The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Comm PKT 06-15-2005 June 15,2005 7:00 p.rn. City of Federal Way PLANNING COMMISSION City Hall Council Chambers AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4. AUDIENCE COMMENT 5. ADMINISTRA TNE REPORT 6. COMMISSION BUSINESS . PUBLIC HEARING,... continued Freeway Profile Signs Code Amendment 7. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS 8. AUDIENCE COMMENT 9. ADJOURN Commissioners John Caulfield. Chair Dini Duclo$ William Drake Lawson Bronson Tony Moore (Alternate #2) Hope Elder, Vice-Chair Dave Osaki Merle Pfeifer Christine Nelson (Alternate #1) Pam Duncan-Pierce (Alternate #3) City Staff Kathy McClung, CDS Director Margaret Clark, Senior Planner E. Tina Piety, Administrative Assistant 253-835-2601 .!Y H' J);:,.£i 0!.9JIç,dl!J:JJ.lwgy~mm K;IPlanning Commission\2005\Agenda 06-15-05.<1oc CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PLANNING COMMISSION May 18, 2005 ~.m. City Hall Council Chambers MEETING MINUTES Commissioners present: John Caulfield, Hope Elder, Dave Osaki, Dini Duclos, Bill Drake, Merle Pfeifer, and Lawson Bronson. Commissioners absent: none. Alternate Commissioners present: Tony Moore. Alternate Commissioners absent: Christine Nelson (unexcused) and Pam Duncan-Pierce (excused). Staff present: Senior Planner Margaret Clark, Assistant City Attorney Amy Jo Pearsall, Consultant Janet Shull, and Administrative Assistant E. Tina Piety. Chair Caulfield called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ÁPPROV AL OF MINUTES It was m/s/c to adopt the April 20, 2005, minutes as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENT None ÁDMINISTRA TIVE REpORT Ms. Clark informed the Commission that staff continues to follow-up on issues raised at the Apri120, 2005, public hearing. A letter (a copy was handed out to Commissioners) has been sent to property and business owners informing them of the proposed changes and inviting them to a meeting with staff on June 1,2005. Because the meeting with property and business owners has been scheduled on June 1 S\ the public hearing will be continued to June 15,2005, and the Commission will not meet June 1 st. COMMISSION BUSINESS WORKSHOP - Neighborhood Business (BN) Zone Code Amendments Ms. Shull delivered the staff report. The Commission decided to open the meeting to public testimony. Brian Lawler - He is the lawyer for the Irmas Charitable Foundation, which has property throughout the West. They have property on 21 st Avenue SW near SW 356th Street and have been attempting for years to sell or lease the property. The only interest they have had is from a self-storage firm. Mr. Lawler provided the Commission with a picture of the site and pictures of "attractive" mini-storage sites. He feels the pictures show that self-storage can fit nicely into a neighborhood setting. Such a storage site can serve a local area; otherwise people must go to Pacific Highway South. He would like the Commission to add self service storage facilities to the BN zone uses. Bob Anderson - He is with the Bonney-Watson Funeral Home. Recently, more and more people are choosing cremation. Many times the ashes are scattered. Because of this, the family and mends have no grave site to visit. It is for this reason Bonney-Watson wants to create a memorial garden. He gave KIPlanning Commission12005lMecting Summary 05.lg.05.doc Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 May 18, 2005 Commissioners artist's renderings of their idea. This would be a park.like setting that will provide mourners a quiet oasis. He would like the Commission to add funeral homes to the BN zone uses. Linda Peterson - Owner of Pat's Plumbing. She runs a dispatch office where the trucks are out in the field all day. She feels it is congenial with the neighborhood. She would like the Commission to add dispatch offices to the BN zone uses. Self Service Storage Facility The Commission feels it is acceptable to add self service storage facilities to the uses in the BN zone, as long as they meet a condition that the facility is neighborhood friendly. They are concerned with the staff's proposed size of 40,000 square feet and 500 square feet per storage unit. This would give the facility about 80 units and the Commission requested staff to research whether this is economically feasible or not. They agree with allowing a resident manager, but feel this should not be a requirement. The Commission discussed fencing and that barbed wire is not allowed unless a fence is over six feet and then only if a variance is given. Staff was asked to research and provide additional information about design guidelines for fences. The Commission discussed the staff's options: 1) that self service storage facilities should be part of a mixed use development; or 2) that self service storage facilities should be designed to not look like a self service storage facility. The Commission felt that self service storage facilities should not be required to be part of a mixed use development, but this option should be allowed. Discussion was held on holding "garage sales" at the self service storage facility. The staff s proposal is the garage sales would not be allowed. The Commission feels it should be up to the self serVice storage facility management. Staff will research how this issue is handled elsewhere. The Commission agrees with the other staff proposed regulations that no storage unit is to front on adjacent streets and no door openings are to face residential zoned property. It was suggested that a minimum acreage size be included so that smaller BN areas are not completely taken over by a self service storage facility. The Commission held a discussion regarding Neighborhood Business (BN) and Community Business (Be) zones. It seems to them that some areas that are zoned BN are really just servicing the neighborhood, but than, they are truly servicing the whole community either. It was suggested that another zone is needed that would fit between the BN and BC zones. There was also discussion about the size of grocery stores and how they are getting bigger. Ms. Clark commented that these are issues the Commission may want to add to next year's work program. Funeral Homes The Commission agreed that it makes sense to add funeral homes to the allowed uses in the BN zone. Residential on the Ground Floor of Mixed-Use Development The Commission agreed that it makes sense to increase flexibility by allowing residential on the ground floor of mixed-use development. There was concern that a development could start with