Council PKT 07-18-2006
-- --- ---------
Archive
,~ Federal Way
City Council Meeting
AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBERS
Mike Park, Mayor
Jeanne Burbidge Jim Ferrell
Jack Dovey Linda Kachmar
Eric Faison Dean McColgan
CITY MANAGER
Derek Matheson,
Interim City Manager
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
July 18, 2006-Regular Meeting
-------- --
AGENDA
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
Council Chambers - City Hall
July 18,2006 - 7:00 PM
(www.cityoffederalway.com)
*****
l. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PRESENTATIONS
a. Federal Way School District Green Schools Recognition
b. Rotary Club ~ Acceptance of $25,000 towards the Community Center
d. City Manager- Introduction of New Employees
e. City Manager - Emerging Issues
4. CITIZEN COMMENT
PLEASE COMPLETE THE PINK SLIP & PRESENT TO THE CITY CLERK PRJORTO SPEAKING. Citizens
may address City Council at this time. When recognized by the Mayor, please come forward to the podium and state
your name for the record. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE (3) MINUTES. The Mayor may interrupt
citizen comments that continue too long, relate negatively to other individuals, or are otherwise inappropriate.
5. CONSENT AGENDA
Items listed below have been previously reviewed by a Council Committee of three members and brought
before full Council for approval; all items are enacted by one motion. Individual items may be removed by
a Councilmember for separate discussion and subsequent motion.
a. Minutes: Approval of the June 29,2006 Special Meeting
b. Bid Acceptance for the Purchase of a Bomb Van
c. 2006 Justice Assistance Grant
d. Thompson Property Park: A ward Bid
e. WiFi Internet Service Options for Federal Way
f. French Lake Off-Leash Dog Park
g. Naming Thompson Property - Cedar Grove Park
h. Cabins Park Phase II: Parking Lot - Reject Bid and Authorize to Re-Bid in Smaller
Packages
1. Cabins Park: PSE Easement
------ --------------
------
6. PUBLIC HEARING
a. Six-Year (2007-2012) Transportation Improvement Plan
1. Staff Report
ii. Citizen Comment (3 minute limit)
iii. Action - Adoption of Resolution
7. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
8. CITY MANAGER REPORT
9. EXECUTIVE SESSION
a. Potential Litigation Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i)
b. Sale of Property Pursuant to RCW 42.30.1lO(l)(c)
c. Property Acquisition Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(b)
10. ADJOURNMENT
COUN<:!_~ M~_~!!~_~!?~ TE: ..JulL!.~~~_~~___________.__________._..______ ITEM #: 5-~___
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCa MEETING MINUTES
POLICY QUESTION: Should Council approve the draft minutes of the June 29, 2006 Special Meeting as
presented?
COMMITTEE: Not Applicable MEETING DATE: Not Applicable
CATEGORY:
IZI Consent D Ordinance DPublic Hearing
D City Council Business D Resolution D Other
STAFF REPORT By: Not Applicable DEPT: Not Applicable
___,___._.__w________M__.._.__ .._________.._.___._.._._._.________.______.._....__.__________.____.__
Attachments:
Draft meeting minutes of the June 29, 2006 Special Meeting.
Options Considered:
1. Approve the minutes as presented.
2. Amend the minutes as necessary.
_._.___..____.___.w__..__.__.____.__...__ ..____......__._.._._____....__.___.______.______
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the minutes as presented.
CITY MANAGER ApPROVAL: N/A DIRECTOR ApPROV AL: N/A N/A
Committee Commillee Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the meeting minutes of the June 29, 2006 Special
Meeting.
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACfION:
o APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
o DENIED 1ST reading
o T ABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACfION Enactment reading
o MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED - 0210612006 RESOLUTION #
~
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers - City Hall
June 29, 2006
Special Meeting
6:00 PM
MINUTES
(www.dtyoffederalway.com)
******
1. CALL MEEnNG TO ORDER
Mayor Park called the special meeting to order at 6:05 PM.
Councilmembers Burbidge, Dovey, Faison, Kochmar, McColgan, Deputy-Mayor: Ferre}};-> I.:", . -
and Mayor Park present. .!" . -
2. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE AmON ; "-.J. : ., -.
Councilmember McColgan, Chair of the City Manager Search Committee, reviewed the
process Council used in determining candidates for the City Manager. He stated choosing a
City Manager is a difficult decision and he appreciated the public process, the interview
panels' input as well as the input of the management staff.
Councilmember McColgan announced Council narrowed the choice down to two final
candidates: Derek Matheson and Neal Beets. He believes these two candidates presented
themselves as the best candidates for Federal Way. He stated that Mr. Beets has more
experience in economic development and if the decision is broken down he would vote for
Mr. Beets based on his experience.
Councilmember Kochmar stated that after meeting all five finalists, it boiled down to who
would be the best fit for the City. While Mr. Matheson knows Federal Way, Mr. Beets has
more experience and rose to the top.
Councilmember Dovey stated that all finalists were strong but he feels that Mr. Beets is the
most qualified based on his experience and maturity.
Deputy Mayor Ferrell echoed the previous statements and praised the process. He
complimented Mr. Matheson for his work as Interim City Manager but feels that Mr. Beets
would be best suited for the City Manager position.
--
----------
Councilmember Burbidge expressed her thanks to the community and staff for their input
into the process. She feels there are two strong finalists: Mr. Matheson with his education,
history with Federal Way, and integrity; and Mr. Beets with his breadth and depth of
experience in economic development and strategic planning.
Councilmember Faison echoed his colleagues' sentiments and stated that he hopes Mr.
Matheson will stay on with the City but believes that Mr. Beets is the right fit for City
Manager.
Mayor Park echoed the comments of the rest of Council and thanked those who served on
the public interview panels and appreciated their input as well as the input o(the staff.
MOTION: Councilmember McColgan moved to appoint Neal Beets as City Manager and
authorize the Mayor to execute a mutually acceptable employment contract. Deputy Mayor
Ferrell second. The motion carried 7-0.
3. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Park adjourned the meeting at 6:29 PM.
."~ "'_ .;' !,~ :T_ .-" " ~" ~.~'.... ~.":', ..-,-: ,. ,",. - ATTEST:
. . .
, ".'
Laura K. Hathaway, City Clerk
Approved by Council on:
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18,2006 ITEM #: 5-b
__... ___......______.._.....___"._.__.___h.__.______.___....___.__..._.....__.__....__________..._.__.______ ----
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: Bid Acceptance for the Purchase of Bomb Van
POLlCY QUESTION: MAY TIlE POLICE DEP ARlMENT ACCEPT THE BID FROM PACIFIC COAST FORD FOR TIlE
PURCHASE OF A BOMB V AN?
COMMITTEE: Land Useffransportation MEETING DATE: April 25, 2005
CATEGORY:
~ Consent if} Ordinance 0 Public Hearing
0 City Council Business 0 Resolution 0 Other
STAFF REpORT By: Commander Andy Hwang DEPT: PS
.....--..-.------.---.----.....---.....--.-.-.--.--.......-..-----------.--.-----.-----..-..--..-.----
Attachments:
1. Staff report
2.
Options Considered:
1. Accept Pacific Coast Ford's Bid $38,875.60
2. Accept Lynnwood Harris Ford's Bid $41,094.70
3. Accept Braun Northwest's Bid $57,059.30
-.-..------------"-----.-.....-------.-....---.--- ...----------...-.-..-
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option 1. The Police Department staff not being aware of the
requirements of this report to Council, obtained competitive bids and purchased the vehicle from Pacific Coast Ford, located
in the City of Federal Way. The staff believed that Council approval to accept the Homeland Security Grant was sufficient
and no other ap roval was required. ff recommen at Council a rove the purchase of the new Bomb Van.
CITY MANAGER ApPROVAL: DIRECTOR ApPROVAL: ~/v-./"'"-t/J~
Committee Council
,
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Forward the bid results and acceptance of Option 1 to full Council for their
approval at the July 18, 2006 meeting.
,
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: HI move oval of the Bid Acceptance of Option 1 for the Purchase of the
Bomb Van."
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OF FlCE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
0 DENIED 1 ST reading
0 T ABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVIS ED - 02/0612006 RESOLUTION #
l-\-\
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCil.. COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 10,2006
TO: Parks, Recreation, and Public Safety Council Committee
VIA: Derek Matheson, City Manage~
FROM: Anne Kirkpatrick, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Bid Acceptance for the Purchase of Bomb Van
Background:
In September 2005, Committee/Council approved the acceptance of the grant for a new Bomb
Van. The funding was provided by a Department of Homeland Security Grant of $50,000 to
enhance the city's response to critical incidents involving Improved Explosive Devices (lED).
Staff solicited bids for a Bomb Van, 2006 Ford E-450, with specific configuration and following
are the bids:
Bidder Pacific Coast Ford Lynnwood Harris Ford Braun Northwest
Unit Price $35,633.00 $37,667.00 $52,300.00
Sales Tax 9.1 % $3,242.60 $3,427.70 $4,759.30
Grand Total $38,875.60 $41,094.70 $57,059.30
1
\-\ - l-
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18,2006 ITEM #: 5-c
__________.._._._H_..._~___._.._..._.._....___._.._..__..__~___.____._.......__.___ .......hh...___..___.._.___ ....____.._.________...._._
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: 2006 JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT
POLICY QUESTION: Should the Federal Way Police Department accept the 2006 Justice Assistance Grant
award for $29,114 to finance improved technology (laptop computer docking stations)?
COMMITTEE: Parks, Recreation, and Public Safety Committee MEETING DATE: July 10,2006
CATEGORY:
~ Consent-.'::-, 0 Ordinance 0 Public-Hearing
0 City Council Business :0 Resolution 0 Other.. -.,.{',':.'.,' , '," .
~TA~F J!!:~ORT B.Y: Comm~de!:..Gre~~~so!!_____________.___________ DEPT: Public Safety
. . .._-----------
Attachments: .:.\ "
1. Staff report to Parks, Recreation, and Public Safety Council dated July 10, 2006.
2. 2006 Justice Assistance Grant Award Letter and Special Conditions documents.
Options Considered:
1. Authorize the City Manager to accept the 2006 Justice Assistance Grant award in the amount of $29,114 for
the purchase of 46 Itronix GoBook IIJIII vehicle cradles at a cost of $525 each.
2. Not authorize the City Manager to accept this Agreement.
.-----------.--------. ---..---- M._..____.____
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Stat: recommends 0 tion 1.
CITY MANAGER ApPROVAL: DIRECTOR ApPROVAL: Initial
Committee Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Parks, Recreation, and Public Safety Committee r
(
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTiON: "I move approval of the 2006 Justice Assist
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY aTY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
0 DENIED 1ST reading
0 TABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION Enactment reading
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED - 02l0mo06 RESOLUTION #
:!-l
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 10, 2006
TO: Parks, Recreation, and Public Safety Wmmitlee
VIA: Derek Matheson, Interim City Manag
FROM: Anne Kirkpatrick, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: 2006 Justice Assistance Grant . iJ'
. -"'.! r..,
Background .......-
The Federal Way Police Department would like to enable and expand our police field officers
capability to access public safety related data, pictures, voice and video "outside" of the vehicle
by providing a vehicle docking station.
