PRHSPSC PKT 05-09-1994 •
City of Federal Way
City Council
PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE
May 9, 1994 <City D:al
1
8:00 a.m. Admmistrat�on: Confearence Room
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PUBLIC FORUM
3. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
A. Steel Lake Park Master Plan
B. Process III Presentation /Update for Visitation Retreat Center
C. Fee -in- Lieu -of Funds from King County
D. Discussion of Park Property on Eastside (Unincorporated Federal Way)
I. Appointment of 2 -3 people on "east side" as an advisory
committee)
E. Sports Courts at Retention /Detention Sites (a recommendation from the
Parks and Recreation Commission will be forwarded from the May 5
meeting)
F. Dogs in the Parks
I. Concerns expressed about dogs at the track at Lakota (a
recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Commission
will be forwarded from the May 5 meeting)
4. OTHER BUSINESS
5. NEXT MEETING
6. ADJOURN
Committee Members: Staff:
Ray Tomlinson, Chair Joe Stevens, Director
Hope Elder Sue Floyd, Admin. Assist.
Phil Watkins 661 -4041
• O 3A
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -107
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR FUNDING
ASSISTANCE FOR AN OUTDOOR RECREATION PROJECT TO
THE INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE FOR OUTDOOR RECREATION
AS PROVIDED BY THE WASHINGTON WILDLIFE AND RECREATION
PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Federal Way has approved a "Comprehensive Park,
Recreation and Open Space Plan" for the urban area which identifies a community, regional and
re
open space parks; and,
P P P �
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program, state and
federal funding assistance has been authorized to aid in financing the cost of land for parks and
habitat conservation areas and the construction of outdoor recreational facilities of local public
bodies; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Federal Way considers it in the best public interest
} to develop Steel Lake and Campus Drive Parks;
J NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Federal Way,
Washington.
1. That the City Manager be authorized to make formal application to the Interagency
Committee for Outdoor Recreation for funding assistance,
2. That any fund assistance so received be used for the development of Steel Lake and
Campus Drive Parks,
3. That the City of Federal Way's share of the project will be derived from City
appropriations,
4. That any property acquired or developed with financial aid through the Interagency
Committee for Outdoor Recreation be placed in use as an outdoor recreation facility and
be retained in such use in perpetuity unless as otherwise provided and agreed to by the
City Council, the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation, and any affected
federal agency, and
5. That this resolution become part of a formal application to the Interagency Committee
for Outdoor Recreation.
1 6. That adequate notification has been given and opportunity provided for public input and
that published notices have identified affected flood plains and /or wetlands, if applicable.
ORIGINAL
'0 0 .
7. That the site plan has been adopted by the local governing body.
8. That the City of Federal Way does certify that the City is owner of the land to be
developed and based on current knowledge, provides assurance there are no
encumbrances on the land which would restrict the recreation of habitat conservation use
of the land as proposed in this application
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON,
this 21st day of April 1992.
C , OF FEDERAL ;�
MAY $ R, ROBERT STEAD
// ATT 1
' TY LE' MAUREEN . SWANEY, CMC
APPR VED AS TO FORM:
ACTING CITY ATTORNEY, CAROLYN LAKE
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: April 15, 1992
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: April 21, 1992
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -107
1
• 1111 3B
•
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
1
DATE: April 29, 1994
TO: Arts Commission
Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Joe Stevens, Director of Parks and Recreati.
SUBJECT: Amendment to the Process III Application for Visitation Retreat Center
Accompanying this memorandum, please find the amendment to the Process III application as
prepared by Mandi Roberts of Otak, Inc. This item will also be placed on the Council
Committee for Parks and Recreation agenda of May 9 and the Arts Commission agenda for May
12. The limitation on the use is recommended in order to successfully get through SEPA with
a determination of non - significance.
EJS : scf
. i
• Ilk
IIP
•
s .
April 28, 1994 , •
- ft
RPLEIVED BY _,,,:,:„;,
Ms. Lori Michaelson Schill, Associate Planner
-epartment of Comm.unity Development Services ` up
P City of Federal Way 'IF t OPMENT DEN r , .,,4, ''''''1
COMM'AI f ' ..f
PIA 2 11 :14, .'1;1,Fv..
33530 1st Way South
; ,.lic H I c r,
Federal Way, Washington 98003-6210 , \
- , --,.. '4';',,i;
'Architecitim:P -
RE: _Amendment to the Process III / Site Plan Review Application ,!ia#rii]
for the Visitation-R,etreat Center ' -- ....'*,Ii0ipeslit4.:'4e Af
, . Develi5rifilont'l
--::,-.- .M,
Dear Lori, g1"-1 ' ' Attila eptiS
4:.:ciliv• ‘.g ' -rt4, 1
The Parks and Recreation.Departrnent proposes to amend the Visitation Retreat '''',.-TraPs.„.. ',i9F,t;.,
_ .
Center Process ID application. Where any references to prohibiting beach use :E 7, 1 : 111 )5knl'..-s,_, ,, i'‘!:1
- /
' are made within the application document or SEPA checklist, delete such :,,,.:,..WaterResources
references and ,add the tollowing text to the description of proposed uses to be ;,,YrYt',04t4,--",i;
DI
, „..,,, ,.4- -,-,,,, ,
apploved as part of Process review: ,t
_ ,
‘ :T
, .. --;:,, 7) , - ', ,-, ;
, ..,:. ; ,E.
N - Limitedpublicaccess to the beachfront adjacent to the Visitation Retreat k:4
Center shall be provided by way' of the existing stepped pathway located ,-%,./Itt.._:3
in the northwest portion of the site. In order to minimize potential ..., - :''4
,
impacts to the Dumas Bay environment, only passive recreational uses : . .,-:'' ...- ' , :',,_-ii
will be allowed on the beachfront. - ,.,
•. ..
_ .
- _ As defined by the Shoreline Management Act, as adopted by King County
and ( die City of Federal Way (KC Ord. 3692), "Limite4 public access" . .- - :-.-- -,.-:'
5,' '-';',. f. • •••
, means:
. . ..„ ,. ,.
.. 1.. . -- 1, 1:_: :.•-:i
, 1. Actual physical access from land to the ordinary high - -:-,. . -- -,. 4 .',. -_, - -
water mark or to the wetland directly abutting the ordinary . -
high water mark, such access being limited to specific
groups of people or to certain regularly prescribed times; or
-', -- - -
2. Visual access available to the general public to the
shoreline and adjacent waterbody, such access - .
being
-
specifically provided for in the developinent of the site.
