LUTC PKT 12-04-2006
City of Federal Way
City Council
Land Use/Transportation Committee
December 4,2006
5:30 p.m.
City Hall
Council Chambers
MEETING AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 20,2006
3. PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes)
4. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. Setting Public Hearing Date for the Street Vacation Request
for a Portion of351h Avenue South
B. Flag Lots Code Amendment
C. Stakeholder Report
Action 5 minlMulkey
Action 10 min/Shull
Information 15 minlMcClung & Roe
5. FUTURE MEETINGS/AGENDA ITEMS
6. ADJOURN
Committee Members
Jack Dovey. Chair
Eric Faison
Dean McColgan
City Staff
Cary M. Roe. PE., Public Works Director
Tina Piety, Administrative Assistant
253-835-2601
G:\LUTClLUTC Agendas (lilt! Summllries J006\/2.04-06 LUTe Agemlruloc
City of Federal Way
City Council
Land Use/Transportation Committee
November 20, 2006
5;30 pm
City Hall
City Council Chambers
MEETING MINUTES
In attendance: Committee Chair Jack Dovey and Committee Member Dean McColgan; 'Committee Member Eric Faison;
Mayor Mike Park; Council Member Jeanne Burbidge; Council Member Linda Kochmar, City Manager Neal Beets;
Public Works Director Cary Roe; Community Development Services Director Kathy McClung; Public Works Deputy
Director Ken Miller; Economic Development Director Patrick Doherty; Senior Planner Lori Michaelson; Surface Water
Manager Paul Bucich; Street Systems Manager Marwan Salloum; Street Engineer Al Emter; Assistant City Attorney
Amy Jo Pearsall; Administrative Assistant II Tina Piety
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Dovey called the meeting to order at 5:42 pm.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The October 16, 2006, minutes were approved.
Moved: McColgan Seconded: Faison
Passed: Unanimously
3. PUBLIC COMMENT
None
4. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. City Center-Core Height Limit Code Amendment
Patrick Doherty provided the background on this item. Council Member Kochmar asked why was there a split
vote by the Planning Commission; i.e. why did people vote no (the vote was four yes and three no)? Mr.
Doherty replied that one Commissioner did not explain why they voted no. The second Commissioner
expressed concern over impacting views and the third Commissioner expressed concern over the adequacy of
the Planned Action EIS, Council Member Kochmar requested that the Planning Cornnussion minutes be
included in the City Council packet. Council Member McColgan asked why increase the height to just 200 feet?
Why not go higher? Chair Dovey asked what would need to happen to also change the height for commercial
buildings. Mr. Doherty replied that in order to increase the height of residential beyond 200 feet and/or to
increase the height for commercial, because of the possible change to the development potential, another
environmental impact statement, or an addendum, would have to be done, including study of traffic impacts. It
might be possible to consider a height increase that would not increase development potential. In that case,
traffic impacts could be studied on a per development approach. When asked, Mr. Roe commented that a
traffic impact study could take four to six months. Mr. Doherty commented it could take nine months for the
entire process. Council Member McColgan asked if a development has to have a certain percentage of
residential. Mr. Doherty replied that residential doesn't have to be a certain percentage. A development could
be commercial up to 145 feet, with all or some of the remaining 200 feet be residential.
Council Member Faison suggested that a code amendment to increase the height of commercial in the city
center core and frame be added to the 2007 work plan. The suggested proposed code amendment should also
consider and review design guidelines.
Moved: McColgan Seconded: Dovey Passed: Unanimously
Committee .PASSED Alternative #3 on to the December 5, 2006, City Council Agenda for first reading.
G:\LUTClLUTC Agendas and Summaries 2006\11-20-06 LUTC Minutes.doc
Land Use/Transportation Committee
Page 2
November 20, 2006
B. BP/BC Code Amendment Update
Lori Michaelson provided the background on this item. Staff is seeking feedback on the staffs
recommendation, which is a little different from what the LUTC originally suggested. The difference is that
rather than merging the Business Park (BP) and Community Business (Be) zones into a single "hybrid" zone,
staff recommends maintaining two separate zones and "core" visions, while updating policies, zoning
regulations, and zone boundaries to address emerging market demand. In addition to other changes, staff
recommends renaming the BP zone to Commercial Enterprise (CE) to reflect the updated purpose and intent
for the BP zone. Council Member Faison commented that he is looking for attractive design that p,reserves
trees and open space. Chair Dovey expressed concern about over sized vehicle uses north of 33611 and that the
proposal may make some current uses nonconforming. Ms. Michaelson replied that staff will perform a
nonconformance analysis to look for and address such issues. Chair Dovey commented th'at the area north of
288th has a view corridor and is lightly developed and may be a good area to increase the height limit to take
advantage of these. He urged staff and council to stretch the~selves and consider even higher heights than
those already discussed. The LUTC feels staff is on the right track and should continue as presented.
C. Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Seven- Year Update Completion Resolution
Kathy McClung provided the background information on this item. She commented that this resolution
recognizes the city's efforts at meeting the Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements.
Movcd: McColgan Seconded: f'aisonPassed: Unanimously
Committec .PASSKD Option 1 on to the December 5, 2006, City Council Consent Agcnda for approval.
D. South 3481h HOV Lanes from 9th Avenue South to Pacific Highway - 85% Design Report
Al Emter provided the background information on this item. Mr. Roe commented that the city was awarded 2.7
million for this project.
Moved: McColgan Seconded: Faison .Passed: lJnanimously
Committee P ASSKD Option 1 on to the December 5, 2006, City Council Consent Agenda for approval.
E. South 373rd Street Bridge Replacement Proiect and WSDOT Interlocal Agreement - 100% Authorization to Bid
Paul Bucich provided the background information for this item. Mayor Park asked if this is the bridge that the
Lloyd's trucks use. Mr. Bucich replied that this is a new bridge to the east of the original one. He commented
that due to this construction, South 373rd will be shut down to through traffic from June 23rd until September 3,
2007. The residents in the area have been made aware of this and will be sent a reminder as the date for the
shut-down approaches.
Moved:M.cColgan Seconded: Faison Passed: Unanimously
Committee PASSED Option I on to the December 5, 2006, City Council Consent Agenda for approval.
F. Pacific Highway South Northbound Left Tum Lanes at South 316th Street - Proiect Acceptance and Retainage
Release
Marwan Salloum provided the background information for this item. There was no discussion.
G. 2007 Right-of-Way Landscaping Maintenance Contact - Bid Award
Marwan Salloum provided the background information for this item. There was no discussion.
H. 2007 Street Sweeping Services Contract - Bid A ward
Marwan Salloum provided the background information for this item. There was no discussion.
Moved: Faison Seconded: McColgan Passed: Unanimously
Committee PASSED Option 1 for items F, G, ~ll1d II on to the December 5, 2006, City Council Consent
Agenda for approval.
G:\LUTClLUTC Agendas and Summaries 2006\11-20-06 LUTC Minules.doc
Land Use/Transportation Committee
Page 3
November 20, 2006
1. Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase III Proiect (South 284'h to Dash Point Road) - 100% Design Status
Report and Authorization to Bid
Marwan Salloum provided the background information for this item. Mr. Roe stated that he felt it was
important to move this item forward because of the bidding climate, even though not all of the right-of-way has
been secured. (The city is still in negotiations with Equilon Enterprises [the Shell gas station at South 2881h
Street].) Council Member Faison asked when the DOT's portion to the north is due to be complete. Mr.
Salloum replied it is anticipated to be completed in November 2007.
Moved: McColgan Seconded: .Faison Passed: Unanimously
Committee PASSED Option 1 on to the Decembel' 5,2006, City Council Consent Agenda for approval.
5. FUTURE MEETING
The next scheduled meeting will be December 4, 2006.
6. ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 6:42 p.m.
G:\LUTC\LUTC Agendas and Summaries 2006\ 11-20-06 LUTC Minules.doc
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: Dec. 19,2006
ITEM #:_
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNciL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: Setting Public Hearing Date for the Street Vacation of a Portion of 35th Avenue South
POLICY QUESTION: Should City Council approve a resolution to set a Public Hearingfor the street vacation.
of a portion of the right of way within 35th Avenue South on January 16th, 2007?
COMMITTEE: Land Useffransportation
MEETING DATE:Dec 4,2006
CATEGORY:
I:8J Consent
D City Council Business
o Ordinance
I:8J Resolution
D
D
Public Hearing
Other
.~!~!.F. RE.~_QRT By: John Mulkey, Street Syste~~~~.ineer ._____..___.._.._.l?EJ.>.!_:. Public Works
Attachments:
1. Staff LUTe memo, resolution, and attachments dated December 4, 2006.
Options Considered: .
1. Approve the Resolution to set the. date and time of a public hearing for the street vacation of a portion of the
right of way within 35th Avenue South at the Jan. 161h, 2007 City Council meeting.
2. Set Public Hearing on an alternative date recommended by the committee.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option 1.
CITY MANAGER ApPROVAL:
~
DIRECTOR ApPROVAL:
~
Committee
Council
Eric Faison, Member
~
Dean McColgan, Member
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: LUTC recommends Option-L
PRO OS MOTION: HI move to approve the Resolution to set the date and time of a public hearing
. for the street vacation of a portion of the righi of way within 35th Avenue South on January 16th, 2007".
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
o APPROVED
tJ DENIED
o TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION
o MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
REVISED - 02/06/2006
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
K:\COUNOL\AGDBILLS\2006\12-19-06 Setting Public Hearing Date for Street Vacation of 35th Avenue South.doc
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
December 4, 2006
Land Use and Transportation Committee
Neal Beets, City Manager
John Mulkey, P.E., Street Systems Engineer
Setting Public Hearing Date for the Street Vacation of a Portion of 35th Avenue South
BACKGROUND:
Mark Edwards and Jeff Wolf have petitioned the City to vacate a portion of 35th Avenue S, located at the
. northwest comer of 35th Avenue S. See the accompanying legal description (Exhibit A) map of the area
to be vacated (Exhibit B) and Vicinity map (Exhibit C) for exact location.
The area is a portion of an original alley that connected 35th Avenue S to 33rd Place S. A portion of the
alley that is 285 feet in length was previously vacated by King County in 1968. The remaining area is
approximately 38 feet in length and is between the lots of the two petitioners and the northwest end of the
cul-de-sac on 35th Avenue S.
The properties abutting the alley are zoned Residential 9.6. The area is listed as single family, High
Density in the Comprehensive Plan. The Petitioners are seeking the street vacation in order to eliminate
un-maintained Right of Way, expand the size of their yards, prevent junk vehicles from being parked in
the area proposed for vacation and the allow for installation ofa fence to secure the area. The area to be
vacated has three (3) abutting private property owners, two lots that abut on the side belonging to the
petitioners and one lot that abuts at a comer. All abutting property owners have signed the petition.
cc: Project File
Day File
K:\LUTC\2006\12-04-06 Request for Street Vaction of 35th Avenue South.doc
Exhibit''''A''
Perimeter of total vacation
Beginning at the most northerly comer of Lot I, Hensetrs First Addition, Volume 62, Page 55, Records of
King County, Washington:
Thence North 28"08'00" East, along the northerly extension of the westerly line of said Lot I, a di~tance of
20.00 feet;
Thence South 61052'00" East, a distance of 20.00 feet to a point on the southerly extension of the westerly
line of said Lot 5, Hensell's First Addition, Volume 62, Page 55, Records of King County, Washington;
Thence South 28"08'00" West, a distance of 10.00 feet;
Thence South 61052'00" East, a distance of 10.83 feet to a point on the northerly extension of the east line
of said Lot I;
Thence South 00057'00" East, a distance of 11.44 feet to the northeast comer of said Lot 1;
Thence North 61052'00" West, along the north li!le of said Lot I, a distance of36.40 feet to the Point of
Beginning.
~.
~
o'\: ~
.'" ;:::.
v,"
..~ '!> '" . b
~ 0 .0
t"'\ b C? 'Y .l:b
."J 'Y .......
~~
<I)~
y
a-
~
:z
o
1"'1
X
:z
C')
~
~
!.Il
::e
.~
~
~
'U
~.
<:s
~.
.~
~
J. WOLF
PARCEL NO. 3258000010
500 '57 '00 "E
1.1.44 '
); - - -- - - - - - - -:- SOO-'57'OO"E
!.Illo
~o
);
~lo
00
35TH AVE. S.
~
:-i --\.
""
~
j
~
~
S1
'"
:-
,
,
,
"-
"-
,.
....
....
....
.....
.....
::e
~
.....
.? .....
.?~s...........
.....
---7' .....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
/
/
/
'"
'"
'"
,.,.
EXHIBIT "'B"
V ACA nON
::t 536 SQ. FT.
Z
a
-t c")
<::::~Q
..........<.,
U>:iS3
..... f11
!TIOJ:-1
t:i~1Tj
:i~a
~.~
;;!~
U>~~
~ -t
~
.::5
- ",...""
-- ....'J
/'
Cramer Northwest Inc.
Surveyors Planners & Engineers
945 N. CENTRAL,
(253)852-4880 (local)
(253)852-4955 (fax)
DRAWN BY: O.B.H. SCALE:
JOB NO.: 2006-101 NTS
STE. #104, KENT, WA 98032
1-(800)251-0189 (toll free)
[-MAil: cni@cramernw.com
SHEET: DATE:
1 OF 1 Wed., Nov. 8, 2006
/
M. EDWARDS
PARCEL NO. 6143600415
.{?
f!i
f./J'
'U
~.
<:s
'>f
.&
~
.....
.....
~:z:: ~
EXHIBIT C N
.. :/-~,7 wt'
J ?-!- ~
~h
~'l ~ ~~n -'
. . ~ .~ ~ ~ ~\
'~ Ftn ~ \ ~~
(T-<frr~ ~ -(,-1 ~ / r. ~
)~I ~. ~J J-.Q 1 c( 1 ~il _ ~ J ~
_ : I I II r;:-1G. J I(''j ~\)) . F rl f-r nIfJ
/" . l l.F ~~~li lP-llh,i '--
/A.. . E r~~0 ~l J',~ ~I. II ~Lr E.
~T ~~; f '>.~ l1~J~Y ~~~ f,y
8112 ~}) ~ B=~ ~(b ~i;:-~R == Th~ rl
~ j1w;:lv'(:;~ J~t ~,?'lS ~ ~ ~'j [
~~ ~n1'~ .'-< =-n ~~]I ~DRd:~/ ~.r;;nlr:L Area Pro~osed
'\-<'~lr~ '~ J,~ X ~,f;-fJ ~/;Y -117 1/ For Vacation
'< -I I I IJ, rt ~ I
~ II 'f ~\Sr'1 ~ ~ j ~ I ,i ~~::J~ ri r.-1 lLmYJ
'- ~~~~ \ ,~\ ) >l ~ \'i7 J
~~,~ ~.r); -\_, l3\ It \ I y / _ ~ 1\. V-
~;-=r- -i~O Y- ~. J I fj' ,..-
"r .::I:::: ~ :u -1 \:L --;-:, .
'\L - V 1-1 ~C?
~'r I I t' 111 :;+ ~ .
~Jf11~ - -;fr . ~
~.- Tl~ ~~.
~WII
. '{. {. ~t
~_ / . E / 0/ 7. /
/
~
CJ)
~r-
<(
I
l-
I/)
M
VICINITY MAP
35TH AVE SOUTH
STREET VACATION
Map made by John Mulkey
. Noie: This map is intended for (Jse as a graphical representation only.
Map Updated Nov 22. 2006
The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as 10 ils aCClJracy. .
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, REGARDING VACATION
OF A.PORTION OF 35TH AVENUE SOUTH, SETTING A
PUBLIC H~RINGFOR THE STREET VACATION.
WHEREAS, a proper petition has been filed requesting
vacation of a portion 35th Avenue South,. at the northerly end of 35th
Avenue S, north of S 336th Street in the City of Federal Way, as
described in Exhibit "A" (legal description) and as depicted on
Exhibit "B" and 'Exhibit C (Vicinity Map) attached hereto;
WHEREAS, the petition contains the signatures of the
owners of at least two-thirds of the property abutting the portion
of 35th Avenue South proposed to be vacated;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL
WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A public hearing on the aforesaid vacation
petition sh~ll be held at the regular meeting of the Federal Way
City Council at 7:00 p.m. on January 16, 2007, in the Council
Chambers in the City Hall, 33325 8th Ave. South, Federal Way,
Washington. Said hearing date is not more than. sixty (60) nor less
than twenty (20) days after the date of the passage of this
resolution.
. Res. #
, Page 1
Sectlon 2. The City Clerk shall give at least twenty
(20) days notice of the hearing and cause the notice to be posted
as provided by law.
Section 3. The Public Works Director shall obtain the
necessary approval or rejection of, or other information from the
City departments, af.fected agencies, and utilities, fire anq. police
agencies, and shall transmit such information to the City Council
so that the matter can be considered by the City Council at the
public hearing on January'16, 2007.
Section 4. Severability If any section, sentence,
clause or phrase Of this resolution should be held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase
of this resolutlon.
Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the
authority and prior to the effective date of the resolution is
hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be
effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council.
Res. #
, Page 2
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,'
WASHINGTON, this
day of
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, MICHAEL PARK
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, LAURA HATHAWAY, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.:
Res. #
, Page 3
, 2006.
Exlribw"-A~ .
Perimeter of total vacation
Beginning at the most northerly comer of Lot I, HenseH's First Addition; Volume 62, Page 55, Records of
Kfug County, Washington:. .
