The URL can be used to link to this page

11-1040511.CITY OF Federal Way November 7, 2011 James Kwon 153 SW 311' Street Federal Way, WA 98023 CITY BALL 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederal way. com RE: File #11-104051-00-UP; PROCESS I DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL Northmark Building Driveway, 200 South 333rd Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Kwon: The Community and Economic Development Department has completed review of your Process I Master Land Use application. You have proposed to construct an 18-foot-wide driveway connection between the two parking areas at an existing office building located at 200 South 333`d Street. Your application is hereby approved per the condition and findings noted below. Be advised work cannot be in until Yku receive en neering a roval from the Public Works Develo meat Services Division. Please contact Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer, at 253-835-2732 for information regarding engineering approval fees and requirements. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL two parking stalls removed for the driveway improvements to a 1. The applicant shall replace the location redlined on the approved site plan. 2. When construction is complete, the applicant shall schedule a final inspection with Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner, at 253-835-2638. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant is proposing to construct an 18-foot-wide driveway approximately 130 feet in length. The driveway will provide vehicular access between the subject property's north and south parking areas. The existing site layout provides no vehicular connections between the two parking areas. Single ingress/egress points for the north and south parking area are located on the 1" Avenue South and South 333d Street frontages, respectively. 2. The proposed site design requires the removal of two parking stalls in order to accommodate the driveway improvements. The existing total parking stall count does not meet current 30011 parking ratio standards for office use set forth in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.235.010. Updating the site to meet current standards will not be required as the proposed improvements do not exceed nonconforming development thresholds set forth in. FWRC 19.30.090, but the applicant will be required to maintain the existing number of stalls prior to constructing the driveway. As a condition of approval, the applicant will be required to replace the two parking stalls in the north parking lot as shown on the redlined site plan. 3. Approximately 13 mature trees are proposed to be removed to accommodate the new driveway. The Office Park (OP) tree retention requirement for the 1.44-acre subject property is 29 tree units (20 tree units per acre). The submitted certified ISA arborist report prepared by Tree Resource indicates the subject property will contain 72.5 tree unit credits following removal of the 13 trees; therefore, no tree replacement will be necessary. Mr. Kwon November 7, 2011 Page 2 4. Two parallel segmented retaining walls, less than six feet in height, are proposed along the driveway. The segmented blocks contain a weathered texture that satisfies the aesthetic requirement set forth in FWRC 19.120.120. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Use Process review is required as the proposed improvements do not meet exception criteria set forth in FWRC 19.15.020. 2. Process I "Directors Decision" is the appropriate Master Land Use application as the improvements are to a development site; and they do not exceed thresholds set forth in FWRC I9-15.030(1) 3. The Federal WaY Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation for the subject property is Office Park (OP). Pursuant to FWRC 19.235.010, the subject property's office use is permitted in OP zoning districts. 4. The proposed improvements meet Process I purpose criteria set forth in FWRC 19.55.020 including compliance with applicable provisions of FWRC Title 19 `Zoning and Development' and health, safety and welfare standards. 5. PubIic Works engineering approval is required prior to constructing the improvements as the new impervious surfaces are considered a regulated activity pursuant to FWRC 16.15.010. Stormwater impacts shall be mitigated using manuals and Best Management Practices set for in FWRC 16.20.010 et al. APPEALS The effective date of this decision is November 10, 2011. Pursuant to FWRC 19.55.050, any person who commented on the application or requests a copy of this administrative decision may appeal the decision to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner by November 24, 2011. Any appeal must be in the form of a letter delivered to the department with the established fee. CLOSING This land use decision does not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. This Process I approval does not constitute Public Works engineering approval. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner, at 253-835-2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Isaac Conlen Planning Manager for Patrick Doherty, Director C: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer 11-104051 Doe I.D 59223 TT RESOURCE Prepared By: Zeb Haney BCMA #PN-5840B Richard Shanebrook All American Tree Services 26401 Military Rd S Kent WA 98032 RE: Northmark Building Driveway — Tree Unit Survey Date: November 2, 2011 Attn: Richard Shanebrook Dear Mr. Shanebrook Assignment and Scope of Report You asked me to collect tree unit data for a tree survey required by the City of Federal Way for the Northmark Building Driveway project at 200 S 333�d Street, Federal Way WA 98023. This letter contains the original request from the city, (See appendix A), addressed to James Kwon, who hired you to handle the removal of the trees in the area where the driveway will be built, and the tree survey data that confirms that the project complies with city codes for tree retention. Observations and Discussion I met you on site on Wednesday November 2nd and we reviewed and edited a site map containing significant trees on the property. The trees consisted of Douglas -fir, Pacific willow, vine maple, European hornbeam, and Purple leaf plums. There are also large numbers of photinia, rhododendron, and viburnum shrubs. The City of Federal Way requires that a minimum of 29 tree units remain on the property. Trees are assigned a unit based on stem diameter with trees up to 6 inch diameter garnering 1 point and an additional half -point being given for trees in diameter classes grouped at 6 inch intervals. (See Appendix B) We surveyed all of the trees that will remain and calculated a total of 72.5 tree units. (See Appendix C) Conclusion Based on my measurements and inventory of the trees on site, there is a total of 72.5 tree units that will remain. The city requires 29 for this site so you are well above the quota required by the city and will not have to plant any additional trees to meet the city requirements. RESUB;MITTED NOV 0 3 2011 PO Box 25413 Federal Way WA 98093 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS 2 1 P a g e Northm ark Building Tree Units Appendix A — City Requirement Letter October 18. 2011 James Kwon 153 SW 31 Vh Street Federal Way, WA 98023 RE: file #11.104051.00-UP; MULti'7' F'OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Northmark Building Driveway, 200 South 3334 Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Kwon: The Community and Economic Development Department has received your Process 1 Master Land U.w application. You have proposed to construct an 18-foot-wide driveway connection between the two parking areas at an existing office building located at 200 South 333" Street. The submitted site plan details the need to remove approximately 13 trees, the construction of two parallel retaining walls along the length of the driveway, and permanent removal of two parking stalls. The department is unable to issue approval until the following items are addressed: Reductinu of Parking Stalls — The existing =1 proIxrwd harking stall count does not meet the 69 stall minimum required by Federal Way Rrav�ed Crm1c (1='WRC) 19.235.0101. Although the stall count is nonconforming now, it's likely to have met standards when the building was constntcled in 1979. The improvements you have proposed do not trigger the need to meet the current standards, but reduction of the nonconforming stall count cannot he approved at this time. The department recommends the following options if you proceed with the current layout: (1) replace the two stalls at another location on the subject property, or (2) submit a thorough parking study that c1 uments fewer stalls will be adequate to fully serve the office building. 