Parks Comm PKT 01-08-2004 •
--,,,,:,
•
• ` ��� ` QT Y t?F FL , �� � 3',,,, Ae ` �
F e r r
r F
�ro % roc
Tbur s+t, Ja ��ry ® , 2 , � onfer `
/' ;,,,/ ' i, \ \ .gym �6 {
AGENDA
I. Public Forum l 0 minutes
11. Approval of Minutes
111. C ommission Business 60 minutes
A. DeVry University Student Proposal Presentation
B. Work Plan Discussion
C. Armstrong/Thom Pr Discussion
D. Grant In Discussion
E. Kenneth Jones Pool Fee Schedule Potential Action
IV. S taff Reports 30 minutes
A. Co Center Update
•
B. Recrcation Progra Update
V. PRHSPS Co unci l Committee Meeting
Monday, January 12, 2 at 4:00 p.m., MI. Bal {c Con Room
VI. New Business 20 minutes
VI.
Next Meeting Items 5 minutes
Vll. Adjournment
Nex Mee ting is Februar 5, 20
•
• •
ti p' v zv` � M i
` ° too,y mb.04 4, i Q 4141 gr,44 1k1t Baker and are .
MINUTES
Chair Purdom called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Present: C. T. Purdom, Chair, Bill Foulkes, Vice Chair, Ade Bright, Don Dennis, Cindy Dodge,
Joe Henry and George Pfeiffer. Staff: Jennifer Schroder, PRCS Director, Kurt Reuter, Parks Operations
Superintendent, B. Sanders, Parks Planning and Development Manager and Peg Wright, Parks Operations
Administrative Assistant.
Guests: Mayor Jeanne Burbidge and Council Member Linda. Kochmar.
Bright moved; Dennis seconded motion to accept the November meeting minutes as written. Motion passed
unanimously.
No Public Forum.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
Work Plan and Capital Improvement Plan — Schroder addressed these agenda items by creating a packet of
information with the history of projects on the Work Plan that were prepared for the 2003/2004 biennium budget.
Review of these projects, the proposed Community Center, the new City Hall and transfer of the West Hylebos State
Park to the City, will need to be completed for the 2005/2006 budget. The packet included maps of each Park
Planning Subarea (Areas A -K) and public facilities (parks and schools) within each subarea. Questions were asked
about mitigation fees and Schroder explained how those monies are collected and distributed as they pertain to parks
projects. Commissioners asked what grant opportunities were coming up for which we could submit an application.
The grant funds would be directed toward improving current park properties. Chair Purdom requested information
on current and proposed project budgets. He also asked for a update on recreation programs costs and revenue. This
information will be distributed at the January, 2004 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting.
Olympic View Park Playground — Sanders reported on the community meeting held to gather input on the proposed
playground structure. The play structure is targeting pre -teen children aged 5 -12 years old. Four playground
equipment companies were contacted and asked to provide a proposal based on a $50,000.00 budget. Sanders
explained each proposal and reviewed comments made by those attending. She then pointed out the particular
elements favored by the parents and children. She stated that swings were the most popular component requested
from each public meeting. Dennis recommended and moved: Bright seconded motion to accept the Play World
Systems Structure design and forward to the PRHSPS Council Committee for approval at the December 18, 2003
meeting. Motion included that a climbing wall be added to the structure if it can be obtained within the budget of
$50,000.00. Motion carried unanimously.
Armstrong /Thompson Property Schematic Plans — Sanders reported on the Thompson property public meeting and
the enthusiasm displayed by those in attendance. Significant input was provided regarding recommendations for the
park plan and play structure. In the schematic design for the play structure, a skateboard grind rail was incorporated
per request from the local youth. This item was discussed at length. The commission recommended that the grind
rail be located in a different area of the park or totally removed from the design. The opinion of the commission was
that the grind rail presented an issue of conflicting uses within the park. They voiced concern over interaction
between skateboarders and those using the play structure and walking trails. Commissioners asked if the Last section
of the trail on the furthest south end of the park was needed. They feel that by eliminating this small section of trail,
it would save monies and could be spent better elsewhere. Sanders then discussed the Armstrong property per the
• schematic design map. Foulkes asked if the design shown in the schematic drawings could be built within the
proposed project budget. A report on the budgets for these properties will be prepared and distributed to
commissioners at the January, 2004 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting.
Parks and Recreation Commission, December 4, 2003 Page 2
STAFF REPORTS
Community Center — Schroder and Sanders reported that the geotech firm has completed the testing of the site and
most survey work is completed and under review. Drainage of the site is a point of concern with the consultants and
staff. The existing pattern of water flow on the site may require that the drainage system be constructed to work in
concert with the natural topography. A traffic study will be conducted to analyze the impact of this type of facility
on the surrounding street system. The architects are currently working on the design development P hase of the
project.
BPA Trail Update — Reuter reported that the trail re- opened the Friday prior to Thanksgiving. Severe rain
conditions caused significant delay for the contractor. The asphalt trail has been adequately patched to allow use
through the winter. The entire length of BPA Trail Phase I will be overlayed in the Spring (April). Staff identified
some problems with the re- installation of the outfield fence on softball field #2. A meeting was held with the fencing
sub- contractor and these issues will be resolved. Commissioners asked about the condition of the wetland areas and
if they had been restored to the original condition. Reuter explained that the contract requires the contractor to
restore the entire area as per the original specifications. Plant material will be installed soon.
Dedication of Karl Grosch Soccer Field — Chair Purdom thanked staff and commissioners for their attendance and
work on the Karl Grosch soccer field dedication. Despite a cold, rainy day, the event was well attended. Reuter
added that Grosch and family were very pleased with the ceremony and the attention given to this event..
