LUTC PKT 06-06-2005
City of Federal Way
City Council
Land Use/Transportation Committee
June 6, 2005
5:30p.m.
City Hall
Council Chambers
MEETING AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 16, 2005
3. PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes)
4. BUSINESS ITEMS
B.
2005 City Wide Pavement Marking ~ Project Bid Award
Action Barker/IS Min
Action Perez/5 Min
Action Perez/l0 Min
Action Perez/20 Min
Action Perez/l0 Min
A.
Noyes Preliminary Plat
C.
Neighborhood Traffic Safety Program Criteria Revision
D.
On-Street Parking of Commercial Vehicles in Residential Zones
E.
Setting a Public Hearing for the 2006-2011 Transportation
Improvement Plan
5. FUTURE MEETINGS/AGENDA ITEMS
6. ADJOURN
Committee Members
Jack Dovey, Chair
Eric Faison
Michael Park
City Staff
Kathy McClung, Community Development Services Director
Marianne Stiles, Administrative Assistant
253-835-2701
G,ILUTCILUTC Ag<ndas and Summaries 2005\06.06.05 LUTC Ag<nda.doc
ClTYOFÂ
Fed 81r alWay
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Jack Dovey, Chair
Land UselTransportation Committee
\lfd
FROM:
Deb Barker, Associate Planner
David ~ager
Noyes Preliminary Plat
Application No. 03-104054-00-SU
VIA:
RE:
DATE:
June 6, 2005
I.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Land Use/Transportation Committee forward to the City Council a
recommendation approving the Noyes preliminary plat with conditions, based on the findings and
conclusions in the May 24, 2005 Report and Recommendation, by the Federal Way Hearing
Examiner.
II. SUMMARY OF ApPLICATION
The applicant requests approval of an eight-lot residential subdivision, as provided for under Federal
Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," subject to City Council approval.
III. REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Pursuant to FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," the City Council issues a final decision at a public
meeting, after review of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation. Consistent with City procedures,
preliminary plat applications are brought to the Land UsefTransportation Committee for review and
recommendation prior to review by the full Council.
IV. HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION
On May 24,2005, the Federal Way Hearing Examiner issued a Report and Recommendation
(Exhibit A) to approve the proposed preliminary plat. The Hearing Examiner's recommendation
includes all conditions recommended by staff. The Examiner's recommendation was issued
following consideration of the following: staff report (Exhibit B); and testimony presented at the
May 10, 2005 public hearing (Exhibit C).
The Hearing Examiner's recommendation is subject to the following conditions of preliminary plat
approval:
1.
2.
3.
Final plat approval shall require full compliance with drainage provisions set forth in the
FWCc. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the
preliminary approved plat.
A.
Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 KCSWDM and amendments
adopted by the City of Federal Way. City of Federal Way approval of the drainage and
roadway plans is required prior to any construction.
B.
The runoff control facilities within the Noyes Plat shall be located within a separate tract
(Tract C) that is landscaped to screen the facility ttom the right~of~way and adjacent
residential uses and to allow for appropriate maintenance of the facility, and shall be
dedicated to the City of Federal Way. Tracts A and B shall be owned, landscaped, and
maintained by the homeowners' association. The homeowners' association shall also
maintain screening vegetation in Tract C. A landscape plan for Tracts A, B, and C shall be
submitted to the City for review and approval as part of the plan.
c.
Prior to approval of engineering plans, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction
of the City that the proposed development shall not impact wetland hydrology.
The final plat drawing shall dedicate Tracts A and B open space tracts to be owned in common
and maintained by property owners of the proposed subdivision, and shall prohibit removal or
disturbance of vegetation and landscaping within the tract, except as necessary for maintenance
or replacement of existing plantings and as approved by the City. No vegetation is to be
removed from Tract A. Additional vegetation may be located in open space Tract B to meet
conditions as approved by the City. A note shall be included on the final plat map that the open
space tracts shall not be further subdivided, may not be developed with any buildings or other
structures except as may be approved by the City for recreational purposes only for the benefit
of the homeowners, and may not be used for financial gain.
Prior to issuance of construction permits, a final landscape plan prepared by a licensed
landscape architect shall be submitted to the City for approval, and shall include the following
elements:
A.
Open space and/or park landscaping in Tract B;
B.
Street trees in right-of-way landscape planter strips;
c.
Tree preservation plan; and
D.
Visual screening of the Tract C storm drainage facilities from the adjacent 11 th Place SW
and from adjacent residential lots with landscaping and fencing. Chain link or cyclone
fencing, if used, shall be coated black or green and shall be screened by vegetation.
Land Use/Transportation Committee
Noyes Preliminary Plat
June 6, 2005
Page 2
10th Place SW extending into 11111 Place SW shall be improved through the project as a minor
collector, including 60-foot wide right-of-way and 36-foot wide pavement width, curb and
gutter, four-foot planter strips, and five-foot wide sidewalks on both sides of the roadway,
streetlights, and street trees,
4.
The design for retaining walls and rockeries, if used on the subject site, shall be harmonious
with existing adjoining residential uses, and shall promote residential design themes through
such means as terracing, orientation, natural material selection, use of vegetation, and textural
treatment.
5.
To minimize the potential or inadvertent wetland setback area intrusions by human activity,
pedestrian related activity within the adjacent open space Tract B should be restricted from the
wetland setback area with rail fencing and signage. Prior to issuance of construction permits,
rail fencing approved by the City shall be depicted around the wetlands buffer subject to
pedestrian activity and appropriate signage and locations identified. The fencing and signage
shall be installed prior to final plat approval and shall be maintained by the homeowners'
association.
6.
7.
Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall dedicate twelve feet ofland for future right-of-
way, adjacent to SW 312111 Street.
Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall analyze future traffic volumes,
provide plans for any necessary traffic calming devices and conduct a neighborhood traffic
safety meeting to present the findings. Traffic calming measures proposed by applicant's
Traffic Engineer and approved by the impacted neighborhoods shall be submitted for review
and approval to the City Public Works Department prior to issuance of construction permits.
8.
9.
Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall install approved traffic calming measures and
any segmented phased steps.
v.
PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
August 29, 2003
Date of application for six-lot Noyes preliminary plat
September 25,2003 Date application determined complete
October 1,2003
October 27,2004
March 9, 2005
May 10, 2005
May 24, 2005
June 6, 2005
Date of Notice of Application
Application revised to eight lots
Environmental determination issued
Hearing Examiner Public Hearing
(Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-126, the Hearing Examiner issues a
recommendation to the City Council.)
Hearing Examiner issued recommendation of conditional approval of
preliminary plat to the City Council.
City Council Land UsefTransportation Committee meeting
(This committee forwards a recommendation to the full Council for a decision
at a public meeting [see Section VII, below].)
Land Use/Transportation Committee
Noyes Preliminary Plat
June 6, 2005
Page 3
VI. DECISIONAL CRITERIA
Pursuant to FWCC Section 20M127, the scope of the City Council review is limited to the record of
the Hearing Examiner public hearing; oral comments received at the public meeting (provided these
do not raise new issues or information not contained in the Examiner's record); and the Examiner's
report. These materials shall be reviewed for compliance with decisional criteria set forth in FWCC
Section 20M 126( c), as noted below:
1.
Consistency with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan;
2.
Consistency with all applicable provisions of the FWCC, including those adopted by
reference from the comprehensive plan;
3.
Consistency with the public health, safety, and welfare;
4.
Consistency with the design criteria listed in Section 20-2; and
5.
Consistency with the development standards listed in Sections 20-151 through 157, and
20-178 through 20-187.
Findings and conclusions that the application is consistent with these decisional criteria are set forth
in the Hearing Examiner's report and recommendation.
VII. COUNCIL ACTION
The Federal Way City Council's review of the application is limited to the record of the hearing
before the Hearing Examiner, oral comments received during the Public Meeting (so long as those
comments do not raise new issues or information contained in the Examiner's record), and the
Examiner's written report. The City Council may receive new information not in the record pursuant
to FWCC Section 20-127(b).
A draft resolution approving the proposed preliminary plat as recommended by the Hearing
Examiner is attached (Exhibit D). After consideration of the record, the City Council may, by action
approved by a majority of the total membership, take one of the following actions, pursuant to
FWCC Section 20-127:
1.
Adopt the recommendation; or
2.
3.
Reject the recommendation; or
Remand the preliminary plat back to the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to FWCC Section
20-127(b); or
4.
Adopt their own recommendations and require or approve a minor modification to the
preliminary plat, pursuant to FWCC Section 20-127(d).
VIII. PROPOSED MOTION
I move that the Land UselTransportation Committee forward to the City Council, and place on the
June 21, 2005 City Council consent agenda, a recommendation approving the Noyes Preliminary
Plat Resolution.
Land Use/Transportation Committee
Noyes Preliminary Plat
June 6, 2005
Page 4
EXIDBITS
A.
B.
C,
D.
Hearing Examiner Report and Recommendation, May 24, 2005
Staff Report to Hearing Examiner
Written testimony presented at the Public Hearing
City Council Draft Resolution for Noyes Preliminary Plat Approval
*NOTE:
A full copy of the Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner. with exhibits, is available in the City
Council Room,
AI>t>ltOVAI. Of' C(>:\1MI'I'1'Io;Io; I{IWORT
.Jack Dovey, Cha.ir
Michael Park, Member
Eric Faison, Member
Land Use/Transportation Committee
Noyes Preliminary Plat
June 6, 2005
Page 5
Page - I
May 24,2005
Paul Noyes
31327 10th Place SW
Federal Way, WA 98003
RE:
NOYES PRELIMINARY PLAT
FWHE#05-07 FW#03-104054-00-5U
Dear Applicant:
Enclosed please find the Report and Decision of the City of Federal Way Hearing
Examiner relating to the above-entitled case.
Very truly yours,
MARK E. HURDELBRINK
DEPUTY HEARING EXAMINER
MEH/ca
cc:
All parties of record
City of Federal Way
EXHIBIT. Is
PAGEi-OF -' 0
Page - 2
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
)
)
)
)
FWHE# 05-07
FW# 03-1 04054-00-SU
NOYES PRELIMINARY PLAT
I. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION
The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval of an eight-lot single-family
residential subdivision as provided for under Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter
20, Subdivisions; and requiring approval pursuant to FWCC Chapter 20, Division 6.
II. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
Hearing Date:
Decision Date:
May 10, 2005
May 24, 2005
At the hearing the following presented testimony and evidence:
1.
2.
Deb Barker, Associate Planner, City of Federal Way
Hans Korve, 726 Auburn Way N., Auburn, WA 98002
At the hearing the following exhibits were admitted as part of the official record of these
proceedings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Staff Report with all attachments
Hard Copy of Power Point Presentation
Letter from Paul Noyes, applicant, dated 3/19/05
Letter from Nigel Tugby (undated)
III. FINDINGS
1.
The Hearing Examiner has heard testimony, admitted documentary evidence into
the record, viewed the site and taken this matter under advisement.
EXHIBIT A
PAGE 2. OF JO
Page - 3
2.
The Community Development Staff Report sets forth general findings, applicable
policies and provisions in this matter and is hereby marked as Exhibit "1" with
attachments and hereby incorporated in its entirety by this reference.
3.
All appropriate notices were delivered in accordance with the requirements of the
Federal Way City Code (FWCC).
4.
An environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued for the
proposed action on March 9, 2005. In accordance with the State Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) and Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18
Environmental Protection, all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of
the site and all affected agencies, were notified of the proposed action and the
City's decision. In addition, the site was posted and notice placed in the
newspaper and on the City's official notice boards. No comments were received
and no changes or corrections were received to the City's initial determination.
No appeals were filed.
5.
The applicant requests preliminary plat approval to subdivide a 4.74 acre parcel
into eight residential single family lots. The minimum lot size will be 7,200 square
feet. There is an already existing single family residence located on site which
will be maintained on a 23,411 square foot lot. The remaining lots will be smaller
in size. The site also contains one drainage tract (Tract C), one conservation and
buffer open space tract (Tract A), and one usable open space tract (Tract B).
The property is located at 31327-10th Place SW adjacent to S. 31ih Street.
6.
The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan designates this to be within the SF-High
Density zone classification. The specific zoning is RS-7.2. The minimum lot size
within this zone is 7,200 square feet. This proposal satisfies the goals of the
Federal Way Comprehensive Plan because the single family development is
located in close proximity to neighborhood business centers. Locating the
development where existing urban infrastructure and services exist will help
preserve and protect Federal Way single family neighborhoods. This is the type
of development that was contemplated in this zone when the comprehensive
plan was adopted.
7.
An access road will be constructed. All lots will access onto the this road. The
road will connect 10th Place SW and 11th Place SW. Sidewalks and street trees
are also proposed. The internal plat sidewalks will connect with already existing
sidewalks along 10th Place SW and 11 th Place SW. It appears that two trees will
have to be removed to accommodate extension of the road. There obviously will
EXHIBIT A
PAGE .-i-OF -'D-
Page - 4
be increased traffic associated with development. Conditions of approval require
that there will be a traffic safety meeting between the applicant and the
neighborhood residents. The applicant's traffic engineer will need to provide
preliminary plans to institute any traffic calming measures.
8,
lakehaven Utility District will provide sewer and water to the site. The applicant
will be required to construct a storm drainage facility that complies with the 1998
King County Surfacewater Design Manual. This will ensure that there will be no
additional stormwater problems created by this development.
9.
As noted above, there is a proposed Tract A, which encompasses a large
wetland and wetland buffer, located on site. Approximately 41 % of the site will be
established in open space.
10.
Prior to recommending preliminary plat approval, FWCC Section 20-126(c)
specifies certain criteria that must be satisfied. Findings on each criteria are
hereby made as follows:
1.
The project is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
As discussed above, this is the exact type of development that was
contemplated when the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan was adopted,
The minimum lot sizes are 7,200 square feet which satisfies the RS-7.2
zone requirements. The plat will also provide a road connection that will
help with connectivity of the road system.
2.
The project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter,
including those adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan.
Conditions of approval require that appropriate measures are taken to
make sure all regulations and codes are satisfied.
3.
The project is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare.
Again, this is the type of development that was contemplated when the
code was adopted. The wetland and associated wetland buffer will be
protected. The proposed road will slightly intrude into the wetland, but this
has been analyzed and will not create any problems.
4.
This proposal is consistent with the design criteria listed in Section 20-2
FWGC.
EXHIBIT Å
PAGE~OF 10
Page - 5
This development will provide connectivity of the roads. It will also provide
for the housing needs of the community.
5.
This proposal is consistent with the development standards listed in
Sections 20-151 through 20-157 and 20-158 through 20-187.
The applicant is required to satisfy all development standards stated in the
above sections.
10.
The applicant ¡salso required to submit a landscape plan that will depict all open
space plantings, detention tract screening, street trees, and tree conservation
techniques. This will ensure that visual and aesthetic effects of the development
will be minimized.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
From the foregoing findings the Hearing Examiner makes the following conclusions:
1.
The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to consider and decide the issues presented
by this request.
2.
The applicant has shown that the preliminary plat is consistent with the goals and
policies of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and that it satisfies the decisional
criteria in FWCC Section 20-126(c). Therefore, the preliminary plat is recommended
for approval subject to the following conditions:
1.
Final plat approval shall require full compliance with drainage provisions
set forth in the FWCC. Compliance may result in reducing the number
and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat.
A.
Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 KCSWDM
and amendments adopted by the City of Federal Way. City of
Federal Way approval of the drainage and roadway plans is
required prior to any construction.
B.
The runoff control facilities within the Noyes Plat shall be located
within a separate tract (Tract C) that is landscaped to screen the
facility from the right-of-way and adjacent residential uses and to
allow for appropriate maintenance of the facility, and shall be
dedicated to the City of Federal Way. Tracts A and B shall be
EXHI~T Á
PAGE OF 10
Page - 6
owned, landscaped, and maintained by the homeowners
association. The homeowners association shall also maintain
screening vegetation in Tract C. A landscape plan for Tracts A, B,
and C shall be submitted to the City for review and approval as part
of the plan.