Thence North 28"08'00" East, along the northerly extension of the westerly line of said Lot I, a distance of
20.00 feet;
Thence South 61052'00" East, a distance of20.00 feet to a point on the southerly extension of the westerly
line of said Lot 5, Hensell's First Addition, Volume 62, Page 55, Records of King County, Washington;
Thence South 28"08'00" West, a distance of 10.00 feet;
Thence South 61052 '00" East, a distance of 10,83 feet to a point on the northerly extension of the east line
of said Lot I; .
Thence South 00057'00" East, a distance of 11.44 feet to the northeast comer of said Lot I;
Thence North 61052'00" West; along the north line ofsaid Lot I; a distance ofJ6.40 feet to the Point of
Beginning. .
EXHIBIT "'B"
~
~
o~M
'" "-
. "-
. 0) Vj"
..AU ':!> "- . b
% 0 .0
,,0 C? 'I .~
."J 'i .......
CJ>S'
Cl)t)
Y
0-
~
z
C
rrt
><
Z
C')
c
>-
-4
~
!-Il
:e
J. WOLF
PARCEL NO. 3258000010
~ - - - - - - - - - - ~ 500-'57 'OO'C
!-IlUJ
;:lEa
~
VI
~UJ
. 0
35TH AVE. S.
~.
:-t --,
"->
~
.S:
~
.....
l;1
'"
.:-0-
,
,
,
,
......
......
"
......
....
....
:e
~
~
'"
~
'lJ
~'
<3
~
.~
~
V ACA nON
I536 SQ. FT.
500 .57 '00 'c
11 .44 '
Z
a
-t c)
~~~
(Jj:r!g
I-t I'T1
~ai-l
Cj51?111
~(J)~
:t(J}Q
I-t Z
(Jj~~
(J)~~
55 -t
~
.:5
""
....
---Ar/
'"
Cramer Northwest Inc.
Surveyors Planners & Engineers
945 N. CENTRAL,
(253)852-4880 (local)
(253)852-4955 (fax)
DRAWN BY: O.B.H. SCAL(:
JOB NO.: 2006~ 101 NTS .
STE. #104, KENT, WA98032
1-(800)251-0189 (toll free)
E-MAIL: cni@cramernw.com
SHEET: DATE:
1 OF 1 Wed., Nov. 8, 2006
/
M. EDWARDS
PARCEL NO. 6143600415
~
'"
~
'lJ
~'
<3
'>t'
.~
&
....
....
-tP:Z:: ~
"--""
EXHIBIT C N
1i-,~1' w-*,
i ;~ Qfrl~ s
. ~l~ :).?~~f
, ,4, ~~~~~ Z~\~
I ''7- Ql"' ~ ~ ~ -1Tf \~
_ 11 ",S;J~~fl ~L~AtE f ~= :~~'
f . ~~ ~ = ~ // ~ J~ ) I ~Tl1 - ~ . I
_~ L;Yii E;\\ ".'/ ~lL;(f jL ~ itl Ii Ff" l E'-
Y1[fbJ~ ~~ ~ />)~ uJ..:;:~! ~y J-LL~ flY .
. !P), Q c = _ (.Ji-t:;1.J ). r:L ::I. -, ~ =-......:: =4
_ T1 C 0 '----r' t- \,-' )0 ~- -Ly 'f - L 7.1A J^l
~71~. ~~W'~ W1C;t 1.0S ~I!P L .
. ~~~JO%': ~R~J~~1;f;> -{ &;Jjyr Area Proposed
~~ j fiii --,o;.v -1SZ -;:p ~';?( For Vacation
rill 1 "", ~ -'-J~ ~Vlrt. ~ "1 U~::JI U)~ 4~ \ J
'( X~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c: I I ,U I r1 Va 1 ~
~ '/~lr ~ ~ \ 1 ) R ~ I ~
'~:-"0~ -l- 1J ~ /~ f U il./?
"'-11 f IJ-' ~ ~~ {--I ~l 'a .---J AfJP'
~~ -~~J ~ \ I v / c- t4J~ LIV:
~;-=r- ~~ ~lJ y.1 ~ I F
~ ~= 'flu 'i' \:L, ~-:: ~ ji0 '(Ly-J
,,\'r I I::' -rrl _~;"
~ll1- _ dT !:J
~ - I IJ -IV
~~1' ' ~r I~
y. p-' Arp t
~/ oJ
, :./r/'///
/.
l/)
~-
.<(
J:
I-
'"
M
VICINITY MAP
35TH AVE SOUTH
STREET VACATION
Map made by John Mulkey
Noie: This map is intended. for use as a graphical representation only.
Map Updated Nav 22, 2006
. The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as 10 its accuracy.
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 19,2006
ITEM #:
-...--.-.--..----.---..--.-...--......---..........--...-....."........----............-.---.....-.........................--.---..----...............---.---------.....--....----..-..-....
. . .
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
. .
SUBJECT: Amendments to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Article I, "Definitions"; Article XI,
"District Regulations" (Single Family Residential [RS] and Multifamily Residential [RM] Zoning Charts);
and Article XIII, "Supplementary District Regulations."
POLICY QUESTION: Should the City approve amendments to the FWCC, Chapter 22 regarding flag lots?
COMMITTEE: LUTC
MEETING DATE: December 19,2006
CATEGORY:
D Consent
D City Council Business
rg) Ordinance
D Resolution
D
D
Public Hearing
.other
STAFF REpORT By: Jan~!_~ull, AJ~P, Co.!!!!:!!.~.PI~_~~_______._~~~!~_~~~~~~~ Development
Planning Division staff conducted a review of how existing development regulations should be applied to "flag lots" and
prepared recommended amendments to FWCC Chapter n ("Zoning"), including defmitions of flag lots, lot area, panhandle
lot, primary vehil;:ular access, and property line; adding illustrations for setback requirements for flag lots; modifying Use
Zone Charts Section 22-631, Section 22-648, Section 22-666, and Section 22-667 to clarify side-yard setbacks for comer lots
and adding a note regarding calculation oflot coverage for flag lots; and adding a clarification to Section 22-955 regarding lot
coverage calculations for flag lots. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on November 8, 2006, and
recommended to the council approval of these recommended code amendments.
Attachments: November 20,2006, Memorandum to the Land Use Transportation Committee (LUTe) with Exhibits 1-3.
Options Considered: Modification of the recommended amendments to the FWCC; no amendments to the FWCC
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council approve the recommended amendments to the FWCC.
DIRECTOR ApPROVAL:
-*c..,
Connnittee
~
CITY MANAGER ApPROVAL:
Eric Faison, Member
PROP S Co ClL MOTION: "] move approval of the proposed code amendments, which are attached as Exhibit A to
the adoption ordinance to second reading and enactment at the next regular Council meeting on January 2, 2007. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
o APPROVED
o DENIED
o TA~LEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION
o MOVED TO SECOND.READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #I
1ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #I
RESOLUTION #I
File #06-105059-00-UP
Doc ID 38896
~
CITY OF ~
Federal Way
PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
November 20,2006
To:
Jack Dovey, Chair
. Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTe)
Neal Beets, City Manager W. , .
Kathy McClung, Director of Community Devel6pme~t Services ~
Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner '/WIt' .of Jj.
Janet Shull, AICP, Contract Planner ~ e.. ,..
Amendments to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Article I,
"Definitions"; Article XI, "District Regulations" (Single-Family Residential RS
and Multifamily Residential RM Zoning Charts); and Article XIII,
"Supplementary District Regulations." Files #06-105059-00-UP/06-105060-SE
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEETING DATE: December 4, 2006
I. BACKGROUND
The Community Development Services Department staff is proposing amendments to the zoning code
(FWCC Chapter 22) in order to clarify how "flag lots" are defined, and how typical setback
requirements are to be appiied to proposed residential development on flag lots; The City of Federal
Way zoning code does not currently provide specific direction as to how lot size and lot coverage
calculations are determined for flag lots, nor how front, side, and rear setback requirements are to be
applied to these irregularly shaped lots. In addition, staff is proposing new language in the single-
family (RS) and multifamily (RM) use zone charts to clarify how setback requirements are applied to
comer lots.
Staff prepared draft amendments to the FWCC for consideration by the Planning Commission at a
November 8, 2006, public hearing. The staff report for the November 8, 2006, Planning Commission
Meeting with Exhibits A-G is enclosed as Exhibit 1 and minutes for that meeting as Exhibit 2.
II. . SUMMARY OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS/PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION
. The following is a summary ofthe proposed FWCC amendments (Exhibits A-G of Exhibit I) as
presented to the Planning Commission. Proposed new language is shown as underline and
language proposed to be deleted is shown as strikeout.
A. Modify FWCC Section 22-1 to add definitions for "flag lot," "lot area," and "panhandle
lot," and modify existing definitions for "primary vehicular access" and "property line"
(Exhibit A Of 1).
The attached Exhibit A of 3 provides draft language for a proposed definition of "flag lot." Since
the term "panhandle lot" is also commonly used to describe the same type of lot configuration, it
is recommended that a listing for panhandle lot be added to the definitions section with a cross-
reference to flag lot.
A new definition of "lot area" is proposed that clarifies that the access easement or "flag pole"
portion of a flag lot is not considered in calculating minimum lot area.
A modification to the definition of "primary vehicular access" is proposed to include "vehicular
access easement or private tract" in the definition. This is necessary as it relates to how setback
requirements are determined for flag lots.
A modification to the existing definition of "property line" is proposed that will clarify how
front, side, and rear setback requirements are to be applied to comer lots and flag lots.
B. Modify FWCC Section 22~1 to add graphics illustrating the application of setback
requirements to flag lots (Exhibit Bof 1).
Exhibit B of 3 illustrates how setback requirements are to be applied to flag lots. The different
examples are provided to address the potential relationship between flag lot configuration and
the right-of-way the flag lot is connected to via an access easement or driveway.
C. Modify FWCC Use Zone Chart Section 22-631, Detached Dwelling Units inRS Zone"; Use
Zone Chart Section 22-648, "Accessory Dwelling Units in RS Zone"; Use Zone Chart
Section 22-666, "Detached Dwelling Units in RM Zone"; and Use Zone Chart Section 22-
667, "Attached, Detached and Stacked Dwelling Units in RM Zone" to clarify side yard
setbacks for corner lots and add a note regarding exceptions to calculation of lot coverage
(Exhibits C-F of 1).
Exhibits C-F of 3 show proposed amendments to existing use zone charts for single-family and
multifamily development to provide clarification as to how side yard setbacks are calculated for
comerJots. The side yard setback for that portion of the lot adjacent to a right-of-way that is not
utilized as the primary vehicular access is 10 feet.
The second proposed change to the use zone charts is a note that the method for calculating lot
coverage for flag lots is found In FWCC Section 22~955.
D. Modify FWCC Section 22-955 to clarify that the flag pole portion of a flag lot is not
considered in lot.coverage calculations (Exhibit G of 1).
III. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on November 8, 2006. After the close of the
public hearing, the Planning Commission discussed the staff recommendations and recommended
approval of the staff recommendation to the City Council.
Flag Lot Code Amendments
Planning Commission Recommendation to LUTC
1:\2006 Code Amendments\Flag Lots\LUTC\120406 Meeting\PC Rec Staff Report to LUTC.doc
File #06-105059-UP/Doc ID 38897
Page 2
The Planning Commission Recommendation is shown in Exhibits A-G of Exhibit 1.
IV. ADDITIONAL CHANGES PROPOSED BY STAFF
Staffhas made one change to FWCC Chapter 22, Article XI, "District Regulations"'as shown in.
Exhibits C-F of Exhibit 3, purely for clarification purposes. The note added to the zone charts has
been changed to more specifically reference Section 22-955(b)(2), instead of Section 22-955, to make
it clear that the note pertains only to flag lots. This new change is shown as double underline. The
intent of the previous amendments as presented to the Planning Cornrirission at their November 8,
2006, public hearing has not changed.
V. LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE OPTIONS/STAFF RECOMMENDATION
.,
The Committee has the following options:
1. Recommend that the full Council adopt an ordinance approving the proposed code amendments
as recommended by the Planning Commission and the additional changes related to references to
lot coverage calculations in use zone charts proposed by staff. (These changes are discussed in
Section IV of this staff report and shown as double underline. in Exhibits C..F of Exhibit 3).
2. Recommend that the full Council modify and then approve the proposed code amendments.
3. Recommend that the full Council disapprove the proposed code amendments.
Staff recommends that the LUTC recommend to the full Council Option No. 1 above, that is, adoption
of the Planning Commission Recommendation with the additional staff changes.
V. LAND USEITRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The LUTC forwards the proposed amendment to the full Council for first reading as follows:
As recommended by Planning Commission, including additional staff changes.
As recommended by Planning Cornrirission (including additional staff changes) and
amended by the LUTC
1'.~lc'T@F;@~M4fl~JfJE A@~](J)N' -- ~~~f.:~~l;~,', -{~~)\iF~ ~"~-----l
~l~:...','".,~,...:,"~,'...o.,.~.,.." .. ., ,. ,'::o;~'~..~,...',:.,;.'..,~,~...'.~,.~..':.'.~::,:,.:.,............. ':; " . J.~,,::\.;~~;.. ' · c' J
' . . t '. '. . . ...' :':~:'it.~'.,~f:l.:~\}f;;::j1}\>, ... . . ... ~..'.'. ...~.
. .' m1'lC <RalSQn~~!;;.!)~:: .::. :'t;.,L~::': n>ean MuG:)olgan. Mel1].Jp~eJi.~'--;.~.~:...::....
Flag Lot Code Amendments
Planning Commission Recommendation to LUTC
1:\2006 Cbde Amendments\Flag Lots\LUTC\1 20406 Meeting\PC Rec Staff Report to LUTC.doc
File #06. 1 05059-UP/Doc ID 38897
Page 3
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
Exhibit 3
Staff Report for the November 8, 2006, Planning Commission Meeting with Exhibits A-G
Minutes of the November 8, 2006, Planning Commission Meeting
Draft Adoption Ordinance with Exhibit A
Flag Lot Code Amendments
Planning Commission Recommendation to LUTC
]:\2006 Code Amendments\Flag Lots\LUTC\120406 Meeting\PC Rec Staff Report to LUTC.doc
File #06-105059-UP/Doc ID 38897
Page 4
'~
.~
CITY OF ... 0
Federal Way
EXHIBIT
PAGE ,
J
OF-6
..
---
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
Proposed Flag Lot Development Standards
Amendments to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22
Article I, "Definitions," Article XI, "I:>istrict Regulations" (Single-Family
Residential'RS and Multifamily Residential RM Zoning Charts), and
. Article XIII, "Supplementary District Regulations"
File No. 06-10S0S9~OO-UP I 06-10S060-SE .
Public Hearing of November 8, 2006
I. BACKGROUND
The Communio/ Development Services Department staff is proposing amendments to the zoning code
(Federal Way City Code [FWCC] Chapter 22) inordet to Clarify how "flag lots" are defined, and how
typicai setback requirements are to be applied to proposed single-family development on flaglots~
The City of Federal Way zoning code does not currently provide specific direction as to how lot size
and lot coverage calcu.lations are determined for flag lots, nor how front, side, and rear. setback
requirements are to be applied to these irregularly shaped lots. In addition, staff is proposing new
language in the single-family (RS) and multifamily (RM) use zone charts to clarify how setback
requirements are applied to comer lots.
.. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-520(b), the'City Council may review city-initiated changes to the text
of the zoning code from time to time at the council's discretion. The Planning Commission is being
asked to review the proposed changes to the zoning code and forward a recommendation to the city
council. The following staff-proposed zoning text amendments are addressed in this staff report:
I. Modify FWCC Section 22-1 to add definitions for "flag lot," "lot area," and "pan
handle lot"; and modify existing definitions for "primary vehicular access" and
"property line" (Exhibit A).
n. Modify FWCC Section 22-1 to add graphics illustrating the application of setback
requirements to flag lots (Exhibit B).
m. Modify FWCC Sec.tion 22-631, use'zone chart for detached dwelling units in RS zone,
. to clarify side-yard setbacks for comer lots and add a note regarding calculation of lot
coverage for flag lots (Exhibit C).
N. Modify FWCC Section 22-648, use zone chart for accessory,dwelling units in RS zone,
to clarify side-yard setbacks for comer lots and add a note regarding calculation of lot.
coverage for flag lots (Exhibit D); . .
V. Modify FWCC Section22-666, use zone chart for detached dwelling units in RM zone,
to clarify side-yard setbacks for comer lots and add a note regarding calculation of lot
coverage for flag lots (Exhibit E). .
Flag Lot DevClopment Standards - Code Amendments
Planning Commission Staff Report
File#06-I05059-00-UP I Doc 10 38628
Page I
EXHIBIT , - --, ~'_
PAGEiOF -5...-.:
VI. Modify FWCC Section 22-667, use zone chart for attached, detached, and stacked
dwelling units in RS zone, to clarify side-yard setbacks for comer lots and add a note
regarding calculation of lot coverage for flag lots (Exhibit F).
VII. Modify FWCC Section 22-955 to clarify that the "flag pole" portion of a flag lot is not
considered in lot coverage calculations (Exhibit G).
Summary of Findings and Recommendations
· The City of Federal Way is experiencing numerous requests for subdivision of parcels into flag
lots where one or two parcels are located behind a lot With traditional right-of-way frontage. These
flag lots are accessed. via an access easement or driveway.
· The City of Federal Way currently does not have a defmition of flag lot in the zoning code.