residential and have just a vague idea of the commercial uses. The Commission feels the developer should have viable commercial uses in mind and agrees with the staffs proposal to state in the requirements that the commercial uses are to be from the retail/office use zone chart or the entertainment use zone chart. The Commission feels that staff should consider allowing live/work units. Retail Uses Selling Signs with Accessory Manufacturing of Signs On-Site The Commission agreed that it .makes sense to add retail uses selling signs with accessory manufacturing of signs on-site to the allowed uses in the BN zone. Dispatch Offices The Commission agreed that due to nature of the business, it does not make sense to add dispatch offices to the allowed uses in the BN zone. This request had come from Pat's Plumbing, which is currently nonconforming and would like to be conforming so that they may make tenant improvements, but has unique circumstances. The K;IPlanning Commission12005\Meeting Summary 05-18.05.doc Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 May 18, 2005 Commission recognizes the uniqueness of the location of this particular business. It is located in a residential zone, but is next to the freeway and therefore very noisy and no one would want to live there. While it might make sense to rezone the area to BN, dispatch offices are not a compatible BN use, so it does not make sense to add them to the BN uses. There is no zone that dispatch offices would be allowed in that staff, and or the City Council, would consider rezoning the area (given that the surrounding uses are residential). The Commission commented that if the City were to allow Conditional Uses that would resolve the issue. Ms. Clark suggested the Commission consider requesting that Conditional Uses be added to their next work program. Require Commercial Development to Front on Public Streets The Commission felt it does not make sense to require that commercial development front on public streets, but would like the staff to help them understand what such development would look like and what are the development standards for BN. The Commission would like a workshop on design standards. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS The City has received a shoreline grant to update the Shoreline Master Program. AUDIENCE COMMENT None ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. KIPlanning Commission\2005\Meeting Summary 05. I 8.05.doc ~ CITY OF. . -::0;- Federa I Way June 9, 2005 To: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM John Caulfield, Chair, City of Federal Way Planning Commission Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services Margaret H. Clark, AlCP, Senior Planner Betty Cruz, Code Compliance Officer Follow-up to April 20, 2005, Planning Commission Public Hearing on Freeway Profile Signs MEETING DATE: June 15,2005 I. BACKGROUND This is a follow-up to the April 20, 2005, Planning Commission public hearing during which the Planning Commission discussed the staff recommendation and proposed code language for adoption of a new Freeway Profile Category Sign. After the Planning Commission discussion, the Planning Commission requested that staff follow up on and report back on the following: 1. Consider allowing electronic signs and/or electronic changeable copy and if not, provide reasons (such as safety issues or traffic-related statistics) as to why they should not be allowed. 2. Consider allowing the maximum area per sign face to be 300 square feet as opposed to 250 square feet. 3. Meet with property and business owners. 4. Check Forest Practices to be sure we can top trees when parcel is over five acres. 5. Consider tree/obstacle exemption for parcels below the freeway. 6. Give Commissioners a copy of the Power Point presentation. 7. Would any parcels in the P AA be affected? 8. Check with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) about regulations on distances between signs and size of fonts for freeway signs. 9. Which parcels would be allowed a sign? Planning Commission Memorandum 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments March 15,2005 Page 1 II. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY 2/19/05 Issuance of Determination of Non significance pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) 3/07/05 End of SEP A Comment Period 3/21/05 End of SEP A Appeal Period 4/20105 Public Hearing before the Planning Commission 6/1/05 Staff meets with affected businesses and property owners 6/15/05 Continuation of Planning Commission Public Hearing III. RESPONSE TO PLANNING COMMISSION The responses to the questions from the Planning Commission are listed below. 1. Consider allowing electronic signs and/or electronic changeable copy and if not, provide reasons (such as safety issues or traffic-related statistics) as to why they should not be allowed. Staff Response: The draft code amendment presented to the Planning Commission on April 20, 2005, included language prohibiting animated or moving signs, electronic changeable copy, and changeable copy signs. These are defined as follows: (3) Animated or moving sign means any sign that uses movement, by either natura,1 or meehanieal means, or change ofligfltiRg, eitfier RaMal or artifieial, to de]3iet 6etioR to Ðfeate a SfJeeial effeet or seeRe. or the appearance of movement of a si~ display through the use of patterns oflights. changes in color or light intensity. computerized special effects. video display. or through anv other method chasing or scintillating lights. fluttering or moving lights. lights with stroboscopic effect. or containing elements creating sound or smell: except for the scrolling of a static message. scene or color onto or off a sign board in one direction per message. 1 (24) Electronic changeable message sign means an electronically activated sign whose message content, either whole or in part, may be changed by means of electronic programming. (16) Changeable copy sign means a sign whose informational content can be changed or altered (without changing or altering the sign frame, sign supports or electrical parts) by manual or electric, electro-mechanical, or electronic means. A sign on which the message changes more than eight times a day shall be considered an electronic changeable message sign and not a changeable copy sign for purposes of this chapter. A sign on which the changing is an electronic or mechanical indication of time and/or temperature shall be considered a "time and temperature" sign and not a changeable copy sign.2 1 Amendments to the definition of "Animated or Moving Sign" are being proposed as part of the Freeway Profile Sign Code Amendment. 