40
'f\
13984 3/3/2005 LOWE'S SUPPLIES 3.24 . 832.64
184894 3/31/2005 001500 MACLEOD RECKORD ARCHIT3693 3/2/2005 AG04-35:2/05 SACAJAWEA Pi 591.87
Voucher: 184894 3692 3/2/2005 AG04-36:2/05 LAKOTA PARKS 554.35 1,146.22
184895 3/31/2005 008747 MAGEL, BEV REFUND 3/11/2005 PRCS-CLASS CANCEL REFUI 25.00 25,00
Voucher: 184895
184896 3/31/2005 001004 MAILMEDIA DBA IMMEDJA 49910 3/7/2005 PKM-ART COMMIS!ON NEWS 306.18 306.18
Voucher: 184896
184897 3/31/2005 008670 MASUNE CO 40124467 2/24/2005 PRCS/KJP FIRST AID AND BIC 119.22 119.22
Voucher: 184897
184898 3/31/2005 005406 MAYBERRY, MITCHEL 2005 INSTRUCl 3/18/2005 PKM-INSTRUCTOR PAYROLL 2,675.20 2,675.20
Voucher: 184898
184899 3/31/2005 004182 MCDONOUGH & SONS INC 138825 2/15/2005 AG05-02: 02/05 STREET SWE 3,296.96
Voucher: 184899 138974 2/28/2005 AG05-02: 02/05 STREET SWE 73,98 3,370.94
184900 3/31/2005 005176 MERINO STRAWE, BETTY 03/08/05 3/812005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE 135,00
Voucher: 184900 03/15/05 3115/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE 112.50
03/22/05 3122/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE 78.75 326.25
184901 3/31/2005 008029 MONTES DE OCA RICKS, MAF03/09/05 3/24/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE 168.75
Voucher: 184901 03/08/05 3/8/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE 123.75 292.50
Page: 13
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 14
0313112005 10:21 :11 AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid Check Total
184902 3/31/2005 001843 MORRIS PIHA REAL ESTATE ~APRIL 05 3121/2005 AG98-212 B :4/05 P S B L DG L EJ 3,759,00
Voucher: 184902 APRIL 05 3/21/2005 AG93-51 :4/05 KLCC PKNG La 525,71
020512 3122/2005 SWM-FW SELF STORAGE EA 75,00 4,359,71
184903 3/31/2005 001052 NAPA AUTO PARTS 806090 3/4/2005 PKM-FLEET REPAIR & MAl NT 104,32 104,32
Voucher: 184903
184904 3/31/2005 004426 NAS R O-NA TIONAL ASSOCIA T 12558 M I 3/5/2005 PS-2005 MEMBERSHIP-GREE 30,00 30.00
Voucher: 184904
184905 3/31/2005 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE 182834 3/18/2005 PKM-HARDWARD SUPPLIES 139.64
Voucher: 184905 182454 3/9/2005 PKM-HARDWARD SUPPLIES 87.02
182731 3/16/2005 PKM-HARDWARD SUPPLIES 64.50
182460 3/1012005 PKM-HARDWARD SUPPLIES 53.53
182401 3/8/2005 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 38.16
t:\ 182490 3/1 0/2005 P KM-HAR DW AR D SUP P LIES 37.18
182474 3/1 0/2005 PWS-MAI NT TOO L/S UP PLIES 31.18
~ 182396 3/8/2005 PKM-HARDWARD SUPPLIES 30.90
182209 3/3/2005 PKM-HARDWARD SUPPLIES 28.86
182665 3/1512005 PKM-HARDWARD SUPPLIES 22.76
182511 3/11/2005 PWS-MAINT TOOL/SUPPLIES 18.57
182940 3/22/2005 PKM-FACILITIES REPAIR SUF 15.75
182225 3/4/2005 PKM-CIP REPAIR SUPPLIES 13.22
182682 3/16/2005 PKM-HARDWARD SUPPLIES 13.21
182532 3/11/2005 PKM-HARDWARD SUPPLIES 12.02
182638 3/15/2005 PWS-MAI NT TOOL/S U P PLIES 11. 73
182525 3/11/2005 PKM-HARDWARD SUPPLIES 11,60
182889 3/21/2005 PKM-FACILITIES REPAIR SUF 10.25
182423 3/9/2005 PKM-HARDWARD SUPPLIES 8,49
182520 3/11/2005 SWM-REPA!R/MAINTENANCE 6,84
181890 2/23/2005 PWS-MAI NT TOO L/S UP PLIES 4,49
182534 3/11/2005 PKM-HARDWARD SUPPLIES 4,30
182378 3/8/2005 PKM-HARDWARD SUPPLIES 3,81
182773 3/17/2005 PKM-HARDWARD SUPPLIES 0.87
182494 3/10/2005 PKM-HARDWARD SUPPLIES -19.56 649.32
184906 3/31/2005 000392 NORDBY, MARTIN GM530 1/4/2005 CD-GM530 EMPLOYEE TUITI( 528.00 528.00
Voucher: 184906
Page: 14
. apChkLst
03/31/2005 10:21 :11AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 15
Bank: kev us bank
Check #
Date
184907 3/31/2005
Voucher:
184908 3/31/2005
Voucher:
184909 3/31/2005
Voucher:
184910 3/31/2005
Voucher:
184911 3/31/2005
Voucher:
184912 3/31/2005
Voucher:
184913 3/31/2005
l \ Voucher:
\--'¡ 184914 3/31/2005
J Voucher:
184915 3/31/2005
Voucher:
(Continued)
Vendor
Invoice
12378-462975
Inv Date DescriDtion
2/23/2005 PS-G LOVES/SAF ETY SU PP LI I
003138 NORMED
184907
008611 NORTHWEST ARCHAEOLOGI8913
184908
008744 NORTHWEST INSTRUMENT S7924
184909
004280 NORTHWEST JANITORIAL SUOO77633-IN
184910
005386 NORTHWEST PARENT PU8L1~ 1947714
184911
003736 NORTHWEST TOWING INC 9817 2/21/2005
184912 9816 2/22/2005
9709 1/16/2005
000708 NRPA-NAT'L REC & PARK AS£REUTER 05 DUI 3/18/2005
184913
003529 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SEF1844-26 3/16/2005 PS-PRE-EMPL PHYSICAL E>U
184914 1844-25 3/11/2005 PS-J WILSON DRUG SCREEt-.
000891 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN2688920100010 12/17/2004 MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES
184915 843140877000 1/14/2005 MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES
2793687300010 3/11/2005 MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES
26889201 00020 12/22/2004 MC-OF FI CE SUP PLI ES
2692002280010 12/22/2004 MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES
2795343830010 3/14/2005 MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES
2695467280010 2/23/2004 MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES
2795343810010 3/9/2005 MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES
OLSON 3/22/2005 MS-2004 UTILITY TAX REBAT
3/3/2005
3/11/2005 PKlPL-ARCHEOLOGJCAL STU
3/5/2005
3/11/2005 CHB-HOUSEHOLD SUPPLIES
PC-EVIDENSE ANAL YSrS
184916 3/31/2005 008756 OLSON, DONALD W.
Voucher 184916
184917 3/31/2005 007444 ORCA PACIFIC INC
Voucher 184917
184918 3/31/2005
Voucher:
184919 3/31/2005
Voucher:
016080
015891
015952
000504 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER 19207
184918 315514
315787
000034 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAt-598801042-01
184919
3/18/2005
3/412005
3/10/2005
3/8/2005
3/8/2005
3/13/2005
3/17/2005
PKRCS-ADV-PRESCH PRG&S
PS-TOWrNG SERVICES-CASE
PS-TOWING SERVICES CASE
PS-TOWING SERVICES #654
PKM-REUTER NRPA ASSOCI!
AG03-154ASWIMMrNG POOL
AG03-154A:SWrMMING POOL
AG03-154A:SWIMMING POOL
PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI
PKCP-REPAI R/MAI NT SUPPLI
P KCP-RE PAl RIMAI NT SU P P LI
PKRCS-RECREA TION PROGF
Amount Paid
279.81
4,007.08
174.08
325,31
75,00
554.88
309.53
221.95
70.00
187.00
33.00
883,18
478.70
58.29
56,08
36.32
19.43
-18.70
-19.43
45.80
152.09
120.52
72.29
86.26
36.23
11,70
26.85
Check Total
279.81
4,007.08
174.08
325.31
75.00
1,086,36
70.00
220,00
1,493.87
45.80
344.90
134.19
26.85
Page: 15
apChkLst
03f31/2005 10:21 :11AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 16
(Continued)
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor
184920 3/31/2005 006112 OSBORN, STAN
Voucher: 184920
184921 3/31/2005 000705 OSBORNE INNOVATIVE PROEOO12570-IN
Voucher: 184921
184922 3/31/2005001691 OTAK INC
Voucher: 184922
184923 3/31/2005 004004 PACIFIC COAST FORD INC APRIL 05
Voucher: 184923
184924 3/31/2005 006440 rAPE MAC!NERY INC
Voucher: 184924
184925 3/31/2005 000885 PARKER PAINT MANUFACTUf205627
~ Voucher: 184925
- 184926 3/31/2005 003088 PART WOR KS IN C, TH E
c;<::: Voucher: 184926
184927 3/31/2005 008222 PERTEET ! NC
Voucher: 184927
184928 3/31/2005 001166 PETTY CASH - KLAHAN EE
Voucher: 184928
184929 3/31/2005 002822 PETTY CASH-DUMAS BAY CE020484
Voucher: 184929
184930 3/31/2005 006241 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT 020474
Voucher: 184930
184931 3/31/2005 004389 PNTA-PACIFJC NORTHWEST '140767
Voucher: 184931
184932 3/31/2005 001411 POSTAL EXPRESS INC
Voucher: 184932
184933 3/31/2005 008754 PRINCENIV, JOSEPH
Voucher: 184933
184934 3/31/2005 006079 PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER. INC685551N
Voucher: 184934 69751!N
Invoice
Inv Date DescriDtion
ADV TRVL PO 3/29/2005 PKM.WRPA CONF4/4105-4/81(
3/17/2005 PKM.RAPID-DRY FOR CELP~
120443299
230316000
153726
25011.000
24006.007
020500
BM2502003
03-49202
12/15/2004 PWEXPR:12/04 WEYERHAEU
3/18/2005 PS-ARPIL 05 VEHICLE LEASE
2/16/2005 SWM-MACHINERY RENTAL; I
3/2/2005
PKM-PAINT SUPPLIES
Amount Paid
88.00
435.77
155.00
274.41
454,51
61.69
56.99
4,708.31
1.515.00
215.95
119.36
168.00
28.29
5,171.72
90.00
163.74
67.71
Check Total
88.00
435,77
155.00
274.41
454.51
61.69
56.99
6,223.31
215.95
119.36
168.00
28.29
5,171.72
90.00
231 A5
3/18/2005 P KM-F AU C ET UNIT I ACTUATe
3/15/2005 AG05-11:S 336TH @ 1 ST WA~
3/15/2005 PWEXP:COMM CTR REVIEW
3/29/2005 PRCS-PARKING IN SEA TTLE-
3/29/2005 PKDBC-FLOWER PACKS:FRC
3/22/2005 PS-DUPLICA TE KEYS-
3/11/2005 PKKFT-THEATRE EQUIPMEN
2/28/2005 CITY MAIL PROCESSING/COl
3/11/2005 PS-TRAFFIC SCHOOL REFUf\
2/24/2005 PS-SUPPLIES-
3/812005 PS- EXAM GLOVES
Page: 16
. apChkLst
03f31/2005 10:21: 11 AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 17
Bank: kevus bank
(Continued)
'-)
-
--c
Check # Date Vendor Invoice
184936 3/3112005 000051 PUG ET SO UN D EN ER GY ¡ NC 803"299-9735
Voucher: 184936 131-066-1002
345-200-2003
376-488-6325
411-836-8556
250-275-5917
669-650-2001
483-657 -3297
487-650-2008
904-388-1 003
604-130-2008
141-467-1006
330-694-9979
925-940-2007
525-940-2005
006-877 -3456
458-148-1001
017-470-1375
128-255~9812
420-530-2005
100-093-8728
993-440-2000
733-930-2007
733-829-1003
497-198-1008
017-470-7554
250-275-0389
183-469-1 006
190-977 -0008
753-129-1008
233-930-2008
736-169-1 004
873-272 -3351
504-368-1005
017-470-3645
Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
3/18/2005 CHB-(02/05) ELECTRICITY CI- 13,129.39
3/3/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 12,168.69
3/17/2005 PKCP-(03/05)ELECTRICITY CI 2,888.13
3/18/2005 PS-(03/05) ELECTRICITY CHR 1.487,50
3/17/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTR!C 656.66
3/17/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 583.96
3/17/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 399.43
3/21/2005 PWT- 02/05 ELECTRICITY CH 309.96
3/17/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 296.61
3/17/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 224.22
3/17/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 209.29
3/17/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 208.90
3/17/2005 PWT-(03/05) ELECTRICITY C~ 208.82
3/16/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 193.43
3/16/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 189.24
3/18/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 168.42
3/17/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 165.33
3/17/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 162.35
3/21/2005 PWT-(02/05) ELECTRICITY C~ 155.11
3/17/2005 PWT-{03/05) ELECTRICITY C~ 154.83
3/18/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 152.32
3/21/2005 PWT- 02/05 ELECTRICITY CH 147.83
3/16/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 142.77
3/16/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 131.99
3/17/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 124.80
3/16/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 114.23
3/18/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 106.86
3/18/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 106.64
3/21/2005 PWT-(02/05) ELECTRICITY Ct 103.01
3/21/2005 PWT- 02/05 ELECTRICITY CH 87.53
3/16/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 79.42
3/21/2005 PWT- 02/05 ELECTRICITY CH 67.75
3/18/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 66.83
3/17/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 63.55
3/16/2005 PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC 59.65
Page: 17
apChkLst
0313112005 10:21:11 AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 18
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Invoice
Inv Date Descrietion
'N
~
177 -437 -1007 3118/2005
755-430-2005 3116/2005
886-203-1005 3/16/2005
373-087-1 005 3/17/2005
720-429-1004 3/18/2005
917-259-1 001 3/18/2005
156-140.4276 3/18/2005
252-150-2001 3/18/2005
447-269-31773/17/2005
017 -4 70-9253 3/18/2005
156-140-8749 3/16/2005
359-540-2003 3/17/2005
004-919-1000 3/18/2005
357 -656-6131 3/18/2005
156-140-6529 3/4/2005
250-275-4910 3/21/2005
017-470-5400 3/18/2005
657-289-0009 3/18/2005
319-041-1003 3/16/2005
017 -4 70-37 51 3/21/2005
699-699-1003 3/21/2005
184937 3/31/2005 005977 PURE HEALTH SOLUTIONS IN31283 3/10/2005
Voucher: 184937 31283 LATE CHI 3/10/2005
184938 3/31/2005 006860 QUIGG BROS JNC 210519 3/15/2005
Voucher: 184938 210353 2/28/2005
184939 3/31/2005 000202 QWEST 206-204-060947 3/4/2005
Voucher: 184939 253-661-9833 n 3/16/2005
253-946-9943 71: 3/16/2005
0072095 317/2005
184940 3/31/2005 004826 R W BECK INC
Voucher: 184940
184941 3/31/2005 008761 RAY, ROY
Voucher: 184941
184942 3/31/2005 003176 ROAD RUNNER STRIPING INC3735
Voucher: 184942 .
PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTR!C
PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC
PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC
PWT -MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC
PWT-MARCH 2005. ELECTRIC
PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC
PKM-03/05-ELECTRCTY CHR(
PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC
PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC
PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC
P KM-03/05-E LECTR Cry C H R (
PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC
SWM-(03/05)-ELECTRICITY C
PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC
PKM-ELECTRCTY CHRGS
PWT- 02/05 ELECTRICITY CH
PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC
PWT-MARCH 2005 ELECTRIC
P KM-03/05-ELE CTR CTY CH R (
PWT-(02/05) ELECTRICITY C¡'
PWT-(02/05) ELECTRICITY C¡'
PS-BOTTLED WATER SVC
PS-BOTTLED WATER SVC L,o
SWM-I N BO UN D-CO N CRETE
SWM-I N BO U N D-C 0 NCRET E
MSTEl-(O3/05) PHONE/DATA
MSTEl- 03/05 PHONE/DATA ~
MSTEl- 03/05 PHONE/DATA ~
AGO1-117A:JOE'S CRK RGNL
202423
3/25/2005 PRCS-REFUND DUE TO INce
3/11/2005 PKMT/NEW PARKING lOT 6X
Amount Paid
59.18
55.37
53.49
46.81
44.62
42,95
42.56
42,43
40.86
39.12
37.63
36.89
29.33
20.01
19.63
15.07
11.30
6.13
6,12
5,76
5,68
391.68
54,00
173.56
44.28
3,480.28
44.74
44.74
71,031.31
40,00
2,829.89
Check Total
36,176,39
445.68
217.84
3,569.76
71,031.31
40,00
2,829,89
Page: 18
, apChkLst
03/31/2005 10:21:11AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 19
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Descriotion Amount Paid Check Total
184943 3131/2005 000582 RODDA PAINT 18-477891 2/11/2005 CHB-PAINT AND REPAIR SUF 76.66 76.66
Voucher: 184943
184944 3/31/2005 003726 SAFEWAY STORE #1555 1064506 3/11/2005 PKRGS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES 53.01 53.01
Voucher: 184944
184945 3/31/2005 005703 SAFEWAY STORE #3501 804737 3/15/2005 PKRCS.PROGRAM SUPPLIES 8.24
Voucher: 184945 804714 2/15/2005 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES 5.00 13.24
184946 3/31/2005 007140 SCHNEIDER HOMES INC 02-57723 3/22/2005 PW-RElEASE OF ADM DEPO 927.64 927.64
Voucher: 184946
184947 3/31/2005 007226 SEATAC TRANSMISSION 172553 3/17/2005 PS-TRANSMISSION SERVICE 2,022.05 2,022.05
Voucher: 184947
184948 3/3112005 000351 SEA TTl E TI M ES-SU BSCRI PTI, 50680432 3/21/2005 PS-(4/05-06/05) SEATTLE TIM 40.95 40,95
Voucher: 184948
H 184949 3/3112005 000445 SEATTLE-KING CO PUBLIC HEFAOO06691 REN 3/31/2005 PRCS-KlCC - PUBLIC HEAlTI 113.00 113.00
Voucher 184949 '
~ 184950 3/31/2005 001213 SECOMA FENCE [NC 4919 3/11/2005 PWS~REPAIR/MA!NTENANCE 4,538.05 4,538.05
- Voucher: 184950
184951 3/31/2005 005340 SENIOR SERVICES OF SEATT020437 2/05 3/22/2005 PRCS-SR NUTRITION PROGF 372.00 372.00
Voucher: 184951
184952 3/31/2005 001988 SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY 309/4711 3/9/2005 PKRlS-LiNEN SERVICES ACe 19.03 19.03
Voucher: 184952
184953 3/31/2005 002231 SHELDON & ASSOCIATES INC97545 2/28/2005 CDENPR:GETHSEMANE CEM 429.87 429.87
Voucher: 184953
184954 3/31/2005 004763 SHOCKLEY, BILL SHOCKLEY 3/0~ 3/23/2005 CIS-BOOT ALLOWANCE - SH1 99.09 99.09
Voucher: 184954
184955 3/31/2005 002501 SHOPE CONCRETE PRODUC133092 3/2/2005 SWM-REPA!R/MAI NTENANCE 245.45 245.45
Voucher: 184955
184956 3/31/2005 008610 SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOl11471922 3/8/2005 CHB/REPAIR DUCT STATIC S 1,189.16 1,189.16
Voucher: 184956
184957 3/31/2005 003340 SMITH PHD, DAVID H 783 3/3/2005 PS-PRE-EMPL Y PSYCH EVAL 375.00 375.00
Voucher: 184957
184958 3/31/2005 008731 SONG,OK SONG 3/8/2005 MS-2004 UTILITY TAX REBAT 97.51 97.51
Voucher: 184958
Page: 19
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 20
03/31/2005 10:21 :11AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid Check Total
184959 3/31/2005 001885 SPARKS CAR CARE 15205 3/15/2005 MSFTL-AG03-157 VHCS MNT 601.76
Voucher: 184959 15272 3/18/2005 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 367.00
15267 3/1812005 P S-AG03-15 7: VE H I C LES M NT 188.82
15233 3/15/2005 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 90,89
15225 3/15/2005 P S-AG03-15 7: VE H I C L ES M NT 87.04
15179 3/8/2005 P S-AG03-157:VE HI C LE S M NT 54.40
15254 3/16/2005 MSFL T-AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLI 49.56
15180 3/8/2005 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 47.89
15194 ' 3/10/2005 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 33,21
\-\ 15270 3/18/2005 MSFL T-AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLI 29.75
15112 2/25/2005 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 27.20
~ 15245 3/17/2005 PS-AG03-157: VE H !CLES M N T 27.20
15206 3/15/2005 MSFL T-AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLI 27.20
15249 3/17/2005 MSFL T -AUTOMOTIVE SUPPL! 27.20
15269 3/18/2005 MSFL T -AUTOMOTIVE SUPPL 27,20
15153 CR 3/4/2005 PS-REVISED INVOICE - CREC -1,64
14955 CR 3/18/2005 PS-REV!SED !NVOICE - CREC -18.59 1,666.09
184960 3/31/2005 003600 SPILLMAN TECHNOLOGIES 1t'>13477 1017/2004 PS-MS IMAGING MAINTENAN 3,317,32 3,317.32
Voucher: 184960
184961 3/31/2005 006151 SPRINT SPECTRUM 0129395367 - 7 3/16/2005 MSTEL-(02/15-03/14/05) WI RE 926.48 926.48
Voucher: 184961
184962 3/31/2005 007438 SPRINT/ROTH HAMMER INT'L 15189A 2/21/2005 PRCS/KJP - RESCUE TUBES I 261,05 261.05
Voucher: 184962
184963 3/31/2005 006527 ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL 18425 3/22/2005 PKDBC-RENTAL DEPOSIT RE 20.24 20.24
Voucher: 184963
184964 3/31/2005 000872 STAR LAKE GREENHOUSE IN5510 3/15/2005 P KM-POTTED RANAC U L U SIC 288,97 288.97
Voucher: 184964
184965 3/3112005 007819 STATE FARM MUTUAL INS CCO4-01-091-417B 3/18/2005 RISK-04-01-091-4178 DOL 101 43.21 43.21
Voucher: 184965
184966 3/31/2005 008664 STEADFAST PROPERTIES 05-1 00749-00 3/16/2005 C D-R E FU N DOVER P A YM ENT 283,50 283.50
Voucher: 184966
184967 3/31/2005 003307 STERICYCLE INC 0003160733 2/28/2005 PS-WASTE DISPOSAL FEES 10.96 10,96
Voucher: 184967
184968 3/31/2005 008613 STONE, RONALD AG05-20 2/18/2005 PRCS-AG#05-20 LOANED AR" 150.00 150.00
Voucher: 184968
Page: 20
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 21
03/31/2005 10:21 :11AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Descriction Amount Paid Check Total
184969 3/31/2005 005616 STUDIO EAST 1632 3/7/2005 PKKFT -PERFORMANCE:3/12/' 1,500.00 1,500.00
Voucher: 184969
184970 3/31/2005 000308 SUBURBAN CITIES ASSOCIA1750 3/7/2005 CC-FEB SCA MEMBERSHIP rv 180.00 180,00
Voucher: 184970
184971 3/31/2005 008752 SULLIVAN, DANIEL 03-49221 3/11/2005 PS~TRAFFIC SCHOOL REFUr-. 90.00 90.00
Voucher: 184971
184972 3/31/2005 003896 SUMM[T LAW GROUP 25333 3/15/2005 AG03-214A-2/05 PSA 8,490.23 8,490.23
Voucher: 184972
184973 3/31/2005 005910 SUMNER TRACTOR & EQUIP~O1 327094 3/9/2005 PKM-MOWER REPAIR PART~ 106.35 106,35
Voucher: 184973
184974 3/31/2005 000341 SUNRISE SELF STORAGE 278211 3/15/2005 PS-04/05 STRG RENTAL FEE 175.00 175.00
Voucher: 184974
184975 3131/2005 007710 SUPERIOR LINEN SERVICE 338060 3/8/2005 PRCS-FLOOR MAT RENTAL E 48.91 48.91
N Voucher: 184975
~ 184976 3/31/2005 007897 SWANBY, AARON F SWANBY 3/23/2005 MS-2004 UTILITY TAX REBAT 108.20 108.20
Voucher: 184976
184977 3/31/2005 008673 T-MOBILE USA INC 380682348 1/7/2005 MSTEL-12/8/04-1/7/05 CELL S' 500.23
Voucher: 184977 380682348 3/7/2005 MSTEL-2/8/05-3/7/05 CELL SV 221 ,77 722.00
184978 3/31/2005 006255 TEKS SERVICES, INC 3954 3/24/2005 PWSWR-POSTAGE AND HAN 3,243.47 3,243.47
Voucher: 184978
184979 3/31/2005 005623 THUJLLlER, JENN[FER 200508 3/1/2005 PWSWR-D ES I G N/P ROD ucn 325.00 325.00
Voucher: 184979
184980 3/31/2005 001424 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR [143118 3/1/2005 AGO3-199:NEW CH ELEVATO 149.04 149.04
Voucher: 184980
184981 3/31/2005 004218 TIMCO INC 123528 3/11/2005 PW-REPA[R SUPPLIES 32.55 32.55
Voucher: 184981
184982 3/31/2005 004219 TRAFFIC DATA GATHER[NG 2467 2/28/2005 PWT-MANUAL COUNT FOR B 600.00 600.00
Voucher: 184982
184983 3/31/2005 005913 TROUT UNLIMITED 194369 1/13/2005 PKRCS-REFUND RENTAL DE 300.00 300.00
Voucher: 184983
184984 3/3112005 008074 TRUGREEN LANDCARE LLè 3234175042 2/28/2005 CHB/LANDSCAPE MONTH OF 62.73 62.73
Voucher: 184984
184985 3/31/2005 001715 TR U G R E E N-C HEM LAWN 3234175040 2/28/2005 PKDBC - LANDSCAPING 2/281 162.05
Voucher: 184985 3234175041 2/28/2005 PKM-FAC:LANDSCAPE MANA 41.34 203.39
Page: 21
apChkLst
03131/2005 10:21 :11AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 22
(Continued)
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor
184986 3/31/2005 005745 TSUJI. M¡YOSHI
Voucher: 184986
184987 3/31/2005 008129 US LATEX PRODUCTS INC 174
Voucher: 184987
184988 3/31/2005 002426 UNITED GROCERS CASH & C¡37243 2/2/2005 PKRCS.PROGRAM SUPPLIES
Voucher: 184988 18179 10/12/2004 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES
42478 3/3/2005 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES
18180 10/12/2004 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES
\-\ 43753 3/10/2005 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES
~ 184989 3/31/2005 003837 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 0000F6588V115 3/12/2005 PS-D. ELiVERY SERVICE
i. Voucher: 184989 0000F6588V125 3/19/2005 PS-DELJVERY SERVICE
184990 3/3112005 005019 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE46849976-001 3/22/2005 PKM-JUTE BLANKET W/STAP
Voucher: 184990 46549127-001 3/7/2005 PKM-SOD CUTTER RENTAL
46572026-001 3/8/2005 SWM-CI P /EO PMT RENT AL/S l
0071856-IN 3/4/2005 CM-PRINTING & BINDING OF
0075662-IN 3/7/2005 CM-PRINTING & BINDING OF
0071857-JN 3/7/2005 CM-PRINTING & BINDING OF
0080150-!N 2/21/2005 CM-PRINTING OF ARCHITEC"
184992 3/3112005 003563 VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS COO03665 3/10/2005 PS-(03/05-04/05) EMER DISP/>
Voucher: 184992
184993 3/31/2005005390 VALLEY MANUFACTURING ¡ N~ 111422
Voucher: 184993
184994 3/31/2005 007888 VANIR CONSTRUCTION MGMFEB 2005
Voucher: 184994
184995 3/31/2005 001124 VE R 120 N WI RE LESS
Voucher: 184995
184996 3/31/2005 006857 VP CO N S U L TI N G J NC 00006749 1/24/2005
Voucher: 184996 00006695 12/7/2004
184997 3/31/2005 001061 WA STATE AGRICULTURE DEL YBECK 05 RE~ 3/15/2005
Voucher: 184997 THOMAS 05 R E 3/15/2005
184998 3/31/2005 004258 WA STATE DEPT OF LlCENSJlFEB 2005 3/16/2005
Voucher: 184998
184999 3/31/2005 000253 W A STATE D EPT OF TRANS P RE-313-A TB503 3/15/2005 PWSC I P-P R OJ E CT MANAG E ~
Voucher: 184999
Invoice
Inv Date Descriction
3/11/2005 P R CS-3/11/05-5/4/05 ART 0 I S I
ARTWORK
3/1/2005
PS-EXAM GLOVES
184991 3/31/2005 007357 UNITED REPROGRAPHICS
Vouche~ 184991
3/2/2005
PRCS/KJP PROMOTIONAL CC
3/18/2005 AG04-187:COMM CTR MGMT
1933868962
3/13/2005 MSTEL-3/05-CELL AIR TIME
MSDP.LASERFICHE ST ANDAI
MS-RICOH SCANNER
PWS-MEMBERSHIP RENEW/>
PWS.PESTtCIDE LICENSE RE
PS-(MTH04) REMIT CPl FEES
Amount Paid
150.00
333.95
167.73
79,23
69,08
41.78
27.25
19.05
9.25
434.03
50.24
27.18
77.33
24.10
13.66
8.16
187,824,50
537,04
12,218.13
73.19
5,060,00
335.00
25.00
25.00
516.00
38.53
Check Total
150,00
333,95
385.07
28.30
511.45
123.25
187,824.50
537.04
12,218.13
73.19
5,395.00
50.00
516.00
38.53
Page: 22
. apChkLst
03/31/2005 10 :21 :11 AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 23
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid Check Total
185000 3/31/2005 003825 W A STATE DE PT 0 F TRAN SP R E41 JA5057 LO 1 3/15/2005 AG03-200 :2/05 1-5 TO CITY C f\ 619,50 619.50
Voucher: 185000
185001 3/31/2005 000340 WA STATE INFORMATION SEI2005010212 2/2/2005 MSDP-MS SOFTWARE ASSUI 24,583.28
Voucher: 185001 2005020217 3/2/2005 MSTEL-(02/05) SCAN SERVIC 1,136.94 25,720.22
185002 3/31/2005 004628 WA STATE PATROL IDENTIFICI05017601 3/4/2005 PS-FEB 05 FINGERPRINT BA( 480.00 480.00
Voucher: 185002
185003 3/31/2005 001162 WA STATE RECYCLING 28-0RSOW RE~ 3/24/2005 PWSWR-MEMBERSHIP RENE 250.00 250.00
Voucher: 185003
185004 3/31/2005 006853 WAHl, PRAN 03/05/05 318/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE 100,00 1 00.00
Voucher: 185004
185005 3/31/2005 006980 WALKER, RONALD A 03-39644 9/23/2002 PS-TRAFFI SCHOOL REFUNC 50.00 50.00
Voucher: 185005
185006 3/31/2005 008252 WASHINGTON PAVE 18426 3/22/2005 PKDBC-RENTAL DEPOSIT RE 150.00 150,00
~ Voucher: 185006
185007 3/31/2005 000783 WASTE MANAGEMENT 441859 3/1/2005 PWSWR-XMAS TREE RECYC 3,660.73 3,660.73
Voucher: 185007
185008 3/31/2005 008737 WATTS SPECIALTIES INC 4422 2/1712005 PS-WELD CHAINS AND D-Rlf\ 277.44 277.44
Voucher: 185008
185009 3/3112005 005565 WELCOME COMMUNICATION 4225 3/16/2005 MSDP/PS - PORTABLE RADle 460.65
Voucher: 185009 4232 3/21/2005 PS-CAR CHARGER, ADAPTEf 187.01 647.66
185010 3/31/2005 007876 WELLS, GREGORY 03105 TUITION F 3/10/2005 3/05 TUITION REIMBURSEME 159.00 159.00
Voucher: 185010
185011 3/31/2005 002038 WEST COAST BUSINESS GRJ18701 3/11/2005 PS-ALARM REGISTRATION A 902.94 902.94
Voucher: 185011
185012 3/31/2005 000173 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 808529778 2/28/2005 MSDP-DATABASE ACCESS $' 1,213.81 1,213,81
Voucher: 185012
185013 3/31/2005 000541 WESTERN EQUIPMENT DISTF409399 3/2/2005 MSFL T-TORO MOWER REPAi 492.87 492.87
Voucher: 185013
185014 3/31/2005 001427 WESTERN POWER & EQUIPMJ88054 314/2005 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 93.35 93.35
Voucher: 185014
185015 3/31/2005 002204 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY 718607 RI 3/8/2005 PWS-MAI NTENANC E S U PP LJ I 13.42 13.42
Voucher: 185015
185016 3131/2005 005680 WILD WEST INTERNATIONAL 3788 2/28/2005 PS-FtRING RANGE FEE SVCS 76.16 76.16
Voucher: 185016
Page: 23
apChkLst
03/3112005 10:21 :11 AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 24
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Invoice
185017 3/31/2005 701680 WI LSO N, JEFFERY W
Vouche~ 185017 .
185018 3/31/2005 000660 WOODWORTH & COMPANY 112512
Voucher: 185018
185019 3/31/2005 000947 YOUR INC
Voucher: 185019
185020 3/31/2005 000694 lEE MEDICAL SERVICE COMf68838863
Voucher: 185020 68838866
68838865
JURY REIMB
3168
\-1
~
Inv Date Descriction Amount Paid
3/21/2005 MC-3/21 105 JURY REIMB 29,72
3/812005 SWM-ASPHAL T 123.18
3/20/2005 AG02-48:3/0S PS JANITORIAL 2,218.00
3/22/2005 PKM-FIRST AID SUPPLIES FC 123.11
3/22/2005 PKM-FJRST AID SUPPLIES FC 110.11
3/22/2005 PKM-FIRST AID SUPPLIES FC 83.10
Sub total for us bank:
Check Total
29.72
123.18
2,218.00
316.32
697,748.41
Page: 24
" apChkLst
03/31/2005 10:21:11AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 25
261 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks:
697,748.41
N
~
Page: 25
apChkLst
03/3112005 10:21:11AM
, Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 26
Bank code: key
Check # Date
184935 3/31/2005
\-,
~
Page: 26
\-1
~
~
apChkLst
03/22/2005
9:38:03AM
Bank: key us bank
Check #
Date
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Vendor
Invoice
Inv Date Descriotion
2128/2005 FEBRUARY 2005 OFFICE SUPPL
2128/2005 FEBRUARY OFFICE SUPPLIES
314/2005 PS-O4-17506 FFCL ORDER RETU
3117/2005 MSF-FEB 05 SCHL IMPACT FEES
02-56242
EMPLOYEE REIM 3/14/2005
PW-BOND RELEASE COMPLETIC
Amount Paid
767.24
4.862.60
430.00
36,421.00
310.65
2,289.00
4,039.64
58.833.23
Sub total for us bank:
Page: 1
Check Total
767.24
4,862.60
430.00
36,421.00
310.65
2,289.00
4,039.64
58,833.23
107,953.36
184752 3/2212005
Voucher:
184753 3/22/2005
Voucher:
184754 3/22/2005
Voucher:
184755 3/2212005
Voucher:
184756 3/22/2005
Voucher:
184757 3/22/2005
Voucher:
184758 3/22/2005
Voucher:
184759 3/22/2005
Voucher:
000007 BOISE OFFICE SOLUTIONS
184752
000063 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE FEB05
184753
008738 DAVIS, DEE
184754
001893 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICSIF-FEB 2005
184755
008509 JENSEN, BRYCE
184756
008739 SOUTH PARK BUILDING LLC
184757
005253 US BANCORP
184758
005722 YAKIMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT .JANUARY 05
184759
FEB 2005
04-17506
FEB2005
KJP-3/2-315/05 CONF LODGING R
3/1512005
3/4/2005
212005 US BANK VISA
21112005
PS-JAN 05 JAIL SVCS AGOO-167'
Page: 1
apChkLst
03/2212005
9:38:03AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 2
N
~
¿
8 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks:
107,953.36
Page: 2
apChkLst Final Check list Page: 1
04/15/2005 11 : 15: 20AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Descriotion Amount Paid Check Total
185021 41712005 005622 CHELAN COUNTY TREASUREAPPLE CUP 05 3/25/2005 PS-EXPLORER COMPETITIOr 445.00 445.00
Voucher: 185021
185022 4114/2005 004004 PACIFIC COAST FORD lNC MARCH 2005 3/1/2005 PS-MARCH 05 VEHICLE LEAS 274.41 274.41
Voucher: 185022
185023 4/14/2005 000302 KING COUNTY RECORDS,ELE02-60255 4/5/2005 CD-KC RECORDING FEE STA 20.00 20.00
Voucher: 185023
185024 4114/2005 000302 KING COUNTY RECORDS,ELE02-60268 4/6/2005 CD-KC RECORDING FEE WA 91.00 91.00
Voucher: 185024
185025 4/15/2005 000332 ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS IN'0094457-1 2/28/2005 LAW: MNTHL Y SRV CHRG: IN 101.00
Voucher: 185025 0095776-1 3/31/2005 LAW: MNTHL Y SRV CHRG: IN 101.00 202.00
185026 4115/2005 000385 ACCOUNTEMPS 13074143 4/5/2005 MSF-TRUONG WIC 4/1/05 TEl 2,200.00
\-\ Voucher: 185026 13028579 3/29/2005 MSF-3/25/05 M TROUNG TEM 2,200.00
13012020 3/28/2005 MSF-3/25/05 J TIBBLES TEMP 936.40
\j~ 13073141 4/5/2005 MSF-TIBBLES W/E 4/1/05 TEr<. 901.29 6,237.69
-- 185027 4/15/2005 000109 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL 13661 3/9/2005 PKM-GRD MTN LOCKSMITH ~ 55.12
Voucher: 185027 13676 3/22/2005 PKM-GRD MTN LOCKSMITH ~ 50.77
13667 3/10/2005 PKM-GRD MTN LOCKSMITH ~ 50.77
13681 3/25/2005 PKCP-LOCKSMITH SVCS 48.85
13665 3/10/2005 PKM-GRD MTN LOCKSMITH ~ 37.88
13680 3/25/2005 PS-LOCKSMJTH SVCS 11.09 254.48
185028 4115/2005 000568 AGRI SHOP INC 227985 3/17/2005 PKM-MOWER REPAIR 73.37
Voucher: 185028 228008 3/17/2005 PKM-MOWER REPAIR 34.27 107.64
185029 4/15/2005 008794 AHKIONG, LARRY 203779 4/14/2005 PRCS-CANEL RENTAL FOR 6 765.00 765.00
Voucher: 185029
185030 4/15/2005 005225 AIRGAS- NOR PAC INC 101593483 11/10/2004 PS-TYVEK COVERALL S 30.04 30.04
Voucher: 185030
185031 4/15/2005 000475 ALARM CENTERS/CUSTOM SI382051 3/20/2005 PKCP- Q2 2005 ALRM MNTR- 120.00
Voucher: 185031 382050 3/20/2005 PKCP- 022005 ALARM MTR/ 120.00
382049 3/20/2005 PKKFT-2ND QTR05 ALRM MN 60.00
382018 3/20/2005 PKRCS-04/05/05 ALRM MNTR 59.74
185032 4/15/2005 008790 ALMQUIST, NANCY ALMQUSIT 4/7/2005 MS-2005 UTILITY TAX REFUN 83.89
Voucher: 185032
185033 4/15/2005 001285 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-69087 3/28/2005 PKM-GRAFFITI SCRUBS 234.99
Voucher: 185033 TM-69115 3/29/2005 PKM-HOUSEHOLD SUPPLIES 63.92
359.74
. 83.89
298.91
Page: 1
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2
04/15/2005 11: 15 :20AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
Check # Date - Vendor Invoice Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid Check Total
185034 4/15/2005 005614 AMB TOOLS & EQUIPMENT C(263975 3/30/2005 PKM-HOSE AND COUPLER 90.57 90.57
Voucher: 185034
185035 4/1512005 003645 AMERICAN JANITORIAL SVCS3824 3/8/2005 AG04-09:2/05 DBC JNTRL SVC 5,466.65
Voucher: 185035 3865 4/8/2005 PKDBC-3/05 JANITORIAL SEFi 4, 120AO
3866 4/8/2005 PKDBC-KNUTZEN CUSTODIA 560.00
3867 4/8/2005 PKM-JANITORIAL SERVICE 420.00 10.567.05
185036 4/15/2005 003427 AMERICAN LOCKER SECURIT 450251 3/31/2005 PKM-LOCK SUPPLIES 24.85 24.85
Voucher: 185036
185037 4/15/2005 001522 AMERICAN RED CROSS 10006972 3/23/2005 PRCS-FIRST AID/CPR TRAINI 84,00
Voucher: 185037 10006305 2/2/2005 PRCS-FIRST A!D/CPR TRAIN! 18.00 102.00
185038 4115/2005 000190 APA-AMERICAN PLANNINGA~030605-082347 3/2/2005 CDA - ZONING PRACTICE NE 65.00 65.00
Voucher: 185038
'\-4 185039 4/15/2005 000859 APWA SPRING CONFERENCE7671 3/29/2005 PWST-BRIAN TO ATTEND 20( 310.00
Voucher 185039 7651 3/29/2005 PWST-AL TO ATTEND 2005 S 310.00
'? 7675 3/29/2005 PWST-MARWAN TO ATTEND 310.00 930.00
185040 4/15/2005 002534 ARBORSCAN INC 5778 3/31/2005 PARKS/PW LANDSCAPE MAlt 892.16 892.16
Voucher: 185040
185041 4/15/2005 005715 ARCH WIRELESS HOLDINGS IA6163838D 4/2/2005 MSTEL-04/05 PAGER LEASE 334.39 334.39
Voucher: 185041
185042 4/15/2005 000075 AT&T WI R ElESS & C I N GU LAF50273 7 422 4/2/2005 MSTEL-(03/05) CELL AJR TIME 62.73 62.73
Voucher: 185042
185043 4115/2005 000075 AT&T WIRELESS & CINGULAFO033654119 3/28/2005 M 5T EL -(2/27/05-3/26/05) CELL 32.95 32.95
Voucher: 185043
185044 4115/2005 005587 AVAYAINC 2720895405 4/4/2005 M!S-(03/05) VM MAINT. ONLY 473.55 473.55
Voucher: 185044
185045 4/15/2005 004128 BAGNELL INC 8713 3/30/2005 SWM-PRINTING SERVICES; P 100.89 100.89
Voucher: 185045
185046 4/15/2005 008792 BAILEY, GENEVA BAILEY 4/6/2005 MS-2005 UTILITY TAX REFUN 97.71 97.71
Voucher: 185046
185047 4/15/2005 001790 BARGREEN ELLINGSON INC 4524643 3/28/2005 CHB-TUSCAN SMOKING REC 169,73 169.73
Voucher: 185047
185048 4/15/2005 004238 BEACON BALLFIELDS 0360846-IN 3/3/2005 PKM-HOME PLATES 666.11 666.11
Voucher: 185048
185049 4/15/2005 008768 BEDELL. BILL 13135 1/10/2005 PRCS-REFUND NAPSTERS V 136.00 136.00
Voucher: 185049
Page: 2
apChkLst
04f15/20 05 11 : 15 :20AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 3
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor
185050 4/15/2005 007467 BEERY + ELSNER LLP
Vouche~ 185050
185051 4/15/2005 007247 BENSEN, MARK
Voucher: 185051
185052 4/15/2005 001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO 11425818
Voucher: 185052 417013-01
422944
419639-01
421492
422031
423643
MAR 2005
(Continued)
Invoice
6392
Inv Date DescriDtion
AG03-65C:PSA-LGL SVCS RE
4/112005
BENSEN MILEA 4/11/2005 PS-BENSEN MILEAGE 04/05
185053 4/15/2005 000007 BOISE OFFICE SOLUTIONS
L i Voucher: 185053
\ -, 185054 4/15/2005 008204 BRUNS, NEL L
~ Voucher: 185054
<."j 185055 4/1512005 008263 au DG ET PR INTI N G
Voucher: 185055
185056 4/15/2005 008777 BUTLER, KEVIN
Voucher: 185056
BRUNS
7083-1
6769-3
BASKETBALL
3128/2005
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
3/23/2005
3124/2005
3/18/2005
3/18/2005
3/31/2005
PS-UN!FORM OR BOOTS-POI
PS-UNIFORM OR BOOTS- KE
PS-UNIFORM OR BOOTS- SU
PS-UNIFORM OR BOOT- FTU
PS-UNIFORM OR BOOTS- DR
PS-UNIFORM OR BOOTS- *S~
PS-UNIFORM OR BOOTS- DE
MARCH OFFICE SUPPLIES
3/30/2005 MSF-2005 UTILITY TAX REFU
3/22/2005 MSHR-PRINTING SVCS
3/22/2005 MSHR-PRINTING SVCS
4/2/2005 PRCS-BASKETBALL OFFICIAl
Amount Paid
1,005.85
234.70
252.89
92.43
76.15
43.47
20.67
17.41
13.06
1,368.49
47.76
1,034.69
912.83
65.00
Check Total
1,005.85
234.70
516.08
1,368.49
47.76
1,947.52
65.00
Page:3
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4
04/1512005 11: 15: 20AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Contínued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Iny Date DescriDtion Amount Paid Check Total
185057 4/15/2005 000414 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC9978 4/1/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING sve: 2,203.20
Voucher: 185057 9977 4/1/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING SVC: 1,717.92
9973 4/1/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING sve: 1,509.60
9987 4/1/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING sve: 1,220.60
9976 4/112005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING SVC: 1 , 145.70
9990 411/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING SVC: 1,142.60
9982 4/1/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATER!NG SVC: 1.046.02
9980 4/1/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING SVC: 985.80
9972 3/31/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING SVC: 714.00
9979 4/1/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING SVC: 603.96
9984 4/1/2005 PKDBC- 3105 CATERING SVC: 357,00
9985 4/1/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING SVC: 349,50
N 9983 4/1/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING SVC: 325.44
",j 9986 4/1/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING SVC: 292.60
-C 9974 4/1/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING SVC: 270.72
9989 4/1/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING sve: 195.48
9916 3/23/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING SVC: 74.62
9981 4/1/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING sve: 59.76
9917 3/23/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING SVC: 47,60
9975 4/1/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING SVC: 41.50
9988 4/1/2005 PKDBC- 3/05 CATERING SVC: 35.64 14,339.26
185058 4/15/2005 003093 CASCADE COMPUTER MAINT9099629 4/7/2005 MSDP-(05/05) PRINTER MAIN' 750.72 750,72
Voucher: 185058
185059 4115/2005 002351 CASCADE MOBILE MIX CONC 19385 3/21/2005 SWM-2005 ASPHALT OVERlJ 176.80
Voucher: 185059 19407 3/28/2005 SWM=CONCRETE 226 S. 315' 157.76 334.56
185060 4/15/2005 008481 CENTRE POINTE SURVEYING2304d 3/30/2005 PARKING lOT/GRADING. CUI 1,127.50 1,127.50
Voucher: 185060
185061 4/15/2005 001481 CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC 3501297 3/10/2005 AG03-152:2/05 PAC HWY SO I 79,125.60 79,125.60
Voucher: 185061
185062 4115/2005 002889 CITY OF BELLEVUE 04/05 MOTOR S 3/24/2005 PS-MOTOR SCHOOL, O'NEil 140.00 140.00
Voucher: 185062
Page: 4
apChkLst
04/15(2005 11 :15:20AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 5
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice
185063 4/15/2005 000142 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE CK#2193
Voucher: 185063 C K#2194
CK#2189
CK#2191
CK#2192
CK#2190
AG#05-40 #1
AG#04-189 #3
AG#05-037 #1
0001514
185070 4/15/2005 008759 COIN TECH SERVICES INC
Voucher: 185070
185071 4/15/2005 008763 COLLINS, CLINTON "TONY" COLLINS BOOT 4/7/2005 PKM-WORK BOOTS/COLLINS
Voucher 185071
185072 4/15/2005 005208 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTICMAR 2005
Voucher: 185072
185073 4/15/2005 008548 CONLEN, ISAAC
Voucher 185073
185074 4/15/2005 008381 CONOCOPHILLJPS FLEET 870165123503 3/26/2005 PS-FLEET FUEL
Voucher: 185074
185075 4/1512005 008445 COPIERS NORTHWEST INC 20365 1
Voucher: 185075 206.56 1
185064 4/15/2005 000951 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Voucher: 185064
185065 4/15/2005 005817 CITY OF FIFE
Voucher: 185065
185066 4/15/2005 003551 CITY OF KENT
Voucher: 185066
\-1185067 4/15/2005 004783 CITY OF RENTON
Voucher: 185067
. ~ 185068 4/15/2005 004921 CLOWNS UNLIMITED INC
Voucher: 185068
185069 4/15/2005 003752 COASTWIDE SUPPLY DBA
Voucher: 185069
RI2872
06615
5309
T1483126
T1486687
T1483117-1
T1483117 -2
T1483117
T 1486687-1
12584
Inv Date De$criøtion Amount Paid
3/23/2005 PS-3/15-3/20/05 T HOCH CAlf 738,24
3/24/2005 P S-3/15-3/20105 G WI LSO N C} 738.24
3/31/2005 PS-K paN 2/20/05-2/25/05 RA[ 684.00
3/21/2005 PS-316-3/9/05 L MURRAY PRA 323.93
3/10/2005 PS-3/6-3/9/05 J DEMAREST PI 323.93
3/3/2005 PS-2/28-3/2/05 S TEMPLETON 285.64
4/11/2005 AG#05-40 EVIDENCE BU!LDIt-. 3,810.89
3/412005 AG04-189A:RET HELD-STATE 1,299.41
4/8/2005 AG#05-37 SW 356TH ST REGI 1,122.20
3/3/2005 PS-(02/05) JAIL SVCS AG01-7: 24,207.07
3/21/2005 PS-FL T SERVICES 11104-03/0:
2/1/2005 CDHS 2005 MOU PYMNT
3/22/2005 PKRC-FESTIVAL DAYS WRIS'
3/22/2005 PKRCS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE
3/3012005 PKRCS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE
3/23/2005 PKRCS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE
3/29/2005 PKRCS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE
3/22/2005 PKRCS~JAN!TORIAL SUPPLIE
4/812005 PKRCS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE
3/3/2005 MSHR-WELLNESS VENDING
9,806.79
55,250.00
27.20
404.22
277.96
190.44
75.40
48.92
9.11
1,876.80
206.71
3/31/2005 MARCH 2005 PRO CARD CHÞ
12,910.94
Check Total
3,093.98
6,232.50
24,207.07
9,806.79
55,250,00
27.20
1,006.05
1,876.80
206.71
12,910.94
57,20
43.51
356.82
EMPLOYEE REI 4/7/2005
CDPL-PBLC NOTICE SIGNS {,
57.20
43.51
3/28/2005 MIS:PRINTER & FAX TONER I
4/512005 MIS:PRINTER & FAX TONER I
203.89
152.93
Page: 5
apChkLst
04/15/2005 11 : 15: 20AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 6
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice
185076 4/15/2005 000721 CO R LI S S R ESO U R C ES ¡ NC 49394
Voucher: 185076 49393
49738
185077 4/15/2005 000063 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICMAR 2005
Voucher 185077
185078 4/15/2005 000771 COSTCO/HSBC BUSINESS SCMAR 2005
Voucher: 185078
185079 4/15/2005 000854 D J TROPHY 00215763
Vouche~ 185079 00215854
\-i 00215815
VJ 185080 4/1512005 000168 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMER3166011
('"'" Voucher: 185080
185081 4/15/2005 007397 DAVID A CLARK ARCHITECTS238
Voucher 185081
185082 4/15/2005 006395 DAVIS, ERIC
Voucher: 185082
185083 4/15/2005 005922 DEX MEDIA WEST
Voucher: 185083
185084 4/15/2005 008501 DIGITAL PRINT SERVICES 33923
Voucher: 185084
185085 4/15/2005 008039 DMX MUSIC
Voucher: 185085
185086 4/15/2005 005341 DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA DODD 4/5/05 4/5/2005
Voucher: 185086 DODD 04/01/05 411/2005
DODD 03/29/05 3129/2005
DODD 3/25/05 A 3/25/2005
DODD 3/25/058 3/25/2005
DODD 3/28/05 3/28/2005
000004/07105 4/8/2005
47217 3/29/2005
Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid
3/22/2005 PWS- CRUSHED ROCK 385.13
3/22/2005 PWS- CRUSHED ROCK 374.79
3/24/2005 PWS- CRUSHED ROCK 100.04
3/31/2005 MARCH 2005 OFFICE SUPPLI 5,633,56
3/26/2005 MARCH 2005 COSTCO CHGS
205.63
3/22/2005 CDHS HSC NAMEPLATES
4/1/2005 PKRCS-NAMES PLATES/PLAC
3/29/2005 PS-ENGRAVING SERVICES
3/29/2005 PKPL-AD - CONTRACTOR'S F
56.20
53.09
18.39
159.80
ADV TRVl
3/29/2005 AG03-158A:ARCH DSGN SVC:
190.00
3/24/2005 PS-PER DIEM ADV TRVl DT I
19,748.89
025137885000 3/22/2005 P KDBC&KFT -( 05/04) Of RECTC
410.60
A018557
3/31/2005 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES
79,38
11/1/2004 MJS-(10/04) DBS STANDARD
185087 4/15/2005 008027 DOWNTOWN HARLEY INC
Voucher 185087
453.59
MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE~
MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE~
MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE~
MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE~
MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE~
MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE~
MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE
PS-MOTO R CYC lE
140.00
130.00
100.00
80.00
80.00
80.00
80.00
250.68
Check Total
859.96
5,633.56
205.63
127.68
159.80
19.748.89
190.00
410.60
453.59
79.38
690.00
250,68
Page: 6
apChkLst FinalCheck List Page: 7
04/15/2005 11 : 15: 20AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid Check Total
185088 4/15/2005 007548 DOXTATER & COMPANY llC HWR032305 3/23/2005 AG04-143:KOREAN FESTIVAL 9,005.81
Voucher: 185088 HWR041205 4/12/2005 AG04-143:KOREAN FESTIVAL 6,965.78
HWR033005 3/30/2005 AG04-143:KOREAN FESTIVAL 6,051.21
HWR040405 4/4/2005 AG04-143:KOREAN FESTIVAL 5,431.50
HWR040105 4/1/2005 AG04-143:KOREAN FESTIVAL 3,100.00 30,554.30
185089 4/15/2005 005842 DPK INC AG#03-101 #20 3/15/2005 AG03-101B:PAC HWY HOV Lf\ 107,306.07 107,306.07
Voucher: 185089
185090 4/15/2005 000939 DS WATERS OF AMERICA, lP2030702-15 3/31/2005 PKRCS-WTR/Cl RNTl ACCT 38.46 38.46
Voucher: 185090
185091 4/1512005 008775 DUNBAR, IRA BASKETBAll 4/212005 PRCS-BASKETBAllOFFICIAI 130.00 130.00
Voucher: 185091
185092 4/1512005 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (1040503 4/2/2005 PS-REPAIR SVCS/MNT 444.01
\-\ Voucher: 185092 1040258 3/21/2005 PS-REPAIR SVCS/MNT 199.67
v,\ 1040324 3/25/2005 PS-REPAIR SVCS/MNT 18.49
-J 1040414 3/30/2005 PS-REPAIR SVCS/MNT 18.49
1040339 3/25/2005 PS-REPAIR SVCS/MNT 18.49
1040372 3/28/2005 PS-REPAIR SVCS/MNT 18.49 717,64
185093 4115/2005 006177 EARL, SHARYN l YNN 050027 3/4/2005 CM~MAGAZ!NE AD FOR CEO 225.00
Voucher: 185093 050025 2/25/2005 PRCS-CElEBRATION PARK F 135.00
050030 3/31/2005 KJP-POOL SCHEDULE SUMM 75.00
050032 4/4/2005 PRCS-POSTERS MOTHER'S! 30.00
050034 4/6/2005 CM-UPDATE CITY BROCHUR 30.00
050028 3/7/2005 CC-CERTIFICATES FOR COM 22.50
050029 3/7/2005 KJP. 2 POSTERS FOR POOL: 22.50 540.00
185094 4/15/2005 008141 EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS 2637740 3/16/2005 SWM-REAPIR AND MAJNTENI 386.79 386.79
Voucher: 185094
185095 4/15/2005 006514 ENGINEERING BUSINESS SY~21029 4/5/2005 MSDP-SVC & MAJNT-KIP 2000 263,07 263.07
Voucher; 185095
185096 4/15/2005 008709 ENTCO INTERNATIONAL !NC 55026M 4/8/2005 CDHS VOL DINNER MYSTER' 1,612.50 1,612.50
Voucher: 185096
185097 4/15/2005 001046 EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATI9211705 3/24/2005 PS-(03/05) CREDIT REPORT~ 20.77 20.77
Voucher: 185097
185098 4/1512005 000328 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) 0188574 3/31/2005 PS-FUEl FOR VEHICLES 7,655.81
Voucher: 185098 0188573 3/31/2005 MSFL T-VEHICLE FUEL 3,012.86 10,668.67
Page: 7
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8
04/15/2005 11 : 15: 20AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
185099 4/15/2005 002366 ESM CONSULTING ENGINEEF53354 3/25/2005 CABIN PARK: ENGINEERING 940.50 940,50
Voucher: 185099
1851 00 4/15/2005 002985 ESRI BUSINESS IN FOR SOLU'91 092465 3/29/2005 MSGIS-ARC¡NFO ANNUAL MP 9,647.60 9,647.60
Voucher: 185100
1851 01 4/15/2005 002227 ETTINGER, ROBERT 12/04-3/05 MILE 3/23/2005 PRCS-ETTINGER MILEAGE.R 258.39 258.39
Voucher: 185101
185102 4/15/2005 004840 EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE 104163 3/23/2005 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES E 90.63
Voucher:. 185102 104164 3/23/2005 PS-M¡SC REPAIR/SUPPLIES 43.52 134,15
185103 4/15/2005 001131 EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTRIC8947 3/7/2005 MSFL T-REPA!R/MAINT SVCS' 321.66 321.66
~ Voucher: 185103
. ) 1851 04 4/15/2005 006258 EXPRESS BUSINESS SYSTEN37957 3/10/2005 MSMD-MA!NT/FOLDER-I NSEF 1,317,05 1,317.05
\JJ Voucher: 185104
CG 1851 05 4/1512005 008791 FAHEY. EDITH FAHEY . 4/7/2005 MS-2005 UTILITY TAX REFUN 41,89 41,89
Voucher: 185105
185106 4/15/2005 008647 FASTENAL WAFED100196 3/30/2005 SWM-SMALL TOOLS; 1Q-INCf- 11.75 11,75
Voucher: 185106
185107 4/15/2005 000217 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPOR5-452-89311 4/812005 MSDP-DELIVERY SERVICES 25,36
Voucher: 185107 5-439-62664 3/25/2005 MS F-DEL IVERY. S ERV¡ C ES 10.97
5-450-83611 4/1/2005 MSHR-DELIVERY SERVICE 8.81 45,14
1851 08 4/15/2005 000229 FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER CO1886 4/1/2005 CM- TOURISM CONTRACT FC 250.00 250.00
Voucher: 185108
185109 4/15/2005 000220 FEDERAL WAY EXECUTEL 500429 3/15/2005 P KKFT -LO DG I NG: ECC L ESTO 310.24 310.24
Voucher: 185109
185110 4/15/2005 004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR 006129 3/19/2005 SWM-(03/19/05) NEWSP ADS! 239.04
Voucher: 185110 006133 3/19/2005 CDPL-(03/19/05) LEGALS- 123.50
006130 3/19/2005 CD P L -( 03/19/05) LEGALS- 99.60
006154 3/30/2005 CDPL-(03/30/05) LEGALS- 90.30
006150 3/26/2005 CDPL-(O3/26/05) LEGALS- 90.30
006149 3/26/2005 CDPL-(O3/26/05) LEGALS- 90.30
006131 3/19/2005 CDPL-(03/19/05) LEGALS- 86.32
006137 3/23/2005 CDPL-(03/23/05) LEGALS- 73.04
006132 3/19/2005 CDPL-(O3/19/05) LEGALS- 70.38
006128 3/19/2005 MSDP-(03/19/05) NEWSPAPEI 53.12 1,015.90
Page: 8
apChkLst
04/15/2005 11 : 15 :20AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 9
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice
185111 4/15/2005 001055 FEDERAL WAY SYMPHONY 3/6105
Voucher: 185111 2/6/05
4/3/05
185112 4/15/2005 001593 FEDERAL WAY TOWI NG INC 24419B
Vouche~ 185112
185113 4/15/2005 002955 FERRE LLS FIRE EXTI NG U ISH 2491
Voucher: 185113 2492
2493
05-1627
185114 4/15/2005 004910 FI LETEX LLC
Vouche~ 185114
185115 4115/2005 001686 FIRST CHOICE BUSINESS MAOO030586
Voucher: 185115
185116 4/15/2005 008361 FIRST CHOICE BUSINESS MA050571 09271
Voucher: 185116
'\-\ 185117 4/15/2005 006028 FR E EBORN LAW a FF ICES P SO 3/25/05
~ Voucher: 185117
---S.) 185118 4/15/2005 005439 FREEBORN, SUE
Voucher: 185118
185119 4/15/2005 000923 FURNEY'S NURSERY INC
Voucher: 185119
185120 4/15/2005
Voucher:
185121 4/15/2005
Voucher:
185122 4/15/2005
Voucher:
000738 G I JOE'S FEDERAL WAY
185120
003118 GALLS INC
185121
002547 GRAINGER INC
185122
185123 4/15/2005
Voucher:
185124 4/15/2005
Voucher:
185125 4/15/2005
Voucher:
04/01/05
1-28886
1-28910
1-29186
104207
Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid
3/15/2005 AG#05-33 CULTURAL ARTS P 1,600.00
3/15/2005 AG#05-33 CULTURAL ARTS P 1,600.00
4/6/2005 AG#05-33 CULTURAL ARTS P 1,600.00
3/15/2005 P S- TOWI N G SERVI C ES- 1,364.00
3/28/2005 PKPL-ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGl
3/28/2005 MS F L T -F! RE. EXTI NG U I SH E R
3/28/2005 PKMT-ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGI
4/612005 CD-LASER PRINT COLOR-CO
3/31/2005 MSMD-3/05 COPIER RPR,MN-
5/112005 MSMD-COPIER LEASE SLM:S
3/25/2005 MC-PRO TEM 3/25/053.5 HOl
4/112005 MC-PRO TEM 1/5 HOURS
3/23/2005 PKM-PLANTS FOR CITY HALL
3/23/2005 PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE/3
4/512005 PKM-AZALEA FOR CEL.PK.
3/29/2005 PKM-RAINGEAR
5763775401019 4/1/2005
PS-CLOTHI NG/EOU I PMENT
753-265536-7 12/28/2004 NCHB-HOUSEHOLD SUPPUE
755-590086-4 3/28/2005 P KM-G R EAS E G U NIW RE N C H
RMA 112079947 3/18/2005 NCH B-R ETU RN 0 I G IT AL THE
BASKETBALL 4/212005 PRCS-BASKETBALL OFFICIAl
008778 GRANT, ROBERT
185123
003831 GSR POLYGRAPH SERVICES 05-011
185124
008134 GUARDIAN SECURITY
185125
805443
3/31/2005 PS-3/05 (6) POLYGRAPH EXA
3/15/2005 CHB-BUILDING MAINTENANC
Check Total
4,800.00
1,364.00
964.51
587.52
300.29
91,39
1,852.32
91.39
36.94
36.94
252.64
252.64
175.00
175,00
75,00
75.00
5,974.53
816.00
3.54
55.41
6,794.07
55.41
298.07
298.07
187.59
119.90
-52.01
110.00
255.48
110.00
750.00
750.00
195.84
195,84
Page: 9
apChkLst
04/15/2005 11 :15:20AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 10
Bank: key us bank
(Contínued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Invoice
185126 4/15/2005 000671 H D FOWLER COMPANY 11634271
Voucher: 185126 /1629509
185127 4115/2005 003841 HEAD-QUARTERS PTS 11444
Voucher: 185127 11415
185128 4/15/2005 001487 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPAi37810399
Voucher: 185128
185129 4/15/2005 008782 HICKEY, ¡SABEL
Voucher: 185129
\. 185130 4/15/2005 008771 HILEMAN, SCOTT
~ Voucher: 185130
-L. 185131 4/15/2005 002477 HOME DEPOT-DEPT 32-250079335393
<:) Voucher: 185131 5202412
202444
C13576A
HICKEY
BASKETBALL
185132 4/15/2005 005625 I/O SOLUTIONS LLC
Voucher: 185132
185133 4/15/2005 002898 IACP
Voucher: 185133
185134 4/15/2005 000016 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 1679346A
Voucher: 185134
185135 4/15/2005 000016 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 16487481
Voucher: 185135
185136 4/1512005 007300 INIA
Voucher: 185136
185137 4/15/2005 001133 IPMA-HR INT'L PUBLIC MGMT24101323
Voucher: 185137
185138 4/15/2005 003211 IRON MOUNTAIN/SAFESITE I~BD42475
Voucher: 185138
185139 4/15/2005 000718 JENNINGS EQUIPMENT INC RO18941
Voucher: 185139
1591017
Inv Date Description Amount Paid
3/29/2005 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 129.19
3/21/2005 PKM-IRRIGAT/ON SUPPLIESI/ 27.34
4/1/2005 PKM-PORTABLE TOILET SER 406.50
3/22/2005 PWSWR-PORTABlE TOILET; 74.50
3/31/2005 MSDP - RECORDER SERVER 8,376.51
4/4/2005 MS-2005 UTILITY TAX REFUN
4/2/2005 P R CS-BAS KET BAL L OFF I C IAI
3/18/2005 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIE
3/2/2005 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIE
3/7/2005 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIE
3/28/2005 MSHR-POLICE TESTING MAT
3/15/2005 PS-IACP RENEWAL - NORMA
3/25/2005 MSMD/RR-CANON IRC6800 C
4/5/2005
MSMD-3/05 COPIES MA/NT
LISLE REGISTR 3/24/2005 PS-INIA REGISTRATION
3/2912005 MSHR-MCDOUGLAL 05 DUES
3/31/2005 MSC-(O3/05) RECORDS STOR
3/29/2005 PKM-PARTS AND REPAIR SEi
Check Total
156.53
481.00
8,376.51
52.20
52.20
110.00
110.00
150,62
120.17
9,07
480.00
279,86
480.00
100.00
100,00
19,923.46
19,923.46
1,010.42
1,010.42
295,00
295.00
299.00
299.00
1 ,172.77
1,172.77
325.37
325.37
Page: 10
apChkLst
04/15/2005 11 : 15 :20AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 11
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
185140 4/15/2005
Voucher:
Invoice
004096 JOHNSON CHRISTIE ANDREV9016
185140 9022
8944
9018
9019
9024
9017
9025
9023
05-01-091-425
JONES
Inv Date Description
3/16/2005
3/28/2005
3/16/2005
3/16/2005
3/16/2005
3/28/2005
3/16/2005
3/28/2005
3/28/2005
3/10/2005
AG04-05-PSA LEGAL SVCS-
AG04-05-PSA LEGAL SVCS-
AG04-05-PSA LEGAL SVCS-
AG04-05-PSA LEGAL SVCS-
AG04-05-PSA LEGAL SVCS-
AG04-05-PSA LEGAL SVCS-
AG04-05-PSA LEGAL SVCS-
AG04-05-PSA LEGAL SVCS-
AG04-05-PSA LEGAL SVCS-
R!SK-05-0 1-091-425 311 0/05
3/15/2005 AG03-190:CITY CTR PLANNEI
MILEAGE REIMI 414/2005
4/4/2005
MS-2005 UTILITY TAX REFUN
PS-M!LEAGE REIMB TRNG 3/:
60207 12/31/04 12/13/2004 PS-PRE-EMPLOY - KIM, JOHI\
198594
2/25/2005 PRCS-OVERPAID LEAGUE FE
EMPLOY REIME 3/31/2005 PS-BACKGROUND CHECK All
1357602
8/4/2005
PWTR-2/05 sse SIGN/MRKN(
MSDP-(04/05) INTRGOV'T NE"
SWM~2005 REAL ESTATE TN
SWM-2005 REAL ESTATE T Ai
PWTR-(03/05) MATERIALS/SL
MIS-2003 NETWORK SVC KC!
2/27/2005 MSHR-EMPLOYMENT ADS 2/(
Amount Paid
6,003.87
2,937.50
1,230.15
1,020.40
912.31
463.00
448.00
263.00
154.00
100.00
8,378.50
38.39
252.79
400.00
25.00
520.94
8,372.77
800.00
1.31
0.99
153.29
957.44
1,112.00
Check Total
13,432.23
100.00
8,378.50
38.39
252.79
400.00
25.00
520.94
9,172.77
2.30
153,29
957.44
1,112.00
185141 4/15/2005 008793 JOHNSON, COREY
Vouche~ 185141
185142 4115/2005 007157 JON ES & STO KES ASSOC!A T(O024551
"-~ Voucher: 185142
. j 185143 4/15/2005 008783 JONES, LAURA
....c Voucher: 185143
-- 185144 4/15/2005 005056 JONES, WARREN CASEY
Voucher: 185144
185145 4/15/2005 007370 KATHLEEN P DECKER MD
Vouche~ 185145
185146 4115/2005 007956 KELLEIGH, DEAN
Voucher: 185146
185147 4/15/2005 003488 KELLY. STEPHEN
Voucher: 185147
185148 4/15/2005 000125 KING COUNTY FINANCE DrVI~1345662 3/16/2005
Voucher: 185148 1346226 3/21/2005
185149 4/15/2005 001898 KI N G CO U NTY FI NAN C E OF FI1221 03-9049-02 3/8/2005
Voucher: 185149 . 122103-9041-00 3/8/2005
185150 4/15/2005 005568 KING COUNTY FLEET ADM DI'202761 4/1/2005
Voucher: 185150 .
185151 4/15/2005 008449 KING COUNTY INFORMATIONIGN2003CB
Vouche~ 185151
185152 4/15/2005 000379 KING COUNTY JOURNAL
Voucher: 185152
Page: 11
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12
04/15/2005 11: 15: 20AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid Check Total
185153 4/15/2005 003137 KING COUNTY TREASURY 01\926500-0290-00 417/2005 PROPERTY TAX DBC;- 2,146.98
Voucher: 185153 1221 03-9146-04 4/7/2005 PROPERTY TAX DBC; 1ST H,l 1,210.42
112103-9051-08 4/7/2005 PROPERTY TAX DBC;- 305.45
926480-0160-01 417/2005 PROPERTY TAX DBC;- 203.91
0921 04-9303-07 417/2005 PROPERTY TAX DBC;- 106.24
2921 04-9011-06 4/7/2005 PROPERTY TAX DBC;- 41.89
292104-9043-08 4/7/2005 PROPERTY TAX DBC;- 41,89
797820-0162-03 417/2005 PROPERTY TAX DBC;- 41.89
092104-9250-00 4/7/2005 PROPERTY TAX DBC;- 41.89
0721 04-9181-06 4/7/2005 PROPERTY TAX DBC;- 41.89
\-1 092104-9198-05 4/7/2005 PROPERTY TAX DBC;- 41.89
092104-9026-03 4/7/2005 PROPERTY TAX DBC;- 41.89
-L 0321 04-9210-05 4/7/2005 PROPERTY TAX DBC;- 7.31
0321 04~9209-08 4/7/2005 PROPERTY TAX DBC;- 6.86
~ 122103-9049-02 4/7/2005 PROPERTY TAX DBC;- 1.16 4,281,56
185154 4/15/2005 000201 KINKO'S INC, ACCOUNT #020!515100075052 3/30/2005 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 548.35
Voucher: 185154 515100075043 3/29/2005 LAW-PRINTING SERVICES- 175.70
515100075049 3/30/2005 SWM-PRINTrNG SERVICES; J 129.74
515100075115 4/8/2005 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 106.62
515100075071 4/1/2005 PKRC$-PRINTING SERVICES 81.06
515100075121 4/11/2005 PWST -PRINTING SERVICES- 12.90
515100075064 3/31/2005 PS-PRINTfNG SERVICES 11.97
515100075045 3/29/2005 PWT-PRfNTING SERVICES- 8.53 1,074.87
185155 4/15/2005 006848 KOREAN CATHOLIC CHURCH6342 3/31/2005 DBC-RENTAL DEPOSIT REFU 98.78 98.78
Voucher: 185155
185156 4/15/2005 003399 KVASNYUK, NIKOLAY KVASNYUK 03/C 3/29/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE 210.00 210.00
Voucher: 185156
185157 4/15/2005 005837 LAIRD, DOUG ADV TRVL 3/8/2005 PS-PER DIEM ADV TRVL FIRE 190.00 190.00
Voucher: 185157
185158 4/15/2005 000022 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICO1-0056252 4/8/2005 PW-REFUND ROAD DAMAGE 223.00 223.00
Voucher: 185158
Page: 12
apChkLst
04/15/2005 11 : 15 :20AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 13
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Descriotion Amount Paid
185159 4/15/2005 000096 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRIC3607 3/9/2005 PKlPL: FEDERAL WAY COMM 500.00
Voucher: 185159 80406 3/14/2005 PKKLC (12/04-02/05) WATER/: 242.28
2906301 3/25/2005 PKM- (12/04-02/05) WTR/SWR 86.48
2592802 3/25/2005 PKM- (12/04-02/05) WTRISWR 80.65
1014202 3/25/2005 PKM- (12/04-02/05) WTR/SWR 69.99
2890801 3/14/2005 PKKLC (12/04-02105) WATER/: 19.78
99902 3/1412005 PKM- (12/04-02/05) WTRlSWR 15,68
3405101 3/14/2005 PWS-(12/04-02/05) WATER S\ 15.66
2883701 3/14/2005 PKKLC (12104-02105) WATER/: 14.48
2781501 3125/2005 PKM- (12104-02/05) WTR/SWR 14.48
185160 4/15/2005 007658 LAW OFFICE OF DIANE ZUMV112 3/15/2005 LAW-LARRY FLYNN APPEAL 450.00
Voucher: 185160
N 185161 4115/2005 005668 LAW OFFICES OF DESMOND MARCH 05 3/31/2005 AG01-62C:03/05 PUBLIC DEF[ 1,200.00
Vouche~ 185161
-6- 185162 4/15/2005 007050 LAW OFFICES OF HAL GEIER.41 3/31/2005 AG02-125B: 3/05-PUBUC DEF 19,920.00
Voucher: 185162
185163 4/15/2005 004386 LEIDER, DAVID REO 020556 4/5/2005 PKM-WORK JEANS/LEIDER 76.13
Voucher: 185163
185164 4115/2005 003157 LES SCHWAB TIRE CTRS OF '280487 3/1/2005 MSFLT-TIRE REPAIR 53.33
Voucher: 185164
185165 4115/2005 007985 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT JNC S123046 3123/2005 PRCS1KJP POOL VACUUM CL 108.75
Voucher: 185165
185166 4/15/2005 000630 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC 80767 3125/2005 NCH-COMPOST 268.30
Voucher: 185166 80670 3/25/2005 NCH-L&R COMPOST 43.00
80589 3122/2005 PWS-MEDIUM BARK- 18.39
185167 4/15/2005 005339 LOWE'S HIW INC 09819 4/1/2005 PKM-GROUND MT MAINT SUI 139.26
Voucher: 185167 13253 41112005 NCH-SUPPLIES - PARKING LC 35.25
27300 4/6/2005 PWS-REPAIR1MAINT SUPPllf 21.69
13977 3/29/2005 NCH-MAINTENANCE SUPPLIf 7.92
185168 4/15/2005 005265 LUSEBRINK, DEBBIE REO 020494 3/2412005 PRCS-FOOD ITEMS FOR VOl 64.56
Voucher: 185168
185169 4/15/2005 004094 MATHESON,DEREK 4/05 REIMBURS 4114/2005 CM-2 NIGHTS LODGING FOR 890.09
Voucher: 185169 REQ # 020524 3/28/2005 CM-CARDSTOCK FOR MAKIN 130.73
185170 4/15/2005 007439 MATTHEWS, ALFRED W 04-14257105-34 ~ 2/18/2005 LAW -04-14257/05-00343 H EAF 250.00
Voucher: 185170 04-17506 2/25/2005 LAW-DEE DAVISHEARNING I 100.00
Check Total
1,059.48
450.00
1,200.00
19,920.00
76.13
53.33
108.75
329.69
204.12
64.56
1,020.82
350.00
Page: 13
apChkLst
04/15f2005 11 : 15:20AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 14
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Descriotion Amount Paid
185171 4/15/2005 001234 MCCARTHY CAUSSEAUX ROl152 3/31/2005 AG96-148B:3/05 HEARING EX 508,00
Voucher: 185171
185172 4/15/2005 005407 MCCOLGAN, DEAN REO #020525 4/6/2005 CC-PARKING REIMB FOR MA 107.62
Voucher: 185172
185173 4115/2005 004182 MCDONOUGH & SONS JNC 139330 3/14/2005 AG05-02:03/05 STREET SWEJ: 7,862.04
Voucher: 185173
185174 4/15/2005 005176 MERINO STRAWE, BETTY STRAWE 03/291 3129/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE~ 135.00
Voucher: 185174
185175 4/15/2005 001793 MICROFLEX INC 00015589 414/2005 MSA-TAX AUDIT PROGRAM - 40.11
~ Voucher: 185175
, 185176 4115/2005 003170 MODERN SECURITY SYSTEM41693 3/25/2005 PKM-(04/05) ALARM MONITOr 34.82
L Voucher: 185176
--L 185177 4/15/2005 001902 MYERS MASTER LAWN CARE839 4/1/2005 PARKS/ LANDSCAPE MAINT; 2,406.66
Voucher: 185177
185178 4/15/2005 001052 NAPA AUTO PARTS 1506198 3/25/2005 PKM-GROUNDS MAINT SUPP 41.52
Voucher: 185178 1506229 3/25/2005 PKM-FLEET REPAIR & MAINT 38.03
185179 4/15/2005 006679 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF IWILCOX 05 DU¡ 4/11/2005 PS-NAFTO DUES - WILCOX 40.00
Voucher: 185179
185180 4/15/2005 004445 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0148580-1 N 3/21/2005 PS-NON-SPIKE FLARE 3e/CS 1,171.13
Voucher: 185180
185181 4/1512005 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE 183431 4/5/2005 SWM-R EP AI R/MAI NTE NAN CE 63.18
Voucher: 185181 183068 3/25/2005 SWM-R EP AI R/MAI NTE NANC E 54.39
183350 4/2/2005 PKM-FACILITIES REPAIR SUF 49.88
183184 3/29/2005 PWS-MAINT TOOL/SUPPLIES 48.26
183019 3/24/2005 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIES 41.55
183070 3/25/2005 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIES 40.69
183087 3/25/2005 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIES 35.48
183028 3/24/2005 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIES 25.55
182949 3/22/2005 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIES 24.82
183336 4/1/2005 PWS-MAI NT TOO USU P PU ES 16.46
183286 3/31/2005 PWS-MAINT TOOL/SUÞPLlES 13.10
183417 4/4/2005 PWS-MAINT TOOUSU PPLI ES 12.72
183233 3/30/2005 PKRCS-REPAIR SUPPLIES 12.71
183185 3/29/2005 PWS-MAI NT TOOUSU PP LIES 4.65
183147 3/28/2005 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIES 4.06
Check Total
508.00
107.62
7,862.04
135.00
40.11
34.82
2,406.66
79.55
40.00
1,171.13
447.50
Page: 14
apChkLst
04/15/2005 11: 15: 20AM
Final Chèck List
CITY. OF FEDERAL WAY
Pag~: 15
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Invoice
N
-C
'^'
185182 4/15/2005 008773 NEWLIN, E.G.
Vouche~ 185182
185183 4/15/2005 008765 NEWMAN, BERTHA
Voucher: 185183
185184 4/15/2005 004701 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 400102318-040
Vouche~ 185184
185185 4/15/2005 003529 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SEF1844-28
Voucher: 185185 . 1844-29
185186 4/15/2005 007444 ORCA PACIFIC INC 016309
Voucher: 185186 016166
185187 4/15/2005 000504 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER 19203
Voucher: 185187 316122
315791
316290
315658
316258
316082
316253
MARCH 2005
BASKETBALL
NEWMAN
185188 4/15/2005 005741 OUTCOMES BY LEW
Voucher: 185188
185189 4/15/2005 000112 PACIFIC COAST FORD INC FOCS115294
Voucher: 185189
185190 4/15/2005 000315 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE 1585393
Voucher: 185190 585394
585395
588156
587478
587477
588110
588112
588111
587479
Inv Date Descriøtiori Amount Paid
4/2/2005 PRCS-BASKETBALL OFF/CIA! 110.00
3/29/2005 MSF-2005 UTILITY TAX REFU 57.83
3/29/2005 MSTEL-( 3/05-4/05) CELLULAF 4,370,02
3/23/2005 PS-PERIODIC PHYSICAL EXA 374.00
3/25/2005 PS-PERIODIC EXAM- 187.00
12/31/2004 AG03-154A:SWIMMING POOL 152.09
3/2512005 AGO3-154A:SWIMMING POOL 58.72
3/7/2005 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIE 131.17
3/25/2005 PWST-MAINTENANCEIREPA¡ 87.99
3/14/2005 PWST -MAINTENANCE/REPAI 85.79
4/1/2005 PWST -MAl NTENAN C EIR EP AI 65.17
3/11/2005 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 34.22
3/31/2005 SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL'r 18.69
3/24/2005 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 9.76
3/31/2005 PKM-REPAI R/MAI NT SUPPLIE 6.50
3/31/2005 AG03-191:3/05 LOBBYIST SVC 3,991.72
3/28/2005 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 383.96
3/3/2005 PWST-TITLE REPORTS 734.40
2/28/2005 PWST-TJTlE REPORTS- 408.00
2/28/2005 PWST-TITLE REPORTS 408,00
3/18/2005 PWST-TJTLE REPORTS- 380.80
3/8/2005 PARCS-TITLE REPORTS 359.04
3/9/2005 PWST-TITLE REPORTS- 359.04
3/16/2005 PWST-TITLE REPORTS- 359.04
3/16/2005 PWST-TJTLE REPORTS- 359.04
3/16/2005 PWST-TITLE REPORTS- 359.04
3/8/2005 PKPL-TITLE REPORTS 926501 359.04
Check Total
110.00
57.83
4,370.02
561.00
210.81
439.29
3,991.72
383,96
4,085.44
Page: 15
apChkLst
04f15f2005 11:15:20AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 16
Bank: key us bank
(Contìnued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Invoice
185191 4/15/2005 004644 PACIFIC PLANTS INC
Voucher: 185191
42687
42692
42745
A 5693
185192 4/15/2005 004311 PACIFIC RIM RESOURCES JNCNNYD-2005-05
Vouche~ 185192
185193 4/15/2005 006440 PAPE MACINERY INC
Vouche~ 185193
\-. \ 185194 4/15/2005 000920 PAPER DIRECT INC
\ J Voucher: 185194
...c 185195 4/15/2005 004415 PARK, MICHAEL
~ Voucher: 185195
185196 A/15/2005 008222 PERTEET INC
Voucher: 185196
185197 A/1512005 001189 PETTY CASH - CM OFFICE REO 20575
Voucher: 185197
185198 4/15/2005 008676 PETTY CASH - MGMT SVC REO 020582
Vouche~ 185198
185199 4/15/2005 006241 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT REO 20574
Voucher: 185199
185200 4/15/2005 002024 PETTY CASH-WITNESS FEES MARCH 05
Voucher: 185200 MAR 05
185201 4/1512005 003520 PHUNG, NOVA C PHUNG
Voucher: 185201
185202 4/15/2005 000697 PIERCE COUNTY BUDGET & FR 0421303016
Voucher: 185202
185203 4/15/2005 005941 PIONEER MANUFACTURING CINV195821
Voucher: 185203
185204 4/15/2005 004680 PON, KEITH
Voucher: 185204
91626401
Iny Date Description Amount Paid
3123/2005 PARKING LOT/PLANTS INV#4 2,643,88
3/24/2005 PARKING lOT/ACER KARPICI 1,993.48
3/28/2005 PARKING LOT/ACER KARPICI 1,521,94
1/20/2005 RSK #05-03-210-392 TREE 357,72
3/29/2005 PWSWR-NW NATURAL YARC 1,500.00
3/15/2005 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT. SERV
94.66
3424707600010 3/11/2005 PKDBC-BROCH U RE PAPER
3424009500017 3/1/2005 PKDBC-BROCHURE PAPER S
REO # 020447 4/7/2005 CC-TAXI FARE FROM HOTEL
03/05 TUITION f 3/30/2005 PS-TUITION REIMBURSEMEt\
CJA/350 1/5/2005 MSHR-CJA/350 EDUC TUITIOI
CJA/360 1/5/2005 MSHR-CJA/360 EDUC TUJTIC
006218 POTELCO, INC, REO #020527 3/28/2005 CM-CONSTRUCTION COST T
185205
007322 POVERTY BAY COFFEE COM103/30/05
185206
25011.000
185205 4/15/2005
Voucher:
185206 4/15/2005
Voucher:
129,91
10,00
124,00
4/4/2005 AG05-11:S 336TH @ 1 ST WA ì
4/8/2005 MC-SUPPLIES FOR JURORS
4/8/2005 CDS - REPLENISH PETTY CA
4/8/2005 PS-LUNCHEON MEETING:WS
4/15/2005 MSF-MAR 05 WITNESS FUND
3/29/2005 MSF-(03105) WITNESS FUND
3/2912005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE~
4/7/2005 PKlADM-PROPERTY TAX-
3/18/2005 PKM-FIELD PAINT
3,268.80
Check Total
6,517.02
1,500,00
94,66
139.91
124.00
3,268.80
243.75
599.61
152.87
1,049.55
65.00
15.00
803.75
1,802.40
8,073.58
159.59
243.75
599.61
152.87
664.90
384.65
65.00
15.00
803.75
957,60
422.40
422.40
8,073.58
3/3012005 PS- CALEA TRAINING MEALS
159.59
Page: 16
apChkLst
04/15/2005 11 : 15 :20AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 17
Bank: key us bank
005583 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC029970
185207
008516 PRECISION EARTHWORKS INAG#04-174 #5
185208
000049 PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLF646116
185209 648203
649227
185210 4/15/2005 008107 PRINT SOLUTIONS & CONSUl6703
Vouche~ 185210
185211 4/15/2005 008767 PRO DESIGN LLC
Voucher: 185211
185212 4/15/2005 003829 PRO JET POWER WASHERS 100021758
\--\ Voucher: 185212
.£ 185213 4/15/2005 008795 PUBLIC RISK UNDERWRITER:4556
~ Voucher: 185213
185214 4/15/2005 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 156-140-2114
Voucher: 185214 156-140-2114
353-789-9647
727 -469-1 000
398-842-1008
311-112- 7001
345-200-2003
017-470-0088
002-141-1004
004-919-1 000
000602 PUGET SOUND INSTRUMENT421853
185215
008701 PUGET SOUND SERVICES 01240
185216
000533 PUGET SOUND SPECIALTIES 18509
185217
006860 QUIGG BROS INC
185218
Ch~ Date
185207 4/15/2005
Voucher:
185208 4/15/2005
Voucher:
185209 4/15/2005
Voucher:
185215 4/15/2005
Voucher:
185216 4/15/2005
Voucher:
185217 4/15/2005
Voucher:
185218 4/15/2005
Voucher:
(Continued)
Vendor
Invoice
Inv Date Description Amount Paid
3/20/2005 PKM-WELDtNG GAS 8.55
2/28/2005 AG04-174 :ARMSTR 0 NG PAR f 14,293.35
2/912005 AG#05-30 PHASE III (SR99) C~ 1,000.00
2/28/2005 AGO2-124C:LEGAL SVCS-288" 136.00
3/15/2005 AG02-124C:LEGAL SVCS-2BB' 60.00
3/21/2005 CM-NEWSLETTER TYPE SET 3,544.70
3/17/2005 PS-CUSTOM TAPESTRY THR 1,860.00
3/29/2005 PKM-NOZZLE WATER BROOr 70.67
1/25/2005 MS-FAITH PERFORMANCE B( 200.00
3122/2005 PKM--ELECTRCTY CHRGS 11,427.31
1/5/2005 PKM--ELECTRCTY CHRGS 10,998.50
3/22/2005 PKM-03/05-ELECTRCTY CHR( 7,109.34
3/21/2005 - P KDBC/KFT -(03/05) ELECTRC' 2,395.28
3/18/2005 PKM-03/05-ELECTRCTY CHR( 2,129.89
4/8/2005 PKDBC/KFT -(03/05)ELECTRC' 2,067.29
3/28/2005 PKCP-(03/05)ELECTRICITY CI 537.50
3/22/2005 PWT.(03/05) ELECTRICITY C¡' 170.93
3/21/2005 PKM-O2/05-ELECTRCTY CHR( 5.68
4/4/2005 SWM-(3/05)-ElECTRICITY CH 5.52
6/30/2004 MSDP/PW - MOBILE RAD!O R 87.04
3115/2005 AG#05-32 JANITORIAL SVC K 1,200.00
3/21/2005 PKM.3-WAY RYE SEED 2,241.28
3/14/2005 PWST -I N BOU N D-CO N CRETE 25.00
Check Total
8.55
14,293.35
1,196.00
3,544,70
1,860.00
70,67
200.00
36,847.24
87.04
1,200.00
2,241.28
25.00
5474
210571
Page: 17
apChkLst
04/15/2005 11: 15: 20AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 18
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor
185219 4/15/2005 000202 QWEST
Voucher: . 185219
Invoice
Iny Date
253-815-9920 11 4/4/2005
253~815-9924 3t 4/4/2005
253-529-9921 4 i 3/26/2005
253-942-7800 4E 3/25/2005
253-630-1529 2E 3/29/2005
MARCH 05 3/31/2005
ADV TRVL
3/22/2005
3/23/2005
3/16/2005
3/17/2005
3/22/2005
3/17/2005
3/31/2005
3/23/2005
4/112005
16399 3/25/2005
16405 3/30/2005
04/05 REJMBUR 4114/2005
0265152-IN
4926
3/10/2005
3/29/2005
3/24/2005
3/14/2005
Description Amount Paid
MSTE L -(03/05) PHON E/DA T A 47,27
MSTEL-(03/05) PHONE/DATA 44,77
MSTEL-(03/05) PHONE/DATA 44.74
MSTEL-(03/05) PHON E/DA T A 29.03
MSTEL-(03/05) PHONE/DATA 25.90
PS-MARCH 2005 UNIFORM CI 2,705.53
PS-1/05-03/05 USAGE 450,00
LAW-PER DIEM ADV TRVL W: 92.00
PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC 160.87
PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC 122.52
PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC 102.57
PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC 50.92
PS-CAMERA SUPPLIES/FILM 49.90
PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC 4.90
PKMT/STRIPING PARKING LC 291.49
MS-2005 UTILITY TAX REFUN 86.66
MSFL T-VEHICLE PAINTING A 1,333.89
MSFL T-VEHICLE PAINTING A 412,35
MIS-REIMB. CONFERENCE FI 2,030.52
PS-SYSTEM KEYS 49.44
PW-SAFETY EQUIPMENT/SUI 279.22
CM-ADVERTISING IN 2005 SE 115.00
AG#05-37 SW 356TH ST REG I 24,419,07
RS K # 05-03-21 0-393; FE N C E 1,662.46
Check Total
191.71
2,705.53
450.00
92.00
491.68
291.49
86.66
1)46.24
2,030.52
49.44
279.22
115.00
24,419.07
1,662.46
185220 4/15/2005 006873 REGENCY CLEANERS
Voucher: 185220
185221 4/15/2005 006165 RENTON FISH & GAME CLUB 1/05-3/05 USAG 417/2005
Voucher: 185221
L \ 185222 4/15/2005 004923 RICHARDSON, PATRI.CIA
\--; Voucher: 185222
~ 185223 4/15/2005 004317 R (T2 CAM ERA ON E HOU R PH' 1026037850
"çp Voucher: 185223 1026034990
1026035230
1026037480
1026035240
1026041480
185224 4/15/2005 003176 ROADRUNNER STRIPING INC3751
Voucher: 185224
185225 4/1512005 008781 RORTVEDT, EDWIN & THELM.RORTVEDT
Voucher: 185225
185226 4/15/2005 008745 RS COLOR & DESIGN INC
Voucher: 185226
185227 4/15/2005 002807 SADRI, MEHDI
Voucher: 185227
185228 4/15/2005 008780 SAFETY VISION
Voucher: 185228
185229 4/15/2005 001048 SANDERSON SAFETY SUPPL'1028942-01
Voucher: 185229 .