NEW BUSINESS
The January meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission was moved from the Thursday, January l', to the
following Thursday, January 8, 2004, per Chair Purdom's suggestion. The commission agreed upon this change for
the meeting date in January.
NEXT MEETING /AGENDA •
Action Items: Work Plan
Armstrong /Thompson Property
Staff Reports
ADJOURNMENT
Chair Purdom adjourned the meeting at 7:32 p.m.
Next Meeting is January 8, 2004
•
•
•
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 30, 2003
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Jennifer Schroder, Director
SUBJECT: 2004 Commission Work Plan
The purpose of this memorandum is to assist the commission with the development of the
2004 -work plan. The January commission meeting will include discussion on development of a
plan for this year. If the commission is ready to recommend a work plan at your January
meeting, then the recommendation will move forward to the PRHSPS Council committee
meeting on January 8
Attached is a draft work plan for your consideration. The list includes items that are carry
forward from 2003.
•
•
Draft
Parks Commission 2004 Work Plan
•
TIMELINE 2004
ACTIVITY 1 QTR 2' QTR 3'' QTR 4 QTR
1. Armstrong Property:
Recommend Master Plan to Council
Recommend to Council preferred altemative(s) for
construction phase in 2004
Conduct •ublic •rocess for namin• a •ark
2. Thompson Property:
Recommend Master Plan to Council
Recommend to Council preferred altemative(s) for
construction phase in 2004
Conduct •ublic •rocess for namin• a •ark
3. Park Impact Fee:
Provide recommendation to City Council on whether
a • ark im • act fee should be considered
4. Lakota Park:
Update master Plan
Conduct public meetings
Recommend to Council • referred master • Ian
5. Sacajawea Park:
Conduct public meeting on improvements to park.
Recommend to Council Site Improvement Plan and
budget
6. Community Center:
Commission will monitor process and participate in
the community process.
7. Play ground:
Community Installation of Olympic View play area.
Parks CIP includes for 2004, funding for a new play
area at Palisades Park. Commission to recommend
the placement location and play equipment elements
8. Kenwood Pit Property:
Conduct public meeting to gather community input
for park development. Input to be incorporated into
•arks CIP list of • ro'ects for future fundin•
9. Recreation Programs:
Review recreation quarterly programs and revenues
Review Kenneth Jones Pool programs and revenues
Review pool fee schedules
10. Bike Facility:
Conce •tual • tannin • for location of a bike facili
11. Downtown Park:
Coordinate with Community Development Services
to determine /explore the location of and amenities
within the .ark
•
• PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
Date: December 29, 2003
1(1"9 •
To: Parks and Recreation Commi •
From: Jennifer Schroder, Director
B Sanders, Park Planning a d Development Coordinato
Subject: Thompson Property and Armstrong Property Master lans
Background
Included in the 2003/2004 biennium budget was funding to conduct a master plan and
design processes in 2003 for the Thompson (50K) and Armstrong properties (50K). The
budget also identified a capital expense budget of $325K for the Thompson property and
$325K for the Armstrong Property. The capital expense number was not based on a site
plan or community input, but rather an estimate of the amount of funding we could
obtain.
In 2003, input was gathered on how the community would like to use the properties, and
a consultant was hired to develop alternative site plans and cost estimates.
• Summary findings
J g
Armstrong Property -- The site is 20 acres in size, and about 5 acres of this is in Pierce
County. We are proposing to design and construct facilities in the King County portion
only. Pierce County intends to purchase the remaining acreage from the City when they
are able to extend their trail system to this point. Several acres of the site also consist of
wetland and wetland buffer, which limits substantially the area that can be developed.
•
The community's feed back included a very strong interest in developing a play area for
neighborhood children and for having a trail that would provide a walking experience
through the natural area. The community was concerned about the plantings that had
been installed several years ago that were not maintained and had subsequently died.
Total cost of the preferred sitc plan is estimated at $324,027. This cost has been achieved
by reducing the length of the trail, eliminating crushed rock trails that tie into the existing
informal trail system, and by reducing the amount of landscape plantings and irrigation.
Staff recommends the following:
1. Parks Commission to recommend the City Council accept the Master Plan.
2. To design the complete, optimum site development at this time.
• •
3. To construct the project in two phases. Phase one would have a shorter paved
•
trail, no crushed rock trail, and scaled back plantings. Some of these items
may be added as bid alternates, in case we receive better than expected
construction bids. Phase two would include completion of the paved trail,
construction of the soft- surface trail components, and expanded areas for play
meadows and vegetative restoration.
Thompson Property - The site is 2.8 acres in size and is heavily wooded. A branch of
the Hylebos Creek runs along the east side of the property, just outside the property
boundaries. Most facilities must be outside the 100' stream buffer, and for this reason the
play areas are in the central and west part of the site. An exception is the trail, which is
able to pass through the buffer area.
The community's feed back included strong interest in a children's play area, a basketball
court, and a paved surface for walking, skating and skateboarding.
The total cost of the preferred site plan is estimated at $329,658. Two bid alternates for
site furnishings would bring the cost estimate to $349,765.
Staff recommends the following:
1. Parks Commission to recommend the City Council accept the Master Plan.
2. To complete the design, based on the Master Plan.
3. To construct the project in one phase. Some items such as the site furnishings
may be added as bid alternates, in case we receive better than expected
construction bids.
Commission Recommendation
The Commission's role is to recommend to the City Council the acceptance of the Master
Plan and the scope of work to include for each project for this year.
