The URL can be used to link to this page

PRPSC PKT 09-11-20061. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC FORUM 3. COMMISSION COMMENTS 4. APPROVAL OF JULY 10, 2006 SUMMARY 5. COMMITTEE BUSINESS A. Diversity Commission 2006-2007 Business Plan B. Aggressive Begging/Panhandling C. Community Center Update D. Proposed Ordinance to Provide for the removal of Junk Vehicles On Public Rights of Way and Private Property E. Red Light Photo Enforcement Proposal F. Acceptance of Donation to Purchase K-9 Ballistic Vest G. Purchase of 3 Additional Itronix Laptop Computers H. Washington Traffic Safety Commission Grant 6. PENDING ITEMS Action Ron Walker Information Richardson Information Charlie Demming Action Snell Action Wilson Action Wilson Action Wilson Action Wilson 7. NEXT MEETING — October 9, 2006 6:00pm — Hylebos Conference Room 8. ADJOURNMENT 2006 Committee Members: Staff.- Jeanne Burbidge, Chair Donna Hanson, Director Deputy Mayor Jim Ferrell Mary Jaenicke, Administrative Assistant II Linda Kochmar 253-835-6901 City of Federal Way City Council PARKS RECREATION & PUBLIC SAFETY COUNCIL COMMITTEE Monday July 10, 2006 6:00 p.m. SUMMARY In attendance: Council Committee members Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Deputy Mayor Jim Ferrell, Council member Linda Kochmar, Mayor Michael Park, Council member Jack Dovey, Council member Dean McColgan, Derek Matheson, Interim City Manager, Amy Jo Pearsall, City Attorney, Brian Wilson, Deputy Director Public Safety, Iwen Wang, Finance Director Donna Hanson, Director PROS, Mary Faber Recreation and Cultural Services Superintendent, B Sanders Park Planner, Mary Jaenicke, Administrative Assistant. Guests: Ron Walker, Diversity Commission, C.T. Purdom Parks and Recreation Commission, Sally Hurst, Harrell Hurst, Lynda Jenkins, Michelle Brewick, H. David Kaplan, Jerrie Lottes, Richard Spychalski, Hunter Brown, Troy Brown, Kerry Davis, Barbara Uggen Davis, Frank Misner, Joann Hugell, Eric Boettcher, Nancy Chapman, Jess Mueller, Pam Guyle Chair Burbidge called the meeting to order at 6:05p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT Sally Hurst, Harrell Hurst, Michelle Brewick, Jerrie Lottes, Richard Spychalski, Hunter Brown, Troy Brown, Kerry Davis, Barbara Uggen Davis, Frank Misner, Joann Hugell, Eric Boettcher, Nancy Chapman, Jess Mueller, Pam Guyle all spoke in favor of French Lake being the official off leash Dog Park. H. David Kaplan: Reported that he attended the Lakehaven Commissioners meeting and he thanked them for their support they have given to the concept of French Lake Park as an off leash park. He stated that Lakehaven reiterated their support for the idea of an off leash dog park. Marion Gates: Ms. Gates stated that she heard Lakehaven was offering to buy the City of Federal Way's portion of the park. She asked if there was anything that the City can do to keep it a permanent off leash Dog Park. COMMISSION COMMENT C.T. Purdom clarified Option 2 for the French Lake Dog Park. He stated that Option 2 does not reflect what was passed by the Parks Commission. The word permanent was not a part of the motion. Option 2 should read that the Parks Commission voted to establish French Lake Park as the official off leash Dog Park. He stated there was discussion of the word permanent. Nothing is permanent; there are a lot of unknowns. APPROVAL OF SUMMARY Council members Kochmar and Ferrell moved to accept the May meeting minutes as written. Motion passed. BUSINESS ITEMS French Lake Off -Leash Doe Park Ms. Hanson stated that there is no other additional information other than the question of the purchase or potential sale of the city's portion of French Lake Park to Lakehaven. She stated there has been no official action by either the City or Lakehaven. Lakehaven representatives have made the comment in a couple of public meetings. Ms. Hanson has spoken with Don Perry and he has stated that they are interested. She stated that the first step of the process would be for the City Council to consider whether or not they wanted to sell the City's portion of the park. There would then be the process in the negotiation of the long term use and the maintenance of the property. Ms. Hanson stated that there is not any question about the need and desire and positive aspect of having an off leash dog park in the city. Originally it was recommended that it be on a trial basis. The concern that she has as a staff person is that she wants to make sure that we identify the resources that will be required to maintain the park long term. She wants to be sure that we don't create something without providing the resources to maintain the park in its current state. Ms. Hanson stated that Lakehaven presented using underground vaults for water storage. Their trial was successful, and they would like to continue. There would be some construction time for these vaults to be installed, which may be why they're interested in purchasing our portion. Deputy Mayor Ferrell stated that he is in favor of option 2. Deputy Mayor Ferrell moved to approve option 2. Council member Kochmar is an employee of Lakehaven and recused herself from the vote. She stated that she has not been involved in any of the discussions with Lakehaven. Ms. Kochmar stated that we will not be able to avoid the fact that Lakehaven does own the property. Council PARKS, RECREATION, & PUBLIC SAFETY COUNCIL COMMITTEE Monday July 10, 2006 Summary Page 2 member Burbidge stated that this is a public facility and that Lakehaven could use their property. She is concerned regarding the unknown questions, and does not want to give people false hope. There have been some proposed changes in the use of Lakehaven's property. Council member Burbidge seconded the motion. It was moved and seconded to approve option 2 which is to establish French Lake Park as the official off -leash dog park and forward to full Council on July 18, 2006. Motion passed. Federal Way Community Center Business Plan Amendments Ms. Faber introduced Jill Krantz the consultant from Green Play. Ms. Krantz has been working on the Community Center Business Plan. Ms. Krantz revisited items that Council had asked staff to review. The key items Council wanted to review were the operating hours, the admission fee schedule which included the resident/non-resident options, family rate, low income options, and options for discounts for corporate and City of Federal Way employees, and the rental fee schedule. Operating Hours - Facility: The staffing levels were adjusted to accommodate the later closures on Saturday and Sunday evenings, and corresponding changes to revenue were projected. Staff has recommended no changes to the original operating hours. Council held a discussion. Council member Kochmar moved that no change is recommended to the proposed facility operating hours. Deputy Mayor Ferrell Seconded. Ms. Krantz stated that the operating hours should be evaluated on a monthly basis, and it is not a huge problem to implement winter and summer hours. Ms. Krantz advised that a decision on changing the hours should not be made until the building has been opened for nine months. Ms. Pearsall clarified that changing the hours of operation could be a staff level decision. Council would become involved if it affected the budget. Motion passed. Operating Hours — Child Care: Staffing levels were adjusted to accommodate the extended hours. Staff has recommended that no changes be made initially, but that the hours of service should be reviewed after nine months. Again winter and summer hours can be adjusted without a huge change to the budget. Child care is a very unique entity with a lot of flexibility and not a huge impact. Council member Kochmar moved that no change is recommend to the child care operating hours. Deputy Mayor Ferrell seconded. Motion passed. Council member Dovey stated that he believes they are making an error on the child care hours. He stated that the Community Center should be as user friendly for young adults with kids, and under privileged people with kids. He would rather have too many hours in the beginning, and then if they need to cut back the hours or charge more they can do it. Deputy Mayor Ferrell moved to amend the motion to expand the child care hours on Saturday year round. The hours will be from 8:30am-1:30pm on Saturdays year round. Council member Kochmar seconded. Motion passed. Admission Fees — ResidentlNon-Resident: The admission fees were adjusted to reflect the base fee plus a 10% increase for non-residents. A resident is defined as someone who lives or owns a business in the City of Federal Way and pays the I% utility tax funding the capital construction and operating budget of the Community Center. Ms. Krantz reviewed the positive and negatives of a resident/non-resident fee. She is recommending that the resident and non-resident fees be used only on the passes; this is due to the negative impact on front-line service needs. Discussion was held. The committee felt that the non-resident fee should be higher than the base fee plus 10%. Mayor Park would like to have a Special Grand -Opening Fee. Council member Dovey stated that the Teen pass and Family pass fee should be reduced. Deputy Mayor Ferrell was in agreement with Council member Dovey, but felt that the senior fee should also be reduced. It was clarified that we are not charging for the Senior Center. There will still be drop-in activities where the seniors will not have to pay. They would have to pay to work out, take a fitness class or other classes. Council member Kochmar moved to keep the resident fee schedule and to change the non-resident base fee plus 15% and allow staff to use that money towards teens and family. Deputy Mayor Ferrell seconded. Motion Passed Admission Fees — Family: The definition of a family is related adults living in the same household with or without dependent children. Staff is recommending maintaining a flat family rate. Ms. Krantz reviewed the pros and cons of a flat family rate. Council member Kochmar moved to recommend that the original family rates be implemented. Deputy Mayor Ferrell seconded. Motion Passed. Admission