2. Stormwater — The applicant will be required to implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) to mitigate the new impervious surfaces. Stormwater improvements must be designed to meet standards within the 2009 King Counte Surface Water Design Manual. Public Works Department Engineering (EN) approval must be obtained prior to cons(ruction. A scaled drawing detailing existing topography and drainage with the proposed improvement must be submitted. Current EN review fees are S271.00 for four hours of review and an inspection charge of $61.00 per hour may he assessed. Please contact Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer, at 253-835 2732 for information regarding stomtwaler requirements. Pursuant to i WRC 19.120.130, Office Parr, (t7P), ;eurnad prupe.rtics are reggt . to rna. minimum tree canopy density of 20 tree units per acre. Twe units are credits assigned to existing trees that will remain on the property after construction. The credits range from 1 credit for a tree measuring 1-inch in diameter at breast height (dbh) to 3 credits for a tree measuring 24 inches at dbh. A tree survey prepared by a registered landscape architect or King Cuunty records accesacd online on October 14, 2011, list the gross Ilaor area (GFA) of the building ai 20,626 square fe". Parking ratio requirements are I stall for each 300 square feel of GFA m ulring in 69 stalk. Tree Resource I Practicing Consulting Arborists I www.TreeResource.com Prepared by Zeb Haney 3 1 P a g e Northmark Building Tree Uuits Mr. Kwon Ocwber 18.2011 Page 2 caniFlzd arbarist detailing the existing tree canopy and suggested planting (if needed} to meet the is required to be submitted with the engineering document±,. Please find r e me tnfornu►tkmal handout regarding the city's tree retention standards. 4. Retaining Walla —Pursuant to FWRC 19.120.120, ruckories and retaining walls arc limited to six felt in height and must be composed of rock. trick. or a textured/pauerned wail. Please submit proposed wall heights and wall cornpositions with engineering documnts. CLOSING Please use the enclosed form when resubmitting rerltie�ted items. if you have aay questions regarding this letter please contact me at 253-833-2638, or matt.herremOcityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Matthew Herrera Associate Kroner enc: Bulletin 69 'free and WgrIalion Retention Requirements' Bulletin 129 `Resubmittalinhimwimn' c Ann tower. Senior Ettginerrinp Plam Reviewer ' King County records;imaatl online on October 14, 201 1. list the lot as 1.44 acres resulting in a tree unit requirement of 29 cmdits. 11 AUW51 Doc J.D.7W31 Tree Resource I Practicing Consulting Arborists I www.TreeResource.com Prepared by Zeb Haney 4 1 P a g e Northin ark Building Tree Units Appendix B — Calculating Tree Units J f D"eteta wror camwunrry Dxvmirmw rsxevtctra CRY 33325 96 Avenue South Federal Way, WA %003-6325 Federal Way 253-835-26M; Fax 25M35-2609 ��W �lsxatdlslsral � CALCULATING TREE UNITS (IN RS ZONES) (Chapter 19.120 Federal Way Revised Cade) ► To determine the minimum tree units required for your site: 43 560 Qd/acre) = x 25 (units/acre) _ (lot sire in square feet) (lot sire in acres) (minitnum tree units) Example: T Lot Size = 9,723 square feel 9,723143,560 = .22 acres .22 s 25 = 5.5 = 6 lree units IN, To determine number of existing or replacement tree units: Existing Trees Includes all trees except invasive species and hazard treys Tree Size (diameter at breast bd& 14.5') tl of Trees Tree Units Total Units 1 " to 6" dbh x 1.0 - ZS > 6" to 12" dhh z 2 x 1.5 = 33 > 12" to 18" dbh 'j x 2.0 = I y > 18" to 24" dbh x 2.5 > 24" dbh x 3.0 - T.W FrTree Uaitr Reptacemeat Trees Evergreen Trees - minimum 6' in height at planting Deciduous Trees - minimurn 2" caliper at planting Species Tree Units Small Canopy (mature canopy area <450 square feet) 0.5 Examples: Japanese Maple, Black Hawdwme, Western Crabapple Medium Canopy (mature canopy area 450- 1.250 square fen) I.0 EAaeples: Western White Pine, Choke Cherry, Honey lorust Large Canopy (mature canopy area > 1,250 square feu) 1.5 Examples: Douglas Fir, Tulip Tree, Western Red Cedar For a complete list of recommended replacement trees, see Bulletin #M Bulletin #073 -January I, 2011 Page I of 1 L andoanT&Wating 7Yee tlwts Tree Resource I Practicing Consulting Arborists I www.TreeResource.corn Prepared by Zeb Haney 5 1 P a g e Northmark Building Tree Units Appendix C - Tree Unit Data and Site Map ^ 7►ee Unit mve11t" Ma Spurr sin Chm tmw Tm I 7'1 (r°7b Om T2 Pary}eF&M 1'!e• 1 T3 P-*Wi>m r-Ir T4 pummudPm 1w 1 .5 pru}rb leaf OwN T6 P*m*m f pt+m 1'6• 1 17 pun*18dona Tb Prwpkeb rlP4un T9 g *wbfpm 6✓.tr 1B T10 pan* wdvb m 6'lr ID T11 PGq*mdpl® Tt2 pag ladP>ua+ 6"lr 18 T13 trorr,p.nrn 1'i' 1 1W 7 T14 TIS gtiap�aeYlan„br..m F�rptun hun�emr }"d' 1 Tt6 Hcn}+e6e3rxnh.+",n I'�' 1 1 rvrp,vn M,rNrsm 1"b" 1 M PatpaerM1xr,t,eam IW 1 T19 11aghvm3rum 1"d" 1 T20 Fuepwn k n+3xvm r-6, i T21 �ePrrlwnsewn n 1 hvraheear IW 1 Y73 172 P,eeparr wine 1`-C 1 TU 1 TM [.kmFFo..Sr 1•'6• 1 rAA [}wFJa•-fir 1'O• ] T18 i1,nrRl.n6+ ir-jr 2 T24 Lkryftr+•!rr 6'-lr 13 .13D 1r,xrglrslrr 1'6' 1 T31 r.kwxlar•iir 16•-26" 2-5 T32 rhw6ias6r 1Y-Ir 2 T33 i7vu_4.. ikl r1tr Ib T34 mm.gLwAr 6"dr 1.5 T33 57rwµk.