C.
Prior to approval of engineering plans, the applicant shall
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the site City that the proposed
development shall not impact wetland hydrology.
2.
The final plat drawing shall dedicate Tract A and B open space tracts to
be owned in common and maintained by property owners of the proposed
subdivision, and shall prohibit removal or disturbance of vegetation and
landscaping within the tract, except as necessary for maintenance or
replacement of existing plantings and as approved by the City. No
vegetation is to be removed from Tract A. Additional vegetation may be
located in open space Tract B to meet conditions as approved by the City.
A note shall be included on the final plat map that the open space tracts
shall not be further subdivided, may not be developed with any buildings
or other structures except as may be approved by the City for recreational
purposes only for the benefit of the homeowners, and may not be used for
financial gain.
3.
Prior to issuance of construction permits, a final landscape plan prepared
by a licensed landscape architect shall be submitted to the City for
approval, and shall include the following elements:
A.
Open space and/or park landscaping in Tract B;
B.
Street trees in right-of-way landscape planter strips;
c.
Tree preservation plan; and
4.
Visual screening of the Tract C storm drainage facilities from the
adjacent 11 th Place SW and from adjacent residential lots with
landscaping and fencing. Chain link or cyclone fencing, if used,
shall be coated black or green and shall be screened by
vegetation.
10th Place SW extending into 11 th Place SW shall be improved through
the project as a minor collector, including 60-foot wide right-of-way and
D.
EXHlelT. A
PAGE JL_OF J1L
Page - 7
36-foot wide pavement width, curb and gutter, four-foot planter strips, and
five-foot wide sidewalks on both sides of the roadway, streetlights, and
street trees.
5. The design for retaining walls and rockeries, if used on the subject site,
shall be harmonious with existing adjoining residential uses, and shall
promote residential design themes through such means as terracing,
orientation, natural material selection, use of vegetation, and textural
treatment.
6. To minimize the potential or inadvertent wetland setback area intrusions by
human activity, pedestrian related activity within the adjacent open space
Tract B should be restricted from the wetland setback area with rail fencing
and signage. Prior to issuance of construction permits, rail fencing
approved by the City shall be depicted around the wetlands buffer subject
to pedestrian activity and appropriate signage and locations identified. The
fencing and signage shall be installed prior to final plat approval and shall
be maintained by the homeowners association.
7. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall dedicate twelve feet of land
for future right-of-way, adjacent to SW 31 ih Street.
8,
Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall analyze future
traffic volumes, provide plans for any necessary traffic calming devices and
conduct a neighborhood traffic safety meeting to present the findings.
Traffic calming measures proposed by applicant's Traffic Engineer and
approved by the impacted neighborhoods shall be submitted for review
and approval to the City Public Works Department prior to issuance of
construction permits.
9. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall install approved traffic
calming measures and any segmented phased steps,
RECOMMENDATION:
It is hereby recommended to the City of Federal Way City Council that the preliminary plat
EXHIBIT A
PAGE ~OF J!L
Page - 8
of Noyes be approved subject to the conditions contained in the conclusions above.
DATED THIS 24th DAY OF May, 2005.
MARK E. HURDELBRINK
Deputy Hearing Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS 24th DAY OF May, 2005, to the following:
APPLICANT: Paul Noyes
31327 10th Place SW
Federal Way, WA 98003
ENGINEER:
DMP Engineers, Inc.
Mel Daily
726 Auburn Way North
Auburn, WA 98002
OWNER:
Paul Noyes
31327 10th Place SW
Federal Way, WA 98003
OTHERS:
Hans Korve
726 Auburn Way North
Auburn, W A 98002
Luke & Ivone Langford
31200 10th Place SW
Federal Way, WA 98023
Laura L. Lansciardi-Codde
29928 21st Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
EXHIBIT A
PAGELOF ßL
Page - 9
Sandra K. lansciardi
31212 - 10th Place SW
Federal Way, WA 98023
J.R. Hershey
1208 SW 31 ih Street
Federal Way, WA 98023
Helga Stahl
31233 10th Ct. SW
Federal Way, WA 98023
Melvin A. Mattson and Carol J. Mattson
31206 10th Place SW
Federal Way, WA 98023
Barbara and Emil Sabbatini
31245 - 10th Court SW
Federal Way, WA 98023
Nigel Tugby
18415-44th Avenue S.
SeaTac, WA 98188
City of Federal Way
c/o Chris Green
P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
EXHIBIT A
PAGE ~OF LR-
Page - 10
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW, ACTION
Pursuant to Section 20-127, following receipt of the final report and recommendation of the
hearing examiner, a date shall be set for a public meeting before the city council.
The city council review of the preliminary plat application shall be limited to the record of the
hearing before the hearing examiner, oral comments received during the public meeting (so long
as those comments do not raise new issues or information not contained in the examiner's
record) and the hearing examiner's written report, These materials shall be reviewed for
compliance with decisional criteria set forth in section 20-126, The city council may receive new
evidence or information not contained in the record of hearing before the hearing examiner, but
only if that evidence or information: (i) relates to the validity of the hearing examiner's decision at
the time it was made and the party offering the new evidence did not know and was under no
duty to discover or could not reasonably have discovered the evidence until after the hearing
examiner's decision; or (ii) the hearing examiner improperly excluded or omitted the evidence
from the record. If the city council concludes, based on a challenge to the hearing examiner
recommendation or its own review of the recommendation, that the record compiled by the
hearing examiner is incomplete or not adequate to allow the city council to make a decision on
the application, the city council may by motion remand the matter to the hearing examiner with
the direction to reopen the hearing and provide supplementary findings and/or conclusions on
the matter or matters specified in the motion.
After considering the recommendation of the hearing examiner, the city council may adopt or
reject the hearing examiner's recommendations based on the record established at the public
hearing. If, after considering the matter at a public meeting, the city council deems a change in
the hearing examiner's recommendation approving or disapproving the preliminary plat is
necessary, the city council shall adopt its own recommendations and approve or disapprove the
preliminary plat.
As part of the final review, the city council may require or approve a minor modification to the
preliminary plat if:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
The change will not have the effect of increasing the residential density of the plat;
The change will not result in the relocation of any access point to an exterior street from
the plat;
The change will not result in any loss of open space or buffering provided in the plat; and
The city determines that the change will not increase any adverse impacts or undesirable
effects of the project and that the change does not significantly alter the project.
EXHIBIT A
PAGE~OF -!L
~
C::'ITYOF ~~,~~
Federal Way
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT TO THE FEDERAL WAY HEARING EXAMINER
NOYES PRELIMINARY PLAT
Federal Way File No. 03-1040S4-00-SU
PUBLIC HEARING - May 10, 2005
Federal Way City Hall City Council Chambers
33325 8th Avenue South
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. General Information .......................................h..'.......,............""""""'" ..........,......... ...........2
II. Consulted Departments and Agencies""""""""""""""""hh""""""""""""""""".............3
III. State Environmental Policy Act..........................................................,.................................3
IV. Natural Environment..,...........................................................................................,... ...........3
V. Neighborhood Characteristics........................ h. h. hh h. ..h.m..h.' h""""" .................. ........... ...6
VI. General Design.... ......... ............................. h..hh.......h.h.. h ...... h"'" .............. ..... .................. ...6
VII. Transportation .........,... ..........,.............................................................. h....... h............ h'....... 7
VIII. Public Services..... """"""""""""""""" h................. h..... h........"""""""""""", ..................8
IX. Utilities............ ...... ...........................................................h h.............................. .....,............. 9
X. Analysis of Decisional Criteria. ........ ...........h.h...........h...............................................,...,.l 0
XI. Findings of Fact and Conclusion..m....................m...............................................hh........h12
XII. Recommendations............................. ...............................................................h............... ..13
XIII. List of Exhibits.......................................... .m....m..m.......... ............................................. ...15
Report Prepared by:
Deb Barker, Associate Planner
April 29, 2005
EXHIBIT .J3
PAGE I OF J!L
File No:
Applicant:
Engineer:
Owner:
Action
Requested:
Staff
Representative:
Staff
Recommendation:
03-104054-00-8U
Paul Noyes
31327 10th Place SW
Federal Way, WA 98003
Phone: 253-946-4867
DMP Engineers, Inc.
Mel Daily
726 Auburn Way North
Auburn, W A 98002
Phone: 253-333-2000
Paul Noyes
31327 10th Place SW
Federal Way, W A 98003
Preliminary plat approval of an eight-lot single-family residential subdivision as
provided for under Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, Subdivisions; and
requiring approval pursuant to FWCC Chapter 20, Division 6.
Deb Barker, Associate Planner, 253-835-2642
Preliminary Plat Approval with Conditions as Recommended
A.
GENERAL INFORMA nON
I
Description of the Proposal- The applicant proposes to subdivide a 4.74-acre lot into eight
residential single-family lots, each having a minimum of 7,200 square feet (Exhibit A). One
drainage tract, one conservation and buffer open space tract, and one usable open space tract are
also proposed with the application.
Location - The property is located at 31327 10th Place 8W adjacent to South 312th Street at 10th
Place as extended (Exhibit B - Vicinity Map).
B.
C.
D,
Legal Description - See Exhibit C .- Legal Description.
Size of Property- The subject site has a land area of 206,474 acres (4.74 square feet).
E.
Land Use and Zoning -
Direction
Site
North
South
East
West
Zoning
RS-7.21
RS- 7.2
RS- 7.2
R8- 7.2
R8-7.2
Comprehensive Plan
SF - High Density
Same
Same
Same
SF - High Density
Existing Land Use
Existing SFR2
SW 312th Street, SFR
8FR
Planned Unit Development
SFR
IRS-7.2 '" Single-Family Residential, 7,200 SF minimum lot size.
2 SFR '" Single-Family Residential
Noyes Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner's Report
FiI~f~;~ '~? ~
II
F.
Background ~ The Noyes preliminary plat application was submitted on August 29, 2003, as a
six-lot subdivision, with one drainage tract and two open space tracts. The application was
determined complete on September 25,2003. On October 27,2004, the applicant revised the
subdivision to eight lots following technical comments. Environmental Review was conducted
on the eight lots.
CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
The following departments, agencies, and individuals were advised of this application.
A.
Community Development Review Committee (CORe), consisting of the Federal Way
Community Development Services Planning and Building Divisions; Public Works
Engineering and Traffic Divisions; Parks Recreation and Cultural Resources Department;
Federal Way Department of Public Safety (Police); Federal Way Fire Department; Lakehaven
Utility District; and Federal Way Public Schools. CDRC comments have been incorporated into
this report where applicable.
B.
All property owners within 300 feet of the site were mailed notices of the complete application
on October 1,2003 (Exhibit D, Notice of Application, Exhibit E, Mailing List). The City
received seven comment letters in response to the issued notice of application. Copies of these
letters with City responses are found in Exhibit F -Citizen Comments. The City responded in
writing to all parties that provided written comments on the notice of application (Exhibit G ..-
City Re~ponse). The public was also notified of the May 10, 2005 public hearing. The site was
also posted and notice(s) published in the newspaper and on the City's official notice boards.
c.
In accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) and FWCC Chapter 18,
Environmental Protection, all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the site, and all
affected agencies (Exhibit f{ - SEP A Mailing List), were notified of the proposed action and the
City's environmental decision. In addition, the site was posted and notice placed in the
newspaper and on the City's official notice boards. No comments were received, and no
changes or corrections were made to the City's initial determination.
III STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
A.
An Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued for the proposed action
on March 9,2005 (Exhibit I - DNS). This determination was based on review of information in
the project file, including the environmental checklist (Exhibit J - Staff Evaluation), resulting in
the conclusion that the proposal would not result in probable significant adverse impacts on the
environment.
B.
One comment letter from the applicant was received during the 14-day SEPA comment period
(Exhibit K ..- SEP A Comment Letter) - No appeals were filed.
IV NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
A.
Storm Water Runoff-The applicant will be required to provide storm drainage improvements
to comply with all applicable Core and Special Requirements outlined in the 1998 King..County
Noyes Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner's Report
File No. 03-104054/ Do,,!.D. 31241
Page 3
EXHIB.IT B
PAGE 3 OF. -d-
Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), including surface water quantity and quality .
control. DMP Engineers, Inc. prepared and submitted a Level I Off-Site Analysis dated July 28,
2003 (Exhibit L - Level I), and a (Preliminary) Modified Technical Information Report, dated
October 13,2003 (Exhibit M - TIR), to the Department of Community Development Services
for review by the Public Works Department. The preliminary plat depicts stormwater collected
in a detention pond at the southwest comer of the site, with release into the existing City storm
drainage system. See Section IX. C. of this report for a detailed description of the proposed
drainage facilities.
B.
Soils - The 1973 King County soils survey map lists the soils type as Alderwood Gravelly
Sandy Loam (AgB) and Seattle Muck (Sk). AgB soils are characterized as moderately well
drained soils over dense, relatively impermeable till at depths of 24 to 40 inches. These soils are
described as capable of adequate compaction, runoff is slow, and erosion hazard is slight with
slopes at 0-6 percent. Seattle Muck soils are made up of poorly drained organic soils,
permeability is moderate, and there is seasonal high water table at or near the surface.
c.
Topography - The site is flat, with a gentle slope of three percent. The site slopes gradually
from the center to the northeast and to the southwest.
D.
Vegetation - The northern half of the property is deciduous forest with dense scrub/shrub under
story. A wetland is located in the northeast portion of the property. A small knoll present at the
southerly portion of the site contains sparse big/leaf maple, blackberry, and grasses.
Omamentallandscaping surrounds the existing residence. According to the Observed Plant List
prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates (Exhibit N - Plant List), vegetation in the non-wetland or
upland areas includes Quaking Aspen, Douglas fir, western red cedar, black cottonwood, big
leaf maple and red alder, with an under story of salmonberry and red elderberry, hardhack, wild
rose, and Scot's broom. Herbaceous species are also present.
The applicant's Significant TreelRecreation plan prepared by DMP, Inc, revised date October
25, 2004 (Exhibit A - Significant Tree/Recreation Plan), identified 35 trees on the site meeting
the FWCC definition of "significant." The plan locates two of these trees in the future right-of-
way and utility easements; those trees are proposed to be removed. Other trees located in the
future right-of-way are not significant. Meandering of the road around significant trees was not
feasible due to small site and existing points of connection, according to the applicant and
verified by staff. Approximately six percent of the significant trees are proposed for removal
(Exhibit A, Preliminary Clearing and Grading Plan). Approval ofthe preliminary plat is
subject to submittal and approval of a landscape plan pursuant to FWCC Section 20-158.
Retained significant trees outside of the right-of-way and drainage tract will be regulated under
FWCC Section 22-1568, Significant Trees, and reviewed with each residential building permit.
The preliminary clearing and grading plan depicts clearing limits that meet City standards for
development clearing noted above.
E.
Wetland - The preliminary plat site contains a wetland in the northern portion ofthe site. The
wetland continues off site into Tract B of the plat of Hidden Lane. Approximately two thirds of
wetland #072104-23 is located on the subject site. A Wetland Assessment dated June 13, 2001,
prepared by Jones and Associates, was submitted with the formal application (Exhibit 0-
Wetland Assessment). This report found that the wetland is Palustrine shrub/scrub and forested
wetland. All three wetland criteria were determined to be present: the wetland is seasonally
inundated; the dominant plant species include obligates and facilitative wet indicator species,
and the soil is histosol, Seattle muck. The overall wetland is 47,000 square feet in size, and
File No. 03-104054/ Doc W 31241
Noyes Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner's Report
EXHIBIT ~
PAGE II OF JL.
meets the City definition of a Category II wetland, as it is larger than one acre. Category II
wetlands are regulated under the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) with 1O0-foot buffers.