, \ ,
The following conditions shall be placed on public access to beachfront
and the types of activities to occur there in order to mitigate potential
environmental impacts (i.e. litter, noise, wildlife disturbance, etc.) and to
provide for maximum public safety: .. -'.' . . . -- --
•
\ N
P access to the beachfront will be allowed only during low '- , ..', :: .; 4 ,<-.-t':..,!.-,.,..a.:-..."...,,.
tide and daylight hours. 1 :...( i --,:-, - -v '-- -
3 44.0 , ,
lif
... ...k'
No daycamping, fires or picnicking will be allowed on the ..: '- 6-' ... ...,. „...
beachfront/tidelands. (Picnicking will be allowed in the "viewing ;--::, :- '-'-; -: :-: :.4-
station area".) .v. s.w: BoOnes 'PeryR0161:,:',
Lake Ore ,
.'. (503) 635•3618 ' . -■ ,:
ifl All pets must be kept on leashes. - —
Fax (503) 635•5395
620 Kirkland Way, 8100 .
Kirkland, Washington 98033
(208) 822-4446
Fax (206) 827-9577 L . ' :',...
4
1 • 1 tal iN . S AY ' ! �.` �
L" K t' f=^`� SS ,t
. mow`, ;• „, +t ,t - 1 q ,,v ,
J y 1i•
Lori Michaelson Schill Ff * �' , r< x
April 28, 1994 ,i q ' - : } �
f � ' t
v
Page 2 -+ .. ^ ; Vin ' `.
1
i No bicycles or other types of non - motorized vehicles will be allowed '`'. , y ', , �
��n�� � � �` ` , � � ' te a:
on the beach,. (Of course, no motorized - vehicles will be allowed, .'_ '" `'
and there is no access through the site which could be used by ,..-# x ' , ` #.eY
vehicles to get to the beachfront.) < . -
- M No radios, music amplifiers or other objects which could create 03,1.i.,, } �1 Y' , M noise disturbances will be allowed. d .�M' '
Signs shall notify the public about the fluctuating tidal conditions ,,. ; n �:-
and the potential associated dangers of swimming in the area. , .. a . • , -
Signs shall also notify the public that no lifeguard is on duty. fi� ` °
- - The Parks -and Recreation Department intends to control beach access and • '' t • 47 �
use through signs posted at the entry to the beachfront, as hell as at the �', ..-' `
trailhead at the-top of the bluff. In'addition, a gate will be added, to the " . ` �
ardrail structure alon the top o the rock wall. The ate will be locked '�� S'''44. �q
g, P f 4 r A
during the hours that the beachfront is closed to the l;'
public. h �" � '
In addition the Parks and Recreation De art rent will explore the '. "' r � '
possi Of developing an environmental education pro "
gram for site. ti> • '- - 0 x
Such a program could include creation and distribution of brochures, if .* t
pamphlets or videos and/or installation of interpretive signs and facilities ,fit � � }',
describing the sensitive environmental conditions and important wildlife w , 1 , f
habitats of Dumas Bay. The program could emphasize the uniqueness of 'A �� ,
the Dumas Bay inter -tidal habitat, as well as the open space aonservation� r ��
planning associated with development of the Visitaton Retreat site. A •
t
Lori, you and I discussed the potential requirements for improving the existing 1
rock steps which provide access from the top of the rock tidewall to the bottom. -i °,„ >
This will be the only access available the public to get to the beachfront area " a"
a � � Ekt � .4:7,:. 3a
While it appears that no Building Code requirements would apply to this area F
of the site, as the project designer, I feel it is necessary to improve the access ` i , �` µf '�
way to provide for maximum public safety. • •. ri e
If you have any questions about this amendment, please give me a call. Thank rt 0," , ,
you for your assistance:.
a w
w T
� ,.t I
Sincerely yours, , ` t
f
I- : '_ '.,,,,:.1::,.:,-:,:zr.:,-VilY;;':i 1
Mardi Roberts, A.S.L.A. /A.P . l �k -• 1 ' �.
Project Manager ., , r .
d '
t r.
r' .r • _ //)G se-7 c / ,-''NIR / /Y>c•C'Af3� ` `
•
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 27, 1994
TO: Arts Commission
Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Joe Stevens, Director of Parks and Recr
SUBJECT: Process III/SEPA at the Visitatio etreat Center
Based on Arts Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission and public comments at the April
26 joint meeting with the Arts Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission, the Planning
Department was asked to revisit beach front access. Apparently, Process III can move forward
and access to the beach can be considered as a "separate issue." In short, if concerns around
the Shorelines Management Act are valid and water access is at issue, this can be addressed
without holding up efforts to open the rest of the facility and grounds to the public. This is good
news!
Based on that information, an amendment will be incorporated into the application requesting
limited or controlled access to the water.
Should you have questions or concerns, please let me know.
EJS:scf
c: Ken Nyberg, City Manager
Greg Moore, Community Development Director
• 11,5 nr-i
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY �u C ,.•�
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE � ,<
Memorandum ( C
O
DATE: April 14, 1994
TO: Joe Stevens, Parks and Recreation Director
FROM: Michael D. Smith, Acting Deputy City Attorne •
SUBJECT: Time Sequence for Citizens' Appeals of Hearing .
Examiner's Decision - Visitation Retreat Project
You have asked for a general review of the sequence of events and
time constraints imposed by City codes in the event of an appeal
from the Hearings Examiner's (hereinafter, "H.E. ") approval of the
site plan application on the Visitation Retreat project.
PROCESS III REVIEW
As we understand it, the City's Visitation Retreat project proposal
will be reviewed under Process III Review, pursuant to City Code
Sec.22 -476, et seq. In that process, the following sequence is
possible, assuming maximum use of all times available, and assuming
no unforeseen delays:
+ 0 Days Close of H.E. Hearing.
+10 Work Days Sec. 22 -487. H.E. has ten (10) work days in
which to render a decision following close of
H.E. hearing.
+7 Calendar Any interested party has seven (7) calendar days
Days in which to challenge H.E. decision by requesting
reconsideration. Sec. 22 488(a).
+10 Work Days Sec. 22- 488(d). H.E. must notify within ten (10)
work days of his /her decision to reconsider or not.
Total time: Circa 5 calendar weeks from H.E. hearing.
•
Federal Way City Attorney's Office
Memorandum to
Re:
April 14, 1994
Page 2
IF RECONSIDERATION NOT GRANTED BY H.E.