185230 4/15/2005 003012 SEATTLE'S CONVENTION &V19509
Voucher: 185230
185231 4/15/2005 008743 SEAWEST CONSTRUCTION AG#05-037 #1 4/8/2005
Voucher: 185231
185232 4/15/2005 001213 SECOMA FENCE INC
Voucher: 185232
Page: 18
apChkLst
04/15/2005 11 : 15: 20AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 19
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
TUPOU 3/8/05 3/8/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERV CE~
TUPOU 03/29/0: 3/29/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE~
TUPOU 03/23/0t 3/23/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE~
TUPOU 03/31/0t 3/31/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE~
185234 4/15/2005 008595 SENIOR SOFTBAll WORLD CCITY-BlD 10/21/2004 CM-BID FEE FOR 2006 SSWC
Voucher: 185234
185235 4/15/2005 001988 SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY
Voucher: 185235
Check #
Date
Vendor
185233 4/15/2005 005539 SEMISI-TUPOU, VAIVAO
Voucher: 185233
185236 4/15/2005 008770 SHAVER, RICKY
Voucher: 185236
185237 4/15/2005 003873 SIGN-A-RAMA
Voucher:, 185237
N 185238 4/15/2005 008796 SIMONSON, TED H.
Voucher: 185238
:; 185239 4/15/2005 008608 SMITH ALLING LANE PS
Voucher .185239
185240 4/15/2005 001045 SOB TECHNOLOGIES
Voucher: 185240
185241 4/15/2005 004963 SOUND PUBLJSHING INC
Voucher: 185241
185242 4/15/2005 008723 SO UTH-N-ER ECTOR S, lL C
Voucher: 185242
185243 4/15/2005 001885 SPARKS CAR CARE
Voucher: 185243
Invoice
Inv Date Descriþtion
Amount Paid
78.75
52.50
43.75
35.00
2,500.00
19.03
19.03
19.03
90.00
887.81
544.00
3,755.00
1,008,00
200.48
200.48
. 200.48
79,114.14
331.43
286.33
272.84
149.93
148,59
91.60
54.40
29.75
27,20
21.76
Check Total
210.00
2,500,00
57.09
90.00
887.81
544.00
3,755.00
1,008.00
601.44
79,114.14
1,413.83
330/8168
323-1303
316/2982
03-49448
3/30/2005 PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES ACe
3123/2005 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES Ace
3/16/2005 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES Ace
3/25/2005 PS-TRAFFIC SCHOOL REFUI\
8065 3/31/2005 COP-WHITE CORO NOTICE B
05-01-331-424 3/29/2005 RISK-05-01-331-424 1/20105 &
24960 3/25/2005 AG#05-26 FEDERAL LOBBYIS
5273 3/25/2005 MSHR-FIRST AID CLASS
017894 3/5/2005 MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT
017938 3/12/2005 MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT
017990 3/24/2005 MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT
AG#05-40 #1 4/11/2005 AG#05-40 EVIDENCE BUILDII\
15332 3/29/2005 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT
15330 3/29/2005 PS-AG03-15 7: VE HI C L ES M NT
15299 3/24/2005 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT
15339 3/30/2005 PS-AG 03-157: VE H I C LES M NT
15297 3/23/2005 PS-AG03-157:VEHJCLES MNT
15313 3125/2005 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT
15344 3/30/2005 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT
15307 3/25/2005 MSFTL-AG03-157 VHCS MNT
15308 3/25/2005 MSFTL-AG03-157 VHCS MNT
15316 3/26/2005 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT
Page: 19
apChkLst
04/15/2005 11 :15:20AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 20
Bank: key us bank
(Contìnued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Invoice
185244 4/15/2005 001618 SPEEDY AUTO & WINDOW G19172-0058974
Voucher: 185244
185245 4/15/2005 003600 SPILLMAN TECHNOLOGIES 1t-13607
Voucher: 185245
185246 4/15/2005 002548 SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL
Voucher: 185246
L \ 185247 4/15/2005 008065 SPRAGUE, JUANITA L
\ r Voucher: 185247
V\ 185248 4115/2005 008561 STATE CONSTRUCTION,INC AG#04-189 #3
~ Voucher: 185248
185249 4/15/2005 004864 STOP STICK
Voucher: 185249
185250 4/15/2005 000341 SUNRISE SELF STORAGE 278212
Voucher: 185250
185251 4/15/2005 007710 SUPERIOR LINEN SERVICE
Voucher: . 185251
185252 4/15/2005 002521 SUPERlON PLASTICS INC
Voucher: 185252
185253 4/15/2005 007990 SYMBOlARTS LLC
Voucher: 185253
185254 4/15/2005 008484 TACOMACOMMUNITY HOUSE5031 004
Vouche~ 185254 5021004
185255 4/1512005 000588 TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES 100048250
Vouche~ 185255 100255396
185256 4/15/2005 007886 TAYLOR. RICHARD C TAYLOR
Voucher: 185256
185257 4/15/2005 003085 TECHNOLOGY \NTEGRAT\ON2278591
Voucher: 185257
185258 4/1512005 008776 THOMPSON, JOE
Voucher: 185258
391314
391455
391369
391369
252486 CR
264659 CR
SPRAGUE
21846
342098
346121
05F1181
00421541-IN
BASKETBALL
Inv Date Description Amount Paid
1/31/2005 PS-WINDSHIElD REPAIR 215.04
11/22/2004 MS/PS YEARLY MAINTANCE' 18,025,00
3/31/2005 PKDBC-PEST CONTROL SVC 92.48
31712005 PKM-ST lK PEST CONTROL ~ 89.22
3/7/2005 PKRLS-PEST CONTROL SVC: 52.22
3/29/2005 PKRLS-PEST CONTROL SVC: 52.22
4/5/2005 PKRLS-CREDIT DUPLICATE F -89.22
4/5/2005 PKRlS-CREDIT DUPLICATE F -89.22
4/4/2005 MS-2005 UTILITY TAX REF UN 127.04
3/4/2005 AGO4-189'.NEW CH-N PRKG L 26,975.81
3/24/2005 PS-4/STOP STICKS 1,713.43
1/11/2005 PS-05/05 STRG RENTAL FEE 175.00
3/22/2005 PRCS-FLOOR MAT RENTAL ~ 46.14
4/5/2005 PRCS-FLOOR MAT RENTAL ~ 46.14
3/1012005 SWM-REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 75.78
2/23/2005 PS-FREIGHT CHARGES 7.50
3/31/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE~ 190.00
2/28/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICEf 160.00
3/28/2005 PKDBC/KFT-PUBlIC UTILITIE 356.67
3/3/2005 PKF -12/04-03/031O5-W ATE R P 227.25
3/31/2005 MSF-2005 UTILITY TAX REFU 89,84
4n /2005 MS/EOC GRANT FFY04 - 2,599.23
4/2/2005 PRCS-BASKETBALL OFFICIAl 130.00
Check Total
215.04
18,025.00
107.70 .
127,04
26,975.81
1,713.43
175.00
92.28
75.78
7.50
350,00
583.92
89,84
2,599.23
130.00
Page: 20
apChkLst Fil1alCheck List Page: 21
0411512005 11: 15 :20AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
185259 4/15/2005 008774 THOMPSON, SUZANNE L BASKETBALL 4/212005 PRCS-BASKETBALL OFF'ICIAI 90.00 90.00
Voucher: 185259
185260 4/15/2005 008079 THREE CHICKS CATERING CC5718 4/29/2005 CDHS VOL DINNER CATERIN 3,473.44 3,4 73.44
Voucher: 185260
185261 4/15/2005 001424 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 1175950 4/1/2005 AG03-199:NEW CH ELEVATO 149.04 149.04
Voucher: 185261
185262 4/15/2005 008769 TIBBJLS, DEBBRA 03-49295 3/25/2005 PS-TRAFFIC SCHOOL REFU!\ 90.00 90.00
Voucher: 185262
185263 4/15/2005 001436 TREE RECYCLERS 50406 4/6/2005 PKM-REMOVAL OF DEAD/DYI 391.68 391,68
Voucher: 185263
~ 185264 4/15/2005 008074 TRUGREEN LANDCARE LLC 3234233728 3/31/2005 CHB/LANDSCAPE MONTH OF 382.98 382.98
Voucher: 185264
\J) 185265 4/15/2005 001715 TRUGREEN-CHEM LAWN 564917 3/2912005 PKCP-PESTICJDE SVCS 707.20
""'- Voucher: 185265 3234233727 3/31/2005 PKM-FAC:PEST!CIDE SVCS F 134.91 842.11
185266 4/15/2005 005253 US BANCORP MAR2005 4/5/2005 MARCH 2005 VISA CHARGES 6,160.14
Voucher: 185266 FEB 05 ADDTL f 3/4/2005 MSHR-RUNNERS WORLD RE 21.94 6,182.08
185267 4/15/2005 005254 U S BANCORP MAR2005 4/5/2005 MARCH VISA CHARGES 7.736.98 7,736.98
Voucher: 185267
185268 4/15/2005 008772 UNDERWOOD, RICKY BASKETBALL 4/212005 P R C S-BAS KETBAL L 0 FF IC IAI 90.00 90.00
Voucher: 185268
185269 4/15/2005 002426 UNITED GROCERS CASH & c'46249 3124/2005 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLJE.s 74.49
Voucher: 185269 45632 3/21/2005 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLlE.s 54.58
47393 3/31/2005 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLJE.s 32.01
39599 2114/2005 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLlE.s 26,36 187.44
185270 4/15/2005 007357 UNITED REPROGRAPHICS 0075893-IN 3/15/2005 CM-PRINTING OF ARCHITEC' 35.91
Voucher: 185270 0075868-JN 3/16/2005 CM-PRINT!NG OF ARCHITEC' 24.45
0071859-1 N 3/8/2005 CM-PRINTING OF ARCH/TEG" 22.23 82.59
185271 4115/2005 004470 US HEAL THWORKS MED GRCO081417-WA 3/11/2005 MSHR-DOT EXAM - PEDERSC 55.00 55.00
Voucher: 185271
185272 4/15/2005 003563 VAL LEY. COM M U N J CAT 10 N S (0003672 3/25/2005 PS- 01 05 WSP ACCESS FEE 2,125.55
Voucher: 185272 0003730 3/25/2005 PS-(03/05)EMER DISPATCH S 840.00
0003678 3/25/2005 PS-(02/05) EMERG DISPATCI- 123.76 3,089.31
185273 4/15/2005 002517 VAN ORSOW, ROB ADV TRVL 3/25/2005 PWRS-ADV TRVL WSRA REC 167.88 167.88
Voucher: 185273
Page: 21
apChkLst
04/15/2005 11 : 15: 20AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 22
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
185274 4/15/2005 000618 VERDICON SO02507435.001 3/14/2005 PKM- FETILIZER 301.35 301.35
Voucher: 185274
185275 4/15/2005 005704 VE R TI CAL TRANS PO RT A Tl 0 f', DVT05642X405 3/21/2005 AGOO-171 : 4/05-KLC C EL VTR ~ 167,65 167.65
Voucher: 185275
185276 4/15/2005 000294 VILMA SIGNS 327 3/24/2005 CHPO~SIGNSNEHICLE DECA 108.80 1 08,80
Voucher: 185276
185277 4/15/2005 002820 VIRGINIA MASON SOUTH L91359 4/1/2005 MSHR-HEP B SHOT 50,00
Voucher: 185277 L91359 4/6/2005 MSHR~HEP B SHOT 50.00 100.00
185278 4/15/2005 004339 WA STATE DEPT OF PERSON01157-E 3/3/2005 AG#02-055 (5) RETREAT FAC 700.00 700.00
H Voucher: 185278
. 185279 4/15/2005 000340 WA STATE INFORMATION SEI2005030214 4/4/2005 MSTEL-(03/05) SCAN SERVIC 1,302.23 1,302.23
~\ Voucher: 185279
~ 185280 4/15/2005 003022 WA STATE NATURAL RESOUIFPAPPLICATIOI 4/14/2005 PKlPL: COMMUNITY CENTER 500.00 500.00
Voucher: 185280
185281 4/15/2005 000851 WA STATE PATROL 00024918 3/15/2005 MSDP-(03/05) ACCESS USER 2,850,00
Voucher: 185281 105018007 4/6/2005 MSHR~(03/05) BCKGRND CHE 60.00 2,910.00
185282 4/15/2005 001162 WA STATE RECYCLING 28-0RSOW REt 3/24/2005 PWSWR-MEMBERSHIP RENE 250.00 250.00
Voucher: 185282
185283 4/15/2005 006853 WAHl, PRAN WAHI04/05/05 4/5/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE~ 110.00
Voucher: 185283 WAHI03/29/05 3/29/2005 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE~ 100.00 210,00
185284 4/15/2005 002848 WAS H ¡ N GTON FORESTRY CC 3453 3/28/2005 COMM.CENTERITIMBER INVE 997.80 997.80
Voucher: 185284
185285 4/15/2005 000783 WASTE MANAGEMENT 0057891-1 055-7 4/1/2005 PWSWR-LiTTER DISPOSAL 3 337.99 337.99
Voucher: 185285
185286 4/15/2005 007876 WELLS, GREGORY AOV TRVL 3/2/2005 PS-PER DIEM ADV TRVL FIRE 190.00 190.00
Voucher: 185286
185287 4/15/2005 001241 WEST COAST AWARDS 41702 3/22/2005 PKM-STAFF UNIFORMS 254,36 254.36
Voucher: 185287
185288 4/15/2005 000197 WEST COAST WIRE ROPE 438741 3/11/2005 PKM-PVC CABLE 29,92 29.92
Voucher: 185288
185289 4/15/2005 000173 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 808699100 4/14/2005 MSDP-WESTLAW USAGE 3/0: 1,217.27 1,217.27
Voucher: 185289
185290 4/15/2005 000541 WESTERN EO U I PM ENT D!STF413028 3/30/2005 PKM-CLOSED TINES (96) 521.20
Voucher: 185290 398002 10/21/2004 NCHB-CASTORS AND BUSHII -171.84 349.36
Page: 22
apChkLst
04/15f2005 11 : 15 :20AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 23
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice
185291 4/15/2005 005016 WESTER N METAL ARTS COM 05-625
Vouche~ 185291
185292 4/15/2005 001427 WESTERN POWER & EQUIPMJ89426
Voucher: 185292 J89331
185293 4/15/2005 002204 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY 740922 RI
Voucher: 185293
185294 4/15/2005 005680 WILD WEST INTERNATIONAL 3830
Vouche~ 185294
185295 4/15/2005 008068 WILKERSON, SHIRLEY S
Voucher: 185295
185296 4115/2005 000660 WOODWORTH & COMPANYlr150464
Voucher: 185296 150463
150614
150059
005697 WORK-SPORTS & OUTDOOR~7209
185297
WILKERSON
N
'S\ 185297 4115/2005
W Voucher:
Jnv Date Description
3/31/2005 PKCS-GUSTOM ARTIST PLAC
Amount Paid
216.57
Check Total
216.57
89.74
306.44
30.46
67.31
634.80
83.90
874,617.63
3/30/2005 PWS-SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPM 46.68
3/28/2005 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 43.06
3/19/2005 PWS-MAINTENANCE SUPPLII 306.44
3/31/2005 PS~FIRING RANGE FEE SVC~ 30.46
3/29/2005 MSF-2005 UTILITY TAX REFU 67,31
3/29/2005 SWM-GENERAL CONTRACTC 218.95
3/29/2005 PWST --G EN ERAL C ONTRACl 165.45
3/31/2005 SWM-GENERAL CONTRACTC 126.81
3/15/2005 SWM-GENERAL CONTRACTC 123.59
4/312005 PKM-WORK JEANS/OSBORN 83.90
Sub total for us bank:
Page: 23
apChkLst
04/15/2005 11 : 15: 20AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 24
277 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks:
874,617.63
'\--1
\.¡~
~
-L
Page: 24
apChkLst
^ 04/19/2005 3:33:51PM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 1
Bank: key us bank
Check #
Date
185298 4/19/2005
Voucher:
185299 4/19/2005
Voucher:
185300 4/19/2005
Voucher:
185301 4/19/2005
youcher:
185302'" 4/19/2005
Voucher:
't;!
'-'"
Vendor
Invoice
Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
4/14/2005 CDB-10TR 2005 ~EMIT PERIV 33,847.29 33,847,29
4/18/2005 MSF-3/05 SCHL IMPACT FEE~ 79.441,00 79,441.00
2/8/2005 PS-PER DIEM ADV TRVL WSl 88.00 88.00
4/19/2005 MARCH 2005 B&O TAX 5,153.70 5,153.70
4/19/2005 1 ST aT 05 LEASEHOLD EXCI: 651.04 651,04
Sub total for us bank: 119,181.03 /'
000285 FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPARTi1ST QTR 05
185298
001893 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTSIF-MAR 2005
185299
005497 SKINNER, BILL
185300
000061 WA STATE REVENUE DEPAR"601-223-538
185301
002649 WA STATE REVENUE DEPT:M1STOTR2005
185302
ADV TRVL
Page: 1
apChkLst
04/19/2005 3:33.:51PM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 2
5 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks:
119,181.03
\--)
\jì
ç'-
Page: 2
MEETING DATE:
May 17,2005
ITEM# '~(C)
"""-"-------""""""",--------""",,,,,,---
-----"""",m,,---------------- """""",___--m--___"""mmmm"--"--____""m",,,,,,------------------""""""""-"---------------",,,,,mm,,-------------------" """"""""-"",------------------------""""",,, """,-""---------------------"""""",, """---------______m_m
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
March 2005 Monthly Financial Report
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMP ACT:
ø CONSENT
D RESOLUTION
D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
D ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
---------------------------
__m--__"__--------__--__m""""""",m"..""""",",,----, -""---"----------__--___m____--_--
A TT ACHMENTS: March 2005 Monthly Financial Report
mm",-,,-------------------"'-"'"
----------------""""""",m"",
____m_--m_m_____"""""""""",mmmm",,----------------------------
""""""m""",m""m"m""-",,
SUMMARY /BACK GROUND:
"---------------____""m"",,,
-"-"""""""m"_____----______m--"_""m,,m,,m""----_____m_m
""""""m"""m,,------------------------
""""""""""-"_,_m_____-------------------------
""",m",m,,"-,,-_---------------- -----------'-'--"""""""
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Was reviewed at the Finance, Economic Development and
Regional Affairs Committee at their April 26th meeting.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move for the approval of the March 2005 Monthly Financial Report."
~~~~~~- -- ~--
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
D APPROVED
D DENIED
D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1ST d"
rea mg
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/1012001
CITY OF .,;, ~
Federa I Way
MEMORANDUM
Date:
April 26, 2005
To:
Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Connnittee
Via:
From:
David Moseley, City Manager
Tho Kraus, Finance Manager
Subject:
March 2005 Monthly Financial Report
This is the new format of the monthly financial report and is intended to provide an overview of financial activity that has
taken place in the reporting period and continues to focus mainly on activity incurred in the operating funds. One of the
major changes in this report is the distinction between general and street fund versus designated operating funds. The
designated operating funds include Arterial Street Overlay, Utility Tax, Solid Waste & Recycling, Hotel/Motel Lodging
Tax, Paths & Trails, Debt Service, Surface Water Management, and Dumas Bay CentrelKnutzen Family Theatre
Operations. A summary of sources and uses schedule (including both ongoing and one-time sources and uses), is prepared
for each category (general/street fund versus designated operating funds) and focuses on current and prior year's activity
and provides variances compared to the year-to-date budget estimate. The detailed revenue and expenditure specific
tables compare only current year versus prior year's actual activity and does not compare with year-to-date budget
estimates. Another change in the report is in the calculation of year-to-date budget estimates. In previous reports, the
budget estimates were based on a five year trend, whereas in the new report format, the estimate is based primarily on just
the prior year's activity. The reasoning for the change from five year to one year trend is due to the fact that the current
year is quite different that three or five years ago, and is more in line with 2004 budget and operations. We believe the
new report will provide a clearer picture of general umeserved funds versus those that are restricted as in the designated
operating funds. We will continue to enhance the report and provide additional meaningful information as we progress in
further developing this report.
Action Requested:
Accept the March 2005 Monthly Financial Report and forward to the 17th Council meeting for full Council approval.
Committee Chair
ApPROVAL OF COMMITTEE ACTION:
#!~
K:\FIN\MFR \M FRFED RACCYR. DOC
HI
~
CITY Of ~,
Federal Way
March 2005 Monthly Financial Report
GENERAL & STREET FUND OPERATIONS
The overall operating of the combined General and Street Fund showed a positive result of $652k through March. Overall
revenue total $7.03M and is $285K or 4% above budget, primarily attributable to the exceptional building pennit activities and
a positive sales tax infused by new constructions. Both pennit and construction sales taxes are cyclical in nature and very
sensitive to changing economy and should not be overly relied upon for long term purposes. Year to date expenditures total
$7.99M and is $368K or 4% below budget. The favorable expenditure comparison is primarily due the timing difference in
when payments are made.
~._. 2004 2005 Variance
3ENERAL&STREET FUND ~---,-
Annual Annual YTO Annual YTO YTO favorable ¡Unfavorable)
Summary of Sources &,U,S9a Budget Actual Actual Budget Budget March po liars ($) Percent ('Yo)
Beginning fund Balance $ a,109,614 $ 8.109,614 $ 8,109.614 $ 3,125,617 $ 2,934,917 $ 2,934,917 $ 0.0%
OPERATING REVENUES
Property Taxes 8.107,771 8,121,088 334,233 8,584,024 314,382 314.382 0.0%
Sales Tax 10,835,153 10,546,218 2,749,853 10.638,000 2,776.398 2,812,284 35.886 1.3%
Criminal Justice Sales Tax 1,714,051 1,648,046 404.801 1.681.000 412,896 432.987 20.092 4.9%
Inter90vernmental 2,233,623 2,231,610 551.680 2,362,000 583,914 543.408 (40,506) -6,9%
Lea$ehold Tax 2.500 19,292 169 2,500 22 151 129 591,5%
Gambling Taxes 1.850,000 1,444,132 341,571 1,330,000 314,576 383,285 68,709 21.8%
ourt Revenue 1.275.975 1,242,798 315,115 1,291,000 327,338 296,784 (30,553) -9.3%
Building PermitslFees-CD 1,194,009 1,658,586 373,344 1,442,400 324,681 540.817 216,136 66,6%
ROW Permitslfeas-PW 377,296 339,368 84,739 365,000 91,140 72,012 (19,126) -21.0%
Licenses 142.100 177,445 25,077 208,517 29,466 60,722 31,254 106,1%
Franchise fees 853,062 700.714 143,723 663,000 135,988 178,910 42,922 31.6%
Passport Agency Fees 57.910 20,700 85,086 30.414 16,105 (14,309) -47.0%
Recreation Fees 934,950 830,603 243.984 872,335 258,242 250,605 (5,437) -2,1%
Public Safety 712,304 936,429 327,799 1.051,417 368,051 333,934 (34,117) -9,3%
AdminlCash Management fees 542,000 541,495 135,374 552.000 138,000 138,000 0 0,0%
Interest Eamings 288,170 111.004 35,627 122,000 39,156 46.101 6,945 17,7%
Mise/Other 108,849 229,619 60,369 174,700 45,930 52,446 6,515 14.2%
On In:
Utility Tax.Celebration Pari< 231,843 231,843 231,843 238,798 238,798 238.798 - 0,0%
Utility Tax-Kenneth Jone$ Pool 309,000 283,910 78,521 314,000 29.244 29,244 - 0.0%
Utility Tax-Arts CommlParks Programs 93,750 - nla
Utility Tax-Police Position$ 625,000 - - nla
Utility Tax-Street Bond Projects 182,852 182,853 192,000 192.000 192,000 0.0%
Utility Tax-New Street Li9hts 93,900 93.900 93,900 0,0%
Òtal OperatIng Revenues 31,6~5,608 31,534.959 6,458,(¡g2 32,982,427 6,742,536 7,027,075 264,63~ 4,2'A
OPERATiNG EXPENDITURES
ity Council 305,038 308.685 166,411 348,959 189,349 168,506 22,844 12,1%
ity Manager 737.905 677.036 174,929 558,153 143,896 155,560 (11,884) -83%
Municipal Court-Operations 1,461,066 1,404.903 335,636 1,417,022 338,531 324.717 13,814 4.1%
Economic Development 166,848 135.411 31,453 250.573 58,203 50.622 7,581 13,0%
Management Services 2,043,473 2.014.104 457.265 1,862,441 422,833 508,434 (65,601) ,20,2%
CivillCriminal Legal Services 1,427.447 1,219.618 3(J7.477 1,398.522 352.580 289,762 62,818 17.8%
ammo Development Svcs 3.720,212 3,365.496 888.998 3,554,737 917,861 733,363 184,498 20.1%
ail ServiCeS 1.384.080 1,211,530 198,283 1,442.060 233,632 121,854 111,778 47.8%
Police Services 16,075,115 18,042.043 4,108,625 15,993,421 4,096,172 4.127.777 (31,804) -0.8%
Parks and Recreation 4,042.762 3,9<2,250 825,922 3,933.439 628.278 805,393 22,885 2.8%
Public Works 4,046.049 3,687,934 740,225 3,689,837 780,750 710,251 70.498 9.0%
lIy-Wide PaylBeneflts & IS Charges 86,000 77 . 996 (179,239) - nla
ota O~rating ExpendItures 35,495,974 34,065.006 6,213,224 34,467,925 8,361.888 7,994,238 ..387;648 4.4%
Operating Revenues over/(under)
Operating expendItures (3.600,466) (2,530,048) (1,754,702) (1.485.496) (1,619.360) (967,163) 652,187 -40.3'f,
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
One-Time Transfers In 7,361 7.361 4,591 25.000 25,000 25,000 . 0.0%
Grants 336,526 246.360 55,365 18.354 31.705 31,705 . 0.0%
Total Other FInancing Sources 343,687 253,720 59,956 43,354 56,705 56.705 - 0.0'f,
:>THER FINANCING USES
City Manager Contingency 156,636 - 1.214,043 - nla
One-Time Transfers to CIP 2,898,370 2.896.370 2,898,370 - nla
Other nla
Total Other FinancIng Uses 3,055,206 2,898,370 2,698.370 1,214,043 - nl.
otal Endln" Fund Balance 1,597,629 $ 2.934.917 $ 3,516,498 $ 469,430 $ $ 2,024.459 $ (63,109) nl8
+-13
Sales Tax
Sales tax received through March of $2.812M is $36K or
1.3% above the budget and $62K or 2.3% over the same
period in 2004. As shown in the detail by SIC code table
below, new construction along increased by $103k, which
is the primary contributing factor of the positive bottom
line. In addition, the major projects that contributed to this
increase are mainly public projects. For these reasons, the
sales tax improvement is temporary in nature, different
than the broad based economic improvement which would
be more sustainable.
The preliminary report for April shows a total of $752K
which exceeds April 2004's activity by $44K or 6%. We
believe governmental projects again are the key
contributor of the increase.
LOCAl. RETAIL SALES TAX REVENUES
Year-fo-datethru March
Month 2004 2005 $ Var %Var
Jan $ 852.300 $ 862.219 $ 9.919 1.2%
Feb 1,117,608 1.155,866 ,...' 38,258 ~~
~~ 779,947 794, 1.~7 14.250 1.8%
~! 707,611 - - -
.,-
May 875,451 - - -
Jun 831.979 - - -
808,352 "" -.
Jul - - -
..', _.-,
AU9 983,203 .. ..-
.. _.'
Sep 938,548 - -
Oct 862,312 - .. -
--'
Nov .!J.37.836 - - -
.- ---
Dee 841,153- - - -
r--vro-Ti;fal $ 2,749,855 $ 2,812,282~$ 62,427 2.3%
Sales Tax bv SiC Code
COMPARISONOF,SALES TAX COLLECTIONS BY SIC GROUP
, '" Xear-to-date thruMarch
(;öl'fìþönent 2004 2005 Change from 2004
BrauD '""," Aétual Actual $ %
Retail Trade $ 1.875,924 $ 1.903.640 $ 27,716 1.5%
Services 334.947 291,004 (43.943) -13.1%
ConstrueVContract 187,199 289,992 10~.793 54.9%
Wholesaling 117,384 126.849 9,465 8.1%
_~ansp/Comm/Utilio/. 104,327 .!.09,393 5,06.6 4.9%
Manufacturing 33,845 30,655 (3,190) -9.4%
Government 11.363 1?,585 1,222 10.8%
Fin/Ins/Real Estate 64,399 3~,~11 (33.788) -52.5%
-,-.- - ..... ---:~
Other 20,467 17.553 (2.914) -14.2%
Total $ 2,749,855 $ 2,812,282 $ 62,427 2.3%
Retail sales continue to remain the largest source of sales
tax revenue, accounting for 68% of all sales tax
collections. Year-to-date retail sales tax collection is $28K
or 2% above year~to-date 2004.
Services industry accounts for 10% of the total sales tax
collections. On year-to-date basis, services sales tax is
down $44K or 14% compared to 2004.
Construction and contracting activity, which accounts for
10% of sales tax collections, is up $103K or 55% from
2004's activity.
t-!y
Finance/insurance/real estate activity accounts for I % of
sales tax collections is down $34K or 53% compared to
2004.
Sales Tax bv Actìvìtv
SALES TAX COMPARISON by AREA
Y]'D7i/:lŒugh March
Chg from 2004
Group 2004 2005 $ %
Total Sales Tax $2,749,855 $2,812,282 $62,427 2.3%
S 348thRetail BloCk $372,335 $353,384 1$18,951 .5.1%
% chg from prov yr 0.1% -5.1% na na
Percentage of total 13.5% 12.6% -1.0% -7.2%
The Commons 311,696 319,741 8,045 2.6%
% chg from prev yr 16.6% 2.6% na na
Percentage of totat 11.3% 11.4% 0.0% 0.3%
Major Auto Sales 110,091 93,914 (16,1771 -14.7%
% chg from prev yr 17.9% -14.7% na nil
Percentage of totat 4.0% 3.3% .0.7% -16.6%
S 312th to S 316th 159,431 161,935 2,504 1.6%
% chg from prov yr 8.6% 1.6% na na
Percentage of total !;;.8% 5.8% 0.0% -0.7%
Pavilion Center 144,557 143,251 (1,306 -0.9%
% chg from prevx!. 4.8% -0.9% na na
Percentage of total 5.3% 5.1% -0.2% -3.1%
The City's largest retail center, South 348th, which
generates 13% of the City's sales tax experienced a
decrease of $19K or 5% compared to the year 2004. The
Commons is showing an increase of $8K or 3% compared
to year 2004 activity. Major Auto Sales collections total
$94K and is $17K or 15% below 2004. S 312th to S316th
is up $3K or 2% from the prior year. Pavilion Center tax
collections are down $IK or less than 1%.
Gamblinf;[ Tax
Gambling tax collection of $383K is $68K or 22% above
the year-to-date budget of $315K. In comparison to 2004
year-to-date collection, 2005's tax collection increased by
$42K or 12%.
GAMBLING TAX REVENUE
YTD Through March
Month 2004 2005 $Var "/oVar
Jan $115,177 $ 137,311 $ 22,133 19.2%
Feb 113,514 1~~}68 2,254 2.0%
Mar 112,880 130,206 17,326 15.3%
Apr 131,267 . - -
May 117,979 - - -
Jun 120.:.~47 - - -
Jul 121,637 - - -
Aug 110,541 - - -
Sep 114i.9,~7. - - -
Oct 109,466 - - -
Nav 127,293 - . .
Dee 148,574 . - -
YTD Total $341,572 383,285 41,713 12.2"/0
2
State Shared Revenue
Year-to-date distribution of $1.10M is above 2004's
activity by $24K or 2%. Liquor profits, local criminal
justice sales tax and fuel tax and is offset by a decline in
criminal justice high crime. Because of the City's
decrease in crime rates we don't qualify for criminal
justice high crime funding this year.
"
STATE SHARED REVENUES
Yea,-to-date thrv March
Revenue 2004 2005 $ Va, "Va,
Liquor Profits Tax $ 135,177 ~ 155,926 $ 20,748 15.3%
Liquor Excise Tax 77.515 82,474 4,959 6.4%
Crim Just Low-Pop/DCD 18,575 19,026 452 2.4%
~~t Hgh Crime 42,4~ - (42,464) -100-0%
~!im Just Sales Tax 404,801 432,987 28,186 7.0%
Fuel Tax' 404,749 416,642 11,893 2.9%
DUI - Cities - 3.532 ..- 3,502 (30) -0.9%
Total $ 1,086,814 $ 1,110,558 $ 23,744 2.2%
. Fuel tax is included In both genel<ll/$traet and designated operating funds-
Public Safety
Year-to-date City overtime is 33% or $32K above the
same period last year. There is a $5K decrease in overtime
for contracted services and the homeland security
programs. When the decrease from the billable overtime is
included, the total overtime increase is reduced to $27K or
21%.
PS Overtime By Type
Type 2004 2005 $ %
Training 3,297 3,187 (110) -3%
Court 13,645 8,213 (5,432) -40%
Field Operation 65,670 97,587 31,917 49%
SOAP 0%
Other 13,337 18,731 5,393 40%
City Portion 95,948 127,717 31,769 33%
Contract or Grant $ 30,502 $ 25,777 (4,725) -15%
Homeland Sec. 0%
Billable 30,502 25,777 (4,725) -15%
Grand Total $ 126,451 $153,494 $ 27,044 21%
PS Overtime By Month
Change
2004 2005 $ %
Jan $ 49,812 $ 50,235 $ 423 1%
Feb 39,014 54,688 15,675 40%
Mar 37,625 48,571 10,946 29%
Apr 40,501 - - -
May 45,787 - - -
Jun 57,703 ' - .
Jul 41,136 - . -
Aug 37,868 - - -
Sap 37,979 - - -
Oct 48,626 - - -
Nov 31,808 - - -
Dee 43641 - - .
YTD $ 126.451 $153,494 $ 27,044 21%
Annual Total $ 511 499 ~
H~
Court Revenue
Including probation revenue, the total collected through
March amounts to $296K which is $18K or 6% below
2004 's activity. Compared to year-to-date budget
estimate, court revenue is down by $30K or 10%.
Month
January
February__-
March
t---
¡April"...
~._-
June
July
~I!,f ust
October
~.r:
~~!>er
Subtotal
Probation Services
Year-to-date Total
COURT REVENUE
B- Month
2005
$62,746
65,903
58,844
'IoNar
-8.1%
-14.9%
-23.4%
$ Val
($5,547
(1~,~().gl
(1!,1!..,!2)
2004
$68,292
$77,41.:<'
$76.78~
$76.~i~-
$71.7~
$75,616
$82.183
p4,182
$68.267
$64.172
$52.749
$222,491
92,624
$315,115
-
-
..-.--
-
-","
"
-
-
-
--.-
"
-
"
..-.-'
-
"
-..."..
"
-
-
-
"...--
.--
-
-
-
($34,998)
16.667
($18.331)
$187,493
109,291
$296,784
-15.7%
18.0%
-5.8%
COURT REVENUE
By CategorY Throuoh March
.... 2004 2005 $ Var %Var
~!'.~~altie5 $2,522 $3,056 534 21.2%
Tr?ffic & Non-Parkin9 $133,393 124,783 (8,610) -6.5%
Parkin9 Infractions $9,772 7,191 (2,581) -26.4%
DUI & Other Misd ~30,544 24,295 (6,249) -20.5%
Criminal Traffic Misd $11,123 11.132 9 0.1%
Criminal Costs' $21,986 10.402 (11,584) -52.7%
Other $13,150 6,634 (6,516) -49.6%
Subtotal 222,491 187,493 (34,999) -15.7%
Probation Services 92,624 109,291 16,667 18.0%
Total $ 315,115 $ 296,784 $ (18,331) -5.8%
Traffic and non-parking fines total $125K and is down
$9K or 7% compared to 2004. Parking infractions total
$7K and is down $3K or 26%. DUI and other
misdemeanors total $24K and is down $6K or
20%.Criminal costs total $lOK and is down $12K or 53%.
3
Parks & Recreation
Overall parks operations expenditures through March total
$805K, which is $23K or 3% below the ytd budget of
$828K. Dumas Bay Centre revenues and expenditures are
both below budget while Knutzen Family Theatre's
revenue and expenditures exceed budget projections.
Recreation and Cultural Services
Direct program expenditures total $2l4K or 16.8% of the
total arumal budget of $1.28M not including indirect costs.
Including indirect administration costs, recreation
expenditures total $297K and are 18.4% of the total annual
budget of $1.61M. Recreation fees have recovered
117.1 % of direct program costs and is 52.3% above the
annual budgeted recovery ratio of 64.8%. Considering
indirect administration costs, the recovery ratio is reduced
to 84.5% or 33.2% above the annual budgeted recovery
ratio of51.3%.
,
Program
-
.'..'
Steel lake Aquatics
Arts & Special Events
Youth Athletics
Adult Athletics
~munity Recreation
Community Center
Recreation Inc
Youth Commission
Red, White & Blue'
Senior Services
Kenneth Jones Pool
Subtotal
Administration
I TOTAL RECREATION
2,000
93.600
60.558
204,970
.170.300
28,500
18,512
500
25,700
16.195
206,000
826,835 $
$
Dumas Bay Centre
Dumas Bay Centre operating revenue of $1 OOK is down by
$18K or 16% compared to the year-to-date budget of
$ I 18K. Operating expenditures through March total
$1O3K, which is $16K or 14% below the year-to~date
budget of $120K. Dumas Bay Centre has recovered
96.1 % of its operating expenses.
Knutzen Family Theatre
Operating revenue of$18K is up $7K or 59% compared to
the year-to-date budget of$llK. Operating expenditure of
$51.6K is down $lK or 2% compared to the year~to-date
budget of $50.8K. Knutzen Theatre has recovered
34.7% of its operating expenses.
1$
826,8351 $
I~:¡¡;; -:~;¡"-:,-.:¡:
250,ill]
30.3%1 $
RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS AND DUMAS BAY CENTRE PERFORMANCE
Year to Date Through March 31st
I Revenues I Expenditures I Recovery Ratio %
I Budget I Actual I % I Budget I Actual I %JBudget I Actual
RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS
- 0.0% 20,395
18,376 19.6% 112,726
12.814 21.2% 88.411
94.438 46.1% 128,035
36.417 21.4% .175,024
9,208 32.3% 62,955
13,792 74.5% 58,775
861 172.2% 1.800
7,050 27.4% 41,200
9,791 60.5% 68,111
48,07~ 23.3% 518.456
250,821 30.3% $ 1,275,888 $
I~:¡¡;; -:~;¡"-:,-.:¡:
I TOTAL DUMAS BAY CENTRE I $
Arts Commission
GRAND TOTAL
-
I~:¡¡;; -:~;¡"-:,-.:¡:
1,612,IEJ $
DUMAS BAY CENTRE
Dumas Bay Centre I 523,775 T 99,611 I 19.0%1 527,575 1 103,686 I 19.7%1 99.3%1 96.1%
Knutzen Family Theatre I 93,515 T 17,911 I 19.2%1 196,090 I 51,641 I 26.3%1 47.7%1 34.
23,032
16,308
20.531
45,957
23.983
5,876
796
600
20,149
56,909
214,142
82,659
296,801 I
-
0.0%
20.4%
18.4%
16.0%
26.3%
38.1%
10.0%
44.2%
1.5%
29.6%
11.0%
16.8%
24.6%
184%1
.'"
-.-
9.8%
83.0%
68.5%
160.1%
97.3%
45.3%
31.5%
27.8%
62.4%
23.8%
39.7%
64.8%
nla
513%1
-
n/a
79.8%
78.6%
460.0%
79.2%
38.4%
234.7%
108.2%
nta
48.6%
84.5%
117.1"1.
nta
845%1
Excludes Interfund transfe", and Celebration Pari<.
~~
4
DESIGNATED OPERATING FUNDS
Through March, designated operating funds revenue total $4.65M and is $423K above the year-to-date budget of $4.22M with
utility taxes and real estate excise taxes being the major contributors. Expenditures of $2.65M is $6K or less than 1 % above
the budget estimate by $2.64M.
~,. 2004 2005 -,-,~ Variance
DESIGNATED OPERATING FUNDS -- -
Annual YTD YTD Annual YTD YTD Favorable (Unfavorable)
Summary of Sources & Uses Budget Actual Actual Budget Budget March Dollars ($) Percent (%)
Begin Balance-Designated Funds $ 5,243,067 $ 5,215,069 $ 5,228.838 $ 4.696.652 $ 4,610,137 $ 4,610.137 $ - 0.0%
OPERATING REVENUES
Intergovernmental 576.976 553,636 130,332 596,245 134,161 134,161 - 0.0%
Utility Taxes 7,253.021 7,557,724 2.133.606 7.525,399 2,213,731 2,284,151 70,420 3.2%
Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax 134,000 142,030 28.246 150.000 31,619 30,540 (1,079) -3.4%
Real Estate Excise Tax 1.900.000 3,078,898 466,696 1,900,000 466.696 830.531 361,636 77.1%
Dumas Bay Centre 500,250 496,852 112,761 523,775 116,064 99,611 (18,473) -15.6%
Knutzen Family Theatre 76,601 73,999 9,226 93,515 11,263 17,911 6,646 59.0%
SWM Fees 3,437.136 3,522,667 245.236 3.576,746 172.126 172,126 - 0.0%
Refuse Collection Fees 166,545 179,056 66,744 167,701 66,400 55,273 (13,127) -19.2%
Interest Earnings 344,010 76,049 25,492 203,345 15,069 31,799 16,731 111.0%
Miscellaneous/Other - 23 12 - - 3 3 n/a
Ionaoina Transfers In: -
Utility Tax-Knutzen Theatre 100,000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100,000 - 0.0%
Utility Tax-Arterial Streets 1.193.804 1,193,804 1.193,804 690,625 690,625 690,625 - 0.0%
ITotal OpØ"¡'tÎngReVenues 15,&84,345 18,974,740 4,516,375 15,727,350 4,223,974 4;848,731 422,758; 10.00/c
þPERATING EXPENDITURES
City Overlay Program 2,270,632 2,243.765 1,049,292 1,547.040 54,053 54,053 - 0.0%
Utility Tax-Admin/Cash Mgmt Fees 53,561 53.561 13,390 54,429 13,606 13.608 - 0.0%
¡Solid Waste 367,661 290.037 76,326 366,921 82.432 81,064 1,368 1.7%
Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax 350,999 186.625 20,536 325,196 28.561 28,561 - 0.0%
Debt Service 5,669,831 5,532.121 196,456 4,483,126 151,016 151,016 - 0.0%
¡Surface Water Management 2,718,696 2.587.905 492,400 2,876,976 521,429 544,039 (22,610) 4.3%
Dumas Bay Centre 501,630 464,372 114,116 527.575 120,018 103.686 16.332 13.6%
Knutzen Family Theatre 179,177 202,397 46.476 196.090 50,863 51,641 (777) -1.5%
Onooina .
Utility Tax-Celebration Park 231,643 231,843 231,843 236.796 238,798 236,796 - 0.0%
Utility Tax-Kenneth Jones Pool 309,000 283,910 78,521 314.000 29,244 29.244 - 0.0%
Utility Tax-Arts/Parks Prog - - - 93,750 - - - n/a
Utility Tax-Police Positions - - - 625,000 - - - n/a
Utility Tax-Street Bond Projects 182,852 162,653 - 192.000 192,000 192.000 - 0.0%
Utility Tax-New Street Lights - - 93,900 93,900 93,900 - 0.0%
Utility Tax-Knutzen Family Theatre 100.000 100,000 100,000 1 00, 000 100,000 100,000 - 0.0%
Utility Tax-Arterial Streets Overlay 1,193,804 1.193,804 1,193,804 890,625 890,625 890,625 - 0.0%
Utility Tax-Transportation CIP . - - 690,625 75,000 75,000 - O.O"!.
otal Operating Expenditures 14,349,488 13,573,194 3,817,188 13,838,053 2,841,547 2,847,234 (5,887) -D.2"!.
Dperating Revenues over/(under)
Operating Expenditures 1,334,857 3,401,546 899,208 1,889.297 1,582,427 1,999,498 417,071 28.4"!.
DTHER FINANCING SOURCES
One-Time Transfers In 4.362.836 4,253,236 1,317,723 4,242,273 137,073 137,073 - 0.0"!.
Grants/Mitigation/Other 139.726 174,975 63,365 175,036 99,066 99.066 - O.ooA
Total Other Financing Sources 4,522,582 4,428,211 1,381,088 4,417,309 236,139 236,139 . 0.0%
þTHER FINANCING USES
One-Time Transfers Out 8.409.601 8,434,690 2.899,723 6,469,577 1,866,860 1,886,860 . 0.0%
Other - - - - . . - nla
Total Other Financing Uses 8,409,601 8,434,690 2,899,723 6,469.577 1,886,860 1,886,860 . 0.0%
ENDING FUND BALANCE
Arterial Street (0) 66,032 768,971 - 1.071,326 nla n/a
Utility Tax 837,166 1.095,578 2,430 887,577 - 1,483,318 n/a nla
Solid Waste & Recycling 83,536 105.142 171,656 80.985 - 144,575 n/a n/a
Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax - 175.196 225,480 - - 178,208 n/a n/a
Paths & Trails 5.531 5,629 63.355 14,991 " 7.895 n/a n/a
Debt Service Fund 1,547,857 2,826.227 2.831.985 2.815,372 2,064.407 nla n/a
Surface Water Management 214,656 355.735 484.174 738,251 (14,191) n/a n/a
Dumas Bay Centre Operations 2.120 (9.450) (23.673) 344 - (13,624) n/a n/a
Knutzen Family Theatre (1) (9,954) 85.033 (3.839) - 57,002 n/a n/a
otal Ending Fund Balance $ 2,890,885 $ 4,810,137 $ 4,809,411 $ 4,533,881 $ - $ 4,958,915 $ 428,445 n/
5
WI
Utility Tax
Utility taxes received through March total $2.28M, which
is $70K or 3% above the year-to~date budget total of
$2.2IM. Compared to year-to-date 2004, utility tax
increased $151K or 7%.
UTILITY TAXES
Year-la-date thru March
Month Actual 2004 2005 %Var
Jan $ 687,590 $ 7~_1ß14 $ 73,423 10.7%
Feb 7j1,009 794,152 53,143 7.2%
Mar 705,007 731,O6~.. 26,057 3.7%
Apr 709,531 - - -
May 617,502 - - -
-------L-
Jun 565,7?8 - - -
Jul 554,115 - - -
__",.m
Aug 540,643 - . -
Sep 545,963 - - -
,.,. 584,695
Oct . - -
~-
Nov 595.016 - - -
Dee 670,612 - - -
ax Rebate (5,068) (2,07~) 2,989 -59.0%
YTD Total $ 2,133,607 $ 2,284,151 $ 150,544 7.1"1.
Tax rebates art! excluded from the total in 2004.
Compared to 2004 year-to-date activity: electricity is up
$3K or less than 1%; gas taxes are up $41K or 9%; cable is
up $35K or 20%; cellular is $83K or 24% while phone is
down $14K or 5%.
UTILITY TAXES
Yearcto-date thru March
2004 2,005 $Var %Var
Electric $ 755,078 $ 758.488 $ 3,410 0.5%
Gas 45i'p',793 502,283 41,490 9.0%
Solid Waste 125,090 130,576 5,486 4.4%
Cable 178,937 214,428 35,491 19.8%
Phone 260,571 246,981 (13,590) -5.2%
Cellular 341,168 424,453 83,285 24.4%
Pager 1,068 546 (522) -48.9%
SWM 10,901 8,475 (2,426) -22.3%
Tax Rebate ---
(5,068) (2,079) 2,989 .59.0%
Total $ 2,133,607 $ 2,284,151 $ 150,544 7.1'Y.
Tax rebates are excluded from the total
Real Estate Excise Tax
To date, REET of $830K is above the year-to-date budget
of $469K by $362K or 77%. March's receipt of $384K
exceeds 2004's activity by $184K or 92% and includes a
Hß
total of355 real estate transactions, of which 110 were tax
exempt and of remaining 245, 9 were mobile home sales.
The largest transactions in the current month consist of the
sale of Lowes Hardware store @ 35205 Enchanted Pkwy
S, and North Shore Village Shopping Center @ 2140 SW
356th St.
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX REVENUES
Year-to-date thrll March
Month Actual Actual $ ,Va, %Vát
Jan $ 122,026~ _L.",1}Qc§_~? $ 48,840 40.0%
Feb 147,294 275,617 128,323 87.1%
Mar 199,576 . .,..,.__~~4,048 184,472 92.4%
Apr 243,531 - ,. ..._,.,~
May 182,533 ,. - -
Jun 604,017 - - -
,-,.-~
Jul 285,928 - -
AU9 205,322 ---"._,--"~
~ - -
Sep 279,951 ,. ,. -
Oct 199,627 ,. - -
Nav 288,344 - . -
Dee 299,596 - ,. -
'-----Vt!5ìò1ìil- $ 468,896 $ 830,531 $ 361,636 77. 1"/.
HoteVMotel Lodging Tax
Hotel/Motel lodging tax collections through March total
$31K, which is $IK or 3% below the year-to-date budget
of $32K. Compared to 2004 actual, the lodging tax
increased by $2K or 8%.
'" " 'i":"
HO TEUMO TEL LODGING TAX REVENUES
Year-to-date thru March ,','
Month 2004 2005 ""'$Var % Vat
Jan $ 9,377 $ 9,669 $ 292 3.1%
Feb 11,529 11,717 189 1.6%
Mar 7,340 9.153 1,812 24.7%
Apr 11,775 ~ - -
_.
May 9,613 . - -
Jun 11,554 - . -
Jul 10,352 . - -
!--------------Aug 14,065 - . -
Sep 16,496 . - -
-,-
Oct 15,546 - - -
Nov 12,932 . - -
Dee 11,157 - - -
TiLl IOUlI $ 28,246 $ 30,540 $ 2,293 8.1%
6
CASH & INVESTMENTS
The following table shows the in-house investment activity schedule and their related yields and comparison to benchmark. Per
policy, the basis used by the City to determine whether market yields are being achieved is the range between the average 6
month US Treasury Bill (3.08%) and the State Investment Pool (2.55%). The current in-house investment yield is 2.57%
which is slightly greater than the state investment pool and is below the average T-bill rate. We are working on re-establishing
our in-house investment program.
Investment Schedule
March 2005
Settlement Investment Maturity Yield to
Tvoe Date Par Amount Cost Date Maturity
AQency - FNMA 3136F3V3 07/21/03 $ 800,000 $ 797,500 07/21106 2.38%
AQencv - FHLB 31339YZX3 08114/03 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 08114/06 2.52%
Aqency - FFCB 31331QN78 06/09/03 $ 1,000,000 $ 999,500 03109/07 2.46%
AQencv - FNMA 3136F3VQ6 OS/27/03 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,750 OS/25/07 2.48%
Aqency - FNMA 3136F3UT1 05/30103 $ 1,000,000 $ 997,529 12/03107 2.59%
AQencv - FHLMC 3128X1VW4 08/22/03 $ 900,000 $ 887,400 01/30107 3.18%
Subtotal In-House Investments $ 5,682,679
Averaqe Maturity 343
Averaae Yield to MaturItY 2.61%
Averaae Yield - 6 mo. T-Bill 3.08%
MuniciDallnvestor Account $ 16,387,170 1 day 2.60%
State Investment Pool $ 35,858,306 1 day 2.55%
Averaae Portfolio Maturitv & Yield 62 2.57%
Iotallnvestments ....... $51,928,155 ..
The total invested balance at the end of March is $57.9M, which includes $35.8M in the state investment pool, $5.7M in-house
investment purchases, and $16.4M in the Municipal Investor Accounts. The state pool is composed of agency coupons and
callables (1.0%), discount notes (41.13%), certificates of deposit (7.43%), treasury securities (8.52%), agency floating rate
notes (13.00%) and repurchase agreements (28.92%). The City's total investment portfolio is made up 62% State Pool, 10%
In-House Investments, and 28% Municipal Investors Accounts.
Total Portfolio by Category
March 31 ,2005
M.micipal
hvenstors
Account
28%
h-House
hvest
(Agencies)
10%
H9
Interest Rates Comparison
For the Month of March
4.0%
3.5%
3.0%
2.5%
2.0%
1.5%
1.0%
0.5%
0.0% .
2003
116 Month T-Bill
. State Investment
Pool
0 In-house
Investment
II Municipal Investor
Account
. Portfolio Average
2004
2005
~--'_._.
7
MEETING DATE:
11
May I, 2005
ITEM#~ .~lG1) ,
/
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
Proposed Cingular Franchise
CATEGORY:
J'5{ CONSENT
5 RESOLUTION
D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
BUDGET IMPACT:
r8J ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$0.00
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum dated April 26, 2005 to the Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs
Committee, Proposed Franchise
............................,.....................................",.....",........",............"""""""",.""..",."..,........mmmmmm
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND:
The basic terms of the proposed franchise are as follows:
1. Equipment. The franchise would permit Cingular to place wireless transmitting facilities and related
appurtenances in the City owned or controlled rights-of-way.
2. Consideration. Cingular will pay the City's administrative costs and expenses in preparing and approving the
franchise and any permits. Cingular will also relocate its facilities at the City's request, at Cingular's cost, and repair any
damages it causes to the right-of-way, also at its own cost.
3. Insurance. Cingular will maintain insurance of $5 Million combined single limit for commercial general
liability, $5 Million for automobile insurance and a minimum of$l Million for Employers liability insurance.
4. Term. The term of the proposed franchise is 10 years, consistent with franchises the City has granted to
Olympic Pipeline, for pipeline maintenance; AT&T (now Comcast), for cable; Puget Sound Energy; Tacoma Public
Utilities; Weyerhaeuser, Sprint, Metromedia and Williams (for fiber optic cable); AT&T Wireless Services and
Voice Stream (for wireless facilities).
5. Bond. The proposed franchise requires Cingular to post a bond in the amount of $50,000 before commencing
any work within the City to guarantee performance of construction, maintenance or repair in accordance with any permits
required by this Franchise.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed Franchise.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move the proposed Franchise to second reading and approval at the next regular meeting on
May 17, 2005"
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
~.....
(BEl-OW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY Cl~ERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
D APPROVED
D DENIED
D T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
~ MOVE!,> J.- ~. SECOND READING (ordinances only)
'3¡-J/C, ~
K:\AGNDITEM\2005\Cingular Franchise
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
3(ç¿;
5~/oI
5. ì 7/os
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
April 26, 2005
VIA:
Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee
David H. MO~ager
\' l/
Karen KirkpatricJ.\) , eputy City Attorney
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Proposed Cingular Franchise
Policy Issue
Should the City grant Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (Cingular) a Franchise to occupy Rights-
of- Way of the City of Federal Way, for the purposes of installation, operation, maintenance,
and repair of its wireless communications fixtures and related equipment, cables, accessories
and improvements in a portion of the Rights-of-Way within and through the City ofF ederal
Way?
Background
The basic terms of the proposed franchise are as follows:
1. Equipment. The ftanchise would permit Cingular to place wireless transmitting
facilities and related appurtenances in the City owned or controlled rights-of-way. A current
proposal is for a facility on a replacement utility pole with a height of 49 feet and three panel
antennas measuring 56 inches by 8 inches.
2. Consideration. Cingular will pay the City's administrative costs and expenses in
preparing and approving the franchise and any permits. CinguIar will also relocate its
facilities at the City's request, at Cingular's cost, and repair any damages it causes to the
right-of-way, also at its own cost.
3. Insuran ceo Cingular wi 11 maintain insurance of $5 Million combined single limit
for commercial general 11 ability, $5 Million for automobile insurance and a minimum of$1
Million for Employers liability insurance.
4. Term. The term ofthe proposed franchise is 10 years, consistent with franchises
the City has granted to Olympic Pipeline, for pipeline maintenance; AT&T (now Comcast),
for cable; Puget Sound Energy; Tacoma Public Utilities; Weycrhaeuscr, Sprint, Metromedia
and Williams (for fiber optic cable); AT&T Wireless Services and VoiceStream (for
c,l
wireless facilities).
5. Bond. The proposed franchise requires Cingular to post a bond in the amount of
$50,000 before commencing any work within the City to guarantee perfonnance of
construction, maintenance or repair in accordance with any permits required by this
Franchise.
Options
1. Recommend approval of the Ordinance and forward to the full council for first
reading at the May 3,2005 meeting.
2. Recommend rejection of the Ordinance.
3. Recommend modification ofthe Ordinance and forward to the fun council for first
reading at the May 3,2005 meeting.
Staff Recommendation
Approve the Ordinance and forward to the full council for first reading at the May 3, 2005
meeting. (Option 1)
Committee Recommendation
Forward option ~ to the full City Council for placement on the May 3,2005 City Council
Agenda for first reading with a "do pass" recommendation.
APPROV AL OF COMMITTE
i_"
/
K:\agnditem\fedrac\Cingular ordinance
GZ-
.~~
~~
DRAFT
SP/6~Ç-
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, GRANTING NEW
CINGULAR WIREIJESS PCS, LLC, A DELAWARE
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, A NONEXCLUSIVE
FRANCHISE TO OCCUpy RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF THE CITY
OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, WITHIN THE
SPECIFIED FRANCHISE AREA FOR THE PURPOSES OF
INSTALLATION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND
REPAIR OF ITS WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
FIXTURES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT, CABLES,
ACCESSORIES AND IMPROVEMENTS IN A PORTION OF
THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY WITHIN AND THROUGH THE
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY.
WHEREAS, the New Cingular Wireless PCS,. LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
Company, ("Franchisee") has requested a Franchise from the City of Federal Way, in order to
place wireless transmitting facilities and related appurtenances in the City owned or controlled
rights-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of Federal Way finds that it is in the public interest to grant
such a Franchise which will specify the rights and duties of Franchisee; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.47.040 et. seq. and RCW 35.99 et seq. pem1Ît the City of Federal
Way to grant nonexclusive Franchises for the use of public streets, bridges or other public ways
for, inter alia, conduits, wires and appurtenances for transmission of signals and other methods
of communications; and
WHEREAS, in granting such a nonexclusive Franchise Agreement, the City of Federal
Way reserves such other powers and authorities granted to Washington code cities by general
law;
ORD#
, 1 of 26 pages
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Defmitions
Where used in this Franchise the following tenns shall be defined as follows:
1.1
"City" means the City of Federal Way, Washington, a municipal corporation of
the State of Washington, and its respective successors and assigns.
1.2
"Council" means the City of Federal Way Council acting inits official capacity.
1.3
"Director" means the Public Works Director, or designee, of the City of Federal
Way Public Works Department.
\.4
"Facilities" means: (i) wireless communications facilities, including, but not
limited to, electronic equipment, radio transmitting and receiving apparatus, and supporting
equipment to be located on a pole on a certain public right of way, base station transmitting
cabinets, radio frequency antennas and locating antennas, (ii) underground fiber optic
telecommunication lines or similar lines, and (iii) any appurtenances necessary to connect the
lines or similar lines to the existing switched telephone network all as shown on Exhibit A.
\.5
"Franchise Area" means only that portion of the City owned or controlled rights-
of-way located in the City of Federal Way and shown in Exhibit A attached hereto (excluding
privately owned property), and/or any other areas approved by the Federal Way City Council and
incorporated into this Ordinance via amendment.
\.6
"Franchisee" means New Cingu1ar Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, and its respective successors and assigns if consented to by the City of Federal
Way as provided in Section 27 herein.
1.7
"FWCC" means the Federal Way City Code.
ORD # ------' 201'26 pages
Section 2.
Grant/ AcceDtance
2.1
Grant of Master Agreement.
The City hereby grants to Franchisee the nonexclusive right to enter upon the Franchise
Area for the limited purpose of constructing, excavating, installing, maintaining, restoring,
upgrading, and repairing Facilities within the Franchise Area. This Franchise is specifically
limited to the right for Franchisee to install Facilities owned and operated by Franchisee. This
Franchise does not permit Franchisee to lease, rent, or otherwise allow use of conduits, space or
capacity provided by the Facilities for or to cable and other third-party cable or
telecommunications providers, and Franchisee covenants and agrees that it will not do so.
2.2
Acceptance by Franchisee. Franchisee shall have no rights under this Franchise,
nor shall Franchisee be bound by the tenus and conditions of this Franchise, unless Franchisee
shall, within sixty (60) days after the effective date of this Franchise, file with the City its written
acceptance of this Franchise and all of its terms and conditions.
Section 3.
Non-Franchise Area City ProDerty
This Franchise does not and shall not convey any right to Franchisee to install its
Facilities on, under, over, across, or to otherwise use City-owned or leased properties of any kind
outside the Franchise Area, or to install Facilities Oll, under, over, across or otherwise use any
City owned or leased property within the Franchise Area other than public roads, streets,
avenues. alleys and highways.
Additionally, this Franchise docs not convey any right to
Franchisee to install its Facilities on, under, over, across private property or any other
governmental authorities' property or on any other person or entity's poles or apparatus, and
Franchisee is responsible for obtaining any authorizations, agreements or consents from private
property owners, any other governmental authorities and any other persons or entities.
ORD #_-------, 3 of 26 pages
Section 4.
Term
Subject to Franchisee filing its acceptance pursuant to Subsection 2.2, the term of this
Franchise shall be for a period of ten (10) years commencing on the effective date of this
Franchise, unless terminated earlier pursuant to this Franchise or other applicable law.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Franchisee may terminate this Franchise, and remove its
facilities, at any time upon at least 90-days written notice to the City.
Section 5.
Location of Facilities
5.1
Location. In addition to the other requirements of this Franchise, Franchisee shall
submit to the City an "as-built" plan for each Facility, including any underground portiones) of
the Facility and appurtenances, their depths below surface of ground or grade of a right-of-way,
and any related existing equipment (such as cellular or personal communication service
antelll1ae) to which the Facility is connected, within thirty (30) days of the installation of each
Facility. Any fiber line or conduit permitted by this Franchise which runs [Tom the pole in the
rights-of-way to the equipment shed or building on private property shall be installed
underground. Upon written request of the City, Franchisee shall update such "as-built" plan to
reflect actual or anticipated improvements to any of Franchisee's Facilities. Any such "as-built"
plan (or update thereof) so submitted shall be for informational purposes only and shall not
obligate Franchisee to undertake any specific improvements, nor shall such map be construed as
a proposal to undertake any specific improvements.
5.2
GIS Data.
At such time as Franchisee develops or employs Geographic
Information System ("GIS") technology, Franchisee shall submit the information required in
Subsection 5.1 above in digital GIS format.
5.3
Design
Markings.
In the event the City desires to design new streets or
intersections, renovate existing streets, or make any other public improvements, Franchisee shall,
ORD #_~.._-_._, 4 of26 pages
at the City of Federal Way's reasonable request, provide the location of Franchisee's Facilities
within the Franchise Area by either field markings or by locating the Facilities on the City's
design drawings, and shall provide all other reasonable cooperation and assistance to the City.
5.4
Utilities. Nothing herein is intended to relieve the parties of their respective
obligations arising under Chapter 19.122 RCW or other app licab Ie law with respect to
determining the location of utility facilities prior to construction.
Section 6.
Noninterference of Facilities
Franchisee agrees to maintain its Facilities and perform any and all activities authorized
by this Franchise: (1) so as not to unreasonably interfere with the free passage of traffic; (2) in
accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and City Code requirements, Franchise
provisions, regulations, resolutions, rules, and publicly available policies of general applicability
as now existing or as hereafter amended; and (3) as required by the Director in accordance with
the foregoing or given public health, safety and welfare. This requirement applies whether or not
the work is performed by the Franchisee, its agents, employees, subcontractors, or other third
parties at Franchisee's direction.
Section 7.
Requirement to Obtain Permits
7.1
Pem1Îts and Permit Applications.
Franchisee shall, at its expense, obtain all permits, including rights-of-way permits, and
pay all pennit fees required by applicable City ordinances, regulations, resolutions, publicly
available policies, and rules prior to commencing any work within the Franchise Area.
Franchisee permit applications shall show the position and location of the proposed Facilities to
be constructed, laid, installed, or erected at that time, show their relative position to existing
rights-of-way or property lines upon prints drawn to scale, designate rights-of-way by their
names and improvements, such as, but not limited to, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, shoulders of
ORD#
, 5 of 26 pages
roadway, ditches, paved roadways, roadways to property lines, turnouts, parking strips,
telephone or electric distribution poles, and water pipes existing on the ground to be occupied, or
as otherwise reasonably required by the Director. The Franchisee shall specify the class and type
of materials to be used, equipment to be used, and method of safeguarding and facilitating the
public traffic during construction. Materials and equipment shall be in new or like new condition
for its type and kind.
The manner of excavation, construction, installation, backfill, and
temporary structures such as, but not limited to, traffic turnouts and road obstructions shall meet
the standards of the FWCC and be reasonably satisfactory to the Director. All traffic control
shall be in accordance with the rights-of-way permit, and shall be in accordance with the Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The Franchisee shall indicate on any permit
application the time needed to complete the work. The time needed to complete the work is
subject to approval by the City, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, as a condition of the
issuance ofthe permit or approval.
7.2
Emergency Exception to Permit Requirement.
In the event of an emergency in which Franchisee's Facilities within the Franchise Area
are 10 a condition as to immediately endanger the property, life, health or safety of any
individual, Franchisee may take action immediately to COlTect the dangerous condition without
first obtaining any required permit so long as: (1) Franchisee informs the City of the nature and
extent of the emergency, and the work to be performed, prior to or conCUlTent with commencing
the work; and (2) such pemlit is obtained by Franchisee as soon as reasonably practicable
following cessation of the emergency.
Section 8.
Standard of Performance
The Franchisee shall not excavate for a distance of more than one hundred fect (100')
without immediately backfilling and compacting to surface grade and city standards. BackfIlled
ORD#
,6 of26 pages
trench areas within a driving lane must be patched, either temporarily or permanently, before the
end of the work day in which they have been opened. Trench areas within the rights~of-way, but
not within a driving lane, must also be patched within the time limits specified by the City on the
rights-of-way use permit. Final surface restoration shall be completed within thirty (30) days
and shall be equal to or better than the surface condition prior to permit issuance.
Any asphalt overlay completed within the Franchise Area during the five (5) year period
immediately prior to the date of permit application shall not be open cut by Franchisee unless
required by an emergency and subject to the provisions of Subsection 7.2 above. Franchisee
shall install new asphalt overlay on any street that is open cut, whether in an emergency or
otherwise, for a minimum of one (1) block (approximately 500 feet) in length in both directions
from the open cut, unless determined otherwise by the Director in accordance with FWCC
regulations or Department of Public Works internal policies.
Within forty-five (45) days of completion of any installation of Franchisee's Facilities
within the Franchise Area, Franchisee shall submit to the Director plans, stamped by a
Professional Engineer or surveyor licensed by the State of Washington, showing the "as-built"
location of the Facilities.
Section 9.
Survev Markers and Monuments
Franchisee shall, at its sole cost and expense, and USll1g a licensed surveyor, timely
replace or repair all markers or monuments displaced or damaged as a result of any work by
Franchisee within the Franchise Area.
Section 10.
Surface Mar-kines/Stakes
Prior to Franchisee commencing any excavation work within the Franchise Area,
Franchisee shall using a licensed surveyor reference all monuments and markers relating to
subdivisions, plats, highways, and other surveys. The reference points shall be located so that
ORD#
.~-' 7 of 26 pages
they shall not be disturbed during the Franchisee's operations under this Franchise.
The
Franchisee shall be responsible for the cost of repairing or replacing monuments or other markers
lost, destroyed, or disturbed as a result of any work by Franchisee within the Franchise Area. A
complete set of reference notes for monuments, markers and other ties shall be filed with the
City.
Section 11.
Rieht of City to Complete Work
In the event Franchisee fails to comply with any applicable federal, state or City laws,
ordinances, rules, regulations, publicly available policies, or standards or with any of the terms of
this Franchise, and such noncompliance continues for a period of thirty (30) days after
Franchisee receives written notice from the City regarding the noncompliance, the City may, but
in no event is the City obligated to, order any work completed, including without limitation
Franchisee's obligation to repair pursuant to Section 8 herein and Franchisee's obligation to
remove or relocate facilities pursuant to Section 12 herein. If the City causes such work to be
done by its own employees or by any person or entity other than Franchisee, Franchisee shall,
upon the City's written request, reimburse the City for all reasonable costs and expenses incurred
by the City in having such work performed, which costs may include the City's reasonable
overhead expenses and attorneys fees, within sixty (60) days. However, the City shall not have
any electrical work accomplished by any person or entity other than Franchisee or a qualified
and licensed electrical contractor.
Section 12.
Notice to Franchisee of Work by City
12.1
City Reservation of Rights. The City reserves the right to use, occupy and enjoy
all or any part of the Franchise Area, either above, below, or adjacent to the Facilities consistent
with the terms and conditions of this Franchise. The rights reserved herein include, without
limitation, the construction, installation, and/or maintenance of any electrical, water, sewer or
ORD#
, 8 of 26 pages
stonn drainage line, traffic signals, street lights, trees, landscaping, bicycle paths and lanes,
equestrian trails, sidewalks, other pedestrian amenities, and other public street improvement
projects.
This Franchise is not an exclusive Franchise and shall not be construed in any manner to
prohibit the City from granting other and further franchises in, under, over, upon, and along the
Franchise Area, nor from exercising such other powers and authorities granted to the. City by the
Washington State Constitution and general law.
Franchisee shall operate the Facilities in a manner that will not cause interference to the
City, and other lessees, franchisees, or licensees of the Franchise Area whose use predates this
Franchise. In addition, with respect to lessees, franchisees or licensees whose operations
commence after installation of the Facilities hereunder, Franchisee shall not make any change in
its operations that causes or is intended to cause material interference with such lessees,
franchisees or licensees. All operations by Franchisee shall be in compliance with all Federal
Communications Commission ("FCC") regulations.
Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-971 as it now exists or is hereafter amended, the City may
issue pennits for and enter into franchises and leases that allow location or collocation of other
telecommunications facilities in the Franchise Area, and Franchisee consents to same, provided
however, that the location or collocation must occur in compliance with said FWCC Section 22-
971 as it now exists or is hereafter amended.
In the event that any such location or collocation results in interference with Franchisee's
operations, and provided that Franchisee has substantially complied with the provisions of this
Franchise, the City agrees to take reasonable steps to cause the interfering party to eliminate such
interference, including, but not limited to, revoking the interfering party's pemlÎt(s) or
approval(s). In case of interference between two or more wireless carriers, the City shall give
ORD#
----' 9 of 26 pages
priority to the wireless carner who was first in time at the particular location where the
interference is being experienced. In the event that the interference is not eliminated within
thirty (30) days of notice to City by Franchisee, Franchisee may tenninate this Franchise
immediately and pursue any and all remedies available to it against the interfering party.
12.2
City's Duties. The City may require Franchisee to relocate one or more of its
Facilities in the Franchise Area when reasonably necessary for construction, alteration, repair or
improvement of the right-of-way for purposes of public welfare, health or safety, (hereinafter
collectively referred to as "Improvement Project"). In the event the City requires Franchise to
relocate one or more of its Facilities, the City shall:
A.
Within a reasonable time, which shall be no less than one hundred eighty
(180) days, prior to the commencement of the Improvement Project, provide the Franchisee with
written notice requiring it to relocate its Facility. The Franchisee shall complete relocation of its
Facilities so as to accommodate the improvement project at least ten (l0) days prior to
commencement of the improvement project, unless the City or a court establishes a later date for
completion, after a showing by the Franchisee that thc relocation cannot be completed by the
date specified using best efforts and meeting safety and service requirements.
B.
In the event of an emergency posing a threat to public safety, health or
welfare, or in the event of an emergency beyond the control of the City, the City shall give the
Franchisee written notice to relocate as soon as practicable. The Franchisee shall relocate its
Facilities within a reasonable time period specified by the Public Works Director, unless a court
establishes a later date for completion, after a showing by the Franchisee that the relocation
cannot be completed by the date specified using best efforts and meeting safety and servIce
requirements.
-' 10 of26 pages
ORD#
12.3
As part of any notice to relocate, the City shall provide the Franchisee with copies
of the plans and related information for the improvement project necessitating the relocation and
shall identify reasonable alternative locations in the right-of-way for the Franchisee's Facilities.
The City shall make a reasonable effort to process any permits required for a replacement
Facility in a timely fashion to enable the Franchisee to construct a replacement Facility before
the Franchisee is required to remove the original Facility.
12.4
The Franchisee may, after receipt of written notice requesting a relocation of its
I
Facilities, submit to the City written alternatives to such relocation. The City shall evaluate such
alternatives and advise the Franchisee in writing if one or more of the alternatives are suitable to
accommodate the work which would otherwise necessitate relocation of the Facilities. The City
shall give each alternative proposed by the Franchisee full and fair consideration, within a
reasonable time, so as to allow for the relocation work to be performed in a timely manner. In
the event the City ultimately determines, after due consideration, that there is no other reasonable
alternative, the Franchisee shall relocate its Facilities as otherwise provided in this Section.
12.5
Unless otherwise provided in RCW 35.99.060, the Franchisee shall complete
relocation of its Facilities at no charge or expense to the City.
12.6
The provisions of this Section shall in no manner preclude or restrict the
Franchisee from making any arrangements it may deem appropriate when responding to a
request for relocation of its Facilities by any person or entity other than the City, where the
Facilities to be constructed by said person or entity are not or will not become City-owned,
operated or maintained Facilities; provided that such arrangements do not unreasonably delay a
City improvement project.
ORD#
,11 of26 pages
Section 13.
Damaee Repair
In case of damage by the Franchisee, its agents or employees or by the Facilities of the
Franchisee to rights-of-way, or to public and private improvements in the rights-of-way, the
Franchisee agrees to repair the damage at its own cost and expense. The Franchisee shall, upon
discovery of any such damage, promptly notify the City. The City will inspect the damage, and
coordinate with the Franchisee to establish a schedule for completing the repair. If the City
discovers damage caused by the Franchisee to rights-of-way, or to public and private
improvements in the rights-of-way, the City shall give the Franchisee notice of the damage and
coordinate with the Franchisee to establish a schedule for repairing the damage. In the event the
Franchisee does not repair a right-of-way or an improvement to a right-of-way as required in this
section, the City may repair the damage pursuant to Section 11 of this Agreement.
Section 14.
Default
14.1
Notice of Default. In addition to other remedies set forth herein, if Franchisee
fails to comply with any of the provisions of this Franchise, the City may serve a written notice
to Franchisee ordering such compliance and Franchisee shall have thirty (30) days from the
receipt of such notice in which to comply.
14.2
Revocation of Franchise. If Franchisee has not cured the default within thirty (30)
days of receiving notice from the City of such default, or if such default is not curable within
thirty (30) days, if the Franchisee fails to commence such cure within thirty (30) days or fails
thereafter diligently to pursue such cure to completion, the City may, by resolution, declare the
Franchise immediately revoked.
ORD#
, 12 of26 pages
Section IS.
Limited Riehts
This Franchise is intended to convey only a limited right and interest to Franchisee in the
Franchise Area. This Franchise is not a warranty of title or conveyance of any ownership
interest in or to the Franchise Area to Franchisee.
Section 16.
Eminent Domain
The existence of this Franchise shall not preclude the City from acquiring by
condemnation, in accordance with applicable law, all or a portion of Franchisee's Facilities
..
within the Franchise Area for the fair market value thereof. In detem1ining the value of such
Facilities, no value shall be attributed to the right to occupy the Franchise Area conferred by this
Franchise.
Section 17.
Vacation
If at any time the City, by ordinance, vacates all or any portion of the Franchise Area, the
City will not be liable for any damages or loss to the Franchisee by reason of such vacation. The
City shall notify Franchisee in writing not less than sixty (60) days before vacating all or any
portion of the Franchise Area. The City may, after sixty (60) days written notice to Franchisee,
terminate this Franchise with respect to any such vacated area.
Section 18.
Compliance with Laws
18.1
General. Franchisee shall comply with all applicable federal, state and City laws,
resolutions, regulations, publicly available standards and procedures, as now existing or hereafter
amended or adopted, including without limitation the State Environmental Policy Act; provided,
however, that if any teffi1 or condition of this Franchise and any tenn or condition of any City
law, code, franchise, resolution, regulation, standard, procedure, pem1Ît or approval are in
conflict, the tenn or condition of this Franchise will control.
ORD#
,13 of26 pages
18.2
Future City of Federal Way Regulation. Franchisee acknowledges that the City
may develop generally applicable rules, regulations, ordinances and specifications for the use of
the rights-of-way which shall govern Franchisee's Facilities and activities hereunder as if they
were in effect at the time this Franchise was executed by the City and Franchisee covenants and
agrees to be bound by same, provided they do not conflict with state law.
Section 19.
Guarantee
Franchisee shall guarantee work completed by the
Franchisee under this Franchise for a period of 10 years against settlement or repair.
Section 20.
Charg:e for Administrative Costs
Franchisee agrees to pay a fee or a charge to recover the actual reasonable administrative
expenses incurred by the City that are directly related to preparing and approving this Franchise.
Nothing herein shall preclude the City from charging administrative fees or recovering any
administrative costs incurred by the City in the approval of permits or in the supervision,
inspection or examination of all work by Franchisee in the Franchise Area as prescribed in
accordance with applicable provisions of the FWCc.
Section 21.
In demnifica tion
Franchisee agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its elected officials,
officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and
liabilities (including costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or entities,
including, without limitation, their respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising from
or resulting from this Franchise to the extent caused in part or in whole by the acts, errors or
omissions of the Franchisee, its officers, partners, shareholders, managers, members, agents,
employees, or by the Franchisee's breach of any provisions of this Franchise; provided, however,
that this section shall not be construed as requiring Franchisee to indemnify, hold harmless or
defend the City against claims or damages arising from the negligence, acts or omissions of the
, 14 of26 pages
ORD#
City, its agents, employees, independent contractors, officers, or volunteers. in the event any
claim, demand, suit or action is commenced against the City that gives rise to Franchisee's
obligation pursuant to this Section, the City shall promptly notify Franchisee thereof.
Franchisee's selection of an attomey to defend any such claim, demand, suit, or action shall be
subject to the City's approval, which shall not be unreasonably witlÙ1eld. Franchisee shall not
settle or compromise any such suit or action except with prior written consent of the City, which
shall not be unreasonably withheld. The City shall have the right at all times to participate
through its own attomey in any suit or action which arises pursuant to this Franchise when the
City detennines that such participation is required to protect the interest of the City or the public.
In the event it is detennined that RCW 4.24.115 applies to this Franchise, Franchisee agrees to
defend, hold hannless and indemnify the City to the maximum extent pennitted thereunder, to
the full extent of Franchisee's negligence.
Section 22.
Insurance
22.1
Minimum Limits. The Franchisee agrees to carry as a minimum, the following
insurance, with carriers licensed to do business in the state of Washington and with a minimum
rating as published in the AM Best Insurance guide of A-VIII.
(a)
Workers compensation insurance in amounts sufficient pursuant to the
laws of the State of Washington;
(b)
Commercial general liability insurance with combined single limits of
liability not less than $5,000,000 for bodily injury, including personal injury or death,
products liability, contractual coverage, operations, explosion, collapse, underground and
property damage;
, 15 of26 pages
ORD#
(c)
Automobile liability insurance with combined single limits of liability not
less than $5,000,000 for bodily injury, including personal injury or death and property
damage; and
(d)
Employers liability insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000.
22.2
Mandatory Insurance Provisions. The comprehensive general liability insurance
and automobile liability insurance policies shall be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
(a)
The City, its officers, elected officials, employees, and volunteers are to be
named as additional insured;
(b)
Coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is
made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability;
Coverage shall not be suspended, canceled, modified or reduced except after thirty (30)
days prior written notice to the City delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested; and
Coverage shall be primary as to the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers.
Anyinsurance or self-insurance by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall
be in excess of Franchisee's required insurance.
22.3
Verification of Coverage. Franchisee shall furnish the City with certificates of
insurance evidencing the coverages required by this Section. The certificates shall be signed by
a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf and must be received and
approved by the City prior to the commencement of any work.
Section 23.
Bond
Before commencing work within the City, the Franchisee shall post a bond in the fonn
attached as Exhibit B and in the amount of $50,000 to guarantee per[onnance of the
construction, perfonnance, maintenance or repair in accordance with any pennits required and
with any provisions of this Franchise. Procedures for submission and release of the bond shall
ORD#
, 16 of26 pages
be as provided in FWCC Sections 22-146 and 22-175 or as otherwise provided in the City Code.
In the event that the Franchisee fails to perfonll as required herein or by any permits required, the
City may perform the work as provided herein, and may have recourse to the bond in addition to
or in lieu of the remedies provided herein, at the City's sole discretion. Franchisee shall be
entitled to return of the bond, or portion thereof, as remains sixty (60) days after the expiration or
termination of the Franchise, provided the City has not notified Franchisee of any actual or
potential damages incurred as a result of Franchisee's operations pursuant to the Franchise or as
a result of default thereunder.
Section 24.
Removal of Facilities
Upon the expiration, termination, or revocation of the rights granted under this Franchise,
the Franchisee shall remove all of its Facilities ftom the Franchise Area within 90 days of
receiving notice from the Public Works Director to do so. Provided, however, that the City may
permit the Facilities to be abandoned in place in such a manner as the City may prescribe. Upon
permanent abandonment, the Facilities shall become the property of the City.
Section 25.
Confidentiality
Subject to the limits of Washington law, City agrees to treat as confidential any records
that constitute proprietary or confidential information under federal or state law, to the extent
Franchisee makes City aware of such confidentiality. Franchisee is responsible for clearly and
conspicuously identifying the work confidential or proprietary, Franchisee will provide a brief
written explanation as to why such information is confidential and how it may be treated as such
under state or federal law. If City receives a demand from any person for disclosure of any
information designated by Franchisee as confidential, City consistent with applicable law will
advise Franchisee and provide Franchisee with a copy of any written request by the party
demanding access to such information.
If Franchisee believes that the disclosure of such
ORD#
, 17 of26 pages
documents by City would interfere with Franchisee's rights under federal or state law,
Franchisee will take appropriate legal aCtion to prevent the disclosure by City of such
documents.
Franchisee will join the person requesting the documents to such an action.
Franchisee will defend, indemnify and hold City hannless from any claim or judgment including
any penalties or costs under RCW 42.17.
Section 26.
Land Use Approvals/Reeulations. The parties acknowledge that this
Agreement sets forth the tenus and conditions under which the Franchisee may use and occupy
the public right-of-way within the City. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to or does modify
or affect the tenus and conditions of any existing or subsequently issued land use or construction
pennits or approvals (e.g., conditional use pennit, variance, building pennit, grading pennit,
electrical pennit, etc.). All such land use and/or construction pennits or approvals shall be
governed by the applicable City ordinances, rules and regulations in effect at the time Franchisee
submits a complete application for such permits and other approvals.
Section 27.
General Provisions
27.1
Entire Agreement. This Franchise contains all of the agreements of the City and
Franchisee with respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this Franchise and no prior
agreements or understandings pertaining to any such matters shall be effective for any purpose.
27.2
Modification. No provision of this Franchise may be amended or added to except
by agreement in writing signed by both City and Franchisee.
27.3
Assignment. In addition to the requirements of Subsection 2.1, a Franchisee shall
not have the right to transfer or assign, in whole or in part this Franchise without the prior written
consent of the City, which will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Franchisee shall have the right, without such notice or such
written consent, to assign this Franchise, in whole or part, to any parent, subsidiary, or affiliated
ORD#
, 18 of26 pages
corporation, or to an entity with or into which the Franchisee may merge or consolidate, or to
any entity resulting from the reorganization of the Franchisee or parent company, or to any
purchaser of all or substantially all of the assets of the Franchisee, or as part of any corporate
financing, reorganization, or refinancing, or to mortgage its rights, benefits and privileges in and
under this Franchise to the Trustee for its bondholders. Any transferee or assignee shall, within
thirty (30) days of the date of any approved transfer or assignment, file written notice of the
transfer or assignment with the City together with its written acceptance of all tenus and
conditions of this Franchise.
27.4
Attorney Fees. In the event the City or the Franchisee defaults in the perfonnance
of any terms in this Franchise, and the Franchisee or the City places the enforcement of the
Franchise or any part thereof or for the collection of any monies due, or to become due
hereunder, in the hands of an attorney, or files suit upon the same, the prevailing party shall be
entitled to an award of all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and expenses. The venue for any
dispute related to this Franchise shall be King County, Washington.
27.5
No Waiver. Failure of either party to declare any breach or default by the other
party immediately upon the occurrence thereof, or delay in taking any action in col111ection
therewith, shall not waive such breach or default, but such party shall have the right to declare
any such breach or default at any time. Failure of either party to declare one breach or default
does not act as a waiver of such party's right to declare another breach or default.
27.6
Governing Law. This Franchise shall be made in and shall be governed by and
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.
27.7
Authority. Each individual or entity executing this Franchise on behalf of the
City and Franchisee represents and waITants that such individual or entity is duly authorized to
execute and deliver this Franchise on behalf of the Franchisee or the City, respectively.
ORD#
, 19 of26 pages
27.8
Notices.
Any notices required to be given by the City to Franchisee or by
Franchisee to the City shall be delivered to the parties at the following addresses:
City:
City of Federal Way
Attn: City Attorney
33325 8th Avenue South
P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, W A 98063
)1'ranchisee:
New Cingular Wireless Lease
Administration
6100 Atlantic Boulevard, 1 st Floor
Mail Code: GAN02
Norcross, GA 30071
With Copy to:
Cingular Wireless
Real Estate Manager - PNW
RTC Building 3
16221 NE nnd Way
Redmond, W A 98052
And With Copy to:
Counsel - West Region
New Cingular Wireless
15 East Midland Avenue
Paramus, NJ 07652
Any notices may be delivered personally to the addressee of the notice or may be deposited
in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the address set forth herein. Any notice so posted
in the United States mail shall be deemed received three (3) days after the date of mailing.
27.9
Captions.
The respective captions of the sections and subsections of this
Franchise are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed to modify or
otherwise affect in any respect any of the provisions of this Franchise.
27.10 Remedies Cumulative.
Any remedies provided for under the tenus of this
Franchise are not intended to be exclusive but shall be cumulative with all other remedies
available to the City at law, in equity or by statute.
Section 28.
Severability
If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Franchise should be held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionaJity shall
ORD#
, 20 of 26 pages
not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
Franchise.
Section 29.
Ratification
Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this Franchise is
hereby ratified and affinned.
Section 30.
Effective Date
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from the time of its final passage,
as provided by law, provided it has been duly accepted by Franchisee as herein provided above.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this - day of
,2005.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, DEAN McCOLGAN
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.:
ACCEPT ANCE:
.-' 21 of 26 pages
ORD#
ACCEPTANCE
The undersigned hereby accepts all the rights and privileges of the above granted
Franchise and acknowledges that such rights and privileges are subject to and limited by all of
the tenus, conditions and obligations contained therein.
DATED this - day of
,2005.
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
By:
E. Don MacLeod
Executive Director of Network Services
K:\Telecom\Cingular FranchiselFinal 04,15.05
ORD#
, 22 of 26 pages
ORD#
, 23 of 26 pages
EXHIBIT A
TO BE PROVIDED
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PERFORMANCE BOND FOR
RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS:
undersigned
and the
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
and legally doing business in the State of Washington as a surety ("Surety"),
are held and firmly bound unto the City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation,
("City") in the penal sum of Dollars and noli 00 ($ )
for the payment of which we firmly bind ourselves and our legal representatives, heirs,
successors and assigns, jointly and severally.
We, the
("Principal")
undersigned
This obligation is entered into pursuant to the statutes of the State of Washington and the
ordinances, regulations, standards and policies of the City, as now existing or hereafter amended
or adopted.
The Principal has entered into an Agreement with the City dated
to
NOW, THEREFORE, if the P~ncipal shall perform all the provisions of the Agreement in the
manner and within the time period prescribed by the City, or within such extensions of time as
may be granted under the Agreement, and shall pay all laborers, mechanics, subcontractors and
material men or women, and all persons who shall supply the Principal or subcontractors with
provisions and supplies for the carrying on of said work, and shall hold the City, their officials,
agents, employees and volunteers hannless from any loss or damage occasioned to any person or
property by reason of any carelessness or negligence on the 'part of the Principal, or any
subcontractor in the perfonnance of said work, and shall indemnify and hold the City harmless
from any damage or expense by reason of failure of performance as specified in the Agreement,
or ftom defects appearing or developing in the material or workmanship provided or performed
under the Agreement within the period not less than:
1. the tern1 of the Agreement; or
2. two (2) years beyond the completion of final installation or construction by the Principal
pursuant to the Agreement if required by the City; whichever is longer,
then and in the event this obligation shall be void; but otherwise, it shall be and remain in full
force andeffecL
And the Surety, for value received, hereby further stipulates and agrees that no change, extension
of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed
thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligation on
üRD#
,24 of26 pages
this bond, and it docs hereby waive notice of any change, extension of time, alterations or
additions to the tenus of the Agreement or to the Work.
Within forty-five (45) days of receiving notice that the Principal has defaulted on aU or part of
the tenus of the Agreement, the Surety shall make a written commitment to the City that it will
either: (a) cure the default itself within a reasonable time period, or (b) tender to the City, the
amount necessary for the City to remedy the default, including legal fees incurred by the City, or
(c) in the event that Surety's evaluation of the dispute is not complete or in the event the Surety
disputes the City's claim of default, the Surety shall notify the City of its finding and its intent, if
any, to interplead. The Surety shall then fulfill its obligations under this bond, according to the
option it has elected. Should Surety elect option (a) to cure the default, the penal sum of the
Bond shall be reduced in an amount equal to the costs actually incurred by the Surety in curing
the default. If the Surety elects option (b), then upon completion of the necessary work, the City
shall notify the Surety of its actual costs. The City shal1 return, without interest, any
overpayment made by the Surety and the Surety shall pay to the City any actual costs which
exceed the City estimate, limited to the bond amount. Should the Surety elect option (c), the
Parties shall first complete participation in mediation, described in the below paragraph, prior to
any interplead action.
