Council PKT 04-06-2010 RegularCITY OF
,'.� Federal Way
AGENDA
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
Council Chambers - City Hall
April 6, 2010 — 7:OOpm
www. cityoffed eral wa y. com
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PRESENTATIONS
a. Certificates of Appointment: North Lake Management District
b. Local Federal Way High Schools State Wrestlers
c. Arts Commission Featured Artist Marshall Johnson
d. City Manager Emerging Issues / Introduction of New Employees
e. NFL Hall of Famer — Floyd Little (Reception Following)
4. CITIZEN COMMENT
PLEASE COMPLETE A PINK SLIP & PRESENT /T TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO
SPEAK/NG.. When recognized by the Mayor, come forward to the podium and state your
name for the record. PLEASE LIM/T YOUR COMMENTS TO THREE (3) MINUTES. The
Mayor may interrupt comments that exceed three minutes, re/ate negatively to other
individua/s, or are otherwise inappropriate.
5. CONSENT AGENDA
Items listed below have been previously reviewed in their entirety by a Council Committee of three
members and brought before full Council for approval; all ifems are enacted by one mo6on. Individual
items may be removed by a Councilmember for separate discussion and subsequent motion.
a. Minutes: March 16, 2010 Special and Regular Meeting, March 23, 2010
Special Meeting. Pg..3
b. Monthly Financial Report Pg..14
c. Vouchers Pg..29
d. RESOLUTION: Findings, Goals and Conclusions for the Medical Device
Commercialization and Innovation Incubator Project Pg..66
e. Agreement for Probation Services Pg..72
f. Interlocal Agreement with City of Auburn for Conservation Resource Manager
Pg..86
g. Council Bill #530/Proposed Text Amendments to FWRC - Accessory Dwelling
Unit (ADU) Size Calculation, Minimum Lot Size and Housekeeping.
Amendments Pg..94
h. Council Bill#531/Proposed Text Amendments to FWRC - Appraisal
Requirements Pg..123
i. Council Bill #532/Proposed Text Amendments to FWRC - Short Subdivision
Notice Pg..163
j. RESOLUTION: Preliminary Plat Approval — Norpoint Heights Pg.. 984
The Council may add items and take action on items not listed on the agenda.
k. S 356� at SR99 Intersection Improvement Project — Project Acceptance
Pg..322
I. SR 99 HOV Lanes Phase III (Dash Point Road to S 284 Street)
Improvement Project — Project Acceptance and Retainage Release Pg..324
m. Citywide Pedestrian Improvement Program Pg..326
n. S 348th Street at 1 st Avenue South Bid Award Pg..336
6. COUNCIL BUSINESS
a. Park Picnic and Special Event Rates Pg..339
7. INTRODUCTION / FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
a. CB#533 Proposed Franchise Aqreement with Lakehaven Utilifir District
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, Granting
Lakehaven Utility District, A Municipal Corporation, A Nonexclusive Franchise to occupy
the Rights-of-Way of the City of Federal Way, Washington, through the Franchise Area
for the Purpose of Constructing, Maintaining, Repairing, Renewing and Operating a
Water and Sewer System Within and Through the City of Federal Way and Addressing
Hydrant Costs Within City Boundaries. Pg..342
8. COUNCIL REPORTS
9. CITY MANAGER REPORT
10. EXECUTIVE SESSION
• Property Acquisition Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(c)
• Potential Litigation Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)
11. ADJOURNMENT
The Council may add items and take action on items not listed on the agenda.
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 6, 2010
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CI'�'Y COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
ITEM #: Sa
SUB.TECT: CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
POLICY QUESTION Should the City Council approve the draft minutes of the March 16, 20I0 Special
Meeting, March 16, 2010 Regular Meeting and the March 23, 2010 Special Meetings?
COMMITTEE N/A
CATEGORY:
� Consent
❑ City Council Business
❑ Ordinance
❑ Resolution
MEETING DATE: N/f1
❑ Pnblic Hearing
❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY: Carol McNeilly Ci Clerk� DEPT Human Resources
' •--- ......................._......--
_._. . _. _.... ................._. __._...._.._ ___�.......�__.�.�.....___ _----_..,....._._._. � .. . . _ _._ ......�...---..�.......__....---..............................................._...__ __....._ _..�.�.—.�.------
Attaehments:
Draft meeting minutes from the March 16, 2010 Special Meeting, March 16, 2010 Regular Meeting and the
March 23, 2010 Special Meetings?
Options Considered:
1. Approve the minutes as presented.
2. Amend the minutes as necessary.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving the minutes as presented.
CITY CLERK APPROVAL: N/fl DIRECTOR APPROVAL N/fl N/A
Committee Council Comitritcee Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I MOVE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED".
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 157 reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment readiag
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinnnces only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION #
CITY OF
,'�. Federal Way
MINUTES
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
Council Chambers - City Hall
March 16, 2010 - 5:30 pm
www. cityoffed eralwa y. com
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor Kochmar called the Special Meeting of the Federal Way City Councii to order at 5:30 pm.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Linda Kochmar, Deputy Mayor Dini Duclos, Councilmembers
Jeanne Burbidge, Jack Dovey, Jim Ferrell and Mike Park. Councilmember Roger Freeman arrived at
6:35 pm.
Staff present: City Manager/Police Chief Brian W ilson, City Attorney Pat Richardson, and Deputy City
Clerk Stephanie Courtney
2. EXECUTIVE SfSSION
At 5:30 pm the Council adjoumed to Executive Session to discuss Property Acquisition Pursuant
to RCW 42.30.110(1)(c) and Potential Litigation Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i).
Mayor Kochmar left Executive Session at 6:45 pm.
3. ADJOURNMENT
Deputy Mayor Duclos adjoumed the Special Meeting at 6:50 pm.
Attest:
Stephanie Courtney, Deputy City Clerk
Approved by Council on:
City Council Minutes — March 16, 2010 Special Meeting Page 1°f 1
CITY OF
�, Federal Way
MINUTES
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING .
March 23, 2010
Hylebos Conference Room - City Hall
Immediately Following Adjournment of the
Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee Meeting
www. cifyoffederalway. com
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor Kochmar called the Special Meeting of the Federal Way City Council to order at 6:46 p.m.
Councilmembers Present: Mayor Linda Kochmar, Deputy Mayor Dini Duclos, Councilmembers
Jeanne Burbidge, Jack Dovey, Jim Ferrell, Roger Freeman and Mike Park.
Staff Present: City Manager/Police Chief Brian Wilson, CityAttomey Pat Richardson, and DeputyCity
Clerk Krystal Roe
2. COUNCIL BUSINESS
Purchase and Sale Aareement for Former AMC Theaters Site:
Economic Development Director Patrick Doherty provided a background review of this project. He
noted United Properties, the developer, is seeking a six-month extension of their contract in order to
pursue funding for the project. Mr. Doherry introduced Victor Setton, President and Director of United
Properties. Mr. Setton stated his desire to see the project built. He noted the very difficult financing
climate and the benefits of encouraging non-traditional financing through the proposed
immigrafion/residency enhancement modeL
The Council asked Mr. Setton to describe his relationship with Lander Korus. Mr. Setton explained
SIBC Holdings was a potential financier for the project but appear to be no longer interested in
participating in the process. He is unaware of any otherfinancing options for Lander Korus. Mr. Setton
continues to communicate with Lander Korus but they have not been able to demonstrate lending
ability.
Meanwhile, he has another highly interested investor for the project and will continue to seek others
during the e3ctension. He assured the Council the one investor currently interested shows great
promise.
The Council inquired about costs to the City if an extension is granted. Mr. Doherty replied the cost is
approximately $100 every two months for utilities. There are no other out-of-pocket costs.
MOTION: Councilmember povey moved to authorize a six month extension to the contract
with United Properties. Deputy Mayor Duclos second. VOTE: Motion carried 6-1,
Councilmember Ferrell dissenting.
City Council Minutes — March 23, 2010 Special Meeting Page 1 of 2
MOTION: Councilmember povey moved to require a monthly status reportJupdate from United
Properties to be presented at the Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs
Committee. Further moved to clarify there will be no further extensions to this agreement with
United Properties. Deputy Mayor Duclos second. VOTE: Motion carried 7-0.
3. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Kochmar adjoumed the Special Meeting at 7:15 p.m.
Attest:
Krystal Roe, Deputy City Clerk
Approved by Council:
Ciry Council Minutes — March 23, 2010 Special Meeting Page 2 of 2
GITY 6F
,'��..., Federal Way
MINUTES
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
Councii Chambers - City Hali
March 16, 2010 - 7:OOpm
www. cityoffederal wa y, com
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor Kochmar cailed the regular meeting to order at the hour of 7:06 pm
Councilmembers Present: Mayor Linda Kochmar, Deputy Mayor Dini Duclos, Councilmembers
Jeanne Burbidge, Jack Dovey, Jim Ferrell, Roger Freeman, and Mike Park.
Staff Present: City Manager/Police Chief Brian Wilson, CityAttomey Pat Richardson, and Deputy
City Clerk Stephanie Courtney. �
DEPUTY MAYOR DUCLOS MOVED TO AMEND TONIGHTS AGENDA TO MOVE CONSENT
ITEM (M) TO THE PUBLIC HEARING SECTION 6(b); SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
FERRELL. Motion passed unanimously.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Scout Leader Josh.
3. PRESENTATIONS
a. Certificates of Appointment: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee
Councilmember Jack Dovey congratulated Aimee Tylor and Emma Bulalacao-Brooks who have
recently been appointed to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. Both were unable to attend
tonight's meeting; their certificates will be mailed. •
b. Municipal League Public O�cial of The Year
Mayor Kochmar was pleased to announce Councilmember Jeanne Burbidge has been selected
as the Municipal League's Public Official of the Year. She noted this prestigious award has been.
presented annually since 1960 and recognizes people and organizations that make significant
contributions to civic life in our community.
c. Valley Cities 2010 Community Achievement Award for Collaboration
Mayor Kochmar was also happy to announce City Manager/Police Chief Brian Wilson has been
awarded the 2010 Community Achievement Award for Collaboration from Valley Cities
Counseling and Consultation. Valley Cities is a community behavioral health center with
outpatient clinic in Aubum, Federal Way, Kent and Renton.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes — March 16, 2010 Page 1 of 7
d. City Manager Emerging Issues / Introduction of New Employees
• Traffic Safety on 312 Ave.
In response to citizen concerns City Manager/Police Chief Brian Wilson asked Assistant Chief
Andy Hwang to brief the Council regarding the traffic safety issues. Deputy Chief Hwang noted
this area is rated below average on collision rate. He stated there would be a new sign installed
in the area to give more waming of the merging tra�c.
• Red Light Photo Infractions
The City Manager stated in response to questions he has received regarding the Red Light
Traffic Enforcement; he has asked Officer Ron Potts to give a report to Council. Officer Potts
showed various videos of traffic infractions including school zone and red light offenses. He
further noted this video is also helpful in minor accidents to review the details of accidents and
they have been able to incorporate some of the video into traffic school training.
• Address Issue with Census
Human Services Manager Lynnette Hynden gave a brief report on the Census addressing issue.
She stated residents are receiving their census information with incorrect city's listed. Ms.
Hynden noted this is a US Postal System error, and the census information is actually tied to the
house and street address. She encouraged citizens to bring any questions to the local census
o�ce or contact her o�ce for further clarification. She reiterated if you live within the city limits,
your census information will be counted for Federal Way regardless of what city is listed on your
mailing label.
City Manager Brian Wilson also reported back to Council regarding recent comments by citizen
Betty Taylor. He noted Ms. Taylor had asked Council to enhance the crosswalk located behind
the Commons Mall on 324 and Belmore Park. Mr. Wilson was pleased to announce staff has
recently installed a flashing beacon — however after it was installed it was damaged by a hit and
run driver. The new waming sign will be soon re-installed.
4. CITIZEN COMMENT
Scot Henderson and Phil Dalrvmple, spoke in support of the the Federal Way National Little
League. They thanked Council for grant funds that went to repair and replace many of the
facilities, and has increased energy and excitement for the Federal Way National Little League.
They invited Council and citizens to stop by for a game.
Carroll Fischer (comments read into record by Deputy City Clerk) would like to increase the
usefulness by having a concession stand at Celebration Park. He would like to see it built byand
employed by the unemployed and local homeless.
H. David Kaplan, spoke is concern over the Census issue with addressing errors. He further
reminded of the deadline of March 31 for Spring round of the Tourism Enhancement Grants
(TEG).
Nikolay Kvasnvuk, spoke in support of creating a Russian Liaison position at the city. He noted
the Ukrainian/Russian/Slavic population is the third largest in the city.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes — March 16, 2010 Page 2 of 7
Serqev Lobodzinskiy, spoke in support of creating a Russian Liaison position at the city. He said
he has built a home and life in Federal Way and would love the opportunity to understand more
of what happens in Federal Way through a liaison.
Daniel Kienor, spoke in support of creating a Russian Liaison position at the city to allow the
Slavic Community to have a voice.
Lina Pastars, Federal Way business owner, spoke in support of creating a Slavic Liaison position
at the city.
Bettv Tavlor, spoke to Council asking them to create a Federal Way Community Empowerment
Coalition.
Martin Moore, spoke in support of final passage of the Campaign Contributions which is on
tonight's Consent Agenda.
Nancv Combs disagreed with the analysis done on 312 she stated it is a dangerous merge and
someone will get hurt. She also spoke against the red light cameras and strongly urged the
Council to not waste her money on a trip to Korea.
Norma Blanchard commented on the current elected Mayor race; and noted she also believes
the area on 312 is dangerous and has seen many cars racing dangerously at the merge point.
She further requested citizen input on the large development projects in the downtown.
Rov Parke, stated he believes there was a criminal conspiracy and cover-up by the city staff.
City Manager Brian Wilson thanked the Slavic Community for attending tonight and noted the
option of a new liaison position will be explored in the 2011-2012 budget cycle.
5. CONSENT AGENDA
Items listed below have been previously reviewed in their en6retybya Counci/ Committee ofthree members
and brought before full Council for approval; all items are enacted by one motion. Individual ifems may be
removed by a Councilmember for separate discussion and subsequent motion.
a. Minutes: March 2, 2010 Special and Regular Meeting APPROVED
b. Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan Adoption APPROVED
c. Bid Award: Honda Police Motorcycles-APPROVED
d. ILA between the City of Auburn, and the City of Federal Way, for the Housing o€
Inmates in the Auburn City Jail APPROVED
e. ILA between the City of Buckley, and the City of Federal Way, for the Housing of
Inmates in the Buckley City Jail APPROVED
f. ILA befinreen the City of Enumclaw, and the City of Federal Way, for the Housing
of Inmates in the Enumclaw Corrections Facility APPROVED
g. ILA between the City of Fife, and the City of Federal Way, for the Housing of
Inmates in the Fife Jail APPROVED
h. CB #528 Carry Forward Budget Adjustments APPROVED ORD/NANCE #10-649
i. CB #529 Campaign Contributions-pu//ed and approved separafely.
j. Bid Award - 2010 Asphalt Overlay Program APPROVED
k. RESOLUTION: Grant Funding for Transportation Improvement Projects —15 at S
320` Off Ramp APPROVED
I. Local Agency Agreement with WSDOT for Design of 15 at S. 320 Off Ramp-
APPROVED
. MOVED
Ciry Council Regular Meeting Minutes — March 16, 2010 Page 3 of 7
MOTION BY DEPUTY MAYOR DUCLOS TO APPROVE CONSENT ITEMS A-L AS
PRESENTED; SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER FERRELL.
Councilmember Ferrell pulled item (i) Council Bill #529/Campaign Contributions.
MAIN MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS (a)-(h); Q)—(I) WERE
APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY.
Consent Aqenda Item (i)/Council Bill #529 Campaiqn Contributions-APPROVED
ORD/NANCE #10-650
Councilmember Ferrell thanked Martin Moore for his involvement with this legislation.
COUNCILMEMBER FERRELL MOVED APPROVAL OF ITEM (i) COUNCIL BILL
#529/CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS; SECOND BY DEPUTY MAYOR DUCOLS. The
motion passed unanimously.
6. PUBLIC HEARING
a. 2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Selection Process
Mayor Kochmar read into the record the procedures to be followed and opened the public
hearing at 8:23pm.
• Staff Presentation
Senior Planner Margaret Clark gave a brief PowerPoint presentation to Council regarding the
2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendments. She noted initially staff had received 10 requests from
citizens; however seven (7) of those have since been withdrawn, leaving three (3) requests. She
reviewed each of the three (3) remaining requests and stated the Planning Commission and
LUTC have recommended to move forward on all three requests.
• Citizen Comment
Eric Pennala, spoke on behalf of Abbey Road Group and asked Council to move forward with
Site Specific Request #3 - ST Fabrication.
Patricia Larson, spoke requesting Site Specific Request #1- Lloyd/Valiani move forward.
Written Statement from Roqer Hvppa, as the adjoining property owner, he supports the Site
Specific Request #1 — LloydNaliani.
• Council Discussion/Action
Councilmembers asked various clarifying questions of Ms. Clark regarding each property.
COUNCILMEMBER FERRELL MOVED APPROVAL OF THE STAFF AND LUTC
RECOMMENDATION AS PRESENTED; SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY. The
motion passed unanimously.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes — March 16, 2010 Page 4 of 7
COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 8:44PM;
SECOND BY DEPUTY MAYOR DUCLOS. The motion passed unanimously.
b. 2010 Planning Commission Work Program (Added item - moved from 5(m)).
DEPUTY MAYOR DUCLOS MOVED APPROVAL OF THE 2010 PLANNING COMMISSION
WORK PROGRAM AS PRESENTED; SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY. The motion
passed unanimously.
7. COUNCIL BUSINESS
a. Potential Assignment of Purchase and Sale Agreement from United Properties to .
Lander Korus
Economic Development Director Patrick Doherty gave a brief background on the former AMC
Theater site. He stated the current contract with United Properties is set to expire on March 31
and further noted the Council has the authority to assign the contract to the current interested
party Lander Korus. He then introduced Mr. Suh to speak on behalf of Lander Korus.
Mr. Suh requested an extension of approximately two months at which time he stated Lander
Korus would be able to secure a 10% down payment on the project.
Councilmembers expressed concems over continually extending on this project and the
tremendous staff effort on the project to date. Council asked Mr. Suh to have documentation
showing good faith in closing this project if an extension is granted. Council concurred the current
contract expires on March 31, therefore in order to approve an extension; such documentation
would need to be presented prior to the expiration date of March 31.
Councilmember povey called the question.
COUNCILMEMBER PARK MOVED TO POSTPONE THIS ITEM AND TO HOLD A SPECIAL
CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOLLOWING THE FEDRAC MEETING ON MARCH 23 TO
DISCUSS THIS ITEM; SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY. The motion passed 6-1;
Councilmember Ferrell dissenting.
b. Committee Appointments: Northlake Management District
MAYOR KOCHMAR MOVED APPROVAL OF THE APPOINTMENTS TO THE NORTHLAKE
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT; SECOND BY DEPUTY MAYOR DUCLOS. The motion passed
unanimously.
8. INTRODUCTION / FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
a. CB#530 Proposed Text Amendment to FWRC Accessorv Dwellinq Unit (ADU)
Size Calculation, Minimum Lot Size and Housekeepinq Amendments
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to Accessory Dwelling
Units (ADU) amending FWRC 19.195.180 and 19.200.180. (Amending Ordinance Nos.
07-545, 02-424, 01-381, 97-291, and 95-245. )
Ordinance Title read into the record by Deputy City Clerk Stephanie Courtney.
DEPUTY MAYOR DUCLOS MOVED COUNCIL BILL #530 TO SECOND
READING/ENACTMENT AT THE NEXT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING; SECOND BY
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes — March 16, 2010 Page 5 of 7
COUNCILMEMBER BURBIDGE. The motion passed unanimously.
b. CB#531 Proposed Text Amendment to FWRC Appraisal Requirements
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to appraisals;
amending FWRC 16.15.010, 16.15.010(2)(g), 18.55.060(2), 19.30.080(1)(b),
19.30.090(1)(f), 19.30.100(9)(c)(ii), 19.30.120(1)(g), 19.30.120(2)(c), 19.30.130(2),
19.30.130(3), 19.30.160(2)(b), 19.30.200(1), and 19.135.030(1)(a). (Amending
Ordinance Nos. 09-595, 07-554, 06-515, 05-486, 04-468, 02-420, 02-419, 02-417, 02-
414, 01-398, 00-363, 99-357, 99-352, 98-330, 98-309, 97-307, 97-291, 95-235, 92-144,
92-135, 91-113, 90-43, and 90-41)
Ordinance Title read into the record by Deputy City Clerk Stephanie Courtney.
DEPUTY MAYOR DUCLOS MOVED COUNCIL BILL #531 TO SECOND
READING/ENACTMENT AT THE NEXT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING; SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER FREEMAN. The motion passed unanimously.
c. CB#532 Proposed Text Amendment to FW RC Short Subdivision Notice
Requiremen#s
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to short
subdivision notice requirements; amending FWRC 18.30.080. (Amending Ordinance
No. 07-554.)
Ordinance Title read into the record by Deputy City Clerk Stephanie Courtney.
DEPUTY MAYOR DUCLOS MOVED COUNCIL BILL #532 TO SECOND
READING/ENACTMENT AT THE NEXT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING; SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY. The motion passed unanimously.
9. COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Ferrell had no report this evening.
Councilmember Park reported the Korean Community Quarterly Meeting will be held on March
18 in Council Chambers at 6:30 pm. The next meeting of the Finance, Economic Development,
and Regional Affairs Committee will be held March 23` at 5:30 pm.
Councilmember Freeman encouraged citizens to support the Little Leagues.
Councilmember povey reported the SCORE facility has hired the Executive Director. He further
noted the project is currently 60 days ahead of schedule, and neighboring cities are inquiring
regarding becoming a part of the project.
Councilmember Burbidge reported the next meeting of the Parks, Recreations, Human Services
and Public Safety Committee will be April 14 at 5:30 pm in the Hylebos Room. She further
reported on her attendance at various regional meetings and highlighted upcoming community
events.
Mayar Kochmar reported on her recent visit to Washington DC where monies were requested for
multiple projects such as transportation improvements. She further reported on her trip to Arizona
where she visited the Mayor's Institute of Design to discuss downtown development.
Deputy Mayor Duclos reported on various regional meetings she attended including the Regional
Policy Committee and Pete Von Reichbauer's Good Egg forum.
City Council Regudar Meeting Minutes — March 16, 2010 . Page 6 of 7
10. CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager/Potice Chief Brian Wilson reported on his attendance atvarious regional meetings.
He noted Management Team is currently beginning to look at the 2011-2012 budget. He
reiterated comments in regards to citizen comment that any complaints or investigations brought
to the Washington State Patrol would be forwarded to the State Attorney GeneraPs Office for
review—he stated that has already happened with no charges or findings from the State Attomey
GeneraPs Office.
Chief Wilson stated there will be an Executive Session to discuss Property Acquisition and
Potential Litigation; approximate time is 30 minutes with no action anticipated.
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY TO SUSPEND COUNCIL RULES TO ALLOW THE
MEETING TO CONTINUE PAST THE HOUR OF 10:00 PM; SECOND BY DEPUTY MAYOR
DUCLOS. The motion passed unanimously.
11. EXECUTIVE SESSION
Property Acquisition Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(c)
Potential Litigation Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)
At 9:52 Mayor Kochmar adjourned to Executive Session for approximately 30 minutes.
12. ADJOURNMENT
Council retumed to Chambers at 10:33 pm
There being nothing further to come before the Federal Way City Council, Mayor Kochmar
adjourned the meeting at 10:35 pm
Attest By:
Approved On:
Stephanie Courtney, Deputy City Clerk
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes — March 16, 2010 Page 7 of 7
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: Apri16, 2010 ITEM #:
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
5usJECT: FESRUaRY ZO10 MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT
POLICY QUEST[ON Should the Council approve the February 2010 Monthly Financial Report?
COMMITTEE: Fnance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee
CATEGORY:
� Consent
❑ City Council Business
❑ Ordinance
❑ Resotution
MEET[NG DATE March 23 , 2010
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY: Tlto KTaus Finance Directo DEP'r: Finance
Attachments:
■ February 2010 Monthly Financial Report
OpNons Considered:
1. Approve the February 2010 Monthly Financial Report as presented.
2. Deny approval of the February 2010 Montlily Financial Report and provide direction to staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDAT[ON: Staf, j`�recommends approval of
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: •��_��� � �� °�
comrttittee Councii
APPROVAL: � ��1�
Commitbee Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Forward approva! of the February 2010 Monthly Financial Report to the April 6,
2010 City Council Consent Agenda.
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION "I move approval of the February 2010 Monthly Financial Report. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY C/TY CLERXS OFFICE)
COUNCIL AC'I'tON:
❑ APPROVED COUNC[L B[LL #
❑ DENIED 1� reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READ[NG (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED - 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION #
1.
Feder wa Februa 2010 Monthl Financial Re ort
Y rY Y P
GENERAL & STREET FUND OPERATIONS
The overall operations of the combined General and Street Fund showed a negative result of $438K. Overall revenue total $6.1M
and is $80K or less than 1% below year-to-date budget of $6.1M.
2009 2010 BUDGET VS ACTUAL
ENERAL 8 STREET FUND Annual YTD YTD YTD Favorable (UMavorable)
ummary of Sources 8 Usea Budget Actual Actual Budget Budget Actual i 9G
eginnirig Fund Balance $ 5,642,307 $ 5,642,307 $ 5,642,307 $ 6,942,255 $ 8,345,198 $ 8.345,198 Na N
PERATING REVENUES
roperlyTaxes 9,287,000 9,443,649 110,988 9,329,370 131,897 97.757 (34,140) -25.
ales Tax 10,578,000 10,583,302 2,061,992 10,578,000 1,984,566 1,995,665 11,099 0.6
riminal Justice Sales Tax 1,740,000 1,743,893 333,008 1,740,000 332,264 310.121 (22,143) �.7
Intergovemmental 2,424,000 2,450,957 338,834 2,386,000 329,854 364,165 34,311 10.4q
treamline Sales Tax - 3,362 - - - - - N
easehold Tax 4,000 4,999 1,346 4,000 1,077 1,157 80 7.4
ambling Taxes 1,110,000 1,127,203 158,792 1,110,000 196,668 152,891 (43,777) -22.3%
ourt Revenue 1,502,101 1,555,111 264,834 1,469,000 238,342 278,866 40,524 17.0
Building Pertnits/Fees-CD 1,245,000 1,248,470 177,551 1,251,000 173,492 136,010 (37,482) -21.6%
OW Pertnits 8 Devebp Svcs Fees-PW 341,000 355,328 41,828 349,�0 53,184 41,692 (11,493) -21.6%
icenses 240,000 250,919 50,312 240,000 48,122 46,605 (1,518) 3.2%
ranchise Fees 965,000 950,213 242,703 995,000 254,142 241,206 (12,836) -5.1�0
assport Agency Fees 73,000 68,865 13,150 73,000 13,940 10,850 (3,090) -22.2%
ark & General Recreation Fees 779,000 806,278 56,750 775,000 54,549 92,576 38,027 69.7%
olice Services 761,000 789,543 61,486 761,000 59,263 41,339 (17,924) -30.2%
dmiNCash Management Fees 628,424 628,887 105,148 641,255 107,216 106,993 (223) -0.2%
IMerest Eamings 72,250 84,437 26,000 72,250 22,247 9,170 (13,077) -58.8%
isGOther 247,789 269,168 37,748 247,000 34,639 27,947 (6,693) -19.3°/.
in I' T T n i:
Celebration Park/PK M&O 344,400 344,400 344,400 361,620 361,620 361,620 - M
Arts Comm/RW&8 Festival 113,400 113,400 113,400 119,070 119,070 119,070 n/
Police Positions 952,168 952,168 952,168 1,002,862 1,002.862 1,002,862 - N
SVeet Bond/Lights 459,486 459,486 110,465 482,461 127,906 127,906 - N
General Fund OperaUons 4,632,152 4,632,152 115,500 4,126,652 n/
Prop 1 VoterPackage 3,399,168 3,318,163 478,422 3,396,049 490,797 490,797 - nl
T f
Court/Policelfraffic 830,000 830,000 830,000 - - N
otal Operating Revenues 42,728,338 43,014,35Z 6,196,824 42,339,589 6,137,717 6,057,264 (80,453) -0.2
PERATING EXPENDITURES
ity Council 436,493 436,859 186,627 421,831 211.523 190,155 21,368 10.1%
ity Manager 1,844,694 1,762,952 275,763 1,626,822 254,470 212,323 42,146 16.6%
Municipal Court 1,505,133 1,660,809 241,420 1,505.192 243,048 223,329 19,719 g.�gy
Economic Development 488,961 354,993 41,293 321,629 46,553 38,912 7.841 16.4%
Human Resources 1,027,476 951,290 125,343 1,082,665 128,414 120,578 7,836 6.1%
Finance 970,847 898,863 155,495 993,081 171,794 148,937 22,856 13.3%
ivil/Criminal Legal Services 1,550,762 1,433,805 248,147 1,486,921 249,418 228,668 20,749 8.3°
omm. Development Svcs 4,067,399 3,770,864 543,664 3,580,064 511,332 504,599 6.733 1.3%
ail Services 2,092,463 2,043,125 119,209 2,368,041 138,167 128,846 9,321 6.7
olice Services 23,249,152 22,408,255 3,562,839 21,879,312 3,637,205 3,684,078 (46,873) -1.3%
arks and Recreation 3,875,775 3,842,171 467,878 3,860,605 561,226 492,941 68,285 12.2%
ublic Works 4,889.570 4,307.345 605,584 4,459,473 680,186 521,950 158,236 23.3%
0091-time Savings/Unalloc IS Charges (818,106) (188,106) - - Na
ofal Operating ExpendRuros 45,180,619 43,683,224 6,573,265 43,585,636 6 8,495,318 338,018 0.8
perating Revenues over/(urMer)
Operating Expenditures (2,452.281) (688.872) (376,441) (1.246,047) (695,618) (438,054) 257,565 -38.5
THER FINANCMG SOURCES
Orre-Time Trensfers In\Grant\Other 3,697,556 3,307,192 9,202 222,116 59,411 59,411 - 0.0
Interfund Loan Praceeds 65,000 65,000 65,000 - - - 0.0
Total Other Financing Sources 3,762,556 3,372,183 74,202 222,716 59,411 59A11 (7) 0.0
THER FINANCING USES
City Manager Contingency - 1.200.000 - - - �
Orre-Time Transfers\Other 10,319 429 429 462.714 - - - N
Total OUwr Financing Uses 10,319 429 429 1,662,714 0.0
otal Endf Fund Balance 6,942,2B3 S 8.345,188 S.S39,�9 E 4,z55.609 S 7,708,891 7,988,SS4 1,602,625 -23.1
DESIGNATED OPERATING FUNDS
Designated operating funds revenue total $3.4M and is $401K below year-to-date budget of $3.8M. Expenditures of $3.2M is
$134K below year-to-date budget of $33M.
2009 2010 BUDGET VS ACTUAL
DESIGNATED OPERATING FUNDS Mnual YTD YTD Y7D Favorabb U�avoraWe)
umm of Sources 8 Uses Budget Actual Aclual Budget Budget Actual S %
iegin Balance-Designated Funds $ 9,279,725 $ 9,219,725 $ 9,219,726 $ 8,680,986 $ 10,004,667 $ 10,004,667 Na N
PERATING REVENUES
Intergovemmental 527,215 513,077 75,688 537,315 79.264 83,237 3.973 5.
tllity Tax 10.636,098 10,489,908 2,104,091 10,811.614 2,134.296 1,918,738 (215.559) -10.1
UtililyTax-Prop 7 VoterPackage 3,102;196 3,059,558 579,728 3,155,239 624.355 559,632 (64.723) -10.4
HoteUAAotelLodging Tax 180,000 154,748 25,387 180.000 26.462 20,610 (5.852) -22.7
R�IEstate Exase Tax 1,175.000 1,428,985 105,109 900.000 150.322 726,960 (23,362) -15.5
FW CommunityCeMer-0perations 1,502,093 1,494,430 266,170 1,527,093 273.766 258,498 (15,268) S.6
Red LigM Photo Enfarcement Pragram 830.000 851,044 153,716 830.000 749,915 150,977 1,062 0.
ropertyTax-KCF�ansionLevy 749,205 156,187 373 757,443 303 1,045 742 244.8
mas Bay CenVe 589.132 497,811 73,270 603,786 88,868 60,209 (28,659) 32.
utzen Family Theatre 54,755 54,867 17,712 - - 12 12 N
WM Fees 3,314,114 3.397,265 38,369 3,338,969 37,710 24,268 (13.442) 35.6
efuse Collecdon Fees 270,732 272.641 45,440 278.854 46,476 49.014 2,538 5.5
Interest Eamings 149,719 55,082 15,031 152,026 41,486 4,181 (37,305) $9.
Miscellaneous/Other 4,250 4,287 10,000 - 473 473 N
Knu�enFemilyTheatre 3�,863 359,863 135,723 132.232 132.232 � 132.232 - 0.0
FVIICC Ops/Reserves/Debt 1,781,025 1.781.025 188,690 1,817,264 31.228 31,228 - 0.
Arterial SVeets 1,126,316 1,126,316 455,000 - N
otal Operatl Revenues 25,751,713 25,696.474 3,824,436 24,880.835 3,876.882 3,421.313 (385,� -1.
ERA7ING EXPEI�ITURES
'lyOverlayProgram 2,050,407 1.940,266 30,108 1,900.0� 29,483 35,611 (6,128) -20.
'lity Tax-AdmiNCash Mgmt Fee.s 62,737 62,136 10,356 64,622 70,770 10,770 0 0.
did Waste 489,233 448,872 54,996 502,404 61,555 59,468 2,087 3.4
Hotel/NbtelLodging Tax 380,895 157,062 26,032 782,500 31,450 23,427 8.023 2S.
FW Communiry Center 2.056.859 2,057,096 298,815 2.110,626 375,779 289,728 25.991 8.
raffic Safety (Red LigM Photo) 50.000 2,258 - - - - - N
�ebtService 1,203,385 1.133.287 9,112 1,203,805 9,679 9,248 431 4.5
urface Water Management 3,372.083 2,880,616 394,159 3,443,807 477,221 385.294 85.927 18.2
Dumas Bay CeMre 646.225 588,509 82,982 571.056 80,521 86.095 (5.574) �.9
utzen Family Th�tre 792,789 190,932 40,027 160.875 33.726 10.255 23,471 gg.g
ili
Parks/Arts Comm/RW&B 457,800 457,800 457,800 480,690 480,690 480,890 - 0.
FWCC Ops/Reserves/Debt 1,787,025 1.781,025 188,690 1,817.264 37.228 31,228 0.
Police Positions 952,t68 952,168 952,168 1,002,862 1,002,862 1,002,862 - 0.
Streel Band/Lighf 459,486 459.486 710,465 482.462 727,906 727,906 - 0.
Knutzen Family Theatre 35.9.863 359,863 735,723 132,232 732,232 132,232 - 0.
Arteriaf SVeets Overlay 7.126,316 7,126,376 455,000 - - - N
Trensportadon CIP 3,700,000 3,700,000 - - - - N
Gener� Fund Opaations 4,632,752 4,632,152 115,500 4,126,652 - - N
Prop 1 VMer Padcage 3,399,168 3,378,163 478,422 3,396,049 490,797 490,797 - 0.
' T
CouNPdice/Traffic 830.000 830,000 830,000 - N
otal Operating Expenditures 28,201.992 27,072.�8 3,385,356 22.862.905 3.309,839 3.175.610 134,229 0.
perating Revenues ov�l(unde�
OperaGng Expenditures (2A3�,�) (1,375,534 439.080 2.017,930 506.843 245,703 (281,140) 19.
7HER FlNANCING SWRCES
GrantslM'itigatianlOfherlTransfer 3.879,064 4,051,159 3,730,064 724,000 30,923 30,923 - 0.
Tempotary Inteifund Loan - - - - - N
Total Other Financinp Sau 3,�.�4 0.051,159 417,882 724,000 30,823 30.823 0.
THER FINANCING USES
One-TimeTransfersOuUOther 1,847.743 1,825,684 - 2,841.000 1,930,000 1,930.000 0.
IMerfund Loan RepaymenVFWCC 65,000 65,000 65,000 - - - - N
Total Other Pinaneing Uaes 7.912,743 1.890.684 65.000 2.841.000 1,930.000 1,930.000 0.
I�ING FUND BALANCE
Arterial Street 400,000 633.380 527.687 692.489 Na N
UGIityTax 7,992.461 2,131,040 5.232.822 3.819,281 2.195,520 Na N
Utility Tax -Prop 1 Voter Package 1.158.186 899,580 1,259,490 657,337 - 966.415 Na N
Solid Waste 8 Recycling 92,877 157,639 186,710 7,268 - 155.958 Na N
HoteVMotel Lodging Tax - 201,347 793,833 198.678 Na N
FW Canmunity Center 247,911 240,071 92.028 591,607 244,179 Na N
Traific Safely FurM 55.819 155,288 155,288 85,819 306,3B8 Na N
Paths 8 Trails 127,115 133,571 194.735 126.375 - 135,861 Na N
Debt Service Fund 3,884,320 4,164,480 7,863,328 2.625,550 - 2,354,095 Na N
Surface Water ManagemeM 535.875 1.114,705 21.670 508,050 - 754,07T Na N
Dumas Bey Centre Operations 182.876 149,071 (177,489) 149,359 - 723.188 n/a N
Knutzen Family Th�tre 28.648 30,616 151,911 11.27f1 - 152.608 Na N
Mal Endin Fund Balanca i 8.735.767 S 10,004,687 S 9,702,014 S 8,581,815 t S 8,281,37! n/a N
Sales Tax
Compared to year-to-date 2009 actual, sales tax revenues are down $66K or 3.2%. February sales tax collection of $1.2M is $36K
or 3.0% below 2009's February sales tax of $1.2M. Compared to 2009 year-to-date budget, sales tax revenues are up $11K or less
than 1%. There is an overall decrease in all areas of Sales tax with the exception of Construction, Other, Information, and
Government which includes Washington State agencies such as DOL, Apple Commission, and Fish & Wildlife.
LOCAL RETAIL SALES TAX REVENUES
Year-too-date Febrtwry
2009 2010 Change from 2009 2010 Actual vs
Mortth Actual Budget Acival $ 96 $ 96
Jan $ 854,156 $ 829,190 $ 824,040 $ (30,116) -3.5% $ (5,150) -0.6%
Feb 1,207,836 1,155,376 1,171,625 (36,211) -3.0% 16,249 1.3%
Mar 816,547 770,110 - - - - -
Apr 800,565 761,718 - - - -
May 874,919 903,200 - - - - -
Jun 800,518 802,507 - - - - -
Jul 829,441 819,688 - - - -
Aug 930,454 969,754 - - - - -
Sep 916,206 919,103 - - - - -
Oct 879,431 890,242 - - - -
Nov 886,309 929,316 - - - - -
Dec 786,921 827,796 - - - -
YTD Total a 2,061,992 $ 7,984,566 $ 7,995,665 3 (66,327 -3.29�0 3 11,099 0.6
nua $ 10,583,302 $ 10,578,000 n/a nla n/a Na n/a
Sales Tax bv SIC Group
Overall, there is a decrease in Retail Trade ($73K) and Manufacturing ($16K) offset by increase in Construction ($17K).
The decrease in retail trade is due to misc. store retailers ($62K), electronics/appliances ($14K) and the decrease in manufacturing
is due to wood product manufacturing ($14K).
COMPAR/SON OF SALES TAX COLLECTIONS BYS/C GROUP
Year-to-date February
Componenf Component comprised of the 2009 2010 Change fiom 2009
Group fo/low/ng major categoriex Actua/ Actual $ %
General merchandise stores, motor vehicle &
parks dealer, building materiaUgarden, and rrrsc.
Reta� Trade store reta�ers $ 1,234,553 $ 1,161,547 $ (73,006) -5.9�0
Food services/drinking places, professional,
Services scientific, tech, and repair/maintenance 418,699 416,970 (1,729) -0.4%
Construction of bu�dings and specialty trade
Construct contractors 146,469 163,791 17,322 11.89�0
Wholesale of durable goods and non durable
Wholesaling goods. 81,168 71,870 (9,298) -11.596
Transp/lRility Utdities 2,110 1,003 (1,107) -52.5%
Telecommunications, publishing and motion
hformation picture/sound record 85,941 92,070 6,129 7.1�
Wood product manufactoring, printi�g/retated
Manufacturing support, and furniture related products 38,077 22,346 (15,731) -41.3%
Economic programs, WA State liquor stores,
Government and Department of Licsensing 7,488 17,330 9,842 131.4%
RentaUleasing services, real esetate, and credit
Fm/hs/Real Estate v�termedication. 44,392 44,242 (150) -0.3�0
fukning, support activities of mining, and
Other Vansportation services. 3,095 4,497 1,401 45.3%
Annual Total $ 2,061,99Z $ 1,995,665 5 (66,327) -3.2X
Sales Tax bv Area
Comparing year-to-date 2010 to year-to-date 2009:
2010 SALES TAX BY AREA
% of Tota I
Other The
g � 50 � 0 � Commons
10.7%
S 348ih
8.9%
_ S
312th/S3161h
8.9%
� HotelMbtel Pavilion
� o Center
0 1.0 /0 6.0%
2.0 /o
■ S 348'�: Shows a decrease of $20K or 9.3% due to a
decrease in Retail AppareUAccessories ($13K) and Retail
Electronics & Appliances ($11K).
■ The Commons: Shows a decrease of $11K or 5.0% mainly
due to a decrease in General Retail Merchandise ($9K).
■ S312 to S.16"': Tax collections are down $4K or 2.0% mainly due to decrease in Retail Food Stores ($3K).
■ Pavilion Center: Tax collections show an increase of $8K or 73% mainly due to an increase in Electronics & Appliances of
$8K.
■ Hotel & Motels: Tax collections show a decrease of $SK or 20.4%.
■ Federal Way Crossings: Tax collection is down by $9K or 17.7%.
Utility Taz (Total 7.75%)
Utility taxes received year-to-date 2010 total $2.SM (includes Proposirion 1 utility tax revenues), and is below year-to-date 2009's
collections by $198K or 7.4%. Of the $198K decrease, $134K is due to a decrease in overall revenues for a major gas vendor.
Compared to budget, utilities tax revenues are below 2010 yeaz-to-date projections by $279K or 10.1%. The utility tax rebate is a
reimbursement from the City to any Federal Way resident who is at least 65 years of age or is disabled and whose income is below
the poverty level as determined by HiTD. The City issues a rebate of the tax collected by the utility provider for an amount not to
exceed 7.75% of the qualifying customer's actual urility expenses. Total # of rebates processed year-to-date was 59 totaling $8K.
ur�urr raxes
Year-to-date Febru
2009 2010 Chan e from 2008 Y009 Actual vs Bu et
Montb Actua/ Bu et Actual $ Var 96 Var 3 Var % Var
Jan $ 1,239,336 $ 1,276,825 $ 1,259,004 $ 19,667 1.6°� $ (17,821) -1.4°6
Feb 1,444,481 1,488,174 1,227,306 (2t7,175) -15.0% (260,868) -17.5%
Mar 1,382,427 1,424,244 - - -
Apr 1,224,185 1,261,215 - - - -
Nlay 1,330,817 1,371,072 - - -
Jun 1,024,160 1,055,139 - - - -
Jul 1,010,788 1,041,363 - - - -
Aug 939,252 967,663 - - - -
Sep 914,835 942,508 - - - -
Oct 1,028,231 1,059,334 - - -
Nov 987,442 1,017,311 - - - -
Dec 1,036,986 1,068,353 - - -
YTD Total ; 2,683,817 S 2,764,999 S 2,486,310 E 787,507 -7.4% : (278,689 -10.1
YTD Rebate (13,468) (6,348) (7,940) 5,527 -41% (1,592) 25%
Annual Total : 13,549,472 S 13,966,853 nla nla n/a nla nla
Compared to 2009 -
■ Electricity is down by $12K or 1.2%.
� Gas is down by $134K or 22.3% mainly due to decrease
in overall revenues for a major vendor compared to 2009.
Solid Waste is down by $3K or 2.2%. The decrease is
mainly due to the downtum in the economy, which
means reduced consumption. King County Transfer
Stations have shown a reduction in garbage tonnages of
nearly 10% compared to the prior years. Federal Way
shows a decrease of 17% reduction in overall tonnage
(garbage, yard waste, and recyclables) hauled by Waste
Management, when comparing to prior years.
■ Cable is up $3K or 1.4%.
■ Phone is down $25K or 11.6%.
■ Cellular phone down by $26K or 5.0%.
Update on Proposition 1
Year-to-date 2010 prop 1 expenditures total $491K or 15.9% of the $3.1M budget. Current life-to-date Prop 1 Utility tax
collections total $9.1M and expenditures total $8.1M resulting in ending fund balance of $968K.
Real Estate Eaccise Tax
Compazed to year-to-date 2009 actuals,
collections are up $22K or 20.8%.
February's receipt of $48K is $3K above
February 2009's actuals and $24K below
February 2010's projections. Compared to
year-to-date 2010 budget, collections are
down $23K or 15.5%.
February 2010 did not include any major
sales.
February 2010 activities include 131 real
estate transactions, of which 65 were tax
exempt.
REAL ESTATEIXCISFTAX REVENUES
Year-to-date F�roary
2009 2010 Change from 2009 T010 Actual vs Budg�
Month Actual Budget Actua/ SVar %Var $Var %Vai
Jan $ 60,134 $ 78,746 $ 79,389 $ 19,255 32.0% $ 643 0.8%
Feb 44,975 71,576 47,571 2,596 5.8% (24,005) -33.5%
Mar 93,877 87,215 - -
Apr 60,007 92,279 - -
Nlay 391,622 95,516 -
Jun 10.5,997 74,658 - -
Jul 132,852 71,843 - -
Aug 83,173 64,004 - -
Sep 122,996 88,549 - -
Oct 92,273 60,914 - - -
IVov 113,843 66,651 - -
Dec 127,237 48,049 - - - -
YTDTotai S 705,109 S 150,322 S 126,960 21,8b1 20.8% (23,362) -15.
Annual Total $1,428,985 S 900,000 nla nla n/a Na nla
HoteUMotel Lodging Tax
HoteUMotel lodging talc collections through
February total $21K. Compared to year-to-date
2009, lodging tax is $SK or 1$.8% below the
same period. Compared to year-to-date 2010
budget, lodging tax is $6K or 22.1% below
projections. In December 2009, Council
approved Lodging T� Committee budget
revision which included a downward adjustment
to revenue of $30K bringing the projected
revenues to $150K. Due to the timing of the
approval, the revision was not included in the
budget ordinance. When the revised budget is
taken into consideration, the negative variance
compazed to year-to-date 2010 budget is
adjusted to a negative variance of $1K or 6.5%.
The March report will reflect the revised budget
once the carryforward is adopted by Council.
HOTBJMOTEL LODGING TAX RE1/ENUES
Yeai-to-dats February
2008 Z010 Change irom 2009 2010 Actua/ vs Bndget
Month Actual Budget Actua! 3Var StVar ;Var SGVar
Jan $ 11,565 $ 12.647 $ 8,787 $ (2.778) -24.0% $ (3.859) -30.5%
Feb 13,822 13,815 11,823 (1,999) -14.5% (1,992) -14.4%
Mar 9,320 11,269 - - - -
Apr 12,025 10,475 - - -
May 14,597 18,215 - - -
Jun 9,910 12,483 - - - -
Jul 11,394 13.370 - - - -
Aug 13,054 18.190 - - - -
Sep 17,093 15,368 - - - -
oot �s.ass 2a.2�2 - - - -
Nov 13,285 16.741 - - - -
Dec 8,616 13.214 - - -
YTD Total S 25,387 S 26,462 s 20,610 ;(4,777) -18.8% E (5,852j -22.1
Annual Total a 154,148 S 180,000 n/a n/a Na n/a Na
Gambling Tax
Year-to-date 2010 Gambling tax collection totat $153K. In comparison to year-tadate 2009 collectioq 2010's tax collection is
$6K or 3.7% below. Compared to year-to-date 2010 budget, gambling revenues are down $44K or 223%.
GAM BLING TAX REVENUE
Year-tadate thru February
2009 2010 Change from 2009 2070 Actual vs Budget
Mo�rth Actual Budget Actual s Var � Var E Var %Var
Jan $ 78,383 $ 97,849 $ 68,015 $ (10,368) -13.2% $ (29,834) -30.5%
Feb 80,408 98,819 84,876 4,468 5.6% (13,942) -14.1%
Mar 103,463 63,713 - - - -
Apr 184,143 145,613 - -
NFay 21,780 68,688 - -
Jun 99,118 92,326 - -
Jul 107,752 93,556 -
Aug 91,449 110,930 - -
Sep 92,060 78,609 - -
Oct 87,880 83,131 - - - -
Wov 72,346 111,299 - -
Dec 108,420 65,468 - - -
YTDTotal ; 158,792 S 796,668 E 152,891 E (5,901) -3.7% E(43,777) -22.3%
Annual Total s 1,127,203 S 1,110,000 nla n/a nla Na Na
State Shared Revenue
Year-to-date 2010 distribution of $811K is above year-
to-date 2009's activity by $15K or 1.9%. The
favorable variance is due to increase all in areas with
the exceprion of Local Criminal Justice Sales T�.
' Fuel tax is included in both generaUstreet, desi�ated o peratMg Tunds, and transportatan CIP.
Permit Activity
Building, planning, and zoning pernut activities are below year-to-date 2009's activity by $42K or 23.4%. Compared to year-to-
date 2010 budget, pemut activity is down $37K or 21.6%. Community Development's has a positive expendihue variance of $7K
which is on target with projections.
BUILDING 8 LAND USE PERMITS AND FEES
Year-��ate thru Februa
2009 2010 Chan e from 2009 2010 Actual vs Bud et
Actual Budget Actuat S % S %
Jan 74,914 70,729 70,617 (4,297) -5.7% (112) -0.2%
Feb 102,637 102,763 65,393 (37,244) -36.3% (37,370) -36.4%
Mar 65,496 97,084 - - - -
pr 118.447 144,274 - - - - -
May 84,616 725,259 - - - - -
Jun 184,937 126,796 - - - -
Jul 163,050 107,883 - - - -
Aug 113,306 125,212 - - - -
Sep 80,231 76,173 - - - - -
Oct 95,358 103,133 - - - -
Nov 53,465 84,960 - - - -
Dec 112,013 86,733 - - - - -
Total 177,557 773,492 736,070 (41,541) -23.4% (37,482) -21.6%
nual Total 1,248,470 1,251,000 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Right-of-way permits and development services permit fees are down $11K or 21.6% when compared to year-to-date 2010
budget. Right-of-way permit activity and issuance is normal and the other permits such as residenrial, commercial and plats are
down due to economic conditions in the market place. We continue to reconcile some of the older projects which has generated
some addirional permit fees but this work is almost complete. Owners/developers are not proceeding with new plats since there is
a surplus of new homes, new lots, and other financial issues. This is the same for the commercial market, there is an excess of
existing office space and banks are more stringent on lending practices. The Federal Way School District has notified the City that
they will be submitting a grading permit and building permit application for the new Support Services Center in June. This project
includes the extension of 13th Avenue South, construcrion of S 332nd/333rd Street from 9th Avenue s to 13th Avenue South and
widening S 336th Street and installing a new traffic signal. This will be a significant new project for the City. Public Works
Operations expenditures total $522K and is $158K or 23.3% below year-to-date budget of $680K mainly due timing of payments.
Po[ice Department
Expenditures year-to-date through February total $3.7M and is $47K or 1.3% above the budget of $3.6M mainly due to overage
found in one-time programs in which currently do not have corresponding budget. These items, such as grants & seizures, will be
budgeted as part of the Carryfowrad Budget adjustment and will be included in the March report.
Through February, City overtime is $13K or 14.6% above last year. There is a 24.7% increase in overtime for contracted services
and traffic school. When the increase from the billable overtime is included, the total overtime increased $16K or 16.1 %. The
Overtime budget consists of $686K for City overtime, $87K for billable time, and $15K for grant overtime reimbursement. The
increase in billable rime compared to 2009 is due to the addition of the Registered Sex Offender Grant and Valley Narcotics
contriburion for 2009 which is reimburse to the City for overtime worked for related cases.
Jail Services
Jail Services year-to-date thru February is $129K and is below budget of $138K by $9K. Compared to year-to-date actuals, Jail
services are up $lOK or 8.1% compared to 2009. Through February 2010, the City has paid for services rendered through the
month of January. There is a one-month lag in jail payment. The City currently uses City of Fife, City of Enumciaw, King
County, and Yakima County for Jail Services.
Jail Services
Yeardo-date thru Februsry
2009 2Qt0 2009 vs 2010 Act 2010 &idg vs /�ct
Month Actusl Budget Actual S % 5 %
Jan 119,209 138,167 128,846 (9,636) -8.1 % 9,321 6.7%
Feb 212,224 245,973 - - - - -
Mar 147,454 170,903 - - - - -
Apr 106,812 123,798 - - - - -
May 196.999 228,327 - - - - -
Jun 182,800 211,870 - - - -
Jul 179,997 208,622 - - - - -
Aug 167,630 194,288 - - - -
Sep 182,905 211,992 - - - - -
Oct 203,436 235,788 - - - - -
Nov 159,422 184,775 - - - - -
Dec 184,238 213,537 - - - - -
YTD Total 119,209 138,16T 128,846 (9,636) -8.1 9,321 6.7
Annual Total 2,043,125 2,368,041 nla Na Na nla nla
Traffic Safety/Red Light Photo Enforcement
Traffic Safety Fund accounts for Red Light
Photo Enforcement. 2010 Year-to-date
Red Light Photo receipts are $198K, which
is received for January and February.
Payments to ATS total $47K, which is for
the month of January.
Court
Municipal Court expenditures of $223K is $20K or 8.1% below estimates. The positive variance is the Court Administrator
vacancy, which was filled in eazly Mazch 2010.
Excluding probation for year-to-date 2010 revenue is up by $11K or 4.5% compared to year-to-date 2009. When probation is
included, the increase is adjusted to $14K or 5.3%.
COURf REV9�lE
Year-to-date thru February
20� Z010 Changefrom2009 Z010ActuslvsBudget
Month Adual Budget Aetual $ Var � Var S 11�r %Var
January $ 101,503 $ 101,258 $ 111,414 $ 9,912 9.8°k $ 10,156 10.0%
February 155,225 111,026 156,7&4 1,559 1.0% 45,758 41.2%
March 152,207 119,661 - - - -
Apri 135,453 109,454 - -
AAay 122,986 118,942 - - - -
June 125,491 118,098 - - -
Juy 113,665 108,316 - - -
August 110,319 111,814 - -
Septert�ber 109,082 112,050 - - -
October 121,057 124,240 - - - -
Idovember 109.250 112,642 - - - -
December 132,323 120,5W - - - -
Subtotal E 256,728 S 212,284 S 268,198 E 77,470 4.596 5 56,975 26.
RObatiOn SICS 8,105 26,059 10,668 2,563 31.6% (15,391) -59.1%
YTDTotal ; 264,834 ; 238,542 S 278,866 5 74,033 5.3% i 40,524 17•
Annual Total 1,555,110 1,469,000 n/a n/a n/a Na n/a
Compared to year-tadate 2009 actual:
■ Traffic and non-parking fines total $175K and is $8K or
4.7% above.
■ Parking infractions total $7K and is $12K or 64.8% below.
■ DUI and other misdemeanors total $13K and is $4K or
38.0% above.
■ Criminal costs total $15K and is $3K or 19.9%.
■ Criminal Conviction Fees total $SK and is above by $2K.
Parks cY� Recreation
Overall parks operations expenditures, including administration, parks maintenance and general recreation, through February 2010
total $493K and is $68K or 12.2% below the year-to-date budget of $561K mainly due savings found in Repair/Maintenance
($19K), Professional Services ($20K), Utilities ($18K), and SalaryBenefits ($lOK) based on 2009's spending pattems.
General Recreation and Cultural Services
Direct program expenditures total $96K or 12.8% of the total annual budget of $752K not including indirect costs. Including
indirect administration costs, recreation expenditures total $139K and are 14.1% of the total annual budget of $989K. Recreation
fees total $93K and are 12% of the total annual budget of $769K. Recreation fees have recovered 96.5% of direct program costs
and is 5.8% below the annual budgeted recovery ratio of 102.3%. Considering indirect adminisiration costs, the recovery rario is
reduced to 66.4% or 11.3% below the annual budgeted recovery rario of 77.7%. General Recreation revenues projections were
increased in 2010 by $175K without a corresponding increase in expenditures. Disregarding this change, the budgeted recovery
ratio would be 60.0%, when this is taken into considerarion; their recovery ratio is above budgeted. It is expected the deparnnent
will exceed their budget but will be offset by expenditure savings within the General Fund Budget.
General Recreation revenues of $93K are $38K above year-tadate budget of $SSK. Compared to actual, general recreation is
above year-to-date 2009's acrivity of $58K by $36K. Positive variance compared to 2009 year-to-date actual is due to:
■ Adult Athtetics - There has been growth in the adult soccer leagues adding 6 new teams per season. In 2009, there was
significant snowfall and cold weather, which made the fields unplayable for several weeks which delayed the start of the
winter leagues. This yeaz much milder weather allowed us to start the winter league in January rather than March of 2009
which generated $16K additional for the beginning of 2010. There was also growth in adult volleyball leagues.
■ Youth Athletics — Girls volleyba111eague has continued to grow with 37 girls playing.
■ Senior Services — Attendance has increased from 2009 with 43 additional seniors taking trips in January and February which
generated an additional $4K compared to 2009.
■ Community Recreation — Revenues are up due to fitness programs performing strongly such as yoga and these fitness
programs have generated an additional $7K compared to 2009.
■ Recreation Inc. — Revenues are up due to classes such as cooking are doing very well. Also, increased attendance at Friday
night social club called F-DUB Club and movie outings have been popular. These events have generated an additional $2K
compared to 2009.
"Annua! revenues of $768,500 does not include $6,500 budgeted for Celebration Parks. When included, tota! budget revenues for Parks and General
Recreation total $775K, which equals the General/Street Summary page for Parks and General Recrnation budgeted revenues.
Dumas Bav Centre
Dumas Bay Centre operating revenue of $60K is below by $29K or 32.3% compared to budget of $89K. The economic
climate has resulted in a decrease in day use meetings. There were very few booked and of those the size of the groups have
been small and the smaller groups have similar costs as large groups but lower revenues. The facility has been able to secure a
large amount of overnight retreats to offset their shortfall for day use meetings. Dumas Bay Centre have also implemented
some cost saving measures to reduce our operating expenditures in repairs and maintenance, landscaping and janitorial services
and should see improvement in these areas throughout 2010 such as securing lower contracted services for room linens and
cleaning. Operaring expenditures through February total $86K, which is $6K or 6.9% above the budget of $81K. Ending fund
balance for DBC is a positive $123K, of which $70K is earmarked for marketing study and implementation. Staff continues to
work with new rentals and increasing services with existing rental groups daily.
Federal Wav Communitv Center
The Federal Way Community Center Fund was established as a special revenue fund supported by user fees and designated
Federal Wav Community Center (continued�
The operating revenue budget includes $1.SM in user fees/program revenues, $583K contribution from utility tax for
operations, $320K contribution from utility tax for reserves, and $25K use charge from General Fund Recrearion for use of
the facility. Through February, operating revenues total $258K and is $15K or 6% below year-to-date 2010 budget. In
comparison to 2010's year-to-date budget:
■ Daily Drop-in revenues are low due to conversions to Membership passes. In addition, there was a free open house on
February 27`�.
■ Pass revenues are $8K or 8.0% above year-to-date budget due to marketing effort and pass sale promotions focused on
New Year's Resolutions and first quarter activity trends.
■ Youth Athletic revenues are strong due to above average attendance for Kidz Love Soccer and Saturday Basketball
praSram•
■ Aquatic Programs are $2K or 14% below as compared to 2009, ttris is mostly due to the timing of Aquatic Fitness
Classes revenue received from Aquarobics.
■ Child care fees were less than $1K or 323% below.
■ Fitness Class revenue were $12K or 363% below as compared to high numbers from Biggest Loser '09 due to
programs being spread out a little bit more consistently throughout the year. The steady revenues should meet
projections by year-end.
■ Towel /equipment rentals aze below }�ear-to-date budget due to eliminarion of climbing geaz rental fees for Annual
Pass holders. The fee charged on the gear rentals were decreased to boost membership benefits for annual pass
holders.
■ Competirive pool rental revenues are on target with year-to-date projections. Club use is very high right now and
2010 projected actual is on pace to exceed annual projections.
■ Rental revenues are $3K or 13.0% above due to increased marketing and customer service efforts. Birthday party and
meeting rentals are performing very well.
■ Merchandise sales are slow due to most sales aze for goggles and other aquatic supplies, which sell strongly in the
summer quarter. New logo inventories will be amving in the spring and should boost sales. •
■ Concession sales have shifted to the Splash Cafe and are now included in the rental revenue category. Sales for
January & February of 2010 were the strongest since opening of the Community Center.
Through February, operating expenditures total $290K and is $26K or 8% below year-to-date 2010's budget. Federal Way
Community Center has recovered 89.2% of operating expenditures compared to the year-to-date budgeted recovery ratio of
86.7%. In comparison to year-to-date 2010's budget:
■ Personnel costs were $26K or 11.8% below due to savings in FTE wages, and cost effective service level changes.
■ Supply costs were $3K or 24.9% above budget due to first of year supply stocking, especially paper products, and
increased household supply costs from increased use of facility.
■ Other services and charges were $13K or 148.0% above due to increased in printing/photo services for the Winter
Brochures and presentarion folders for facility rentals. Both items are new in 2010 and was not previously done in
2009.
■ Urility costs were $7K or 16.9% below due to adjusted lighting, heating and HVAC schedules, aL4o mild winter
temperatures reduced heating expenses.
City's contribution of $902K for the Community Center was scheduled to annually provide $583K for
maintenance/operations and $320K for capital reserves. Through February 2010, $31K is needed to cover maintenance and
operarions.
Other Departmental Variances
Ciry Council expenditures total $190K and is under budget by $21K due timing of payments.
City Manager expenditures of $212K is under year-to-date budget by $42K mainly due City Manager vacancy.
Economic Development expenditures of $39K is below budget by $8K mainly due to timing of associarion dues compared to
2009.
Human Resources expenditures of $I21K is below budget by $8K mainly due to savings found in salaries/benefits.
Finance expenditures of $149K is below budget by $23K mainly due to savings in temp help and intergovernmental compared
to 2009's spending patterns.
Law expenditures total $229K and is $21K below budget mainly due to savings in temporary help and under spending of
outside counsel compared to 2009's spending patterns.
CASH & INVESTMENTS �
Currently all excess balances are invested in the State Investment Pool. The average portfolio yield is 0.27%, which is above
the average 6-month US Treasury Bill (0.18%).
The total invested balance at the end of February is $54.7M. The state pool is composed of Treasury Securities (32.50%),
agency coupons (0.42%), interest bearing bank deposit (4.05%), agency floating rate notes (22.22%), agency variable rate
notes (7.55%), discount notes (20.56%), certificates of deposit (0.41%), repurchase agreements (4.37%), and N.O.W accounts
(�.92%).
SIP Average Invssted Balance by Type
February �10
IB Bank � A � Y A9�Y
A9�Y �P�� � �� Variable Rate
CouP�$ 4.05% � Notes
OA2% � I �'� 7.55%
rreasury [3scourd
3ecuti�es
� �� Motes
20.56%
Repuronase � Certlricaces a
A ����� $ Accounts �P��
4 � . 7.92% 0.41%
InbBf@St R8t@8 COM�r1�D11
For the Month of February 2010
6.0%
5.0%
4.0%
3.0%
2.0%
1.0%
0.0%
• 6 Nbnth T-Bill
■ Shaee Irnestrnent Pool
O In-house Investrnent
■ Portfolio Average
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
FUND ACTIVITY SUMMARY
Beginning Fund Net Income
Fund/Fund Name Balance at 1h12010 Revenue Expenditure In/�0ut) 2/Z8J2010
Caeneral/StYeet Fund: S 8,345,198 S 6,495,046 $ 6,873,690 S 378,644) 3 7.866,554
Debt Servlce Fund: 4,164,479 128,864 1,939,249 1,81Q384 2,354,095
Special Revenue
102 Arterial SUeet 633,379 94,720 35,611 59,109 692,489
103 Utility Tax (') 3,03Q626 2,409,795 2,276,479 133,315 3,163,935
106 Solid Waste & Recycling 151,639 63,786 59,467 4,319 155,958
107 Special Cornracts/Studies Fund 271,062 300,150 300,150 571,212
109 HoteUMotel Lodging Tax 201,347 20,697 23,427 (2,730) 198,618
110 2% for the Arts 293 - 293
111 Federal Way Community CeMer 240,014 293,896 289,726 4,170 244,179
112 Traffic Safety Fund 155,288 151,078 - 151,078 306,366
119 CDBG (") _ 1,833 12,088 (10.255) (10.255)
120 Path & Trails 133,511 2,350 2,350 135,861
Sebfiota/ S" / Revenus Funds 4,817,159 3,338,305 2,696,799 641,506 5,�158,B65
Capital ProJech.
301 Downtown Redevelopment 3,051,348 1,349 33,500 (32,151) 3,019,197
302 Municipal Facilities 975,959 416 24,302 (23,885) 892,074
303 Parks 2,582,254 1,138 19,801 (18,663) 2,563,591
304 Surface Water ManagemeM 3,765,536 1,661 31,745 (30,084) 3,735,452
306 Transportation 16,384,794 44,302 372,647 328,345) 16,056,449
Subtota/ Ce ' Pro ects 26,6�8�891 48.866 481,994 433�128 26,�.763
Enterprise Funds
401 Surface Water Management 1,114,704 24,767 385,395 (360,627) 754,077
402 Dumas Bay 179,690 192,453 96,349 96,104 275,794
Subtotal Enterprise Funds 1,294,,394 217,220 481,744 264,524 1,OZ9,8T0
Internal Service Funds
501 Risk Management 5,337,573 135,433 450,436 (315,003) 5,022,570
502 Information Systems 3,015,537 362,117 310,470 51,647 3,067,184
503 Mail & Duplication 294,044 34,304 5,204 28,100 323,144
504 Fleet & Equipment 4,291,127 328,907 141,998 186,909 4,478,036
505 Buildings & Fumishings 1,204,763 90,406 38,998 51,407 1,256,170
Subtota/ IMernal Seivlce Funds 14,143,� 951,166 947,107 4,059 14,147,1Q4
Tota/ All Funds S 59,464,165 S 11,179,4� S 13 4Z0 583 S 2 241 115 S 57 50
*Utility Tax ending fund balance of $3,63,935 includes $968,415 reserved for Prop 1.
**CDBG Negative endir►g balanoe is due to tirr►ing of grant reimbursements.
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 6, 2010
ITEM #:��
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY �OUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUB.TECT: VOUCHERS
POLICY QUESTION: Should the City approve the vouchers in the total amount of $2,252,447.38
COMMITTEE: Finance, Economic Development, anci Regional Affairs Committee
CATEGORY:
� Consent
❑ Ordinance
MEETING DATE March 23 , 2010
� Public Hearing
❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY: Tho Kraus, Finance Director DEPT Finance
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the
City of Federal Way, Washington, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said liens.
C=
Finance Director
Attachments: Voucher List
Options Considered: NA
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: NA
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: c3 /9 �I//0 Q� �•A� ` 3 � �
IRECTOR APPROVAL:
Committ e Council Committee Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
of the vouchers pursuant to RCW 42.24. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1 reading
❑ TABLEDNEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION #
"I move approval of the vouchers and forward to the Apri16, 2010 Council Meeting for approval. "
City of Federal Way - Accounts Payable Check List
Bank of America Page 1 of 36
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
22610 3/15l2010 011291 JURY/WITNESS FUND, 493.89
2/25/2010 6767728 MC-03/10 REPLENISH JURY FUNDS 493.89
215810 2/17/2010 009851 MARTIN, CHRIS 325.00
2/17/2010 MARTIN 2010 PD-HAZARD. DEVICE RECERT. C MA 325.00
215811 2/18l2010 003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, 30.00
2/17l2010 10-2-04221-1 CD-MICCICHE EX-PARTE FILING FE 30.00
215812 2/26/2010 000083 AARO INC DBA THE LOCK SHOP, 330.81
2/17/2010 67549 CD-DUPLICATE KEY 6.41
1/15/2010 67017 PKM-LOCKSMITH SERVICES/DUPLICA 10.68
1/29/2010 67199 PKM-LOCK FOR NEW SAGHALIE 273.75
2/11/2010 67470 PKM-CAM LOCK FOR POLICE LOCKER 32.85
2/5/2010 67362 PWST-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 7.12
215813 2/26/2010 011322 ABELLA, C. ANGELO 100.00
2/9/2010 02/09/10 MC-INTERPRETER SVCS 100.00
215814 2/26/2010 001856 ACTION SERVICES CORPORATION, 4,232.55
1/31/2010 64880 PWST-1/2U10 STREET SWEEPING SV 4,232.55
215815 2/26/2010 000568 AGRI SHOP INC, 256.18
Z/3/2010 8470 SWM-STIHL CHAINSAW 177.34
2/3/2010 8471 SWM-CHAINS FOR SAW 78.84
215816 2/26/2010 001285 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC, 114.38
2/9/2010 TM-106145 PV1hMARKING PAINT 38.12
2/9/2010 TM-106145 PW-MARKING PAINT 76.26
215817 2/26/2070 001012 AL'S TOWING, �75,2p
1/29/2010 70536 PD-VEHICLE TOWING SVC 17520
215818 Z/26/2010 005287 AMERICALL COMMUNICATIONS &, 99.76
1/21/2010 D6417-0110 PKM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT SVC ACCO 99.76
215819 2/26/2010 A03645 AMERICAN JANITORIAL SVCS INC, 6,729.87
2/10/2010 5890 DBC-AG04-009 1/09 JNTRL SVCS-- 6,329.87
2/70/2010 5891 PKM-AG04-009:1/10 PKM JNTRL SV 400.00
215820 2/26/2010 001522 AMERICAN RED CROSS, 475.50
1/28l2010 10025253 FWCC-FIRSTAID BANDAGE KITS 475.50
215821 2/26/2010 011148 AMERICAN TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS INC, 46,960.10
1/31/2010 INV00002994 MC-1/10 RED LIGHT PHOTO 46,960.10
215822 2/26/2010 001378 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL, 1,013.04
1/22/2010 42415726 FWCC-MASTER LOCK 511.53
1/25/2010 42415902 FWCC-BRASS BODY MASTER 501.51
215823 2/26/2010 010530 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES, 110.76
2/16/2010 655-4759830 DBC-FLOOR MATS SVC 15.99
2/8l2010 655-4745198 FWCC-FLOOR MATS SVC 94.77
215824 2/26/2010 001233 AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE, 49.89
2/6/2010 030 598 3151 001 IT-LONG DISTANCE SVC 24.95
2/6/2010 030 598 3151 001 IT-LONG DISTANCE SVC 22.95
2/6/2010 030 598 3151 001 IT-LONG DiSTANCE SVC 1.99
215825 2/26/2010 010040 AUDETTE, LEONA J 131.Ofi
2l19/2010 2009 AUDETTE 2009 UTILITY TAX REBATE 131.06
215826 2/26/2010 005587 AVAYA INC,
215827 2l26/2010
215828 2/26/2010
215829 2/26/2010
2/1/2010
2/1/2010
2/1/2010
2/4/2010
2/4l2010
2/4/2010
011555 AVEDISYAN, RUBEN
2/9/2010
011&47 $AKAM, HILARIE
1/2/2010
010806 BAYSIDE EMBROIDERY,
vaizoio
2/4/2010
1/26/2010
2729693039
2729693039
2729693039
2729712328
2729712328
2729712328
02/09/10
708773
0307441
0307445
0307391
IT-1/10 PBX MAINT
IT-1/10 PBX MAINT
IT-1/10 PBX MAINT
IT-1/10 PBX MAINT
IT-1/10 PBX MAINT
IT-1/10 PBX MAINT
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
FWCC-EVENT DEPOSIT REFUND
PKM-WORK JACKET/INV#0307441
PKM-WORK COATS/INV#0307445
PKM-HOODED SWEATSHIRTS/INV#030
2,497.45
384.82
346.34
38.48
863.91
777.52
86.38
100.00
100.00
125.00
125.00
406.29
81.67
209.88
37.14
Bank of Am erica Page 2 of 36
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
2/2/2010 0307426 PKM-SCREENPRINT SAFETY VESTS/I 77.60
215830 2/26/2010 011589 BENNETT, LAUREL 1,715.00
2/18/2010 2 CM-AG10-012 WRITING SVCS 1,715.00
215831 2/26/2010 010185 BIRD, FERESIKA S 175.00
2/9/2010 02/09/10 MC-INTERPRETER SVCS 175.00
215832 2/26/2010 011919 BLUE, CARMEN I. 103.03
2/17/2010 2009 BLUE 2009 UTILITY TAX REBATE 103.03
215833 2/26/20t0 001630 BLUMENTHAI. UNIFORM CO INC, 871.35
1/22/2010 790759 PD-B HATFIELD SHOE UNIFORMS & 99.44
1/25/2010 792135 PD-R BUNK SHIRT UNIFORMS & ACC 91.38
1/26I2010 790759-80 PD-B HATFIELD SHOE UNIFORMS 8 -99.44
1/27/2010 794128 PD-S ORTA PANT UNIFORMS 8 ACCE 120.94
t/28/2010 794500 PD-M BENSEN BELT UNIFORMS & AC 64.55
1/29l2010 794778 PD-G CASTRO BOOT ALLOWANCE UNI 93.06
2/2/2010 789670-80 PD- K SMITH BOOT REl'URN UNIFOR -99.99
2/2/2010 792631 PD-M BERTUCCI BOOTS UNIFORMS 100.00
2/2/2010 795479 PD- C SIVER HOLSTER UNIFORMS & 53.60
2/3/2010 792189 PD-M HARVEY SWEATER UNIFORMS & 60.17
2/3/2010 795709 PD-E SANDERS BOOTSlSHOES UNtF 198.09
2/4/201� 796070 PD-R UNSOWRTH BOOTS UNIFORMS 157.63
2/5/2010 787683 PD-MICKELSEN HAT UNIFORMS & AC 54.70
1/25/2010 78700&80 PD- COLLAR BRASS UNIFORMS & AC -22.78
215834 2/26/2010 004919 BRATVVEAR,
PD-JUMPSUIT REPLC - HANSON
PD-UNIFORM REPAIRS S SMITH
PD-SOD UNIFORM SHIRT (BIKE) DE
PD-SOD UNIFORM SHIRT (BIKE) HA
PD-SOD UNIFORM SHIRT (BIKE} HA
PD-SOD UNIFORM SHIRT (BIKE) MO
PD-SOD UNIFORM SHIRT (B�KE) PE
PD-SOD UNIFORM SHIRT (BIKE) PR
PD-SOD UNIFORM SHIRT (BIKE) MC
PD-SOU HELMET COVERS
500.59
21.04
118.04
118.04
128.97
118.04
118.04
118.04
118.04
244.83
1,603.67
1/26/2010 316416
1/26/2010 316546
1/29l2010 316508
1/29l2010 316509
t/29/2010 316510
1/29/2010 316511
1/29/2010 316512
1/29/2010 3T6513
1/29/2010 316514
1/29/2010 316571
215835 2/26/2010 006253 BREWER, MIKE
2/25/2010 BREWER 2010
215836 2/26/2010 011920 BURR, ROBERT H.
2/11/2010 2009 BURR
215837 2/26/2010 000414 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC,
2/12l2010 19178
275838 2/26/2010 011524 CASCAD6PRINT MEDIA INC,
2/5/2010 10-27941
2/9/2010 10-27928
215839 2/26/2010 005968 CASCADE RECREATION INC,
2/3/2010 4187
215840 2/26/2010 010954 CEDAR GROVE ORGANICS RECYCLING,
1/31/2010 0000021264
215841 2/26l2010 004676 CENTERSTAGE THEATRE ARTS,
2/9/2010 FEBRUARY 9, 2010
2/9/2010 FEBRUARY 9, 2010
215842 2/26/2010 01148Q CHESAPEAKE REALTY ADVISORS LLC,
2/28/2010 FEBRUARY 2010
215843 2/26/2010 011100 CHET'S ROOFING & CONSTRUCTION,
2/23/2010 AG09-211 RETAINAGE
215844 2/26/2010 007368 CHIEF SUPPLY CORPORATION,
2/1/2010 317324
215845 2/26/2010 008799 CHRISTIE LAW GROUP, LLC,
2/5/2010 2815
215846 2/26/2010 003325 CHUGKALS INC,
2/17/2010 597398-0
2/18/2010 597398-1
215847 2/26l2010 011509 CHUNG, MASIA
2/16/2010 2009 CHUNG
SWM-BOOTALLOW. M BREVIIER
2009 UTIL�TY TAX REBATE
DBC-CATERING PLATES, PAN
CM - FW@20 POSTERS
CM - FW@20 POSTCARDS
PKM-PLAYGROUND PARTS FOR MIRRO
SWR-ORGANICS RECYCLING
PARKS-AG09-148 KFT MANAGEMENT-
PARKS-AG09-148 KFT MANAGEMENT-
CM-AG10-007 CITY CNTR CONSULTA
PARKS-AG09-211 RE-ROOF PICNIC
PD-FLASHLIGHT REPAIR PARTS
LAVwAG08-026 PSA LEGAL SVC-
DBC-EASEL PENS
DBC-PAPER EASELS
2009 UTILITY TAX REBATE
140.24
140.24
86.12
86.12
181.90
181.90
1,530.99
375.92
1,155.07
442.16
442.16
20.65
20.65
5,429.33
-404.00
5,833.33
3,283.00
3,283.00
10,800.00
10,800.00
565.62
565.62
4,803.90
4,803.90
178.87
4.80
174.07
134.85
134.85
Bank of America Page 3 of 36
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date �nvoice Description Amount Check Total
215848 2/26/2010 009356 CIS Fl1ND - CASEY JONES, 3,735.18
2/15/2010 FEBRUARY 15, 2010 PD-REPLENISH NARCOTICS CASH FU 3,735.18
215849 2/26/2010 009359 CIS FUND - KYLE SUMPTER, 428.83
2/15/2010 FEBRUARY 15, 2010 PD-REPLENISH NARCOTICS CASH FU 428.83
215850 2l26/2016 009357 CIS FUND - STAN GORDON, 223.45
2/15l2010 FEBRUARY 15, 2010 PD-REPLENISH NARCOTICS CASH FU 223.45
215851 2/26/2010 009358 CIS FUND - TOM ROBINSON, 728.21
2/15/2010 FEBRUARY 15, 2010 PD-REPLENISH NARCOTICS CASH FU 728.21
215852 2/26/2010 007443 CITIES INSURANCE ASSO OF WA, 31,790.10
2/15/2010 6400 RM-LtSE KIM DED; RM-PRK-REC- 5,000.�0
2l15l2010 6404 RM-BEAVER REMAINDER 4,000.00
2/10/2Q10 6389 RM-DENSER DED;RM-PS 22,790.10
215853 2/26l2010 004838 CITY OF ENUMCLAW, 1,320.00
2/3/2010 02914 PD-1/10 PRISONER LODGING 1,320.00
215854 2/26/2010 000951 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, 1,264.32
1/31/2010 09-1231 SWM-AG09-224 STORM LINE REPAIR 1,264.32
215855 2/26l2010 005817 CITY OF FIFE, 29,291.78
2/10/2010 0005475 PD-1/10 JAIL SVCS AG01-72 - 29,291.78
215856 2/26/2010 010959 CLARK, JERI-LYNN 500.00
1J17/2010 01-65851 REFUND PARKS-CLARK HYLEBOS DEPOSIT RE 500.00
215857 2/26/2010 003752 COASTWIDE SUPPLY DBA, 761.18
?J9/2010 T2157731 CHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 611.68
?JZ/2010 T2150497-1 PKCP-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149.50
215858 2/26/2010 001969 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY INC, 1.715.87
2/11/2010 34843 HRCK-REVISED CODE SERVICES 1,573.52
2/11/2010 34856 HRCK-REVISED CODE SERVICES 142.35
215859 2/26/2010 000721 CORLISS RESOURCES INC, 130.95
1l14/2010 232941 SWM-POTHOLE REPAIR-OVERLAY 98.59
2/3/2010 234511 PWST-320TH & 1ST PICKUP 32.36
215860 2/26/2010 011891 CROWE, BECCI 1,200.00
1/7/2010 FEBRUARY 28, 2010 PRCS-KFT "AS CLOSE AS YOU DARE 1,200.00
215861 2/26/2010 011921 CURTRIGHT, MARIE J. 113.33
2/17/2010 2009 CURTRIGHT 2009 UTILITY TAX REBATE 113.33
215862 2/26l2010 000854 D J TROPHY,
2/24/2010 228652
2/5/2010 228604
1/28/2010 228542
2/2/2010 228575
1/15/2010 228465
1/20/2010 228484
9/18/2009 227705
1/14/2010 228450
1/12/2010 228423
2/12/2010 228626
2l17/2010 228653
215863 2/26/2010 000168 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE INC,
1/27/2010 3228742
1/27/2010 3228743
1/30/2010 3228931
1/30/2010 3228932
215864 2/26/2010 004461 DESTINATION HARLEY-DAVIDSON,
Z/17/2010 990060445
215865 2/26/3010 005922 DEX MEDIA WEST,
2/6/2010 103090420
215867 2/26/2010 005341 DODD,fSCOLASTICAROSA
2/9/2010 02/09/10
215868 2/26l2010 001432 DON SMALL & SONS OIL DIST CO,
1/20/2010 440594
215869 2/26/2010 007277 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC,
1/29/2010 44630
215870 2/26/2010 000939 DS WATERS OF AMERICA, LP,
2/17/2010 021029241345236069
PRCS-SOFTBALI T SHIRTS
PD-"MOST DUI'S" PLAQUE - BASSE
FWCC-NAME BADGES
PD-2009 YEAR END AWARDS
CM/ED - PLAQUE FOR OUTGOING LT
FWCC-STAFF T-SHIRTS
PRCS-SILLY DOG SHOW TROPHY
PRCS-CHARUE PUU SHIRTS
CD/HS NAMES PLATES/PLAQUES
PRCS-VOLLEYBALL T-SHIRTS
PD-BROOKE OWEN PLAQUE
376.46
19.71
340.00
581.15
96.34
473.09
26.63
147.83
8.54
266.30
124.35
2,460.40
PRCS-RFP STLK CONCESSIONS
PRCS-RFP CP CONCESSIONS
PWST-RFP 2010 ASPHALT OVERLAY
PW-RFB S 348TH (� 1ST AVE
PD-FRNT BRAKES,ADJ CLUTCH
DBC-2N0 DIRECTORY ADS
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
MSFLT-DIESEL FUEL
PD-45 PRACTICE AMMUNITION
FWCC-WATER STOCK FOR RESALE
1,908.00
234.00
234.00
734.40
705.60
149.19
149.19
178.00
178.00
162.50
162.50
845.32
845.32
1,305.00
1,305.00
88.54
44.27
Bank of America
Check No. Date
215871 2/26l2010
215872 2/26/2010
215873 2/26/2010
215874 2/26/2010
215875 2/26/2010
215876 2/26/2010
215877 2/26/2010
215878 2/26l2010
215879 2/26/2010
Vendor tnv Date I nvoice
2/17l2010 021029241345236069
000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DBA),
2/16/2010 1073143
2/5/2010 1072963
2/9/2010 1073022
2/15/2010 1073127
1/15I2010 1072582
1/15/2010 1072582
1/15/2010 1072582
1/15/2010 1072583
1/15/2010 1072583
1/15/2010 1072583
1/16/2010 1072596
1/16/2010 1072596
1/18/2010 1072608
1/18l2010 1072608
1/18l2010 1072608
1/18/2010 1072608
1/18/2010 1072609
1/18/2010 1072609
2/1/2010 1072871
2/1/2010 1072871
2/5l2010 1072962
2/5/2010 1072962
2/5/2010 1072962
2/5/2010 1072963
010030 ECOLAB INC,
1/31/2010 1494542
011889 ENTERPRISE SECURITY LLC,
1/11/2010 60043988
002985 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,
2/10/2010 92128066
2/10/2010 92128066
2/10/2010 92128066
2/10l2010 92128066
2/10/2010 92128066
2/10/2010 92128066
2/70/2010 92128066
2/10/2010 92128066
2l10l2010 92128066
000328 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA),
2/15/2010 0327845
2/15l2010 0327845
001748 EVERSON'S ECONO-VAC INC,
1l31/2010 064757
006258 EXPRESS BUSINESS SYSTEM INC.,
2/9/2010 88013133
006645 EXPRESS TOVNNG LLC,
1/9/2010 10634 TAX DUE
2/9l2010 10729
1/9/2010 10633
000229 FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER COMMERCE,
2/9/2010 8760
2/9/2009 3035
11/18/2009 3000
2/3/2010 8755
2/3/2010 8755
2/3/2010 8755
2/3/2010 8755
2/3/2010 8755
2/3/2010 8755
2/3/2010 8755
2/3/2010 8755
Description
FWCC-WATER STOCK FOR RESALE
MSFLT-ALIGNMENT REPAIR/SVC
MSFLT-SVC A/ALIGNMENT REPAIR/S
MSFLT-TURNSIGNAL SWITCH GREDIT
MSFLT-ALIGNMENT REPAIR/SVC
MSFLT-LOF/AIR FILTER/ SHOCK AB
MSFLT-LOF/AIR FILTER/ SHOCK AB
MSFLT-LOF/AIR FILTER/ SHOCK AB
MSFLT-LOF/PACK BEAR{NGS/BALL J
MSFLT-LOF/PACK BEARINGS/BALL J
MSFIT-LOF/PACK BEARINGS/BALL J
MSFLT-LOF/OIL COOLER HOSE REPA
MSFLT-LOF/OIL COOLER HOSE REPA
MSFLT-LOF/AXEL SEAU REPACK
MSFLT-LOF/AXEL SEAV REPACK
MSFLT-LOF/AXEL SEAU REPACK
MSFLT-LOF/AXEL SEAL! REPACK
MSFLT-LOFlREPACK BEARINGS REPA
MSFLT-LOF/REPACK BEARINGS REPA
MSFIT-HINGE PIN BUSHINGS! TURN
MSFLT-HINGE PIN BUSHINGS! TURN
MSFLT�VC A/ALIGNMENT/ CLEAN &
MSFLT-SVC A/ALIGNMENT/ CLEAN &
MSFLTSVC A/ALIGNMENT! CLEAN &
MSFLT-SVC A/ALIGNMENT REPAIR/S
DBC-2/10 DISHWASHER RENT
PKM-2010 ALARM MONITORING SVC
ARCINFO CONCURRENT USE PRIMARY
ARClNFO CONCURRENT USE SECONDA
ARCCOGO FLOATING PRtMARY MAINT
ARCGIS 3D ANALYST CONCURRENT U
ARCVIEW SINGLE USE PRIMARY MAI
ARCGIS NETWORK ANALYST CONCURR
ARCPAD MAINTENANCE-
ARCGIS SERVER STANDARD WORKGRO
ARCGIS SERVER STANDARD WORKGRO
PD-2/1M0-2/15/10 FUEL FOR POL
PD-2/1/10-2/15/10 FUEL FOR POL
SWM-AGO&061 1l10 MAINT/SERVIC
IT- EXPERT FOLDER INSERTER-
RM-TOWING SVC #10.399 TAX DUE
PD-TOWING SVC CASE 10-1948
PD-VEHICLE TOWING SVC
CM - 2010 SPONORSHIP OF THE "S
CC - ECONOMIC FORECAST BREAKFA
CM - 2010 SPONSORSHIP OF CHAMB
PD - FEBRUARY CHAMBER LUNCHEON
PD - FEBRUARY CHAMBER LUNCHEON
CM - FEBRUARY CHAMBER LUNCHEON
CC - FEBRUARY CHAMBER LUNCHEON
CM/ED - FEBRUARY CHAMBER LUNCH
CD - FEBRUARY CHAMBER LUNCHEON
PD - FEBRUARY CHAMBER LUNCHEON
HR - FEBRUARY CHAMBER LUNCHEON
Page 4 of 36
Amount Check Total
44.27
3,871.52
87.12
68.99
-40.02
104.98
73.11
68.99
127.77
5823
446.71
68.97
40.61
249.74
160.38
545.75
91.86
369.1 S
50.36
122.52
240.53
694.34
53.03
114.98
26.27
47.12
202.77
202.77
296.90
296.90
10,895.25
3,285.00
2,628.00
547.50
547.50
876.00
547.50
1,095.00
273.75
1,095.00
11,092.43
10,215.99
876.44
2,885.84
2,885.84
1,600.88
1,600.88
299.06
14.88
109.30
174:88
1,825.00
750.00
175.00
500.00
20.00
80.00
40.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
Bank of America Page 5 of 36
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
2/3/2010 8755 PW - FEBRUARY CHAMBER LUNCHEON 60.00
2/3/2010 8755 PD - FEBRUARY CHAMBER LUNCHEON 20.00
2/3/2010 8755 PD - FEBRUARY CHAMBER LUNCHEON 20.00
2/3/2010 8755 PD - FEBRUARY CHAMBER LUNCF+EON 20.00
2f3/2�10 8755 PD - FEBRUARY CHAMBER LUNCHEON 20.00
2/3/2010 8755 IT- FEBRUARY CHAMBER LUNCHEON 20.00
215880 2/26/2010 004690 FEDERAL WAY NUTRITION SERVICES, 174.30
1l31/2010 2848 PD-t/10 OFFICER LUNCHES 174.30
215881 2/26l2010 008860 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA, 2,650.64
2l17/2010 1955144 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 1,476.94
2/12/2010 1945958 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 1,088.92
2/12l2010 1947409 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 84.78
215882 2/26/2010 001669 FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLC, 511.50
11123/2009 935381 LAW-AG08-038 LEGAL SVC- 511.50
215883 2/26l2010 000923 FURNEY'S NURSERY INC, 534.36
2/1/2010 I-61261 PKM-MISC PLANTS FOR CiTY HALL 534.36
215884 2/26l2010 011650 GEBREMICHAEL, MERIAM 100.00
2/9/2010 02/09/70 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 100.00
215885 Z/26/2010 004578 GENE'S TOWING tNC, 145.37
1/27l2010 359995 P0.TOWING SERVICES 145.37
215886 2/26/2010 002574 GRAHAM & DUNN, P.C., 86,285.97
2/12/2010 297541 LAV1F-SR99 HOV LANES PHASE IV- 437.50
2/12/2010 297542 LAW-SR99 HOV LANES PHASE IV- 1,705.00
2/12/2010 297543 LAW-SR99 HOV LANES PHASE IV- 560.00
2/12/2010 297544 LAVI�SR99 HOV LANES PHASE IV- 36,017.50
Z/12/2010 297545 LAW-SR99 HOV LANES PHASE IV- 12,840.99
2/12/2010 297546 LAW-SR99 HOV LANES PHASE IV- 2,502.50
2/12/201d 297547 LAW-SR99 HOV LANES PHASE IV- 726.00
2/12/2010 297548 LAW-SR99 HOV LANES PHASE IV- 770.50
2/12/2010 297549 LAW-SR99 HOV LANES PHASE IV- 625.00
2/12/2010 297550 LA1/wSR99 HOV LANES PHASE IV^ 676.49
2l15/2010 297582 LAW-SR99 HOV LANES PHASE IV- 29,424.49
215887 Z/26/2010 002547 GRAINGER INC, 248.72
1/19/2010 9162720438 FWCC BATTERY LEADS 130.29
1l19/2010 9162720438 FWCC BATTERY LEADS 27.19
1/28l2010 9170742101 FWCGCLOCK, NUTS & BOLTS 91.24
215888 2/26/2010 010738 GREEN EFFECTS, INC, 304.01
2/3l2010 29543 PARK-AG08-067 1/10 LANDSCAPING 234.24
2/3/2010 29546 PARK-AGOS-067 1/10 LANDSCAPING 69.77
215889 2/26/2010 011400 GRIFFIN, THERESA 750.00
2/9/2010 FEBRUARY 9, 2010 CM-AG09-055 CONFLICT DEFENDER- 250.00
2/9/2010 FEBRUARY 9, 2010 A CM-AG09-O55 CONFUCT DEFENDER- 250.00
2/9l2010 FEBRUARY 9, 2010 B CM-AG09-055 CONFLICT DEFENDER- 250.00
215890 2/26/2010 011907 GRIMSTAD CONSTRUCTION INC, 500.00
2/16/2010 02-70640 REFUND CD-02-70640 FW MARKET DEMO BON 500.00
215891 2/26l2010 003379 GROSSNICKLE, TRACY 175.62
2/9/2010 GROSSNICKLE 2010 PD-BAIT CAR BATTERY - WATPA GR 175.62
215892 2/26l2010 071904 HALPIN, JULIE 36:00
2/8/2010 10-100399 REFUND CD-10-100399 HALPIN REFUND 36.00
215893 2/26/2010 011848 HANLEY, JENNIFER 250.00
1/2/2010 708771 FWCC-RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 250.00
215894 2/26/2010 011913 HANNAHS, JESSE 116.00
2/10/2010 HANNAHS 2010 PWTR-PE LICENSE RENEWAL HANNAH 116.00
215895 2/26/2010 010668 HELFERS III, FREDERICK 350.00
2/10/2010 ARTHUR REGISTER PD-ASSET FORFEITURE SMN S ARTH 175.00
2/10/2010 KLINGELE REGISTER PD-ASSET FORFEITURE SMN KLINGE 175.00
215896 2/26/2010 011922 HOLCOMBE, BERTENA 121.78
2/12/2010 2009 HOLCOMBE 2009 UTILITY TAX REBATE 121.78
215897 2/26/2010 010770 HONDA, SUSAN 176.64
2/10/2010 REIMB HONDA PRCS-COSTCO - FOOD FOR ART REC 137.79
2/10/2010 REIMB HONDA PRCS-STARBUCKS - COFFEE FOR AR 26.40
2/10/2010 REIMB HONDA 'PRCS-FRED MEYER - JOURNAL FOR 12.45
Bank of America
Check No. Date Vendor inv D ate Invoice
215898 2/26/2010 009785 HOWARD, TODD
2/5/2010 91
215899 2l26/2010 000016 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS,
2/5/2010 5013502316
2/5/2010 5013502316
2!5/2010 5Q13502316
215900 2/26/2010 071863 INTELIIGENT PRODUCTS INC,
1/27l2010 107765A
215901 2/26/2010 011868 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
1/22l2010 4326
215902 2/26/2010 01�737 INTERWES'f DEVELOPMENT NW INC,
1/15/2010 64182
1/18/2Q10 64200
1/11/2010 64064
1/12/2010 64098
215903 2/26/2010 003211 IRON MOUNTAIN/SAFESITE INC,
9l30/2009 AXG9621
215904 2/26/2010 001129 J 8 K FOUNDATIONS INC,
1/3/2010 1146
215905 2/26/2010 011911 JACK E ENTER & ASSOCIATED INC,
2/16l2010 FEBRUARY 16, 2010
215906 2/26/2010 010605 JACOBSON, ELIZABETH
2/19/2010 JANUARY 2010
215907 2/26/2010 009388 JEN INC,
1/29/2010 19904
215908 2/26/2010 010814 JENSEN, KAREN
2/18l2010 2009 JENSEN
215909 Z/26/2010 011923 JONES, CAROL L.°
2/19/2010 2009 JONES
215910 Z/26/2010 OT1474 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES,
2/4/2010 J658976
2/3/2010 0424333
215911 2/26/2010 002679 KANG, SAI C
1l27l2010 01l27/10
215912 2/26/2010 011906 KELLER, SHIREEN
2/10/2010 724434
215913 2/26/2010 010681 KENT, HELENE
2/18/2010 2009 KENT
215914 2/26/2010 010653 KERNS, SALLY
2l78/2010 2009 KERNS
215915 2l26/2010 011737 KIMMEL ATHLETIC SUPPLY CO. INC,
1/29l2010 0282315-IN
215916 2/26/2010 000125 KING COUNTYfINANCE DIVISION,
2/19/2010 KC-ALGONA
215918 2/26/2010 008328 KING COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH,
2/2/2010 7030013
215919 2/26/2010 003898 KING COUNTY RADIO,
12/9/2009 00420565
12/9/2009 00420876
215920 2/26/2010 011584 KOMPAN INC,
2/5l2010 INV66822
215921 2/26/2010 011888 KRUBALLY, SAUL
2/2/2010 02/02/10
215922 2/26/2010 Ot1924 KUZUBOVA, VERA
2/17/2010 2009 KUZUBOVA
215923 2/26/2010 000096 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT,
2/8/2010 5592
215924 2l26/2010 OT1908 LARSEN SIGN CO.,
1/21/2010 11412
215925 2/26/2010 010098 LEADSONLINE LLC,
2/1/2010 216222
Description
CM-AG09-003 CONFLICT DEFENDER
IT-2/10 AlL FAX MAINT
IT-2/10 ALL FAX MAINT
IT-2/10 ALL FAX MAINT
PKM-MUTT MITTS PLUS
PKM-TREE PRUNING THUNDERING OA
PKM-ROCK 1 MAN BLUE ALGONA 8 Q
PKM-MINUS FRANKLIN GRAVEUINV#
PKM-ROCK 1 MAN BLUE ALGONA & M
PKM-QUARRY SPALLS & ROCK 1 MAN
HRCK-09/09 RECORDS STORAGE SVC
PRCS-RELOCATE ARTWORK FROM STL
PD-LEADERSHIP RETREAT FAC�LITA
PRCS-BALLROOM DANCE CLASSES-
CM/ED - ADVERTISIN IN JAPANESE
2009 UTILITY TAX REBATE
2009 UTILITY TAX REBATE
FWCC-DOUBLE ROLL BALL BEARINGS
FWCC-DOUBLE ROLL BALL BEARING
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
FWCC-REFUND OCT 09 PAYMENT
2009 UTILITY TAX REBATE
2009 UTIIITY TAX REBATE
PRCS-WHISTLES & LANYARD
PWST-1/10 ALGONA TS-SOL�D WAST
CC-4TH QTR 09 LIQUOR EXCISE TA
IT-PD-RADIO MAINT/REPAIR
9T-PD-RADIO MAINT/REPAIR
PKM-PARTS FOR WEDGEWOOD PARK
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
2009 UTILITY TAX REBATE
PWST-SV LINE ABAND 35454 PAC H
PD-VINYL LETTERING, STRIPE, RO
PD-LEADSONLINE 2010 RENEWAL
Page 6 of 36
Amount Check Total
250.00
250.00
152.13
7.61
76.07
68.45
2,013.91
2,013.91
848.63
848.63
474.42
141.32
37.05
224.45
71.60
2,596.45
2,596.45
1.704.58
1,704:58
2,979.20
2,979.20
1,504.80
1,504.80
800.00
aoo.00
108.61
108.61
49.70
49.70
286.52
237.19
49.33
100.00
100.00
56.47
56.47
243.79
243.79
148.82
148.82
72.15
72.15
58.88
58.88
4,728.55
4,728.55
693.74
583.59
110.15
681.97
681.97
100.00
100.00
58.17
58.17
662.95
662.95
311.51
311.51
6,348.00
6,348.00
B a n k of America
Check No. Date Vendor Inv D ate Invoice
215926 2/26/2Q10 004052 LEED,
2/4l2010 02151002
1/25/2010 02021003
215927 2/26/2010 010706 LEONARD, KIMBERLY
12/29/2009 2009 LEONARD
215928 2/26/2010 003157 LES SCHWAB TIRE CTRS OF WA INC,
2/8/2010 435229
215929 2/26l2010 011909 LEXISNEXIS RISK,
1131/2010 1470204-20100131
215936 2/26/2010 011827 LIU-JOHNSTQN, RUTH ANN
1!8l2010 C0 101 71 642
215931 2/26/2010 000630 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC,
1/29/2010 137439
t/12l2010 137099
1/29/2010 137439
1 f 15/2010 137313
1/26/2010 137322
1/2612010 137322
215932 2/26l2010 005339 LOWE'S HIW INC,
1/29l2010 02036
1l28/2010 14431
2/4/2010 D2713
2/8/2070 14975
2/5/2010 02812
2/4/2010 14034
1/11/2010 02144
1/12/2010 01320
1/15l2010 14366
1/14/2010 02457
1/14l2010 02464
1/14/2010 14152
1/20/2010 14518
2/2/2010 11618
2/4/2010 14046
2/4/2010 14046
2/4/2010 14046
2/5/2010 02863
2/5/2010 02864
1/14/2010 02464
2/12/2010 02332
2/9/2010 01361
215933 2/26l2010 011925 LYNN, JANET
2/17/2010 2009 LYNN
215934 2/26/2010 001004 MAILMED�A DBA IMMEDIA,
2/23l2010 59502PA
215935 2/26/2010 005406 MAYBERRY, MITCHEL
2/17/2010 WINTER 2010
215936 2/26/2010 011900 MCCANDLESS, TINA
Z/5/2010 722412
215937 2/26/2010 010043 MCDONALD, ELOISE I.