City Council consideration of H.E. recommendation
scheduled by staff. City Council required to
consider matter within ninety (90) days of H.E.
recommendation. Appeal from City Council decision
to King County Superior Court.
IF RECONSIDERATION GRANTED BY H.E.
+ 14 Calendar Sec. 22- 480(b). Community Development Director
Days gives at least fourteen (14) calendar day's notice
of H.E. hearing on reconsideration.
+ Hearing days
+ 10 Work Days Sec. 22- 487(b). H.E. has ten (10) work days in
Days which to decide following close of hearing. (This
does not account for number of days taken by
hearing itself.)
Total time: Circa 9 calendar weeks from first H.E. hearing, plus
hearing days used in reconsideration.
+14 Calendar Sec. 22- 489(b). Interested party has fourteen
Days (14) calendar days in which to challenge H.E.
recommendation to Council.
Total time: Circa 11 Calendar weeks from first H.E. hearing,
plus hearing days used in reconsideration.
City Council Consideration scheduled by City
staff. Sec. 22 -490. City Council required to
consider matter within 90 days of H.E.
recommendation. Following Council action on
matter, applicant or interested party has right to
request reconsideration of City Council, in which
case, time limitations of Sec. 22 -480 - 22 -487 are
employed to govern events. Appeal of City Council
action is to King County Superior Court.
K: \memo \stevens.vis
•
CITY OF
1_1171 E
(206) 661 -4000
NY� 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 -6210
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
April 13, 1994
Major Robert Evans
King County Police, Federal Way Precinct
34008 9th Avenue South, Suite 1
Federal Way, WA 98003
RE: VISITATION RETREAT CENTER — 3200 SW DASH POINT ROAD
Dear Major Evans:
This department is in the process of assesssing potential environmental impacts of a proposal to
convert the referenced site to use as a public park. Previously the site was privately owned and
operated as a monastery and retreat center ( "Sisters of Visitation ").
Enclosed is a copy of a letter from Michael McKasy, who lives near the retreat center. The letter
summarizes his concerns with the proposal, and are consistent with concerns expressed by other
residents of the area.
Specifically, please refer to page 2, paragraph 8, which states:
"We have already experienced vandalism and drug use as a result of the utilization of the
neighboring bird sanctuary... (Dumas Bay)...by the public. Late night parties, fires on the
beach, and drug dealing take place in the bird sanctuary, necessitating our continuous contact
with police requesting supervision. I am concerned that the availability and uses provided by
the Retreat Center will lead to further expansion of this vandalism and drug abuse."
To assist us in responding to these issues, we are requesting comments from your department. Your
comments will be incorporated into our analysis. The following questions could serve as a
framework for your response:
• Is the existing level of police service adequately meeting the demand in the subject
area?
• Is the existing demand seen as proportionate or disproportionate in relation to the
general community?
■ Based on your service data, would you anticipate a substantial increase in demand for
police services as a result of the proposed public park?
Would you expect to be able to provide adequate police services to meet any
anticipated increase in demand?
• Are there any specific measures you would suggest to control potential problems
related to safety and security? For example, park closure before dark, security gates,
24 -hour on -site security, controlled access to the beach, etc.
• • • •
Major Robert Evans
April 13, 1994
Page 2 of 2
Your assistance is appreciated as we evaluate the potential impacts of this proposal. We would like to
have your response within ten days if possible. If you need additional information or have any
questions, please contact me at 661 -4019.
Sincerely,
Lori Michaelso Schill
Associate Planner
encl. McCasy letter to Cheri McCabe, dated October 21, 1994
c: Kathy McClung, Land Use Administrator
Joe Stevens, Director of Parks and Recreation
File - project correspondence
TROUP, CHRISTNACHT, LADENBURG, McKASY & DURKIN, INC.
A •NOVCSSIONAI SCAVICCS CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
JOHN B. TROUP
6602 19TN STREET WEST
GEORGE W. CHRISTNACHT 564.2111
FRANK 8. LADENBURG. JR. TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98466 -6193 AREA CODE 206
MICHAEL J. McKASY
JOHN J. DURKIN
JAMES F. CHRISTNACHT October 21, 1993 agan PA�µE NT COMMUI?
p CT 22 1993
Ms. Cheri McCabe
Recreation and Human Services Superintendent
City of Federal Way
Parks Department
33530 First Way South
Federal Way, WA 98003
Re: Visitation Retreat Center
•
Dear Ms. McCabe:
I was advised by Lori Michaelson - Schill, Associate Planner.
with the Community Development Office, that you are involved with
the environmental review process of the Visitation Retreat Center.
As I understand it, the Parks Department will send an
environmental check list to the Planning Department which will •
then pass it on to the Development Review Committee and from there
it will go to Ms. Michaelson - Schill.
As a resident in that area, I am concerned about the
affects that this project will have on the environment and the
neighborhood in general. I would ask that you please keep me
informed as to each stage of the environmental review process. I
would like to see a copy of the check list that goes from the
Parks Department to the Planning Department as soon as possible,
if that has been submitted.
I would also appreciate it if you could provide me in
written form some sort of time table as far as the expected
environmental review process.
I have a number of specific concerns that I would like to
call to your attention with regard to the project:
1. As you know, there is a bird sanctuary on Dumas Bay in
close proximity to the Visitation Retreat Center. Any increased
foot traffic or increased water usage in the bay area could
seriously impact the wildlife that resides in that bird sanctuary.
I.
PAGE TWO:
2. Dumas Bay is rather unique in that, when the tide goes
out, the entire bay area may be traversed on foot. There is a
tremendous amount of sea life in the bay, including sand dollars
and other fragile entities, that would be threatened with any
increased foot traffic.
3. I am sure you are aware of the fact that eagles have
nested in trees directly adjacent to the Visitation Retreat
Center. Great care will have to be taken to avoid disrupting the
mating and lifestyle of these precious birds.
4. Dumas Bay is really configured like an amphitheater
and you will find that sound travels quite easily within the
confines of the bay. Great care will have to be taken to avoid
disturbing the natural setting of the bay, since any additional
noise or sounds will impact the entire bay area.
5. Traffic along Dash Point Road from Hoyt Road to LaCota
Park is extremely hazardous at the present time even without the
Retreat Center functioning. Any increased traffic will overburden
a road that is not designed to handle high volume traffic. This
problem could only be compounded by parking along Dash Point
Road, which has taken place since the city has taken over the
Retreat Center.