The applicant submitted a Functional Assessment of Wetlands on the Noyes Property prepared
by JS Jones and Associates dated July 10, 2004 (Exhibit P - Functional Assessment). This
report concludes that the wetland has the ability and opportunity to provide a high degree of
removal of sediments, nutrients, metals and organics, to reduce peak flows and decrease
downstream erosion. The wetland has a moderate ability and high opportunity to recharge
ground water and a moderate ability and opportunity to provide general habitat. There is low
ability and opportunity to provide habitat for amphibians, birds, resident fish, mammals, and
anadromous fish. With development outside of the regulated buffers, most wetland functions
will be undiminished.
In a Hydrologic Impact Assessment of the Noyes Preliminary Plat dated October 15,2004
prepared by JS Jones and Associates (Exhibit Q -Hydrologic Assessment), the wetland
consultant analyzed information from the civil engineer and concluded that there will be no
measurable affect on wetland hydrology and that changes to the wetland hydroperiod, water
levels and the duration of soil saturation will be too small to measure and will not result in any
change to the wetland plant community. The City concurs with this proposal as adequately
addressing wetland hydrology, subject to a detailed analysis during engineering plans review.
Neighbor comment letters also noted long-term efforts to clean up the wetland and successful
restoration of wetland habitat and functions.
The applicant proposes to establish the wetland and associated 100-foot buffer in Tract A,
approximately 70,622 square feet in size as conservation open space. This would be next to
proposed Tract B, which would be established as usable open space. Both tracts would be
dedicated to the Homeowners Association for ownership and maintenance. (See Section V.B
for Open Space discussion.)
The applicant also proposes a 48 square-foot intrusion into the southern portion ofthe wetland
buffer for the widening of 10th A venue South; no other intrusions are proposed. Intrusions into
a wetland setback area for installation of essential public facilities, including streets and public
utilities, are administratively permitted pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1359(b). This small area
does not provide significant habitat area for the overall wetland, which is located north of the
intrusion. The portions of wetland setback area disturbed with the right-of-way installation will
be re-vegetated with appropriate trees and shrubs. However, pedestrian related activity within
the open space area adjacent to the wetland setback area must be controlled. Open rail fencing
and signage to minimize potential or inadvertent wetland setback area intrusions by human
activity should be provided.
F.
Wildlife ~ The SEP A checklist noted that songbirds and rodents have been observed at the site.
Neighbors near the property reported observing birds, frogs, and ducks at the site. One neighbor
said they had worked to provide habitat for herons, foxes, raccoons, and coyotes.3 The Wetland
Assessment prepared by Jones and Associates states that wildlife habitat functions for the
wetland area is moderate with fair connectivity to forested uplands and grasslands. The
development ofthe non-wetland and wetland buffer areas wîll reduce uplands wildlife habitat
areas. However, the preservation of the 40,000 square-foot wetland and associated wetland
buffer wîll continue to provide undisturbed habitat areas for wildlife. As noted above, open rail
3 Matson letter, undated
Noyes Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner's Report
File No, 03-104054/ DodD m41
PageS
EXHIBIT ~
PAGE S" OF-11-
v
fencing and signage between the open space pedestrian trail and the wetland buffer will reduce
intrusions by human activity. No additional measures to preserve or enhance wildlife are
proposed.
NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS
A.
Vicinity - The property is situated in the central portion of the City, in a developed single-
family residential area. The site contains a 3,670 square-foot single-family residence with 1,350
square-foot attached garage that would be retained with plat development. Adjacent properties
contain single-family residences on lots averaging 10,582 square feet to the west (Lakota
Woods); 7,220 to the south (plat of Mirror Wood), and 3,000 square feet to the east (Planned
Unit Development of Hidden Lane).
B.
South 312M Street - SW 312th Street extends along the northern border of the subject site. The
70,662 square-foot regulated wetland and associated wetland buffer is situated between the SW
312th Street and the developable portions of the lot. This wetland and associated buffer provide
substantial vegetative buffer between the subject site and the arterial street.
VI GENERAL DESIGN
A.
Lot Layout - Lots generally rectangular in shape fan out from proposed 10th Place SW. The lots
range in size from 7,300 square feet to 23,411 square feet. There are five lots proposed on the
east side of 10th Place SW. Three lots, including one with the existing residential structure, the
two open space tracts and the storm drainage tract are proposed on the west side of 10th Place
SW. The usable open space tract is long and narrow, following the form of the wetland buffer
without intrusion. The proposed 23,411 square-foot lot with the existing residence on it is "L"
shaped. Should any rockeries or retaining walls be installed within the subdivision, their design
should promote residential design themes through terracing, natural material selection,
placement of vegetation, and textural treatment.
B.
Open Space - The applicant depicts Tract B, 14,710 square feet in size, as usable open space.
Tract B is to contain a five-foot wide gravel trail, two picnic tables, and under story plantings.
There are two open space tracts proposed for open space. Tract A is depicted as buffer and
conservation open space, and no improvements are proposed. Refer to Section VIII.B. below
for additional open space discussion.
c.
Subdivision Access and Roadway System - Access to the property will be provided by the
eastern extension of 10th Place SW connecting to 11th Place SW. This is classified by the
Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) as a minor collector street, providing 60 feet of
right-of-way. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1528, Local streets ri¡ht-oj-way, and Cross
Section'S' of the FWCP, the minimum right-of-way width for 10 Place SW is 60 feet. The
applicant is proposing full street improvements for the roadway, including 36 feet of pavement,
vertical curb/gutters, street trees, sidewalks, street lights, and landscape/utility strips within the
60-foot right-of-way (Exhibit A - Site Plan Cross Section). The applicant submitted a
modification request to defer right-of-way improvements on SW 3121h Street on March 26,
2003. This modification was conditionally granted on April 24, 2003. The applicant has
proposed to dedicate twelve feet ofland at the north side of the site for future right-of~way.
This dedication shall be made through statutory warranty deed prior to final plat approval.
File No. 03-104054 I Doc, W 31241
Page 6
Noyes Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner's Report
EXHlalT 13
PAGIIE (ø ~
Public Works Department and Federal Way Fire Department have reviewed and approved the
proposed access, street improvements, and curve radius.
D. Pedestrian System - Sidewalks will be provided along 10th Place SW connecting to existing
sidewalks on 10th Place SW and 11 th Place SW. Pedestrian systems on SW 3 12th Street consist
of widened shoulder with a three-inch tall raised curb spaced intermittently along the right-of-
way.4 Installation of the Noyes subdivision will connect previously unconnected
neighborhoods.
E.
Clearing and Grading - FWCC Section 20-178 identifies that all natural vegetation shall be
retained on the site to be subdivided, except that which will be removed for improvements or
grading as shown on approved engineering plans. The applicant proposed limited clearing
within the right-of-way prism and within the storm drainage tract area to provide plat
infrastructure. The preliminary clearing and grading plan depicts clearing limits that meet City
standards for development clearing noted above.
F.
Landvcape Buffers - In accordance with FWCC Chapter 20, Subdivisions, landscape buffers are
specified when the plat is adjacent to an arterial street. SW 312th Street, which lies north of the
subject site, is considered an arterial street. Existing vegetation associated with the wetland
meets and exceeds the landscape buffer requirement (Exhibit A, Significant Tree/Recreation
Plan). The wetland and associated buffer will be in a separate tract to be dedicated and
maintained by the homeowners association, consistent with the FWCc. Street tree requirements
are described in VII. A., and detention tract screening in IX. c., below.
Visual screening of Tract C from 11 th Place SW shall be provided with landscaping and/or
fencing. Cyclone fencing, ifused, shall be coated black or green and shall be screened by
vegetation. Vegetation associated with storm drainage tract screening shall be maintained by
the homeowners association.
VII TRANSPORT AnON
A.
Street Improvements ~ In accordance with the FWCC, all required street improvements must be
dedicated as City right-of-way and improved to City street standards. Specifically, street
improvements for 10th Place SW will include: 36 feet of pavement, vertical curbs, gutters,
sidewalks, and street trees, within a 60-foot right-of-way width. Nineteen Maple street trees are
proposed to be installed along 10th Place SW (Exhibit A - Significant Tree/Retention Plan).
Street tree requirements are waived for SW 312th Street. The applicant will dedicate to the City
twelve feet ofland along the north side ofthe property for future right-of-way.
Street lighting is required pursuant to FWCC Section 22'-1522. The applicant has proposed to
install three streetlights in the subdivision.
B.
Adequacy of Arterial Roads - This proposal has been reviewed under the State Environmental
Policy Act (SEP A). Based on the FWCC, the additional traffic to be generated by this
development does not require any roadway improvements or pro rata share payments because
there are no projects in the City's Tram,-portation Improvement Plan (TIP) impacted by the
project.
4 A future City roadway widening pwject on SW 31 zth Street will provide sidewalks, curbing, etc.
Noyes Preliminary Plat File No. 03~104054 / Doc. ID 3124]
Hearing Examiner's Report Page 7
EXHIBIT~
PAGE2-0F ..!t-
Traffiç Calming - The proposed subdivision will create new planned roadway connections
between two existing unconnected neighborhoods. To address City of Federal Way
comprehensive plan policies, the applicant's Traffic Engineer shall analyze future traffic
volumes, and provide preliminary plans for any needed traffic calming measures. Prior to
issuance of construction permits, these measures shall be presented to the impacted
neighborhoods in a Traffic Safety meeting conducted by the applicant and consistent with
current City policy and procedures. Prior to issuance of construction permits, traffic calming
measures proposed by the applicant's Traffic Engineer and approved by impacted
neighborhoods shall be submitted for review and approval to the City of Federal Way Public
Works Department. Installation of the improvements and all segmented phased steps of the
traffic calming measures shall occur prior to final plat approval.
VIII PUBLIC SERVICES
A.
&hools - As part ofthe City's review of the proposal, the preliminary plat application was
referred to the Federal Way School District for comments. Lake Grove, Lakota Middle School,
and Federal Way High School will serve the proposed subdivision. The Noyes School Walking
Report prepared by DMP, Inc dated October 23,2003 (Exhibit R - School Report), states that
Lake Grove Elementary School is located more than a mile from the site and students will be
bussed to the school. The bus stop for elementary school students is located in the Mirror Wood
subdivision located south ofthe subject site. Sidewalks extended from the Noyes subdivision
will connect to existing Mirror Woods sidewalks. The Middle School is approximately '4 mile
from the site and students will walk to this school through the Hidden Lane subdivision, and
onto a widened shoulder along the south side of SW 31 i" Street. The High School is also
located more than one mile of the subject site, and students will be bussed tTom the intersection
of 8th A venue SW and SW 316th Street. School service areas are reviewed annually and may be
adjusted to accommodate enrollment growth and new development.
School impact fees, as authorized by City ordinance and collected at the time of building permit
issuance, are currently $2,868.00 per single-family housing unit.5 School impact fees are
determined on the basis of the School District's Capital Facilities Plan and are subject to
annual adjustment and update.
B.
Open Space - Lakota Park, a community park, is located Y2 mile from the subject site. French
Lake Park and Lake Grove Park, both Neighborhood Parks are also located Y'2 mile from the
site. The subject site is in park planning area A, which currently has a shortfall of seven acres
based on 2002 population.
To provide adequate recreational opportunities commensurate with new residential
development, FWCC Chapter 20, Subdivisions, requires dedication ofland on site for open
space, or a fee-in-lieu-ofpayment. Specifically, FWCC Section 20-155(b) requires all
residential subdivisions to provide open space in the amount of 15 percent of the gross land
area of the subdivision site; or pay a fee in lieu of payment for all or portions of the open space
area required.
Total open space required for this plat is 30,905 square feet (15 percent of the 206,038 square-
foot parcel). Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-155, the applicant proposes to establish a 14,710
square-foot usable open space tract with a 220-foot long pedestrian trail, two picnic tables, and
5 A $143.50 administrative fee is also assessed-
Noyes Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner's Report
File No. 03-104054/ IJoc.1.D. 31241
Page 8
EXHIBIT ~
P AGE --L- 0F1!::
landscaping. The balance of the open space obligation would be met due to the 27,901 square
feet of conservation open space and 42,721 square feet of buffer open space associated with the
regulated wetland and wetland buffer located in proposed Tract A. The open space and wetland
and wetland buffer tracts would be owned in common by and dedicated to the Homeowners
Association. Approximately 41 % of the site would be established in open space.
The Parks and Recreation Director, in a September 11,2003 analysis, determined that the
proposed plat will have minimal impact to the CUITent inventory of parks in Planning Area A,
and recommended approval of the on-site open space proposal (Exhibit S - Park Analysis).
Tract A shall not be dedicated to the City.
c.
Fire Protection - The Fire Department requires that a fire hydrant be located within 350 feet of
each lot. The preliminary plat drawing depicts an existing hydrant on 10th Place SW right-of-
way. The exact location of the new hydrant must be approved by the Fire Department.
IX UTILITIES
A.
Sewage Dispasal- The applicant proposes to serve the proposed plat by a public sewer system
managed by Lakehaven Utility District. A June 2, 2003, Certificate afSewer Availability
(Exhibit T - Certificate) indicates the district's capacity to serve the proposed development
through a DL:.veloper Extension Agreement (DEA) between the applicant and the district.
B.
Water Supply - The applicant proposes to serve the subdivision with a public water supply and
distribution system managed by the Lakehaven Utility District. The June 2, 2003, Leiter of
Water Charges (Exhibit U - Water Certificate) indicates Lakehaven's capacity to serve the
proposed development through a Developer Extension Agreement (DEA).
c.
Drainage Facilities - The site is divided into two separate discharge areas with roughly one
third of the site discharging to the north towards the on-site wetland and the remaining areas
discharging to the south. Development of the site will create additional nmoff from new
impervious surfaces such as streets, driveways, and rooftops. Storm drainage facilities are being
designed in accordance with the 1998 King County SUlface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM)
and the City's amendments to the manual. A Level I Off-Site Analysis dated July 29, 2003
(Exhibit K - Level 1), and a Preliminary Modified Technical Information Report (TIR) dated
October 13, 2004 (Exhibit M - TIR), prepared by DMP, Inc. were submitted and reviewed by
the City's Public Works Department who concurred with information in the reports. The
applicant also submitted a preliminary clearing and grading plan dated October 14,2004,
prepared by DMP, Inc. depicting proposed storm drainage improvements.
Because ofthe wetland and associated buffer, there will be limited amount of development that
is allowed to occur within the northern discharge area. As the amount of new impervious
surfaces added to the northern discharge area is less than 5,000 square feet, this area is exempt
from the requirements. Flow control and Water Quality facilities will not be required for the
northern discharge area.
The proposed storm drainage facility for the southerly discharge area uses Level One Flow
Control criteria pursuant to the 1998 KCSWDM to provide on-site flow control; while water
quality is designed using resource stream protection menu. The preliminary modified TIR
proposes a two-cell combination Detention and Stormwater Wetland/Wetpond to meet both
Noyes Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner's Report
File No. 03-104054/ Doc, w. 31241
Page 9
EXHIBIT ~
PAGE~()F7r
water quantity and quality control requirements. The new facility will discharge to the natural
downstream location near the SW comer of the property. An existing fifteen-inch corrugated
metal pipe has been stubbed to the project site in anticipation of future development and
connection.
In a Wetland Hydrologic Impact Assessment, prepared by J.S. Jones and Associates (Exhibit Q
- Hydrologic Assessment) the wetland consultant analyzed information from the civil engineer
and concluded that there will be no measurable affect on wetland hydrology and that changes to
the wetland hydroperiod, water levels, and the duration of soil saturation will be too small to
measure and will not result in any change to the wetland plant community. The City concurs
with this proposal as adequately addressing wetland hydrology, subject to a detailed analysis
during engineering plans review. Prior to issuance of construction permits, engineering plans
and corresponding technical data shall demonstrate that wetland hydrology is not impacted by
the proposed subdivision development.