· The FWCC does not currently address how front, side, and rear yard setback requirements are to
be applied to flag lots (lots that are not adjacent to a right-of-way).
· The FWCC does not currently specify how front, side, and rear yard requirements should be
applied to comer lots (lots that are adjacent to more than one primary .vehicular access).
· Application of a maximum lot coverage calculation for flag lots is not addressed in the FWCC.
· Currently, application of setback and lot coverage.requirements for development of flag lots is
handled administratively on a "case-by-case" basis. This translates into more review time for staff,
as well as a sense of uncertainty for the applicant.
· Modifying FWCC Chapter 22 to add a definition for flag lots and lot area, and modifying existing
use zone charts to clarify how setback and lot coverage requirements shall be applied to flag lots,
will lend greater predictability to the application of development standards for flag lots in future
development proposals. .
· Modifying FWCC Chapter 22 to modify the existing definition for property line and modifying
existing use zone charts to clarify how setback requirements shall be applied to corner lots will
lend greater predictability to the application of development standards for corner lots in future
development proposals.
D. PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENTS
A. Recommended Amendments.to Article I Definitions (Exhibit A)
The attached Exhibit A provides draft language for a proposed definition of flag lot. Since the
term "panhandle lot" is also commonly used to describe the same type of lot configuration, it is
recommended that a listing for panhandle lot be added to the definitions section with a cross-
reference to flag lot. .
A new definition of "lot area" is proposed that clarifies that the access easement or "flag pole"
portion of a flag lot is not considered in calculating minimum lot area.
Flag Lot Development Standards - Code Amendments
Planning Commissi.on.Staff Report
File #06-105059-OO-UP I Doc 10 38628
Page 2
EXHIBIT , ..,.
PAGE~OF--,---=
A modification to the definition of "primary vehicular access" is proposed to include "vehicular
access easement or private tract" in the definition. This is necessary as it relates to how setback
r~quirements are determined for flag lots.
A modification to the existing definition of "property line" is proposed that will clarify how
front, side, and rear setback requirements are to be applied to comer lots and flag lots.
B. Recommended Exhibit to Illustrate Flag Lot Setbacks (Exhibit B)
A, draft exhibit has been prepared that illustrates how the proposed setback requirements are to
be applied to flag lots. The different examples are provided to address the potential relationship
between flag lot configuration arid the right-of-way the flag lot is connected to via an access
easement or driveway.
Where a flag lot is created with access via easement or driveway to an arterial or primary
collector, "Lot 1," as depicted in the examples, must be accessed via the access easement that
also serves as the driveway for the flag lot. Where the flag lot is not connected to an arterial or
primary collector, then Lot 1 may be accessed either via the adjacent right-of':'way, or via the
access easement that also serves the fl'ag lot.
The last example shows how access is provided to lots where a flag lot is the third lot back from
the street. This configuration is only possible where Lot 1. fronts a street that is not designated an
arterial of primary collector. This is because Lot 1 must have direct access to the adjacent street.
No more than two lots (in this case Lots 2 and 3) may have access from the access easement.
In each example, the front yard is considered to be the yard that fronts the "primary vehicular
access. "
C. Recommended Modification to Existing Use Zone Charts to Clarify Setback Requirements
for Flag Lots and CornerLots,.and Clarify Lot Coverage Requirement for Flag Lots
(Exhibits C-F)
The proposed modifications to existing use zone charts for single-family and multifamily
development provide clarification as to how side-yard setbacks are calculated for comer lots. Side
yard setbacks for tl;te portion of the lot adjacent to a right-of-way that is not utilized as the primary
vehicular access is 10 feet. OtherWise the traditional five-foot side yard setback will apply.
The second proposed charige to the use zone charts is a note that cross-references Section 22-
955 for calculating lot coverage for flag lots.
D. Recommended Modification to FWCC Section 22-955 to Clarify Lot Coverage Calculation
for Flag Lots (Exhibit G)
The last proposed modification is to add language to Section 22-955, "Calculating Lot
Coverage," that clarifies that the flag pole portion of a lot will not be considered in determining
compliance with the maximum lot coverage calculation.
Flag Lot Development Standards - Code Amendments
Planning Commission Stan: Report
. File #06-105059-OO-UP I Doc ID .38628
Page 3 .
EXHIBIT ~_ ___., _
PAGE___OF~=
Staff recommends that the following be recommended for approval to the City Council:
1. Amendments to FWCC Section 22-1, "Definitions," to add a definition of flag lot and
lot area, and modify definitions for primary vehicular access, and property line;
2. An amendment to FWCC Section 22-1, "Definitions," to add an exhibit illustrating
how setback requirements shall be applied to flag lots;
3. . A modification to FWCC Sections 22-631, 22-648, 22-666, and 22-668 to clarify
side-yard setbacks for'corner lots and add a note regarding calculation of lot coverage
for flag lots; and
4. A modific~tion to FWCC Section 22-955, "Calculating Lot Coverage,1' to establish
that the. portion of a lot that is located within the flag pole or access panhandle part of
the lot will not be used or considered in determining compliance with the maximum
lot coverage requirement.
IV. REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
FWCC Chapter 22, ~'Zoning," Article IX, "Process VI Review," establishes a process and criteria for
zoning code text amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the role of the Planning Commission
is as follows:
1. To review and evaluate the zoning code text regarding any proposed amendments.
2. To determine whether the proposed zoning code text amendment meets the criteria
provided by FWCC Section 22-528. . .
3. To forward a recommendation to City Council regarding adoption of the proposed zoning
code text amendment.
V. DECISIONAL CRITERIA
FWCC Section 22-528 provides criteria for zoning text amendments. The following section analyzes
the compliance of the proposed zoning text amendments with the criteria provided by FWCC Section
22-528. The City may amend the text of the FWCC only if it finds that:
. .
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the
comprehensive plan.
The proposed FWCC text amendment is consistent with the following Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) goals and policies. The request complies with the following goals:
L UP 16"': Revise existing land use regulations io provide for innovation and flexibility in the
design of new sirigle-family developments and in-fill.
HG 1 - Preserve and protect the quality of existing residential neighborhoods and require new
development to be of a scale and design that is compatible with existing neighborhood
character. .
Flag Lot Development Standards - Code Amendments
Planning Comm~ssjon Staff Report
File #06-I05059-OO-UP / Doc 1038628
Page 4
EXHIBIT I..
P AGE--'-OF-5
- ~~-
2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relatiol.1ship to public health, safety, or
welfare. .
The proposed FWCC text amendment bears substantial relationship to the public health, safety,
and welfare because it provides for setback and minimum lot size requirements that will ensure
adequate and consistently-applied building separation and buildable lot area requirements for flag
lot development within single-family neighborhoods.
3. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the City.
Approval of the proposed code amendment would benefit the City as a whole as it would help
ensure that flag lot development fits in more effectively with traditional single-family lot
configurations where each lot has direct access to the adjacent right-of-way.
VI. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Consistent with the provisions of FWCC Section 22-539, the Planning Commission may take the
following actions,regarding the proposed zoning code text amendments:.
I. Recommend to the City Council adoption of the FWCC text amendments as proposed;
2. Modify the propo~ed FWCC text amendments and recommend. to the City Council adoption of
the FWCC text amendments as modified;
3. Recommend to the City Councilthat the proposed FWCC text amendments not be adopted; or
4. Forward the proposed FWCC text amendments to the City Council without a recommendation.
VII. EXHIBITS
Exhibit A - Proposed Modified FWCC Section 22-1, "Definitions": flag lot, lot area, p~m handle,
property line, and required yards
ExhibitS - Proposed Setback Requirements for Flag Lots
Exhibit C - Proposed Modified Use Zone Chart FWCC Section 22-631
Exhibit D - Proposed Modified Use Zone Chart FWCC Section 22-648
Exhibit E - !>roposed Modified Use Zone Chart FWCC Section 22-666
Exhibit F -:- Proposed Modified Use Zone Chart FWCC Section 22-667
Exhibit G - Proposed Modified FWCC Section 22-955, "Calculating Lot Coverage"
File #06-t05059-OQ-UP I Doc 10 38628 .
Page 5
. Flag Lot Pevelopment Standards - Code Amendments
Planning Commission Staff Report
EXHIBIT A
FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE
Chapter 22
22-1 Definitions
J.'i'/af{. lot or "panhandle lot" means a DIalled lot in the shape of a flag or pan that is connected'
to the road or street right-of-way by a narrow strip of land. The narrow strip of land connecting
the main oortion of the lot to the road or street right-of-way is the "flag oole" or "access
panhandle" part of the lot.
Lot area means the minimum lot area per dwelling unit based on the underlying zone.
For smgle family lots. the area of a vehicular access easement. private tract. "flag pole."
or "access panhandle" shall not be credited in calculation of minimum lot area.
Pan handle lot means flag lot.
Primary vehicular access means the majef street. vehicular access easement. or orivate tract
from which the majority of vehicles enter the subject property.
Property line means those lines enclosing the subject property and those lines defining a
recorded vehicular access eaSement or tract. The following are categories of property lines:
(1) The front property line is any property line that is adjacent to a right of way whieh is
more than 21 feet in widtl'.. excluding Interstate 5. If the subjeet property is adjacent to more than
eRe right ef way \vhich is more than 21 feet in v/idth, the applicam: shall designate whiM of the
adjaeeftt pf0J3erty liRes is the front prepefty liBe and the remainder of ~uch adj&Geflt preperty lines
will be eOflSidered as either a reer property liRe or side property line, based on the definition in
this seetion. If the . sHbjeet property is Rot adjaeeftt to a right of way ';/hieh is more than 21 feet in
v:iEkr., then the :&eat property line is the property liae adjacent or principally oneRted to the street
. . .
providing primary vehiculer &Gcess to the sHbjeet property, as determined by the director ef the
depllrtmefttof eommumty deveiepment. The front proi:>erty line is any prooerty line that is
adjacent to a primary vehicular access. If the' subject. propertY is adjacent to more than one
primarv vehicular access. the applicant shall designate which of the adiacent property lines is the
front propertY lirie and the remainder of such adiacent property lines. will be considered as either a
rear propertY line or side orooerty line. based on the definition in this section. exceot the property
line adjacent to an arterial or primm collector shall not be designated as a primary vehicular
access.
(2) For flag lots. the yard setbacks shall be the same as the underlYing zone setbacks. exceot
. the front yard setback area shall be applied per Exhibit B.
~ ill The rear property line is any property line that is farthest from, and essentially parallel
to, the front property line.
~ ill The side property line is any property line other than a front property line or a rear
property line.
MaclDtooh HD:Usen:janet:DoaImen1a:Miaoocft u....Da..:SOvcd AlIIl:hmealS:DdinibDDl.dac
r----------8~r-----~___,
~ I
III I
"!l 1;0
I Lot 2 III
1- - - I IO!
I .'
F=
20'
I ,
I ,
-------S~~---------
5= 5'
/----------------
I ,
I '
'TO I ':;0
II ,Lot 1 'II
N I '01
~ I I.
L_______________:
Exhibit B
Flag Lot Setbacks
Driveway
for Lot 2/
Access
Easement
for Lot 1
5 = 10'
Or
F = 20'
r - - - -. - - - - _ - .R..= Ji'_ - - - - - - - -. ,.
~ I
III I
en' ,
", Lot 2 ':::
'- - - 1 101
~>, '"
~O~! : - u u u - -;, _. - u_ _ __ u:
r----S=~--------,
I ,
1 I
7: : Lot 1 ::::
N
~ I J~
, ,
,_ - - - - - - - - - - - _. - - _I
5= 10'
r--------~-B=~---------,
, I
II' ,
": Lot 2 ::::
L - ,- 1 III!
~), I
F= l' I . I
20' -J., . - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _i
5= 5'
. - - - - .:. - _Ii =.:.5:' - - - - - - - - _,
, ,
<n", ,Cf.I
~ Lot 1 ~
~I I ..
1_ _ _ -: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __,
Driveway
for Lot 2
Not an arterial.
-------------
or primary collector
Driveway for Lot 2
and Access E.asement
for Lot 1
Arterial or
-primary cOllector
Driveway
for Lot 3
and Access
Easement
for Lot 2
r-~--~-~---.-B=~--.:.----~
~ I
n'l J
en, L t 3 ,:;0
~ 0 ,II
L _ _ _ tV!
~, ,
F= 1'1 . ,
20' "j,.! - - -. - - - - - -5-=5'- - - - - - - -I
,_____S=~_______I
, ,
I ,
:' L ~
N' ot 2 .:;.
C! I I ~
, ,
J I
,_ _ _ _ ._ _ _ =_ ;- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J
R= 5'
-------------------,
I ,
enl L t 1 ,en
III 0 ,II
~ I~
., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --'
F=.20'
Not an. arterial
o-r primary -collEi"ctor-
F = Front Yard
S = Side Yard
R = Rear Yard
u
~
l-4
=
~
~
~
'"
Q
.9
~
]
e
(l)
.s
o
....
....
o
:E
='
'"
(l)
Q
~
rii
~
-a
0+:/
5
-0
0;;;
(l)
i
]
o
~
.5
'"
(l)
.s
.5
-0
!
o~
..18-
'a (l)
:s .0
: :;j
:; -5l
~ ~
't:I gj
1 oS
'5 ~
.s 0
(l) ==
Q .s
.... (l)
~ ~
M
M
-
CIS
..
....
=
~
't)
..
m
~
~
b
's
CIS
f;;I;c
I
~
"6i>
.S
rJ:J.
~
=
Q
..
.~
>
S
i:i
,9
....
o
(l)
'"
'"
:s
,5
-e
r.S
~
'"
'"
u
....
o
Q
-0
la
~
u
~
~
~
Vl
j;;)
rn
6
~
~.
..
.a
::l
~ ~
~J
..
~ ]
~ ><
;~l
:0.0 I ~
-0 .
:J'
..
!-<
g
~
en
i
r-:J
~~
N
~ li d ....
go :; u 0
l:l. ~ ~ g
ts -s ~ :!!l
]. 'li " i>
: 1 i !
~ .~ :~ .~
J ~ ~ ,
~. :~ .! 8
1 '~.. ~ 1
~~! i ~ !i
If . .~ Ii. 8 !i
.. ;:l" e ::I
~ :M* 'a ~
go :fa .9 '0
l- '1 t -I p:1
~ b~ ] ~ ijM
co- il S .. ot
~ 1 ~ i ~ '3 ~ i
J .g t ~ 1:! ~ l'a ti
.8 !~ 1~~ -lEl~
S' ~'O 3 a~'a'a.. e~~
.~ a .8 ~ fli .9 ~ ~] i
dd ~ J~ i~IIJ J~
go g-~ "'! ~:3 tOO ~ J .s ~:s: ~ oil it ~
o 0 cr 11 cr ~ b " .I>:a 60....: j .r.!il
'. g g 888 og -a ;1lO a.s e g .3 fil
~ .,.;:d' '" <"\. 0 :I. eo' 13!il ii B 2''0
~ ~ .~ ~ r; ~ 0 g ] ~ 8 a ~ ~ s
... !l !l'-.- -- lil t ~ ~ a :; go'iil "-S.Do
~ 'j;!.i;j ~ M !l ~ " .. i Cl .I> ,,-iil II s al
..._...Ol'..-i;je .i~ 1l.0>.t=~>..>4
.= .Q.9 0 0 0 S e ~ CtJ .~ u "d >< -5 Do';
~ !:I !:I ~ i i g i .~ -8 .E ~ j ~ ~ ~ ." ! s
.go .m.m ~ m ~ "I" l'! s ~ ;Q 5l ~ If ~ :s .g B
1l'~ .~:~ i~ ~ ~ It.~ .s rg!: 'a 'a ~ ]
~ .a.a .. .. .. ~; [~G . . .s 11 ~ ~ g ~ I'l ~
b " "-S -s -s 0 .. .., > ,0 ~ . .. og i3 0 'Iii g
c.. it :: vi' ur n d' U <d' S ~ ~ ';/. ~ '/!. . ~"a's ~ os: ..!!":i ~
.~ ~ ~ II II co.g ~ ~ <; ~ ~ :i! :i! $ .!l Ii ~ ~ a 'E If'~
.. 0 0 Iii Iii Iii 8" N.... - 0 0 " . U 01 Do oo " .. 0( :;-s:
.2 vi vi ~ <<"'! ~ W M g 9 .n vi "! t"'! C! . ;; ~',:a .g g.~ K
~Ei5~ij 1~~ii5~i ~~l!~til
:~EEEEE~ ~~~EEE~~ O~'iil~~d~~
~ ...0 u -d u ~. ....1.,.;J"'1...o.; -d ,;.,. r--lco1:fl cN-e;:;.jd;..Ii
....; ...... rli.f,.f; -4i.d= li .0 <( cj; ;:j; ..j.
Vl
~
~
o
z
~
~
sa
~
!-:l
;:,
C
~
3
u
r.il
l:l.c
Vl
s:J:nlds lIuPPBd co
.pgJ!noo~ . 8. i.5
....og3
MIlOIU1S
JO 1t(.l!:lH
gll8JgAO~ 10']
(qoll:l) :lP!S
:1Z!S '01
SS:lOO.ld ,o\\:l!A:l~
pgJ!nb3~ "
~
SNOI.L YIO.mmft
~ g> l:l
~li]l
OIl>
S~
en s::I '01
l1l31I
d ctl
~. (:) IlI\
8~ ~
~ d .
00".
.,.;~.1A~ .....
idtctl
~~~~
. 1UOl:!
.s I -
-!i g IlO ~
1J 11 ,9
< ~ Iii J!