The city currently provides broadband wireless technology on the police vehicle laptop; however,
the laptop is "hard wired" into the vehicle, thus restricting the officer's ability to bring
technology to our consumer.
The Office of Justice Programs has approved our application for technology funding under the
2006 Justice Assistance Grant in the amount of $29,114. The intent of the Police Department is
to use this grant money to purchase vehicle docking stations to outfit 46 of our front line patrol
fleet vehicles at a total cost of $29,114. Once installed officers can remove the laptop to take
into a reporting parties home or business to complete statements and field reporting requirements
without the need to return to the station for report preparation. Documents such as search
warrants can be. prepared on scene and executed in a timely and efficient manner. Officers can
take laptops to neighborhood or community meetings, having instant access to data and provide
feedback on a real-time basis.
Providing this flexibility allows officers to remain deployed in their Patrol Sectors for longer
periods of time during their shift, as they are not restricted to their Patrol car for the purposes of
report writing. It further affords the officers an ergonomically friendly way of using their laptop.
The docking station allows the officer to remove the laptop from its cradle and it easily hangs
from the steering wheel for reporting writing purposes while parked in highly visible area within
the Patrol Sector.
1
=t-l.-
Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
Bureau of Justice Assistance
Office of Justice Programs Washington. D.C. 20531
June 14,2006
Mr. Derrick Matheson
City of Federal Way
33325 8th Ave South
P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
. Dear Mr. Matheson:
On behalf of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, it is my pleasure to inform you that the Office of Justice Programs has
approved your application for funding under the FY 2006 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program in
the amount of $29,1 14 for City of Federal Way.
Enclosed you will find the Grant Award and Special Conditions documents_ This award is subject to all administrative and.
financial requirements, including the timely submission of all financial and programmatic reports, resolution of all interim
audit findings, and the maintenance of a minimum level of cash-on-hand. Should you not adhere to these requirements, you
will be in violation of the terms of this agreement and the award will be subject to termination for cause or other administrative
action as appropriate.
lfyou have questions regarding this award, please contact:
- Program Questions, Jeffrey S. Felten-Green, Program Manager at (202) 514-8874; and
- Financial Questions, the Office of the Comptroller, Customer Service Center (CSC) at
(800) 458-0786, or you may contact the CSC at ask.oc@usdoj.gov.
Congratulations, and we look forward to working with you.
Sincerely,
r[) /1- -...,
'---.)
Domingo S. Herraiz
Director, Bureau of Justice Assistance
Enclosures
-r--~
Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
Office for Civil Rights
Washing/on. D.C 20531
June 14,2006
Mr. Derrick Matheson
City of Federal Way
33325 8th Ave South
P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
Dear Mr. Matheson:
Congratulations on your recent award. In establishing financial assistance programs, Congress linked the receipt of
., Federal funding to compliance with Federal civil rights laws. The Office for Civil Rights (OCR), Office of Justice
Programs (OJP), U.S. Department of Justice is responsible for ensuring that recipients of financial aid from OJP,
its component offices and bureaus, the Office on Violence Against Women (OVW), and the Office of Community
Oriented Policing Services (COPS) comply with applicable Federal civil rights statutes and regulations. We at
., .' . OCR are available to help you and your organization meet the civil rights requirements that come with Justice
Department funding. .
Ensuring Access to FederallyAssisted Programs
As you know, Federal laws prohibit recipients of financial assistance from discriminating on the basis of race,
color, national origin, religion, sex, or disability in funded programs or activities, not only in respect to
employment practices but also in the delivery of services or benefits. Federal law also prohibits funded programs
or activities
from discriminating on the basis of age in the delivery of services or benefits.
Providing Services to Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Individuals
In accordance with Department of Justice Guidance pertaining to Title VI ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42
U.S.C. ~ 2000d, recipients of Federal financial assistance must take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access
to their programs and activities for persons with limited English proficiency (LEP). For more information on the
civil rights responsibilities that recipients have in providing language services to LEP individuals, please see the
website at http://www.lep.gov.
Ensuring Equal Treatment for Faith-Based Organizations
The Department of Justice has published a regulation specifically pertaining to the funding of faith-based
organizations. In general, the regulation, Participation in Justice Department Programs by Religious Organizations;
Providing for Equal Treatment of all Justice Department Program Participants, and known as the Equal Treatment
Regulation 28 C.F.R. part 38, requires State Administering Agencies to treat these organizations the same as any
other applicant or recipient. The regulation prohibits State Administering Agencies from making award or grant
administration decisions on the basis of an organization's religious character or affiliation, religious name, or the
religious composition of its.board of directors.
The regulation also prohibits faith-based organizations from using financial assistance from the Deparnnent of
Justice to fund inherently religious activities. While faith-based organizations can engage in non-funded
inherently religious activities, they must be held separately from the Department of Justice funded program, and
customers or beneficiaries cannot be compelled to participate in them. The Equal Treatment Regulation also makes
clear that organizations participating in programs funded by the Department of Justice are not permitted to
discriminate in the provision of services on the basis of a beneficiary's religion. For more information on the
regulation, please see OCR's website at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ocr/etfbo.htm.
-:t -l,J
State Administering Agencies and faith-based organizations should also note that the Safe Streets Act, as
amended; the Victims of Crime Act, as amended; and the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act; as
amended, contain prohibitions against discrimination on the basis of religion in employment. These employment
provisions have been specifically incorporated into 28 C.F.R. Part 38.1 (f) and 38.2(f). Consequently, in many
circumstances, it would be impermissible for faith-based organizations seeking or receiving funding authorized by
these statutes to have policies or practices that condition hiring and other employment-related decisions on the
religion of applicants or employees. Programs subject to these nondiscrimination provisions may be found on
OCR's wepsite at http://wwW.ojp.usdoj.gov/ocr/. Questions about the regulation or the statutes that prohibit
discrimination in employment may be directed to this Office.
Enforcing Civil Rigbts Laws
All recipients of Federal financial assistance, regardless of the particular funding source, the amount of the grant
award, or the number of employees in the workforce, are subject to the prohibitions against unlawful
discrimination. Accordingly, OCR investigates recipients that are the subject of discrimination complaints from
both individuals and groups. In addition, based on regulatory criteria, OCR selects a number of recipients each year
for compliance reviews, audits that require recipients to submit data showing that they are providing services
equitably to all segments of their service population and that their employment practices meet equal employment .... .
opportunity standards. .. ~..:. .-
Complying witb tbe Safe Streets Act or Program Requirements
In addition to these general prohibitions, an organization which is a recipient of financial assistance subject to
the.nondiscrimination provisions of the Omnibus Crime Control. and Safe-Streets Act (Safe Streets Act) of 1968,
42
U.S.c. ~ 3789d(c), or other Federal grant program requirements, must meet two additional requirements:(I)
complying with Federal regulations pertaining to the development of an Equal Employment Opportunity Plan
(EEOP), 28 C.F.R. ~ 42.301-.308, and (2) submitting to OCR Findings of Discrimination (see 28 C.F.R. ~~
42.205(5) or 31.202(5)).
J) Meeting tbe EEOP Requirement
In accordance with Federal regulations, Assurance No.6 in the Standard Assurances, COPS Assurance No. 8.B, or
certain Federal grant program requirements, your organization must comply with the following EEOP reporting
requirements:
If your organization has received an award for $500,000 or more and has 50 or more employees (counting both
full- and part-time employees but excluding political appointees), then it has to prepare an EEOP and submit it to
OCR for review witbin 60 days from tbe date oftbis letter. For assistance in developing an EEOP, please
consult OCR's website at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ocr/eeop.htm. You may also request tecbnical assistance from
an EEOPspecialist at OCR by dialing (202) 616-3208.
If your organization received an award between $25,000 and $500,000 and has 50 or more employees, your
organization still has to prepare an EEOP, but it does not have to submit the EEOP to OCR for review. Instead,
your organization has to maintain the EEOP .on file and make it available for review on request. In addition, your
organization has to complete Section B of the Certification Form and return it to OCR. The Certification Form can
be found at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ocr/eeop.htm.
If your organization received an award for less than $25,000.; or if your organization has less than 50 employees,
regardless of the amount of the award; or if your organization is a medical institution, educational institution,
nonprofit organization or Indian tribe, then YOUT organization is exempt from the EEOP requirement. However,
your organization must complete Section A of the Certification Form and return it to OCR. The Certification Form
can be found at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ocr/eeop.htm.
2) Submitting Findings of Discrimination
In the event a Federal or State court or Federal or State administrative agency makes an adverse rmding of
discrimination against your organization after a due process hearing, on the ground of race, color, religion,
national origin, or sex, your organization must submit a copy of the finding to OCR for review.
"-:J--S
---- .,
1
Ensuring the Compliance of Subrecipients
If your organization makes subawards to other agencies, you are responsible for assuring that subrecipients also
comply with all of the applicable Federal civil rights laws, including the requirements pertaining to developing
and submitting an EEOP, reporting Findings of Discrimination, and providing language services to LEP persons.
State agencies that make subawards must have in place standard grant assurances and review procedures to
demonstrate that they are effectively monitoring the civil rights compliance of subrecipients.
If we can assist you in any way in fulfilling your civil rights responsibilities as a recipient of Federal funding,
please call OCR at (202) 307-0690 or visit our website at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ocr/.
Sincerely,
~.;.~
Michael L. Alston
Director
cc: Grant Manager
Financial Analyst
:I-b
-
.-.__._---------~--
i Department of Justice i !
I
! i
Office of Justice Programs i I :
I PAGE 1 OF 5
Bureau of Justice Assistance I Grant ! I
I i I
I I
I
I I
; I. !
I '
-~------_. ! ___L ~
I. ~CIPIENT NAME AND ADDRESS (Including Zip Code) !4.AWARDNUMBER: 2006-DJ-BX-0304 ----~----_._------I
I
City of Federal Way I
i 33325 8th Ave South P.O. Box 9718 ! 5. PROJECT PERIOD: FROM 1010112005 TO 09/30/2009 j
I Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 i
I BUDGET PERIOD: FROM 10/0112005 TO 09130/2009
I
I 6. AWARD DATE 0611412006 : 7. ACTION
I i
IA. GRANTEE IRSNENDOR NO. 18. SUPPLEMENT NUMBER Initial I
911462550 i 00 i
I i ..-
t 9. PREVIOUS AWARD AMOUNT SO ,
I i
I 3. PROJECT TITLE I 10. AMOUNT OF THIS AWARD S29,I14
I MDC Project ! . I
1/1. TOTAL AWARD $29,114
I
! 12. SPECIAL CONDITIONS !
i THE ABOVE GRANT PROJECT IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO SUCH CONDITIONS OR LIMITATIONS AS ARE SET FORTH I
ON THE A IT ACHED PAGE(S).
13. STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR GRANT i
This project is supported under P.L. 109-108
15. METHOD OF PAYMENT
PAPRS
I
I
AGENCY APPROVAL I GRANTEE ACCEPTANCE 1
16. TYPED NAME AND TITLE OF APPROVING OFFICIAL I 18. TYPED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GRANTEE OFFICIAL I
I
Domingo S. Herraiz Derrick Matheson i
Director~ Bureau of Justice Assistance City Manager I
I
17. SIGNATURE OF APPROVING OFFICIAL 19. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED RECIPIENT OFFICIAL I 19A.DATE
d).l~ I
I
AGENCY USE ONLY
20. ACCOUNTING CLASSIFICATION CODES 21. DJ06UOO804 !
FISCAL FUND BUD. DlV.
YEAR CODE ACT. OFC. REG. SUB. POMS AMOUNT
X B DJ 80 00 00 29114
OJP FORM 4000/2 (REV. 5-87) PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.
OJP FORM 4000/2 (REV. 4-88)
~-l
1-----.--.. ~---~--. -- ----.-----------.
i
I I
Department of Justice i
,
I Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUA nON ,
I SHEET I
Bureau of Justice I PAGE 2 OF 5 ;
Assistance i i
Grant ,
i I I
\ j i
i i !
! I
I :
I --~-- r ,
!
I PROJECT NUMBER 2006.DJ.BX-0304 AWARD DATE 06114n006 i
I
I SPECIAL CONDITIONS I
i
j 1. The recipient agrees to comply with the financial and administrative requirements set forth in the current edition of the i
Office of Justice Programs (OJP) Financial Guide. !
!
2. The recipient acknowledges that failure to submit an acceptable Equal Employment Opportunity Plan (if recipient is I
I required to submit one pursuant to 28 C.F.R. Section 42.302), that is approved by the Office for Civil Rights, is a. I
i
violation of its Certified Assurances and may result in suspension or tennination of funding, until such time as the I
recipient is in compliance. i
3. The recipient agrees to comply with the organizational audit requirements ofOMB Circular A-B3,Audits of States,
Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations, as further described in the current edition of the OJP Financial I
Guide, Chapter 19. I
i
I 4. Recipient understands and agrees that it cannot use any federal funds, either directly or indirectly, in support of the I
enactment, repeal, modification or adoption of any law, regulation or policy, at any level of government, without the I
express prior written approval of OJP.
I I
5. The grantee agrees to assist BJA in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other related I
I
federal environmental impact analyses requirements in the use of these grant funds, either directly by the grantee or by
a subgrantee. Accordingly, prior to obligating grant funds, the grantee agrees to first determine ifany of the following
activities will be related to the use of the grant funds.
The grantee understands that this special condition applies to its following new activities whether or not they are being
specifically funded with these grant funds. That is, as long as the activity is being conducted by the grantee, a I
subgrantee, or any third party and the activity needs to be undertaken in order to use these grant funds, this special I
condition must first be met. The activities covered by this special condition are:
a. New construction; I
b. Minor renovation or remodeling of a property either (a) listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of I
I Historic Places or (b) located within a 100-year flood plain; I
c. A renovation, lease, or any proposed use ofa building or facility that will either (a) result in a change in its basic
prior use or (b) significantly change its size; and,
d. Implementation of a new program involving the use of chemicals other than chemicals that are (a) purchased as an
incidental component of a funded activity and (b) traditionally used, for example, in office, household, recreational, or i
education environments. I
t Application of This Special Condition to Grantee's Existing Programs or Activities: For any of the grantee's or its
subgrantees' existing programs or activities that will be funded by these grant funds, the grantee, upon specific request I
from BJ A, agrees to cooperate with BJA in any preparation by BJA of a national or program environmental assessment
of that funded program or activity.
!
OJP FORM 4000n (REV. 4-88)
J-~
-
_______n__
r---..---~---- -- - - ---. ..- - . --------._- i --
i Department of Justice
!
! j
i Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUA nON
i Bureau of Justice SHEET PAGE 3 OF 5
,
I
Assistance Grant i
,
,
I
I I
,
~-_._-_.
, PROJECT NUMBER 2006-DJ-BX-0304 AWARD DATE 06114/2006
I SPECIAL CONDITIONS
\
i 6. This special condition facilitates compliance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
relating to clandestine methamphetamine laboratory operations, including the identification, seizure, or closure of !
clandestine methamphetamine laboratories [hereinafter, "meth lab operations"]. No monies from this award may be
obligated to support meth lab operations unless the grantee implements this special condition.
I The Office of Justice Programs (OJP), in consultation with the Bureau of Justice Assistance, the Drug Enforcement
Al:!ministration, and the Office for Community Oriented Policing Services, prepared a Program-level Environmental
Assessment (Assessment) governing meth lab operations. The Assessment describes the adverse environmental,
health, and safety impacts likely to be encountered by law enforcement agencies as they implement specific actions
under their methamphetamine laboratory operations_ . Consistent with the Assessment, the following terms and
conditions shall apply to the grantee for any OJP funded methlab operations:
.
i A. The grantee shall ensure compliance by OJP funded sub-grantees with federal, state, and local environmental,
! health, and safety laws and regulations applicable to meth lab operations, to include the disposal of the chemicals,
equipment, and wastes resulting from those operations.
B. The grantee shall have a Mitigation Plan in place that identifies and documents the processes and points of
accountability within its state. This plan will be used to ensure that the adverse environmental, health, and safety
impacts delineated in the Assessment are mitigated in a manner consistent with the requirements of this condition.
e. The grantee shall monitor OJP funded meth lab operations to ensure that they comply with the following nine
mitigation measures identified in the Assessment and whose implementation is addressed in the grantee's Mitigation
Plan. These mitigation measures must be included as special conditions in all subgrants: (See Part II of this special
condition)
7.. I. Provide medical screening of personnel assigned or to be assigned by the grantee to the seizure or closure of
clandestine methamphetamine laboratories;
I 2. Provide Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) required initial and refresher training for law
I enforcement officials and all other personnel assigned to either the seizure or closure of clandestine methamphetamine
I laboratories;
I 3. As determined by their specified duties, equip the personnel with OSHA required protective wear and other required
I safety equipment;
4. Assign properly trained personnel to prepare a comprehensive contamination report on each seized/closed
! laboratory;
5. Utilize qualified disposal personnel to remove all chemicals and associated glassware, equipment, and contaminated
materials and wastes from the site(s) of each seized laboratory;
6. Dispose of the chemicals, equipment, and contaminated materials and wastes at properly licensed disposal facilities
or, when allowable, at properly licensed recycling facilities; i
7. Monitor the transport, .disposal, and recycling components of subparagraphs numbered 5. and 6. immediately above I
in order to ensure proper compliance; I
8. Have in place and implement a written agreement with the responsible state environmental agenCy. This agreement
must provide that the responsible state environmental agency agrees to (i) timely evaluate the environmental condition
at and around the site of a closed clandestine laboratory and (ii) coordinate with the responsible party, property owner,
or others to ensure that any residual contamination is remediated, if determined necessary by the state environmental
agency and in accordance with existing state and federal requirements; and
9. Have in place and implement a written agreement with the responsible state or local service agencies to properly I
respond to any minot, as defined by state law, at the site. This agreement must ensure immediate response by qualified
personnel who can (i) respond to the potential health needs of any minor at the site; (ii) take that minor into protective I
custody wlless the minor is criminally involved in the meth lab activities or is subject to arrest for other criminal I
violations; (iii) ensure immediate medical testing for methamphetamine toxicity; and (iv) arrange for any follow-up
medical tests, examinations, or health care made necessary as a result of methamphetamine toxicity. !
OJP FORM 4000/2 (REV. 4-88)
J-~
-------
I !
I I
Department of Justice I
Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION
I
Bureau of Justice i SHEET I PAGE 4 OF 5 i
Assistance Grant ;
I
!
i
I ! I
n .____--,.~ ..--.->.--- I
PROJECT NUMBER 2006.DJ.BX-0304 AWARD DATE 06/]412006 I
i
--- -.--.- r
SPECIAL CONDITIONS !
8. The recipient agrees to submit to BJA for review and approval any curricula, training materials, or any other wrjtten I
materials that will be published, including web-based materials and web site content, through funds from this grant at
least thirty (30) working days prior to the targeted dissemination date.
9. To avoid duplicating existing networks or IT systems in any initiatives funded by BJA for law enforcement information I ,
, sharing systems which involvi:'interst~te connectivity between jurisdiction,such systems shall employ, to the .extent . ..
pOssible, existing networks as the communiCation backbone to achieve interstate connectivity, unless the grantc::ecatt. .'~. .:' :. . .,
demonslrlite .tothe satisfaction of BJA that this. requirement would not be cost effective or would impair the i.1 .;
functionality of an existing or proposed IT system. .
10. To support public safety and justice information sharing, OJP requires the grantee to use the Global Justice Data Model
specifications and guidelines for this particular grant. Grantee shall publish and. make available. without restriction all I .. !"..
schemas (extensions, constraint, proxy) generated as a result of this grant to the component registry as specified in the I
guidelines. This information is available at www.it.ojp.gov/gjxdm.
]1. The recipient is required to establish a tlUSt fund account. (The trust fimd mayor may not be an interest-bearing
I
account.) The fund may not be used to pay debts incurred by other activities beyond the scope of the Edward Byrne I
Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program (JAG). The recipient also agrees to obligate and expend the grant funds in
the trust fund (includiQg any interest earned) during the period of the grant. Grant funds (including any interest earned)
not expended by the end of the grant period must be returned to the Bureau of Justice Assistance no later than 90 days
after the end of the grant period, along with the final submission of the Financial Status RepOrt (SF-269).
12. The grantee agrees to comply with all reporting, data collection and evaluation requirements, as prescribed by the BJA
in the program guidance for the Justice Assistance Grant (JAG). Compliance with these requirements will be
monitored by BJA.
13. The recipient agrees that any information technology system funded or suppOrted by OJP funds will comply with 28 I
C.F.R. Part 23, Criminal Intelligence Systems Operating Policies, ifOJP determines this regulation to be applicable.
Should OJP determine 28 C.F.R. Part 23 to be applicable, OJP may, at its discretion, perform audits of the system, as
per 28 C.F.R. 23.20(g). Should any violation of28 C.F.R. Part 23 occur, the recipient may be fined as per 42 V.S.C.
3789g(c)-(d). Recipient may not satisty such a fine with federal funds. I
14. The recipient agrees that all income generated as a direct result of this award shall be deemed program income. All
program income must be accounted for and used for the purposes under the conditions applicable for the use of funds
under this award, including the effective edition of the OJP Financial Guide and, as applicable, either (I) 28 C.F.R. part
66 or (2) 28 C.F.R part 70 and OMB Circular A-I 10. Further, the use of program income must be shown on the
quarterly Financial Status RepOrt, SF269.
15. The recipient agrees to ensure that the State Information Technology Point of Contact receives written notification
i regarding any information technology project funded by this grant during the obligation and expenditure period. This is I
to facilitate communication among local and state governmental entities regarding various information technology
projects being conducted with these grant funds. In addition, the recipient agrees to maintain an administrative file
documenting the meeting of this requirement. For a list of State Information Technology Points of Contact, go to
htlp:llwww .ojp.usdoj.gov/ec/states.htm.
i 16. Grantee agrees to comply with the requirements of28 C.F.R. Part 46 and all Office of Justice Programs .policies and
procedures regarding the protection of human research subjects, including obtainment of Institutional Review Board
approval, if appropriate, and subject informed consent.