Fees — Low Income: Low income options are recommended at a 25% discount for resident pass. In order to qualify you must be a resident of Federal Way, qualify annually based on Federal poverty standards. Deputy Mayor Ferrell moved to recommend a low income rate at a discount of 25% off resident pass. Council member Kochmar seconded. Motion Passed. Admission Fees - Corporate and City of Federal Way Employee "Discounts': Two options were reviewed, and Miss Krantz reviewed the pros and cons of both options. Council member Kochmar stated that in the past there had been discussion that City of Federal Way Police Officers would be able to use the facility for free. Ms. Wang stated that the Police Officers would receive the same discount as the other City of Federal Way employees. Council member Kochmar asked Deputy Wilson if this would be a hardship on the police officers. Deputy Wilson answered no. Deputy Mayor Ferrell moved to recommend that employees of businesses and "benefit eligible" City of PARKS, RECREATION, & PUBLIC SAFETY COUNCIL COMMITTEE Monday July 10, 2006 Summary Page 3 Federal Way employees be permitted to purchase passes at the resident rate regardless of their personal residency. It is recommended that City employees whose primary work place is the Community Center receive free drop-in access to facilities and classes. Facility employees will pay full rates for programs/classes with an associated fee. Free drop-in does not include employee family members. Council member Kochmar seconded. Motion Passed. Fee Schedule — Rentals: The base fee applies to non-resident non -profits, business and private citizens. The Non- resident fee applies to any rental by an individual or organizations whose address is outside of Federal Way. Community room rental fee includes set-up/tear down, staff supervision. The birthday party room rental fee includes admission for 12 people, room rental for one hour. Council member Burbidge stated that the Community Room needs to be available for shorter rental periods. She would like it to be available for 4 hour rentals. Council member Dovey would like to include the amphitheater with the community room as a rental option. Council member Kochmar moved to take staff recommendation with the caveat that the amphitheater could be rented separately or rented with the community room if that room is available. Deputy Mayor Ferrell seconded. Motion Passed. Rental Rates — Gymnasium, Kitchen, Amphitheatre, Entire Facility: Deputy Mayor Ferrell moved to recommend that the fees listed in the rate schedule be implemented. Council member Kochmar seconded. Motion Passed. Rental Rates — Birthday Party Rental Period: Council member Kochmar moved to recommend that the rental period for the birthday party rooms remain the same. As additional fee, $120 for non-resident is also recommended. Deputy Mayor Ferrell seconded. Motion passed. Deputy Mayor Ferrell moved to put the Community Center Business Plan on the Council agenda as Council Business at the next practical meeting. Council member Kochmar seconded. Motion passed. Thompson Property — Cedar Grove Deputy Mayor Ferrell moved approval of Cedar Grove Park as the official park name for the Thompson Property located at 2228 South 333rd Street and to forward this motion for the consent agenda at the next regular Council meeting. Council member Kochmar seconded. Council member Burbidge stated that as they did further research on the park, they learned that there were a number of cedar trees at the park, and that the park plan includes more cedar trees being planted. Citizen Lynda Jenkins: Stated that she had wanted the park to be named Webb Center. She is disheartened that Council did not take her advice. Motion passed. Diversity Commission — Residency Requirement Ron Walker, Chair of the Diversity Commission requested that Council amend the provisions relating to the membership of the Federal Way Diversity Commission in Chapter 2, Federal Way City Code. Mr. Walker explained that currently the code states that all nine commissioners must live in the Federal Way School District and that at least seven also live within the city limits. Mr. Walker stated the Commission would like to have the code modified to allow anyone living within the school district and PAA be eligible to serve on the commission. Deputy Mayor Ferrell moved to forward the ordinance to second reading and enactment at the next regular City Council meeting. Council member Kochmar seconded. Motion passed. Cabins Park Phase II: Parking Lot — Reiect Bid and Authorize to Re -Bid in Smaller Packages Council member Kochmar moved to reject the bid from A-1 Landscaping and proceed with re -bidding the individual components of the project. Deputy Mayor Ferrell seconded. Motion passed. Thompson Property Park: Award Bid Ms. Sanders clarified that the bid award includes the base bid and Alternate one — Tot Play Equipment for a total cost of $347,366.85. Funds from the Madrona Park account will be transferred to the Thompson Property Park account. The remaining funds from Madrona Park are approximately $30,000. Funds will also be transferred from the Annual Playground Renovation account. Council member Kochmar moved approval to award the Thompson Park project to GMT, Inc. and to transfer funds as specified to fully fund the Base Bid and Alternate 1. Deputy Mayor Ferrell seconded. Motion passed. Cabins Park PSE Easement Council member Kochmar moved to approve entering into an agreement with Puget Sound Energy for an Ingress/Egress Easement for construction of a parking lot at Cabins Park. Deputy Mayor Ferrell seconded. Motion passed. PARKS, RECREATION, & PUBLIC SAFETY COUNCIL COMMITTEE Monday July 10, 2006 Summary Page 4 Bid Acceptance for the Purchase of Bomb Van Council member Kochmar moved approval of the Bid Acceptance of Pacific Coast Ford's Bid of $38,875.60 for the purchase of the Bomb Van. Deputy Mayor Ferrell seconded. Motion passed. 2006 Justice Assistance Grant Council member Kochmar moved authorize the City Manager to accept the 2006 Justice Assistance Grant award in the amount of $29,114 for the purchase of 46 Itroniz GoBook IVIII vehicle cradles at a cost of $525 each. Deputy Mayor Ferrell seconded. Chair Burbidge stated that this was to improve the laptops in the police cars. Motion passed. PENDING ITEMS None NEXT MEETING — August 14, 2006 6:00 p.m. in the Hylebos Conference Room ADJOURNMENT - Meeting adjourned at 8:55p.m. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 3, 2006 ITEM #: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: DIVERSITY COMMISSION 2006-2007 BUSINESS PLAN POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council approve the 2006-2007 Diversity Commission Business Plan as presented? COMMITTEE: Parks, Recreation, and Public Safety MEETING DATE: Sept. 11, 2006 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Natalie Administrative Assistant II DEPT: City Manager The Diversity Commission Business Plan for 2006-2007 calls for managing the Martin Luther King, Jr. Celebration and Senior High School Summit; partnering with AmeriCorps on community building projects in diverse neighborhoods; providing culturally diverse books to school libraries for the enrichment of young readers; producing a Community Night event featuring the foods, traditions, and entertainment of a particular cultural group; using the programs from the Southern Poverty Law Center to examine the possibilities of integrating a tolerance education curriculum into the Federal Way School District; developing an .'international flag collection that is purchased and donated by cultural groups to display at public events, parades, and facilities; offering suggestions to City management that will help to achieve and maintain a diverse labor force; establishing a more effective Diversity Commission recruitment strategy to attract members who represent various races, ages, classes, and genders reflected in the community; contacting small, ethnic media outlets to educate, market, and assist in facilitating diversity in the City's workforce and commissions; continuing the Commission's public relations efforts via all media forums; periodic attendance and reporting at City Council meetings, inviting guest speakers to address the Commission on relevant community issues; and forming an alumni group of past commissioners who would be available to assist with large projects and offer advice as needed. Attachments: 1. 2006-2007 Diversity Commission Business Plan Options Considered: 1. Approve the Business Plan. 2. Return the Business Plan to the Diversity Commission with direction for revision. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option 1. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: councu DIRECTOR APPROVAL: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: PRPSC recommends Option Committee Chair Committee Member f\^ Council Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: `I move to approve the committee's recommendation." BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED 1ST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION # f\-2 FEDERAL WAY DIVERSITY COMMISSION BUSINESS PLAN 2006-2007 Purpose: Advises the City Council on policy matters involving the community's cultural and ethnic differences, ensuring that these differences are considered in the decision-making process. Mission: To help Federal Way become a community which is united amidst diversity, where each individual is respected, equally valued, equally needed and equally cherished. Equality is not sameness; it is equivalent value. Members: Ron Walker (Chair), Jacqueline Piel (Vice -Chair), Dorry Peterson, J. Lee Cook, Suzanne Smith, Jason Weichert, Nanette Gammage, DeBorah Little, and Rhona Ray Projects Martin Luther King Event Manage the 2006 Martin Luther King, Jr. Celebration and the Senior High School Summit; support the campaign to build a monument to Martin Luther King in Washington, D.C. (January 2007) Book Donations Provide culturally diverse books to school libraries for the enrichment of young readers. (October/November 2006) Community Night Produce an event that features the foods, traditions, and entertainment of a particular cultural group. (April 2007) Teaching Tolerance Using the programs from the Southern Poverty Law Center, examine the possibilities of integrating a tolerance education curriculum into the Federal Way School District. (Fall 2006) International Flag Collection Develop an international flag collection that is purchased and donated by cultural groups in the city. Display at public events, parades, and facilities. (Ongoing) AmeriCorps Partnership Partner with AmeriCorps on community building projects, especially in diverse neighborhoods. (Ongoing) Human Resources Assistance Offer suggestions to City management to help achieve and maintain a labor force that reflects the diversity of Federal Way; establish a more effective Diversity Commission recruitment strategy to attract members who represent various races, ages, classes, and genders in the community; contact small, ethnic media outlets to educate, market, and assist in facilitating diversity in the City's workforce and commissions (Ongoing) f\,3 Public Relations Promote commission programs and diversity through all media forums, including local and ethnic newspapers, Channel 21, City Update newsletter, award opportunities, school assemblies, Speakers' Bureau, website, commission brochure, and event attendance; attend City Council meetings periodically to increase Commission involvement and give visibility to the Council and community. (Ongoing) Guest Speakers Arrange for guest speakers at meetings to address community issues. Invite community members to attend these meetings. (Ongoing) Diversity Commission Alumni Group Form an alumni group of past commissioners who would be available to assist on large projects and to offer advice as needed. (Fall 2006) COUNCIL MEETING DATE: N/A ITEM #: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Aggressive Begging/Panhandling POLICY QUESTION: Should the Federal Way Parks, Recreation, and Public Safety Committee direct staff to draft a revised aggressive begging/panhandling ordinance? COMMITTEE: PARKS, RECREATION AND PUBLIC SAFETY MEETING DATE: 9/11/06 CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Patricia A. Richardson Ci Attorney DEPT: Law ........_....._......----..._._._.........- ................-_...-. _. h'_......_..........._._......_.._y....--...----._........._ _. . Background: A citizen provided Council with a proposed ordinance to address aggressive begging/panhandling in the City. The proposed ordinance is attached. Council has asked staff to review the proposal along with the City's current ordinance to see if any changes would be warranted. Law Department Staff has reviewed the proposed citizen ordinance and compared the proposal to other jurisdictions' code provisions (table attached). Accordingly, it does not appear that any amendments to the City's aggressive begging code provisions are warranted. Attachments: Memo to the Parks, Recreation, and Public Safety Committee; Proposed Citizen Ordinance; and Comparison Chart of other jurisdictions' code provisions STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A — Information only. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL:_ ttee Council Committee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: N/A BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED 1sT reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION # 3I CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Memorandum DATE: August 14, 2006 TO: Parks, Recreation and Public Safety Committee FROM: Patricia A. Richardson, City Attorney Amy Jo Pearsall, Assistant City Attorney QS�� CC: Neal Beets, City Manager SUBJECT: Aggressive Begging/Panhandling Background A citizen recently provided Council with a proposed ordinance to address aggressive begging/panhandling in the City. The proposed citizen ordinance is attached. Council has asked staff to review the proposal along with the City's current ordinance to see if any changes would be warranted. Discussion The City of Federal Way has adopted an Aggressive Begging ordinance, which makes it a crime for any person to engage in aggressive begging in the City. Aggressive begging is defined as begging with the "intent to intimidate another person into giving money or goods." FWCC 6-188. This ordinance addresses aggressive begging in any public place, including roads, sidewalks, and parking areas. In 2005, Council approved an amendment to this code section that introduced additional definitions of aggressive begging based on a person's conduct. For example, begging with the use of false information; begging in a way that is unsafe, that threatens the safety of others, or that impedes traffic; begging in a manner that exploits children; and begging by willfully providing an unsolicited service and demanding payment in return. To ensure that Federal Way's code language is just as. strong as other cities, and to see if any other cities have passed new legislation that addresses aggressive begging, Law Department staff researched the City's neighboring jurisdiction's codes. See the attached comparison chart. Although some cities have used a different form, most have very similar provisions, and none have any provisions more stringent than those of Federal Way. As can be seen in the chart, eight other cities were examined, including Kent, Auburn, Des Moines, Lakewood, Tacoma, Seattle, Renton and Everett. Among the eight jurisdictions, Federal Way, Auburn and Lakewood have the most comprehensive code provisions to deal with aggressive 31-2- Parks, Recreation and Public Safety Committee Aggressive Begging/Panhandling August 11, 2006 Page 2 of 2 begging. These three cities have a broader definition of what aggressing begging is defined as, which allows officers to cite people who are begging in a matter that exploits children or who provide a an unsolicited service and demand payment. Kent, Des Moines, Tacoma, Seattle, Renton, and Everett do not address these circumstances in their respective codes. In addition, Federal Way, like Auburn, Des Moines, Lakewood, Seattle and Renton, have defined "intimidate," to make it clear what behavior is prohibited, whereas Kent, Tacoma, and Everett are silent on this matter. Finally, Federal Way has one of the most comprehensive definitions of "public place," which, together with all of the other code provisions, make this one of the toughest municipal code sections in the area to address aggressive begging. Conclusion The proposed citizen ordinance provided is virtually identical to current Federal Way code provisions on Aggressive Begging. Currently, Federal Way has one of the toughest set of provisions in its code to prohibit aggressive begging, and these code provisions already cover the places enumerated in the proposed language if the begging is conducted in a way to constitute aggressive begging as defined by the code. As a result, it does not appear that any further amendments are necessary to the City's aggressive begging code provisions. KAAgenda Item\PRPS\2006\Aggn:ssive Begging -Panhandling 081106 5/2/2006 Proposed Ordinance Change: BEGGING AND AGGRESSIVE BEGGING (PANHANDLING AND AGGRESSIVE PANHANDLING) A. It is lawful for any person to engage in begging (or panhandling) in any public place in the city as those terms are defined by the sections on Begging and Aggressive Begging: 1. "Begging" (or panhandling) is defined here as asking for money or goods as a charity, whether by words, bodily gestures, signs or other means. 2. "Public place" is defined as (a) any public road, lane, parking area, sidewalk, or other publicly owned building, facility or structure; (b) any public playground, school ground, recreation ground, park, parkway, park drive, park path, or rights of way open to the use of the public; or (c) any privately owned property adapted to and fitted for vehicular or pedestrian travel that is in common use by the public with consent, expressed or implied, of the owner or owners. B. It is unlawful for any person to engage in aggressive begging in any public place in the city as terms are defined under aggressive begging. "Aggressive begging" (or aggressive panhandling) is defined here as (a) begging with intent to intimidate, expressed or implied, another person into giving money or goods such as: continually asking for money, non consensual touching while soliciting, following a person who walks away from a person begging after being solicited, blocking the path or entrance to any building or vehicle while soliciting or using obscene, profane or abusive language during a request or following a refusal to make a donation, (b) begging with the use of false, misleading information or under false pretenses; (c) begging with or involving activities that are unsafe or dangerous to any person or property; (d) begging in a manner that exploits children; (e) willfully providing or delivering or attempting to provide or deliver, unrequested or unsolicited services or products with a demand or exertion of pressure for payment in return (f) soliciting a person standing in line and waiting to be admitted to a commercial establishment (g) begging in a group of 2 (two) or more persons (h) Begging prior to sunrise or after sunset (i) begging within 25 feet of a bank or ATM machine or check cashing business, at bus stops or on public transportation vehicles, and 0) begging a person or persons in parked or stopped vehicles in highly trafficked and/or tourist related areas as well as the area known as the City Center or City Center Frame or within 100 feet of any intersection with a traffic signal. 2 "To intimidate" is defined as coercion or attempts to do so or frighten into submission or obedience or to engage in conduct that would make a reasonable person fearful or feel compelled. 3. "Exploit" is defined as using an unethical, selfish or abusive manner or in any other manner that gives an unfair advantage. C. Violation of this section shall be a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine up to $1,000 or by a jail sentence of up to 90 days, or by both fine and jail time. 3-- 9 Page i of i -B-5 o v 71 — ,, r > > N o N W �. an � to o m O al (L) cd fn ca; N c O u 03 C".U' _ O tU. Q 'b N <n cd C13 N cc IL'a v >a o .S -i cd o 0 O� o o a a ami o is o i .o ��' , -14 O 0 a� O > " " p 3 t > o 03 �.