6. The high bank area in Dumas Bay is very fragile and
has a tendency to slip. Property owners are continuously having
to shore up the banks and any increased foot traffic from the
Retreat Center to the beach could seriously jeopardize the fragile
condition of that property.
7. The use of any boats or other crafts from the Retreat
Center not only is impractical, due to the tide variations and the
high bank property, but it would also pose a serious threat to the
sea life in the bay area, as would any recreational use of the
beach or waterfront area.
8. We have already experienced vandalism and drug use as
a result of the utilization of the neighboring bird sanctuary by
the public. Late night parties, fires on the beach and drug
dealing take place in the bird sanctuary, necessitating our
continuous contact with the police requesting supervision. I am
concerned that the availability and uses provided by the Retreat
Center will lead to further expansion of this vandalism and drug
abuse.
i„,
PAGE THREE:
9. A fish ladder was constructed on the adjacent property
owned by the sewer district as part of their recent development
program. Added pedestrian or boat traffic in the vicinity of the
Retreat Center waterfront could only serve to jeopardize the
progress and development of this fish ladder.
In summary, the City of Federal Way assured the nuns of the
Visitation that their Retreat Center would be preserved in a
dignified and serene fashion, with every effort made to hold on to
the prior peaceful nature of the project.
Any variation in the use of this property from its
previous passive Retreat Center operation, including the further
development of the property for parking purposes, will have a
substantial, severe, negative impact upon the environment,
including the adjoining wetlands, the natural habitat and the
existing storm water drainage. The only way to effectively review
all of the environmental impacts of this project would be to
prepare an Environmental Impact Statement relative to the project
and I would request that that be done and thank you for your
anticipated cooperation.
Very truly yours,
ICHAEL . McKASY
jt
cc: Lori Michaelson - Schill
> ' 1AV a '94 16: 21 QTAK. INC P.4
iz'' 410
�7.'•i'..`t_ -_ Toxicology Task Force 't
# J/
Avian Emtoxiontogy and Blocherristry r`
•
Joe Stevens December 13
Federal Way Planning Dcparunent
Sisters of y}
th.e Visitation Retreat ��
. r� r "� .. (�'` j` '
WA 98023 - *IF { r _ i
Way, 1'(1 �It9b1! ` - : ° ( i t ,.�,lu
Federal
SEPA Review of Sisters of the Visitiation Retreat Site •
Dear Mr. Stevens; ,
I am writing LO obtain information on the status of the SPPA review for the evaluation of
various options for the Sisters of the Visitation Retreat on Dumas Bay. 1 was recently told
that the SEPA review had commenced. i am sorry that 1 was not notified about the process, as
1 would have been interested in preparing a bid to perform. the SEPA review.
How will the resources in Dumas Bay will be managed? The SEPA review has • chtince to
become a document that can serve as a compilation of the various activities in Dumas Bay that
mitst be integrated to ensure the survival of various, natural resouces, specifically salmon
spawning and smolt survival, shellfish, and waterfowl habitat. 1 hops the review of the
various options available for the uses of the recently purchased Sisters of the Visitation
Retreat property on Dumas Bay will include the following information:
°' • .Aiu . accurate oceanographic description of Dumas Bay, including hydrography and beach
description- This should also include current activities such as moorage, public access.
•
• An accurate description of the resources in Dumas Bay, especially a description of the
benthic vegetation and salmanid habitat.. Any information on the shellfish at the site
• should be pieented
•
• • • ;:Current and proposed status of salmonid creeks in Dumas Bay, and responsibthty for the
monitoring of these creeks. This iaiclt'des such activities as watershed runoff
management, development arid maintenance of wetlands at the mouth of the creeks, and
kt~.aping stre ms open for spawning.
. Estimates of increased beachfront useage with the various options for use of the Retreat '
atzarzshiP of uses of the Dw na, Bay County Foam w l h the aon
• Ownership ofundeveloped Ia , along or sd ^?i�t �o To. s yRetreat ay "Lna-t Ide p aid e watershed
protection and habitat .for Dumas Hay. _
As a biologist wbo'bns studied the heron colony at the Dumas Bay County Pant, 1 will supply .
information odd* impacts of the Various options, should 1 be presented with the information.
if you would Mtn this information to be included in the draft SEPA. review, please get in touch
• • with me, or have the reviewer do so. Please keep me informed about the project.
Sincerely,
Donald Norman.
€tl; �� o f,,
2112 NW 199th SL Seattle, WA 98177 Telephone (206) 542 -1275 FAX 542 -1388
Mn sd oA "Recycle 100 ". 440% post-consumer warn, ahlarine froo paper. •
. .,...„..!" MAY 03 '94 1620 OTAK, INC P.2
, ...••• . . „
: I .- , !•.‘'.. ::... ,, , , , III
7.----- — 6:e e-otel
-
H IA 3 994 .
2 7 V*fs—
k t—ut-1 V LE) r
,• ------...- .
a." C --ile,e‘i 64'7, 0 ) •lize,. a5/>4 (- 6,1 j- cji_ IA
7:77 ,/..2,a, 0 c,".
(I ()
WIZI Mt. 4, 4- i tt, c c-% >Z 7 ''L 6/ r z a / ee #
(...i 0 .
7Th
v . ,
jeki- 44 V-
a-kW o/A41-6, kz/tt.-::&. 0 A..aus c-ce-pc,, 4e
,,
afg, ailzeyeic/it„' c./Lee,hZ/si -A.,;) 4 /-- cefrtce,-7
clz ,zied-eic,44, V, /e/e6e, 7,L,,,
6
,: ipi.„ - '
,./ le,i_46., ae..,, ' 7 9,
k h. Aavt, JAixc?‘ 1.-c, 4.,e, ,,,/,/, e 17,e,d gy 7 •k/c:crZ
a/fez& / 1- 2 a - 41: ke, k,cee 064r-ed c2zz.z_
1
' 4 . - • i
lir , etzeci,g . e _, ie ,4 e , /bizeze) Ozzload
f .
azk.Ce il/C
i 77 , 6 , 4 de,A0‘66-z."--e-Z Teei-x-- kiez.v
za,c,a1.6,r,....0tee;e eiolee,,C‘ g. cM'eceiz,allete-.,„ Vit& CI e s e - •
(1
62,6„dec /1,6 y 4
te to ed-deorez,, &zi
(7- pc. 4,
: ?Y 03 ' 9 : 4 4 1:21 0 ... eaztva, __
, ,Lae z..„;.., ..., • ,,, /...,4 , ,..:
F ,
/,
,.,
.,,zc
/2
il
e&XZCi p-ree-‘ c 7 &
2,te, ,lee kezi-L/ 1 4 " z“ C/)-(-.e> ' Cf 4.e.