In the event a dispute should arise between the Parties to this Bond with respect to the City's
declaration of default by the Principal, the Parties agree to participate in at least four hours of
mediation in accordance with the mediation procedures of United States Arbitration and
Mediation ("USA&M"). The Parties shall proportionately share in the cost of the mediation.
The mediation shall be administered by the Seattle USA&M office, 4300 Two Union Square,
601 Union Street, Seattle, Washington 98101-2327. The Surety shall not interplead prior to
completion of the mediation.
DATED this - day of
,20_.
CORPORATE SEAL OF PRINCIPAL:
[PRINCIPAL]
By:
(Name of Person Executing Bond)
Its
"-
(Title)
---_._-~_.._.~
(Address)
(Phone)
, 25 of 26 pages
ORD#
CERTIFICATE AS TO CORPORATE SEAL
I hereby certify that I am the (Assistant) Secretary of the Corporation named as Principal in
the within bond; that , who signed the said bond on behalf of the
Principal, was of the said Corporation; that I know his or her
signature thereto is genuine, and that said bond was duly signed, sealed, and attested for and in
behalf of said Corporation by authority of its governing body-
---
Secretary or Assistant Secretary
CORPORATE SEAL OF SURETY:
[SURETY]
By:
Attorney-in-Fact
(Attach Power of Attorney)
(Name of Person Executing Bond)
~--
(Address)
...
(Phone)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Patricia A- Richardson, City Attorney
ORD#
, 26 of 26 pages
MEETING DATE:
/1
Mad, 2005
ITEM# -=12:' (~)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
Proposed Christian Faith Center Franchise
CATEGORY:
~ CONSENT
D RESOLUTION
D CITY COUNCIL BlJSINESS
BUDGET IMPACT:
lZJ ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$0.00
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum dated April 26, 2005 to the Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs
Committee, Proposed Franchise
.......................................................................""""""""""""""""""'........................... .".............
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND:
The basic terms ofthe proposed franchise are as fonows:
1. Equipment. The franchise would permit CFC to construct, maintain, repair, operate, and remove cable, voice,
data, mechanical, sprinkler and fire alarm conduits.
2. Consideration. CFC will pay the City's administrative costs and expenses in preparing and approving the
franchise and any permits. CFC will also relocate its facilities at the City's request, at CFC's cost, and repair any
damages it causes to the right-of-way, also at its own cost.
3. Insurance. CFC will maintain insurance of $5 Minion combined single limit for commercial general liability
and $5 Minion for automobile insurance.
4. Term. The term of the proposed franchise is 10 years, consistent with franchises the City has granted to
Olympic Pipeline, for pipeline maintenance; AT&T (now Comcast), for cable; Puget Sound Energy; Tacoma Public
Utilities; Weyerhaeuser, Sprint, Metromedia and Winiams (for fiber optic cable); AT&T Wireless Services and
Voice Stream (for wireless facilities).
5. Bond. The proposed franchise requires CFC to post a bond before commencing any work within the City to
guarantee performance of construction, maintenance or repair in accordance with any permits required by this Franchise.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed Franchise.
PROPOSED MOTION: "} move the proposed Franchise to second reading and approval at the next regular meeting on
May 17,2005"
CITY MANAGER APPROV AL:
~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
,,9 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
~. MOVE~ ~/. . SECOND READING (ordinances only)
5¡P¡os@
K:\AGNDITEM\2005\CFC Franchise
COUNCIL BILL #
1ST d"
rea 109
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
~iO5
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
April 26, 2005
TO:
pment and Regional Affairs Committee
FROM:
David H. Mo ley,.~ y
\/"1/
Karen KirkpatrickVJ)eputy City Attorney
VIA:
SUBJECT:
Proposed Christian Faith Center Franchise
Policy Issue
Should the City grant Christian Faith Center (CFC) a Franchise to construct, maintain, repair,
operate, and remove cable, voice, data, mechanical, sprinkler and fire alann conduits within
and through certain Rights-of-Way and streets within the City of Federal Way?
Background
Thc basic tenns of the proposed franchise are as follows:
1. Equipment. The franchise would permit CFC to construct cable, voice, data,
mechanical, sprinkler and fire alarm conduits under 20th A venue South which has not yet
been constructed but will be built by CFC, allowing CFC to connect its Sanctuary and School
Buildings together.
2. Consideration. CFC will pay the City's administrative costs and expenses in
preparing and approving the ftanchise and any pennits. CFC will also relocate its facilities
at the City's request, at CFC's cost, and repair any damages it causes to the right-of-way, also
at its own cost.
3. Insurance. CFC will maintain insurance of$5 Million combined single limit for
commercial general liability and $5 Million for automobile insurance.
4. Term. The tenn ofthe proposed franchise is 10 years, consistent with franchises
the City has granted to Olympic Pipeline, for pipeline maintenance; AT&T (now Comcast),
for cable; Puget Sound Energy; Tacoma Public Utilities; Weyerhaeuser, Sprint, Metromedia
and Williams (for fiber optic cable); AT&T Wireless Services and VoiceStream (for
wireless facilities).
V!
5. Bond. The proposed franchise requires CFC to post a bond before commencing
any work within the City to guarantee perfonnance of construction, maintenance or repair in
accordance with any pennits required by this Franchise.
Options
1. Recommend approval of the Ordinance and forward to the full council for first
reading at the May 3,2005 meeting.
2. Recommend rejection of the Ordinance.
3. Recommend modification of the Ordinance and forward to the full council for first
reading at the May 3, 2005 meeting.
Staff Recommendation
Approve the Ordinance and forward to the full council for first reading at the May 3, 2005
meeting. (Option 1)
Committee Recommendation
Forward option ì to the ful1 City Council for placement on the May 3,2005 City Council
Agenda for first reading with a "do pass" recommendation.
~
Committee Chair
K:\agnditem\fedrac\CFC ordinance
y2-
ORDINANCE NO.
DRAFT
i!~-?Ió-S:-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, GRANTING CHRISTIAN
FAITH CENTER A NONEXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO
OCCUpy RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF THE CITY 'oF FEDERAL
WAY, W ASIIINGTON, WITHIN THE SPECIFIED
FRANCHISE AREA TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN, REPAIR,
OPERATE, AND REMOVE CABLE, VOICE, DATA,
MECHANICAl" SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM CONDUITS
WITHIN AND THROUGH CERTAIN RIGHTS OF WAY AND
STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY.
WHEREAS, Christian Faith Center has requested a franchise from the City of Federal Way,
in order to construct, operate and maintain cable, voice, date, and mechanical conduits through
certain public rights-of-way, including 20th Avenue South; and
WHEREAS, 20th Avenue South has not yet been constructed but will be constructed by
Christian Faith Center ~nd will be dedicated to the City of Federal Way and the requirements ofthis
franchise agreement will take effect upon dedication of 20th Avenue South to the City of Federal
Way; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of Federal Way finds that it is in the public interest to grant
such a franchise, which will specify the rights and duties of Christian Faith Center; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.47.040 pennits the City of Federal Way to grant nonexclusive
franchises for the use of public streets, bridges or other public ways for, inter alia, conduits, wires
and appurtenances for transmission of signals and other methods of communications; and
,
WHEREAS, in granting such a nonexclusive franchise, the City of Federal Way reserves
such other powers and authorities granted to Washington code cities by gcnerallaw;
ORD#
,PAGEl
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Definitions
Where used in this Franchise the following tenns shall be defined as follows:
1.1
"City" means the City of Federal Way, Washington, a municipal corporation of the
State of Washington, and its respective successors and assigns.
. 1.2
"Council" means the City of Federal Way Council acting in its official capacity.
,1.3
"Director" means the Public Works Director, or designee, ofthe City of Federal Way
Public Works Department.
1.4
"Facilities" means Franchisee's equipment to be located within the public right-of-
way.
1.5
"FWCC" means the Federal Way City Code.
1.6
"Franchise Area" means only that portion of the 20TH Avenue South rights-of-way
located in the City of Federal Way and shown in Exhibit A.I, Exhibit A.2 and Exhibit A.3 attached
hereto, and/or any other areas approved by the Federal Way City Council and incorporated into this
Ordinance via amendment.
1.7
"franchisee" means Christian Faith Center, a Washinbrton non-profit corporation, and
its respective successors and assigns if consented to by the City of Federal Way as provided in
Section 24 herein.
Section 2.
Grant/Acceptance
2.1
Grant of Franchise.
The City hereby grants to Franchisee the nonexclusive right to enter upon the Franchise Area
for the limited purpose of constructing, excavating, installing, maintaining, restoring, and repairing
ORD#
,PAGE 2
Facilities within the Franchise Area. This franchise is specifically limited to the right for Franchisee
to install Facilities owned and operated by Franchisee. This franchise does not permit Franchisee to
lease, rent, or otherwise a\low use of conduits, space or capacity provided by the Facilities tQ other
third-party telecommunications providers, and Franchisee covenants and agrees that it will not do so.
2.2
Acceptance by Franchisee. Franchisee shall have no rights under this Franchise, nor
shall Franchisee be bound by the tenns and conditions of this Franchise, unless Franchisee shall,
within sixty (60) days after the effective date of this Franchise, file with the City its written
acceptance of this Franchise and all of its tenDS and conditions.
Section 3.
Non-Franchise Area City Property
This Franchise does not and shall not convey any right to Franchisee to install its Facilities
on, under, over, across, or to otherwise use City-owned or leased properties of any kind outside the
Franchise Area, or to install Facilities on, under, over, across or otherwise use any City owned or
leased property within the Franchise Area other than public roads, streets, avenues, alleys and
highways.
Section 4.
Term
Subject to Franchisee filing its acceptance pursuant to Subsection 2.2, the term of this
Franchise shall be for a period often (I 0) years commencing on the effective date ofthis Franchise,
unless tenninated earlier pursuant to this Franchise or other applicable law. At any time not more
than two (2) years nor less than one-hundred-eighty (180) days before the expiration of the Franchise
tenn either party may request a renewal of the Franchise for an additional ten (l0) year renewal
period.
Section 5.
Location of Facilities
5.1
Location. The Facilities permitted by this Franchise shall be installed underground.
ORD#
, PAGE 3
The location of the Facilities, including the underground Facilities and appurtenances, their depths
below surface of ground or grade of a right-of-way, and any related existing equipment to which the
Facilities are connected shall be depicted on a map and submitted to the City within thirty (30) days
of the installation of the Facilities. Upon written request of the City, Franchisee shall update such
map to reflect actual or anticipated improvements to the system. Any such map (or update thereof)
so submitted shall be for informational purposes only and shall not obligate Franchisee to undertake
anyspecific improvements, nor shall such map be construed as a proposal to undertake any specific
improvements.
5.2
GIS Data. At such time as Franchisee develops or employs Geographic Information
System ("GIS") technology, Franchisee shall submit the iníòrmation required in Subsection 5.1
above in digital GIS format, showing the location of its Facilities within the Franchise Area.
5.3
Design Markings. In the event the City desires to design new streets or intersections,
renovate existing streets, or make any other public improvements, Franchisee shall at the City of
Federal Way's reasonable request, provide the location of Franchisee's underground Facilities within
the Franchise Area by either field markings or by locating the Facilities on the City's design
drawings, and shall provide all other reasonable cooperation and assistance to the City.
Section 6.
Noninterference of Facilities
Franchisee agrees to maintain its Facilities and perform any and all activities authorized by
this Franchise: (l) so as not to unreasonably interfere with the free passage of traffic; (2) in
accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and City Code requirements, ftanchise
provisions, regulations, resolutions and rules, as now existing or as hereafter amended; and (3) as
required by the Director. This requirement applies whether or not the work is performed by the
Franchisee, its agents, employees, subcontractors, or other third parties at Franchisee's direction.
ORD#
, PAGE 4
Section 7.
Requirement to Obtain Permits
7.1
Pennits and Pennit Applications.
Franchisee shall, at its expense, obtain all pennits, (including rights-of-way permits), and pay
all pennit fees required by applicable City ordinances, regulations, resolutions and rules prior to
commencing any work within the Franchise Area. Franchisee pennit applications shall show the
position and location of the proposed facilities to be constructed, laid, installed, or erected at that
time, show -their relative position to existing rights-of-way or property lines upon prints drawn to
scale, designate rights-of-way by their names and improvements, such as, but not limited to, .
sidewalks, curbs, gutters, shoulders of roadway, ditches, paved roadways, roadways to property lines,
turnouts, parking strips, telephone or electric distribution poles, and water pipes existing on the
ground to be occupied, or as required by the Director. The Franchisee shall specifY the class and type
of materials to be used, equipment to be used, and mode of safeguarding and facilitating the public
traffic during construction. Materials and equipment shall be in new or like-new condition for its
type and kind. The manner of excavation, construction, installation, backfill, and temporary
structures such as, but not limited to, traffic turnouts and road obstructions shall meet the standards
ofthe FWCC and be satisfactory to the Director. All traffic control shall be in accordance with the
right-of-way pennit, and shall be in accordance with the Manual on Unifonn Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD). The Franchisee shall indicate on any permit application the time needed to complete the
work. The time needed to complete the work is subject to approyal by the City as a condition ofthe
issuance of the pennit or approval.
7.2
Emergency Exception to PernlÎt Requirement.
In the event of an emergency in which Franchisee's Facilities within the Franchise Area are in
a condition as to immediately endanger property, or the life, health or safety of any individual,
ORD # --------.-' PAGE 5
Franchisee may take action immediately to correct the dangerous condition without first obtaining
any required pennit so long as: (1) Franchisee infonns the City of nature and extent of the
emergency, and the work to be perfonned, prior to commencing the work; and (2) such pennit is
obtained by Franchisee as soon as practicable following cessation of the emergency.
Section 8.
Standard of Performance
The Franchisee shall not excavate for a distance of more than one hundred feet (100') without
immediately backfilling and compacting to surface grade and city standards. Backfilled trench areas
within a driving lane must be patched, either temporarily or pennanently, before the end of the work
day in which they have been opened. Trench areas within the right-of-way, but not within a driving
lane, must also be patched within the time limits specified by the City on the right -of-way use pennit.
Final surface restoration shall be completed within thirty (30) days and shall be equal to or better
than the surface condition prior to pennit issuance.
Any asphalt overlay completed within the Franchise Area during the five (5) year-period
immediately prior to the date of pennit application shall not be open cut by Franchisee unless
required by an emergency and subject to the provisions of Subsection 7.2 above. Franchisee shall
install new asphalt overlay on any street that is open cut, whether in an emergency or otherwise, for a
minimum of one (1) block (approximately 500 feet) in length in both directions from the open cut,
unless detennined otherwise by the Director.
Within fifteen (15) days of completion of any installation of Franchisee's Facilities within the
Franchise Area, Franchisee shall submit to the Director plans, stamped by a Professional Engineer
licensed by the State of Washington, showing the "as-built" location of the Facilities.
Section 9.
Survey Markers and Monuments
Franchisee shall, using a licensed surveyor, inunediately replace all markers or monuments
ORD#
, PAGE 6
disturbed during any work by Franchisee within the Franchise Area. Franchisee shall pay all costs
associated with such lost, destroyed or disturbed monuments or markers.
Section 10.
Surface Ma.-kio !s/Stakes
Prior to Franchisee conunencing any excavation work within the Franchise Area, Franchisee
shall reference all monuments and markers relating to subdivisions, plats, highways, and other
surveys. The reference points shall be located so that they shall not be disturbed during the
Franchisee's operations under this Franchise. The method of referencing these monuments or other
points shall be approved by the City before placement. The construction shall be made as
expeditiously as conditions penn it, and as directed by the City. The cost of monuments or other
markers lost, destroyed, or disturbed, and the expense of replacement of the monuments, shall be
borne solely by the Franchisee. A complete set of reference notes for monuments and other ties shall
be filed with the City.
Section 11.
Ril!ht of City to Complete Work
In the event Franchisee fails to comply with any applicable federal, state or City laws,
ordinances, rules, regulations or standards or with any of the terms of this Franchise, and such
noncompliance continues for a period often (10) days after Franchisee receives written notice from
the City regarding the noncompliance, the City may, but in no event is the City obligated to, order
any work completed, including without limitation Franchisee's obligation to repair pursuant to
Section 13 herein and Franchisee's obligation to remove or relocate facilities pursuant to Section 12
herein. If the City causes such work to be done by its own employees or by any person or entity
other than Franchisee, Franchisee shall, upon the City's written request, immediately reimburse the
City for all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City in having such work pcrfonned,
which costs may include the City's reasonable overhead expenses and attorneys fees. However, the
ORD#
, PAGE 7
City shall not have any electrical work accomplished by any person or entity other than Franchisee or
a qualified and licensed electrical contractor.
Section 12.
Req "ired Relocation of Facilities
12.1
City Reservation of Rights. The City reserves the right to use, occupy and enjoy all or
any part of the Franchise Area, either above, below, or adjacent to the Facilities, for any purpose that
is not inconsistent with the tenus and conditions of this Franchise. The rights reserved herein
include, without limitation, the constructiop., installation, and/or maintenance of any electrical, water,
sewer or stonn drainage line, traffic signals, street lights, trees, landscaping, bicycle paths and lanes,
equestrian trails, sidewalks, other pedestrian amenities, and other public street improvement projects.
This Franchise is not an exclusive Franchise and shall not be construed to in any manner
prohibit the City fTom granting other and further Franchises in, under, over, upon, and along the
Franchise Area, nor fTom exercising such other powers and authorities granted to the City by the
Washington State Constitution and general law.
12.2
City's Duties. In the event the City undertakes any work, including necessary
maintenance within a right~of-way in which Franchisee's facilities are located, and such work
necessitates the relocation of Franchisee's then existing Fad Iities within the Franclùse Area, the City
shall:
(a)
Provide written notice of the required relocation to Franchisee within a
reasonable time prior to the commencement of such City work; and
(b)
Provide Franchisee with copies of pertinent portions of the City's plans and
specifications so that Franchisee may relocate its Facilities to accommodate the City work.
Nothing in this section shall be construed as to relieve Franchisee of its duty and obligation Lo
relocate its Facilities, at Franchisee's sole cost, for any improvement project undertaken by, or on
ORD#
, PAGE 8
behalf of, the City in the interest of public health, safety, welfare, necessity or convenience, as
adjudged in the sole discretion of the City.
12.3
Franchisee's Duties. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of the City notice under
Subsection 12.2(a) requiring relocation and receipt of the plans and specifications pursuant to
Subsection 12.2(b), Franchisee shall raise, lower, or move such Facilities within the Franchise Area
at its sole cost and expense. to the location or position directed by the City, to cause the least
interference with the improvement, repair, or alteration contemplated by the City and to confoml to
such new grades as may be established. Ifthe City improves a right-of-way, Franchisee shall, at its
sole cost and expense, upon receipt of notice, replace the Facilities located in the improved subgrade
ofthe improvement with substitute Facilìties confonning to the specifications for the improvement
of the right-of-way.
12.4
The provisions 0 f this Section shall in no manner preclude or restrict the Franchisee
from making any arrangements it may deem appropriate when responding to a request for relocation
of its Facilities by any person or entity other than the City, where the Facilities to be constructed by
said person or entity are not or will not become City-owned, operated or maintained Facilities;
provided that such arrangements do not unreasonably delay a City improvement project.
Section 13.
Dama2;e Repair
In case of damage by the Franchisee, its agents or employees or by the Facilities of the
Franchisee to rights-of-way, or to public and private improvements within or adjacent to rights-of-
way, the Franchisee agrees to repair the damage at its own cost and expense.. The Franchisee shall,
upon discovery of any such damage, immediately notify the City. The City will inspect the damage,
and set a time limit for completion of the repair. If the City discovers damage caused by the
Franchisee to rights-of-way, or to public and private improvements within or adjacent to rights-of-
ORD#
, PAGE 9
way, the City shall give the Franchisee notice of the damage and set a time limit in which the
Franchisee must repair the damage. In the event the Franchisee does not repair a right-of-way or an
improvement as required in this section, the City may repair the damage pursuant to Section 11 of
this Agreement.
Section 14.
Default
14.1
Notice of Default. In addition to other remedies set forth herein, if Franchisee shall
fail to comply with any of the provisions of this Franchise, the City may serve a written notice to
Franchisee ordering such compliance and Franchisee shall have sixty (60) days from the receipt of
such notice in which to comply.
14.2
Revocation of Franchise. If Franchisee is notin compliance with this Franchise after
the expiration of the sixty (60) day period, the City may, by resolution, declare the franchise
immediately revoked.
Section 15.
Limited Ri2hts
This Franchise is intended to convey only a limited right and interest to Franchisee in. the
Franchise Area. This Franchise is not a waITanty of title or conveyance 0 f any ownership interest in
or to the Franchise Area to Franchisee.
Section 16.
Eminent Domain
The existence ofthis Franchise shall not preclude the City from acquiring by condemnation,
in accordance with applicable law, all or a portion of Franchisees Facilities within the Franchise Area
for the fair market value thereof. In determining the value of such Facilities, no value shall be
attributed to the right to occupy the Area conferred by this Franchise.
Section 17.
Vacation
If at any time the City, by ordinance, vacates all or any portion ofthe Franchise Area, the City
ORD#
,PAGE 10
will not be liable for any damages or loss to the Franchisee byreason of such vacation. The City shall
notify Franchisee in writing not less than 30 days before vacating all or any portion ofthe Franchise
Area. The City may, after thirty (30) days written notice to Franchisee, tenninate this Franchise with
respect to any such vacated area.
Section 18.
Compliance with Laws
18.1
General. Franchisee shall comply with all applicable federal, state and City laws,
franchises, resolutions, regulations, standards, policies and procedures, as now existing or hereafter
amended or adopted, including without limitation the State Environmental Policy Act; provided,
however, that if any tenn or condition 0 f this Franchise and any tenn or condition of any City law,
code, franchise, resolution, regulation, standard, procedure, permit or approval are in conflict, the
tenn or condition of this Franchise will control.
18.2
Future City of Federal Way Regulation. Franchisee acknowledges that the City may
develop rules, regulations, ordinances and specifications for the use ofthe right-of-way which shall
govern Franchisee's Facilities and activities hereunder 8,.<; if they were in effect at the time this
Franchise was executed by the City and Franchisee covenants and agrees to be bound by same.
Section 19.
Guarantee
Franchisee shall guarantee work completed by the Franchisee under this Franchise for a
period of 10 years against settlement or repair.
Section 20.
Chan!e for Administrative Costs
Franchisee agrees to pay a fee or a charge to recover the actual reasonable administrative
expenses incurred by the City that are directly related to preparing and approving this Franchise.
Nothing herein shall preclude the City from charging adminÏstrative fees or recovering any
administrative costs incurred by the City in the approval of pennils or in the supervision, inspection
ORD#
, PAGE II
or examination of all work by Franchisee in the Franchise Area as prescribed in accordance with
applicable provisions of the Federal Way City Code.
Section 21.
Indemnification
Franchisee agrees to indemnify and hold hannless and defend the City, its elected officials,
officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and
liabilities (including costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, including,
without limitation, their respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising from, resulting from,
or connected with this Franchise to the extent caused in part or in whole by the acts, errors or
omissions of the Franchisee, its officers, partners, shareholders, agents, employees, or by the
Franchisee's breach of any provisions ofthis Franchise; provided, however, that this section shall not
be construed as requiring Franchisee to indemnify, hold harmless or defend the City against claims or
damages arising from the negligence of the City, its agents or employees. In the event any claim,
demand, suit or action is commenced against the City that gives rise to Franchisee's obligation
pursuantto this Section 21, the City shall promptly notifY Franchisee thereot: Franchisee's selection
of an attorney to defend any such claim, demand, suit or action shall be subject to the City's
approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Franchisee shall not settle or compromise any
such suit or action except with prior written consent of the City, which shall not be unreasonably
withheld. The City shall have the right at all times to participate through its own attorney in any suit
or action which arises pursuant to this Franchise when the City determines that such participation is
required to protect the interest of the City or the public. In the event it is determined that RCW
4.24.115 applies to this Franchise, Franchisee agrees to defend, hold harmless and indemnify the
City to the maximum extent permitted thereunder, to the full extent of Franchisee's negligence.
ORD#
~_.._--' PAGE 12
Section 22.
Insurance
22.1
Minimum Limits. The Franchisee agrees to carry as a minimum, the following
insurance, in such fonns and with such carriers as are satisfactory to the City.
(a)
Workers compensation and employer's liability ll1surance in amounts
sufficient pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington;
(b)
ConunerciaI general liability insurance with combined single limits ofliability
not less than $5,000,000 for bodily injury, including personal injury or death, products
liability, contractual coverage, operations, explosion, collapse, underground and property
damage; and
(c)
Automobile liability insurance with combined single limits of liability not less
than $5,000,000 for bodily injury, including personal injury or death and property damage.
22.2
Mandatory Insurance Provisions. The comprehensive general liability insurance and
automobile liability insurance policies shall be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
(a)
The City, its officers, elected officials, employees, and volunteers are to be
named as additional insured;
(b)
Coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made
or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits 0 f the insurer's liability;
Coverage shall not be suspended, canceled, modified or reduced except after thirty (30) days
prior written notice to the City delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested; and Coverage
shall be primary as to the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or
self-insurance by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of
Franchisee's required insurance.
ORD#
,PAGEI3
22.3
Yerification of Coverage. Franchisee shall furnish the City with certificates of
insurance and original endorsements evidencing the coverages required by this Section. The
certificates and endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage
on its behalf and must be received and approved by the City prior to the commencement of any work.
At the City's request; Franchisee shall deliver certified copies of all required insurance policies.
Section 23.
Bond
Franchisee shall post a bond before commencing any work within the City to guarantee
perfonnance of construction, maintenance or repair in accordance with any pennits required by this
Franchise. Procedures for submission and release of the bond shall be as provided in FWCC
Sections 22-146 and 22-175 or as otherwise provided in the City Code. In the event that the
Franchisee fails to perfonn as required herein or by any pcnnits required, the City may perfoffil the
work as provided herein, and may have recourse to the bond in addition to or in lieu ofthe remedies
provided herein, at the City's sole discretion.
Section 24.
General Provisions
24.1
Entire Agreement. This Franchise contains all of the agreements ofthe Parties with
respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this Franchise and no prior agreements or
understandings pertaining to any such matters shall be effective for any purpose.
24.2
Modification. No provision ofthis Franchise may be amended or added to except by
agreement in writing signed by both of the Parties.
24.3
Assigrunent. Franchisee shall not have the right to transfer or assign, in whole or in
part, any or all of its obligations and rights hereunder without the prior written consent ofthe City.
Any assignee shall, within thirty (30) days ofthe date of any approved assignment, tìIe written
notice ofthe assignment with the City together with its written acceptance of all terms and conditions
ORD ff
,PAGE 14
ofthis Franchise. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Franchisee shall have the right, without such notice
or such written consent, to mortgage its rights, benefits and privileges in and under this Franchise to
the Trustee for its bondholders.
24.4
Attorney Fees. In the event the City or the Franchisee defaults on the perfonuancc of
any tenus in this Franchise, and the Franchisee or the City places the enforcement of the Franchise or
any part thereof or for the collection of any monies due, or to become due hereunder, in the hands of
an attorney, or files suit upon the same, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of all
reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and expenses. The venue for any dispute related to this Franchise
shall be King County, Washington.
24.5
No W ai ver. Failure of either party to declare any breach or default by the other party
immediately upon the occurrence thereof, or delay in taking any action in connection therewith, shall
not waive such breach or default, but such party shall have the right to declare any such breach or
default at any time. Failure of either party to declare one breach or default does not act as a waiver of
such party's right to declare another breach or default.
24.6
Governing Law. This Franchise shall be made in and shall be governed by and
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.
24.7
Authority. Each individual executing this Franchise on behalf of the City and
Franchisee represents and warrants that such individual is duly authorized to execute and deliver this
Franchise on behalf of the Franchisee or the City.
24.8
Notices. Any notices required to be given by the City to Franchisee or by Franchisee
to the City shall be delivered to the parties at the following addresses:
ORD#
-~~-' PAGE 15
Franchisee:
Christian Faith Center
Attn: Ellen Kenison
PO Box 98600
Seattle, W A 981 98
City:
City of Federal Way
Attn: City Attorney
33325 8th Avenue South
P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way,W A 98063
Any notices may be delivered personally to the addressee of the notice or may be deposited in
the United States.mail, postage prepaid, to the address set forth herein. Any notice so posted in the
United States mail shall be deemed received three (3) days after the date of mailing.
24.9
Captions. The respective captions of the sections of this Franchise are inserted for
convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed to modify or otherwise affect in any respect
any of the provisions of this Franchise.
24.10 Remedies Cumulative. Any remedies provided for under the tenus ofthis Franchise
are not intended to be exclusive but shall be cumulative with all other remedies available to the City
at law, in equity or by statute.
Section 25.
Severability
If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Franchise should be held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not
affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
Franchise.
Section 26.
Ratification
Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date ofthis Franchise is hereby
ratified and affirmed.
Section 27.
Effective Date
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from the time of its final passage, as
ORD#
-..' PAGE 16
provided by law, provided it has been duly accepted by Franchisee as herein provided above.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this -- day of
,2°-
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, DEAN MCCOLGAN
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.:
ACCEPT ANCE:
ORD # ~-_._---""--"-~, PAGE 17
ACCEPT ANCE:
The undersigned hereby accepts all the rights and privileges ofthe above granted License and
acknowledges that such rights and privileges are subject to and limited by aU ofthe tenns, conditions
and obligations contained therein.
DATED this - day of
,2005.
CHRISTIAN F AfTH CENTER
By: Casey Treat
Its: President
K:\CFC\Franchise\franchise Fedrac 4.26.05
ORD#
,PAGE 18
Q
----".'-"
.. ... -' :.' . " . . -...'" - ",',",
AVENUE
--
0
'"
~
roe
-c-
(;)zr
I 0
-i-iz
t}Ç)
Q
,- I
"'O,-,"
""""""'"
",""""
õIGNEO BY"," H-
'El.OPMENT REVIEW. 0;0 H-
OOVED BY:""""""
FTeDBY:--
AbbeyRoad
,,(J)
ofTl
:::tJfTl
pfTlfT1
:::tJZ~
fT1r-
ppg:!
:::tJ-i
C)
[TI»
ON
(/)
0
I
a
(J)O
OJPI
ez
-op
'-ie
OeD
z»-
ø:::tJ-i
-<§6
e
~
"'-..
0
\)
.
\'J
OJ{/)
Co
II
00
Zo
(;)1
0
0 p
Z "U
Z "U
.......... fT1 a :::tJ
(;)0,,0
:::tJ -i x
00"3::
I z:::tJ»
Z »-i
fT1 -i Z fTl
00
!-H œI5
oc(J)o
"---' -'- fTl »
I -i
0 -
- 0
z Z
G1
Abbey Road Group LLC
Land Development Company
"'"
Christian Faith Center
""Ii'"""",
:Ø':....
P.O. !!<,>x2Dr
P~~;vyA9ß3r1
I
~
j
"U
;:u
a
""U
a
(I)
m
CJ
~
m
:z
2
."
a
;:u
0
a
:z
CJ
c:
~
(/)0
m:J:
9:::0
~C/)
~~~
~. Z
~ ~"
~:z»
t; ;a. -;
~G):r:
mf1l0
. >om
J"z
~" -;
.m
:;;:;:0
...
j"-'
g.S!
~~
j::!'-'
rn
(')
~.'~
<:>
a
- .
Christian Faith Center
Conduit Plan View
Ëxhibit A.1
fø~,talW.aYi \'(A
;g~5~
o~o~
::s;;?~..
0 0
gJ»z>
UJ ()
-11-12
°wO>
-ISWr
:rr(Tlc
fTl-l»:::I
(')ooc
~~é:<!
. ::.EUI
z¡; 5:J
~oÇ2
UlZ(')
:J: :r
>:i!
F(Tl
w
(Tl
,,".,.,..
3IONED ."'GiI-"""
.a.oPMENT """'lOW GO ...........,
'I!n\I&I BY, '" ..-
IAEOBY,-"""""
"'.......,..,.
OET,^"
<.n-U
-;;0
00
fTl-U
. ft>
:E-u
,.-.. ~ ;;0
~;;o~
vc~
20
fTl
<.nc
'lfTl:::l
OfTlC
::O<.n-i
<.nI-<
fT1fTl-i
()fTl;;o
:;:j-ifTl
0>2
2.0
(NI
--
IV'
""'""
Abbey Road Group LLC
Land Development Company
me
TInE
Christian Faith Center
Christian Faith Center
Conduit Plan View
Exhibit A.2
Abbey Road
P.Ò. Box2U7
Puy.IIu~. WA 98371
b
.
(J)C)
mI
p;:u
""c/)
:l-l
0 ~»
~:-cZ
g ~ ïI
ci 2. »
5:'-
-:::D -I
!!.¡m:I
!'TIC)
.þ.m
.!T'z
~-I
-m
:5:;:0
Q
...~
... ~
s-"-"
g.5! ::r:
~ã -
""°
0 UJ
~...... (j
~F:
;I:j
- .
Fe<I"!$l VVaY. Wf\
COODUITS PROVIDED:
A:. MECHANICAL; 1 EACH X 1 1/28 DIAMETER
B: vaCE DATA/VIDE<k 6 EACH X 4. DIAMElER (REFER TO SHEET aD)
C: ARE Ai.ARtII: 1 EAQI X 1 1 fi' DIAMElER
D: SPRINKlER CONTROl: 1 EACH X 1 1/t' DlAMElER
E: SECURITY: 1 EACH X 1 1/t' DIANETER
'00 SPARE CONDUITS
CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER
SEC. 21/TWP. 21 N.lRGE. 4E" W.M
CONDUIT SECTION
PROPOSED TRENCH SECTION BETWEEN
SANCTUARY AND SCHOOL BUILDlNGS
w
'"
<
Ct:
~
0
()
x
«
::æ
---
--------
in
N
10
---
AO
Co
0
0
2. DIAMETER
LIGHTING CONDUIT
-----
0
0
DO
NOTES:
*TYPICAl.. CONDUIT SPACING 2"TO
~ SEPARATION.
*AC1UAl DlWENSIQNS AND DEPlHS TO
BE COORDINA'IED IN lHE FnD
/' F1NISHED GRADE
--
Ct:w
~9::
w(l.
::æ
<::æ
-0:::
°0
= ¡.;;..
N(J)
.....
ASPHALT CONCRETE
PAVEMENT 4. DEPTH
TOP COURSE
28 DEPTH
BASE COURSE
68 DEPTH
MINIMUM 128
SEPARA110N REQUIRED
0
0
5' (APPROXIMATE) TRENCH
EO
~ I~
18. 1 f
s ==
- OJ
c5
ðl:M
=.2<
'æ õ;!:'
u.Q).o
1:(f):2
('C ;!:' ><
ïi!-èLU
'I: ~
.c: 0
uU
~
,.:;
~
~
-g
u..'
[
...
.æ
I:
OJ
U
:5
'æ
IJ..
c
!I:I
~
!J
'c
.c:
U
~
;::
~ i
Š ~
~f
i
>-
u 16 ;:: m
::! E" .0: ~ 'òï"
0 WN~'
g. U 5 i~ :!.
e ë !J ..o: %¡;J
(!) Q) $!~-~
'0 E ~o..'l~
:§g, :;,0..,
CCQi ~ ~ ~-8!
~ ,~, ffJ ~Ä!
.0 c¡:¡o..à5~
.0'0 ø OM"
« I: ,.,
('C 0.. ,N
...J
I.,
~
~
~:
J
Ii II
~~~I~
i II~ ~ ~
MEETING DATE:
May 17,2005
ITEM#
YCf)
......."............""",'..""",
m.m_mm_m.m...._mm_mm.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
Purchase 2 Police Pool Vehicles for Commanders Emergency Response
""m""""""""""""""""
mm'_'_..._m_._m._m_mmmm.._..m.m._...,-. ..............
............................................,...................................................."..................."....................
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
x
D
D
CONSENT
RESOLUTION
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
..___mmmm_.".."""""""""""'" m...._m"""_._m._m_..m"""""""""""""""""""..""m"m__mm._m._..m.._m,_"""..............,,....................m
..............."""..............................................................""...............".."......"",,"""""""""'"
ATTACHMENTS: Staff memorandum to FEDRAC at their May 10th and April 26, 2005 regular meeting.
,.mmmm...mmm..m..mmm",'" """"""....,."....... mmm..mm""""""""'""""""""",..m"mm'_'_"_---"-"mm....-......
SUMMARY /BA CK GROUND:
mm._m____._............_._mmm.._._mm.
"""-"'.__..._m""""-'..m.
Since its forination, the Public Safety Department has undergone a number of organizational changes in which duties normally taken
on by officers have been transferred to civilians in the department. Because of these changes, the availability of unmarked vehicles
for business use is very limited. Therefore, the Department is requesting two unmarked vehicles. During nonnal working hours, the
vehicles would be used by the Public Safety Department on an as needed basis. Police Commanders would also be allowed to take the
vehicles home in order to respond to emergency calls during after hours.
After the Committee approved the addition, staff solicited bids from auto dealers in the area for 2 Ford 500s, and received 3 bids.
Pacific Coast Ford in Federal Way submitted the lowest bid for a total of $43,858.20, including sales tax.
"""""""""""""""'" mm.__._m"-'mm..__.._mm_._..'m""""""""""""""""""""""""""'---__m'-mmm.___"_"._"""""""""""
mm._"m'-"m._m_mmm._mm.m_"_"'_'--"""""_m.m_._mm...._........,,...... """,..-.....m.........................."..."..............""..".........
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: FEDRAC recommends that full Council approve the addition of
2 unmarked police vehicles and acceptance of the low bid.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to approve the addition of 2 unmarked police vehicles and award the bid to Pacific Coast Ford
for the amount of $43,858.20."
~ANAGERAPP~ ~.. ----
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
m...._.._...._.___m_mm.._mm_._mm'__"_"----"-_mmm.._m_mm.
COUNCIL ACTION:
0
D
0
0
APPROVED
DENIED
T ABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION
MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/10/2001
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
May 5, 2005
Finance, Economic D.evelopme~RegiOnal Affairs Committee
David H. Moseley, City Manage~ ~ ~ Å - \
Iwen Wang, Management Services Director YV\..J
Bid Acceptance for the 2 New Police Pool Vehicles
Via:
From:
Su~ject:
BACKGROUND:
Committee has prcviously approved the acquisition of two additional unmarkcd policc vehicles. Staff
solicited bids for two Ford 500s; the following are the bids received:
Bidder Bill Pierre Ford Pacific Cost Ford Titus Will Ford
Unit Pricc $20,840.00 $20,100.00 $20,593.00
x2 $41,680.00 $40,200.00 $41,186.00
Sales Tax 9.1 % 3,792.88 3,658.20 3,747.93
Grand Total $45,472.88 $43,858.20 $44,933.93
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommcnds that Council approve and award the bid for two Ford 500s submitted by Pacitìc Coast
Ford in the amount of $43,858.20.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Forward the addition of two police pool vehicles and bid results to full Council at the May 17,2005
mceting for approval.
cR~,~ A-1~OMMITTEE:
ommittee Chair
k:lfedracI200510510IcarS,doc
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
Via:
April 22, 2005
Finance, Economic e elopmcnt and Regional Affairs Committee
David H. Mo Ie it Nfanager
Iwen Wang, Management Services Director ~
Add 2 Police Pool Vehiclesfbr Commanders Emergency Response
From:
Su~iect:
POLICY QUESTION:
Should the City add 2 police pool vehicles that would also be used for commanders in an emergency
response?
BACKGROUND:
Since its fÒrmation, the Public Safety Department has been authorized to maintain 19 unmarked vehicles
for non-uniform assignments, administrative functions, and support services for the department. Since
then there have been many changes; including transferring a number of functions (such as those of the
Public Information Officer) from commissioned officer to civilian. We have not adjusted the number of
unmarked vehicles to accommodate these changes and the availability of unmarked vehicles for city
business use is very limited.
'fhe Department is requesting to add two unmarked vehicles, which would be available for all of its
needs. Commanders would be able to take them home after work, allowing them to respond to
emergency calls.
The Department has identified replacement reserves on old equipment that will no longer be needed in
the future. These reserves will serve as a funding source for the initial purchase of the vehicles. On~
going maintenance/operations will be funded using traffic school revenue currently in the budget.
Therefore, no impact on the General Fund is expected at this time.
STAFF RECOMMENDA TION:
Staff recommends that Council approve the addition of2 unmarked vehicles and direct staff to proceed
with the request for bid.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Forward the staff recommendation to full Council at the May 17,2005 meeting for approval.
Committee Chair
,""
k: \lhlrac\200 5\04 26\cars. doc
PI
MEETING DATE:
May 17,2005
ITEM# ICj)
..........................-",..-",---------------,-,_.................-,
...._....,_...............~......."......,,_m___m________mm_m....
.......................................................................",..............
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
Amend 2005 CDBG Project for Senior Nutrition & Health Improvements/New Community Center
...._m.._m__.._mm_m_""m................................................~....m___.._mmm_mmmm.._m_"......""'""""
..-......m"..____-~-_.._____mm_.._m____.._-"""'-""""""""""""""..........,......................
..,...."....... ..---"...... ..m..,,-..-__m__m__m__m.._m___m_m
mm__mmm~~____mm~_m___mm
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMP ACT:
IZJ
0
0
CONSENT
RESOLUTION
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
mm__""".........................................................."....mmm_mm_mm__.._-__..m..
mm__m__..___mm______m.._m_m
................................................................,..............................................................................................
A TT ACHMENTS: Memorandum to the Parks, Recreation Human Services, and Public Safety Committee dated May 2,
2005 with attachments.
......................,........,..,-",
mm__-..--..______m__mm_....___.."m ............""",........,...."""".."",........
mm__m__mmm.._mmmm_m___....m
mm_~_..___m....__mm-
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The 2005 CDBG program funded the Federal Way Community Center for
improvements to the kitchen and health areas of the facility that would specifically benefit seniors. The final award to the
project was $89,825. The project funded will not be completed within the King County CDBG Consortium guidelines.
The proposed amendment would use the 2005 CDBG funds awarded to the project to pay for development costs of the
community center in proportion to the amount of the facility that will be used by seniors rather than the construction costs
originally funded. The Parks and Recreation Department anticipates thatthey will re-apply for 2006 CDBG funds for the
construction phase of the improvements for seniors at the Federal Way Community Center.
"",......................"",.."""
.."m"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""...,............................
..............................................................".......,.....................
...................,.."'.."'"............................'"
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its May 9, 2005 meeting, the PRHS&PS Committee
forwarded the following Human Services Commission recommendation: Amend the 2005 CDBG award for project
C05027, in the amount of$89,825, for Senior Nutrition and Health Improvements for the new Federal Way Community
Center, in the vicinity of 1095 S 324th St, Federal Way, to pay for the CDBG eligible development costs including, but not
limited to: pennitting, project management, environmental review, and bidding expenses for the portion of the federal
Way Community Center benefitting enior citizens rather than the construction costs for senior improvements originally
proposed.
.............................................................................................................."....... ..m.._~___---_.._--~--______mm_____"""""""""""""""""" .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
PROPOSED MOTION: I move to amend the 2005 CDBG award for project CO5027, in the amount of $89,825, for
Senior Nutrition and Health Improvements for the new Federal Way Community Center, in the vicinity of 1095 S 324th
St, Federal Way, to pay for the CDBG eligible development costs including, but not limited to: pennitting, project
management, environmental review, and bidding expenses for the portion of the Federal Way Community Center
benefitting senior citizens rather than the construction costs for senior improvements originally proposed.
~;;o~-~-~-------
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
D APPROVED
D DENIED
D T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED ~ 05110/2001
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES; AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
Date:
From:
Via:
Subject:
May 2, 2005
Kelli O'Donn CD G coordinato~
David Mosele anager
Amend 2005 BG Allocation to Federal Way Community Center for Senior
Nutrition & Health Improvement Project
Policy Question:
Should the 2005 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) allocation of $89;825 to the
Federal Way Community Center for Senior Nutrition & Health Improvement Project be
amended to pay for development costs such as permitting, mitigation fees and project
management for the portion of the facility that will benefit seniors?
Backaround:
The City of Federal Way allocated $97,278 of 2005 CDBG funds for improvements to the
new Federal Way Community Center that would specifically benefit seniors. The project was
reduced to $89,825 after the final 2005 allocations to CDBG were passed by Congress. The
original application was for the purchase and installation of kitchen and health equipment that
would be used by seniors using the new facility. The improvements would have transferred
and expanded the services currently available to seniors at the Klahanee Lake Community
Center to the larger new facility. At the time of application, it was anticipated that the new
Community Center would be completed in October of 2006. Since application, the schedule
for the project has been revised and the Community Center is not scheduled to be completed
until December 2006. .. ;.
Each November, entitlement communities are evaluated by the US Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD) on timeliness of expenditures. An entitlement must have
less than 1.5 times the amount of their annual entitlement in their line of credit to pass the
"timeliness" test. When entitlements fail this test and are found to be "untimely" in spending
CDBG funds, HUD may impose sanctions including reducing the next allocation by 30% of
the amount the entitlement is over the 1.5 limit. The Consortium failed the timeliness test in
2003 and barely met the test in November of 2004. As part of the Consortium's workout plan
with HUD, the Consortium reduced the amount of time capital projects have to be completed
t017 months from the start of the program year that funds were awarded; which would be
May 2006 for the Senior Improvements. The prior policy allowed two years and extensions
were frequently granted. While it maybe possible to receive an extension, it is unlikely that
the Joint Recommendation Committee (JRC) would be in favor of delaying the expenditure of
2005 CDBG funds until late 2006 due to the recent history of the Consortium in not spending
CDBG funds within the HUD requirements.
Since the project will not be completed within the Consortium policies, funds from this project
should be allocated to a project that can utilize the funds by May of 2006. The projec~ could
be canceled and funds re-allocated per the 2005 CDBG Contingency Plan (Attachment 1).
The Federal Way Housing Repair Program isthe first priority for additional 2005 CDBG
capital funds up to $87,815. The remaining $2,010 would go to the Pediatric Interim Care
Center (PICC) Newborn Nursery as the second priority. If the PICC project is complete, the
$2,010 would be allocated to the Boys and Girls Club of King County Youth Development
Center as the third priority. Council action and a 14 day public comment period would be
required to cancel the project and reallocate the funds per the 2005 Contingency Plan.
As an alternative to canceling the project, the project could be amended to pay for the
development costs of the project in proportion to the percentage of the project that would
benefit senior citizens. Staff is working to idéntify the portions of the building that will be
utilized by seniors and estimates that 9.6% of the facility would serve seniors and be eligible
for CDBG funds. The Parks'and Recreation staff has identified approximately $76,000 in
eligible development costs (Attachment 2). The amended project would not require
extensive environmental review because it is considered an exempt activity in regard to
CDBG. Should the Commission and Council concur to amend the project $500 should be
budgeted for CDBG environmental review.
It is also expected that an application for 2006 capital funds will be submitted for the Senior
Nutrition and Health Improvements for construction of the kitchen and other improvements
benefiting seniors as phase 2 of the project. Construction projects require a full '
environmental review. It is expected that an extensive environmental review process would
be required for construction of Senior Improvements since the Community Center property
has wetlands on the site. Environmental review of a phase 2 construction project would have
an estimated cost of $5,000. A tiered environmental review of the Community Center Senior
Improvements project may be included in the amended budget. The environmental review of
phase 2 would not be completed until the Council approves the 2006 CDBG capital' EO
allocations. This would enable the environmental review of the construction phasè of thei
CDBG project to begin prioLto the 2006 fund year so that the Senior IhiprovementsþrQject:
would not be delayed in 20013,' .'" '. . :, "("'i)!~ if-,
"
;, . ,,'I
The total development costs identified with tiered environmental review would total $81;500.
The remaining $8,325 could be budgeted for contingencies should additional eligible
developme,nt expenses be identified and/or environmental review costs exceed the projected
budget. Council action to amend the project with a 14 day public comment period are
required should the Commission and Council concur to utilize 2005 CDBG funds for
development costs of the project for the portion of the facility serving seniors. Additional
information may be presented at the Council Committee meeting on eligible costs for the
amended project.
\,
',., <'
Options:.. '
1. Amend the 2005 CDBG award for project C05027, in the amount of $89,825, for
Senior Nutrition and Health Equipment for the new Federal Way Community Center; in
the vicinity of 1095 S 324th St., Federal Way, to pay for the CDBGeligible
development costs including, but not limited to: permitting, project management,
environmental review, and bidding expenses for the portion of the Federal Way
Community Center benefiting senior citizens rather than for the construction costs for
senior improvements originally proposed;
AdvantaQes:
. Allocates CDBG funds to benefit senior citizens that will utilize the new Federal Way
Community Center on a project that is underway;
. Provides a mechanism to complete environmental review of a 2006 CDBG
construction project as the second phase of the Senior Nutrition and Health
Equipment for the new Federal Way Community Center, which will assist with
timely expenditure of Federal Way CDBG funds;
Disadvantaaes:
. Changes to the King County CDBG Consortium may limit the number of capital
projects that can be funded by Federal Way alone in 2006. If the Commission and
CounciJ choose to fund the construction phase of the Senior Improvements to the
Community Center, there may not be CDBG funds available for other capital
projects serving Federal Way exclusively;
2.
Cancel the 2005 CDBG award for project C05027, in the amount of $89,825, for
Senior Nutrition and Health Equipment for the new Federal Way Community Center
and consider funding construction of the project as part of the 2006 CDBG capital
allocation process; and, award the funds per the 2005 CDBG Contingency Plan.
Advantaaes:
. Provides additional funding for housing repair to Federal Way residents and capital
projects approved in the 2005 CDBG allocation process; .
Disadvantaaes:
. Limits the amount of CDBG funding available to support the Senior Nutrition and
Health Equipment for the new Federal Way Community Center to construction
costs;
. Staff Recommendation:
S~affrecommends Option 1 because the new Community Center will b~nefitFederal Way
seniors withexpallded services. ; '" J.. ":1'"
Commission Recommendation '. .
The Human Services Commission voted unanimously on April 18, 2005; to folWard option 1
to the Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Committee for recommendation
to the full Council.
Committee Recommendation
FolWard option -1- to the full City Council for consideration at the May 17, 2005, City
Council meeting.
Please contact me at (253) 835-2653 or kellio@fedway.org if you have any questions
regarding this item.
MQpted 09/07/04,
Attachment 1
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
2005 CDBG CONTINGENCY PLAN,
The allocation process for 2005 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds is based upon
an estimate of Federal Way's 2005 CDBG funds. The City will not knoW its exact grant amount until
atter Congress passes the HUD Appropriation Bill. This is expected to occur by December 2004. For
this reason, the allocation process includes a contingency plan. The plan allows for adjustment up or
down based upon the final grant amount and/or any additional' funds received as the result of project
cancellations or additional recaptured funds.
SHOULD THE GRANT AMOUNT INCREASE OR ADDITIONAL FUNDS BECOME AVAILABLE:
Capital Projects -- The City will apply any increase in the amount of CDBG capital funds as follows:
1.' Additional capital funds available, up to $82,656, will be allocated to the Federal Way Housing
Repair Program administered by the King County Department of Community and Human
Services up to a total allocation of $150,000; and, '
2. Should the above project be funded to the stated level and any additional capital funds be
available, up to $25,000 will be allocated to the Pediatric Interim Care Center for the Newborn
Nursery building up to the total request for $75,000; and
3. Should the above projects be fully funded and any additional capital funds be available, up to
'" $49,999, will be allocated to the Boys and Girls Club of King County for the Federal Way
Youth Development Center up to the total request for $199,999; and
4. If additional capital funds are received, funds will be carried over to the 2006 CDBG program
yearunless the Human ,Services Commission requests new applications for fiunds and/or
additional Council action is taken to allocate funds.
Public Service Programs - The City will apply any increase in the amount of CDBG public service
funds as follows: '
1. If any additional public service funds become available, funds will be allocated equally
between the MultiCare Health System for the Adult Day Health Auburn program and the'
Federal Way Norman Center for the CARES Program until each program reaches the total
amount requested for 2005; and,
2. If an additional $10,000 of public service funds become available atter the first contingency is
fully funded, funds will be allocated to Catholic Community Services for the Katherine's House
Transitional Housing program; and, '
3. If less than $10,000 of public service funds become available and/or any additional public
service funds are received atter the second 'contingency is fully funded, funds will be allocated
to 2005 CDBG Capital projects in accordance with the priority order listed above.
Planning and Administration - The City will apply any increase in the amount of CDBG planning
and administration funds as follows:
1. Any additional funds for planning and administration activities will be allocated.to Planning and
Administration to cover administrative costs for Federal Way's CDBG program; and
Adopted 09/07/04 ' Attachment 1
2. Additional funds not needed for administration of Federal Way's CDBG program wiH be
applied toward the costs of additional planning activities consistent with the King County
Consortium Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plan; and
3. Additional funds received not needed for planning and administration activities will be
,allocated to capital projects in accordance with the priority order listed above.
SHOULD THE GRANT AMOUNT DECREASE:
Capital Projects - The City will decrease the amount of CDBGfunds allocated ,for capital projects as
follows:
1,. Any unallocated capital funds available will be decreased before reductions are made to
specific projects. -
2. Decreases will be made to 2005 CDBG Capital Projects in proportion to the percentage
decrease in grant funds. The following projects will be reduced proportionately:, the Boys and
Girls Club of King County Federal Way Youth Development Center; the City of Federal Way
Senior Nutrition and Health Equipment for the New Federal Way Community Center; the King
County Housing and Community Development Federal Way Housing Repair Program; the
King 'County Housing Authority Southridge House Fire and Life Safety Sprinkler $ystem; the
Multi~Service Center Employee Development Services Federal Way program; and, the
Pediatric Interim Care Center, the Newborn Nursery PICC New Facility Construction.
Public SaNiea Programs - The City will decrease the amount of CDBG funds allocated for public
service programs as follows:
.',
1. Decreases will be made to all public service programs il\proportiön to the percentage
decrease in. grantfunds until they reach the $10,000 rniriimllmfu'nding leveC These programs
are: Big Brothers Big Sisters of King and Pierce Counties; Federal Way Mentoring Program;
Community Health Centers of King County Federal Way Dental Access; Federal Way Norman
Center YMCA, CARES Program; Federal Way Senior Center, Adult Day Care; Institute for
Family Development, PACT program; and, MultiCare Health System, Adult Day Health-
Auburn. '
, ;
Planning and'Administration -- The City will decrease the amount of CDBG funds allocated for
CDBG planning and administration as follows:
1. Funds for additional planning activities will be reduced first; then
2. Funding for CDBG administrative activities will be decreased.
~BGI commun~Expenses
S1]
Attachment 2
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Mary Faber.
Kelll ODonnell
4/1312005 10:22:51 AM
Fwd: CDBG/ Community Ctr Expenses
B, has put together a spreadsheet that Includes aU of the CDBG eligible costs using the following Criteria: -
- -
The dates of the contraetare January 1, 05 through '
May 31, 2006. We are asking for re~imbursement of soft
CQsts- planning, project administration (I.e. project
_management, permits, utility hookups). Only expenses
Incurred during the .grant period are eligible.
~ The soft costs that require a competitive bid process -
must be comþetltvely bid and awarded during the
grant eligllibilty dates. So, for Instance, If a contract was
award~d prior to 2()05 no cost associated wlthat
contrac:t,-Is eligible. We did ask the ,question as to, -
whether we may have had a competitive bid process
- In 2004 but the contract Was awarded In 05-1f that Is
eligible. .
~Any soft costs that are associated w/non-c:ompetitve
bids sueh as permits, utility hookups, ete thatwfU be -
paid during the grant dates are eligible.
- -
, -
- ,.cIty staff costs (B's) are not a good match for thl£; grant
as we would nèed to _provide hourly break downs'
charged to the program via HR and we do not track dme
In the same way. '
-Our assesment of Senior spaces is the following:
~ The Senior Lounge (1,475 sq. ft)
-Two' bays of the Community, Rooms (M-F) day use
(2,924 sq ft)
~The game lounge (M-F) day Ùse (461 sq ft)
-KItchen' (food prep M-F) day use (737 sq. ft)
Mary Faber, Community and Cul!ural Services Superintendent
Mary-Faber, Community and Cultural Services Superintendent -
City of Federal Way -
P.O. Box 9718
FederalVVay, VVA 98063-9718
mary. faber@cityoffederalway.com
- (P) (253) 835-:6920 ( F) (253) 835~934
-.
'Cc:
Aaron Mae; Betty Sanders -
I,
COMMUNITY CENTER, EXPENDITURES
Inv. Date Involce# Vendor Purpose Services
2/1612005 99202 City of FW Fire Dept Plan Check 5,992.03
. 2/1612005' 99201 City of FW Expedited Review-Bldg. 2,000.00
3/912005 587477, Pacific NW Title TItle R~port...shelby Prop. ' 359.04
3/912005 587478 Pac/fic NW Title Title Report-Weyerhaeuser P 359.04
3/812005 587479 Pac/fie NW Title Title Report-Herrenberg 359.04
3/912005 3607 Lakehaven Utility District DeY'r Exl Agreemt ' 500.00
#05-614
, 'TOTAL 9,669.16
Expect~d Expens,es '
Estimated Costs
City of FW
City of FW
City of FW
Cly of F-W
Vanir Canst. Mgt (TBD)
City ot'FW
Lakehaven Utility District,
TBD
NW' Reprographics
KIng County Health Dept.
King County Health Depl
Bulldll)g Structural Review
Planning Expedited Review'
Engineering Expedited Rev. '
City Staff, '
'Construction Mgt
Traffic Mitigation - Fees
Utility Connection Fees
Materials Testing
Bid Documents .
KItchen Review
Pool Review
15,000 ~ ~
21:000 ~
250,000
$222,000
190,000
72,586
18,000
500
2,000
TOTAL
Bas~ Bûlldlng
. 3rd Gym Alt-4142 SF '
3rd Multi-Purpose Room-1824 SF '
JoglWalk Track--4450 SF
Climbing Wall Enclosure-442
, All Alternates
10~858
Total
69,001
Senior Lounge--14?5 SF
"
MEETING DATE:
May 17,2005
ITEM# :IZ::_tbf---
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
Park Maintenance Contract
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
r8J CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
A TT ACHMENTS: Committee Action Form dated May 9, 2005; Park Maintenance Contract
SlJMMARYIBACKGROUND: The city accepted quotes fÖr Park Maintenance services for twelve sites. All companies
on the small works roster were invited to participate. Four companies submitted quotes for services. Myers Master
Lawncarc submitted the ]owest responsive bid. This company has performed acceptable services for the city on previous
contracts. The total amount of compensation for this contract is $51,348.86 for a one-year term.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Park Maintenance RFQ from Myers Master
Lawncare and authorize staff to draft a one-year contract totaling $51,348.86 which inc]udes $3500.00 in additiona]
services and taxes and place before City Council on May 17,2005.
PRO]'OSED MOTION: "I move approva] of the Park Maintenance Contract as presented".
CITY MANAGER APPROVAl,:
~----
=-~,,--,,-,------,,------~,,=-,,---------~----- ----=~---- --~-------
- -~------------------ -- -- ------------
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY GTY CLERKS OFÞ1CEJ
COlJNCIL ACTION:
0 AIJPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLIU>/DEFERRKD/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECONl> READING (ordinances only)
CO1JNCI1, lULL #
] ST reading
-------
Knactment reading -----------
ORÐINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
----------
REVISED - 05/1012601------
-----
- -------- -
---------------- -- --
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
_.---------------
DATE:
TO:
May 9, 2005
Parks, Reereatìon, Human Services and Pub]je Safety Council Committee
FROM:
Stephen Ikerd, Property Services Manager
VIA:
David MOS*~~,:U1agcr
Park Maintenance Contract
SUBJECT:
------- -------- ----------- - -------
-------
------------
-- - ----------
]'olicV Question
Should the Council authorize acceptance of the Park Maintenance services RFQ from Myers Master Lawncare?
Uackl!round
The city accepted quotes for Park Maintenance services for twelve sites. AU companies on the sma11 works
roster were invited to participate. Four companies submitted quotes for services. Myers Master Lawneare
submitted the lowest responsive bid. This company has performed acceptable services for the city on previous
contracts, Staff recommends accepting their bid and awarding them the contract for eight of the sites. Of the four
remaining sites, one was awarded to another company due to a lower bid, one was old City Ha11 which services
are no longer needed and staff win maintain the remaining two sites. The total amount of compensation for this
contract is $51,348.86 for a one-year tCTIn.
Bid Summary
A ~t:guest forP~oposal~_wa~_sent to thcJo]]o~!ng coæ an!~~_ll_~ the r<?~u1ts are as fo]]ows:
C~1Epany ------- _--_1\!1nual rat~ I:!~urly r~~~
MY'?fs Mas~~r b-awnc~te~],69.?~~_~ -- ---___3 ?50-
_~l1!c Sky La_t:1dscape___j_0-!_~_~?39 ------- 3_§j>.2__-----
TruGree.I1____----___i.~,2ll~Q~___--------- 38.0.2
'l'h~_q~~eneJY_____------ IncolTJQ)~t~- bi~- --___~oþid
* TruGreen did not bid Wildwood Park, which was part of the package of sites.
Options
I). Approve the Park Maintenance RFQ from Myers Master Lawncare and authorize staff to draft a one-year
contract totaling $5 I ,348.86 which includes $3500.00 in additional services and taxes and place before City
Council on May 17,2005.
2). Decline staffs recommendation to enter into a one-year contract with Myers Master Lawncare.
Committee Recommendation
Forward Option I to City Counci1 on May 17,2005 for approva1.
-'
DRAFT
511010 S-
MAINTENANCE/LABOR AGREEMENT
FOR
MYERS MASTER LAWN CARE
This Maintenance/Labor Agreement ("Agreement") is dated effective this] st day of May,
2005. The parties ("Parties") to this Agreement are the City of Federal Way, a Washington
municipal corporation ("City"), and Myers Master Lawn Care, a sole proprietor ("Contractor").
A. The City seeks the temporary services of a skllled independent contractor capable of
working without direct supervision, in the capacity of park landscape maintenance at Adelaide Park,
Alderbrook Park, Alderdale Park, Coronado Park, English Gardens, Gateway Monument, Lakota
Park and Wildwood Park located in Federal Way, Washington; and
B. The Contractor has the requisite ski1l and experience necessary to provide such services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:
1.
Services.
Contractor shall provide the services more specifically described in Exhibit "A", attached
hereto and incorporated by this reference ("Services"), in a manner consistent with the accepted
practices for other similar services, perfonned to the City's satisfaction, within the time period
prescribed by the City and pursuant to the direction of the City Manager or his or her designee.
2.
Tenn.
The term of this Agreement shall commence upon the effective date of this Agreement and
shall continue until the completion of the Services, but in any event no later than April 30, 2006
("Term "). This Agreement may be extended for additional periods oftime upon the mutual written
agreement ofthe City and the Contractor.
3.
Termination.
Prior to the expiration ofthe Tenn, this Agreement may be terminated immediately, with or
without cause, by the City.
4.
Con.m.~nsation.
4. 1 Total Comp9nsation. In consideration of the Contractor perfonning the
Services, the City agrees to pay the Contractor an amount not to exceed Forty-Seven
Thousand, One Hundred Ninety-Five and 64/100 Do11ars ($47,195.64) calculated on the
- 1 -
basis of the hourly labor charge rate schedule for Contractor's personnel attached hereto as
Exhibit "B"; and Washington State sales tax equal to Four Thousand One Hundred Fifty-
Three and 22/1 00 Dollars ($4,153.22) for a total amount not to exceed Fifty-One Thousand
Three Hundred Forty-Eight and 86/1 DO Dollars ($51,348.86)
4.2 MethQd ofPaV11)~nt. Payment by the City for the Services will only be made
after the Services have been performed, a voucher or invoice is submitted in the form
specified by the City, which invoice shall specifically describe the Services perfol111ed, the
name of Contractor's personnel performing such Services, the hourly labor charge rate for
such personnel, and the same is approved by the appropriate City representative. Payment
shall be made on a monthly basis, thirty (30) days after receipt of such voucher or invoice.
4.3 Contractor Respon~ible for Taxes. Except as otherwise provided in Section
4. 1 hereof, The Contractor shan be solely responsible for the payment of any taxes imposed
by any lawful jurisdiction as a result of the performance and payment of this Agreement.
5. Compliance \yjth Laws.
Contractor shan comply with and perfonn the Services in accordance with all applicabJc
federal, state, and City laws ineluding, without limitation, a)] City codes, ordinances, resolutions,
standards and policies, as now existing or hereafter adopted or amended.
6.
Warranty.
6.1 Requisite Skil]' The Contractor warrants that it has the requisite training, skill
and experience necessary to provide the Services and is appropriately accredited and licensed
by all applicable agencies and governmental entities, incJuding but not 1imited to being
registered to do business in the City of Federal Way by obtaining a City of Federal Way
business registration.
6.2 Defective Serviç,Ç~. The Contractor sha11 , at its sole cost and expense, correct
all Services performed which the City deems to have defects in workmanship and material
discovered within one (I) year after the City's final acceptance of the Services.
7.
Independent çgntractor/Conf]Ü::J ofJntcrest.
It is the intention and understanding of the Parties that the Contractor shall be an independent
contractor and that the City shall be neither liable nor ob1igated to pay Contractor sick leave,
vacation payor any other benefit of employment, nor to pay any social security or other tax which
may arise as an incident of employment. The Contractor shall pay an income and other taxes as due.
Industrial or any other insurance that is purchased for the benefit of the City, regardless of whether
such may provide a secondary or incidental benefit to the Contractor, shall not be deemed to convert
this Agreement to an employment contract. It is recognized that Contractor mayor will be
- 2 -
performing services during the Term for other parties; provided, however, that such perfonnance of
othcr services shall not conflict with or interfere with Contractor's ability to perfonn the Services.
Contractor agrees to resolve any such conflicts of interest in favor of the City.
8.
I ndemni fi cab on.
8.1 Contrac!gr IndemniJícation. The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and
hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from
any and aH claims, demands, losses, actions and Jiabilities (including costs and an attorney
fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, including, without limitation, their respective
agents, licensees, or representatives, arising from, resulting from, or connected with this
Agreement to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Contractor,
its partners, shareholders, agents, employccs, or by the Contractor's breach of this
Agreemcnt. Contractor waivcs any immunity that may bc granted to it undcr the
Washington Statc Industrial Insurancc Act, Title 5l RCW. Contractor's indemnification
shaH not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount of damages, compcnsation or
benefits payable to or by any third party undcr workers' compensation acts, disability benefit
acts or any other benefits aets or programs.
8.2 CitLlndemnificgtjon. The City agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the
Contractor, its officers, directors, shareholders, partners, employees, and agents harmless
from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attorney
fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, including without limitation, their respective
agents, licensecs, or representatives, arising from, resulting from or connected with this
Agreement to the extcnt solely caused by the negligcnt acts, errors, or omissions ofthe City,
its employecs or agents.
8.3 Survival. The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or
tennination ofthis Agreement with respect to any event occurring prior to such cxpiration or
tcrmination.
9.
Eg!t~l OpportUl}jty_Emplover.
In all Contractor services, programs or activitics, and an Contractor hiring and employment
made possible by or resulting from this Agreement, there shall be no discrimination by Contractor or
by Contractor's employees, agents, subcontractors or representatives against any person because of
sex, age (except minimum age and retirement provisions), race, color, creed, national origin, marital
status or the presence of any disability, including sensory, mental or physical handicaps, unless based
upon a bona fide occupational quali fl cati on in relationship to hiring and employment. This
requirement shan apply, but not be limited to the following: employment, advertising, layoff or
termination, rates of payor other fonns of compensation, and selection for training, including
apprenticeship. Contractor sha1l not violate any ofthe tenus of Chapter 49.60 RCW, Title vn ofthe
Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans With Disabilities Act, Section 504 oftbe Rehabilitation Act
of 1973 or any other applicable federal, state or local law or regulation regarding non-discrimination.
- 3 -
Any material viola60n of this provision sha11 be grounds for termination of this Agreement by the
City and, in the case of the Contractor's breach, may result in ineligibility for further City
agreements.
10.
Confidentiality.
AU information regarding the City obtained by Contractor in performance ofthis Agreement
shan be considered eonfiden6a1. Breach of confiden6ality by Contractor wi]] be grounds for
immediate termination.
II.
Insurance.
The Contractor agrees to caIl)' as a minimum, the fo]]owing insurance, in such fonns and
with such carriers who have a rating that is satisfactory to the City:
II. I Workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance in amounts
sufficient pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington;
11.2 Commercial general liability insurance with combined single limits of
liability not less than $2,000,000 for bodily injury, including personal injury or death,
products liability and property damage.
I 1.3 Automobile liability insurance with combined single limits of liability not
less than $2,000,000 for bodily injury, including personal injury or death and property
damage.
The City sha]] be named as additional insured on aU such insurance policies, with the
exception of workers' compensation coverages. Contractor shall provide certificates of insurance,
concurrent with the execution of this Agreement, evidencing such coverage and, at City's request,
furnish the City with copies of aU insurance policies and with evidence of payment of premiums or
fees of such policies. All insurance policies sha]] contain a clause of endorsement providing that
they may not be terminated or materially amended during the Term of this Agreement, except after
thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. TfContractor's insurance policies are "claims made"
or "claims paid", Contractor shaD be required to maintain tail coverage for a minimum period of
three (3) years from the date this Agreement is actually terminated. Contractor's failure to maintain
such insurance policies shaD be grounds for the City's immediate tennination of this Agreement.
The provisions ofthis Section sha]] survive the expiration or tennination of this Agreement
with respect to any event occulTing prior to such expiration or termination.
12.
W.91:k Product.
A11 originals and copies of work product, including plans, sketches, layouts, designs, design
specifications, records, files, computer disks, magnetic media or material which may be produced or
- 4 -
modified by Contractor while performing the Services shall belong to the City. At the termination or
cancellation of this Agreement, all originals and copies of any such work product remaining in the
possession of Contractor shall be delivered to the City.
13. Books and R~cords.
The Contractor agrees to maintain books, records, and documents which sufficiently and
properly reflect all dircct and indirect costs related to thc perfonnance ofthe Services and maintain
such accounting procedures and practices as may bc deemed necessary by the City to assure proper
accounting of all funds paid pursuant to this Agreement. These records shall be subject, at all
reasonable times, to inspection, review or audit by the City, its authorized representative, the State
Auditor, or other governmental offìcials authorized by law to monitor this Agreement.
14.
Sa@!y.
Contractor shall take all necessary precautions for the safety of employees on the work site
and shall comply with all applicable provisions offederal, state and municipal safety and health laws
and codes, including without limitation, all OSHAJWISHA requirements, Safety and Hcalth
Standards for Construction Work (Chapter 296-155 WAC), General Safety and Health Standards
(Chapter 296-24 WAC), and General Occupational Health Standards (Chapter 296-62 WAC).
Contractor shall erect and properly maintain, at all times, all necessary guards, barricades, signals
and other safeguards at all unsafe places at or near the site for the protection of its employees and the
public, safe passageways at all road crossings, crosswalks, street intersections, post danger signs
warning against known or unusual hazards and do all other things necessary to prevent accident or
loss of any kind. Contractor shall protect from damage all water, sewer, gas, steam or other pipes or
conduits, and all hydrants and all other property that is likcly to become displaced or damaged by the
performance ofthe Services. The Contractor shall, at its own expense, secure and maintain a safe
storage place for its matcrials and equipment and is solely responsible for the same.
15. Pr~:vailíng WClges
15.1 Wages of Ewployees. This Agreement is subject to the minimum wage
requirements of Chapter 39.12 of the Revised Code of Washington, as now existing or
hereafter amended or supplemented. In the payment of hourly wages and fringe benefits to
be paid to any of Contractor's laborers, workpersons and/or mechanics, Contractor shan not
pay less than the "prevailing rate of wage" for an hour's work in the same trade or occupation
in the locality within the State of Washington where such labor is performed, as detennined
by the Industrial Statistician of the Department of Labor and Industries of the Statc of
Washington, which current "prevailing rates of wage" are attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and
incorporated herein by this reference. Prevailing wages paid pursuant to this Agreement
shall be the prevailing wage rates that are in effect on the date when the bids, proposals, or
quotes were required to be submitted to the City.
- 5 -
15.2 AgreementsJ<~xceeding OnçYcar. Pursuant to WAC 296-127-023, orhereafier
amended, the City agrees to pay any increase in the current prevailing wages ifand when this
Contract is extended provided that the term of the Contract exceeds one year. The City
further agrecs to pay the current prevailing wages at the time of additional yearly extensions,
and thc Contractor agrees to pay its employees the increased prevailing wage.
15.3 Excmptions to Prevailing W~ge. The prevailing wage requirements of Chapter
39.12 RCW, and as required in this Agreement do not apply to:
a.
Sole owners and thcir spouses;
b.
Any partner who owns at least 30% of a partnership;
c.
The President, Vice President and Treasurer of a corporation if each one
owns at least 30% ofthe corporation.
15.4 Reportin g Reg uirement~. Contractor shall comply with all reporting
requirements ofthe Department of Labor and Industries of the State of Washington. Upon
the execution ofthis Agreement, Contractor shall complete and file a Statement oflntent to
Pay Prevailing Wages with the Department of Labor and Industries. Upon completion ofthe
Services, Contractor shall complete and file an Affidavit ofW ages Paid with the Department
of Labor and Industries. Contractor shall deliver copies of both the Statement oflntent to
Pay Prevailing Wages and the Affidavit of Wages Paid, certi fied by the Department of Labor
and Industries, to the City.
15.5 Disputes. In the event any dispute arises as to what arc the prevailing rates of
wages for work of a similar nature and such dispute cannot be resolved by the City and thc
Contractor, the matter shall be referred for arbitration to the Director of the Dcpmiment of
Labor and ]ndustries of the State of Washington and the decision therein shall be final and
conclusive and binding on all partics involved in the dispute.
16.
Clean UP.
At any time ordered by the City and immediately after completion of the Services, the
Contractor, shall, at its own expense, clean up and remove all refuse and unused materials of any
kind resulting from the Services. In the cvent the Contractor fails to perform the neccssary clean up,
the City may, but in no evcnt is it obligated to, pcrform the necessary clean up and the costs thereof
shall be immediately paid by the Contractor to the City and/or the City may deduct its costs from any
remaining payments due to the Contractor.
17.
Non- AppropriatiQ)J.Qf Funds.
If sufficient funds are not appropriated or allocated for payment under this Agreement for any
future fiscal period, the City will not be obligated to make payments for Services or amounts
- 6 -
incurred after the end of the current fiscal period, and this Agreement wi]] terminate upon the
completion of an remaining Services for which funds are a11ocated. No penaJty or expense sha11
accrue to the City in the event this provision app1ies.
18.
General Proyjsions.
18.1 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains aU of the agreements of the
Parties with respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this Agreement and no prior
agreements sha11 be effective for any purpose.
18.2 Modific.¡lÍion. No provision ofthis Agreement, including this provision, may
be amended or modified except by written agreement signed by the Parties.
18.3 FuUforce and Eff~ct. Any provision of this Agreement that is dec1ared
invalid or j1lcgal shaJl in no way affect or invalidate any other provision hereof and such
other provisions shaJl remain in fuJl force and effect.
18.4 Assignment. Neither the Contractor nor the City sha11 have the right to
transfer or assign, in whole or in part, any or a11 of its obligations and rights hereunder
without the prior written consent of the other Party.
18.5 Successorsju_lnterest. Subject to the foregoing Subsection, the rights and
obligations of the Parties shan inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective
successors in interest, heirs and assigns.
18.6 Attorney Fees. In the event either ofthe Parties defaults on the performance
of any terms ofthis Agreement or either Party places the enforcement ofthis Agreement in
the hands of an attorney, or fiJes a lawsuit, each Party sha11 pay all its own attorneys' fees,
costs and expenses. The venue for any dispute rdated to this Agreement sha11 be King
County, Washington.
18.7 No Waiver. Failure or dc1ay of the City to declare any breach or default
immediatdy upon occurrence shan not waive such breach or default. Failure ofthe City to
dec1are one breach or default does not act as a waiver of the City's right to declare another
breach or default.
18.8 GQyerning Law. This Agreement shall be made in and sha11 be governed by
and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.
18.9 Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf ofthe City
and Contractor represents and warrants that such individuals are duly authori?'ed to execute
and de1iver this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor or the City.
- 7 -
] 8.] 0 Notices. Any notices required to be given by the Parties shall be delivered at
the addresses set forth below. Any notices may be delivered personal1y to the addressee of
the notice or may be deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the address set
forth below. Any notice so posted in the United States mail sha1J be deemed received three
(3) days after the date ofmailing.
18.11 Captions. The respective captions of the Sections of this Agreement are
inserted for convenience of reference only and shal1 not be deemed to modify or otherwise
affect any ofthe provisions of this Agreement.
18.] 2 Performance. Time is ofthe essence of this Agreement and each and an of its
provisions in which performance is a factor. Adherence to completion dates set forth in the
description of the Services is essential to the Contractor's perfom1ance of this Agreement.
18.13 Remedies CJJ.rnuIative. Any remedies provided for under the terms of this
Agreement are not intended to be exclusive, but shall be cumulative with all other remedies
available to the City at law, in equity or by statute.
18.14 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, which counterparts shal1 col1ectively constitute the entire Agreement.
18.15 Compliance with Etl:Ügs Code. If a violation of the City's Ethics Resolution
No. 91-54, as amended, occurs as a result of the fonnation and/or performance of this
Agreement, this Agreement may be rendered null and void, at the City's option.
DA TED the day and year set forth above.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
By:_u .
David H. Moseley, City Manager
33325 8th Ave S
PO Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
ATTEST:
City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC
- 8 -
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
---- - ----------
------------- --
- -----------
Patricia A. Richardson, City Attorney
MYERS MASTER LAWN CARE
By:
(Signature)
---
(Printed Name)
P.O. Box 1057
Enumclaw, W A 98022
360.802.2430
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
) ss.
COUNTY OF__J
On this day personal1y appeared before me, ---- --- ------------ ,tome
known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and on oath
swore that he/she/they executed the foregoing instrument as his/her/their free and voluntary act and
deed [or the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN my hand and official seal this
day of
----------------------- ------
----------------- -
,200_.
(typed/printed name of notary)
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington.
My commission expires
- 9 -
EXHIBIT A
Site Location!?
Adelaide Park
Alderbrook Park
Alderdale Park
Coronado Park
English Gardens
Gateway Monument
Lakota Park
Wildwood Park
30619 16th Avenue SW
32730 1 ih Avenue SW
2700 SW 340th Place
2501 SW 349th Place
S. 320th & Southbound 1-5 Exit
31334 SW Dashpoint Road
2315 S 300th Street
DefinitiQns
Owners; park, Recreation &CuItura]Services; CÜyand/or City, of Federal W~y and their
authorized representatives shall be understood to mean one and the same.
Contract Administrator shall be the City of Federal Way Parks Maintenance
Division's duly authorized representative.
Approved means approved by the owner.
Almroved eqlJ.~LQI..~lJiyalent, as hereinafter used, shall mean a material or method equal
to, or better than the required materials or methods.
As ,~hown shall mean as shown on the Contract Drawings, maps or details.
SpQeificatiops:shallmean these specifications, thc "Maintenance Specifications" and all
addenda thereto.
Grounds maint~nance ang,Jandscape_,1]1aintenance mcans the work and
provisions described by thc Service Contract and all addenda thereto.
Nativy trees shall mean those trees, which are indigenous or natural to the site.
QrnamentaUrees shall mean those tree which are not indigenous or natural to the site,
and are located as part of the designed landscape.
Maintenance Specifications
A.
The Contractor will furnish all labor, tools, specialized equipment, materials, disposal of
waste material generated by the work, supervision and transportation to perform landscape
maintenance services as specifically outline in the Annual Maintenance Standards.
B.
All fieldwork shall be performed under the supervision of a qualified horticulturist.
Operators will be licensed for an functions, including pesticide, fertilizer, and herbicide
application, and flagging card when required.
C.
The Contractor wiJ1 ensure that employees comply with an applicable City of Federal Way
and Washington State regulations and practices with respect to work performed for the City
of Federal Way.
D.
The Contractor's personnel wi]] conduct themselves on site in a professional manner at al
E.
Each employee wi]] wear or display the company's name and/or logo.
F.
The Contract Administrator or appointed designee will inspect work perfonned by the
Contractor on a regular basis. In the event o[work performance deficiencies, the Contract
Administrator win notify the Contractor. Notification may be verbal or written. The City
may choose to: Require the Contractor to rectify the deficiency within 48 hours, or
hold payment.
G.
Equipment intensive work such as mowing, edging and blowing done at this site sha1J not
commence before 7:00 a.m. and end on 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, (weekend work not
anowed without prior approval) and it is advisable that mowing be performed during non-
peak park use.
H.
Report any damage, or potential hazard, involving City property immediately to the City of
Federal Way Parks Department, (253) 835-6960. After hours emergencies should be
reported to the Police/Fire Communications Center - 911.
1.
Hazardous conditions shan be immediately remedied or secured to prevent further damage
and/or protect public from injury. It is the Contractor's responsibility to provide close
supervision of maintenance operations and management ofthe site.
J.
Incidents, altercations, or accident involving the public shan be reported to the Contract
Administrator within 24 hours. The Contract Administrator, at his or her discretion, may
require a written report [rom the Contractor describing the incident or accident.
K.
The Contractor, at his or her expense, wj]] remedy any damage to City structures or plant
material due to Contractor negligence in a timely manner.
Turf
A. Turf areas to be maintained include medians, parks, and mow strips along paths. All turf
sha1l be mowed to a height of 1 1/2 inch. C01leetion of grass clippings is required when large
amounts of clumps are left on the turf.
B. All turf around posts, fences, trees, closure boxes, vaults, valve boxes and other obstructions
shall be maintained using mechanical and/or pre-emergent and post-emergent methods.
C. All turf areas shall be edged at sidewalks, curbs and landscape beds on a schedule specified
in the Annual Maintenance Standards. Extreme caution should be used to prevent chipping
of concrete structures by edging equipment, and use proper guards for public safety.
D. All fonnal turf areas shall be fertilized with an approved fertilizer on a schedule specified in
the Annual Maintenance Standards. Total application of turf fertilizer shall be applied at the
rate oftwo pounds of nitrogen per 1,000 square feet or turf per year: May, and Nov and shall
be slow release 3-1 -2 ratio fertilizer with iron. A 3-2-5 ratio will be used for the November
application.
Shrubs and Ground Cover Beds
A. Bed areas shall be kept in a weed free condition. All beds shall be weeded by mechanical
and/or chemical means. The City reserves the right to limit the use of specific herbicides
and/or applications of said herbicides. Casoron shall be used only with the approval ofthe
Contract Administrator and only in very limited areas. Applications will be applied
according to label instructions.
B. Ground cover shall be edged 4 to 6 inches behind all sidewalks, curbs and edges oflandscape
beds.
C. Shrubs shall be trimmed or sheared to maintain desired shape and function as needed to
provide a neat, trim appearance. Special attention shall be made to all park entries.
Hard Surfaces
A. Sidewalks, curbs, basketball courts, tennis courts and other hard surfaces shall be kept free of
leaves, litter and debris. The use of power blowers is acceptable; however, accumulations of
debris must be removed from the site, legally disposed of, and not blown onto adjacent
property or onto adjacent street surfaces.
B. All vegetation in sidewalks, curbs and other hard surfaces shall receive an approved
herbicide application and be removed at the next site visit. In no case shall any pre or post-
emergent herbicides with residual characteristics (i.e. Casoron) be used in these areas.
Other Services
A. All litter, debris and animal feces shall be removed from turf, beds and hard surface areas.
The Contractor shall remove litter from the site for disposal. Garbage cans will be emptied
to an approved dumping station or City provided dumpster at each visit. Each can will have a
new liner installed.
B. The Contractor shall remove windfall branches from all areas for disposal. Wind fallen trees
are not included in the contract. Leaves, needles, cones and other vegetative material shall be
removed from all formal areas.
Exhibit A
ANNUAL MAINTENANCE STANDARDS
PARKS 2005 - 2006
.-.."
Frequency by Month
Task Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
iURF ,,~ j¿i," " ';,~,; ,." ,fJÞ", " ""::'+:,r;'!;/i',
"
Mowing* 2 4 5 4 4 4 3 3 1
Trimming 2 4 5 4 4 4 3 3 1
Edging 2 4 5 4 4 4 3 3 1
Fertilize 1 1
Ditches 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1M'-APt; BE6§ ::':,' "",,',',','; 'UII '~~,>
",',
'(:':, " " IX ','
Weeding 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1
Edge grnd covers 1
Herbicide 1
", ','""',f",',,, ,"",'y,{, "\, Äç~",,1Ð.:
~H RUa\s:.-+> ""¿..ItJif'", ""'!":" /,)j\'..:>",<+ ,'iJ,,;¿..OOfb' ,fi '",....<iè"
' , ,,"7' , ,,<:¿', "Æ;;',
shrubs,hedges** 1 1
HARD,:SU,RFÁC E"S , " """:Y:' """i'Y",,;~; ,','.., .. " ,,:'dji, ::;~'
,',
.. ,/,', " ,',
,'" ,i',',',
sweeping/blowing 1 1 2 4 5 4 4 4 3 3 1
weed/herbicide 1 1
QT~) ~ ,_~~h" ,> ;::"""i¡¡J": c;iÍ?;.
.'4<" ',"
garbage removal 1 1 2 4 5 4 4 4 3 3 1 1
.."","
litter collection 1 1 2 4 5 4 4 4 3 3 1 1
fall cleanup 1 2 1
~L 'T ASK!!~" 3 3 14 27 35 28 28 27 22 24~~
if. ", .' , "', -." -..,-..
*Mowing - should additional mowings be required obtain approval and invoice as additional services
based upon a contracted hourly rate.
**Shrubs/hedges - trim as needed to maintain a neat appearance and not allowed to create a public
hazard. To included maintaining a 36" maximum height of the native salal at Wildwood Park.
***Total task - work task total for evaluating monthly payouts for completed work.
yrmaint2. revised 2/01
Exhibit A
2005, 2006 - Park Landscape Maintenance
Quote Sheet
Adelaide Alderbrook Alderdale Coronado English Gateway Lakota Wildwood
Total Task* Gardens Monument
~.f- _..fff+1fJff..f.-
Jan = 3x $118.14 $103.50 $116.00 $158.00 $98.00 $56.00 $165.00 $118.00
Feb = 3x $119.00 $104.00 $116.00 $158.00 $98.00 $56.00 $165.00 $118.00
Mar=14x $178.00 $547.00 $181.00 $213.00 $258.00 $83.00 $543.00 $209.00
Apr=27x $379.00 $810.00 $347.00 $293.00 $511.00 $116.00 $1,064.00 $393.00
May=35x $1,145.00 $1,132.00 $583.00 $398.00 $791.00 $198.00 $1,722.00 $594.00
Jun =28x $674.00 $1,358.00 $807.00 $359.00 $776.00 $129.00 $1,064.00 $935.00
Jul = 28x $397.00 $818.00 $357.00 $266.00 $538.00 $129.00 . $1,064.00 $416.00
Aug=27x $350.00 $810.00 $357.00 $262.00 $510.00 $124.00 $819.00 $399.00
Sep=22x I
$274.00 $759.00 $302.00 $227.00 $481.00 $101.00 1$815.00 $350.00
Oct=24x I
$1,354.00 $1,159.00 $539.00 $344.00 $599.00 $134.00 I $523.00
!$961.00
Nov=12x $872.00 $1,216.00 $1,059.00 $396.00 $675.00 $259.00 $700.00 $611.00
Dec= 2x $83.00 $203.00 $62.00 $83.00 $62.00 $57.00 $84.00 $79.00 TOTALS
Sub total $5,943.14 $9,019.50 $4,826.00 $3,157.00 $5,397.00 $1,442.00 $9,166.00 $4,745.00 $43,695.64
Tax $523.00 $793.72 $424.69 $277.82 $474.94 $126.90 $806.61 $417.56 $3,845.24
T otal** $646.14 $9,813.22 $5,260.48 $3,434.82 $5,871.94 $1,568.90 $9,972.61 $5,162.56 $47,540.88
Additional Services Hourly Rate $ 37.50
( Non routine or additional requested work)
*Total number of task performed each month as shown on the Annual Maintenance Standards.
** Monthly totals shaH be based upon the number of services (e.g. mowing, blowing, weeding etc.) provided for each month, the same unit cost is applied
equally to all items of work. All work tasks must be completed within any given month In order to receive full payment for that month.
Exhibit B
Labor rate schedule
Contractor sha1l provide Additional Services on the basis of the following
rate schedule:
Task:
Hourly rate
General 1 abor
$37.50 per hour
MEETING ÐA TE:
May 17,2005
ITEM# YLiL
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
Northwest Parks Foundation-Parks Safety Net Fund Management
CA'rEGORY:
nUDGET IMPACT:
[gJ
0
0
CONSENT
RESOI,lJTION
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 OnDINANCE
0 PlJHLJC HRARING
D OTH En
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: Committee action form dated May 9, 2005; Northwest Parks Foundation-Parks Safety Net Fund
Management.
SlJMMARY/BACKGR01JND: The Northwest Park Foundation is an umbrella 501 C-3 organization dedicated to
advancing countywide parks and recreation opportunities and facilities. NPF is a private, non-profit organization
established to promote heaJthy citizens and communities by protecting and encouraging thc enhancement and
deve1opment of park and recreation facihties and resources for this and future generations, Estabhshed in November of
2002, NPF designed the Parks Safety Net Program to provide direct and indirect support to park and recreation agencies,
school districts, and parks facility user groups. NPF, as a 501(e) 3 organization, wiJJ accept tax-deductible donations from
the public on behalf of the City and wiJJ transfer such funds to the City. The City acknowledges that NPF may deduct
actual expenses for an donations and a 5% service fee for each donation equal to or greater than $25. Remaining donated
funds wiJJ be held by NPF in a non-interest bearing account prior to transfer to the City.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTJΠRECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City to enter into an Agreement with
Northwest Parks Foundation to establish and manage the Parks Safety Net Fund for City Parks and Recreation
ProjeetslProgral11s for the collection of grants and private donations and forward to the fun City Council on May J 7,2005
for approval.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the Northwest Parks Foundation-Parks Safety Net Fund Management as
presented. "
~'~~~~ ~~~~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFF/ChI
----------------
- ----------------------
COlJNCJL ACTION:
D
D
0
0
APPROVED
DENIED
TABLEl)/J)](FERRED/NO ACrION
MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
CO1JNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
----------------
Enactment reading ,-----
ORDINANCE #
-----------
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
---- - ----- - u_-- u
-------
----
DATE:
TO:
May 9,2005
Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Council Committee
FROM:
Mary Faber, Recreation and Cultural Services Superintendent
David MOS~nager
Northwest Parks Foundation-Parks Safety Net Fund Management
VIA:
SUBJECT:
-------------- -u------
-----------
--.- ---------- -
- ----------------- --
Policy Question:
Should the City enter into an Agreement with Northwest Parks Foundation to collect and manage tax-
deductible grants and private donations on behalf of the City for Parks and Recreation
Projects/Programs and to transfer those funds to the City for use?
BackQround:
The Northwest Park Foundation is an umbrella 501 C-3 organization dedicated to advancing
countywide parks and recreation opportunities and facilities. NPF is a private, non-profit organization
established to promote healthy citizens and communities by protecting and encouraging the
enhancement and development of park and recreation facilities and resources for this and future
generations. Established in November of 2002, NPF designed the Parks Safety Net Program to
provide direct and indirect support to park and recreation agencies, school districts, and parks facility
user groups. NPF has a boundless service area with primary focus on agencies, school districts and
user groups geographically residing within King County and Snohomish County.