OIP FORM 4000/2 (REV. 4-88)
::t ,-ID
.-~- ---~----_._- - I '--'
I
Department of Justice i
I
t Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION l
i Bureau of Justice SHEET PAGE 5 Of 5
I i
I Assistance Grant I
i i
I I !
I
I I
I
! --I
PROJECT NUMBER 2006-DJ-BX-0304 AWARD DATE 0611412006
i I
I
I SPECIAL CONDITIONS I
I 17. Grantee agrees to comply with all confidentiality requirements of 42 U.S.c. section 3789g and 28 C.F.R. Part 22 that
!
are applicable to collection, use, and revelation of data or information. Grantee further agrees, as a condition of grant i
I
approval, to submit a Privacy Certificate that is in accord with requirements of28 C.F.R. Part 22 and, in particular, I
section 22.23. I
.' . . !
18. ~~cipie~t~grees that funds provided under this award may ~o.t be u~ed to operate a "paycto-stay" program in any local.' '1 .. .
Jail. ReCipient further agrees not to subaward funds to local Jalls which operate ~pay-to-stay" programs. I,. ... ,;i! .. ;",':..'
. ... I .
"Applicants must certify that Limited English Proficiency persons have meaningful access to the services under this I
19. I
I program(s). National origin discrimination includes discrimination on the basis oflimited English proficiency (LEP). I
I To ensure compliance with Title VI and the Safe Streets Act, recipients are required to take reasonable steps to ensure
; that LEP persons have meaningfu1.access to their programs. Meaningful access may entail providing language . I
! I ::'. .
assistance services, including oral and written translation when necessary. The U.s. Department of Justice has issued
guidance for grantees to help them comply with Title VI requirements. The guidance document can be accessed on the
Internet at www.lep.gov."
I ,
i
!
i
i
I
I
i
I
I
I
I I
I
I
OJP FORM 400012 (REV. 4-88)
:r ;-(\
Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
Bureau of Justice Assistance
Washington, D.C. 2053/
Memorandum To: Official Grant File
From: Muriel Collins, Environmental Coordinator
'";"'>'.,
Subject: . Incorporates NEPA Cdmpli~mce iri Further Developmental stages for City of Ftederal ..... . .
Way
All grants. funded under the Edward Byrne Memori~1 Justic,et\ssistance Grant Program (JAG) will carry
. the following NEPA special condition: .. .. .. . . . .. " ., ,"
I) The grantee agrees to assist BJA in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
and other related federal environmental impact analyses requirements in the use of these grant funds,
either directly by the grantee or by a subgrantee. Accordingly, prior to obligating grant funds, the grantee
agrees to first determine if any of the following activities will be related to the use of the grant funds. The
grantee understands that this special condition applies to its following new activities whether or not they
are being specifically funded with these grant funds. That is, as long as the activity is being conducted by
the grantee, a subgrantee, or any third party and the activity needs to be undertaken in order to use these
grant funds, this special condition must first be met. The activities covered by this special condition are:
a. New construction;
b. Minor renovation or remodeling of a property either (a) listed on or eligible for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places or (b) located within a lOO-year flood plain;
c. A renovation, lease, or any proposed use of a building or facility that will either (a) result in a change
in its basic prior use or (b) significantly change its size; and,
d. Implementation of a new program involving the use of chemicals other than chemicals that are (a)
purchased as an incidental component of a funded activity and (b) traditionally used, for example, in
office, household, recreational, or education enVironments.
Application of This Special Condition to Grantee's Existing Programs or Activities: For any of the
grantee's or its subgrantees' existing programs or activities that will be funded by these grant funds, the
grantee, upon specific request from BJA, agrees to cooperate with BJA in any preparation by BJA of a
national or program environmental assessment of that funded program or activity.
=r ~/2-
\ ._-.-- -------- I
Department of Justice I GRANT MANAGER'S MEMORANDUM, PT. I:
Office of Justice Programs I PROJECT SUMMARY I
, I
I I I
Bureau of Justice Assistance I
, Grant
!
I I
I PROJECT NUMBER
I PAGE I OF I
-- I 2006-DJ-BX-0304
This project is supported under P.L 109-108 I
I
I. STAFF CONTACT (Name & telephone numbcr) 2. PROJECT DIRECTOR (Name, address & telephone number) i
Jeffrey S. Felten-Green Jeanne Schroeder I
I (202) 5 14-8874 Admin Assistant I
I 33325 8th Ave South
P.O. Box 9718
I .. Federal Way,WA 98063-9718.
(253) 835-6703 I
! 3b. POMS CODE (SEE INSTRUCTIONS I
3a. TITLE OF THE PROGRAM I
FY 2006 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant. (JAG) Program ! ON REVERSE)
I ., Hi
I I I
I'. TInEO"ROJEcr I
MDC Project
5. NAME & ADDRESS OF GRANTEE 6. NAME & ADRESS OF SUBGRANTEE
City of Federal Way
33325 8th Ave South P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, W A 98063-9718
I
7. PROGRAM PERlOD 8. BUDGET PERlOD
FROM: 10/0]/2005 TO: 09130/2009 FROM: 10/01/2005 TO: 09/30/2009
9. AMOUNT OF AWARD 10. DATE OF AWARD
529,114 06/1 4/2006
II. SECOND YEAR'S BUDGET 12. SECOND YEAR'S BUDGET AMOUNT
13. THIRD YEAR'S BUDGET PERIOD 14. THIRD YEAR'S BUDGET AMOUNT I
IS. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (See inslnletion on reverse)
The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program (JAG) allows states, tribes, and local governments to support a broad range of
activities to prevent and control crime based on tbeir own local needs and conditions. Grant funds can be used for state and local initiatives,
technical assistance, training, personnel, equipment, supplies, contractual support, and infonnation systems for criminal justiee for anyone or
more of the following pUlpOsc areas: 1) law enforcement programs; 2) prosecution and court programs; 3) prevention and education programs; 4)
corrections and community corrections programs; 5) drug treatment programs; and 6) planning, evaluation, and technology improvement
programs.
OlP FORM 4000/2 (REV. 4-88)
"J'>-, ~
--
I The City of Federal Way will use the JAG funds to increase police officer.s access to public safety related data through broadband wireless -- --~-I
,
technology within the patrol vehicles. ,
I i
I
NCAlNCF I
I
I
I
I !
i i
!
I
I
, i
I
I
I
!
;
;, j
dl
I
I
I
i
I
J -/~
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18,2006 ITEM #: 5-d
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: THOMPSON PROPERTY PARK: AWARD BID
POLICY QUESTION: Should construction of Thompson Property Park be awarded to GMT, Inc., who submitted
the only bid on the project?
COMMIITEE:. PRPS MEETING DATE: 7/10/06
CATEGORY:
~ Consent 0 Ordinance 0 Public Hearing
0 Oty Council Business 0 Resolution 0 Other
STAFF REpORT By: B SANDERS DEPT: Parks, Recreation &
Cultural Services
Bids were opened on the Thompson Park project on June 28, 2006. GMT, Inc. ofKenmore submitted the only
bid. The amounts of the bid, including sales tax are:
Base Bid: $319,062.53
Alt. I-Tot Play Equipment: $ 28,304.32
Alt. 2-5-12 Year-Old Play Equipment: $ 56.505.28
TOTAL, all items: $403,872.13
These amounts are within a reasonable range of the cost estimate that was prepared in February 2006.
Available funds in the Thompson project account are approximately $305,000. The Madrona Park account has
about $30,000 remaining. If these funds are transferred to Thompson, this would enable the City to construct the
work in the Base Bid, which includes clearing and grading; drainage and irrigation; and trail, basketball court and
playground curb construction. In this scenario, the project budget would be:
Project Budget- $335,000.00
Base Bid: -- $319.062.53
5% Construction Contingency: $ 15,937.47
Thompson Park has also received a $15,000 Starbucks Neighborhood Park grant. This grant was written to help
with the purchase of playground equipment. If Alternate 1 (play equipment for toddlers) is selected, an
additional $13,304.32 plus a small contingency would be needed. One option to help fund Alternate 1 is to move
funds from the Annual Playground Renovation account. There is approximately $87,000 in the account at this
time. Transferring the needed amount would still leave a balance of $73,695.
Attachments: Thompson Park Concept Plan
Options Considered:
1. Award bid to GMT, Inc.
2. Transfer $30,000 in remaining funds from Madrona Park account to fund Base Bid.
3. Transfer $14,000 from Annual Playground Renovation account to fund Tot Play Equipment.
4. Do not award bid.
t:- ,
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staffbelieves this is a reasonable bid, given the current construction climate, and
recommends awarding the bid to GMT, Inc. Staff also recommends transferring funds to fully fund the base bid
and Alternate 1.
CITY MANAGER ApPROVAL: DIRECTOR ApPROVAL: ~ -
Conunittee COWICiI
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
OPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: HI mov rpproval to award the Thompson Park project to GMT, Inc. and to
transfer funds as specified above to fully fund the Base Bid and Alternate J. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
0 DENIED ISf reading
0 TABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION Enactment reading
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED - 02/0612006 RESOLUTION #
-r b r ()..l fnj u::t c..o~ :
~A-'S~ b-i J : 4 ?>L~, 01,2. ,,~
Al+. l : ~ 2e ( ?Olf. -32
~ :S47, "?lev. Bes
t==--2--
--------
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18,2006 ITEM#: 5-e
--.-.--..--.-.--.---------------------.-----...----.--------------.------.-....-.----.----..--.---.-----------.------.-----------..--
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
. CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: WIFI INTERNET SERVICE OPTIONS FOR FEDERAL WAY
POLICY QUESTION: Should the City continue FREE WiFi internet services in the city cen~er?
COMMITTEE: Finance, Human Services and Regional Affairs MEETING DATE: June 27,2006
CATEGORY:
~ Consent 0 Ordiuance 0 Public Hearing
0 City Council Business 0 Resolution 0 Other
_~TA_!!_~~PO!!_B~~ Mehdi Sa~!i, Inform~tion T~~~ology_M~~~~__ DEPT:_ Manag~I!!~nt _Se~i~~__._
ATTACHMENTS: Staff report dated June 23,2006.
OPTIONS CONSIDERED:
1. Continue the free service in the downtown and Silver Lake areas and expand the service in
downtown with remaining equipment.
2. Move the Silver Lake system and use the remaining equipment to expand the free WiFi service
. beyond downtown to the SR99 corridor (272nd to 336th), city parks, and city buildings/facilities. .
-.---------------------.--.---. --------.-.---------..---------------.---.----
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends
CITY MANAGER ApPROV AL: ~ DIRECTOR ApPROVAL: cln~L -
$u~e Council
ATION: Forward Optionato the ul 18, 20(>6 City
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "1 move approval of the staff recommendat n
business corridor and continue free WiFi services."
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACfION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 T ABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACfION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
REVISED - 0210612006
,~ Federal Way
STAFF REPORT
Date: June 23, 2006
To: Finance, Human Services and Regional Affairs Committee
From: Iwen Wang, Management Services Director ~
Via: Derek Matheson, Interim City Manager \ \,U~ tU4K....