2/19l2010 2009 MCDONALD
215938 2/26/2010 004182 MCDONOUGH & SONS INC,
2/10/2010 167509
215939 2/26/2010 001675 MCDOUGAL, MARY
2/16/2010 MCDOUGAL 2010
215940 2/26/2010 006008 MCLOUGHLIN & EARDLEY CORP,
1/26l2010 0105801-IN
215941 2/26/2010 010256 MCMASTER-CARR,
1/28/2010 46128020
1/29/2010 46250713
215942 2/26/2010 011905 MENDOZA, MIGUEL
2l10l2010 724435
Description
PD-FOX EARPHONE
PD-SOD UNIFORM EARPIECE
MSC-2009 UTILITY TAX REBATE
PWFLT-TIRE REPAIR
PD-LEXISNEXIS 1/10 USER FEE
SWR-RECYCLING IMAGES
SWM-298TH @ STH SINKHOLE REPAI
PKFAC-DBC STAIRS MATL
SWM-298TH @ 5TH SfNKHOLE REPAI
PKFAC-DBC BARK CHIPS
PWSTlSWM-ASPHALT MIX
PWST/SWM-ASPHAIT MIX
PKM-PLIERS, PLIERS, TOOLS
PKCP-TOILET TISSUE ROLLERS
PKM-PAINT - GREEN HOUSE STLK
CHB-GRND COVER PLANTS
PKM-DURAWOX 8 BUNGEES
PKFAC-NUTS/BOLTS JOIST HANGERS
PKFACK-GRN LOAD 100 CT
PKFAC-CONCRETE DBC STAIRS
PKFAC-MICRO ALLEGEN
PKFAC-5 GAL BUCKET DBC STAIRS,
PKFAC-RECIP BLADE - DBC STAIRS
PKFAC-CLOTHS, MAGLITE
PKFAC-ADAPTERS
DBC-HEX BOLTS, GREY WHL W BRAK
FWCC-BATTERIES, PLUGS, HEX NUT
FWCC-BATTERIES. PLUGS, HEX NUT
FWCC-BATTERIES, PLUGS, HEX NUT
PWST-CARTRIQGE FUSE
FWCC-WHITE MELAMI, HEX SHEET M
PKFAC-RECIP BLADE - DBC STAIRS
CHB-PD LOCKER REPAIR PARTS
CHB-TRACK HOSE REEL
2009 UTILITY TAX REBATE
PRCS-NCOA WINTER NEWStETTER PO
PRCS-AG09-161 MARTIAL ARTS CLA
PRCS-CLASS FEE REFUND
2009 UTILITY TAX REBATE
PARKS-AG06027-PARKING LOT CLE
HR-FW@20 CELEBRATION SUPPLIES
PD-REPAIR BULBS
FWCC-THIN WALL TREADED INSERT
FWCGFAUCET WASHER, ARM LATCH
FWCC-RENTAL CANCELLED REFUND
Page 7 of 36
Amount Check Total
73.04
43.04
30.OQ
102.12
102.12
46.40
46.40
470.85
470.85
45.00
45.00
1,818.19
0.03
83.34
121.33
1,494.68
26.82
91.99
1,316.65
76.64
17.43
32.63
144.10
42.46
72.71
12.65
193.38
21.87
237.40
13.50
58.58
5.03
45.11
39.25
38.82
49.19
7.60
36.67
107.86
9.04
54.73
142.72
142.72
832.92
832.92
960.00
960.00
6.00
6.00
104.13
104.13
105.88
105.88
151.40
151.40
352.98
352.98
156.00
57.78
98.22
1,'125.00
625.00
Bank of America Page 8 of 36
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
2f10/2010 724435 FWCC-RENTAL CANCELLED REFUND 500.00
215943 2/26/2010 005176 MERINO STRAWE, BETTY 150.00
2/9/2010 02/09/10 MC-INTERPRETER SVCS 150.00
215944 2/26/2010 011787 MICHELS CORPORATION, 26,424.24
1/31/2010 09-1231 SWM-AG09-224 STORM LINE REPAIR 27,688.56
1l31/2010 09-1231 SWM-AG09-224 STORM LINE REPAIR -1,264.32
215945 2/26/2010 011918 NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT, 137 ��
1/13/2010 525280 PD-FINGERPRINT SUPPLIES 137.04
215946 2/26/2010 004445 NATIONAL SAFETY INC, 1,243.05
1/28/2010 0266412-IN PKM-EAR MUFFS/SAFETY GLOVES FO 500.00
1/28/2010 0266412-IN PKM-EAR MUFFS/SAFETY GLOVES FO 743.05
215947 2/26/2010 011862 NATURE'S FOOTPRINT INC, 1,670.00
2/5/2010 24380 SWR-WORM BINS 1,670.00
215948 2/26/2010 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPANY, 834.47
1l28/2010 243723 PKCP-MISC SCREWS/BOLTS 23.60
2/1/2010 243794 PKM-RODENT CONTROL BOX $•37
2!1/2010 243798 PKFAC-SCREWS/BOLTS 36.70
2/1/2010 243811 PKM-DURASHARP SCISSORS, TOOLS 15.69
2/1/2010 243814 PKFAC-STR. CONN SCREWS ITYLEBOS 27.57
?JS/2010 243938 PWST-LUMBER/LINER ��
2/9/2010 244001 PKFAC-DECKING PLANKS 488.30
2/8/2010 243958 PKM-LIGHTBUIBS 4 •��
2l10f2010 244040 PKM-WHITE CHIP BRUSHES 47.33
1l12/2010 243295 DBC-LUMBER DBC STAIRS 137•97
215949 Z/26/2010 005493 NORTHWEST EMBROIDERY INC, �
2/9/2010 61285 PD-PSSA UNIFORM SHIRT 46.74
1/26/2010 61118 PD-PSSA UNIFORM SHIRT 161.65
1/28/2010 61284 PD-PSSA UNIFORMS 57.45
215950 2/26/2010 004292 OLYMPIC SECURITY SERVICES INC, 2,409.20
1/31/2010 SI+0023200 MC-AG09-162 COURT SECUR�TY- 2,409.20
215951 2/26/2010 007444 ORCA PACIFIC INC, 649.62
1/28/2010 042547 FWCC-AG09-020 POOL CHEMICALS M 649.62
215952 2/26l2010 009920 OSAKA GARDEN SERVICE, INC, 1,584.63
2/1/2010 26058 PWST-AG07-010 ROW LANDSCAPE MA 1,584.63
215953 2/26/2010 011805 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION, 1,888.52
2/25/2010 AB4217 22 IT-AG09-230 1/70 PRINTER/COPI 18:89
2/25/2010 AB4217 22 �T-AG09-230 1/10 PRINTER/COPI 18.89
2/25/2010 AB4217 22 IT-AG09-230 1/10 PRINTER/COPI 113.31
2/25/2010 A64217 22 IT-AG09-230 1l10 PRINTER/COPI 75.54
2/25/2010 A64217 22 IT-AG09-230 1/10 PRINTERlCOPI 396.59
2J25/2010 AB4217 22 IT-AG09-230 1l10 PRINTER/COPI 245.51
2/25/2010 A64217 22 IT-AG09-230 1l10 PRINTER/COPI 396.59
2/25l2010 AB4217 22 IT-AG09-230 1/10 PRINTER/COPI 207.74
2/25/201� AB4217 22 IT-AG09-230 1l10 PRINTER/COPI 18.89
2/25/2010 AB4217 22 IT-AG09-230 1/10 PRINTER/COPI 396.57
215954 2/26l2010 006440 PAPE MACHINERY INC, 435.85
2l4/2010 2510507 PWFLT-PERIODIC MAINT SRV 435.85
215955 2/26/2010 001814 PARAMETRIX INC, 21,71128
1/20/2010 0411194 PWST-AGO&219 348TH INTERSECTI 21,711.28
215956 2/26/2010 000855 PARKER PAINT MANUFACTURING CO, 58.43
2/9/2010 022001388 CDB-PAINT SUPPLIES 58.43
215957 2/26/2010 008063 PARLOG, NANCY L 75:86
2/18/2010 2009 PARLONG 2009 UTILITY TAX REBATE 75.86
215958 2/26/2010 010580 PETTY CASH - CM, 338.43
2/12/2010 CM-02/12/10 CM - COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING 5.23
2/12/2010 CM-02/12/10 CC - JACK DOVEY MILEAGE REIMBU 27.94
2/12/2010 CM-02/12/10 JT- DBC CAMERA SUPPLIES 26.05
2/12/2010 CM-02/12/10 IT- CCN REPAIR SUPPLIES 17•81
2/12/2010 CM-02/12/10 IT- CCN REPAIR SUPPLIES �7•$2
2l12/2010 CM-02/12/10 PW-LUTCREFRESHMENTS 6.69
2/12/2010 CM-02/12/10 CM - BUSINESS LUNCH WITH LAW A 38.48
2/12/2010 CM-02/12/10 CM/ED - LILLIAN YEH MILEAGE 23.20
Bank of America
Check No. Date
215959 2/26/2010
215960 2/26/2010
215961 2/26/2010
215962 2/26/2010
215963 2/26/2010
215964 2/26/2010
215965 2/26/2010
215966 2l26l2010
215967 2/26l2010
215968 2/26/2010
Vendor Inv Date Invoi
2/12/2010 CM-02/12/10
2/12/2010 CM-02/12/10
2/12/2010 CM-02/12J10
2/12/20'10 CM-02/12/10
2/12/2010 CM-02/12/10
2/12l2010 CM-02/12/10
001166 PETTY CASH - FWCC,
2/23/2010 fWCG2l23/10
2/23/2010 FWCG2/23/10
2/23/2010 FWCC-2l23/10
2/23/2010 FWCG2/23l10
2/23/2010 FWCC-2/23l10
2/23/2010 FWCC-2/23/10
2/23/2010 F�/VCG2/23/10
2/23/2010 FWCC-2/23/10
2/23/2010 FWCC-2/23110
2/23/2010 FWCC-2/23/10
2/23/2010 FWCC-2/23/10
2/23/2010 FWCC-2l23l10
2/23/2010 FWCC-2/23/10
2/23/2010 FWCG2/23/10
0�6241 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT,
2/18/2010 PD-02/18N0
2/18/2010 PD-02/18/10
2/18/2010 PD-02l18/1�
2/18/2010 PD-02/18/1�
2/18l2010 PD-02/18/10
2l18/2010 PD-02118/10
2/18/2010 PD-02/18l10
2/18/2010 PD-02/18/10
2/18/2010 PD-02/18/10
2l18/2010 PD-02/18/10
2/18/2010 PD-02/18/10
2/18/2010 PD-02/18/10
2/18/2010 PD-02/18l10
2/18/2010 PD-02/18/10
2l18/2010 PD-02/18/10
2/18/2010 PD-02/18/10
011901 PICARDO, NICK
2/10l2010 724433
2/10/2010 724436
000697 pIERCE COUNTY BUDGET 8 FINANCE,
Z/8/2QT0 AR105771
003537 PIERCE COUNTY SECURITY INC,
2/8/2010 205223
2/8/2010 205225
2/8/2010 205274
2/8/2010 205279
2/8/2010 205340
2/8/2010 205076
2/8/2010 205132
2/8/2010 205179
000808 'PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY,
2/11/2010 7337595
011890 .POPICH, STACY
2/17/2010 RM STACY POPICH RMPS
005583 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC,
1/20l2010 35402580
001095 PRIMA - WASHINGTON CHAPTER,
2/11/2010 2010 PRIMA
-010845 PRIORITY PRINT MANAGEMENT INC,
1l29/2010 27380-1
1/29/2010 27380-2
Description
CM/ED - LILLIAN YEH TOURISM DA
CC - LINDA KOCHMAR MILEAGE REI
CC - LINDA KOCHMAR MEAL REIMBU
CM - NATALIE REES FW@20 POSTER
FIN - THO KRAUS AND PHUNG HUYN
FIN - HEIDI HORTQN PSFOA REGIS
PRCS - BREAD FOR VALENTINE DAN
PRCS-BROWN SUGAR FOR VALENTINE
PRCS-TABLECLOTHS FOR VALENTINE
PRCS-SNACKS FOR CULTURES AND C
PRCS-CRAFTS FOR CULTURES AND C
PRCS-SNACKS FOR CULTURES AND C
PRCS-PAINT FOR CULTURES AND CR
PRCS-ITEMS FOR DROP IN CLASS C
PRCS - FOOD FOR CULTURES AND C
PRCS-ART SUPPLIES FOR CULTURES
PRCS-LUNCH INN AT PORT MADLOCK
PRCS-TACOMA NARROW BRIDGE TOLL
PRCS- "S" HOOKS FOR ART GALLER
PRCS-MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
PD-CELL PHONE CHARGER-
PD-TOLL CHARGE -
PD-PARKING FEES FOR SEATTLE-
PD-CANDY FOR BACK SEAT-
PD-BIKE SHORTS REQUIRED FOR-
PD-AWARD CERTIFICATE FOLDERS-
PD-REPLACEMENT OF IGNITION-
PD-ANNUAL CLOTHING ALLOWANCE F
PD-PLATES, SPOONS, ETC. FOR-
PD-BREAKFAST ITEMS FOR-
PD-CRASH CONFERENCE TUITION-
PD-FUEL FOR DEPARTMENT-
PD-ANNUAL CLOTHING ALLOWANCE-
PD-PARKING FEES FOR SEATTLE-
PD-COFFEE FOR VOLUNTEER-
PD-COFFEE FOR LEADERSHIP-
PRCS-COURSE CANCELLED-REFUND
PRCS-FIRST AID COURSE CANCELLE
PD-LEADERSHIP WORKSHOP-C,REGORY
PARKS-SECURITY 5/1/06 - 5J1/07
PARKS-SECURITY 5/1/06 - 5/1l07
PARKS-SECURITY 5/1/06- 5/1/07
PARKS-SECURITY 5/1/06 - 5/1l07
PARKS-SECURITY 5/1/06 - 5/1/07
PARKS-SECURITY 5!1/06 - 5/1/07
PARKS-SECURITY 5/1/O6 - 5/1/07
PARKS-SECURITY 5/1/06 - 5/1/07
CH&ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
RISK-RM STACY POPICH; RMPS
PKM-OXYGEN FOR FIELD
RM- 2010 PRIMA WA DUES
SWM-THE LAKE VIEW NEWSLETTER (
SWM-THE LAKE VIEW NEWSLETTER (
Page 9 of 36
Amount Check Tota�
25.00
43.87
14.27
43.69
23.38
25.00
289.65
10.00
1.89
9.82
6.78
60.82
15.44
29.07
21.42
18.78
6.80
79.92
4.00
9.02
15.89
21.89
4.00
19.00
10.88
54.75
8.75
97.82
94.03
13.60
43.39
25.00
25.01
67.00
9.00
83.40
26.40
603.92
150.00
5.00
145.00
45.00
45.00
1,425.00
250.00
150.00
175.00
150.00
150.00
150.00
250.00
150.00
90.34
90.34
50.00
50.00
16.21
16.21
125.00
125.00
252.95
701.07
151.88
Bank of America Page 10 of 36
Check No. Date Vendor inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
215969 2/26/2010 009960 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT, 4,403.59
2/5/2010 79819 PD-EXTEND. WARRANTY FOR TASERS 810.08
1/26/2010 79112 PD-TASERS-JAG GRAND 3,593.51
215970 2/26/2010 009363 PRO-TOW MAPLE VALLEY, 304.08
2/9l2010 104176 PD-VEHICLE TOW - CASE 10-1795 304.08
215971 2/26l2010 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC, 15,296.62
2/17/2010 004-919-1000 SWM-1/10 2101 324TH STORAGE EL 51.12
2/17/2010 250-275-0389 PWTR-t/10 106 SW CAMPUS DR- 160.55
2/8/201Q 131-066-1002 PWTR-1/10 NON METERED ELECT 15,084.95
215972 2/26I2010 008649 QUAUTY WATER SERVICES, 2�.3z
1/31/2010 68206 DBC-WRTER COOLER RENTAL 27.32
215973 2/26/2010 007837 QUARTERMASTER, 2�•49
, 2/5/2010 P654090901016 PD-HAT PATCHES 2�-49
215974 2l26/2010 011926 QUON, MICHAEL 109 •`' 4
2/18/2010 2009 QUON 2009 UTILITY TAX REBATE 109.54
215975 2/26/2010 000202 QWEST, 2,240.74
2/4/2010 206-Z040609 4726 IT-PHONE/DATA SVC 1,120.37
2!4/2010 206-Z040609 472B IT-PHONE/DATA SVC 1,008.33
2/4/2010 206-Z040609 472B IT-PHONE/DATA SVC 112.04
215976 2/26/2010 010703 REALCHEM NORTHWEST, 587.59
2/1/2010 5939 FWCC-REALCHEM & WATER TEST. SV 587.59
215977 2/26J2010 001299 REPROGRAPH�CS NORTHWEST, 2,455.83
1l29/2010 03-379626 SWAA-STOP WORK CARDS 141.67
1f27/2010 03-379205 PWST-2070 ASPHALT OVERLAY BID 627.38
1l27/2010 03-379206 PWST-S 348TH SPEC BOOKS 1,686.78
215978 2/26/2010 011097 SAFE CITY FEDERAL WAY, 37,500.00
2/10l2010 2347 MIS-AGOS-122 SAFE CITY PROGRAM 37,500.00
215979 2/26/2010 010975 SAFECHECKS, 672.70
1/29/2010 0512660 FI-A!P CHECK STOCK 672.70
215980 2/26/2010 011764 SBS LEASING PROG. OF DE LAGE, 109.92
2/6/2010 4933206 IT-2/10 CD COPIER RPR, MNT, SU 1�9.92
215981 2/26/2010 011899 SEALY, KIRSTIN 60.00
2/2/2010 721256 PRCS-CLASS CANCELLED REFUND 60.00
215982 2/26/2010 OU3832 SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, 4,787.65
2/2/2010 P1102972 PD-CRIME STOPPERS ASSESSMENT 4,787.65
215983 2l26/2010 010351 SEATTLE SPORTS COMMISSION, 5,000.00
1/27/2010 SSC-2010 CM/ED - ONE-YR. PARTNERSHIP 20 5,000.00
215984 2l26l2010 001213 SECOMA FENCE INC, 410.63
1l29/2010 7771 PKM-FULL WEIGHT POST FOR DUMAS 410.63
215985 2/26/2010 001480 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO, 35.91
1l22/2010 2129-3 PKM-PAINT SUPPLIES 35.91
215986 ?126/2010 002501 SHOPE CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO INC, 263.96
1/18/2010 9920198 PKM-TYPE 1 6" RISER/INV#992019 263.96
215987 2/26/2010 001014 SKCSRA-SOCCER REFEREES ASSOC, 1,460.00
2/2/2010 FEBRUARY 2, 2010 PRCS-SOCCER REFEREE SERVICES 1,460.00
215988 2/26/2010 006291 SMITH FIRE SYSTEMS, 227.36
1/22/2010 SSG2010 DBC-KFT SPRINKLER HEAD REPAIR 227.36
215989 2/26l2010 011810 SMITH, DILLON 1,000.00
2/1/2010 1 CM-CONFLICT DEFENDER SVCS 750.00
2/10/2010 2 CM-CONFLICT DEFENDER SVCS 250.00
215990 Z/26/2010 009939 SMITH, KELLY 199.88
2/17/2010 SMITH 2O10 PD-SWAT EQUIP DUMP POUCHES 199.88
215991 2/26/2010 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 1,234.35
1/30/2010 319447 PWST-RFB 2010 ASPHALT OVERLAY 513.36
1/30/2010 321845 PWST-RFB S 348TH @ 1ST AVE 224.95
1/23/2010 319448 PWST-RFB S 348TH � 1ST AVE 248.02
1l13/2010 315512 SWR-2010 SOLID WASTE RATES NOT 248.02
215992 2/26/2010 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 275.00
1/31/2010 259473 SWR-1/6l10 WEB BANNER 275.00
215993 2/26/2010 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 367.04
1/20/2010 317933 PRCS-REP - FOOD CONCESSIONS 167.28
1/27/2010 317943 PRCS-REP - FOOD CONCESSIONS 199.76
Bank of America
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice
215994 2/26/2010 004963 SOUND PUBL�SHING INC,
1/23/2010 319452
1!9/2010 315500
1/30/2010 321853
215995 2/26/2010 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC,
1l23/2010 319450
215996 2/26/2010 001885 SPARKS CAR CARE,
2/1l2010 25378'
2/4/2010 25405
2/8/2010 25413
2/5/2010 25402
2/5/2010 25402
2/12/2010 25440
2/12/2010 25440
2l12/2010 25440
2/12l2010 25441
Z/9/2010 25421
2/15/2010 25446
2J15l2010 25446
2/15/2010 25446
2/17/2010 25464
215997 2/26/2010 007186 SPECIALINTERESTTOWING,
2!6/2010 133877
215998 2/26l2010 009426 SPORTS CONNECTION, LLC,
2l17/2010 1�159
215999 2/26/2070 011917 SPRECHER, DENYCE
2l18/2010 728207
216000 2/26/2Q10 004701 SPR�NT,
1/28/2010 400102318-098
1/28/2010 400102318-098
216001 2/26/2010 000872 STAR LAKE GREENHOUSE INC,
2!3/2010 6043
2/9/2010 6044
216002 2/26/2010 011356 STRATEGIES 360, INC,
Z/2/2010 772-2536
2/2l2010 772-2536
2/2/2010 772-2536
216003 2/26/2010 000308 SUBURBAN CITIES ASSOCIATION,
10/30/2009 1506
216004 2/26/2010 D03896 SUMMIT LAW GROUP,
2/12l2010 45194
216005 2/26/2010 009238 SUMNER LAWN N SAW,
1/22l2010 157747
1/6/2010 157388
216006 2/26/2010 007710 SUPERIOR LINEN SERVICE,
2!8/2010 42919
2/15/2010 44915
216007 2/26/2010 007990 SYMBOLARTS LLC,
2/8/2010 0123984-IN .
216008 2/26/2010 009523 SYSTEMS FOR PUBLiC SAFETY,
2/18/2010 13530
2/17/2010 13526
2/17/2010 13546
2l12/2010 13494
2/12/2010 13495
2/12/2010 13504
2/9/2010 13469
2/9/2010 13470
2/9/2010 13477
2/9/2010 13479
2/11/2010 13478
2/11/2010 13503
2/15/2010 13527
Description
CD-NOTICE OF MASTER PLAN USE
CDPL-LAND USE LEGAL NOTICE
CD-NOTICE OF INTERPRETATION
PD-RFQ MOTORCYCLES
PD-INV#25378 UNDERPAtD $1.00
PD-LOFlAIR FILTER FLT REPAIR/S
PD-LOF FLT REPAIR/SVC
PD-REPLC COOLANT FAN MODULE/MO
PD-REPLC COOLANT FAN MODULE/MO
PD-LOF/MOUNT TIRFJIMPER BLADE!
PD-LOFlMOUNT TIRENNPER BLADE/
PD-LOF/MOUNT TIRENNPER BLADE/
PD-LOF FLT REPAIR/SVC
PD-BATTERYlCIRCUIT BRAKER FLT
PD-"C" SVC/MOUNT TIRE FLT REPA
PD-"C" SVClMOUNT TIRE FLT REPA
PD-"C" SVC/AAOUNT TIRE FLT REPA
PD-LOF FLT REPAIR/SVC
PD-VEHICLE TOVNNG SVC
PD-EXPLORER SHIRTS, BIB APRONS
PRCS-PICNIC DEPOSIT REFUND
IT-1/10 CELLULAR AIRTIME
IT-1/10 CELLULAR AIRTIME
PKM-PLANTS FOR CITY HALUINV#6
PKM-PLANTS FOR CITY HALUINV#6
CM-AG09-048 2/10 FEDERAL LOBBY
CM-AG09-048 2/10 FEDERAL LOBBY
CM-AG09-048 2/10 FEDERAL LOBBY
CC-9l16/09 SCA NETWORKING DINN
LAW-AGOS-028 LEGAL SVC - EMPLO
PKM-EXMARK MOWER REPAIR
PKM-GATOR MAINT/REPAIR
DBC-LINEN SERVICE
DBGLINEN SERVICE
PD-EXPLORER COINS
PD-INSTALL ALTERNATOR
PD-COLO AIR INTAKE, INSTALL PL
PD-SWAP VRM ANTENNA
PD-BRAKE PADS & ROTORS
PD-BRAKES & ROTORS, fLUID
PD-INSTALL RECEIVER HITCHES
PD-ROTORS AND BRAKE PADS
PD-RO70RS & PADS, OLF
PD-HEADLIGHT, OLF
PD-REPLC BATTERY
PD-SWAP BRtCK & HEAD UNIT
PD-REPLC HEADLIGHTHULB
PD-SWAP OUT VRM
Page 11 of 36
Amount Check Total
364.84
184.58
97.34
82.92
66.33
66.33
1,616.77
1.00
46.41
36.08
778.70
56.94
77.42
56.94
8.76
34.99
198.43
21.90
32.85
231.37
34.98
175.20
175.20
1,181.53
1,181.53
100.00
100.00
6,001.71
2,880.82
3,120.89
341.98
169.76
172.22
5,038.92
5,038:92
5,038.92
-5,038.92
172.00
172.00
108.00
108.00
1,171.85
62t.85
550.00
60.10
30.05
30.05
1,530.00
1,530.00
6,669.12
679.86
704.78
43.16
396.64
528.52
346.70
663.11
357.52
84.68
137.45
129.46
37.70
43.16
B ank of America
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description
2/16l2010 13489 PD-R & I STRUT ASSY, TIRE, RIM
2/16/2010 13522 PD-BRAKES, WEATHER STRIPING, A
2/16/2010 13525 PD-AIR BAG WARNING JEWEL
2/5/2010 1343$ PD-INSTALL K9 SYSTEM, SWAP DOO
2/5/2010 13447 PD-INSTALL SECTOR PRINTER
2/5/2010 13456 PD-CVPI BATTERY
216009 2/26/2010 007756 TAB PRODUCTS CO LLC,
1l29/2010 1886962 PW-ALPHA CLSF FILES, LABELS
1l29/2010 1886962 PW-ALPHA CLSF FILES, LABELS
1/29/2010 1886962 PW-ALPHA CLSF FILES, LABELS
1/29I2010 1886962 PW-ALPHA CLSF FILES, LABELS
1/29/2010 1886962 PW-ALPHA CLSF FILES, LABELS
1/29/2010 1886962 PW-ALPHA CLSF FILES, LABELS
1l19/2010 1882657 PD-12/09 BOX STORAGE
216010 2/26/2U10 007292 TACOMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE,
2/9/2010 HERNANDEZ REGISTER PD-LEADERSHIP CONF. HERNANDEZ
2/10/2010 OVERLEASE REGISTER PD-LEADERSHIP CONF. OVERLEASE
216011 2/26/2010 002176 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC,
2/3/2010 13853452 FWCC-SCREWS, WASHERS,NUTS
216012 2/26/2010 006033 THE FAB SHOP ILC,
2/9/2010 15219 PWFLT-REPLC BRAKES & AXLES
2/16/2010 15227 PWFLT-AXLE SEAL 8 HUB CAP ORIN
216013 2/26/2010 003088 THE PART WORKS fNC,
2/10/2010 276917 CHB-TRAP PRIMER
2/3/2010 276363 PKM-FACILITY REPAIR SUPPLIES/M
216014 2/26/2010 001424 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR INC,
2/1/2010 410105 FWCC-ELEVATOR MAINT SVCS
216015 Z/26/2010 009919 TITUSWILL COLLISION CENTER,
11/18/2009 51090 RM-OFF UNSWORTH-PS6172;RM-PS;
216016 2/26l2010 008902 TRI-CITY MEATS,
2/5/2010 231746 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
2/12/2010 231932 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
2/17/2010 232023 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
Z117/2010 232025 DBGCATERING SUPPUES
216017 2/26/2010 005549 TRINH, JAMES
2/2/2010 02/02/10 MGINTERPRETER SVCS
216018 2/26/2010 003572 TUCKER, CURTIS
2l18/2010 TUCKER 2010 PD-LASERTAG fQUIP. EXPLORER CH
216019 2/26/2010 002426 UNITED GROCERS CASH 8 CARRY,
2/2/2010 135460 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
2/3/2010 135691 DBC-CATERING SUPPLtES
2l4/2010 135950 PRCS-COOKING CLASS SUPPLIES
2/5/2�10 136258 DBGCATERING SUPPUES
2/5/2010 136259 PRCS-COOKING CLASS SUPPLIES
1/28/2010 134107 PRCS-COOKING CLASS SUPPLIES
2/13/2010 138532 DBGCATERING SUPPLIES
2/14/2010 138955 DBGCATERING SUPPLIES
2/6l2010 136750 DBGCATERING SUPPLIES
2/11/2010 138154 PRCS-FDUB VALENTINE DANCE
2l12/2010 138353 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
2/12/2010 138428 PRCS-FDUB VALENTINE DANCE
216020 2/26/2010 003837 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE,
2/6/2010 OOOOF6588V060 PD-DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICE
2/13/2010 OOOOF6588V070 PD-DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICE
216021 2/26/2010 010489 UNITED STATES POST OFFICE,
2/9/2010 1697 SWM-RECYCLING EVENT BROCHURE
216022 2/26/2010 011806 UNIVERSAL REFRIGERATION INC,
12/28/2009 551056 FWCC-REFRIGERATOR REPAIR
216023 2l26/2010 005715 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS,
2/2/2010 T61638388 IT-2/10 PAGER IEASE
2/2/2010 T61638386 1T-2/10 PAGER LEASE
216024 2/26/2010 011351 VANDERVEER, JEFFERY
Page 12 of 36
Amount Check Total
738.38
566.69
68.32
431.52
466.30
245.17
531.69
9.61
12.81
3.20
12.81
16.01
9.61
467.64
140.00
70.00
70.00
9.80
9.80
1,723.03
772.12
950.91
136.96
92.18
44.78
681.55
681.55
1,952.41
1,952.41
757.66
261.79
255.70
127.37
112.80
100.00
100.00
780.00
780.00
721.34
87.12
42.52
41.09
65.13
33.47
32.39
79.50
11.05
45.38
170.45
97.34
15.90
27.17
25.82
1.35
5,282.00
5,282.00
502.02
502A2
50.24
26.13
24.11
500.00
Bank o America
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice
2/'IS/2010 VANDERVEER 2010
216025 2/26/2010 009277 WA STATE DEPT OF AGRICULTURE,
2/17/2010 60855
216026 2/26l2010 005139 WA STATE DEPT OF RETIREMENT,
2/1/2010 785475
2(1/2010 785475
216027 2/26/2010 000340 WA STATE INFORMATION SERVICES,
1/31l2010 2010040177
1131/2010 2010010177
1l31/2010 2010010177
216028 2/26/2010 000854 WA STATE PATROL,
2/2/2010 110005554
216029 7J26l2010 006876 WA STATE POLICE CANINE ASSOC,
2/17/2010 ORTA 2010 RENEWAL
216030 2/26/2010 002717 WASHINGTON FIRM LTD, THE
, 1l31l2010 110041
216031 2/26/201� 011021 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT,
2/16/2010 1-14420
216032 2/26l2010 011894 WASPC,
12l24/2009 1007
216033 2/26/2010 010537 WASTEQUIP MFG. CO.,
2/1/2010 37200542
216034 2126/2Q10 009995 WATER MANAGEMENT,
2/1/2010 87885
216035 2/26l2010 008314 WESSEL, TOM
2/18l2010 WESSEL 2010
216036 2/26/2010 003444 WEST CAMPUS CLEANERS,
2l11/2010 JANUARY 2010
2/11/2010 JANUARY 2010
216037 2/26/2010 011394 WEST GOVERNMENT SERVICES,
1/31/2010 AB0002061714
216038 Z/26/2010 000541 WESTERN EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS,
2/4/2010 621219.2
2/3/2010 621346
216039 2/26/2010 010057 WHISTLE WORKWEAR,
1/26l2010 53346
216040 Z/26/2010 011523 WHOLESALE SPORTS,
12/31/2009 0150-43712/31/09
1/4l2010 0150-4921/4/10
1/7/2010 01072010 #2
216041 2/26/2010 005680 WILD WEST INTERNATtONAL LLC,
'I/31/2010 5840
216042 2/26l201� 005722 YAKIMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF,
2/10/2010 JANUARY 2010
216043 2/26/2010 011881 YAVAPAI FIREARMS ACADEMY, LTD,
2/5/2010 HOWELL TRNG
216044 2/26/2010 009325 YEH, LIlLIAN
2/12/2010 YEH 2O10
216045 3/2/2010 003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT,
3/1/2010 09-2-36751-5 KNT #38
216046 3/3/2010 000119 WMCA-WA MUNICIPAL CLERKS ASSOC,
3/3/2010 MCNEILLY REGISTER
216047 3/412010 008989 HOWELL, ADAM
2/17/2010 HOWELL 2070
216048 3/4/2010 003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT,
3/3/2010 09-2-32161-2 KNT 17
216049 3/4/2010 003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT,
3/3/2010 09-2-38424-0 KNT 08
216050 3/9/2010 009968 CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC,
3/9/2010 MARCH 9, 2009
216051 3/15/2010 009161 A-1 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC.,
Description
PD-CLOTHING ALLOW. VANDERVEER
PWST-BRIAN LYBECK 2010 PESTICI
PW-RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION-MAR
PW-RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION-MAR
IT-1/10 SCAN SERVICE
IT-1/10 SCAN SERVICE
IT-1/10 SCAN SERVICE
PD-FEB 2010 CPL REMITTANCE
PD-WSPCA 2010 DUES ORTA
HR-EXECUTIVE COACHING SVC
SWR-TWIN LK PARK/RIDE LEASE
PD-EXPLORERS REGISTRATION
SWR-RECYCLING CONTAINER LIDS
SWM-LABORATORY TESTING SERVICE
PWST-DIGITAL CAMERA
PD-AG07-135 DRY CLEANING SVCS-
PD-AG07-135 DRY CLEANING SVCS-
PD-1/10 CLEAR CONTRACT CHGS
PWFLT-SHAFT-ROLLER
PWFLT-REPLC STEERING UJOING
PWST-WORK CLOTHING FOR AARON B
SWM-CLOTHING FOR ERIC FOX
SWAA-CARHART CLOTHING FOR RON S
SWM-CLOTHING FOR MIKE SWENSON
PD-1/10 RIFLE RANGE FEES
PD-1/10 JAII SVCS AG00-167-
PD-A HOWELL LE SHOTGUN INSTRUC
CM-FEB 2010 MILEAGE - L YEH
PWST-0421049040 MAZATLAN PROP
HRCK-V1�MA CONF. MCNEILLY
PD-SHOTGUN INSTRUCT. TRNG HOWE
PWST-0921049106 HOLZ
PWST-785360-0240 GQIDEN PROP.
PWST-LEASE EARLY TERMINATION
Page 13 of 36
Amount Check Total
500.00
33.00
33.00
126.91
123.09
3.82
913.57
401.97
456.79
54.81
1,039.50
1,039.50
35.00
35.00
703.13
703.13
400.00
400.00
410.00
410.00
2,784.05
2,784.05
137.00
137.00
109.49
109.49
918.32
885.47
32.85
84.70
84.70
728.62
31.38
697:24
559.58
559.58
802.26
468.63
127.49
' 206.14
139.90
139.90
98,233.88
98,233.88
550.00
550.00
80.65
80.65
9,290.00
9,290.00
350.00
350.00
175.00
175.00
374,010.00
374,010.00
115,010.00
115,010.00
259,000.00
259,000.00
2,836.06
Bank of America Page 14 of 36
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
1/18/2010 �94149F FWCGFIRE EXTWGUISHER MAINT. 2,241.47
1/20/2010 195036 FWCC-12 VOIT BATTERIES FIRE SY 594.59
2'16052 3/15/2010 000083 AARO iNC DBA THE LOCK SHOP, 83.77
2/11/2010 67430 SWR-SPARE LOCKS FOR RECYCLE BI 83.77
216053 3/15/2010 000332 ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS INC, 216.20
2/3l2010 6075735 CDB-ABC LEGAL MESSANGER-MICCIC � 8720
2l28/2010 20273581 LAW; MNTHLY SRV CHARGE; MARCH 62.50
2/28/2010 20273551 LAW; MNTHLY SRV CHARGE; MARCH 62.50
2/28/2010 20273581 LAW; BULK CHARGE; 09-2-38424-0 4.00
216054 3lt5/2010 011322 ABELLA, C. ANGELO 100.00
2/16l2010 02/16/10 MC-INTERPRETER SVCS 100.00
216055 3/15l2010 001856 ACTION SERVICES CORPORATION, 4,232.55
?J28/2010 65138 PWST-02110 STREET SWEEPING SVC 4,232.55
216056 3115/2010 000109 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL, 45.53
2/10l2010 74333 PKM-MASTER PADLOCK KEYS/INV#14 45.53
216057 3/15/2010 000568 AGRI SHOP INC, 114.57
2/18/2010 8678 PWST-ZYNTH. 2 STROKE OIL 26.00
2/11/2010 8578/1 PKM-CONTROL HANDLE FOR SMALL 55.57
2/18/2010 8678 PWST-ZYNTH. 2 STROKE OIL 33.00
216058 3l15/2010 0�5225 AIRGAS - NOR PAC INC, 2,297.58
2/11/2010 101326677 PKM-HAND SANITIZER DISPENSERS/ 2,297.58
216059 3l15/2010 000475 ALARM CENTERS/CUSTOM SECURITY, 270.00
2/22l2010 687009 PKCP-3l10-5/10 ALRM MNTR-BLDG 120.00
2/22/2010 687011 PKM-3/10-5/10 ALRM MNTR STLK H 75.00
2/22/2010 687012 PKM-3/10-5/10 ALRM MNTR STLK H 75.00
216060 3/15/2010 009764 ALL ACCESS PRINTING & MAILING, 210.39
2/11/2010 18363 HR-BUSINESS CARDS 210.39
216061 3/15/2010 001110 AMAYA ELECTRIC, 721•11
2118/2010 8283-2 PKKFT-LIGHT FIXTURES, BALLASTS 721.11
216062 3/15/2010 005287 AMERICALL COMMUNICATIONS &, 325.91
2/21l2010 D6416-0210 SWM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT SVC COST 58.48
2/21/2010 D6416-0210 SWM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT SVC COST 58.47
2/21/2010 D6417-0210 PKM-AfTER HR CALL-OUT SVC ACCO 208.96
216063 3/15/2010 003269 AMERICAN HOTEI REGISTER CO, 93.63
2/23/2010 1447105 DBGINSPECTION KITS 8 LIGHT ST 93.63
216064 3/15/2010 010530 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES, 94.77
2/22l2010 655-4769118 fWCGFLOOR MATS SVC 94•77
216065 3l15/2010 011912 ATLANTIC SIGNAL LLC, 5,880.00
2/11/2010 7944 PD-SWAT RADIO COMMUNICATIONS E 5,850.00
2/11/2010 7944 Freight 30.00
216066 3/15/2010 005587 AVAYA INC,
3/1l2010 2729799158
3/1/2010 2729799158
3/1/2010 2729799158
216067 3/15/2010 008057 BALESTRERI, MARINA
2/23/2010 2009 BALESTRERI
216068 3/15/2010 001604 BALL, GIGI Y
2/19/2010 02/19l10
216069 3H5/2010 001790 BARGREEN ELLINGSON INC,
12/28/2009 5959451
216070 3/15t2010 011944 BATTERY POWER II/BATERY MART,
2/25/2010 127759
216071 3/15/2010 010806 BAYSIDE EMBROIDERY,
1/29/2010 0307414
2/2/2010 0307427
2/22/2010 0307516
216072 3/15/2010 004238 BEACON BALLFtELDS,
2/9/2010 0400459-IN
2/9/2010 0400459-IN
216073 3l15/2010 011945 BILLINGS, FRED R.
3/4/2010 2009 BILLINGS
216074 3/15/2010 010185 BIRD, FERESIKA S
IT-02/10 PBX MAINT
IT-02/10 PBX MAINT
�T-02/10 PBX MAINT
CM-2009 UTILITY TAX
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
FWCC-DISSOLVE DESCALING SOLVEN
PD-TROJAN BATTERY
SWM-CLOTHING
SWM-PRINTING AND EMBROIDERY
PKM-STAFF UNIFORMS/INV#0307516
PKM-DIG-OUT TOOLS, PITCHER RUB
PKM-DIG-OUT TOOLS, PITCHER
CM-2009 UTILITY TAX
769.64
384.82
346.34
38.48
71.81
71.81
100.00
100.00
246.38
246.38
205.43
205.43
657.95
328.01
32.35
297.59
1,302.6U
502.60
800.00
98.85
98.85
200.00
Bank of America Page 15 of 36
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
2/23/2010 02/23/10 MC-INTERPRETER SVCS 100.00
2/16l2010 02/16/10 MC-INTERPRETER SVCS 100.00
216075 3/15/2010 001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC, 1,064.31
2/10/2010 797070 PD-SANT- BOOT ALLOWANCE 100.00
2/19/2010 793826 PD-HATS UNIFORM STOCK ROOM DRE 164.09
2l19/2010 797480 PD-BUCHANAN-BOOTALLOWANCE 120.44
2/19/2010 797651 PD-KRASNOVID- PSSA UNIFORM EVI 65.68
2/19/2010 797740 PD-HWANG, UNIFORM REPLACEMENT 271.77
12/15/2009 782719 PD-WALSH- BOOT ALLOWANCE 100.00
2/t 112010 794118 PD-MATTSON BOOT ALLOWANCE 200.00
2/16/2010 798090 PD-FORRESTER- BOOT ALLOWANCE 91.93
2/17/2010 79�323-01 PD-NEAL, S FASTENERS 10.40
216076 3/15/2010 011866 BONIFIELD, SANDRA 100.00
2/19/2010 02/19/10 MC-INTERPRETER SVCS 100.00
216077 3l15/2010 011288 BOWMAN, JASON 3,074.75
2/3/2010 JANUARY 2U10 FWCC-AG09-015 PERSONAL TRAINER 119.35
3/?J2010 FEBRUARY 2010 FWCGAG09-015 PERSONAL TRAINER 2,955.40
216078 3/15/2010 004919 BRATWEAR, 2,772.14
Z/24l2010 316621 PD-BIKE UNIFORM-ADAMS 1,144.38
2/24/2010 316622 PD-BIKEUNIFORM-S.SMITH 1,144.38
2/18/2010 316638 PD-JUMPSUIT REPLCMNT - SCHULZ 462.34
2/18/2010 316812 PD-JUMPSUIT REPAIR - RIGGLES 21.04
216079 3/15/2010 008203 BROUWERS, JEANNETTE 128.63
2/23/2010 2009 BROUWERS CM-2009 UTILITY TAX 128.63
216080 3/15/2010 011359 C.A.T. DESIGN, 250.00
3/1/2010 CFW2010-001 CM/ED - GRAPHIC DES�GN SERVICE 250.00
216081 3/15/2010 011282 CALKINS, NICHOLE 1,269.00
3!1l2010 FEBRUARY 2010 FVVCC-AG09-16 PERSONAL TRNG SVC 1,269.00
216082 3l15/2010 000991 CASCADE COFFEE INC, 313.08
1/28/2010 30602618 PRCS-COFFEE SUPPLIES 198.60
2/11/2010 20601689 HR-COFFEE SUPPLIES 114.48
216083 3l15/2010 011524 CASCADE PRINT MEDIA INC, 698.23
2/26/2010 10-28098 CM -INFO - PRINTING OF PROGRAM 698.23
216084 3/15/2010 A05968 CASCADE RECREATION INC, 1,730.54
2/19/2010 4213 PKM-PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT REPAI 1,130.54
216085 3/15/2010 D71081 CASE POWER & EQUIPMENT, 102.06
2/9/2010 F51959 SWM-EQUIPMENT SERVICE 102.06
216086 3/15/2010 D05573 CDW GOVERNMENT INC, 14,513.27
2/24/2010 RVL1331 IT/PD - PHASE 1 ITRONIX LAPTOP 11,486.01
2/24/2010 RVL1331 IT/PD - PHASE I LAPTOP ADD-ON- 890.67
2/24/2010 RVL1331 IT/PD - PHASE I ITRONIX VEHICL 1,714.79
2l24/2010 RVL1331 ITlPD - PHASE I ITRONIX VEHCIL 224.70
2/24/2010 RVL1331 IT/PD - PHASE I ITRONIX DV0.RW 197.10
216087 3/15/2010 011328 CECCANTIINC, 40,76075
3/5/2010 AG09-035 #9 PWST-AG09-035 S 356TH INTERSEC 42,906.05
3/5/2010 AG09-035 #9 PWST-AG09-035 S 356TH INTERSEC -2,145.30
216088 3l15/3010 004359 CENTURY SQUARE SELF-STORAGE, 1,293.50
3/6/2010 8220 PRCS-F019 2/10-8/10 STORAGE RE 1,293.50
216089 3l15/2010 011100 CHET'S ROOFING 8 CONSTRUCTION, 16,223.75
3N0/2010 AGOS-212 RETAINAGE PARKS-AG09-212 RETAINAGE-CHET 16,223J5
216090 3/15/2010 010650 CHOI, EDWARD 201.49
2/24/2010 2009 CHOI CM-2009 UTILITY TAX 201.49
216091 3/15/2010 004712 CHRIS LEAVITT PHOTOGRAPHY, 1,104:86
2/24/2010 b0978 CM - INFO - PORTRAIT OF JUDGE 97.45
2/24/2010 50978 CM -iNFO - NEW PORTRAITS OF C 570.50
2/11/2010 50958 CM - INFO - PHOTO REPRODUCTION 436.91
216092 3/15/2010 003752 COASTIMDE SUPPLY DBA, 2,785.36
2/23/2010 T2162686 DBC-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 322.08
2/9l2010 W2157657 FWCC-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 2,463.28
216093 3/15/2010 011329 COLUMBIA BANK, 2,145.30
3/5l2010 AG09-035 #9 PWST-AG09-035 S 356TH INTERSEC 2,145.30
3/5/2010 AG09-035 #9 PWST-AG09-035 S 356TH INTERSEC 3,145.30
Bank o America
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Da Invoice
3/5/2010 AG09-035 #9
216094 3/15/2010 007591 COMMERCIAL SPACE ONLINE WC,
3!1/2010 73630
216095 3/15/2010 008445 COPIERS NORTHWEST INC,
2/24/2010 I"NV339309
2/18/2010 I NV337508
2/19/2010 INV337930
216096 3/15/2010 000721 CORLISS RESOURCES INC,
2l17/2010 235490
2/10/2010 234998
2/8/2010 234844
216097 3l15/2010 000771 COSTCO/HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS,
2/26/2010 FEBRUARY 2010
2/26l2010 FEBRUARY 2010
2/26/2010 FEBRUARY 2Q10
2/26/2010 FEBRUARY 2010
2/26l2010 FEBRUARY 2010
2/26/2010 FEBRUARY 2010
2/26/2010 FEBRUARY 2010
2/26/2010 FEBRUARY 2010
2/26/2010 FEBRUARY 2010
216098 3/15/2010 011931 COVINGTON QUILTERS,
2/2412010 11562
216099 3/15/2010 011137 CULBERTSON SIGN,
2/23/2010 BL REFUND
2/23/2010 BL REFUND
216100 3/15/2010 006792 CUMMINS NORTHWEST,
2/11/2010 001-17133
2/11/2010 001-17135
2/11/2010 001-17136
2/12/2010 001-17287
216102 3/15/2010 010015 CUTHBERT, GAIL
3/1/2010 FEBRUARY 2010
216103 3/15/2010 000854 D J TROPHY,
2/5/2010 228710
2/3/2010 228582
216104 3/15l2010 011113 DAUGHERTY, JAMES C
2/13/2010 FEBRUARY 13, 2010
2/22/2010 GRNTISTU 22, 2010
216105 3/15/2010 008835 DAY, MARIANNE
2/23/2010 2009 DAY
216106 3/15/2010 011943 DEFENSE SOLUTIONS GROUP INC,
1/13/2010 76169
216107 3/15/2010 011878 DELAUDER, JASON
2/12/2010 1715
2l12/2010 1716
216108 3/15/2010 000438 DELI SMITH 8 CHOCOLATE JONES,
2/17/2010 543382
216109 3/15/2010 000578 DETAIL PLUS,
2/26/2010 FEBRUARY 26, 2010
216110 3l15l2010 005922 DEX MEDIA WEST,
2/23/2010 640474119
216111 3/15/2010 008039 DMX MUSIC,
3/1/2010 A406416
216112 3/15/2010 005341 DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA
3/2/2010 03/02/10
2/23/2010 02/23/10
2/19/2010 02/19/10
2/16/2010 02/16/10
216113 3l15/2010 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DBA),
3/2/2010 1073390
2/24/2010 1073293
Description
PWST-AG09-035 S 356TH INTERSEC
CM/ED-03/10 PROPERTY DATABASE
IT-02/10 CN12764-01 COPIER USA
IT-02/10 CN12713-01 COPIER USA
IT-02/10 CN12852-01 COPIER USA
SWM-CONCRETE SUPPLIES
PWST-THE YARD CORIISS PICK UP
PWST-CONCRETE SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
FWCC/PRCS-SPRfNGBREAK CAMP, MA
FWCClPRCS-SPRINGBREAK CAMP, MA
FWCClPRCS-SPRINGBREAK CAMP, MA
PD-FIRST AID SUPPLIES, BATTERI
PRCS-0AUGHTER'S NIGHT OUT SUPP
PRCS-DAUGHTER'S N�GHT OUT SUPP
HR-MGT ACADEMY TRNG SUPPLIES
HRCK-COUNCIL DINNER 02/16l10
DBC-REFUND OVERPAYMENT
FI- REFUND FOR DOUBIE PAYMENT
FI- REFUND FOR DOUBLE PAYMENT
PARKS-AG09-22a GENERATOR SVC-
PARKS-AG09-220 GENERATOR SVC-
PARKS-AGO&220 GENERATOR SVC-
PARKS-AG09-220 GENERATOR SVC-
FWCC-AG07-085 FITNESS TRAINING
MC-JUDGE ROBERTS NAME PLATE
FWCC-BIGGEST LOSER T SHIRTS
CMI-CONFLICT DEFENDER SVCS-
CM-CONFLICT DEFENDER SVCS-
CM-2009 UTILITY TAX
PD-SWAT FIREARM ACCESSORIES
SWR-RECYCLING BIN COUPON FLYER
SWR-PRINTING OF COMMERCIAL SIT
CM - DEPOSITION LUNCHES FOR CI
PD-VEHiCLE DETAIL SVC
DBC-02/10 DIRECTORY ADS
IT-03/10 ALL DIGITAL MUSIC
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
MGINTERPRETER SVCS
PD-ALIGNMENT
PWFLT-TIRES
Page 16 of 36
Amount Check Total
-2,145.30
100.00
100.00
242.65
42.78
37.73
162.14
1,419.96
344.27
533.88
541.81
1,458.29
378.77
178.17
49.49
186.62
418.86
53.44
65.45
55.96
72.53
65.29
65.29
55.00
50.00
5.00
1,623.77
368.10
419.68
419.68
416.31
1,227.40
1,227.40
266.45
10.00
256.45
500.00
250.00
250.00
184.00
184.00
603.34
603.34
433.62
98.55
335.07
31.18
31.18
131.40
131.40
371.35
371.35
61.14
61.14
550.00
175.00
100.00
175.00
100.00
1,828.00
90.47
548.22
Bank of America Page 17 of 36
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
2l27/2010 1073338 PWFLT-LOF 47.34
2/27/2010 1073338 PWFLT-ENGINE WORK 80.06
2/27/2010 1073341 PWFLT-LOF 54.12
2/25/2010 1073299 PWFLT-ELECTR�CAL WORK 96.45
2/25/2010 1073299 P WF LT-BATTERY 131.28
3/5/2010 1073434 PWFLT-CREDIT- SUPPLY CHARGES F -2.43
3!5/2010 1073435 PWFLT^CREDIT- SUPPLY CHARGES F -1.06
3/5l2010 1073436 PWFLT-CREDIT-SUPPLY CHARGES FR -2.75
2/19/2010 1073194 PWFLT-CREDIT-FOR PARTS OVER CH -7.36
2/19/2010 1073195 PWFLT-CREDIT-FOR PARTS OVER CH -23.05
2/19/2010 1073196 PWFLT-CREDIT-FOR PARTS OVER CH -17.36
2/19/2010 1073197 PWFLT-CREDIT-FOR PARTS OVER CH -6.56
2/19l2010 1073198 PWFLT-CREDIT- FOR PARTS OVER C -28.38
2/19l2010 1073200 PWFLT-CREDIT^FOR PARTS OVER CH -6.56
2/20/2010 1073223 PWFLT-MAJOR SERVICE 133.47
2/20/2010 1073229 PWFLT-MAJOR SERVICE 139.90
2/9/2010 1073025 PD-LOF 29.55
2/9/2010 1073025 PD-ELECTRICAL WORK 41.16
2/9/2010 1073025 PD-TIRES 531.49
216114 3l15/2010 006177 EARL, SHARYN LYNN 690.00
2/5/2010 10003 CD-UTILITIES CORRIDOR GRAPHICS 240.00
2/8l2010 10002 PRCS-SRPING 2010 PARKS BROCHUR 450.00
216115 3l15/2010 009021 EDWARDS, NOLAND A 100.00
2/19/2�10 02/19l10 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 100.00
216116 3/15/2010 011867 ELITE SURFACES LLC, 805.92
2/8/2010 2280 PRCS-REPAIRS TO WALL SURFACE I 805.92
216117 3/15/2010 011930 ENGELHART, NANCY 50.00
2/25l2010 730759 FWCC-RENTALAMEND. REFUND 50.00
216118 3/15/2010 001294 ENTERPR�SE SEATTLE, 40,833.33
3!1l2010 10002 CM- 2/10 AG10-030 HEALTHCARE I 40,833.33
216119 3/15l2010 001046 EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SVC, 20.00
2/23/2010 5245859 PD-02/10 CREDIT REPORTS 20.00
216120 3/15l2010 000328 ERNtE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA), 6,334.43
2/28/2010 0328635 PINFLT-2/15-2/28/10 FUEL 3,209.60
2/15l2010 0327844 PWFLT-2/1-2/15/10FUEL 3,124.83
216121 3/15/2010 002899 ESA ADOLFSON, 5,955.50
2/23/2010 88452 CDPL-AG06-018 SMP PSA- 2,455.65
2/10l2010 88266 CD-#02-79075 WSDOT TRIANGLE PR 3,499.85
2/10/2010 88266 CD-#02-79075 WSDOT TRIANGLE PR 3,499.85
2/10/2010 88266 CD-#02-790751NSDOT TRIANGLE PR -3,499.85
216122 3/15/2010 001748 EVERSON'S ECONO-VAC INC, 239.81
2/17/2010 064821 PKM-CAMERA PIPE FOR BLOCKAGE @ 239.81
216123 3/15/2010 011726 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS, INC, 655.12
2/15/2010 1423321 PKM-PLASTIC VALVE BOX PUMP/INV 416.38
2/24/2010 1449929 PKM-QUIKPRO HERBICIDE/INV#1449 238.74
216124 3/15/2010 006645 EXPRESS TOWING LLC, 595.67
2/9/2010 10755 PD-VEHICIE TOWING SVC 163.95
1/28/2010 40518 PD-VEHICLE TOWING SVC 92.90
2/3/2010 10720 PD-VEHICLE TOWING SVC 174.88
1/1/2010 10453 P0.VEHICLE TOWING #09-14792 81.97
2/18/2010 10746 PD-VEHICLE TOWING SVC 81.97
216125 3/15/2010 000217 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, 88.27
2/5/2010 9-491-17308 PWST-FED EX TO STOP EXPERTS 52.80
2H2/2010 9-498-86558 fl-FEDEX RETURN TO THOMPSON PU 18.73
2/12/2010 9-498-86558 FI-FEDEX PASSPORT DOCS 16.74
216126 3/15/2010 000229 FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER COMMERCE, 8,333.33
3!1l2010 7230 CM-AG10-020 SM. BUSINESS INCUB 8,333.33
216127 3/15/2010 001893 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 11,684.44
3/9/2010 SIF-FEBRUARY 2010 FI-02/10 SCHL IMPACT FEE 11,681.00
3/9/2010 SIF-FEBRUARY 2010 FI-02/10 SCHL IMPACT fEE 3.44
216128 3/15/2010 002664 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC, 288.80
2/28/2010 152072 HR-02/10 FLEX PLAN ADM SVCS 288.80
Bank of A merica
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice
216129 3/15/2010 004366 FLOYD EQUIPMENT COMPANY DBA,
2/4/2010 67478
2/12/2010 67634
216130 3/15/2010 008860 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA,
2/24/2010 1972380
216131 3/15/2010 00?669 FOSTER PEPPER& SHEFELMAN PLLC,
2/22l2010 942702
216132 3/15/2010 OQ9861 FRANCISCAN INPATIENT SERVICE,
12l7/2009 99018-t
12l8/2009 99018-1
216133 3/15/2010 009242 FSH COMMUNICATIONS LLC,
3/1/2010 000346853
216134 3/15/2010 007404 FULLER, MICHELLE M
3/2/2010 A3/02/70
2/19/2010 02/19l10
216�35 3l15/2010 004566 G&M HONEST PERFORMANCE,
2/18/2010 131580
216136 3/15/2U10 011940 GARAGE TOWN FEDERAL WAY,
2/23l2010 �401485 REFUND
2/23/2010 05-00660 REFUND
2l23/2010 OS-00660 REFUND A
216137 3/15/2010 011650 GEBREMICHAEL, MERIAM
2/12/2010 02/12/10
3/2/2010 03/02/10
216138 3/15/2010 001478 GEOLINE POSITIONING SYSTEMS,
2/18l2010 304721
216139 3/15/2010 �00117 GFOA-GOV'T FINANCE OFFICERS,
2/9/2010 0142003
216140 3/15/2010 010940 GOODYEAR WFiOLESALE TIRE CNTR,
2/11l2010 140866
2l11/2010 140868
2/5/2010 140729
2/22/2010 141206
216141 3/15/2010 004824 GOS PRINTING CORPORATION,
2/19l2010 73956
2/16/2010 73998
2/24/2010 73991
216142 3/15/2010 002574 GRAHAM & DUNN, P.C.,
2/24/2010 298011
216143 3l15/2010 002547 GRAINGER INC,
2/19/2010 9187932562
2/9/2010 9180066756
216144 3/15/2010 011932 GRAZIANO, GINA
2/17/2010 727552
216145 3/15/2010 010738 GREEN EFFECTS, INC,
3/1/2010 29758
216146 3/15/2010 011400 GRIFFIN, THERESA
2/15/2010 FEBRUARY 15, 2010
216147 3/15l2010 011929 GUERRERA, ANA
2/25/2010 730758
216148 3H5/2010 011946 GURALNYUK, LEONID
2l24/2010 2009 GURALNYUK
216149 3/15/2010 001367 HDR ENGINEERING INC,
- 2/3/2010 171448-H
2/3/2010 171448-H
216150 3/15/2010 011939 HERNANDEZ, SADE
2/26/2010 731378
216151 3/15/2010 001487 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,
2/17/2010 47194984
2/17/2010 47194984
2/17/2010 47194984
2/17/2010 47194984
PKM-FLAT BAR TO FIX FIELD
PKM-FLATBAR TO REPAIR SACAJAWE
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
LAW-AG09-139 LEGAL SERVICES-
PD-12/09 PRISONER MED TREAT
PD-12/09 PRISONER MED TREAT
IT-03/01 FSH PAYPHONE SVCS
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
PWFLT-REPAIR SUPPIIES
PW-04-01485 GARAGE TOWN BOND
PV1h05-00660 INSPECT DEPOSIT RE
PW-0&00660 PARTIAL BOND RELEA
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
PD-GPS SYSTEM REPAIR
FI-GFOA 2010 DUES ENGE,KRAUSE,
PD-NEW TIRES
PD-NEW TIRES
PD-NEW TIRES
PD-N�W TIRES
PD-CASE TRACKING FORMS
PD-TRAFFIC SCHL APPLICATIONS
P0.CITIZEN ACADEMY BROCHURES
LAW-SR99 HOV LANES PHASE IV-
PKM-GAS CANS/INV#9187932562
fWCC- V-BELTS 8 THERMOSTAT
FWCC-REFUND SUSPEND CHARGE
FWCG2/10 LANDSCAPING AGO&O6
CM-AG09-055 CONFLICT DEFENDER-
PRCS-CLASS FEE REFUND
CM-2009 UTILITY TAX
SWM-AG09-128 HYLEBOS CK. RESTO
SWM-AG09-128 HYLEBOS CK. RESTO
PRCS-CLASS FEE REPUND
1T-RR PHASE I PG
1T-RR PHASE I PC-
IT-HP PHASE 1 MONITOR-
IT-HP BASIC DOCKING STATION 12
Page 18 of 36
Amount Check Totai
150.56
70.61
79.95
1,016.67
1, 016.67
48.00
48.00
409.00
265.00
144.00
80.00
80.00
240.00
120.00
120.00
26.44
26.44
8,903.80
5,000.00
2,399.50
1,504.30
200.00
100.00
100.00
340.00
340.00
640.00
640.00
1,683.38
384.88
411.30
411.30
475.90
1,075.84
536.88
310.89
228.07
3,648.50
3,648.50 .
721.60
473.52
248.08
61.58
61.58
234.24
234.24
250.00
250.00
115.00
115.00
40.56
40.56
8,109.00
-16,058.25
24,167.25
43.00
43.00
10,855.83
1,836.33
5,508.99
2,168.04
370.11
Bank of America Page 19 of 36
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
2/10/2010 47161886 IT- HP SATA SUPERMULTI LIGHTS 972.36
216152 3l15/2010 010092 HIGGINS, BRYAN 162.86
3/4/2010 HIGGINS-2010 PKM-WORK PANTS/HIGGINS 162.86
216153 3/15/2010 011754 HOMAVAND, JOHN 100.00
2/19I2010 02/19/10 MC-INTERPRETER SVCS 100.00
216154 3/15/2010 002477 HOME DEPOT-DEPT 32-2500780030, 441.26
2/28/2010 FEBRUARY 2Q10 DBGCART WHEELS, LIGHT BULB, T 170.85
2/26/2010 FEBRUARY 2010 DBC-RETURN CART WHEELS -61.18
2/28/2010 FEBRUARY 2010 PKM-HYLEBOS AWNVNG REPAIR MATL 40.29
2/28/2010 FEBRUARY 2010 PD-SPEED WATCH TRAIIER REPAIRS 11.25
2/28/2010 FEBRUARY 2010 PD-BATTERY CHARGER WHEELS 8.69
2/28/2010 FEBRUARY 2010 FWCC-MASKS, CART, TAPE, BATTER 46.87
2/28/201� FEBRUARY 2010 FWCC-MASKS, CART, TAPE, BATTER 138.39
2/28/2010 FEBRUARY 2010 PWST-TOOL SET 65.67
2/28/2010 FEBRUARY 2010 PWfR-REPAIRlMAINT SUPPLIES 20.43
216155 3l15/2010 009785 HOWARD, TODD 500.00
2/18/2010 93 CM-AG09-003 CONFLICT DEFENDER 250.00
2/11l20t0 92 CM-AG09-003 CONFLICT DEFENDER 250.00
216156 3/15/2010 001431 ICON MATERIALS INC, 171.37
1/17/2010 50-1395539 PKM-ASPHALT TO REPAIR 171.37
216157 3l15/2010 007109 INTERCOM LANGUAGE SVCS, 2.345.00
2/1l2010 10-24 MC-INTERPRETER SVCS 1,025.00
2/16l2010 10-043 MC-INTERPRETER SVCS 1,320.00
216158 3/15/2010 011935 INTERNATIONAL HAIR BANK, HO SUNG YU 60.00
3/8/2010 01-79482 REFUND FI-INTL HAIR BANK REFUND DUP R 50.00
3!8/2010 01-79482 REFUND FI-INTL HAIR BANK REFUND DUP R 10.00
216159 3/15/2010 010737 INTERWEST DEVELOPMENT NW INC, 73.91
2/10/2010 64706 PKM-BARK FOR CITY HALUINV#647 73.91
216160 3/15/2010 001133 IPMA-HR INT'L PUBLIC MGMT ASSO, 360.00
2l26/2010 24161299 HR-IPMA 2010 AGENCY DUES 360.00
216161 3/15/2010 003211 IRON MOUNTAIN/SAFESITE �NC, 3,008.88
2/28/2010 BNA9639 HRCK-02/10 AG96-156 RECORDS ST 3,008.88
216162 3/15/2010 011711 J 8 D PRINTING INC, 215.16
2/25/2010 46025 CM/ED - PRINTING OF SPRING "WH 215.16
216163 3/15/2010 009079 J AND Y INVESTMENT LLC, 550.00
3/11l2010 FEBRUARY 2010 IT-02/10 WIFI SITE LEASE AG05- 275.00
3/11/2010 JANUARY 2010 IT-01/10 WIFI SITE LEASE AGOS- 275.00
216164 3/15/2010 005978 JACKSON, LAURIE 200.00
1l28/2010 JACKSON 2010 PD-CALEA CONF. L JACKSON 200.00
216165 3/15l2010 010605 JACOBSON, ELIZABETH 739.20
3/3/2010 FEBRUARY 2010 PRCS-BALLROOM DANCE CLASSES- 739.20
216166 3l15l2010 005656 JIM'S DETAIL SHOP, 65.00
2/26l2010 13363F PD-INTERIOR DETAIL 65.00
216167 3/15/2010 011736 KIM, CHUL JOON 400.00
2/23/2010 02/23/10 MC-INTERPRETER SVCS 100.00
2/19/2010 02/19/10 MGINTERPRETER SVCS 100.00
Z/19/2010 02/19/10 A MC-INTERPRETER SVCS 100.00
3/2/2010 03/OZ/10 MC-INTERPRETER SVCS 100.00
216168 3/15/2010 001259 KING COUNTY CRIME VICTIMS FUND, 2,110.81
3/9/2010 FEB 2010 FI-02l10 REMIT CRIME VICTIM FE 2,110.81
216169 3/15l2010 000125 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION, 122,626.83
2/17/2010 1557950 PKM-KING COUNTY BACKFEE CHARGE 4.08
3/8/2010 1557965 PWfR-01/10 BSC SIGN/MRKNGS MTN 52,375.07
3/8/2010 1557969 PWfR-OT/10 BSC SIGN/MRKNGS MTN 1;842.27
3/1012010 1557970 PWi-01/10 DISC INVSTGTN TRFFC- 390:54
3/10/2010 1557970 PWTR-01/10 DISC INVST NTS SCHL 108.39
3/10/2010 1557970 PWST-01/10 DISC iNVST S 356TH 4,081.14
3/10/2010 1557970 PWDS-01l10 DISC INVST PANTHER 44.66
3l10/2010 1557970 IT-01/10 DISC iNVST SAFE CITY 54.83
2/17/2010 1557966 PWf-01H� DISC INVSTGTN TRFFC- 98.40
2/17/2010 1557966 PWf-01/10 16TH AVE SIGNAL INST 37.71
2/22/2010 1558433 IT-03l10 NET SVCS 419.20
Bank of America
Check No. Date
216170 3/15/2010
216171 3/15/2010
216178 3/15/2010
Vendor Inv Date invoice
2/22/2010 1558433
2/22/2010 1558433
2/22/2010 1558433
2/22/2010 1559279
000564 KING COUNTY PET LICENSE,
3/9/2010 PET-FEB 2010
003898 KING COUNTY RADIO,
3/8/2010 3632
2/20/2010 00421871
?J20/2010 00422312
003137 KING COUNTY TREASURY DIVISION,
3!2l2010 957814047008
3/2/2010 112103902709
312J2010 189545039001
3!8/2010 9264951'14007
3/8l2010 926496100005
3/8l2070 926496101003
3/8/2010 926500019506
3/8/2010 926975093002
3/8l2010 954280202001
3/2l2010 005050011005
3/2/2�10 005050012003
3/2/2010 005070020002
3/2/2010 010450111009
3/2/2010 010451060007
3/2/2010 012103903907
3/2/2010 012109301901
3!2/2010 042104920006
3/2/2010 042104924206
3!2/2010 066231095002
3!2/2010 066231096000
3/2J2010 082104925407
3/2/2010 092'104928004
3/2/2010 0921�4930307
3/2/2010 111263029006
3!2/2010 111263030004
3!2/2010 112103902501
3/2/2010 113780048006
3!2/2010 119600033201
3/2/2010 122'103904100
3/2/2010 122103904902
3/2/2010 122103915908
3/2/2010 132140099004
3/Z/201� 132140100000
3/2/2Q 10 132173087009
3/2/2010 132174090002
3/2/2010 132174091000
3/2/2010 132190023003
3/2/2010 167300089007
3/2/201� 167300089106
3/2/2010 167300093009
3/2/2010 176110055009
3/2/2010 176110057005
3/2/2010 189830032000
3/2/2010 189890033005
3/Z/2010 189890034003
3/2/2010 211551063004
3/2/2010 211570027006
3/2/2010 211572058009
3/2/2010 241260015003
3/2/2010 241330110008
3/2/2010 242103904403
3/2/2010 242103907000
3/2/2010 255700096001
Description
IT-03/10 NET SVCS
IT-03/10 NET SVCS
IT-03/10 NET SVCS
PD-01/10 KING CO JAIL�
FI-02/10 KC PET FEES REMIT FEE
IT-PD-RADIO MAINT/REPAIR
IT-PD-RADIO MAINT/REPAIR
IT-PD-RADIO MAINT/REPAIR
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1F2010 NOX WEED TAX
PVt�2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NO)(/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-201U KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PVw2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOXISWM TAXES
PV1F2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PV1�2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PV1�2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PV1ti2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PVw2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PV1�2010 KC NOXISWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PV1�2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
Page 20 of 36
Amount Check Total
104.80
262.00
262.00
62, 541.74
429.00
429.00
8,476.80
8,132.13
128.97
225.70
1,580.90
2.10
3.60
2.25
2.10
2.70
4.35
2.10
2.40
3.90
2.10
2.10
2.25
2.25
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.25
222.96
2.55
2.10
87.40
2.25
2.25
3.30
2.10
3.60
2.25
2.10
2.55
3.45
2.10
2.10
225
225
2.25
2.10
2.t0
2.25
2.25
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
87.25
2.10
2.10
87.25
2.10
2.10
Bank of A merica
Check No. Date Vendor
Inv Date
3/2l2010
3/2l2010
3/2l2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3!2/20T0
3/2/2070
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
312/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3!2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3!2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3!2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
I nvoice
279150057008
286850008009
290931021007
292104902104
292104908002
294450073001
294450074009
294451031008
302104913207
302104917604
302104917703
304020005506
304020006009
306560052004
1898200140�0
308900022507
322104904907
322104905508
327905020001
337530071006
416795032000
416795Q33008
416795034006
416795035003
416795056009
440670006004
502945129000
515330023000
516200046006
516210086000
525980050005
542090011009
542242088004
542242089002
542350062007
554760016002
555960017005
555990019005
556050043000
556050044008
609330007004
615100013007
6181401010Q6
618143091006
618143092004
638515022009
667265052007
667265053005
726640002605
738700011005
742800043009
750380037002
750380038000
779645071001
788878015007
798380032002
800200011008
802950066000
802950067008
891420044002
894720013008
921151092001
921152058001
921152060007
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW4010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
P1M-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PV�2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PV1ti2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW4010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2o10 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PV1�2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PV1F-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PVU-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PV1�2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PV�2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW4010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC'NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/S1NM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
Page 21 of 36
Amount Check Total
2.10
2.10
2.25
4.50
3.00
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.55
2.10
2.25
2.10
2.10
2.10
225
2.40
3.45
2.40
2.25
2.25
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.25
2.10
2.10
87.25
2.10
2.10
87.40
2.70
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.40
2.25
2.25
2.10
2.25
2.10
2.25
2.10
2.10
225
2.10
2.25
2.10
2.25
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
Bank of America
Check No. Date Vendor
Inv Date
3/2/2010
3/Z/2010
3/2/2010
3/2/2010
3!8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3!8/2010
3/8/201 �
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8l2010
3/8/2010
3/8l201 �
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3!8/2010.
3/8/2010
3/812010
3/8/2010
3!8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3!8/2010
3/8l2010
3/8/2010
3/8l2010
3/8/201 �
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/S/2010
3/8/2010
3!8l2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/20'10
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8l2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2�10
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8l2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3!8/2010
3/8l2010
3/8/2010
3/8l2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
I nvoice
926910007000
926975092004
941269008004
957814046000
383300000502
416730036009
438800052005
440561027002
502860230007
502946058000
502946059008
516210087008
542242090000
542242091008
542350064003
555730049007
555732023000
666490058003
666490059001
666491043004
666491045009
666491046007
666491047005
720560018007
729802028005
729805060005
873219105004
894430083002
894430084000
894500107509
921150074000
921150077003
921151091003
921151093009
926490231004
926491159006
926492115007
926492116005
926493100008
926494117001
926494118009
926494119007
926495112001
926495113009
167300092001
167300092009
167300092100
172104910309
182104901109
182104903600
182104904103
182104905704
186270047001
189831047007
189860017004
202104901808
202104905403
202104905700
211551062006
218000000503
218000003002
218000009504
218000018505
218000020501
Description
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 KC NOX/SWM TAXES
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX VVEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1h2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEEO TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX VVEED TAX
PV1�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PVIti2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1F2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1F-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PVw2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-20�0 NQX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1h2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PN�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-201� NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PVU-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
P1/�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
Page 22 of 36
Amount Check Total
2.25
2.10
2.10
2.10
3.00
2.25
420
2.25
3.00
2.40
2.10
2.40
2.40
2.25
2.55
2.25
2.10
2.25
2.10
2.25
2.85
39.62
14.46
2.10
2.25
3.60
2.70
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.25
2.10
2.40
2.10
3:15
3.60
2.55
2.85
4.65
3.30
2.55
2.1 U
2.55
2.25
2.10
2.10
2.10
5.10
3.60
2.85
2.40
2.40
3.90
2.85
2.10
2.85
7.05
2.70
2.40
2.10
225
2.25
2.25
2.25
Bank of America
Check No. Date
216179 3/15/2010
Vendor Inv Date
3/8/2010
3!8/2010
3/8/2010
3!8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8l2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8l2010
3/8/2010
3l812010
3/8/2010
3!8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8l2010
3/8/201 d
3/8/2010
3/S/2010
3!8/2010
3/8l2010
3/8/2010
3/8l201 �
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3!8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3/8/2010
3!8/2010
005064 KOCHMAR, LINDA
3/1/2010
216180 3/15l2010 009492 KPG INC,
1l25/2010
216181 3/15/2010 001456 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC,
12/30/2009
216182 3/15/2010 005536 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY iNC,
1/27/2010
I nvoice
218000024008
215000080000
218000080505
218000081008
218000082006
218000093508
218000129005
218000139103
218000139202
218000139301
218820242004
218820371506
218820400503
241330109000
292104900801
292104900900
292104901304
292104902302
292104904100
2921Q4905909
292104906808
292104907509
292104915007
2921049152Q5
292104915403
292104915502
292104915601
292104915700
306560051006
326070119002
327900075000
327900076008
327900077006
010450109003
010450110001
010450112007
Ot0452034001
010452035008
0104530650Q4
012103900804
012103904707
042104921905
062104901202
072104909808
072104923205
08210490�103
082104909708
082104927304
0921049250�0
112103900505
113960036003
114000031004
114001017002
114001018000
1221039Q1601
132103904307
KOCHMAR 2010
10610
407382
1014570859
Description
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PVU-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV16-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1F2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-20'10 NOX WEED TAX
PVW2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1F-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1h2010 NOX WEED TAX
PNW2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1F2010 NOX WEED TAX
PARKS 31104 28TH NOX WEED
PV1F2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PV1�2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
PW-2010 NOX WEED TAX
CG2/10 MILEAGE REIMB KOCHMAR
SWM-AG06-O55 ON-CALL SURVEYING
PD-RADAR LASER REPAIR
SWM-SAFETY SUPPLIES
Amount
225
2.10
2.10
2.25
2.70
2.10
2.55
2.25
2.10
2.25
2.10
2.10
2.10
225
3.30
2.85
2.85
7.05
2.40
2.55
2.40
2.25
2.55
2.10
2.85
3.00
3.d5
8.40
2.85
2.70
2.25
2.25
2.25
2.40
2.55
2.40
2.55
2.10
3.60
3.75
7.65
2.25
2.25
4.05
2.10
7.80
2.55
2.10
283.96
5.10
2.25
2.25
2.25
2.25
6.30
3.60
Page 23 of 36
Check Total
111.90
111.90
5,719.00
5,719.00
236.00
236.00
272.11
272.11
Bank of America
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date
216183 3/15/201� 000096 LAKEFfAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT,
3/9/2010 101
3!9/2010 101
3/9/2010 2049903
3/9/2010 ' 2814401
3/9/2010 3033601
3/9/2010 3088801
3/9/2010 3200201
3/9/2010 3278301
3/9/2010 3336101
3/9/2010 3364101
3/9/2010 3488801
3/9/2010 3540201
3/9l2010 3540301
3/9/2010 3545101
3/8/2010 460602
3/9/2010 460602
3!9/2010 482303
3/9/2010 482405
3/9l2010 822402
3/9/2010 824102
3/9/2010 824102
3/9l2010 888103
3/9/2010 888103
3/9l2010 888302
3/9/2010 888302
3/9/2010 896402
3!9l2010 899802
3!9/2010 899802
216184 3/15/2010 011928 LqNE, BARBARAA.
2/21 /2010 1561 P
216185 3/15/2010 011895 LEE, BRUCE
1/27/2010 I-30671
216186 3/15/2010 006405 LEE, DAVID
216187 3/15/2010 004052 LEED,
3/8l2010 LEE 2010
Invoice
3/1/2010 03011003
216188 3/15/2010 000630 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC,
2/11J2010 137736
1/28l2010 137627
2/2/2010 137487
216189 3/15/2010 005339 LOWE'S HIW INC,
Z/12/2010 02326
1/2712010 02783
2/17/2010 14244
2/23/2010 02525
2/23/2010 02525
2/24/2010 01096
2/24/2010 02653
2/24/2010 -02656
2/24/2010 02657
2/24/2010 18865
2/24/2010 19595
2/25/2010 02721
216190 3/15/2010 010453 LUBRANT, ARRON
3/1/2010 LUBRANT 2010
216191 3l15/2010 005043 MACHINERY POWER & EQUIPMENT CO,
1/29/2010 32003686-0002
216192 3/15/2010 001004 MAILMEDIA DBA IMMEDIA,
2/19/2010 59323
216193 3/15/2010 011938 MAIPI, XAVIER
2/16/2010 02/16/10
216194 3/15/2010 OU5176 MERINO STRAWE, BETTY
Description
PKM-11/09-12/09 31132 28TH AVE
PKM-11/09-12/09 31132 28TH AVE
PKM-11l09-12l09 31531 1ST AVE
PKM-11/09-12/09 2645 312TH IRR
PKM-11/09-1/10 28159 24TH PL S
PWST-11/09-12/09 2000 312TH ST
PWST-11/09-12/09 32002 32RD AE
PWST-11/09-12/09 32009 23RD AV
PWST-11/09-12/09 3336101 PAC H
PWST-11/09-42/09 1618 S 288TN
PWST-11l09-1?J09 31802 21ST AV
PWST-11/09-12/09 29627 PAC HWY
PWST-11l09-12/09 28719 PAC HWY
PWST-11/09-12/09 29102 PAC HWY
PKM-11/09-12/09 2645 312TH ST
PKM-11/09-12/09 2645 312TH ST
PWST-11/09-12/09 28866 PAC HWY
PWST-11/09-12/09 28850 PAC HWY
PKM-11/09-12/09 30009 16TH AVE
PKM-11/09-12/09 30000 14TH AVE
PKM-11/09-12/09 30000 14TH AVE
PKM-11/09-12l09 31132 28TH AVE
PKM-11/09-12/09 31132 28TH AVE
PKM- 11l09-17J09 31104 28TH AV
PKM- 11/09-12/09 31104 28TH AV
PKM- 11/09-12/09 2410 312TH ST
PKM- 11/09-12/09 2410 312TH ST
PKM- 11/09-1?J09 2410 312TH ST
LA1/�CA 54705 TRANSCRIBER
PRCS-WALL RAIL FOR ART HANGING
CD-APA CONF. DAVID LEE
PD-IMPACT SPONGES
PWST-CONCRETE MIX
PARKS-STLK UNDERGRN TANK-GRAVE
PKM-5/S" CRUSHED GRAVEUINV#13
SWM-TRAILER HITCHES
PKM-PLYWOOD
PKM-FENCE POST CAP
PWST-GLOVES, SHOP TOWELS, EAR
SWR-55 GAL DRUM LINERS
PWST-3 DRAWER INTERMEDIATE TOO
PWST-UTILITY TOOL
PWST-RETURN UTILITY TOOL
PWST-METAL HAND BOX
PWST-3 DRAWER INTERMEDIATE TOO
SWM-INFLATOR GAUGE, BLOW GUN
SWM-FLAGGING TAPE
PD-GLASSES DAMAGED ON DUTY REI
PKM-RENTAL OF
PRCS-SPRING 2010 REC $ROCHURE
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
Page 24 of 36
Amount Check Total
1,745.67
17.88
22.00
17.88
17.88
128.63
18.13
17.88
17.88
17.88
33.53
17.88
240.38
17.88
17.88
104.78
34.54
39.88
73.48
427.46
97.34
44.00
53.52
53.35
19.12
24.09
17.88
109.74
42.90
604.00
604.00
208.12
208.12
299.30
299.30
885.98
885.98
1,323.23
160.83
1,068.22
94.18
317.80
39.50
40.48
1.07
66.57
74.90
43.80
32.83
-32.83
32.83
-03.80
42.60
19.85
223.96
223.96
566.55
566.55
1,246.61
1,246.61
100.00
100.00
200.00
Bank of America
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoic
2/16/2010 02/16/10
2/23/2010 02/23/10
216195 3/15/2010 001793 MICROFLEX INC,
2/24/2010 00019171
216196 3/15/2010 008029 MONTES DE OCA RICKS, MARIA
3/2/2010 03/02/10 A
3/2/2010 03/02/10
216197 3/15/2010 011947 MOON, APRIL
3/4/2010 2009 MOON
216198 3/15/2010 003352 MOTOROLA INC,
2/25/2010 13775277
2/25/2010 13775277
2/25/2010 13775277
2/25/2010 13775277
2/25/2010 13775277
2/25/2010 13775277
2/25l2010 13775277
216199 3/15/2010 000228 MULTI-SERVICE CENTER,
2/22/2010 101
216200 3l15l2010 008858 NEVERS, SHERYL
3!4/2010 2009 NEVERS
216201 3/15/2010 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPANY,
2/26/2010 244410
2/18/2010 244224
2/18/2010 244234
2/23/2010 244330
2/19/2010 244239
2/19/2010 244260
2/19/2010 244261
1/27/2010 243672
216202 3/15/2010 010430 NOEDEL, MATTHEW
3/4/2010 APRIL 26-30 2010
216203 3/15/2010 001391 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY,
2/23/2010 S3271179.001
2/8l2010 S3246012.001
1/26/2010 S3228230.001
1l28/2010 S3228247.002
1l27/2010 53228247.001
216204 3/15/2010 008519 NORTHWEST EMERG PHYS INC,
12l7/2009 88520209/511
216205 3/15/2010 003392 NORTHWEST LININGS & GEOTEXTILE,
2/1l2010 0034218-IN
216206 3/15/2010 011915 NORTHWEST RECREATION OF WA,
1/27/2010 80-525531
216207 3/15/2010 003736 NORTHWEST TOWING INC,
2/26/2010 403717
2/12/2010 404093
216208 3/15/2010 D10135 NW PRECAST LLC,
2!3/2010 02-01
216209 3/15/2010 003529 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES,
2/4/2010 340673-001
216210 3/15/2010 000007 OFFICEMAX CONTRACT INC,
2/28/2010 FEBRUARY 2010
216211 3/15/2010 008756 OLSON, DONALD W.
2/23l2010 2009 OLSON
216213 3/15/2010 011651 OMAR, ABDULLAHI
2/19/2010 02/19/10
8/18/2009 08/18/09
216214 3/15/2010 007444 ORCA PACIFIC INC,
2I4/2010 042613
2/11/2010 042708
216215 3/15/2010 005312 ORTA, SCOTT
Description
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
FI-11/09 TAX AUDIT PROG.
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
CM-2009 UTILITY TAX
IT/PD - RR MOBILE RADIOS-
IT/PD - RR MOBILE RADIOS-
IT/PD - RR MOBILE RADIOS-
IT/PD - RR MOBILE RADIO-
IT/PD - RR MOBILE RADIO-
ITlPD - RR MOBILE RADIO-
IT/PD - RR MOBILE RADlO-
CM - SWEETS FOR SUCCESS 2010 A
CM-2009 UTILITY TAX
PWST-FLAT WHITE ENAMEL PAINT
PKM- JOIST HANGER, MISC SCREWS
PWST-120Z WD 40
SWNI-SILVER TARP
PWST-FATMAX KNIFE, LUMBER
PWST-60L6 PREMIX CONCRETE
SWM-SGAL PAIL
SWM-LUMBER FOR CONCRETE SIDEWA
PD-TRAINING COURSE REG FEE
CHB-RETURN CORD PLUG
PKM-50 AMP EXTENSION CORD PLUG
PKM-RETURN PLUG ADAPTORS
PKM-PLUG ADAPTOR/INV#3228247
PKM-PLUG ADAPTORlINV#3228247
PD-12/09 PRISONER MED TREAT
PKM-FABRIC NEEDED PRIOR TO INS
PKM-PLAYGROUND COMPONENTS/INV#
PD-8/4/09 TOYOTA IMPOUND CHG
PD-VEHICLE TOWING SVCS
SWM-CONCRETE STRUCTURE REBILD
HR-HEP B VACCINE
DBC-02/10 OFFICE SUPPLIES
CM-2009 UTILITY TAX
MGINTERPRETER SVCS
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
FWCC-AG09-020 POOL CHEMICALS M
fWCC-AG09-020 POOL CHEMICALS M
Page 25 of 36
Amount Check Total
100.00
100.00
179.20
17920
275.00
100.00
175.00
208.69
208.69
17,202.67
4,244.00
2,213.52
6,446.90
1,856.80
1,719.25
59.70
662.50
2,500.00
2,500.00
249.30
249.30
110.51
11.79
14.29
6.01
14.77
24.41
6.55
22.93
9.76
800.00
800.00
1.95
-194.42
206.25
-204.29
106.89
87.52
ns.00
ris.00
706.28
706.28
397.49
397.49
2,409.00
2,190.00
279.00
2,344.56
2,344.56
75.00
75.00
141.06
141.06
74.57
74.57
200.00
100.00
100.00
1,217.50
696.45
521.05
220.00
Bank of America
Check No. �ate Vendor Inv Date Invoice
3/2/2010 ORTA 2010
216216 3l15/2010 005741 OUTCOMES BY LEVY,
1/31/2010 JANUARY 2010
216217 3/15/2010 000315 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE CO,
2/17l2010 1108187
2/23/2010 645358B
216218 3/15/2010 001814 PARAMETRIX INC,
2/16/2010 04-11247
216219 3/15l2010 011948 PARK, SUN
3/3I2010 2009 PARK
216220 3/15/2010 005479 PARTIES BY MEL,
2/13/2010 FEBRUARY 13, 2010
216221 3l15/2010 011127 PARTSMASTER,
2/2l2010 20335269
21fi222 3/15/2010 011949 PETERSEN, KENNETH R.
3/1/2010 2009 PETERSEN
216223 3/15/2010 011781 PETTY CASH - MS,
3/11/2010 FI-3/11/10
3l11/2010 FI-3/11/10
3/11l2010 F{-3/11/10
3/11/2010 FI-3/11/10
3/11/2010 FI-3/11/10
3/11l2010 FI-3/11/10
3/11/2010 FI-3/11/10
3/11/2010 FI-3H1/10
3/11/2010 FI-3/11l10
3/11/2010 FI-3l11l10
3/11/2010 FI-3/11/10
3/11/2010 FI-3/11/10
3l11l2010 FI-3l11/10
3l11/2010 FI-3/11/10
3/11/2010 FI-3l11/10
3/11/2010 FI-3l11l10
3/11/2010 FI-3l11l10
3/11/2010 FI-3/11/10
3l11/2010 FI-3/11M0
3l11/2010 FI-3l11/10
3l11/2010 FI-3/11/10
3/11/2010 fl-3/11/10
3/11/2010 FI-3/11/10
3/11/2010 FI-3/11/10
216224 3/15/2010 002557 PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS MAINT,
3/9/2010 PKM-03/9/10
3/9/2010 PKM-03/9/10
3/9/2010 PKM-03/9/10
3/9l2010 PKM-03/9l10
3/9/2010 PKM-03/9/10
3/9/2010 PKM-03/9/10
3/9l2010 PKM-03/9/10
3/9l2010 PKM-03/9/10
3/9/2010 PKM-03/9/10
3/9/2010 PKM-03/9/10
3/9/2010 PKM-03/9/10
3/9/2010 PKM-03/9/10
3/9/2010 PKM-03/9/10
216225 3/15/2010 005960 PHIL'S SOUTH SIDE CYCLERY,
2/3/2010 FEBRUARY 3, 2010
2/3/2010 FEBRUARY 3, 2010
1/5/2010 JANUARY 5, 2010
1/14/2010 JANUARY 4, 2010
1/15/2010 JANUARY 15, 2010
1/19/2010 JANUARY 19, 2010
1/20/2010 JANUARY 20. 2010
Description
PD-EARPIECE SYSTEM X2
CM-AG10-001 LEGISLATIVE LOBBY
PWST-PROPERTY HISTORY REPORT
PWST-ATHERTON/NEWPORT EASEMENT
PWST-AG09-219 348TH INTERSECTI
CM-2009 UTILITY TAX
PRCS-DAUGHTERS NIGHT OUT DECOR
PWFLT-SLIDE RACK 8 TRAY CABLE
CM-2009 UTIL�TY TAX
HR-SODA FOR WELLNESS PARTY
CDHS-PICTURE DISC FOR MLK FOOD
FI- LICENSE & REGISTRATION 201
PWST- LUNCH FOR BRIAN LYBECK O
SWR- POSTAGE STAMPS
HR-IPMA SEMINAR 2/5l10 SEATTLE
HR-IPMA SEMINAR 2/5/10 SEATTLE
SWM-SNACKS FOR STAFF TRAININGW
SWM-SNACKS & WATER STAFF TRAIN
SWM-PER DIEM MEALS FOR VNLL &
SWM-WATER & SNACKS REFREHSMENT
HR-MUFFINS PASTRIES & FRUIT SM
CDHS-COOKIES SKCHS PLANNERS ME
PWTR-ITE{IMSA MEETING JESSE HA
PWFLT-TRAILER LICENSE FEES
PWfR-LUNCHES FOR THE LIGHT BRI
PWST-LUNCH PAT FOSTER- WSU URB
SWM-POSTAGE FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
SWM-WATER 8 SNACKS LMD MEETING
PWEOC-MASKING TAPE, SHARIE MAR
HRCK-PICTURE FRAM & MAT 2010-1
PRCS-BOWLING & LUNCH FOR INCLU
PWST-MILAGE FROM CLASS TO WORK
SWM-WATER & SNACKS LMD MEETING
PKM-PETTY CASH/REPORT COVERS F
PKM-PETTY CASHNVORK JEANS/COLL
PKM-PETTY CASH/MILEAGE/DICKINS
PKM-PETTY CASH/COFFEE FOR INTE
PKM-PETTY CASH/PER DIEM LUNCH
PKM-PETTY CASH/PER DIEM LUNCH
PKM-PETTY CASH/PER DIEM LUNCH
PKM-PETTY CASH/O-RINGS FOR
PKM-PETTY CASH/SCREWS FOR REPA
PKM-PETTY CASH/WORK JEANS/PERE
PKM-PETTY CASH/FOOD FOR PARKS
PKM-PETTY CASH/BOTTLED WATER F
Sales Tax
PD-BRAKE REPAIRS #1239
PD-SEAT & POST, HOUSING, CABLE
PD-REAR WHEEL #574
PD-LIGHT SET,CAT EYE BIKE 585
PD-CRANKARM 81KE 584
PD-BRAKE REPAIR #579
PD-BRAKE'REPAIR, RIMS #572
Page 26 of 36
Amount Check Total
220.00
4,735.47
4,735.47
713.97
575.97
138.00
11,053.31
11,053.31
103.58
103.58
173.78
173.78
212.51
272.51
203.93
203.93
492.10
11.76
4.37
32.75
30.00
26.40
20.00
10.00
7.23
20.76
30.00
39.78
14.88
6.49
35.00
25J5
30.00
30.00
8.90
9.27
33.38
27.34
27.00
3.56
7.48
341.19
9.83
38.37
11.00
7.98
30:00
30.00
15.00
0.44
1.64
89.97
95.16
3.49
8.37
576.10
128.94
89.24
65.70
32.70
25.19
81.58
102.93
Bank of America
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice
1/24/2010 JANUARY 24, 2010
216226 3/15/2010 000697 PIERCE COUNTY BUDGET & FINANCE,
Z/8/2010 AR105773
216227 3/15/2010 000697 PIERCE COUNTY BUDGET & FINANCE,
3/9/2010 0421303�16
216228 3/15/2010 000808 PLATT ELECTRIC Sl1PPLY,
2/17/2010 7364054
2/18/2010 7337704
2/18/2010 7345699
2/19/2010 7371646
2/24/2010 7388873
216229 3l15l2010 004680 PON, KEITH
2l22/2010 PON 2010
216230 3/15/2010 005583 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTIOPI INC,
2/20l2010 35683501
216231 3/15/2010 069363 PRO-TOW MAPLE VALLEY,
2/24/2010 104300
2/17/2010 104295
216232 3/15/2010 011934 PSPCC,
2/22/2010 11554
216233 3/15/2010 071942 PUBLIC FLEET MANAGERS ASSOC.,
2/17/2010 39
216234 3/15/2010 010492 PUBIIC HEALTH - SEATTLE AND,
2/26/2010 PR0076750
2/26/2010 PR0079558
3/31/2Q10 PR0023663
2/26/2010 PR0076750
2/26/2010 PR0079558
216235 3/15/2010 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC,
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1l2010 PWfR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWfR 20t0 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWT'R 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWiR 2010 2
3/1l2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWiR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWfR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 201U 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1l2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWfR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1l2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1l2010 PWfR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWfR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/t/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3!1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1l2010 PWfR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3!1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1l2010 PWfR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3!1l2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
Description
PD-TIRE TUBE, CABLE, SPOKE #57
HR-LEADERSHIP TRNG K CIMMER
PKM-2010 PROP TAX @ 24TN ST NE
CHB-LIGHT BALLAST
CHB-UGHT BULBS
CHB-LIGHT BULBS
CHB-EMERGENCY LIGHT
CH&LIGHT BULBS
PD-TUITION REIMB K PON
PKM-0XYGEN FOR FIELD SPRAYING
PD-TOWING SVC #10.2481
PD-VEHICLE TOWING SVC
DBC-REFUND RENTAL DEPOSIT
PWFLT-2010 MEMBERSHIP DUES
PRCS-KITCHEN 2010 HEALTH PERMI
FWCC-2010 HEALTH PERMIT RENEWA
DBGHEALTH PERMIT 2010
PRCS-KITCHEN 2010 HEALTH PERMI
fWCG2010 HEALTH PERMIT RENEWA
PWTR-02/10 CRNR S 316TH ST & 2
PWTR-0?J10 IiDYT RD & 340TH-
PWTR-02/10 PAC HWY S& S 330TH
PWTR-01J10 S 288TH ST & PAC HW
PWTR-02/10 S288TH & 18TH AVE S
PWTR-02/10 S 296TH PL & MILiTA
PWfR-02/10 S 320TH & 23 AV S-
PWiR-�2/10 S 322ND & 23 AVE S-
PWTR-02/10 S 336TH ST 8 PAC HW
PWTR-02/10 S 282ND & MILITARY
PWTR-02/10 S 316TH & PAC HWY S
PWTR-02/10 SW CRNR S 312TH & P
PWTR-02/10 SW 308TH & 2ND AVE
PWTR-02/10 SW 329TH WAY & HOYT
PWfR-02/10 VARIOUS LOCATIONS-
PWfR-02/10 1TH WAY S& 334TH S
PWTR-02/10 1ST WAY S& 336TH S
PWTR-02/10 1 ST AVE S& S 330TH
PWTR-02/10 1000 SW CAMPUS DR-
PWTR-02/10 115TH ST S 8 316ST
PWfR-02/10 1300 S 344TH ST-
PWfR-02/10 1403 SW 312TH ST PE
PWfR-02/10 1405 S 312TH ST.-
PWTR-02/10 1414S 324TH ST.-
PWTR-02/10 1790 SW 345TH PLACE
PWTR-02/10 18TH AVE & S 312 ST
PWfR-02/10 199 SW 311TH RLACE-
PWTR-02/10 21ST AVE SW & SW 33
PWTR-02/10 21ST AVE SW & SW 34
PWTR-02/10 21ST AVE S GRID ROA
PWTR-02/10 21ST AVE SW 8 SW 32
PWTR-02/10 21ST AVE SW & 356TH
PWTR-OZ/10 23RD AVE S& S 317T
PWTR-02110 23RD AVE S& 320TH
Page 27 of 36
Amount Check Total
49.82
45.00
as.00
18.15
18.15
646.63
65.92
382.09
27.29
127.48
43.85
2,029.00
2,029.00
17.30
17.30
434.40
260.64
173.76
78.82
78.82
100.00
100.00
2,635.20
73.20
73.20
878.40
805.20
805.20
80,788.69
97.80
131.67
90.63
7Q5.15
155.15
34.03
466.16
320.25
1,066.04
202.75
84.69
304.90
10.00
10.19
33.94
23.02
124.80
78.94
257.32
10.09
36.19
10.00
168.56
49.54
257.03
100.96
229.17
175.85
47822
118.26
157.45
135.53
300.05
270.43
Bank of America
Check No. Date Vendor
Inv Date
3/1/2010
3/1/2010
3/1/2010
3/1 /2010
3/ 1 /2010
3/1/2010
3/1 /2010
3/1l2010
3/1/2010
3f 1 /2010
3/1l2010
3/1l2010
3/1l2010
3/1/2010
3/1 /201 U
3/1l2010
3/1/2010
3/1/2Q10
3/1l2010
3/1/2010
3/1/2010
3/1/2010
3/1/2010
3/1/2010
3/1/2010
3/1/2010
3/1/2010
3/1/2010
3/1/2010
3/1/2010
3!1/2010
3/1/2010
2/19/2010
2l19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19l2010
2/19l2010
2/19l2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2J19/2010
u�sizoio
2/19/2010
vis�2oio
2/19/20T0
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
2/19/2010
I nvoice
PWTR 2010 2
PWTR 2010 2
PVVTR 2010 2
PWTR 2010 2
PWTR 2010 2
PWTR 2010 2
PWiR 2010 2
PWTR 2010 2
PWfR 2010 2
PWTR 2010 2
PVVTR 2010 2
PWTR 2010 2
PWTR 2010 2
PWTR 2010 2
PWTR 2010 2
PWTR 2010 2
PWfR 2010 2
PWtR 2010 2
PWTR 2010 2
PWTR 2010 2
PWTR 201U 2
PWTR 2010 2
PWiR 2010 2
PWfR 2010 2
PWTR 2010 2
PWfR 2010 2
PWiR 2010 2
PWTR 2010 2
PWfR 2010 2
PWfR 2010 2
PWiR 2Q10 2
PWfR 2010 2
PARKS 201Q 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 OZ
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
PARKS 2010 02
Description
PWTR-02/10 2510 S 336TH ST-
PWTR-02/10 2510 SW 336TH STREE
PWTR-02/10 2613 S 275TH PLACE
PWTR-02/10 28516 24TH AVE S-
PWTR-02/10 29600 PAC HWY S SIG
PWTR-02/10 2999 SW 314TH ST-
PWTR-OZ/10 30400TH PAC HWY S-
PWTR-02/10 30800 PAC HWY S-
PI/VTR-02/10 31020 14TH AVE S-
PWTR-02l10 3113 27TH AVE SW-
PWTR-02/70 31200 STATE RT 99 S
PWfR-02/10 31455 28TH AVE S-
PWTR-OZ/10 31600 STATE RT 99 S
PWTR-OZl10 31847 PAC HWY S-
PV1/fR-OZ/10 31910 GATEWAY CNTR
PWTR-02/10 32000 PAC HWY S-
PWfR-02/10 32400 STATE RT 99 N
PWTR-02/10 32400 STATE RT 99 S
PWTR-02/10 32400 STATE RT 99 S
PWTR-02/10 32562 SW HOYT RD FL
PWiR-02/10 32731 HOYT RD FLASH
PWfR-02/10 32932 7TH CT SV1F-
PWTR-OZ/10 33099 HOYT RD SVN-
PWfR-02/10 3318 SW 346TH PLACE
PWTR-02/10 33220 ST WAY S-
PWiR-02H0 33325 8TH AVE-
PWTR-02/10 33401 38TH AVE S-
PWTR-02/10 33405 6TH AVE S-
PWfR-02/10 33507 9TH AVE-
PWfR-02l10 33645 20TH PLACE-
PWfR-02/10 33800 WEYHR WAY S-
PWTR-02/10 34010 20TH AVE-
PKF-02/10 SAC PARK RR FIELD LI
PKF-02/10 1STAVE & CAMPUS DR.
PKM-02/10 2410 S 312TH BEACH R
PKM-02/10 2410 S 312TH STORAGE
PKM-OZ/10 2410 S 312TH WOODSHO
PKF-02/10 2645 S 312TH ANX-RR/
PKF-OZ/10 2645 S 312TH SEWER L
PKF-02/10 2700 SW 340TH ALDERD
PKF-02/10 28156 1/2 24TH HERIT
PKF-02/10 31104 28TH AVE S HAU
PKF-02/10 31104 28TM AVE S HAU
PKM-02/10 31132 28TH AVE STLK
PKM-02/10 31132 28TH AVE S STL
PKM-02/10 31207 28TH AVE SKATE
DBClKFT-02/10 3200 SW DASH PT
DBC/KFT-02/10 3200 SW DASH PT
DBC/KFT-02/10 3200 SW DASH PT
DBC/KFT-02/10 3200 SW DASH PT
PKF-02/10 32730 17TH AVE SW AL
CHB-02/10 33325 8TH AVE Z00453
PKF-02/10 33914 19TH AVE SAG F
PKF-02/10 34915 4TH AVE MARKX
PKF-02/10 34915 4TH AVE S PALI
PKF-OZ/10 600 S 333RD EVID. BL
PKF-02/10 600 S 333RD EVID BLD
FWCC-02/10 876 S 333RD Z002806
FWCC-02/10 876 S 333RD 0008456
FWCC-02/10 876 S 333RD ST. LIG
PKCP-02/10 S 324TH BLDG A-
PKCP-02/10 S 324TH BLDG B-
PKF-02/10 7TH AVE HISTORICAL S
PKF-02/10 7TH AVE HISTORICAL S
Page 28 of 36
Amount Check Total
40.64
10.00
36.80
28.20
640.31
122.51
62.66
60.94
53.47
149.49
561.61
129.02
134.47
372.70
20.73
428.15
131.12
449.01
160.90
10.19
10.47
21.01
412.23
43.60
51.55
190.19
254.64
60.65
148.65
371.94
371.45
179.48
1,593.84
42.65
408.32
11.63
140.11
1,479.37
12.86
10.00
70.00
ai.��
52.01
423.63
605.51
�o.00
1,563.16
769.92
1,819.73
896.28
10.00
15,847.44
2,818.25
12.23
10.00
ns.n
552.21
16,258.73
13,008.00
119.44
441.06
835.83
29.93
8.07
Bank of America
Check No. Date
216236 3/15/2010
Vendor Inv Date Invoice
2/19/2010 PARKS 2010 02
2l19/2010 PARKS 2010 02
3/1l2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PN/TR 2010 2
3J1f2010 PWTR 2010 2
3!1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWfR 2010 2
3/1I2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1I2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/7/2010 PWfR 2010 2
3/1/20'10 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWfR 2010 2
3/1l2010 PWfR 2010 2
3/1l2010 PWTR 2010 2
3!1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3!1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1l2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3!1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWfR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWfR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 Z
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3!1/2010 PWTR 201Q 2
3/1/2010 PWfR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWfR 2010 2
3!1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWfR 2010 2
3/1l2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWfR 2010 2
311/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWl'R 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWfR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWTR 2010 2
3/1/2010 PWfR20102
008649 QUALITY WATER SERVICES,
2/28/2010 68482
216237 3/15/2010 000202 QWEST,
216238 3/15/2010
216239 3/15l2010
216240 3/15/2010
216241 3/15/2010
3!4/2010 206-Z040609 4726
3/4/2010 206-Z040609 472B
3/4/2010 206-Z04-0609 4726
010187 RASOR, EVA EDLA
3/2/2010 fEBRUARY 2010
001139 RED WING SHOE STORE,
2l24l2010 00887003187
011455 ROZ TUNER & ASSOCIATES,
2/20/2010 FEBRUARY 20, 2010
005508 SAFAROVA-DOWNEY, ALMIRA
2/16/2010 02/16/10
7/19/2010 02/19/10
2/17l2010 OZ/17/10
2/23l2010 OZ/23/10
2/26/2010 02/26l10
3/2/2010 03/OZl10
Description
PKF-02/10 21ST AVE LAKOTA RR B
PKF-02l10 2410 S 312TH STLK ST
PWTR-02/10 34018 PAC HWY S-
PWTR-02/10 3420 SW 343RD ST-
P1NtR-02/10 34800 21ST AVE SW-
PWTR-02/10 34836 WEYHR WAY S-
PWTR-02/10 34801 16TH AVE S-
PVY�R-02/10 35007 ENCHANTED PKW
PWTR-02/10 35106 21 ST AVE SW-
PWTR-02/10 35202 ENCHANT PKWY-
PWTR-OZ/10 35505 PAC HWY S-
PWTR-02/10 35654 9TN AVE SW-
PWTR-02/10 35896 PAC HWY S-
PWTR-02/10 35909 1ST AVE SW FL
PWfR-02/10 36111 16TH AVE S-
PWfR-02/10 36201 MILTON RD-
PWTR-02/10 36600 PAC HWY S-
PWTR-02/10 491 S 338TH ST-
PWTR-02/10 727 S 312TH ST-
PWfR-02/10 8TH AVE S 8 DASH PT
PWfR-02/10 824 SW 361TH ST-
PWiR-02/10 S 322N ST & 23 AVE
PWfR-02H0 HWY 509 & 21ST AVE
PWTR-02/10 NE CRNR S 312TH & 2
PWfR-02/10 S 304TH & MILITARY
PWTR-02/10 S 312TH & 23 AVE S-
PWfR-02/10 S 314TH & 20TH AVE
PWTR-OZ/10 S 320 SET & 32RD AV
PWfR-02/10 S 320TH 8 PAC HWY S
PWfR-02/10 S 320TH & WEYHR WAY
PWT'R-02/10 S 336TH ST & WEYHR
PV1/TR-02/10 S 348TH ST & PAC HW
PWTR-02/10 S 316TH & 20TH AVE
PWTR-02/10 SR 161 & 356TH NE C
PWTR-02/10 STAR LK RD & MILITA
PWTR-02/10 SW CAMPUS DR & 6TH
PWTR-02/10 SW 308TH ST & 4 AVE
PVYTR-02/10 SW 312TH ST & DASH
PWfR-02/10 SW 324TH & 11TH PL
PWTR-02/10 SW 340TH & HOYT RD
PWiR-02/10 SW 340TH ST & 35TH
PWTR-02/10 21 ST AVE SW 8 DASH
PWTR-02/10 S 333ST & 1ST WAY-
PWiR-02/10 S 348TH HOV LANE-
DBC-WATER COOLER RENTAL
IT-03l10 PHONE/DATA SVC
IT-03/10 PHONElDATA SVC
IT-03/10 PHONE/DATA SVC
fWCC-AG07-095 EXERCISE TRAININ
PKM-WORK BOOTS PER UNION CONTR
LAW-AG09-061 EXECUTIVE COACHIN
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
MGINTERPRETER SVCS
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
Amount
237.87
23.17
77.03
38.25
132.43
82.10
132.84
209.64
60.84
368.10
439.82
26.75
95.47
10.19
143.24
249.57
10.29
78.94
268.04
68.60
276.66
111.58
30.19
260.2(1
95.21
262.30
164.15
347.99
741.43
350.69
212.13
279.05
89.48
328.84
52.76
75.12
10.00
152.28
302.23
254.44
87.57
96.17
82.85
358.62
Page 29 of 36
Check Total
27.32
27.32
2,260.94
1,130.47
1,017.42
113.05
i,zoo.00
1,200.00
158.21
158.21
1,093.75
1,093.75
650.00
125.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
125.00
Bank of America Page 30 of 36
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
216242 3/15l2010 003726 SAFEWAY STORE #1555, 133.45
2/25/2010 1841273 PRCS-DISCOVERY KIDS SUPPLIES 23.34
2/12/2010 1841263 PRCS-DAUGHTER'S NIGHT OUT SUPP 110.11
216243 3/15/2010 003174 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIPMENT CO, 12,838.44
2/5/2010 591723 PD-POLICE AMMUNITION SUPPLY- 12,838.44
216244 3/15/2010 010523 SBS OF AMERICA, 4,000.00
3/1/2010 2428& PARK-AG07-194 CHB JANITORIAL S 3,850.00
3/tl2010 24288 PARK-AG07-194 PKM JANITORIAL S 150.00
216245 3/15/2010 006418 SCHROCK, CATHY 1,140.00
2/25/2010 SCHROCK 2010 HR-TUITION REIMB C SCHROCK 1,140.00
216246 3/15/2010 001213 SECOMA FENCE INC, 824.88
2/T7/2010 7804 PKM-FENCE REPAIR MATERIALS/INV 66.92
2/18/2010 7805 PKM- SUPPLIESlLABOR TO REPAIR 757.96
216247 3l15I2010 010962 SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEMS, 20.54
2/24/2010 00020602 IT-PK-COPIER RPR, MNT, SUP 20.54
216248 3/15l2010 010652 SHINN, BONNIE 154.62
2/23/2010 2009 SHINN CM-2009 UTILITY TAX 154.62
216249 3/15/2010 002501 SHOPE CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO INC, 1,923.83
2/11l2010 9920558 SWM-OVERLAY REBUILDS 1,923.83
216250 3H5l2010 001014 SKCSRA-SOCCERREFEREESASSOC, 5,220.00
3/1l2010 MARCH 1, 2010 PRCS-SOCCER REFEREE SERVICES 400.00
3!1/2010 MARCH 1, 2010 A PRCS-SOCCER REFEREE SERVICES 7,780.00
3/1/2010 MARCH 1, 2010 B PRCS-SOCCER REFEREE SERVICES 1,250.00
2/15/2010 FEBRUARY 15, 2010 PRCS-SOCCER REFEREE SERVICES 1,790.00
216251 3l15/2010 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 7,070.94
2/15/2010 330747 PRCS-2010 SPRING BROCHURE PRIN 7,070.94
216252 3/15/2010 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 455.23
2/20/2010 329893 HRCK-ORDS #10-642-644 LEGAL NO 66.33
2/6l2010 321850 HRCK-MAYOR SALARY LEGAL NOTICE 207.64
2/6/201� 326455 HRCK-ORD. #10-641 LEGAL NOTICE 43.26
2/3/2010 297811 MSC-02l10 MIRROR WEB AD AG09-2 138.00
216253 3/15/2010 004963 SOUND PUBL�SHING INC, 164.38
2/3/2010 322860 CDW-PLANNING COMM. �EGAL NOTI 74.98
2/24/2010 330897 CDLU-COMP. PLAN LEGAL NOTICE 89.40
216254 3/15/2010 000285 SOUTH KING FIRE 8 RESCUE, 200.00
3/2/2010 PKM FIRE PERMIT PKM-FLAMMABLE MATERIALS PERMIT 200.00
216255 3/15/2010 004910 SPACESAVER NORTHWEST, 559.34
2/17/2010 11591 CD-LASER PR�NT COLOR-CODED LAB 559.34
216256 3/15/2010 001885 SPARKS CAR CARE, 609.75
2/19/2010 25481 PD-ELECTRICAL WORK 41.71
2/19/2010 25481 PD-WIPER BLADES 22.32
2/19/2010 25481 PD-LOF 39.68
2/23/2010 25496 PD-ELECTRICAL WORK 32.85
2l22/2010 25490 PD-LOF 34.99
2/22/2010 25490 PD-ELECTRICAL WORK 21.68
7/22/2010 25490 PD-TIRES 2$•47
2/18/2010 25472 PD-ELECTRICAL WORK 85.11
2/18/2010 25472 PD-WIPER BLADES 8.76
2/18/2010 25472 PD-TIRE REPAIR 21.90
2/18/2010 25472 PD-LOF 77•35
3/2/2010 25526 PD-TIRES 56.94
3/2/2010 25538 PD-ELECTRICAL WORK 52.56
3/1/2010 25528 PD-TIRES 14.24
3/1/2010 25529 PD-TIRES 14•24
3/1/2010 25530 PD-TIRES 14.24
3/1/2010 25531 PD-SPARE TIRES IN SHED 42.71
216257 3H5/2010 001618 SPEEDY GLASS - TACOMA, 437.20
12/15/2009 9172-605281 PD-VEHICLE WINDSHIELD REPAIR 437.20
216258 3/15/2010 003600 SPILLMAN TECHNOLOGtES INC, 37,746.21
1/6/2010 19517T PD- PROPERTY EVIDENCE MODULE 543.12
1/6/2010 19517T PD -MAIN HUB MAINTENANCE 16,299.08
1/6/2010 19517T PD- LICENCES/ PERMITS MAINTENA 543.12
Bank of America
Check No. Date Vendor
216259 3/15/2010 004701 SPRINT,
216260 3J15/2010
216261 3/15/2010
216262 3/15/2010
216263 3/15/2010
216264 3/15/2010
216265 3/15/2010
216266 3/15/2010
216267 3/15/2010
fnv Date
1 f6/2010
1!6/2010
1/6/2010
1 /6/2010
1/6/2010
1!6l2010
1/6/2010
t /6/2010
1/6/2Q10
3/10/2010
3/10/2010
19517T
19517T
19517T
19517T
19517T
19517T
19517T
19517T
19517T
18216T
19581A
Invoice Description
PD- PERSONAL MANAGEMENT MAINTE
PD- RECORDS MANAGEMENT MODULE
PD- TRAFFIC INFO MODULE MAINTE
PD STATE LINK MODULE MAINTENAN
PD- PRC CAD MODULE MAINTENANCE
PD- FINGERPRINT MODULE MAINTE
PD- SUMMIT IMAGING/SOFTWARE MA
PD-EVIDENCE BARCODE INTERFACE
PD- EVIDENCE AUDIT INTERFACE M
1T-P0 060109 ANNUAL MAINT. TAX
PD-NIBRS INVOICE TAX DUE. INV
2l18/2010 796588811-027
2/18/2010 796588811-027
2/28/2010 400102318-099
2/28/2010 400102318-099
011454 STAPLES ADVANTAGE,
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 10Q936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2l28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
Z/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2128/20'10 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28l2010 100936404
Z/28l2010 100936404
2/28l2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/201� 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
2/28/2010 100936404
009566 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE,
2/27/2010 8014873172
2/27/2010 8014873172
011134 STENDER ZUMWALT, PLLC,
3/1/2010 143
004200 STIEBEN, JOHN
2/2/2010 STIEBEN 2010
003896 SUMMIT LAW GROUP,
2/12/2010 45193
007710 SUPERIOR LINEN SERVICE,
2/22/2010 46947
3!1/2010 48950
002521 SUPERLON PLASTICS WC,
1/27/2010 10F0245
2/12/2010 10F0435
011950 SVYATKOVSKY, MIKHAIL
IT-MM/YY DATA CELLULAR
IT-MM/YY DATA CELLULAR
IT-2/10 CELLULAR AIRTIME
IT-2/10 CELLULAR AIRTtME
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2U10 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FE8 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
FEB 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES - STA
PD-OZ/10 OFFICE SUPPLIES-STAPL
PD-02/10 OFFICE SUPPLIES-STAPL
CM-AG08-159 PUBLIC DEFENDER-
PD-CALEA CONF. STIEBEN
LAW-AG08-130 GUILD NEGOTIATION
DBGLINEN SERVICE
DBGLINEN SERVICE
PKM-PARTS TO REPAIR SEWER LINE
SWM-PIPE/IRRIGATION SUPPLIES F
Amount
1, 357.80
905.57
960.32
2,26227
4,265.02
1,381.89
7,493.08
552.97
552.97
421.00
208.00
2,743.46
84.85
2,942.80
3,188.03
88.84
175.95
12.88
145.49
286.24
79.73
128.36
161.80
80.62
211.00
71.68
29.72
39.63
122.52
65.34
9.91
126.33
55.89
63.42
74.02
1,093.88
592.17
71.87
70.19
32.90
22.15
76.97
48.63
35.76
5.94
Page 31 of 36
Check Total
8,959.14
4,079.83
216.82
127.03
89.79
30,127.50
30,127.50
200.00
200.00
952.00
952.00
80.10
30.05
30.05
551.66
442.85
108.81
123.86
Bank of America Page 32 of 36
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
2/23/2010 2009 SVYATKOVSKY CM-2009 UTILITY TAX 123.86
216268 3/15/2010 009523 SYSTEMS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY, 2,358.92
3/2/2010 13602 PD-RACK & PINION REPAIR 684.26
3/2/2010 13617 PD-TRANSMISSION REPAIR 351.89
2/26/2010 13582 PD-REPAIR WIRING TO LICENSE PL 43.16
2/26/2010 13599 PD-TEST OPTICOM 43.16
2/26/2010 13613 PD-DEFROST FUSE, HEADLIGHT SWI 117.56
2/25l2010 136t2 PD-HEADLIGHT, SERPENTINE BELT 195.37
2/22/2010 13564 PD-CLEAN MAF INTAKE/INJECTORS 174.17
2/22/2010 13575 PD-REPLC WINDOW SWITCH 114.97
2/22l2010 13576 PD-ADJUST HEADLIGHTS 41.10
2/25l2010 13595 PD-REPLC COMPRESSOR RELAY 205.48
2/24/2010 13604 PD-SAFETY INSPECTION 41.10
2/18l2010 13518 PD-INSTALL RECEIVER HITCHES 346.70
216269 3/15/2010 007756 TAB PRODUCTS CO LLC, 358.74
2/5/2010 1888383 PD-01/10 BOX STORAGE 358.74
216270 3l15l2010 OOO5S8 TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES, 431.62
3/12/2010 100048250 DBC-02/16 DASH PT. RD�- 289.19
3/12/2010 100048250 DBC-2/10 CENTERSTAGE WATER USA 142.43
216271 3l15/201d 006033 THE FAB SHOP LLC, 1,055.75
3/3/2010 15272 PWFLT-TRAILER WHEEL 8 TIRE 275.96
3/3/2010 15272 PWFLT-TRAILER WHEEL & TIRE -275.96
3/3/2010 15271 PWFLT-DOT INSPECTION 779.79
3!3/2010 15272 PWFLT-TRAILER WHEEL 8 TIRE 275.96
216272 3/15/2010 003088 THE PART WORKS INC, 297.40
2/19l2010 277545 CH&FAUCET PARTS 185.67
2/16/2�10 277238 PKM-URINAL VALVE ACCESSORY/INV 111.73
216273 3/15/2010 700933 THE PEP BOYS, 500.00
2/25/2010 02-39691 REFUND CD-02-39691 PEP BOYS BOND REFU 500.00
216274 3/15/2010 011186 THE WIDE FORMAT COMPANY, 223.54
3/2/2010 42041 IT-02/10 KIP SCANNER MAINT 223.54
216275 3/15/2010 001424 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR INC, 400.30
3/1/2010 444108 CHB-03/10 ELEVATOR MAINT SVCS 200.15
2/1/2010 410106 CHB-02/10 ELEVATOR MAINT SVCS 200.15
216276 3/15l2�10 004218 TIMCOINC,
2l25l2010 196395
2/19/2010 196169
216277 3/15/2010 005483 TOMARK SPORTS INC,
2/15/2010 93413646
2/15/2010 93413646
216278 3/15/201� 008902 TRI-CITY MEATS,
2/24l2010 232194
216279 3/15/2010 002426 UNITED GROCERS CASH & CARRY,
2/24/2010 141448
2/26/2010 141983
2/25l2010 141867
2/25/2010 141868
2/27/2010 142544
2/21/2010 140719
2/20/2010 140406
2/20/2010 140608
2/19/2010 140283
2/23/2010 141243
2/22/2010 140950
2/18/2010 139805
2/18/2010 139928
216280 3/15/2010 004470 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA,
2/4/2010 0295965-WA
216281 3/15/2010 001805 VADIS NORTHWEST,
2l28/2010 16860
vzaizoio �saso
216282 3/15/2010 004552 VALLEY CITIES COUNSELING,
2/12/2010 VCC MARCH 2O10
SWM-1/4 TANK VALVE
PKM-GREASE WHIP AND AIR HOSE/I
PKM-BASE RUNNER RAKES AND MEAS
PKM-BASE RUNNER RAKES AND MEAS
DBC-MEAT FOR CATERING SVC
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBGCATERING SUPPLIES
PRCS-COOKING CLASS SUPPLIES
DBGCATERING SUPPLIES
PRCS-SPECIAL OLYMPICS SUPPLIES
DBGCATERING SUPPLIES
DBGCATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBGCATERING SUPPLIES
DBGCATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
PRCS-COOKING CLASS SUPPLIES
HR-DOT EXAM G NEIFFER
SWR-AG07-016 2l10 LITTER CONTR
SWR-AG07-016 2/10 LITTER CONTR
CM - VALLEY CITIES COUNSEL�NG
55.76
12.14
43.62
1,004.39
500.00
504.39
191.26
191.26
637.30
44.56
11.61
33.06
41.49
11.68
46.08
66.27
81.17
23:65
52.80
113.75
73.35
37.83
67.00
67.00
4,295.00
4,166.15
128.85
1,250.00
1,250.00
Bank of America
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice
216283 3/15l2010 003563 VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER,
2/22/2010 0010846
216284 3/15/2010 011527 VAN SICKEL, MARY
3/4/2010 2009 VAN SICKEL
216285 3/15/2010 001124 VERIZON WIRELESS,
2/13/2010 0842439331
2/12/2010 0842439331
2/12/2010 0842439331
216286 3J15/2010 004258 WA STATE DEPT OF LICENSING,
3/10/2010 MARCH 15, 2010
3/10l2010 MARCH 15, 2010
3/10/2010 MARCH 15, 2010
216287 3/15/2010 003825 WA STATE DEPT OF TRANSPORTATN,
2/9/2010 RE41JA5897L016
216288 3/15/2010 000340 WA STATE INFORMATION SERVICES,
2/28/2010 2010020183
2/28/2010 2010020183
2/28/2010 2010020183
216289 3/15l2010 002275 WA STATE LABOR & INDUSTRIES,
2/23/2010 196013
216290 3/15/2010 011640 WA STATE REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
2/26/2010 02-33173 REFUND
216291 3/15/2010 000514 WA STATE-STATE REVENUES,
3/9/2010 FEB 2010
3!9/2010 fEB 2010
3/9/2010 FEB 2010
3/9/2010 FEB 2010
3/9/2010 FEB 2010
3!9/2010 FEB 2010
3/9/2010 FEB 2010
3/9l201� FEB 2010
3/9/2010 FEB 2010
216292 3/15/2010 008646 WASHINCaTON WORKWEAR LLC,
2/12/2010 673
2/12/2010 674
2/5/2010 670
2/5/2010 671
2/1/2010 668
2/1/2010 669
216293 3/15/2019 000732 WASPC-WA ASSOC SHERIfFS &,
1/31l2010 DUES 2009-00513
216294 3/15/2010 000783 WASTE MANAGEMENT,
3/1/2010 098143&1055-8
216295 3/15/2010 000783 WASTE MANAGEMENT,
3/1/2010 0980744-1055-1
216296 3/15/2010 009995 WATER MANAGEMENT,
2/19/2010 88431
216297 3/15/2010 000266 WCPDA-WASHINGTON CITY PLANNING,
3/2/2010 WCPDA 2010
216298 3/15/2010 003500 WESCOM COMMUNICATIONS,
2/19/2010 19981
2/19/2010 19882
2/16/2010 19952
2/16l2010 19953
216299 3/15/2010 003444 WEST CAMPUS CiEANERS,
3/9/2010 FEBRUARY 2010
216300 3H5l2010 000541 WESTERN EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS,
2/22/2010 623529
2/24/2010 62118$
2/24/2010 623792
2/24/2010 623800
216301 3/15/2010 011523 WHOLESALE SPORTS,
Description
PD-02/10 MDT USER FEE AG00-090
CM-2009 UTILITY TAX
IT/PD-01/10 BOMB SQUAD CELLULA
PD-01/10 BAIT CAR VVIRELESS
PD-01/10 BAIT CAR WIRELESS
PD-02/10 CPL FEES:
PD-12/09 CPL NEVIN POST TO ACC
PD-12l09 CPL NEVIN POST TO ACC
PWST-TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERIN
IT-02/10 SCAN SERVICE
IT-02/10 SCAN SERVICE
IT-OZ/10 SCAN SERVICE
PARKS-L&I BOlLER INSPECT PERMt
CD-02-33173 CHEVRON TO DOR LEV
FI-02/10 STATE PORTION REMIT F
FI-02/10 PSEA COURT FEES #2
FI-02/10 PSEA COURT FEES #3
FI-02/10 PSEA JIS FEES
FI-02/10 TRAUMA VICTIMS FEES
FI-02/10 SCHOOL ZONE SAFETY
FI-02/10 AUTO THEFT PREV.