2 Time and temperature sign means any sign that displays the current time and temperature, without any commercial message. Planning Commission Memorandum 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments March 15,2005 Page 2 The staff rationale for not allowing animated or moving and electronic changeable copy signs was based on safety reasons since these signs can be distracting to passing motorists. The reason for not allowing changeable copy signs was due to the nature of the signs and the need to include a variety of information, resulting in a font that may be too small to be easily readable by a passing motorist, and therefore, being a safety issue. The Highway Advertising Control Act (Chapter 468-66 WAC) applies to I~5; however, because 1-5 is within the boundaries of an incorporated City, the portion ofthe the Scenic Vistas Act (Chapter 47.4~ RCW) that apply to scenic systems do not apply to 1-5. WAC 468w66-030 states the following: WAC 468-66-030. General provisions. Notwithstanding any other provision of the act or these regulations, no signs visible from the main-traveled way of the interstate system, primary system, or scenic system which have any of the following characteristics shall be erected or maintained: (7) Signs which contain, include, or are illuminated by any flashing, intermittent, or moving light or lights (except those signs giving public service infonnation). (9) Signs which move or have any animated or moving parts (except revolving signs giving public service information). (12) Electronic signs may be used only to advertise activities conducted or goods and services available on the property on which the signs are located or to present public service information. (a) Advertising messages may contain words, phrases, sentences, symbols, trade- marks, and logos. A single message or a segment of a message must have a display time of at least two seconds including the time to move onto the sign board, with all segments of the total message to be displayed within ten seconds. A message consisting of only one segment may remain on the sign board as long as desired. (b) Electronic signs requiring more than four seconds to change from one single message display to another shall be turned off during the change interval. (c) Displays traveling horizontally across the sign board must move between sixteen and thirty-two light columns per second. Displays can scroll onto the sign board but must hold for two seconds including scrolling. (d) Sign displays shall not include any art animations or graphics that portray motion, except for movement of graphics onto or off of the sign board as previously described. Based on the above, WAC 468-66-030 clearly prohibits animated signs. In addition, WSDOT has stated in a June 19, 2002, letter that the collision rate is higher by 360 percent for the section ofthe northbound Interstate 5 where the Fife animated sign is visible, compared to a section just to the north where the sign is not visible (Exhibit A). However, WSDOT does allow electronic changeable message signs and changeable copy signs. 2. Consider allowing the maximum area per sign face to be 300 square feet as opposed to 250 square feet. Planning Commission Memorandum 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments March 15,2005 Page 3 Staff Response: Staff reviewed sign codes for the six cities shown in the following table and found that the maximum area per sign face ranged from 100 square feet in the City of Olympia to 300 feet for the City of Bellingham. Billboards are normally 300 square foot area per sign face. In addition, WAC 468-66, Highway Advertising Control Act, limits Type 3 (on-premise) signs to 150 square feet per sign face and 20 feet in any dimension if they are located more than 50 feet from the advertised activity. In general, for purposes of measuring the 50-foot distance, advertised activity may be considered the common parking lot for a shopping center. Cities Sign Matrix Municipality Max Areal Face Max Height Freeway Orientation Requirement City of Arlington 250 square feet 45' Fronting freeway City of Auburn 200 square feet 45' N/A City of Bellingham 300 square feet 20' Freeway orientation requirement (Industrial Zones Only) above freeway City of Bellingham 250 square feet 20' Freeway orientation requirement (Commercial Zones Only) above freeway City of Bellingham 275 square feet 20' Freeway orientation requirement (Planned Use & Industrial Zones) above freeway City of Burlington 200 square feet 50' Freeway orientation & 500 from freeway City of Fife 250 square feet 40' Freeway orientation requirement City of Olympia 100 square feet 25' Adjacent to freeway 3. Meet with property and business owners. Staff Response: All property owners and business owners (Exhibit B) potentially affected by the proposed code amendment (please see Exhibit C - Map of Subject Properties) were provided with a transmittal letter explaining the proposed code amendment and invited to a meeting on June 1, 2004 (Exhibit D). Sign contractors were provided a copy ofthe draft code amendment and were asked for their input (Exhibit E). They were all notified that the Planning Commission public hearing was continued to June 15,2005, at which time they could also provide input. Four people attended the June 1 st meeting-Claudia Mizukami and another gentleman representing Fast Signs, a sign manufacturing business; Jeff Oliphant, representing Federal Way Market Place (the new WalMart); and Michael Mann with the Peninsula Group, representing the Super 8 Motel. The four attendees provided the following comments: (1) Concerns were expressed about whether trees on state property could be trimmed to allow visibility of signs. Planning Commission Memorandum 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments March 15,2005 Page 4 Staff Response: Staff checked with Pat O'Leary from WSDOT and was told that the state does not presently have a policy for tree trimming; however, they are working on a policy. It is presently prohibited to remove vegetation or other natural features located within the state highway right-of.way that may act as visual obstructions (WAC 468-66-010[27]). (2) One person wanted to be sure that more than one business name could be placed on a sign. Staff Response: As can be seen from Exhibit C, there are a number of properties meeting the definition of "subject property": "Subject property means the entire lot or parcel, or series oflots or