Final review and approval of the storm drainage facilities as shown on the engineering plan will
occur in conjunction with full drainage review. Stormwater design and plat drainage elements
must conform to the standards, policies, and practices of the City of Federal Way's Surface
Water Management Division as outlined in the adopted King County Surface Water Design
Manual, and City amendments to the Manual, the Comprehensive Surface Water Management
Plan, and the Storm water System Operation and Maintenance Manual. The approved storm
drainage facilities must be constructed per City code requirements, prior to final plat approval
and recording of the subdivision. The detention facilities shall be vegetatively screened from
the plat, the right-of-way, and surrounding properties. Cyclone fencing, if used, shall be black
or dark green vinyl coated.
x
ANALYSIS OF DECISIONAL CRITERIA
The FWCC establishes review procedures and decisional criteria for deciding upon various types of
land use applications. Pursuant to FWCC Chapter 20, Subdivisions, Section 20-110, preliminary plat
applications are submitted to the Hearing Examiner for public hearing. The preliminary plat
application and the recommendation ofthe Hearing Examiner are submitted to the City Council for
approval or disapproval.
A. Hearing Examiner Preliminary Plat Decisional Criteria - Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-126(c),
the Hearing Examiner may recommend approval of the proposed preliminary plat only if the
following decisional criteria are met. Decisional criteria and staff responses are provided below.
1.
The project is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Staff Comment: The application is subject to the adopted 2003 Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), which designates the property as Single-Family High-
Density. The proposed land use, Single-Family Residential, with 7,200 square-foot
minimum lot size (RS-7.2), is consistent with density allowances and policies applicable
to this land use as established in the FWCP.
The Public Works Traffic Division has indicated that the following City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plans policies apply to the proposal:
Noyes Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner's Report
File No. 03-104054 / Doc. I.D. 31241
Page 10
EXHIBIT a
PAGE 10 OF J!L
TP5: Protect neighborhoods from traffic impacts; TP20: Take advantage of opportunities
to open new road connections to create route alternatives, especially in areas with few
access choices; TP2I: Enhance traffic circulation and access with closer spacing of
through streets; unless geographical constraints do not permit. Limit the area to be served
by a single access point commensurate with planned density; TP23: Minimize through
traffic on residential streets by maximizing through travel opportunities on arterial and
collector streets; and TP26: Employ traffic calming measures in neighborhoods (where
feasible) where traffic volumes and speeds on local streets consistently exceed reasonable
levels.
2.
The project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those
adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan.
Staff Comment: The preliminary plat application is required to comply with the
provisions of the FWCC, Chapter 18, Environmental Policy; Chapter 20, Subdivisions;
Chapter 22, Zoning; and all other applicable codes and regulations. Future development of
the residential subdivision will be required to comply with all applicable development
codes and regulations. As proposed, and with conditions as recommended by staff, the
preliminary plat will comply with all provisions of the chapter.
3.
The project is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare.
Staff Comment: The proposed preliminary plat would permit development of the site
consistent with the current Single-Family High-Density land use classification of the
City's FWCP and map. Proposed access and fire hydrant locations must meet all
requirements of the Federal Way Fire Department. Future development of the plat in
accordance with applicable codes and regulations will ensure protection of the public
health, safety, and welfare.
4.
It is consistent with the design criteria listed in Section 20-2.
Staff Comment: The proposed preliminary plat would promote the purposes identified in
FWCC Section 20-2, and the standards and regulations therein, as identified in the staff
report, including effective use ofland, promotion of safe and convenient travel on streets,
provision for the housing needs of the community, and protection of environmentally
sensitive areas. As proposed, and with conditions as recommended by City staff, the
preliminary plat application complies with all provisions of the chapter.
5.
It is consistent with the development standards listed in Sections 20-151 through 157, and
20-158 through 187. .
Staff Comment: Development of this site is required to comply with the provisions of
FWCC Chapter 20, Subdivisions; Chapter 18, Environmental Protection; Chapter 22,
Zoning; and all other applicable local and state development codes and regulations. As
proposed, and as recommended by City staff, the preliminary plat application complies
with all applicable statutes, codes, and regulations.
Noyes Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner's Report
File No. 03-104054 / Doc I.D. 31241
Page II
EXHIBIT'~
PAGE~J.!L
XI FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
Based on an analysis of the proposed action, the environmental record, and related decisional
criteria, the Department of Community Development Services finds that:
1.
The proposed action is to subdivide a vacant 4.73-acre parcel into eight single-family lots, with
one storm drainage tract, and two open space tracts. There is an existing single-family residence
on the site that will be retained within the subdivision. There are existing single-family
residential land uses to the east, west, and south. The northern portion of the site contains a
regulated Category II wetland.
2.
Zoning for the site and adjacent parcels is RS 7.2, The proposed residential subdivision and
density is consistent with existing adjacent land uses and zoning.
3.
An Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued for this proposed
action on March 9,2005. No appeals were received and the decision was finalized with no
modification. This determination is incorporated by reference as though set forth in full.
4.
The site contains a 47,111 square-foot wetland regulated under the FWCC as a Category II
wetland with 10O-foot buffer. A 48 square~foot intrusion into the southern portion of the
wetland buffer to accommodate roadway widening has been administratively approved
pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1359(b).
5.
The applicant is proposing a combined Water Quality and Flow Control facility located within
a separate tract, at the southwest comer of the plat designed in accordance with Levell flow
control standard and Resource Stream Water Quality protection ofthe 1998 King County
Suiface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). This stonnwater facility wí1l provide the required
levels of water quality and detention for the majority of all new impervious areas created as part
of this development.
6.
Public access into the subdivision will be provided by the extension of 10th Place SW to 11 dl
Place SW. The applicant will dedicate twelve feet of land for future right-of-way on SW 3 12th
Street.
7.
Both 10lh Place SW and 11 th Place SW are currently designated as a minor collector street by
the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP). Full street improvements within the 6O-foot
right-of-way are required. Public right-of-way and the stormwater detention tract (Tract C) will
be dedicated to the City.
8.
ill order to implement the City of Federal Way policies of the Federal Way Comprehensive
Plan, the applicant's Traffic Engineer shall analyze future traffic volumes, and provide
preliminary plans for any needed traffic calming measures. Prior to issuance of construction
permits, these measures shall be presented to the impacted neighborhoods in a Traffic Safety
meeting conducted by the applicant and consistent with City policy and procedures. Prior to
issuance of construction permits, traffic calming measures proposed by applicant's Traffic
Engineer and approved by the impacted neighborhoods shall be submitted for review and
approval to the City Public Works Department. Installation of the improvements and all
segmented phased steps of the traffic calming measures shall occur prior to final plat approval.
Noyes Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner's Report
File No- 03-104054/ Doc. ID 31241
Page 12
EXHIBIT ...b...-
PAGE...LOF ..L
9.
The subject site contains 35 significant trees. The applicant has proposed to remove two
significant trees with site grading for the installation of roadway, stonn drainage facility, and
utilities. The remaining significant trees will be regulated under FWCC Section 22-1568 during
residential building permit review. .
10. Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-155, the applicant proposes on-site open space in the amount of
41.38%, established in two open space tracts. The open space will be dedicated to the
Homeowners Association.
11. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant will be required to submit a landscape
plan depicting open space planting, detention tract screening, street trees, and tree conservation
techniques.
12. Water and sewer facilities are available from the Lakehaven Utility District and are adequate to
serve the proposed development. It is the applicant's responsibility to secure all necessary water
and sewer services from the utility providers.
13. The proposed preliminary plat is permitted by FWCC Chapter 20, Subdivisions, and Chapter
22, Zoning.
14. The proposed subdivision and all attachments have been reviewed for compliance with the
FWCP; FWCC Chapter 18, Environmental Protection; Chapter 20, Subdivisions; Chapter 22,
Zoning; and all other applicable codes and regulations. As proposed, and recommended by
staff, the preliminary plat is consistent with the FWCP and all applicable codes and regulations.
15. Prior to final plat approval and recording, all required and approved improvements will be
constructed, or the improvements appropriately bonded, per City code requirements.
XII RECOMMENDA TlONS
Based on review of this application, the environmental record, and pertinent decisional criteria, staff
recommend approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions:
1.
Final plat approval shall require full compliance with drainage provisions set forth in the
FWCC. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location oflots as shown on the
preliminary approved plat.
A.
Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 KCSWDM and amendments
adopted by the City of Federal Way. City of Federal Way approval ofthe drainage and
roadway plans is required prior to any construction.
B.
The runoff control facilities within the Noyes Plat shall be located within a separate tract
(Tract C) that is landscaped to screen the facility from the right-of-way and adjacent
residential uses and to allow for appropriate maintenance of the facility, and shall be
dedicated to the City of Federal Way. Tracts A and B shall be owned, landscaped, and
maintained by the homeowners association. The homeowners association shall also
maintain screening vegetation in Tract C. A landscape plan for Tracts A, B, and C shall be
submitted to the City for review and approval as part of the plan.
Noyes Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner's Report
File No. 03-104054/ D<><.I.D. 31241
Page 13
EXHIBIT ~
PAGEJ Þ OF ~
C.
Prior to approval of engineering plans, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction
of the site City that the proposed development shall not impact wetland hydrology.
2.
The final plat drawing shall dedicate Tract A and B open space tracts to be owned in common
and maintained by property owners of the proposed subdivision, and shall prohibit removal or
disturbance of vegetation and landscaping within the tract, except as necessary for maintenance
or replacement of existing plantings and as approved by the City. No vegetation is to be
removed from Tract A. Additional vegetation may be located in open space Tract B to meet
conditions as approved by the City. A note shall be included on the final plat map that the open
space tracts shall not be further subdivided, may not be developed with any buildings or other
structures except as may be approved by the City for recreational purposes only for the benefit
of the homeowners, and may not be used for financial gain.
3.
Prior to issuance of construction permits, a final landscape plan prepared by a licensed
landscape architect shall be submitted to the City for approval, and shall include the following
elements:
A.
Open space and/or park landscaping in Tract B;
B.
Street trees in right.of-way landscape planter strips;
C.
Tree preservation plan; and
D.
Visual screening ofthe Tract C storm drainage facilities from the adjacent 11th Place SW
and fTom adjacent residential lots with landscaping and fencing. Chain link or cyclone
fencing, if used, shall be coated black or green and shall be screened by vegetation.
4.
10th Place SW extending into 11 th Place SW shall be improved through the project as a minor
collector, including 6O.foot wide right-of-way and 36-foot wide pavement width, curb and
gutter, four.foot planter strips, and five-foot wide sidewalks on both sides of the roadway,
streetlights, and street trees.
5.
The design for retaining walls and rockeries, if used on the subject site, shall be harmonious
with existing adjoining residential uses, and shall promote residential design themes through
such means as terracing, orientation, natural material selection, use of vegetation, and textural
treatment.
6.
To minimize the potential or inadvertent wetland setback area intrusions by human activity,
pedestrian related activity within the adjacent open space Tract B should be restricted fTom the
wetland setback area with rail fencing and signage. Prior to issuance of construction permits,
rail fencing approved by the City shall be depicted around the wetlands buffer subjectto
pedestrian activity and appropriate signage and locations identified. The fencing and signage
shall be installed prior to final plat approval and shall be maintained by the homeowners
association. -
7.
Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall dedicate twelve feet of land for future right-of-
way, adjacent to SW 31th Street.
8.
Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall analyze future traffic volumes,
provide plans for any necessary traffic calming devices and conduct a neighborhood traffic
Noyes Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner's Report
File No. 03-104054/ D<:>c W 31241
EXHIBiT ~ ,
PAGE ,., OF
safety meeting to present the findings. Traffic calming measures proposed by applicant's
Traffic Engineer and approved by the impacted neighborhoods shall be submitted for review
and approval to the City Public Works Department prior to issuance of construction permits.
9.
Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall install approved traffic calming measures and
any segmented phased steps.
XIII
LIST OF EXHIBITS
A. Reduced Scale Noyes Preliminary Plat - Site Plan, Preliminary Clearing and Grading Plan, and
Significant Tree/Retention Plan dated October 25, 2004
B. Vicinity Map
C. Legal Description
D. Notice of Application
E. Notice of Application Mailing List
F. Citizen Comments to Notice of Application (l through 7)
G. City Responses to Comments
H. SEP A Mailing List
1. Determination ofNonsignificance (DNS)
J. Staff Evaluation with Environmental Checklist
K. SEPA Comment Letter
L. Level I Off Site Analysis dated July 28, 2003
M. Technical Report (TIR) dated October 13, 2004
N. Plant List - undated
0 Wetland Assessment dated June 13,2001
P. Wetland Functional Assessment dated July 10,2004
Q. Hydrologic Assessment dated October 15, 2004
R. School Route Report dated October 23, 2003
S.Park Analysis dated September 11,2003
T. Sewer Certificate dated June 2, 2003
U. Water Certificate dated June 2, 2003
TRANSMIITED TO THE PARTIES LISTED HEREAFTER:
Federal Way Hearing Examiner
Applicant
DMP Engineers
Noyes Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner's Report
File No. 03-! 04054/ Doc. I.D. .31241
Page 15
EXHIBIT ~
PAGE IS (iF7'r
all I -~-- ) II Me ALP"'" ADCmO"
~ ¿ ~OL, '22 rit;;,if 1'ft~,h "A"
~. :i
--~-' .:~~,:~::-.:_._;..>",."_:,"",,
..
----
'"
«
oJ
PREUMINARY PLAT OR
NOYES
A PORTION OR
NE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 7, TWP. 21N, ANa. 4E, WM.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
@ I.;..)II ~C ALP"'" A.DOLT10N......,.
~ IC VOL- '22{riti"..';f ~ :'"- ..,
. ~ == -.L... --
;..=_.'c-':-..'.:::.;:-:.-.~.t,';';;;¡;;;;':~.:::'-.,-..,:,::.,-",.:,,....,
-
----
~,.T-~_'._--.-.'..
.......
..."'" ,,"""...'" ""-.
"""""A'
--
"'-.., ..."..
,~
.
...
i
':..1'
L.EŒNO
þ ............
Z ... ....... "'"
. R .... ....
D-
~ U"""""'"
~ ... -...-.
- u_...-
. ..."..--.
-.._-
--..--
......-....-
"'0 ø-
. .........
. ø-
. ø-
,......",-.........
.... -... '" .-. ..
. --tnOJ
. --
..... :=.."::'
i:
.:r 'if
II
.1
0-
..." -
-~
',-,.
-. ,
,.'
,6
",.'
,"
","
.'.
. .
PIIO!'OIIEP LAI'CUT
(1IIŒS""""""""""",
CIU.PIÐC =
NaIE8o
. nu-""-""""II""""""""'_'-~""""""""
FOR ....... .......... AN. ""'" -..... ..... "" N'Æm 11£ """"" OF 1JI1( '" THr -
""'--
k ~'11..",=,,';"::"'~.."'tr..&:: ~ fí.'=-:'.: !:'~.
=..a.:æ ~ ~~- OF _..,....... "-CÇ>I$JI\UOIEÐ OR '" ..
1 0I8.Ð:I" -.0 11£ ""'" .. """" ............ SIDPO ... OUTS OR .... ... "'" """"""" ......
-..........
/ia;~~.~~---"'1HE""""""""--
1 -,"1(...""""""" IE _10 ,.....
k.._-Lt..J ~
,~-,
,_.M "
t.!EN)W o
~c.u.
... PUff '" - '""" -- "'/It-I>
..... OF ~
""- """"',.,.OF ",.... ow
-.......,...
IMTIM
CIIY"'--
~
II!!ItCtIINtCo
~""':"~,~"\"..."',,"":.," 0«,.
"""'- nu,
U!QAL CI!IIaW'I1ONo
nc"""""""1HE_-"""--
OF"" """"- OMrtJIOF""""", ',- 2t -... -.
.....,U"~""-.-
"""-_UWCWJJIIH"""'II!IIm.
CI'II'IEII/ŒYB.
-- .....
"'0' """ ... ..
=~=.
- 05>-2
-. ""'01--
-- ~n ""'" (>01.211 so. ITJ
--""'" -"--'T_DENSm
-- -......-
- '-UlJUlTDISIIO::f
-- ':It.
IETBACK:I
- )g'
--- ~
""-"-"- .,.