NPF, as a 501 (c) 3 organization, will accept tax-deductible donations from the public on behalf of the
City and will transfer such funds to the City. The City acknowledges that NPF may deduct actual
expenses for all donations and a 5% service fee for each donation equal to or greater than $25.
Remaining donated funds will be held by NPF in a non-interest bearing account prior to transfer to the
City.
Individual donations may be designated for specific City parks and recreation projects/programs.
Multiple accounts may be set-up to collect donations, grants
Options:
1). Authorize the City to enter into an Agreement with Northwest Parks Foundation to establish and
manage the Parks Safety Net Fund for City Parks and Recreation Projects/Programs for the
collection of grants and private donations.
2). Decline the proposal to enter into an Agreement with Northwest Parks Foundation to establish a
Parks Safety Net Fund.
Committee Recommendation:
Forward Option 1 to the full City Council on May 17, 2005 for approval.
APPROV AL OF COMMITTEE EP
d
ommittcc Chair
Programs
Parks Safety Net Fund
A new program providing resources for
agencies and organizations to manage en-
dowments and raise capital for park and rec-
reation improvement- projects.
.
Kathryn Taylor Equestrian Park
Maintenance and Operations
Endowment (S200,000)
King County Parks and Recreation
Safety Net Fund
.
City of Mercer Island Parks and Rec-
reation Fund.
.
Several park safety net funds for cit-
ies throughout the region are in de-
velopment. Visit nwparks.org for a
complete listing of projects.
Playfield Developments
.
South King County Regional Sports
Complex: Premiere example of King
County's "New Way of Doing Busi-
ness" and the Associated Development
and Operations Partnerships (ADOP)
program.
.
Seatde Magnuson Park Athletic
Complex and Wetland Habitat Restora-
t1on
Northshore Middle Schools: Linking
user groups and agencies for school
playfield improvements.
Linking
Corporations to
Par ks
How can businesses be socially re-
sponsible and maintain profitability?
Most consumers choose products and
services where proceeds are directed to
worthy causes.
Consumers want to know that in some
small way, their purchases help - not hurt
- their community.
Employees hope that the businesses they
work for do more for their communities.
Without healthy communities
healthy companies cannot exist.
Why support park facilities?
Companies wishing to be more socially
responsible need a strategic community
engagement plan that is in line with their
core values. Parks offer highly visible
community amenities that are not fully
supported by tax dollars alone. Let the
Northwest Parks Foundation help you
create a plan to increase your profitability
through socially responsible giving for
parks facilities.
Without healthy parks healthy
communities cannot exist.
Northwest Parks Foundation
,...,VISION ,...,
Facilitating healthy lives
through active recreation parks.
Northwest Parks Foundation
600 First Avenue, Suite 300
Seattle, Washington 98104
www.nwparks.org
206.838.7550
.~~~ Â
: ~t'.'~ Healthy Parks = Healthy People :&~
~. I..~ a~. .
""-. ~.'I <OJI"_"?:
.,.". .. -,.
. fk-. lilt
Mission
The Northwest Parks Foundation works to
support the parks, pools, trails, playfields,
and other active recreation facilities in the
region that help contribute to active,
healthy lifestyles.
. \Y/ e identify park system needs and address
them by providing direct financial support.
. We work to bring local business leaders,
user groups, funding organizations, and
community members together to finance
programs and facilities that you and your
family can use every day.
We serve as a voice of the community by
offering practical recommendations and
relevant information about park and rec-
reation issues to elected officials to ensure
that the public parks you visit best serve
your needs.
We are setting new standards
of excellence in park support.
Donations to )Jorthwest Parks Foundation,
a 50l(c)}corporation, are tax deductible.
-Achieving a Parks Renaissance~
The )Jorthwest Parks Foundation is a pri-
vate, charitable, non-profit organization
started in 2002 to address the severe lack of
funding for parks and recreation facilities.
Originally named "Friends of King County
Parks", we changed our name to reflect the
broader needs of the Pacific Northwest. It
is through the generous contributions of
individuals and corporations that we are
able to provide much-needed support for
the parks and recreation facilities in the
region.
\Xlith its creation, the Northwest Parks Foun-
dation has embarked on a course to achieve a
Parks Renaissance. \'Ç'e have a vision for
healthy parks that includes accessibility,
safety, features that encourage people to ex-
ercise or participate in active recreation, ade-
quate parking and lighting for use during
long winter months, and parks that have a
balance between refreshing undeveloped
open space and actively used trails and play
fields.
Our strategies include offering recommenda-
tions for long term maintenance and opera-
tions, implementing alternative development
strategies, and fiscal planning and endow-
ments that support our park facilities -->ithout
draining essential resources from other hu-
man serVIces.
We have plans to build self sustaining parks
using socially responsible corporate ventures
and are working to fund major capital im-
provements throughout the region.
@20O4 Northwest Parlls Foundation, All Rights Reserved
Your Community
By supporting the ~orthwest Parks Foun-
dation, you can contribute directly to parks
improvements and facilities in your own
neighborhood. You will help improve the
parks that you and your family regularly visit
and enrich your community by ensuring that
these magnificent resources will be available
for generations to come.
How You Can Help
You can make your contribution to the
:;\!orthwest Parks Foundation in several dif-
ferent ""vays:
.
Pledge your support to the Northwest
Parks Foundation as part of your Em-
ployee Giv--ing Campaign
Donate on our secure website,
www.nwparks.org
Mail your contribution directly to the
Foundation.
Donate other assets, stock, property,
etc. as part of your annual financial
planning.
Contact the ~PF for information about
a Family Legacy Park
.
.
.
.
Northwest Parks Foundation
Executive Director. Kristen Bush, MPH
(2M) 838- iS50 info@nwparks.org
".rww .n"'parks.o rg
~- QQ!tQ [~tlli!Lßi ght~--
PHILANTHROPY is based on voluntary action for the common good. It is a tradi-
tion of giving and sharing that is primary to the quality of life. To assure that phi-
lanthropy merits the respect and trust of the general public, and that donors and
prospective donors can have full confidence in the not-for-profit organizations and
causes they are asked to support, we declare that all donors have these rights:
------------------------------.
-.....---..--.....----....-
I.
VI.
1ò be informed of the organization's mission, of
the way the organization intends to
use donated resources, and of its capacity to use
donations effectively for their intended purposes.
1b be assured that information about
their donations is handled with respect and with
confidentiality to the extent provided by law.
II.
VII.
1ò be informed of the identity of those serving
on the organization's governing board,
and to expect the board to exercise prudent judgement
in its stewardshiP responsibilities.
1ò expect that all relationships with
individuals representing organizations of interest
to the donor will be professional in nature.
III.
VIII.
To have access to the organization's
most recent financial statements.
1èJ be informed whether those seeking
donations are volunteers, emPloyees of the
organization or hired solicitors.
Iv.
IX.
To be assured their gifts will be used for
lhe purposes for which they were given.
1ò have the opportunify for their
names to be deleted from mailing lists that
an organization may intend to share.
v.
x.
1ò receive appropriate
acknowledgement and recognition.
1ò feel free to ask questions when making
a donation and to receive promPI, truthful and
forthright answers.
.. .._-_.._--_._-_.._~- -
.....--..----...-...-..-------
DEVELOPED BY
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF FUND RAISING COUNSEl (AAFlK)
MSOCIATION FOR HEAI:rHCARE PHILANTtiROPY (AHI')
COUNCI~ FOR ADVANCEMENT AND SUPPORT OF EDUCA110N (CASE':)
ASSOCIATION OF FUNDRAISING PROFESSIONAlS (AFP)
ENDORSED BY
(IN FORMATION)
INUEPENDENT SECTOR
NATIONAL CATHOLIC DEVELOPMENr CONFERENCE (NCUC)
NATIONAL COMMlrTEE ON PLANNED GIVING (NCPG)
COUNCIL FOR RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT (CRU)
UNITED WAY OF' AMERICA
_-m._-",,".""" -.....-----
-_.~--_...._-"---_._-".""_..."-",,._-_..._............,,,,_.,,.. ......_..._-~--_........_-_......_------------
Pleasc help us distributc this widely.
MEETING DATE:
May 17,2005
ITEM# \/_--\j)-
CITY OF FEDERAl, WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUB.IECT:
Capital Fund Raising Campaign Proposal for thc new Community Center
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
[8] CONSENT
0 RESOLVTlON
0 CITY COUNCIL HlJSINESS
0 ORDJNANCIi:
0 l'UHLlC HEARING
0 OTH F:R
Amount Hudgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATT ACHMENTS: Committee action form dated May 9, 2005; Capital Fund Raising Campaign Proposal for the new
Community Center
"""""................"""""""""""""""...""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'""""""""""""""""'.......""""""""""..........,...............,....,.","'.,...............,.........................""""""""""................""""""""""'.........,....,..""""""",.,......."""""""""""""""""""""'.....'."'.""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""..""""""""""".",..,.............................""""
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: In November 2004, the Parks and Recreation Commission received citizen comment to
consider raising funds for currently unfunded items of the new Community Center, such as the track, climbing wall,
equipment and landscape improvements. In February 2005, the Commission voted to authorize the creation of a Sub~
Committee chaired by Don Dennis to create a Capital Fund Raising Campaign. The Sub~Committee of the Commission
was created and the Committee has met with City Staff, Project Architects and Northwest Parks Foundation to develop a
Campaign Proposal. Attached is the draft Campaign Proposal for review.
""""",,"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""..""....""""..". .""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
CITY COUNCJI"" COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City to enter into a Capital Fund Raising
Campaign as outlincd by the Fundraising Capital Fund Raising Campaign Proposal for the enhancement and improvement
of elements with a goal of $500,000 and forward to thy full City Council on May 17, 2005 for approval.
PH.OI'OSED MOTION: "} move approval of the Capital Fund Raising Campaign Proposal for the new Community
Center as presented."
.._--~._.."
"-'-~"-'.
-~..'.........-.-~-.'..'.'."..--._:-.""..
I,
--,.-" .. - . ..-
- --.--.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
. ,,----,,'-' ...-
,~,--~,,~~=
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFJ<1CB)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 AI'I'ROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLED/DEFEH.RED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
C01JNCIL BILL #
18..- reading
-----
Enactment reading ---
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
- --------.---..--...-
-----------
.---.---.-- u.--
REVIS"ED- 05t10t2001 ----
'._----"
..-------.
--"-'-'--__n._-
-----.------- -
-..-.---.--
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
_n----..- _no. --- ..---.. ..-----..... ---___on
DATE:
TO:
May 9,2005
Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Council Committee
FROM:
Mary Faber, Recreation and Cultural Services Superintendent
David MO~anager
Capital Fund Raising Campaign Proposal for the new Community Center
VIA:
SUBJECT:
---.....---..---....-....-- ----.-.-----.. -----..-.
....----.
.------.
Policy Question:
Should the City develop a Capital Fund Raising Campaign with a goal of $500,000 for enhancements
and improvement of elements of the new Community Center?
Backaround:
In November 2004, the Parks and Recreation Commission received citizen comment to consider
raising funds for currently unfunded items of the new Community Center, such as the track, climbing
wall, equipment and landscape improvements. In February 2005, the Commission voted to authorize
the creation of a Sub-Committee chaired by Don Dennis to create a Capital Fund Raising Campaign.
The Sub-Committee of the Commission was created and the Committee has met with City Staff,
Project Architects and Northwest Parks Foundation to develop a Campaign Proposal. An outline of
the Campaign strategy was shared with the Parks and Recreation.Commission in March to provide
information on work to date and get feedback. Attached is the draft Campaign Proposal for review.
Options:
1). Authorize the City to enter into a Capital Fund Raising Campaign as outlined by the Fundraising
Capital Fund Raising Campaign Proposal for the enhancement and improvement of elements
with a goal of $500,000.
2). Decline the proposal to enter into a Capital Fund Raising Campaign for the new Community
Center.
Committee Recommendation:
Forward Option 1 to the full City Council on May 17, 2005 for approval.
Ièdern.l ~y Community Center
Pmate Fundrnising & Capital ~ Proposal
April 27, 2005
Prepared for:
Gty of Federal Way Parks and Recreation Corrunission
Prepared by:
Campaign Advisors:
Kristen Bush, MPH - Executive Director
Northwest Parks Foundation
600 First Ave, Suite 300
Seattle, WA 98104
KrisH@nwparks.org
206-838-7550 or 206-718-1174
Stephanie Bowman - NPF Board
Brittney McBride - Project Coordinator, NPF Staff
Project Summary
The City of Federal Way Parks and Recreation Commission proposes to raise $500,000 over the next 12
months Gune 2005- May 2006) for ancillary support of the Federal Way Community Center. This capital
campaign is contingent upon Parks Commission and City Council approval. The campaign funds will
support several proposed features of the ongoing Community Center Development including: 1) specific
under-funded structural elements such as the senior lounge, classrooms, and party rooms; 2) equipment
such as activity, fitness and sports equipment, landscaping tools, signage, etc ; and 3) ambiance elements
such as landscaping needs (e.g. perennials and shrubbery), benches, kiosks for community notifications,
etc.. The fund drive will begin immediately upon approval.
DRAFT
The Development Plan
The Gty of Federal Way has committed $21,500,000 for the new community center. These public dollars will
support the development of the major structural elements of this public project. To supplement to supplement the
public construction budget, the Gty of Federal Way Parks and Recreation Commission proposes to raise $500,000
over the next 12 months constituting approximately 2% of total funded project.
The capital campaign funds are needed for 1) structural elements such as the jogging/walking track and climbing
waU2) furnishings for the senior lounge, teen area and classrooms; 2) equipment such as activity, fitness and sports
equipment and 3) ambiance elements/landscaping needs such as perennials, shrubbery and benches.
I. The Capital Campaign Plan
Overview - The four overlapping major elementS of the capital campaign plan include:
. NAMING GIFTS: Naming rights could be sold for 10 featured elements ($450,000)
. MAJOR GIFTS: From individuals, private foundations and corporations: See Gifts Chart ($ 100,000)
. Participating in Existing COMMUNITY EVENT(s): The fundraising goal for the segment is $10K
( -2% of total fund drive). 'IDe purpose of this event is to increase public auarerlf5s of the capital campaign and re-
ignite giving enthusiasm. In addition, community eventS will afford opportunities for smaller scale giving to the
Donor Fund Drive.
. DONOR FUND DRIVE: This component of the campaign might include the use of direct solicitation, facility
user support, other smaller scale giving actions and "item sales" in which individuals sponsor a specific item such
as teen room games, activities, fitness and sports equipment, landscape items and tools, benches, etc.
(Supplemental total)
I NAMING GIFTS (See Naming Gifts d:tart) - $ 450,000
MAJOR GIFTS (See Gift Range Chart) -$ 100,000
I COMMUNITY r':VI':Nrs - $ 10,000
I
I DONOR FUND DRIVE - $ Supplemental I
2
Capital Campaign Preparation:
Upon approval of the campaign proposal, the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Staff will begin
mobilization for the capital campaign. This includes assigning leadership responsibilities, budget development, web
site development, mobilization of volunteers, preparing a case statement, brochures and other campaign
promotional materials (i.e. pledge cards and thank you notes), background infonnation for solicitors, copies of
design and other renderings from the city, pictures, press releases and if appropriate a prospectus. The budget
should include estimated expenses for staff, campaign support materials, postage, parking, incidental costs, donor
acknowledgements and signage and a plan to coœr tim: cantir7rp¡Lpkdg:s and thŒe pledfF that are not fidly reAlized.
During the period estimated from June 2005 through August 2005 lead gifts will be recruited and a public relations
plan if appropriate and required by the City will be developed and coordinated with City staff. In addition, a book
keeping system specific to the campaign will be established. The campaign kick off will be August 2005.
NAMING GIFTS
Most of the naming gifts for the 10 identified elements will be recruited prior to the public announcement of the
campaign. Prospect research will need to be completed and a draft list of interested or potentially interested
individuals or corporations will be presented by May 15th. For the most pan, locally owned business owners,
developers, and local philanthropists will be primary targets. National level sponsors and corporate giving will serve
as a back up plan but normally take much longer to acquire. If naming gifts do not materialize, the campaign for
major gifts will be shored up in an effort to cover the difference. See more information about naming recruitment
under "Major Gifts" below.
No.'" I-FeatUrea'Eïeïnent~--' ¡Value m r-~:~ingm .... ¡ ~~~1ing ~~:å:~ts
r-i"---' Lcisure Pool I~ri ,500,666-_m--.. 1-$T56:6ÖÖmm r--$fŠ-6~666--I-_m~ 20 mm_-"-
2 J ,ap Pool 500,0000 [$166,Ö6Ö 1 12š6,666 ... 20
3 Gym ]~ay 508,000 r-$m56:ÖÖÖmm r-$3-66:õ66'-~
4 IFrm~~~ 400,000 40,000 $340,000
5 r-Mclt~i)~q;¿;~e-R;;õ¡;;m_m r$m266: OOOmm mm- [lm25':Ö66-'~ r $ 3 65~6õ6-m
6 Running Track 287,000 r-"$.m'2'5:OÖÖI$39Ö:OÖÖ--
[mi'- ... rkrõbrc~.m"mmmm "'" ['$mm275:ÖÒO .. $ 25,000 [m$4i5;66ó-' '" 10
rs---rS~;;ior L~~~g-¿-'---~-[Cfoo:ooo ---[$-- 20,000 --I $435,000 '[--10'--¡r
9 ra~~i~¿;rnmmmm"m 100,000 [$16:066 /'$445:666m- 5
10 [""Party R;;¿;¡;;_.m.._...___m_---r$----m-40~ÖÖ6'mm_-/$---5,000-1 $450,000--- 5
~-----_m;q)~ospe~t~~-f~r-naïmng gift~~añ';nd-~r;;~~i;p witfisom~ Major gifts pr;spem~ts.
Prospects
Total::'
20
40
55
70
80
90
100
110
115
120
--"m--_."--"""
3
MAJOR GIFTS
MAJOR Gnt}'s RANGE CHART
Goal: $100,0000
Number of Cumulative Prospects Prospects Gift Size Recognition Cumulative
Gifts Gifts Needed Cumulative Level Total
1 1 6 6 $20,000 Jeweler'} $20,000
1 2 6 12 $15,000 Diamond $35,000
2 4 8 20 $10,000 Platinum $55,000
4 8 15 35 $ 5,000 Gold $75,000
5 13 20 55 $ 3,000 Silver $90,000
10 23 30 85 $ 1,000 Bronze $100,000
'}Please note... this is intended to add humor. The group could have more fun with these levels.
Foundations
Paid staff and volunteers will identify foundations with a history of supporting civic projects and programs,
recreation or organized indoor sports, walking and senior citizen health, wellness, and other related programs by
using the Secretary of State's register of charitable foundations, Foundation Center software and other prospecting
resources provided by the King County or Seattle Library Fundraising Resource Center(s). The dty of Federal Way
Parks and Recreation Commission select dty leaders and local civic group leaders (e.g. Rotary dubs, YMCA, etc)
members will be asked to contribute guidance and advocacy for grant proposals. In all cases where individual gifts
(below) are offered, donors will be asked to co-sign and/ or endorse grant applications made to their places of work
where appropriate.
Cotporntions
To research corporate prospects, paid staff and volunteers will consult the Puget Sound Business Joumallists and
research web sites for names of corporate giving officers. Northwest Parks Foundation staff can assist with creating
a target contact list and corporate giving officers will be systematically contacted. In some cases, challenge grants
will be solicited.
In addition, senior groups, art and music groups, adult athletes or parents of youth athletes could be asked to co-
sign and/ or endorse corporate giving from their places of work. In addition, Parks commission members will be
asked for direct contact information for executives of identified corporations.
Individuals
Other individual major donors will be recruited via presentations and general mailings where emails are unattainable
to individuals involved in arts groups, senior groups, civic groups, sports leagues and other local park and recreation
related organizations. Whenever possible, individual contributions will be used in matching programs from
corporations. In all cases where individual gifts are offered, donors will be asked if their companies offer matching
gifts.
4
COMMUNITY EVENTS
Throughout the summer, the Gty of Federal Way hosts events where capital campaign organizers will set up booths
advertising the campaign. Examples of events could include, the Fourth of July Celebrations, Summer concert
series, and other previously established community events. The purpose here is to increase public exposure to the
capital campaign, educate Federal Way residents regarding the potential of in-kind contributions towards the
development, recruit more volunteers half way through campaign, present progress charts, acquire corporate
sponsorship, generally facilitating a community fundraising atmosphere. It could also help reinforce the need for a
community center! Event goal $10,000.
Concessions and other fundraising materials will be sold during the events (T-shirts, etc). In addition, a request for
the email addresses of interested adult participants will be requested. The event could include public appearances
by local pubic personalities, Federal Way officials and/or if appropriate a major donor honoring ceremony. To help
fund the event, sponsors will be asked to support ad11Únistrative and logistical staff. Other businesses could be
asked to offer in-kind printing costs, promotional costs and/or to offer employee volunteers and provide prizes. A
brainstorming session could reveal unique ideas around the community event.
DONOR FUND DRIVE: Throughout the term of the capital campaign, smaller-scale giving will be coordinated
by volunteers. Smaller scale giving will be encouraged at the community event primarily, however other strategies
for smaller scale events to encourage giving throughout the campaign 11Úght include:
1) Phone-athon:
2) Direct Mail Solicitation
3) Community Center Members: (would need a better name for this) these people could be solicited monthly
online making it easier for them to use a VISA and give more frequently.
4) "Item sales" or the use of a "gifts catalogue" Individuals or families 11Úght sponsor a specific item such as
teen room games, activities, art equipment, fitness and sports equipment, landscape items and tools, benches, etc.
In all cases, volunteers will try to recruit matching dollars from all donors' places of work. Staff will also ask one or
more foundations, corporations, or individuals for matching funds for item sales over a particular period. of time or
for a particular element.
Capital Campaign Contributor Recognition
It is essential that contributions are recognized in an appropriate manner and are in compliance with any established
Federal Way public na11Úng policies. Using the precedent established by the Seattle Center and the Seattle Center
Foundation, the following types of recognition could be offered to the Capital Campaign donors:
NAMING GIFTS: All na11Úng gifts for community center elements: Signs at each element, along entry paths and
directional signs at main entrance, possibly Gty directional signs depending upon existing policies.
MAJOR GIFTS: Wall of Fame - Put up a wall of plaques with names of the donors engraved. Children from art
classes could be asked to create "thank you" tiles in support of the future art program(s)? They could all be the
same size but would be located on the wall based upon the si7e of the donation. There could be a business section
and an individual section.
FUND RAISING EVENI"S: The Community Event will be named after major sponsor, individual booths and
gathering areas would feature banners with corporate/business logos and promotional materials.
SUSTAINING DRIVE GIFTS: "Purchasers" of items will be recognized on an acknowledgment page of the
website and possibly in regular community center newsletters and/or mailings. Kiosks could have donor
recognition plagues for substantial volunteers.
VOLUNTEER RE CX::X;NITI ON: The Steering committee should have an agenda item to consider ways to
recognize volunteers and identify landmark achievements.
5
Campaign Staff Organization
Operational Support Needs
Staff
50% campaign coordinator
25% administrative and management staff
10% city staff support
15% volunteer based committed office support
In-Kind Gty Staff Support and! or Salary funded as part of
Support
In~ Kind Gty Support
In-Kind Gty Staff Support
In- Kind Parks and Recreation Commission and Community
Volunteers
Other Sources of Campaign Support:
Volunteers will commit to the following support actions.
1) Attendance at monthly campaign status meetings (1 hour each).
2) Attendance at other related meetings on an as needed basis (up to 2 hours each).
3) Commitment to an additional two hours per week telephoning, emailing, and providing other assistance for
volunteer and paid staff.
4) Public appearances, especially at fundraising events.
5) Recruitment of at least one local celebrity for the community event.
6) Commitment to signing at least 50 thank you letters monthly on behalf of the campaign.
7) Personal commitment to support the project in any amount that is personally significant.
8) Assistance with recruitment of one naming or major gift.
Operational Support Sources
Operational support for capital campaign staff will come from two sources:
1.
Federal Way Gty staff: The will allocate 5% F1E funded through city administrative budget, work will be
conducted at the staff's allocated workspace. The Gty will also provide access to equipment and incidental
amenities for campaign staff and volunteers.
2.
Any paid staffwill need to be covered by the campaign or volunteer commitments in the equivalent.
A Volunteers
Volunteers will be led by the Federal Way Park Commission (FWPq.
Volunteer staff will be asked to commit to a minimum of 2 hours per week for the campaign period and will be
drawn from the boards, staff, and parent volunteers of existing civic groups or other interested parties.
Volunteer staff will be organized into the following three committees, which will meet monthly and as needed.
1. Steering Committee: Recruit volunteer staff, communicates with FWPc, organize agendas for other committees,
and fundraise for operations. This group will represent all of the interested parties and surrounding areas and will be
responsible for coordinating volunteer groups. This includes development of volunteer sustaining strategies and
general volunteer coordination. This committee should meet at least once per week throughout the campaign.
Skill sets: leadership, organization, motivation, public speaking, community connections.
2. Community Event Committee: Assist the FWPC in all aspects of the event. Help recruit, train, and supervise
volunteer staff. This group of volunteers will also help acquire and coordinate sponsorship. 1he community event
committee chair should meet with the steering committee and with the community event committee twice monthly
and on an as needed basis.
Skill sets: social involvement, past event experience, creativity, positive energy, organization.
3. Grants and Prospect Research Committee: This more independent group of volunteers will assist paid staff and
board members with identification of funding prospects and writing letters of intent and draft proposals to
6
foundations, corporations, and individuals. It is important to note that volunteers on this committee may not be
expected to "ask" for donations.
Skill sets: Research, librarians, past fund raising or grant writing experience or willingness to learn, TIME,
V. Schedule and sequence
A Proposed Capital Campaign Timeline
Month
May
June
'July
August
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Week- 1-
. Ãpprove Capital _n__~
Campaign
. Research Prospects
~repa~~_~~~ria~___n_----
. Recruit lead gifts
FOUR1H OF JULY
EVENT
. Recruit lead gifts
. Event planning
preparation
.-Þwd Raising Kick off
announcement
. Event planning
- _£!:eparatIon__-- -
BREAK if needed.
Volunteer motivation
,meeting if ne~~~9
. Recruit gifts
. Event planning
~~~tion
TBA
-----
TBA
TBA
TBA
-'reA-
TBA
Ri~§.on C,;;tting E vent?-
B. Critical steps
TBA TBA HOLIDAY
- --_n_____- --______n______------------------- --
TEA TBA HOLIDAY
Reorganization m~~tmg TBÃ-- TBA
Redefine goals,
acknowlede ro ress
TBA
TEA
TBA
Week 2
-- . Research Prospects
. Prepare materials
. Recruit lead giftS----
; Recnùt lead gifts
. Event planning
preparation
--; Recruit gifts
. Event planning
preparation
- . Recnùt gifts
. Event planning
- n_~ratIon ___n___- --
____n______n_----
Week 3
-.-Recruit lead gifts
. Prepare materials
. Recruit Íead- gifts
. Modify Plan
. RecruitT~¡d - gifts
. Event planning
preparatIon
;; Recnùt gifts
. Event planning
preparatIon
---- ----______n_--_---_-
. Recruit gifts
. Event pla~l11ing
--_P~~P~~~<?_!1- - - ---
. Recovery BREAK
. Revisit Plan, modify
--- ____n____________n______------------
TEA
TEA
TEA
-------------- -- -
Week 4
. Recruit lead gIftS ----------
. Prepare materials
. Recnùt l~adgIft~------
. Event planning
preparatIon
. Hire Staff if lanned
. Recnùt lead gifts -
. Event planning
preparation
. Recruit gifts
. Event planning
preparatIon
. Recnùt gifts
. Event planning
- pr~paration
TEA based on plan
modification
_____n__-
-------
______n_-
TEA
TEA
- - -
Conclude
-----------______n____nn_-- _n______------------- ___n______-----______n__- -- --- ---
1) Finalize and approve fundraising plan
2) Steering committee meets and sets up Goals Table (see sample below)
3) Next... see if draft plan is on right track first.
7
MEETING DATE:
May 19,2005
ITEM# ý(!)
----- ----. - -", "'" "-"--------"""""'- ",-,------,,"'. """ "",-------"'" ""'",,--...--,,_._,, .,-,--...-----"""""~, -_...----""'"",,,
-""""-~--- --,--,-"'. ,...,...__.."-",."--",,~-------,,,.,, """",,-"'.....-----,
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement
-"".."............-.........---......"""""",... ......---.....-......"""..."".....-----..".."""",."..-----.".....-""-..-""",,...""""---------""'-""'.-"""""""'-"""-----"-""""""""""'" ----""""""'-"""~--'.""""""'----------------""."""""""""""""....."""""""
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
X CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
'" "",..""---...---.."",, "'" -----------"-,,, -" """"""-"-"---"" ,,"',,"',,----"',,"',,--.,., -- -"""'-'------"_. """'.......- ---""'""",,--_..._--,,.,.,. """"--_.'."'---------" """""...,-,,~-- -------...-...... -..."" ""
A TT ACHMENTS: PRHS&PS Memo, Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement, Federal Annual Certification Report.
..-....-......"" """""""'... --.....-...... -.. ..,,_..'" """" "........---.....-...." """"'-----.. ---.."" ..."...---- --.. "'-""...." .........-...--- .........--.............."..""... -.. ....._..._--".._---_..._".."..""....",...__.._-------""""",,-~----_.........".. ""'" "-,,... ----- -"'---."""""'" .."" -" ."'--.
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement expires on September of2005. Renewal of
the agreement will extend our agreement until September 2008.
The Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement and submission of the Federal Certification Report are prerequisites to the
distribution of equitably shared cash, proceeds, and property.
...-..--...-...- -..""" -".... -.... ...---.....- --...---"..'" "" ""'""..,, ------"-------"-"""""-""...-...--...-""."""""", - - -.. "."..." "",..--"-----..-"..",,... -" ""......-..-......------..",... ."""" """"""'---~-"'-""""-""-"'------'" ""._----",.,., """""""",,-,,--------_..._... -""", '" ......"" ..--
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
..-- - - ..._" -""" """""""--"'--"""""""'" ,...".."...------......",-.., "'" "",-",,--""""'--"".""'" ,,-, ---- --.. -"...,..... .....----~ -..... -..., """"""'----""'-"'."""""""""""""---"'--." """"'" ""...---------"..-""""." ""-'-----""'.""""""""'-"-"'--"""---"-"'-"'-"""""", """"""""-"'-"'-""
PROPOSED MOTION: I move approval of the Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement
~~~~;-~-~----~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinunces only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/10t2001
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCil., COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
May 09,2005
PRHS&PS
VIA: David anager . /
FROM: a 1L
SUBJECT: Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement Renewal
Policy Question
Renewal of Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement and submission of Federal Annual Certification
Report.
Background
The Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement expires in September of 2005. The request should be
submitted to both U.S. Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury by June 1,2005.
Once accepted the new agreement will run through September 2008. Submissions of the Federal
Equitable Sharing Agreement and Federal Annual Certification Report are prerequisites to the
distribution of equitably shared cash, proceeds, and property.
Options
1. I am recommending that the council approve the application for renewal.
2. The only other option is to not approve the renewal.
1
Staff recommendation
[Insert the option you reconunend, in the fonn of a motion]
Conunittee recommendation
Forward option -.-L to the full City Council for approval on [insert the Council meeting date you
recommendf <~/l7 /ð.s:- (
..."..,..,.
."..",.,.,
. . 0;...'..
2
U.S- Deparmenl of JusticelACA Program U.S. Departmenl of the Treasury
10th and Constitution Avenue. NW Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture
Criminal DivisiontAFMLS 740 15th Streel. NW. Suite 700
Bond Building. Tenth Floor Wasninglon. D.C. 20220 " .
Wasnington. DC 20530 E-mail address: lreas.aca@teoaf.treas.gov
Fax: (202) 616-1344 Fax: (202) 622-9610.
~w}nforcement Agency; -:¡::du-d U~fj ~'(~d r yJLI)ý!ú. LJt# (J
~Iicc Dc:partmml 0 Sheriff's Offiœ/Dqlartn'ml 0 ask Fon:<: I.n...... of_.""') 0 Proscculor's om a Other
; ontact Person: (In Íl/1 It..JÍ1sðt - 7)' fJ~ f1.h f -cf E-mail Address: br í IU1 ~ ú) ÙSNI t€ t!ily ¥T' -Ì" d // /7 J 1<JtVf- ~
AaillngAddress: (Sired)!'/) gi))(97//J (Cily)~dJtlll-'- k¥'l ($Iale) l(Ja . (Zip Code) 7R/)/dJ.9:;r/êJ
elephone Number:~) 8".35.. r; 7lJ I Fax Number: ( t~J; - 8.3 S... C, 7 j 9
\gency FIscal Year Ends on: (MomhtDaylYcar) 1:/ lJI/tJ ¥ NCIC/ORlfTr;¡cking No.: -..W..fJ,Øí 1.3 (,~
Su,;:::::r y:fa~~~~tl~~I~ÕI? ACtì~ity
Justice Funds
Beginning Equitable Sharing Fund Balance ....-...-................................--........$ 02/1//)7'1./9
FederaISharingFundsReceived...........-_............-._.'.._--............-.-_._--.-.. $ ø
Transrers From Other Law Enforcement Agencies (attach list) ,."""""."."",."".",.,.,., S pf'
::':'::':'~;';;';~tÖ;~~;;';';';';~;';;;':~~~;~;;;';~;)..... ... ....... .... ............. ~ ~:r;~wP
Total Equitable Sharing Funds (total oflines I ~5) ...'.""""..'."..'...""---"'...'.....' $ ':;'/.3. '15.,,"5
FederaISharingFundsSpent(totaloflinesa~n)_........-_._.........:..........-........-... $( /5/}.000 )
Equitable Sharing Fund B,alan¡:e (subtl1lct line 7 from line 6) '.'..."....'....... - . - - ... .$ ¿.~J.""t)
Appraised Value of Other Assets Re¡:eived ...- -.........---............-.-.--- -.,.....$ ~-
Summary of Shared Monies Spent
Federal Annual Certification Report
This Annual Certification Report must De submitted wkhió 60 days after Ine clOse of your fiscal year 10 botn agencies:
.....
",....
Tolal spent on salaries for new. temporary, not to exceed I-year employees. . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . - , .. $
Totalspcntonovertime ...--.-.-...-.-.......- _....................-.-...-.- ---... $
Tolalspentoninformantand"buymoney" .... _...........------.-..-------_._-_........ $
Totalspentontravelandtraining-...- .----.............................- S
Total spenl on communications and computers - . . . . . . - $
Tolalspentonfirearmsandweapons.--._.- -......................., $
Total spent on body annor and protective gear. . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - S
Total spent on electronic surveillance equipment. - . - - . . - . . . . . . . . . . - - - $
Totalspentonbuildingandimprovements..- _.........-.-- -................. . S
Total spent on drug education and awareness programs. - - - - . . . . . . . . . . - $
Total spent on other law enforcement expenses (attach list) - . . . . . . . . . . . - $
Tolal transfers to other law enforcement agençies (auach list of recipients) . . . - . - $
Tolal permissible use ITansfers (up to IS percent) (auach list of recipients) - - . - . . - . - S
Amount ofline (m) translèrred to and used for drug abuse treatment
d . ......-
an prevention programs. . . . - . . . . . . - . .. s /"
Total spent on matching grants (attach list) - . - . . - . . . . . . - . - - . - .. $
Total annual law enforcement budget for your jurisdiction for current fiscal year. - . . . . - . . . $ /ft" 81(, i ~ 7.3
~::: :::::: ::~:r:::::;:":;:::-;:~ :::i::::i~ ;::;...:~::;:. . . . . . . . . . . . . :=11 ~~lt9
Total annual budget for non. law enforcement agencies for prior fiscal year - -. -.. - - - - - - -. $-- ~ - ~~
;'
",....
.....
;'"
",.....
/'
;"
;"
.....
......
---
Treasury Funds
$ -
$ .....
$ .....
$ .....
$ .....
$ /'
$( r
$ ......
$ ....-
$ /'"
$ ,...
$ ....-
$ /'
S ';'"
$ ....-
S /
S ....-
$ ......
$ --
$ ;'"
$ ",....
$
......--
Iderthe penally of perjury. the undcrsignal hereby ecrllfy that the ¡nfom,alion in Ihis report is an accur:JIC a"ounlln~ uf funds n:ccivcd and spent by Ihe law enforçancnl.
cncy under Ihe fcdcml equitable sharing program dunng this reporting "","jod.
"c (Print or Type) ff,CyYI/ l.Jhflv). ~~ ch-/.
EDr""",.."", "C""<Y 1100<1 or" _i«d R."...",",....c
Date .7/ð3/.f-
, ,f
Name
¡¡UUre:
..
Title:
, form is subjccllO Ihe Freedom of Informal ion Acl and may be rçleascd under 5 U-S.C § 552. See W'o\"\v.u.doi-~ov/n"u;naVali"I$.hlml for .additi~nal foous- _.Iõ1~_"~
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR TERRORIST FINANCING
AND FINANCIAL CRIME
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR ASSET FORFEITURE
740 15TH ST. N.W., SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, D.c. 20220
TELEPHONE: (202) 622-9600
FAX: (202) 622-9610
APR - 8 2£Œi
Dear State and Local Law Enforcement Agency:
The Departments of Treasury and Justice are again doing a joint mailing of the agreement
and certification forms as a means of reducing paperwork for your agency. The new "Valid
thru September 30, 2008" Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement and the revised Federal
Annual Certification Report are the same forms, which should be submitted to both
Treasury and Justice. Highlights of these reporting requirements are:
}> The Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement shall be submitted every three years.
The enclosed agreement, which is due by October 1, 2005, will be effective through
September 30, 2008. The head of the law enforcement agency and the head of the
governing body (or authorized representative) must sign the agreement. A new
àgreement should be submitted anytime there is a change in administration at the
head of the law enforcement agency or governing body level. Early submission of
your Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement will ensure that there is no lapse in your
agency's compliance status.
};> The Federal Annual Certification Report is due no later than 60 days after the. close
of the requesting agency's fiscal year. The head of the law enforcement agency and
the head of the governing body (or authorized representative) must sign the
certification report. A new participant is not required to submit a certification
repoFf.until shared cash, proceeds, or property is received.
Due to the high volume of paperwork that will be received during this renewal process,
please either mail or fax your form. There is no need to do both.
}> Revised Guidelines: The Department of the Treasury Guide to Equitable Sharing for
Foreign Countries and Federal, State, and Local Law Enforcement Agencies was
revised April 2004. You may download copies of the revised Guide from our website
www.treas.Qov/officeslenforcemenVteoaf. Once on the site double-click on Guidelines.
}> Electronic Funds Transfer: As of May 2004, the Department of Treasury no longer
issues payments via check. All Department of the Treasury payments will be made via
Automated Clearing House (ACH). Please download the enrollment form from our
website if you have not enrolled or if a change has occurred with your financial
institution information since you last filed your form. Forward the completed Treasury
Enrollment Form to the Indianapolis, Indiana address provided on the form. The
Department of Treasury and Justice do not share financial entities. The enrollment
process will be handled separately. Refer to the enclosed Department of Justice letter
for instructions regarding the Justice process.
(Ij
};> Paid: PAID is a system developed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial
Management System (FMS) to provide participating federal agencies a method of
making remittance information available to their vendors through the intemet. The
system is free of charge to registered vendors with internet access. The Department
of the Treasury participates in this program. The type of information vendors can
obtain from PAID are limited to the following: date of payment, payment amount. and
invoice number. If your agency is interested in receiving information via the PAID
system, you must go to the website www. fms.treas.Qov/afc and fill out a registration
form.
-,
The equitable sharing guidelines for Treasury and Justice are basically the same except
for our policy on the transfer of equitably shared money. Treasury does not allow state or
local law enforcement recipients to transfer shared cash to nonprofit community
organizations except in "windfall" situations. Justice has the 15 percent permissible use
policy and does not allow any transfer of cash. For more information on the Treasury
policy, refer to pages 25. 26 and 27 of the Treasury Guide to Equitable Sharing (April
2004).
Although you are receiving only one mailing of the forms, the Federal Equitable Sharing
Agreement and the Annual Certification Report must be submitted to both the Department
of the Treasury and the Department of Justice at the addresses listed below:
U.S. Department of the Treasury
Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture
740 15th Street, NW
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20220
E-mail address:
www. tress. Qov/offices/enforcemenUteoaf
Or treas.aca(åtteoaf.treas.Qov
Fax: (202) 622-9610
U.S. Department of Justice
Criminal Division
Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section
ACA Program
10th and Constitution Avenue, NW
Bond Building. Tenth Floor
Washington, DC 20530.
E-mail address: www.afmls.aca@usdoj.gov
Fax: (202) 616-1344
The enclosed agreement and certification forms must be completed and returned by the
stated deadlines in order for your agency to remain in compliance with the equitable
sharing guidelines. These foons are also on our website along with other forms and
information about the Treasury asset forfeiture program.
Please contact Jackie Jackson or Kim Tyler at (202) 622-9600 should you have questions
regarding the reporting requirements.
Sincerely.
~E.. ~\~~
Enclosure
Eric E. Hampl
Acting Director
I)
u.s. Department of Justice
Criminal Division
Washington. D.c. 10$30
APR-8tmi
Dear State arid Local Law Enforcement Agency:
Your current Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement will expire this September. To allow
for your continued participation in the equitable sharing program, please complete the enclosed
Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement. The new agreement is valid through September 30, 2008
and should be submitted by June 1,2005.1 Since all incoming mail is sanitized and irradiated
prior to delivery, early submission of your Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement will ensure that
there is no lapse in your agency's compliance starns.
The Federal Annual Certification Report, also attached, is due 60 days after the close of
your agency's fiscal year. The signed certification report is valid for one year and must be
submitted each year, regardless of whether your agency received shared funds. Submission of
the Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement and Federal Annual Certification Report are
prerequisites to the distribution of equitably shared cash, proceeds, and property.
The Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement and Annual Certification Report must be
signed by the head of your law enforcement agency and the head of your governing body. The
Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section receives nwnerous inquiries regarding who is
authorized to sign as the governing body head. For equitable sharing purposes, a governing body
is the person or entity that has legislative authority to approve your agency's annual budget.
Examples of govenùng body heads include city manager, mayor, city council chairperson, county
executive, county council chairperson, director, secretary, administrator, commissioner, and
governor. Law enforcement officials should not sign as the governing body head.
If you need additional copies of the Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement or Federal
Annual Certification Report, the fonDS may be downloaded from the Department of Justice
website at www.usdoi.gov/criminal/afmls.htmi. If your agency does not have Internet access,
please retain a blank copy of the enclosed fonDS for future use.
Any questions regarding reporting requirements and procedures may be directed to Junior
Financial Analyst Lisa Trueblood at (202) 616-0702 or to the Law Enforcement Coordinating
Committee (LECC) Manager in your district's U.S. Attorney's Office.
1 If there is a change in adtpinistration at your agency or governing body, a new
agreement must be submitted.
-2-
In addition to forwarding the new Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement and Federal
Annual Certification Report, I want to infonn you that the United States Marshals Service
(USMS) is changing the way it disburses equitable sharing funds. Rather than issuing Treasury
checks, USMS will disburse equitable sharing via Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT). This
transition will take approximately a year to complete and will be implemented one state at a time.
The USMS will send an Automated Clearing House Vendor Payment Enrollment Form to all
program participants to collect the banking infonnation needed to transmit equitable sharing
electronically. The completed enrollment fonn should be forwarded to Booth Management
Consulting, LLC. Questions regarding EFT may be directed to the USMS at
E.Share.HeID(â>.usdoi.gov or (202) 307-9205.
Enclosures
Sincerely,
c vV~
~r, Chief
Asset Forfeiture and Money
Laundering Section
Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement
VALID THRU SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
~S ';,X-(~!' I;
j;~:~:-"«":_:f<.~,
;--,' -- i~',
;: I, .. ;~-
:",;. -',-." ,
~~":~::::.::;.-_.;/t
17~q
Law Enforcement Agency:
0 Check if New Participant
0 Police Department
0 Sheriff's OfficclDcpartmcnt
0 Task Force (....,¡, jot or..........)
0 Prosecutor's Office
0 Other
Contact Person:
E-mail Address:
Mailing Address: '
(Street)
(City)
(State:)
(Zip Code)
Telephone Number: (
Fax Number:
Agency Fiscal Year Ends on:
NCIC/ORlrrracking No.:
(MonthlDay)
llis Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement entered into among (I) the Federal Government, (2) the above-stated law enforcement agency,
and (3) the governing body sets forth the requirements for participation in the federal equitable sharing program and the resttictions upon
the use of federally forfeited cash, property, proceeds, and any interest earned thereon, which are equitably shared with participating law
enforcement agenc\es. By their signatures, the parties agree that they will be bound by the statutes and guidelines that regulate shared assets
and the following requirements for participation in the federal equitable sharing program.
1. Submission. The Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement and the Federal Annual Certification Report must be submitted to both
the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury with a copy provided to the U.S. Attorney in the district in which
the recipient law enforcement agency is located, in accordance with the instructions received from the respective departments or
as outlined in their equitable sharing guidelines.
Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section
U.S. Departtnent of Justice
lOth and Constitution Avenue, NW
Bond Building, 10'" Floor
Washington, DC 20530
Fax: (202) 616~1344
E-mail address: afm)s.aca(âhrsdoÎ.20V
Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture
U.S. Department of the Treasury
740 15th Street, NW
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20220
Fax: (202) 622-9610
E-mail address: treas.aca(â?teoaf.treas.gOV
2. Signatories. llis agreement must be signed by the head of the law enforcement agency and the head of the governing body.
Examples oflaw enforcement agency heads include police chief, sheriff, director, commissioner, superintendent, administrator,
chairperson, secretary, city attorney, county attorney, district attorney, prosecuting attorney, state attorney, commonwealth
attorney, and attorney general. Examples of governing body heads include city manager, mayor, city council chairperson, coUnty
executive, county council chaÍIperson, director, secretary, administrator, conunissioner, and governor. Receipt of the signed
agreement is a prerequisite to receiving any equitably shared cash, property, or proceeds.
3. Uses. My shared asset shall be used for law enforcement purposes in accordance with the statutes and guidelines that govern
equitable sharing and as specified in the equitable sharing request (either a DAG~71 or a TDF 92-22.46) subßÚtted by the
requesting agency.
4. Transfers. Before the undersigned law enforcement agency transfers cash, property, or proceeds to other state or local law
enforcement agencies, it must verify fIrSt that the receiving agency has a CUITent and valid Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement
on file with both the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury. If there is no agreement on file, the undersigned
law enforcement agency must obtain one from the receiving agency and forward it to the Departtnent of Justice and the
Department of the Treasury as in item I. A list of recipients and the amount transferred must be attached to the Federal Annual
Certification Report.
April 2005
5. Internal Controls. The parties agree to account separately for federal equitable sharing funds received ûom the Department
of Justice and the Department of the Treasury. Funds from state and local forfeitures and other sources must not be commingled
with federal equitable sharing funds. The recipient agency shall establish a separate revenue account or accounting code for state,
local, Department of Justice, and Department of the Treasury forfeiture funds. Interest income generated must be accounted for
in the appropriate federal forfeiture fund account
The parties agree that such accounting will be subject to the standard accounting requirements and practices employed for other
public monies as supplemented by requirements set forth in the CUlTent edition of the Department of Justice' s A Guide to Equitable
Sharing of Federally Foifeited Property for State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies (Justice Guide). and the Departtnent of
the Treasury's Guide to Equitable Sharing for Foreign Countries and Federal. State, and Local Law Enforcement Agencies
(Treasury Guide). The accounting of shared funds must be reported on the Annual Certification Report.
The misuse oMIlÌsapplication of shared resources or the supplantation of existing resources with shared assets is prohibited.
Failure to comply with any provision of this agreement shall subject the recipient agency to the sanctions stipulated in the current
edition of the Justice or Treasury Guides, depending on the source of the funds or property.
6. Federal Annual Certification Report. The recipient agency shall submit an Annual Certification Report to the Departtnent
of Justice and the Department of the Treasury (at the addresses shown in item I) and a copy to the U.S. Attorney in the district
in which the recipient agency is located. The certification must be submitted in accordance with the instructions received ûom
the respective departments or as outlined in the Justice or Treasury Guides. Receipt of the certification report is a prerequisite
to receiving any equitably shared cash, property. or proceeds.
7. Audit Report. Audits will be conducted as provided by the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular
A-133. The Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury reserve the right to conduct periodic random audits.
8a. During the past 3 years, has your agency been found In violation of, or entered Into a settlement agreement
pursuant to, any nondiscrimination law In federal or state court, or before an administrative agency?
aVes
0 No
(If you answered yes, attach relevant information. See instructions.)
8b. Are there pending in a federal or state court, or before any federal or state administrative agency, proceedings
against your agency alleging discrimination?
OVes
ONo
(If you answered yes, attach relevant information. See instructions.).
The undersigned certify that the recipient agency is in compliance with the nondiscrimination requirements of the following
laws and their Depll~ment of Justice implementing regulations: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(42 U.S.c. § 2000a 'f seq.), Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 V.S.C. § 1681 et seq.), Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794), and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.), which
prohibit discrimination on the basis ofrace, color. national origin, disability, or age in any federally assisted program or
activity, or on the basis of sex in any federally assisted education program or activity.
Under penalty of peljury. the undersigned officials certify that the recipient state or local law enforcement agency is in
compliance with the provisions of the Justice and/or Treasury Guides and the National Code of Professional Conduct for
Asset Forfeiture.
Name (Print or Type) Date
Law Enforcement Agency Head
Name (Print or Type)
Governing Body Head
Date
Signature:
Signature:
Title:
Title:
This form is subject to the Freedom of Information Act and may be released under 5 U.S.C. § 552.
See www.usdoi.lZovtcriminaVafmls.html or www.tn:aU':ovtofficcslcnforccmentlteoaf for additional forms.
April 2005
Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement Instructions
Law Enforcement Agency: Enter the complete name of your state or local law enforcement agency - e.g., Anytown
Police Department. This must be consistent with the DAG-71. Check the appropriate box to indicate type of agency.
Acronyms should be spelled out. If a task force, provide a list of member agencies, addresses, and lead agency, if designated.
New Participant: Check this box if your agency has never received any cash, proceeds, or property from the equitable
sharing program.
Contact Person: Enter the name of the person who can provide additional infonnation on the sharing agreement form.
E-mail Address: Enter the e-mail address of the contact person or the e-mail address of the agency.
Mailing Address: Enter your agency's complete mailing address (number, street, city, state, and zip code).
Telephone Number: Enter the phone number of the contact person, including area code and extension.
Fax Number: Enter your agency's fax number including area code.
Agency Fiscal Year Ends on: Enter the ending date (month/day) of your agency's fiscal year - e.g., 6/30.
NCIC/ORlfTracking No.: Enter your valid FBI-issued National Crime Information Center (NCIC)/ORI code - e.g.,
CAOOOOOOO - or tracking number assigned by the Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section.
Civil Rights Provision: Police departments, sheriffs' departments, prosecutors' offices, and other law enforcement
agencies that receiye federal financial assistance from the Department of Justice (DOl) are subject to the provisions of: (I)
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin; (2) Title
IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in training and educational
programs; (3) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability; and (4)
the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age. Federal financial assistance includes
funds, training and technical assistance, logistical support, and property transfers from DOl including equitable sharing.
Agencies receiving assistance are required to permit DOl investigators access to records and any other sources of infonnation
as may be necessary to determine compliance with civil rights laws. If tbe "yes" box is cbecked in 8a aiHilor 8b, provide
tbe following information: the name of the case; a summary of tbe complaint; and tbe status of the case - e.g., Jones
v. Anytown Police Department; sex discrimination; settled. Please do not send a copy of the complaint.
Law Enforcement Agency Head: The head of your law enforcement agency must sign and date the fonn. Name and
title of the signatory must be printed or typed. Examples of law enforcement agency heads include police chief, sheriff,
director, commissioner, superintendent, administrator, chairperson, secretary, city attorney, county attorney, district attorney,
prosecuting attorney, state attorney, commonwealth attorney, and attorney general. For task forces, the law enforcement
agency head is the person who oversees task force operations and may be the chieflaw enforcement officer of the lead agency
- e.g., police chief or sheriff - or a commander, lieutenant, or captain who oversees task force operations. By signing the
agreement, the signatory certifies that the 1Ieceiving state or local law enforcement agency is in compliance with the Justice
and Treasury Guides, and agrees to be bound by the statutes and guidelines whiçh regulate the equitable sharing program.
Governing Body Head: The head of your governing body must sign and date the form. Name and title of the signatory
must be printed or typed. For purposes of this Conn, a governing body is the person or entity that has appropriations authority
over your agency. That is, the governing body has legislative authority to approve your agency's annual budget. Examples
of governing body heads include city manager, mayor, city council chairperson, county executive, county council chairperson,
director, secretary, administrator, commissioner, and governor. In general, a law enforcement official sbould not sign as
tbe governing body bead. An exception will be granted for law enforcement officials that have appropriations authority over
a task force. For task forces with a governing board, the board chairperson should sign as the governing body head. Task
forces whose budgets are approved in the same manner as a city, county, or state law enforcement agency should obtain the
signature of the appropriate official - e.g., city manager, mayor, etc. By signing the agreement, the signatory certifies that
the receiving state or local law enforcement agency is in compliance with the Justice and Treasury Guides, ~
bound by the statutes and guidelines which regulate the equitable sharing program. --
Federal Annual Certification Report
ThIs report IftJSt be IIIIbmiII8d within eo days after the dOH of y(IUf fiscal year to the;
Asset FCIlfeItIn end Money laundering SectIon
U.S. DepaItmet't of Justiœ
10th and ConstIIuIIon Avenue. NW
Bond BuIlding. 10" Floor
Washington, DC 2OMO
Fax; (202)616-1344
E..naØ address; afmIs.acaCusdoI.DOY
Exec:tillve Office lor AAeI Forf8iIuf8
U.S. Oepartmsnl of the Treasury
740 15th &reet. NW
SuIte 700
WashIngIðn. DC 20220
Fax: (202) 1!I22-11610
E-ft18iI add","; lreas.acatllteo;ri'.ln;Ias.DOY
Law Enforcement Agency:
0 Police Department 0 Sheriff's OfficelDcpartmcnt
Contact Person:
0 Other
0 Task Force (- lilt or........)
E-mail Address:
0 Prosecutor's Office
(State)
(Zip Code)
Mailing Address: (Street)
(City)
Telephone Numbef": L->
Agency Fiscal Year Ends on: '(Month!DayNcar)
Fax Number: L-J
NCIClORlITracklng No.:
Summary of Equitable Sharing Activity
(Fiscal Year Ending )
I.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Justice Funds
(DEA, FBI, etc)'
S
S
S
S
S
S
Sf
S
$
Beginning Equitable Sharing Fund Balance (must match Ending Equitable Sharing Fund Balance from prior FY) . .
Federal Sharing Funds Received from the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury. . . . . . . . .
Federal Sharing Funds Received from Other Law Enforcement Agencies and Task Forces (complete attaclunent)
Otherlncorne """""""""""""""""""""""""""...,...................
Interest Income Accrued (0 check ifnon-interest-bearing account) """"""""""""""""'"
Total Equitable Sharing Funds (total of lines 1-5) """"""""""""""""""""""""
FederaISharingFundsSpent(totaloflinesa-n) """"""'" """" """""" """"" "'"
Ending Equitable Sharing Fund Balance (subtract line 7 from line 6) """""""""""""""""
Appraised Value of Other Assets Received """""""""""""""""""""""""""
. Summary of Shared Monies Spent
a. Total spent on salaries'ror new, temporary, not to exceed I-year employees. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $
b. Totalspentonovertime....................................."""""""""""""""'" $
c. TotalspentoninformantandMbuymoney" """"""""""""""""""""""""""" S
d. Total spent on travel and training """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""" $
e. Totalspentoncomrnunicationsandcomputers """"""""""""""""""""""""'" S
f. TotaJspentonfirearmsartdweapons """"""""""""""""""""""""""""'.. S
g. Totalspentonbodyannorandproteçtivegear............................"""""""""""" S
h. Total spent on electronic swveillartce equipment """"""""""""""""""""""""" S
I. Totalspentonbuildingandimprovements........................""""""""""""""'" S
J. Total spent on drug cducation and awareness programs """""""""""""""""""""'" $
k. Total spent on other law enforcement expenses (complete attachment) """""'" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . .. S
I. Total transfers to other state and local law enforcement agencies (complete attachment) ",,""""""'.. S
m. Total permissible use transfers (complete attachment) """"""""""""""""""""""" S
Amount of line (m) used for drug abuse treatment
and prevention programs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $
n. Totalspentonmatchinggrants(completeattachment)...................""""""""""""'" $
o. Youragency'sbudgetforcUITentfiscalyear ........................................$
Your jurisdiction's budget for cum:nt fiscal year """""""""""""""""'" $
Your agency's budget for prior fiscal year """"""""""""""""""""" S
Yourjurisdiction'sbudgetforpriorfiscalyear....................""""""""'" S
p.
q.
r.
Treasury Funds
(IRS, ICE, etc)
S
S
$
$
$
$
$(
S
$
$
$
S
$
$
S
$
S
S
S
S
S
$
Under the penalty of peljury, the undersigned hereby cernfy that the information in this report is an aecurate accounting of funds received and spent by the law
enforcement agency under the federal equitable sharing program during this reporting period.
Name (Print or Type)
Law Enforcement Agency Head
Date
Name (Print or Type)
Governing Body Head
Signature;
Signature:
Date
Title:
Title;
This fonn is subjeet to 1M Freedom oflnfonrmòon Act and may be released under 5 U.5.c. § 552. See www.usdoi.lWv/criminaL'afinls.html or www.lreas.Rovlofficeslenfon:ementiteoaffor additional forms.
. Include: under J...rice I\md¡ shared cash. proceeds. ond propeny recci~ from the Drug Enforeemenl Administration (DEA). Federal Bureau of In>atÎplion (FBI). U.S. Attorney's OffICe. U.S. Postallnspeelion Service.
Food BOd Drug Administration. and U.S. Deparunonl"f Agriaahure.
. Include under Treasury funds shmd cash. pmccccIs. and property recei>ed Iiom !be Bureau of Alcohol. T oba<:co. Fireanns and &plosi.a (A Tf)'. In..mal Revenue Service ORS). U.S.
Irmtignorion ond CoSIOInS EnfolCCmclll (ICE). U.s.Custocns ond Border l'roIcdion. u.s. SecreI ScMcc, and U.S. Coasl Guard.
'The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco. Fircanns and Explosives is I component oflbe Dcpanmca, of Jusrice. but ATF's equitable shoring is currcnlly Proc:eaoed by \he Dq>artmcnI of
Ibe Treasury. Until funh... notice. plcuc deposit III equitably sh--' euh ond proceeds &om A Tf ÎÐ your IfPCy's Treasury fund.
April 2005
Federal Annual Certification Report Attachment
3. Federal Sharing Funds Received from Other Law Enforcement Agencies and Task Forces
Amount Received
Name of Law Enforcement Agency Agency Address Justice Funds Treasury Funds
$ $
$ $
$ $
If additional space is needed, please attach additional page. Attachment 0 Yes 0 No
k. Total Spent on Other Law Enforcement Expenses
Amount Spent
Item Purchased Justice Fnnds Treasury Funds
$ $
$ $
$ $
Ifadditional space is needed, please attach additional page. Attachment 0 Yes 0 No
I. Total Transfers.to Other State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies
Amount TransfeITed
Name of Law Enforcement Agency Agency Address Justice Funds Treasury Funds
$ $
$ $
$ $
If additional space is needed, please attach additional page. Attachment 0 Yes 0 No
m. Total Permissible Use Transfers
. Amount Spent
Name of Recipient Agency Justice Funds
$
$
$
Ifadditional space. is needed, please attach additional page. Attachment 0 Yes 0 No
n. Total Spent on Matching Grants
Amount Spent
Name of Grant Justice Funds Treasury Funds
$ $
$ $
$ $
Ifadditional space is needed, please attach additional page. Attachment 0 Yes 0 No
April 2005
Federal Annual Certification Report Instructions
Law Enforcement Agency: Enter the complete name of your state or local law enforcement agency - e.g., Anyiown
Police Department. This must be consistent with the DAG- 71. Check the appropriate box to indicate type of agency.
Acronyms should be spelled out. If a task force, provide a list of member agencies, addresses, and lead agency, if
designated.
Contact Person: Enter the name of the person who can provide additional infonnation on the certification report.
E-mail Address: Enter the e-mail address of the contact person or the e-mail address of the agency.
Mailing Address: JWter your agency's complete mailing address (number, street, city, state, and zip code).
Telephone Number: Enter the phone number of the contact person, including area code and extension, if any.
Fax Number: Enter your agency's fax number, including area code.
Agency Fiscal Year Ends on: Enter the ending date (month/day/year) of your agency's fiscal year ~ e.g., 6/30/05.
NCIC/ORlffracking No.: Enter your valid FBI-issued National CrimeInfonnation Center (NCIC)/ORJ code - e.g.,
CAOOOOOOO - or tracking number assigned by the Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section.
Beginning Equitable Sharing Fund Balance: Enter on line 1 the amount in your federal forfeiture fund account at
the beginning of your fiscal year. The amount entered on line 1 must match the Ending Equitable Sharing Fund Balance
reported on your agency's Federal Annual Certification Report for the prior fiscal year. If the Beginning Equitable Sharing
Fund Balance differs from the Ending Equitable Sharing Fund Balance reported last year, an amended Federal Annual
Certification Repòrt must be submitted. Separate Justice funds from Treasury fuods. Include under Justice funds
shared cash and/or proceeds received from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Federal Bureau ofInvestigation
(FBI), U.s. Attorney's Office, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, Food and Drug Administration, and U.S. Department of
Agriculture. Include under Treasury funds shared cash and/or proceeds received from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Fireanns and Explosives (A TF), Internal Revenue Service (IRS), V .S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), V.S.
Customs and Border Protection, V.S. Secret Service, and U.S. Coast Guard. Please note that A TF is a component of the
Department of Justice, but A TF's equitable sharing is currently processed by the Department of the Treasury. Until further
notice, please deposit all equitably shared cash and proceeds from A TF in your agency's Treasury fund.
Federal Sharing Funds Received from the Departments of Justice and Treasury: Enter on line 2 the total
amount of shared cash and/or proceeds received from the federal equitable sharing program. For example, if your fiscal
year ends 6/30/05, include all sharing funds received from 7/1/04 through 6/30/05. Separate Justice funds from Treasury
funds: Funds from state and local forfeitures should not be reported on the Federal Annual Certification Report.
Federal Sharing Funds Received from Other Law Enforcement Agencies and Task Forces: Enter on line
3 the total amount of federal sharing funds received from other state and local law enforcement agencies and task forces.
Please provide a list of the agencies your agency received funds from, their address, and the amount received on the Federal
Annual Certification Report Attachment.
Other Income: Enter on line 4 the proceeds from the sale of shared property or any amounts returned to your forfeiture
fund account - e.g., funds from the sale of a car placed in official use or reimbursements received from your city, county,
or state for expenditures made with shared funds.
Interest Income Accrued: Enter on line 5 the interest earned on your federal forfeiture fund account during your fiscal
year. Account for Justice and Treasury interest income separately. Check box ifshared funds are in a non-interest-bearing
account.
Total Equitable Sharing Funds: Add the beginning equitable sharing fund balance (line 1), the federal sharing funds
received from the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury (line 2), federal sharing funds received from
state and local law enforcement agencies and task forces (line 3), other income (line 4), and interest income (line 5). Enter
on line 6 the total amount.
Federal Sharing Funds Spent: Add items a through n. Enter the total amount on line 7.
April 2005
Ending Equitable Sharing Fund Balance: Subtract the federal sharing funds spent (line 7) from the total equitable
sharing funds (line 6). Enter on line 8 the ending balance.
Appraised Value of Other Assets Received: Enter on line 9 the fair market value of any federally forfeited property
received - e.g., if the fair market value of a car is $10,000, then enter $10,000 on line 9. Note: When the car is sold,
proceeds from the sale must be deposited in your federal equitable sharing account and recorded as other income (line 4)
in the year sold.
Summary of Shared Monies Spent: Enter on lines a-n the total amount spent for each item listed.
Total Spent on Drug Education and Awareness Programs: Enter on line j the total amount your agency spent
conducting drug education and awareness programs.
Total Spent on Other Law Enforcement Expenses: Enteron line k the total amount of expenses not listed in items
a through j. Please provide a list of items purchased and the amount spent on the Federal Annual Certification Report
Attachment.
Total Transfers to Other State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies: Enter on line I the amount transferred
to other state and local law enforcement agencies. Please provide a list of recipients, their address, and the amount
transferred on the Federal Annual Certification Report Attachment. Before transferring funds, your agency must verify
that the receiving agency has a current and valid Federal Equitable Sharing Agfeement on file with both the Department
of Justice and the Department of the Treasury.
Total Permissible Use Transfers: The Department of Justice pennits state and local law enforcement agencies to use
up to 15 percent of shared funds received during the last two fiscal years to support drug abuse treatment, drug and crime
prevention education, housing and job skills programs, or other nonprofit community-based programs or activities, which
are formally apprQved by the chieflaw enforcement officer - e.g., chief, sheriff, or prosecutor - as being supportive of and
consistent with a law enforcement effort, policy, and/or initiative. Law enforcement agencies may not transfer cash
to non-law enforcement agencies or private nonprofit organizations. Law enforcement agencies may either 1) directly
pay specific expenses on behalf of the recipient agency/organization or 2) reimburse the agency/organization by check for
itemized expenditures. Enter on line m the total amount spent on behalf of non-law enforcement agencies and private
nonprofit organizations. Please provide a list of recipients and the amount spent on the Federal Annual Certification Report
Attachment.
Amount Used for Drug Abuse and Prevention Programs: From line m, enter the total amount used for drug abuse
treatrnent and prevention programs.
Total Spent on Matr. .'iing Grants: Enter on line n the amount of federal equitable sharing funds your agency spent
to match grants. Please provide the name of grants matched and the amount spent to match each grant on the Federal
Annual Certification Report Attachment.
Your Agency's Budget for Current Fiscal Year: On line 0, enter your agency's budget for the current fiscal year.
If completing the certification for FY 2005, enter your agency's budget for FY 2006.
Your Jurisdiction's Budget for Current Fiscal Year: Enter on line p your city/county/state's budget for the current
fiscal year. If completing the certification for FY 2005, enter your jurisdiction's budget for FY 2006.
Your Agency's Budget for Prior Fiscal Year: On line q, enter your agency's budget for the prior fiscal year. If
completing the certification for FY 2005, enter your agency's budget for FY 2005.
Your Jurisdiction's Budget for Prior Fiscal Year: Enter on line r your city/county/state's budget for the prior fiscal
year. If completing the certification for FY 2005, enter your jurisdiction's budget for FY 2005.
Law Enforcement Agency Head: The head of your law enforcement agency must sign and date the form. Name and
title of the signatory must be printed or typed. Examples of law enforcement agency heads include police chief, sheriff.
director, commissioner, superintendent, administrator, chairperson, secretary, city attorney, county attorney. district
attorney, prosecuting attorney, state attorney, commonwealth attorney, and attorney general. For task forces, the law
enforcement agency head is the person who oversees task force operations and may be the chief law enforcement officer
of the lead agency - e.g., police chief or sheriff - or a commander, lieutenant, or captain who oversees task force
Apríl 2005
operations. By signing the Federal Annual Certification Report, the signatory certifies that this report is an accurate
accounting of federal equitable sharing funds received and spent by the law enforcement agency during the reporting
period.
Governing Body Head: The head of your governing body must sign and date the fonn. Name and title of the signatory
must be printed or typed. For purposes of this fonn, a governing body is the person or entity that has appropriations
authority over your agency. That is, the governing body has legislative authority to approve your agency's annual budget.
Examples of governing body heads include city manager, mayor, city council chairperson, county executive, county council
chairperson, director, secretary, administrator, commissioner, and governor. In general, a law enforcement official
sbouldnot sign as tbe governing body bead. An exception will be granted for law enforcement officials that have
appropriations authOfÌ.ty over a task force. For task forces with a governing board, the board chairperson should sign as
the governing body head. Task forces whose budgets are approved in the same manner as a city, county, or state law
enforcement agency should obtain the signature of the appropriate official - e.g., city manager, mayor, etc. By signing
the Federal Annual Certification Report, the signatory certifies that this report is an accurate accounting offederaI equitable
sharing funds received and spent by the law enforcement agency during the reporting period.
Mail the Federal Annual Certification Report to the Departments of Justice and Treasury at:
Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture
U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of the Treasury
10th and Constitution Avenue, NW 740 15th Street, NW
Bond Building, 10111 Floor Suite 700
Washington, DC 20530 Washington, DC 20220
Fax: (202) 616-1344 Fax: (202) 622-9610
E-mail address: afmls.aca@usdoi.20v E-mail address: treas.aca@teoaf.treas.20v
The original Federal Annual Certification Report should be sent to the Department from which your agency primarily
receives shared funds. A copy should be sent to the other Department and to the U.S. Attorney in the district in which
your agency is located. Additional copies of this report can be downloaded from the Department of Justice website at
www.usdoi.~ov/crimina1/afmls.hnnl or the Department of the Treasury website at
www.treas.gov/officeslenforcementlteoaf.
April 2005
MEETING DATE:
May 171\ 2005
ITEM# Y (1)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
S336th Street at 1 st Ave South Intersection Improvements - 30% Design Status Report
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
[g CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
D ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to the Land Use and Transportation Committee dated May Zlld, ZO05.
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: This project will add a westbound right-turn lane and extend the westbound left-turn
lane on S 336th Street and extend the southbound lefHurn lane on 1st Way South. The traffic signal wil1 be modified to
accommodate the added lane. The purpose of the project is to improve traffic flow and reduce accidents by eliminating
conflicts.
The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. Currently, the project design is
approximately 30% complete, which includes the following completed tasks:
.
The Topographical Surveys
Right of Way Acquisition
SEP A Submittals
Project Design to 30%
.
.
.
Ongoing Tasks Include:
.
SEP A Approval and Project Pennitting
Project Design to 100%
.
This project is scheduled to go to bid in July 2005 and start construction Septembcr 2005 ,
"""'--.......-..-..........0_....'..
mm._m.m_m.m_m ..
"'0""'"""...."""..,..,....
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its May 2nd, 2005 meeting, the Land Use and
Transportation Committee forwarded the following staff recommendations:
1. Authorize staff to proceed with design of the S336th Street at 1 sl Ave South Intersection Improvements Project.
Bid the project and return to LUTC Committee with a request for pennission to award the project to the lowest
responsible, responsive bidder.
......._._._mmm._.."_".'..".."...O""
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to authorize staff to proceed with design of the 8336th Street at 1st Ave South
Intersection Improvements Project. Bid the project and return to LUTC Committee with a request for pennission to award
the project to the lowest responsible, responsive bidder."
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading -
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05tlOt2001
CITY OJ' FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
t(o)f1f
DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
--~.'--
May 2, 2005
Land Use and Transportation Committee
David H. Mose~anager ~
Marwan Salloum: ¥E.~ S~et Systems Manage' .
S336th Street at 1" Ave South Intersection lmprov ellts;
30% Design Status Report
POLICY QUESTION:
Should the Council authorize staff to proceed with the design of the S336th Street at I sl Ave Intersection
Improvements project and return to the Council at the 100% design completion for further reports and
authorization?
BACKGROUND:
This project will add a westbound right-turn lane and extend the westbound IefHurn lane on S 336th Street and
extend the southbound left-turn lane on 1st Way South. The traffic signal will be modified to accommodate the
added lane. The purpose of the project is to improve traffic flow and reduce accidents by eliminating conflicts.
The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. Currently, the project design is
approximately 30% complete, which includes the following completed tasks:
.
The Topographical Surveys
Right of Way Acquisition
SEP A Submittals
Project Design to 30%
.
.
.
Ongoing Tasks Include:
.
SEP A Approval and Project Permitting
Project Design to 100%
.
This project is scheduled to go to bid in July 2005 and start construction September 2005 .
PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES:
Planning and Design
Construction Cost (estimate)
15% Construction Contingency
Construction Management
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
$60,000
230,000
35,000
35,000
$360,000
AVAILABLE FUNDING:
._m_.._.__--""'-'-_U"'" . .m........- ...
General Fund
REEl' Fund
$160,000
234,000
8,744
$402,744
Mitigation
TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET
May 2, 2005
.",," L~~$~"anØ':'Tta1l9Óõ¡'tà\ion Committee
'c,)J;J3'ih);-tie~tat 1 S\ Ave h¡tersection Improvements- 30% Design Status Report
'P}lgc'2 - - - - .'
1..: - , -
OPTIONS:
1.
Authorize staff to proceed with design of the S336th Street at 151 A'lie South intersection
Improvements Project. Bid the project and return to LUTC Committee with a request for
pennission to award the project to the lowest responsible, responsive bidder.
Authorize staff to proceed with design of the S336th Street at 151 Ave South Intersection
Improvements Project. Return to LUTC Committee at the 100% design completion stage for
further reports and authorization.
Do not authorize staff to proceed with finalizing the design of this project and provide direction to
staff.
2.
3.
ST AFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends forwarding Option 1 to the May 17,2005 City Council Consent Agenda for approval:
Authorize staff to proceed with design of thc S336th Street at 1st Ave South Intersection Improvements
Project. Bid the project and return to LUTC Committee with a request for pennission to award the project to
the lowest responsible, responsive bidder.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Forward the above staffrecommendation to the May 17,2005 Cîty Council Consent Agenda.
cc:
_n__.._- ..____n______---.. - -
--- ---____--_n______-------------------------------
MEETING DATE:
May 17th, 2005
ITEM# -~ -(M)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
RFB 05-104, Lakota Creek East Branch Restoration Improvement -Bid Award
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMP ACT:
IZI CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$444,247.50
$
_...........-,--------------------,---_.,..,...................,-..-,-....-....----------------,-_.............,....................-..----,----
"'.........."""......__mmm_m~__.m" .""..",..................................................._.."",m__m______mm_._._--______m_____._'m_m"" .."..."......"......................,...............-"....__.m__..mm_m_"m__mm-
ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to the Land Use and Transportation Committee dated May rd, 2005.
..m._____mmmm__""""......................"""".._..___mm.mm___--_.""""......................-...."mm
mm____-----_--_--"_m"",......"""....................................".......".."m__"..
m--",,_.m_mm_m"_m..__.m--
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Council gave authorization to bid this project on March 1,2005. Six bids were received
and opened on April 11, 2005; please see attached Bid Tabulation Summary. The apparent low bidder is Kemper
Construction Corporation with a total bid of $444,247.50. This is $80,683 lower than the engineer's estimate.
Due to uncertainty of pipe availability, the bid package provided for two different bid schedules for pipe based on
different pipe wall thicknesses. Kemper Construction Corporation was low bidder on both alternatives. The alternative
thinner pipe thickness would only be selected if the prefeITed, thicker walled pipe were unavailable at time of ordering.
Reference checks on Kemper Construction Corporation by staff indicates that the contractor has perfom1cd similar work.
As a result, staff believes Kemper Construction Corporation can successfully complete this project to the city's
satisfaction. Therefore, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Kemper Construction Corporation in the amount of
$444,247.50
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its May 2nd, 2005 meeting, the Land Use and
Transportation Committee forwarded the following staff recommendations:
1. Award Lakota Creek East Branch Restoration Improvement project to Kemper Construction
Corporation, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $444,247.50, and approve a
10% contingency of $44,424.75, for a total of $488,672.25, and authorize the City Manager to execute
the contract.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to award Lakota Creek East Branch Restoration Improvement project to
Kemper Construction Corporation, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $444,247.50,
and approve a 10% contingency of $44,424.75, for a total of $488,672.25, and authorize the City Manager to
execute the contract."
~;~~-~~------
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
"-,-,,-,....--,--..,,,---,------______m________m______--------------
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - OStlO12001
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
(CCO\f>1f
DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
May 2, 2005
Land Use and Transpo
David H. M l anager
Paul A. Bucich, .E., Surface Water Manage~
RFB 05-104, Lakota Creek East Branch Restoration Improvement -Bid Award
POLICY QUESTION:
Should the Councìl award the Lakota Creek East Branch Restoration Improvement project to the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder?
BACKGROUND:
Council gave authorization to bid this project on March 1,2005. Six bids were received and opened on April 11,
2005; please see attached Bid Tabulation Summary. The apparent low bidder is Ken1per Construction
Corporation with a total bid of$444,247.50. This is $80,683 lower than the engineer's estimate.
Due to uncertainty of pipe availability, the bid package provided for two different bid schedules for pipe based on
different pipe wall thicknesses. Kemper Construction Corporation was low bidder on both alternatives. The
alternative thinner pipe thickness would only be selected if the preferred, thicker walled pipe wcre unavailable at
time of ordering. '
Reference checks on Kemper Construction Corporation by staff indicates that the contractor has perfonned
similar work. As a result, staff believes Kemper Construction Corporation can successfully complete this project
to the city's satisfaction. Therefore, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Kemper Construction
Corporation in the amount of $444,247.50
PROJECT COSTS AND CONTINGENCY:
ESTIMATED PROJECT EXPENDITURES:
Preliminary Design
Final Design
Year 2005 Construction
10% Construction Contingency
Construction Management (estimate, 15% of construction
cost)
Post Construction Monitoring (estimate, 2.5% of
eonstTuction cost)
TOT AI, PROJECT COSTS
$ 162,518.00
$ 57,844.00
$ 444,247.50
44,424.75
$66,637.00
$1l,1O6.00
$786,777.25
A VAILA8LE PROJECT FUNDING:
$1,480,597.00
PROJECT SAVINGS:
--.- - -,
Current project estimates indicate a savings of up to $693,820 contingent upon final costs of
construction, construction management, and post construction monitoring.
OPTIONS:
1. Award Lakota Creek East Branch Restoration Improvement project to Kemper Construction
Corporation, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $444,247.50, and approve a 10%
contingency of $44,424.75, for a total of $488,672.25, and authorize the City Manager to execute the
contract.
2. Reject all bids for the Lakota Creek East Branch Restoration Improvement project and direct staff to
rebid the project and return to Committee for further action.
3. Do not award the Lakota Creek East Branch Restoration Improvement project to the lowest
responsive, responsible bidderand provide direction to staff.
Staff Recommendation:
Authorize forwarding Option 1 to the May 17,2005 City Council Consent Agenda for Approval:
Award Lakota Creek East Branch Restoration Improvement project to Kemper Construction Corporation,
the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $444,247.50, and approve a 10% contingency
of $44,424.75, for a total of $488,672.25, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.
Committee Recommendation:
Forward option 1 to the May 17,2005 City Council Consent Agenda.
k:-_1I1k\¡!!t( memo [emplale - new.j¡-,,"
'-','" '-',u 'auu'a"v'<~ '-~"r"d'~U r,vu<",r~ UV~,
'-""vrr,-,",,-,""-"'"
Capital Improvement Project
FB#: 05-1 04 Project TWe: Lakota Creek East Branch Restoration Project
.pared br: Fei Tang Date: 4.'11.'05
Contractor Name:
I
m¡Description
Surveying --
HTMlpOrary Water Pollution/Erosioo Control
, UUlities Locale and Protection
DiYersion aM Care ot Wate,
qForœ Account
; Mobil.zotlon {6.0',.', \
Te~Ofary Traffic Control
Clearing and Grubb<ng
Remov," of Strudures and Obstrvcticns
) Excavation, including Haul, Stockpile, Placement
1 Foundation Material
, GraveUCobble Mix
J CobblellJoulde, Mix
I 24" 80ulder,;
; Shoring or Extra Excavation Class B
¡ Geolext;le
7 Ballast
¡ Crushed Surfacing
¡ Asphan Concrete Pavemen1, Class B
) SDR 26 fjDPE S1om> Sewer Pipe, ,4" Diam.
A SDR 32.5 HOPE Storm Sewer Pipe, 24" Diam.
I HOPE Pipe Elbow
! Plain Cone. Slo"" Sewer Pipe, 12" Diam.
¡ Calch 8asin Type 1
I Manhole 60' Diam. Type 3
¡ Calen 8asin Type 284" Diam
¡ 80x Cu1vert
, Safely Rack
¡ Topsoil Type A
¡ Erosion Control Malting
) Compost
I Invas""" Species Cootrol Type A
> Invasive Species Cont,ol Type 8
¡ PSIPE Douglas Fir {staked)
I PSIPE Bi9 Leaf Maple (staked)
¡ PSIPE Red Alder {s:aked]
¡ PSIPE Western RE>d Cedar (staked!
, PSIPE Western liemlock (staked)
Un"
LS
LS
LS
LS
FA
!:§.
LS
AC
LS
LS
TN
TN
TN
EA
SF
SY
TN
TN
TN
IF
IT
ï:š
IT
ËA
ËA
ËA
IF
EA
Kemper Construction
Engineer's Estimate Corporation Jansen Inc. Anderson
- ~~ ~~~ ~~~d
Qty, Unit Price low Bìdde, Bid Bid
1 S 13.056.00 $ 13,058.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 14,000.00 S 38, tOO.OO $ 36.100.00 $ 7.632.89 $ 7,632.89
1 S 29.376.00 $ 29,378.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 S 3,560.00 $ 3.560.00 $ 12.722.27 $ 12.722.27
..2r-!-' ."^::1 $ 5,44Ð.00 $ 3.000,00 $ 3,000.00 S 3,32\.00 $ 3,321.00 S 1.220.49 $ 1.220.49
..2~ I .~' . J $ 11,750.40 $ 20.000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 6,583.00 $ ñ,583.oo S 22,850,40 $ 22.850,40
....:~ ..n. . I $ 10.880.00 $ 10.000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ to,OOO,oo S 10,000.00 $ 10.000.00
1 ~ 'f, I $ 29.376.00 $ 40.00000 $ 40,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 S 44,539.07 S 44.539.07
1 r-!- .' '..". S 9.879.04 $ 15,000.00 $ 15.000.00 $ 4.751.00 $ ~.751.00 $ 11,530.84 $ 11 ,530.84
0.3 ~ :: 'I S 7.833.60 $ 12.000.00 $ 3.600.00 $ 9.000.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 86,484.03 $ 25.945.2 t
1 r-!-... I S 6.976.43 $ 3,000.00 $ 3.000.00 $ 15.556.00 $ 15,558.00 $ 1O,Ot6.69 $ 10,016.69
1 r-!- I.; ..) S 6.147.20 $ 20,000.00 S 20.000.00 $ 8.2t 1.00 $ 8,211.00 $ 31,413.96 $ 31,413.96
15 $ ...', S 734.40 $ 15.00 S 225.00 $ 307.86 $ 4.617.90 $ t6.90 $ 253.50
- ---
30 $ .,..., $ 1,958.40 $ 30.00 S """.00 $ 314.80 S -..'.::-,', $ 27.25 $ 8t7.50
- --- ...
175 $ ..', $ 28.560.00 $ 9000 S ..' .'DO $ 68.32. S; $ 35.90 $ 13,462.50
- --- .
160 $ ., $ 13,926.40 S 200.00 S ...' ...00 S 26.25 S '., $ 38.38 $ " ,~n An
-r--' .
3.200 $ . -' $ 24,371.20 $ \.25 S " ..00 S 1.16 S ' ¡ ..' $ 6.33 $
- --- . . .
40 $ , " $ 174.08 $ 20.00 $ '.00 S 58.15 S ' , ... S 2.02 $
--,-- -
~r!- ,.1 $ 9,t39.20 $ 36.00 $ :..00 $ 45.03 $ "~;':' S 15.48 $
180 ~ ' ,. $ 6,854.40 S 36.00 $ .. ..00 S 54.50 $ ...1.' S 16.90 S
5$ ".'." $ 816,00 $ 330.00 $ ..00 $ 573.75 $ ,~. $ 635.25 $
- . n.-
~ ~ '. ; $ 81,643.52 S 106.00 $ .00 $ 72.88 $ :'. " '. $ 1O9.69 $
536 $ .: ... $ 78, t44.51 $ 100.00 $ .00 $ 65.14 $ :,.:' ': $ 10329 $
-. .
1 $ ',.., $ 8,160.00 $ 7.800.00 $ . '.00 $ t ,314.32 $ . ",'. $ 1 ,525.00 $
-' . ..
28 S '.',' $ 1,462.27 $ 130.00 $ '.00 $ 129.00 $ " $ 282 25 $
-,-- ..
1 $ . ".'., $ 3,808.00 $ \.000.00 $ - '.00 $ 3.657.92 $ . . ~ $ 3.024.80 $
r- ..
2r-!--:' ~ .' >, $ 19,584.00 $ 3.900.00 $ . '.00 $ 5.M' "." r!---" " $ 4,488.60 $
1r-£2 .' .>, $ 15,232.00 $ 6.000.00 $ . '00 $ 7..1~:: r!--- ~..~ " $ 7.092.64 $
t2r!- ..:::' $ 3,264.00 $ 320.00 S j.tl40.0J $ '. '. r!--- ,: " $ 792.70 $
1r-!- ., $ 3,808.00 $ 2.300.00 S 2.30000 $ '.'.' r!--- "., $ t,192.53 $
SO S 5440 $ 2.120.00 $ 100.00 S 5.00000 $ " ~. ..'.J $ 53.23 $
no S 3.25 $ 2,513.28 $ moo S 7.700.c,J $ . $ .. .:', $ 1.6 f S
- .
t t5 S 55.28 $ 7,507.20 $ 50.00 S 5.750.00 $ r!--- ..,,~ $ 54.47 S
1,095 S 3.26 $ 3.574.08 $ 2.00 S 2.190.00 $ $ ;.,~".<C $ 0.87 S
2,~~5 S 3.26 $ 8,143.68 $ 250 S 8.237.50 $ .'!. $ 10.454.05 $ 0.87 $
2t $ 81.60 $ 1.713.60 $ 5500 $ t,t55.00 $ ::.: S 525.83 S 21.36 $
7$ 8160$ 571.20$ 5500$ 385.00$ '~,.$ t21.94S 21.36$
21 S 81.60 $ 1,713.60 $ 55.00 $ l,t55.00 S ,~.. S 365.82 S 21.36 $
50 S 81.60 $ 4.080.00 $ 6000 $ 3,00000 S S 1,504.00 $ 2136 $
38 S B1.60 $ 2.937.60 $ 60.00 $ 2,160.00 S ".' S 1,082.88 $ 2136 $
CY
SY
CY
SY
SY
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
K:\SWMl,pmjects\Active Projects\(project Name)\RFBG5.1 04 B¡dTabs (4-11.v5 Bid)
Page 112
.
A.1 Landscaping and ~
Construction Pacinc Earth Work . Americon .
Unit Price 4t nit ~ 5th Un't Price
~ ~ ~.~
$ 22.500.00 $ 22,500.00 $ 13,274.00 $ 13.274.00 S 10.000.00 S 10,000.00
$ 9,500.00 S 9,500.00 $ 25,867.00 S 25,867.00 S 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
S 5,000.00 $ 5.000.00 S 6,310.00 $ 6,310.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6.000.00
$ 15,000.00 $ '5.000.00 $ 23.654.00 S ¡'" .'.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5.000.00
$ 10.000.00 $ 10.000.00 $ 10.000.00 S :.. --1.00 $ tG,Ooo.OO $ 10,000.00
$ 60..000.00 $ 68.000.00 $ 80.675.00 $ '..' ~ ;.00 $ 57.000.00 $ 57.000.00,
$ 1i.000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 9.792.00 $ , ~.. ~.OO $ 20.000.00 $ 20.000.00 I
$ 9.800.00 $ 2,9<0.00 $ 127.840.00 $ :',. "~'OO S 20.000.00 $ 6,000.00
$ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 8,54 t.oo $ . .00 S 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00
$ 25.000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 9,248.00 S : 1.00 S 50,000.00 S 50,000.00
S 29.00 $ 435.00 $ 54.00 S ).00 $ 200.00 $ 3,000.00
S 35.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 76.00 S ' LOO $ 200.00 $ 6"000.00
S 75.00 $ 28.125.00 S 71.00 $ , i.OO $ 100.00 $ 37,.500.00
$ 110.00 $ 17,600.00 S 44.00 $ /,U4<).oo $ 100.00 $ t6,000.00
$ 8.00 $ 19,200.00 S 2.00 $ 6,400.00 $ 3.00 $ 9,600.00
$ 8.00 $ 320.00 $ 11.00 $ ,",0 $ 25.00 $ 1,000.00
$ 120.00 $ 28,BOOOO $ 49.00 $" 10 S 35.00 $ 8.400.00
$ 27.00 5 4,B60.üO $ 44.00 $ . 10 S 35.00 $ 6.300.00
$ 500.00 S 2,50000 $ 392.00 S :'.,]0 S 1,000.00 $ 5.000.00
$ 30.00 S t6,080.00 $ 2t2.00 $ 1'" )0 $ 175.00 $ 93,800.00
$ 25.00 $ 13,400.00 $ 205.00 S 1(. ... 10 $ 170.00 $ 91,t20.00
$ 2,000.00 $ 2.000.00 S 3.~4.00 $ '.)0 $ 5.000.00 $ 5,000.00
$ 65.00 $ \.820.00 S 109.00 $ ", '10 $ 50.00 $ 1,400.00
$ t,350.00 $ 1.350.00 $ t,414.oo $ , "0 $ t.600.00 S 1.600.00
$ 12,500.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 6,229.00 $ .., n 10 S 5,.500.00 $ It .000.00
$ 19,540.00 $ t9,54O.00 $ 9,738.00 S . ~ )Q 5 7,000.00 $ 7.000.00
$ 60.00 $ 720.00 $ 435.00 5 10 S 700.00 $ 8.400.00
$ 6,000.00 S 6,000.00 $ 2,356.00 S .' )0 S 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00
$ 33.00 S 1.650.00 $ 44.00 S .' )oJ $ ~5.00 $ 2,2SO.00
$ 4.00 $ 3,080.00 $ 2.00 S . )0 $ 5.00 $ 3,BSO.Q() i
$ 33.00 $ 1.795.00 $ 52.00 5 ,)0 $ 4500 $ 5, t75.00 ,
$ 16.00 $ 17.520.00 S 4.00 $ ""'.)0 $ 25.00 $ 27.375.00
S 14.00 $ 34.930.00 S 5.00 $ '2,475.00 $ 6.00 $ '4.970.00
$ 22.00 $ 452.00 $ 46.00 $ 966.00 $ 25.00 S 525.00
$ fB.oo $ 126.00 $ 28.00 $ 196.00 $ 25.00 S 175.00
$ 15.00 $ 336.00 $ 2B.00 $ 588.00 $ 25.00 S 525.00
S 22.00 $ '.10000 $ 46.00 $ 2.300.00 S 25.00 S !,25000
S 26,00 $ 935.00 $ 46.00 $ \.656.00 $ 25.üG $ 900.00
Printed: 4t1812005
U"" DIU ,QUUtd"U"" <::;"""'",,, r,uu"ul" vU';'
"'" , VI' I-<':U"","""L "1"11
CapitallmpmV'l!ment Pmiect
8#: 05.104 Project nle: Lakota Creek East Branch Restoration Proiect
pared t>y: Fel Tone Oate: 4I111!15
Contra~torName;
nlOesc:.ription
i PSIPE S~ka Spruœ (staked)
1 PSIPE Bi!terChP..rry (~dl
I PSIPE a""ked lia<elnuC
I PSIPEVioeMapie
! ~1f>'E S11nk currant
! PSIPE Sit.. Mounl.in Ash
\ PSIf>Elndiiln~m
¡ PSIPE PacifiC Crabapple
¡ PSIPE Thimblebeny
, PSIPE Sõìna1berry
I PSIPE Oœ<In Spr"'!