:/ j.,--) 2' $
67) 72.zelidc le-ae:Z_ (),:al Zi- ``/,a '
ok, QM/2,, c49_,L, „defre.,, 62a, cc:;-c1 are_
e'441-e-di '-'
1 i'eLie, 42 Crneat6,e' It" el-/ Ce;1"LY
a ' /
24 - 6 .4r-,e,taikik, .09k, /f.f://la,44.., c,,ed £
144,:e.,/ -laiz/cee.
ac zil‘
ex .
I
• 411 Item 3C •
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Memorandum
DATE: May 3, 1994
TO: Kenneth E. Nyberg, City Manager
Joe Stevens, Parks and Recreat rector
FROM: Carolyn A. Lake, City Attorn•�0A
SUBJECT: Modification to City of Fed= 'ay /King County
Transfer of Park Fee -In -Lieu o - unds
As a follow up to my previous communication to you via e-mail,
attached please find the latest version of the Interlocal Agreement
between Federal Way and King County relating to the transfer of
park development and fee -in -lieu of funds.
As previously communicated to you, the Agreement (unfortunately)
still contains some terms for which the City of Federal Way cannot
comply including compliance with County bidding requirements and
County affirmative action and MWBE requirements. Although King
County has communicated their intention to obtain a waiver to these
unacceptable provisions, I am still uncomfortable with the client- -
City of Federal Way -- signing the document in its present form,
without reference to the waivers. Accordingly, I have modified the
document on the signature page to expressly provide that Federal
Way's execution of the Agreement is specifically contingent upon
successful waiver from King County of the inapplicable provisions.
With the addition of this language, and contingent upon agreement
as to the final amount of fees to be transferred, I have approved
the Interlocal for the City's execution.
MEMO \FEEINLU.PK
4 •
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND KING COUNTY RELATING TO TRANSFER
OF PARK DEVELOPMENT AND FEE -IN -LIEU OF FUNDS
This Agreement is entered into between the City of Federal Way, a
municipal corporation of the State of Washington (hereinafter referred to as
"City "), and King County, a home rule charter county, a political subdivision
of the State of Washington (hereinafter referred to as "County ").
WHEREAS, prior to the incorporation of the City of Federal Way, the
County had jurisdiction over land use, park development and open space areas
in the area now incorporated as the City of Federal Way; and
WHEREAS, while under its jurisdiction, the County collected park
development fee -in- lieu -of funds from applicants for approved land use permits;
and
WHEREAS, upon incorporation, the City assumed jurisdiction for park
development and open space improvements within its boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the City and County desire an orderly transfer of fee -in- lieu -of
funds.
IN CONSIDERATION OF MUTUAL COVENANTS SET FORTH HEREIN, THE CITY AND
COUNTY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
I. Disposition and Application of Funds. The County shall transfer to
the City the fee -in- lieu -of funds and a current expense allocation, now under
the County's control, applicable to park development and open space
improvements within the City as shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
The City shall apply all funds received to the projects listed on Exhibit
A pursuant to King County Code (KCC) §19.38.010. The City shall allocate such
funds to the specific project within three years or refund the funds to the
property owner in accordance with KCC §19.38.070.
II. Hold Harmless and Indemnification. The City agrees to hold
harmless, indemnify and defend at its own expense the County, its officers,
agents, and employees, from and against any and all claims, judgments, actions,
suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, or damages arising out of or in any
way resulting from the negligent acts of omissions of the City, its officers,
employees and /or agents, in the course of its performance under this Agreement.
In the event that any suit based upon such a claim, judgment, action, loss,
cost, expense or damage is brought against the City or the City and the County,
the City shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense, and if final
judgment be rendered against the City and its officers, agents, and employees
or jointly against the City and the County and their respective officers,
agents and employees, the City shall satisfy the same.
For this purpose, the City, by mutual negotiation, hereby waives, as
respect to the County only, any immunity that would otherwise be available
against such claims under the Industrial Insurance Provision of RCW Title 51.
In the event the County incurs any judgment, award and /or cost arising
therefrom, including attorneys' fees to enforce the provisions of this article,
• 4
all such fees, expenses and costs shall be recoverable from the City.
The County agrees to hold harmless, indemnify and defend at its own
expense the City, its officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and
all claims, judgments, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, or
damages arising out of or in any way resulting from the negligent acts of
omissions of the County, its officers, employees and /or agents, in the course
of its performance under this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon
such a claim, judgment, action, loss, cost, expense or damage is brought
against the County or the City and the County, the County shall defend the same
at its sole cost and expense, and if final judgment be rendered against the
County and its officers, agents, and employees or jointly against the City and
the County and their respective officers, agents and employees, the County
shall satisfy the same.
If any claim, judgment, action, suit, liability, loss, cost, expense or
damage arise out of or result from the joint negligent acts of both the County
and the City, each party shall be responsible for its own share of any
resulting
The provisions of this section shall survive the termination of this
Agreement.
III. Insurance Requirements.
A. By the date of execution of this Agreement, the City shall procure
and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance against
claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may
arise from, or in connection with the performance of work hereunder
by the City, its agents, representatives, employees, and /or
subcontractors. The cost of such insurance shall be paid by the
City or its subcontractor. The City may furnish separate
certificates of insurance and policy endorsements for requirements
of this Agreement.
• - -- For All Coverage:
Each insurance policy shall be written on an "Occurrence" form;
excepting that insurance for Professional Liability, Errors and
Omissions when required, may be acceptable on a "claims made" form.
If coverage is approved and purchased on a "claims made" basis, the
City warrants continuation of coverage, either through policy
renewals or the purchase of an extended discovery period, if such
extended coverage is available, for not less than three years from
the date of completion of the work which is subject of this
Contract.
B. Minimum Scope of Insurance.
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
2
•
1. General Liability:
Insurance Services Office form number (CG 00 01 Ed. 11 -88)
covering COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY.
2. Professional Liability:
Professional Liability, Errors and Omissions coverage. In
the event that services delivered pursuant to this Contract
either directly or indirectly involve or require professional
services, Professional Liability, Errors and Omissions
coverage shall be provided. "Professional Services ", for the
purpose of this Contract section shall mean any services
provided by a licensed professional.