FI-02/10 BRAIN TRAUMA INJ
FI-02/10 SBCC SURCHARGE FEES
SWM-BOOTS FOR RON SCOTT
SWM-CLOHTING FOR ERIC FOX
SWM-CLOTH�NG FOR ERIC FOX
SWM-CLOTHING FOR GARY NEIFFER
SWM-WATERPROOF PANTS FOR ERIC
SWM-WATERPROOF BLACK PANTS FOR
PD-WASPC 2010 DUES B. WILSON
SWR-02/10 LITTER DISPOSAL SVCS
SWR-2/10�/10 DISPOSAL SVCS
SWM-LABORATORY TESTING SERVICE
CDA- 2010 WCPDA MEMBERSHIP -
PD-RADAR REPAIR-WATER DAMAGED
PD-CALIBRATE RADAR SYSTEM
PD-CALIBRATE RADAR SYSTEM
PD-CALIBRATE RADAR SYSTEM
PD-AG07-135 DRY CLEANING SVCS-
PWFLT-FUEL PILTERS
PWFLT-WINTER SERVICElMAINT
PWFLT-RAKE PRONG
PWFLT-20" BLADE
Page 33 of 36
Amount Check Total
1,020.00
1,020.00
205.75
205.75
173.84
65.61
38.04
70.19
564.00
564.00
8.44
-8.44
144.32
144.32
755.27
332.32
377.64
45.31
70.70
70.70
500.00
500.00
142,984.34
63, 379.80
32,365.41
416.51
24,487.15
6,341.00
1,903.04
12,092.65
1,863J8
135.00
731.38
177.38
51.45
73.90
73.90
241.43
113.32
425.00
425.00
393.68
393.68
21.45
21.45
132.00
132.00
50.00
50:00
990.98
657.00
98.55
136.88
98:55
1,061.87
1,061.87
4,493.44
84.25
4,176.06
62.09
171.04
196.13
Bank of America
Check No. Date
216302 3/15/2010
216303 3/15/2010
Vendor Inv Date Invoice
2/3/2010 150-00025
2/18/2010 150-00027
000660 WOODWORTH & COMPANY INC,
1/26/2010 201092
2/23/2010 201570
2/16/2010 201404
2l16/2010 201404
000694 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE COMPANY,
3/1/2010 68144476
21Q3793 3/4/2010 009467 US BANK,
2104759 3/2/2010 009507 US BANK
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2J25l2010
2l25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25l2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/201 �
2/25/2010
Zl25/2010
vasi2o� o
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
u2sizoio
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2l25/2010
2l25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2�10
2/25l2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2�10
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRt1ARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 201�
FEBRUARY 201�
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY2010
FEBRUARY2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
fEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
fEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
fEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
fEBRUARY 2010
Description
SWM-WORK CLOTHING FOR MICHAEL
SWM-BIBS FOR MIKE SWENSON
PKM-STEEL LAKE PARK ROAD
SWM-ASPHALT MIX
PWST/SWM-ASPHALT MIX
PWST/SWM-ASPHALT MIX
PKM-SAFETY KIT SUPPLIES/INV#68
PD-INTERVIEW TECH. REGO COFFEY
PD-NOTARY SMNR L. ALLEN
PD-VERBAI JUDO TRNG 4 STAFF ME
PD-NOTARY SMNR G. SUND
PD-CRASH INVEST. TRNG R POTTS
P0.LEADERSHIP TRNG ROOM RENT
PD-CALEA CQNF. STIEBEN S JACKS
PD-CRASH INVEST. CONF LEFEBVRE
PD-LEA DATA SOFTWARE CREDIT
PD-SNIPERWEEK 3 STAFF MEMBERS
PD-HAZARD. DEVICES CERT C MART
PD-ANIMAL SVCS OFFICER JOB AD
PD-COMMUNICATIONING TRNG OVERL
PD-RECORDS MGMT TRNG OVERLEASE
PD-AIRSOFT TRNG SUPPLIES
PD-FIREARMS TRAINING VIDEOS
PD-HANDGUN TRNG DVD SET
PD-SHOTGUN INSTRUCTOR TRNG HOW
PD-SEIZURE ASSET FORFEITURE TR
PD-SNIPERCRAFT TRNG BERTUCCI C
PD-SNIPERCRAFT TRNG BERTUCCI C
PD-SNIPERCRAFT TRNG BERTUCCI C
PD-CAFE PAPER HOT CUPS
PD-EXPLORER GRAND PRIX EVENT
PD-TRAFFIC CONES
PD-DT INSTRUCTOR SHIRTS
PD-DT INSTRUCTOR SHIRTS
PD-INVERTER POWER SVIATCHES
PD-POWER INVERTER
PD-DT TRNG MATERIAL
PD-JUMPER CABLES 8 OIL
PD-BATTERY CABLE
PD-POVNER CONVERTER
PD-WELDING CABLE FOR INVERTER
PD-CAMERA BATTERY
FI-LEADERSHIP CONF. KRAUS HORT
IT-CAVIAR BLUE HD
FWCC-STARTRACK BIKE REPAIR
PRCS-SNOW SLEDDING TRIP
PRCS-DAY CAMP SUPPLIES
PRCS-CLEANING SUPPLIES
FWCC-SIGN HOLDERS
FWCC-JUMP ROPES
FWCGGROUP POWER LICENSES
PRCS-DINNER & A MOVIE
PRCS-BRUNCH & A MOVIE
FWCC-WAX PAPER - KID ESCAPE
fWCGKID ESCAPE SUPPLIES
PRCS-SPRINGBOARD MATS
FWCC-SL PAT'S DASH ENTRY FEE
PRCS-DAUGHTER'S NIGHT OUT SUPP
PRCS-DAUGHTER'S NIGHT OUT SUPP
PRCS-FERRY TOLL VASHON TRIP
Page 34 of 36
Amount Check Total
98.54
97.59
741.75
153.85
149.39
259.39
179.12
59.50
59.50
8,861.01
198.00
125.00
495.00
125.00
211.20
178.71
990.00
25.00
-60.00
211.68
25.00
40.00
136.00
30.00
28.97
35.90
51.15
819.49
506.18
765.60
63.00
591.29
413.36
1,554.48
49.50
123.66
24.75
46.97
601.14
211.25
31.80
22.21
80.20
86.53
22.99
140.00
77.41
586.94
21.00
33.26
98.34
56.18
31.27
630.00
30.00
16.00
22.71
523
265.99
275.40
31.50
118.06
39.35
6,965.87
Bank of America
Check No. Date Vendor
2109491 3/5/2010 011218 US BANK,
Inv Date
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25l2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25l2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25l2010
2/25/2010
v2si2oTo
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2l25/2010
2/25/2Q10
2/25/2010
2/25l2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2l25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25l2010
v2sizo� o
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25/2010
2/25l2010
2/25/2010
Invoic
FEBRUARY2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY2010
FEBRUARY2010
FEBRUARY2010
FEBRUARY2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY2010
FEBRUARY2�10
FEBRUARY 201�
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 201 U
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
fEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY2010
FEBRUARY2010
fEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
fEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY2010
FEBRUARY 2010
FEBRUARY 2010
PRCS-VASHON SENIOR TRIP
PRCS-VASHON SENIOR TRIP
PRCS-VASHON SENIOR TRIP
FWCC-SIGN HOLDERS
PRCS-YOUTH COMMISSION MTG
PRCS-BRUNCH & A MOVIE
PRCS-SENIOR WINTER WALKS TRIP
FWCC-AV NOW SHIPPING CHG
CC-NATL LEAGUE OF CITIES TRIP
MC-2/10 LANGUAGE LINE USAGE
FWCC-BIRTHDAY PARTY FAVORS
FWCGKID'S ESCAPE FOOD
PRCS-GAME FARM SR TRIP
PRCS-GAME FARM SR TRIP
PRCS-GAME FARM SR TRIP BRIDGE
PRCS-MYSTERY TRIP MEAL
CC-2/10 LUNCH WILSON/KOCHMAR M
PWTR-LIGHT BRIGADE TRNG HANNAH
PWAD-SAFETY BOOTS K MILLER
PWST-ASCE DUES RENEW SALLOUM
PWST-WA ENG. LICENSE RENEW SAL
PW-PH IV MGMT INTERVIEWS
LAW-MICCICHE WARRANT FILING FE
CDHS-POWER OF POSSIBILITIES BO
PKM-TREE RISK TRNG T DICKINSON
CHB-LOCK OUT TAGS
CHB-CHILD PROOF LATCHES
PKM-LITTER PICKERS
PKM-SOCCER, TENNIS, VBALL NETS
PWEOC-QUICK RESPONSE KIT
PWEOC-OPEN BROKEN SAFE
PWEOC-CERT TRNG COURSE SUPPLIE
PWEOC-VEST FOR CERT COURSE
PWEOGEMERG. PREPAREDNESS CONF
CD-COUNCIL RETREAT LUNCH
CC-COFFEE FOR COUNCIL RETREAT
CC-COUNCIL DINNER 2/2/10
CC-AGENDA SETTiNG LUNCH
CM-TOURISM NETWORKING MTG DOHE
CM-2/19l10 DEPOSITIONS
CC-AGENDA SETTING LUNCH
CM-COURT BUSINESS MTG
SWM-SCREWS & BOLTS
CD-APA DUES - R BAKER
CD-IAEI DUES WILSON
CD-ICC CITY DUES
CD-WABO TRAINING - STAFF
CD-WABO CITY DUES
CD-WABO DUES WILSON
CD-IAEI DUES SZPEK
CD-WABO CODE UPDATE TRNG KEIRS
CD-APA DUES CONLEN
CD-GRAFFITI SUPPLIES
CD-APA CONF. LEE BAILEY
CD-APA CONF. LEE BAILEY
CD-PASSPORT MAILING COST
CM-FW @ 20 CELEBRATION SUPPLIE
CM-FW @ 20 CELEBRATION SUPPLIE
CM-FW @ 20 CELEBRATION SUPPUE
CM-FW @ 20 GELEBRATION SUPPLIE
HR-MINOR WORK PERMIT CHB/FWCC
HR-SUPERVISOR TRN CONF STANLEY
HR-CERTIFICATE PAPER
Amount
32.75
18.98
14.54
23.94
85.14
28.00
31.82
9.75
1,906.20
15.80
336.25
122.30
20.00
190.00
8.00
34.43
42.04
860.00
82.80
235.00
116.00
41.00
232.49
35.13
500.00
134.80
3.80
365.48
3,333.58
392.00
448.00
202.05
315.15
250.00
306.13
26.40
116.42
62.83
25.00
31.44
66.00
31.63
10.26
230.00
102.00
100.00
750.00
150.00
35.00
102.00
300.00
305.00
32.74
855.00
150.00
212.22
3.78
�o:sa
69.91
512.93
18.00
140:00
69.40
Page 35 of 36
Check Total
11,612.86
B of America
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice
2l25/2010 FEBRUARY 2010
2/25/2010 FEBRUARY 2010
2/25/2010 FEBRUARY 2�10
2/25/2010 FEBRUARY 2010
292493253/11l2010 000061 WA STATE REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
3/12/2010 601-223-5385
3/12/2010 601-223-5385
3/12/2010 601-223-5385
3/12l2010 601-223-5385
3/12/2010 601-223-5385
3/12/2010 601-223-5385
3/12/2010 601-223-5385
3/12l2010 601-223-5385
3/12l2010 601-223-5385
3/12/2010 601-223-5385
Description
SWM-ROOT DIP/SOIL MOIST
PKM-SONOTUBE-CARETAKER HOUSE
PKM-POST BRACKETS CARETAKER HO
PKM-NPSI PLYGRND TRNG HIGGINS
FI-02/10 REMIT USE TAX
FI-OZ/10 REMIT SALES TAX
FI-02/10 REMIT SALES TAX
FI-02/10 REMIT SALES TAX-FWCC
FI-02/10 REMIT SALES TAX DBC
FI-02/10 REMIT SALES TAX FWCC
FI-02/1� REMIT SVC TAX/PW STOR
FI-02/10 REMIT SALES TAX DBC
FI-02/10 REMIT SALES TAX DBC
FI-02/10 REMIT EXC TAX (ROUNDI
Page 36 of 36
Amount Check Total
127.89
62.83
137.12
480.00
13,552.13
1,899.50
47.07
154.58
7,747.67
2,207.83
1,235.69
259.80
4,103.29
-4,103.29
-0.01
Total Checks luued 489 Total 52,252,447.38
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 6, 2010
ITEM #:
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
SUBJECT: FINDINGS, GOALS AND CONCLUSIONS FOR THE MEDICAL DEVICE COMMERCIALIZATION AND
INNOYATION INCUBATOR PRQJECT.
POLICY QUESTION: SHOULD THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING THE
COUNCIL'S FINDINGS, GOALS AND CONCLUSIONS FOR THE MEDICAL DEVICE COMMERCIALI2ATION AND
INNOVATION INCUBATOR PROJECT?
CITY CQUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
COMMITTEE FEDRAC
CATEGORY:
❑ Consent
❑ City Council Bvsiness
■
�/
Ordinance
Resolution
MEETING BATE: 3/23/1 O
❑ Public Hearing
0 Other
STAFF REPORT BY: Patricia Richardson City Attorney __ _ DEPT: Law
___.._......_..__.....-----._..._..._..._..__........_......._ ..................._.........._......._._........................._..............._�..............._ .......................................... __......._....._..._........_...._.......__......._._..............._......_..........._.__...._..._.._.._.__..._.._._.._....----
Attachments: Staff report and proposed resolution.
Options Considered: 1. Adogt the proposed resolution memorializing the findings, goals and conclusions
for the medical device commercialization and innovation incubator project.
2. Modify the proposed resolution memorializing the findings, goals and
conclusions for the medical device commercialization and innovation incubator
project.
BTAFF RECOMMENDATION: Option 1
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:� � �J/b .IJ�I�' APPROVAL:
Comm�ttee Council
Council
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: `7 move d�roval of Option " ��
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
� DENIED I reading
� TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED- 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION #
COIVIMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: 9�6�F MO'I'��M. � GL���V� � U�� 1•
i
.
.���,
.► .
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
DATE: MARCH 16, 2010
TO: CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
CC: BRIAN WILSON, CITY MANAGERIPOLICE CHIEF
PATRICK DOHERTY, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIREC�OR _
`
FROM: PATRICIA RICHARDSON, CITY ATTORNEY
SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH COUNCIL'S FINDINGS, GOALS AND CONCLUSIONS
REGARDING THE MEDICAL DEVICE COMMERCIALIZATION AND INNOVATIVE INCUBATOR
In 2009 the Ciry engaged enterpriseSeattle to survey the area health care providers regarding the
feasibility of a medical device incubator and the potential economic impacts to the Federal Way region
("Phase I'�. An Advisory Committee ("Committee'� was formed with representarives from the Chamber of
Commerce, St. Francis Hospital, Highline Community College, a private business, and the Ciry to review the
feasibility survey and make recommendations to the Ciry Council.
The findings and recommendation were presented on January 26, 2010 to the Financial Economic
Development/Regional Affairs Council Committee and to the full Council on February 2, 2010. Based upon
the findings, the Committee recommended that the City proceed to fund Phase II — the marketing and
developing the infrastructure for businesses to operate in the Federal Way Region. After listening to the
presentation and asking questions, the Ciry Council voted in a public meeting to authorize the City Manager
to enter into a contract with enterpriseSeattle in the amount of $240,000 for Phase II.
The intent of the proposed resolution is to memorialize the presentation and Council's discussion into
three distinct areas: (1) findings, (2) goals, and (3) conclusions.
K:\memo\2010\staff rpt med device incubator
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Councii of the City of Federal Way,
Washington, Establishing the City's Findings, Goals and Conclusions for
the Medical Device Commercialization and Innovation Incubator
Project.
WHEREAS, 35.21.703 of the Revised Code of Washington authorizes the City of Federal
Way (the "City") to engage in economic development programs and to contract with nonprofit
corporations relating to economic development; and
WHEREAS, the City's Comprehensive Plan, as required pursuant to the Growth
Management Act, envisions the City's participation in economic development as increasing the
number of jobs within the City; and
WHEREAS, enterpriseSeattle is a nonprofit corporation formed for the purpose of providing
assistance to cities in regards to economic development; and
WHEREAS, on July 7, 2009 the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a
contract with enterpriseSeattle for the purpose of conducting a feasibility study ta determine if there
was a demand within the City for medical device innovation, and;
WHEREAS, an Advisory Committee was formed for the purpose of discussing the feasibility
of the incubator, the necessary research, identifying partners to participate in the survey, and other
related items for the feasibility study; and
WHEREAS, on February 2, 2010 enterpriseSeattle presented its findings to the City Council
at a regularly scheduled Council meeting; and
WHEREAS, based upon the stated goal and findings of the feasibility study, the City Council
authorized the implementation phase for the medical device innovation economic development
Resolution No.10- Page 1 of 4
Rev 1/10
project ("Project"); and
WHEREAS, the State Senate proposed an appropriation of $100,OQ0, which the City must
match, to assist the City in its economic development efforts through the medical device innovation
project and/or business. The proposal remains in the pending State budget.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section I. Goal. The goal of the Project, consistent with the City's GMA Comprehensive
Plan and with RCW 35.21.703, is to position Federal Way as leader in the region for discovery and
commercialization of healthcare innovation occurring at the point-of care and in doing so
substantially increase the relative impartance of healthcare as a significant contributor to the City's
economy through job creation, job recruitment and growth in wages.
Section 2. Findin�s. The feasibility study revealed the following statistics:
A. Healthcare in the City of Federal Way is a growing sector where
approximately 280 firms provide more than 5,300 jobs thereby accounting
for 17% of citywide jobs in 2008.
B. The City's healt�care sector is primarily service-oriented and produced an
estimated $370 million in revenues in 2008.
C. Medical device and IT development offer high wages and have higher
multiplier effects than service-oriented medical jobs.
D: Local health care leaders suggest that innovations align with current and
future needs for cost sa.�ings and increased efficiency in health care
delivery.
Resolution No. I0- Page 2 of 4
Rev 1 / 10
E. While the medical device business would be located in Federal Way, it
will have the ability and technology to reach beyond the city Iimits to
achieve its commercial objectives.
Section 3. Implementation Phase of the Praject. The primary function of this phase will be
to establish a business and implementation plan, resulting in establishment of a private medical
incubator business, with viable and fundable innovations and ready for investor and subscriber
participation.
Section 4. Conclusions. The City Council of Federal Way concludes:
1. A fully functianal medical device innovation incubator business will
produce economic development benefits through the formation and
recruitment of new high-quality, family-wage jobs in Federal Way.
2. The creation of more jobs in Federal Way will help fulfill the Growth
Management Act mandated goals of achieving a greater housing jobs
balance in the City, thereby helping to reduce traffic congestion.
3. Through a potential relationship with Highline Community College and
its subsidiary Small Business Development Center, the medical device
innovation business has the potential to foster greater practical
relationships between the health-care business sector and higher
education in Federal Way.
Section 4. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution should be
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
Resolution No.10- Page 3 of 4
Rev 1/10
clause or phrase of this resolution.
Section 5. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this resolution are authorized to
make necessary corrections to this resolution including, but not limited to, the correction of
scrivener/clerical errors, references, resolution numbering, section/subsection numbers and any
references thereto.
Section 6. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date
of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 7. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by
the Federal Way City Council.
RESOLVED BY THE CIT�i' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON this day of , 2010.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, LINDA KOCHMAR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, CAROL MCNEILLY, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.:
Resolution No.70- Page 4 of 4
Rev 1/10
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 6, 2010 ITEM #:��
_ __
_ _
_
__ _
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: AGREEMENT FOR PROBATION SERVICES
PoLICY QUEST�oN: Should the court contract with Providence Community Correcrions for misdemEanor
probarion services in the City of Federal Way through the Municipal Court?
COMIVIITTEE FEDRAC
CATEGORY:
� Consent
❑ City Council Business
REPORT BY: Jud�e David A. Larson
A ■
Ordinance
Resolution
Attachments: Professional Services Agreement for Probation Services
MEE'I'ING DATE: 3/23/2010
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
DEPT Municipal Court
Background: The court is responsible by law and court rule to manage probation. Providence
Community Corrections has provided probation services to the City of Federal Way Municipal Court
since 2004. Providence has provided comprehensive probation services at no cost to taxpayers. In fact,
Defendants pay Providence directly and Providence, in turn, pays the city money each month under the
e�sting contract to cover court-related probation expenses. Recently, the Court solicited interest from
potential providers of probation services to make sure that the best possible probation services are
provided in Federal Way. Providence's response most closely met the request for services and the most
financially advantageous, including potential cost savings from jail alternative programs.
Options Considered:
1) Authorize the agreement between the City of Federal Way Municipal Court and Providence
Services Corporation for misdemeanor probation services.
2) Authorize the agreement between the City of Federal Way Municipal Court and Providence
Services Corporation for misdemeanor probation services with modifications.
3) Not authorize the agreement between the City of Federal Way Municipal Court and Providence
Services Corporation for misdemeanor probation services and provide guidance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Council authorize an agreement between the City of Federal Way Municipal
Court and Providence Community Corrections for misdemeanor probation services.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: , y,?q/V �� ��� DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
Comrm ee Council
council
CONIl�IITTEE RECOMD�NDA1'ION �no�e
I�YI�Y�' �Q, G� C!T
� � �7 �
�
e hair
�
� � � 0 11, � �� � �R
� 1 � ►I � � � � /
� , : � ► i� � '
1�
, �r..�ii'i ±����
s
� - - ,- � •� - - �-
PROPOSED CoUNCIL MoTION: "1 move approval of�the contract hetween the C�ry of Federal Way through
the Municipal Court and Providence Community Corrections. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1 reading
❑ TABLEDlDEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLiTl'ION #
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR
PROBATION SERVICES
This Professional Services Agreement ("Agreement") is dated effective this lst day of
January, 2010. The parties ("Parties") to this Agreement are the City of Federal Way ("City"), a
Washington municipal corporation by and through the Federal Way Municipal Court ("Court") and
Providence Services Corporation d/b/a Providence Community Corrections Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("Contractor").
A. The Court has the duty to provide misdem�anant probation services under_ARLJ
. i l and ot�i�ra�plicabl� law; and, °
B. The Court seeks the professional services of a skilled independent contractor
capable of working without direct supervision, in the capacity of providing
misdemeanant probation services; and,
C. The Contractor has the requisite skill, knowledge, and experience n�essary to
provide such services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Pazties agree as follows:
Services
Contractor sha11 provide the services for and on behalf of the Court more speci�cally
described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by this reference ("Services"), in a
manner consistent with the accepted practices for other similar services, in compliance with ARLJ 11
and other applicable laws, within the time prescribed by the Court pursuant to the orders of the court
or its designee.
The Court agrees to:
1.1 Refer appropriate cases to Contractor for supervision as contemplated in this
Agreement.
1.2 Identify authorized personnel to which Contractor may report violations;
1.3 Provide to Contractor required probation case and curfew information and Court
Order;
1.4 Identify and make available the Court's staff and/or equipment (fax, pager, email)
for the purpose of notification by the Contractor to the Court of alerts and
equipment status.
- 1 -
2. Term.
The term of this Agreement shall commence upon the effective date of this Agreement and
shall continue until the completion of the Services, but in any event no later than December 31, 2010
("Term"). This Agreement may be extended for up to two (2) additional two-year periods to
coincide with the City's biennial budget cycle upon the mutual written agreement of the Court and
the Contractor.
3. Termination
Either party may terminate this Agreement upon sixty (60) days written notice. The Court
may terminate this Agreement immediately for �ause, including without limitatiQn materi�al
breach-of•this:Agreement, insolven�}� of Contractor; filing of a voluntary or in�oluntary case in
bankruptcy.
Within twenty (20 ) working days of termination, Contractor shall peacefully surrender to
the Court all records and documents generated by Contractor in connection with this Agreement
and the services thereunder and any equipment or supplies assigned to Contractor by the Court.
The Court shall provide Conkractor a receipt for all property surrendered by Contractor under this
provision.
Contractor shall turn over to the City Finance Department any moneys collected or
received less supervision fees validly incurred and duly owing to Contractor through the
termination date. Any fines, costs, fees or restitution received by Contractor from probationers
owing to the City after termination of this Agreement shall be forwarded to the City Finance
Depertment. The City Finance Depertment shall provide Contractor a receipt for all monies paid
by Contractor to City under this provision.
4. Compensation.
Contractor will provide routine and non-routine probation services as described in Exhibit
"A" and be compensated for the services pursuant to the retained amounts listed in Exhibit "A".
The difference between the amount charged the probationer and the amount retained by the
contractor, if any, sha11 be remitted to the Court on a monthly basis. The amount to the Court shall
be calculated on monies actually collected from probationers; contractor has no obligation to remit
any amounts not paid by the probationer(s). Contractor shall use its best efforts to collect all monies
due. The parties agree that Contractor's retention amounts shall be paid first from any collections.
The Contractor shall be solely responsible for the payment of any taxes imposed by any
lawful jurisdiction as a result of the performance and payment of this Agreement.
- 2 -
Compliance with Laws.
Contractor shall comply with and perform the Services in accordance with all applicable
federal, state, and City laws including, without limitation, all City codes, ordinances, resolutions,
standards and policies, as now existing or hereafter adopted or amended.
6. Warrantv.
The Contractor wanants that it has the requisite training, knowledge, skill and experience
necessary to provide the Services and is appropriately accredited and licensed by a11 applicable
agencies and governmental entities, including but not limited to being registered to do business in the
City of Federal Way by obtaining a City of Federal Way business registration.
7. IndenendeMt GoMtractor/Conflict of Interest. . _.
It is the intention and understanding of the Parties that the Contractor shall be an independent
contractor and that the City nor the Court sha11 be neither liable nor obligated to pay Contractor sick
leave vacation pay or any other benefit of employment, nor to pay any social security or other tax,
which may arise as an incident of employment. The Contractor shall pay all income and other taxes
due. Industrial or any other insurance that is purchased for the benefit of the City, regazdless of
whether such may provide a secondary or incidental benefit to the Contractor, sha11 not be deemed to
convert this Agreement to an employment contract. It is recognized that Contractor may or will be
performing professional services during the Term for other parties; provided, however, that such
performance of other services sha11 not conflict with or interfere with Contractor's ability to perform
the Services. Contractor agrees to resolve any such conflicts of interest in favor of the City and the
Court.
8. ° Indemnification .
8.1 Contractor Indemnification. The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and
hold the City, the Court, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers
hannless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs
and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, including, without limitation,
their respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising from, resulting from, or
connected with this Agreement to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors or omissions
of the Contra.ctor, its partners, shareholders, agents, employees, or by the Contractor's breach
of this Ap,,reement. Contractor waives any immunity that may be granted to it under the
Washington State Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW. Contractor's indemni�cation
shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount of damages, compensation or
benefits payable to or by any third party under workers' compensation acts, disability benefit
acts or any other benefits act�s or programs.
8.2 Citv Indemnification. The City agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the
Contractor, its officers, directors, shareholders, partners, employees, and agents harmless
from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attomey
- 3 -
fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, including without limitation, their respective
agents, licensees, or representatives, arising from, resulting from or connected with this
Agreement to the extent solely caused by the negligent acts, enors, or omissions of the City,
its employees or agents.
8.3 Survival. The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or
termination of this Agreement with respect to any event occurring prior to such expiration or
termination.
9. Equa1 Opportunity Employer.
In all Contra.ctor services, programs or activities, and all Contractor hiring and employment
made possible by or resulting from this Agreement, there shall be no discriminatiQn by Contractor or _
by Cor�tractoT's er�ployees; agents, subcontractors or representatives against any perso�t because of
sex, age (except minimum age and retirement provisions), ra.ce, color, creed, national origin, marita.l
status or the presence of any disability, including sensory, mental or physical handicaps, unless based
uporr a bona fide occupational qualification in relationship to hiring and employment. This
requirement sha11 apply, but not be limited to the following: employment, advertising, layoff or
termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including
apprenticeship. Contractor shall not violate any of the terms of Chapter 49.60 RCW, Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans With Disabilities Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973 or any other applicable federal, state or local law or reguladon regarding non-discrimination.
Any material violation of this provision shall be grounds for termination of this Agreement by the
City or by the Court and, in the case of the Contractor's breach, may result in ineligibility for further
� City agreements.
10. Confidentialitv:
All information regarding the Court obtained by Contractor in performance of this Agreement
shall be considered confidential. Breach of confidentiality by Contractor will be grounds for
immediate termination.
11. Insurance.
The Contractor agrees to carry as a minimum, the following insurance, in such forms and
with such carriers who have a rating that is satisfactory to the City and to the Court:
11.1 Workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance in amounts
sufficient pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington;
11.2 Commercial general liability insurance with combined single limits of liability
not less than $2,000,000 for bodily injury, including personal injury or death, products
liability and property damage.
- 4 -
11.3 Automobile liability insurance with combined single limits of liability not less
than $2,000,000 for bodily injury, including personal injury or death and property damage.
11.4 Professional liability insurance with combined single limits of liability not
less than $2,000,000 for damages sustained by reason of or in the course of operation under
this Agreement, whether occurring by reason of acts, errors or omissions of the Contractor.
The City shall be named as additional insured on all such inswance policies, with the
exception of workers' compensation coverage(s) if Contractor participates in a state-run workers'
comp program. Contractor shall provide certificates of insurance, concurrent with the execution of
this Agreement, evidencing such coverage and, at City's request, furnish the City with copies of all
insurance policies and with evidence of payment of premiums or fees of such policies. All insurance
policies shall contain a clause of endorsement providing that they -may not be terminated or
� materially amended d"uring the Term of this Agreement, except after thirty (3U) days prior w�itten
notice to the City and to the Court. If Contractor's insurance policies are "claims rnade," Contractor
shall be required to maintain tail coverage for a minimum period of three (3) years from the date this
Agreement is a.ctually terminated or upon project completion and acceptance by the City.
Contractor's failure. to maintain such insurance policies shall be grounds for the Court's immediate
termination of this Agreement.
The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement
with' respect to any event occurring prior to such expiration or termination.
12. Work Product
All originals and copies of work product, including plans, sketches, layouts, designs, design
specifications, records, files, computer disks, magnetic media or material that may be produced or
modified by Contractor while performing the Services shall belong to the City. At the termination or
cancellation of this Agreement, all originals and copies of any such work product remaining in the
possession of Contractor shall be delivered to the Court.
l3. Books and Records
The Contractor agrees to maintain books, records, and documents, which sufficiently and
properly reflect a11 direct and indirect costs related to the performa.nce of the Services and maintain
such accounting procedures and practices as may be deemed necessary by the City of Federal Way
Finance Department to assure proper accounting of a11 funds paid pursuant to this Agreement. These
records shall be subject, at all reasonable times, to inspection, review or audit by the Court, its
authorized representative, the State Auditor, or other governmental officials authorized by law to
monitor this Agreement.
14. Non-ApUropriation of Funds.
If sufficient funds are not appropriated or allocated for payment under this Agreement for any
future fiscal period, the City will not be obligated to make payments for Services or amounts
— 5 —
incuned after the end of the current fiscal period, and this Agreement will terminate upon the
completion of all remaining Services for which funds are allocated. No penalty or expense sha11
accrue to the City in the event this provision applies.
15. General Provisions
15.1 Entire A�reement. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the Parties with
respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this Agreement and no prior agreements shall be
effective for any purpose.
15.2 Modification. No provision of this Agreement, including this provision, may be
amended or modified except by written agreement signed by the Parties.
- 15.3 Full Force and Effect: Any provisio� of this Agreemenk that is.deelared invalid Qr _.
illegal shall in no way affect or invalidate any other provision hereof and such other provisions shall
remain in full force and effect.
15.4 Assi¢nment. Neither the Contractor nor the Ciry nor the Court shall have the right to
transfer or assign, in whole or in part, any or all of its obligations and rights hereunder without the
prior written consent of the other Paity.
15.5 Successors in Interest. Subject to the foregoing Subsection, the rights and obligations
of the Parties sha11 inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors in interest,
heirs and assigns.
15.6 Attornev Fees. In the event either of the Pazties defaults on the performance of any
terms of this Agreement or either Party places the enforcement of this Agreement in the hands of an
attomey, or files a lawsuit, each Party shall pay all its own attorneys' fees, costs and expenses. The
venue for any dispute related to this Agreement shall be King County, Washington.
15.7 No Waiver. Failure or delay of the City or the Court to declare any breach or default
immediately upon occurrence shall not waive such breach or default. Failure of the City or the Court
to declare one breach or default does not act as a waiver of the City or the Court's right to declare
another breach or default.
15.8 GoverninQ Law. This Agreement sha11 be made in and shall be governed by and
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.
15.9 Authoritv. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City, the Court
and Contractor represents and warrants that such individuals are duly authorized to execute and
deliver this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor, the City or the Court.
- 6 -
15.10 Notices. Any notices required to be given by the Parties shall be delivered at the
addresses set forth below. Any notices may be delivered personally to the addressee of the notice or
may be deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the address set forth below. Any
notice so posted in the United States mail shall be deemed received three (3) days after the date of
mailing.
15.11 Captions. The respective captions of the Sections of this Agreement are inserted for
convenience of reference only and sha11 not be deemed to modify or otherwise affect any of the
provisions of this Agreement.
15.12 Performance. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of its
provisions in which performance is a factor. Adherence to completion dates set forth in the
deseription of the Services is essential to the Contractor's performance of this Agreement.
15.13 Remedies Cumulative. Any remedies provided for. under the terms of this Agreement
are not intended to be exclusive, but shall be cumulative with a1l other remedies available to the City
at law, in equity or by statute.
. 15.14 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, wl�ich
counterparts shall collectively constitute the entire Agreement.
�. 15.15 Compliance with Ethics Code. If a violation of the City's Ethics Resolution No. 91-
54, as amended, occurs as a result of the formation and/or performa.nce of this Agreement, this
Agreement may be rendered null and void, at the City's option.
15.16 ,: Equal Opportunitv to Draft. The parties.have participated and had an equal
opportunity to participate in the drafting of this Agreement, and the Exhibits,
if any, attached. No ambiguity shall be construed against any party upon a
claim that that party drafted the ambiguous language.
\\\
\\\
\\\
\\\
\\\
\\\
\\\
— 7 —
DATED the day and yeaz set forth above.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
FEDERAL WAY MUNICIPAL COURT
By:
The Honorable David A. Larson
Presiding Judge
ATTEST:
� Cify Cler1�, C�ro1 McNeily
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
By:
Brian Wilson, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Patricia A Riehard.son, City Attorney
Providence Community Corrections, Inc.
By:
Brian Heidinger
Its: Director of Operations
1000 Iris Drive, Suite E
Conyers, GA 30013
Phone: (770) 595-8643
Fax: � (704) 972-8227
On this day personally appeazed before me • , to me known to be the
of that executed the
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and
deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath sta.ted that helshe
was authorized to execute said inswment and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of
said corporation.
GIVEN my hand and official seal this day of , 200_.
(typed/printed name of notary)
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington.
My commission expires
�:�
EXHIBIT A: SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. In addition to the terms and provisions set forth in the above referenced Agreement, Contractor
shall provide the following routine probation services, which include but are not necessarily limited
to:
1. Perform intake on sentenced misdemeanants, including obtaining all pertinent data (i.e.
telephone numbers; address, place of employment, emergency contact, etc.). Maintain the
intake information in an automated case management system, and a hard copy file.
2. Monitor/verify compliance with conditions imposed by the court (i.e. restitution,
� alcohoUdxug evaluatioas/treatment, community�service, etc.).- •
3. Confer with court staff, the prosecutor's office, defense counsel, and judges on cases as
appropriate.
4. Coordinate case scheduling with court staff in accordance with established court procedures.
5. Prepare and serve paperwork on probationers including, but not limited to, orders of
probation violadons, pmbation modification, early ternunation, revocations and warrants in a
forma't approved by the court.
6. Prepare routine management control reports, delinquency reports, and warrants when
appropri�te. •
7. File revocat'ion petitions and orders, and coordinate scheduling for revocation hearings.
8. Testify at delinquency or revocation hearings.
9. Collect, deposit, and report all fees due the court from probationers. Collect and disburse
restitution payments.
10. Provide professional, courteous services and supervision to the probationers to facilitate the
completions of all Court requirements and to establish and coordinate community service
work progams.
11. Maintain appropriate contact with probationers.
12. Provide case management and referrals for treatment and employment assistance as needed.
13. Coordinate and monitor attendance at special treatment programs or schools as required.
Provide alcohol testing and substance abuse monitoring.
- 9 -
14. Coordinate and monitor probationer's court-ordered participation on an electronic home
monitoring program as required.
15. Establish and maintain a list of City of Federal Way approved locations for cornmunity
service where offenders can complete hours ordered by the Court. Coordinate and control
efforts necessary for effective community service work.
16. Work with the Court to develop strategies to reduce the incidence of recidivism among
misdemeanor offenders.
1?. Contractor shall provide the following levels of routine service with probatianers with a
finding of guilty and for de�ened proseci�tions:
A., Active — Probationer must complete affir�r►ative conditio�s of sentence and
Contractor monitors the conditions with the following levels of contact with
probationer:
Level One includes one contact each week;
Level Two includes one contact every other week; and _
Level Th7°ee includes one contact per month.
B. Administrative - Contractor will perform records checks every six (6) months.
These probationers shall have no affirmative conditions other than obey all laws.
C. Informal - Contractor will perform reeords checks every six (6) months for
probationers are on 60 months probation who have completed all conditions except
the requirements of having no criminal law violations and/or attendance at self-help .
meetings.
D. Indigent — Probationer is considered in "Active" status, but meets Contractor's
definition of indigent.
18. Probationers shall be charged the following amounts for routine services :
Active (probationers with affirmative conditions) $55.00 per month
Administrative (probationers without affirmative conditions) $20.00 per month
Informal $10.00 per month
Indigent Supervision $15.00 per month
19. Contractor shall retain amounts collected for routine services from probationers as follows:
Active
Administrative
Informal
Indigent Supervision
$39.00
$15.00
$ 9.00
$15.00
— 10 —
It is understood that the compensation method for Active probation has been sirnplified from
previous methods at the request of Contractor. The Court and/or City of Federal Way Finance
Department may ask for an accounting at the end of each year to make sure that the new method of
distribution is not financially disadvantageous compared to previous years. The Court is entitled to
the same or better share of revenue than the previous method of distributing revenue.
20. Contractor will provide the following non-routine probation services with the following
charges made to probationers if required by the court:
Substance Abuse Detection Screens:
Pre SenEencing Irivestigations (PSI)
Electronic Home Monitoring
Active Radio Frequ�ncy or Sobrietoronly
Active Radio Frequency with Alcohol Monitoring
SCRAM only
GPS Monitoring .
Day Reporting
Mandatory Community Service Scheduling/Compliance
$20.00 per test
$120.00 per assessment
$12.00 per day
$12.00 per day
$15:00 per day
$14.00 per day
$15.00 per day
$10.00 per day
$ 5.00 per day
21. Contractor sha11 retain net amounts collected for non-routine services collected from
� probationers as follows:
Substance Abuse Detection Screens:
Pre Sentencing Investigations (PSI)
`�Electronic Home Monitoring
- °Active Radio Frequency or Sobrietor only
Active Radio Frequency with Alcohol Monitoring
SCRAM only
GPS Monitoring
Day Reporting
Mandatory Community Service Scheduling/Compliance
$20.00 per test
$120.00 per assessrnent
$10.00 per day
$10.00 per day
$13.00 per day
$12.00 per day
$13.00 per day
$10.00 per day
$ 5.00 per day
The City may choose to pay up to the above net retained amounts on a sliding scale to
Contractor if:
A. The non-routine service is ordered by the court in lieu of incarceration in jail; or,
B. If defendant's inability to pay for such non-routine services would result in
incarceration in jail; and,
C. The probationer is indigent as defined by the sliding scale provided by Contractor
and approved by the City.
- il -
22. MONTTORING SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONTRACTOR
22.1 Monitoring Services. Con�ractor will provide the following monitoring services to the
Court for the Court's operation of an electronic monitoring program. The monitoring
services provided hereunder ase specifically designed to determine by electronic means the
presence of a person at a specified location (typically that person's place of residence).
22.2 Contractor will perform the functions of data entry and data storage for all properly
enrolled probationers. The data entry function consists of the input of all required
demographic, curfew, and system configwation information on each case into the central
host computer system.
� 22.3 Contractor will provide not�fication of Alert Conditians to authorized and identified
Conrt's �taff. Alert noti�ication will be in accordanca v�ith Seetion t.1:51�erein qr as agreed
upon in writing by the Court and Contractor.
22.4 Alert conditions and Equipment status information for each Probationer will be .
documented and maintained by Contractor.
23. EQUIPMENT.
Contractor shall supply a sufficient quantity of Units to meet the Court's need subject to
forty-eight (48) hour notice prior to shipment.
23.1 Maintenance. . Contractor shall maintain the Equipment at its expense. The
Probationer shall be responsible for .lost or missing Equipment an/or the cost of requirecl repairs
necessitated by (i) the Probationer's negligence or (ii) the damage or destruction of the Equipment by
the parties other than CONTRACTOR. The court will assist Contractor in enforcement of this
policy.
24. MONPTORING SYSTEM
24.1 Description. The monitoring system utilized hereunder is an active monitoring system
consisting of a Transmitter, an FMD and a central computer system. The Units communicate
with the host computer system through the probationer's standard telephone service.
24.2 System Maintenance. The Court acknowledges that periodic maintenance on the host
computer system is required. During the performance of this maintenance, the system may
be required to be temporarily `off-line'. The Court will be notified in advance of any such
situation.
24.3 Contractor expressly disclaims any warranty that any equipment provided hereunder is
impervious to tampering.
- 12 -
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 04/06/2010 ITEM #:��
_ _ _ ___ _ _
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF AUBURN
PoLaCY QuESTION: Should the City accept proposed modifications to the agreement with Cit�� of Auburn for
Shared Resource Conservarion Management Services?
COMMITTEE:
CAT'EGORY:
� Consent
❑ City Council Business
�
�.
Ordinance
Resolution
MEETING DATE:
❑ Puk�Gc Hearing
Other
STAF'F RFPORT BY: Bryant Enge, FSA DEPT: City Manager
Attachments: Interlocal Agreement between the Cities of Auburn and Federal Way for Shared Resource
Conservation Management Services
Background: There are external funding opportunities related to a position that would support an
agency's energy and resource efficiency program. The City is making investmenty in its lighting and
HVAC infrastructure. This position will assist the City in maacimizing its investments and assist the City
in reporting the effectiveness of these investments. The resources are being made available based on an
agency's usage. In order to receive these resources, the City needs to partner with another city to meet the
energy usage threshold. The Cities of Auburn and Federal Way are proposing a partnership. The City of
Federal Way will be the lead agency.
The City of Federal Way approved the agreement for 5hared Resource Conservation Management
Services on 03/02/2010. Subsequently, the City of Auburn proposed modifying the agreement. The
proposed modifying language does not change the scope of services or compensation. The purpose of the
proposed language is to add clarity as to the processes concerning the program.
Options Considered:
1.
2.
3.
Approve proposed modifications to the agreement with the City of Auburn for Shared Resource
Conservation Management Services.
Approve proposed modifications to the agreement with the City of Auburn for Shared Resource
Conservation Management Services with revisions.
Not approve proposed modifications to the agreement with the City of Auburn for Shared
Resource Conservation Management Services and provide guidance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve proposed modifications to the agreement with City of Auburn for
5hared Resource Conservation Management Services.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ,W ,? � .(.,I�����IItECTOR APPROVAL:
Commit ee Council
Council
- , --
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: �� G�� �' �� �'
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED - 02/06/2006 RESOLiTl'ION #
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF AUBURN AND FEDERAL
WAY FOR RESOURCE CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
This Interlocal Agreement is made and entered into this day of ,
2010, by and between the City of Auburn, Washington, a municipal corporation
(hereinafter referred to as "Auburn"), and the City of Federal Way, Washington, a
municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Federal Way"), (hereinafter collectively
referred to as "the Parties").
WHEREAS, chapter 39.34 RCW, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, authorizes
municipalities in Washington to enter into agreements for the joint undertaking of certain
projects as provided therein; and
WHEREAS, the Parties are working as partners to pursue a two-year Resource
Consenration Management Grant ("Grant") from the Washington State Department of
Commerce, which, if received, will be used to start a Resource Conservation .
Management Program ("Program") to serve all the Parties; and
WHEREAS, the Parties may elect to participate in a Resource Conservation Manager
services agreement with Puget Sound Energy, as set forth and under the terms and
conditions of an Energy Conservation Grant for Resource Conservation Manager
Services; and
WHEREAS, the Program would study and address how each Party could use utility
resources, including water, sewer, electricity, oil, and natural gas, more e�ciently; and
WHEREAS, Washington State University Extension Energy Program will provide
program and technical support to assist with the shared Program; and
WHEREAS, Federal Way is willing to take the lead in providing administrative oversight
of the Program on behalf of all the Parties, and to become the "organization of record"
pursuant to the Grant requirements; and
WHEREAS, this Interlocal agreement is entered into for the mutual benefit of the
Parties.
Now, therefore, for and in consideration of the services to be rendered, resources to be
shared, and the payments to be made, the parties hereby recite, covenant and agree as
follows:
_ _ _ _ __- __ _._ __ _ _ _
1. Resource Conservation Manaqer Position & Work Plan. if the Grant is
received, a Resource Conservation Manager (RCM} will be hired as a temporary
full-time equivalent (FTE) to provide RCM services to the Parties. Prior to
advertising for a contractor, the Parties shall meet to prepare a Work Plan for the
RCM.
At the minimum, the Work Plan shall address, and the RCM is expe�ted to
implement, the following:
Energy Accounting (utilizing software provided under the Grant);
Basic utility efficiency and resource management action plan for facilities;
Review of resource use and potentia( aetions;
Implementation of low-cosUno-cost measures and activities, and
measurement of results;
Assisting the Parties in securing additional grant funding and assisting in
finding rebate programs that support relevant energy efficiency projects;
Participating in technical and software training;
Reporting of results to all Parties' administrations; and
Reporting of results and successes to Commerce and the WSU Extension
Energy Program.
2. Selection of RCM. Representatives from both Federal Way and Aubum will
jointly participate in hiring the individual pursuant to personnel practices of the
Parties The RCM will be hired as soon as practicable following execution of �this
contract.
3. Compensation. Federal Way shall,pay the FTE's salary if an employee is hired,
and shall prepare billing statements for distribution to the Parties. Federal Way
will be responsible for paying and enrolling any applicable Public Employee
Retirement System (PERS) for the FTE and pay any applicable payrolt taxes
associated with the FTE's salary. For amounts in excess of what any Grant
funds cover, Auburn shall reimburse Federal Way 50% of any such excess,
unless allocation of the RCM's time is not 50/50, in which case, Se�tion 4 will
control. The reimbursement schedule will be established consistent with
payment terms set forth in the contract with the RCM.
4. Allocation of RCM time. Representative from both Federal Way and Aubum
will jointly supervise the RCM and provide an annual evaluation of the RCM. In
the event of discipline/counseling is deemed necessary, both the City of Aubum
and City of Federal Way will confer with each other and gain consensus before
imposing the discipline/counseling. The City of Federal Way's Policies and
Procedures will control the process for discipline. Both the City of Federal Way
and Aubum will jointly assume the risk and liabilities associated with evaluations
and disciplinary actions imposed on the RCM. The RCM shall allocate his or her
time 50/50. The RCM will spend 50% of his/her time performing RCM services
on behaif of Auburn and the other 50% on behalf of Federal Way with the duties
outlined in the RCM Work Plan. For purposes of efficiency and effectiveness the
RCM may be required to spend Additional Time, more than 50% of their time with
one Party in a month. In this event, for compensation purposes, the Party
receiving Additional Time will be responsible for cost of the actual time over 50%
and the other Party shall receive a credit for this actual time.
The proportions will hold for 12 months, and will be reevaluated annually. tf
operations require or result in a notable change in resource consumption with
one or both of the Parties within a given 42-month period, Federal Way or
Auburn can call for a reevaluation of the established annual proportion.
Adjustments can then be made with the written agreement of both Parties.
5. Status and Workspace. Federal Way and Auburn shall make a workspace
available, to include a desk, chair, and access to standard office equipment and
computer connections.
6. Additional Responsibilities of All Parties. As the lead Party, Federal Way
shall have the following additional responsibilities:
Represent all Parties in communication with the Washington State
Department of Commerce (Commerce} and Washington State University
Extension Energy Program (WSU Energy);
: Provide WSU Energy with summarized monthly activity reports, showing
activities associated with the minimal program requirements as stated
' above; �
Provide WSU Energy with quarterly reports indicating resource usage and
savings, resource expenditure amounts and savings; and
Provide Commerce with reports as per the anticipated agreement befinreen
Commerce and Federal Way, acting as lead for Parties.
7. Support and Monitorinq of RCM. The Parties shall support and monitor the
performance and progress of the RCM in the following ways:
Meet at regular intervals to assess RCM progress;
Seek support of the Puget Sound Energy RCM Support Services;
program. Each Party must provide data and application materials to
Federal Way if necessary to apply for grant funds in connection with the
PSE program;
Establish a perFormance evaluation process for the RCM;
Provide access of all owned facilities to RCM;
Provide access to RCM of all utility bills, statements, and data; and
Facilitate meetings between RCM and facilities managers, and RCM and
other appropriate staff.
8. Term. This agreement shall only take effect after the Grant is approved, and
thereafter shall continue in force and effect for the duration of the two-year grant
program. Extension of the terms of this agreement beyond the initial finro-year
grant period may be affected by written agreement of the parties.
9. Termination. Any Party may terminate its participation in this Interlocal
Agreement, or its receipt of RCM services, at any time for any reason by
providing at least sixty (60) days advance notice of termination in writing to the
other Parties. However, the Party requesting termination must continue to
reimburse Federal Way pursuant to Section 3 of this Agreement until completion
of the Grant program unless all remaining Parties agree to new reimbursement
responsibilities and amounts resulting from updated proportions.
10. Modification. This Agreement may be modified by further written agreement
upon mutual acceptance by both Parties.
11. Compliance with Laws. Each party accepts responsibility for compliance with
federal, state, or local laws and regulations including, in particular, that party's
bidding requiremen#s applicable to the acquisition of any goods, services, or
equipment obtained through the cooperative process agreed to herein.
12. Indemnification
Indemnification. Auburn agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Federal Way, its
elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any
and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and all
attomey fees) to or by any.and all persons or entities, including, without
limitation, their respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising from,
resulting from, or connected with this Agreement resulting from any action or
omission of the RCM during such time that the RCM performs services under this
Agreement for Aubum.
Federal Way Indemni�cation. Federal Way agrees to indemnify, defend and hold
Auburn, its efected officials, commissioners, officers, employees, agents and
volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and
liabilities (including costs and attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or
entities, including without limitatian, their respective agents, licensees, or
representatives, arising from, resulting from or connected with this Agreement
resulting from any action or omission of the RCM during such time that the RCM
perForms services under this Agreement for Federal Way.
Survival. The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or termination
of this Agreement with respect to any event occurring prior to such expiration or
termination.
13. Contact Persons. The Parties stipulate that the following persons shall be the
contact person for their respective jurisdiction.
a. City of Auburn;
Steven Burke
25 W Main Street
Auburn, WA 98001-4998
Office: 253.876.1946/Fax: 253.333.8890
b. City of Federal Way:
Bryant Enge
33325 8 th Ave S
PO Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
Office: (253) 835-2514/Fax: (253) 835-2409
14. Filin . A copy of this Agreement shall be filed with the City Clerk of the City of
Federal Way, and the City Clerk for Auburn and recorded with the King County
Auditor, if required by law.
15. General Provisions. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the
Parties with respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this Agreement. No
provision of this Agreement may be amended or modified except by written
agreement signed by the Parties. This Agreement shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit of the Parties' successors in interest, heirs and assigns. Any
provision of this Agreement which is declared invalid or illegal shall in no way
affect or invalidate any other provision. In the event either of the Parties defaults
on the perFormance of any terms of this Agreement or either Party places the
enforcement of this Agreement in the hands of an attomey, or files a lawsuit,
each Party shall pay all its own attorneys' fees, costs and expenses. The venue
for any dispute related to this Agreement shall be King County, Washington.
Failure of the City tQ declare any breach or default immediately upon the
occurrence thereof, or delay in taking any action in connection with, shall not
waive such breach or default. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and
each and all of its provisions in which perFormance is a factor.
16. Non-Discrimination. The Parties shall not discriminate in any manner on the
basis of any protected class status as defined by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
and the Revised Code of 1Nashington 49.60 Washington Law Against
Discrimination.
,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties have hereunto placed their hand and seals on the
day and year indicated.
CITY OF AUBURN GTY OF FEDERAL WAY
BY: BY:
Peter B. Lewis, Mayor City ManagerlPolice Chief, Brian Wilson
Date:
Approved as to Form
' For City of Auburn
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
ATTEST: This day of
. 20
Date:
Approved as to Form
for City of Federal Way
City Attomey, Patricia A. Richardson,
ATTEST: This day of
, 20
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
Federal Way City Clerk
Carol McNeilly, CMC
_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ __ . _ __ _ _
COUNCIL MEET[hG D�TF.: , .. � ' ITEh1 #:
_ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ �►�1_�. �0�._.�.�_-� 1D._..__ _ __ _ _ _ .. _ ___ �
CITY OF FEDERAL �VAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUB.►ECT: Amendments to Federa! Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code," related to Accessory
Dwel(ing Gnit (aDU) size calculation and aDU Use Zone Chart housekeeping amendments.
Po[.[CV QuEST[0�5: Should the city amend the FWRC to exclude garages, workshops, and similar non-living areas from the size
calculation of ADUs; remove the 1�,000 square foot lot size requirement for detached ADUs; and make housekeeping amendments to
the ADU Us e Zone Charts to remove duplicative and irrelevant language?
CONIA[[TTEE Land Usz'�'ransportation Cominittee (LUTC) NIEETIi11C DATE March 1, 2009
CATEGORY:
� Consent � Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing
❑ City Councii Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY: Viatthew Herrera, Associate Plan�er DEeT: Community Development Servi
Exhibits: ( L) Planning Commission staff report for the February 17, 2010, public hearing tivith Exhibits A-D; (2) DraB minutes of the
February 17, 2010, Ptanning Commission meeting; and (3) Draft adoption ordinance.
Background:
ADUSize Clarification - The proposed amendment would exclude garages, workshops, and simi(ar non-iiving areas from the ADU size
calcuiation. Cunent ADU size maximums limit ADUs to 800 square feet, but no larger than 40 percent of the primary dwellin� unit. A
typical one or tw�o car aarage or a�vorkshop could account for a significant portion of the maximum square footage allowance and
prohibit a single-family homeo�ti-ner from conshucting an ADU.
Detached ADt! Minimum Lot Size - The proposed amendment would remove the I5,000 square foot lot size limitation for detached
ADUs. Current regulations require a minimum 15,000 square foot lot to construct a detached ADU. Single-family homeowners with lots
that conform to the underlying zoning density, but have lots less than 15,000 square feet, are eligible for attached ADUs only. Existing
lot coverage, parking/access requirements, and the city's accessory definition would keep detached ADUs subordinate in size and scale.
Housekeeping Amendn:ents - The proposed amendment �vould correct the Use Zone Charts related to parking, review process,
maximum lot coverage, and lot size lanauage.
Options Considered: 1) Adopt the Ptanning Commissior►'s recommendation as contained in the Draft Adoption Ordinance (Exhibit 3);
2) Adopt the P(annin� Commission's recommendation as modified b� the LUTC_or 3) Do not ado�t the_propose�olicY• _
PLANNI;YG CO�I�iISSIn� RECO�1�[E�DAT[O�ti Adoption of Option #l.
STAFF RECOMNIENDAT[ON: Staff recommends the Council adopt Option #1 adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation as
contained in the Draft Adoption Ordinance
C[1'Y MANAGER APPRO�'AL: � L6�I� °� �y �, �`�'B[ItECTOR APPROVAL: � �
Committee Council Committee Councii
COM1�IlTfEE RECOhi1;ENDAT[ON Forward Option #• dopt the Plannin� Comrnission's recommendation as contained in the Draft
Adopti r inance to the full Council on Marc 6, 2010 for fir reading
. �
Dini Duclos, Chair Ji errell, Member �c ey, Me er
PROPOSED COUNCIL 1l�IOTlO�(S): � �`�""'�
1� READING OF ORDI�IANCE (3/16/10): " � move to fonvard the ordinance to a second rea rng for enactment on the Apri16, 2010,
eonsent agenda. " �
2 1VD READING OE ORDINANCE (={/6/10) "I move approva! of the TC's recommendation to approve the code amendments, which are
c in the Adoption Ordin�nce. " �
I
I
COUNCiL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED
� DEIV[ED
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED1iV0 ACTION
``C� MOVED TO SECOND READINC (ordina�ires only)
REVISED - 02/O6/2006
COUNCIL BILL #
�sr reading
Enactment reading
ORDiNANCE #
RESOLUTION #
K12009 Code Ame�mmts�.ADli and Appraisai Clarific:uiun�.L�TC.:1Dt; �,4DU Re�ised :\grn�a BiI1.DOC
� °��
L17Y OF «���
��der�� �a�r
DaTE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
F[LE:
MEETING DATE:
EX�l�I'P �
PAGE.�_OF��
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
February 10, 2010
Chair Merle Pfeifer and Members of City of Federal Way Planning Commission
Greg Fewins, Director of Community Development Services
Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner
Accessory Dtivelling Unit (ADU) Size Calculation
10-t00304-UP
February 17, ZO10
A. POL[CY QUEST(ON
Should the city exclude garage and workshop areas from the size calculation of an Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU) and should the city add language to Federa! Way Revised Code (FWRC)
19.195.180 and 19.200.180 codifying such a policy? Should the city remove the 15,000 square-foot
lot size requirement for detached ADUs? Also, should the city provide housekeeping amendments to
the referenced code sections to remove duplicative and irrelevant language?
B. ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A— Proposed FWRC 19.195.180, Suburban Estates (SE) Use Zone Chart
Exhibit B— Proposed FWRC 19.200.180, Single-Family Residential (RS) Use Zone Chart
Exhibit C— Email notification to stakehoider list of Planning Commission public hearing
Exhibit D— Emaii notification to stakeholder list of Planning Commission sta.ff report
C. BACKGROUND & ANALYS[S
The proposed code amendment is part of the 2009 Long Range Work Program. The intent of the
amendment is to: (1) provide clarification for both permit review staff and applicants of what areas
are excluded in the calculation of ADU square footage; (2) remove the 15,000 square foot minimum
lot size requirement for detached ADUs; and (3) make several housekeeping amendments to the A.DU
use zone charts.
1) Square Footage Clarification — The calculation of square footage is an important step in the
permitting process due to prescriptive maximums within the zoning and development code's
ADU regulations. Currently, ADU maximums are set at 800 square feet, but are not to exceed 40
percent of the square footage of the primary residence. Therefore a 1,200 square foot primary
residence would qualify for a maximum 480 square foot ADU.
Accessory Dweiling Unit (ADU) Size Calculation File #i0-100304-UP
Planning Commissior► Staff Report Page 1 of 5
�����i� �
P��E 2 t��_�
The putpose of the ADU size code amendment is to clarify what areas shall be excluded from the
maximum size calculation, specitically whether garage, workshops, and similar non-living areas
should be excluded from the total square footage calculation. The existing "accessory" defi�iition
will keep detached ADUs and any associated non-living areas, such as garages and workshops,
subordinate in size, scale, and design; thereby, making the ADU clearly secondary to the primary
residence.
FWRC defines an ADU as, "...a freestanding detached structure, excluding outdoor storage
containers and similar structures used or designed to be used as living facilities, or an attached
part of a structure which is accessory to the main or primary dwelling unit iocated on the subject
property, providing compiete, independent living facilities exclusively for one single
housekeeping unit, including permanent provisions for living, steeping, cooking and sanitation."
The current ADU definitiox� does not exclude non-living areas. Staff has used the "... iiving,
sleeping, cooking and sanitation..." portion of the definition as an interpretation that only areas
such as bedrooms, kitchens, bathrooms/laundry, and living rooms are used for maximum
calculation. Current staff interpretation would exclude the garage area in the calculation, but
include areas related to the ADU, such as a laundry area located adjacent to or within the garage
area.
Common detached ADUs consist of a garage with second story living space. A typical one or two
car garage or workshop could account for a significant portion of the maximum square footage
allowance; thereby, prohibiting single-family homeowner from constructing an ADU. Two of the
four sample jurisdictions specifically exempt certain areas from ADU size calculation (Des
Moines and Kent have no exclusionary language). Staff is proposing changes to clarify that the
size of the ADU, excluding garage, workshop, and similar non-living areas, shall not exceed 40
percent of the square foota.ge of the primary dweliing unit, as shown in Exhibits A and B.
Ci Is ADU Size Lan ua e Clear? Clarification Lan a e
An accessory dwelling unit exclud�s accessory
residentia! uses such as residential garage,
Auburn Yes guest cottage, recreation room, tooi shed,
swimming pool, noncommercial greenhouse,
private stable, bam, pen, coop, or similar
structure. ACC 18.04.018 & ACC 18.04.023
...complete independent tiving facilities
including provisions for living, sleeping,
Des Moines No cooking, and sanitation within a detached
structure or within part of the primary dwelling
unit. DMMC 18.04.015
...a habitable dwelling unit added to, created
within, or detached from and on the same lot
Kent No with a single-family dwelling that provides basic
requirements for living, sleeping, eating,
cooking, and sanitarion. KCC 15.02.003
The ADU, excluding any garage area and other
non-living areas, such as workshops or
Tacoma Yes g�eenhouses, shalt not exceed 40 percent of the
total square footage of the main building and the
ADU combined, after modification or
construction. TMC 13.06.150
Accessory D�velling Unit (ADU) Size Calculation File #t0-i00304-UP
Planning Commission Staff Report Page 2 of 5
E�1���1T 1
PA�� 3 �� � c�
2) Detached ADUMinimum Lot Size Requirernent — Current single-family residential ADU
regulations in the RS Use Zone Chart (Exhibit B) specitically require a minimum 15,000 square
foot lot to construct a detached ADU, regard(ess of the underlying zoning. Existing lot coverage,
parking/access requirements, and accessory requirements will keep !�DUs subordinate in size and
scale; therefore, staff is recommending the 15,000 square foot maximum be removed the ADU
regulations. Staff sampled the following jurisdictions for language regarding minimum size
standards for detached ADUs.
Cit Minimum Lot Size for Detached ADUs Code Lan ua e
Auburn No. Unlike FWRC, Auburn does not ACC 18.31.120 — Accessory dwelling
distinguish between attached or detached units are permitted outright in all
ADUs. residenrial zones that permit single-family
homes, and may be deveioped with new
or existing single-family homes. The
development standards of the underlying
zone and the following siring and
performance standards shall apply to all
accessory dwellin units
Des Moines No. Unlike FWRC, Des Moines does not DMMC 18.08_ 110 — The ALQ must not
distinguis� between attached or detached be iess than 350 square feet of living
ADUs. space. Accessory living quarters shall not
exceed 800 square feet if they are: {a)
detached from the primary single-family
dwelling; (b) created through an addition;
or (c) designed into a new structure at the
time of construction. For ALQs created
ivithin an existing single-family
residence, the square footage limitarion
on an ALQ shall be no more than 35
percent of the total square footage of the
primary dwe(ling.
Kent No. Unlike FWRC, Kent does not distinguish KCC 15_08.350 — One (1) ADU per
between attached or detached ADUs. dwelling unit is allowed out-right within
all SR, single-family residential zones,
and singie-family dwellings within the
city. An ADU may be established in a
new or existing single-family dwelling by
creating the unit within or in addition to
the dwetting, or as a detached unit from
the principal dwelling. The ADU, as well
as the main dwelling unit, must meet a11
applicable setbacks, lot coverage, and
building hei ht re uirements.
Tacoma Yes. Detached ADUs are not permitted in low TMC 13.06.150 — The ADU shall be
density single family residential zoning pemutted as a second dwelling unit added
districts. to or created within the main building or,
�vhen allowed, pernutted as a detached
unit preferabiy located in the rear yard
and/or adjacent to alleys. A detached
ADU shall not be located in front of the
main building or in the side yard setback
area.
� Des vloines refers to Accessory Dwelling Units as Accessory Living Quarters (ALQ)
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Size Calculation File #l0-100304-UP
Planning Commission Staff Report Page 3 of 5
�������° �_
����. � �� �c�
3) Housekeepi�tg Amendrnents to RS and SE Use Zone Charts - Staff also proposes housekeeping
amendments to the two referenced ADU use zone charts. The proposed amendments woutd: (1)
remove irrelevant language referring to the principal residence parking requirements and
replacing it �vith the specific ADU parking space requirement; (2) change the required review
process of `'Process [" to "None" as ADUs do not require a land use process; (3) add "accessory
structures" to Special Reguiations and Notes item #2 for maximum (ot coverage; (4) remove
duplicative minimum lot size language from SE use zone chart; and (5) re-number the RS and SE
use zone charts "Special Regulations and Notes" accordingly.
D. PROCEDURAL SUNIMARY
The proposed code amendments are exempt from environmental review pursuant to State
Environmental Policy Act Rules 197-11-800(19), Procedural Actions. The proposal relates solely to
governmental procedures containing no substantive standards respecting use or modification of the
environment.
Public notice of the Planning Commission hearing was published in the Federal Way Mirror and
emailed to the department's stakeholders {Exhibit C) February 3, 2010. This staff report was emailed
to the department's stakeho(ders February 10, 2010 (Exhibit D).
E. BASIS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACT[ON
FWRC Title 19, "Zoning and Development," Chapter 19.80, "Process VI Review," establishes a
process and criteria for development reguiation amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the
role of the Planning Commission is as foltows:
1. To review and evaluate the proposed deveiopment regulation amendments.
2. To determine whether the proposed development regulation amendment meets the
criteria provided by FWRC 19.80.130.
3. To forward a recommendation to City Council regarding adoption of the proposed
deveiopment regulation amendment.
F. DECIS[ONAL CRITER[A
FWRC 19.80.130 provides criteria for development regulation amendments. The following section
analyzes the compliance of the proposed amendments with the criteria provided by FWRC 19.80.130.
The city may amend the text of the FWRC only if it finds that:
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan.
Staff Response - The proposed code amendment is consistent with the following land use
and housing chapler policies:
L UP4 - Maximize e�ciency of the development review process.
LUP6 - Conduct regular reviews of the development regulations to determine how
to improve upon the permit review process.
Accessory Dweliiag Unit (ADU) Size Calculation File #10-100304UP
Planning Commission Staff Report Page 4 of 5
E�IH��l�° �
PAG� s �F�.
HP3 - Continase to alloii� accessory housing units tivithirt sirtgle fai►iily rreiglahorhoods
in a way that protects residential character, maintains specific design standards, and
cornplies rvith all applicable laws. Review accessory housing regulations and, if
necessary•, revise any regutation that inappropriately limits their development.
2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to pubiic health, safety, or welfare.
Staff'Response - The proposed code amendment bears a substantial relutionship to welfare
as it will remove ambiguity regarding what is and is not incic�ded in maximum ADUsquare
footage. Additionally, the proposed amendment allows those homeowners tivith adequate lot
sizes the ability to construct a detached ADU.
3. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the city.
Sta, ff Response - The proposed code amendment is in the best interest of the city as it provides
clarity to an existing code provision and provides homeowners the abitity to construct a
detached ADU if the underlying lot contains the prescribed minirraum density standards.
G. STAFF RECOMNIENDAT[ON
Staff recommends adding language that would exclude garages, workshops, and other non living
areas from maximum ADU size caiculations as shown in Exhibits A and B. Staff recommends the
removal of the 15,000 square foot minimum to detached ADUs as shown in Exhibits A and B. Staff
also recommends housekeeping amendments to remove irrelevant and duplicative language as shown
in Exhibits A and B and add "accessory structures" to item #2 of "Specia( Regulations and Notes" of
Exhibit B.
H. PLANN[NG COMMiSSION ACTION
Consistent �vith the provisions of FWRC 19.80.240, the Planning Commission may take the following
acrions regarding the proposed development regulation amendments:
1. Recommend to City Council adoption of the FWRC text amendments as proposed;
2. Modify the proposed FWRC text amendments and recommend to City Council
adoption of the FWRC text amendments as modified;
3. Recommend to City Council that the proposed FWRC text amendments not be
adopted; or,
4. Forward the proposed FWCC text amendments to City Council without a
recommendation.
K�2009 Code Ameadments`�Dll and Appra�sal ClaificatioMAlanning CommissionUDU1$taffreport and pfuposed IaoguagelAW Staf( Report.doc
Accessory Dweliing Unit (ADU) Size Calculation File #10-100304-UP
Planning Commission Staff' Report Page 5 of �
EXHIBIT A
19.195.180 Accessory dwelling units.
The followinK uses shall be
z DItZEc
O
� y
a �
� c �
oG � 3
USE
��
dwelling I note 1
unit (ADU) Nune
in single-
family
Pnxess I, II, III aud IV are describcd in
Chapter 19.55 FWkC,
Chapter 19.60 FW RC,
Chapter 14.65 FWRC,
permitted in the suburban estate (SE
read down to find use ... THEN, across for E
nums Maximums
uired Yards
v
v �
r-. �
6 Q O '.7 � �
,o � V a' 2 c ^�
in 0.�' .. x<n CG a
ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. See 3U ft.
note 2 above
average
building
elevation
zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section:
USE ZONE CHART
iCULA'CIONS
ZONE
SE
SPECIAL REGULATIONS ANll NOTES
1. An accessury dwelling unit (ADU) shali meet the definition outlined in FWRC 19.US.OIU. Minimum lot size 1'or ADUs is based
upon die minimum lot size for the existing primary dwelling unit as set 1'orth in PWRC 19.195.U10. �Mei��irtin�trri leF�ir.e f'r�ni
c.�tro�� in �nc nin:..4^.,�..,,_a..
2. Only une ADU may be created per subject property. The ADU, accessory stPUCtures and the primary dwelling unit tucether shall
not exceed the maximum lot cover�ge prescribed in FWItC 19.195.010.
3. An ADU shall be designed so that, to die degree reasonably feasible, the appearance of the building remains that uf � single-
family residence. 'Che Jesign and size of an ADU and the primary dwelling unit shsll conl'onn to all applicable standanls in the
zoning, building, plumbing elecu•ical, mechanic�l, tire, health, and any other applicable cudes, as reyuirrd fur any nrw
conscruction. All ADUs and primary dwelling units shall also meet thr minimum standards o£the UniCurm liuusing Cuile.
Certitication by apprupriate utility providers uf availability of sufticient water, sewer and/ur septic services w thc prupused Al)U,
must be provided as part of the application.
4. Reler to Chapter 19.125 fWRC, Uutdoors, Y�rds, und Landscaping, I'or appropriate reyuiremcnts.
• . . . , �e-t�e#+t+eNtr�-cjF-�rr�rg
o.� r,,. ,... n nr �
b� FWRC 19.265.010 contains regulations rcgurding home occupations anJ othcr accessory uses, Cacilities and activitics
associated with this use. Home occupations are not allowed in an ADU.
�¢. ADUs may be accessed through the entrunce to the primary dwelling unit or through an additional entrance on the side ur rear
of the residence. Only one entrance is allowed on the front of the residence.
8?. The property owner, must reside in either the primary dwelling unit ur ADU for six mondis or more of each calendar year, an�
at no time receive rent or other compensation for the owner-occupied unit.
9$. t�rt �g ADU, excludin�anxgarage workshop and similar non-living area� shall contain between 300 — 80U sq. Ft., but sh�ll
ttot exCeed 40% of the sq. ft. of the primdry dwelling unit. excludinQ �arage. workshop and �imilar nnu-liviug;ire•rs. 11ir unit sh�ll h�ve
no more than two bedrooms.
-19 9. No more than one single housekeeping unit may occupy an ADU.
��0. Application for an ADU permit shall be ma�ie to the department of conununity develupment servires in accurdaucc wiih thr
permit procedures adopted by the Jeparunent, and shall include a lett�r of applicatiun ti•om the owuer(s) stating th;�t the u�vner(s)
shall occupy one uf the dwelling units on the premises, except for buna tide temporary ubsences, for six months ur murc ui thc
calendar year. An ADU applicatiun shall slsu be filed as a deed restrictiun with the King Cuunty drp:u•tmcnt ut'rr�ords an�l
electiuns to indicate the presence of an AI�U, the requirement of owner uccupancy, and other standards f�r maimaining thc u'R�;
described in this Cude. Ca�irellation uf an AllUs registration may be �cromplished by thc owner tiling a lettrr with th� J�p:��ii
of cunvnunity development services ti�r recording at tlie depm•tment of records anJ elections, vr tnay uccur as a result ol�:in �
enlofecntent action. �
-}� J I. Fur sign requiremcnts that apply w the project, see Chapter 19.1�30 FWI2C'.
+3 12. ADUs are not pertnitted on duster subdivision lots �mder FWItC 18.SS.UaO(7).
�W �. Furprovisions that relute to Uic k�rping oCanimals, see Chupter 19.2GU FWIZC. -�
For other informatiun about parking and parking areas, see Chaprer 19,130 FWRC.
For details uf whal m•ry exceed this height linut, see FWRC 19.I 10.O5U et sey.
For details regarcfing reyuired yards, see FWRC 19.125.160 et seq.
K:�2U09 Code AmendmentsV�DU end Apprnisa� ClariticuionlPlanning CommisstunWDUIStuR'repo�t and proposed Ianguage�Exhibit A Revised SH Chart.doc
EXHIBIT B
19.200.180 Accessory dwelling units.
The followine uses shall be nermitted in the
�
�
0
U
a
See
note
2
zone subiect to the
USE ZONE CHART
� DIRECI'IONS
O
�
� �
� �
a
� �°
�' 3 N
v
USE c'r> `�
u za �
Re uired Yards
�
�
�
° � e`a
� � a
Aceessory Rreeess See [n RS 35.0 zones:
dwclling I nole 1 20 tl, 10 ft. 101
unit (AUU) IV�� Otherwise:
in single- 20 ft. See 5 ft.
family note
residences d
o k
r�
•�° 2
x�
30 ft.
above
average
building
elevation
residential
�
b �'
� F
,�
C �
aa
and notes set forth in this section:
ZONE
RS
SPECIAL 12EGULATIONS AND NOTES
�-p,�{� 1. An accessory dweliing w�it (AUU) shall u�eet the drlinitiun oudiued in FWRC 19.o5AtU. Miuiuwm lut size lor attnel+eJ AUUs is based upon
l p.at•kine tl�e miuimwn bt si2e fur the existing priiriary dwelliug unit as set fonh in F�VRC ] 9.200.010, eljed-AFX� �r�;t�e
�pace � . .
?. Ouly one ADU enay be created per subject propetty. The ADU. accrssory structures and the primary dwellin; iu�it togethrr shall not cxccrd
the maximum b! coverage prescribed iu FW RC I).20U.010, as follows:
a. ln RS 35.0 = 50%
b. ht RS I5.0 = 50°/u
a In RS 9.5 = 60%
d. In RS 7.2 = 60%
e. [n 12S 5.0 = 60%
G See FWRC 19.1 I OA20(2xb) for calculation of lot coverage for tlag lots.
3. An ADU sUall be designed so tl�ut, to tl�e degree reasonably f'easible, the uppearauce of tLe building rrmaii�s that uf a sin;le-t:uuily rr,i�leucr.
7'he desi�i and size of an AbU aud the prin�ary dwelling w�it shall conPonu to all •rpplicable standurds iu the wuiug, buildiu�, plwnbiug,
electrical, n�echanical, fire, heald�, aud auy odier applicable cudes, us required fur auy uew cuustructiuu. All ADUs aud prinwry dwclliu; w�iu
shall also n�eet the mi�umum staudards of tlie Uniform Huusing Code. Ceni6cation by appropri�te utiliry providers ol'•rvailabiliry ul',utticien�
water, sewer and/or sepdc services to the propused ADU, must be provided as p•rrt of'the applicatiuu.
4. Side yard setback for a comer lot for diat portion of the Iot not adjaceut w the prin�rry vehiculrr rrcess is IU 1'ert, otlierwi,e tive tert.
5. Refer to Chapter 19.125 FWRC, Outdoors, Yanis, and Landscapiug, for appropriate requiren�rnts.
�(. f�VRC I9.265A10 eontains regulations rcgarding other •recessory uses, facililies aud activities associared with this usr. Huine ucrup;,iions
are not allowed in an ADU.
8 z, ADUs may be accessed through the eutrance to the primary dwelling w�it or through uu rdditioual entrance ou Uie side or rcar ul'thc
resiJeuce. Only one enaance is allowed on the front of tlie residence.
9$. The propeny owner must reside in either the primary dwelling unit or ADU for six nwudis or more uf each c�leudar year, aud ;�t uo tiu,e
receive rent or other compe�tsatiou for the owneo-occupied unit.
�N 1. �4+rT,�l g ADU_excludin�raYe . workshon, and similar non-liviny arcas. shall contaiu betweeu 3UU-8U0 sq. tl., bu� shnll uot excecd -10� �
of die sq. R. of the primary dwelling uuit. excluding,yaraee. workshop. and similur nou-livi�y areas. The uuit shall I�ave uo more th:m t�� ��
bedroonu. �
�F-F �( . Nu nwre tlrru oue siugle I�ousekeeping uuit may occupy an ADU. �
Prucess I, il, III aud IV are described iu
Chapter 19.55 PWRC,
Chapter 19.6U FWttC.
Cl�apier 1��.65 f'Wt2C,
Clmpter 19J0 FWRC respectively.
For other iufornution about parkiug aud parkiug areas, see Chapter 19.I30 FWkC. ��
Fur deiail, of wh•ri umy exceed this hright limit, see PWCZC Iy.t I OASU et sry.
Pur �lctails rcgardiug requireJ yards, see F14kC 19.1?5.160 et sey.
K�20U9 Cudr Amrndments4lUU aud Appr�isal ClurificatiunV'lanning CunuuissiunlADU\StatTi'e�wit and pruposrd language\Lxhibit D Rrvistd RS Chait.duc
� �
�
i
aar
�
ar
�
19.200.1$0 Accessory dwelling units. (Continued)
USE ZONE CHART
z DIRECT10N5: FIRST, read down to find use ... THEN, across for REGULATIONS
O Minimums Ma ximum s
a Re uired Yards ZO�
� � v
� � � � RS
a � � � � �,
� " ' ° � SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES
USE � �' '> � G � a v ,�ou ° ��;2
u � � ..°� u�`'. � a' .g ]C � a a
� J�.. Application for un ADU perniit shall be made ro the department of community develupment services in
accordance with the permit procedures adopted by the department, and shall inciuJe a letter or upplicatiun tiuin thr
owner(s) stating that the uwner(�) shall uccupy on of the dwelling units on the premises, except tin• buna lidr
temporary absences, li�r six niondis ur more uf the calendar ycar. An AllU application shall alsu be tile�i as :i ilerd
restriction with the King C:uunry department oC recurds anJ �lections to inclicate thc presence uf �n AL)U, thc
requirement uf owner occupancy, and other standards f'or maintaining th� unit as describrd in this Codr.
Cancellation of an ADUs rcgisu•ation may be uccomplished by die owner tiling a Ietter with the dep�runrnt ul'
cummunity �levelupmcnt services l'or recurding at the dep�rtment ul'records and electiuns, ur may urcur as a result
of an enforcement action.
�i3 ] 2. For sign requirements that apply to ehe project, see Chapter 19.14U FW RC.
+4 13. ADUs are not permitted un cluster subdivision lou under FWI2C 18.55.04U(7) ur within cotwgr huusing
un�er Chapter 19,25U �WItC.
-1-3 l4. For pruvisions that relate w the keeping otanimals, see Chapter 19.2G0 I��VRC.
Process 1, II, 1l1 and IV are described in Far other iufortnation about parkiug and parkuigareas, see Chapter 19,130 FWRC.
Ch•rpter 19.55 FWRC,
Cliapter 19.G0 �WRC,
Chaprer 19.65 FWRC, Fur Jetuils of' what may exceed tl�is lieight litnit, see FWRC 19.110.u5p et xey.
Chapter 19.70 FWRC respectively. Fur details reganfin reyuired yrrds, see fiWRC 19.125.16U et seq.
K\.u09 Code .4mcndnxme\AUU wid Apprais�l Claritication\Ylunniug Cummissirn7`.ADU\Jwll'rrpurt .wd piupu>rJ Inuguage\firLiLi� If kevised R3 (Y�cntdu.
�
�
�
W
�
�
�
�
�
�
i
�c+L�
�
�
���� � ��
From: Tina Piety RA+�E � �� ' �.Q
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 9:03 AM
To: Biil McCaffrey; Sob Cooper; Bob Roper; Brant A. Schweikl; Brett Thomas; CF a�C
Weiser; Chris Carrel; Christine Balyeat; Connie Boyle; Dale A. Roper; Dan Biles; Dan
Coxall; Darla Morin; Dave Matafin; Dave Thorstad; Dennis Haneberg; Don Perry ;
Gareth Roe; Garrett Nuffman; Gary Hering; Gary Martindale; Gil Hulsmann; Hans
Korve; Haynes Lund; Heidi Swartz; James Pate; Jeff Greene; Jeff Oliphant; Jennifer
Dovey;lerry Heinz;lim Jordan; John Bowman; John Norris; Jon Potter; Julie Ramseth;
Koong Cho; Kurt Wilson; Mark Clirehugh; Mark Freitas; Mel Easter; Mike Bailey; Mike
Behn; Mike Hovland; Monte PoweH; Paui Lymberis; Paul Manzer; Peter Townsend;
Randy L1oyd; Rick Olson; Rob Aigner; Rob Rueber; Rod Leland; Ron Biesold; Ron
Tremaine; Sam Pace; Scott Rhodes; Sheppard Cutler; Sid White; Steve Hammer; Steve
Kelly; Tim Atkins; Tim Osborne; 7odd Suchan; Tom Barghausen; Tom Pierson; Tom
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Raymond; Tony Starkovich; Tres Kirkebo
Matt Herrera; Margaret Clark; Greg Fewins; Isaac Conlen; Cary Roe; Ken Miller; Lee
Bailey; William Appleton
Notice of Federal Way Planning Commission
Notice of Public Hearing.doc
Helto Federal Way Stakeholders,
On February 17, 2010, the Federal Way Planning Commission wi11 hold a public hearing on proposed
amendments to the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRCj regarding: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) size
calculation; clarification of appraisal requirements; and short subdivision notice requirements. Please see the
attached notice for specific information. Please address any questions and/or comments to Associate Planner
Matt Herrera at 253-835-2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway com.
Ti,rt,a.�i.ety, �td:vna,vLi�tra�'we�A�i%tan.tll
Community Development Services
City of Federal Way
Street: 33325 8th Avenue South
Mail: PO Box 9718
�edera! Way, WA 98063
253-835-2601; Fax 253-835-2609
EXHIBIT C
Stakeholders List
Updated February 2010
Bob Cooper
Lloyd Enterprises Inc.
PO Box 3889
Federai Way, WA 98063-3889
bobctu�l, laydentelprisesinc.com
Chris Carrel
Friend of the Hylebos
PO Box 24971
Federal Way, WA 98093
ccarceita?att.biackberr -.y net
Dan Biies
SBI Developing
PO Box 73790
Puyailup, WA 98373
danb(a'�soundbui Itlio mes_c � m
Kurt Wilson
SBI Developing
PO Box 73790
Puya(lup, WA 98373
(253)539-8i1b
kurt�sotmdbuilthomes. corn
Darla Morin
Harsch Investment Properties
13010 NE 20�' Street, Suite 4�0
Beitevue, WA 98005
(425) 284-5352
darlatnnharsch.com
Julie Ramseth
Harsch Investment Properties
13010 NE 20`� Street, Suite 450
Bellewe, WA 98005
(530)450-0778
jut ier�iv,harsch. com
Don Perry
Lakehaven Utility District
PO Box 4249
Federal Way, WA 98063
dperey�a,iakehaveaor�
Tim Osborne, PE
Lakehaven Utility District
31627 1�` Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)946-5540
tosbc�rne[ailakehaven.or�;
lohn Bo�cman
Lakehaven Litility District
PO Box 4249
Federai Way, WA 98063
(2�3)946-5401
�bo���nian u�lakehaven.orQ
������� ��
P'A�� � � �� 1 c�
Paul Manzer
Pacland Deveiopment Consulting
1123� SE 6` Street, Suite 220
Bellevue, WA 98004
(42�)453-9501
pmanzer(u'pac Eanri.com
Gii Hulsmann
Abbey Road Group Rod Leland
PO Box 1224 Federal Way Public Schools
Puyallup, WA 98371 31405 18`� Avenue South
(253)�35-3699 Federal Way, WA 98003
;ii.hulsman»l%abbeyroadgroup.com rleland(n?fwsd.wednet.eciu
Jennifer povey
W indermere
33405 6`" Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(206)423-8000
�5(�OVCV�f7i�i'1RC�
Sid White
Federal Way Public Schoois
1066 South 320�' Street
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)945-5935
Slk'�liLe(Q� F�L'�S.UfQ
John Norris
Norris Homes
20�3 Faben Drive
Mercer Island, �VA 98040
(206) 27�-i901
j oli:�i�o rr i s!n? c o inc as t. ne t
Steve Keliy
ESM Consulting Engineers
3391� 1'` Way South, Suite 200
Federal �Vay, WA 98003
(253)838-6113
Steve.keil�•i�:esmcivil.com
Mark Clirehugh
G V A Kidder, Mathews, Segner
1201 Pacific Avenue, #1400
Tacoma, WA 98402
(2�3)722-141b
ma rcke�'c�;�� ktn.com
Paul Lymberis
Quadrant Homes
PO Box 130
8ellevue, WA 98009
(425) 452-6556
F'a u I.l vmt��ri s;u�q i�adra�itl�omes.com
Ron Biesold
South King Fire & Rescue
31617 1�` Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(206) 227-9301
Ron. biesotd�a'southkinRfire.or�
Tom Raymond
South King Fire & Rescue
31617 I Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)946-7241
Tum.ravmond!a, sout�inafire. or�
Tom Pierson
Federal Way Chamber of Commerce
PO Box 4220
Federai Way, WA 98063
(253)838-2605
tomp�u� federa lcva yc ha rnhc;r. ca m
Sam Pace
Sea/King County Assoc of Reattors
29839 154`" Avenue SE
Kent, WA 98fl42-45�7
(253)630-5�41
sampace�a;conce�itric. net
[G4009 Code AmendinentsWDU and Appraisal Clarificatiun�Planning Commusion�.aDU'•Staff repurt and propostd language\Exfiba C StakehoMas List doc Page 1 of 3
Ron Tremaine
Redstone Development
Land Acquisition and Development
17417 433` Street SE
North Bend, WA 98045
redstoneron(a?liotmail.com •
425-83 i-7730 (wk)
206-353-1761 (celt)
425-831-7783 (fax)
Monte Powell
Powelt Homes
29607 8'� Avenue South
Pederal Way, WA 98003
monte(cr?powell-homes.com
Ganett J. Huffman
Master Builders Associarion
of King/Snohomish Counties
33� 116`� Avenue SE
Beilewe, WA 98004
ehut�man rc mbaks.com
425-460-8236 (MBAKS)
Brant A. Schweikl, P.E.
Managing Member
Schweikl and Associates, PLLC
705 South 9'� Street, Suite 303
Tacoma, WA 98405
bschiveikl(c�sacivil. net
253-272-4451 � (wk)
253-272-4495(fax)
Mike Behn
Quadrant, Development Manager
14725 SE 36�' Street, Suite #200
PO Box 130
Bellevue, WA 98009
mi kz. behn�,c�uadranthomes.com
425-452-6563
42�-753-4866(cell)
Hans Korve
726 Auburn Way North
Auburn, WA 98032
hans c�d -inc.us
253-383-2200
Bob Roper
bob.roper(aJcomcast.net
253-94i-6954
Dale A Roper
The Roper Company
Landscape Architecture/Site Planning
8 t 6 Cherry Avenue, #3A
��������
Sumner, VV A 98390 Mark � , y � �.. ', r
2 �;-89 ( -1030 33� 16� �i!`��
2�3-826-3891 (fax) Federal Way, �VA 95003
r�operdale�u'•aoi.con� 2�3-838-8327
markfccicniir;�s.cncr
Gary Herin�
I439 SW 296 Street
Federal Way, �VA 98023
�; lit zrin,ta:c��nicast.�iet
Tim Atkins
Big Mountain Entetprises
ti�nia'6it;mountaict:;n#.com
PO Box 100 i
Enumc(aw, WA 98022
Biil McCaffrey
WJM Studio
1911 S W Campus Drive, Suite 116
Federat Way, WA 98023
ti�jmcca ftiey("a�coincast.n�t
Tom Barghausen
Barghausen Consulting Engineers
1821� 72" Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
tbarehausenf"a,�bar�hausen.com
Peter Townsend
1648 South 310` Street, Suite 6
Federal Way, WA 98003
253-839-2947
ctG: Ct��Ci �711Z.COIII
Auburn, WA 98032
Mike Baily
LDG Architects
i319 Dexter Avenue, Suite 260
Seattle, WA 98t09
206-283-4764
nii keiaz i ci �arch itec ts. co m
Tres Kukebo
Apex En�ineerin�
260i 3� Street, Suite 200
Tacoma, WA 98409
2�3-473-4494
kirkebo ii�apexen�inecrint;.net
Dennis Haneberg
Apex En�ineering
2601 35� Street, Suite 200
Tacoma, WA 98409
253-473-4494
hanberg(wapexen��nee ring. nc t
Gary Martindale
The Commons of Federal �Vay
1928-B South Commons Blvd
Federal Way, WA 98003
253-839-6156
gmartindale(a�xcaf ic�.com
Jeff Greene
Greene Gasaway Architects
PO Box 4158
Federal Way, WA 93063-�11�8
253-941-4937
jeffg�arch4 seanet.�om
Steve Hammer
Browleit Peterson Hammer
Architects
6920 220�` SW, Suite 200
Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043
sieve�abpharch.com
Chad Weiser
OTAK
10236 NE Points Drive, Suite 400
Kirkland, WA 98033-7897
206-442-1359
et�ad_u_eiserf�fiotak.com �
Christine Balyeai
New Concept Homes
PO Box 1229
[ssaquah, WA 98027
l�cbal ti•eat{iz;:hotrliail.c�3m
Mel Easter
Johnson Braund Desi�n Group
15200 52 Avenue South, Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98188
206-766-8300
mele(c�,jbdg.com
Koong Cho
Royat Hospitality
(Hampton Inn)
15901 West Vailey Highway
Tukwiia, WA 98188
253-318-0908
koon��vcorncast. nLt
K:`3009 Code AmendmentsWDU a� Appraisa! ClarificationlPlamm�g CorrvnissroMADtP.Sta(f report and propoud language\Exhibd C Stakeholders List.doc Page 2 of 3
Jim Jordan
(Sa�haiie Hei�hts developer)
jr;arciar�;<i isoi�edia.con�i
Mike Hov(and
Hoviand Architects
900 Meridian Avenue East, Ste 408
Milton, VVA 9$3�4
ho varc h t!ri'c a mc ast. ne t
Dave Thorstad
406 South 289�' Place
Federal Way, WA 98003
ciltarc•hi c�c t'ri:comcast.net
Dan Coxall
Hammes Co.
(St. Francis Hospital)
132� �1�' Avenue, Suite 1035
Seaitle, WA 98101
dco�a lltn>hammeseo.e�m
Tony Starkovich
1611 9�' Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
42�-775-6552
vi�itaeecapital{�i-liatmail.com
Brett Thomas brett(a�n3ountainconst.com
Connie 8oyie connie.bovle(cicoliiers.com
Jan�es Pate jamesp(a harsch.com
JeffOliQhant jlo>S�aaol.com
Jerry Heinz jerry.heinz�weverhaeuser.cam
Jon Potter j�otter93ti�c�aol.com
Randy Lloyd randYtloy�n??cprint.blackberry.nct
Rick Olson RickOlson�!fhshealth.org
Rob Aigner roba�ra'harsch.com
Rob Rueber amieber("a',,comcast.net
Scott Rhodes rhodesarchitecturena �mail.com
Sheppard Cutler s�vcru�tishersons.com
Todd Suchan tsuchanta wildwaves.com
Gordon Olson Gordon.olsontai,southkin fire.or =
E�C���1�° I
Garet�"�f�i� �� ��" I�
BCRA
2106 Pacific Avenue, Suite 300
Tacoma, WA 98402
253-627-4367
�roe{a bcrades ign. co m
Heidi Swartz
Swartz Development
�724 30'� Avenue NE
Seattie, WA 9810�
(206) 730-6933 cell
(206) 527-8999 fax
hpswartzra?comcast. net
K CcKk Amendnxnts`�.ADU and Appraisal Clarif¢azionlPlanning Curtvnission\�D(PStaff report and proposed lar+guage\Exh3it C Stakehoidcrs Li%.doc Page 3 of 3
From: Tina Piety i..������ �
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:40 PM ����V� � C.p
To: Bili McCaffrey; Bob Cooper; Bob Roper; Brant A. Schweik ; re ad ��
Weiser; Chris Carrel; Christine Balyeat; Connie Boyle; Date A. Roper; Dan 8iles; Dan
Coxall; Daria Mor+n; Dave Matafin; Dave Thorstad; Dennis Haneberg; Don Perry ;
Gareth Roe; Garrett Huffman; Gary Hering; Gary Martindale; Git Hulsmann; Hans
Korve; Haynes Lund; Heidi Swartz;lames Pate;leff Greene; Jeff Oliphant; Jennifer
Dovey; Jerry Heinz; Jim Jordan; John Bowman; lohn Norris; Jon Potter; Julie Ramseth;
Koong Cho; Kurt Wiison; Mark Clirehugh; Mark Freitas; Mel Easter; Mike 8ailey; Mike
Behn; Mike Hoviand; Monte Powell; Paul Lymberis; Pau) Manzer; Pe#er Townsend;
Randy Lloyd; Rick Olson; Rob Aigner; Rob Rueber; Rod Leland; Ron Biesold; Ron
Tremaine; Sam Pace; Scott Rhodes; Sheppard Cutler; Sid White; Steve Hammer; Steve
Kelly; Tim Atkins; Tim Osborne; Todd Suchan; Tom Barghausen; Tom Pierson; Tom
Raymond; Tony Starkovich; Tres Kirkebo
Cc: Matt Herrera; Margaret Clark; Greg Fewins; isaac Conlen; Lee Bailey; Cary Roe; Ken
Miller; Marwan Salioum; Wiliiam Appieton
Subject: Federal Way Planning Commission
Attachments: Exhibit D Stakeholders List.doc; ADU Staff Report.doc; Exhibit A Revised SE
Chart.doc; Exhibit B Revised RS Chart.doc; Exhibit C Stakeholders list.doc; Exhibit F
Stakeholders tist.doc; Appraisal Staff Report.doc; Exhibit A Surface Water
Management 15.15.010.doc; Exh;bit B Subdivisions 18.55.060.doc; Exhibit C Chapter
19.30 Nonconformace.doc; Exhib+t D Development Improvements 19.135.030.doc;
Exhibit E Stakeholders List.doc; Notice Sign Staff Report.doc; Exhibit A Proposed
Language.doc; Exhibit e Stakeholders tist.doc; Exhibit C Stakehoiders List.doc
Heilo Federal Way Stakeholders,
On February 17th, the Federal Way Planning Commission will be holding public hearings on proposed
amendments to the Federa/ Way Revised Code (FWRCj regarding: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) size
calculation; clarification of appraisal requirements; and changes to short subdivision notice requirements.
Attached you will find the Planning Commission agenda and staff reports and exhibits for the proposed
amendments. if you have any questions, please contact Associate Planner Matt Herrera at 253-835-2638, or
matt.herrera@cityoffederals�vay cotn
_ __ —
r;,na��t,�t �ad�ww�tYaz�w��a�ta,�
Community Development Services
City of Federal Way
Street: 33325 8th Avenue South
Mail: PO Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063
253-835-2601; Fax 253-835-2609
EXHIBIT D
Stakeholders List
tipdated February 2010
Bob Cooper
Lioyd Enterprises Inc.
PO Box 3889
Federal Way, WA 98063-3889
bobc� lto, d�rprisesinc.co�n
Chris Carrel
Friend of the Hylebos
PO Box 24971
Federal Way, WA 9$093
ccarrei(ajau.blackberry. net
Dan Biles
SBI Developing
PO Box 73790
Puyallup, WA 98373
danb a�soundbuilthomes.com
Kurt Wilson
SBI Developing
PO Box 73790
Puyallup, WA 98373
(253)539-8116
kurt(�so�mdbuilthomes.conl
Darla Morin
Harsch Investment Properties
13010 NE 20"` Street, Suite 450
Bellevue, WA 98005
(425) 2845352
darlam��harsch.com
Julie Ramseth
Harsch Investment Properties
13010 NE 20'� Street, Suite 450
Bellevue, WA 98005
{530)450-0778
julierLa7harsch.com
Don Perry
Lakehaven Urility District
PO Box 4249
Federal Way, WA 98063
dpem+(a iakehaven.org
Tim Osborne, PE
Lakehaven Utility District
31627 1�` Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
{253) 946-5540
tosbome(a?lakehaven.or�
John Bowman
Lakehaven Utility District
PO Box 4249
Federal Way, WA 98063
(253) 946-5401
i bo �inian(a�iakehavenorg
E����1�'
PA�� i y �� �e
Paul Manzer
Pacland Devetopment Consulting
11235 SE 6 t1i Street, Suite 220
Bellevue, WA 98004
(425) 4�3-9501
pmanzerf �ac land. con�
Gil Hulsmann
Abbey Road Group Rod Leland
PO Box 1224 Federat Way Public Schools
Puyallup, WA 98371 31405 18`� Avenue South
(253) 435-3699 Federal Way, WA 98003
gil.huls►uannrabbe .ry aadgrou�.com rieland(a;fwsd.�+rednet.eclu
Jennifer povey
W indermere
33405 6'� Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(206) 423-80fl0
i sdove v,cu�vindermere.com
Sid White
Federal Way Public Schools
1066 South 320`� Street
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)945-5935
swhite(a),fir�s.or�,
John Norris
Norris Homes
2053 Faben Drive
Mercer Island, WA 98040
(206) 27�-1901
i o li nnonis�a?c oincast. net
Steve Kelly
ESM Consulting Engineers
339 t 5 1'` Way South, Suite 200
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)838-6113
Ste ve. kellv� esmc ivil.com
Mark Clirehugh
GVA Kidder, Mathews, Segner
120 i Pacific Avenue, #1400
Tacoma, WA 98402
(253)722-1416
marckc3ii;�va�m.com
Paul Lymberis
Quadrant Homes
PO 8ox 130
Bellevue, WA 98009
(425)452-6556
Paxil, (vmberisteirquadranthomes.com
Ron Biesold
South King Eire & Rescue
31617 l Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(206)227-9301
Ron.biesold(a?southl:in� Eire.or�
Tom Raymond
South King Fire & Rescue
31617 1 u Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98UO3
(253)946-7241
Tom.ra y moncit" [1>SOUIFI�ilila � [Ie.00�
Tom Pierson
Federal Way Chamber of Commerce
PO Box 4220
Federai Way, WA 98063
(253)838-2605
iomp� federalw•a4c}Za�ttlx;r.com
Sam Pace
Sea/King County Assoc of Realtors
29839 154"' Avenue SE
Kent, WA 98042-4�57
(253)630-5541
sampace(cr:ccmc�rltric_ net
K-�2009 Code AmendmentsWDU a� Appraisal Clari6cation�Plan�ing Commission�ADlPStaff report ard proposed Ianguage�Exhibit D Stakdrolders Lin.doc Page 1 of 3
E�N��1�' 1
Ron Tremaine
Redstone Deveiopment
Land Acquisition and Development
17417 433` Street SE
North Bend, WA 9804�
red�toneron��i itotmail.com
42�-831-7730 {wk)
206-3�3-1761 (cell)
42�-831-7783 (fax)
Monte Powell
Powell Homes
29607 8`� Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
monte �Upo�r•ell-homes.com
Garrett J. Huffman
Master Builders Associarion
of King/Snohomish Counties
335 116`� Avenue SE
Betlewe, WA 98004
�huffman n i��balcs.corn
42�-460-8236 (MBAKS)
Brant A. Schweikl, P.E.