Subject: WiFi Project Update
BACKGROUND
In 2005 Council approved a "proof of concept" pilot project to determine the viability of providing citywide
wireless broadband internet services. The pilot project is funded with $150,000 in public safety wireless access
grants and $250,000 in city funds.
Staff completed installation of the WiPi network in two areas in the city (downtown core and Silver
Lake) in January of 2006. Since then the network has since been available to the public and Public
Safety use. The system is comprised of over 4.5 miles of fiber line, 16 wireless backhaul
transmitter/receivers and 19 WiPi access points (AP) in the Silver Lake area, two WiPi Panels, two APs
downtown, and two wireless backhaul transmitter/receivers downtown. The infrastructure covers a 1.2
square mile area, including The Commons. At the same time, staff also connected DBC, City Hall, and
Police Officers stationed in The Commons, and set up two networks: one secure network for Public.
Safety use and a separate network and website for public use. One remaining WiPi panel and several
APs are available for use.
Total cost of the system to date is.around $360K:
. actual WiPi hardware and access software costs - approximately $185K
. fiber optic cables to the two pilot areas - $75K
. contract installation - $40K
. staffing - $25K
. antenna site leases - $5K
. contract and consulting services - $30K
. Remaining Balance - $40K
SYSTEM CAP ABILITIES AND LIMIT A TlONS
The theoretical capacity is 1.5 MBPS access speed per user which is faster than DSL and cellular
services but slower than Comcast service for public users; and 11 MBPS for Public Safety personnel.
A total of 3,400 login IDs were issued to 2,200 one-time "visitor" users and 1,200 residentiallbusiness-
type users. Since login IDs have preset expiration times, these numbers include return users, or users
who forgot their login IDs. There is an average of 15 users on the network at any given time between 8
AM and 8 PM. Not surprisingly, more consistent returning users exist in the Silver Lake area than in
the downtown.
Our online surveys show residential users may- be willing to pay anywhere from $5 to $25 per month
for the service, while visiting users may be willing to pay anywhere from $2 to $8 for a day or week of
service. However, for the most part, users are requesting free service. In addition, residential users are
FHSRAC June 27, 2006
E-2
-~-----------
interested in more complete internet services besides basic access like e-mail, web space, security, spam
control and the like.
There are substantial limitations of 802.11 alb/g WiFi networks. Sharing frequencies with many other
household devices causes interference while interfering with exiting wireless networks in many homes.
Its radio output power is limited to one watt, thereby providing limited penetration through walls,
buildings, trees, and other obstacles. Also, due to the low power output, the signal strength (speed)
drops rapidly as it moves away from the access point.
Finally, the system's reliability is a concern. For the most part, the equipment is quite reliable and has
limited glitches. However, in order to deliver the glitch free zero (or near zero) downtime services
expected of a fee-based, commercial-grade system, we will need to provide much higher levels of
customer service than our staff can currently support.
FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
The pilot project provided a very good indicator of what is needed for a successful WiFi system~ We
believe it is cost prohibitive to expand the system city-wide. Unlike some early adopters of WiFi
technology, the City of Federal Way owns very limited infrastructure needed for the system such as
fiber optic cable, conduits, power & light poles, and high buildings/structures. Therefore, we must
build all the elements or lease the necessary facilities from others. Another limitation in the
. deployment and maintenance is the lack of certified electrical workers and equipment. to perform
construction/installation work. These factors substantially increase the capital and maintenance costs.
During the pilot period, all users were routed through the City's network, which cannot be used for
commercial purposes. Therefore, in order to provide retail internet services, we must also purchase a
large bandwidth of access to internet. This would include again both capital and on-going costs.
As mentioned earlier, most fee paying customers want more than basic internet access, including e-
mail, web space, parental control, spain filters etc. which are typically offered by most internet service
providers. Unfortunately, the cost of establishing a system to provide these services would be very
high; contracting opportunities for the services are limited and expensive.
Given the current usage of the system and the response from the surveys, it is highly unlikely the
system can generate enough revenue to offset on-going operating costs, let alone recovering the initial
capital investment.
OPTIONS
Based on these findings, following are two options staff believes Council should consider:
1. Continue the free service in the downtown and Silver Lake areas using the remaining budget and
equipment to expand downtown.
Cost: One time costs = $25,000 (from existing funding)
M&O cost = $10 - $15k/yr which would require ongoing funding.
Pros: . Economic development advantages in downtown
. Minimum M&O costs
FHSRAC June 27, 2006 ,
E-3
Cons: . Limited to only city center core and one residential area
. Limited Public Safety application
2. Move the Silver Lake system and use the remaining equipment to expand the free WiFi service
beyond downtown to the SR99 Corridor (272nd to 336th), city parks, and city buildings/facilities.
Cost: One time costs = $35,000 (from existing funding)
M&O cost = $15 - $20k/yr which would require ongoing funding.
Pros: . Focus on commercial corridor and maximize economic development benefit
. Free WiFi in major city facilities
. Limited or no residential service (so no question about fairness)
. More public safety application potential (wireless camera, etc. on SR99)
Cons: . Coverage limited to business area
. Slightly higher M&O cost
FHSRAC June 27 J 2006
E-4
,.
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 3"v-. \ 'l \ ~ I 'Z..oo ls. ITEM #: 5-f
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: French Lake Off-leash dog Park
POLICY QUESTION: Should French Lake Park become a permanent off-leash dog park?
COMMITTEE: PRPS Committee MEETING DATE: July 10,2006
CATEGORY:
~ Consent 0 Ordinance D. Public Hearing
0 City Council Business 0 Resolution 0 Other
STAFF REpORT By: Donna Hanson DEPT: Parks and Recreation
Attachments: Staff report and Minutes from the June 1, 2006 Parks Commission Meeting.
Options Considered:
Option 1: Staff recommended to the Parks Commission, an additional 1-2 year temporary designation as an off-
leash dog park in French Lake Park in order to 1) research the pros and cons of other possible sites, 2)
determine associated cos~s for improvements to French Lake Park or other possible locations, and 3)
establish the long term feasibility for continued use of the 4.68 acres belonging to Lakehaven Utility
District.
Option 2: After public testimony from off-leash park users who did not want to invest time and money
in another temporary timeframe, the Parks Commission voted to establish French Lake Park as-ac(ff:.'L..I.J
peq:BillHJm off-leash dog park.
Option 3: Remove the "temporary" designation and continue current use and maintenance levels of French Lake
Park as an off-leash dog park in order to encourage park users to invest time and money. Ownership or a long
term use agreement for the 4.68 acres belonging to Lakehaven Utility District and a long-term plan for an off-
leash facility with estimated costs will be required before City funding will be considered for capitol
improvements.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports an off-leash dog park within the City and recommended option 1 to
the Parks Commission in order to provide more time for a decision that will have long term planning and fmancial
impacts. If Co~ci1 wishes to address the concerns of the off-leash dog park users who do not want to invest time
and money in a temporary park, option 3 removes the temporary status and still assures fiscal responsibility on the
part of the City until long term use and capitol ing requirements are established.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~ DIRECfOR ApPROVAL: &!:ttee
Committee
COMMITI'EE RECOMMENDATION:
'16 -
Il- \
---------
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "/ move approval of option 7- and forward to Full Council on July 18,
2006".
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
0 DENIED 1ST reading
0 T ABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACI'ION Enactment reading
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED - 02106f2006 RESOLUTION #
~-1-
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PARKS COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 1,2006
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: B Sanders, Park Planning & Development Coordinator
SUBJECT: French Lake Park-One year review
Background
After public testimony in June of 2005, the Parks, Recreation, Human Services, & ,Public Safety
Committee asked the Parks and Recreation Commission to monitor an off-leash dog facility for
one year at French Lake Park. Staff recommended using the planning process for the Parks,
Recreation and Open Space Plan Update as an opportunity to gather public input to determine the
demand for an off-leash facility.
The Park Plan Update is now in the final stages of adoption after three months of public input.
fuformation from the Stakeholder Group, surveys, and open houses, as well as observations at
French Lake Park, show that there is a strong desire and need for an off-leash dog park in Federal
Way. There have been few complaints from neighbors or the parle The owners of dogs using
French Lake Park have taken an interest in maintenance and have worked with the Parks
Department on improvements.
This trial has been successful based on public input and care and use of the park. Additional
analysis needs to be completed in the following areas: 1) research the pros and cons of other
possible sites, 2) determine associated costs for improvements to French Lake Park or other
possible locations, and 3) establish the long term feasibility for continued use ofthe 4.68 acres
belonging to Lakehaven Utility District.
Staff recommendation
Allow off-leash use of French Lake Park to continue for 1-2 years so that the City can
systematically evaluate potential sites and costs associated with developing a long-term off-leash
dog park.
Commission recommendation
v ),U' '" < , > I
I t\<~
MINUTES
Chair Purdom called the meeting to order at 6: I 0 p.m.
Present: Chair C.T. Purdom, Vice Chair George Pfeiffer, Don Dennis, Ade Bright, Joel Howitt, Tom Medhurst, Marie
Sciacqua, Fred Konkell, Carol Otto and Helen Stanwell. Excused: Cindy Dodge. Unexcused: David Talcott.
Staff: PRCS Director Donna Hanson, Parks and Facilities Manager Steve Ikerd, City Attorney Pat Richardson, Interim
City Manager Derek Matheson and Administrative Assistant Peg Wright. .....:'.' .....
Guests: Jeanne Burbidge, council member.
Dennis moved: Pfeiffer seconded motion to approve the May Parks and Recreation Commission meeting minutes as
written. Motion passed unanimously.
Pfeiffer moved: Dennis seconded motion to move V. #B. Thompson Property Name to III #B under Commission Business.
Motion passed unanimously.
PUBLIC FORUM
Carolyn Owens. Joanne Hugill. Elizabeth Conner. MarvAnn Gates. Jerry Britt. Frank Misner. Sally Hurst. Davina
Mackenzie. Angie Zmiiewski. Harold Hurst. Jerrie Loties. Kevin Morris and Dave Kaplan spoke in support of designating
French Lake Park as the official Off Leash Dog Park in Federal Way.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
French Lake Off-Leash Dog Park - Director Hanson reiterated that there are no funds designated for French Lake Park-
signage, fencing, pond repair, turfrepair, repair to the bridge over the pond, etc. Dog owners voiced concern on the
irrigation system and how it operated with Director Hanson stating the irrigation is controlled by a Lakehaven system.
Commissioners discussed several issues - need more time to assess, a more cooperative effort with the City being more
decisive, support and direction from staff with the Volunteer group and the long-term feasibility with Lakehaven owning
part of property. Dennis moved: Bright seconded motion to forward a recommendation to the Council Committee to
designate French Lake Park as the official Off-Leash Dog Park in Federal Way. Motion carried with one abstention
(Pfeiffer).