-fi, 6'-ir IS [},wyXlo.6r lr-Iif 2 .TV ll.�uryl►.-Fr 1W } T35 pvuglm-tr 6'-12" l.3 T" Lkn-KL+ hr Ir-I8" 2 TO llmo�-fw 6"-lr lb T41 [),-4o k e-Ir 13 T42 Txwgwx-6r T48 t'..0l Ar 6"-IY 19 T44 S6'agw ftr 6'lY 19 ar T45 T" Ofi-0wRr 6"-Sr lb T47 Pmdewdi6+.e 1Y-18' 2 ndw 6"-Ir 1.6 T46 Pad& wa Pad& 6"-Ir 13 T40 TSB w0ow and mkiw Ir-Ir 1.8 2 13k"gW:ir 6"-Ir 13 Tree Resource I Practicing Consulting Arborists I www.TreeResource.com Prepared by Zeb Haney 6Page Northmark Building Tree Units c�Qa ,21• j236 Igoo a -1 O � IL? cy, —� cc a o- FA CA � N f' �/ • 1 LN 4 G �fj V A N , b C, � Tree Resource I Practicing Consulting Arborists I www.TreeResource_com Prepared by Zeb Haney 7 1 P a g e Additional assumptions and Limiting Conditions Northm ark Building Tree Units 1. Consultant assumes that any legal description provided to Consultant is correct and that title to property is good and marketable. Consultant assumes no responsibility for legal matters. Consultant assumes all property appraised or evaluated is free and clear, and is under responsible ownership and competent management. 2. Consultant assumes that the property and its use do not violate applicable codes, ordinances, statutes or regulations. 3. Although Consultant has taken care to obtain all information from reliable sources and to verify the data insofar as possible, Consultant does not guarantee and is not responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. 4. Client may not require Consultant to testify or attend court by reason of any report unless mutually satisfactory contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such Services. 5. Unless otherwise required by law, possession of this report does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any person other than the person to whom it is addressed, without the prior express written consent of the Consultant. 6. Unless otherwise required by law, no part of this report shall be conveyed by any person, including the Client, the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media without the Consultants prior express written consent. 7. This report and any values expressed herein represent the opinion of the Consultant, and the Consultant's fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specific value, a stipulated result, the occurrence of a subsequent event or upon any finding to be reported. 8. Sketches, drawings and photographs in this report, being intended as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering or architectural reports or surveys. The reproduction of any information generated by architects, engineers or other consultants and any sketches, drawings or photographs is for the express ptupose of coordination and ease of reference only. Inclusion of such information on any drawings or other documents does not constitute a representation by Consultant as to the sufficiency or accuracy of the information. 9. Unless otherwise agreed, (1) information contained in this report covers only the items examined and reflects the condition of the those items at the time of inspection; and (2) the inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissection, excavation, probing, climbing, or coring. Consultant makes no warranty or guarantee, express or implied that the problems or deficiencies of the plans or property in question may not arise in the future. 10. Loss or alteration of any part of this Agreement invalidates the entire report. Thank you for calling on Tree Resource to review your project. 11 V 4 Zeb ar:ey SC PN-5840B CTRA #859 Tree Resource I Practicing Consulting Arborists I www.TreeResource_con-i Prepared by Zeb Haney 3 l:�ls��4w�s�w �r�_/��f,�.�.��_�.��_�w��sr. �wa� ��■��i� . d.211 . r.:...� �:.� �_■-11111111�11111111�_��1-_�� .._ . -S , q. 31.,F ,i . 91TE--PL 4 ki— -�5, d - 6" A c�! V Q p o �Q va a� it O 490 9 0 Q yO 0 Q °vo 40� 70 / �L�r� o n �Co i Coo av, .5vr Ramp Addition 200 South 333rd Federal way. WA Project/ Revisions No. Date , Item 2 /Notes E3 a 5 l Issue Date A B C Sh$�# NOV 0 4 20 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Job No. Sheet Drawn ITE PLAN Ll n al TE PLAN t�PPRCVAL SI Pemit Number. ® �7 t - OF Avvtove -BT c?re-- 200 South 333rd Federal Way. WA Project/ Revisions /Notes No. L Date Item 1 2 ! 