Managing Member
Schweikl and Associates, PLLC
705 South 9`� Street, Suite 303
Tacoma, WA 98405
bsch ��•eikt(�c�sacii-ii. net
2�3-272-4451 (wk)
2�3-272-4495(fax)
Sumner, �VA 98390
2�3-391-(030
2��-826-339i (fax)
ro�erdalz��i aal.com
Gary Hering
1439 SW 296'� Street
Federal bt�'ay, WA 98023
aj l�e r i n o_; a;c o mcas t. net
Tim Atkins
Big Moimtain Enterprises
ti in�e: bigmouiitainent.com
PO Box 1001
Enumcla�v, �VA 98022
Bill McCaffrey
WJIvI Studio
1911 SW Campus Drive, Suite 116
Federai Way, ��A 98023
u�j mcca ffrc; v�ci 'coancast.net
Tom Barghausen
Barghausen Consulting Engineers
18215 72 Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
tbarehausen� i%�barzt�ausen. com
Peter To��nsend
1648 South 3 t0` Street, Suite 6
Federal Way, W� 98003
253-839-29=17
petert£�;�i n?e.com
Auburn, WA 98032
Mark Freitas lS �� I �
335l6 9` Avenue South
Federal Way, �VA 98003
253-838-8327
�narkfccimiu;cs.cam
Tres Kirkebo
Apex En�ineering
2601 35 Street, Suite 200
Tacoma, WA 98409
253-473-4494
kirkebo��apzxene in�erin�. net
Dennis Haneberg
Apex En�ineering
2601 35 Street, Suite 200
Tacoma, WA 98409
253-473-4494
hanberg�a apexe�igineering. net
Gary Martindate
The Commons of Federal Way
1928-B South Commons Blvd
Federal Way, WA 98003
253-839-6156
gmartincialeia%tcafu�.com
Jeff Greene
Greene Gasaway Architects
PO Box 4 t 58
Federal Way, WA 98063-4158
253-941-4937
j effg�archTc�seanet.co►n
Mike Behn
Quadrant, Development Manager
14725 SE 36�' Street, Suite #200
PO Box 130
Bellewe, WA 98009
mike.behn� quadranthomes.com
425-452-6563
425-753-4866(cell)
Hans Korve
726 Aubum Way North
Auburn, WA 98032
hans a?dmp-nic.us
253-383-2200
Bob Roper
bob.roper(a�comcast.net
253-941-6954
Dale A Roper
The Roper Company
Landscape Architecture/Site Planning
816 Cherry Avenue, #3A
Mike Baily
LDG Architects
1319 Dexter Avenue, Suite 260
Seattle, WA 98109
206-283-�1764
ntikL � u' 1 �l «arc h i Yec ts. com
Chad Weiser
OTAK
10236 NE Points Drive, Suite 400
Kirkland, VNA 95033-7897
206-442-13�9
ctiael. t��eisez�'ir'otak.com
Christine Balyeat
New Concept Homes
PO Box 1229
Issaquah, �VA 98027
l�cbat�-eat�u hot�r�ail.co�t�
Steve Hammer
Browleit Peterson Hammer
Architects
6920 220`� SW, Suite 200
Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043
sTeve�z?bnharch.com
Mel Easter
Johnson Braund Design Group
15200 52 Avenue South, Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98188
206-766-8300
mele ; jbdg.com
Koong Cho
Royal Hospitality
(Hampton Inn)
15901 West Valtey Highway
Tukwila, WA 98188
253
koon�;c,r �comcast.net
K?:009 Code Amendments4lDU and Appraisal Clarifica[ion',Planning fommissioo�ADU�Siaff reiwn and propostd language\Exhbit D Staketaidas List.doc P3F�,. C Z Of 3
Jim Jordan
(Saghaiie Heights developer)
�r j o rda i�t«� i s o tj�ed i a. c v nt
Mike Hoviand
Hovland Architects
900 Meridian Avenue East, Ste 408
Mitton, WA 983�4
hovarLht[ci>,comcast.net
Dave Thorstad
406 South 289�' Place
Federal Way, WA 98003
dltarchitect(cu;comcast_net
Dan Coxall
Hammes Co.
(St_ Francis Hospital)
132� 4` A��enue, Suite t03�
Seattle, WA 98 I O t
dcoxallta%ha nznie.co. � om
Tony Starkovich
1 b 1 t 9�' Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
425-775-6552
vin[a��capital(i?hotniai i.com
Brett Thomas brett,'�i)mountainconst.com
Connie Boyte connie.bovle�i,coiliers.com
James Pate jamesp�aharsch.con�
Jeff Oliphant jlo>5(alaol.com
Jerry Heinz je .heinz a),we�rhaeuser.com
Jon Potter j�tter936�cUaol.com
Randy Lioyd randyllovd ct?xp�•int.blackben
Rick Olson RickOlsonfa?fl�shealth.or�
Rob Aigner roba�;uharsct�.cam
Rob Rueber am�eberr�comcast.net
Scott Rhodes rhodesarchitecture�a gmail.com
Sheppard Cutler swc(c�tishersons.com
Todd Suchan tsuchan{"a`wiidwaves.com
Gordon Olson Ciordon.otson�wisouthkin�fire.org
EX�����' �
B��G� � � �� �
Z 106 Pacific Avenue, Suite 300
Tacoma, WA 98402
253-627-4367
groe(d-bc cades i v n. co m
fieidi Swartz
Swartz Development
5724 30'� Avenue NE
Seattle, WA 9810�
(206) 730-6933 cell
(206) 527-8999 f�
hps wartz�a�comcas t. ne t
K"_O(i9 Cude Amendmen�slADU a� Appraisal ClarificationlPlanning CommissanlADlilStaffropon and poposed Ianguage�Exhbit D Stakdwtders List.doc Page 3 of 3
C[TY' OF FEDERaL WaY
PLANNING COMMISSION
February 17, 2010 City Hall
7:00 p.m. Council Chambers
MEETING MINUTES
Commissioners present: Merle Pfeifer, Hope Elder, Sarady Long, Lawson Bronson, Wayne Carlson, Tom
1�tedhurst, and Tim O'Neil. Commissioners absent: none. Staff present: Planning Manager Isaac Conlen,
Senior Planner Margaret Clark, Assistant City Attorney Peter Beckwith, and Administrative Assistant Tina
Chair Pfeifer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of January 20, 2010, were approved as written.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
Commissionner Carlson commented that two Federal Way residents won Sitver and Bronze metals this last
w•eekend at the Olympic Games. He feels the city should consider acknowledging their achievement. Mr.
Conlen replied that Mayor Kochmar had noted the same at last night's City Council meeting and stated
that some sort of recognition and or ceremony will be p(anned.
AD�i[NISTRAT[VE REPORT
Mr. Conlen noted that Associate Planner Matt Herrera, who was scheduled to deliver tonight's staff reports
is out sick. Mr. Conlen and Ms. Clark will be delivering the staff reports. As an FYI to the Commission,
Mr. Conlen reported that the 23` Avenue Condos/Skyway Hotel (a mixed-use project with residential,
hotei, office, and retail) is in the preapplication phase. They are planning two towers, one approximately
400 feet in height and the second approximately 200 feet in height.
COM1YlISSION BUSINESS
PUBLiC HEARING — Accessory Dwelling Unit Size Calculations
Mr. Conlen delivered the staff report. The proposed code amendments will clarify what portions of the
structure should be included in the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) size calculation; remove the 15,000
square foot lot size threshold for detached� ADUs; and make housekeeping amendments to ADU use zone
charts. Current FWRC regulations do not clearly define what areas are included in the ADU size
calculation. The proposed amendment would specifically exclude garages, workshops, and similar non-
living areas from the ADU size calculation. Removal of the 15,000 square foot lot size threshold would
allo�v detached ADUs on all lots.
Sa�ne Pace, Seattle/King County Association of Realtors — He commented that the association
supports the proposed amendments. 1) They support the removal of the 15,000 square foot
threshotd because it is inconsistent �vith the lots available in Federal Way. 2) The prescriptive
provisions are dysfunctional. 3) The proposed amendments pass the common sense test. 4) The
proposed amendments retain protections that ADUs �vill be smaller in size than the principal �
C�.Documents arid Stttings'unatth��.Local Sntings\Te,rywrarylntemet F'iles\Contwt.Omiook\LLX'_CF8V'�.�teeting Surterary 02-! 7-10 (2).doc ��� ��'�
PAGE_�,0��_
Plannin,� Com�ni�sion i�Iinutes Page 2 February 17, ?O10
buildin�.
Com�nissioner O'Neil asked if there can be a breeze�vav to a detached ADU, or �r that be considered
an attached ADU. Mr. Conlen replied that as lon� as it is a non-structural, non-supportinj breezeway, the
ADU woutd be considered detached. It is possible the building could be so close together that the city
woutd consider the ADU to be attached.
Commissia�er O'Neil asked if the ADU could be rented. Couid an owner build an ADU for the sole purpose
of renting it out as a financial venture? Mr. Conlen replied that an owner cou(d build an ADU for the sole
purpose of renting it out as a financial venture. The Federa! 6Yay Revised Code {FWRC) does require the
owner to live on the property, either in the principal residence or the ADU_ Commissioner Long asked how
this can be enforced. Mr. Beckwith replied that most enforcement in the city is compliant based, meaning
that if someone compiains about who is living in an ADU, the city will research the issue. Mr. Conlen
commented that the owner is required to sign a document that runs with the land stating the owner will dwell
on the properly.
Commissioner O'Neil asked for a clarification of what is meant by average building elevation the height of
the structure and grade. Mr. Conlen explained the terms. He also stated that an ADU cannot exceed the
height of the principal structure.
Commissioner Long asked how may ADUs has the city approved. Ms. Clark replied that the city had a lot
of existing ADUs �vhen we incorporated. T'he ciry worked with the owners to bring them into compliance.
Since the city incorporated there have been only approximately � new ADUs, bringing the total of new and
existing to 25 to 30 ADUs. Commissioner Long commented that since it is likely that more than one car
will be parked on a lot, does the city anticipate any parking issues`? Mr. Conlen replied that typically there
is adequate room for parking.
Commissioner Carison moved {and it was secondec� to recommended adoption of the staff's
recommendation for the proposed amendments for the Accessory D�velting Unit Size Calculation. The
motion carried unanimously. The public hearing �vas closed,
PUS[.[C HEaRtNG — ClariGcation of Appraisal Requirements
Ms. Clark delivered the staff report. The intent of the proposed amendments is to clarify and make
consistent who is authorized to conduct an appraisai. There are ten sections of the FWRC that require an
appraisal. Of those, two require ar� MAI appraisal, which is a professional accreditation by the Appraisal
Institute, a private association of real estate appraisers. The remaining eight require an appraisa.l that is,
"acceptabie to the city." In addition, the city may require a second appraisal if the valuation of the first is
considered inappropriate. Staff proposes that the language be changed to require the appraisal be
performed by a state certified appraiser. Language allowing the city to request a second appraisal will be
removed.
Same Pace, Seattle/King Counry Association of Realtors — He commented that the association
supports the proposed amendments. 1) They are pleased the proposed amendments remove
inconsistencies. 2) They are pleased the proposed amendments leave in the choice of an
assessment or appraisal. 3) The proposed amendments ensure the appraiser meets the highest legal
standard. 4) The proposed amendments minimize the potenrial for a second appraisal. 5) The
proposed amendments are efficient and reduce costs.
Commissioner Long asked with the requirement of a state certified appraiser, is it iikeiy the owner would
C:iDocumemsandSettings�matth�LocalSrnings\Tatg�orarylmernaFiks\Contem.0utboklLLli'_CF8V\MeetingSumnary02-17-10(2�doc ������� �
--���.w
PA�E�_0�_ �f___
Planning Conunission Minutes Page 3 Febivary 17, 20i0
want to use an appraiser certified by another state. Ms. Clark replied the city would require a Washington
state appraiser.
Same Pace, Seattle/King County Association of Realtors — He commented that the state requires
that the state certified appraiser be geo-competent, which �vould be unlikely �vith an out-of-state
appraiser.
Commissioner Medhurst why is the city giving the choice of an assessed value or an appraisal, why not
just the assessed value? Ms. Clark replied that city wants to be flexible and give applicants a choice. She
noted that the proposed amendments do not address the issue if a choice should be available, but simply
clarify who is authorized to conduct an appraisal.
Commissioner Bronson expressed concern that the city may question the appraised value; specifically, that
a staff member without appraisal experience may question an experience appraiser. Ms. Clark replied that
staff would only question an appraisal that was unreasonable and would have to have a reason to question
the appraisal. If a question arose, a state certified appraiser would be hired to perform the second appraisal.
Same Pace, Seattle/King County Association of Realtors — He commented that an assessment is
done once a year {with an appeal period). If the economy changes, by the time the owner applies to
the city, the value may have changed. In such a case, an owner may be better off submitting an
appraised value as opposed to the assessed value.
Commissioner Bronson moved to recommended adoption of the staffls recommendation for the proposed
amendments to Clarify the Appraisal Requirements. The motion carried unanimously. The public hearing
was closed.
PUB[.[C HEAR[NG — Short Subdivision Notice Requirements
Ms. Clark delivered the staff report. Current FWRC regulations require the posting of three onsite notice
boards on or near the subject property. The proposed amendment would reduce the requirement to one
onsite board, with the abiiity to post additional boards if needed_ Three onsite notice boards are not
necessary as many properties only abut one right-of-way. The proposed amendrnent would reduce costs
associated with providing notice boards and staff time to post boards. The proposed amended language
would require additional notice boards to be posted if staff finds that they are needed to clearly identify the
property.
Same Pace, Seattle/King County Association of Realtors — He commented that the association
supports the proposed amendments. 1) A short subdivision may be a division into only two lots
and the requirement for three notices boards is excessive in such instances. 2) The proposed
amendment fits smaller lots, of which there are many in Federa( Way. 3) The "if needed"
language referring to additiona( notice boards is ambiguous, but the Association is wiliing to wait
to see how it works. 4) The notice board is not the only notice given.
Commissioner Carlson commented that he supports the proposed amendment and that the only downside
he sees is the city may receive complaints that one notice board is not adequate notice. Commissioner
O'Neit asked what happens if a notice board is defaced. Ms. Clark responded that if the city is told, the
board would be replaced.
Commissioner O'Neil moved to recommended adoption of the staff's recommendation for the proposed
amendments to Short Subdivision Notice Requirements. The motion carried unanimously. The public
C:1Docvmrnts a�d Senings`�rt�a�th�,l.ocal Sniings?Tertq�orary 1Manet FilalContrnt.0utlook�LLX2CF8WNeaing Swmiary 02-17-10 (?I doc EXH� � IT �
PAGE=�� f'
Planning Conunission i�tinutes Page 4 February 17, 2010
hearing �vas closed.
ADDIT[ONAL BUSINESS
Staff anticipates there �vii( be no meetings in March. The 2010 Planning Commission Work Program will
go before the City Council on March 16`
AUDIENCE COMMENT
Same Pace, Seattle/King Counry Association of Realtors — He commented that the city has a good list of
stakeholders.
ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
C:\DocumenuandSatings�.mazch\LocalSettings'.Taiq�orarylnternaFiles��Contmt.0utbok\LI.X2CFSVU�teetingSumrtnry0�-17-101'Idoc ������� �
PAGE _ t L_.�_d ��_
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) amending �'WRC 19.195.180 and 19.200.180.
(Amending Ordinance Nos. 07-545, 02-424, O1-381, 97-291, and 95-245.)
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the need to periodically modify Title 19 of the Federal
Way Revised Code (FWRC), "Zoning and Development Code," in order to conform to state and
federal law, codify administrative practices, clarify and update zoning regulations as deemed
necessary, and improve the efficiency of the regulations and the development review process;
�
WHEREAS, this ordinance, containing amendments to development regulations and the
text of Title 19 FWRC, has complied with Process VI review, chapter 19.80 FWRC, pursuant to
chapter 19.35 FWRC; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the City Council to adopt new amendments for
the FWRC which establishes development regulations for excluding garages, workshops, and
similar non-living areas from the size calculation of an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) within
the City of Federal Way; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the City Council to adopt new amendments for
the FWRC which establishes development regulations removing the 15,000 square foot lot size
limitation for a detached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADL�; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the City Council to adopt new housekeeping
amendments for the FWRC which removes duplicative and irrelevant.language; and
WHEREAS, an Environmental Threshold Determination was not necessary as the
amendment is related solely to governmental procedures and therefore, categorically exempt
from the State Environmental Policy Act; and
Ordinance No. 10- PaSe 1 o.r8
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission properly conducted a duly noticed public hearing
on these code amendments on February 17, 2010, and forwarded a recommendation of approval;
and
WHEREAS, the Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) of the Federal Way City
Council considered these code amendments on March 1, 2010, and recommended adoption of
the text amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findin�s. The City Council of the City of Federal Way makes the following
findings with respect to the proposed amendments.
(a) These code amendments are in the best interest of the residents of the City and will
benefit the City as a whole by providing clarification of areas to be included in the Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU) size calculation, providing additional housing opportunities for property
owners with lot sizes less than 15,000 square feet, and providing housekeeping amendments to
remove inaccurate and irrelevant information.
(b) . These code amendments comply with Chapter 36.70A RCW, Growth Management.
(c) These code amendments are consistent with the intent and purpose of Title 19 FWRC
and will implement and are consistent with the applicable provisions of the Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan.
(d) These code amendments bear a substantial relationship to, and will protect and not
adversely affect, the public health, safety, and welfare.
(e) These code amendments have followed the proper procedure required under the FWRC.
Ordinance No. 10- Page 2 o,f 8
Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to chapter 19.80 FWRC and chapter 19.35 FWRC, and
based upon the recitals and the findings set forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council
makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the
adoption of the proposed amendments:
(a} The proposed FWRC amendments are consistent with, and substantially implement, the
following Federal Way Comprehensive Plan goals and policies:
LUP4 — Maximize efficiency of the development review process.
LUP6 — Conduct regular reviews of the development regulations to determine how to
improve upon the permit review process.
HP3 — Continue to allow accessory housing units within single-family neighborhoods
in a way that protects residential character, maintains specific design standards, and
complies with all applicable laws. Review accessory housing regulations and, if
necessary, revise any regulation that inappropriately limits their development.
(b) The proposed FWRC amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health,
safety, and welfare because it will remove ambiguity regarding what is and is not included in
maximum Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADt� squaxe footage. Additionally, the proposed
amendment allows those homeowners with adequate lot sizes the ability to construct a detached
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADL�.
(c) The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the public and the residents of the
City of Federal Way because it provides clarity to an existing code provision and provides
homeowners the ability to construct a detached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) if the
underlying lot contains the prescribed minimum density standards.
Ordinance No. 10- Page 3 of 8
Section 3. FWRC 19.195.180 is hereby amended to read as follows:
USE ZONE CHART
z DIItECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use ... THEN, across for REGULATIONS
� Minimums Maximums
d y Rec uired Yards �, ZONE
a � „ � p
� a c�i v o� .� v R' i ► SL'
a � N � � � �=�
. � ; v� c � � U �° ° • o'• �
USE r� a a w � � � x� � a SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES
Accessory �reeess See 30 ft. ] 0 ft. 10 ft. See 30 ft. See-AFete 1. An accessory dwelling unit (ADU) shall meet the definition outlined in FWRC 19.05.010. Minimum lot size for ADUs is Uased
dwelling � note 1 note 2 above 3 upon the minimum lot size for the exisring primary dwelling unit as set forth in FWRC 19.195A10. '''"° -��°�-�� -�'�' °�°° `�
unit (ADU) None average 1 Parkin¢ �`x'D� '° i nc m n:., c,..e ..,,,.e..
in single- building Space 2. Only one ADU may be created per subject property. The ADU, accessory structuTes and the primary dweliing unit together shall
family elevation not exceed the maximum lot coverage prescribed in FWRC 19195A10.
residences 3. An ADU shall be designed so that, to the degree reasonably feasible, the appearance of the building remains that of a single-family
residence. The design and size of an ADU and the primary dwelling unit shall conform to all applicable standards in the zoning,
building, plumbing electrical, mechanical, fire, health, and any other applicable codes, as required for any new construction. All
ADUs and primary dwelling units shall also meet the minimum standards of the Uniform Housing Code. Certification by appropriate
utility providers of availability of sufficient water, sewer and/or septic services to the proposed ADU, must be provided as part of the
applicallon.
4. Refer to Chapter 19.125 FWRC, Outdoors, Yards, and Landscaping, for appropriate requirements.
� _va � _ ,... � nr T . . . ,
6 5 FWRC 19.265.010 contains regulations regarding home occupations and other accessory uses, facilities and activities associated
with this use. Home occupations are not allowed in an ADU.
� 6. ADUs may be accessed through the entrance to the primary dwelling unit or through an additional entrance on the side or rear o1'
the residence. Only one entrance is allowed on the front of the residence.
8 7. The property owner, musk reside in either the primary dwelling unit or ADU for six months or more of each calendar year, and at
no rime receive rent or other compensation for the owner-occupied unit.
4 8. t�t � ADU, excluding any garage, workshop and similar non-livin ag reas• shall contain between 300 — 800 sq. ft., but shall not
exCeed 40% of the sq. ft. of the primary dwelling uni� excludinE Qara ge, workshop and similar non areas. The unit shall have no more
than two bedrooms.
�8 9. No more than one single housekeeping unit may occupy an ADU.
�-k 1�. Application for an ADU permit shall be made to the department of community development services in accordance with the
permit procedures adopted by the department, and shall include a letter of application from the owner(s) stating that the owner(s) shall
occupy one of the dwelling units on the premises, except for bona fide temporary absences, for six months or more of the calendar
year. An ADU applicarion shall also be filed as a deed restriction with the King County deparirnent of records and elections to
indicate the presence of an ADU, the requirement of owner occupancy, and other standards for maintaining the unit as described in
this Code. Cancellafion of an ADUs registration may be accomplished by the owner filing a letter with the department of community
development services for recording at the department of records and elections, or may occur as a result of an enforcement action.
� i l. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Chapter 19.140 FWRC.
� 3 12. ADUs are not permitted on cluster subdivision lots under FWRC 18.55.040(7).
-1-4 13. For rovisions that relate to the kee in of animals, see Cha ter 19.260 FWRC.
Process I, II, til and IV are described in
Chapter 19.55 FWRC, For other informarion about parking and parking areas, see Chapter 19.130 FWRC.
Chapter 19.60 FWRC,
Chapter 19.65 FWRC, For details of what may exceed this height limit, see FWRC 19.110.050 et seq.
Chapter 19.70 FWRC respecdvely. For details regarding required yards, see FWRC 19. t 25.160 et seq.
Ordinance No. 10- Page 4 of 8
� . Rev 1/10 LU
Section 4. FWRC 19.200.180 is hereby amended to read as follows:
USE ZONE CHART
z DIRECTIONS: FIItST, read down to find use ... THEN, across far REGULATIONS
O Minimums Ma�cimums
� R uired Yards ZONE
a y �,
� ; " , RS
w ° �° `"
x � w a
a o � °� a� �on
usE � �-> �' � ro � � � '�.�� SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES
N O � � � Y
u � a"' a w` cn a"' a � v� r� c`�..
AcCessory �esess See In RS 35.0 zones: See 30 ft. See-�isEe-C 1• An accessory dwelling unit (ADU) shall meet the definition outlined in FWRC 19.05.010. Minimum lot size for attesHe& ADUs is based
dwelling � note 1 20 $. 10 ft. 10 ft. note aboVe 1 Parkine upon the minimum lot size for the exis6ng primary dwelling unit as set forth in FWRC 19.200.010.
unit None Otherwise: 2 average �ace ° ' �
ADU m bUildin Z• On�Y one ADU may be created per subject property. The ADU, accessory structures and the primary dwelling unit together shall not exceed
� � 20 ft. See 5 ft. g ihe maximum lot coverage prescnbed in FWRC 19.200.010, as follows:
single- no � elevation a. In RS 35.0 = 50%
family q b. In RS I5.0 = 50%
residenCes a In RS 9.6 = 60°/a
d. In RS 7.2 = 60%
e. In RS 5.0 = 60%
f. See FWRC 19.110.020(2)(b) for calculation of lot coverage for flag lots.
3. An ADU shall be designed so that, to the degree reasonably feasible, the appearance of the building remains that of a single-family
residence. The design and size of an ADU and Uie primary dwelling unit shall conform to all applicable standards in the zoning, building,
plumbing, electrical, mechanical, fire, health, and any other applicable codes, as requued for any new construction. All ADUs and primary
dwelling units shall also meet the minimum standards of the Uniform Housing Code. Certification by appropriate utility providers of
availability of sufficient water, sewer and/or septic services to the proposed ADU, must be provided as part of the appfication.
4. Side yard setback for a comer lot for that portion of the bt not adjacent ro the primary vehicular access is 10 feet, otherwise five feet.
5. Refer to Chapter 19.125 FWRC, Outdoors, Yards, and Landscaping, for appropriate requirements.
€er-ai+-,4�BH- . . . ,
� 6. FWRC 19.265.010 contains regulations regarding other accessory uses, facilities and activities associated with this use. Home occupations
are not allowed in an ADU.
S 7. ADUs may be accessed tlutough the entrance to the primary dwelling unit or through an addidonal enh�ance on the side or rear of the
residence. Only one enhance is allowed on the front of the residence.
9 8. The property owner must reside in either the primary dwelling unit or ADU for six rrronths or more of each calendar year, and at no time
receive rent or other compensation for the owner-occupied unit
�8 9. �arThe ADU, excludinggaraee . workshop. and similaz non-living areas, shall contain between 300-800 sq. R., but shall not exceed 40 %
of the sq. ft. of the primary dwelling unit excluding earaee, workshop. and similar non-livine areas. The unit shall have no more than two
bedrooms.
1-� 10. No more than one single housekeeping unit may occupy an ADU.
Continued
Process I, [I, III and IV are described in For other information about parking and parking areas, see Chapter 19.130 FWRC.
Chapter 19.55 FWRC,
Chapter 19.60 FWRC,
Chapter 19.65 FWRC, For details of what may exceed this height limit, see FWRC 19.110.050 et seq.
Chapter ]9.70 FWRC respectively. For details regarding required yards, see FWRC 19.125.160 et seq.
Ordinance No. !0- Page 5 of 8
Rev 1/ I 0 LU
19.200.180 Accessory dwelling units. (Continued)
USE ZONE CHART
z DIRECTIONS: FIItST, read down to find use ... THEN, across for REGULATIONS.
O Minimums Ma�cimums
� Re uired Yards ZONE
� y y
W °' RS
c� � �
G� � � F a
� o � .o �
f1. � V N
� �3 N � 0 3 �'c
'� .� zn ,. U � � � •-
LiSE �� o � ; � o �;, � g� SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES
u � c ..� w rTi c: a x v, cG a
� 11. Application for an ADU permit shall be made to the department of community development services in
accordance with the permit procedures adopted by the department, and shall include a letter of application from the
owner(s) stating that the owner(s) shall occupy on of the dwelling units on the premises, except for bona fide
ternporary absences, for six months or more of the calendar year. An ADU application shall also be filed as a deed
resfiction with the King Counry department of records and elections to indicate the presence of an ADU, the
requirement of owner occupancy, and other standards for maintaining the unit as described in this Code.
Canceliarion of an ADUs registration may be acwmplished by the owner filing a letter with the department of
community development services for recording at the department of records and elections, or may occur as a result
of an enforcement acrion.
�312. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Chapter 19.140 FWRC.
�-413. ADUs are not permitted on cluster subdivision lots under FWRC 18.55.040(7) or within cottage housing
under Chapter 19.250 FWRC.
d3 14. For provisions that relate to the keeping of anirrals, see Chapter 19.260 FWRC.
Process l, II, IIl and 1 V are described in For other information about parking and parking areas, see Chapter 19.130 FW RC.
Chapter 19.55 FWRC,
Chapter 19.60 FWRC,
Chapter 19.65 FWRC, For details of what may exceed this height limit, see FWRC 19.110.050 et seq.
Chapter 19.70 FWRC respecdvely. For debils regarding required yards, see FWRC 19.125.160 et seq.
Ordinance No. 10- Page 6 of 8
� - Rev I/10 LU
Section 5. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and
severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of
this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall
not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to any
other persons or circumstances.
Section 6. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized
to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of
scrivener/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any
referencesthereto.
Section 7. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective
date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five (5) days after passage
and publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of
,20 .
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, LINDA KOCHMAR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, CAROL MCNEILLY, CMC
Ordinance No. 10- Page 7 of 8
. • ' : �]����1�T.���7���
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CTI'Y CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTNE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.:
Ordinance No. 10- f'a$Q 8 0, f 8
COUNC[L MEETING DATE: -A4���.-:`.�� �ri� � 2p [TEM #: � �
_ ......._ ____. _...._. -__. ___ _ __..... �� .._..__.
CiT�' OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: Amendments to Federal �i�ay Revised Code (FVVRC) Title 16 "Surface Water Management," Title 18 "Subdivisions,"
and Title 19 "Zoning and Development Code," related to appraisal requirements.
POL[CY QUESTIOIYS: Should the city amend the appraisal requirements by replacing the three current requirements of MAI
appraisal, MAI certified appraiser, and source acceptable to the city with one consistent requirement of state certified real estate
appraiser?; And remove exisring code language alio�yinJ the applicable department director to require a second appraisal if ihe
original appraisal is deemed inaccurate or inappropriate`'
CON[�I[TTEE Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC)
� EGORY:
Consent � Ordinance
❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution
MEETING DaTE: March 1, 2009
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
-_
STAEF REPORT BY: Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner _____ DEPT: Communi Development Services_ ___ __
Exhibits: (1) Pianning Comrnission staff report for the February 17, 2010, public hearing with Exhibits A-F; (2) Draft minutes of the
February 17, 2010, Planning Commission meeting; and (3) Draft adoption ordinance.
Background:
Appraisal Requirements - Several sections of the FWRC require applicants to submit assessed or appraisal values for struchues or iand
that an applicant proposes to improve. Two of the ten code sections contain the requirement for a MAI appraisai, while the remaining
eight sections require an appraisal from a source acceptable to the city. The proposed amendment would remove language requiring MAI
appraisals and appraisals from a source acceptable to the city. Those requirements would be replaced consistentiy throughout applicable
FWRC sections allowing the applicant to choose between an assessed or appraised value, with appraisals conducted by a state certified
real estate appraiser.
Appraisal Qualifying Language - Current regulations allow the applicable department director to require an applicant to provide an
appraisal from a second source acceptabie to the city if the initial appraisal appears inaccurate or inappropriate. Staff has not discovered
an instance when this qualifying requirement has been used. The proposed amendment would remove code language allowing the
depactment director to require a second appraisal.
Options Considered: 1) Adopt the Planning Commission's recommendarion as contained in the Draft Adoption Ordinance (Exhibit 3);
2) Ado�t_the Ptannin�,Commission's_recommendation as modified by the LUTC: or 3) Do not ado�t theproposedQolic�____ ______
PLANN[NG COh[M[SS[ON RECOMMENDAT[Olv Adoption of Option #1.
STAFF RECOMNIENDAT[ON Staff recommends the Council adopt Option #1, adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation as
contained in the Draft Adoption Ordinance
CITY MAi�iAGER APPROVAL: QiIJ. li/� O� �j �� ��1D�EGTOR APPROVAL: G� `�F'�
Committee Council Committee Council
COhti�ilTTEE RECOMMEIYDATIOIY Forward Option #1; adopt the P(anning Commission's recommendation as contained in the Draft
Adoprion Ordinance to the fuil Councit on March 16,,2flT(f; �or first �ding �� �
Dinibuclos, Chair
PROPOSED COUNC[L MOTION(S): , / l./ °"�
1 RE.�D[NG OE ORD[NANCE (3/16/10) "� m to forward the ordinance to a second reading for enactment on the Apri16, 2010,
consent agenda. "
2 1VD RF.AD[NG OF ORDIIVANCE �4/GJl O� "I move approval ojthe LUTC's recommendation to approve the code amendments, which are
contai in the Adoption O "
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED
O DENIED
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACT(ON
�� nIOVED TO SECOND READ(NG (ordinances only�
REVISED - 02/06/2006
K�1?009 Code Artiendrtents'�..4W and r�ppraisal Clarification\LUTC1Appraisal�:lppraisa7 Revised Agenda Bi11.DOC
COUNCIL BILL #
1 reading
Enactment reading
ORD[NANCE #
RESOLUTION #
�31
- i
���.
LITY OF �°"„ ���-�"
Federa� ��
DATE:
To:
F[toM:
SUS.r�C'r:
FILE:
MEETt1vG DATE:
E ������
PQ��_�(�� Zc�
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
February 10, 2010
Chair Merie Pfeifer and Members of City of Federal Way Planning Cocnmission
Greg Fewins, Director of Community Development Services
Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner
Appraisal Requirements within Portions of the "Surface Water Management,"
"Subdivisions." and "Zoning and Development Code"
10-100305-UP
February 17, 2010
A. POLICY QUESTION
Should the city amend and make consistent the appraisal requirements within the foilowing three
titles of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC): Title 16, "Surface Water Management"; Title 18,
"Subdivisions"; and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code"?
B. ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A— Proposed Code Amendment to FWRC Chapter 16.15, "Regulated and Exempt Activities"
Exhibit B— Proposed Code Amendment to FWRC Chapter 18.55, "Design Criteria"
Exhibit C— Proposed Code Amendment to FWRC Chapter 1930, "Nonconformance"
Exhibit D— Proposed code amendment to FWRC Chapter 19.135, "Development Improvements"
Exhibit E— Email notification to stakeholder list of Planning Commission public hearing
Exhibit F— Email notification to stakeholder list of Planning Commission staff report
C. BACKGROUND & AN.�LYSIS
Several sections of the FWRC require applicants to submit assessed or appraisal values for structures
or land that an applicant proposes to improve. Two of the ten code sections that staff proposes to
amend contain the requirement for an MAI appraisal, while the remaining seven sections require an
appraisal from a source acceptable to the city. The purpose of this staff initiated text amendment is to
allow an applicant to choose either an assessed or appraised value, and where appraisal is chosen, to
provide a consistent appraisal requirement that: (1) maintains a professional standard; and (2)
removes unnecessary second appraisal qualifying requirements.
MAI Accreditation
As referenced above, three sections of the FWRC require appraisals to be performed by an MAI
accredited appraiser: MAI is a professional designation assigned by the Appraisal Institute, a private
Appraisal Requirements wiihin the "Surface Water Management;' "Subdivisioas." and "Zoning and Development Code" Fi1e #10-100305-UP
Planning Commission Staff Report Page I of 4
!"�.'?�'� AeR'�!�� ,
t.. � :i � : F..,;
�� r�, 4'� ` � �� 2
_ <<� �
association of real estate appraisers. Post-secondary education, experience, and membership in the
organization are requirements for the MAI designation_
Washington State Requirements
All appraisals conducted in the state must be done by a state licensed appraiser, state certified
residential appraiser, or state certified general appraiser. The following are requirements to recei� an
appraisai license or certification and the types of appraisais that may be conducted with each license
or certification.
Appraiser Training Education Type of Appraisal
Conducted
Licensed Two-year 1) 150-hours real estate One to four residential units
apprenticeship appraisal coursework. having a transaction value less
under licensecL' 2) Pass state licensed real than $2�0,000, and non-
certified appraiser. estate appraiser exam residential property having a
transaction value less than
$250,000
Certified Two-year (1) Associate Degree in any All types of residential
Residenrial apprenticeship field or 21 semester hours of property of one to four units
under certified college coursework; 2) 200- without regard to transaction
appraiser hours real estate appraisal vatue and nonresidential
coursework; and 3) Pass property having a transaetion
certified residenrial real estate value less than $250,000.
ap raisal exam.
Certified General 2S year O Bachelor's dearee in any All types of real property
apprenticeship field or at least 30 semester appraisats with no transaction
under certified hours of coilege course work; values limits.
general appraiser 2) 300-hours of real estate
appraisal course work; and 3)
Pass certified general real
estate exam.
Jurisdictional Comparisons
Staff saxnpled the following four surrounding cities' policies of appraisal requirements.
Ci A raisal Lan ua e Code Citation
"This chapter shall not prevent the following
provided the total value of the improvements, over
No language. Auburn uses the most the lifetime of the nonconforming use, does not
exceed 50 percent of the assessed value of the
Auburn recent tax assessment and does not nonconforming use as established by the most
use appraisals.
current county assessor's tax roll...." ACC 18_�4.060
& ACC 12.64A.020 with regard to public
im rovements
Yes. Des Moines requires an "Market value shall be estab(ished by a real estate
appraisal for park fee-in-lieu appraisal submitted by the applicant." DMMC
calculation and right-of-way (ROW) 17.36.150
Des Moines vacations. No ment�on of who is Vacation of all city ROWs shall require
authorized to conduct the appraisal. compensation at 50% of appraised value may be
No codified threshold provided for determined from the records of the department of
nonconforming or public assessments or by informai or formai appraisal.
improvements. partial exce t from DMMC 12.12.050
Appraisal Requirements within the "Surface Water Management," "Subdivisions." and "Zoning and Devebpment Code" File t� Io-1�305-UP
Planning Commission Staff Report Page 2 of 4
��g������ � -
� . _. 3 �� �
� �:,,
;���, _
Cit A raisal Lan uaae Code Citation
No tanguage; parks fee-in-lieu is The dollar amount of the fee-in-lieu shalt be
Kent based on tax assessments, and determined by 1�0 percent of the avera�e assessed
public improvements are based on vatue per unit area of land within the boundaries of
dollar value. the subdivision. Partial excer t rom KCC 12A4.G�.
Yes. Renton requires an appraisal "The cost of the a(terations shall not exceed an
Renton for certain nonconforming ��ses and aggregate cost of fifty percent of the value of the
deveiopment. No mention of �vho is building or structure, based upon its most recent
authorized to conduct the a raisal. assessment or a raisal." KCC 4-10-050
D. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
The proposed development regulation is exempt from environmental review pursuant to State
Environmental Policy Act Rules 197-11-800{l9), "Procedural Actions," because the proposal relates
solely to governmental procedures containing no substantive standards respecting use or modification
of the environment.
Public notice of the Planning Commission hearing was provided February 13, 2010, pursuant to
procedures within FWRC 19.80.170 and emailed to the department's stakeholders (Exhibit E)
February 10, 2010. The staff report and all attachments were also e-mailed to the stakeholders
(Exhibit F).
E. BASIS FOR PLANNING COMM[SSiON ACTiON
FWRC Title 19, "Zoning and Development," Chapter 19.80, "Process VI Review," establishes a
process and criteria for development regulation amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the
role of the Planning Commission is as follows:
1. To review and evaluate the proposed development reguiation amendments.
2. To determine whether the proposed development regulation amendment meets the
criteria provided by FWRC t9_80.130.
3. To forward a recommendation to City Council regarding adoption of the proposed
development regulation amendment.
F. DECISIO(YAL CRITERIA
FWRC 19.80.130 provides criteria for development regulation amendments. The following section
analyzes the compliance of the proposed amendments with the criteria provided by FWRC 19.80.130_
The city may amend the text of the FWRC only if it finds that:
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan.
Staff Response — The proposed code amendment is consistent with the following land use
chapter policies:
LUP4 — Maximizes e�ciency of the development review process.
LUP6 — Conduct regular reviews of the development regulations to cieterinine how
to improve upon the permit review process.
Appraisal Requirements within fihe "Surface Water Management," "Subdivisions." and "Zoning and Development Code" File #10-1003Ui-UP
Planning Commission Staf�'Report Page 3 of 4
������� � _
���� � �����=
2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or cvelfare.
Staff Response — The proposed amendment bears suhstantial relationship to puhlic welfare c�s
it provides a consistent appraisal reql�ire�nent and rnaintains professional standards for those
tivho conduct such appraisals.
3. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the city.
Staff Response — The proposed amendmerat is in the best interest of the ciry as it reqa�ires
appraisa[s submitted to the city to be prepared b}° state-certified appraisers.
G. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
As shown in Exhibits A, B, C, and D, staff recommends replacing appraisat language in Title 16,
"Surface Water ManagemenY'; Title 18, "Subdivisions"; and Titte t9, "Zoning and Development
Code" with a consistent requirement which includes the removal of MAI certification requirements.
Staff proposes all appraisals required in the above-referenced FWRC titles be conducted by a state
certified appraiser. Such, a requirement will provide consistency and a professional standard
throughout applicable sections of the FWRC. Further, the proposed amendment provides a codified
requirement as a substitute for the ambiguous existing language, "...source acceptable to the city."
Staff also recommends the removal of existing code language aliowing the director (Community
Development Services, Public Works, or Parks) to require a second appraisal if inaccurate or
inappropriate as shown in Exhibits A, B, C, and D. As such an option has not been used in the past
and the proposed code amendment would require state certification (highest level of competency),
staff finds the second appraisal qualifying language unnecessary. Further, directors can require an
appraisai be conected if it is determined to be inaccurate or inappropriate.
H. PLANNINC COMMISSION ACTION
Consistent with the provisions of FWRC 19.80.240, the Planning Commission may take the foilowing
actions regarding the proposed development regulation amendments:
i. Recommend to Ciry Council adoption of the FtiVRC text amendments as proposed;
2. Modify the proposed FWRC text amendments and recommend to City Council
adoption of the FWRC text amendments as modified;
3. Recommend to City Council that the proposed FWRC text amendments not be
adopted; or,
4. Forward the proposed FWRC text amendments to City Council without a
recommendation.
K.\2009 Code Amendmentsl.4DU and Appaisal ClarificationlPlanaing Commission\Appraisal!StafT Aepon and Prop�sed Code I�guage�Appraisal SraffReport.doc
Appraisai Requiremenu within tfie "Surface Water Management; '"Subdivisions." and '`Zoning and Development Code" File #10-10030�-UP
Planning Commission Staff Repoct Page 4 of 4
������� -
��d� � � �� � �
EXHIBIT A
Federal tvay Revisec� Code
Title 16, "Surface Water Management"
16.15.010 Regulated activities.
The following activities are subject to the provisions of this title, ••�'°°° °°°-��*°a'�°'^.�.:
( i j New development.
(a) Single-family residentiat or small site development works;
(b) Projects that add 5,000 square feet or more of ne�v impervious surface;
(c) Projects that propose to construct or modify a drainage pipelditch that is 12 inches or more in
size/depth, or receives surface and stormwater runoff from a drainage pipelditch that is i2 inches or more
in sizeldepth; or
(d) Projects that contain or are adjacent to a floodplain, stream, lake, wetland, closed depression,
or other environmentally sensitive area as defined by FWRC Titles 14 and 1�.
(2) Redevelopment, as defined in this title (and as also defined in FWRC 19.30.120), which meets or
exceeds one of the following thresholds or criteria:
(a) Geation or addition of impervious surfaces having an area of �,OOO square feet or more;
(b) Construction or repiacement of a building footprint or other structure having a surface area of
5,000 square feet or more, or which involves the expansion of a buiiding footprint or other structure by
5,000 square feet of surface area or more;
(c) Repair or replacement of 5,000 square feet or more of an impervious surface, when such
redeveiopment is not part of a routine maintenance activity;
(d) Collection and concentration of surface and stormwater runoff from a drainage area of more
than 5,000 square feet;
(e) Projects which contain or directly discharge to a floodplain, stream, lake, wetland, or closed
depression, groundwater recharge area, or other water quality sensitive area dete�nined by the public
�vorks director, based on a written map, policy, water quality monitoring data or plan in existence or
implemented by the director prior to submission of a redevelopment appiication �vhich is determined to
trigger application of this subsection, or based on information deveioped during review of a particular
redevelopment application;
(#� Projects that involve a change in use, and the changed use has a potential to release a new
pollutant(s) to surface water systems within the city. For the purposes of this subsection, "new
pollutant(s) " means a pollutant that was not discharged at that location immediate(y prior to the change in
use, as well as a pollutant that was discharged in less quantities immediately prior to the change in use;
(g) Redevelopment other than normal maintenance or other than tenant improvements, but
including any increase in gross floor area, in any one consecutive 12-month period which exceeds 50
percent of the assessed or appraised value ��•�'��^'�°•�°� �� �°°*°r` of the structure or improvement being
redeveloped. The appraisal shall be conducted by a state-certified appraiser; or
(h) Redevelopment of property which drains or discharges to a receiving water that has a
documented water quality problem, as determined by the public works director based on a map, plan,
water quality monitoring data or a written policy in existence or impiemented by the director prior to
submission of a redevelopment application determined to trigger application of this subsection, where the
director determines that the redevelopment requires additional specific controls to address the
documented water quality problem.
(Ord. No. 99-352, § 3, I 1-16-99. Code 2001 § 21-6.)
Page I of 1
K:L�009 Code Amadmems�lDli a� .4ppraisal Qar�cation\Planning CommissionlAppaisal�Staff Repon and Roposed Caie LanguagnExhibd A Surface Water Managerturu 16.lS.OtO.doe
������� 1
�.ri�� � �#�_��
EXHIBIT B
Federal Way Revised Co�e
Title 18, "Subdivisions"
18.�5.060 Open space and recreation.
( t) For the purpose of this chapter, open space shall be described in the foilowing categories:
(a) Usable open space. Areas which have appropriate topography, soiis, drainage and size to be
considered for development as active recreation areas.
(b) Conservation open space_ Areas containing speciai natural or physicat amenities or
environmentally sensitive features, the conservation of which would benefit surrounding properties or the
community as a whole. Such areas may include, but are not limited to, stands of large trees, view
corridors or view points, creeks and streams, wetlands and marshes, ponds and lakes or areas of historical
or archaeological importance. Conservation open space and usable open space may be, but are not always,
mutually inclusive.
(c) Buff�er open space. Areas which are primarily intended to provide separation between
properties or between properties and streets. Buffer open space may, but does not always, contain usable
open space or conservation open space.
(d) Severely constrained open space. Areas not included in any of the above categories which,
due to physical characteristics, are impractical or unsafe for development. Such areas may include but are
not limited to steep rock escarpments or areas of unstable soils.
(2) All residential subdivisions, except for cottage housing, and zero lot line townhouse development,
shall be required to provide open space in the amount of 15 percent of the gross land area of the
subdivision site. Open space requirexnents for zero lot line townhouse development are found in FWRC
(9.205.010 and open space requirements for cottage housing are found in FWRC 19.250.070 and
19.250.080. Except for subdivisions created under FWRC 18.5�.040, and small lot detached development
created under FWRC 18.25.030, a fee-in-lieu payment may be made to satisfy open space requirements at
the discretion ofthe parks director after consideration oFthe city's overa(l park plan, quality, location, and
service area of the open space that would othenvise be provided within the project. If the city determines
that the iocation, quality, or extent of the required project open space, particularly on smaller plats, short
plats, or other divisions of land, would not fulfill the intent or purpose of useful common open space, a
payment of an equivalent fee-in-lieu of the required project open space shall be paid.
The fee-in-lieu of open space shall be calculated on i � percent of the most recent assessed value of
the property. In the absence of an assessment, the market value shall be based on an appraisal conducted
by a state-
certified real estate appraiser. If the applicant offers to pay money in lieu of open space, and if the city
accepts the offer, the amount shall be determined based upon the square footage of open space which
oYherwise would have been required to be provided, times the then current market value per square foot of
similarly situated property. For lots within an existing subdivision, where open space was already
dedicated or a fee-in-lieu paid, the percent of open space required will be the difference between the open
space dedicated prior and 15 percent. Any fees collected sha(1 be utilized within the park comprehensive
pian planning area that the subject property falls within, untess the applicant by voluntary agreement
directs the expenditures of such fees in a different planning area. Open space created through small lot
detached development shall be protected from further subdivision or development by covenants filed and
recorded with the final plat of the subdivision. All usable open space must be readily identifiable with the
development and easily accessible by the residents. Usable open space should be the central focus and an
amenity for the project.
Page I of 2
K:�3009 Code ArmndmentsWDU and Appaisal Clarification�Planning Commission\Appraisal'�Staff Report and Pn�puscd Code Language\Exhibit B Subdivisbns 18.55.060.doc
������`�" t
������� Z�
(3) Any combination of open space types may be used to accomplish the total area required to be
reserved as follows:
Open Space Category "/o of Gross Land area
Usable l0% minimuin
Conservation No maximum or minimu
Buffer 2% maximum
Constrained 2% maximum
An administrarive alteration of the open space cateDory percentage requirements within the above
categories may be made by the parks director on a case-by-case basis, but in no case shall the
combination of categories total less than 15 percent unless other�vise provided for in FWRC 18.45.010.
Review and approval of such cases shall be based on the following considerations:
(a) The change in percentage requirements would result in a superior open space plan than could
be accomplished under the standard percentage requirements.
(b) The availability and types of open space located �vithin the immediate area.
(c) The presence on site of environmental features that are unique, rare or of local importance.
(d) The opporlunities for the preservation of significant views and creation of public access points
of interest.
(e) T'he relationship of the proposed open space to the city's park p(an.
(4) Open space which is part of an adopted parks, recreation, trails or open space plan may be
dedicated to the city for such purposes.
(5 ) Open space not part of an adopted parks, recreation, trails or open space plan shall be owned in
common undivided interest by all property owners within the land division as members of a homeowners'
association or eorporation as set out in a declaration of covenants and restrictions, and approved by the
city.
(6) Subject to approval by the city, ownership in open space may be transferred to a special interest
group or organization which shall assume the responsibitity o£ maintaining the open space for its intended
purpose.
(Ord. No. 07-554, § 5(Exh. A(2)), 5-15-07; Ord. No. 98-330, � 3, 12-1�-98; Ord. No. 98-309, § 3, 1-6-98; Ord. No_
97-?9l, � 3, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 90-41, § 1(16.250.10 — 16.250.60), 2-27-90. Formerly 20-15�. Code 2001 § 20-156.)
Page 2 of 2
K.i009 Code Amendments'�ADU and Appraesal Clarificationlplanning Commission\AppraisallStaff Repon and Preryosed Codz Language�Exhibit B Subdivisions 18.55.060.doe
EXHIBIT C
Federal Way Revised Code
Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code"
����,��� �
��`����� g �i�'�
19.30.080 Nonconforming use.
(1) Any nonconforming use must be terminated if:
(a) The applicant is making structural alterations or increasing the gross floor area of any
structure that houses or supports the nonconforming use;
(b) Other than as specified in subsection (1)(a) of this section, the applicant is making changes or
alterations or doing work, other than normai maintenance, in any one consecutive 12-month period to any
structure that houses or supports the nonconforming use and the fair market value of that change,
alteration or work exceeds 15 percent of the assessed or appraised value of that structure. ��e-a�i�
.:a° � �' ���'�° �*•-"��,�° �� *'�° °,.'-:°�* -� ^°�� The appraisal must be from a se�se
*'�^+ � °�*^"'° *^''�° ^�'�• state-certified real estate appraiser. T'�° �:'-. a°�.°'��-~°~' a:~°^*^�
. �
;
(c) The subject properiy has been abandoned.
(2) Subsections (1)(a) and (b) of this section do not apply to expansions or alterations to a structure
that houses or supports a nonconforming use when the purpose is to establish, expand, or alter a
conforming use.
(Ord. No. 06-� 1�, § 3, 2-7-06; Ord. No. 04-468, § 3, I 1-16-04; Ord. No. 97-307, § 3, 12-16-97; Ord. No. 92-144,
§ 3{165.3�(2)), 6-16-92; Ord. No. 92-135, § 3(165_35(2)), 4-21-92; Ord. No. 91-1 i3, § 4(165.35(2)), 12-3-91; Ord.
No. 90-43, y� 2(1653�(2)), 2-27-90. Code 2001 § 22-332.)
1930.090 Nonconforming development.
(1) If any aspect, structure, improvement or development does not confonn to the development
regulations prescribed in this title, that aspect, shucture, improvement or development must be brought
into conformance or otherwise improved as set forth below.
(a) Change of use — Single-tenant site. If any applicant proposes a change of use on property used
or occupied by a single tenant or use, the applicant shail meet those provisions determined by the director
to be reasonably related and applicable to the change of use. These provisions shall apply to the entire
site.
(b) Change of use — Multi-tenant site. If an applicant proposes a change oF use on only a portion
of property oceupied by cnultiple tenants or uses, the applicant shall meet those provisions determined by
the director to be reasonably related and applicable to the change of use. These provisions shall apply
only to that geographic portion of the site related to the use or tenant space on which the change is
proposed.
{c) Increase in gross floor area. If an applicant proposes to increase the gross floor area of any
use on the subject property in any one of the following ways, the applicant shall comply with the
development regulations in effect at the time of the proposal, as specified below:
(i) If expansion of gross•#loor area of an existing buitding occurs either through addition of
new floors within the structure or enlargement of the existing building footprint, the applicant shall
comply with all development regularions in effect at the time the expansion is proposed. If the property on
which the expansion is proposed is occupied by multiple tenants or uses, the applicant shall comply with
those development regulations applicable to the geographic portion of the site on which the expansion is
proposed; or
Page i of ! 0
K:1.009 Code Amerufinen�s'��ADU and Appraisal Clarificazion�Plalming CommissionWppraisai�Staff Repa� and Proposed Code Language`.Exhibit C Chapter 1930 Nonconformace.doe
��p`���+.ti�� �
���Ns ,��! �
(ii) [f a ne�v and separate structure is being constructed on an already developed site, the
applicant shall comp(y �vith all devetopment regulations applicable to the geographic portion of the site
on which the new structure and any related improvements are to be constructed; or
(iii) If the increase in gross tloor area involves an existing single-family residential dwelling,
the applicant shall comply ��-ith the development regulations in effect at the time of the proposal. For
single-family residences, existing nonconformities may remain and continue so long as the existing
nonconformities are not being increased or expanded in any way. Ne�v construction or renovarion which
involves the increase in aros� floor area of a nonconforming single-family structure is subject to all
applicable requirements of this Code including bu# not limited to provisions related to critical areas
(FWRC Title 19, Division �'), off-street parking (Chapter 19.130 FWRC), improvements (Chapter 19.135
FWRC), and landscaping (Chapter 19.125 FWRC).
(iv) If the increase in gross floor area involves an existing single-story building in the city
center that is nonconforming as to the ground floor size limits established in Chapter 19.225 FWRC, the
existing building footprint shall not be enlarged, except the director may approve minor additions such as
entry structures, lobbies, seating or dining areas, bay windows, and similar features; provided, that such
addition(s) shail not exceed i square feet per building in any one consecutive 12-month period, and
shatl not increase the e;ctent of any other nonconformance.
(d) Abandonnierit. If an applicant proposes any work, including tenant improvements, on property
that has been abandoned, the applicant shall comply with all development regulations applicable to the
subject property, to the extent physically or technically practicable on the site.
(e) The use conducted on the subject property has ceased for more than one year, in which case
the applicant shall repair and/'or restore the improvements on the site (e.g., drainage, landscaping, curbing,
parking, parking lot landscaping, etc.) to a condition as near as physically possible to the condition
required by the requirements of approval of the existing development.
(� The applicant is making any alteration or changes or doing any �vork, other than normal
maintenance, tenant improvements, or minor additions noted in subsection (1)(c)(iv) of this section, in
any one consecutive 12-month period to an improvement that is nonconforming and the fair market value
of the alteration, change or other �vork exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value of that
improvement. . The appraisal must be from a
state-certified real estate appraiser. T�° a:�°�'�� m ° °+'�° �~':�°~+ *�
. ,
*'�°'�--�-°~ �� •"° +,•,� °m�"�+� �"°" �° „ �°a In the event this subsection is triggered with respect to a
single-tenant or single-occupant site, the applicant shall meet all development regulations applicable to
the property. In the event this subsection is triggered with respect to a site occupied by multiple tenants or
uses, the applicant shall comply with those development regulations applicable to the geographic portion
of the site on which the alteration, change or improvement is proposed. For purposes of �s-determining
value under this section, improvements required pursuant to this section (nonconforming development),
FWRC 19.30.110 (when public improvements must be installed), 19.30.120 (nonconforming water
quality improvements) and 19.135.030 (when public improvements must be installed) shall not be
counted towards the 50 percent threshold which would trigger application of this subsection.
(2) This section does not govern application of Chapter 19.115 FWRC, Community Design
Guidelines; application of Chapter 19.115 FWRC is governed by FWRC 19.115.010 through 19.115.100,
as amended. This section also does not govern applicarion of development regulations relating to water
quality, signs, or street/sidewalk improvements; application of those development regulations is governed
by FWRC 19.30.100, 19.30.110, 19.30.120 and 19.135.020, all as amended.
(Ord. No. 06-515, ` 3, 2-07-06; Ord. No. 04-468, � 3, i 1-16-04; Ord. No. 02-�320, � 3, 7-2-02; Ord. No. 97-307, § 3,
12-16-97; Ord. No. 92-144, � 3(i653�(4)), 6-16-92; Ord. No. 92-13�, § 3(165.35(4)), 4-21-92; Ord. No. 91-113,
§ 4(16�.35(4)), 12-3-91; Ord. No. 90-�3, § 2(16�.35(4)), 2-27-90. Code 2001 § 22-334.)
Page2of10
K:�2009 Code Amendmeats'�ADU a� appiarsal ClarificatiomPlanning CommissionWppraisal'Statt' Repon and Proposed Code Language\E�chibit C Chaper 19 t0 Nonconforrmce.dac
��������-
19.30.100 Nonconforming signs.
���p�� � � ��s.�
{1) Patrpose. In order to ease the economic impact of this Code on businesspersons �vith substantial
investment in signs in existence on the date of adoption of this Code, or on the date of annexation if
located in areas annexed to the city thereatter, this seetion provides for up to 10 years of continued use of
a nonconforming sign in its existing state. During this period, it is expected that the sign may be
amortized in its value over this 10-year time period andlor may be amortized for federal income tax
purposes; provided, however, that whether a sign is amortized for tax purposes shall not affect the
appiication of this section.
(2) Definitions. A"nonconforming srgn" means any sign as defined by FWRC 19_05.t90 which was
legally in existence on the effective date of this Code, February 28, 1990, or on the date of annexation if
located in areas annexed to the city thereafter, but which does not comply with the sign regulations of
Chapter 19.140 FWRC, Signs, or any other sections of this Code. Any words, terms or phrases used in
this section and which are not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in Chapter 19.05
FWRC.
(3) Legal nonconformance.
(a) Eligibility. Any nonconforming sign located within the city limits on the date of adoption of
this Code, February 28, 1990, or on the date of annexation if located in areas annexed to the city
thereafter which dces not conform with the provisions of this Code, is eligible for characterization as a
legal nonconforming sign provided it meets the following requirements:
(i) The sign was covered by a sign permit on the date of adoption of this Code, if one was
required under applicable law; or
(ii) If no sign permit was required under applicable law for the sign, the sign was in all
respects in compliance with applicable lativ on the date of adoption of this Code.
(b) Allowed. All legai nonconforming signs are allowed subject to all permit requirements, the
provisions covering loss of legal nonconforming status and other limitations set forth in this section.
(c) Ezclu.rions. Except for billboards, off-site signs, and roof signs, prohibited signs as defined in
FWRC 19.t40.130 shall not be eligible for characterization as legal nonconforming signs and must be
removed upon notification by the city.
(4) Notice of determination.
(a) Required. After the city conducts a sign inventory, the city shall analyze whether each sign
compiies with the sign reguiations of Chapter 19. i40 FWRC, Signs, or any other sections of this Code,
and shalt issue a notice of determination which specifies whether the sign complies or not. If a sign
conforms to this title, it shail be issued a registration sticker. If a sign is determined to be legally
nonconforming, the sign will be issued a sign inventory sticker and shali be amortized pursuant to
subsection (5) of this section. Signs that do not comply with the sign regulations of Chapter 19.140
FWRC, Signs, or any other sections of this Code or are not eligible for characterization as lega(
nonconforming signs must be removed upon notification by the city.
(b) Necessary information. The information associated with a sign and its sign inventory number
shall consist of the name and address of the sign user, the sign owner, and the owner of the property upon
which the sign is located, information about the sign, such as sign type, area, height, dimensions, location,
a photo of the sign, and such other pertinent information as the director may require to ensure compliance
with the Code, which may include proof of the date of installation of the sign.
(5) Amortization. All iegal nonconforming signs shall be discontinued and removed or made
conforming within 10 years from the effective date of this Code, on or before February 28, 2000, or
within 10 years of the effective date of annexation if located in areas annexed to the city thereafter. Upon
the expiration of the amortization period, the sign shall be brought into conformance with this Code, with
a permit obtained, or be removed. A sign prohibited pursuant to FWRC 19.140.130 may not be brought
into conformance and must therefore be immediately removed upon the expiration of the amortization
period.
(6) Extension or ezemption from amortization period.
(a) Applicability. This subsection applies to any sign which is required to be removed pursuant to
subsection (5) of this section following expiration of the amortization period.
Page 3 of 10
K\2009 Code AmendmentsUDU and Appraisal Clarifxation\Planoing CommissionlAppraisal�Staff Repon and Proposed Code Language�Exhibit C Chapter i9 l0 Nrn�coniwnace.doc
G������
� �>�'°�� ��,.�Y` �
s :,._ �
(b) Purpose. A sign amortization exemption or extension is a mechanism by which the city may
provide relief fiom the effect of the sign amortization program u�hen its enforcement wou(d fail to
noticeably in�prove the appearance of the neighborhood and the city and when a hardship would result
from its enforcement.
(c) Who may apply. The property o�vner or the person displaying the sign which is required to be
removed pursuant to subsection (�) of this section may apply for a sign amortization extension or
exemption.
(d) Decisional criteria. An application for a sign amortization exemption or extension may be
approved or approved with rnodification if it satisfies ali of the following criteria:
(i) The sign is compatible tivith the architectural design of structures on the subject property;
(ii) The sign substantially compiies with the requirements of the sign code for the land use
district in which it is located. For purposes of this subsection, "substantial compliance " means that the
height of the sign is within 10 percent of the sign height required by Chapter 19.140 FWRC and that the
sign area of the sign is within 20 percent of the sign area required by Chapter 19.140 FWRC. Minor
deviations from these percentages may be approved by the administrator if he or she concludes that the
resulting sign is harmonious with the character of the primary structures on the subject property and with
the signs and structures on surrounding properties;
(iii) The enforcement of this Code would result in a substantial hardship to the applicant due
to the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property and such hardship was not
created by any action of the applicant;
(iv) The sign complies �vith the city's minimum sign distance at intersection requirements
pursuant to FWRC 19.135.300 et seq.;
(v) If illuminated, the sign is oriented away from residentially developed or zoned property or
is adequately screened so that the source of light is not directly visible;
(vi) It is consistent with the city�'s comprehensive plan; and
(vii) It is consistent with the pub(ic health, safety and welfare.
(e) Applicable procedt�re. Except as other�vise provided by this subsecrion (6), the city will
process an application for a sign amortization exemption or extension through process I of this Code.
(7) Loss of legal nonconforming sign status_ All legal nonconforming signs shall be immediately
removed or modified to conform to all the provisions of this title, and a new permit secured therefor, and
such iegal nonconforming sign shall immediate[y lose its legal nonconforming designation when one or
more of the following events occurs:
(a) Structural changes. The applicant is making structural alterations or increasing the gross floor
area of any structure that houses or supports the use with which the legal nonconforming sign is
associated.
(b) Other alterations. The applicant is making any change, altera.tion or performing work other
than normal maintenance or other than tenant improvements, in any 12-month period, to any structure that
houses or supports the use with which the legal nonconforming sign is associated and the fair market
value of those changes, alterations or other work exceeds 25 percent of the assessed value of that structure
as determined by the King County assessor.
(c) Abandonment or business cessation. T'he subject property containing the sign is abandoned for
90 or more consecutive days or the activity conducted on the subject property ceases for i80 consecutive
days.
(d) Sign alterations. The applicant is making changes, alterations or performing any work to the
legal nonconforming sign other than regular and normal maintenance. Prohibited sign alterations include
relocating the sign or replacing the sign; provided, however, that replacing any individual tenant's �
identificarion sign in either a center identification sign which separately identifies the tenants or in a
tenant directory sign shatl not result in the loss of such sign's legat nonconforming sign designation_
(e) Change in use. There has been a change in use on the subject property as that term is defined
by FWRC 19.05.030.
( fl Change in tenant. There has been a change in tenant or business on the subject property.
Page 4 of 10
K�2009 Code Amendmenis',ADIi and Appreisal ClarificationiPlanning Corranission'.Appraisal`:Stat7 Report and Proposed Code Lznguage\Exhibit C CAaptc 1930 Nonconformate.doc
�������
��,��� t2 �� 2c.
i..
In connection with any multi-use or multi-tenant complex, the foregoing events �vhich require
that a legal nonconforming sign be either removed or brought into contormance with this Code shall
appty only to the individual owner's or tenant's bui(din�-mounted or freestanding signs who has triggered
the elimination of the legal nonconformance and not to the other signs located on the subject property,
including any copy change in a center identification or tenant directory sign in order to include such
tenant's name.
(g) Expiration of amortization period. Ail lega( nonconforming signs shall be discontinued and
removed ar made conforming within 10 years from the effective date of this Code, on or before February
28, 2000, or within 10 years of the effective date of annexation if located in areas annexed to the city
thereafter.
(8) Historic signs. Nonconforming on-site historical signs may be retained through process N of this
Code, if the sign is determined to be of historic significance by satisfying ali of the following criteria:
(a) The sign is used in connection with a building which has been designated as a historic
building pursuant to any federal, state or local preservation authority;
(b) The subject sign or signs are substantially unchanged or unaltered since initial installation;
(c) The subject sign or signs are a good example of the prevailing signage during the period in
time it was installed; and
(d) The subject sign or signs have been well maintained and are not materially detrimental to the
public health, safety and welfare.
(9) Government acquisition of property for right-of-lvuy.
(a) A sign that becomes nonconforming with respect to its setback from the edge of a public
right-of-way as a result of a local, state, or federal government acquisition of property for right-of-way
expansion shall be characterized as a legal nonconforming sign and shall be allowed subject to the
requirements of subsection (9)(c) of this section.
(b) The city may, using process I, allow the placement of a new sign or relocation of an existing
sign within a required setback if it meets all of the following criteria:
(i) The enforcement of this Code wou(d resuit in substantial hardship to the applicant because
no feasibie location exists to place a sign on the subject property other than in a required setback, and
such hardship was created solely by local, state, or federal government acquisition of property for right-
of-way expansion and not by any action of the applicant;
(ii) The sign is not prohibited by FWRC 19.140.130 and, except for location within a required
setback, complies with all other requirements of Chapter 19.140 FWRC;
{iii) The sign complies with the city's minimu�n sight distance at intersection requirements
pursuant to FWRC 19.135.300 et seq.; and
(iv) Location of the sign with a required setback is otherwise consistent with the public
health, safety, and welfare.
(c) Loss of legal nonconforming sign status. Al! nonconforming signs specified in subsections
(9)(a) and (b) of this section shall be immediately removed or modified to conform to ali the provisions of
this title, and a new permit secured therefor, and such nonconforming sign shall immediately lose its legal
nonconforming designation when one or more of the following events occurs:
(i) The applicant is making any changes, alterations, or performs any work to the legal
nonconforming sign other than regular and normal maintenance. Prohibited sign alterations include
relocating the sign or replacing the sign; provided, however, that any copy change in a center
identificarion or tenant directory sign shall not result in the loss of such sign's legat nonconforming sign
designation; except that a legal nonconforming sign may be relocated without losing its legal
nonconforming status and eligibility for the 10-year amortization period so long as all of the following
conditions are met: (A) the sign is under threat of eminent domain and the subject of a consent decree or
settlement agreement executed with a local, state, or federal government; (B) the consent decree or
settlement agreement was executed and fi(ed with the court or recorded prior to the effective date of
annexation; (C) the consent decree or settlement agreement does not compensate the owner of the sign for
bringing the sign into conformance with the provisions of this title; (D) the owner of the sign applies for a
Page � of 10
K:4'009 Code Amendme�uWDU and Appraisal Clarification\Pianning CommissanWppraisaP�.Staf( Repun and Proposed Code LanguagelExh��bit C Chapta 1930 NonconCortoxe.doe
�������' 1
'- "°���,..���_2to
permit to reiocate the sign within six months of the date the consent decree or settlement agreement was
filed; and (E) the owner makes no changes to the sign that increase the nonconEormance of the sign; or
(ii j The applicant is making any changes, alterations, or performs work other than normal maintenance or
other fhan tenant improvements to any structure or improvement that houses or supports the use with
�vhich the nonconforming sign is associated, and the fair market value of those changes, alterations, or
other work, in any one consecutive 12-month period, exceeds 7� percent of the assessed or �praised
•� L • iR iii `� cour�c`" ir.i52$�r0f�3
value of that structure or improvement��eE��-Qy- e-I � �
-;a° ° �' �r*'�° °*- � ^*. The appraisal must be from a � ° *'�°+ �
state-certified real estate appraiser. '''"° a;�°�+�~ -~ ° ° *'�° ^~~';^��* �°
. ,
*'�°'^rR°r ��*'�°'�•.^ °-�^,.�*� ^'�^"'�° ..^°a. For purposes of determining value under this subsection,
improvements required pursuant to FWRC 19.30.090 (nonconforming development) andJor 19.30.110
(street; sidewalk improvements) shall not be counted towards the 75 percent threshold, which would
trigger application of this subsection.
(d) Exemption. The city may elect not to apply any provision of this section if the removal of a
sign w•ould require the city to pay compensation under any federal, state or other law, including Chapter
47.42 RCW.
(Ord. N o. 09-�9�, § 9, 1-6-09; Ord. Na 05-486, § 3, 4-19-05; Ord. No. 04-468, § 3, 11-i6-04; Ord. No. 01-398, § 1,
7-17-01; Ord. No. 99-357, § 4, 12-7-99; Ord. No. 97-307, § 3, 12-t6-97; Ord. No. 9�-23�, § 3, 6-6-95; Ord. No. 92-
t44, � 3(16�.3�(5)), 6-16-92; Ord. No. 92-135, § 3(16535(�}), 4-21-92; Ord No. 91-113, § 4(16�.35(5)), 12-3-91;
Ord. No. 90-4.i, § 2(1653�(5)), 2-27-90. Code 2001 § 22-335.)
19.30.120 Nonconforming water quality improvements.
This section sets forth the standards when and under what circumstances a structure, improvement,
de�•elopment, or property that does not conform to the development regulations in FWRC TiYle 16
relating to ���ater quality must be brought into compliance with the development regulations in FWRC
Title 16 pertaining to water quality.
(1) Redevelopment. Any person proposing to redevelop a structure, improvement, development or
property must bring that structure, improvement, development or property into compliance with the
de� reguiations in FWRC Title 16 pertaining to water quality, where the proposed
redevelopment meets or exceeds the thresholds set forth below. For the purposes of this section,
"redevelop" or "redevelopment" means, on an already developed site: the creation or addition of
impervious surface; the expansion of a building footprint or addition or replacement of a structure;
structural development including an increase in gross floor area andlor exterior construction or
remodeling, where the shuctural deveiopment exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value of
the structure or icnprovement being redeveloped; the repair or replacement of impervious surface that is
not part of a routine maintenance act�vity; a change of use which has a potential to release a new
po(iutant(s) to the city's surface water systecns; or iand disturbing activities associated with impervious
redevelopment. The appraisal must be from a state certified real estate appraiser.
(a) Redevelopment which involves the creation or addition of impervious surfaces having an area
of 5,000 square feet or more;
(b) Redevelopment which involves the construction or replacement of a building footprint or
other structure having a surface area of 5,000 square feet or more, or which involves the expan5ion of a
building footprint or other shucture by 5,000 square feet of surface area or more;
(c) Redevelopment which involves the repair or replacement of �,000 square feet or more of an
impervious surface, when such redeveiopment is not part of a routine maintenance activity;
(d) Redevelopment which invoives the collection and/or concentration of surface and/or
stormwater runoff from a drainage area of 5,000 square feet. or more;
(e) Redevelopment which contains or directly discharges to a floodplain, stream, lake, wetland, or
closed depression, groundwater recharge area, or other water quality sensitive area determined by the
pub(ic works director, based on a written map, policy, water quaiity monitoring data or plan in existence
Page 6 of l0
K"_Cr W C�de .�mendments`�:1DU and Appraisal C1ariFication�Planning Commission�Appraisal�$tati Repat and Proposed Code Language�Erhibn C Chapter 1930 Nonconforrtmee.doe
� � � � � ��._._l�r��
� � ��
���N _ ��.��-co
or implemented by the public �vorks director prior to submission of a rede��elopment apptication which is
determined to trig�er application of this subsection, or based on intormation developed during review of a
particular rede�elopment application;
(� Redevelopment which invo(ves a change in use, and the chan��ed use has a potential to release
a new pollutant(s) to surface �vater systems within the city. For the purposes of this subsection, "new
pollutant(sj " means a pollutant that was not discharged at that location immediately prior to the change in
use, as well as a pollutant that was discharged in less quantities immediateiy prior to the change in use;
(g) Redevelopment, other than norn�al maintenance or other than the tenant improvements, but
inciuding any increase in gross floor area, in any one consecutive 12-month period which exceeds 50
percent of the assessed or appraised value (whichever is greater) of the structure or improvement being
redeveloped. T"° ��':�°^* -� , :a° � �' ��+'�° ; °^*. The appraisal must be from a
state-certified general appraiser. �''�° �..'�':� .�-'.° a;�°^�^� m ° °t"°
° �°a'�•. �"° �;*�, *'�° ^- �''*'�° ��,^ ° �+� °"^" "° . �°a. For purposes of determining value
under this section, improvements required pursuant to FWRC 19.30.090 (nonconfocming development),
FWRC 19.30.110 (streedsidewalk improvements), this section (nonconforming water quality
improvements) and FWRC 19.135.030 (streedsidewalk improvements) sha(1 not be counted towards the
50 percent threshold which would trigger application of this subsection;
{h) Redevelopment of properly which drains or discharges to a receiving water that has a
documented water quality problem, as determined by the public works director based on a map, plan,
water quality monitoring data or a written policy in existence or implemented by the public works director
prior to submission of a redevelopment application determined to trigger application of this subsection,
where the public works director determines that the redevelopment requires additional specific controls to
address the documented water quality problem.
(2) Timing. All improvements required by this section shall be constructed or insta(led concurrent
with the redevelopment triggering application of this section, unless an applicant for redevelopment opts
to pursue incremental construction of required improvements. In that event, the applicant shall develop
and submit to the public works director a stormwater management plan detailing all of the improvements
required by this section, and proceed according to the following subsections.
(a) Extent of construction of required water quality improvements. Where the pubtic works
director determines that incremental construction is physically feasible, the applicant shall construct that
portion of the required improvements according to the following schedule:
% of Redevelopment % of Water Quality Improvements
0-24 25
25 — 49 50
>SO 100
Where construction of 100 percent of water quality improvements is required under Yhis subsection,
the icnprovements may be constructed over a period extending no more than five years from the date of
approval of the redevelopment. A person choosing to utilize such extended construction shall provide, prior
to approval of the stormwater management plan, a performance bond and bond agreement that:
(i) Have a term equal to the construction schedule proposed in the plan; and
(ii) Comply with the applicable requirements of Chapter 19.25 FWRC, as amended.
(b) Incremental construction not feasible. Where the public works director determines that
incrementai construction is not physically feasible, 100 percent of the required water quality improvements
must be installed, concurrent with the redevelopment.
(c) Culculation of redevelopment vadue. For purposes of calculating the value of redevelopment in
order to apply subsection (2)(a) of this section, the public works director shall consider the cost of the
proposed redevelopment as a percentage of the assessed or appraised value ��•����'�°•�°-- �� �-• of all
Page 7 of 10
K:1.�009 Code Amendmrnts'-..aDU and Appraisal Clarification\P�anning CommissionVlppraisallStafiReport aM1 ProposeA Code language'�F.rhiLit C Chapter 19 30 Vonconfomaee.doe
G��� � ��
R��� ��S ��'_�?�o
structures on the subject property. ,�
°�*��'° *� *'�° �;*.. �a ��;a � � ���' �. *'�° � �':^�^+ The appraisal must be from a state
certified real estate appraiser.
(d) Subsequent redeveloprnent. Whenever any person seeks approval for redevelopment on
property for �vhich incremental construction of required water quality improvements �vas previously
authorized pursuant to this subsection (2), any additional water quality improvements to be required shali
be determined by application of the schedule in subsection (2)(a) of this section based on the stormwater
management plan prepared as part of the first request for authorization of incremental construction. If
water quaiity requirements have changed since preparation of the initial stormwater management plan, a
new plan shall be prepared detailing improvements required to comply with any existing and new
requirements, and the schedule in subsection (2)(a) of this section shall also be applied to the new plan.
(3) Location of water quality improvemenls. A person proposing redevelopment on a property or site
having a Federal Way comprehensive plan designation of CC-F (City Core — Frame) or CC-C (City Core
— Center) may construct water quality facilities required by this section below grade.
(Ord. No. 09-�95, § 8, L-6-09; Ord. No. 04-468, � 3, 11-16-04; Ord. No. 97-307, § 3, 12-i6-97; Ord. No. 92-144,
§ 3(165.35), 6-16-92; Ord. No. 92-13�, � 3(165.35), 4-21-92; Ord. No. 91-t 13, § 4(1653�), i2-3-91; Ord. No. 90-
43, § 2(t6535), 2-27-90. Code 2001 § 22-337.)
19.30.130 Special provisions for residential uses.
If the subject property contains a residential use that became nonconforming as to use or density as a
result of the adoption of this title, the following regulations apply:
(1) If the improvements on the subject property are damaged or destroyed by any sudden cause,
the structure may be rebuilt; provided, that the number of dwelling units and the gross floor area in and on
the subject property may not be increased from that which existed immediately prior to the damage or
destruction and any other nonconformity of or on the subject property may not in any way be increased.
The provisions of this subsection are oniy available if the applicant applies for a building permit within 12
months after the sudden damage or destruction and conshuction is commenced and completed under that
building permit.
(2) Other than as specified in subsection (1) of this section, the nonconforming use or density
must be corrected if the appiicant is making changes, alterations or doing other work, other than normal
maintenance, in any 12-month period to any structure on the subject property containing multi-unit
housing (attached and/or stacked dwelling units) and fair market vaiue of these changes, alterations or
other work exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value of that multi-unit structure. �e
�':���* -� .:a° � �' �'�+'�° ; ° °�*. The appraisal must be from a �'����
°�*�'�'° ��'"° ��'�� state-certified real estate appraiser. "'""° � ��'�� a°�•°'^�m°�* �':�°^*^� ^�
. ,
,.c«�,e .,.,,. ,,,.,,�.,..«� ��,,.0 �.o „�o,+ Changes, alterations, additions or other work is subject to all applicable
requirements of this Code including but not limited to provisions related to critical areas (FWRC Title 19,
Division V), off-street parking (Chapter 19.i30 FWRC), improvements (Chapter 19.135 FWRC), and
landscaping (Chapter 19.125 FWRC).
(3) Other than as specified in subsection (1) of this section, the nonconforming use or density must be
corrected if the applicant is making changes, alterations, adding improvements or doing other work other
than normal maintenance, in any 36-month period, on the subject property containing a single-family use
and fair market value of these changes, alterations, addirions or other work exceeds 75 percent of the
assessed or appraised vaiue of that single-family structure. Changes, alterations, additions or other work
must comply with all bulk, dimensional and other development requirements for a single-family detached
dwelling located in the RS 7.2 zone (FWRC 19.200.010). �''�° ��':���+ -� .:a° � �' ��*"°
Page 8 of 10
R:12009 Code Amendments�A W and Appraisal Claritication`�.%anning Commission\Appraisal�Staff Report and P�oposed Code LanguageSExhibit C Chapter 19.30 Nonconfo�mace doc
������'�' �
���� �� �� �
� ��a �-•. *�� �:*" *�� ������- �� *�� *�•.^ ^*� ��^j� �� , c��- The a�praisal must be from a state
J
certified real estate a�praiser. Changes, alterations, additions or other work is subject to all applicable
requirements of this Code includin� but not limited to provisions related to critical areas (FWRC Title 19,
Division V), off-street parking (Chapter 19.130 FWRC), improvements (Chapter 19.13� FWRC), and
landscaping (Chapter 19.12� FWRC).
(Ord. No. 04-�368, y 3, 11-tG-0�1; Ord. No. 02-�i19, � 3, 7-2-02; Ord. No. 97-307, § 3, 12-16-97; Ord. No. 92-144,
� 3{16�.45), G-16-92; Ord. No. 92-13�, � 3(16�.4�), 4-21-92; Ord. No. 91-113, § 4(165.45), 12-3-9L; Ord. No. 90-
43, § 2(16�.4�), 2-27-90. Formerly 22-339. Code 2001 § 22-338.)
19.30.160 Special provisions for compliance with government regutations.
The provisions of this section wiil be follo�ved regardless of any conflicting regulations of this chapter.
Any regulations of this chapter which do not conflict with the provisions of this section are unaffected by
this section.
(1) Oil tanks. Any excavation, development activity or construction performed to comply with the
"Underground StoraDe Tanks; Technical Requirements and State Program Approvai; Final Rutes" (40
CFR 280 and 281), as now existing or as hereafter amended or with the provisions of Chapter 90.76
RCW, or any regulations adopted thereunder, may not be used as the basis, or part of the basis, for
requiring that nonconformance on the subject property be corrected.
(2) Governmental acc�uisition of property for right-of-way expansion. A proposal for structural
alterations or change in use shall not trigger a requirement otherwise applicable under FWRC 19.30.090
that an applicant correct an existing nonconformance as to lot coverage, minimum tot size, parking,
landscaping, or setback requirements, if the nonconformance was created solely by a local, state, or
federal government acquisition of property for right-of-way expansion, and if the proposal meets the
following requirements:
(a) The nonconformity is not, in any way, eniarged, expanded, increased, intensified,
compounded, or in any other way made greater;
(b) The applicant is making any alterations or changes or doing any work, other than tenant
improvements and the fair market value of the alteration, change or other work, in any one consecutive
12-month period, does not exceed 75 percent of the assessed or appraised value of the improvement. �e
^'�^�^* m ���'° � �' �+ *"° � °��°. The appraisal must be from a � ��
^°-��^'�'° *�''�° ��'�• state-certified real estate ap�raiser.
° �°a'�•�''�° ^�*�• *"°'�� ^�*'�° *�°� ^ �*° °'��"'�° • °a. For purposes of determining value under
,
this subsection, improvements required pursuant to FWRC 19.30.090 (nonconforming development) and/
or 19.30.110 (streetlsidewalk improvements) shall not be counted towards the 75 percent threshold which
would trigger application of this subsection; and
(c) 'The proposal is otherwise consistent �vith the public health, safety, and welfare.
(3) Othergovernment regulations. Other than as specified in subsection (1) of this section, the city
may, using process N, exempt a property or use from any of the requirements of this chapter if:
(a) The actions or events �vhich form the basis of requiring that nonconformance on the subject
property be corrected are necessitated solely to comply with local, state or €ederal regulation;
(b) The actions necessitated to comply with those regulations will not significantly extend the
expected useful life of the nonconforming aspect; and
(c) 'The public benefit of complying with the local, state or federal regulation clearly outweighs
the public Uenefit in correcting the nonconformance.
(Ord. No. 04-468, § 3, 11-16-04; Ord. No_ O 1-398, § 2, 7- t 7-O 1; Ord. No. 97-307, § 3, 12-16-97; Ord. No. 92-144,
§ 3(t65.50), 6-16-92; Ord. No. 92-13�. � 3(ib�.�0), 4-21-92; Ord. No.91-113, § 4(165.50), 12-3-91; Ord. No_ 90-
43, § 2(165.50), 2-27-90. Eormerty 22-340. Code 2001 y � 22-339.)
Page 9 of 10
K�2009 Code Amendmen[SWDU and :lppraisai Ciarificaticv+,Planning Comm�ssion�..appraisal'�Stat7 Report and P�vposed Code LanguagdExhibit C Chapta 19 30 Nonconformace�.doc
�������� �
F�t�� / 7 �� �
19.30.200 Special provision for damaged improvements.
If a nonconforming improvement is damaged by sudden accidental cause, that improvement may be
reconstructed only if it meets the following requirements and not otherwise:
(1) The cost of reconstructing the damaged improvement does not exceed 75 percent of the assessed
or appraised value of that improvement prior to the damage; except that no cost limit applies to the
reconstruction of damaged improvements in the city center core and frame, and the director may require
minor upgrades to the rebuilt improvements that are intended to achieve a greater level of compliance
with the site and design guidelines in this title; and provided, that the upgrades are reasonably related to
the improvement(s) and proportional to the reconstruction costs.
^''«'�° : ° °�+ ...'�:�'�'���'�°°� -'�-�^^°a The appraisal must be from a ° *'��� ; °~+^'�'° �^
t�ie� state-certified real estate a� rp aiser. T'"° _.,..........� ; a°. �'.�Y:::_�' a:__=*_�_ __.�; _°1�__° *_'�°
. ,
(2) The improvement, as reconstructed, is not any more nonconforming than it was immediately prior
to the damage.
(3) The applicant applies for building and any land use permits to reconstruct the damaged
improvement within six months of the date of the damage and reconstructs the improvement pursuant to
such permits.
(Ord. No_ 06-515, § 3, 2-7-06; Ord. No. 04-468, § 3, i 1-16-04; Ord. No. 97-307, § 3, 12-16-97; Ord. No. 92-144,
§ 3(t6530), 6-16-92; Ord. No. 92-135, § 3(165.30), 4-21-92; Ord. No. 91-113, § 4(165.30), 12-3-9t; Ord. No. 90-
43, § 2(16530), 2-27-90_ Code 2001 � 22-343.)
Page 10 of 10
K:\:009 Code AmendmrntsWDU and Appreisal Clarificaz'an�Planning Commissinn�App�aisal�StatT Repon and Proposed Code i.anguage�Ezhibit C Ch�ta 19.30 Yonwnf�rnace.doc
��I���1�' l
PA�E r8 �r �
EXHIBIT D
Federal Way Revised Code
Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code"
19.135.030 When public improvements must be instatted.
(1) The applicant shall provide the improvements required by this chapter if the applicant
engages in any activity which requires a development permit, except for the following:
(a) The applicant need not comply with the provisions of this chapter if the proposed
improvements in any 12-month period do not exceed 25 percent of the assessed or appraised
value (based on ����sa�-a state-certified real estate appraiser provided by the applicant)
of all structures and land combined on the subject property, whichever is greater, except that if
the subject property is equal to or greater than 100,000 square feet in size, the land value shall not
be included in the assessed or appraised value used to determine the 25 percent. If the 25 percent
threshold is exceeded, public improvements will be required under FWRC 19.135.040 to the
extent they are commensurate with the impacts of the development, as determined by the director.
(b) The appiicant need not comply with the provisions of this chapter if, within the
immediately preceding four years, public improvements were installed as part of any subdivision
or discretionary land use approval under this or any prior zoning code.
(c) The applicant need not comply with the provisions of this chapter if the proposal is to
locate a personal wireless services facility (PWSF) on the subject properly.
(d) The applicant need not comply with the provisions of this chapter if the proposal is
for facade improvements oniy. In addition, the cost of improvements required by Chapter 19.115
FWRC, Community Design Guidelines, shall not be included in the total cost of improvements
measured over a 12-month period pursuant to subsection (1)(a) of this section.
(e) Tenant improvements, unless the proposed improvements add additional floor area.
(� If the required improvement is part of a larger project that has been scheduled for
construction in the city's adopted six-year transportation improvement program, the public works
director may permit the applicant to fulfill the applicant's obligation under this section by paying
to the city the pro rata share of the costs of the required improvements attributable to the
developmertt of the subject property, as determined by the public works director. For purposes of
determining the applicant's pro rata share, funds received by the city from any federal, state, or
local grant for the project shall be excluded from the total cost of the planned six-year
transportation improvement.
(2) Right-of-way adjacent to and within land divisions must be dedicated and improved
consistent with the requirements of this chapter, unless different requirements are imposed by the
city as part of the land division approval process.
(3) Ingress/egress and utilities easements or alleys may be permitted subject to the conditions
established in the city of Federai Way public works development standards.
(Ord. No. 07-554, § 5(Exh. A(12)), 5-15-07; Ord. No. 06-515, § 3, 2-7-06; Ord. No. 02-417, § 1, 3-19-02;
Ord. No. 02-4t4, § 3, 2-19-02; Ord. No. 00-363, § 15, 1-4-00; Ord. No. 98-330, § 3, 12-15-98; Ord. No.
90-43, � 2(110.20), 2-27-90. Code 2001 y � 22-1473.)
Page I of I
K. ��?W9 Code Ame�rtrentsWDU and?,ppraisal Clarificu�lPlanning CortunissionWppraisal�Sta(f Repon and Proposed Code Lv�guagclExMlat D Devebpmem Improvareats 19.I35.030.doc
�����!'�' �
From: Tina Piety ,�,, ,
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 9:03 AM ��'�� .(� ,��� P
To: Bill McCaffrey; Sob Cooper; Bob Roper; Brant A. Schweikl; Brett Thomas; Chad
Weiser; Chris Carrei; Christine Balyeat; Connie Boyle; Dale A. Roper; Dan Biles; Dan
Coxall; Daria Morin; Dave Matafin; Dave Thorstad; Dennis Haneberg; Don Perry ;
Gareth Roe; Garrett Huf#man; Gary Hering; Gary Martindale; Gil Hutsmann; Nans
Korve; Haynes Lund; Heidi Swartz; James Pate;leff Greene;leff Oliphant;lennifer
Dovey; lerry Heinz; 1im Jordan; lohn Bowman;lohn Norris; Jon Potter; 7ulie Ramseth;
Koong Cho; Kurt Wilson; Mark Clirehugh; Mark Freitas; Me) Easter; Mike Bailey; Mike
Behn; Mike Hovland; Monte PoweN; Paul Lymberis; Paul Manzer; Peter Townsend;
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Randy Ltoyd; Rick Olson; Rob Aigner; Rob Rueber; Rod Leland; Ron Biesold; Ron
Tremaine; Sam Pace; Scott Rhodes; Sheppard Cutler; Sid White; Steve Hammer; Steve
Kelly; Tim Atkins; Tim Osborne; Todd Suchan; Tom Barghausen; Tom Pierson; Tom
Raymond; Tony Starkovich; Tres Kirkebo
Matt Herrera; Margaret Clark; Greg Fewins; Isaac Conlen; Cary Roe; Ken Miller; lee
6ailey; William Appleton
Notice of Federal Way Planning Commission
Notice of Public Hearing.doc
Hello Federal Way Stakeholders,
On February 17, 2010, the Federal Way Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on proposed
amendments to the Federa! Way Revised Code (FWRC) regarding: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) size
calculation; clarification of appraisal requirements; and short subdivision notice requirements. Please see the
attached notice for specific information. Please address any questions and/or comments to Associate Planner
Matt Herrera at 253-835-2638, or matt.herrera�cityoffederalway_com.
_.___ ___ _
r�.��t-y, �ad��-Y�w��a�,�t�rr
Community Devefopment Services
City of Federai Way
Street: 33325 8th Avenue South
Mail: PO Sox 9718
federa! Way, WA 98063
253-835-2601; Fax 253-835-2609
EXHIBIT E
Stakeho(ders List
Updated February 2010
Bob Cooper
Lloyd Enteiprises Inc.
PO Box 3889
Federal Way, WA 98063-3859
bohc,a�t lovdenteiprises inc.co�.ii
Chris Carrel
Friend of the Hylebos
PO Box 24971
Federal Way, WA 98093
ccaiTel�;att. blackberrv. net
Dan Biles
SBI Developing
PO Box 73790
Puyallup, WA 98373
cianb,<ri,sou th�
Kurt Wilson
SBI Developing
PO Box ?3790
Puyallup, WA 98373
(253)539-8116
kurt!a�so�indbu i l tho �nes. co m
Darla Morin
Harsch Investment Properties
130i0 NE 20`� Street, Suite 450
Bellewe, WA 98005
(425) 284-5352
dartamia; harsch. con3
Julie Ramseth
Harsch Investment Properties
13010 NE 20`" Street, Suite 450
Bellevue, WA 98005
(530)450-0778
't� iiierr,�Lt�arsch.com
Don Peny
Lakehaven Utility District
PO Box 4249
Eederai Way, WA 98063
dperrX a),iakehaven ort.:
Tim Osborne, PE
Lakehaven Utility District
31627 l Avenue South
Federai V11ay, WA 98003
(253) 946-5540
tosborne(%lakeha ven.c�rt
John Bowman
Lakehaven Utility District
PO Box 4249
Federal Way, WA 98063
(253) 946-5401
jbowman �'Iakehaven.orQ
���� � �`�" r
P��� � �� �
Paul Manzer
Pacland Devetopment Consulting
11235 SE 6'� Street, Suite 220
Bellewe, WA 98004
(425)453-9501
pmanzerf pacland.com
Gil Hulsmann
Abbey Road Group Rod Leland
PO Box 1224 Federal Way Public Schools
Puyallup, WA 98371 31405 18`� Avenue South
(253) 435-3699 Federal Way, WA 98003
�il.hulsmann a abbe r� oada rleland��fwsd.u�ednet.edu
Jennifer povey
Windermere
33405 6`�' Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(206)423-8000
jsdove� ��znderm.,re.com
John Norris
Nonis Homes
2053 Faben Drive
Mercer Island, WA 98040
(206)275-1901
joluu�orris c cotncast.net
Steve Kelly
ESM Consulting Engineers
33915 1�` Way South, Suite 200
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)838-61i3
Ste��e. kelly(a'�esmci;-il.com
Mark Ciirehugh
GVA Kidder, Mathews, Se�ner
1201 Pacific Avenue, #1400
Tacoma, WA 98402
(253)722-1416
marckc(u?�akmcom
Paul Lymberis
Quadrant Homes
PO Box 130
Bellevue, WA 98009
(425)452-6556
Paul.iymberis(c�quadra�rtl�omes.co m
Sid White
Federal Way Public Schools
1066 South 320`� Slreet
Federal Way, WA 98003
(2�3) 945-5935
swhite(a?fi�ps.or�
Ron Biesold
South King Fire & Rescue
31517 1�` Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(206)227-9301
Ron.b iesold(c7southkingfire.or�
Tom Raymond
South King Fire & Rescue
31617 i Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)946-7241
, 'fom.raymondtcUSOUthkin fire.or�
Tom Pierson
Federal Way Chamber of Commerce
PO Box 4220
Federal Way, WA 98063
(253)838-2605
tomp�a�federalwaychamber.com
Sam Pace
Sea/King County Assoc of Realtors
29839 154"' Avenue SE
Kent, WA 98042-4557
(253)630-5541
sa mpace(a�concentric.net
K:' _'009 Code AmemlmentsW DU and App�aisal Clarification�Plannmg Co/renissioaV�ppraisaflStaff Report and Proposed Code Language�Exhibit E Smkeholders List.doc Page 1 of 3
G�������
PA�� � ����-
Ron Tremaine
Redstone De�
Land Acquisition and Development
17417 �433"� Street SE
North Bend, WA 9804�
recistot�eran'�i'i�e�t:nail_�c�n�
425-83 t-7730 (wk)
206-353-1761 {cell)
425-831-7783 (fax)
Monte Powell
Powell Homes
29607 8�` Avenue South
Federal Way, bVA 98003
monte!c`•�o �-eli-ho�izes.com
Garrett J. Huffman
Master Builders Association
of King/Snohomish Counties
335 116`� Avenue SE
Believue, WA 98004
ghuffmauiii-u�iialcs.co m
425-460-8236 (MBAKS)
Brant A. Schweik(, P. E.
Managing Member
Schweikl and Associates, PLLC
705 South 9�' Street, Suite 303
Tacoma, WA 98405
bschti4•eikl�wsaciviLnet
253-272-44� 1 (wk)
253-272-4495(fax)
Sumner, WA 98390
2�3-891-1030
2�3-82b-3891 (fax)
rc��ecziale��i aol.com
Gary Hering
14 �9 SW 296�' Street
Federal Way, WA 98023
gj herin�a,co c�ic as t. net
Tim Atkins
Big Mountain Enteiprises
tim;a�bit�mountainent.com
PO Box 1001
Enumcla�v, WA 98022
Bill McCaffrey
WJM Studio
1911 SW Campus Drive, Suite 116
Eederal Way, WA 98023
��j mcca ffre v�a;comcast. net
Tom Barghausen
Barghausen Consulting Engineers
i 8215 72 Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
tbarghausen(a; barghauszn.com
Peter Townsend
1648 South 310`� Street, Suite 6
Federal Way, WA 98003
253-839-2947
petert8(a�mz.coni
Auburn, WA 98032
Mark Freitas
33� 16 9` Avenue South
Federa! �Vay, WA 98003
2�3-838-8327
CT13L� tCC I(Tl� ll%CS. COt11
Tres Kirkebo
Apex Engineering
2601 3�`� Street, Suite 200
Tacoma, WA 98409
2�3-473-4494
t;irkebo(�i�apexen �in�ine_net
De►u�is Haneberg
Apex En�ineering
2b01 3� Street, Suite 200
Tacoma, WA 98409
253-473-4494
hanber�;ici',apexen in� eerin�.net
Gary Martindale
The Commons of Federal Way
1928-B South Commons Blvd
Federal Way, WA 98003
253-839-6t�6
�martindaie �iutcafv��.com
Jeff Greene
Greene Gasaway Architects
PO Box 4 i �8
Federal Way, WA 98063-4158
253-941-4937
�e ff� ��acch:'wseanet.com
Mike Behn
Quadrant, Development Manager
14725 SE 36`� Street, Suite .#200
PO Box 130
Beilevue, WA 98009
mike.behn�vquadra nthomes.c o��i
425-452-6563
425-753-48b6(cell)
Hans Korve
726 Auburn Way North
Auburn, WA 98032
hans�i?dm,p-iuc. us
253-383-2200
Bob Roper
bob.roper(�r?conicasr. n.�t
253-941-6954
Dale A Roper
The Roper Company
Landscape Architecture/Site Planning
816 Cherry Avenue, #3A
Mike Baily
LDG Architects
1319 Dexter Avenue, Suite 260
Seattle, WA 98109
206-283-4764
mike(�uld;architzc ts.com
Chad Weiser
OTAK
10236 NE Points Drive, Suite 400
Kirkland, WA 98033-7897
206-442-1359
chad. «�eiserl"a?otak.com
Christine Batyeat
New Concept Homes
PO Box 1229
Issaquah, WA 98027
hcbaiyeat(c�h�tcnaii.com
Steve Hammer
Browleit Peterson Hammer
Architects
6920 220`�' SW, Suite 200
Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043
stevet�i?bpharclLCOm
Mel Easter
Johnson Braund Design Group
15200 52 Avenue South, Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98188
206-766-8300
tnele;a jbdg.com
Koong Cho
Royal Hospitality
(Hampton Inn)
15901 West Vailey Highway
T'ukwita, WA 98188
253-318-0908
kuon �:c ��i+co mcas t. net
K:�2009 Code Miendmems�ADU and Appraisal Clanficatiom.Planning Corranission41ppraisallSraff Report and Proposed Code language\Exhibit E S+aketalders list duc Page 2 of 3
E������° l
R��� 22 -
�� �Co
Jim Jordan
(Saghalie Heights de��eloper)
j j ordan(i� iso med i a_co m
Mike Hovland
Hovland Architects
900 Meridian Avenue East, Ste 408
Miiton, WA 98354
hovazchtfa�comcast. i�et
Dave Thorstad
406 South 289"' Place
Federal Way, WA 98003
di ta� c omc as t. ne t
Dan Coxal(
Hanunes Co.
(St. Francis Hospital)
132� 4`�' Avenue, Suite 1035
Seattle, WA 98101
dcoaa ! 1(aJhammesco. com
Tony Starkovich
1611 9` Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
425-775-6�52
vi��ta�ecapital d?hatn�ail.con�
Gareth Roe
BCRA
2106 Pacitic A�enue, Suite 300
Tacoma, Wa 9$-402
2�3-627-4367
��roe(ie?bcrade:i<_n.tc�rn
Heidi Swartz
Swartz Development
5724 30`" Avenue NE
Seattle, �'VA 9810�
(206) 730-6933 cell
(206) 527-8999 fax
h�s�va:�-r!ci�cotncast.net
Brett Thomas breitl"rr�?ma
Connie Boyle connie.bovle�a�coliiers.com.
James Pate jari
JeffOliphant j1o55raol.com
Jerry Heinz ierrv.heinz�c�weverltaeuser.com
Jon Potter jpotter93fi�cac�l.con�
Randy Lloyd randvliavd�i�Yprint:blackben-v.net
Rick Olson RickOlson�a'�fhsllealth.or�
Rob Aigner roba(a?harscl�.co�n
Rob Rueber amieber{�;;conicast.37et
Scott Rhodes rhodesarchitect��re;a �mail.com
Sheppard Cutler s�vc(a),fishersons.com
Todd Suchan tsuchan�;r��iidwati�es.com
Gordon Olson Gordon.oisontir),southkingfire.or�
K:�2009 Code AmendrtientsWDU and Appraisal Clarificatic�n�Planning CommissionWpqaisallStaff Reptut and Proposed Code Language�Exfibit E Stakeholdas Listdoc Page 3 of 3
E������ (
From: Tina Piety P�l1�� 2 3 p`:� , 2(
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:40 PM
!'W 6i �
To: Bill McCaffrey; Bob Cooper; Bob Roper; Brant A. Schweikl; Brett Thomas; Chad
Weiser; Chris Carrel; Christine Balyeat; Connie 8oyle; Dale A. Roper; Dan 8ites; Dan
Coxall; Darla Morin; Dave Matafin; Dave Thorstad; Dennis Haneberg; Don Perry ;
Gareth Roe; Garrett Huffman; Gary Hering; Gary Martindale; Gil Hulsmann; Hans
Korve; Haynes Lund; Heidi Swartz; James Pate; Jeff Greene;leff Oliphant; Jennifer
Dovey; Jerry Heinz; Jim lordan; lohn Bowman; John Norris; Jon Potter; Julie Ramseth;
Koong Cho; Kurt Wilson; Mark Clirehugh; Mark Freitas; Mel Easter; Mike Bailey; Mike
Behn; Mike Hovtand; Monte Powell; Paul Lymberis; Paul Manzer; Peter Townsend;
Randy Lloyd; Rick Olson; Rob Aigner; Rob Rueber; Rod Leland; Ron Biesold; Ron
Tremaine; Sam Pace; Scott Rhodes; Sheppard Cutler; Sid White; Steve Hammer; Steve
Kelly; Tim Atkins; Tim Osborne; Todd Suchan; Tom Barghausen; Tom Pierson; Tom
Raymond; Tony Starkovich; Tres Kirkebo
Cc: Matt Herrera; Margaret Ciark; Greg Fewins; lsaac Conlen; Lee Bailey; Cary Roe; Ken
Miller; Marwan Salloum; William Appleton
Subject: Federal Way Planning Commission
Attachments: Exhibit D Stakeholders List.doc; ADU Staff Report.doc; Exhibit A Revised SE
Charc.doc; Exhibit B Revised RS Chart.doc; Exhibit C Stakeholders List.doc; Exhibit F
Stakeholders List.doc; Appraisal Staff Report.doc; Exhibit A Surface Water
Management 16.15.010.doc; Exhibit B Subdivisions 18.55.060.doc; Exhibit C Chapter
19.30 Nonconformace.doc; Exhibit D Development Improvements 19.135.030.doc;
Exhibit E Stakeholders list.doc; Notice Sign Staff Report.doc; Exhibit A Proposed
Language.doc; Exhibit B Stakeholders Lis#.doc; Exhibit C Stakeholders List.doc
Hello Federal Way Stakeholders,
On February 17th, the Federal Way Planning Commission will be holding public hearings on proposed
amendments to the Federa! Way Revised Code (FWRC) regarding: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) size
calculation; clarification of appraisal requirements; and changes to short subdivision notice requirements_
Attached you will find the Planning Commission agenda and staff reports and exhibits for the proposed
amendments. if you have any questions, please contact Associate Planner Matt Herrera at 253-835-2638, or
matt herrera�?cityoffederalway.com.
Ti.vt.a� t iety, �l d.i��i,vu�-trat'w� �t �i�ta.ri,t II
Community Development Services
City of Federal Way
Street: 33325 8th Avenue South
Mail: PO Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063
253-835-2601; fax 253-835-2609
EXHIBIT F
Stakeholders List
Updated February 2010
8ob Cooper
Lloyd Enterprises Inc.
PO Box 3889
Federal Way, WA 98063-3889
bobcta: I lovdznte r�risesinc.com
Chris Carret
Friend of the Hylebos
PO Box 24971
Federal Way, WA 98093
cc arreita�att.blackberry.net
Dan Biles
SBI Devetoping
PO Box 73790
Puyallup, WA 98373
danb d.soundbuilthomes_com
Kurt Wiison
SBI Devetoping
PO Box 73790
Puyallup, WA 98373
(253)539-8116
kurt{a;soimdbui Ithames.co�i�
Darla Morin
Harsct► Investment Properties
i 3010 NE 20�' Street, Suite 450
Bellewe, WA 98005
(425)284-5352
dartam(a%harsch.com
Julie Ramseth
Harsch Investment Properties
13010 NE 20'� Street, Suite 450
Bellevue, WA 98005
(530)450-0778
�ul! ierr,u,,l�arsch.com
Don Perry
Lakehaven Utility District
PO Box 4249
Federal Way, WA 98063
dperry�a?lakehaven.org
Tim Osborne, PE
Lakehaven Utility District
31627 l u Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
{253)946-5540
tosiwrne� lakeha ve►i.or�
John Bowman
Lakehaven Uti(ity Distr[ct
PO Box 4249
Federal lVay, �VA 98063
(253) 9�46-5401
jbo�vman!a; lakelta�-v ri.or�
EX�'����'
Q������ �
Paul Manzer
Pacland Development Consulting
11235 SE 6'� Street, Suite 220
Bellevue, WA 98004
(42�)453-9501
pnianzeria�pacland.com
Git Hutsmann
Abbey Road Group Rod Leland
PO Box 1224 Federal Way Public Schools
Puyallup, WA 98371 3140� 18`� Avenue South
{2�3) 435-3699 Federal Way, WA 98003
jil.ht+ls►narn:ciabhe�r�ad�rr��iip.com rlelandcFi�f��s•sd.t�rednet.edu
Jennifer povey
Windermere
33405 6�' Avenue South
Federal �Vay, lVA 93003
(206) 423-5000
isdc�vev!ci-�4•inderm;:i��.com
John Norris
Norris Homes
2053 Faben Drive
Mercer Island, �VA 98040
{206)27�-1901
jolumoit'is;a?co���Lasi_ itet
Steve Kel(y
ESM Consulting Engineers
33915 i'` �Vay South, Suite 200
Federal Way, V6'A 98003
{253)838-61t3
Steve.keilv!ii�esmci�•ii.com
Mark Clirehugh
GVA Kidder, Mathetivs, Segner
120i Pacific Avenue, #1400
Tacoma, WA 98�02
(253)722-1416
marckc(iue��akm.com
Paul Lymberis
Quadrant Homes
PO Box 130
Bellevue, WA 98009
(425)452-6556
Paut�tvmberis!ci<�c ua.ci
Sid White
Federal Way Public Schools
1066 South 320`� Street
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)945-�935
swh itela� E�ti�s.or�
Ron Biesold
South King Fire & Rescue
31617 1�` Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(206)227-9301
Ron.bieso ld�>southl:in� fire. or�
Tom Raymond
South King Fire & Rescue
31617 1 Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)946-7241
Tom. raymondC southicin�fire.or�
Tom Pierson
Federal Way Chamber of Commerce
PO Box 4220
Federal Way, WA 98063
(253)838-2605
tomp cacn
Sam Pace
Sea/King County Assoc of Realtors
29839 154�' Avenue SE
Kent, WA 98042-4557
(253)630-5541
sampacef v�i;concentric.net
K:�?009 Code AmeodmentslADU a�d Appraisal C1ari6cation�Planning CortunissionUppraisaf�Staff Repc�� and Prop�sed Code Language�Exhibit F Stakelwldus List.doc Page 1 of 3
����;���
PA�� 2 � �� 2. _____�°
Ron Tremaine
Redstone Developnient
Land Acquisition and Devetopment
17417 433 Street SE
North Bend, WA 9804�
re dstonemn:�i-itotmail.co n�
42�-831-7730 (wk)
206-353-1761 (cetl)
425-831-7783 (fax)
Monte Powetl
Powell Homes
29607 8�' Avenue South
Eederal Way, WA 98003
mc.� nie'�%.powell -homes.com
Garrett J. Huffman
Master Builders Association
of King/Snohomish Counties
33� 116`� Avenue SE
Bellevue, WA 98004
�tiuffmanr �mbaks.com
425-450-8236 (MBAKS)
Brant A. Schweikl, P.E.