~
;;JQ
],i
~l'~
lz,
l:lu~
~Hil.";
....; 8.... ~
ri .... l>.
:i!l i~.t ~ i~!
~~i;]"ilgUJi'a
"#.
C>
'"
ctl
.....
ctl
.....
d
.....
C;Cl!;l 1) g . 'a
Clo.gS - - 11" Cl
~]'.. 9..1 -fi:a .~
~ 'E j g .~ .E :s :ti ~ J! 11 .~
o Do] ~.~ ~ -[~ g lJ J! ~ '5.fj
1 ...1. "I~
~o i g.
g .. ~ 15:~ it
z <]"5l:a~~
11 1.i
0....
Cl .
:l~
"'.......
i.i t ~ ~
8J.8S,-,
i
..
~ If.,'
::l
N tl
:. ~
"
1;( ~ [
g i~
.. ...-
] .a.....
ta ~~
Do -i-
] '11 ~
.i i ~fi ...._
1 1>- ~
1 ~l ;
.~ It ~..
i 'Oe ~
~ ~~ ~
o ~"O t-..'"
a aa q.
~lz,lz, ~
0:
'1
....
'"
~
~
..-;
~
Iii'
t.
....
"'"
o
....
~
~
.!l ~
:8 >. 0
] 1 ~
~ ~ '" ~ S
~~F!:::~ d
"''';'''f1' ;;t
]~:::l:::l:::l _
s..!...!.J...!. ~
::l'~:S:~l.j! ~
1~~~:::l ~
J: ~
<.l
8
~
!l
J
I
1
!
Is
:3
1
~
11
i
II
J
~
1
l
~
~
l-oI
~
~
~
3
.....
=
~
.<1>
CI)
....
.?;
]
I
CI)
~
.s
<I>
CI)
-B
.s
"0
CI)
:t::.
.@
:i 8
.; CI)
::s J:J
~::a
== -;:J
~ .<1>
~ CI)
"0 ~
~ .s
~ ~
u _
< ;S
00 CI)
~ t:l
'9
M
M
i:l
.g
y
CI)
r/J
:!l
:s
.s
't!
~
~
.'"
'"
CI)
.....
o
s::
"0
~
'"
=
o
..0
~
]
CI)
....
CI)
-B
o
.....
.....
y
.2
J:J
=:l
<I>
CI)
s
i
~
U
~
o
N
~
VJ
~rI)
6
~
...J
;:J
~
[b]
...
eEl
'"
'"
o
~
m
~ ~
j .~
gj~
]
9 {j
~ ~
"d:g"d
'i !:d~
e .~I~
~~~
~
.n
6
b
u
~
SNOllYIIl9nIj}
VJ
~
.r-c
o
z
~
~.
~. .. "
d .. II .. .H ~
- cD ... .o2'~.g 0
Ocr .2 :.a a Q, ~ d
~ g 9 s] 1 'c; ~ ] i 0 t;I .~
0.0. a ~ ..... 3'.... ~ ]
" ~ .~ ~ cD ~.g .' a E ~
~.. a ~.~ ..'~ = ,!l ~ ......'" ~. .;
~ i .s .a ~ ~ [l ~ U _. >- -~
,- a ] ~.g .~:a ~ gj .s -I ~
~~ ~ ii~1t i; ; ~ ~
-g 11 Cl ~ S fg, ~ ~ ;; ~ ~
11 ~ 'i~~i['; J ,1] .~ 1
.e ~ ~ .:15 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ .g ~ .g
l.l"" g, :s:a.. ..~!i " .. '0 0 ....
'j3 ,1:1 9 ] fit ~.~ .~ ~.~ 11 ~ ~
-~ - ~a... ~ ~ ~ Cl ~
..215 'g .g'il"'!go.'.. '::I 0.;.
g- 002'5.8 .. u ~ a '"
j j~ .:i ~ ~ 1! u. ~ ~ .1 i J .~ .g
.' 1: ~ -a '~.g a:~ go.. .e 'c;
. .., 5 0 e <:3 ~'l .. .~ :; ;:J ..,.
. . ~ o.~ :3 ...q i ~ i,3 ';:j Q ~
N;;; B fit'il ._Cl <( _ .g .M = 1l::i
:; 'f 'C .. -lil rl ~ 1 " ... . ... :; 8 0
s ~ ~ ~.;:j B ~ 0 ~ g ~ ~ .;:j II <(
......g ,,= o.~.t' '" "'= lil
ls 1 ~ ~ 9'~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ U.~ g >-
1li! ] .!'il~~.g ~ ti;;; ~ ~i!~ .';'il B
002 5 ~ z.~ ft:::> S ~ '3 ~ 8 .B e ~ g -il g
g II <( ';.01 ...fj..o!: It", g o.Jl...-g.,; >-
:s u ~ .G' u 8 -. t' 60lI .... U -.:;J UI ._ "I) as
~ l3 IS . ~ _8 ~ 'c; 'E oJ: ~ II ~ -s 'c;.~ B 4I ~
.g.~ ~. .. g, 5'-p g'; 'g, ~ co 9 a Q, ~ g- '~
.g... 11. l.fj :..lV ~ i! ~ ~ ~.fj ~ 0 S'
tl ~ It -3'" ~ ~ {i ;ro2 ~ E.g II :Jo al _0.
il.. ~ ~.. .. .. 5 .g b "
a~ g~ ~.g;:J~~~Jo2.M:: ..!hl.fj~ ~
] ~ :go ,g C 9 ~ 1l.~ :ii \, .S' ~.g -s '3.~ 5 ti g
UJ 8 en 0 ~ "._..., c.f 0. tI$ ~ ~ ""=' ~ t> -=
S'1l il. ~ ' ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 J ij ]> e ~.~ .g ~ a ~
~ 1lO ... . 0 o"if.g g j 8 .. -S ,!l ~ j.o ~ ,9
~:~ ~ ~ . " i-~'~ ~ ~ ~.~ .~ 01 ~ ~ ~-~] :;
= ~ u '" ~ 00... -5 ;>" > ~ "0 i:I E .. I) 8 0 0
co.. .8 - 0 ... -fi ~ .. ~ C! " >< 1lO 8 <( :;j ~ ~ u _ ! :ii
].g DsE~~""~~"'~~~~*~J ~~""ollls.g
1 .s a -g on ';' :6 :6 :6 ~ 1! -5 ] 'ia IS! l.e l;! ~.9 ~ II 5' ~ ;:J -s ~
"''' ;:J.o i 0 ft AD, 'ia'" 'J; -51 iil .<( 0. ::::: '3 '" >- 0. :; 0 .. a
~.~ ~ Q .~ ~ on '<! ::! cd -5111 J!.~ 'c; g ~ II ~Q ~ 8 [ 11 <( sa ZO
i-Ii "'" - '" on < ;:J.... .. = ~rJ II -0 '::1 ",,;:J. l:"
..2 ~ li.", <Il <Il '" "1'; 0 u..o .~ ... M II 01 0 811 <( 0..J
8.9 0 "..: l>: l>:": l>: . <( u ,s::l'] ~ '" . '" (; <( fl.... ~,..,1 Cl ~
~ = e >- e.!l .!l .!l .!l .!l'; Cl ~ .0 == ."'. .,.J -d ;:J N Cl od :<' oJ 'il;=;f ~ J;
..2'~ ~ ~ ~ "LD U.,; u.. ~'fi] ~ ~ ~ .1= oJ; ~ -A> ; J: ~ c1ii! J; 11 ~
.....;.~6N8 M...t1."'l:::tiO.
VJ
Z
o
....c
~
...:l
8
~
...:l
:S
u
~
~
VJ
...,
s~lldS lJU!,/.llld ~
c
. i>~nb:l~ 8
rI)
c:::
~n ~o
:lJI1l:ln.QS .. OJ:a 'iii
)0 ltf.!!:lH It! ~ ~ '3 t
g~~:ou
:I'iJIu:lAO;) 10'1
SS:I:lOJd A\:I!A:l~
p:lJ!nb:l~
(q:lll:l) :lp!S
..~
U 0
<nC:::N
J1l:l~
.. It! It!
~o
c:::~ on
2
olt!ud!!
.,.; o.~ ~
~~ i It!
.sl~ 0 ~
J1~~
looJ.:I
:1l!S }0'1
U~
U 0
rl)C:::
'"
8
e
(1.,....
'"
~ co.5 8
'" 5 C'. c:::
11)- ;.JU]>>u
Ioil 8 ~ 01\1)':'2
en u' -<.S :l
;:;l~ <~ ~......."'......
~
'il
'" B'
....
~ ..
'il
'" '"
M ....
- ~
:l ~t
..
l --
B':
..",
... .r-
" '8~
~ :...'"
0. i-:
...
~ Oil ~
.<:l .
... ~~
~
11>-
0. ..11
.,; ~'3
~ Q ~lf
~ -liI .. ..
",. g e...
0. . l;j~
ii '{i
Cl Il 1li
.. ] ....~
0 0...
... ]]
.. II
" ~ -3.g
.iJ
" .. .. ...
! 0 o 0
IJo IJoIJo
I
I- .S >.
] l
'K "l
... e
;.Qo-"o"
Vlr---_\Q
~'?'?'f'f
-o~~~~
~ I I I I
e;::~~;;;
~~~~~
......N~MN'
ft=
,t
g
i
!l
. '3
.",
I
11
~
'"
!
Q
~
::>
i
G
~
B
Ii
I
I;l
11
.!
i
::>
~
1
t
.S ..1; ~
! l~ ?<' oS "3 .
... . .. O.s:! .
\ ",olaSoo~"O
__~ ta%''d
S ~ ~..~ -& U \
8~~~ta
~o~Qg..s~
to.. oSg oS
~oS~oSo~" -,
-a a ~.; ~ a oS
~.g%,g~g~
Q. c:l ~.~ 0 'll co
-%.0 .s '~"O ~ ~ ~
~ :s ~ tt:le -e'~ 8
... ~ ... ..
?;-~.2.ooa",'"
b ~ ! ~o ~ (
~"'" . ~ ~
z % 0 ola oS l:l'~ 8 !!9
~ Ii '6. t:je ta.- 1. ~
8,2Soo......i --:.
.~ ....olX.a-Bo 0 -.s
~..". og-Q8tt'l ...
\iJ~ '5 "a li.8 ~.~ .. .~ ~ co i
~ -u-- g - ~ ~ ~
. .S ~ -01 i"8 s -Q .. ~ "'
~ """ .g] ~]"O B~~! ~ - -.0 ~
o ~ '3 ~
.."'.s"'s' S S '" .... "'
N~ $ ~lg~l~~~U~ \ ~
.... ~
""..n/J,% u ..~~ "'" <:>
. C ., ....
~5'~~c;'~ ~ i .~.~ ''{
lA .....
~ ....
% lJD ~-a .9 8"0 a:i .... ~ ""'",
0
~ ;8 Q.~::> i 00 "0 ~... 00 lOll \a ~....
.9 .. ...
1~!~'d~-e~~~ i J 1~
u '" -s .. ~,s n ~ oS ';>:> ~ \a .~
~ _~ -;>--s S -d t:j 'Po ~ .s '" i,""
~ ~ 5~"O~~t:ji~~~ 1 .~ i
$I ~ .
e Po %. c:: -;>-,2'~ .. g ~ 0 ~ bIl .:gt
::>oo~tl -SO 00 \
~~'S -%"-s~~~. '2 11>-
'" '& ~ 00 -s.- a 51 ~ ij
~ i~g-oli~~..a \
u "",,""'ou
.z .. ..,.... ,,~'~ t1 . S ~ lii'...
0 ola-<gOil.s . ..~' '()
c::0~""8~...0~<::l O. '3 a..
~ o 0.-..- 0 . to'::I """ of.) ~s -::I l~
~ -a ... ~ " e e ~ g t1> ~ :>- ~
u '~ ... '0.... .- .. ..- '" e ~~
...... . 0> e 0 _ -" rJ'l ~ Po i "Oe
';) P;g.~ ...olatt:l-d...~ ...
en ~ o.~..,~~ i< ]]
"5 . ,s.st~~i~~~ ~ ~
... 0 ~~
~ ~:!it;\0Q.N,,8*~~i \; '0'0
g it'-se-S",-se j 1"''''
~ ~ds 'iluW'ld
... . p~J!nb:l)l
ola
~
~:\ ~.nu:lnnS
}O 11\'il!~l\
~ ~'alJJ~MO 10'1
l
$I l Jll~ll
c:l
~ >'
~~~ . N:lll~) ~p!S
" ,g
... ;s .!! ~
~" I! 1UO)..! \ '~
~ t
iJJ ~S 10'1
"5 ~~o":d
V\-t-p-t~
~ ?,,~~
ssg:lOJd /l\~y.~1l 1<"'~""~
p:lJ!nb31l \ \ \ \
P a;;~~~
I:i~""~'"f
SN.ou.~'l'l'\l ...:~~~~
toJ.. r:
en
p~
~
~
0-
,.;
""
.;
!::f
~
o
:z;
..;
o
;.;
q
-.0
--:
....
,.;
""
;.; "
<to \
'1
....
<:>
~ 3
..; .~
0 \
~
....
..\-
,.;
..,. '1
..: l
~ .~
~ ~
~ 1
?
~ ,
.n 'i
";' i
....
'1
....
....
~
...., \
.'"
..,. 0:':'
.n i
1t
'1 :?
on ~
0-
0 1
:z; "
~ -i
;;;./ '.t
~
~
::l
=
.~
=
Q
~
~
=
::l
~
...
-
-;
~
"0
t'
~
~
u
~
~
.~
~
~
~
~
g
. .:;:1
u
G)
(/)
.~
.~
~
s
'Q;
(/)
(/)
g
~
-0
g
'a
.g
1
<U
....
~
f;...,#I
~
.~
~
~
"Cl
....
'"
~
~
a
~
%
~
~
{I)
~
~
Z
Q~
.~\
~
~
~
u
~
~
\
u
~
Zo In
~
~o
~~
~s
~
~
Q
e
....
'"
....
.~
~
.s
s
t)
.~
~
II>
G)
~
~
:::;;.
~
~
.g
....
(/)
e
~
'!
~
e
.s
.~
-0
G)
~
~.
~ ~
~ ~
~]
= f/)
<U . ~
~ ~.
"a ~
-5 .~
<II .s
~ .....
c:. S
-.Q ~
~ \-'
~
...
.e
'"
\
.~.~
:.~
'!l
1
9 ..,
~ .~~
~ ,~~
e.~1
t-'~
.cg
\1-<
iIi
\
*-
:s -dOl ,,\~.g i-i
\~~h\~~\ t ~
~H!I1"".lI ~"
o. ... ~
loa ~~o~o
-.;l. .~ 'II> ..........., S
... 110 ~ .':1. 'i \ ~ r. '1 <f <f ...
.; s~~:a n ~...~~~ ..,.;
~ e" .. ~ .-5 .. I I ' , ~
';to",~o"'<iO~ a~"''''''' ""
'i ..:""ci~~~~"';
.....%. ~:~ \~~.~~ 1
~V;\e\lll - ~
o~~t) r~
OA~~ v.~ -d
~
. 'il "a
~..~4! fl:S. ~
1 g.~. ';' 1 ~
'i"v 0", ~
~ i~ 'lj'~
"a 1 i'~ "a
.~ ~ l~ \
~ 9 "ii'~ -t..
...J:; \1~p..
o ~ -5,e '::11' ,.
i ~- 'i :a .; all
l~" ...t ~3\\-5'
~ \. 'i~ ~l%.'~ ~
i "ii 1'~ ~ ~ ~ "a ;;;;
<> .~. " ,%Ol ~ ~'"
f.. -:> ~ \\. ~ ~ .~\ .~
u."a ~a ~..e ...
,~~'a ..go 4. ~""
-a-%'~ ~l 3"a..'e~
Ol .P '> .\ 4! 'i ~ ~ 4. .,A
~1 ~ 11 !l.o\~\
..g.,A a, 5'" l!,....
I\~ ~- ;':a a ~ i'%' ';.,
'i \ ~ -0 ~ ~ ~..1. ~.~
>>'~"'i%""\ · \ ~ ~Ol \. 9 ~
.. \l->:\ "al"ii.?;'~
.,._=' .. 4. ~...
..-0 ..% ~...'~ 9
o ~ -0 e o. -.a 11
,~"a ". ~ '3 ~ ~ "a -5 '"il
1 ~ ~.~. ~ ~; 'g .~ t \ ~
"'..u J~ "'e e-5
~ -5 .., ~ 'g ~",~'a ~
o .e ~ ~.... i ~:a'e '6,0
~ " .... J. -5 S!. ~ ~ 4. ... ,~
-5 ~... _9 ~ -e u 9 ~ e-
.. ~ <D> 'f "'::. 4. ;;::\ \l '0; '"
'g"S 3Bo s"a"il'l>O
a ~\l . v 0'6 -f/) '3P''''''''
*' go~_ I'; .ri~l.J ~~~~
~p....", ...\\ o%.,\:"ii"t..trl: .
s%llldS -aupVlld. .. .~_ \l i .~
"'~ \....
'\l~l~t\b:I''tl ~ ~ -'a gO.... 0.. ~ n
...",,:0 p
..
~ ......
:)1~tU\S ~.;,~'~
JO lq'iJ~~H ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~41
. ..'"
co8 ~5Q
~ ~ ~~'i ~~9i
....oU~~...~~
~~~.&'"il~~..."a
~~~j\.lY,) \O'l
~j\ ,\~ ~
~
"..