~""'oP8<.IŒ(1 It,Cf'A~ 27,'01 SO.FT. '~.53S Of SIf[
II.I'P'I!I\ CI'eI.- """"" 'A~ 42.>21 so. FT. 20.1"" Of SIT[
I8ALI! - ....."""""..., ",?to SO. FT. 7.'31 Of' SIT[
1CT... OS~J.2 SQ. n. 41.3a11 Of SIll:
.OP£N SPAŒ IIR£A>CI>D¥IM -01otD BT P"",
0fItCT0R IN ACCORDN«[ - F'WCC 2O- ~O (4) (C)
f i """'°,
~
':'
QCi111111!
L I> OCT :i ... OfT """'. LrntR to -"" ..
, OCT "'" OIT ..... O"'M'"
. PAU;. NOYEII
""" ,... 1'L U. """"'- "T, .,., ...,...
-,.(.1")"'-"'"
_""T'"
!tOYES (03-~J
-""'"
:,';:u.,od" I=- :.":"
-.1-
. ---L-
I' ,'......; J-I"...J.... ¡
......("--]-'" '
"'--¡---L I
ttij'..! ¡i
.' ¡ !
. I
".00
"'00
~ CI!OB!I SECTION A-A
.... e......... e..'-
I'C!Ð aIOS!J III!CI1CN HI
.....,'--. ,'.r-
NOYES
PRELMNAAY CLEARING AND GRADING PLAN
A PORTION OF<
IE 1/4, fffl 1/4, lEe. " 1VÆ'..2IN, PIQ 4E, WJ.l.
CfTY OF FEDERAL WAY, KJNQ COUNTY, WASI-I'fGTON
~---
---_.
-----
-----
CL.eANtQ All) QIIADItQ PUN
10' ~:rJ~ i' id
~R.
60' . .
!lOAD c:: ~~ oer.iL RESUBMlTIED
---..-
. OCI1 ¡oo¡
.' .
L.f!CIEIC)
þ ,~-"-
X "'....."" "^,,""-'"
~
j "'""""'"
-<>- ,~ UtILI" """
}:N "',"""""""-'","01<,
". .n.... -...,
,~ CA",. ...... """ .
- ,~ 0.- ""'"
- '" WOOl> '""'"
'" ""'M' ...... .-.u£
-a- """'"
" w""'"
""""""'.
æ "'-,
(3275!!1)....,. ,.. ..om No.
OC30 - T.. '.oen No
~ ""',...~...,
- (1P<cn _fIJI)
ø
¡~"":';....\ .
(1-"".. ""All
i
3'~
"'". :'11-
'I t
~
GRAPHIC SCALI:
~ ~ ~
. ~._
,....... ~
~NC.
--":"ImÞ;s!~",!Jj'g!....
O<T ..1... Qrr "'- ""'" " .10M ..
PAIl.. HO1I!II
,.." "" "'- ...., """""- "'r. "", ....,
-E"'~",""""-
NOYES (0G-DI054-00-eU)
_cu.wa_-........
In I:,. ~ I ::- -::;,- - ,
U!CIIHI
Þ "'""".",,""""
X ... ...rot ..", ",-lot
.
f " kOWOFF
-<>- ,~ .,.".., P<IlE
þ---$ ,~ "'""" ...., """M
,~"""" ....."..,.
,~ CA'CI< ""'" ",.,.
-D,"""""-I/«Ft"'"
-- " """" ..,<C:,
D"""""'" """.",,"HIU
D ~...
.. ... ..,.,.
.. "........
$ ex """"001
(327 ~6') "..... TAM ","en .~
0030 -"- "'" PARCEI.'~
it ""..... S-ICM<T - I""" .""'I!D)
Ð ......... mEET .....
...... ....-TI!.D<OOE .......
"""~1'--
~ """"""" ITR!£! YOt!t
~ ...."'..-
.. (!PECII:S """"", .--.....,. '!IItt5)
D
1<.0." """'........
-~...
~
~
NOTES:
1. .....~_....~~,¡,~~~
~ ... 1REØ~"'t.f......... ME _. ;
~ """,...........-.......""""""",....arr...___, !
'UuDf:."". ~~"'~"". ""-"""'OØ'UI'T""""--,!
):::I- ':>( - '""" ... to .. 0EDI:P.'ItD TO M: ....... !
C) ... . i.
m... ¡
- '
'CD
CIO-
~
b
-n
II
I
oJ
F'AEL.IMINAfIY PLAT OF:
NOYES
SlGNIRCANT TReE I AECflEAllON PLAN
A PORTION OF-- .
NE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 7, TWP. 21N, ANa 4E, WM
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
~~
- - ~,,~~?~";~~~"7'
~
.,~... . " ..~
. ~ 0..
~
^
",'M>
F
.
~
~ "'~
~ ~j
:$ f
~~ a
OJ
Ï~
:i
j ~1
.
;:
~
¡r:nJ~,:
~o ,K¡iil."....~.. j
.,.", H1¡ : i
~, " Ifr..~:ll
.. W'.L:~I
I'IIOf'OBE) I..AYOUT
GRAPHIC SCALE
'h........:......u 1.
,._,
,_.....
"1IlOO'.,. ¡-
;. "", 000
"..01'. ":,-,,
~:;" .7
,. ",7.
,.
.~
¡-
.s ",eo
6.'f
=---CPlN"""""aIIOC'I""'" v,"", SUT.
_c:reo._-'",,¡ 420'" so. FT.
......... ...... mvocr.., 14.11 D SO. FT,
-... 8un SO. FT.
!J,$!!I ... SITE
OD.12I ... sm:
1.1.. or sm:
.,..n OF SITE
,",EN 'PAC<: 8....1>0... _-.ro 8T P_S
DIR'CTtO' IN ACCCfOOANCE ..1\1 FWCC ,')-155 (4) (()
3\ 5' 14' 8' 10' 10' 8' 4' 5' 3'
~ 'or"" I I I """". Irt:j":.'
~ , ~ "
36' I.
Û¡' .
,. f
"
I!OAD CROe8 æcT1QH DETAl.
-mH PI.. 8.'N.
---...-
RESU8MmED
OCT O1:!1D!
'..
or
1 I" OCT
"""
PDt a,.., ...... """" " .... ..
...""'.......-
~...... NOYE8
.,,'" ,... "- ..'" ........ ...,. "', ..."
'H<>« ... ""»11<--
-,..""
---.,......
~
-'
. ,
..
City of File #' \.¡) -1.04054-SU ~~~~:;d~~\~:~2QQ5
. v GIS DlVis (m
Federa.1 Way Noyes Preliminary Plat ~3~2~O:II1¡¡Ä~s.
V. .. M Federal Way wa. 98063
~ IClnlty ap~ (206) .835 . 7000
wWW.cl!ycflede¡alway.ccm
Legend
,
OF c=J King County Tax: Lots.
---.. Taxlot 072104-9082
~ . Fëéteral Way
N
0 300 600 1,200 Feet
I I I I I
Thi. map 10 inttndtl1 {or ".. .. 1 ~rapnloa1 rlpr...ntation only.
Th. CII)I of Fed""¡ Wiy ml~.' no wlrranty II!O ill Iccu'"OI.
H3~ .02 05 09: 1Sa
Tugb~
2062428345
p. 1
18415 441h Ave So
ScaTac. VVa 98188
Janua.!)' 31. 2004
--- ~._~
'ro
òê'ð I.';A-I!..t<£;,~
FÁ)< 1- 5" "3 - Ç3 .:; )" - :he., 09
City of Federal Way
33530 First Way So
PO Box 9718
FederalVVay, Wa 98063-9718
Attn: Deb Barker"
f'/¿DM ,f\/ J c:. íf L-
rA ì< 2-c:.:\ (,
(3 PA e,,6s
'IL-> <:-1,,1'"3 '(
- 2. '-t '2 -' ~'3 "5 Lf',Ç'
r:o .- A t-.-')
5-/ 2. }o Ç'
Subject:
Noyes Preliminary Plate 10-01-03
My wife and 1 own the property due west ofthili project - 3121912th Ave SW.
Your plat notice was received late because Our renter fo~ot to forwar"d the
notice to us. We just received it two days ago.
We have ~evéral questions ..e~ardin~ the proposed Noye4" laYOld dated 10-01-03;
A. We have been gcttin~ several inches of water in our crawl space under the
house du...in~ the winter rainy season.
Q_.cstion:
Who will be responsible for rnaintainin~ proper draina~~ out
of the pond and wetland buffer zone? i.e. clcaring pond outlct
area and draina~e piping to keep pond level at 288.7 ft
elevation. (This elevation number was listed on Mirror Wood
Form.al Drainage Plans I reviewed in your officc about a year
3.~o.
B. What t..ee removal/surface grading wiD be done in the wetland buffer area.c¡?
Scvcr"allal1!:C tr~es are currc..tly on the surveyed property lilies. Our back
fence is pW"esently located several feet to the west of this I¡ne as was the
neighbor's back fence.
C. A 5 ft wide gravel trail, trail sign and picnic tables are shown. Several fence
type lines are drawn around the wetland bulrer ~reas and adjacent to the
proposed c..l~de--sac.
Question: Will the ~eneralpublíc use this trail and picnic tables?
D. Tract "A" wetland to be dedicated to the public.
Question: What use or retrictions wiU be enforced on the pond and
wetland buffer areas? What liabUity. if any, will we be subjected to in
case of accidents, drowning, etc.?
EXHIBIT a-'
PAGE , OF r
Ma~ 02 05 09:20a
Tuç:b~
20621-2831-5
p.2
Answers to the above questions will help us better understand the scope of this
projcd Jlnd potential impads on our property.
.Please send any future correspondence regarding this proj«t to our home
address. If you have any questions re~ard.ng the above çommcnts, please çall
me at 206-244-8409.
Thank yOu
~.( 4 ':7-
Nigel Tugby
EXHIBIT _C rl
PAGE~OF 3.
Ma~ 02 05 09:20a Tu;b~
¿..;..":;> ) - (,d... I - '+ I G ,$
\)Ç ('J ßA.!..~t<'.'2 - :5-'>l-ft¡¡V"d;..""J
--
j,J. / "'... -.'.', ~ ~
'J L '(: ,;' 'J
,3 'I "2-1 (j
\ ), .i. /Iv:!
"'-.I ","'If If ","I"" ""
'" 1""",1 ',', '
I :;ro\NfIAI\O".
11", W,)".... "'1<1':'\1",
2062428345
p.3
PHEUMINAAY PLAT 01-:"-;
NOYES
~';JGNII :'C^N ¡ '1IìLL / I U~CI~r':AIION fJL^N
^ I 'OR110N OF:
NI: II;}, SW 1/<1, SF:C, 7, TWP. ~IN, riNG. liE, W.M
CJlY 01': f'L.:U!:H^I. W^Y, KING COUN'¡Y, W^St'iINGTON
.: '1'/ ¡
I~" ' I
)
I'~'
,,,'
\'A' v;:,II'~I:!I.,.::~¡ ','.'i1""¡ ,~'::'..:,^,
.. ',," ""'" .." " ""',," .",
¡
.J
'I'
i"-
i "'II:..""""", I'
.
"
J
:,./-- n- __"¡~."I'~':-":':::""':_" ;. ._~~\~:¡~¡-w_.;';~ I~___~~J_~.
.,'/ ,-' \ ,,~_'I.I.¡-.'"" .""" ""."".""""""""'<0,,1
,:'/ ..¡!', """.li""""'" '\..1-'."1"""1"'" I.
/',::~;" ;11'," \l ,:::~~:,.,...::;: ()'~,¡,:r~';(:,::"
,Y '.',.,\ ,;, ..'. ' ",. I ,.. "" ,'"",,'!
"(I".,, <. . ..~, ,.) ~.
.-;:"~o;:~~.;t'{);;~::::J,, ..'. ":.~:,~:,.. . L ;: ~~i' fi
.~.~, q ",~"".,h'¡r"..,."".,..".., "CO." """'!. .."'",, "'"
. ."._".""(,,,:',~î:' ~.,,~ t~,:.~.("~,~;,~,,b';':;,,~,~~l ~".',,':..,;~.~,',/C,¡~:;',~,.¡ ,'."'..',...,:,A
'..d;;' "\,.:".",,../:,:;:.... ~"'~'-,::--'."" -¥{""...."".J.""".-..,-"~.",.,\,,,
, " f: """""'(:"1'~~,/ ':\",:",;.",:.:";~:>.:..::.,.:~"~,,,,:.(~,~~,;\;~....,,",
, ""~"""""""' "C ") "\..' CI"'I" " '""/"..Jc:,'..',,, "',"". "
:,'", , ..,',~".!:~:,.'~,f'" '., ,," .,""", ",'..'" ::' :;",,;~, ",::,:.j~~>"~.r~..".,,.~(',.:.~., :5.',:,'~"',~.'~;',""~""',,,,",'-"""""""."
.. c, 1 '[ ,-,...~I A,y¡'-,.,,¡ ,.
.. II, ..I~~~' "..';", \," :~¿~.." """"Af:.>: ,'/rø"'~<"::,,, ~<.. , " ('{"r.; ",'
,,;)VÞ'i} '::., x~""\/_",.""".."-"""",,, ::-\'r~;~
.' .--...-.,,--..-.-1' ,/.~.. , '... ,.\.:;;,-..- .,"
,,:,:':::~:,'.I .. .;:', ,"~"/ /ìi,"~"":...;:'::t:..,,, """~::.~:',~: ",,'
:/5:"",.,.:,- I_I."".."" ('~/('//)"'-""'-",- "'-'d',,""'.)::.
e~.!/g::klt ..... ,-- _,("If)!-¡!..:.,::" '-'-"'---'-.-...-.-. ,;i:';.r?.':':/'/
",," c""" , II- () ., 'I.'
I': ""...., ""':"'1"1'/ ''..""-",,,. F' ;:/.-'
~,). :.h'~~;~¡;':~IC;;~'~1 "(~'¡) ?~,:\------.._-~. ¥..¡\_../"-f,....,
.... " ,/,'", ..." . 1 . I - - . '. ' , \ ::
I 1"'¡"'II'~;'("")1I l,I,!\')'-" ~,J'..,,\
~'.~'.. ,,"'I.""'," \.11);(-'1\""" i.i:"'\\"~i'"
".,:~"...,Q' ....._,----,-::-,, ,\~,~J :0.","",...", ~::",.'..'J//'
'j , .'1 Niù\x)"u"wl":" ;:i. ~" -,--.- \.
¡' I .;,'¡
'v .~: 7() ,', :C::1 I',J <I".n woO\) \
.. .."'" " :'1:' ,..A"'"""";)/' , \', \
~ If";" vl",,~:"'1 ," ... \ ",-."
.. " I I ; ,'.'." I ,',- 'Ie' CI"'"
l' .,"," j¡ I,' - . ---- nl
; ! I ;:¡ \" ,>, ,,<0 \
"
,',
"'",
,~' v
.,
';¡;A ~ '111" :;
"I
PROPO.':;EO LAY our
r-;M'¡~T-. -m__-
EXHIBIT ~~""~ ":;,
PAGE -3-o~~:'::lJ
COMU RECEIVED BY
UNRYDEVElOPMENTDEPARTMENT
MAR 2 2 2005
Paul Noyes
31327 10th PL SW
Federal Way, W A 98023
March 19, 2005
City Of Federal Way
33325 8th Av South
P. O. Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
RE:
File #O3-104055-000-00-SE, Environmental Threshold Determination
Noyes' Preliminary Plat
Dear Ms. McClung:
These comments are forwarded within the formal 14 day comment period as required by
SEP A rules. The findings are there are no significant adverse environmental impacts. I
would like to point out some positive environmental impacts by the short plat that are
apparently beyond the scope of review.
I. Subject short plat would intercept surface water at the east boundary that now
is running into the wet land untreated.
2. The short plat would block surface water at the south end iTom draining
directly onto existing street, 11 PL SW, but would not detain and treat before flowing
into existing storm sewer.