Thompson Property Name - Council member Burbidge said the name of Cascade Park was stalled at the council committee
level when recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission last year. She said while reviewing a grant application
and on a recent visit to this property, she noticed several red cedar trees. There are a few cedars now with several
additional red cedar trees to be planted during property development. She suggested Cedarwood, Cedar Grove or Cedar
Park for consideration. Dennis moved to name the property Cedar Park. Discussion followed by commissioners on a
preferred choice to recommend to the council committee. Howitt amended the motion to add Grove to the name - Cedar
Grove Park - with Konkell seconding the amendment Dennis moved to forward the recommendation of Cedar Grove Park
to the Council Committee with a second by Pfeiffer. Motion carried unanimously.
STAFF REPORTS
Community Center SUDDOrt Drive - Sciacqua reported on the support drive for the Community Center. She said they are
doing a raffle, collecting items from local businesses and will start selling the tickets at the Red, White and Blue Festival
and other City events until the end of August. The Swimathon at Kenneth Jones Pool starts Saturday with twenty
swinuners participating. The next meeting of the committee will be held at City Hall on June 22,2006. The current
pledges/donations are at $30,000.
\\~~
~
-.-
Parks and Recreation Commission. June 1. 2006 Pal!e 2
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
Conununity Center ConstructionUodate - Director Hanson and the commission went on a tour of the construction site
prior to the meeting. Hanson reported that it is about three weeks behind schedule but within budget and contingency.
2006 Business Plan - Document in packet is for review and informational only. Director Hanson said the Special Event
Permit process is going well this year and she is comfortable leaving it and reviewing at a later time.
Chair Purdom will attend the Council Committee meeting on June 12, 2006. PRCS has two items on the agenda.
PENDING
Lake Killarney
NEXT MEETING/AGENDA ITEMS
Conununity Center Construction Update Community Center Support Drive
RWB/Staff Involvement
ADJOURNMENT
Chair Purdom adjourned the meeting at 7:35 p.m
NEXT MEETING IS AUGUST 3.. 2006
f\-5
'~\'-\ \~ Z- 0.1 5-g
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: I. oU'-f ITEM #:
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: NAMING THOMPSON PROPERTY - CEDAR GROVE P.ARK
POLICY QUESTION:
Should the Thompson Property, which will be developed as a park this year, be named "Cedar Grove Park?"
COMMITTEE: PARKS RECREATION AND PUBLIC SAFETY MEETING DATE: .r.,
CATEGORY:
rgJ Consent Ordinance D Public Hearing
D City Council Business D Resolution D Other
STAFF REpORT BY: Betty Sanders DEPT: Parks and Recreation
Attachments: Minutes from the June 1, 2006 Parks Commission Meeting
Options Considered: Many other names were considered, but the top three names considered by the Parks
Commission were 1) Cascade Park, 2) Colonial Park, 3) and Sunset Park. PRHSPS Council Committee did not
take action on these proposed names at their December meeting. After touring the site and reviewing the
proposed development plans for the site, it was determined that several Cedar trees currently exist on the
property and the plans call for many more to be planted during development. The name "Cedar Grove Park" was
proposed at the Parks Commission regular meeting on June 1, 2006. This name complies with the ''natural
features" criteria in the Resolution establishing the policy for naming parks in the City. The Commission voted
unanimously to recommend Cedar Grove Park to the Council Committee.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staffbelieves this is an appropriate name for the site and concurs with the Parks
Commission recommendation
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: ,::>::r::.
Committee
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
ROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move Offroval of Cedar Grove Park as the official park name for the
Thompson Property located at 2228 S. 333" St and to forward this motion for the consent agenda at the next
Regular Council meeting. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
0 DENIED 1ST reading
0 TABLEDIDEFERREDlNO ACfION Enactment reading
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED - 0210612006 RFSOLUTION #
c-\
MINUTES
Chair Purdom called the meeting to order at 6: I 0 p.m.
Present: Chair C.T. Purdom, Vice Chair George Pfeiffer, Don Dennis, Ade Bright, Joel Howitt, Tom Medhurst, Marie
Sciacqua, Fred Konkell, Carol Otto and Helen Stanwell. Excused: Cindy Dodge. Unexcused: David Talcott.
Staff: PRCS Director Donna Hanson, Parks and Facilities Manager Steve Ikerd, City Attorney Pat RichlU:dson,-Interim
City Manager Derek Matheson and Administrative Assistant Peg Wright.
Guests: Jeanne Burbidge, council member.
Dennis moved: Pfeiffer seconded motion to approve the May Parks and Recreation Commission meeting minutes as
written. Motion passed unanimously.
Pfeiffer moved: Dennis seconded motion to move V. #B. Thompson Property Name to III. #B under Commission Business.
Motion passed unanimously.
PUBLIC FORUM
Carolyn Owens. Joanne Hufrill. Elizabeth Conner. MaryAnn Gates. Jerry Britt. Frank Misner. Sally Hurst. Davina
Mackenzie. Angie Zmijewski. Harold Hurst. Jerrie Loties. Kevin Morris and Dave Kal'lan spoke in support of designating
French Lake Park as the official Off Leash Dog Park in Federal Way.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
French Lake Off-Leash Dog Park - Director Hanson reiterated that there are no funds designated for French Lake Park-
signage, fencing, pond repair, turf repair, repair to the bridge over the pond, etc. Dog owners voiced concern on the
irrigation system and how it operated with Director Hanson stating the irrigation is controlled by a Lakehaven system.
Commissioners discussed several issues - need more time to assess, a more cooperative effort with the City being more
decisive, support and direction from staff with the Volunteer group and the long-term feasibility with Lakehaven owning
part of property. Dennis moved: Bright seconded motion to forward a recommendation to the Council Conunittee to
designate French Lake Park as the official Off-Leash Dog Park in Federal Way. Motion carried with one abstention
(pfeiffer).
ThoIDDson PropertY Name - Council member Burbidge said the name of Cascade Park was stalled at the council committee
level when recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission last year. She said while reviewing a grant application
and on a recent visit to this property, she noticed several red cedar trees. There are a few cedars now with several
additional red cedar trees to be planted during property development. She suggested Cedarwood, Cedar Grove or Cedar
Park for consideration. Dennis moved to name the property Cedar Park. Discussion followed by commissioners on a
preferred choice to recommend to the council committee. Howitt amended the motion to add Grove to the name - Cedar
Grove Park - with Konkell seconding the amendment. Dennis moved to forward the recommendation of Cedar Grove Park
to the Council Committee with a second by Pfeiffer. Motion carried unanimously.
STAFF REPORTS
Community Center SUP{lOrt Drive - Sciacqua reported on the support drive for the Community Center. She said they are
doing a raffle, collecting items from local businesses and will start selling the tickets at the Red, White and Blue Festival
and other City events until the end of August. The Swimathon at Kenneth Jones Pool starts Saturday with twenty
swimmers participating. The next meeting of the committee will be held at City Hall on June 22, 2006. The current
pledges/donations are at $30,000.
&7-
-- --------------------
Parks and Recreation Commission. June 1. 2006 Paee 2
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
Community Center Construction Uvdate - Director Hanson and the commission went on a tour of the construction site
prior to the meeting. Hanson reported that it is about three weeks behind schedule but within budget and contingency.
2006 Business Plan - Document in packet is for review and informational only. Director Hanson said the Special Event
Permit process is going well this year and she is comfortable leaving it and reviewing at a later time.
Chair Purdom will attend the Council Committee meeting on June 12, 2006. PRCS has two items on the agenda.
PENDING
Lake Kjllarney
NEXT MEETING/AGENDA ITEMS
Community Center Construction Update Community Center Support Drive
RWB/StaffInvolvement
ADJOURNMENT
Chair Purdom adjourned the meeting at 7:35 p.m.
NEXT MEETING IS AUGUST 3" 2006
G-~
-----------------
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18,2006 ITEM #: 5-h
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: CABINS PARK PHASE II: PARKING LOT - REJECT BID AND AUTHORIZE TO RE-BID IN
SMALLER PACKAGES
POLICY QUESTION: Should the single bid received for Cabins Park, which is substantially more than the
budget for the project, be rejected? If so, should staffbe directed to break the design into smaller packages and
bid them individually from the Small Works Roster?
COMMITTEE: PRPS MEETING DATE: July 10, 2006
CATEGORY:
lZJ Consent D Ordinance D Public Hearing
D City Council Business D Resolution D Other
STAFF REpORT By: B SANDERS DEPT: PRCS
One bid was received for the Cabins Park Parking Lot project at the bid opening on June 12, 2006. The bid was
from A-I Landscaping and Construction, Inc., with a base bid of $313,344.00. The plan set included one
alternate, for Perco-Crete sidewalk, and A-I submitted a bid of $22,848.00 for this alternate. This would bring
the total project cost of this bid to $336,192 if the alternate were selected. (perco-Crete is the smooth surfaced
type of pervious concrete, compared to the standard pervious concrete, which resembles Rice Krispie treats.)
The budget for the construction portion of this project is approximately $225,000, and the engineer's cost
estimate prepared in August 2005 was approximately $150,000. Staff believes that the large variance between
the cost estimate and the bid is due to a very busy construction industry and very volatile prices for some
materials such as concrete and asphalt.
Public Works, Parks and Planning staffs have coordinated a strategy for moving forward to get this project
constructed. Staff recormnends dividing the project into several smaller components, and bidding these
individually from the Small Works Roster. In this way, the City would act as a general contractor, similar to the
way the City Hall construction was managed. The components that are being considered are:
1. Grading and drainage
2. Concrete work
3. Utilities for future restroom
4. Landscaping
At a minimum, staff believes that items one and two can be completed this year, making the parking lot usable,
and expending the $104,000 in funds from the State of Washington.
Attachments: None
Options Considered:
1. Reject the bid received from A-I Landscaping, Inc.
2. Re-bid the project in smaller components.
f-\
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends to reject the bid from A-I Landscaping and proceed with re-
bidding the individual components ofthe project.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: sr:.
Committee
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
<13 \
Committee Chair
PR POSED COUNCll.. MOTION: "] move a oval of rejecting the single bid from A-I Landscaping, and direct
staff to re-bid the project in smaller components, using the Small Works Roster."
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
0 DENIED 1 5T reading
0 T ABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION Enactment reading
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED - 0210612006 RESOLUTION #
E-l-
~------------ ----
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18, 2006 ITEM #: 5-j
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: CABINS PARK: PSE EASEMENT
POLICY QUESTION: Should the City enter into an agreement with Puget Sound Energy for an ingress/egress
easement across PSE property to construct the improvements at Cabins Park?
COMMITTEE: PRPS MEETING DATE: July 10,2006
CATEGORY:
[gI Consent D Ordinance D Public Hearing
D City Council Business D Resolution D Other
STAFF REpORT By: B SANDERS DEPT: Parks, Rec. & CuI. Services
The existing asphalt drive that currently serves the trailhead at West Hylebos Park and the homes south of Cabins
Park is on PSE property. The first 70 feet of this drive will be reconstructed as part of the parking lot project at
Cabins Park. To perform this construction it is necessary to have an easement acroSS the PSE property. PSE is
requesting $1000 for this easement.
Attachments: None
Options Considered:
1. Authorize City Manager to sign an IngresslEgress Easement with PSE.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the easement with PSE be approved, so that construction at
Cabins Park can proceed.
CITY MANAGER MPROV AL: DIRECTOR ApPROVAL: 5I:. .