1ll~1l. ~
"..
~
on
(\\~~) ~'\l~S
1j\~...
".. .
...~
1" ~
.. -a'll''''
: \1-; ~ .e
e ",,2 i t!
o~~-5~
lu01:l ~ ~
4i.
~s \O'l i
o
8.
"..
ss%l<>1c1 Jto.~V'-~ll
'\l;)l1t\b~ll %
';to
s~ou. ~~'1lJ:{\
1
l.~
~~
p""
VA
?c:::>
~..
~
'il
-0
...
....
~ ~
... ..,
.0> ~
...
~ ~'i
t
t
'"
1
...
,~
'a
'"
'iO
o
"A
~
'i
~
~
~
.0
'g
""
i
""...
!~
"s'"
.~...
,.!.
. ....
~.o>
-n ~
A ..
'~i
"3....
s~
~''S
ro~
a...
~1
~..
.....
0'"
"'~
1'~
~4!
'<='
q
...
...
c..
...;
""
.;
q
....
o
.;
';Zo
..;
o
.;.:
'!.
.'
..
..;
.0>
~
~
i:.
.;
';to
i
....
00
",\<0
;.;
";'
o
~
..
Iii
~
~
r-
""
o
, ~
~
u
o
p.
~
~
g
."
~
,
\
..g
.~
il
..
p
i1
';)
,
~
,
1
'is
Ii
i
:?
~
'1
.\
. . ..../.............................
d.
o
..g
Q)
'"
.~
..a
a
~
.....
~
~
a
~
~
~
z
~~
~\
~
~
~
u
{;fl,
~
...
.g
'"
'"
~:1
~ ,'ite1,,\<y')lO'l
1
9 .;g
~ ~
~ ~ (\\:l1l:J) 'P\S
i~:~
. ;}.
~
in
'6
~
p
s~ou.'\"11l~tl
~.
'"
'"
g
~
oQ
g
~
.9-
~
1
Q)
~
.a
9
-u
.~
~
'"
~
~
~
~,
~
.g
.....
'"
eo
1
~l
~ ~
~ .a
~ .a
! -0
..., ~
-0 .~'
1A e
u ~
~ Q)
~ .0
11
u '"
~ ~
-d .~
.e ~
l!i S!.
~ ....
-< .s
~~
~
\
li'l
Z
Scn
li'l'6
(/)~
? 5
~
'" 1A' J ~ g
~!'d~ S? .... '"
1 :'0.__ .' ~ ~ t ~
""5 ~ :;:~ .. '" i'~
...; . ~ ~ e'~ ~ i 5!. '0 - ':='=
.-a'a~'it:aa ~ '" ~.'3.!
aaa5..~a- ~ ~ 'i4:l"
;t;~:!!"" · · >".~
~:a~ ~ g...... ~ - ~ ~
1111\1~~i'., ~ ~ ~s
~ ~ 'G .~ 1 'a'g. j ~. ~ '.Q ~ '<l
""g."" .~ tf!-o..::' S 'S -0 \:l
.U\"..~. · ~ "..
~uUht.l ."\ 1- !'H ".
" "" . .. . \\.1 - .' · " ·
:':':'~-i~'l.':' Ii 1\ .~. ;I-
i'i'i"~.s\1l' g lll%. .. ~~
.!!;~~ ~\~ \ i ; ~ \ i, ~'l
~'l\.1\l~1l ~,!l ~ "-:;i \t.l
~~~l~!\""t. . :. i'. ~1l~~"
....\\.".~'~. ;1 ' ~ .~-ll ~'~1\
~lU" %. \'l \, " "" ,,\ :..i ~ III ':,-
'il.n~""" \" H~~'''~' .'.".
....... '., 'l\ ~_~~.... W"'~
....$,..~. ,~,.,.$.'U". -:.'~
"........" '." ,'P,.,,~ ......
Hl;:~i\ ':.'u ~ I' I ~ \ \'~.'; 1\ ~ H :;..-:.
\\.~;.~':D .-::i " ,:. hll il .1\1\' \-a.~ ~
. 'l." 'l.-r"'"., ' " ~ u..ll ",..H ,,\...
. 111. t h',. " P 1\ ~ 1\ '" ,~. .,. ~.. ~
~:~U~. %,'.11;', , ; ~ l......t ~lH:D E! P ;;
o.;.;.;e~1$",e~~ ~\~ ..-a-%:~~l ~ <;a...1)t. \\",-a
\ -' -' .~:i!tu"" lii.~'.'H ~ ~.; ~ll'~ ~.
~HH~:n ,}.. ~,"H"~(:1H.l
. '~" ~ ~,~ <l-;; ~,. i ~,n\~ 11:0.\. .. ... ·
.~~~ lV,..-l '1 ,. ...... .~_'s h '. " ·
'.~-a-a-at i'i~'!:~ ~ l iJ 'i ~~~~~ e~~~ .;~ :i.~~
. ~ ~ ~ . . ~_ . , ... ' ' '... ~ ' ,.-1,,,-,.. '" '"
t' -',; -' t' ,.<1 l' " . ,~. - · " ,. - J; \ J; ~ · ·
..; .... S 'if ~ on ~ ,l; .'3 ... 4:1
s~'IldS 'ilU\~<l
p:ll~nb,)l
:-''''
a"",
lilA,S""
'il - ~ .
~ l'~ fi
~:s ~ ~.~
~! ~
~ ",,%"3; s
~ ~~..\ ,%:a ~ . ~
~~i>-';~.t~ {j,
oD '"
:Ss~ '"
1."~'i1l~
...Ijj~~
'" ~ ...~.
.n.~ ~~..;~..~,g
':>t;' .l ~ ~,.;'~ ':>t n ; ~~ ~
Iii!. <d .. 0 ~ ~ ~ Ii!. 0 ~.; ..
.eli,~~i>-';.e'~"P-';
i~ui\~\ lli~~
,~nns
JO l1f<i\:Jl\
11I:l)l ~
'"
1~''''
\U01:l
~
~
... -
g .. ~ ~ .% B
g1~~"a~'it ~
~~!~~-aa 1
~
i
~IOI
~ .\
l\ll
li~ ~.t
\YZ\S llYl
ss~l<l /Il'o:l\,\:l)l
p~t\b,)l
~
p~
f:>
q
...
-
a..
",.
-
~
g
~
..;
o
1:
"
'" d'
~ ~
.... "
r.
... '"
"" ~
<:>
~ 't~
~g
~ -..,
~...
iii ..'"
oD .~::.
j ~~
iii
"" \-
1 '1: l
... 1i
.~
liI "3:>-
Po i\
~
~ ~e
g a~
.~ <;a'
\ "j~
c.oe
~i
J., .~.
0 .s.3
'0 0'0
\<0 \<0'"
~
q
'1
'"
-
.,;
C;;
-
<:>
~
i
(i.
""
~
-
'"
"'"
~
~
0-
a-
~
..;
o
i-2
""
-
..}
'"
-
,
\
..:
~
~
~
i
if\
'b
~
. "
lil
~
~
~
II
'1
\
"$
1
!
:
.:;>
\
~
\
\
'Ii
!
i
';:)
@
l
'l
i
...
"'"
,,;
~
~
~
to- .i
~ .u ~
l! l~
i .... ~
~.. ... ~
,*~i~ ~
~~~" 't ~
"A~~""~ -
.. I \ ,
a:;;"''''- 4
d"l~~~ ~
...r~~~~ 0
r=- . ~
~ 2..
EXHffiIT G
FEDERAL WAYCITYCODE
Chapter 22
22.955 Calculating lot coverage.
(a) General. Except as specified in subsection (b) of this section, the area of all structures,
pavement and any other impervioUs surface on the subject property will be calculated as a
percentage of total lot. area, exclusive of the area of any recorded access easements, in
determining compliance with maximum lot coverage required in this chapter. If the subject
property contains more than one use, the maximum lot coverage requirements for. the
predominant use will apply to the entire development
(b) Exceptions. The following shall be excepted from the provisions of this section:
(1) A wood deck will not be considered as an impervious sUrface for maximum lot coverage
proposed if the deck is constructed with gaps between the boards and if there is a pervious surface
. .
below the deck.
(2) A vehicular access easemeri~ 6f private tract. or that portion of a private driveway located
within the "flag pole" or "access panhandle" part of the that serves more than one lot will not be
used or considered in determining compliance with the maximum lot coverage requirement of
this chapter.
(3) One-half of the area covered with grass grid pavers will be considered as impervious
surface in determining compliance with the maximum lot coyerage requirement of this chapter.
(Ord. No. 90-43, ~ 2(115.90), :2-27-90; Ord. No. 98-309, ~ 3, 1-6-98)
Macintosh HD:Users;ianetDocuments:Microsoft User Data:Saved Attacbments:Section 22-955.doc
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PLANNING COMMISSION
~ 2._ u_'.
PAGEiOF: ~
~
---
November 8, 2006
7:00 p.m.
City Hall
Council Chambers
MEETING MINUTES
Commissioners present: Hope Elder, Dave Osaki, Dini Duclos, Merle Pfeifer, Bill Drake, and Lawson Bronson.
Conimissioners absent: Wayne Carlson (excused). Alternate Commissioners present: Richard Agnew, Kevin King,
and Caleb Allen. Alternate Commissioners absent: none. Staff present: Community Development Services Director
Kathy McClung, Planning Consultant Janet Shull; Assistant City Attorney Amy Jo Pearsall, and Administrative
Assistant E. Tina Piety. .
Chairperson Elder called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ApPRO" AL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Duclos moved and it was seconded to adopt the October 18, 2006, minutes. The motion was carried.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
None.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Moved to the end of the meeting.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
ELECTIONS
Hope Elder was nominated. for the position of Chciir.There were no other nominations. Ms. Elder was unanimously
selected. Dini Duclos was nominated for the position of Vice-Chair. There were no other nominations. Ms: Duclos
was unanimously selected.
PUBLIC HEARING - Flag Lots Code Amendment
Chair Elder opened the public hearing. Ms. Shull delivered the staff report. The proposed amendments will add
definitions and clarify how existing setbacks are to be applied to flag lot development. Ms. Shull explained a
graphic (Exhibit B of the staff r~port) that shows how the proposed amendments will work. She stated that access
to residential lots is prohibited from an arterial or primary collector for safety reasons. The front yard of a
residential lot is adjacent to where vehicles access the lot.
Commissioner Drake.asked if the size of the setbacks next to an arterial due to sight distance. Ms; Shull replied that
is one of the reasons. Another is to allow parking in front of the house and/or garage. Commissioner Drake. asked
what would happen if there were two flag lots side-by-side. Ms. Shun replied that situation would require a
different arrangement than the proposed for access. She commented that no more than two lots may have access off
a panharidle. Staff is currently working with Public Works staff on access for this type of situatic:>n. It is a different
category of development.
Public Testimony
K:\Planning Commission\20061Meeling Summaty 11-08-06.doc .
Planning Conmiission Minutes Page 2 October 18,2006
. .... . . PAGE 2 ai-t... -..--:
Rodney Grant, 2202 South 300'h Street - He is a property owner who ran in~slOn \'1' City sratrhr.
regards to the setbacks for his flag lot. He feels these amendments will clarify the issue and help
owners to obtain the best use from their property. It will make things easier.
Dini Duclos moved adoption of the staffs recommendation and the motion was seconded. There was no
discussion. The motion passed. Chair Elder closed the public hearing.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
None
ADMINISTRATIVE REpORT
Ms. McClung informed the Commission that the city has purchased the old SeaTac North Theater (Cratsenberg)
property. The city will be seeking a developer to design a project that will follow the Federal Way Comprehensive
Plan and will bring to lightthe potential of Federal Way's downtown. The Public Safety initiative passed, which
means the Community Development Services Department will be hiring a new Code Compliance Officer who will .
focus on quality of life issues, such as graffiti. The Building Official has accepted a position with the City of
Spokane Valley and will be leaving in late December.
The city recently held a stakeholders meeting and about 30 people attended. Most of the time is spent listening to
their permit process experience. From this, staff has prepared a list of concerns that the staff is working to improve.
The city is preparing to aimex all of the remaining Potential Annexation Area(P AA) and is close to reaching an
agreement with King County. King County is encouraging all cities in the county to annex their areas and is willing .
to help fund the process. The city and King County are meeting with homeowner associations in the P AA for their
input and to answer questions on this'issue. It is likely that an election on annexation will occur in November 2007,
with the areas becoming a part of the city in January 2009.
The city is in the midst of its budget process and the City Council is very interested in staffing levels. They are
concerned about whether departments have enough staff to complete their workloads. Departments were asked to
make 2% cuts, so CommlJnity Devefop~ent Services is not asking for new staff.
Ms. McClung asked the Commission to be thinking about what code amendments, if any, they would like to.see on
next year's work program. The "Honey I Shrunk the Lots" is a good presentation and visual picture of how good
different densities can look with good design. Once the presentation is rescheduled with the LUTC, the
Commission will be invited.
At the next LUTC on November 20th, there will be a presentation on the proposed Community Business/Business
- Park (BC/BP) code amendments. Staffwill be seeking the LUTC's direction on the proposed amendments. .
Chair Elder requested that the Corrtrnission be kept informed of development in the city. Ms. McClung replied that
she will give the Commission a copy of the monthly list she prepares for the Chamber of Commerce.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
None
ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at7:45 p.m.
K:\Planning Convnission\2006\Mee1ing Sunvnary 1I-08-06.doc
EXHIBIT !__
__.. 7......
CITY OF FEDERAL WAfAGE.i.OF~
ORDINANCE NO. 06-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF.FED.ERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 22 ("ZONING") OF THE FEDERAL
WAY CITY CODE (FWCC) RELATING TO DEFINITIONS FOR "FLAG LOT,"
"LOT AREA," "PANHANDLE LOT," "PRIMARY VEHICULAR ACCESS," AND
"PROPERTY LINE"; AMENDING SECTIONS 22-631, 22-648, 22-666, AND 22-667
TO CLARIFY SIDE YARD SETBACKS FOR CORNER LOTS AND EXCEPTIONS
TO LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION; AND AMENDING SECTION 22-955 TO
CLARIFY LOT COVERAGE CALCULATIONS FOR FLAG LOTS (AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO'S 90-43,90-51,91-87,91-92,91-100,91-105,91-113, 93-170, 94,-
223,95-245,96-269,96-270,97-291,97-295,97-296, 97-300, 97-307, 98-309, 99-333,
99-337,99-348,99-353,99-357,00-363,01-381, 01-385, 02-424, 03-443,04-457,04-468, .
05-506,06-515)
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that the code amendments to FWCC Chapter 22 ("Zoning")
relating to definitions of flag lot, lot area, panhandle lot, primary vehicular access, and property line;. adding
illustrations for setback requirements for flag lots; modifying Use Zone Charts Section 22-631, "Detached
Dwelling Units in: RS Zone," Section 22-648, "Accessory Dwelling Units in RS Zone," Section 22-666,
"Detached Dwelling Units in RM Zone," and Section 22-667, "Attached, Detached, and Stacked Dwelling.
Units in RM Zone," to clarify side-yard setbacks for comer lots and adding a note regarding calculation oflot
coverage for flag lots; and adding a clarification to Section 22-955 regarding lot coverage calculations for flag
lots are consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way SEP A Responsible Official issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance on the code amendments to FWCC Chapter 22. ("Zoning") relating to definitions of flag lot,
lot area, panhandle lot, primary vehicular access, and property- line; adding. illustrations for setback
requirements for flag lots; modifying Use Zone Charts Section 22-631, "Detached Dwelling Units in RS
Zone," Section 22-648, "Accessory Dwelling Units in RS Zone," Section 22-666, "Detached Dwelling Units
in RM Zone," and Section 22-667, "Attached, Detached, and Stacked Dwelling Units in RM Zone," to clarify
Ord. No. 06-
,Page I
, '/)R4Fr
EXHIBIT ~.. _..._
PAGE z.. OF: 5
side-yard setbacks for corner lots and adding a note regarding calculation of lot coverage for flag lots; and
-:
adding a clarification to Section 22-955 regarding lot coverage calculations for flag lots on October 7,2006;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the code amendments
to FWCC Chapter 22 ("Zoning") relating to. definitions of flag lot, lot area, panhandle lot, primary vehicular
access, and property line; adding illustrations for setback requirements for flag lots; modifying Use Zone
Charts Section .22-631, "Detached Dwelling Units in RS Zone," Section 22-648, "Accessory Dwelling Units in
RS Zone," Section 22-666; "Detached Dwelling Units in RM Zone," and Section 22-667, "Attached,
Detached, and Stacked Dwelling Units in RM Zone," to clarify side-yard setbacks for corner lots and adding a
note regarding calculation oflot coverage for flag lots; and adding a clarification to Section 22-955 regarding
lot coverage calculations for flag lots on November 8, 2006, and forwarded a recommendation of approval to
the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Land Use/Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered the
code amendments to FWCC Chapter.22 ("Zoning") relating to definitions of flag lot, lot area, panhandle lot,
primary vehicular access, and property line; adding illustrations for setback requirements for flag lots;
modifying Use Zone Charts Section 22-631, "Detached Dwelling Units in RS Zone," Section 22-648,
"Accessory Dwelling Units in RS Zone," Section 22-666, "petached Dwelling Units in RM Zone," and
Section 22-667, "Attached, Detached, and Stacked Dwelling Units in RM Zone," to clarify side-yard setbacks
for corner lots and adding a note regarding calculation oflot coverage for flag lots; and adding a clarification to
Section 22-955 regarding lot coverage calculations for flag lots on December 4, 2006, following which it
recommended adoption of the text amendments; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council considered the code amendments to FWCC Chapter 22
("Zoning") relating to definitions of flag lot, lot area, panhandle lot, primary vehicular access, and property
line; adding illustrations for setback requirements for flag lots; modifying Use Zone Charts Section 22-631,
"Detached Dwelling Units in RS Zone," Section 22-648, "Accessory Dwelling Units in RS Zone," Section 22-
Ord. No. 06-
, Page 2
1J
~4p,.