3. Proposed fencing would delineate and better protect wetland buffer.
In addition to positive impacts to the environment, there are benefits to the neighborhood
such as:
I. Two existing dead-end streets now without turnarounds would be connected.
2. Police and Fire would have a shorter and more direct access to the
neighborhood to the south.
3. Neighborhood children would have a much shorter walk to school.
EXHIBIT ~
PAGE --LOF -Ì-
4. The small increase in traffic on lOth PL SW would coincide with the City's
plans to add a turn lane on 312th.
5. The approved short plat would convey right of way along 312th for street
widening, thus avoiding the need for the City to purchase the land.
RespectfuHy.
~~~
31327 10th PL SW
EXHIBIT C! ...~
PAGE~OF ~
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, W ASIDNGTON, APPROVING WITH
CONDITIONS THE NOYES PRELIMINARY PLAT, FEDERAL
WAY FILE NO. 03-104054-00-SU.
WHEREAS, owner Paul Noyes applied to the City of Federal Way for preliminary plat approval to
subdivide certain real property known as Noyes Preliminary Plat and consisting of 4.74 acres into eight
(8) single-family residential lots at 31327 10th Place SW; and
WHEREAS, on March 9, 2005, an Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was
issued by the Director of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services pursuant to the
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner on May 10,2005, held a public hearing
concerning the Noyes Preliminary Plat; and
Whereas, following the conclusion of said hearing, on May 24, 2005, the Federal Way Land Use
Hearing Examiner issued a written Report and Recommendation containing findings and conclusions, and
recommending approval of the Noyes Preliminary Plat subject to conditions set forth therein; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council has jurisdiction and authority pursuant to Section 20-
127 of the Federal Way City Code to approve, deny, or modify a preliminary plat and/or its conditions;
and
WHEREAS, on June 6, 2005, the City Council Land UselTransportation Committee considered the
record and the Hearing Examiner recommendation on the Noyes Preliminary Plat, pursuant to Chapter 20
of Federal Way City Code, Chapter 58.17 RCW, and all other applicable City codes, and voted to forward
a recommendation for approval of the proposed Noyes Preliminary Plat to the full City Council, with no
changes to the Hearing Examiner recommendation; and
Res. #
,Page 1
EXHIBIT Þ
PAGE , OF -L
WHEREAS, on June 21, 2005, the City Council considered the record and the Hearing Examiner
recommendation on the Noyes Preliminary Plat, pursuant to Chapter 20 of Federal Way City Code,
Chapter 58,17 RCW, and all other applicable City codes.
Now THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Adoption of Findings of Fact and Conclusions.
1.
The findings of fact and conclusions of the Land Use Hearing Examiner's May 24,2005
Report and Recommendation, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference, are hereby
adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Federal Way City Council. Any finding deemed to be a
conclusion, and any conclusion deemed to be a finding, shall be treated as such.
2.
Based on, inter alia, the analysis and conclusions in the Staff Report and Hearing
Examiner's recommendation, and conditions of approval as established therein, the proposed subdivision
makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare, and for such open spaces,
drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary
waste, parks and recreation, play grounds, schools and schools grounds, and all other relevant facts as are
required by City code and state law, and provides for sidewalks and other planning features to assure safe
walking conditions for students who walk to and ITom school.
3.
The public use and interest will be served by the preliminary plat approval granted
herein.
Section 2. Application Approval. Based upon the recommendation of the Federal Way Land Use
Hearing Examiner and findings and conclusions contained therein as adopted by the City Council
immediately above, the Noyes Preliminary Plat, Federal Way File No. 03-104054-00-SU, is hereby
approved, subject to conditions as contained in the May 24, 2005, Report and Recommendation of the
Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner (Exhibit A). .
Section 3. Conditions of Approval Integral. The conditions of approval of the preliminary plat are
all integral to each other with respect to the City Council finding that the public use and interest will be
Res. #
, Page 2
EXHIBIT ~
PAGE~~
served by the platting or subdivision of the subject property. Should any court having jurisdiction over the
subject matter declare any of the conditions invalid, then, in said event, the proposed preliminary plat
approval granted in this resolution shall be deemed void, and the preliminary plat shall be remanded to the
City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner to review the impacts of the invalidation of any condition or
conditions and conduct such additional proceedings as are necessary to assure that the proposed plat
makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare and other factors as
required by RCW Chapter 58.17 and applicable City ordinances, rules, and regulations, and forward such
recommendation to the City Council for further action.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution should be held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause,
or phrase of this resolution.
Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of the
resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the
Federal Way City Council.
RESOLVED BY 1HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, THIS - DAY
OF
,2005.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MA YOR, DEAN MCCOLGAN
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
Res. #
, Page 3
EXHIBIT 'þ
PAGE3-0F -L
APPROVED AS To FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED By THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION No.
Res. #
, Page 4
EXHIBIT 1:)
PAGE ~OF -Y-
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
June 6, 2005
Land Use and Transportation Committee
David H. M~anager
Rick Perez, P.E., ð{~ ~ra~fic Engineer ær
2005 City Wide Pavement Marking - Project Bid Award
POLICY QUESTION: Should City of Federal Way Land Use and Transportation recommend to City Council
approval ofthe lowest responsive bidder and award a contract for the 2005 City Wide Pavement Marking contract
to Strip Rite, Inc.?
BACKGROUND: On Apri1141h staff sent a request for quotes (RFQ) to all contractors on the small works roster
who have the capabilities of executing pavement markings, neighborhood traffic safety devices, and
channelization services within pre-determined deadlines. One (1) quote was received and opened on May 91\
2005 for the subject project. See the attached tabulation summary. Stripe Rite, Inc. who also was awarded the
same contract for the 2003 City Wide Pavement Marking was the lowest responsive responsible quote. Staff
completed a comparison of the 2003 unit costs as compared to the 2005 unit costs and Strip Rite, Inc. are
consistent in their quotes.
Schedule A (Basic Pavement Markings)
Schedule B (Basic Traffic Calming Devices)
Schedule C (Discretionary Work Orders Anticipated)
$14,100.00
$33,840.00
$ 7,366.22
Funding for the Basic and Discretionary work is included in the 200512006 operating budget at $98,000 for two
years.
OPTIONS:
1. Award contract to Stripe Rite, Inc. for two years using the unit prices quoted.
2, Reject quote from Stripe Rite, Inc, and reissue Request for Quotes for the proposed work.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the following item be placed on the June 21 "t, 2005 Council
consent agenda:
Authorize the City Manger to execute a two-year contract with Stripe Rite, Inc. in the amount of $98,000
for basic and discretionary pavement marking, neighborhood traffic safety devices, and channelization
servlCes.
Committee Recommendation:
Forward Option 1 to the ,Junc 21'" 2005 City Council Consent Agenda.
.~",~,
.,-"..,
API)ROVAL ()}: COMMITTEE RI!:J)ORT:
, "
" ,
"',--
..._.~..
""""--_....,,
,
,
""""i¡:¡c ¡"aisc)i~,Mcn~h~r .."'..-" -," ¡
,
¡
"""."'-
" '.. ""-."J"~'cI( J)o~ey Chï,¡'r"-'- , ' ,
. "---"'-"
.""""""'-"-""",
Michael Park. Member
K:\LUTC\2005\O6-06-05 2005-2006 Pavement Markings RFQ.doc
APPENDIX A
REQUEST FOR QUOTE
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
2005-06 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT MARKING PROJECT
Total Minimum Budget = $98,000 for two years
Vendor Name:
v-, .--v-- ~ _U_'V' 'U_.,- my. n.., ~ ~v -~-~"-_v -"vv, -_v..vu .,-.
Item Estimated Annual Quantity Unit
A-1 Plastic Crosswalk (8" ladder style) 5000 SF
A-2 Piastic Stop Line (18") 800 SF
A-3 Piastic Arrow Leaend Svrnbol or Letter 50 EA
Total of Schedule A
--..----- - _.__._n"-' ..-... -.--.-..- _n_..-_- _..n. _nn.... -
Item Quantitv Range Unit
C-1 Paint Line 1 5000 LF
5001 SOOOOO LF
500001 + LF
C-2 Remove Paint Line 1 5000 LF
5001 25000 LF
25001 + LF
C-3 Painted Wide Line 1 1000 LF
1001 5000 LF
S001 + LF
C-4 Remove Painted Wide Line 1 1000 LF
1001 SOOO LF
5001 + LF
C-S Plastic Crosswaik (8" x1 O' ladder slvie) 1 SOO SF
(
5001 + SF
C-6 Remove Plastic Crosswalk 1 500 SF
501 5000 SF
SO01 + SF
C-7 Plastic Stoo line 118") 1 200 LF
801 + LF
C-8 Remove Plastic Stop Line 1 200 LF
201 800 LF
801 + LF
C-9 Piaslic Arrow Leaend Svmooi, or Letter 1 10 EA
56 + EA
C-10 Remove Plastic Arrow, Legend, Symool, or Letter 1 10 EA
11 50 EA
51 + EA
Total
$8,SOO.00
$2,000.00
$2.450.00
$12,950.00
Unit Price
". OAIf
0.1ti
0.08
.1m
:,:,:;;:,~?S
i;;UJt50
0.50
0.25
0.10
2.01)
1.50
o.äti
,.,..J..
,.c.,
Total*
0.17
500.10
40.000.08
1.00
3,750.75
12,500.50
0.50
250.25
500.10
2.00
1,501.50
4,000.80
3.00
1,002.00
8.7S1.75
3.00
1,002.00
8.751.75
4.00
603.00
1.602.00
4.00
603.00
1,602.00
100.00
715.00
3,080.00
100.00
82S.oo
2.295.00
1200S Strip rltê!k1!sts
Total
--š9:250.00
$2.400.00
$14,100.00
Total
$23,670.00
$10.170.00
$33,840.00
Unit Price Total"
0.1} 0.17
... O,O~ 450.09
o.Oð 40000.08
1.00 1.00
0.75 3,750.75
0.50 12Soo.50
0.50 0.50
0.25 250.25
0.10 500.10
2.00 2.00
1,50 1,501.50
0:80 4.000.80
3.00 3.00
926.85
1.50 7501.50
3.00 3.00
1.80 901.80
.1.50 7S01.50
4.00 4.00
603.00
2.00 1602.00
4.00 4.00
2.75 552.75
2J¡O 1 602.00
73.00 73.00
539.00
43.00 2408.00
9000 90.00
50.00 550.00
30.00 1 530.00
C-11 Plastic Lirle 1 100 LF
101 500 LF
501 + LF
C-12 Remove Plastic Lne 1 100 LF
101 1000 LF
1001 + LF
G-13 Wide Plastic Line 1 100 LF
101 1000 LF
1001 + LF
C-14 Remove Wide Plastic Lit1e 1 100 LF
101 1000 LF
1001 + LF
C-15 Profiie£! Plastic Line 1 100 LF
101 1000 LF
1001 + LF
C-16 Remove Profiled Plastic LIne 1 100 LF
101 1000 LF
1001 + LF
C-17 Profiled Wide Plastic Line 1 100 LF
101 1000 LF
1001 + LF
C-1a Remove Profiied Wide Plasüc Line 1 100 LF
101 1000 LF
1001 + LF
C-19 Plastic Dolle£! Extension Line 1 100 LF
101 500 LF
501 + LF
C-20 Remove Plastic Dolled Extension Lirle 1 100 LF
101 500 LF
501 + LF
C-21 Misceilaneous Plastic Pavement Markings 1 50 SF
51 250 SF
251 + SF
C-22 Remove Miscellaneous Plastic Pavement Markings 1 50 SF
51 250 SF
251 + SF
C-23 Plastic Yield Line 1 24 EA
(24"x36" = 3 sq It triangles) 25 100 EA
101 + EA
C.24 Remove Piastic Yield Line 1 24 EA
25 100 EA
101 + EA
C-25 Profiled Plastic Dolled Extension Line 1 100 LF
101 500 LF
501 + LF
C-26 Remove Profiled Plastic Dolled Extension LIne 1 100 LF
101 500 LF
501 + LF
G-27 Durastripe LIne 1 100 LF
(Plastic type D METHYLMETHACRYLA TE) 101 500 LF
501 + LF
C-2a Remove Durastripe Line 1 100 LF
101 500 LF
501 + LF
C-29 Profiied Durastripe Line 1 100 LF
101 500 LF
501 + LF
C.::!: 0.00
(}.()() 0.00
!J.O~ 0.00
O.tÑ 0.00
COO 0.00
::I.Or) 0.00
C.G~I 0.00
::!.coi 0.00
o.c<:~ 0.00
û.X¡ 0.00
O.C{:! 0.00
0 o~ 0.00
OX 0.00
00:; 0.00
C.O;¡ 0.00
aD:; 0.00
C.DC 0.00
0.:10 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Ð.oo 0.00
~CCiI 0.00
D.CO' 0.00
"C..:; 5.00
3.eo' 303.00
1 :rr 501.00
3.CO, 3.00
leC, 202.00
U):: 501.00
20X 20.00
15.0: 765.00
10 D: 2 510.00
200: 20.00
150: 765.00
'C 0:; 2510.00
C.DC 0.00
0.00 0.00
000 0.00
0.00 0.00
OGO 0.00
i).X. 0.00
OC<Jt 0.00
o.:r) 0.00
0:;: 0.00
- ¡J.~: 0.00
(;0:; 0.00
O:;C 0.00
3.::': 3.00
".75 176.75
. .0:; 501.00
30:; 3.00
1.75 176.75
Eo! 501.00
¡tap! 0.00
OC'Ûi 0.00
C.X) 0.00
3.00-
roo
.Q.§Q
1.00
0.75
Q.§Q
3.50
2.00
.LQQ
1.50
1.00
0.75
5.00
3.00
2J1Q
1-25
1.00
0.16
rn
.4,50
>~
175
1.25
.LQQ
4.50
3.00
.LQQ
3.00
1.50
0.50
20.00
15.00
10.00
20.00
15.00
1000
12.00
1000
¡roo
10:00
7.50
5.00
5.50
4.25
ill
3.25
2.25
.l1.2
3.00
2.50
.l1Q
3.Q(J
2.00
.1.00.