parcels, on which a development, activity or use is or will locate or on which any activity or condition regulated by or subject to this chapter is or will occur or take place." Developed sites with more than one business meeting the definition of "subject property" include: (d) Gateway Center (e) BP Mini-martlFederal Way CenterlLa Quinta (f) Office Depot/G.!. Joe/Costco/Olive GardenlPopeye's (g) Home Depot/Video Only A decision as to whether more than one business name could be placed on the sign would have to be agreed upon by the owner of the sign and the other businesses that are considered part of the subject property. In addition, the available space on the sign (total square footage of the sign face) and the sign font used would playa part in determining how much information could be displayed on the sign. (3) Would a changeable time and temperature sign be allowed? Staff Response: Time and temperature sign means any sign that displays the current time and temperature, without any commercial message. A time and temperature sign can be changed either by electronic or mechanical means. Time and temperature signs are not considered to be a changeable copy sign and may be included with any sign without being included for purposes of calculating maximum sign area or maximum number of signs. (4) There was a question about font size. Staff Response: Based on input from contractors, staff is proposing a minimum font size of two feet, but no maximum font size. We could find no specific guidance ftom the state except for the definition of "legible" and "visible" as follows: WAC 468-66(11) defines "legible" as capable of being read without visual aid by a person of normal visual acuity. Planning Commission Memorandum 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments March 15,2005 Page 5 WAC 468-66(21) defines "visible" as capable of being seen (whether or not legible) without visual aid by a person of normal visual acuity. (5) There was a concern that WSDOT has landscaped areas that can both distance and block the sign from the freeway. . Staff Response: . The state does have treed areas set aside as beautification strips and as mentioneq above, staff checked with Pat O'Leary from WSDOT and was told that the state does not presently have a policy for tree trimming; however, they are working on a policy. It is presently prohibited to remove vege~ation or other natural features located within the state highway right-of-way that may act as visual obstructions (WAC 468-66-010[27]). (6) The Federal Way Market Place (new WalMart site) is unique. Due to state landscape area and hill, any sign fitting the proposed changes would not be seen from the freeway. Staff Response: Since the June 1 st meeting, staff has been working with Jeff Oliphant, the owner of the Federal Way Market Place, to determine where a freeway profile sign could be placed on the site and be visible from the freeway. This property has unique characteristics since there is a state beautification strip, located on a hill, between the Federal Way Market Place and 1.5. There is also a stream with a 50.foot stream buffer on either side and the developed site, once graded, would be at a lower elevation than the freeway. As a result, we have been unable to identify a suitable location for a sign that would be visible from the freeway due to existing trees on state property and the other site characteristics. (7) Does the Scenic Vistas Act affect Pacific Highway South? Staff Re:,ponse: Pacific Highway South does fall under the jurisdiction of the Scenic Vistas Act. However, this code amendment does not propose to allow freeway profile signs along Pacific Highway South. (7) Would City consider allowing changeable copy ifthe font is over two square feet? Staff Response: Planning Commission may wish to discuss this during the continuation ofthe public hearing on June 15, 200~. (8) In the situation of the Super 8 Motel, would a gravel parking lot for trucks be considered an acceptable activity under the Scenic Vistas Act? Staff Response: This question will be responded to separately after additional staff research. 4. Check Forest Practices to be sure we can top trees when parcel is over five acres. Planning Conunission Memorandum 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments March 15,2005 Page 6 Staff Response: Forest Practices relate to growing, harvesting, or processing timber, including, but not limited to, road construction and maintenance, thinning, salvage, harvesting, reforestation, brush control, and using fertilizers or pesticides. Thinning or trimming of trees along 1-5 would fall under a Class I forest practice. Class I forest practices have been determined to have no direct potential for damaging a public resource. According the Forest Practices Act, and information from the State Department of Natural Resources staff, if thinning or trimming of trees is being conducted outside of a sensitive area, no permit is required (Exhibit F). 5. Consider tree/obstacle exemption for parcels below the freeway. The draft code amendment presented to the Planning Commission proposed the following language: Sign hei~ht. A freeway profile sign shall not exceed 25 feet above the elevation of the nearest driving lane of the freeway at a point nearest to the proposed location of the sign. If the subject property has an elevation lower than the freeway. then the sign shall be no taller than 60 feet above the averalZe finished 1ZI'0und elevation measured at the midpoint of the sign base. If the subject property has an elevation that is hilZher than the nearest drivinlZ lane of the freeway. then the sign shall be no taller than 20 feet above the average finshed 1ZI'0und elevation measured at the midpoint of the sign base. However. the maximum heilZht ofthe sign can be increased to 40 feet above the averalZe [mshed ground elevation measured at the midpoint of the sign base in order to be visible above trees or other obstructions. subject to the director's approval. Staff Response: We have prepared a map of all affected properties below the freeway, looking at possible locations for freeway profile signs on each property or subject property given the existing location of trees adjacent to the freeway and determining what the height of the signs would be based on the existing draft language. This map is attached as Exhibit G. The map shows the subject parcels based on their elevation relative to the freeway. Potential sign locations are drawn as well as the freeway measuring point. Locations above the freeway are shaded green; those below are shaded purple. In addition, the approximate height of each sign is displayed in a blue call-out box. Sign heights have only been calculated for propertied below the fteeway. The maximum sign heights vary from 28 feet above grade on the vacant parcel shown as Property 14, to 68 feet on the Costco subject property (Property 12). Based on this information, additional discussion is warranted for maximum height of signs both above and below the freeway (please see discussion under 3(6) - Feßeral Way Market Place, above). 