EXHIBITS
. . . PA~i= a Of~~ [ <-
666, "Detached Dwelling Units in RM Zone," and Section 22-667, "Atta~t"~, an ac.
Dwelling Units in RM Zone," to clarify side-yard setbacks for comer lots and adding a note regarding
calculation of lot coverage for flag lots; and adding a clarification to Section 22-955 regarding lot coverage
calculations for flag lots on December 19,2006; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council finds that the code amendments relating to definitions offlag
lot, lot area, panhandle lot, primary vehicular access, and property line; adding illustrations for setback
requirements for flag lots; modifying Use Zone Charts Section 22-631, "Detached Dwelling Units in RS
Zone," Section 22-648, "Accessory Dwelling Units in RS Zone," Section 22-666, "Detached Dwelling Units in
RM Zone," and Section 22-667, "Attached, Detached, and Stacked Dwelling Units in RM Zone," to clarify
side-yard setbacks for comer lots and adding a note regarding calculation of lot coverage for flag lots; and
adding a clarifica~ion to Section 22-955 regarding lot coverage calculations for flag lots are consistent with the
intent arid purposes of FWCC Chapter 22 ("Zoning"), to provide for and promote the health, safety, and
welfare of the general public.
Now, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, W ASHINGTON,DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
. I
I
I
Section 1. Findings. After full and careful consideration, the City Council of the City of Federal Way
finds that the proposed code amendments will protect and will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or
welfare.
Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-216 and 22-528, and based upon the Findings
set forth in Section 1 ~ the Federal Way City Council makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to
the decisional criteria for adoption of the proposal:
1. The proposed FWCC text amendments relating to definitions offlag lot, lot area, panhandle
lot, primary vehicular access, and property line; adding illustrations for setback requirements
for flag lots; modifying Use Zone Charts Section 22-631, "Detached Dwelling Units in RS
. Zone," Section 22-648, "Accessory Dwelling Units in RS Zone," Section 22-666, "Detached
Dwelling Units in RM Zone," and Section 22-667, "Attached, Detached, and Stacked
Dwelling Units in RM Zone," to clarify side-yard setbacks for comer lots and adding a note
regarding calculation of lot coverage for flag lots; and adding a clarification to Section 22-
Ord. No. 06-
, Page 3
/)~4f:r
EXHIBIT 3_
955 regarding lot coverage calculations for flag lots are consistent~~I;~F.:--S
implement, the following Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) goals and policies:
~-
L UP J 6 - Revise existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility
in the design of new single-family developments and in-fill.
HG J - Preserve and protect the quality of existing residential neighborhoods and
require new development to be of a scale and design that is compatible with existing
neighborhood character.
2. The proposed amendments relating to definitions of flag lot, lot area, panhandle lot, primary
vehicular ac'cess, and property line; adding illustrations for setback requirements for flag lots;
modifying Use Zone Charts Section 22-631, "Detached Dwelling Units in RS Zone," Section 22-
648, "Accessory Dwelling Units in RS Zone," Section 22-666, "Detached Dwelling Units in RM
Zone," and Section 22-667, "Attached, Detached, and Stacked Dwelling Units in RM Zone," to
clarify side-yard setbacks for corner lots and adding a note regarding calculation oflot coverage
for flag lots; and adding a clarification to Section 22-955 regarding lot coverage calculations for
flag lots bear a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare because they provide for
setback and minimum lot size requirements that will ensure adequate and consistently-applied
building separation and buildable lot area requirements for flag lot development within single
family neighborhoods.
And
3. The proposed amendments relating to definitions of flag lot, lot area, panhandle lot, primary
vehicular access, and property line; adding illustrations for setback requirements for flag lots;
modifying Use Zone Charts Section 22-631, "Detached Dwelling Units in RS Zone," Section 22-
648, "Accessory Dwelling Units in RS Zone," Section 22-666, "Detached Dwelling Units in RM
Zone," and Section 22-667, "Attached, Detached, and Stacked Dwelling Units in RM Zone," to
clarify side-yard setbacks for corner lots and adding a note regarding calculation of lot coverage
for flag lots; and adding a clarification to Section 22-955 regarding lot coverage calculations for
flag lots are in the best interest of the residents of the City because they would help ensure that
flag lot development fits in more effectively with traditional single-family lot configurations where
each lot has direct access to the adjacent right-of-way.
Section 3. Amendment. FWCC Chapter 22 is amended as set forth in the attached Exhibit A.
Section 4. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The
invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity
of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the
ordinance, or the validity of its application to any other persons or circumstances.
Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this
ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Ord. No. 06-
, Page 4
/)11 .
#f'4Pr
EXHIBIT2._Q
PAGE-LOF: ,
. '---
.~
Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five (5) days after passage and publication as
provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of Federal Way at a regular meeting of the City Council on the
day of , 2007.
ATTEST:
ApPROVED:
Mayor, Michael Park
City Clerk, Laura Hathaway
ApPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DA,TE:
ORDINANCE No:
File #06-IOSOS9-00-UP
1:\2006 Code Amendments\Flag Lots\LUTC\120406 Meeling\Ordinance.doc
Ord. No. 06-
, Page 5
b~-4Jt")"
Doc ID 38898
A .
EXHIBIT~.. -
PAGEJ-OF---L::
FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE
, Chapter 22
22-1 Definitions
Flag lot or "panhandle lot" means a lot in the shape of a flag or pan that is connected to the
road or street right-of-way by a narrow stri?of land. The narrow strip of land connecting the main
portion of the lot to the road or street right-of-way is the "flag pole" or "access panhandle" part of
the lot.
Lot area means the minimum lot area per dwelling unit based on the underlying zone.
For singie family lots, the area of a yehicular access easement. private tract, "flag pole,"
or "access panhandle" shall not be credited in calculation of minimum lot area.
Pan handle lot means flag lot.
Primary vehicular access means the majef street. vehicular access easement. or private tract
from which the majority of vehicles enter the subject property.
Property line means those lines enclosing the subject property and those lines defining a
recorded vehicular access easement or tract. The following are categories of property lines:
(1) The front property line is any property line that is adjaoent to a right of way whioh is
more than 21 feet in '.vidth, exoludiF!.g Interstate 5. If the subjeot property is adjacent to more than
one right of way whioh is more than 21 feet in width, th.e applicant shall designate whioh of the
adjacent property lines is the front property liRe afld the remainder of suoh adjacent property lines
will be considered as either a rear property line or side property line, based on the definition in
this section. If the soojeet property is not ac:ljaeem: to a right of way '.vkick is more than 21 f-eet iF!.
width, then the front property line is the property line adjacent or priF!.6ipally oriented to the street
providing primary vehieular a6cess to the s\:l9jeet property, as determined by the direotor of the
department of oommunity de',;elopment. The front property line is any property line that is
adiacent to a primary vehicular access. If the subiect property is adiacent to more than one
primary vehicular access, the applicant shall designate which of the adiacent property lines is the
front property line and the remainder of such adiacent property lines will be considered as either a
rear property line or side property line, based on the definition in this section. except the property
line adiacent to an arterial or primary collector shall not be designated as a primary vehicular
access.
(2) For flag lots. the yard setbacks shall be applied per Exhibit B.
~ ill The rear property line is any property line that is farthest from, and essentially parallel
to, the front property line. .
~ ill The side property line is. any property line other than a front property line or a rear
property line.
1:\2006 Code Amendments\Flag Lots\LUTC\120406 Meeting\Ordinance Materials\Definitions.doc
Driveway
for Lot 2/
Access
Easement
. for Lot 1
r------~-~-B~S---~-----I
~ I
III I
"!I 1;0
I Lot 2 III
L - - 1 ICIl
I I
F= I 1
20' I - - - - - - - 5 ';5' - - - - - - - - -I
5= 5'
r----------------
, '
, '
~ , ';0
II I Lot 1 III
N I '(It
~ I I"
L_______________:
~
i
j
1
5= 10'
Or
r-----~----B=~---------I
0' 1
III ,
-: Lot 2 :~
L - - 1 IUt
~, ,-
F= l' ,. . ,
20' -v 1-----..:-5-=-5'---------'
,_______Fi=_5:._________, .
I 1
~ ~
:;" . Lot 1 I:;'
-I ,-
1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __,
r - - - - :.. - - -.- - ..R_=,S'_ - - - - ..:. - - - ,
01 ,
III ,
UlI . 1
-, Lot 21~
'- - - I Ic.n
f--7, I-
~o~! : - - -- - -- - -;. -, -- -- - ----:
r----s=~--------,
1 I
I ,
~ : Lot 1 :~
N
C! I I~
I ,
'- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -,
F=20'
5= 10'
Not an arterial
or prfma-..ycollector
Driveway for Lot 2
and Access Ea$ement
for Lot 1
Arterial or
--"----------
primary collector
Driveway
for Lot 2
Driveway
for Lot 3
and Access
Easement
for Lot 2
r-----------B=~-------~
~ I
III I
UI, L 3 ,;0
-, ot ,II
l___ I~
~, ,
~o~ !: - - - - - - - - -s~= 5'- - - - - - - - :
I-----~=~-------~
I I
~ ' ,
II I L 2 ,;0
N I ot ,II
q I I~
, ,
, ,
~_______________J
5= 5'
R= 5'
-------------------,
I I
~ L t1 ~
II' 0 ,II
~I . ~
! - - _..: - - - - - - - - - - - - - --'
F=20'
Not an arterial
-------------
or primary collector
F = Front Yard
S = Side Yard
R = Rear Yard
~
0
.......
......
C,)
Q)
tI)
<Il
:E
......
s::1
.......
..s:::
t::
..s
......
Q)
<Il
<Il
Q)
......
g
"'C
ij
<Il
s::1
0
.......
~
-
So
~
Q)
-- oS
~ 0
......
......
C,)
- Q)
= .~ E-<
.... .g
- ~
=
~ <Il
'0 Q)
.... s::1 U
foil 0
~ N ~
r;)
.Q 5 0
's N
- ~
=. cd 00
~ ....... ;:l
......
I s:::
~ Q)
- "'C :
t).C) .......
= <Il
.... ~
00
l'f'i ,?;
= .~
0
.... tH
foil I
.... Q)
~ b1:
....
~ .S
<Il
.s
.S
"'C
Q)
t
.@
g
Q)
..0
....; .-
'a Cd
=' ..s:::
~ <Il
~ <Il
Q)
Q:j <Il
~
~ 00
"Cl s:::
"Cl .......
.~ ~
y 0
tIS -
- .-
Q.l ..s
Q Q)
.-4 ..s:::
I"'l
\0 ~
I
M
M
<Il
Z
o
i::::
:s
~
o
w.
t:X:
...
.s
~
o '"
t; E
oj ::>
. E
Z '-
W 1;1
~~
~
~ ~
..g >-
B. ~
~ E 'g.
o ::> <Ll
'0 E t:X:
~ '2
e~
~
ZrJ1
O~
N
S:lOlldS 8u!'IJlld
p:u!nlxl'M
:lJnpn.ijS
JO 1q8!:lH
:l811J:l^O:> 1<>1
(1I0E:l) :lp!S
r-:
<Il
t:X:
u:
U)
z
o
i::::
u
W
t:X:
o
SNon V'fl~311ft
:lZIS 1<>1
SS:lOOJd M:l!i\:l'M
p:l.l!nb:l~
,:,
1:: .,;
K. !!l c
e ~ ~
~ ~
u 0
:B ~ ~
~ "tj "tj
~ c::!.~ .,~~
... .. u
~ ~ ~ (,)
.~ ~ co .g ~
~.~.~ 0 0
-5lU'S ~ U
'o~'E ~ ]
~~~f ~ ~.
~~:e "E s
e'~'~ ~ 8 IU
~;:u e !!l
~ Q) ~.~ ~ ~
8. ~ ~~ ~ -,9 ~
[.~ .~ -5 ~ 0
-ggg 0 g
~ ':= ~ .~ :0
:g'~ g-a: = >
~~:::g. 0 [ l!i~
~E~~ ] ~ ::s
g 'f ~ E OIl . ~ .2
"tj Q) ~ ~ ] ~ .~.~ c;-
~u~o;g. U U a-5 ~
.Q:::.g"5 ~ g e-'o IU
~s&~ ~ ~ ~ jS
~.'" "... ~ ~ 'E ~ ~ >
E~g~ ca~=o~ e~
......IU~ ~~.~~~ ~~
.~ g E.2 ..s B ::s .... '" 'f!
4:l c::! OIl 0 ,g 'S !;! !6.2 0 la 5 -<
~ c 00 e ~ "en.s 'O.g ~ ~
o-o-c::!...c::!;:i!,,~ "~:a-'" OIl;:;
~ ~ 0- & cT ~ ;:: ~ t ~ U ~ ~ i~ '[..r
..gg;~~"tjo~~ ~~~~eg~.~
~~~~~ggg~~ s'~~~~g~~
0"'-.. .o'€~", ...0i!"'l!u5~
=.~.~:~~cog~ ONtn'~~=~1U
..s..~-~._~!~~ ~~s:a~J~~
~'~'-~N~ ca-c" ~ ==U~~S
~~~'~'~'~e~~'F; ~~.got~~~
~EEooo2S~Eo u~~g~X2a
'2~~---~~~8~ ~~~~~uo~
~33~~~~~.5~~ o~~bo~.~~
~'1.5 " E E ".:: ~ B gj .s gJ ~ -~.. ~'f!:S ~
;: ::s .", '-._ ~ .. 0 ~ ~ '" <( ...
-' 's::s." " !E E u 0-'- .s '" ....... 0 J!J
~....ls'Su80-~1 5gj&~:~B
~-==uuuc.-.~~uG.. . 1/")' "T.:t';~6 e
u .. ... -= oS oS 0 .... _ \0 > ~ ~ '. I/") "T.:t MoJo .- e
~ rl ~ vi' vi vi c c.E U 'I:t 0 0 0 i. "$. "$. 0\ .~'s P l.=i ,~ J:! '::I ~
u=cuuuo~\O~o~~ooo~o~~~ O~.g
.~ ~ 2 g S l5'.g, u ~ N ~ JI II \0 \0 \0 N = U 0 x e '€ e en
~OONNNU~~N-ooll II 1I=~~~u~~ .~
s~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~~'~~~g.~e
~ ('f"l - 0\....... ~ u. ,ell C g e ('f"l - 0\ ,..... It''I (.) '€... en Co
~~gJgJgJgJ~lt~lgJgJgJgJgJ~~~I~~tii
. ::s",,::s,,~ ~ "2..,.""" ".5 ..uu.... ..e<:";1 __,.,
.5 _ _ _ _ _ '-'~ (I) ~ ,G; _ _ _ _ (I) ~ (I) _ '1 ~ "
~~~d~.,;~~~~d~~d~.,;w~~~~t2~ ~
..; ~~~~. ~~~~<(~~+
00
~
E-<
o
Z
~
00
Z
o
""I
E-<
<
S
t..:l
~.
~
""I
U
~
~
rJ:J
OIl
"
....:
!l. ~ 'a
",~::l
u bO a
c::! ~ &~.~
o,g~:sl!
('f"lClS~.cu
""
..s
~ g \01
Jll:l'M
c::! 4:l
..0 '"
~~ ~I"'I
1il4:l ~
~ 0 u
~c.~
'" c::! .. c::!
C;;o~ 0
_",0 '"
.. ~
~ -
j, " E s
g 0 OIl 0
rl ~.s :=
..
<]2 ..
CIl
1UOJd
..
"
o
Z
c.l
U)
;:l~
].~
u_
g"Q;-
.. ;t'-
Q"09
.s
'~
1=XHI 311 ~ !
pAGE -Lc E8 g~
u..
.'"
&~~
00 !1 8,.-::
..;8",9
.. ..
~ >
o
oo~
- '"
. ~ ~
u~a ~Su
&:a '~ B .. ~ ~
~'3.!!o~"":
cu.cucuceo
~
o
'0
.:::
'"
c::!
'"
c::!
'"
~ = c
~ 0 ~.s
...,-a--eIl
:.E ~ ~ .
~Eti~~
U 8...2 r--: 'Vi
J!J
E
....
o
-g~ a
....~ 'l:l
.!!l ... "'~
::is .s "3 .-
-Su-.!:!~
grl~xri-8
.9
~...~
.5..s ]
.5 ~:.a
..,..- "
oGi ~._
"0 'i .. :::
'- ~ ~ 1:: d.~ ell
.;; ~ \0::; ~ .~ ~ :a
a g CIS u; .h's: !:! e
zQ.<o~:.aaCl.o
,
....~
gO.S..2 _ 6'
~ !!l ~ ":r:
8,g~~~
~1
S . "'I
g"""-a
;;..,;c
.. . '"
"''''00
00
0;-
'"
'"
CoO?
..
..
'"
.;
]
;;
...
o
OIl
"
';;.
..
~
..
~
B
S
'"
]
0;
~
'"
'"
""
..