Depending on the Commission's readiness to act on a recommendation, staff's
opportunity to present the Commission's recommendation to Council will be either on
January 8 or February 9 The completion of design, and the bidding and construction
timeline are affected by the Council's approval, so earlier approval will allow a longer
construction window, which is most desirable.
•
•
2
• •
• Armstrong Property
Property Size: 15 Acres
• Funds Available: $ 325,000
Costs
• Planning Phase Estimate:
Description Estimated
Cost
1. Site Preparation $ 44,800
2. Trail $ 41,200
3. Utility Services $ 9,400
4. Irrigation $ 4,000
5. Landscape Plantings, Fencing $ 32,900
6. Children's Play Area $ 79,600
7. Site Furnishings $ 11,200
8. Parking & Traffic Island $ 18,400
Subtotal $241,500
10% Contingency $ 24,150
• Sales Tax -8.8% $ 23,377
A/E Costs $ 35,000
TOTAL: $324,027
Alternate A.
Crushed Rock Trails- 24001f $ 38,400
10% Contingency $ 3,840
Sales Tax -8.8% $ 3,717
$ 45,957
TOTAL, including Alternate: $369,984
•
3
• •
• Thompson Property
Property Size: 2.8 Acres
• Funds Available: $ 325,000
Costs
• Planning Phase Estimate:
Description Estimated
Cost
1. Site Preparation . $ 46,800
2. Sidewalk, Trail, Basketball 1 /2 Court $ 37,700
3. Utility Services $ 9,400
4. Irrigation $ 30,000
5. Landscape Plantings, Fencing, $ 24,000
Bollards
6. Children's Play Area, Tot Lot $109,000
Subtotal $256,900
• Contingency -10% $ 25,690
Sales Tax -8.8% $ 24,868
A &E Costs $ 22,200
TOTAL: $329,658
Alternate A.
Benches and tables $ 12,000
10% Contingency $ 1,200
Sales Tax -8.8% $ 1,162
$ 14,362
Alternate B.
Signage and furnishings $ 4,800
10% Contingency $ 480
Sales Tax -8.8% $ 465
$ 5,745
Total, including Alternates: $349,765
14-
—
—
. . , st‘i
5, .*1'.1 ''`'" „ .4,10
- kt. .4s. ,4 :.„,,, I-, . e".... :( •,, ,..* . ,
,. . . ,
. .
J .
• ' „
1 I 01
, ko----- y cROSS
.____/'
_ , ..
"Trittirmly!"-- --------A. 1
: 111-1L4' . ,7,7;i:',_ -- /A;;;;„ 1? Is 1 ...'
•
"'".f. ik .0' e./*X, li ■ 1 ' ` , 4..,‘• ,
'. ,4 ,,....„ - , ,,, o , , \
, ! ,,,,,,„,,,..,,,,I,g-A.,, 4 .,,,,14 '.-epi.,,,q, Yr. \ itli.,0 . 4 ■
s /r);,,-;,:,-V:. . Y, v,1 i',,;
,
:
■ '
'
•
„,,,, / _
.,tio, ' . - ,i .,i Lidg■°""”, '
' - ' 1.0;... No, •
irg.193 j., wound
4 --
1
, 1-1-. ',': -.-;. — ,": 4 •,...;.; - , t
- '''''7' ,/, if -fil
, . ,,,' , ,k: '.,,,,', .1,, ,:',V", tt, ., .. ,,; f• 40 0 ' '!er 1, 40-1
.,74., -*Li.-
- ,
' ://// ' . %' r : a
rt. I ,' IL ;,!,,k44,1, ',„ ,,,•;,* '.*: '1,:,,,,!,,,, 0 1111. ,,,f/ '
*r" lv. - "" , "/ ,,;:, ' 04% 4; '
..... -,:t .;.' .-.=' - ' „ 1 i; 1 _
,, , , -' . ' '
l' ' . '.,; di a , 1
: t.... ',,,.`,,..' ,.: '.., - ',. , 1
,
,,,,.„!....,-,,,„,„,
.: ,,,,
/ ___.- ----LT- - !
AREA
416, ii)11° ji
PARKING
..
i gli .1
:
,..41, - ,011k.
43, ,,;" , jr. 1,,i
4" '`':,...,:••• :I`..- ' - 1 ' d, ii ii ; - - - ' ' i
, .
i 10 I I
I Oa
I
I ' I
2,.
I - '
WETLAND CROSSING '
. , t
t , ,
•
, , /1
, , ,
' ' . aeo
,
1 1 '
> .: .,.. , STREET _
„-,--ck ,/ '. it '.-
.t, L- —
.-... . *., , os -
..' -11if
- " ' 1--- -.: -,- ' 11 , . ei.,ID n ',
- . ,,.,. .....0.- . ' -:',.. „.., ..,........., .-.• ,,
FOUNTAIN - -: , ...„I , : i-t• ',,,.. . 1::)klete L
,
1's-4 - -Aii1/45 ' " ' - I ;', - `- ife 40.
/ 9 ,y;:,-,,-,---,,,. i.4.... - ,, - .r;,.i ., , 4,;::4'0, ' ' .
/ , I „,..7 :: r 7 , , +, Legend
99
‘i ' ' 4 ' ' d " 'o = 4".---- 91
/ -,
//' Ai 1.1616i4 j* 1i " . = ""
" .. r. ,,, m .
/EATING *Mt t ' , ' 1 •,,, a ,
I '
VVilibl . ' ■ - ' */ L V - 14;" mima----- .7,...