� -� bACj H bQ { a cli w � � Q � U O O Y O y �. OD ¢, ��" T U U cls N W b0 by Q blDN Q P� p o Y Q o i V� co) cd u fn bAcll w >. bA OO W 'a y O U as N cd� J0 9:4 ' w cd . N c's N >, N U T cd O O O T . � N U y U �o tl. .--. O bo bO.O bo O Q U Q b�A 'b OU O d .fl R. Q U Cd 4-0 - O L: - .✓2 > ) El O cd O cd ca IV s b0 I". cd E bA v d N w bb dm w bto C4 N 04 y- n Id U c1l.0 H z a x z a a -B-5 a (.. ?� ami [," [V -N H o Vl P. i5 ca 3 >'. U a° Y 1: •� .si L h H . u aOL •� _tn �" 'o LJ N. p y u° P.•H. b y Ol N N p On N v 00 m u b u N i ca ¢� y N O H O �-. u v Uca of U. t1. W O W O tl. i1. ca 4. O O �..' O F'' .0 - - .D - H ,.fl U ca SJ. • SY W :-, .a ca T a� GY; .fl .� � Y _ an H Y C's a o0 0 T a� ocl 3 & � 0 va H. Y o° > to E� cd a co 0 T cd Y u 3 0 0 CdN a 00 0 O [� .Y z CIO C13 f] On O oO�00 T Y Y o to o MO off,+ o 3 [�J+ an a� bn - > on H `° .H b R o ° o o ca a al o O oan Qn N H b iz ^ `8 p � 0 cll W to N c O a> Y 0 �n 0 -� O .� per. Dnp ti c0 'O .� _.ny _.-.� u ��p!!! C'I H �7 [a C [a f"•+ H w�C -.1: H N H N co - ono c 3 �., 3 LL o �.. 0 v 3 � ti. ; �, �4 � - . �a �a b ca s� ca a� o ai t� v at tl v a rn > H 'b G o0 0 Q) Q 0.5 0 p 0 O H , bO �. cla.�o 9i cd ° co iii o o 0 o o t o N o 'b to VI H iNi C,Q +�-' �l cli O bp WNO° A try h.3� • 'U`cd .fl - q OHn D > mp>.42 _ 0O C.05 U 1''+ .0 �-+ ° aHG ca N N O ca0 .6 m aX� U 3 .� ca H N u O O S-"-�rl Y .n a0 OD cd W O yu•, N .9c0 O AQP00 �. ca Y OD N '5! Cl pq p m Ncd bn a v n°0n-A �, .° �� j o - °' o N N 0 E H -o ani 3. u o cn ea H a.•� 4, a .n .O o an .. ro a -... � CIS cu n .3 > O z HO O � �, to H �O 3 V Cd _o cR 4y H O y cn On O ° cn W = O rn H . fn 4r O °O+ N ,FIV H •Y O 4) N w o aHi o ami ° �+ ami v ci a Y •3 Y a� > a0i N w o aDca w p a b w R ami ca 3 8 o� i d Hnnca a "o o ¢> tjti (XV cu '� on c to 'on bp an w a ca no0 0 U f .O s-. S: cd 0 N 0 N .b ccs -^ cli O L: cC O W N O p U _> O pswcli 7:1 ¢, cd 0 N OC's> O O O cd O o w cn .0 0 3 0 w '_ A i^ ca b .00p0+ �°-'y O ai :'' p oCIS- �+ T'" • V b G {,., . chi a� -- rte! .}L^ vi .,A 0 O fl A o i a� c� a W m ca m °° 00 �. (u �. 3 0 q O O o c�, - cd *, O v - �, .� ai OD o' 9 'u e a° '> `y° vCd sa v o °�' a ami i s W °�' cd H C E on C13 v Y N0Y 0 -203bow. o cq � 000 it O y i. -�- 0}ca O ca 'o U O '� '. in O C, v v` o b C's z;; s. s a� X O cd CL b 0 cn CL cd U ca y Ci. R. �, :a 0 D cd _> -cl W O . U c cd cd aD cd *C,; 0 y 0 U 0 O U b 0 O O cd rdEi 3S-4 rd .tvO OUO O Us.r. n ca FNtU..' 0bU 'N^vi Rw O O HY� cc o ai. w al ca v b 0 O 0 00 -� o 00 � � 3 3 H oo v no Y w o Cd N0 - O 0c,3 40 cc O N O � 0Oo v H w 3 3 0 00 b ` c fl o O 0 w O> w cli a� a> O w [-� Q3 d b Z G N �-. ca O h O O O .� '� 0,, 00 v H Ei Ow 3 3 0o U O O >, b ,0 o 0 0 o p �, T Y a3 V o N 111 •Y 00 0 om.' `CU.' 0 N Oz0 U .t Q E oo U 3 3 00 � �.• T � 0 o 0 N D O r 0 ca T U p N 0 cls �O N Q O cv a O to Dn 3 3 H o 0 0 w o H -0 h N a" 'b +-' O cd 0 0 ai n o0o v 3 3 q �+ 0 O s. p 0 0 N O T T .fl N 0 N O O w 0 tO boo Q 000 3 3 x 0 cl w o n 0 - m N 0 `n cd o b 0 H� o0n X 3 3 n� � on c 3 Y Y Q% Y i w~ > W Q 0 z Cd b Y cd 3 u � w o o N f -Y b rlw Cd a`�i Cd a ca a E0 3 El cl o O C) cu C) E-+ z O 0 L+ o 0 °. _ al 1 0 (U o 14 °° 12. E� o o v 3 E i o , o o 0 0 o o 0 VO Q t)o o H�o 0 ° o °� N N_ N N OV on pq w N U . f. w f� 0 0 0 X. F. c 0 Y w ami Q 0 z Cd i b 3 cl, w �w v c� v a u cl a .tj PC QI Cl) c o4 $-, >, o - � � - �+ ;6 - � 00 'd o ti fn o Qq o o G °��° oo > w° b v °� Y R a_ 3 o :d N R u a� „ i y ,� O R v O ca S3 b ti R O OA s1 . V) D R N R b N w N a� C13 7s ci, R O- R N R �' R .`-� p Q' N R >' i., w bca bb 00 p > >. O y0,., Y 'U N > C N .fl'L7 y`�-, a a° Y o b a a o ao :: co v a i n a v o Cd o "� aXi - o. o tc" N 3 N N CCo O N O D v� T O 0. " 00 ,d 0 Cd o W ti o. 00 cd a fl v d~> x w b aui o b b dao> cdclnab av, a.- 7sti�iz(1)Cba0io w o o 0 b b O �Cli. 3w y N R N c O 0 c rn r. �; 3 ¢ r Y `o o b N t° U o Q=. '� o o 3 w n y R cV p b co". f1cn i -j fl..... � b A. N R b N .O b N N :3 cli a' id Rn, A. 'b "++ iL :-. ' R - 3 v Ot�o , CKS %�' 'L1 .tj R �... �., y ,b V Tj vi C's x Nb>`° >a V o CdR ,tC �i U iO R Cd QO OA Ob1. OvD¢°U o S1. �]'" CL R R >R. i1. a'�. N o R i-" N 'Li i-. R ON y, b o N R 0 L"• t".' vi .0 .N+ �. o 0 �' " n Q H "> b A ami °' ro o u o ,. H s b yy+ d CL O P, O R R > t�. ai bA oq a. a a a � a ate-, S3.'J a> ax3 O %a. GL 3 i7 Cd p se °�' w o o o cl C's g:4amiv °o> E03 9 N '�>V u at>+ cd,x° Ot ` o TJ 'b LO R R O cd ba [d O 'yD o R0 A>R .°¢ w v -ti Cd cd � Q- o 0 ? o � OA .c ,� >1 on � CIS A ( 0 '"i ao b a3i 3 u ° aCIS ca CL) d on > a R ie n '� a Ct al 7,2 � o on . o 45 o ami - b ami fl b ami o 1. aRi �° '~ O o 'b o O03 o . .Y o Z cdO o �O N of R v R p vi >� ti 0 v�0i abi c�a Y o v i 3tr� a� n ai •'= on o G 3 v a o0 o (�' .b >,'.� Y o -0 o b O„ v p �' aoi A cd -1 0 v O +�� 44 C ca ca d a '� o o > p ia,aXi " o o o u ao �°'. oo a 0. a a R a o ra a u 064 ca A4 ? ƒ 2.)C, E-dea«&g27v-0—G / R ©� 1-0° ƒ 7 2 £ optot=°�� " / [ 2 G C # k R % § 2 \ / \ # ƒ g COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 3, 2006 ITEM #: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance to Provide for the Removal of Junk Vehicles on Public Rights of Way and Private Property. POLICY QUESTION: Should the Federal Way City Code, Chapter 15, Article V, be amended to add anew provision to provide for the removal of junk vehicles on public rights of way or private property? COMMITTEE: PARKS, RECREATION AND PUBLIC SAFETY MEETING DATE: 9/11/06 CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ® Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Patricia A. Richardson Ci Attorne DEPT: Law Background: Under the current Federal Way City Code junk vehicles are declared public nuisances. Since 2000, code enforcement officers have responded to nearly 400 complaints of junk vehicles. Enforcement of junk vehicles on private property has been limited to civil and criminal penalties because the traditional process of abatement is time consuming and costly. The proposed ordinance would give enforcement officials the authority to impound such vehicles and vehicle parts after giving the property owner and registered owner notice and an opportunity for a hearing. Attachments: Proposed Ordinance STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the proposed Ordinance and forward to full Council for first reading at the October 3, 2006, City Council Meeting. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: i w vcommw Council Committee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move the proposed Ordinance to second reading and approval at the next regular meeting on October 17, 2006." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED IST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED - 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION # �1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ARTICLE V, CHAPTER 15 OF THE FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE REMOVAL OF JUNK VEHICLES ON PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY AND PRIVATE PROPERTY. WHEREAS, maintaining junk vehicles in residential areas is currently unlawful as public nuisances under the Federal Way City Code, subjecting violators to civil or criminal penalties; and WHEREAS, law enforcement officers and code enforcement officers enforce the junk vehicle provisions of the Federal Way City Code as public nuisances and can only remove such vehicles using abatement proceedings which are time consuming and costly; and WHEREAS, there are no efficient provisions regarding the removal or impoundment of junk vehicles on private property; and WHEREAS, since 2000, code compliance officers have received nearly 400 complaints strictly regarding junk vehicle; and WHEREAS, Council finds that the public would benefit by the speedy and efficient removal of junk vehicles which are public nuisances; and WHEREAS, RCW 46.55.240 as it exists or is hereafter amended, provides the City Council may enact ordinances establishing efficient, cost effective and more timely procedures for the removal of junk vehicles or parts thereof as public nuisances from public rights of way and private property; and ORD # , PAGE 1 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. A new section is added to Chapter 15, Article V, Motor Vehicles, of the Federal Way City Code to read as follows: 15-141. (1) Junk or junked vehicles are declared public nuisances under FWCC 22-1 and 22-952 (2) Junk vehicles may be impounded provided the following notice and hearing procedures are fulfilled: (a) At least fifteen days prior to impoundment notice shall be provided to the property owner of record, and sent to the vehicle's last registered owner of record if the vehicle's owner's identity can be determined and that person is different from the property owner. The notice shall provide that a hearing may be requested and that if no hearing is requested the vehicle will be removed. This notice may be contained in the notice of violation If the owner or occupier of the property hinders the City from ascertaining the owner of the vehicle the owner of the property shall be presumed to be the owner of the vehicle; (b) If a request for a hearing is received a notice giving the time location and date of the hearing on the question of abatement and removal of the vehicle or part thereof as aup blic nuisance shall be mailed, by regular mail and certified mail with a five-dav return receipt requested, to the owner of the land as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and to the -last registered and legal owner of record of the vehicle unless the owner cannot be determined This hearing may be held in the same manner and at the same time as an appeal of the notice of violation under FWCC 1-19• (c) This section shall not apply to (i) a vehicle or part thereof that is completely enclosed within a building in a lawful manner where it is not visible from the street or other public or private property or(ii) a vehicle or part thereof that is stored or parked in a lawful manner on private property in