3. Automobile Liability:
Insurance Services Office form number (CA 00 01 Ed. 12 -90)
covering BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE, symbol 1 "any auto "; or the
combination of symbols 2, 8, and 9.
C. Minimum Limits of Insurance.
The City shall maintain limits no less than, for:
1. General Liability: $ 2,000,000 combined single limit per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property
damage, and for those policies with aggregate limits, a
$ 2,000,000 aggregate limit.
2. Professional Liability, Errors and Omissions: $ 2,000,000.
3. Automobile Liability: $ 1,000,000 combined single limit per
accident for bodily injury and property damage.
D. - Deductibles and Self - Insured Retentions.
Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to, and
approved by, the County. The deductible and /or self- insured
retention of the policies shall not limit or apply to the City's
liability to the County and shall be the sole responsibility of the
City.
E. Other Insurance Provisions.
The insurance policies required in this Agreement are to contain,
or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
1. General Liability Policy: •
a. The County, its officers, officials, employees and
agents are to be covered as additional insureds as
respects: liability arising out of activities
3
•
performed by or on behalf of the City in connection
with this contract.
b. To the extent of the City's negligence, the City's
insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as
respects the County, its officers, officials,
employees and agents. Any insurance and /or self -
insurance maintained by the County, its officers,
officials, employees or agents shall not contribute
with the City's insurance or benefit the City in any
way.
c. The City's insurance shall apply separately to each
insured against whom a claim is made and /or lawsuit is
brought, except with respect to the limits of the
insurer's liability.
2. All Policies:
Coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled, reduced
in coverage or in limits, except by the reduction of the
applicable aggregate limit by claims paid, until after forty -
five (45) days prior written notice, has been given to the
County.
F. Acceptability of Insurers.
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with the Bests' rating of
no less than A:VIII, or if not rated with Bests', with minimum
surpluses the equivalent of Bests' surplus size VIII.
Professional Liability, Errors and Omissions insurance may be
placed with insurers with a Bests' rating of B+ :VII. Any
exceptions must be approved by the County.
-If at any time of the foregoing policies shall be or become
unsatisfactory to the County, as'to form or substance, or if a
company issuing any such policy shall be or become unsatisfactory
to the County, the City shall, upon notice to that effect from the
County, promptly obtain a new policy, and shall submit the same to
the County, with the appropriate certificates and endorsements, for
approval.
G. Verification of Coverage.
The City shall furnish the County with certificates of insurance
and endorsements required by this contract. The certificates and
endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The
certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be
on forms approved by the County and are to be received and approved
by the County prior to the commencement of activities associated
with the Agreement. The County reserves the right to require
4
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at
any time.
H. Subcontractors.
The City shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its
policies, or shall furnish separate certificates of insurance and
policy endorsements for each subcontractor. Insurance coverages
provided by subcontractors as evidence of compliance with the
insurance requirements of this Agreement shall be subject to all
of the requirements stated herein.
IV. Bidding and Contracting. The City shall be responsible for
complying with all applicable public bidding and contracting laws; provided,
that if the County would have been required to award any contract awarded by
the City hereunder through a competitive bidding process, the City shall itself
follow such a process; provided further, that any such competitive process
followed by the City shall at a minimum follow the statutory requirements the
County would have had to have followed in awarding such contract, including
those relating to public advertising, licensed contractors, contractor bid and
performance bonds, retainage, the payment of prevailing wages, and the award
of such contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
V. Nondiscrimination. King County Code Chapters 12.16 and 12.18 are
incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein and the City agrees to
abide by all the conditions of said Chapters. Failure by the City to comply
with any requirements of these Chapters shall be a material breach of contract.
A. During the performance of this Contract, neither the city nor any
party subcontracting under the authority of this Contract shall
discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion,
nationality, creed, marital status, sexual orientation, age, or
presence of any sensory, mental, or physical handicap in the
employment or application for employment or in the administration
or delivery of services or any other benefits under this Contract.
The City shall comply fully with all applicable federal, state and
local laws, ordinances, executive orders and regulations which
prohibit such discrimination. These laws include, but are not
limited to, RCW Chapter 49.60 and Titles VI and VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964.
B. If the City fails to comply with King County Code Chapter 12.16,
such failure shall be deemed a violation of this Chapter and a
material breach of this Contract. Such breach shall be grounds for
cancellation, termination or suspension of this Contract, in whole
or in part.
C. During the performance of this Contract, neither the City not any
party subcontracting under the authority of this Contract shall
engage in unfair employment practices. It is an unfair employment
practice for any:
5
• 4
1. employer or labor organization to discriminate against any
person with respect to referral, hiring, tenure, promotion,
terms, conditions, wages or other privileges of employment;
- 2. employment agency or labor organization to discriminate
against any person with respect to membership rights and
privileges, admission to or participation in any guidance
program, apprenticeship training program, or other
occupational training program;
3. employer, employment agency, or labor organization to print,
circulate, or cause to be printed, published or circulated,
any statement, advertisement, or publication relating to
employment or membership, or to use any form of application
therefore, which indicates any discrimination unless based
upon a bona fide occupation qualification;
4. ° employment agency to discriminate against any person with
respect to any reference for employment or assignment to a
particular job classification;
5. employer, employment agency or labor organization to
retaliate against any person because this person has opposed
any practice forbidden by King County Code Chapter 12.18 or
because that person has made a charge, testified or assisted
in any manner in any investigation, preceding or hearing
initiated under the provisions of King County Code, Chapter
12.18;
6. publisher, firm, corporation, organization or association
printing, publishing or circulating any newspaper, magazine
or other written publication to print or cause to be printed
or circulated any advertisement with knowledge that the same
is in violation of King County Code Section 12.18.030 C., or
to segregate and separately designate advertisements as
applying only to men and women unless such discrimination is
reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the
particular business, enterprise or employment, unless based
on a bona fide occupational qualification; and /or
7. employer to prohibit any person from speaking in a language
other than English in the workplace unless:
a. the employer can show that requiring that employees
speak English at certain times is justified by
business necessity, and
b. the employer informs employees of the requirement and
the consequences of violating the rule.
If the City engages in unfair employment practices as defined above,
remedies as set forth in KCC 12.18 shall be applied.
6
•
VI. Minority and Women's Business Enterprises. King County Code Chapter
4.18 is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein and the City
agrees to abide by all the conditions of said Chapter. Failure by the City to
comply with any requirements of this Chapter shall be a material breach of
contract.