"---- ,/-,,,.--...; ‘,.%* 1.4 %. . --.t 7, ,t . i f,,. ;el
rola.° I
r . ,
um
0 . -REA .\ Ifiteik )... _ ; , , -i'.1,„‘.4,,,,,,,.. i INEW........ ,......Marith...,TrLS.TYr...94
994■94.
/--''-'''9) „ _.fl ' t ' . 1 ' 4 ' 1/•000111F
1
/ ////'::j / it--- -. 1-• —'
'
/ , ,( )j ) " — . ' .k.
o 6 ---='' , - --
I
-9
1 6 . . „. .....
o
, , ....
_ , - ...,'
4 - ......4.,*, -, ..,,,.. 1 - : .,
00 -- ........" 1
,..k„,kr ,... , -,..,
,......
- i
\—_________--„BAc,,z,,,,,g1;-.0.--,RT 0 7,,....=,:-.... „.. ,
PLANTING
1 ,
• I 1,.., , ,,,,,:',.
0, eV 1
4
PLAY AREA
4 '
•
T 18th 2003
AUGUST
•
■,,■ oit'rJ,
..... --...
4
Cu A Park ea e IV ana
Par Rec Trail Phase City of Federal Way
PA Trat
BDE-SIGN CONCEPT C Services
44... Federal Way
0 0
• Water '
, .
I Pond
I
•
___..
. ,
- .._
■ .
4i — ''S '4 '
Alt \
'1
' .
. .
• I 41 .
,•
4
. .- /
41Ip ra i
1 ' - i . .. - 001011-.' , . - "•'—i .-
I
........ . , , _ .. . ..,
.. _ • ,.. _ _ .. . 0
• . .
r -
. .
. - ' 1 / 3Ik ■ t ' _
;0 ‘•°;"' 2 - 7
1
' X
,- ..--- •
.. .
2
„...._ - . .
— Ad
-
, I
Cedar i '■ ..;' ', .. 3 .44- )
, .
' .
, . .
• .
1 . )
i I , , ....6:.;•_'' '' --”‘ '''''''' ',....,;J! -, Na,„ \ '. ' ' , •
....
. _-.. - . .... .
—
--- ... ._ ... , . , ....„ _ „ .
..- . ... ...... - . ..,...,_...
....,. ..
• / , ,, . ' ., . • ...::
• 4
.
!
. .. -
. ....
_ ...
. . _
. ....
. .._....... —
......_ .. . .. .4. .
7 11 0....taio ,
•"••;r:.;•-. ,,..,-....::::::.. \ I'
i ,, " ' .,''' , :::::,.:;: ,-, \ ■
-,... ,
I.
i. . . and Underetory ,
.. . . . .
i / _ . X heperree yiry4//ty. ''.... .
. .
333r.
. . . ,
Blofilter Storm Drainage through Natural
CONCEPT A PARK ELEMENTS Vegetation Prior to Entering West Hylebos
Creek
4' Wide Loop Asphalt Path (approx. 120011.)
Walking/ Runnieg Legend
Roller Binding
Bicycling lam Evergreen Trees ,if 0 ' E Deciduous v ines
- Play Area
- Structured Play Mound New Deciduous Trees Existing Significant
- (1) Half Court Basketball Court Evergreen Trees
-Mitigating View Screening of House
New Flowering Shrubs New li• wide Asphalt
Cedar Trees planted 10-20ft on center
-
: -Embankment at Park frontage removed to open views Trail
' into park. (trees affected by grading removed) Existing Vegetation
• , - Curb aad Sidewalk
. -
City of Federal Way
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services ik art OF
Thompson Property Park ol` Federal Way November 18th 2003
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1k Oki•I'H Y A NI) ASS()ClATES
• •
PARKS, RECRATION AND CULTURAL, SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
Date: December 30, 2003
To: Parks and Recreation Commiss;.
From: Jennifer Schroder, Director
Subject: Grant Information
As requested at your last meeting is information relating to grants. There are two main
sources we have applied for acquisition and development funds. They are:
State Grants
Aquatic Lands Enhancement Grant (AL.,EA) -- Application Due May 3
Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) - Application Due March 1
Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP) - Application Due May 3
King County
Youth Athletic Fund (YAF) — Application Due June
Conservation Futures Funding (CFF) - -- Application Due April
• The State grants are administered through the interagency Committee for Outdoor
Recreation (IAC). King County Department of Natural Resources administers the YAF
and CFF grant processes.
This is not a complete list of grants available, but these are the programs that primarily
match projects on the parks capital program list and are eligible for government entities.
Attached is general information about the state programs and of the YAF county
program. l was not able to obtain from King County this years CFF program
information.
• •
S
socQ <n- = W0� 000v co = W c am " 'p — ` o m" vc c D
`°< ° ea c a• -' o 0 3 t° 0 v C° a o o o . '71 0 « h o co �- a : — o o ° - n C CD
• Cn CD �_ N C � � 0 co • o = CD a- N• v CD c o N � = v CD N co O 0) i
CL
Cl.). CD O C L _ o rh cD ° rn o 0 0 c 3 W SD 0 3 p c -D . Vo • c 3 v °.. n' cn a ° N v c 3
° ( Q m CO n c n . n
cn C CD" v - 1 n 0 C D " 3 CD v a - 0 • CD" - 1 p' �- r+
cD n .. m =' _ c° -1 c D TI v v c a 8—'
v t» VI v v i co a N N a n cn c cn < N A u o A. r 3 ID
N Q ti o N m a o 0 0 ? _ b y o m 3 rn v - m a.