connection with the business of a licensed dismantler or licensed vehicle dealer and is fenced according to RCW 46.80.130 as it exists or is hereafter amended; (d) The owner of the land on which the vehicle is located may appear in person at the hearing or present a written statement in time for consideration at the hearing and deny responsibility for the presence of the vehicle on the land with his reasons for the denial. If it is determined at the hearing that the vehicle was placed on the land without the consent of the and owner and that he has not subsequently acquiesced in its presence then the local agency shall not ORD 4 ,PAGE 2 assess costs of administration or removal of the vehicle against the property upon which the vehicle is located or otherwise attempt to collect the cost from the owner of the property (e) After notice has been given of the intent of the City to dispose of the vehicle and after a hearing, if requested, has been held, the vehicle or part thereof shall be removed at the request of a law enforcement officer or a code enforcement officer with notice to the Washington state patrol and the department of licensing that the vehicle has been wrecked. (3) At least fifteen days after an unappealed notice of violation under FWCC 1-17 is issued or at least fifteen days after the final decision on an appealed notice of violation anyjunk or junked vehicle or part thereof as defined by FWCC 22-1 and/or 22-952 and encompassed by the notice of violation is subject to summary impoundment at the direction of a law enforcement officer or code enforcement officer. A law enforcement officer or code enforcement officer may take custody of such vehicle, at his or her discretion, and provide for its prompt removal to a place of safety. An impoundment under this section shall not be considered an abatement under FWCC 1-21 nor subject to its provisions. (4) A warrant to enter the property and impound any vehicles shall not be required to impound vehicles that are visible from outside of the property and accessible from normal access routes from the public right of way, including but not limited to those vehicles on or adjacent to driveways and not behind closed gates. (a) A judge of the Municipal Court of the City of Federal Way, upon aproper oath or affirmation showing compliance with the section and probable cause that a junk or junked vehicle is present on a property, shall have power to issue a warrant directed to a state or local official authorizing the official to enter the propertyto o impound the vehicle. (b) A warrant shall issue only upon application of a designated officer or employee of a prosecuting or regulatory authority supported by declaration or affidavit made under oath or upon sworn testimony before the judge and establishing probable probable cause for the issuance of the warrant and particularly describing the property and the vehicle or vehicles to be impounded. For purposes of this section, probable cause exists if there is reasonable cause to believe that a junk or junked vehicle is present upon the particular property to be entered. (c) If the judge is satisfied that the standard for issuing a warrant has been met the fudge shall issue the warrant. The warrant must particularly describe the property and the vehicle or vehicles to be impounded. d) A warrant issued pursuant to this section must be executed and returned within ten days unless, upon a showing of a need for additional time, the period is extended or renewed by a judge upon a finding that such extension or renewal is in the public interest. A copy of the warrant and a receipt for any property seized pursuant to the warrant shall be given to the person whose property is entered, or if the person is not at the property, the copy shall be left in or on the property that was ORD # , PAGE 3 entered or from which property was taken. The return of the warrant shall be promptly accompanied by a written inventory of any property taken. (e) A copy of the return shall be attached to the warrant and filed with the clerk of the court. (5) Costs of removal may be assessed against the registered owner of the vehicle if the identity of the owner can be determined, unless the owner in the transfer of ownership of the vehicle has complied with RCW 46.12. 101 as it exists or is hereafter amended, or the costs may be assessed against the owner of the property on which the vehicle is stored. (6) A registered disposer under contract to the City for the impounding of vehicles shall comply with any administrative regulations on the handling and disposing of vehicles. Section 2. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 3. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage and publication, as provided by law. . PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of , 2006. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, MICHAEL PARK ORD # , PAGE 4 ATTEST: CITY CLERK, LAURA HATHAWAY, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. K:\ord\2006\junk impound ordinance 2 Revised ORD # ,PAGE 5 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 19, 2006 ITEM #: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Red Light Photo Enforcement POLICY QUESTION: To increase public safety through traffic enforcement of traffic laws associated with red light traffic signal violations, should the City approve the use of red light photo enforcement? COMMITTEE: Parks, Recreation, and Public Safety Council Committee MEETING DATE: September 11, 2006 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Connie E. S Attachments: 1. PRPS Committee Memo Traffic Lieutenant Options Considered: 1. Accept proposal to adopt the red light photo enforcement in the city 2. Reject acceptance of grant. DEPT: Police Department STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option 1 to accept the red light photo enforcement CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:' DIRECTOR APPROVAL: Con Council Conunttee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: PRPS recommends Option _ be accepted and forwards to Full Council for approval on September 19, 2006. Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of adopting the red light photo enforcement to help increase public safety. BELOW TO BE COMPLETED B Y CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED IST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION # PI CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: September 11, 2006 TO: Parks, Recreation, and Public Safety Council Committee VIA: Neal Beets, City Manager FROM: Brian Wilson, Interim Chief of Pohce SUBJECT: Red Light Photo Enforcement i f Introduction: The purpose of red light photo enforcement from the law enforcement perspective is to improve traffic safety. Background: Recently, in the state of Washington the use, of electronic photo images to combat traffic collisions resulting in personal injury and property damage has begun to be researched and implemented in several municipalities. In addition to reduction of collisions, another benefit that city officials are reaping is the generated revenue, all of which is being retained by the city. The city of Seattle has recently implemented Red Light Photo Enforcement after conducting lengthy research, and has released several Media Releases pertaining to the purpose and the desired effect of this new type of Traffic Enforcement. City of Auburn has recently implemented red light photo enforcement. Several other cities, including Olympia, Lynnwood, Redmond, and Lacey are all in the research stage, and are strongly considering implementing a similar program as Seattle. Process: Red light photo enforcement is specific and detailed in photographing intersection violations, providing photographic evidence of the violation. The evidence would include photos of the vehicle behind the violation line with the red light clearly shown, completion of the vehicle traveling through the intersection with the red light in view, a photo of the license plate of the vehicle, and a brief video of the full violation sequence. Once the violations are captured and processed, the violation photos and video, along with the DOL registered owner information is provided to the police department in an on-line format that the officer can view and confirm if a violation has occurred, authorizing the vendor to mail the citation to the violator. E -Z The citation includes the photos, capturing the violation with their rear license plate. These photos and video clips can be viewed by the violator on-line, reducing challenges in court and increasing compliance. If desired, or necessary, all images can be viewed in court during challenges of the citation. Assumptions The driving habits of a vast majority of motor vehicle drivers will follow the rules of the road at all times while operating a motor vehicle on the streets of our city. Reality, that if there is no police presence or targeted enforcement to alter drivers' poor or dangerous driving habits, i.e. speeding, running stops signs, running red -lights, tailgating, etc. a segment of drivers will knowingly drive in a manner that violates traffic laws. With targeted traffic enforcement provided by dedicated Traffic Officers, at no time have the officers been unable stay continually busy, with traffic stops, and the issuance of traffic infractions, even at locations that they continue to enforce at a routine basis. One of the greatest areas of enforcement is in intersection safety management. Intersection traffic violations and accidents remain the most difficult area for an Officer to control and manage. To meet the enforcement issues including budgetary concerns and the human resources available it is becoming prudent for cities to investigate the use of existing and emerging technologies. • Routine or assigned red light enforcementf red light violations by uniformed officers only impact the habits of those drivers that are contacted and cited. • Officers must be present to impact the driving habits of red-light runners. • Red Light enforcement is a more dangerous targeted enforcement for police officers due to