, PSIPE Red Elderberry
) PSIPE SI'OWOe/Ty
1 PSIPE laCy fem
1 PSIPE Sw[) '( Fem
PSIPE S...1
. PSIPE Red-Qsíer Dogwood CL1It~gs
5 PStPE Scc..t.,...W;lIowCultlng,
, Cameo! eo""",te Role<! Curt>
1 Cement Conetete Sidewalk
!i. rland Placed R;prap
;I 3-tIa n Roc\(
3 4-Man Rock
1 5-Ma<> Roc\(
2 Streambank LO<}
3 0etIacI0r LO<}
4 Roolwad
Unit
Ell
Ell
Ell
Ell
EA
EA.
Ell.
Ell.
EA
EA
EÁ
EA
EA
EA
Ell
EA
EA
EA
IF
Sy
Ti'I
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
Jan$eR Inc.
Pia Uo1il Pnce 2n<l
Q~, ~
21 $ 81.50 $ t.713.6'J $ 52,00 S 1.()92.oo $ 3(1,00 $
6 ~ 8'.50 ~ <Iæ,6'.) $ n.oo $ . 450.00 ~ ~. M S
82 $ 16,32 $ 1.338.24 S 40.00 S 3,28G.00 S : S
168 $ 16-32 $ 2,741.76 ~ .. -ó $ ': -. .~ S : S
24 $ \~.32 S 39L6S $ . $ " $ $
12 S 1~.32 S 195.84 $ $' n.' $ S
2t2 $ '~.32 $ 3.949.44 $ $ '.. --'. .., $ - $
13$ 15.~2$ 2t2,tõ$ $ ..."$ $
~$ IS,32 $ 913,92.$ $ ',:...$ S
17'~ 16,32 $ ", S $ ,',:0: $ S
71$ 15.32$ .,'..$ $"'.:.1$ S
251 $ 15.32 S: . S '." $ $
152 $ 15.32 S 7. ,$ $ ., $ \
28' lD.88$ ".$ .$ .1$ S
451$ 10,88'",.$ '$ ,<1$ $
22$ 10,M$ .',:$ $ ..,'.,"1$ $
410 S 3.26 f ., $ $ 1.410.00 S "$
200 $ 3.26 $ '. 1 S $ 1000.00 $ S
75 S 25.11 S 1,951!40 S $ 3J)OO,00 $ $
42 S 87.04 $ 3.55563 S $ 2.100,00 S S
22 S 97,92 S 2.154.24. $ 1.540,00 $ ~ S
15 $ 326.411 $ 4.895.00 S 1 S t,500,00 $ 200,110 S
2 $ '544.00 S 1.088,00 $ ., S 800,00 S SOO,OO S
4 $ 751.60 S 3.ß4".(,¡} $ 1.:~_."'-' $ 1,200.00 $ 215.00 S
20 S 2.393.60 $ 4l,8nOO S 1.150.00 $ 23,000,00 $ 2.134,18 $
a $ 2,720.00 , 21,760.00 $ 1.150.00 S 9,200.00 S 1,774.53 S
13 S 1.632.00 $ 21,216.00 $ 800.00 $ 10,400.00 $ 1,715.90 S
Tolal
Altamala Total
S 524.93062
S 521,43\.52
S 444,247.50
S 441,031.50
1t'SWMl?roiec1W'.ctivo Proiec1s'tProject ,""mo)'-RfB05.1 04 BidT dbs [4.11-05 Bid]
Page 2 J 2
631.68 $
1l354 S
1.685.92 $
3,391.92 $
429.12 $
360.95 S
6.132,28 S
391.04 S
198,00 S
269.11 $
1,124,54 $
4,257.00 $
3.1100.00 S
448.00 ~
8,l1B,00 S
395.00 $
1,41(1,00 $
800,00 $
I,OST.50 $
4,032.00 $
11,223.00 $
3..000.00 S
1.000.00 S
1.100.00 $
t2.563.60 S
14,195.24 $
22,319.70 $
$ 454,596.36
S 450.447,12
UnJ.Il'-l\œ 5th
Bid
~ $ 448.55 $ 28.00 $ 588.00 $
~ ° $ 128,15 $ 22.00 $ \32.00 S
~- S 2,(130.32 S 19.00 $ 1,558.00 $
2 . S J ,..,'. S 20,00 5 3,350.00 $
S .1.' S 20.00 5 481),00 $
< ., S .' '; S 23.00 $ 216,00 $
$ 2 ' $ 13.00 $ 3,145,00 $
¡ o. $ , -! S 18,00 $ 234.00 $
S ","'$ 13.00$ 728.00$
S " .' S !3.oo $ 221.00 $
$ ., 'I S 14.00 S 994.00' $
S ¡.: '.1 S 12.00 S 3,Clt2.00 S
$ , 0, S 13.00 $ 1.976,00 S
$ , . ,. I $ 12.00 $ 336.00 $
$ . . .1 $ 11.00 $ 4,96\.00 $
5 .' I S 11.00 S 242,00 S
$ .) $ 3,00 S 1.'10.00 S
$ '.) I 3.00 S 600.00 $
'$ 7IIT.50 5 13,00 S 975.00 $
$ 3,982.44 $ 59.00 $ 2,4M.00 $
; $ 3ð!.25 S 135.00 S 2,970.00 $
" " S 454.25 $ 380.00 S s.roO.OO S
I S 154,16 $ 5SO,00 S \.100,00 S
~- I $ 5&3.72 S 85QOO S 3.~00,OO $
3,1Ul,67 $ 52,157.40 $ 2,900.00 $ 58,000,00 $
4.070.48 $ 32,563.84 $ 3.100.00 $ 24,800,00 $
2.596.94 S 33,7IIQ.22 S 2.ãOO,00 $ 33,800.00 S
S 499,030.90
$ 495,500,50
$ 564,152.00
$ 562.072.00
-
"" IVI I S 966,00 $ 25.00 $ 525.00
$ 216,00' 25.00 $ 15Q.OO
$ 2.624,00 $ 25.00 $ 2,050,00
$. 4,.,,7\)4.00 $ '5,00 $ 2,520.00
$ .1 ..00 $ 10,00 $ 240.00
S . " ..00 S 25.11J S 300.00
"S ..: ,00 $ 10.00 5 2.420,00
$ '. ,.00 $. 25.00 S 325,00
$ ",,00 S 10.00 $ 560.00
$ '.00 $ 10.00 $ 170.00
$ --..()O $ 10,0(] $ 710.00
'S ,~,OO $ 10,00 S 2.5\0.00
., S ,.-..00 $ 10.()C' S 1.521).00
f S 1'.--.0(1 S 10.00 S 260.00
,$ , ". ..00 $ 10,00 $ 4.5\0.00
IS, ':,'00 S 10,00 $ 220,00
) S .' 0..00 $ 10,00 $ 4,100.00
5,00 $ .: 01.00 S 10.00 S 2,000.00
:15.00 $ ." ";00 S 5Q.00 S 3.750.00
7;/.00 $ 3,3t8.00 $ 00.00' 2.100.00
109.00 $ 2.398.00 S 50.00 $ \, loo.OCl
9&.00 $ 1,470-00. 100,00 $ 1.500.00
196.00 S 392,00 $ 200.00 $ 400.00
310.00 S 1,240.00 S 200,00 S 800.00
1,5<)7.00 S J }.!40.00 $ 2.000.00 S 40,000.00
1,507.00 $ '2.056,00 S 2,000.00 $ '6,000,00
838.00 $ 10,89400 S 2.000.00 $ 26,000.00
S 567.455.00
S 553,103.00
$ 578.85500
S 57&.115-00
Pr¡~1ed: 4118,12005
MEETING DATE:
May 17th, 2005
ITEM# JL (n )
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
Joe's Creek Habitat Restoration Project - 50% Design Status Report
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
[S CONSENT
D RESOLUTION
D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
D ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to the Land Use and Transportation Conlmittee dated May 211(1, 2005>
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: This project restores approximately 640 lineal feet of Joe's Creek located along the
southerly boundary of the Twin Lakes Golf and Country Club Driving Range. The existing channel is narrow and incised
with ongoing bank erosion that is threatening the stability of the stream bank and private property. Restoration activities
will include regrading the stream channel and banks, placement of fish habitat structures such as log obles and rootwads
within the stream channel, wetland mitigation planting and creation, and removal of 71 feet of broken storm drain pipe
lying in the channel. Up to 255 feet of 66-inch diameter pipe will replace an existing failing stonn line from the
pedestrian underpass to the creek.
Currently, the project design is approximately 50% complete, which includes the following completed tasks:
. The Topographical Survey and Mapping
. Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis
. Stream Geomorphology Assessment
. Fish Use, Passage, and Habitat Assessment
. Preliminary Wetland Analysis
. SEPA, Draft JARPA, and Draft Biologica] Evaluation
Ongoing tasks include:
. SEP A, JARP A and Biological Evaluation Determination and Project Permitting
. Easements Negotiations
. Project Design to 85% Level
...m._....._m_...._>....>.
"""""""""""""""'"
mm._m._._.._.....-"....'
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its May 2nd, 2005 meeting, the Land Use and
Transportation Committee forwarded the following staff recommendations:
1. Authorize Surface Water Management staffto proceed with design of the Joe's Creek Habitat Restoration Project
and return to the LUTC Committee at the 85% design completion stage for further reports and authorization.
Authorize Surface Water Management staff to negotiate easements with property owners along the stream
corridor of Joe's Creek then return to Council for authorization to execute the easements as outlined in City
policy.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to authorize Surface Water Management staff to proceed with design of the Joe's
Creek Habitat Restoration Project and return to the LUTC Committee at the 85% design completion stage for further
reports and authorization. Authorize Surface Water Management staff to negotiate easements with property owners along
the stream corridor of Joe's Creek then return to Council for authorization to execute the easements as outlined in City
policy."
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
,----"'.......-..................................
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
----------------..---" -------,..",,--..-------..--_____--n___---
REVISED - 05/l0t2001
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEM-ORANDUM
(Ç:(Ö)[PY
DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
SUB.JECT:
April 19, 2005
Land Use and Transportation Committee
David H. Mos~anager
Paul A. Bucich, P~,' Su;face Water Division Manage~
Joe's Creek Habitat Restoration Project - 50% Design Status Report
POLICY QUESTION:
Should Surface Water Management proceed with the design ofthe Joe's Creek Habitat Restoration Project to the
85% design level?
BACKGROUND:
This project restores approximately 640 lineal feet of Joe's Creek located along the southerly boundary of the
Twin Lakes Golf and Country Club Driving Range. The existing channel is narrow and incised with ongoing
bank erosion that is threatening the stability of the stream bank and private property. Restoration activities will
include regrading the stream channel and banks, placement of fish habitat structures such as log obles and
rootwads within the stream channel, wetland mitigation planting and creation, and removal of 71 feet of broken
stonn drain pipe lying in the channel. Up to 255 feet of 66-inch diameter pipe will replace an existing failing
stonnlíne from thc pedestrian underpass to the creek.
Currently, the project design is approximately 50% complete, which includes the following completed tasks:
. The Topographical Survey and Mapping
. Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis
. Stream Geomorphology Assessment
. Fish Use, Passage, and Habitat Assessment
. Preliminary W eHand Analysis
. SEP A, Draft JARP A, and Draft Biological Evaluation
Ongoing tasks include: ---
. SEP A, JARP A and Biological Evaluation Determination and Project Pennitting
. Easements Negotiations
. Project Design to 85% Level
PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES:
Design
Year 2006 Construction (Estimate)
10% Construction Contingency
10% Construction Management
Long Tenn Monitoring
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
$447,745
$1,092,623
$109,262
$109,262
$10,000
$1,768,892
AVAILABLE FUNDING:
TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET (EST.)
SURFACE WATER UTILITY
KING COUNTY FUNDiNG
$1,856,000
$750,000
$250,000
$856,000
OUTSIDE FUNDING
OPTIONS:
1. Authorize Surface Water Management staff to proceed with design of the Joe's Creek Habitat
Restoration Project and return to the LUTC Committee at the 85% design completion stage for further
reports and authorization. Authorize staff to negotiate necessary easements for the project and return
to Councìl for authorization as outlined in City policy.
2. Do not authorize staff to continue with the project and provide direction to staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDA nON:
Staff recommends forwarding Option I to the May 17th, 2005 Council Consent Agenda for approval:
Authorize Surface Water Management staff to proceed with design of the Joe's Creek Habitat Restoration Project
and return to the LUTC Committee at the 85% design completion stage for further reports and authorization.
Authorize Surface Water Management staff to negotiate easements with property owners along the stream
corridor of Joe's Creek then return to Council for authorization to execute the easements as outlined in City
policy.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDA nON:
Forward the above staff recommendation, Option 1, to the May 17tl., 2005 City Council Consent Agenda.
. "'..~--_.,
.'
-~~--
..
PB:mas
cc:
Project file
Central File
k;',Jute",luIC memo ter.¡plilte - new.doc
.:'~~:
," .:,~:
~:;;~:
."" .. ,,'
. .:.~
MEETING DATE:
May 171h, 2005
ITEM# ']Z: (D)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
AG05-037 SW356th Street Regional Retention Facility Fence Project - Project Acceptance
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
[g CONSENT
D RESOLUTION
D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
D ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
Amonnt Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$30,247.73
$
.......--........."...................... mm._m_.__....._...~...""
mm..................................-..___.__m.m
....................-......._mm.._.......
"""'................._....m
...............-'............................................
ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to the Land Use and Transportation Committee dated..May 2nd, 2005.
-,......................_...m.mm'_"__'_"'m"""'"
mm._m__mm..................................m....._.__m..__._m._""""""""""""'""""'-"mm....mm.
m...._..m.._m.__.._.._mm. m"..__.._..._..._"m.'" ..............................................-.......-..m.. mm._m'-mmm._._...m.
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Prior to release of retain age on a Public Works construction project, the City
Council must accept the work as complete to meet State Department of Revenue and State Department of Labor
and Industries requirements. The above referenced contract is complete. Upon City Council's acceptance of
the project, and meeting certain conditions by State law, the City will release and pay in full the amounts
retained during perfonnance of the contract.
PROJECT SAVINGS AND CONTINGENCY:
The final construction cost is $30,247.73 with sales tax. This amount is $155.34 below the authorized contract
total of $30,403.07, which includes $478.72 with sales tax for approved Change Order #1.
The final cost is $2,668.27 below the authorized construction budget of$32,916 approved by the City Council
on March 15,2005.
....m_._._..-.- ..-.-........... -'....... """"""'" ...........- ._mm..mm_.._mm.._"'_",""" ............ ....... ......m..mmm__- "-_m_mm.
mm._m.._._m_mm.._m_.__._.._m"..______.__m._.."mm.
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""",..........._m....
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its May 2nd, 2005 meeting, the Land Use and
Transportation Conunittee forwarded the following staff recommendations:
1. Authorize final acceptance of the completed SW356th Street Regional Retention Facility Fence Project
constructed by Sea West Construction, Inc., in the amount of $30,247.73, as complete.
mm._.- -'.._m..."""""""""'" .................m__._m._- -__..__mm"".."..-' "....... .............. .........m..__.._.._____m-'m."."""" """""""""""""'" .......,......m._m.__...._._m_.__mm"'_.".._mm. .-'..-'-.... -.... ....................... ........ ....... .............. ........ ...............................".... .-..... ..m........- -.. m...mm- .__mmm_m.._m.._m__mm.
2. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to Authorize final acceptance of the completed SW356th Street
Regional Retention Facility Fence Project constructed by SeaWest Construction, Inc., in the amount of
$30,247.73, as complete."
C~-~OVAL: --~---- --
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
m...._.._m.._mm_._..__..m..
COUNCIL ACTION:
D APPROVED
D DENIED
D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05tlOtZOOl
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
.._----, rtj) W
(G (Q) J2 'ìJ/
DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
May 2, 2005
Land Use and Transportation Committee
David H. Moseì~anager
Paul A. Bucich, P.E.~ Surface Water Division Manag~--
AG 05-037, SW356thStreet Regional Retention Facility Fence Project~
Proiect Acceptance
SUBJECT:
POLICY QUESTION:
Should the Council accept the SW356th Street Regional Retention Facility Fence Project constructed by
Sea West Construction. Inc. as complete?
BACKGROUND:
Prior to release of retainage on a Public Works construction project, the City Council must accept the
work as complete to meet State Department of Revenue and State Department of Labor and Industries
requirements. The above referenced contract is complete. Upon City Council's acceptance of the
project, and meeting certain conditions by State law, the City will release and pay in full the amounts
retained during performance of the contract.
PROJECT SAVINGS AND CONTINGENCY:
The final construction cost is $30,247.73 with sales tax. This amount is $155.34 below the authorized
contract total of $30,403.07, which includes $478.72 with sales tax for approved Change Order #1.
The final co~t is $2,668.27 below the authorized construction budget of $32,916 approved by the City
Council on March 15,2005.
OPTIONS:
L Authorize final acceptance of the completed SW356th Street Regional Retention Facility Fence
Project constructed by Sea West Constrnction. Inc., in the amount of$30,247.73, as complete.
2. Do not authorize final acceptance of the completed project and provide direction to staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends forwarding Option I to the May 17, 2005 City Council Consent Agenda for
Approval:
I. Authorize final acceptance of the completed SW356th Street Regional Retention Facility Fence
Project constructed by SeaWestConstrnction. lnc., in the amount of$30,247.73, as complete.
May 2, 2005
Land Use and Transportation Committee
AG 05~O37 Project Acceptance
Page 2 of 2
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDA nON:
Forward the above staff recommendation to the May 17, 2005 City Council Consent Agenda.
JW:dl
cc:
Project/Day File
K:$\VM;pr.'Ìcçt<\'>W35{;Tfl'-l'cncc ¡..,t:<lhtion",COu5tru.;(iùo'.Approvals (3"""'[ ,or" do,me)\LUTC-C","".'.iI\U,rC Meu",$\Pwj~Cl Acccptan"h\GO5-DJ7 LUTC r.wjœt
Acccpmn""M~Il,,-'_d,.1C
MEETING DATE:
May 17'\ 2005
ITEM# "j[ Ce)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
2005 Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Program for City Hall (Area FlexPass)
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
ø CONSENT
D RESOLUTION
D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
D ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$9,544.00
$
,,----------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to the Land Use and Transportation Committee dated May 2nd, 2005.
--"-"...""...,...",,,-,,-_,____m_m______--------'--"_."'--'-'"""...m,---
--""-"""""""""""",,...-m-,-
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Washington State's Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law was adopted by the 1991
Legislature and incorporated into the Washington Clean Air Act as RCW 70.94.521 through 70.94.551. Its intent is to
improve air quality and reduce fuel consumption and traffic congestion through employer-based programs by encouraging
the use of alternatives to single occupant vehicles (SOV) for the commute trip.
The law requires that aU major employers, both public and private, who employ one hundred (100) or more fuU~time
employees who are scheduled to anive at a single worksite between 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. to make a good faith effort as
defined in RCW 70.94.534(2) and to develop plans and programs to reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Single
Occupant Vehicle (SOV) commute trips. City Hall is one of 14 employers in Federal Way that are affected by the CTR
Law.
The City currently provides up to a $30 incentive in the form of Commute Bonus/Bonus Plus vouchers for employees
using alternative modes of transportation. The incentive program is funded via the City's one time 2003/2004 CTR
budget of $4,250. This one time budget has been exhausted and no funding is provided in the 2005/2006 budget.
The incentive program has been very effective in reducing single occupancy vehicles (SOV). Currently, there are about 15
employees participating in the incentive program. Staff anticipated employee participation to increase to about 25
employees or about 9% of all employees due to more employees being located in City Hall. Based on our current $30 per
month incentive, guaranteed ride home and minor internal promotion, staff anticipates spending $9,544 for the 2005 CTR
Incentive program.
--------------,-,--"""""""
---------------------------------------- -------,,--,------------------------
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its May 2nd, 2005 meeting, the Land Use and
Transportation Committee forwarded the following staff recommendations:
1. Staff recommends that the Committee authorize staff to enter into an agreement with King County,
Pierce Transit and Sound Transit to purchase FlexPass for City Hall employees.
------------------------------------------------------_m_m______---
2. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to authorize staff to enter into an agreement with King County, Pierce
Transit and Sound Transit to purchase FlexPass for City Hal1 employees.
~~\
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLEDillEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05tlOt2001
CITY OF FEDERAl, WAY
MEMORANDUM
cc~rlf
DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
May 2nd, 2005
Land Use and Transportation Committee
David H. MOS~ager
Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer
2005 Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Program for City Hall (Area FlexPass)
POLICY QUESTION:
Should the council adopt a staff recommendation to continue Federal Way's compliance with Washington State's
Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law by purchasing Area FlexPasses for employees?
BACKGROUND:
Washington State's Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law was adopted by the 1991 Legislature and incorporated
into the Washington Clean Air Act as RCW 70.94.521 through 70.94.551. Its intent is to improve air quality and
reduce fuel consumption and traffic congestion through employer-based programs by encouraging the use of
alternatives to single occupant vehicles (SOV) for the commute trip.
The law requires that all major employers, both public and private, who employ one hundred (100) or more fun-
time employees who are scheduled to arrive at a single worksite between 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. to make a good
faith effort as defined in RCW 70.94.534(2) and to develop plans and programs to reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT) and Single Occupant Vehicle (SOV) commute trips. City Hall is one of 14 employers in Federal Way that
are affected by the CTR Law.
The City currently provides up to a $30 incentive in the fonn of Commute BonuslBonus Plus vouchers for
employees using alternative modes of transportation. The incentive program is funded via the City's one time
2003/2004 erR budget of $4,250. This one time budget has been exhausted and no funding is provided in the
2005/2006 budget.
The incentive program has been very effective inr~ducing single occupancy vehicles (SOV). Currently, there are
about 15 employees participating in the incentive program. Staff anticipated employee participation to increase to
about 25 employees or about 9% of all employees due to more employees being located in City Hall. Based on
our current $30 per month incentive, guaranteed ride home and minor intemalpromotion, staff anticipates
spending $9,544 for the 2005 CTR Incentive program.
PROJECT SAVINGS AND CONTINGENCY:
Proposed Area Flex Pass for City Hall Employee
The Area FlexPass program is a low-cost annual pass sponsored through King County Metro. The program
includes elements beyond the nonnaI bus pass at the price of $40 per person per year. The City may elect to
purchase the pass for either all 176 affected full time employees starting work between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. or
all full time employees in City Hall, whether they use it or not. Based on 176 affected employees at City Hall, the
Area FlexPass will cost approximately $7,040 for 2005. Please note that the price of the Area FlexPass will likely
go up in years two and three of the agreement. Staff believes this is the most cost effective method of
implementing the CTR law for the City Hall site. Please see Table 1 for the existing arid proposed CTR elements
and costs associated with implementing the program.
As a major employer and the lead jurisdiction for implementing CTR among all affected employers in Federal
Way, it is important that we show our commitment to the spirit and to the goals of the CTR Law. Therefore, staff
is recommending purchasing the proposed Area FlexPass for the 176 affected employees at City HalL Staff
proposes the FlexPass be funded by any remaining Public Works Department funds at the end of the year and/or
the City Managers Contingency fund.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Committee authorize staff to enter into an agreement with King County,
Pierce Transit and Sound Transit to purchase FlexPass for City Hall employees.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Forward staff recommendation to purchase FlexPass for City Hall employees to the May 17, 2005 City Council
Consent Agenda.
k:\lutc\lutc memo template - new.doc
Table I - City Hall CTR Program
CTR Program Element
Existing Program
(Old City Hall)
Existing Progam
(New City Hall)
Proposed FW Area
FlexPass
Guaranteed Ride Home - Emergency ride for users of
all alternative modes. Contract with Metro's Home
Free Guarantee program at $2.00 per person per year
for full time employees. Limit 8 rides/person/year, and
60 miles per ride.
Bus. Vanpool. Ferry SubsidY - Voucher to supplement
fares. Provides one mechanism to subsidize multiple
transit systems. Provide "Commuter Bonus" vouchers
at a recommended $30 per month per year user to
supplement fares. Estimated use is 9.0% of full time
employees at new City Hall.
Unlimited free Rides on all King County Metro, Sound
Transit, and Pierce Transit buses
$250.00 $544.00
125 employees * $2 per 272 Employees * $2 per
person per year person per year
Included
$2t880.00 $9,000.00
8 Employees at $30 per 25 Employees at $30
month per month
Inc!uded
Included
$20 toward Vanshare fare ($50 fare for the group)
Included
$65 Vanpool toward fare
..
Included
Enhance existina proaram - Increase visibility of $2,640.00
cu rrent. prog ra~ eleme.nts in cl u.d~ng i n~ern al . $200.00 $200.00 $15 C B voucher with
promotions, prize drawing, particIpate In regIonal each flex pass
promotions. purchase
Est. Program Cost per Year
$3t330.00
$9t544.00
$7 tO40.00
. $7,040 is based on 176 fu II time employees starting work between 6-9 AM. Additional 15% discount if purchased for all 272 employees.
** The price of the Area FlexPass will likely go up in year two and three.
MEETING DATE:
May 17th, 2005
ITEM# jL ({,)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
23rd Ave. S. and S. 311h St. (Private Road) Trafflc Signal Project-Project Acceptance
CATEGORY:
IS] CONSENT
D RESOLUTION
D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
BUDGET IMPACT:
D ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$207,415.56
$
.........,..,..,....,..,..-..........-.....-.......
"""",'"",'mm'm....'"
ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to the Land Use and Transportation Committee dated May 2,2005.
m..""..mm....-.........-.-.-.......,.",.,..."....m..""'.. .......-........-................."'.."m'..m...."".."""-""'" .......--..'..""""..""""m.. """'-'---......-..'...."..m"""""'..""'..m"'" .......-..-..-............-..........-.......
m""""""'-""'-'-"--"""'-""'"
...."........m"""""'..m..'......"""'-""'"
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Prior to release of retain age on a Public Works construction project, the City
Council must accept the work as complete to meet State Department of Revenue and State Department of Labor
and Industries requirements. The above referenced contract with Potelco, Inc. is complete. Upon City
Council's acceptance of the project, and meeting certain conditions by State law, the City will release and pay
in full the amounts retained during perfonnance of the contract.
..........,..,......"""",..,.-.,..... """'-""'-..........".."""'."'."""'.."
......._.m"...........m...."
.......-..-.-...-....-.......
....m"......m..........m"'........"m..
.......-..-.........-....-......
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its May 2nd, 2005 meeting, the Land Use and
Transportation Committee forwarded the following staff recommendations:
1. Option 1: Authorize final acceptance of the completed 23rd Avenue South and South 314th Street
(Private Road) Traffic Signal Project, constructed by Potelco, Inc., in the amount of $207,415.56 as
complete.
.......-.....-..........-....-....-...........m..m........m..........""-........-..--.........-._~................................_,_......__._........._.._.-.._................m..............m............m'...."....-.."'-'--"""""-"-""'-""'" .......--....-......-....-.-..-.........-....-....... """""""""'."""""""""""'..................
""mm......"...."'-"""'..-"""-""'"
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to authorize final acceptance of the completed 23rd Avenue South and South
, 314th Street (Private Road) Traffic Signal Project, constructed by Potelco, Inc., in the amount of$207,415.56 as
complete. "
~~~~:.._~--- -----
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
D APPROVED
D DENIED
D T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05tlOt2001
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
(CO~1f
May 2nd, 2005
Land Usc and Transportation Committee
David H. Mos~Managcr
Ken Miller,P.E.:DXp~ty Public Works Director
23rd Avenue South and South 311h Street (Private Road) Traffic Signal Project-
Project Acceptance
DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
~
POLICY QUESTION:
Should the Council accept the 23rd Avenue South and South 314th Street Traffic Signal Project
constructed by Potelco, Inc. as complete?
BACKGROUND:
Prior to release of retainage on a Public Works construction project, the City Council must accept the
work as complete to meet State Department of Revenue and State Department of Labor and Industries
requirements. The above referenced contract with Potelco, Inc. is complete. Upon City Council's
acceptance of the project, and meeting certain conditions by State law, the City will release and pay in
full the amounts retained during perfonnance of the contract.
PROJECT SAVINGS AND CONTINGENCY:
The final construction contract amount is $207,415.56, this is $6,957.62 below the $214,373.18 original
bid price, and $28,394.93 below the $235,810.49 budget (including contingency) that was approved by
the City Council on May 18,2004.
OPTIONS:
1. Authorize final acceptance of the completed 23rd Avenue South and South 314th Street (Private
Road) Traffic Signal Project, constructed by Potelco, Inc., in the amount of $207,415.56 as
complete.
2. Do not authorize tïnaI acceptance of the completed 23rd Avenue South and South 314th Street
(Private Road) Traffic Signal Project, constructed by Potelco, Inc. as complete and provide
direction to staff.
ST AFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends forwarding Option 1 to the May 3, 2005 City Council Consent Agenda for Approval:
Authorize final acceptance of the completed 23fd Avenue South and South 314th Street (Private
Road) Traffic Signal Project, constructed by Potelco, Inc., in the amount of $207,415.56 as
complete.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Forward the above staffreconunendation to the May 17, 2005 City Council Consent Agenda.
ee:
Project File - 23rd Ave Sand S 314 St Traffic Signal Project
Day File
K:.IXTC](\f,~.J -24"1)5 Uk<;¡a Wdiond ['mi"",':. Fi",'¡ :\,o(:<,pt.(!üç
MEETING DATE:
May 17,2005
ITEM#
~
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
Browns PointlDash Point Comprehensive Plan Amendment Resolution
CA TEGORY:
BUDGET IMP ACT:
0 CONSENT
¡z¡ RESOLUTION
¡z¡ CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$0
$0
$0
EXHIBITS: A) Resolution B) LUTC recommendation
SlJMMARY/BACKGROUND: On June 1,2004, City Council directed staff to apply for a Pierce
County Comprehensive Plan amendment to amend the County's comprehensive plan to add the
unincorporated portion ofthe Browns Point/Dash Point area to the City of Federal Way Urban
Growth/Service Area. City Council additiona11y directed staff to amend the City's comprehensive plan
accordingly, fo11owing passage of the Pierce County comprehensive plan amendment.
On November 15,2004, staff submitted a comprehensive plan amendment request to Pierce County.
Because the area in question is currently located within the Tacoma Urban Growth/Service Area, notice
was provided to City of Tacoma. On November 23, the City received a letter from City of Tacoma
genera11y opposing the amendment request and specifica11y questioning why the City has not amended the
Federal Way comprehensive plan prior to applying for the Pierce County comprehensive plan
amendment.
The purpose ofthe resolution is to forma11y show City's intent as indicated at the June 1,2004 Council
Meeting, to amend the City's comprehensive plan to reflect the proposed new Urban Growth/Service
Area if approved by Pierce County. Additionally, the resolution process provides opportunities for
Federal Way citizens to become involved in and comment on the issue.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On January 10,2005, the LUTC voted to
recommend that City Council approve the resolution re-asserting the City's intent to amend the City's
comprehensive plan to create a Browns Point/Dash Point Urban Growth/Service Area for Federal Way,
fol1owing passage of the City's requested amendment to the Pierce County comprehensive plan to
establish a Browns Point/Dash Point Urban Growth/Service Area for Federal Way.
PROPOSED MOTION: "1 move approval of the resolution re-asserting the City's intent to amend the
City's comprehensive plan to create a Browns Point/Dash Point Urban Growth/Service Area for Federal
Way, fo11owing passage of the City's requested amendment to the Pierce County comprehensive plan to
establish a Browns Point/Dash Point Urban Growth/Service Area for Federal Way."
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY 1TY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
REVISED - 05/10t2001
COUNCIL BILL #
ST
I" reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
MEETING DATE:
January 18, 2005
ITEM#
SUBJECT:
Browns Point/Dash Point Comprehensive Plan Amendment Re
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
......-.-.........-..-.................................................
m....".'m."""""""""""""""""""""""""'" .....................................
CATEGORY:
k8J CONSENT
k8J RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
$0
$0
$0
m...._m...._......................................."...........m
.............................."."
mm._.._mm.._.._..._mm.
EXHIBITS: A) Resolution B) LUTC recommendation
.................... ..mmmmmm....m...m...m..'" ..............mm.......mmmmmm._..mmmmmmm""""" .......................mm
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: On June 1,2004, C'
County Comprehensive Plan amendment to amend t
unincorporated portion of the Browns Point/Dash oi
Growth/Service Area. City Council additionall a'
accordingly, following passage of the Pierce
.........mmm. .m... mmm ..........._..mm"mmm.."."'...."""""""""""""""""""""..............................."...........
il directed s to apply for a Pierce
nty's comprehe ve plan to add the
ea to the City of Federal Way Urban
ed staff to amend the City's comprehensive plan
comprehensive plan amendment.
On November 15, 2004, staff submitted a c
Because the area in question is currently
was provided to City of Tacoma. On N
generally opposing the amendm n
Federal Way comprehensive pIa
amendment.
ehensive plan amendment request to Pierce County.
within the Tacoma Urban Growth/Service Area, noticc
ber 23, the City received a letter from City of Tacoma
t and specifically questioning why the City has not amended the
0 applying for the Pierce County comprehensive plan
The purpose ofthe resol . n fonnally show City's intent as indicated at the June 1,2004 Council
Meeting, to amend the Cl ' c mprehensive plan to reflect the proposed new Urban Growth/Service
Area if approved by Pier unty. Additionally, the resolution process provides opportunities for
Federal Way citizens to be e involved in and comment on the issue.
......................................................................................
CITY COUNCIL MMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On January 10,2005, the LUTC voted to
recommend that C' Council approve the resolution re-asserting the City's intent to amend the City's
comprehensive an to create a Browns Point/Dash Point Urban Growth/Service Area for Federal Way,
following pas ge of the City's requested amendment to the Pierce County comprehensive plan to
establish al} owns Point/Dash Point Urban Growth/Service Area for Federal Way.
,I
.mmmmmm m.l'........... ........ ....... mmmmm__mm__.mmmm mmmm -..... ............... ... m m.. mmmmm mmmm- m - mmm mmmmmm m m m- _mmm _mmm mm' mmm _m mmm m... m m-
P~SED MOTION: "I move approval of the resolution re-asserting the City's intent to amend the
CIty's comprehensive plan to create a Browns Point/Dash Point Urban Growth/Service Area for Federal
Way, following passage of the City's requested amendment to the Pierce County comprehensive plan to
establish a Browns Point/Dash Point Urban Growth/Service Area for Federal Way."
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: -~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
D APPROVED
~ ~ DENIED -It . L
~. TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 7flÎ/~(èi)
D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances o¥
REVISED - 05/10/2001
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
DRAFT
'n/ Ð>
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION O}~ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, RE-AFFIRMING THE
CITY'S INTENT TO AMEND THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN TO ADD THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF
BROWNS POINTIDASH POINT TO THE CITY'S URBAN
GROWTH/SERVICE AREA FOLLOWING PASSAGE BY
PIERCE COUNTY OF THE CITY'S REQUEST TO AMEND
THE COUNTY'S URBAN GROWTH AREA.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, has determined that it
is in the best interest and general welfare of the City of Federal Way and the Browns Point/Dash
Point area (map attached as Exhibit A) to allow residents of the area the option of annexing to
the City of Federal Way; and
WHEREAS, the Browns PointlDash Point area is currently within the Urban Growth/Service
Area of Tacoma; and
WHEREAS, the Pierce County Countywide Plmming Policies allow an unincorporated area to
be simultaneously located within the Urban Growth/Service Area of more than one city; and
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way has initiated a Pierce County comprehensive plan
amendment to amend the County's Comprehensive Plan to add the Browns Point/Dash Point
area to the Federal Way Urban Growth/Service Area; mId
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Federal Way has determined that the most logical
sequence of events is to wait until after Pierce County issues a decision regarding the City's
request to amend the County comprehensive plan and if successful proceed to amend the City's
comprehensive plan to create a Browns/Dash Point Urban Growth/Service Area for Federal
Way; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted its comprehensive plan with land use map
(the "Plan") on November 21, 1995, and adopted development regulations and a zoning map
Res- # ---- Page 1
implementing the Plan on July 2, 1996; and subsequently amended the comprehensive plan, land
use map, and zoning map on December 23, 1998, September 14, 2000, November 1, 2001,
March 27,2003, and July 20,2004; and
WHEREAS, on June 1, 2004 the Federal Way City Council voted to amend the City's
comprehensive plan to create a Browns PointlDash Point Urban Growth/Service Area; and
Now THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOL YES AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Public Interest. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Federal Way
and the Browns PointlDash Point area would be served by amending the City's comprehensive
plan to establish a Browns Point/Dash Point Urban Growth/Service Area for Federal Way.
Section 2. Timing. The City Council desires to amend the City's comprehensive plan
following passage by Pierce County of the City's request to amend the County's comprehensive
plan.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution should
be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause, or phrase of this resolution.
Section 4. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority, and prior to the effective date,
of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 5. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by
the Federal Way City Council.
Res. #- Page 2
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this
day of
2005.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Mayor, Dean McColgan
A ITEST:
City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION No:
Res. #~ Page 3
j /
. :
. .
. '2
:>
......
6
1i
-0
<::
Q)
~
. '" ,,'~
k'1 ' ';~' . ...:. J
~ ~ . "
.~ . .-;~- . ~f;' ,;;;.' ~ ~
. ~'fIE¡ Q)
õ:
Legend
D', " P"rop, osed Fe,deral Way-
Browns Point USA
* Note: Proposed Federal Way
UGAflJSA coinsides with the boundaries
of the Tacoma USA
EXHIBIT"',',.'{A~
PAGE -L- OF,
-1
Puget
Sound
,~
-LS~_~2'J_S7
_. .
.,- ~~----:.,~
i",
~
§
~
.2
City of
Federal Way
Proposed Federal Way
Browns Point
UGA-USA
~~ Federal Way
."'~: :,,-e
;;:'1:: =e:e'. -Nay,
33325 8:- -~-~e S,
;~~;'~3ti~:t h 98003
www. cllyoii eae raiway. com
; ,
"';"
1.000 '
1 Feet
IlerikelCdlpaat8ro\M12.n1Ird
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
January 4,2005
VIA:
FROM:
anage!,--- /
~-L--.
Kathy McClung, CDS Director
Isaac ConI en, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Brown' sID ash Point Resolution
Policy Question
Should City Council pass a resolution re-affirming the City's intent to amend the City's
Comprehensive Plan to establish a Brown's PointlDash Point Urban Growth/Service Area (PAA)
for Federal Way?
Background
On June 1,2004 (minutes attached as Attachment D), City Council directed staff to apply for a
Pierce County Comprehensive Plan amendment to amend the County's Comprehensive Plan to
add the unincorporated portion ofthe Brown's Point/DashPoint area to the City of Federal Way
Urban Growth/Service Area. City Council additionally directed staff to amend the City's
Comprehensive Plan accordingly, following passage of the Pierce County comp plan
amendment.
On November 15, 2004 staff submitted a Comprehensive Plan amendment request to Pierce
County. Because the area in question is currently located within the Tacoma Urban
Growth/Service Area, notice was provided to City of Tacoma. On November 23, the City
. received a letter from City of Tacoma (Attachment C) generally opposing the amendment
request and specifically questioning why the City has not amended the Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan prior to applying for the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
The purpose of the resolution is to formally show City Council's intent as indicated at the June 1,
2004 Council Meeting, to amend the City's Comprehensive Plan to reflect the proposed new
Urban Growth/Service Area if approved by Pierce County. Staff recommends waiting until the
outcome of the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan amendment is known before amending the
City's Comprehensive Plan.
1
Options
1. "I move that City Council pass a resolution re-affinning the City's intent to amend the
Federal Way comprehensive plan to establish a Brown's Point/Dash Point Urban
Growth/Service Area for Federal Way, following passage of the City's Pierce County
comprehensive plan amendment request"
2. "I moye that City Council not pass a resolution re-affinning the City's intent to amend
the Federal Way comprehensive plan to establish a Brown's Point/Dash Point Urban
Growth/Service Area for Federal Way, following passage of the City's Pierce County
comprehensive plan amendment request"
Staff recommendation
Option 1: "I move that City Council pass a resolution re-affinning the City's intent to amend the
Federal Way comprehensive plan to establish a Brown's Point/Dash Point Urban Growth/Service
Area for Federal Way following passage of the City's Pierce County comprehensive plan
amendment request"
Committee recommendation
FolWard option ~ to the full City Council for approval.
AL OF COMMITTEE REPORT:
....~
Attachments: (
(B)
(C)
(D)
Draft Resolution
Brown's Point/Dash Point Map
Letter from City of Tacoma
June 1, 2004 Council Minutes
2
EXHIBIT
PAGE /
A OF G'KhÚ3,í ß
OE 3" -
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, RE-AFFIRMING THE
CITY'S INTENT TO AMEND THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN TO ADD THE UNINCORPORA TED AREA OF
BROWN'S POINTIDASH POINT TO THE CITY'S URBAN
GROWTH/SERVICE AREA FOLLOWING PASSAGE BY
PIERCE COUNTY OF THE CITY'S REQUEST TO AMEND
THE COUNTY'S URBAN GROWTH AREA.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, has detennined that it
is in the best interest and general welfare of the City of Federal Way and the Brown's PointlDash
Point area to allow residents of the area the option of annexing to the City of Federal Way; and
WHEREAS, the Brown's PointlDash Point area is currently within the Urban Growth/Service
Area of Tacoma; and
WHEREAS, the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies allow an unincorporated area to
be simultaneously located within the Urban Growth/Service Area of more than one city; and
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way has initiated a Pierce County comprehensive plan
amendment to amend the County's Comprehensive Plan to add the Brown's PointlDash Point
area to the Federal Way Urban Growth/Service Area; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Federal Way has detennined that the most logical
sequence of events is to wait until after Pierce County issues a decision regarding the City's
request to amend the County comprehensive plan and if successful proceed to amend the City's
comprehensive plan to create a Brown'slDash Point Urban Growth/Service Area for Federal
Way; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted its comprehensive plan with land use map
(the "Plan") on November 21, 1995, and adopted development regulations and a zoning map
implementing the Plan on July 2, 1996; and subsequently amended the comprehensive plan, land
Res. #_Page I
EXHIBIT A I.,ÇE:XH/B¡r- t3
PAGE 2- DE 3 "
use map, and zoning map on December 23, 1998, September 14, 2000, November 1, 2001,
March 27,2003, and July 20,2004; and
WHEREAS, on June 1, 2004 the Federal Way City Council voted to amend the City's
comprehensive plan to create a Brown's Point/Dash Point Urban Growth/Service Area; and
Now THEREfORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Public Interest. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Federal Way
and the Brown's Point/Dash Point area would be served by amending the City's comprehensive
plan to establish a Brown's Point/Dash Point Urban Growth/Service Area for Federal Way.
Section 2. Timing. The City Council desires to amend the City's comprehensive plan
following passage by Pierce County of the City's request to amend the County's comprehensive
plan.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution should
be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause, or phrase of this resolution.
Section 4. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority, and prior to the effective date,
of the resolution is hereby ratified and affinned.
Section 5. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by
the Federal Way City Council.
Res. # - Page 2
.
EXHIBIT A OF E~HlÞir 8
",-.
PAGE 3 OE 3
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this
day of
2005.
CiTY OF FEDERAL WAY
Mayor, Dean McColgan
A TIEST:
City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC
ApPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION No:
Res. #- Page 3
City of
Federal Way
Puget
Sound
'~ :ic ,i "
Federal -.- c.,(-t,~ ~
~;í~~,.,.",:"-,',.,,.,'.',":'.,-.,':.,,'..-:'.',~,',,',",~,.,.<"...,...".11].,:"""".,..,:.~,','.:,-.,:.','.-,','...',' ~
.~¡~ ¡
>~()¡,~ '§
'~~~~ ~
.t~ -&1
'"
=>
.ši
a¡
"'"
<::
$
-=
.!i!
c.
'"
E
'"
:E
t-
o;
Õ
Z
0>
!Q
0>
ö:
Legend
J Proposed Federal Way -
Browns Point USA
Zoning
D Moderate Density Single,Family
I'.:"".'-,,I Neighborhood Center
. Note: Proposed Federal Way
U.S.A coinsides with the boundaries
of the Tacoma USA
Proposed Federal Way
Browns Point USA
Zoning
Map Dale: November 2ûû4
City of Federal Way,
33325 8th Ave S,
Federal Way. WA 98ûO3
(253) 835 70ûO
WNW, cilyoffederalway -com
Scale: ~
0 500 1,000 N
~Feet
A Federal Way
lIerikelcdJpaa/Browns_ffixd
.'-.t'"
, ~~~~
. ~
. - '-"1
Tacoma
1""- .
C RECEIVED BY
OMMUN/TY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
NO \i ,;t ,',," 7[)O j
, '-"", . l"
Çity of ThcOlll,q".'"
- -'lucöma EconomiC-Development Department..
November 22, 2004
EXHIBrl c ðf ~XHißi=r ß
"""
p~2-
Ms. Kathy McClung, Director
City of Federal Way
Community Development Services
33325 Eighth Avenue South
P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, W A 98063-9718
Dear Ms. McClung:
Subject: Federal Way Annexation Elections
This is in response to your letter dated October 28, 2004, describing your intent to pursue an
amendment to the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan to establish an urban growth area (UGA)
for the City of Federal Way in the Browns Point and Dash Point areas.
The purpose of this letter is to express our strong objection to any amendment which would
create an overlap of Tacoma's designated UGA. Creation of an overlap serves to confuse the
residents and business owners in these areas about future governance and service provision. It
also appears to be premature since, to my knowledge, Federal Way has not amended its own
Comprehensive Plan to include these areas and yet intends to seek approval from Pierce County
elected officials before your own citizens have had an opportunity to have their say about the
proposed expansion of your city.
On the other hand, the Browns Point and Dash Point areas have been a part of Tacoma's urban
growth area since Interim UGAs were established by Pierce County. The Tacoma City Council
adopted a Resolution in 1992 which included these two areas in Tacoma's proposed UGA and
which was forwarded to the County Council for their adoption. The Tacoma City Council
adopted its GMA plan in October 1993 which included the two areas in our UGA and which
were confinned in 1994 when Pierce County adopted the urban growth area designations
compliant with the Growth Management Act.
Tacoma abuts these two areas on three sides while Federal Way's boundary primarily adjoins
Dash Point State Park and a small area to the west. These areas are served by Tacoma Public
schools, Metro Parks, and Tacoma utilities. Tacoma's street network intersects with the street
network found in these two areas. For these reasons and others, the Browns Point and Dash Point
areas are a natural expansion ~rea for the City of Tacoma when the citizens residing in these
areas wish to become a part ôf our city
747 Market Street, Room 900 I Tacoma. Washington 98402-3793 I (253) 591-5364
httpJIwww.cltyoftacoma.org
. .
Kathy McClung, Director
November 22, 2004 .
Page 2
lXHIBf¡ C
PAGE 2 OF..
of Bw-tli3/í B:>
',-
Z
In yðut'1ðtter, ou aBo~~btJd\¡,J¡.lt Tacoma's long- or short-tenn plans for these areas. Our
-"w Ion -tenn f~r TIt~is ~t changed since we first proposed these areas for designation
as part 0 acoma's ui1)a~ a'ea. In the short tenn, members of our City Council have
requested a study to assess the fiscal costs and benefits if annexation were to occur. This study is
currently underway.
,.
I would suggest that we meet in the near future to discuss Federal Way's interest in the Brown's
Point and Dash Point areas. I would be most interested in learning the rationale for pursuing
annexation in these areas and the information used to determine that this course of action is
warranted or desired by the affected citizens. Please call me at your earliest convenience to
establish a mutual agreeable time to meet.
~lY'
Ryan~~
Director
c:
Mayor Bill Baarsma and Members of the City Council
Jim Walton, City Manager
John Ladenburg, Pierce County Executive
STR DOCUMENT VIEW
- -
E.XHt[.;T
PAGE (
Fecif:ml Way Cio/ OUtncU R4gul4r Meeting Mkul~
Jum I, 2004 -Page -i of9
Page 2 of 3
.. D ΠG:r<1--iIi3ir B
0 F.. 2.. .',
Item (b)/City Center Access Study/Stakeholder Selection Approval;
CouncHmember DOVQY noted he wouJd Like to have a staff update on th1iY item ir
there. are additiona1113Jl1es to add to the list.
Public Works Traffic Engineer Maryanne Zukowski was pleared to report thl
currently thjrty-two (32) members on the stakeholde-r list, . She. noted the list is CO!
of nineteen (19) citizens, seven (I) agency representaùves, imd six (6) elec:œd offic
COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY MOVED APPROVAL OF THE CITY CE
ACCESS STUDY/STAKEHOLDER SELECTION AS PRESEJ
COUNCILMEMBER PA"ItK SECOND. The maliGn passed as fOI10Wfi:
Burbidge
Dovey
Faison
Ferrell
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochma.r
McColgan
Park
Item (e)/Enterorìse Neighborhood Traffic Safetynrh Ave SW:
yes
yes
yes
Councilmember Dovey was plea&ed to see t.h.i~ item on tonight's agenda, as it is th
of concerned citiz.ens who went through the process to make changes ín their COnlll
COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY MOVED APPRQV AL OF ITEM (e)J ENTER
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC SAFETY/,-re AVE SW AS PRESENTED¡ D:E
MAYOR KOCHMAR SECOND. The motion passed as follows:
Burbidge
Dovey
Faison
Ferrel]
yes
yes
yes
ye~
Koc.hmar
McColgan
Park
Item (q)fPotential Brown's Point Annexation Aæa:
yes
yes
ye~
Counc.ilmembe.r Faison noted this item wu forwarded from the Land Use/Tramp,
Committee full CouncîJ wirh the recommendatîonto initiate a Pierce
Comprehensive Plan amendment which would give the citizens a. choice between
or King. County. Aftet discussing with colleagues and ~taff, he. prefers to forward
http://intranetfederaIway.locaIlweblink/Doc View.asp?DocumentID= 189935&FolderID=46... 1/5/2005
STR DOCUMENT VIEW
- -
Page 2 of 3
EXHIBIT D .~ - ~~-
PAGE ¡ OF.. 2
Fetleral Wa"v City Couni:ll Regular Mi!i?iing Mlnufex
June 1. 1004 - PfLxe 5 of r¡
DISCUSSION WITH CITY OF TACOMA, (2) INITIATE PIERCE CO
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTt (3) PROCESS FEDERAL
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS - SEPA REVIEW, (4) GA
ADDITIONAL GIS DATA; COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY SECOND. The
passed as follows:
Burbidge
Dovey
FaÍ!mn
Ferren
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
V1.
PUBLIC HEARING
Potential Annexation Area SWlllea Plan
Mayor McColgan read procedures to be followed for the Public Hearing and opened
he:a.rìng at 7:25 p,m. .
Councilmember Ferrell announced he would recuse rumseif and left Council Charnbi
the Public Hearing portion of the agenda.
. Staff Report
Federal Way's P1anning Consultant Gregg Dorhn made a brief presentation to ¡
regarding the Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan.
. Citizen Comment
Suzie Horan spoke in support of the rezone of the Jackson property.
Thoma& Barnes spoke in support of the rezone of the Jackson property.
Carla LaSteUa spoke in opposition of changing the zoning on the Jackson property
Brvan Cope spoke in opposition of chAnging the zoning on the Jackson property.
Louise Davis spoke in :mpport of rezoning her propert)!.
http://intranet.federalway.Iocal/weblinkIDocView. asp ?DocumentID= 18993 5 &F 0IderID=46... 1/5/2005
MEETING DATE:
May 17,2005
ITEM# ::Y I -W
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
SELECTION OF VOTING DELEGATES FOR 2005 A WC ANNUAL BUSiNESS MEETING
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
D CONSENT
D RESOLUTION
ßJ CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
D ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: None
SUMMARY/BACKGROUNÐ: The Association of Washington Cities (A We) has asked the city to select up to three
city officials andlor city staff who will serve as voting delegates to represent the city at the 2005 ^ WC annual business
meeting. Following the selection, the City Clerk is directed to advise A WC of the city's voting delegates for 2005.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: nla
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of
delegates at the 2005 A WC annual business meeting."
(delegate names)
to serve as the city's voting
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
-~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFlCE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
D APPROVED
D DENIED
D TABLEDillEFERREDINO ACTION
D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances on~y)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
._--~
REVISED - 05/10/2001
MEETING DATE:
May 17,2005
ITEM# ::vlL (4 )
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Kitts Corner
--------.-......._.._mm........m__m_-
mm........m..mm....mm".....--.-----------..--..--....-.-......--._..._....._m-____m_m...m._.. ...- ...-.-.....---... ....-_._..._..m_'---_..._.-........-.--.-.-.- ""'-"---------"-____....m.
CATEGORY:
D CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
¡g¡ ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
BUDGET IMPACT:
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
--..-..-.............m.._._.........m.......___-..
. -...............mm._mm....m_m..___"-------
"--------..-....._........m._._.._.
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Draft' Adoption Ordinance with Exhibits AandB; 2) April 25, 2005, Memorandum to the Land
Use/Transportation Conunittee (LUTe) with Exhibits 1 -- 13. (please note that due to their bulk, Exhibits 4 -- 13 are not included in
the City Council packet, but are available in the City Council Conference Room).
"SUMMARyjßACKGROUÑi);..mmF~de"ia¡'Wãy-adopted its Comprehensive-Plan in November of 1995, and amended the plãñ-in'
December of 1998, September 2000, November 2001, March 2003, and July 2004. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, the Growth
Management Act (OMA) limits plan updates to no more than once per year except under certain circumstances. The 2004
Comprehensive Plan amendments include three separate actions: proposed amendments to Chapter 5, "Housing" of the Federal
Way Comprehensive Plan; a request by the Puget Center Partnership for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone; and a
request by Jon Potter for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone for Kitts Corner. The Kitts Corner request was initiated
prior to the Puget Center Partnership request and the proposed amendments to the Housing Chapter. The three actions are being
considered on separate agenda bills with separate ordinances, but will be acted upon simultaneously to amend the comprehensive
plan in order to comply with RCW 36.70A.130. Staff recommended approval of the Kitts Corner request based on a legislative
comprehensive plan amendment and conditional rezone with eight conditions of approval as outlined in Section 2 of the Draft
Adoption Ordinance (pages 5-9).
....................m....m..... ...................mmmmmm..........mmmmm...._.__.. ..... -.........-.--._".._..m__..- m_m_____m.._____-------'----"""---"---------------
------.---..___..-m-
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LUTC discussed the staff recommendation during a public
meeting on May 2,2005. At the close of this meeting, the LUTC made a motion to recommend approval of the Kitts Comer Request
to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of approximately 46 acres located south of South 3361h Street and
west of Pacific Highway South from Business Park (BP) to Communi~ Business (Be) and Multi-Family (RM 2400), with
approximately 17.7 acres located east of the southerly extension of 13 Place South to. be designated Community Business
(BC) and approximately 28.4 acres located west of the southerly extension of 13th Place South to be designated Multi-Family
(RM 2400), based on a legislative comprehensive plan amendment and conditional rezone with eight conditions of approval as
outlined in Section 2 of-the Draft Adoption Ordinance (pages 5M8).
---_.._--------_.._----..------~_..__.._.._----_.._......m_......_........--..............-....-..-..------......--..---._..........m.._......._-.-.---------..--------------.--_.._-----._----
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the ordinance adopting amendments to the comprehensive plan and enactment on
June 7, 2005."
~~~~-
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0
0
0
0
APPROVED
DENIED
T ABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION
MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
370
Revised ~ OS/IOI2001
1:\2004 Comprehensive Plan\2004 Update\City Council\Kitts Comer CC Cover Agenda.doctOStO91200S 4;SS PM
ORDINANCE NO.
DRAFT
:>//ö/ðS-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S GROWTH
MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, APPROVING A CHANGE IN
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY
46 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 336TH STREET AND WEST OF PACIFIC
HIGHWAY SOUTH FROM BUSINESS PARK (BP) TO COMMUNITY BUSINESS
(BC) AND MULTI-FAMILY (RM 2400), BASED ON SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
(AMENDING ORDINANCE NO'S. 90-43, 95-248, 96-270, 98-330, 00~372, 01-
405, 03~442, 04-460, 04-461, 04-462).
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act of 1990, as amended, (Chapter 36.70A RCW or "OMA")
requires the City of Federal Way to adopt a comprehensive plan which includes a land use element (including a
land use map), housing element, capital facilities plan element, utilities element, and transportation element
(including transportation system map [ s]); and
WHEREAS, the GMA also requires the City of Federal Way to adopt development regulations
implementing its comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted its comprehensive plan with land use map (the
"Plan") on November 21, 1995, and adopted development regulations and a zoning map implementing the
Plan on July 2, 1996; and subsequently amended the comprehensive plan, land use map, and zoning map on
December 23, 1998, September 14,2000, November 1, 2001, March 27,2003, and July 20,2004; and
WHEREAS, the City may consider Plan and development regulation amendments pursuant to Article
IX, Chapter 22 ofthe Federal Way City Code (FWCC); and
WHEREAS, under RCW 36. 70A.130, the Plan and development regulations are subject to continuing
review and evaluation, but the Plan may be amended no more than one time per year; and
WHEREAS, the Council shall be considering three separate actions to amend the comprehensive plan,
all of which will be acted upon simultaneously in order to comply with RCW 36. 70A.130; and
WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 05-~, amendments to Chapter 5, "Housing," of the
Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; and
ORD#
,PAGE I
WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 05-_, approving a change in comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of South 312th Street and east of 1 st Avenue South from
Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN), based on specific conditions as contained in
Ordinance No. 05-~; and
WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 05-_, approving a change in comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of approximately 46 acres located south of South 336th Street and west of Pacific
Highway South from Business Park (BP) to Community Business (BC) and Multi-Family (RM 2400), based
. on specific conditions as contained in Ordinance No. 05-~; and
WHEREAS, as a result of this action, approximately 17.7 acres located east of the southerly extension of
13 th Place South would be designated Community Business (Be) and approximately 28.4 acres located west of
the southerly extension of 13th Place South would be designated Multi-Family (RM 2400); and
WHEREAS, in April 1999, the City of Federal Way accepted a request from four property owners
(Campus Gateway, Merlino, Chase WN Trust, and Wright) to change the comprehensive plan and zoning of
approximately 42 acres located south of South 336th Street and west of Pacific Highway South, thereafter
known as the Kitts Comer request; and
WHEREAS, in June 1999, the City Council detennined that the request should be analyzed further and
added the Kitts Comer LLC, Nelson, Carson, Jones, and Slisco parcels to the Campus Gateway, Merlino,
Chase WN Trust, and Wright for a totat' of 46.12 acres; and
WHEREAS, in July 2001, the City's SEPA Responsible Official issued a Detennination of
Nonsignificance on the 2001 comprehensive plan amendments, which included Kitts Corner; and
WHEREAS, in August 2001, the applicant withdrew the request for a Multi-Family comprehensive plan
designation and RM zoning for the area west of the on-site wetland (Wetland No.2 as shown in the Settlement
Agreement and Covenant recorded under Recording No. 9704211043); and
ÛRD#
, PAGE 2
WHEREAS, in September 2001, the applicant submitted a new application for a comprehensive plan
designation of Multi-Family and zoning ofRM 2400 for the area west of Wetland No.2; and
WHEREAS, in November 2001, the City of Federal Way's Land Use/Transportation Committee gave
direction that a development agreement and development plan be prepared for Kitts Comer, east of Wetland
No.2; and
WHEREAS, in March 2003, per Ordinance 03-442, the City of Federal Way adopted a comprehensive
plan designation and zoning of Multi-Family and RM 2400 for the area west of Wetland No.2, based on it
being included in the overall Kitts Comer development agreement and development plan; and
WHEREAS, in September 2004, the applicant submitted an application for approval ofa development
agreement and development plan for Kitts Comer; and
WHEREAS, in March 2005, a SEPA Addendum was issued for Kitts Comer; and
WHEREAS, in March 2005, the City infonned the applicant that they were initiating a legislative
comprehensive plan amendment and conditional rezone; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Kitts Comer legislative comprehensive plan amendments and conditional
rezone address all of the goals and requirements set forth in the GMA; and
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way, through its staff, Planning Commission, City Council committees,
and full City Council has received, discussed, and considered the testimony, written comrtlents, and material
from the public, as follows:
1. On September 19, 2001, the City's Planning Commission considered the Kitts Comer request for
a comprehensive plan designation of Community, Business and zoning of BC, based on a
development agreement for the area east of Wetland No.2;
2. On November 6, and November 20,2002, the City's Planning Commission considered the Kitts
Comer request for a comprehensive plan designation of Multi-Family and zoning ofRM 2400 for
the area west of Wetland No.2, based on its inclusion in the development agreement and
development plan to be prepared for the site;
ÛRD#
, PAGE 3
3. On May 2, 2005, the Land Use/Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council
considered the request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of approximately
46 acres located south of South 336th Street and west of Pacific Highway South from Business
Park (BP) to Community Business (Be) and Multi-Family (RM 2400), with approximately 17.7
acres located east of the southerly extension of 13th Place South to be designated Community
Business (BC) and approximately 28.4 acres located west ofthe southerly extension of 13111 Place
South to be designated Multi-Family (RM 2400), based on conditions recommended by staff,
following which it recommended adoption of the staff recommendations;
4. The full City Council considered the matter at its meetings on May 17,2005, and June 7, 2005;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to approve the change in comprehensive plan designation and
zoning of approximately 46 acres located south of South 336111 Street and west of Pacific Highway South trom
Business Park (BP) to èommunity Business (Be) and Multi-Family (RM 2400), based on specific conditions
as contained in Section 2 of this ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, does hereby ordain as
follows:
Section 1. Findim!:s.
A.
The proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan map, as set forth in Exhibit A attached
hereto, to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of approximately 46 acres located south of
South 336111 Street and west of Pacific Highway South from Business Park (BP) to Community Business (Be)
and Multi-Family (RM 2400), based on conditions of approval set forth in Section 2below will allow
development of the site in response to market conditions and the Council' svision for development of the site,
while providing for transportation facilities to serve the site and improving circulation in the vicinity, and
therefore bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; are in the best interest of the
residents of the City; and are consistent with the requirements ofRCW 36.70A, the King County Countywide
Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the Plan.
ORD#
, PAGE 4
B.
The proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan map, asset forth in Exhibit A attached
hereto, are compatible with adjacent land uses and will not negatively affect open space, streams, lakes, or
wetlands, or the physical environment in general. They will allow for growth and development consistent with
the Plan's overall vision and with the Plan's land use element household and job projections, and will allow
reasonable use of property subject to constraints necessary to protect environmentally sensitive areas. They
therefore bear a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; are in the best interest of the
residents of the City; and are consistent with the requirements ofRCW 36.70A, the King County Countywide
Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the Plan.
C.
The proposed amendments to the Zoning Map, set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto, are
consistent with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan and the comprehensive plan land use map
proposed to be amended in Section 3 below, bear a substantial relation to public health, safety, atJ.d welfare,
and are in the best interest of the residents of the City.
Section 2. Conditions of Approval.
The request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of approximately 46
acres located south of South 336111 Street and west of Pacific Highway South from Business Park (BP) to
Community Business (BC) and Multi-Family (RM 2400), with approximately 17.7 acres located east of the
southerly extension of 13 th Place South to be designated Community Business (Be) and approximately 28.4
acres located west of the southerly extension of 13th Place South to be designated Multi-Family (RM 2400),
shall be approved based on the following conditions:
1.
Prior to construction of any new buildings, a single Master Plan for the entire MuIti-
Family (RM 2400) and Community Business (BC) zoned site shall be submitted to and approved by the City.
Application for critical area intrusions as applicable is also required in conjunction with master plan review. A
project action State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) review shall also be conducted in conjunction with
master plan and critical area review. Subsequent to Master Plan approval, building design and minor
ORD#
, PAGE 5
modifications to the site plan shall be reviewed via a Process II, Site Plan Review. For the purposes of the
MasterPlan, the subject site is comprised of the following parcels: 202104-9069, 202104-9070, 202104-9001,
202104-9090, 202104-9086, 202104-9080, 202104-9072, and 202104-9004.
2. The Master Plan shall be developed with a cohesive and integrated design that
promotes the following:
a. Pedestrian scale, and pedestrian orientation and massing of buildings.
b. Site-wide pedestrian connectivity.
c. Building massing shall be designed to avoid large expanses of parking areas adjacent
to and/or visible from the public right-of.;ways. On-site parking shall not be allowed between buildings and
public right-of-ways, except the Director of Community Development Services may approve one double-
loaded parking row between a building and right-of-way due to extenuating circumstances.
d. The appearance of strip commercial development shall be minimized by breaking
large linear buildings into numerous smaller buildings.
e.
The commercial portion of the site may include a maximum of two primary anchor
buildings. The individual anchor buildings are pennitted a maximum 50,000 square feet of building footprint,
and the total gross floor area of all anchors shall not exceed 100,000 square feet of gross floor area. Anchor
facades shall not exceed a width to depth ratio of 1.5:1.
f.
Non-anchor buildings should not exceed 10,000 square feet of building footprint. The
Director of Community Development Services may approve a maximum of two, non-anchor buildings in
excess of 10,000 square feet of building footprint, up to a maximum of20,000 square feet of building footprint
each, when the applicant demonstrates the following:
(i) The additional square footage is necessary to accommodate the needs of a specific tenant.
(ii) The facades of the structure include significant structural modulation equal to at least ten
percent of the length ofthe subject façade.
(iii) The overall design of the building is consistent with the pedestrian scale and integrated
design of the overall site.
(iv) Non-anchor facades shall not exceed a width to depth ratio of2:1.
g. Primary commercial building entries shall be clearly visible and recognizable from the
public right-of-ways; or active building facades, including windows and pedestrian scale design amenities such
as screening, plazas, or art features such as trellises, artwork, murals, landscaping, or combinations thereof,
shall be required fronting the right-of-way.
h.
On-street parallel parking is encouraged where feasible.
ÛRD#
,PAGE 6
i.
A minimum of five percent of the gross land area of the commercial portion of the site
shall be pedestrian-oriented open space. There shall be one primary pedestrian gathering focal point, and
additional supporting pedestrian-oriented gathering locations distributed proportionally throughout the
commercial portion of the site. Open space areas and plazas shall include seating, landscaping, art,
ornamentation, pedestrian scale lighting, water features, and outdoor dining.
J.
Vehicular service stations are not pennitted. Fuel pump stations are only permitted
when accessory to an anchor tenant. Any approved fuel pump station shall not be oriented to the public right-
of-way, and shall not exceed two fuel islands with a total of up to eight vehicular fueling positions.
3. Development of the site shall include design, construction, and dedication of the
following public roadways in accordance with appropriate FWCC street sections:
a. 13th Place South from South 336th Street to the south property line;
b. South 340th Street from Pacific Highway South to the intersection of 13th Place South
extended;
c. A roadway connecting from South 336th Street through the residential area, connecting
to 13th Place South extended.
These public roadways are necessary to serve the proposed development and shall be
constructed as outlined below. Additional conditions (on-site and off-site) intended to mitigate significant
adverse environmental impacts may be required as determined through the SEP A process and will be applied
to any proposed project in the future.
a. Prior to occupancy of any residential building on the site, South 340th Street from
Pacific Highway South to the intersection of 13th Place South extended, and the roadway within the residential
area connecting to South 336th Street, shall be constructed to meet all applicable standards. Traffic calming
'devices such as speed humps, speed tables, traffic circles, chidl11es, curb extensions, signs, pavement markings,
or other calming devices as approved by the Public Works Director shall be incorporated within the residential
roadway. Signal modifications at Pacific Highway South and South 340th Street intersection may be required to
provide safe access.
Alternatively, the developer may construct the 'extension of 13th Place South from South 336th
Street to its intersection with the proposed residential road as a traffic circle. This would eliminate the need for
the construction of South 340tll Street from Pacific Highway South to the intersection of 13 tll Place South
extended, and the segment of 13th Place South between South 340th Street and the intersection of the residential
roadway (traffic circle).
ORD#
,PAGE 7
b. Prior to occupancy of any commercial building, 13th Place South from South 336th
Street to the south property line, and South 340th Street from Pacific Highway South to the intersection of 13 th
Place South extended, shall be constructed to all applicable standards. A new traffic signal (South 336th Street
& 13th Place South) and/or signal modifications (pacific Highway South & South 340th Street) may be required
as detennined through the SEP A process.
4. All new public streets shall include traffic calming features.
5.
Uses other than multi~unit housing and day care facilities that are otherwise permitted
in the RM zone are not allowed.
6. The multi~family portion of the site, west of Wetland No.2, shall be accessed from
one location along South 336th Street and shall include a public roadway connecting through the residential
area, across the existing berm of Wetland No.2, and connecting to 13th Place South extended.
7.
No more than one anchor building, or a maximum of 75,000 square feet of
commercial building area, may receive a Certificate of Occupancy on the site without the prior construction of
a minimum of75 residential units.
8. The residential area shall be designed to minimize reception of potential noise impacts
from adjacent nonresidential uses.
Section 3.
Comprehensive Plan Amendments Adoption.
The 1995 City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter amended in 1998,2000,2001,2003, and 2004, copies of which are on file
with the Office of the City Clerk, hereby are and shall be amended as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto.
Section 4. Amendment Authority. The adoption of Plan amendments in Section 3 above is pursuant
to the authority granted by Chapters 36.70A and 35A.63 RCW, and pursuant to FWCC Section 22-541.
Section 5. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The
invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity
of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the
ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 6. Savinl!s Clause. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter
amended in 1998, 2000, 200 I, 2003, and 2004 shall remain in force and effect until the amendments thereto
become operative upon the effective date of this ordinance.
ORD#
, PAGE 8
Section 7. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this
.ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 8: Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after
its passage, approval, and publication, as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this
,2005.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
day of
Mayor, Dean McColgan
A TIEST:
City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC
ApPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson
FILED WITIl TIlE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY TIlE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE No:
1:\2004 Comprehensive Plan\2004 Update\City Council\Kitts Corner Adoption Ordinance.doct5t912005 4:37 PM
ORD#
, PAGE 9
EXHIBIT A
TO
ADOPTION ORDINANCE.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan
2004 Site
Specific Request:
Kitts Corner
0 Comprehensive Plan
~ Wetlands (1998 City Survey)
Office
-1(
p.-~ar..
,~ . ~ >'
~ÞfD ~ .
IIIdlœsa
Park
"Comprehensive Plan
Amendment from Business
Park to Community .
Business and Multi-Family
subject to conditions.
Approved per Ordinance
No.
.
--
'"
...~.~"
~llt¡ÐiJ raliIJ
I
...... Ptñ
-
~:~7
i
.
", i
" i
i
i
-!
GII ldD1Ìlf "1IIIIIøBS
,..
0-
m
~
>-
+-'
'2
'õ
:>
EXHIBIT B
TO
ADOPTION ORDINANCE
City of Federal Way
Zoning
Legend
D Zoning
~ Wetlands (1998 City Survey)
*Rezone from
BP to BC and RM2400
subject to conditions.
Approved per Ordinance
No.
J.':~:-::
,:tf:
r".)
:'i¡
...1
J
- 0-
S 1-\ i
Ion N 0 > 250 500
I I 'Feet
A Federal Way
This map is accompanied by no warranties
and is simply a graphic representation.
EXHIBIT~r 8
,.,.
PAGE '3 OF.. 3
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this
day of
2005.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Mayor, Dean McColgan
ATTEST:
City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC
ApPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION No:
Res. #- Page 3
City of
Federal Way
Moderate Density Single. Family
Neighborhood Center
Legend
] Proposed Federal Way -
Browns Point USA
Zoning
D
~..'.....'......"'...'.
~
. Note: Proposed Federal Way
U.S.A coinsides with the boundaries
of the Tacoma USA
Puget
Sound
'!i~.~.~.'.."'..."....'....~. .E!
. '&~f~ ¡¡¡
',.ti ~
13
:ë
c.
~
0>
<II
æ
<L>
'"
::>
~
~
-c
c:
.B
.5
.22
c.
<II
E
'"
:ë
!-
¡,;
õ
Z
<L>
æ
<L>
a:
Proposed Federal Way
Browns Point USA
Zoning
Map Date: November 2004
City of Federal Way,
33325 8th Ave S,
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253) 835 7000
www.cityoffederalway.com
Scale: .\
a 500 1,000 N
~ Feet
A Federal Way
lie rikelcdlpaalBrown S.m xd
.
. -. '~1
Thcoma
~ ..JJJ ¡.
CO RECEIVED BY
MMUNITV DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
No v ';t ".". '7. [lOA
., , ,_'" " - .;,
.Çity of Thcorpq L, .',
Thcoma EconoMtc'Déveíopmcnt Department.
November 22, 2004
EXHIBrJ c * ¡ðXHi.~i=r L3
'...
P AGE-.!...OF.. Z-
Ms. Kathy McClung, Director
City of Federal Way
Community Development Services
33325 Eighth Avenue South
P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
Dear Ms. McClung:
Subject: Federal Way Annexation Elections
This is in response to your letter dated October 28, 2004, describing your intent to pursue an
amendment to the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan to establish an urban growth area (UGA)
for the City of Federal Way in the Browns Point and Dash Point areas.
The purpose of this letter is to express our strong objection to any amendment which would
create an overlap of Tacoma's designated UGA. Creation of an overlap serves to confuse the
residents and business owners in these areas about future governance and service provision. It
also appears to be premature since, to my knowledge, Federal Way has not amended its own
Comprehensive Plan to include these areas and yet intends to seek approval from Pierce County
elected officials before your own citizens have had an opportunity to have their say about the
proposed expansion of your city.
On the other hand, the Browns Point and Dash Point areas have been a part of Tacoma's urban
growth area since Interim UGAs were established by Pierce County. The Tacoma City Council
adopted a Resolution in 1992 which included these two areas in Tacoma's proposed UGA and
which was forwarded to the County Council for their adoption. The Tacoma City Council
adopted its GMA plan in October 1993 which included the two areas in our UGA and which
were confinned in 1994 when Pierce County adopted the urban growth area designations
compliant with the Growth Management Act.
Tacoma abuts these two areas on three sides while Federal Way's boundary primarily adjoins
Dash Point State Park and a small area to the west. These areas are served by Tacoma Public
schools, Metro Parks, and Tacoma utilities. Tacoma's street network intersects with the street
network found in these two areas. For these reasons and others, the Browns Point and Dash Point
areas are a natural expansion ~rea for the City of Tacoma when the citizens residing in these
areas wish to become a part ôf our city
747 Market Street, Room 900 I Tacoma. Washington 98402-3793 I (253) 591-5364
bttp:! /www.cltyoftacoma.org
Kathy McClung, Director
November 22, 2004 .
Page 2
lXHIBr¡ C
PAGE 2 OF..
of ~ 3/T -'3.
Z"'-
In Y~¡Urlette. f.' ou al.š.ol~brrJihb.J.¡t Tacoma's long- or short-tenn plans for these areas. Our ,.
'"",, ..loll -term f~r .t~ris ~t changed since we first proposed these areas for designation
as part 0 acoma!s ur' ja~ a'ca. In the short term, members of our City Council have
requested a study to assess the fiscal costs and benefits if annexation were to occur. This study is
cuITently underway.
I would suggest that we meet in the near future to discuss Federal Way's interest in the Brown's
Point and Dash Point areas. I would be most interested in learning the rationale for pursuing
annexation in these areas and the information used to determine that this course of action is
warranted or desired by the affected citizens. Please call me at your earliest convenience to
establish a mutual agreeable time to meet.
?h;IY'
Ryan~ ~
Director
c:
Mayor Bill Baarsma and Members of the City Council
Jim Walton, City Manager
Jolm Ladenburg, Pierce County Executive
STR_DOCUMENT- VIEW
Page 2 of 3
t_XHIf,;T
PAGE t
D oç (3¡4-¡ Bi r- B
0 F.. 2.. ~,
Feduvd WIi.Y c~ Council R41luklr Meetltr.g Mkul~
June I, 20fH -Pagt. 4 of?
Item (b)/Clty Ce-nter Ac~ess Study/Stakeholder Selection ADDrovaI:
CouncHmember Dovey noted he wou]d like to have a staff update on th1~ item it
there are additiona1 names to add to the Ust.
Public Works Traffic Engineer Maryanne Zukowski was pleared to report th~
currently thirty-two (32) members on the stakeholder list, . She. note<ì the list is COl
of nine.reen (19) citiz.ens seven (7) ageru;y representaûves, imd six (6) elec.ted offic
COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY MOVED APPROVAL OF THE CITY CE
ACCESS STUDY/STAKEHOLDER SELECTION AS PRESEJ
COUNCILMEMBER PARK SECOND. The motion passed as foI1ow~:
Burbidge
Dovey
Faison
Ferrell
yes
yes
yes
ye.-s
Kochma.r
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
Item (e)/Entcro!Ìse Nei~hborhood Traffic Safetyn,1¡ Ave SW:
Çouncilme.mber Dovey was pleased to see thi~ item on tonight'1i: agenda, as it is th
of concerned citizens who w~nt through the prœ~ss to make. changes in their conll1
COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY MOVED APPROVAL OF ITEM (e)1 ENTER
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC SAFETY /1fH AVE SW AS PRESENTED¡ HE
MAYOR KOCH MAR SECOND. The motion passed as follows:
Burbidge
Dovey
Faison
Ferrell
yes
yes
yes
ye~
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
ye.~
Item (g)fporential Brown's Point Annexation Area:
Councilmembe.r Faison noted this item wa.s: forwarded from the Land Use/Traru;p
COmInttt.e-e fun CouncîJ with the recommendation to initiate a Pierce
Comprehensive Plan amendment which wo1lId give the citizens a. choice between
or King County. After díscus&ing with colleagues and staff. he. prefer~ to forward
- --
http://intranetfederalway.locaI/weblink/Doc View .asp?DocumentID== 189935&F oIderID=46... 1/512005
STR DOCUMENT VIEW
- -
Page 2 of3
EXHIBIT D -. -~ .-
PAGE :l 0 F.. 2
Fr!tJeral Way CitY Cau,,¡:fJ. R£guCf11' M&.lUtg MUrrltes
Jfme. l. 2004 - PfLkt 5 0/9
DISCUSSION WITH CITY OF TACOMA, (2) INITrATE PIERCE CO
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, (3) PROCESS FEDERAL
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Al\'IENDMENTS - SEPA REVIEW, (4) GA
ADDITIONAL GIS DA TAt COUNCILMEMB~R DOVEY SECOND. The.
passed as follows:
Burbidge
Dovey
Faí~on
Ferrell
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
VI.
PUBLIC HEARING
Potential Annexation Area SubEU'ea Plan
Mayor McColgan read procedures to be followed for the Publk Hearing and opened
hearìfig at 7:25 p,m, .
Councilmembe-r FelTen announced he would recuse himself and left Coun.dl Chrotlbi
the Public Hearing portion of the agenda.
. Staff Report.
Federal Way's Planning Consultant Gregg Dornn made a brief presentation to I
regarding the Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan.
. Citizen Comment
Suzie Horan ~poke in support of the rezone of the Jackson property.
ThQma~ Barnes spoke in support of the rezone of the Jackson property.
Carla LaSteHa spoke in opposition of changing. the zoning on the Jackson property
Bryan Cope ~oke in opposition of chAnging the zoning an the Jackson prope.rty,
Louise Davis spoke in mpport of rezoning her property.
http://intranet.federalway.local/weblink/DocView .asp ?DocumentID== 18993 5 &F older ID=46... 1/5/2005
MEETING DATE:
May 17,2005
ITEM# Y I .W
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUB.TECT:
SELECTION OF VOTING DELEGATES FOR 2005 A WC ANNUAL BUSiNESS MEETING
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMP ACT:
0 CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
¡:g] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
A TT ACHMENTS: None
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The Association of Washington Cities (A We) has asked the city to select up to three
city officials and/or city staff who will serve as voting delegates to represent the city at the 2005 A WC annual business
meeting. Following the selection, the City Clerk is directed to advise A WC ofthe city's voting delegates for 2005.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: n/a
PROPOSED MOTION: "1 move approval of
delegates at the 2005 AWC annual business meeting."
(delegate names)
to serve as the city's voting
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
..~.
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COlJNcrL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVE}) TO SECOND READING (urdinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
ST .
l' rcadmg
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/1 Ot2001
APRIL 25, 2005
MEMORANDUM
TO
THE LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION
COMMITTEE
(Please note that due to their bulk, '
Exhibits 4 -- 1.3 are not included in
the City Council packet, but are.
available in the City Council
Conference. Room)
"TYO'.
Federa'IWay ,
I.
MEMO RAND UM
Apri125, 2005
To:
Jack Dovey, Chair, ,
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTe)
<. '
SUBJECT:
David Moseley, City Manager
Kathy McClung, Directqr of Conununity DeveloPment Services ~
Margaret H. Clark, NCP, Senior Planner ~
Jim Harris, Senior Planner :#/1- .
Summary of 2004 Comprehensive Plan Update, Kitts Corner Request
VIA:
FROM:
MEETING DATE: May 2, 2005
This is a summary of the attached report. Please read the report for a detailed history and for a list of
reconunended' conditions of approval. '
I.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
The Kitts Comer Request is a request from Jon Potter to change the 'comprehensive plan designation
and zoning of approximately 46 acres located south of South 336th Street and west of Pacific Highway
South ITom Business Park (BP) to Conununity Business (Be) and Multi-Family (RM 2400) (Exhibit
1). The applicant is requesting Community Business on the eastern portion of the site (approximately
17.7 acres located east of the southerly extension of 13th Place South) and RM 2400 (multi-family,
one unit per 2,400 square feet) consisting of approximately 28.4 acres located west of the southerly
extension of 13th Place South (Exhibit 2).
D. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY
. The Kitts Comer request was submitted originally in April 1999. It was reviewed as part of the 2001
Comprehensive Plan Amendments. In Novemb,er 2001, the LUTC gave dìrection that a development
agreement be prepared for the site. In September 2004, the applicant submitted an application for
approval of a development agreement and associated plan (Exhibit 3). In March 2005, the City
initiated a legislative comprehensive plan amendment and conditional rezone for the Kitts Comer site.
ID. REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Since November S, 2001, staff has been working with the applicants on a development plan that
meets the direction given to staff during the November S, 2001, LUTC meeting, and in subsequent
briefings. However, Mr. Potter has been unable to obtain the signatures of the owners of Parcels
, 202104-9080 (Ralph Jones) and 202104-9086 (CCD Enterprises Inc.). Going forward with the
"~
proposal with the exclusion of these parcels would result in an island of BP zoning surrounded by BC
(Exhibit 8). In a March 16, 2005 correspondence, the City notified Mr. Potter that they were initiating
a legislative comprehensive plan amendment and conditional rezone (Exhibit 7). This would allow the
request to go folWard as a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone based on specific conditions,
which would achieve the same result asa development agreement.
'.
In March 27,2003, the western portion of the site was given a comprehensive plan amendment and
zoning of Multi-Family (RM 2400), per Ordinance No. 03-442, based on a future development
agreement for the entire site. Since the request is no longer bei~ reviewed subject to a development
agreement, which was intended to apply to the entire site, the western portion of the site must also be
reviewed along with the eastern portion of the site pursuant to a legislative comprehensive plan
amendment and conditional rezone.
IV. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) PROCESS
The Kitts Comer comprehensive plan amendment and rezone was first submitted in 1999 and was
considered as part of the 200 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendments. based on the conceptual site plan
shown as Exhibit 9. A Determination of Non significance (DNS) (Exhibit 5) for this non-project was
issued on July 4. 2001. Although this was a non-project action. a conceptual site plan (Exhibit 9) was
used to analyze potential impacts. Subsequent to the November 5.2001. LUTC direction to prepare a
development plan. 'and after working with City staff. the applicant submitted a development plan on
September 3. 2004 (Exhibit 3). As shown in Exhibit 3, the 2001 conceptual site plan (Exhibit 9) has
. been modified in terms of the total number of acres. the number of acres to be designated multi~
family versus commercial. and the proposed uses.
Pursuant to WAC 197-11-600(3)(b)(i). an addendum (Exhibit 10) has been prepared to analyze
whether potential impacts associated with the changed action is likely to have significant adverse
impacts. This comparison identified no 'new or different environmental impacts beyond those
evaluated in the July 4. 2001. Determination ofNonsignificance.
V. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
2/19/05 Issuance of SEP A Addendum
5/2/05 Presentation to LUTC on Kitts Comer
5/17/05 City Council Public Meeting
6/7/05 Second City Council Public Meeting and Adoption of Ordinance
VI. STAFF REcoMMENDATION
~.
Staff recommends that the request from Jon Potter to change the comprehensive plan designation and
zoning of approximately 46 acres located south of South 336th, Street mid ~est of Pacific Highway
South from Business Park (BP) to Community Business (Be) and Multi-Family (RM 2400) be
approved based on conditions outlined on pages 9-11 of the attached full staff report.
I
1:\2004 Comprehensive P1an\2Q04 Update\LUTC\O50205 Summary of Kitts Comer Staff Rtport to the LUTC.docl4l2612005 1 :59 PM
Land Use/rransportation Committee
Summary of 2004 Comprehensive Plan Update, Kitts Comer Request
Meeting of May 2,2005
Page 2
~
CITY Of" - !:if
Federal Way
April 25, 2005
To:
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMO RAND UM
Jack Dovey, Chair
Land Userrransportation Committee (LUTC)
David ~anager
Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services ~
Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Sen~?r Planner ~
Jim Harris; Senior Planner c:9 It
2004 Comprehensive Pian Update, Kitts Corner Request
MEETING DATE: May 2, 2005
I.
BACKGROUND
The 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments includes the following three components:
1.
Kitts Corner Request -' Request from Jon Potter to change the comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of approximately 46 acres located south of South 336th Street
and west of Pacific Highway South from Business Park (BP) to Community Business
(BC) and Multi-Family (RM 2400) (Exhibit I). The applicant is requesting
Community Business on the eastern portion ofthe site (approximately 17.7 acres
located east of the southerly extension of 13th Place South) and RM 2400 (multi-
family, one unit per 2,400 square feet) consisting of approximately 28.4 acres located
west of the southerly extension of 13th Place South (Exhibit 2).
2.
Puget Center Partnership Request - Request from the Puget Center ,Partnership to
change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of
South 312m Street and east of 1 st Avenue South from Professional Office (PO) to
Neighborhood Business (BN).
3.
Housing Chapter Update - Update of "Chapter 5, Housing," of the Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan (FWCP).
This staff report pertains only to the Kitts Comer request The puget Center Partnership
Request and the proposed amendments to the Housing Chapter were presented to the
LUTC at their April 18, 2005, public meeting.
II.
KITTS CORNER SITE-SPECIFIC REQUEST
1. Background -
. The Kitts Comer request was submitted originally in April 1999. It was reviewed as part of the
2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments. In November 2001, LUTC gave direction that a
development agreement be prepared for the site. In September 2004, the applicant submitted
an application for approval of a development agreement and associated plan (Exhibit 3). In
March 2005, the City initiated a legislative comprehensive plan amendment and conditional
rezone for the Kitts Comer site. 1
2. Summary ~
File Number:
Parcel Numbers
Owners & Acreage:
05-lOl205-UP; 051O1207.SE
TABLE I
Number Parcel No. Owner Acres
1 202104.9069 Kitts Comer LLC 1.08 acres
2 202104-9070 Campus Gateway Associates 21.79 acres
3 202104.9001 James Merlino 8.87 acres
4 202104-9090 Curtis Nelson 0.52 acres
5 202104-9086 CCD Enterprises Inc. 0.17 acres
6 202104-9080 Ralph Jones 1.5 acres
7 202104-9072 . Chase WI Trust 7.75 acres
8 202104-9004 Andrew Slisco 4.44 acres
9 202104-90512 Bob Wright
TOTAL 46.12 acres
Location:
Size:
Applicant:
Owner:
Request:
South of South 1361h Street and west of Pacific Highway South
46.12 acres . .
Jon Potter
Please refer to Table I
Request to change the .comprehensive plan designation and zoning of
approximately 46 acres from Business Park (BP) to Community
Business (Be) and Multi-Family (RM 2400) (Exhibit 1). The applicant
is requesting BC on the eastern portion of the site (approximately 17.7
acres loeated east of the southerly extension of 13th Place South) and
RM 2400 (multi-family, one unit per 2,400 square feet) consisting of
approximately 28.4 acres located west ofthe southerly extension of
13ü, Place South (Exhibit 2). . .
Existing
Comprehensive Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Business Park
Business Park (BP)
I A history ofthe Kits Comer Request is contained in Section III of this staff report.
2 This parcel was included in the 2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments, but is not included in the present request.
Land Use/Transportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update, Kitts Comer Request
MeetingofMay2,2005
Page 2
Requested
Comprehensive Plan:
Requested Zoning:
III.
HISTORY
Community Business and Multi-Family
Community Business (BC) and Multi-Family (RM 2400)
The following summarizes the history of the Kitts Comer request from its initial submittal in 1999
to the present:
April 1999
June 1999
July 25, 2000
July 4,2001
August 6, 2001
Sept 19,2001
Sept 2001
Request for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone request from
. Business Park (BP) to Community Business (BC) was received on behalf of
Parcel Numbers 202104-9070 (Campus Gateway Associates), 202104-9001
(Merlino), and 202104-9051 (Wright).
The three requests were presented to the City's Land Useffransportation
Committee (LUTC), which made a recommendation to the full council that
these requests should be analyzed further and all parcels then zoned BP in this
vicinity (parcels 1-9 as shown Table I) should be included. The Council
concurred with the LUTC's request. -
As part of the 2001 Comprehensive Plan Update, owners of Parcels 202104-
9070. (Campus Gateway Associates), 202104-9001 (Merlino), and 202104-9072
(Chase NW Trust) requested that their original request be amended to allow
Multi-FallÚly (RM 2400) uses west of the on-site wetlands (Exhibit 4).
Threshold Determination on the 2001 Comprehensive Plan Update, which
included the Kitts Comer request, was issued pursuant to the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) (Exhibit 5).
Applicants withdrew request for a Multi-Family comprehensive plan
designation and RM 2400 zoning on west side.
Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the
request for a change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning from BP to
BC for the areas east of the wetlands based on a development agreement, which
would be entered into between the City and the property owners.
. On a separate track, as part of the 2002 Comprehensive Plan Update, Dick
Borsini subllÚtted a request on behalf of the owners of Parcels 202104-9070
(Campus Gateway Associ~tes), 202104-9001 (Merlino), and 202104-9072
(Chase NW Trust) for a change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning of
approximately 13.35 acres located west of the on-site wetlands from BP to Multi-
Family Residential and RM 2400 (one unit per 2,400 square feet) (Exhibit 6).
October 1,2001 Five of the eight site-specific requests for the 2001 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Process were presented to the LUTC (Request #3, Jackson had
been withdr~wn). At that time staff infonned the LUTC that Requests #4 (Kitts
Comer) ànd #6 (Christian Faith Center) would be . presented to the LUTC and
Land Use!rransportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update, Kitts Comer Request
Meeting of May 2, 2005
Page 3
City Council at a later date in order to allow staff to prepare development
agreements related to these requests.
Nov 5, 2001
Draft development agreements on Christian Faith Center and Kitts Corner were
presented to the LUTC to get direction on whether the draft development
agreements addressed all identified concerns associated with a change in the
comprehensive plan designation and zoning from BP to RM3600 for Christian
Faith Center and from BPto Be for Kitts Corner. The LUTe gave direction to
staff to continue work on the agreements as presented.