6. The Commissioners requested a copy of the Power Point presentation from the April 20, 2005, Planning Commission public hearing. Staff Response: The Power Point presentation has been provided to the Planning Commission. 7. Would any parcels in the PAA be affected? Planning Commission Memorandum 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments March 15,2005 Page 7 Staff Response: Please refer to Exhibit C. There are five parcels (Numbers 5-9) that are located within the City's Potential Annexation Area (P AA) that will be affected once they are annexed to the City. These parcels were given a pre-annexation comprehensive plan designation and zoning of Community Business (Be). For the most part, these parcels are under separate ownership, but could be developed as one subject property. 8. Check with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) about regu,lations on distances between signs and size offontsfor freeway signs. Staff Response: . Staff contacted the state; howe~er, the information provided was for directional and other WSDOT -related information along the highway and not for private commercial signs. Staff will continue to research this issue. 9. Which parcels would be allowed a sign? Staff Response: Please refer to Exhibit C, map, which shows "subject" properties. A "subject" property is allowed one additional ffeeway profile sign.. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the public hearing be continued to July 27, 2005. V. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Consistent with the provisions ofFWCC Section 22-538, the Planning Commission may take the following actions regarding the proposed code amendments: 1 Recommend to City Council adoption of the proposed code amendments as proposed; 2. Recommend to City C°u,ncil that the proposed code amendments not be adopted; Forward the proposed code amendments to City Council without a recommendation; or 3. 4. ModifY the proposed code amendments and recommend to City Council adoption of the amendment as modified. Planning Commission Memorandum 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments March 15,2005 Page 8 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G June 19,2002, Letter from Washington State Department of Trans po ration to Tulalip Tribes Planning Commision List of all Property Owners and Business Owners Potentially Affected by the Proposed Code Amendment Map of Subject Properties Letter to Property Owners and Business Owners Explaining the Proposed Code Amendment Letter to Sign Contractors Explaining the Proposed Code Amendment with List of Sign Contractors Notified Information from the State .Qepartment of Natural Resources Staff Map Showing Potential Sign Heights for Properties Located Below the Freeway 1:\2005 Code Amendments\Freeway Commercial Signs\Planning Cornrnission\061505 Report to Planning Commision.doc/06/09/2005 3:37 PM Planning Commission Memorandum 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments March 15,2005 Page 9 ~,_. -~~~"' ~~""~'~"~-'~-~~'-""-'"", þié)L~]¡;:Iréêi~~~i69,~\2~~_~,i~ 6 :.:g~9~,:__~:, ,-~-, " -,--""" ""----~"" ""--~""",, "'-'~~"" -,"'--"'- ..."---'----,,,,"--- June 19,2002 Tulalip Tribes Planning Commission Tulalip Community Development Department 6700 Totem Beach Road Marysville, W A 98271 Dear Tulalip Tribes Planning Commission: Conditional use permit application CU2002-01 is proposing to install a "115 foot tall freestanding pylon sign with a 30 x 40 foot color video display screen" west of Interstate 5 at the entrance to the new casino. The Washington State Department of Transportation is concerned with the safety ofthe Interstate 5 motorists as a result ofthe new sign. There has been a significant increase in collisions near a similar sign along 1-5 near the King/Pierce County line. Washington State Department of Transportation recommends against usage of a moving picture type sign for this reason. In fact, the Scenic Vista Act (RCW 47.42 and WAC 468-66) limits the use of video displays to on advertising only on- premise activities. The Scenic Vista Act also limits the types of movements, flashing and scrolling that can take place on electronic signs. We would like to see a traditional, static billboard sign instead of a video sign. The video sign was installed in 1997 on west side of Interstate 5 at the Pierce/King County line. Collision data was evaluated at a section of the northbound Interstate 5 where the sign is visible and section just north of the sign where the sign was no longer visible. The number of collisions was almost equal for the two sections ofthe Interstate before the sign was installed during the years 1995 and 1996. The number of collisions almost doubled for the section of the Interstate 5 where the sign is visible and after the sign became operational. The collision rate is higher by 360% from the section of the Interstate 5 where the sign is visible compared with a section just north where the sign is no longer visible during the years 1999 and 2000. While this is preliminary research on the traffic safety effects of the video sign, we will continue to monitor video signs. If a conclusive link is made between the video signs and traffic collisions we will inform video sign owners and operators about the serious traffic safety problems their signs are creating. Below is the summary of the accident data: EXHIBIT --A-- PAGE-LOF -2.- , ,,'....un--u- , . .,',..,_....~- .._~ ".. (§~r~¿[g I ¡Œ,,:: ~:~~!iI þ~r:'~~~IÖ~@ii~~~"~:,':,:'~~:~,"~", "~:: :~,~,~~,:'" '-'::~~-:,::,=::"",~":::: :" 'w ,~:_="',:,':==' ~ ~""'~~ Q~ ,~,- ..,--_u Tulalip Tribes Planning Conllnission 6/19/2002 Page 2 Sign visible Sign not visible MP 139.08 -139.40 MP 139.50 - 139.82 Prior to sign operation 12 10 1995-1996 Sign operational 22 6 1999-2000 Washington State Department of Transportation recommends against the installation of the video sign because of the mounting evidence that such signs distracts motorists from their driving tasks and increases the number of collisions. I request that the Tulalip Tribes Planning Commission consider the use of a static sign to minimize the impact to the driving public. Thank you for this opportunity to provide comments for the proposed sign. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, David McCormick, PE Region Traffic Engineer Washington State Department of Transportation (206) 440-4487 EXHIBIT --'L- PAGE---1-0F -L- WILLIAM PRUETT PATTI TRUST 31625 32ND AVE S AUBURN WA 98001 ALL AMERICAN HOMES 622 S 320TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 APPLE HOSPITALITY FIVE INC 901 E CARY ST RICHMOND VA 23219 GEORGE STEARS 6211 VIEW ST NE TACOMA WA 98422 HD DVLPMT OF MARYLAND INC PROPERTY TAX DEPT # 4703 PO BOX 105842 ATLANTA GA 30348 JIM JINGUJI 1818 S 356TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 J & Y INVESTMENTS LLC 13714 SE 75TH ST NEWCASTLE WA 98059 JEFFREY L OLIPHANT JLO WASHINGTON ENTERPRISES 5743 CORSA AVE STE 216 WESTLAKE VILLAGE CA 91362 Mailed to Following Property Owners: GATEWAY CENTER RETAIL LLC C/O ELLIS CB RICHARD 110 110TH AVE NE # 101 BELLEVUE WA 98004 WINCHESTER INVESTMENT PO BOX 6363 LYNNWOODWA 98036 RST ENTERPRISES 1851 CENTRAL PL S # 225 KENTWA 98030 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP PROPERTY TAX DEPT 061 999 LAKE DR ISSAQUAH WA 98027 DENIS L MARTEN 4294 NELSON RD SE OLALLA WA 98359 KAYO OIL AnN MARKETING PO BOX 1539 PASO ROBLES CA 93447 TASNIM SAYANI HOLIDAY INN & SUITES 32134 25TH AVE S FEDERAL WAYWA 98003 MICHAEL R MASTRO 150 RAINIER AVE S SEATTLE WA 98144 YOUNGYULNA 3906 S 322ND ST AUBURN WA 98001 THE PENINSULA GROUP LLC 7511 TERMINAL ST SW TUMWATER WA 98511 WEST CAMPUS SQUARE CO LLC 433 N CAMDEN # 725 BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210 JET CHEVROLET INC PO BOX 4986 FEDERAL WAY W A 98063 KING COUNTY 500 KC ADMIN BLDG 500 4TH AVE SEATTLE WA 98104 WSDOT PO BOX 47331 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7331 EXHIBIT --L- PAGE--LOF ~ t I:\DOCUMEN1\Freeway Profile Signs\Exhibit of Property ~ Business - Contractor Labels.doc Mailed to Following Business Owners: BUSINESS OWNER WALMART 1900 S 314TH ST FEDERAL WAYWA 98003 BUSINESS OWNER SUPER 8 MOTEL 1688 S 348 TH ST FEDERAL WAY W A 98003 BUSINESS OWNER COSTCO 35030 16TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY W A 98003 BUSINESS OWNER HOME DEPOT 1715 S 352ND ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 BUSINESS OWNER VIDEO ONLY 290 ANDOVER PARK E SEATTLE WA 98188 BUSINESS OWNER BP MINI MARKET 2535 S 320TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 BUSINESS OWNER LA QUINTA 32124 25TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 BUSINESS OWNER COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT 31910 GATEWAY CENTER BLVD FEDERAL WAYWA 98003 BUSINESS OWNER MARIE CALLENDER'S 31920 GATEWAY CENTER BLVD FEDERAL WAY W A 98003 BUSINESS OWNER OFFICE DEPOT 34950 ENCHANTED PKWY S FEDERAL WAY W A 98003 BUSINESS OWNER GI JOE'S 35020 ENCHANTED PKWY S FEDERAL WAYWA 98003 BUSINESS OWNER MATTRESS FAIR 1061 ANDOVER PARK E SEATTLE WA 98188 EXHIBIT --3- PAGE-2-0F ~ l:\DOCUMENTlFreeway Profile Signs\Exhibit of Property - Business - Contractor Labels.doc Delivered on May 18,2005 Letter hand-delivered to the following businesses in Campus Square: Olive Garden Popeye's Shari's Checkmate American General Finance 4 Comers Teriyaki & Sushi Fitness Shop Fast Sign Regency Cleaners Great Clips for Hair Letter hand-delivered to the following businesses in Gateway Center: Salon Parente Oriental Imports FedEx Kinko's Glaze Cottage Marlene's Market & Deli Cold Stone Great Harvest Bread Co. Soccer West II U-Frame It Pho Hoang Gateway Movies 8 Letter hand-delivered to the following businesses in Federal Way Center: Paracelsus Clinic Puget Sound Protection Opt-In Media Countrywide - Full Spectrum J & Y Investment, LLC RL O'Connor Paradigm Fidelity Loans EXH I B IT --i- PAGE--1:..0F -¥- I:\DOCUMEN1\Freeway Profile Signs\Exhibit of Property - Business - Contractor Labels.doc Delivered on May 19, 2005 Letter hand-delivered to the following businesses in Federal Way Center: Sheila's Café Espresso Prudential Northwest Realty Merritt Hunt's Office Ameriquest Star Telecom Emerald City The Berry Co VI Resorts Pacific Trust Lending ISC ~ Innovation Submission Corp Digital Escrow Westsound Mortgage EXHIBIT 3- PAGE-4I-°F.4- I:\DOCUMEN1\Freeway Profile Signs\Exhibit of Property - Business - Contractor Labels.doc 1,1 Park Toy. , r"~'\..~ .. !( r~~-l I '-"..... '.., :' , 'C_r_____,. --~- : 1 I' ~nter 'rnLJ__- i Plaza! =:" , -, I SeaTac Plaza !~' ¡(-- ""~ ~~:[~ljE7~:,il i !,!,,"li!,-Î'I-,-,ir,,!lti'I"~'~'" ~, ----1l,L-' '--~ 800m0n .UDT1In -~---- ~', 1--'-'----' ;i~""T""r : ,i,:Squf'" i !! 1 1 I , ! i !'-, - I ", ,. /{ ! :-j i¡j-i ! : i I !--- / on;" Bui..... , , , ----- O"~. B<1"'" ~1 1-5 & SR 18 / .. / v:F C_L- hf't~-lt'<'~ I-c City of Federal Way Subject Properti es, Potential Freeway Profile Signs City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S, PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063 (253) 835-2558 www.cityoffederalway. com 0 0.125 0.25 Miles I I I Scale: City Center Map L\ N 0 0.125 0.25 Miles I I I Scale: 1-5 and SR 18 This map is accompanied by NO warranties, and is simply a graphic representation. Subject Properties: Gatewav Center. (Parcels: 092104-9021, 0 092104-9027,092104-9031, 092104-9035,092104-9137, O92104-9185,0921~9320, 092104-9328) Ð ~:~í5~:70-0010) Ð Federal Way Center and La Ouinta Inn (Parcels 797820-0535, -0540) 0 Federal Way Park and Ride (Parcel 79782Q-O526) ø Younovul ProDertv (Parcel 092104-9318) 0 IMnchester Investments . {Parcel 092104-9310) 0 Pruett Prooertv (parcel 092104-9028) 0 All American Homes , (Parcel 092104-9139) 0 All American Homes (Parcel 092104-9316) CD = 212104-9010, 212104-9088) If\ SUDer 8 Motel ., (Parcel 212104-9078) Camcus Sauare and Castco I\ (Parcels 219260-0180, W 219260-0290,219260-0570, 219260-0590) f\ Home Deoot and Video Onlv W (ParceI282104-9008, 282104-9079) ~ Vacant Prooertv 'iii (ParceI2821O4-9124) ~ Vacant prooertv 'iii (Parœl282104-9028) ~ Jet Chevrolet 'Ii' (ParceI282104-9069) Vicinity Map -ì City Center! FEDERAL .... WAY ~\ [:ã/ SR 18 &\ !-Ii " L.'/-----V-- May 13, 2005 Property Owner Name Re: Dear: Draft Language for Freeway Profile Signs The City of Federal Way is in the process of drafting amendments to the sign code to allow for a new category of signs to be adopted for properties adjacent to I~5. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April20, 2005, and wílI be continuing this hearing on June 15,2005. We are enclosing a copy of the draft language for Freeway Profile Signs and we would like to invite you to a meeting in the City of Federal Way City Hall Council Chambers at 8:00 a.m., on June 1,2005. At that time, we will explain how the code would work, if adopted as drafted, and will answer any questions you may have. We would also like to hear any suggestions or recommendations concerning the new Freeway Profile Signs. The following summarizes how Freeway Profile Signs would work based on the existing draft: 1. Only properties abutting 1-5 and located within the City Center-Core (CC~C) and Community Business (BC) zoning districts would be eligible for an additional pylon or pole sign. 2. A pylon or pole sign must have a minimum of two poles. It may have one pole or structural support if it results in superior design; however, the City's Community Development Services Director must approve this. 3. Signs must be oriented toward 1-5, be visible from 1~5 (not the off-ramps), and be located near the property line closest to 1-5. 4. Design of the sign must be compatible to the architecture of the primary structure on the site, or to the primary sign(s) already permitted. 5. Font sizes must be a minimum of two (2) feet tall. 6. Animated or moving signs, electronic changeable copy, changeable copy, or electronic message centers will not be pemitted. n2005 Code AmendmentslFroeway Commercial SignsIPl¡¡nni"g Conunission\Lcttor to OW"",", and Businesses,doe EXHIBIT ~ PAGE-LOF --2- Page 2 May 16, 2005 7. If the sign is located on property adjacent to the freeway and the property on which the sign is to be located is below the elevation ofthe freeway, the height of the sign shall be no taller than 25 feet above the elevation of the freeway; however, the sign can be no taller than 60 feet above the average finished ground elevation measured at the midpoint of the sign base. 8. If the sign is located on property adjacent to the freeway and the property on which the sign is to be located is above the elevation of the freeway, the sign can be no taller than 20 feet above the average finished ground elevation measured at the mid-point ofthe base. However, sign height can be increased up to a maximum of 40 feet above the average finished ground elevation measured at the mid-point ofthe base in order to be visible above trees or other obstructions. Any increase in height above 20 feet is subject to the approval of the City's Community Development Services Director. 9. Maximum sign area is 500 square feet, 250 square feet per sign face. 10. The State of Washington has requirements for locating signs next to freeways. The applicant must obtain any required permits or approvals from the state. If you are unable to attend the meeting, you may submit your comments in writing addressed to: Margaret H. Clark, Senior Planner City of Federal Way PO Box 9718 Federal Way, W A 98063-9718 The Planning Commission will be continuing their public hearing on this topic at 7:00 p.m. on June 15, 2005, in the City Hall Council Chambers. You are also invited to attend the public hearing, or submit written comments either prior to the hearing or during the hearing. Please call Senior Planer Margaret Clark at (253) 835-2646 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy McClung, Director Community Development Services Enc: Draft Code Language Map Showing Properties Eligible for Freeway Profile Signs (only one sign per subject property) Cross-Section Showing Allowable Heights Of Signs c: City of Federal Way Planning Commission Margaret Clark, Senior Planner EXHIBIT --1L- PAGE-LOF-~ 1,12005 Code Amendmentslfreeway Commercial SignsIP¡"",ing Ct>mmi"ionIL"uer to Owno", and 8usinossos,doc May 19,2005 Re: DRAFT Language for Freeway Profile Signs Dear Sign Contractor: The City of Federal Way is in the process of drafting amendments to the sign code to allow for a new category of signs to be adopted for commercial properties adjacent to 1-5. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 20, 2005. We are enclosing a copy of the DRAFT language for Freeway Profile Signs. Please review this draft and submit your written comments to Code Compliance Officer Betty Cruz at betty.~!:uz(¿~-çj.tY.QffçQÇE!J~J!Y",Ç-QJn. The following summarizes how Freeway Profile Signs would work based on the existing draft: 1. Only properties abutting 1-5 and located within the City Center-Core (CC-C) and Community Business (Be) zoning districts would be eligible for an additional pylon or pole sign. 2. A pylon or pole sign must have a minimum of two poles. It may have one pole or structural support ifit results in superior design; however, the City's Community Development Services Director must approve this. 3. Signs must be oriented toward 1-5, be visible from 1-5 (not the off-ramps), and be located near the property line closest to 1-5. 4. Design ofthe sign must be compatible to the architecture of the primary structure on the site, or to the primary sign(s) already permitted. 5. Font sizes must be a minimum of two (2) feet tall. 6. Animated or moving signs, electronic changeable copy, changeable copy, or electronic message centers will not be permitted. 7. If the sign is located on property adjacent to the treeway and the property on which the sign is to be located is below the elevation of the freeway, the height of the sign shall be no taller than 25 feet above the elevation of the freeway; however, the sign can be no taller than 60 feet above the average finished ground elevation measured at the midpoint of the sign base. 8. If the sign is located on property adjacent to the freeway and the property on which the sign is to be located is above the elevation ofthe freeway, the sign can be no taller than 20 feet above the average finished ground elevation . ~ 'uoo,,~ A_~~.'_-. c~w ,.~"..,", ~-",."'~.... c=,~- ~ ~~: I B}T _OF 3- Sign Contractor Page 2 May 19, 2005 measured at the mid-point of the base. However, sign height can be increased up to a maximum of 40 feet above the average finished ground elevation measured at the midHpoint of the base in order to be visible above trees or other obstructions. Any increase in height above 20 feet is subject to the approval of the City's Community Development Services Director. 