heavy traffic flow during commute hours, and additionally the officer must view the traffic light, and violation before pursuing the violator. • In cities where red light photo enforcement has been implemented, red light violations have drastically dropped. A "halo effect' occurs in cities with known intersections that have red light photo enforcement, causing drivers to drive more cautiously in the general vicinity. Summary Numerous companies are competing for contracts in neighboring agencies, and are constantly updating and improving their capabilities. When proper public education is provided, communities welcome the added traffic enforcement benefit that provides more safety and protects their property. Several companies provide all the software and training, working directly with Traffic Engineers, 2 lEr_:�) Court Personnel and Police. With some companies, there are no initial equipment expenditures to the city. Analysis of targeted intersections, technical support, billing and website access for violators provided. Most costs are off set by violators, which need to be a minimum of 2 a day, per approach of a minimum of 10,000 cars. Prior to implementation, research is conducted on intersections identified by police for "pilot" program. Police resources have to be allocated to review and approve photo enforcement infractions on a daily basis, depending on the number of intersections could range up to 10 hours a week. City must write and approve ordinance that allows for automotive, photo enforcement. When the Registered Owner of the vehicle is willing to sign an affidavit, stating that he/she was not driving the vehicle at the time of the infraction the ticket is dismissed. Revenue: As an example, if an approach has 10,000 vehicles a day, has a minimum of 120 violations a month, (4 violations a day) with approximately 80% of fines paid, and $4,400.00 to the vendor, an amount of approximately $5,200.00 would be collected for the city. As applied to. the intersection of l" Avenue S. & S 348`h St, with an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) count in each direction, amounting to 9500, 16,000, 7500 and 16,000 vehicles per, approach respectively, at four violations each day per 10,000 vehicles, this would amount to approximately 588 violations, per month. If 80% of the fines are paid, this would amount to approximately $47,040 collected. The vendor derives. $4,400.00 for each approach ora, total of $17,600 is paid to them for this intersection. Therefore, $29,440 would be collected for the city each month. The intersection of' 21" Ave S. and S. 336`h has a very similar ADT, resulting in similar revenue. This acquired revenue does not take into account the amount of resources spent by city staff from Public Works, Legal, Police and Courts, which needs to be researched further. Additionally, according to one vendor, the violations could reduce by as much as 40% after the first 6 months of implementation of program due to drivers voluntarily complying with traffic signals. Recommendations • If adopted all impacted or vested parties, including but not limited to representation from the City Council, Public Works, Courts, Police, Finance and MIS, to participate in a study committee to further research and understand the capabilities and impacts. • RFP is written and distributed to competing companies • City ordinance is written and adopted • That revenue generated from this type of technology is used to further enhance and increase Traffic Safety Enforcement and Traffic Education within the city. 3 E _� SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION TO PURCHASE K-9 BALLISTIC VEST POLICY QUESTION: Should the City approve the acceptance offunds collected by a Federal Way business, (Crestwood Animal Hospital), to cover the costs of purchasing a ballistic vest for our Generalist Police Tracking Dog, "Roscoe"? COMMITTEE: Parks, Recreation, and Public Safety Council Committee MEETING DATE: September 11, 2006 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: STAN MCCALL, Patrol Commander DEPT: Police Department Attachments: 1. PR&PS Committee Memo 2. E-mail from Doctor Randall Norstrem, D.V.M., Crestwood Animal Hospital. Options Considered: 1. Accept the private donated funds, amounting to approximately $1,700.00 to cover the cost of a ballistic vest for Federal Way Generalist K-9 Dog. Crestwood Animal Hospital has independently collected donated funds to cover the cost for this purchase, which is approximately $1,700.00.dollars. 2. Reject acceptance of grant. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option 1. Accept the donation from Crestwood Animal Hospital CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:ffa DIRECTOR APPROVAL: /� Ko n Council mnuttee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: PRPS recommends Option _ be accepted and forwards to Full Council for Approval on September 19, 2006 Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move that the Council accept donated funds from Crestwood Animal Hospital for the purchase of a ballistic vest for our Federal Way Police Department Generalist K-9 Dog. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED 1ST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION # Ali CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: September 11, 2006 TO: Parks, Recreation, and Public Safety Council Committee VIA: Neal Beets, City Manager FROM: Brian Wilson, Interim Chief of Police wR[Axe SUBJECT: Acceptance of Donation for K-9 Ballistic Vest Back ori und: The owner and employees of Crestwood Animal Hospital in Federal Way have been collecting funds from their patients, clients and staff since April to help off -set the cost of purchasing a ballistic vest for our Generalist Tracking K-9 Dog, Roscoe. It has been our desire and plan to equip our Generalist Tracking dog with a custom fitted ballistic vest for his protection. Providing this type of protection is the standard practice for law enforcement agencies throughout the country. Our Generalist Tracking dog, Roscoe, was purchased in 2005 and completed his formal training in December of last year. Because Roscoe is still very young, we were waiting for him to achieve some additional growth before fitting him with a ballistic vest. The time has now come for the Federal Way Police Department to fit and purchase a ballistic vest for Roscoe. The vendor we have chosen supplies excellent quality custom fitted ballistic vests for police dogs and has supplied this protective equipment to other K-9 teams in our area. The estimated cost for a custom fit K-9 ballistic vest is approximately $1,700.00 dollars. The Crestwood Animal Hospital has collected sufficient funds to cover this purchase. The Police Department requests that the City Council accept donated funds from the Crestwood Animal Hospital to be used for the purchase of a ballistic vest for our Generalist Tracking dog, Roscoe. Prepared by: Commander Stan McCall V-2- Page 1 of 1 Stan McCall - Re: K9 vest From: Randy Luther <templariidvm@yahoo.com> To: Scott Orta <Scott.Orta@cityoffederalway-com> Date: Monday, June 26, 2006 5:43 PM Subject: Re: K9 vest Hi Officer Orta Sounds like Roscoe is doing well! We'd love to meet him. This week, our schedule is a little off, due to summer and all. Next week, Wednesday night, between 7 and 8 would be a great time to meet Roscoe and yourself. Wednesday nights are usually better than Tuesdays. Money continues to trickle in for the vest, so it looks like between the donations from my clients and our hospital, we'll purchase the vest for Rosoe without a problem. Just let us know when,and all the details. Give Roscoe a pet for us! Sincerely Dr Randy Norstrem Reward Excellence NOT Existence non nobis, Domine ... "All it takes for evil to triumph is for a good man to do nothing" Et dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. Do you Yahoo!? Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta. file://C:\Documents and Settings\default\Local Settings\Temp\GWJ0000l.HTM 8/16/2006 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 19, 2006 ITEM #: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF THREE ADDITIONAL ITRONIX LAPTOP COMPUTERS FOR MARKED POLICE PATROL FLEET. POLICY QUESTION: SHOULD THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PURCHASE THREE ADDITIONAL ITRONIX LAPTOP COMPUTERS/ MOBILE DISPATCH COMPUTER FOR MARKED POLICE PATROL VEHICLES? COMMITTEE: PR&PS COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: September 11, 2006 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: QUARTERMASTER TIFFANY KRUSEY DEPT: Public Safety Attachments: 1. PR&PS Committee Memo 2. Microsoft Excel sheet outlining current Itronix laptop computer utilization. Options Considered: 1. Purchase the Three Additional Itronix Laptop Computers for Marked Police Vehicles using $10,000 from the 2005 JAG Grant (WI -FI) and the remaining $6,000.00 from the 2006 JAG Grant (Docking Station) 2. Do not purchase the Additional Itronix Laptop Computers; however, once we install the Itronix Laptops in the last Five Patrol Cars, we will not have any spares. If any one or more of our Patrol Car Laptops becomes inoperable, the entire vehicle is taken out of service and could potentially remain out of service for several weeks STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council Accept Option 1: agree to the purchase of three additional Itronix laptop computers for marked police patrol vehicles using $10,000.00 from the 2005 JAG grant (WI -FI) and the remaining $6,000.00 from the 2006 JAG grant (Docking Station). CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: Council DIRECTOR APPROXAL: Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: PRPS RECOMMENDS OPTION # BE ACCEPTED AND FORWARDS THE AGREEMENT TO FULL COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL ON SEPTEMBER 19, 2006. Committee Chair Committee Member L---7 -1 Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: `I move approval of the purchase of three additional Itronix Laptop computers for marked police patrol vehicles. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED 1sT reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION # L -1-Z CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: September 11, 2006 TO: Parks, Recreation, and Public Safety Council Committee VIA: Neal Beets, City Manager FROM: Brian Wilson, Interim Chief of Police/ jam, oww SUBJECT: Purchase of Three Additional Itronix Laptop Computers for Marked Police Patrol Fleet. Background: In the year 2003 the City of Federal Way, Department of Public Safety began to purchase Itronix laptop computers (Mobile Dispatch Computers), as replacement for the Panasonic Toughbook laptop computers. Since that time The City of Federal Way has continued to purchase the Itronix laptop computers, phasing out department use of the Panasonic Toughbooks. Currently the Department of Public Safety is operating the marked police patrol fleet with forty-five Itronix laptop computers. The Department of Public Safety is operating the remaining five marked police patrol fleet vehicles with Panasonic Toughbooks, which are not currently supporting all of our technological needs. The Itronix laptop computers and the Panasonic Toughbook computers can not utilize the same power supply to provide power from the car to the computer. The City of Federal Way, Department of Public Safety currently has five spare Itronix which are used when a marked police patrol vehicle has an inoperable Itronix laptop computer. If we were to use the remaining five Itronix laptop computers in our inventory, the marked police patrol fleet would be completely outfitted with Itronix, yet leaving no spare computers. There is a need for a minimum of three spare Itronix computers, one per shift. When a problem arises with an Itronix, without a spare to replace it, the entire vehicle is taken out of service. The vehicle, without an Itronix could essentially be out of service for several weeks. By adding three additional Itronix laptop computers to our inventory allows us to keep vehicles in service while broken computers are repaired. Additionally, purchasing three Itronix computers streamlines the patrol officer's technological needs in the field, hence eliminating the technological and power supply issues that the Panasonic Toughbooks create. Prepared by: Quartermaster Tiffany Krusey 633 2000 Crown Vic SRO 639 2001 Crown Vic SRO 640 2001 Crown Vic SRO 642 2001 Crown Vic SRO 643 2001 Crown Vic PRO -ACT 644 2001 Crown Vic PRO -ACT 645 2001 Crown Vic SRO 646 2001 Crown Vic MALL 648 2001 Crown Vic TRAFFIC/LT 649 2002 Crown Vic DAYS 652 2002 Crown Vic SWINGS 653 2002 Crown Vic DAYS 654 2002 Crown Vic GRAVES 655 2002 Crown Vic SWINGS 656 2002 Crown Vic DAYS 657 2003 Crown Vic DAYS 658 2003 Crown Vic DAYS 659 2003 Crown Vic K-9/SWINGS 661 2003 Crown Vic SWINGS 662 2003 Crown Vic GRAVES 902 1997 Ford E250 TRANSPORT 903 1998 Ford Wind Speedwatch 904 1992 Chev SV SRT 905 1984 Chev Tk Crime Scene 906 2002 Chev Exp All Hazards 5032 2005 Crown Vic SWINGS 5112 2005 Crown Vic DAYS 6012 2005 Crown Vic GRAVES 6022 2005 Crown Vic DAYS 6032 2005 Crown Vic GRAVES 6043 2005 Crown Vic DAYS 6052 2005 Crown Vic SWINGS 6062 2005 Crown Vic SWINGS 6072 2005 Crown Vic DAYS 6082 2006 Crown Vic GRAVES 6092 2006 Crown Vic SWINGS 6102 2006 Crown Vic GRAVES 6112 2006 Crown Vic GRAVES 6122 2006 Crown Vic SWINGS 6132 2006 Crown Vic DAYS 6142 2006 Crown Vic GRAVES 6152 2006 Crown Vic SWINGS 6162 2006 Crown Vic DAYS 6172 2006 Crown Vic SWINGS 6182 2006 Crown Vic DAYS 6192 2006 Crown Vic SWINGS 6202 2006 Crown Vic SWINGS 6212 2005 Chev Tahoe GRAVES 6251 2004 Crown Vic K-9/GRAVES 6261 2004 Crown Vic GRAVES 6332 2006 Crown Vic GRAVES 6360 2005 Crown Vic DAYS 9001 2004 FordEon35C TRANSPORT 9011 2005 Crown Vic GRAVES 9061 2006 Ford E350 Bomb Van COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 19, 2006 ITEM #: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Washington Traffic Safety Commission Grant - Advanced Collision Investigation Training POLICY QUESTION: Should the City approve the acceptance of a $13, 000.00 training grant provided by the Washington State Traffic Commission, which would cover all costs to host an advanced collision investigation course, "Human Factors in Traffic Crash Reconstruction "? COMMITTEE: Parks, Recreation, and Public Safety Council Committee MEETING DATE: September 11, 2006 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ . City Council Business STAFF REPORT BY: Connie E. Attachments: 1. PRPS Committee Memo 2. Class Announcement 3. MOU — WTSC 4. Grant Request 5. IPTM Agreement ❑ Ordinance ❑ Resolution Traffic Lieutenant ❑ Public Hearing ❑ Other DEPT: Police Department Options Considered: 1. Accept the WTSC grant, amounting to but not exceeding $13,000.00 to cover all costs of class. Hosting this 40 -hour course would also provide training to all (5) Traffic officers at no cost to the City. WSTC will cover all costs incurred up to and including a total of $13,000.00 2. R ect_ acceptance of grant. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option 1, to accept the WTSC Grant CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: Ej _ DIRECTOR APPR VAL: Co ee Council �. l�M ¢Il, /� Conunittee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: PRPS recommends Option _ be accepted and forwards to Full Council for approval on September 19, 2006. Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: `I move approval of the WTSC grant for the advanced collision investigator training "Human Factors in Traffic Crash Reconstruction ". (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED IST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION # �I- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: September 11, 2006 TO: Parks, Recreation, and Public Safety Council Committee VIA: Neal Beets, City Manager FROM: Brian Wilson, Interim Chief of Police AV11v`` 011 /Ap SUBJECT: WTSC Training Grant Back ogr und: The Washington Traffic Safety Commission Grant will allow the Federal Way Police Department, to host a Regional Advanced Traffic Investigations Training Course, which provides valuable training to Traffic Officers in the Region who are tasked with investigating major traffic collisions. The grant will cover the cost of the instructor, lodging and tuition of all attendees, and provide training to all (5) FWPD Traffic Officers at no cost to the city. The total amount of the training and cost of the course can meet but not exceed $13,000.00, all to paid by WTSC. The 40 hour training is a highly sought after advanced training that is normally held at the Institute of Police Technology and Management, ITPM in Jacksonville, Florida, which to send one FWPD Traffic Officer, would cost nearly $2,000.00. Accepting this grant and being the host site for this type of training will bring 25 additional Traffic Investigators from other Police Departments in the Region. Hosting this training will be the first of this type and will identify the Federal Way Police Department as one of the leaders in the Region for advanced training and will further , establish our location as a possible host sight for additional training in the area, which is being considered by IPTM and WSTC. VA -2 ********** TRAINING ANNOUNCEMENT ********** ATTENTION COLLISION INVESTIGATORS/TRAFFIC UNITS HUMAN FACTORS INVESTIGATION COURSE Presented by IPTM Taught by Patrick Robins Will be held in FEDERAL WAY, WA SEPTEMBER 18 -229 2006 Lodging, Course Tuition & Fees are provided courtesy of the WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION (in accordance with WA State Lodging Per Diem Policy) Transportation and Meals are the Participant's Responsibility. Student Prerequisites EXPERIENCED Advanced Collision Investigation certification THIS COURSE IS LIMITED TO 30 STUDENTS Multiple respondents from the same agency will be considered, but not assured on a first come bases. REGISTRATIONS MUST BE RECEIVED BY SEPTEMBER 6, 2006 Please contact by phone or e-mail: Federal Way Police Department Officer Ron Potts, 253-835-6839(voice Mail) (M -Th 0700-1700) If you call outside my normal business hours please leave a detailed message on how to contact you with a good phone number and the best time to call you. In case of an emergency you can leave a message for Lt. Shupp at 253-835-6726 Ron.Potts@cityoffederalway.com Include your full name, agency, position, telephone number, email address, and Collision Investigator level Information packages will be sent to the accepted participants. N__3 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION THIS AGREEMENT, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW is made and entered into in July 28, 2006 by and between the Federal Way Police Department (FWPD) and the Washington Traffic Safety Commission (WTSC). IT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT to assist WTSC in a project titled: "IPTM Human Factors Training September 18-22, 2006" IT IS, THEREFORE, MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: 1. The Federal Way Police Department (APD) will submit a detailed work plan containing a scheduled of planned activity, a budget plan not to exceed $13,000 for the completed project. This plan. shall include, specific date of training, and outlined registration and class participation approval process. Instructor fees, classroom rental fees, equipment fees, lodging fees for students, classroom refreshment fees and any other budget items needed to complete the project. WTSC reserves the right to select/ approve individual student attendance. 2. WTSC will provide written approval of the detailed work plan and funding availability before activity begins. FWPD must submit claims for reimbursement by September 30, 2006). All claims for reimbursement must be received by the WTSC no later than October 15, 2006. Any request for reimbursement received after October 15, 2006 will not be honored by the WTSC. Claims for reimbursement must include: ♦ Invoice Voucher, A19 -1A Form (attached) Please note that we cannot accept a FAX. (We must have your agency identified as the "Claimant", a Federal Tax ID # and an original signature of the agency head, command officer or contracting officer on the A-19 form.); ♦ Payroll support documents (signed overtime slips, payroll documents, etc. and receipts for other expenses outlined in the approved work plan. 3. Disputes arising under this agreement shall be resolved by a panel consisting of one representative of the WTSC, one representative from the FWPD and an agreed upon third party. The dispute panel shall decide the dispute by majority vote. 4. Either party may terminate this agreement upon (30) days written notice to the other party. In the event of termination of this agreement, the terminating party shall be liable for the performance rendered prior to the effective date of termination. 