CD Cp a " ° ti c
3 o N v o c 0 0 _ n a " co N ' Q Co N - a n FA' ` 177
o Q o o 0 3 ° N * c 0, o o- N o c �' a n v pj o
o v 3 ,,-e• ° ° v ° o ° - p < - a Da v m ' v > > 3
F13 3 = _ (D C v -n a (c, ° cQ v (c . s» ` `< co 0 Q - ty
c° v 0 c° . -I 5 v v a ° - v cD :Z 0 cn o. 0 9" � :Z 3
m ..<
0. 0 ? Q N _ 3 Q c < (O cp c o v i i c c C
Cn
CD
a' • n .nl •C Al * � = o m °- v ° o� c CD
c r CA a° Q -• ∎ a o 0 0 CD
° ° o =
=c 3 xoc'rZ v 0)v -n r mCDa-
< c c= 0 cQ ° - v = 'Z ty o 3 - • Q on' m ° C ty a co Co
0' o c CD a= o CD v o O ri - p 3 <n a= Cvi, -� a 3 3 p ( D S -
° =': v v m N co" cn 3" (fl c° 3 p — m 2 3 a. o °-
3 0 c° c° o 5' v� v = o c ° Q. 3 c v „
i P o sa o o ° m =coil) o ° n < i c f' 7 v m • e , 0 n N v a) 2 - v - o T n p O n C7 O - p * O. o .. Q v
7r 7 cl --i p o ^/ J C - ° n
� _ ig :< -1" a F N v. Z(D = cn m o 05 sc
O c° a CD cn (� °, v cn cD Cn l ( 3 -
-a O
• co m ° c? CD 3 g 3 c 0 . -° c°
j ai v' G � °' Q v .T::-. v su --I (D ° n O o A_ C
re re-
• D� o v c 5" C° • � - c' = 3 �' m Q ? O CD y'
° iii -. -• < in
t d r< % CD C N 2 v .... A —I 0 m C CD C a CD
a Cn C7 a. 0_ (° Q n O n N
0 ca. m y cp t1' cu v (° m m - o iy = v
b n 0 -, c v
o ° � C C» C C = CD -' N
0..
= N g N o. CAD A y.
C2 7 p ' sn 6
v m ° c /n 0 ° -. n O Z Cn -° (f) m v 0 < °. -n < Z
p ° Cp' c a - 7 -C3 CD CD c
(175 ° (D m a e 4 0 ( 0 a. -v o-. < (D CD to a o O. n sv o _ m cn _ ° a a' co 6. CD 3 _ 3 0
v m ° c° CD S cQ a CD c o 0 c° " -° m o a v -° c° n S
a ° 5 0 3 N • N m �. n �• co m �• a �. O iv CD O C c o ' C ( D m °" 7 -0 C 0 3
cn CD - a N a S 7 C v CD 3 lo D
CD 00 N o N 3 y y v= a Q m U) F) c E- = y N
c of 2 7 co v '� o 5' o < c Q C _ D , o < < ' z ,„ c� o n o - a � `G
n ` m °- O a o - , Q m m Cn m < - C° 3 -. 3
n N ' (Q C » ' ` o Cn v - v `< v Q.
' O :-. \ C O co CD co Q c CA i N cn 7-3 5' t
= .. tea o"a) _; o' m v _ o v v C ' °'• � ° ° v cu ^0
° N . 7 ( 3 (D .. 7 n o- y a 3 v c° n = i n Z SD �° '° O '� �� � svccQ cDC0 � X
v O" 0_ 3 O CD CD fn' O O C . - « ° Vl' C
° o o o A c a; 3 CQ m ° c v C v '" o ._ D O
E,"-, o n � Q m N N = a. A" 0 Q o o °" Q .
3 m °`
0= 1 •— 'D 0 a� y cn v m e v 0 Q FD y ° � O ' m o Q ° o
• .
O O D v n r N v z -n z K K
AN
D o o Fr) m 1;,3 v � — ' 3 C (/) \ ) 4\‘ ‘i. 7.'
rn
51) ° CI) < o
N
CD o m ea sv n c n �i N D ,' P i . I . ur m c� t° -" """
a) ° m
_ r - �.��.
(1)
cQ o (A
E3 _ + . ..
v > O
3 v o
s< a
m v
n r r — m � C
CU ` o m
•
: : : EA Ef>
CD
CO
(D oo c N '< 8- 0 0 0 ::: m o o " o' '71
O W Ut 01 r•
c o ° a o
N
IV I
cn
V -, (D m cD 0 m m CD e a CO
N N N N N N c O
CO rsa
cn
SDI
r
`� m ° i' - Z Z Z -< -< - < cn
Z . 0 0 o c v CD
N
ca,
0
7
0#1444 44tb
C—
CA
m _a
z
i.
I m Z .< -< -< -< -< o co
co AI
1
0
0 r Z ae aa rww
IP
N O 6 O FD. 4 O i - N N y < CD
c, c) 1 d
cn `� 7 >
c
N
a
nt O z Z -< ° • CO 1 (D ' n ? O O 0 ( D N c O T
o
0)
1
. •
•
How to contact us:
,
Intern Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation
gency Coinmittee for
OUTDOOR RECREATION (360) 902 -3000
SALMON RECOVERY
FUNDING BOARD Salmon Recovery Funding Board
(360) 902 -2636
2003 Legislative Workshop
Funding Programs Available info @iac.wa.gov
www.iac.wa.gov
Two Side . Interagency
Co
SALMON
OUTDOOR RECREATION
+Recre -tio & Habitat •3Sal . habitat SALMON RECOVERY
FUNDING BOARD
• Salmon Recovery Funding Board 1999 -2003
699 projects- $132,640,204
4- -=i .. , Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation
3,483 projects - $654,662,835
Purpose of this Session
Introduce IAC & SRFB 0
Grants available C Interagenry
Answer questions 0 Committee for
OUTDOOR
RECREATION
III
1
• •
About IAC IAC's Mission...