During the term of this Contract, the City shall:
A. Comply, as to tasks and proportionate dollar amount throughout the
term of this contract, with minority /women's business utilization
requirements specified in the County's request for proposal and
identified in this Contract. If this Contract is awarded to a firm
or individual certified by the State of Washington Office of
Minority and Women's Business Enterprise and recognized by King
County as a minority or women's business, the minority /women's
business set -aside provision shall not apply provided that the
certified firm shall perform at least 25% of the work of this
Contract itself.
B. Request approval for any proposed substitution of minority /women's
businesses.
The King County Office of Civil Rights and Compliance will approve
the substitution of a certified minority /women's business when:
1. The minority /women's business cannot perform the necessary
tasks; or
2. The minority /women's business is unwilling to perform the
necessary tasks.
C. Comply with the original Contract percentage use of minority
business enterprises and /or women's business enterprises whenever
Contract supplements, amendments or change orders are made which
affect the total dollar value of this Contract.
D. Not engage in agreements between a responding party and a minority
business enterprise and/or '
p nd /or women s business enterprise in which
said minority and /or women's business enterprise promises not to
provide subcontracting quotations to other responding or potential
responding parties.
E. Meet the goals of this Contract for contracting with
minority /women's business enterprises. Any minority /women's
business enterprises associated with this Contract must be
certified by the State Office of Minority and Women's Business
Enterprise (OMWBE), recognized by King County, and have signed a
sworn statement verifying that it has been previously sought to do
business within the geographic boundaries of King County prior to
the time the bid or proposal is submitted. Recognition by the
County of certified M /WBs is contingent on the M /WB (1) meeting the
definition of a minority firm as now and hereinafter defined at KCC
4.18.010(U). (Note: for the purpose of recognition, the County's
7
411 410
definition of Hispanic is narrower than that of OMWBE. Bidders are
charged with the knowledge of the KCC 4.18 et. and (2)
performing a commercially useful function as now and hereinafter
defined at KCC 4.18.010(H). The determination of whether a M /WB
bidder (proposer) or proposed M /WB for utilization on this Contract
satisfies the County's recognition requirements shall be made by
the County's Office of Civil Rights and Compliance.
F. Minority /Women's Business (M /WB) Liquidated Damages: The County
in general, and the M /WB program in particular, are damaged when
a contract, or portion of a contract, to be performed by a
minority /women's business is not actually performed by a
minority /women's business in compliance with King County Code
Chapter 4.18. Because the actual amount of such damage is not
reasonably calculable, the parties agree and stipulate that
liquidated damages equal to the dollar value of the utilization
lost to the County due to the violation, not exceed 10% of the
total dollar value of the Contract, shall be the amount required
to compensate the County for resulting delays in carrying out the
purpose of the program, the costs of meeting utilization goals
through additional contracts, the administrative costs of
investigation and enforcement and other damages and costs caused
by the violation.
The City shall be liable to the County for such liquidation damages
in the event the City or a subcontractor fails to perform a
commercially useful function and /or operates as a broker, front,
conduit, or pass- through, as defined in King County Code, Chapter
4.18.
G. Maintain relevant records and information necessary to document
compliance with King County Code, Chapter 4.18, and the City's
utilization of minority and women's business in its overall public
and private business activities, and shall include the right of the
County to inspect such record.
VII. Inspections. Any records related to matters covered by this
Agreement are subject to inspection or review by the County or the City at the
requesting Party's sole expense. Such records shall be made available for
inspection during regular business hours within a reasonable time of the
request. Such records shall be maintained for a period of six (6) years
following the termination of this Agreement.
VIII. Cooperation. The Parties agree to cooperate to the fullest extent
possible in any matters relating to the implementation of this Agreement.
IX. Amendments. No provision of this Agreement may be amended or added
to except by agreement in writing signed by the Parties hereto' or their
respective successors in interest.
8
X. Severability. Any provision of this Agreement which is declared
invalid, void or illegal shall in no way affect, impair or invalidate any other
provision hereof and such other provisions shall remain in full force and
effect.
XI. Venue. Venue of any dispute related to this Agreement shall be
King County, Washington, and governed by the laws of the State of Washington.
XII. Remedy. Failure of the City or the County to declare any breach
or default immediately upon occurrence thereof, unless there is a time line
specifically set out, or delaying taking any action in connection with, shall
not waive such breach or default, but the City or the County shall have the
right to declare any such breach or default at any time and take such actions
that might be lawful or authorized hereunder either at law or in equity.
XIII. Entire Agreement. This Agreement is the entire Agreement between
the Parties. No oral promise or representation has been made that in any way
alters or affects this Agreement.
XIV. Affirmative Action. The City certifies that it is an Equal
Opportunity Employer and has developed and implemented an Affirmative Action
Program in accordance with the guidelines in Revised Ordinance 4 of the United
States Department of Labor.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the
day of , 19
KING COUNTY CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Gary Locke
King County- Executive City Manager*
Date: Date:
Approved as to Form: Approved as to form:
Susan Slonecker Carolyn A. Lake
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney City Attorney
C: \FEDWFILO.CON
*City of Federal Way's execution of this Agreement is specifically contingent .
upon successful waiver from King County of King County standard procurement
bidding as referred to in Sections IV• provided, however, that all applicable
public bidding and contracting laws applicable to Federal Way as a non - charter
code city shall apply; waiver of MWBE requirement as referred to in Section V;
provided, however, that paragraph V(A) shall apply; and waiver of Sections VI,
EXHIBIT A
Fee -In- Lieu -Of and current expense funds currently under the County's control,
applicable to park development and open space improvements within the City.
PROJECT AMOUNT ALLOCATED
Adelaide Elementary $ 41,048.00
Lake Grove Elementary 34,634.00
Mirror Lake Elementary 48,208.00
Panther Lake Elementary 36,755.00
Valhalla Elementary 17,858.00
Olympic View 19.000.00 (Current expense funds)
TOTAL $ 197,503.00
• 4
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND KING COUNTY RELATING TO TRANSFER
OF PARK DEVELOPMENT AND FEE -IN -LIEU OF FUNDS
This Agreement is entered into between the City of Federal Way, a
municipal corporation of the State of Washington (hereinafter referred to as
"City "), and King County, a home rule charter county, a political subdivision
of the State of Washington (hereinafter referred to as "County ").
WHEREAS, prior to the incorporation of the City of Federal Way, the
County had jurisdiction over land use, park development and open space areas
in the area now incorporated as the City of Federal Way; and
WHEREAS, while under its jurisdiction, the County collected park
development fee -in- lieu -of funds from applicants for approved land use permits;
and
WHEREAS, upon incorporation, the City assumed jurisdiction for park
development and open space improvements within its boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the City and County desire an orderly transfer of fee -in- lieu -of
funds.