5. I certify that none of the funds for this project supplant the normally budgeted funds of this agency nor do these funds pay for routine traffic enforcement normally provided by this agency. IN WITNESS THEREOF, THE PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. I-t'/)r/l,��L %�/y� /DZ /C'� Contracting Agency (Name) Date/Signatur Date/Washington Traffic Safety Commission Return To: Lynn Drake WTSC PO Box 40944 Olympia, WA 98504-0944 i'( S ` CITY OF �. Federal Way April 27, 2006 Lynn Drake Washington Traffic Safety Commission P.O. Box 40944 Olympia, WA 98505-0944 Dear Lynn Drake, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-6700 www. cityoffederal wa y. com The Federal Way Department of Public Safety Traffic Unit is requesting to host the traffic collision course,. Human Factors. This course is offered by The Institute of Police Technology and Management who have assigned experts to instruct in collision , investigation/human factors course. The following is an excerpt from IPTM's course description and gives a short description of the class. HUMAN FACTORS ITN'. TRAFFIC CRASH RECONSTRUCTION "While many crash investigation courses focus on the interpretation of physical evidence to determine "how" ,:i collision occurred, this course will examine a variety of human factors to determine "why" a collision occurred. This course utilizes lectures, discussions, in -class demonstrations and outside field exercises to give you an appreciation for the importance of human factors in explaining collision causation. You will gain an understanding of how frail human evidence is and why the ability to interpret and analyze physical evidence is critical to the success of any collision investigator. In addition to the driver characteristics that must be considered in an investigation, this course also addresses the nature of perception and reaction., the factors affecting the investigator's choice of perception -reaction values as well as eyewitness reliability." The human factor in the collision investigations is a variable in all collision we investigate from solo vehicle, vehicle; to vehicle and vehicle to pedestrian collision. The more we know about the facts and how to interpret what we find the better our investigations will be and the correct data obtained will be interpreted and presented similarly in all cases. This does not only cover the driver of vehicles but also can be used for the human factor of pedestrians,lbicycle involved in collisions and witnesses. The material covered in this course, which is outlined above, will be very beneficial to the collision investigator when, dealing with the many human factors that a pedestrian, bicyclist, motorcyclist and driver may contribute to the cause of the collision. With such a large population of our community being. children, that walk to school and ride their bicycles, this course would directly relate to the enforcement and collision investigations that occur near and around schools. The IPTM, Assistant to the Director, Cameron Pucci, and the Human Factors instructor Patrick Robbins have been contacted to the availability of a course offering in our region in the fall of this year. Both IPTM and Mr. Robbins agree that a fall presentation would work and after checking all schedules September 18-22, 2006 was found to be open and not in conflict with other IPTM classes and or Mr. Robbins' schedule. The City of Federal Way has a training facility that will accommodate IPTM's limited class size of 30 students, and is available and reserved for the selected week in September. After contacting Mr. Robbins and determining his needs for the classroom instruction and training aids necessary for the field training exercise, our facility and field location meet or exceed all his requirements. In addition to the classroom, Mr. Robbins requested an outdoor location that can be used for a nighttime pedestrian visibility test study. The location has already been identified and secured for the targeted date of instruction, and meets the course requirements. The location is a paved secured road, has no street lighting, has limited access for students, has no public access, and will not impact traffic flow in and around the area. The City of Federal Way is a prime location for regional training of this caliber. The city is centrally located along Interstate 5 and is a short distance from Sea -Tac International Airport. Our city is a population of nearly 90,000 residents with a variety of motel accommodations and eating establishments to support the attendees of the course. Additionally, SR 18 intersects with Interstate 5 in our city, which makes it an excellent location for other law enforcement personnel traveling from Eastern Washington. Motel room rates vary for the LaQuinta, and the Marriott Courtyard for ten rooms with two queen beds at a rate of $130.00 and for Comfort Inn for $65.00 per room per night. The training facility would be in our City Hall, which is conveniently located, with a variety of eating establishments a short distance away, including fast food and seated eating restaurants that would not interfere with class scheduling of a lunch break. Also, a small coffee/snack vendor is located in the lobby of our facility for students use during short breaks during the training. The overall break down of expenses would be as follows. ITPM course $8500.00 Lodging $3250.00 (Ten rooms double queen beds not including tax) Miscellaneous/refreshments $500.00 Total Estimated Cost $12,250.00* as of April 17, 2006 *It is agreed that the total cost of hosting this course will be paid for by the WTSC The Federal Way Department of' Public Safety Traffic Unit Officers will do all coordination of contracts and making all arrangements with the local hotel and coordination thru IPTM/ Mr. Robbins. FWDPS Traffic Unit will provide advertisement, distribute pertinent course information, conduct communication with registered students, provide assistance to the instructor, and will have an audio/video assistant available during all instruction time. We .will provide all directions, maps and informational request made by students, and will provide a point of contact via e-mail and telephone. The FWDPS Traffic Unit will work directly with you and the instructor on the basic qualifications for students who attend, and will fulfill any all necessary requirements that you request related to this course. Please let us know if there are any items or concerns that have not been addressed and we will satisfy your requests. Sincerely, Connie E. Shupp, Lieutenant Traffic Unit #253-835-6726 connie. shupp@cityoffederalway. com I&I AGREEMENT Agreement between The University of North Florida Training and Service Institute, Inc., d/b/a the Institute of Police Technology and Management, Jacksonville, Florida and the Federal Way Police Department, Federal Way, Washington, Vy Providing professional, technical and other services needed in conducting a forty (40) hour training course entitled "Human Factors in Traffic Crash Reconstruction" for a maximum of thirty (30) students. It is agreed that the Institute of Police Technology and Management will provide the following at Federal Way: 1. One instructional program in "Human Factors in Traffic Crash Reconstruction" to commence on September 18, 2006 and conclude on September 22, 2006. 2. Instructional materials prepared at the Institute of Police Technology and Management. 3. Trainee materials prepared for dissemination during the course. 4. An appropriate certificate of completion for each trainee satisfactorily completing the course. 5. Technical assistance required to prepare, conduct and evaluate the course. 6. Training aids and student reference materials. 7. Making all arrangements for obtaining instructors, preparation of the instructor activities, and all other arrangements pertaining to instructor transportation and honoraria. H `� The Federal Way Police Department agrees to pay a total sum of nine thousand dollars ($9,000) to the Institute of Police Technology and Management for conducting this course for a maximum of thirty (30) students. Payment in full will be made within 30 days following completion of the program. Course may be cancelled 30 days prior to start date with no penalty. A 10% cancellation fee will be charged any time thereafter. It is further agreed that the Federal Way Police Department will provide classroom facilities and have available the following audio-visual equipment: Overhead transparency projector 2. Chalk Board/White Board 3. Video cassette player/recorder (1h inch, VHS format) with monitor 4. LCD -PowerPoint projector The nondiscrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11245, as amended be Executive Order 11375, relative to Equal Employment Opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin, and the implementing rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Labor, Veteran's Act 38 USC 4212, Section 503 Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 42 USC 12101, and the University's policy contained in 6C94.015, Florida Administrative Code, relative to Sexual Harassment, are incorporated herein. This contractual agreement agreed to this �7y day of,�1, 2006. Leonard R. Jacob, Director Institute of Police Technology and Management 12000 Alumni Drive Jacksonville, Florida 32224-2645 Shari Shuman, Director The University of North Florida Training And Service Institute, Inc. 4567 St. Johns Bluff Road South Jacksonville, Florida 32224-2645 VATIC) am