Managing Member
Schweikl and Associates, PLLC
70� South 9�` Street, Suite 303
Tacoma, WA 98405
bschwe iklfcisaci oii. net
253-272-4451 (wic)
2�3-272-4495(fax)
Sumner, WA 98390
253-891-1030
253-826-3891 (fax)
roperda leitc%aal.com
Gary Hering
1439 SW 296�' Street
Federal Way, WA 98023
gjherin� comcasL iiet
Tim Atkins
Big Mountain Enterprises
tim@bigmountainent. con3
PO $ox 1001
Enumclaw, WA 98022
Bill McCaffrey
WJM Studio
1911 SW Campus Drive, Suite i(6
Federal Way, WA 98023
wj mccaffrey�i`comcas�. net
Tom Barghausen
Barghausen Consulting En�ineers
18215 72" Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
tbarghauszn�abar�hauszn.com
Peter Townsend
1648 South 310`�` Street, Suite 6
Federal Way, WA 98003
253-839-2947
petert8{�i�nie.com
Auburn, WA 98032
Mark Freitas
33�16 9�' Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
253-838-8327
anarkfcc iin(a;•es.com
Tres Kirkebo
Apex En�ineering
2601 35 Street, Suite 200
Tacoma, WA 98409
253-473-4494
kirkebo�tapexen g i neerin 2. net
Dennis Haneberg
Apex En�ineering
2601 35 Street, Suite 200
Tacoma, WA 98409
253-473-4494
hanberg cr.apexengineering. ne t
Gary Martindale
The Commons of Federal Way
1928-B South Commons Bivd
Federal Way, WA 98003
253-839-6156
gmartindale(
Jeff Greene
Greene Gasaway Architects
PO Box 4158
Federal Way, WA 98063-4158
253-941-4937
jeff ��garch�seanet.com
vtike Behn
Quadrant, Development Manager
14725 SE 36`� Street, Suite #200
PO Box 130
Be(ie�ue, WA 98009
mike. beh�t(�uyuaci� mes.com
42�-452-6563
42�-753-4866(cell)
Hans Korve
726 Auburn Way North
Auburn, WA 98032
han�i�I;:dmp-iiic. us
253-383-2200
Bob Roper
bob. ro�er�a;co mcast. net
253-941-b9�4
Dale A Roper
The Roper Company
Landscape Architecture/Site Planning
816 Cherry Avenue, #3A
Mike Baily
LDG Architects
1319 Dexter Avenue, Suite 260
Seattle, WA 98109
206-283-4764
mike(r��architects.com
Chad Weiser
OTAK
10236 NE Points Drive, Suite 400
Kirkland, WA 98033-7897
206-442-1359
chad weiser(�otak.com
Christine Balyeat
New Concept Homes
PO Box 1229
Issaquah, WA 98027
hcbalyeat(a hot�naii.coin
Steve Hammer
Browleit Peterson Hammer
Architects
6920 220�' SW, Suite 200
Mountiake Terrace, WA 98043
steve{a;�p112I'cki.com
Mel Easter
Johnson Braund Design Group
15200 52 Avenue South, Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98188
206-766-8300
mele rr�jbdg.com
Koong Cho
Royal Hospitality
(Hampton Inn)
15901 West Valley Highway
Tukwila, WA 98188
253-318-0908
koon�c(d?comcast. net
K�.�?009 Code Amendments4lDC: and Appraisai ClariFication�Planning ComnissionlAppraisallStatf Repon ard Proposed Code l.anguage\Ezh'bit F Stakelaldas Liri.doc Page 2 of 3
Jim Jordan
(Sa�halie Heights deveioper)
�j�rdaai��i isu�t��ciia.�gm
Mike Hovland
Hoviand Architects
900 Meridian �venue East, Ste 408
Milton, WA 93354
ho�-archt;ci�cc�mcast. i;ex
Dave T'horstad
406 South 289` Ptace
Federal Way, WA 98003
dltarchitect;a.�omcast. ne#
Dan Cosall
Hammes Co.
(St. Francis Hospitat)
i325 4` Avenue, Suite 103�
Seattle, WA 98101
dco.r• a llta�ha mme sca. eo m
Tony Starkovich
16l 1 9�' Avenue North
Edmonds, �VA 98020
425-775-6�52
v in ta�ecapi tal(a�ho m�ai 1. con�
Brett Thomas brett�a?nlountainconst.cotn
Connie Boyle c�nnie.bovle�ci�coltiers.com
James Pate jamesp(a�;harsch.cam
JeffOtiphant jlo���a;;aol_com
Jerry Heinz jerrv.heinz�i�weyerhaeuser.conl
Jon Potter jpotte+
Randy Lloyd rancivllc�vd(�i�xprint.blackbeny.net
Rick Olson RickOlson(ii�fhshealtli.orQ
Rob Aigner roba�ruharscl�.com
Rob Rueber am�eber�u;comcast.net
Scott Rhodes rhodesarchitecture(aigmail.com
SheppardCutler sc�_e',a-tishersons.com
Todd Suchan tsuchan!ci:� ti_iidwaves.com
Gordon Olson Gardon.olson(aisouthkin;rtire.org
E�C�f����' �
Gar ��4� 2� �� Z�
B��
2106 Pacific Avenue, Suite 300
Tacoma, WA 98402
2�3-627-4367
Lroei{i:bcradesi =n.�, com
Heidi Swartz
Swartz Development
�724 30`� Avenue NE
Seattle, WA 98105
(206) 730-6933 cell
(206) 527-8999 fax
hpswartz(c?comcast.net
K:�'009 Code Amendnxnts'+,�.DU and Ap�raisal Clarifiwtion\Plartning ComrttissionWppraisaASwff Repoit and Proposcd Code Language`�EKhibe F Srakehoiders Lis�.doc Page 3 of 3
C[TY OF FEDER�L VV�►Y
PLANNING COMMISSION
February 17, 2010 City EIail
7:00 p.m. Council Chambers
MEETING MINUTES
Commissioners present: Merle Pfeifer, Hope Elder, Sarady Long, Lawson Bronson, Wayne Carlson, Tom
Medhurst, and Tim O'Neii. Commissioners absent: none. Staff present: Pianning Manager Isaac Conien,
Senior Planner Margaret Clark, Assistant City Attorney Peter Beckwith, and Administrative Assistant Tina
Piety.
Chair Pfeifer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of January 20, 2010, were approved as written.
AUDIENCE COI�tMENT
Commissionner Carison commented that two Federal Way residents won Silver and Bronze metals this last
weekend at the Olympic Games. He feels the city should consider acirnowledging their achievement. Mr.
Conlen replied that Mayor Kochmar had noted the same at last night's City Council meeting and stated
that some sort of recognition and or ceremony will be planned.
ADMIN[STRAT[VE REPORT
Mr. Conten noted that Associate Planner Matt Herrera, who was scheduled to deliver tonight's staff reports
is out sick. Mr. Conlen and Ms. Clark will be delivering the staff reports. As an FYI to the Commission,
Mr. Conien reported that the 23`� Avenue Condos/Skyway Hotel (a mixed-use project with residential,
hotel, office, and retail) is in the preapplication phase. They are planning two towers, one approximately
400 feet in height and the second approximately 200 feet in height.
COMMISSION BUS[IYESS
PUBLiC HEA[t[NG — Accessory Dwetling Unit Size Calculations
Mr. Conlen delivered the staff report. T'he proposed code amendments will clarify what portions of the
structure should be included in the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) size calculation; remove the 15,000
square foot lot size threshold for detached ADUs; and make housekeeping amendments to ADU use zone
charts. Current FWRC regulations do not clearly define what areas are included in the ADU size
calculation. The proposed amendment wouid specifically exclude garages, workshops, and similar non-
living areas from the ADU size calculation. Removal of the 15,000 square foot (ot size threshold would
ailow detached ADUs on all lots.
Same Pace, Seattle/King County Association of Realtors — He commented that the association
supports the proposed amendments. 1) They support the removal of the I 5,000 square foot
threshold because it is inconsistent with the lots available in Federal Way. 2) The prescriptive
provisions are dysfunctional. 3) The proposed amendments pass the common sense test. 4) The
proposed amendments retain protections that ADUs will be smaller in size than the principal
C:\pocuments and $ettings�rtntth�Ltxal SatingsiTenporary fotemet Piks�Comeat.0utlook�[,LX2CE8V�Meetmg Suoanvy 02-17-10 ('_) doc �i �u ���� �
i� i1 A
PA�E ( (���
Placuiin,� Comnussion �(inutes Page 2 February 17, 2010
buiiding.
Commissioner O'Nei( asked if there can be a breezeway to a detached ADU, or would ti�at be considered
an attached ADU. 11�Ir. Conlen replied that as long as it is a non-shuctura(, non-supporting breezeway, the
ADU wouid be considered detached. It is possible the building could be so close together that the city
would consider the ADU to be attached.
Commissioner O'Nei! asked if the ADU cou(d be rented. Could an owner build an ADU for the sole purpose
of renting it out as a financial venture? Mr. Conlen repiied that an owner could build an ADU for the sole
purpose of renting it out as a tinancial venture. The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) does require the
owner to live on the property, either in the principal residence or the ADU. Commissioner Long asked how
this can be enforced. Mr. Beck�uith replied that most enforcement in the city is compliant based, meaning
that if someone complains about who is living in an ADU, the city will research the issue. Mr. Conlen
commented that the o�vner is required to sign a document that runs with the land stating the owner wiil dweil
on the property.
Commissioner O'Neil asked for a clarification of what is meant by average building elevation the height of
the structure and grade_ Ntr. Conlen explained the terms. He also stated that an ADU cannot exceed the
height of the principal structure.
Commissioner Long asked how may ADUs has the city approved. Ms. Clark replied that the city had a lot
of existing ADUs when w�e incorporated_ The city worked with the owners to bring them into compliance.
Since the city incorporated there have been only approximately 5 new ADUs, bringing the total of new and
existing to 25 to 30 ADUs. Commissioner Long commented that since it is likely that more than one car
will be parked on a lot, does the city anticipate any parking issues? Mr. Conlen replied that typically there
is adequate room for parking.
Commissioner Carlson moved (and it was secondec� to recommended adoption of the staff's
recommendation for the proposed amendments for the Accessory Dwelling Unit Size Calculation. The
motion carried unanimously. The public hearing was closed,
PUBL[C HEARING — CtariGcation of Appraisal Requirements
Ms. Clark delivered the staff report. The intent of the proposed amendments is to clarify and make
consistent who is authorized to conduct an appraisal. There are ten sections of the FWRC that require an
appraisal. Of those, two require an MAI appraisal, which is a professional accreditation by the Appraisal
Institute, a private association of real estate appraisers. The remaining eight require an appraisal that is,
"acceptable to the city." In addition, the city may require a second appraisal if the valuation of the first is
considered inappropriate_ Staff proposes that the language be changed to require the appraisal be
performed by a state certified appraiser. Language allowing the city to request a second appraisal will be
removed.
Same Pace, Seattle/King County Association of Realtors — He commented that the association
supports the proposed amendments. 1) They are pleased the proposed amendments remove
inconsistencies. 2) They are pleased the proposed amendments leave in the choice of an
assessment or appraisal. 3) The proposed amendments ensure the appraiser meets the highest legal
standard. 4) The proposed amendments minimize the potential for a second appraisal. 5) The
proposed amendments are efficient and reduce costs.
Commissioner Long asked with the requirement of a state certified appraiser, is it likely the owner would
C:1Documems and Settings`matth\Local Senings'-.Terrqwrary lniema Pilzs�.Contem.0utbok\[.I,X2CP8WNeeting Sum�y 02-17-10 (2).doc ��� ����
PA�� �- 0�-
Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 Fcbtuary 17. 2010
want to use an appraiser certified by another state. Ms. Clark replied the city would require a �Vashin�ton
state appraiser.
Same Pace, Seattle/King Coz�rity �ssocia�ion of Realtors — He commented that the state requires
that the state certified appraiser be geo-competent, which would be unlikely with an out-of-state
appraiser.
Commissioner Medhurst why is the city giving the choice of an assessed value or an appraisal, why not
just the assessed value? Ms. Clark repiied that city wants to be flexible and give applicants a choice. She
noted that the proposed arr►endments do not address the issue if a choice should be available, but simply
clarify who is authorized to conduct an appraisal.
Commissioner Bronson expressed concern that the city may question the appraised value; specifically, that
a staff inember without appraisai experience may quesrion an experience appraiser. Ms. Clark rep(ied that
staff would only question an appraisal that was unreasonable and would have to have a reason to yuestion
the appraisal. If a question arose, a state certified appraiser would be hired to perform the second appraisal.
Same Pace, Seattle/King County Association of Realtors — He commented that an assessment is
done once a year (with an appeal period)_ If the economy changes, by the time the owner applies to
the city, the value may have changed. In such a case, an owner may be better off submitting an
appraised value as opposed to the assessed value.
Commissioner Bronson moved to recommended adoption of the stat�s recommendation for the proposed
amendments to Clarify the Appraisal Requirements. The motion carried unanimously. T'he pubiic hearing
was closed.
PUBLIC HEARING — Short Subdivision Notice Requirements
Ms. Clark delivered the staff report. Current FWRC regulations require the posting of three onsite notice
boards on or near the subject property. The proposed amendment would reduce the requirement to one
onsite board, with the ability to post additional boards if needed. Three onsite notice boards are not
necessary as many properties only abut one right-of-way. The proposed amendment would reduce costs
associated with providing norice boards and staff time to post boards. T'he proposed amended language
would require additional notice boards to be posted if staff finds that they are needed to clearly identify the
property.
Same Pace, Seattle/King Counry Association of Realtors — He commented that the association
supports the proposed amendments. 1) A short subdivision may be a division into only two lots
and the requirement for three notices boards is excessive in such instances. 2) The proposed
amendment fits smaller lots, of which there are many in Federal Way. 3) The "if needed"
language referring to additional notice boards is ambiguous, but the Association is willing to wait
to see how it works. 4) The notice board is not the only notice given.
Commissioner Carlson commented that he supports the proposed amendment and that the only downside
he sees is the city may receive complaints that one notice board is not adequate notice. Commissioner
O'Neil asked what happens if a notice board is defaced. Ms. Clark responded that if the city is told, the
board would be replaced.
Commissioner O'Neil moved to recommended adoption of the staf�s recommendation for the proposed
amendments to Short Subdivision Notice Requirements. The motion carried unanimously. The public
C\Documems and Stttings4natth�Lacat Settings\Temporary Imemet f7es��Comrnt Outbok�l.LX2CF8V�Metting Swrenary 03-17-10 (2).doe ��� ���� �
PA�� 3 �� `�
Planning Conutiission Minutes Page 4 February 17, 2010
hearing was closed.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
Staff anticipates there will be no meetings in March.
go before the City Council on March 16`�'.
The 2010 Planning Commission Work Program will
AUDIENCE COMMENT
Same Pace, Seattle/King County Association of Realtors — He commented that the city has a good list of
stakeholders.
ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
C.1Documents and Settings�matth\Local Satmgs\Tempotary Intema Fila�Contwt.Dutlook�LLX'<CF8V�Meet'vig Sumlcvy 02-17-10 (2).doc
������� �
PAGE�t���
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to
appraisals; amending FWRC 16.15.010, 16.15.010(2)(g), 18.55.060(2),
19.30.080(1)(b), 19.30.090(i)(�, 19.30.100(9)(c)(ii), 19.30.120(1)(g), 19.30.120(2)(c),
19.30.130(2), 19.30.130(3), 19.30.160(2)(b), 19.30.200(1), and 19.135.030(1)(a).
(Amending Ordinance Nos. 09-595, 07-554, 06-515, OS-486, 04-468, 02-420, OZ-
419, 02-417, 02-414, O1-398, 00-363, 99-357, 99-352, 98-330, 98-309, 97-307, 97-
291, 95-235, 92-144, 92-135, 91-113, 90-43, and 90-41)
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the need to periodically modify Title 16 "Surface Water
Management," Title 18 "Subdivisions," and Title 19 "Zoning and Development Code," of the Federal
Way Revised Code (FWRC) in order to conform to state and federal law; codify administrative practices;
clarify and update surface water management, subdivisions, and zoning regulations as deemed necessary;
and improve the efficiency of the regulations and the development review process; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance, containing amendments to development regulations and the text of
Title 16, Title 18, and Title 19 FWRC, has complied with Process VI review, chapter 19.80 FWRC,
pursuant to chapter 19.35 FWRC; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the City Council to adopt new amendments for the
FWRC which establishes consistent development regulations for who is authorized to conduct an
appraisal within the City of Federal Way; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the City Council to adopt new amendments for the
FWRC which removes the requirement for a MAI appraisal and source acceptable to the city, but
maintains a professional standard that requires appraisals be conducted by a state certified real estate
appraiser; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the City Council to adopt new amendments for the
FWRC which removes unnecessary second appraisal requirements; and
WHEREAS, an Environmental Threshold Determination was not necessary as the amendments
are related solely to governmental procedures and therefore, categorically exempt from the State
Environmental Policy Act; and
Ordinance No. 10- Page 1 of 9
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission properly conducted a duly noticed public hearing on these
code amendments on February 17, 2010, and forwarded a recommendation of approval; and
WHEREAS, the Land Use/Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council
considered these code amendments on March 1, 2010, and recommended adoption of the text
amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCII, OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section l. Findin�s. The City Council of the City of Federal Way makes the following findings
with respect to the proposed amendments.
(a} These code amendments are in the best interest of the residents of the City and will benefit
the City as a whole by providing a consistent and unambiguous requirement for those persons eligible to
conduct an appraisal.
(b) These code amendments comply with Chapter 36.70A RCW, Growth Management.
(c) These code amendments are consistent with the intent and purpose of Title 16, Title 18, and
Title 19 of the FWRC and will implement and are consistent with the applicable provisions of the Federal
Way Comprehensive Pdan.
(d) These code amendments bear a substantial relationship to, and will protect and not adversely
affect, the public health, safety, and welfare.
(e) These code amendments have followed the proper procedure required under the FWRC.
Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to chapter 19.80 FWRC and chapter 19.35 FWRC, and based
upon the recitals and the findings set forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council makes the
following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the adoption of the
proposed amendments:
(a) The proposed FWRC amendments are consistent with, and substantially implement, the
following Federal Way Comprehensive Plan goals and policies:
LUP4 — Maximizes efficiency of the development review process.
Ordinance No. 10- Page 2 of 9
LUP6 — Conduct regular reviews of the development regulations to determine how to
improve upon the permit review process.
(b) The proposed FWRC amendments bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety,
and welfare because they provide a consistent appraisal requirement and maintain professional standards
for those who conduct such appraisals.
(c) The proposed amendments are in the best interest of the public and the residents of the City
of Federal Way because they require appraisals submitted to the city to be prepared by state-certified
appraisers.
Section 3. FWRC 16.15.010 is hereby amended to read as follows:
The following activiries are subject to the provisions of this title, .
Section 4. FWRC 16.15.010(2)(g) is hereby amended to read as follows:
Redevelopment other than normal maintenance or other than tenant improvements, but including
any increase in gross floor area, in any one consecutive 12-month period which exceeds 50 percent of the
assessed or appraised value �•-,";�'�°�,°° ;� �°°*°r` of the structure or improvement being redeveloped_
The appraisal shall be conducted by a state-certified real estate appraiser; or
Section 5. FWRC 18.55.060(2) is hereby amended to read as follows:
All residential subdivisions, except for cottage housing, and zero lot line townhouse development,
shall be required to provide open space in the amount of 15 percent of the gross land area of the
subdivision site. Open space requirements for zero lot line townhouse development are found in FWRC
19205.010 and open space requirements for cottage housing are found in FWRC 19.250.070 and
19.250.080. Except for subdivisions created under FWRC 18.55.040, and small lot detached development
created under FWRC 18.25.030, a fee-in-lieu payment may be made to satisfy open space requirements at
the discretion of the parks director after consideration of the city's overall park plan, quality, location, and
service area of the open space that would otherwise be provided within the project. If the city determines
that the location, quality, or extent of the required project open space, particularly on smaller plats, short
plats, or other divisions of land, would not fulfill the intent or purpose of useful common open space, a
payment of an equivalent fee-in-lieu of the required project open space shall be paid.
The fee-in-lieu of open space shall be calculated on 15 percent of the most recent assessed value of the
properly. In the absence of an assessment, the market value shall be based on an appraisal conducted by a
Ordinance No. 10- Page 3 of 9
state-certified
real estate appraiser. If the applicant offers to pay money in lieu of open space, and if the city accepts the
offer, the amount shall be determined based upon the square footage of open space which otherwise
would have been required to be provided, times the then current market value per square foot of similarly
situated properiy. For lots within an existing subdivision, where open space was already dedicated or a
fee-in-lieu paid, the percent of open space required will be the difference between the open space
dedicated prior and 15 percent. Any fees collected shall be urilized within the park comprehensive plan
planning area that the subject property falls within, unless the applicant by voluntary agreement directs
the expenditures of such fees in a different planning area. Open space created through small lot detached
development shall be protected from further subdivision or development by covenants �led and recorded
with the final plat of the subdivision. All usable open space must be readily identifiable with the
development and easily accessible by the residents. Usable open space should be the central focus and an
amenity for the project.
Section 6. FWRC 19.30.080(1)(b) is hereby amended to read as follows:
Other than as specified in subsection (1)(a) of this section, the applicant is making changes or
alterations or doing work, other than normal maintenance, in any one consecutive 12-month period to any
structure that houses or supports the nonconforming use and the fair market value of that change,
alteration or work exceeds 15 percent of the assessed or appraised value of that structure. �e-a�isa�
. The appraisal must be from a se�se
*��* �� °„*�'�'° *� *�° ��*�• state-certified real estate appraiser.
. ,
;
Section 7. FWRC 19.30.090(1)( fl is hereby amended to read as follows:
The applicant is making any alteration or changes or doing any work, other than normal
maintenance, tenant improvements, or minor additions noted in subsection (1)(c)(iv) of this section, in
any one consecutive 12-month period to an improvement that is nonconforming and the fair market value
of the alteration, change or other work exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value of that
improvement. . The appraisal must be from a
° °„*^'�'° *^ *'�° ^�*�� state-certified real estate appraiser. ''''�° a�r°�+�- ° ° +�'° ^ "''^^^+ `^
Ordinance No. JO- Page 4 of 9
. ,
*'�° , ���°r �� *'�° *��.� ��� �'��„ '�° „ �°a In the event this subsection is triggered with respect to a
single-tenant or single-occupant site, the applicant shall meet all development regulations applicable to
the property. In the event this subsection is triggered with respect to a site occupied by multiple tenants or
uses, the applicant shall comply with those development regulations applicable to the geographic portion
of the site on which the alteration, change or improvement is proposed. For purposes of this determining
value under this section, improvements required pursuant to this section (nonconforming development),
FWRC 19.30.110 (when public improvements must be installed), 1930.120 (nonconforming water
quality improvements) and 19.135.030 (when public improvements must be installed) shall not be
counted towards the 50 percent threshold which would trigger application of this subsection.
Section 8. FWRC 19.30.100(9)(c)(ii) is hereby amended to read as follows:
(ii) The applicant is making any changes, alterations, or performs work other than normal
maintenance or other than tenant improvements to any structure or improvement that houses or supports
the use with which the nonconforming sign is associated, and the fair market value of those changes,
alterations, or other work, in any one consecutive 12-month period, exceeds 75 percent of the assessed or
a�praised value of that structure or improvement�s-de�er�°�Tt�e-�i�C-e�-essesse��e
. The appraisal must be from a sei.�se
state-certi�ed real estate appraiser.
. ,
. For purposes of determining value under this subsection,
improvements required pursuant to FWRC 19.30.090 (nonconforming development) and/or 19.30.110
(street/sidewalk improvements) shall not be counted towards the 75 percent threshold, which would
trigger application of this subsection.
Section 9. FWRC 19.30.120(1)(g) is hereby amended to read as follows:
Redevelopment, other than normal maintenance or other than the tenant improvements, but
including any increase in gross floor area, in any one consecutive 12-month period which exceeds 50
percent of the assessed or appraised value (whichever is greater) of the structure or improvement being
redeveloped. . The appraisal must be from s
state-certified Qeneral appraiser. ''''�° „•�'�'�^ � �~'�° a��°^+^r Y~ ° ° +''°
Ordinance No. 10- Page S of 9
a �--. ��� �;*-, *�� M-��*�r ��' *�� *,-,� � r+� �'��" '�° � °a. For purposes of determining value
,
under this section, improvements required pursuant to FWRC 19.30.090 (nonconforming development),
FWRC 1930.110 (street/sidewalk improvements), this section (nonconforming water quality
improvements) and FWRC 19.135.030 (streetJsidewalk improvements) shall not be counted towards the
50 percent threshold which would trigger application of this subsection;
Section 10. FWRC 19.30.120(2)(c) is hereby amended to read as follows:
Calculation of redevelopment value. For purposes of calculating the value of redevelopment in
order to apply subsection (2)(a) of this section, the public works director shall consider the cost of the
proposed redevelopment as a percentage of the assessed or appraised value ����'���'�°°°-� �° ^•'°°�°_' of all
structures on the subject property. T� � ��: .� ....�a :. :::.:�: '�° ~~°~�r°a '�.. �_ *'`"T ",.,._";�e'
e Y'• • —
o--*�,�,e +� F�.e �;*-, ra ��;a �-- ��a �,.wm;**va �.., *�,o � r';���« The appraisal must be from a state
�
certified real estate appraiser.
Section 1 l. FWRC 19.30.130(2) is hereby amended to read as follows:
Other than as specified in subsection (1) of this section, the nonconforming use or density must
be corrected if the applicant is making changes, alterations or doing other work, other than normal
maintenance, in any 12-month period to any structure on the subject property containing multi-unit
housing (attached and/or stacked dwelling units) and fair market value of these changes, alterations or
other work exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value of that mulri-unit structure. �ke
. The appraisal must be from a set�se-�a�--�'s
state-certified real estate appraiser. '�'� ~��• a°�'°'�" ''"'°^*°"
. �
. Changes, alterations, additions or other work is subject to all applicable
requirements of this Code including but not limited to provisions related to critical areas (FWRC Title 19,
Division V), off-street parking (Chapter 19.130 FWRC), improvements (Chapter 19.135 FWRC), and
landscaping (Chapter 19125 FWRC).
Section 12. FWRC 1930.130(3) is hereby amended to read as follows:
Other than as specified in subsection (1) of this section, the nonconforming use or density must
be corrected if the applicant is making changes, alterations, adding improvements or doing other work
other than normal maintenance, in any 36-month period, on the subject property containing a single-
family use and fair market value of these changes, alterations, additions or other work exceeds 75 percent
of the assessed or appraised value of that single-family structure. Changes, alterations, additions or other
Ordinance No. 10- Page 6 of 9
work must comply with all bulk, dimensional and other development requirements for a single-family
detached dwelling located in the RS 7.2 zone (FWRC 19.200.010). `'''�° �-�-�,;���+ „'^" ""�" "�'
+�,e ,,....,;,,,.r« ,, e,,.,;,.va �.., +,.e ,.;«., .,�e �..,.,.v,. „� �,.o ,...,. ., - „+� ��,nii �.e , oa. The appraisal must be
,. ,. ,...,,,, ,.,
--= - -- -- -� --- --� � ---- --- -- '-'- - � - --- -
from a state certified real estate a�praiser. Changes, alterations, additions or other work is subject to all
applicable requirements of this Code including but not limited to provisions related to critical areas
(FWRC Title 19, Division V), off-street parking (Chapter 19.130 FWRC), improvements (Chapter 19.135
FWRC), and landscaping (Chapter 19.125 FWRC).
Section 13. FWRC 19.30.160(2)(b) is hereby amended to read as follows:
The applicant is making any alterations or changes or doing any work, other than tenant
improvements and the fair market value of the alteration, change or other work, in any one consecutive
12-month period, does not exceed 75 percent of the assessed or appraised value of the improvement. �e
. The appraisal must be from a
state-certified real estate appraiser. 'T`'� ,,.,........�.: ;• a� :��?�Y:::�~: �__ ___� a;
r°a'�• *'�° �;*�, *'�° ,°-��-°� ��*'�° *�°� � �+� �'�^„'�° , °a For purposes of determining value under
� •
this subsection, improvements required pursuant to FWRC 1930.090 (nonconforming development) and/
or 19.30.110 (streetlsidewalk improvements) shall not be counted towards the 75 percent threshold which
would trigger application of this subsection; and
Section 14. FWRC 19:30.200(1) is hereby amended to read as follows:
The cost of reconstructing the damaged improvement does not exceed 75 percent of the assessed
or appraised value of that improvement prior to the damage; except that no cost limit applies to the
reconstruction of damaged improvements in the city center core and frame, and the director may require
minor upgrades to the rebuilt improvements that are intended to achieve a greater level of compliance
with the site and design guidelines in this title; and provided, that the upgrades are reasonably related to
the improvement(s) and proportional to the reconstruction costs. 'r'�° �~~'����+ -�^•� ""^T"''° "" """"";�°'
^�'+'�° ; °°„� •_•'�;�'�'�°�'�°°r a�-��R°a The appraisal must be from a
��} state-certified real estate appraiser. -' n �'�� ae�e�o��-�eetie��eq�e�-�
Ordinance No. 10- Page 7 of 9
. ,
r+� ��,.,n �.e , ea
Section 15. FWRC 19.135.030(1)(a) is hereby amended to read as follows:
The applicant need not comply with the provisions of this chapter if the proposed improvements
in any 12-month period do not exceed 25 percent of the assessed or appraised value (based on an�
appraisal conducted bv a state-certi�ed real estate appraiser provided by the applicant} of all structures
and land combined on the subject property, whichever is greater, except that if the subject property is
equal to or geater than 100,000 square feet in size, the land value shall not be included in the assessed or
appraised value used to determine the 25 percent. If the 25 percent threshold is exceeded, public
improvements will be required under FWRC 19.135.040 to the extent they are commensurate with the
impacts of the development, as determined by the director.
Section 16. Severabilitv. The provisions of this ordinance are declared sepaxate and severable.
The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the
invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circuxnstance, shall not affect the �validity of the
remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to any other persons or circumstances.
Section 17. Corrections. T'he City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to
make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of
scrivener/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references
thereto.
Section 18. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of
this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 19. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five (5) da.ys a$er passage and
publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of
20
Ordinance No. 10- Page 8 of 9
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, LINDA KOCHMAR
I:�1�1��.��
CITY CLERK, CAROL MCNEILLY, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTNE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.:
Ordinance No. 10- Page 9 oJ9
COU�C[L. MEETING DATE '�: -` '`. `�,'-�e' � ��:�� `�
►
ITEVi #: � �
AGEi'�1DA BILL
SIIBJECT Amendments to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 18 "Subdivisions," related to short subdivision
onsite notice of application requirements.
Po[.[CY QUESTtOr: Should the city reduce the requirement for three onsite short subdivision notice of application signs
to one sign?
CITY OF FEDERAL �VAY
CITY COUNCIL
Co�iMtTTEE: Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC)
CATEGORY:
� Consent
❑ City Counci! Business
/1
�
Ordinance
Resolution
MEETING DATE March l , 2009
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
ST�FF_REPORT BY: Matthew Herrera, Associate_Planner DEPT Community Develo mp ent Services _
Exhibits: (1) Planning Commission staff report for the February 17, 2010,'public hearing with Exhibits A-C; (2) Draft
min tes of the February 17, 2010, Planning Commission meeting; an (3) q Draft ad ordinance.
C�') � C��}v� Go un L+ 1 5'�..�,�J� R o�n0 t '� Cv �'�'�+� 'M O[�� ��P� C3�r'w.X k 0.d��� o�. u �✓�E+^�' .�-
Background: Current short subdivision regulations require the city to post three onsite notice of application signs on
property undergoing short plat review. Three onsite notices is often duplicative and unnecessary as many properties in the
city are adjacent to only one public right-of-way ancL`or are relatively narrow in width. The proposed amendment would
require one onsite notice sign with the option to provide additional signs to clearly identify the property if needed.
Options Considered: 1) Adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation as contained in the Draft Adoption Ordinance
(Exhibit 3); 2) Adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation as modified by the LUTC: or 3) Do not adopt the
� ...._.
PLANNING COMM[SS[ON RECOMMENDAT[OiV: Adoption of Option #l.
STAFF RECOM�1IEiYDATION Staff recommends the Council adopt Option #1, adopt the Planning Commission's
recommendation as contained in the Draft Adoption Ordinance
C[TY MANAGER APPROVAL: ,a�./�� o� y (j K,�-�r'�IRECTOR APPROVAL: �� �./Xi�G
Co ttee Councii Committee Council
COMhtITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Forward Optio "• Gt5 rrtOd -f� Cla.ri fz� Cr� tera. {�' app�vpn�-t� s+yn�
iYt the Draft Adoption Ordinance to the full Coun ' on M ch 16, for first reading
� c
� `'�--' \
Dini Duclos. Chair �m Fe ell. Member ac1 ovev, D ember
PROPOSED COUNC[L MOT[ON(S): �,/ IV �'�
1 READ[NG OE ORDiNANCE (3/16J10): "I move to fonvard t{ae ordinance to a second readingfor enactment on the April 6,
2010, consent agenda. "
2� READING OF ORDINANCE (4/6/10) "I move approval of the L UTC's recommendation to approve the code amendments.
which are contained in the Adoption Ordinance. "
(BELOW TD BE CO�i�lPLETED BY CITY CLERR'S OFFICE)
COUNC[L ACTION:
� APPROVED
❑ DENIED
❑ TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION
� NtOVED TO SECOND READ[NG (ordinances only)
REVISED - 02/06J2006
COUNC[L B[LL #
1 reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
��r
, �
K�\2009 Code ArtxndmentsWDU and Appraisal Clazification\LUTC�Short Plat Notice` Plat Re1�i;td.�grnda BiU DOC
�` �:r
� �. -
.
.� � �.�� �_
DATE:
TO:
FRONi:
SUBJECT:
��r����� '
�`��� ����� t 2
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
February 10, 2010
Chair Merle Pfeifer and Members of the City of Federal Way Planning Commission
Greg Fe�vins, Director of Community Development Services
Ntatthew Herrera, Associate Planner
Onsite Public Notice Signs for Short Subdivision Notice of Application
FiLE: � 10-i00308-UP
MEET[vG D�TE: February 17, 2010
A. POLICY QliEST[ON
Should the city reduce the requirement for a tninimum of ihree onsite "Proposed Land Use Action"
signs for short subdivision applications?
B. ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A— Proposed code amendment to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Titie 18,
"Subdivisions," 1830.080
Exhibit B— Email notification to stakeholder list of Planning Commission public hearing
Exhibit C— Email noti fication to stakeholder list of Planning Commission staff report
C. BACKGROUYD & ANALYS[S
The division of land into nine or fewer lots (short subdivision) requires the city to provide public
notice in the Federcrl Way Mirror, pubiic posting on the city's notification boards, and notice board
signs on the property proposing the division. Pursuant to FWRC 18.30.080(2)(b):
"At least three copies of the notice wili be conspicuously posted on or near the subject
property. Of these, at least one will be posted on or adjacent to every public right-of-way
providing primary vehicular access to any property that abuts the subject property."
As many properties in the city are adjacent to only one public right-of-way and/or relatively narrow in
width, staff has found that the requirement to post three notices on properties to be subdivided is
dupticative and an unnecessary use of staff time and resources. As an alternative to a prescriptive
number of signs per short subdivision application, staff finds one notice board, with the option to
provide additional signs if necessary, wouid provide adequate notice of the proposed short subdivision.
Onsite Public Notice Sign� for Short Subdivision Notice of Application Fife #10.100308-UP
Planning Commission Staff R�port Page 1 of 3
������� '
�aa���. 2 �� l2
Staff revie�ved code language in the following four jurisdictions: Des Moines, Kent, Renton, and
Tacoma. �Vith the exception of Tacoma,` all surveyed cities require at least one notice sign to be
piaced on the subject property. The cities of Des Moines and Kent require public notice signs placed
on all right-of-�vay frontages. The City of Des Moines also allows the department director to require
additionai signs at his/her discretion for properties with frontages exceeding �00 linear feet.
Cit Minimum Number of Si ns Code Lan ua e
DMMC 16.04.160 — Number of Signs. One
One per street frontage. public notice sign shall be required per street
Des Moines Additional signs may be frontage. In case of large parcels or street
required. frontages exceeding 500 feet, [directorJ may
re uire the ostin of additional si ns_
KCC t2.04.140 — If the property to be
subdivided is located adjacent to more than
Kent �ne. Addifional signs may be one (1) public street or has more than one (1)
required. potential access route, one (1) public notice
board shall be placed on the property adjacent
to each street or tential access route.
RMC 4-7-070 — A minimum of one notice of
the application for short ptat shall be posted
Renton One on or adjacent to the iand to be subdivided at
least fourteen (14) days prior to the
administrative determination on the short plat
a lication.
As referenced in TCC 13.05_020 Table G.
Tacoma None short plats do not require onsite notice sign
stin .
D. PROCEDURAL SUM1�tARY
'The proposed development regulation is exempt from environmentai review pursuant to State
Environmental Policy Act Rules 197-11-800(19), "Procedural Actions," as the proposal relates solely
to governmental procedures containing no substantive standards respecting use or modification of the
environment.
Public notice of the Planning Commission hearing was published in the Federal Way Mirror and
emailed to the department's stakeholders (Exhibit B) February 3, 2010. This staff report was emailed
to the department's stakeholders on February I0, 20i0 (Exhibit C).
E. BASIS FOR PLANN[NG COMNI[SSiON ACTION
FWRC Title 19, "Zoning and Development," Chapter 19.80, "Process VI Review," establishes a
process and criteria for deveiopment regulation amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the
role of the Planning Commission is as follows:
l. To review and evaivate the proposed development regulation amendments.
2. To determine whether the proposed development regulation amendment meets the
criteria provided by FWRC 19.80.130
� City of Tacoma short subdivision regulations do not require applicants to post Notice of Application signs on the subject property.
Onsite Public Notice Signs for Short Subdivision Notice of Application File #10-100308-UP
Planning Commission StafF Report Page 2 of 3
�������' �
�`��� 3 �� 12.
To forward a recommendation to City Council regarding adoption of the proposed
development regulation amendment
F. DECISIOYAL CRITERIA
FWRC 19.80.130 provides criteria for development regulation amendments. The following section
analyzes the compliance of the proposed amendments with the criteria provided by FWRC i 9.80.130.
The city may amend the text of the FWRC only if it finds that:
1. The proposed amendment is consistent �vith the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan.
Staff Response — The proposed code amendment is consistent with the following land use
chapter policies:
LUP4 — Maximize efficiency of the development review process.
LUP6 — Conduct regular reviews of the development regulations to determine
how to improve upon the permit revietiv process.
2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare.
Staff Response — The proposed code amendment bears a substantial relationship to welfare
as it will remove duplicative land use notice signs on properties within the ciry while still
meeting public notice requirements.
3. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the City.
Staff Response — The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the ciry as it reduces costs
associated with duplicative sign posting.
G. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends amending the short subdivision notice requirements to a minimum of one onsite
notice sign with the ability to require additional signs if appropriate.
H. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIOIY
Consistent with the provisions of FWRC 19.80.240, the Planni�g Commission may take the following
actions regarding the proposed development regulation amendments:
l. Recommend to City Council adoption of the FWRC text amendments as proposed;
2. Modify the proposed FWRC text amendments and recommend to City Council adoption of
the FWRC text amendments as modified;
3. Recommend to City Council that the proposed FWRC text amendments not be adopted; or.
4. Forward the proposed FWRC text amendments to City Council without a recommendation.
K:�'009 Code AmeodmrntsWDU and Appraisal C7arificazionlPtanning Commission�Notice Sign`S�aff Report & Proposed Code IanguageWaice Sign StaftReport.doc
Onsite Public Notice Signs for Short Subdivision Notice of Application File #10-1UO308-UP
Planning Commission Stat�'Report Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT A
Federal Way Revised Coc�e
Title 18, "Subdivisions"
������� 1
���Y�� r� �� ��
18.30.080 Notice.
(1) Content. The director of community development services shatl, within 14 days of issuing a
ietter of completeness on the proposal, prepare a notice of appiication containing the following
information:
(a) The name of the applicant and, if applicable, the project name_ The date of application,
date of the notice of completion for the application and the date of the notice of application.
(b) The street address of the subject property or, if this is not avaiiabie, a locational
description in nonlegal language. Except for notice published in the newspaper of general
circulation in the city, the notice must also include a vicinity map that identiFies the subject
property.
(c) The citation of the provision of this title describing the requested decision and, to the
extent known by the city, any other permits which are not included in the application.
(d) A brief description of the requested decision, a list of the project permits included in the
application, and, if applicable, a list of any studies requested under RCW 36.70A.440.
(e) A statement of the availability of the official file.
(� A statement of the right of any person to submit �vritten comments to the director of
community development services regarding the application within 15 days of the date of the
notice.
(g) A statement that only persons who submit written comments to the director of community
development services, or specifically requests a copy of the original decision, may appeal the
director's decision.
(h) The identification of existing environmental documents that evaluate the proposed project
and the location where the application and any studies can re reviewed.
(i) A statement of the preliminary detennination, if one has been made at the time of notice,
of those development regulations that will be used for project mitigation and of consistency as
provided in RCW 36.70B.040. ,
(2) Distribution. Within 14 days of issuance of the letter of completeness, and at least 14 calendar
days before the deadline for submitting comments, the director of community development
services shall distribute this notice as follows:
(a) A copy of the notice will be published in a newspaper of general circulation of the city.
(b) At least t#�ee-se�es one conv of the notice will be conspicuously posted ^� �� �°�� +"°
,
�g adjacent to the primary vehicular access to the subject property.
Additional signs shall be posted on or near the subiect �roperty, if needed, to clearly identifv the
ro e
(c) A copy of the notice will be posted on each of the official notification boards of the city
and pubtic libraries located within the city.
(Ord. No. 07-554, § 5(Exh. A(2)), 5-15-07. Code 2001 § 20-88.)
K�t'_009 Code Amendmems'.ADU and Appraisal ClarificazionlPlannmg Convnissioa\Nwice Sign`Staff Repon & Proposed Code LanguagelExhibit A Proposed Languagt.�e
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
�������° �1 ''
7ina Piety PA�� s�� 1� '
Wednesday, February 03, 2010 9:03 AM ;
Bili McCaffrey; Bob Cooper; Bob Roper; Brant A_ Schweikl; Brett Thomas; Chad I
Weiser; Chris Carrel; Christine Balyeat; Connie Boyle; Dale A. Roper; Dan Biles; Dan 'i
Coxall; Darla Morin; Dave Matafin; Dave Thorstad; Dennis Haneberg; Don Perry ; '
Gareth Roe; Garrett Huffman; Gary Hering; Gary Martindale; Gil Hulsmann; Hans �I
Korve; Haynes Lund; Heidi Swartz; James Pate;leff Greene; Jeff Oliphant; Jennifer �,
Dovey; Jerry Heinz;lim Jordan;lohn Bowman;lohn Norr+s; 1on Potter;lulie Ramseth; I,
Koong Cho; Kurt Wilson; Mark Clirehugh; Mark Freitas; Mel Easter; Mike Bailey; Mike �
Behn; Mike Hovland; Monte Powell; Paul Lymberis; Paul Manzer; Peter Townsend; �
Randy Lloyd; Rick Olson; Rob Aigner; Rob Rueber; Rod Leland; Ron 8iesotd; Ron
Tremaine; Sam Pace; Scott Rhodes; Sheppard Cutter; Sid White; Steve Hammer; Steve
Kelly; Tim Atkins; Tim Osborne; Todd Suchan; Tom Barghausen; Tom Pierson; Tom
Raymond; Tony Starkovich; Tres Kirkebo
Matt Herrera; Margaret Clark; Greg Fewins; Isaac Conlen; Cary Roe; Ken Miller; Lee
Bailey; William Appleton
Notice of Federal Way Planning Commission
Notice of Public Hearing.doc
Hello Federal Way Stakeholders,
On February 17, 2010, the Federal Way Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on proposed
amendments to the Federal Way Revised Code {FWRC) regarding: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) size
calculation; clarification of appraisal requirements; and short subdivision notice requirements. Please see the
attached notice for specific information. Please address any questions and/or comments to Associate Planner
Matt Herrera at 253-835-2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com.
__ _ _ __
r;,�a.��, �ad��tYax�w��aa�ta,h,trr
Community Development Services
City of Federal Way
Street: 33325 8th Avenue South
Mail: PO Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063
253-835-2601; Fax 253-835-2609
EYHIBIT B
Stakeho(ders List
Updated Februar}� 2010
Bob Cooper
Lloyd Enterprises Inc.
PO Box 3889
Federat Way, WA 98063-3889
bobc�: ilaydenterprisesinc.co�n
Chris Carrel
Friend of the Hylebos
PO Box 2497 t
Federat Way, WA 98093
ccarcel �%?att.hiackbeny.net
Dan Biles
SBI Developing
PO Box 73790
Puyaitup, VVA 98373
C�I1b{fl �soundbuilthomes.com
Kurt Wilson
SB[ Developing
PO Box 73790
Puyallup, WA 98373
(253)539-8116
kurtr �soundbuilthomes.coin
Darla Morin
Harsch Investment Properties
13010 NE 20�' Street, Suite 450
Bellewe, WA 98005
(425)284-5352
darlam(a),harsch.com
Julie Ramseth
Harsch Investment Properties
13010 NE 20�' Street, Suite 450
Bellevue, WA 98005
(530)450-0778
�ul iei• a�harsc3i.com
Don Perry
Lakehaven Utility District
PO Box 4249
Federal Way, WA 98063
dpeny�a?lakehaven.org
Tim Osborne, PE
Lakehaven Utility District
31627 1�` Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253) 946-5540
tosb�rne(a'� iakehaven.or�
John Bowman
Lakehaven Utility District
PO Box 4249
Federal Way, WA 98063
(253) 946-�401
j6otiinianiu;iakeha� en.�
������� �
�A�� � ��_��
Paul Manzer
Pacland Development Consu(ting
11235 SE 6'� Street, Suite 220
Bellevue, WA 98004
(425)4�3-9501
pmanzer��acland.c�m
Gil Hulsmann
Abbey Road Group Rod Leland
PO Box 1224 Federal Way Public Schools
Puyallup, WA 98371 31405 18`� Avenue South
(253) 435-3699 Federal Way, WA 98003
�il.hulsmann�«abt�evroacl� rieland(a�fivsd.wednet.edu
Jennifer povey
Windermere
33405 6`� Avenue South
Federal VVay, WA 98003
(206)423-8000
j sdo vey��U ��� i nd� rmc re . c o m
John Norris
Norris Homes
2053 Faben Drive
Mercer Island, �VA 98040
(206)275-i901
jol�nnonis(a>coi��cast. itet
Steve Kelly
ESM Consultin� Engineers
3391� i Way South, Suite 200
Federal Way, WA 98003
{253)838-6113
Steve.keil �i�esmci��i l.com
Mark Clirehugh
GVA Kidder, Mathews, Segner
1201 Pacific Avenue, # 1400
Tacoma, WA 98402
(253j722-1416
marckc (cu�vak�t i. co m
Paul Lymberis
Quadrant Homes
PO Box 130
Bellewe, WA 98009
(425) 452-6556
Paul.iti�mberis:'v�qi�adra�ltl�omcs.com
Sid White
Federal Way Public Schools
1066 South 320`� Street
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)945-5935
swhite(a?fiips.org
Ron Biesold
South King Fire & Rescue
31617 1 Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(206) 227-930 t
Ron. biesoldnsouthkin�fire.or�
Tom Raymond
South King Fire & Rescue
31617 1 Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)946-?241
Tom.raymond��souttikina fire.or ;
Tom Pierson
Federal Way Chamber of Commerce
PO Box 4220
Federal Way, WA 98063
(253)838-2605
tomp��federalwa� hatt�ber.com
Sam Pace
Sea/King County Assoc of Realtors
29839 154�' Avenue SE
Kent, WA 98042-4557
(253)630-5541
sampace(ir�,cance nt ric. ne t
K Code Amendme�ns�ADU ard Appraisa! ClarificationlPlam�ing Commission�Notice Sign\StafT Repon & Proposed Code LanguagelFaehbit B Siakeholders [.ia.doc Page 1 of 3
Ron Tremaine
Redstone Development
Land Acquisition and Development
17417 433`� Street SE
North Bend, �VA 98045
reclstoneron:fi lio*mail.com
425-831-7730 (wk)
206-353-1761 (celi)
425-831-7783 (fax)
Monte Poweli
Powell Homes
29607 8`� Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98403
montefa?pc� wel I-hoi��es. com.
Ganett J. Huffman
Master Builders Association
of King/Snohomish Counties
33� 116�' A��enue SE
Bellewe, WA 98004
gliuf( ma n�ui mbak�. cocn
425-460-8236 (MBAKS)
Brant A. Schweikl, P.E.
Managing Member
Schweiki and Associates, PLLC
705 South 9`� Street, Suite 303
Tacoma, WA 98405
bschL�•eikl�lsacivil.net
2�3-272-4451 (wk)
253-272-�1495(falc)
Mike Behn
Quadrant, Deveiopment Manager
14725 SE 36�' Street, Suite #200
PO Box 130
Bellewe, WA 98009
mi kc.behii(�v��uacl ranthomes.com
425-452-6�63
42�-753-4866(cell)
Hans Korve
726 Auburn Way North
Auburn, WA 98032
hanst�c%dm -ii 1c.uS
253-383-2200
Bob Roper
bob. roper;�co�ticast. Y�et
253-941-6954
Dale A Roper
The Roper Company
t,andscape Architecture/Site Planning
816 Cherry Avenue, #3A
������� i
Sumner, WA 98390 Mark Fre����=�'���
253-891-1030 33516 9�' Aveuue South
253-826-3891 (fax) Federal Way, WA 95003
roperclalei�i aot.com 2�3-838-8327
;narkfccim(a;cs.com
Gary Hering
1439 SW 296`" Street
Federal Way, WA 98023
gjherin�(a?con�cast. iiet
Tim Atkins
Big Mountain Enterprises
tim�bigmou;itain� nt.eorn
PO Box 1001
Enumclaw, WA 98022
Biil McCaffrey
WJM Studio
1911 SW Campus Drive, Suite ( t6
Federal Way, WA 98023
��j mccaffrev�a?co�ncas t. net
Tom Barghausen
Barghausen Consulting Engineers
18215 72 Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
tbarehausen(ci�baretiai�se n. com
Peter Townsend
1648 South 310�' Street, Suite 6
Federal Way, WA 98003
253-839-2947
etp ertg(a%.me.com
Auburn, WA 98032
Mike Baily
LDG Architects
1319 Dexter Avenue, Suite 260
Seattle, WA 98109
206-283-4764
cnike(cL ldgarchitects.com
Tres Kirkebo
Apex En�ineering
2601 35 Street, Suite 200
Tacoma, WA 98409
2�3-473-4494
� i rkebo(n �apexengi nee ri ne.net
Dennis Haneberg
Apex Engineering
2601 35` Street, Suite 200
Tacoma, WA 98409
253-473-4494
hanberg cr.apexen ing eering.net
Gary Martindale
The Commons of Federal Way
1928-B South Commons Blvd
Federal Way, WA 98003
253-839-6156
gmartindate� tcaf�c•.co rn
Jeff Greene
Greene Gasaway Architects
PO Box 4158
Federal Way, WA 98063-4158
253-941-4937
jeffggarch� seanet.co�n
Steve Hammer
Browleit Peterson Hammer
Architects
6920 220�' SW, Suite 200
Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043
steve�bpharch.con�
Chad Weiser
OTAK
10236 NE Points Drive, Suite 400
Kirkland, WA 98033-7897
206-442-1359
chad. weiserfa?otalccorri
Christine Balyeat
New Concept Homes
PO Box 1229
Issaquah, WA 98027
hcbalyeat�,�h�tmaiL c�m
Mel Easter
Johnson Braund Design Group
15200 52 Avenue South, Suite 200
Seattte, WA 98188
206-766-8300
meleCjbdg.com
Koong Cho
Royal Hospitality
(Hampton Inn)
15901 West Valley Highway
Tukwila, WA 98188
253-318-0908
i:oon�c�i?comcast. net
K�`�009 C�de Amendmems4lDU and Appraisal Clarification\Planning Commissan\Naice SignlStafF Report & Proposed Code fangaage�Exhibit B Seakeholders List.doc Page 2 of 3
Jim Jordan
(Saghalie Hei�his deve[oper)
jrj�rcian«i- iso i}ieciia_�o►i�
Mike Hovland
Hovland Architects
900 Meridian Avenue East, Ste 408
Milton, WA 98354
hovarc ht(ci'cumca,t. �tet
Dave Thorstad
406 South 289�' Place
Federal Way, WA 98003
ditarchitzc tra°comcast. ziet
Dan Coxall
Hammes Co.
(St. Francis Hospital)
1325 4�' Avenue, Suite iO3�
Seattle, WA 98101
dcoxall(a�hamme sco. com
Tony Starkovich
t 611 9�' Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 93020
425-775-6552
vinta�ecapitat� hatn�aiLcom
Brett Thomas breiTta�
Connie Boyle connie.bovle(aicoiliers.com
James Pate 'afl ziespra;harsch.cvm
JeffOliphant �Lo�Sa;�aol.com
Jerry Heinz jeerv.heinz�uu�weverhaeuser.com
Jon Potter ,���otter936(c�ao3.cum
Randy Lloyd ran<ivl]ovd�i?sprint.black.berry.net
Rick Olson Rici:(7ison(ii�fhsheaith.or�
Rob Aigner roba'u�l�arsd�.cotn
Rob Rueber an
Scott Rhodes rhodesarchitect��re(?,gmail.com
Sheppard Cutler swc4�i�fishersons.com
Todd Suchan tsuchan!a:;wildwaves.com
Gordon Olson Gordan.olsonta�southlcingfire.org
������� �-
��� -��' I Z�
BCRA
2106 Pacific Avenue, Suite 300
Tacoma, �VA 98402
2i3-627-4367
�=rc>�:"ri bcraciesi i�.� com
Heidi Swartz
Swartz Deve(opment
�72� 30�' Avenue NE
Seatt(e, WA 98105
(206) 730-b933 cell
(206) 527-8999 fax
hpsu-artz �comcast.net
K:�2009 Code AmendmemsWDU and Appraisal Clarifxation\Phrming Commission�fiotice Sign�Staff Repat & Piaposed Code languagelExhibit 8 S�akeholders List.doc Page 3 of 3
�������` �
From: Tina Piety ��j�� G� ��) �
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:40 PM �� �
To: Bill McCaffrey; Bob Cooper; Bob Roper; Brant A. Schweikl; Brett Thomas; Chad
Weiser; Chris Carrel; Christine Balyeat; Connie Boy1e; Dale A. Roper; Dan Biles; Dan
Coxall; Darla Morin; Dave Matafin; Dave Thorstad; Dennis Haneberg; Don Perry ;
Gareth Roe; Garrett Huffman; Gary Hering; Gary Martindale; Gil Hulsmann; Hans
Koroe; Haynes Lund; Heidi Swartz; James Pate; Jeff Greene; Jeff Oliphant; Jennifer
Dovey;lerry Heinz;lim Jordan; John Bowman; John Norris; Jon Potter; Julie Ramseth;
Koong Cho; Kurt Wilson; Mark Clirehugh; Mark Freitas; Mel Easter; Mike Bailey; Mike
Behn; Mike Hovland; Monte Powell; Paul Lymberis; Paul Manzer; Peter Townsend;
Randy Lloyd; Rick Olson; Rob Aigner; Rob Rueber; Rod Leland; Ron Biesold; Ron
Tremaine; Sam Pace; Scott Rhodes; Sheppard Cutler; Sid White; Steve Hammer; Steve
Keily; Tim Atkins; Tim Osborne; Todd Suchan; Tom Barghausen; Tom Pierson; Tom
Raymond; Tony Starkovich; Tres Kirkebo
Cc: Matt Herrera; Margaret Clark; Greg Fewins; Isaac Conlen; Lee Bailey; Cary Roe; Ken
Miller; Marwan Salloum; WilliamAppleton
Subject: Federal Way Planning Commission
Attachments: Exhibit D Stakeholders List.doc; ADU Staff Report.doc; Exhibit A Revised SE
Chart.doc; Exhibit 6 Revised RS Chart.doc; Exhibit C Stakeholders List.doc; Exhibit F
Stakeholders List.doc; Appraisal Staff Report.doc; Exhibit A Surface Water
Management 16.15.010.doc; Exhibit B Subdivisions 18.55.060.doc; Exhibit C Chapter
19.30 Nonconformace.doc; Exhibit D Development Improvements 19.135.030.doc;
Exhibit E Stakeholders List.doc; Notice Sign Staff Report.doc; Exhibit A Proposed
Language.doc; Exhibit B Stakeholders List.doc; Exhibit C Stakeholders List.doc
HeUo Federal Way Stakeholders,
On February 17tfi, the Federal Way Planning Commission will be holding public hearings on proposed
amendments to the Federal Way Revised Code (fWRC) regarding: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) size
calculation; clarification of appraisal requirements; and changes to short subdivision notice requirements.
Attached you wiil find the Planning Commission agenda and staff reports and exhibits for the proposed
amendments. !f you have any questions, please contact Associate Planner Matt Herrera at 253-835-2638, or
matt herrera�?cityoffederaiway_com.
Ti,s��a. �i,ety, �1 d;vn.i,v�.e.�"ra�'wPi�l�;�i%t+wvi�" II
Community Development Services
City of Federa) Way
Street: 33325 8th Avenue South
Mail: PO Box 9718
Federa! Way, WA 98063
253-835-2601; Fax 253-835-2609
EXHIBIT C
Stakeholders List
Updated February 2010
Bob Cooper
Lloyd Enterprises Inc_
PO Box 3889
Federal Way, WA 93063-3389
bobe(a111ovdenteipri�esinc.com
Chris Cartel
Friend of the Hylebos
PO Box 24971
Federal Way, WA 9$093
ccarre!(ii;att.blackberry. net
Dan Biles
SBI Developing
PO Box 73790
Puyallup, WA 98373
danb �i�soundt�uilt}lgmes,cc�m
Kurt Wilson
SBI Developing
PO Box 73790
Puyaltup, WA 98373
(253)539-8116
kurt r�so a ndb u i I th o�n e s. c o n�
Darta Morin
Harsch Investment Properties
13010 NE 20`�' Street, Suite 4�0
Bellevue, WA 98005
(425)284-5352
darlacn(�'harsch. com
Julie Ramseth
Harsch Investment Properties
13010 NE 20`� Street, Suite 4�0
Believue, WA 9800�
(530)450-0778
julier ii?harsch.con�
Don Perry
Lakehaven Utility District
PO Box a249
Federai Way, WA 98063
�erry�ir?Lakehaven.org
Tim Osborne, PE
Lakehaven Utility District
31627 1 u Avenue South
Federai Way, WA 98003
(253) 946-5540
tosbotne c .lakehaven.or�
John Bowman
Lakehaven Utility Disttict
PO Box 4249
Federal Way, WA 98063
(253)946-5401
jbo�vman ,lakeha��en.or�
E�C����7' ( ,
������� ��
Paul Manzer
Pacland Development Consulting
1123� SE 6�' Street, Suite 220
Bellewe, WA 98004
(425)453-9501
pmanzerfcvpadand.cam
Gil Hulsmann
Abbey Road Group Rod Leland
PO Box 1224 Federal Way Publie Schools
Puyaltup, WA 98371 31405 i8`� Avenue South
(253) 435-3699 Federal Way, WA 98003
;il.hulsmanncabbeyroad��aup.com rlelanc�,�vfwsd.wednet.edu
Jennifer povey
W indermere
33405 6`� Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(206)423-8000
j sciovey(rr����inciermere. cc�m
John Norris
Norris Homes
2053 Faben Drive
Mercer Island, WA 98040
(206)275-1901
j otumorrisr'coincast. net
Steve Kelly
ESM Consulting Engineers
33915 1 Way South, Suite 200
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)838-6113
Stez e.ke}ty�iUesmcivil.com
Mark Clirehugh
GVA Kidder, Mathews, Segner
1201 Pacific Avenue, #1400
Tacoma, WA 98402
(253)722-1416
marckciru�nrakm.c�m
Paul Lymberis
Quadrant Homes
PO Box 130
Bellewe, WA 98009
(425)452-6556
Paut. tvmberis{iLquadra�itlic�mes.com
Sid White
Federal Way Public Schools
1066 South 320`� Sireet
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)945-5935
s�vlfite�u), f�vps.orE
Ron Biesold
South King Fire & Rescue
31617 1 Avenue South
Federai Way, WA 98003
(206)227-930t
Ron.b iesoldnsouthlcingf�re.org
Tom Raymond
South King Fire & Rescue
3 t 617 1 Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)946-7241
�'onl. ravmond(a�southl:inafire.ora
Tom Pierson
Federal Way Chamber of Commerce
PO Box 4220
Federat Way, WA 98063
(253)838-2605
tomp�ci�federalwaychamber.com
Sam Pace
Sea/King County Assoc of Realtors
29839 154` Avenue SE
Kent, WA 98042-455?
(253)630-5541
sar�ace!ci:cnncentric. net
K-13009 Code Ame�mentsiApU and Appraisal�Clm�ification:Planning Commission�Naice SignlStaff Report & Propcued Code Language\Exh'bi� C StalcehoWus List.Mc Page i of 3
Ron Tremaine
Redstone Development
Land Acquisitiou and Development
17417 433 Street SE
North Bend, WA 9804�
reclstoneron�a�hotma i I.com
425-831-7730 (wk)
206-353-1761 (cell)
425-831-7783 (fax)
Monte Powell
Powell Hocnes
29607 8'� Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
nionte anp, owell-hontes.coi»
Garrett J. Huffman
Master Builders Association
of King/Snohomish Counties
335 1 l6'� Avenue SE
Bellevue, WA 98004
g,huffman�?mbalcs.com
425-460-8236 (MBAKS)
Brant A. Schweikl, P.E.
Managing Member
Schweikl and Associates, PLLC
705 South 9"' Street, Suite 303
Taco�, WA 98405
bs chcve ikl�s ac i v il. n e t
253-272-4451 (wk)
253-272-4495(fax)
Mike Behn
Quadrant, Development Manager
14725 SE 36�' Street, Suite #200
PO Box 130
Bellevue, WA 98009
mike.behn�cvquadrantho m::s.co�zi
425-452-6563
425-753-4866(cell)
Hans Korve
726 Auburn Way North
Aubum, WA 98032
hans(u�dmp-inc.us
253-383-2200
Bob Roper
bob.roperfa?,comcast. nzt
253-94i-6954
Dale A Roper
The Roper Company
Landscape Architecture/Site Planning
816 Cherry Avenue, #3A
������� �
Sumner, WA 98390 ��tark F���� �, ��, 1�
2�3-891-1030 .i3� t6 9 Av �tth-- �
2�3-426- �891 (fax) Federal Way, ���A 98003
�_c���erdale�'�i�aol.com 2�3-$38-S327
tr�arl:tcc i►n, �;cs. �om
Gary Hering
1439 SW 296`� Street
Federal Way, �VA 98023
aj lierina;a�comcast.��et
Tim Atkins
Big Mountain Enterprises
ticnfa?bit;mountainent.com
PO Box 1001
Enumclaw, WA 98022
Bill McCaffrey
WJM Studio
1911 SW Campus Drive, Suite 116
Federal Way, WA 98023
�i7 niccaffrevSa?comcast.net
Tom Barghausen
Barghausen Consulting Engineers
i 8215 72" Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
tbar�hausentg>.barQhausen.com
Peter Townsend
1b48 South 310`� Street, Suite b
Federal Way, WA 98003
2�3-839-2947
�etert$,�i?nie.com
Auburn, WA 98032
Mike Baiiy
LDG Architects
1319 Dexter Avenue, Suite 260
Seattle, WA 98109
206-283-4764
nuke(u id�architects.com
Tres Kirkebo
Apes EnRineering
2601 3�� Street, Suite 200
Tacoma, �VA 98409
2�3-=t73-=�494
l: i rkebc3;ii�ane �ent? i neerin �. net
Dennis Haneberg
Apex Enjineering
260i 3�`� Street, Suite 200
Tacoma, WA 98409
2�3-473-449�
hanbergic%apexei� Tineering.net
Gary Martindale
The Commons of Eederal Way
1928-B South Commons Blvd
Federal Way, WA 98003
253-839-6156
�martindate �rc�tca fw.com
Jeff Greene
Greene Gasa�vay Architects
PO Box 41�8
Federal �Vay, WA 98063-4158
2�3-941-4937
jeff��;arch �%seanet.com
Steve Hammer
Browleit Peterson Hammer
Architects
6920 220�' SW, Suite 200
Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043
steve(ii'bpha i-ch.cnm
Chad Weiser
OTAK
10236 NE Points Drive, Suite 400
Kirkland, WA 98033-7897
206-442-1359
ctiad. weiserfa)otak.com
Christine Balyeat
New Concept Homes
PO Box 1229
Issaquah, WA 98027
hcbaty�eat�a.ihottnail.com
Mel Easter
Johnson Braund Design Group
15200 �2 Avenue South, Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98188
206-76b-8300
mele!��ibdr.corn
Koong Cho
Royal Hospitality
(Hampton Inn)
15901 West Valley Highway
Tukwila, WA 98188
253
koon�� (rt�coi�icast.net
K:�2009 Code Arttendments�ADU and Appraisal ClarificatanlPlanning Cortrtmssion\Noixe Sign�Staft Report & Proposed Code Language\Exhbh C Stakelalders List dcx Page 2 of 3
Jim Jordan
(Saghalie Heights developer)
j i j ardan(�c? iso niedi a. c o tli
Mike Hovland
Hovland Architects
900 Meridian Avenue East, Ste 408
Milton, WA 983�4
hovarcht(iijcaizcast. r3et
Dave Thorstad
406 South 289�` Place
Federal Way, WA 98003
ditarcliitect�acomcas t. i�et
Dan Coxall
Hammes Co_
(St. Francis Hospital)
1325 4` Avenue, Suite 1035
Seattle, WA 98101
dcaxall;a;ha nlniesco.com
Tony Starkovich
t 611 9` Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
425-775-65�2
v i tzta�ecapital(�itiiotmail.com
Brett Thomas brettt�r:;mountainconst.co��i
Connie Boyle connie.bovle���colliers.com
James Pate jamesp{ir;=harsch.com
JeffOliphant jlo5�r"a'�aol.com
Jerry Heinz jerrv.heinz(ci«•eyerl�aeuser.cam
Jon Potter i�otter936 cLaol.coai
Randy Lloyd randvilc�vci(a?Yprint.blackben-v.net
Rick Olson RickOLsan(«:fhshea(th.or�
Rob Aigner roba,a;l�arscl�.cam
Rob Rueber an
Scott Rhodes rhociesarchitect�ire;c`i�gmail.com
Sheppard Cutler s�vc�cUtisiiersons.com
Todd Suchan #suchanta:•u�ildcvaves.corn
Gordon Olson Gordon.olsonra�southkin��tire.or:.*
G������ �
Garett ���- - � 2' ....�1�'� � Z-
BC2A
2106 Pacific A��enue, Suite 300
Tacoma, �VA 98=t02
253-627-4367
groe(a�bcra<ies i�x n. cn m
Heidi Swactz
Swartz Deveiopment
5724 30�' Avenue NE
Seattle, �VA 9810�
(206) 730-6933 ce�l
(206) 527-8999 fax
hnswartz� �comcast.net
K'•2W9 Code Ancndmems�ADU arni Appraisal f Iarification�Planning Conanission`.Notice SignStaff Repon & Proposed Cade Language�Enhibit C Stalcdioldus List.doc Page 3 of 3
CITY" OF FEDERAL W.aY
PLAi�INI�1G CONIMISSION
February 17, 2010 Cit}• Hall
7:00 p.m. Co unci l C hambers
�tEET'ING l�IINUTES
Commissioners present: Merle Pfeifer, E-Iope Elder, Sarady Long, Lawson Bronson, Wayne Carlson, Tom
Medhurst, and Tim O'Meil. Commissioners absent: none. Staff present: Planning Manager Isaac Conlen,
Senior Planner Margaret Clark, Assistant City Attorney Peter Beck�vith, and Administrative Assistant Tina
Chair Pfeifer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of January 20, 2010, were approved as �vritten.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
Commissionner Carlson commented that tc��o Federal Way residents won Silver and Bronze metals this last
weekend at the Olympic Games. He feels the city should consider aclrnowledging their achievement. Mr.
Conlen replied that Mayor Kochmar had noted the same at last night's City Council meeting and stated
that some sort of recognition and or ceremony will be planned.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Mr. Conlen noted that Associate Planner Matt Herrera, who was scheduled to deliver tonight's staff reports
is out sick. Mr. Conlen and Ms. Clark will be delivering the staff reports. As an FYI to the Commission,
Mr. Conlen reported that the 23 AV enue Condos/Skyway Hotei (a mixed-use project with residential,
hotel, of#`ice, and retail) is in the preapplication phase. They are planning two towers, one approximately
400 feet in height and the second approximateiy 200 feet in height.
COMMiSSION BUS[NESS
PUB[,[C HEAiuNG — Accessory Dwetling Unit Size Calculations
Mr. Conlen delivered the staff report. The proposed code acnendments will clarify what portions of the
structure should be included in the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) size calculation; remove the L5,000
square foot lot size threshold for detached ADUs� and make housekeeping amendments to ADU use zone
charts. Current FWRC regulations do not clearly define what areas are included in the ADU size
calculation. The proposed amendment �vould specifically exclude garages, workshops, and similar non-
living areas from the ADU size calculation. Removal of the 15,000 square foot lot size threshoid would
allow detached ADUs on ali lots.
Same Pace, Seattle/King Coa�nty Association of Realtors — He commented that the association
supports the proposed amendments. 1) They support the removal of the 15,000 square foot
threshold because it is inconsistent with the lots available in Federal Way. 2) The prescriptive
provisions are dysfunctional. 3) The proposed amendments pass the common sense test. 4) The
proposed amendments retain protections that ADUs will be smaller in size than the principal
C:1DocumentsandSettmgslmazthiLocaiSatings�TempuiarylntemetFila`.Coment.OwboktLLX2CP8V�MmiogSuirarery0?-i7-IO.doc �FR��l�¢��� �
PA�� t ���____
P(anning Commission Minutes Page 2 February 17, 2010
building.
Commissioner O'Neil asked if there can be a breezeway to a detached ADU, or would that be considered
an attached ADU. Mr. Conlen replied that as long as it is a non-structural, non-supporting breezeway, the
ADU would be considered detached_ It is possible the building could be so close together that the city
would consider the ADU to be attached.
Commissioner O'Neil asked if the ADU could be rented_ Could an owner build an ADU for the sole purpose
of renting it out as a financial venture? Mr. Conien replied that an owner couid build an ADU for the sole
purpose of renting it out as a fmancial venture. The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) dces require the
owner to live on the properiy, either in the principal residence or the ADU. Commissioner Long asked how
this can be enforced. Mr. Beckwith replied that most enforcement in the city is compliant based, meaning
that if someone complains about who is living in an ADU, the city will research the issue. Mr. Conlen
commented that the owner is required to sign a docunlent that runs with the land stating the owner will dwell
on the property.
Commissioner O'Neil asked for a clarification of what is meant by average building elevation the height of
the structure and grade. Mr. Conlen explained the terms. I-Ie also stated that an ADU cannot exceed the
height of the principal structure.
Commissioner Long asked how may ADUs has the city approved. Ms. Ciark replied that the city had a lot
of existing ADUs when we incorporated. The city �vorked with the owners to bring them into compliance.
Since the city incorporated there have been only approximately 5 new ADUs, bringing the total of new and
existing to 25 to 30 ADUs. Commissioner Long commented that since it is likely that more than one car
will be parked on a lot, does the city anricipate any parking issues? Mr. Conlen replied that typica(ly there
is adequate room for parking.
Commissioner Carlson moved (and it was seconde� to recommended adoption of the staffls
recommendation for the proposed amendments for the Accessory Dwelling Unit Size Calculation. The
motion carried unanimously. The public hearing was closed,
PUB[,IC HEARING — Clarifcallon of Appraisal Requirements
Ms. Clark delivered fihe staff report. 'The intent of the proposed amendments is to clarify and make
consistent who is authorized to conduct an appraisal_ There are ten sections of the FWRC that require an
appraisal. Of those, two require an MAI appraisal, which is a professional accreditation by the Appraisal
Insritute, a private association of real estate appraisers. The remaining eight require an appraisal that is,
"acceptable to the city." In addition, the city may require a second appraisal if the valuation of the first is
considered inappropriate. Staff proposes that the language be changed to require the appraisal be
performed by a state certified appraiser. Language allowing the city to request a second appraisal will be
removed.
Same Pace Seattle/King County Association of Realtors — He commented that the association
supports the proposed amendments. 1) "They are pleased the proposed amendments remove
inconsistencies. 2) They are pleased the proposed amendments leave in the choice of an
assessment or appraisal. 3) The proposed amendments ensure the appraiser meets the highest legal
standard. 4) The proposed amendments minimize the potential for a second appraisal. 5) The
proposed amendments are e�cient and reduce costs.
Commissioner Long asked with the requirement of a state certi fied appraiser, is it likely the owner would
C�\DocumrntsandSettings\�tt6lLocalSettings\TtatyoraryiMernetfi7a\Contrnt.0utlook`,LL�'Ct3V��..Meetmg�5urtmwy02-17-10.doc ������� 2.
RA�'x�.��� `' !
Planning Co�tu�nssion ��tinutes Pa�e 3 February 17, 2010
.vant to use an appraiser certified by another state. Ms. Clark replied the city would require a Washinb on
state appraiser.
Sanze Pace. Seattle/King Counry Association of Recrltors — He commented that the state requires
that the state certified appraiser be geo-competent, which would be unlikely with an out-of-state
appraiser.
Commissioner i�Iedhurst why is the city giving the choice of an assessed value or an appraisal, why not
just the assessed value? Ms. Clark replied that city wants to be flexible and give applicants a choice. She
noted that the proposed amendments do not address the issue if a choice shouid be available, but simply
clarify who is authorized to conduct an appraisal.
Commissioner Bronson expressed concern that the city may question the appraised value; specifically, that
a staff inember without appraisal experience may question an zxperience appraiser. Ms. Clark replied that
staff would only question an appraisal that was unreasonable and would have to have a reason to question
the appraisal. If a question arose, a state certified appraiser would be hired to perform the second appraisal.
Same Pace, Seattle/King County Association ojRealtors — He commented that an assessment is
done once a year (with an appea( period). If the economy changes, by the time the owner applies to
the city, the value may have changed. In such a case, an owner may be better off submiiting an
appraised value as opposed to the assessed value.
Commissioner Bronson moved to recommended adoption of the staffs recommendation for the proposed
amendments to Clarify the Appraisal Requirements. The motion carried unanimously. The public hearing
was closed.
PUBLIC HEARI(vG — Short Subdivision Notice Requirements
Ms. Clark delivered the staff report. Current FWRC regulations require the posting of three onsite notice
boards on or near the subject property. The proposed amendment �ti•ould reduce the requirement to one
onsite board, with the ability to post additional boards if needed. Three onsite notice boards are not
necessary as many properties only abut one right-of-way. The proposed amendment would reduce costs
associated with providing notice boards and staff time to post boards_ The proposed amended language
would require additional notice boards to be posted if staff finds that they are needed to cleariy identify the
property.
Same Pace, Seattle/King County Association of Realtors — He commented that the association
supports the proposed amendments. 1) A short subdivision may be a division into only two lots
and the requirement for three notices boards is excessive in such instances. 2) The proposed
amendment fits smal(er lots, of which there are many in Federal Way. 3) The "if needed"
language referring to additional notice boards is ambiguous, but the Association is wi�ling to wait
to see how it works. 4) The notice board is not the only notice given.
Commissioner Carlson commented that he supports the proposed amendment and that the only downside
he sees is the city may receive compiaints that one notice board is not adequate notice. Commissioner
O'Neil asked what happens if a notice board is defaced. Ms. Clark responded that if the city is told, the
board would be replaced.
Commissioner O'Neil moved to recommended adoption of the staff's recommendation for the proposed
amendments to Short Subdivision Notice Requirements. The m�tion carried unanimously. The public
C�`.DocumentsandSatingsvnatth\l.oca�Settvigs:TempormylntemetEilesiContentOutlooA�LiX'CPSV'�\1eetingSwimvlry0'_-17-IO.doc ������� �
..�� 3 �� y
���'��. .�._. _
Plannin� Comnussion vtinutes Page 4 February 17, 2010
hearing was closed.
ADDIT[ONAL BUS[NESS "
Staff anticipates there will be no meetings in March.
go before the City Council on March 16
The 2010 Planning Commission Work Program will
AUDIENCE COMMENT
Same Pace, Seattle/King County Association of Realtors — He commented that the city has a good list of
stakeholders.
ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
C�\DocumentsandSeumes�mat�MLocalSetteigs\TemporarylmemetFles\Content.0utbok\LLXZCFSV1MeetingSumrery02-i7-IO.doc ������� � ...
PAGE `� Q� Y ._
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINAIYCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to short
subdivision notice requirements; amending FWRC 18.30.480. (Amending
Ordinance No. 07-554.)
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the need to periodically modify Title 18 "Subdivisions," of
the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) in order to conform to state and federal law; codify
administrative practices; clarify and update subdivision regulations as deemed necessary; and
improve the efficiency of the regulations and the development review process; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance, containing amendments to development regulations and the text
of Title 18 FWRC, has co►nplied with Process VI review, chapter 19.80 FWRC, pursuant to
chapter 19.35 FWRC; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the City Council to adopt a new amendment for the
FWRC which establishes development regulations that reduces the number of onsite short
subdivision public notices from tliree to one onsite notices within the City of Federal Way; and
WHEREAS, an Environmental Threshold Determination was not necessary as the
amendment is related solely to governmental procedures and therefore, categorically exempt
from the State Environmental Policy Act; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission properly conducted a duly noticed public hearing on
these code amendments on February 17, 2010, and forwarded a recommendation of approval;
and
WHEREAS, the Land Use/Transportation Committee of the Federai Way City Council
considered these code amendments on March 1, 2010, and recommended adoption of the text
amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission;
Ordinance No. 10- Page / of 4
Rev /10 tU �
��Flw l���
FAG�._ �____��"-�--
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF T�IE CITY OF FEDER:�L WAY,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIi�i AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findin�s_ The City Council of the City of Federal Way makes the follo�ving
findings with respect to the proposed amendment.
{a) This code amendrnent is in the best interest of the residents of the City and will
benefit the City as a whole by reducing duplicative notice posting and unnecessary use of staff
time and resources.
(b) This code amendment complies with Chapter 36.70A RCW, Growth Management.
(c) This code amendment is consistent with the intent and purpose of Title 19 FWRC and
will implement and is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan.
(d) This code amendment bears a substantial relationship to, and will protect and not
adversely affect, the public health, safety, and welfare.
(e) This code amendment has followed the proper procedure required under the FWRC.
Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to ehapter 19.80 FWRC and chapter 1935 FWRC, and
based upon the recitals and the findings set forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council
makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the
adoption of the proposed amendments:
(a) The proposed FWRC amendment is consistent wiih, and substantially implements the
following Federal Way Comprehensive Plan goals and policies:
LUP4 — Maximize efficiency of the development review process.
Ordinanee No. 10- Page 1 oJ 4
Rev I/10 [.0
E�1����� 3
FA�E z ���
LUP6 — Conduct reg�ilar reviews of the development regulations to determine ho�v
to improve upon the permit review process.
(b) The proposed FWRC amendment bears a substantial relationship to the pubiic health,
safety, and welfare because it will remove duplicative land use notice signs on properties within
the city, while still meeting public notice requirements.
(c) The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the public and the residents of the
City of Federal Way because reduces costs associated with duplicative sign posting.
Section 3. FWRC 1830.080(2)(b) is hereby amended to read as follows:
At least ��� one copy of the notice will be conspicuously posted ^� �� �°�� *"°
�
�g adjacent to the primary vehicular access to the subject
property. Additional signs shall be posted on or near the sub�ect propertv, if needed, to clearly
identifv the propertY
Section 4. Severabilitv. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable.
The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this
ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not
affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to any other
persons or circumstances.
Section 5. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to
make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not lirnited to, the correction of
scrivener/cierical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any
references thereto.
Section 6. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date
of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Ordinance No. /0- Page 3 of 4
Rev I/10 LU
E�C�l��1�' 3
R�►�� 3 �� y
Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five (�) days after passage and
publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of
20 .
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, LINDA KOCHMAR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, CAROL MCNEILLY, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.:
K:12009 Code AmendmentsWDU and Appraisal Clarification\LUTC`Short Plat Notice'Short Plat Notice Dratt Ordinance.doc
Ordinance No. lfl-
Page 4 of 4
Rev I'10 LU
�!'i►���� ■ ..��
PA�� � �� `
CITY OF
Federal W�y
STAFF REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
DATE March 5, 2410
To: Mayor Linda Kochmar and City Council Members
VIA: Brian Wilson, Interim City Manager
FRO1v�: Greg Fewins, Director of Community D velopment Servic��
Matthew Herrera, Associate Plann�
SUBJECT Land Use/Transportation Committee (LL1TC) modification of Planning
Commission's recommendation regarding short subdivision onsite notice of
application.
MEETING DATE March 16 , 2010
A. POLICY QUESTION
Should the City reduce the requirement for three onsite short subdivision notice of application signs
to one sign?
$. BACKGROUND
The Land iJse/Transportation Committee (LUTC) considered the above policy question on Monday,
March 1, 2010. Following consideration of the Planning Commission recommendation, the
committee directed staff to modify the recommendation in order to clarify criteria for appropriate
signage. With direction provided by the LUTC, staffpresents the following modification of the
Planning Commission recommendation.
C. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
At least *�� one copv of the notice will be conspicuously posted ^-� ^� �°��'�° �„�;°^*
,
adjacent to the primary vehicular access to A�•� H- +�^+ ^'"_+° the subject property. Additional
si�s shall be posted on or near the sub�ect �ropertv if neecled to clearly identifv the uropertv.
D. LAND USE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION AS MODIFIED
^*'°�°* *�--°° ^^^�°° A copv of the notice will be conspicuously posted ^� �� -�°^r `'�° °�•'''°^*
prvF n�'*�- * ����* '�� �� + � � ::: :� every SOO lineal feet ofpropertv
�crcS-vrmc�icrrccc.rc o�c°ca-orrvi c'saa�
adjoinin�a public right-of-way, 'a' ' _ . _'�=�.•'�r � ° " «" "--, r , ° ';. `�'"` "''.��� ���
r ---- -�
��..' `J '
EXHIBIT `�
PAGE...�..OF �--
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to short
subdivision notice requirements; amending FWRC 18.30.080. (Amending
Ordinance No. 07-554.)
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the need to periodically modify Title 18 "Subdivisions,"
of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) in order to conform to state and federal law; codify
administrative practices; clarify and update subdivision regulations as deemed necessary; and
improve the efficiency of the regulations and the development review process; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance, containing amendments to development regulations and the
text of Title 18 FWRC, has complied with Process VI review, chapter 19.80 FWRC, pursuant to
chapter 19.35 FWRC; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the City Council to adopt a new amendment for
the FWRC which establishes development regulations that reduces the number of onsite short
subdivision public notices from three to one onsite notices within the City of Federal Way; and
WHEREAS, an Environmental Threshold Determination was not necessary as the
amendment is related solely to governmental procedures and therefore, categorically exempt
from the State Environmental Policy Act; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission properly conducted a duly noticed public hearing
on these code amendments on February 17, 2010, and forwarded a recommendation of approval;
and
WHEREAS, the Land Use/Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council
considered these code amendments on March l, 2010, and recommended adoption of the text
amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission;
Ordinance No. 10- Page 1 of 4
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findin�s. The City Council of the City of Federal Way makes the following
findings with respect to the proposed amendment.
(a) This code amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the City and will
benefit the City as a whole by reducing duplicative notice posting and unnecessary use of staff
time and resources.
(b) This code amendment complies with Chapter 36.70A RCW, Growth Management.
(c) This code amendment is consistent with the intent and purpose of Title 19 FWRC and
will implement and is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan.
(d) This code amendment bears a substantial relationship to, and will protect and not
adversely affect, the public health, safety, and welfare.
(e) This code amendment has followed the proper procedure required under the FWRC.
Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to chapter 19.80 FWRC and chapter 19.35 FWRC, and
based upon the recitals and the findings set forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council
makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the
adoption of the proposed amendments:
(a) The proposed FWRC amendment is consistent with, and substantially implements the
following Federal Way Comprehensive Plan goals and policies:
LUP4 — M�imize efficiency of the development review process.
Ordinance No. 10- Page 2 of 4
LUP6 — Conduct regular reviews of the development regulations to determine how
to improve upon the permit review process.
(b) The proposed FWRC amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health,
safety, and welfare because it will remove duplicative land use notice signs on properties within
the city, while still meeting public notice requirements.
(c) The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the public and the residents of the
City of Federal Way because reduces costs associated with duplicative sign posting.
Section 3. FWRC 18.30.080(2)(b) is hereby amended to read as follows:
A conv of the notice will be conspicuously posted ^~ �~� ~�°�r +'�° �„`�;°^'
, every SOO lineal feet of property
adjoining a public right-of-way, 'a' °'���••'�r � ° � +^ ° "°'h" +'"'+ "'",+"
�,:.-..,. :.iaza:�tir:�i�
Section 4. Severabilitv. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and
severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of
this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall
not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to any
other persons or circumstances.
Section 5. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to
make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of
scrivener/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any
references thereta
Section 6. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective
date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Ordinance No. 10- Page 3 of 4
Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five (5) days after passage
and publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of
20
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, LINDA KOCHMAR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, CAROL MCNEILLY, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTNE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.:
Ordinance No. 10- Page 4 of 4
COUNCIL NIEET[NG DATE: April {"p,2010 [TEM #:�_
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJEC"f: NOKPOINT HEIGHTS PRELIMINARY PLAT APPL[CATION, FILE OH-100329-0O-SU
POLiCY QUESTION: SHr1LL THE PROPOSED 14-LAT NORPOINT HEIGHTS PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION BE APPROVED�
COMMITTEE: LAi�ID USE A:�iD TR.ANSPORTATION COMMITTEE �LUCC�
CATEGORY:
� Consent
❑ City Counci! Business
■
►/
Ordinance
Resolution
MEETINGDATE March 1S , 2010
❑ Public EIearing
❑ Other
STAFF R EPORT BY: David Lee, Associate Piannex DEp'r C ommunity Devetopment
Project Description: Preliminary plat for the subdivision ofan undeveloped 3.0 acre parcel into 14 single family lots. Zoning is RS 7_2/SA.
Attachments: Eagle Manor E{earing Examiner recommendation dated March 2, 2010; Preliminary plat staff report dated January 29, 2010, with
exhibits including preliminary plat map; anci draft City Council Resolution for No�point Heigltts Preliminary Plat
Options Considered:
1. Adopt the Hearine Examiner Recommendution and approve the Nocpoint Heights Preliminary Plat Resolution
7. Reject the Hearing Examiner [Zecommendation.
3. City Council may adopt its own recommendaGons and approve the Notpoint Heights Preliminary Plat Resolution.
_ 4. _ City Council may aciopt its own recommendations,and disapprove #he Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat Resoluqon ___ _ __
STa� RECOMMEtv[>a'r[o:v: Council approvai of the Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat resolution, based on the findings,
conclusions, and recommendation af the Federal `Vay Hearing Examiner (Option #1).
C[TY MANAGER APPRO V.4L:
Dini Duclos. Chair
� �,,�,�1�
Comrr�ittee
"1 move Option # 1 to the Full City
DII2ECTOR APPROVAL: _�� C�"/
Committee Council
the Apri! S, 2010, City Couneil consent agenda. "
Member
Member
PROPOSED COUNCII. 1VIOTIVY: " f raove adopl�oJthe Hearing Examiner reeommendations and approva�f'fhe Norpoint Heights
Preliminary Plat Resolution. "
(BELOii' TO BE COMPLETED BYCIT�'CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCII. ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCILBILL#
� DEMED 1� reading
� TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND RE.�DING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED — 02./Ob/2006 RESOLUTION 1� _ _
Doc. I.fl.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, APPROVING NORPOINT HEIGHTS PRELIMINARY PLAT,
FEDERAL WAY FILE NO. 08-100329-00 SU.
WHEREAS, the owner, Land Mark Homes, Inc., applied to
plat approval to subdivide certain real properly known as
fourteen ( l4) single-family residentiai lots located at Notpc
Way) near S W 353� Street in Federal Way WA;
WEIEREAS, on August 12, �009, an
issued by the City's State Environmental
W[-�REAS, the Federal Way Hearing
Notpoint Heights preiimina '
f�� �
W�REAS, fo, .'�� g the
F � 'fl i�
%�,%;,
f�.,
%�.,,.
Examiner issued a writte����ort �
�;,,,
. ..>,�:. i.��� /
�
approval ��I#�p���.�.�hts p�
A)
27,
a public hearing concerning
of sai�ring, on March 2, 2010, the Federal Way Hearing
\�t ti� •
tion c ning fmdings and conclusions, andrecommending
���%����'��,� � ..
plat sub�ec��conditions set forth therein; and
':>:'4t�`I tERE�, the Fe��Way ����ouncil has jurisdiction and authority p�usuant to Section 20-127 of the
��':. ;::.. ,�>::;.:;<
� `�«:.::>-:::<._ ����ti� ,�f•/�`�//�/
Federal ��`��;r:�ity Code to app�� e .�, deny, �modify a preliminary plat and/or its conditions; and
:...:.<;;:>,:,,_ ��
;::;�::.
Wt-�t�a� �Qn March 1�� 10 the City Council Land Use and Transportation Comtnittee cunsidered the
������::�:<.::� �.����� �
'�::�;;��
� �; �\\.,
record and the Heariri�`-.;,������r recommendation on Norpoint Heights preliminary plat, pursuant to Chapter 20
`-��;'>::',
�'�,��.
of Federal 6Y"ay City Code, Chapter 58.17 RCW, and all other applicable City codes, and voted to forward a
recommendation for approval of the proposed Norpoint Heights preliminary plat to the full CityCo�7, withno
changes to the Hearing Examiner recommendation; and
Wt-�t��s, on April 6, 2010, the Ciry Council considered the record and the Hearing Examiner
(Tacoma)
Avenue SW (Federal
on of Nonsignificance (DNS) was
Federal Way for prcliminary
istin� of 3.0 acres into
to Chapter 43.21C; RCW; and
Resolution No.09- Page 1 of 4
Rev 1110
recommendation on Norpoint Heights preliminary plat, piusuant to Chapter 20 of Federal Way City Code,
Chapter �8.17 RC�V, and all other applicable City codes_
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section l. Ado�tion of Findings of Fact and Conclusions. �F:�;:�';<;`«...
�.. �:
� ��'�;�,
. - ..`,; :!{.:!; ,; ` �� _.y�%�JF�f/
l. The fmdings of fact and conclusions of the H��nng �xaminer�`5�'�
:�::�.....
>:,�.:���..-:. ``
Recommendation, attached hereto as Exlubit A and incorpt�#�� by this reference,
findings and conclusions of the Federal Way City Cot�€�1
conclusion deemed to be a finding, sha11 be treated as such.
2. Based on, inter alia, the
recommendation, and conditions of
provisions for the public
as
2, 2010 Report and
adopted as the
,,,.
to be a co� , ion, and any
Report and Hearing Examiner's
subdivision makes appropriate
and for suc�YOpen spaces, drainage ways, streets or
�,�;,., - .�; .,.,,,,.
roads, alleys, other p���l�vays, transit s, potable �di��r supplies, sanitary waste, parks and recreation, P�Y
� �;;��;1 �\?'. ., _ .'%;�;;; ;.
. ..��
'�
grounds schools and schoo� u������ ,\ ��`��ataz�facts as are required by City code and state iaw, and
; �;fir; ,:<., `�\ ' ', �� ��`4 >;:
f,.... f . r .. ..,.�;:
i•
�'��.//��%
F ' F� f Fi.
providea �'b��idewa �s'���ther .' g features to assure safe walking condirions for students who walk to and
from
3. `'"';':,:�?'.< public use �� interest will be served by the preliminary plat approval granted herein.
���� � P' ��� roval. Based upon the recommendation of the Federal Way Hearing Examiner
Section2. A"'"
f;� �:i�
/r,.;,;
• `F�
and �ndings and conclusidns contained. therein as adopted by the City Council immediately above, Norpoint
Heights preliminary plat, Federal Way File No. 08-100329-00 SU, is hereby approved, subject to conditions as
contained in the March 2, 2010, Report and Recommendation of the Federal Way Hearing Examiner (E�ubit A).
Section 3. Conditions of Approvai Integral. The conditions of approval of the preliminary plat are all
Resolution No.09- Page l of 4
Rev 1/10
integral to each other �vith respect to the Ciry Council finding that the pubiic use and interest w11t �e servedby the
platting or subdivision of the subject property. Should any court having jurisdiction over the subject matter
declare any of the conditions invalid, then, in said event, the proposed preliminary plat approval granted in this
resolution shall be deemed void, and the preliminary plat shall be remanded to ��iry of Federal Way Hearin�
:;\'``������,�. -
Examiner to review the impacts of the invalidation of any condition or ons and conduct such additional
�;��.��
.� ��'� ,
proceedings as are necessary to assure that the proposed plat makes a��opnat ' ions for the public health,
�%%,; �,
safery, and general welfare and other factors as required by �; ,;,y hapter 58.17 and ,, able City ordinances,
F/F �r��•/
rules, and regulations, and forward such recommendat':, "��b the City Co il for further a
�'��s f � }/
;>;F,. f ,,� f '\��
/Fifi�/. ' �
i if'�`/ f .
Section 4. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, claii�'� of this resolution should be held to be
: •. �`%';; �i
,::.:;�;�; '�
invalid or uriconstitutional by a court of coi��sdiction, s���valiciity or unconstitutionality shall not
,. �i; '�.>a�:.�\� ;�/`i
s :::�:;<:, �`�'�: � �::::?�,._. �l%f,
...._ i\.t?.\,>> `l�/j j,
affect the validity or constitutionality of any o[�� cla ,,,��� phrase of this resolution.
�-,.:-.>>. ��,�;� � �
`:��;�:< *' ��.i`;�.�-.�, .
�`,�.,:SfFi;� '�'���vvv. \�����'\�
Section 5. Correc '��;� Clerk' "' ``:��difier� ordinance are authorized to make
%j � ) �'[_.�[
{'
l.�i i.'lrp::%.: : �i;i:;:. '` t`'- �S:'?,.. ,,�,, .
f f M.%!%i�.. \ \�\�•
. ,,/',%�/ � ,.,,, �=.����
necess corrections `� ' � f �� � �`�
ary , ordinance r�,�ding, bu limited to, the correction of scrivener/clerical errors,
references, ordinance
act
the authority and prior to the effective date of the
and any references thereto.
hereby
Way City Coui�
RESOL
This
ion shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal
WASHINGTON this
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
day of
20
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Resolution No.09- Page 3 of 4
Rev 1/10
ATTEST:
MAYOR, L1NDA KOCHMAR
Resolution No.09- Page 4 of 4
Rev 1/10
DEN
UI�PHY
ALLACE
e.L.L.c.
A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W
N. Kay Richards
Legal Assistant
206. 497.?231
krichards@omwlaw. com
March 2, 2010
Carol A. McNeilly, CMC
City Clerk
City of Federal Way
P. O. Box 97 i 8
Federal Way WA 98063-9718
Re: Final Decision for Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat, 08-100329-00-SU
Dear Ms. McNeilly:
At the request of Phil Olbrechts, enclosed is the executed original of the above-referenced
document, as well as a Declaration of Mailing.
Very truly yours, �
OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE, P.L.L.C.
��� f
N. Kay Richards, Legal Assistant to
Phil Olbrechts
/nkr
Enclosures
Esrablished 1902
A Member of the Internotional lawyers Nerwork with independent member law firms worldwide
1601 fihh Avenue, Suiie 2100 - Seattie, WA 98101-i686 • 206.447.7000 • Fax: 206.447.0215 • Web: www_omwlaw.com
{PA0768832.DOC;1113041.900000\ j
DECLARATION OF lYIAILING
Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat
Federal Way File Nos. 08-100329-00-SU and 08-100330-00-SE -
I, N. Kay Richards, make the following declaration:
1. I am a resident of the State of Washington, over the age. of 18 yeats, not a
party to this action, and competent to be a witness herein.
2. On the 2nd day of March, 2010, I mailed, via First Class U.S. Mail, a true
and correct copy of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision and this -
Declaration of Service to the following:
David Litowitz
Landmark Homes, Inc.
P.O. Box 26116
Federal Way, WA . 98063
Stuart Scheuennan
ESM Consulting Engineers
33915 First Way South, Suite 200
Federal Way, WA 98063
I declaze under penalty of perjury under the Iaws of the State of Washington that
the foregoing is true and conect. _
EXECUTED at Seattle, Washington, this 2nd day of March, 2010.
w
/
N_ Kay Ric ds ,
{PAO?68827.DOC;1\13041.1500301 }
.BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Phit Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner
RE: Norpoint Heights
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF
08-1OQ329-00-SU LAW AND RECOMMENDATION
INTRODUCTION
The applicant requests approval of a preliminary plat to subdivide 3 acres into 14 singte-family
lots. The Examiner recommends approval, but contingent upon the drainage pond meeting
public drainage pond standards.
The primary issue in this application was .the slope of a drainage pond. The proposed drainage
pond satisfied slope standazds for private ponds but not for public ponds. Public dedication of
drainage ponds is required by City regulations "as appropriate." City staff provided very
compelling and voluminous testimony on the need for public dedication of all .residential
drainage ponds. Staff recommended denial if the applicant insisted on maintaining private
ownership of the ponds. After the Examiner closed the verbal testimony portion of the hearing, .
staff and the applicant submitted a written agreed-upon conceptual plan for a drainage pond that
at this stage appears to comply with public slope standards. The parties also submitted some
recommended conditions of approval to cover private ownership should it not be possibie to
conform the conceptuai drainage pond to the standards for public drainage ponds. There was no
accompanying explanation as to why private ownership for the ponds would be appropriate in
this case. Unfortunately, the stafPs evidence for public ownership was so competling that the
Examiner has no evidentiary basis to conclude that a private owned drainage pond will provide
for adequate infrastructure or be consistent with public health, safety and welfaze as required by
the City's subdivision standards.
ORAL TESTIMONY
David Lee — Associate Planner for Federal Way Staff
Mr. Lee began by giving a brief description of the project proposal. Staff finds that four of the
five criteria for subdivision approval have not been met due to the extreme slope of the
stormwater facilities. Stormwater requirements require the dedication of the stormwater facility
to the City. The City is unwitling to accept dedication due to the steep slopes. The slopes
constitute a maintenance hazard. Staff recommends denial of the plat as designed due to ihe
stormwater facility. However, Staff is willing to consider conditioning for approval of the
preliminary plat upon the applicant meeting stormwater facility requirements. Staff
acknowledged that conditioning approval on a facility that meets stormwater standards could
result in a redesign of the piat that would require additional public review.
{PAO?68757.DOC;1113041.900000\ }
Preliminary Plat Recommendation p. l Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation
William Appleton — Surface Water Manager for City of Federal Way
Mr. Appleton began by addressing why the proposal does not meet four of the five subdivision
cri#eria. Essentially the pond does not meet the side slope standards necessary for City
ownership and is therefore not consistent with the public health, safety, and welfaze. The City
finds that it would be appropriate and necessary for the facility to be dedicated to the City, and
under the current s(ope design, it does not meet the requirements or standards of acceptance.
Under the cunent design, one of the side slopes in the pond is approximately fifty percent steeper
#han is generally allowed; which presents safety and maintenance problems.
In regazds to why the Ciry desires to have these types of facilities under City control, retention
ponds serve many important services that the City can best manage. Additionally, the ponds
impact other City surface water facilities, and thus if not maintained properly, can have negative
impact on City and eventually State waters. If these facilities are private, they are required to be
maintained and operated at City standazds. In addition, responsibilities for facilities, for which
the property owners are responsible, rnust be shown on the plat documentation. Eventually, this
means that homeowners in the development would themselves be responsible for maintenance of
the facility and would also be responsible for costs of improper function. Past experience has
shown that private ownership of such facilities has failed to meet City standards and has caused
difficulties for the Ciry and homeowners. City ownership also ensures quick and appropriate
response to any spill or other concern.
In the past 20 yeazs, Mr. Appleton cannot think of a facility which the City has not accepted for
z:naintenance. Although other cities take other means of management of stormwater faci�ities,
Mr. Appleton believes that taking on the facilities initially, rather than waiting for
noncompliance of private ownership, avoids increased costs and damages in the long tertn. Not
only the facility, but also the entire plat, would likely need to be redesigned in order to meet the
slope requirement necessary for City acceptance.
In response to the statements by the applicant: There are private stormwater retention azeas in
the City, but these were facilities accepted by King County prior to the incorporation of Federal
Way. Commercial developments are permitted to have privately owned ponds, which is
essentially allowed because only a single entity is in charge of maintaining the facility which.
provides greater assurance of appropriate maintenance as well as simpler enforcement. The
stormwater design proposed by the applicant meets the 1998 Manual standazds but does not meet
the City's maintenance standards. Landscaping, or maintenance of landscaping, is only one
aspect of the maintenance necessary for upkeep of the pond facility.
Eric LeBrie — ESM Consulting Engineers
Mr. LeBrie, and ESM Consulting, is generally in agreement with the majoriry of Staff's
conclusions within the staff report, except for the stormwater slope requirements_ He pointed out
that private ownership of stormwater facilities is pernussible under the FWCC and that there are
plenty of privately owned facilities. Additionally, if this project were for commercial
development, the pond would not be at issue, because those may be privately owned and
maintained, thus ailowing for fifty percent slopes in the pond, or even vertical siopes. There are
{PA0768757.DOC;1\13041.9000001 }
Preliminary Plat Recommendation p. 2 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation
also areas within the FWCC which state that some facilities should be maintained privately and
that dedication is only necessary where appropriate.
The property cannot accommodate a 3-to-1 (3: t) slope. The road is pushed as far south as can be
pushed, and the road is planned at its minimum permitted width. Forcing 3:1 side slopes in this
pond would essentially mean that the bottom of the pond would come to a point and the volume
requirements cannot be met. Because of this, the pond was designed with a 2-to-1 (2:1) side
slope. Private ownership is being advocated because the property owners cannot meet the design
requirements for a Ciry-maintained pond for that area.
Additionally, the applicants are designing the pond in conformance with the 1998 Surface Water
Manual. The difference arises in design due to differing requirements between publicly and
privately owned ponds. Where the requirements that the City pointed out for publicly owned
ponds aze true, privately owned ponds have much less stringent standards, per the Manual. In .
regazds to contentions by staff that maximization of lots on site aze the driving force, that is
simply not true, because even with the removal of lots 13 and 14, the pond requirements still
cottld not be met Also, the applicant believes that there aze instances when the management and
maintenance of such sites is more appropriate in private hands. Private landscape maintenance
of a 7,500-square-foot pond can likely be done more efficientty, and probably just better, than
the City. Safety concerns are likely to only reiate to professional maintenance workers, because
a 6-foot fence is also required. Nothing in the Federal Way regulations mandate publicly owned
ponds and it is common in other jurisdictions to allow private ownership.
Upon rebuttal: , Mr. LeBrie would argue that the site in question woutd have similaz constraints
as a commercial property and that water runoff would be similaz as well. Feaz of a HOA not
existing in the future should not be a reason for denial. In regards tv whether a change would be
minor or not, a reduction of lots would result in a simply administrative alteration.
EXHIBITS
See list of exhibits at p. 12 of the January 19, 2010, staff report prepared by David Lee. In
addition, the following exhibits were presented and entered into the record during the public
heazing:
L: PowerPoint by David Lee
M: 213/10 Memo from David Lee regarding conditions of approval.
N. 2/3/101etter &om Brianne Gastfield to Dave Lee regatding stormwater design.
O. 2/3I10 "Storm Drainage Pond Alternative".
P. 2110/10 Memo frotn David Lee regarding conditions of approval.
FINDING5 OF FACT
Procedural:
1. Applicant. David Litowitz on behalf of Landmark Homes, Inc.
(PA0768757.DOC;1\13041.9000001 }
Preliminary Plat Recommendafion p. 3 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation
2- Hearin�. The Hearing Examiner conducted a hearing on the application at 2:00 p.m. at
Federal Way City Hall on January 27, 2010. He left the record open through February 3, 2010 in
order to provide staff an opportunity to provide conditions of approval shouid the applicant
provide a stormwater detention facility �vith 3:1 slopes. The Examiner extended the record to
February 10, 2010, in order to provide staff and the applicant with additional time to agree upon
a stormwater facility design.
Substantive:
3. Site/Proposal Description. The appiicant proposes to subdivide an approximate three-
acre parcel of land into 14 lots for establishment of single-family residences. Street
improvements, water, sewer, utilities, storm drainage controi improvements, and other related
infrastructure improvements will be installed to service the plat_ Currently the site is
undeveloped and partially wooded, with 27 significant trees and thick shrubbery. Of the 27
trees, 11 will be removed.
4. Characteristics of the Area. The property is situated in the southwestern portion of
Federal Way and just north of Tacoma. The area is generaily developed with residential housing
of differing varieties. The land to the east is multi-family developments, and to the north, west,
and south aze single-family zoning districts with single-family homes.
5. Adverse Impacts. The project has und"ergone a SEPA review and was issued a DNS.
Staff received no comments or appeals. The 'sfaff in their analysis of the project identified no
significant adverse impacts and none were discernable from the record except that the initially
proposed stormwater detention faciiity constituted a safety and maintenance hazard, as further
discussed below.
6. Adequacy of Infrastructure and Public Services. As mitigated by staff, adequate
infrastructure will serve development as follo�vs:
Draina�e: Stormwater design was the most contentious issue of this application. The
applicants proposed 2:1 slopes for theu storm drainage pond. Staff testified that a
maximum of 3:1 slopes was authorized for publicly dedicated detention facilities.
Slopes that are 3:1 are consistent with the 1998 King Couttty Surface Water Design
Manual (KCSWDM), but not with the requirements for dedication to the City. Staff
testified that since Federal Way has been incorporated, all stormwater detention
facilities are publicly dedicated. The Examiner finds that, as testified by staff, public
dedication is necessary to ensure safe and proper maintenance. As testified by staff,
home owner associations are ofren unreliable and it becomes difficult for City staff to
cornpel maintenance. Covenants can be added to allow staff to maintain the pond at
the expense of the homeowner association, but these covenants can be very difficult
to enforce since ultimate responsibility is ultimately divided arnongst the property
owners of the subdivision.
In this case, after tl�e verbal testimony portion of the heazing was closed, the applicant
and Staff were able to negotiate a conceptual design that appears to comply with the
2:1 slope requirement of public detention facilities. This in part was accomplished by
{PA0768757.DOC;1\i3041.9000001 }
Preliminary Plat Recommendation p. 4 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation
displacing a 2:1 slope into an adjoining tract to be owned and maintained by a
homeowner's association. In case the stormwater facility ultimately could nat meet
public facility requirements, the staff agreed to allow the facility to stay in private
otivnership. There was no esplanation in the post verbal hearing written materiats as
to how staff cou(d conclude that private ownership was safe and appropriate after
having spent considerable time testifying that it was not. In short, staff provided very
compelling and somewhat voluminous testimony justifying mandatory public
dedication of residential stormwater facilities, and then agreed to private dedication
with no explanation or evidence as to why this would be acceptable in this particulaz
case. There is substantial evidence supporting a requirement for public dedication
and none for private dedication. Given the evidence, the Examiner cannot find that
private dedication will provide for sufficient and safe maintenance. The design of the
stormwater facility will have to be publicly dedicated and meet public facility
requirements. If the facility cannot meet public dedication requirements, it will not
satisfy the conditions of approval recommended by the Examiner.
Other than the slope issue for the drainage pond, the stormwater facilities of the
project meet the requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design
Manual (KCSWDM) as modified by the Ciry. The facilities aze adequate if they can
be publicly dedicated.
Transportation: As proposed and as requir�d by the FWCC, the subdivision will be
accessed through SW 353` Street, which connects to Norpoint Way NE. All lots aze
then accessed directly by SW 353` Stree�. The City's traffic engineer has reviewed
the project and concluded that the proposed street layout is consistent with the FWCC
and comprehensive plan in place at the time of the complete application. In addition,
SW 353` Street will be constructed to City Standard roadway section "W'
requirements, including a 28-foot paved roadway with curb and gutter, a four-foot
planter strip with street trees, streetlights, and utility strip. Street lighting is also
required. The Public Works Department and South King County Fire and Rescue
have also approved preliminary roadway design and curve radii as proposed.
Vehicular Access and eirculation: Concunency analysis was performed to determine
whether there is adequate roadway capacity to accommodate the development and
also ta identify traffic mitigation. The report identifies eight Transportation
Improvement Plan projects impacted by the pro and results in a 524,723 pro-rata
mitigation payment to address the problems (Exhibit A, page 5-6). The appticant
may either make this payment or complete the identified improvements.
Pedestrian Svstem: As proposed and required, the plat complies with the FWCC
subdivision code requirements for on- and off-site pedestrian circulation; and as such
a sidewalk will be provided along the length of SW 353`� Street. Full street
improvements include a four-foot-wide planter strip, five-foot-wide sidewalk, and
three-foot-wide utility strip. The Federal Way School District has reviewed the ptan
and did not have any comments regarding school access or configuration.
{PA0768957.DOC;1113041.9000001 }
Preliminary Piat Recommendation p. 5 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation
• Open Space: The applicant has proposed to opt in favor of the permitted fee in lieu
option rather than provide on-site open space. The fee in lieu of open space shall be
calculated at i� percent of the assessed value of the property, based on King County
assessment, at the time of final plat approval.