:Name
♦Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation IS to foster the protection and
•Inc -the board enhancement of Washington's natural
•Office - a sate agency and outdoor recreation resources...
❖Marine Recreation Land Act - 1964
❖Distribution of funds We do this through...funding...
❖Plans and special studies
:Resource for others
IAC's Board Advisory Committees
0,1.* + Boating Facilities
SM. d W rlr
C Firearms and Archery Range Recreation
R. When I •
e1N.W.l
Doug o fP '"" �.na
C b.na �ian.F"'%N.ea +Land and Water Conservation Fund
t flI —
D.G.E..d R..wcr
Ra OM, M.o. Chan. PM .h•w I
❖ National Recreational Trails Funding
Sib Poke and Romat. —
q CI.ti WNiNd. ❖Nonhighway and Off -Road Vehicle Activities
.NS No.nW . DY.da N Cia Noma
D.,lm.d of Fib S Wiib — ❖ Youth Athletic Advisory Committee
nc
w.n.
�I cMiaa. Mar..
❖Special Committees
I
yr o
cma. v.M.vw
Grant Programs All about the money...
✓ Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account (ALEA)
✓ Boating Facilities Program (BFP)
✓ Boating Infrastructure Grant (BIG) • ALEA 55,400,000
• BFP 53,750,000
✓ Firearms & Archery Range Recreation (FARR) ®BIG 5 +90,000
✓ Land & Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) • FARR 5400,000
✓ Nonhighway & Off -Road Vehicle Activities (NOVA) LWCF $4.000,000
✓
NOVA $5,450,000
Program Recreational Trails Pro ram (NRTP) • }� NRTP 52,150,000
✓ WA Wildlife & Recreation Program (WWRP) 0 WWRP 545,000,000
✓ Youth Athletic Facilities Account (VAF) , , �h ' ■ vAF 58,390,000
_..__. 588,390,000
•
2
, • •
•
Land & Water Conservation Fund
Applicant/Sponsor Match (LWCF)
• Appropriations/cash ❖ Force Account �
+ ❖Active & outdoor
•:• Bonds • Equipment recreation areas
•:• Conservation Future • Labor of i t Acquisition &
,74 Funds •Materials development
+ Corrections' Labor Grants :• P ublic agencies / ` " i
+ Donations
E • ui ment • Federal •:• Lease fees from off -shore
• q p • State (except IAC grants) drilling permits
• Land •:• Federal grants
• Labor • Others
• Materials •:- Local Improvement District Program created in 1965
• Property Rights
- f ''
Aquatic Lands Enhancement
L. Account (ALEA)
E• Aquatic lands enhancement, protection, and access for ,rte • t B
public purposes k ,
•• Associated with navigable water bodies
• •} Development must be water - dependent.
•:• Types of projects North Bay Lyon Creek
• Habitat Acquisition
• Habitat Restoration
• Public Access
• Combination -.,..
+ Local, State & Tribal Governments
•:• Proceeds from the sale of resources or leasing of state- a.. t
x * l #,
owned aquatic lands f �r� , j / , , d , �r , ���"
Pend Oreille Lower Elwha
Boating Facilities Program (BFP) Boating Infrastructure Grants (BIG)
•Support motorized recreationa '
boating activities 4• Facilities that support vessels
❖Acquisition, development & 26' or larger ` .-- - 'te ,.-
planning • Development or renovation" '
❖ Public agencies ❖ Public & private entities
❖ Unclaimed state motor vehicle ❖ Federal Aquatic Resources y
fuel tax Trust Fund
❖Program created in 1964 ❖Federal grants t -,
+ Program created in 2001
•
3
• • ,
•
Firearms & Archery Range National Recreation Trails Program
Recreation (FARR) (NRTP)
❖Archery & shooting sports ❖Supports trails that provide a
❖Acquisition & development 1¶ backcountry experience
❖Public and non - profit ❖Development, maintenance & •
organizations education projects
❖ $3 from each concealed • Federal TEA-21
weapons permit ❖Federal agencies & non-profits . s
❖Program created in 1990 ❖Program created in 1998
Nonhighway & Off -Road Vehicle NHR Projects
Activities (NOVA) ,, „
❖ Motorized & non - motorized recreation Hiking
+Acquisition, development, planning , education & 1
enforcement, and maintenance & operation 4 ,,, - Iiii , :• Acquisition "
grants a • " . a Development ., ,
❖ Fund sources: ,.,.- .,... 7 _,, j r, " • Maintenance • •
•
1% of the state motor vehicle fuel tax ` • Planning
• ORV registration tag fees �°
❖ Public agencies (primarily federal agencies) and ':
some non - profit organizations
❖Program created in 1972 '- --�> Tp� ,, _. Equestrian
Mountain i ¢ ,
9
Bic clin ' , x ll
Bicycling
ORV Projects - ,, -, ,, Education & Enforcement Projects
•:• Acquisition
•:• Development Preserve ORV opportunities and
•:• Maintenance encourage responsible recreation
behaviors through
•:- Planning 4 X 4
positive
management. , - ,,
• S techniques. - , 4.4187.,„,0 1s ,
ATV �
Motorcycles
• 1
4
. • •
•
Washington Wildlife and
g Legislature
Recreation Program (WWRP) Sox Appropriates sox
❖Habitat & outdoor recreation ro ects Habitat WWRP outdoor
P 1 Conservation Funds Recreation
❖Acquisition & development Account Account
+General obligation bonds appropriated by the _L__ 1 �- I I 1
legislature z 3 a s 6. 7.