March 27,2003
Per Ordinance No. 03-442, the City of Federal Way adopted a comprehensive
plan designation and zoning of Multi-Family Residential and RM 2400 (one
unit per2,400 square feet) based on future approval of a development
agreement and development plan for those portions of Parcels 202104-9070,
202104-9001, and 202104-9072, located west of the on-site wetlands.
Sept3,2004
Applicant submitted application for approval of development agreement and
development plan for both the east and west side of the wetlands. Total site area
consists of 46; 12 acres.
March 16,2005 City infonned Jon Potter that they were initiating a legislative comprehensive
plan amendment and conditional rezone for the Kitts Corner site (Exhibit 7).
IV.
REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Since November 5, 2001, staffhas been working with the applicants on a development plan that
meets the direction 'given to staff during the November 5, 2001, LUTC meeting and in subsequent
briefings. However, Mr. Potter has been unable to obtain the signatures of the owners of Parcels
202104-9080 (Ralph Jones) and 202104-9086 (CCO Enterprises Inc.). Going forward with the
proposal with the exclusion of these parcels would result in an island ofBP zoning surrounded by
BC (Exhibit 8). In a March 16, 2005 correspondence, the City notified Mr. Potter that they were
initiating a legislative comprehensive plan amendment and conditional rezone (Exhibit 7). This
would allow the request to go forward as a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone based on
specific conditions, which would achieve the same result as a development agreement.
In March 27, 2003, the western portion of the site was given a comprehensive plan amendment
and zoning of Multifamily (RM 2400), per Ordinance No. 03-442, based on a future development
agreement for the entire site. Since the request is no longer being reviewed subject to a
development agreement, which was intended to apply to the entire site, the western portion of the
site must also be reviewed along with the eastern portion of the site pursuant to a legislative
comprehensive plan amendment and conditional rezone.
v.
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEP A) PROCESS
As shown in Section III above, History, the Kitts Comer comprehensive plan amendment and
rezone was first submitted in 1999 and was considered as part of the 2001 Comprehensive Plan
Amendments based on the conceptual site plan shown as Exhibit 9. A Determination of
Land UsefTransportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update, Kitts Comer Request
Meeting of May 2,2005
Page 4
Nonsignificance (DNS) (Exhibit 5) for the non-project action to change the designation of
approximately 45.85 acres located south of South 336tb Street and west of Pacific Highway from
. BP to BC and RM 2400 was issued on July 4,2001. This action was part of the 2001 CitY of
Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Amendments! The 14-day comment period ended on July 18,
2001,and the 14- day appeal period ended on August 1,2001. No appeals were received.
Although this was a non-project action, a conceptual site plan (Exhibit 9) was used to analyze
potential impacts. Subsequent to the November S, 2001, LUTe's direction to prepare a
development plan and after working with City staff, the applicant submitted a development plan
on September 3,2004 (Exhibit 3). As shown iriExhibit 3, the 2001 conceptual site plan (Exhibit 9)
has been modified in terms of the total number of acres, the number of acres to be designated
multi-family versus commercial, and the proposed uses.
Pursuant to WAC 197-11-600(3)(b)(i), an addendum (Exhibit 10) has been prepared to analyze
whether potential impacts associated with the changed action is likely to have significant ,adverse
impacts. The addendum analyzed the proposed action to change the comprehensive plan
designation and zoning, and potential impacts associated with a development pattern that may
result from these changes, based on the 2004 conceptual plan (Exhibit 3) as compared to the 2001
conceptual plan (Exhibit 9). This comparison identified no new or different environmental impacts
beyond those evaluated in the July 4,2001, Determination of Non significance.
'VI.
PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
2/19/05 Issuance of SEP A Addendum
5/2/05
Presentation to LUTCon Kitts Comer
5/17/05 City Council Public Meeting
6/7/05
Second City Council Pu:blic Meeting and Adoption of Ordinance
VII.
PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED
Throughout the review of the Kitts Comer request, the City has received comments from two
businesses:
1. Comments from Washington Trucking Association - The Washington Trucking Association
submitted a July 15, 2002, letter (Exhibit 11) stating concerns about changing the
comprehensive plan amendment and zoning of the western portion of the site from BP to
RM 2400 due to increased traffic.
2. Frito Lay Comments - Frito Lay submitted two letters (Exhibits 12 and 13) dated August
15,2001, and September 2,2004, in opposition to the Kitts Corner comprehensive plan
amendment and rezone. They are opposed to residential uses being located adjacent to their
manufacturing business.
Land Useffransportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update, Kitts Comer Request
Meeting of May 2, 2005
Page 5
VIII.
NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS AND AVAILABILITY OF SERVICES
N eighborhooØ- Characteristics
The site. is presently vacant except for Parcel 202014-9086 (CCD Enterprises Inc.), on which
Horan Realty, a real estate office building is located, and Parcel 202104-9090 (Nelson), on which
an automotive business is operated. In addition, a City-controlled regional detention pond, Kitts
Corner,is located on the western portion of Parcel 202104-9004 (Slisco). Uses to the north across
South 336th Street are a mix of retail, office, church, and restaurants. To the south is vacant land on
which a mini-storage is being proposed. To the east across Pacific Highway South, moving from
north to south, are small retail establishments, vacant property, bank under construction, Pacifica
Park Office Building, and Canopy World. In addition, Walt's Automotive is located on the
triangular piece of property between Pacific Highway South and 16th Avenue South. To the west,
moving from north to south, are Mitchell House, a senior housing development, and industrial
uses, including Frito Lay.
Availability of Utilities
Sanitary Sewer:
Located within the Lakehaven Utility District. Sewer facilities will need to be
extended to serve the site. There is adequate sewer capacity àt this time.
Public Water:
Located within the Lakehaven Utility District. Water facilities will need to be
'extended to serve the site. There is adequate water capacity at this time.
Storm Drainage: Site is located in the West Hylebos Creek Sub-Basin
A vallability of Public. Services
Police:
Provided by CityofFederal Way
Fire! Emergency
Medical: Provided by Federal Way Fire Department
Schools:
Provided by Federal Way School District,
IX.
PROPOSED USES AS SHOWN IN 2004 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
The uses listed in Table II are based on information shown on the submitted development plan
(Exhibit 3). Any future development must comply with the conditions of approval as listed in
Section XV of this staff report.
TABLE II
Use
Office Space
Square
Foota e
40,000
139 000
# Employees Based on Accepted
use to Em 10 ee Ratio
160 employees (one employee!
250 s . ft
278 e 10 ees one e
# Residential Units
Land Use/rransportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update, Kitts Comer Request
Meeting of May 2,2005
, Page 6
Use
# Residential Units
'Center S ace
Total
179,000
438 employees
160 residential townhouses (132
townhouses on the west side of the
on~site wetlands and 28 on the east
side of the on-site wetlands
x.
SENSITIVE AREAS
A Class IT Wetland is located on the west central portions of Parcel 202104-9070 (Campus
Gateway) and Parce1202104~9001 (Merlino), and on the northern portIon of Parcel 202104-9072
(Chase NW Trust). A City-controlled regional detention pond, Kitts Corner, is located on the
western portion of Parcel 202104-9004 (Slisco). A smaller Class II wetland is located to the south
on Parcel 202104-9004 (Slisco). This smaller wetland is presently utilized as the overflow
detention area for the primary Kitts Comer detention area to the southwest. A branch of the
Hylebos Stream flows southwards through these wetlands. Class IT Wetlands have 100-foot
setbacks. The on-site stream also has a 100wfoot buffer. The stream buffer is either contained
within the existing wetland buffets or flows through the regional detention pond. Parcels 202104-
9070 (Campus Gateway) and 2021O4~9001 (Merlino) are further affected by the buffer ofa Class
II Wetland to the west. There are also two smaller wetlands located on the Campus Gateway and
Merlino parcels. The City entered into a June 17, 1996, Settlement Agreement and Covenant with
the property owners which stated that once all pennit fees were paid and the development
application was in compliance with all applicable laws and codes, these smaller parcels could be
filled because mitigation for their filling was already built into the mitigation plan for the overall
project. If future development is proposed in the vicinity of an on-site stream or wetland,
compliance with Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Article XIV, "Environmentally
Sensitive Areas," and the settlement agreement and covenant will be required. .
XI.
DRAINAGE
The site is located in the West HyIebos Creek Sub-Basin. Since more than 5,000 square feet of
impervious surfaces would be created with development of the site, surface water runoff and
treatment would be required per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual
(KCSWDM), the Federal Way Addendum to the KCSWD, and any conditions stipulated in the
settlement agreement and covenant entered into between the City and the property owners, The
site falls within a Levell Flow Control Area, thus the applicant must design the flow control
facility to meet these performance criteria.
XII.
ACCESS
Proposed access to the' eastern (area east of the large onwsite wetland) portion oftlu; site is from
South 336th Street, a principal arterial located to the north of the site, and Pacific Highway South,
also a principal arterial located to the east. Access to the western portion of the site would be from
South 336th Street. The conceptual plan (Exhibit 3) shows a road connecting the western (area west
of the large oil-site wetlands) and eastern (area east of the large on-site wetland) areas. This
Land Useffransportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update, Kitts Comer Request
Meeting of May 2,2005
. Page 7
connecting roadway would provide the western portion ofthe site access to Pacific Highway South.
Based on the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), the planned road section for Pacific.
Highway South is a Type A street (four lanes plus High Occupancy Vehicle lanes), consisting of a
90-foot street with curb, gutter, six-foot planting strip with street trees, eight-foot sidewalk, and
streetlights in a 1 24-foot right-of-way. In 2004, the City constructed two northbound left-turn lanes
at 336th Street, increasing the street and right-of-way by 12 feet. The planned road section for
South 336th Street is a Type E Street consisting of a 64-foot wide street (four lanes plus median)
with curb, gutter, six-foot planting strip with street trees, eight-foot sidewalk, and streetlights in a
98~foot right-of-way. In addition, the Capital ImprovementPIant (CIP) anticipates the need for a
second eastbound left-turn lane and an additional eastbound through lane at Pacific Highway
South, increasing the planne.d width of street and right-of-way by 24 feet.
th .
As part of the development of the site, 13 Place South would be extended southward from South
33óth Street through the site, and South 340th would be extended westward from Pacific Highway
South through the site. An additional east/west access would also be required between South 33óth
and South 340th Streets.
XIII.
POTENTIAL TRAFFIC IMPACTS
Based on the requested comprehensive plan designation of Community Business and Multifamily,
and zoning ofBC and RM 2400 (one unit per 2,400 square feet), and the uses as shown in Table
IT, evening peak hour trips are estimated at 742 trips. Development of the site would require the
preparation of a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) by the applicant's engineer. The TIA would
identify transportation impacts associated with the development and identify appropriate
mitigation measures. The applicants would be expected to construct impacted TIP projects or
contribute pro-rata shares towards projects on the TIP that are impacted by more than ten peak
hour trips. Additionally, on-site and off~sìte transportation-related improvements may be required
as detennined by the TIA.
XIV.
PROJECTIONS FOR POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT
The site is presently vacant except for Parcel 202014-9086 (CCO Enterprises Inc.), on which.
Horan Realty, a real estate office building,Ïs located, and Parcel 202104-9090 (Nelson), on which
an automotive business is operated. The existing BP zoning allows both office use on small lots .
. and automotive repair. On the other hand, BC zoning allows office use but does not allow
. automotive repair as a principal use. Therefore, the existing automotive business on Parcel
202014-9086 would become nonconfonning with BC zoning. The uses shown in the 2004
conceptual site plan would result in 438 jobs and 160 residential units.
The overall vision of the comprehensive plan is to restrict commercial development to the
downtown (City Center Core and Frame), to Pacific Highway South (generally between South
272nd Street and South 348th Street), and to the area aroWld South 348th Street, approximately
between SR~99 and 1-5. The vision of the comprehensive plan is also.1o provide an appropriate
balance of services, employment, and housing. In addition, the land use concept envisions
promotion of housing in the City's commercial areas close to shopping and employment.
Land UselTransportation ColTIfÒittee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update, Kitts Comer Request
Meeting of May 2,2005
Page 8
xv.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the r~quest from Jon Potter to change the comprehensive plan designation
and zoning of approximately 46 acres located south of South 336th Street and west of Pacific '
Highway South from Business Park (BP) to Community Business (BC) and MùIti-Family (RM
2400) be approved based on the following conditions:
Prior to construction of any new buildings,3, a single Master Plan for the entire Multi-Family
(RM 2400) and Community Business (BC) zoned site shall be submitted to and approved by
the City. Application for critical area intrusions as applicable is also required in conjunction
with master plan review. A project action State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) review
shall also be conducted in conjunction with master plan and critical area review. Subsequent
, to Master Plan approval, building design and minor modifications to the site plan shall be
reviewed via a Process ll, Site Plan Review. For the purposes of the Master Plan, the subject
site is comprised of the following parcels: 202104-9069,202104-9070,202104-9001,
202104-9090,202104-9086,202104-9080,202104-9072, and 202104-9004.
1.
2.
The Master Plan shall be developed with a cohesive and integrated design that promotes the
following:
a.
Pedestrian scale, and pedestrian oriehtation and massing of buildings.
b.
Site~wide pedestrian connectivity.
c.
Building massing shall be designed to avoid large expanses of parking areas adjacent to
and/or visible from the public right-of-ways. On-site parking shall not be allowed
between buildings and public right-of~ways, except the Director of Community
Development Services may approve one double.Ioaded parking row between a building
and right-of-way due to extenuating circumstances.
d.
The appearance of strip commercial development shall be minimized by breaking large
linear buildings into numerous smaller buildings. '
e.
The commercial portion of the site may include a maximum of two primary anchor
buildings. The individual anchor buildings are permitted a maximum 50,000 square feet
of building footprint, and the total gross floor area of all anchors shall not exceed
100,000 square feet of gross floor area. Anchor facades shall not exceed a width to
depth ratio of 1.5:1. '
f.
Non-anchor buildings should not exceed 10,000 square feet of building footprint. The
Director of Community Development Services may approve a maximum of two, non-
'anchor buildings in excess of 10,OOO square feet, up to a maximum of 20,000 square
feet each, when the applicant demonstrates the following: '
3 There are two existing building on the site, the Horan building and the building housing the automotive repair business to the
west of Horan.
Land Userrransportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update, Kitts Comer Request
Meeting of May 2,2005
Page 9
3.
(i) The additional square footage is necessary to accommodate the needs of a specific
tenant.
(ii) The facades of the structure include significant structural modulation equal to at
least ten percent of the length of the subject façade.
(iii) The overall design of the building is consistent with the pedestrian scale and
integrated design of the overall site. ,
(iv) Non-anchor facades shall not exceed a width to depth ratio of2:1.
g.
Primary commercial building entries shall be clearly visible and recognizable from the
public right-of-ways; or active building facades, including windows and pedestrian scale
design amenities such as screening, plazas, or art'features such as trellises, artwork,
murals, landscaping or combinations thereof, shall be required fronting the right-of-way.
h.
On-street parallel parking is encouraged where feasible.
i.
A minimum of five percent of the gross land area of the commercial portion of the site
shall be pedestrián oriented open space. There shall be one primary pedestrian gathering
focal point, and additional supporting pedestrian oriented gathering locations distributed
proportionally throughout the commercial portion of the site. Open space areas and
plazas shall include seating, landscaping, art, ornamentation, pedestrian scale lighting,
water features, and outdoor dining.
j.
Vehicular service stations are not pennitted. Fuel pump stations are only permitted when
accessory to an anchor tenant. Any approved fuel pump station shall not be oriented to
the public right-of-way, and shall not exceed two fuel islands with a total of up to eight
vehicular fueling positions.
Development of the site shall include design, construction, and dedication of the following
'public roadways in accordance with appropriate FWCC street sections:
(a) 13th Place from South 336th Street to the south property line;
(b) South 340th Street from Pacific Highway South to the intersection of 13th Place South
extended; ,
(c) A roadway connecting from South 336th Street through the residential area, connecting
to 13 th Place South extended.
These public roadways are necessary to serve the proposed development and shall be
constructed as outlined below. Additional conditions (on-site andoff-site) intended to mitigate
significant adverse envirorunental impacts shall be imposed through the City's SErA process and
will be applied to any specific proposed project in the future.
a.
Prior to occupancy of any residential building on the site, South 340th Street from
Pacific Highway South to the intersection of 13th Place South extended, and the
roadway within the residential area connecting to South 336th Street, shall be
constructed to meet all applicable standards. Traffic calming devices such as speed
humps, speed tables, traffic circles, cmcanes, curb extensions, signs, pavement markings, or
other calming devices as approved by the Public Works Director shall be incorporated
within the residential roadway. Signal modifications at Pacific Highway South and South
340th Street intersection may be required to provide safe access.
Meeting of May 2,2005
Page 10
Land UsefI'ransportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plari Update, Kitts Comer Request
XVI.
Alternatively, the developer may construct the extension of l31b. Place South fÌ'om South
3361b. Street to its intersection with the proposed residential road as a traffic circle. This
would elinùnate the need for the construction of South 340111 Street from Pacific Highway
South to the intersection of 131b. Place South extended, and the segment of 131b. Place South
between South 3401b. Street and the' intersection of the residential roadway (traffic circle).
b.
Prior to occupancy of any commercial building, 13th Place South fÌ'om South 336111
Street to the south property line, and South 340111 Street from Pacific Highway South to
the intersection of 13111 Avenue South extended, shall be constructed to all applicable
standards. A new traffic signal (South 336111 Street & l3tb Place South) and/or signal
modifications (pacific Highway South & South 340111 Street) may be required as
determined through the SEP A process.
4.
All new public streets shall include traffic calming features.
5.
Uses other than multi-unit housing and day care facilities that are otherwise permitted in the
RM zone are not allowed.
6.
The muIti-fanùIy portion of the site, west of the large on-site wetland, shall be accessed from
one location along South 336111 Street and shall include a public roadway connecting through
the residential area, across the existing wetland berm, and connecting to 13 th A venue South'
extended.
7.
No more than one anchor building, or a maximum of 75,000 square feet of commercial
building area, may receive a Certificate of Occupancy on the site without the prior
construction of a minimum of 75 residential units.
8.
The residential area shall be designed to minimize reception of potential noise impacts from
adjacent nonresidential uses.
LAND USEJ'fRANSPORT A TION COMMITTEE OPTIONS
The Committee has the following options:
1. LRecommend that the full Council accept the staff recommendation and adopt an
ordinance approving the request by Jon Potter for a change in comprehensive rlan
designation and zoning of approximately 46 acres located south of South 3361 Street and
west of Pacific Highway South from Business Park (BP) to Community Business (Be) and
Multi-Family (RM 2400).
2
Recommend that the full Council modify the staff recommendation and adopt an
ordinance approving the request.
3.
Recommend that the full Council disapprove the request by resolution, retaining the
Business Park (BP) comprehensive plan designation and zoning. -
Land Userrransportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update, Kitts Comer Request
Meeting of May 2,2005
Page II
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit I
Exhibit 2
Exhibit 3
Exhibit 4
Exhibit 5
Exhibit 6
Exhibit 7
Exhibit 8
Exhibit 9
Exhibit 10
Exhibit II
Exhibit 12
Exhibit 13
Zoning Map showing existing and requ.estedzoning
Conceptual site plan showing the Kitts Comer Request to change the comprehensive plan designation
and zoning of approximately 46 acres located south of South 336111 Street and west of Pacific Highway
South from Business Park (BP) to Conununity Business (Be) and Multi-Fattùly (RM 2400) (2004
Compreh~nsive Plan Update)
Map showing conceptual development subttùtted as part of the 2004 development agreement
application
Kitts Comer Request, 200 I Comprehensive Plan Amendments -
July 4, 200 I, Determination ofNonsignificance (DNS)
Kitts Corner Request, 2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March 16, 2005 Correspondence from Jim Harris, Senior Planner to Jon Potter
Map portraying zoning without including Parcels 202104-9080 (Ralph Jones) and 202104-9086 (CCD
Enterprises Inc.) -
Conceptual Site Plan showing Kilts Corner Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and
zoning of approximately 46 acres .located south of South 326m Street and west of Pacific Highway
South from Business Park (BP) to ConnnllllÎty Business (Be) and Multi-Fattùly (RM 2400) (200 I
ComPrehensive Plan Update)
DNS Addendum for Kitts Corner Request
July 15,2002, Lettertfom the Washington Trucking Association
August 15, 2001, Letter from Frito Lay
September 2, 2004, Letter from Frito Lay
1:\2004 Comprehensive Plan\2004 Upda(e\LUTC\041805 Staff Report to the LUTc.docI4I261200S 9:54 AM
Land Useffransportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update, Kitts Comer Request
Meeting of May 2,2005
. Page 12
'0
':;.:
.:z::
t;
'(tp' "
CII
~i
::
~
S 336TH ST
p
0
~
..
.
Mitchell .
Place.
Apartment(
..
.
..
-
,i '/
."~~
l..i.1 Existing Designation:
Comprehensive Plan:
Business Park
Zonina: BP
BP
"-
.
'OP"
OP
Requested Designation:
Comprehensive Plan:
Community Business and
Multifamily Residential
Zonina; BC and RM2400
.",
'1 ;F
m
CII
'"
II.
j!;
::!
OP
Request BOtIñdary "'"
..
S 335TH ST
.
IBP
,.202104. "
9069,
CI)
:,,1 ~
',' 2:
(.)
¡¡:
~
Q;
BP J'ti
'" . ~
b-
~
CII
:;.:
~
BP
BC
¡¡¡¡¡¡;
, BC
"
BP
BP "
oJ'
SP
. .,~..
BC
IC
,
BC
1 City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan
2004
Site Specific Requests" !
For Comprehensive Plan
Designation Changes
Kitts Corner
Site Specific Request
Legend
D Site Specific Request
- Steep Slopes
1"::.o,T{~t Wetlands
B
EXHIBIT "
PAGE LOF J
tJ. 0 250 500
N I J Feet
I
This map is intended for use as a graphicsl
representation only. The City of Federal Way
makes no wananty as to its accuracy.
EXHIBIT ~
PAGE ,. OF I
C",-'"",":,"
;,' ",'
, "",,:,,:'
",..,..",
""",..,'"",;',.':"'"""":';',",,,,,
,"'- ",' .. "". .'"
""000I<0Io
UOld a~!s lon~d.."uo:) ,! ilill. ~
~ t ~j~ ~~ I ,
. )!" _u.
.'¡ ij J~I f j
luG Md!^GlI ~ I
! ; ~~ ;¡
~ ~ (0-
~ ~¡;; ~ !
I~ '="
i .~ ~ ~
j ¡~ ~ ~~ § ~
~~ ; ?il
~¡¡¡¡ a~ I!~
§'"'" II!! ~5~~ :¡:w
~~ !õ"~¡¡ iil! ili ><~
I ill Wa..
!; ~ I!! II .~ ~
p
~ II
FAO,",'(; H'GHWAY SOUTH
l
I
~~¡l!~J-
¡!~:!15.:
.
.
><-- .' '~"""""" .,'
MEETING DATE:
May 17, 2005
ITEM#
~ -{6.-j
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Puget Center Partnership
"-""'-~-----"'"'""""" ..."..."-----~,-,"-","",,," ",... """'-,--~--"""""""'" """""-'-'----'--"'--"""-'-"""-"---------- ------~----"--,-_.._~-------"--,-,-""
CATEGORY:
D CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
t81 ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
BUDGET IMP ACT:
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
-,-"",,___m_m___m__m- ""' "'"" ..."......",..,---------"'-"'-,..,,---------,~"-,- -".",..._"
_____m_____.._"-----"---""-----"",,,-"-----,,
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Draft Adoption Ordinance with Exhibits A andB; 2) March 30, 2005, Memorandum to the Land
Userrransportation Committee (LUTe) with Exhibits 1, 4* and 5 - 9; 3) Apri125, 2005, Memorandum to the Land
Useffransportation Committee (LUTC) with Exhibits 1 and 2. *(Please note that due to its bulk, Exhibit B of 4 {Housing Chapter
Amendments presented to the Planning Commission] is not Included in the City Council packet, but is available in the City Council Conference
Room).
---"""""""""""""'---------".""".._"_.- "-""--'_.""'-""'--' "------"-'--""--'--"""--""-"""""""'-'-'-"""""""""-'.._-""."",."""_.""""..."..""",,..
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Federal Way adopted its Comprehensive Plan in November of 1995, and amended the plan in
December of 1998, September 2000, November 2001, March 2003, and July 2004. Pursuant to RCW 36. 70A.130, the Growth
Management Act (GMA) limits plan updates to no more than once per year, except under certain circumstances. The 2004
Comprehensive Plan amendments include three separate actions: proposed amendments to Chapter 5, "Housing" of the Federal
Way Comprehensive Plan; a request by Jon Potter for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone for Kitts Corner; and a request
by the Puget Center Partnership for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone. The three actipns are being considered on
separate agenda bills with separate ordinances, but will be acted upon simultaneously to amend the comprehensive plan in order to -
comply with RCW36.70A.130. The Planning CO1runission held a public hearing on the PugetCenterPartnership réq1.iéstonMatch ,-,
23,2005, after which it recommended approval of the comprehensive plan amendment and rezone from Professional Office (PO)to..
Neighborhood (BN), based on a five to one (5-1) vote on condition that a deed restriction be placed on the property." '
--"'"""-",,..._... """""...""...",, """""""""""""""'-""--------~"'-"-"'--"""""""'--""'---------------...-----..."...-......... """""-...-"...""...,,,,,,",,,,",,-......- "'" ._" "-"""-,,,--,----_.,,._-,---,,--
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LUTC discussed the Planning Commission's
recommendation during public meetings on April 18, 2005 and May 2, 2005. At the close of the May 2, 2005 meeting, the LUTC
made a motion to recommend approval of the Puget Center Partnership request to change the comprehensive plan designation and
zoning of 4.03 acres located north of South 31ih Street and east of 1st Avenue South from Professional Office (PO) to
Neighborhood Business (EN), based on a legislative comprehensive plan amendment and conditional rezone with conditions as
outlined in Section 2 of the Draft Adoption Ordinance (pages 4), prohibiting car wash, vehicle service station, vehicle repair, bar,
tavern, cocktail lounge, and group home; requiring buffering of on.site uses from adjacent residential uses; requiring retention of
on-site vegetation to the maximum extent possible; and requiring buildings to be constructed adjacent to the street right-of-way.
~-----_..______m_mm"mm"""..'m__"""'""""""""""""""'-'" "",."""....."..,._._"------~----~---,-_...,-"_._"...",..."..."",,,-,-,, ...,-"'"-"""_..................",, """...""',,",, "".""..."...""""...,, .,"'",._, ---_...,--,....,,---,-~----"
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the ordinance adopting amendments to the comprehensive plan and enactment on
June 7, 2005."
~~~~~~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
..."""-,,---"'-"""""",,._~,...._-_._--
COUNCIL ACTION:
D
0
D
D
APPROVED
DENIED
T ABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION
MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
37/
Revised - 0511 01200 I
1:\2004 Comprehensive Plan\2004 UpdatelCity CouncillPuget Center Partnership CC Cover Agenda.doct05/1Q12005 9:27 AM
DRAFT
~/I () /D S-
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S GROWTH
MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, APPROVING A CHANGE IN
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING OF 4.03 ACRES
LOCATED NORTH OF SOUTH 312TH STREET AND EAST OF 1ST AVENUE
SOUTH FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) TO NEIGHBORHOOD
BUSINESS (BN), BASED ON SPECIFIC CONDITIONS (AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO'S. 90-43, 95-248, 96-270, 98-330, 00437~, Olw405, 034442, 04-
460, 04-461, 04-462).
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act of 1990, as amended, (Chapter 36.70A RCW or "GMA")
requires the City of Federal Way to adopt a comprehensive plan which includes a land use element (including
a land use map), housing element, capital facilities plan element, utilities element, and transportation element
(including transportation system map[s]); and.
WHEREAS, the GMA also requires the City of Federal Way to adopt development regulations
implementing its comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted its comprehensive plan with land use map (the
"Plan") on November 21, 1995, and adopted development regulations and a zoning map implementing the
Plan on July 2, 1996; and subsequently amended the co;mprehensive plan, land use map, and zoning map on
December 23, 1998, September 14,2000, November 1,2001, March 27,2003, and July 20,2004; and
WHEREAS, the City may consider Plan and development regulation amendments pursuant to Article
IX, Chapter 22 of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC); and
WHEREAS, under RCW 36. 70A.130, the Plan and development regulations are subject to continuing
review and evaluation, but the Plan may be amended no more than one time per year; and
WHEREAS, the Council shall be considering three separate actions to amend the comprehensive plan,
all of which will be acted upon simultaneously in order to comply with RCW 36. 70A.130; and
WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 05--, amendments to Chapter 5, "Housing," of the
Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; and
ORD#
,PAGE I
WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 05-_, approving a change in comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of approximately 46 acres located south of South 336th Street and west of Pacific
Highway South from Business Park (BP) to Community Business (Be) and Multi-Family (RM 2400), based
on specific conditions as contained in Ordinance No. 05-_; and
WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 05-_, approving a change in comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of South 3 12th Street and east of 1 st Avenue South from
Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN), based on specific conditions as contained in
Section 2 below; and
WHEREAS, in September 2003, the City of Federal Way accepted a request from Paul Benton on
behalf ofthe Puget Center Partnership to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres
located north of South 312th Street and east of 1st Avenue South from Professional Office (PO) to
Neighborhood Business (BN); and
WHEREAS, in February 2005, the City's SEP A Responsible Official issued a Detennination of
Nonsignificance on the 2004 comprehensive plan amendments, which included the Puget Center Partnership
. request; and
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way, through its staff, Planning Commission, City Council
corrnnittees, and full City Council has received, discussed, and considered the testimony, written comments,
and material from the public, as follows:
1. The City's Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Puget Center Partnership request
on March 23,2005, after which it recommended approval of the comprehensive plan amendment
and rezone from Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN), based on a five to one
(5-1) vote on condition that a deed restriction be placed on the property;
2. The Land Use/Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered the request
on April 18,2005 and May 2,2005, following which it-recommended approval of the request
based on the conditions of approval in Section 2 below; and
ORD#
, PAGE 2
3. The full City Council considered the matter at its meetings on May 17,2005, and June 7, 2005;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to approve the change in comprehensive plan designation and
zoning of 4.03 our acres located north of South 31Zth Street and east of 151 Avenue South from Professional
Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN), based on specific conditions as contained in Section 2 below.
Now, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, does hereby ordain as
follows:
. Section I. Findinl!s.
A. The proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan map, as set forth in Exhibit A attached
hereto, to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of South 3121h
Street and east of 151 Avenue South from Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN), based on
conditions of approval set forth in Section 2 below, will allow development which is compatible with the
surrounding neighborhood, including adjacent single-family uses, provide convenient goods and services at a
pedestrian and neighborhood scale close to adjacent residential uses, and provide for transportation facilities to
serve the site, and therefore bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; is in the best
interest of the residents of the City; and is consistent with the requirements ofRCW 36.70A, the King County
Countywide Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the Plan.
B. The proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan map, as set forth in Exhibit A attached
hereto, is compatible with adjacent land uses and will not negatively affect open space, streams, lakes, or
wetlands, or the physical environment in general. The amendment will allow for growth and development
consistent with the Plan's overall vision andwith the Plan's land use element household and job projections,
and will allow reasonable use of property subject to constraints necessary to protect environmentally sensitive
areas. The amendment, therefore, bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; is in the
best interest of the residents of the City; and is consistent with the requirements ofRCW 36.70A, the King
County Countywide Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the Plan.
ORD#
, PAGE 3
C. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map, set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto, is consistent
with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan and the comprehensive plan land use map proposed
to be amended in Section 3 below, bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, and welfare, and is in the
best interest of the residents of the City.
Section 2. Conditions of Aooroval.
1.
The follòwing uses shall be prohibited:
Car wash
Vehicle service station
Vehicle repair
Bar, tavern, or cocktail lounge.
Group home
2.
The approved site plan for any allowable development on the site shall meet the following
requirements:
a. Landscaping shall be provided along the northern and eastern property lines to
adequately buffer on~site uses from adjacent residential uses and at the minimum must comply
with FWCC Section 22-1566.
b. Existing vegetation must be retained to the maximum extent possible as demonstrated
on a tree retention plan meeting the requirements of FWCC Section 22-1568.
c. To the maximum extent possible, buildings shall be constructed adjacent to the street
right-of-way with parking located behind the buildings.
Section 3.
Comorehensive Plan Amendments Adoption.
The 1995 City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter amended in 1998,2000,2001,2003, and 2004, copies of which are on file
with the Office of the City Clerk, hereby are and shall be amended as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto.
Section 4. Amendment Authority. The adoption of Plan amendments in Section 3 above is pursuant
to the authority granted by Chapters 36.70A and 35A.63 RCW, and pursuant to FWCC Section 22-541.
Section 5. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The
invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the
invalidity of the application thereofto any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder
ORD#
, PAGE 4
of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 6. Savings Clause. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter
amended in 1998,2000,2001,2003, and 2004 shall remain in force and effect until the amendments thereto
become operative upon the effective date of this ordinance.
Section 7. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this
ordinance is hereby ratified and affinned.
Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and
after its passage, approval, and publication, as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this
,2005.
day of
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Mayor, Dean McColgan
A TrEST:
City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC
ApPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson
FILED WIlli 1HE CITY CLERK:
. PASSED BY 1HE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE No:
1:\2004 Comprehensive Plan\2004 Update\CityCouncil\Puget Center Partnership Adoption Ordinance.doc/SIIOt2005 9:38 AM
ORD#
,PAGE 5
EXHIBIT A
TO
, ADOPTION ORDINANCE
-,
, .. - - - ------- ------..------ ,- --..-,
- ,----, ---_.._,-
-'-'-'-"
,.. -.-, ----- --
...-
I1eiUJIb or-bond
8Idn-esš.
Ø1IUJ f9.0'1i
.1/fIdrñUP f«fï¡
V'$j?qftlllltcc.
tj'NeÎg~
&-rín~
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan
2004 Site
. Specific Request
Puget Center
Partnership
Legend
D Comprehensive Plan
~ Wetlands (1998 City Survey)
*Comprehensive Plan
Amendment from
Professional Office to
Neighborhood Commercial
subject to conditions.
Approved per Ordinance
No.
~
N
0 125 250
, 'Feet
A Fëderal Way
This map is accompanied by no warranties
and is simply a graphic representation.
EXHIBIT B
TO
. ADOPTIO.N ORDINANCE
, """ .
run_In m
~ ~ 811_-
.1.
.
...
City of Federal Way
Zoning
2004 Site
Specific Request:
Puget Center
Partnership
Legend
D Zoning
~. Wetlands (1998 City Survey)
*Rezone from
PO to aN
subject to conditions.
Approved per. Ordinance
No. .
6
N
0
125
250
, Feet
A Fëderal Way
This map is accompanied by no warranties
and is simply a graphic representation.
~\j.lum
!
I JIII18
.1.
City of Federal Way
Zoning
2004 Site
Specific Request:
Puget Center
Partnership
Legend
D Zoning
~. Wetlands (1998 City Survey)
*Rezone from
PO to aN
subject to conditions.
Approved per Ordinance
No. -
~
N
0
125
250
1 Feet
A Fëderal Way
This map is accompanied by no warranties
and is simply a graphic representation.
MARCH 30, 2005
MEMORANDUM
TO
THE LAND USE/TRANSPORTATIO.N.
COMMITTEE
(Please note that due to its bulk, Exhibit B
of 4 [Housing Chapter Amendments
presented to the Planning Commission] is
not included in the City Council packet,
but is available in the City Council
Conference Room).
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
March 30, 2005
VIA:
Jack Dovey, Chair
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTe)
David M~ger
Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services ~
Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner .~
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
MEETING DATE: April 18, 2005
I.
BACKGROUND
The 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments includes the following three components:
1. Puget Center Partnership Request - Request from the Puget Center Partnership to
change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of
South 3 12th Street and east of 1 sl Avenue South from Professional Office (PO) to
Neighborhood Business (BN) (Exhibit 1).
2. Housing Chapter Update - Update of "Chapter 5, Housing,.' of the Federa/Way
Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) (Exhibit 2).
3. Kitts Comer Request - Request from Jon Potter to change the comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of approximately 46 acres from Business Park (BP) to
Community Business (Be) and Multi-Family (RM 2400) (Exhibit 3). (This request
will be presented to the LUTC on May 2,2005, and a staff report will be provided to
you approximately one week prior to the meeting.)
Attached are the following:
1. Exhibit 4 - March 15,2005, Staff Report to Planning Comnñssion with Exhibits A-F
.2. Exhibit 5 - March 23,2005, Planning Comnñssion Minutes
II. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
2/19/05 Issuance of Detenmnation of Nonsignificance pursuant to the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA)
LandlUse Transportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
3/07/05 End of SEP A Comment Period
3121/05 . End of SEP A Appeal Period
3/23/05 Public Hearing before the Planning Commission
4/18/05 Presentation to LUTC on Puget Center Partnership Request and Chapter5, Housing
5/2/05
Presentation to LUTC on Kitts Comer
5/17/05 City Council Public Meeting
617/05
Second City Council Public Mee~ng and Adoption of Ordinance
III. SITE~SPECIFIC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE
1.
Background -
In September 2003, the City received one site-specific request for a comprehensive plan
amendment and rezone. Paul Benton, on behalf of the Puget Center Partnership, submitted a
request to amend the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of
South 312th Street and east of I $1 A venue South from Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood
Business (EN) (Exhibit J). .
2.
Summary -
File Number:
Parcel No's: .
Location:
Size:
Applicant:
Owner:
Request:
Existing
Comprehensive Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Requested
Comprehensive Plan:
Requested Zoning:
00-104926-00 UP
082104-9074,082104-9076 & 082104-9167
North of South 312th Street and east of 1 $t A venue South (Exhibit 6)
4.03 acres .
Paul Benton on behalf of Puget Center Partnership
Same.
Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning from
Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN)
Professional Office
Professional Office (PO)
Neighborhood Business
Neighborhood Business (BN)
3.
Public Comments Received Prior to Planning Commission Public Hearing-
a)
Telephone call from Della Giesler, the property owner at 140 South 31i". Ms. Giesler was
interested in obtaining more information about the request.
b)
March 2, 2005, email from Greg Fewins, Deputy Director of Community Development
Services, concerning telephone call from Roddy Nolton (Exhibit 7).
Land/Use Transportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
March 30, 2005
Page 2
c)
March 4,2005, letter from Robert Roper, President, Mirror Lake Residents' Association
(Exhibit 8). .
4.
Staff Recommendation -
Staff recommends that the Puget Center Partnership request to change the comprehensive plan
designation and zoning trom Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN) be
granted.
5.
Public Testimony Provided to Planning Commission -
During the Planning Commission public hearing, Bob Roper testified on behalf of the Mirror
Lake Residents' Association. He stated that the Association had a number of concerns (Exhibit
8), chief of which was the impact on Mirror Lake's water quality.
6.
Planning Commission Recommendation on Puget CenterPartnership Request-
During the Planning Commission hearing, the owner,Paul Benton, submitted a letter (Exhibit 9)
. to the Planning Commissiön which stated that as a condition of receiving the BN comprehensive
plan designatiönand zoning, he would deed restrict the property from being used as a bar,
tavern, cocktail lounge, adult böokstore, adult video store, or other adult entertainmellt business,
and for the renting, leasing, or selling of any boat, motor vehicle, or trailer. The Planning
Commission recommended approval of the comprehensive plan amendment and rezone from
Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood (BN) based on a five to one (5-1) vote on condition
that the deed restriction was placed on the property (Exhibit 5). As can be seen fiomthe
following table, of the restricted uses proposed by Mr. Benton, only bar, tavern, or cocktail
lounge is allowed if!. the BN zone.
Use Neighborhood Business Professional Office
.
Office use X X
Retail (grocery, produce, drugs, personal care,
books, liquor, hardware, garden, retail nursery
stock, household goods, furnishings, clothing, X
variety, home electJ:onics, sporting goods, works of
art)(40 000 SQ. ft. max)
Bank & related financial service (40,000 sq. ft. X
n1ax)
Retail providing laundry, dry cleaning, beauty! X
barber, video rental, shoe r~pair (40,000 sq. ft. max)
Private lodge or club (10,000 sq.ft. max) X
Art gallery X
.
Restaurant or tavern (7,500 sq. ft. max.) X
Fast food restaurant (5,000 sq. ft.) X
Health Club (25,000 sq. ft. max) X
Retail providing entertairunent, recreational, or X
cultural services & activities (25,000 SQ. ft. max)
Vehicle service station or car wash X
LandlUse Transportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
March 30,2005
Page]
Use Neighborhood Business ProCessional Office
Retail providing vehicle selVice or repair (witlún an X
enclosed buildim!;)
School X X
Day care facility (except Class II home occupation) X X
. Multi-unit (stacked) housing (not on the gfound X
floor) (18 du/acre)
Group home Type III-A2 X
Gr~up home Type II-B) X
Social services transitional housi~g, 4 Type As X
Social services transitional housing, Type B6 X
:
Government facility X X
Public transit shelter X X
Public utility X X
Public park X X
Personal wireless service facility X X
Church X
7.
Land Use/Transportation Committee Options -
The Committee has the following options:
1.
Recommend that the full Council accept the Planning Commission ~s
reconunendation and adopt an ordipance approving the request by the Puget Center
Partnership to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located
north of South 3121h Street and east of l"t Avenue South from Professional Office (PO) to
Neighborhood Business (BN) based on the recording of a deed restriction.
. I Group home type II means housing for juveniles under the jurisdiction of the criminal justice system. Such groups include state-
licensed group care homes or halfway homes for juveniles who provide residence in lieu of sentencing or incarceration, halfway
houses providing residence to juveniles needing correction, or for those selected to participate in state..operated work release and
fre-release programs.
Gro.up homes type II-A: Maximum number of 12 residents including resident staff.
) Group homes type II-B: Thirteen or more residents including residential staff. Maximum number detennined on a case-by<ase basis.
4 Social service transitional housing means facilities other than offices and group homes, operated by a nonprofit social service
agency, licensed as required by the state; providing temporary and transitional housing to individuals on an as-needed basis
including, but not limited to, emergency shelters, homeless shelters, and other such crisis intervention facilities. This classification
indudes domestic violence shelters as defined herein, except that such shelters wherein the total number of residents does. not
exceed the JTlßXimum number allowed under the "family" definition, may be pennitted outright in all residential zones.
S Social service transitional housing Type A: Maximum number of residents to be consistent with the maximum number of
unrelated adults allowed under the zoning definition of family.
6 Social service transitional housing Type B: All social service transitional housing not meeting the definition of "Type A,"
above. Maximum number detennined on a case.by-case basis.
The limitation on the nûmber .of residents in social service transitional housing shall not be applied if it prohibits the City from
making reasonable accommodationstò disabled persons in order to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a
dwelling as required by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, 42 USC 3604(t)(3)(b). .
LandlUse Transportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
March 30, 2005
Page 4
2
Recommend that the full Council modify the Planning Commission's
recommendation and adopt an ordinance approving the request by the Puget Center
Partnership to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located
north of South 312th Street and east of 1st Avenue South from Professional Office (PO) to
Neighborhood Business (BN) with no conditions.
3.
Recommend that the full Council disapprove the request by resolution, retaining the
Professional Office (PO) comprehensive plan designation and zoning.
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 5, HOUSING
1.
2.
. a)
Summary of Amendments-
In addition to new language, existing sections have been reatTanged to improve the functioning
of the chapter. The following summarizes only substantive changes:
a)
Page V-5. The section on Countywide Policies has been moved from page V-3 to page V-5
and revised to more clearly describe the goals of the Countywide Planning Polices relating
to the provision of affordable housing.
b)
Pages V-6 - V.24. 5.2 Federal Way and its Housing - This section has been updated based
on different sources such as the 2000 Census, the April 2004 Office of Financial
Management Population Estimates, Northw~t Multiple Listing, and Dupre + Scott.
c)
Page V-21. The Housing Capacity section has been revised to identify ways of increasing
capacity to meet the City's housing targets.
d)
Page V-22 - V-24. Language has been added to describe how zoning and development
regulations may be amended to encourage additional market housing, and affordable and
special needs housing.
e)
Proposed changes to policies are sununarized in the table on the f<?lIowing page.
f)
Pages V-38 - V39. 5.5 Implementation Actions has been deleted since it is a duplication of
some of the policies. .
Planning Commission Recommendation -
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed changes to the Housing
Chapter with the following two further amendments proposed by staff during the March 23,
2005, meeting (Exhibit 2): ..
Replace the wording of the new HP15 as follows:
Modify ooning 8ad subdiTlision regulatiens to ensure that land is aged effieiefttly, that the
regt:llations reflect 6arœnt safety needs, æd that tl1ey permit and ðae01:lfage OoRstrnotion of
Ii broad range of housing types.
Land/Use Transportation Committee
. 2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
March 30,2005
Page 5
Review zoning. subdivision. and development regulations to ensure that they further
housing policies and do not create unintended barriers. This is of particular importance for
small lot and cottage housing developments. In order to facilitate small lot and cottage
housing developments. it is particularlv important to revise. as necessary. the subdivision
and development regulations that govern their development.
b)
Delete Policy HP21 because it is a duplicate of HP22.
ml Coatiooe to pro'vide iaee~ti"les, such as deß$ity bonuses, far pnniàing a portion of
affordable hol;J.siag ia ne'.... de"lelopmeRts.
HP22 Continue to provide incentives such as density bonuses for multi-family housing.
and expand the types of incentives offered to encourage new developments to include
affordable housing.
3.
Land UselIransportation Committee Options -
The Committee has the following options:
1.
Recommend that the full Council accept the Planning Commission's
recommendation and adopt an ordinance approving the amendments to Chapter 5. Housing~
2.
, Recommend that the full Council modify, then adopt the PlalU1ing Commission's
recommendation by ordinance.
LandlUse Transportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
March 30,2005
Page 6
Increase Diversify Increase Encourage Provide for Address Increase Encourage Improve Delete
Housing Housing Affordable Innovative Special Needs Compatibility Open Space Mixed-Use Wording Policy
Capacity Rousing Housing Housing . Between Diverse in Developments in
Housing Developments Commercial
Areas
Amend Amend Amend Amend Amend new HP38 Add newHP13 Add new Amend new HP18 New Delete
existing existing new HP3 existing HPl9 HP5 existing
HPI HPI HPI Policy HP2
Add new Add new Add new Add new HP39 New Delete
HP14 HP15 HP21 HPl2 existing
HP14.
Include
language in
new HP17
Amend Add new Amend Aménd new HP41 New Delete
newHPl7 HP17 new HP25 HP20 existing
HP15
Add new Amend new HP43 New Delete
HP26 HP24 existing
HP19.
Include
language in
newHP 21.
Amend Delete existing New Delete
. new HP27 HP38 & HP40 HP34 existing
Add language to HP38
new HP45 to
address these
'Policies
Add new New Delete
HP28 HP35 existing
HP40
Amend
new HP32 -
LandIU se Transportati on Comrrrittee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
March 30,2005
Page 7
v.
COUNCIL ACTION
Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22. Article IX. ".Process VI Review:' any
amendments to the comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan designations map. or zoning text must
be approved by the City Council based on a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Per
FWCC Section 22-541, after consideration of the Planning Commission report, and at its discretion
holding its own public hearing, the City Council shall by majority vote of its total. membership take
the following action:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Approve the amendments by ordinance;
Modify and approve the amendments by" ordinance;
Disapprove the amendments by resolution; or
Refer the amendments back to the Planning Commission for further proceedings. If this
occurs, the City Council shall specify the time within which the Planning Conunission
shall report to the City Council on the amendments.
)
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
Exhibit 3
Exhibit 4
Exhibit 5
Exhibit 6
Exhibit 7
Exhibit 8
Exhibit 9
Puget Center Partnership Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone
Proposed Amendments to FWCP Chapter 5, "Housing"
Kitts. Comer Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone
March IS. 2005, Staff Report to Planning Commission with Exhibits A.P
March 23, 2005, Planning Commission Minutes
Vicinity Map - Puget Center Partnership Site-Specific Request
March 2, 2005, EmaiI from Greg Fewins, Deputy Director of Community Development
Services, Concerning Telephone Call from Roddy Nolton
March 4,2005, Letter fTom Robert Roper, President, Mirror Lake Residents' Association
March 23. 2005, Letter from Paul Benton
1:\2004 Comprehensive Plan\2004 Update\LUTC\04180S Staff Report to the LUTCdocl3l301200S 3:5 PM
Land/Use Transportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
March 30, 2005
Page 8
.~
f II' :7
Jeral Way
RE.CE.\\JE.D
2, ~ER LAND USE APPLICATION
s£P DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
fËOERAL WAY 33530 First Way South
erN OfO\N.G DEPT. PO Box 9718
6U\\,;; Federal Way WA 98063-9718
EXHIBITJ 25J..661-400~; Fax 253--661-4129
www.cltvoffederalway.com
PAGE---L-OF -'-
PLICATION NO(S)
03-104 4-.11- ~DO
Date
18 September 2003
puget Center Partnership
roject Name
NEcorner_of SW312th Street and 1st Ave. S.
roperty AfidresslLocation
arcel Number(s)
ó~ -- 9'67tf.J 16 7~. "I-- 9' llø.]
roject Description
Undeve1oEed site
~EASE PRINT
Type of Permit Required
- Annexation
- Binding Site Plan
- Boundary Line Adjustment
---.X.- Camp PlanIRezone
- Land Suñace Modification
- Lot Line Elimination
- Preapplication Conference
~ Process I (Directo....,s Appronl)
...:..- Process II (Site Plan Review)
- Process III (Project Approval)
- Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision)
- Process V (Quasi-Judicial Rezone)
-'---- Process VI
- SEP A wlProject
_SEPAOnly
- S~oreline: Variance/Conditional Use
- Short Subdivision
- Subdivision
-.,...- Variance: ConunerciaVResidential
ReqUired Information, ..
. - /Bus1ness
BN/Ne1ghborhood Zoning Designation
BN Comprehensive Plan Designation
Unknown Value of Existing Improvements
Unknown Value of Proposed Improvements
Uniform Building Code (UBC):
.occupancy Type
Construction Type
Applicant
Paul D. Benton of
Nwne: pugetCenter Partnership
Address: 515 - l16th Ave NEt Suite 108
City/State: Bellevue, ~A
Zip: 98004
Phone: 425 990 8415
F~: 4QS 990 8419
Email: claremontdev~ol. com
Signatur~c:-.L .if 4~
Agent (if different than Applicant)
Name:
Address:
CitylState:
Zip:
Phone:
Fax:
Email: .
Signature:
Owner
puget Center Partnershîp
Name: Paul D~>-Bentofi-í"P artner
Address: 515 -. 116th Ave NE, suite 108
City/State: Be11evue, WA .
Zip: 98004
Phone: 425 990 8415
rnx: 425 990 8419
Emai.l: c1aremon~. v@abl.com
Signature.:- ~ 4- ~~.
. /ø-L" -
. I
etin #003 - March 3. 2003
rag!; I of I
k:\Handouts - Revised\Mastl~r 1.lInli r ,~.> Annl;,..";,,..
.~
CITY OF 'f/JIl' _'?'
Federal Way
RECEIVED
SEP 2 5 ZO03
DEPARTMENT OF CoMMuNITY DEVEWPMENT SERVICES
33530 First Way South
PO Box 9718
Federal Way WA 98063.9718
253-.6614000; Fax 253-.6614129
YfWW .citvotTederai waY.com
CITYOFFEQERALWAV EXHIBIT I
BUILDING DEPT. . .
APPLICATION FOR PAGE-1-0F -'
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
1.
Site Specific Requests
a)
Who may apply. Any person may, personally or through an agent, apply for a decision
regarding property he or she owns.
b) How to apply. The applicant shall file the following infonnation with the Department of
Community Development Services:
A completed Master Land Use Application.
1)
2)
Attached
A vicinity map showing the subjeQt property with enough infonnation to locate the property
within the larger area. Attached ' .
3) . A copy of the underlying plat or the King County Assessor's parcel map.
Attached
4)
The following site data:
a) Tax Parcel No. )( 08 =ll 0 t.{. - c¡ 0 74 J r 07 , « 9 / ~ 7
b) Lot Size/Acreage 4 .04 Acres
c)
d)
Existing Comprehensive Plan Designation Office Park, OP
Existing Zoning Professional Office, PO
Requested Comprehensive Plan Designation Neighborhood Business, BN
RequestedZoning Neighborhood Business, BN
e)
f)
5)
Services. Please provide the following infonnation regarding the availability of services:
a)
The site is curren~IY served by sewer ....K!septic - (;heck ~ne~. . .t ~...L.... .
Sewer Provider. ~ t L. IN JJ t ~ f \~I -
The site is currently served by a public water system X ¡weir - (check one).
Waterprovider:.~Utl Lt}\t .. ~\~ ~tèt>
Fire District#:~"' h 'Y.J Þ.t- r \ ,r; \:)\ "\\ ; ~
School District#: Federal Way sc'foOl District. T
b)
c)
d)
6)
Any additional infonnation or material that the Director'ofCommunity Development
Services detennines.is reasonably necessary for a decision on the matter.
Bulletín #024 - April 16, 2003
Page 10fJ
k:\Handouts ~ Revised\Comp Plan Amendment Application
7)
, , EXHIBI1-'
Prior to isSuance of the threshold detennination and the public heanRAGi~OF -'
Commission, the applicant must submit the following:
a)
A set of stamped envelopes, and a iist' of the same, labeled with the name and address
of aU current owners of real property (as shown in the records of the county assessor
for the subject property), within 300 feet of each boundary of the subject property,
with the return address of the City of Federal Way, Department of Community
Development Services, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063. Attached X'
b)
A copy of the county assessor==s map identitÿing the properties specified in subsection
6 'ofthis section. Attached I.
2.
OTHER REQUESTS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
a) Who may apply. Any person may, personally or through an agent, apply for an amendment to
'policies of the comprehensive plan.
b)
How to apply. The applicant shall file a completed Master Land Use application with the
Department of Community Development Services.
c)
Proposed Amendment. A proposed amendment can be either conceptual or specific
amendatory language. Please be as specific as possible so that your proposal can be adequately
considered. If specific wording changes are proposed, this should 'be shown in stfike-
eut/underline fonnat (please attach additional pages if necessary).
To change existinq zoning of Professional Office, PO, to
Neighborhood Business, BN. It has been demonstrated that
tnere ~S no aemand ror addi~îorial Ÿrore~sional Offic~ use
in the city of Federal Way.. Additionally, it has bAen
demonstrated that there is a 'demand for more Neighborhòod
Busihe:ss' zoning> 'in, this neighborhood. This applicant has
d.i.l.i.yt:mLly ::>uughL <ill pUL~llLiéll U::>~L::> [UL lJLu[t;:::õ::>siohdl
office use for over 10 years and has found no interest.*
d) Reference. Please reference the Element of the Comprehensive Plan (e.g., Lãnd Use,
Transportation, Housing, Capital Facilities) and page number where located.
Y-,f
x
3.
SUPPORT FOR THE AMENDMENT
(please fiU out for aU amendments, whether site specific or otherwise)
Please explain the need for the amendment (why is it being proposed). Include any data, research, or
reasoning thD! su~ports the p'roposed.aptendment (please attach additiollaI pages ifnecess8I:Y).. 1
*The ne~gliDorhooa cons~sts of âensely populat.el1 area or S1ng e
fa~ily I;'esiqential homes ,&nqover 400 apartment t,ln,its immediately
-ããjacënt. Tnearea, 1s uriderser~-eð' .cUL ll~.i.ghLi.ú.húua busihe55 with
only two ucoc concreting of a gas fÇ1ci1,i t-y ",i t-h ::! !':Tn::! 11 convenience
store and a real estate office. The neighborhood area clearly needs
additional neighborhood business facilities. '
Bulletin #024 - April 16, 2003
Page 2 00
k:\Haò.douts - Revised\Comp Plan Amendment Application
4.
EXHIBIT~- I -J
FEE. . . PAGEJl-°F -'-
There is no fee for the initial application. If after a public hearing the City Council detennines that the
request shall be further considered for adoption, site-specific requests must be submitted for a
preappHcation conference with a non-refundable fee that will be credited to the formal application
fee. If after the preapplication conference the applicant decides to pursue the request, the remaining
portion of the comprehensive plan amendment fee will be required. A fee must be submitted for all
other requests after the selection process.
5.
SIGNATURE
~~M~
SIgnature
18 September 2003
Date
Paul D. Benton
Print Name
If you have any questions about filling out this application fonn or the amendment process, please contact
the Department of Community Development Services at 253-661-4115. Please be advised that an
application for a comprehensive plan amendment lacking the required information will not be accepted.
/
BuUetin #024 - April 16, 2003
Page 3 of3
1c:\Handouts - Reviscd\Comp Plan Amendment Application
~ EXH I B IT ---L-
~ - PAGE-aLOF--'-
POWELL DEVELOPMENT Ce '
737 Market Street Kirkland, WA 98033
(425) 82~ Fax (425) 828-4388
September 23, 2004
Ms. Margaret Clark
Associate Planner
Community Development Services Department
City of Federal Way
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
RE:
NE Comer SW 3 12th St. & 1st Ave. So.
Parcel Numbers 082104-9074,9076 & 9167
Dear Ms. Clark:
On September 18, 2003, Puget Center Partnership, under Master Land Use Application
number 03-'104417-00 requested a Comp Plan/Rezone of its above referenced property
from Office Park (OP) to Neighborhood Business (BN).
We believe that this request is supported by what we see as a change in the city's
residential shopping patterns and supports the City Council's stated goal to reinvigorate
its retail core:
Earlier this year we commissioned a Retail Market Analysis by Robert H. Burton of
Kennedy Wilson. Mr. Burton was instrumental in bringing Metropolitan Market to Dash
Point Village. What Me. Burton found was that typical Neighborhood Business tended to
flourish in neighborhood ~ettings that were convenient to their primary customer base.
This primary customer base was typically found within one plus miles of the subject site.
He found that this neighborhood customer convenience co-efficient was dramatically
impacted by both natural and man-made barriers. Heavily congested regional arterials1
while necessary to support regional retail, has a dramatic negative impact on
Neighborhood Business.
We believe that Federal Way is currently going through a retail metamorphoses. We are
seeing significant neighborhood retail demand for moving off of Pacific Highway to the
west to be closer to their primary customer base. This trend is validated in the
overwhelming success of Metropolitan Market at Dash Point. There is a silver lining in
this potential neighborhood retail migration. When neighborhood retail moves from
regional retail locations, it not only frees up land for regional retail redevelopment but
also takes neighborhood traffic off of regional transportation corridors.
Ms. Margaret Clark
City of Federal Way
September 23,2004
Page Two
EXHISIT I
PAGE--'--OF -'-- '
We believe our requested rezone supports the council's stated goal to reinvigorate its
retail core by potentially making available appropriate property that is currently being
utilized by neighborhood uses. We believe our requested rezone will have a positive
impact to regional transportation corridors by shortening and/or intercepting
neighborhood trips by providing neighborhood services close to the neighborhoods. We
believe our requested Comp Plan Amendment and Rezone is appropriate and should be
supported by the City of Federal Way.
Sincerely,
¡;~'-k
Donald V. Barker
VP '-- Store Development
jgt
~
CITY Of #IJI -'7-"
Federal Way
EXHIBIT 4
.PAGE-LOF II
MEMO RAND UM
March 15,2005
FROM:
John Caulfield, Chair, City of Federal Way Planning Commission
Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services ~c..
Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner ()V.t(... .
To:
SUBJECf:
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
MEETING DATE: March 23,2005
. I.
BACKGROUND
Federal Way adopted its comprehensive plan in 1995 and updated it in December 1998, December
2000, November 2001, March 2003, and July 20,2004. The Growth Management Act (OMA)
limits plan updates to no more than once per year, except under the following circumstances:
I. The initial adoption of a sub-area plan that does not modify the cornptehensi ve
plan policies and designations applicable to the subarea;
2. The adoption or amendment of a sþoreline master program.
3. The amendment of the capital facilities element of a comprehensive plan that
occurs concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a .county or city budget.
Except as otherwise provided above, the governing body shall consider all proposals concurrently
so the cumulative effect of the varioùs proposals can be ascertained. However, after appropriate
public participation, a county or city may adopt amendments or revisions to its comprèhensive plan
that confonn to this chapter whenever an emergency exists, or to resolve an appeal of a
comprehensive plan filed with a growth management hearings board or with the court.
II.
2004 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
The 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments includes the following three components:
1. Puget Center Partnership Request - Request from the Puget Center Partnership to change the
comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of South 312111 Street
and east of 1st Avenue South from Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN)
(Exhibit A).
Planning Commission Memorandum
2004 Coniprehensive Plan Amendments
March 15,2005
Page I
EXHIBIT. tt '
PAGE~OF --11-
, ",
2. Housing Chapter Update - Update of "Chapter 5, Housing," of the Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) (Exhibit B).
3. Kitts Comer Request - Request from Jon Potter to change the comprehensive plan designation
and zoning of approximately 46 acres from Business Park (BP) to Community Business (Be)
and Multi-Family (RM 2400).
The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on only the first two items-Puget'Center
Partnership Request and the amendments to the 'Housing Chapter. The Planning Commission has
already held a public hearing on September 19,2001, on the Kitts Comerrequest. However, it is
being included in the current comprehensive plan amendments since the Council has not yet acted
on the request.
III.
REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, "Zoning," Article IX, "Process VI Review,"
establishes a, process and criteria for comprehensive plan amendments. Consistent with Process VI
review, the role of the Planning Conunission is as follows:
1. To review and evaluate the requests for comprehensive plan amendments;
2. To determine whether the proposed compn;:hensive plan amendments meets the
criteria provided by FWCC Sections 22-S29 and 22-530, and 22;488(c); and,
3. To forWard a recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption of the
proposed comprehensive plan amendments.
IV.
PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
2/19/0S Issuance of Determination ofNonsignificance pursuant to the State Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA)
3/07/05 End ofSEPA Comment Period
3/21/0S End of SEP A Appeal Period
3/23/0S Public Hearing before the Planning Commission
'V.
. SITE-SPECIFIC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE
In September 2003, the City received one site-specific request for a comprehensive plan
amendment and rezone. Paul Benton on behalf of the Puget Center Partnership submitted a request
to amend the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of South
312d1 Street and east of 1 It A venue South from Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business
(BN) (Exhibit A).
Planning Commission Memoratj.dum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March 15,2005
Page 2
EXHIBIT If
PAGE .-LOF ~
File Number:
Parcel No's:
Location:
Size:
Applicant:
Owner:
Request:
00.104926-00 UP
082104-9074,082104-9076 & 082104-9167
North of South 31211\ Street and east of 1st Avenue South (Exhibit C)
4.03 acres
Paul Benton on behalf of Puget Center Partnership
Same
Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning from
Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN)
Existing
Comprehensive Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Requested .
Comprehensive Plan: .
Requested Zoning:
Professional Office
Professional Office (PO)
Neighborhood Business
Neighborhood Business (BN)
Public Comments
Received:
I. Telephone call from Della Giesler, the property owner at 140 South
31211\. Ms. Giesler was interested in obtaining more information,
about the request.
2. E-mail from Roddy Nolton (Exhibit D).
3. Letter from Robert Roper, President, Mirror Lake Residents'
. Association (Exhibit E).
Background
The applicant is requesting BN zoning to build either a grocery store or a drug store. Their
application states that they have been diligently seeking a potential tenant to use this site as a
professional office for the last ten years (Exhibit A, Page 3 of 4). The applicant believes that there.
is no demand for office use in this area. Moreover, they believe that there is a change in the
residential shopping pattern with a desire to have shopping located within a convenient distance
(within one plus miles) ora residence (Exhibit F). ..
Comparison of Allowable Land Uses
A1> can be seen from the following table, many more uses are allowed in the BN zone than in the
PO zone. However, the applicant has stated that they would like to develop either a grocery store
or drug store on the site.
Use. Neighborhood Business ProCessional Office
Office use X X
Retail (grocery, produce. drugs, personal. care, books,
liquor, hardware, garden, retail nnrsery stock,
household goods, furnishings, clothing, variety, home X
electronics, sporting goods, works of art) (40,000 sq.
ft. max)
Bank & related [mandai service (40,000 sq. ft. max) X
Retail providíng lawulry, dry cleaning, beauty! barber,. X
video rental, shoe repair (40,000 SQ. ft. max)
Private lodge or club (I O~OOO sq. ft. max) X
Planning Commission Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March 15,2005
Page 3
EXHIBIT ~
PAGE ~OF I..
Use Neighborþood Business ProCessional Office
Art gallery x:
Restaurant or tavern (7,500 sq. ft. max.) X
Fast food restaurant (5,000 sq. ft.) X
Health Club (25,000 sq. ft. max) X
Retail providing entertainment, reCreational, or X
cultural services & activities (25,000 sq. ft. max)
Vehicle service .station or car wash. X
Retail providing vehicle service or repair (within an X
enclosed build¡M) .
School X X
Day care fa~ility (except Class II home occupation) X X
Multi~unit (stacked) housirig (not on the ground floor) X
08 du/acre)
Group home Type Ut_A2 X
Group home Type Il-B3 X
Social services transitional housing," Type As X
Social se~ices transitional housing, Type g' , X
Government facility X X
Public transit shelter X X
Public utility X X
Public pl .fk X X
Personal wireless service facility X X
Church X
1 Group home type II means housing for juveniles under the jurisdiction of the crinûnal justice system. Such groups include state-
licensed group care homes or halfWay homes for juveniles who provide residence in lieu of sentencing or incarceration, halfway
houses providing residence to juveniles needing correction, or for those selected to participate in State--opemted work release and
pre-release programs. .
Group homes type II-A: Maximum number of 12 residents including resident staff.
3 Group homes type 11-8: Thirteen or more residents including residential staff. Maximum number detennined on a case-by-case basis.
4 Social service transitional housing means facilities other than offices and group homes, operated by a nonprofit socialservice
agency, licensed as required by the state, providing temporary and transitional housing to individuals on an as-needed basis
including, but not limited to, et11ergency shelters, homeless shelters, and other such crisis intervention facilities. This
classification includes domestic violence shelters as defined herein, except that such shelters wherein the total number of
residents does not exceed the maximum number allowed under the "family" definition, may be pennitted outright in all
residential zones.
S Social service transitional housing Type A; Maximum number ofresidenls to be consistent with the maximum number of
unrelated adults allowed under the zoning definition of family.
6 Social service transitional housing Type B: All social service transitional housing not meeting the definition of "Type A,"
above. Maximum number detennined on a case-by-case basis. .
The linûtationon the number of residents in sociál service tranSitional housing shall not be applied ifit prohibits the City from
making reasonable accommodations to disabled'persons in order to afford such person equal opportUnity to use and enjoy a
dwelling as required by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, 42 use 3604(f)(3)(b). '
. March 15, 2005
Page 4
. Planning Conunission Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
EXHIBIT ~
PAGE--l-OF 12.
Neighborhood Characteristics
The Puget Center Partnership property is presently vacant. The adjacent use to the. north is a
single-family development, Parkwood Campus, which was constructed after incOrporation of the
City in 1990. The adjacent use to the east is also single-family. The use to the south across South
3121h is a multi-family complex (Greys tone Meadows Apartments), and across the street to the
west are a 7-11 convenience store and Papa John's Pizza on the earner, with vacant land further to
the north.
Sensitive Areas
The City's Wetland Inventory has identified a small (500-2,500 square feet) umegulated wetland
on the 1¡outhern portion of the site. At the time that a development is proposed on the site, any
environmentally sensitive areas that may be impacted must be identified and any impacts uùtigated
as part of the project-specific environmental review process. .
Drainage
These parcels are located within the MitTor Lake Basin, which has been experiencing flooding
problems. FWCC Chapter 21, "Surface and Stormwater Management," has adopted the King
County Surface Water Design MafluaJ (KCSWDM), the Federal Way Addendum to the
KCSWDM,-and the King County Storm water Pollution Control ManuilJ_(BMP Manual). In
combination, these regulations apply to all existing development, new development, and
redevelopment. Regulated development includes all single-fauùly residential development;
projects that add 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious surface; collection and
concentration of surface and stormwater runoff from a drainage area of more than 5,000 square
feet; projects which contain or directly discharge to a flOodplain, stream, lake, wetland, or closed
depression, - groundwater discharge area, or other water quality sensiti ve area; or redevelopment of
property which drains or discharges to a receiving water that has a documented water quality
problem. Development of this site for any use, whether under PO or BN zoning, will have to meet
the requirements òfthe KCSWDM, the Federal Way Addendum to the KCSWDM, and the BMP
Manual. In addition, the property is located within a Level 3 Flow Control Basin, which means
that a level 3 downstream analysis is required as described in Section 3.1.2 of the KCSWDM.
Water quality for the site must also be met through the use of technologies listed in the resource
stream: protection menu, section 6.1.3 of the 1998 KCSWDM.
Access
The Puget Center Partnership parcel is bordered on the west by 1 st A venue South and on the south
by South 3121h Street. Metro Routes 178 (peak-hour) and 901 (all-day) provide service along
South 3121h, south of the Puget Center Partnership site.
Potential TraffIC Impacts
In general, oflìce use generates more employees but fewer customers per square foot than retail
uses. Under the existing PO zoning, a two-story 56,000 square foot office could be constructed on
the 4.03-acre site. This would result in 142 peak hour trips. In comparison, a freestanding 30,000
square foot grocery store would generate 231 peak hour trips and a combination 15,000 square
foot drug store and 15,00() square foot retail store providing laundry, dry cleaning, or beauty!
barber services would generate 170 peak trips. When the Puget Center Partnership parcel is
developed, traffic mitigation, including specific street improvements, would be assessed.
Planning Commission Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March 15,2005
Page 5
EXHIBIT--!L-
PAGE ~aF 12
Projections for Population and Employment. .
The site is presently zoned PO, which does not allow residential development. A change to BN
should have no impact on the number of people who could reside on the site if a grocery store or
drug store is constructed as stated by the applicant. However the BN zone also allows multifamily
development on upper floors at a density of 18 dwelling units per acre. .
Needfor Additional Neighborhood Business Zones .
A Market Study prepared for the City in 2000 found that the City has enough capacity designated
for different uses to accommodate the 20-year employment forecast However, while there is
adequate land for employment growth in the aggregate, several districts achieve more than 50
percent buildout. These are Neighborhood Business (BN), City Center Frame (CC-F), Corporate
Park (CP-l), and Professional Office (PO). There has been only one medical office developed in
the PO zone since incorporation of the City in 1990; however, the BN zone has experienced both
new development and redevelopment of existing parcels. Examples include Metropolitan Market
at Dash Point Road and SW 312111 S~eet and the Hoyt Road Retail at Hoyt Road and SW 340111
Street. .
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Goals and Pol~cies
The overall vision of the comprehensive plan is to provide an appropriate balance of services,
employment, and housing. This comer was designated PO to provide for small-scale office
development compatible with adjacent residential neighborhoods; however, the site has not
developed in over 10 years. .
The request for a BN designation is consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan
. (FWCP). Page II-22 of the FWCP states that, "Neighborhood Business areas are intended to
provide. convenient goods (e.g., groceries' and hardware) and services (e.g., dry cleaners, dentist,
bank) at a pedestrian and neighbOrhood scale close to adjacent residential uses."
VI.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 5, HOUSING
1. Housing Chapter Update .
The following tasks were completed in order to update Chapter 5, "Housing" of the- FWCP:
.' .
(a) Data Collection - Existing data sources such as 2000 Census, Office of Financial.
Management, Central Puget Sound Real Estate Report, King County Housing
Authority, Assessor's records, Dupre + Scott, Multiple Listing Service, King County .
Benchmark Program. and adopted housing targets were reviewed.
(b) Interviews ~ Individuals and agencies representing a broad range of community
perspectives on the development and affordability of housing, conununity
development needs, and other resource needs were interviewed.
(c) Data Analysis'- Information from the data analysis and interviews was analyzed to
detennine existing inventory and projected needs.
(d) Implementation - Strategies and mechanisms for providing housing were identified.
Planning CornrnissÎon Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amèndment$
March 15,2005
Page 6
EXHIBIT --9-.-'
PAGE , OF--LL-
2. Summary of Amendments
In addition to new language, existing sections have been reammged to improve the
functioning of the chapter. The following summarizes only substantive changes:
(a) Page V-5. The section on Countywide Policies has been moved from page V-3 to
page V -5. and revised to more clearly describe the goals of the Countywide Planning
Polices relating to the provision of affordable housing.
(b) Pages V-6 - V-24. 5.2 Federal Way and its Housing - This section has been updated
based on different sources such as the 2000 Census, the April 2004, Office of
Financial Management Population Estimates, Northwest Multiple Li$ting, and
Dupre + Scott. .
(c) Page V -2 I. The Housing Capacity section has been revised to identify ways of
increasing capacity to meet its housing targets.
(d) Page V-22 ~ V-24. Language has been added to describe how zoning and
development regulations may be amended to encourage additional market housing,
and affordable and special needs housìrig.
(e) Proposed changes to policie$ are summarized in the table on the following page.
(f) Pages V-38 - V39. 5.5 Implementation Actions has been deleted since it is a
duplication of some of the policies.
VII.
COMPLIANCE WITH FWCC SECI'IONS 22-529 AND 22~S30
1. Section 22-529. Factors to 'be Considered in a Comprehensive PlanAmendment- The City
may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors when considering a proposed .
. amendment to the comprehensive plan:
(1) The effect upon the physical environment.
Amending "Chapter 5, Housìrig," of the FWCP is a non-project action and would havè
no effect on the physiCal environment Development is not proposed in conjunction with
the request by Puget Center Partnership for a change in comprehensive plan designation
and zoning from Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN). Any
proposed development on the site will be subject to environmental review as required by
the SEP A Rules, and will be evaluated in accordance with all plans, policies, rul~s. and
regulations adopted as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to
approve, condition, or deny proposed actions.
(2) The effect.on open space, streams, and lakes.
Amending "Chapter 5, Housing," of the FWCP and th~ Puget Center Partnership
request for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone are non-project actions and
would have no effect on open space, streams, and lakes.
Planning Commission Memorandum
2004-Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March 15,2005
Page 7
Increase Diversify Increase Encourage Provide for Address Increase Encourage Mixed-' Improve Deiete Policy
Housing Housing Affordable Innovative Special Needs Compatibility Open Space Use Developments Wording
Capacity Housing Housing IJousing Between Diverse .. In in Commercial
Housing Developments Areas
Amend Amend Amend Amend new lIP39 . Add new HP13 Add new Amend new HP1S New Delete existing
existing existing new HP3 HPl9 HP5 Policy HP2
HPI BPI
Add new Add new Add new Add new HP40 . New Delete existing
HP14. HPI5 HP22 HPI2 HPI4. Include
language in new
BPI7
Amend Amend. M 0 ctify Amend new HP42 New Delete existing
newHPI7 new new HP26 . HP20 HP15
HP17
Add new Delete existing . New
HP27 HP38 & HP40 HP23
Add language to
new HP45 to
address these
. policies
Modify Amend new HP46 New
new HP28 HP35
Add new .New
HP29 HP36
~m
It;><
r...~
r'~
0
..,
Planning Connnission Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March 15,200
Page
EXHIBIT ~
P AGE ....!L 0 F :.t.2...-
. .
(3) The compatibility wtih and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods.
Amending "Chapter 5, Housing," of the FWCP will have no direct effect on development
within the CitY. However, code amendments adopted in order to implement goals and
policies of Chapter 5 may result in development. At the time of any development, the
compatibility and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods will be
, evaluated. Any development resulting from a (BN designation on the Puget Center
Partnership site should be compatible with adjacent land uses, including surrounding
single-family uses, since the intent of the BN zone is to provide convenient goods and
services at a pedestrian and neighborhood scale close to adjacent residential uses.
(4) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public
transportation, parks, recreation, and schools. ,
Amending the Housing Chapter is a non-project action. Thereforç, any amendments to
the chapter would not impact conununity facilities such as utilities, parks, recreation,
and schools. If the Puget Center site-specific request is granted, specific impacts
associated with development will be evaluated at the time tl!at a development pemiit is
applied for, and any potential adverse impacts will be mitigated at that time.
(5) The benefit to the neighborhood, city, and region.. .
Ame¡nding the Housing Chapter to provide for a diverse. range of housing, including
affordable housing, that is compatible with neighborhood character and meets the City's
design guidelines, will benefit the neighborhood, City, and region, while also meeting
the adopted housing targets. Granting the Puget Center Partnership's request for a BN
designation for their si.to may result in the development of a previously vacant site as
either a grocery store or a drug store, thereby providing services for the surrounding
neighborhood and contributing to the economic development of the City.
(6) The quantity and location of land plannedfor the proposed land use type and density
and t~e demand for such land.
Amending the Housing Chapter is a non-project action, wmch will not in itse,lf affect
land uses. Subsequent amendments intended to implement'goals and policies of the
Housing Chapter may include amendments to the development regulations and
comprehensive land use map. The applicant is requesting BN zoning to build either a
grocery store or a drug store. Their application states that they have been diligently
seeking a potential tenant to use this site as a professional office for the last ten years
(Exhibit A). The applicant believes that there is no demand for office use in this area.
Moreover, they believe that there is a change in the residential shopping pattern with a
desire to have shopping located within a convenient distance (within one plus miles) of
a residence. In.addition, based on the July 2000 Marlœt Analysis, the BN zone was
anticipated to build out by 75 percent over the 2000-2020 period. This was the second
highest build out rate for a conunercial zone after the City Center Frame.
(7) The cutrent and projected pop~lation density in the area~ .
Amending the Housing Chapter is a non-project action; therefore, this criterion is not
applicable. The Puget Center Partnership site is presently zoned PO, which does not
allow residential development. A change to BN should have no impact on the number of
people who could reside on the site if a grocery store or drug store is constructed as
stated by the applicant. However the BN zone also allows multifamily development on
upper floors at a density of 18 dwelling units per acre.
Planning Commission Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March IS, 2005
. Page 9
EXHIBIT It. . .
'PAGE.. ,.~
(8) The effect upon other aspects of the comprehensive plan.
Implementation of the goals and policies of the Housing Chapter may result in increased
housing capacity which would result in changes to "Chapter 2, Land Use," of the FWCP
in a future comprehensive plan amendment cycle. Granting a change in comprehensive
plan designation and zoning from PO to 8N should not affect other aspects of the
comprehensive plan.
2.
Section 22-530. Criteria for Amending the Comprehensive Plan - The City may amend the
comprehensive plan only if it finds that:
(1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or
welfare. " '
Amending the Housing Chapter to provide for a diverse range ofhou&ing, including
affordable housing, bears a substantiaheIationship to public health, safety, and welfare
because it may result in a more stable environment for families. Designating the Puget
Center Partnership site as BN may result in development of the site, which should
benefit the surrounding area.
AND
(2) . The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the city.
Please see response under (1), above.
(3) The,proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36. 70A and with
the portion of the city s adopted plan not affected by the amendment.
RCW Chapter 36.70A.O20(4) of the Growth Management Act, encourages the
availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state,
provision of a variety of residential densities and housing types, and preservation of
existing housing stoCk~ Granting a 8N ~esignation to the Puget Center Partnership is
, consistent With RCW 36.70AO20(5), which states that the economic developments goal
if to, "Encourage economic dèvelopment throughout the state that is consistent with
adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizeris of this state,
especially for unemployed and 'for disadvantaged persons, promote the retention and
expansion of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses, recognize regional
differences impacting economic development opportunities, and encourage growth in
areas experiencing insufficient economîc growth, all within the capacities of the state's
natural resources, public services', and public facilities."
VIII.
COMPLIANCE WITH FWCC SECTION 22-488(c)
Site-specific requests are required to be evaluated for compliance with this sectlon.7
1)
The city may approve the application only ifit finds that:
7 This section applies only to site.speeific requests; therefore, it applies only to the Puget Center Partnership request and not the
proposed amendments to the Housing Chapter.
,.planoing Commission -Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March 15, 2005
Page to
EXHIBIT 4 -
PAGE' ,,~
a.
The proposed request is in the best intel"ests of the residents of the city;
Designating the Puget Center 'Partnership site as BN may result in development of the
site, which should benefit the surrounding area. .
AND
b.
The proposed request is appropriate because either:
L
Conditions in the immediate vicinity of the subject property have so significantly
changed since the property was given its present zoning that, under those changed
conditions, a change in designation is within the public interest.
Land uses in the inunediate vicinity of the Puget Center Partnership site have not
significantly changed during the last five years. }'he adjacent use to the north is a
single-family development, Parkwood Campus, which was constructed after
incorporation of the City in 1990. The adjacent use to the east is also single-family.
The use to the south across South 31ih is a multi-family complex (Greystone
Meadows Apartments), and across the stieetto the west are a 7-11 convenience
store and Papa John's Pizza on the comer, with vacant land further to the north.
However, a change in designation may be in the public interest, since the applicant
states that they have been diligently seeking a potential tenant to use this site as a
professional office for the last ten years and have not received any interest
OR
ii.
The change in designation will correct a designation that was inappropriate when
establish~.
Not applicable.
c.
It is consistent with the comprehensive plan;
The request for a BN designation by the Puget Center Partnership is consistent with the
FWCP. Page IT-22 of the FWCP states that, "Neighborhood Business areas are intended
to provide convenientgoods (e.g., groceries and hardware) and services (e.g., dry
cleaners, dentist, bank) at a pedestrian and neighborhood scale close to adjacent
residential uses." . .
d.
It is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those adopted by
reference from the comprehensive plan;
If the Puget Center Partnership request is approved and these parcels designated as BN,
any subsequent development would be required to b~ consistent with aU applicable
provisions of this chapter (zoning code).
AND'
e.
It is cQnsistent with the púhlic health, safety, and w~lfare. ,
Granting the requested change from PO to BN is consistent with the policies in the
comprehensive plan and it is also consistent wi~h the public health, safety, and welfare.
Planning Conunission Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March 15,2005
Page II
EXHIBIT ~ '
PAGE---LÀOF 1.1.-
Designating the puget Center Partnership site as BN may result in development of the
site, which should benefit the surrounding area.
'.
2)
The city may approve an application for a quasi-judicial project related rezone only if it finds that:
a.
b.
The criteria in subsection (I) above are met; AND
The proposedprojecJ complies with this chapter in all respects; AND
The site plan of the proposed projeCt is designed to minimize all adverse impacts on
the developed properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property; AND
The site plan is designed to minimize impacts upon the public services and utilities.
c.
d.
This is a proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan, it is not a project~related rezone,
and therefore; the criteria under this section do not apply.
Ix.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the proposed amendments to FWCP Chapter 5, "Housing" (Exhibit B) and
the site~specific request by the Puget Center Partnership to change the comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of South 312111 Street and east of 1 $t Avenue
South tTom Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN) (Exhibit A) be approved.
-x.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Consistent with the provisions ofFWCC Section 22-539, the Planning Commission may take the
following actions regarding the proposed comprehensive plan amendment:
1 Recommend to City Council adoption ~f the proposed comprehensive plan
amendments as proposed;
2. Recommend to City Council that the proposed comprehensive plan amendments not
be adopted; - - -
3. Forward the proposed comprehensive plan amendments to City Council without a
recommendation; or '
4. Modify the proposed comprehensive plan amendments and recommend to City
- Council adoption of the amendment as modified.
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Puget Center Partnership Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone
Proposed Amendments to FWCP Chapter 5, "Housing"
Vicinity Map - Puget Center Partnership Site-Specific Request
E-Mail Comment trom Roddy Nolton
Comment Letter from Robert Roper on Behalf of the Mirror Lake Residents' Association
Letter ftom Donald Barket,Powell Development Company
1:\2004 Comprehensive PlaiI\2004 Updatc:\Planning Commission\Report to Plannmg Comm~ion.dQC/O3116l2005 8:32 AM
Planning Commission Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
'March 15,2005
. Page 12
~
CITY OF 'fill' , - .::í'
Federal Way
RECE\\lE.O
p 2, ~ER LAND USE 'APPLICATION
Sf. - DEPARTMENToFCOMMUNITYDBVELOPMENTS'ERV(CES
F FEDERAL WAY 33530 First Way South
Cl~8\LOING DEPT. . PO Box 9718
- ~ _~era{ WayWA 98063.9718
EXHIBIT "~ (-400~; Fax 253-661-41,29 ,
PAGE---LOF -"- www.cltyoffederalwav.com
~PPLICA T[ON NO(S)
03-IOY 4-11- -00
Date
18 September 2003
Project Name
puget Center Partnership
~roperty A~dress/Location NE corner of SW 312th Street and 1st Ave. S.
)arcel Number(s)
ð8-1J 01-- 9'67tfJ 1tJ 7 ~ ~ r:¡ W
Jroject Description
Undeveloped site
'LEASE PRINT
Type of Permit Reqùired
- Annexation
- Binding Site Plap
----.: Boundary Line Adjustment
---X...... Comp Plan!Rezone
- Land Surface Modification
- Lot Line Elimination
- Preapplication Conferènce
- Process I (Director=s Approval)
--=-- Process II (Site Plan Review) .
- Process III (Project Approval)
- Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision)
- Process V (Quasi-Judicial Rezone)
- Process VI
_SErA wlProject
~ SErA Only
- Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use
- Short Subdivision
- Subdivision.
- Variance: ConunerciaVResidential
Required Information
. - /Business
aN /Ne1ghborhood Zoning Designation
BN Comprehensive Plan Designation
Unknown Value of Existing Improvements
Unknown Value of Proposed Improvements
Unifonn Building Code (UBC):
Occupancy Type
Construction Type
Applicant
. Paul D. Benton of
Name: Puget Center Partnership
Address: 515 - 116th Ave NE I Suite 108
City/State: Bellevue, WA
Zip:' 98004
Phone: 425 990 8415
F~: 425 990 8419
Email: claremon~ev~o~
Signatur~ ~ 'l ..-ó'~
Agent (if different than Applicant)
Name: .
Address:
City/State:
Zip:
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
Signature:
Owner
Puget Center Partnérship
Name: Paul D.',.-Benton:,; -Partner
Address: 515 - 116th Ave' NE, Suite 108
City/State:: Bellevue, WA
Zip: 98004 .
Phone: 425 990 8415
F~: 425 990 8419 .
Email: claremont v@aol.com
Signature:- k.. .4.. - " ~~
Iletill #003 - March 3. 2003
k:\Halldouts - Revised\Mastcr LalldUs.; Applic;.tti('n
rag!; I of I
~
CITY Of .., " ~
Federal Way
DUAR~O'Co~~~~ if
VE"O " 33530 First Way South
REGE' " PO Box 9718
Federal Way WA 98063-9718
253~61-4000; Fax 253~61-4129
" WWw.citvoffederalway.com
SEP 2 fi 2003
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
BUILDING DEPT.
APPLICATION FOR.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
1.
Site Specific Requests
a)
Who may apply. Any persön may, personally or through an agent, apply for a decision
regarding property he or she owns.
b) How to apply. The applicant shall file the following information with the Department of
Community Development Services:
A completed Master Land Use Application.
1)
2)
Attached
A vicinity map showing the subject property with enough infonnation to locate the property
within the larger area. Attached" . "
3)
A copy of the underlying plat or the King County Assessor's parcel map.
Attached
4) The following site data: ""
a) Tax Parcel No. )( 08 =ll 0 iJ - <J (} 74....1 r 07 , <it 91 ~ 7 "
b) LotSÍZelAcreage 4.04 Acres
c)
d)
Existing Comprehensive Plan Designation Office Park, OP
ExistingZoning Professional Office, PO
Requested Comprehensive Plan Designation Neighborhood Business, BN
RequeStedZoning Neighborhood Business, BN
e)
t)
5)
Services. Please provide the following infonnation regarding the availability of services:
a)
The site is currently served by sewer --1L'septic - Cfheck one~. , '..t c...L....
. Sewer Provider. ~t L I W JJ t! ,. ~ICI ~
The site is currently served by a public water system X ¡weir - (check one).
waterprovider:~. " lIt) Lt}v .þ\~ì I(lèP"
Fire District#:~" \... W ~ r , ,r; 1)\ "\) ~ \
School District#: Federal Way sc'fool District ~ \
b)
c)
d)
6)
Any additional infonnation or material that the Director of Community Development
Services determines is reasonably necessary for a decision on the matter.
BuUetin 11024 - April 16, 2003
Page I of3
lc:\Handouts - Revised\Comp Plan Amendment Application
.'
7)
. . . . . I:XHIBIT~ If
Prior to ISSuance of the threshold detennmatton and the public hew~ the ~n~ I....J.
Commission, the applicant must submit the following: ' rAUC----8L-ur ~
a)
A set of stamped envelopes, and a list of the same, labeled with the name and address
, of aU current owners of real property (as shown in the records of the county assessor
for the subject property), within 300 feet of each boundary of the subject property,
with the return address of the City of Federal Way, Department of Community
Development Services, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063. Attached \
b)
A copy of the county assessor=s map identifying the properties specified in subsection
6 of'this section. Attached ¡(
2.
OTHER REQUEST$ FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
a)
Who may apply. Any person may, -perSonally or through an agent, apply for an amendment to
policies of the comprehensive plan.
b)
How to' apply. The applicant shall file a completed Master Land Use application with the
Department of Community Development Services.
c)
Proposed Amendment A propòsed amendment can be either conceptual or specific
amendatory language. Please be as specific as possible so that your proposal can be adequately
considered. If specific wording changes are proposed, this' should be shown in stfike-
eutlunderline fonnat (please attach additional pages if necessary).
To chanqe existinq zoninq of Professional Office, PO, to
Neighborhood Business', BN. It has been demonstrated that
tner~ 1S no demand tor aaditional Professional Office use
in tho city of Fodera!. Way - , Additionally. it ha~ 1:>een
demonstrated that there is a demand for more Neighborhood
Busine'ss zoning 'in this neighporhood. This applicant has
ùiliyenLly ~UU9hL 1:111 pul~mLidl u~eI.:::; Lui pLu[t:::::;::...i..ol1ð.l
- office use for over-tO years and has found no interest.*
d) . Reference. Please reference. the Element of the Comprehensive Plan (e.g.. Land Use,
Transportation,-Housing, Capital Facilities) and page number where located.
ÿ.f
,x
3.
SUPPORT, FOR THE AMENDMENT
(please fill out for aU amendments, whether site specific or othetWise)
Please explain, the need for the amendment(why is it being proposed). Include any data. research, or
, reasoning that supports the p'coposed a.mendmçnt (p,lease attach additiol1al øaus if necessacY).. 1
*The neigliborhooa consJ..sts of âensely populat.el1 area OL S1.ng e
fa~ily residential homes ,and. over 400 apartment units immediately
aãjacent. . 'i'he area is uriderserveð fOL mÚyhliuihood' Lllsiness with
only t~o ucos concictingof a ~as P~~j'f~y wi~h ~ ~m~]] convenience
store and' a -real ,estate. office. ,The neighborhood area cleârly needs
additional neighborhood business'facilities.
Bulletin #024 - April 16,2003
~age 2 of3
k:\Handouts - Revised\Comp Plan Amendment Application
4.
EXHIBIT ~ ,,/.
. PAGE-'lL°F -Jf-
There is no fee for the initial application. If after a public hearing the City Council determines that the
request shaU be further considered for adoption, site-specific requests must be submitted for a
preapplication conference with a non-refundable fee that will be credited to the fonnal application
fee. If after the preapplication conference the applicant decides to pursue the request, the remaining
portion of the comprehensive plan amendment fee wi[[ be required. A fee must be submitted for aU
other requests after the selection process.
FEE
5.
SIGNATURE
~~ i/ ~~
Signature '
18 September '2003,
Date'
Paul D. Benton
Print Name
[fyou have any questions about fi[[¡ng out this application fonn or the amendment process, please contact
the Department of Community Development Services at 253-661-4115. Please be advised that an
application for a cOmprehensive plan amendment lacking the required information will not be accepted.