9. Maximum sign area is 500 square feet, 250 square feet per sign face. 10. The State of Washington has requirements for locating signs next to freeways. The applicant must obtain any required permits or approvals from the state. The Planning Commission will be continuing their public hearing on this topic at 7:00 p.m. on June 15,2005, in the City Hall Council Chambers. You are invited to attend the public hearing, or submit written comments either prior to the hearing or during the hearing. Please call Code Compliance Officer Betty Cruz at (253) 835-2632, or Senior Planner Margaret Clark, AICP, at (253) 835-2646 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy McClung, Director Community Development Services Ene: Draft Code Language Map Showing Properties Eligible for Freeway Profile Signs (only one sign per subject property) Cross-Section Showing Allowable Heights of Signs e: City of Federal Way Planning Commission Betty Cruz, Code Compliance Officer Margaret Clark, A/CP, Senior Planner EXHIBIT --E PAGE---Z.-OF -3- L\1005 Code Amc:ndmcntSlFrecway Commercial Signs\l'lanning CommissionlLetter to Sign Contraetnrs,doe MEYER SIGN & ADVERTISING CO 1689 HWY 99 S MT VERNON W A 98273 VILMA SIGNS 30432 MILITARY RD S FEDERAL WAYWA 98003 FEDERAL WAY SIGN CO 1908 S 341sT PL STE 5 FEDERAL WAYWA 98003 MULTI-LIGHT BROADWAY SIGN 809 NE LOMBARD PORTLAND OR 97211 YOUNG ELECTRIC SIGN CO 416 41sT ST BOISE ID 83714 OLYMPIC SIGN SERVICES 2702 12TH AVE NE OLMPYIA W A 98506 APOLLO NEON 9800 HARBOUR PL STE 208 MUKIL TEO WA 98275 GRAPHIC DISPLAY INC 6545 5TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98108 SIGN ASSOCIATES INC 6825 176TH AVE NE UNIT 125 REDMOND WA 98052 SHORELINE SIGN & AWNING 17034 AURORA AVE N SHORELINE WA 98133 EVERGREEN SIGN CO 1513 S CENTRAL KENTWA 98032 EAGLE SIGNS 2110 W WASHINGTON AVE TACOMA WA 98903 TOTAL SIGN SERVICE 10420 224TH 8T E GRAHAM WA 98338 Mailed to Following Sign Contractors: SIGN GUYS CORP 1626 S 341 ST PL STE A-24 FEDERAL WAY W A 98003 THE SIGN FACTORY 815 8TH ST KIRKLAND WA 98033 COASTLINE SIGNS 906 W HERON ABERDEEN WA 98520 TUBE ART DISPLAYS 2730 OCCIDENTAL AVE S SEATTLE WA 98124-1333 SOUND ELECTRIC CONSTRUCT 10422 224TH ST E GRAHAM WA 98338 SPEEDY SIGN A RAMA 32028 23RD AVE S FEDERAL WAYWA 98003 AMERICAN NEON INC PO BOX 431 TACOMA WA 98401 GFC SIGNS 235A RAINIER AVE S RENTON W A 98055 BROTHER SIGN INC 2608 104TH ST CT S STE J-2 LAKEWOOD WA 98499 INSIGNIA SIGN INC PO BOX 2849 RENTON WA 98056 DWINELL'S VISUAL SYSTEMS 814 6TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98134 CAPITOL SIGN & AWNING PO BOX 8106 LACEY WA 98509 WESTERN NEON INC 2700 1ST AVE S SEATTLE WA 98134 CULBERTSON SIGN SERVICE 5209 122ND ST E TACOMA WA 98446 SIGN-TECH ELECTRIC 33759 9TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY W A 98003 PLUMB SIGNS 909 S 28TH ST TACOMA WA 98409 BERRY NEON CO INC 7400 HARDENSON RD EVERETT W A 98203 FANCY SIGN.COM 33310 PACIFIC HWY S UNIT 403 FEDERAL WAY W A 98003 LUMIN ART SIGNS INC 3931 B ST NW AUBURN WA 98001 NEW IMAGE NEON 1941 66TH AVE S KENT WA 98032 1-5 SIGNS INC 8~1COMMERCERDRNE LACEYWA 98516 INTERNATIONAL SIGN CO 12414 HWY 99 S STE 2 EVERETTWA 98204 NATIONAL SIGN CORP 1255 WESTLAKE AVE N SEATTLE WA 98109 HANSON SIGN CO INC PO BOX 928 SILVERDALE WA 98383 SIGN SOLUTIONS INC PO BOX 8059 LACEY WA 98509 EXH I BIT -E PAGE--1-oF -3- I:\DOCUMENl\Freeway Profile Signs\Exhibit of Property - Business - Contractor Labels.doc [~2~~~Lc¿I2H~-]3i~,::~~g~~iII2r "i_df~fu~!2ri~ò~I§I~~1,.E!~~~~~ð~~:,~:::.=-~:_::':::::::".:,., ",," "..,,----- -::',. "='~::m:::..,.,:...",..,~..-]:~~1J From: To: Date: Subject: "CHARLOTTE BASS" <CBAS490@wadnr.gov> <Margaret. C la rk@cityoffederalway.com > 6/6/20058:50:18 AM Re: Request for infomation on Forest Practice Act Margaret, Good morning! The WACs give the definitions of the Classification of Forest Practice Activities. You can find these In WAC 222-16-050. The activities listed under the Class I permits do not require a permiit from the Dept. of Natural Resources. If you are inquiring about thinning commercially and not being in a sensitive area then you would not need a permit. If you have further questions or need further clarification don't hesitate to ask me or Sherry Tomlinson via e-mail or call us at 360-802-7054. »> "Margaret Clark" <Margaret.Clark@cityoffederalway.com> 6/3/20054:42: 15 PM »> Hi Charlotte, I have a very small question. Is there some place specific in the WAC where I can find tree trimming to be exempt from the Forest Practices Act. Or is there a brochure or cheat sheet that explains the Act in layman's terms? I know intuitively that it has to be an exemption. but I can't- find a specific reference. I am responding to a series of questions from the Planning Commission. Thanks in advance for your help. Margaret H. Clark. Senior Planner Community Development Services City of Federal Way (253) 835-2646 m argaret. clark@ci.federal-way.wa.us . ' EXHIBIT F PAGE , OF -L,- r Top I , R U. ! 1~1¡/1-----f--,' ,..r-----!! i I ',I . . i " ~i"!I' II~>,j .i ;]' ¡,i,I.,III~"!,~,,!,,,',.,,'" 1";"';~4!¡ ; " I, ¡ ! 11 ! ,~-1 ii i ¡i (J~ Ii Yr, ',' " ' ~'! i i ;" 'h--~L-L'+-i , ,il ¡i I .1 ¡' ¡ " I [i " I j I'! '---.J . .i. i ,\ i' I ¡L. ,. " 'I ~ . --t----L~. j , I "18TH IT SIaITNIT ------ Jr---~ -- -T..~ i -~ /' i on... i¡ ~<, i J /// i,i .""," iil~_- ---/--îl-'------4 i O~I" " i ."""" ,', ,/-"-----/ ------~--- , i r~n. ~/Cj:ty~C_e_t1ter r ,i r" ,i , I - / 8 ,i~--1-5--&-S~~~11/ 9"" I " ' ... / \ ./ / #~ _./ ./ /' ,) i I / ! i L- I City of Federal Way Subject Properties, -Potential Freeway Profile Signs Legend Possible Sign, Below Freeway 0 Possible Sign Location Freeway Measuring Point Possible Sign, Above Freeway 0 Possible Sign Location D Freeway Measuring Point .. Property Below Freeway .. Property Both Above and Below Freeway Property Above Freeway City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S, PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063 (253) 835-2558 www.cityoffederaJway.com 6 N 0 0.125 0.25 Miles l I I Scale: City Center Map 0 0.125 0.25 Miles I I I Scale: 1-5 and SR 18 This map is accompanied by NO warranties, and is simply a graphic representation. Subject Properties: Gatewav Center: (Parcels: 092104-9021, 092104--9027,092104--9031, 092104--9035, 092104--9137, 092104-9185, 092104-9320, 092104-9328) BP Mini-Mart (Parcel 599970-0010) Federal Way Center and La Quinta Inn (Parcels 797820-0535, -0540) eo Federal Way Park and Ride W (Parce1 797820-0526) Younavul ProDertv (Parcel 092104-9318) Winchester Investments (Parcel 092104-9310) Pruett PraDertv (Parcel 092104-9028) All American Homes (Parcel 092104-9139) All American Hames (ParceI092104-9316) œ =212104-9010, 212104-9088) "" SuDer 8 Motel W (Parcel 212104-9078) Camous Sou are and Costco ~ (Parcels 219260-0180, W 219260-0290,219260-0570, 219260-0590) ~ Home DeDot and Video OnlY 'Ii' (Parcel 282104-9008, 282104-9079) Vacant ProDertv (Parcel 282104-9124) Vacant ProDertv (ParoeI282104-9028) Jet Chevrolet (Parcel 282104-9069)