Critical Natural Urban State Local Trails Water
State & local governments only Habitat Areas Wildlife Parks Parks Access
❖ Program created in 1990 Habitat
25% 25% 15% 10%
:Seven sub - categories... 35% 20% w
15% 75% AA, 50% Ace 75% Ace
u..xoeUnallocated rd Unallocated
I T T
30% 35%
_ 0 sl.n Agencies any ❑ Leval Awake Only 0 sw. a Laval Agendas
Purpose 1. Critical Habitat
❖Created in 1990 to ❖ Provides habitat for wildlife
Acquire as soon as possible the most including game and non
• significant lands for wildlife conservation game species
and outdoor recreation purposes before ❖ Includes:
they are lost. • Wetlands & riparian areas x' z -, •
• Forests, shrub- steppe
❖WWRP has seven sub - categories... • Deer /elk winter range / ° _
• Fish /shellfish habitats
2. Natural Areas 3. Urban Wildlife Habitat
.8
+Protects high quality, native ❖Provides habitat for
ecosystems or unique wildlife, freshwater/ 4 '' a
plant/animal communities, T &E marine fish or shellfish in i ‘ '
species, or rare geological
urban settings
_ �:
features t r'.
❖ Must: ❖ May serve as a corridor for
• Have retained its natural characte wildlife movement
• Be managed for preservation, ❖ May include public use for
protection, and study interpretation and
observation of wildlife .,
•
5
• • ,
•
4. State Parks 5. Local Parks
❖Available only to the WA State ❖ Facilities for active or ,, .
Parks & Recreation ; ., � passive outdoor - ,R
Commission for acquisition and recreation
development of state park ❖May contain both °�-
facilities upland and water
oriented elements
a � ❖ Most competitive a �
- -� .,,.._ , grant program • �� ,
Acquisition, development, and renovation 6. Trails
❖Facilities for
pedestrian, 1
"tr ms's s� equestrian, bicycle, l a "
�
` or cross - country � •
: . ski trails ��
.....
• Non - motorized
• activities only
�.
7. Water Access Youth Athletic Facilities (YAF)
❖Projects that provide ❖Funding for athletic facilities ,,
physical access to +Priority for youth oriented
shorelines for water y Y ! ^`
facilities
related recreation ❖Acquisition, development and
❖Primarily non- y maintenan
motorized activities •
❖Funding source: ' 1
•
• Initial donation 'x
• Interest on bonds'
+Program created in 1998
•
6
• .
•
2004 Application Workshops f SALMON
January 27 RECOVERY
Vancouver
January
Bremerton FUNDING
> January 29 R
Mount Vernon 2 BOARD
What is the SRFB?
❖ Stands for "Salmon Recovery Funding Board" SRFB's Mission...
... refers to Board, agency, & staff
• ...is to support salmon recovery by funding
+ Established 1999 — Salmon Recovery Act habitat protection and restoration projects, and
related programs and activities that produce
❖ Distributes public funds to recover salmon sustainable and measurable benefits for fish
and their habitat.
SRFB fulfills its mission by: SRFB Members
❖Five citizen members
• Funding habitat proiects recommended by lead • Appointed by the Governor
entities that protect, preserve, restore and
enhance salmon habitat and watershed • Representatives from across the state
functions ❖Five state agency representatives
• Department of Fish & Wildlife
❖ Funding activities that are integral to protecting • Department of Natural Resources
or improving salmon habitat • Department of Ecology
• Department of Transportation
• Conservation Commission 4]
•
7
• •
•
First met on August 20, 1999 The SRFB's funding strategy
consists of:
- - -- - ❖Guiding principles
+Policies & priorities to evaluate lead entity
strategies & projects
4<2, gym m 41. . ,... A4t
❖An evaluation & decision- making process
f �
s Science -based decisions
Salmon Project Status
° 26 Lead Entities are:
Funding Fiscal Yr * Active # Pending *Completed Total * ❖ Authorized by state law
Cycle
GSRO 1999 49 0 119 168
IRT 1999 3 0 91 94 +Organizations of local or regional groups
Early 2000 2000 50 0 30 80 •
4• Cities, counties, tribes, nonprofits, & others
2nd Round 2001 114 0 33 147
2000
3'd Round 2002 123 3 5 131 ❖Funded by Department of Fish & Wildlife
2001
4t Round 2003 52 27 0 79
2002 - ��k- -.�
Totals 391 30 278 699 P .IFE
Percent % 56 4 40 100
66% of the state is covered by Lead Entities 75 °/. to 7 ESA recovery regions with 15 salmon listings
T . Salmon R.cover Fund Boud
momo Outd Ora W n. A.. g in m.nb - 2003
swc By WRIA
Grp`
' - 0- ' 1 : 04 1:At 44 ' lip L t d 4 *Oie. k o 1
- . .