.~
.;
'"
~
'"
OIl
:=
:.g
'"
~
"0
"
'"
.0
:=
:g
'"
~
g
o
~
"
o
'l:l
~
..s
.5
...
..
~
o
...
o
U
0-
~
..
'0
.....
'"
.5
~ ,:,
:@ ]
~ 0
.. ..
~ ~
~ e
;~g=g
-~r;''1"''
~g:g:g:g:
- I I I I
=--\0-
.1/")1.000",",
= "';'. "';' r;' ,.
-:~~~~.
8~
e
"-
0-
~
ti
'0
~
o
",0-
'" ~
~u
..
..-
~ M
J-
'E ~
:'=N
:c~
OIl..
] ~
.~ -t9
~ :;
~~
..~
~.~
~g-
E ~
~ "
~~
;t gs"
'0 ~
~ ~
's's
.. ..
~~
~ ...
00
u..u..
N'
'i'
.....
0
'"
M
""
.,:
'"
'i
'"
0
.;
z
'E
0
,..:
0;-
J u
M ~
"" '"
0;. '0
N
'" '"
~ "
'" 0
.; 'l:l
u
Z ..
'E ~
0 ~
'1:
M S
'" '"
0 ~
'" ..
,J. u
"
iii' '"
"
'E
" 0
Ul -.;,
t::" ~ .5
"" U
0 ..
..... ~
'0
M 0
'" ..,.
0
.; '"
z G
'E ~
0
0
0;- .3
.....
~ OIl
'" '"
s %
d "
..
t!- ~
'" 0-
"" ~ ::l
M .;
0
'i -< si:
0 ..
'" "0 5::
0
.; u 0
Z '0 :h
'E 0 0
0 'It
e. 3 "
ii:
.~
......
"0
(\)
<J)
.:B.
....
.~
~
~
~
<J)
~
g
-0
.~
'a
o
......
~
~
(\)
~
~
S
"0
(\)
'..g
<J)
~
~
$
riJ
\~
~
u.
\
~
';:l
'ta
.,-,!
~
.g
......
'8
~
~
......
~
.
~
.~
<J)
~
.~
-0
(\)
~
......
~
(\)
.D
~
~
<J)
<J)
(\)
~
~
......
~
~
~
~
t-'
iJ.
'%
oil
~
'Q)
~
'C
o
'"
'"
Co>
~
~
~
..,
\t:;
.
~
~
<J)
5
%
o
.~
~
...
eo
'"
'"
o
~
1!
~ ,,~~ ~
% ~ ~ H H W~ef%'g.C1E
e~!t <:1_00 ~
.-eO m~~~ i'a
t"'~ ~'i-_~~ ~o ~
." 1.0... · · ·
... >'.' ", '" . .
"'1 ...... · · ·
..w II'~.' · · I
~.. i'" ~~.. ~
~ ~ ~ .0 _ .~ 3 .-;; & ... >- r
t ;;. ., ':.~ ~ ., 'i. ~ ..
.'.!l 0 "3 " .s "" '0 5\' '2 lI. "'. -
- g' "''' >" ~ . .
';::> . '" _ .. _ .~ .~ '" " .S
~~, .l~'" · · .
~ ~ . ':. ~" '" ;." 0 'ii 1
.._ .w.. w: I · -
.11 10'.." · '" ~
"_' II!-.. w · ·
.~~ . p' .....
.~. ....:~ - . .
; ~ ...",." . .
~,,_ I'" ~I" ~ ·
.., I~"'~ - ~ .
_ ~ ~ ~~'S ",.", ~.
,.. ",-,.~' , . .
.."" ".2!t>P- """ ~ '" j!.
. a" y~'~ ~I .. a
.. . ~ e" ... ~ · · '"
"'" ,~ " P. <:I .~ e .~ 15 ';:) .,g.
".~ %.~. ~ %~ ~ ~ ~
~ _ .c ~ ~ ;..~ - .fl ~ ~..,'
_\= ..-."' ,. . ; I ~
~. . : <.. %H.~"'~ ~. · ~
.%.~ 1 ~ ~ '11! :;;,,,,, · ~ (; ';. ~ .. -
..~ ...~..-... . . - .
. ~ p . >. ~. I ... ~. t ' · '
..~ ....._.1". .. · ·
... ...."'..". "0- · ·
,;~ "\i'~~' 'I~~ I
.'" ;i......., i!ll;; ,
.., a P- - \;0 "" " -0 "" '~ p-... .:a ",,,.., g-
..1 -.~~8' .~. ~...8 ~
~ ;. . . ': . . ..~ _! '" ~ e"''' ~ ~ ..
.-t 1~~1,=!,~1 1';1- I
.1. .0.... ..- ..... '
s~~, 19i~~l~~i~ ~'lit ~
% ~ It' .. ~~ .. 3 %< ~ ~ 1i .' ."
,.',\\ \~i~'~\' '1~1\ 1
"" .p .00 ~~<.s...."o~",,8 ~...j:\1,~ ~
1~1.1..",.,."~...d:.I'..'
...~__g..a'~I'1 WW&p..II-'
..aa~~.....:i'. ..Acll~.al'
(;'~i..2~~t..~~~"I,"'I'~I'
111~~~~~~~~1%%%~~~~~~11~~.~
..>...... ~.....~""~~ ".&.~
. ... . _. _. ~ " ". " ~ .~. ., .. ., ... ",,, . .. 'ti '" . ~ % "
..O!.....-..'. ......0.....
.... .~ ,..; P- '" -0 ~ ~ '" ~
.f/J
~
Z
~
f/J
'5
~
~
~
%
~
f/J
.,..
S:l:)lldS '3U~)\l11a %
p:>>~1\b:lll t::
~
:>>1\\:>1\1\S
JO \1.\'3~:l1\
tUcn5
-" " .-
ji--O ~
tU ~ ~
~~"ii
.0>
~&
~~
~
~~
e
.~
~~
-<:l
"
.;:c.
9 ~
" 'to
~ '"
~ ",-<:l
~ %.~
e. e '"
r= '.S ~
;~
u.
ill
5
~
~
Cl
SN01J..'v'1{\~31l~ .
l1) ~.
tA~C'l
:l'3111:l^O:) \<Y1
0>\ ~\
tA\ ~\ <t\
~
111:l1l
\I.\:>ll:l):lP\S
W01:l
:l2\S \0'1
....
o>~
., 0
<J)"
~
e
p..-
?;-S', ~
o bllO" 0
tII c:.-<...-'\ .c
~.~-'~~~
g CL) .~.(i) S'~
..(. t s .s $. e
ss:l:lOJcl M:l\I\:lll
p:ll\ob:lll
~
o~
0'.
1t>
01
-.0 ~
S 01
~ .0
~
,po 0
" ... 'i
1t> ~ '"
~ -01
~...
\0 ",,,,
.s J'"
.~ ...
~ '.::: *'
~-
P- o "
1 .- ...
~ ~..
.~ ;gi
\0 -0 '"
p. ~..,
~ ~e
'i, 0 il
~
~ g
";< .", -a'S
~ % ~\
g a 'Oe
"3 .S ~~
.~ ~ jj~
0 .g~
g ~ 15 15
0
~ IJoo IJooIJoo
g
-<:l
~
~
.~
'Q
.,
~
~
.c:
g
..
~
8
%
--8
9
bll
"
.~
..0
~
~
6
~
~
~
~
~
l
5
~e
....(.
~ ...
S\-<:l
~8
-..0
~~
~~
,..-
.S
~. ~
Pc. :~
~ g
~ ~
~~o....:.ci
~ ~ ~.~ ~
t~~~~
- \ ' \ \
~_.-..o'-
..-:-~~~~
~~~~~
'"
~~
.€
p.
~
r.f)
~
?:.
P
.~
~r.f)
. ?:.
~~~
N~ ~
. ~
~
%
~
~
~
U
~
~
p
rJ)
'5
%
?
~
~
~
a
~
~
o
~
iJ.
...
~
:1
ell
~
...
~
~
-0
.....
~
o
en
en
~
U
~
~
""
'-C
I
~
~
I
~)<.~~\e\1--J\-,-~
fl f).(~~.-S--Of.:..aJ-
'"
<)
.~
.g
c
~
c
';;'
"
,g
~
~
c
'.5
.~
CT
'"
'"
';)
~
~
" ~
""
....
~ "
~ ""
...
"'" 0
.. -; 'q
.. ~~
'"
~ ""',;
~-
",'"
"" ..;-
.~ '6 --7
.._~
"" -;~
P. "';"Q a,)
-0 .~ ..
" ! ~..
oS
"" .<!l~
.~ ~~
""
p. ~-o
;:; ~.~ ~
0 " ~
-'a q
i~ ....
" -;
0 ~'.a a..
.'"
t ~~ '"
""
oS 'Ol!. ....
.~ ~1 ;r
~ .g~ ~
0 ~
w OC
0
u. u.u. t
\
'"
"'"
...
~
'"
l.s
-0
f,
.c
~
.g
e
oS.c<=>":~
~~',:;~~
l *' ~.~ ~
_ \ \ 1 \
::::__-.D'-'
~~~~~
::*'~~~
'"
tI),p;
~ f/fl
e
Po
s,,~lldS ~upplla
?"l\nb"'d
''In\~I\.I\S
JO N~\"H.
,,1l1l.l:lJ\0'J \0'1
lll"'d
~
\;j.
".
(1\~1l:l) "\>!S
-,0 .~\-
t\ .B -5 '0 ~ o.
~~gg~g~
"2..;:; ~ e..... ~.;::
8~:~~~0~
~'jft~P-~.5\ij
c~oi\) '"0
.~ ..,..... -0 ~ '" 'ia
'" c '" i:;''' ..:>
'" ~ '" c '" -0 '"
.~ 0 ~ -;) 'a ~ ~
~ '" ~ ($ -$ ,~ 8
~ -6'.Q t>O 0 ~ ce
'C E '" ,~ ~. E '0
~ob'';:t. 9."
~~'t::.G)~uc
% g g.-$ "?> ~'" ~
0; .;:: ~ -$ 'ia ..:>
t ~ g.- g- ~
-o.':::"'~~%go
.~ ~;g .~ c:. c ";, ~
~ '0 ~ ~ ~ .~ -:. 3
~...,g.ld,~j:lco 1.
%~...e~''''~ -
o.!!e-oo~:a ~
l+'" tcS ~ <3 ~ """ """
~"'8-o","'8 @~ 00
i>~~",~5e ~7 '6
f% ~ ~ 's< .g '" I>- ,-
co.- '" -0 C1' 'ia <).., <.Q>
go ~ .r:. ~ e .... g '€ -0 'S
-0 s::. E ~ '" 0 .- < 3 '"
'" ~ ~2> -$ g ~ '" l!l ~
-$ 'ia '" g:5 -~ ~ ~ g. ~
g..;-$<ao:::>i> 'cig c
~ i> g ~< g ~ '" .- .:'
~ ~ ~ .<g, ~ 8 ~ ,l'~ '0
2> ~ 3 g 0 Q ~ c",,p. ~
:::> ~t>ll.~ g -g ~ .g -$ a lr
~ '" .g .~ i> Q i:;' ~ 9 Q ~
~ -$ 0; P. ~ .~ .~ 'C k: t; '"
l~t ~~~ % e ~-% -$
'" -0 ",? ",.- e t\ .... g. 9
p.~-BO?-o 0'" '" ~
? p..... < ~ '" <> e -$ "8 ~
^.goc;\'3~'OCl!lt: 1.>
~ tQ C < -- u .... '" C'~ -
",0 ,-.g~c'ia"'t:. "ca
~ e ~ '<a .- -0 ~ .... % ~ -$
~.g g 9t., 9 ~ ~ ~ .l:" ~
~ g g ~ ~:a go?, ~ ~ .~
o '0.:::> ~ -;:: '" -0 e '<a .,.
.~ " ~ ~ ~ '" '" '" ~ 'i
.<t .~ '" ~ 0; -5 -$ ~';j;? -
p.~~"""'t>ll-6 ...ej ~
~ ~ i5 -$ 'ia'%.~ ~ &. < I>-
,..\ -5 ~ '0 ~'a ';; '0 ~\.i~ .;.~
"':~s::. 0 e 8.~ ~ ~~ -: ;:;\:
-;\:~-5 % e E~ e:.l':.l'X\~
...
e
~
.0
~
i. '"
~%
... .s
,~
.. '$
~
~
-0
C
...
9
i
-0",-0
~ % .~
e..s 5
\- .~ ~
(/)'$
~
I>-
iJl
'5
~
~
O.
sN.O\J. 'V'1n.93'd~
WOld
:l2\S \0'1
SS~~Ola M~!""'l:l.
?:l_I\nb"'d
\Sl
rJ)
';),::)
.....
\
...
<=>
o
7-
-d
o
r::
~
....
'"
"'"
~
....
a..
o
7-
-d
o
on
!
'1
-
g
,..,
"'"
.,;
...
J..
c-
o
7-
-d
Q,
i:
"
:-
.",
g
~
.g
00
$
~
g
"i)
'"
~
~
~
'$
t\
~
.s
-0
9
t>ll
.~
'"
'$
-0
~
<::>
,...
6
...
3
'0
3
t>ll
'"
~
~
'"
.%
C
~e
8<
. '"
~-o
~8
-;-0
'ig
,g~
...-
(fJ
.....
.s
0
.....
-€
~
ns
(fJ
vi
~
+-'
g
'd
g
g
.....
~
So
~
I-<
~
.s
B
i +-'
(,)
~
.,.....,
.g
~ (fJ
~ ~
.... 0
..-
~ 0
N
"CI ~ t:Q
.... U
rIl
~ ~
'-" Z
. 0>:> ca ~
1 .....
~ ~
.~ .g rn
..... ~
..;: .....
(fJ
_. ~
~ I-<
~
~ .~
~
Q .....
.... .:=.
, rIl %
....
.~
~.. ~
+-'
.$
"Cl
~
~
.....
5
po.
~
i ,Q
-;:::l
.... to
d
::l ~
l:)I)
d (fJ
.... ~
~ (fJ
a> ::3
~ ~
'0
'0 .....
a> ~
~ 9-
~ .-
a> ~
A ~ ~
. \J:/ 0
\J:/ .....
\J:/ t-' +-'
I (,)
~ ~
~ (fJ
(fJ
9
5
~
o
~
...
e
;,.
'"
e
g
~e
:x:: %
I-' .-
.~
:~
.,
'"
:0
-0
'"
l;::<
9. ~ '"
~ '5~
'" '" <r.....
.g 6 ~ or.
-0 % \
e 'S
~~
e;
u..
.n
~
9
i
Cl
EXH1B'T-
.~_._'... ~ ,-
1---- Or::~~ "-:
..W!-F r:
0-
n^"'-
~ -n'" Ir
....
~ ~ j
~ . ~ ~ ~
e ~o O. t:
g ~- .~."%~
.~ g- .'!. S e ~
~ 0. ~
~ 08 'a~'~
..s ,~() ~ ----
~ ~~ ~::'O
~~] ~.g%
.~ 9 ~,. ~ '.~ '.~
.s ,:. -fi ~ e
~ ~~ ~c:Q. ..
\l\"'''' .s~~-E~
~ ~.~ '~ 0 0 ,e It
Iii l:!! "J!l:J;:g""3
.. ~ "" ,S .~ U ".s ,'tj c,,'
e ~ 's tf) 0 a' 't1
:;; .. ',a. ~ 9 <> ~ .... ~
~ --5~ -d%.!!~uo(U
~. ,l!l g ~ -a ~ '% ~ ~ ::: 0;;
:.. .s'o ~t:",;:::~o.>a;-
<.l '0 ~ .~ ~ ~ g: " %. ~ ~
Q) ~g .........s~"Og."Owr.
.~ .9 '0 e 0 'i 0 't: ,... '€ 3
~ 's -;; 11 ,~ -a '.g :; .s. ~';;
.s e .s m'~ e"? 0 .~ ~ ~
g ?- e"< ~ ~ % ~ g ~o. <l.g
"'0 -% ~ E '" ~ 4) "a 'i:i) U ~
~ -" "5 '€, -0 <I> ,. 11'<;: 's ....
\1"'''>; ;::,::,-8l:eao.~
!il ~ ~, 0 ~ >- ~ p..-1 u ~
u 0 ~ ~ t:: -d ::;. ~ u ..:.s 's..
.cC=I\)-5 .g~~~.sBg~
~ s ,s:.. ~ 'f! ";' '" ::i It )I-
l:-a5~ ]~'~'Ox-'3~~
.~ ~ 4) fd ~ Po a ~ ~.~ g. 9
S ~ '" ~ .. 9>. .. '" 'e oS 'ia
..0.ge .s..oe4......s~
,go,;.8 ~gg~....~l!l~
Q) tt:. u 0 .- 4=t 0 >- c: ~
~ u ~ ~o N .~ S '8 x e i
c:J4.)~ V"'>>~o o~e~
g'O~-13 .J,~il~~:~~.g ~
a~';:.-B!"'~8.!!e4.~:%
~ u '" II ~ 5 .$ .. -e 0. s ~ l>
e ~ "'" -e "" -'" '" a 4.:S ...:;; %.
<;!",9",,,g~~,,~$"~
= .;: ~ ~ .~. ~ u ... ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~
*- g-~* S~"';18-o\"a'-:\oOlo'l
";~M,.;oS.,:.t~..\'8..\;...!irt:
S3:ltdS ~upptJ
\l31\nb31l
..
.S
..:::
" " ..
;;~-~
t> ~ .~
o.~t....