• Water: The applicant proposes to serve the subdivision with a public water supply
and distribution system managed by the Lakehaven Utility District. The January 22,
2008, Certificate of Water Availability indicates Lakehaven's capacity to serve the
proposed development. lf additional hydrants or other fiie protection systems are
indicated, a Developer Extension Agreement (DEA) may be required.
• Sewa�e: The applicant prvposes to serve the proposed plat by a public sewer system
managed by Lakehaven Utility District.. A January 22, 2008, Certificate of Sewer
Availability indicates the district's capacity to serve the proposed development
through a Developer Extension Agreement (DEA) between the applicant and the
district.
• 5chools: As part of the Ciry's review of the proposal, the preliminary plat application
was referred to the Federal Way School District for review. A school access analysis
submitted by the applicant indicates that the site is located in the service areas of
Sherwood Forest Elementary, Illahee Junior High School, and Todd Beamer Senior
High Schoo(. School service areas are review�+d annually and may be adjusted to
accommodate enrollment growth and new development. All students will be served
by bus access, and bus stops are at: 27�' Avenue SW & 351 Flace for the elementary
and junior high, and at SW 349 Place & Coronado Park for the high school. Bus
stops aze subject to change, as student needs increase and roads are developed.
School impact fees will be collected at the time of building pernut issuance.
Currently those fees amount to $4,218.00 per single-family housing unit. School
impact fees are determined on the basis of the District's Capital Facilities Plan and
are subject to annual adjustment and update.
The applicant's School Access Analysis concludes that without pedestrian
improvernents between Norpoint Way and the end of 27�' Ave. S.W., "there is no
other realistic access to the existing school bus stops" from the proposed
development. The project will be conditioned to ensure that this issue is addressed.
Fire Protection_ South King Fire and Rescue requires that a fire hydrant be located
within 350 feet of each lot. The Certificate of Water Availability from Lakehaven
Utility District indicates that water will be available to the site in sufficient quantity to
satisfy fire flow standards for the proposed development. The exact number and
location of fire hydrants will be reviewed and approved by South King Fire and
Rescue.
{PA076H757.DOC;11130A1.901}000� )
Preliminary Plat Recommendation p. 6 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Procedural:
1. Authority of Hearing Examiner: FWCC 20-i 10 (4) and (5) provide the Examiner with
the authority to conduct a hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council on
preliminary plat applications.
Substantive:
2. Zonin� nation: Single-Family — High Density, RS7.2 and Single-Family — High
Density, RS5.0
3. Review Criteria and Application. FWCC 20-126(c) governs the criteria for preliminary
plat approval. Those criteria are quoted in italics below and applied to the application under
conesponding Conclusions of Law.
FWCC 20-126(c): Decisional Criteria. A Hearing Examiner shall use the following criteria in
reviewing the preliminary plat artd may recommend approval of the plat to the City Council if
(1) !t is consistent with the comprehensive plan,
4. The application is subject to the ad.opted Federai Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP),
which designates the property as Single-Family — High Density_ The proposed land use of a
Single-Family housing development is permitted within the RS 7.2 and RS 5.0 zones and is
consistent with densiry allowances and policies applicable to this land use as established in the
FWCP.
FWCC 20-126(c)(2): It is consistent with all applicabde provisions of the Chapter, including
those adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan:
5. As discussed in the staff report, the project cornplies with all applicabie criteria in FWCC
Chapter 20 except for stormwater detention requirements that apply to public facilities. FWCC
20-183(a) provides that stormwater facil�ties must meet the requirements of the KCSWDM.
Section 5.3.1(c) of the KCSWDM, which apparently only applies to public facilities (the stafF
report does not make this distinction and the Examiner does not have access to the KCSWD1Vn,
requires that at least 25% of the pond perimeter will be a vegetated soil slope no steeper than
3H:1 V. FWCC 20-183(c) provides that stormwater facilities will be publicly dedicated "as
appropriate." As previously deter�nined, all residential stormwater detention facilities are
publicly dedicated and public ciedication is necessary in order to ensure consistent, safe and
adequate maintenance. Consequently, public dedication is "appropriate" and hence required
under FWCC 20-183(a). As a publicly dedicated facility, the facility must satisfy the slope
requirements of KCSWDM Section 5.3.1(c). The project is conditioned accordingly.
FWCC 20-126(c)(3): It is consistent with public health, safety, and welfare.
6. The proposed preliminary plat would permit development of the site consistent with the
current Single-Family High Density land use classification of the FWCP and map. Proposed
{PA076875�.DOC;1\13041.9000001 }
Preliminary Plat Recommendation p. 7 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation
access and fire hydrant locations must meet all requirements of South King Fire and Rescue, and
all future structures are required to be sprinklered. Puture development of the plat in accordance
with applicable codes and regulations. Mitigation measures require payments and/or
improvements for adequate infrastructure. As previously discussed, the project will also be
conaitioned to provide for public dedication of its stormwater facility and in so doing will have
to meet the slope requirements for public facilities.
One issue related to public heatth, safety and welfare that is curiously missing from #he City's
conditions of approval aze pedestrian improvements for safe walking conditions to school bus
stops. The applicant's own analysis indica.tes that there is no access to schooi bus stops without
pedestrian improvements between Nor}�oint Way and the end of 27�` Ave SW, see Ex. I, p. 8.
'The project will be conditioned to provide necessary pedestrian improvements.
As recommended with conditions, the project is consistent with public health, safety, and
welfaze.
FWCC 20-126(c)(4): It is consistent with the design criteria listed in FWCC 20-2:
7. The proposed preliminary plat would promote the purposes identified in FWCC Section
20-2 and the standards and regulations therein, as identified in the staff report, including
effective use of land, promotion of safe and convenient travel on streets, and provision for the
housing needs of the community. One exception is the design.,standards for the stormwater
pond. As discussed elsewhere, public dedication is necessary, corisequently compliance with the
design standards of publicly owned facilities is required. The project is conditioned accordingly.
8. FWCC 20-125(c)(5): It is consistent tivith the development standards listed in FWCC
20-1 SI through 20-157, and 20-178 through 20-187.
9. Development of this site is required to comply with the provisions of FWCC Chapter 20,
"Subdivisions," Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection," Chapter 22, "Zoning," and all other
applicable local and state development codes and regulations. As proposed, and as
recommended by the Hearing Examiner, the preliminary plat appiication complies with all
applicable statutes, codes, aad regulations, with the exception of the pond retention facility.
However, as conditioned, the application will be in compliance.
RECOMMENDATION
The Examiner recommends that the City Council approve the preliminary plat as set forth in the
staff report of David Lee, dated January 19, 2010, subject to the following conditions:
Public Works Conditions:
1. Pedestrian improvements to assure safe walking conditions to school bus stops as detailed
in the School Access Analysis. Final location and design of the school access path shall be
approved by the Federal Way School District and the Federal Way Public Works Department
prior to issuance of construction permits for infrastructure improvements.
(PA07b8757.DOC;1113041.900000\ }
Preliminary Plat Recommendation p. 8 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation
2. Design of the stormwater drainage pond shall be consistent with the conceptual design
presented in Exhibit O. In addition the stormwater drainage pond shall be subject to the
following:
• It must be demonstrated through the final engineering design and review process
that the design meets all design criteria for Public ponds, per the 1998 King
County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWD1Vn.
• The City will accept the pond for operations and maintenance, afler Fina! Plat
recording and upon successful completion of the City Code required post-
construcrion two-year maintenance period.
• ApprovaUagreement from the property owner(s) on the north side of the pond, for
a wall to be constructed on that adjacent property, and any walls built on
parcelsJproperty other than within the pond tract will be owned and maintained by
those adjacent property owners.
• Third-party structural review/approval of all walls associated with the pond.
• Walls to meet design criteria set forth by a Licensed Pmfessional Geo-Technical
Engineer and third party review will be required.
Planning Conditions:
1. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant must submit to the City of Federal Way
- fee in-lieu-of open space, calculated on 15 percent of the most recent assessed value of
the property at the time of final plat.
2. . A copy of the Home Owners Association (HOA)/Covenant Agreement must be recorded
prior to recording of the plat. The HOA/Covenant Agreement must contain language
which governs the responsibility of owning/maintaining common landscaping tracts
along Norpoint Way NE and the non-public landscaping tract in and around the
stormwater detention faciiity.
3. The power easement for Puget Sound Energy that runs north/south along the eastem
portion of the proposed preliminary plat must be shown on the final recorded plat.
Additionally, the buildable areas of each lot shall be shown outside of the easement.
Dated this 28`� day of February, 2010.
Phil Olbrechts
Hearing Examiner
City of Federal Way
(PA07687i7.DOC;1\13041_9000001 �
Preliminary Plat Recommendation p. 9 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation
£:ETY �9f .
� �� � .
� x
� � � r .� ��
COMMU1vITY DEVELOPMEI�IT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT TO THE
FEDERAL WAY HEARING EXANIINER '
Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat
Federal Way Fite No. Q8-100329-00-SU
Related File No: 08-100330-Od-SE
PUBLIC HEARING
JANU.�RY 27, 2010
2:00 P.1�1.
FEDERAL WAY CITY HALL
CITY COUNCIL CHA1VIgERS
33325 8`� Avenue South
Table of Contents
I. Generallnforn�ation .........................
....--• ..................
II. Consulted Deparhnents and Agencies .......................
III. State Environmental Policy Act ......................
....--•••--.
IV. Natural Environment .....................
.............................
V. Neighborhood Characteristics ..............
.......................
VI. General Design .........................
.....................•-......._...
VII. Transportation .........................
.................. ............... . .
VIII. Public Services ................................
........... ................
IX. Utilities ..................................
........................ ............
X. Analysis of Decisional Criteria ...................................
XI. Findings of Fact ..........................
..................... ..........
XII. Recommendation .......................................
................
XItI. List of Exhbits .....................................
.......... ............
...............................•---•-•---......._....._.........._...2
.. ...................................................................3
. .................................................................... 3
...................... .... .......................................... 3
....................................................................4
-• .....................•---......................_..................4
.............•--•---..........--•--------._.............._.....---..5
...............................•--•--................_..............6
.................................................................... 7
....................................................................8
..................................................................10
.....--•-•---......--•• ...........................................12
. ....................•--•--...._......_....._.....................12
Report Prepared by:
David Lee, Associate Planner -
January 19, 2010
File No: 08-100329-00-SU (SEPA Related File No: 08-100330-SE)
Engineer: ESNI Consulring Engineers - Stuart Scheuerman
33915 1" Way South, Suite 200
Federal Vl�ay, WA 98063
Owner:
Landmark Homes, Inc. - David Litowitz
PO Box 2b116
Federal Way, WA 98063
Action
Requested: Prelim�inary plac of a 14-lot single-family residential subdivision as provided for
under Federul Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20 "Subdivisions and requiring
appro�al pursuant to FWCC Section 20-1 lfl_
Staff
Representative: Associate Planner David Lee, 253-835-2b22
Staff
Recommendatian: Denial of Preliminary Plat
I. GE1vERa�.I1vF'ox��'rtort
A. Description of the Proposal - The praposal is to subdivide 3.0 acres into 14 residential single-
family lots. Street improvements, water, sewer, utilities, storm drainage control improvements,
and other related infrastructure improvements will be installed to service the plat.
The preliminary site plan, along with a conceptual utility, and grading plan by ESM Consulting,
are enclosed (Exhibit A). Addirionally, the tree retention plan, street tree plan, landscape plan,
and details plan, resubmitted August 25, 2009, have atsa been enclosed (Exhibit D)_
B. Location - The subject property is located at Norpomt Way NE (Tacoma) & 25'" Avenue SW
(Federal Way) near SW 353`� Street in Federal Way, WA (Exlubit B).
C. Parcel No_ - 252103-9026_ Legal description is shown on the plat.
D. Size of Properry - The subject site has a land area of i30,680 square feet (3.0 acres).
E. Land Llse und Zoning -
Direction
Site
North
South
East
W est
Zoning Comprehensive Plan
RS 7.2/5.0 SF - High Density
RS 7.2 SF - High Density
RS �.0 SF - High D�nsity
RM 180012400 Mulri-Faurily
N/A-Tacoma N/A
Existing Land Use
Single-Family Residential
Single-Famiiy Residential
Single-Family Residential
Multi-Family Residentiai
N/A
F. Back�round - The preliminary plat ofNorpoint Heights ��vas submitted on January 22, 2008
(Exhbit C)_ The application was determined complete on February 21, 2008.
Page 2
Staft'Report to the Fetieraf Way Hearing Examiner File No. 08-100329-0O�Uloo�. tn. szz3s
Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat
II. CONSULTED DEPARTI��IENTS AND AGENCIES
The following departments, agencies, and individuals were advised of this application.
A. Community De�elopment Revie�ti• Committee (CDRC), consisting of the Federal V1%ay
Community Development Sercices Planning and Building Divisions; Public t�orks Engineering
and Traffic Divisions; Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources Depariment; South King Fire
and Rescue; Laicehaven Utility District; City of Tacoma; and Federal Way Public Schools. CDRC
comments have been incorporated into this report where applicable.
B. All property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the site tivere mailed notices of the complete
preliminary plat application (Exhibit D)_ The site was also posted and notice published in the
newspaper and on the City's o�cial notice boards.
C. In accordance �vith the State E�rvironmental Policy Act (SEPA) and FWCC Chapter 18,
"Environmental Protection," ait property owners and occupants r,vithin 300 feet ofthe site, and all
affected agencies, �vere notified of the proposed action and the Citv's environmental decision_ In
addition, the site �vas posted and notice placed in the newspaper and on the Citv's o�cial notice
boards_
III. STATE ENVIRON1�tENT:�L, POLICY ACT
An Environmental Deterrnination ofNortsigniftcance {DNS) was issued by the City of Federal Way
for the proposed action on August 12, 2009 (Exlubit E). This determination was based on review of
information in the project fiie, including the environmental checklist (Exh�bit F), and staff evaluarion
of the environmental checkiist for the Norpoint Heights Subdivision {Exhibit G), resulting in the
conclusion that the proposal would not result in probable sign�cant adverse irnpacts on the
environment, provided the subdivision is designed in accordance with city codes and policies.
No comments or appeals on the SEPA decision cvere submitted to the City_
IV. NATURAL ENVmoIYMENT
A. Soils — The 1973 King County soils survey map lists the soils rype as Alderwood Gravelly Sandy
Loam (AgB). Aldenuood soils are characterized as moderately r.vell drained soils that have a
wea.kly consoiidated to strongly consolidated substratum at a depth of 24 — 40 inches. AgB soils
are descnbed as capable for urban deveIopment, runoff is slow, and erosion hazard is slight.
Typical soils excavation will occur with the street construction, at the site of the proposed on-site
water quality/flo�v controt treatment facility, and for utiliry instaliation. The preliminary clearing
and g� plan depicts clearing limits for construction of the following facilities: street right-of-
way, surface water pond, demolition of existing structures, and utility development.
B. Topogruphy — ESM Consuiting, has prepared a conceptual storm drainage analysis for the project
(June 26, 2009, Exhbit H). The soils characteristics are descnbed in detail in the report.
The City of Federal Way Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map does not reveal this site to be in a
problem area relative to landslide, seismic hazard, erosion, steep slope hazards, or 100-year flood
plain.
Stafl'Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Page 3
Norpoint Heights Pre}iminary Plat File No. 08-100329-00-SU/o�,� tn suxc
C_ Vegetation – The site is currently partially �vooded �vith thick shrubbery. A mixtare of conifer and
deciduous trees reside on the property. A tree smvey (Exhbit D) was submitted with the
application as part of the required landscape plan.
There are a total of 27 significant trees on ti�e subject property. The applicant has proposed to
remove 11 of these trees. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1�68, no tree repiacement is required.
Retained sigr►ificant trees outside of open space areas would be regulated under Federul Wuy
Revised Code (FWRC) 19.120.130 "Tree & Vegetation Retention Requirements at the time of
individual home construcrion.
D. Wetlands – There are no wetlands on site or within 200 feet of the subject property- No �vetlands
or surface waters are known to exist on or around the properry, and no wetlands or streamS are
identified on the City's environmentally sensitive azeas maps.
E. TWiddlrfe and Habitat - No wiidlife species recognized as priority species are lrnown to inhabit the
site or the nearby vicinity.
V. NEIGHBORHOOD CHa►RACTERISTICS
Yicinity – The property is situated in the southwestern portion of the City along the Tacoma/Federal
Way border, in a single-family residential area with RS 7.2, RM 1800, and RM2400 zoning
encorrr�assing the subject property_ The site is currenfly undeveloped The land to the east is multi-
family developments by the names of Coronado Village and Crystal Pointe Apa.rtments. The
properties du north, west, and south are single-famiiy zoned (RS 7.2) and developed cvith single-
fanuly homes.
VI. GENERAL DESIGN
A. Density and Lot Size – Pursuant to FWCC Secrion 20-153, all lots in conventional subdivisions
shall meet the density and minimum lot size requirements—in this instance, 7,200 square feet per
lot in the northem quadrant, and 5,000 square feet per lot in the southem haif of the praposed
develapment. The proposed 14 lots each meet these minimum sizes.
B. Lot Layout – With the exception of lots 1, 6, & I2, all of the praposed lots aze of rectangular
shape. The subdivision is accessed through SW 353'� Street, which is pelpendicular and connects
to Norpoint Way NE. All building setback lin�s (BSBL) are depicted on the preliminary plat map,
and each lot contains an adequate building area. A 50-foot-wide Banneviile Power
Administrarion (BPA) easement runs north to south within the eastern portion of the site,
traversing lots 4-10; ho��tever, the properties' buildable azeas are shown outside of the easement
and should not impact the easement.
C. Open Space – To provide adequate recrearional apporhuiities commensurate with new residential
development, FWCC Chapter 20 "Subdivisions," requires setting aside land on site for open
space, or a fee in lieu payment. The applicant has proposed the fee in lieu oprion rather than
providing on-site open space_ The fee in lieu of open space shall be calculated on 15 percent of
the assessed value of the property based on a current King County assessment at the time of final
plat approval. At the applicant's discretion, the market value may be based on an appraisal
conducted by an MAI certified appraiser or another professional appraiser approved by the Parks
Director_
StaffReport to the Federal Way Hearing Exarrriner —._ � Page 4
Norpoint Neights Preliminary Plat File No. 08-100329-0(?-SU/oM. �.o srae
D. Subdivisioii Access an�l Roadtivrty System - The subdivision is accessed through SW 3�3"� Street,
�vhich connects to Norpoint Way NE (arterial street). Section VII of this report provides a
detailed description of the proposed road�vay system and improvements.
E_ Pedestriun System - A side�valk �vill be provided along the length of S�V 3�3` Street.
Specifically, full street inTprovements include a four-foot-�vide planter strip, five-foot-�vide
side�valk, and three-foot-�ti�ide utiliry strip_ The Federal Way School District has reviewed the
plans and does not have any comrnents at this time regarding schooi access paths or
confi�uration_
F. Landscape Bufj"ers - In accordance with F1�VCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions landscape buffers
are specified only when the plat is adjacent to an incompahble zoning district. The proposed plat
is bordered on all sides by single-family and multi-family residential zoning; therefore, no
perimeter buffers are required_ A Type IIt (andscape buffer IO' in width (Tract "A"/Exhtbit A3) is
provided along the length ofNorpoint Way NE (�vest praperty line) in accordance to FWCC
Section 20-178(a).
V I1. TRANSPORTATION
A. Street bnnrovements - With the exception of lots I, 6, & 12, all of the proposed lots axe of
rectangular shape. The subdivision is accessed through SW 353`� Street, which connects to
Norpoint Way NE. All lots are then accessed directly by SW 353`� Street. The City's Traffic
Engineer has reviewed the project and concluded that the praposed street layout of the Norpoint
Heights subdivision is consistent with the adopted codes and comprehensive plan in place at the
rime of the complete application.
SW 353� Street, which connects to Norpoint Way NE, shail be constructed to City Standard
roadway section "W" as follo�vs: a 28-foot paved roadway with c�b and gutter, a four-foot
planter strip with street trees, five-foot sidewalk, and a three-foot utility strip with streetlights,
along all margins (52-foot right-of-way). The exisring right-of-way width and pavement width
appear to meet current standards; therefore, the applicant will be required to conshuct the planter
ship, sidewalk, street trees, streetlights, and utility strip as a condirion of this plat.
StreeY lighting is required on all streets, pwsuant to FWCC Section 22-1522.
The Public Works Department and South King Fire and Rescue have approved preliminary
roadway design and curve radii as praposed
B. Off-Site Tra�c Mitigation - Per FWCC Chapter 19, Article IV, a concurrency permit is required
for the development. At the applicant's request, a concurrency analysis was performed by the
City to determine whether there is adequate roadway capacity to accommodate the development
and identifies traffic mitigarion consistent with RCW 82.02_ The staff report of the Concurrency
analysis identified 8 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIl') projects i�acted by one or more
PM peak hour trips resulting in $24,723.00 in pro-rata mitigarion necessary to address any
failures of the City's Level of Service (LOS) standard. Concurrency applicarion No. 08-100331-
UO is hereby incorporated in full. The table below lists current TIP projects i�acted by the
proposed development and the appropriate pro-rata contnbutio� The applicant has the c�tion of
building the below-menrioned improvements or paying the $24,723.00.
Stafl'Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Page 5
Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat File No. 08-100329-00-SU/o�. � o su�e
VIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
A. Schools - As part of the City's initial revie�;� of the proposal, the preliminarY plat application �vas
referred to the Federal Way School Disri for comments. Comments from the school district
indicate Sherwood Forest Elementary, I1lahee Jr. High School, and Todd Beamer Senior High
School will serve the proposed subdivision. There is school bus transportation to all three schools.
The proposed sidewalk from the development will provide safe access to bus stops. Bus staps are
at: 27"' Avenue SW & 351�` Place (Sherwood Forest Elementary SchooUIllahee Middle School);
SW 349"' Place & Coronado Park (Todd Beamer High Schooi).
The applicant provided on June 10, 2008, a School Access Analysis (Exhibit I). The school access
analysis idenfifies a safe path of iravel for students walking to and from school. [n summary, a
safe route of school-related pedestrian travel will be provided by new pedestrian pathways, of on
average ftve asph�lt w2lking gath next to the driving �nrfacP_ A fitll detailed analy�is of
each pedestrian pathway to the schools is provided for within the School Access Analysis_ It
should be noted, however, dae to the distance created by the location of the new subdivision and
the existing schools, it is highly urilikely that pedestrian travel will occur with any frequency.
Final location and design of the school access path shall be approved by the Federal Way School
District and the Federal Way Public Works Deparhnent priar to issuance of conslrucrion permits
for infrastructure improvements.
School service areas are reviewed annually and may be adjusted to accommoda.te enrollment
growth and new development School impact fees, as authorized by City ordinance and collected
at the time of buildttig permit issuance, are currently $4,218.00 per single-family housing unit
School impact fees are determined on the basis of the district's Capital Facilities Plan and are
subject to annual adjustment and update.
B. Parks & Open Space - The applicant has chosen to satisfy the open space requirement of FWCC
Section 20-155 via a fee in lieu payment, which is recommended to be approved by the City of
Federal Way Parks Director. The fee in lieu of open space payment shall be calculated on 1�
percent of the most recent assessed or appraised value of the property.
Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Exarruner Page 6
Nrn7x�int Heigh�� Prelirrtinary Plat File No. 08-100329-00-SU/n�. �.n. su3e
G Fire Protection - The Certificate ojWater A��ailabilit}� from the Lakehaven Utility District
indicates tiiat �vater �vill be available to the site in sufficient quantity to satisfy fire flo�v standards
for the proposed development. South King Fire and Rescue requires that a fire hydrant be located
within 3�0 feet of each lot. The exact number and location of fire hydrants will be reviewed and
approved by South King Fire and Rescue_
IX. U1'ILITIES
A. Setitiuge Disposal - The applicant proposes to serve the proposed plat by a public sewer system
managed by Lakehaven Utility District. A January 22, 2008, signed Certificate of Sewer
A1'CIIIlIb[�Ity (Exlubit J) indicates the district's capacity to serve the proposed development
through a Developer �rtension Agreement (DEA) beriveen the appiicant and the district_
B. Water Supply - The applicant proposes to serve the subdivision with a public �vater supply and
distr�biition system managed by the Lakehaven Utility District. A January 22, 2008, signed
Certific«te of Water Avaidability (Extubit K) indicates Lakehaven's capacity to serve the proposed
development. If additional hydrants or other fire protection systems are indicated, a Developn�er►t
Extension Agreement may be required
C. Drainage Facilities - Devetoprnent of the site will create additional runoff &om new impervious
surfaces such as streets, driveways, and rooftaps. Storm drainage facilities are subject to the 1998
King Counry Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDlb1) and the Ciry's amendments to the
manual. The applicant's resubmitted August 25, 2009, preliminary Conceptual Storm Drainage
Analysis (Exhbit H) by ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC �vas reviewed by the City's Public
Works Department. The conceptual storm drainage plans submitted do not meet the City's
requirements for the following reasons:
Design Criteria - Per the requirements for Detention Ponds (Section 5.3. l. l. - Side Slapes,
item #3) of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design �Lfanual and City Addendum: "Pond
walls may be vertical retaining walls, provided: (a) they are constructed of reinforced
concrete per Section 5.3.3 (p. 5-35); (6) a, fence is provided along the top of the wall; (c) at
least lS% of the pond perimeter will be a vegetated soil slope not steeper than 3K I l; and
(d) the design is stamped by a licensed structural civil engineer. " The pond, as cunently
designed, does not provide the 3:1 slope as required in item (c).
Maintenance - The application proposes the storm drainage pond to be a privately held
improvement to ma.ximize the amount of lots poss�ble within this plat. Historically, privately-
ourned storm drainage ponds do not receive regular maintenance, and therefore the ponds do
no# function properly. Ponds that go un-maintained and become overgrown with vegetation
aiso lose their starage volume capacity and may go into overflow mode prematurely, which
can cause adverse impacts and potentially praperty damage downstream of the pond. Ponds
that are owned and maintained by the City's Surface Water Management division are
regularly maintained so that they function properly and maintain their storage capaciiy.
VVater Quality - By keeping these drainage systems public, the City can also ensure that
they meet the Nationai Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II Permit
requirements.
Sia tl' Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner pe� '7
Norpoint Heights Prelirrrinary Plat File No. 08-100329-OO�U/n« to.szzw
4_ Consistent �vith City Polic�� - Atl ponds in new subdivisions ha�e been dedicated to the City
for ownership. In order for the City to have approved and accepted them, those ponds met the
design criterion that was in place at that time.
�_ Safety - The current pond design proposes a Z:1 stope, �vhich is 50% steeper than a 3:1 slope,
and does not meet the design criteria noted above. A 3:1 slope creates a less hazardous slape
for those maintaining the pond using mowers and other power equipment, and the 3:1 slope
allows for easier egress from the pond in the event of accidental falls into the pond Life-
safety issues are not modified.
Additionaily, a landscape tract encompassing the new storm�vater tract �vill be dedicated to the
homeowners' association. The maintenance agreement for ihe private landscape tract shalI be
included on the face of the plat and the language shall be approved by the City.
X. ANALYSIS OF DECISIONr1L CRITERW
The FWCC establishes review procedures and decisional criteria for deciding upon various types of
land use applications_ Pnrsuant to FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," Section 20-I 10, preliminary
plat applications are submitted to the Hearing Examiner for public hearing_ The preliminary plat
application and the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner are submitted to the City Council for
approval or disapproval.
Hearing Examiner Preliminary Plat Decisiona! Criteria - Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-126(c), the
Hearing Examiner may recommend approval of the proposed preliminary plat only if the following
decisional criteria are met. Decisional criteria and staff responses aze provided below.
1. The project is consistent �vith the comprehensive plan.
Staff Comment: The application is subject to the adopted 2003 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan
(FWCP), which designates the property as Single Fa.rmly - High Density. The proposed land use,
Single-Family Residential plat, with 7,200 squaze-foot minimum lot size (RS-7.2) and 5,000
square-foot minimum lot size (RS-5.0), is consistent with density allowances and policies .
applicable to this land use as established in the FWCP. The application is consistent with the
follo�ving Comprehensive PIan Policies:
a. LUP I4: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future single-family
neighborhoods through strict enforcement of the City's land use regulations. -
b. LUP 17: Encourage the developinent of transportation routes and faciliries to serve single-
family neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian circalarion.
2. The project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those adopted by
reference from the comprehensive plan.
Staff Comment. The prelimiaary plat application is required to comply with the provisions of the
FWCC Chapter I 8, "Environmental Falicy"; Chapter 20, "Subdivisions' ; Chapter 22 "Zoning";
and all other applicable codes and regulations. Future develapment of the residential subdivision
will be required to comply with all applicable development.codes and regulations. As proposed,
the proposed preliminary plat does not meet the requirements of FWCC Section 20-183, which is
a component of Chapter 2Q, "Subdivisions", and therefore does not meet this criteria.
Stafl'Reporl to the Federal Way t�earing Facarruner Pa� 8
Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat File tio. 08-100329-0OSU/�_ � n szz�
FWCC Section 20-183 stipulates:
(a) All larrd divisions shnll f�e provided with adeqtiate stornz drainage system designed and
co��structed i�r uccordance ivitl� tl�e strrface water rnanagement reqvil-ements in
FWCC ?/-26 et sey_, uncl the storm and sr�rface Sti•ater utility requirernents tn FYT'CC 16-76 et
seq.
(b% �ls required hy the director of public i�orks, land divisions shall procide stormwater
detention or� retention facilities. Such requir•ed systerr�s should include bio-filtration stitictles,
oi/ivater separation clevices, or uny othel appropriate systems approved by the puGlic ivorks
director.
(c) As upprop� the storm rlrainage system shald be dedicated to the ciry upo» upprovul of
the final recorded docurnent_
The City of Federal VVay�'s Public Works Deparhnent has concluded that the storm drainage pond
does not meet FWCC Section 20-183 (a), as it does not meet the design requirements se[ forth in
the adopted Surface Water Design Manual as follows:
Per the requirements for Detention Ponds (Section 5.3.1. l. — Side Slopes, item #3) of the
1998 King County Surfuce Water Design Mara�al and Ciry Addendum: "Pond ►valls may be
vertical retaining walls, provided: (a) they are constructed of reinforced concrete per Section
5.3.3 (p. 5-35); (b) a fence is provided along the top of the wald; (c) at leust 25% of the pond
perimeter will be u vegetated soil slope �tot steeper than 3H_•1 V,- and (d) the design is
stamped by a licensed structural civil engineer_ " The pond, as currently designed, does not
provide the 3:1 slope as required in item (c)_
Additionally the Pubtic Works Department has concluded that, per FWCC Section 20-] 83(c), it
would be appropriate to dedicate the storm drainage pond tract to the City for the following
reasons:
Maintenance — Ponds that are o�vned and maintained by the City's Surface Water
Management division are regularly maintained so that they function properly and maintain
their storage capacity. Historically, privatety-owned storm drainage ponds do not receive
regular maintenance, and therefore the ponds do not function properly. Ponds that go un-
�nintained and become overgrown with vegetarion also lose their storage volume capacity
and may go into overflow mode prematurely, which can cause adverse im�acts and
potentially property damage downstream of the pond
2. Water Quatity — By keeping these drainage systems public, the City can ensure that they
meet the National Poliutant Discharge Eliminarion System (NPDES) Phase II Pernut
requirements_
3. Consistent �vith City policy — All ponds in new subdivisions have been dedicated to the Ciry
for ownership_ In order for the City to have approved and accepted them, those ponds met the
design criterion that was in place at that rime.
The Public Works Department can only recommend approval of the plat if the storm drainage pond is
desi�gned to meet adl of the design criteria for publicly-owned ponds.
3. The project is consistent �vith the public health, safety, and welfare.
Stuff Commerrr: The proposed preliminary plat does not meet khis requirement. The proposed
preliminary plat would permit development of the site consistent with the current Single Family -
Staff Repod to the Federaf Way Hearing Exazrriner Page 9
Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat File No. 08-100329-00-SUJn,�� 1 D 52236
High Density land use classification of the FWCP and map. However, the current pond design
proposes a 2:1 slope, �+�hich is �0% steeper than a 3:1 slope, and does not meet the design criteria.
A 3:1 slope creates a less hazardous slope for those maintaining the pond using mowers and other
power equipment, and the 3:1 slope allows for easier egress fromthe pond in the event of
accidental falls into the pond. This is a life-safety issue and is not modified.
4. It is consistent cvith the design criteria listed in Seerion 20-2.
Staff Comment: The proposed prelirrrinary plat would not promote the piuposes idenrified in
FWCC Section 20-2_ As stated in Criteria 3, the storm drainage faciIity design does not promote
the l�ealth, safety and general ��relfare in accordance with standards established by the state and
the city.
5. It is consistent with the deveiopment standards listed in Secrions 20-151 through 157, and 20-158
through 187.
Stafj''Comment: T'he preliminary plat applicarion is required to comply with the provisions of the
FWCC Chapter 18 "Environmental Folicy"; Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; Chapter 22, "Zoning";
and all other applicable codes and regulations. Future development of the residentiat subdivision
will be required to con�ply �vith all applicable development codes and regulations. As praposed,
and as enumerated in Criteria 2, the praposed preliminary plat does not meet the requirements of
FWCC Section 20-183 ���hich is a component of Chapter 20, "Subdivisions", and therefore does
not meet this criterion.
XI. FII�IDINGS OF FACT
Based on an analysis of the proposed action, environmental record, and related decisional criteria, the
Department of Community Development Services finds that:
1. The proposal includes the subdivision of 3.0 acres into 14 residential single-family lots and a
stormwater detenrion facitiry.
2. The preliminary plat application is subject to the 2003 FWCP, and the codes and regularions in
effect at the time the application was deemed complete, which was February 21, 2008.
3. The subject property is designated Single Family - High Density in the 2003 FWCP.
4. An Environmental Determination of Nonsign fcance (DNS) was issued far this praposed acrion
on August 12, 2009. No appeals of the SEPA decision were submitted to the City.
5. Zoning for the site is RS-7.2 (minimum tot size 7,200 square feet) and RS 5.0 (minimum lot size
is 5,000 square feet). The property is situated in the southwestern portion of the City along the
Tacoma/Federal Way border, in a single-family residential area with RS 7.2, RM1800, and
RM2400 zoning encompassing the subject property. The land to the east is rr�tilti-fanuly
developments by the names of Coronado Village and Crystal Pointe Aparhnents• The properties
directly north, west, and south are single-family zoned (RS 7.2) and developed with single-family
homes. The proposed residential subdivision and density is consistent with applicable zoning and
subdivision regularions.
6. Pursuant to FWCC Section 20- t�3, on this 3.0-acre parcel, the 14 proposed lots comply with
appiicable density requirements.
Staff Report to the Federal Way Nearing Examiner Page l0
Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat File No. 08-100329-OOSU/o� � o s�zaF
As proposed, each lot contains an adequate size and shape building em-elope to contain a future
single-family residence. Bui(ding setback lines (BSBL) are identified on the preliminary plat
map_
There are a total of 27 significant trees on the subject property. The applicant has proposed to
remove i 1 of these trees. Pursuant to FbVCC Section 22-1�63, no tree replacement is required.
Retained significant trees outside of open space areas would be regulated under FWRC
19_ 120.13Q "Tree & Vegetation Retention Requirements," at the time of individual home
construction.
Development of the site will create additional runoff from new irr�ervious surfaces such as
streets, driveways, and rooftops_ Storm drainage facilities are subject to the 1998 King Counry
Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and tlie Ciry's amendments to the manual. The
applicant's resubmitted August 25, 2009, preliminary Conceptual Storm Drainage Analysis
(Ethibit 13) by ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC «�as revie�ved bv the Cit}� Public Works
Department. The conceptual storm drainage p[ans submitted do not meet the City's requirements
for the following reasons:
a) Design Criteria - Per the requirements for Detention Ponds (Section 5.3.1.1. - Side Sloges,
item #3) of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manuul and City Addendum "Pond
walls may be vertical retaining walls, provided: (a) they are const►�ucted of'reinforced
concrete per Section 5.3.3 (p. S-3S); (h) a fence is provided along the top of the wall; (c) at
least 2S% of the pond perimeter will6e r� vegetated soil slope not steeper thun 3H.•1 lj• and
(d) the design Fs stamped by a licensed structural civil engineer. " The pond, as cutrently
designed, does not provide the 3:1 slope as required in item {c).
b} Maintenanee - Historically, privateiy-owned storm drainage ponds do not receive regular
maintenance, and therefore the ponds do not funcrion prc�erly. Ponds that go un-maintained
and become overgrown with vegetation also lose their storage volume capacity and may go
into overflow mode prernaturely, which can cause adverse iir�aets and potentially property
damage downstreaxn of the pond Ponds that are owned and maintained by the City's Surface
Water Management division are regularly maintained so that they function properly and
maintain their stora.ge capaciry.
c) Water Quality - By keeping these drainage systems public, the City can also ensure that
they meet the National Pollutant Discharge Eliminarion System (NPDFS) Phase II Permit
requirements_
d) Consistent with City Potiey - All ponds in ne�v subdivisions have been dedicated to the City
for ownership. In order for the City to have approved and accepted thern, those ponds met the
design criterion that was in place at that time.
e) Safety - The eurrent pond design proposes a 2:1 slope, which is 50% steeper than a 3:1 sl�e,
and does not meet the design criteria noted above. A 3:1 slope creates a less hazardous sl�e
for those maintaining the pond using mowers and other povver equipment, and the 3:1 slape
allows for easier egress from the pond in the event of accidental falls into the pond Life-
safery issues aze not modified.
10. The City's Traffic Engineer has revie�ved the project and concluded that the proposed street
layout of the Norpoint Heights subdivision is consistent with the adopted codes and
comprehensive ptan in place at the time of the complete applicarion.
Staff Report to the Federai Way Hearing Examiner Page 11
Norpoint Heights Prelirrtinary Plat File No. OS-100329-00-SU/o�. t.n. szz:+a
11. A safe route of pedestrian travel 1�iii be provided by constniction of a five-foot sidewalk next to the
driving surface, separated by an extruded asphalt curb &om the project site along SW 353` Street.
Final location and design of the school access path shall be approved by the Federal Way School
District and the Federal Way Public Works Department prior to issuance of construction permits for
infrastn�cture improvements_
12. b'Vater and sewer facilities are available from the Lakehaven Utitity District and are adequate to
serve the proposed development. It is the applicant's responsibility to secure all necessary water
and sewer services from the utility provider.
13. The applicant has chosen to sarisfy the open space requirement of FWCC Section 20-I55 via a
fee in lieu payment, which has been recommended for approval by the City of Federal Way Parks
Director. The fee in lieu of open space payment shall be calcutated on 15 percent of the most
recent assessed or appraised value of the praperty at the time of final plat approval.
14. The praposed preliminary plat is permitted by FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," and Chapter
22 "Zoning.'�
15. The proposed subdivision and all attachments have been revie�ved far co�liance with the
FWCP; FWCC Chapter 18, "Environ�nental Protection"; Chapter 20 "Subdivisions"; Chapter 22,
"Zoning�'; and all other applicable codes and regulations_ As praposed, the preliminary plat is not
__ consistent with the FWCP and a.11 applicable codes and regulations. Section X of this staff report
is hereby incoiporated into the Findings of Fact.
XII. RECOMMENDATION
Based on review of this application and pertinent decisional criteria, the Department of Conununity
Development Services recommends denial of the preliminary plat as submitted as it does not meet the
decisional criteria of FWCC Secrion 20
However, if the applicant elects to meet the requirements of Criteria 2 of the Decisional Criteria of
FWCC Section 20-126(c) as listed in Section X of this staff report, and as stated in Finding #9 under
Section XI "Findings of Fact", staff can recommend approval of this preliminary plat with conditions.
An approved engineering glan must be submitted prior to City Council approval of the preliminary
plat
XI I I . LIST OF EXI�BITS
Exhibit A- Preliminary Site Plan - Prepared by ESM; stamped "Received" by the City of Federal Way
August 25, 2009
Exhibit B - Vicinity Map
Exhibit C- Master Land Use Application - Stamped "Received" by the City of Fed�al Way January 22, 2008
Exhibit D- Tree Retention, Street Tree, Landscape & Details P1an (See Exhibit A)
E�chibit E- Determination of Nonsignificance Issued by the City of Federal Way
Exhibit F- Enviranm�ntal Checklist - Stamped "Received" ]anvar_y 22 2008 by the Caty of Federal Way
Exhibit G- Staff Evalnation of Enviromn�tal Checklist
Exhibit H- Prel'uninary Technicai Information ReQort - Prepared by ESM; Stamped "Resubmitted" by the
City of Federal Way June 26, 2009
Exhibit 1- School Access Analysis - Prepared by ESM; Stamped "Received" January 22, 2008
Exhibit J- Sewer Availability Certificate - Stamped "Recei�ed`' January 22 2008
Exhibit K- Certificate of Water Availabiliry- Stamped "Received" January 22, 2008
Statl'Report to the Federal Way Hearing F�caminer Page 12
Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat File No. 08-100329-00-StJ/ao�. cn. szz�
Note: Copies of exh�bits are not enclosed with all copies of this report. All exh�bits have
been provided to the Hearing Examiner.
TRANSI�3ITTED TO "i1 PARTIES LLSTED HEREAFTER:
Federal Way Hearing Examiner
Applicant Agent: ESM Consulting Engineers
3391� 1�` Way South, #200
Federal Way, WA 98063
Stai1' Report to tbe Federal Way Hearing Exarruner Page 13
Norpoint Height� Prelirrunary Plat File No. �8-100329-00-StJ/uo�_tn.szzie
:i�nli
�ff�"� �� _._:.
<:. >:�::. :>: ...,;_ .�ii�::. ;: .: , .:`: ;; .: ::
':.
>'
> ` :. �.: ';:::: ., �:i .: ;!1�;:: ::
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Mr. Olbrechts,
February 3, 2010
MEMORANDUM
Community Development Services
Department
Mr. Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner
David Lee, Associate Pla.nner J City of Federal Way
NORPOINT HEIGHTS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
{OS-100329-00-SL�
This memo serves as an addendum to the Staff Report da.ted prepared on January 19, 20i0 for
the January 27, 2010 hearing for the �Torpoint Heights Preliminary Plat. If the hearing examiner
is to recommend approval based on the items submitted for the hearing, the following are sta.ff
recommended conditions for approvaL
Planning Conditions:
1. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant must submit to the City of Federal Way
the fee-in-lieu of open space, calculated on 15 percent of the most recent assessed value
of the property at the time of final plat.
2. A copy of the Home Owners Association (HOA)/Covenant Agreement must be recorded
prior to recording of the plat. The HOA/Covenant Agreement must contain language
which governs the responsibility of owning/maintaining common landscaping tracts
along Noipoint Way NE and the non-public landscaping tract in and around the
stormwater.detention facility.
3. The power easement for Puget Sound Energy that runs north/south along the eastern
portion of the proposed preliminary plat must be shown on the final recorded plat.
Additionally, the buildable areas of each lot shall be shown outside of the easement.
Public Works Conditions:
Storm water flow control and water quality pond Conditions of Approvat:
If a Public (City-owned) pond
1) Design to meet the criteria set forth in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design
far public ponds.
If a Private pond:
1) A Drainage Release Covenant shall be shown on the face of the Final plat, and a
separate Drainage Release Covenant shall also be recorded against each individual
lot_
2) The Covenant shall include the following:
a) Maintenance of the storm water pond shall be per the requirements of
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Sections 16.35.020, 16.35.030, and
16.35.040, and as amended by the City, State, or Federal requirements.
b) Each lot/property owner sha11 have equal ownership of the storm water
tract.
c) Each lot/property owner shall bear equal responsibility for operation and
maintenance of the storm water tract, storm water pond, and all
appurtenances within the pond and tract.
d) Maintenance responsibilities ma.y be perfornied by the homeowners or
agent on behalf lot/property owners; however, operation and maintenance
responsibilities remain with each individual lodproperty owners.
e) Maintenance responsibilities include, but are not limited to: landscape
maintenance, fence repair, storm water structure repair, and all cleaning
associated with the pond infrastructure.
fl An Operations and Maintenance (O & 1Vn Manual shall be prepared by the
applicant prior to Fina1 Plat ApprovaL The applicant shall submit a copy
of the O& M manual to the City's Public Warks Department for review
and approval. The O& M Manual shall provide specific criteria for
response and handling of discharges of hazardous wastes into the pond
facility. The O& M Manual shall be recorded with the Fina1 Plat
documents.
g) An easement to the City for ingress and egress to inspect and monitor the
pond and appurtenant facilities.
3) A note shall be shown on the Final plat, indicating the priva.te pond tract shall not
be further subdivided, ma.y not be developed with any building or structure, and
may not be used for financial gain.
However, as of February 3, 2010, staff was able to agree with the applicant/agent (ES1Vn on a
conceptual drainage plan. The newly resubmitted detention/water quality pond drawing {starnped
"Resubmitted Feb 3, 2010"), along with the applicant's narrative and a cursory staff comment
letter have been included with this memo. Staff is possibly willing to recommend approval based
on this conceptual drawing, however staff would like more time in deternuning whether or not
staff will recommend approval.
Sincerely,
David Lee
Associate Planner
�..
G6
i
i
� WALL TO BE
CONSTRUCTED ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY
`�� �
--------`---�
�
��
-- 5' SEPARATION BETWEEN EMERGENCY
OVERF ELEVATION AND TRACT LINE.
.�. .� �.�
�-- ADJUSTED �OT LINE
� CURRENT PROPOSED `T
, I.iNE TO BE ADJUSTED
RESUBMITTED
FEB � 3 2010
CIN OF FEDERAL WAY
BUILDING DEPT.
�
W
�
I
Y
�
�
O
Z
J
r �
/ I� �
V �
= Z
� �
Z �
� �
� �
Z �
J � ��3 �
�
� � .sz
Z � ��� ��
Z � -
W �
M
U
� �� o ��
�
en 4 �
Z ;� > �
m � f --
�
m
s �
3 ��
�y
Ln
DETENTION/WATER QUALITY POND
SCALE = 1 "=20'
�
a�
�
m
�
J
PRELIMINARY PLAT
for
NORPC�INT HEI�'H �i S '
� .
prepared for i '
�
LAN DMARK HOIV� ES
P.O. BDX 26116 '
FEDERAL WAY, WA 98093-3116
prepared by '
i
�
33915 1 st Wfly South M200 ��
FEDERAL WAV, WASHINGTON 98003 �
Phone:;263)838-6113 �,
,.np �
d�6�
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY FILE NO. 08-100328-00-SU
ESM JOB NO. 1483-002-007 I
3HEET � OF S i
I
i
� nuc x e euav
C�IY Oi 1lDENqI
' BVaou+G oEr
;'
i
;
�.
Sheet Index I
�
Sht- N°- QSS�LiRSIQD �
PP-01 COVER I
PP-02 D(ISTING CONORIONS I
PP-03 Pt2ELIMINARY PLAT I
PP-04 PREIJMINARY CLEARING. GRADING k UTWTY; PL4N
LA-01 LANOSCAPE PLAN ',
. ._... .I . .
Exr+ieiT--u� c-
PAGE�-qF _=' ....
Vicinity Map
�
,
�
�
fD
�J
�� � � �MA�ra�,
� . i�uaon. �-rmu
irau'�m'�" —g � '_�_'_'
_ -- _ '_----' 'I n.s �� "-' M�n
I � �-�`'— ` i xurnwnmieunro
. �
� $4aM.fl
� ` � � �IBn•8a� qUlwu'.A
I `� I �C� fW � C9Y
�[i� ��y��uaw"�c 9. ce6 maa.rc.
° h�� 2 .w,�.M.
�i �� � �4., �
�I I �� �..:r.�
1 b. ~
I I ;B WhAltFo
1 \ ��
� `, �
r;., u,.x � � �\ , 'G..
�' p---'—"y'3-��--'_'---� �
� m� m
� I� �9 �'��
� o�\
I � �
I y ��
,'•. ' '.
�... l a,n,�u�,�--
• ��.w,�
6�'•.,.s. _.._..... .. . _.
a��
g rvris�enusB
� rxa�.�orwer.a�
• rolOpW
� wwns.no.
� .�re..�o..�.�
o .a.w+�Rwww
� wosYe
� ��
rM l!A
� IN�1101
Y Y � rK
�j( IRYIM��
Dy raw�t
—.— w��mn
—a—• arFMlt
—r- AfrNR
�.-. � II�BiIr11M10/IW
� — MIM 4Men bB W
� ..� 11M1101�II�YIVlYi11[
_.— W..d...�.
_ _ u�wnou[
ca�n �
�rc
��
M �r
a� -
� ��
P�
y r.ww
I �
��� a���i.Mi�ii °YO mw�iin� °p iso ° A�a�o a�nr"�
Ih 1�0110111 �t p16YFo
EXISTlNG CONDITIONS
, �u�,�� ,
, �moii4i. r � n I
cau�'"", n � llma.wv.nsr��^...°.��s:R..ww \ \aN_'_I9.ce�.
I
i
i
i
i
L
i
� �.
� .�
�
u�,
� ':��`�
�
, . �.��
� �.w.�
9�
' unia�.. �
'�"r..�.. gi�t
,!w— �� =�
� N
n Yq'
/ �1 � I
, �
, I
II ' i
I i
I �
I I �
�
� I
� t
I '�
�I
I 4�
I ry �
% I
i &
�I �
1'
SW 3561h St �����
_Q'��_._�
HIB17� '/"'
aE 7: pF_ e=
EL N0. 252101 9048
� ��r-:�-=�-a�,o-_�.�-��--�---sv—°—�. ( ' -- TL_ �� � �...�io.nur�,�..,�
o /���r : �i/: - " � � ,� , ..... i ... f . �.' «�:r w�v«m �,
� �� _ � �,
s /y �� ; � /�u; � '� if � � �1 m,a _
�&��i /'•. i i.,,, . i x i. i _r.. � � �.,,�'
'�i.a.,,��.e�A� 1 i .. i i � i ;� • �� '� �
, /� i ti�r�'"� �! � � ,a i �' �i �f� � � i 9 � 3 "�
i �y , a: %� i i i .��r :, ��'.,�7✓ 1 8 1 av�'' �
" `�'� � r : � % er ,� � � #�� � — —
;' � �rMUnx�� lu I � ; ;�' / ��M �@f�8 I 1A I
e
m�' "! � ' i i i '. �
., �' : ' i � i �'�,�� � � i
p� q i ' �i
� ',i�'M.�� " �," 4! , i c@ � �} � � µ aM�o `
� � i�n�, i
, ua ni.mw \•. . � � j �'��,.� ��', �� i I . �.iwuuu�b v' I
I u e ' ',. '� �'. 1 I
-� , �' � ' 1
_ � - �
� f '^_ . --r � �i I _ _ _ �� ~ ,y
�
i i �/� g�' � � y _r. � �
�
I ( � g
1 � �'. f.,/ tk. 'a ia`"�um4ir�ix:�nWms i 7P �." �\ i', i .5 � ' �'�y� � '
� '. �'�. I� �. I�
, �I � ..,�so�Mu � 1� 1 i �'' l � `1 �� � •' I �4 . (7 �� A . I
1 J r�m+ : � • � 1 � �l � 1 '•� � � 6
iy % �
�' 1 . � i i
r `; A%�.;.".��, � .� � �� i: ;� �
�� l � '� '': ,� ',��i � �� `� i e i ' `� .
� K � , � � i�� r,��. —�_ �
� .
1 ; I �1 '. � �.'� �• 1 \ 1 I. �'., I
�I aerw X ' I f:'� '��..��' I '� \\ I '. I'
+� ' � � I�� ' a' i i ! i `� �' �' I
I u air "�J .\�� � 1 B ��p � t+� ��a' � I � '! j� j�'�� a
I � 1 � Y, s. I
K ��;• �: °t o . i I
a� � � i � � �'' �•` ,r i � i � `� � � � ��' �
I �6 f
I� +un�zm.nK �; �� e �� °c 9 ' � I . I' .�1 � � I
� 1i 'i �...��, a„ _ _ � a �
� �� � �. � •� � ,� „ �„� _ � d
I \ H NxuV +nrn WAUhn / \ . �� p—��. �� \_
�� \ � I W !Il�Y � ` � lOf { � S�J
I �' � , 1 , �a� . . .
. $ �I i � .� I e .
I I CGei ix¢rRIPTION�' 1 J i ��
x i
� '� P
I fYM�I �tYiYY[fM.Vwi/W4S �� .. �\.'� .
AI�MbWpaM1MtILN.uLMtlP MrMRwd I'. W
�mm �ruewrma�afr�on
i iaewx uerruwxonwo`� �� . .. �,M'.p! I .
a19Yi1W14M1�W�p�� 11[MYY6p 0�90
MIMu[PWOIYMIqtMRqMwAY[NNYe 1 i
�MqNUtaMWrYUI��b�� �IEI�x� �
i ��� w� � ` 8p51S OF BEANINGS:
I "�ac.aiwewcw airnwn �m� � � ��'d I6 . . mewtanwrnuwn
�:.um.r�waw.ruwu
•aw�ucerm.n�ra�a \ ' ia�
� a � � '� \�J�I ' .
I .awma�eun�.�m...,w�min... + � y.n� : waa nawouw. KINC C0.
i wc i'Lw",". �.o� m °�w�"em�' ewr a wm. �`� wn� t,� � ..
I � � . '�6� . , VERTICAL DATUY'
' �.,�.,
� : � ° a�,� �� � i �� ; .,..,....�.�,
NViM Wk11Y � . \�..` ' pq�1�iOMY.�Mi�illxA.
��_�_��____�_ �
1���� _��_�__—_— . . . �C MIMYYw.t
.
i, ��y
�� �� � � _ . � I �.~� � � I Ali ARK HOM 5 -
11. ��j IONtl� Of a M1lMY . � I \�.
_ iawew 291n � NE . e•r `:`\
'�s' _�_�___ . YY aN 1 OM tl9
_
i
A PORTION OF THE NW CORNER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 27, RANQE 3 EAS7, W.M. �
nnreoo�v�u ;,' �
. .,. w: .,
' __..
msoaetozo eo2oasroo I i II ;� q'` . ; ---
3o7nae'17o0 bo�a8nto i nn! � wx oa �tEx aroc u+E� g I ..� •
IPo ��M'E WN� 8�2049DOfi0 PEN 4L flECp1X5E5 REYONI I � 'i • i \ l ..�_ .
I yY
sn r �
eozooeovoc --
� I � i-. -�'� I --... -swTr �----� °t �� - � , Il —
-- -" i i �
�a" � :: 1��
- _ ... �.
. :.« u mn �a� . vew� a � �`"' - ' _; a � � �� I w � �-§" = r�- yr . , e. ', --
:.�_ _ ; � � �. . .r _ L � � r '�'� 1 .
-}'�-��'- i i \ , � . ,..�,i " .
^° :'^. �/� J � I 1 ri-j =t � � _i- .�- � a �.. �M; ra e
;• r - /� 1 � I /�il. ' ,, �4'�p g �. _ .. :, • scn�e�•. ao� .;a
`y U ,�" ' . ) / \\\ � `n�p s� i I Be� sr ne�evorvo ' neie000 -
A zezasnoa� � �' I � � �I � --"�'-\ � II 1 1 / ' � . I ., eo --
` � C �� I�( � I / 1 / / 1 � ! � , � �II I I � i A� . .p_ _ �. m CONTOUR INTEHVAL � 2� o � �r�
�,:�.�.� � r�°C� \ j�� ��� � i I � I I �� x j.._ . i� _. _ �° r 8 a}
. �� _ ._ . __ ' _ � _
,�. ,\
.... _ . � j ir_ . �� � ' �, � aooze ��; , 'I _
y . � .s uxw� - r� � I � � � � �� �.� / � l . \ �` . i � �P' _ ----- � I rrotaooroc :� 3�?y
'+ u„nnrrtu { ,Y �,�I4o �� ; � i n ` `� �y, � j �.� I������, (� g � � � � ra,c � � �4A �
� .�� � � 1 � � I1 ....+.� �J' �: I -� bos .s� : �>xinoo�uo - ,,; I auwueic �xu ai �on �-io wu ec rrcr�ncrrn oue io w�
�� � I I J ', 1� � \ , I�.I / / �I � k PoWEP MN SEMLR/YM1iP ilSEULMS. S!1 NUV)I!U tlftl� S 5 ��
4NE5 $
� � � � ( �l � � �� � � � L � ��' �� I �� ' � I W � ��y ��
�j � � � ...�. �, �
�`� �� �I�� I I� / ����� � �� �� j �II�I�� �� � \ � e � ; �� � � —
��� � �� �I - i. - -� �i ,,. ..3��- i-�'rt smx ( ...�I I \ \ �i � � Cf' � � i rre�ieoonSlTE STATISTICS i �� �
� i f � -�� /� I .... � ...'. / S � � OEVElOVER/OnNF.k.� P o ��za '" �; E ��
—\ �g�, , " � rv �� � I y� j � ! � � �/ A , } I � 5 � �, � � , ( � �g.�+ ;� �o�w. �,� w� »��-���ti „ ;
ST�AM . 9�+� '�Alin i I I 1 \ r I; � c 3 wFVFraI. HnPwExsu�trtY�NC � .e
. V
� \ � i.e- � � �'F��4iTV � l � l ' o� ' ,. \ . 7 , - .. � �S iowa wnu� iia c � p
8380000D2 �� ' i I � 9aSf. \ ���� 1 �'' 1 �i� I I 1 :�, ��� �\� %;J s : G `7]EYWO9B0 i M�LUN.wnYe!]s � F
y, § � � / �� �, ° �� . , sr � , � qaon sv I � �ce � �uwn �f ,� � A �,,, : �� � v�-ea aau n E -
\ .g�� I I /� �� I � A 1 I j 2.�. . . lIN) I/ ' •. . �' 1! � .__ .. ENGNEER �. ESM CRISY�twc EWUrvEfNS LLt' u
.. 1 "" J]Yts t.l pP� SOUin SurE M100 � 3 `
� _.L. ' I I '� �" p� I I ` ' ,. . a IF�� �Y. ,� B�» 3 ;
nYe�e-n �a s �
, h, - - �✓ � \ I \ � �. � � neieoo�.v nuuecA: se2ioxosa n zos�wau.e
'•'� � � � � ' � � ZOMNC/COMP PUH PS) 2 k P550 MUtil-Ilwn.Y h fiNOt[ lMlt�i µGN �ENAIY I
� .� i�RA x •• �4 \� � r I � ,..+ I �'� 8 , ' � M ty -_-_— _ I PFOVOSED u5E . NESNENR4 - SNlCLE f�W lv � �
\ �.- u
tl380000i/b ' � '� � \ �. 1 ,�� � p- swr.m srxu: uKUwrew unutt asrncr
� . � , ' _�. � .. .��. �.r � .. � U I W�IEF� . 4kE1N`EN UN11Y qSfNMI � .
� - � I , ( �I ` . -' .. A '. .I. I.a�! I I I .....�' . � n � ', ` \\� �-BULLOwGSEIBPCn lmE � - - TRERWiIE� uS�W[Sf COMN�WGIW„5 �. � � ..
�` e0ep000�eo E ��� •«. � +� �"� t `'� y 1 �.. i 's°m�" �� I i 085 iy I� � I I w.4 sr �. soee a�� q i��. ..�! \ " t�eysoowa I rowcn: ncow c�cctwc �wo� ox vwn sou�.o �cam �
-� �,, r a � I' �; � � c"`� � 1 g � a,�e�`5� neieoo t��� �rvc w xu.n sccra�
� ' t ga � �: `.I �' i � s' lirv) �: i � � i�� ( � 1 �� : �. I PMCf� 9RF� JOB MA{5 . IS]�]Y) 50. R.
�'' eae0000no ' � i : �.� I,I I I ;�: /� sur�nce cacie � i � n w. ° cmw�'s�.�.'.`i.w, ° �. nz � si :
Y i ry
8960000170 �'.. LANDSCAPE ` h � • .�..- ...... � ....... �� I1 � : � � � IOiK ItlPERVqUS SUPfKE . tlGRG] F.
� ]Of[ MM IuPEwHO
' : W'mt uw -- ._ -. 9 ....... : 4. MS OC 1 1US� 6UPiI.CE . 1 W ACflF� S OW S.f, :
I I"�
�\� Toz�. w i __'_ ..���— '-- _ __` 3 LL ec cacnm mm favn�s SuNi.cEV W S
���a Ofi'SIiE MPFANOUS � D.o] IC. . l,Y65 S.f, :
I , w•uu+xw[nwWi � ',t62Y�Od6� -11 � � -- . OM1SiiC WG55 SU�/AC . O.OW AC. . IJtl S.f. t � � 'I' Z
83E0000094 �UI < I > wl ) I. SfOPMYMRR IPILT MG . IO�IOG S.f. s O {�y O
.. NFM P�C R0.YMq MU � 48.0]9 5.�. : F
eae0000a�o �'�. eae0000tu �`, ��Y". rcress m�cr �wc. - �.um sr. : 2 = a
I . � a`s`� urmswc min _ �.ero s.r. : Y �
� �"� U
1 l j I _- � �� NET PIAi MG (NINYS POMM��, /�CCE55 fRM:i, SNHNwn1EN �
� '\ i iRICf) � 9t,01B S.l, � Y.UY KACi. Q �
C G
' � eae000a�en ,t 2ez+oauot O in
• � �f ♦ R/W t O
�� � ---�----- ---�--'-- Q
ase0000zti eae0000rw �., I e3e00000u7 d zeznauun�i . "� Z a�
L---- --"— o -
1.� - a kw,e I ; � .a' . '� �
�', __'__ "_'
eae0000z72 �' , a 4�� � �
..
� N � H3WOOOOB9 ry3bJO0UGHtl -a m� ,I � 7
0
�. . � � � I I ,� R.Oa , 46 20. �rz.OE ` �
.. ....... ............ ...__..._ . ..."".__._•_�__. ��t 'n. i . �-. .
u _
y �� $§ 1' IXICM CEMfN!
a � " � w � '+/� wriwne � $ CaNC, LoEhNn lRr) —� CMM cuxB • -- �. � i' l a k � �
s �� I � a.u��,..w�.acu m.c� ��� t cummn rwc � inP� ��)tH181T_ ir;; .
t ! J ---- i d' �s o� � _ �'I � �• �.A. cu�s vc m-aa �f� ce �
ff C 9 � �.o' - "30 _ e. "� �:o T . . FNGE�OF � �
Y1 Z srotw�uK siotwnu� 7 n wr. x ,�ccw - 'I � s-,/Y w+. w�w.crto ann cxwak:o wrre..:w.; -�
� t uo� w�PfMw,w •o oi n,� w��u i�ar i . . ror �rouxs[ _ —
Y uni. couwcl[o xvn� cnus�KO sunr.cmc e�sc cauxs[
��� e w• s• � ?�i muwnio wwwec
I � -sL _7a._ '�- �..W��I,� �
i 1�-- �'" � SECj'ION A•A —
R SECTION GC ��� TYPE'W' SECTION —� �
y CUL-DE-SAC SeCTtot� e-e •� � �� e^ � PP-02
3 ROADWAY CROSS-9ECTION "Z" Mf�DIFIED PRIVATE DRIVEWAViNON-MnTQRI�PDPAIH
-4 xor x � � }o scux � '�.
� a CITY # 08-100329-00-SU 2 �, 5 x..,.
.__. . _.__._..__. � � ��. . �
.. .. _ ......_ __-_._--------..._`...------- ��' �� ------ ...---�--
� -�---- l . _"_------- . . . . .. _ .
'v
v
�
m
�
�
�
^ V ,
W
f�
...1
�
.� .�..._..._. .._.._I �'�r�* �ry� �A �.
, -�'- —._��—: _- r^ �� 1 _1� -}- --1"�
' � ..� � �
\ � ..i �� /� ! �� � \�:� a`w 1 ��
�� � � I I �� ,: � i � � �
I� I �I I � � �� I I �
�`1 �� �� � ��� �1 � �
;��- � � xrm µo w�ia uso�.� I � I� ���' I.
ipl UX61�NN UI41Y q51.
� �u pooaiaiwomx i i I "°u4 / 1 j \ 5
�
_ �° � �' j �� ��� % � � �'� 11 �h,•
� � ( . 1 � i2•x7uAAOna
,�, �
` � � ����� / / �,.� ��� � I ��', ��'o
I I � � // I � � �� �'�iB
I I I �
o a\ ��.� � 1 I, �� �
� �v vo n� `�'+�� u � n� ri r � sr��f" l \
CUproffOCy{1IXhley.'COSIIB�..�a�*'�I^���'"�Ari�M�� �
� s«cue �cow��o y ��� (
W _ 1. _ 1 1 1 � �
� ___- _ "_ _ r � _ � _
� � ���� � � � � .. �;lO�FlR
�\ _ .. � �
' \ _ _ ; �'roomu� opu�us II I I I I . . . L ..� '�.
� �� I I I 1 �
�� ..._—_ l ` "°�'w�"�' I h 3� I \
r
J �
o \ _ �141 I I I I�1 \
� _
�O� � 1 1 1 I � ���'�" I I � e
�p ' — ` �-
�yc^
LANDSCAPE i
TRACi�TYPE III) � �
� t2 . p�nwCYP��Y."C fbv�e�b�" � 1
i _ aoNO erWiarnun�w � I i I 1
s ' w
�� � � �m�s nao � �eru �xe�s� � � 3 I
�
\ � I�eR161f ron6 la� ho� on si4el I �
i
\ LANDSCAPE �7 ! I I I I 1
/ 1 ! I I 1
TRACT(TYPEIII) _ lr ._._
I CODE REQUIREMENTS �
_ YMPxNWARP�G4uEn1 �rvCCao�)awivrtP[WwHFqSp[OUn[owxFxEm�� �
fOAlMY1N'MUiMII1p41. �gy�SnHMIeW.if1lrtfl. ' �
_ Bcc�RW„mwaone w cvuinuienror+uensuwvcceuuwne.coue.uu �
.. �, y 1�-1 .w�es. wc,verunaw e nep�xma���cera.o�� x
. . ''I� q... _ 3'YSnAZE 1 .HCweu+�ers�aeEewuveoweonwwMrvcewnn •.
._ � .' _ .._-.- .�� . a.51PEfl�RRw�nIN6MNU9N.t1E�[xlpn�WUOW"fiR 6,
�
�V � _ � "�°��,�� ,
,a
� u���
- 9 r newie�iwwunrxwrom.0 ..
!M OfPN+I5�01fp10u6xt10lPN�
o�nG v�[
MwLt i4 VnlillFS.
ur�ita FW4�ECINx
ire °ou i rvOC �r� wx
NEW OPCIGY031MF8�0 !S ]. SWpPME K �0� 9E I/IOM'�.W W! /Wt M R14vqfD T' N1�(IB,
rrtw evaexan ��us w E. NEW SMRI! Yb9 NID VNx MUS IyYy I[@2 /. yW. pI 1' QVDC '�' t009P� Gp �C COUxT
i, � MIT G . w.w.ix mm,w� Jvat. Ecaaor cwo[uxcs mctlxq�we(w�eM1Ui wro lav t ar tnelrt¢ weavOC.
I MOWCCOVlRS P,wlm W CC1vM Jnw q� u� YGS ro n[C[hi rc 3••M[-MfquY� Wx w�La 9uBxrt vnML ro u tax Mvxwx.
� M jll FW / q TI,wpSCMf.Wf�[�OP[CBVF �Ia�M� 10.N.1 PUNf W1EbL M i[pli4iEp WTn N.1p IP.WSYVI�IEN FfR1WEfN �-3-P PER
�� l� .I�wDSGreMFK�ox[CEweY.aNwCn rMluriCtuMRSUCaWExu�TMS.I �
L / g A B.iwCC�A�6MSi0NfIGNtiNHf I R.wf Wl[IWi SNYL CGYMY 10 AW fWlCNGS IOR 1� QNYW4 uf NuR4Fn� S�OCK
( dutOfY&ICANI�AlO eExNUUFO ' rtil �Dqiqx .R[RMEYMIB SWl B[ wOE nT ONCE
3�� 7M%1MlDRONA�! tl .SpwM1Cnn1�RN3Mf0YN�b 4-0! TUV. � .N�1v Ni0 Sw� �� N w�&� d�' �M�ET wa BE iwi 1nFw
: .� JTCMNMIEMENCE GOq3MN 'q10[IPWM+IM BRWCMfiD, M41 YRWOWqx[D �xY wYC vM:OR0u4 N001 SRtEU 1
� ��COr/MUw1Y 96MFGW1 ] O� WCWpf; � UNOFR Cu�.unC�NMCrtqHS AMIM 10 1xYY W 1HC 10CKIM1 Of �vE YROifCt.
,�.��o��w� � ��
. i p vcw�cµ��x sw�a�eowrra,wx.n.w�o ,ntcs �n ws.w wwrro�wcm� aw�m... morcs. µo v�ws..�cs,ra Wwma�
�.ecHweN+ri�wwxenwrteroouu+ccoxnxucno�. •s awm� an vu+mxc Pvn: vwirs m x rrru�rt rwo�ouz ww raa+�eo wncx m �r.v.
./ _ U ' Fb'MW Ow/+�CRCO�Ox�TV' y�fAOM M9GSG ANh MXC18 O6W MVMM 0[RCi9 NIO MClD fME. uBSIN�PVS
. a� co�"'r«�,ecimn . qa.euwxveroxsuoox rar az wnc �mrwur i�c bnwnmem or u,e unnwc .�nccr o� owxw.
\ I x u�wscuieo�uineax . �zw.rn s�wi ec swn�co ro w,uaan cwrt w�mw uxm es.aus�co.
�� �, �. .._.. � .wnu�rmcs� o�wun�orv� .
d/; � COnPoM+�i�CEMIxIWC ffiSN
I � J' �. PLANT MATERIALS LISt
i SYMBOIOUAN�IfYlOInI�NCMIUmE GOmMOHrvMnE SItE/REmARKS
� �....I I � IRqES '
NonivaWlllWo'&Iponikfima" BNYeMReOClwkxoeny b'MULMIEMCLUMP��SIEMMIN�
I.: 1 • ac ��roam 4r. t«ia.�ww� �c�n�� caoc� cro�� e. ruu odue su�c� �t��x r oc
C� � \ � - � � . � __�_� Kvn.MYwr d,vca 95'ao. wmcneaWfmm. nw�crwa
� 4rl�or ivs►s oce. crn nriwit- d'49 � 2e'
'-'" --"-"� � !4 Carw�stabirt�ro[W�evl Urvu�RedlwpWpwootl IB'iYOc
� '� MeIM calYSNyPaIOn� NypeilmDOylYy RyplCYrtip.]Ubc
! PdY��mmuMNn� we��emSwoMFxn Iwnspbn�rtpnonpel]�ol�Ceddna�aw/GC
�� , � � �, w rtVaowvm'Gmsvm' caaMm�ebc�uyaas� xpa aa•oNP�lcaoincceml
' \ � . ���:+,(tl�RWERII . � . .SaWS opwYw. wmlwneMUMUin/un Y4"O/'oe.0wdrymuHblum
,, 1 �:yv� w����wa m� co�i o.bn uum�aco w� r.u.s
'��'` / � ' V� x..,��.a„m E.�a�.o�H�n x.wa
1 [� e wn�inouw� e„rowancemnNrvew� s��.s'x.w.osm.
/'� � � \ � ' l � I'^'�I 17JOSl lownI50D11ocdWpawn.l�sc�� Pw�malrvWqYdsnG .
�1 �_ i �a �--r--__--e��r��ra ioxmeaao�.ro.ia�
; � � � � ���aRASSMUIPONGUPUN�S�5C1LIOwCaowYaierNdMVep0�f.5U1{EroyNaRWPqc���SEEOiNGPA�E�IBpNpnacn.
Of
.. � . \ NYOROS!lbMIXiOINCW�CPER�CRE]OOONIOn9brpiM1wodMGrmukM1.'180X.1?]41�IeelYZp.lOXfbwrebaHlarlNletn{veXkCrOle01
�C
nanaust ux a C �p o �
wrwuF iaw,i¢Smv�nax �/`. ��j�, r
�� nun
� / MMtE � .. � � �.
�� 6 '� , � TREE LEGEND
� . �'I... � �COTi0NW00D 7REE
\ 1 � ,
$��t NA2ElNUi
nw�D 'n��� �� t5vi � Il R�?,� n1.DEk iItEE
�� SO MAURCi1A � '. ( � .
.. . �4 . ,,. { � CEDN2 IREE
.. _. J l� � � FIR 7REE
i
_ - . - . � I� MAP�E iREE
� �
. - �--�� �,i AVADAOru tflEE
0
T �'i
� f ' � � • rnnt ircs
� . SVECIf1ED tXEE
S1MEI8)
� �� 1FMNC V.9N
�pp �/� p� q�p�pp 4 Y!P[c�Fao �u�cn
� �� YECkEG Y�1M p _y�EC1Yrt0 T,Wfi
II 1 11�11 `
:c�� . ��� A .����� t .
�.��� ��� ���� f1�; 1 ; I�. ,1 N ..ILII
�, �, i�
.
M N �I n n�ma; �`��
�.:.!uc - _ _ ■ � _
� p OF EXISiING 1REES 12�DIA. pt CfiEATER• )4
� / OF SIqdIFICANT iREES ='�, 27
�/ OF NON SICNIFlCPNT 1REF5 � 7(6 UEa, 1 mopie)
�� UF 51(�71FICMV7 TREES NfQU1AE0 TO REMMN (25%) =7
'�� oF ta�ts s�wxn To rs[HaN = is �sm: a ruru)
��� mrz�. � 4wnc�i ixcs rnc xcaw�o ro Awrai va
nrt vwcc wanowi. �cs xu e� e�[wt�o wexct
IO (AAOItlG KWNEYENIS
L�wnm.uw�ba ��
r
� wmvn�a.wm . .
u�
�Y nt
._rioim 1�Y rt�1 ' .
^'"'�'�" � :.Y:ri161T.
_ "m�m °m"'� "u�" � f'NGE `
_,y;��,+ncam. �.
.���.�..
� �"" PERMIT N0.
. � �p ;
1,.��uT""°"' CITY Of FEDERAL WAY
� �� ��
�
APPROVAL DATE:.
Detail ,
THE
OPER
)MPANY
�
jHEIGHTS
F�DERAL WAY, WA.
LANDMARK HOMES
g
1"=30'
l.l
110F1
1 ��
{ ]
l
4
�
,�
��.,.
r��
' �i
Nor oint Hei hts Prelimina Plat
p g . �Y
z� � �,� .
`�,� Ir
���r�.�t�`�C!i�k:� �„�,E�4.��h�'?�41����.4�w� `� i �b� �
g
. �.�
�n
�h � � � ' .; �_ _ . ?ar�� � �a���` _ ` �, s^� � ,,
� "` ` � �'r,�„� � ,,.�,�,�.,�,
:s�a a � : � __
� � ����
� ,�.�,.
r �+ �
� ` ° �?F��' '� "'+�,tc. � "' �.
� �� � i,�� �
r� � �y I
`v � �y . , a' ,
4�r.� �11�� ��F�I
' � a �.�F�, � ���"�:
,m , z � �s �����,���; �� � s�.,,�.�
�;� i.�:.�--�a �a 7 .ak .c� a t�;� � � i-...;',� �
r �__ _
�:' � r
4 �Y ��
�
7 �{�:?� it 3�. M1.-L ,y�,�.» »�.:�s�� d '_ -
�J � -;
n
�'�� �,,, '
�._: ;�1 , ,�`
83 '� tiv;. � � �� � � ���\�� \V ` � ia�r+u,
��y,..a`� �� �A A���� . � I�;' u"3`�,v v L
�� \\��
1� ��A�� � �� � �'
�� '� `�\�,��� \ �� ;` -� �
�� � � �
� � �������� ��� ��� � � � �
'a � ������ �\\�`� ����; �
� �
's` � AV�; ��A ��� ; .
� ���A �� �o�� � : �� ,� a
V �{ `�,�� ��` \ � � �� � � i �
�\ �\\ � :<� � a' �;
�
��\� �\�\������� �� �i ,t
n
I V �
,
, �.
,_.
' � �
p I �
9 `�
, _ � . . . �� `���;
Federal Wa
y
Proposed subdivislon of 3 acres into
a 141ot single family subdivision
� Legend
��,_,__� Parc�s
Paved Edge of Roadway
Q Federal Way City Limits
Slt@
�
0 500 1000 1500 Feet
�
y � :s .. �
' � , - i .3
.
H�
: � E r= _� .. ..�..,._a _._ a.. , „u �,�, � .�._�.._�
�' ���`�=:Y �� �� =�
` -�.- � `� �� � .� �.�� �. � � � �
G'ITY t3F �! �
��'��'�'�� '��c� � 1:�; � �� ���a
��� � �""
Appticant
� � ��{��i��. �►Y��
�D�
APPL[CATION NO(S) � ; - ) �'C �2t� �- � i �, , �'�' "1 �j � ���('j �S� Date �g � " �� • C� �
Projectl�Tame ___Norpoint Hei�hts
Property Address/Location SW 3�3rd Street
Parcel Number(s) 2�Z�d3 —' ��un
Project Description Subdivide about 3 0 acreS int 14 ingle familv re�idential lote, accesa road anc� stormwater
PLEASE PRINT
Type of Permit Required
Annexation
Binding Site Plan
Boundary Line Adjustment
Comp Plan/Rezone
Land Surface Modification
Lot Line Elimination
Preapplication Conference
Process I (Director—s Approval)
ProCess II (Site Plan Review)
Process III (Project Approval)
P[ocess IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision)
Process V (Quasi-Judicial Rewne)
Process VI
� SEPA w/Project
SEPA Onty
Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use
Short Subdivision
X Subdivision
Variance: CommerciaUResidential
Required Information
EZS-�.0 & RS-7.2 Zoning Designation
Multi-tamilv &
HD sin�le eamiiv Comprehensive Plan Designation
$300,000 +i- Value of Existing [mprovements
$500,000 +/- Value of Proposed Improvements
International Building Code {IBC):
Residential occupancy Type
Wood - Type V Construction Type
Name: Landmark Homes, inc. David Lito«�itz or Larrv
Address: PO Box 26116 r
City/State: Federa! �'ay, WA
zip: 98093-3 1 1 5
Phone:253-927-6I1b
Fax: 253-927-�b5?
Email: dj ito4 � st.net .; �
Signature: � [ ,
� ,t 11f+��
Agent (ifdiffer t th Applicant)
Name: ESM Consuiting Engineers - Stuart Scheuerman
Add�ess: 3391� lst Wat S. Suite ?00
Ciry/State: Federal Way, WA
zip: 9800�
Phone: ?53-838-6 i
Fax: 3-838-710�' ��
Email�tuar�.sc�e er��an.!uesmcivil.com
Owner
�
1VIASTER LAND USE APPLICATION
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
33325 8` Avenue South
PO Box 9718
Federal Way WA 98063-9718
253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609
wtivw.citvoffzderalwav.com
Name: Landmark Homes, Inc. David Litowitz or Larry
Address: PO BoY 26116
c�ryisr�ce_ Federal Way, WA
zip= 9809�-311b
Phone: 253-927-61 i6
Fax: ?�3-927-�6�2
Emai1: �j��rp(�C ast.net P
Signature: �, �
�it�� ��5��
Bulletin #003 — August 18, 2004 Page t of i k�i-IandoutslMaster Land Use Application
EXHIBIT D
Tree Retention, Street Tree, Landseape & Details Pian
See Exhibit A
_ ,..� , ._ _
� ��:_ji'� r'�
�., , r
,;
��� cs� �
y ` _ ....� ..
� ���i � ___ v
° � '�
.� ,�--- �__.,�F�_.� :
;- _ . . � __�_ _ . _.
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat
File No. 08-100330-00-SE
Description: Proposal to subdivide 3.0 acres into a 14-lot single-family subdivision including
infrastructure and stormwater faciliries.
Applicant: Landma.rk Homes Inc., PO Box 26116, Federal Way, WA
Location: SW 352"� Street & 27"` Avenue SW (Pazcel #252103-9026)
Lead Agency: Ciry of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services
Staff Contact: David Lee, Associate Planner, 253-835-2622
The lea.d agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment. An environmenta.l impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was ma.de after review of a cou�leted environmental checklist,
Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, final staff evalua.tion for this action, and other municipal policies,
plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authoriry under the
Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 4331C.060. This inforn�ation is
available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14
days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by August 26, 2009. You ma.y appeal this
detercnina.tion to Greg Fewins, Directar of Communiry Development Services, at the Ciry of Federal
Way (33325 8`� Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Fed.eral Way, WA 980b3-9718) no later than 5:00 p.m
on September 9, 2009. The appeal must be in the form of a written letter sta.ting the reason for the
appeal of the determina.rion. The appeaI letter must make specific factuai objections.
Published in the Federa! Way Mirror on August 12, 2009.
Doe. LD. 51069
� �" z '�� ��� � �✓� � ,_ �� � ax.�,. _ _.._.E. .-.-a.,.
�����_.,��- ��T..�� ��t _k_
• ���
� , � � -
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
33325 8'� Avenue South
PO Box 9718
Federal Way WA 98063-9718
253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609
ww�v_cityoffederalwav.cam
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
PURPOSE OF CHECKLLST
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Revised Code of Washington (RCV� Chapter 43.21C,
requires all govemmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making
decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable
significant adverse unpacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide
infoRnation to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid
impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal.
Govemmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmentat impacts of your proposal
are significant, requiring prepazation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise
information known, or give the best de.scription you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you
should be able to answer the questions from your owr► observations or project plans without the need to
hire experts. ff you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not
knSw" or "does not apply." Complete answers to questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreiine, and landmark designations.
Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist ques�ons apply to all parts of your proposat, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
USE OF CHECKLLST FOR NON- PROIEGT PROPOSALs
Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "dces not
apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non-Project Actions.
For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property
or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affect� geographic area," respectively.
�e�� � a �a � �.,�
���� � � ����
Balletin #O50 — December 22, 2005 Page 1 of 18 k:lHandouts�Enviro ��� �� �
�
�.:.
, �
�`` ,,.� �� . .� �:.` _ .�% � .v.z,� ._.. ,. - .
� !l. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Norpoint Heights Subdivisio�
2. Name of applicant:
Landmark Homes, Inc.
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
PO Box 26116 Federai Way, WA 98093-3116
Contact - David �itowitz at 253-927-6116
4. Date ch�klist prepared:
January 2Q08
5. Agency requesring checklist:
City of Federal Way
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if appiicable):
Summer/fall 2008
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with
this proposal? If yes, explain.
No
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepazed,
direcdy related to this proposal.
There are no known sensitive areas on or around #his site.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other pmposals direcfly
affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
None k�own
Builetin #O50 — December 22, 2005 Page 2 of 18 k:�i Checklist
..: ., ; r
�
_. ,�.,
� .; ,.
� . ��..a� �
�� ��
� �'��.�"� �� .. #..,.�..v.� �� � �_ �� ��
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
From the City of Fede�al Way; SEPA, Preliminary Plat Approval
From the Ciry of Tacorna; Right-of-Way permit, Work Order approval.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the
project and site. There are several quesrions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain
aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
The project is subdividing 3.05 acres (after BLA is finalized with part of the property to the
northj i�to 14 single family residential lots, constructing abaut 500 feet of residential roadway
along with a cul-de-sac. Access wiil be off Norpoint Way within the City of Tacoma. A
pedestrian pathway will be built from the end of #he new road to 25th Ave. SW. Sewer and
water will be instaQed to and though the site. There will be an on-site stormwater quality and
quantity facility discharging to the C+ty of Tacoma.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of
your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. �
If a pmposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide
a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonabty available. While you
should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed
pians submitted with any pemut applications related to tlus checklist.
This project is located just off the new Norpoint Way NE built in no�theast Tacoma a
coupte of years ago, at the curve to the west. IYs in Sec. 25, T.21 N.,R3 E. WM.
There is no address this parcel, but the address next door is 3b210 27th Ave. SW Federal Way,
98023. Parcei number is 252103-9048. This parcel is currently in a BIA land use process at
Federal Way with parcel 252103-9026.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
l. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other.
The site generally has between 0 and 14% grades over the site, sloping from east to west.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Approximetty 14% slope is the steepest on the site.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)? If
you lrnow the classification of agriculturai soiis, specify them and note any prime farmland.
The Pierce County Soils Map indicates the on-site soils are Alderwood gravelly sandy loam.
These soils are moderatety well drained soils, classified as class "C" soils.
Bulietin #O50 — December 22, 2005 Page 3 of 18 k:�tiandouts�Environmental C(ucklist
�
�::
� :_
�, . � �, :
,-- . : ,
�_.� _
< > � ° ;';} ; > ... .,. �. � ��„
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No signs of unstabls s�i!s in this ar�a.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed.
Indicate sour�e of fill.
The preiiminary estimated quantity of grading for the stonn water pond and roadway
is 4500 e.y. of cut and about 50 c.y. of fill.
Most imported materials wilt be for the construction of the roadway. The materials will come
from local gravel pits and asphalt plants.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construccion, or use? If so, generally describe.
Erosion can occur with clea�ing and grading of the site.
Erosion contro! witl be developed using #he City of Federal and KCSWDM guidelines
during the final design phase of the project.
g. About what percent of the site wiil be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction
(for example, asphalt or buildings)?
The overall site has about 3.05 acres. Of this, about 0.63 acres wilt be covered with a
roadway, and about 1.29 ac. will be covered with buildings and driveways (4,000 sf x 14 fots)
for a total of about 1.91 acres or 63% of the site could be covered with impervious surface.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any.
Follow the erosion control guidelines from Federal Way and KCSWDM.
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors,
indushial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give appro�cimate quantities if lmown.
During construction, some dust and equipment emissions woutd be produced. After
construction was finished, only automotive emissions would be produced.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe.
Probably oniy auto emissions from the suROUnding streets
Balletin #O50 — December 22, 2005 Page 4 of 18 k:lHandoutslEnvironmental Checklist
_ �:.
, : : ._, .._ _ _ .�.__ . ...
� , , _-_: : : _ ...e_. �
� '�� ..�4.i' r.�.f__�.�� �,_� � .._.�._,
, ,.�
c. Proposed measures to reduce or controt emissions or other impacts to air, if any.
Th?S�B IS Ii� ����ROSP� t?1$�5��(PS tQ fPCIUC@ efIlISS1O(iS.
3. WATER
a. Surface.
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it fiows into.
There is no water bodies on or around this site.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? ff yes, please describe and attach avaitable plans.
No
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from
surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material.
None are proposed.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No susface water withdrawals or diversions are proposed.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note tocation on the site plan.
There is no 1U0-year floodplains on or nea� this site.
Bulletin �f050 — December 22, 2005 Page 5 of 18 k_1Handouts�Environrnental Checklist
. -�� __ � r.. _ �_ . � - -._____
'_, �
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe
the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No discharge of waste materials are proposed.
b. Ground.
1) Wiil ground water be withdrawn, or wilt water be discharged to groundwater? Give general
description, Qurpose, and approximate quantities if known.
The proposed stormwater fiacilities are a surface water detentionlwetpond faciiity which is
not proposed to infiltrate.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other
sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or
humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
No septic systems are proposed. Sewer will go to Lakehaven Utility District
treatment plant.
c. Water Runoff (including stonnwater)
1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal,
if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe.
The only runoff is frotn this site. Stormwater from this project, roads and homes will flow to
an on-site detentionlwater quality fiaciiity. ARer detention and t�eatment, it will flow into the
City of Tacoma conveyance system starting at the project. This system goes directly to an
outlet at Comme�cement Bay. lt appears this conveyance system was sized for this
development.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe_
No
Bulletin #O50 — December 22, 2005 Page 5 of I8 k:�EIandouts�Environmental Cliecklist
��.
. . . , i -... . i ._....... . _.._..._.�._.... .. ...._. ._
_s ��� � � �
, , �
�`� �, �. �..�"' _.�,a.�.;�.�r_`� � .�_ a � . �-----
,
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any.
The project proposes to provide a level 1 detention facility and a basic water quatity facility,
(wetpond) to mitigate any increase i� runoff from the site.
4. PLANTS
a Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site.
X deciduous tree:
X evergreen tree:
X shrubs
X grass
_ pasture
alder, maple, aspen, other
fir, cedar, pine, other
_ crop or grain
_ wet soil ptants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other
_ water plant_ water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
_ other rypes of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
During the constructain of the roadway and stormwater facilities, only a
few larger trees will be removed along with underbrush, grasses and
other small plant materials_
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
There are no knaw threatened or endangered species on or around
this site.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation
on the site, if any.
A landscape buffer is required along Norpoint Way and around the stonnwater facilties.
Street trees are required along the new street and each new home will have sorne
landscaping around it.
Bulletin #O50 — December 22, 2005 Paae 7 of 18 klHandouts�EnvironmenW Chxklist
� ;
,,. ,
, � • a - 1� , '� .�
, ,���� 4 -...as .y:. ._
5. AN[MALS � E ` 4 �;
a. Cii atiy birus and animais ivhicn t�ave been ubserved un ur near tne site or are known io oe on
or near the site_
birds: hawk, heron, eagle ongbir s ther
mammats: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shelifish, other
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
There are no known #hreatened or endangered species on or
around this site.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? ff so, explain.
ihere is no known migratio� route on or near this site.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any.
tdo proposed mitigation proposed.
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy {electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,
etc.
The proposed new homes are expected to use electric and naturai gas for heating, lights.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
IVo reduced in any solar energy by adjacent properties is expected from this project. This
project is generally lower than most surrounding properties.
Bulletin #O50 — December 22, 2005 Page 8 of 18 k:1FIandouts�Environmental Checklist
,: ; ,
, �"
: �,; j� a f; s-
��°�, a . �, � � _-� �_
_:�,�;�� � :.� t' ,
< � � �� ,_.._±� , ���-,_.� - __
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are inciuded in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy impaccs, if any.
None proposed.
7. ENVIRONMEN'fAL E
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, inctuding exposure to toxic chemicais, risk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
Any project that proposes to develope raw fand could create an environmental hazard
associated with heavy equipment, construction, o� the development of residential
homes.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
No special emergency services are expected to be needed at this site.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any.
No measures proposed.
b. Noise.
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment operation, other)?
Traffic would be #he oniy item, but it shouid not be a major impact.
2) What types and levets of noise wouid be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction operation, other)? Indicate
what hours noise wouid come from the site.
There wili be some short term construction type noise, land clearing, grading, utility, �' -
instailation, etc. Long term there should be minor traffic noise. . "
Bulletin #1050 - t�cember 22, 2005 Page 9 of 18 k:�I-tandoutslEnvironmental Checklist
�fi .:-
-' ! f �3 1 � -� .
a r -` { � � � -'
, � ? -
3) Proposed measures to reduce or controi noise impacts, if any.
No mitigation for noise is proposed except to follaw the City of
Federal requirements.
8_ LAND AND SFIORELINE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The site is currentfy vacant and afte� the BLA wi#h the property to the
north, will stay vacant. There is a power line running though the
site but there is only one pole which is on the site.
The surrounding properties are ail developed with single family homes or
larger apartment buildings_
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No
c. Describe any structures on the site.
As noted above, #here are no home or outbuildings on the existing site
and after the BLA there wili still be no structures on the site.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
�
e. What is the current zoning classifcation of the site?
RS 5.0 and RS 7.2
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
The northe�ly secfion is multi-famiiy and ihe southerly section is sing{e
€amily high density_
Bulletin #O50 - December 22, 2005 Page lfl of 18 k:�Handouts�Environmenta! Checklist
�
� , --- �� __ _
' � �`> � � � `� ,_. � .� .�..�, �, � � y `
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an environmentally criticai area? ff so, specify.
No
i. AQproximateiy how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
An estimated �umber wouid be 14 single fami(y lots x 2.5 persons per lot = 35
people.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any.
None proposed
l. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any.
Since most of the surrounding land has the same use (single family homes) this project
would be compatible.
9. HOUSING
a Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middte, or low-
income housing.
There are 14 single family lots proposed.
They will probably be in the middle to upper income housing.
Bulletin #O50 — December 22, 2005 Page 11 of 18 k:Uiandouts�Environmental Checklist
�'
j _ ..._.
� # �� � � � _._ � �..
_. .� .. S . � �: _ _
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middie, or
low-income housing.
No units wiU be eliminated.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any.
No mitigation measures are proposed for any housing impacts.
1 ' :71��1?4y
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure{s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
Most of the single family homes are expected to be two story, generally around 25 to 30
feet high. Some could be at the maximum height which is 35 feek.
The expecfed exterior building material may be a hardi plank type product.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
The existing residential homes to the east are about the same height or a little higher
then this site, so there may be some change. Residents to the north, south and west are
about the same elevations, but most views should not be impacted.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any.
The proposed homes would be built similar or better than the sunounding homes, reducing
any aesthetic impacts.
11. L[�x1' AtvD Gr�►ttE
a What type of light or glaze will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
There should be very little light o� glare during construction, since construction times are
limited to daylight hours. After construction only {ight from street lights, houses or occasional
vehicles would be apparent.
Bulletin �lO50 — December 22, 2005 Page 12 of 18 k:�HandoutslEnvironmental Checklist
�
� ._. ��. .
°� t :` � � �� � -�
; r ,
_ , . �
� i � + ' s _'•�.� i �. -
->- _ � _ -_.��,�� ��, _ __ _
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazazd or interfere with views?
The light or giare from the finished project is not expec#ed to be a safety hazard
or interfere with any views.
c. What existing off-site sources of (ight or glare may affect your proposal?
No off-site light or glare is expected to affect this project.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any.
No mitigation is proposed to reduce or control light or glare.
12. RECREATION
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Coronado Park is just north of the site and a small part if this pa�ic is along the north
boundary. Madrona Trail, a designated open space is also just northwest of the
site. The BPA trail and other parks are in the vicinity of the project.
b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
f�iL•7
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportuniries
to be provided by the project or applicant, if any.
The project proposes, at least in part, to "pay in lieu" of providing open space as mitiga6on
to reduce or control impact to recreation facilities.
B ulletin #O50 — December 22, 2005 Page i 3 of 18 k:�Handouts�Environmental Checklist
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
_ y
`k � i . ..�.. � . .. _ . _.. � as»-: _ .._._. ...
a Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generaliy describe.
There are no known historic or culturai areas loca#ed on or near this site_
b. Generaily describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance lrnown to be on or next to the site.
There are no landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, or cuitural areas on or around
this site.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any.
There is no proposed mitigation to reduce or controi impacts.
14. TRANSPORTATION
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The project proposes to construct a low voiume residential street with a cul-de-sac near #he end.
This street wifl connect into a newly constructed Norpaint Way NE in the City of Tacoma. See
Plans.
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the
nearest transit stop?
Pierce County Transit has roufe # 61 (Northeast Tacoma) which comes up Norpoint
Way NE to 29th NE and turns either east or west. This is approximatly 1,000 feet
south of this project.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project
eliniinate?
Using two parking spaces per Iot, there wouid be 14 x 2= 28 parking spaces.
Bulletin �f050 — December 22, 2005 Page 14 of 18 k:�Har►douts�Environmental Cfiecklist
�>
�
.�> �.
3. f : � �_ _ �
- _� £ _,�= - _- _
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets,
�ot including driveways? If so, generaliy descrioe (indicate whether public or private).
The proposal is to buiid a locai residentail street with a cul-de-sac near the end_
This road wil! connect ta Norpoint Way NE within the City of Tacoma. Only minor
changes to this road is expected, remove curb/gutterJsidewalk a�d replace with the new
roadway. This new road will be a public road.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity ofl water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generally describe.
No
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known,
indicate when peak volumes would occur.
The proposal is for 14 single family lots. Using a industry standard of 10 trips pe�
single famify iot as a base; 10 x 14 = 140 estimated trips per day.
g. Proposed measures to reduce oc control transportation impacts, if any.
Construct a new roadway per Federal Way Road standards.
15. PUBLiC SERVICES
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public serviees (for e�cample: fire protection,
police protection, health care, sch�ls, other)? If so, generally describe.
There will be an increase in public services for this project. This is a standard residential
development which generally uses all public services, similar #o all residential
developments.
Bnlletin #O50 — De�ember 22, 2005 Page 15 of 18 k:�Handouts�EnvironmenW Checklist
;�
s:
' _ . �
�:.. ,
f � + 3 ,
> .�
�
� , . �.
� -' s� ..a � .;
. . .._.... -..; J
... .� ' .. ... .... .... .�.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
Construct the on-site road system and connect to the existing Norpoint Way
NE streef.
16. U'ra.rr�s
a. Circle utilities currendy availabte at the site:
septic system, other
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility pmviding the service, and the
general consti activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
It appears the majority of the site will be within Tacoma Power Senrice Area, even though an
ovefiead PSE power line goes though the site. Gas is expected to be available to the site.
Water and sewer senrices wil! be supplied by i.akehaven Utility District.
Refuse service comes from Waste Management.
Telephone service comes from several praviders in the ar�a.
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is
relying on them to make its decision.
SIGNATURE:
�t�' �ti"tj
hi.
DATE SUBMIT`TED: � � �' t �
Bulletin #O50 — December 22, 2005 Page 16 of 18 k:�EtandoutslEnvironmental Chec{clist
$�
_ Y 1F'
_ _ , ..._ � �� 1 � .
a� t
�° � r . . ._ ..-. ,,. . . ,.A .^.z.,c-:__ _ "_' _"_'
D. SL`PPLEMEiV'TAL Sf�i+,T c a�2 NaN-'�Rt7JE�7' t'i�'i IaNS
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the iist of the
elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be awaze of the proposa.l, of the types of activities likely to result from
the proposal, and if they are likely to affect the item at a greater intensiry or at a faster rate than if the
proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water, emissions to air; production, storage,
or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Any disturbance to native land could cause an increased discharge to water, emissions to air,
production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, o� produce noise.
This development, similar to most residentia� housing developments, y+ill require the
develapment of roads, u6lities and new homes, which will require the use of power, gas for cars
and other taxic or hazardous produces.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases:
The project will be des+gn, built and managed using current city, state a�d federal standards and
guidelines.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
The project will eventually remove most existing plantsNegetation from the site, which wil! be
replaced with norrnal landscaping around residential homes. Any wildlife animals cuRently
within #he project area wil( be disturbed. Stormwater from the site wil! be directed to on-site
water quantity and quality facilities which wilt help treat the new surface water from this
development which discharges into Commencement Bay. This water treatment wili help
improve #he water quality before it is discharged in#o the marine environrnent.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animais, fish, or marine life:
There are no proposals to protect or conserve plants or animals on the site and the
proposed onsite stormwater facilities wiA help protect fish and marine environment.
3. How would the proposal be likety to deplete energy of natural resources?
The project will likety use energy from natural resources #or heating ofi the homes, operating
vehicles, electrical usage and similar usages normally used in residential communities, all of
which are depleting natural energy resources. Only a national commitment towards the
development of renewable energy resources wil! change this depletion.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and naturat resources:
The homes will likely have all the new high efficiency appliances and built with regulated
insuiation requirements and high affect fumaces and water heaters, which al! help to conserve
energy.
Bulletin #O50 — Dxember 22, 2005 Page 17 of 18 k:�Handouts�Environmentai Checklist
�
� � . �
` �' _ ; r- � �
.-< ,. _� �- .. --- _ _
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally critical areas or azeas designated (or
zl•,gible �r undec study) for guvernmental proteciion; such as parks, wiiderness, wild and scenic rivers,
threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wet(ands, floodplains, or prime
fa�mlands?
This project is a small parce! surrounded by single family developments and apartments_ There is no
environmentally crifical areas on or near this site.
The new residents moving into this new development could likely use or effect off-site environmentai
critical areas.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts:
There are no proposals with this project ko avoid impacts to off-site environmental
critical areas.
5. How would the proposai be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow
or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans.
N/A
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and iand use impacts:
N/A
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and
utilities?
The project is a standard14 lot �esidential subdivision, which wiU have 14 new residents which
wil� eventualty increase demands on transportation, pubiic services and utilities, similiar to
most residential subdivisions.
Proposed measures to reduce of respond to such demands:
This project will pay many mitigation costs, impact fees, surcharges, system development
fees along with many permit fees and finally the new residents will pay property taxes
and other govemment fees for most if not all services.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
This project is expected to be design, built and managed based upon current laws and
protec#+ons with no expec#ed conflicts.
Bulletin #O50 — December 22, 2005 Page I8 of 18 k:�HandoutslEnvironmental Checklist
.=� � ', ,-"�-� , �,
� � --�- / �.� �
�:v;::�.�..�. . _ . � _ _. . �
C�'� a ��' " .<,.5_ .,;� ,�
- -,•,._::.•xsr> .
�� � � � �-s„ Y� ' � . � � r � 1� . . __....,. . .
i
� � �� �� '„�,. .� _, ...w.._�.. � �-� _ <a��.::_......�. --` �
DEPARTMENT OF COMNIUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Staff Evaluation for Environmeatal Checklist
Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat
SW 352 Street & 27 Avenue SW (Parcel #252103-902�
File No: 0&100330-00-SE, Related File No: 08-100329-00-SU
NoTE: The purpose of tIus staff evaluation is to provide a technical staff evaluation af the proposed action; supplement
information contained in the environmental ehecklist and expanded studies; provide tecbnicai inform3tion unavailable to the
applicant; correcf inaccurate inforrrmtiou; aod recomrnend measures to the responsible official to mitigate identified
environmental impacts. Technical reports and attacluuents referenced above rmy not be attached to all copies of this decision.
Copiec of exhibits, reports, attac�tneriFs, or other docurr�nts may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting David Lee,
Associate Planner, 33325 8"' Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, R/A 98063-971 S. Phone: 253-835-2622
I. SUMAit1RY OF PROPOSED ACTION
Proposal to subdivide 3_0 acres into a 14-lot single-family subdivision including infrastructure and
stormwater facilities.
II. GErr�Rai.Irr�o�a�rtorr
Project Name: Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat
Applicant: Landmark Homes Inc., PO Box 26 (15, Federal Way, WA
Agent: ESM Consulting Engineers, 33915 1$` Way South, #200, Federal Way, WA
Location: SW 352° Street & 27`"Avenue SW (Parcel #252103-9026)
Zoning: RS 7_Z 1 RS 5.0
Comp Plan
Designation: Single-Family Residenrial High-Density
The follocving inforn�arion was submitted as part of the application:
1 _ SEPA Checklist
2. Site Plans
3. Title Report
4. Master Land Use Application
5. King County Quarter Section Map
III. REVi�w PROCESs
The proposed action is subject to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review because it does not
meet the exemptions contained in WAC 197-11-800(27).
t
IV. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL _
The applicarion was submitted on Jarivary 22, 20f3838�, `a�id deemed complete on February 21, 2008.
V. REVIEW OF THE ENViRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
The following lists the elements contained within the environmentai checklist submitted for the
proposed facility. The numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbezs � the
environmental checklist_ If sta.ff concurs with the applicant's response, this is so stated. If the
response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is needed,
there is additional staff comment and evaluation.
A. BACKGROUND
1-12. Concur with the checklist.
B. ENVIItONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth:
a-h Concur with the checkIist.
�������
� ��� � ' �1 � _ _ �
..� �
2. Air:
a-c. Concur with the checklist.
3. Water:
a. (1) —(6) Concur with the checklist.
b. (1} —(2) Concur with the checklist.
c. { 1) —(2) Concur with the checklist_
d Concur with the checklist.
4. Plants:
a-d. Concur with the checklist_
5. Animals:
a-d Concur with the checklist.
6. Energy and Natural Resources:
a-c. Concur with the checklist.
7. Environmental Health:
a. (1) —(2) Cancur with the checklist.
b. { 1) —(3) Concur with the checklist.
8. Land and Shoreline Use:
a-d and g-1. Concur with the checklist.
e. The Corr�prehensive Plan designarion of the site is Single-Farmly High-Density.
Staf�Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Page 2
Norpoint Heights Prelinrinary Plat File Na 08-104330-W�FJn.� i.� s�m�
f. Concur with the checklist.
9. Housing:
a-c. Concur with the checklist.
10. Aesthetics:
a_ Concur with the checklist.
y ��
,,,
` � :r., ; : ;
� � �, __._. � . ,.- ._._
' � ���,.� � �� �J � �;~
....�,__s s..d,u_
b. The height limit for this zone is 30 feet above average building elevarion All new
single-family homes would be limited to this height maximum
c. Concur with the checklist.
11. Light and Giare:
a-d. Concur with the checklist_
12. Recreation:
a-c. Concur with the checklist.
23. Historic and Cultural Preservation:
a-c_ Concur with the checklist.
14. Transportation:
a-g. Concur with the checklist.
15. Public Services:
a-b. Concur with the checklist.
16. Utilities:
a-b. Concur cvith the checklist.
VI. CONCLUSION
The praposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse irr�act on the environment
pursuant to a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS). This DNS is based. on impacts identified
�vithin the environmental checklist, attachments, and the above Staff Evaluation for Environmental
Checklist, and is supported by plans, policies, and regularions formally adopted by Federal Way for
the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions.
The Ciry reserves the right to review any future revisions or alterations to the proposal to determine
the environmental significance or nonsignificance of the proposal at that time.
Prepared by: David Lee, Associate Planner
StatrEvaluation for Environmental Checkiist
Norpoint Heights Prelirr�nary Plat
Date: August 12, 2009
Page 3
File No: 08-100330-00-SFJu.x �.n sioT�
�� ,��
_ _ ".
�` , . -
�•_;. � ':; -
a a 3 > --- -----
t ry �.�� yf � F + -� �.; � ��£ 'Y
� 4 i qcs�t #.~ ....�y...v-,.. �. �< i zae,.... t � ".
' .? ..�_-.
i ' ' ' � ■
SUBDIYISIOH
PreGminary Technical Information Report
Dec�mber 2007
Rerised: June 26. 2009
Prepa�ed for
Landmark Homes, inc.
PO Box 26116
Federal Way, WA 98039
Submitted by
ESM Consutting Engineers. LLC
33915 i�` Way South. Suite 200
Federal Way. WA 9�03
253.838.6113 tei
253.838.7104 fax
-+���,���� s � t �-��
i, � 7/ :
r �- __ � �.. � . _ www.esmcivil.com
,-ti�-, � �� �.?�F��L L"J�Y
'7 i.'1 i i !_.` '. �: _.. �. � �"
a
� ..� k� —
� . e � __.. _
€ ' �r< � .� �.',� _�d� � ' � _ _ __ -!� .— —_
�:�
TECHNIC14L IMFORMATiON REPORT
FOR
tVorpoint Heights Subdivision
Prepared for:
Landmark Homes Inc.
PO Box 26116
Federal Way, WA 98093-3116
Prepared by:
ESM Consuiting Engineers
33915 7 Way South, Suite 204
Federai Way, YJA 98003
0
June 26, 2009
Approved By:
Job No.1453-002-007
City o# Federal Way Date
� �.
�;, � , ��` _. �_' :�-:
TABLE OF' CONTENTS ' �'`" _ -. - �, . g �. ' .
1. PROJECT OVERVIEW............_......_..�._.._...._�.........._...__..._._._.._......_........�........_._......_....._...._.......__..__...._..�.. 1-i
Project Overview
Vicinity Map {Figure 1)
Review of 8 Core Requirements and 5 Special Requirement of 1998 KCSWDM
Summary
Overall Summary of Mitigation
Basin Map
Soils Map
2. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY......._............_......._.._......_._.......__._._�._._.__.._.....�....._�._.. 2-1
3. OFF SITE ANALYSiS.........__...._._._.......�_.._._.._._...
Off-Site Analysis
Figure III - A, Basin Map
Figure III - B, Downstream Flow Path
Figure 111- C, Conveyance System
Pipe Summary Sheet
3-1
4. WATER QUANTIIY & QUALfTY FACILITY ANALYSIS AIVD DESIGN......__._._...._._........ 4-1
Water Quantity Design
Water Qualiry Design/Worksheet
5. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STl1DIES..._ ............._.._...�...__...._.....�._.._.._._...._._.�.._.�.___..._.....__.._._�.... 5-i
Geotechnical Report
6. ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN.._.�__...._.._ ........................_.._.�......_........_.�.._.._._�...__..._..___._....�........._....._ 6-1
Erosion Control Plan
,.- ,
SECTION I
PROJECT OVERVIEW
�
�' � F -�� . --- -_�� __
The Norpoint Heights Subdivision is located west of 25th Avenue SW, south of SW
352" Street, east of Norpoint Way in Tacoma and bordering the King County and
Pierce County line. The north side of the property abuts residential developments and a
small park. The east side of the property abut a residential subdivisions, the south side
abuts a single family home and a apartmen# complex and west sides abuts Norpoint
Way NE located within the City of Tacoma, Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 3
East.
The project contains just over 3 acres. The site does not have any buildings #o remove.
It is currently covered with heavy underbrush and trees. There is one power pole on the
site which is in a 50 foot wide power line easement. The prope�ty generafly slopes in a
wes#erly direction, with slopes generally around 14 percent or less on the site. The
access to the site will come from Norpoint Way NE in Tacoma, with an interior road
probably named SW 353rd St.
The proposal is to develop 14 single-family residential iots add an access road with
curb, gutter and sidewalks off Norpoint Way, and add a pedestrian access to 25fh
Avenue SW The sanitary sewer and water witl come from Lakehaven Utility District.