+� Columbia • ,
®w.m... � - ceiumbicithwe
C3 hM UOa
•
8
• •
•
Projects Funded ; -s: -'
In the Puget A Lead Entity's role is to:
Sound Area c.;
FY 2000 - 2003 'N..-.) F - = - , ❖Form a citizen's committee
w ` ' ;, •. . . :•Form a technical committee
.0 ❖Prepare a strategy
`
- . J + � :Solicit project applications
��
❖ Create a habitat work schedule
`: +Create a list of projects for the SRFB
Iv
Vier
Eligible Applicants Eligible Project Types
❖ Cities ❖Acquisition
❖Counties ❖In -stream diversion
❖Non- profits ❖In- stream passage
• ❖ Private landowners +In-stream habitat
❖Conservation districts ❖Riparian habitat
❖Native American Tribes ❖Upland habitat
❖Special purpose districts ❖Estuarine /marine nearshore
❖ State agencies (starting July 2002) ❖Assessments and studies
❖ Regional fisheries enhancement groups
Acquisition In- stream Diversion
q > Screening
> Fee purchase of land ➢ Conveyance
> Perpetual easements s' > By - pass of fish back to the stream
➢ Rights or claims ` ,
oldso�aetg,kt�mesrtk
III
9
• • .
ii,
.... In -stream Passage E
i , In- stream Habitat s
➢ Fish migration °""
➢ LWD
➢ S awnin
➢ Road crossings METH Mai* ' P 9 gra
9 , �i` , tuvent itit ee,IIT ➢ Wo rk below the I
➢ Barriers ',.1! ,' eww...w.a. , L�� m, „ '.
9 OHWM for fish . ,
➢ Fishways MALI USMnsen MK MEE , habitat
...” ...atiir� � i ; F enhancement , .; �.
m.
s'
o �- •, pro i: - -� ,�
Riparian Habitat
; Upland Habitat
➢Planting, removal, or ➢ Sedimentation
management a' �`� ' ➢ Fencing
➢ Livestock fencing A ➢Plant removal,
➢ Livestock water' t _ control, and
supply s management
y i s
•
Ai
`y
Estuarine /Marine Nearshore Assessments & Studies .: i s 4
➢ Dike breaching ➢ Barrier inventories`', I'
➢ Bulkhead removal ➢ Feasibility studies '' ' "--
➢ Tide channel reconstruction ➢ Landslide hazard ',:`
➢ Landowner willingness ,_ ... ;"
z
➢ Prelim & final design
t
,
,. ' •
•
•
10
r
f
• •
•
Technical assistance is available from:
❖Lead Entity technical committees Projects are evaluated on the:
❖
•
WA Department of Fish & Wildlife
❖Tribal fish biologists
Limiting Factors Analysis • Benefit to salmon
4•Other published habitat assessments 0
• Certainty of success
• Cost effectiveness
4 Round SRFB Technical Panel Technical Panel meets with lead entities
❖Kate Terrell, USFWS ' � •.0M011"" �..•••••„•,.
Steve Toth, consultant �+�'" .,..•- _,,,,,..
•:• Kevin Bauersfeld, consultant
• .:.Stephen Riley, NOAA Fsiheries ,
❖Carol Smith, Conservation Commission
❖Jeanette Smith, consultant
❖ Jeff Dillon, Corps of Engineers
m Pat Klavas, WDFW _
•:- Rod Sakrison, Dept. of Ecology — of
• Scott Nicholai, Yakama Tribe
...to learn about: 26 Lead Entities will:
:• Each lead entity's watershed
❖The project identification process ❖Visit with the Panel: late '03 — early '04
❖Submit project lists to SRFB: mid '04
...and to provide guidance on:
•• The lead entity's draft strategy ❖Present project lists to Panel: late '04
• How proposed projects meet the strategy
4
III
11
• •
•
Then, the Technical Panel will: And the SRFB will:
❖Ensure that the lead entity process has evaluated Award funding in an open public meeting
project design & cost- effectiveness
•:•Not judge projects based on design details ► • „„,.
arl
❖ Not reorder the project list „ Q
:Document their reasons • =1
41/4 ❖Recommend funding to SRFB /
How to contact us:
IAC/ Salmon Recovery Funding Board
1111 Washington Street SE
P.O. Box 40917
Olympia, Washington 98504 -0917 •
(360) 902 -2636
info @iac.wa.gov
www.waaov /iac.wagov
e. t ; 1498 -1 S59 E K. f(Peiuv
Ill
•
12
Youth Sports Facilities Grants Page 1 of 2
King t o Nome News Services ''Comment Sear=ed
OUth 6 r *rams Trails &sills R o %Programs Volunteer tlentStles
fitit
igKo PIA
1
, .' ;,��..:� '... ":�" ' . � A�4 ; « .,, A
Application Overview
Packet Download The Youth Sport Facility Grant Fund
(YSFG) provides matching grant funding to
ii! rehabilitate, expand, or develop sports fields
Application Form 9ranlP.pp and facilities serving youth in King County. To
be eligible for funding, Youth Sports and
Application Schedule -2003 ( Con'mrnunity Organizations must have
Applications Available Year Round established a partnership with a public entity
(And Online) on whose land the field or facility is located.
Applications Due June 13, 2003 Public entities include: school districts, park
Application Evaluations July- August I districts, utility districts and cities. Both the
2003 youth sport organization or community group
Executive September and the public entity submit the application.
Recommendations 2003
Made
• King County Council l Successful YSFG projects need good
Final Funding Decision November 2003
I The and cooperation between parties.
Authorization to Jan. 2004 I he ability to derllonstrate cornrhui - lity deed
t'roceod: , and impact of the project, strong partnerships,
and the ability to manage and complete the
Program Manager project in a timely fashion within budget are
206 263 - 6267 key elements of a strong application. Please
carefully read all policies and application
materials before you begin filling out the
application.
Thank you for your interost in working to
create positive activities for the youtl of I:irlg
County.
Please note: funds sari only be awarded to
organizations of King County, Washington.
10P
•
For questions about information on this page, Related Information:
http: / /www.mctrokc.gov /parks /ysports /ysports.htm 1 2/29/2003
• •
•
•
•