IN CONSIDERATION OF MUTUAL COVENANTS SET FORTH HEREIN, THE CITY AND
COUNTY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
I. Disposition and Application of Funds. The County shall transfer to
the City the fee -in- lieu -of funds and a current expense allocation, now under
the County's control, applicable to park development and open space
improvements within the City as shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
The City shall apply all funds received to the projects listed on Exhibit
A pursuant to King County Code (KCC) §19.38.010. The City shall allocate such
funds to the specific project within three years or refund the funds to the
property owner in accordance with KCC §19.38.070.
II. Hold Harmless and Indemnification. The City agrees to hold
harmless, indemnify and defend at its own expense the County, its officers,
agents, and employees, from and against any and all claims, judgments, actions,
suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, or damages arising out of or in any
way resulting from the negligent acts of omissions of the City, its officers,
employees and /or agents, in the course of its performance under this Agreement.
In the event that any suit based upon such a claim, judgment, action, loss,
cost, expense or damage is brought against the City or the City and the County,
the City shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense, and if final
judgment be rendered against the City and its officers, agents, and employees
or jointly against the City and the County and their respective officers,
agents and employees, the City shall satisfy the same.
For this purpose, the City, by mutual negotiation, hereby waives, as
respect to the County only, any immunity that would otherwise be available
against such claims under the Industrial Insurance Provision of RCW Title 51.
In the event the County incurs any judgment, award and /or cost arising
therefrom, including attorneys' fees to enforce the provisions of this article,
411 411
all such fees, expenses and costs shall be recoverable from the City.
The County agrees to hold harmless, indemnify and defend at its own
expense the City, its officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and
all claims, judgments, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, or
damages arising out of or in any way resulting from the negligent acts of
omissions of the County, its officers, employees and /or agents, in the course
of its performance under this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon
such a claim, judgment, action, loss, cost, expense or damage is brought
against the County or the City and the County, the County shall defend the same
at its sole cost and expense, and if final judgment be rendered against the
County and its officers, agents, and employees or jointly against the City and
the County and their respective officers, agents and employees, the County
shall satisfy the same.
If any claim, judgment, action, suit, liability, loss, cost, expense or
damage arise out of or result from the joint negligent acts of both the County
and the City, each party shall be responsible for its own share of any
resulting
The provisions of this section shall survive the termination of this
Agreement.
III. Insurance Requirements.
A. By the date of execution of this Agreement, the City shall procure
and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance against
claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may
arise from, or in connection with the performance of work hereunder
by the City, its agents, representatives, employees, and /or
subcontractors. The cost of such insurance shall be paid by the
City or its subcontractor. The City may furnish separate
certificates of insurance and policy endorsements for requirements
of this Agreement.
- For All Coverage:
Each insurance policy shall be written on an "Occurrence" form;
excepting that insurance for Professional Liability, Errors and
Omissions when required, may be acceptable on a "claims made" form.
If coverage is approved and purchased on a "claims made" basis, the
City warrants continuation of coverage, either through policy
renewals or the purchase of an extended discovery period, if such
extended coverage is available, for not less than three years from
the date of completion of the work which is subject of this
Contract.
B. Minimum Scope of Insurance.
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
2
0 • vQ./\ ?
C(1 � , N CJ
c' `�' ,,^
•
,,, Federal Way Public School
s
• ,,- v 31405 18th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 941 -0100 or 927 -7420 �
• e •
BOARD OF EDUCATION SUPERINTENDENT
Linda Hendrickson G. Richard Harris
Ann Murphy
Helen Pepper
Gail Pierson
Orlando Trier
April 13, 1994 EC EIVED
APR 1 4 1994
PARKS & RECREATION
Joe Stevens
City of Federal Way
33530 - 1st Way South
Federal Way, WA 98003
Dear Joe:
As you know, the Lakota football field is a project that the Federal Way School District
would like to complete as soon as possible. This project was a commitment to the
taxpayers when they authorized the $52.75 million 1991 bond.
The Federal Way School District budgeted $237,000 of which $206,082 remains
available for the field.
We would like to be able to build it as a joint project between the school district and the
City of Federal Way. We think this would achieve a cost and use benefit for both parties.
If this is built as a joint project, the best solution would be to build the football field
entirely or partially on City property, since the land the school district owns around
Lakota Junior High would not accommodate an entire football field.
We would like to discuss this further with you. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please call me.
Since • ,
_...... /7
' z _,u
Donn B. Fountain
Assistant Superintendent
DBF:re
Federal Way School District 210 is an equal opportunity and affirmative action employer.
The Affirmative Action Office number is 941 -0100
04/14/94 13:05 FAX 1 2 41 5122 JEFF GREENE ASSO 49 CITY FW Z001
• C 7
Post [t" brand fax transmittal memo 7571 = of pages
ilia 6
f
m * 9gt....
Fax* all11111111111111
ASSOCIATES
PROGRESS REPORT
APRIL 13, 1994
SAGHALIE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL (#6) /CAMPUS DRIVE PARK
ARCHITECT: Erickson McGovern Architects
CONTRACTOR: L P & E Constractfon •
General:
Site: •Orbs being pouted in west packing lot.
•Irrigation lines being installed" in west and east lots_
-Drainage and irrigation which is being installed in softball field
bas been delayed due to rain.
'Irrigation was pressure tested in baseball field.
•Fir trees are planted around baseball. field.
Site conduit is being repaired.. Main electrical feeder to
Concessions damaged.
•Football field has been mowed..
.Baseball field is scheduled to be seeded 4- 13 -94.
'Installing downspout tie ins.
BuiYding: •Brick laying in progress at west facade.
•Exterior upper wails have been lathed and are being tiled with
brick.
•Soffit is being completed.
•Completing roof valleys.
•Finish coat of stucco is being applied.
•GWB is being complete at gym.
-GWB is being taped in lxbraiy and stage.
*Shop room has been tee..
'Music room and library have been primed ready for texture.
.Ceiling grid is being installed in west wing.
-Casework is being installed is science rooms.
•Domestic and heating water lines are being installed and
insulated at locker rooms and science rooms.
-Fire sprinkler lines are being installed at gym entry. -
•D cts are being installed in office.
•Electrical rough-in. is continuing. Lights and security are being
installed in west wing.
•