/
Bulletin #024 - April 16, 2003
Page 3 of3
k:~douts - Revised\Comp Plan Amendment App(jqûion
$W 3017M ST
f;tS7¡2
PO
~.
"
",
RM1800
RS7.2
:1:-
Requested Designation:
Comprehensive Plan: '
Neighborhood Business
Zoning: BN
RM2400
Note: This map is intended for use as a graphical representation only.
Thll City of Fllderal Way maMS no WSlTllnty as fa its accuracy.
200 0 200 400 eoo 800 Feet ^'
,~~ j ~
"
City of' Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan
2004'
SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS
,FORCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN
'DESIGNATION CHANGES
Puget Center
Partnership,
Site Specific Request
Key:
~~~~t Steep Slopes
'~~~J;"~
- Wetlands
- Site Requests
~.m
G;><
m:C
b~
t
~
M"I"I P"¡l"It..l'I~ ,.....tt,....,~./I ?nr\1;
[Margaret gar\< - OP tó B}~ r~quest on 312th
=
- ~
~=:
Page 1 J
From:
To: .
Date:
Subject:
Greg FeWins
Margaret Clark
3/2120058:30:47 AM
OP to BN request on 312th
EXHIBIT . . ~ ~'f
PAGE.---Ì-OF ~
Rody Nolton called at the request of Bob Roper from Mirror Lake and from the pastor of his church that
must be in the area of the requested plan and zone change. Roper is concerned with water quality and
flooding, and the church is concerned with allowable uses (e.g. Rody mentioned a tavern). I encourage
" him and the people he is representing to attend the hearing/meeting process and/or pr;ovide Comments.
Greg
4 March 2005
cOwd REceIVED BY
UNITY DevaoPM~ DEPARTMENT
MAR 0 7¿OO5
.J
Mirror Lake Residents' Assochition
525 SW 312do St
Federal Way W A 98023
EXHIBIT~ 't
PAGE I OF J.
Margaret Clark, Senior Planner
City of Federal Way
P.O. Box 9718
33530 First Way South
Federal WåY, WA 98003
Re: Rezone of NE comer SW 312dÌ St & ISlA ve S.
Parcel Numbers 082104-9074, 9076 and 9167
/
Dear Ms. Clark,
Thank you for notification of a proposed rezone of the subject property and for the
opportunity to offer comments. At our meeting on March 2 2005, the Mirror Lake
Residents' Association (MLRA) discussed the proposal and the following issues arose:
-General-Neighborhood Business (BN) is viewed as a more intense use than
Professional Office, with longer hours of operation, increased traffic of delivery
vehicles/customers and increased potential for pollution producing activities.
-Surface Water Quality-Pollution is a concern to the MLRA because in times of
sustained or heavy rain, the drainage basin in which the subject property is situated
connects with the basin in which Mirror Lake lies. Atthese times, flow is into Mirror
Lake. Many of the BN pennitted uses, such as grOcery and garden stores, vehicle service
stations and vehicle repair have the potential for affecting surface water quality,
-Traffic - There is concern that what are now peak: volumes will be experienced
throughout the day. While improvements to 312111 between III Ave S and Dash Point
Road are planned in the future, the road is not now ready for the pressure of increased
retaiL
-Surplus Capacity - There is currently surplus capacity of both office space and retail in
Federal Way.
-Safety - There is concern for the effect of increased traffic on safety of children
attending the daycare across 312111 and nearby schools. .
" EXHIBIT.-£..f! L
.Proximity of Retail-There is already an abundance of retail in thr~9n~y or!: OF ~
. requested rezone. Pacific Highway South is 0.9 miles to the east and other neighborhood
business centers are 0.5 and 1.0 miles to the west and 1.0 miles to the south. Powell
Development, in their letter, claims ,that moving retail out of downtown to the west will
free up land for development of the retail core. However, there are currently many empty
storefronts in downtown Federal Way. .
.Consensus - There was no support for the rezone among those attending the meeting.
Please place MLRA on the list for notification of aU future meetings, hearings or other
actions involving this proposed comprehensive plan amendment.
Yours truly, ,
<..:""-------)~, ~
.. \ç~'" '..~ ~
".. . ~ .' .,-'
.-' ,. /'
Robert S. Roper, as President
Mirror Lake Residents' Association
".-""",,:o..,...,.:,'.----",-y-
It) EXHIBIT 1J!L ,
POWELL DEVELOPMENT C0 PAGE . . OF-L.
73TMarket Street Kirkland, WA 98033
(425) 828-4444 Fax (425) 8284388 -
September 23, 2004
Ms. Margaret Clark
Associate Planner
Community Development Services Department
City of Federal Way - -
33325 81b Avenue South
Federal Way, W A 98003
RE:
NE Comer SW 3121b St. & 1st Ave. So.
Parcel Numbers 082104-9074, 9076 & 9167
Dear Ms. Clark:
On September 18, 2003, Puget Center Partnership, under Master Land Use Application
number 03-104417-00 requested a Comp Plan/Rezone of its above referenced' property
from Office Park (OP) to Neighborhood Business (BN).
We believe that this request is supported by what we see as a change in the city's
residential shopping patterns and supports the City Council's stated goal to reinvigorate
its retail core. -
Earlier this year we Commissioned a Retail Market Analysis by Robert H. Burton of
Kennedy Wilson. Mr. Burton was instrumental in bringing Metropolitan Market to Dash
Point Village. What Mr. Burton found was that typical Neighborhood Business tended to
flourish in neighborhood settings that were convenient to their primary customer base.
This primary customer base was typically found within one plus miles of the subject site.
He found that this neighborhood customer convenience co-efficient was dramatically
impacted by both natural and man-made barriers. Heavily congested regional arterials,
while necessary to support regional retail, has a dramatic negative impact on
Neighborhood Business.
We believe that Federal Way is currently going through a retail metamorphoses. We are
seeing significant neighborhood retail demand for moving off of Pacific Highway to the
west to be closer to their primary customer base. This trend is' validated in the
overwheInùng success of Metropolitan Market at Dash Point. There is a silver lining in
this potential neighborhood retail migration. When neighborhood retáil moves from
regional retail locations, it not only frees up land for regional retail redevelopment but
also takes neighborhood traffic off of regional transportation corridors~
"c.""c",.'""
", ""'."'>,:¡':F""":""":!;':I::""<;"/":;,' ,
Ms. Margaret Clark
City of Fedcnd Way
September 23, 2004
, Page Two
EXHIBIT.-.E...2£i,:",
PAGE a OF--I&:..
We believe our requ~ted rezon~ supports the còuricil's stated goal to reinvigorate its
ret;1ÌI core by potentially making avaHable appropriate property that is currently being
utilized by neighborhood uses. We believe our requested rezone will have a positive
impact to regional transportation coITÌdors by shortening and/or intercepting
neighborhood trips by providing neighborhood services close to the neighborhoods. We
believe our requested Comp Plan Amendment and Rezone is appropriate and should be
supported by the City of Federal Way.
Sincerely,
I~~
Donald V. Barker
VP - Store Development
jgt
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PLANNING COMMISSION
~IB~~
March 23, 2005
~.m.
City Hall
CoWlciI Chambers
MEETING MINUTES
Commissioners present: John Caulfield, Hope Elder, Bill Drake, Dini Duclos, Merle Pfeifer, and Lawson
Bronson. Commissioners absent: Dave Osaki (excused). Alternate Commissioners present: Pan Duncan-
Pierce. Alternate Commissioners absent: Christine Nelson (excused) and Tony Moore (unexcused). Staff
present: Senior Planner Margaret Clark, AssistantCity Attomey Amy Jo Pearsall, Consultant Betsy Czark,
and Administrative Assistant E. Tina Piety. .'.
Chair Caulfield called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
......
ApPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was'mlslc to adopt the March 2,2005, minutes as presented.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
None
ADMINISTRATIVE REpORT -
Ms. Piety infonned the Commission that the Annual VolWlteer Dinner is scheduled for April 22, 2005. This
year the City will be hosting a mystery dinner put on by the company that does the Murder Mystery Dinners
on the Dinner Train. It should be a lot of fun and she hopes all the Commissioners will be able to attend.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PuBLIC HEARING - 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
The Commission first discussed the Site-Specific Request. Ms. Clark delivered the staff presentation. She
stated that the proposed amendment includes the Kitts Comer Site-Specific Request that the Commission
has already reviewed and therefore, is not part of this Public Hearing. The Site-Specific Request that is the
subject of this Public Hearing is Puget Center Partnership's application to amend the comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of South 3 12th Street and east of 1st Avenue South from
Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN). The Cooumssion had no questions for staff and
the Public Testimony was opened.
Don Barker - He is with Powell Development and is the developer for this project. He
commented that as Ms. Clark explained, any development would require mitigation. He has
worked on another project in the City and knows to expect strict requirements. He feels the
project will enhance the water quality of the area and will help control flooding. He believes the
IC:lPlannini: Cornonimonl200SlMeeting Swrmary 03.23-~S.doc
Planning Commission Minutes
E*HfBfr' ,5 '
PAGE '2. OF 1~~3,2°O;
City wiil require them to construct curb, gutter, and sidewalk, which will enhance pedestrian
activity in the neighborhood. He envisions this to be a neighborhood shopping center; a place
people can go to meet their neighbors fora cup of coffee. He stated they can give it anaesthetic
connection to the neighborhood. '
Page 2
Paul Benton - He represents the owner of the shopping center. He read a letter into the recoid.
In the letter,' he states that he believes, "... that water quality and flooding issues will be
adequately addressed through cutTent City rules and regulations." In addition, the letter states
they are willing to, "" ,deed restrict the property trom being used as a bar, tavern, cocktail
lounge, adult bookstore, adult video store, or other adult entertainment business and for the
renting, leasing, or sèlling of any boat, motor vehicle, or trailer,"
Robert Burton - He is an Associate Br:oker and has been in the real estate business for 38 years.
In addition, he teaches corporate real estate at a local college. He has researched retail uses in
Federal Way. He commented that a small shopping center draws trom within one mile. He feels
this neighborhood would be better served by a small shopping center. He stated that the last
three grocery stores in Federal Way have gone into neighborhoods.
Bob Roper~ He is the President of the Mirror Lake Resident's Association. He commented that
BN is more intense than PO. He feels we have enough BN in the City. He doesn't agree with the
water quality standards used by the City. He feels the City should be using standards that deal
more with phosphates. In a recent Mirror Lake Resident's Association meeting, there was no
support for this rezone.-
Don Barlœr -In response to a question froI11 a Commissioner, he stated that they are talking to
retailers, but no one has signed on as yet
Bob Roper - His comments are in regard to the discussion the Commission had regarding water
quality. He stated that ~e City uses the King County Surface Water Design Manual, which has
two menus for pollution in lakes and streams. One menu deals mostly with zinc and the other
mostly with phosphates. While there is not a current problem, Mirror Lake hat'¡ the potential for a
serious problem with phosphates.
. There was no - furtl1(~r public testimony on this issue.
Ms. Czark delivered the staff presentation on the update to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP)
Housing chapter. There is no major vision change. Staff has rearranged and condensed information. In
addition, language was added regarding possible methods to increase capacity, affordable housing, and
housing choice. Finally, two new sections were added on hóusehold size and housing cost and affordability.
Ms. Czark commented that Federal Way has the largest household size in South King County and close to
the highest median household income, but still has a large number ofIow income households. She went
over the policy changes and noted that HP22 should be deleted because HP21 says the same thing. In
addition, a heading, "Emergency and Transitional Housing," was added to HG6 because there was no
heading previously.
There was no public testimony on the Housing Chapter. Commissioner Duclos expressed her concern with
the transitional housing requirements and how she feels those requirements discriminate against people in
need of transitional housing by signaling them out for special requirements. The entire Commission agreed
that sometime in the future they would like to review the requirements for transitional housing.
KlPlanning CommissionUOO:I\Mceting SIIII1mOI}' OHJ-OS.doc
Page 3
~ L"'h23,2005
- Planning Conunission Minutes
It was m/slc to recommend to the City Council adoption of the proposed comprehensive plan amendments
as drafted in the staff report, with the modification that Puget Sound Partnership's proposed deed
restrictions be put into place. -
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
Ms. Clark infonned the Commission that the next meeting will be April 20th, at which time there will be a
public hearing on signs along Interstate-5.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
None
ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 8:21 p.m. .
g:\PlInning c"nnissionl2OOm<etfnc S"""""'Y 03-23'()S.doc
I
~
I
SW3Omtsr
,!¡
~S7 .,2
PO
~
j
~
,
,--
RM1800
RS7.2
.:,:~
Requested Designation:
Comprehensive Plan: -
Neighborhood Business
Zoning: BN
~
RM2400
Note: This mep is intended for U$& as a grsphicsl representation only.
The CitY of Federsl Way makes no warranty liS to its IICCUntCy.
~: 200 400 600 ~ Feet A
N
City of Federal Way
Comprehensjve PJan-
, 2004
SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS
FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DESIGNATION CHANGES
Puget Center
Partnership
Site Specific Request
Key:
¡~1'~¡¡ Steep Slopes
!ilrÞ,.
- Wetlands
- Site Requests
;gm
C)(
¡m§
-.~
. -
0
F'"
Map Printed.January 14, 2005
IVICU <11 t'l vl<1rK - Ut' [0 tsN re uest on 312th
Pa e 1
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Greg Fewins
Margaret Clark
312/20058:30:47 AM
OP to BN request on 312th
EXHIBIT 7
PAGE-LOF I
Rody Nolton called aUhe request of Bob Roper from Mitror Lake and from the pastor of his church that
must be in the area of the requested plan and zone change. Roper is concerned with water quality and
flooding, and the church is concerned with allowable uses (e.g. Rody mentioned a tavern). I encourage
him and the people he is representing to attend the hearing/meeting process .and/or provide comments.
Greg
4 March 2005
COMMlJNJTYg~£.ElVeD BY
Ii;vQ.OPUENT DEPARTMENT
MAR 0 7 2005
Mirror Llike Residents' Association
525 SW 312111 St
Federal Way W A 98023
. '. 'EXHIBI'F~'~~"S~
PAGE---LOF -2.
Margaret Clark, Senior Planner
City of Federal Way
P.O. Box 9718
33530 First Way South
Federal Way, W A 98003
Re: RewneofNE comerSW312111 St& 1st Ave S.
Parcel Numbers 082104-9074, 9076 and 9167
Dear Ms, Clark,
'Thank you for notification of a proposed rezoQe of the subjeCt property and for the
opportunity to offer comments. At our meeting on March 22005, the Mirror Lake
Residents' Association (MLRA) discussed the proposal and the following issues arose:
-General-Neighborhood Business (BN) is viewl?d as a more intense use than
Professional Office, with longer hours of operation, increased ,tTaffic of deli very
vehicles/customers and increased potential for pollution producing activities.
-Surface Water Quality-Pollution is a concern to the MLRA because in times of
sustained or heavy rain, the drainage basin in which the subject property is situated
connects with the basin in which Mirror Lake lies. At these times, flow is into Mirror
Lake. Many of the BN pennitted uses, such as grocery and garden stores, vehicle service
stations and vehicle repair have the potential for affecting surface water quality.
-Traffic- There is Concern that what are now peak volumes will be experienced
throughout the day. While improvements to 312m between 1st Ave S and Dash Point
Road are planned- in the future, the road is not now ready for the, pressure of increased
retail.
-Surplus Capacity-There is currently surplus capacity of both office space and retail in
Federal Way.
.Safety - There is concern fot the effect of increased traffic on safety of children
attending the daycare across 312m and nearby schools.
EXHIBIT 8
PAGE~OF ....
-Proximity of Retail- There is already an abundance of retail in the vicinity of the
requested rezone. Pacific Highway South is 0.9 miles to the east and other neighborhood
business centers are 0.5 and 1.0 miles to the west and 1.0 núles to the south. Powell
Development, in their letter, claims that moving retail out of downtown to the west will
free up land for development of the retail core. However, there are currently manY,empty
storefronts in downtown Federal Way. .
-Consensus- There was no support for the rezone among those attending the meeting.
,Please place MLRA on the list for notification of all future meetings, hearings or other
actions involving this proposed comprehensive plan amendment
Yours truly,
c---~
Robert S. Roper, as President
MirrorLake Residents' Association
EXHIBIT~
PAGE-LOF ,
March 23, 2005
Mr. John Caulfield
Chairman
Federal Way Planning Conunission
PO Box 9718
"Federal Way, WA 98003
Rezone orNE Comer SW 3 12th & 1st Ave. So.
Parcel Numbers 082104-9074, 9076 and 9167
RE:
Dear Mr. Caulfield:
I appreciate that the Planning Commission has agreed to hear my Comprehensive Plan
amendment request for the referenced parcels.
As part of the public record, the planning staff, on behalfofthe city, received an e-mail
from Mr. Greg Fewins dated 3/2/2005. In Mr. Fewins' .e-mail, he expresses the concerns
of Min-or Lake residents. -These concerns dealt with water quality, flooding, and
obnoxious uses. I believe that the water quality and flooding issues can and will be
adequately addressed through current city rules and regulations. As it relates to potential
- obnoxious uses, the property owners, as a condition to obtaining our requestçd
Comprehensive Plan change and rezone, will agree to deed restrict the property from
being used as a bar, tavern, cocktail lounge, adult bookstore, adult video store, or other
adult entertainment business and for the renting, leasing, or selling of any boat,-motor
vehicle, or trailer. -
Over the past many years, we have always had the interest of the Federal Way
community in mind. We think our request is consistent with this interest.
Sincerely,
-~~d~
Paul Benton
Manager
Puget Center, LLC
APRIL 25, 2005
MEMORANDUM
TO
. THE LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION,
COMMITT.EE
...~
CITY OF ~
Federal Way
MEMO RAND UM
C(Q)[Pl{
April 25, 2005
To:
Jack Dovey, Chair
Land Useffransportation Committee (LUTe)
VIA:
David' osel ,anager
Kathy McClun ,Director of Community Development Services ~
Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner ~
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Follow-up to 2004 Comprehensive Plan Update, Puget Center Partnership Request
MEETING DATE:
May 2, 2005
I.
BACKGROUND
The 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments includes the following three components:
L
Puget Center Partnership Request - Request from the Puget Center Partnership to
change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.OJ.acres located north of
South 3121h Street and east of i $\ Avenue South from Professional Office (PO) to
Neighborhood Business (BN) (Exhibii 1).
2.
Housing Chapter Update - Update of "Chapter 5, Housing," of the Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan (FWCP).
3.
Kitls Corner Request - Request from Jon Potter to change the comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of approximately 46 acres located south of South 336th Street
arid west of Pacific Highway South from Business Park (BP) to Community Business
(Be) and Multi-Family (RM 2400).
The Puget Center Partnership Request and the Housing Chapter were presented to the LUTC òn April
18, 2005, and the Kitts Comer request is being presented to the LUTC this evening (May 2, 2005). At
the completion of the LUTC's discussion on the Puget Center Partnership request on April 18, 2005,
staff offered to come back to the LUTC with a recominendation. The March 30, 2005, Memorandum
to the LUTC is attached as Exhibit 2.
II. ; PROcEDnRAL~MARY
2/19105 Issumlce 'of Detennination of Non significance pursuant to the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA)' .
3/07/05 End of SEPA Comment Period
3/21105 End of SEP A Appeal Period
3/23/05 Public Hearing before the Planning CoIDnÚssión
4/18/05 Presentation toLUTC on Puget Center Partnership Request and Chapter 5, Housing
5/2105
Presentation to LUTC on Kitts Comer
Follow-up Presentation to LUTC on Puget Center Partnership Request
5/17/05 City Council Public Meeting
617/05
Second City Council Public Meeting and Adoption of Ordinance
III. LUTC DISCUSSION ONPUGET CENTER PARTNERSHIP REQUEST
Paul Benton, on behalf of the Puget Center Partnership, is requesting a change in the comprehensive
plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of South 3121h Street and east of I st A venue
South from Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN) (Exhibit 1). The Planning'
Commission held'a public hearing on March 23,2005, and recommended approval of the
comprehensive plan amendment and rezone from PO to BN based on a five to one (5-1) vote, on
condition that a deed restriction was placed on the property to prohibit bars, taverns, or cocktail
lounges on the site, as proposed by Me. Benton.
During the April 18, 2005, LUTC meeting, the LUTC discussed the preparation of a development
agreement for the site. The development agreement would prohibit certain uses on the site and an"
associated development plan would address light pollution, location of surface parking, and
compatibility of a grocery store or drug store with the neighborhood. In addition to those prohibited
uses recommended by the Planning Commission, the LUTC suggested prohibiting the following uses:
Fast-foodrestaunlnts
Car wash
Vehicle stations
Vehicle repair
Bar, tavern, or cocktail lounge
Group homes
Multi~family
Land Uselfransportation Committee
Follow-up to 2004 Comprehel1sive Plan Update
Puget Center Partnership Request
Meeting of May 2,2005
Page 2
IV ~ STAFF FOLLOW-Ur
Staff contacted the applicant, Mr. Paul Benton to discuss the proposed prohibited uses. Mr. Benton
was agreeable, except that he would like to see restaurants and uses such as Starbucks allowed.
The process forreview of a development agreement requires action by the Council to approve a
comprehensive plan designation of BN, based on a development agreement with direction on uses
and design of the site in order to be compatible with the sulTOunding neighborhood. The applicant
would then have to prepare a development plan that meets Council direction. The plan would be
reviewed by staff pursuant to the Staie Environmental Policy Act and compliance with Council
direction, and presented to the .Council ala future public hearing after a recommendation by the
LUTe. The development review process may take up to an additional six months. Altemati vely,
certain uses could be prohibited and design of the site conditioned through the comprehensive plan
amendment and rezone process. Conditioning the comprehensive plan amendment and rezone should'
achieve the same result as a development agreement '
V.
LAND USEITRANSPORT A TION COMMIITEE OPTIONS
The Committee has the following options:
1.
Recommend that the full Council adopt an ordinance approving the request by the Puget
Center Partnership to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres
located north of South 3121h Street and east of I $1 A venue South from Professional Office (PO)
to Neighborhood Business (BN), based on a development agreement and associated
development plan. '
¿ Recommend that the full Council adopt an ordinance approving the request by the
Puget Center Partnership to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres
located north Qf Sollth 3121b Street and east of 1st Avenue South from Professional Office (PO)
to Neighborhood Business (BN), based on a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone with
specific conditions related to allowable uses and design of the site.
2.
3.
Recommend that the full Council disapprove the request by resolution, retaining the
Professional Office (PO) comprehensive plan designation and zoning.
VI~ ÇOUNCIL ACTION
Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Article IX,"Process VI Revie~:' any
amendments to the comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan designations map, or wning text must
be approved by the City Council based on a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Per.
FWCC Section 22-541, after consideration of the Planning Conunission report, and at its discretion
holding its own public hearing, the City Council shall by majority vote of its total membership take
the following action: .
.1.
Approve the amendments by ordinance;
2. . ModifY and approve the amendments by ordinance;
Land.Useffransportation Committee
Follow41p to 2004 Comprehensive Plan U¡xIate
Puget Center Partnership Request
Meeting of May 2, 2005
Page 3
3.
'Disapprove the amendments by resolution; or
4.
Refer the amendments back to the Planning Conunission for further proceedings. Iflhis
occurs, the City CounCil shall specify the time within which the Planning Commission
shall report to the City Council on the amendments.
"
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
Vicinity Map -PugetCenter Partnership Request
March 30, 2005, Memorandum to the LUTC
1:\2004 Comprehensive Plao\2004 Update\LUTC\O50205 Pugel Ceol~ Partoersip SIaffReport 10, the UJTC.docI4I2612005 3:32 PM
Land UselTi3nsportation Committee
FolloW~up to 2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
Puget Center Pat1rtership Request
Meeting of May 2.2005
Page 4
')jST
sw 30m Sf
RS7.2
PO
I
57.2
~
RM1800
RS7.2
!/'
~
I-
!/'
..
N
. Requested Designation:
Comprehensive Plan:
Neighborhood Business
Zoning: BN
RM2400
NOte: This mep Is Intended for use u . graphicel repre$lnlalion only,
The City of Federal Wey makes no warl'8nty U /0 ils acicul'llCY.
22_0 200 400 600 6~O Feet ^
City of Federal Wa
Comprehensive Plan
2004
SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS
FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DESIGNATION CHANGES
Puget Center
Partnership
Site Specific Request
Key:
,I~.:~~~1: Steep Slopes
- Wetlands
- Site Requests
~
u.
J::lO
œ
-
:cw
><CJ
wif
EXHIBIT 2-
PAGE-LOF ~
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
March ,30. 2005
To:
Jack Dovey, Chair
Land Uselfransportation Committee (LUTe)
David M~ec ..
Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services ~
Margaret H. Clark. AICP, Senior Planner ~
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
MEETING DATE: April 18,2005
I.
BACKGROUND
The 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments includes the following three components:
I. Puget Center Partnership Request - Request trom the Puget Center Partnership to
change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of
South 31th Street and east of 1St AvenueSouth from Professional Office (PO) to
Neighborhood Business (BN) (ExhibiJ I).
2. Housing Chapter Update - Update or "Chapter 5, Housing," of the Federa/.Way
ÛJmprehensive Plan (FWÇP) (Exhibit 2). '
3. Kitts Comer Request - Request ftom Jon Potter to change the comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of approximately 46 acres from 'Business Park (BP) t9
Community Business (BC) and Multi-Family (RM 2400) (Exhibit 3). (This request
win be presented to the LUTC on May 2, 2005, and a staff report will be provided to
you approximately one week prior to the meetíng.) .
Attached are the following:
L Exhibit 4 - March 15,2005, Staff Report to Planning Commission with Exhibits A-F
.2. Exhibit 5 -March 23, 2005, Planning Co~ssion Minutes
II. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
2/19105 Issuance of Detennination of Nonsignifieancc pursuant to the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA) . ,
landIUse Tl7U\sportation Committee
2004 Compæ~ensjve Plan Update:
EXHIBIT .2. . .
. PAGE 2. OF -'-
3/07/05 End ofSEPA Comment Period
3121/05 End ofSEPA Appeal Period
3/23/05 Public Hearing before the Planning Commission
4/18/05 Presentation to LUTC on Puget Center Partnership Request and Chapter 5, Housing
511J05
Presentation to LUTC on Kitts Corner
5/17/05 City Council Public Meetin~
6n/05
Second City Council Public Meeting and Adoption of Ordinance
Ill. SITE-SPECIFIC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE
L
Background ~
[n September 2003, the City received one site-specific request for a comprehensive plan
amendment and rezone. Paul Benton, on behalf of the Puget Center Partnership, submitted a
request to amend the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.()3 acresJocated northof
. South 312* Street and east of 151: A venue South trom Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood
BusineSs (BN) (EXhibit I).
2.
Summary -
File Number:
Parcel No's: .
Location:
Size:
Applicant:
Owner:
Request
Existing
Comprehensive Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Requested
Comprehensive Plan:
Requested Zoning:
OO-104926'(){) UP
082104-9074,082104-9076 & 082104-9167
North of South 312111 Street and east of 1St Avenue South (Exhibi/6)
4.03ácre8.
Paul Benton on behalf of Puget Center Partnership
Same
Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning horn
Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN)
Professional Office
. Professional Office (PO)
Neighborhood Business
Neighborhood BusineSs (BN)
3.
Public Comments Received Prior to Planning Commission Public Hearing-
a)
Telephone call from Della Giesler, thepropertyowner at 140 South 3U*. Mi Giesler was
interested in obtaining more înfonnation about the request
b)
March 2,2005, entail from Greg Fewins, Deputy Director of Community Development
Semces. concerning telephone call trom Roddy Nolton (Exhibit 7). .
LandlUseTranspormtion Conunittt:e
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
March 30, 2005
Páge 2
EXHI,T. ..2. ..
, PAGE OF~
March 4, 2005, letter from Robert Roper, President, Mirror Lake Residents' As~¡ation
(Exhibit 8). .
c)
4.
Staff Recommendation -
Staff recommends that the Pugct Center Partnership request to change the comprehensive plan
designation and zoning trom Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN) be
granted. " ,
5.
Public Testimony Provided to Planning Commission ~
During the Planning Conunîssion public hearing, Bob Roper testified on behalf of the Mirror
Lake Residents' Association. He stated that the Association had a number of concerns (Exhibit
8), chief of which was the impact on Mirror Lake's water quality.
6.
Planning Commission Recommendation on Puget Center Partnership Request -
During the Planning Conunission hearing, the owner, Paul Benton, submitted a letter (Exhibit 9)
to the Planning Commission which stated that as a condition of receiving the BN comprehensive
plan designation and zoning, he would deed restrict the propeqy 1Ì'om being used as a bar,
I tavern, cocktail lounge, adult bookstore, adult video store, or other adult entçrtainme~t business,
and for the renting, leasing, or seUing óf any boat, motor vehicle, or trailer. The Planning
Coamnission recommended approval of the comprehensive plaÍumendment and rezone from
Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood (BN) based on a five to one{5~1) vote on condition
that the deed restriction was placed on the property (Exhibit 5). As. can be seen from the
following table, of the restricted uses proposed by Mr. Benton, only bar, tavern, or cOcktail
lounge is allowed i~ the BN zone.
Use NeighborhOod Business ProCessional' Orri~e
Office use X X'
Retail (grocery, produce, doJgs, peTsooal care,
books, liquae, hardware, garden. retail n~
stock, household goods, fumishings, clothing, X
variety, home electronics, sporting goods, works of
art) (40.000 SQ. ft. max) .
Bank & related fmancial service (40,000 sq. ft. X
max)
Retail providing laundry, dry cleaning, beauty! X
barber, video rental, shoe repair (40,000 SQ. ft. max)
Private lodge or club (10,000 sq. ft. max) X
Art gallery X
Restaurant or tavern (7,500 sq. fl max.) X
Fast food restaurant (5,000 sq. fl) X
Health Club (25,000 sq. ft. maX) X
Retail providing entertainment, recreational, or X
cultural services & activitieS (25,000 sq. tLmax)
Vehicle service station or car Wash X
Land/Use Transportation Committee:
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
March 30, 200S
Page 3
- --,"
Neighborhood Business .
Use Professional Office
.
Retail providing vehicle service or repair (within an X
enclosed buildinjÙ
School X X
Day care facility (except Class II home occupation) X X
. .
. Multi-unit (stacked) housing (not on the ground X
flood (18 dulacre)
b 1 X
Group orne Type II ~A
Gn>UP home Type II-B) X
Social services transitional housing.4 Type As X .
Soda! services transitional housing. Type B' X
Government facility X X
Public transit shelter X -X
.
Public utility X X
Public pack X X
Personal wireless service facility X X
Church X
EXHIBIT ~
PAGE-4--°F -A-
7.
Land Uselrransportation Committee Options ~-
The ComtTiÏttee has the following options:
1.
Recommend that the full Council accept the Planning Commjssion~s
, recommendation and adopt an ordinance approving the request by the Puget Center
Partnership to change the cOmprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located
north ofSouÍh.3121h Street and east of 1- Avenue SouthfTom Professiðnal.Office (PO) to
Neighborhood Business (BN)based on the recording of a deed restriction.
, Group home typC II means housing for juveniles ußder the jurisdïcrion of the criminal jU$tice system. Such groups inc/ude state-
licensed group cace homes or halfWay homes for juveniles who provide residence in lieu of sentencing or inèarceratìon, halfWay
houses providing residence '0 juveniles needing ci>rTectioo; or for those selected to participate in state--opecated work release and
pre-release programs.
2 Group homes 'we (I.A: Maximum number of 12 residents including resident staff.
) Group homes type 11-8: Thirteen or more residents including m;ideotiaf stat[ Maximum number det:enniried on a case-by--case basis.
4 Social servicetransitionaJ housing means facifities other ~an offices and group homes, opernted by a nonprofit social service
agency, licensed as required by the state, providing terriporaryand transitional housing '0 individuals on an as--n~ basis
including, but not limited to. emergency she/refS, homeless shelters, and other such crisis intervention facilities. This classification
inc(udes domestic violence shelters as defined herein, except that such shelters wherein the totalíllunber of residents does not
excee(¡'the maximum number aI/owed und~ the "fanùly" definition, maybe penniUed outright in all residential zones.
S Social service transitional housing TyPe A: Maximum number of residents to be-consistent with the maximum number of
unrelated adults allowed under the zoning definitiòn of family.. .
¡; Social service trnnsitional housing Type B: All social service transitional housing not meeting thedefinition of'1'ypc A,"
above. Maxinwm number dCterminedon a case~by-case basis.
The limitationon the númber of residents ñnocial service transitiðnal housing shall not be applied if it prohibits the City from
making reasonable accommodatioß$-tó disabled persons in order to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a
dwelling as !'Cquired by the Fair Housin~ 'Amendments Act or 1988,42 ÙSC 3604(f)(3)(b). , .
LandlUse Transportation Committee . March 30, 2005
2004 Comprehensive Plan UPdate ' Page 4
EXHIB,IT ¿
PAGE 5 -OF--L-
2
Recommend that the full Council. modifY the Planning Commission's
recommendation and adopt an ordinance approving the request by the Puget Center
Partnership to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located
north of South 312m Street and east of I It A venue South ITom Professional Office (PO) to
Neighborhood Business (BN) with no conditions.
3. Recommend that the full Council disapprove the request by resolution, retaining the
. Professional Office (PO) comprehensive plan designation and zoning.
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 5, HOUSING
L
Summary of Amendments -
In addition to new language, existing sections have been rearranged to improve the functioning
of the chapter. The following summarizes only substantive changes:
a)
Page Y-5. The section on CountyWide Policies,has been moved trom page V-3 to pageV-5
and revised to more clearly descrioo' the goals of the Countywide Planning Polices relating
to the provision of affordable housing.
b) Pages V-6- V-24. 5.2 Federal Way and its Housing- This section has been updàtèd based
. on different sources such as the 2000 Census. the April 2004 Office 0/ FiTlLUlcial-
Management Population Estimates, Northw~t Multiple Listing, and Dupre + Scot/.
c)
Page V-21. The Housing Capacity section has been revised to iØentify ways of increasing
capacity to meet the City's housing targets.
d)
Page V-22 - v-u. Language has been added to describe how zoning and development
regulations may be amended to encourage additional market housing,- and affordable and
special needs housing;
e)
Proposed changes to policies are summarized in the table on the f?llowing page.
f) .Pages V-38 - V39. 5.5 Implementation Actions has been deleted since it ÎSa duplication of
some of the policies. .
2.
Planning Commission Recommendation -
The Planning ColTU11Ïs$ion rec(uUßwnded approval of tile proposed changes to the Housing
Chapter with, the following two further amendments proposed by staff during the March 23,
2005, meeting (Exhibit 2): .
. a)
Replace the wording of the new HP15 as follows:
Modifyæaing and subdh'ÎsioR reguJationsto eæ>ure that land is used efficiently, that the
regula(iOJ1S rence( current safety needs, and that 'they permit and encourage eonstnføtioflof
a-breadJ'áHge ofho~ing types." ;
LandlUse Transportation Committee
2004 Comprdlcnsive Plan Update
- -
Marth 30. 2005
. . Pag~ 5
EXHIBIT a
PAGE -L-OF-L-
Iteview zoning. subdivision. and development fel!Ulations to ensure that they further
housing pOlicies and do. not create unintended barriers- This is of particular importa{lce for
small lot and cottage housin~ developments- In order to facilitate small lot and cottae:e
housing developments. it is particularly important to revise. as necessarY. the subdivision
and development re2Ulations that J!ovem their development.
b)
Delete Policy HP21because it is a duplicate of HP22.
!!m. Continue to protide inoen.ti"¡e5, suc-h íI5 density bonuseS, for providing aportioR of
- affordable housing in new developments-
HP22 Continue to provide incentives such as density bonuses for multi-family housinJ!.
and expand the types of incentives offered to encourage new developments to include
affordable housinR-
3.
Land Use/l'ransportation Committee Options -
The Committee has the following options:
l.
Recoimnend that the full Council accept the Planning Commission's
recommendation and adopt an ordinance approving the amendments to Chapter 5, Housing~
2.
Recommend that the full Council modify, then adopt the Planning Commission's
- recommendation by ordinance.
l.andIl1Se T l3nsportation Commi tree
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
. - March 30, 2005
Page 6
Increase Diversify Increase Encourage Provide for Address, Increase Encourage Improve.' Delete
Housing, HousIng Affordable Jnnovative Special Needs. Compatibility Open Space MIxed-Use Wording Policy
Capacity , 1{ousing Housing HousIng Between'Dlverse in ' Developments In -,
Housing DevelQpments Commercial
Areas
Amend Amend Amend Amend Amend new HP38 Add new HP13 Add new Amend new HP 18 New Delete
existing existing newHP3 existing HP19 HPS existing
HPl BPI HPI , Policy HP2
Add new Add new Add. new Add new HP39 New Delete
HP14 HPlS HP21 HP12 existing
- HP14.
Include
language in
newHP17
Amend Add new Amend Amend new HP41 New Delete
newHP17 HP17 new HP2S HP20 exisrlng
" HPlS
- Add new Amend 1'lew HP43 New Delete
HP26 HP24 existing
HP19.
Include
language in
new'HP 21.
Amend Delete exisring New Delete
, new HP27 HP38 & HP40 HP34 existing
Add language to HP38
new HP4S to
address these
!loneies
Add new New Delete
; HP28 HP3S ,exisring
r HP40
Amend, -
new HP32 "
LandlUse Transportation Comrmttee
2004 Comprehensive PJan Update
March 30, 2005
Page 7
~m
~~~-
m
.~
~
o.
F
MEETING DATE:
May.l?,2005
ITEM# 7// !-
(e,)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Amendments to Chapter 5, Housing
§5~;~~s=ss-B ~~r~G ~~~f -~ -
-,-_..,,-.'.~'----."_"-'_m,.-..._m.~'___.._m__-. --
.................___m______m'_._...._'___m__m__'_' .'---
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Draft Adoption Ordinance with Exhibit A; 2) March 30, 2005, Memorandum to the Land Use!
Transportation Committee (LUTC) with Exhibits 2, 4, and 5. Please note that due to its bulk, Exhibit 2 [Housing Çhapter Amendments
presellted to the LUTCf and Exhibit B of 4 [Housing Chapter Amendments presented to the Planning CommissionJ are not included In the City
Council packet, but is available in the City Council Conference Room).
.SüMMARy7iiACKGRöUÑri:-F~de-;~l-W~y ~d~pted its Comp~h~mivë'i;i~~'i~N'~~~;be~mÓf 199'5, and atri~nded th~pi~ i~_mm .
December of 1998, September 2000, November 2001, March 2003, and July 2004. Pursuant to RCW36.70A.130, the Growth
Management Act (GMA) limits plan updates to no more than once per year, except under certain circumstances. The 2004
Comprehensive Plan amendments include three separate actions: a request by Jon Potter for a comprehensive plan amendment and
rezone for Kitts Comer; a request by the Puget Center Partnership for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone; and proposed
amendments to Chapter 5, "Housing," of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. The three actions are being considered on separate
agenda bíI1s with separate ordinances, but will be acted upon simultaneously to amend the comprehensive plan in order to comply
with RCW 36.70A.130. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to Chapter 5, "Housing" on
March 23,2005, after which it recommended approval of the proposed amendments to the City Council.
-CiTY '~COUÑCiL"."'CÕMMíTTEE'--"RËCÒMMENDÃ TIÕN:'-Th~'-'--LUTC-"di~'c~~d'--the Pl~~g--'Co~s~io~;;
recommendations during a public meeting on April 18, 2005, after which it recommended approval of the Planning Conunission's
recommendations to the City Council.
-'__m...___'.,...-..-"'" .-.- ......-....-..,-....., _.-.-mm..-- ~.....__._.._,_m'-'m-.'--._'---_._'--_.._..,..-_m .,_.......__..m..--..m m_m.m_..-..m'_..-_..--"'.,,-,-,. ,.----,......--.m.____....-.,
PROPOSED MOTION: "1 move approval of the ordinance adopting amendments to Chapter 5, "Housing," of the Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan and enactment on Junè 7, 2005."
~~-;~.-
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLEDIDEFERREDfNO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
37~
Revised - ostl 01200 1
1:\2004 Comprehensive Plan\2oo4 Update\City Council\Housing Chapter CC Cover Agenda,doc/05tlO12oo5 10:29 AM
ORDINANCE NO.
DRAFT
5/Í'Yö s-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL
WAY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S
GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AMENDING
CHAPTER 5, HOUSING (AMENDING ORDINANCE NO'S. 90~43, 95-248,
96M270, 98~330, -00-372,01-405,03-442, 04-460, 04~461, 04-462).
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act of 1990, as amended, (Châpter 36.70A RCW or "OMA")
requires the City of Federal Way to adopt a comprehensive plan which includes a land use elen1ent (including a
land use map), housing element, capital facilities plan element, utilities element, and transportation element
(including transportation system map[s]); and
WHEREAS, the GMA also requires the City of Federal Way to adopt development regulations
implementing its comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted its comprehensive plan with land use màp (thè
"Plan") on November 21, 1995, and adopted development regulations and a zoning map implementing the
Plan on July 2, 1996; and subsequently amended the comprehensive plan, land use map, and zoning màp on
December 23, 1998, September 14,2000, November 1,2001, March 27,2003, and July 20,2004; and .
WHEREAS, the City may consider Plan and development regulation amendments pursuant to Article
lX, Chapter 22 of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC); and
WHEREAS, under RCW 36.70A.130, the Plan and development regulations are subject to continuing
review and evaluation, but the Plan may be amended no more than one time per year; and
WHEREAS, the Council shall be considering three separate actions to amend the comprehensive plan,
all of which will be acted upon simultaneously in order to comply with RCW 36.70A.130; and
WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 05M -' approving a change in comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of South 312m Street and east of 1 st Avenue South from
Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN), based on specific conditions as contained in
Ordinance No. 05-~; and
ORD#
,PAGE 1
WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 05-_, approving a change in comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of approximately 46 acres located south of South 336m Street and west of Pacific
Highway South from Business Park (BP) to Community Business (Be) and Multi-Family (RM 2400), based
on specific conditions as contained in Ordinance No. 05-_; and
WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 05-----, amendments to Chapter 5, "Housing," oftbe
Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, in order to update housing- and population-related information and continue to meet
provisions of the GMA and the King County Countywide Planning Policies, Chapter 5, "Housing," of the
Federal Way Comprehensive Plan is being amended as necessary; and
WHEREAS, in February 2005, the City's SEP A Responsible Official issued á Determination of
..
Nonsignificance on the 2004 comprehensive plan amendments, which included the proposed amendments to
Chapter 5, "Housing," of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; and
, ,
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way, through its staff, Planning Conunission, City Council conunittees,
and full City Council has received, discussed, and considered the testimony, written comments, and material
from the public, as follows:
1. The City's Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to Chapter 5,
"Housing," of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan on March 23, 2005, after which it
recommended approval of the proposed amendments; and
2. The Land Use/Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered the
proposed amendments on April 18,2005, following which it recommended approval to the full
City Council; and
3. The full City Council considered the matter at its meetings on May 17, 200S, and June 7, 200S;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to approve the proposed amendments to Chapter 5, "Housing," of
the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan.
ORD#
, PAGE 2
Now, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, does hereby ordain as
follows:
Section 1. . Findings.
A. The proposed amendments to Chapter 5, "Housing," ofthe Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as
set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, provides policies for a diverse range of housing, including affordable
1
housing, that is compatible with neighborhood character and meets the City's design guidelines, and will,
therefore, benefit the neighborhood, City, and region, while also meeting the adopted housing targets, and
bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; is in the best interest of the residents of the
City; and is consistent with the requirements ofRCW 36.70A, the King County Countywide Planning Policies,
and the unamended portion of the Plan.
B. The proposed amendment to Chapter 5, "Housing," of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as
set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, will not negatively affect open space, streams, lakes, or wetlands, or the'
,.'
physical environment in general. The amendments will allow for growth and development consistent with the
Plan's overall vision and with the Plan's land use element household and job projections. The amendment,
th~refore, bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; is in the best interest of the
residents of the City; and is consistent with the requirements ofRCW 36.70A, the King County Countywide
Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the Plan.
Section 2.
Comprehensive Plan Amendments Adoption.
The 1995 City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter amended in 1998,2000,2001,2003, and 2004, copies of which are on file
with the Office of the City Clerk, hereby are and shall be amended as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto.
Section 3. Amendment Authority. The adoption of Plan amendments in Section 2 above is pursuant
to the authority granted by Chapters 36.70A and 35A.63 RCW, and pursuant to FWCC Section 22-541.
Section 4. SeverabilitY. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The
invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity
ORD#
, PAGE 3
of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the
ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 5. Savings Clause. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter
amended in 1998, 2000, 2001, 2003, and 2004 shall remain in force and effect until the amendments thereto
become operative upon the effective date of this ordinance.
Section 6. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this
ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after
its passage, approval, and publication, as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this
,2005.
day of
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Mayor, Dean McColgan
;. ,. ,
A TIEST:
City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO:
1:\2004 Comprehensive Plan\2004 Update\City Council\Housing Chapter Adoption Qrdinance.doc/5tlOl2005 10:43 AM
ORD#
, PAGE 4
EXHIBIT A
TO
ADOPTION ORDINANCE
CHAPTER FIVE - HOUSING
5.0
INTRODUCTION
This chapter ,vas preparedia eoojunetioa with the Land Use øhapter ofilie Pederal WilY
CømprchC$8ivo Plan (FWCP). Together they provide a holistic 'lie','.' ofho'N housing
stoak may be expanded and improyed to meet the City'shousiRg needs over the next 20
years. The emphasis of this øbapter is on preserving the high quality of existing
residential neighborhoods while impnwiag housing opportunities for low inoome
families and persons with special housmg needs. These housing needs were identified in
Ii Housing Needs Assessment, '.Yhioh the City ~ompleted in the Fall of 1993, and are
summarized in this chapter.
The Gro>.vth Management :\ot (GMA) requires that housing issues be addressed in both
the Land Use and Housing chapters. To gain a full picture oillow new hoùsÍ:ng 'Hill be
provided in Federal '.\Tay, both ohapters should be read. As a general rule, the Land Use
ehapter describes ','{hat densities will be permitted in the various neighborhoods of the
City and makes recommendations fOf how nevI residential neighborhoods should be
desigaed so that they ar-e a positiye addition to the community. The Housing chapter
foouses on the demand for nevI housing, the Rv!iilability of a range of housing types and
styles, and on the housing needs of low and moderate income families, special needs
populations, and the homeless.
This Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) Housing chapter. together with the Land
Use chapter. is perhaps the most personal components of the comprehensive plan. Their
policies affect the immediate environment in which residents live and raise their families.
The primary goal of the Housing chapter is to create high quality neighborhoods that
meet Federal Way's current and future housing needs for all economic groups and
household types. It does this by preservin.g existing neighborhood character while also
encouragin~ the development ofa wide range of housing tyþes. The Land Use chapter
determines the location and densities of that new housing. .
The availability of diverse housing: choices and affordable housing for all income groups
is essential to a stable. healthy. and thriving community. Most housing is not built by
. cities. but by the private sector. However. cities and other entities. such as lending
institutions. do impact the supply and affordability of housing. This chapter focuses on
the housing supply and affordability factors that the City can either control or influence.
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
5.1
Re uirements of the Growth Mana ement Act
Washington State Growth Management Act
The GMA requires cities to, "...encourage the availability of affordable housing to all
economic segments of the population and to promote a variety of residential densities and
housing types." It also encourages "preservation of existing housing stock." The GMA
discourages conversion of undeveloped land, "...into sprawling, low-density
developments" (RCW 36.70A.020, 1990 Supp.).
The GMA requires that the Housing chapter include:
.
An inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing needs.
.
Astatement of goals and policies for housing preservation, improvement, and
development. .
.
Identification of sufficient land area for the number of needed housing units,
including government assisted housing, housing for low income families,
mobile/manufactured housing, multiple family housing, and special needs
housing. This defines the amount ofland that the City must designate for housing
in the Land Use chapter.
.
A strategy and policy for meeting the housing needs of all economic segments of
the conununity.
.
Encouragement for innovative land use management techniques to enhance
affordable housing opportunities, including density bonuses, cluster housing,
planned unit developments, and transfer of development rights.
Affordable Housing Inventory
l\. 1993 legislative amendment requires that all eities and publie ageneies develop an
invmtory ofp1:tblic properties no longer needed fer l:ise and \vRieh may be available for
afførd&àIe housing. The im'entory is to identify iadiv:idüal!*,operty looations, size, and
ourrent zoning eategory. Public agmeies inelude all sehool districts a-nd the state
departments efÞTatIHal ResoUf'ees, Transportatioa, Social and Health Serviees,
Corrections, aftd Gmeral AdministFatiea. The inventory is pre';ided to the 'N ashiflgton
Offiee of Community Deyelopment (OCD) afld is te be 1:!fIdated ammally by No';ember 1.
The inventory is ayailable from OCD Up0Fl .written req1:1est (RCW 35.21.687).
Accessory Dwelling Units
The City is required by the state Housing Aot of 1993 to include provisioFls for accessory
housing. To allo\'; local flexibility, the pro'lisions are subject to such regulations,
Revised 200:! 2005
V-2
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
conditions, and limitations as detormineà by the City Council CRCW 1\..63.230). Consistent
with the Eldoption ohhe FWCP in 1995, the City prepared and adopted lloeessory dwelling
unit pro'lisions consistent with the state's ffiafldllt-e.
Multi County Policies
In response t{) the GMA, the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) adopted regieaal
housing poliaies. These policies promot-e fair housing access to all persons regardless of
race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, age, n&tiefl&l origin, family status, SO1:1:£oe
ofiHeomo, or disability. Policies seek to strengthen interjurisàiotional efforts for fair
distribution of low and moderate ineome, and spocial Reeds housing.
P8RC policies seek to proyide a diversity of housing types to meet the needs of all
economic segments of the population. Jurisdictions should premete aooperati'/e efforts to
enSl:1:Fe that an adequate supply of housing is a'.<ailable throughout the region. Each
jurisdietion should ':lork at preserviHg e-xisting affordable housing stock andpro'¡jding
a:ceess to publie transit for the residents in such housing. Polieies promote development
of iastitutiOflal and financial mechanisms to proviàe Reusing near community eenters.
They also efloow:age eonsideration of the eeeHemio impact of regulations and
development of regulations that do not burden the east of housing development and
maintenance.
Countywide Policies
In 1991, King County adopted Countyvtide Planning Poliøies CCWPPs) for afforœble
housing that promote a "rational and equitable" distribution of affQrdable heusing. The
policies establish numerieal Rousing targets fRat each eity should aoooffiß1:odate and
speeifia tBt"gets for housing affordable to heHseholds earning less than 80 percent of the
Cmmty's median family income. Loeal aetions to encourage development øfaffordable
Musing ma-y include, but are not limited to, providing sufficient land zoned for higher
housing densities, revision of development standards and pennitting procedures,
reviewing eodes for redundancies and ineoflsistefloies, and pro'¡jding opportunities for a
range of housing types. .^.dditionally, aUjurisdiotiOfls should participate in a aooperatiye,
countywide effort to address oummt low iHeome Rousing needs. Initially, this effort will
inelude identifying a eountywide funding se\:1fee and eountywide programs to address
housing neeàs that cross jurisdiotioftal boundaries and benefit from aountywide
application.
Other eountywide housing policies require jurisdictions to evaluate e1tisting subsidized
and low cost housing resources, and identify such Rousing that ma-y be lost due to
rede';elopment, deteriorating Rousing conditions, er publie policies or aetiom~.
Jurisdiotions should develop strategies te preserve existing low income housing and
provide reloeation assistance to households that may be displaced due to public action.
Fer jurisdictions such as Federal Way, which have elected to han an urban center, the
CWPPs pfO'lide that the center be planned to accommodate a minimum of 15 dwelling
units per aero.
Revised 2002 ZQQ2
V-3
FWCC - Chapter Five. Housing
i\.l1jurisdiotions shm:lld monitor and report on various 8speets of residential de'/elopment
withm their communities. They should defifle æmuaI targets for ho\:lsmg deveIopmoot
and preservation, and traek progress in aehieving countywide and loeal goals for housing
all eeonomie segments of the population. The eomty's Gro.....th Management FlaMing
Council (GMPC) is charged with determining whether development ofhousiag for all
eeonomie segments of the population is satisfying housing needs. If new housing falls
short ef meeting the eountyHide need for housiRg, and partieuIarly affordable Rm:1sing,
the GMPC may recommend additional aetions.
Implications for the Housing Chapter
In sUl11m:8t)', based upon the foregoing la'Ns and policies, Federal Way's Housing ekapter
should inelude an in'lentory of existing aeusing stock; idefttify housing needs, and set
minimum housiflg targets for each eeonoæie segment ef the populatiofl; provide fur
suffieient, appropriately zoned lQRd to meet these needs; and identify appropriate goals,
policies, and strategies for aehieviag these housmg targets. Tools for aehievmg these
goals may iaelude amendments to the zoniRg chapter of the P-cdcysl Wsj' City Gada
(FWCC) to eneoW"age a more dÎ'lersified Rousing stock, promote imaginative design, and
ene01:l:fage development of affordable aeusing. 8trategies may alse include provisions for
interjuriswetional efforts to provide and fmaneeafførdaÐle housing. The primary
objective should be to ereate rt)sidentiaI neighborhoods \vhioR are of high quality, provide
social and eommunity support and ffieet the Reeds of all segments of soeiety.
Existing Conditions
IntrøduetioB
Federal Way has grøv:n rapidly in the past. The area àoubled in population dwing the
1960s and again in the 19&Os. 8inae its inc9rperation iR 1990, the City has grO'Wfl by 23
percent. Based 0f1 P8RC forecasts, when the itweatory af vaelmt land is eonsumed,
g£a'Nth will slow dOYItl eonsiàerably. .
,^Jtheugh hol:lseholds are generally more af:fæeat in Federal Way than in Bearhy
eommunities, home priees are fairly Ø"leR tflral:lghout 80uth King County. The King
Couaty Offiee of Regional Pehey and Planning reports that in the first three quarters of
2001, the average single family house price in Federal Way was $213,Q60, aompared to
$222,580 in Kent, $216,549 in f\l:lburn, and $207,302 iB Des Momes.
The 8eaUte Everett Rea-} Estate Researah Report reparts that in the Fall of 290 1, the
median reRt for a two bedroom/one bath apartnumt was $703 ia Federal Way, $714 iR
Kent, $676 in .\I:lburn, and $689 ia Des Moines. In cempanson, the median rent for a two
bedroom/one bath apartment was $1,100 in 8eattle, $1,182 in Bellevue, $88(j in Redmond
Revised ~ 2005
V4
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
($986), and $977 in Issaquah. This demonstrates that South King County has more
afførdable refttal housing available tflaR the rest of the "owty.
Population
The 2000 CeRsusßhov/s t8at compared to King County, Federal Way had a larger
pereefltage of children under 17 years old (28 pereent compared to 22 per-veRt ia the
County).
On the øth:er hand, only eight peroeflt of the Federal Way population. ,vas 65 or elder in
2000, oompared to 10 percent in King County. However, it is eKpeeted that the number of
elderly ...1411 inerease in Federal Way due to the natüral agiflg of the popwati9ß:, seniors
tending to relocate to Federal 'Nay in seareh of affordable housing, and the large number
of senior hoNGing ooits being built in Federal Way. Senior eiti~ens require S1:l00 services
as lieme delivered meals, respite care serviees, recreation serviees, in home care,
eongregate aad nursing eare faeilitiøs, Imd transporta.-tiøn. Figure V 1 (page 5) describes
the 2000 distribution of Federal ',},'ay's pop1:l1ation.
[The following figure will be replaced by a new Figure V-I (page 7).]
. Fiçu~y! VI.
Feder,,1 Way Ace DistrIbution bY PoøulatioR
in JOO )
30000
25000
20000
15000
1ÖÒ'00
5000
0
Under 20-34 35-54 55--64 65-74 Over 75
20
goitre!!: 2QOQ CI!ftGUS
CountyWide Policies
The Countywide Planning; Policies (CWPPs), required by GMA. both confinn and
supplement the GMA. The CWPPs for affordable housing promote a "rational and
equitable" distribution of affordable housing. They require that jurisdictions do the
followinlZ regarding housing:
.
Provide for a diversity of housing types to meet a variety of needs and plan for
housing opportunities for all economic segments of the population.
.
Consider the need for proximity to lower wage employment. access to
transportation and human services. and the adequacy of infrastructure to support
housing development when planning for housing affordable to low and
moderate-income households.
Revised ~ 2005
V-5
FWCC - Chapter Five. Housing
.
Develop strategies to preserve existing low-income housing and provide
relocation assistance to households that may be displaced due to public action.
where feasible.
. Evaluate existing subsidized and low cost housing resources and identify such
housing that may be lost due to redevelopment. deteriorating housing conditions.
public policies or actions.
.
Participate in cooperative. countywide efforts to address current low income
housing needs.
The policies also establish numerical housing targets that each city should accommodate
as well as svecific targets for housing affordable to households earning less than 80
percent of the county's median family income. The numerical housing target for Federal
Way is discussed in the Future Housing Growth section of this chapter. The overall
targets for low and moderate-income housing are described below.
. Seventeen percent of new housing units should be affordable to households
. between 50 and 80 percent of median income. .
" ".. .
.
Twenty percent of new housing units should be affordable to households below
50 percent of median income. (Jurisdictions that had relatively less existing
affordable housing were required to have 24 percent of new housing be
affordable to this income group.)
The CWPPs also suggest local actions to encourage development of affordable housing.
These may include. but are notlimited to. providing sufficient land zoned for higher
housing densities. revision of development standards and pennitting procedures.
reviewing codes for redundancies and inconsistencies. and providing opportunities for a
range of housing types.
5.2
FEDERAL WAY AND ITS HOUSING
Federal Way. like most communities. has residents with a range of incomes. ages. and
household types. The size and tv?e of housing needed by Federal Way residents have
been changing due to a number of factors. such as the influx of new immigrants. the
increasing number of people living alone. the rising number of single-parent households.
and increasing life span. Federal Way's housing opportunities must accommodate all of
the various types and cost of housing needed by its residents.
Revised :!002 2005
V-fJ
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
Household and Population Trends
Federal Way's population growth has slowed down since the 1980s when its population
doubled. According to the Census. from 1990 to 2000 Federal Way has grown
approximately 23 percent. This is greater than King County's growth rate of 15 percent.
but less than some of its neighboring cities.
Population by Áee
The age of a city's population is an important indicator of housing need. Different types
of housing: are needed at various sta¡z;es of people's lives. Federal Way's citizens are
relatively voung. Over half of its oopulation is under 35 years of age: almost one-third of
this group is under 18 years of age. This statistic reflects a City with many young families
and individuals. many of whom may need rental housing as well as firsHime homeowner
opportunities. It is the residents between the ages of25 and 35 that represent the majority
of potential first-time homeowners. Federal Way must provide entry-level homes for this
existing and future population i[they are to remain in the community. TYpicallv. first
time homebuyeropportunities are in the form of smaller single-family homes.
townhouses. and condominiums.
25,000
Figure V-1
Federal Way's PoÞulation by Aae
)
g. 20,000
)
~ 15,000
0
¡ 10,000
.a
§ 5,000
z
0
5 and 6-17 18-24 25-35 36-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85 and
under older
Age
Source: 2000 Census
Smaller sized ownership units and rental housing are needed not only by this younger
population. but by seniors as well. Seniors often desire smaller and more affordable
housing. both ownership and rental. in order to minimize or eliminate yard work!
housework and to expend less of their fixed incomes for housing. Of course. these types
of housing are also ideal for the growing number of single person households, as well as
for many of the rising number of single parent headed household. regardless of age.
Seniors make up only eight percent of Federal Way residents. less than King County's
percentage often. However, countywide. both the number of elderly and its proportion of
the senior population is expected to increase by20l0 and increase more dramatically by
2025 as the baby boomer generation ages.
Revised 2002 ZQQ§
V-7
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
Household Income
Understanding the distribution of Federal Way's household income is also critical in
planning for its future housing needs. A household's income dictates its housing,
decisions and opportunities. The King County Benchmark Program defines in.come
groups as follows:
Extremely Low Income:
Very Low Income:
¥-ePj Low Income:
Law Moderate Income:
Median Income:
Middle Income:
Upper Income:
30%
Ü ~ 30% of county median income
31-50% of county median income
51-80% of county median income
100%
81-120% of county median income
120% or more of county median income
King County's 1999 median ifloome [.or all oowseholds vias $53,157, eompared to Fedend
"Way's medioo income of$19,27&. More speoifieally, the 2000 H.U.D. Ineome Le'/eIs by
Household Sioo for Var1O1:1S iaoome groups are shmvn b-y household size in Table V I
(page 6).
While Federal Way households are generally more affluent than else'.vher~ in South King
County, abowt 1,390 households in the City of Fedeml Way are currently receiving
housing ,assistance from the King County Housing Authority, or living in subsidiøed
priyate housing. '.. .
According to the 2000 Census. Federal Way;s median household income was $49.278.
which is less than King County's median 0[$53.157; but more than the South King
County cities'! median income 0£$45.850. Federal ~aY's income groups are distributed
in approximately a 60:40 split; with 60 percentofresidents with middle and greater
incomes and 40 percent with moderate and lesser incomes.
Figure'V~2
Households By Income level
Very Low
Middle and Upper 11% L
58% ~1~~
. Moderate
19%
Source: 2000 Census
I The South King County cities used in this comparison are Auburn. aurie". Des Moines. Kent. Federal Way. I
Nonnandv Park. Renton. SeaTac. and Tukwila.
Revised ~ ~
V-8
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
Household Size
Federal Way has the largest average household size in South King County at 2.63. It is
well above the King County average of2.39 per household. However. as for most cities.
Federal Way consists predominately of one and two person households. as the fi!!Ure
below shows. Three reasons for Federal Way's relatively large average household size is
its large percentage (67.6 percent) of families. its relatively high number of immigrants
(who tend to have large families), and the overcrowding of its housing due to
affordability and availabilitY issues.
Figure V- 3
Distribution of Households by Size in Federal Way, 2000
5+ People
11%
1 Person
25%
4 People
15%
2 People
32%
3 People
17%
Source: . 2000 Census "
Overcrowdinf!
Accordin!! to the 2000 Census. almost eight percent of Federal Way's housing is
overcrowded. Overcrowding. defined by HOD as having more than one person per room
in a housing unit. is more ofa problem in Federal Way than in King County or on
average in South King County. although the South King Countvcities of Kent. SeaTac.
and Tukwila have a worse problem with overcrowdinl!. Overcrowding typically results
when households have to "double up" in order to afford the cost of housing. or nom large
families not being able to find an appropriately sized unit.
Special Needs Populations
There are many people in Federal Way who need housing that is directly linked to
supportive services and/or is designed to accommodate physical disabilities. The private
market. for the most part. does not meet the housin!! and service needs of these grOUps.
especially if they are low-income. However. the need is independent ora person's
income; it is experienced due to a crisis or disablin!! condition. Although most who are
disabled on a pennanent basis. due to the limitations of their disability. usually become
very low-income.
Revised ~ 2005
V-9
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
Special needs populations and their needs are diverse. Some groups require special needs
housinl! for a limited time and others on a pennanent basis. Two examples of housing
needed on a pennanent basis are !!roup homes by some developmentallY disabled adults
and apartments with supportive services for the chronicallv mentally ill. The type of
housing that is needed on a temporary basis includes confidential shelters and transitional
housinl! for victims of domesticyioIence. supportiye housing for pre¡mant teens. and
emerl!ency shelters and transitional housing for the homeless.
Special needs populations require two maior in!!redients to ensure a stable housinl!
situation: very low cost housinlZ and supportive services. The type and number of
supportive services required varies by population and by individuals within each
population. Jurisdictions can help encouralZe an adequate supplv of special needs housing
by ensurinl! that its codes and relZulations are not barriers to the provision of special
needs housing throughout the City.
Employment
During the 1980s, Federal V/a-y's emp10Yffleat base grew faster thtm any other soourÈlan
area of Kmg Catmty. This gro\vth was primltfily in retail aad service jabs aad by 1991,
more than one third of Federal Way's employmeRt base ".'as in retail sales, follov/ed
alaseIy by service employment. The! 999 Ccntral Pftget Smmd Raglansl E-œ1'lomic
Report Employment P{!lUern and TFC/'lås, 1995 !998reports that ia Federal Way, jabs
covered by SoaiaI Sec1:lrity grew from 23,800 in 1995 to 27,820 in 1998, aaiaerease of
17 perceat. This sttidy also reports that there were less thtm 400 high tecl:æalogy jobs in
1998. However, Between 1995 and 1998, retail seater jabs iRcreased ß-om 6,650 to 7,710,
a 16 peraeat increase. But between 1998 tmd 2000, retaiIjoÐs increased aBly by six
percent while all ce'.<ered employmem iaereased by 13 percent from 27,820 to 31,315.
Federal Way is more a source forworkers than a place to work. accordinlZ to the Puget
Sound Regional Council's œSRC) Location of Jobs and People in Central Puget Sound.
1999. There are 30.012 jobs in Federal Way. accordim! to another PSRC study. Covered
Employment Estimates (or 2002. This is not enough to employ Federal Way's
approximately 60.000 potential workers alZed 18 or older. This low ratio of people to jobs
is why Federal Way is considered a bedroom community. Approximately 70 percent of
those 30.012 jobs were in the retail and service sector. Jobs in I!overnment and education
accounted for the next hilZhest percentalZe with almost 13 percent.
Federal Way's proportion of retail jobs is twice the regional average. Jobs in retail sales
and service employment typically pay low wages and as a result, these workers have
difficulty finding housing they can afford despite working full time jobs. Accordingly,
there may be an imbalance between jobs available in Federal Way and the earnings
needed to afford local housing. Ironically, this may result in employees working in the
City commuting from other communities where cheaper housing is available and higher
wage earners who live in Federal Way commuting to other cities for higher paying jobs.
Revised ~ ZQQ§
V-10
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
Table V 1
...nnn T.T TT n ~ T .1. ~~ co,'
.
-, -, ! ~ ¡p ;J 4
Extremely Law IReame (3Q% afmedian) ~ m,goo m,:m ~ ~
.'\fferda ¡le HSG Payment*** ~ ~ $WJ $3-1() $4H
Affer-dable Rent ~ ~ $4W $444 $494
;\ff{)rdable Hatlse Priees**** $44¡400 $W¡&OO $£;900 ~ ~
Veri Law Income (SO%, ofmeåian) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Afferdable HSG P~eRt $4&G $M& ~ $M+ ~
.\fferàable Rent ~ $6&8 $é99 $+<W $8U
,\ffurdable House Priees .$+4;lOO ~ $&9;OOQ ~ $lOS,800
Low Ineome (80% ofmeåian) ** ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Afferàable HSG Payment ~ $&Jé $&&9 $9G ~
Afferàa ¡le Rent $3+9 $l-¡OO4 ~ ~ ~
Affordable Hattse Priees WJ,OO $129,IQQ $137,2QQ $14S,300 $Hil,100
MeàianInGome (1O0~{' of median) $4é¡OO() ~ ~ ~ $M;8OO
Affordable HSG Payment $9(jO U;Q% ~ $+;m $+;m
Affordable Rent $+;-I-B $+-;lli $t,39& ~ ~
f.ffeFàable HeYse Priees $118,200 $H¡9,lQQ $179,700 $190,300 $211,SOO
U¡;Iper IHeome (120~{. of Median) ~ ~ M;G8G S+t-¡Q4G $1&,9@
AffeFàable HSG Payment $+;-I-B $+-;lli $t,39& ~ ~
Affon.lable Rent ~ M;m $¥H+ $-l--,m $+¡9.14
Af.feFdable Hayse Priess $177,800 UQ2,900 $2IS,GOO $228,100 $2S3,800
S&ttRet
The 2991 KiRg CellRl)' BeRehæarl¡ ~peft pllhlí"aked ~y the K4RgCeliRty Offiae efR-egieRal PBliBY aRd PlaRRiRg.
NtKesi
*SiRee the aveNge KC HBllsekeld is ahellt 2.1 peRieRs, tflis salllffIß Bj!preKimete5 t-lle medioo wrell kollsek¡jlds iR tfle BelIRt)'o
**Bßi!allse ae tfle way HUD 6alelllatðs tflis iRBall'le le\'el, it is aBft¡ø.l1y 76% of tfle Meàj¡1R maeff!e fQtfler tflBII 8Q%, altflallgk it
is sailed L8Q.
***Afl ø.f'furd,",le helisiRg Pftj'ffieRt is 25% efmenthly ¡Reeme. Afferdahle rant ¡s39% afll'leRlfily ¡Reeme.
****Ths afford,",le kall'le 'IRSS is h )Ssd eR ø. 30 YBø.r fho:sd mertgage ø.t 7.25~<' iRterest v..41fi S% dawR.
I) The 1999 City of Federal Wily]{¡¡mæt 8e,.".;- Cømprehensiw: PJa/l defines aft afierd,",l!! holiSiRg Ð Jportllßity aHeRta
effeFd,",le to Iteusekelds earniRg less tltooSQ% eell'lodiaR iReame.
2) for rentals, 00 affardable mentkly p&yHIeRt is defined as ø. kelisiRg eestlfaymeRt that is ne mere tkllft 39% af ø. kallsskeld's
II'IØRtflly iRsame. This daes Rat iRBll1ds ø. dedllBtiaR for ut4lities; it ø.S51111'10S thllt the entire 'Ia)'R'leRt gees tewl\fd lfie relit.
6!1l1l1'1 !le: SQ% efmediaft ¡Reeme fer a three persoRkolisekeld WIIS :1:29,699 iR 2900. At this ¡Reeme, the family eoliid afford
t71Q iR 1'I!Rt.
3) The !99!J C;I}' 9/,S2il2MI WHY HflW/4/'I 8eM';ee!; C(lrnpFChensiw) Plan defines aR ø.fferd,",ls e'l.'RefSltip Ð Jpertllnity )S priess
efferd,",le tØ Itellsekelds eamiRg leas lfiaft ggq, af II'IsdillR iRGome.
1) fer ltaIl'lSB\\'RSfShi 'l, ø.R afferdahle monthly payment is defined as ø. kelisiRg east/payment tflat is nB mere tflan 25~{' of e
lteliseltBld's II'IBRlfily iRÐOII'IS. Th¡s lellVes 3% efißsell'l!! fer taxes 8.IId iRsllfllRee.
5) A-¡¡ affard,",l!! Itame 'IRee is a 'l 'lraJlimatsly three times tile ooßualltelisekeld iReoll'le. .'\n RQ% afmsdillR ¡Rseme fer ø. tflree
parseR Itellseltold was $15,200 iR 2000. At lfiis iRBaft'ls, lIte f_By soliid affetd to purekase altall'le BastiRg Ra ft'Iers tkllR
$115,300.
To illustrate some oftflese poiflts, Table V 2 provides examples of2001 Hol:lsiHg Priees
in King CO1:lRty, the iFleome req1:lired to purchase these ho1:lses, RFld eRRmples of typical
oee1:lpatioFls with required earning po'Ner. EveFl tho1:lgh these examples are not specifia to
Federal Way, they deffiollstrate it ""ould be diffio1:lIt for IH'l employee ill the serviee or
retail seatoI' to purehase IH'l Ryerage priced home iFl Federal Way. Aeeerdiflg to the King
Cel:1fl.ty Offiee of Regional Policy and PIlH'lllillg, the average price for a Federal Way
Revised 2002 2005
V-11
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
home '.vas approximately $213,060 in the first three quarters of2001). D1:H"æg this same
fleried, the median smgle family heuse priee iR Federal Way was $188,000. In the mere
extreme eases, these iRdhiduals aad families may Reed same type of govemmeflt s1:1Ðsid)'
te aeeess eyeR reatal housing. If these employment trends eoRtitule, the City may be
under inereased press1:H"e to provide hotlsiRg assistaaee te these employed loeaUy iR Iew
wago jobs.
Table V 2
. - TT ç~ ~. . - -
19911leusiRI!; Prites in King Intome Requirements fef Typleal Oeeupations with Required EURiRg Powef
GttHttv
$171,000 MedillR PAeed C(mde UO,OQO lReeme R-el lIired I full time Eßglisll profeBsar ~§"$,39Q~ ar I filII time registered Rurse
($53,300) ar I full time USPS mail earrier ($37,goo) Imd 11161f time medieal
Attaehed Tawnhome after S% davJR
" --- .nm
,
SS6,OOO Ineeme ~l lIift!d I full time firefighter ($1],000) IIRd I half time iRsufllftae alaiHIII preeessar
$195,000 Heme U3,70oo) ar 1 full time maehinist ($10,300) IIRd I half time lillFtlfj, teehnieillR
after !% dev."H
,...~ Mm
$7!,!OO meeæe Requift!d I full time maÀlet reselll'eh analyst ($75,000) ar 8effl !uter seAv.'BfB engineer
$261,000 Median Prieed Heme ($71,000) ar I full time mÎerOOielegîst ($1&,QOO) Md I full time tFl\"Fel ageRt
after l()~{. deVl"H
;..,n Anm
,
$92,000 maeHlð ~qllired I full time hUff\llll resellreea æanager $69,300) and I full time retail S6l8S
$322,000 ":yt!fHge meed Heme ,,:,er1cer (g3~,300) e,r I full. time e~Ralfuetial1 manager ($61,00() andlful1
after I O~{. deWß
,
$839 kFeFllge reRt month average $33,600 ineeHlð required I (lill time ndmÎnistmtiveassistant ($33,800) ar earreetiÐfls emeer ($33,810)
r.ent fer a 2 lIedreamil bath Uflit ~.." __A ;AH .~', . .~ ' '---:A^':"
, ,
~ . .
The ÞJ8'{e1'ßl:ler2001 Annual Hawing .1ffi;fflasle BulJelin pliblished by the KiRg C¡¡lifl\)' Offiee af Regienal Peliey and PlanRiilg
Nøtet . .'
8alorieB life estimated based OR &\'eFIIges fer IIHtFy to mid eareer eamefS, unless otherwise speeiiied,
HousinQ Stoc"k and its Condition
According to the April 1. 2004. Washington State Office of Financial Management
(OFM) estimates there are 33.249 housing units in Federal Way. Of this total. 18.377 are
single family. 13.635 are multi-family. 1.219 are mobile homes or trailers. and 18 are
special housing. The majority of Federal Way's housing is fairly homogenous. The
housing primarily consists of single-family detached units. constructed in the sixties and
eil!hties. According to the 2000 Census. almost 11 percent of those sinl!le-family homes
are rentals. a lower percentage than the county's approximately 13 percent. There are
some mobile home Darks and a few duplexes located in the City. The rest of the housing
stock tends to be two and three stOry apartment buiIdinl!s. AIthoul!h. the number of
structures with 20 or more units has been increasing as a proportion of all housing in the
last several years. (The composition of this housinl! is illustrated in the figure below.)
Federal Wav'shousing provides only a narrow range of choices and does not fully reflect
the range of housing options that could be built.
Revised 2Q@ 2005
V~12
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
Figure V-4
Federal Way's Housing Stock
Mobile Homes
4%
Single Famll
55%
Source: Washineton State Office of Financial Manal!.ement. Ami] 2004
This lack of housing choice creates a situation where an increasing number of families
find it difficult to obtain suitable housing in the community. It affects empty nesters and
couples that have raised their families and who for life-stYle reasons. no longer need or
want a large single-familv house and the associated maintenance. Young adults. students.
young: married couples. and low-income workers would like to live in the communitY
where they grew up or currently work. but often cannot find a house that fits their
housing: needs or cannot afford the available housing. .
Subsidized Housinl!
Included in Federal Way's 33.249 housing units. is a limited amount of subsidized
housing. In 2004. there were 443 King: County Housing Authority (KCHA) Public
Housing units and approximately 800 subsidized units owned bv private non-profit
agencies and reserved mostlv for the elderly. physically disabled. or those with other
special housing needs. In addition. as of February 2004. 1.141 households were renting in
Federal Way using: KCHA Section 8 vouchers. A household with a Section 8 voucher can
live anywhere in the county. The tenant pays 30 to 40 percent of their income toward the
rent and HOD pays the remainder-up to a certain limit. Tenants are encouraged to pay
rio more than 30 percent of their income. but are permitted to pay up to 40 percent if
necessary to obtain suitable housing.
The demand for both subsidized housing and vouchers far out strips supply. For example.
in February 2003. 364 Federal Way residents were on the waiting list for public housing;
households are typically on the waiting list for I Y2 to 2 years. In addition. 420 Federal
Wav residents were on the waiting list for Section 8 vouchers: however. the Section 8
waiting list is closed to new households and it is not expected to open for the foreseeable
future.
Revised 2002 2005
V-13
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
Housin2 Inventery Condition
For the most part, the housing stock in Federal Way is in good condition. The City has
very little concentration of substandard housing, which is typically found in older urban
areas. However, houses in poor condition do exist in isolated cases around the City and in
small pockets.
.^..s depiøted iR FiguFC V 2 (page 2) preseRtly, 50 pereØfl-t 9fFederal Way's hol:lsmg stoek
is cOflstrueted as siRgle family homes. The remaining supply is composed of 15 pereeat
multiple family 1:Iflits and five pereefl.t mobile hames.
The 1999 City ofPcderal Way HNman Services Comprohcnsi,,'c Plan reperts that sevemI
programs ædst te assist iRdividl:1aIs with he\:1:siag eosts t9 help them \vith maifltØf1aRee of
existing hom¡iag. The most Ða'fflfFleR seÐsidies iFlehide redueeà east I:lflits for rØfl-t,
vol:lehers ør certifieEttes to assist with tenant located housing, grants to help with dO'Nfl
payments, redl:1eed interest rate loans, tlfld eash sl:lpplemeRts far utilities or home
Figure V 1
Federal Way's Heusing Steek
Multiple
Family
45%
Single-
Family
, 50%
maintenance. f.nøther r't1SOllroe is public hol:lsiag. The KiRg Col:lnty Housing A1:lthority
O'.VtlS 113 lIflits øfp\:1:bIie housing in Federal '\JJay.lR additioR, Section g certificates
provide subsidy øfthe rental cost of privately 0wfled hel:lsiRg. Within King County,
oütside of Seattle, g 1 percent of Seetion g certificates are wsed ia 8ol:1th Kæg COl:lflty,
where housffig is mere affordabIe.lR DeeeFBber 20(;)1,961 (16 percent of total
administered by the King County Housing Alitfl0rity) Seetiefl & eertifieates and/or
vouchers werebeiRg I:lseEl ia FeEleral Y'l9:Y.
There are presently seyen organizations that offer emergenoy shelter andlfllflsitiøaaI
housing to residents of Federal Way. The 1999 lOgO ðßsttf.c King CaNnl)' Nameless
Responsc RcpaFt states that there are apprØJ(imately 11& emergency shelter beds and 157
transitional housing units in South King County.
Revised 200:1 2005
V.14
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
None of these orgaRi:ætioas, by themselves, have the aapaaity to adefJ.Nately meet the
demand for serviee. Even with close aoopefation and coordination, they have had
difficulty meetiF1g the growing demand for services aFld providiag ease ffi&flagemeat for
cheats.
Another importaRt y¡a)' to pro'.'-ide affordable hoasiag is to preveffi the eJÜsting affordable
ho\:lsing steak from being redeveleped or deteriorating to the poiat that it is ao loogef
Nseable. l\1though the City eaR geaemte maps ofpreperty '.vith high rede'¡elopmeF1t
poteffiial, there is no data that speaifiaally describes how muoh f:'Iroperty is aetl:lally
redevelØJ3ed aad how many affordable heNsing units ar-e aemally lost. To address these
simations, the CWPPs promote deT,'elopmeat of stætegies 1e preserve existing low
iaaome Rousing. Toward that eaå, Federal Way 6l:1freatly allooates Cormnunity
Development Bleak Gt:aat (CDBG) fuRds to hol:lBing rehabilitation programs subjeot to
fwuls availability.
Future Housing Needs
The King County Assessor's Office provides infonnation related to housing construction
QuaIitv. which is agoo-d indicator of housing condition. The Assessor's data indicates an
overall housing stockof avera~e to better quality. There are a few areas. however. where
clusters ofbuildin~s have lower qualitY rankings. Two such areas of note are the
Westwav and Lake Grove neighborhoods. The City is aware ofthe housing condition in
these areas. In Westwav. the City and a grOUp of interested housing and social service
agencies are working with the community to identify approaches to improve the
neighborhood. The goal is to create a model for neighborhood involvement and planning
that could be replicated in other neighborhoods. Preventing existing affordable housing
stock from deteriorating is a key to retaining existing affordable housing.
Housina Cost and Affordabilitv
The tenn "affordable" is not dollar-specific: it is used in a relative sense. In the case of
housin~. "affordable" typically is defined as housing costs that total no more than 30
percent of a household's grOSS income. That affordable dollar amount. of course. chane:es
dependine: upon the income level of each household. The following table shows the
annual income. affordable monthly housin~ cost. and affordable home price. bv
household size. for each income grouP.
Revised ~ 2005
V-15
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
Table V-I
2004 Income Levels and Affordable Housinçw Costs by Household Size
Affordable Monthlv Housinf! Cost equals 30% of the household Os income. In the case of homeownershioo the
cost includes orincioal. interest. and orooertv taxes. The Affordable Home Price assumes a 5% down oavment
on a 30~ ear mort a e at a 6% interest rate.
Affordable Monthly
Housing Cost
Affordable Home Price $ 287.100
$ 328.300
$ 369.100
. $ 410.400
Unfortunately. housing costs often take a bigger bite out a household's income than the
recommended 30 percent. For higher income households. this still leaves enough money
to Dav for other necessities and perhaps some luxuries. It is lower income households that
are ne¡zatively impacted if they are unable to fmd affordable housine:. According to the
2000 Census. in Federal Way almost three-Quarters of households earning 50 percent or
less of median family income spend over 30 percent oftheir income on housing: almost
40 percent of those households spend over half of their income on housine:. Table V -4
provides more infonnation on residents overpavine: for their housing in Federal Way.
Ownership Housine
The cost of ownership housing in Federal Way. like other places in Kine: Collnw. has
been increasing. In Federal Way. the average price ofa sine:le-family home in 2003 was
$233.980. an increase of 24 percent since 1999. and the average price of a condominium
increased by 37 percent to $120.958.
Revised ~ 2005
V-16
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
Table V-2
2003 Housina Sales Prices in Federal Way
$286.247
$120.958
17%
37%
Source; Northwest Multiule Listinl!:
Affordabilitv of Ownership Housinl!
Compared to some other parts of the county. Federal Way's ownership housimr is ,
reIatiyeIy affordable. For instance. in 2003. the ayerae:e price of a home in Kin!! County
was $352.956. approximately $120.000 more than in Federal Way. As the table below
shows. in 2003. the ayerae:e priced single~family house was affordable to households oyer
80 percent of median income. while a three or four person household below SO percent of
median could afford an ayerae:e priced condominium in Federal Way.
.".,.". ",'"
..-,,-... ,
""',
Table V-3
Affordabilitv of Home Purchase in Federal Way. 2003
100% Median 120% Median Just Over 50%
Median
100% Median Over 100% Median Less Than 50%
Median
80% Median Over 800/0 Median Less Than 50%
Median
Less Than 80% Over 80% Median Less Than 50%
Median Median
Rental Housine
The Dupre + Scott Apartment Reports track rents by the size of the building: 1 to 19 unit
buildings and 20 or more unit buildimrs. The vast majority of rental buildine:s in Federal
Way are less than 20 units. Therefore. this section will examine rents for these smaller
rental buildings. It makes a difference since average rents vary based upon the size ofthe
buildine:. Rent in buildings with 1 to 19 units have less expensiye one~bedroom units (by
$87 a month) but more expensive larger units (from $87 to $387 more a month). This
could be because so many of Federal Way's single-family homes are rentals and sine:le-
Revised ~ 2005
V-17
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
family houses are the most expensive rental type. Rents in buildings with 1 to 19 units
average $586 for a one bedroom. $818 for a two bedroom. $1.207 for a three bedroom.
and $1.426 for a four bedroom.
Affordabilitv of Rental Housine
The following table. derived from the 2000 Census State of the Cities data tables. provides
some valuable infonnation. but can easily result in erroneous assumptions. For instance. it
makes it appear that there are not enough rentals for households over 80 percent of median
income. However. the 850 units cited as affordable are just those relatively few rentals that
are expensive enough to eQual 30 percent of these higher households' incomes. All the
rentals affordable to lower income households are. of course. affordable to these higher
income households as well. The Census further infonns us that onlv about 50 percent of
the housing affordable to each income group is actually occupied by that income group.
This demonstrates that other income grOUPS are renting units with rents that either equal
much less or much more than 30 percent of household income.
Table V-4
Quantity and Affordabilitv of Federal Way's Rental Housina for
Each Income Grou~
. I
79.5
17.4
3353 8450 L1
5085 850 N/A
80.1
23.9
2.
Source: 2000 Census
Note: The Dercent overDavinfl are the Dercent orhouseholds Davinfl more than 30% of household
income on housinfl.
Table V -4 also illustrates the need for housing for households earning 30 percent or less
of median income. For instance. by comparing the number of renter households earning
30 percent or less of median income with the number of rental units affordable to this
income grouP. we find that there is 1.803 fewer affordable housing units than needed for
this income grouP. This is further illustrated in the last colunm of the table. which shows
that almost 80 percent of these households pay more than 30 percent of their income for
rent. In addition. a significant portion of the few housing units that are affordable to these
very-low income households were built before 1970, implying that fewer are being built
more recently.
Revised ~ 2005
V-18
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
Federal Way's rental housinl!". as with the rental housing throughout the countY. is
I!enerally affordable to households in the 50 to 60 percent of median income range and
above. As Table V -5 shows. it is the households at 40 percent of median income and
below that have the most difficulty in findinl!" affordable rentals: aIthoul!"h. Iaflzer '
households at 50 percent of median income also lack for affordable rental housinl!. For
example. a three-person household eaminl!" 30 percent of median income pays $292 more
than they can afford for a two-bedroom apartment in Federal Way. The fil!UTe also
demonstrates why overcrowdinl!" may be so prevalent in Federal Way. Low-income
households can only afford rentals with three or more bedrooms by doublinl!" or triplinl!"
UP with other households.
Table V.;5
Affordabilitv of Federal Way's 2004 Averal!e Rents
.,." '.
,.. . ,..¡.'
$586 '!lliID $192 $349 $372
$818 IDW ílli§}' ~ illI $372
$818 !lli£l æm $58 $234 $418
$1.207 ($624) ($428) ($234) ~ $465
$1.207 !W.ID ~ !llim $55 $502
$1.426 !RQ1l ($460> (illill $23 $576
$1.426 ~ ($398) ílli.1} illQ $613
Source: Dunre + Scott 1-19 Anartment Renort. Betsv Clark & Associates
In conclusion. it appears that the rental market is providing affordable rentals to
households above 50 percent of median and ownership of simrle-family housinl!" for
households above 80 percent of median. and ownership condominium for those at
approximately 50 percent ofm'edian. Therefore. all the City's affordable housing
Revised 2002 2005
V-19
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
programs. current and proposed. (e.g.. density bonuses. inclusionarv zonimz. impact fee
waivers. federal Community Development Block Grant rCDBGl funding. etc.) should
target these income groUPS not otherwise being: provided with affordable housing bv the
private market.
Future HousinQ Growth
I,
The purpose of the GMA. is to 'assist every city in responsibly planning for growth.
Growth will occur. We can either scramble to accommodate this growth or'pIan for it.
Left alone. the housilllz market will build housing in the easiest and most profitable
manner to meet the housing demand. Unfortunately. unless guided bv good policy.
zoning. development rellulations. and incentives. this market-driven response usually
does not supply the diversity of housing choices and prices that result in a healthy and
attractive community.
Housine: Tare:ets
During their September 25, 2002 meeting, the GMPC adopted a motion to aàà targets for
new households andjoes fer the periad 2001 update thetanzets for new households and
iobs for the period. 2001 - 2022. These targets were based on a methodology developed
over a two-year period by the King County PIaIll1ing Directors. The adopted 2001 -=
2022 housing target for:Federal Way,if:l6;188new"tesidentiaI units. .
,: ' ,.;., .. ::~", ," ,i.",:
The ffi:llRber afhØl:lsing æits. alvlEl)'sêJu;ieedsthenutnòer ofão1:lseaolds, aRd is dependent
OR W6aRer r&tes. ,
.-'" "'.:'" ..
TRe C\VPPs sllg'gest tRatFeder:aI Wa:yþlali fer~' ad,di1ionall,238 ill'1itS, theeql:1ivalem
øf20 pereent øfprajeeterl net Re1:lseRold gra'.v-.h, thatilfe affordable to very Ie'll ifl6ome
families (less thaa 50 ]:I ere eat €if median) aad 1,052 housing units, the e~Hb:aleflt af 17
]:Iereent af]:lrejeeted Het ha\:1seheld g:ra\WR, that are affordable to la'.\' ineome fafFlilies
(between SO and 80 pereent afmedian) by the year lO22.
Housing is considered affordable when a family is speflding not more than 30 pereeRt of
their monthly income if renting, and 25 pereent if p1:lI'6hasing, or three times their tlflfI.1:Iai
ia6ame ifpoc6aasiflg a Rome. Far a three person very low in6ome family in Federal Way
(see Table V 1), it means that the mootRIy rem e1<61uding utilities f/.'}I;lst be less thaR $710,
or i[they are bl:l)~flg a heme; it ml:lst eest less than $95,200 at 2000 priees. The Seattle
Everett Real Estate Researeh Repact reparts that in the Fall af 2(;)0 1, the median rent for a
two beœ-aofÐIane bath apartæeflt '.vas $703 in Federal 'Nay, deffloflstfatiflg that Federal
Way Ras affardabIe reatal apfJormnities. However, to build Remes that are available for
$95,200 'No1:lId reEl1:lire signifieaRt p1:1blie subsidies.
Ta ensoce that ReV! ÀoNsiRg liftits are a positiYÐ addition ta the eommunity, the City
adopted residefltial design guidelines in 1998 in order to efl601:lI'age more variety in the
types of units available aarl mere iRflevative and aesthetically pleasing design.
ReElNests fur help by Federal Way residents for homeless shelters, transitional housing,
aad SfJeeial Reeds Ro1:lsiag æL6eed sl:tfJply.
Revised :!QQ;! 2005
V-20
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
#
lB 1999, the Crisis CliFiie Comm\:1flit)'lBformation line reoeiyed 195 ealls ITem
Federal Way residents seeking emergeaey shelter afld from 188 resideRts seekiRg
pell-1'lRflent housing.
#
The Oeteber 19, 1999, Uniled Way øf King County Health and Hl1llHaH Services
Community Asscssment reports that iR 1989, less dum 16 pereent of peep Ie
reqeeatiRg emergeaey or traIlsitiO1'1al shelter in South KiRg Cetmty were able to be
shelteriad due to lack of available spRee.
#
The doffiestie abwe shelter pro'lided 192 Rights ef shelter te domestie vieleRee
vietiffis, &f1d tt-Jrned aìvay ffl&f1)" mere women at'Id ebilElfeR ooe te laek ef space.
#
There is a Heed fer fflere sepperted liviRg units (QFJartJ.:.aeRtG Elfld shBf'ed single
family heffles) fer the ffleRtaUy ill.
#
ill the fall of 1999, there were approJt:ÎfflateIy 65 homeless ohildreR iR the Federal
Way School District.
#
There may presently be a Reed fer 96 liftits of housing fer perseas '.vith AIDS in
southwest King County.: :
, ,.',....
""
.... ..