Committee
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
~p.J~ ~
Committee Chair Committ e Member
ROPOSED COUNCn.. MOTION: "l move approval of entering into an agreement with Puget Sound Energy for
an lngress/Egress Easement for construction of a parking lot at Cabins Park. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACI'ION:
0 APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
0 DENIED 1 ST reading
0 TABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION Enactment reading
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED - 0210612006 RESOLUTION #
G-\
-----------------
.~Q!!~~!_~__~E_!!~<?_~~!E~_~~!!~!~~. 200~_____________________._____._____.____~~_~~____._~=~__
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: 2007-2012 Transportation Improvement Program - Public Hearing & Adoption
POLICY QUESTION: Should the City CounCil approve the resolution to adopt the proposed 2007 - 2012
Transportation hnprovement Plan?
COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: June 19,2006
CATEGORY:
a: Consent 0 Ordinance [8] Public Hearing
o City Council Business )(r Resolution 0 Other
STAFF ~P<?.RT By: Rick Perez, P.E., City Traffic Engineer DEPT: Public Works
Attachments: LUTC memo on Adopting the TIP Resolution
The Resolution Adopting the TIP for 2007~2012
Options Considered:
l.Approve the resolution adopting the proposed 2007 - 2012 Transportation Improvement Plan
2. Deny approval.
--------------_._-------_.__._----~._--------_.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize Option 1 to approve the resolution adopting the proposed 2007 - 2012
Transportation hnprovement Plan.
CITY MANAGER ApPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: tJ4tI\
ConuniUee Council
COMMITTEE OMMENDA TlON: Forward Option 1 to the July 18lb, 2006 City C:ouncil C~sent Agenda.
. .... ~-a
~ ' --- /t/,
Eric ~on. M:W ,'/ ,
P SED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of Option I, to approve the resolution adopting the
proposed 2007 - 20/2 Transportation Improvement Plan. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
o AP.PROVED COUNCIL BILL #
o DENIED In reading
o TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
o MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED - 02/0612006 RESOLUTION #
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 19, 2006
TO: Land Use and Transportation commi~
VIA: Derek Matheson, Interim City Manag
FROM: Rick Perez, P.E., City Traffic Engineer PI(
SUBJECT: 1007-1011 Transportation Improvement Plan
BACKGROUND:
In accordance with the requirements of Chapters 35.77 and 47.26 of the Revised Code of Washington, the City of
Federal Way adopted its original TlP and ASIP on July 23, 1991. The City is also required to adopt a revised TIP
and ASlP on an annual basis reflecting the City's current and future street and arterial needs. These plans identifY
capital projects that the City intends to construct over the next six years. In order to be eligible for grant funding,
projects are required to be listed in the City's TIP.
The City is required to hold a minimum of one public hearing on the revised plan, which is proposed for the July
18,2006 City Council meeting. Once the revised plans have been adopted by Resolution, a copy of the respective
plans must be filed with the Washington State Secretary of Transportation and the Washington State
Transportation Improvement Board.
Revised Plan:
Attached for your review and comment are the proposed 2007-2012 TlP and ASlP (Exhibit A), a location map
(Exhibit B), and a draft resolution for adoption (Exhibit C). The six-year TIP and ASlP respond to the Growth
Management Act concurrency requirements as well as other emerging needs. Projects are selected based on
criteria adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan TP81, which reads, "Prioritize transportation projects
considering concurrency, safety, support for non-SOY modes, environmental impacts, and cost effectiveness:'
The scoring criteria as established for Transportation TlP/ClP Prioritization nmked each project. Staff also
reviewed and analyzed available grant-eligible programs suitable for project programming.
The proposed'plan does not signi~cantly differ from the previous year's plan; changes should be noted as
completed projects and updated costs to current year 2007. No new projects are being proposed.
Completed Projects:
. S 336th St @ 1 sl Way S, added a westbound right-turn lane, provided signal modifications, and extended
the southbound left-turn lane.
. S 336th St @ 91h Ave S, provided signal modifications.
. 21 Sl Ave S: S 3181h St - S 320th St, Extended the City Center grid road to the new Sound Transit Station.
. Westway Neighborhood, installed up to 22 new street lights in the Westway neighborhood to address a
crime prevention program in partnership with the City's Public Safety Team.
-- -
. Proiects with Design Complete in 2006
. S 320tb St @ 1st Ave S, adds a second northbound and westbound left-turn lanes, a new westbound right
turn lane, and widens 1st Ave S to five lanes to S 316tb St.
. SR99 ROV Lanes Phase 3: S 284tll St - SR 509, adds ROV lanes, a second southbound left-turn lane at S
288tb St, installs raised medians, a new signal at SR 509 @ Redondo Way with interconnect to 11th PI S.
. 21st Ave SW I SW 357111 St: SW 356tb St - 22nd Ave SW, extends a two lane collector and provides signal
modifications.
. SR 18 @ SR 161, adds eastbound and westbound right-turn lanes, a third westbound left-turn lane, a second
north right-turn lane, and adds a third lane on SR 161 southbound to S 3520d St.
,
-----
OOO~.~O~~N~N~~ON~M~~~~O~~m ~M~ N
O~O.N~Q'~~M~~M~NO~~M.~~~M~~ ~~~ ~
~~~OOMN~m~.v~O~NmM~~~~M ~~ M~C N
_MN~~~~~~~~ r ~rr~ ~~~~ ~~ _ ~ ~
Jll ... Jll ...
~ ~
~ 0 M= m~ 0 ~
~ ~ l;l ~ ~::: :::
~ . ~ ~. ~~; ~
'" '"
-
o M ~ N ~ OmO~N! MM ~
o m ~ ~ = M~~Mm ~~ ~
o ~ ~ ~ ~~M 0 ~~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 0
... ... "I"" N
o 0
'" '"
-
g ~ ~g.~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 ~
~ - ~~~ N 0.(") ~ ~ ~~ ~
Q M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M 0 ~
't""' N... N
.0 We
~'" ~'"
c: c:
.. "
~ ~ ~
o 0 0 ~ m ~ ~~ w ...0 ..- ... N
= ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~$ ~ ~= ~ ~ ;
*~ N ~ ~ ~~~ ~
sg ~sg ...
J!l'" J!l'"
o 0
9 0
o 0.. f-
~ 0 M~ 0 ~ N: 0 N
~ ~~ ~.'S_ ~_ ~_ ~2 ~
~~N ~v ~ M N~G N
.0 NClO N
ell 0 ell 0
>'" >'"
~
g :~ g ~~, ~ 0 ~
N MI() 0 Ii) 'Iit..- N..'1
~ ~ N ~~ M ~ M
o .... 0 -
o 0
'" '"
~
~~~g ~. ~ : 0:
M'lIIt...,... M . "1"""
... .,.: ..: "::g ,.:
g 0
'" '"
o 0 0 Ie;
If 0 0 If :Jil
C'O Lt) '" C'IS
~ ~
o 0
= =
o 0
~ ~
e e
0.. 0..
~
CI)
'" ii:
~ =
g B
~ ~
o c:
~ c:
a: @ Zi5
~ s ~
I;;;. c: c
.- C\I
Z ~ ~
~ ~ M
ll,. ~ CI)
CI) 0
~ ~ ;;:;
w S CI)
:E 0 ~
~ ~ m
o 'tl _ 0::
0:: Cl> CI) CJ)
0.. 0::0= c:
~ @)~~ 0
Z mWM ~
o g=CI) ~
~ ~gs ~
~ @)I~ ;
~ l~~ ~ e
In c: c:n c::: Q) Q) 0
z< :8 ... 'w =.s !5 lij c: :z:l 0
a..! Q.~C(/J ~ - J! Q.;e
~ l~ Ej~~ I I E l~
=: 0() l!iCP< E ..!. ~ :~
I! ~~ ~EE~ a ~ ~ 09
o U 0,,_ := 'C - a.
.s ~ is: c: iii en ~ E
::: 'tl'!!!.e~ ~'" z > ';;
Cl> c:~=~ ~~ -g -g -s
8 6.S~u) ~]! N C Q')N If)
: E~5~ ~E t g ~! ~ i
>~e~~~ ~a. '" ~ ~o 0 I
eCo...cQ')E '.s::.:; -.- _c UJ
Q.!2oco~:j ~~.~co (/) E E C'CI,2 ~ ~
.~E~~oo! ~~i~ g ~ i ~~ ~ ~
~ S~.~@~j~g~g~ ~ i _~ .~i ~ ~ &
~ ~~I.~~:jg~~~ ~~m t :!~~ ~:
~ ~~"'~'">E-W~Cl> 'tl-.~ ~ c:--- ~ n
o ~en~--> i'tl~8 o~ Cl> '"=]$ ~ ~
~ lijCJ)~~~~~E~~'"en!EI I ~~E' < ~
D.. -"O'---~="tJ .ij)Q)3:<'G"T,J. .cuU "'0 () (/)
~ s~~=~~~Q)0Cl>"'O~ CQ)~ ~~Q)~Q)~ Q ~
oc( c:. 0_ ~ .!l - en .~ c: 'm c.. cti 2'.~ ~ ~ c .2i =8 (J) .~ ~ w E
~ ~~~enenEze'"~Ew~emc:~'" Cl>e~ ~ e.
~ c:~~wz~~-i~~~~=i~cp~~~=cp Cl> 0:: <c
o iEi'tl'tlIW~~nlijc:U~~Ellijt~~~ lij 0..... OECl>
> - - -c r: _ .,.. +r Q) ._ co Q) c +r ::I - _ +iI C w_ _ <(
c ~ en ~ N~ -~-_" ,4) .=: :c 15 ~ - 15 .-. :c +r qf E .g ~ .-. vi ~ e en 0 - ~
UJ =: en en ti en CD " E G Q) -= 4) Q,. -f/) (I)' CD :if OJ ~
~~=CPcP -cp~~ESCl>~~.C:~CPSCPC:~~C: ~ ~l
~en~lijlij~2lijenc:'tl~c:lijenen~~c:ulij~o~~ 0 ~E
~CJ)M--Z=-CJ)~CPCl>'"-~~~Cl~Cl>-~IECl~ z ~,-
Zi5 'tl CJ) 0> >0 .'tl en 0> ~ '" '~ :;; ~ >0 . ..s.C: M g 0> .s III 'C .s ~ lii
c: c: c: > :> 'tl c: 'tl en en en'tl 8 ::. !Xl '" 'tl
gN~~~N>~>C:=NC:~WW~Zc:...~~~CJ)~ ~3
"''tl'tl'tl~'tl'tl'tl'tlCPJll'tlCP'tl'tl'tl'tl'tlCP~'tl~~'tl'tl ~o
Cl>~5'tl'tl'tl'tl'tl'tlX"''tlX'tl'tl'tl5'tlX-~5''''tl5 "'~
o<><<<<<~w~<w<<<~<ws~>s<~ ~CJ)
~
CJ) ~
~ CI)
< ~
~ c( ~
~ ~ ~~ ~
~ ... N= ~
a:::: o. N
c en ~_ u; M en ~ g -e
:8 Zi5 ~ ~C!,' ~ ~ :; .t ~
~ = ,~ "'''' '" 0.. OCl)_o.. CJ) 8
0.... ~ MO N,f; 0 ~CJ) ~
..J '" ~ ~~ CJ)CI) ij5 ..J>~j;j III i
N CI) Cl)a:::: (1)1 N <-= 0 _
CI)~ '" CI) >'tl ~~ a. 0 m
NM....~~ '" ~ ~~ ~ ~~<~~ Zi5 ~M~ ~ X
CPCPcP - 0:: CJ) CI) w wCJ)=cPCl) ~ NCJ) 0 =
",,,,,,,cPCJ) CI) = CJ)=CP ~CJ)~Cl>",~CPCJ)~~ 'i w 'tl
~~~gJCJ)l(J) 'U)"ooQ)f'o..:3 O)OO::Q)<<<>I~~Q).~ W';"'N 0'" 5
~ ~ CJ)~"" >~.c: CI)>CJ) CJ) >.e ~CJ).c ..
o..Q..a..~Q)>U5cp>(f)=<(MCl. V) 1<( Ie;; :n~<(C"') - >1:J 0 << J!3
"'~"'",>< <~"'=>'" ~"'="'~CP.~~~o.. <c:M 0.. 0
~~~~<.=~.CJ)Ro;~~CJ)",,,,"'N~::BCJ)j;j =g~..J *
8,,8tll=~m~~_CI)N_,"~@)O::NO::@)- ""N-= ON'" < c;
<<<~"'@)M~@)~~@)~~~_CI)@)~_"'~_I~~~ NCJ)g ~ a.