~ 8 ;;~
rn
~
o
z
~~\
~
8
~
%
~
:l.lnl:ltUl8
JO l\(8\3H
~
~ ~~.g
~e:g~
~ ~'$~
....
o
Q)bOg ~g
'8 ~ i! ~ .~ 9 ~ ~ lID
.--o"'S"'O~":<'
~~~~'(jj,~Q)~e
3~1U3^O::> lO'1
..~~
S~\~otJ\
\Dtf)\~c.-..2\
~
@
lt31l ~
4l
'"
'"
(q:lt3) 3\>\8
1~\~""
4l
'"
lU01:l ~4l
~
3Z\ 8 \0'1 ,;.
'"
8
'"
~~
o = c:.
~ ~ ~ ';'
:a ~ \l\ e
0';:; 2 ~
::tEl!l"'~
" Q) 0 r- .-
y p.._ . U')
- :!.-
'd Si .S ~ ~
!t: ~ E t: '~';< ~
t.) lU eo.- t. 8
5e..:~~e
:zo.aoao'>;
..tl
SS3:l01J M3\^3)l
p:l.l!nb31l
"
g
:z
..
"
e
~o~g-.-
~ .- ;; ~
o'!l"u
u~.s~
S~01.L V'1fl~1nl1\
..
s
~~
'0.,,:::
fl;;
" ~
p'"
~
~:::)
,;.
"
'"
-.;
..,
r-
';l
~
.u.
"
"
'"
'"
..
~
..
'"
.~
..
0.
, '"
"
..
..
"
.~.
0.
~
o
~
"
o
.",
%
.s
.S
..
~
~
J
....
.. 0
9. ~~ 5
g '<;'€ ''''?:
~ c.~ A ~ ~ -
.~ c:::p -. ~ :j';:n
.e ~ :e ~ ~ ~ 5
';11.'", \(l rn X <.l '"
..:
<I> .."
B..
g",
~ ~
(1) \1'\'.
~
"
..,
~
~~
~~
,,-
",.",
J-
'~ -;:.
-..::~
~o~
.~ ~
:;;~
.s ..
",'"
g~
~.3
,.,'if
~~
2~
-3 ~
'O~
.J!l.J!l
's'~
.g-8
~ ~
o 0
........
~
';::i'
q
<;:.
0-
'"
"'"
.;
q
~
~
-.a
o
;.::
0;-
:}
'"
"'"
.g
-0
-0
-q
~
'"
o
''5
.,
~
OJ
'n
~
8
~
'0
9.
.~
'8
~
-D
~
~
6
3
11
3
~
%
g
.g
g
~
~
o
U
-D
o
o
~
....
~
q
'"
'"
~
~
.;,
g
.!!
,;;
0,
<'t
\;,
o
:z
-.a
o
'"
a;-
o
~
Ii.
~
r-
"'"
c5
'=7
'"
'"
o
,;:z
l] ~ ~
.c .~ 0
~ a~
~ 2 ~
(0..00 ~o ~
~'A~~~ €
~~\~~~ ~
~, 1 \ 1 ~
:::~~:c~~tQ:
:::: ,~-~~ ~
~~~~~ ~
~:: g
e 0
l>< :z
-.a
Q,
'.S
,,;
~
oa
=
~
:S
Q:j
~
"C
"C
Q,l
~
y
~
~
'"
-0
Q,l
..c:
y
~
~
Q,l
"C
-0
Q,l
.s:;l
y
~
~
<
r-
\0
\0
I
N
N
en
:.s
o
......
"€
tB
.....
Q)
en
en
Q)
.....
o
o
"'0
~
en
o
o
'.g
~
Q)
I-<
Q)
..s
o
.....
.....
c..>
Q)
.=
.g
en
Q)
o
o
N
~
.-
ro
......
.....
~
"'0
......
en
Q)
I-<
>-
]
e+.::<.
......
.....
'3
8
Q)
..s
o
......
"'0
Q)
:t::
.~
0..
Q)
.0
.-
.-
ro
...t::
en
en
Q)
en
~
00
o
.~
o
.-
.:8
Q)
...t::
f--I
E-<
~
::r:l
u
~
z
~
~ en
rJJ 6
~ 1=
:5
::J
o
UJ
a::
'-
<8
'"
'"
2
~
i' E
UJ ::>
:r: E
I- '~
:2
(I)
'"
::>
"0
c:
!;:
B
'"
'E
'"
c: >-
~ "0
-0 E e
--g :J "5
~ E (I)
~:S a::
~:2
Li:
en
;Z
o
.f=
u
UJ
a::
is
~
S:l:l1!d S gUPfJed
p:lJ!nb:l~
:llleJ:lAO:) 1<>1
SS:l:lOJd ,^:l!A:l~
p:lJ!nb:l~
S/lJOU V'1nD3~n
o
o
......
.....
c..>
Q)
en
:lJnt:ln.llS
j01tjg!:lH
(q:le:l) :lp!S
:lZ!S 1<>1 .
EXHIBIT-A__=_ ___'.~._ _
( F--8L::
- 8
~
E-<
o
Z
~
~-5]S ~ fp ~.J-1P(.;1-
:::-5@. ~ ~ ~ -5'~
o ~ > ~ ~'s
.~ ~ E ~ 5 ~ ~ 0 ~ 1! .~
3 :; '3 :0 E ~ g- sg ~ ~ 0._ ~
.._50 ,_so ,_so ~ .~ .5>> e '2 ~ ~.g ~ ]
~ ~ ~ .~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~. ~ ~ ~.!9 ~ e ~ ~ ] ~"3 ~
~~;~~~~~ fi ~ ] ~IJ~~
~ co ~ g- ~ 8 '0 ~ ~ ~.- ... ~
e ~ ~ ~ ;g .s. '$.:.0... .;.E ~ 's
~ 2 2 .g -5 e ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~
1)~'oe:2~~ _=0 td € ~~g
c:::~~....~ ~ Po ~~~
~ ~ g ~] ~;.~ ~ ~] ,~'6
o 0 g ~.~.5'~ ~ cS .~ co ~""O X
~ ~ 00 0 ~ 0 ~ ~..g ~ X at
MN-:~t:.8e<=::'€ ~ ". V"I:J:~ uU) cT
~~~~-g~e~? ~ .s .';;.9.g 0_ g
.!! ~ ~ .~ ~ E 6 ~ ~ l!i .g '5 ~.s ~ 11 ~ ~ ~
.. ~ ~ ~ 8. ~ ~ .!! : ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 's .~ .5 ~ oS! ft u) cu s ~ co ... g]i 0 OJ = ~ N N
g 6 0 ~ ~ ~ c 'B '0 0 l;:;.5 ~ ct: t::! ~ fE's ~ E ~ M
o 0 0 8"O.g 8. c oS -;: c.E -a e 9 ,n ~ ~ ~ 0'" 'S' U tGn
~~~~;~i~!~ ~,g ~~~~ ~~! ~~;~ ~
._ e e e . E g. 8. ~ ~ ~ .9 g g g g 'G ~:; 'l5. <( ~ .S "
9 8. 8. 8. ~ ~ e [oS.g t) = .~.~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ e tf ~ ~ ~
~ e e e g ~,~ tJ ~ ~ .E ~ "3"3::S Q. U II) g:'~]: ~ be
:.= ~ c. c. ~ II) oS U .!! ra ~ - ~ 11 ~ ~ -.: is I- C. ra ~ .5
~ ~ 1i ~ ~ 5.Ji:g :0 ~ ~ "B u u u!t= i ~] ~ .s ~ 'g ~
~ :.g :g :g 2 go 9 ~ ,~.; ,g ~ oS oS -5 J!i is is;'o .50 B ~ ~ :
'u II) VI VI ~ -g e 0:5 tIS ~ . ~ u ~ ~ '0 'r:::! L:,,' 'f '1::0- eo.>. c:: u a
p. u u u c I;, 2 ~ .c :r. ....J t.) >. ~ 3 0 II) ra - ._ ..t:
~ ~ ~ 0:5~ .~ 'g. ~ 'd; g :E ~ ~ ~ '! ~ :a 00:E 0. e-'B ~ g: ~ B ~
ni ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0.0 u lI) u .... u .~ .~ :.E ~ ~ ~ c:: c::s ~
S g g g ~ .~ 9 ~ ~.~ tE: tS ~ ~ ~ E; E! ~ ~ ~o ::0 8, :3 ~ 00 ~ 3-
~NNN~0:5r.S"'d33U~~O>339.fi~ -':;:00):;
o ~ ~ :; ~ ~ .5 ~ 's. ~ .~ ~ 1I):g .~ .~ 's ] g fo ~ [ . S; ~ .~ ~ ,g
-~9 ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ ~ ct: ~ =,,- ~ ~ >. ~ 's .~ ~ -5 ~'4) g- t; ~ X E ~ oS ~
~ ... ~ .., ~ tIS oS ~..t: I+:; \0 VI ~ e .~. ~ 0
ni 0.. - 0 '" E ~ 0 ~ ~ "'d J:! J ~ U'- $ ~ 'l:t .- ,~'3 3 S '::1
;:: oS oS oS ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ <l ~ ~ ~ t-o t-o t-o "" ~ t-o i= 0;- -5 ~ C' E ';;; l'l
:3 cO .c c.i o.!! '5 ~ :g u ~ = "'d"3 cd .0 c.i ~ ~ cd .0 ~ :€ <( e E'~ E
.5 .u < Co.2 0 -fi o.g B.] a ~ g ~ 9 ~ 8 ~ ~
.S -[ u; K ~ .5 ~ -: 3 4! t: 8 -= .~ ~ ~': ::; c; ....
E lI) U .... ~ Q) "Q '- VJ 0 Q) >< = Q) ..... Q) 0 u.. U. U
U ~:~ ~ -5 ~ ::; ~ ~ :z: ~ fJJ' Q.) VJ .~ ~ u.. 'I 'I '6
F-:: f= ..c :s' "" :g .... S en ",I :g -o1.~"':1 5l 001 ",I ~ = ~
..: .~] "'_ g"" i;l'~ E..; g "" ~ E ... 'g. vii :3 -d;.r'j: <>Ii cf; J&
bO t.) .~ .fl] ~
]~ tt!u~
t"ii"'dl1 ~~~~.~
~ ~ oS '~ ..: oS 5 "" 9
rJJ
Z
o
.....
E-<
-<
S
Co-'
~
3
u
~
~
rJJ
"! ~
~~~?t
i2"'dCO
oS ~ [il ~
~ cS
.gubOS"gbO
= G~ .~ "fi ~ :l
o > '9 ~ ~ ~'2
f'l~.oQ.)~"'C:3
-<>1
'<t
8
o
c
"
"
en
00':::
QJ ~ g-....; ~
~._ '.0 ~ 'en Q.)
lii ~ ~ ti: ~ ~
~.Eu.s2~
Cl) bO a
r? ~ '.c
~'9]
"or> "
.5 ~ ..5 ~ Q) :; Q)
~~~~~2]2
311 il ~ ]1
Je:l~
.:::
'"
~ JlI ~I"'I
1UOJd
.:::
o
'"
c:r co ~ c gf'
'" -5 ~ 0 'c
g '~ .~ ~ ] ~ 0.
~~~~~.s~
B
g
"
"
Vl
'"
'"
"
e:'"
c.._
~
C/)
::J~
l!J.
.... 'S
o ::l
-g-g"'d~
-fl"fiQ)=
!9 !9"~ QJ
<~~~
-
I
i'ii'
g
....
0<>>
o
....
o
....
'"
o
z
'E
o
-ci >. 0'"
~ ~ ~
~ t.) ~
~ ~ N
~ e G;'
;~g::g vi
~~~~~ ~
~NNNN ~
:::~. I I I M"
-~~\O~;::; ~
=:N~;Z~ 0\
-NNNN 0
~CQ:: Z
Sea:
e
c..
.S
&
1;l
~
-<>
'<t
o
~ [
0<>>-
" "
,,-
"'....
J-
'E ;::;
;':;N
Eo<>>
00"
] ~
:g]
"" >-
"""
~ .~
" C'
>-~
g 00
~.5
~]
1; "eo
~.!d
'g 'g
~~
~ ~
o 0
........
"
o
o
~
'"
'i'
....
o
'"
......
0<>>
~
'"
"l'
'"
o
o
z
'E
o
q
....
..;.
......
0<>>
.,;
00
",.
o
~
'E
o
0;
0;-
'"
......
......
....
....
cI,
'"
~
'E
o
,:.:
0;-
~
......
.g
,..:
-<>
"?
'"
'"
c
o
'.c
il
~
..
'1:
"
~
~
"
~
c
~
~
c
..c
II
~
-<>
o
..
o
'"
6
~
l!J
.3
00
"
~
]
c
~
<(
~
o
U
-<>
o
o
~
u
Ii:
;;
~.
,.,
'"
o
z
'E
o
M
'"
o
'"
..;.
!3
8
'"
on
~
o
:;;;
g
'E
S
FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE
Chapter 22.
EXH'8Ir-A_~,-=
PAGE_..LOEj_~
22-955 Calculating lot coverage.
(a) General. Except as specified in subsection (b) of this section, the area of all structures,
pavement and any other impervious surface on the subject property will be calculated as a
percentage of total lot area, exclusive of the area of any recorded access easements, in
determining compliance with maximum lot coverage required in this chapter. If the subject
property contains more than one use, the maximum lot coverage requirements for the
predominant use will apply to the entire development.
(b) Exceptions. The following shall be excepted from the provisions of this section:
(1) A wood deck will not be considered as an impervious surface for :maximum lot coverage
proposed if the deck is constructed with gaps between the boards and if there is a pervious surface
below the deck.
(2) A vehicular acce.ss easement~ ef private tract., or that portion of a private driveway located
within the "flag pole" or "access panhandle" part of the that serves more than one lot will not be
used or considered in determining compliance with the maximum lot coverage requirement of
this chapter.
(3) One-half of the area covered with grass grid pavers will be considered as impervious
surface in determining compliance with the maximum lot coverage requirement of this chapter.
(Ord. No. 90-43, ~ 2(115.90), 2-27-90; Ord. No. 98-309, ~ 3, 1-6-98)
1;\2006 Code Amendments\Flag Lots\LUTC\120406 Meeting\Ordinance Materials\Section 22-955.doc
,"
2006 Stakeholder's Recommnedations
The following are a result of the 2006 meeting with Development Stakeholders. This
summary was provided to all that attended and.we received no additional comments.
tlarifying staff comments are added for tonight's meeting in italics.
Short Term Projects
. Bonding- The following will be on the 2007 Planning Commission work program for
Council prioritization.
~ . eliminat~ or reduce the scope bonds for onsite infrastructure
~ reduce bonds proportionally to remaining construction costs
~ . allow alternate methods to financially secure public improvements
~ clarify criteria for bonding landscaping and critical area plantings,
. Notification. .. .
~improve notification of upcoming code amendmerIts and interpretations-
Stakeholders suggested creating a internet comm~nication link that provide
this information to interested parties.
. ~ provide internet application trackirig- This is already being worked on by the
MIS Department and will at least partially implemented in 2007. .
~ provide early permit fee estimates-This is an interdepartmental coordination
issue that staff will work on the first quarter of 2007.
~ allow on:-lineinspection requests
. . Staff Training/coaching- Thefollowing are mostly training issues.that Public Works
and Planning will work on. Some of these are symptoms of having many new staff.
~. empower staff to make decisions .
~ don't take things personally
~. be clearer and more accurate on submittal requirements
~ offer experienced solutions to problems
~ orientation of counter staff- 50% of counter staff have been in their positions
less than 6.months. Training will be on-going.
~. . importance of identifying all issues up front .
~ improve coIisisten(;y of planners interpretation of code (e~g. design)-. The City
is looking at ways to make design interpretations more consistent. One
approach that we are looking into is hiring an architect that 'will provide
technical support on a case by case basis.
~ improve w'~t1and consultant management/hir~ in house staff. Staff are drafting
anRF'P for wetland consultant. .
~ legal issues take too long to resolve- The Legal Department generally
provides excellent turn around time. We will work with them on issues that
generally take longer.
~ inspectors must clear out inspections- This is an inspector expectation and has
been reinforced. . . .
.,.
.J'
. Temporary Certificates of Occupancy
~ create temporary certificate of occupancy process- The City provides a limited
access agreement. It was clear at the Stakeholders meeting that this
agreement isn't clearly understood by developers and staffwill need to look
into whether it is meeting the needs of lenders. . .
Lon2 Term Projects .
. LakehavenlCity
~ Lakehavento survey customers .
~ coordinate right-of-way permits for utility installation
~. coordinate development permit review
~ provide city hall space to Lakehaven staff. . .
. . Code Issues- These issues will need more investigation and will need further staff
research.
. ~ plats (}fetoo detailed
~ require too much information too early in the process
~ site plan. review process adds significant time
~ city manipulation of 120 day review clock
~ front door design orientation to street- This isci design issue that staffand
. Council need to revisit. .
. Surveys
~ benchmark permit services with other cities- Staff completed a survey like t~is .
about 3 years ago but can look at this again. .
. ~ improve city survey
. Other Agencies
~sponsor meeting with PSE, Comcast and Quest to improve permit services
. There was also a general discussion on staffi.ng levels. There was a general agreemeni
that permit fees should be looked at and if the City could guarantee a better level of .
. ..
service, developers would not oppose raising fees.
Other Staff Ideas:
Meet with Real Estate Brokers
Investigate some of the good ideas we.have learnedfrom visiting other cities.