3.00
101.00
250.50
1.00
75.75
500.50
3.50
202.00
1,001.00
1.50
101.00
750.75
5.00
303.00
2,002.00
1.25
101.00
750.75
5,75
454.50
3,003.00
1,75
126,25
1.001.00
4.50
303,00
501.00
3.00
151,50
250.50
20.00
765.00
2.510.00
20.00
765.00
2,510.00
12.00
250.00
806.00
10.00
187,50
505.00
5.50
429,25
1.377.75
3.25
227.25
~
3.00
252.50
676.35
3.00
202.00
501.00
5.00
404.00
1,002,00
C-30 Remove Profiled Durastripe Line 1 1 100 LF
101 SOO LF
501 + LF
C-31 Wide Durastripe Line 1 100 LF
101 500 LF
501 + LF
C-32 Remove Wkle Durastripe Line 1 100 LF
101 500 LF
501 + LF
C-33 Wide Profiled Durastripe Line 1 100 LF
101 500 LF
SO1 + LF
C-34 Remove Wide Durastripe Line 1 100 LF
101 SOO LF
501 + LF
C-35 Type I RPM 1 200 EA
201 1000 EA
1001 + EA
C-36 Remove Type I RPM 1 200 EA
201 1000 EA
1001 + EA
C-37 Type II RPM 1 200 EA
201 1000 EA
1001 + EA
C-38 Remove II RPM 1 200 EA
201 1000 EA
1001 + EA
C-39 Pre-Cast Traffic Curb 1 200 LF
201 1000 LF
1001 + LF
C-40 Remove Pre-Cast Traffic Curb 1 200 LF
201 1000 LF
1001 + LF
C-41 Biock TraffIC Curb 1 200 LF
201 1000 LF
1001 + LF
C-42 Remove Block Traffic Curb 1 200 LF
201 1000 LF
1001 + LF
C-43 Extruded Curb, Painted 1 200 LF
201 1000 LF
1001 + LF
C-44 Remove Extruded Curb 1 200 LF
201 1000 LF
1001 + LF
C-45 Crushed Rock 1 5 TON
6 25 TON
26 + TON
C-46 Aspha~ Surface 1 5 TON
6 25 TON
26 + TON
C-47 1 2 EA
3 9 EA
1 2
3 8
9+
0 :¡;i 0.00
¡;I.X,! 0.00
C,ç....; 0.00
o.œ¡ 0.00
Oç..:¡! 0.00
0:>:, 0.00
0 :¡:! 0.00
O.OC 0.00
CO~ 0.00
C.:r:. 0.00
C:X 0.00
0.00 0.00
00:; 0.00
a:j~ 0.00
D.!):} 0.00
25: 2.50
. 9: 381.90
. 6~ 1651.65
2.:J:: 2.00
;.0: 201.00
~ 75 750.75
::.0::; 5.00
3.(5 753.75
3.0:> 3 003.00
2.C::' 2.00
1.50 301.50
()7~ 750.75
1::.0J 15.00
11.0::; 2,211.00
1::0:) 10010.00
E.e::; 6.00
5.00 1,005.00
4.CO 4 004.00
1:2CO 12.00
9.CO 1,809.00
7(;01 7 007.00
6;:'3, 6.00
5~; 1,005.00
4.:>-:. 4 004.00
ex 6.00
4.7~ 954.75
365 3 653.65
6::!-: 6.00
5:J: 1,005.00
4 :¡: 4004.00
2:C.:>: 200.00
5~ :>: 300.00
~5 0: 910.00
3::".0: 300.00
17:: 0;:0 1,050.00
1...5.0::; 3250.00
2.750 C:> 2,750.00
2.: 75.(;0 6,525.00
21 750.00
3 20D.COI 3,200.00
2,350 !:C! 7,050.00
2350.~-C; 21 150.00
5.00 5.00
3.00 303.00
1.50. 751.50
4.50 4.50
3.50 353.50
2.50 1.252.50
4.50 4.50
2.00 202.00
1.50 751.50
8.00 8.00
6.00 606.00
4.00 2 004.00
3.00 3.00
"'.lOO 303.00
;';' ;'2;,00 1 002.00
, 2:60 2.60
2.10 422.10
,.1.65 1651.65
:1':'0.0 2.00
1.00 201.00
0,S5 850.85
5.ÖO 5.00
3.75 753.75
3.00 3 003.00
2.00 2.00
. 1.50 301.50
0.15 750.75
16.50 16.50
.15.00 3,015.00
11:110 11011.00
6:00 6.00
5.00 1,005.00
4.00 4 004.00
15.00 15.00
,-,; 12.00 2,412.00
9.00 9 009.00
6.0.0 6.00
5.00 1,005.00
4.00 4 004.00
750 7.50
6.00 1,206.00
4.75 4754.75
6.00, 6.00
5.00 1,005,00
4.00 4 004.00
125.00 125,00
50.00 300.00
35.00 910,00
"~OO,OO 300.00
200,00 1,200.00
170,00 4 420.00
2;iï~q;QO 2,830.00
2630,00 7,890.00
26300.00
3,~50,OO 3,250.00
3.Ö$O;(J0 9,150.00
3 ÓstÚ)O 27450.00
C-49
C-51 Remove Pedestrian Island
(Include asphaK patching)
C-52 Curb Ramp, Compiete
C-53 Curb Ramp, Complete
C-54 Remove Curb Ramp, Complete
Total of 1 st quantity range of Schedule C
Total of 2nd quantity range of Schedule C
Total of 3m Quant~v range of Schedule C
Adjusted Total of Schedule C = Average of above three totals x 0.06
Total of Three Scheduels
1..Q..!
1
3
.J!....t
1
3
1.!.-=.
1
4
1..Q..!
1
4
1..Q..!
1
4
10+
WA
EA
~I EA
EA
EA
1~1 SY
SY
SY
~I SY
SY
SY
~I SY
SY
SY
~I SY
SY
SY
3,200.00
7,050.00
23,500.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6J8ITi
37,694.00
176.006.78
4,409.70
43,984.70
3,150.00
1;15g,9Q
1 ,Q50:¡ro
1,05000
110.00
'OOcOQ
~
3,306:00:
2,500.00
2,500.00
3,300'.00
2,500:00
2,500.00
z',z'()OcOO
2.000:00
2,000.00
3,350.00
10,170.00
31,500.00
1,150.00
3,150.00
9,450.00
110.00
300.00
1,100.00
3,300.00
10,000.00
25,000.00
3,300.00
10,000.00
25,000.00
2,200.00
8,000.00
20.000.00
15,69127
75,061.34
277 558.33
7,366.22
55,306.22
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
June 6, 2005
Land Use and Transportation Committee
David H. M~ Manager
Rick Perez, ;.E.,~~~ ~raffic Engineer r<Iß
Neighborhood Traffic Safety Program Criteria Revision
DATE:
TO:
POLICY QUESTION:
Should the City Council revise its policy on the criteria for installing traffic calming devices to reflect the
presence of schools and parks?
BACKGROUND:
Residents of SW 349111 Place near Coronado Park have petitioned unsuccessfully for traffic calming devices to
reduce speeding in their neighborhood and in the vicinity ofthe park. The currently adopted policy (Exhibit A)
provides a table of points in each of four categories based on speed, volume, number of collisions, and severity of
collisions, as shown in the table below:
Table 1: Severity Scoring Point Scale
Points AccidentslY ear Average Daily Traffic Injury Accidents Per Year 85th Percentile Speed
(5-year history) (two-way total) (5-year history) * (mph in either direction)
0.5 0.3-0.5 500-1100 0.1 26-29
1.0 0.5-0,7 1101-1700 0.2 29.1-32
1.5 0.7-0.9 1701-2300 0.3 32.1-35
2.0 0.9-1.1 2301-2900 0.4 35.1-38
2.5 1.1-1.3 2901-3500 0.5 38.1-41
3.0 More than 1.3 More than 3500 More than 0,5 More than 41
* Note: Fatal collisions will count as two injury collisions
A total of three points is necessary to qualify for traffic calming devices. Based on three counts conducted on SW
349111 Place, the highest point total achieved is 2.5 points. Therefore, residents have requested that the Council
consider revising the criteria to award additional points for the presence of schools and parks,
Staff proposes that in order to qualify for additional points, a school or park would either have to have frontage on
the street in question, or have a designated school crossing on the street. Although school crossing locations may
be subject to change as a result of school attendance boundary changes, these locations typically occur close to
schools, and are therefore less likely to change with time.
Staff investigated the findings of 69 petitions for traffic calming devices to determine the extent of effects of such
a policy revision. Two scenarios were tested: a half-point addition, or a one-point addition. Adding a half point
resulted only in two cases qualifying for the NTS program that did not currently qualify: Coronado Park, and SW
325th Place near Green Gables School. Adding one point would result in one more location qualifying for the
program: SW 327th Street near Olympic View School. It would also qualify one other neighborhood for
bypassing the balloting process: 21 5t Avenue SW near Adelaide School (note that this requires 6 points).
OPTIONS:
1. No Action
2. Add one half point to the Neighborhood Traffic Safety Program criteria for streets fronting
schools and parks and designated school crossings,
3. Add one point to the Neighborhood Traffic Safety Program criteria for streets fronting schools
and parks and designated school crossings.
Staff Recommendation:
Authorize Option 2 to add one half point to the Neighborhood Traffic Safety ])rogram c."itc.ria for streets
fronting schools and parks and designated school crossings.
Committee Recommendation:
Forward option 2 to the June 21, 2005 City Council Consent Agenda.
" " ' "" ,:' , ,', '-" "0'.' :,,' . " '", ~ ,,', ",,' "" , ,',', " "';"" : ",' ,
'AIJIJROVALOûi~~MMrrn:F. REPÒRT:";,I:;:I/':"
,,;';;j',::~:j:;:~j ,. ¡!':~¡~i;c:,:~:t,:" ," ',';; '" """""..vf:
""':"':":~,:'.:",",:'"I.,~,(¡,,,',.',",',"',,',," "",~""t""~""I""""""'" 'I' "111",,""""'" """""""""",1I"("II,¡I\i!\- lI!~"""""I""
. .' , """", ' '" " ,""'" , ' """ ", "," ",:'1/;'" "
, , ,",." "':"... "-,,~,:",,"J~'ck' ',',U"t"W",~,,-,,'~:,~.':'ßh',a,,',',:ïr., ...,:,',".'"",':,:.'~, "'" ' ,:,'" '::::::'?'Mic¡'~~I:PiirP"~~m~ii~iil:;'" '" ".,,~. ',Iii~I~oØiill!:,~:é':~btt '," ,
~"'~'.:<:,¡" """, "",.', "l"~',.." ,',:"111;:,.'::,":" "':':"::~~~~:.~'l~,(~!¡;.Ùï\i,':,,:\"""""
""'J:""~,;""",~,::~':",,!,,:',,':,--',"',,..,."','" ,"" """"""':"""f:"~"t".;""" II",,":!" """""""',1""":'"",, ""',I'"""""""""""",:, ""II"""" !'I'I""""'~"!!I')""!!,,~I~"""""~"'I'/"'"
,,- ""._~,' ' """"""ii.:.::""",~."""""..,."""""....."":,,...,,:,::'::,.::"...,.~:,,::,-"';;:"':' ""","",",," "I,",""',',.';'",.."
k\lutc\lutc memo template " ne\V.d"c
Process:
~
CITY OF ~
Federa.1 Way
TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICE INSTALLATION/REMOVAL
CRITERIA
Traffic Calminl! Installation Criteria
Neighborhood traffic calming devices may include speed humps, traffic circles, chicanes, or other
devices requested by neighborhood residents and approved by City Council. These devices shall only be
installed when all of the following criteria are met:
General Conditions:
1.
Less restrictive means of controlling speeding have been attempted without success (i.e. radar
reader board, special enforcement, speed watch, signing, etc,).
2,
The proposed devices shall only be installed on residential streets functionally classified as local or
minor collector, except that devices that do not delay emergency vehicles such as speed tables or
roundabouts may be permitted on principal collectors with posted sPeeds of 25 mph.
3.
The proposed devices shall only be installed on streets which have no more than two lanes, or
where the overall pavement width is not greater than 40 feet.
4.
The proposed devices shall only be installed on streets where legal posted speed limit does not
exceed 25 MPH.
5.
No devices shall be installed within 600 feet of a traffic signal or 250 feet of a stop sign.
6.
No devices shall be installed at locations which have less than the minimum safe stopping sight
distance which is 150 feet at 25 MPH.
7.
No adverse street characteristics exist, such as steep grades in excess of 8% or severe horizontal or
vertical curves.
8.
Storm drainage problems created by the installation of the proposed devices can be adequately
addressed.
9.
Each neighborhood may apply for traffic calming devices costing a maximum of $ 1O,000/year,
where a neighborhood is defined by the elementary school attendance area. If the proposed
devices cost more than this amount, a neighborhood group must form a Local Improvement
District (LID) to fund the excess amount. Otherwise, the City may fund the excess amount in the
following year on a first come first serve basis,
1.
To be considered for traffic calming device installation, a petition must be submitted signed by
owners or residents representing at least ten lots or parcels within the affected area. The affected
area includes properties abutting streets within 600 feet of the proposed devices location, measured
along street centerlines and properties which the proposed devices would be located along their
sole access route as determined by the Public Works Director.
2.
The total severity score based on accident history, accident severity. average daily traffic, and 85th
percentile speed as shown on Table 1 shall be at least 3.0,
Table 1: Severity Scoring Point Scale
Points AccidentsN ear Average Daily Traffic Injury Accidents Per Year 85th Percentile Speed
(5-year history) (two-way total) (5-year history) (mph in either direction)
0.5 0.3-0.5 500-1100 0.1 26-29
1.0 0.5-0.7 1101-1700 0.2 29.1-32
1.5 0.7-0.9 1701-2300 0.3 32.1-35
2.0 0.9-1.1 2301-2900 0.4 35.1-38
2.5 1.1-1.3 2901-3500 0,5 38.1-41
3,0 More than 1.3 More than 3500 More than 0,5 More than 41
* Note: Fatal collisions will count as two injury collisions
3.
A neighborhood meeting will be held to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various
traffic calming devices at the subject location. In addition to residents, staff ITom the City="s
Departments of Public Works and Police will be at the meeting. Police and Fire Department staff
will also be invited.
4.
lethe total severity score is at least 6.0. no balloting will occur and the proposal will be presented
to the City Council sub-committee. as described in Step 6 below. Otherwise. property owners and
residents within the affected area shall be sent by first class mail a city prepared or approved
ballot. Property owners who are also residents will receive one ballot, although if returned, will be
equivalent to two votes. Half (50%) of the returned ballots must vote affirmatively, concurring
with the installation of the proposed devices.
5,
A second neighborhood meeting will be held to deliver the balloting results,
6.
lfthe ballot measure is passed or if the total severity score is at least 6,0, the proposal is presented
to the City Council Sub-committee, and if passed, is then presented to the full Council.
7.
If approved by the City Council, the traffic calming devices will be installed as soon as weather
permits.
Traffic Calminf! Rem(Jval Criteria
Neighborhood traffic calming devices located within the City of Federal Way may be removed when all
of the following criteria are met:
1.
To be considered for traffic calming devices removal, a petition must be submitted signed by
owners or residents representing at least ten lots or parcels within the affected area, The affected
area includes properties abutting streets within 600 feet ofthe existing device location, measured
along street centerlines and properties at which the existing devices are located along their sole
access route as determined by the Public Works Director
2.
Property owners and residents within the affected area shall be sent by first class mail a city
prepared or approved ballot. Property owners who are also residents will receive one ballot,
although if returned, will be equivalent to two votes. Half (50%) of the returned ballots must vote
affirmatively, concurring with the removal of devices.
3.
An adequate review period (minimum of 12 months) and subsequent engineering analysis has
been performed to determine the traffic characteristics along the route and the impacts to the
remaining street system.
K:\TRAFFIC\NTS\NTSCRlT DRAFT REV 'O2-DOC
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
June 6, 2005
Land Use and Transportation Committee
David H. M~anager
Rick Perez, P,E,,~ty ~raffic Engineer r«P
Commercial Vehicles On-Street Parking in Residential Zones
POLICY QUESTION:
Should on-street parking of commercial vehicles be further restricted in residential zones?
BACKGROUND:
Federal Way City Code Section 15-82, as last amended in 1991, reads:
"No person shall park a commercial vehicle which is more than 80 inches wide overall on any street or alley in
residential areas zoned SE, RS and RM between the hours of 12:00 midnight and 6:00 a.m."
In 2004, Ordinance 04.457 also amended Sections 22-1176 through 22-1180 to restrict the ability to park commercial
vehicles off-street in residential zones. Staff anticipated that parking of commercial vehicles might shift to public right-
of-way as a result.
At the January 10, 2005 Land Use and Transportation Committee meeting, four citizens spoke in favor of further
restrictions for parking commercial vehicles in residential zones. The concerns presented included:
1.
2.
3.
Larger vehicles create safety issues, including sight distance restrictions at driveways and ability of
emergency vehicles to turn around in cul-de-sacs;
The current restrictions require vehicles to be moved by midnight and the resultant noise disturbs the
neighborhood;
Enforcement of the existing code is lacking.
At the January 24, 2005 Land Use and Transportation Committee meeting, the Committee requested staff to compare
our ordinance with other cities and provide a recommendation. Attachment A provides a summary of the comparison
of codes.
At the March 7, 2005 Land Use and Transportation Committee meeting, the Committee requested staff to investigate
the extent of streets on which on-street parking would be permitted under the proposed ordinance, and investigate the
extent to which the codes, covenants, and restrictions (CC&R's) of individual residential developments would already
provide such a restriction.