.........>~ CI)~ CJ)~ >CI)CJ)~ _CJ).. wl~>o Z 0.. 'tl
...OlllZi5@CJ)Zi5cpCl)Zi5:0@=ftZi5ft~Zi5~=Zi5=_ Zi5~_ ~ I
~~~~j~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~j !~j ~ ~
< ~~~O::~M~MM~-M:O::O::~MMM~M~~M~= M-= ~ 0..
~ ()()()CJ)CJ)CI)CJ)CJ)CJ)~:CJ)"'CJ)CJ)CI)CI)CJ)CJ)CJ)CI)~CJ)CI)lIl~ CJ):ft ~ ~~
5!:! Q. a. ~~
~ "~"~O"'M.~~~~mO"''''M.~~~~mO~'''M ..O.~ =N
~ ~=~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~NNNN ~-NN a~
c ~ ~
.~ ~~
>-. - c ro ~g
mea' _ ~ :> ;:~
SO"" ~ _ ~ --jz E ::: g~
-- c: ~ ~ K _ ~ m ~ 5.
m 10 CD e ~ E III ~ -ge
~N ..., E ~ ~ :;; 8 ,. g CD '~:l:!
(J) Ii. - ~ G> 0 >- 0> ~ a. a.
"'C -r- 0 ~n c: ~,~ N ~- <( "'" E~
(J) 0 - ,g - .8 ~ _00 3:0 CD 8"',
LL N Q. 0> ~ .g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~R : LL. ~ .; I
- · (J) . ~ 'E c a; il5Si:;J, ~~ ,!! a.e .
- ..... 0 0 (i l1..oo )(_('1) a.
00 ...... c a. ~ .E 0 Z 0 '0 ~ ~ ~ ~ :; E': ,I
'>. ~ G> II a. :?;o<'> -0 <'> ,- I
:E::- 0 Ii.. E C) . ~ ,-<,>0 411~ .!!-o ;
() N ~ _ j ..:; O<,>a..lL~ 0 Flil i
I
$ -,~ .. - '
! I. i . (). ",-::"'1 ' ' no i
J; . """~~ 0"'. ~' i
i (.,,,~~. ~'?} I
,. }/ "",,\~l" e 1
, .': \, I!
t; - ~ '
ie j 1--------, ,. - -, - !
---~ 1 61 ,--, ~ 1 . I
!l, 5 ";. ", '>;" ~.. .. J
1."... ~'-""'-'''' T~~G~- - C-,.- B 1=--::-, \ ~: --", -.j;:.'\l\l I~/~,./l
"f'... - =",. . .-- ,'~_\_; '~\ J r,
>-- ',._-~> ~ I """,. '. .~ '. , '.'
-r..=--.' :""-'l"f'.~f'.Q'" J - , - "~~ 93,.. . : /931\"""'Z.._.-........J--c:---:
! __ .~.. . - - "!!~i1l"" . \ . I .
I dI fa. -,; . - ,!O t d I I
~ 6: , ~ '~P9Ll' -L ~, / ..., i . ,- ~:, ',:..:."V'~ J ~~V :
r. :Ii ~ c' --::lii ~ ' ',.'- ,- l ~ft'- I
T--.. ~.... :i ~~; ~ ~ Ai> - .". ~ A...... 1
~. ..~I->~- .. ~y~~ - 9, 1:-~~~1:' ~ r. ~- f JI~ 1'!1-\~ 'I
7 't, : -r.w - ....'" ~ j. r Q- '-'" '"
- 0-\ ' E:.lIl. (~1iI 'l,,; __ _ _ ,_
..-y,... _ J _ '.
, ~Q 0& ,_ __, "' _..l_/.-- -----____ \. /-"
~ 1"'1' I" i /1 ),.../",
~ ., . '\ ' ""'@,g"
. . 'I ....,.., . ,~ ... ..,
. \ ", l;; "'( -1ti;., '(':to' ---
\ 'r,'lI.\ . 9-4;, 51 ~ ""->:1~. I ~<1..
, // \. .I#,(~'/!I ~ q
'---F""g'ilP ~ '" '. ~_' ,. CIJ: J
7,.- !!'ii\v...: ,$311"'" . \ ~~\ii<':.. .
.,;w' . . I, .
m\ ; I { I
\ : ,GI I \
\ ; ,
~; i ~ .
~ Iii! J ~Jo; __._ .' ,..
~ ~,! I1VUlO.\ : .
"~" ~ 10~. ------... i
~""h._J. ~I ~. . '--~ _,
< /"~.' ., :$.-.,' ql ~ 1jI-- ,-- - -= __ !
r.t.!,,1 0, ~. .. , -i-V;.. 1
g ~ ~ l.t' . ~/ '
~'MSlli"i;'Z ~r . Mlf3i\Yi'i~ ~~~.
f:j , ~~\ .. 6
3NA",~. ,
,. 'q,.;- . .
, ,.
~ i
Y m --- '
~~96;' '. ....-..
~;, i~~~~
~,
5:
0'
:::: ,,'\r.O.ll~ UJ
~ F .~. ,
,t? . ~ :,' \ . ~
CO '! ~i ~ ' . <e..
oW : ~ o.;t/ I
.M '}, -. ., ..~G..
:S d' ~ ~/ ..0<..'
CP, I !5' . ,.4 ,p~/ I
';;. I' zi --- . '#~'V .. .
0\ I / .. t
~j ,--' /-~. ~.(&a\
11 !.' ~)"
~ .- "'!l-. ~...
! I . I Q./
------
EXHIBIT C ..
RESOLUTION NO. .
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AN
EXTENDED AND REVISED TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND ARTERIAL STREET
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR 2007-2012, AND DIRECTING
THE SAME TO BE FILED WITH THE WASHINGTON
STATE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BOARD. (AMENDS
RESOLUTION 91-67, 92-117, 93..155, 94-186, 95-210, 96-236,
97-258, 98-273, 99-299, 00-316,01-343, 02-365, 03-391, 04-433,
and 05-451).
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of RCW Chapters 35.77 and 47.26, the City
Council of the City of Federal Way adopted its original Transportation Improvement Program on
July 23, 1991 (Resolution No. 91-67); and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council updated its Transportation Improvement Program. .
("Program") on October 19, 1993, by its passage of Resolution No. 93-155; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council further updated its Transportation Improvement
Program on October 4, 1994 (Resolution No. 94-186); and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council further updated its Transportation Improvement
Program on July 18, 1995 (Resolution No. 95-210); and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council further updated its Transportation Improvement
Program on July 16, 1996 (Resolution No. 96-236); and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City council further updated its Transportation Improvement
'Program on July 1, 1997 (Resolution No., 97-258); and
RES # , PAGE 1 .
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City council further updated its Transportation Improvement
Program on July 7, 1998 (Resolution No., 98-273); and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City council further updated its Transportation Improvement
Program on June 1, 1999 (Resolution No., 99-299); and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City council further updated its Transportation Improvement
Program on June 20, 2000 (Resolution No., 00-316); and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City council further updated its Transportation Improvement
Program on July 17,2001 (Resolution No., 01-343); and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City council further updated its Transportation Improvement
Program on June 18,2002 (Resolution No., 02-365); and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City council further updated its Transportation Improvement
Program on July 15,2003 (Resolution No., 03-391); and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City council further updated its Transportation Improvement
Program on November 2, 2004 (Resolution No., 04-433); and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City council further updated its Transportation Improvement
,
Program on July 19,2005 (Resolution No., 05-451); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Federal Way has reviewed the work
accomplished under the existing Program and has reviewed work scheduled to be accomplished
according to the updated Program; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the revised Transportation Improvement Program
on July 18, 2006, in compliance with the requirements of State laws; and
RES # , PAGE 2
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined current and future City street and arterial
needs, and based upon these findings has prepared a revised and extended Transportation
hnprovement Program and an Arterial Street hnprovement Plan for the ensuing six calendar years;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.77 and 47.26, the City Council is required to annually
revise and adopt an extended Transportation hnprovement Program and an Arterial Street
hnprovement Plan; ~d
WHEREAS, the City's SEP A Responsible Official has adopted the DNS Federal Way File
06-101947 SE issued for the City's 2007 - 2012 Transportation hnprovement Plan (TIP) and Arterial
Street hnprovement Plan (ASIP) which includes the extended and revised projects contained in the
TIP adopted herein; and
WHEREAS, adoption of the City's 2007 - 2012 Transportation hnprovement Plan (TIP) and
Arterial Street hnprovement Plan (ASIP) DNS reflects the fact that there will be no significant
adverse environmental impacts as a result of adoption or implementation of the extended and revised
Transportation hnprovement Plan (TIP) and Arterial Street hnprovement Plan (ASIP) adopted
herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Program Adopted. The extended and revised Transportation hnprovement
Program and Arterial Street hnprovement Plan for the City of Federal Way for the ensuing six (6)
calendar years (2007-2012 inclusive), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by this reference, which sets forth the City's transportation project locations,
RES # , PAGE 3
types of improvements and the estimated costs thereof, is hereby approved and adopted.
Section 2. Filing of Program. Pursuant to Chapter 35.77 RCW, the City Clerk is hereby
authorized and directed to file a copy of this Resolution, together with Exhibit A, with the
Washington State Secretary of Transportation and a copy with the Washington State Transportation
Improvement Board.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution should be
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause or phrase ofthis Resolution.
Section 4. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date
ofthe Resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by
the Federal Way City Council.
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, this _ day of , 2006.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
,
MAYOR, MICHAEL PARK
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, N. LAURA HATHAWAY, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
RES # , PAGE 4
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK.:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
<
RES # , PAGE 5