There is a sma11 sewer pump station near the northwest corner of this site which this site
will utilize. Access will be from an existing utility easement. Water will run though the
site, firom south to north, connecting to an existing water system aiong the south
property line and running north though the site and extending #hough an existing park
over to 25th Ave. SW. �
The site is loca#ed within Federal Way's "Lower Puget Sound" drainage basin. The
entire site will flow to a combination detention water quality facility be#ore discharging to
the City of Tacoma's conveyance system which discharges straight down Norpoint Way
to Commencement Bay. The system design will be guided by both the City of Federal
Way and the City of Tacoma stormwater design guidelines.
Both jurisdictions generally allow continuous rainfall runoff modeling, which since the
site is in King County, will be KCRTS along with other requirements set forth in the 1998
King County Surface Water Design Manua! (KCSWDM) and in the 2003 City o# Tacoma
Surface Water Management Manual. A water quality facility will be part of the detention
pond creating a combined detention wetpool facility using the requiremen#s set forth in
the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manuaf (KCSWDM). This site is in the City
of Federal Way's Basic Water Quality Area. The downstream conveyance system will
be analysis using the 2003 Ci#y of Tacoma Surface Water Management Manual, which
in this case wifl be the rational method.
See Section IH for Overall Summary of Conclusions a�d Proposed Mitigation
1-1
� + ��
�r��� ;�
�'�;4
�� ��
µ�, -,: ,
, q �. , ,,�
� � A ^' '3
4 �{
� �� �
b v.� G
�.�.� � � r�
� .w�..�. �
�, � �..
»�.�a
�� �.
�,..� � .«�
0
:
m
ao
� d
` c � c
r
0� ` �a m
'" 'o N
� ° u
�$ 0 4 w
„°'
m ,� e a
A [J� O 0.
� ;;, x
ay �041
a'G y m
N ~ C �
� '�
e .� J �
� � N p Y! N
� � N 'r �--�
� g z � ti °
�� n
,� o C'
O
� ^ . �
DESCRIPTIONS OF TNE SflILS
This section describes the soii se�ies and map-
ng units in the King County Area. Each soii
ries is desc�ibed and then each mapping unit in
:hat sezies. Unless it is specifically mentioned
�thenaise, it is to be assumed that what is stated .
�out the soil series holds true foY the mapping
;its in that series. Thus, to get fuli infozmation
3bout any one mapping unit, it is necessary to read
�oth the description of the mapping unit ar►d the
:scription of the soil series to which it belongs.
An important part of the description of each
soii series is the soii pz•ofile, that is, the
sequence of layezs from the surface downNa=d to
�ck or other underiying material. Each se�ies
�ntains two descriptions of this profile. The
first is brief and in tenns famiiiar to the layman.
The second, detailed and in technical tezms, is for
:ientists, engineer•s, and others who need to make
�oraugh and precise studiss of soils. Unless it
is othezwise stated, the colozs given in the
descriptions aze those of a moist soil_
As mentioned in the section "How This 5urvey tYas
ade," not a31 mapping units are members of a soil
series. Urban land, for example, does nat belong
to a soii series, but nevertheless, is listed in
�Iphabetic ozder along with the soil se�ies.
Foilowing the name of each mapping unit is a
symbol in parentheses. This symbol identifies the
mapping unit on the detailed soil map. L•isted at
he end of each description of a mapping unit is the
apability unit and woodland group in which the
mapping unit has been placed, The woodland desig-
nation and the page for the description o£ each
apability unit can be found by refer=ing to the
Guide to hiapping Units" at the back of this survey.
The acreage and pYOportionate extenfi of each
mapging unit are shown in table 1. Many of the
:erms used in describing soils can be found in the
:lossazy at the end of this suavey, and moze de-
�ailed infarmation about the tenninology and methods
af soil mapping can be obtained fxom the Soil Su=vey
lanuai (19j ,
Alderwaod Series
The Aldezwood series is made up of moderateiy
�ell dz•ained soils that have a weakly consolidated
io strongly consolidated substratum at a depth of
24 to 40 inches. These soils aze on uplands• I'heY
:ozmed undez conifers, in glacial deposits. Slopes
ire 0 to 70 percent. The annual pY•ecipitation is
35 to 60 inches, most of which is rainfa3i, between
October and i�a.y. The mean annual air temperature is
ibout 50 F. The frost-#ree season is 150 to 200
iays. Elevation ianges from 1Q0 to 800 feet.
in a zepZ•esentative profile, the surface layea
and subsoil are very dazk bzotivn, dark-brown, and
;rayish-brown gravelly sandy ioam about 27 inches
thick. The substiaturn is grayish-brown, weakly
consolidated to strongly consolidated glacial till
that extends to a depth of 60 inches and more.
Alden�ood soils are used for timber, pasture,
b�nies, row crops, and urban deveiopment. They
sie the most extensive soils in the survey area.
� Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, b to 15 percent
siapes (AgC)---This soil i5 roli2ng_ Areas are
irregular in shape and range from 10 to about 600
acres in size.
Representative pzvfile of Alderwood gravelly
sandy ioam, 6 to i5 percent slopes. in woodland,
450 feet east and 1,30U feet south of th� nozth
quarter corner of sec. 15, T. 24 N., R. 6£.:
Ai--O to 2 inches; very daxk brokm {lOYR 2/2)
gravelly sandy loam, dark grayish brown
(lOYR 4/2) dry; weak, fine, gianular struc-
ture; slightly hard, friable, nonsticky,
nonplastic; many roats; strongly acid;
abrupt, wavy boundary. 1 to 3 inches thick.
B2--Z to 12 inches, dazk-brown (lOYR 4/3) graveiiy
sandy loam, bro«r► (IOYR 5/s") dry; moderate,
medium, subangular blocky structuZe; siightly
hard, friable, nonsticky, nonplastic; many
roots; strongly acid; clear, wavy boundary.
9 to 19 inches thick.
B3--12 fio 27 inches, grayish-brown (2.SY 5/2)
gra�telly sandy loam, light gray (2,5Y 7/Z)
dry; many, medium, distinct mottles of light
olive bra+�ri (2_SY 5/6); hard, friable, non-
sticky, nonplastic; many ioots; medium acid;
abrupt, wavy boundary. 12 to 23 inches thick.
IIC--27 to b0 inches, grayish-brown (2.5Y 5/2),
iaeakly to strongiy consolidated till, light
gray (Z.SY 7/2) dry; common, medium, distinct
mottles of light oiive brown and yellowish
bzown (2.SY 5/6 and lOYR 5/6); massive; no
roots; medium acid_ Many £eet thick.
The A hoYizon ranges from veYy dark brawn to
dark brown. 7he B horizon is dark biown, gzayish
bzot�m, and dark yellowish brown. The consolidated
C hoiizon, at a depth of 24 to 40 inches, is mostiy
grayish brown mottied with yellowish brown. Some
layess in the C hozizon 51ake in water. In a few
areas, there is a thin, gzay oi grayish-brown A2
horizon. In most areas, this horizon has been
destroyed through logging operations.
Soils included with this soil in napping make up
no more than 30 percent of the total acreage. Some
areas are up to 3 percent the poorly drained Nozma,
Beilingham, Seattle, Tuk�aila, arid Shaicar soils;
some aie up to S percent the vezy gravelly Everett
and Neilton soils; and some are up to 15 percent
Aiderwood soils that have slopes more gentie or
steeper than b to 15 pezrent, Some areas in New-
castle Nills are 25 percent Beausite soils, sane
northeast of Duvall axe as much as 25 percent Ovall
soils, and some in the vicinity of Dash Point are
1Q percent Indianola and Kitsap soiis. Also
included are sa►aIl areas of Aldezwood soils that
have a gravelly loam surface layer and subsoil_
8
t .: . : , . ..� f � � � . -_-:- .:� _ _ _ . _
�"`_ � �� � _ � ::� � �—�--�� � _ _..__ ...
Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface
layei and subsoil and ve=y slow in the substratum_
Roots penetrate easily to the consalidated substra-
tum where they tend to mat on the surface. Some
roots entez the substratum thr�ough cracks. Water
moves on top of the substratum in wintez. Avaiiabie
water capacity is lo�a. Rvnoff is slola to mediwn,
and the hazard of ezosion is moderate.
This soii is used for timber, pasture, berries,
and row crops, and for urban development. Capability
unit IVe-2; tiaoodland group 3di.
Aiderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent
slopes (AgBj.--Thas soil is nearly level and
undulating. It is similar to Aldenaood gravelly
sandy loam, b to 15 percent slopes, but in places
its suxface layez is 2 to 3 inches thicker. Areas
are iriegular in shape and z•ange from 10 acres to
slightly more than 600 aci�es in size.
Some areas are as rm�ch as 15 percent included
Norma, Bellingham, Tukwila, and Shalcar soils, all
of which aze poorly drained; and some areas in the
vicinity of Enumclaw axe as much as 10 percent
Buckley soils,
Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is
slight.
This Aldenaaod soil is used for timber, pasxure,
berries, and row crops, and for vrban development.
Capability i.mit IVe-2; woodland group 3d2.
Alderwood graveliy sandy loam, 1S to 30 percent
slopes (AgD).--Depth to the substratum in this soil
varies within short distances, but is commonly
about 40 inches. Areas aze elongated and Zange
from 7 to abaut 250 acres in size.
Soils included with this soil in mapping make
up no more than 38 percent of the tatal acreage.
S�►e areas are up ta 25 percent Everett soils that
have slopes of 15 to 30 pex•cent, and some areas are
up to 2 percent Bellingham, No=ma, and Seatt3e soils,
which are in depxessions. Some azeas, especaally
on 5quak Mountain, in Newcastle Hills, and north of
7igez Mountain, are 25 percent Beausite and Ovall
soils. Beausite soils are underlain by sandstone,
and Ovall soils by andesite.
Rvnoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is
severe, The siippage potentiai is moderate.
This Aiderwooc3 soi2 is used mostly fox timber.
Some aTeas on the lower parts af slopes are used
for pasture. Capability unit VIe-2; woodland group
3d1.
Alde=wood and kitsap soils, very steep (AkF).--
This mapping unat as about Sfl percent Alderwood
gravelly sandy loam and 25 percent Kitsap siit
loam, Slopes are 25 to 70 pezcent. Distzibvtian
of the soils vazies greatly within shozt distances.
About 15 percent of some mapped areas is an
inciuded, unnamed, vezy deep, moderateiy coarse
textu�ed soii; and about 10 percent of some a=eas
is a very deep, coazse-textured indianola soil.
Drainage and pezmeability vary. Runoff is =apid
to veiy rapid, and the erosion hazazd is severe to
very severe. The slippage potential is seveze.
'fhese soiis are used for timber, Capability
unit VIie-1; woodland gaoup 2d1.
10
Arents, Alder�vood Mateaial
Arents, Alden000d material consists of Alderwood
soils that have been so disturbed through uiban-
ization that they no longe7 can be classified with
the Aldertvood series. These soils, however, have
many similaa featu7•es. The upper pazt of the soil,
to a depth af 20 to 40 inches, is b=own to dark-
biown graveliy sandy loam_ Below this is a grayish-
brown, consolidated and impervious substratum.
Slopes generally range from 0 to 15 percent.
These soils aze used for urban development,
Arents, Aldenvood mateiial 0 to 6 percent sla es
(Am8).--in many areas thas soil is levei, as a
result of shaping during construction foi urban
facilities, Areas are rectangulaz in shape and
zange from 5 acres to about 400 acres in size.
Rep=esentative profile of A�ents, AldeYwood
mateaial, 0 to 6 percent slopes, in an urban area,
1,300 feet w�st and 3�D feet south of the northeast
corner of sec. 23, T. 25 N., R_ S E.:
0 to 26 inches, dark-brown (lOYR 4J3) gzavelly
sandy loam, pale b7own (lOYR 6J3) dry;
massive; slightly hard, very fziable, non-
sticky, nonplastic; many roots; medium acid;
abrupt, smooth boundary. 23 to 29 inches
thi ck .
26 to 6D inches, grayish-brb►on {2.SY S/2) weal:ly
consoiidated to strong3y consolidated glacial
till, light bro�mish g7ay (2.SY b/2) dry;
common, medi�nn, pr�ominent mottles of yellowish
brown (lOYR SJ6) moist; massive; no roots;
mediwn acid. l�tany feet thick.
The upper, very friable pait of the soii extends
to a depth of 20 to 4Q inches and ranges from dark
grayish brown to dark ye3lowish brown.
Sorne areas are up to 30 percent included soi2s
that are similar to this soil material, but either
shallower or deeper over the compact substratum;
and some areas are 5 to 10 percent very gravelly
Everett soils and sandy Indianola soils.
This Arents, Alderwood soi3 is �oderately well
diained. Permeability in the upper, distuibed soil
material is moderately rapid to modeY•ately slow,
depending on its compactian during construction.
The substratum is very slowly permeable.. Roots
penetrate to and tend to mat on the surface of the
consolidated substratum. Some rvots enter the
subsxratum th7augh crac3:s. lYater moves vn top af
the subst�atwn in winter_ Available watez• capacity
is low. Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is
siighx.
This soil is used for uiban development. Ca_
pability unit IVe-2; woodland group sd2.
Arents, Aidenuood material, 6 to 15 peacent
slopes (Aa�C),__This so�l has convex slopes. Areas
are rectangular in shape and range fzom 10 aczes ta
about 450 acYes in size.
� ' , f _ �;
s,. �:-�� ,t'� , ;'
� ' �' • � � �� , _
� �"`� �,� � �..-,r.�,...�., .'�, � � E'
�.:` .. . _. _ _ .
REVlEW OF STORMWRTER REQUIREMENTS FRONf
CiTY OF FEDERAL WA,Y AND THE CITY OF TACOMA
Since this project is within the City of Federai Way but discharges stormwater to the City
of Tacoma's system, this review wiil focus on both Cities' stormwater manuals. The City
of Federal Way follows the 1998 KCSWDM, which has eight core requirements and �ve
special requirements. The City of Tacoma's 2003 Surface Water Management Manual
has ten minimum requirements and two additional requirements.
KCSWDM - Core ReQUirement No. 1- Discharae at the Natural Location
TSWMM - Minimum Requirement No. 4- Preservation of Natural DrainaAe
Svstems and Outfalls
City of Federal Way:
The entire site drains west to the City ofi Tacoma under existing and proposed
conditions. It will drain to an existing conveyance system which flows straight south in
Norpoint Way all the way to Commencement Bay.
City of Tacoma:
The entire site generally drains west eventually discharging to a catch basin at the start
of the City of Tacoma's stormwater conveyance system in Norpoint Way. Flows stay in
the City of Tacoma and continue in a conveyance system to Commencement Bay.
KCSWDM - Core Rectuirement No. 2- Offsite Analvsis
TSWMM - Additional ReQUirement No. 1- Off-Site Analvsis and MitiAation
City of Federal Way:
"All proposed projects must submit an offsite analysis report that assesses potential
offsite drainage impact associated with deveiopment of the project site and proposes
appropriate mitigation of those impacts." (See Section 111 of this report)
City o# Tacoma:
Since the site flows to Tacoma, this submittal includes a downstream analysis as
described in Vofume 1'I 1 Chapter 4 of the City of Tacoma's Surface Water management
Manual. (See Section I11 of this report, Offsite Analysis, for this information).
KCSWDM - Core Reauirement No. 3- Flow Control
TSINMM -Additional Reauirement No. 7- Flow Contro!
City of Federal Way:
The flow control facility will be located within the City of Federal Way. Based on the City
of Federal Way standards, #he proposed onsite improvements {buildings, driveways and
the private access road) will introduce more than 10,000 square feet of new impervious
area; therefore, onsite storm water flow controi is required. The project wouid propose
1-5 ;:
��_ _ �`_
�„ �_.
to design a detention pond to a Level 1 Fiow Controi standard as set forth in the 1998
KCSWDM.
City of Tacoma:
Although the flow control facility will be located in the City of Federal Way, it will
discharge to the City of Tacoma's conveyance system; therefore the flow control needs
to be designed with this in mind. Per the TSWMM, Figure 3-4, the proposed onsite
improvements (buildings, driveways and the private access road) will introduce more
than 10,000 square fee# of effective impervious area; but not to Leach Creek or Flett
Creek Watershed, nor does it discharge to fresh water. It does not discharge to an open
system so a qualitative downstream analysis in required. (See downs#ream analysis)
This analysis indicates that #he existing conveyance system will confain the design
flows, so flow control, per the City of Tacoma may not be required. However, since it is
in Federal Way, it is required. The p�oject proposes to design a detention pond using a
"continues rainfalirunoff modeling", which, since the site is in King County, will be
KCRTS. It will discharge at a Level 1 per the KCSWDM, which means it matches the
existing site conditions 2 and 10 year peaks.
KCSWDM - Core Requirement tdo. 4- Convevance Svstem
TSWMM - Additionai ReQuirement No. 1- Off-Site Analvsis
City of Federal Way:
"All engineered conveyance system elements for proposed projects must be anaiyzed,
designed and constructed to provide a minimum fevet of protection against ove�topping,
flooding, erosion, and structural failure as specified".
The City of Federa! Way's conveyance requirements for a new system are per Section
1.2.4.1. The conveyance sys#em must be designed with sufficient capacity to convey
and contain (at a minimum) the 25-year storm peak fiow, assuming developed
conditions for onsite tributary areas and existing conditions for any offsite tributary
areas. The means to check the capacity of the proposed conveyance system for the
Norpoint Heights Subdivision was Table 3.2, page 3-10 of the 1998 KCSWDM. Insofar
as the project Natural Discharge Area is less than 10 acres and the majority of the
tributary area is detained, the King County Runoff Time Series {KCRTS) with 15-minute
time steps runoff computation method will be used for the capacity analysis of the site.
The new conveyance system analysis and design wii! be done during the final stage of
#his project.
City of Tacoma:
The City of Tacoma's conveyance requirements for a new system are per Volume 111,
Chapter 4. All public and private pipe systems less than 24 inches in diameter shal! be
designed to convey the 10-year 24-hour peak #low rate without surcharge.
All conveyance systems sha11 be designed for the ful!-developed conditions. The fully
developed conditions fior the project site shal! be derived from the percentage of
proposed and existing impervious area. For off-site tributary areas, typical percentage o#
�, ,, E ,
£ ;r :
i -6 �� ; ' f - � `� °. ,. � �.
� � _'- . � ., _ _ _ . _ �: _. .:� �,,
impervious area for fully developed conditions is provided in Table 4.1. Conveyance
systems shall be modeled as if no detention is provided upstream.
KCSWDM - Core Reuuiremenfi No 5- Temporarv Erosion and Sedimentation
Control
TSWMM - Minimum Requirement No. 2- Construction Stormwater Pollution
Prevention
Will apply during the final design review.
KCSWDM - Core Requirement No. 6- Maintenance and Operations
TSWMM - Minimum ReQuirement No. 10 - Operation and Maintenance
Will apply during #he final design review.
KCSWDM - Core Rectuirement No. 7- Financiai Guarantees and Liabilitv
TSWMM - Additional l�equirement No. 2- Financial Liabilitv
Will apply during the final design review.
KCSWDM - Core Requirement No. 8- Water Quality
TSWMM - Minimum Requirement No. 6- Runoff Treatment
Since this project is in the City of Federal Way, but discharges to the City of Tacoma, it
needs to be developed for both jurisdictions. It appears both will accept a combined
detentionlwetpond facility.
City of Federal Way:
All proposed projects must provide water quality (WQ) facifities to treat the runoff from
new and/or replace pollution-generating impervious surFaces and pollution-generating
pervious surfaces. The site is located within a Basic Water Quality Treatment Area as
ident�ied on the City of Federal Way Water Quality Applications Map. -
City of Tacoma:
The following projects require construction of stormwater treatment fiacilities (See Table
3.1
TSWMM)
Projects in which the total of the effective pollution-generating impervious surFace
{PG1S) is 5,000 square feet or more in a#hreshold discharge area of #he project, or
Projects in which the total of pollution-generating pervious surface (PGPS) is three-
quarters {3/4) ofi an acre or more in a threshold discharge area, and from which there is
a surface discharge in a natural or man-made conveyance system from the site.
}.r, °:,;
� � �,
� � � � ____- �_ ,_
1-7 � a yy
, � .s:.. . �.�.
.. �
� : `
�.�
� .... _ ,. �+�. : . _ .. . .
The Norpoint Heights Subdivision proposal will utilize the proposed combined
detention/wetpool #acility as mitigation for water quality.
KCSWDM -Special Requirement No. 1- Other Adopted Area-Specific
Requirements
No other speci�c requirements are known for this site.
KCSWDM -Special Requirement No. 2- Fioodplain/Floodwa-- Detineation
The 100-year Flood Plain does not enter this site.
KCSWDNi -Specia! Requirement No. 3- Flood Protection Facilities
This requiremen# does not apply since the project is outside any defined floodpiains.
KCSWDIIA —Special Requirement No, 4- Source Controls
"Water quality source controls prevent rainfall and runoff from coming into contact
with pollutants, thereby reducing the likelihood that pollutants wili enter public
waterways and violate water quality standards." A combined detention and wetpool
facility is �roposed for water quali#y treatment of runoff from the paved surface
subject to vehicular traffic, prior to discharge into the downstream public drainage
system.
KCSWDM -Speciai Rectuirement No. 5- Oil Cont_rol
After reviewing Section 1.3.5 ofi the KCSWDM, this site will not be classified as a
high use site, and oil control will not be required.
TSWMM - Minimum Requirement No. 1- New Developrnent
All new development shall be required to comply with Minimum Requirement # 2. In
addition, new development that exceeds certain thresholds shail be required to
comply with additional minimum requirements as follows:
The following new development sha11 comply wi#h Minimum Requirements #'i
through #5:
Crea#es or adds 2,000 square feet, or greater, of new, replaced, or new plus
replaced impervious surFace area, or
Has iand disturbing activity of 7,000 square feet or greater.
In addition to complying with the Minimum Requirements #1 through #5, the
fioliowing new deveiopment sha9i compiy witi� Minimum �equirements # 6 through
10. ,
�
, . , .
, �= :-_. �.�� _
�—$ �� 4 r
� ,� f.
; }
. .
._ � .
�...:� _ a : : --- _
Creates or adds 5,000 square fee#, or more, of new impervious surface area,
or
or
Converts % acres, or more, of native vegetation to lawn or landscaped area,
Converts 2.5 acres, or more, of native vegetation to pasture.
The � Norpoint Heights Residential Subdivision proposal will utiiize a combined
detention and wetpool facility as mitigation for stormwater impacts.
TSWMM -Minimum Requirement No 2- Const. Stormwater Poflution Prevention
SWPP
All new developments and redevelopments shall comply with Construction SWPP
Elements # 1 through 12. These requirements will apply during the final design
review.
TSVl�M1V� - IViinimum Rec�uirement Nc. 3-�ource Control of Follution
A!i known availabie and reasonable source control BMP's shall be applie� to all
projects. Source ccr#rol BMP's sha11 be selected, designed, and maintained according
to this manual.
These requirements wiN apply during the final design review.
TSWMM - Minimum Rec�uirement No. 5- On-Site Stormwater Manaaement
The infiltration and disposal systems described in this Minimum Requirement shall oniy
be used with the pre-approva! of the City.
The soifs under the Norpoint Heights Project are Alderwood soils which are generally
not too good for infiitration systems. No infiitration sys#ems are proposed,
TSWMM - Minimum Requirement No. 8- Wetland Protection
The Norpoint Heights site does not contain any recorded wetlands.
TSWMM - Minimum Reuuirement No. 9- Basin Planning;
No geographic speci�ic requirements are known to exist downstream of this project.
j ��
..
t � % k � -" � �:.:.. � . ' �?
. .� _ , �qW. - �. . ���. _. ' _.
1-9
SUMMARY
Since this site is within the City of Federal Way but access and stormwater discharges
to the City of Tacoma, any design would have to accommodate the requirements of
both jurisdictions. The standards established for the two jurisdictions are similar enough
to provide an acceptable design for both Cities.
The stormwater runoff from the project site will be collected from the access road, roof,
grass and landscaped areas, and conveyed through a pipe system to a combined
detention wetpond facility and then discharge to the City of Tacoma conveyance
system.
OVERALL SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS & PROPOSED MiTIGATION
The summary of Section II! "Off-Site Analysis", within this TIR indicates this system is
adequate for the discharge from the proposed combined detention /wet pond facility
design using the leve! 1 design parameters. No other mitigation is proposed.
Soils Information
The King County Soits Survey by the US Soils Conservation Service (1973)
generalizes the soils in the vicinity of this project as Alderwood Series; AgC. These
soiis are made up o# mostly poorly draining soils that have a weakly consolidated to
strongly consolidated substratum at a depth of 24 to 40 inches.
„_ �
.__ __--
1-10 : , � � � � ...._.�
- � .� - _ t . _ - �' _:�� _.. ___
SECTION Il
PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY
There are no preliminary conditions yet.
�` � � = a
2-1 � , s g ., � ' '. -
� - . �:n.� _ �
SECTION Ili
OFFSITE ANALYSIS
This off-site review will follow both the City of Federal Way and City of Tacoma
guidelines.
Citv of Federal Wav:
(This portion foNows the KCSWDM)
The following is a Preliminary Level I Downstream Analysis, which looks at the drainage
system 1/4 mile downstream of the site along with the five tasks outlined under the
Level I Downstream Anaiysis. (See Overall Drainage Map in Appendix).
The five Tasks are: Task 1- Study Area Definition and Maps
Task 2 - Resource Review
Task 3 - Field Inspection
Task 4- Drainage System Description and Problem Screening
Task 5 — Mitigation
Task 9- Study Area Defini#ions and Maps
See Figure 111 - A within this report is an overall map showing the project site and the
downstream drainage path going south.
Task 2 - Resource Review
Since the site discharges to the City of Tacoma a review of their downstream sys#em
was conducted. From this review, flows go immediately into a conveyance system
which goes directly to main storm line which goes directly to Commencement Bay.
There is no area which wili have adverse affects or probiems downstream of the project
site.
Task 3 - �ie/d /nspecfion
A site inspec#ion was conducted on 11-30-07 of the downstream system and the study
area. The inspection revealed that this area is generaily a mixture of oider homes with
some newer homes and developments scattered through-out the study area. Starting at
the Pierce County/King County line, any flows would generally sta�t in the new
conveyance system built with the new Norpoint Way roadway improvements jus# a
couple of years ago in the City of Tacoma. Flows will stay within this closed conveyance
system for the entire 1/4 mile downstream review, and on to Commencement Bay.
Task 4- Drainage Sysfem Description and Problem Screening
At the end of this proposal in Norpoint Way there is a new storm system built with this
new road. The system siaris wit� a coupie of catch basins on either side of the new
3-1
�:� ��
y � �
3 .�:
. " ��
��;
.,�... _ -
road. From these catch basins there are 8" storm lines going no�therly to a Type 2
manhole. From this manhole there is a new 10" main storm line running in a northwest
direction to a second type 2 manhole. A 12" line continues in a westerly direct to a cast-
in-place manhole over an existing 36" storm line. This line runs in a north-sou#h
direction. Flows go south in this 36" main line to 29th Street NE were it turns east over
to Norpoint Way were it turns again and continues south in Norpoint Way .
Task 5 — Mitigation
Since there are no known drainage issues with the downstream system, the proposed
mitigation would be to foNow Federal Way's "Level 1" detention and their "Basic" water
quality requirements in #he 1 998 KCS WDM.
Citv of Tacoma:
(This portion follows the TSWMM)
The following is a Qualitative Analysis under "Additional Requirement #1 - Off-Site
Analysis and Mitigation" as defined in the TS WMM, page 3-33.
This Quantitative Analysis has five tasks that are:
Task 3- Define and map the study area,
Task Z- Review a11 available information on the study area,
Task 3- Field inspect the study area,
Task 4- Describe the drainage system, and its existing and predicted
problems through observations and hydraulic modeling o# the City
specified design s#orm event descr�bed in Chapter 4 Volume III.
Task 1-Defrne and Map the Study Area
See Figure 111 - B within this report represents an overall map showing #he project site
and the downstream drainage path going generally south. This map generaHy shows
the drainage basins that flow into this system. The study area is generally residential
with a few roads.
Task 2- Review a!{ available information on the study area.
A review of the available infiormation was conducted within the Ci#y of Tacoma Surface
Water Management Manual along with the City of Tacoma's Public Works web site.
Per the TSWMM, this area is within the "Northeast Tacoma" watershed area, which on
page 2- 93 describes this area as genera8y residen#ial with open spaces and
undeveloped land. Most of this watershed discharges directiy to Commencement Bay.
The sub-basin this project flows to discharges directly to Commencement Bay.
Flow control requirements, as defined in this section, call for projects which do no#
discharge to a creek or gulch, which would include this project, but are instead piped all
3-2
�_ . � _
� ° ..,. .� .�, � .
the way to a marine outfali, require an offsite anaiysis for capacity. {This is done unde�
Task 4) This section also indicates that none of the stormwater discharges in this area
are to fish bearing streams. This would indicate that enhanced treatment for water
quality is not required.
Task 3- Field lnspect the study area.
A site inspection was conducted on 11-30-07 of. the downs#ream system and the
study area. The inspection revealed that this area is generaily a mixture of older
homes with some newer homes and developments scattered th�oughout the study
area.
Starting at the Pierce County/King County line, any flows would generally start in the
new conveyance system built with the new Norpoint Way roadway improvements
just a couple of years ago in the City of Tacoma.
F1ows wi11 stay within this ciosed conveyance system for �the entire ?4 mile
downstream review, and on to Commencement Bay.�
The enclosed conveyance sys#em generally starts at the new access road for #his
Norpoint Heights Subdivision. Flows continue in a northwest direction until it enters the
main 36" line running north/south in 59"' Ave. NE . NE. F1ows continue flowing south in
59"' Ave . NE until it reaches 29& St. E. where it turns east and then south again in
Norpoint Way NE. Flows stay in Norpoint Way NE almost all the way to
Commencement Bay. The conveyance system veers off this road near the bottom ofi the
hill and discharges in a small cove next to Commencemen# Bay.
There did not appear to be any excessive erosive areas along the conveyance
system's path.
Task 4- Describe the drainage system, and its existing and predicted problems
through observations and hydraulic modeling of the City specijied design
storm event described in Chapter 4 Volume /!/
The following section reviews the existing conveyance system with developed
basins using Stormshed a hydraulic modeling programs.
ft appears the downstream conveyance system is sized correctly for the developed
drainage basin in a 10 year storm event, see printout. Per City of Tacoma
requirements, only the conveyance system between a project and a 24" or iarger
main line needs to be reviewed, which is what is enclosed.
; ._ _ ..
3-3 , � �, � _ _. _ ,.. _ _ _ _
. - -, � �
�, :
: �
r ._ . e
. . �. . ;.
� '
,
-. ._, ;�
;
;
' ��
,- � 1;
, `- -~--' j
� •
. ; q� ,�..� i
� c�`'C�'n
0
, �
� '� .��
\
� �• \�`
� �.���.
I �
�
�
lp
�
Convayance Basln = \
229,332 sf or 5.26 acres
14 new horoes x 4,000 sf each =
56,000 sf or 1-29 acres
1 exlsting hor+e x 2,876 sf or
0.066 acres
Roadway/sidewatks 29,268 sf. or
0.57 acrPs
Totat i+�pervious surface is 88,144 sf
or 2•�2 acres
i Totai grass area = 141,i88 sf'
' or 3•24 acr es
�
N
� � �=-�! -�-
, ;
�I, � � ,
., � �
-�o
.____,� , L�l •, ,: ; __ _
, �-
; � i \ ''` i ._�-
� � � ---- --� -- ---
. . ,
. . , ,
, . . . .
` _ ' f 1
; ; :, `; `_ - : . . _
� �: �-- <-
'� � , � io r ,�
`� j + ,�:. �P7/ 9 : •.72R A
. � �ii c
-; i i ?
. : � . . . . . � :
i : � :�......�...._ ;.E : > .
; : �
u , j '� ..� ............ .:i': �ar
� ► ,, � i ",
� � o � �. : i: ! s
j I 1 ' � ' �`, j 1 �ae v:
� ZDNING=RS , .' % � �� i • I ..:r.....:
. �
7 .2 �: r` a � ..�, j ...._ '� � � � .......
� Z tiJG=R$ (1' � • -- , �
` , 1 .... j +.. ; . � .: ,
-,a�. + ' ; � ; � ' ', �1 ` .
wca�ices ' ta ; L 1 awo s.� ; � �
, / .
OPU iT : t ep�p � I � � � y '
( i '"" ) • i ._. .. �� • '� y ( / .' ..b,"•...". �
. ' � '. � I h .�
��''. X ii � `" �.
} ,a� , j �� - �i u.od ,`�/ � � �� ' s
.�i'ti7�7 � '
} � 6 :
t ' " !- 1 Tn° s► �:
� �� ^� � -�- .i •-�• < ' i ' � . ...�„r...---�i
�i�'> 1 � i :� z � 3 ' J ( a . � � t
� � �' OAO 9 :j OODI Q i 0�71 9 Q!O! 9 .: �
;' I' � , J ' �.'% '� 7�T79 ``•
� TM , , ��' ; ' � i
, � , � -
'' �'._ 1 1 ��,� �,A,�
;
'�' . i + j -
• � ct vi��e'u�
� i i!� I
:, � � ; j
A �F ` � 2 G' � � Y"' � ,
`p�, '•. � :%.' 1 , � i
� ���(/ � .�' � r I i
�`� i��=: �
� . 1 � � f•: �.
' 1 � '? `�l ��
1 , ' �:_ � � ��' 1i '°,
a �
i �
;
� ;
:� 0
ga
` DRAINAGE BAS1N FOR THE
;
� PUBLiC CONVEYANGE SYSTEM
� TO 36' I.INE 1N 58TH AVE. NE
�
%" CONSUlTiNG EN6iNEER8 Li.s
�o
" m aae� x� way so� �2ao (� ���� �
� ° Feae�� w8y, wA asoos
i i rEaour. v�r � ax-u�a
DpilinA, <1251 ai3-6/a�
w 9 WWW•ESMC�VII�COT� a.icMSe�c rsev� xt-zc�
/ M
Civll £nglneering Larnl Surveyk�g lond PlnrnMng
? PubUC Norkr i Pro,Ject MoncS}ee�ent , Londscupe A►chltoe'tu
i _
�
�
\ �. �-
� � � � •' p� `` �, J I
1 :t,� f l� •n l�
! � I 9 C'� .
t�
I Q 1 �5, �
1 p 1 � 1 � .,`� '` ��, i
i •s� ! i ' _ �
! I I •�
I 1 � � ��
1 1 t , '�.
� I ! � i "�
j i �` ' _.
-� �� .�.� � �n� ��
� t. ;
� __ ,_.
�z � ¢_ �� �.
�'� �� •... < . m " �,
�. k_ -
J�B N�. � �� 1453-002
DRAWING NAME + DRAINAGE BASiNS
DATE � 1-8-08
DRAWN t S�S
SHEET 1 OF i
FlGURE I�-A
fb .EJt �4kw:tryW Ds,s'M.c Ikb . . . .. ..... . . . . . .
........ _ ._ _ � -_ . .:_ . �. _._:_..., .. _ _ .. .._ _.. _
!DdQi �:J 8.4�_��.: \`:!�� 4dt7� E:
� tl �p
=: �ewr
. )i sam
{� onosmxc
c �.�a'dw'�a*o�c
,�. 3��]�
� '
WtYd
= Q�
1fm1
M4R'.
' NaD7
1110101iP[
^ eM�drts
�.:� ,� -
� �I.�;v ,. � �l�l�:aa..�� �,- - -
�� as�s !3'nion• Cle�red:14at8:3A Tsesda�•, December 00, 3Q1t7
- � �''[�„�'
' � vaoio�va� Record Id: B-002
= �� p,dwpr
� M'deD+�s
a t.roas
:�o 1lirtkd
�
HC01
• - amz
'.' �
= - x mororn�
i� 0r�
� �6981� p
P�O: �
I �NOtpM�f �
2.6
�06 03� p
�
/�
2 f�9
���
:.7
Comreyance from the Project Site to the Existing 35" Storm line in 59` Ave_ NE
n
Desi�n 11d6od
taam (�0-3�
trods �0.9ts)
Composite C
u
a1 � IDF?aWe: � Fn
:ak
�Sub c
��
TC Cak
L.ea¢ih � Sl�ope ( Coe �1"uc
((�d (� �Olha atreaou. maa-a�ade d�amaets and pgx �� ft {.00!s '- •__" —
� DQecdq Cameaed TC
ROOiEItYD �j TID2G jiiatided� GSL�G Fedcra] tti�a� �'D j10 pl Z�OTZERO REI aT[V£ A47fOti.�1
•------ �----
;Rcx6 ID ea (ac) TC (min) iAmr (cfs) jfatt ¢ (cfs) �e11 ntio yDept6 (it) � S'ne �oYe! {Ifh) 'el (ftfs)
1 P-001 5.1700 ?'.i5 � 3.6930 3.1733 � 0.85 ; O.iH96 �r0'D;aw 6327� 5.8181
� PA02 53700 j?�.75 r'_6313�+ 43173 ? 0 61 i 036d0 �1: Diam 3_7W. S.Q9b9
r ..�. .�._._._.....-_.--_�---.---°�� �
�F�am 1odc�To �ode iRcb ioss {ft) zlpp (k) 73end {fQ!JuoN Loss (f�):HIF Loss £le� (p3�� � It���
: 385.i798 �
� N-00� � Ti-fl03 386.3651 ;03:85 � OA633 � •---•- i 3S6.Ql : 3903100 s
N-001 � ?�-00? 3S9.S1i4 ; -•--- i ----- � -----• 389.51�4 ; 393.a900 i
Licaeed ro: E�1 Coasdm+g Eupjoee+s LLC
Fiows in a Rationa110 year event from 5.27 acres, is 2.7 CFS.
G ou ���"tm�c� � j�,y� ;�� - '7 -- ra-co,� o'
uio ! H
B-001
i5 aan
��
_ ��
� _
, � �.
�. �. � �_
�'�_..r,� �/ t �
e
i...�v w N= � �.... ,,
C Sys�en
�I
°
a'
�- �-
_i _f .
i , , I.
� � _1°_�_
nmirau[nt
e I _� oi 0j
I
I •�.y .� ,.,
� Inl. °
SECTION IV
WATER QUANTITY AND QUALITY
ANALYSIS AND DESiGN
As indicted in previous sections, this project proposes to provide flow control as
required by both the City of Federal Way and the City of Tacoma.
WATER QUANTITY
Area-Specific Flow Control Standards
Under the City of Federal Way, this project would be subject to Core Requirement #3
(Flow Contro!) which, at a minimum, would need to comply with one of the three area-
specifiic flow control standards: Leve1 1, Level 2, or Level 3, whichever applies per the
threshold infor detailed in Section 1.2.3.1 ofi the 1998 KCSWDM. King County
Department of Natural Resources has determined by the King County Flow Control
Applications Map that a Level 1 Flow Control application would be appropriate for this
area. The City of Federal Way's F1ow Control Map also shows this area as a Level 1.
KCRTS will be used for flow control modeling of the development.
Under the City of Tacoma, per the Figure 3-4 of the TSWMM, the proposed onsite
improvements (buildings, driveways and the private access road) wiil introduce more
than 10,000 square feet of effective impervious area. However, it does not discharge to
Leach Creek or Flett Creek Watersheds, nor does it discharge to fresh water, so oniy a
qualitative downstream analysis in required. The analysis in the previous section shows
the existing conveyance system will contain the proposed flows, so the only control
required from Tacoma is a level 1.
The proposal is to design a detention pond using a"continues rainfall/runoff modeling",
which, since the site is in King County, will be KCRTS. It will discharge, per Tabie
1.2.3.A of the KCSWDM, °match the exisfiing 2-year to 10-year peak flow, which is
generally a Level 1.
Existing Site Hydrology
Existing conditions on the Norpoint Heights Subdivision site consists of underbrush,
trees, one power pole, no buildings and gravel driveway aN in a forest condition. There
is only basin, Basin A(See Figure IV-A). Using KCRTS the site will be modeled as til!
forest including a portion ofi Norpoint Way NE right-of-way, as detailed in the area
delineation table below:
TABLE N.1
ed Pond Tributarv Area
AREA
BAS1N A i 3.13
IMPERV. T1LL TILL
(/4c) GRASS FOREST
. (Ac) (Ac)
0.00 t�.GO 3.i 3
4i . _
_;::
"� � ` � `
,, __ . ..s�. _
Runoff files for the existing conditions were performed using KCRTS software in the
SeaTac Region with:
1.0 Scale Factor,
1-hour Time Step, and
Reduced Rainfall Data.
Tne resufts of the analysis are shown as follows:
Flow Frequency Analysis (Existing Conditions)
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:predev.tsf
Project Location:5ea-Tac
---Annuai Peak Flow Rates---
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak
(CFS)
0.197 2
0.054 7
0.147 4
0.005 8
0.087 6
0.151 3
0.128 5
0.252 1
Computed Peaks
2/09/O1 18:00
1/06/02 3:00
2/28/03 3:00
3/24/04 20:00
1/O5/05 8:00
1/18/06 21:00
11/24/06 4:00
1/09/08 9:00
Deve{oped Conditions
-----Flow Frequency Analysis-------
- - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob
(CFS) Period
0.252 1 100.00 0.990
0.197 2 25.00 0.96a
0.151 3 10.00 0.900
0_147 4 5.00 0.800
0.128 5 3.00 0.66'J
0.087 6 2.00 0_500
0.054 7 1.30 0.231
0.005 8 1.10 0.091
0.234 50.00 0.980
The developed conditions will consis# of the Norpoint Heights Subdivision, new
roadway, pond, and landscape areas in Basin A. (See Figure IV) The sizing will use a
4,000 s.#. roof area for each of the homes along with about 5,300 sf of impervious
private driveway. Developed land use types are delineated in the table below:
B�SiiV
BASIN A
TABLE IV.2
Develo ed Pond Tributa Area
TOTAL 1RAPERV. T1LL TILL
AREA (Ac) GRASS FOREST
(Ac) (Ac) (Ac)
3.13 2.03 1.05 0.00
BYPASS
1MPERd
0.05
Runoff files for the proposed conditions were performed using KCRTS software in the
SeaTac Region with:
Scale Factor = 1,
1-hour Time Step, and
Reduced Rainfall Data.
The results of the analysis are shown as follows:
4-2
. � .
� . � �--_ __
y. . �� : � �. ���:
Flow Frequency Analysis (Developed Conditions and Bypass Flow Rate)
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:dev.tsf
Project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates---
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak
(CFS)
0_586 b
0.481 8
0.704 3
0.525 7
0.632 4
0.623 5
0.764 2
1.18 1
Computed Peaks
2/09/O1
1/05/02
2/27/03
8/26/04
10/28/04
1/18/06
10/26/06
1/09/08
2:00
16:00
7:00
2:00
15:00
16:00
0:00
6:Q0
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:bypass.tsf
Project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates---
Plow Rate Rank Time of Peak
(CFS)
0.012 7
0.011 8
0.015 3
0.012 6
0.015 4
0.013 5
0.018 2
0.023 1
Computed Peaks
2/09/O1 2:00
1/OS/02 16:00
12/08/02 18:00
8/26J04 2:00
10/28/04 16:00
1/18/06 16:00
10/26/06 0:00
1/09/08 6:00
-----Flow Frequency Analysis-------
- - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob
(CFS) Period
1.18 1 100.00 0.990
0.764 2 25.00 0.960
0.704 3 10.00 0.900
0.632 4 5.00 0.800
0.623 5 3.00 0.667
0.586 6 2.00 0.500
0.525 7 1.30 0.231
0.481 8 1.10 0.091
1.04 50.00 0.980
-----Flow Frequency Analysis-------
- - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob
(CFS) Period
0_023 1 100.00 0.990
0.018 2 25.00 0.960
0.015 3 10.00 0.900
0.015 4 5.00 0.800
0.013 5 3.00 0.667
O.D12 5 2.0� 0.500
0.012 7 1.30 0.231
O.Oil 8 1.10 0.091
0.022 50.00 �.98Q
The ailowable release rates from the pond for Basin A per the Level 1 Flow Control are
shown below:
BASIld A
STORM EVENTS
2 Year
10 Year
Pond
EXiSTING
FLOUV RATE
0.09
0.15
TABLE IV.3
ributa Flow Rates
DEVEI.OPED BYPASS
FLOW RATE �LOW RATE
(CFS) (CFS)
0.59 0.01
0.70 0.02
ALLOWED
RELEA.SE RATE
OA9
0.15
The data shown below demons#rate the required sizing for the detention pond per the
Level 1 Flow Control analysis.
Basin A
Pond Bottom Length: 88.5 ft
Pond Bottom Width: 29.5 ft
Side Siope: 3 H: 1V
Orifice #1: Ht = 0.0', Dia. =1.32"
4-3
�
_ ._ _+�
:�
�
,� �.:
�.: ;
Orific� #2: Ht = 4.0', Dia. = 1.26"
Effective Storage Depth: 5.00 ft
Storage Volume: 23,427 ft
Type of Facility:
Side Slope:
Pond Bottom Length:
Pond Bottom Width:
Pond Bottom Area:
Top Area at 1 ft. FB:
Effective Storage Depth
Stage 0 Elevation
Storage volume
Riser Head:
Riser Diameter:
Number of orifices:
Detention Pond
3.00 H:1V
88.56 ft
29.52 ft
2614. sq. ft
8161. sq. ft
0.187 acres
5.00 ft
901.00 ft
23427. Cu. ft
0.538 ac-ft
5.00 ft
12.00 inches
2
Full Head
Discharge
(CFS)
0.105
0.043
Pipe
Diameter
(in)
Orifice # Height Diameter
tft) (in)
1 0.00 1.32
2 4.00 1.26
Top Notch Weir: None
Outflow Rating Curve: None
Stage
(ft)
0.00
0_O1
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.07
0.08
0.10
0.11
0.21
0.31
0.41
0.51
0.61
0.71
0.81
0.91
1.01
1.11
1.21
1.31
1.41
1.51
1.61
1.71
1.81
1.91
2.01
2.11
2.21
2.31
2.41
2.51
Elevation
(ft)
901.00
901.01
901.03
901.04
903.05
901.07
901.08
901.10
901.11
901.21
901.31
901.41
901.51
901.6i
901.71
901.81
901.91
902.01
902.11
902.21
902.31
902.43
902.51
902.61
902.71
902.81
902.91
903.Oi
903_11
903.21
903.31
903.41
903.51
4.0
Storage Discharge
(cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs)
0. 0.000 0.000
26. 0.001 0.005
79. 0.002 0.008
105. 0.002 0.010
132. 0.003 0.011
185. 0.004 0.012
2i1. 0.005 0.013
265. 0.006 0.015
292. 0.007 0.016
565. 0.013 0.022
845. 0.019 0.026
i132. 0.026 0.030
1427. 0.033 0.034
1729. 0.040 0.037
2039. 0.047 0.040
2356. 0.054 0.042
2681. 0.062 0.045
3014. 0.064 0.047
3355. 0.077 0.049
3703. 0.085 0.052
4060. 0.093 0.054
4424. 0.102 0.056
4797. 0.110 0.058
5177. 0.119 0.060
5566. 0.128 0.061
5963. 0.137 0.063
6369. 0.146 0.065
6783. 0.156 0.067
7206. 0.165 O.OfiB
7637_ 0.175 0.070
8�7;. 0.185 O.C71
8526. 0.196 0.073
8983. 0_206 0.074
Percoiation
fcfs)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0_00
0.00
0_00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
D.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.OG
Q.00
0.00
Surf Area
(sq. ft)
2614.
2621.
2636.
2643.
2650.
2664.
2671.
2685.
2693.
2765.
2837.
2911.
2985_
3060.
3135.
3212_
3289.
3367.
3445.
3524.
3604.
3685.
3766.
3848.
3931.
4015.
4099.
4184.
4269.
4356.
4443.
4531.
4619.
� �
� �.", �, � ,
4-4 ;� ,, -- -
� � -;, � 4 ►�,� � �,�
� � �� #
� ,..
,.� .�.. A>� . r
� � g �. -- � _ ..
� . .�_�.: , .
2.61
2.71
2.81
2.91
3.01
3.11
3.21
3.31
3.41
3.51
3.61
3.�1
3.81
3.91
4.00
4.01
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.07
4.08
4.09
4.i1
4.12
4.22
4.32
4.42
4.52
4.62
4.72
4.82
4.92
5.00
5.10
5.20
5.30
5.40
5.50
5.60
5.70
5.80
5.90
6.00
6.10
6.20
6.30
6.40
6.50
6.60
6.70
6.80
6.90
7.00
Hyd Inflow
1 1.18
2 0.59
3 0.59
4 0.62
5 0.70
6 0.37
7 0_48
903.61
903.71
903.81
903.91
904.01
904.11
904.21
904.31
904.41
904.51
904.61
904.71
904.81
904.91
905.00
905.01
905.03
905.04
905.05
905.07
905.08
905.09
905.11
905.12
905.22
905.32
905.42
905.52
905.62
905.72
905.82
905.92
906.00
906.10
906.20
906.30
906.40
906.50
906.60
906.70
906.80
906.90
907.00
907.10
907.20
907.30
907.40
907.50
907.60
907.70
907.80
907.90
908.00
Outflow
0.89
0.42
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.09
0.08
9450.
9925.
10409.
10903.
11406.
11917.
12439.
12969.
13509.
14059.
14618.
15187.
15766.
16355.
16893.
16953.
17074.
17134.
17195_
17317.
17378.
17439.
17561.
1�623.
18242.
18872.
i9512.
20i62.
20822.
21493.
22174.
22866.
23427_
24138.
24860.
25592.
26336.
27090.
27856.
28633.
29420.
30219_
31030.
31852.
32685.
33530.
34386.
35254.
35134.
37026.
37930.
38846.
39773.
G.217
0.228
0.239
0.250
0_262
0.274
0.286
0.298
0.310
0.323
0.336
0.349
0.362
0.375
0.388
0.389
0.392
0.393
0.395
0.398
0.399
0.400
0.403
0.405
0.419
0.433
0.448
0.463
0.478
0.493
0.509
0.525
0.538
0.554
0.571
0.588
0.605
0.622
0.639
0.657
0.675
0.694
0.712
0.731
0.750
0.770
0.789
0.809
0.830
0.850
0.871
0.892
0.913
Peak
Stage Elev
5.18 906.18
5.09 906.09
5.00 906.00
4.70 905.70
4.56 905.56
3.55 904_65
2.70 903.70
0.076
0.077
0.079
0.080
0.081
0.083
0.084
0.085
0.087
0.088
0.089
0.090
0.092
0.093
0.094
0.094
0.095
0.09�
0.100
0.103
0.107
0.108
0_109
0.110
0.117
0.122
0.127
0.131
0.135
0.139
0.142
0.145
0.148
0.460
1.030
1.760
2.550
2.840
3.100
3.330
3.550
3.760
3.960
4.150
4.320
4.500
4.560
4.820
4.970
5.120
5.270
5.410
5.550
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0_00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0_00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Storage
(Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft)
24687. 0_567
24048. 0.552
23424. 0.538 `
21338. 0.490
20456. 0.470
14858. 0.341
9901. 0.227
4709.
4799.
4889.
4981.
5073.
5166.
5259.
5354.
5449.
5544.
5641.
5738.
5836.
5935.
6024.
6034.
6054_
6064.
6074.
6094_
6104.
6114.
6134.
6144.
6245.
6347.
6449.
6552.
6656.
6760.
6865.
6971.
7057.
7164.
7272.
7380.
7490.
7600.
7711.
7822.
7934.
8047.
8161.
8275.
8391.
8506.
8623.
8740_
6858.
8977.
9096.
9217.
9338.
i _._._._.. - . _
� � � �
��. i��_..., c :_-s� _-----
4-5
8 0.53 0.07 2.18 903.18 7527. 0.173
Hyd R/D Facility Tributary Reservoir
Outflow Inflow Inflow
i 0.89 0.02 ********
2 0.42 0.�1 ***�****
3 0.15 0.01 ********
4 0.14 0.01 ********
5 0.13 0.01 ********
6 0.09 0.01 ********
7 0.08 0.01 ********
8 0.07 0.01 **+*****
----------------------------------
Route Time Series through Facility
Inflow Time Series File:dev.tsf
Outflow Time Series File:rdout
POC Time Series File:dsout
Inflow/Outflow Analysis
Peak Inflow Discharge:
Peak Outflow Discharge:
Peak Reservoir Stage:
Peak Reservoir Elev:
Peak Reservoir Storage:
POC Outflow
Target Calc
******* 0.91
******* 0.43
0.15 0.15
«�****� 0.14
******* 0.14
0.09 0.09
******* 0.08
******* 0.07
1.18 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 6
0.893 CFS at 9:00 on Jan 9 in Year S
5.18 Ft
906.18 Ft
24fi87. Cu-Ft
0.567 Ac-Ft
Add Time Series:bypass.tsf
Peak Summed Discharge: 0.912 CFS at 9:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Point of Compliance File:dsout.tsf
Fiow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:dsout.tsf
Project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates---
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak
(CFS)
0.426 2 2/09/O1 16:00
0.079 7 12/28/O1 16:00
0.135 S 2J28/03 6:00
0_072 8 8/26/0� 4:00
0.092 6 1/05/OS 8:00
0.140 4 1/18/06 21:00
0.152 3 11/24/OE 6:00
0.912 1 1/09/OS 9:00
Computed Peaks
BA$1N A
STORM EVENTS
2 Year
10 Year
'ED CALCULATED
RATE RELEASE RATE
) ECFS) `
0.09
0.15
0.15
Aiso see Appendix for complete computer printouts for Basin A.
' � "�' � _ ��
, _�:-� .
-----Flow Frequency Analysis-------
- - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob
(CFS) Period
0.912 1 100.00 0.990
0.426 2 25_00 0.960
0.152 3 10.00 0.900
0.140 4 5.00 0.800
0.135 S 3.00 0.667
0.092 6 2.00 0.500
0.079 7 1.30 0.231
0.072 8 1_10 0.091
fl.750 50.00 0.980
TABLE iV.4
Pond Flow Sum
4-6
WATER QUALITY
As indicted in previous sections, this project also proposes to provide water quality
control as required by both the City of Federal Way and the City of Tacoma.
Reviewing the Federal Way Surface Water Resources Map, the "basic water guality" is
required for this project.
Under the City of Tacoma, since this project does not discharge to fish bearing stream,
it would not need enhanced treatment for water quality, but it wiU be a project with a
totaf ofi 5,000 square feet or more of poHution-generating impervious surface (PGIS) in a
threshold discharge area, so it would be subject to the "Basic Treatment" options.
The proposed Norpoint Heights Residential Subdivision will utilize a combined
detention/wetpool facility as mitigation for water quality. Since the bottom of the
proposed detention/wetpoo! facility is less than 1,500 SF, no access road to the bottom
is proposed.
The following is a wet pond calculation sheet from King County;
. x , -.. • .. .:
. :
';' ' f '. c .., �- . � . _ _ ..... ..
_ §. ._..�..-. - _._.
, � � � � . .. � ,-_ ��j:�o_�'__"
4-7 = .,.:, . ��� _
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WTER DESIGN MANUAL
WETPOND SIZING WORKSHEET
Summary of the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual Requirements
Project Name: Norpoint Heights 1453-002-007
METHOD OF ANALYSIS (see p. 6-68)
Step 1} Determine Volume factor, f
Basic Size? f =
Large Size? f =
3 Consuit WQ requirement(Section 1_2.8)
4_5 to determine if basic or large size needed
Step 2) Determine rainfall R for mean annual storm
Rainfail (R) 0.039 (feet) Required from Figure 6.4.1.A
Step 3) Calcutate runoff from mean annual storm
V� _(0.9A 0.25A�+ O. lOA� fl.01 A * R
A tributary area of impervious surface
A tributary area of till grass
A tributary area of till forest
A tributary area of outwash grass
R= rainfail from mean annual storm
V� voiume of runoff from mean annual storm
Step 4) Calculate wetpoo! volume
u
f = Volume factor
V = volume runoff, mean annual storm
V = Volume of the wetpool
88293 (�
45588 (�
o (�)
0 (ft
0.039 (ft)
3544 (ft )
Determine now
Determine now
Determine now
Determine now
From Step 2
3 (unitless) From Step 1
3544 (fl ) From Step 3
10631 (ft ) : �
�. - ��
-, . L ��"°y ���,
Step 5) Determine wetpool dimensions
a) Determine geometry of first cell
Voiume in fu cell 3189 (fl )
Depth h 1 st celi (minus sed. Stor.) 3(ft)
Determine horizontal xs-area at surface at mid-depth using A, = V,�/h
A„�= 1063 (f�)
Mid-width 33 (ft)
Mid-length 33 (ft)
Z= Side slope length: _(H): i(V)
2(h/2 * Z) _
Find top dimensions by adjusting for shape geometrics
Top width
Top Len�tt�
A,� _
> �`
����..������ ��
25-35% of total
See Section 6_4.1.2
2 (ft) 3:1 recommended
6 (ft)
39 (ft)
-- 39 tft�
1490 (f�) �.
t � � `�E
�. . --
�,� �'� ' ' ,�',
f i��� j , , t,.. � ...w., ... .. ..«_ . ���.
1998 Surface Water Design Manual I:\esmyobs�1025�documents\CALC-003.xis
b) Determine gemoetry of second ceil
Volume in second cell
Depth h of 2nd celi
Determine horizontai xs-area at mid depth using A = V
A���a -
Mid-width
Mid-length
Determine xs-area at surface
Z= Side slope length: _{H): 1(V)
2(h/2 * Z) _
Top width
T,� length
A,� _
Adjust Cell 2 width to match cell 1
Adjust Ce112 length using A,�
Geometry check: overall pond L: W at mid depth = 3: 1
Pond width (mid-depth)
Ce1! I length (mid-depth)
Cell 2 length (mid-depth)
Pond length (mid-depth) = cel 1+2
I-mid - W mid
7441 (ft')
3 (ft)
18b0 (ft
43 (ft)
43 (ft)
1 (ft)
3 (8)
46 (ft)
46 (ft)
2128 (ft
39 (ft)
55 (ft)
33 (ft)
33 (ft)
52 (ft)
85 (ft)
2.60
Step 6) Adjust shapQ of pond to blend into site (recommeneded)
Use the same side-slopes and depth as above
March pond surface area for each cell
Make sure L: W ratio sti113: i, or if one-celled, 4:1
Step 7) Design rest of pond (see Criteria p. 6-72)
Internai Berm
Inlet & Out(et
Primary overflow
Access
Other Design Details {Sections 62.2, p. 6-18, 6.2.3, p.20 and 6.2.4, p. 6-22)
Sequence of Facilities
Setbacks
Sideslopes, fencing, embankment
Total wetiand surface area estimate
Surface area 1 st cell + 2nd cell + area for intemal berm + area for access ramp
��Z
Must be 65-75%
See Section 6.4.1.2
Used to check L: W
3:1 recommended
Plus setbacks, access roads, 100-yr conveyance
'� � �`;
,_ } _
_ �. _
1998 Surface Wazer Design Manual I:1esm jobs\1025\docamentsiCALC-003.x1s
SECTION V
SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES
Enclosed a soils report and infiltration report is pa�t of this preliminary Technical
lnformation Report.
, : : .___, _.
_, �� -
.. +u� � } ��=-._._
�- . ._.
5-1
ph.253-896•IOli
Fx.253-896-2633
GeaResources LLC
5007 Pacific Hwy. E, Su�te 2A
�fe, Washingtfln 984?�-2649
January i fi, 2008
Landmaric Homes, lnc.
PO Box 2641 fi
Federat 1Nay� WA 98U93-2't 16
Atterrtion: Mr. L.arry tCing
Mr. David litawwitzz
Geated�nica! Engir�eering Services
Proposed Re�denti�l Developmettt
NorpolM Resideriti2�1 Plat
Browns Polnt Area
Federat Way� Washington
Job: LandmaricHm.Norpolnt.RG
1�!"iR{}DUCTION AND SC�PE
Thts report summarizes our sife observations and provides geotechntcal
recommendati�ns and design criteria for the proposed Norpoint Resider�iai Plat to be locatad
nort� a# Norpoint Way in the Brovms Poini area o# Federa! Way, Washing#on. The generat
location of ttte site is shown on the �cinity Ni�p, Figure 1.
Our un�ers#anding o# ths p�ojeot !s based cn our discusslons with yos� and Mr. Stuart
Scheuerman of ESM {ctvil enginesr), a review of the prellminary pfans provlded, and on our
experience in the area. We understand that current pians cali #or creati�g a new roadway for
approximately �4 residentiai lots with associated drroeways and u�lities. The�site
conliguration and topography is ilfustrated on the Site Ptan, Figure 2.
The purpvse of our services is fo evaluate the surtace and sc�bsurface condit�ans ai
#he siie as a basls for addressing the Federat Way Critical Areas Ordinance as weN as
addressing the poten�at of the site soNs for supporting a s�omnwater detention pond. We have
atso included geoiechnical �e�ammendations and deslgn cri#eria fa� the �roject. We received
your writ#en authoriza#ion on December 28, 20t37. Speclf�atiy, the scope of services for this
project wili include the foitowin�:
1. Reviewing the ava�abte geologic, hydrogeologlc and geotechnical data ior the si#e
�area.
2. Evaluating #he shaliow subsurfac� condl#lons at the site by observing open test pits at
the site.
3. Addressing the appropriate geotechnicat regufatory �equirements for #he proposed s�e
development, per ariy City of Federai Way CAO requiremenf�.
4. Providing geatechnlcal recommendations for site grading lncluding site preparation.
subg�ade preparation, fiil ptacement criterla, suitab�iity of ot�-site soiis for use as
structural flli, temporary and permanent cut and fill stapes, and drainage and erosion
control measures.
5, Providing recommenda�ons a�d design crlte�ia for cx�rnren#ional #ounda�on and floor
slab support, Incl�d`mg ailowabie bearing capacl�y, subgrade modulus, iaferai
resistance values and estimates of settlement. �
� . ,
.. �, . .
:. �. �. d . �: . . _ _ 1..... .
;, , g;.- _ .. _ . - -.�......_ .
} ( �,. =
Y �E . t..�. .. _,�'....-..�a k.si' 4 _ . _ _..
Landma�kHm.Norpoir+t.Ra
January 16, 2008
Page 2
6. Providing recc�mmendations and design criteria #or the deslgn flf conventlonal
subgradehetaining wa�is, inciuding backfiil and drainage requiremen#s,laterai design
Ioads, and laterai resistance vatues.
7. Provkiing recarnmendattons ior pavement subgrade preparation.
8. Providing appropr�a#e IBC seismic desfgn parameters for the proposed �esidential
stru�#ures.
s�r� coNOmoNs
surfece cor�dinor�s
The proposed Nvrpoln# resider�tlal plat �S ioc�ted in an area of established resider�tial
develc�pmeM. 'fhe subJeci property consist� of two adjoining ta�c parceis that are generally
rec#angular in shape. Tfie slte �S hounded by Norpoint Way NE on the West, e�asfing resider�lai
develapment an the east, north, and sc�uth. The King — Plerce County Ilne blsects extreme
soulhwest comer of the s1te. The slte r.onfigura�� for propc�sed development !s iNustrated on
the Slte Plan� Flgure 2.
The projec� site is situated on the wes� margin af a loca! tapographlc �id9s. The ground
surface at the site is generalEy flat to gently sloping In the no�eas# portion oi the site and geMty
to moderatefy slopin� to the west tn the remaining area. Slopes at the st#e range #rom
app�oxirnately 5 percent to 24 percent�
The site is cutrer�tiy vegetated with young alder and maple, and scattered smat� conifers
with a!ow understury oi vine mapie, nat'sve wandering biackber�r� and occasionai huckleberry.
hdiy and salai. Lo�alized areas of invasive blackberry and grasses oa:ur. No ev�dence of
sqnding water� seepa ar springs were observed on the site. No evidence of erosion or sbpe
instabflrty was obseNed at the site or the ad�ace� areas.
Site Soils �
Ait�ough 1he sub]ect property is located In an area that is not mapped by tfie Soil
Survey iar Pierce County (USDA IVatural Resource Conservation Service web soit surveyj,
the adjacent propertias #o tha no�th are mapped as being underlaln by the Alcienrvood graveqy
sandy toam (1 C) soils thai form on S to 15 percen# slopes. The Atderwoad so{1s are derived
from giaciai tilf and are ciass�isd as having a"modera#e" poter�Ual #or erosion w�en exposed.
Ar� excsrpt from #he NRCS so11s map fo� the site area is inctuded as Figure 3.
As previousiy stated, we obseroed no evidence oi slgnfficant erosion at �e si�e at the
�me of our slie visit.
SRe Geology
Accc>rding #o tfie Geologic rr�ap of f�+e Tacoma North 7.5 minuta Quadrangle Pisrce
Counfy, Wash/ngton in revlew (Troost, K.G.� Booth, D.B., and Borden, R.K.), the siis is in an �
arsa undeflaM by giacla! outwash depostts {Qvr) and glacial tQ! {Qvt). The outwash and tiil
deposlts ware deposited during the Vashon stade ot the Fraser Gfacla�on, approximately
i2,UU0 to 15,000 yea�s aga The ou#wash deposits generally cansist of a poorly sira�+fi'sd
mixture of sand and grave! lhat may locafly contatn silt. cobbies or boulders. The Vast►on
g�cial tNl was deposfted at the base of the advanclr�g glac3af Ice and subsequer�ity overrtdden
by the gladat ice. As such, the glaciat �II Is conslderad densely consofidated offer �igh
s#reng#h characteristics. The ouiwash deposlts are considered normatly consoiidated and
offer moderate s�reng#h characteristics. An excerp# of #he Geolagic Map is attached as
Flgure 4.
. .:
- � ---.
; .,.
'� �� ; > _�
LsndmatkHm.Norpolnt.Ra
January 18. 20�8
Page 3
Subsuriace Conditions
pur in#erpretation of the subsurface cond"+tions at the site a�e based on our site
observatfons, data review and experience in the area. The exis�ng open iest pits observed at
ihe sits ran�ed from 4.b to 7 feet in depth and generally confirmed the mapped stratlgraphy. ln
general� the test pit� encountered Y� to 1-foot o# forest duft and topsoii man�ing sand and gravel
with variable amounts of sttt and cobbtes. We Interpret tMis sand and gravei material to be
recessional outwash deposits. The tes# pi�s on the southwest porrt��on of the site encoumered
ihe sand and gravei to depths of up to 6 feet. Glacial t+lt was encountered at depths of 5 io S
fieet below the ground sur�ace. Tes# pi�s in #he northeasi portion afi trie site encountered
bet+nreen 3 and 4 fee# of outwash sand and gravet over glaciat til�.
The recessional outwash sand wi#h gravel soUs were in a medlum dense to dense conditi�n.
The outwash was undedain by dense #o very dense glaclal til1. Although no groundwater
seepage was observed, la�i'ized mottling was observed in the upper partion of the glacial tiU in
seve�al of the test p'�#s in the west portion o# #he sfte. Thls wouid suggest a seasonal perched
groundwater condition, Nkefy abovs the dense glacial till. Perched grour�dwa#er typically
develops when ti�e vertical infittration of preclpl#ati�n through a more permeabie soil is stowed
at depth by a deeper, less permeable saA iyps. The greatest vot�me of pe�ched water will
likeiy occur in tate spring or early summer� following the wet weather season.
Landslide Hazard tndlc�to�s -- per City of federat Way Muntalpat Code, Chapter 98.24
Ti�e City af Federal Way Munlclpai Code, Ghapter 18.24 defines geotogtcaUy
hazarclous areas because of thet� susceptl�il'�ty #o erosian, tandstiding, seismlc or other
geological even#s are not suited to commerclai, �esidentiai or indus#r�ai devefopment
consistent with pubfia health or safety concems. 1..�ndsiide hazard areas are ihose areas
potentiaiiy subject tc� episodic dowr�stape mavement a# a mass of soiS or rock inciuding but no#
t'imited to the following areas:
a. Any area with a combination of:
1. Stopes greater #han 15 percent;
2. Permeabie sediment {predominately sand and g�avei) overiying relatively
impermeabie sediment or bedrock �typica!!y silt and clay); and
S. Springs or groundwater seepage.
b. Any a�ea which has shown movemen# during the Holocene epoch, fram 10.000 yea�s ago
to the present, or which is underlain by mass wastage �lebris of tha# epoch.
c. Any area potentially unstable as a resuft of rapld stream 'snc�sion, stream bank efosion or
unde�cxattln� by wave action.
d. Any area located in a ravine ar on an active alluvial fan, presently or potentialiy subjeat to
intt�da�on by debris flows or ftooding.
e. Those arsas idsriti�ed by #he United States Department oi Agriculture So� Conservatian
Serv+ce as having a severe timi�at�an fa� bullding site devetopment.
f. Those areas mapped as Class U{unstabte), UOS �unstabie oid siides), and URS {unstabie
recent stides) by #he Departmen# of Ecology.
g. Stopes having gradients greater than 8t) �ercent subject to rockfal! during seismic shaking,
Eroston Hazards — per Clty of Federaf Way Chapier i 8.24
Tt�e City of Federal Way Municipal Code, Chap#er 18.24 de�ines erosion i�azard areas
as generally consfsttng uf areas hav3ng severe io very severe erosion hazard d�+e to na#ural
sget�is such �s vyind, rain, �pt�sh, #rost acti�n ar straam #low. Trie Everett and Narsline soils
mapped in t�e site area are Ilsted as having a"moderate" poten�ai for erosion when expased.
Tfiiese soils are afso tis#ed as betng wati drained to moderately wefl drai�ed and havlr+g a
rapid to moderatety rapid permeabllity� respectively.
__ _ . _. .
�� � � �"_
Lendmarki-tm.Norpotnl,RG
January 16, 2008
Page 4
No evidence of srasion or slope instabiiity was observed at the site at khe dme ofi our
site v{sft.
Selsmic Hezards — per Clty of Federai Way Chepter i 8.24
The City of Federal Way Municipal Code, Chapter 18.24 defines seismic hazard areas
as those areas subject to severe �isk of earthquake damage as a result of seismicaliy
induced ground shaking, slope failure, settlement or soii iiquefac�ion, or surface faui�ng.
These conditions occur in areas underlam by cohesionless soits oi I�w density usually ln
associaiion with a shallaw grouridwater iable.
According to the Selsmic Zone Map of the United States can#alned in Flgure 96-2 of
the 1997 IBC (International Building Cade}, the project site is located withfn Selsmlc Atsk
Zone 3. 8ased on the subsurface cond�lons observed at the site� we interpret fhe s#nacturaS
site condi�ons to corresponds with a selsmi� Soil Proflle type Sp� (Siie Class pD") as de�ned
by Table 1Si5.1.� in tf�e 2t10318C d�umer�ts. This is based on the Nkely range of eqWvalent
SPT (Standard Penetration Zest) blow c�unts for the soil types observed �#he site erea.
These cond�ions were assumed to be represer�tat�ve fior the coruli�ons beyond the depths
expiored. S#ructuras focated at ihe slte that are coristructed in accordance wlth the appropriate
seismic c�iterla wlq have the same risk as o#her designed str�ctures fn the Puget Sound area.
COMCLUSlONS
Based on the results of our data review, site reconnaissance, subsurfiace expfora#ions
and our experi2nce in the area, it ls our optnion that the slte is suttebte for the proposed
residentia! pta# development. Grading a# #he stte is expected ta be timlted to locallzed cuts
and f��s to meet the design grades. Canventiona! fooiings may be utilized in areas ofi medium
dense to dense r�ative sotl� or where the oid #iii materiai is recompacted following removai of
ihe large organic debris. The infilfration ot stormwater �noN from #he ma�ys wli! not liitely
be feasibfe a# this site. The lniiitra�or� o# roaf runaff is feasibfe based on the amount of
grading tha# occurs at the site.
Pertfc�en# canclusions and geotechnicat recommendat+ons regarding the deslgn and
cons#ruc#ion oi the proposed develapme� are presented below.
Landsikfe Nazards— per Crty of Faderaf Way Chapter 98.24
The City a# Federal Way Municipai Code, Chapter 18.24 uses the above reierenced
checklis# #o def'�e a tandsNde hazard area.
Slopes greater than t 5 percen# were observ�d on the site, but rw impermeabte
sediment or groundwate� seapage were observed. No areas of h!s#oric mass mflvemeni is
mapped or observed on the site, No areas o# stream incision, str�am bank erosion or
undercutting by wave act�on were observed at the time of our site vlsii. No ravines or on an
active ailuvial fan were observed on or adjacen# to the site at the #ime of our site visit. The
USDA SCS maps the Evere#t and Natstine saiis on the site as having "madera#e" Iim�taHons
for bullding site development. No stopes greater than 80 percent were obsenred on #he st�e et
the f�ms of our visit.
Based on our observatlons of the site and review o# pub{Ished infotma�on� ihe site
does not have any above listed lndlca#ors and therefore Is not c#asstfied as an ac#fvve landsiide
hazard area.
�#�ep �lape H�ard l�d�aa#ars — per City of Federaf Way 1Vlunidpaf Code, Chapter 1824
The City of Federai Way Municlpal Code� Chapter 18.24 de�rnes steep slope hazard
areas as t�►ase areas wtth a stope of 4U p�rcent or greater and wlth a ver�cal reGei of 10 or
more fest, a vertical rise �f 10 iee# or more for every 25 feet of horizonfiai dista�ce. A slo
�-�
_��, �� � _.� �' �
. . � r ,��.t, F :�� � . � � .- � -=�-- -..__� .
x,e+ �-.:,.
LandmarkHm.Notpolnl.Ra
aanua�y �s, 2ooa
Page 5
delineated by established its toe and top and rneasured by averaging the inciinat+on ovar at
least 10 fee# of vsrtical relief.
We dld not observe any slapes vf 40 percent or greater on the slte.
Erosion Hazerds — per City ot F�derei W�y Chapter i 8.?A
Based on our site observaiions and exptorations, it is our opinian that conventiona!
erosion controt measures wi11 provlde adequate erosion mltigation at this site. We recommend
that temporary and permansnt erosion con#rol measures be instailed and mafntained durtng
canstruction or as soon as praclical therea�ter, to tlmit the influx of wa#er onto exposed sals
and/or distu�bed areas. Erosion �onlroi measures sho�ld irtciude, but should not be limited
#o, berms and swates with check dams to direct surface water nmoff, ground coverlprotection
in expased areas and sftt fences where appropriate. Graded areas should be shaped to
avoid concentrations of nmaff onto c�1 or f1N siopes, naturai slopes nr oth+er erosion-sensf�ve
areas. Temporary ground coverlprotection such as jute matting, exceisf�r mai�ng, wood
chi�s or ciear plastic sheeting may be used urrtil the permanent eroston pro#ect� is
established.
Selsmic Haza�ds — per City of Federaf Way Chapter i 8.24
The Cify of Federai Way Municipal Code, Chapter 18.24 de#ines selsmic hazard areas
as those areas subject to ssvere risk of earthquaka damage as a resutt of seismi�aiiy
induced groun� shaking� slope falEure, setttement or soit liquefaction, or surface faulting.
These condi�ons accur in areas underiain by cohesionless soiis at fow denslty usuaily in
associatwn wEth a shallow groundwater tabls.
Based on our review of the subsurfacs cond�ions, we conclude that the site soiis are not
suscep�ble to iiquefacaon. The near-su�fiace soiEs are ger�eraliy in a medium dense to condition
and �1he sta�c water table is 1�ted below the soils encauntered at the s1te. Shaking a�f the
already dense soi! is �ot apt io produce a denser c�guration and subsequenUy excess pore
water pressures a�e not likety to be praluced.
Uquefact�on is a phenomenon where there is a reduc#ion or complete ioss of soif
strer�g#h due to an increase in water pressure. The increase in pvre waier pressure is
induce� by seismic vibra�ons. l.iy�afaction mainly affects genlogfcally �ecent deposits o#
ioose, fine-grained sands that are below the groundwater table. 8ased on the densi�r and
coarse-grained nature of ihe giaaaliy derived soNs observed on ihe siie, and the lack of a
groundwater table, it is our opinion that the risk for !'�quefaction to occur at ihls site during an
eatthqt,�ke is negligibie.
Site Preparation
Areas to be grad8d should be cieated of deleterious mattet in�luding any existing
stn�ctures, foundaiions, abandoned utlilty lines, debris and vegetation. T#�e por�ions oi the
stte stil! r.overed with vegetation shoufd be stripped of any fiorest duffi and organic-iaden soils.
?hese materials can be stockplles and later used for eroslon comrot or should be removed
from the site.
Where ptacernent of f�t materiat �S required, the strippedlexposed subgrade areas
should be compacted to a�irm and unyielding surface prtor to placerrient of arry fi�l.
Excava#ivns far debris removat shoald be backfltled with struc#urat illl compacted to the
densi#fes described in #t�e "Structurat Fil!" section ofi this report.
We recommend that a member oi our staff evaluate the exposed subgrade cand'rtions
after removal of vegetatian and topsoii stripping is com�ieted and prior to placemenf of
structural fill. The exposed subgrade sotl should be proof-roiled wlth heavy rubber-tired
��
� �
�:_� � ;�:.
��
� .� .
� �:
Landmarlclim.Nor�olr�i.RG
3anuary i 6. 2008
Page 8
equipment during dry weather or probed with a 112-inch-cliame#er steef rod du�ing wet
weather condi�ons.
Any soft,loose or otherwise unsul#abte areas dellneated during praofro�ing or probing
shaufd be recompacted, H practical, ar ovsr-excavated and reptaced with stnactural fili, based
on �t�e recommendations of aur site reptesentative. The areas �of oid fiif rnateria! should be
evaluated duri�g graating opera#+ons #o determine 'rf they need mifigation; recompaction or
removai.
Structurai F�II
A11 materiai placed as f�ii associ�ted with mass gradin�, as utllity trench ba�kfllt� under
buikting areas, or under roadways should be placed as structurat fill. The structura! iiil shouid
be placed in horizontal lifts o# approprlate th�ckness to ailaw adequate and uni#orm
compaction of each �'iffi, Fil! shouid be carnpacted to at least 95 per�ent of MDD (maximum
dry densi�ty as de#ermined in accordance with ASTM D-1557).
The appropr�ate lift thickness will depend on the �Itl characterlstics and compacfion
equipmen# used. We recommend tt�at the appropriate lift thickness be evaluated by our fisid
represer�tative tiu�ing cvnstruction. We recommend that our repsesenta�ve be present during
siie grading activi#ies #o observe the work and per(orm �eld density tests.
Ti�e suitabliity of mater�ai for use as stn�ctural fitl wi11 depend on the grada�on and
moisture content of the soll. As the amount of #ines {materiai passing US No. 20U sieve)
increases, soit becomes increasfigly sensitive to smaq changes in moisture content and
adequate compacilon becomes mare d{fticuit to achieva. During wet i+veather, we
rec.ommend use of wetl-graded sand and gravei with less than 5 percent (by weight) passing
the US No. 2�t3 siev� based on that fraction passing the 3/4inch sleve, sucfi as Gravel
Bacicfili for Walls {9 i# pralonged dry weai#�er prevaiis during #he ea+thwork and
foundation �astallafian phase o# consiructlon, hlghsr flnas content {up to i(3 to 12 percent} wip
be acceptable.
Mate�ta! piaced for structural �Ii shoukl be free of debris� organ#c matter, trash antl
cobbles grea#er than fi-inches in diameter. The moisfure cor�tent of ti�e ftlt material should be
adjusted as necessary #or proper compac#�on.
Suitabtlityr of On-.Site Mater�als as FIl1
During dry weather canst�uc�on, eny non-argantc on-sife sail may be considered for
use as s�vctural fpl; provided it meets the crlterla described above ln the structural fifi seetion
at�d can be compacted as recamm�nded. 1f the soii mate�al is over-optimum M moisiure
co�ent when excavated, It wili be necessary io aerate or dry the so� prior to piacament as
struc�ural fiil. We generally did not observe #he site soils to be excessively mois� a# the time
oi our subsurtace explorat�an program.
The r�aUve outwash soils at the site generaily consist of sand with varying amount� of
gravei, cabbles anal s11t. These soils are generaliy oomparable to "comman pit nM" materia!
and v�n'tl be sui#able for use as st�ucturai f1q pravided the mois#ure coritent is maintained within
4 percent of the op#imum moisture level. The underlying glaciai till soNs contain a higher fines
content and will likely ba unsul�abte for use as stn3c#ural flti du�ng or fotlawing extended
periods o# wet weather.
We recommend that completed graded-areas be �esficted from tra#fic or protected
prior to we# weather conditions. The graded areas may be protected by paving, piaclr�g
aspha#t :tr8a#ed base, a layer of free-draining materiai such as pit run sand and gravet or
c1ea� crushed ro�k materiai eon#alning iess than 5 percent �nes, or some combina�on of the
above.
� �
s� � �
�: _
LandrnarkHm.Norpolnt.RG
January 18, 2008
Page 7
Gu# and FIli Stopes
Aif job site safety issuss and precautions are the responsibiiity of the co��actor
provlding services/work. The foltowing cutlfi0 slope guidelines ate provided for pianning
purposes o�iy.
Temporary cut siopes witl likely be necessary during grading operations or utility
instaflation. As a generai guide, temporary siopes of 1.5H:1V (Horizor�tai:Verticai) or #latter
may be used #ar temporary cu#s +n the upper 3 to 4 teet of the solls tha# are weathered to a
loose/medium dense conditian, where as temporary slopes as steep as 3/4H:i V can be used
in the very dense unweathered giaaai tilL Where ground water sespage is enco�ntered,
fiatter temporary siapes may be required. These guidelines assume that aU su�tace loads are
kept at a mtnimurn distance of at feast one haff ti�e depth of the cut away from the top of the
slope and that significant seepage is not presen# on the slope #ace. Flatter cut slopes wiN be
�ecessary where signi�icant raveting or seepage occurs.
We �ecommend a maximum siope o# 2N:i V for permansnt cut and �f1 siapes in areas
01 medium dense sand and gravel. It shouid be �ecognized that slopes of th(s nature do ravet
and require oc�aslonal maintenance. 1Nhere raveling or maintenance (s unaccepiaWe, we
recommend that flatter stopes or retalnin� sysferns be considered. Whe�e 2N:1V siopas are
not feasiDle ia thesa soiis� retainin� structures should be considered. Whe�e retalning
strucfures are greatar than 4feet in heigh# (bottom of footing #o top vf structure) ar have
slopes af greater than 15 percent above them, they should be engineered.
Foundation Support
6ased on the encourrtered subsurface soi! cond�ions encountered across the site, we
recommend that spread foo#ings for #he new residences be founded on dense to very dense
native g�aciai tiil or on structurai fiit #fiat ex�ends to suitable r�ative soils.
The soi! a# #he base af the excava�ons shoukt be disturbed as 1'�ttie as possibte. Atl
loose, soft or unsuitable mate�ial shoutd be removed or recampaoted, as approprtate. A
representative from our �irm should obs$rve the foundation excavatlons to determ9ne if
suftable bearing surfaces have beer� prepared, particularly tn ihe areas wi�ere the foundativn
wiq be sftuat�l on ltlt maierlal.
We recommend a rntnimum wldih tr� 2 feet for isolated footings and at least 16 inch�s
#or continuous wall footir�gs. Ali footing e1$ments shoutd be embedded at least 78 inches
below grade for frost protection. Foo�ings founded as described above can be designed
using an aHovvable so�i bearing capacity of 2,600 psf (pounds pe� square fvot) for combined
dead ar3d long-t�rm tive loads. The welght of ttie ioofing and any ove�ying bacfcfiU may be
negiect�d. The altowabfe bearing value may be increased by one third #or trar�slent loads
such as Ihose induced by setsmic events or wlnd loads.
La#eral ioads may be reslsted by friction on #he base of footirmgs and floor stabs and as
passlve pressure on the sldes of footings. We recommer�d that an ailowable coefflcient of
friction c�f 0.35 be used to caicuiat8 frictior� between #he concfete and the underlying soil.
Passive pressure may be determined using an allowable equivalent fluid dens�iy of 300 pc#
(pcwnds per cubic f�t}. Factors oi safeiy have been applied to these values.
Vtie estimate t#iat sattlements of #ootings deslgned and constructed as recommended
wfll be less than 1 inch for the anticlpated load condi#ions, w�th differential settlements
befinreen camparabty loaded footings of 1/2 inch or less. Most of the set�ements should
occur essentiaily as foads are being applied. However, dis#urbance of #he faundatlon
sub�rade durin� canstrciction cauld resuit tn iarger se#liamenis than predicted.
��
Floar Siab Support ` '`
�� �. �
� ,,�. _� �-�_
LandmarkHm.Norpolnt.RQ
Januflry 18, 2008
Page 8
Siabs-on-grade, if constructed, should be suppor#ed or� the medium dense native sa7s
or on stru�tural fil! prepared as described above. Any areas of o!d fiil matsrial shouid be
evaluated during grading activity for suitabilily of structural support. Areas of slgn�icant
arganic deb�is shoutd be removed.
Wa recommend that floor slabs be directly underlain by a capiilary break materia! with
min9mum 6-inch thlckness oi coarse sand� pea gravel� or gravel containing less than 3
percent flnes. The drainage material should be ptaced in one lift atzd compac#ed to a�
unyieiding condltlan.
A synthe�c vapor barrisr is recommended to cantrol molsture migra�on through the
slabs. This is of particuiar Importance where moisture migration through the siab is ar� issue,
suct� as where adhesives ars used to anchor carpet or tile to the sfab. A lhin layer of sand
may be placed over the vapor barrier and immediately below the siab to proteci the liner
8uring stesi and/or concrete placemen#.
A subgrade modulus of 400 kcf (kips per cubic f�t) may be used for floor slab design.
We esfimate that settlemeM af the floor siabs designed and cons#�uc#ed as recommended,
wilf be 1/2 inch or less aver a span of 5U #eet.
Pavemer�t Subgrades
Pavement subgrade areas shouid be preparesi as previously described (n the site
preparation sectlon of this report. The prepared subgrade shoutd be evatuated by prc�ofrotling
with a fiuliy-toaded dump t�uck or equivalent palnt load equi�ment. Soft, loose or �rvet areas
that are dlsclosed shouid be recompacted or removed, as approp�iate. Over-excavated areas
shoutd be back�fled wiEh compacted structuraS ftq and sub-base materlal.
SI#e Oralnage
AI! gfaund surfacss, pavemen#s and sidewatks at ihe si#e should be slaped away irom
ths structure, Surface wrater runoff shouid be cor�rolied by a system oi curbs, berms,
drainage swales, and or ca#ch basins� and conveyed to an appropriate discharge po'snt.
Based on our site evaluatian� it is our opin3on that the fifiit�afion of stormwa#er at the s�te
shouid be limi#ed to roo# water #rom tF�e lndivfdual residence, if appropria�e, We unders#and
that rurf-off from the new restden#ia1 dsi�aways and roadway areas will be cotfec#ed arid
conveyed to an engineered stormwa#er detentian pond to be iocated in the southwest comer
of the subject property. Any embankment cons#ruc#Ion required shou{d be completed wtth
suitable siity soils {greafer than 25 percani #ines by weight or minus No. 200 US Sieve).
Ai#ema�vely. the embankment may be lined with a suitable non-permeabie Ilner materiai,
1Nhere ln�ltrativn is utilized tor the individual residences, we recommend an Infittrati�n
rate of 15 minutes per 3nch #or the sandy soiis. An appropr�ate factor of safety shovld be
u#ilized.
1.IMiTATlONS
We have prepared this repo� i�r use by Landma�c H�nes, Inc. and other members of
the deslgn team, #ot use in the desi�n of a portlon of this projeci. The data used in preparing
this repo�t and this repor# shoutd be provided to prospecdve contrac#ors fo� tl�eir bidding or
es�mating purpases only. taur repart, conclusions and interpreta#ions are based on data from
others and Gmited site reconnalssance� a�d should not be constru�d as a vvaman�y ot the
subsurface sbndltions,
Variatians in subsu�iaca cond'fions are passible beiw�en the expiorations and may atso
oc�ur wtth #ime. A c�ntingency for unanticipa#e� cond'�tc�s st�ould be incls�ded in the budget
and schedute. SufiHcient monitortng, iesling and consui#a#ion sho�id be prav�ded by our firm
during constructlan to confirm tha# the conditions encaur�tered are aonsistent with those �
�>>� �
� � _. _�.
�.� � '. �
�� �
,..� r ,.w �-,. � � � , . � _._._„
LendmaricNm.Norpoint.RG
January 18, 2008
f'age 9
indicated by the exploratians, to provide recommendations for design changes shauki the
c:onditions teveated during the wark differ from those an�apated, and ta evaluate whefher
earthwork and foundation Inst,allation aciivities comply w�th contract plans and specffica#ions.
The scope of our senrices does not inciude servic$s related ta environmenta!
remediation and construcfion sa#ety precautions. Dur recommendations are no# intended to
direct the contractor�s methods, technfques, sequences ar procedures, except as specifically
described in our �epoK for conslderatian in design.
it there are arry d�anges in the loads, grades, iocatioris, configurations or type of
factlides to be canstructed, #he concluslons and recommendations presented in this report may
not be fuily appiicabfe. if such r�.hanges afe made, we shouid be ghren the opportur�ity to review
our recommendations and provide wri#ten modfica�ons or verifications, as appraprlate.
♦ ♦ ♦
We have appreciated the opportunity to be o# senrlce to you on this project. lf you have
any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to ca�t at yaur eariisst convenienc8.
Aespec##uAy submitted,
GeoResources, L1C
Srad Biggerstaff, LEG Glen Coad, PE
P�Indpal Prirzc�pal
��08
epa�wac�
podQtard�mrkHrn.NotpdtRHO
Atmd�mm� flpue 1-8�s VidNa+IdoP
Ap�ae 2—She aM E�Ioredao P1sn
Flptae 8—I/6DA SCS 8ofla Map
Hywe4—USfl8tAOp
ii�ura 6—BaRQutlOCatlon 8yatem
Rywe 6—Test PM Lops
�
� � �r
F � �,
EXPIRES 10 ! 3� i o=_,
"a; ,
.
L���RL�$�P��� �.LC
5007 Paciiic Hlghway East, Suite 20
F'de, Washingfon 88424
Phone: 253-896-10� 1
Fax: 253-896-2633
'- ..
�,:
�ii�e iiicinli�y �liap
Norpoint Resldential Piat
Brawns Polnt Ares
Pederai Way, Washingtoa
Fite: Lendmarldim.�forpolt�l.SVH! � danuery 2008
�: �
Not to scais
�ignre 1
APProxima#e Slte �ocation
�
�nc
•u
�� �
�,n�+
APPROXINUI'f@ LOCATICN 8•1 �
OF 80RiNQ
APPROXIMATE LOCRTION TP�1 f
o� Tesr a�r
I�Sqfr
�!Y� 6► WN � . — t v ww � 101p r•
��''�'�`''�...� i • � � �. � i
f �^" r rR--+�•�.!'�"'�„�,�^.� ��� r . SS .. k .. :.'b•;f'L..�_�i r �
���
� ✓." t , . �.-.�-aa_ .1....., .�... • • �' ` r �
/ � ( / r 1 "'�' � , Y � �- ��^.•'�_�• 1 , �"n•�,
`'� I, ' ��' I � °¢ � i y
t ': � �; � i '; , ; �+�; � -•-x,... � �
� � ���� (� ; �w: ��: � � � .. .. �
r V ssr ,+r�x, n �' � ; � t
1 ' � � : r ; ( �r p� ; � i _
, r" `" 1 M ,y 1 `1 ��++•3 ,'� � +��i s�� m' i
arn ; � � � i4 �� � '-�� � j ��� •.S
9 t r � �, , �� ,' 1{ �
I 1 '• � , I . j � t 1 stn'-'-•...._
� jl '� ' f r � 1 �•., �� , '� , �1 ,l, 4; I � � ''� I t
j i ( �� 1 aw_ ' ,.' i r` I `�, �'j,, ,� t I
� _ � _ 1 .��� �� �0; � �� 'r� %Jb.•�.
� . }�. ..N ',. I � .: .7
i i' r � 1 � .,, r i • ; i """�� � '\, `, ; ;'
� ��; �t w��t" ' \ '' I, �` �
�+f, � p ,�. j r , ��� r l � j ' ' f , i ,�ti •�'. � 'S ;�
� � �, � t i `� t �'� ,.,► .. .-
�\ � •. �� `•, � , ; , `, ; �`� ••,. � �
, i � ' '� ? .; , , i i � ,
a � t n �ri� � � i ; � ti � 'I
.� a � i ".�e ns�u ' y • t j �,� �� ,� �y � 'S. � , .
M ' � � • I g•. `
�'. �, � � t� � �1 i . ' ` ' � •1 � +'� j�� � { , , �� ,
° 1 ` • ` "' '� ; �'� t �!' ' ; I ' `'` '.,� �`'�
� i � � ; , ,-.' ? j ' i� �i s �, i �'�.
� �! � � � • : ' '� � � � � . � '� � ;t i • � ' '•,
1` ��� �'� r � � � i 1 t � ,�' � ` i � � ' ` '�' ;
� �, ' ` � ; �1 � 1 ,�
� � j ' ; ' � + 1 , 7 �
( ' '�'� r t � ,� , 1' ' � f • _� _ i` �
s,.. i ; i 't ''. � t� �:, .
"
�,
�_ .
6W.b� 1" • tls'd
QeaResourcea, LI.0 FlQURE 2• Stte Ptan
�( 16 fo 39 PERCENT SLOPE AREA 5p07 PAdflO Hlphway Baet, St�Ee 20 Prole�1 : Napolnt FtNqM�
�3 44 PEfiCENT dA GREATER Fite, Washinpmn 98424 ����Ya�" �
6LOPE AREA ��e: 263�898•1011 F eest WRy, WA
Pa� 253�8e8 2883 �33 CnMt : Len4nmlc tlanes
D6tn :ONI&� JobN:l.pndmerkl�n.NotD�
� �xwi����_ �_______.�
PAGE�flF ��,_
� �'-., :a�t � K -�^r-" „P °
� �j��,c r � � � t _ Y - �� � ! ': C .
� _� z ,,,�, 7 �, 5-x
� � � ��.�' a r `�'� F� r , 'a - .� ��� �. * x 3 , '�3 � • �� x °� �
� �. � �t:Itl t L '' =- �° ",,.�^ - �` a� .� �q;, . � .�-� �� ti � �F�� -a• :v;
X �f� y ��Y�� � �1 r x . ' l �� .r.�{ yJ� f � �.. : �������` ' � _.
� � c�
o�k�� ��� . y � s�€ � �r �f�r 1�....�' � S� � ::�.
_ :� s 3 S( ��� 3 5�...��. - ;�a� , � $� < s J�''7t �"Y '��� f a �
"� f �..f a [�?'-�`'° s. -t ! �f � k� t m P �. � . �• _�.�
c ��, t �, . j'. ��r .. , t��; � � E . >,.�.,,, � �rai K�� -`,d s�_� +2 �'� S " ; �
` 3 k 1 t t ::, f�� �w..�,- r �'�" :" r s r_�:
- '�� ft..��. rr � ..1}t}��`. �' - ' t �L ' � y
�7�.2k .��r � k ' � ,� f r�5 � � ,�,x,_., �,Fr.F �,'' �� c�. � `�,� - �'���
T::r`r�� �k.s +�-�` .. . �`✓ �._- -l� � �����a -1�1 f�. . i �.., jI�`„z.
. � Y?:'� .�� � r � '.� #!` ?fs � 143 k;k'f a`m�` r � - ` r�r.� { � i. �� ;'p � � r � ��� C�
.� �_� �,�� . � � -- . �. -L!� :.�� �� �' �"�r t. ��. ;� `� � i �t ��� « � _� .
a.e�. . .H� .,,f'7.a.= c J4i C -�-
�a.. . � ri ,:v = ` s !� °' �?'?` i� g �a� � a� �F �� .r1'1 �� ;, .+���� ,�' ie � �.� 5 ��� .
�y � :r�(� � € F4 t ,� .� �' � � � � _
4 ' � r ( j,-;..�t'a�3� x �. . , s` s � � �.rsy� �y �: k,. £ �` t �.. '"` _ ' .,
_ `\. .i» °� � � �df��i.-.- t r�. i�. "��j4' I� �`(� � -�`� °* `
t g-� ,� #. , '�'+ ..!-�Ek s `��9F� � tf �1��� �f „ �i� .Lt y ' '�
I ����= tr ,,� " b� _� ��k3� $ <� f+� Y ��iE,�'" ti'�'�`a+�f Jl.�k ��it p `%'� t , � `� =`•
` �c+#x - s R� ' �.`; k ... . x e � y{ ,�` � v �k ilCTG �,� 1 r� � � '� , �� .. .'
� �I - ° �. .�;� 3��.c�� . $ F '�� a *�ii g' i� � 6 sax;; . .. - 3tt1'w: � .
� �r � ~ 3 : c { . -'z' � • c t ;� �. � ,v v � q� c :. i '' `j � -;: �' • r+�=. sr� a,- � E `� , �
b� -, L` P�f A' .���,, � ,�?' Y � l
� �'� V`� u e�+ � <. , ������ � ?;� y �' •`A`��„ �J t {z 1'}!� S c 4 E - r J -` � � �� � .�. �. :
'� �i �' ' � �.�.�? '� =x+�= a� ' 1 �" R � �, ,
( rJ ��� , s ` � '� , _.- k �L'� . � � �� ' � 1 � i...xa �� y i �� 3 t E � �. ;
� " } �� �
I � �>i�. + r t .:< <' � .: 'i 4 ��,��:�-� t � c 'R'�¢ r tiY tl � ^r � �. � .
f.r�g - � r� �� ` � �.g e1f� '�i� �^waw'.��t � �5i1`� .— y`E : ¢_ '� �.��� �.s"
F %. �° ..�� n., �'6 �'', 't.+rr f e
.4ns . � ` ��w, f �F�' -. � '�G''���f��'ys ��� Z.§� �� `� . � : �� ° t .' ^+��.,� . -
I . D � 'x, �: �`� . . i T . 4 .�` 4 '9C 4rr c�9im R'�� 4F. F � � lT � i
g � � � �� 't- � `�' a s �� i ' a z.. �. i t ���t-r:
�'I" c h"" . F i� .-:y ,�s..-' �SY ... t.` i !{ 1 i 3�7' � 4 f� S sk .
^�t +y �
` � 4 � � € �
�� � ':� ��$t �� � 1.�� . �� � ~` YW� "�`�{ L.`` � v a ��"�.... .'�'� � � i '.e ^; rZ-'�
I T "` 3� y -. �'�.,'�j � �T, 3 � '� z�'�� � �'a. F . sf,..,. /�� �� °$ -� "` r c
i:..'E t"y,,,_�"i � C T� .rL�."'a.� Y �F �'��� s �r f? i � S s R_2,... c t �, i
��,r.,_ � ��., ter� f , t. � s �. � , � ° � `��€� :"� r r s ." r �, s ,
{ � , f t � � t '` ^' E � � � r ' ; � �
( ��'�.�. e$�fi .��'l� ° 'X � . r .� a. � a � ,{ .. _. '� �'t > � • �y t i� ' s � �.
'{ s � {r � �i �` s . J � � `�`. �rt, a y � y z ;' •.. � � � ,� r � � .
I � �! y '' ' � C q
S'4 � �.�s� �1if`t� •� t �' ... � fi' ��. � O�z .�� (A �� 8� � _fl� '" =�
f °� fT. �� .r tl'. . E`' : i .E ,� . . . g t�� .�} '� � 5 L` . '� . - f" r ' j � i � '
L , t � � �^ : .' a
r.�'s� ���+� �s J . : aSw � _ 4 .: �^ �:`" $ ; � `�§$ �� #��L°rc,._..w.
i dc-�� �1��t a � i '� A� � �t� - y , ti � . � :. B - �� y ���s�' � � �,� � t E �, ry
� � �, � .P' _. . �°�k t' �^� ��. � t.:'+�"a � _:e.x � t''
E b�..f -�tt � i ��'! a �� ; , > we�w���, ti� � � ? ��6,� i ��
� :r � �,,`k. ;.a � t � t 6g.e..,�-� t(� .£et � s[ � "� 4....f" { •' . � 1 '°�- C � � 3r ;� � ��4
��r:�� ��;- �}z ��F��b- :J.� � �(� t �.� 1st� .y�. i�,�� u� y�c t�.. � i� � � � t `''�' , ,t . � :' � p ,y`��
.f �.. � � v , , .,;d v:e;- . :. ,r�^.a��_ F�h I r ��� r .. . S , . � � �:. �.
�airt,,,.3 J f�� f. � ` ) R +qkV� { � 13 I y F �
Fi3� a.+eY s'_ �S � �� ' �' �4^P^�5�`-�;�,�``+4{�t F�ss�! �:-.. � �i - ��� 1 � � t� � ` � 5
I� r. K -, �� x �.�u a �i .. . '�t Z � � .
� � �� � �� - t � t �'� '�"t �t4'�.�� s�r` g �` � 3 �° � � ` 3'y 'k ;�.� � t � . z .:
�� ��I �( ��. � � t��r ��� # `;aea- `t r . �r a, � f i. :
,,�� , t i 5! `�°'' _..% �°�1 ..F .�� S f i � S a
t�g"; 4Jd `�t$ ac 1 ���" �.C?� � ��,`.��i�c� ' �'" i�`�� z { �� 0` 1 �' . �� �'�„! , 1 � �'%p. .� :a ' Ej yj
i�.- . ., 4 .. t i t t .�: t rr� : � �, �.,'.,� `= 4 � �,'�n-'= � "•,`s -� .. . 1 � 4 �-�. . ` s . �
� ��: µ�-�.a� � � �, �� � ��� i��` � � ♦J � � 1♦ . ss�= _ �. .
�� ����� ,��� 1 L�.wLJ1Yf'.y�.� �I�,�i�.. �' I�iGlJi ���• ��� .€�.
"t'Q � g� s �� t�. `t .e g., �t " ?, � �, F �`r > f.e : 2
, � .,_ . �._.. :�.... y .. _ �•��.�._:_�:�� � :,� :_
Excerp#s from the
Geologlc map uf the Tacoma Nor�h 7.5-mfnute Quadrangie, Washington: U.S
Troost, KG., Boofh, D.B., and 8orden, R.K.
�
� �
S
�eoAesources, LL�
5007 Paci�ic Highway East, Su3te 20
Fife. Washington 98424
Phone: 253-896-10i 1
Fax: 253-896-2�i3
�
_ . w .,..
U�C�� �eoiogtc �ap
Norpotnt Resider�ial P!a#
Browns Point Area
Federal Way, Washington
Fll� LandmarkHta.t�orpol�ttUSGS + .lat�t�ry 21l08
°__ �
Not to scele
Fl�t+re 4
Approximate Slte Locatian
SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTE(Vf
MAJOR �tViStONS GROUP GROUP NAME
SYMBOL
(�HAVA CLEAN QW WBL-flRADED t3RAVEl. FlNETO COARSE
QRAVEI. ORAVEL
COAHSE QP POOFtLY-0RADEO (�AAAVEI.
dFl14WED More !t� 5096
soas or coarse F��t►«, Q�,ava. onn s��nr ow4va.
Retah�ed on wmi I�NEs
No. a sleve
GC (xAY�Y GRAVEL
Moce �an 509b SAND CLEAN SAND SW WBl-(3RADE0 SAMD� �INE TO COAASE SAND
Retalned on
Na 200 Sl�vo SP POORLY-0RAUEU SAND
Illtore ihan fi096 �
ot coarse F,ac�On saND sM siLilr sA�fD
Pesses WITti FINES
No. 4 Sieve SC f�.AYEY SAND
S1LT AND t�AY lNORt�ANlC ML SILT
FlNE C!. ClAY
GRAINID
SOILS (.fquM l3�nR
i.ess lhan 5(? ORQANIG OL OR(3ANIC 51LT. OAt�AN1C qAY
SlLT AND ClAY INOAGANIG MN SIL.T OF H�GH PLASTICITY, ELASTlC SitT
Mora U�an 50°,�
Passes CH CLAY OF H1L�H PLASTiCIN, FAT CiAY
tJu. 200 Sieve �y�} Lltr�� .
60 or more OHGANIC OH ORflAiVIC Ci.AY, OAt�+WlC SILT
Ii1t3HLY ORt3AN1C SOILS PT PEAT
NOTES:
1.
2
9.
F1eid classi�oa;�w► is based on vistral examinatian oi sotl
&� �era1 accadance with ASTM D2488-90.
Soti ctass�ation t�g lebaraiory tesfs is based o►a
ASTM D2A87-80.
Desari�ao ot soll denstly or consist�r are based on
tnterptetatian at 6knnt cotmt datR, vls�l appaarance ot
solis. and or test data.
SO1L MOtSTURE MflDlFlEAS:
!3ry- Abse�ce af moisturs. dry to the toucft
Mois� �emp� but no vis�le water
W8t• Vr9�I6�TB8 WAtBTaf 88�N8�8d, p9lJ8�IY80� �S
obtained irom below weter table
. �-�� �� � - ��
-- � , _
GeoResflurces, LLC
5007 Paaific Highway Eest s�,�te za
Fite, Wast�ngton 98424
Phone: 253-896-101 '!
Fax: 253-896-2633
Soll Classlfica#ion System
Norpolr�t RealdeMiai Plst
Browns Po1M Area
Federal Way, Washington
J08� landmarlcHm.NarpoMt.U3C8 � Jenuary 2QD8 � Figure 8
Test Pl# TP -'! Location: r�o►thwest site area (SEE Figure 2)
Deoth (�.1 Son Twe Descriptior+
0.0 - 0.5 DufflTopsoil.
0.5 - 3.5 • SP Org brown SAND w�1h gravei (bose to medium danse, mdst)
3.6 - 4.5 SM 8rown si(ty SAND wtth gravel, occaslonal cobblss {medlum dense
to dense, moisty. {wea tiil?)
4.5 - b.5 SM Bm Gry sltty SAND w/ gvl, cobbfes (dense, motst to damp) {wea till?)
M1fiDf f�Vltig Ob.SBN@Cl.
No graundwaier seepage observed-
� Test Pit TP 2 tocatton westem property line {SEE Figure 2)
Der�th (ft.L So� Twe Descri�#ion
� 0.0 - 3.5 SP Org brav+m SAND witt� gravel� min. si�� oa�slana4 cobbles, organics (roots)
{toase ta med. dense, mo3s#)
3.5 -�A SM Gray brawri sltty SAND with gravel, ocxasionat cabbles, (dense, mo�#}
(local mot�ing)
� 4.0 - 6.8 SM Brown/Gray sliry SAND w/ grave� cobbles (dense, molst)
Minos caving abserved.
No groundwater seepage observed
� Test Ptt 'fP� �ocauon east t�t TP-1 (SEE Flgure 2)
pepth (fi.) Soii Ti►pe Descriati�n
( 0.0 - 0,5 � DuHli`opsoll
0.5 - 3.5 SP Org brown SAND w�th gravel occasio�ai cobbies, organks
(loase tfl mad. dense, maist).
3.5 - 5.0 SM Gray brown sli#y SAND w�h oxidized graval, Interbedded cearse sand lanses
� (dense, maist). �
Mlnor cav�g observed.
I No groundwater seepage abserved
'�es# Pit TP l.ocation SW site area (SEE Ftgure 2j
� ,�, Deuth �ft.) So8 Tvr�e Description
t}A - 0.5 Dtrfflfapsoil.
U.5 - 5,5 SP Org brown SAND wft� sili, gravel, occ. boulders (iaose to med. dense,
molst)
� 5.5 - S,5 SM Gray sllly SAND wtth gravel (dertise to v. dense. mois� (t�1?}
Term}nated a! 101� teet bgs.
No caving observed.
No groundwafer seepage observed.
Sample (S-3) taken a# 10 teet below ground surface.
GeoResources, LLG
5047 Paciific H�ghway East, Sulle 20
�Ne, tNasMngton 98424
Phane; 253-8�-io9�f
Fax: 253-896-2533
- . ��
, � � ��
; � , ,. _ �: �.
Tes# Pit Logs
Norpolnt Residential Si#e
Federal Way, Washington
,�os� �nam��m.�w�.� � a�y �e � F� s
sEC vi
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
Any proposed TESP facilities wiil be designed per City of Federai Way's requirements
during the final design phase of the project.
_ .� �
� F � s`5 ���� s
- — _ `� ; ��r;
6-1
APPENQtX
�� �_
_ �,.� �:
��
�
�-.