At the March 21, 2005 Land Use and Transportation Committee meeting, staff presented findings that approximately 3
miles of streets would remain where commercial vehicles could be parked on-street without restrictions, It was also
determined that it would be impractical to determine the extent of enforceable covenants in individual plats. The
Committee forwarded the issue to City Council with no recommendation,
At the AprilS, 2005 City Council meeting, the Council remanded the issue back to the Land Use and Transportation
Committee, requesting more information on the City's previous extent of enforcement actions and the experience of
other cities in enforcing similar ordinances.
Public Safety staff provided attachment B that shows the number of enforcement actions under the current ordinance,
as summarized below:
il"
.-........,
, car Ul)er 10 Il.lons ,_J
~~, ',,-, ' " , -...
1998 1
1999 14
2000 30
2001 16
2002 6
2003 36
2004 4
2005 to date 6
y
NlI I
of V' I '"
This list does not reflect warnings, CAD records, or contacts officers may have had to address commercial
vehicles parked in violation of the ordinance.
Police Department efforts to address commercial vehicle violations of the ordinance have been initiated on a
complaint basis, Following a complaint, directed or extra patrol would occur to address/solve the problem,
Education, warnings, and enforcement are options we have utilized to solve problems. Officers have taken action
based on on-view violations as well.
The City's efforts are generally consistent with other South King County agencies. Some dedicate Traffic Unit
personnel for commercial vehicle enforcement and complaints. Most complaints regarding ordinance violations
between the hours of midnight and 6:00 a.m. are addressed by patrol personnel.
As staff is made aware of concerns from citizens regarding commercial vehicles being present in residential areas
in violation of the ordinance, we will continue to assign commissioned personnel to solve these problems.
OPTIONS:
r':'"
, :
, '
,,::';ij~:Ρ~¡l;::r:"'"
..,~"'..,.....,..""
,,', """;: ",' :' """""'1'1':,'"",,," :;"l~"""þ':"~;:'~'.
, " 1,;1 ,",'" """"", """'II ,Ii!".
I ",'I!!L.:Lc.::'1 I:'!:~i:~.'f¡~":'",
, I:::, .'1:' )M~~!~~~;¡¡;~!::r::~:
1. Eliminate on-street .
parking of commercial .
vehicles III residential .
zones, with exceptions
for delivery vehicles .
2. Further restrict hours .
for on+street parking of .
commercial vehicles in .
residential zones
.
Reduces potential safety issues;
Improves emergency vehicle access;
Reduces late night noise in
neighborhoods;
Reduces diesel
neighborhoods
. Potential impacts to home-based
business owners/operators that
utilize commercial vehicles.
fumes
in
Reduces potential safety issues;
Improves emergency vehicle access;
Reduces late night noise in
neighborhoods;
Reduces diesel
neighborhoods
. Potential impacts to home-based
business owners/operators that
utilize commercial vehicles.
fumes
in
3. No action
.
No impact
.
Could be perceived as
umesponsive to citizen concerns
regarding:
0 Potential traffic safety issues;
0 Emergency vehicle access;
0 Noise and diesel fumes in
neighborhood
Staff Recommendation:
Per the direction of the Chair of the Committee, as this issue is a policy decision, staff is not making a recommendation.
Options are:
1. Prohibit on-street parking of commercial vehicles in residential zones.
2. Increase the hours of restriction for on-street parking of commercial vehicles in residential zones.
3. No action,
Committee Recommendation:
Forward the Committee recommendation to the June 21, 2005 City Council Business Agenda for 1'1 Reading of the
ordinance.
APPRO\' AI. 011 COMMlTTEE,IU:PORT:
" ' :,~.l.'"
',>.; :'
:",
,,'. '
.. ,c' ..
" "
:".','J/"
",f,r!\"!',','"
" '~',,'
. '-....",
MichaclPårl4'iM~mbcr ..','
,"
,:..
",'1"...:,.." ,
..,..'"
, 7"
,,",
.., ,
, , " , """"""'---~
.Iuck J)f)vcy, Chair'
,..1 ._.---:...;.........., """'.".-"" ,
Etlc Faison, Member
"
..., ",,' ,-
'""." ,
.' "
,"...
'-...., ,... ", " ."
, ,
K:\LUrC\200S\Ob..O6,,(,5 COM,MFRCIAL VElllCLES ON"STREEI' I'ARi<lNGj)OC;
AT"TACHMENT A
Agen(~y I .~~~dmme '(~i:Jl ,J\tþçhpd ,:1," "",', Sizc LHnits:,;!: :::"
Vehiclcs." .' Ct.m:in1el"bial :'::;Wid'i¡~~r~LtJTI,glh ] .oad ,'" ..-.
," ,." ;i¡,,~td"" «ft.;ef>'::. ' (fet:D... . ,(I?~~lln~ i$) \'
i, letS":::,,
...-- --'-'. - ',.".
Auburn 1 hour max 1 hourmax 7.5 20 No limit
Operating Operating
Bellevue prohibited prohibited 8 30 32,000
10:00 pm - 10:00 pm -
7:00 am 7:00 am
Des 6 hours max 6 hours max 7.5 20 10,000
Moines
Everett Allowed Loading only 8 20 16,000
Kent 2 hours max 2 hours max 8 20 8,000
Puyallup Loading only Loading only 7 No No limit
limit
Over 1 ton
Renton prohibited Prohibited No No 12,000
9:00 pm - limit limit
6:00 am
Tacoma I hour max 1 hour max No No 12,000
limit limit
King Prohibited Prohibited No
Midnight - Midnight - 6.67 No limit
County 6:00 am 6:00 am limit
Current Prohibited Prohibited
Federal Midnight - Midnight - 6.67 No No limit
Way limit
Code 6:00 am 6:00 am
Commercial Vehicle Parking Tickets Issued 1/1/97-5/25/05
Violation Date
1998
10/22/98 23:10
1999
3/24/99 1 :00
2/18/99 2:30
7/18/99 4:20
10/15/99 2:20
10/15/99 2:00
8/22/99 0:13
10/15/99 4:05
10/15/99 5:20
10/15/99 2:40
4/13/99 14:00
10/20/99 0:27
10/15/99 0:45
10/15/99 0:30
10/15/99 0:40
2000
3/8/00 7:43
10/18/00 1:05
7/7/00 5:17
2/12/00 4:55
6/13/00 4:20
2/12/00 4:50
2/12/00 4:47
2/12/00 4:40
6/28/00 0:20
3/28/00 1 :25
8/2/00 1: 14
6/29/00 3:35
6/9/00 1 :15
5/23/00 0:30
3/21/00 1 :05
8/24/00 2:34
8/24/00 2:45
6/21/00 0:30
8/24/00 2:10
6/28/00 1 :09
6/9/00 1 :27
6/26/00 0:36
1/1/00 0:01
5/23/00 0:25
8/2/00 1 :06
11/4/00 5:30
11/23/00 5:20
11/23/00 5:25
5/20/00 4:00
8/21/00 0:25
Address
ParkinQ Offense
1 AV 5363 5T
15,80,2
Year Total: 1
1200 5W 346 15.80.2
1200 5W 360 5T 15,80,2
1308 SW 314TH 15.80.2
18 S E OF 8R99 15.80.2
29400 BLK OF 21PL 8 15.80.2
341001 PL 8 15,80.2
3AV 8W / SW356 15.80.2
5008320 15.80.2
6 SW/ SW305 15.80.2
600 SW 356 8T 15,80.2
S 296/21 AV 8 15,80,2
SW 340 /1 WY 8 15.80,2
SW 340 W OF 1 ST 15.80.2
SW340 W OF 18T S 15,80,2
Year Total: 14
1000 S 340 8T
1700 281 PL S
1700 S 330
1700 SW 330 8T
1800 S 330
1800 5 330 8T
1900 S 330 ST
1900 SW 330 ST
200 8 328
200 S 342 PL
2000 S 342 PL
2100 S 296
2100 8296ST
2100 S 341 PL
2100 S 342PL
2200 8 330
2200 8 330
23400 20A V 8
2500 S 342PL
29600 8T S 20 AVE
29800 18AV 8
30 S 342 PL
3310038 AV SW
33800 1 PL S
340001 CIRCLE 8
3507 SW 339TH PL
3800 SW 342 ST
3900 8W 342 ST
LEXINGTON TOWN8 19PL
5 34000 S 342 PL
15,80.2
15.80,2
15,80,2
15,80,2
15,80.2
15,80,2
15.80,2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15,80.2
15,80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80,2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80,2
15.80.2
15,80,2
15.80,2
15.80,2
15.80,2
Year Total: 30
2001
1/24/01 12:44
12/12/01 1:45
1/23/01 0:00
2/20/01 0:40
9/27/01 1:25
7/22/01 3:20
7/22/01 3:28
1/17/01 1:00
12/31/01 0:20
3/22/01 2:15
3/22/01 2:28 '
3/20/01 8:15
1/24/01 1 :30
4/4/01 1:15
4/4/01 1 :00
1/18/01 1:00
2002
11/27/02 1:14
12m02 1:40
12/20/02 1:52
4/24/02 2:21
6/13/02 0:50
2/9/02 1:35
2003
9/19/03 0:01
9/25/03 0:54
5/1/03 0:25
3/13/03 5:05
3/13/03 4:45
9/26/03 0:41
10/1/03 0:47
10/18/03 0:10
3/13/03 5: 1 0
10/1/03 0:53
10/1/03 0:50
11/15/03 0:56
10/1/03 0:30
8/22/03 0:02
4/8/03 2:55
4/8/03 3:00
9/25/03 0:21
3/13/03 4:20
9/19/03 0: 1 0
3/13/03 4:10
8/14/03 0:07
3/13/03 4:25
3/13/03 4:30
11/10/03 23:45
9/12/03 0:37
3/3/03 3:00
8/21/03 0:53
9/12/03 1:00
3/3/03 1 :00
1100 S 322 PL 15.80.2
1200 SW 325 PL 15.80.2
1700 283 ST 15.80.2
200 S 328 ST 15.80.2
2100 SW 296 ST 15.80.2
2400 S STAR LAKE RD 15.80.2
2400 S STAR LAKE RD 15.80.2
2900018 AV S 15.80.2
2940021 AV S 15.80.2
316063 PL SW 15.80.2
317003 PL SW 15.80.2
31800 3RD PL SW 15.80.2
3440035 PL SW 15.80.2
3550025 AV SW 15.80.2
600 SW 352 ST 15.80.2
700 SW CAMPUS DR 15.80.2
Year Total: 16
1100 S 299 PL
2300 SW 333 PL
2950021 PL S
'3270020 WAY S
34600 27 A V SW
600 S 302 ST
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
Year Total: 6
306002 AV S
1400 S 303 ST
1900 S 327 LN
2122 SW 352 ST
2132 SW 316 ST
2400 S STAR LAKE RD
2500 S STAR LAKE RD
2500 $ STAR LAKE RD
2500 SW 352 ST
25000 S STAR LAKE RD
27300 STAR LAKE RD
27500 STAR LAKE RD
28400 18 PL S
28500 18 AV S
29500 21 PL S
2950021 PL S
30200 25 PL S
30300 6 A V SW
30400 1 PL S
304003 AV S'
30600 1 PL SW
30800 16 AV SW
30800 16 AVE SW
3171132AVSW
323005 AV S
32500 7 PL S
32700 19 PL S
32800 S 330 PL
32858 9 PL S
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80,2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15,80,2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
15.80.2
2003 continued
3/28/03 4:39 32905 19 PL 5 15.80.2
9/12/03 0:53 33000 328 PL S 15.80.2
3/13/03 5:25 345008 AV SW 15,80.2
9/20/03 0:27 35700 1 AV 5 15.80.2
4/9/03 1:10 520 5 323 PL 15.80.2
3/13/03 3:50 714 S 325 5T 15.80.2
10/2/03 0:53 82505 AV S 15.80,2
Year Total: 36
2004
2/16/04 4:00 25005311 5T 15.80.2
2/16/04 3:25 2840018 AV 5 15,80.2
2/16/04 3:25 2840018 AV 5 15.80.2
3/18/04 2:22 32650 9 PL 5 15.80.2
Year Total: 4
2005
1/19/05 2: 11 1800 S 369 5T 15.80.2
2/4/05 0:15 32900 3 A V 5W 15.80.2
2/11/05 0:14 330030 AV 5W 15,80.2
4/29/05 2:42 33221 37 AV 5W 15.80.2
2/5/05 0:58 3330330 AV SW 15.80.2
2/3/05 2:57 3605 5W 330 5T 15,80.2
Year Total: 6
1/1/97~5/25/05 Total: 113
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
June 6, 2005
Land Use and Transportation Committee
David H. , Manager
Rick Perez, P.E. ity Traffic Engineer rrr:
Setting Public earingfor 2006-2011 Transportation Improvement Plan
DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
POLlCY QUESTION:
Should City Council set a Public Hearing for adoption of the Transportation Improvement Plan on July 191\ 2005?
BACKGROUND:
In accordance with the requirements of Chapters 35.77 and 47.26 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), the
City of Federal Way adopted its original Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) and Arterial Street Improvement
Plan (ASIP) on July 23, 1991. The City is also required to adopt a revised TIP and ASIP on an annual basis to
reflect the City's current and future street and arterial needs.
The City is required to hold a minimum of one public hearing on the revised plans. Staff proposes that this occur
at the July 19,2005 City Council meeting. Once the revised plans have been adopted by Resolution, a copy of the
respective plans must be filed with the Washington State Secretary of Transportation and the Washington State
Transportation Improvement Board. The attached Resolution sets the public hearing date for the July 19,2005
City Council meeting. The TIP will be presented to the Land Use and Transportation Committee on June 20,
2005.
OPTIONS:
I, Set Public Hearing for adoption of the Transportation Improvement Plan on July 19th, 2005.
2. Set Public Hearing on an alternative date recommended by the committee,
Staff Recommendation:
Authorize Option 1 to set the PubUc Hearing date for adoption of the Transportation Improvement Plan for
July 19, 2005.
Committee Recommendation:
Forward Option 1 to the .June 21, 2005 City Council Consent Agenda.
"AllpI{OV AI. Of<' COMMITTEF. RF.PORT:
, .
"" ."" """"""_.".."._"--"_.,,-,,,,..,,.__. ",,--
""" "" "."""'.-..--"".
" F:."ic "I¡;ãisöñ;ï~iëilibèr ... ,,"""'"
I,..".
.Jack novey, Cbah"
Michael Park, Member
.."--. ..." "" '" ."
, " "v-
.-...-,..." .
--"..1,
i{',<)'Tí"";",,C',,"6..06,,()5 snT'ïl\)(j TH'HE:\RI.NG J),\TE"DO('
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, SETTING A PUBLIC
HEARING DATE OF TUESDAY, JULY 19, 2005 FOR
ADOPTION OF A REVISED SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND ARTERIAL STREET
IMPROVEMENT PLAN.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Chapters 35.77.0 I 0 and 47.26.170 of the RCW,
the City Council of the City of Federal Way must adopt a revised and extended six-year
Transportation Improvement Program ('TIP") and Arterial Street Improvement Plan ("A SIP")
annually; and
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way's SEPA Responsible Official reviewed the TIP and
ASIP under the State Environmental Policy Act, RCW 43.21 C, and issued a Detennination of
Nonsignificance on August 21, 2004, and an addendum on
,2005; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing must be held prior to the adoption ofthe revised and extended
Six-year Transportation Improvement Program and Arterial Street Improvement Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Public Hearing. A public hearing shall be held on the 2006-2011 Federal Way
Transportation Improvement Plan and Arterial Street Improvement Plan at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday,
July 19,2005, at the Federal Way City Hall Council Chambers.
Res. #
, Page 1
Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase ofthis resolution should be
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause or phrase of this resolution.
Section 3. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of
the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 4. Effective Date, This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the
Federal Way City Council.
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON this
day of
,2005.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, DEAN McCOLGAN
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.:
Revised: 5/25/05
Res. #
, Page 2