. , '
Federal Way works with the KiagCelil'lty Cofisertium and R~ighèeriRg eities to
implemeat effeetive heHsiRg geaIsaRd pelieies to ffieetfuäe he1:lsing needs. /" .
comprehensive strategyensuresth&t safe Elfld sHitabIe housiag is available to residents of
all income levels aRd speeial Reeds, as required by GMA. '
Of that 6.188-unittarget. per the CWPPs. 20vetcent 0.238 units) should be affordable to
households at or below 50 percent of median. and 17 percent (1.052 units) should be
affordable to households between 50 and 80 vercent of median income.
Housing Capacity
As is described in the Land Use chapter, based ØfI. the mast reeent eapacity aFlalysis, there
is a reffifl:ining Federal Wav currentIv has a capacity for 5,538 new residential units, ,
including 3,265 detached single-family homes and up to 2,273 multiple-family æHts-.
units. The cavacity for 1.415 of those muItifamilv units is located in mixed-use
development zones. Given the 6.188 housing unit target above. Federal Way. at the time
of the target adjustment. had a capacity deficit of 650 housing units.
The City will increase its cavacity in order to eliminate this deficit in a number ofwavs.
For instance. in order to encourage more residential develovment. the City will consider a
number of changes. including a change to the definition of density for conventional
subdivisions. Currently. density is based on minimum lot sizes. The change would base
density on gross acreage. This should result in relativelv more lots than presently
allowed. In addition. the City is focusing its policy and development efforts on the City
Center and mixed-use zones to ensure that the projected multifamilv housin2: is built in
those areas. For instance. it has adovted a ten-vear exemvtion from VfOVertv taxes for
multi.family development within the City Center. The City is also vrevaring a Planned
Action SEP A for the City Center. which would allow environmental review to occur in
Revised ~ 2005
V-21
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
advance of development. This is an incentive for developers since it allows development
to Droceed more Quickly. As Dart of the Planned Action SEPA. the City is considering
allowing increased height for structures in the City Center. which would increase
potential capacity for new residential dwelling units.
Meetin~ the Need for Housina
In addition to ensuring the land caDacity to accommodate the exDected growth in
households. the City must do what it can to ensure diverse housing opportunities for all
income groups. Although no city can guarantee that the housing built will be affordable
to all income grOU?s. cities can encourage and facilitate housing that is more affordable
using factors it does control. such as land use regulations. For instance. the City can
ensure that it has an adequate amount of land zoned to facilitate the development of
affordable housing opportunities. such as smaller lot sizes. townhouses. cottage housing.
cluster housing. accessorv dwelling units. duplexes. triplexes. small-scale apartments.
senior apartments. and single-room-occupancy housing.
Zonine: and Development Ree:ulations
Jurisdictions ?lace the most sÏlmificantcontrols on housing development through land
use controls and zoning. By a carefuLevahiation and revision ofland use regulations.
Federal Way can sÏlmificantIv influence the amount. tvPe;desÏlm. and affordability of the
housing built in the community. Federal Wav. like mostù.tban and suburban jurisdictions.' ..
is already "built out": therefore., theigreatestoPDortunities for expanding the types of
housing available are ininfill and redevelopment. not new development.
In general terms, tHe primary Therefore. The first component of the City's Federal Way's I
housing strategy is to promote inMfill while protecting the character and quality of its
existing single-family residential neighborhoods. New detaeHed units will be constructed
OR ;,:aeaR! lots in existing neighborhoods but they 'lIiIl he eompatible witH tHe e1lÎsting
Homes. Planned Unit Developments and For instance. it's possible to increase the number
of units in existing single-family neighborhoods without changing the neighborhood
character bv allowing accessory other special doveleflæeat teelm.if lies dwelling units.
duplexes. cottage developments. or low-density multifamilv structures. The City already
allows cluster housing in single-family zones: however. other techniques such as lot
averaging may be added to the FWCC to encourage compatible development on difficult
sites and near environmentally sensitive areas. Ho'l:cver, ImDIementation of the City's
design guidelines will ensure that in-fill development will Rot be permitted at the eJlpenSe
of tHe C}1:lality of life iR be compatible with existing neighborhoods.
A aeeoadary The second component of the housing strategy is to encourage higher
density residential uses in the 1-5/Highway 99 corridor, including the City Center-Gere
and City Center Frame. Row houses, townhouses, condominiums, and mid-rise
residential buildimis are appropriate in tRia area sl.-lejeet to these areas given the
availability of utilities and other infTastructure, access to public transportation, jobs,
shopping, entertainment, and social and human services. This plan anticipates that during
the next 20 years, the City Center and the Highway 99 colTidor will redevelop and
accommodate the majority ofthe City's new housing units, particularly multiple family
Revised 2002 2005
V.22
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
'-,", "
, "":
.;"",
,',:::-':,c,,: ,'<-" ;";
housing 1:H'lits, added to the City's HweHtory. multifamily housinlZ units. The area will
gradually become a denser, mixed use, pedestrian friendly, high amenity, high quality,
vital part of Federal Way.
The third part of the strategy is to ensure that there is sufficient land available for other
housing needs such as government assisted housing, manufactured housing, housinlZ for
low-income families. and special needs housinlZ. includinlZ group homes-, and foster care
facilities. The Land Use chapter and FWCC provide support for this these type§ of
housing. In 2002, the City adapted a code ameHàmeat to eliminate tHe separatioH ~
reqæremeHts fer social servioestransitional ho~siRg withiH ml:lltipIe family residential
zones provided that f1a less thafl eRe 1:H'lit afld 1'10 mere than fi~ per-eeRt of the hol:lsiRg
'within the multiple'family eomplen: may Be social services transitioaal he\i.sing.
, Together, the Lafld Use afld Hal:lsiHgeh8f)ters and the associated deveIopmeat regl:lla-tiaHs
provide StlffieieHt eapaeity ta aeeømm.eåate prajeeted housing grovlth f{lf all eeeftomie
segments of the popula-tiafl. It is impertaflt that the City implemeat a hel:lsißg pregmm
that will assist private developers and private Han profit organiætiaas ifl møetiRg the
ideRtified housing needs. Such action is not oflIy reql:lired by GMf~, but it is also prudent
pub lie paliey efl.d v¡ilI efJ.Sl:lfe a safe afld sl:lpparti~ housing eB'liroameat for fu.t1:1re
geaeratio:as. A critical issue in providinlZ a sufficient amount of this housing is to remove
any relZUlatory barriers to locating such housiI~1Z throulZhout FederalWay. ' ' "
Affordable and Special Needs Housine Strateeies " :, '-
One way that Federal Way can encourage special needs and affordable ho~iIlg is bv
, removinl!; relZUlatory balTiers and ensUii~gaI1"ãdèqÙate amoÙÌ1t ofhmd zoned to facilitate
affordable housing. such as smaller lot sizes. townhouses. cottaee housing. cluster
housing. accessory dwelline units. duplexes. triplexes. small-scale apartments. senior
apartments. single~room-occupancy housing. and boarding homes.
A critical element that makes housing mO're affordable is cost-consciO'us deveIO'pment
regulations. Subdivision and development regulations should be modified to ensure that
land is used efficiently: that the regulations reflect CUlTent safety heeds. and that thev
pennit and encourage construction of a broad range of housing Mes. For instance.
structural setbacks and street widths could be modified to facilitate small lot
develO'pments. cottaee housine. cluster housing. and zero-lot line developments.
In additiO'n. since the private housing market mostlv targets those eaminlZ middle and
upper incomes. the City should consider providine extra incentives or requirements for
developers to build housing affordable to' those with less financial resources. The City
alreadv requires rental housing deveIO'Pments of25 units or more to provide affordable
housing units. and it also offers an affordable housing density bonus in the CitY 'Center.
Other programs it could offer include impact fee waivers. parking requirement
reductions. and affordable housing requirements in conjunction with transit-oriented
development. One incentive program alone is often not enough to encourage develO'pers
to participate. For example, a study by the Growth Management Planning Council
(OMPC). Affordable Housing Incentive Program for King County. suggests that.
dependine upon economic factors. a density bonus program needs to be combined with
other incentives in order to be fiscally feasible.
Revised ~ 2005
V-23
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
If the City provides incentives. cost-conscious development regulations. and allows
affordable housilllz types. the private market is more likely to provide housilll! affordable
to low- and moderate-income households. However. it is impossible for the private
housing market to meet the affordable housing needs of very low-income households.
which includes many with special needs. For example. a senior or disabled person on
Supplemental Security Income has an income of about $570 a month. which is about 13
percent of median income. After food and other essentials. this person does not have
much money left to pay for housing. Furthennore. rents that are affordable to this income
group cannot cover the basic operating and maintenance cost of the housim!. Substantial
capital development subsidies. as well as rent subsides. are needed to make new
construction affordable to very low-income households.
To help meet this need for subsidized housing. Federal Way uses the funds available.
such as its federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) dollars. to help fund
needed housing and sUPPort services. Federal Way also works with the King County
Consortium. neighboring cities. local. state. and federal funding sources. and service and
housing providers to coordinate funding and to develop and implement effective housing
policies and programs to meet future housing needs.
5.3
KEY HOUSING ISSUES
Preserving Neighborhood Charact~r
.^~fJ the population öfthe 8i'ea ifl Rfld 8i'Ðl:H'ld Federal Way dm:ibled during the 1980s,
residents feared that Preserving existing neighborhood charactenmd 'alHes were
threatened.
Approximately 7,000 fleV¡ FfH::lltifamily units v:ere èHilt ifl Federal W9:'j behveefl 1980 and
-t-990.MRflY oftliese 1:J11its ,-yere not well desigRed 9:fld were àa 3flaz8i'dly sited across the
entire City. This resulted in substantial changes to tho character offleighbørbøøds, ar
created new neighborhoeds aleflg malar arterial streets. Pr-eservation of existing
neighborhoods has beef! cited as ̧. an important community value in Federal Way. +his
valHe played a large røle in the community's deeisiøl1 113 iflcerpørate.
One ofthe reasons the community incorporated was to have more control over
maintaining the character of its existing single-family neighborhoods. The FWCP
recognizes that neighborhoods are special places and are valuable and important to the
quality of life for many citizens. New In particular. new development in established
neighborhoods must be sensitively designed and constructed. New development vlithin
existing single family neighborhoods should be limited tø small seale, v¡ell desigaed ifl
fill, 9:fld accessory hÐ1:1siflg. constructed. Likewise, new multiple-family or mixed use
development located along arterials running through or adjacent to existing residential
neighborhoods should be designed to minimize adverse impacts and with sufficient
buff<Jrs. to its suIToundings.
Revised 2OOé 2005
V-24
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
Development Review
There are several aetioas the City may take to make housing more affordable. Time is
money to a housing developer. Thus, whatever the City can do to reduce pennit-
processing time will make housing more affordable. f..eeordiagIy, as Asþart of the HB
1724 code revisions, which were enacted in 1995. the City revised the FWCC so that
more land use decisions are administrative decisions, thereby avoidingtime:consuming
public hearings.
Second, the City The CitY also has in place a preapplication process that allows the
developer to meet with City representatives at an early stage in the review process to
ensure that the applicant understands City development regulations. Such early meetings
allow the City and housing developer to agree on the best method to achieve a code
. compliant and mutually beneficial site plan prior to having spoot spending significant
sums on costly design and engineering w?rk.
A significant portion of the cost of building housing is the cost of providing the necessary
infrastructure. If the City is interested in providing housing that is affordable to very low
income citizens, it could, to the extent economically practicable, provide the necessary
infrastructure, or possibly subsidize the cost of providing public facilities such as streets,
parks, utilities, transit facilities, public amenities, and social services. Federal and state
grants. including CDBG fundsànd ether gnmts are available for this p1:H}3ose and should
be used where appropriate.
'!
Citizen Participation
Moderate seale ho1ising de':elopment that is cansistent with City polìey aad regulations
should be reviewed aad epJ3reved thro1igh a presøMeå, effieieat, aad eoasistent
administrative proeess, '-,mieh ffiÌaimizes re'/ie',v time and the sltbsef.i1iØflt iRereases in
prejeet costs. Larger scale developmoot plans, or these vmieh '.vill have sigAifieant
imf'aets on Housing volicies and development. which results from these volicies. impact
the environment of Federal Way residents. Therefore, it is essential that citizens are
involved both in deyeloving policies. such as those in the FWCP. and in reviewing
vrooosed housing developments. To accomvlish this the CitY has different sl:IITol:1flding
neighborhoods, should have full p1:1blie re'liew at> defined in the FWCc. The p1ièlie and
the developer should levels of citizen oarticioation orocesses. The orocess used deoends
upon the scale of the develooment and its ootentiaI to imoact Federal Wav citizens. Both
the public and develooers should have a clear understanding of the citizen review
process, including the types of issues that are open to discussion, and the time frame for
completion of the review process.
Housing Good Design and Inno'Jction Diversif in
The ehalleRge in this pIfifl aRd subsequent code nwisioFi work is to be flexible when
presented with creatiye and high quality design proposals. Of course, this fleJÜbility must
Revised 2002 2005
V-25
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
be bahmeed with the Reed te provide a degree of certainty to the developer and to give
elear guidanee te policy makers, staff, ead public. The follo'.viRg paragraphs deseribe
several regt:lIatory meehanisms v:hioh the Cityooulè iHeIHde iR its zoRiRg eode that
would eaeeurage sHperier design, a greater variety efhm:lsing types, &fId reEhIee eosts.
!neenti';øs For Geed Practice C Many jl:1risdiotions include incentives in their zoning code
that ooeolffiige develapers t8 bl:1ilè projects in a WB:Y that pradtiees some ideRtified ptiblie
benefits. The p$lic benefits might include creative designs that are sensiti'..e ta
eeffifl'}\:ltlity aad Reighbørltøød valHes, dedieatiaFl af land ar right af way for publia \:1se,
II:fId eøastruetioR afHrban amenities, eeR1ffH:lfiity faeilities, &fId ether p$lia Sflaaes. The
City ofPederaI Wrty has aàepted a density beH1:lS provision in the City Center, whereby
buildiRg height OaR he iflereased from 35 feet to a mB:JlÎm1:lffi ef 85 feet, and Ham 4& ta gg
dwelling ooits per aare for multiple family &Rd seRier heNsing, in E:m:ehaFlge fer providing
pub lie opeR space or prtyiHg a fee iR lie\:l €If. In addition, new multiple family or mixed use
projects iH &fly zaBe inyol..r.ng 25 dwelliFlg ooits ar mare are reE{\:lired ta provide affardable
dwelliag 1:lI1its. PrÐjeats previdiag afferdahle dwelliFlg ooits ffiRY eJceeed the maJlÎffR-lm
number of alIo'ned l¥:¡el1iflg units up to teFl pereent B:èave the ffiRJLÎml:1m. In siFlgle fuæ.ily
subdi'lisieRs, tflose lots that are prepøsed te eoRtaiFl afferd&èle à-"velliRg 1::I11its ell:fl be
reduced in area by 1:IfI te 20 percent øfthe miRim1:lffi let si25e aftRe ooderlyiRg zaRiHg
distriet; fIrovidod that the everall à-welliFlg 1::I11its iR the s$divisieH mB:Y nat e},eeed teH
percent ofilia maximum number of units alla'Ned ia the I:1Hderlyiag zÐfliRg d-istriet.
!nchtsientlry Zoning C In eertain Zeøes, de'lelopmeat might be required to meet certain City
goals, suehas pre'Ading affordable housing, as set out iR the PWcc. It is beeamiag more
eoffifHoHplaee for jurisdietiaas te req,l:1Îre maj er develoflers te provide a portioa ef1ew
income hol:lsiag iFi deyelepments over a eertain scale. The City amended the FWCC in
1997 to require multiple family develapmeat, ar mixed I:1se fIrejeets iH'løh<iag 25
d\'+,ellÍFlg \:Illits or more, to previde at least t\'/e 1:lßits, ar 25 pereoot, wkieÀever is greater,
as affurdable hel:l:sing to those at gO pereoot ar belew mediaR eounty iaeome. .
Planned Unit De",'clopmcnt C A PIll:flaed Uait DeveleflmeHt (PUD) ordiaaFlee allo""'3
developers fleJdbility to aaftie're design, layout, or density that is suited te a speaifie site.
/'.6 aFl example, a PUD allows elooteriFlg efhel:16iFlg deRaity iR mere de'¡eloflable pertiÐRs
ef a site while protecting impertllHt epoo spaee II:fId oo.l'ÌreRmeHtally sensitive areas. A
PUD ordinance gi.¡es the City aDd the deveIapmeat aoffiffiW1ity fleJÜbility to provide a
variety efhousing types and eosts iH Hew residemiaI areas or smaller, older, mixed use
neighborhoods. lFlI99&, the City revised its Cluster PravisieHs ia the 8HbdivisioR Cede
to allow reduetieH iH miaifl'R-lm lat sizes and to aI1O'.... zere lot liae develoflffieat fer no
more than 1\\'0 1:lHits. .
T1'tll'lsfcr of Development Rights C This teelmiq,l:le alle.vB a developer to treHsfer pefffiitted
density fram ORe fIart af a site te another, or from one site te aHetfler. It is a I:1seM
technique for preteetiag parts of sites thrtt are ea.1iroHfFleHtally seasiti...e withem loss of
land value. It also allows fer mere doose furms efhal:lsiRg developmeRt, tRereby redl:1eiag
hø1:lsiHg eeata.
Revised 2002 2005
V-26
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housíng
Diversifying Housing Choice
The majority of the housing awilable in Federal Way ted6-Y is f1iirly homogeßØus.
Housing primarily øonsists of single fa.miIy detaehed 1:Ißits, eenstrueteå. in the sixties and
eighties, laid e1:1t in isolated s1:1bdiyisions diseoFlßeeted Kem the \::1fban fabrie. There are
some mobile home p6-rks and a €e'N dl:1pleJœs Ioaated ÎR the City. Howe'o'er, in the last six
years, 792 senier Ðf assisted heN sing units, and 240 convaleseent units (skilled care beds)
have beeI'l.1:n.lÎIt. The rest of the hØl:lsiI'l.g stoak tends te be two and three story apartment
b1:1ildiI'l.gs. This provides OfHY a I'I.aITew range ef ahoiees and àees Rot f1:1l1y refleat the
range of fl<msing eptieas that could be built.
It ereates a situation ",there an inereasiI'lg I'l1:lmber of families Had it diffie1:1It to ebtain
s1:1itable hØ1:lsing in the o011lfßl:lßity. It affuets empty nesters and eel:1ples '",lie haOle raised
their families who, f.ar life style TeaseRS, no 10Hger Heed eT want a large single family
RoNse and the associated fRftintenaflee. Y 01:1flg ad1:11ts, sædents, Y°lclFlg manied ee1:1ples,
and low meeme werkers we1:1là like to live iR the ae1'Hfl.'1l:1Rity where they grew,',' I:1p or
ol:HTently werle, but cannot find a house that fits their housing needs or cannot afford the
availabIehe1:1sing.
The City's design guidelines will ensure that Federal Way is able to maintainand
improve the character and quality of its. existing residential areas. while at the same time
providing more diverse housing choices for its residents. New housing should be more
diyerse;eontributing diverse arid designed in å 'way that contributes to commwÜty.
character and relatiI'l.g better to'the relates well to the existing neighborhood environment.
It should reassure residents that they will be able to afford to live close to their jobs,
friends, and families. It The proposed housing diversity will also help preserve and
maintain neighborhoods that. irioIudeby ensuring that there are housinlZ opportunities for
a healthy mix of ages and incomes.
Housing Affordability Affordable and Special Needs Housing
On a oounty-Nide basis, Federal W6-Y is a very affordable øommunity. The pe¡:IIJlatien of
Federal \N6-Y teflds to be ye1:lRger th9:R other eofßfß1:1Rities, ereatiflg a strong demand for
moderately priced fl01:lsiHg. There were approximately 9,500 low income households in
1996 iH Federal W6-Y if1 need of koNsiRg assisffiflee. The increasing number of low
il'leome he\iseheIå.s elan be attributed in part to a gI"ewÏflg Hamber ef senior citizens who
are likely to need both housing assistance and related serv'Îees. P8RC also prejeeteà a
strong demand for affordable multiple family units thre1:1gR the year 2000 to serve low
and very low income families who work in Federal \Va-y.
. The GMA and CV.'PPs require that mooieipal j\::1fisdietiofls aàopt strategies for providing
a "fair share" ef ideRtified regieaaI housiRg Reeds. The C1NPPs set a target of 2,290 new
affordable housing units in the City by the year 2022. Oftàat n1:1æåer, 1,238 Ff11:1st be
affordable to "el}' lo",{ iHeome citizens.
Revised 2002 2005
V-27
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
The need for homeless shelters, transitional Þousing, and speeiall'l.eeds hol:1siflg eJl6eeds
the available fmpply. The City has ftæded several speeial Fleeds projeets ifl the past fe-,y
years to help address this l'I.eeEl. The CWPPs as well as GMA require provisions for
speeial needs llOl:1siFlg. Special needs hol:1siflg, also flaIled "SI:1Pfl°rti-/e hol:1siFlg," briFlgS
tegether housiNg tmd S1:lpport services for eoIllillUBity resid6f.lts \'fflO l'I.eed speeial s6íViees
ifl order to live ifld6f.J6ftclefltly or with minimum assisÌ:ttftee. This il'l.eIl:1des serviees ifl
ho\:lsiFlg operated by pwlie and private agencies. Aeeeræag to the 2000 2003 King
C8Imty Cønso/idstcd Homing &: Commlmityßc>¡;e[opmcl'lt Plan, there is a l'I.eed fer flfl
additional 500 beds eol:lßtywide.
Aooordiag to the 2000 census,Jhe prÐflertiel'l. of elderly at 7.7 pereeFlt is smaller in
Federal Way tflafJ. iFll'l.eighboring South COWlty cities, exeept fur KeRt. Average life
eRpeetaaoy oontÎfll:1es to elima, aad we should expect an increasing pereentage of Federal
Way's papulation will be 65 flfld ever il'l. the ReJ"t 1 0 te 20 years. As dise\:lssed earlier in
. tills eHapter I:lflclcr PøpulaU81'l, there ai'e three reaseHS the a1:l:mber et elderly eeFl be
e-xpeeted to iFlerease: 1) natural agiHg of the pep1:ilatieR; 2)they are releeatiFlg to f1fld
afferdahle ho1:!sing; and 3) a large H\:lmher ef aeRier hol:1siag 1::1flits ha'/e beeFl reeemIy
eoflstrueted. Because wem6fl tead telive leager,than meR, this pop\:lIatioFl will be
predemil'l.aatIy female.
Elderly peepIe are aften reluetant to give1:lp theeeH1Íert flfld see1:H'Îty pre'¡jded by their
O'Nfl homes. With this ia minâ~ feder:al aad state poIiey has sHifted from one of providing
institl-ltionalized eare fer sl'JFiiefs to a more home based or "aging in plaee"policy. Many
seaiers, al'l.d most of those over 75, need somelevel etia home serviees. f~selderly
peeple Bee0me morc frail, their supportive service needs increase. They ma)' be better
served inoaagregate eare faGilities, or eventually, long tann care faoilities. Federal W-a'j
should begil'l. plaf1HiFlg for a continuum of care that minimizes family stress and public
costs. In. heme sernees sho\:lld be available Cit)'\\'ide, while GORgregate oare faoiIities and
leag teffi1 eare faeilities should be located near to community services and shopping
areas, flflEl away from busy traffic corridors.
Aeeordifig to the 2000 2003 King County Consolidated Housing & Cemmunity
Dcy'C/opmcl'lt PkLI'l, ia 1997, flfl ayerage of 9,121 adl:11ts with e8raHie ar severe m6f.ltaI
ilh'less were served by the King COWlty Regional Support Network. Safe and affordable
Ho1:l.siflg, a key eIemeat in a long term therapy pregmm f{lf these people, is not available
for a maj0rity efthe 10'N ineome meatally ill in Kiag COtiflty or FeEleral Wa-y.
There are no demestie sHelters 10eated ia Federal 'Va-yo H0wever, Federal Way is
e1:HTeatly served BY several pfogflms for VÌetims of dom8stie Y'Îol6flee. The Domestie
,,^.:l;mse "'0ffi6f.l'S Netw0rk CDA WN) provides 21 shelter beds, as '¡¡ell as erisis
interventioa aBd s1:lppert serviees. The 80m£. Kiag C01:l.flty Bfflfleh oftàe Y'NCA also
serves Federal Way area residents. There is dearly a large uninet need for emergency
R01:l:siag ia 80mh Kiag Col:lßty for vietims ef àomestie aÐ\:lse.
King COWlt)' jurisdietions reeei'¡e Ho\:lsil'l.g Oppertl:lRities fer Persons with AID8 reatal
assistflflee fUßdiFlg from HUD. Federal "'ay partieipates iFl the oversight of this program
"'lith Sea-ttle aeting as the lead authority. Aeoording to the 2000 2003 King County
Revised ~ 2005
V-28
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
C81'1S8lidated Holé3i1'lg &: Cammu1'lity Development Pie."" in mid 199& in King County,
there ""ere aa estimated 2,H,1 pefsoas ¡i','iag ';¡ith .^~IDS, while betweea G,OOO a.ad 9,000
pemÐfl.s 'Nere iafected ',vitl=1 HI". :\t the time af diagaosis, 19 percent, or 112 people,
diagaosed with AIDS lived outside the City of Seattle. Historioally, housing services
have beeR requested by 50 pereeRt ofthe total AIDS pofH:tlatioa afld aetHal hoooiag 1:IßÎts
are required by 33 percent of people liviRg v.4th AIDS. If these treads eofltial:1e, IG3
housmg l::J:flits \\'ould be reEJ.uired to serve this populatioR.
Sevel'al orgaaiætioas ia SÐuth King COURt)' offer emergency shelter a.ad transitioaal
housing to resideftts of the City of Federal Way. Existing data concludes that ourrent
faeilities are iftadeEJ.l:16te when compared to reEJ.1:1ests for help. The Soath Kiag CÐ\:Htty
Multi Serviee Center staff estimates that for every famil)' scrved in their emergeftey
shelter program, nine families are mœed 1l'.:'¡ay.l8 additioR, the Detaher 1999 United Way
RCp8F1. states thal.'l ia 1998, due to lack of spaoe in South King Cm.m.ty, less than 16
pereem: of people seekiag shelter reeeiyed it.
There are many reaSORB that people tæd families eHd up homeless. l8 1997, data ÍFem
shelters eR the Hal:1siFi.g Consortium (outside the City of Seattle) revealed that the mast
common reaSOR far homelessness was domestie vieleaee, rolla'lled by e'¡;¡etÎ.ÐR afld
filmily crisis. AeeerdiRg tÐ established servi.ee providers, s1:1èæ;ellfl hoæelesSfless iB alae
inereasing. Data from. the S01::lth Kiag COlmly M1::Ilti Serviee CeRter iRdieateB that the
proportioR ef ';vømef!., ehildren, and two paref!.t 'NorkiRg fam.iIies seekif!.g shelter is
growing rapidly if!. this eofRffi1:lßity..
I-t is difficult to estimate the. number of homeless children there aetuRll)' are ia Federal
Way, em the Fedeml '.\'ery Sehool Distriet repørts that if!. theirDistriet aIoae, if!. the fall of
1999,there ',vefe 65 homeless children. Federal Way Yo\ith aI.'ld Family Serviees ~orts
that many homeless ohildrea com.e fròm abusive homes or suffer from emotioHaI aegleet.
Homelessaess afld domestie instability may e&\-J.se deep emotioaal sears that im.paet a
child's ability to faeHs his er her full attem:ieR 6ft education.
There is also a Beed for transitional housing fer homeless if!.di'."Ìduals lIflà families. State
IIfld føderiilrules restrict the length of stay in emergeftey shelters tø GO da-ys. So, after
many families ha-ve eJlhausteà their time iR an emergency sheIt.er, they need aeeess to
longer term trt1fisitional hausif!.g, \vhere they ean live for one or two years, obtaiR
necessary suppart serv4.ees, aftd staeilize their lives.
Data is searoe so it is very diffieult to estimate the R1:Iß.'lber of beds that are Reeded to
hOl:lse the speeial Reeds pøpulatioa. However, there is æffiet Heed ia this seráee area.
The City is eommitted to festeriftg programs aRd supporting service proyiders to assist iR
meetiftg this Reed subjeet to eoonomio limitations, City revef!.1:I:es, aRd the Heed to ealaflee
housing agaiRBt all other public needs.
To be prosperous in the 10nJ:!:run. Federal Way must have sufficient housing affordable to
its bank tellers. firefighters. teachers. government employees. restaurant workers. sales.
clerks. and seniors on fixed incomes. Federal Way's goal is both to preserve existing
affordable housin~ and to ensure that there is an adequate amount of special needs
housing and housing affordable to its low and moderate-income residents. To this end.
Revised 2002 2005
V-29
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
the City will eliminate regulatory balTiers to special needs and expand opportunities to
develop affordable housing. The City will also facilitate a range of affordable housing
types throughout the City bv revising its zoning and development codes as necessary. The
CitY will also continue to offer densitY bonuses and other affordable housing programs to
encourage private developers to provide affordable housing. In addition. the City will use
its federal CDBO dollars and other resources to help fund the development and operation
of special needs and affordable housing. ..
Policy Coordination and Regional Participation
The GMA and good planning practice require that each chapter of the FWCP be
coordinated and consistent with goals and policies set forth in the other chapters. This is
. especially true of the Housing chapter, particularly as it relates to the Land Use and
. Transportation chapters.
The OM;\. alae re~res that City 1"elieies fer affordable he1:lsiag be eeasistæt with.
CWPPs. PSRC, Kiag Ce1:laty, and Federal Way ha'le jointly adopted regional planning
goals that estimate fair share he1:lsiag targets, iael1:ldiRg Ie'.\' aad '¡err law iaeeme heusing
targets that 1"romote an eq1:litaèle distribHtiea ef affordable housiag. This tyj3e efho\:1:siag
is most Bf'1"re1"riate in urban eemel'S that 6efltaifljebs tæd geed 1"1:lblie teRasit aeeess.
Coflsisteflt with taese H:1fttlirements, the City' s Land Use chapter proposes multiple
f8:ffl.ily ho1:lsiag and mixed 1:1se de'¡elo1"meRt ia the City Ceater, (eeffl1"rised efthe City
Ceflter Care &Rd City Center Frame), the Ceffiff}1:)flityB1:lsiaesszeae aleag the SR.99 &Rd
IS corridor, æd te a limited extenfitÙhe neighborhood retail centers. In addition, senior
he1:lsiRg is aUowed in the B1:1siaéssParli:tæd Offiee Park zoaes.All efthese leeatieas are
or will be well served by publie trahsit The City has also determined that housing, and in
1"artiealar ffi\::1Itiple family he1:1siag, '.viII be designed so that it 1"rovides a qHality 1"la6e te
live aad is eft asset to the community. In addition, the City is committed to fair housing
access to all 1"erseRS without discrimination.
This He1:1sing chapter must also be coordinated and Ðonsistent vlith the CelIDty's aRd the
City's fuA.diFlg programs for housing. This is particularly true for programs sueR as the
CDBG, Home, and other Countywide flIDding initiatives as recommended by the OMPC's
HÐ1:lsiflg Fifl&Ree Task Force.
The City also recognizes that most of the housing issues found in Federal Way are
common to the County, Seattle, and the other suburban jurisdictions. In order to ffisti:fe
quality in the City's previsiefl afhe1:1siag sernees, ensure that it addresses this regional
housing need effectivelv. and to help eliminate duplications of effort, the City should
continue to coordinate with the King County Consortium. other relevant Consortium
rel!ional entities. and other South King County cities when designiag eftà impIemeatiag
housing and RÐ1:1siag related developing policies and funding housing and housing~related
serVIces.
Revised ~ 2005
V.30
FWCC - Chapter Five. Housing
5.4
HOUSING CHAPTER GOALS AND POLICIES
The following section provides establishes goals and policies for providing, preserving,
and improving housing conditiøfls in Federal Way. These goals and policies provide a
framework from which to develop implemeatiag implementation strategies and work
programs for the community. The purpose of these goals and policies is to provide
housing opportunities to all segments of the population. Consistent with GMA, these
goals and policies should promote a variety of densities~ ami housing types, and
encourage preservation of the City's existing housing stock.
Overall Goal
Preserve and protect Federal Way's existing high quality residential neighborhoods
and promote a variety of opportunities to meet the housing needs of all residents of the
community and region.
Preserving Neighborhood Character
Goal
HGl
Policies
HPl
HP2
IIPð HP 2
Iß!4 HP 3
Preserve and protect the quality O/exist;flg residential neighborhoods and
require new development to be ofa scale and design that is compatible with
existing neighborhood character. ..
High-density housing projects, with the exception of senior housing, will
not be permitted in existing single-family residential neighborhoods. More
moderate densities such as cottage housinlZ will be considered.
Design gaidelines sflo\:lld 13e adopted potentially iFl SHeerea plans that will
spe6ify iR detail aeighbørheød eharaeter and require that new hø\:lsiag be
consistent with these design g\:lideliRes.
Amend development regulations to accommodate a diverse range of
housing forms that are compatible with neighborhood character and create
an effective transition between the City Center, business areas, and
residential neighborhoods.
Continue to allow accessory housing units within single-family
neighborhoods that p[01e6t in a way that protects residential character,
ensure proper access, maintain maintains specific design standards, and
6ømply complies with all applicable laws. Review accessorv housing
relZUlations and. if necessary. revise any regulation thatinappropriately
limits their development.
Revised ~ 2005
V-31
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
~HP4
IIPÐHP5
III!1HP6
Maintain a strong code enforcement program to protect residential areas
trom illegal land use activities.
Cend\:lct Subject to fundin!! availability. conduct periodic surveys of housing
conditions and efeate fund programs, including housing rehabilitation, to
ensure that older neighborhoods are not allowed to deterierate, s\:Iejeet te
av-ailability ef f1:1ftdiag for such surveys and programs. deteriorate.
If allowed by applicable law, development inside and outside the City
should be required to provide their fair share of onsite and offsite
improvements.
Community Involvement Aand Development Review
Goal
HG2
Policies
IIP8HP7
HP9HP8
Involve the community in the development of new housing to a degree that is
consistent with the scale of impact on the, surrounding neighborhoods.
Continue to ~ncourage public input into development of planning and
regulatory documents thtóughàformalpublic process characterized by
broad, thorough, and timely public notice of pending action.
Consider the economic impact of all development regulations on the cost of I
housing.
IIJ.!.1.C)HP9 Maximize efficiency in the City's development review process and ensure
that unnecessary time delays and expenses are eliminated. Continue to
P12rovide streamlined permitting processes for development that is
consistent with the FWCP and FWCC, and that has no adverse impacts.
DJ!.t..lHPIO Encourage community input, where appropriate, into the development
permit process by providing thorough and timely information to the public.
IJP.:H.HPll f~GGiGt Continue to assist developers with housing proposals at the earliest
possible opportunity, including preapplication meetings to produce projects
that can be reviewed quickly and maximize their ability to receive permits.
Revised ~ 2005
V-32
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
Good Desian and Diversifying Housing Choice And Design
Goal
HG3
Policies
IIP-H HP 12
HP13
HPl1
HP14
HP15
HP15
HP16
HP17
Develop a Comprehensive Plan and zoning code that provide flexibility to
produce innovative housing solutions, do not burden the cost ofhousing
development and maintenance, and diversify the range of housing types
available in the City.
The FWCC and Land Use chapter of the FWCP will be coordinated to
allew facilitate locating housing affordable to the lev; iaeome Iow.income,
anà-very Iow.income and special needs housing households throulZhout the
City. especially around the City Center and other areas providing that
provide proximity to low wage employment, safe and convenient access to
transportation and human services, and adequate infrastructure to support
housing development. .
Continue to use design £uidelines to ensure that new and inftll developments I
have aesthetic appeal and blend into surrounding development.
Amend develepmeflt regulatioÐs to eaeourage superior design afld greater
diversity of housing t)13es afld costs thraHgh such teelm.iqües as ineeatives,
inolusionary zoning, pIai1fI.ed ùnit developments, deasity boflHses, afld
transfer ofdeveIepmeflt rights. .
Establish appropriate minimum densities for each zone and encoura£e new
residential development to achieve maximum allowable density based on
gross area to ensure that the City can house the anticipated population
growth.
Caasiàer zero lot line staaàards withia planned l:1Ðit developmcats te ereate
higher deHsity siHgle family neighborhoods w4th large epeR space areas.
Review zoning. subdivision and development regulations to ensure that
they further housin~ policies and don't create unintended barriers. This is
of particular importance for small lot and cottal!e housing developments. In
order to facilitate small lot and cottage housing developments. it is
particularly important to revise. as necessary. the subdivision and
development regulations that govern their development.
As appropriate. Consider redloleiRg reduce minimum lot sizes to allow
construction of smaller, detached single.family houses on smaller lots.
Increase capacity and encourage I!featerdiversitv of housing types and
costs for both infill and new development through various methods. such as
inc1usionarv zoning. density bonuses. transfer of development rights.
Revised 2002 2005
V-33
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
cluster housing, cottage housilll!, IZard en housing, duplexes, and low to
moderate density housinlZ types.
III!¥f HP18 Continue to pennit mixed-use residential/commercial development in
, designated commercial areas throughout the City. Iaehule developer
ia6eHti'¡es IH'I.d desiga sttmdttrds. Develop incentive prolZI"ams to ensure an
adequate amount of housing is developed in these areas.
HP19
Increase the amount of undeveloped open spaces in both infill and new
development parcels, by expanding the use of cluster development and
allowing housinlZ techniques such as lot averaginlZ, and zero lot line
standards.
BP!8 HP20 Establish administrative procedures to pennit innovative housing designs
and techniques, provided they are of high standard and consistent with the
FWCP.
BP!9
Continue to provide ifl6ef1.tives, sHah as' deasity èoffilses, for previdiag a
portion of affordable housing ia ae'.... de'¡elopmoots.
HP21
Continue to provide incentives such as density bonuses for muIti-famiIv
housinlZ, and expand the types of incentives offered to encouralZe new
developments to include affordable housinlZ.
BP2D HP22Periodically review and update deveIopmenf regulations 'to inéorporate
opportunities for new housing types. .
Housing Affordability
Goal
HG4
Develop a range of affordable housing opportunities for low-income gF6ttpS
households consistent with the CWPPs and the needs of the community.
Policies
Jll!UHP23 Promote fair housing access to all persons without discrimination.
IIPU HP24
As estimated by CWPPs, maintain sufficient land supply and adequate
zoninlZ within the City to accommodate 17 percent of the City's projected
net household growth for those making 50 to 80 percent of King County's
median income and 20 percent making less than 50 percent of median
mcome.
~ HP25
Require a portion of new housing on sites of significant size to be
affordable to low-income hoHseholds. Easure that affordable hoHsiag is not
concentrated in parti6HIar aeighborhoods by settiag a perceatage limit to
the number of affordable housing Haits that can be inelHded ia Re'.'.' housing
Revised ~ ~
V.34
FWCC - Chapter Five. Housing
HP26
Iß!24 HP27
HP28
deyelopments. households at a level not provided otherwise by the private
market. Developers should be compensated for providinl! this affordable
housinl! bv increased density or other benefits.
Revise the City's affordable housinl! density bonus prol!fam to provide
housing at affordabiIitv levels not provided otherwise bv the private .
market. At a minimum. any affordable rental unitS should be affordable and
rented to households below 50 percent of county median income. and
ownership units should be affordable and sold to households at or below 80
percent of county median income.
Ensure that any new affordable housing remains affordable. reQuired bv the
City remains affordable throul!h some tool approved bv the City. such as
recordinl! a lien on the property. In the case of homeowners hip projects. the
lien can be structured as a deferred second mortgage to the homebuver. due
. upon sale if the subsequent buyer does not meet the income elil!ibility
standards. .
Coordinate all City affordable housinl! prolZrams so that a developer can
use multiple incentives or programs for a single project. ReQuired
affordability levels and duration of affordabiIitYshouId be the same for all
prOQI"ams.
~ HP29 Allow and encourage use of manufactured housing in residential zones,
provided it confonns to all applicabkfederaI, state, and Iocalrequirements
and is compatible with the character of the sUITounding neighborhood.
IIPU HP30 In order to maintain existing affordable housing, the City should continue
to allow manufactured home parks in existing locations. However, new
manufactured home parks will not be pennitted, nor will expansion of
existing parks be allowed.
~ HP31 Encourage new residential development to achieve maximum allowable
density based on gross area.
~ HP32
~ HP33
Explore federal, state, and local resources to assist in financing affordable
rental and ownershiv housing. Encourage expansion of home ownership
options through such means as first time home buyer programs, housing
cooperatives, lease-purchase ownership, and other housing models.
Consider delaying, deferring, or exempting affordable housing from
devel°Pll1ent fees, concurrency requirements, payment of impact fees,
offsite mitigation, and other development expenses that do not compromise
environmental protection or public health, safety, and welfare concerns, or
constitute a nuisance.
-IIPðO HP34 Support tax law amendments that provide relief to owners of affordable and I
special needs housing.
Revised ;¡goo 2005
V-35
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
HPðl ~
Identify low-income and very low-income housing resources that may be
lost due to redevelopment or deteriorating housing conditions. Develop
strategies that seek to preserve this existing housing, and that seek to
provide relocation assistance to households that are displaced as a result of
sHell. aetivities. an v redevelopment.
lIP» HP36
I
Annually monitor residential development to detennine the total number of I
new and redeveloped units receiving pennits and units constructed, housing
types, developed densities, and remaining capacity for residential growth
for all income levels and needs.
~ HP37 Integrate and coordinate construction of public inftastructure with private
development to minimize housing costs wherever possible or practicable.
Special Needs Housing
Goal
HGS
Develop a range of housing opportunities that meet the requirements of people
with special housing needs, including the elderly, mentally ill, victims of
domestic abuse, and persons with debilitative conditions or injuries. ..:
Policies
HPM HP38
Remove e1[istiRg Periodically review the FWCC and remove any regulatory
baniers to 5itiftg locating special needs housing to a','oid oonoentratioR and
emergency and transitional housinl! throul!hout the City as required bv the
federal Fair Housin~ Act. to avoid over-concentration. and to ensure
unifonn distribution throughout all residential and mixed-use zones, subjeÐt
to perfonnance standards that pro teet resideRtial amenity, ensure proper
access, and maintain design standards. zones.
HP39
Modify the FWCC's definition offamilv in order to simplify and clarify
the definition and remove anv potential baniers to sitinl! housinl! for
Drotected classes as defined in the federal Fair Housinl! Act
IIJ!.-ðS HP40 Review pennit applications for special needs housing in close coordination
with service providers and the City's Human Services program.
~ HP41-Assist special needs housinl! developers. local service organizations and
self-help groups to obtain funding and support.
IIPð+ HP42 Ensure that access to special needs housing is provided without
discrimination.
Revised ~ 2005
V.36
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
Goal
HG6
Develop emergency shelter and transitional housing facilities for the homeless.
Policies
HP38
Foster and SHpport serviGes that are not coneefltrated iH particular
fleighbørhoeds by settiflg a perGootage limit to the fl1:HRber of aff.ordable
housing units that can be included ifl fie';.. høHsiflg developmeflts.
IIPð9 HP43 Coordinate City actions related to homeIessness with the City's Human
Services Program and ether sHelter non-profit housinl! and human services
providers.
HP40
Continue to permit emergeney am:! trRflsitioftal homeless faeilities ',vithiR
the City.
HP44
Clarify the City's Social Services Transitional Housing (S8TH) definition
and rel!Ulations and make necessary changes to result in adequate
opportunities to develop transitional housinl! in Federal Way.
IIP4l HP45 .
. Emergency shelters and transitional housing should be regHlatl¡Jd te avoid
eeHeemratiofl of ¡aGilities, mitigate impaet OR sl:l1Tounding uses, permitted
and regulated to ensure there are adequate ovportunities to locate them
throughout the City. to avoid over-concentration of facilities. to ensure that
such housing is properly managed, and to avoid or mitigate significant
impacts on existing residential neighborhoods or other surrounding uses.
Regional Participation
Goal
HG8
Coordinate and integrate the City's pN:Jf;Yam with ather are«. housing
programs with regional housing efforts and with local housing and service
providers.
Policies
IIPG HP46 Policies and regulations related to affordable housing should be consistent
with CWPPs and multi-county policies.
~ HP47
Establish effective links with King County and other area cities to assess
need and create housing opportunities for low-income and special needs
households, and develop a housing program§ that addresses issues common
throughout the effiife region. I
Revised 200:! 2005
V-37
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
H¥44 HP48
Subject to availability of funds, participate in the production and periodic
update of a housing needs assessment for the City and the region ,to ensure
that policy is based upon a rational evaluation of housing needs and
priorities.
IIP4ð HP49 Ensure equitable and rational distribution of affordable housing throughout
the region that is compatible with land use, transportation, and employment
locations.
ImplementatieR efpelieies eeRtaifteå in the chapter ""ill eøG\H" ever a number of years
aRd is depefldem eR reSO\H"ees available to the City and the eeHll1'H:1flity. The follo'.ving
implementa-tieR strategy lists aGtiens that the City may take ia the future.
1. Develop an inventory of public prOflerties ne laRger Reeded for use ead WAiGh. FIHl)"
be available fer afføniableRol:lsiRg. Evaluate use of sHeR property for affordable
housing agaiRst all other competing publie Msea.
2. Inventory and report on the estimated RtH'FIber ef1:ll1its for eaeb ineeme segmeftt
fur purposes of Countywîde monitoriag øf eapaeity for housing do'¡elepmeRt.
3. Continue to monitor residential de'¡elepment OR an annual basis and determine the
total number efl'lewandredeveleped units receiviag permits, units constructed,
Rousing types, developed densities, and remaining eapa'oity for resideRtiaI.g'fe"fvth
based el'l il'lGome e&tegeries.
1. Conduct periedio surveys of housing ceRditim'ls to direct the heHsiag rehabilitation
programs.
5. De',relop strategies fer preteeting low income aaà very 10','l income housing that
may be lost due to redevelopmeat Of deteriorating housiag eoRditioos.
6. Develop guidelines, potefttially as subarea pleas, that req1:lire consistency with
specified ncighborheed eRaraeter and design req1::1iremeats.
7. Assign a City representative te partieipate with other ageaeies to ereate a
eomprehensive housing program that addresses issues Gemmon throughout the
entire regieR, aHd te seek ÐRd åeyelop fl:ffidiag epportunities and strategies.
&. Prepare I:lfld periedically update a housiag Reeds assessment.
9. The following is a men1::1 efpeteRtial development reg1::1Iation amendments that
should be considered:
Revised :!1m 2005
V-38
FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing
r Diversify housing forms and eneol:Jfage S1:lperiof design through
techniques such as incentives, pIaBfled t:mit developments, deasity
ÐOfl1:lSeS, afld tnm.sf.er of de'¡elopment rights. .
[' Create effective transitions bet\>'leefl tHe City Ceflter, businesses, and
residential areas.
[' MaJl:imize effieieaey of de'¡elopment processes.
[' Streamline processes for developmeflt eonsistent with the FVlCP afld
FWCC, and ensure they ha'¡e He significant adverse il'J')fiaets.
['
Efl6ol:H'8ge afførèableMld special needs Àol:lsiflg af'oood the City Ceater.
[' .^~def.lt ii!5efO let lifle stMldards.
[' RedH6e mifliFRl:lm residefltial lot sizes.
[' Establish ma,dm.wm 8:fld miflimtlffi requiremeRts for affordable housing
OR sites of signifieaftt size.
[' Eliminate barriers to uniførmIy siting special needs Àe1:lsiflg throughout
all residential areas.
[' Preclude conoentratioa of hömeless facilities. . u
1:\2004 Comprehensive Plan\2004 Update\City Council\Housing Chaper.doct5t912005 1: 14 PM
Revised ~ 2005
V..J9
MARCH 30, 2005
MEMORANDUM
TO
THE LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION
CO M M ITTE E
Please note that due to its bulk,
Exhibit 2 [Housing Chapter
Amendments presented to the LUTC]
and Exhibit B of 4 [Housing Chapter
Amendments presented to the
Planning Commission] are not
included in the City Council packet,
but is available in the City Council
Confe'rence Room)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMO RAND UM
March 30,.2005
To:
Jack Dovey, Chair
Land UselTransportation Conunittee (LUTe)
DavidM~ . .
Kathy McClung, Director ofConununity Development Services ~
Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner ~
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
MEETING DATE: . April 18, 2005
I.
BACKGROUND
The 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments includes the following three components:
I. Puget Center Partnership Request - Request ITom the Puget Center Partnership to
change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of
South 312111 Street and east of 1 it Avenue South from Professional Office (PO) to
Neighborhood Business (BN) (Exhibit 1).
2. Housing Chapter Update - Update of "Chapter 5, Housing," oCtIle FederalWay
Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) (Exhibit 2).
3. Kitts Comer Request - Request from Jon Potter to change the comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of approximately 46 acres ITom Business Park (BP) to
Conununity Business (Be) and Multi-Family (RM 2400) (Exhibit 3). (This request
will be presented to the LUTC on May 2, 2005, and a staff report will be provided to
you approximately one week prior to the meeting.)
Attached are the following:
1. Exhibit 4 - March 15,2005, Staff Report to Planning Conunission with Exhibits A-F
.2. Exhibit 5 - March 23, 2005, Planning Commission Minutes
II. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
2/19/05 Issuance of Detennination of Nonsignificance pursuant to the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEP A)
LandlUse Transportation Committee
2004 Comprebensive Plan Update
3/07/05 End ofSEPA Comment Period
3/21/05 End of SEP A Appeal Period
3/23/05 Public Hearing before the Planning Commission
4/18/05 Presentation to LUTCon Puget Center Partnership Request and ChapterS, Housing
5/2/05
Presentation to LUTC on Kitts Comer
5/17/05 City Council Public Meeting
6/7/05
Second City Council Public Meeting and Adoption of ordinance
III. SITE-SPECIFIC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE
l.
Background -
In September 2003, the City received one site-specific request for a comprehensive plan
amendment and rezone.. Paul Benton, on behalf of the Puget Center Partnership, submitted a
request to amend the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of
South 312th Street and east of 1st A venue South from Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood
Business (BN) (Exhibit I). .
2~
Summary -
File Number:
Parcel No's: .
Location:
Size:
Applicant:
Owner:
Request:
Existing
Comprehensive Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Requested
Comprehensive Plan:
Requested Zoning:
3.
00-104926-00 UP
082104-9074,082104-9076 & 082104-9167
North of South 312th Street. and east of 1 st Avenue South (Exhibit 6)
4.03 acres
Paul Benton on behalf ofPuget Center Partnership
Same
Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning from
Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN)
Professional Office
. Professional Office (PO)
Neighborhood Business
Neighborhood Business (BN)
Public Comments Received Prior to Planning Commission Public Hearing -
a)
Telephone call from Della Giesler, the property owner at 140 South 312th. Ms. Giesler was
interested in obtaining more information about the request.
b)
March 2, 2005, email from Greg Fewins, Deputy Director ofConununityDeveIopment
Services, concerning telephone call from Roddy Nolton (Exhibit 7).
Lançl/Use Transportation Conunittee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
March 30, 2005
Page 2
c)
March 4,2005, letter from Robert Roper, President, Mirror Lake Residents' Association
(Exhibit 8). .
4.
Staff Recommendation -
Staff recommends that tþe Puget Center Partnership request to change the comprehensive plan
designation and zoning from Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN) be
granted. .
5.
Public Testimony Provided to Planning Commission ~
During the Planning Commission public hearing, Bob Roper testified on behalf of the Mirror
Lake Residents' Association. He stated that the Association had a number of concerns (Exhibit
8), chief of which was the impact on Mirror Lake's water quality.
6.
Planning Commission Recommendation on Puget Center Partnership Request-
During the Planning Commission hearing, the owner, Paul Benton, submitted a letter (Exhibit 9)
to the Planning Commission which stated that as a condition of receiving the BN comprehensive
plan designation and zoning, he would deed restrict the property from being used as a bar,
tavern, cocktail lounge, adult bookstore, adult video store, or other adult entertainment business,
and for the renting, leasing, or selling of any boat, motor vehicle, or trailer. The Planning
Commission recommended approval of the comprehensive plan amendment and rezone from
Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood (BN) based on a five to one (5-1) vote on condition
that the deed restriction was placed on the property (Exhibit 5). As can be seen fiomthe
following table, of the restricted uses proposed by Me. Benton, only bar, tavern, or cocktail
lounge is allowed if!. the BNzone.
Use Neighborhood Business ProCessional Office
Office use X X
Retail (grocery, produce, drugs, personal care,
books, liquor, hardware, garden, retail nursery'
stock, household goods, funùshings;clothing, X
variety, home electronics, sporting goods, works of
art) (40 000 SQ. ft. tNx-)
Bank & relatedfmancial service (40,000 sq. ft. X
max)
Retail providing laundry, dry cleaning, beauty! X
barber, video rental, shoe repair (40,000 sq. ft. max)
Private lodge or club (10,000 sq. ft. max) X
Art gallery X
Restaurant or tavern (7,500 sq. ft. max.) X
Fast food restaurant (5,000 sq. ft.) . X
Health Club (25,000 sq. ft. max) X
Retail providing entertainment, recreational, or X
cultural services & activities (25,000 sq. ft. max)
Vehicle service station or car wash X
LandlUse Transportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
March 30, 2005
Page 3
Use Neighborhood Business ProCessional Office
Retail providing vehicle service or repair (within an X
enclosed buildinl!)
School X X
Day care facility (except Class II home occupation) X X
. Multi-unit (stacked) housing (not on the ground X
floor) (18 dulacre)
Group home Type nl-A2 X
Gr~up home Typ~ II-B) X
Social services transitional hous~g,4 Type As X
Social services transitional housing, Type 86 X
I
GoV'enunent facility X X
Public transit shelter X X
Public utility X X
Public park X X
Personal wireless service facility X X
Church X
7.
Land Use/rransportation Committee Options ~
The Committee has the following options:
1.
Reconunend that the full Council accept the Planning Conunission)
reconunendation and adopt an ordinance approving the request by the Puget Center
Partnership to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located
north of South 312 th Street and east of lIt Avenue Southtrom Professional Office (PO) to
Neighborhood Business (BN) based on the recording of a deed restriction.
I Group home type II means housing for juveniles under the jurisdiction of the criminaljustice system. Such groups include state-
licensed group care homes or halfway homes for juveniles who provide residence in lieu of sentencing or incarceration, halfway
houses providing residence to juveniles needing correction, or for those selected to participate in state-operated work release and
rre-release programs.
Group homes type II-A: Maximum number of 12 residents including resident staff.
3 Group homes type II-B: Thirteen or more residents including residential staff. Maximum number detennined on a case-by-case basis.
4 Social service transiti9nal housing means facilities other than offices and group homes, operated by a nonprofit social service
agency, licensed as required by the state; providing temporary and transitional housing to individuals on an as-needed basis
including, but not limited to, emergency shelters, homeless shelters; and other such crisis intervention facilities. This classification
includes domestic violence shelters as defined herein, except that such shelters wherein the total number of residents does not
exceed the maximum num~er allowed under the "family" definition, may be pennitted outright in all residential zones.
S Social service transitional housing Type A: Maximum number of residents to be consistent with the maximum number of
unrelated adults allowed under the zoning definition of family. '
6 Social service transitional housing Type B: All social service transitional housing not meeting the definition of "Type A,"
above. Maximum number detennined on a case-by-case basis.
.The limitation ort the number of residents in social service transitional housing shall not be applied ifit prohibits the City from
making reasonable acconunodationstô disabled persons in order to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a
dwelling as required by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988,42 USC 3604{f){J){b).
Land/Use Transportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
March 30, 2005
Page 4
2
Recommend that the full Council modify the Planning Commission's
recommendation and adopt an ordinance approving the request by the Puget Center
Partnership to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located
north of South 312th Street and east of 1st Avenue South from Professional Office (PO) to
Neighborhood Business (BN) with no conditions.
3.
Recommend that the full Council disapprove the request by resolution, retaining the
Professional Office (PO) comprehensive plan designation and zoning.
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 5, HOUSING
L
2.
Summary of Amendments-
In addition to new language, existing sections have been rearranged to improve the functioning
of the chapter. The following summarizes only substantive changes:
a)
Page V-5. The section on Countywide Policies has been moved from page V -3 to page V-5
and revised to more clearly describe the goals of the Countywide Planning Polices relating
to the provision of affordable housing.
b)
Pages V-6 - V-24. 5.2 Federal Way and its Housing - This section has been updated based
on different sources such as the 2000 Census, the April 2004 Office of Financial
Management Population Estimates, Northw~t Multiple Listing, and Dupre + Scott.
c)
Page V-21. The Housing Capacity section has been revised to identify ways of increasing
capacity to meet the City's housing targets.
d)
Page V-22 - V-24. Language has been added to describe how zoning and development
regulations may be amended to encourage additional market housing, and affordable and
special needs housing.
e)
Proposed changes to policies are summarized in the table on the f~llowing page.
f)
Pages V-38 - V39. 5.5 Implementation Actions has been deleted since it is a duplication of
some of the policies. .
Planning Commission Recommendation ~
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed changes to the. Housing
Chapter with the following two further amendments proposed by staff during the March 23,
2005, meetin~ (Exhibit 2): -
a)
Replace the wording of the new HP1S as follows:
ModifY :i58tflag and subdivisioR r-egulations to ensure that land is used effieieatly, that the
fegtilaâofl5 reflect eUffent safety needs, aad that they permit and ßncel:H't\ge eonstruatieR of
a bread range efhousing types. .'
Land/Use Transportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
March 30, 2005
Page 5
Review zoning. subdivision. and development rel!Ulations to ensure that they further
housinl! policies and do not create unintended bárriers. This is of particular importance for
small lot and cottal!e housinl! developments. In order to facilitate small lot and cottal!e
housinl! developments. it is particularlv important to revise. as necessarv. the subdivision
and development re!!Ulations that I!ovem their development.
b)
Delete Policy HP21 because it is a duplicate of HP22.
~ Continue to previåe iaeentives,'sHeh as density ÐoFluses, fer f)fØviEliRg a portieR of
aft'or4able housing in new developments.
HP22 Continue to provide incentives such as densitv bonuses for multi-family housing.
and expand the types of incentives offered to encourae:e new developments to include
affordable housing.
3.
Land Use/Transportation Committee Options -
TheConunittee has the following options:
1. LReconunendthat the full Council accept the Planning Conunission' s
reconunendation and adopt an ordinance approving the amendments to Chapter 5, Housing~
2.
Reconunend thatthe full Council modifY, then adopt the Planning Conunission's
reconunendatiori by ordinance.
Land/Use Transportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
. March 30, 2005
Page 6
Increase Diversify Increase Encourage Provide for Address Increase ' Encourage Improve Delete
Housing Housing Affordable Innovative Special Needs Compatibility Open Space Mixed-Use Wording Policy
Capacity aousing Housing Housing , Between Diverse in Developments in
Housing Developments Commercial
Areas
Amend Amend Amend Amend Amend new HP38 Add newHP13 Add new Amend new HP 18 New Delete
existing existing new HP3 existing HP19 HP5 existing
HPI HPl HPI Policy HP2
Add new Add new Add new Add new HP39 New Delete
HP14 HP15 HP21 HP12 existing
HP14.
Include
language in
new HP17
Amend Add new Amend Amend new HP41 New Delete
newHP17 HP17 new HP25 HP20 existing
HP15
Add new Amend new HP43 ~ew Delete
HP26 HP24 existing
HP19.
Include
language in
new'HP 21.
Amend Delete existing New Delete
new HP27 HP38 & HP40 HP34 existing
Add language to HP38
new HP45 to
address these
Dolicies
. Add new New Delete
HP28 HP35 . existing
HP40
Amend
new HP32 '
LandlUse Transportation Committee
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
March 30,2005
Page 7
v.
COUNCIL ACTION
Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Article IX, "Process VI Review," any
amendments to the comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan designations map, or zoning text must
be approved by the City Council based on a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Per
FWCC Section 22-541, after consideration of the Planning Commission report, and at its discretion
holding its own public hearing, the City Council shall by majority vote of its total. membership take
the following aètion:
I.
2.
3.
4.
Approve the amendments by ordinance;
Modify and approve the amendments by ordinance;
Disapprove the amendments by resolution; or
Refer the amendments back to the Planning Commission for further proceedings. If this
occurs, the City Council shall specify the time within which the Planning Commission
shall report to the City Council on the amendments.
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit I
Exhibit 2
Exhibit 3 .
Exhibit 4
Exhibit 5
Exhibit 6
Exhibit 7
Exhibit 8
Exhibit 9
Puget Center Partnership Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone
Proposed Amendments to FWCP Chapter 5, "Housing"
Kitts.Comer Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone
March J5, 2005, StafIReport to Planning Cotnnússion with Exhibits A-F
March 23, 2005, Planning Commission Minutes
Vicinity Map - Puget Center Partnership Site-Specific Request
March 2, 2005, Email from GregFewins, Deputy Director of Community Development
Services, Concerning Telephone Call from Roddy Nolton
March 4,2005, Letter from Robert Roper, President, Mirror Lake Residents' Association
March 23, 2005, Letter from Paul Benton
1;\2004 Comprehensive Plan\2004 Update\LUTC\041805 StatfReport to the LUTCdod313012005 3;51 PM
Land/Use Transportation Committee .
2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
March 30, ZOOS
Page 8
EXHIBIT 4
~
aTY OF" -";7
Federal Way
EXH IB IT "
,PAGE-LOF , It
MEMO RAND UM
March 15, 2005
To:
John Caulfield, Chair. City of Federal Way Planning Commission
Kathy McClung, Director of Conununity Development Services \11."-
Margaret H. Clark, AICP. Senior Planner {)\.A.tL: "
FROM:
SUBJECT:
2004 .comprehensive Plan Amendments
MEETING DATE: March 23,2005
, I.
BACKGROUND
Federal Way adopted its comprehensive plan in 1995 and updated it in Decembe( 1998, December
2000, November 2001, March 2003, and July 20,2004. The Growth Management Act (GMA)
limits plan updates to no more than once per year, except under the following circumstances:
~. The initial adoption of a sub-area plan that does not modifY the comprehensive
plan policies and designations applicable to the subarea;
2. The adoption or amendment of a shoreline master program.
3. The amendment of the capital facilities element of a comprehensive plan that
occurs concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a 'county or city budget.
Except as otherwise provided above, the governing body shall consider all proposals concurrently
so the cumulative effect of the various proposals can be ascertained. However, after appropriate
public participation, a county or city may adopt amendments or revisionS to its comprehensive plan
that confonn to this chapter whenever an emergency exists, or to resolve an appeal of a
comprehensive plan filed with a growth management hearings board or with the court.
II.
2004 .cOMPREflENSIVE PLAlIJ AMENDMENTS
The 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments includes the following three components:
1. Puget Center Partnership Request - Request from the Puget Center Partnership to change the
comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 'acres located north of South 3 12th Street
and east of 1st Avenue South from Professional Office (pO) to Neighborhood Business (BN)'
(Exhibit A). '
Planning Commission Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March 15,2005
Page I
EXHIBIT, ~
PAGE-ÌOF JL
t .'.'
2. Housing Chapter Update - Update of"Chapter 5, Housing," of the Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) (Exhibit B).
3. Kitts Comer Request - Request from Jon Potter to change the comprehensive plan designation
and zoning of approximately 46 acres from Business Park (BP) to Conununity Business (Be)
and Multi-Family (RM 2400).
The Planning Cor:nmission will conduct a public hearing on only the first two items-Puget'Center
Partnership Request and the amendments to the'Housing Chapter. The Planning Conunission has
already held a public hearing on September 19,2001, on the Kitts Comer request. However, it is
being included in the current comprehensive plan amendments since the Council has not yet acted
on the request.
III.
REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, "Zoning," Article IX, "Process VI Re~ew:'
establishes a process and criteria for comprehensive plan amendments. Consistent with Process VI
review, the role of the Planning Commission is as follows: '
1. To review and evaluate the requests for comprehensive plan amendments;
2. To deteIDÚne whether the proposed comprehensive plan amendments meets the
criteria provided by FWCC seCtions 22-529 and 22-530, and 22-488(c); and,
3. To forward a recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption of the
proposed comprehensive plan amendments.
IV.
PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
2/19/05 Issuance ofDeteIDÚnation ofNonsignificance pursuant to the State Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) .
3/07/05 End ofSEPA Conunent Period
3121/05 End of SEP A Appeal Period
3/23/05 Public Hearing before the Planning Commission
'v.
, SITE-SPECIFIC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE
In September 2003, the City received one site-specific request for a comprehensive plan
amendment and rezone. Paul Benton on behalf of the Puget Center Partnership submitted a request
to amend the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of South. .
312& Street and east oft It A venue South from Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business
(BN) (Exhibit A).
Planning Commission Memorandum
. 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March 15,2005
Page 2
EXHIBIT If
PAGE ~OF ..!..2a-
File Number:
Parcel No's:
Location:
Size:
Applican~:
Owner:
Request:
00-104926-00 UP
082104-9074,082104.9076 & 082104-9167
North of South 31 tit Street and east of 1st Avenue South (Exhibit C)
4.03 acres -
Paul Benton on behalf of Puget Center Partnership
Same
Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning from
Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN)
Existing.
Comprehensive Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Requested -
ComprebelJ-Sive Plan:
Requested Zoning:
Professional Office
ProfessionaJ Office (PO)
Neighborhood Business
Neighborhood Business (BN)
Public Comments
Received:
1. Telephone call from Della Giesler, the property owner at 140 South
312dt. Ms. Giesler was interested in obtaining more information.
about the request.
2. E-mail from Roddy Noltori (Exhibit D).
3. Letter from Robert Roper, President, Mirror Lake Residents i
Association (Exhibit E).
Background
The applicant is requesting BN zoning to build either a grocery store or a drug store. Their
application states that they have been diligently seeking a potential tenant to use this site as a
professional office for the last ten years (Exhibit A. Page 3 of 4). The applicant believes that there
is no demand for office use in this area. Moreover, they believe that there. is a change in the
residential shopping pattern with a desire to have shopping located within a convenient distance
(within one plus miles) ora residence (Exhibit F). - -
Comparison 01 Allowable Land Uses
A13 can be seen .from the following table, many more uses are allowed in the BN zone than in the
PO zone. However, the applicant has stated that they would like to develop either a grocery store
or drug store on the site.
Use - -Neighborhood Business Professional Office
Office use X X
Retail (grocery; produce, drugs, personal- care, books,
liquor, hardware, garden, retail nursery stock.
household goods, furnishings, clothing, variety, home X
electronics, sporting goods, works of art) (40,000 sq.
ft. wax)
Bank & related fwancial service (40,000 sq. ft.max) X
Retail providing iawutry, dry cleaning, beauty! barber,. ;
video rental, shoe repaÌr (40,000 sq. ft. max) X
Private lodge or dub (10,000 sq. ft. max) X
Planning Commission Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March 15. 2005
Page 3
EXHIBIT ~
PAGE~OF /2.
,
Use . Neighborhood Business Professional Office.
Art gallery X
Restaurant or tavern (7,500 sq. ft. max.) X
Fast food restaurant (5,000 sq. ft.) X
Health Club (25,000 sq. ft. max) X
Retail providing entertainment, recreational, or X
cultural services & activities (25,000 sq. ft. max)
Vehicle service'station or car wash. X
Retail providing vehicle service or repair (within an X
enclosed building) .
School X X
Day care fa~ility (exc.èpt Class ß home occupation) X X
Multi-unit (stacked) housirig (not on the ground floor) X
(18 dulacre)
Group home Type III-A2 X
Group home Type II-B3 X
Social services transitional housing,. Type As X
Social se~,ices transitional housing, Type g' ¡ X
Government facility X X
Public transit shelter X X
.
Public utility X X
Public park X X
Personal wireless service facility X X
Church X
I Group home type II means housing for juveniles under the jurisdiction of the criminal justice system. Such groups include state-
licensed group care homes or halfway homes for juveniles who provide residence in lieu of sentencing or incarceration, halfway
hoUSèS providing residence to juveniles needing correction, or for those selected to participate in state-operated work: release and
rre-release programs. .
Group homes type II-A: Maximum number of 12 residents including resident staff.
3 Group homes type II-B: Thirteen or more residents including residential staff. Maximum number detennined on a case-by-case basis.
. Social service transitional housing means facilities other than offices and group homes, operated by a nonprofit social service
agency, licensed as required by the state, providing temporary and transitional housing to individuals on an as-needed basis
including, but not limited to, emergency shelters, homeless shelters, and other such crisis intervention facilities. This
classification includes domestic violence shelters as defined herein, except that such shelters whereìn the total number of
residents does not exceed the maximum number allowed undtr the "family" definition, may be pennitted outright in all
residential zones.
S Social service transitional housing Type A; Maximwn number of residents to be consistent with the maximum number of
unrelated adults allowed under the zoning definition of family.
6 Social service transitional housing Type B: All social service trans~tional housing not meeting the definition of "Type A,"
above. Maximum number detennined on a case-by-case basis.
The limitation on the number of residents in social service tranSitional housing shall not be applied ifit prohibits the City tTom
making reasonable acconunodations to disabled persons in order to afford such person equal opportUnity to use and enjoy a .
dwelling as required by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, 42 use 3604(f)(3)(b). -
. Planning Commission Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
. March 15,2005
Page 4
EXHIBIT ~ .
PAGE--5-0F 12.
Neighborhood Characterisücs
The Puget Center Partnership property is presently vacant. The adjacent use to the. north is a
single-family development, Parkwood Campus, which was constructed after incorporation of the
City in 1990. The adjacent use to the east is also single-family. The use to the south across South
312/h is a multi-family complex (Greystone Meadows Apartments), and across the street to the
west are a 7-11 convenience store and Papa John's Pizza on the earner, with vacant land further to
the north.
Sensitive Areas
The City's Wetland Inventory has identified a small (500-2,500 .square feet) unregulated wetland
on the southern portion of the site. At the time that a development is proposed on the site, any
environmentally sensitive areas that may be impacted must be identified and any impacts mitigated
as part of the project-specific environmental review process. -
Drainage
These parcels are located within the Mirror Lake Basin, which has been experiencing flooding
problems. FWCC Chapter 21, - "Surface and Stormwater Management," has adopted the King
County Surface Water Design Ma!lual (KCSWDM), the Federal Way Addendum to the
KCSWDM, and the King County Stonnwater Pollution Control Manuizl.(BMP Manual). In
combination, these regulations apply to all existing development, new development, and
redevelopment Regulated development includes all single-family residential development;
projects that add 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious surface; collection and .
concentration of surface and stormwater runoff from a drainage area of more than 5,000 square
feet; projects which contain or directly discharge to a floodplain, stream, lake, wetland, or closed
depression, groundwater discharge area, or other water quality sensitive area; or redevelopment of
property which drains or discharges to a receiving waterthat has a documented water quality
problem. Development of this site for any use, whether under PO or BNzoning, will have to meet
the requirements of the KCSWDM, the Federal Way Addendum to the KCSWDM, and the BMP
Manual. In addition, the property is located within a Level 3 Flow Control Basin, which means
that a level 3 downstream analysis is required as described in Section 3.1.2 of the KCSWDM.
Water quality for the site must also be met through the use of technologies listed in the resource
stream: protection menu, section 6.1.3 of the 1998 KCSWDM. .
Access
The Puget Center Partnership parcel is bordered on the west by 1 st A venue South and on the south
by South 312/h Street Metro Routes 178 (peak-hour) and 901 (all-day) provide service along
South 31th, south of the Puget Center Partnership site.
Potential Traffic Impacts
In general, office use generates more employees but fewer customers per square foot than retail
uses. Under the existing PO zoning, a two-story 56,000 square foot office could be constructed on
the 4.03-acre site. This would result in .142 peak hour trips. In comparison, a freestanding 30,000 .
square foot grocery store would generate 231 peak hour trips and a combination 15,000 square
foot drug store and 15,000 square foot retail store providing laundry, dry cleaning, or beauty!
barber services would generate 170 peak trips. When the Puget Center Partnership parcel is
developed, traffic mitigation, including specific street improvements, would be assessed.
Planning Commission Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March 15,2005
Page 5
EXHIBIT~
PAGE-1LOF 12.
Projections for Population and Employment, '
The site is presently zoned PO, which does not allow residential development. A change to BN
should have no impact on the number of people who could reside on the site if a grocery store or
drug store is constructed as statep by the applicant. However the BN zone also allows multifamily
development on upper floors at a density of 18 dwelling \fnits per acre. '
Need for Additional Neighborhood Business Zones .
A Market Study prepared for the City in 2000 found that the City has enough capacity designated
for different uses to accommodate the 20-year employment forecast. However, while there is
adequate land for employment growth in the aggregate, several districts achieve more than 50
percent buildout. These are Neighborhood Business (BN), City Center Frame (CC-F), Corporate
Park (CP-I), and Professional Office (PO). There has been only one medical office developed in
the PO zone since incorporation of the City in 1990; however, the BN zone has experienced both
new development and redevelopment of existing parcels. Examples include Metropolitan Market
at Dash Point Road and SW 312th S!!eet and the Hoyt Road Retail at Hoyt Road and SW 340th
Street.
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies
The overall vision of the comprehensive plan is to provide an appropriate balance of services~
employment, and housing. This comer was designated PO to provide for small-scale office
development compatible with adjacent residential neighborhoods; however, the site has not
developed in over 10 years. '
The request for a BN designation is consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan
, (FWCP). Page 11-22 of the FWCP ,states that, "Neighborhood Business areas are intended to .
provide. convenient goods (e.g., groceries and hiudware) and services (e.g., dry cleaners, dentist,
bank) at a pedestrian and neighborhood scale close to adjacent residential uses."
VI.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS 1'0 CHAPTER 5, HOUSING
I. Housing Chapter Update .
The following tasks were completed in order to update Chapter 5, «Housing" of the, FWCP:
(a) Data Collection - Existing data sources such as 2000 Census, Office of Financial,
Management, Central Puget Sound Real Estate Report, King County Housing
Authority, Assessor's records, Dupre + Scott, Multiple Listing Service, King County -
Benchnmrk Program, and adopted housing targets were reviewed.
(b) Interviews - hidividuaIs and agencies representing a broad range of community
perspectives on the development and atfordability of housing, community
development needs, and other resource needs were interviewed. .
(c) Data Analysis'- Information trom the data analysis and interviews was analyzed to
detennine existing inventory and projected needs.
(d) Implementation - Strategies and mechanisms for providing housing were identified.
Planning Commission Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March IS, 2005
Page 6
. "
EXHIBIT ~"
PAGE , OF-L6-
2. Summary of Amendments.
In addition to new language, existing sections have been rearranged to improve the
functioning of the chapter. The following summarizes only substantive changes:
(a) Page V-5. The section on Countywide Policies has been moved from page V-3 to
page V -5 and revised to more clearly describe the goals of the Countywide Planning
Polices relating to the provision of affordable housing.
(b) Pages V-6 - V-24. 5.2 Federal Way and its Housing - This section has been updated
based on different sources such as the 2000 Census. the April 2004. Office of
Financial Management Population Estimates, Northwest Multiple Listing, and
Dupre + Scott.
(c) Page V..21. The Housing Capacity section has been revised to identify ways of
increasing capacity to meet its housing targets. .
(d) Page V-22.... V-24. Language has been added to describe how zoningand
development regulations may be amended to encourage additional market housing,
and affordable and special needs housing.
(e) Proposed changes to policies are summarized in the table on the following page.
(f)
Pages V-38 ~ V39. 55 Implementation Actions has been deleted since it is a
duplication of some of the policies.
VII.
COMPLIANCE WITH FWCC SECfroNS 22-529 AND 22-530
1. Section 22-529. Factors to "be Considered in a Comprehe1JSive Plan Amendment - The City
may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors when considering a proposed
. amendment to the comprehensi,:,e plan:
(1) The effect upon the physical environment.
Amending "Chapter 5, Housing:' of the FWCp. is a non~project action and would havè
no effect on the physital environment. Development is not proposed in conjunction with
the request by Puget Center Partnership for a change in comprehensive plan designation
and zoning from Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Bus~ess (BN). Any
proposed development on the site will.be subject to environmental review as required by
the. SEP A Rules. and will be evaluated in accordance with all plans, policies. rul~s. and
regulations adopted as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under SEP A to
approve, condition. or deny proposed actions.
(2) The effect on open space, streams," and lakes.
Amending "Chapter 5, Housing:' of the FWC:P and the Puget Center Partnership
request fOl: a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone are non-project actions and
would have no effect on open space, streams. and lakes.
Planning Commission Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March 15,2005
Page 7
Increase Diversify Increase Encourage Provide for Address Increase Encourage Mixed- Improve Delete Policy
Housing Housing Affordable Innovative Special Needs Compatibility Open Space Use Developments Wording
Capacity Housing Housing Housing Between Diverse in in Commercial
Housing, Developments Areas
Amend Amend Amend Amend new lIP39 ' Add new HP13 Add new Amend new HP 18 New Delete existing
existing existing new HP3 HPI9 HP5 Policy HP2
HPI HPI
Add new Add new Add new Add new HP40 New Delete existing
HP14 HP15 HP22 HP12 HP14. 'Include
language in new
BPI?
Amend Amend Modify Amend new HP42 New Delete exi$ting
newHPl? new new HP26 HP20 HP15
HPI7
Add new Delete existing 'New
HP27 HP38 &HP40 HP23
Add language to
new HP45 to
address these
policies
Modify Amend n~ HP46 New
new HP28 HP3S
Add new New
¡ HP29 ' . HP36
~m
C)(
[:!:
L'~
0
..,
Planning Commission Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Marc:h 15,200
, Page
EXHIBIT ~
PAGE-LOF~
. .
(3) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods.
Amending "Chapter 5, Housing," of the FWCP will have no direct effect on development
witlùn the CitY. However, code amendments adopted in order to implement goals and
policies of Chapt~r 5 may result in development. At the time of any development, the
compatibility and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods will be
. evaluated. Any development resulting from a (BN designation on the Puget Centçr
Partnership site should be compatible with adjacent land uses, including surrounding
single-family uses, since the intent of the BN zone is to provide convenient goods and
services at a pedestrian and neighborhood scale close to adjacent residential uses,
. (4) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public
transportaJion, parks, recreation, and schools.
Amending the Housing Chapter is a non:-project action. Thereforç, any amendments to
the chapter would not impact community facilities such as utilities, parks, recreation,
and schools. If the Puget Center site-specific request is granted, specific impacts
associated with development will be evaluated at the time that a development perIi1Ìt is
applied for, and any potential adverse impacts will be mitigated at that time.
(5) The benefit to the neighborhood, city, and region.. .
Am~nding the Housing Chapter to provide for a diverse range of housing, including
affordable housing, that is compatible with neighborhood character and meets the City's
design guidelines, will benefit thè Ffeighborhood, City, and region, while also meeting
the adopted housing targets. Granting the Puget Center Partnership's request for a BN
designation for their si.te may result in the development of a previously vacant site as
either a grocery store or a drug store, thereby providing setVÌces for the surrounding
neighborhood and contributing to the econooúc development of the City.
(6) The quantity and location of land planned for theproposed land use type and density
. and the demand for such land.
Amending thè Housing Chapter is a non-project action, which will not in ,itse.lf affect
land uses. Subsequent amendments intended to implementgoals and policies of the
Housing Chapter may include amendments to the development regulations and
comprehensive land use map. The applicant is requesting BN zoning to build either a
groeèry store or a drug store. Their application states that they have been diligently
seeking a potential tenant to use this site as a professional office for the last ten years
(Exhibit A). The applicant believes that there is no demand for office use in this area.
Moreover, they believe that there is a change in the residential shopping pattern with a
d~ire to have shopping located ~thin a convenient distance (within one plus oúles) of
a. residence, In.addition, based on the July 2000 Market Analysis, the BN mne was
anticipated to build out by 75 percent over the 2000-2020 period. This was the second
highest build out rate for a commercial zone after the City Center Frame.
(7) The cutrent and projected population density in the area. .
Amending the Housing Chapter is a non-project action; therefore, this criterion is not
applicable. The Puget Center Partnership site is presently zoned PO, which does not
allow residential development. A change to BN should have no impact on the number of
people who could reside onthe site if a grocery store or drug store is constructed as
stated by the applicant. However the BN zone also allows multifamily development on
upper floors at à density of 18 dwelling units per acre.
Planning Cc?uunÎssÎon Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March 15,2005
. Page 9
EXHIBIT 4-
PAGE- ,.~
(8) The effect upon other aspects of the comprehensive plan.
Implementation of the goals and policies of the Housing Chapter may result in increased
housing capacity which would result in changes to "Chapter 2, Land Use," of the FWCP
in a future comprehensive plan amendment cycle. Granting a change in comprehensive
plan designation and zoning from PO to BN should not affect other aspects of the
comprehensive plan.
2.
Section 22-530. Criteria for Amending the Comprehensive Plan ~ The City may amend the
comprehensive plan only 'if it finds that:
(I) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relatiohship to public health. safety, or
welfare. - -
Amending the Housing Chapter to provide for a diverse range of housing, including
affordable housing, bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare
because it may result in a more stable environment for families. Designating the Puget
Center Partnership site as BN may result in development of the site, which should
benefit the surrounding area. -
AND
(2) The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the city.
Please see response under (1), above.
(3) The,proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36. 70A and with
the portion of the city's adopted plan not affected by the amendment.
RCW Chapter 36.70A.O20(4) of the Growth Management Act, encourages the
availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state,
provision of a variety of residential densities and housing types, and preservation of
existing housing stoCk Granting a aN d,esignation to the Puget Center Partnership is
, consistent With RCW 36.70A.O20(5), which states that the economic developments goal
~ to, II Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with
adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizeris of this state,
especially for unemployed and'for disadvantaged persons, promote the retention and
expansion of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses, recognize regional
differences impacting economic development opportunities, and encourage growth in
areas experiencing insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the state's
natural resources, public services', and public facilities."
VIII.
COMPLIANCE WITH FWCC SECfION 22-488(c)
Site-specific requests are required to be evaluated for compliance with this section.7
1)
The city may approve the application only if it finds that:
7 This section applies only to site-speCific requests; therefore, it applies only to the puget Center Partnership request and not the
proposed wnendments to the Hol\sing Chapter.
'planning Conuni$ion Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
March 15, 2005
Page 10
EXHIBIT- -4 -
PAGE < "~
a.
The proposed request is in the best interests of the residents of the city;
Designating the Puget Center Partnership site as BN may result in development of the
site, which should benefit the surrounding area. -
AND
b.
The proposed request is appropriate becQuse either:
1.
Conditions in the immediate vicinity of the subject property have so significantly
changed since the property was given its present zoning that, under those changed
conditions, a change in designation is within the public interest.
Land uses in the immediate vicinity of the Puget Center Partnership site have not
significantly changed during the last five years. ,The adjacent use to the north is a
single-fatIÚly development, Parkwood Campus, which was constructed after
incorporati°I! of the City in 1990. The adjacent use to the east is also single-family.
The use to the south across South 312111 is a multi-family complex (Greystone -
Meadows Apartments), and across the stieet to the west are a 7-11 convenience
store and Papa John's Pizza on the comer, with vacant land further to the north.
However, a change in designation may be in the public interest, since the applicant
states that they have been diligently seeking a potential tenant to use this site as a
professional office for the last ten years and have not received any interèSt.
OR
ii.
The change in designation will correct a designation that was inappropriate when
established.
Not applicable.
c.
It is consistent with the comprehensive plQn;
The request for a BN desígnationby the Puget Center Partnership is consistent with the
FWCP.Page IT-22 of the FWCP states that, "Neighborhood Business areas are intended
to provide convenientgoods (e.g., groceries and hardware) and services (e.g., dry
cleaners, dentist, bank) at a pedestrian and neighborhood scale close to adjacent
- residential uses." -
d.
It is consistent with Q// applicable provisions of the chapter, including those adopted by
rejërence from the comprehensive plan;
If the Puget Center Partnership request is approved and these parcels designated as BN,
any subsequent development would be required to be consistent with all applicable
provisions of this chapter (zoning code).
AND
e.
It is cQnsistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. .
Granting the requ~sted change from PO to BN is consistent with the policies in the
comprehensive plan and it is also consistent wi~h the public health, safety, and welfare.
Planning Commission Memorandum
2004 Comprehensive Plan-Amendments
March IS, 2005
Page 11
EXHIBIT ~ '
PAGE-1A.OF ~
Designating the Puget Center Partnership site as BN may result in development of the
site, which should benefit the surrounding area.
'.
2)
The city may approve an application for a quasi-judicial project related rezone only if it finds that:
c.
The criteria in subsection (l) above are met; AND
The proposed project complies with this chapter in all respects; AND
The site plan of the proposed project is designed to minimize all adverse impacts On
the developed properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property; AND
The site plan is designed to miniMize impacts upon the public services and utilities.
a.
b.
d.
This is a proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan, it is not a project-related rezone"
and therefore; the criteria under this section do not apply.
IX.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the proposed amendments to FWCP Chapter 5, "Housing" (Exhibit B) and
the site-specific request by the Puget Center Partnership to change the comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of South 31Zlh Street and eàst of I-I Avenue
South fr~m Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN) (Exhibit A) be approved.
'x.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Consistent with the provisions ofFWCC Section 22-539, the Planning Comnûssion may take the
following actions regarding the proposed comprehensive plan amendment:
- 1 Recommend to City Council adoption of the proposed comprehensive plan
'amendments as proposed;
2. Recommend to City Council that the proposed comprehensive plan amendments not
be adopted; '. .
3. Forward the proposed comprehensive plan amendments to City Council without a
recommendation; or
4. Modify the proposed comprehensive plan amendments and reconunend to City
. Council adoption of the amendment as modified.
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Puget Center Partnership Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone
Proposed Amendments to FWCP Chapter 5, "Housing" .
Vicinity Map - Puget Center Partnership Site-Specific Request
E-Mail Comment trom Roddy Nolton
Conunent Letter from Robert Roper on Behalf of the Mirror Lake Residents' Association
Letter trom Donald Barker, Powell Development Company
1:\2004 Comprehcru¡ive Plañ\2004 Updatc\Ptanning Commission\RcpQn to Planning Commision.doclO3tl6flOO5 8:32 AM
'March 15,2005
. Page 12
Planning Conunission Memorandum
.2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
EXHIBIT 5
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PLANNING COMMISSION
EXHIBIT ~
Me[ ~
March 23, 2005
~.m.
City Hall
CoWlciI Chambers
MEETING MINUTES
Commissioners present: John Caulfield, Hope Elder, Bill Drake, Dini Duclos, Merle Pfeifer, and Lawson
Bronson. Conunissioners absent: Dave Osaki (excused). Alternate Commissioners present: Pan Duncan-
Pierce. Alternate Conunissioners absent: Christine Nelson (excused) and Tony Moore (Wlexcused). Staff
present: Senior Planner Margaret Clark, Assistant City Attorney Amy Jo Pearsall, Consultant Betsy Clark,
and Administrative Assistant E. Tina Piety.
Chair Caulfield called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ApPROVAL OF MINUTES
It wasmls/c to.adopt the March 2, 2005, minutes as presented.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
None
ADMINISTRATIVE REpORT -
Ms. Piety infonned the Commission that the Annual Volllnteer Dinner is scheduled for April 22, 2005. This
year the City will be hosting a mystery dinner put on by the company that does the Murder Mystery Dinners
on the Dinner Train. It should be a lot of fun and she hopes all the Commissioners will be able to attend.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING - 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
The Commission first discussed the Site-Specific Request. Ms. Clark delivered the staff presentation; She
stated that the proposed amendment includes the Kitts Corner Site-Specific Request that the Commission
has already reviewed and therefore, is not part of this Public Hearing. The Site-Specific Request that is the
subject of this Public Hearing is Puget Center Partnership's application to amend the comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of South 312111 Street and east of 1st Avenue South from
Professional Office (PO) to Neighborhood Business (BN). The Commission had no questions for staff and
the Public Testimony was opened.
Don Barker - He is with Powell Development and is the developer for this project. He
commented that as Ms. Clark explained, any development would require mitigation. He has
worked on another project in the City and knows to expect strict requirements. He feels the
project will enhance the water quality of the area and will help control flooding. He believes the
K:\Planning Conmission12005\Mooting S"""""'Y Q]-23-OS,doc
Planning Commission Minutes
-IOOflBff 5 . . .
-PAGE 2. OF ',"b23,200~
City will require them to construct curb, gutter, and sidewalk, which will enhance pedestrian
activity in the neighborhood, He envisions this to be a neighborhood shopping center; a place
people can go to meet their neighbors for a cup of coffee. He stated they can give it an aesthetic
connection to the neighborhood, .
Page 2
Paul Benton - He represents the owner of the shopping center. He read a letter into the record.
In the letter, he states that he believes, "... that water quality and flooding issues will be
adequately addressed through current City rules and regulations," In addition, the letter states
they are willing to, "...deed restrict the property from being used as a bar, tavern, cocktail
lounge, adult bookstore, adult video store, or other adult entertainment business and for the
renting, leasing, or selling of any boat, motor vehicle, or trailer,"
Robert Burton - He is an Associate Bt:oker and has been in the real estate business for 38 years,
, In addition, he teaches corporate real estate at a local college. He has researched retail uses in
Federal Way. He conunented that a small shopping center draws from within one mile. He feels
this neighborhood would be better served by a small shopping center. He stated that the last
three grocery stores in Federal Way have gone into neighborhoods. .
Bob Roper - He is the President of the MiITor Lake Resident's Association. He commented that
BN is more intense than PO. He feels we have enough BN in the City. He doesn't agree with the
water quality standards used by the City. He feels the City should be using standards that deal
more with phosphates. In a recent Mirror Lake Resident's Association meeting, there was no
support for this rezone. '.
Don Barker - In response to a question trom a Conunissioner, he stated that they are talking to
retailers, but no one has signed on as yet.
Bob Roper - His conunents are in regard to the discussion the Conunission had regarding water
quality. He stated that ~e City uses the King County Surface Water Design Manual, which has
two" menus for pollution in lakes and streams. One menu deals mostly with zinc and the other
mostly with phosphates. While there is not a current problem, Micror Lake has the potential for a
serious problem with phosphates.
. There was nofurther public testimony on this issue.
Ms. Czark delivered the staff presentation on the update to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP)
Housing chapter. There is no major vision change. Staff has rearranged and condensed infonnation. In
addition, language was added regardmg possible methods to increase capacity, affordable housing, and
housing choice. Finally, two new sections were added on household size and housing cost and affordability.
Ms. Czark commented that Federal Way has the largest household size in South King County and close to
the highest median household income, but still has a large number of low income households. She went
over the policy changes and noted that HP22 should be deleted because HP21 says the same thing. In
addition, a heading, "Emergency and Transitional Housing," was added to HG6 because there was no
heading previously.
There was no public testimony on the Housing Chapter. Commissioner Duclos expressed her concern with
the transitional housing requirements and how she feels those requirements discriminate against people in
need of transitional housing by signaling them out for special requirements. The entire Conunission agreed
that sometime in the future they would like to review the requirements for transitional housing.
K:lPlonning ComrnissionUoo5\MCelÎn& Sun-rnary O].2J-{lS,doc
Planning Conunission Minutes
Page 3
~ .. M"rch 23,2005
PAGE3-0F -L-
. It was m/s/c to recommend to the City CoWlcil adoption of the propOsed comprehensive plan amendments
as drafted in the staff report, with the modification that Puget Sound Partnership's proposed deed
restrictions be put into place.. .
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
Ms. Clark infonned the Commission that the next meeting will be April 20th, at which time there will be a
public hearing on signs along Interstate-5.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
None.
ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 8:21 p.m.
K:\Planning CormUsionl200SlMecûng S~O3~23-OS.dac