_ .� _
KCRTS Output
Pond Sizing per KCSWDM Section 3.2.2
Pre-Developed Land Use Condition
3_13 0.00 0.000000
0.00 0.00 0.000000
0.00 0.00 0_OOOOOD
0.00 0.00 0.000000
0.00 0.00 0.000000
0.00 0.00 0.000000
0.00 0.00 0.000000
0.00 0.00 0.000000
predev.tsf
ST 1.00000
Flow Frequency Analysis
Ti.me Series File:predev.tsf
Project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates---
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak
(CFS)
0.197 2 2109/Ol 18:00
0.054 7 1/06/02 3:00
0.147 4 2/28/03 3:00
0.005 8 3/29/09 20_00
0.087 6 1/05I05 8:00
0.151 3 1118/06 21:00
0.128 S 11/24/06 4:00
0.252 1 1/09/08 9:00
Computed Peaks
Till Forest
Till Pasture
Till Grass
Outwash Forest
Outwash Pasture
Outwash Grass
Wetland
Impervious
Frequency
- - Rank
-----Flow
- - Peaks
(CFS)
0.252
0.197
0.151
0.147
0.128
0.087
0.054
0.005
0.234
1
L
3
4
5
6
7
8
Developed Land Use Condition
o.00 o.00 o.000000
0.00 0.00 0.000000
1.05 0_00 0.000000
0.00 0.00 0.000000
0.00 0.00 0.000000
0.00 0.00 0.000000
0.00 0.00 0.000000
2.03 0.00 0.000000
dev.tsf
ST 1.00000
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:dev.tsf
Project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates---
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak
(CFS)
0.586 6 2/09I01 2:00
0.481 8 1/OS/02 16:00
0.704 3 2/27/03 7:00
0.525 7 8I26/09 2:00
0.632 4 10I28/09 16:00
0.623 5 1/18/06 16:00
0.764 2 10/26/a6 0:00
1.18 1 1/09/08 6:00
Computed Peaks
Till Forest
Till Pasture
Till Grass
Outwash Forest
Outwash Pasture
Outwash Grass
Wetland
Impervious
-----Flow
- - Peaks
(CFS)
1.18
0.764
0.704
^ 0.632
D.623
0.586
0.525
0.481
i.D4
A-i
Frequency
- - Ran
1
2
3
9
5
6
7
Analysis-------
Return Prob
Period
100.00 0.990
25.00 0.950
10.00 0.900
5.00 0.800
3.00 0.667
2.00 0.500
1.30 0.231
1.10 0.091
50.00 0.980
�� � � �_ .
Analysis-------
k Return Prob
Period
100.00 0.990
25.00 0.960
10.00 0.900
5.00 0.800
3.00 a.667
2.00 0.500
1.30 0.231
1.10 0.091
50.00 0.980
� : - ��.
`:_: �;__
Bypass Land Use Condition
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
bypass.tsf
ST 1.00000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0_000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
Till Forest
Till Pasture
Till Grass
Outwash Forest
Outwash Pasture
Outwash Grass
Wetland
Impervious
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:bypass.tsf
Project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates---
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak
(CFS)
0.012 7 2/09/Ol 2:00
0.011 8 I/05/02 16:00
0.015 3 12/08/02 18:00
0.012 6 8/26/04 2:00
0.015 4 10/28/04 16:00
O.a13 5 1/18/06 16:00
0.018 2 10/26/06 0:00
0.023 1 1/09/08 6:00
Computed Peaks
Reter�tion/Detention Facllity
Type of Facility:
Side Slope:
Pond Bottom Length:
Pond Bottom Width:
Pond Bottom Area:
Top Area at 1 ft. FB:
Effective Storage Depth:
Stage 0 Elevation:
Storage Volume:
Riser Head:
Riser Diameter:
Number of orifices:
-----Flow Frequency Analysis-------
- - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob
(CFS) • Period
0.023 1 100.00 0.990
0.018 2 25.00 0.960
0.015 3 10.00 0.900
0.015 4 5.00 0.800
0.013 5 3.00 0.667
0.012 6 2.00 0.500
0.012 7 1.30 0.231
0.011 8 1.10 0.091
0.022 50.00 0.980
Detention Pond
3.00 H:lv
88.56 ft
29.52 ft
2614. sq. ft
8161. sq. ft
0.187 acres
5.00 ft
901.00 ft
23427. cu. ft
0.538 ac-ft
5.00 ft
12.00 inches
2
Orifice # Height Diameter
(ft) (in)
1 0.00 1.32
2 4.00 1.26
Top Notch Weir: None
Outflow Rating Curve: None
Stage
(ft)
0.00
J.ul
0.03
0.04
0.05
Full Head
Discharge
(CFS)
0.105
0.093
Pipe
Diameter
tin)
4_0
� � �� �
Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation
(ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs)
901.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.00
9Gi.01 �6. �.00i u.u05 O.OG
901.03 79. 0.002 0.008 0.00
901.09 105. 0.002 0_O10 0.00
901.05 132. 0.003 0.011 0.00
Surf Area
(sq. ft)
2619.
2621.
2636.
2643.
2650.
��
�` �'.
A-2
o.o�
o.os
0.10
0.11
0.21
0.31
0.41
0.51
O.bl
0.71
0.81
0.91
1.01
l.11
1.21
1.31
1.41
1.51
1.61
1.71
1.81
1.91
2.01
2.11
2.21
2.31
2.4i
2.51
2.51
2.71
2.81
2.91
3.01
3.11
3.21
3.31
3.41
3.51
3.61
3.71
3.81
3.91
4.00
4.01
4.03
4.09
9.05
9.07
9.08
4.09
9.11
4.12
9.22
4.32
4.42
4.52
4.62
4.72
4.82
4.92
5.00
5.10
5.20
9D1.07
901.08
901.10
901.11
901.21
901.31
901.41
901.51
901.61
901.71
901.81
901.91
902.01
902_11
902.21
902.31
902.91
902.51
902.61
902.71
902.81
902_91
903.01
903.11
903.21
903.31
903.41
903.51
903.61
903.71
903.81
903.91
904.01
904.11
904.21
904.31
904.41
909.51
904.61
904.71
904.81
904.91
905.00
905.01
905.03
905.04
905.05
905.07
905.08
905.09
905.11
905.12
9a5.22
905.32
905.42
905.52
905.62
905.72
905.82
°.05.92
906.00
906.i0
906.20
185_
211.
265.
292.
565.
845.
1132.
1427.
1729.
2039.
2356.
2681.
3014.
3355.
3703.
9060.
4924.
4797.
5177_
5566_
59b3.
6369.
6783.
7206.
7637.
8077.
8526.
8983.
9450.
9925.
10909.
10903.
11406.
11917.
12439.
12969.
13509.
14059.
14618.
15187.
15766.
16355.
16893.
16953.
17074.
17134.
17195.
17317.
17378.
17439.
17561.
i7623.
18242.
18872.
19512.
20162.
20822.
21493.
22174.
228b&.
23427.
24i38.
24860.
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.013
0.019
0.026
0.033
0.040
0.047
0.054
0.062
0.069
0.077
0.085
0.093
O.la2
0.110
0.119
0.128
0.137
0.196
0.156
0.165
0.175
0.185
0.196
0.206
0.217
0.228
0.239
0.250
0.262
0.274
0.286
0.298
0.310
0.323
0.336
0.349
0.362
0.375
0.388
0.389
0.392
0.393
Q.395
0.398
0.399
0.400
0.403
0.405
0.419
0.933
0.448
0.963
0.978
0.993
0.509
v^.525
0.538
0.554
0.571
o.ei�
0.013
0.015
0.016
0.022
0.026
0.030
0.039
0.037
0.040
0.092
0.045
0.04�
0.049
0.052
0.054
0.056
C.058
0.060
0.061
0.063
0.065
0.067
0.068
0.070
0.071
0.073
0.079
0.076
0.077
0.079
0.080
0.081
0.083
0.084
0_085
0.087
0.088
0.089
0.090
0.092
0.093
0.094
0.099
0.095
0.097
O.lOC
0.103
0.107
0.108
0.109
0.110
0.11�
0.122
0.127
0.131
0.135
0.139
0.142
G.14o"
0.198
0.460
1.030
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
D.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0_00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2669.
2671.
2685.
2693.
2765.
2837.
2911_
2985.
3060.
3135.
3212.
3289.
3367.
3495.
3524.
3609_
3685.
3766.
3848.
3931.
9015.
4099.
4184.
9269.
4356.
4493.
453?.
4619.
4709.
4799.
4889.
4981.
5073_
5166.
5259.
5354.
5449_
5544.
5691.
5738.
5836.
5935.
6024.
b034.
6054.
6069.
6074.
6094.
6109.
6114.
6134.
6144.
6245.
6347.
6449.
6552.
6656.
6760.
6865.
657i.
7057.
7164.
7272.
A-3 .� � � , _ �,� _
¢ h � ;-
3.� �., �;_ _
��
� �
5.30
5.40
5.50
5.60
5.70
5.80
5.90
6.00
6.10
6.20
6.30
6.40
6.50
6.60
6.70
6.80
6. 90
7.00
Hyd Inflow
1
2
3
9
5
6
7
8
Hyd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1.18
0.59
0.59
0.62
0.70
0.37
0.98
0.53
906.30
906.40
905.50
906.60
906.70
906.80
906.90
907.00
907.10
907.20
907.30
907.40
907.50
907.60
907.70
907.80
907.90
908.00
Outflow
R/D Facility
Outflow
0.89
0.42
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.89
0.42
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.09
0.08
0.07
25592.
26336_
27090.
27856.
28633.
29420.
30219.
31030.
31852.
32685.
33530.
34386_
35254.
36134.
37026.
37930.
38846.
39773.
0.588
0.605
0.622
0.639
0.657
0.675
0.694
0.712
0.731
0.750
0.770
0.789
0.809
0.830
0.850
0.871
0.892
0.913
Peak
Stage Elev
5.18 906.18
5.09 906.09
5.00 906.00
4.70 905.70
9.56 905.56
3.65 904.65
2.70 903.70
2.18 903.18
Reservoir
Inflow
�*�, �+.:�
****+**�
*�«***�*
***��**�
���:�*+*�
***�**��
***��*��
���***�*
1.760
2.550
2.890
3.100
3.330
3.550
3.760
3.960
4.150
4.320
4.500
4.660
4.820
4.970
5.120
5.270
5.410
5.550
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0_00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Storage
(Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft)
24687. 0.56�
24048. 0.552
23424. 0.538
21338. 0.490
20456. 0.970
14858. 0.341
9901. 0.227
7527. 0.173
7380.
7490.
�b00.
7711.
7822.
7939.
8097.
8161.
8275.
8391.
8506.
8623.
8740.
8858.
8977.
9096.
9217.
9338.
POC Outflow
Target Caic
******* 0.91
******* 0.43
0.15 0.15
�+�**t* p.19
******* 0.14
0.09 0.09
******* 0.08
******* 0.07
Tributary
Inflow
G.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
----------------------------------
Route Time Series through Facility
Inflow Time Series File:dev.tsf
Outflow Time Series File:rdout
POC Time Series File:dsout
Inflow/Outflow Analysis
Peak Inflow Discharge:
Peak Outflow Discharge:
Peak Reservoir Stage:
Peak Reservoir Elev:
Peak Reservoir Storage:
1.18 CFS at
0.893 CFS at
5-18 Ft
906.18 Ft
24687. Cu-Ft
0.567 Ac-Ft
�
� � A � .
� � �'
_�
6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
9:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Add Time Series:bypass.tsf
Peak Summed Discharge: 0.912 CFS at 9:00 on Jar� 9 in Year 8
Point of Compliance File:dsout.tsf
0
� f
�, �.
A-4
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:rdout.tsf
Project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates---
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak
(CFS)
0.420 2 2/09/O1 16:00
0.077 7 12/28/O1 17:00
0.133 S 2/28/03 7:00
0.069 8 8/26I04 6:00
0.089 6 1/05/05 15:00
0.138 4 1/18/06 23:00
0.148 3 11/29/06 8:00
0.893 1 1/09/08 9:00
Computed Peaks
FLow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:dsout.tsf
Project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates---
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak
(CFS)
0.426 2 2/09/O1 16:D0
0.079 7 12/28/O1 16:00
0.135 5 2/28103 6:00
0.072 8 8/26/04 4:00
0.092 6 1/05/05 8:00
0.140 4 1/18/06 21:00
0.152 3 11/24/06 6:00
0.912 1 1/09/08 9:00
Computed Feaics
-----Flow Frequency Analysis-------
- - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob
{CFS) (ft) Period
0.893 5.18 1 100.00 0.990
0.420 5_09 2 25.00 0.960
0_148 5.00 3 10.00 0.900
0.138 4.70 9 5.00 0.800
0.133 4.56 5 3.00 0.667
0.089 3.65 6 2.00 0.500
0.077 2.70 7 1.30 0.231
0.069 2.18 8 1.10 0.091
0_735 5.15 50.00 0.980
-----Flow Frequency Analysis-------
- - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob
(CFS) Period
0.912 1 100.00 0.990
0.926 2 25.00 0.960
0.152 3 10.00 0.900
0.140 4 5.00 0.800
0.135 5 3.00 0.667
0_092 6 2.00 0.500
0.079 7 1.30 0.231
0.072 8 1..10 0.091
0.750 SO.UO 0.980
���� 3 "• , � .���...
A-5
: �'
�., ��� � `� � � �!� . -�. r�.�.��..
.,, ��,.r , .. � �� �'°` �
:. �_ :• .�
_ � ,.
SCHOOL ACCESS ANALYSIS
For
Norpoint Heights
Subdivision
Prepared For
Landmark Homes
PO Box 26116
Federal Way, WA 98093-3116
ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC.
No.1453-007-002
January 2008
i� ' � "�Lr- 4.� � �i i�.,�n.,� i � ., :
,�. k
s' �` 1:.- �..-'v'
.�A�v� � � ��(��
?wd � F §.,P a�"��_.f<.. ._ . ,
u i.T �
_ F
. - , ¢
� a �
.`.. � _ , ' ..__.._..-_.____ '_.
.. �
:.: n e �f �- ....__._.._.....---_"°'_- _"
�'�`'�,��_ � ��P� ��
� r �i � _. ,��'...,._ a� . `., �.�.�.._.,
T14BLE OF CONTENTS
I. Project Overview
11. Existing Condiiions
lil. Mftiga�on Recommendations
Appendix
Overail Site Map
Sherwood Forest Elementary School Boundary Map
Illahee Middle Schoo! Boundary Map
Todd Beamer High School Boundary map
Photos
�esm-jobs1145310021documentl lysis.doc
���-.
�.
�� . � � � - .- -._ _ ..
,� .-, k
. _ . ; ,. .._ ......> . ' � . � �
�
- - • SEC110N !
PR4JECT OVERVIEW
SECTION 1
PROJECT OVERVIEW
The following is a student access analysis for this project
� .
_,
� � � � =_.
4�
� _ __ _ .
The proposed project, Norpoint Heights Subdivision, is located west of 25"'
Avenue S.W, south of S.W. 345th Place, north of SW 356"' St and west of Norpoint
Way NE in Tacoma, containing appro�amately 3.0 acres. The proposed plat shows
14 single family residential lots.
This project will be served by the foilowing schools:
Sherwood Forest Elementary School - The proposed project is outside the 1
mile radius so the students will receive school bus transportafion. The
ciosest existing bus stop is located at 27�' Avenue S.W. and 351 � Piace, see
map.
Iliahee Middie School - The proposed project is outside of the 1 mile radius
so the students will receive school bus transportation. The closest existing
bus stop is located at 27�' Avenue S.W. and 351 St Place, see map.
Todd Beamer High Schooi- The proposed project is outside the 1 mile
radius so the students will receive school bus transpor#ation. The closest
existing bus stop is located at S.W. 349 at 2609 (Coronado Par�
See school boundary maps in Appendix
' �
� -�
:` �
_
� `�*. -
�
r- .,�=
SECTION 11
EXISIING CONDI110NS
SECTION II
EXISTING CONDITIONS
��,
4
- � .. ., �"::, . _ . . _.
�;
� . � Y
.�:�_ _ _ -
The existing student access route conditions are documented with a description,
overail location map and photos located in #his report
This site is somewhat isolated because access will be off Nor�oint Way in
Tacoma Although a pedestrian access is proposed to connect to 25 Ave. SW, the
existing school bus stops are not near this area Access to the existing school bus
stops are somewhat biocked by a newly constructed water quality swale along
Norpoint Way.
The access to Sherwood Forest Elementary School bus stop is only availabie by
crossing a newly constructed biofiltration swale built for the Norpoint Way
improvements. If this swale was crossable, students would come out of this
development and follow the sidewalks along Norpoint Way� to the non-existent
intersection with 27�' Ave. SW. There are sidewalks along 27 Ave. SW to the bus
pick-up point about a block away. The bus stop is at 27�' Ave. SW and SW 351 �
Place.
There are sidewaiks on all the roads except over the biofiltration swale between
Norpoint Way and the end of 27"' Ave. SW. It appears pedestrians have been
crossing the swale at this point
See photos #1 thru 4 showing the access route and pick-up areas.
The middle schoo! bus stop for Illahee Junior High School students is at the same
location as the Sherwood Forest Elementary School, 27"' Ave. S.W. and SW 351 �
Place. (See above)
The high schooi bus stop for Todd Beamer High School students is at S.W. 348�'.
Piace a# 2609 (Coronado Par� This site is north of this project and north of the
elementary and middie school bus stop, see map. (See photo #2)
.-=;,..
�
.�'`,°,
_ e� . ; � �.�
SEC110N 11!
MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS
_ �
��
SECTION III
MITIGATiOId RECOMMEIdDAl10NS
� ��
.�:�.
The foilowing is a proposal from the developer for access to al! of the school bus
pick up locations.
It appears the pedestrian access to all the bus stops in Federal Way� would require
pedestrian improvements between Norpoint Way and the end of 27 Ave. SW. This
wouid require about 75 feet of new sidewaiks and a wooden bridge over the newly
constructed biofiltration swale along Norpoint Way. There is no other realistic
access to the exisiing school bus stops from this proposed development
See photos # 5 & 6.
��.� .
�
z f �.�
::., . ;..:..� ...,: , . .._.__.. . .._.... ... ..___.,
* 4 : .-..
e.n ; ..'.� + ` €._ f� � ���
wc . L: � T �.� _:.
±"' �,,_ � .,... �_ _�_. .. _ .._.-.:
. a` « _, .i .> >..�..,..p. . _ �?
PHOTO # 1 - PICK-UP AREA
PHOTO # 2 - PICK-UP AREA
�� .� .
�
� ,. ,.
�- �'.. ---_. _
� � �.y. � � ��
�` �
_ . �, � � �-� . , c;._ ._ -- - �" — -
PHOTO # 3 - WALKING ROUTES
PHOTO # 4 - WALKING ROUTES
�,.
��::
PHOTO # 5 - CROSSING AREA � � � ` � R �
.
�. '� _� � �
PHOTO # 6 - CROSSING AREA
Uw.wwiwl Y�iwhfa
�� �. ti 4 � - : '�:�
, ,�;� Y i i , . � ''
�w. z�� t � � � � � �
�.:� � A `am� le�+ .. ....- _" ' _ ' . . � �
APPENDIX
: ,. � � . ., ';` A�
.�� .� � "` � ___
. , ' � i� � � T �_
�� • � � .�
D ��` � '" � '� � �" �
� , ,�, � ;
�� m �} - �'�a
y G i :;ry �
E'�' ="� � 1� �:� �
� ' x e�
tiiM OT WZJO► - - a � ' l �
,/ -. 14^ F' ! c .,� _, , y i s.-+1� �� �1
,. . "'� �'1 p ti �.�
� r : f� e+�.
� h,}�" � d ,�! 1�51 ���
.� yg ��
� �g�'� �e � �' ;' � �fy
.. :�� y� � 7.
n� L4' �
E �
'-'�i ^' , T. , k"w p rim � PYEfl'�F
' �" �OU,�XY
'�itN H^CQSJ�" i scM
, •;;il ;.^' I r ` 1 r; i��: F`.`"�. �3,1 n p;h¢ re;
..�
IID�DLE �CH�OL
I�K-�fP AT 2TTH
VE.�W AND 8W
51�1'PL
L�M�NTAF�'Y
GHQQL PI.CK-IiP
T �7TH AVE.SWV
T SVN 35`i �T ST.
0
PR�JECT SITE
HIGH SCHO�L PICK-UP AT S1N349TH AT 2609 COR�NADQ PARK
ELEMENTART SCHOOL PICK-UP AT SW 349TH PL AT CO.RONAQO
PARK
u a Rv:,7 • �
Ky � r±Jfp4
� �:,5':� ��7 f� :iG
` ASHF
��,.
��
�..
� � +�
�I��' /}!
- � ��- .�-..�.;
� � �;
�7'� a""` {�, : kM, rY .t �,
� ,y�Nl'{
� , �.*, ��ta ;
RS,,.o a�` .. . „ , i
�.!� �
• �, A{>fy t� Fk �y ' YfP +
a i' , wm rr � y�NM 6Y 96�IP �.
.� � ;��
wv yy k"' l""�.l1.1
'�. � .... 71�'
MY�iMa'MRME ,
a' qr. { C"'a.� '� � y � � F � � Jr � ' � .'iY4YP
� "� `�"S� M � �"1�W9.rG�� ; _.
�� l
,y k >,�: � 1 ��
r� n�o
M � � ;; � �ro
�; l i ' i r ? z ., � � � 7
��� ;.��
pe
....� , ..:,.. � ,.� ....:..... �� �...... � .. . . .. �, . i VfI
i�,, i ��ro
� �1►''JS9fTA'ST - - - �'�"��
_._ ;
^ � �� $ � H �
5
4 . � � . ....�, i � �.:..
: M � .,..I .� .. .'.� , ,, -r.._� .{'_"^
N�RPOINT HE�IGHTS SCH�OL ACCES� REVIE'W. 1-9-08
a Yta,.
� �a� �
�.� � � �
� � '�� ;"� ��t� �fi�
4 y y �� 1
d� ^` �e r� �—
� 31 I, � N � , ...,..
� ,,�-
� �; �� � � r
.�' { Fq�� � � y � � �
4.�'vi �� �"G. a�4P.--
�,as � „R „�,,. : p �%t,u i �
�, ; � � .�. �^ �n A ' ,,
s�81, � � � i �' ��' Y :'
� * sT ` '�`�
�f �k - �
u7 � � t d �^ {
� hM �.`.� ro A `^� , R �, � .(:7
� � �' � '
��.�, � �. � x':� ...
�. . e
^� �� "�'�
f
�.' ,� . °..,
Nw � � ,
y �_
�
¢,» _
�� �E t
�:,, �
��...
��.,..,. �:t�s
,"�°
;�� :
;�
-��°
����
�.�,�
��
.,..�,�,v
��'���
P ''.
��
��
� � � �
� ,� � } �p� . �...
NAR
�'�
�
dfrJa h%�;
. ..;p . , X`;
�lementar,r �chc�ol ��undar9es
�'liddle �c�on1 8c�ndaryes
� 9 �legend
Boundaflrs
Q ttar�oeM�BrJheet. '�---
Q �qmMid�le&eoae
� 6ahrml��id:ta9rJOOl
� Saoq�ei�mAl6dde8tl�e�6
.� Ba�nEtie��ot�
.� .40qtwyrtllM�lfYtlBUIOr/
_.„�
! ;�
. . �.. . ���.��
M�
!�
k ,ti
;.�;;
High School Baundaries
r rtv.�r �v �
� Leqend
sea�nok
9cu�daAea
�� �
.�. FadrMlMa!'
flioes �Y�rrl
� TaddOe�ns ��-�++�
rxr,+N^
+ r. `
�a. `'r"'h.
��
"� ; Y �..�.�.H x .
��� �...�
�,� :
��'4'��. k.,�,�
�#
+ i
�� � ��
��
r��
�.;M1.;,�" �.
31405 18th Ave. So.
Federal Way, WA
98003-SA33
Te1253.945.2000
`vrrwifirvps.org
August 25, 2009
City of Federal Way
David Lee
Department of Community Development
P O Box 9718
Federal Way WA 98063-9718
RE: NORPOINT HEIGHTS (08-100329-00-SU)
Dear Mr. Lee,
� •
� Federal Way
� �� � Public Schoois
a�c�iv�o s f
f,.��i? �!..`.�. �'r, Y j' �_i� � �� ��'+I ' � v � �r+�i i'-�.�! ^ � � �
, � � ~ i� �, L I�; j � �
%'.vL
� r,
;� , _
�-? s :��- : .
_ _..
�F-� �� � ; � �` � � . __ .
� �.: ' & .. �. +�` 3 .. .,,�„�w,� {:;.
' $ y .
� ' :
. _,..:_-.�' ;'-�..�,...._�._.
The Federal Way School District recently received infonnation on Norpoint Heights, a proposed 14-lot
single-family subdivision. The project is located at SW 352" and 27`" Ave SW.
Under current boundaries, this development is in the Sherwood Forest Elementary, Illahee Middle School
and Todd Beamer High School service areas. School service areas are reviewed each year and necessary
boundary changes may be made to accomrnodate enrollment increases. Students living in this area receive
school bus transpertation to Sherwood Forest Elementary, Illahee Middle School, and Todd Beamer High
Schooi. Bus stops are reviewed annually as student transportation needs change. The closest stop for
Sherwood Forest Elementary and Illahee Middle School is on 27'�' Ave SW at SW 351 St.. The closest stop
for Todd Beamer High School is on SW 349�' Pl at 2609 (Coronado Park).
Student safeiy must be considered for ail students who would walk to the schools and to school bus stops
from this development. Sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions far
students are factors the district must consider as we comment on development within our service azeas. We
ask the developer to prepare a"Schooi Access Analysis" to the elementary, middle school and high school
from this proposed development. Attached are guidelines for preparing this analysis.
The most rec;ent Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan indicates a student yield of .7194 from
new single-family housing. This development could add 10 to 11 new students. These aze averages only;
i}:e acEual nUinber uf students nay vary T'r�is may �:;,ate a r.eed for additior.al space, equipment :.nd sta��f.
This impact is mitigated by the collection of impact fees.
The District appreciates the opportunity to comment on this proposed development.
Sincerely,
l 1
�f i
T�nya Nascimento q
Enrollment Arialyst ZD � !�
� ���
cc: Sally McLean, Cluef Financial Officer
David Remman, Safety Officer
Cindy Wendland, Transportation Director
School Principais
Norpoint Heights.doe
� � � �- 4�. .
�
"' a � _., �. _ .t .r
��� � # �# � � k,,�
Departrnent of Development and Envir'+��n�inerf�a�'S�rvices
Building Services Division
900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest �:�`; . .; ° .��_. . -,. '.
Renton, Washington 98057-5212
206-296-6600 TTY 206-296
.. � ��
� ,, _ e y g� ` :�S ��: � .r'� �''°r�'� �� �'�`-�,.� ac. 1 �'�.�< ' �. ^z'2
s .�,��� ` ��a�v-��`� �'� `�`��" �� � � � � � ��... � `s �� �� ?-'�S-�F��€� a
� s _ �� � X �
� �"�" h- .d � ""� F ��-" ,� -'�+-,� �; „� }� '�o�t-�
��� �'��. ��� ���' � �4�'� � ; ��'� �'����
�r- ��. fr,�
a z . .�,�� � � ����, ^��.� ' � �� � � - ��s�����` � • I
��a�>>,�:��:,.�x:`�..�� ��'��:���'�-- �"�'�3 y�z .��:,��,
For alternate formats, call 206-29,6-6600.
This certificate provides the Public Health - Seattle & King County Department and the Department of
Development and Erivi�onmental Services with informa6on necessary to evaluate development proposals.
Do not write in this box
[j Building Permit �Preliminary Plat or PUD °��
❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Rezone or other:
ApplicanYs name:
Proposed use:
LOCatloll (attach map and Iegal descripBon if necessary):
�u �sa��3- �
Sewer ageney infiormation:
���Y���
rY
�y
�'
- 9oz6 ��
. a. Sewer servicecan be provided by side sewer connection oniy to an existing size sewer
feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to senre�the p�oposed use.
OR
to( -_._-_•.._3.
�ry b. Sewer service wili require an improvement to the sewer system of:
�(�) - �f+e/ -1' �' ,
�yj feet of sewer trunk or lateral to reach the site and� ��- -
J jlll i ; �
�(2) The construction of a collection system on the site; and/or "" ��
❑ (3) Other (describe): , ��� � � � �" �� � -�-. •
- � � ;:.
�_ �:�'r��;_�.:
2. � a. The sewer system improvement is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. �
OR , .�
❑ b. Tfie sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment
3. � a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district or has been granted Boundary Review Board :: �
approval for extension of service outside the district or city.
OR
❑ b• Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to provide service.
4. Service is subjeat to the following:
I
LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DiSTRICT
Agency name
��T�Cf( T[T
Title
sewer availability form.doc
��l�kiJ ��v�.`� .
ignatory name
_ �g
Signature � e � �, �:
!J/���� �
�
b-cert-sewer.pdf 02-07-2002
Page 1 of 1
�-
�
� ? �
-
Y � _
�
�:�
�.
.- •
F �
/
:
: _
I certify that the above sewer agency information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of
signature.
� t� ,� ;, ,' �, Web date: 04/26/2007 f
# i - .. 1
�..
(�11! l.'�1i`� � ; 3, �ri
g�+n#Y
Departrnent of Development and Environmental Service
BuildingServlces Division �:.� Y f'; ; �;�;T;�
900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest �� �; .;
Renton, Washington 98057-5212 b ~
206-296-6600 TfY 206-296-7217
For alternate formats, cali 206-296-6600.
This certificate provides the Public Health - Seattle & King Counry Department and the Department of
Development and Environmental Services with information necessary to evaluate development proposals} °
not write in this box
❑ Buiiding PeRnit �.Preliminary Piat or PUD ✓
❑ Short Subdivisioa ❑ Rezone or other:
AppticanYs name: r' r� y� _ j`
Proposed use: _ f f
LOCatiOn (attach map and �gal descripdon if necessary):
Iv'
. � �'� � *�, � `tie�+S � t
�'` ��`� .'�� Y �� `�� � °'� a a r � � ` � � ��
��,��€ '�-.�7z ��, r ���.� 4,.: �.�� f� S'� ' a � �. �'��'•s
���`��,���"'����`�� � . ,�` ���`��
-s
�h�� s ����� � � � ���
� .
✓
�
�
✓
._�__ � � -�;=
���
,. o
�
2. (�
❑
3. �
a. The water system is in conformance with a County. approved wate� comprehe�sive plan. ✓
OR -
b. The water system improvement is not in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan and will
require a water comprehensive plan amendment. (This may cause a delay in issuance of a permit or approval.)
a_ The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Boarcl approval
for extension of service outside the dishict or aty, or is within the Eounty approved service area of a private water '�
purveyor.
OR
❑ b.
4. � a_
OR
❑ b.
�
�
�
m
Mnexa6on or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to provide service.
Water is or will be available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the
nearest fire hydrant �_ j-�, (� ✓ feet from the building/property (or as maiiced on the attached ma
P)�
Rate ot flow at Peak Demand: ❑ less than 500 gpm (approx gpm) ❑ 50Qto � 1000 gpm or more ,/
❑ flow test of gpm ❑ calculabon of y p m
Duratlon: ❑ Iess than 1 hour ❑ 1 hour to 2 hours � 2 hours or more ✓ Other.
(Note: Commercial building permits which indude multifam�7y shuctures require flow t or ), .�.,_ =
Water system is not capable of providing fire flow. ������ #�•— '
5. +�c a. Water system has certificates o# water nghts or water right daims sufficienYto provi� ' � � ;�
OR
�.. t�
❑ b. Water system does not currently have necessary water rights or water right claims..
Comments/conditions: S"��f �Lc'a (�� z� f J � � �.��yt� � ��-• � ✓
- ,� ..� fz�
---- _ _ ---�------------ -
I certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification sha(I be valid for one year from date of signature.
LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT ��{y�-�,,� �C����,�
Agency name Signatory name
�(� l � , �c.�{ . �?'7?� j�� � � / /
T�tle _ {�.�.�---E � f ? � '�
ignature �� - ` Date f0�
✓. . - -
The District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delav or denv water service ha�a� ��.,.,.,
a. Wate� can be provided by service connection onty to an existing
feet from the site.
OR
b_ Water service vui�� require an improvem nt to the water system of:
�� �`�i"� `� hK ,/�feet of water main to reach the site; andtoF.
�j (2) i'he construc�ion of a d�stribu�on�stem on�he s�te; a� '� �
� �x. � 3 : �- o :� ; ;�. ---, �� � :.:'
�(3) Other (describe): ��_ � � • '
; •__ � c � c:��
(size) water main that is
�i ;--=-:_ `.�`� �,'�;_ ✓
iter availability form Rev. 05-19-2003 p anP � � �
COU1vCIL MEETING DATE: April 6, 2010
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
MEET[NG DATE March 15 , 2010
❑ Public Hearing
❑ ; Other
EPT: Public Works
SUB.TECT: South 356`� Street at SR 99 Intersection Improvements Project — Project Acceptance and Retainage Release
POLICY QUESTION Should the Council accept the South 356�' Street at SR 99 Intersection Improvements Project
constructed by Ceccanti, Inc. as complete?
COMMITTEE Land Use and Transportation Committee
CATEGORY:
� Consent
❑ City Council Business
❑ Ordinance
❑ ResoluNon
STAFF REPORT BY: Marwan Salloum P.E., Depury Public Works Director
Attachments: Memorandum to the Land Use and Transportation Committee dated March 15, 2010.
Options Considered:
l. Authorize final acceptance of the South 356�` Street at SR 99 Intersection Improvements Project
constructed by Ceccanti, Inc., in the amount of $2,651,936.55 as complete.
2. Do not authorize finat acceptance of the completed South 356�' Street at SR 99 Intersection Improvements
Project constructed by Ceccanti, Inc.. as complete and provide direction to staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends forwarding Option 1 to the April 6 201 City Council Consent
Agenda for approvai.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: �r �
Committee
COMM[TTEE RECOMMENDATION: Forward Option
Dini Duclos. Chair Ji�
DIRECTOR APPROV.
ITEM #:��.
couoci�
1 to the April 6, 2010 Council Consent Agenda for approval.
Member
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION "I � approval of �nal acceptance of the South 356` Street at SR 99
Intersection Improvements Project constructed by Ceccanti, Inc., in the amount of $2, 651, 936.55 as complete "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY ClTY CLERRS OFF/CE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVEB COUNC[L BILL #
� DENIED �� n�d�g
❑ TABLEDNEFERRED/N0 ACTION Euactmeat reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOIYD READING (ordinances only) OItDINANCE N
REVISED - 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION #
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 15, 2010
TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee
VIA: Brian Wilson, City Manager/Police Chief ���
FROM• Marwan Salloum, P.E., Deputy Public Works Director
' John Mulkey, P.E., Street Systems Project Engineer >�'"�'
SUBJECT• South 356` Street at SR 99 Intersection Improvements Project — Project Acceptance and Retainage
' Release
Prior to release of retainage on a Public Works construction project, the City Council must accept the work as
complete to meet State Department of Revenue and State Department of Labor and Industries requirements. The
above-referenced contract with Ceccanti, Inc. is complete. The finai construction contract amount is
$2,651,936.55. This is $244,256.86 below the $2,896,193.41 (including contingency) budget that was approved
by the City Council on February 17, 2009.
K:\LUTq2010\03-15-10 S356th Street @ SR 99 Intersection Improvement Project - Project Acceptance.doc
COUNC[L MEETING DATE: April 6, 2010
_ __- __ _.... _ _ ___- _ ... _ __ _ _.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
ITEM #:��„
SUB.TECT: Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase III (Dash Point Road to South 284�' Street) Improvement
Project — Project Acceptance
POLICY QUESTION Should the Council accept the Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase III (Dash Point
Road to South 284�' Street) Improvement Project constructed by SCI Infrastructure, LLC as complete?
COMMITTEE Land Use and Transportation Committee
CATEGORY:
� Consent
❑ City Council Business
❑ Ordinance
❑ Resolution
MEETING DATE March 15 , 2010
❑ Public Hearing
Other
STAFF REPORT BY: Marwan Sal(oum, P.E., Deputy Public Works Director�YSEPT: Public Works
Attachments: Memorandum to Land Use and Transportation Committee dated March 15th, 2010.
Options Considered:
1. Authorize final acceptance of the Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase III (Dash Point Road to
South 284`� Street) Improvement Project constructed by SC[ Infrastructure, LLC in the amount of
$15,153,162.28 as complete.
2. Do not authorize final acceptance of the completed Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase III
(Dash Point Road to South 284�' Street) [mprovement Project constructed by SCI [nfrastructure, LLC as
complete and provide direction to staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDAT[ON: Staff recommends Option 1.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ''� "'� `
Committee
DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
COMMII"fEE RECOMMENDATION Forward Option 1 to the Aprit 6, 2010 Council Consent Agenda for approval.
�
Dini Duclos. Chair Jim rrell, Member J ck v, mber
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION "I movC�to accept the Pacifcc Highway South H�v Lanes P�ase III (Dash
Point Road to South 284` Street) Improvement Project constructed by SCI Infrastructure, LLC in the amount of
$15,153,162.28 as complete. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFF/CE)
COUNCIL ACT[ON:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1� rading
� TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACT[ON Eoactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READ[lYG (ordinances only) ORD[NANCE #
REV[SED - 02/O6/2006 RESOLUTION #
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 15, 2010
TQ: Land Use and Transportation Committee
VIA: Brian Wilson, City Manager/Police Chief
FROM• Marwan Salloum, P.E., Deputy Public Works Directo
' Brian Roberts, P.E., Street Systems Project Engine ,�
SUBJECT• Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase III (Dash Point Road to South 284`� Street)
' Improvement Project — Project Acceptance
BACKGROUND:
Prior to release of retainage on a Public Works construction project, the City Council must accept the work as
complete to meet State Department of Revenue and State Department of Labor and Industries requirements. The
above-referenced contract with SCI Infrastructure, LLC is complete. The final construction contract amount is
$15,153,162.28. This is $1,421,647.72 below the $16,574,810.00 (including contingency) budget that was
approved by the City Council on Apri13, 2007.
ce: Project Fik
k:\lu[c\2010103-10 Pacific Highway South HOV Phase [t4 Project acceptance.doc
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 6, 2010 ITEM #:
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUS.TECT: Citywide Pedestrian Improvements Program
POLICY QUESTION Shou(d Council approve the installation of Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons at locations
identified by prioritization criteria?
COMMITTEE Land Use and Transportation Committee
CATEGORY:
� Consent
❑ City Council Business
❑ Ordinance
❑ ResoluNon
MEETING DATE March 15 , 2010
� Public Hearing
❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY� Jesse Hannahs, P E, Senior Traffic Engineer ���� DEPT: Public Works
At the December 15, 2009, Council meeting, the Council approved instaliarion of two Rectangulaz Rapid
Flashing Beacon (RRFB's) systems on S 324�' Street and authorized staff to create a program to utilize the
remaining budget from the SW 356�' Street & BPA Trail Crossing RRFB project to increase pedestrian safery at
locations within the city. Staff have formulated criteria to prioritize additional RRFB locations with the goals of
increasing pedestrian safety and mobility.
Attachment: Memorandum to Land Use and Transportation Committee dated March 15, 2010.
Options Considered:
1. Approve prioritization criteria and direct staff to move forward installing Pedestrian Crossing
Improvements based upon priority location list as funds and future grant programs permit.
2. Do not accept prioritization criteria and provide direction to staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staffrecommends forwarding Option 1 to the Apri16 2010 City CounCil Consent
Agenda for approval. � _
C[TY MANAGER APPROVAL: �'��
Committee
DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
��
Council
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION ""I mo e o authorize staf�" to move forward�dith "Citywide Pedestrian
Crossing Improvements" based upon the proposed prioritization criteria as funds and future grant programs
permit. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERRS OFFlCE)
COUNCiL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED
❑ DENIED
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
REVISED —02/06/2006
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
COUNCIL BILL
#
1� readiog
Eoactment reading
ORD[NANCE #
RESOLUT[ON #
COMMCT'fEE RECOMMENDATION Forward Option 1 to the April 6, 2010 City Council Consent Agenda for
approval. ^
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
C�/ /:�
March 15, 2010
Land Use and Transportation Committee
Brian Wilson, Interim City Manager/Police Chief
FROM: Jesse Hannahs, P.E., Senior Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: Citywide Pedestrian Improvements Program
BACKGROUND:
At the December 15, 2009, Couneil meeting, the Council authorized the installation of Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacons (RRFB's) on S 324�' Street at the existing pedestrian crossings near 17�' Avenue S and
Belmor Park. This approval also created a new "Citywide Pedestrian Improvements Project" and
authorized City staff to create a prioritization location list to install additional RRFB's utitizing this
project's funding.
Staff has identified and evaluated criteria to create a prioritization location list considering pedestrian
safety and mobility. Criteria and weight were given to determine existing and potential locations in
which pedestrian crossings are most likely to occur in addition to locations where RRFB's would be
needed to provide for pedestrian safety.
The intention of the Citywide Pedestrian Improvements Program is to provide safety for pedestrians.
Pedestrian collision history shows where past collisions have occuned and where a need for further safety
measures exists. As such, documented pedestrian collision history is a critical component of the
prioritization criteria and thus has been weighted on a scale double that of the other criteria.
9-Year Pedestrian
Point Collision History
Scale
Totai Fatal
0 - -
1 1 -
2 2 -
3 3 -
4 4 1
5 5 -
6 6+ 2+
Existing roadway, traffic and crosswalk locarion criteria were developed. Locations with greater crossing
distances and higher traffic volumes were scored higher as such conditions determine a higher need for
pedestrian safety features. Locations where the roadway cross-section is greater than 79 feet were not
considered for placement of mid-block pedestrian crossings. These locations consist exclusively of cross-
sections with HOV lanes. The pedestrian crossing distance at such locations is too great to conclude that
an RRFB system would provide for adequate pedestrian safety. Distance to the nearest mazked pedestrian
crosswalk determines if alternate pedestrian crossings are available in the vicinity and thus, the likelihood
that a new or improved crosswalk would generate more pedestrian traffic.
Roadwa 8� Tra�c Crosswalks
Point Roadway Distance to
Scale Crossing Average Daily Nearest (ft)
Width (ft) Traffic (ADT/Lane) Existing Marked
** Crosswalk
0 0- 24 0- 1499 0- 299
0.5 25 - 34 1500 - 2499 300 - 599
1 35 - 44 2500 - 3499 600 - 899
1.5 45 - 54 3500 - 4499 900 - 1199
2 55 - 64 4500 - 5499 1200 - 1499
2.5 65 - 74 5500 - 6499 1500 - 1799
3 75 - 79 6500+ 1800+
Criteria were established to determine locations in which pedestrians were likely to use a marked
crosswalk as well as locations which tend to be utilized by more wlnerable pedestrians. These criteria
included frontage to schoois or the presence of safe walking routes to schools. Safe walking routes are
designated by school districts for Elementary Schools and Middle Schoots. Feasible walking routes for
High Schools were also considered. Separation of land uses by a roadway was considered based upon
land uses which would tend to attract more pedestrians.
Point School Frontage or parks, Recreation & Libraries Roadway Separating
Scale Safe Waiking Routes Land Uses
0 - - -
0.5 Potential High School Private Indoor Recreational Facilities & Single Family
Walkin Route Private Outdoor < 25 acres Residentiai Onl
1 High School Frontage FW Open Space < 25 acres & Private Multi-Family
Outdoor Recreation > 25 acres Residential
1.5 Middle School Walking FW Open Space > 25 acres & State Single Family from
Route ParksJLands CommerciaUO�ce
2 Middle School Dumas Bay Center, Senior Center, KC CommerciaUOffice from
Fronta e A uatic Center & We erhaeuser Trails CommerciaUOffice
2 5 Designated Elementary FW Neighborhood Parks Multi-Family &om
School Safe Route CommerciaUOffice
Elementary School FW Community Parks, FW Designated
3 Trails, FW Community Center & KC City Center Area
Frontage Libraries
Existing Transit Ridership Data for Bus Stops in the immediate vicinity along with nearby bus stops were
considered as riders are likely to cross the roadway to get to/from a stop. King County Metro does not
collect data for Dial a Ride Transit (DART) stops thus daily ridership assumptions were made for these
stop locations. Cost feasibility was also considered based upon preliminary estimates for complete
location costs which include number of RRFB's needed, median island and curb ramp construction,
lighting needs, etc.
An additional 1.5 points were given to locations where desired countermeasures would address vehicular
safety issues. Countermeasures included restriping to provide two-way left turn lanes, designated bus
stops or right turn lanes and addition of c-curb to restrict vehicular movements which have already been
restricted via signage.
Based upon this criteria weighting system, a prioritized location tist has been created. Existing locations
with pedestrian crossing treatments were also analyzed to check the validity of the criteria, however
previously impiemented safety measures have reduced safety concerns as demonstrated in the eight year
pedestrian accident history. A total of i 2 criteria were evaluated for a total score of 40.5 points possible.
T'he following is a priority location iist of the highest ranking twenty five (25) existing, future and
potential locations with subsequent point totals. Over fifly pedestrian crosswalk locations were evaluated
including those with existing midblock crossings, locations where past pedestrian accidents have occurred
and locations where citizens have in the past expressed a desire for a mid-block pedestrian crosswalk.
Some potential locations were immediately dismissed as sight distance requirements were not adequately
met or the roadway cross section was too great to provide for desired pedestrian safety and thus forty six
(46) locations were rated. Existing locations with pedestrian crosswalk flashing beacon systems of
various designs are highlighted but are not proposed for further upgrades at this time.
Priority Proposed Reference Location T ��� Existing System
Number Instaliation Street Points
1 S 324 ST 17 AV S (225' East) 19.5 RRFB
2 S 324 ST Belmor Park � (West Leg) 19.0 RRFB
3 21 AV SW SW 338 ST (165' South) 18.5 Pushbutton
Activated Beacon
4 S 320 ST Library & 10 AV S Between 17.5
5 SW Campus DR 17 AV SW (175' East) 17.0 Pushbutton
Activated Beacon
5 S 317 ST 25 P� S (East Leg) 17.0
7 SW 320 ST 1O PL SW (200' East) 16.5
8 1 WY S 1 PL S (North Leg) 16.0 Pushbutton
Activated Beacon
8 Military RD S S 286 PL (South leg) 16.0
8 S 348 ST 6 AV S {120' East) 16.0
8 SW 320 ST 14 WY SW & 13 AV SW Beiween 16.0
12 SW 312 ST 14 AV SW (West leg) 15.5 �ushbutton
Activated Beacon
13 11 PL S S 322 PL (400' North) 15.0
13 SW 336 ST 26 PL SW (East Leg) 15.0
13 SW 312 ST 8 AV SW (West Leg) 15.0
16 S 304 ST 16 AV S (West Leg) 14.5
16 SW 330 ST West Campus Trail 14.5 Pushbutton
Activated Beacon
16 S 288 ST Camelot DR (200' East) 14.5
19 S 308 ST 14 AV S (West Leg) 14.0
19 S 312 ST Steel Lake Park 14.0
19 S Star Lake RD 25 DR S/Mark Twain (North Leg) 14.0
22 20 AV S S 320 ST (575' North) 13.0
22 SW 320 ST SW 323 ST (500' East) 13.0
22 1 WY S S 340 ST (North Leg) 13.0
25 Weyerh Suser WY S 344 ST (600' South) 12.5
25 1 AV S S 308 ST (South Leg) 12.5 Constant Beacon
25 SW 320 ST 18 AV SW (200' East) 12.5
It could be noted that the placement of a marked crosswalk at one location may subsequently lower the
scoring of other nearby locations.
Staffwill also continue to pursue other funding sources to procure pedestrian improvement instaltations
through existing and future grant funding programs.
Attachment: LUTC memo dated December 7, 2009.
cc: Project File
Day File
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 15, 2009
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
rrEM #- 8. e .
S[1B.iECr: Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons on S 324� Street (Betmor Park Pedestrian Improvements)
PO[.[CY QUF.S'r[Otv: Should Council approve the installation of Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beac�s oa S 324
Street at Beimor Park and l7'�' Avenue S?
CoMMITT�E: Land Use and Transportation Committee
CATEGORY:
❑ co�nt ❑ o,�a���
� C'�ty Co�acil Business ❑ R�olatio�
�
-.
�
Member Dini Duclos, Member
S'rA� R�roR'r BY: Rick Perez, P.E., City Traffic Engineer D�T= �ik W°rks
At the November 2, 2009, Committee rae�ting, the Committee requested scaff review the 6istay of the
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB's) instailed at BPA Trail and SW 356�' Street for applicabiiity to
address pedestrian crossing concerns on S 324'� Street at Belmor Park. _
Att9cltment: Memorandum to Land Use and Transpoctation�Committee dated December 7, 2009.
Options Coosidered:
1. Transfer the remaining fund batance from the BPA Trail at SW 356 Street project to a new "Citywide
Pedestrian Crossing Improve�nents" project, and instali Rectangulaz Rapid Flashing Beacons on S 324�'
Street at Belmor Park and at 17 Avenue S as weii as other locations identified by staff.
2. Do not ins�all Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons on S 324 Street and provide direction to staff.
STA� RECOMM�NDAT[ON: Staff recommends Option 1.
q J
CI'i'1' MANAGER APPROVAL: jJ• � jJ ��� DIRECTOR APPROV
Cammia«
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDAT[ON Committee recommends forwarding Option 1 to die December 15, 2009 City
Council Cons�nt Agenda €or approvai. /'1
Linda Koch�ar, Chair
PR(fPOSED COUN�. MOTiON "' I mq6e� trarufer the remaining fu�d balance from dee BPA Trail at SW
356`"' Street project to a new "Citywide `�destrian Crossing Improvements" project, and i�stalt Rectcmgutar
Rapid Fiashing Beacons on S 32�' Street at Belmor Parrk and at 17`"' Avenue S as well as other lo�cativns
identified by staff. "
(BELOW TO BECOMPLETED BYClTYCLERBS OFFlCE!
COUNpL ACFlONs �
❑ 4PPROVED
� DENIED
❑ TABLED/DEFERREDINO ACTIOIY
❑ MOYBD TO SECOND REAMNG {ordina�ces only)
xEV�sEO - ovobnoos
MEETING DATE: DeCember l, 2009
❑ P.w� s��
� OtLer
COiINClL �ILL
�
1 �adi�
Eautsnt resdi�
ORDIiYANCE 1t
xESO�.u�r�or x
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE: Decembe� 7, 2009
TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee
VIA: Brian Wilson, interim City Manager
FROM: Rick Perez, P.E_, City Traffic Engineer
5 ��._ Redangr�lai Rapid Fyaskiag Beacons on S 32�`"` Street
' (Belnior Park Pedestrian Improvemenls)
BACKGROUND•
At ifie November 2, 2009, Committee meeting, the Committee requested staff �eview the history of the
Rectangular Rapid Ftashing Beacons (RRFB's) instaped at BPA Trail and SW 356�' Street for
appticability to address pedestrian crossing concems on S 324'" SU�eet at Belmor Park.
The concerns at SW 356 Street at BPA Trai! began upon the comptetion of Madrona Park. Oa
October 7, 2008, City Council �roved the instailation of an RRFB at this location. [f this project were
successful, staffwould continue with implementing simitar instatlations, using the funding from the BPA
Trail crossing project.
The RRFB was installed on June 15, 2009. No pedestrian collisions have been ceported at tfie BPA Trai!
crossing, either before or since the installation of the RRFB's. Staff observations and citi�n reports
suggest greatly improved driver yielding behavior. StatFs concern that an increase in yielding to
pedestrians might increase rear-end cotlisions has not been reaiized. As such, scaff considers the RRFB
installation successfui in improving pedestrian comfort in crossing SW 356'� Street without adversely
affecting safety, and therefore r�ommends that RRFB's be considered for additional installations using
the remaining project funds_ As such, staff proposes to transfer the remaining fund baiance from tfie BPA
Trni! at SW 356'� Street Pedestrian Improvement to a new "Citywide Pedestrian Improvements" pcoject,
and evalnate and instatl RRFB's at the iocations originally identified as weli as other locations ide�tified
tivough a prioritization process yet to be completed.
Having previously evaluated tfte �edestrian safety issues on S 324 Street, staff proposes installation of
RRFB at two (ocatioc�s on S 324 Sireet: at the Be(mor Park access, and the marked crosswalk east of
17 Avenue S, the latter of which has been a continuing source of citizen concerns and a consistent record
of pedestrian collisions of about 1 every 2 or 3 years. Based on the history of the BPA Trail at SW 356
Stroet project, staff estimates each installation would cost approximately $30,000, atthough staff proposes
to use King County to procure and instal! the devices, which staff believes could reduce 6nat project
costs. As such, staff would not be returning to Council foc bid awards, as procurement costs would be
. less than a20,000 for each installation.
Att�chment:
1. L[JTC memo dated lune 20, 2005.
2. LUTC memo dated November 2, 20Q9
a: Projca Fik
Day Fle
Af�QG�meni� 1
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORAND�7M
�
DATE: lune 20, 2005 •
'�'p; L.and Use and Transportation Committee
VIA: David H. Moseley City Manager
FROM: Rick Perez, P.E_, City Tcatfic Eagineer
3UBdEC'f: Belmor Park Safely ln�p�oveneen[s
POL[CY OUESTION:
What improvemeMs sl�ould be constructed to improve pedestrian safety at Belmor Park?
BACKGROt1ND•
A pedestrian fataliiy occumed on January 2005 oa S 324�' Street at the entrance of Belmor Parlc. Beim� Paric
residents presented the City with a petition reguesting additional street lighting, replacement of the "handicaQ
warning" signs with crosswalk warnin� signs with flashing amber beacons, and a"pushbutton-activated uaffic
tight". [t is unclear if the latter is a proposal for a pedestrian signal or merely a pedestriau�-activated flasher_
Staff has responded with the reptacement of the handicap warning signs with tluoresceM yeilow green pedestria�i
warnings signs, and the instaliation (now underway) of a street tight at each side oE S 324' Street at die crosswatk_
We also coliected turning movement counLs (including pedestrian ccossings) at the endance to Belmor Parl: and
spesd data or� S 324'� Street Coilision history since i997 was also reviewed.
Staff neviewed severa! guidance documents for ameliorating pedestrian coilisio��s. Particularly usefui is the latest
guidance from Federal Highways Administration, which updates research oii pedestrian coiiisions and lists
pedestrian countenneasures in order of preference.
Staff wili atsu be meeting with management of die Canmons to review these alternatives and staff
recomendatio�s.
OrTtolvs
1. Pedesh
Refuge island
2_ Pedestrian
Signat
positives Negatives
__ _. _ _ _.
■ Reduces pedestrian crossing distance to 24 -• Costs S 10,000 — 18,000
feet at time in one direction oniy ■ Reduces eastbc�und direction on S 324�
� Geates two-way left-turn (ane between Street to one lane_
i l'� Avenue S and 23`� Avenue S, • Eastbound buses block single ta�+e at
improving driveway access to the Commons bus stops
& Belma Park �
■ [mproves pedestrian safety • [ncreases coiGsions for vehicles
• Costs S t SO,UW
Does not meet federai guidelines for
sipnal installation
[ncreases collisions for vehicles
Costs $250,000
1)oes not meet federa! gui�lines for
signal instaltatia�
Contrary to function as minor arterial
Disruptive to transit
.
_.._..._ _... -- _ .. _--- . _._.._..._...--
3. Traf�ic Signa! � [mproves pedestrian safety •
� Less vehicle collisions than pedestrian -
signal `
4. Raised • Reduces vehicle speeds •
Crosswalic ■ Improves percentage of vehicles yielding •
to pedestrians •
- cos� ss,000
�c:wn�2oa�a6-ZO-as e�+or P� s�y u�+►�e�r�.ao�
5. Oversize signs � Costs $500
• P�ovides perceptioa of improved safety
6. Mast Arm • Provides pe�ception of improved safety
mounted signs �
.. �-
7. Eiashing ■ Provides perception of improved safety
Yeliow
Beacons
_ .. ___ _
8. !n-pavement • Some studies sfiow a shoct-term safet�-
Flashers imp�vement .
Staff Recom�cadatioa:
• No proven benefit
- Costs 57000
� No proveo benefit
■ Cvsts S I 6,000
• No proven benefit
� Costs 522,000
• High maintenance cost
• Mo proven long-term be.nefit
Aatlwrize option t to provide a pedestrian refuge island and restripe S 3l4'� Street, coeverting t�e
eastbouod iaside lane to a iwo-way left-tura lane.
Committee Recommendatiou:
Forward option 1 to the Jely i9`� City Couocil Coasent Agenda.
APPROVAL OF COMMiTTEE REPORT:
Jack Dovey, Chair M�c6iael Park, M�mber Eric Faisoo, Member
s '
K:1�-��1�1� eelmor vark S�ety [r►�xo�is.doc
�-I� .2.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 2, 2009
TO: Land Use and Transportation Commiitee
VIA: Brian Wilson, Interim City Manager
FROM: Rick Perez, P.E., City Traffic Engineer �
SUBJEG"1': Belmor Park Safety L�prm�ements
BACKGROUND•
At the October 20, 2009, Councii requested staff review the history of safety issues on S 324 St�+eet in
the vicinity of Belmor Park's entrance in response to citiz�en concerns.
Attached is the June 20, 2005 memo, outiining the issue and alternatives considered. To summari�, one
fatal pedestrian coilision occurred in 2005, prompting Belmor Pazk residents to petition the Council to
instal! addiiional sU�et tighting, flashing amber beacons with updated warning signs, and a traffic signal
inciading pedestrian actuation. Staff reviewed collision history and vehicular and pedestrian votume data
in proposing the recommended actions, which included the installation of impt+oved street lighting,
replacement of handicapped warning signs with fluorescent yeflow green pedestrian warnin8 signs,
restriping S 324'� Street fram 17�' Avenue S to 23` Avenue S to replace the inside eastboaad lane with a
two-way left-turn lane, and the instailation of a pedestrian refuge islaad.
Council approv� the staff recommenda6on on Juty ! 9, 2005, and the improvemeats wec+e install� by the
end flf 2005. In addition, Police installed a speed reader board on S 324" Street eastbound approaching
the Belmor Park entranc�.
Cotlisia► history sinc� this instaltation has been reduced by 50'/0. Comparing the coltision history of the
segment of S 324'� Street between 17'� Avenue S and 23 Avenue S from three years prior to installat�n
{2UO2-2004) to three years following installation {2006-2008), the number of reported collisions dropped
finm eight to four.
Although no further action appears warranted at this time, both the Belmor Park and 17�' Aven� S
pedestrian crossings were noted as potentiat future locations for the iastaltati� of Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacons_ Staff witl provide an analysis of our piiot project at BPA Trail at SW 356"' Str+eet for
these devices in early ZO l0, once 2009 coilision data has been processed.
Att�hm�t
1. i.UTC memo dated June 20, 2005.
cr: Project Fik
Day Fik
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 6, 2010
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
ITEM #:_��
AGENDA BILL
SoB.tEC7': S 348`� Street at 1 Avenue S Intersection Improvement Project – Bid Award
Po[,tcY QUES'r[o1v: Should the Council award the S 348`� Street at 1�` Avenue S Intersection Improvements Project to the
(owest responsive, responsible bidder?
COMMITTEE Land Use and Transportation Committee
CATEGORY:
� Consent
■
■
Ordinance
❑ City Council Business
Resolution
STAFF REPORT BY: Marwan Salloum, P.E Public Works Deputy Director �
MEET[NG DATE March I5 , 2010
❑ Pubtic Hearing
❑ Ot6er
Ee'�': Public Worlcs
Attachments: Memorandum to the Land Use and Transportation Committee dated March 15, 20t0.
Options Considered:
__._....-----......---------.._._...._...__._..._._.__. _ . _..___ ____.._._.._____.._...----.......__._....._.__.....----__------....-----------------...----- — -
1. Award the S 348'� Street at 1� Avenue S Intersection Improvements Project to Construct Company, LLC., the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder in the amount of $1,866,107.16 and approve a 10% contingency of $186,610, for a
total of $2,052,717.16, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. Award of Schedule B(Lakehaven's
portion of the project) is contingent upon Lakehaven Utility District Board approva! to awazd Schedule B as bid.
2. Reject ali bids for the S 348`� Street at l Avenue S Intersection [mprovements Project and direct staffto rebid the
project and return to Committee for further action.
3. Do not award the S 348`� Street at 1 S ` Avenue S Intersection Improvements Project to the lowest responsive,
responsible bidder and provide direction to staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option 1.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: l� �
COMM[TTEE RECOMMENDAT[ON Forward Option 1 t
Dini Duclos. Chair Ji
DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
I� �.
April 6, 20t0 Council Consent Agenda for approval.
Member
Jack
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION "Award the�8"` Street at I Avenue S Intersection bl�pfovements Project to Construct
Comparry, LLC., the lowest responsive, resp sebde bidder in the amount of $1,866,107.16 and approve a 10'� contingency
of $186,610, for a total of $2,052,717.16, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. Award of Schedule B
(Lakehaven's portion of the project) is contingent upon Lakehaven Utility District Board approval to award Schedule B as
bid ,.
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY C1TY CLERKS OFF/CE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL B[LL #
❑ DENIED 1� readiag
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACi'ION Enactmeat readiag
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORD[NANCE #
REVISED — 02/06l2006 RESOLUTION #
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
March 15, 2410
Land Use and Transportation Committee
Brian Wilson, City Manager/Police Chief �
Marwan Saltoum, P.E., Deputy Public Works Director
John Mulkey, P.E., Street Systems Project Engineer 3(L
S 348` Street at 1�` Avenue S. Intersection Improvement Project — Bid Award
BACKGROUND
Seven (7) bids were received and opened on February 18, 2010, for the S 348�' Street at 1�` Avenue S. Intersection
Improvement Project. See attached Bid Tabulation Summary. The lowest responsive, responsible bidder is
Construct Company, LLC. with a total bid of $1,866,107.16. The low bid received was (36%) below the engineer
estimate.
Reference checks on Construct Company, LLC. by City staff indicates that the contractor has performed similar
work. As a result, City staff believes Construct Company, LLC. can successfully complete this project to the
City's satisfaction. Therefore, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Construct Company, LLC. in the
amount of 1,866,107.16.
PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES:
Planning and Design
ROW Acquisition
Construction Cost (Bid Amount)
10 % Construction Contingency
PSE (Cost for duct and vault relocation)
--.._...--------------_ -------..._._...-----........----------------
C onstruction Management
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
AVAILABLE FUNDING:
Grant Funding (Urban Vitality Grant)**
Utility Tax (2006 Budget)
REET (2004 Budget)
Fund transfer from Project 141 (SR 99 Phase III)
Mitigation
Interest
Lakehaven utility relocation
TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET
BALANCE
$ 450,000
175,000
1,866,107
186,610
50,000
436,100
$3,163,817
$ 1,498,582
432,000
79,000
1,800,000
285,725
66,551
69,057
$ 4,230,915
$1,067,098
•' The Ur6an Vitalily Grant is a 50'�o grant match of project construction cost with a maximum of $1,996,335 available fundirrg
ce: Project File
K:\lUfq201fl�03-15-10 S348th Street at lst Ave Intersection Improvements Project - Bid Award.doc
� a�a�taa z.•aa �a� �F a� FA44 g Ri42 zqs ryqs ea r��� R- � x�� H YQRH � dflvaRqB a H� ��$$�R� a$ $�
��AAp�3: $:w�» F d Cd A� ��BA »�»»» ��L: wA« Ax� »R w �3i: �G � Awd C�N:» � AA»LdwQ N w q� iG�Nwp9 AA :�
� $8$8$C$4$$$$8$8$$iRi$ 8$$$68�8.�$9$$�$QQ$a $$8$ 68.8888$$$8$$8$$ $ 8888$�88$$$R$8$$$Q$8$8$BRY.$$$8$$ A8$88R$8$8888� $8$$
����a�:��g�� �A�BW»p� @ ..�»�°tta�tt�iB�9� d�a» a��� $ Q �� �� $d�3 �a 9a«»�3 &13.�@��$��asagxaa$ d4� »tRA�:9A� � �
� �xatt� � » ��a : �� a s� � «ns��� ��a � �a �"� s ���aa w �tt �� a» a�tt�»�
444C4ee,eqae6qaqaC44L�64CCa3b0 O#eC�CA3qC6�6tl�6ff�0ltltlqtltltlM�$88$96��$$8$$a$$$HH8a8$69�a$$8$ g
������A�R9�@��9�A$�����i��$$$��tl �� A�4R��$��$ @� �R� „� &.�
1�a a:«»g��g�sa ax�: arigmx��g»�»«Q�a „ a�aod as»g� w »a»"»�»�Mxqtt:xia s:�ca w��-"-��gd� »»
» . ��«.»» °
��� sssas�saseee 8
�@.���'x»�3$34�$s sxna»a&&fl6���A�9x&»�96 »»�� � � ��� ���ett� R°$ Cs9»aR � �Ysg waxx�ai:
� � �� � » : �»� � » a �� � I�d����»�„9=�a;, » �»»�� »� � � ����� �¢
� eeses&�$aasasessss�sae§�xiasea�aeeas��aasee�ss eaeasaa eass e�eeaea�aar�asew aesasaeaaaa a�R aesa
.� �n$�:�:�Q�9���$ Q9..��R#=��������.�tkgit�8'3� E&��x��������9�@���i @��� � °a�35��?�� �R��:� �i��
��a»a�s»9�:.:d»�»�» «adaaHa� a d»s39 ;�s� sd.�: » a�» oa�i„�"r�»-�d rt»�^a»z�;,s"att:
; - „ » ,. � „
;��
8 a 8881 Sp 68 $ 88 8$�$88��$ 8 .fij� .asaapss�a�����aaaaaaaneasesssaseseas�as�s�ase�a�cv�s�aa+a$eaeeaaa�ava�aaa
� ���R:att�Y���@R
� S7l:Ct' � » �»F » A AY{A� « pA» »� .. �tt:.� � .¢.
88$$$$9$$ a $$88$$8886$8$8 8$$BB$$$$&88.$ &88$$.8�$$$$86$& 88$Q$88$$588$$$e.&$$8$$$Sa$$$$8$ 98$8$$$8
� � �x���x��d@
i�� » „ »„_«&;.»-»- ; a »„�� $l :.�» »- P»»» $» „ » »»
8 88 g $ g 8 �8$Bq8$BQ8$$888$$88$8.88.q$$Sq$5i89�$88$888$888.88$$$8$Q$$$8@888.8$$$$$$g88$8 6$B$
� � �xiiri�R:$����d@ @�$�»x�aMxa��
„ . » " »�» » ��»
aasassesssa assaaaa
a���$°I�R�»�������a
e
q�.���«.�����F"��OC
aesesae aaaasaaaaa�
����tt
ae�aaa;maaa^Ro�4a�i0.�R-Rax^*i,�a�:tiMv!lafR�=i{8���,si&YB:siY�eMP�88 $8$7 9R$n$$?89iE8 'A.1A.�Q,R,$88�8R', RnB�I""$ «��A
� � »ffiaa.�g s:asg»a »�sca_a�a d�»dx �»»_dadd tt�tege wan Ct3A3Yti4=C1«�F ii»g�� g��o�a»:�as"a°- �tcF" ;,�tt»xsa:af
H� 8 8 68 $� 68 R 8 R$88 8 8 8 R „888 8$8$ 88 3tS{8$98ASt9,q88qqqq8�88.8888888888888888.883S888n$5?R8�C8868.8.8$$$$�?���R.°q86 88$$8$$$888$St88$8$8
� �����.R�&.3t�i����g�aaa��:�»�Y�R��aa»:a8:��99�t3@��$$�6�a��@@�@��M»��9x��$:=tt��a�a��5���$�:a�ri�sa�� ������»��aY���a����
! 9 &»» » ' " »»atttt »� �x aa Rw aa � » a»�
,s aesaaeasaeassaesaessessasea�asassaseaseesesasflsssessseasssasasses$aesesaesaeas$easaase esssgsessasss��aesa
1 $ ������@ ? � R@ ��a�as�sisx�� ':a w��$a��s ce �$ w ��� . ����as�ar�i����� 8i ���x��aaaa�sz�� e "�x���s����sa'=���aa�a�- aana����������aaa��
�� » , »9»» .. �»»" & „„X� �� »�:=.. ,. » . x» ��: » »» 5:
�3 8 888$888888888.6$$888
: p ������»��c�i���a�s�ss$ A�B� g ���� �� � ����� � 98- ��a
a F Ni»�: - Ct �NF w Yt � ..» � �t�A"�RSt.7##�l���w�y� It »� � A'" M s �» 6 � : » � A BA M Ai���
&888 88888$88$$886888888$$ 88888$88$8888$8$8888@88$88.888888Q$$$$$$8$8�88$�868$8$$$&88888.$$8 88$$ 88888$a8.$$88$888$8Q
��8������� ��@�����tR�����������R ����i�3 ��� ���e�� ��$8�@���� a����� ��.A� �����9@?���qA����s�$ � �? ��� �.����6�#��
�< $_s""gxattai�� �sx��4s»saax aa» xx�» a ss ��»»aisa�aae a»�aaaad� _a�a�-^._• �art»�snx"»�- a�=ct�aa»�ac�attia»x�a
_a»�» R �& ���c �� » »8»"» » »-�,. tt„»»c�;:
�� » » .. »» » » »
§. � 8688$88888888$86$$8
���$�a�x�������a��asx» ��s »�Bea��aE»9 ��8� a��s��. �.�R@@��9�5 9��@�'��»� �x �� � � � � ���s�. ����
'� =`s "� tt i �»� „ ��s � �a � «aaa��r���»»N � Nx � � � »tt a M � �� ��� ��» ��»»x�
�
���� � �� �
=ttC
a3��'��$
$� �F��4 ��
B��
���
���
���
���
���
�
��R�`R
�a�� a
8����4
��
�n
z ��
g ��
��
�5
�
�
�I i
�T $
8
��
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 6, 2010
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
ITEM # : � �a. )
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: FEE ADJUSTMENTS FOR PICNIC AND SPECIAL EVENT RESERVATIONS
POLICY QUESTION Should the Council authorize a fee adjustment for picnic and special event reservations?
COMMITTEE PRHSPS
CATEGORY:
❑ Consent
� City Council Business
MEETING DATE Feb 9 , 2010
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
❑ Ordinance
❑ Resolution
STAFF REPORT BY: Stephen Ikerd Parks & Facilities Mana _er DEPT• PRCS
_ ................................................................................................_...........� _ .........._�....._........................................................................._..............._......._g . _ ---_....�..........__....................._._............_._................. �_._......_..._.__.._..---------__....._._._...................._�_
On Feb 16, 2010 staff ineet with Council and presented options to increase Picnic Reservation and Special Event
rates. Staff received direction from Council to not increase rates for residents, but to bring back recommendations
for a non-resident rate and also explore an off season rate. The attached spreadsheets shows a proposed 50%
increase for non residents that would apply year round and an optional 25% discount in rates for an off season
resident rate Nov - Apr. The proposed 50% fee increase for non—residents is still within the average reservation
rates of neighboring cities, based upon a survey staff performed September of 2009.
Attachments: Proposed rate change documents (2)
Options Considered:
1 Authorize the proposed Picnic and Special Event reservation fee adjustment which ir�cludes; maintaining the
current rates for residents from May through October, creating a new off season discounted rate of 25% for
residents Nov - Apr and a 50% non resident increase, that would apply year round.
2. Do not authorize the proposed 2010 fee adjustment and provide direction to staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 ; to maintain the current reservation Picnic and Special Event rates for
residents May - Oct and create a new 25% discounted off season rate for residents Nov-Apr and increase the
current rate rates for n by 50°/a , which would be applied year round.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: yJ'/Y/�. DIRECTOR APPROVAL: �
��
Committee �cil o Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION "I move approval of maintaining the current Picnic and Special Event
reservation rates for residents May —Oct and create a new 25% discounted off.season rate for residents Nov-
Apr and increase the current rates for non-residents by SO% which would be applied year round. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1 reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION EnaMment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION #
CITY OP
� Federal Way
Parks, Recreation 8� Cultural Services
2010 Picnic Reservation Rates:
Call 253-835-6964
Lake Park
er � lake)
Steel Lake Park
Site ITables IBBQILimit
#1 I 12 I 2 1 120
#z i$ I 2 1 so
Steel Lake Park #3 8 2 80
Steel Lake Park #4 8 1 80
Steel Lake Park (with #5 12 1 120
small ballfield)
Proaosed rate chanqes underlined
25% discount 50% increase 50% increase
Off Season
Group Current Resident Current Resident Non-Resident Non- Resident
size May - Oct extra hrly rate Resident rate y@ar round extra hrly rate
Nov - Apr
�-80 $60 $15 45 90 22
81-120 $90 $25 68 135 27
�-so $60 $15 45 90 20
�-so $60 $15 45 90 20
�- so $60 $15 45 90 20
�-so $60 $15 45 90 22
s�-�ZO $90 $25 68 135 27
N otes :
Reservations are from 10:00 AM - 4:00 PM - Additional hours charged after 4:OOPM
Groups over 120 require a Special Events Permit and subject to a different fee schedule and requirements.
Electricity at site #1 only
Water available at the beach facility and bathrooms.
CITY OF
,� Federal �V1ray
Parks, Recreation 8� Cultural Services
2010 Special Event Rates:
Call 253-835-6964
*Fees are based on 4 hour increments
Group Size
50 or less
51 -150
151 - 250
250 - 500
soo+
Current rate*
May - Oct
$50.00
$100.00
$150.00
NA
NA
Proposed rate chan_qes underlined
25% discount 50% increase
Off season Non - Resident
Resident rate rate year round
Nov - A r
38.00 75.00
75.00 150.00
113.00 225.00
NA NA
NA NA
Additional current charges:
City supplied tables - $10.00 each
Additional trash cans - $5.00 each
Electricity -$20.00 for 4 hours or $50.00 for all day ( 10 hr max)
Notes:
Current Damage Deposit - refundable if no damage to site
Group size Deposit amount
1 - 250 $100.00
251 - 500 $200.00
501 - 800 $300.00
801 -1000 $400.00
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: Apri16, 2010
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
ITEM #: :GL -
SiTB.�c'r: Lakehaven Utility District Franchise Ordinance
POLICY QUEST'ION Should the City grant Lakehaven Utility District a Franchise to operate and maintain a water
and sewer system within the City of Federal Way?
CONIMTTTEE Finance, Economic Development and Regional
Affairs Committee
CATEGORY:
❑ Consent
❑ City Council Business
� Ordinance
❑ Resolution
MEETING DATE March 23, 2010
❑ Public Hearing
❑ (� Other
STAFF REPORT BY Marwan Salloum, P.E., Deputy Public Works Director�,��DEP1': Public Works
Attachments: Memorandum to the Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee dated
March 23, 2010.
Options Considered:
1. Approve the Ordinance and forward to the Apri16, 2010 City Council meeting for first reading.
2. Modify the Ordinance and forward to the Apri16, 2010 City Council meeting for first reading.
3. Reject the Ordinance and provide direction to staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends forwarding Option 1 to the Apri16, 2010 Council Agenda for
first reading. _ \ /
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL;��J�I�' (,�, �+, 3/ �DIRECTOR APPROVAL: ������
Committee Council omm�ttee Council
COMMTTTEE RECOMMENDATION Committee recommends forwarding Option 1 to the April 6 2010 Council
Consent Agenda for first reading.
r
eanne
Jack
PROPOSED COl7NCIL MOTION: � v v
1 READING OF ORDINANCE (04/06/2010) "I move to forrvard the ordinance to a second reading for
enactment on the Apri120, 2010 Council Consent agenda. "
2 1HD READING OF ORDINANCE (04/20/2010) "I move approval of the Lakehaven Utility Disirict Franchise
ordinance. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERXS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED I reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment resding
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances on[y) ORDINANCE # •
REVISED - 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION #
�
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 23, 2010
TO: Finance, Economic Development, and Regional Affairs Committee
VIA: Brian Wilson, City Manager/Police Chief
FROM: Marwan Salloum, P.E., Deputy Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Lakehaven Utility District Franchise Ordinance
BACKGROUND
Lakehaven Utility District and the City of Federal Way have determined that it is in the best interests of
the public and both parties that Lakehaven Utility District be granted a franchise from the City of
Federal Way, in order to specify the rights and duties of Lakehaven to install, operate and maintain a
water and sewer system including all related appurtenances located within the City of Federal Way
rights-of-way. See attached copy of the proposed franchise ordinance.
The term of this Franchise is for a period of five (5) years commencing on the effective date of this
Franchise.
The proposed Franchise ordinance also addresses the fire hydrant cost issue. Lakehaven Utility District
will be responsible to operate and maintain all portions of the water system, including the fire hydrants
and those components of the water system that provide fire suppression benefits within City boundaries.
Lakehaven will, during the term of this Franchise, indemnify and hold the City harmless from any costs
associated with the maintenance of the water system, including the cost of maintaining the fire hydrants
and those portions of the system that provide fire suppression benefits within City boundaries. In
consideration for Lakehaven solely bearing responsibility for maintenance of the fire hydrant and those
portions of the water system that provide fire suppression benefits within City boundaries, the City
agrees to forego the following action during the term of the Franchise:
The levying of any utility tax on revenues of the water and sewer systems; and
Initiation of any proceedings under RCW Chapter 35.13A to assume the water and/or sewer
service jurisdiction of Lakehaven.
K:�FHSRAC (FEDRAC)�2010\03-23-10 Lakehaven Utility District Franchise .doc
ORDINANCE NO. 10-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL
WAY, WASHINGTON, GRANTING LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT, A
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, A NONEXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO
OCCUPY THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, THROUGH THE FRANCHISE AREA FOR THE
PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTING, MAINTAINING, REPAIRING,
RENEWING AND OPERATING A WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM WITHIN
AND THROUGH THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND ADDRESSING
HYDRANT COSTS W�TI-IIN CITY BOUNDARIES.
WHEREAS, Lakehaven Utility District and the City of Federal Way have determined that it
is in the best interests of the public and both parties that Lakehaven Utility District be granted a
franchise from the City of Federal Way, in order to specify the rights and duties of Lakehaven to
install, operate and maintain a water and sewer system including all related appurtenances located in
certain rights-of-way as depicted in Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.47.040 permits the City of Federal Way to grant nonexclusive
franchises for the use of public streets, bridges or other public ways for, inter alia, poles, conduits,
tunnels, towers and structures, pipes and wires and appurtenances thereof for water, sewer, and other
private and publicly owned and operated facilities for public service; and
WHEREAS, in granting such a nonexclusive franchise, the City of Federal Way reserves
such other powers and authorities granted to Washington code cities by general law;
WHEREAS, the parties acknowledge the Washington State Supreme Court's ruling in Lane
v. Seattle that the cost of hydrants is a general governmentresponsibility; and
Ordinance No ] 0- Page 1 of 26
Rev 1/10
WHEREAS, Franchisee recognizes a benefit to its rate payers in not having its jurisdiction
assumed by the City or having the City impose a utility tax on Franchisee, and
WHEREAS, Franchisee is willing to accept the burden of any hydrant costs the City may be
liable for in exchange for the City waiving its rights during the period of the Franchise to: (1)
undertake an assumption of Franchisee's sewer and water service jurisdiction and (2} levy a utility
tax on Franchisee, and
WHEREAS, the parties believe that it would be in their mutual best interest to study and
evaluate ways in which they may work more cooperatively, including whether merger of their
operations would be beneficial.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Definitions
Where used in this Franchise the following terms shall be defined as follows:
1.1 "City" means the City of Federal Way, Washington, a municipal corporation of the
State of Washington, and its respective successors and assigns.
1.2 "Council" means the City of Federal Way Council acting in its official capacity.
I.3 "Director" means the Public Works Director, or designee, of the City of Federal Way
Public Works Department.
1.4 "Facilities" means all structures, antennas, equipment, pipes, mains, hydrants, valves,
meters, service lines in right of way, manholes, clean outs, and all other related appurtenances
Ordinance No 70- Page 2 of 26
Rev 1/10
owned or used by Franchisee and necessary for the distribution of water and collection of
wastewater.
1.5 "FWRC" means the Federal Way Revised Code.
1.6 "Franchise Area" means rights-of-way for public roads, streets, avenues, alieys, and
highways of the City as set forth in Exhibit A. Exhibit A may be updated by the City upon the City's
acquisition or vacation of rights of way and upon any annexation of area that is within the
Franchisee's service area.
1.7 "Franchisee" means Lakehaven Utility District, a municipal corporation, and public
utility, and its respective successors and assigns.
Section 2. Grant/Acceptance
2. l Grant of Franchise. The City does hereby grant to Franchisee, subject to the terms of
this Franchise, the right, privilege, authority and franchise to:
(a) Lay, construct, extend, repair, renew, and replace Facilities in the Franchise
Area; and
(b) To charge and collect tolls, rates and compensation for such utility service and
such uses.
2.2 Acceptance by Franchisee. Franchisee shall have no rights under this Franchise, nor
shall Franchisee be bound by the terms and conditions of this Franchise, unless Franchisee shall,
within sixty (60) days after the effective date of this Franchise, file with the City its written
aceeptance of this Franchise and all of its terms and conditions.
Ordinance No 10- Page 3 of 26
Rev 1/10
Section 3. Conditions of Use
3.1 Non-Franchise Area Citv Propertv. This Franchise does not and shall not convey any
right to Franchisee to install its Facilities on, under, over, across, or to otherwise use City-owned or
leased properties of any kind outside the Franchise Area, or to instali Facilities on, under, over,
across or otherwise use any City owned or leased property within the Franchise Area other than
public roads, streets, avenues, alleys, and highways of the City. The Franchisee shall place Facilities
within the Franchise Area, but not on any other pubiic property owned, in whole or in part, leased, or
otherwise occupied by the City unless an easement is granted.
3.2 Termination of Easements. Franchisee agrees that it shali be responsible to abandon
its easements in property that is to become right of way under City projects pursuant to, and in
accordance with, the September 2009 agreement between the parties, the terms of which are hereby
incorporated by reference.
3.3 Operation costs. To the e�rtent permitted by law and as otherwise expressed in this
agreement, Franchisee shall be solely responsible for the operation, maintenance, repair and
construction of its Facilities.
3.4 Facilities Abandonment. Franchisee will notify the City when a Facility has been
deemed obsolete and its use discontinued. The Facility sha11 be removed by Franchisee, at is
expense, within one hundred (180) days of the date the Facility's use is discontinued. The City may
deem a Franchisee's facility obsolete if the Facility ceases to be operational for more than ninety (90)
days and the Franchisee has not initiated repair or removal. If Franchisee fails to begin repair or
remove the Facility, the City or its agent may cause the Facility to be removed pursuant to Section l4
Ordinance No 10- Page 4 of 26
Rev 1/10
of the Franchise. However, with the express written consent of the City, Franchisee may leave such
Facilities in place. The City's consent shall not relieve Franchisee of the obligation and/or costs to
subsequently remove or relocate such Faciiities at the City's request, in which case Franchisee sha11
perform such wark at no cost to the City in accordance with Section 14. The provisions of this
Section shall survive the expiration, revocation or termination of this Franchise.
Section 4. Term.
4.1 Initial Term. Subject to Franchisee filing its acceptance pursuant to Subsection 2.2,
the term of this Franchise sha11 be for a period of five (5) years commencing on the effective date of
this Franchise, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the terms of this Franchise or other applicable
law. This Franchise may be extended by mutual written agreement of the parties
Section 5. Hvdrant costs.
The parties agree that during the term of the Franchise, Lakehaven shall be responsible to
operate and maintain all portions of the water system, including the fire hydrants and those
components of the water system that provide fire suppression benefits within City boundaries.
Lakehaven shall, during the term of this Franchise, indemnify and hold the City harmless from
any costs associated with the maintenance of the water system, including the cost of maintaining
the fire hydrants and those portions of the system that provide fire suppression benefits within
City boundaries. As consideration for Lakehaven solely bearing responsibility for maintenance
of the fire hydrant and those portions of the water system that provide fire suppression benefits
within City boundaries, the City agrees to forego, during the term of the Franchise; (1) the
levying of any utility tax on revenues of the water and sewer systems and the (2) initiation of any
Ordinance No 10- Page 5 of 26
Rev 1/10
proceedings under RCW Chapter 35.13A to assume the water and/or sewer service jurisdiction of
Lakehaven. In the event that it is determined in a court of competent jurisdiction that the terms
and provisions herein do not legally transfer the City's obligation to bear the cost of maintenance
of the hydrants, or other portions of the system that provide fire suppression benefits within City
boundaries, the parties agree to meet to discuss the amendment of this Agreement to retain the
essential purposes of this section. If no agreement can be reached, this section may be stricken
from the Agreement.
Section 6. Location of Facilities
6.1 Location. The location of existing Facilities, their depths below the surface of ground
or grade of a right-of-way (if available), shall be submitted to the City in the form of a map showing
the approximate location of Franchisee's existing water and sewer systems within the Franchise
Area. Upon written request of the City, Franchisee shall update such map to reflect actual or
anticipated improvements to the Franchisee's water and sewer systems within the Franchise Area.
Any such map (or update thereo� so submitted shall be for City informational purposes oniy and
shall not obligate Franchisee to undertake any specific improvements, nor shall such map be
construed as a proposal to undertake any specific improvements.
6.2 GIS Data. The Franchisee shall provide, at such time as Franchisee develops and
employs Geographic Information System ("GIS") technology for its water and sewer system maps
and records throughout its service area, information required in section 6.1 in digital GIS format for
its Facilities within the Franchise Area.
Ordinance No 10- Page 6 of 26
Rev 1/10
6.3 Desi�n Markin�s. In the event the City desires to design new streets or intersections,
renovate existing streets, or make any other public improvements, Franchisee shall at the City's
reasonable request, provide the location of Franchisee's underground Facilities within the Franchise
Area by either field markings or by locating tl�e Facilities on the City' s design drawings, and shall
provide all other reasonable cooperation and assistance to the City.
6.4 No Warrantv or Waiver. Nothing herein is intended to expand, or relieve the parties
of, their respective obligations arising under Chapter 19.122 RCW or other applicable law with
respect to determining the location of utility facilities prior to construction. Further, neither the
provisions of this Franchise nor the absence of any specific provision in this Franchise is intended to
limit, detract from or render ineffective any disclaimer (including, without limitation, any disclaimer
as to accuracy or completeness) placed by Franchisee on any map furnished to the City pursuant to
Section 6.1 and 6.2 of this Franchise.
Section 7. Noninterference of Facilities
Franchisee agrees to maintain its Facilities and perform all work within the Franchise Area:
(1) so as not to unreasonably interfere with the free passage of traffic, (2) in accordance with the laws
of the State of Washington and City ordinances, regulations, resolutions and rules, and (3) as
required by the Director.
Section 8. Requirement to Obtain Permits
8.1 Permits Franchisee shall, at its expense, obtain a11 permits (including rights-of-way
permits) and pay all fees required by applicable City ordinances, regulations, resolutions and rules
prior to commencing any work within the Franchise Area, excluding blanket permits for water and
Ordinance No 10- Page 7 of 26
Rev 1/10
sewer routine maintenance work. Permit applications shall: (1) show the position and location of the
Facilities to be constructed, laid, installed, or erected at that time; (2) show their relative position to
existing rights-of-way or property lines upon prints drawn to scale, unless otherwise approved by the
Director; (3) designate rights-of-way by their names and; (4} show improvements as required by the
Director, such as, but not limited to, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, shoulders of roadway, ditches, paved
roadways, roadways to property lines, turnouts, parking strips, telephone or electric distribution
poles, and pipes existing on the ground to he occupied. The Franchisee shali specify the class and
type of materials ta be used, equipment to be used, and mode of safeguarding and facilitating the
public traffic during construction. The manner of excavation, construction, installation, backfill,
and temporary structures such as, but not Iimited to, traffic turnouts and road obstructions shall meet
the standards of the FWRC and be satisfactory to the Director. All traffic control shall be in
accordance with the right-of-way permit, and shall be in accordance with the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The Franchisee shall indicate on the right-of-way use permit
application the time needed to complete the work. The time needed to complete the work is subject
to approval by the City as a condition of the issuance of the right-of-way permit.
8.2 Exception to Permit Requirement. In the event of an emergency in which
Franchisee's Facilities within the Franchise Area are in a condition as to immediately endanger the
safety or health of life, property or the environment, Franchisee may take action immediately to
correct the dangerous condition without first obtaining any required permit so long as(1) Franchise
informs the City of the nature and extent of the emergency and the work to be performed prior to or
Ordinance No 10- Page 8 0, j26
Rev 1/10
at the commencement of the work, if reasonably possible, or immediately following cessation of the
emergency; and (2) such permit is obtained by Franchisee as soon as practicable thereafter.
8.3 Routine 1Vlaintenance. Franchisee sha11 have the right to conduct routine maintenance
to repair, modify, suppiement, replace or upgrade the Franchisee's Facilities, provided that the
Franchisee sha11 obtain any necessary Right-of-Way Use Permit and any other permits or
authorizations required by all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules and regulations prior to
the performance of any said routine maintenance. The following non-emergency related activities
such as water main flushing, valve exercising, sanitary sewer line cleaning/inspection, and other
activities as approved shaIl be allowed to occur under an annual maintenance blanket permit.
8.4 Notice of Entrv. At least forty-eight (48) hours prior to entering right-of-way adjacent
to private property to perform the installation, maintenance, repair, reconstruction, or removal of
facilities, exeept those emergency activities exempted from permit requirements, a written notice
describing the nature and location of the work to be performed shall be communicated to the private
property occupant to be impacted by Franchisee's work. Examples of acceptable notice include but
are not limited to a pre-printed door hanger, mailed letter, and/or sandwich boards.
Section 9. Standard of Performance
The Franchisee sha11 not excavate for a distance of more than one hundred feet (100') without
immediately backfilling and compacting to surface grade and permit requirements. Backfilled trench
areas within a driving lane must be patched, either temporarily or permanently, or plated, before the
end of the workday in which they have been opened. Trench areas within the rigl�t-of-way, but not
within a driving lane, must also be plated, patched backfilled, and/or patched within the time limits
Ordinance No 10- Page 9 of 26
Rev 1/10
specified by the City on tYie right-of-way use permit. Fina1 surface restoration shall be completed
within thirty (30) days and shall be equal to or better than the surface condition prior ta permit
issuance.
Any asphalt overlay completed within the Franchise Area during a five (5) year period
immediately prior to the date of permit application shall not be open cut by Franchisee unless
required by an emergency or as approved by the Director. In the event of this emergency cut in new
pavement, Franchisee shall install new asphalt overlay on the street that is open cut, for a minimum
of 250 feet in both directions from the open cut, or pay a mitigation fee, or as determined otherwise
by the Director.
Franchisee shall, in carrying out any authorized activities within the Franchise Area, comply
with ali applicable laws, ordinances, codes and standards, as now existing or hereafter adopted or
amended, and shall comply with the terms of this Franchise, whether or not the work is performed by
the Franchisee, its agents, employees, subcontractors, or other third parties at Franchisee's direction.
Upon completion of any insta.11ation of Franchisee's Faciiities within the Franchise Area, Franchisee
shall submit to the Director plans, stamped by a Professional Engineer licensed by the State of
Washington (if required in the permit), showing the "as-built" location of the Facilities. Nothing
herein is intended to relieve the parties of their respective obligations arising under applicable law
with respect to determining the Iocation of utility facilities.
Ordinance No 10- Page 10 of 26
Rev 1/10
Section 10. Survev Markers and Monuments
Franchisee shall, using a Iicensed surveyQr, immediately replace all markers or monuments
disturbed during any work by Franchisee within the Franchise Area. Franchisee shall pay all costs
associated with such lost, destroyed or disturbed monuments or mazkers.
Section 11. Surface Markings/Stakes
Prior to Franchisee cammencing any excavation work within the Franchise Area that disturbs
any monument or marker, Franchisee shall, using a licensed surveyor, reference all monuments and
markers relating to subdivisions, plats, highway, and other surveys. The reference points shall be
located so that they shall not be disturbed during the Franchisee' s operations under this Franchise.
The method referencing these monuments or other points shall be approved by the City before
placement. The construction shall be made as expeditiously as conditions permit, and as directed by
the City. The cost of monurnents or other markers lost, destroyed, or disturbed, and the expense of
replacement of the monuments, shall be borne solely by the Franchisee. A complete set of reference
notes for monuments, markers, and other ties shall be filed with the City. In the event of any conflict
or inconsistency between this Section 10 and Chapter 19.122 RCW, as now existing or hereafter
amended, Chapter 19.122 RCW will control.
Section 12. Notification to Fire District
If it is necessary to shut down or diminish the water pressure so that fire hydrants may be
affected, the Franchisee shall notify the appropriate fire district by telephone followed by faxed
transmittal or written notification, that water pressure or fire flow conditions have been affected. In
case of a planned shutdown or diminished water flow, at least forty-eight (48) hour prior notification
Ordinance No 10- Page 11 of 26
Rev 1/10
to the fire district is required. If mare than one fire hydrant is affected, Franchisee must provide a
map of the affected area to the fire district.
Section 13. Ri�ht to Citv of Undertake Maintenance Work
The laying, construction, maintenance, and operation of Franchisee' s system of water and
sewer pipes, and appurtenances granted under this Franchise shall not preclude the City, its
accredited agents or its contractors from doing necessary maintenance work contiguous to the
Facilities, provided that the Franchisee shall have sufficient notice of blasting, regrading, or
excavating in order that Franchisee may protect its lines or pipe or property.
Section 14. Right to Citv to Comt�lete Work
In the event Franchisee fails to comply with any applicable federal, state or City laws,
ordinances, rules, regulations or standards or with any of the terms of this Franchise, and such
noncompliance continues for a period of fourteen (14} days after Franchisee receives written notice
from the City regarding the noncompliance, the City may, but in no event is the City obligated to,
order any work completed, including without limitation Franchisee's obligation to repair pursuant to
Section 13 herein and Franchisee's obligation to remove facilities pursuant to Section 15 herein. If
the City causes such work to be done by its own employees or by any person or entity other than
Franchisee, the City will notify the state Department of Health or Department of Ecology, as
appropriate, prior to such work. The Franchisee shall, upon the City's written request, immediately
reimburse the City for all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City in having such work
performed, which costs may include the City's reasonable overhead expenses and attorneys fees.
Ordinance No 10- Page 12 of 26
Rev i/10
Section 15. Notice to Franchisee of Work bv Citv
15.1 City Reservation of Rights. The City reserves the right to use, occupy and enjoy the
Franchise Area for any purpose that is not inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this
Franchise. The Rights reserved herein include, without limitation, the construction of any City
owned electrical, water, sewer or storm drainage Iine, installation of traffic signals, street lights,
trees, landscaping, bicycle paths and lanes, equestrian trails, sidewalks, other pedestrian amenities,
and other public street improvement projects. This Franchise is not an exclusive franchise. Without
Iimiting Franchisee's rights under this Franchise, this Franchise shall not in any manner prohibit the
City from granting other and further franchises in, under, over, upon and along the Franchise Area.
15.2 City's Duties. In the event the City undertakes any work, including necessary
maintenance within a right-of-way in which Franchisee's Facilities are located, and such work
necessitates the relocation of Franchisee's then existing Facilities within the Franchise Area, the City
shall:
(a) Provide written notice to Franchisee requesting such relocation within a
reasonable time prior to the commencement of such City work; and
(b) Provide Franchisee with copies of pertinent portions of the City's plans and
specifications for such City work so that Franchisee may relocate its Facilities to
accommodate such City work.
(c) Coordinate to minimize conflicts between existing Facilities and Franchise
Area improvements where possible.
Ordinance No 10- Page 13 of 26
Rev 1/10
15.3 Franchisee's Duties. After receipt of the City notice requesting the relocation of the
Facilities pursuant to Subsection 152 (a) and receipt of the plans and specifications pursuant to
Subsection 15.2(b), Franchisee shall, within such reasonable time as approved by the Director, raise,
lower, or move such Facilities within the Franchise Area at its sole cost and expense so as to
conform to such new grades as may be established, and place the pipe in a location or position
causing the least interference with the improvement, repair, or alteration contemplated by the City.
15.4 Exclusivitv. This Section 15 shall govern all relocations of Franchisee's Facilities
required in accordance with this Franchise. Nothing in this Section 15 shall require Franchisee to
bear any cost or expense in connection with the location or relocation of any Facilities existing under
benefit of easement on property owned by a person or entity other than the City.
Section l6. Damage Renair
In case of damage by the Franchisee or by the Facilities of the Franchisee to rights-of-way, or
to public and private improvements to rights-of-way, the Franchisee agrees to repair the damage at its
own cost and expense. The Franchisee shall, upon discovery of such damage, immediately notify the
City. The City will inspect the damage, and set a time limit for completion of the repair. If the City
discovers damage caused by the Franchisee to rights-of-way, or to public and private improvements
to rights-of-way, the City shall give the Franchisee notice of tl�e damage and set a time limit so the
Franchisee may repair the damage. In the event the Franchisee does not repair a right-of-way or an
improvement to a right-of-way as required in this section, the City may repair the damage pursuant to
Section 14 of this Agreement
Ordinance No 1 D- Page 14 of 26
Rev l/10
Section 17. General Maintenance of Facilities
Franchisee will maintain Facilities located within the Franchisee Area in good operating
condition and repair in a manner consistent with applicable law and prudent utility practice, and will
comply with the following procedures:
(a) Franchisee will provide the City, on an annual basis upon the City's written
request, a proposed schedule of its routine Facility replacement or repair activities within the
Franchisee Area.
(b) Franchisee will meet, at least annually upon the City's written request, with a
City representative to discuss the City's concerns regarding the timing, scope, nature or
method of such repair or replacement activities within the Franchisee Area.
Section 18. Emer�encv Operations
Prior to the beginning of each winter storm season, Franchisee will, at the request of the City,
attend an annual coordination meeting with the City to discuss Franchisee's Emergency Response
Plan. At the request of the City, a copy of those portions of Franchisee's Emergency Response Plan
that Franchisee makes generally publicly available will be provided to the City at the coordination
meeting, aiong with appropriate telephone number and pager numbers during each emergency.
Section 19. Default
19.1 Notice of Default. If Franchisee shall fail to camply with any of the provisions of this
Franchise, the City may serve a written notice to Franchisee ordering such compliance and
Franchisee shall have sixty (60) days from the receipt of such notice in which to comply.
Ordinance No 10- Page 1 S of 26
Rev 1/10
19.2 Revocation of Franchise. If Franchisee is not in compliance with this Franchise after
the expiration of the sixty (60) day period, the City may, by ordinance, declare an immediate
forfeiture of this Franchise; provided, however, if any failure to comply with this Franchise by
Franchisee cannot reasonably be corrected with due diligence within such sixty (60) day period
(Franchisee's obligation to comply and ta proceed with due diligence being subject to unavoidable
delays and events beyond its control), then the time within which Franchisee may so comply shall be
extended, upon notice to the Director, for such time as may be reasonably necessary and so long as
Franchisee commences promptly and diligently to effect such compliance.
Section 20. Limited Rights
This Franchise is intended to convey only a limited right and interest to Franchisee in the
Franchise Area. This Franchise is not a warranty of title or conveyance of any ownership interest in
or to the Franchise Area to Franchisee.
Section 21. Eminent Domain
The existence of this Franchise shall not preclude the City fram acquiring by condemnation,
in accordance with applicable law, all or a portion of Franchisee' s Facilities within the Franchise
Area for the fair market value thereof. In determining the value of such Facilities, no value shall be
attributed to the right to occupy the Franchise Area conferred by this Franchise.
Section 22. Vacation
If at any time the City, by ordinance, vacates all or any portion of public streets, roads and/or
rights-of-way within the Franchise Area, the City will not be Iiable for any damages or loss to the
Franchisee by reason of such vacation. The City agrees to exert reasonable good faith efforts to
Ordinance No ] 0- Page 16 of 26
Rev 1/l0
reserve an easement for Franchisee's existing or proposed Facilities when a street, public way, or
area is vacated. The City may, after thirty (30} days written notice to Franchisee, terminate this
Franchise with respect to any such vacated area.
Section 23. Compliance with Laws
Franchisee shall comply with all applicable federal, state and City laws, ordinances,
resolutions, regulations, standards and procedures, as now existing or hereafter amended or adopted,
including without limitation the State Environmental Protection Act; the Federal Occupational Safety
and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA), and the Washington Safety .and Health Act of 1973 (WISHA)
provided, however, that if any term ar condition of this Franchise and any term or condition of any
City law, code, ordinance, resolution, regulation, standard, procedure, permit, or approval are in
conflict, the term or condition of this Franchise will control.
Section 24. Guarantee
Franchisee shall guarantee work completed by the Franchisee after the date of this franchise
for a period of twenty (20) years from completion against settlement or conditions requiring repair..
Section 25. Charge for Administrative Costs
Franchisee shall reimburse the City for the actual reasonable administrative expenses
incurred by the City that are directly related to receiving and approving this Franchise. Nothing
herein shall preclude the City from recovering any administrative costs incurred by the City inthe
approval of permits or in the supervision, inspection or examination of all work by Franchisee in the
Franchise Area as prescribed in accordance with applicable provisions of the City's code.
Ordinance No 10- Page 17 of 26
Rev 1/10
Section 26. Indemnification
Franchisee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless and defend the City, its elected officials,
officers, empioyees, agents, and volunteers from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and
liabilities (including costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and aIl persons or entities, including,
without limitation, their respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising from, resulting from,
or connected with this Franchise to the extent caused in part or in whole by the acts, errors or
omissions of the Franchisee, its officers, partners, shareholders, agents, employees, or by the
Franchisee's breach of this Franchise. This section shall not be construed to require Franchisee to
indemnify, hold harmless or defend the City against claims or damages arising from the negligence
of the City, its agents or employees. In the event any claim, demand, suit or action is commenced
against the City that constitutes an obligation of Franchisee pursuant to this Section 26, the City shall
promptly notify Franchisee thereof, and Franchisee shall defend any such claim, demand, suit or
action. Franchisee shall not settle or compromise any such suit or action except with prior written
consent of the City, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. The City shall have the right at a11
times to participate through its own attorney in any suit or action which arises pursuant to this
Franchise when the City determines that such participation is required to protect the interest of the
City or the public. In the event it is determined that RCW 4.24.115 applies to this Franchise,
Franchisee agrees to defend, hold harmless and indemnify the City to the maximum extent permitted
thereunder, to the full extent of Franchisee's negligence.
Ordinance No 10- Page 18 of 26
Rev 1/10
Section 27. Insurance
27.1 Minimum Limits. The Franchisee agrees to carry as a minimum, the following
insurance, in such forms and with such carriers as are satisfactory to the City.
(a) Workers compensation and employer's liability insurance in amounts
sufficient pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington;
(b) Commercial general liability insurance with limits of liability not less than
$5,000,000 each occurrence and $5,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, including personal
injury or death, products Iiability, contractual coverage, operations, explosion, collapse,
underground and property damage; and
(c) Automobile Liability insurance with limits of liability not less than
$5,000,000 each accident for bodily injury, or death and property damage.
272 Mandatory Insurance Provisions. The commercial general liability insurance and
automobile liability insurance policies shall be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
(a) The City, its officers, elected officials, employees, and volunteers are to be
named as additional insured;
(b) Cov.erage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made
or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability;
{c) Coverage shall not be suspended, canceled, modified or reduced except after
thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City delivered by certified mail, return receipt
requested; and
Ordinance No 10-
Page 19 of 26
Rev 1/10
■
(d) Coverage shall be primary as to the City, its officers, officials, employees and
volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance by the City, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers shall be in excess of Franchisee's required insurance.
27.3 Verification of Cavera�e. Franchisee shall furnish the City with certificates of
insurance and original endorsements evidencing the coverages required by this Section. The
certificates and endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage
on its behalf and must be received and approved by the City annually. At the City's request,
Franchisee shall deliver certified copies of all required insurance policies.
27.4 Self-Insurance. In satisfying the insurance requirements set forth in this Section,
Franchisee may self-insure against such risks in such amounts as are consistent with good utility
practices. Franchisee shall provide the City with sufficient written evidence, upon request, that such
insurance (or self-insurance) is being so maintained by Franchisee. Such written evidence shall
inciude, to the extent available from Franchisee's insurance carrier, a written certificate of insurance
with respect to any insurance maintained by Franchisee in compliance with this Section.
Section 28. General Provisions
28.1 Entire Agreement. This Franchise contains all of the agreements of the Parties with
respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this Franchise and no prior agreements or
understandings pertaining to any such matters shall be effective for any purpose.
28.2 Modification. No provision of this Franchise may be amended or added to except by
agreement in writing signed by both of the Parties.
Ordinance No 10- Page 20 of 26
Rev 1/10
283 Assi�nt. Franchisee shall not have the right to transfer or assign, in whole or in
part, any or all of its obligations and rights hereunder without the prior written consent of the City,
which consent will not be unreasonably withheld. Any assignee shall, within thirty (30) days of the
date of any approved assignment, fiie written notice of the assignment with the City together with its
written acceptance of a11 terms and conditions of this Franchise. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
Franchisee shall have the right, without such notice or such written consent, to mortgage its rights,
benefits and privileges in and under this Franchise to the Trustee for its bondholders.
28.4 Attornev Fees. In the event the City or the Franchisee defaults on the performance of
any terms in this Franchise, and the Franchisee or the City places the enforcement of the Franchise or
any part thereof or the collection of any monies due, or to become due hereunder, in the hands of an
attorney, or files suit upon the same, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of all
reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and expenses. The venue for any dispute related to this Franchise
sha11 be King County, Washington.
28.5 No Waiver. Failure of either party to declare any breach or default by the other party
immediately upon the occurrence thereof, or delay in taking any action in connection therewith, shall
not waive such breach or default, but such party shall have the right to declare any such breach or
default at any time. Failure of either party to declare one breach or default does not act as a waiver
of such party's right to declare another breach or default.
28.6 Governin� Law. This Franchise shall be made in and sha11 be governed by and
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.
Ordinance No 10- Page 21 of 26
Rev 1/10
28.7 Authori . Each individual executing this Franchise on behalf of the City and
Franchisee represents and warrants that such individual is duly authorized to execute and deliver this
Franchise on behalf of the Franchisee or the City. `
28.8 Notices. Any notices required to be given by the City to Franchisee or by Franchisee
to the City shall be delivered to the parties at the following addresses:
Franchisee: Lakehaven Utility District
Attn: General Manager
31627 l st Ave South
P.O. Box 4249
Federal Way, WA 98063
City: City of Federal Way
Attn: City Attorney
33325 8`� Avenue South
P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063
Any notices may be delivered personally to the addressee of the notice or may be deposited in
the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the address set forth herein. Any notice so posted in the
United States mail sha11 be deemed received three (3) days after the date of mailing.
28.9 Captions. The respective captions of the sections of this Franchise are inserted for
convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed to modify or otherwise affect in any respect
any of the provisions of this Franchise.
28.10 Remedies Cumulative. Any remedies provided for under the terms of this Franchise
are not intended to be exclusive but shall be cumulative with all other remedies available to the City
at law, in equity or by statute.
Ordinance 1Vo 10- Page 22 of 26
Rev 1/10
Section 29. Cooperation/Merger Discussion
The parties agree to participate in a joint discussion to review the benefits of expanding the
cooperative relationship developed between them to better serve the public interest. The discussion
shali address whether, and to what extent, it would be beneficial to the interests of City residents and
Lakehaven ratepayers to merge the water and sewer utilities into City government. The discussion
shall be implemented in good faith and shall focus on ways that governmental cooperation would
make the provision of public services more efficient and cost effective. The discussion will evaluate
the possible existence of operatianal efficiencies associated with merger and non-merger scenarios.
The discussion shall occur no later than two years after the effective date of this Franchise. The
parties retain the authority to determine whether merger is in their respective best interests and shall
be free to advocate for, or against, merger in any proceedings that might be undertaken under RCW
Chapter 35.13A.
Section 3Q. Severabilitv
Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Franchise, or its
application to any person or situation, be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Franchise or its application to
any other person or situation. The City Council of the City of Federal Way hereby declares that it
would have adopted this Franchise and each section, subsection, sentence, clauses, phrase, or portion
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses,
phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional
Ordinance No 10- Page 23 of 26
Rev 1/10
Section 31. Ratification
Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this Franchise is hereby
ratified and affirmed.
Section 32. Effective Date
This Franchise shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30) days after its passage and
publication, according to law (see Effective Date below).
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of ,
2020.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, LINDA KOCHMAR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, CAROL McNEILLY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COIJNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.:
K:\OrdinancesU.akehaven Franchise 031005.doc
Ordinance No 10- Page 24 of 26
Rev i/10
ACCEPTANCE:
The undersigned hereby accepts ali the rights and privileges of the above granted Franchise and
acknowledges that such rights and privileges are subject to and limited by a11 ofthe terms, conditions
and obiigations contained therein.
DATED this day of , 2009.
LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT
:
Its: �
Ordinance 1Vo 10- Page 25 of 26
Rev 1/10
Map Date: March, 2010
C � ly � 1 Wate r Se rv i ce City of Federal Way
PO.Box 9718
Federal Wav Franchise Area (P)253- 35-7 00 98063
www
�eS �ent
�loines
com
u����rnl
'i��coma
CITY OF
:� Federal Way
reements\LU
0 0.5 1
Miles
1. mxd
This map is intended for use
as a graphical representation.
The City of Federal Way makes
no warranty as to its accuracy.
�
N
�, o , 3 Ecige�r+roacl
� ,r�:.
Map Date: March, 2010
C �ly QI Sewer Service CityofFederalWay
PO.Box 9718
Federal Way Franchise Area ��eralWay,Wa.98063
P 253-835-7000
(V� www.cityoffederalway.com
A� �; �
�V��iir�e�
�(f?(lt
\
r,
i�t�����r��
1_� �
.;�
�
;�
��tC#�3G�IU(J��
CITY OF
:�. Federal Way
�9t�
0 0.5
�
NerR 1. mxd
This map is intended for use
1 as a graphical representation.
� Miles The City of Federal Way makes
no warranty as to its accuracy.
�
N
_ I �,/ J .�<
Franr.hise Area M1�$Dil