3 4 5 Issue Date A B C Sheet Contents RECEIVED UT 0 5 ;l CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Job No. Sheet Drawn f JCA' k V ,1 J U a I— C.L f� O � CornerStone' The Cornerstone Retaining Wall System is designed for use in either gravity retaining wall structures or mechanically stabilized, geo-grid reinforced soil retaining structures. Applications range from low, lightly loaded gravity designed residential retaining walls to high (30 ft.), commercial and industrial geogrid reinforced structures. Whether the design is simple or complex, CornerStone walls retain their strength, while flexing under seismic loading, or in landscape applications such as curved walls, steps and terraces. The CornerStone 100 and 200 Series are ideal for municipal and commercial retaining structures as well as residential serpentine garden walls. Units are available in a variety of colors and two textures —radius face and flat face, which blend well with buildings and surrounding landscape to enhance the overall appearance of your project. For more information about available colors, please contact a sales representative or visit www.mutualmaterials.com. Custom colors may be restricted by the size of the order or project. These half -height units suit gravity walls up to 3' tall, or it can be used as a creative design detail when building walls with the 100 or 200-Series units. The 50-Series cap units are available with tapered sides for curved walls and straight sides for straight walls. The cap units can be used with 50, 100 and 200-Series unit walls. R-50 Unit R-50 Cap* 4"x18"x12" s 4"x18"x12" 10.2 cm x 45.7 cm x 30.5 cm 10.2 cm x 45.7 cm x 30.5 cm F-50 Unit F-50 Cap: 4"x18"x12" 4"x18"x12" ��- 10.2 cm x 45.7 cm x 30.5 cm - - -{' 10.2 em x 45.7 cm x 30.5 cm Coverage Coverage / Pallet R 50 Unit 2 pc / ftz (21.53 pc / mz) 64 32 ftZ (2.97 mz) 37 lb. (17 kg) 2,418 R 50 Cap 1.51n ft / pc (0.457 In m / pc) 48 72 1n ft (21.95 In m) 60 lb. (27 kg) 2,930 R-50 Cap Straight -sides 1.5 In ft / pc (0.457 In m / pc) 48 72 In ft (21.95 In m) 60 lb. (27 kg) 2,930 F-50 Unit 2 pc / ftZ (21.53 pc / mz) 64 32 ftz (2.97 mz) 38 lb. (17 kg) 2,482 F-50 Cap 1.51n ft / pc (0.457 In m / pc) 48 72 In ft (21.95 In m) 60 lb. (27 kg) 2,930 F-50 Cap Straight -sides 1.5 In ft / pc (0.457 In m / pc) 48 72 In ft (21.95 In m) 60 lb. (27 kg) 2,930 All Weiaht ner Pallet nnted ahnve include a NO lh nallet c iaht_ Q Fr I I R [� lI TTED Maximum gravity wail height. 3. * R-50 Cap and F-50 Cap are available with straight -sides. NOV 0 4 2011 CrTY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY OF t Federal Way October 18, 2011 James Kwon 153 SW 311`h Street Federal Way, WA 98023 FiLE CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: File #11-104051-00-UP; REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Northmark Building Driveway, 200 South 333rd Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Kwon: The Community and Economic Development Department has received your Process I Master Land Use application. You have proposed to construct an 18-foot-wide driveway connection between the two parking areas at an existing office building located at 200 South 333`d Street. The submitted site plan details the need to remove approximately 13 trees, the construction of two parallel retaining walls along the length of the driveway, and permanent removal of two parking stalls. The department is unable to issue approval until the following items are addressed: Reduction of Parking Stalls —The existing and proposed parking stall count does not meet the 69 stall minimum required by Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.235.0101. Although the stall count is nonconforming now, it's likely to have met standards when the building was constructed in 1979. The improvements you have proposed do not trigger the need to meet the current standards, but reduction of the nonconforming stall count cannot be approved at this time. The department recommends the following options if you proceed with the current layout: (1) replace the two stalls at another location on the subject property; or (2) submit a thorough parking study that documents fewer stalls will be adequate to fully serve the office building. 2. Stormwater — The applicant will be required to implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) to mitigate the new impervious surfaces. Stormwater improvements must be designed to meet standards within the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Public Works Department Engineering (EN) approval must be obtained prior to construction. A scaled drawing detailing existing topography and drainage with the proposed improvement must be submitted. Current EN review fees are $271.00 for four hours of review and an inspection charge of $61.00 per hour may be assessed. Please contact Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer, at 253-835-2732 for information regarding stormwater requirements. 3. Trees and Vegetation — Pursuant to FWRC 19.120.130, Office Park (OP), zoned properties are required to maintain a minimum tree canopy density of 20 tree units per acre. Tree units are - - credits -assigned -to- existing trees -that wilt remain-on--the-properly-after- construction. The credits -- range from 1 credit for a tree measuring 1-inch in diameter at breast height (dbh) to 3 credits for a tree measuring 24 inches at dbh. A tree survey prepared by a registered landscape architect or 1 King County records accessed online on October 14, 2011, list the gross floor area (GFA) of the building at 20,626 square feet. Parking ratio requirements are 1 stall for each 300 square feet of GFA resulting in 69 stalls. Mr. Kwon October 18, 2011 Page 2 certified arborist detailing the existing tree canopy and suggested planting (if needed) to meet the minimum 29 tree unitsz is required to be submitted with the engineering documents. Please find the enclosed informational handout regarding the city's tree retention standards. 4. Retaining Walls —Pursuant to FWRC 19.120.120, rockeries and retaining walls are limited to six feet in height and must be composed of rock, brick, or a textured/patterned wall. Please submit proposed wall heights and wall compositions with engineering documents. CLOSING Please use the enclosed form when resubmitting requested items. If you have any questions regarding this letter please contact me at 253-835-2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Matth w Herrera Associate Planner enc: Bulletin 69 `Tree and Vegetation Retention Requirements' Bulletin 129 `Resubmittal Information' c: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer 2 King County records accessed online on October 14, 2011, list the lot as 1.44 acres resulting in a tree unit requirement of 29 credits. 11-104051 Doc I.D 59251 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 11, 2011 TO: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer • Development Services • Traffic? Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Matt Herrera, Associate Planner COMMENTS Your comments via email by Oct 19 would be appreciated. DISCUSSION I typically don't route Process I applications, but there are some issues here. Looks like new impervious surfaces for the new driveway. It's not a new curb cut onto 15t Avenue South like it appears, only a connection to the existing parking lots. Chris — Any fire issues with the proposed 18-wide driveway? Brian — Lakehaven easements we need to be aware oP Ann — We'll likely have stormwater issues due to the new impervious. Not sure if traffic needs to look at it as the improvements are internal, but I've attached an extra site plan just in case. FILE NUMBER(s): RELATED FILE NOS.: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS ZONING DISTRICT.• 11-104051-00-UP None NORTF MARK BUILDING 200 S 333RD ST OP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Propose to create driveway, build concrete wall on side of driveway, remove trees and landscaping LAND USE PERMITS.- Process I PROJECTCONTACT. JAMESKWON 153311THST MATERL4LS SUBMITTED: Site Plan I / ��AS!EmtT%AND LTSE APPLICATION t Y DEI'F Cf]iVIiHIJiYTiY DEVELOPMMM SERVICES CITY OF 33325 8`h Avenue South OCF d !; zol PO Box 9718 Federa I 1111a Federal Way WA 98063-9718 "�"`° " n •::' � 1 r 1= 0 A I `A I A `,1 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com APPLICATION NO(S) It - 104051-00 U P Date f 0 — �� - // roject Name wor V ` L--"I- 0,/ roperty Address/Location _ Parcel Number(s) l7 �b Project Description /L1 lke__ PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director=s Approval) Process H (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial./Residential Required Information dZoning Designation Comprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): occupancy Type Construction Type Applicant Name: O� Yl1 C S k W 64,1 Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signa Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: K_ i R. 00 Address: P_9326 9fel- 41) City/State: T::�t)Cr4.tK_ 4JA 1,J il- Zip= OD3 Phone: Fax: Email: 6>kk k tq_ 'J 0 lQ-keD ,Garrr` Signature: _ Bulletin #003 — August 18, 2004 Page 1 of 1 k:\HandoutsWlaster Land Use Application PROJECT NAME: � � X6 //C� / >�e Add: 200 S 333rd ST Federal way WA 98008 Work description 1. Make a drive way. 2. Build concrete wall for side of drive way. 3. Cut the trees. 4. Landscaping. RECEV ED OOTO 5 %,011 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS