Council PKT 10-05-2010 RegularCITY OF
� Federal Way
AGENDA
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
Council Chambers - City Hall
October 5, 2010
7:00 p.m.
www.cityoffe�€eralwa .�com
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PRESENTATIONS
a. King County Proposition No. 1 Sales and Use Tax for Criminal Justice, Fire Protection,
and Other Government Purposes
b. Proclamation: National DECA Week — October 11-15. ...page 3
c. Certificates of Appointment: Planning Commission
d. Arts Alive Juried Art Show Winners
e. Mayors Day of Concern for the Hungry Wrap Up Report
f. City Manager Emerging Issues / Introduction of New Employees
• Sound Transit 2011 Proposed Budget Presentation
• Animal Services Update
4. CITIZEN COMMENT
PLEASE COMPLETE A PINK SLIP & PRESENT IT TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING.
When recognized by the Mayor, come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.
PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO THREE (3) MINUTES. The Mayor may interrupt comments
that exceed three minutes, relate negatively to other individuals, or are otherwise inappropriate.
5. CONSENT AGENDA
Items lisfed below have been previously reviewed in their enfirety by a Council Committee of three members and
brought before full Council for approval; all items are enacted by one motion. Individual items may be removed by
a Councilmember for separate discussion and subsequent motion.
a. Minutes: September 21, 2010 Special and Regular Meeting...page 4
b. Monthly Financial Report...paye �2
C. VouChefs...page 27
d. Federal Lobbyist Contract Extension...page ss
e. State Lobbyist Contract Extension...page s�
f. CB 550 Criminal Code Update — Lewd Conduct...page ��2
g. ILA with WSDOT for Fiber Optic Installation...page ���
h. 2010 Asphalt Overlay Project — Project Acceptance...paye � 2s
The Council may add items and take action on items not listed on the agenda.
6. COUNCIL BUSINESS
a. Commission Appointments: Arts Commission ...page �3�
b. Committee Appointments: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee ...page 732
c. 2011/2012 Human Services General Fund Recommendations ...page 133
7. INTRODUCTION / FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
a. CB 551 2010 Comprehensive Ptan Amendments...paqe �57
An ordinance of the City Of Federal Way, Washington, relating to amendments to the City's
comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan man, and zoning map
b. CB 552 Amendments to FW RC — Submittal Requirements for Plats and Commercial
PrOleCts...page 192
An ordinance of the City Of Federal Way, Washington, relating to submittal requirements for plats and
commercial projects; amending FWRC 18.30.030. FWRC 18.35.050 and FWRC 19.15.040
c. CB 553 Amendments to FWRC — Clarifyinq Complete Application and Review
Standards and Housekeepinq Amendments...page 2s7
An ordinance of the City Of Federal Way, Washington, relating to clarifying the complete application
and review standards of the zoning and development code amending FWRC 19.15.045 and FWRC
19.15.030
d. CB 554 Residential Off-Street Parkinq...page 3�s
An ordinance of the City Of Federal Way, Washington, relating to residential off-street parking;
amending FWRC 19.05.140; amending FWRC 19.130 Article Vll; and repealing FWRC 19.130.230.
e. CB 555 Speed Limit — Milton Road South between South 369 and 376� ...page 344
An ordinance of the City Of Federal Way, Washington, relating to speed limits; amending FRWC
8.030.040
8. COUNCIL REPORTS
9. CITY MANAGER REPORT
10. EXECUTIVE SESSION
• Collective Bargaining pursuant to RCW 42.30.140(4)(b)
• Property Acquisition pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(b)
11. ADJOURNMENT
The Council may add items and take action on items not listed on the agenda.
..; �::
�'�:%•:
� CITY OF
� Federal Way
PROCLAMA TION
"NATIONAL DECA WEEK"
WHEREAS, the Decatur High School DECA chapter will be celebrating "National
DECA Week" during the week of October 12� -l� 20t0; and
WHEREAS, DECA is a National Association of Marketing Education students,
providing teachers and members with educational and leadership development activities
to merge with the education classroom instructional program; and
WHEREAS, although DECA consists primarily of students in marketing programs,
membership also extends to alumni, to professionals in marketing education, and to
marketing teacher education, by working hand-in-hand with the education and business
communities; and
WHEREAS, DECA's goal is for its student members to develop a"career success kit° to
carry into their business and personal lives after graduation, and to accomplish this
DECA utilizes on-the job experience, chapter projects and a program of competency-
based competitive events in specific marketing occupational areas;
NOW, THEREFORE, �ve, the undersigned Councilmembers of the City of Federal
Way, Washington, do hereby proclaim the �veek of October l lth — 15�h as "NATIONAL
DECA WEEK" in the City of Federal Way, and do hereby encourage businesses and
citizens to encourage the development of student leadership, to promote an appreciation
for our free enterprise system, and to develop an a�vareness foc the importance ofgood
citizenship.
SIGNED this 5rh day of October, 2010.
CITY OF FEDERAL WA Y
Linda Kochmar, Mayor Dini Duclos, Deputy Mayor
'�
'.:��:
I ��::;,
Jeanne Burbidge, Cour�cilmember
Roger Freeman, Councilmember
Jack Dovey, Councilmember
.Iim Ferrell, Councilmember
Mike Park, Councilmember
.:;;: `. �;;•;•:i;�;;<;;:r.; . �;�.>:� 7,� ,::::;,;; ,, .; � ,.;;;� . . „ ;.; . .. . ,
i:�': ''i:::'•''�'::i�::�� •�•:�%i,i:'11`t:i�::'.•' �:; �'::���i..�',�`��,� i� � �� ,,•;`.'. ,':':
.�.i..-- '_'-' �.i.�.._ ,..._"_.. : � . -: � �,'�.
��•' '' ' ` � ' ::::' .��:: ` •. :���i ♦��
':.�P. ,.p, .. ,i�i�.,_ ... '.
.•• ' ��
"'v'�!�' _"•..... �����: ����: � . � . .
_.. ...... _.!���: •4ii!._ '�.�.`• •::i:._ ... �.?�.• .:�:�. '�.!i:..•♦
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 5, 2010 ITEM #: Sa
............................................................................._......................_..... .....
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
POLICY QUESTION Should the City Council approve the draft minutes of the September 21, 2010 Special and
Regular Meetings?
COMMITTEE N/A
CATEGORY:
� Consent
❑ City Council Business
❑ Ordinance
❑ Resolution
MEETING DATE: N/f1
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY: Carol McNeilly City Clerk DEPT Human Resources
_ ..................... ._..._........._ _......................._........._.................................................._..___..._..........._........._................._...................._..................................................................................... _................................._..._............_........._........._............_.....__.........._..._...._.............__...................
Attachments:
Draft meeting minutes from the September 21, 2010 Special and Regular Meetings.
Options Considered:
1. Approve the minutes as presented.
2. Amend the minutes as necessary.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving the minutes as presented.
CITY CLERK APPROVAL: N/fl � DIRECTOR APPROVAL N/A N/�1
Committee Council Committee Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/�1
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I MOVE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED".
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY C1TY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1 reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinnnces only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION #
� �Federal Way
MINUTES
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers - City Hall
SPECIAL MEETING
September 21, 2010 - 5:00 P.M.
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor Kochmar called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Linda Kochmar, Deputy Mayor Dini Duclos, Councilmembers Mike
Park, Jeanne Burbidge, Jack Dovey and Jim Ferrell.
Councilmember Roger Freeman arrived at 5:07 p.m.
Staff present: City Manager/Police Chief Brian Wilson, Assistant City Attorney Amy Jo Pearsall
and City Clerk Carol McNeilly.
2. EXECUTIVE SESSION
The Council adjourned to executive session at 5:00 p.m. for approximately one hour to discuss the
following items:
a. Sale of Property Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(c)
b. Property Acquisition Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(b)
c. Potential Litigation pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)
d. Collective Bargaining pursuant to RCW 42.30.140(4)(b)
The City Council recessed from executive session at 6:03 p.m. and announced they would be
returning to executive session at 6:30 p.m.
3. RECEPTION FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT ROB NEU
The City Council hosted a reception for Federal Way School District Superintendent Rob Neu from
6:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.
The Council adjourned to executive session at 6:30 p.m. for approximately thirty minutes to discuss
the following items:
a Sale of Property Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(c)
b. Property Acquisition Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(b)
c. Potential Litigation pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)
d. Collective Bargaining pursuant to RCW 42.30.140(4)(b)
The Council adjourned from executive session at 6:50 p.m.
4. ADJOURN
City Council Minutes — September 21, 2010 Special Meeting Page 1 of 2
Mayor Kochmar adjourned the Federal Way City Council Special Meeting at 6:50 p.m.
Attest:
Carol McNeilly, CMC, City Clerk
Approved by Council on:
City Council Minutes — September 21, 2010 Special Meeting Page 2 of 2
CITY OF
,� Federal Way
MINUTES
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers - City Hall
Regular Meeting
September 21, 2010 - 7:00 p.m.
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor Kochmar called the Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Linda Kochmar, Deputy Mayor Dini Duclos, Councilmembers Mike
Park, Roger Freeman, Jeanne Burbidge, Jack Dovey and Jim Ferrell.
Staff present: City Manager/Police Chief Brian Wilson, Assistant City Attorney Amy Jo Pearsall
and City Clerk Carol McNeilly.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Federal Way School Board Vice President Angela Griffin led the pledge of allegiance.
3. PRESENTATIONS
a. Prosecutor Dan Satterberq: Update on Kinq County Budqet Cuts and impacts to local
�urisdictions
King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg stated King County is facing tough decisions regarding
funding programs in the upcoming budget. Over the past two-years, they have cut $140 million
from the budget, and they are looking to cut approximately $60 million dollars in funding in 2011
and an additionat $20 million in 2012. Mr. Satterberg reviewed the impacts of King County
Proposition 1 and stated revenues from this Proposition will go towards criminal justice and
safety services as well as a new juvenile jail. If the proposition is not approved it will impact the
rate for trial processes and staffing levels at the prosecutor's office will be reduced.
b. Federal Wav Public School District Superintendent Rob Neu
Superintendent Rob Neu thanked the Council for hosting a reception earlier this evening. He
stated the school district is thriving and he is looking forward to working with the Council in the
future.
c. Proclamation: National Preparedness Month
Councilmember Burbidge read the proclamation into the record and presented it to the City's
Director of Parks/Public Works/Emergency Management Cary Roe. Mr. Roe thanked the Council
for recognizing the importance of the National Preparedness Month.
d. Citv Manaqer Emerqinq Issues / Introduction of New Employees
City Manager/Police Chief Wilson reported there were no introductions of new employees.
Mr. Wilson welcomed Superintendent Mr. Neu to Federal Way. He reported the Council has a
presentation on King County Proposition scheduled for October 5, 2010 where both the Pro and
City Council Minutes — September 21, 2010 Regular Meeting Page 1 of 5
Con Committees have been invited to speak on the issue.
4. CITIZEN COMMENT
Nancv Combs, spoke in opposition to a bikini barista business in Federal Way. She also stated
the City does not need red-light photo cameras; it needs Police officers on the street.
Reverend Marvin Eckfeldt, spoke regarding agenda item 6.a. Human Services funding,
specifically the King County Sexual Assault Resource Center. He encouraged the Council to
fund the full $30,000 they are requesting.
Kevin Kinq spoke regarding agenda item 6.a. Human Services funding. He encouraged the
Council to fund the full amount that the Reach-Out Organization is requesting. Mr. King
distributed a handout to the Council that documented the number of homeless men their
organization has served over the past few years.
Bob Wroblewski Chair of the Human Services Commission thanked the Council for the Human
Services funding. He noted the Commission had double the number of applications this year
versus in the past. He hopes the Council can support the Commissions recommendations that
are before them this evening.
Betty Tavlor thanked the Council for the street lights at the Waterbury Apartments. She noted
there have been raccoons around her apartment complex and she is asking the City for some
assistance.
Donald Barovic feels the city should not have red-light photo program. He also fears there may
be a coyote attack on a child in the City. He was pleased to report that young fish have been
sighted in the creek on his properly.
Clara McArthur spoke regarding a public notice in the Federal Way Mirror regarding pedestrian
safety improvements at Steel Lake Park.
Norma Blanchard asked for clarification on an article in the Federal Way Mirror on the Twin
Development Project. She also stated her Public Records Requests are for her information only,
not for a political candidate.
Pat Hiqqins spoke regarding agenda item 5.b. She would like to see more speed studies done
on Milton Road South before the Council passes the ordinance on tonight's agenda.
Martin Moore, stated this month marks the 20 Anniversary for the Americans with Disabilities Act.
He would like to see children with disabilities have access to playground equipment in Federal Way
Parks.
H. David Kaplan, submitted a letter for the City Clerk to read into the record regarding the
Tourism Enhancement Grant submission deadlines.
5. CONSENT AGENDA
a. Minutes: September 7, 2010 Special and Regular Meetings -Approved
� . .
- - _-- -- - - ' - — ' - � i�
c. CB 549 Update the Federal Way Revised Code to Reflect the Change in Government to Mayor-
Council Approved Ordinance 10-669
City Council Minutes — September 21, 2010 Regular Meeting Page 2 of 5
d. Purchase of BearCat Armored Vehicle for Valley Swat with $22,400 in VNET State Seizure
Funds-Approved
e. Valley Special Weapons and Tactics Team (SWAT) -Approved
f. Proposed S 332nd Street Alignment, Detention Pond Location and Relocated Celebration Park
Driveway -Approved
g. T-Mobile Site Lease Renewal - Lakota Park -Approved
Councilmember Freeman pulled item 5.b. CB 547 Speed Limits — Proposed Changes
MOTION: Deputy Mayor Duclos moved approval of items 5a, 5c, 5d, 5e, 5f, and 5g.
Councilmember Burbidge second.
VOTE: Motion carried 7-0.
Consent Item 5(b)/ CB 547 Speed Limits — Proposed Chanqes
Traffic Engineer Rick Perez stated staff conducted traffic studies and considered the request to
reduce the speed limit from 35 mph to 25 mph. However staff recommends maintaining the posted
speed limit at 35 mph. Mr. Perez noted that only 4 collisions have been reported on that road in the
past 5 years.
MOTION: Councilmember Freeman moved approval of the proposed ordinance amending
FWRC 8.3.040, but postpone the portion dealing with Milton Road South between S. 369
and S. 376 the October 5, 2010 Council Meeting. Councilmember povey second.
VOTE: Motion carried 7-0. Ordinance 10-668.
6. COUNCIL BUSINESS
a. 2011-12 Human Services Commission Fundinq Public Services Recommendations and 2011
CDBG Capital Fundinq Recommendations
Human Services Grant Manager Kolya McCleave stated every two-years the Human Services
Commission is charged with allocating the Human Services General Fund dollars as well as the
Community Development Block Grant dollars. Funds awarded in 2010 will be expended in 2011
and 2012. The City has budgeted $430,000 in Human Services General Funds and preliminary
estimates of $81,607 in Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) for Public Service;
$310,117 for CDBG Capital; and $81,607 for CDBG Planning and Administration , contingency
plan, and conditions of funding, as presented. The Council asked clarifying questions of staff on
the funding recommendations.
MOTION: Councilmember Park moved approval of the 2011/2012 CDBG Funding
recommendations, and postpone the 2011/2012 Human Services General Fund
recommendations to the October 5, 2010 Council Meeting. Councilmember povey second.
VOTE: Motion carried 5-0. Deputy Mayor Duclos and Councilmember Burbidge recused.
The Council would like to staff to return with additional information including which new programs
are being recommended, which programs funded in the past are being reduced and review the
FUSION application. This item will be scheduled for the October 5, 2010 City Councit meeting.
b. Status Update on Twin Development Proiect
City Manager/Police Chief Wilson stated on September 30, 2010 the City authorized the transfer
of the Purchase and Sale Agreement from United Properties to Twin Development. Both United
City Council Minutes — September 21, 201 D Regular Meeting Page 3 of 5
Properties and Twin Development are requesting to extend the closing date of the Purchase and
Sale Agreement to March 31, 2011 to allow Twin Development time to obtain financing. Twin
Development has agreed to deposit $100,000 into an escrow account by December 31, 2010,
that will go towards the purchase price or be forfeited to the City if the closing does not occur by
March 31, 2011. Steve Smith, a representative from Twin Development spoke regarding their
marketing and investment efforts. The Council asked clarifying questions of Mr. Smith. Patrick
Doherty, Economic Development Director, reviewed the proposed amendment to the purchase
and sale agreement. The Council asked Twin Development to share their marketing plan/timeline
with the Council.
MOTION: Councilmember Park moved to table this item until a Special Council Meeting on
September 28, 2010. Councilmember Ferrell second.
Councilmember Ferrell withdrew his second.
VOTE: Motion died for lack of second.
MOTION: Councilmember povey moved to approve the proposed seventh amendment,
granting an extension of Agreements closing date to 3/3/2011 and requiring an additional
escrow payment be made by 1/31/2011, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the
same on or before 9/30/2010. Councilmember Freeman second.
VOTE: Motion carried 4-3 Councilmembers Ferrell, Park and Deputy Mayor Duclos
dissenting.
MOTION: Councilmember povey moved to suspend the Council rules and extend the
meeting past 10:00 p.m. Councilmember Burbidge second.
VOTE: Motion carried 7-0.
RECESS: The Council recessed from 9:53 p.m. to 10:03 p.m.
c. Commission Appointments: Planninq Commission
MOTION: Deputy Mayor Duclos moved to re-appoint Hope Elder, Wayne Carlson and Tom
Medhurst to voting positions on the Planning Commission with terms expiring September
30, 2014. Councilmember povey second.
VOTE: Motion carried 7-0.
7. INTRODUCTION / FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
a. Council Bill 550: Criminal Code Update — Lewd Conduct
An Ordinance of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating the lewd conduct, amending FWRC
6.45.010, `Definitions" and adding a new section to Chapter 6.45 FWRC. "Public Morals"
City Clerk McNeilly read the ordinance title into the record.
Assistant City Attorney Amy Jo Pearsall stated this is a proactive measure, and it is based on
issues that other cities were experiencing. She stated the city has not had any complaints
regarding an espresso stand that recently opened in the City.
MOTION: Councilmember Burbidge moved to forward the ordinance to the October 5, 2010
City Council meeting second reading and enactment. Deputy Mayor Duclos second.
VOTE: Motion carried 6-1, Councilmember povey dissenting.
Ciry Council Minutes — September 21, 2010 Regular Meeting Page 4 of 5
8. COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmembers Freeman and Ferrell had no report.
Councilmember povey reported on an upcoming SCORE Meeting and encouraged everyone to
attend the Sand Sculpture Event.
Councilmember Burbidge reported on recent changes to transit services, the upcoming PRHSPS
Meeting and the production at the Knutzen Theater.
Councilmember Park reported the next FEDRAC Meeting is September 28, 2010.
Deputy Mayor Duclos reported on Solid Waste Issues and asked Council for feedback. She also
reported that Waste Management is picking up food this week from Federal Way residents as part
of the Mayors Day of Concern.
Mayor Kochmar reported on the upcoming Police / Fire Fighter Chili Cook Off. She stated the City is
hosting a Challenge Grant in conjunction with the Mayors Day of Concern and will match donations
to the Multi-Service Center dollar for dollar.
9. CITY MANAGER REPORT
Police Chief/City Manager Wilson had no report.
10. EXECUTIVE SESSION
The Council did not adjourn to executive session.
�i+ton}i�l I i�ilr�4ir�n n� �rci �.�n4 �r� �r'\Al �17 Z!1 '1'1!1/� \/�\
d. . . )
11. ADJOURN
W ith no further business before the Council, Mayor Kochmar adjourned the Federal Way City Council
Regular Meeting at 10:18 p.m.
Attest:
Carol McNeilly, CMC, City Clerk
Approved by Council:
City Council Minutes — September 21, 2010 Regular Meeting Page S of 5
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 5, 2010
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
ITEM #:
SUB.TEC'r: AUGUST 2010 MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT
POLICY QUESTION ShouZd the Council approve the August 2010 Monthly FinanciaZ Report?
COMMITTEE: Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee
CATEGORY:
� Consent
❑ City Council Business
STAFF REPORT BY: Tho K
Attachments:
❑ Ordinance
❑ Resolution
Finance Director
■ August 2010 Monthly Financial Report
Options Considered:
MEETING DATE: September 28, 2010
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
DEPT: Finance
1. Approve the August 2010 Monthly Financial Report as presented.
2. Deny approval of the August 2010 Monthly Financial Report and provide direction to staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Option 1.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ,(�.� �.n 5 ��� �� v � � � 11IRECTOR APPROVAL: � - 1 �"-�
Committee Council Committee Coancil
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward approval of the August 2010 Monthly Financial Report to the
October 5, 2010 consent agenda for approval.
�
Mike Pa�l , o mj ee Chair e nne Burbidge ,(
Member
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION "I move approval of the August 2010 Monthly Financial Report"
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1sT reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED— 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION #
Federal Wa Au ust 2010 Monthl Financial Report
y g Y
GENERAL & STREET FUND OPERATIONS
The overall operations of the combined General and Street Fund showed a negative result of $405K. Overall revenue total $28.OM
and is $140K or less than 1% above year-to-date budget of $27.8M.
2009 2010 BUDGET VS ACTUAL
ENERAL & STREET FUND Annual YTD YTD YTD Favorable (Unfavorable)
Summary of Sources & Uses Budget Actual Actual Budget Budget Actual S %
Beginning Fund Balance $ 5,642,307 $ 5,642,307 $ 5,642,307 $ 8,345,195 $ 8,345,198 $ 8,345,198 n/a n/a
PERATING REVENUES
Property Taxes 9,287,000 9,443,649 5,004,649 9,329,370 5,026,193 5,078,166 51,973 1.0%
Sales Tax 10,578,000 10,583,302 7,114,435 10,578,000 7,011,543 7,140,378 128,775 1.8%
Criminal Justice Sales Tax 1,740,000 1,743,893 1,171,349 1,740,000 1,168,735 1,123,686 (45,049) -3.9%
Intergovernmental 2,424,000 2,450,957 1,546,745 2,386,000 1,505,752 1,633,969 125,217 8.5%
Streamline Sales Tax - 3,362 - - - - - n/a
Leasehold Tax 4,000 4,999 4,010 4,000 3,209 4,209 1,000 312%
Gambling Taxes 1,110,000 1,127,203 766,497 1,110,000 771,493 434,969 (336,523) -43.6%
ourt Revenue 1,502,101 1,555,111 1,073,999 1,477,469 1,019,263 1,070,810 51,547 5.1%
Buiiding Permits/Fees-CD 1,245,000 1,248,470 907,402 1,251,000 900,001 932,641 32,640 3.6°k
ROW Permits & Develop Svcs Fees-PW 341,000 355,328 250,005 349,000 236,576 220,708 (15,868) -6.7%
Licenses 240,000 250,919 94,849 240,000 90,721 93,570 2,849 3.1%
Franchise Fees 965,000 950,213 717,699 995,000 751,527 733,091 (18,436) -2.5%
Passport Agency Fees 73,000 68,865 50,415 73,000 53,442 48,775 (4,667) -8.7%
Park & General Recreation Fees 779,000 806,278 626,781 775,000 602,466 719,086 116,620 19.4%
Police Services 761,000 789,543 459,510 761,000 442,898 490,754 47,856 10.8%
dmin/Cash Management Fees 628,424 628,887 419,324 639,755 426,571 427,073 503 0.1%
Interest Earnings 72,250 84,437 76,413 72,250 65,384 30,995 (34,389) -52.6%
Misc/Other 247,789 269,168 192,261 247,000 176,427 209,010 32,583 18.5%
n oin i a Tr nsfers in:
Celebration Park/PK M&O 344,400 344,400 344,400 361,620 361,620 361,620 - n/a
Utility Tax-Kenneth Jones Pool - - - - - - - Na
Arts Comm/RW&B Festival 113,400 113,400 113,400 119,070 119,070 119,070 - n/a
Police Positions 952,168 952,168 952,168 1,002,862 1,002,862 1,002,862 - n/a
Street Bond/Lights 459,486 459,486 459,486 482,461 482,462 452,462 - n/a
General Fund Operations 4,632,152 4,632,152 3,015,500 4,126,652 2,900,000 2,900,000 -� n/a
Prop 1 Voter Package 3,399,168 3,318,163 2,351,779 3,396,049 2,204,355 2,204,355 - n/a
n oin raffic afe Tr s In:
Court/Police/Traffic 830,000 830,000 580,000 830,000 500,000 500,000 - n/a
otal Operating Revenues 42,728,338 43,014,352'' 28,293,075 42,346,558 27,822,568 27,962,198 139,630 0.3%
PERATING EXPENDITURES
City Council 436,493 436,859 331,448 432,645 345,993 344,742 1,250 0.4%
City Manager 1,844,694 1,762,952 1,275,436 1,604,325 1,160,674 896,518 264,157 22.8%
Municipal Court 1,505,133 1,660,809 954,451 1,488,253 959,975 953,389 6,587 p_7%
Economic Development 488,961 354,993 176,708 404,921 201,561 146,571 54,991 27.3%
Human Resources 1,027,476 951,290 607,685 1,148,879 748,181 571,922 176,259 23.6%
Finance 970,847 898,863 622,885 979,647 659,853 642,133 17,721 2.7%
Civii/Criminal Legal Services 1,550,762 1,433,805 980,771 1,546,079 1,036,081 930,702 105,379 10.2%
Comm. Development Svcs 4,067,399 3,770,864 2,414,718 3,786,427 2,491,548 2,336,617 154,930 6.2%
ail Services 2,092,463 2,043,125 1,092,493 2,368,041 1,300,959 1,477,897 (176,938) -13.6%
Police Services 23,249,152 22,408,255 14,696,743 22,359,965 14,841,941 14,820,159 21,782 p.�%
Parks and Recreation 3,875,775 3,842,171 2,499,732 3,897,787 2,568,513 2,574,886 (6,373) -0.2%
Public Works 4,889,570 4,307,345 2,783,378 4,691,158 3,031,396 2,671,865 359,531 11.9%
1-time Savings/Unalloc IS Charges (818,106) (188,106) - 365,723 - - n/a
otal Operating Expenditures 45,180,619 43,683,224 28,436,451 45,073,850 29,346,675 28,367,403 979,274 2.2%
perating Revenues over/(under)
Operating Expenditures (2,452,281) (668,872) (143,376) (2,727,292) (1,524,107) (405,204) 1,118,904 -167.3%
THER FINANCING SOURCES
One-Time Transfers In\Grant\Other 3,697,556 3,307,192 2,085,757 741,735 519,946 519,946 - 0.0%
Intertund Loan Proceeds 65,000 65,000 65,000 - - - - 0.0%
Total Other Financing Sources 3,762,556 3,372,193 2,150,757 741,735 519,946 579,946 (1) 0.0%
OTHER FINANCING USES
City Manager Contingency - - 1,200,000 - - - n/a
One-Time Transfers\Other 10,319 429 429 904,028 212,556 212,556 - 0.0%
Total Other Financing Uses 10,379 429 429 2,104,028 212,556 212,556 0.0°/,
otal Endin Fund Balance $ 6,942,263 E 8,345,198 S 7,649,257 S 4,255,609 S 7,128,481 S 8,247,387 n/a n/a
DESIGNATED OPERATING FUNDS
Designated operating funds revenue total $16.1M and is $394K below year-to-date budget of $I6.SM. Expenditures of
$14.7M is $1.4M below year-to-date budget of $16.1M.
2009 2070 BUDGET VS ACTUAL
DESIGNATED OPERATiNG FUNDS Annual YTD YTD YTD Favorable (Unfavorable)
ummary of Sources & Uses Budget Actual Actual Budget Budget Actual S °�
Begin Balance-Designated Funds $ 9,219,725 $ 9,219,725 $ 9,219,726 $ 10,004,673 $ 70,004,667 $ 10,004,667 n/a n/
OPERATING REVENUES
Intergovemmental 527,215 513,077 331,063 537,315 346,703 332,193 (14,510) �.2%
U[ilityTax 10,636,098 10,489,908 7,418,306 10,811,614 7,647,094 6,900,441 (746,652) -9.8%
UtilityTax-ProplVoterPackage 3,102,196 3,059,558 2,163,672 3,155,239 2,232,254 2,018,594 (213,659) -9.6°k
Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax 180,000 154,148 95,688 165,000 10t,259 86,088 (15,177) -15.0°�
Real Estate 6ccise Tax 1,175,000 1,428,985 972,636 900,000 635,837 989,321 353,484 55.6%
FW Community Center-Operations 7,502,093 1,494,430 1,081,351 1,552,093 1,124,730 1,145,775 21,046 1.9%
Red Light Photo Enforcement Program 830,000 851,044 606,001 830,000 591,017 970,939 379,923 64.3°k
Property Tax- KC E�ansion Levy 149,205 156,167 86,269 151,443 83,659 82,356 (1,303) -1.6%
Dumas Bay Centre 589,132 497,811 330,477 603,786 400,830 359,800 (41,029) -10.2
Knutzen Family TheaVe 54,755 54,867 54,756 - - 322 322 n/
SWM Fees 3,314,114 3,397,265 1,854,193 3,338,969 1,822,376 1,829,661 7,285 0.4%
Refuse Collection Fees 270,732 272,641 204,480 278,854 209,141 208,054 (1,086) -0.5
Interest Eamings 149,719 55,082 54,055 150,526 147,719 19,171 (128,547) -87.0°r6
Miscellaneous/Other 4,250 4,287 3,077 25,896 18,587 19,975 1,388 7.5%
n an t'I' Tax Tran f
Knutzen Family Theatre 359,863 359,863 135,723 132,232 132,232 132,232 - 0.0%
FWCC Ops/Reserves/Debt 1,781,025 1,781,025 721,576 1,817,264 506,634 506,634 - 0.0%
AAerialStreets 1,126,316 1,126,316 1,400,000 455,000 455,000 455,000 - i 0.0%
ToWI Opereting Revenues 25,751,773 25,696,474 77,815,490 24,905,231 16,455,070 76,056,558 (398,512) -1.6%
OPERATING EXPENDITURES �
City Overlay Program 2,050,407 1,940,266 1,763,320 2,133,379 1,938,821 1,438,490 500,331 25.8°
Utility Tax-Admin/Cash Mgmt Fees 62,137 62,136 41,424 64,622 43,081 43,081 1 0.0%
Solid Waste 489,233 448,872 299,160 447,016 297,923 296,500 1,422 0.5%
Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax 380,895 151,062 715,710 370,707 � 283,954 121,514 162,440 57.2%
FWCommunityCenter 2,056,859 2,057,096 1,456,436 2,110,6261 1,465,954 1,354,892 111,062 7.6°h
raffic Safety (Red Light Photo) 50,000 2,258 400 50,000 8,864 2,938 5,926 66.9 %
DebtService 1,203,385 1,133,287 338,918 1,203,505 360,007 345,389 14,618 4.1%
Surface Water Management 3,372,083 2,880,616 2,003,796 3,554,563 2,472,603 2,044,200 428,402 17.3 %
Dumas Bay Centre 646,225 588,509 385,334 641,056 419,739 357,370 62,369 14.9%
Knutzen Family Theatre 192,789 190,932 159,914 162,849 136,393 48,924 87,469 64.1 �
n oin tili TaxTr sf s ut
FWCC Ops/Reserves/Debt 1,781,025 1,781,025 721,576 1,817,264 506,634 506,634 - 0.0%
Knutzen Family Theatre 359,863 359,863 135,723 132,232 132,232 132,232 - 0.0%
Arterial Streets Overiay 1,126,316 1,126,316 1,400,000 455,000 455,000 455,000 - 0.0°
Transpatation CIP 3,700,W0 3,700,000 3,700,000 - - - ' ��
General/Street Fund Operations 6,501,606 6,501,606 4,763,139 6,092,666 4,866,014 4,866,014 - 0.0%
Prop 1 Voter Package 3,399,168 3,318,163 2,314,279 3,396,049 2,204,355 2,204,355 - 0.0%
n oin ic afet T uY
CouNPolicelTraffic 830,000 830,000 580,000 830,000 500,000 500,000 - 0.0%
ToWI Opereting Expenditures 28,201,992 27,072,008 20,179,128 23,461,834 76,091,574 14,717,534 1,374,040 5.1 k
Operating Revenues over/(under)
Opereting Expenditures (2,450,279) (1,375,534) (2,363,638) 1,443,397 363,496 1,339,024 975,529 -70.9%
�
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
Grants/Mitigation/Other/Transfer 3,879,064 4,051,159 3,911,579 1,416,972 1,345,009 1,345,009 - 0.0%
Total Other Financing Sources 3,879,064 4,057,159 2,480,483 1,416,972 7,345,009 1,345,009 0.0%
OTHER FINANCING USES
One-Time Transfers Out/Other 1,&47,743 1,825,684 1,427,503 2,841,000 2,595,288 2,595,288 - 0.0%
Interfund Loan Repayment/FWCC 65,000 65,000 65,000 - - - - n/a
ToWI Other Financing Uses 7,972,743 1,890,684 1,492,503 2,841,000 2,595,288 2,595,288 0.0%
ENDING FUND BALANCE
Arterial Street 400,000 633,380 573,971 (2) - 526,476 n/a n/
UtilityTax 1,992,461 2,131,040 1,743,200 3,457,015 - 2,534,774 n/a n/a
UtilityTax-ProplVoterPackage 1,158,186 899,580 1,007,579 899,580 - 713,821 n!a n/
Solid Waste 8 Recycling 92,817 151,639 125,899 103,805 - 165,379 n/a n/
Hotei/MotelLodgingTax - 201,347 178,177 (1) - 171,269 n/a n/a
FW Community Center 247,911 240,011 (53,195) 669,356 - 325,921 n/a n/
Tr�c Safety Fund 85,819 155,288 27,365 105,287 - 624,387 n/a n/
Paths & Trails 127,115 133,511 60,777 132,769 - 60,079 n/a n/
DebtSeniceFund 3,884,320 4,164,480 3,144,180 2,905,708 - 3,781,999 n/a n/
Surface Water Management 535,815 1,114,705 435,637 1,638,720 - 1,523,570 n/a n/a
Dumas Bay Centre Operations 182,676 149,071 (222,634) 111,805 - 151,504 n/a n/
Knutzen Family Theatre 28,648 30,616 69,068 (1) - 114,246 n/a n/
TotalEndin Fund Balance $ 8,735,767 $ 10,004,667 $ 7,090,224 $ 10,024,041 $ $ 10,093,425 Na n/a
Sales Tax
Compared to year-to-date 2009 actual, sales tax revenues are up $26K or less than 1%. August sales tax collection of $lAM is
$77K or 83% above 2009's August sales tax of $930K. Compared to 2010 year-to-date budget, sales tax revenues are up $129K ar
1.8%. There is an overall increase in all areas with the exception of Retail Trade, Trans/LTtility, Manufacturing, and Fin/Ins/Real
Estate.
LOCAL RETAfL SALES TAX REVENUES
Year-tadate thru August
2009 2010 Change from 2009 2010 Actual vs Budget
Month Actual Budget Actual $ % S �
Jan $ 854,156 $ 829,190 $ 824,040 $ (30,116) -3.5% $ (5,150) -0.6%
Feb 1,207,836 1,155,376 1,171,625 (36,211) -3.0% 16,249 1.3%
Mar 816,547 770,110 786,688 (29,859) -3.7% 16,578 2.0%
Apr 800,565 761,718 837,813 37,249 4.7% 76,095 9.5%
May 874,919 903,200 887,167 12,248 1.4% (16,033) -1.8%
Jun 800,518 802,507 790,522 (9,995) -1.2% (11,985) -1.5%
Jul 829,441 819,688 834,924 5,483 0.7% 15,235 1.8%
Aug 930,454 969,754 1,007,538 77,084 8.3% 37,784 4.1%
Sep 916,206 919,103 - - - - -
Oct 879,431 890,241 - - - - -
Nov 886,309 929,316 - - - - -
Dec 786,921 827,796 - - - - -
YTD Tot81 $ 7,114,435 $ 7,011,543 $ 7,140,318 $ 25,884 0.4% $ 128,775 1.8%
nnua ota $ 10,583,302 $ 10,578,000 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Sales Tczx by SIC Group
Overall, there is a decrease of $121K in Retail Trade and $68K in Manufacturing offset by $78K increase in Services, $SSK in
Construction, $45K in Information, and $44K in Government. In government, the increase of $44K is mostly due to
Nonclassifiable establishments, which includes establishments that did not identify their component group (i.e.
Retail/Services/Construction/wholesaling etc) when filing sales tax with the State.
The unfavorable variance in retail trade is due to a decrease of $43K in clothing & accessories, $41K in misc. store retailers and the
unfavorable variance in manufacturing is due to a decrease of $57K in wood product manufacturing.
COMPARISON OF SALES TAX COLLECTIONS BY SIC GROUP
Year-to-date thru August
Component Component comprised of the 2009 2010 Change from 2009
Group following major categories: Actual Actual $ %
General merchandise stores, motor vehicle & parks
dealer, building material/garden, and misc. store
Retail Trade retailers $ 3,926,786 $ 3,805,975 $ (120,810) -3.1%
Food services/drinking places, professional,
Services scientific, tech, and repair/maintenance 1,561,216 1,638,878 77,662 5.0%
Construction of buildings and specialty trade
Construct contractors 552,150 607,200 55,050 10.0%
Wholesale of durable goods and non durable
Wholesaling goods. 283,742 290,536 6,793 2.4°/a
Transp/Utility Utilities 4,014 2,646 (1,369) -34.1%
Telecommunications, publishing and motion
Information picture/sound record 348,375 393,402 45,028 12.9%
Wood produd manufacturing, printing/related
Manufacturing suppoR, and fumiture related produds 167,221 99,704 (67,517) -40.4%
Economic Programs, Executive/Legislative,
Justice/Public Order, Human Resources
Administration, NonGassificable Establishments
which includes Liquor Stores and sales tax for
establishments that did not classify their
Govemment Component group. 73,152 116,852 43,700 59.7°/a
RentalAeasing services, real estate, and credit
Fin/Ins/Real Estate intermediation. 184,954 160,057 (24,897) -13.5%
Mining, support activities of mining, and
Other transportation services. 12,824 25,066 12,243 95.5%
Year-to-date Total $ 7,714,435 $ 7,140,378 $ 25,884 0.4%
Sales Tax bv Area
Comparing year-to-date 2010 to year-to-date 2009:
2010 SALES TAX BY AREA
% of Total The
Commons
9.3% S 348th
„ ',� _ � 10.4%
Other
s�.7°io
S
312th/S316th
8.5%
Pavilion
Center
5.2%
FW
Crossings Hotel/Motel
3.7% 1.2%
■ S 348�': Down $64K or 7.9% due to a decrease of $49K in Retail
AppareUAccessories and $15K in Retail Electronics &
Appliances offset by an increase of $6K in Retail General
Merchandise.
■ The Commons: Down $32K or 4.6% mainly due to a decrease
of $24K in General Retail Merchandise.
SALES TAX COMPARISON by AREA
Year•tadate August
Chg from 2009
Group 2009 2010 $ °h
Total Sales Tax 57,114,435 $7,140,318 $25,884 0.4%
S 348th Retail Block $803,003 $739,206 (363,798) •7.9°�
% chg from prev yr -15.6% -7.9% na na
The Commons 699,330 667,043 (532,287) -4.6°�
% chg from prev yr -5.6% -4.6% na na
S 312th to S 316th 615,227 605,122 (510,106) •1.6°h
% chg from prev yr 1.6% -1.6% na na
Pavilion Center 352,937 373,890 $20,953 5.9°h
% chg from prev yr -3.6% 5.9% na na
Fbtels&Motels 90,351 83,137 (7,214) -8.0°�
% chg from prev yr -26.3% -8.0% na na
FWCrossings 279,478 266,710 (11,768) -4.6%
% chg hom prev yr 61.9% -4.6% na na
■ S312 to S.16 Down $lOK or 1.6% mainly due to decrease of $SK in Retail Food Stores.
■ Pavilion Center: Up $21K or 5.9% mainly due to an increase of $23K in Electronics & Appliances offset by a decrease of $3K
in Misc Retail Trade.
■ Hotel & Motels: Down $7K or 8.0% due to one major hotel's decrease activity.
■ Federal Way Crossings: Down $13K or 4.6% due to a decrease of $19K Retail Misc Store offset by an increase of $3K in
Furniture and Fixtures.
i7tility Tax (Total 7.75%) �
Total utility taxes received year-to-date 2010 is $8.9M and is below year-to-date 2009's collections by $663K or 6.9%. Of the
$663K decrease, $426K is due to a decrease in overall revenues for a major gas vendor. Compared to budget, net utilities tax
revenues are below 2010 year-to-date projections by $960K or 9.7%. The utility tax rebate is a reimbursement from the City to any
residents of Federal Way who is 65 years of age or older, disabled/unable to work, and had an income during the calendar year.
Any payments that these qualified individuals made towards the utility tax that is passed from the utility company to the consumer
is reimbursed by the City. 154 rebates totaling $20K have been processed for the year.
UTILITY TAXES
Year-to-date fhru August
2009 2010 Chan from 2009 2010 Actual vs Budget
Month Actua/ Bud et Actual $ Var % Var $ Var % Var
Jan $ 1,239,336 $ 1,276,825 $ 1,259,004 $ 19,667 1.6% $ (17,821) -1.4°/
Feb 1,444,481 1,488,174 1,227,306 (217,175) -15.0% (260,868) -17.5°/
Mar 1,382,427 1,424,244 1,162,917 (219,511) -15.9% (261,327) -18.3°/
Apr 1,364,444 1,261,215 1,210,765 (153,679) -11.3% (50,449) -4.0°/
May 1,190,557 1,371,072 1,119,347 (71,210) -6.0% (251,725) -18.4°/
Jurl 1,024,160 1,055,139 1,043,015 18,855 1.8% (12,125) -1.1°/
Jul 1,010,788 1,041,363 980,878 (29,910) -3.0% (60,485) -5.8°/
Aug 939,252 967,663 936,258 (2,994) -0.3% (31,406) -3.2°/
Sep 914,835 942,508 - - - - -
Oct 1,028,231 1,059,334 - - - - -
Nov 987,442 1,017,311 - - - - -
Dec 1,036,986 1,068,353 - - - - -
YTD Total $ 9,595,446 $ 9,885,695 $ 8,939,489 $ (655,956) -6.8% $ (946,206) -9.6°/
YTD Rebate (13,468) (6,348) (20,453) (6,986) 51.9% (14,105) 222.2°/
Annual Total $ 13,549,472 $ 13,966,853 $ 8,919,036 $ (662,942) -6.9% (960,312) -9.7°/
Compared to 2009 -
■ Electricity is down by $72K or 2.2%. UT/�ITYTAXES
■ Gas is down by $433K or 24.8% mainly due to Year-to-date thru August
decrease in natural gas rates effective October 2009 2010 Change from 2009
2009 and decrease in consumption due to warmer Actual ,4ctual $ Var % Var
weather when compared to 1 Quarter 2009. Bectric $ 3,355,523 $ 3,283,052 $ (72,471) -2.2%
G2s 1,750,876 1,317,397 (433,479) -24.8%
■ Solid Waste is up by $25K or 5.0%. Starting Solid Waste 491,882 516,498 24,616 5.0%
March 1 there was an average of a 17% increase �ble 920 ,692 942,860 22,168 2.4%
in solid waste service rates. Comparing March
2009 to March 2010, there was a 14% increase in �one 818,151 795,489 (22,662) - 2.8%
solid waste utility tax offset by decrease of 2% in �Ilular 2,112,440 1,939,808 (172,632) - 8.2%
the beginning of 2010 compared to 2009. �9er 1,356 1,107 (248) - 18.3%
SWNA 144,526 143,278 (1,248) -0.9%
■ Cable is up $22K or 2.4%. Tax Rebate (13,468) (20,453) (6,986) 51.9%
■ Phone is down $23K or 2.8%. YTD Total $ 9,581,978 $ 8,919,036 $(662,942) -6.9%
■ Cellular phone is down by $173K or 8.2%. Of the $173K decrease, $70K is due to an audit of a major payor for back taxes
between 1998-2009. When this is taken into consideration, cell phone is down $103K or 5.0% which is due to recession and
bundling of services. In addition, Voice over IP and prepaid ceil phone cards are not taxed a utility tax.
Update on Proposition 1
Year-to-date 2010 prop 1 expenditures total $1.9M or 61.5% of the $3.1M budget. An additionai $300K was transferred for Police
Overtime. Current life-to-date Prop 1 Utility tax collections total $10.5M and expenditures total $9.8M resulting in ending fund
balance of $714K.
2009 2010
PROP 1 Annual Annuai Annual YTD LIFE
Budget Actual Budget Actual TO DATE
Beginning Balance: $ 1,158,186 $ 1,158,186 $ 899,580 $ 899,580 $ -
OPERATING REVENUES
January $ 277,578 $ 279,745 $ 288,315 $ 284,291 $ 836,176
February 291,008 299,981 336,039 277,134 862,421
March 339,134 337,484 321,603 262,594 1,161,007
April 265,287 275,585 284,790 273,399 1,085,520
May 307,326 300,363 309,597 252,756 1,093,355
June 237,543 230,272 238,257 235,519 913,321
.I��I� 229,141 228,153 235,146 221,489 886,664
October
November
December
Total Utility Tax for Prop 1
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
Public Safety Improvement Positions & Costs:
Police Services (includes sworn postions, records clerk, and
indirect Information Technology support costs)
Court Services (includes Judge, Court Clerk, Prosecutor, public
defender contract, and indirect Information Technology support;
Tntal Puhlic Safetv Imorovement Pnsitions & Costs
Code Enforcement Officer
Code Enforcement Civil A1
Park Maintenance
Total Commu�ity Safety'
Indirect Support - HR Anal
Other Transfer - Prop 1 OT for Police
Subtotal Qther Expenditures
Total Proo 1 Exaenditures
256,237
212,089 218,505 211,413 849,205
206,576 212,824 - 635,453
232,181 239,204 - 682,747
222,971 229,715 - 679,588
234,158 241,241 - 837,967
384,409 2,319,335 2,340,772 1,445,191 6,764
366,119 349,074 383,866 236,383 1,180
750,528 2,668,410 2,724,638 ' 1,681;574 '7,945
93,155 87,683 100,218 57,760 292
69,962 64,141 72,589 35,778 210
107,562 100,806 112,046 64,449 333
59,553 58,428 39,784
3,121,227 3,018,165 3,096,049
- 300,000 300,000
- 300,000 ' ' 3Q0,000
3,721,227 3;318,165' 3,396,049
$ 1,139.155 E 899,580, � 658,770
27,292 1
37,500
�04,353 9,Q
- 1
Real Estate Excise Tax
Compared to year-to-date 2009 actuals,
collections are up $17K or 1.7%. August's
receipt of $60K is $23K below August 2009's
actuals and $4K below August 2010's
projections. Compared to year-to-date 2010
budget, coilections are up $354K or 55.6%.
There was 1 major transaction in August
which was a sale of waterfront property
located at 39�' Place SW for $1.1M.
August 2010 activities include 171 real estate
transactions, of which 116 were tax exempt.
Hote//Motel Lodging Taz
HoteUMotel lodging tax collections
through August total $86K. Compared to
year-to-date 2009, lodging tax is $ l OK or
10.0% below the same period. Compared
to year-to-date 2010 budget, lodging tax is
$15K or 15.0% below projections. 63% of
the decrease from 2009 is due to a
decrease in revenues for one major hotel in
2�1�.
REAL ESTi4TE IXCISE TAX REVENUES
Year-to-dafe thru August
2009 2010 Changefrom2009 2010AdualvsBudget
Month Actual Budgef Actual $Var %War $Var %Var
Jan $ 60,134 $ 78,746 $ 79,389 $ 19,255 32.0% $ 643 0.8°h
Feb 44,975 71,576 47,571 2,596 5.8% (24,005) -33.5%
M2r 93,877 87,215 230,191 136,314 1452°k 142,976 163.9%
qpr 60,007 92,279 125,035 65,029 108.4% 32,756 35.5%
May 391,622 95,516 78,616 (313,005) -79.9°� (16,900) -17.7°k
JUn 105,997 74,658 87,441 (18,557) -17.5°� 12,783 17.1°k
Jul 132,852 71;843 280,791 147,939 111.4°h 208,948 290.8%
Aug 83,173 64,004 60,287 (22,886) -27.5°k (3,717) -5.8°k
Sep 122,996 88,549 - - - -
Oct 92,273 60,914 - - - -
Nov 113,843 66,651 - - - - -
Dec 127,237 48,049 - - -
YTDTotal $ 972,636 $ 635,837 S 989,321 16,685 1.7°k 353,484 55.6°h
Annual Total $1,428,985 $ 900,000 nla nla nla nla nla
HOTEL/MOTEL LODGING TAX REVENUES
Yea r-to-da te thru August
2009 2010 Changefrom 2009 2010Actual vsBudgef
Monih Actual Budget Actua/ $ Var % Var $ Var % Var
Jan $ 11,565 $ 11,593 $ 8,787 $ (2,778) -24.0% $ (2,806) -24.2%
Feb 13,822 12,664 11,823 (1,999) -14.5% (841) -6.6%
M2r 9,320 10,330 8,134 (1,186) -12.7% (2,196) -21.3%
Apr 12,025 9,602 10,617 (1,408) -11.7% 1,016 10.6%
M2y 14,597 16,697 13,285 (1,312) -9.0% (3,412) -20.4%
Jun 9,910 11,443 9,489 (421) -4.2% (1,954) -17.1%
Jul 11,394 12,256 11,853 459 4.0% (403) -3.3%
Aug 13,054 16,674 12,099 (954) -7.3% (4,575) -27.4%
Sep 17,093 14,088 - - - - -
OCt 19,466 22,194 - - - - '
Nov 13,285 15,346 - - - - '
Dec 8,616 12,113 - - ' '
Y7D7otal S 95,688 5101,259 S 86,088 5 (9,599) -10.0°/a b (15,171) -15.0%
Annual Total a 154,148 S 165,000 n/a n/a n/a n/a nla
Gambling Tax
Year-to-date 2010 Gambling tax collection total $435K, which is down $337K ar 43.6% compared to year-to-date 2010 Budget. In
comparison to year-to-date 2009 collection, 2010's tax collection is $332K or 433% below. The negative variance is due to two
gambling venues closing, one of which is a major payar. The major payor is anticipating reopening - however a defmite timeline
has not been established. Gambling tax rates were amended during the June 1 and June 15 Regular Council Meeting. The
amended gambling tax rate are as follows: Card Rooms - rate from 20% to 10% effective date June 6` 2010 and Pulltabs - rate
from 5% to 3% effective date August 1 2010.
State Shared Revenue
Year-to-date 2010 distribution of $33M is above year-
to-date 2009's activity by $41K or 13%. The
favorable variance is due to increase all in areas with
the exception of Local Criminal Justice Sales Tax.
The City qualified for Criminal Justice High Crime
distribution for the remainder of 2010 through the first
half of 201 l. Year-end estimates far Criminal Justice
High Crime for 2010 is anticipated to be $200K.
Criminal Justice High Crime will be reevaluated in
June 2012 to determine if the City qualifies for the
High Crime distribution for the following year.
Permit Activity
Building, planning, and zoning permit
activities are above year-to-date 2009's
activity by $25K or 2.8%. Compared to
year-to-date budget, permit activity is up
$33K or 3.6%. The increase in permit
activity compared to 2009 is due to
increase in activity for construction of
houses and commercial real estate in the
City. Community Development's positive
expenditure variance of $158K is due to
under-spending of temporary help monies,
timing of consulting for nuisance
abatement, permit upgrade, and
professionai services.
STATE SHARED REVENUES
Year-to-date thru August
2009 2010 Change from 2009
Revenue Actual Actuaf $ %
Liquor Profits Tax $ 299,582 $ 368,196 $ 68,614 22.9%
Liquor Excise Tax 318,549 328,129 9,580 3.0%
Gim Just - Population 68,041 70,491 2,449 3.6°h
Criminal Just F6gh Gime 151,460 155,318 3,858 2.5%
Local GimJust Sales Tax 1,171,349 1,123,686 (47,664) -4.1%
Fuel Tax" 1,236,102 1,240,320 4,218 0.3%
D111-Cities 12,006 12,350 344 2.9%
YTD Total $ 3,257,090 S 3,298,489 $ 41,399 1.3%
"Fuel taxis included in both general/street, designated operating funds, and transportation C IP.
BUILDING & LAPD USE P62AAITS AND F�S
Year-to-date thru August
2009 2010 Change from 2009 2010 Actual vs Budget
Actual Budget Actual S °k S �o
Jan 74,914 70,729 70,617 (4,297) -5.7% (112) -0.2%
Feb 102,637 102,763 65,393 (37,244) -36.3% (37,370) -36.4%
AAar 65,496 97,084 150,033 84,537 129.1% 52,949 54.5%
Apr 118,447 144,274 112,032 (6,414) -5.4% (32,242) -22.3%
NYiy 84,616 125,259 134,120 49,504 58.5% 8,861 7.1%
Jun 184,937 126,796 142,582 (42,355) -22.9% 15,786 12.4%
Jul 163,050 107,883 110,339 (52,711) -32.3% 2,456 2.3%
Aug 113,306 125,212 147,524 34,218 30.2% 22,312 17.8%
Sep 80,231 76,173 - - - -
Oct 95,358 103,133 - - - -
Nov 53,465 84,960 - - - - -
Dec 112,013 86,733 - - - -
YTD Total 907,402 900,001 932,647 25,238 2.8% 32,640 3.6%
Annual Total 1,248,470 1,251,000 n/a nla n/a n/a nla
Right-of-way permits and development services permit fees are down $16K or 6.7% when compared to year-to-date 2010 budget.
Right-of-way permit activity and issuance is slightly down and the other permits such as residential, commercial and plats are down
due to economic conditions in the market place. Owners/developers are not proceeding with new plats since there is a surplus of
new homes, new lots, and other fmancial issues. This is the same for the commercial market, there is an excess of existing office
space and banks are mare stringent on lending practices. The Federal Way School Support Services Center west of S 333rd Street
and 13th Avenue S is currently under construction and will continue thru 2011. T'his project inciudes the extension of 13th Avenue
South, construction of S 332nd/333rd Street from 9th Avenue s to 13th Avenue South and widening S 336th Street and installing a
new traffic signal. Public Works Operations year-to-date expenditures total $2.7M and is $360K or ll.9% below year-to-date
budget of $3AM mainly due timing of payments for emergency management, repair/maintenance for thermo plastic pavement
markings/speed humps, road services, flashing yellow lights, and various repair/maintenance for maintaining the right of
ways/traffic control services/noxious weeds controUtree replacement.
ROW PERMITS 8� DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEES
Year-to-date thru August
2009 2010 Change from 2009 2010 Actual vs Budget
Actual Budget Actual $ % S °�
Jan 21,536 25,042 11,036 (10,499) -48.8% (14,005) -55.9%
Feb 20,293 28,143 30,655 10,363 51.1% 2,513 8.9%
Mar 19,578 20,079 26,054 6,476 33.1% 5,976 29.8%
Apr 54,982 39,211 35,290 (19,692) -35.8% (3,921) -10.0%
May 51,768 30,232 26,709 (25,059) -48.4% (3,523) -11.7%
Jun 28,828 27,162 46,479 17,651 61.2% 19,317 71.1%
Jul 36,809 30,925 17,926 (18,884) -51.3% (12,999) -42.0%
Aug 16,211 35,783 26,559 (9,224) -56.9% (9,224) -25.8%
Sep 7,866 18,025 - - - - -
Oct 26,622 32,086 - - - - -
Nov 32,461 28,018 - - - - -
Dec 38,375 34,295 - - - - -
YTD Total 250,005 236,576 220,708 (29,296) -11.7% (15,868) -6.7%
Annuai Total 355,328 349,000 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Police Department
Expenditures year-to-date August total $14.8M and is $22K or less than 1% below the budget of $14.8M mainly due to savings
found in travei/training, one-time programs offset by overage for non-budgeted purchased made related to Animal Services which
will be added as a housekeeping item at year-end.
Through August, City overtime is $6K or 1.4% below last year. There is a 9.6% increase in overtime for contracted services and
traffic school. When the increase from the billable overtime is included, the total overtime increased $ISK or 2.8%. The Overtime
budget consists of $686K far City overtime, $87K for billable time, and $86K for grant overtime reimbursement. The increase in
billable time compared to 2009 is due to the addition of the Registered Sex Offender Grant and Valley Narcotics contribution for
2010 which is reimburse to the City for overtime worked for related cases.
PDOvertime ByMonth
2009 2010 Change from 2009 2010 Actual vs Budget
Actual Budget Actual 5 °k ; °k
Jan $ 46,441 $ 53,077 $ 57,368 $ 10,927 23.5°� $ 4,291 8.1°k
Feb 39,356 44,980 40,952 1,596 4.1% (4,028) -9.0%
NFar 51,836 66,100 65,076 7,239 12.5% (1,025) -1.6%
Apr 59,767 68,307 57,612 (2,155) -3.6°�6 (10,695) -15.7°�
May 58,365 66,704 53,154 (5,211) -8.9% (13,550) -20.3°k
Jun 53,747 61,426 43,975 (9,771) -18.2% (17,451) -28.4%
Jul 64,707 73,953 60,583 (4,124) -6.4°k (13,370) -18.1°�
Aug 55,534 63,469 63,193 7,659 13.8% (276) -0.4%
Sep 49,665 56,762
Oct 43,615 49,847 - - -
Nov 35,227 40,260 - - -
Dec 35,648 40,742 - -
City Portion $ 435,753 $ 498,016 $ 441,913 6,160 1.4% (56,103) -11.3°h
Billabie 89,611 101,562 98,221 8,610 9.6°� (3,341) -1.8°k
YTDTotal 525,364 599,578 540,134 14,770 2.8°h (59,444) -9.9%
Annual Total S 752,118 3 858,137 nla nla nla nla nla
Jail Services
Jail Services year-to-date thru August is $1.SM and is above year-to-date budget of $13M by $177K or 13.6%. The 2010 budget is
based on 2009's trends. Compared to year-to-date actuals, Jail services are up $385K or 353% compared to 2009. Of the $385K
increase from 2009, $67K is due to refund from Yakima in 2009 for prepaid medical services which offset the expenses in 2009 and
the remainder is due to increase in Jail services for all jurisdiction with the exception of Fife and increased Medical Costs compared
to 2009. There is a one-time lag in payments for Jail Services with the exception of King County which is closer to Z-3 month lag.
Jail Serviees
Year-to-date thru August
. 2009 2010 2009 vs 2010 Act 2010 Bud vs Act
Month Actual Budgetrr Actual $ % : $ ' %
Jan - - - - - - -
Feb 119,209 133,812 128,846 (9,637) -8.1% 4,966 3.7%
Mar 172,722 193,880 88,727 83,995 48.6% 105,153 54.2%
Apr 4,033 79,164 226,430 (222,397) -5514.9% (147,266) -186.0%
May 237,898 267,040 348,808 (110,910) -46.6% (81,768) -30.6%
Jun 203,530 228,462 272,187 (68,657) -33.7% (43,725) -19.1%
Jul 159,542 179,085 194,429 (34,888) -21.9% (15,344) -8.6%
Aug 195,561 219,516 218,471 (22,910) -11.7% 1,046 0.5%
Sep 167,310 187,805 - - - - -
Oct 164,706 184,883 - - - - -
Nov 74,635 83,778 - - - - -
Dec 543,980 610,617 - - - - -
YTD Total 1,092,493 1,300,959 1,477,897 385,404 -35.3% (176,938 -13.6%
nnual Total 2,043,125 2,368,041 n/a n/a n/a n/a � n/a
Traffic Safery/Red Light Photo Enforcement
Traffic Safety Fund accounts for Red Light
Photo Enforcement. 2010 year-to-date net
Red Light Photo receipts are $13M, which
is received for January thru August.
Payments to ATS total $341Kand covers
January thru July. There is currently a 1-
month lag for payments to ATS. The
invoice for the month of August is $42,276
which will be paid in September.
Currently there are 10 camera locations
operating, 8 Red Light and 2 School Zone
locations. 65% of year-to-date gross
revenues were from the new cameras
installed December 2009.
Court
Municipal Court expenditures of
$953K is $7K or 0.7% below
estimates. The positive variance
is mainly due to the Court
Administrator vacancy, which
was filled in early March 2010
offset by overage in temporary
help.
Excluding probation, year-to-date
2010 revenue is down by $lOK or
less than 1.0% compared to year-
to-date 2009. When probation is
included, the decrease is adjusted
to $3K or less than 1%.
COURT REVBVUE
Year-to-date thru August
2009 2010 Change from 2009 2010 Actual vs Budget
Month Actual Budget Actual $ Var %Var $ Var % Var
January $ 101,503 $ 101,885 $ 111,414 $ 9,912 9.8% $ 9,529 9.4%
February 155,225 111,713 156,784 1,559 1.0% 45,071 40.3%
March 152,207 120,402 159,493 7,286 4.8% 39,091 32.5%
April 135,453 110,132 126,513 (8,940) -6.6% 16,382 14.9%
M8y 122,986 119,678 104,487 (18,499) -15.0% (15,191) -12.7%
June 125,491 118,829 117,509 (7,982) -6.4% (1,321) -1.1%
July 113,665 108,986 108,860 (4,805) -4.2% (126) -0.1%
August 122,104 112,506 133,575 11,471 9.4% 21,069 18.7%
Septerr�er 109,082 112,744 - - - - -
October 121,057 125,009 - - - - -
November 97,465 113,339 - - - - -
December 124,417 121,246 - - -
Subtotal a 1,028,633 a 904,131 � 1,018,636 � (9,997) -1.0% S 114,504 12.7%
Robation Svcs 45,365 115,132 52,174 6,809 15.0% (62,958) -54.7%
YTD Total 51,073,999 a 1,019,263 a 1,070,810 $ (3,189) -0.3% a 51,547 5.1%
Annual Total 1,547,204 1,477,469 n/a n/a n/a nla n/a
COU2T REVBVUE
Year-to-date thru August
2009 2010 Change from 2009
Actual Actual $ Var % Var
Civil P�nafties $ 14,391 $ 16,224 $ 1,834 12.7%
Traffic & Non-Parldng 730,855 686,876 (43,979) -6.0%
Parking Infractions 62,722 33,772 (28,950) -46.2%
DUI & Other Nisd 37,430 44,037 6,608 17.7%
GYirrinal Traffic N6sd 1,567 2,202 634 40.5%
GYiminal Costs 58,503 76,556 18,052 30.9%
k�terest / Other / Nisc 29,049 38,040 8,991 30.9%
GYiminal Conv Fees 13,496 18,574 5,078 37.6%
Shared Court Costs 35,359 45,737 10,378 29.4%
Services & Charges 45,261 56,618 11,356 25.1%
Subtotal $ 1,028,633 a 1,018,636 a (9,997) -1.0%
Probation Services 45,365 52,174 6,809 15.0%
YTDTotal $ 1,073,999 $ 1,070,810 3 (3,189) -0.3%
The major decrease in traffic/non-parking and parking
infractions is due to an overall decrease in court filings. For
traffic/non-parking filings have decreased 11% and for
parking infraction filings have decreased 37% from year-to-
date 2009.
Parks & Recreation
Overall parks operations expenditures, including administration, parks maintenance and general recreation, through August 2010
total $2.6M and is $6K or 0.2% above the year-to-date budget of $2.6M mainly due to timing of payments for one time programs.
Savings of $110K in repairs and maintenance, $SK in professional services, $28K in intergovernmental and timing of internal
services charges of $35K compared to 2009 is offset by overages of $23K in salaries and benefits and $155K in temporary/seasonal
help savings. It is expected that overall, parks operations will not exceed their budget at the end of 2010.
General Recreation and Cudtural Services
Direct program expenditures total $671K or 893% of the total annual budget of $752K not including indirect costs. Including
indirect administration costs, recreation expenditures total $862K and are 85.9% of the total annual budget of $1,003K. Recreation
fees total $716K and are 93.1% of the total annual budget of $769K. Recreation fees have recovered 106.7% of direct program
costs and is 4.4% above the annual budgeted recovery ratio of 102.3%. Considering indirect administration costs, the recovery
ratio is reduced to 83.0% or is 6.4% above with the annual budgeted recovery ratio of 76.6%. General Recreation revenues
projections were increased in 2010 by $175K without a corresponding increase in expenditures. Disregarding this change, the
budgeted recovery ratio would be 59.2%, when this is taken into consideration; their recovery ratio is above budgeted. It is
expected the department will exceed their budget but will be offset by expenditure savings within the General Fund Budget.
Total Parks revenues of $719K is $117K or 19.4% above year-to-date budget of $602K. Compared to actual, general recreation is
above year-to-date 2009's activity of $627K by $92K. Positive variance compared to 2009 year-to-date actual is due to:
■ Adult Athletics — Revenues are up $SK from 2009 due to an increase in participation. Expenses are up $24K from 2009 due to
cost associated with administering the leagues such as staffing, equipment and officials. Two new Men's soccer leagues will
begin in September with an estimate of 20 teams and new volleyball leagues will start at the end of September.
■ Youth Athletics — Revenues are down $SK from 2009, expenses are down $15K. This year there were lower numbers in the
Skyhawks sports camps than normal. Skyhawks Sports Academy is implementing new markering strategies to increase the
numbers for next year.
■ Senior Services — Revenues are up by $22K compared ta 2009 and expenses are up $i 1K. The most dramatic reason for the
success of the senior program has been the increased numbers of participants in each of the programs. This increase is due to
several factors including the creation of a monthly calendar that goes out to all the participants and highlights upcoming events
and opportunities for the seniors. One particular class to highlight would be the drop-in bridge program which has seen steady
growth over the past year and currently averages 40 people per day twice a week.
■ Community Recreation — Compared to 2009, revenues are up $37K and expenses are up $28K. The summer day camp
program just fmished and it was a very good year, averaging 140 kids per week. Staff is using contacts with those participants
to build the no-school day programs, which are offered each day that the Federal Way Schools are out. Several people are
already registered for these programs.
■ Recreation Inc. — Revenues are up $ l OK from 2009 and expenses are up $13K. Staff is experiencing success asking for
donations. A recent success was obtaining free admission to the Seattle Aquarium and to a recent Mariner game. There are
some programs upcoming that will be expense free featuring all volunteer staffing.
■ Arts & Special Events — Revenues are up $3K and expenses are up $6K from 2009. Staff is warking hard to create new
sponsorship opportunities to offset the difficulty experienced in obtaining event sponsors in 2010. Some large events upcoming
this year are Canine Karnival, Fall Carnival and Jingle Bell Brunch.
■ Red White & Blues Festival — Revenues are up $SK and expenses are down $7K. Staff has started planning for the 2011
event and is working on more sponsor perks to entice more large sponsors.
'The table below is a comparison of budgeted versus actual subsidy and recovery ratio by program.
General Recreation and Cultural Services (continue)
"Annual budgeted revenues of $768,500 does not include $6,500 budgeted for Celebration Parks. When included, total budget revenues jor Parks and General
Recreation total $775K, which equals the General/Street Summary page for Parks and General Recreation budgeted revenues. 2010 year-to-date revenue of
$715,588 does not include $3,498 for Arts Commission and Celebration Parks. When included, the total year-to-date revenues for Parks and General Recreation
total $719, 086, which eguals the General/Street Summary page for Parks and General Recreation year-to-date actual revenues.
Federal Wav Communi Center
The Federal Way Community Center Fund was established as a special revenue fund supported by user fees and designated
utility tax transfer.
2009 2010 Budget vs Actual
Federal Way Annual YTD YTD YTD Favorable/(Unfavorable)
Community Center Budget Actual Actual Badget Budget Actual S ° /a
Beginning Fund Balance $ 984 $ 984 $ 984 $ 240,014 $ 240,014 $ 240,014 n/a n/a
Revenues
Daily Drop-ins $ 328,593 $ 322,697 $ 255,382 $ 353,593 $ 279,833 $ 248,722 $(31,110) -11.1°�
Passes 630,000 617,481 413,170 630,000 421,547 479,011 57,464 13.6%
City Staff Membership - Employee 43,500 54,352 44,227 43,500 35,397 28,030 (7,367) -20.8%
City Staff Membership - Family - 5,323 2,474 - - 3,423 3,423 n/a
Youth Athletic Programs 35,000 37,277 26,286 35,000 24,680 39,251 14,570 59.0%
Open Gym/Indoor Playground 1,000 - - 1,000 - - - n/a
Aquatics Programs-Lessons/Classes 110,000 119,710 94,673 110,000 86,994 96,871 9,876 11.4%
Childcare Fees 10,000 8,833 6,337 10,000 7,175 6,054 (1,120) -15.6%
Fitness Classes/Fitness Training 85,000 76,907 59,516 85,000 65,779 63,402 (2,376) -3.6%
Towel/equipment Rentals 8,000 6,146 4,625 8,000 6,020 3,999 (2,021) -33.6%
Pool RentalslCompetitive-Lap Lanes 21,000 17,758 12,864 21,000 15,213 10,602 (4,617) -30.3%
Rentals 185,000 199,160 135,790 185,000 126,136 142,721 16,585 13.1 %
Merchandise Sales 21,000 8,409 6,584 21,000 16,441 6,130 (10,311) -62.7%
ConcessionsNending 24,000 19,541 18,606 24,000 22,851 3 (22,848) -100.0%
Interest Earnings/Other Misc Revenues - 836 817 - - 892 892 n/a
General Parks/Recreation - Facility use charge - - - 25,000 16,665 16,665 - 0.0%
Total Revenue 1,502,093 1,494,430 1,081,351 1,552,093 1,124,730 1,145,775 21,046 1.9°k
Expenditures
Personnel Costs 1,244,283 1,257,557 881,656 1,312,215 919,977 � 833,504 86,473 9.4°�
Supplies 159,250 147,099 105,204 151,468 108,329 91,243 17,086 15.8%
Other Services 8 Charges 133,232 174,165 118,365 124,716 84,759 108,959 (24,201) -28.6%
Utility Cost 381,000 371,786 252,589 381,000 258,849 218,529 40,320 15.6%
Intergovemmental 15,500 18,435 12,157 15,500 10,222 18,838 (8,616) -84.3%
Capital 3,246 - - - - - n/a
Intemal Service Charges 123,594 84,809 86,465 125,727 83,819 83,819 - 0.0%
Total Expenditures 2,056,859 2,057,096 1,456,436 2,170,626 1,465,954 1,354,892 111,062 7.6%
Operating Rev Over / (Under Exp) (554,766) (562,666) (375,085) (558,533) (341,224) (209,117) 132,108 �8.7%
Transfer in from:
Utility Tax - Reserves 311,927 311,927 - 319,727 - - - n/a
Utility Tax - Operations 554,766 554,766 419,410 582,504 209,118 209,118 - 0.0%
CIP - Marketing Study 50,000 50,000 - - - - - n/a
Contribution/Donation/Transfer in - Reserves - - - 85,645 90,195 90,195 - 0.0%
Total Other Sources 916,693 916,693 419,410 987,876 299,313 299,313 - 0.0%
Other Uses
Capital/Use of Reserves - - - - 4,288 4,288 n/a
Other Services/Charges 50,000 50,000 33,503 - - - - 0.0%
Total Other Uses 50,000 50,000 33,503 - 4,288 4,288 - 0.0°�
Net Income 371,927 304,027 10,822 429,343 (46,199) 85,908 132,108 -286.0%
Tem ora Intertund Loan - Paid 65,000 65,000 65,000 - - - - n/a
Endin Fund Balance $ 247,911 $ 240,014 $ (53,195) $ 669,356 $ 193,815 $ 325,921 S 132,107 68.2%
Operating Recovery Ratio . o . o . a . o . o . o n a n/a
*2010 Year-to-date Budget is based on 2009 trends.
The operating revenue budget includes $1.6M in user fees/program revenues, $583K contribution from utility tax for
operations, $320K contribution from utility tax for reserves, and $25K use charge from General Fund Recreation for use of the
facility. Through August, operating revenues total $1,1465K and is $21K or 1.9% above year-to-date 2010 budget. In
comparison to 2010's year-to-date budget:
Federal Way Community Center (continued)
■ Daily Drop-in revenues are $31K below. This is primarily due to conversions to Membership passes. Daily Drop-in
revenues are slightly behind ($7K) of 2009 YTD due to increased staff efforts to up-sell daily guests to membership
passes.
• Pass revenues are $57K ar 13.6% above due to marketing and membership retention efforts. Monthly average pass
numbers are tracking 300 more per month in 2010 versus 2009 YTD. In addition, changes to program offerings, along
with improved customer service efforts are helping bring in new customers and retain current ones.
■ City Staff Membership revenues and enrollment numbers are down slightly with the adoption of new Employee Pass
guidelines that included an Employee Fee of $10/$25 per quarter.
■ Youth Athletic revenues are $15K or 59.0% above due to increased attendance and a greater variety of youth athletic
programs such as basketball, climbing, soccer, FIT Camp, and Youth PE.
■ Aquatic Programs are $lOK or 11.4% above due to strong summer registrations in swim lessons, private lessons, lifeguard
classes, and swim team. Also, low competitive pool rentals has created more open space for more swim lessons.
■ Childcare fees were less than $1K or 15.6% below.
■ Fitness Class revenue were $2K or 3.6% below as compared to high numbers from Biggest Loser '09 due to programs
being spread out a little bit more consistently throughout the year, but have moved closer to projections due to the recent
success of small group training (i.e. Pump It Up! and Boxing). The steady revenues should meet projections by year-end.
■ ToweUequipment rentals are $2K below year-to-date budget due to elimination of climbing gear rental fees for Annual
Pass holders. The daily climbing gear rental fee was eliminated and added as a membership benefit. This new
membership benefit has been well received by new and existing household members.
• Competitive pool rental revenues are $SK below year-to-date budget. School district usage was reduced for their budget
reasons, but club use is high right now, which is offsetting some of that loss in revenue.
■ Rental revenues are $17K or 13.1% above projections due to increased marketing and customer service efforts. Birthday
party rentals are performing very well due to increased customer service support, increased awareness from web site, and
bad weather outdoors encourage people to celebrate indoors.
■ Merchandise sales are not reaching revenue expectations due to delays in the design and purchasing of logo wear and
other promotional items. When the cafe opened, customers began focusing their point of sale purchasing toward the cafe
items and away from front counter sales, which included merchandise.
■ Concession sales have shifted to the Splash Cafe and are now included in the rental revenue category. Summer Sales for
the Cafe were very strong.
Through August, operating expenditures total $1,355K and is $ll 1K or 7.6% below year-to-date 2010's budget. Federal Way
Community Center has recovered 84.6% of operating expenditures compared to the year-to-date budgeted recovery ratio of
76.7%. In comparison to year-to-date 2010's budget:
■ Personnel costs were $86K ar 9.4% below due to savings in FTE wages, and cost effective service level changes.
■ �upply costs were $17K or 15.8% below budget due to better inventory controls, supplier price breaks, and staffmg
efforts to reduce spending.
■ Other services and charges were $24K or 28.6% above due to increased cost of Personal Training and other Fitness and
Youth Athletics Professional contract fees, such as Kids Love Soccer. Service charges for marketing and advertising are
also slightly higher because they are not covered under ona�time funding in 2010.
■ Utility costs were $40K or 15.6% below the YTD budget, $20K of the savings is due to the timing of payments, the
remaining is due to staff working hard to adjust lighting, heating, and cooling schedules to improve energy efficiencies.
■ Intergovernmental costs were up $9K or 843% due mostly to paying sales tax for the biggest loser program from 2009
thru March 2010. In addition, monthly sales tax remittance is up because revenues are up.
City's contribution of $902K for the Community Center was scheduled to annually provide $583K for maintenance/operations
and $320K for capital reserves. Through August 2010, $209K is needed to cover maintenance and operations.
Dumas Bay Centre
Dumas Bay Centre operating revenue of $360K below by $41K or 10.2% compared to year-to-date budget of $401K. The facility
has been able to secure a large amount of overnight retreats in the Summer and Fall to offset the shortfall for day-use meetings.
Dumas Bay Centre has also implemented a number of cost saving measures to reduce operating expenditures. Adjustments
Dumas Bav Centre (continued)
include, but are not limited to securing lower contracted services for room linens and cleaning, using in-house services for
maintenance and landscaping, reorganizing the menu selections and recommending the "chefs choice" option which will reduce
food costs. Staff is in negotiations currently to produce a marketing and communications plan for the Dumas Bay Centre. This
will assist in producing additional revenues for the facility.
Operating expenditures through August total $357K, which is $62K or 14.9% below year-to-date budget of $420K. Ending fund
balance for DBC is a positive $152K, of which $70K is earmarked for marketing study and implementation. Staff continues to
work with new rentals and increasing services with existing rental groups daily and are seeing a positive impact to the recovery
ratio which is now 100.7% due to a combinarion of cutting back on expenses and revenues slowly growing.
Dumas Bay Centre
Year-tadate thru August
Annual8udget Year-to-date Actual
Recovery Recovery Variance
Program Revenue` Expend Subsidy Ratio Revenue Expend Subsidy Ratio Subsidy
DUMAS BAY CENTRE
Dumas Ba Centre 603,786 571,056 (32,730) 105.7% 359,800 357,371 (2,429 100.7% (30,301)
Total Dumas Ba Centre S 603,786 S 571,056 S (32,730) 105.7% ; 359,800 ; 357,371 E (2,429) 100.7% (;30,301)
Other Departmental Variances
City Council expenditures total $345K and is under budget by $1K mainly due savings found in one-time traveUtraining offset by
minimum increase in food/beverage for additional meetings relating to the change of government.
City Manager expenditures of $897K is under year-to-date budget by $264K mainly due City Manager vacancy and timing of one-
time programs for Energy Efficiency Grant, Public Defender, and E-Newsletter start-up.
Economic Development expenditures of $147K is below budget by $SSK mainly due to savings found in timing of one-time
programs which include one-time consultant cost and downtown redevelopment carry-forward.
Human Resources expenditures of $572K is below budget by $176K mainly due to savings of $22K in salaries/benefits, $9K in
temp help, timing of $13K in professional services, and timing of $121K in election costs.
Finance expenditures of $642K is below budget by $18K mainly due to savings in temporary help when compared to 2009's
spending patterns.
Law expenditures total $931K and is $lOSK below budget mainly due to savings in salary/benefits and temporary help and under
spending of outside counsel compared to 2009's spending patterns.
CASH & INVESTMENTS
Currently all excess balances are invested in the State Investment Pool. The average portfolio yield is 0.27%, which is above the
average 6-month US Treasury Bill (0.19%).
The total invested balance at the end of August is $47.7M. The state pool is composed of Treasury Securities (13.60%), interest
bearing bank deposits (9.79%), agency floating rate notes (16.02%), agency variable rate notes (8.01%), discount notes (36.06%),
certificates of deposit (1.24%), repurchase agreements (13.86%), Agency Callables (0.29%), and N.O.W accounts (1.14%).
SIP Average Invested Balance by Type
August 2010
Agency
IB Bank Floating Rate Agency
�Deposits rptes Variable Rate
s.79% �6.02% � o � ^ �
Treasury
Securities
13.60%
Agency � / T
Callables � (
0.29% �Purchase �W
Agreements Accounts
13.86% ��14%
Certrficates W
Deposit
�2a�
Discount
Notes
3s.os �
Interest Rates Comparison
For the Month of August 2010
6.0%
5.0%
4.0%
3.0%
2.0%
1.0%
0.0%
■ 6 Month T-Bill
■ State Irnestrnent Pool
❑ In-house Inrestment
■ Portfolio Arerage
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
FUND ACTIVITY SUMMARY
Beginning Fund Netlncome Endingfund
Fund/Fund Name Balance at 1/1/201'0 Revenue E�cpenditure Inl(Out) Balance at 8/31/2010
6eneral/Streef Fund: $'> 8,345,198 � 29,716,932 $ 29,814,749 3 (97,817) � 8,247,381
Debt Service Fund: 4,164,479 1,292,908 2 275,390 (982,481) 3,187,999
Special Revenue
102 Arterial Street 633,379 1,331,586 1,438,488 (106,902) 526,476
103 Utility Tax (`) 3,030,626 8,925,285 8,707,315 217,970 3,248,596
106 Solid Waste & RecyGing 151,639 310,239 296,500 13,739 165,379
107 Special Contracts/Studies Fund 271,062 300,963 2,100 298,863 569,925
109 Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax 201,347 91,435 121,513 (30,079) 171,268
110 2% for the Arts 293 - - - 293
111 Federal Way Community Center 240,014 1,445,088 1,359,180 85,908 325,921
112 Traffic Safety Fund 155,288 972,037 502,938 469,099 624,387
119 CDBG ('"') - 11,141 53,684 (42,543) (42,543)
120 Path & Trails 133,511 87,568 161,000 (73,432) 60,079
Subtota/ Specia! Revenue Funds 4,817,159 13,475,342 12,642,719 832,623 5,649,782
Capital Project:
301 Downtown Redevelopment 3,051,348 529,349 367,875 161,474 3,212,822
302 Municipal Facilities 915,959 1,312 341,171 (339,859) 576,100
303 Parks 2,582,254 504,014 764,543 (260,529) 2,321,725
304 Surface Water Management 3,765,536 5,773 1,064,455 (1,058,682) 2,706,854
306 Transportation 16,384,794 4,179,462 3,313,008 866,454 17,251,248
Subtota/ Capkal Projects 26,699,897 5,219,909 5,851,051 (631,142) 26;068,749
Enterprise Funds
401 Surface Water Management 1,114,704 2,453,065 2,044,200 408,865 1,523,570
402 Dumas Bay 179,690 492,354 406,295 86,060 265,750
Subtotal Enferprise Funds 1,294,394 2,945,420 2,450,495 ' 494,925 1;789,319
Internal Service Funds
501 Risk Management 5,337,573 745,821 752,686 (6,865) 5,330,708
502 Information Systems 3,015,537 1,540,456 1,199,764 340,693 3,356,230
503 Mail & Duplication 294,044 135,761 78,265 57,496 351,540
504 Fleet & Equipment 4,291,127 1,525,575 991,825 533,750 4,824,877
505 Buildings 8 Furnishings 1,204,763 513,420 237,206 276,214 1,480,977
Subtotai I►rtemai S�rvice Funds 14,143,044 4,461,033 3,259,745 1,201,288 75,344,332
Tota/ All Funds � 59,464,165 $; 57,111,545 $ 56,294,149 a 817,396 S 60,281;567
`Utility Tax ending fund balance of $3, 248, 596 fncludes $713, 821 reserved tor I�rop 1.
"CDBG Negative ending balance is due to timing of grant reimbursements.
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 5, 2010
CITY OF FEDER�L WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
ITEM #:
SUS.�ECT: VOUCHERS
POLICY QUESTION Should the City approve the vouchers in the total amount of $2,992,448.48?
COIVIMITTEE: Finance, Economic Development, and Regional Affairs Committee
CATEGORY:
� Consent
❑ City Council Business
STAFF REPORT BY: Tho
❑ Ordinance
❑ Resolution
Finance Director
MEETING DATE: September 28 ,2010
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
DEPT Finance
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the
City of Federal Way, Washington, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said liens.
Finance Director
Attachments: Voucher List
Options Considered: NA
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: NA
/� �/ ` - �,/
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL• l��� G a�� 1� .l��✓'�`'^ DIRECTOR APPROVAL: � �(�
Committee Council Committee Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward approval of the vouchers to the October S, 2010
consent agenda for approval.
Committee Member
Member
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION "I move approval of the vouchers pursuant to RCN�42.24. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1sT reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED— 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION #
�
City of Federal Way - AccourKs Payable Check List
Bank of Am erica Page 1 of 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
219017 8/26/2010 005541 FRIENDS OF HYLEBOS WETLANDS, 3,881.46
6/8/2010 FW HF 01 PARKS-HYLEBOS WETIAND PROJ AG1 3,881.46
219018 S/26/2010 005541 FRIENDS OF HYLEBOS WETLANDS, 7,684.50
8/2/2010 FW HF 01A PARKS-HYLEBOS WETLAND PROJ AG1 7,684.50
219019 8/26l2010 005541 FRIENDS OF HYLEBOS WETLANDS, 3,408.40
8/2/2010 FW HF 02 PARKS-HYLEBOS WETLAND PROJ AG1 3,408.40
219020 8/30/2010 001276 FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY COUNCIL, 36,906.33
8/23I2010 200 CM-SAND SCULPTURE EVENTAG10-1 2,830.41
8/23/2010 200 CM-SAND SCULPTURE EVENT AG10-1 34,075.92
219021 8/31/2010 012432 8TH & 9TH LLC, 135.00
8/23/2010 02-67136 REFUND PW-02-67136 INSPECTION DEPOSIT 540.00
8/23/2010 02-67136 REFUND PW-02-67136 INSPECTION DEPOSIT -405.00
219022 8/31/2010 000083 AARO INC DBA THE LOCK SHOP, 164.84
8/18/2010 70469 FWCC-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 30.39
8/12/2010 70392 PWST-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 122.62
7/19/2010 69948 FWCGLOCKSMITH SERVICES 11.83
219023 8/31/2010 000332 ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS INC, 125.00
7/31/2010 MMFWA00613-9 LAW-07/10 LEGAL MESSENGERS SRV 62.50
7/31/2010 MMFWA00613-9 LAW-07/10 LEGAL MESSENGERS SRV 62.50
219024 S/31/2010 011322 ABELLA, C. ANGELO 300.00
8l12/2010 OS/12/10 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 200.00
8/20/2010 08/20/10 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 100.00
219025 8/31/2010 004234 ABT TOWING OF FEDERAL WAY INC, 350.40
7/27/2010 50285 PD-VEHICLE TOW CASE 10-8520 175.20
7/27/2010 50286 PD-VEHICIE TOW CASE 10-8520 175.20
219026 8/31/2010 001856 ACTION SERVICES CORPORATION, 75.00
8/5/2010 66519 PWST-EMERGENCY SWEEP 324TH/HWY 75.00
219027 8/31/2010 010423 AG ENTERPRISE SUPPLY, INC, 310.52
7/27/2010 50592 PWST-MANIFOLD VAVLE 310.52
219028 8/31/2010 000568 AGRI SHOP INC, 1,185.93
6/25/2010 10911/1 PWST-REPAIR STIHL SAW 28.08
8/2/2010 1162t/t PKM-POWER SHEAR REPAIR 12.72
8/9/2010 11752/1 PKM-TWO BACKPACK BLOWERS '1,040.14
8/10/2010 11769/1 SWM-OIL FOR HAND TOOIS 104.99
219029 8/31/2010 005225 AIRGAS - NOR PAC INC, 19.45
7/31/2010 101658495 PD-NITROGEN 19.45
219030 8/31/2010 000475 ALARM CENTERS/CUSTOM SECURITY, 142.35
7/30/2010 710886 PKM-SERVICE ALARM 142.35
219031 8l3112010 010929 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING, 555.31
8/9/2010 67332 CD-PERMIT BACKERS 555.31
219032 8/31/2010 012411 ALLIED SAFE & VAULT, 77.00
8/11/2010 10-103369 REFUND CD-10-103369 REFUND PERMIT 3.00
8/11l2010 10-103369 REFUND CD-10-103369 REFUND PERMIT 3.00
8/11/2010 10-103369 REFUND CD-10-103369 REFUND PERMIT 71.00
219033 8/31/2010 001285 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC, 141.26
7/29/2010 TM-109993 SWM-DAPCO ADHESIVE 141.26
219034 8l31/2010 001012 AL'S TOWING,
8/18l2010 73906
219035 8/31/2010 001110 AMAYA ELECTf�IC,
5/20/2010 8283-9
219036 8/31/2010 003269 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER CO,
7/29/2010 1854300
8/3/2010 1865695
219037 8/31/2010 001522 AMERICAN RED CROSS,
7/27/2010 11002312
219038 8/31/2010 005959 APPLIED CONCEPTS INC,
6/28/2010 191326-1
6/28/2010 191326-1
219039 8/31/2010 006211 AQUATECHNEX, INC.,
8/3/2010 2560
PD-VEHICLE TOW CASE 10-10697
PKM-STLK SOCCER FIELD WIRE THE
FWCC-SHOWER CURTAINS
FWCC-SHOWER CURTAINS
FWCC-FIRSTAID TRNG PROCESSING
PD-3 RADAR UNITS WTSC GRANT $1
PD-RADAR UNITS INV 191326-1 US
SWM-STLK AQUATIC PLANT MGMT AG
175.20
175.20
1,879.33
1,879.33
447.64
271.19
176.45
114.00
114.00
4,977.37
4,993.20
-15.83
1,551.13
414.00
Bank of America
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice
8/3l2010 2561
8l13/2010 2589
8/13/2010 2590
219040 8l31/2010 010530 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES,
8/10I2010 655-5059062
S/17/2010 655-5070939
8/24/2010 655-5082757
219041 8/31l2010 010530 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES,
8/9/2010 655-5056468
8/9/2010 655-5056469
219042 8/31/2010 003649 ARBUTHNOT, STEVEN
8/4/2010 ARBUTHNOT 2010
219043 8/31/2010 001233 AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE,
12l6/2009 030 598 3151 001
12/6/2009 030 598 3151 001
12/6/2009 030 598 3151 001
8/6/2010 030 598 3151 001
8/6/2010 030 598 3151 001
S/6/2010 030 598 3151 001
219044 8/31/2010 012352 AUTOADDITIONS, INC,
8/17/2010 28808
8/17/2010 28809
219045 8/31/2010 012412 AVID IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS,
7/14/2010 280692
219046 8/31/2010 009011 BAKER, SIERRA D
8/19/2010 BAKER 2010
219047 8/31/2010 00'1604 BALL, GIGI Y
8/20/2010 08/20/10
219048 8l31l2010 006119 BASELINE ENGINERRING, INC.,
8/6/2010 12580
219049 8/31/2010 011589 BENNETT, LAUREL
8/20/2010 8
219050 8/31l2010 010185 BIRD, FERESIKA S
S/20/2010 08/20/10
8/17/2010 OS/17/10
219051 8/31/2010 002645 BIRTH TO THREE DEVELOPMENT CTR,
7/9/2010 2ND QTR 2010
219052 8/31/2010 001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC,
6/17/2010 820160
219053 8/31/2010 012433 BORISHKEVICH, VES
8/23/2010 813324
219054 8/31/2010 011359 C.A.T. DESIGN,
8/3/2010 CFW2010-003
219055 8/31/2010 008331 CAPRI EVENTS CHICAGO,
8/2/2010 1000-2491
219056 8/31I2010 012371 CASCADE ENGINEERING SERVICES,
7/23l2010 ML-10072301621
219057 8/31/2010 012431 CASTLETON, JENNIFER
8/20/2010 CASTLETON 2010
219058 8/31/2�10 010954 CEDAR GROVE ORGANICS RECYCLING,
7/31/2010 0000031677
219059 8l31/2010 004676 CENTERSTAGE THEATRE ARTS,
8/9/2010 AUGUST 9, 2010
8/9/2010 AUGUST 9, 2010
219060 8/31/2010 012038 CERIUM NETWORKS INC,
9/1/2010 018470
9/1/2010 018470
9/1/2010 018470
219061 8/31/2010 011480 CHESAPEAKE REALTY ADVISORS LLC,
8/24/2010 AUGUST 2010
219062 8/31/2010 011595 CITY OF BUCKLEY,
8/1/2010 JULY 2010
Description
SWM-N.LKAQUATIC PLANT MGMT ST
SWM-N.LK AQUATIC PLANT MGMT ST
SWM-STLK AQUATIC PLANT MGMT AG
DBC-LINEN SERVICE
DBC-LINEN SERVICE
DBC-LINEN SERVICE
FWCGLINEN SVC
FWCC-FLOOR MATS SVC
PD-NTOA TACTICAL CONF ARBUTHNO
IT/ALL-12l09 LONG DISTANCE SVC
IT/ALL-12/09 LONG DISTANCE SVC
IT/ALL-12/09 LONG DISTANCE SVC
IT/ALL-07/10 LONG DISTANCE SVC
IT/ALL-07/10 LONG DISTANCE SVC
IT/ALL-07/10 LONG DISTANCE SVC
PWST-SAFETY LIGHTS TO RETROFIT
PWST-SAFETY LIGHTS TO RETROFIT
PD-ANIMAL SVC MINI TRACKER AVI
PD-9MM HOLSTER - S. BAKER
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
SWM-ON CALL SURVEYING AG10-082
CM-2010 ARTS ALIVE WRITING SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
CDHS-Q2 2010 FAMILY SVCS PROG.
PD-TILFORD BT ALLOW
PRCS-REFUND RENTAL DEPOSIT
CM-TOURISM BROCHURE & MAP GRAP
CM-WOMEN'S TRIATHLON SERIES AG
PD-RADAR CALIBRATION
LAW-DRE TRAINING J CASTLETON
SWR-07l10 ORGANICS RECYCLING S
DBC-08/10 KFT MANAGEMENT AG09-
DBC-08/10 KFT MANAGEMENT AG09-
IT-09/10 PHONENOICE MAIL SYST
IT-09/10 PHONENOICE MAIL SYST
IT-09l10 PHONENOICE MAIL SYST
CM-08/10 CITY CNTR CONSUITANCY
PD-07/10 PRISONER LODGING
Page 2 of 30
Amount Check Total
414.00
500.63
222.50
289.14
19.10
153.67
116.37
129.26
34.49
94.77
400.00
400.00
158.05
54.45
50.09
4.36
24.58
22.61
1.96
7,060.44
3,505.37
3,555.07
358.89
355.89
112.52
112.52
100.00
100.00
11,210.00
11,210.00
43.75
43.75
200.00
100.00
100.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
60.17
60.17
100.00
100.00
662.50
662.50
8,000.00
8,000.00
1,568.76
1,568.76
229.52
229.52
40.65
40.65
5,300.00
6,300.00
-1,000.00
988.22
49.41
494.11
444.70
973.00
973.00
8,664.00
8,664.00
Bank of America Page 3 of 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
219063 8/31/2010 004838 CITY OF ENUMCLAW, 605.00
8/4/2010 03056 PD-07/10 PRISONER LODGING AG10 605.00
219064 8/31/2010 000951 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, 24,325.12
8/17/2010 AG10-072 #3 PWST-348TH & 1ST AVE IMPROVEME 17,324.78
8/16/2010 AG10-109 #1 PWST-PAC HWY S HOV PH IV AG10- 7,000.34
219065 8/31/2010 010360 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, 637.40
8/13/2010 CK #1154 PD-WSSO SCHL SAFETY TRNG SANDE 185.00
8/13/2010 CK #1154 PD-WSSO SCHL SAFETY TRNG SANDE 452.40
219066 8/31/2010 010323 CITY OF SEATTLE, 80.00
8/19/2010 177624 R TOOT FWCC-R TOOT BOILER LICENSE REN 80.00
219067 8/31/2010 003564 CLARY, JOHN 400.00
8/10/2010 CLARY 2010 PD-NTOA TACTICAL CONF. J CLARY 400.00
219068 8l31l2010 003752 COASTWIDE SUPPLY DBA, 1,378.33
8/13/2010 T2219146 CH&JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 160.83
8/12/2010 W2219279-1 FWCC-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 71.42
8/9/2010 T2219938 CHB-JANITORIAL SUPPIIES 204.55
8/9/2010 T2219978 CHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 65.44
8/6/2010 T2217005-1 DBC-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 87.73
8/3/2010 T2217701 PKM-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 407.12
8/2/2010 W2216270 FWCC-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 102.10
7/30l2010 T2217005 DBC-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 222.38
7/29/2010 W2213861-1 FWCC-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 56.76
219069 8/31/2010 007591 COMMERCIAL SPACE ONLINE INC, 100.00
8/1/2010 74205 CM-OS/10 PROPERTY DATABASE SER 100.00
219070 8/31/2010 002563 COMPLETE COLLISION CENTER, 871.40
7/6/2010 8429 PD-REPAIR DOOR CASE 10-8060 871.40
219071 8/31/2010 012006 CONSTRUCT COMPANY LLC, 330,260.07
8/17l2010 AG10-072 #3 PWST-348TH & 1ST AVE IMPROVEME 347,584.85
S117/2010 AG10-072 #3 PWST-348TH 8 1ST AVE IMPROVEME -17,324.78
219072 8/31/2010 008445 COPIERS NORTHWEST INC, 434.34
8/6/2010 55932 IT-TONER 189.16
8/18/2010 INV403942 IT-08/10 CANON IR1025N 47.69
8/19/2010 INV404343 IT-08/10 CANON IRC5030 197.49
219073 8/31/2010 000721 CORLISS RESOURCES INC, 337.60
7/26/2010 255248 PWST-CONCRETE MIX 337.60
219074 8/31/2010 012413 COSTA, KRYSTLE 67.50
8/13/2010 808593 PRCS-REFUND ONE LEAGUE GAME FE 67.50
219075 8/31l2010 009505 D& L SUPPLY AND MFG., INC, 45.88
8!5/2010 261616 PKM-PLUMBING SUPPLIES 22.94
8!5/2010 261617 PKM-PLUMBING SUPPLIES 22.94
219076 8/31/2010 000854 D J TROPHY,
8/17/2010
219077 8/31/2010 012416 D. RIDDING ELECTRIC,
8/17/2010
219078 8/31/2010 011297 DASH MEDICAL GLOVES,
7/23/2010
219079 8/31/2010 701985 DAWN,
229943
CH&NAME PLATE HOLDER
FI-RIDDING ELECT. DUPLICATE LI
PD-EXAM GLOVES
CDHS-Q1 2010 CONTINUUM HOUSING
CDHS-Q2 2010 CONTINUUM HOUSING
PD-CHECK THROTTLE
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
PKCP-WTRlCLR RNTL ACCT#2724118
PWFLT-GAS & OIL
PWFLT-ELECTRICAL WORK
PWFLT-DODR WEATHER STRIPING
54.73
54.73
75.00
75.00
778.80
778.80
10,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
13.66
13.66
611.50
186.50
162.50
125.00
137.50
13.14
13.14
864.68
178.45
98.06
62.84
04-02667 REFUND
INV508138
4/6l2010 1 ST QTR 2010
4/6l2010 2ND QTR 2010
219080 8/31/2010 004461 DESTINATION HARLEY-DAVIDSON,
7/6/2010 96145030
219081 8/31/2010 005341 DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA
7l13/2010 07l13/10
8/17/2010 OS/17/10
8/10/2010 08/10l10
8/20/2010 08/20/10
219082 8/31/2010 000939 DS WATERS OF AMERICA, LP,
8/1/2010 081029241185236041
219083 8/31/2010 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DBA),
8/4/2010 1076064
8/7/2010 1076127
S/7/2010 1076127
Bank of A merica Page 4 of 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
8/7l2010 1076134 PWFLT-TIRES 4� 1.89
8/6/2010 1076091 PWFLT-LOF 86.92
8/6/2010 1076091 PWFLT-ELECTRICAL �NORK 26.52
219084 8/31l2010 010030 ECOLAB INC, 202.77
8/15/2010 3213802 DBC-08/10 DISHWASHER RENTAL 202.77
219085 8/31/2010 004344 EMERGENCY FEEDING PROGRAM, 2,500.00
8/11/2010 2ND QTR 2010 CDHS-Q2 2010 EMERG. FEEDING PR 2,500.00
219086 8/31/2010 001294 ENTERPRISE SEATTLE, 20,416.67
8/12/2010 2962 CM-07/10 HEALTHCARE INNOVATION 20,416.67
219087 8/31/2010 000328 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA), 11,590.09
8/15/2010 0338710 PD-7/31-8l15/10 FUEL CHARGES 10,656.12
8/15/2010 0338710 PD-7131-8/15/10 FUEL CHARGES 933.97
219088 8/31/2010 001748 EVERSON'S ECONO-VAC INC, 19,164.88
7/13/2010 065653 SWM-07/10 MAINT/SERVICE AGO&0 19,164.88
219089 8/31/2010 011726 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS, INC, 534.35
8/3/2010 2191661 PKM-SOLENOID FOR IRRIGATION 109.23
8/5/2010 2204148 PKM-HERBICIDE 425.12
219090 8/31/2010 008939 FARRELL-MCKENNA CONSTRUCTION, 2,000.00
8/23l2010 02-73273 REFUND PW-02-73273 REFUND BARKLEY RID 1,500.00
8/23/2010 OS-01368 REFUND PVw05-01368 REFUND BARKLEY RID 500.00
219091 8/31/2010 002644 FEDERAL WAY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB, 3,250.00
7/15/2010 2ND QTR 2010 CDHS-Q2 2010 SAFE ZONE FOR KID 3,250.00
219092 S/31/2010 000229 FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER COMMERCE, 8,473.33
8/18/2010 7556 CM-07/10 BUSINESS INCUBATOR AG 8,333.33
8l31l2010 8816 CC-CHAMBER LUNCHEON COUNCIL BU 60.00
8/31/2010 8816 PW-CHAMBER LUNCHEON - BRIZENDI 20.00
8/31/2010 8816 CM-CHAMBER LUNCHEON - DOHERTY 20.00
8/31/2010 8816 MC-CHAMBER LUNCHEON FOR JUDGES 40.00
219093 8/31/2010 011222 FEDERAL WAY LIONS, 2,500.00
7/13/2010 1004 CG2010 CFW LIONS SPONSORSHIP 2,500.00
219094 8/31/2010 000876 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC, 85.60
8/9/2010 1825572 FWCC-MAINT. SUPPLIES 85.60
219095 8/31/2010 002955 FERRELLS FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO, 114.43
8l12/2010 15516 PKM-RECHARGE FIRE EXTINGUISHER 114.43
219096 8/31/2010 010305 FIRST STUDENT, 1,245.00
8/3/2010 10422234 PRCS-DAY CAMP TRIP TO DASH POI 1,245.00
219097 8/31/2010 012410 FIVE STAR ELECTRIC LLC, 208.50
8/11/2010 10-103340 REFUND CD-10-103340 REFUND OVERPAYMEN 208.50
219098 S/31/2010 004366 FLOYD EQUIPMENT COMPANY DBA, 27.97
8/20/2010 69922 PWST-CHANNEL IRON FOR FABRICAT 27.97
219099 8/31/2010 008860 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA, 1,868.56
8/18/20'10 2411832 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 1,427.88
8/12/2010 2398297 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 440.68
219100 8/31/2010 008755 FUSION, 300.00
S/9/2010 11835 DBC-RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 300.00
219101 8/31/2010 004566 G&M HONEST PERFORMANCE, 51.12
8/2/2010 137330 PKM-LOCK EASE 51.12
219102 8/31/2010 012414 GEBREMARIAN, EPHRAIM 76.66
8/4/2010 803082 PRCS-MEMBERSHIP CANCEL REFUND 76.66
219103 8/31/2010 010940 GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE CNTR, 417.21
7/27/2010 146192 PD-NEW TIRES DELIVERED TO SPAR 417.21
219104 8/31/2010 002547 GRAINGER INC, 824.68
8/4/2010 9315327610 FWCC-HOSE CLAMPS 4.69
8/2/2010 9312739874 FWCC-TILE DRILL CARBIDE TIPPED 27.02
8/2/2010 9312739882 FWCC-PULL STATION COVER, UTILI 79.29
8/2/2010 9312739882 FWCC-PULL STATION COVER, UTILI 17.45
8/3/2010 9314118929 FVVCC-LAMPS ��
8/3/2010 9314118937 FWCC-CLEAR SCOOP & ALUMINUM SC 21.31
8/3/2010 9314396798 FWCC-CEILING FAN 113.28
7/28/2010 9310080222 FWCC-ELECT. SUPPLIES 141.26
8/5/2010 9316588772 FWCC-SHOWER HEAD, DUST MOP 135.83
8/11/2010 9321571268 FWCC-RADIAL BALL BEARINGS 37.74
Bank of Americ
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invo
8/10/2010 9319857265
8/12/2010 9322643132
219105 S/31/2010 010738 GREEN EFFECTS, INC,
7/1/2010 30925
219106 8/31I2010 012427 GRUBBS, CARISSA
8/13/2010 808594
219107 8/31l2010 000671 H D FOWLER COMPANY,
8/13/2010 12775940
219108 8/31/2010 012394 HARRIS, PHYLLIS
7/27/2010 10-103147 REFUND
219109 8/31/2010 012434 HAYNES, HEIDI
8/23/2010 813320
219110 8/31/2010 011215 HD SUPPLY CONST SUPPLY LTD,
8/19/2010 30080614
219111 8/31/2010 001127 HEALTHPOINT,
7/7/2010 2ND QTR 2010
219112 8/31/2010 001487 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,
8/3/2010 48047881
8/5/2010 48057588
8/11/2010 48087608
219113 8/31/2010 012428 HIGH COUNTRY HOMES INC,
8/18/2010 05-03376 REFUND
8/18/2010 OS-03376 REFUND
219114 8l31/2010 010770 HONDA, SUSAN
8/18/2010 HONDA 2010
8/18/2010 HONDA 2010
219115 8/31/2010 003256 HURLEY ENGINEERING COMPANY,
7/28/2010 23078
219116 8/31/2010 002893 IBS, INC.,
8/6/2010 463469-1
219117 8/31/2010 000016 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS,
8/5/2010 5014701700
S!5/2010 5014701700
8/5/2010 5014701700
219118 8/31/2010 012430 INTEGRITY NETWORKS, INC,
8/19/2010 W10795-1
219119 8/31/2010 008555 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL,
8/2/2010 2788417
219120 8/31/2010 �10737 INTERWEST DEVELOPMENT NW INC,
7/30/2010 69844
219121 8/31/2010 010359 INTL UNDERCOVER TRAINING,
8/20l2010 COURSE 0228-2
219122 8/31/2010 011711 J& D PRINTING INC,
8/6/2010 46900
219123 8/31/2010 012345 J.R. HAYES & SONS, INC.,
8/16/2010 AG10-109 #1
8/16/2010 AG10-109 #1
219124 8/31/2010 009730 JACK, DRISKELL J
8/10/2010 08/10/10
219125 8/31l2010 010605 JACOBSON, ELIZABETH
8/18/2010 AUGUST 2010
219126 8/31/2010 005656 JIM'S DETAIL SHOP,
8/11/2010 13426F
219127 8/31/2010 012436 KACHMAN, STEVEN & DEANN
8/24/2010 10-103614 REFUND
219128 8/31/2010 011472 KARIVKI, PAUL
8/20/2010 08/20/10
8/17/2010 08/17/10
219129 8/31/2010 011736 KIM, CHUL JOON
8/17/2010 08/17l10
8/10/2010 08/10/10
8/20l2010 08/20/10
Description
FWCC-DRYWALL SUPPLIES
FWCC-STEEL WOOL & SCOUR PADS
FWCC-O6/10 LANDSCAPING AG08-06
PRCS-REFUND RENTAL DEPOSIT
PWST-IRRIGATION REPAIRS
CD-REFUND HANSON 10-103147
PRCS-REFUND AUGUST PAYMENT
FWCC-CAULK GUN, SHEAR HANGERS
CDHS-Q2 2010 PRIMARY DENTAL PR
IT-RR PHASE III PC-
IT-RR PHASE III LAPTOP-
IT-RR PHASE III DOCKING STATIO
PW-OS-03376 RELEASE 70% ROW BO
PW-05-03376 RELEASE 70% ROW 80
PRCS- BAKED GOODS FOR MC SHOW
PRCS-COSTCO FOOD TRAYS FOR MC
FWCC-SEAL KITS
SWM-LUBRICANT & RUST INHIBITOR
IT-08/10 ALL FAX MAINT
IT-08/10 ALL FAX MAINT
IT-OS/10 ALL FAX MAINT
IT-WIFI FIBER CAMERA EXPANSION
CD-ICC DUES WILSON #1044893
PKM-SOIL TURF BLEND
PD-SURVEILIANCE TRNG OTTO WSCJ
CM-PRNTNG OF RACK CARD/ MAP BR
PWST-PAC HWY S HOV PH IV AG10-
PWST-PAC HWY S HOV PH IV AG10-
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
PRCS-08/10 BALLROOM DANCE CLAS
PD-INTERIOR DETAIL WASH
CD-10-103614 KACHMAN OVER PMT
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-�NTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
Page 5 of 30
Amount Check Total
31.41
10529
2,15628
2,186.28
500.00
500.00
165.86
165.86
89.50
89.50
38.33
38.33
121.60
121.60
3,975.0�
3,975.00
11,105.50
6,805.43
3,682.49
617.58
15,400.00
15,705.00
305.00
94.40
13.56
80.84
695.28
698.28
127.63
127.63
173.45
8.67
86.73
78.05
5,675.90
5,675.90
35.00
35.00
60.76
60.76
500.00
500.00
4,802.09
4,802.09
133,006.42
140,006.76
-7,000.34
100.00
100.00
501.60
501.60
71.18
71.18
96.50
96.50
200.00
100.00
100.00
425.00
125.00
100.00
100.00
Bank of America Page 6 of 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
7/13/2010 07/13/10 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 100.00
219130 8/31/2010 010608 KINDERMUSIK WITH MAICA, 567.00
8/17l20T0 JULY-AUG 2010 PRCS-07/10-8/10 MUSIC CLASSES 567.00
219131 8/31/2010 000125 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION, 63.79
8/5/2010 1579144 PKM-07/10 ALGONA TS-SOLID WAST 37.80
8/16/2010 1579148 PWST-07/10 ALGONA TS-SOLID WAS 25.99
219132 8/31/2010 003374 KLINGELE, BRYAN 2,280.00
8/11/2010 KL�NGELE 2010 PD-TUITION REIMB KLINGELE 2,280.00
219133 8/31/2010 005773 KOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION, 676.09
7/6/2010 2ND QTR 2010 CDHS-Q2 2010 WE ARE FAMILY PRO 676.09
219134 8l31I2010 001456 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC, 8,011.02
6/24/2010 256924 PD-LIDAR UNITS-PRO LITE WTSC G 7,884.00
6/24l2010 256924 Freight 127.02
219135 8/31/2010 000096 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT, 1,574.30
8/13/2010 2049903 PKM-04/10-06/10 31531 1ST AVE 18.52
8/13l2010 2832301 PKM-04/10-06/10 30619 16TH AVE 18.04
8/13/2010 2984001 PKM-04/10-6/10 31850 7TH AVE S 18.04
8/13/2010 3278301 PWST-O5/10-07/1/10 32009 23RD 38.31
8/13/2010 3336101 PWST-OS/10-07l2/10 3336101 PAC 379.52
8/13/2010 3364101 PWST-O5/10-07/2/10 1618 S 288T 112.97
8/13/2010 3488801 PWST-OS/10-07/2/10 31802 21 ST 18.52
8/13/2010 3540201 PWST-O5/10-07/10 29627 PAC HWY 212.42
8/13/2010 3540301 PWST-05/10-07/10 28719 PAC HWY 20.69
8/13J2010 3545101 PWST-05/10-07/10 291A2 PAC HWY 90.02
8/13/2010 460602 PKM-5/10-07l2/10 2645 312TH ST 199.79
8/13/2010 460602 PKM-5/10-07/Z/10 2645 312TH ST 105.31
8/13/2010 482303 PWST-05/10-07/2/10 28866 PAC H 40.52
8/20/2010 3088801 PWST-OS/10-07/10 2000 312TH ST 253.11
8/20/2010 3200201 PWST-OS/10-07/10 32002 32RD AE 18.52
219136 8/31/2010 004052 LEED,
8/14/2010 08161004
219137 8/31/2010 009531 LEHNERTZ, LARRY
8/23/2010 AUGUST 18, 2010
219138 8/31/2010 010672 LESNENKO, SERGEY
8/20/2010 02-71429 REFUND
8/20/2010 02-71429 REFUND
219139 8/31/2010 011909 LEXISNEXIS RISK,
7/31/2010 1470204-20100731
219140 8/31/2010 011393 LISITSYN, OLEG
8/24/2010 02-70776 REFUND
8/24/2010 02-70776 REFUND
219141 8l31/2010 000630 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC,
S/9/2010 142418
S/10/2010 142439
8/10/2010 142441
7/20/2010 141819
7/20l2010 141819
7/12/2010 141538
7/12/2010 141545
219142 S/31/2010 005339 LOWE'S HIW INC,
6l11/2010 14183
7l28/2010 02781
7/28/2010 02781
7/28/2010 02781
8/2/2010 01322
8/2/2010 01327
8/3/2010 02853
8/10/2010 14310
8/10/2010 14339
8/10/2010 14339
S/11/2010 02933
S/12/2010 01862
8/12/2010 23927
PD-DUTY BELT FOR MCCONNELL
PRCS-SUMMER SOUNDS PERFORMANCE
PW-02-71429 ROW REFUND LESNENK
PW-02-69000 ROW REFUND SEMESHC
PD-06l10-07/10 LEXISNEXIS SVC
PW-02-70776 ROW REFUND LISITSY
PW-02-70776 ROW REFUND LISITSY
SWM-GRAVEL
SWM-TOPSOIL FOR LAURELWOOD
SWM-GRAVEL FOR LAURELWOOD
SWAA-DRY FILL & CRUSH GRAVEL
SWM-DRY FILL & CRUSH GRAVEL
PKM-SAG FOOTBALL FIELD SOD
PKM-DUMP SOD
PKM-REFRIDGERATOR - BALANCE DU
PKM-COFFEE MAKER
SWM-COFFEE MAKER
PWST-COFFEE MAKER
PKM-CONCRETE/REBAR PICNIC BENC
DBC-EXTERIOR LIGHT REPAIRS
DBC-EXTERIOR LIGHT REPAIRS
PWTR-DRIVE PIN, LUMBER CRAYON
FWCC-CABLE, TILEX, MISC SUPPLI
FWCC-CABLE, TILEX, MISC SUPPLI
CHB-CHAMBER PROJECT SUPPLIES
CHB-MISC TOOLS
CHB-CHAMBER PROJECT SUPPLIES
207.12
207.12
550.00
550.00
269.50
300.00
-30.50
941.70
941.70
599.50
630.00
-30.50
2,966.04
232.25
312.35
2,094.47
104.19
128.70
51.11
42.97
1,695.34
359.04
66.91
58.05
58.05
187.03
153.98
42.35
22.16
10.74
69.82
9.49
21.18
38.71
Bank of A merica
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice
8/13/2010 02308
8/t6/2010 02603
8/16/2010 02650
8/16/2010 14390
8/16/2010 14396
8/17/2010 02853
8/5l2010 01504
8/9/2010 02730
S/5/2010 14675
8/18/2010 14949
8/18/2010 14949
8/18/2010 15924
219143 8/31/2010 700156 MACDONALD MILLER SERVICE INC,
8/5l2010 SVC006543
219144 8/31/2010 001004 MAILMEDIA DBA IMMEDIA,
8/10/2010 60182
219145 8/31I2010 009433 MAKSIMOV, YURI
Sl17/2010 08/17/10
8/10/2010 08/10/10
219146 8/31/2010 009408 MANCHIK, YURI
7/27/2010 10-102986 REFUND
7/27l2010 10-102986 REFUND
7/27/2010 10-102986 REFUND
219147 8/31/2010 005406 MAYBERRY, MITCHEL
8/16/2010 SUMMER 2010
219148 8/31/2010 012420 MCCLEAVE, KOLYA
8/19/2010 MCCLEAVE 2010
219149 8/31/2010 011977 MCLENDON HARDWARE INC,
8/17/2010 410888/3
8/17/2010 410902/3
219150 8/31/2010 006008 MCLOUGHLIN & EARDLEY CORP,
S/5/2010 0113045-IN
219151 S/31/2010 010256 MCMASTER-CARR,
S/12/2010 62544777
8/2/2010 61537466
8/2/2010 61537466
219152 8/31/2010 005176 MERINO STRAWE, BETTY
8/10/2010 OS/10/10
8/17/2010 08/17/10
219153 8/31/2010 001793 MICROFLEX INC,
8/6/2010 00019453
219154 8/31l2010 009799 MLA ENGINEERING, PLLC,
8/10/2010 1531
219155 S/31/2010 008029 MONTES DE OCA RICKS, MARIA
8/20/2010 08l20/10
219156 8l31/2010 002014 MOORE WALLACE,
7/19/2010 995130379
219'157 8/31l2010 011965 MORRISON, BARRY RICHARD
7/21/2010 JULY 21, 2010
8/10/2010 AUGUST 10, 2010
219158 S/31/2010 010539 NARANBAATAR, KHULAN
7/22/2010 07/22/10
219159 8/31/2010 005561 NATIONAL TACTICAL OFFICER'S,
8/16/2010 295111 SUMPTER
219160 8/31/2010 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPANY,
8/16/2010 248790
8l17/2010 248806
8/17/2010 248807
8/17/2010 248816
8/17/2010 248819
S/17/2010 248820
8/13/2010 248755
Description
PKM-CORK TILES FOR FRENCH LAKE
PKM-IRRIGATION REPAIRS PALISAD
CHB-KILZ UPSHOT AEROSOL
SWM-WASP & HORNET SPRAY
SWM-WASP & HORNET SPRAY
CHB-HOME PEST PLUS SPRAY
PKM-STLK COMPACT FRIDIGAIRE
PKM-BATH FAN
SWM-SHRINK WRAP
FWCC-DRAWER LINER, SOAP DISH,
FWCC-DRAWER LINER, SOAP DISH,
PD-SOU BIKE CHAINS
CHB-REPAIR CARRIER CONDENSING
PRCS-2010 AUTUMN REC BROCHURE
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
CD-10-102986 MUNCHIK REFUND
CD-10-102986 MUNCHIK REFUND
CD-10-102986 MUNCHIK REFUND
PRCS-MARTIAL ARTS CLASSES AG09
CDHS-07/10-08/10 REIMB MCCLEAV
PKM-FRENCH LAKE PARK KIOSK INV
PKM-DAIS STEP REPAIR INV#41902
PD-SIREN CONTROL CENTER
FWCGCHAIR, CANE & CRUTCH TIPS
FWCC-COMPRESSION TUBE FILLING
FWCC-COMPRESSION TUBE FILLING
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
FI-07/10 TAX AUDIT PRQG.
PKM-EVALUATION OF LIGHT POLES
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
FI-TIME SHEETS
CM-07/10 CONFLICT DEFENDER AG1
CM-08/10 CONFLICT DEFENDER AG1
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
PD-NTOA DUES K SUMPTER
PKM-DOCK/SIGN REPAIRS
FWCC-MISC SCREWS/BOLTS, STAIN,
PWST-PAINT,MASK,PAINT SUPPLIES
PWST-PAI N T
PWST-SUNRISE SPRAY, MISC HARDW
PKM-SHOP & SIGN SUPPLIES
SWM-ARMOR ALL & TIRE FOAM
Page 7 of 30
Amount Check Total
89.09
33.89
21.60
3.25
6.50
6.54
152.21
86.51
44.63
26.59
59.29
67.73
1,759.67
1,759.67
1,246.61
1,246.61
250.00
150.00
100.00
50.00
3.00
3.00
74.00
1,155.60
1,185.60
110.01
110.01
84.67
65.56
19.11
377.35
377.35
52.88
36.50
6.57
9.81
325.00
150.00
175.00
210.73
210.73
484.20
484.20
100.00
100.00
365.99
365.99
500.00
250.00
250.00
100.00
100.00
40.00
40.00
1,468.54
47.18
224.37
90.61
3.93
67.39
22.57
11.31
Bank of Am
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invo
8/10/2010 248632
8/10/2010 248644
8/10l2010 248645
8/10l2010 248658
8/10/2010 248665
8l10/2010 248667
8l12/2010 248724
8/11/2010 248671
8/11I2010 248674
8/11/2010 248680
8/11/2010 248682
8!9/2010 248607
8!9/2010 248608
8/9l2010 248617
8/9/2010 248618
8/5/2010 248515
8/18/2010 248836
8/30/2010 248435
7/21/2010 248067
6/30/2010 247459
8/3/2010 248447
8/3/201� 248453
8/4l2010 248469
8/4/2010 248472
8/4/2010 248503
219161 8/31/2010 003138 NORMED,
8/5/2010 12378-593113
219162 8/31/2010 001391 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY,
S/5/2010 S3527966.001
8/3/2010 S3522994.001
8/3/2010 S3524698.001
7/30/2010 S3518079.001
219163 8/31/2010 005493 NORTHWEST EMBROIDERY INC,
7/29/2010 63766
219164 8/31l2010 010621 NORTHWEST PERMIT INC,
8l11/2010 10-103249 REFUND
8/11/2010 10-103249 REFUND
8/11/2010 10-103249 REFUND
8/24l2010 10-103505 REFUND
8/24/2010 10-t03505 REFUND
8/24/2010 10-103505 REFUND
219165 8/31/2010 011414 OFFICE DEPOT,
8/4l2010 1241461470
219166 8/31/2010 004292 OLYMPIC SECURITY SERVICES INC,
7/31/2010 SI+0023963
219167 S/31/2010 011651 OMAR, ABDULLAHI
S/20/2010 08/20/10
219168 8/31/2010 004494 ONSET COMPUTER CORPORATION,
7/26l2010 52649
219169 8/31/2010 007444 ORCA PACIFIC INC,
7l29/2010 045156
8/5/2010 045320
219170 8/31/2010 000504 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER,
8/5/2010 43652
219171 8/31/2010 005741 OUTCOMES BY LEVY,
7/31/2010 JULY 2010
219172 8/31/2010 011805 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION,
8/17/2010 AZ7955
8/17/2010 AZ7955
8/17/2010 AZ7955
8/17/2010 AZ7955
8/17/2010 AZ7955
8/17/2010 AZ7955
Description
PWST-SWIVEL CONNECTOR, MISC SU
SWM-CAPS FOR GAS CAN/HERBISIDE
PWST-EXT CORD, MISC SUPPLIES
PKM-BRIDGE REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWFLT-MISC SUPPLIES FOR FLAIL
PKM-BRIDGE REPAIR SUPPLIES
SWM-MISC SCREWS/BOLTS
PWST-LUMBER
PKM-GRAFFITI CLEAN UP PAINT
SWM-PLASTIC TOOL BOX & KEY
PKM-NUTS/BOLTS FOR BRIDGE REPA
PWST-DRYWALL
FWCC-MILDEW REMOVER, LIQUID NA
PWST-LUMBER
PWST-MAIL BOX, LUMBER, MISC SU
PKM-GORIILA TAPE, YELLOW JACKE
PWST-S 288TH PLUMBING REPAIRS
PWST-BLK PAINT
SWM-1/2 DR 10:" EXTENSION
PWST-HAMMER RIP, ROOFING MATER
PKM-TIRE SEALER, RAGS, SANDPAP
PKM-SPRAYER CP
PWST-BLK PAINT
PKM-FIELD PAINT CP
PWST-FENCE TIE
PD-REFILL FIRST AID KITS
DBC-MOTION SEN. KIT
DBC-ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
DBGELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
DBC-ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
PD-PSSA GROSSNICKLE UNIFORM
CD-10-103249 DUPLICATE PMT
CD-10-103249 DUPLICATE PMT
CD-10-103249 DUPLICATE PMT
CD-NW PERMIT REFUND DUPLICATE
CD-NW PERMIT REFUND DUPLICATE
CD-NW PERMIT REFUND DUPLICATE
SWR-BUSINESS RECYCLE HANDOUT
MC-07/10 COURT SECURITY AG09-1
MC-INTERPRETER SVC (TELEPHONIC
SWM-WATER QUALITY TESTING EQUI
FWCC-POOL CHEMICALS MAINT AG09
FWCC-POOL CHEMICALS MAINT AG09
PKM-GAS CAP FOR TILLER INV#436
CM-07l10 LOBBYIST SVCS AG03-19
IT-B/W COPIER GROUP KIT AG09-2
IT-B/W COPIER GROUP KIT AG09-2
IT-B/W COPIER GROUP KIT AG09-2
IT-B/W COPIER GROUP KIT AG09-2
IT-B!W COPIER GROUP KIT AG09-2
IT-B/W COPIER GROUP KIT AG09-2
Page 8 of 30
Amount Check Total
6.88
4.68
10.62
98.47
18.90
37.73
4.61
13.74
118.11
26.44
117.59
4.72
24.79
4.56
23.42
62.92
42.85
13.27
11.82
53.09
25.58
14.75
3.93
251.83
5.88
119.19
119.19
341.19
52.94
78.12
186.15
23.98
80.97
80.97
154.00
3.00
3.00
71.00
3.00
3.00
71.00
32.89
32.89
2,662.80
2,662.80
50.00
50.00
977.00
977.00
1,617.13
821.42
795.71
12.79
12.79
4,478.92
4,478.92
10,839.38
47.40
47.40
284.40
189.60
995.40
616.20
B ank of America Page 9 of 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
8/17/2010 AZ7955 IT-B/W COPIER GROUP KIT AG09-2 995.40
8/17/2010 AZ7955 IT-B/W COPIER GROUP KIT AG09-2 521.40
8/17/2010 AZ7955 IT-B/W COPIER GROUP KIT AG09-2 47.40
8l17/2010 AZ7955 IT-B/W COPIER GROUP KIT AG09-2 995.40
8/18/2010 AZ9273 IT-06l10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 34.17
8/18/2010 AZ9273 IT-06/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 34.17
8/18/2010 AZ9273 IT-06/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 205.03
8/18/2010 AZ9273 IT-06/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 136.69
8/18/2010 AZ9273 IT-06/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 717.61
8/18/2010 AZ9273 IT-06/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 444.24
8/18/2010 AZ9273 IT-06/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 717.61
8/18I2010 AZ9273 IT-06/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 375.89
8/18/2010 AZ9273 IT-06/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 34.17
8/18/2010 AZ9273 IT-06/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 717.63
8/18/2010 AZ9315 IT-07/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 26.82
8/18/2010 AZ9315 IT-07/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 26.82
8/18/2010 AZ9315 IT-07/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 160.93
S/18/2010 AZ9315 IT-07/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 107.29
8l18/2010 AZ9315 IT-07/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 563.26
8/18/2010 AZ9315 IT-07/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 348.68
8/18/2010 AZ9315 IT-07/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 563.26
8/18/2010 AZ9315 IT-07/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 295.04
8/18/2010 AZ9315 IT-07/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 26.82
8/18/2010 AZ9315 IT-07/10 PRINTER/COPIER MAINT 56325
219173 8/31/2010 001814 pARAMETRiX INC, 60,096.65
8/11/2010 03-49238 PWST-07/10 HOV PH IV CONSTRUCT 60,096.65
219174 8/3112010 012007 PARK CHENAUR & ASSOCIATES INC, 250.00
8/6/2010 AUGUST 6. 2010 CM-07/10 CONFLICT DEFENDER AG1 250.00
219175 8/31/2010 012424 PARK, SUZIE
219176 8l31/2010
219177 8/31I2010
219178 8/31/2010
219179 8/31/2010
219180 8/31 /2010
219181 8/31/2010
219182 8l31/2010
6/22/2010 783371
000885 PARKER PAINT MANUFACTURING CO,
8/10/2010 022004485
8/24/2010 022004850
012417 PATTON, IINDSEY
snvzoio ao�aso
006656 PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES INC,
8/10/2010 OA024414
010613 PETEK, PHD, THOMAS C
7/31/2010 7837
002557 PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS MAINT,
8/25/2010 PKM-8/25/10
8/25/2010 PKM-8/25/10
8l25/2010 PKM-8/25l10
8/25/2010 PKM-8/25/10
011780 PETTY CASH-MC CHANGE FUND,
8/17/2010 MC-8/17/10
8/17/2010 MC-8/17/10
006241 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT,
8/23/2010 PD-S/23/10
8/23/2010 PD-8/23/10
8/23/2010 PD-8/23/10
8/23/2010 PD-8/23110
8/23/2010 PD-8/23/10
8/23/2010 PD-8/23/10
8/23/2010 PD-8/23/10
8/23l2010 PD-8/23l10
8/23/2010 PD-8/23/10
S/23/2010 PD-8/23/10
8/23/2010 PD-8/23/10
8/23/2010 PD-8/23/10
8/23/2010 PD-8/23l10
8/23/2010 PD-8/23/10
8/23/2010 PD-8/23/10
PRCS-REFUND PICNIC RENTAL FEE
CD-PAINT SUPPLIES
CD-PAINT SUPPLIES
PRCS-CANCEL CLASS REFUND
PD-K9 SUPPLIES
PD-RETURN TO DUTY EVAL
PKM-WATER&GATORADE FOR CREW DO
PKM-ZIP PORTFOLIO FOR IRRIGATI
PKM-PARKS AND REC COMMISSION 8
PKM-04/10-06l10 REIMB WRIGHT
MC- STAFF TRAINING/RETREAT 7/1
MC-JURY FOOD 8!4/10
PD-FUEL:VEHICLE #6153 BETH MES
PD-CIS INVESTIGATIONS INTERVIE
PD-REPLACE DAMAGED K9LEAD:M
PD-RADAR GUN BATTERIES :PAM HA
PD-DT FIRST-AID KIT:PAM HALL
PD-2-WAY RADIOS:ECAT
PD-WATER FOR OFFICERS ON SHOOT
PD-TERRY HOCH RETIREMENT - LYN
PD-CALEA CONF LAURIE JACKSON S
PD-CALEA CONF L JACKSON BAGGAG
PD-CALEA CONF L JACKSON BAGGAG
PD-BUILD THE BRIDGE MEETING:LI
PD-VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION COFFE
PD-FUEL FOR VEHICLE #6033 FOR
PD-BRIDGE TOLL OFFICER ASHLEY
70.00
70.00
65.46
22.10
43.36
267.76
267.76
60.17
60.17
250.00
250.00
178.93
25.62
38.31
75.00
40.00
49.90
39.91
9.99
532.83
5.00
7.50
24.02
51.05
5.44
39.40
10.58
81.85
36.00
20.00
20.00
6.49
73.65
20.00
4.00
Ban of America
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice
8/23/2010 PD-8/23/10
8/23/2010 PD-8/23/10
8/23/2010 PD-8/23/10
219183 8/31/2010 003537 PIERCE COUNTY SECURITY INC,
8/4/2010 212745
8/4/2010 212997
8/4/2010 213053
8/4/2010 213099
8/4l2010 213142
8/4/2010 213144
S/4/2010 213191
8/4/2010 213195
8/4l2010 213256
219184 8/31/2010 005941 PIONEER MANUFACTURING CO,
8/3/2010 INV378252
8/3/2010 INV378252
219185 8/31/2010 000808 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY,
8/12/2010 8147635
219186 8/31/2010 001411 POSTAL EXPRESS INC,
7/31l2010 BM10071004
7/31/2010 BM10071004
7/31/2010 BM10071004
7/31/2010 BM10071004
7/31/2010 BM10071004
7/31/2010 BM10071004
219187 8/31l2010 011880 POWERS & ASSOCIATES INC,
8/25/2010 AUGUST 25, 2010
219188 8/31/2010 005583 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC,
8!6/2010 37261119
7/27/2010 37163239
219189 8/31/2010 012361 PROVIDENCE COMMUNITY,
7/31/2010 JULY 2010
219190 8/31/2010 005345 PUGET POSTINGS,
8/9/2010 2209
219191 8/31I2010 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC,
8/9/2010 131-066-1002
8/17/2010 250-275-0389
8/17/2010 004-919-1000
8/17/2010 004-919-1000
219192 8/31/2010 000990 PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL,
7/15/2010 201129
219193 8/31/2010 000533 PUGET SOUND SPECIALTIES INC,
8/10/2010 22086
219194 8/31/2010 012423 PULITANO, BEBE
7/29/2010 800399
219195 8l31/2010 012435 RENAUD, DEBRA
8/23/2010 813323
219196 8/31/2010 005508 SAFAROVA-DOWNEY, ALMIRA
8/20/2010 08/20/10
219197 8/31/2010 003726 SAFEWAY STORE #1555,
8/11l2010 1991453
8/13/2010 1991459
8/6/2010 1990698
8/5/2010 1990694
7/30/2010 1990686
7/15/2010 1990677
219198 8/31/2010 011764 SBS LEASING PROG. OF DE LAGE,
8/7/2010 6832527
219199 8/31/2010 004811 SEATTLE STERLING MACK,
8/10/2010 CS81851
219200 8/31l2010 012422 SEATTLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL LAW,
8l19/20'10 DEYO REGISTER
Description
PD-EXTRA KEYS FOR BELLY CHAIN
PD-COFFEE:VOLUNTEER RECOGNITIO
PD-EARPLUGS FOR FIREARMS TRAIN
PRCS-07/10 SECURITY SVC AT CP
PKM-07/10 PARK CLOSING SECURIT
PKM-07/10 PARK CLOSING SECURIT
PKM-07/10 PARK CLOSING SECURIT
PKM-07/10 PARK CLOSIfJG SECURIT
PKM-07/10 PARK CLOSING SECURIT
PKM-07l10 PARK CLOSING SECURIT
PKM-07/10 PARK CLOSING SECURIT
PKM-07/10 PARK CLOSING SECURIT
PKM-FIELD PAINT CELEBRATION PA
PKM-FIELD PAINT FOR MISC PARKS
PKM-LIGHT BALLAST INV#2147635
CHB/PD/MC-07/10 COURIER SVC AG
CHB/PD/MC-07/10 COURIER SVC AG
CHB/PD/MC-07/10 COURIER SVC AG
CHB/PDlMC-07/10 POSTAGE CHRS A
CHB/PD/MC-07/10 POSTAGE CHRS A
CHB/PD/MC-07/10 POSTAGE CHRS A
LAW-ECONOMIC STRATEGIES STUDY.
PWST-DEMAND CHARGE CYLINDERS
PKM-REFILL CO2 FOR FIELD
PD-07/10 SCRAM, EM BASIC - IND
MC-2010/2011 JURY SOURCE LIST
PWTR-07/10 NON-METERED ELECT
PWfR-07/10 106 SW CAMPUS DR. U
SWM-07/10 324 STORAGE B0249197
SWM-07/10 9TH AVE FLOOD GATES
CC-PSRC 2010 DUES ASSESSMENT
PKM-FIELD MARKING CHALK INV#22
PRCS-REFUND PASS CANCELLED
PRCS-REFUND AUGUST PAYMENT
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
PRCS-WILD 8 CRAZY WEEK SUPPLIE
PRCS-F DUB SPORTS NIGHT SUPPLI
PRCS-LEWIS & CLARK SUPPLIES
PRCS-LEWIS & CLARK SUPPLIES
PRCS-F DUB KARAOKE SUPPLIES
PRCS-WHIDBEY ILAND TRIP SUPPLI
IT-08/10 CD COPIER RPR, MNT, S
PWFLT-MAINT SUPPLIES
PO-DV SYMPOSIUM REGISTER D DEY
Page 10 of 30
Amount Check Total
10.90
97.30
19.65
2,365.50
940.50
150.00
250.00
150.00
250.00
150.00
775.00
150.00
150.00
2,648.00
1,324.00
1,324.00
20.09
20.09
5,859.28
1,404.86
299.70
168.59
2,036.90
1,202.46
746.77
20,000.00
20,000.00
74.55
46.17
28.38
884.00
884.00
492.75
492.75
16,505.53
16,003.48
120.82
339.85
41.38
26,738.00
26,738.00
519.03
519.03
61.58
61.58
11.58
11.58
100.00
100.00
155.32
21.47
23.61
19.05
23.61
25.73
41.85
109.92
109.92
143.88
143.88
60.00
60.00
Bank of A merica Page 11 of 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description A mount Check Total
2t9201 8/31/2010 010127 SEMESHCHUK, PETR 672.27
8/20/2010 02-69000 REFUND PW-02-69000 ROW REFUND SEMESHC 702.77
8l20/2010 02-69000 REFUND PW-02-69000 ROW REFUND SEMESNC -30.50
219202 8/31/2010 009260 SGS GLASS COMPANY INC, 932.94
8/12/2010 9073 FWCC-REPLACE TEMPERED GLASS 466.47
8I12/2010 9073 FWCC-REPLACE TEMPERED GLASS 466.47
219203 8/31l2010 001480 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO, 97.00
8l18/2010 9582-G FWCC-FACILITIES PAINT SUPPLIES 97.00
219204 8/31/2010 012415 SIMS, JESSICA 76.66
8/12/2010 807889 FWCC-EARLY CANCEL REFUND 50.00
8/5/2010 803752 FWCC-MEMBERSHIP CANCEL REFUND 26.66
219205 8/31/2010 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 350.00
7/31/2010 309394 FWCC-07/10 FWM BANNER WEB AD 350.00
219206 8/31/2010 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 275.00
7/31/2010 309442 SWR-07/10 WEB BANNER AD 275.00
219207 8/31l2010 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 359.78
7l31/2010 389167 CD-ST LUKE ADDITION LEGAL NOTI 86.52
7/17/2010 384843 CD-CODE AMENDMENT LEGAL NOTICE 69.22
7/3/2010 381755 CD-CODE REVISION MTG LEGAL NOT 67.05
7/7/2010 382190 CD-MITCHELL HEARING LEGAL NOTI 136.99
219208 8/31/2010 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 90.85
7/10/2010 383055 HRCK-ORDINANCE 10-644 LEGAL AD 43.26
7/24/2010 386888 HRCK-ORDINANCE 10-655 LEGAL AD 47.59
219209 8/31/2010 001885 SPARKS CAR CARE, 1,529.76
8/6/2010 26430 PD-LOF 39.08
S/5/2010 26422 PD-LOF 34.99
8!5/2010 26423 PD-LOF 48.28
8/5/2010 26423 PD-ELECTRICAL WORK 29.08
8/9/2010 26428 PD-ALIGNMENT 49.28
8/9/2010 26428 PD-BRAKE SERVICE 665.10
8/9/2010 26428 PD-TIRE REPAIR 19.71
8/9/2010 26428 PD-TRANSMISSION 100.32
8/9/2010 26428 PD-LOF 34.99
8/12/2010 26451 PD-INSPECT TIRES & WHEELS 56.94
8/11/2010 26445 PD-OLF 34.99
8/17/2010 26481 PD-BATTERY 220.26
8/19/2010 26496 PD-OLF 39.08
8/19/2010 26501 PD-REPAIR AIRBAG INDICATOR LIG 157.66
219210 8/31/2010 007186 SPECIAL INTEREST TOWING, 175.2C
7/31/2010 133565 PD-VEHICLE TOW SVC 175.20
219211 8/31/2010 004701 SPRINT,
8/18/2010 796588811-033
219212 8/31/2010 007438 SPRINT/ROTHHAMMER INT'L,
8/5/2010 68777A
219213 8/31/2010 011550 ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PARISH,
8/24/2010 02-74484 REFUND
8/24/2010 02-74484 REFUND
219214 8/31/2010 011356 STRATEGIES 360, INC,
8/5/2010 772-2997
8/5/2010 772-2997
8/5/2010 772-2997
219215 8/31/2010 000308 SUBURBAN CITIES ASSOCIATION,
7/26/2010 1702
219216 8/31/2010 012419 SUDDEN IMPACT GIRLS FASTPITCH,
8/23/2010 JUNE 2010
219217 S/31/2010 003896 SUMMIT LAW GROUP,
8/19l2010 AG10-131 #1
8/17/2010 47637
219218 8/31/2010 007710 SUPERIOR LINEN SERVICE,
8/9/2010 94400
8/16/2010 96369
8/23/2010 98345
IT-OS/10 DATA CELLULAR
FWCC-AQUATIC GOGGLES
PW-02-74484 ROW REFUND ST. VIN
PW-02-74484 ROW REFUND ST. VIN
CM-08/10 FEDERAL LOBBYIST AG09
CM-O8110 FEDERAL LOBBYIST AG09
CM-08/10 FEDERAL LOBBYIST AG09
CC-JULY 2010 SCA NETWORKING DI
CM-TOURISM ENHANCEMENT GRANT F
LAW-GUILD NEGOTIATION LEGAL SV
LAV1hGUILD NEGOTIATION LEGAL SV
DBC-LINEN SERVICE
DBC-LINEN SERVICE
DBC-LINEN SERVICE
2,880.14
2,880.14
844.12
844.12
666.10
696.60
-30.50
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
-5,000.00
43.00
43.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
8,795.00
8,750.00
45.00
136.39
16.72
16.72
16.72
Bank of Ame rica
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date
8/20/2010 S97384
219219 8/31l2010 009523 SYSTEMS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY,
8/10J2010 14609
S/9/2010 14584
219220 8/31/2010 007756 TAB PRODUCTS CO LLC,
8/17/2010 1937977
219221 8/31/2010 001187 TECHNOLOGY EXPRESS,
8/6/2010 166602
8/11/2010 166637
8/11 /2010 166637
S/11/2010 166637
8/11/2010 166637
219222 8/31/2010 005156 TELEDYNE ISCO INC,
8/2/2010 932488
219223 8/31/2010 009789 TERMINIX,
7/26/2010 297153251
219224 8/31I2010 012425 TESSIER, ISABEL
8/17/2010 810512
8/19/2010 810513
S/18/2010 811042
219225 8/31/2010 009936 THE ACTIVE NETWORK,
7l31/2010 11016206
7/31/2010 11016406
219226 8/31/2010 001424 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR INC,
8!1/2010 596965
219227 8/31/2010 004218 TIMCOINC,
7/28/2010 202037
7l28/2010 202037
7/28/2010 202037
219228 8/31I2010 012402 TOMAHAWK LIVE TRAP LLC,
8/2/2010 T-176587
219229 8/31/2010 008902 TRI-CITY MEATS,
8/18/2010 236444
8/11/2010 236259
8/6/2010 236149
8/9/2010 236194
219230 8/31/2010 005549 TRINH, JAMES
8/10/2010 OS/10l10
8/17/2010 08/17l10
8/20/2010 08/20/10
7/20/2010 07/20/10
219231 8l31/2010 006872 TRUSCO MFG CO,
S/3/2010 8951
219232 8/31/2010 012429 TUNCAK, KUTAY
sizoi2o�o osizoiio
219233 8/31/2010 002426 UNITED GROCERS CASH & CARRY,
8/19/2010 191890
8/19/2010 192062
8l21/2010 192558
8/22/2010 192859
8/23/2010 193063
8/23/2010 193115
8/23/2010 193198
8/23/2010 193198
8/18/2010 191570
8/18/2010 191605
8/17/2010 191306
8/14/2010 190500
8/12/2010 189804
S/6/2010 188069
8/8/2010 188728
219234 8/31/2010 003837 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE,
Invoice Description
DBC-LINEN SERVICE
PD-REPLC CENCOM AMPAND
PD-TROUBLESHOOT SIREN CONTROLL
MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES
IT-RR HP LASERJET 9050DN PRINT
IT-BARRACUDA MESSAGE ARCHIVER
IT-BARRACUDA MESSAGE ARCHIVER
IT-BARRACUDA MESSAGE ARCHIVER
IT-BARRACUDA MESSAGE ARCHIVER
SWM-LOW PROFILE VELOCITY SENSO
PKM-7/26/10 PEST CONTROL
PRCS-WITHDRAW REFUND
PRCS-WITHDRAW REFUND
PRCS-WITHDRAW REFUND
FWCC-DATA CARDS
FWCC-ORBIT SCANNER POWER SUPPL
FWCC-08/10-10/10 ELEVATOR MAIN
PWST/SWM-PIPE COUPLINGS, HOSES
PWST/SWM-PIPE COUPLINGS, HOSES
PWSTlSWM-PIPE COUPLINGS, HOSES
PD-SLIDING DOG CAT CAGE
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
PKM-PAINT SPRAYER PARTS
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
PRCS-SPECIAL OLYMPICS SUPPLIES
PRCS-SPECIAL OLYMPICS SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES
Page 12 of 30
Amount Check Total
86.23
172.60
86.30
86.30
962.67
962.67
25,882.82
7,346.66
8,334.70
5, 556.47
2,786.99
1,858.00
1,045.73
1,045.73
112.79
112.79
643.12
153.64
402.18
87.30
1,214.36
1,077.48
136.88
681.55
681.55
429.86
143.28
143.28
143.30
64.40
64.40
953.95
521.44
178.89
175.00
78.62
400.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
59.91
59.91
100AC
100.00
1,363.87
128.06
104.40
129.43
41.85
206.98
46.88
47.14
69.09
26.01
23.97
118.90
38.87
20.63
67.80
293.86
1.07
Bank of America
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice
8/14/2010 OOOOF80F48330
219235 8l31/2010 012316 UNSWORTH, RAYMOND A
8/11l2010 UNSWORTH 2O10
219236 8/31/2010 011540 US POSTMASTER,
S/24/2010 10-29625
219237 8/31l2010 001805 VADIS NORTHWEST,
7/31/2010 17042
7/31/2010 17042
219238 8/31/2010 003563 VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER,
8/16/2010 0011341
219239 8/31/2010 000094 WA STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE,
8/9/2010 L84592
219240 S/31/2010 000567 WA STATE DEPT OF ECOLOGY,
8/2/2010 2001-DSKI101754
8/2/2010 2011-DSKI101747
8/2/2010 2011-DSKI101767
219241 8/31/2010 004258 WA STATE DEPT OF LICENSING,
7/29/2010 AUGUST 31, 2010
219242 Sl31/2010 003825 WA STATE DEPT OF TRANSPORTATN,
8/10/2010 RE-313-ATB00810056
219243 8/31/2010 003525 WA STATE DEPT OF TRANSPORTATN,
S/10/2010 RE 41 JA7053 L005
219244 8/31/2010 001379 WA STATE L&I ELEVATOR SECTION,
8/5/2010 116406
219245 8/31I2010 000851 WA STATE PATROL,
8/3/2010 111000399
8/3/2010 111000720
219246 8/31/2010 000537 WACE-WA ASSOC CODE ENFORCEMENT,
8/24/2010 KEIRSEY DUES
8/24/2010 LEMKE DUES
8/24/2010 VAUSE DUES
219247 8/3U2010 006007 WALKER ACE HARDWARE,
7/29/2010 005467
219248 8l31l2010 000343 WASHDUP, LLC,
7/31l2010 80
219249 8/31/2010 012418 WASHINGTON ALARM INC,
8/13/201� 10-103276 REFUND
8/13/2010 10-103276 REFUND
8/13/2010 10-103276 REFUND
219250 8/31/2010 000783 WASTE MANAGEMENT,
9/1/2010 1056287-1055-7
219251 8/31/2010 001241 WEST COAST AWARDS,
8/10/2010 48454
219252 8l31/2�10 000173 WEST PAYMENT CENTER,
8/1/2010 821052784
8/1/2010 821109224
219253 S/31/2010 000541 WESTERN EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS,
7/23/2010 641528
219254 8/31/2010 011523 WHOLESALE SPORTS,
8l12/2010 150-00040
8/19/2010 150-00041
219255 S/31/2010 002204 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY,
8/11l2010 4889495 RI
8/2/2010 4868986 RI
8/3/2010 4871102 RI
219256 8/31/2010 005680 WILD WEST INTERNATIONAL LLC,
7/31/2010 6036
219257 8/31/2010 010720 WILDER, SAMANTHA
8/6/2010 WECFW24
219258 8/31/2010 012426 WILSON, DARI
8/13l2010 808754
8/13/2010 808755
Description
IT-UPS TO VECTOR CORP.
PD-TUITION REIMB UNSWORTH
SWR-RECYCLE EVENT MAILERS POST
SWR-07/10 LITTER CONTROL AG07-
SWR-07l10 LITTER CONTROL AG07-
PD-08l10 MDT USER FEE
FI-07/10 STATE AUDITOR SVCS
SWM-DAM SAFETY FEE FOR KITTS C
SWM-DAM SAFETY FEE FOR PANTHER
SWM-DAM SAFETY FEE FOR S 336TH
PD-08/10 REMIT CPL FEES
PWST-07/10 S 320TH OFF RAMP AG
PWST-SR99/SR161/352ND EXT REVI
CHB-ELEVATOR OPERATING PERMIT
HR-07/10 BKGRND CHECKKS
PD-AUGUST 2010 CPL STATE PATRO
CD-WACE DUES KEIRSEY
CD-WACE DUES LEMKE
CD-WACE DUES VAUSE
FWCC-GROUT, CLEANER, DUSTPAN
PD-07/10 CAR WASH SERVICE
CD-10-103276 REFUND DUPLICATE
CD-10-103276 REFUND DUPLICATE
CD-10-103276 REFUND DUPLICATE
SWR-08/10-10/10 LITTER DISPOS
PRCS-YOUTH T-SHIRTS AG10-099
IT/LAW-07/10 WEST LAW SVCS
PD-07/10 AUTO TRACKXP SVCS
PWFLT-OIL, FILTERS, BLADES
PKM-WORK BOOTS AND PANTS FISHE
PKM-WORK PANTS PRESNELL P06242
PWST-LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
SWM-REPAIR PARTS FOR SPRAYERS
PWST-LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
PD-07/10 RIFLE RANGE USAGE
SWR-07/10 RECYCLING PROG AG10-
PRCS-REFUND MOVING OUT OF STAT
PRCS-REFUND MOVING OUT OF STAT
Page 13 of 30
Amount Check Total
1.07
1,800.00
1,800.00
2,785.97
2,785.97
4,265.00
4,137.05
127.95
1,020.00
1,020.00
550.20
550.20
2,106.00
625.00
856.00
625.00
975.00
975.00
1 S, 858.58
18,858.58
116.83
116.83
109.40
109.40
773.75
100.00
673.75
120.00
40.00
40.00
40.00
34.21
34.21
1,181.41
1,181.41
114.00
3.00
3.00
108.00
25.11
25.11
255.14
255.14
1,794.28
1,696.89
97.39
395.65
395.65
458.70
285.73
172.97
1,040.54
217.80
126.04
696.70
241.55
241.55
655.25
658.25
344.00
17.00
100.00
Bank of Am erica Page 14 of 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
8/13/2010 808756 PRCS-REFUND MOVING OUT OF STAT 95.00
8/13/2010 808757 PRCS-REFUND MOVING OUT OF STAT 132.00
219259 8/31J2010 000660 WOODWORTH & COMPANY INC, 330,138.05
8/2/2010 AG10-054 #4 PWST-2010 ASPHALT OVERLAY AG10 330,138.05
219260 8l31/2010 006647 WSASC,
219261 9/2/2010
219262 9/2/2010
219263 9/3/2010
219264 9/15/2010
219265 9/15/2010
219266 9/15/2010
219267 9/15/2010
219268 9/15/2010
219269 9/15/2010
219270 9/15/2010
7/22/2010 1
006402 SAMUEL FRENCH INC,
9/2/2010 140556
006402 SAMUEL FRENCH INC,
9/2/2010 140556
000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC,
8/1 912 0 1 0 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 OS
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 OS
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 OS
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19I2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 OS
S/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 20'10 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 OS
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19l2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 OS
8l19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19l2010 PARKS 2010 OS
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 OS
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
8/19/2010 PARKS 2010 08
001360 AABCO BARRICADE COMPANY INC,
7l12/2010 86715
000332 ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS INC,
8/31/2010 MMFWA00061300000010
8/31/2010 MMFWA000613000000f0
011322 ABELLA, C. ANGELO
8/24l2010 OS/24/10
S/25/2010 08/25/10
004234 ABT TOWING OF FEDERAL WAY INC,
8/4/2010 50323
8/25/2010 50376
001856 ACTION SERVICES CORPORATION,
8l31/2010 66578
009556 ADVANCING IEADERSHIP,
8/25/2010 11-68
S/25/2010 11-68
010546 AFICHUK, SERGEY
9/1l2010 02-74315 REFUND
PRCS-SUMMER 2010 MARINERS GAME
PRCS-FRIENDSHIP THEATRE GREASE
PRCS-FRIENDSHIP THEATRE GREASE
PKM-08l10 2410 S 312TH STORAGE
PKM-OS/10 2410 S 312TH WOODSHO
PKF-OS/10 2645 S 312TH ANX-RR/
PKF-08/10 2645 S 312TH SEWER L
PKF-OS/10 2700 SW 340TH ALDERD
PKF-OS/10 28156 1/2 24TH HERIT
PKF-08/10 31104 28TH AVE S HAU
PKF-OS/10 31104 28TH AVE S HAU
PKM-08/10 31132 28TH AVE STLK
PKM-08/10 31132 28TH AVE S STL
PKM-08/10 31207 28TH AVE SKATE
DBC/KFT-OS/10 3200 SW DASH PT
DBC/KFT-OS/10 3200 SW DASH PT
DBC/KFT-08/10 3200 SW DASH PT
DBC/KFT-08/10 3200 SW DASH PT
PKF-OS/10 32730 17TH AVE SW AL
CHB-08/10 33325 STH AVE Z00453
PKF-08/10 33914 19TH AVE SAG F
PKF-08/10 34915 4TH AVE MARKX
PKF-08/10 34915 4TH AVE S PALI
PKF-OS/10 600 S 333RD EVID. BL
PKF-08/10 600 S 333RD EVID BLD
FWCC-08/10 876 S 333RD Z002806
FWCC-08/10 876 S 333RD 0008456
FWCC-08/10 876 S 333RD ST. LIG
PKCP-08/10 S 324TH BIDG A^
PKCP-08/10 S 324TH BLDG B-
PKF-OS/10 7TH AVE HISTORICAL S
PKF-08/10 7TH AVE HISTORICAL S
PKF-08/10 21 ST AVE LAKOTA RR B
PKF-OS/10 2410 S 312TH STLK ST
PKF-08/10 SAC PARK RR FIELD LI
PKF-08/10 1ST AVE & CAMPUS DR.
PKM-08/10 2410 S 312TH BEACH R
PRCS-RWB BARRICADE CONES
LAW-08l10 MNTHLY SRV FEE; 8/31
LAW-08/10 MNTHLY SRV FEE; 8Y31
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
PO-VEHICLE TOW SVC
PD-VEHICLE TOW SVC
PWST-08110 STREET SWEEPING SVC
CM-ADV LDRSHP TUIT B LINDQUIST
PD-ADV LDRSHP TUIT J MCCONNELL
PW-02-74315 AFICHUK ROW REFUND
610.00
610.00
100.00
100.00
2,112.00
2,112.00
54,182.55
14.00
64.89
1,550.32
11.11
10.11
24.05
26.26
15.55
352.75
42.30
10.11
1,008.40
496.67
181.03
89.16
10.11
13, 572.98
4,267.58
12.74
10.11
572.25
45.65
16,818.98
5,316.24
89.30
3,644.46
2,456.45
31.32
8.16
752.57
24.63
2, 326.94
28.34
297.00
242.38
242.38
125.00
62.50
62.50
200.00
100.00
100.00
350.40
175.20
175.20
4,232.55
4,232.55
945.00
472.50
472.50
673.57
704.07
Bank of America
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date In voice
9/1/2010 02-74315 REFUND
219271 9/15/2010 000568 AGRI SHOP iNC,
8/3112010 12185/1
8/25/2010 12090/1
8/12/2010 K12249/1
219272 9/15/2010 009460 AHO, SYLVIA FATIMA
8/24/2010 08/24/10
219273 9/15/2010 005225 AIRGAS - NOR PAC INC,
8/16/2010 101685884
219274 9l15/2010 000475 ALARM CENTERS/CUSTOM SECURITY,
8/23/2010 714418
8/23/2010 714420
8/23/2010 714421
219275 9/15I2010 001285 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC,
8/25/2010 TM-110963
8/26/2010 TM-111010
9/2/2010 TM-111242
9/2/2010 TM-111242
8/30/2010 TM-111104
8/30/2010 TM-111110
219276 9/15l2010 005287 AMERICALL COMMUNICATIONS &,
8/21/2010 D6416-0810
8/21/2010 D6416-0810
8/21/2010 D6417-0810
219277 9/15l2010 001522 AMERICAN RED CROSS,
7/8/2010 11001771
219278 9/1512010 011148 AMERICAN TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS INC,
8/31/2010 INV00004254
219279 9/15/2010 000190 APA-AMERICAN PLANN�NG ASSOC,
8/20/2010 197326-100502
219280 9/15/2010 010530 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES,
8/23/2010 655-5080123
219281 9/15/2010 010530 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES,
8/31/2010 655-5094914
219282 9/15/2010 011555 AVEDISYAN, RUBEN
9/7/2010 09/07/10 A
9/7/2010 09/07/10
219283 9/15/2010 001790 BARCREEN ELLINGSON INC,
8/16l2010 6177157
219284 9/15/2010 002445 BATES TECHNICAL COLLEGE,
8/27/2010 49785
219285 9/15/2010 010185 BIRD, FERESIKA S
9/7/2010 09l07/10
219286 9/15/2010 011489 BLACK DIAMOND GUN CLUB,
8/25/2010 28
219287 9/15/2010 012438 BORICUA GROUP LLC,
9/1/2010 01-81344 REFUND
219288 9l15/2010 011289 BOWMAN, JASON
9/8/2010 AUGUST 2010
219289 9/15/2010 011335 BROWN, JEFF
8/31/2010 2010-07
219290 9/15/2010 011282 CALKINS, NICHOLE
9/8/2010 AUGUST 2010
219291 9l15/2010 000991 CASCADE COFFEE INC,
S/30/2010 20619322
219292 9/15l2010 002351 CASCADE MOBILE MIX,
7/27/2010 259926T
219293 9/15/2010 008486 CASCADE SIGNAL CORPORATION,
8/2/2010 2714
219294 9l15/2010 005573 CDW GOVERNMENT INC,
9/2/2010 TTK1921
9!2/2010 TTK1921
Description
PW-02-74315 AFICHUK ROW REFUND
PWST-ENGINE OIL & BAR OIL
PKM-CHAIN SAW CHAINS
PWST-BLADE ASSY FOR HEDGE TRIM
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
PD-NITROGEN
PKCP-09/10-11/10 ALRM MNTR
PKM-09/10-11/10 ALRM MNTR STLK
PKM-09/10-11l10 ALRM MNTR STLK
PKM-ASPHALT CRACK AND JOINT SE
PWST-ASPHALT SEALER
PWST-ASPHALT SEALER & EAR PLUG
PWST-ASPHALT SEALER & EAR PLUG
PWST-SQUEEGEE BLADES
PWST-STOP/SLOW PADDLE
SWM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT SVC COST
SWM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT SVC COST
PKM-AFTER HR CAIL-OUT SVC ACCO
FWCC-FIRST AIDlCPR TRAINING
MC-08/10 RED LIGHT PHOTO
CD-APA DUES M HERRERA
FWCC-FLOOR MATS SVC
DBGLINEN SERVICE
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
SWR-RCYCL CONTAINER FOR SCHOOL
MC-MGMT TRNG FOR STAFF
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
PD-08/10 GUN RANGE DUES
FI-01-81344 REFUND BL NOT NEED
FWCC-OS/10 PERSONAL TRAINER SV
SWR-SWR COLLECTION REVIEWAG09
FWCC-08/10 PERSONAL TRNG SVCS
HR-COFFEE SUPPLIES
PRCS-ART WORK REPAIR/CONCRETE
PWTR-RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHIN
IT/PD-RR-PH III ITRONIX LAPTO
IT/PD-RR-PH III ITRONIX VEHICL
Page 15 of 30
Amount Check Total
-30.50
466.55
52.90
66.75
346.90
100.00
100.00
S 1.41
81.41
270.00
120.00
75.00
75.00
4,393.91
56.94
2,049.84
28.75
2,049.84
75.50
133.04
327.80
58.48
58.47
210.85
100.00
100.00
42,275.50
42,275.50
110.00
110.00
94.77
94.77
92.32
92.32
200.00
100.00
100.00
21.34
21.34
111.00
111.00
100.00
100.00
200.00
200.00
50.00
50.00
2,068.06
2,068.06
528.00
528.00
197.63
197.63
75.00
75.00
331.79
331.79
15,283.13
15,283.13
17,001.42
13,541.82
2,344.20
Ba nk of America Page 16 of 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
9/2/2010 TTK1921 ITlPD-RR-PH 111 ITRONIX LAPTOP 890.70
9!2l2010 TTK1921 IT/PD-RR-PH III ITRONIX LAPTOP 224.70
219295 9/15/2010 010954 CEDAR GROVE ORGANICS RECYCLING, 20.65
8/31l2010 0000033373 SWR-08/10 ORGANICS RECYCLING C 20.65
219296 9/15/2010 004430 CESSCO-THE CUT&CORE STORE INC, 240.14
7/23/2010 210090 PWFLT-OIL FILTER & CHOKE KIT 240.14
219297 9/15I2010 012457 CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY, 7,065.76
9/10/2010 32241 DBC-CANCELLATION REFUND 7,065.76
219298 9/15/2010 012378 CHUCK'S DRUG, 24.95
8/17/2010 149688 PD-08/10 PRISONER MED TREAT 24.95
219299 9/15/2010 011595 CITY OF BUCKLEY, 8,835.00
8/31/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-08/10 PRISONER LODGING AG10 8,835.00
219300 9/15/2010 004838 CITY OF ENUMCLAW, 880.00
9/2/2010 03076 PD-OS/10 PRISONER LODGING AG10 880.00
219301 9/15/2010 000951 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, 27,735.53
8/31/2010 AG10.109 #2 PWST-PAC HWY S HOV PH IV AG10- 27,735.53
219302 9l15/2010 010360 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, 1,933.36
9/2/2010 CK #1156 PD-WSSO SCHOOL SAFETY ECKERT 185.00
9/2/2010 CK #1156 PD-WSSO SCHOOL SAFETY ECKERT 340.28
9/3/2010 CK #1146 PD-NAMOA CONF. SCHULZ 160.00
9/3l2010 CK #1146 PD-NAMOA CONF. SCHULZ 659.16
9/3/2010 CK #1157 PD-NARCOTIC OPS COURSE SCHWAN 225.00
9/3/2010 CK #1157 PD-NARCOTIC OPS COURSE SCHWAN 363.92
219303 9/15/2010 005817 CITY OF FIFE, 23,412.07
8/10/2010 0005779 PD-07/10 PRISONER LODGING 23,412.07
219304 9/15/2010 003752 COASTWIDE SUPPLY DBA, 6,495.39
8/6/2010 W2219279 FWCC-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 748.03
8/13/2010 W2221947 FWCC-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1,171.79
8/18/2010 T2223002 CHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1,040.74
8/18/2010 T2223098 PKM-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 612.63
8/20/2010 T2223098-1 PKM-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129.65
8/24/2010 T2225374 DBC-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 307.91
8/26/2010 W2226138 FWCC-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 2,484.64
219305 9/15l2010 005102 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT COMPANY, 392.03
8/27/2010 7554531 SWM-SCI LAB RESEARCH INSTRUMEN 20.81
S/27/2010 7555847 SWM-SCI lAB RESEARCH SUPPLIES 303.53
8/27l2010 7555847 SWM-TRANSPORT FEES 46.06
8/10/2010 7537034 SWM-WATER QUALITY SUPPLIES 21.63
219306 9/15/2010 004395 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL, 305.95
8/26/2010 0220-531165 DBC-LIGHTING SUPPLIES 305.95
219307 9/15/2010 006649 CONTECH STORMWATER, 5,173.88
8/16/2010 INV0000016874 SWM-PHASE III STORM FILTERS 5,173.88
219308 9/15l2010 008445 COPIERS NORTHWEST INC, 59.05
S/24/2010 INV405568 IT-08/10 CANON IR10251F 59.05
219309 9/15/2010 000721 CORLISS RESOURCES INC, 861.8A
8/10/2010 257222 PWST-CONCRETE SUPPLIES 472.61
8/11/2010 257313 PWST-CONCRETE SUPPLIES 389.27
219310 9/15/2010 000771 COSTCO/HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, 2,453.61
8/26l2010 AUGUST2010 PRCS-DAYCAMPSUPPLIES 540.40
8/26/2010 AUGUST 2010 PRCS-VIEW BINDER, VOICE MAIL L 51.45
8/26/2010 AUGUST 2010 PRCS-LAMINATING SHEETS & TAPE 66.69
8/26/2010 AUGUST 2010 FWCC-FREEZER BAGS 12.20
Sl26/2010 AUGUST 2010 FWCC-FRONT DESK CHAIRS 448.93
8/26/2010 AUGUST 2010 FWCC-LAMINATING SHEETS & TAPE 79.93
8/26I2010 AUGUST 2010 PRCS-STAPLES, WRITING PADS, SU 38.23
8/26/2010 AUGUST 2010 FWCC-OFFICE SUPPLIES 47.19
8/26/2010 AUGUST 2010 FWCC-CURAD VINYL GLOVES 247.47
8/26l2010 AUGUST2010 FWCC-SANITIZING WIPES 67.01
8/26l2010 AUGUST 2010 PRCS-DAYCAMP SNACKS 295.23
8126/2010 AUGUST 2010 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 442.80
8/26/2010 AUGUST 2010 PRCS/FWCC-FIT CAMP SUPPLIES 33.70
8/26/2010 AUGUST 2010 PRCS/FWCC-FIT CAMP SUPPLIES 33.70
Bank of Am erica
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice
8/26/2010 AUGUST 2010
219311 9l15l2010 003890 CRAZY QUILTERS OF FEDERAL WAY,
6/30/2010 JUNE 30, 2010
219312 9/15/2010 009696 CRESTWOODANIMALHOSPITAL,
8/13/2010 14289
8/30/2010 14532
219313 9/15/2010 011315 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC,
8l24/2010 210155
8/24/2010 210155
219314 9/15/2010 010015 CUTHBERT, GAIL
9/3/2010 AUGUST 2010
219315 9/15/2010 000854 D J TROPHY,
8/31/2010 230042
8/9/2010 229907
219316 9/15/2010 003033 DESIGN PLUS,
8/25/2010 10035
219317 9/15l2010 005922 DEX MEDIA WEST,
8/23I2010 650474119
219318 9/15/2010 005341 DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA
S/24/2010 OS/24/10
8/31/2010 OS/31/10
9/7l2010 09/07/10
219319 9/15/2010 008297 DOWNER CORP,
8/20I2010 39247
219320 9/15/2010 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DBA),
8/13/2010 1076216
8/13/2010 1076226
S/14/2010 1076246
9/4/2010 1076595
9/4/2010 1076597
9/4/2010 1076608
9/4/20'10 1076610
9/3/2010 1076585
219321 9/15/2010 006177 EARL, SHARYN LYNN
7/14l2010 10005
219322 9/15/2010 009021 EDWARDS, NOLAND A
8/24/2010 OS/24/10
219323 9l15/2010 007919 EMPIRE FACILITY SERVICES INC,
8/17/2010 15271
219324 9/15/2010 001046 EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SVC,
8/23/2010 5684908
219325 9/15l2010 000328 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA),
8/15/2010 0338709
8/31/2010 0339671
8/31/2010 0339672
8/31/2010 0339672
219326 9/15/2010 011726 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS, INC,
6/15l2010 1951476
6/16/2010 195880
8/1312010 2243167
219327 9l15/2010 006645 EXPRESS TOWING LLC,
8/18/2010 12940
8/31/2010 12803
219328 9l15/2010 000217 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,
8/20/2010 7-198-32504
219329 9/15l2010 001893 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
9/7/2010 SIF-AUG 2010
9/7/2010 SIF-AUG 2010
219330 9/15/2010 005213 FIFE PRINTING,
8/24/2010 20070
219331 9/15I2010 010305 FIRST STUDENT,
8/23/2010 10425337
Description
FWCC-SWIM TEAM PHOTO PRINTS
PRCS-KFT ART EXHIBITION 9/10-1
PD-K9 ROSCOE BOARDING
PD-K9 ROSCOE BOARDING
PKM-GRASS SEED
PKM-GRASS SEED
FWCC-08/10 PERSONAL TRNG SVCS
PD-VOLUNTEER PLAQUE ENGRAVING
PRCS-SPORTS T-SHIRTS
PKM-COUNCIL DIAS MODIFICATIONS
DBC-OS/10 DIRECTORY ADS
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
CHB-INTR RM SIGNS WITH SLIDER
P WF LT-TI RES
P WF LT-TI RES
P WF LT-H EATI NG/COOLI N G
PWFLT-LOF
PWFLT-LOF
PWFLT-LOF
PWFLT-LOF
PWFLT-ELECTRICAL WORK
PRCS-FALL 2010 DESIGN & PRODUC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
PD-HON UPRIGHT CABINETS
PD-OS/10 CREDIT REPORTS
PWFLT-07/31-8/15/10 FUEL CHARG
PWFLT-8l15-8/31/10 FUEL CHARGE
PD-8/15-8/31/10 SIU FUEL CHARG
PD-8/15-5l31/10 FUEI CHARGES
PKM-TURFACE AT CP
PKM-TURFACE FOR STLK PARK /INV
PKM-IRRIGATION HEADS
PD-VEHICLE TOW SVC
PD-VEHICLE TOW CASE 10-11292
PD-FEDEX TO MHSC
FI-OS/10 SCHL IMPACT FEE & INT
FI-OS/10 SCHL IMPACT FEE & INT
MC-SUMMONS, NOTICE OF CASE SET
FWCC-DAY CAMP FIELD TO CENTURY
Page 17 of 30
Amount Check Total
48.68
200.00
200.00
572.00
104.00
468.00
1,839.60
919.80
919.80
2,502.45
2,502.45
607.54
10.00
597.54
14,300.70
14,300.70
552.94
552.94
400.00
175.00
112.50
112.50
543.12
543.12
1,353.49
392.51
392.51
329.68
54.70
54.70
47.91
47.9'I
33.57
1,410.00
1,410.00
100.00
100.00
385.44
385.44
20.00
20.00
24,895.59
6, 300.44
6,255.35
808.11
11, 531.69
1,244.62
561.42
532.64
150.56
350.00
175.00
175.00
94.56
94.56
15,330.62
15,328.00
2.62
1,048.24
1,048.24
3,750.00
297.00
Bank of America Page 18 of 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Descrfption Amount C heck Total
8l13/2010 10425648 FWCC-DAY CAMP TO HENRY MOSES A 1,104.00
8/13/2010 10425649 FWCC-DAY CAMP FIELD TO SAFECO 1,104.00
8/30/2010 10429786 FWCC-DAY CAMP WOODLAND PARK ZO 1,245.00
219332 9/75I2010 002664 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC, 288.30
8/31/2010 161431 HR-OS/10 FLEX PLAN ADM SVCS 258.30
219333 9/15/2010 004366 FLOYD EQUIPMENT COMPANY DBA, 852.02
9/3/2010 70136 PWST-MILD STEEL PLATE 610.05
S/1S/2010 69887 PWST-CHANNEL & FLAT BARS FOR T 241.97
219334 9/15/201Q 008860 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA, 3,678.34
8/24/2010 2427100 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 823.29
8/27/2010 2437237 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 900.06
9/1/2010 2447433 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 1,954.99
219335 9l15/2010 009242 FSH COMMUNICATIONS LLC, 80.00
9/1/2010 000387713 IT-09/10 FSH PAYPHONE SVCS 80.00
219336 9/15I2010 012134 FURGALA, MONIKA M 284.36
5/14/2010 MARCH 15, 2005 PRCS-N. LAKE ESTATES MITIGATIO 284.36
219337 9/15/2010 004566 G&M HONEST PERFORMANCE, 51.31
8/31/2010 138442 PWFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES 24.85
8/20l2010 138095 PWFLT-WIPER BLADES 26.46
219338 9/15/2010 009729 GALAXY SPECIALTY CO., 30.15
S/26/2010 68009 MC-CALENDAR PADS 30.15
219339 9/15/2010 011681 GINA M. DUNCAN LAW OFFICE PLLC, 1,000.00
8/31/2010 1017 CM-OS/10 CONFLICT DEFENDER AGO 250.00
8l31/2010 1018 CM-08/10 CONFLICT DEFENDER AGO 250.00
8/31/2010 1019 CM-08/10 CONFLICT DEFENDER AGO 250.00
7/10/2010 1016 CM-OS/10 CONfLICT DEFENDER AGO 250.00
219340 9/15/2010 010940 GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE CNTR, 417.21
S/12/2010 146785 PD-NEW TIRES DELIVERED TO SPAR 417.21
219341 9l15/2010 004824 GOS PRINTING CORPORATION, 733.95
8/20/2010 75032 PD-NOTICE OF TRESPASS & SUPPLE 308.97
8/20/2010 75047 PD-ANIMAL CONTROL RECEIPT BOOK 424.98
219342 9/15/2010 002574 GRAHAM & DUNN, P.C., 454.00
8/16/2010 303538 PWST-SR99 HOV LANES PHASE IV^ 419.00
8l16l2010 303539 PWST-SR99 HOV LANES PHASE IV- 35.00
219343 9l15l2010 002547 GRAINGER INC, 749.06
8/17/2010 9325944990 FWCGCIRCULAR SAW BLADES 28.75
8/18/2010 9327375995 FWCC-92 DEG ANGLE 157.68
8l19/2010 9327647237 FWCC-CONTROL BOX 293.18
8/23l2010 9330609430 FWCC-FIIM TAPE 16.91
8/23/2010 9330609448 FWCC-SPATULA & WHEEL BRUSH 30.67
8/23/2010 9330611220 FWCC-PULLER 5 TON 2/3 JAW 98.11
8/24/2010 9332230250 PKM-TOILET SEAT COVER DISPENSE 43.89
8/25/2010 9332915595 FWCC-FURNACE BOILER BRUSH 13.66
8/26l2010 9334052702 FWCC-STOP COLLAR SET 21.13
8/26/2010 9334052710 FWCC-WOOD SCREWS 22.10
8/26/2010 9334239523 FWCC-SNAPPY CNTRSINK SET 22.98
219344 9/15l2010 010738 GREEN EFFECTS, INC, 2,576.68
9/1/2010 31804 FWCC-08/10LANDSCAPINGAG08-06 2,576.68
219345 9/15/2010 003831 GSR POLYGRAPH SERVICES, 300.00
8/31l2010 10.017 PD-08/10 POLYGRAPH EXAMS 300.00
219346 9/15/2010 002590 HACH COMPANY, 21.56
8/23/2010 6872880 SWM-WTR QLTY TEST CHEMICALS 21.56
219347 9/15/2010 701936 HARRINGTON ELECTRIC, 86.50
9/3/2010 10-103676 CD-10-103676 REFUND DUPLICATE 3.00
9/3/2010 10-103676 CD-10-103676 REFUND DUPLICATE 3.00
9/3/2010 10-103676 CD-10-103676 REFUND DUPLICATE 80.5�
219348 9/15/2010 003841 HEAD-QUARTERS PTS, 684.75
9/1/2010 23114 PKM-PORTABLE TOILET SVCS AG06- 684.75
219349 9/15/2010 001487 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, 12,770.94
8l11/2010 48089753 IT-RR SERVER HP PROLIANT DL38 12,770.94
219350 9/15l2010 002477 HOME DEPOT-DEPT 32-2500780030, 631.94
8/27/2010 AUGUST 2010 PWfR-TOTE FOR TRAFFIC COUNTER 18.59
Bank of Am erica
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice
8/27/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/27/2010 AUC,UST 2010
8/27/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/27/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/27/2010 AUGUST 2010
8l27/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/27/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/27/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/27/2010 AUGUST 2010
219351 9/15/2010 009785 HOWARD, TODD
S/30/2010 112
9/1/2010 113
219352 9/15/2010 003560 HUNTERS TREE SERVICE,
9/2/2010 2571
219353 9/15/2010 012446 HUYEN, MARTIN
8/31/2010 OS/31/10
9/7/2010 09/07/10
219354 9/15/2010 012444 HUYNH, SANG
8/24/2010 813780
219355 9/15/2010 003211 IRON MOUNTAIN/SAFESITE INC,
8/31/2010 CHN8263
219356 9/15/2010 011711 J& D PRINTING INC,
9/17/2010 46952
219357 9/15/2010 009079 J AND Y INVESTMENT LLC,
9/9/2010 SEPTEMBER 2010
219358 9/15I2010 012345 J.R. HAYES & SONS, INC.,
8l31/2010 AG10-109 #2
8/31/2010 AG10-109 #2
219359 9/15/2010 010838 JOHNSON, STEPHEN G
8/27/2010 AUGUST 27, 2010
219360 9/15/2U10 012358 JONES, SUSAN
9/2/2010 817520
219361 9/15/2010 011472 KARIVKI, PAUI
9/7/2010 09/07/10
219362 9/15/2010 011004 KEIRSEY, CINDY
7/29l2010 KEIRSEY 2010
219363 9/15/2010 011501 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INC,
7/29/2010 2010SU-F159
219364 9/15/2010 011736 KIM, CHUL JOON
8/24/2010 08/24/10
9!7/2010 09/07/10
8/31/2010 OS/31/10 A
8l31/2010 OSl31/10
219365 9/15/2010 011737 KIMMEL ATHLETIC SUPPLY CO. INC,
7/22/2010 0296437-IN
219366 9/15/2010 001259 KING COUNTY CRIME VICTIMS FUND,
9/10/2010 AUGUST 10
219367 9/15/2010 000125 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION,
8/20/2010 1579600
8/20/2010 1579600
8/20/2010 1579600
8/20/2010 157960�
8/20/2010 1580079
8l17/2010 1579260
8/17/2010 1579261
8/17/2010 1579262
8l17/2010 1579263
8/17/2010 1579264
8/17/2010 1579264
8/17/2010 1579264
8/17/2010 1579264
8/17/2010 1579264
Description
FWCC-OCC SENSOR 3 CELL LAMP TU
FWCC-OCC SENSOR 3 CELL LAMP TU
FWCC-OCC SENSOR 3 CELL LAMP TU
SWNI-CATCH BASIN INSPECT. EQUIP
PKM-DUCTWORK @ STLK SHOP SUPPL
FWCC-POWER TAPE
PD-FIREARMS VICE
PD-FIREARMS TRNG TAPE, STAPLES
FWCC-WET/DRY VAC, FILTERS, BUC
CM-08/10 CONFLICT DEFENDER AGO
CM-12/09 CONFLICT DEFENDER AGO
DBC-REMOVE FALLEN TREE
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
PRCS-REFUND CANCELLED MEMBERSH
HRCK-08/10 RECORDS STORAGE AG9
CM-PRNT'WHAT'S HAPPENING' FAL
IT-09/10 WIFI SITE LEASE AGOS-
PWST-PAC HWY S HOV PH IV AG10-
PWST-PAC HWY S HOV PH IV AG10-
CM-08/10 CONFLICT DEFENDER AGO
PRCS-CAMP 27142 REFUND
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
CD-WACE CONF. KEIRSEY
FWCC-SUMMER 2010 YOUTH SOCCER
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
PRCS-VOLLEYBALLS
FI-08/10 REMIT CRIME VICTIM FE
IT-09/10 NET SVCS
IT-09/10 NET SVCS
IT-09/10 NET SVCS
IT-09/10 NET SVCS
PD-07/10 PRISONER LODGING AG02
PWTR-07/10 BSC SIGN/MRKNGS MTN
RISK-REPLACE DAMAGED POLES
PD-RADAR SIGN REPAIR/MAINT
PWfR-07/10 BSC SIGN/MRKNGS MTN
PWTR-07/10 DISC INVSTGTN TRFFC
PWTR-07/10 DISC INVST TRFFC-FY
PWTR-07/10 DISC INVST PED. SAF
PWTR-07/10 DISC INVST NTS SCHL
PWST-07l10 DISC INVST 2010 OVE
Page 19 of 30
Amount Check Total
89.75
11.06
106.81
65.67
50.10
11.27
54.72
24.88
199.09
562.50
250.00
312.50
871.54
871.54
200.00
100.00
100.00
504.22
504.22
3,052.31
3,052.31
203.67
203.67
310.00
310.00
526,974.98
554,710.51
-27,735.53
2,625.00
2,625.00
95.00
95.00
100.00
100.00
65.00
65.00
3,065.25
3,065.25
400.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
344.93
344.93
1,919.05
1,919.05
127,389.47
419.20
104.80
262.00
262.00
70,159.54
29,404.21
10,402.03
1.334.27
327.33
6,215.23
987.60
588.82
2,474.45
296.27
Bank of America Page 20 of 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
8/17/2010 1579264 PWST-07/10 DISC INVST SR99 PH 395.03
8/17/2010 1579264 PWST-07l10 DISC INVST 348TH & 98.76
8/17/2010 1579264 IT-07/10 KC DISC SAFE CITIES 3,657.93
219368 9/15/2010 005568 KING COUNTY FLEET ADM DIVISION, 1,679.88
8/11/2010 204960 SWM-OIL BOOMS 8 CABLE THROTTLE 71.95
8/10/2010 204959 SWR-LITTER BAGS FROM KC FLEET 779.15
8/10/2010 204959 PWFLT-MOWER KNIFE BOOTS 828.78
219369 9/15/2010 003898 KING COUNTY RADIO, 8,447.49
8/24/2010 4235 IT/PD-08/10 RADIO ACCESS 8,156.54
S/23/2010 00424049 IT/PD-RADIO MAINT/REPAIR 57.94
8/23/2010 00424060 IT/PD-RADIO MAINT/REPAIR 57.94
8/23/2010 00424165 IT/P0.RADI0 MAINT/REPAIR 175.07
219370 9/15l2010 000022 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT, 80.00
9/7l2010 SERVICE # 11300 CD-ROGERS DEMO METER 83682050 80.00
219371 9/15/2010 000096 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT, 2,709.62
9/10/2010 2814401 PKM-05-06/10 2645 312TH ANNEX 18.36
9/8/2010 1768602 DBC-05/10-07/10 SEWER 3200 SW 206.58
9/8/2010 1768602 DBC-O5/10-07/10 KFT SEWER 3200 101.75
8/20/2010 3033601 PKM-OS-06/10 28159 24TH PL S# 157.68
8/20l2010 822402 PKM-05-06/10 30009 16TH AVE #8 1,240.69
8/20/2010 824102 PKM-OS-06/10 30000 14TH AVE S 98.54
8/20/20'10 824102 PKM-OS-06/10 30000 14TH AVE S 44.00
8/20/2010 888103 PKM-OS-06/10 31132 28TH AVE S 124.53
8l20/2010 888103 PKM-OS-O6/10 31132 28TH AVE S 95.15
8/20/2010 888302 PKM-OS-06/10 31104 28TH AVE S 30.79
8/20/2010 888302 PKM-OS-06/10 31104 28TH AVE S 32.45
8/20/2010 896402 PKM-OS-06/10 312TH ST #896402 18.04
8/20/2010 899802 PKM-05-06/10 2410 312TH ST #89 305.09
8/20/2010 899802 PKM-05-O6/10 2410 312TH ST #89 191.29
8/20/2010 101 PKM-05-06/10 31132 28TH AVE S 20.59
8/20/2010 101 PKM-05-06/10 31132 28TH AVE S 24.09
219372 9/15/2010 001939 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC, 4,206.39
S/30/2010 27232 SWM-07/10 ON CALL ENVIRON SVC 4,206.39
219373 9/15/2010 004052 LEED,
8/20/2010 08201002
219374 9/15/2010 010111 LEMKE, REBECCA
9/9/2010 LEMKE 2010
219375 9/15/2010 003157 LES SCHWAB TIRE CTRS OF WA INC,
8/2/2010 447588
219376 9/15/2010 012455 LEZARD, ROBERT
9/2/2010 817452
219377 9/15/2010 000630 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC,
8/31/2010 143101
8/9/2010 142419
8/11/2010 142533
S/12/2010 142595
S/12/2010 142595
8/13/2010 142605
8/13/2010 142605
8/20/2010 142920
8/16/2010 142649
8/17/2010 142692
8/18/2010 142770
8/18l2010 142772
8/18/2010 142774
219378 9/15l2010 005339 LOWE'S HIW INC,
8/20/2010 14549
8/20/2010 02380
8/23/2010 02873
8/24/2010 02096
8/25/2010 01579
8/26/2010 02382
8/27/2010 02595
PD-SWAT HOLSTER FOR RIGGLES
CD-WACE CONF. LEMKE
PWFLT-NEW TIRES
PRCS-COED CANCELLED - REFUND
SWIN-CONCRETE MIX
SWM-LAURELWOOD BRUSH REMOVAL
SWM-LAURELWOOD DITCHING TOPSOI
PWST/SWM-CONCRETE & SOD
PWST/SWM-CONCRETE & SOD
PWST/SWM-CONCRETE MIX 8 SOD
PWST/SWM-CONCRETE MIX & SOD
SWM-DIG OUT PONDS - SOD
SWM-MIRROR WOOD WASTE DISPOSAL
SWM-DASH PT ROAD DITCHING SOD
PKM-SAND COMPOSIT MIX LAKOTA F
PKM-DUMP DEBRIS
PKM-SAND COMPOSIT MIX LAKOTA F
PKM-LK KILLARNEY BENCH REPAIRS
PWST-CRACK SEAL SUPPLIES
PKM-FRENCH LK KIOSK REPAIRS
PKM-WASP KILLER PD PARKING LOT
PKM-TRUCK SUPPLIES
PKM-POT HOLE REPAIR MATL
PKM-CEILING TILES
182.42
182.42
65.00
65.00
288.09
288.09
675.00
675.00
3,388.20
330.96
228.81
680.26
13422
151.5'1
468.21
283.41
137.57
50.97
91.45
208.05
206.68
416.10
50.39
224.28
10.75
8.11
63.10
61.23
29.02
543.00
B ank of America
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice
8/31l2010 02137
9/7l2010 02132
219379 9/15I2010 005760 L-TECH ENTERPRISES INC,
8/23/2010 10198
219380 9/15/2010 005043 MACHINERY POWER & EQUIPMENT CO,
S/16/2010 32004295-0001
219381 9l15l2010 001004 MAILMEDIA DBA IMMEDIA,
9/10/2010 60348PA
219382 9/15I2010 009433 MAKSIMOV, YURI
9/2/2010 09/02/10
8/31/2010 08/31/10
219383 9/15/2010 001675 MCDOUGAL, MARY
8/25/2010 MCDOUGAL 2010
219384 9/15/2010 . 010256 MCMASTER-CARR,
8/10/2010 62308691
8/10/2010 62308691
219385 9/15/2010 005176 MERINO STRAWE, BETTY
8/24/2010 08/24/10
8/31/2010 OS/31l10
219386 9/15/2010 004350 MICRO DATA BUSINESS FORMS,
8/18/2010 40890
219387 9/15/2010 008029 MONTES DE OCA RICKS, MARIA
9/7/2010 09/07/10
219388 9/15/2010 011965 MORRISON, BARRY RICHARD
8/24/2010 AUGUST 24, 2010
219389 9/15I2010 003868 NATIONAL BARRICADE COMPANY INC,
8/26/2010 231583
219390 9/15/2010 010612 NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT,
9/3l2010 1362
219391 9/15/2010 000043 NEW LUMBER 8 HARDWARE COMPANY,
9/2/2010 249277
8/25/2010 249025
8/19/2010 248874
8/20/2010 248903
8/23/2010 248963
219392 9/15l2010 012450 NILSEN, MYAH
8/31l2010 32192
219393 9/15/2010 001391 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY,
S/12l2010 S3539139.001
8/13/2010 S3540638.001
219394 9/15/2010 008519 NORTHWEST EMERG PHYS INC,
8/16/2010 93593425/511
219395 9/15/2010 003736 NORTHWEST TOWING INC,
8/8/2010 404337
219396 9/15l2010 003529 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES,
8/21/2010 340673-003
219397 9/15/2010 000044 OGDEN, MURPHY, WALLACE, PLLC,
8/31/2010 685987
8/31/2010 685988
8/31/2010 685989
8/31/2010 685990
8/31/2010 685991
8/31/2010 685992
8/31/2010 685993
8/31/2010 685994
8/31l2010 685995
219398 9/15/2010 00934t OMNI LANDSCAPE SERVICES,
8/1/2010 36557
219399 9/15/2010 007444 ORCA PACIFIC INC,
8/11/2010 045449
8/19/2010 045550
219400 9/15/2010 009920 OSAKA GARDEN SERVICE, INC,
Description
DBC-REPAIR/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE
PWST-PAINT, ROLLERS, RUST TREA
PD-B.D.U. TOOLS
SWM-CAT RENTAL LAURELWOOD DITC
PRGS-FALL 2010 ARTS COMMISSION
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
HR-WAPELRA CONF. MCDOUGAL
FWCGCAULK 8 PVC PIPE
FWCC-CAULK & PVC PIPE
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
PD-INFRACTION FORMS
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
CM-08/10 CONFLICT DEFENDER AG1
SWM-SGN FOR LN CLOSURE WARNING
PD-LVNR RECERT. DAVIS & STRAY
SWM-CAULKING GUN
FWCC-FELT PAPER
SWM-DUCT TAPE, SAFETY SNAP
SWM-CLP SCREW, MISC SCREWS
PKM-ABS PIPE LAKOTA IRRIG
DBC-RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
PKM-EXT LGHTS FOR DUMAS BAY CE
PKM-EXT LGHTS FOR DUMAS BAY CE
PD-08/10 PRISONER MED TREAT
PD-VEHICLE TOW CASE 10-01245
HR-HEP B VACCINE
MSC-07/10 HEX RHODES AG07-137-
MSC-08/10 HEX BRANCHES GARDEN
MSC-OS/10 HEX LIFEWAY CHURCH A
MSC-08/10 HEX MIDWAY SAMOAN CH
MSC-08/10 HEX JONES APPEAL AGO
MSC-08/10 HEX NORPOINTAG07-13
MSC-OS/31 HEX WSDOT TRIANGLE P
MSC-08/10 HEX VILLAGE GREEN AG
MSC-08/10 HEX MASON UNFIT BLDG
PKM-OS/10 LANDSCAPE SVC-
FWCC-POOL CHEMICALS MAINTAG09
FWCC-POOL CHEMICALS MAINT AG09
Page 21 of 30
Amount Check ToTal
7.10
89.02
10020
100.20
1,221.76
1,221.76
864.00
864.00
200.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
211.07
65.72
145.35
325.00
200.00
125.00
3,748.55
3,748.55
100.00
100.00
250.00
250.00
28.79
28.79
250.00
250.00
82.43
2.18
10.95
8.16
7.96
53.18
300.00
300.00
110.66
69.81
40.85
522.00
522.00
175.20
175.20
75.00
75.00
8,255.17
800.00
800.00
950.00
816.20
800.00
950.00
1,401.00
925.52
812.45
2,844.50
2,844.50
1,158.26
638.21
520.05
22, 909.32
Bank of A merica Page 22 of 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
8/1/2010 26858 PKM-OS/10 LANDSCAPE MAINTAG10 2,423.24
9/1/2010 27069 PWST-08/10 ROW LANDSCAPE MAINT 20,486.08
219401 9/15/2010 005741 OUTCOMES BY LEW, 4,497.11
8/31/2010 AUGUST 2010 CM-O8/10 LEGISLATIVE LOBBY AG1 4,497.11
219402 9l15I2010 001814 PARAMETRIX INC, 70,976.99
8/18/2010 03-49257 PWST-348TH INTERSECTION IMPROV 70,976.99
219403 9/15/2010 012007 PARK CHENAUR & ASSOCIATES �NC, 562.50
8/17/2010 AUGUST 17, 2010 CM-OS/10 CONFLICT DEFENDER AG1 562.50
219404 9/15/2010 003594 PARKER, SCOTT 180.00
8/10/2010 PARKER 2010 PD-CISM CONF S. PARKER 180.00
219405 9/15I2010 010613 PETEK, PHD, THOMAS C 250.00
8/12/2010 7840 PD-RETURN TO DUTY EVALUATION 250.00
219406 9/15l2010 012440 PETHEALTH SERVICES INC, 2,400.00
7/26/2010 SIUN0428840 PD-PETPOINT SOFTWARE 08/10-OS/ 2,400.00
219407 9/15/2010 011624 PETTY CASH - DBC, 146.65
9/7/2010 DBC-9/7/10 DBC-CATERING GROCERIES-SAFEWAY 35.49
9/7/2010 DBC-9/7/10 DBC-CATERING GROCERIES-SAFEWAY 84.51
9/7/2010 DBC-9!7/10 DBC-PRINTING-BULLETIN BOARD 6.56
9!1/2010 DBC-9!7/10 DBC-EMER. BACKPACK, GOODWILL 4.37
9!7/2010 DBC-9/7l10 DBC-CATERING GROCERIES-SAFEWAY 15.72
219408 9/15/2010 012383 PETTY CASH- FWCC, 387.04
9!7/2010 FWCC-9/7/10 PRCS-ADAPTER FOR SLIDESHOW 5.34
9/7/2010 FWCC-9/7/10 PRCS-SPECIAL OLYMPICS SOFTBALL 2.24
9!7l2010 FWCC-9/7/10 PRCS-SPECIAL OLYMPICS SOFTBALL 29.56
9!7/2010 FWCC-9/7/10 PRCS-SPECIAL OLYMPICS SOFTBALL 9.85
9/7/2010 FWCC-9/7/10 PRCS-SPECIAL OLYMPIC SOFTBALL 51.96
9/7/2010 FWCC-9/7/10 FWCC-BIN FOR FREE WEIGHTS 5.47
9!7l2010 FWCC-9!7/10 FWCGGUEST PASS TO HAC 10.00
9/7/2010 FWCC-9/7/10 FWCC-MOVIE RENTAL 1.10
9!7/2010 FWCC-9/7/10 PRCS-IRON FOR DAY CAMP 5.75
9/7/2010 FWCC-9/7/10 PRCS-FOOD FOR SUMMER CAMP 31.90
9/7/2010 FWCC-9!1/10 PRCS-SUPPLIES FOR DAY CAMP 38.58
9/7/2010 FWCC-9f7/10 PRCS-COPIES FOR ATS COMM 6.71
9/7l2010 FWCC-9/7/10 FWCC-WAX FOR POOL SLIDE 29.98
9/7l2010 FWCC-9/7/10 FWCC-PROPANE FOR KID ESCAPE 9.82
9/7/2010 FWCC-9!7/10 PRCS-SUPPLIES FOR DAY CAMP 49.58
9/7/2010 FWCC-9/7/10 PRCS-SUPPLIES FOR RW&B 9.84
9!7/2010 FWCC-9/7/10 PRCS-DAY CAMP FIELD TRIP 11.00
9/7/2010 FWCC-9/7/10 PRCS-FIT CAMP FIELD TRIP 15.00
9!7/2010 FWCC-9/7/10 PRCS-FOOD FOR DAY CAMP 5.76
9/7/2010 FWCC-9!T/10 FWCC-NAT'L FITNESS CONF DOUG N 54.60
219409 9/t5/2010 007059 PHELPSTIRE CO, 1,569.73
8/24/2010 491554 PWFLT-NEW TIRES 460.83
8/24/2010 49'1611 PWFLT-NEW TIRES 680.22
8/24/2010 491685 PWFLT-NEW TIRES 428.68
219410 9/15/2010 006856 PHOENIX ASPHALT MAINTENANCE, 2,200.00
9/3/2010 9813 PWST-BEARCAT RENTAL CRACK SEAL 2,200.00
219411 9/15/2010 000808 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY, 205.95
8/2/2010 8100357 PKM-EXTERIOR LIGHTS FOR DUMAS 205.95
219412 9/15/2010 012454 PRATT. MIA
9/3/2010 817864
219413 9/15/2010 005553 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC,
8/20/2010 37335564
219414 9/15/2010 009363 PRO-TOW MAPLE VALLEY,
8/21/2010 106261
219415 9l15/2010 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC,
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 OS
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 OS
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 08
8/30/2010 PVVTR 2010 08
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08
8/3�/2010 PWTR 2010 08
PRCS-REFUND SPRINT TRIATHALON
PKM-OXYGEN FOR FIELD SPRAYER C
PD-VEHICLE TOW CASE 10-10803
PWT R-08/10 CRNR S 316TH ST & 2
PWTR-08/10 HOYT RD & 340TH-
PWiR-08/10 PAC HWY S& S 330TH
PWfR-OS/10 S 288TH ST & PAC HW
PWTR-08/10 S288TH & 18TH AVE S
PVVTR-08/10 S 296TH PL & MILITA
PWTR-08/10 S 320TH & 23 AV S^
20.00
20.00
17.30
17.30
217.20
217.20
13,105.99
69.68
88.44
73.76
464.35
112.12
27.44
282.63
Bank of America Page 23 ot 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
8/30I2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08l10 S 322ND & 23 AVE S- 189.13
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 S 336TH ST & PAC HW 653.&4
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 08 PVVTR-08/10 S 282ND & MILITARY 139.91
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWfR-OS/10 S 316TH & PAC HWY S 58.91
8/30/2010 P1MR 2010 08 PWfR-08/10 SW CRNR S 312TH & P 208.35
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 SW 308TH & 2ND AVE 10.11
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 SW 329TH WAY & HOYT 10.11
8/30l2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 VARIOUS LOCATIONS- 29.04
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 1TH WAY S& 334TH S 17.09
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 1ST WAY S 8 336TH S 92.11
8/30/2010 PV1RR 2010 OS PWfR-08/10 1ST AVE S& S 330TH 60.90
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-OS/10 1000 SW CAMPUS DR- 141.11
S/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWTR-OS/10 115TH ST S& 316ST 10.51
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 1300 S 344TH ST- 27.64
8l30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 1403 SW 312TH ST PE 10.11
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 1405 S 312TH ST.- 129.75
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWfR-08/10 14145 324TH ST.- 33.52
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 1790 SW 345TH PLACE 146.58
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 08 PWTR-08l10 18TH AVE & S 312 ST 65.90
S/30/2010 PWfR 2010 OS PWTR-08l10 199 SW 311TH PLACE- 131.84
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 21 ST AVE SW & SW 33 122.57
8l30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-OS/10 21 ST AVE SW & SW 34 279.68
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 21ST AVE S GRID ROA 54.45
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-OS/10 21 ST AVE SW 8 SW 32 106.73
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 21 ST AVE SW 8 356TH 86.71
S/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWTR-OS/10 2140 SW 356TH ST- 34.01
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 23RD AVE S 8 S 317T 190.SS
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 23RD AVE S& 320TH 181.46
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 O8 PWTR-08/10 2510 S 336TH ST- 22.07
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWfR-08/10 2510 SW 336TH STREE 10.11
8/30/2010 PWTR 20'10 08 PWTR-08l10 2613 S 275TH PLACE 25.80
8l30/2010 PWfR 2010 08 PVVfR-OS/10 28516 24TH AVE S- 20.96
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-OS/10 29600 PAC HWY S SIG 412.96
8/30/20'10 PWfR 2010 08 PWTR-OS/10 2999 SW 314TH ST- 70.68
8/30/2010 PVYfR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 30400TH PAC HWY S- 52.94
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWTR-OS/10 30500 PAC HWY S- 51.35
8/30l2010 PWfR 2010 08 PWTR-OS/10 31020 14TH AVE S^ 37.19
8/30/201� PWTR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 3113 27TH AVE SW- 86.77
8/30l2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 31200 STATE RT 99 S 338.15
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 31455 28TH AVE S- 74.07
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 31600 STATE RT 99 S 99.17
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWfR-08/10 31847 PAC HWY S- 237.43
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 31910 GATEWAY CNTR 43.47
8l30/2010 PWI'R 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 32000 PAC HWY S- 258.05
8/30/2010 PWl'R 2010 08 PWTR-OS/10 32400 STATE RT 99 N 105.54
8/30/2010 PWiR 2010 08 PWTR-OS/10 21 ST AVE SW 8 DASH 69.88
8/30/2010 PV1l�R 2010 08 PWTR-OS/10 S 333ST & 1ST WAY- 68.51
S/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWfR-08/10 S 348TH HOV LANE- 216.91
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 OS PWiR-08/10 32400 STATE RT 99 S 266.62
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 OS PWfR-OS/10 32400 STATE RT 99 S 102.55
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 08 PWiR-08/10 32932 7TH CT SW- 19.66
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 OS PWfR-OS/10 32562 SW HOYT RD FL 10.11
8/30/2010 PVVTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 32731 HOYT RD FLASH 10.11
8l30l2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWfR-OS/10 33099 HOYT RD SW- 241.85
8/30l2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 3318 SW 346TH PLACE 35.64
S/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-OS/10 33220 ST WAY S- 41.79
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 33325 8TH AVE- 114.71
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 33401 38TH AVE S- 150.17
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 33405 6TH AVE S- 40.58
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 33507 9TH AVE- 75.25
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 33645 20TH PLACE- 230.26
S/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 33800 WEYHR WAY S- 233.76
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 34010 20TH AVE- 105.84
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 34018 PAC HWY S- 49.95
Ba nk of America Page 24 of 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
8/30I2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 3420 SW 343RD ST- 26.04
8l30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 34800 21ST AVE SW 82.95
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 34836 WEYHR WAY S- 53.24
8/30/2010 PWT'R 2010 08 PVY�R-08l10 34801 16TH AVE S- 72.66
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 35007 ENCHANTED PKW 133.04
8/30/2010 PWI'R 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 35106 21 ST AVE SW- 31.03
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 35202 ENCHANT PKWY- 235.26
8/30l2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 35505 PAC HWY S^ 266.93
8/30l2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 29600 PAC HWY H0656 28.04
S/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 35654 9TH AVE SW- 20.16
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 OS PV1/fR-OS/10 35896 PAC HWY S- 137.12
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 35909 1ST AVE SW FL 10.11
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 36111 16TH AVE S- 90.77
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-OS/10 36201 MILTON RD- 138.12
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWfR-08/10 36600 PAC HWY S^ 10.11
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWfR-08/10 491 S 338TH ST- 58.91
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWfR-08/10 727 S 312TH ST- 184.63
8l30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWfR-08/10 8TH AVE S& DASH PT 49.46
S/30/2010 PWfR 2010 OS PWfR-08/10 824 SW 361TH ST- 176.56
8l30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-OS/10 S 322N ST & 23 AVE 89.10
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 HWY 509 & 21STAVE 31.63
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 NE CRNR S 312TH & 2 174.86
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWTR-OS/10 S 304TH & MILITARY 72.87
8/30l2010 PWfR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 S 312TH & 23 AVE S- 160.64
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 S 314TH & 20TH AVE 115.70
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 S 320 SET & 32RD AV 216.31
8/30/2010 PWiR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 S 320TH & PAC HWY S 569.86
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 O8 PWTR-08/10 S 320TH & WEYHR WAY 226.69
8/30I2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 S 336TH ST & WEYHR 149.45
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 S 348TH ST & PAC HW 178.47
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 S 316TH & 20TH AVE 71.87
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 SR 161 & 356TH NE C 218.30
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 08 PWTR-OS/10 STAR LK RD & MILITA 41.52
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 SW CAMPUS DR 8 6TH 57.92
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 SW 308TH ST & 4 AVE 10.11
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 08 PWTR-08/10 SW 312TH ST & DASH 101.76
8/30/2010 PWfR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 SW 324TH & 11TH PL 190.82
8/30/20f0 PWTR 2010 OS PWfR-08/10 SW 340TH & HOYT RD 156.83
8/30/2010 PWTR 2010 OS PWTR-08/10 SW 340TH ST & 35TH 63.91
219416 9/15/2010 000602 PUGET SOUND INSTRUMENT CO INC, 1,140.38
8/31/2010 446234 PWST-BASESTATION FOR PKM BLDG 1,140.38
219417 9/15/2010 012442 RAMIREZ, LUI
8/24/2010 813781
219418 9/15/2010 012109 RASMUSSEN, COLLEEN A
5/12/2010 MARCH 15, 2005
219419 9/15/2010 001139 RED WING SHOE STORE,
8/26/2010 887004408
219420 9/15/2010 005508 SAFAROVA-DOWNEY, ALMIRA
8/24I2010 08/24/10
219421 9/15/2010 003726 SAFEWAY STORE #1555,
8/20/2010 1991465
5/13I2010 1932834
3/6l2010 1841278
8/31I2010 1991475
9/2l2010 1991477
8/27/2010 1991472
8/27/2010 1991474
219422 9/15/2010 012453 SAINT JACQUE, CHEYENNE
9/3/2010 817925
219423 9l15l2010 012443 SALINAS, MARCO
8/24/2010 813786
219424 9/15/2010 006415 SASE CO INC,
9/3/2010 ORD137765
PRCS-REFUND INSTRUCTOR CONFLIC
PRCS-N. LAKE ESTATES MITIGATIO
PKM-BOOT ALOW B.HIGGINS
MC-INTERPRETER SVC
PRCS-DINNER & A MOVIE SUPPLIES
PRCS-AROUND THE WORLO SUPPIIES
PRCS-PRESCHL SUPPLIES
PRCS-BON VOYAGE SUPPLIES
PRCS-COUNTRY HOEDOWN SUPPLIES
PRCS-IT'S A JUNGLE SUPPLIES
PRCS-SUPERHERO BINGO SUPPLIES
PRCS-REFUND 08/10 PAYMENT
PRCS-RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
PWST-CONCRETE GRINDER REPAIR
50.00
50.00
284.36
284.36
176.83
176.83
100.00
100.00
219.42
24.31
40.66
31.17
22.77
23.42
54.29
22.80
61.58
61.58
500.00
500.00
933.27
933.27
Bank of America Page 25 of 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Am ount C heck Total
219425 9/15/2010 010523 SBS OF AMERICA, 7,675.00
9/1/2010 25315 CHB-OS/10JANITORIALAG07-194 3,850.00
9/1l2010 25315 PKM-08/10 JANITORIAL SVC AG07- 150.00
8/1/2010 25216 DBC-07/10 JANITORIAL SVC AG10- 3,339.00
8/1/2010 25215 PKM-07l10 JANITORIAL SVC AG10- 336.00
219426 9/15/2010 010962 SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEMS, 36.70
8/27/2010 00080471 IT-08/10 PK-COPIER RPR, MNT, S 36.70
219427 9/15/2010 001014 SKCSRA-SOCCER REFEREES ASSOC, 3,300.00
9/1/2010 SEPTEMBER 1, 2010 PRCS-SOCCER REFEREE SVC AG10-0 1,600.00
9/1/2010 SEPTEMBER 1, 2010 A PRCS-SOCCER REFEREE SVC AG10-0 1,250.00
9/1l2010 SEPTEMBER 1, 2010 B PRCS-SOCCER REFEREE SVC AG10-0 450.00
219428 9/15/2010 000714 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY, 2,864.90
8/12/2010 2401022473 PRCS-07/10 SPORTS CAMP PROVIDE 308.70
7/29/2010 2401021026 PRCS-07/10 SPORTS CAMP PROVIDE 256.50
7/22/2010 2401020326 PRCS-07/10 SPORTS CAMP PROVIDE 730.10
7/14/2010 2401019559 PRCS-O6/10 SPORTS CAMP PROVIDE 313.60
8/24/2010 2401023610 PRCS-08/10 SPORTS CAMP PROVIDE 864.00
8/19/2010 2401023174 PRCS-07/10-08/10 SPORTS CAMP P 392.00
219429 9/15/2010 011810 SMITH, DILLON 1,843.10
9/1/2010 5 CM-04/10-06/10 CONFLICT DEFEND 1,843.10
219430 9/15/2010 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 6,877.64
7/29/2010 389741 PRCS-PRINT FALL 2010 BROCHURE 6,877.64
219431 9/15/2010 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 209.10
9/1/2010 383047 CM - COMMUNITY WEATHERIZATION 209.10
219432 9/15/2010 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 845.71
8/28/2010 398896 CD-COLTRIN PIER LEGAL NOTICE 136.99
8/14/2010 394862 CDHS-CDBG FUNDING MTG LEGAL AD 167.99
8/14/2010 394867 CD-BC CODE AMENDMENT LEGAL AD 98.78
8/4/2010 390188 CD-DUMAS BAY ALGAE LEGAL NOTIC 111.03
8/11/2010 393841 CD-TWIN LAKES SP NOA LEGAL NOT 131.20
8/11/2010 393845 CD-SMP HEARING LEGAL NOTICE 79.31
8/11/2010 393847 CD-CODE AMENDMENT HEARING LEGA 66.33
S/21/2010 396722 CD-COMP. PLAN LEGAL NOTICE 54.08
219433 9/15/2010 004910 SPACESAVER NORTHWEST, 199.07
8/26/2010 12001 CD-FILE FOLDERS & FILING SUPPL 199.07
219434 9/15/2010 001885 SPARKS CAR CARE, 3,951.73
8/27/2010 26482 PD-LOF 34.99
8/30/2010 26547 PD-LOF 55.83
8/30/2010 26551 PD-RADIATOR 568.78
8/25/2010 26529 PD-ELECTRICAL WORK 166.75
8/25l2010 26534 PD-BATTERY 224.42
8/25/2010 26536 PD-LOF 54.47
9/1l2010 26562 PD-TUNE UP 380.41
9/1/2010 26562 PD-WIPER BLADES 48.92
9/1/2010 26562 PD-ALIGNMENT 49.28
8/31/2010 26553 PD-ELECTRICAL WORK 498.61
8/31/2010 26560 PD-ELECTRICAL WORK 157.66
8/23l2010 26512 PD-ELECTRICAL WORK 68.04
8/20/2010 26505 PD-LOF 51.25
8/24l2010 26508 PD-TRANSMISSION 190.46
8/24l2010 26508 PD-ENGINE WORK 653.07
8/24/2010 26508 PD-LOF 34.99
8/24/2010 26514 PD-LOF 39.01
8l24/2010 26514 PD-ELECTRICAL WORK 29.08
8l24/2010 26514 PD-TRANSMISSION 51922
8/24l2010 26514 PD-TIRES 28.48
8/24/2010 26524 PD-TIRE REPAIR 19.71
8/24/2010 26526 PD-LOF 34.99
8/17/2010 26480 PD-WHEELS/RIM 43.31
219435 9/15/2010 008872 SPECTRA ANALYTICAL INC., DBA SPECTRA L 180.00
8/26/2010 59124 SWAA-LAB TEST SVCS 180.00
219436 9115/2010 004077 SPIRIT HALLOWEEN STORES, 25.00
8/26/2010 01-81259 REFUND FI-PD FOR REGULAR BL S/B TEMP 25.00
B ank of America Page 26 of 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
219437 9/15/2010 004701 SPRINT, 6,735.80
8/28/2010 400102318-105 IT-08/10 CELLULAR AIRTIME 3,233.18
8/28/2010 400102318-105 IT-08/10 CELLULAR AIRTIME 3,502.62
219438 9/15/2010 007438 SPRINT/ROTHHAMMER INT'L, 541.64
8/31/2010 687776 FWCC-ANTIFOG GOGGLES 310.80
8/17/2010 69065A FWCGFLOAT TUBES FOR THE LAZY 230.84
219439 9/15/2010 012451 ST. MARK'S CATHEDRAL, 150.00
8/31l2010 32195 DBC-RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 150.00
219440 9/15/2010 005594 STANLEY, JEAN 294.89
8/24l2010 STANLEY 2010 HR-WAPELRA CONF. J STANLEY 110.00
8/24l2010 STANLEY 2010 HR-WAPELRA CONF. J STANLEY 184.89
219441 9/15/2010 011454 STAPLES ADVANTAGE, 3,289.43
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 42.21
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 57.32
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 21.02
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 17.91
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 78.14
8l31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 17.79
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 17.79
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 88.04
8l31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 66.59
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 171.90
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 35.42
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 59.72
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 34.24
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 44.42
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 20'10 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 13.88
8/31l2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 115.30
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 58.30
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 74.02
8/31J2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 962.26
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 666.19
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 29.27
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 58.30
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 68.29
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 79.30
8l31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 147.95
8l31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 213.49
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 5.31
8/31/2010 104233800 AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPL 45.06
219442 9/15/2010 009566 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE, 137.62
8/28/2010 8016376742 PD-AUG 2010 OFFICE SUPPL�ES 137.62
219443 9/15l2010 010409 STEFOGLO, ALEX 469.60
8/26/2010 01-72372 REFUND PV�01-72372 ROW DEPOSIT REFUND 500.10
8/26/2010 01-72372 REFUND PW-01-72372 ROW DEPOSIT REFUND -30.50
219444 9/15/2010 011134 STENDER ZUMWALT, PLLC, 30,442.50
9/3/2010 182 CM-08l10 PUBLIC DEFENDER AG08- 30,442.50
219445 9/15l2010 005933 STUART PARKS ASSOCIATES, 695.00
9/4/2010 20577 PD-COMPOSITE DRAWING FOR PD 695.00
219446 9/15/2010 000308 SUBURBANCITIESASSOCIATION, 86.00
3/31/2010 1639 CGSCA MARCH 2O10 NETVVORKING D 86.00
219447 9/15/2010 000341 SUNRISE SELF STORAGE, 540.00
9/4/2010 JULY 2010 PD-08/10-09/10 #A1008 STORAGE 540.00
219448 9/15/2010 007710 SUPERIOR LINEN SERVICE, 17.53
8/30/2010 00358 DBGLINEN SERVICE 17.53
219449 9/15/2010 002521 SUPERLON PLASTICS INC, 6,694.57
S/26/20t0 10F3023 SWM-PIPE IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 1,819.79
8/31/2010 10F3078 SWM-PIPE IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 4,350.14
7/20/2010 10F2429 SWM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 524.64
219450 9/15/2010 009523 SYSTEMS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY, 1,118.04
8/13l2010 14590 PD-INSTALL JERK-N-RUN RADIO 680.42
8/13/2010 14591 PD-INSTALL CHARGE GUARD 275.90
8/20/2010 14639 PD-REPLC SIREN CONTROLLER 96.99
Bank of Am erica Page 27 of 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
S/27/2010 14712 PD-SWAP OUT POWER DOCK 64.73
219451 9/15/2010 00058$ TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES, 1,083.84
8/24/2010 700048250 DBC/KFT-08l10 DASH PT. RD- 726.17
8/24/2010 100048250 DBC/KFT-08/10 DASH PT. RD- 357.67
219452 9/15/2010 002176 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC, 10.31
8/24/2010 10051072 PKM-MISC HARDWARE 10.31
219453 9/15/2010 010525 TEST AMERICA LABORATORIES, 130.00
9/1l2010 55060458 SWM-LAB SUPPLIES 130.00
219454 9/15/2010 006033 THE FAB SHOP LLC, 7,373.70
8/25/2010 15792 PWST-UNDER BODY BOX INSTALLED, 1,493.83
8/25/2010 15793 PWST- INSTALL ALL BOXES AS QUO 4,240.37
S/25/2010 15794 PWST-REMOVE CRANE AND FUEL TAN 1,639.50
219455 9/15/2010 012445 THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR, 5,419.79
7/31/2010 JULY 2010 PD-07/10 ANIMAL SHELTER SVC AG 5,419.79
219456 9/15/2010 011186 THE WIDE FORMAT COMPANY, 215.51
9/2J2010 45129 IT-08/10 KIP SCANNER MAINT 215.51
219457 9/15I2010 010895 THERMAL SUPPLY, INC, 491.85
8/16/2010 297078 CH&REFR�GERANT FOR HVAC UNIT 491.85
219458 9/15/2010 009852 THERMO KING NORTHWEST INC, 263.44
8/12/2010 2061689-600 PWFLT-INSPECT & TROUBLE SHOOT 263.44
219459 9/15/2010 012447 THIRD ORDER SOCIETY OF, 300.00
8/23/2010 32136 DBC-RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND #517 150.00
S/23/2010 32137 DBC-RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND #518 150.00
219460 9/15/2010 004012 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP INC, 480.16
8/7/2010 5638620 LAW-FAIR LBR STANDARDS HNDBK 1 480.16
219461 9/15/2010 009280 THUNDERING OAK ENTERPRISES INC, 1,100.48
S/24/2010 4623 SWM-COTTONWOOD TREE REMOVAL 613.20
8/24/2010 4624 SWM-COTTONWOOD TREE REMOVAL 487.28
219462 9/15l2010 001424 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR INC, 400.30
8/1/2010 601238 CHB-08/10 ELEVATOR MAINT SVCS 200.15
9!1/2010 629990 CHB-09/10 LEVATOR MAINT SVCS 200.15
219463 9/15l2010 008902 TRI-CITY MEATS, 1,405.98
9/1/2010 236759 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 408.65
9/1/2010 236760 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 67.15
8/27/2010 236658 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 219.57
8/24/2010 236561 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 710.61
219464 9/15/2010 010071 TWIN LAKES HOMEOWNER'S ASSOC., 9,000.00
8/26/2010 AUGUST 2010 PWEOC-OS/10 EOC ASSISTANCE GRA 2,250.00
8/26/2010 AUGUST 2010 PWEOC-EOC ASSISTANCE GRANT AG1 6,750.00
219465 9/15/2010 002426 UNITED GROCERS CASH & CARRY, 623.46
8/28/2010 194654 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 27.93
8/28/2010 194883 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 103.66
8/29/2010 195001 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 40.10
8/30/2010 195224 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 35.05
8/25/2010 193677 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 65.34
9/2l2010 196063 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 143.30
8/31/2010 195498 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 36.16
8/31/2010 195616 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 60.95
8/24/2010 193365 DBC-CATERING SUPPLIES 110.97
219466 9/15/2010 010516 UNITED METHODIST CONFERENCE, 150.00
8/31/2010 32193 DBC-RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 150.00
219467 9/1512010 003837 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, 22.67
8/21/2010 OOOOF6588V340 PD-DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICE 22.67
219468 9/15l2010 000769 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY CO INC, 883.12
8/17/2010 8549093 FWCC-POP-UP ROTOR 142.35
8/17/2010 8549094 FWCC-POP-UP ROTOR 284.70
8/17/2010 8549095 FWCC-POP-UP ROTOR 456.07
219469 9/15/2010 005019 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC, 390.01
8/31l2010 89505374-001 PWST-BOOM LIFT-TRIM LIBRARY HE 361.11
8/25/2010 89422993-001 PWST-PROPANE 28.90
219470 9/15/2010 011806 UNIVERSAL REFRIGERATION INC, 271.01
8/23/2010 553831 FWCC-REFRIGERATION REPAIRS 271.01
Bank of Am erica
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice
219471 9/15l2010 001146 USSSA/SLO-PITCH SOFTBALL ASSOC,
9/1/2010 323
219472 9/15/2010 003563 VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER,
8/26/2010 0011354
S/26l2010 0011420
219473 9/15/2010 001124 VERIZON WIRELESS,
8/13I2010 0896834093
219474 9/15/2010 003528 WA STATE CRIMINAL JUSTICE,
8/24/2010 2011-0666
219475 9/15/2010 006876 WA STATE POLICE CANINE ASSOC,
9/9l2010 NOVAK REGISTER
219476 9/15/2010 000514 WA STATE-STATE REVENUES,
9/10/2010 AUGUST 10
9/10/2010 AUGUST 10
9/10l2010 AUGUST 10
9/10/2010 AUGUST 10
9/10/2010 AUGUST 10
9/10/2010 AUGUST 10
9/10/2010 AUGUST 10
9l10/2010 AUGUST 10
9/10/2010 AUGUST 10
9/10l2010 AUGUST 10
9/10/2010 AUGUST 10
219477 9/15/2010 002717 WASHINGTON FIRM LTD, THE
8/15/2010 110046
219478 9/15/2010 012448 WASHINGTON STATE CONVENTION,
8/23l2010 32139
219479 9/15/2010 012449 WASHINGTON, REMALIAH
8/23/2010 32142
219480 9/15/2010 000783 WASTE MANAGEMENT,
8/1/2010 1049851-1055-0
9/9/2010 1056985-1055-6
219481 9/15/2010 009995 WATER MANAGEMENT,
9/1/2010 93891
219482 9/15/2010 000541 WESTERN EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS,
9/1/2010 648050
8/13/2010 646073
8l12/2010 645756
8/12/2010 645797
8/24/2010 647051
219483 9/15/2010 011523 WHOLESALE SPORTS,
8/19/2010 150-00042
8/26/2010 150-00044
219484 9/15/2010 005805 WILLIAMS OIL FILTER SVC CO INC,
7/12/2010 925363
219485 9/15/2010 012441 WOLFHEIM, LINDA M
7/30/2010 1007043
219486 9/15/2010 000660 WOODWORTH & COMPANY INC,
8/11/2010 AG10-054 #5
219487 9/1512010 000660 WpODWORTH & COMPANY INC,
8/17/2010 204662
8/31/2010 204977
219488 9/15/2010 001206 WSSUA-WA STATE SOFTBALL UMPIRE,
9/1/2010 545
8/1/2010 521
219489 9l15/2010 001121 WWEE-WA WOMEN EMPLOY/EDUCATION,
8/31l2010 32194
219490 9l15/2010 005722 YAKIMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF,
8/12l2010 JULY 2010
8103793 9/8/2010 009467 US BANK,
8/25/2010 . AUGUST 2010
S/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
Description
PRCS-SOFTBALL REGISTRATION FAL
PD-Q2 2010 LANGUAGE IINE USAGE
PD-08/10 MDT USER FEE AG00-090
IT/PD-07/10 BOMB SQUAD CELLULA
PD-PATROL RIFLE INSTRUCTOR COU
PD-WSPCA CONF. NOVAK
FI-08/10 STATE PORTION REMIT F
FI-08/10 PSEA COURT FEES #2
FI-08/10 PSEA COURT FEES #3
FI-08/10 ACCESSCOMMACCT
FI-OS/10 MULTITRANSACCT
FI-OS/10 PSEA JIS FEES
FI-08/10 TRAUMA VICTIMS FEES
FI-08/10 SCHOOL ZONE SAFETY
FI-OS/10 AUTO THEFT PREV.
FI-08/10 BRAIN TRAUMA INJ
FI-08/10 SBCC SURCHARGE
HR-EXECUTIVE COACHING SVC
DBC-RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
DBC-RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
CD-SCHICK DEMO WASTE REMOVAL
SWR-08/10 LITTER DISPOSAL SVCS
SWM-LAB TEST SVCS
PWFLT-CASTER ASSY & KIT
PWFLT-BOLT KIT
PWFLT-RAKE PRONG
PWFLT-AIR FILTER & CLEANER
PWFLT-BALL JOINT ASM
PKM-WORK PANTS T.DICKINSON
PKM-BOOT ALLOW T.DICKINSON
PWFIT-FLEETRUNNER HD BELT
PD-NATL NIGHT OUT LIGHTBULBS
PWST-2010 ASPHALT OVERLAY AG10
PWST-ASPHA�T MIX
SWM-ASPHALT MIX
PRCS-SOFTBALL UMPIRES SVCS AG1
PRCS-SOFTBALL UMPIRES SVCS AG1
DBC-RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
PD-07l10 PRISONER LODGING AG02
PD-RIFLE SECURITY CABINET KEYS
PD-GANG PREVENTION TRNG LANSIN
Page 28 of 30
Amount Check Total
175.00
175.00
1,839.50
819.50
1,020.00
65.61
65.61
1,000.00
1,000.00
180.00
180.00
129,165.12
56,938.64
29,009.87
383.56
433.28
433.30
22,537.08
5,760.82
575.62
11,061.33
1,752.62
279.00
625.00
625.00
150.00
150.00
215.00
215.00
647.23
199.09
448.14
137.00
137.00
1,056.07
213.67
115.99
249.00
411.57
65.84
366.32
134.65
231.67
62.25
62.25
999.30
999.30
47,351.14
47,351.14
616.36
441.48
174.88
9,759.00
3,068.00
6,691.00
150.00
150.00
115,699.93
115,699.93
5,483.53
20.00
100.00
Bank of America Page 29 of 30
Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-ANIMAL CRUELTY INVESTIGATIN 100.00
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-CABLE TIES 23.67
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-NTOA CONF. ARBUTHNOT, CLARY 731.60
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-NTOA CONF. ARBUTHNOT, CLARY 1,819.44
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-NTOA CONF. ARBUTHNOT, CLARY -909.72
S/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-NTOA CONF. ARBUTHNOT, CLARY 1,000.00
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-LINE OF DUTY DEATH SMNR BER 199.00
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-BEHIND THE BADGE SMNR LANSI 89.00
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-SIGHT POST FOR PATROL RIFLE 46.00
S/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-SWAT EQUIP. 63.18
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-LOCKING COURIER BAGS 115.95
8l25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-MAJOR CASE MGMT TRNG ROBINS 311.43
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-NO HOMELESS PETS SMNR CROUC 275.00
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-FINGER PRINT SUPPLIES 41.45
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-NO HOMELESS PETS SMNR CROUC 357.40
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-NO HOMELESS PETS SMNR CROUC 309.48
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-NCDA DV CONF. D. DEYO 303.79
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-WIPER BLADES & LIGHT BULBS 90.25
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010 PD-THERMOSTAT CAMERA 396.61
8104759 9/7/2010 009507 US BANK,
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
S/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8l25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25l2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8125/2010
8/25l2010
8/25l2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
si2sizo�o
8/25/2010
8l25/2010
8/25/2010
sizsrzoi o
S/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8l25/2010
8/25/2010
8/25/2010
8l25/2010
8/25/2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST2010
AUGUST2010
AUGUST2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST2010
AUGUST2010
AUGUST2010
AUGUST2010
AUGUST2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
AUGUST 2010
FWCC-BASEBOARDS
FWCC-SWIM TEAM MEDALS
PRCS-DAY CAMP SUPPLIES
PRCS-DAY CAMP SUPPLIES
PRCS-CULTURES & CRAFTS SUPPLIE
FWCC-FITNESS EQUIPMENT REPAIRS
PRCS-TORCHLIGHT PARADE
PRCS-DAYCAMP SUPPLIES
PRCS-KID'S DAY ART SUPPLIES
PRCS-KARAOKE MACHINE
FWCC-GROUP POWER LICENSE
PRCS-LEWIS & CLARK CAMP TRIP
PRCS-STEWART HEIGHTS POOL TRIP
PRCS-LEWIS & CLARK CAMP TRIP
PRCS-DAY CAMP MARINERS GAME
FWCC-GROUP POWER aTR RELEASE
FWCC-TOOL BOX
FWCC-KID ESCAPE FOOD
FWCC-FIT CAMP MOVIE TICKET
FWCC-USP CHARGE R TOOT
PRCS-BRUNCH 8 A MOVIE
PRCS-LEWIS & CLARK CAMP TRIP
PRCS-DAY CAMP MOVIE TICKETS
PRCS-DINNER & A MOVIE
PRCS-SOFTBALL AWARDS
FI-ANNEXATION 101 C DONNELLY
MC-08/10 LANGUAGE LINE USAGE
FWCC/PRCS-ICE SKATING FIT CAMP
FWCC/PRCS-ICE SKATING FIT CAMP
FWCC-LIFEGUARDING CLASS MATL
PRCS-PT. TOWNSEND SENIOR TRIP
PRCS-BAINBRIDGE SENIOR TRIP
FWCC/PRCS-FUN CENTER FIT CAMP
FWCC/PRCS-FUN CENTER FIT CAMP
PRCS-RAILWAY MUSEUM SENIOR TRI
PRCS-SUQUAMISH MUSEUM SR. TRIP
FWCC/PRCS-SKYHIGH SPORTS FIT C
FWCC/PRCS-SKYHIGH SPORTS FIT C
PRCS-PATTY'S PLACE SENIOR TRIP
CC-LUNCH MTGS KOCHMAR & WILSON
CD-SAFETY VESTS - FIAGGING
PWTR-URBAN TRANSPORT SUBSCRIPT
PW-TRIANGLE PROJECT LUNCH
SWM-TROUT IN CLASSROOM SUPPLIE
85.41
154.38
160.99
68.99
103.35
588.87
11.95
219.90
93.17
144.51
685.00
217.78
600.00
19.41
1,456.00
29.00
299.58
48.03
24.00
13.42
161.00
206.02
1,026.00
30.00
as.ss
125.00
169.85
20.00
20.00
5.28
4.00
13.10
95.82
95.81
108.00
27.00
49.50
49.50
179.94
41.29
45.74
295.00
54.66
1,048.49
10,102.92
Bank of Am erica
Check No. Date Vendor
8109491 9/7/2010 011218 US BANK,
31 544018 9/1 3l2010
Inv Date Invoice
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/2512010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25I2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8l25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25I2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25l2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25l2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8/25/2010 AUGUST 2010
8l25/2010 AUGUST 2010
000061 WA STATE REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
9l13l2010 601-223-5385
9/13/2010 601-223-5385
9/13/20'10 601-223-5385
9/13/2010 601-223-5385
9/13/2010 601-223-5385
9/13/2010 601-223-5385
9/13/2010 601-223-5385
9/13/2010 601-223-5385
9/13/2010 601-223-5385
Description
CD-WABO IBC BOOKS
CC-08/03/10 COUNCIL DINNER
LAW-ROZNOWSKI DEPOSITION PEARS
PWST/SWM-WATER PUMP
PWST/SWM-WATER PUMP
CDHS-GRANT MANAGEMENT TRNG
PKM-FWCC ARTWORK LIGHT REPAIR
PKM-TOOLS FOR VOLUNTEER TRAILE
PKM-TOOLS FOR VOLUNTEER TRAILE
PKM-TRACTOR RENTAL LAURELWOOD
PKM-LITTER GETTERS
PKM-CORD/HOSE PROTECTORS
CHB-FLAGS
PKM-SAFETY SIGNS - DECK SIGNS
CM-AWC LUNCH MEETING CM STAFF
CM-BUDGET LUNCH MTG MGMT TEAM
CM-BUDGET LUNCH MTG MGMT TEAM
CD-08/10 PASSPORT MAILINGS
CM-TELLY AWARD CERTIFICATE FRA
HR-NPELRA ACADEMY J STANLEY
HR-WAPELRA CONF. MCDOUGAL STAN
HR-IPMA TRNG CONF. MCDOUGAL
SWM-STORM FILTER MAINT/REPAIR
SWM-STORM FILTER MAINT/REPAIR
DBC-PANIC ALARM BATTERIES
DBC-WIRED MICROPHONE
PD-BAIT CAR WINDOW TINTING WAT
PWEOC-CERT QUICK SHELTERS
PWEOC-CERT QUICK SHELTERS
IT-UPS BATTERY BACKUP
IT-HEAT SINK ARETIC SILVER
IT-SAFE CITY POWER BOX
FI-08/10 REMIT USE TAX -
FI-08/10 REMIT SALES TAX
FI-08/10 REMIT SALES TAX-FWCC
FI-08/10 REMIT SALES TAX DBC
FI-O8f10 REMIT SALES TAX FWCC
FI-08/10 REMIT SVC TAX/PW STOR
FI-OS/10 REMIT SALES TAX DBC
FI-08/10 REMIT SALES TAX DBC
FI-08/10 REMIT EXC TAX (ROUNDI
Page 30 of 30
Amount Check Total
780.47
96.63
241.40
5,411.73
53.49
53.49
50.00
126.49
250.43
122.41
273.31
339.46
691.50
17.05
79.63
53.13
50.77
9.95
177.24
13.13
399.00
320.00
275.00
100.66
328.60
56.91
32.84
173.49
677.38
61.32
109.49
22.96
492.60
732.49
28.23
9,960.71
6,007.11
1,819.51
622.7'I
3,333.23
-3,333.23
-0.01
19,171.05
Total Checks Issued 478 Total E2,992,448.48
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 5, 2010
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
ITEM #:
SUBJECT: CONTRACT EXTENSION FOR FEDERAL LOBBYIST
POLICY QUESTION Should the City of Federal Way extend the federal lobbying contract with
Strategies 360 for the current budgeted amount of $72,500 per year.
COMMITTEE Finance, Economic Development, Regional Affairs
CATEGORY:
� Consent
❑ Ordinance
❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution
STAFF REPORT BY: Linda Farmer Government Affairs l
Overview
MEETING DATE: Sept. 28, 2010
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
DEPT City Manager
The City has retained federal lobbying assistance for six years. The City hired Smith Alling Lane (now
Gordon Thomas Honeywell) in March 2005 and extended the contract three times through January
2009.
The City re-bid the contract in January 2009. Strategies 360 was the successful bidder and, in March
2009, the City of Federal Way entered into an 18-month contract with the firm. Per Council Member
Mike Park's request—and as approved at the March 3, 2009, City Council meeting--the City entered into
an 18-month contract with Strategies 360 with the purpose of considering a two-year contract extension during
the City's biennial budget process for 2011-2012. It is also helpful to take care of contract issues and
potential scope of work changes during the least busy times of the Congressional season (July/August).
Cost
Staff recommends the cost of the contract extension not exceed the budgeted amount of $72,500 per
year ($145,000 per biennium).
Highlights of the current contract with Strategies 360
In your packets is a report from Strategies 360 on work performed during this time period. Highlights
include:
• Orchestrated the City's annual lobbying trip to DC in March 2010.
• Coordinated the FY2011 appropriations application process with three Congressional offices.
Asked for $2.7M for the Triangle Project. Won support from Sen. Cantwell and Rep. Smith but
the item was not ultimately included in the Senate's version of the THUD bill.
• Closely monitored the SAFETEA-LU reauthorization process, which has been extended through
the end of 2010.
• Helped facilitate the passage of the EB-5 Visa program Regional Center designation via
Congressional letters of support and phone calls.
Provided the City with a list of federal grant opportunities for the PACC that can be pursued
pending site control.
Orchestrated representation by Rep. Smith at the Triangle groundbreaking event on Aug. 11,
2010.
Scope of work
Staff recommends that the very specific 2009/2010 scope of work be changed to focus on more general
guidelines for the new contract period. Specific legislative agenda items would be moved out of the
scope of work section and into the City's annual Legislative Agenda document. This is the format that
the City has been following with the State lobbying contract.
Attachments:
• 2010 Accomplishments Report provided by Strategies 360
• Proposed contract amendment documents
• Current 18-month contract with Strategies 360
Options Considered:
1) Authorize a two-year contract extension for Strategies 360 not to exceed the budgeted amount.
2) Authorize a one-year contract extension for Strategies 360 not to exceed the budgeted amount.
3) Reject the contract extension and provide staff with alternate direction.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Council Member Mike Park recommends approval of Option 1.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: (�� � �I�� .U.1��^ �' DIRECTOR APPROVAL: � •
Committee Council ommitt Council
�•�.1�
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION I move to forward the proposed Amendment to the October S 2010, consent
agenda for approval. -• � „ � �
Member
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION "I move app�6val of the Strategies 360 Amendment, covering September 1,
2010 through September 30, 2012 with a total compensation of $145,000, and authorize the City Manager to
sign said agreement. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED
❑ DElVIED
� TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
REVISED — 08/12/2010
COUNCIL BILL #
1 reading
Enactment
reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
�,�- ti� ° r��" ' e
� � � 4 � �
� � � `
� �� ,
,� � c � '`*°,� � `°� �`"' ��� '����` x
� � � � "°� �, `� ���3�,�'�
��"��..,� � �', e �� � �.
����� d � ��` � Y � .
�� +a'".� �' f * d �.�, '�,�, '
w. . �� �0�3�i � � s
� _ �,;� �k .��it� `i � ��
w;�:.
�I�'.;.[ z`� 'v � a ��, _ " "�'� q�
� � �: � ���� �� � ` . �� � aa �� .
� ��� �� ��,��
� ��
��� � � ���—
��
� �� o�c�„-�
a_ �. .�� .� �, �� �� �� ��� � �� �� _ o
��� �
� �'
p .��
� ��
� �.
, � �
W� �$ '
�� �
� � � ��
,�
�:
F� �- a: i`'
'�� c .. . . . .
• .«
� � ,
�%� . ,. , , - . . . . . . � .. . � . . . ..
��. s ° � _
,.� = I. �ti� ; �-.;��.,�'c%'= `"; .
�, '� q
� . � �, � w
� ` `�`�� m � °'
� � � � � � �a �����`� . ��
� x ��,4 � ° ��5�
e a .;#�i�3��` ���'« .. �. .. � e* �n,r��.,'��" _ .
,�
�:, �
� ��
" � � _ ° e � ` ' � . e ` � � ilii�Gc �
�; =st� �a� ' �.+� :;a+ �, �r�a,',
�_,_
v„
�.. � � r � � a
m � �,k ^�� a .. 4' �� �� �
�� _ A�u� .,. �s�� � �
s�y a �
STRAT�G � E
. � ,
� � � � � �� g ����'��'� ��
r ��� . �
� � b � �
� �`
������ � ��
'�" � �=�;.
. . s,.,..., '`�r-,�,��.-`, , � .
3300 M. St. NW, Suite 202
Washington, DC 20007
(202) 333-2234
�
����
��.
�`s �' ""` ��
}
� ����
� ��
r t,
�
�' � �
�
w s
� � s � � � �, � � '
,
� .�: � � �
,.
_ � � _��, � , � li.n„ � :.
„ ���._,�� a ,.
�
� ,� � � � � ,� �
��.' � � � w
�
J
Strategies 360 Proposal to
The City of Federal Way
july 29, 2010
Strategies 360, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal to continue federal representation services for the
City of Federal Way. As a Seattle-based public affairs and strategic communications firm with more than
a twenty-five year history representing a wide range of public sector, non-profit, and corporate clients,
Strategies 360 is confident we offer an unparalleled level of service to the City of Federal Way. We look
forward to discussing this proposal.
OVERVIEW
In March of 2009, Strategies 360 was hired by the City of Federal Way to provide federal government
relations services. At that time the City of Federal Way had submitted federal appropriations requests to
Sens. Murray, Cantwell, and Rep. Smith. 5360 developed one-page handouts for each of the projects and
set up meetings for the City of Federal Way with both the DC and Washington State offices of the
Congressional Delegation. The City was successful in gaining the support of Sen. Murray for all three
projects, and Rep. Smith for the Triangle project, but due to the competitiveness of the process the
projects did not end up receiving funding.
Since that time 5360 has worked closely with City of Federal Way staff to educate Members of Congress,
Congressional staff, Federal Agency officials, and state officials on the City's priorities. S360 has promoted
the Triangle Project to Members of Congress for funding through a variety of sources. The City of Federal
Way's economic development initiatives have been introduced to both Members of Congress and
Executive Branch officials. S360 has also closely monitored and provided advice to the City of Federal
Way on the pending Department of Justice case regarding federal agency use of municipalities' storm
water systems. Furthermore, S360 has used its in-depth knowledge of the federal, state, and private
grants system to provide regular updates to the City of Federal Way on funding opportunities. The City of
Federal Way has further developed their relationships with Members of Congress and their staff through
the close relationships S360 holds with these offices.
Moving forward S360 proposes to assist the City of Federal Way in continuing to raise its profile on the
federal level, compete more effectively for federal dollars, and protect and promote its legislative
priorities.
a Strategies 360 • 3300 M Street, NW • Suite 202 p Washington, DC 20007 • 202.333.2234 �
T & P W QRKS
_ _ _.��___ _ ___�__ __ � _ .
What Has Been Accomplished
> The Triangle Project gained the backing of Senator Cantwell in 2010 and gained priority in
Representative Smith's list, rising to the top of his transportation requests.
P Members of Congress and their staff have been further educated about the project and its progress
and have taken site visits with the City's Engineer.
� Members of Congress, Governor Gregoire, the Office of Financial Management, and WSDOT have
participated in meetings to discuss the opportunity to fund the Triangle Project through the next
surface transportation authorization bill.
> The City of Federal Way has been updated and advised as to the progress of a case before the
Department of Justice which involves the dispute of the federal government paying for the use of
storm water facilities that its agency buildings use. The City has supported the on-going payment of
use fees by the federal government through the Association of Washington Cities.
� Regular updates have been provided on funding opportunities from the Recovery Act, jobs bills, and
regularly occurring grants programs.
Looking Forward
� Based on the gaining momentum of support for the Triangle Project, 5360 recommends resubmitting
the project for the FY2012 funding cycle.
> S360 will closely monitor the surface transportation authorization bill and engage Members of
Congress and their staff on opportunities to support the Triangle Project through that legislation. The
current bill has been e�ended through the end of 2010 and a new bill is expected to be taken up in
either 2011 or 2012.
' New grant programs, jobs and infrastructure bills, as well as remaining Recovery Act funding will be
closely monitored to provide other opportunities to fund the Triangle Project.
> Members of Congress and their staff will be invited to the groundbreaking of the Triangle Project.
ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELCIPMENT
What Has Been Accomplished
> The City of Federal Way successfully applied for and received the Regional Center designation under
the EB-5 visa program, allowing foreign nationals to gain residency through significant investment
and job creation within the United States. S360 helped facilitate this process by securing a letter of
support and phone calls from Members of Congress.
� 5360 has opened doors for the City of Federal Way to coordinate with the International Trade
Administration at the Department of Commerce on the proposed marketing trip to Korea.
> Federal Way Mayor Linda Kochmar met with Housing and Urban Development Deputy Secretary Ron
Sims and discussed the residential green-retrofit program.
� S360 has provided a memo outlining grant opportunities for the construction of the Performing Arts
Center.
� Regular updates have been provided on funding opportunities from the Recovery Act, the jobs bill,
and regularly occurring grants programs. The City of Federal Way directly received nearly $1 million
through the Recovery Act for energy efficiency programs and law enforcement.
p Strategies 360 • 3300 M Street, NW � Suite 202 g Washington, DC 20007 < 202.333.2234 •
Looking Forward
� S360 will continue to engage the Department of Commerce about ways to enhance and promote the
City of Federal Way's proposed marketing trip to Korea.
► Grant opportunities for construction of the Performing Arts Center will continue to be closely
monitored and updates will be provided.
� 5360 will strategize ways to engage federal officials and secure funding for further economic and
community development projects in the City of Federal Way.
STRATEGIES 360: WHO WE ARE
Today, Strategies 360 is the region's premiere strategic communications firm. We are focused on helping
our clients succeed in today's complex business and public policy environment, providing comprehensive
and coordinated expertise in public policy, government relations, business and marketing strategy, public
relations, communications, and strategic positioning. The one-of-a-kind Strategies 360 approach offers
clients the opportunity to combine an array of services that complement one another or to choose an
effort focused in a particular service area. Either way, clients gain access to the complete S360 team of
experts.
Strategies 360 believes that the key to a successful government relations campaign is to integrate efforts
in Washington, DC and Washington state = to support talented federal lobbyists with powerful in-state
resources. We field a team that embodies this belief and will help the City of Federal Way achieve
success. The combined experience of the S360 team provides unparalleled access to the Washington
congressional delegation and other key leaders in Washington, DC.
Strategies 360's experienced, robust, and deeply-connected team includes Ron Dotzauer in Seattle and
Tylynn Gordon and Melanie Mihara in Washington, DC.
' RON DOTZAUER, CO-FOUNDER & CEO
With sharply honed instincts in political � �� � �, ��,.��
strategy and a winning track record, Ron �� �`° �
Dotzauer is a highly-sought political ��� ���� � ' � �° �'� � �' � �
strategist. At Strategies 360, Ron provides �
strategic counsel to a vast array of � ����
regional and international clients. Ron's
more than 30-year career in politics
started in 1974, when he became the
youngest elected county official in the
state of Washington. With an unbeatable track record for winning campaigns, Ron shares his insight and
skills at campaign workshops all over the United States and beyond. In 1989, he traveled to the Baltic
States to help prepare candidates for the region's first free elections. And in 2008, he spent time in
Mongolia helping first-time female candidates campaign for office. In 2000, Ron stunned national political
observers by leading Maria Cantwell to a victory in the U.S. Senate over a three-term incumbent. Ron was
an integral part of four national presidential conventions - both Democratic and Republican. He provided
R Strategies 360 a 3300 M Street, NW • Suite 202 m Washington, DC 20007 • 202.333.2234 •
�
around-the-clock political analysis for several media outlets. Ron is the person the media turn to for
quick-witted and accurate commentary on politics at all levels.
� TYLYNN GORDON, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT FEDERAL RELATIONS
Tylynn serves Strategies 360 as senior vice
president of federal relations. With experience
in strategic consulting, government service, and �`�
political campaigns, Tylynn provides superior
service to S360 clients. She has ties to current '
Democratic leadership, including Senate
Finance Chairman Max Baucus, for whom she
served as the former state finance director of
his fundraising operation. Her government service includes time as the deputy state auditor for the state
of Montana where she developed legislative strategy and guided passage of 21 pieces of key legislation.
Tylynn also founded an independent consulting firm that handled strategic planning, recruiting and
grassroots lobbying efforts at the national level. There, she created grassroots strategies for
organizations seeking federal legislation on rural broadband access and helped the Competitive Long
Distance Coalition gain approval for their federal telecommunications initiative. She served on the
campaigns of Senator Ben Nelson and Governor Kathleen Sebelius and maintains close ties with Senator
Tim Johnson and Senator Jon Tester. Tylynn's mastery of grassroots politics and her network of federal
government contacts enable her to lend crucial insight to S360's clients. Tylynn earned her Bachelor of
Arts in political science from Northern Arizona University.
► MELANIE MIHARA, SENIOR FEDERAL RELATIONS ASSOCIATE
Grants and appropriations specialist Melanie
Mihara serves as Strategies 360's Senior Federal
Relations Associate in the Washington, D.C. ���
��
office. Melanie's in-depth knowledge of federal >> ��� �
funding programs allows her to give insightful,
well-informed advice to S360 clients in Alaska, �;�'`
Montana, Oregon and Washington State, helping
clients find and apply for federal dollars. Melanie joined S360 after four years with Senator Maria
Cantwell, where she served as Appropriations and Grants Coordinator, advising on appropriations
requests, drafting request letters and advocating for requests with the Senate Appropriations Committee.
During her tenure, Melanie also assisted municipalities, tribes, educational institutions and non-profit
organizations in finding and applying for federal grants and loans. Melanie also completed a
Congressional Research Service institute program on the federal budget process. The seminar focused on
budget resolutions and reconciliation, the appropriations process and the presidential budget. Melanie
has also completed a series of grant writing classes from the Foundation Center on topics including
proposal writing, proposal budgeting, and grantmaker relationship building. She graduated from
Vanderbilt University with a Bachelor of Arts degree in mathematics and political science.
w Strategies 360 r 3300 M Street, NW g Suite 202 # Washington, DC 20007 6 202.333.2234 •
r�T� �'t� � �� P-sKLL
�^ � z�n CY � s n :c '�r_:£:€`t �-": � �x �3 � ' o
�s����# :'���, �;,h �ti�3: ;-�. 3�;
•`��++,'��5. . . .. Y . � � . . .
f.�c. ��� �.�r — (�S:t;�
.:>..�..N'
,�>;':Y.i,ey.: s?1Y^�:'t3?:Yrirl.s.,^.i?�
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR
FEDERAL LOBBYIST
This Amendment ("Amendment No. 1") is made between the City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal
corporation ("City"), and Strategies 360, a Washington Corporation ("Contractor"). The City and Contractor
(together "Parties"), for valuable consideration and by mutual consent of the parties, agree to amend the original
Agreement for Legislative Lobbying Services ("Agreement") dated effective March 13, 2009.
L AMENDED TERM. The term of the Agreement, as referenced by Section 2 of the Agreement and any
prior amendments thereto, shall be amended and shall continue until the completion of the Services, but in any event
no later than September 30, 2012 ("Amended Term").
2. AMENDED SERVICES. The Services or Work, as described in E�ibit "A" and as referenced by Section 2
of the Agreement, shall be amended to include, in addition to work and tern�s required under the original Agreement
and any prior amendments thereto, those additional services described in Exhibit "A-1" attached hereto and
incorporated by this reference ("Additional Services").
3. AMENDED COMPENSATION. The amount of compensation, as referenced by Section 4 of the
Agreement, shall be amended to include the following: In return for the Services during the Amended Term, the City
sha11 pay the Contractor an additional amount not to exceed One Hundred Forty-five Thousand and No/100 Dollars
($145,000.00). The total amount payable to the Contractor pursuant to the original Agreement and this Amendment
shall be an amount not to exceed Two Hundred Fifty Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($250,000.00).
4. GENERAL PROVISIONS. All other terms and provisions of the Agreement, together with any prior
amendments thereto, not modified by this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect. Any and all acts done by
either Party consistent with the authority of the Agreement, together with any prior amendments thereto, after the
previous expiration date and prior to the effective date of this Amendment, is hereby ratified as having been
performed under the Agreement, as modified by any prior amendments, as it existed prior to this Amendment. The
provisions of Section 13 of the Agreement shall apply to and govern this Amendment. The parties whose names
appear below swear under penalty of perjury that they are authorized to enter into this Amendment, which is binding
on the parties of this contract.
[Signature page follows]
AMENDMENT 1 /2010
��'T'� ��
��� . �� ..� . .. . -.
�:�1` �^;�LL
J �GCt r.f . .�'acl�`�''.:� �JS_;L:�4': ` �:_: .�.!iY. ''.3? �i0
�S� i�i'£3� .� * lh Q��:1.s-"ki 3,
t� +.5�� OM�.�.°(��i':t
��'{1:Y?;ij'::i:f?fY��i'c3. f,.^.i?}
IN WITNESS, the Parties execute this Agreement below, effective the last date written below.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
By:
Brian Wilson, City Manager/Police Chief
DATE:
STRATEGIES 360
By:
Printed Name:
Title:
DATE:
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Carol McNeilly, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney, Patricia A Richardson
On this day personally appeared before me , to me known to be the
of that executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for
the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument
and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation.
GIVEN my hand and official seal this day of
20
Notary's signature
Notary's printed name
My commission eapires
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington.
AMENDMENT 1/2010
r�T'� �3�
�� �
L::T`t� P
;i xG� �t � e*�i� t8 ::r•�3Yt't � 'r' � Ee:.r, � r � o
�r'�."���"�� : 4 rS� :Z%�'A�:7 :°:f . �f:
� (,.�c. �� O�� 1+�3u;�
� ,.:�.,,..,ar
,� �:�h' �., � y ..;.s"Y•.�s't3.':3�>.'r�i S:.
EXHIBIT "A-1" — SERVICES
FEDERAL LOBBYIST
CONTRACTOR will provide the City with comprehensive federal representation and will work with the City
Manager or Mayor and/or staff designee to develop and implement both a short-term and long range federal
relations strategy in support of City projects, policies and programs that are influenced or supported by federal
policies and funding.
Specific duties include:
• Coordinate at least one visit per year of City of Federal Way officials to Washington, D.C. for lobbying
purposes.
• Coordinate at least one visit per year by the CONTRACTOR to the City of Federal Way to present at a
mutually-agreed upon City Council meeting.
• Coordinate the annual federal appropriations (earmark) application process.
• Coordinate City requests for funding through major reauthorization bills such as SAFETEA-LU.
• Identify opportunities and complete applications for federal grants appropriate to the City.
� Seek federal support through policies, regulation or funding for issues of concern to the City.
• Design and implement an outreach plan to bring Members of Congress and Congressional staff to Federal
Way for further discussion and educati.on on the needs and opportunities for federal support of the City's
priorities, as appropriate.
• Provide regular status reports (email is acceptable) at least monthly; and a comprehensive written report
at the end of each Session of Congress summarizing accomplishments, and recommending goals and
strategies to guide the City and the CONTRACTOR in the ne� Session of Congress.
• Provide updates, strategy development and coordination via regular email communications, phone calls
and conference meetings with City staff, including phone conference presentations at the Finance,
Economic Development And Regional Affairs City Council Committee when appropriate (meets 4�'
Tuesday of the month at 5:30 p.m.)
AMENDMENT 1 /2010
.� �
`
c�rr oF �./
Federal Way
33325 8th Ave. South
P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
VENDOR: 011356
STRATEGIES 360, INC
1505 WESTLAKE AVE N., STE 1000
SEATTLE, WA 98109
FOB Point:
Terms: Net 30
Req. Dei. Date:
, Special inst: CM-AG09-048 FEDERAL LOBBYIST
CM-AG09-048 FEDERAL LOBBYIST
3/9/09 - 8/31/201�
CM-AG09-048 FEDERAL LOBBYIST
3/9/09 - 8/31/2010
CM-AG09-048 FEDERAL LOBBYIST
3/9/09 - -8/31/2-010
BILL TO: �-ITY OF FEDERAL WAY
33325 8TH AVE SOUTH
PO BOX 9718
FEO�R�.L w�Y, wA 98063-9718
Aceount;Number,
E 001-1100-021-513-10-410
E 306-4400-000-597-44-552
R 001-0000-020-397-10-005
' Amount
105,000.00
105,000.00
-105,000.00
Page 1 / 1
D,4TE ` PO"NfJMBER
3/27/2009 060422
SHIP TO: FEDERAL WAY CITY HALL
33325 8TH AVE SOUTH
PO BOX 9718
FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718
Req. No.:
Dept.: MUNICIPAL COURT START-UP
ContaCt: LINDA FARMER
Confirming? Yes
Accoi
SUBTOTAL
TAX
FREIGHT
TOTAL
105,000.00
105,000.00
105,000.00-
105,000.00
0.00
0.00
105,000.00
Authorized Signature , Authorized Signature (over $1,000)
TO:
C�� �3
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY LAW DEPARTMENT -___
REQUEST FOR CONTRACT PREPARATION/DOCUMENT REVIEW/SIGNATURE ROUTIIYG SLIP
1. ORIGINATING DEPT./DIV: C
ORIGINATiNG STAFF PERS01�1: L1� `�m� EXT: ���_ 3. DATE REQ. BY:s��/��p [�"J_
T "/ '
TYj'E OF DOCUMENT REQUESTED (CHECK ONE)
(�PROFESS[ONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
❑ MAINTENANCE/LABORAGREEMENT
❑ PUBL[C WORKS CONTRACT
❑ SMALL PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
(LESS THr�N $200,000)
❑ PURCFIASE AGREEMENT�
(MATERIALS, SUPPLIES, EQU(PMENl')
❑ REAL ESTATE DOCUMENT
5. PROJECT NAME:
6. NAME OF CONTRA(
ADDRESS: � SO S I
SIGNATURE I�IAME:
❑ SECURITY DOCUMENT (E.c. ncaEeMErrr &
PERF/MAIN BOND; ASSIGNMENi' OF FUNDS IN LIEU OF BOND)
❑ CONTRACTOR SELECTION DOCUMENT
(E.G., RFB. RFP� RFQ)
❑ CONTRACT AMENDMEI�IT AG#:
❑ CDBG
❑ OTHER
OoU
TELEPHOI�IE
�
7. ATTACH ALL EXHIBITS AND CHECK BOXES �SCOPE OF SERVICES ❑ ALL EXHIB[TS REFERE[�(CED IN DOCUMENT
�INSURANCE CERI'[FICATE ❑ DOCUMENT AUTHORIZING S[GNATURE
S. TERM: COMMENCEMENT�DATE: ►"\G�� 1, Z� 1 COMPLET[ON DATE: v� ��� �
9. TOTAL COMPENSATION $�� D✓, �• v" �[NCLUDE EXPENSES AND SALES TAX, [F ANY�
([F CALCULATEU ON HOURLY LABOR RGE -ATTACH SCHEDULES OF EMPLOYEES T[TLES AND HOL[DAY RATES
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSE: �ES ❑ No [F vES MAXIMUM DOLLAR AMOUNT: $ ��(> .��
[S SALES TAX O WED ❑ YES NO [F YES, $ PA[D BY: ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ C[TY
❑ PURCHASING: PLEASE CHAR�E TO: Sf e A,�'�P� eMGt�� 1
10. CO
[9'PROJECT MANAGER
❑ DIRECTOR
❑ RISK MANAGEMENT ([F nPP[,tCag[.E)
� LAW
I 1. �NTRACT SIGNATURE ROUT[NG
LAW DEPARTMENT
CITY MANAGER
CITY CLERK
SIGN COPY BAC TO ORG �ATING DEPT.
❑ ASS[GNED AG# �9 - D `��
COMMENTS
1NITIAL/DATE AP PRO V ED
3 . �}.09
�✓ �! � � n, C �►«ls
-f-o 6c e� k( Z�c c pe.�c as �y
INIT AL/DAT��AYPROV
b�!^ ?j/ "� ,
�
C�YY1 �-2(Q't
�m 2c�� d`1
[N[TIAL/DATE APPRO V ED
[NIT[AL/DATE APPRO V ED
Ozio8
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE5 AGREEMENT
FOR
FEDERAL LOBBYIST
This Professional Services Agreement ("Agreement") is dated effective this 9` day of March,
2009. The parties ("Parties") to this Agreement are the City of Federal Way, a Washington
municipal corporation ("City"), and Strategies 360, a Washington Corporation ("Contractor").
A. The City seeks the temporary professional services of a skilled independent contractor
capable of working without direct supervision, in the capacity of federal lobbying; and
B. The Contractor has the requisite skill and experience necessary to provide such
services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Par#ies agree as follows:
l. Services
Contractor shall provide the services more specifically described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and
incorporated by this reference ("Services"), in a manner consistent with the accepted practices for
other similar services, performed to the City's satisfaction, within the time period prescribed by the
City and pursuant to the direction of the City Manager or his or her designee.
Term
The term of this Agreement shall commence upon the effective date of this Agreement and
shall continue until the completion of the Services, but in any event no later than August 31, 2010.
("Term"). This Agreement may be extended for additional periods of time upon the mutual written
agreement of the City and the Contractor.
Termination
Prior to the expiration of the Term, ihis Agreement may be terminated immediately, with or
without cause, by the City.
4. Compensation_
4.1 Total Compensation. In consideration of the Contractor performing the
Services, the City agrees to pay the Contractor an amount not to exceed One Hundred Five
Thousand and No/100 Do(lars ($105,000.00) calculated as follows:
Rev 12/08
s
(i) Contractor's Fee. Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($5,000.00) per
month, for an amount not to exceed the sum of Ninety Thousand and No/100
Dollars ($90,000.00)
(ii) Reimbursable Expenses. The actual customary and incidental
expenses incurred by Contractor in performing the Services including long
distance charges, copying charges, postage or other delivery charges,
reasonable travel costs and necessary entertainment, and other reasonable
costs; provided, however, that such costs shall be deemed reasonable in the
City's sole discretion and shall not exceed Fifteen Thousand and No/100
Dollars ($15,000.00). All expenses projected to be over Two Hundred and
No/ 100 Dollars ($200.00) shall be presented to the City for pre-authorization.
4.2 Method of Payment. Payment by the City for the Services will only be made
after the Services have been performed, a voucher or invoice is submitted in the form
specified by the City, and the same is approved by the appropriate City representative.
Payment shall be made on a monthly basis, thirty (30) days after receipt of such voucher or
invoice.
4.3 Contractor Responsible for Taxes. The Contractor shall be solely responsible
for the payment of any taxes imposed by any lawful jurisdiction as a result of the
performance and payrnent of this Agreement.
5. Compliance with Laws.
Contractor shall comply with and perform the Services in accordance with all applicable
federal, state, and City laws including, without limitation, all City codes, ordinances, resolutions,
standards and policies, as now existing or hereafter adopted or amended.
6. Warranty.
The Contractor warrants that it has the requisite training, skill and experience necessary to
provide the Services and is appropriately accredited and licensed by ali applicable agencies and
governmental entities, including but not limited to being registered to do business in the City of
Federal Way by obtaining a City of Federal Way business registration.
7. Independent Contractor/Conflict of Interest.
7.1 It is the intention and understanding of the Parties that the Contractor shall be an
independent contractor and that the City shall be neither liable nor obligated to pay Contractor sick
leave, vacation pay or any other benefit of employment, nor to pay any social security or other tax
which may arise as an incident of employment_ The Contractor shall pay all income and other taxes
due. Industrial or any other insurance that is purchased for the benefit of the City, regardless of
whether such may provide a secondary or incidental benefit to the Contractor, shall not be deemed to
Rev l2/08
convert this Agreement to an employment contract. It is recognized that Contractor may or will be
performing professional services during the Tertn for other parties; provided, however, that such
performance of other services shall not conflict with or interfere with Contractor's ability to perform
the Services. Contractor agrees to resolve any such conflicts of interest in favor of the City.
7.2 If the Contractor is a sole proprietorship or if this is a contract with an individual, the
contractor agrees to notify the City and complete any required form if the Contractor retired under a
State of Washington retirement system and agrees to indemnify any losses the City may sustain
through the Contractor's failure to do sa
Indemnification
8.1 Contractor Indemnification. The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and
hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from
any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (inciuding costs and all attorney
fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, including, without limitation, their respective
agents, licensees, or representatives, arising from, resulting from, or connected with this
Agreement to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Contractor,
its partners, shareholders, agents, employees, or by the Contractor's breach of this
Agreement. Contractor waives any immunity that maybe granted to it under the Washington
State Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW. Contractor's indemnification shall not be
li�ited in any way by any limitation on the amount of damages, compensation or benefits
payable to or by any third party under workers' compensation acts, disability benefit acts or
any other benefits acts or programs.
8.2 City Indemnification. The City agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the
Contractor, its officers, directors, shareholders, partners, employees, and agents harmless
&om any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attorney
fees) to or by any and al( persons or entities, including without limitation, their respective
agents, licensees, or representatives, arising from, resulting from or connected with this
Agreement to the extent solely caused by the negligent acts, errors, or omissions of the City,
its employees or agents.
8.3 Survival. The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or
termination of this Agreement with respect to any event occurring prior to such expiration or
termination.
Equal Opportunit�mplo ��er.
In all Contractor services, programs or activities, and all Contractor hiring and employment
made possible by or resulting from this Agreement, there shall be no discrimination by Contractor or
by Contractor's employees, agents, subcontractors or representatives against any person because of
sex, age (except minimum age and retirement provisions), race, color, creed, national origin, marital
status or the presence of any disability, including sensory, mental or physical handicaps, unless based
Rev 12/08
upon a bona fide occupational qualification in relationship to hiring and employment. This
requirement shall apply, but not be limited to the following: employment, advertising, layoff or
termination, rates of pay or other forms of comperisation, and selection for training, including
apprenticeship. Contractor shall comply with and shall not violate any of the terms of Chapter 49.60
RCW, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans With Disabilities Act, Section 504 of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 49 CFR Part 21, 21.5 and 26, or any other applicable federal, state, or
local law or regulation regarding non-discrimination. Any material violation of this provision shall
be grounds for termination of this Agreement by the City and, in the case of the Contractor's breach,
may result in ineligibility for further City agreements.
10. Confidentialitv.
All information regarding the City obtained by Contractor in performance of this Agreement
shall be considered confidential. Breach of confidentiality by Contractor will be grounds for
immediate termination.
11. Insurance.
The Contractor agrees to carry as a minimum, the following insurance, in such forms and
with such carriers who have a rating that is satisfactory to the City:
11.1 Workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance in amounts
sufficient pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington;
11.2 Commercial general liability insurance with combined single limits of liability
not less than $2,000,000 for bodily injury, including personal injury or death, products
liability and property damage.
The City shall be named as additional insured on ail such insurance policies, with the
exception of workers' compensation coverage(s) if Contractor participates in a state-run workers'
comp program. Contractor shall provide certificates of insurance, concurrent with the execution of
this Agreement, evidencing such coverage and, at City's request, furnish the City with copies of all
insurance policies and with evidence of payment of premiums or fees of such policies. All insurance
policies shall contain a clause of endorsement providing that they may not be terminated or
materially amended during the Term of this Agreement, except after thirty (30) days prior written
notice to the City. If Contractor's insurance policies are "claims made," Contractor shall be required
to maintain tail coverage for a minimum period of three (3) years from the date this Agreement is
actually terminated or upon project completion and acceptance by the City_ Contractor's failure to
mairitain such insurance policies shali be grounds for the City's immediate termination of this
Agreement.
The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement
with respect to any event occurring prior to such expiration or termination.
Rev 12108
12. Work Product.
All originals and copies of work product, including plans, sketches, layouts, designs, design
specifications, records, files, computer disks, magnetic media or material which may be produced or
modified by Contractor while performing the Services shall belong to the City. At the termination or
cancellation of this Agreement, all originals and copies of any such work product remaining in the
possession of Contractor shall be delivered to the City.
13. Books and Records.
The Contractor agrees to maintain books, records, and documents which sufficiently and .
properly reflect all direct and indirect costs related to the performance of the Services and maintain
such accounting procedures and practices as may be deemed necessary by the City to assure proper
accounting of all funds paid pursuant to this Agreement. These records shall be subject, at all
reasonable times, to inspection, review or audit by the City, its authorized representative, the State
Auditor, or other governmental offtcials authorized by law to monitor this Agreement.
14. Non-Appropriation of Funds.
If sufficient funds are not appropriated or allocated for payment under this Agreement for any
future fiscal period, the City will not be obligated to make payments for Services or amounts
incurred after the end of the current fiscal period, and this Agreement will terminate upon the•
completion of all remaining Services for which funds are allocated. No penalty or expense shall
accrue to the City in the event this provision applies.
15. General Provisions
15.1 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the
Parties with respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this Agreement and no prior
agreements shall be effective for any purpose_
15.2 Modification. No provision of this Agreement, including this provision, may
be amended or modified except by written agreement signed by the Parties.
15.3 Fult Force and Effect. Any provision of this Agreement that is declared
invalid or itlegal shail in no way affect or invalidate any other provision hereof and such
other provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
15.4 Assi ent. Neither the Contractor nor the City shall have the right to
transfer or assign, in whole or in part, any or all of its obligations and rights hereunder
without the prior written consent of the other Party.
Rev 12/08
i5.5 Successors in Interest. Subject to the foregoing Subsection, the rights and
obligations of the Parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective
successors in interest, heirs and assigns. �
15.6 Attorney Fees. In the event either of the Parties defaults on the performance
of any terms of this Agreement or either Party places the enforc�ment of this Agreement in
the hands of an attorney, or files a lawsuit, each Party shall pay all its own attorneys' fees,
costs and expenses. The venue for any dispute related to this Agreement shall be King
County, Washington.
15.7 No Waiver. Failure or delay of the City to declare any breach or default
immediately upon occurrence shall not waive such breach or default. Failure of the Ciry to
declare one breach or default does not act as a waiver of the City's right to declare another
breach or default.
15.8 Governing I,aw. This Agreement shall be made in and shall be governed by
and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.
15.9 Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City
and Contractor represents and warrants that such individuals are duly authorized to execute
and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor or the City.
15.10 Notices. Any notices required to be given by the Parties shall be delivered at
the addresses set forth below. Any notices may be delivered personally to the addressee of
the notice or may be deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the address set
forth below. Any notice so posted in the United States mail shall be deemed received three
(3)�days after the date of mailing.
15.11 Captions. The respective captions of the Sections of this Agreement are
inserted for convenience of reference only and sha(1 not be deemed to modify or otherwise
affect any of the provisions of this Agreement.
L 5.12 Performance. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of its
provisions in which performance is a factor. Adherence to completion dates set forth in the
description of the Services is essential to the Contractor's performance of this Agreement.
15.13 Remedies Cumulative. Any remedies provided for under the terms of this
Agreement are not intended to be exclusive, but shall be cumulative with all other remedies
available to the City at law, in equity or by statute.
15.14 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, which counterparts shall collectively constitute the entire Agreement.
Rev 12/08
15.15 Compliance with Ethics Code. If a violation of the City's Ethics Resolution
No. 91-54, as amended, occurs as _a result of the formation and/or perfarmance of this
Agreement, this Agreement may be rendered null and void, at the City's option.
DATED the day and year set forth above.
CITY OF FEDERAI. WAY
By:
City Manager, Neal Beets
33325 8 th Ave S
P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
ATTEST:
d
City Clerk, Car 1 M eilty,
APPROVED A RM:
City Attorney, Patricia A Richardson
Rev 12/08
STRATEGIES 360
By:
Eric Sorenson, President
1505 Westlake Avenue N.
Suite 1000
Seattle, WA 98109
(206) 282-1990
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF � �
On this day personally appeared before me Eric Sorenson, to me known to be the President of
Strategies 360 that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be
the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,
and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if
any, is the corporate s�d�e'P�4fNY�¢q�rporation.
`�,.�`� J �S A.:.�lq�;'�.,�� ��� , 200
GNEN rr� ����i s�al this � day of 5
__- : � �,°�,,_ - �;,� - ,�
; �� QueL�� :�,�° ; �
� ,:�, �} - �
�' �'�' �'� .os,te ,�` (typed/printed na e of notary)
/ ���'�i,��F OF WA`'� ����`�� Notary Public in and for the St te of Washington.
�Iniin������
My commission expires S � J
Rev 12/08
EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES
CONTRACTOR will provide the City with comprehensive federal
representation and will work with City elected officials and
staff to develop and implement both a short-term and long range
federal relations strategy in support of City projects, policies
and programs that are influenced or supported by federal policies
and funding. Specifics include:
Key Federal Priorities
In consultation with the City Council and City Staff, develop and
implement a strategy to secure federal funding and policy support
for the following key federal priorities in 2009:
• Transportation Funding. Coordinate and advocate for funding
from the reauthorization of the Federal Transportation
Reauthorization Bill and through the yearly appropriations
process* for two major transportation projects:
o The Triangle: I-5 / SR 161 / SR 18 interchange
improvements
o City Center Access Project: New freeway interchange at
S. 320 and I-5
� Economic Stimulus Funding. Coordinate and advocate for
Economic Stimulus funding for Federal Way for a variety of
projects. The seven projects on the City's current list and
their requested amounts are (in no particular order):
o Triangle Project: I-5/SR 161 Ramps ($34M)
o S. 348th at lst Ave S. intersection improvements
($3.5M)
o Street light improvements: 17th Ave S. and 20th Way S.
to S. 324th Street and S. 330 ($180K)
o Easter Lake Flood Control Improvements ($728K)
o Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase IV ($3M)
o Parking garage, property demolition, grading and
clearing for Performing Arts Center ($5M)
o City Center Access Project Phase 3: Turn lanes for I-S
Southbound off-ramp ($2.65M)
• Federal Support for Select Programs_ Seek federal support
through policies, regulation or funding for issues of
concern to Federal Way including but not limited to: local
law enforcement and crime prevention (COPS, etc.), and human
services (CDBG, etc.).
• Grant Opportunities. Assist City Departments with
identifying grant opportunities in support of City
priorities, including but not limited to: the arts,
Rev 12/08
emergency management (particularly in the area of
communications), economic development, human services, open
space, law enforcement,. environmental and energy
conservation, and others.
Administration and Communication
In consultation with the City Manager's office, develop and
implement a strategy to keep the City of Federal Way and the
Washington Congressional Delegation in touch through 2009.
Pursuant to this, the CONTRACTOR shall:
• Coordinate at least one visit per year of City of Federal
Way officials to Washington, D.C. for lobbying purposes.
• Coordinate at least one visit per year by the CONTRACTOR to
the City of Federal Way to present at a mutually-agreed upon
City Council meeting.
• Design and implement an outreach plan to bring Members of
Congress and Congressional staff to Federal Way for further
discussion and education on the needs and opportunities for
federal support of the Federal Way's priorities.
• Provide updates, strategy development and coordination via
regular email communications, phone calls and conference
meetings with City staff, including phone conference
presentations at the Finance, Economic Development And
Regional Affairs City Council Committee when appropriate
(meets 4 th Tuesday of the month at 5:30 p.m.)
• Provide regular status reports (email is acceptable)
preferably every other week but at least monthly; and a
comprehensive written report at the end of each Session of
Congress summarizing accomplishments and recommending goals
and strategies to guide the City and the CONTRACTOR in the
next Session of Congress.
*FY 2010 appropriations forms for Sens. Murray and CantwelZ and Rep. Smith
will be compieted and delivered to their offices by City staff by the February
and early March 2009 deadlines. The CONTRACTOR will be responsible for follow
up once the contract period begins_
Rev 12/08
�''�'�`�'�='=.� . . ��iI��i�i i � . . . -._�l�l .
s��`�s
ACORD CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURAIVCE � Y '
TM.
PRODUCER Phone 206-284-0470 Fa< 206 28 7-7949 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUEO AS A MATTER OF IMPORMATION
ROY POTTER INSURANCE, INC. ONLY ANO CONFERS NO RICHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
412 QUEEN ANNE AVE. NORTH HOLUER. TMIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEPlD, EXTEND OR
SEATTLE WA 98109
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #
INSUREO INSURERA: ZURICH US
STRATEGIES 360, INC. INSURER B:
GO ERIC SORENSON
1505 WESTLAKE AVE N., STE 1000 �NSURER C:
SEATTLE WA 96109 INSURER D:
INSURER E:
COVERAGES
THE POUCtES OF ItJSURAtdCE IISTED BElO`P! H4VE BEE�d ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAFAED ABUVE FOR THE POLICf PERIOD INDIGITED, NOPPJITHSTA�d01NG
.MiY REOUiREMEnT. ?ERM OR CONDiTiqv OF ANV COr�TRqCT OR OTtiER DOCUnr�M v}9TH RESPECT TO WHICH TtiiS CERTiFiCaTE Pti4Y 8E iSSUEO OR
MAY PERrAW, iHE IPISURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POUCIES DESCP,IBED HEREIN iS SUBJEC7 TO ALL THE TERPAS, EXCLUSIONS AND COtJDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES. AGGRE�oAiE U�d1TS SHOWtJ MAY HAYE BEEN REWCEO 8Y PAIU CI.AIMS.
INSR App'L TypE Of INSURANCE pOLICY NUMBER �OLICY EFFECTIYE POIIGY E%PiRAT10N
L�R INSRO DAiE MM/DOlYY DA1E MNWO�YY UMITS
GENERAL LIABIItiY pAS001964883 10/12/08 10/1z/09 EHGH OCCURRENrC g 2,000,000
X COh1WEF2CIAL 6ENERHL LIABILITY OMtAGE TO P.ENTED $ 2
PP.Eh45E5 (Ea occurenca)
CLA�`Aa" PMDE O OCCUR . MEG. EXP (My one person) g � p
A PERSO�L4l & ADV ItJJUR'( $
i -
GENERAL AGGREGATE S 4,000,000
GEiv'L AGGREGATE LIb11T APPLIES PER � PROGUCTS�"'Gb1PIGP AGG. $ Q,�O,OOO
PRG- �
P�'-i�r �ECT LOC
I AUTOMOBLLE LIABIUTV COMBIPIEO �INGLE UMIT
ANY AUTU SEa acadent) 3
."vLL 0`NNtD AUT��S B�AILY �NJUR'f
SCHEDtA.ED AUTOS (Perperson) $
� HIRE6 AUTOS
BODILY INJURY $
NGnF-ObVfJED AUTOS (Per accidenq
PROPERTY DAMAC£ g
� (Peracp0er2)
GARAGE UABILI7V AUTO ON�Y - EA ArCIDENT $
I .Y�Y nUTO � OTHER TH4fJ Eia �,CC 3
AUTO ONLY �� $
� E%CESS 1 UMBREILA UABIIITY EA�H OCCURRENC[ $
I Ci,CUR � CLAIMS M,aGE AGGREG.4TE $
3
� � DcDUCi18lE g
RETEMIOfJ $ 3
I WORKERS COMPENSATION ANO wC STaTU- p7nER
� EMPIOYERS lIABU.fTY 70RY uelaTS
ANY iROPR1ETORRARTNERfEIfECUTNE E.l. EACH N�CIGEM $
OFFICE2MEM8EA E%CLUOEDT E L. OiSFi�SE-EA EPnPLO'�EE 3
1� YGS, EESGIb! YnC¢f
SPECIALVAOLISIONSOtIOw E.L DIJ'�SE-PrLIrYLI'Mlr $
orHER:
D SCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSlLOCA IONSNEHICLES/EXCL SIONS ADOED BY NDORSEMENT! SPECIAL PROVISIOPIS
The certificate hMder is added as addftional i�sured whe� requi�ed hy w�itten coM�act.
CFRTIFICdTF HAI f]FR reurci i nrrnu
City of Federal Way
PO Boz 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
SHOULD AT1Y OF 7HE A804E DESCRIBED POUCIES Be CAl`10ELLED BEFOR.E Th�
EXP�Rni�ON OniE TxEREOF. iHE �SSUtn1G �nI�uRER YJ�IL ErdDFP.vOR TO nM�L 70 DAYS
WRITiEN NOTICE TO THE CtRTIFIr'✓t,TE HOLDER �JM.tEG TO THE LEFT. 3UT FAI�UR£ i0
DO SG SHFLL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR UABILITI' OF ANY KIP.� UPON TF1E INSURER, IT'S
AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES.
. _,..._....�,..." ..�.,�........�
Attentlon_ Natalie,C(ty ManagePs Oftice. fau253-835-2409 ��C��
ACORO 25 (2001/08) Certificate # 10412 O ACORD CORPORATlON 1988
License Detail
License Information:
Entity Name:
FiRn Name:
License Type:
Entity Type:
UBI:
Status
Location Address:
STRATEGIES 360, INC.
STRATEGIES 360, INC.
Washington State Business
Profit Corporation
600530365 Business ID_001 Location ID:0001
To check the status of this company, go to Secretary of State..
Mailing Address:
1505 WEST�AKE AVE N STE
1000
SEATT�E, WA, 98109-6211
1505 WESTLAKE AVE N STE
1000
SEATTLE, WA, 98109
Governinq People:
ERIC SORENSON
RON (RONALD) DOTZAUER
Registered T�ade Names:
DMA, DON MCDONOUGH ASSOCIATES
S360
STRATEGIES 360
New Search
Page 1 �:�f 1 .
This site is limited to searching for business and professionat licenses issued by the Department of
Licensing or through the Master License Service. You may wish to click on OTHER LICENSES to
check for information on licenses issued by other agencies.
Department of Licensing Home Privacy Policv Other Licenses Contact Us
Use of lists of individuals provided on this site for commercial purposes is prohibited under Chapter
42.56 of the Revised Code of Washington.
Information Current as of 03/23f2009 4:31AM Pacific Time
https://fortress.wa.gov/dol/dolprodlbpdLicenseQuery/1qsLicenseDetail.aspx?SessID=671 &... 3I23/2009
License Detail He� us improve this online seroice
�������� � �:
PROVIDING STRATEGIC, COMPREHENSIVE REPRESENTATION
TO THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
trategies 360 is uniquely positioned to provide the City of Fede�al Way with unparalleled federal government
relations services. Our unique approach of inerging worid-class teams in Washington, OC and Washington
State provides our client partners with access to the federal government and the Washington State
Congressional delegation, as well as ongoing access and communication with our Seattle-based staff to
keep you informed of p�ogress. We are a Washington state firm with a history of seNing both public and private
sector clients with a deep understanding of both the needs and operating environment the City faces.
Strategies 360 brings extensive experience wo�king with Cong�ess and federal agencies to get results for our
clients. Successful government relations involves much more than marching into a DC office and making your
wishes known. We develop and execute integrated and comprehensive strategies tailored to the unique needs
and demands of each case and each client. We offer clients a full range of complementary services — lobbying,
public policy, public affairs, strategic business development and marketing services.
We are a boutique govemment relations company with an elite clientele, offering our client-partners a refreshingly
original public policy perspective. While some larger firms take pride in stacking clients like chord wood, we've
earned our repu#ation for superior seNice through regular communication with, and constant attention to, each of
our clients and their specific needs.
With more than 100 years of combined experience working in and wifh Congress and federal agencies, our team
can call upon relafionships built on a solid, longstanding foundation of trust and honest interaction.
Strategies 360 has the "two Washingtons" well-coveretl, with an experienced,
robust, deeply-connected federal relations team of Tylynn Gortlon and Dean
Meinen in Washington, DC, and Ron Dotzauer, Eric Sorenson and Matt
Steuerwalt in Seattle.
POLICY SUPPORT
e believe that efifective representation is a daily task, and that
achieving policy outcomes is the best measu�e of success. The
City of Federal Way has identified a need for funding and policy
suppo�t for key city priorities such as transportation, economic
stimulus, and community development. Our efforts would focus on
building suppo�t for the specific requests the City has identified by leveraging
our existing long-term relationships with the Washington State Congressional
delegation, Congressional committee staff, the Obama administration, and
career program staff in Washington DC. The Congressional stimulus
conversation is likely to be finished by the time #he City awards this contract;
• Strategies 360 • 3300 M Street, NW • Suite 200 • Washington, DC 20007 • 202.333.2234 •
.rtl
our unique ability to also work with state policy-makers may be a decisive factor in achieving your goals. Our
practice spans three other Northwestern states and a diverse client list, enabling us to identify and forge strategic
alliances in support of the City's policy goals. _
The members of the S360 team have worked with every Congressional office in the region and numerous Federal
agencies. We are extremely familiar with the legislative regulatory rule-making processes and understand how
these processes are intertwined. We recognize the need to take both a"bottoms-up" and a"top-down" approach to
Federal tlecision-making. While it is often important to contact and communicate with leadership, it is also
important to engage career personnel so that everyone in the decision-making chain of the federal government is
aware of and understands the City's needs.
Finally, we believe our clients are the most compelling messengers. Working to identify the very best opportuni#ies
to have the City speak directly with Federal policy-makers in Washington DC and in Federal Way, S360 will provide
preparation and support to ensure these meetings successful.
CLIENT COMMUNICATION
Strategies 360 is deeply committed to frequent and interactive communications with our clients. Accessible via
phone and email, the S360 team maintains constant communication with our clients. Additionally, we provide
monthly client memos detailing the work undertaken and progress achieved. Regular communication ensures that
the City and the S360 team are coordinating e�fo�ts and are up-to-date on the relevant issues. We encourage ou�
clients to contact us at any time and without reseNation. Our presence in both Washington, DC and Washington
State guarantees someone is always available to assist our clients.
In addition, we seek to work cooperatively with any other consultants the City of Federal Way may have to ensure
consistent representation of the City by various parties including, but not fimited to, state and local representation,
representatives to associations and o�ganizations, and attorneys.
PROPOSED OUTLINE OF TASKS
� Draft strategic plan and timeline within 15 days of awarding of contract
� Work with delegation on 2009 Federal Appropriations request
e Strategies 360 will conduct thorough research, identifying federal p�ograms and grants that will meet the
funding needs of the City of Federal Ways' priority projects
� Draft a talking points memo of the positive impact and advantages of funding the City's proposed projects
• Plan annual visits for City of Federal Way to Washington, DC, including meetings with Washington State
Congressional Delegation and various federal agencies
9 Plan annual trips to the City of Federal Way for S360 team members to present plans and accomplishments on
securing funding for the City's projects
� Develop and implement strategy to secure federal funding on City's priorities through appropriations, grants and
discretionary agency funding
i Engage in regular communication with the City through e-mail, confe�ence calls, daiiy legislative updates and
monthly memos detailing S360's prog�ess on the City's priorities and next steps
• Strategies 360 � 3300 M Street, NW • Suite 200 • Washington, DC 20007 • 202.333.2234 •
s
��
STRATEGIES 360: WHO WE ARE
Strategies 360 believes that the key to a successful government relations campaign is to integrate effo�ts in
Washington, DC and Washington state — to support talented federal lobbyists with powerful in-state resources. We
field a team that embodies this belief and will help Federal Way achieve success.
The combined experiences of the S360 team provide unparalleled access to the Washington state congressional
delegation as well as congressional decision-makers outside Washington State and the Pacific No�thwest.
f; �,� �r, �� ��f �,�.
WASHINGTON, DC TEAM
o TYLYNN GORDON, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
Tyiynn serves S360 as senior vice president of federal relations. With experience in strategic consulting,
government sen+ice, and political campaigns, Tylynn provides superior service to S360 clients. She has ties to
current Democratic leadership, including Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus, for whom she served as the
former state finance director #or fundraising operation. Her government service inciudes time as the deputy
state auditor for the state of Montana whe�e she developed legislative strategy and guided passage of 21
pieces of key legislation. Tylynn also founded an independent consulting firm that handled strategic planning,
recruiting and grassroots lobbying efforts at the national level. There, she created grassroots strategies for
organizations seeki�g fetleral legislation on rural broadband access antl helped the Competitive l.ong Distance
Coalition gain approval for their #ederal telecommunications initiative. She served on #he campaigns of Senator
Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Governor Kathleen Sebelius (D-KS) and maintains close ties with Senator Tim
Johnson (D-SD) and Senator Jon Tester (D-MT). Tylynn's mastery of grassroots politics and her network of
fetleral government contacts enable her to lend cnacial insight to S360's clients.
DEAN MEINEN, VICE PRESIDENT
Dean Meinen has 15 years of political and public policy experience. In addition to working in the U.S. House o#
Representatives, he worked in the United States Senate for eight years. As Senator Tim Johnson's Economic
Development Director, he was instrumental in assisting businesses, universities, municipal leaders and Native
American Tribes to achieve critical goals. Dean has extensive experience working through the legislative and
appropriations process, as well as collaborating with Federal Agencies and Departments. Before wo�king in
Congress, Dean worked for grassroots organizations and political campaigns. His political experience includes
successful campaign ma�agement, fundraising, organizing, and persuasion outreach.
� LAUREN PICKERIN� UNSWORTH, FEDERAL RELATIONS ASSOCIATE
A senior Political Science student at The George Washington University in Washington, DC- Lauren b�ings a
lifetime of experience in western state and federal politics to the S360 team. Lauren worked as a Finance
Assistant for Senator Max Baucus' (D-MT) 2008 campaign committee before coming to work for S360. After
one year of college, Lauren took 6me off school to serve as the Political Director of the Montana Democratic
Pa�ty during the 2006 campaign cycle to elect Jon Tester (D-MT) to the US Senate. As the Montana State
Chair of Freedom's Answer, Lauren helped lead a national youth voter turnout movement while a senio� in high
schooL
• Strategies 360 • 3300 M Street, NW • Suite 200 • Washington, DC 20007 • 202.333.2234 •
,.tt
WASHINGTON STATE TEAM
• RON OOTZAUER, S360 CO-FOUNDER 8� CEO
Ron shapes and informs the public policy sector of Strategies 360 with his expertise in political strategy, keen
instincts and vast netwo�k of contacts. He is widely recognized as one of the region's premier public affairs
strategists. Ron began his political career in Clark Counfy, serving as Cla�k County Auditor from 1974 to 1982.
He has served both in public office and as a behind-the-scenes director for numerous successful Washington
state Democratic campaigns including: Senator Henry M. Jackson, Governor Booth Gardner, and most
recently, Senator Maria Cantwell.
� ERIC SORENSON, S360 CO-FOUNDER 8� PRESIDENT
Eric brings his conside�able knowledge and application of business practices to the business and marketing
sectors of Strategies 360. He is regarded as one of the country's leading experts in marketing and helped to
pioneer sorne of the most significant developments in retail and sales marketing over the last two tlecades.
The foundation for E�ic's business background was laid during the eight years he spent as a marketing
professor at the Kellogg School at Northwestern Unive�sity. Eric has worked with a wide range of organizations
worldwide to help improve their ma�keting practices and capabilities. His client list includes: Black & Decke�,
Bristo) Myers Squibb, Cir�us, CVS, Coca Cola, Colgate Palmolive, Hallmark, Ito Yokado (Japan), Kodak, Kraft,
Meiji (Japan), Microsoft, Quaker Oats, Redley (Brazil), S.C. Johnson, and Target Stores.
� MATT STEUERWALT, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
Matt recently joined S360 after four years seNing as an advisor to Governor Gregoires on energy, climate
change, telecommunications and financial institutions issues. He previously served her in a similar role for
eight years in the state O�ce of the Attorney General. Matt has forged excellent relationships with local, state
and federal officials and is equally effective with elected officials and agency staff thanks to his ability to
understand complicated technical material and translate it for decision-makers. He brings over 18 years
working in public policy to bear on behalf of the firm's clients.
Although you will have access to the.full range of S360's resources, Ms. Go�don wiB be your primary representative
in Washington DC. Mr. Steuennialt will be your primary representative in Washington State. Mr. Sorenson will be
responsible for administering the cont�act.
• Strafegies 360 • 3300 M Street, NW • Suite 200 • Washington, DC 20007 • 202.3332234 •
�
STRATEGIES 360 SUCCESS STORIES
MEETING CHALLENGES. DELIVERING RESULTS.
Ou� strategy all begins with a unique, in-depth understanding of o�r client's needs and ends with the leveraging of
our relationships to achieve results. That's the Strategies 360 difference: we are not a lobbying factory, with a client
list as long as Pennsylvania Avenue. Instead, we are a boutique public affairs firm, with deep roots in Washington
State and cultivated relationships with key decision-makers in Washington, DC.
At Strategies 360, we don't merely hear our clients-- we actuaQy listen. To us, its not just a matter of understanding
our clienYs wishes but instead, adopting their challenges as our own. We don't just point out opportunities and
solutions: we act on them.
Here are just a few examples of Strategies 360's successes with Washington State Communities in the 2007
federal legislative session:
• Po�t of Tacoma Interchange Improvement —$980,000
The Port of Tacoma Interchange Improvement project will provide road and interchange improvements at the
intersection of Interstate 5, Pacific Highway East, and Port of Tacoma Ro.ad.
+ No�thwest Maritime Center — $441,000
This funding will suppo�t the efforts of the city of Po�t Townsend and the Northwest Ma�itime Center to redevelop
the former Thomas Oil Brownfield site. This initiative is aimed at revitalizing Port Townsend's National Landmark
Historic District and creating new eco�omic, tourist, educational, and recreational oppo�tunities.
� Mud MoWntain Dam Construction — $2,340,000
These funds will be used to replace the 100-year old diversion dam on the White River, and will enable the Corps to
meet ongoing fish passage needs. The money will also be used for operations of the current facility.
• City of Fife, Washington — $3,Z20,000
These funds will be used for the 70� Avenue East widening and Valley Avenue East/SR 167 alternative.
3 City of SeaTac, Washington -$1,000,000
These funds will be used for imp�ovements for South 154th Street in SeaTac; including sidewalks, bike lanes, curbs,
gutters, and illumination.
2009 PROJECTS
City of SeaTac, Washington — Main St�eet SeaTac project
Steven's Hospital; Edmonds, Washington — Emergency Department funding project
Po�t Hadlock; Jefferson County Washington — Waste Water System
City of Spokane, Washington — Transportation appropriations projects
• Strategies 360 • 3300 M St�eet, NW • Suite 200 • Washington, DC 20007 • 202.333.2234 •
� --- ------ —
A COMPETITIVE RATE AND FEE SCHEDULE
Should Federal Way wish to pu�sue federal relations with Strategies 360, we propose a fair and competitive fee per
month to cover all professional seroices rather than an hourly fee fo� service. Out-of-pocket costs, including long
distance charges, copying charges, postage or other delivery cbarges, reasonable travel costs, and necessary
ente�tainment, shall be itemized and presented to Fede�al Way for reimbursement on a monthly basis. Atl expenses
over $200 will be submitted for pre-approval.
Strategies 360 is highly sensitive to the need for confidentiality. All information that may be acquired in connection
with or as a result of work performed on behalf of Federal Way, would be kept in strictest confidence. Strategies
360 would not disclose any information designated by the City of Federal Way as proprietary or confidential.
Strategies 360 warrants that there is no conflict of interest arising from its other contracts or other employment and
the activities that would be performed on behalf of Federal Way. Strategies 360 would advise Federal Way if any
such conflict arose.
PROPOSED FEES
Strategies 360 proposes a monthly retaine� fee range of $5,000 per month for federal representation. All of
Strategies 360's federal legislative and client seNices are included within this fee. Because of Strategies 360's
business model, Federal Way will benefit substantially from the full-seNice S360 teams on the ground in
Washington DC, and in Washington State.
We are excited about the prospect of working with the City of Federal Way, and confident that we will deliver
significant value to the company. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions.
• Strategies 360 • 3300 M Street, NW • Suite 200 • Washington, DC 20007 • 202.333.2234 •
�
�
PARTIAL CLIENT LIST
• City of Marysville, Washington
• REC Silicon
� Chelan PUD
• Grant County PUD
• Ciippe� Seafood
• Puget Sound Energy
• Sound Built
o Tulalip Tribes
• Voith Siemens Hyd�o Power Generation
+ US Ecology, Inc.
, Clover Park School District
� Apple Computers
• City of Mukilteo, Washington
• Washington State Depa�tment of Transportation
� Waste Connections
� Potelco
• Stevens Hospital
• Evergreen Hospital
� Tetra Tech
� City of Spokane, Washington
• Strategies 360 • 3300 M Street, NW • Suite 200 • Washington, DC 20007 � 202.333.2234 •
�
CLIENT REFERENCES
MARK QUEHRN
Managing Partner – Perkins Coie
One Bellevue Center
411 -108th Avenue NE, Suite 1800
Bellevue, WA 98004
[425] 453-7307
mquehrn@perkinscoie.com
TIM CULBERTSON
General Manager – Grant County Pubiic Utility
30 C Street SW
Ephrata, WA 98823
[509] 793-9400
DAVID DYE
Chief Operating Officer/Deputy Secretary –
Washington 5tate Department of Transpo�tation
PO Box 47300
Olympia, Washington 98504
[360] 705-7000
ED SCHILD
Director Energy Production & Storage –
Puget Sound Energy
PO Box 97034
PSE-09 South
Bellevue, WA 98009
[425] 462-3022
edward.schild@pse.com
DAVID ROBISON
Executive Director—No�thwest Maritime Center
380 Jefferson Street
Port Townsend, WA 98368
[360] 379-2629
JEFF BJORNSTAD
Chief of Staff – Senator Patty MuRay
173 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
(202] 224-2621
GEORGE BEHAN
Chief of Staff – Rep�esentative Norm Dicks
2467 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
j202] 225-5916
JACK KIRKMAN
Vice President & Chief Development Officer –
Stevens Hospital
21601 76m Avenue, West
Edmonds, WA 988026
[425j 640-4009
jkirkman@stevenshospital.org
__ _ _ _
• Strategies 360 � 3300 M Street, NW • Suite 200 • Washington, DC 20007 • 202.333.2234 •
' !
Caroi McNeilly
From: Natalie Rees
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 9:44 AM
To: Carol McNeilly
Subject: Account Numbers
Here are the 3 account numbers that need to be listed on the Strategies 360 contract:
001-0000-020-397-10-005 ��`��
001-1100-021-513-10-410 � �
306-4400-000-597-44-552 ��
Natalie
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 5, 2010
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: CONTRACT EXTENSION FOR STATE LOBBYIST
POLICY QUESTION Should the City of Federal Way extend the state lobbying contract with Outcomes by
Levy for the current budgeted amount of $57,829 per year?
ITEM #:��
COMMITTEE Finance, Economic Development, Regional Affairs
CATEGORY:
� Consent
❑ City Council Business
�
'�'
Ordinance
Resolution
MEETING DATE: Sept. 28, 2010
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY: Linda Farmer Government Affairs Mana�er __ DEPT: City Manager
_ ........................................................._..._...._..........._.._................._................................................_....z.................................................................._...................._......._..............._..._..... __..._..._....................._......_...._._...__....................__..._�...._........................_...._.._..._..._...._......_____...._.
Overview
The City of Federal Way has retained the services of Doug Levy (Outcomes by Levy), for lobbying assistance at
the State Legislative level since January 2001. The original contract was extended five times and then was re-bid.
Outcomes by Levy was the successful bidder and the City entered into a new contract in 2003. That contract was
extended four times and then was rebid in 2009. Outcomes by Levy was again the successful bidder.
Per Council Member Mike Park's request--and as approved at the September 27, 2009, City Council meeting--
the City entered into a 9-month contract with Outcomes by Levy with the purpose of considering a two-year
contract extension during the City's biennial budget process for 2011-2012.
Proposed Cost
Staff recommends the cost of the contract extension not exceed the current budgeted amount of $57,829 per year,
for a total biennial amount of $115,658.
Scope of work
Staff recommends that the general scope of work from the 2009 contract remain the same. Each year the City
Council adopts a new Legislative Agenda that outlines the specific items to be worked on for the upcoming
Legislative Session.
Highlights from the current contract with Outcomes by Levy
With the assistance of Outcomes by Levy, the City has been successful at the state and regional legislative levels.
Outcomes by Levy provided the attached 3-page report of accomplishments between 2001- 2010. Highlights
include:
Capital fundin�:
• $103M for Triangle Interchange
• $S.SM for the PACC
• $2.1M for Camp Kilworth
•$1.3M Regional Mobility funds for Pacific
•$1.OM+ in Urban Vitality grants for S. 348'�'
Economic Development:
• Helped enact LIFT and LRF legislation and secure funding under both.
• Helped garner nearly $100K for Han Woo-Ri.
Law Enforcement/Courts
• Helped enact auto theft prevention legislation and secure funding.
• Lead the enactment of stiffer penalties for look-alike gun legislation.
Assistance with Regional Issues/Initiatives:
• Spearheaded the effort to extend light rail to S. 272 as part of ST-2.
Attachments:
• Accomplishments Report (2001-2010) provided by Outcomes by Levy
• Proposed contract amendment documents
� Current 9-month contract document (January to September 2010)
Options Considered:
1) Authorize a two-year contract extension for Outcomes by Levy not to exceed the budgeted amount.
2) Authorize a one-year contract extension for Outcomes by Levy not to exceed the budgeted amount.
3) Reject the contract extension and provide staff with alternate direction.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Council Member Mike Park recommends approval of Option 1.
�' o �
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: �u"" �� D�� � DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
Committee Council �0 2 tte' n Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION I move to forward the proposed Amendment to the October S 2010, consent
agenda for approval.
2010, through September 30, 2012, with a total compensation of $115,658, and authorize the City Manager to
sign said agreement. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) _
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1 reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED — 08/12/2010 RESOLiJ1'ION #
I
City of Federal Way Contract for State Lobbying Assistance I
HIGHLIGHTS 2001-2010 '
Doug Levy/Outcomes By Levy ,
OVERVIEW
Outcomes by Levy is proud to have represented the City of Federal Way at the State and Regional levels
for nearly 10 years (contract began January 2001). Outcomes by Levy has provided year-round support
that equates to 80 hours of work each month (both for Federal Way specifically and in the form of
information, meetings, contacts on behalf of FW and all cities).
A sample of my work and my commitment to Federal Way includes the following work performed under
the direction of the City Manager:
• State. Intensive work with State legislators, legislative staff, committee staff, state agency heads
and agency staff.
• Regional. Maintain ongoing relationships and contacts with Governor's office, AWC, SCA, PIC,
and many other agencies.
• City. Work with elected officials, department heads and senior staff on legislative, regulatory,
and funding issues of concern to the City.
HIGHLIGHTS
Capital and Transportation Funding
Seeking out infrastructure and project funding in the state's Capital and Operating budgets is always a
team effort. That said, I have plaqed an integral role in helping the City develop, position, package and
advocate its requests over the years and the City now has a system in place to bring Capital and
Transportation requests forward.
What has Federal Way received over the years?
• $103 million for Triangle Interchange ($100m in 2005 — one of largest single appropriations
outside of Viaduct and 405; and $3m in 2003). Also, over $65 million for SR-509.
• $5.825 million for the PACC ($500,000 in Z008 — we were the only project among those seeking
"Public Facility District" (PFD) financing to receive any funding; $S million in 2009-11 Capital
Budget funding and preserved "Building for the Arts" funding level to ensure $325,000 BFA
grant)
• $2.1 million for Camp Kilworth — 2007-09
• $1.3 million "Regional Mobility" funds for Pacific Highway — 2009-11 Transportation budget —
was not funded in initial House budgets
• "Urban Vitality" funding — 2009-11 Capital Budget -$9.531 million competitive funding
statewide — FW landed $1m+ for 348` project!
• $856,000 for 1oe's Creek — 2005-07 Capital Budget
• 2010 Session storm water funding — several hundred thousand $$ for FW (direct allocation +
opportunity to compete for grant funding)
• $350,000 for Hylebos Park boardwalk (2003-OS and 2005-07 budgets)
• $140,000 for sea lettuce removal at Dumas Bay
• $106,000 for Historica) Cabins project (2003 Session)
Economic Development Opportunities
• I was one of the lead lobbyists on both 2006 "LIFT" legislation (Local Infrastructure Financing
Tool) and 2008 "Local Revitalization Financing" (LRFj.
• Federal Way has received BOTH a LIFT grant and an LRF grant— one of only a few cities in the
state pledged for funding under both programs.
• I was one of the lead lobbyists in 2008 on hotel-motel tax legislation that codified the authority
for Federal Way and other cities to allocate H/M tax toward "special events" (key to us being
able to use these $$ towards Aquatics Center; for Han Woo Ri, etc.)
• Worked on successful appropriations for the Han Woo Ri festival — nearly $100,000 overall
• Helped with $100,000 medical device incubator funding in 2010 Operating Budget — particularly
in'holding' the project in the final budget after Senator Eide got it in the Senate version
Law Enforcement/Courts
• One of the lead lobbyists for 2007 auto theft legislation that stiffened auto theft penalties and
created the "Washington Auto Theft Prevention Authority" which granted $$ to regional auto
theft prevention task forces.
• Federal Way has received significant $$ for auto theft prevention and has driven auto theft rates
down over 70 percent
• Lobbied successful enactment of �009 legislatio� (SSB 5413) stiffening sentences for those who
threaten police officers with look-alike guns
• Lobbied successful enactment of SB 5953 in 2007 Session — stiffens penalties for DV cases that
involve attempted strangulation.
• Lobbied successfui'enactment of SSB 6384 in 2005 Session, a new fee authority for courts to
assess/use against DV perpetrators
• One of lead lobbyists for 2002 legislation that ensured Federal Way and other King County cities
could contract for jail services outside King County.
• Helped with successful lobbying for over $4 million in additional Basic Law Enforcement
Academy (BLEA) training funds for police — 2006 Supplemental and 2007-09 Ope�ating Budgets.
Overall Flexibility
• Federal Way received "design-build/GC-CM" alternative contracting authority in the 2001
Session;
Federal Way and other King Cou�ty cities are the ONLY cities in the state (outside of those with
'grandfathered' city-run transit agencies — Everett; Yakima; Pullman) that have authority to
contract with private or non-profit providers for intra-city transit service needs (SHB 2179 —
2010 Session)
Federal Way and other cities have authority to form T�ansportation Benefit Districts (helped
with this bil) — ESHB 1858 — 2007 Session).
Assistance with regionat issues, initiatives
ST-2: Initial proposals involving Sound Transit Phase 11 in 2008 would have extended Light Rail
Transit only from the SeaTac Airport to 200` Street. I helped spearhead an effort among city
officials and Council Members to push for more. We met with numerous ST Board Members,
had several meetings with ST senior staff and technical staff — and ended up with LRT extending
to the northern gateway of Federal Way (272" as part of ST-2.
Transportation and Fiscal ballot measures and initiatives: Over the last 10 years, whether it
has been Referendum 51, the 9%-cent gas tax preservation, the RTID "Roads and Transit"
measure in 2007 (would have fully funded the Triangle), or a series of Initiatives impacting the
City's genera) fund, I have been significantly involved "off the clock" and have assisted the City
with information, positioning, development of Council Resolutions, etc.
Fiscal
• Federal Way received nearly $1 million in post-Initiative 695 "backfill" monies — z001
• With ESSB 6686 in 2006, for the first time ever, the State Legislature authorized financing
assistance (state sales tax credit monies) to he�p cities move forward with large annexations
(10,000 population or more}.
• Given the unsuccessful election outcome in Federal Way, we also worked on 2009 legislation
that extends the annexation "commencement" date until 2015.
• f was.one of the lobbyist that worked on ESHB 3179 provisions in 2010 to preserve and codify
the Brokered Natural Gas (BNG) tax -$50,000/year source of funds for Federal Way
• I was one of the lead lobbyists for 2007 "Streamlined Sales Tax" (SST) legislation — a top priority
for Federal Way (SSB 5089).
• Lobbied successful allocation of $150,000 in buildable lands funding for King County suburban
cities — 2006 Supplemental Operating budget.
Heading off Damaging Bills
In the nearly 10 years I have been lobbying for Federal Way, I am not aware of a single bill that led to
sig�ificant fiscal implications or other `harm' to the City of Federal Way.
Some of the things we have headed off over the years:
• Undoing water-sewer district assumption authority (defeated numerous times)
• 2001 Lakewood Theme Park special tax package, tax incentives (defeated)
• Red-light camera authority compromised, limited (defeated, 2010 Session)
• 2007 attempt to require that all multi-family housing property tax exemption projects meet an
"affordability" criteria (headed off and revised — E25H6 1910).
���'� �s�
� .�
G:T'� �#wLL
:i;:���.'_i $£'�t ?�°i�r�i:2 5r•£tf�t � I':s ��x 9'r''(b
��l�'c�!'a5��f `d*�t� �xf3:;?-:373f;
t2M�s; o^'�:��7�;t�
;z'�; .v.c't{y'n;;s�r,t�}e3:ss�r�y. r.�i1?
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR
LEGISLATIVE LOBBYING SERVICE5
This Amendment ("Amendment No. 1") is made between the City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal
corporation ("City"), and Douglas R. Levy, DBA as Outcomes by Levy, a sole proprietor ("Contractor"). The City
and Contractor (together "Parties"), for valuable consideration and by mutual consent of the parties, agree to amend
the original Agreement for Legislative Lobbying Sei ("Agreement") dated effective January 7, 2010:
1. AMENDED TERM. The term of the Agreement, as referenced by Section 1 ofthe Agreement and any prior
amendments thereto, shall be amended and shall continue until the completion of the Services, but in any event no
later than September 30, 2012 ("Amended Term").
2. AMENDED COMPENSATION. The amount of compensation, as referenced by Section 4 of the
Agreement, sha11 be amended to change the total compensation the City shall pay the Contractor and the rate or
method of payment, as delineated in Exhibit "B-1", attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. The
Contractor agrees that any hourly or flat rate charged by it for its services contracted for herein shall remain locked at
the negotiated rate(s) for the Amended Term. Except as otherwise provided in an attached Exhibit, the Contractor
shall be solely responsible for the payment of any taxes imposed by any lawful jurisdiction as a result of the
performance and payment of this Agreement.
3. GENERAL PROVISIONS. All other terms and provisions of the Agreement, together with any prior
amendments thereto, not modified by this Amendment, sha11 remain in full force and effect. Any and all acts done by
either Party consistent with the authority of the Agreement, together with any prior amendments thereto, after the
previous e�iration date and prior to the effective date of this Amendment, is hereby ratified as having been
performed under the Agreement, as modified by any prior amendments, as it existed prior to this Amendment. The
provisions of Section 13 of the Agreement sha11 apply to and govern this Amendment. The parties whose names
appear below swear under penalty of perjury that they are authorized to enter into this Amendment, which is binding
on the parties of this contract.
[Signature page follows]
AMENDMENT 1/2010
�ET'� �3$'
� �
C:T`i E-�:tLL
:i:���.`_i 8Y„r� ?sy���8 5rE1tYt < �'i:e &�Y,. 3i �o
��.4^��'2�! l+lf�x, k;+t; ��5£3�:?-�' 3£;
(2w�s; E'��7�xt�
:Z3Y3Y_ C lyYb�iW�t�£t3k i2i)/.� C,^.i e?
IN WITNESS, the Parties execute this Agreement below, effective the last date written below.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
By:
Brian Wilson, City Manager/Police Chief
DATE:
OUTCOMES BY LEVY
By:
Printed Name:
Title:
DATE:
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF 1
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Carol McNeilly, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney, Patricia A Richardson
On this day personally appeared before me, , to me known to be the
individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and on oath swore that he executed the foregoing
instrument as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN my hand and official seal this day of
20
(typed/printed name of notary)
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington.
My commission expires
ANIENDMLNT 1 /2010
�!3"�' �'s� GE`�"'i t�i:�L�.
� . � 3:��?�`i c3Yrs ??�ie�t�� 5c_:ES�'t < �'::� �Y: 3> �o
����'29!';�f�',� `F`�a'3; ,nrzit3:ti;-3i 3fi
f 2�:s; �'��-7��t�
:Z4;'':Nf: y'fA�iPf�?etff :titi?I1:�OiJ?
EXHIBIT B-1
ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION
1. Tota1 Compensation: In return for the Services, the City shall pay the Contractor an additional amount not to
exceed One Hundred Fifteen Thousand Six Hundred Fifty-Eight and No/100 Dollars ($115,658.00). The total
amount payable to Contractor pursuant to the original Agreement and this Amendment shall be an amount not to
exceed One Hundred Fifty-nine Thousand Thirty and No/100 Dollars ($159,030.00).
AMENDMLNT 1/2010
` CITY OF
Federal Way
Page 1 / 1
33325 8th Ave. South
P:O. Box 9718 DATE PO NtJMB�R
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 1/ 11 / 2 0 l 0 0 614 6 5
VENDOR: 005741 SHIP TO: FEDERAL WAY CITY HALL
OUTCOMES BY LEVY 33325 8TH AVE SOUTH
DOUGLAS R LEVY PO BOX 9718
15619 62ND PL NE FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718
KENMORE, WA 98028
FOB Point: Req. No.:
Terms: Net 30 Dept.:
Req. Del. Date: Contact: NATALIE REES
Confirming? Yes
Special inst: CM-AG10-001 LEGISLATIVE LOBBY SVC
CM-AG10-001 LEGISLATIVE LOBBY SVC
1/1/2010 - 9/31/2010
BILLTO: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
33325 8TH AVE SOUTH
PO BOX 9718
FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718
�
SUBTOTAL
TAX
FREIGHT
TOTAL
43,372.00
43,372.00
0.00
0.00
4
Account Number Amount Account Number Amount
E 001-1100-021-513-10-410 43,372.00
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature (over $1,000)
-� RETURN TO: �/ � I , r��
VJ L�
���
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY LAW DEPARTMENT
REQUEST FOR CONTRACT PREPAItATION/DOCUMENT REVIEW/SIGNATURE ROUTING SLIP
1. ORIGINATING DEPTJDIV: (:."' \
2. ORIGINATING STAFF PERSON: �I F�Tf� � �C L'� EXT: a�{ 6�2 3. DATE REQ. BY: (2 2q �
4. TYPE OF DOCUMENT REQUESTED (CHECK ONE)
o CONTRACTOR SELECTION DOCUMENT (E.G., RFB, RFP, RFQ)
❑ PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT � SMALL PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
`�PROFESSIONALSERVICEAGREEMENT ❑ MAINTENANCEAGREEMENT
❑ GOODS AND SERVICE AGREEMENT
❑ REAL ESTATE DOCUMENT
❑ ORDINANCE
❑ CONTRACTAMENDMENT(AG#):
❑ OTHER
5. PROJECT' NAME:
6. NAME OF CON'
ADDRESS:
SIGNATUR
�eL �
7. EXHIBITS AND ATTACHMENTS: ❑ SCOYE, WORK OR SERVICES ❑ COMPENSATION O INSURANCE REQUIRENfENTS/CL:RTIFICATE. ❑ ALL
OTHER REFERENCED F.?�IIBITS ❑ PROOF OF AL'THORITY TO SIGN ❑ REQUIRED LICENSES ❑ PRIOR CONTRACT/AMENI)MENTS
8. TERM: COMMENCEMENT DATE: / � ( � � ! O COMPLETION DATE: � �� / � � O ! O
9. TOTAL COMPENSATION $ �� � 3� p2 ♦ Q�,} �WCLUDE EXPENSES AND SALES TAX, IF ANY�
(IF CH.I.CtILATED ON HOURLY LABOR HARUE - ATTACH SCHEDULES OF EMPLOYEES TITLES AND HOLIDAY RATES)
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSE;�Y�.s ❑ rro tF Y Es, M.a�MU�s DoLL� aN1oul.iT: $
IS SALF,S TAX OWED ❑YES �O IF YES, � YAlll BY: ❑ CONT1tACTOR � CITY
❑ PURCHASING: PLEASE CHARGE TO: �� �• I��Q � L�o�. I S �� �d `r1 � CJ
10. CONTRACTREVIEW 1NITIAL/DATEREVIEWED INITIAI./DATEAPPROVED
�PROJECTMANAGER ��- �'Z,'Z�"�, () 9
O DIRECTOR
❑ WSK MANAGEMENT (IF.�PLicaBLE) _
1�'cLaw �P C2-2R�o�
�hc� �o� -l� 4�ecar�-u � x
1 L CONT CT SIGNATITRE ROUTING OY�- �� l�`�°-o
SENT TO VENDOR/CONTRACTOR DATE SENT: j' � O� DATE REC'D: I�_�=0 -�_
❑ ATTACH: SIGNATURE AUTHORITY, 1NSURANCE CERTIFICATE, LICENSES, EXHIBITS
IT1AL / DATE SIGNED
�AW DEPART NT , .-
�GNATORY C R DIRECTOR� , f�/ } (/11 / �
�C CLERK � '�\- Z � C7 C�Y1r�
�A� SIGNED AG# AG# \�- OC7`
�YSIGNED COPY RETURNED DATE SENT: �•\\• 2D 1t7 C►�y�
COMMENTS�
4/9
❑ HUMAN SERVICES / CDBG
❑ SECURITY DOCUMENT �E.G. BOiVDRELATEDDOC:[JMENTS)
❑ RESOLUTION
� ���e� �a�
� � .. �
::fT`.' �-iP.:1
3•�JLJ Lf�{ lf!L��^::I?_. ._<II�i �! ° f"S.✓ �t2.� :�
��':k:C:�� i'. �I'i%1 �'3Y�l. i:i•�7�C�'
�2a3? ?a5-?'wf�'J
:`l,4't�F.C."ifi� �%;�di j8: J:si43t:+.'it.it
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR
LEGISLATIVE LOBBYING SERVICES
This Professional Services Agreement ("Agreement") is made between the City of Federal Way, a Washington
municipal corporation ("City"), and Outcomes by Levy, a sole proprietor ("Contractor"). The City and Contractor
(together "Parties") are located and do business at the below addresses which shall be valid for any notice required
under this Agreement:
INSERT CONTRACTOR'S CO. NAME: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY:
Outcomes by Levy Linda Farmer
15619 62 Pl. NE 33325 8` Ave. S.
Kenmore, WA 98028 P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
425-424-9110 (telephone) (253) 835-241 l (telephone}
425-424-3105 (facsimile) (253) 835-2409 (facsimile)
levy4 @msn. com linda. farmer@cityoffederalway. com
The Parties agree as follows:
l. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon the effective date of this Agreement, which shall be the
date of rnutual execution, and shall continue until the corrtpletion of the Work, but in any event no later than September 30,
2010 ("Term"). This Agreement may be extended for additional periods of time upon the mutual written agreement of the
City and the Contractor.
2. SERVICES. The Contractor shall perform the services more specifically described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto
and incorparated by this reference ("Services"), in a manner consistent with the accepted professional practices for other
similar services within the Puget Sound region in ef.fect at the time those services are performed, performed to the City's
satisfaction, within the time period prescnbed by the City and pursuant to the direcrion of the City Manager or his or her
designee. The Contractar warrants that it has the requisite training, skill, and experience necessary to provide the Services
and is appropriately accredited and licensed by all applicable agencies and governmental entities, incIuding but not limited to
obtaining a City of Federal Way business registration. Services shall begin immediately upon the effective date of this
Agreement. Services shall be suhject, at all times, to inspection by and approval of the Ciry, but the making (ar failure or
delay in making) such inspection or approval shall not relieve Contractor of responsibility far performance of the Services in
accordance with this Agreement, notwithstanding the City's knowledge of defective or non-complying performance, its
substantiality ar the ease of its discovery.
3. TERMINATION. Either party may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, upon providing the other
party thirty (30) days written notice at its address set forth above. The City may terminate this Agreement immediately if the
Contractor fails to maintain required insurance policies, breaches confidentiality, or materially violates Section 12; and such
may result in ineligibility for further City agreements.
4. COMPENSATION.
4.1 Amount. In return for the Services, the City shall pay the Contractor an amount not to exceed a maximum
amount and according to a rate or nlethod as delineated in Exhi�bit "B", attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
The Contractor agrees that any hourly or fIat rate charged by it for its services contracted for herein shall remain locked at the
negotiated rate(s) for a period of one (1) year from the effective date of this Agreement. Except as otherwise provided in
Exhibit "B", the Contractor shall be solely responsible for the payment of any taxes irr�posed by any lawful jurisdiction as a
result of the performance and payment of this Agreement.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT l0/16/09
� ���� t��
- _ � �
::iT;� :-�A.��L
? ��'L"v °th f±i�:?: ;�Q :<t3t ^� > #='f ; �t� < :�? � Y
F�:�k:F�� �; .'2F'3,'•I �n �Fi;?�s.�-9�"$
�2u3; �-'s5-7�•t��
,ixY•r•.c.nn,s"a<!e: �?sz3:� r� :.:tc
42 Method of Pa On a monthly basis, the Contractor shalt submit a voucher ar invoice in the form
specified by the City, including a description of what Services have been performed, the name of the personnel performing
such Services, and any hourly labor charge rate for such personnel. The Contractor shall also submit a final bill upon
complerion of all Services. Payment shall be made on a monthly basis by the City only after the Services have been
performed and within thirty (30) days after receipt and approval by the appropriate City representative of the voucher ar
invoice. If the Services do not meet the requirements of this Agreement, the Contractor will correct or modify the work to
comply with the Agreement. The City may withhold payment for such wark until the work meets the requirements of the
Agreement.
4.3 Non-A�propriation of Funds. If sufficient funds are not appropriated or allocated for payment under this
Agreement for any future fiscal period, the Ciry wil} not be obligated to make payments for Services or amounts incurred
after the end of the current fiscal period, and this Agreement will terminate upon the completion of all remaining Services far
which funds are allocated. No penalry ar expense shall accrue to the City in the event this provision applies.
5, INDEMNIFICATION
5.1 Contractor Indemnification. The Contractor agrees to release, indemnify, defend, and hold the City, its
elected officials, officers, employees, agents, representatives, insurers, attorneys, and volunteers harmless from any and all
claims, demands, actions, suits, causes of action, arbitrations, mediations, proceedings, judgments, awards, injuries, damages,
liabiliries, taxes, losses, fines, fees, penalties expenses, attorney's fees costs, and/or litigation expenses to or by any and all
persons or entities, including, without limitadon, their respecrive agents, licensees, or representarives; arising from, resulting
from, or in connection with this Agreement or the acts, errors or omissions of the Contractor in performance of this
Agreement, except for that portion of the claims caused by the City's sole negligence. Should a court of competent
jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out
of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Contractor
and the City, the Contractor's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Contractor's negligence. Contractor shall
ensure that each sub-contractar shall agee to defend and indemnify the City, its elected of�cials, officers, employees, agents,
representatives, insurers, attorneys, and volunteers to the extent and on the same terms and conditions as the Contractar
pursuant to this paragraph. The City's inspection or acceptance of any of Contractor's work when completed shall not be
grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification.
5.2 Industrial Insurance Act Waiver. It is specifically and expressly understood that the Contractor waives any
immunity that may be granted to it under the Washington State industrial insurance act, Title Sl RCW, solely for the
purposes of this indemnification. Contractor's indemnification shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the
amount of damages, compensation or benefits payable to or by any third party under workers' compensation acts, disability
benefit acts or any other benefits acts or programs. The Parties acknowledge that they have mutually negotiated this waiver.
5.3 City Indemnification. The City agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the Contractor, its officers,
directors, shareholders, partners, employees, agents, representatives, and sub-contractors harrriless from any and all claims,
demands, actions, suits, causes of action, arbitrations, mediations, proceedings, judgments, awards, injuries, damages,
liabilities, losses, fines fees, penalties expenses, attorney's fees, costs, and/or litigation expenses to or by any and all persons
or entities, including without limitation, their respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising from, resulting from or
connected with this Agreement to the extent solely caused by the negligent acts, errors, or omissions of the City.
5.4 Survival. The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Ageement with
respect to any event occurring prior to such expiration or termination.
6. INSURANCE. Tl�e Contractor agrees to carry insurance for liability which may arise from or in connection with the
performance of the services or work by the Contractor, their agents, representarives, employees or subcontractors, as
provided in Exhibit "C" , attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, for the duration of the Agreement and thereafter
with respect to any event occurring prior to such expiration or termination. The provisions of this Section shall survive the
expiration or terminahon of this Agreement.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 10/l6/09
' ° ���� ��
� � �
:i3"�' i-�;?i.�
3:3:i'Ls °#t� ki�"�:�Q _�u� �it' 4 � t ; �s�X :;%'# �
��::k:t,`�� �;+,�'S, �l.`�t'�3�.?n3•�3?":£�
,2a3? ��5-?t�t��
:Y{Lr?'.Cfii:>�:`c�i!8:r�:{:t3f t;:.:tZ
7. CONFIDENTIALITY. All information regarding the City obtained by Contractor in performance of this Agreement
shall be considered confidential subject to applicable laws. Breach of confidentiality by the Contractor may be gounds for
immediate termination. All records submitted by the City to the Contractor will be safeguarded by the Contractor. The
Contractor will fully cooperate with the City in identifying, assembling, and providing records in case of any public records
disclosure request.
8. WORK PRODUCT. All originals and copies of work product, including plans, sketches, layouts, designs, design
specificarions, records, files, corr�uter disks, magnetic media or material which may be produced or modified by Contractor
while performing the Work shall belong to the City upon delivery. The Contractor shall make such data, documents, and
files available to the City and shall deliver all needed ar contracted for work product upon the City's request_ At the
expiration or termination of this A� aIl originals and capies of any such work product remaining in the possession of
Contractor shall be delivered to the City.
9. BOOKS AND RECORDS. The Contractor agrees to maintain books, records, and documents which sufficiently
and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs related to the performance of the Wark and maintain such accounting
procedures and practices as may be deemed necessary by the City to assure proper accounting of all funds paid pursuant to
this Agreement. These records shall be subject, at all reasonable times, to inspection, review or audit by the City, its
authorized representadve, the State Auditar, oT other governmental officials authorized by law to monitor this Agreement.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Parties intend that the Contractor shall be an independent contractor and
that the Contractor has the ability to control and direct the performance and details of its work, the City being interested only
in the results obtained under this Agreement. The City shall be neither liable nor obligated to pay Contractor sick leave,
vacation pay ar any other benefit of employment, nar to pay any social security or other tax which may arise as an incident of
employment. Contractar shall take all necessary precautions and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents,
and subcontractors in the perforn�ance of the contract wark and shall utilize a11 protection necessary for that purpose. All
work shall be done at Contractor's own risk, and Contractor shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools,
or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. The Contractor shall pay all income and other taxes due
except as specifically provided in Section 4. Industrial or any other insurance that is purchased for the benefit of the City,
regardless of whether such may provide a secondary or incidental benefit to the Contractar, shall not be deemed to convert
this Agreement to an employment contract. If the Contractor is a sole proprietarship or if this Agreement is with an
individual, the Contraetor agrees to notify the City and complete any required form if the Contractor retired under a State of
Washington retirement system and agrees to indemnify any losses the City may sustain through the Contractor's failure to do
so.
ll. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. It is recognized that Contractor may or will be performing professional services
during the Term for other parties; however, such perforn�ance of other services shall not conflict with or interfere with
Contractor's ability to perform the Services. Contractar agrees to resolve any such conflicts of interest in favor of the City.
Contractor confirms that Contractor does not have a business interest or a close family relationship with any City officer or
employee who was, is, or will be involved in the Contractor's selection, negotiation, drafting, signing, administrarion, or
evaluating the Contractor's performance.
12. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER. In all services, programs, activities, hiring, and employment made
possible by or resulting from this Agreement ar any subcontract, there shall be no discrimination by Contractor or its
subcontractors of any level or any of those entities' employees, agents, subcontractors or representatives against any person
because of sex, age (except minimum age and retirement provisions), race, color, religion, creed, national origin, marital
status, or the presence of any disabiliry, including sensory, mental ar physical handicaps, unless based upon a bona fide
occupational qualification in relationship to hiring and employment. This requirement shall apply, but not be limited to the
following: employment, advertising, layoff or ternvnation, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for
training, including apprenticeship. Contractor shall comply with and shall not violate any of the terms of Chapter 49.60
RCW, Title VI of the Civi1 Rights Act of 1964, the Americans With Disabilities Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, 49 CFR Part 21, 21.5 and 26, or any other applicable federal, state, or local law or regulation regarding non-
discrimination.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 10/I6/09
' ' ��'��` £P� afT" :-i,?�L
� � +-'��JLJ L � #h r�i��^;:�Q ��E3L�t'a � �£_; �r;< ; %'t �
��:;ec�� s',��s,'i';%�F:?n;�•�3?':�
�2a3: �:#5-?n4��
.`I,:'t�ttC:fic'•ftd.fi;: a;}i£3i':-:;•;t;
13. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
13.1 Interpretation and Modification. This Agreement, together with any attached Exhl`bits, contains all of the
agreements of the Parties with respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this Agreement and no prior statements ar
agreements, whether oral or written, shall be effective for any purpose. Should any language in any Exhibits to this
Agreement conflict with any language in this Agreement, the tem�s of this Agreement shall prevail. The respective captions
of the Secrions of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed to modify or
otherwise affect any of the provisions of this Agreement. Any provision of this Agreement that is declared invalid,
inaperative, null and void, or illegal shall in no way affect or invalidate any other provision hereof and such other provisions
shall remain in full force and effect. Any act done by either Party prior to the effecrive date of the Agreement that is
consistent with the authority of the Agreement and compliant with the terms of the Agreement, is hereby rarified as having
been performed under the Agreement. No provision of this Agreement, including this provision, may be amended, waived,
or modified except by written agreement signed by duly authorized representatives of the Parties.
13.2 Assignment and Beneficiaries. Neither the Contractor nar the City shall have the right to transfer ar assign,
in whole or in part, any or all of its obligations and rights hereunder without the prior written consent of the other Party. If the
non-assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the tern�s of this Agreement shall conrinue in full farce and effect
and no further assignment shall be made without additional written consent. Subject to the foregoing, the rights and
obligations of the Parries shall inure to the bene�t of and be binding upon their respective successors in interest, heirs and
assigns. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the Parties hereto. No other person or
entity shall have any right of action or interest in this Agreement based on any provision set forth herein.
I3.3 Compliance with Laws. The Contractor shall comply with and perform the Services in accordance with all
applicable federal, state, local, and city laws including, without limitation, all City codes, ordinances, resolutions, regularions,
rules, standards and policies, as now existing or hereafter amended, adopted, or made effective. If a violarion of the City's
Ethics Resolution No. 91-54, as amended, occurs as a result of the formarion or performance of this Agreement, this
Agreement may be rendered null and void, at the City's option.
13.4 Enforcement. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of its provisions in which
performance is a factor. Adherence to completion dates set forth in the description of the Services is essential to the
Contractor's performance of this Agreement. Any notices required to be given by the Parties shall be delivered at the
addresses set forth at the beginning of this Agreement. Any norices may be delivered personally to the addressee of the
notice or may be deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the address set forth above. Any notice so posted in
the United States mail shall be deemed received three (3) days after the date of mailing_ Any remedies provided for under the
terms of this Agreement are not intended to be exclusive, but shall be cumulative with all other remedies a�ailable to the City
at law, in equity or by statute. The failure of the City to insist upon strict perforn�ance of any of the covenants and agreements
contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this flgreement in one or more instances shall not be
construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in
full force and effect. Failure or delay of the City to declare any breach or default immediately upon occurrence shall not
waive such breach or default. Failure of the City to declare one breach ar default does not act as a waiver of the City's right
to declare another breach or default. This Agreement shall be made in, governed by, and interpreted in accordance with the
laws of the State of Washington. If the Parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claim arising from this
Agreement, the exclusive means of resoiving that dispute, difference, or claim, shall be by filing suit under the venue, rules
and jurisdicrion of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an
alternative process. If the King County Superior Court does not have jurisdiction over such a suit, then suit may be filed in
any other appropriate court in King County, Washington. Each party consents to the personal jurisdiction of the state and
federal courts in King County, Washington and waives any objection that such courts are an inconvenient forum If either
Party brings any claim or lawsuit arising from this Agreement, each Party shall pay all its legal costs and attorney's fees and
expenses incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, including all appeals, in addition
to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided, however, however nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to
limit the Parties' nghts to indemnification under Section 5 of this Agreement.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 10/16/09
���� ��
� �
::iT�' :-iA.i.L
?:��Z:a °it� fti�";�Q c<F3t.?,�'s � �£_; �t_f< �%'#�
�rr.>:€?F�`• :'>.'��.'4'••'A�Fi:?�s�•9?'�£�
;2a3i �-.�s5-?�s�J
;`i';,@F'.CifiE'�+;rC3Y".:v.p:C3i't� '
13.5 Execurion. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City and Contractor represents and
warrants that such individual is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in
any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and with the same effect as if all Parties hereto had
signed the same document. All such counteiparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one instrument, but in
making proof hereof it shall only be necessary to produce one such counterpart. The signature and acknowledgment pages
from such counterparts may be assembled together to form a single instrument comprised of all pages of this Agreement and
a complete set of all signature and acknowledgment pages. The date upon which the last of all of the Parties have executed a
counterpart of this Agreement shall be the "date of mutual execution" hereof.
[Signature page follows]
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT _ 10/16/09
• � ��'€�' �f� :�1�#"Y :�i }. {�
�6 � j ; JG� > �li i �!1t`J '.,�Q .`_t�;%�S S ° 7"�{J ��.� 'J � � i 1
F� ;k�E��'s'>.'��, �3+.n �£'x.��•9?":£i
2�3? � s�-?�t��
4Y;b'i•!'.(:if�iEi�c'•C. r7hft34'{ :il};
IN WITNESS, the Parties execute this Agreement below, effective the last date written below.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
By:
Brian Wilson, y Manager/Police Chief
DATE: f�� ��U!()
OUTCOMES BY LEVY
:
Printed Name:
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Carol McNeill , CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Signature on file,�orm approved 3/31/2009 b�
City Attorney, Patricia A Richardson
Title: ���j v _- Q �C�? � �� �._ �, CJ
DATE: i 1 �
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ��(\ )
On this day personally appeared before me, �� �� ��-- �� , to me known to be the
individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and on oath swore that he/she/they executed
the foregoing instrument as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned.
GNEN my hand and official seal this
�� �' TM � y =
�� �1.• , ..... i
� �,v. SSwN F,� ; OQ :
Dro��YAF3Y�� ��
:
.
�: � �•"' :-i
c�' PUg�� s O
N �' - � '•• ? .'f9-�`�. �'���i
+ -�F �F W AS�►����►�
� day of SC�, , 20�
���a
� �t � � n. u. -�-
(typed/printed name of notary)
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington.
My commission expires � � � c ( � � �
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 10/l6/09
' ���� �s�
� � �
.;4T"Y s-1,�:.L
:i�:i2��>`_'ti'4 »S�^::If'• �F3t,�i�3> �^{�; 3r3X �?�£�
�rC.::EtF:i(� '; L�.�F�, kI �£'i'v�'S� •�3T � �r
�2�3i ?=:s5-?�+��
+,r ,cT.t.ri _:f `r.ifr',.>>'ti£tr:>.'� ;st:•
EXHIBIT "A"
SERVICES
The Contractor shall do or provide the following:
In consultation with the City Manager anct/or staff designee, lobby state and local governments and other
organizations as necessary to pursue the City's 20101egislative objectives as approved by Council. Lobbying is
defined as attempting to pass, stop or amend legislation as desired by the City, as well as build a positive
legislative presence for the City through face-to-face, written and electronic communications with appropriate
persons.
Help identify, prioritize and monitor problems and opportunities for the City with respect to issues under
consideration by the State Legislature and State and regional agencies, especially those issues defined in the City's
Annual Legislative Agenda. Stay in touch with issues at the King County level, with the Suburban Cities
Association and with the Association of Washington Cities.
Specific duties include: � - - - - -
• Assist in identifying and prioritizing City issues prior to the 2010 Legislative ssion, including meeting��,,
with Department heads and managers, and meetings with the 30th District Legisl ors.
• Work with City Manager and/or staff designee to prepare the City's 2010 egislative Agenda.
• Brief the City Council on the Legislative Agenda at the 3anuary 2010 State Legislative Breakfast.
• Attend meetings of the City Council, City Council committees, and with City personnel as reasonably
requested.
• Complete in a timely and accurate fashion all forms and reports required of lobbyists by the state and other
lawful jurisdictions.
• Provide a brief plan for Off-Session work, if applicable, then subsequent follow up on that work.
Provide correspondence to the City Manager and/or staff designee for the following:
• Telephone or e-mail updates on pending issues as they arise
• A brief weekly written status report during the Legislative Session
• A final written report and in-person presentation at the end of the Legislative Session
Off-session projects as they arise
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 10/16/09
' ��'��t' £�t�
� � �
EXHIBIT "B"
COMPENSATION
afT`� :-�.:..�
�` �;iZ"i °ih r`SV�^:€�s_? ��i3t�^�I't ° #-�f ; 34X :� %1 `
��C;�FN�'S'.j�s, �t3` ��i`C?:'S�•�?"�
�Z..�iJ� .�..
;`I.�b'.4.CifYir.�ifl-�:'r1'Sif3i�t' _tsy,•
l. Total Compensation: In return for the Services, the City shall pay the Contractor an amount not to exceed
Forty three Thousand Three Hundred Seventy-two and No/100 Dollars ($43,372.00).
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ]0/16/09
• � ����€ ��
• _ � �
�1T� :i,?��L
3��JL."S °�'4 T`��,'1^'?e:i3f_? ��F33.�T�"s � �''<._; �C_�;< :�?"��
F��rec�� s.s.��s, �i3�_n ��:'ri3•9?"$
;2a3i ?-.�s5-7�'i3�3
.`f„ :•b•.Ci�`i�:•�c:ifE.'a:tYZ?i'?'�:
EXHIBIT "C"
INSURANCE
1. The Contractor agrees to carry as a minimum, the following insurance, in such forms and with such carriers
who have a rating that is satisfactory to the City:
a. Commercial general liability insurance covering liability arising from premises, operations,
independent contractors, products-completed operations, stop gap liability, personal injury, bodily injury, death,
property damage, products liability, advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract with limits
no less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence and $1,000,000 general aggregate.
b. Workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance in amounts sufficient pursuant to the laws
of the State of Washington;
c. Automobile liability insurance covering all owned, non-owned, hired and leased vehicles with a
minimum combined single limits in the minimurr► amounts required to drive under Washington State law per
accident for bodily injury, including personal injury or death, and property damage.
d. Professional liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000
policy aggregate for damages sustained by reason of or in the course of operation under this Agreement, whether
occurring by reason of acts, errors or omissions of the Contractor.
2. Contractor's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the
liability of the Contractor to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any
remedy available at law or in equity. The Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect
the City. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the
Contractor's insurance and shalI not contribute with it.
3. The City shall be named as additional insured on all such insurance policies, with the exception of any
professional liability insurance and any workers' compensation coverage(s) if Contractor participates in a state-run
workers' compensation program. Contractor shall provide certificates of insurance, concurrent with the execution
of this Agreement, evidencing such coverage and, at City's request, furnish the City with copies of all insurance
policies and with evidence of payment of premiums or fees of such policies. All insurance policies shall contain a
clause of endorsement providing that they may not be terminated or materially amended during the Term of this
Agreement, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. If Contractor's insurance policies are
"claims made," Contractor shall be required to maintain tai] coverage for a minimum period of three (3) years from
the date this Agreement is actually terminated or upon project completion and acceptance by the City.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 10/l6/09
��� �s . 1- IF: �. IIIL'=�It�' � . . • - �.�rj �
12l04/2009 17:15 4254248921
OUTCOMESBYLEVY
PoUcy Number: 45459806•Q
DOUGlAS R LEVY
1'ERFSA J IEVY
Page 1
MCCIAIN IN5 SERVICES
1041019TH AVE SE 101
EVERETT, WA 98208
DOUGIAS R LEVY
TERESAI LEVY
15619 62N0 PL NE
KENMORE, WA 98028
�.NnKs
800-925-xf86
To repat a clalm.
Personal Umbrella Insurante
Coverage Suminary
This is your Declarations Page
Your coverage beg1�5 on November 30, 2009 at the latcr af 12:01 a.m. or the effectfve time shown on your appllcation, Tha
policy period ends on hbvember 30,1010 at i2:01 a.m.
Your insu►anre poifcy and any poliry endorsemenu contain a fuli explanacion of your covQroge: The poGcy conaact is form 9639
(03/06). The cormacc fs modiiied by forms 7.3i 7(03/06>, Z322 (03l06j, Z318 (03/06�, Z320 (03/06), Z321(03l06), Z3f 9(03/�f�,
Z746 Wq I01/09), and 9869U WA (05/08).
Outline of coverage
General poliry coverage
Personal Umbrefla
Ciablllty to Others
Ta�a112 n►onth po�ty poemlum
Requirement af underlying insurance
PAGE 02
Policy number. 4S4S980&0
Underwritten by�
P�9�� Northvrestern IIK Co
December t, 2009
PoAcy Verfetl:Nov 30, 20D9- Nev 30, 2pt0
Page 2
425�379-9200
MCCtAlN INS SERViCES
Contact yeur agmt for personalited smice.
Stl( inwled tr.IMtIOn Mqipium
51,000,000 perocarrence 5250 E 528
S S28
By accepting tf►e terms of this policy, you agree to maintain the m�nimum required underlying liabiliry Ilmlis as stated in the
fotlowlnq section for all scheduled vehicles, sc�eduled watercraft and scheduled premises. Your f�lure ta do so will cause you to
be tiable for payment of wch limits,
�� P°���Y Minimum raquaed underying lieb�ity Hmitc
....... ............................ .............
... .................. ........................................................... ...........
Comprehensive personaf (iabllf ' '"""
�Y �300,000 comb�ned s'rngle I{mk
........................................ �� •-...,.....
.........................................................................................
Veh►cle liabiliry �250,006/S5pp.000 split Nmiu or 5300,�0� combined single limit
................................... .....
...................................................... ...,..............,.......
Watercraft liabtll ........ ... .............
ry �250,000/5500,000 spGt limits or 5300,000 mmbined single lirt►it
rbrm WE9 wAl05i08)
� . � - ��:�iI� • � 3: � : . � . - � .
12/04/2009 17:15 4254248921
DUTCOMESBYLEUY
PAGE 03
Poliq Number dS454806•0
DOUGlAS R IEVY
TERESA 1 L�vY
Page 3
Drivers and household residents AddMbn�i 1�1Mmatan
DOUGLAS LEVY .............. .................._.... ..Nemed lnsured .........,.... ..... . .........__..........,.,........_.. .,..,.
.............................. ...... ,
_ ........._....... .................
.................................... ..................... _.....,.....,. .....
tERESA 1 LEW Named fnwred
.............. .......�,,,............ ...,.....,....,.. ... . .,...... ........,,....,,.....
ZACHARV IEVy .. .................. ......................
Scheduled exposures
We have issued th�s �nwrance based upon the exposures Iisted in the tollowing section. !f there are changes in
exposures, advise your agent �mmedlatNy so that we may consider those exposures for coverage. Fa�lure ro
timely report changes in exposures in accordance w�th the terms and mnditions of the policy will resuh in no
insurance baing aiforded by this polity.
Scheduled vehicles
Automobiles, motar homes, and mota coaches
�eer Mekc Mode! y�p
2000 .............p .. ,,,......,......
DURANGO . . �.... � . �. 164HS28Z5YF29Z374 �..... .
2009 ......... .... .,.,.,..,........ ...,..,.,...
.. ..... ... .. . .. .... ... . ......... ... ........ . . ...........
CO�PER S WMWMF73579TX40749
..................... ,......,.............,.,
2007 TOYOTA ' .......................................................
�... . . ....� ..� PRIUS . .... . . ..... .. lTDK620U973214544
SchedWed watertr�ait
Bo�ts and personal weteraaR
vea� Make ModN Mla
.. ............ ............................................... ........
.. ......... ........................................
20�i BAY�INER 180 CAPRI BIYEbOC1K001
Stheduled p►etnises
Resldances
4ddrCSS (Street, (Iry, State, 7.ip)
.... ..........................................................
15619 62ND Pl NE. K�NMORE, WA 96028 .....� �. ........ .. .......'. ..,
Premium discounts -
��
454 ... ....................
598Q6-0
....................
. . ....,.... .,.,.
mulii�pollry
tompany officers
��.
Secretary
roh„ b�es wa royoa�
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: , �C�p�,i�' � � � �,� ITEM # �
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: CRIMIIvAL CODE UPDATE - LEWD CONDUCT
POLICY QUESTION: SHOULD THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND CHAPTER 6.45 OF THE FEDERAL WAY REVISED
CODE TO ADD A NEW SECTION PROHIBITING LEWD CONDUCT`I
COMMITTEE: PRHS&PS
CATEGORY:
❑ Consent � Ordinance
❑ City C oun c il B ❑ R
STAFF REPORT BY: ASSISTANT CHIEF ANDY HWANG
MEETING DATE: September 14, 2010
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
DEPT: FWPD
Background: Cw the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) does not address lewd conduct. This
proposed ordinance would amend Chapter 6.45 FWRC to define lewd conduct and prohibit lewd conduct in
public. This new legislation would elinvnate some gray areas, fill a gap left by indecent exposure and provide
police officers with another enforcement tool to keep our city safe.
Attachments: Proposed ordinance amending Chapter 6.45 FWRC to define and prohibit lewd conduct in public.
Options Considered: �Approve the proposed ordinance modifying Chapter 6.45 FWRC.
2 Reject the proposed ordmance modifymg Chapter 6 45 FWRC.
STAF'F RECOM1vIENDAT�oN: Approve Option 1 to forward the proposed ordinance to First Reading at the
September 21s` Ciry Council Meetii7g. �
I ���„" U , (.✓, y , �, ��3.��'
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: �,y�J� I�n �• !� 1 �I DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
Comrnittee Counc�l Co� Cou cil
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the proposed or�dinunce to First Reading on September 21'S'
l s �` READING oF ORDINA1vcE (SEP'r. 21, 2010): I m.ove to forward the ordinance to a second reading for
enactfnent on tlie October• S, 2010 consent agenda.
Z ND READING OF ORDINANCE (OCTOBER 5, 2010): `7 move approval of the proposed ordinance mod�ing
Federal Way Revised Code Chapter 6.45 to add a new section prohibiting lewd conduct. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFIC'EJ
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ Al'PROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DF�'lEP I '
❑ 'I:4BLEll/DEFERRED/NO AC'1'lON Euactment reading ��� ' � ('
� MOVED TO SECOND READING (or•dinances or�ly) ORDINANCE #
REVISED — 02/06/2U06 RESOLUTION #
PROPOSED COUNC[L MOTION(S):
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to
lewd conduct, amending FWRC 6.45.010, "Definitions" and adding a
new section to Chapter 6.45 FWRC, "Public Morals" (Amending Ord.
Nos. 09-601, 91-94, 91-89, and 90-53.)
WHEREAS, the City has adopted regulations set forth in Chapter 6.45 of the Federal Way
Revised Code that govern public morals; and
WHEREAS, the City has not adopted regulations that prohibit lewd conduct in public places;
and
WHEREAS, the City desires to adopt regulations that prohibit said conduct; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance is in the interest of the public's health, safety and welfare;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Federal Way Revised Code 6.45.010 Definitions is hereby amended to read as
follows:
6.45.010 Definitions.
The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly
requires otherwise. Terms not defined here are defined according to FWRC 1.05.020.
"Act of prostitution" or "prostitution" means engaging, offering to engage, or agreeing
to engage in sexual contact or sexual conduct with any person in return for a fee.
"Actor" means a person who engages in conduct in violation of this chapter.
"Exposed" means the state of being revealed, exhibited or otherwise rendered to public
view.
"Expressive dance" means any dance which, when considered in the context of the entire
performance, constitutes an expression of theme, stoiy, or ideas, but excluding any dance
such as, but not limited to, common barroom-type topless dancing which, when
considei•ed in the context of the entu performance, is presented primarily as a means of
displaying nudity as a sales device oi• for otheY commercial exploitation without substantial
expression of theme, story or ideas, and the conduct appeals to the prurient interest,
depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way and lacks serious literasy, artistic,
U��clinunce 1'Vo. 10- Page 1 of 4
Rev 1/10
political or scientific value.
"Fee" means money, any negotiable instrument, any good or service having value, or any
other consideration.
"Known prostitute or panderer" means a person who, within one year prior to the date
of a�7�est for a violation of this chapter, has been convicted of a ci violation of any
oi�dinance or law of any jurisdiction within the state pi•ohibiting acts of soliciting,
committing, or offei•ing oi agi•eeing to commit pi
"Public Place" means an area e�nerallv visible to �ublic view and includes streets,
sidewalks brid e� s allevs �lazas parks drivew�s �arking lots automobiles (whether
movin og r not and buildings o�en to the general�ublic, including those which serve food
or drink or provide entertainment and the doorways and entrances to buildin�s or
dwellin�s and the grounds enclosin� them and businesses contained in structures which
can serve customers who remain in their vehicles by means of a drive-up window.
"Sexual conduct" means:
(1) Sexual intercourse within its ordinary meaning, occurring upon any penetration,
however slight;
(2) Any penetration of the vagina or anus, however slight, by an object, when committed
on one person by another, whether such persons are of the same or opposite sex, except
when such penetration is accomplished for medically recognized treatment or diagnostic
puiposes;
(3) Any act of sexual contact between persons involving the sex organs of one person and
the mouth or anus of another whether such persons are of the same or opposite sex; and
(4) Masturbation, manual or instrumental, of one person by another.
"Sexual contact" means any touching of the sexual or other intimate parts of a person
done foi the pui of gratifying sexual desire of either party.
Section 2. Chapter 6.45 of the Federal Way Revised Code is hereby amended to add a
new section to read as follows:
6.45.025 Lewd Conduct
� 11 A�erson is �uilty of lewd conduct if in a public�lace the person intentionall�
( al E�oses anv of the followin� body_parts of the person without a full and
opaque coverin�:
(il Any�art of the male or female �enitals pubic hair, �ubic area,
perineum anus or bottom one-half of the anal cleft;
�ii) Any_part of the areola or ni�le of the female breast; or
�iu) More than one-half of the part of the female breast located below the
to� of the a��eola The covered area shall be reasonabl�compact and
conti�uous to the areola.
�b) Exposes the male �enitals in a discerniblv tur�id state even if fully and
�aquelX covered.
� Touches caresses or fondles the genitals oi• female breast whether clothed or
Ordinance No. 10- Page 2 of 4
Rev 1/10
unclothed;
�d) Masturbates; or
( e) En in sexual conduct or sexual contact.
�2) A full and opac�ue coverin� within the meanin� of this section does not include bodv
paint bodv dye tattoos latex tape or any similar substance applied to the skin surface,
anv substance that can be washed off the skin, o anv substance designed to simulate or
bv which bv its nature simulates the a �pearance of the anatomical area beneath it.
�3) This section shall not be construed to prohibit:
( a) The act of breastfeedin o� r ex �ressinp breast milk;
�b) Classes seminars and lectures held far serious scientific or educational
pur�oses;
( Pla ys o�eras musicals or other dramatic works which are not obscene
�dl Adult entertainment activities operating uursuant to Chapter 12.10 FWRC;
�el Bathhouse activities o�eratin�pursuant to Chapter 12.40 FWRC.
�fl Conduct of a child under 10 year of a�; or
�g) Places in which nudity is necessarilv and customarilv expected outside of the
home such as a restroom or lockei� room.
�� The ownei lessee manager oUerator or othez �erson in char e� of a public place is
guilty of facilitatin� lewd conduct if the Uerson knowingly �ermits, encourages, or
causes to be corrunitted lewd conduct.
�5) Lewd conduct and facilitating lewd conduct is a misdemeanor.
Section 3. Severabilitv. Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or
phrase of this chapter, or its application to any person or situation, be declared unconstitutional or
invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
chapter or its application to any other person or situation. The City Council of the City of Federal
Way hereby declares that it would have adopted this chapter and each section, subsection,
sentence, clauses, phi�ase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, oi portions be declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
Section 4. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized
to make necessaiy con•ections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of
sci•ivener/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any
Ordinance No. 10- � Page 3 of 4
Rev 1/10
�
references thereto.
Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective
date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affiimed.
Section 6. Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days
fi�om and after its passage and publication, as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of
20
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, LINDA KOCHMAR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, CAROL MCNEILLY, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.:
Or No. 10-
Page 4 of 4
Rev 1/10
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 5, 2010
ITEM #:
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUB.TEC'r: Interlocal Agreement with WSDOT for Fiber Optic Installation (Traffic Busters)
POLICY QUESTION Should Council approve an agreement with WSDOT to construct a fiber-optic cable
connection between City Hall and I-5 for sharing of traffic data?
COMMITTEE Land Use and Transportation Committee
CATEGORY:
� Consent
❑ Ordinance
MEETING DATE: September 20, 2010
❑ Public Hearing
❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY: Rick Perez, P.E., Ci Traffic Engineer DEPT Public Works
_....._.... ...................._........_.._............................_..._.................__........................................_........_.__...._....�'._....._.............................._._.__.. _..............................__....__............._..._............._..._.........................._..._....._..._.._...._.._._._........................._....._......._...___......_.._....
Attachments: Memorandum to Land Use and Transportation Committee dated September 20, 2010.
Options Considered:
1. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.
2. Do not authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement as drafted and provide direction to staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Option 1 be forwarded to the October 5 2010 City Council
Consent Agenda for approval.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: Q. I�n �. 9114 ,�Jb DIRECTOR APPROVAL: �'� ___�/!^ _
Committee Council Committee Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The Committee recommends Option 1 be forwarded to the October 5 2010
City Council Consent Agenda for approval. �-�
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: �Yauthor
optic cable for sharing of tra�c data with
agencies. "
�e the City Manager to execute tl� to construct fiber
Washington State Department of Transportation and other local
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1sT reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED - 02/06/2006 RESOLUTIOIV #
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 20, 2010
TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee
VIA: Brian Wilson, City Manager/ Police Chief
FROM• Cary M. Roe, P.E., Director of Parks, Pu 'c Works, and Emergency Management �
' Rick Perez, P.E., City Traffic Engineer �
SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement with WSDOT for Fiber Optic Installation (Tra�c Busters)
BACKGROUND•
Washington State Department of Transportation has initiated a project to share traffic condition data
between the State and local agencies, called "Traffic Busters". As currently scoped, the project connects
with 22 cities and counties in the region, including Federal Way.
The scope of the project within Federal Way capitalizes on existing fiber optic cable installed by both the
City for traffic signal interconnect and citywide WiFi and King County Metro in support of Transit Signal
Priority for the RapidRide Line A Bus Rapid Transit project. The Traffic Busters project would eliminate
a gap in our otherwise continuous run of 24 strands of fiber between City Hall and I-5, where it connects
to WSDOT's fiber trunk on I-5 to their Traffic Systems Management Center in Shoreline. The gap is on
S 320` Street between 8` Avenue S and SR 99.
WSDOT proposes to complete this gap with 24 strands, of which 2 would be reserved for the purpose of
sharing traffic data under the Traffic Busters program. The City would be free to use the remaining 22
strands however we choose. Preliminarily, these would be used for traffic signal interconnect, Safe City,
and citywide Wi-Fi.
WSDOT proposes to delegate the administration of construction to the City. T'hey have estimated the
construction cost at $73,000, and are proposing to compensate the City for actual costs up to $80,000.
WSDOT would also provide additional hardware and software in City Hall to provide functionality, and
this will be defined under a separate agreement for future consideration by City Council.
cc: Project File
Day File
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
(Fiber Installation in City Conduit in City Right of Way)
THIS INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT (Agreement) is made and entered into by and between the
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (WSDOT) and the CITY OF FEDERAL
WAY (CITY).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, WSDOT has deployed the "WSDOT Statewide Intelligent Transportation Systems
(ITS) Plan", with the goal of improving transportation safety and mobility and enhance productivity through
the use of advanced communication technologies into the transportation infrastructure and vehicles,
encompassing a broad range of wireless and wire line communications-based information and electronics
technologies, and
WHEREAS, WSDOT's Northwest Region is implementing a regional project called the "Traffic
Buster" system, herein the "System Network," which will allow approximately twenty local agencies in the
central Puget Sound to connect to WSDOT fiber optic nefinrork and exchange traffic video, and
WHEREAS, the CITY will be a participating agency in the System Nefinrork; and
WHEREAS, it is of mutual benefit to both PARTIES for the CITY to connect to the System
Network, the PARTIES hereby wish to establish the roles of the PARTIES for the installation, operation
and maintenance of the System Network, and
WHEREAS, it is to the mutual advantage of the CITY and WSDOT to enter into this Agreement,
which Agreement is authorized by RCW 39.34.030 and RCW 4728.140.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, covenants, and performances contained herein it
is mutually agreed as follows:
1 PURPOSE.
1.1 It is the purpose of this Agreement to set forth the terms and conditions by which the
PARTIES shall install, maintain and operate the System Network and interconnect to the
System Network located within each PARTIES respective rights of way at each PARTIES sole
cost, except as detailed in Section 4 of this Agreement.
Page 1 of 10 WSDOT Contract K275
City of Federal Way Contract
1.2 The PARTIES agree to work closely in the operation of the System Network and to notify the
other PARTY when problems occur. If either PARTY requires access to the other PARTY's
cabinet, vault or facility for maintenance or troubleshooting, accompanied access shall be
arranged through the PARTIES per Section 8 Contract Management.
2 TERM
2.1 Initial Term
The initial term of this Agreement shall be five (5) years, commencing upon October 1, 2010
regardless of the date of execution.
2.2 Extension
This Agreement may be extended for one (1) additional five (5) year term by mutual written
agreement of the PARTIES.
3 STATEMENT OF WORK
3.1 Installation of Fiber Optic Cables
The CITY or its assigned shall:
3.1.1 Provide and install a 24 strand SM fiber-optic cable from the signal controller cabinet
at the NE corner of S. 320 St and SR99 to the signal controller cabinet at the SW
corner of S. 320 St and 8 Ave S(see Exhibit B).
3.1.2 Provide and install conduit and junction boxes as shown in the p�ovided plans (see
Exhibit B).
3.2 WSDOT's Use of Fiber Strands.
The CITY hereby authorizes WSDOT and WSDOT hereby agrees to use, in accordance with
the terms and conditions herein, 2 strands of the Fiber Cable (Fiber Strands) as described in
Section 3.1 for the purpose of improving transportation safety and mobility.
3.3 Maintenance and Repair of Fiber Optic Cables
The City will maintain, repair and keep the Fiber Cable in a safe manner and in good order
and repair. If maintenance requires access to WSDOT's signal cabinet, the CITY shall notify
WSDOT at least five (5) Business Days in advance for any scheduled maintenance. For
emergency repairs that require access to WSDOT's signal cabinet, the CITY will inform
WSDOT as soon as possible of any emergency work performed, and will provide all relevant
information such as, but not limited to, the nature of the emergency, the locations where
repairs were performed, and whether continuing work is required. For the purposes of this
Agreement, the term "Business Days" shall mean Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m., Pacific Standard Time, except for holidays observed by WSDOT. Maintenance and
repair work shall be performed at the cost of the CITY.
Page 2 of 10 WSDOT Contract K275
City of Federal Way Contract
3,4 Additional Work
Either PARTY may request additional work by submitting a written request detailing the
design, deployment and cost of such work, if to WSDOT, the WSDOT Project Manager, and if
to the CITY, the City Project Manager. Prior to commencement of any such option work, the
scope of work shall be detailed in a written statement of work (SOW) executed by the
appropriate WSDOT Signature Authority listed on Exhibit A, and any revisions thereto, and the
CITY's Chief Information Office, as listed on Exhibit A, and any revisions thereto. Each SOW
shall include the approval date of the agreed upon additional work.
4 CONSIDERATION
The consideration for this Agreement is:
4.1 The CITY agrees:
4.1.1 To install and maintain the Fiber Cable in the Right of Way pursuant to Section 3
above,
4.1.2 To provide WSDOT use of two (2) fiber strands at the location as described in Section
3.1, and as may be modified by an approved SOW, as provided in Section 3.4 herein;
4.1.3 To invoice WSDOT, providing supporting documents for the charges billed. Invoices
and or payments shall not exceed one per month and shall include at a minimum:
a. WSDOT Contract Number K275;
b. Statement of Work Number (if applicable);
c. Description of service;
d. Date service was rendered;
e. Amount invoiced including all applicable discounts & taxes;
f. Total Amount Due.
4.2 WSDOT agrees:
42.1 To provide operational access to the System Network at no cost to the CITY.
4.2.2 To reimburse the CITY for the actual direct salary and direct non salary costs for the
work to include but not limited to the installation of fiber optic cables, as described in
Section 3.1 above.
4.2.3 To pay in cash to the CITY a lump sum amount not to exceed eighty thousand dollars
($80,000) no later than thirty days upon receipt of a properly submitted single invoice.
4.2.4 The consideration provided by each PARTY herein is deemed to be of equivalent
value.
4.2.5 Any additional work, as agreed to pursuant to Section 3.4, shall include compensation
equivalent in value to the work, rights, and obligations agreed to therein.
Page 3 of 10 WSDOT Contract K275
Ciry of Federal Way Contract
5 OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS
The Fiber Cable and appurtenances thereto installed by the CITY in the Right of Way pursuant to this
Agreement shall be deemed the personal property of and owned by the CITY.
6 OVERHEAD, INDIRECT OR ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
Unless otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement, there will be no overhead, indirect or
administrative fees assessed for this Agreement by either PARTY.
7 RECORDS
7.1 The PARTIES shall each maintain books, records, documents and other evidence relating to
this Agreement that sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended by
either PARTY in the performance of this Agreement. These records shall be subject to
inspection, review or audit by personnel of both PARTIES, other personnel duly authorized by
either PARTY, the Office of State Auditor, and federal officials so authorized by law. All
books, records, documents, and other mate�ial relevant to this Agreement will be retained for
six (6) years after termination of this Agreement. Records involving matters in litigation
related to this Agreement shall be kept for either one (1) year following the termination of
litigation, including all appeals, or six (6) years from the date of expiration or termination of this
Agreement, whichever is later.
7.2 Records and other documents, in any medium, furnished by one PARTY to this Agreement to
the other PARTY, will remain the property of the furnishing PARTY, unless otherwise agreed.
Each PARTY will utilize reasonable security procedures and protections to assure that records
and documents provided by the other PARTY are not erroneously disclosed to third PARTIES.
7.3 Notwithstanding the foregoing, the PARTIES acknowledge that any documents and records
that are prepared or created pursuant to this Agreement may be determined to be public
records under the Washington Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW, and as such may be
subject to public disclosure. Each PARTY recognizes that certain documents and records
may contain proprietary information exempt from disclosure under Public Records Act, may
constitute trade secrets as defined in RCW 19.108.010(4) and may include confidential
information which is otherwise subject to protection from misappropriation or disclosure.
Should any documents or records that are prepared or created pursuant to this Agreement
become the subject of a requesf for public disclosure, the following procedures shall apply:
7.3.1 The PARTY who received the disclosure request (Recipient) shall immediately notify
the other PARTY (Owner) of such request and the date by which it anticipates
producing the requested records.
7.3.2 The Owner must then assert in writing to the Recipient any claim that such records
contain proprietary or confidential information that it believes is exempt from
disclosure under the Public Records Act or is subject to protection pursuant to
Chapter 19.108 RCW or other State of Washington law so that Recipient may
consider such assertion in responding to the requestor.
Page 4 of 10 WSDOT Contract K275
City of Federal Way Contract
7.3.3 If the Owner fails to make such assertion within eight (8) days after the date the
Recipient notifies the Owner of its intended response, the Recipient shall have the
right to make such disclosure.
7.3.4 If the Owner makes a timely assertion that the requested records contain proprietary
or confidential information or trade secrets, the Recipient will allow the Owner an
additional ten (10) days for the Owner to seek judicial protection of the records
pursuant to RCW 42.56.540. Such an action shall be at the Owner's expense.
Should the Recipient elect to pa�ticipate in any such action its own attorney's fees will
be the Recipient's expense. If the Owner does not seek judicial protection of the
records within ten (10) days after notifying the Recipient of its belief that the records
contain proprietary or confidential information or trade secrets, then Lessee shall
release the records to the requestor.
7.3.5 If prior to judicial consideration of a challenge by a requester, the Recipient in its sole
discretion believes the Owner does not have a valid claim, it shall so notify the Owner
no less than five (5) days prior to the date the Recipient intends to make the
disclosure to allow the Owner to take such action as it deems appropriate prior to
disclosure. The Recipient will not make such a disclosure while an action to enjoin
disclosure is pending under RCW 42.56.540.
7.3.6 If the Recipient denies a request for public records solely for reasons other than the
Owner's assertion of proprietary or confidential information contained in records, the
Owner has no responsibiliry for payment of any attorneys' fees or fines that may be
imposed on the Recipient, nor for payment of RecipienYs attorneys' fees.
7.3.7 In the event either PARTY believes that any documents or records subject to
transmittal to or review by the other PARTY under the terms of this Agreement contain
proprietary, trade secret or other materials that are exempt or protected from
disclosure pursuant to applicable Laws, the owner of the document shall identify and
clearly mark such information prior to such transmittal or review. The provisions of
this Section 6.3 shall apply even though a PARTY may fail to identify and clearly mark
such information prior to transmittal or review.
7.4 The provisions in this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
8 TERMINATION
8.1 Termination for Convenience
Either PARTY may terminate this Agreement upon ninety (90) calendar days' prior written
notification to the other PARTY. If this Agreement is so terminated, the PARTIES shall be
liable only for performance rendered or costs incurred in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement prior to the effective date of termination.
Page 5 of 10 WSDOT Contract K275
City of Federal Way Contract
8.2 Termination for Default
In the event a PARTY does not timely and properly fulfill the performance of the terms and
conditions of this Agreement, the other PARTY may issue a written notice to the defaulting
PARTY to cure the default within fifteen (15) calendar days of said notice. In the event the
default is not cured within that 15-day period, or such longer period, as may be reasonably
determined by the non-defaulting PARTY, if the defaulting PARTY is diligently working to cure
the default, this Agreement shall terminate without further action of either party.
9 CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
9.1 Contact Information.
All contact information for the management of this agreement shall be identified in Exhibit A.
Exhibit A may be updated by either PARTY for their agency only and shall be submitted in
writing or electronic mail to the other PARTY by the Contract Administrators. Any update to
Exhibit A shall state the effective date of said update.
9.2 Contract Managers
The Contract Managers for both WSDOT and City identified in Exhibit A shall be the primary
contact for ALL communications and billings for the performance of this Agreement. The
Contract Managers shall be responsibte for the daily performance and technical oversight of
this Agreement on behalf of WSDOT and CITY.
9.3 Project Managers
9.3.1 The WSDOT Project Manager identified in Exhibit A shall be lead for WSDOT on all
technical and troubleshooting issues regarding the performance of this Agreement.
The WSDOT Project Manager shall be responsible for facilitating with the WSDOT
Project Manager any interagency technical communications and/or coordination
necessary regarding the business associated with this Agreement.
9.3.2 The CITY Project Manager identified in Exhibit A shall be lead for the CITY on all
technical and troubleshooting issues regarding the performance of this Agreement.
The CITY Project Manager shall be responsible for facilitating with the WSDOT
Project Manager any interagency technical communications and/or coordination
necessary regarding the business associated with this Agreement.
10 DISPUTES
10.1 The Project Managers shall work cooperatively to resolve problems or issues arising under
this Agreement in a timely manner.
10.2 In the event the Project Managers are unable to resolve a dispute, the following individuals are
designated to serve as the representatives of each PARTY (Designated Representatives) and
shall confer to resolve disputes that arise under this Agreement as requested by either
PARTY. The Designated Representative for WSDOT is Grant Rodeheaver, Director of the
Page 6 of 10 WSDOT Contract K275
City of Federal Way Contract
0
O�ce of Information Technology. Designated Representative for the CITY is Brenda Cooper,
Chief Information Officer. The Designated Representatives shall use their best efforts and
exercise good faith to resolve such disputes.
10.3 In the event the Designated Representatives are unable to resolve the dispute, the Assistant
Secretary of Administrative Operations for WSDOT, or his/her designee, and the City Attorney
for the CITY or her/his designee shall confer and exercise good faith to resolve the dispute.
10.4 In the event the Assistant Secretary of Administrative Operations for WSDOT and the City
Attorney for the CITY are unabte to resolve the dispute, the PARTIES may, if mutually agreed
in writing, submit the matter to non-binding mediation. The PARTIES shall then seek to
mutually agree upon the mediation process, who shall serve as the mediator, and the
timeframe the PARTIES are willing to discuss the disputed issue(s).
10.5 Each PARTY shall bring to the mediation session, unless excused from doing so by the
mediator, a representative from its side with full settlement authority. In addition, each PARTY
shall bring counsel and such other persons as needed to contribute to a resolution of the
dispute. The mediation process is to be corisidered settlement negotiations for the purpose of
all state and federal rules protecting disclosures made during such conference from later
discovery or use in evidence; Provided, that any settlement executed by the PARTIES shall
not be considered confidential and may be disclosed. Each PARTY shall pay its own costs for
mediation and share equally in the cost of the mediator. The venue for the mediation shall be
in Olympia, Washington, unless the PARTIES mutually agree in writing to a different location.
10.6 If the PARTIES cannot mutually agree as to the appropriateness of inediation, the mediation
process, who shall serve as mediator, or the mediation is not successful, then either PARTY
may institute a legal action in the County of Thurston, State of Washington, unless other
venue is mutually agreed to in writing. The PARTIES agree that they shall have no right to
seek relief in a cou�t of law until and unless each of the above procedural steps has been
exhausted.
10.7 Continuity of Service.
10.7.1 WSDOT and the CITY agree that, the existence of a dispute notwithstanding, they will
continue without delay to carry out all their respective responsibilities under this
Agreement that are not affected by the dispute.
10.7.2 If the subject of the dispute is the amount due and payable by from one PARTY to the
other, the PARTY providing the services shall continue providing services pending
resolution of the dispute.
11 GOVERNANCE
11.1 This Agreement is entered into pursuant to and under the authority granted by the laws of the
state of Washington and any applicable federal laws. The provisions of this Agreement shall
be construed to conform to those laws.
Page 7 of 10 WSDOT Contract K275
City of Federal Way Contract
91.2 In the event of an inconsistency in the terms of this Agreement, or between its terms and any
applicable statute or rule, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the
following order:
a. Applicable state and federal statutes and rules;
b. Statement of work; and
c. Any other provisions of the Agreement, including materials incorporated by reference.
12 ASSIGNMENT
The work to be provided under this Agreement, and any claim arising thereunder, is not assignable or
delegable by either PARTY in vahole or in part, without the express prior written consent of the other
PARTY, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Provided that nothing herein
precludes WSDOT from contracting out the Fiber Cable installation and maintenance work to third
PARTIES.
13 WAIVER
A failure by either PARTY to exercise its rights under this Agreement shall not preclude that PARTY
from subsequent exercise of such rights and shall not constitute a waiver of any other rights under
this Agreement unless stated to be such in a writing signed by an authorized representative of the
PARTY and attached to the original Agreement. A failure by either PARTY to exercise its rights under
this Agreement shall not preclude that PARTY from subsequent exercise of such rights and shall not
constitute a waiver of any other rights under this Agreement unless stated to be such in a writing
signed by an authorized representative of the PARTY and attached to the original Agreement.
14 SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Agreement or any provision of any document incorporated by reference shall
be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this Agreement which can be
given effect without the invalid provision, if such remainder conforms to the requirements of
applicable law and the fundamental purpose of this agreement, and to this end the provisions of this
Agreement are declared to be severable.
75 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY
The employees or agents of each PARTY who are engaged in the performance of this Agreement
shall continue to be employees or agents of that PARTY and shall not be considered for any purpose
to be employees or agents of the other PARTY.
16 AMENDMENTS
This Agreement may be amended by mutual written agreement of the PARTIES. Such amendments
shall not be binding unless they are in writing and signed by personnel authorized to bind each of the
PARTIES as set forth in Exhibit A.
Page S of 10 WSDOT Contract K275
City of Federal Way Contract
17 EXHIBITS
17.1 Exhibit List
a. Exhibit A: Contacts
b. Exhibit B: Plans
17.2 All exhibits, attachments, and documents referenced in this contract are hereby incorporated
into this Agreement.
18 AGREEMENT EXECUTION
The signatories to this Agreement represent that they have the authority to bind their respective
organizations to this Agreement.
THE REMAIND�R OF 7H1S PAGE 1NTENTIONA�LY LEFT B�ANK
Page 9 of 10 WSDOT Contract K275
City of Federal Way Contract
19 ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN
This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the PARTIES. No other
understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to
exist or to bind any of the PARTIES hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have executed this Agreement.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Brian Wilson
City Manager/Police Chief
Date
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Bill Ford, Assistant Secretary
Administrative Operations
Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardon
Page 10 of 10 WSDOT Contract K275
City of Federal Way Contract
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 5, 2010
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
ITEM #:�_
SUB.IECT: 2010 Asphalt Overlay Project - Final Acceptance
POLICY QITEST'ION Should the City Council accept the 2010 Asphalt Overlay Project constructedby Miles
Resources, LLC, dba, Woodworth & Company, as cornplete?
COMMITT'EE Land Use and Transportation Committee
CAT'EGORY:
� Consent ❑ Ordinance
❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution
MEETIIVG DATE: September 20, 2010
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY: Jeff Hu Street S stems En ineer DEPT Public Works
_..__._ ......................_................................._.......__...._._...----...._...._3'-�'--......_..........._.__._Y....._.._.�...__.............._g .. .. _. ......._=._ ....
Attachments: Memorandum to Land Use and Transportation Corrmrittee dated September 20, 2010.
Options Considered:
1. Authorize final acceptance of the 2010 Asphalt Overlay Project constructed by Miles Resources, LLC
dba, Woodworth & Company, in the amount of $1,461,287.61.
2. Do not authorize final acceptance of the completed 2010 Asphalt Overlay Project constructed by Miles
Resources, LLC dba, Woodworth & Company, as complete and provide direction to staff:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staffrecommends forwarding Oprion 1 to the October 5, 2010 City Council
Consent Agenda for approval.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: �5.�„�I►� y J � DIRECTOR APPROVAL: �''� �
Cmrunittee Council Committee Council
CONIlVIITTEE REC011�IlVIENDATION Committee recommends forwazding Option 1
Council Consent Agenda far approval.
,
Dini Duclos. Chair Ji errell, Member
to the October 5, 2010 City
, Member
PROPOSED CoUNCIIJ MoTION: "I o e approval of final acceptance of the 2010 Asphalt Overlay Project
constructed by Miles Resources, LLC dba, Woodworth & Company, in the amount of $1,461,287.61 as
complete. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COLJNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPRO VED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED — 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION #
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
September 20, 2010
Land Use and Transportation Committee
Brian Wilson, City Manager/Police Chief
Cary M. Roe, P.E., Director of Parks, Public Works and Emergency Management �
Jeff Huynh, Street Systems Engineer �
2010 Asphalt Overlay Project — Project Acceptance
BACKGROUND:
Prior to release of retainage on a Public Works construction project, the City Council must accept the
work as complete to meet State Department of Revenue and State Department of Labor and Industries
requirements. The 2010 Asphalt Overlay Project contract with Miles Resources, LLC dba, Woodworth &
Company, is complete. The final construction contract amount is $1,461,287.61. This is $499,265.59
below the $1,960,553.20 (including contingency) budget that was approved by the City Council on
March 16, 2010.
cc: Project File
CenVal File
K:\LUTC\2010\9-20-10 Asphalt Overlay project - Project Acceptance.doc
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 5, 2010 ITEM #�
_ ........................................................._......................................................................................................................................_..............................................................................................................................................................._................................................................................. ....�
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT ARTS COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS
PoL�cY QuEST�oN: Should the City Council make and appointment to fill the vacancy on the Arts
Commission or re-advertise the vacancy?
COMMITTEE N/A
CATEGORY:
❑ Consent
� City Council Business
�
�
Ordinance
Resolution
ST�'F' REroR'r BY: John Hutton, Recreation Supervisor
MEETING DATE N/A
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
DEPT: PRCS
Background: The Arts Commission is comprised of nine voting members. Commission members are
appointed by the City Council and serve three-year terms.
Current Vacancies: There is one vacancy on the Commission due to a resignation. On September 1,
2010, the City Clerk advertised the vacancy and received one application.
Interviews: The Council interviewed one applicant at a Special Meeting on October 5, 2010.
OPTIONS CONSIDERED:
1. Appoint Martha Arneson to fill the remainder of the unexpired term expiring 12/31/2011.
2. Direct staff to re-advertise the vacancy. ,
-�,-
CITY CLERK APPROVAL N/A I�•I�^ - DIRECTOR APPROVAL N/A
Committee y Council Committee Council
COMMITTEE RECONIlViENDATION: N/A
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I MOVE TO APPOINT MARTHA ARNESON TO THE ARTS COMMISSION TD
FILL THE REMAINDER OF AN UNEXPIRED TERM EXPIRING 12/31/2011. " OR "I MOVE TO DIRECT STAFF TO
RE�4DVERTISE THE VACANCY. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPRO VED COUPiCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION #
COiJNCIL MEETING DATE: October 5, 2010
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
ITEM #: � �
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO THE LODGING TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE
POLICY QUESTION Which candidate should the Council appoint to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee?
COMMITTEE N/A
CATEGORY:
❑ Consent
� City Council Business
❑ Ordinance
❑ Resolution
MEETING DATE N/A
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY: Carol A. McNeill , Ci Clerk DEPT Human Resources/City Clerk
-- ................... .........._._........................._............_..............................................................................................Y_............tY.............................................._._..__......_.._....._......................................._......................................__._._....._..-----.._._..._..............-- ---..._........._........_.._...._.._......_.
_....
Background: The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) is comprised of a minimum of five members who
are appointed by the City Council, and serve two-year terms. Members must be representatives from businesses
required to collect lodging tax or businesses authorized to be funded by lodging t� revenues.
Current Vacancies: Two positions on the LTAC will expire on October 31, 2010, and one vacant position has
an unexpired term of October 31, 2012. On September 13, 2010, the City Clerk's Office published a recruitment
notice to fill the vacancies. Both LTAC Members with expiring terms submitted applications for re-appointment,
and two additional applications were received for the vacant position.
Interviews: Section 20.10 of the City Council Rules of Procedure state the Council will not interview applicants
already serving in the position and may approve re-appointment of citizens wishing additional terms subject to
any limits established by ordinance or other laws without conducting public recruitment or interview. Therefore,
the Council did not interview the two existing Committee members. The Council did interview the two new
applicants at a Special Meeting on October 5, 2010. Individuals appointed to the LTAC on October 5, 2010 will
be invited to the October 19, 2010 City Council Meeting to receive Certificates of Appointment.
Options Considered:
Re-appoint the two members to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee with terms expiring October 31, 2012
and appoint to fill the remainder of the unexpired term through October 31, 2012.
2. Direct staff to re-advertise the vacancy.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: N/A
Committee
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A
•� —�--�-
Q 1,��I1�i+� DIRECTOR APPROVAL N/A N/A
Council Committee Council
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION "I move to reappoint Joann Piquette and Rose Ehl to the Lodging Tax
Advisory Committee with terms expiring October 31, 2012, and appoint to fill the
remainder of the unexpired term through October 31, 2012. "
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1 reading
❑ TABLEDNEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED— 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION #
k:\clerk\agenda bills�2009\l 1-3-09 special & regular meetings\ab -]tac appointment.doc
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: e�..�...._�,e,. �� �n�n ITEM #• �V�- I a�
__....._..._.......__._..........._._............_.__.._........_ ..............................._......_...........................................................__..................._........................._........_OG��.._��..?o_. t_o..........................---.................................._.....................�...................-----._...__.._..__..
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
SUS.TECT: 201�201X Human Services Commission Funding Public Services Recommendations and 2011
CDBG Capital Funding Recommendation.
POLICY QUESTION:
SHOULD THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ACCEPT THE HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION PUBLIC SERVICES FUNDING
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 2011/2012 IN ADDITION TO THE ZO11 CDBG CAPITAL PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS?
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
COMMITTEE Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety
CATEGORY:
❑ Consent
� City Council Business
■
�
Ordinance
Resolution
STAFF REPORT BY: Lynnette Hynden, Human Services Division
Attachments:
MEETING DATE: September 14,
2010
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
DEPT Community Development
Services
• Memorandum to PRHSPS Council Committee Dated September 3, 2010
• E�chibit A: 2010 Human Services Commission Public Services Funding Recommendations and 2011
CDBG Capital Projects Funding Recommendations Spreadsheet for 2011-2012
• Exhibit B: CDBG supporting documentation.
• Exhibit C: Public testimony documents.
Options Considered:
1. Recommend approval of the 2011-12 Human Services Commission Public Services Funding
Recommendations and the 2011 CDBG Capital Projects Funding.
2. Do not recommend approval of the 2011-12 Human Services Commission Funding Recommendations
for either the Public Services Funds or the CDBG Capital Funds.
3. Amend the proposed 2011-12 Human Services Commission Public Services Funding Recommendations
and/or the 2011 CDBG Capital Projects Recommendations.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff �
1
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ,,�����l,�v) //�f/ •la � 1 �'�DIRECTOR APPROVAL: �•�
�i ttee Council Corrunittee Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION I move to forward the proposed Agreement to the September 21 2010 Cdty
Council agenda for approval.
� � ��
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION "I move approvad of the Human Services Commission 2011/12 funding
recommendations, effective January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012 with a total compensation of
$SI1, 607.00 (combining the ongoing General Funds of $430, 000. 00 and CDBG Public Services dollars), and
authorize the City Manager to sign said agreements. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CLTY CLERKS OFFlCE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DEN[ED 1 reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED— 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION #
`
CITY OP �
Federal Way
MEMORANDUM
TO: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee
FROM: Lynnette Hynden, Human Services Division Manager'�2�Y
VIA: Human Services Commission
DATE: September 3, 2010
RE: Human Services General Fund and CDBG Public Services Grant Funding Allocation Process
BACKGROUND
Every two years the Human Services Commission is charged with the overseeing the competitive process of
allocating both the Human Services General Fund dollars as well as the Community Development Block Grant
dollars. The funding process is complete when the commission makes its funding recommendations to City
Council. This process coincides with the City Of Federal Way's budget process which also occurs every two years.
For the 2011 and 2012 budget years the City Of Federal Way Human Services Commission with the support of the
Human Services Division joined in with 17 other cities throughout King County and used a joint electronic
application. The joint electronic application was available to everyone and technical assistance support was also
readily available to all agencies throughout King County. The agency could choose to apply for funding from one
ciry or multiple cities depending on their service areas. After the process had closed in April, 2010 the City Of
Federal Way received 79 applications that totaled over 1 million dollars in requests for program funding to serve
Federal Way residents.
It is anticipated that for the 2011 and 2012 budgets the Human Services General Fund budget line item will remain
the same as this current year. Grants totaling $430,000.00 General Fund and $81,606.00 CDBG are to be awarded
to agencies in 2010 for the 2011 and 2012 budget years. The Human Services Commission preliminary awarded
grants totaling $430,000.00 for Human Services General Fund and $81,607.00 for CDBG Public Services. In
addition the Commission weighed in with two contingency plans one for a 10% increase as well as a 10% decrease
in the General Funds.
The Human Services Commission used four strategies as a guideline for categorizing the grant requests. These
strategies were adopted by the City Council when they approved the Housing and Human Services Consolidated
Plan. Strategy I: Support Basic Human Service Needs through Funding of Emergency Services. Strategy II:
Support Programs that Promote Individual and Community Safety throughout Federal Way. Strategy III:
Comprehensive Human Service Network and Address the Service Needs of Special Needs Populations to Fully
Participate in the Community. Strategy IV: Provide a Suppo�tive Environment & Services for Low-Income Families
with Children.
PROCESS
The Human Services Commission members both alternate and voting members were divided up into smaller task
groups associated with each strategy. A lead was chosen to facilitate the group collectively reviewing their
applications and ranking the applications by scoring each application based on its own merits and information
contained in the application itself. A consensus from the team was not the focus but rather a vigorous discussion on
questions or concerns each member had after reading the application. Outlier scores were asked to be examined
and discussed but members were not asked to bend towards consensus.
The applications were scored based on the same standards regardless of the strategy. The individual scores were
added together and then averaged. Applications were then sorted on the excel spreadsheets from the highest
score to the lowest score. Each strategy had the applications broken down to acceptable applications above the
mid point of the scoring and those below. For the most part the applications were well written but the threshold point
was between 90 and 89 percentile per strategy. It was more highly likely an agency would be funded if it fell above
the 90 percentile than below using the rating tool standard.
The funds were distributed as follows: The line item fund of $430,000 was divided among the four strategies.
Strategy I: 40%; Strategy II: 15%; Strategy III: 30% and Strategy IV 15%. The attached excel spreadsheets will
have a corresponding column that is labeled "Proposed Funding." This dollar amount represents the percentage of
the total funds to be allocated. Contingency Plan 1 is assuming the line item budget is increased by 10%. The
Contingency Plan 2 assumes that the line item would be decreased by 10%.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program dollars are automatically awarded to the same agencies at
the same 2010 budget level. Two agencies will need to continue to have both CDBG and HSGF dollars as in the
past; however, we have submitted a request for a waiver due to hardship and the down turn in the economy. While
we are hopeful that we might achieve a waiver from HUD we cannot confirm and/or assume. Therefore, the mixed
funding is required for the two agencies.
FINALIZING FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS
The attached excel spreadsheets represents the dollar amount assigned to each agency. Funding was also
determined based on factors such as: Agencies ability to demonstrate how their program fits within the City's
Strategies. The internal capacity of the agency and how they can effectively manage the program and the funds is a
sign�cant consideration. The location of the services being provided and access for the Federal Way resident is
essential. While an agency can be located outside of Federal Way their explanation on how they will serve the FW
resident has to be reasonable. Consideration should be given to agencies that are not duplicating services but
collaborating with other like agencies in which to leverage their services, resources and funds. Finally, can the
agency sustain the program and outcomes in the foreseeable future?
It is a very difficult process to read the applications for funding requests and rate their abiliry by their story and then
award funding to an agency when funds aren't flowing generously. However, we are in a situation with todays
economy that more residents need assistance and more agencies need additional revenue sources in which to
sustain their programs. Having over one-million dollars in requests for a budget of $430,000.00 is extremely
difficult. Not all agencies can be funded at a level which balances the grant with the administrative overhead. At
some point a breaking point will occur where the actual dollar of the grant is weakened by the administrative
overhead. As such you will see that with very few exceptions, suggested funding levels are at a minimum of
$5,000.00.
The next step in this process was for the entire Commission to join together and agree to preliminary
recommendations for funding. This occurred in July 2010. The recommendations will then follow a public process
and to begin with agencies were notified of the preliminary suggested award and invited to speak at a public hearing
at which time the Commission can then take into consideration the public's comments and make necessary
changes to their recommendations.
August 30, 2010 a Public Hearing was held and several agency representatives were present and spoke to their
concerns or shared their suppo�t of the Commission's recommendations. There were a slight few changes and the
final funding recommendations are attached.
M��1�=�it�� H��� +� ���t� PU�CfC �ERYIC� �UI�C�1�1� R� �.� �1����"��T� -�`�i"f��i�� j �i' ��u �'� .', :�A`"�x�
Strategy #1 Agenry - Strategy #1 Program 2010 HSGF 2010 CDBG 2011-2012 il 11 D� ont ngenry ont ngenry #�
HSGF Public Service (10961ncreased (1096 Decreased
Basic Needs 40% GF Funding Funding Request pro osal Pro osal Fundin Fundin
**Auburn Youth AYR Street Outreach
Resources Pro ram $0 $0 $5,500 $0 $0 $0 $0
**Catholic REACH OUT Men's
Community Services Homeless Shelter
of Western program
Washin ton $20,000 $0 $20,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0
Catholic Community
Emergency Assistance
Services of Western
Program (EAP)
Washington $p $p $20,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0
Child Care Resources Home�ess Child Care $0 $0 $4,397 $6,500 $0 $0 -$2,500
Christ Community Christ Community
Free Clinic Free Clinic $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Emergency feeding
Program of Seattle & Hunger Relief
Kin Count Program $0 $0 $11,000 $5,000 $0 $0 -$1,000
Emergency Feeding Medically Vulnerable
Program of Seattle &
Kin Count Low-Income Patients $0 $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $2,500 $0
Federal Way Rent Assistance and
Community Emergency Shelter
Care ivin Network $23,500 $0 $28,500 $15,000 $0 $0 -$2,000
Feminist Women's Reproductive health
Health Center-Cedar care for low-income
River Clinics women $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Friends of Youth The Landing Young
� Adult Shelter $0 $0 $918 $0 $0 $0 $0
FUSION Transitional Housing
Pro ram $0 $0 $14,533 $10,000 $0 $0 -$1,000
HealthPoint Healthcare for the
Homeless Pro ram $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $3,000 $0
HealthPoint Dental Pro ram $15,900 $15,399 $31,004 $15,900 $15,399 $0 $0
HealthPoint Medical Pro ram $24,100 $0 $36,790 $10,000 $0 $0 $0
Strategy #1 Agency - Strategy �1 Program - 2010 HSGF 2010 CDBG 2011-2012 11 12 2011 1 G Cont ngency 1 ont ngenry 2
HSGF Pubiic Service (1096 Inc�eased (10% Decreased
Basic Needs 40% GF Funding Funding Request pro al Pro osal Fundin Fundin
HERO House HERO House $0 $0 $623 $0 $0 $0 $0
Hospitality House
Hospitality House Women's Shelter $10,000 $0 $12,500 $0 $0 $7,500
Emergency Shelter
Multi-Service Center and; Transitional
Housin S3s,000 So Sa2,000 $so,000 50 50 -$z,000
Multi-Service Center Food and Clothing
Bank $37,000 $0 $50,000 $28,300 $0 $0 -$2,100
Multi-Service Center Emergency Feeding
Pro ram $0 $10,000 $10,000 CDBG $10,000 $0 $0
Pregnancy Aid of Pregnancy Aid of
South Kin Count South Kin Count $4,000 $0 $4,500 $0 $0 $0 $0
Refugee Women's ReWA Family Support
Alliance Case Management
and Emergency $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $5,000 $0
Seattle-King County South King County
Department of Public Mobile Medical
Health Pro ram $0 $0 $17,414 $10,000 $0 $0 -$1,000
Society of St. Vincent St. Theresa
de Paul of Emergency Human
Seattle Kin Co. Services $18,500 $0 $24,000 $18,500 $0 $0 -$3,500
YWCA Seattle King
Snohomish Emergency Housing $2�000 $0 $3,342 $0 $0 $0 $0
SUBT�i'AL: 193,i100 25 399 s';$369 021 $1?4 $2S 99 $ Ut1Q': < �- 15' 1Q0 .�
on ngency on �ngency
Strategy #2 Agency - Strategy #2 Program 2010 HSGF 2010 CDBG 2011-2012 HSGF Public Service (10% Increased (1096 Decreased
Community Safety 15% GF Funding Funding Request proposal Proposal Funding) Funding)
Child Care Resources Child Care Financial
Assistance $0 $0 $8,490 $0 $0 $0 $0
City of Federal Way Domestic Violence
Perpetrators
Municipal Court Treatment $0 $0 $64,740 $0 $0 $0 $0
Consejo Counseling Consejo Domestic
and Referral Service Violence Program $5,000 $0 $5,975 $0 $0 $0 $0
Crisis Clinic 24-Hour Crisis Line $3,000 $0 $11,420 $3,000 $0 $1,000 $0
2-1-1 Community
Crisis Clinic Information Line $5,000 $0 $29,836 $0 $0 $0 $0
Crisis Clinic Teen Link $3,000 $0 $6,080 $3,000 $0 $0 $0
Domestic Abuse
Women's Network Continuum of
DAWN Housing Services $20,000 $0 $20,000 $10,000 $0 $0 -$500
Domestic Abuse
Women's Network DAWN's Community
DAWN Advocacy Programs $5,000 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 -$1,000
Domestic Abuse -
Women's Network Crisis Line
DAWN $2,000 $0 $5,000 $2,000 $0 $1,000 $0
King County Sexual Comprehensive
Assault Resource Sexual Assault
Center Services $30,000 $0 $31,200 $15,000 $0 $3,000 $0
ReWA Domestic
Refugee Women's
Alliance Violence Program
Advocac Services $0 $0 $12,588 $0 $0 $0 $0
Valley Cities
Counseling and Mental Health
Consultation Sao,000 So Sa2,000 520,000 $o So So
Domestic Violence
VCCC Advocacy Federal
Wa Pro ram $10,000 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
on mgency on ingenry
Strategy #2 Agency - Strategy #2 Program - 2010 HSGF 2010 CDBG 2011-2012 HSGF Public Service (10% Increased (10% Decreased
Community Safety 15% GF Funding Funding Request proposal Proposal Funding) Funding)
Domestic Vio ence
VCCC Advocacy Auburn
Pro ram $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 0
YWCA Seattle King Domestic Violence
Snohomish Services $5,000 $0 $10,400 $0 $0 $6,500 $0
YWCA Seattle King Children's Domestic
Snohomish Violence Pro ram $0 $0 $21,630 $6,500 $0 $0 -$500
` SUBTOTAL: 128 OOQ 304`359 115�00 ; k
on mgency on mgenry
Strategy �3 Agenry - Strategy #3 Program 2010 HSGF 2010 CDBG 2011-2012
Special Needs HSGF Public Service (1096 Increased (1096 Decreased
Po ulation 3096 GF Funding Funding Request proposal Proposal Funding) Funding)
Birth to T ree
Developmental Family Services
Center Program $24,000 $0 $40,000 $22,000 $0 $0 -$4,000
Bridge Disability Certified Professional
Ministries Guardianship
Program. $0 $0 $2,000 0 $0 $0 $0
Catholic Community
Services of Western Volunteer Chore
Washington Services
Ss,000 So S1o,000 Ss,000 So 50 -Sl,000
Peer Mediation and
CRU Institute Cultural Awareness $0 $0 $10,000 0 $0 $0 $0
Dynamic Family Children with Special
Services Needs $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 -$4,000
Eastern European tmmigrant Integration
Counselin Center Pro'ect $0 $0 $6,815 0 $0 $0 $0
Elder and Adult Day qdult Day Health
Services EADS $0 $0 $5,000 0 $0 $0 $0
Federal Way Senior
Center Nutrition Programs $14,000 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $0
Federal Way Senior Adult Day Care
Center $0 $17,983 $19,000 CDBG $17,983 CDBG CDBG
Refugee and;
Jewish Family Service Immigrant Service
Centers $3,000 $0 $6,500 $6,500 $0 $0 -$1,000
King County Bar Community Legal
Foundation Services CLS $0 $0 $7,500 $7,500 $0 $0 -$1,000
MSC General
Multi-Service Center Education Pro ram $10,000 $0 $12,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0
My Service Mind of ESS Program
Northwest $0 $0 $20,000 0 $0 $5,000 $0
My Service Mind of East European Senior
Northwest Services $5,000 $0 $10,000 0 $0 $0 $0
on ngenty on ngency
Strategy #3 Agency - Strategy #3 Program 2010 HSGF 2010 CDBG 2011-2�12
Special Needs HSGF Public Service (10% Increased (10% Decreased
3096 GF Funding Funding Request pro sal Pro sal Fundingj Fundin
Po ulation p° p g�
Navos Employment Services $0 $0 $13,741 $10,000 $0 $0 -$1,500
Training and
Orion Industries Placement Services
TAPS $0 $20,000 $22,242 CDBG $20,000 CDBG CDBG
Senior Services Meals on Wheels $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0
Volunteer
Senior Services Trans ortation $5,000 $0 $10,360 $10,000 $0 $0 $0
South King Council of Capacity Building
Human Services Pro'ect $0 $0 $7,500 0 $0 $0 $0
The Salvation Army
of Kin Count Federal Way Corps $0 $0 $16,910 0 $0 $0 $0
The Salvation Army Seattle White Center
of Kin Count Cor s $0 $0 $5,367 0 $0 $0 $0
Ukrainian Communit Family support
Center of services for Slavic
Washin ton immi rants $0 $0 $17,600 0 $0 $0 $0
Ukrainian Communit Russian/Ukrainian
Center of Refugee Assistance
Washin ton Pro'ect $5,000 $0 $15,000 0 $0 $0 $0
Washington
Women's REACH Plus
Employment &
Education WWEE $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 -$2,000
SUBi'QTAI.: $8t 000 " 37 983 $307 535 $124 37 9�3 -$14,5Q0 ;
Strategy #4 Agency - Strategy #4 Program 2010 HSGF 2010 CDBG 2011-2012 2011/12 2011/2012 CDBG Contingency #1 Contingency #2
Low Income Families 1596 GF Funding Funding Request HSGF Public Service (1096 Increased (10% Decreased
with Children Proposal Proposal Funding) Funding)
Boys & Giris Clubs o Federal Way Safe
Kin Count Zone for Kids $13,000 $0 $25,000 $10,000 $0 $3,000 -$3,000
Center for Children & Safe Havens Visitation
Youth Justice Center $0 $0 $9,000 $5,000 $0 $0 -$1,500
ChangesParent ParentSupportGroup
Su ort Network Network $0 $0 $300 $0 $0 $0 $0
Child Care
Child Care Resources Information and
Referral $0 $0 $8,389 $0 $0 $5,500 $0
Children's Home Early Head Start in
Society of South King and North
Washin ton Kin $10,000 $0 $12,500 $7,000 $0 $0 -$1,500
Communities In
Schools of Federal CIS Resource Program
Wa - Site Coordination $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 -$1,500
Communities In
Schools of Federal CIS Mentoring
Wa Program $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 -$1,500
GriefWorks A
Bereavement Helping the Hurt
Resource $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Institute for Family PACT (Parents and
Develo ment Children To ether $3,000 $18,225 $21,088 $3,000 $18,225 $0 $0
Kent Youth and
Clinical Services
Famil Services $14,000 $0 $15,000 $12,000 $0 $0 -$1,400
Pediatric Interim Car Interim Care of Drug-
Center Inc Exposed Infants $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
VCCC Youth Develo ment $5,000 $0 $12,000 $5,500 $0 $0 -$500
vccc Girls Circle Ss,000 So Sso,000 Ss,000 So $o -Ssoo
� ` �SUBTQTA�.i �. 5Q' t8 ZS 173 77 �. 1�'' ;'-��,�v
� ., �g -�.. �:f� ;�.� � � �� '
� ;_ �
, • ° t3TtYYrXL. °° Z,000 . ,607 ;$1;134' 19�. . �:° . ., �'" 6t� �`.. �# � , r� r� . . �, � ,,' .:�, .'
� �x ; .
t b
�11 COBG CAPITA!'FUMDCNG RECQMM�NDA'i`IONS
Agency Name Project Name 2011 Proposed
CDBG Ca ital
Acquisition of
Emergency Feeding Permananet Facility
Program of SKC for the Emergency $240,179
Feeding Program of
SKC
icroen erprise
Highline Community Development:
College Operations and $69,938
Suppoort
Puget Sound
Revolving Loan Fund
HomeSight (1st Time Homebuyer $�
Loans
Intentional
Federal Way Senior Community and $�
Center Network for Seniors
ICAN
JO7AL'REQUESTED: $310117
CDBG Capital and Public Services Conditions of Funding —"Attachment B"
2011 Capital Proiects
Standard Conditions:
All CDBG projects are subject to the federal environmental review requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as of the date of submittal of application. An
environmental review of Federal Way-awarded CDBG projects must be completed by
King County before contracts will be executed. Costs of the NEPA review will be
charged to the CDBG project if the project is fundable. Projects that do not pass
environmental review, or projects that require an EIS, or have significant issues such as
soil contamination, will not be funded unless approved by both King County and City
staff.
2. All costs of the environmental review shall be the responsibility of the applicant for any
project not funded.
3. All projects must comply with Community Development Block Grant Program
Regulations (24 CFR Part 570) and applicable King County Consortium policies as
outlined in the most recently adopted King County Consortium Consolidated Housing &
Community Development Plan.
4. All CDBG projects shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and City laws including,
without limitation, all City codes, ordinances, resolutions, standards and policies, as now
exist or hereafter adopted or amended including land use and/or building permit
requirements and processes.
5. For all Federal Way CDBG funded Capital Projects, the Agency will directly contract with
the King County Department of Community and Human Services, Housing and
Community Development (HCD) program for implementation unless otherwise notified.
6. Federal Way CDBG Capital Projects must be completed within 17 months from the
beginning of the program year that funds are awarded for.
7. Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as
amended ("URA") and/or Section 104(d) of the Housing and Community Development
Act of 1974, as amended ("Barney Frank AmendmenY') that are triggered by any project
must be included in the budget. Relocation requirements must be coordinated and
verified with King County Housing and Community Development Relocation Specialist.
8. Applicant must receive written notification from King County HCD staff verifying that
environmental review is compfete before any "choice limiting activities" are taken.
Federal Way and King County HCD staff must be notified by the applicant if any
changes are made to the scope of the project since the CDBG application was
submitted.
9. CDBG capital awards over $25,000 are structured as a zero interest forgivable loan for a
set number of years depending on the amount of CDBG funds received and the type of
project. The property owner must be able and willing to secure the change of use
Page 1 of 5
restriction with a promissory note, deed of trust and any other required documents to the
assigned Project Manager of the King County HCD Staff. All security documents related
to funded capital project activities must be submitted prior to the execution of a contract
befinreen the awarded agency and the County in order to incorporate these documents
into the contractual agreement. Failure to execute security documents to the benefit of
King County in a timely manner will result in the cancellation of CDBG awards.
10. No Federal Way CDBG funds shall be expended until all funding sources necessary for
project completion are secured and documentation proving that funding is secured, such
as a preliminary funding letter, is provided to City Staff and King County HCD Staff.
11. No Federal Way CDBG funds shall be expended for acquisition projects until approved
verification that appraised value is equal or greater than final purchase price.
12. No Federal Way CDBG funds shall be expended for acquisition projects until review and
approval of title insurance by City has occurred.
13. City staff may require any additional conditions of funding as appropriate to ensure
compliance with federal, state, county, and City local laws, policies, and procedures, and
if necessary to protect the interests of the City of Federal Way in any agreements.
14. All applicants are required to document compliance with the CDBG national objectives
and shall document compliance using a methodology reviewed and approved by King
County. Agencies using the limited clientele methodology, for example, shall verify that a
minimum of their clients are 51% low-moderate-income per official HUD Income
Guidelines and shall maintain documentation of family size and income, using
methodologies accepted by King County.
15. Agencies shall be responsible for compliance with all applicable federal statutes and
regulations. In the event of a federal finding against any agency receiving City of
Federal Way funds, which requires as its resolution repayment of any and all financial
penalties incurred by King County and/or the City of Federal Way. The agency shall be
wholly responsible for repayment of these expenses on a schedule agreeable to the
payee. This requirement also applies to any failure of the agency to document national
objective compliance in accordance with the federal requirements that results in a
federal finding with financial penalties.
16. Any project that is currently under contract with King County with previously awarded
CDBG funds shall be in compliance with all previous contracts prior to receiving new
CDBG funds or adding additional CDBG funds to an existing contract.
17. Any project that is currently under contract with King County may have the final award
amount adjusted by City staff based upon the amount of CDBG funds remaining in the
project's existing CDBG program, per JRC policies.
18. The applicant shall report all CDBG Program Income. Program Income is to be reported
to the County. Program income shall be returned to the County unless the County
specifies that it may be retained by the Agency. If the County authorizes the Agency to
retain the Program Income to continue or benefit a project(s), the Agency shall comply
with all provisions of this Contract in expending the funds.
Page 2 of 5
Special Conditions:
Emerqencv Feedinq Proqram:
1. All, none, or any portion of the 2011 CDBG funds for this project may be apportioned for
the purpose of supplementing the open 2010 CDBG Emergency Feeding Program
Permanent Faciliry Acquisition project, and/or rehabilitation of a permanent facility once
acquired, as determined by City staff.
2. No funds shall be awarded unless and until a facility to be acquired is approved as
acceptable to King County for this use with acceptable land use and/or conditional land use
permits. The land use and/or conditional land use permits, or any similar permit required for
the proposed use of the property, shall permit the proposed use of the property throughout
the term of the security agreements.
3. $100,000 of the award shall be structured as a forgivable loan (grant). The balance of
the 2011 award for this project shall be structured as a 1% interest-bearing loan, with
quarterly payments. City Staff will work with King County staff to evaluate and determine
appropriate loan terms that take into account the applicanYs financial circumstances.
4. The scope of any rehabilitation activities using CDBG funds shall include all required
ADA accessibility improvements, as acceptable to King County, regardless of the level of
funds awarded through CDBG for the rehabilitation activities.
HiQhline Communitv Collecae:
1. All clients and/or microenterprise businesses participating in classes and other technical
assistance provided with CDBG funds shall complete the required income certification
forms. All clients and/or microenterprise businesses, including all participants of the ESL
classes or other technical assistance funded through this CDBG award, shall be qualified as
low- and moderate- income per King County and HUD requirements, without exception.
2. Federal Way clients and/or microenterprise businesses shall be given priority attendance
to the exclusion of non-Federal beneficiaries in any classes provided. Non-Federal Way
beneficiaries shall participate in classes only if there is additional capacity in the classes
after Federal Way beneficiaries are given preference. No additional expenses shall be
charged to the award for non-Federal Way beneficiaries.
3. The applicant shall provide an Annual Outcomes Report to City staff and to County HCD
staff no later than March 30, 2011. This report shall include 1) a narrative summarizing what
the outcomes of the program are expected to be and how the applicant's program is leading
to or resulting in those outcomes, 2) information on the number of beneficiaries served by
the program that have successfully started a legally operating business, and 3) an
evaluation of the helpfulness of the ESL program in developing a business based on actual
survey results of participants. The applicant shall collect the necessary information required
to complete this report.
4. The applicant's budget for administration and management costs shall not exceed 20%
of the total award, unless waived in writing by City Staff.
Page 3 of 5
2011-2012 Public Service Proiects
Standard Conditions:
1. All CDBG projects are subject to the federal environmental review requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as of the date of submittal of application. An
environmental review of Federal Way-awarded CDBG projects must be completed by
King County before contracts will be executed. Costs of the NEPA review will be
charged to the CDBG project. Projects that do not pass environmental review, or
projects that require an EIS, will not be funded and therefore the cost of the
environmental review will be the responsibility of the applicant.
2. All projects must comply with Community Development Block Grant Program
Regulations (24 CFR Part 570) and applicable King County Consortium policies as
outlined in the most recently adopted King County Consortium Consolidated Housing &
Community Development Plan.
3. All CDBG projects shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and City laws including,
without limitation, all City codes, ordinances, resolutions, standards and policies, as now
exist or hereafter adopted or amended including land use and/or building permit
requirements and processes.
4. If funded, service units and units of service may be adjusted based upon the amount of
funding and refinement of the program service and unit costs definitions. A line item
budget will be negotiated with the subrecipient.
5. Awards are contingent upon successful completion of each agency's previous contracts
with Federal Way, if applicable.
6. Awards will be continued once to the following program year for a second year of
funding subject to availability of funds and agency perFormance in the previous year.
Staff may administratively cease funding agencies that do not meet performance goals
in the first year of funding and not enter into a contract with those agencies for the
second year of funding. The CDBG Contingency Plan will be implemented should
funding increase or decrease for any reason.
7. Agencies receiving CDBG funds for programs that have received funding from the
Human Services General Fund in the past shall receiving funding contingent upon
receiving funding from the Human Services General Fund at that same dollar amount as
they received in previous program years, unless the regulations specifically allow the
CDBG funding without the general fund, or if this requirement is waived by HUD.
8. CDBG Funds awarded shall be used to provide additional units of service above that
provided for the Federal Way Human Services General Fund award, if the General Fund
dollars have been awarded to the program.
9. City staff may require any additional conditions of funding as appropriate to ensure
compliance with federal, state, county, and City local laws, policies, and procedures, and
Page 4 of 5
if necessary to protect the interests of the City of Federal Way in any agreements.
10. All projects are required to document compliance with the CDBG national objectives. All
agencies receiving CDBG funds shall document compliance using the methodology
reviewed and approved by King County. Agencies using the limited clientele
methodology, for example, shall verify that a minimum of their clients are 51 % low-
moderate-income per official HUD Income Guidelines and shall maintain documentation
of family size and income, using methodologies accepted by King County.
Page 5 of 5
Exhibit C: Public Testimony Documents
Public Hearing Held:
August 30, 2010
5:30p.m. - 8:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
Sign In Sheet For Speakers
Strategy #1 Agencies
(See list above this sheet for Strategy #1 agencies)
Human Services Commission
Public Hearing
Human Services General Fund (HSGF) and CDBG Public Service
August 30, 2010
Sign In Sheet For Speakers
Strategy #2 Agencies
(See list above fhis sheet for Strafegy #2 agencies)
Human Services Commission
Public Hearing
Human Services General Fund (HSGF) and CDBG Public Service
August 30, 2010
�
�
�
�
.
`
�
Sign In Sheet For Speakers
Strategy #3 Agencies
(See list above this sheet for Strategy #3 agencies)
Human Services Commission
. Public Hearing
Human Services General Fund (HSGF) and CDBG Public Service
August 30, 2010
'� ,f ���'" '� �,`�.-.��. °���'��, , ���'v��,'�".� �'�e �°�'^.� s�, " a � �F F � ��z . �4 ��' '� '� 5
�"� �, � , �� <_�' �.,,�^Y ,� � > �x �v` ����az � �<��� � � t � s �' € t
. x e «�, � � � �.� . ,'i � �f� ��# ��. �fy �, F �: < ��+' 'S �M y x,i � �, � �; at� t � i
� � � � z aa s�� . � � � �t � � t S
� ,. �'� _ �� °� � �. ��� � a� � � � L� y �� �e � � � � a � ,� � �. � � r�,,� �� p '� �` �� � ,a v
����*� � � ,�. Q, `r%�a� �;� � � � � � � �� `y �,� � ��� ���� ������������a 3
� � � ��n � � ��� � � � � � � �
i. �"� ' t � v«: � ,ss �;'� s .� tr'�"' � � ;l'�� . , ul'p', � � � s� d�, ��`
�� �� y � s ��. '�_ ...�a2 e � �-��¢�- � ���':� �, "'?y�,s���� �d �� „��¢,.P� �, ,�� � R�,� £ • �` ,� yv : "� �
`.`�,..��i,.,, ��. .�.�, , s� � .'�F1»c�.�;£�.' .,� s�`" .��°r��.r���u.�,���€�'.��^�� d.�a. ,.,.��...�_.���.���'���.. ,.�.�,r�:a,�.,. . n .
� �
• �d _ �l � � `� ! � � � �-- V l _Cr:� �
�� / � , � �► ' � .�! �
� � � u
I,: - , i. � •
j /
/•� �� — • � �c����
. �
f' � � � i �� � � L ' ,
.i � � ��
.
.
Sign In Sheet For Speakers
Strategy #4 Agencies
(See lisf above this sheet for Strategy #4 agencies)
Human Services Commission
Public Hearing
Human Services General Fund (HSGF) and CDBG Public Service
August 30, 2010
�
n ; �- Q Q �` .
: �4- �h �! � t �//�.45
�j r ' C`� �C(
V � SA�� zor�t t'D,
�.s�u-nca� �--��
� �5��
�
�� �-��s
, . . � ^ ,
�, :. �►
�
��ti
�� �
�, � c.�� c
CJv� •
� �,vCc �
� �.�, Sc.�t �
Q �� �- -�� �.l
�
GL c.,, � ��b C/' e
/ L. _ 1
�
� utrvcsL � •
C �� n, c f�'v< <J
�0 ssisr��J c
� S
�
Sign In Sheet For Speakers
CDBG Capital Projects Only
Human Services Commission
Public Hearing
August 30, 2010
�..
I Q' X��'�(��it� (�C-�i('�/�� � � '"`�
� G���� �a�%� � � �� �
u
�
COiJNCIL MEETING DATE: October 5, 2010 ITEM #:�
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBTECT: 2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
POLICY QUESTION Should the City approve amendments to the text and Map VI-5 (City Facilities) of
Chapter 6— Capital Facilities; the text and Map VII-2A (Boundaries of Planned Action SEPA) of Chapter 7—
City Center; and Map VIII (Public School Facilities) of Chapter 8— Potential Annexa.tion Area; and three
citizen-initiated requests (Request #1— Lloyd/Valiani Request, Request #2 — Song Request, and Request #3 —
ST Fabrication Request) for chaYtges to the comprehensive plan and zoning map designations?
COMMITTEE: Land Use/Transportation Committee
CATEGORY:
❑ Consent � Ordinance
❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution
1VIEETING DATE: September 20, 2010
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY: Principal Planner Margaret H . Clazk, AICP DEPT: Community Development Services
Background: The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on July 7, 2010, at the close of which they
recommended to the council approval of the staff recommenda.tion shown as s�et�e�t (deletions) and
underline (new) text with further amendments to Chapter 6— Capital Facilities shown as double strike-out
(deletions) and double underline (additions or corrections). The Planning Commission's recommendation is as
follows: 1) approval ofthe staff-recommended changes to the text and Map VI-5 (City Facilities) of Chapter 6—
Capital Facilities with a fiuther recommendation to remove any reference to Camp Kilworth and to address
inconsistencies with the size and cost of the Performing Arts Center (Planning Commission's changes are shown
on Pages 11, 12, 14, and 18 of Exhibit A of the draft Adoption Ordinance); 2) approval of the staff-recommended
changes to the text and Map VII-2A (Boundaries of Planned Action SEPA) of Chapter 7— City Center (Exhibit B
of the draft Adoption Ordinance); 3) approval of the sta.ff-recommended changes to Map VIII (Public School
Facilities) of Chapter 8— Poteirtial Annexa.tion Area (E�chibit C of the draft Adoption Ordinance); 4) approval of
the Lloyd-Valiani Site-Specific Rec�uest (Exhibit D of the draft Adoption Ordinance); 5) approval of the Song
Site-Specific Request (E�stubit E of the draft Adoption Ordinance); and 6) approval of the ST Fabrication Site-
Specific Request (Exlubit F of the draft Adoption Ordinance).
Attachments: 1) Draft Adoption Ordinance with E�chibits A-F; 2) Materials presented to the September 20,
2010 LUTC Meeting; 3) June 29, 2010, Staff Report to the Planning Commission with Exhibits A-G and two
public comments; 4} Draft Minutes of the July 7, 2010, Planning Commission Public Hearing; 5) July 7, 2010,
Comment Letter from the Lakehaven Utility District (received July 8, 2010). (Please note that due to their
be�lk, Attachments 2-5 are not included in the City Council packet, but are available in the City Council
Conference Room as part of a complete packet.}
Options Considered: 1} Adopt the Planning Commission recommended amendments as shown in Exhibits A-F
to the Draft Adoption Ordinance; 2) Adopt the Planning Commission recommended amendments as further
amended by the LUTC; 3) Do not adopt the amendments.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staffrecommends Council approve option #l; adopt the Planning Commission
recommended amendments as shown in Exhibits A-F to the Dra.ft Adoption Ordinance.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: .��r g/. �UV DIItECTOR APPROVAL: �
Commitbee - Council Committce Councd
COhIMITTEE RECO1VIl4iENDATION "I move to forward Option #2 to First ReadinQ October S_ 201 D as amended
to keep Chapter 6 the way it was on the Pe�orm�ing Arts Center,;' � � � �' ��
�i'�— � � -
/
. ��
PROPOSED COUNCII. MOTION(S):
Member
Member
l READING OF ORDINAI�ICE (1�5/2010) "I move to forward the ordinance to a second reading for
enactment on the October 19, 2010, consent agenda. "
2 °fD READING OF ORDINANCE (10/19/2010 "I move approval of the LUTC's recommendation. °
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BYCITYCLERKS OFFICE�
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # �,
❑ DENIED l reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/PIO ACfION Enactment reading
❑ titOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances on1yJ ORDINANCE !#
REVISED — 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION #
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to
amendments to the City's comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan map,
and zoning map. (Amending ordinance no's. 90-43, 95-248, 96-270, 98-330,
00-372, 01-405, 03-442, 04-460, 04-461, 04-462, OS-490, OS-491, OS-492, 07-
558, and 09-614.)
�0
�P
��
�
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act of 1990 as amended (Chapter 36.70A RCW or
"GMA"), requires the City of Federal Way to adopt a comprehensive plan which includes a land use
element (including a land use map), housing element, capital facilities plan element, utilities
element, economic development element, and transportation element (including transportation
system map[s]); and
WHEREAS, the GMA also requires the City of Federal Way to adopt development regulations
implementing its comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted its comprehensive plan with a land use map
(the "Plan") on November 21, 1995, and adopted development regulations and a zoning map
implementing the Plan on July 2,1996; and subsequently amended the comprehensive plan, land use
map, and zoning map on December 23, 1998; September 14, 2000; November 1, 2001; March 27,
2003; July 20, 2004; June 16, 2005; July 16, 2007, and June 11, 2009; and
WHEREAS, the City may consider Plan and development regulation amendments pursuant to
Process VI, under Title 19 (Zoning and Development Code) of the Federal Way Revised Code
(FWRC), chapter 19.80 FWRC, pursuant to chapter 19.35 FWRC; and
WHEREAS, under RCW 36.70A.130, the Plan and development regulations are subject to
continuing review and evaluation, but the Plan may be amended no more than one time per year; and
WHEREAS, the Council has considered amendments to the text and maps of the comprehensive
plan, the comprehensive plan map, and the zoning map, specifically, the text and Map VI-5 (City
K: IComprehensive PIan12010 Comprehensive Plan UpdatelLUTCIRecommendationlLaw Comp Plan Amend Ordinance.doc
Ordinance No. 10- Page 1 of S
Rev 1/10 CP
Facilities) of Chapter 6— Capital Facilities; the text and Map VII-2A (Boundaries of Planned Action
SEPA) of Chapter 7— City Center; and Map VIII (Public School Facilities) of Chapter 8— Potential
Annexation Area; and three citizen-initiated requests (Request # 1— Lloyd/Valiani Request, Request
#2 — Song Request, and Request #3 —ST Fabrication Request) for changes to the comprehensive plan
and zoning map designations;
WHEREAS, on June 19, 2010, the City's SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance on the 2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendments; and
WHEREAS, the City's Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 7, 2010, at the close
of which they recommended to the Council approval of the following amendments: 1) amendments
to the text and Map VI-5 (City Facilities) of Chapter 6— Capital Facilities; the text and Map VII-2A
(Boundaries of Planned Action SEPA) of Chapter 7— City Center; and Map VIII (Public School
Facilities) of Chapter 8— Potential Annexation Area, and 2) approval of the three citizen-initiated
requests (Request #1 — Lloyd/Valiani Request, Request #2 — Song Request, and Request #3 —ST
Fabrication Request) for changes to the comprehensive plan and zoning map designations; and
WHEREAS, the Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) of the Federal Way City Council
considered the comprehensive plan amendments on September 20, 2010, following which it
recommended approval of the Planning Commission's recommendations as amended by the LUTC
to not include changes related to the Performing Arts Center and Multipurpose Competitive Sports
Center in Chapter 6, Capital Facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, through its staff, Planning Commission, and City Council
committee, received, discussed, and considered the testimony, written comments, and material from
the public, and considered the matter at its City Council meetings on October 5, 2010, and October
19, 2010; and
K: IComprehensive PIan12010 Comprehensive Plan UpdatelLIITCIRecommendationlLaw Comp Plan Amend Ordinance.doc
Ordinance No. 10- Page 2 of S
Rev 1/10 CP
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to approve the: 1) amendments to the text and maps of the
comprehensive plan; and 2) three citizen-initiated requests for changes to the comprehensive plan
and zoning map designations;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findin�s and Conclusions.
(a) The proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan maps and comprehensive plan text, as
set forth in Exhibits A-F, attached hereto, are consistent with the Council vision for the City of
Federal Way; will allow development which is compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods,
including adjacent single-family uses; provide convenient goods and services at a pedestrian and
neighborhood scale close to adjacent residential uses; provide for capital facilities and private
utilities to serve both present and projected population; and therefore bear a substantial relationship
to public health, safety, and welfare; are in the best interest of the residents of the City; and are
consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A, the King County Countywide Planning Policies,
and the un-amended portion of the Plan.
(b) The proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan maps and comprehensive plan text, as
set forth in Exhibits A-F, attached hereto, are compatible with adjacent land uses and will not
negatively affect open space, streams, lakes, or wetlands, or the physical environment in general. The
amendments will allow for growth and development consistent with the Plan's overall vision and
with the Plan's land use element household and job targets, and will allow reasonable use ofproperty
subject to constraints necessary to protect environmentally sensitive areas. The amendments,
therefore, bear a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; are in the best interest
of the residents of the City; and are consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A, the King
K: IComprehensive P1an12010 Comprehensive Plan UpdatelLUTCIRecommendationlLaw Comp Plan Amend Ordinance.doc
Ordinance No. 10- Page 3 of 5
Rev 1/10 CP
County Countywide Planning Policies, and the un-amended portion of the Plan.
(c) The proposed amendments to the zoning map, set forth in Exhibits D, E, and F attached
hereto, are consistent with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan and the
comprehensive plan land use map proposed to be amended in Section 2 below, bear a substantial
relation to public health, safety, and welfare, and are in the best interest of the public and the
residents of the City.
(d) 'The proposed amendments have complied with the appropriate process under state law and
the FWRC.
Section 2 Com,prehensive Plan Com�rehensive Plan Maps and Zonin� Maa Amendments
Adoption. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter amended in 1998, 2000,
2001, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2007 and 2009, copies of which are on file with the Office of the City
Clerk, the comprehensive plan map, and the zoning map are amended as set forth in Exhibits A-F
attached hereto.
Section 3. Amendment Authoritv. The adoption of plan and map amendments in Section 2
above is pursuant to the authority granted by Chapters 36.70A and 35A.63 RCW, and pursuant to
chapter 19.80 FWRC.
Section 4. Severabilitv. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable.
The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance,
or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity
of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 5. Savin�s Clause. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter
amended in 1998, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2007, and 2009 shall remain in full force and effect
until these amendments become operative upon the effective date of this ordinance.
K: IComprehensive P1an12010 Comprehensive Plan UpdatelLUTCIRecommendationlLaw Comp Plan Amend Ordinance.doc
Ordinance No. 10- Page 4 of S
Rev 1/10 CP
Section 6. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of
this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days after
passage and publication, as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this 19th day of October, 2010.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, L1NDA KOCHMAR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, CAROL MCNEILLY, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COLJNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.:
K: IComprehensive PIan12010 Comprehensive Plan UpdatelLUTCIRecommettdationlLaw Comp Plan Amend Ordinance.doc
Ordinance No. 10- Page 5 of 5
Rev 1/10 CP
Exhibit A
Proposed Amendments to
Chapter 6, Capital Facilities
(only those pages with proposed amended
language have been included)
FWCP — Chapter Six, Capital FaciliGes
CHAPTER SIX - CAPITAL FACILITIES
6.0 INTRODUCTION
The City of Federal Way is expected to add 6,188 housing units and 7,481 jobs between
the years 2001 and 2022. This growth witl stimulate the local economy and maintain a
diverse and vibrant community. ,� It will also generate a corresponding
demand for new public services and facilities, such as schools, parks, and streets. These
new facilities, and the financial implications they will have for Federal Way and its
citizens, are the subject of this chapter.
The Growth Management Act
The Growth Management Act (GMA) refers to capital facilities planning in two of the 13
statewide planning goals. The two relevant goals are:
Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate
public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner.
2. Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services
necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at
the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing
current service levels below locally established minimum standards.
More specifically, the GMA mandates that the City prepare a capital facilities plan which
contains the following components:
• An inventory of existing facilities owned by public entities, showing the
locations and capacities of the facilities.
• A forecast of the future needs for such facilities.
• The proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new facilities.
• At least a six-year financing plan that wil( finance such facilities and clearly
identify sources of public money for such purposes.
• A requirement to reassess the Land Use chapter if probable funding falls short.
Revised , , , 2010. CommuniN Facilities VI-1
FWCP — Chapter Six, Capital Facili6es
In the pages that follow, this chapter complies with the GMA requirements for a capital
facilities plan.
Funding/Financing
Typically, cities and the residents they service would like to have higher LOS standards
than they can afford. Federal Way has worked hard to provide the highest LOS possible
without raising ta�ces. It is a difficult balance to maintain and the City is currently et-�
explorin� options to pay
for capital facilities and the associated maintenance and operations costs.
If the City decides to generate additional revenues, there are several sources available.
Some of these revenues are "on-going" in the sense that the City levies the tax and the
revenues are added to the City's general fund on an annual basis. On-going revenues
include property taxes, sales taxes, utility t�es, impact fees, and business and occupation
taxes. The other category of funds is called "one time" funds because the City cannot
count on having these funds available on an annual basis. These funds include bond sales
and grants such as, TEA-21, IAC, and Urban Arterial Fund money. On-going funds can
be used for either capital facilities or maintenance and operations. However, it is prudent
financial management and adopted City policy that one-time funds be used only for
capital improvements. As is discussed later in this chapter, the City proposed two bond
issues to finance capital facilities in the Fall of 1995. As part of that bond issue, voters
�ve�e-�s�e�e approved a permanent utility tax to pay for the maintenance and operations
costs associated with the new capital facilities.
...............................................................
6.3 PARKS AND RECREATION
Inventory of Existing Facilities
The City of Federal Way adopted the first Park, Recreation, and Open Space
Comprehensive Plan in December of 1991. The City updated the Plan in 1995, 2000, and
2006. This plan, which is now called the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan, is
incorparated by reference. The planning area of the 2000 and 2006 Parks Plans are based
only on the City limits of Federal Way, although the Potential Annexation Area (PAA) is
inventoried and discussed. As in previous plans, the Parks Plan has been subdivided into
subareas, referred to as Parks Plan Planning Areas (Map VI-3), for purposes of long-
range planning.
The 2006 Parks Plan updates the inventory to include new parks and properties added to
the City's system. In addition to City-owned parks and open space, the Parks Plan also
lists school district, state, and county facilities, as well as private recreation facilities.
Revised , , , 2010, CommuniN FaciliGes VI-2
FWCP - Chapter Six, Capital Facilities
Map VI-4 depicts the location of major parks and open space within the Federal Way
planning area. Table VI-2 summarizes this inventory as of June 2006.
Table VI-2
Summarv of Existin� Citv Park-and Recreation Areas
DEVELOPED PARK LAND CATEGORIES � ACRES
14 Nei hbofiood Parks 156.4
5 Communi Pazks 2223
0 Re ional Pazks 0.0
4.2 mi Trails Acrea e 118.0
4 Park Facilities Acreaee 25.8
Total Undevelo ed Park Land 543.5
Total Park Land in Federal Way 1066.0
When the City incorporated in 1990, there were approximately eight acres of parkland
available per 1,000 population in Federal Way. Since that time, the City has purchased
additional property and developed new facilities. These include the Lake Killarney Open
Space Park, Heritage Woods Neighborhood Park, Wedgewood Neighborhood Park, BPA
Trail I, II, and III, Madrona Park, Cedar Grove Park, Klahanee Lake Community Senior
Center, Dumas Bay Centre, Celebration Park, Steel Lake Annex facilities, and the
Community Center, which opened March 2007. In 2004, Washington State Parks
transferred West Hylebos Wetlands Park to the City. King County has also transferred
several properties to the City in the last six years. These parks and facilities are described
in greater detail in the Parks Plan.
As of 2006, the City is providing 10.9 acres of park land per 1,000 population. The City's
goal is to maintain a level of service of 10.9 as Federal Way grows in population and
size. In the past, the City has obtained land through plat dedication. The City is also now
considering a Park Impact Fee to provide funds for parks acquisition and development.
In addition to acquiring and developing new facilities, the City has taken administrative
actions to take advantage of other available public recreational facilities. The City
enacted interlocal agreements with the School District to jointly operate and maintain
school recreational facilities. As a result, the City jointly operates and maintains a major
community park in conjunction with Saghalie Middle School. Also, the City has
agreements to provide recreational programs and schedule play fields at several
elementary schools, in addition to middle schools. These facilities are now formally
available nights and weekends, year around for use by local residents.
As referenced above, City residents now have access to 10.9 acres of parks and open
space per 1,000 population. This inventory includes City owned parks and open space
within the City limits. The City currently provides 1066 acres of parkland, which the City
maintains and operates. Of the total 1066 acres, 522.5 acres is developed for recreational
use areas and 543.5 acres is undeveloped.
Note: Washington State Parks has a regional park facility within the City limits, which
Revised , , , 2010. CommuniN FaciliGes VI-3
FWCP - Chapter Six, Capital Facilities
residents often use. Dash Point State Park is 230 acres of state land, which provides a
regional (statewide) recreation use for camping, swimming, picnicking, walking trails,
and beachfront. The state park land is not included in the City's LOS simply because the
state owns, operates, and maintains this facility. For the purposes of parks planning, the
recommended LOS standard in the City's Parks Plan and this Capital Facilities chapter is
10.9 acres of City owned parkland per 1,000 population.
Forecast of Future Needs
The 2006 Parks Plan states that the inventory of public park and open space land will be
adequate to serve both the current and future projected population within the City and
PAA. However, much of this acreage is un-programmed, undeveloped open space. The
primary deficiency, both now and projected, is in improved trails.
The updated Parks Plan makes recommendations based on five Core Values identified
through an extensive planning process. Four of these relate to capital facilities and include:
Core Value # L• Improve Existing Facilities and Provide Multiple Functions in Parks
Core Value #2: Develop a Walking and Biking Community T'hrough an Integrated
Trail and Sidewalk Network
Core Value #3: Retain and Improve Our Open Spaces
Core Value #4: Create Community Gathering Place and Destinations
Capital facilities that respond to these Core Values have been incorporated into the Six-
Year CIP. Some of the major efforts planned for this six year period include:
• Design and redevelopment of Lakota and Sacajawea Parks
ae�ss
• Introduction of community gathering spaces in neighborhood parks
• Site and building assessments for Dumas Bay Centre
• Trail and Pedestrian improvements
• Upgrade Saghalie Park soccer field to artificial turf
In addition, the City completed a cultural arts survey in 1994. The survey evaluated
several alternatives for a performing arts center and concluded that at some time in the
near future, the City would need such a facility with a capacity of about 1,000 seats. The
City has converted a portion of Dumas Bay Centre into the Knutzen Family Theatre, a
250-seat civic theater facility. This facility will begin to fulfill the identified community
need for a performing arts center.
Locations 8� Capacities of Future Facilities
Map VI-4 indicates the location of the parks, recreation facilities, and open space subareas
the City will need to maintain the adopted LOS. The Parks Plan breaks the planning area
Revised , , , 2010. Communilv FaciliGes VI-4
FWCP - Chapter Six, Capital Facilities
into subareas and addresses future facilities at the subarea level. For more details about the
type, size, and cost of these new facilities, please refer to the 2006 Parks Plan. Map VI-4A
shows potential locations of public spaces in the City Center.
Finance Plan
Table VI-3 (Parks Six-Year Capital Improvements Plan, 200Cr2012) describes the
proposed parks projects that will be needed between now and the year 2012, together
with cost estimates programmed by year. Table VI-3 also identifies the revenues that will
be available during the same time period to finance these new facilities. Please refer to
Chapter 7, "Implementation," of the 2006 City of Federal Way Parks, Recreation, and
Open Space Plan for information on the finance plan.
The City biennially updates its Parks & Recreation Capital Improvement Plan. These
updates reflect new project priorities, eliminate projects that have been completed, and
add new projects to the program.
Table VI-3
Parlcs Six-Year Capital Improvements Plan, 2007 2012
(in thousands)
Sources/Uses 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Real Estate Excise Taac 1,007 344 460 510 507 421 3249
Misc. Transfers 21 21
Grants/Anticipated 8�9 500 1,000 3�1�8
� 1S2 �Q
Grants/Contributions Received
Miti ation Funds Received 110 I 10
General Fund �
Total Financing Sources � 344 460 1010 507 1421 �
Park Pro'ects
Pla round 134 134 136 136 137 138 S15
BMX/Bike Facili 15 15
�-358 �;�1A9 S98 ��
Communi Gatherin S xes 30 37 108 112 112 126 525
Downtown Public S ace 100 100
Dumas Ba Centre: Buildin 33 193 140 140 140 140 786
Dumas Ba Centre: Site Restoc 137
Lakota Pazk Desi n& Redev. 723 11,000 11,723
Ma or Maintenance - Park Facil. 110 110 110 110 110 110 660
Panther Lake O en S ce 24 68 92
Pove Ba Master Plan 41 41
Sa halie Pk Soccer Fld- Artif Turf 920 920
Trail & Ped Access [m 'ts 40 130 78 65 67 70 450
West H lebos Boazdwalk 1,365 1,365
Subtotal (G) 4�18i �A4 3�66 11,672 581 584 �
2,732 5R4
[In ndedEndin Balance 0 0 (877) (10,669) (988) (7,582) (20,116)
Revised , , , 2010, Communilv Facili6es VI-5
FWCP — Chapter Six, Capital Facilities
6.4 Community Facilities
Significant community investments have been made in the last 10 years to implement the
community's vision for Federal Way. In addition to the investments in the surface water,
transportation, and parks areas, the City also acquired and improved a basic set of
community facilities to house City operations and provide space for community
gatherings and recreation.
The City acquired n' "� °�� �~°~�.,~;`�.�ce�:,.,. r��+v,. trrr rr� �a Dumas Bay
�... �_ �..,,, .. �
Centre (a conference and retreat facility) in 1993. Strong local support in community
recreation and arts activities translated into the City Council's adoption of a 2% For the
Arts ordinance to provide funding for arts in public places in 1994, and the construction
of the 254-seat Knutzen Family Theatre in 1998. �ke--�ev� City Hall, which consolidates
most City administrative offices, ��is�a€et� Police, and the Municipal Court in one
facility, was acquired in 2003. ^' �nn� rr;�,. r�,,.,,�. a:.,o�+oa ;+�o�����.,.�w..,..:+..
,
i �«�.. � a •+i, i ��n ��....,,,..a rri.�..�+ c.,.,a� •rt, r;ti, ., ea +�,o
� .�) ...,.,w....... �....
The City began construction of a new 72,000 square foot Community Center in fa112005.
Construction was completed in early 2007. The facility houses Recreation and Cultural
Services staff, and includes athletic and community facilities suitable for a wide variety
of events and programs. • �E
�
�
Inventory of Existing Facilities
As of January 2007, the City owns or occupies a number of facilities, as shown in Table
VI-4 and Map VI-S.
Projected Community Needs
The City has identified a number of facilities to help deliver services more ef�iciently and
adjust to the changing demographics of this community in the future. These projected
needs are beyond the City's ability to fund within the six-year planning horizon.
However, in order to keep the community's vision alive, we purposely did not exclude
any of these community projects. The City Council will periodically review and prioritize
these projects and provide funding when available. A description of these facilities with a
summary list is provided in Table VI-S.
Revised , , , 2010 Communitv Facilities VI-6
FWCP — Chapter Six, Capital Facili6es
Table VI-4
Summary of Existing Community Facilities
BuildingName �Sed Use Sq.ft/Occupancy
City Hall Own City operations not otherwise listed 88,085/approximately 300 FTE and
Council Chamber
Police Evidence
�,et�te�e�
Federal Way Community
Center
Steel Lake Annex
Steel Lake Maintenance
Shop
Dumas Bay Center
(DBC)
Knutzen Family Theater
(at DBC)
Miscellaneous Outdoor
Storage
Own Police evidence room
�eased
e��s
bease� �ee�
Own Community recreation center with
gym, pools, senior lounge, pre-school,
and educational classrooms and
multipurpose room with kitchen.
Recreation staff offices.
Own
Own
Own
Own
Daycare, arts and crafts programs
Maintenance operations, outdoor
equipment and material storage
Public park, meeting/banquet/
overnight lodging
254 seats performing arts theatre and
rehearsal hall
6,000/2 FTE
11,200/13 FTE, gym, kitchen, etc.
72,000/13 regular FTE and
approximately 20 part-time temporary
personnel
Opened in 2007
1,161/program only
4,110 office and maintenance bay/32
FTE
approximately 90 sq 8 storage yazd
and approximately additional 1.5 acres
available for future expansion
6 meeting rooms, 70 overnight rooms,
12 acre park ground
Leased Street maintenance material and park 10,000 material storage
equipment storage 2,000 equipment storage
Miscellaneous Indoor Leased Spare office equipment/facility 260 sf. ft.
Storage parts/records 2,160 cubic ft boxes stored offsite in a
document storage facility
Table VI-S
Projected Community Facility Needs
2007 — 2013
Type of Facility Z.e�. Size Cost
(st) (millions)
L Indoor Competitive Sports Facility 2015 75,000 $10 —$12
2. Performing Arts Centre
3. Maintenance Facility
4. Public Parking Facilities
2015 50,000 $35 — $40
2009 120,000 yard $1.0
6,500 office
2010 200 — 400 stalls $5 to $10
TOTAL $ 51 — $63
Revised , , , 2010. Communitv Faciiities VI-7
FWCP — Chapter Six, Capital Facilities
Municipal Facility (General Government Police, and Court Operations)
The City acquired the current City Hall in 2003 and consolidated its police, court, and
general governmental operations under one roo£ About 10 percent or 8,000 of the total
88,500 square feet of space in this building is currently available for future expansions. In
addition to the City Hall parcel, the City also acquired two vacant lots to the north which
is the location of the Police Evidence facility and overflow parking for the City Hall/
Municipal Court.
TL. !�'+. !` '1 ',7 ..+:,,.. �l.o .,+;.,,, L.�11.�+.., o *,. .. D,.�o«�:..1
0 0 o e �
n �• n * ��, c ii ��nn� r�,.......�..oa :+. „ta .,aa ., o��;...,.�oa �n i c�
, .,, ..,.,
�
;..�:.,,..�. .��e.......,.o F ,.:t:+.. � ,a;�,.,,��o.i L,vlo���
o ��
Pursuant to an interlocal agreement, the Cities of Auburn, Burien, Des Moines, Federal
Wav Renton SeaTac and Tukwila Washin�ton have a re�ed to jointly develop
construct maintain and operate a consolidated correctional facilitv to be located in Des
Moines Washin on to provide correctional services essential to the�reservation of the
public health safetY and welfare serve for these cities. As part of this agreement, an
autonomous public a e�ncy was formed the South Correction Entity (SCORE) with
representation from the cities of Auburn Burien, Des Moines, Federal Wav, Renton,
SeaTac and Tukwila Collectivelv the cities represent almost 340 000 citizens in South
King Countv.
As a result of the shortage of iail beds King notified the cities in 2000 that thev
would no longer be able to house misdemeanant inmates after 2012. Many cities have
contracted with other jail facilities in Eastern WashinQton to house inmates as an interim
measure However these contracts expire even sooner in 2010. While these contracts have
provided short term relief for the jail crisis thev are not a long-term solution and additional
capacity must be built For example the SCORE cities are currentlXusin� a_pproximately
350 jail beds everv dav. However the Renton and Auburn jails can only house 100
inmates leavin� a need for an additiona1250 beds. This is the current deficienc As the
population in the re ig o�pands the shorta_�jail beds will become even re�r.
All of the Kin� C� cities �articipated in a lon -t� jail needs studv in 2006. This
study is known as the Ricci-Greene Stud� The stud�su��ested that two sub-re ig onal
jails be constructed. The studv revealed that 1 440 beds would be needed bv all the cities
by 2026. Of the 1 440 beds 700 of them are needed in South King County. After the
Ricci-Greene Studv was completed the SCORE cities com�leted a se�arate feasibilitv
studv to determine if the cities could provide ec�uivalent jail services at a reduced cost.
The feasibili studv revealed that SCORE could provide the same services at a reduced
rate, benefiting the tax pavers of the SCORE citizens.
The $80 5 million facilitv will be a sin l�e-story buildin� with a housin��mezzanine
constructed on a sited owned by SCORE located in Des Moines, Washington. The facilitv
Revised , , , 2010. Communitv Facilities VI-8
FWCP — Chapter Six, Capital Facili6es
will be ap�roximatelv I37 000 square feet with associated parkin� and site improvements
on a 15 613-acre collection of parcels The site is near Des Moines Creek Park where
South 208` Street intersects with 18` Avenue South. The facili is designed to house up
to 822 inmates. There will be ap�roximately 120 emplovees at the facility. The maioritv of
those will be corrections officers followed bv medical staff and administrative personnel.
Ownership and the financial commitment to SCORE are �rorated based on the ci �'s
2007 average daily vrisoner population—for Federal Wav that is 69 operational beds or
18 percent of the�roject.
Maintenance Facility
The Parks and Public Works maintenance facility is located at 31132 28`" Avenue South.
The entire site is approximately 1.4 acres, with 1,060 square feet of office space and a
61,000 square foot fenced storage yard. The City acyuired two adjacent parcels, for a
total of 2.25 acres, to the north of the facility in 2003. Today, the maintenance facility
contains around 3,500 square feet of office space and 90,000 in fenced starage space,
with an additional 1.5 acres of land area available for future expansions.
Parks Maintenance operates seven days a week, two shifts per day. The space needed for
the maintenance operations includes a front counter/reception area, crew quarters
(including an area for daily time cards, breaks, and crew meetings/training, etc.), as well
as a locker room. Public Works streets and surface water maintenance operations have
similar needs for office space; operating Monday through Friday, year round, one shift
per day. Both Parks and Public Works maintenance operations tend to intensify during
the summer months and require up to 15 part-time, seasonal workers at any given time.
��� .��
� ��� , ���
,:+� +i.o e,..,+i. � i �� n .. a r c n,.,.o�� v,..,.., n,ta;r;,,,, a.• e„+ :+ :
�
�� � ���
�
Revised , , , 2010. Communiiv FaciliGes VI-9
FWCP — Chapter Six, Capital Facilities
Conference/Performing Arts Center
In 1994, the City of Federal Way, through the Arts Commission, asked AMS Planning
and Research to conduct a feasibility study of a cultural arts facility to serve the City.
Under the guidance of a 27-member steering committee, AMS conducted a survey of
local arts organizations, analysis of existing cultural and meeting facilities, market
research with residents of the City and surrounding communities, interviews with key
community leaders representing government and business, and meetings and workshops
with the steering committee, all of whom provided base information. The study
recommended a performing arts center to seat 1,000 patrons and a visual arts gallery.
The performing arts center proposed in this study included design criteria that
incorporated multi-level seating to accommodate as many as 500 — 600 people on an
orchestra level, while still achieving intimacy for audiences.
The construction cost for a performing arts theater was estimated in the 1994 report to be
between $190 —$240 per square foot. Adjusted to 2007, the per square foot cost can
easily be $400 —$500, or $25 to $30 million for construction. Site requirements called for
a minimum of five acres; two acres for the facility and three acres to provide for surface
parking and to meet additional code requirements. Alternatively, two to two and a half
acres would be needed if structured parking is used. The additional cost for structured
parking would be $5 to $8 million. Based on these assumptions, the full developmental
cost is expected to be $35 to $40 million.
Maintenance and operation costs for a facility of this size were estimated to be $750,000 per
year. Projected revenues (using a 171 event day schedule) was $390,000, leaving a net
operating cost of $360,000 to be generated through fundraising or an operating endowment.
Conference/Performing Arts Facility Recommendation
• 50,000 square foot facility
• Two-acre site
• $35 — $40 million
Multipurpose Competitive Sports Center
The City of Federal Way enacted a�-% one percent lodging tax and formed the Lodging
Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) in 1999 to promote and enhance the local tourism
industry. The committee has commissioned a feasibility study for an indoor competitive
sports facility that will increase visitors' stay in local hotels and complement the Aquatic
Center and Celebration Park, two other regionaUnational amateur sports facilities in the
City.
A number of development concepts have been considered, one of which is a facility for
basketball and volleyball tournaments with an athletic club for training/conditioning to
generate on-going usage and revenue. One of the considerations for such a facility would
Revised , , , 2010. Communitv FaciliGes VI-10
FWCP - Chapter Six, Capital Facilities
be its ability to be financially self-sustaining. It would also ideally be developed and
operated by the private sector, with minimum or no public participation.
Conference/Performing Arts Facility Recommendation
• 75,000 square foot facility
• Five-acre site
•$10 —$12 million development and construction only, to be funded by private
developer
Public Parking Facility
The existing city center development is currently near or at capacity with the required
surface parking to business-space ratio. To intensify the development, such as the multi-
story mixed-use developments envisioned by the community, additional parking space
will be needed. These additional parking spaces would most likely be achieved through
structured parking, consistent with the multi-story mixed-use business space.
These structured parking facilities are likely needed in order for each of the super-blocks
to regain grounds for redevelopment. With the construction cost of structured parking at a
premium when compared to land cost, some public/private partnership would likely be
needed for them to be financially feasible. The partnership may be in various forms, but
the essence is consistent that public funds are invested to secure certain amount of
parking spaces in an otherwise private-business parking facility.
Public Parking Facility Recommendation
200 to 400 designated public parking spaces in conjunction with privately developed
parking structures for redevelopment projects located within the City Center.
Between $5 —$10 million total. Investments will vary depending on the need and
type of redevelopment projects at each location. City funding sources would be a
combination of the City's economic development incentive fund and other state and
federal economic development, and/or infrastructure funding sources.
Financing Plan
It is desirable to have all theses facilities in the community as soon as possible. However,
unless they are funded with private or voter-approved funding sources, the City's projected
revenues will not support either the development or the required operating and on-going
maintenance of these facilities.
TL. � F r F 'I'� .,�.. :� I:l.ol., r„ L.o �„� e.l .,:�1.
Future facility additions would depend on future voter approval to raise additional capital
and maintenance funds.
Revised , , , 2010. CommuniN Facilities VI-11
FWCP - Chapter Six, Capital Facili5es
The City updates its capital improvements program every other year in conjunction with
its biennial budget process. These updates will reflect new project priorities and funding
availability.
Revised , , , 2010, Communilv Facilities VI-12
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan
City Facilities
Capital Facilities Element
�
Legend:
Q Federal Way City Limits
�_ i Potential Annexation Area
City-Owned Facilities
o City Hall
Q Dumas Bay Centre
Q New Community Center
O Steel Lake Annex
City-Leased Facilities
Q Klahanee Lake Center
0 Police Substation - The Commons
Q Police Substation - North Center
� Police Substation - Westway
� Scale:
0 0.5 1
N Miles
Map Revised�. Octote��. 2006. Source: City of Federal Way. Kiny Counry
;; � Federal Way MAP VI-5
Note: This map is intended for use as a yraphical represen�ation only.
The City o( Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy.
REPLACED BY MAP DATED JUNE 2010 - SEE NEXT PAGE
City of Federal Way
�ompreh�nsive Rlan
City Facilities
� caplta� Facil�ties Eremenr
Legend:
� Federal Way Cily Limits
�_ J Potential Annexatio� Are3
City-�wned Facilfies
� City Hall
� Dumas Bay Centre
� Federal Way Cammunity Certter
� Steel Lake Mnex
Q Police SubstaRion - The Commor3s
� Police Substation - Wescway
� Scale:
D 0.5 1
hl Miles
liqhv..e ara m�a suv cl�dr.d�rwq,KMqca.�yr
41�
Federal Wa�r MAP VI-5
Mo�: Thls mnP K YCer,deD iQ usr as a�tYml repezeYdla� anh.
The C[y of Fetleral Yiay mates no wersanry es Eo Ils aoaraq-
REVISED MAP - REPLACES MAP DATED OCTOBER 2006
Exhibit B
Proposed Amendments to
Chapter 7, City Center
In Apri12010 the Citv Center Planned Action Area was expanded to add approximatelv ten acres
Infrastructure
Most of the existing facilities and infrastructure were inherited from King County. In 1998, the
City adopted new streetscape guidelines related to roadway profiles, streetlights, sidewalk widths,
and street trees. In 1999, South 312`�' Street between Pacific Highway South and 23` Avenue
South was widened to five lanes, and new sidewalks, street lighting, and street trees were added,
as well as traffic signals at 20�' Avenue South and 23` Avenue South. In 2001, South 320�' Street
was improved with streetscape elements between 1 l�' Place South and 30`�' Avenue South. In
2002, the remainder of South 320�' Street also was improved and 23` Avenue South was widened
to five lanes with sidewalks and streetscape elements. New traffic signals at South 316�', South
317�`, and South 322 Streets were installed.
Pacific Highway HOV Lanes, Phase I constructed in 2002-2004, widened Pacific Highway South
with an HOV lane in each direction from South 312�' to South 324�'. The project also added
sidewalks, center medians, landscaping, and utility undergrounding. This project was the City's
first of five to improve the Pacific Highway/International Boulevard corridor and was a
continuation of the revitalization of the City Center.
7.2 VISION STATEMENT
By the end of the comprehensive planning horizon, the Federal Way City Center will have
evolved into the cultural, social, and economic center of the City and fulfilled its role as one of
Puget Sound's regional network of urban centers. This role will be reinforced by pedestrian-
oriented streetscapes; an efficient multi-modal transportation system; livable and affordable
housing; increased retail, service, and off'ice development in a compact area; a network of public
spaces and parks; superior urban design; and a safe, essential, and vibrant street life.
The City Center is responsive to the needs of the City's residents. In addition to general services
that draw people from outside the region, such as retail, office, and hotel uses, the City Center is
the primary commercial area providing local goods and services to the surrounding
neighborhoods, and to residents and employees within the center area.
Private development and City initiated actions will have resulted in a balanced
transportation network that accommodates automobiles, public transportation, high
occupancy vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, and integrated parking. Pedestrian and
bicycle circulation is emphasized along with other travel modes. The downtown urban
fabric includes smaller blocks, lending itself to efficient and pleasant travel. Concentrated
South The amended Planned Action sub-area is shown on Map VII-2A. [Onlv this para�raph
and Map VII-2A were revised in 2010.7
City of Federal Way Boundaries of
Comprehensiv�e Plan Planned Action SEPA
;� . �
'
S 312th St
t����� � �,
Lct�t��r�� -
,�_
/r; �
�
, ( �: .
�� � ,,
� -- . _.._.... �-
.;-- _::�. _ .-.
Pa vilJions
Center
u�
�
x
w
S 320th St d
Cele6ratlon
� Cenrer
a Safeway
y
�
_
� --#' i
Celebration
Park
i� �
S 3i2th St
��
N
Walmart }
d
t
�
N
TQ j}
Foods
�
Ci�y Cenfer
Element
Map Vil-2A
� �
Hillsrde o► d
� raZa Q Steel Lake a
� Park ~
� «�
N N
S 316th 5t
Federa! Wa
y Trensii
a�
a Cenier
s
a
SeaTac d Pa
1IF1lage Q ' Wor1d
w Plaza
N
The Gommons at
Federal Way
Harry Trumart
High Schoo/
Gateway
Genter
S 320th St
N
w
n
a
�
�
�
S 32�ih St
Park & Ride
�
v
M
m
w
m
�
�
c
1
Legend
� PlannetJ Action SEPAArea
Surface Water
Park
Building
Street
This map is acoompanied by NO warranties.
City Center Core
City Center Frame
Map Date: March, 2007
� Scale:
N o sao �,00a Feet
� � �
[IfY 01
� Federal Way
Map prepared by the City of
Federal Way's GIS Division.
�� I
REPLACED BY MAP DATED JUNE 2010 - SEE NEXT PAGE
City of Federal Way Boundaries of
Comprehensive Plan Planned Action SEPA
The Commons at
Federa! Way
�..' ¢. �
K _.
� � cu�t� ��� � �
c�
L:`acic�r � � �
�.. . �:
�__ , ,.
— __ C i
� _ -, ,.� �' ~ , . - —
_�
i �: � � - ,
-_�, �� _
� __ ___ � -�� �
� :,�1- .� , �+ ,, ._..
, � ' • '� ( ' ' � ,� . ' �.
�, �n ,� �
�
- S 3121h SL
-- S 312th St
` ); ,;, . , :;'�<.. Pavq/fons
� : 'r. � j /,� � Center
�
, � ,°�
��,�-� �+� - ;
. ,: - __-,•,-
. . � _ __
: i, � ��, '�-
;�- -
c c s-� axc:- �_r1� �
`; ._ - �
� �-3�i:t_`�- .
m�
a,
�
�
�
ro
�
N
WaJmart }
¢
t
4
N
rop
Foods
N
�
a'
r
S
N
SeaTac
Vfllage
N
Hills�de m
Pfaza ¢
�
�
N
S 316th St
Federa/ Wa
�f81T5ft
Cenrer
'� Pa!-do
a World
.. Plaza
�
N
S 32Qth St
CelebraafOn
� Center
a Safeway
s
�
ti .. � _
`t'�.. ,��' —
y, .
°�'
Gelebration
Park
City Center
Elemenr
Map VII-2A
Steel Lake
Pa rk
�
d
a'
�
�
N
Harry Truman
Hlgh Schoor
Gateway
Center
.%:
�"�:
i I I l ,
i� � ,
N
�
�
a
a
m`
�
S 320tb St
Park 6 Rtde
� I
I . � i `:,-�.. M1 i
_ .. � �!...' � d f17i::,`- "��-
� �" � : i,a � �ik 1 �.:p ;� -
� � � ti�
� , ,, ,Y,-�,,�� �
�� �r.a
�`'��, } � `F ��-r" � �
� ��� r -ru� ��.4: .�
\`, -e ��'� �. '"� , r � �
� h
+m
:d
m
�fi
Legend
Q Planned Action SEPAArea
Surface VWater
Park
Building
screec
This map is accompanied by NQ warranties.
City Center Core
City Center Frame
Map Date: June, 2Q10
� Sca le:
N 0 500 1,000 Feet
� � �
urr or
�. FederallrVay
Map prepared by the City of
Federal Way's GIS Division.
REVISED MAP - REPLACES MAP DATED MARCH 2O07
Exhibit C
Proposed Amendments to
Chapter 8, Potential Annexation Area
. �............�, .....
4 ,_. . '. 6 �7�nd ST r `,
� �'+q �' .,_
> > > `9�� �
:f � �
� ��� � " ��
. �
s, zi�m sr .
�
� �
�
9�
�
_ . ..._—� � . _ i _
s zn�a��_ _ -- --..... ,a..t._� ;
t
r
�
! �,
�� f �
�,
:,, , ��
a � 1 xen!
� 1 SCAODI
� 01sMc1
s:ae�nsT. . � t�
h �
� ��
�
_
�
YY�.DUMOOC
E1FllilfTMY
S �04th 9T
� �
1 �
� , ( ?
s 3tsn, gr ' �f
� �1
x
c � y ^ � .�?
! �_ . i' A
d sa�hsT % t_ _f ^
882�thsT - � �6dBfa�
I `��
C+WH_OT
F1EYEiffMY
-�
� �
f c�r�?; f
1
�
�edrrar rvar M
Scnoor O1strIN r
� � = a7
�� ��,
1 <',
� .. .
�c�nrrM Nu
a�orrMr
p, ,-
.
I
i
A nbnrn
$Cb00/ �
' fed�rdl Way � ` o D1sMCl
i ScboOJ WsMcl , �, � � ��� �
�� �
sr ..
�
4W
�� � � = ' MYY ld
r �-- —f �'
� �.__�` � ,� ; i
��� , i �
_� i � '�
� �
� ' � k
`+ f:_. + j ! ,L ! , .,»�" ' � �. , �+'� j�
p�
� _ _ � y ,�t � �
, , ��.
.G '
q
�a' � �
' ` ,� 1 � i
l' f �
, �(!/'n�4 t � �
, N
, �� �� ��
/ a � � r ,r �
�� � � �
� � . ,�; }�}
�, �; ,� �..�.�....=i �� ��
� � � � �
�s�r�� _.�.....
��aMmar� �' ' .
I'! M Q p + i'3CifiG ��
r-_1�' �, � ,
.
City of Federal Way
Comprehe�sive Plan
Public Schaoi
Facilities
Potentlai Annexatlon
Area Element
��:
�V School 0�cU1ct Bouid�ry
� Elemantaryr ScAool
� .Arror wyih scnoo�
S�nla Hiph Sthool
PoteMy �w�xauon Am •
Commu��r l�vM SuDarou.
Shr Lrir (Northtrast�
Came+ot (Mnnhean)
.b+AV ISouMotq
lakManA (Sa�twasq
iaAar�l (SoutMacq
Otl�a Ar+ut:
fnoorponted Aroa
Uninoorpor�d Ara
Sourn: Feder�l Way School apnct.
C!y ol fadenl 6YS Oni�bn, 2001
7[CIA� •
wir
I �- . . � . .. ..
Sca�e: �
0 1�2 Mife
� N
Np� Re(o m�ariricd: 10�2008
mr3
CAy of Fedarsl Vfry,
33325 dth Are S,
Fedm►y Wa� WA 9l008
Cl53) e35 1000
www utyotfborWny.00m
aaos� Nole:
T1+�s m�p u inf�+dsd for u�e
u �pr�phial reD�ecenv6on
OI�Y, TTa City ol Fedary
Way m�kes no wur�nty
u �o It� aocuraqr-
�'`��"'"�'' Map VI11-14
.w..�l�.�.n,�p�..m0.b..�l.ere�ni
REPLACED BY MAP DATED JUNE 2010 - SEE NEXT PAGE
Sur Lat�
. #kme�l srY
'
MarG Twain
EMmentary �`
� ,_� �7
• ;� i �..
'�_
� �
_ . � �..
� �,
d . �
� .,' . .
,�
�
�. ! ..
_.S312thST
�'.
S 320th S7 '
N
� _. _r,—, �
I'-
i LL �� yy���l
U .SChot��1#iSbJCt1
a _ � � ; I��
� s 2ascn s � �- , �
� �: r l i, , � �} .. j ��_'
F � - -± � ' } � ~ f ' �� ``�
�--�,� -- � , , � :-
_
.. _� -
�
,` ,n
ti
Q -
�.
ti
2
EiMwcary
��r. a.n.ti +�a.rh� xw
ftemenlarY K�� �
IAldd�
Schoel
Evergreen Helghts
Elwmnu�y
■ A:
�� ,
.
. ;
, ,,�
— +- — — j ---=-__ ,
_� �
5 �11;;uh,:�c� Aubut►r
' �- �-�, SCi,�J I
~ �� � '�, �fSffR i .
�
' I }� � � ��Y f g _ -
__� 1 ----�,
hST /'�: � � __�_�
,'' � �—'' 7
' = � _ � � � .
,
, �7 -�- � � �� � �� � � � � ��,.
i �� , � �
�� _ � y^. °a ' i '
. , .
1 + __� _ �- � '. .!
__
— �
. _T----,1 -; - � . � �
� t f
� i � _.. � � � .. . . � � . I
J� i�`fi�' � f
_�
` f -�--.- , � ' ' ' i � '�
�p ' � t
i
� i�l 1,". � � ' Nl•.!. � � �i
7�
y � � L �; u� ' ��
Y �w � _ > �
�.�" �� I �� _ 4 � , � -
Q I
� . _ � ' :
,� 1 r � ; N _ , � � ` �
f �~ i ���� �
; ,_ � � � � ��
� � I � _ t--� .� �1.'':�., �,;
� ��'' �� ! `� . �
�%_ - � ! � � � .r
� i
�' � r A ' r � . FN�Schoall � ! � -
/ � _ � ` � �� � � ; � �•,
� _ _ __� I � _ ' n��,�.: r �
n+xd
Map VIII-14
� � � - �' �
,. ( .)�r' ' � Ken!
�.
_ �- }' � � , �,K,��
� �� 4; , � �;�r,Kr
�
��
�. ; I
! ��:]i'.� �t
i i %1,�--..
City af Federal Way
Comprehensi�e Plan
Public Sch�ol
Facilities
Potentia! Annexat�on
Area Element
Legend
Public School Facilities
- — School Distrid Boundary
School Locations
Potential Annexation A�ea
Cammunity Level Subareas:
Camelot iNoM East)
Jovita (South East)
Lakeland (South Easq
Parkway (South East)
Star lake (Naih East)
Other Areas
Inoorporated Area
Unincarporaled Area
0 025 0.5
� Mile � �
Map Reformatted O6l2010
C�ry of Federal Way,
33325 Sth Ave S,
Federal Way. WA. 88003
(253) 83�7000
www crtyoBedaralway.com
This map �s intended
tar use as a graph�cal
representation ONLY_
The Cdy of Fetleral Way
makes no warranry to
�!a accuracy
� Federal Way
REVISED MAP - JUNE 2010
Exhibit D
Vicinity Map
Site-Specific Request #1
Lloyd/Valiani
City of Federal Way
2010
Site Specific Requests
for Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Designation Changes
Lloyd / Valiani
Site Specific Request #1
Legend
Site Specific Request
Buildings
Streets
Streams (City Survey)
Wetlands (1998 City Survey)
� Zoning Boundary*
Note: An asterix (') next to a zoning
designation indicates the property is
governed by a development agreement.
�
N 0 250 500
Feet
� �Federal Way
This map is accompanied by no warranties,
and is simply a graphic representation.
R:\erike\cd\ComaPlan\Site Requests�2010�ssr1 2010.mxd
Exhibit E
Vicinity Map
Site-Specific Request #2
Song
City of Federal Way
2010
Site Specific Requests
for Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Designation Changes
Song
Site Specific Request #2
Legend
Site Specific Request
Buildings
Streets
Streams (City Survey)
Wetlands (1998 City Survey)
� Zoning Boundary*
Note: An asterix ("`) next to a zoning
designation indicates the property is
governed by a development agreement.
�
N 0 250 500
Feet
CITY OF
� Federal Way
This map is accompanied by no warranties,
and is simply a graphic representation.
R:\erike\cd\CompPlan\Site_Req uests�2010�ssr2_2010.mxd
Exhibit F
Vicinity Map
Site-Specific Request #3
ST Fabrication
City of Federal Way
2010
Site Specific Requests
for Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Designation Changes
ST Fabrication
Site Specific Request #3
Legend
Site Specific Request
Buildings
Streets
Streams (City Survey)
Wetlands (1998 City Survey)
� Zoning Boundary
�
N 0 250 500
Feet
CITV OF
� Federal Way
This map is accompanied by no warranties,
and is simply a graphic representation.
R:\erike\cd\CompPlan\S ite_Req uests�2010�ssr3_2010.mxd
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 10/OS/2010
CITY OF FEDERAL WA�
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
ITEM #: �_
5UBJECT: Amendments to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 18 and Chapter 19 regarding submittal
requirements for plats and commercial projects.
POLICY QUESTION: Should the City of Federal Way approve amendments to Federal Way Revised Code
(FWRC), Chapter 18 and Chapter 19, that establishes submittal requirement checklists and submittal requirement
standardization for plats and commercial projects?
COMMITTEE: Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC)
CATEGORY:
❑ Consent
� Ordinance
❑ City Counc B ❑ Res
STAFF REPORT BY: Deb Barker, Senior Planner
MEETING DATE: 09/20/2010
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Oth
DEPT Community Development Services
Attachments: (1) Draft Adoption Ordinance; (2) Staff Report to the Planning Commission for the August 25,
2010,Public Hearing; and (3) Draft Minutes of the August 25, 2010, Planning Commission Public Hearing.
Options Considered: (1) Adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation as shown in the Draft Adoption
ordinance; (2) Adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation as modified by the LUTC; (3) Do not adopt
the amendments,:_or�4�Re, f'er the amendments back to the Planni� Commission or�e�roceedings• _____
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council approve Option #1; adopt the Planning Commission's
recommendation reflected in the Draft Adoption Ordinance.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: .�,.��I�,� ��NI� DIRECTOR APPROVAL: `�'1' __�
Committee Council Committee Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION I move to forward the proposed ordinance to First Reading on October S
2010. �
��
Committee Chair
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION(S):
Member
1 READING OF ORDINANCE (10/OS/2010): I move to forward the ordinance to a second reading for
enactment on the October 19, 2010 consent agenda.
2 ND READING OF ORDINANCE (10/19/2010) I move approval of the L UTC recommendation to approve the
code amendments, which are refZected in the Adoption Ordinance. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION: �
❑ APPROVED ' COUNCIL BILL # �`) Z.
❑ DENIED 1sT reading ((7 ' S' � �
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED — 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION #
Council Meeting Date: October 5, 2010
City Council Agenda Bill
Attachment #1
Draft Adoption Ordinance:
Amendments to F WRC Chapter 18 and Chapter 19 regarding submittal
requirements for plats and commercial projects.
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating
to submittal requirements for plats and commercial projects;
amending FWRC 18.30.030, FWRC 18.35.050, and FWRC 19.15.040.
(Amending Ordinance Nos. 09-610, 09-594, 07-554, 98-309, 97-291,
and 90-41)
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the need to periodically modify Title 18 and Title 19 of the
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC), "Zoning and Development Code," in order to conform to state and
federal law, codify administrative practices, clarify and update zoning regulations as deemed necessary,
and improve the efficiency of the regulations and the development review process; and
WHEREAS, this ardinance, containing amendments to the text of Title 18 FWRC and the text of
Title 19 FWRC, has complied with Process VI review, chapter 19.80 FWRC, pursuant to chapter 19.35
FWRC; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the City Council to adopt standards for submittal
requirements that allow the application submittal process to be more straightforward within the City of
Federal Way; and
WHEREAS, Stakeholder groups indicated that subdivision applications require too much
information too early in the process; and
WHEREAS, staff found that although requested submittal items are needed in order to review
applications, some discretion can be applied to those initial submittal requirements that are listed in the
FWRC; and
WHEREAS, standardizing submittal requirements and technical handouts for plats and
commercial projects makes the submittal process less complicated for the applicant; and
WHEREAS, locating necessary submittal requirements into a checklist format allows staff to
request only that information that is necessary to review; and
WHEREAS, use of a standardized submittal checklist allows increased flexibility as technology
evolves; and
Ordinance No. 10 - Page 1 of 9
WHEREAS, the director may continue to waive any submittal requirements determined to be not
reasonably necessary; and
WHEREAS, the Proposal. is categorically exempt from environmental review under the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(20); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission properly conducted a duly noticed public hearing on these
code amendments on August 25, 2010, and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council;
and
WHEREAS, the Land Use/Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council
considered these code amendments on September 20, 2010, and recommended adoption of the text
amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Federal Way makes the following findings
with respect to the proposed amendments.
(a) These code amendments are in the best interest of the residents of the City and will
benefit the City as a whole by clarifying what constitutes a complete application.
(b) These code amendments comply with Chapter 36.70A RCW, Growth Management.
(c) These code amendments are consistent with the intent and purpose of Title 18 FWRC and
Title 19 FWRC and will implement and are consistent with the applicable provisions of the Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan.
(d) These code amendments bear a substantial relationship to, and will protect and not
adversely affect, the public health, safety, and welfare.
(e) These code amendments have followed the proper procedure required under the FWRC.
Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to chapter 19.80 FWRC and chapter 19.35 FWRC, and based
upon the recitals and the findings set forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council makes the
Ordinance No. 10 - Page 2 of 9
following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the adoption of the
proposed amendments:
(a) The proposed FWRC amendments are consistent with, and substantially implement, the
following Federal Way Comprehensive Plan goals and policies:
LUP4 Maximize efficiency of the development review process.
EDPI S The City will continue to implement a streamlined permitting process consistent with
state and federal regulations to reduce the upfront costs of locating businesses in the
City.
EDP18 The City will periodically monitor local and regional trends to be able to adjust plans,
policies, and programs.
HP9 Maximize ef�ciency in the City's development review process and ensure that
unnecessary time delays and expenses are eliminated. Continue to provide streamlined
permitting processes for development that is consistent with the FWCP and FWCC,
and that has no adverse impacts.
(b) The proposed FWRC amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health,
safety, and welfare because it standardizes submittal requirements to clarify what constitutes a complete
application in order to increase the efficiency of the development review processes.
(c) The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the public and the residents of the City
of Federal Way because clarity in the application process results in continued development within the
City thus aiding the local economy.
Section 3. FWRC 18.30.030 is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.30.030 Content and form of application.
All short subdivision a�plications must at the minimum provide the information contained within
City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services Bulletin #010, Short
Subdivision Submittal Requirements. The submittal requirements are not intended to determine if
an a�plication conforms to city of Federal Way codes. Thev are used only to determine if all
required materials have been submitted. A code related review will occur after a complete
application has been submitted The director may waive an� sections determined to be not
reasonably necessarv.
Ordinance No. 10 - Page 3 of 9
.
- - - �
._ _
� -
i
- - - � � -
\
� - -
- - � � - � "
r
- �� - - -
� - - - -
.T.lT�Slf.
•
!r\ T....;,..,1 ,- ...a..,..., �o..�;,.,�.� lo.,:�r;,-.�. .,,,..�1 ,�, o�L
( l T � 1 F �L. '� i ++ ,a ,. +., ., o..+;,.,. ,.4' �„�, 1,.+� �.-.,..+� ,�+l.o
,....b.. ..� �,.., ..,.�.J 1.....��.... t ..,:. ... �.�»...,.. .,� »' -_.'..� "^--"� �- ------
`� ��c�' � �n
�
> > e > >
,-o,] 1.. . ,.,-; �; ,...1 .. , ,1., �: ,,,. �
Ordinance No. 10 - Page 4 of 9
- - - � � � � � -
.,�.,1 ,a„ .,�.,�'�
( l Tl. 4' r.,L.l'.,1-.0,�1 1-.., �L.o ..:+.. Tb.o .. ,.1;...,�;.... �l-..,11 .-,.,� L.o ., o +o.a , . ;� ;
vv.. .,..,......, ... ..,
_ .t ,
.C,O. � -
Section 4. FWRC 18.35.020 is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.35.020 Content and form of application.
All preliminaryplat applications must at the minimum provide the information contained within
Citv of Federal Way Departrnent of Community Development Services Bulletin #037
Preliminarv Plat Submittal Rec�uirements The submittal requirements are not intended to
detertnine if an a�plication conforms to city of Federal Way codes. They are used onl ��to
determined if all required materials have been submitted. A code related review will occur after a
complete application has been submitted The director ma� waive any sections determined to be
not reasonably necessar�
,.,.o ,. ��oa ;� +�,o ,. .,�;,..,+;,,�
("f\ TL, f'�1�. ,] �.,1..7;.,:�:.,.�. .,,,..] ,-. o .-.,*;.,., .,4'41�e ,..1.,+ � vv ,�.,.,.7o L..,
...»�.., .,> � .
�
,��.,�;�.,� ,.F+L.o 1..,..a� ....+,,.,11<. � .o.a
/2l Tl. 1; .,�;,� �l..,il l.o o,a l.,> *l.0 4;,11.. ,,4' •,+; ,,.
( l T + 1'�1, ,7 1' ,.1.,� ,a,- ♦,. .,lo �4'., o .,t, «o o ..�..
uav v� ...... ..........t.:............
! l �6cu�i9 �' scc�i9rr��-rrS�� ••+b.o lo�..,t .ao�...-.,.�;.�,
C 1Tr' '�r > > > ....
i;;;� ,.T,,,...e .,aa.-o�� ra rt,,,�o „ w,t�o,- ,.�' aa.,o��,,�
> > •
�,� r� „aa.-o ra ��.,. ,....i,o „�o ,.�, r o,.,-., o..��..
� "� "
i.,��.� „aa..o��� .,ra �i.,.�o r _...�.o,- „�,.o,,;�+o,-oa i,..,a : �� .��, �:.
�.,:� e,.,.io „�,.i.,� a„+o ra r,,,-.i. „ „�
> >� .
� •� � +• + �. �+i, t.,.,a �a; .,�oa w, „*,. „t'+.. ���::��..���
�,- �i,,..o� io�� +t�..r i c,. .,� .,ra F;.,o t�„� ;��o.�.,.,i� � ,- �t,..,o� „� i c,.o or� „ e..+e,.
e o r a Y.......... ..'� b ' »..._.
[.,;;;� n,.,,,,,-.,�o ,�oi;ro.,�;,,,, ,.c��+oor �l�.,e� nn ,. o�� „ o.,�o,.
°,- v....� .,'� b. ..�......
/' .l T +' �7 -♦ � 4' '4` +,...,+,,,-.,1 C .,+,,.-o� ., ,��_;,.,,..,e,7:.,+e1..
.,..�..,.�
. > > >
e
;..�o.a 1�,,,f'� ,-., .,Ff�..4 �l,o ,. 0,7 ..,-ol„,,:,,,,,-.. ,�ln+
Ordinance No. 10 - Page 5 of 9
�- - -
. . . - - - . -
_ - •� -
.
.
- �� - -
- - - - ..
. -
'a - -
_ •
� � � � .
� ��
Ordinance No. 10 - Page 6 of 9
• - - - -
. _
Section 5. FWRC 19.15.040 is hereby amended to read as follows:
19.15.040 Development application submittal requirements.
All use process I, II, III and N applications �e�es�s ���'���'� ~' °�`'°+°r""'""''^^ `^''° ^"
*� �••��*��r � r��*� ^ r��^�*��r'���'�°°� ���'�-��**°a must at the minimum provide the
information contained within City of Federal Wa�Department of Community Development
Services Bulletin #053 Development Rec�uirements for Process I, Bulletin #054, Development
Repuirements Process II or Bulletin #001 Develo Requirements Handout for Process
III or IV depending on the particular Use Process being applied for. The submittal requirements
are not intended to determine if an application conforms to city of Federal Way codes. They are
used only to determine if all required materials have been submitted. A code-related review will
occur after a complete application has been submitted. The director may waive any sections
determined to be not reasonably necessary.
/l l TR.,�ro.- 1.,,�,7 , ..1;,..,�;,,.,
(')\ A „«.1;....�;.,., � o� ., e+ .,,,+ ;,,. �l.o .,.1,,,.�o.] F o .,,-.a;«.�,��a
('2\ !',.,�.. „F,..,,]o«1..;,�,. ,.1.,+ ,�« TI:.,,. !'',,,,..+., .. ,,,-'� ol �,
> >
i i�tei}� - e�� " �cr-rTrr.rI''��rnr !`,..,,....,,..;k, rlo�;,.,., r_,,;aot;,,o�
�
!'7l T,.,,. ,. ,.(',.,,,-..o,�.� +:+lo ,. ,,.-t 4',,,- �„1-.;0..� Y,�- ,.o,-f..
�* ' e�i a ge-a �s �W��E ' °.'��
���
. . , �
�i,.�� ; ,,;i,.�.io „* +i,o aor.,,-�r...o�+
�
> >
.,io „�,.ro ; ,.�. ,. ,..�� �n � o+
> > > >
> > >
> > > > >
. ,
> > >
,� rt,o �:�o ,�1.,
(1!1\ T7' l.� ' F�l, le+ ,1 ' ,7 ,] ,a.,+o,] C�DA �l,0�1l1;�+
�T6'zc-cvpicsv�rcn�. cvrrxPrccc�i'r�z�.�c ... ...1� � � ................
Ordinance No. 10 - Page 7 of 9
_ .� -
� - - - - �� --
. .
� - - - - - - -
•- -
- - - - ..�
•- „ �„ -
� ���
� „
.
a
Section 6. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The
invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the
invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the
remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to any other persons or circumstances.
Section 7. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to make
necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener/clerical
errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto.
Section 8. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this
ordinance is hereby rati�ed and affirmed.
Section 9. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective �ve (5) days after passage and
publication as provided by law.
Ordinance No. 10 - Page 8 of 9
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of
20 .
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, LINDA KOCHMAR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, CAROL MCNEILLY, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTNE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.:
Ordinance No. 10 - Page 9 of 9
City Council Agenda Bill
Attachment #2:
Staff Report to the Planning Commission:
Amendments to FWRC Chapter 18 Subdivisions, and Chapter 19
regarding submittal requirements for plats and commercial projects.
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
cirY oF �'
Federal U1lay
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Ptanning Commission Meeting of August 25, 2010
Amendments to Federa! Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 18 — Subdivisions,
Chapter 19.15.040 — Development Application Submittal Requirements,
Chapter 19.15.045 — Comp[eteness ofApptieations, and
Chapter 19.15.030 — Review Processes for improvements and additions to developed sites.
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PLATS AND COMNIERCIAL PROJECTS
Federat Way Fite No. 10-102132-00-UP
Report prepared by Senior Ptanner Deb Barker
I. PURPOS� OF AMENDMENT
As part of t6e 2010 Pianning Commission Work Program, City sta.ff proposes amendments to the
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) to address issues identified by the City Council and the City's
Stakeholder Group. At this time, staff is proposing to clarify which projects are subject to
compieteness standards, and is further proposing that the submittal requirements for plats and
commercial projects be standardized, to the extent possible, in order to assist deve(opers in the
application process, to ensure consistency in project completeness, and to provide data. necessary for
the annual Buildable Lands Reports required by King County. One housekeeping amendment is also
proposed.
LI. BACKGROUiYD
The City of Federal Way Stakeholder Group has conducted annua.t meetings to review City codes
and procedures since 2006. One concern was that p(at applications are too detailed and require too
much information too early in the process_ Staff has reviewed the requirements for various projects
and found that for the most part, submittat items currently requested are needed in order to review
plat applications, but some discretion can be applied to initial submittal requirements that are
currently listed in the FWRC. Staffalso identified the need to clarify language regarding
comp(eteness standards for Process I, Q, III, and N land use review processes. A housekeeping
amendment is atso proposed.
III. SUI�IMARY OF PROPOSED CODE AMENDMEIYTS
To effectively communicate the submittal requirements and ctarify the objectives for review, staff
proposes to re(ocate submittal requirements from the FWRC into standardized submitta( requirement
checklists and/or technical handouts (see attached exhibits). Standardizing submittal requirements
checklists and technical handouts wilt make the submittal process more straight forward for the
appiicant when preparing an application, and will suppoct their ability to submit a complete
app(ication. [n this time of changing techno(o;y, some rypical requirements become outdated_ A
checklist allows customization and provides flexibility as technology evotves. In addition to the
standardized submittal requirements, this code amendment clarifies that Use Process i, [I, III, and N
are subject to completeness review. The following is a summary of the proposed amendments:
(a) Sho�t Subdivisions — Chapter 18.30.030 Content and form of application
FWRC 18.30.030 lists the standards for the app(ication for a short plat_ This language is also
used for app(ications for binding site plans. FWRC 18.30.030(2) (ists thirty separate items that
must be depicted on a submiited short plat drawing or submitted with the formal application.
The purpose of this amendment is to etiminate this section and replace it with languaae that
refers to the checklist that is maintained by City staff. See Exhibit A— FWRC 18.30_ 030
Content and forrn of application and Exhibit B— Bulletin #101, Short Subdivision.
(b) Preliminary Plai — Chapter 18.35.020 Content and form of app[ication
FWEZC 1835.OZO lists the standards for a preliminary ptat apptication. FWRC 1835.020(2)
lists over thirry separate items that must be depicted on submitted drawings or included with the
formal apptication. The purpose of this amendment is to eliminate this section and replace it
with language that refers to the checklist that is maintained by stafF. See Exhibit C— FWRC
18.35.020 Content and form of application and Exhibit D— Bulletin #037, Preliminary Plat
Submittal Requirements.
(c} Permits and Review Processes — Chapter 19.15.040 Development App[ication Submittal
Requirements
FWRC 19.15.040 (ists the standards for a commercial project app(ication which require a
determination of completeness. FWRC 19. L�.040 (ists over thirly separate items that must be
depicted on submitted drawings or provided with the application, but does not clarify which
applications are subject to completeness review. The purpose of this amendment is to clarify
that Process I, Q, III and IV projects are subject to completeness review. The amendment also
eliminates the list of submittal requirements and rep(aces it with language that refers to
checktists that are maintained by City staff. See Exhibit E— FWRC 19.1.5.040 Development
Application Submittal Requirements, Exhibit F— Bulletin #0�3, Development Requirements for
Process I, Exhibit G— Bulletin #O.S4, Development Requirements for Process II, and Exhibit
H— Bulletin #001, Development Requirements for Process III or IT!
(� Permits and Review Processes — Chapter 19.1 S.04S Completeness of Applications
FWRC 19.15.045 identifies the timing and steps that the city must take when an app(ication is
determined to be complete. Although state regulations. dictate notice of complete application for
specific procedural actions, the current code does not distinguish how different land use
processes are treated with respect to completeness. The purpose of this amendment is to c(arify
that Process I, II, QI, and IV land use processes are subject to completeness standards.
In addition, this amendment is intended to clarify comp(eteness review procedures. Use Process
I and Process II receive expedited completeness review at the time of application intake and the
Piauning Canmiec� $p({ Repo[t
K:�2009 Code Aatendments�Submittal requiremerts4Staff cepoR\Current s�ErepoR with axh+bits\STAFF REPORT current with hoasekeepiag amendmentdoc Page 2
app(icant is provided with a"notice of completeness" at intake. However, Process III and [V
applications ceceive completeness review during Devetopment Review Committee (DRC)
deliberations that are scheduled within 28 days of receipt of the application. The applicant is
mai(ed a letter oFcompleteness fol(owing DRC review. See Exhibit 1— FWRC 19.15.045
Completeness of Applications.
(e) Permits and Review Processes — Chapter FWRC 19.IS.030(1)(f) Review Processes for
improvements and additions to developed sites
A housekeeping amendment is being proposed to rep(ace the term "sensitive" areas with the
tercn "critical" areas and eliminate references to the term "significant tree." The term
"sensitive" area was changed to "criticaP' area in a 2004 code amendment. The term "sensitive"
area currently found in F WRC 19_ I 5.030(1)(� was not changed as part of that 2004 code
amendment; this amendment corrects that oversight. Also, the term "significant tree" was
eliminated as a result of the 2009 code amendment for "Clearing, Grading and Tree and
vegetation Retention. " The proposed change eliminates this term &om FWRC 19.15.034(1)(�
as it is no longer used in the FWRC. See Ezhibit J— FWRC 19_ 1�, 030 Review processes for
improvements and additions to developed sites.
IV. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
The Project is procedurally exempt &om State Environmenta! Policy Act (SEPA) review under
WAC i97-11-800( t 9) (Procedura! Actions). Public Notice of the August 4, 2010, public hearing
was published and posted on July 17, 2010, in accordance with the City's procedural requirements.
There were no public comments.
V. DECISIONAL CRITERIA
FWRC 19.80.130 provides criteria for zoning text amendments. The following section analyzes the
comptiance of the proposed zoning text amendments with the criteria provided by FWRC t9.80.130.
The City may amend the text of the FWRC only if it finds that:
The proposed amendments are consistent with the applieab(e provisions of the
comprehensive plan.
The proposed FWRC zoning text amendments are consistent with the following goats and
po(icies conta.ined in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP):
LUGZ Develop an efficient and timely development review process based on a pubtic/private
partnershiQ.
LUP4 Maximize efficiency of the development review process.
EDPI� The City wi(t continue to implement a streamlined permitting process consistent with
sta.te and federal regulations to reduce the upfront costs of loca.ting businesses in the
City.
EDP18 The City will periodically monitor tocal and regional trends to be able to adjust plans,
policies, and programs.
HP9 Malcimize efficiency in the City's development review process and ensure that
unnecessary time delays and expenses are eliminated. Continue to provide streamlined
permitting processes for devetopment that is consistent with the FWCP and FWCC,
and that has no adverse impacts.
PWaning Commission Staff Repoct
K:12009 Code Amendmeats\Submittal requiremeotslStaff repo[tSCwrent staff report wit6 cxlubitslSTAFF REPORI' cwrent wit6 houselceepiug ameodmentdoc Page 3
HPIO Encourage community input, where appropriate, into the development permit process
by providing thorough and timely information to the public.
HP11 Continue to assist developers with housing proposais at the earliest possib(e
opportunity, inc(uding pceapplication meetings, to produce projects that can be
reviewed quickly and maximize their ability to receive permits_
The proposed amendment bears a substanNal relationship to public health, safety, or
welfare.
The proposed FWRC text amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public
hea(th, safety, or welfare because it standardizes development regulations to provide
ctarity about what constitutes a comptete application; defines comp(eteness eligibility;
and refines various related codes in order to increase the efficiency of the development
review process.
The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the City.
Approval of the proposed code amendment would benefit the City as a whole as it provides
c(arity about what constitutes a complete application, which results in continued deve(opment
within the City, thus aiding the local economy and the housing market.
VI. PLANYING COMMISSIOi�i REVIEW AND ACTIOIY
Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.050(b}, the City CounciE may review City-initiated changes to the text of
the zoning code from time to time at the Council's discretion. The Planning Commission is being
asked to review the proposed changes to the zoning code and forward a recommendation to the City
CounciL Chapter 19.80 FWRC, "Process VI Review," establishes a process and criteria for wning
code text amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the role of the P(anning Commission is to
review and evalua.te the zoning code text regarding any proposed amendments; to determine whether
the proposed zoning code text amendment meets the criteria provided by FWRC t9.80.130; and to
forward a recommendation to City Council regarding adoption of the proposed zoning code text
amendment. Consistent with the provisions of FWRC i9.80.240, the Planning Commission may take
the following actions regarding the proposed zoning code text amendments:
1. Recommend to City Council adoption of the EWRC text amendments as proposed;
2. Modify the proposed FWRC text amendments and recommend to City Council adoption of
the EWRC text amendments as modified;
3. Recommend to City Council that the proposed FWRC text amendments not be adopted; or
4. Forward the proposed FWRC text amendments to City Council without a recommendation.
VII. STAFF RECOMMENDATIOPI
Based on the above staff analysis and decisiona( criteria, staff recommends that the following
amendments to FWRC Title 18 Subdivisions, and to Chapter 19.15 FWRC Permits and Review
Processes as outlined in Section III above be recommended for approval to the City Council.
l. Amendments as set forth in Exhibit A, to FWRC 18.30.030, Content and form of
application. �
2. Amendments as set forth in Exhibit C, to FWRC 1835.020, Content and form of
application.
e� co���o� s� ��R
(C12009 Code Ameadmentsl$ubmittal requiremeatsLStaff repoct\Cu�rent staff �epoct with ezhibits�.STAFF REPORT currera with housekeeping amendmentdoc Page 4
3. Amendments as set Porth in E�ct►ibit E, to FWRC 19.15.040, Development Application
Submitta( Requirements.
4. Amendments as set forth in Exhibit I, to FWRC 19.15_045, Completeness of
Apptications.
5. Amendments as set forth in E�chibit J, to FWRC 19.15_030, Review processes for
improvements and additions to developed sites.
ExHiBCCs
Exhibit A, FWRC 18.30_030 Content and form of application (Short subdivision)
Exhibit B, Revised Short Subdivision Handout
Exhibit C, FWRC l8_35.020 Content and jorm of application (Preiiminary ptat)
Exhibit D, Revised Pre(iminary Plat Submittal Requirements Handout
E�chibit E, FWRC 19.15.040 Development App[ication Submittal Requirements
Exhibit P, Checklist for Development Requirements for Process i, Director's Approval
Exhibit G, Revised Checktist Eor Development Requirements for Process [I, Site Plan Review
Exhibit H, [tevised Checklist for Development Requirements, Process III (Project Approval) or
Process IV (Hearing £xaminer Rpprova!)
Exhibit I, FWRC 19.15.045 Completeness of applications
Exhibit J, FWRC 19.15_030 Review processes for improvements and additions to developed sites
Pfanning Commission Staff Repat
KL009 Code Amendme�tslSubmittai requiremmtslStaff report\Cument sraff repoR with exlubi[s�.STAFF REPORT cucreot with housekeepi�g aznendmeatdoc Page i
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 18.30, "Short Subdivisions"
18.30.030 "Content and form of application"
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
ExhibitA
18.30.030 Contenf and form of application.
Aii short subdivision applications must at the minimum provide the information
contained within Bulletin #010 Short Subdivision Su6miital Requirements. The
submittal requirements are not intended to determine if an application conforms
to citv of Federal Way codes. They are used only to determine if all required
materials harre been submitted A code related review wil! occur after a complete
ap�lication has been submitted The director mav waive any sections determined
to be not reasonab(y necessarY.
#��-a�isa�ie�:
,
, , ,
, , -
, , -
, , •
, , -
� -
. , , ,
, . ,
, , ,
.+n� T�ve .�r�rl \/one}s�ic�r� L�o�on�inn_
e � �
> >
- - - - � - - -
.
.
.
.
.
.
- - - - -- _��-...�:.� - — :.��..=��..o.:- :.-.:--e.�,: - °���
�f2&-
��}�€-���-a-�e�R�G-�4�-8�-�e�s�ce�p�e�c,�c-taes{cr°�r
��L��r ren��ir�r1 en�nr�nmon} rinn�imon}.+}i�n
. ...y......... �..�...��.���..v�.�u. - .
E��!t�c� i� in �ni.�mr�nr�i�.�l h�i �ho ron� �on}o� foo
��— "'_ �__�'.. ..�) ....� ..�..�....�....�.. .�.�.
(Ord. No. 09-610, § 3(Exh. A), 4-7-09; Ord. No. 07-554, § 5(Exh. A(2)), 5-15-07;
Ord. No. 97-291, § 3, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 90-41, § 1(16.150.10 —16.150.30), 2-27-
90. Code 2001 § 20-83.)
K:12009 Code AmeodmrntslSubmittal requiremmts�Siaff reportlCurrmt staff teport with adubits�Exhibes A, B, C, DVExlubit A t8.30 short plaz.doc Page 2
EXHIBIT B
EXHIBIT TO PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 18.30, "Short Subdivisions"
Bulletin O10 - Short Subdivision
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
�
Ci3Y �F
Federal ���
DEPAR�tE�lT OE COMMU�ItTY DEVELOP�IENt SERYICSS
3332� 8`� Avenue South�
PO Box 9718
Fedecal Way WA 98063-9718
2�3-83�-2607;Fax 2�3-83�-3609
www.cityoffederalway.com
SHORT SUBDlVISION
PURPOSE
A short subdivision (i.e., short plat) is the division or re-division of land into nine or fewer lots for the
purpose of sale, lease, or transfer of ownership. A short subdivision may be a conventional or cluster
subdivision, cottage housing, zero-Lot line townhouse development, or small tot detached development of
nine or fewer lots, as we[l as a binding site plan. A short subdivision must be approved and recorded
before newty created lots may be legatly sold.
HOW Ta APPIY
The applicant (owner or owner's appointed agent} files a compiete application with the Department of
Community Development Services using the Master Land Use Appticaxion form available at the
department (and on our website, www_cityoffederalway.com). The applicant also provides any information
or materiat as specified in the provisions of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) describing the
decision applied for and any additionat information or material that the determines is reasonab(y
necessary for a decision on the mattec Please refer to the foltowing "Submittal Requirements" section to
determine the materiats that must be submitted to complete your application for a short subdivision.
PREAPPUCAflON CONFERENCE
Appticants are encoura.ged to schedule a preapplication conference to become familiar with FWRC
requirements, policies, and regulations_ [t is a(so an opportunity to coordinate with City departments and
obtain their comments on the proposed subdivision. Refer to the City's preapp(ication conference handout
for information on preapplication conferences.
WHO MAKES TNE DECiSION
The director will malce the decision on the short subdivision. The applicatioa is processed under the
provisions of Chapter 1830 FWRC, "Short Subdivision Ptats." Your application will be evaluated on the
basis of the information you provide, the criteria listed in the pectinent sections of the City's regulations,
and inspection ofthe properly. Short subdivisions shall be designed to the standards of FWRC 18.55.010
through 080, and 18_60.030 through 120. Upon determining that the short subdivision application is
complete, the directoc (or his/her designee) sha(1 distribute a notice of complete application.
COMPLIANCE WITH SEPA
Short subdivisions aze usually exempt &om the Washington Sta.te Environmenta.t Po(icy Act (SEPA).
However, a SEPA checklist and corresponding fee will be required if any of the foilowing is associated
with the short subdivision: 1) the site is subject to critical area review; 2) the short subdivision requires
stormwater, sewec, or water lines lacger than eight inches in diameter, 3) the short subdivision occurs on
K�2009 Cade Amendmrnts�Su6mNm1 teqwr�mtslStaff reportlCutrent sn@'teport with a�iu'bits�Exttibi[s .t B. C, D1Fxhbit B- Bulletm O10 Short Subdviaoadac Page 1
tand covered 6y water; or 4) the short subdivision is a further subdivision of a previous(y exempted shart
subdivision. The director witl determine the scope of the environmenta( review required by the app(ication
in order to comply with SEPA. For a detailed exp(anation of the City's environmental policy, refer to
FVf/RC Title t 4.
CRITICAL AREAS
Projects that involve work within criticat areas (e.g_, wet[ands, streams, steep slopes, and lakes) may
require that the City contract out for expert technicai assistance. Pursuant to FWRC 19.t50.030, the
applicant is responsible for providing any information, mapping, studies, and materials, and for paying for
inspections or review by a qua(ified professional acceptable to the City. You witl be advised at an ear(y
point in the process ifyour project will be subject to these types ofexpenses_
SHORELINES
Short subdivision that are within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of Puget Sound, Steei Lake,
North Lake, or Lake Ki(amey require review under the city's Shore(ine Master Program. Applicants should
speak with department staff for fucther infocmation regarding shoreline regulatioas prior to submitting a
formal application.
TRAFFIC-RELATED REQUIREMENTS
A(1 short subdivisions are subject to transportation concurrency and Traffic Impact Fee requirements. Refer
to Concurrency Apptication Information and Tr�c Impact Fee handouts for additional information.
APPEALS
Any decision issued by the director can be appealed. The City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner decides
appeals of short subdivision decisions after a pubtic hearing. See EWRC 18.30.140, et seq. for detailed
infocmation regarding appeals of short subdivision decisions.
RECORDING
The City records atl approved short subdivisions with the King County Division of Records and Elections_
A copy of the documents (referred to as a short piat), stamped with the recording number, is then
distributed to the applicant, file, and King County Department of Assessments. All fees for such recording
must be paid by the applicant before recording.
Bultetin #Ol0 June 7, 2010 Page 2 of � k1Elandouts\Short Subdivision
SHORT SUBDIVISION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
A compieie apptication is required before the City car, proceed with technical analysis and make an
informed decision on your application. Following is a(ist of materials that must be submitted with your
applicarion_ Please do not turn in your apptication until att items on the list that appiy to your proposat
have been utcluded. Consult with the Department of Community Development Services if you have a
question_ A(I application materials become public infoRnation.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Et ired Submitted
- '' A. Completed Master Land Use Application form including signaxure of persons with
�= r� n ownership interest in the property_ Agent authorization is required if apptication is not
�._' ,:� ''���:-` si ed b owners of atl sub'ect arcets.
�'� ��� _` a` B. All application fees
�
:�, � ;:. � : =�
-� �� 9 ='�,� .�- : C. Two copies of a computation sheet (with surveyor's seal) that provides the square footage
,� , .�L�.y � � M1 ��.�.' ,.
� �� � of all streets, individual lots and tracts, and total area contained within the subject parcels,
1�;=. , � �, � � ' :
���., �, � �,� t.�� � i.e. lot closure calculations_
,��'�:��`°��: -��`��ar-'�:=�;� D. Two copies of a title report for the subject property, prepazed within 90 days, inctuding
�� „
"�'A` any easements or restrictions affecting the properties with a description, purpose, and
��
�� ��� �� �' ° reference by audito�'s file number aad/or recordina number; pazties of interest; and any
f.
x�±��,,, _� F .��.�`�.. ; �_�_ , restricrions or covenants r�uinin with the ro e
x��°�� ��=�� ���' = E. A copy of the current county quarter section map for the area. (These maps can be found at
�
f �� _� - ' - `z::;
��; metrokc. ov.
t � :.. �+,�. �� ;' F. Vicinity map on separate 8%Z x t I sheet
�` - ''' G. Two copies of certificate of water availabitity, signed within a year of the date of
��� `' `� '" a lication onl re uired for vacant co erty).
� � , H. �ne copy of cectificate of sewer availability, si�ed within a year of the date of
'� �� '` application, unless the site is to be served by an on-site septic system. One copy of the
� .� �
Seattie-King Couttty Health Department approval of the proposed subdivision is required,
- if the ro�ect is to be served b on-site se tic s stem
�� �`� '-� I. Site photographs from each compass point (north, east, south, & west) rePerenced
�; � k� _.
� __ r. :�,>=. on the site lan
�y �:� ��` - ;' J. Two copies of prel'un'�nacy engineering dra.wing showing the tocation and size of atl
�_ �� � ditches, cutverts, catchbasins, and other parts of the design for the control of surface water
- " draina e. This is a se arate sheet �om the short !at ma .)
�` `��:y =: � K. Two copies of a preliminary ciearing and grading and tree/vegeta.tion retention plans_
�' •'- Q; consistent with Chapter 19.120.040 FWRC, Clearing, Grading and Tree and Vegetation
.h_ ;:;
- Retention.
: L. Two copies of a preliminary Technicat Information [Zeport (TIR), if required per the
��. }� �:�5� �° Kin Coun S ace Water Desi n Manua! KCSWDM}_
�� �'� ��'��� M. Additional information as required by the Community Development Services and/or Pubtic
�� �"�
��:y�:�'� � . �� �°= Works De arrhnments.
"� "���` ~ `� N. Seven full size prints of�e pcoposed short plat as specifred below as well as one copy of
�� �� � t
� � � �n� ; � �;;
�; ;:��- �:� 8-1/2 by 11 inch paper. Oae set of reproducible mylar drawings witl be required after the
� ' short lat is a roved, rior to si in� and recordin .
Butletin #O l0 —June 7, 2010 Page 3 of � k�1 [andoutslShoR Subdivision
SEVEN COPIES OF FULL SIZE PLANS (ASSEMBIED IN SETS AND FOLDED TO 9 X 12��)
The drawing shal( be l 8" x 24"in size, drawn to a scale of 1"=50' or targer on the City's standard short plat
title block form, and must comQly with the provisions of RCW 58.09 and WAC 332-I30. The drawing
shali include, but is not limited to, the fotlowing information:
1_ Proposed name of the short subdivision. (You
may wish to check with the City to make sure the
name of the short plat has not been taken yet_)
2. Location by section, township, range, and/or
other legal description.
3_ Name, address, and phone number of developer.
4_ Name, address, and phone number of each
property owner.
5. Name, address, and phone number of registered
land sturreyor.
5. Scale of drawing, north arrow, and date
(subsequent resubmittals must have a revision
date).
7. Existing topography of the land indicated by
contours of two foot intervaLs for slopes less
than 15 percent and five foot intervals for slopes
of 15 percent or greater. Vertical Datum
(NVGD-29 or KCAS).
8. Location and e�ent of significant naturai
feahues on and immediately adjaceat to the site.
Such features shall include but are not timited to
streams, wetlands, views, stands of trees, and
water bodies to the extent that significant natural
features and/or their associated buffers affect the
short subdivision.
9_ Comprehensive plan and zonin� classification of
the proposed shoR subdivision site and adjoining
properties.
10. Adjacent ownerships and the (and or tot divisions
of adjoining properties not in cocQmon
ownership for a distance of at least 100 feet
around the perimeter of the property proposed
for subdivision. A separate list of names may be
used for clarification purposes.
11. Locatioq widths, and names of existing or prior
streets, railroad, or utility rights-of-way or
easements, access easements, parks and other
public spaces, and existing permanent structures
to be retained within and adjacent to the
proposed shoR subdivision. Where the properly
has been previously subdivided, the origina( lots,
blocks, streets, easements, etc., shalt be shown
by dotted lines. Show distance between existing
structures to be retained and properry lines._
{Show pavement widths, planter strips,
sidewallcs, urility poles, etc_)
12. Existing and conceptually proposed water, sewer,
and drainage faciliries on, under, or over the
land showing size, grades, and locations.
13. Location and widths, and names of proposed
sh�eets, utility right-of-ways, and easements.
t4. Layout, number, lot sizes, and dimensions of
proposed lots. [nciude the square footage of each
lot.
1�
16.
t7
18
19.
20_
21_
22.
23.
24.
25.
Parcels of tand iniended to be dedicated for public
use, or reserved for use oEowners oPthe property in
the short subdivision.
A statement explaining how open space shatl be
provided. Eor a convenrional short subdivision,
open space in the amount of 15 percent of the �oss
(and area of the subdivision site is required to be
provided. If the City determines that the location,
quality, oc extent of the required open space would
not fulfill the intent or purpose. of useful common
open space, a paymeat of an equivatent fee-in-tieu
of the required project open space sha(t be paid
pursuant to FWRC L8S�.060(2).�
Total acreage of the site platted, prior to creation of
any tots, tracts, or other dedications.
Acreage precluded from development due to the
presence of criticat areas, inctuding: wettands,
streams, steep slopes, and other features (along with
buffers), broken out by category, covered by critical
areas re�ulations.
Acreage dedicated for public rights-of-way (for both
newly created streets and expansions of existina
streets), as well as private tracts, a(leys, and in�
e�ess and utilities easement created for the purpose
of providing access to lots within subdivisions_
Location and acreage of tracts (or other areas)
dedicated for retentioa/detention/drainage facitities,
open space and parks, or other on-site public
facilities, broken out by category.
Calculation of net p(at area, which is �oss plat area
minus critical areas, rights-of way, private open
space, and public purpose lands.'
Building setback (ines.
Typical roadway sections including streetli�ftts and
street trees (existic� and proposed)_
Vicinity map with labeled streets and north arrow.
Basis of bearing, statement of equipment and
procedures used, indication of perimeter boundary,
lot, and right-of-way tines with a notation of
bearings or azimuth &om the north, distances, and
curve dara, as well as the location and description of
all monuments, both found and set.
' Open space requirements for cottage housing, zero-lot line town house
development, and small lot detached development can be found in
FWRC 18.55_060.
Z Public purpose lamfs mean acreage of haccs (or other areas) dedicated
for retendon/detention/ drainage facilities, open space and parks, oc
othu on-site public facilities.
Bultetin #010 August 18, 2010 Page 4 of 5 k1E[andouts\Short Subdivision
26. Statement of equipment and procedures used_
27. Existina addresses, if app(icabie.
28. [ndication of perimeter bouadary, [ot, and right-
o� way tines witii a notation of bearings or
azimuth &om the north, distances, and curve
data.
29_ Location and description of alt monuments, both
found and set
30. The City's file number will be assigned upon
application. Include the file number on subsequent
resubmittals_
Bulletin #O10 —August t8, 2010 Page � of � k_�IlandoutslShort Subdivision
EXHIBIT C
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 18.35, "Preliminary Plat"
18.35.020 "Content and form of application"
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
Exhibit C
18.35.024 Content and form of application.
All preliminarv plat applications must at the minimum provide the
information contained within Bulletin #037. Preliminarv Plat Submittal
Requiremenfs. The submittal requirements are not intended to determine if an
applicafion conforms to citv of Federal Way codes. They are used only to
determined if all reuuired materials have been submitted. A code related review
will occur after a complete application has been submitted_ The director may
waive any sections determined to be not �easonably necessary.
�:rer�ree.en�e� ir� �4�e �nr�lii+.�}ii+n
� r
�h�� i� i�. n�n�e nn�-1 i+�rrn�� ror�ranon��++i�r� .�f �R�e I.�r�rl� .+nFr�.�1h e.��nro�ierl
r � �
E�E?S�FF�"6F�'
`iii\ Alnrr�o� �rlrlre�J nnrl n{��r�o r���mho���p�r��r_
... , r
/iail Al�w+e� �+r�rlronc�� •�nrl nL�nn� n� �ml�o�n � r+�PpK},�qyu��,
.�. �� ..'-
/v\ Al�mo �rlrl�o�c. �r�r7 r�h�ne m �mher �f ronic�}oro� I7nrI c� �nt�tt�L
r r •
� � -
inPot�t�Ic� F�r �I�r�a� le�� �l-»n 1 L'. r�ornan� r+n.-) f�r� f��} in�eni�+l� f�r �Ir�no� n£'1 �
f � a r
�
i � r
r���� �nrl �rlin:ninn nrnno.-I�ioc+
. - -
_ _ .. -
.�._ _ -- - - -
■ - - - - -
. _
. - - - - -
� - - - - - - - - - - -
- � - - - "
. _ _ - - - -
._ _ - _ -
. - - '
. - - - - _ - "
� - - - - _ _ - -
_ �� -
.. -
K�2009 Code Ame�ments�Submittal requvemena�Staff report\Currmt �tz&'report wich ezt�ibitslExhibits � B, C. D�ch�bit C- lB.liA20 Prdiminary Pla �bmittal teq.doc
��'_
i
t��'
� .
,
. '
,
(Ord. No. 09-610, § 3(Exh_ A), 4-7-09; Ord. No. 07-554, § 5{Exh. A(2)), 5-15-07;
Ord. No. 98-309, § 3, 1-6-98; Ord. No. 97-291, § 3, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 90-41,
§ 1(16_50), 2-27-90. Code 2001 § 20-111.)
K�2009 Code AmendmeMS\S�+bmittai roquiremrnMStaff repat�Currmt staff repat with arhibita�Ezltibits .� 6. C. D�E�ibit C- i 6.35.02Q Proliminary PIa �bieanl req.doc
EXHIBIT D
EXHIBIT TO PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (�WRC) Title 18.35, "Preliminary Plat":
Bulletin #037 - Preliminary Plat Submittal Requirements
{City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
�
arv oF �
��deral U1Iay
DEPAKT�[EIVT OF CObL�[UNffY DE VELOPMEYC
SERVICES
3332� 8`� Avenue South
PO Box 9718
Eedera! Way WA 98063-9718
253-835-2607; Eax 253-83�-2609
www.citvoffederalwav.com
Preliminary Plat Submittai Requirements
PURPOSE
A preliminary plat application ailows the division or re-division of (and into ten or more lots for the
purpose of saie, tease, or transfer of ownership. A pre(iminary ptat may be a conventional or cluster
subdivision, cottage housing, zero-lot line townhouse development, or smatl lot detached devetopment of
ten or more lots_ A final plat must be approved and recorded before newly created tots may be tegally sold.
(Refer to Final Plats Submittal Requirements handout for inPormation on final plats.)
HOW TO APPLY
The applicant (owner or owner's appointed agent) fcles a complete application with the Department of
Community Development Services using the Master Land Use Apptication form availai�(e at the
department (and on our website, www.cityoffederalway.com). The applicant also provides any information
or material as specified in the provisions of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) describing the
decision applied for and any additional iaformation or materiat that the director determines is reasonably
necessary for a decision on the matter. Ptease refer to the following "Submittal Requirements" section to
determine the materials that must be submitted to be considered a complete pretiminary plat application.
PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE
Applicants are required to schedule a pceapplication conference to become familiar with FWRC
requirements, poticies, and regulations. It is also an opportunity to coordinate with City departments and
obtain their comments on the proposed subdivision. Refer to the City's preapplicatian conference handout
for information on preapplication conferences_
WHO MAKES THE DECtS10N
The City Council makes the decision on the preiiminary plat based on a recommendation from the Hearing
Examiner, who ho(ds the pubtic heacing. The preliminary p(at apptication is processed under the provisions
of Chapter 18.35 FWRC, "Prel�minary Plat" Your application will be evaluated on the basis of the
information you provide, the criteria listed in the pertinent sections of the City's regulations, and inspection
of the property. Preliminary plats shall be designed to the standards of FWRC 18_SS.d10 to 080, and
1$.60.030 to 120.
COMPUANCE WRH SEPA �
Preliminary plats are subjecT to the R/ashington State Environmenta.l Policy Act (SEPA). For a detai[ed
explanation of the City's environmental policy, refer to FWRC Title 14.
CRITICAL AREAS
Projects that involve work within critical areas {e_g., wetlands, streams, steep sloQes, and [akes) may
require that the City contract out for expert technical assistance. Pursuant to FWRC 14.150.030, the
app(icant is responsible for providing any information, mapping, studies, and materials, and for paying far
inspections or review by a qua.lified professional acceptable to the City. You will be advised at the earliest
possible point if your project will be subject to these types of expenses.
SHORELINES
Subdivision that are within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mazk of Puget Sound, Steel Lake, North
Lake, or Lake Kilarney require review under the city's Shoreline Master Progracn. Applicants should speak
with department stafffor further information regarding shoreline regulations prior to submitting a formal
app(ication.
tc:�zooe coa� a�«,am�c��s�n�c� rey�«��s�a'r�c�u sr,�� �����c� �a s. c. o�na�c n- e�u�n os� ear�y �a«
TRAFfIC RELATED REQUIREMENTS
All preliminary plats are subject to transportation concurrency and Traffic Impact Fee requirements. Refer
to the concurrency information and T'raffic Impact Fee handouts for additional information_
APPEALS
Any decision on a preliminary plat can be appealed to King County Superior Court. See FWRC 1835210,
for detailed information regarding appeals of preliminary plat decisions.
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
A complete application is required before the City can proceed with technical analysis and make a
recommendation to the Hearing Examiner on your application. All checked items must be submitted to
constitute a complete application. Please note that a complete application does not imply compliance or
conformance with applicable codes. Please do not turn in your application until all items on the list that
apply to your proposal have been included. Consult with the Department of Community Development
Services if you have a question. All application materials become public information.
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Required Submitted
A. Completed Master Land Use Application form including signature of persons with
ownership interest in the property. Agent authorization is required if application is not
signed bv owners of a(1 subject parcels._
' Cf; �� '�`.� :� B. All application fees including preliminary plat and SEPA fees.
rt -:` C. Two copies of a current title report or piat certificate, prepared within the last 90 days,
�� � < (including any easements or restrictions affecting the properties with a description,
- purpose, and reference by auditor's file number and/or recording number; parties of
interest; and anv restrictions or covenants runnin with the ro e.)
` Y ' : D. A copy of the current King County Assessor's quarter section map for the area identifying
�� ��� ��CC� ' all properties within 300 feet of the proposed subdivision. (These maps can be found at
metrokc gov )
� �
�
'1 E. One 1 t x l 7 reduced copy of the preliminary plat map.
IC�
Notice of avaitability from the purveyor(s) of sewer and water signed within a year of the
date of preliminary plat application.
�
�� -� .�
°�
;� ��:
_ � �.:x
r� ,�. ,��
G
Copy of the preapplication summary letter.
H. Four copies of the project's Preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR) per the 2009
King County• Sz�rface Water Design Manual (KCS WDM). The TIR must include a Lev�:l I
downstream analysis and must address relevance of the 8 Core and 5 Special Requirements
ofthe KCSWDM.
I. Four copies of critical areas studies, (i.e., geotechnical study, wetland delineation, wetland
mitigation, stream delineation, classification, critical aquifer recharge and wellhead
nrotection areas inventorv, etc.)
Four copies of a School Access Analysis.
K. Four copies of special studies or requirements as requested in your preapplication
summarv letter. _ _
� "` '<; L. Four copies of Trip Generation or Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), prepared by an engineer
�� :z +;�
�� �, �- licensed in the State of Washington, as required by the Traffic Division.
Bulletin #010 — August 18, 2010 Page 2 of 4 k:�f-Iandouts\Short Subdivision
'" '-��' `� �.°: M. Seven copies of a landscape plan prepared by a(icensed (andscape architect identifyin�
��Z -<�" - w ` ` existing wooded areas, meadows, rock outcroppings, proposed and required buffers, open
��...
r -," spaces, street trees, omamental landscaping, other landscape features, and stands of trees
��,;. and rotection techni ues as ma be re uired er the FWRC.
N. Seven copies of a pretiminary clearing and grading and treeJvegetation retention plan
- consistent with Chapter 29. t20.040 FWRC, Clearing, Grading and Tree and Veaetation
Retentioa
" �� O. Seven copies of a property survey in confocmance with FWRC t8_3S_020(2), stamped by a
:� :, licensed land surve or.
; P. Seven copies, as appiicable, of a phasing plan showing divisions of the plat and a proposed
timetable for cons�ction of each divisioa
' Q. Seven copies of a proposed prelirninary plat drawn to scale of t" = 100' or larger ( t:�0 is
'' �- preferred), which includes the Preliminary Plat Drawing Requirements listed on Page � of
� _�y- _ this handout.
� R Additional information as required by the Community Devetopment Services and/or Pubtic
Works De artments.
Notice Requirements
-� Preliminary Plat - A list of the names and addresses of all owners of real property, as shown
by the records of the county assessors tocated within 300 feet of any portion of the boundary
� y of the proposed subdivision and any adjouung real properties owned by the owners of the Land
'�' . proposed to be subdivided. if the owner of the property which is proposed to be subdivided
i�
_; owns adjacent properly, the addresses of owners of property located within 300 feet of any
- portion of the boundaries of such adjacently located parcels must also be provided. Two sets
of stamped envelopes with address labels for all owners described above.
� SEPA — Provide one set of self-addressed, stamped business sized envelopes (with City of
��;" s' � Federa.l Way return address) of persons receivina property tax statements for all proQerties
�.-..=, . <
,� within 300 feet of the boundary of the subject property. [nclude a separate list of the addresses
�� �� °'=�� with their pazcel numbers and an assessor's map showing the 300-foot boundary.
:��' �;,
- �=� :�
� ' :.' -
,�,,,_ s .
a �� �� ��, � � � �;:
_,_`�",��� '� � IMPORTANT — Please do not submit metered envelopes. The Federa( Way Post
-�:_� ` �:._ ,
�� ;�.� Office may refuse such envelopes. In addition, you are highly encouraged to use the
;'"`�
a �. -�.-:. �,,� � = Forever stamps.
. _.. ��'''-'`� ....��. _ _�:�s
Bulletin #010 — August 18, 2010 Page 3 of 4 k_�EIandouts\ShoR Subdivision
PREUMINARY PLAT DRAWING REQUIREMENTS
The preliminary plat drawinD shall include, but is not limited to, the fottowing informarion:
t_ Proposed nacne of subdivision. (You may wish to
check with King County to make sure that the
name of your plat has not yet been used.)
2. Locarion by section/cownship/range and legal
description.
3_ Name, address, and phone number of the
devetoper.
4_ Name, address, and phoae number of each
propecty owaer.
5. Name, address, and phone number of registered
tand surveyor.
6. Scale of plat, date, and north arrow (subsequent
resubmittals must have a revision date).
7. Existing topography of the land indicated by
contours of two-foot intervals for slopes less than
t� percent and five-foot intervals for slopes of 15
percent or greater_ [dentify ail siopes 40 percent or
greater on or within 2� feet of the site.
8. Locatioa and extent oEsignificant nativat features
on and adjacent to the site. Suck features include
streams, wetlands, views, stands of trees, water
bodies, to the extent that the significant nat�ral
feature and/or their associated buffers affect the
proposed p(at.
9_ Comprehensive plan and zoning classifications of
subject and adjoining properties.
l0. Adjacent common ownerships and the land or lot
divisions of adjoining properties not in common
ownersiup for a distance of at least L00 feet around
the perimeter of the property proposed for the
subdivision. A separate list of names may be used
for clarificarion purposes_
I 1_ Location, widtt►s, and names of existing or prior
platted streets; railroad, or utility rights-of-way or
easemenu; parks or other public spaces; and
existing permanent structures to be retained within
and adjacent to the proposed subdivision. Where
the property has been previously subdivided, �e
oriaina( (ots, blocics, street easements, etc., shall be
shown in dotted lines in scale with the proposed
subdivision. Show distance between existing
structuces to be retained and property lines. (Show
pavement widths, planter strips, sidewalks, utility
potes, etc.)
l2_ Existing and conceptually proposed water, sewer,
and drainage utiGties on, under, or over the land
showing size, grades, and locatioa
l3_ Locations and widths of proposed streets, utiGty
ri;hts-of-way and easements.
14_ Layout, number, and dimensions of proposed lot�
tnc(ude the square footage of each lot
l�_ Parcets of !and intended to be dedicated forpublic
use, or reserved for the use of owners of the
property in the subdivision.
16. Building setback lines_
17. The tocation of a!1 ditcl��s, culvects, �atch basins,
and other parts of the design for the condrol of
sucface water drainage.
18. Typical roadway sections, eacisting and proposed,
including streetlights and street [rees_
19_ A statement explaining how open space shall be
provided. Eor conventional subdivisioas, open
space in the amount of 15 percent of the gross land
area of the subdivision site is required to be
provided if the City deternunes that the location,
quality, or extent of the required open space would
not fulfill the intent or purpose of useful common
open space, a payment of an equivalent fee-in-lieu
of the required project open space shatl be paid
pursuant to FWRC t8.5�.060(2).�
20. Total acreage of the site platted, prior to creation
of any lots, tracts, or other dedications.
2t. Acreage prectuded &om development due to the
presence of critical areas, including: wetlands,
sireams, steep slopes, and other featiu�es (atong
with buffers), broken out by category, covered by
crirical areas reaularions.
22. Acreage dedicated for public rights-of-way (for
both newly created streets and expansions of
existing streets), as well as private tracts, aileys,
and ingresslegress and uritities easement created
for the purpose of providing access to lots within
subdivisions.
23. Location and acrea�e o f tracts (or other areas)
dedicated for retention/detention/dra.inage
facilities, open space and parks, or other on-site
public facilities, broken out by category.
24_ Net plat area, which is gross piat area minus
critical areas, rights-of-way, private open sQace,
and public purpose 1ands.
Z5. Vicinity map with labeled streets and north arrow
showing the proposed subdivision's relation to the
area.
26. List the height of all retaining walls and rockeries.
27. The City's file number will be assigned upon
application. Include the file number on subsequent
resubmittals.
` Op� space requirements for cottage housing, uro-lot liae town
house deve(opment, and smal( tot detached development can be found
in FWRC 18_55_060.
Z Public prvpose krnd.s meaa acreage of tracts (or other areas)
dedicated for retention/detention/drainage fac�lities, ope� space and
parks, or other on-site pubtic facilities. -
Bultetin #010 — Augusi 18, 2010 Page 4 of 4 k:�E[andoutslShort Subdivision
EXHIBIT E
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (F WRC) Chapter 19.15 "Pertnits and Review
Processes"
19.15.040 "Development application submittal requirements"
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
Exhibit E
_ - _ - ----- - - ---- - - - - --- __ _ __
19.15.040 Development application submittai requirements.
Ali use process I, I1. III and IV applications Rfe}es�s w#i^" �°^. "���
s�i�ed must at the minimum provide the informa6on contained within Builetin
#053, DeveloQment Requirements for Process l. Builetin #054, Development
Revuirements for Process // or B�alletin #001 Deve%pment Requirements
Handout for Process 11! or IV dependinct on the particular Use Process beinq
applied for. The submittal requirements are not intended to determine if an
application conforms to city of Federal Way codes_ They are used only to
deteRnine if all required materials have been submitted. A code-retated review
will occur after a complete application has been submitted. The director may
waive any sections determined to be not reasonably necessary.
.,� +w:� �e,.��.,., •
/1� wrl.�c.�c.rl.�r�r1 ��ne �nnli�+��ie�n_
M\ A.,.,I:...,+:.,., fee� �+e. �e� �� i� in fL�e .�rl�nfoe�fe�+ �+rrlin..n..e
.... .,. .. ..... ..... ... ..... ._.,... ..... _._...�..___
. �
�
!"�. .:.�va�vc�c�c°�':
}he r�r�.�orfir �sii�4�ir� �l+o I�rner �re�
afA �J / - .
/7\ T�.i.� ��r�ioe� .�f r� �rren� �i�Ie ror��rF f�r �� rhiorF cir�+r+erF�i
�,-�..vc,., ... ,.�,,....,... ....� .�- .,.. .,...,�,�,., r ..., r .,.�..�.
, ,
�
� .
nr+n�en�c• i+f er.nF+ "f +he�o r+l�n� i� �+���+ilnhlo nF fl^�o rlonorl�ev�qa.�.
h��ilr/in� , � , 1 �i.-. ' m��e.� 4, o .�� �he� ��rr��cM��
a�Ziivmg .7"n'rc7G7ttJcZ.i�a��.�. Rrri�:
f �
•+i� •..r esn.�rirsoorinn �F inni� `?fl_f�� ;
� ,
> > > � �
�
, e � t
� rfifie.J M re.4�i+�i.� '+r ennineer LUo�..rrllee.Z �F �4�0 .'...���.� �F *he �o�tol�r�=eTr
...,..�.. . �-, ...�.�. ... .� .�. ..�.�. . ..��.........�.... ... -r - - - — -
K12009 Code.�madment0.Submittai requirm�entslStaff repott�Cucrent staffrcpart with adubitslE�dtibits E. E C+. H. [ aod IlF�ibii E- revised t9.I5.040.doc
��F�E6�
� ` � , , „
r»� � 4 he roFe�onnr�rl nn �he �i�e r+l�
.. ... .... ..... .... r ...._.._
� � -
� µ 11
� ,
�
D ' +li i-�![ic� - cc } RT` �T''c(u`r
� '
�eF�-�a'�=
{�'����'
���':
(Ord. No. 09-610, § 3(Exh. A), 4-7-09; Ord. No. 09-594, § 18, 1-6-09; Ord. No.
"97-291, § 3, 4-1-97. Code 2001 § 22-33.) _
[C\2009 Code AmendmentslSubmittal requiremmts\Staff roportlCurrrnt �aff cepat with ezhibitslExhibits E, F G. E[. I md J�Exhibit E-�evised 19.15.040.doc
EXHIBIT F
EXHIBIT TO PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (F WRC) Title 19.15,
"Permits and Review Processes"
Bulletin #053 -
Development Reauirements for Process I— DiYectoYS AppYOVCZZ
(City File No. 10- i 02132-00-UP)
�
CiTY OF
������� ���
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUN[TY DEVELOPMENT SERV[CES
3332� 8`� Avenue South
PO Sox 97(8
Federal Way WA 98�63-9718
2�3-83�-2607;Fax 253-83�-2609
tivt+nv.citvo ffederalway_com
DEVE�.OPMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR PROCESS !
Director's Approval
Project Name:
Pro}ect Description:
Appticar�t/Agent
�ite Nots):
• This form is to be used by an applicant as a guide in determining what constitutes a comp(ete
application for Process I, Directors Approval.
• All checked items must be submitted to constitute a complete app(ication_
• Process I applications that contain all checked items will be determined complete at intake.
The appticant or agent witl be notified immediately if an application is considered complete.
• A comp(ete application does not imply compliance or conformance with appticable codes.
�������e�tc�'�or�,���E: -
How To APP�r
The appticant (ownec or owaer's appointed agent) must file the fo(lowing items:
uired Submitted
0: Q A. Master Land Use Application, with owner's signature
� Q
Q Q
p° Q
B_ A detailed narrative description of the project, on a separate 8'/z x 11 sheet
C_ Six (folded) copies of the site ptan
D_ Application fees
If the project involves a new structure or changes to the exterior of an existing structure, also provide:
R uired Submitted
� O E. Six (fo(ded) copies of existing and proposed building e(evations
� � F_ Color & materials indicatocs (color photos or color board and materials sample)
K.�20Q9 Code Amendmenrs�Submittal requirementslStaff report\Current staff report with exhibits�Exhibits E, F G, I-t, [ and
l�Exhibit F- Bulletin 0�3 Process I Development Requirements_doc
WNEN USE PROCESS I IS USED
Reference to Process [ is found in various ptaces in the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC), indicating
that certain deve[opment, activities, uses, or interpretations are permitted only if approved using Process I.
Any Process I applieation that is not exempt from the requirements of the State Erivironmental Policy Act
(SEPA) will be reviewed using the procedural requirements of Process QI. See FWRC Title L9, Chapter
55, for a detailed explanarion of Process L
WHO MAKES THE DECISION
Under Process I, the Director of Community Development Services makes the decision based on review
and analysis of decisional criteria and the o�icial file. See FWRC 19.5�.010 for decisional criteria.
APPEALS
Any decision issued by the director can be appealed. Appeals of Process I, Director's Decision, are decided
by the City of Federa( Way Hearing Examiner after a public hearing. See FWRC t9.55.050 for deta.iled
information regarding appeals of Process I decisions.
� ���. f _�� � ., ����, �p. �r., -M. _�._ j ...-�.' .3 . . . - ��. .:3
. ..r
� Qt1� . � � �PLI�`�'E��7�F�`� w �t � ;�
�`°�.��__��._ . _. ���� _ ... _.�a�S _._ _ � ._._ �,..�.,,,�.:�� •
_ ..,
' Please eogsictec tEiis as: a Notice o� ContpleteQess
As e�f �:2Q"� ,� ��is P'rocess T ap�t�catea� ts"d�te�ninect' te: 6e
co�ple�� 6ased Qn:the m�i�m s�b��f�a� req�tirements
�� -
L�e�iew a�t�te pceiject v�r��- begcn upot�:aPlitica.tioa assig�ent The City of-�eder�t:R/ap �itt
�e�ac�t�� � tEte ag�(ic�.tion u�xt �Cte t�iaE a[I appticable rec��i�ements are .
met`P�ease°no��.tfiat �ily vssti� �ie 1`iatted-at any�Eiine Gify sta€�ceq�ests �dditionaE'
ut€�a�t� ; _ .-. ` -: : ,
c��R� � .. r_ . -,. .v ..... . . . . . .. .. .. .._- _ _� . - ��le:-= ., . =.�...,. -_
Sulletin #0�3 — August l8, 20(0 Page 2 of 2 k�E[andouts�Process [ Development Requirements
EXHIBIT G
EXHIBIT TO PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19.15,
"Permits and Review Processes"
Bulletin #054:
"Development Requirements for Process II — Site Plan Review"
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
�
CITY OF
�� � i.� �i.+! � V Y ��
DEPARTMEYI' OF COMhiUN[TY DEVELOPMENT SERViCES
3332� 8`� Avenue South
PO Box 9718
Fedecat Way WA 98063-9� l8
253-83�-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
www.citvoffederalwav.com
DEVElOPMENT REG2UIREMENTS FOR PR�CESS II
Project Name:
P�oject Descfiption:
Appticant/Ageni:
Fie No{s):
SrrE Pr.aN REVrEw
• T'his form is to be used by an applicant as a guide in determining what consritutes a complete
application for Process II, Site Plan Review.
• All checked items must be submitted to constitute a complete application.
• Process II applications that conta.in all checked items wiil be determined comptete at intake_ The
appticant or agent will be norifed immediate(y if an application is considered complete.
• A complete application does not imp(y compliance or conformance with appticabie codes.
Process tt Submitfal Checklist
K12009 Cade AmadmenulSubmiwt tequicemmts�Snff report\Cuaea �a@'repoa wirh exlubialExiubit3 � F G. K I and 1�Exhibit G- Process Q Devdopment &eqs poot fo�macdoc
General Plan Standards for Process II
• Eight complete anc! fo(ded sets of drawings (fo(ded to 9 x 12 inches).
• Minimum plan sheet size shalt be 24 x 36 inches_
• Plans must be drawn at an engineering sca(e that allows the entire plan to fit on one sheet
• Minimum scale is 1:20 unless otherwise authorized.
• All information is to be legible.
• Plans shall be prepared by a certified professional (ticensed in the state of V�/ashino on) unless
otherwise authorized. Note: If the develo�ment proposal has a vatue of $7� 000 or �reater, the site
survey sit�lan preliminaiydrainag�adin� ri�ht-of-wav p(ans and bui(dina e (evation plan shall
be pre�ared bv a certifted professionat licensed in the state of Washin�ton. The survev shall be
pre�ared bv a certified (and surv�or and the site plan draina¢e aradin� ri�ht-of-wav plans, and
buitding etevations bv a certified azchitect or en�ineer Rega�rdless of the vatue of the development,
landscape nlans must be.pre�ared by a Washin�ton State licensed tandscaoe arch�tect
. � �1 _
1
_;:::��
Submitted
C�,: .
H.
3 • Property lines, utilities, easements, sidewallcs, street edges, eacisting structures, parking,
and site improvements (e.g. drainage systems with pipe sizes, invect and rim
e(evations)
• Structures and driveways within i5fl feet of subject site (on both sides of street)
• Minimum two foot contours for slopes tess than I� percent and Hve foot contours for
slopes 15 percent or greater, datum shall be King County Aenal Survey or NGVD-29
• Delineate slopes �reater than 40 percent grade on or within 25 feet of the site
• Delineate streams, ponds, wetlands, natucat drainage courses, and other surface water
features on or within 200 feet of the site per Federa! Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title
14, Chapter 30, "Critical Areas"
• Identifv trees defined bv FWRC L9A�_200
Topographic survey
• Project name, ptan date, and/or revision date(s)
• Name, phone number, and license stamp of prepazer
• North arraw and baz scale
• Site area
Bulletin #0�4 — August 18, 2010 Page 2 of 6 k:/Handouts/Process II Development Requirements
K1?009 Code Am�asLSubwtnl requvemausl5caff reportlCurrem �ad'repott wirh adubi[s�Exh�bicc � F G. K( a� 1�Fzhibit G- Proccsc Q Devdopment Reqs poor fomutdoe
Q - E� .: -
- _ � :: _.
_ .; -
�,. ;:,:
- _ =;�;.�--
� =�=`.
��
�-,� `::
3 a ��:u :
:0 F� °: :
�
I. Site plan
+ project aame, plan date, and/or revisioa date�s)
• Name and phone number of owneda�ent
• Nacne, phone number, and ticense stamp oEpreparer
• North arrow and bar scale
• Vicinity map
• S ite area
• Total parking statl count
• Total goss floor area of all proposed floors or levels
• Location and d'�nensions of existing/proposed structures, property lines, sidewalks,
easements, parking layout, street edges, mechanical equipment, trash enclosures,
outdoor uses, storage areas, fencin�, rockeries, and retaining wal(s
• Existing streams, ponds, wetlands, natural drainage courses, and other surface water
features on or within 200 feet ofsite per FWRC Title 14, Chapter 30, "Critical Areas"
• Location ofstands of trees as defined by FWRC t9_05.200
• Existing and proposed utilities including: utility poles and boxes, water, storm sewer,
sanitary sewer, and fire hydrants
• Structures and driveways within l50 feet of subject site (on both sides of street)
• IBC construction type and occupancy classification
� Location and square footage catculations of any on-site pedestrian areas (i.e., plazas,
courtyards) or open space areas
• Show locarion and calculate acreage nrecluded &om development due to the nresence
of critical areas includin��wetlands streams steep slopes. and other features (along
with buffers) broken out by cate�orv covered by criticat areas reeulations. as
applicable.
• Show location and ca(culate acreaee dedicated for aublic riQhts-of-wa�for both newlv
created streets and ex�ansions of existin� streets) as well as private tracts, allevs, and
in�ess/e� and utilities easement broken out bv cateaorv.
• Show location and calcutate acrea;e oPtracts (or other areasl dedicated or set aside for
retention/detentionldrainage facilities o�en s�ace or other on-site public facitities.
broken out b ��cateQorv.
• Provide net site area which is �zoss area minus critica( areas. riehts-of-wav. �rivate
_ ___ _—___ __J'"'LI"_ _"'____ I..�J,. �
J. Preliminary drainage, grading, and right-of-way plan
• Project name, pian date, and/or revision date(s)
• Name, phone number, and (icense stamp of preparer
• North arrow and bar scale
• Preliminary storm drainage system in accordance with the 2009 King County Surface
Water Design Manua[ (KCSWDM) as amended by Federal Way
• Preliminary �ading plan with finished contours; minimum two foot contours for slopes
less than l� percent and 6ve foot contours for slopes 1� percent or �eater, datum shall
be King County Aerial Survey or NGVD-29
• Preliminary right-of-way icnprovement plan, as required by the Pubtic Works Dept
• Approximate cut & fill quantities of site earthwork
• Totat existing and proposed impervious surface area
• Eacisting and proposed utilities including: utility poles and boxes, water, storm sewer,
sanitarv sewer_ and fire hvdcants _
� Public pwpose lands mean acreage of tracts (or other areas) dedicated for retention/detention/drainage faci(ities, open space and
parks, or other on-site public facilities.
Bulletin #0�4 — August 18, 2010 Page 3 of 6 k:/Handouts/Process tt Devetopment Requiremenks
K:�2009 Code Aa�admasslSubmittal requvemem.s�SwFrcport�Cwrau staff report with e�ibiml£xlubvs E. F G. K[ and PF.xlubi� G- Pzocess [I Devdopmen[ Reqs poor fomiat.doc
K. Preliminary landscape plan
E�. �- • Project name, plan date, and/or revision date(s)
• Name, phone number, and license stamp oEpreparer
• North arrow and bar scate
• Specific location, type, size, and number of trees to remain and to be removed
• Plant schedule with the scientific name, common name, size, spacing, and quantity of
each
• Specific location and square footage ca(cu(ations of drou�ht tolerant landscaping
- (document that a minimum 35 percent is provided per FWRC l9. i25.040[6])
• [rriaation plan for lawn areas
• Specific location, square footage calculations, and tota( squace footage of each parking
. � lot landscape is(and per FWRC l9_ 12�.070(2)(a)
• Screening of outdooc facilities such as: trash/recyctinj enclosures, outdoor stora�e,
drive through faciiities, stormwater faciliries, and �ound based mechanicat equipment
-_ • Building wali area landscaping per EWRC 19_ 12�A40
� • Specific tocation of street trees in the right-of-way
�� ;:� • Identi erimeter landsc e e as I, II, or tII
i L. Building elevations
��" '��- ' • Project name, plan date, and/or revision date(s)
.� x � y �� � • Name, phone number, aad iicense stamp of preparer
� ;;_ �. • Bar scale
- �' y fi= � • Statement of architecturat design intent, finish materials, and colors
_ �; �,.;,��.;�;' ;; • Front, rear, and side (labeled as north, south, east, and west) building elevations of
" ,�, ; : . proposed structures
�s _
Y � Exterior wall o enin
,,
,� _, °f" ;�s•-. • P 1�
�� • Exterior materials and co(ors board
- - • Garbage/recycling facility screen details
• (Zoof-top and ground based mechanical equipment screen details
• Buitdin� hei t catculation
- M. ClearinQ and �radin�plan
� Q • Project name, plan c3ate. and/or revision date(s).
- + Name, phone number. and license stamp of preparer.
• North arrow and baz scale.
• [dentification of existing slope depictin� areas with 0°/a to 1�% slope; areas with L�%
_ to 40% slope; and areas of 40% or ;reater sto�e.
+ Proposed �ades.
'_ • Location of all existine and/or proposed structures drivewavs rieht-of-wav
improvements, utilities. and easements on the subject propertv.
• Desi�ation of all wet(ands stceams and other critical areas that are on or within 300
: feet of any area proposed to be disturbed by the proposed ctearin� and/or �adina
action
- • Areas proposed for clearine and the proposed use for such are_as.
• An�pro�osed srade changes that adverseiv affect or endanger trees on the propertv _
and/or adiacent properties. and specifications to maintain them.
• A minimum of two cross secrions of the site drawn to scale depictin� the existina and
proposed �ade and anyproposed rockeries and/or retaining walls. The director mav
also reauire a three dimensional topo�ravhic mode( of existin� and �roposed
_ _ topographic conditions.
- • Location and descri,ption of proaosed erosion contro[ devices and structures.
• When required a�eotechnical report. prepared by a geotechnicat enaineer that
- _ contains sufficient information to determine thepotential im�acts of the proposed
- ctearin�and ading, as well as proposed measures to reduce or etiminate these
im acts_
Bu(letin #0�4 —August 18, 20 L0 Page 4 of 6 k:lHandouts/Process tt Development Requiremenu
K12009 Code Amm�tW requvaaeotslScaff reportu'.�urarc snff+cQat wab adriti�Exlnbics E. F f.. EC [ and AF.xtubi[ G- Process Q Oevdopue� Reqs Poar fofmacdoe
Q 0
N. TreeNeyetation [Zetention Plan
• Project name plan date and/or revision date(s).
• Name nhone number and license stamQ of �re�arer who shalt be a certified arborist_
or a certified (andsca�e architect.
• North arrow and bar sca(e.
• Statement outlinin� t,_he�urposes of any_proaosed tree removal (e.a.. bui(dinQ
construc[ion street or roadwa� driveway recreation area patio or oarkina lot),
toeether with a pro�osed timetable for when this work wilt occur__
• A tree survey that idenrifies the tocation approximate size soecies. and number of
trees on this site and also identifies the general location of trees within 50 feet of the
site `Cree survey sam�les mav onlv be used at the discretion of die director._
• A depicrion of the spatial limits for tree/vegetation retention areas and details of
tree/veaetation protection measures.
• A depiction of an�new veQetated areas to be established.
• The manner in wiuch the cleared areas on the property will be reclaimed with
veQetation s�ecification or anY required miti�ation p(antin�s and a timetable for
replanting_
• Approved tree/ve;etation retention plan shall be incorporated into the clearin� and
Bu(letin #0�4 - August 18, 2010 Page 5 of b k./Handouts/Process I[ Deve(opment [tequirements
K.V.069 Code Amendments\Submittal requirements4Staff reportlCuvent staff report with e.chibits'�Exhibits E, F G, H, I and 1�E!chibit G- Proces> ([ Development Reqs poor fortnatdoc
Re uired Submitted
� �
� E� ❑
■
■
�
_�
:❑
❑
❑
�
:❑
: u
�
�
a
_ C C ]
� ,: ❑
�, ❑ -
Special studies and additional information for Process 11.
Please provide FOUR copies of the following:
Level One Downstream storm drainage analysis as described in the KCSWDM as
amended by Federal Way
Preliminary technical information report addressing relevance of the 8 Core and 5
Special Requirements of the KCS WDM
Trip generation analysis prepared by an engineer licensed in State of Washington
Concurrency application prepared by an engineer licensed in State of Washington
Traffic impact anaiysis prepared by an engineer licensed in State of Washington
Parking study as required by the Traff'ic Division
Noise study
Lighting plan
Geotechnical study
Wetland delineation report
Wetland mitigation plan
Stream delineation and classification report
Critical aquifer recharge & wellhead protection areas information/inventory
Other information relating to design and siting of proposed development (including
site cross sections)
Specific information to determine compliance with city goals, policies, and regulations
Piease cansiderthis,as a No�ice of Gompleteness.
r{�
_ . ' �` �: - deterrriined to be �amplete basec� on
�� , 20t,: ,,; ����s Proeess II �PP �a4 icm,ts� _
���e�e�fs:
i � ; � . � ;� ` .�. ' �
��po� ag�siication �.ssign�nen� The C�ty o€ �ederal Way will take action on the
��c� tfiiaC-�all'applieatiie reE}u�rements'aFe�?et: �'�ease note that C�ty review w�tl be halted
S��ic��h�nal ,in�Q�tatiot�,
,
� s �� . < � �
Title:
�. �
£ -
. � _ , -
, . �_ ,.r. � �
�
x
3� TEiE:LAND'Lk�E APPtiIGATION. �4 CAPY f1F,THIS AIOTICE SHt1f}L BE.FRClNIDE�),`FO TI�
,�. . � � � ; ,,.
� iAPPLIGA'l'If31<I.. t; ` " ° ` _
Bulletin #054 — August 18, 2010 Page b of 6 k:/Handouts/Process tI Development Requirements
EXHIBIT H
EXHIBIT TO PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC} Title 19.15,
"Permits and Review Processes"
Bulletin #001 - Development Reauirements:
Process III (Project Approval) or Process IV (Hearing Examiner Approval)
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
�
CITY OF
�e��r�� �a�
DEP�ltThtEYT OF CO,tiibi[JN[TY DEVELOPMEYTSERVICES
3332� 8`� Avenue South
PO Box 9718
Federal Way WA 98063-9718
253-83�-2607; Eax 2�3-83�-2609
w�vw.citvoffederalwav. com
�� Y ������lV� ������������
❑ PROCESS III (PROJECT APPROVAL�
❑ PROCESS (V (HEARfNG EXAMINER APPROVAL�
Name:
File No(s):
• This form is to be used by an app(icant as a juide in determinina what constitutes a complete application.
• All checked items must be submitted to constitute a complete application.
• Applicant witt be notified of a comp(ete application within 28 days.
• A complete app(ication does not imply comptiance or conformance with applicable codes_
• Additionat fees may be required for consultant review of critical areas.
General Plan Standards
• Eight complete and folded sets of drawings (folded to 9 x 12 inches).
• Minimum plan sheet size shatl be 24 x 36 inches.
• Plans must be drawn at an engineering scale that altows the entire plan to fit on one sheet.
• Minicnum scate is 1 to 20 unless otherwise authorized_
• All information is to be legible.
• Plans shall be prepazed by a certified professionat (licensed in the state of Washina on) unless othenvise authorized.
• if the deve(opment proposat has a value of $75.000 or greater, the site survey, site p(an, preliminarv drainage. gradin�
right-of-wayplans and building elevation p(ans shall be prepared by_a certifiedprofessional licensed in the state of
Washin�ton The survey shall be prepared bv a certified land surveyor and the site �tan draina�e arading, right-of-wa�
plans, and buitding elevations bv a certified architect or en�ineer. Re�azdless of the value of the developmen� iandscape
plans must be_prepared bv a Washin� on State iicensed tandscape architect.
Re uired Submitted
;� ��: = A. Completed Master Land Use application, with owner's si�ature
�,C� ,-. Q v: 8. Application fees includin�SEPA fees as appticable_
; E� .-, �;.; �` C. Copy of entire undertying p(at or King County Assessor's parcet map
� �., Q:: D. Vicinity map on separate 8% x t 1 sheet
� �` �;;' E. Two copies ofcurrent tit(e report for subject property
a ��- F. Two copies of current letters of water and sewer availability (only required for vacant
,��3, �� ro e
�.. a� � �,�; G. Eight copies of site photographs from each compass point (north, east, south, & west)
.� ��'� = referenced on the site ptan
- - :�,.;
,� r ;
� � :' � � ' H. Concurrency application
Bulletin #001 —August l8, 20i0 Page t of � k:/E[andouts/Devetopment Requirements
K:�2009 Code Ammda�entclSubmittat rcquiremarcslStaff tepat\Curtmt shff report vnth exlu'bitslEz(nbits H. F G. EC [ 3nd J1Exlvbi[ H- Devdopmem Reqwranm�s poor formazung.dac
Re uired Submitted
;� Q .
� a;' -
��� � �; �
��� , �
�.u'�"� � r � � ._
e"'� .�,; , + J'R
�' ��.�; �. �c
� � �-� ;" ~v
� � �
:` � �
� ;,
x� . � �' -
� �� � �
� � � t �...�
�#i� �" -
�a..�� -
I. Topographic Survey
• Project name, plan date, andJor revision date(s)
• Name, phone number, and licerue stamp of preparer
• North arrow and bar sca(e
• Site area
• Property lines, utilities, easements, sidewaiks, street edges, existina structures, parking, and
site improvements (i.e. drainage systems with pipe sizes, invert and rim etevations, etc)
• Structures and driveways within t�0 feet oEsubject site (on both sides of street)
• Minimum two foot contours for slopes (ess than l5 percent and Hve foot contours for slopes
i� percent or �eater, datum sha(l be King County Aeria( Survey or NGVD-29
• Delineate slopes greater than 40 percent � on or within 2� Eeet of the site
• Delineate streacns, ponds, wetlands, natural drainaDe courses, and other surface water
features on or within 200 feet of the site per Federal Way Revised Code (F WRC) Chapter
1430, "Critical Areas"
• IdentifY trees as defined bv FWRC 19.05200
J. Site Plan
• Project name, plan date, and/or revision date(s)
• Name and phone number of owner/aaent
• Name, phone number, and License stamp of preparer
• North arrow and bar scale
• Vicinity map
• Site area
• Total parking stall count
• Total gross floor area of all proposed floors or levels
• Location and dimensions of existing/and or proposed structures, property (ines, sidewallcs,
easements, pazking tayout, street edges, mechanical equipment, trash enclosures, outdoor
uses, storage azeas, fencing, rockeries, and retaining wal(s
• Existing streams, ponds, wetiands, natival drainage courses, and other surface water
feaiures on or within 200 feet of site per FWRC Chapter 14_30, "Critical Areas"
• Location of stands of trees as defined by FWRC 19.05_200
• Existing and proposed utilities including: utitity poles and boxes, water, storm sewer,
sanitary sewer, and fire hydrants
• Sh and driveways within t�0 feet of subject site (on both sides of street)
• International Building Code (iBC) construction type and occupancy classification
• Location and square footage calcutations of any on-site pedestrian areas (i_e., p(azas,
courtyazds) or open space areas
• Indicate any proposed phasin� with proposed time[ines for full comptetion.
• Show location and calculate acreaae orecluded &om development due to the presence of
critical areas, includina: wetlands. streams, steep slopes, and other features (aton; with
buffersl. broken out by category, covered bv critical areas re�ulations.
• Show location and calcu(ate acreaee dedicated for public rights-of-way (for both newl�
created streets and expansions oEexistin� streets), as well as private tracts. allevs, and
ingess/e�ess and utilities easement broken out by categorv.
• Show location and calcu(ate acreage of tracts (or other azeas) dedicated or set aside for
retention/detention/drainaee facilities, open space, or other on-site public facilities, broken
out by cate�orv
• Provide net site area. which is gross area minus critical areas. ri�hts-oE way, private open
space. and ublic pur�se lands.
� Public purpose landr mean acreage of tracts (or othec areas) dedicated for retention/detention/drainage facilities, open space and parks, or
other on-site public facilities_
Bulletin #001— August 18, 2010 Page 2 of � k/Elandouts/Devetopment Requirements
K:�2009 Code AmendmawlSubmuW requi(emm[slStaff r�wdCurtaa staff repwt with adubi[s�Ezhibitt E. F G. fC ( aad JVExhibit H- Dwdopmeat Ra�uiremmts p(wr fonnatfiag.doc
it uired Submitted
� K. Prel'uninary Drainage, Gcadina, and Right-of-Way Plan
-� �_:_ :`., • Project name, plan date, and/or revisioa date(s)
_. • Name, phone number, and license stamp of preparer
• NoRh arrow and bar scale
r ` X >� • Preliminary storm drainage system in accordance with the 2009 King County Surface Water
�� ' ��` {'- Design �Lfanuut �iCCS�1VDNt}, as acnenderl by Federal Way
�� ���
��, ��- � � • Preliminary �-ading plan with finished contours; minimum two foot coatours for slopes (ess
'�'� `��' '� than L 5 percent and five foot contours for slopes i 5 percent or greater; datum shall be Kina
.:�.,
� � '��� �,. � .
� ��y ` =' County Aeriai Survey or NGVD-29
,,�� u y _
��� ��� �� y • Preliminary riaht-of way improvement plan, as required by the Public Works Dept
-� ��'� ��,.:;� • Approximate cut & fill quanrities of site earthwork
� K _ ,:� .-_
� ��' �- y ' • Total existing and proposed impervious surEace area
�� � � ,w �
� �� = ���: f r �_+ : • Existing and proposed utilities inciuding: utitity poles and boxes, water, storm sewer,
���� �� £ sanitary sewer, and fire hydrants
�` ��`' _ � = � L_ Preliminary Landscape Plan
�
�� � �
;��--� z; ,� a • Project name, plan date, and/or revision date(s)
'' �' Name, phone number, and license stamp of preparer
� ' �. t r � .
� � ���h �� �
r��,� � f • North arrow and bar scale
L �� ' • Specific location, type, size, and number of trees to remain and to be removed
�'�'�� : +�- ~`"�
�>�*� �x`,�A; ,�, • Plant schedule with the scientific name, common name, size, spacing, and quantity oEeach
a��� �_ "'�-=5'.'34:.
�`�=� ��' _ • Specific tocation and square footage calculations oEdrought toterant lantiscaping (document
` ey ��� `�-�� �'� �� that a minimum 25 percent is provided per FW2C t9. i25.040[6])
_ ,�� � � �ti�
�� :r � �
Y „ ��- ; • Irrigarion ptan for lawn aceas
-- �` ��"'� '`�~� ` • Specific locarion, sc�uare footage calculations, and total square footage of each parking tot
� : ;���� ��
f ��� �� a-� �� landscape island per FWItC 19.125.070(2)(a)
���'�� �� ��- � "_ • Screening of outdoor faciliries such as: trash/recycling enclosures, outdoor storage, drive
����
� ��
� �,,� �} ��-= through faci(ities, stocmwater facitities, and ground based mechanical equipment
�` ��� Building wall area landscaping per EWRC t9.125.040
: � .
3�,
�� �'r ��. �n- • Specific location of street trees in the right-of-way
�:Y • [denrify perimeter (andscape type as I, II, or III
�
�.
'' ' " � ` M. BuildinQ Elevations/Desi Intent
r� �.. s � b C'
�_ Q • Project name, plan date, and/or revision date(s)
��� �' �`- • Name, phone number, and license stamp of preparer
• Bar scale
�-: �. • Statement of architecturat desi� intent, finish materials, and colors
-- • Front, rear, and side ((abeted as north, south, east, and west) buiiding e(evations of proposed
- sh
� � ' � � - • Exterior wall openings
�� • Exterior materials and cotors board
, .,;: � • Garbage/recycling facility screen details
`� = • Roof-top and ground based mechanicat equipment screen details
� • Building height calculation
�. _; _ • Narrative suminary of how project complies with applicable desi� guidelines (FWRC
:��, �, y r - Chapter 19.1 i�, "Community Design Guidelines")
�- s -
�`'`� `` - : N. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checktist
��'��� �� �� . Eight copies of the completed, signed, and dated SEPA checklist
���"_� -
�,��, _ : � -
Buitetin #001— August l8, 2010 Page 3 of � k:/Elandouts/Development Requirements
K12009 Code AmrndmauslSubmittal teQuiranrntslStaff fepwt\Currau sta@'ceport witL uh�b'rtslExLibits � F C+. E� i azd 1�E�ibic H. Devdopmarc Requiranmts poor fomutting.dx
R uired Submitted
O. Clearing and �~adinap(an
� -�.� • Project name. plan date, and/or revision date(s).
• Name. phone number. and license stamp of preParer-
� • North arrow and bar sca(e.
:- 3 y • Identification of existin� slope depictin�areas with 0% to t�% s(ope; areas with 15% to
_ �U�/o siope: and areas o[ 40% or greater slope_
=' � -�� y� • Proposed des.
�'� "�. f' = • Locarion of al( exisring and/or proposed structures. driveways. riQht-of-wa��rovements.
�_: -'� ¢� utilities, and easemeats on the subiect propertv.
=� �'� z .
- ``-� � • Desi�nation of atl wet(ands. streams, and other criticat areas that are on or within 300 feet
of any area proposed to be disturbed by the proposed c(earin� and/or �ading action.
��,��� ��` • Areas proposed for ciearin� and the pro�osed use for such areas.
';�-'''��` - $_ • Any proposed ,zrade changes that adverselv affect or endanger trees on the property andJor
`� �' - adjacent propecties, and specifications to maintain them.
�`� �'' A minimum of two cross sections of the site, drawn to scale, depictin� the existing and
- .
_ proposed grade and an�proposed rockeries and/or retainin� walls. The director may aiso
��-_ require a three dimensional topo,� model of existino and proposed topographic
� .,�, � � �� � _ conditions.
� t �� $ • Location and descriptioa ofproposed erosion control devices and structures.
;��. .£_.,� , �: • Wfien required. a geotechnical report, preoared bYa �youtechnicat engineer, that contains
��: ��•*_� '�'�, ,;� y sufficient information to detecmine the potential impacts of the proposed clearin��and
�
�� din as well as ro osecl measures to reduce or eliminate these im cts.
� �a n, ��
�� f � �` � P. Tree/Vegetation Retention Plan
� ��r �
z�,, ' �. • Project name. p1an date. and/or revision date(s).
y� _�'�� ���� . • Name. phone number_ and license stamp of preparer, who sha(t be a certified arborist or a
�.� �
� ��f ,� �� � � certified landscape arcEutect.
`" �"` � North acrow and bar scate.
�� t�•-� ? �x�:� •
���� • Statement o�tlinine the pur�oses of anyproposed tree removai (e Q buildin�,coastrucrion.
,,- �,, :� �; y ';�� �°� street or roadwav. drivewav, recreation area, patio. or parking totl. together with a proposed
�� -(�-- ss ;X.
< Y : S`' timetable for when this work will occur.
�� � • A tree survey that identifies the location. a�proximate size, species, and number of trees on
�
- this site and also identifies the Qenerai (ocation of trees within �0 feet of the site. Tree
- surve� les mav oniv be used at the discretion of the director.
- • A depiction of the spatia( (imits for tree/ve�etation retenrion areas and detai(s of
tree/ve etation protection measures.
- `? • A depiction of anv new ve�etated areas to be estabiished.
, ;.
- "-
-�� {- >. ,,;, ; • The manner in which the c(eared areas on the property wili be reclaimed with vezetation
��� � y s�ecification or anv recauired mitigation piantings and a timetable for replantins
• A�proved tree/ve�etation retention �lan shatl be incorpo�ated into the c(earing and �rading.
- � drawinas for final construction documentation.
Bulletin #001— August t 8, 20 t 0 Page 4 of � k:/E[andoutslDevelopment Requirements
K12009 Cade AmendmauslSubmittal requirommtslStaff tepaRlCutrrnt uaff reQat with achbiWErhbics E. F G. FC f and J1Ex(tibit H- Dwdopm«tt Requ"vanans poor formatdng.doc
Special Studies and Additional Information
R uirei# Submittecl Please rovide FOUR co ies of the followin :
� Q Level One Downstream storm drainage analysis as described in the KCSWDM, as
amended b Federal Wa
` � � Preliminary technical information report addressing relevance of the 8 Core and 5 Special
Re uirements of the KCSWDM
❑ � Trip generation analysis prepared by an engineer licensed in State of Washington
.❑ � Traffic impact analysis an engineer licensed in State of Washington
� B Parking study as required by the Traffic Division.
�'II � Noise study
� , ❑ Lighting plan
C� � Geotechnical study
� � = �� �� Wetland delineation report
❑ � Wetland mitigation plan
O. ' � Stream delineation and classification report
' Q��,., Q Critical aquifer recharge & wellhead protection areas information/inventory
f Q � Other information relating to design and siting of proposed development (including site
cross sections)
C7 �. Specific information to determine compliance with city goals, policies, and regulations
Notice Requirements
Process III — For applications that are located within, or are, 300 feet from properties
❑ � zoned SE, RS, or RM, provide one set of self-addressed, stamped business sized envelopes
(with City of Federal Way return address) of persons receiving property ta�c statements for
all properties within 300 feet of the boundary of the subject property. Include a separate list
of the addresses with their parcel numbers and an assessor's map showing the 300-foot
- boundary.
Process IV— Provide two sets of self-addressed, stamped business sized envelopes (with
Q ❑ ` City of Federal Way return address) of persons receiving property tax statements for all
properties within 300 feet of the boundary of the subject property. Include a separate tist of
the addresses with their parcel numbers and an assessor's map showing the 300-foot
boundary.
SEPA — Provide one set of self-addressed, stamped business sized envelopes (with City of
D: ❑ Federal Way return address) of persons receiving property tax statements for all properties
' within 300 feet of the boundary of the subject property. Include a separate list of the
addresses with their parcel numbers and an assessor's map showing the 300-foot boundary.
IMPORTANT — Please do not subtnit metered envelopes. The Federal Way Post Office
may refuse such envelopes. In addition, you are highly encouraged to use the Forever
stamps.
Bulietin #001 — August 18, 2010 Page 5 of � k:/Handouts/Development Requirements
K�.�2009 Code Ammdments\Submittal requirements\$taff reportlCurrent staff report with exhibits�Exhibits E, F G, H, ( and J�Ezttibit H- Dwelopment Requiremmts poor fo[matting.doc
EXHIBIT I
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19.15, "Permits and Review
Processes"
19.15.045 "Completeness of applications"
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
Exhibit i
19.15.045 Completeness of applications.
(1) Use Process 1 and Use Process 11. At the time of intake of a complete use
process I or use process II application a notice of completeness as referenced in
FWRC 19 15 040 shall be provided to the applicant This notice shall indicate the
date the application is deemed complete If the citv determines that the use process I
or use process I I application is incomplete the Citv shall notifv the applicant of what
needs to be submitted for a complete use process I or use process II application.
,
, . . .
,
, ,
,
a� In the notice of application, if reauired, +"�� ;•:r°±±°^ ,�°`.°"'''`-""+`^", the city
shall also identify, to the extent known to the city, the other agencies of local, state,
or federal government that may have jurisdiction over some aspect of the proposed
development activity.
(2) Use Process 111 or Use Process IV. Within 28 calendar days of receivinq an
a pplication for use process III or use process IV the cit shall determine whether fhe
a��lication is complete as referenced in FWRC 19 15 040 If found to be complete,
prior to the 28-day deadline a letter of completeness shall be issued indicatina the
date the use process III or use process IV application is deemed complete. If the citv
determines the application to be incomplete prior to the 28-dav deadline, the citv
shall notify the applicant of what needs to be submitted for a complete use process
III or use process IV application In this written determination the citv shall also
identifv to the extent known to the cit the other agencies of local state, or federal
government that mav have L risdiction over some aspect of the proposed
development activitv. If the use process III or use process IV a� application was
found incomplete and an applicant submits additional information, the city shall notify
the applicant in writing within 14 days, the date the application is deemed complete
or whether further additional information is necessary.
(3) Additional information. A determination of completeness shall not preclude the
city from requesting additional information or studies, either at the time of the letter of
completeness or subsequently, if new information is required or if there are
substantial changes in the proposed action.
(4) Vesting. A proposed use process I, II, III, or IV application shall vest to and be
considered under the zoning code and other land use control ordinances in effect on
the land at the time a fully completed application for use process I, II, III, or IV has
been submitted to the city. In the event that the application is deemed incomplete,
the use process I, II, III, or IV application shall vest to those codes in effect on the
date that all requested supplemental or specific information is submitted. A complete
application shall be defined as set forth in FWRC 19.15.040 and based on
requirements in related handouts. Vested rights shall not be waivable pursuant to the
vested rights doctrine.
(Ord. No. 09-625, § 3, 9-15-09; Ord. No. 09-594, § 19, 1-6-09. Code 2001 § 22-
33.5.)
K:�2009 Code AmendmeMS\Submittal requirements\Staff report\Curtent staff report with exhibits�Exhibits E, F G, H, I and 7�Exhibit I version 2 revised 19.15.045.doc
EXHIBIT J
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19.15, "Permits and Review
Processes"
19.15.030 "Review processes for improvements and additions to
developed sites"
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
Exhibit J
19.15.030 Review processes for improvements and additions to developed
sites.
Improvements and/or additions to existing developed sites shall be subject to
land use review processes as follows:
{1) Process I_ Improvements and/or additions to an existing developed site that
are exempt from SEPA shall be processed using process I, provided the
improvements and/or additions do not exceed any of the fotlowing thresholds:
(a) There is no change of use.
(b) There is no reduction in the amount of required landscaping, buffering,
open space, or public areas.
(c) There is no material change or reduction in the amount of required
parfcing.
(d) There is no material change in #he location of utilities, easemen#s, or
pedestrian connections.
(e) There is no material change to the approved architectural design.
(fl There are no additional adverse impacts to �°^� °��:� critical areas. ef
cinnif��n� 4roec�
(2) Process ll. Improvements and/or additions to an existing developed site
that are exempt from SEPA and exceed the thresholds in subsection (1) of this
section shall be processed using process II.
(3) lmprovements not exempt f�om SEPA. Improvements and/or additions to
an existing developed site that are not exempt from SEPA shall be processed
under process III, unless process IV is indicated by the applicable use zone chart
in which case process (V shall be used_
(Ord. No. 07-573, § 10, 12-4-07; Ord. No. 00-375, § 9, 10-3-00. Code 2001 § 22-
32-2-)
K:L'�W9 Code Amendments�Submittal requiremenu�Staffreport\Curtert staffreport with ochibits�Ezhibits E, F G, H, [ and 11Erhibit 1- revised 19.1 i 030.doc
City Council Agenda Bill
Attachment #3: Draft Minutes of
the August 25, 2010
Planning Commission Public Hearing
Amendments to FWRC Chapter 18 Subdivisions, and Chapter 19
regarding submittal requirements for plats and commercial projects.
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 25, 2010 City Hall
7•00 p m Council Chambers
MEETING MINUTES
Commissioners present: Merle Pfeifer, Hope Elder, Lawson Bronson, Wayne Carlson, Sarady Long, Tim O'Neil
and Tom Medhurst. Staff present: Director of Community Development Services Greg Fewins, Planning
Manager Isaac Conlen, Principal Planner Margaret Clark, Senior Planner Deb Barker, Senior Planner Janet Shull,
Assistant City Attorney Peter Beckwith, and Administrative Assistant Darlene LeMaster. Council Member Jeanne
Burbidge was also present.
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Pfeifer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
All commissioners present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of July 21, 2010, were approved as written.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
None
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Director of Community I3eve�opment Services will address the commission during the `Additional Business'
section of the agenda.
COMMISSION BITSINESS
PuBLiC H�AxuvG — Shoreline �Iaster Program Update
Chair Pfeifer expla�ed the guidelines for the Public Hearing.
Senior Planner Janet Shull stated that the intent of tonight's meeting was to consider revisions to the draft
Shareline Master Plan (SMP).She introduced the City's consultant, Teresa Vanderburg with ESA Adolfson and
David Pader with the Depart�ent of Ecology. She also stated that there was a sign up sheet at the back that
serves two purposes. The ftrst was to sign in if you would like to testify and secondly, to sign up if you would
like to be on an e-mail notification list.
Ms. Shull gave a brief overview of the SMP, which serves to regulate development along shorelines of the state
and establishes a comprehensive vision of how the shoreline area will be used and developed over time. She also
stated that local jurisdictions are required to prepare a local SMP to carry out the requirements of the Shoreline
Master Act (SMA). The SMP also includes goals and policies that are part of the City's comprehensive plan and
regulations that are part of the city code. The SMP includes information about existing conditions and analysis
about the potential cumulative impacts of future development and opportunities for restoration.
Ms. Shull then showed a map of the City's shorelines explaining that there were two categories — marine
shorelines and shorelines associated with lakes. There are two lakes, Steel Lake and North Lake within the City
G:\Planning Commission�2010�Meeting Summary OS-25-10.doc
Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 July 25, 2010
and a number of additional lakes within the Potential Annexation Area (PAA). The City is required to plan for
the lakes within the PAA, however, the regulations will only apply when the area is annexed into the City.
Ms Shull then summarized the SMP process to date. She explained that work on the SMP began in early 2006.
At that time a Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) and a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) were formed to
provide input on the update. The City held a public open house in June 2006 and set up a website with
information on the SMP update. In 2007, the Planning Commission held three public meetings after which they
forwarded their recommendation to the City Council, who approved the draft SMP update in June 2007. In July
2007, the draft SMP update was submitted to the DOE for review and comments were received from DOE in
January 2009.
City staff and their consultant ESA Adolfson have been working with DO� on revisions based on DOE's
comments for the past year. Because the draft SMP update has been changed since the Planning Commission
and Council last saw it, staff decided to bring it back to both Planning Camrnission and City Council.
The City mailed notice to all shoreline property owners within the Cfty and p�A about the public comment
process and the availability of draft documents. The City also marled notice to forrner �AC and TAC members.
This City's website was also updated and links to the revised draft SMP were provided. Hard copies of the
revised documents were placed in libraries and were made available at City Hall. A�agy �uas also made
available in the City Council Conference Room and council tnee�nbers we�e made aware of its availability.
Ms Shull then went over highlights to the revisions. She �r;plained that Section 2— Inventory and
Characterization and Section 4— Shoreline Environment had not bee� updated as DOE had no comments on
these sections. Section 2 is very bulky so it was �tot included in the Pla�r�ng Commission's blue binder, but is
on the website, however the Shoreline Environment Besignations, which is a si�tgle page map, was included.
Ms Shull explained that Section One - Introduction was revis�d �a prese�t a better linkage between our local
SMP and the Statewide SMA. Four new policies were added to Sectto�t fihree -- Goals and Policies. Ms Shull
stated that we modified existi�g �o��cies to add emphasis on the SMA goal of "no net loss" of ecological
function of the city's shorelines, the Purpose and Responsibility section was expanded and a section
summarizing Public Partieipatian was added.
Ms Shull stated that in Section �ive -- ShoreTine' Regulations, numerous revisions were made for clarity. Far
example, city sta�f �ddec€ a Developtnent Standa.rds 'I'able; integrated critical areas regulations instead of having
them be app�tdices; added rec�uiremerft for a 50-foot setback from top of marine bluffs; and added a staff
proposed c�ange to allow piers a�d docks an �he Marine Shoreline.
In Section Six -- Restoration Plan, �ity staff added and updated information on regional programs that help with
shoreline restaratia�t; added inforn�ation on restoration opportunities for freshwater lakes; and added two tables
that summarize and prioritize restoration opportunities.
In Section 7, staff added de��i�ions that are required to make the City's SMP consistent with the SMA. Ms
Shull also stated that in Appendix A-- Cumulative Impacts Analysis, staff added a table that summarizes land
development activity in the past five years within the shareline area and added a section that analyzes the
potential cumulative impact of allowing docks and piers on the marine shoreline.
Ms Shull mentioned that staff had scheduled a study session with the planning commission and interested
citizens for August 4, 2010, however it was changed to an informational meeting when only one Planning
Commissioner, Commissioner Carlson, attended. There were eleven citizens, the City`s Consultant and the DOE
staff in addition to staff in attendance. During the meeting, there was discussion on proposed setbacks from
marine bluff and proposed standards for bulkheads. There was also one written comment, Exhibit 2, a request
from the Kutschas to modify the stringline provisions for lakes only. Ms Shull stated that since the stringline
setback provisions had already been approved by Council, staff is not recommending any changes.
Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 July 25, 2010
Ms Shull then went over some modifications proposed by staff. These included clarifying that the 50-foot
minimum marine bluff setback is from the "top" of the marine bluff. It also included modifying Section
15.05.050(1)(a)(i-iii) to make it clear that hard shore armoring (bulkheads/riprap) is subject to proof of
imminent damage and a shoreline conditional use permit in the Urban Conservancy Environment and that no
conditional use permit is required for soft shore armoring regardless of zone.
Ms Shull ended her presentation by stating that staff recommends approval of the proposed revisions to the draft
SMP Update with staff modifications as depicted in Exhibit 1 to the August 25, 2010 staff report.
The public hearing was opened for public testimony.
Norm Kutscha, 33021 38`" Ave S, Federal Way — Submitted a document dated �ugust 25, 2010 and also
read from the document requesting that the Planning Commission take another look at the shoreline
setback regulations for lakes in order to make them more equitable for existing homes in relationship to
new homes.
Peter Townsend,• 29508 12` Ave SW, Federal Way — He felt �ttat it is imporEant ; to know what staff
considers the problem areas under the SMA for the past five years and what shoulc� b� done to solve the
problems.
The public hearing was opened to questions from the commissioners:
Commissioner Bronson asked what changes are being made because a�'UOE requirements and what changes are
being made by the City, such as setbacks, that we coul,d change later. Ms. �hull replied that most of the changes
in the binder are required changes, except for piers�dvc�CS and setbacks. She ttoted that the Kutscha's request
would not be opposed by DOE. However, staff didn't feel it was their place to make changes to what the City
had already approved.
David Pater with Department of Ecotogy from the Be�Tevue office introduced himself and noted that he has
worked with the city to resoIve issues a:nd believed that they have resolved them. The state recognizes the
unique distinction of eaeh j�risdiction, and there is some flexibility. The shoreline stabilization section is the
most rigid. The state uses a che�I�ist to malce sure each jurisdiction has met requirements, and that there is room
for modifications to setbacks, pie�s �nd decks. He further added that there was a lot of back and forth
negotiations betwcen t�e �ity and D()E.
Commissio��r O'Neil wonderec� �hat the ehanges meant for the taxpayer and how might the use of waterfront
property be Ghanged. Ms. Shull not�d that the goal was to make as few changes as possible, and that the changes
appear reasona��ile, �
Teresa Vanderburg v�t;� ESA/AdoT€'son noted that there is a new focus on conserving and preserving vegetation
within the setback zone and also to avoid impacts to resources in the water. There are also provisions for
dimensions of docks and piers. She clarified that the changes are only for new development and not existing
development. There is a provision for tear-down houses or expanding existing uses.
Commissioner Medhurst asked if variances were available. Ms. Shull replied that yes, shoreline variances are
subject to hearing examiners recommendation that is forwarded to the State, which has the ultimate approval.
Commissioner O'Neil asked whether the DOE had the final say just for variances. Ms. Shull answered that DOE
would have the final say only for variances and conditional use permits. However, these decisions are
appealable to the Shoreline Hearings Board.
Commissioner Carlson was concerned about the length of time it took for the DOE's response to proposed
changes to the City's shoreline code. Ms. Shull noted that the state experienced staff shortages, and that once
their comments were available, the amendment was prioritized and brought to commissioners as complete as
Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 July 25, 2010
possible. Commissioner Carlson also had questions about the value of the cumulative impacts analysis as the
analysis is quantitative but the conclusions are qualitative. David Pader, with DOE responded, that the
cumulative impacts analysis is adequate
Chair Pfeifer asked if there were any more questions from the commissioners, and seeing none called for the
motion.
Commissioner Bronson moved to recommend adoption of the code amendment as prepared by staff.
Commissioner Medhurst seconded the motion.
Discussion — Commissioner Elder urged Commissioners to consider item #4 of the Kutscha's request regarding
setbacks. Commissioner Carlson disagreed with Commissioner Elder noting that the Kutscha's request, if
approved, might penalize property owners who have not yet exercised theis de�elopment rights. Commissioner
Carlson also acknowledged that critical areas need greater setbacks.
The motion carried, 6-1 (Elder dissenting).
The public hearing was closed.
PUBL�C HEAR�NG — Amendments Related to Submittal Requirements for Plats and Commercial Projects
Chair Pfeifer explained the guidelines for the Publi� �Iearing.
Senior Planner Deb Barker delivered the staff repart.
(FWRC) include:
Praposec� amendments to the Federal Way Revised Code
• Short Subdivisions — Chapter I8.34 d30 Content and form of appfication;
• Preliminary Plat — ChapCer 18.35.0�`a' Content and form of application;
• Permits and Revie�w Pracess —�hapter 19.15.1740 Development Application Submittal
Requirements;
• Permits and Review Processes -� �tapler I9_1�. a45 Completeness of Applications; and
• Permits ancl Review Proeesses - Chapter 19.1 S. 030(1) (� Review Processes for improvements and
additiores Yo developed sates�� �� � � �
The public hearing was opened far gublic testimony.
There was no public e¢mment.
The public testimony was elosed,
The public hearing was opened to questions from the commissioners:
Commissioner O'Neil said he agreed with the checklist concept and feels that it is much easier for the public to
use. He inquired whether this information was available on-line. Ms. Barker replied that submittal requirements
checklists are available on the City's website and staff can assist the applicant to locate the requirements and the
checklists. Commissioner O'Neil asked if the applications are tracked on-line. Ms. Barker noted that the current
permit tracking system is not set up to track these applications on-line.
Commissioner Medhurst wanted to understand if the requirements have changed, or if some have been
eliminated. He feels that the checklist is more confusing and could be arbitrarily applied. He prefers code as
written. Ms. Barker said that the code does not give any discretion to waive submittal items that may not be
Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 July 25, 2010
necessary, while the checklist provides flexibility. Chairman Pfeifer noted that there is lots of support from
Master Builders for the checklist and bulletin concept. Commissioner Medhurst asked for clarification as to
which codes were eliminated. Chairman Pfeiffer stated that none of the codes were eliminated and the code is
still there. The checklists provide a place to go to find out what their specific application requires. Ms Barker
pointed out that the code states that the director may waive any requirements that are determined to not be
reasonably necessary. Commissioner Medhurst replied that language addressed his concerns and he is satisfied.
Commissioner Carlson is also in support of the checklist format. However, he is still concerned that submittal
requirements can be modified at the stroke of a pen. He believes that any types of changes to the submittal
process should go through the public process, especially the planning commission. He supports the amendments
only if substantive changes to application submittal requirements go through public process. Ms. Barker stated
that substantive changes to the code do come from code amendments that ha�� a�ready gone through a public
process. She noted that recent changes to the clearing and grading codes cp�tained very substantive changes to
performance standards, and those changes to code went through a very publi� process. Substantive code changes
are not administratively made, but are approved through the code amendmen� �irocess. Commissioner Carlson
stated that allayed some but not all of his concerns.
Commissioner Bronson agreed that the checklist is a wonder€ar2 idea. He asked why pra,�e�ts can't be submitted
electronically. Ms. Barker replied the City's permitting system is only equipped to rece�e eleetrical permits
electronically. Commissioner Bronson asked why appticatio�s could not be submitted o� a thumb drive.
Planning Manager Conlen agreed that these types of projects c�o take a�ot af paper and the City would love to
reduce paper. However, the City does not have the technology to F��iew applications on a computer screen, to
mark it up or make comments. If applications are submitted electronica�Zy, the City has added copying costs that
should be borne by the applicant. Commissioner Sronson is amazed that City does not have enough equipment
to review the plans electronically. Planning Manager �o�len said that it w�x�d be great if we did but currently
we do not have that technology.
Commissioner Long thanked staf� for bringing this tapic to the Corn�issioners. He feels that this concept will
be a big benefit to develope�s. �e inquired if plans were required for Process I and II before they were
determined to be complete. lt�s. Barker ecanfirmed that pIans were required and gave examples of typical process
I and II applications. Commissioner Lo�tg inquired abou� the differences between existing code and proposed
changes to the completeness section of the code. Planning Manager Conlen stated that there is no change to
current practices. The intent is ta elari�y the eade so it is clear what the practice is. There is no change from
current practice �or prvicess I and II ea�mpleteness review, which is done at counter; and there is no change for
process III anc� IV compT�teness review, v�hich take a more lengthy review process and includes a follow-up
letter.
Commissioner E7yNei11 said that I�e understands that the proposed amendment clarifies when an applicant
becomes vested. ll�s; Barker confirmed that as the current code is vague, it is important to clarify that a complete
application is a vested �plication. ,
Commissioner Long observ�d that currently the City's Traffic Division determines if a submitted traffic study is
acceptable, and therefore if an application is complete. With the proposed language, an application would be
considered complete even if the submitted traffic study was later found to be unacceptable. Ms. Barker noted
that was an on-going topic of concern by staff since reports are not always professionally prepared.
Commissioner Long recommends that the checklists be changed to add that traffic impact analysis shall be
stamped by a professional engineer. This was clarified so that the report shall be prepared by a licensed engineer
in State of Washington.
Chairman Pfeifer thanked staff for putting the amendment together. He believes that the code amendment makes
sense and will save developers time in the long run.
Commissioner Long moved to recommend adoption of the code amendment as prepared by staff.
Planning Commission Minutes Page 6
Commissioner Carlson seconded the motion.
July 25, 2010
There was general discussion and agreement that Commissioner Long's recommended changes to the checklist
do not need to be reflected in the motion.
The motion carried, 7-0.
The public hearing was closed.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
Director of Community Development Services Greg Fewins addressed the C.ommission with the following
items:
Administrative Assistant Piety will be on medical leave for an undete�Fmined period of time. During her
absence, Tamara Fix will be the person to communicate with regarding Planni�g �ommission. Ms. Fix will be
assembling the Planning Commission agenda packet and corresponding with atI Planning Commissioners and
Stakeholders. Darlene LeMaster will be staffing all Planning Eommission meetii�gs and drafting meeting
minutes
October 20, 2010 Planning Commission Public Hearing will be on Urban Chickens. T�ere are no topics for
either the Sept. 1 or the Sept. 15, 2010 Planning Commission meetings, therefore, those tneetings will be
cancelled. Staff would like to propose a study session for t}�e ful� Planning Commission on Wednesday,
September 29, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. to talk about the urban chicken tdpic. All Commissioners said they would be
able to attend the special study session.
2011-2012 Budget — Director Fewins explained ta t�ie �vmmissioners hovu� 4o access all of the 2011-2012 City
Budget documents from the City's website. Director Fewins also highlighted the proposed budget cuts to
impact the Department of Community Development Services shou�d Councit approved the proposed budget.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
None
ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p;m. "
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 10/OS/2010
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
ITEM #: � �-
SUBJECT: Amendments to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19 relating to clarifying the complete
application and review standards of the zoning and development code, and a housekeeping amendment that
maintains consistent critical areas language.
POLICY QUESTION: Should the City of Federal Way approve an amendment to Federal Way Revised Code
(FWRC), Chapter 19, that clarifies which land use applications are subject to completeness standards as well as a
housekeeping amendment to maintain consistent use of critical areas language?
COMMITTEE: Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) MEETING DATE: 09/20/2010
CATEGORY:
❑ Consent
❑ City Council Business
� Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing
❑ Resolution ❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY: Deb Barker, Senior Planner
DEPT Community Development Services
Attachments: (1) Draft Adoption Ordinance; (2) Staff Report to the Planning Commission for the August 25,
201 D,Pubdic Hearing; and (3) Draft Minutes of the August 25, 2010, Planning Commission Public Hearing.
Options Considered: (1) Adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation as shown in the Draft Adoption
ordinance; (2) Adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation as modified by the LUTC; (3) Do not adopt
the amendments; or (4) R�er the amendments back to the Planni�Commission, f'or furthe�roceedin�s.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommends that the Councii approve Option #1; adopt the Planning Commission's
recommendation reflected in the Draft Adoption Ordinance.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: •W'I �) F'�' }��a DIRECTOR APPROVAL: � __���
Committee Council Committee Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION I move to forward the proposed ordinance to First Reading on October S
2010. �
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION(S):
2 READING OF ORDINANCE (10/19/2010) I move approval of the L UTC recommendation to approve the
code amendments, which are reflected in the Adoption Ordinance. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL AC I'ION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1sT reading � •
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactmeot reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances onlyJ ORDINANCE #
REVISED - 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION #
l READING OF ORDINANCE (10/OS/2010) I move to forrvard the ordinance to a second reading for
enactment on the October 19, 2010 consent agenda.
City Council Meeting Date: October 5, 2010
City Council Agenda Bill
Attachment #1:
Draft Adoption Ordinance
Amendments to FWRC Chapter 19 relating to clarifying the complete
application and review standards of the zoning and development codes,
and a housekeeping amendment that maintains consistent critical areas
language.
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating
to clarifying the complete application and review standards of the
zoning and development code; amending FWRC 19.15.045 and
FWRC 19.15.030. (Amending Ordinance Nos. 09-625, 09-594, 07-573
and 00-375)
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the need to periodically modify Title 19 of the Fecleral Way
Revised Code (FWRC), "Zoning and Development Code," in order to conform to state and federal law,
codify administrative practices, clarify and update zoning regulations as deemed necessary, and improve
the efficiency of the regulations and the development review process; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance, containing amendments to development regulations, and the text of
Title 19 FWRC, has complied with Process VI review, chapter 19.80 FWRC, pursuant to chapter 19.35
FWRC; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the City Council to adopt language that clarifies which
applications are subject to completeness review standards within the City of Federal Way; and
WHEREAS, the amendment reflects that Process I, II, III, and IV land use processes are subject
to completeness standards; and
WHEREAS, the amendment documents that completeness review far Process I and Process II
applications is conducted `over the counter' and is expedited so that an applicant can receive a"notice of
completeness" at intake; and
WHEREAS, completeness review for Process III and IV applications occurs during Development
Review Committee (DRC) deliberations which are scheduled within 28 days of application submittal; and
WHEREAS, in order to maintain consistent definitions and terms throughout the FWRC, a
"housekeeping" amendment to replace the term "sensitive" areas with the term "critical" areas and
eliminate reference to the term "significant trees" in FWRC 19.15.030(1)(fl is proposed; and
Ordinance No. 10- Page 1 of 5
WHEREAS, the Proposal is categarically exempt from environmental review under the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(20}; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission properly conducted a duly noticed public hearing on these
code amendments on August 25, 2010, and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council;
and
WHEREAS, the Land Use/Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council
considered these code amendments on September 20, 2010, and recommended adoption of the text
amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findin�s. The City Council of the City of Federal Way makes the following findings
with respect to the proposed amendments.
(a) These code amendments are in the best interest of the residents of the City and will
benefit the City as a whole by clarifying what projects are subject to completeness review and removing
inconsistent language.
(b) These code amendments comply with Chapter 36.70A RCW, Growth Management.
(c) These code amendments are consistent with the intent and purpose of Title 19 FWRC and
will implement and are consistent with the applicable provisions of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan.
(d) These code amendments bear a substantial relationship to, and will protect and not
adversely affect, the public health, safety, and welfare.
(e) These code amendments have followed the proper procedure required under the FWRC.
Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to chapter 19.80 FWRC and chapter 19.35 FWRC, and based
upon the recitals and the findings set forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council makes the
following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the adoption of the
proposed amendments:
Ordinance No. 10- Page 2 of 5
(a) The proposed FWRC amendments are consistent with, and substantially implement, the
following Federal Way Comprehensive Plan goals and policies:
L UP4 Maximize efficiency of the development review process.
EDPI S The City will continue to implement a streamlined permitting process consistent with
state and federal regulations to reduce the upfront costs of locating businesses in the
City.
HP9 Maximize efficiency in the City's development review process and ensure that
unnecessary time delays and expenses are eliminated. Continue to provide streamlined
permitting processes for development that is consistent with the FWCP and FWCC,
and that has no adverse impacts.
(b) The proposed FWRC amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health,
safety, and welfare because it clarifies that projects are subject to complete application standards,
provides certainty to an applicant, and increases the efficiency of the development review processes.
(c) The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the public and the residents of the City
of Federal Way because clarity in the application process results in continued development within the
City thus aiding the local economy.
Section 3. FWRC 19.15.045 is hereby amended to read as follows:
19.15.045 Completeness of applications.
(1) Use Process I and Use Process II. At the time of intake of a complete use process I or
use process II a�plication a notice of completeness as referenced in FWRC 19.15.040 shall be
provided to the a�plicant This notice shall indicate the date the application is deemed complete.
If the city determines that the use process I or use process II a�plication is incomplete the Citv
shall notifYthe ap�licant of what needs to be submitted for a complete use process I or use
process II application. ""�+'^� ' � a � .rvrrcc ^��^^+�^^, *�° �: ;' ��'^��
, . . .
�
> > >
+,.o „ r�;,..,.,+ „�...,�.,� rooa� �„ ,.e �,,,�,r;.�oa � ,. ., �o�o ., �;,.,,+;,,r In the notice of
.,..;p,....... ..t. t.....»,.......
�plication, if required, *'��� �•W�**°� a°*°����+�^r, the city shall also identify, to the extent known
to the city, the other agencies of local, state, or federal government that may have jurisdiction
over some aspect of the proposed development activity.
(2) Use Process III or Use Process IV. Within 28 calendar davs of receivin�an
��lication far use process III or use process N the city shall determine whether the application
Ordinance No. 10- Page 3 of 5
is complete as referenced in FWRC 19.15.040. If found to be complete, prior to the 28-day
deadline a letter of completeness shall be issued indicatin�the date the use process III or use
process IV application is deemed complete If the city determines the application to be
incomplete prior to the 28-daydeadline the city shall notify the applicant of what needs to be
submitted for a complete use process III or use process N a�plication In this written
determination the city shall also identif to the extent known to the citv, the other agencies of
local state or federal �overnment that ma�ave jurisdiction over some aspect of the proposed
development activity. If the use process III or use process N� application was found
incomplete and an applicant submits additional information, the city shall notify the applicant in
writing within 14 days, the date the application is deemed complete or whether further additional
information is necessary.
(3) Additional information. A determination of completeness shall not preclude the city
from requesting additional information or studies, either at the time of the letter of completeness
or subsequently, if new information is required ar if there are substantial changes in the proposed
action.
(4) I�esting. A proposed use process I, II, III, ar N application shall vest to and be
considered under the zoning code and other land use control ordinances in effect on the land at
the time a fully completed application for use process I, II, III, or IV has been submitted to the
city. In the event that the application is deemed incomplete, the use process I, II, III, or N
application shall vest to those codes in effect on the date that all requested supplemental or
specific information is submitted. A complete application shall be defined as set forth in FWRC
19.15.040 and based on requirements in related handouts. Vested rights shall not be waivable
pursuant to the vested rights doctrine.
Section 4. FWRC 19.15.030 is hereby amended to read as follows:
19.15.030 Review processes for improvements and additions to developed sites.
Improvements and/or additions to existing developed sites shall be subject to land use review
processes as follows:
(1) Process I. Improvements and/or additions to an existing developed site that are exempt
from SEPA shall be processed using process I, provided the improvements and/or additions do
not exceed any of the following thresholds:
(a) There is no change of use.
(b) There is no reduction in the amount of required landscaping, buffering, open space,
or public areas.
(c) There is no material change or reduction in the amount of required parking.
(d) There is no material change in the location of utilities, easements, ar pedestrian
connections.
(e) There is no material change to the approved architectural design.
(f) There are no additional adverse impacts to �� critical areas_ e� .
(2) Process IL Improvements and/or additions to an existing developed site that are exempt
from SEPA and exceed the thresholds in subsection (1) of this section shall be processed using
process II.
(3) Improvements not exempt from SEPA. Improvements and/or additions to an existing
developed site that are not exempt from SEPA shall be processed under process III, unless
process IV is indicated by the applicable use zone chart in which case process IV shall be used.
Orclinance No. 10- Page 4 of 5
Section 5. Severabilitv. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The
invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the
invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the
remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to any other persons or circumstances.
Section 6. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to make
necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener/clerical
errars, references, ardinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto.
Section 7. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this
ordinance is hereby rati�ed and affirmed.
Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five (5) days after passage and
publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of
20
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, L1NDA KOCHMAR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, CAROL MCNEILLY, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.:
Ordinance No. 10- Page 5 of 5
City Council Agenda Bill
Attachment #2:
Staff Report to the Planning Commission
Amendments to FWRC Chapter 19 relating to clarifying the complete
application and review standards of the zoning and development codes,
and a housekeeping amendment that maintains consistent critical areas
language.
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
CITY OF �
��deral l�ay
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Planning Commission Meeting of Angust 25, 2010
Amendments to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 18 — Subdivisions,
Chapter 19.15.040 — Development Application Sub»uttal Requirements,
Chapter 19.15.045 — Completeness ofApplications, and
Chapter 19.15.030 — Review Processes for improvements and additions to developed sites.
SUBMITTAL REQUIItEMENTS FOR PLATS AND COMMERCIAL PROJECTS
Federal Way File No.10-102132-00-UP
Report prepared by Senior Planner Deb Barker
L PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT
As pact of the 2010 Planning Commission Work Program, City staff proposes amendments to the
Federal Way I�evised Code (FWRC) to address issues identified by the City Council and the City's
Stakeholder Group. At this time, staff is proposing to clarify which projects are subject to
completeness standards, and is further proposing that the submitta.l requirements for plats and
commercial projects be standardized, to the extent possible, in order to assist developers in the
application process, to ensure consistency in project completeness, and to provide data. necessary for
the annuat Buildable Lands Reports required by King County. One housekeeping amendment is also
proposed.
II. BACKGROUND
The City of Federal Way Stakeholder Group has conducted annua.l meetings to review City codes
and procedures since 2006. One concern was tha.t plat applications are too deta.iled and require too
much information too early in the process. Staff has reviewed the requirements for various projects
and found that for the most part, submittal items currently requested are needed in order to review
plat applications, but some discretion can be applied to initia( submittal requirements that are
currently listed in the FWRC. Staff also identified the need to clarify language regarding
completeness standards for Process I, II, III, and N land use review processes. A housekeeping
amendment is also proposed.
III. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CODE AMEPiDMENTS
To effectively communicate the submittal requirements and ciarify the objectives for review, staff
proposes to relocate submittal requirements from the FWRC into standardized submittal requirement
checklists and/or technical handouts (see attached exhibits). Standardizing submitta( requirements
checklists and technical handouts will make the submittal process more straight forward for the
applicant when preparing an application, and will support their ability to submit a complete
application. In this time of changing technology, some typical requirements become outdated. A
checklist allows customization and provides flexibility as technology evolves. In addition to the
standardized submittal requirements, this code amendment c(arifies that Use Process t, II, III, and N
are subject to completeness review. The following is a summary of the proposed amendments:
(a) Short Subdivisions — Chapter 18.30.03Q Content and form of application
FWRC 1830.030 lists the standards for the application for a short plat This language is also
used for applications for binding site plans. FWRC 1830.030(2) lists thirty separa.te items that
must be depicted on a submitted short plat drawing or submitted with the focmal application.
The purpose of this amendment is to eliminate this section and replace it with language that
refers to the ehecklist that is cnaintained 6y City staff. See F�hibitA — FWRC 18.30:030
Content and form of application and Exhibit B— Bufletin #101, Short Subdivision.
(b) Preliminary Plat — Chapter 18.35. 020 Content and form of application
FWRC 18.35.020 lists the standards for a preliminary plat application. FWRC 1835.020(2)
lists over thirty separate items that must be depicted on submitted drawings or included with the
formal appiication. The purpose of this amendment is to eliminate this section and replace it
with language that refers to the checklist that is maintained by staff. See Exhibit C— FWRC
18.35.020 Content avrd form of aFplication and Exhibit D- Bulletin #�137, Preliminary Plat
Submittal Requirements.
(c) Permits and Review Processes — Chapter 19.1 S. 040 Development Application Submittal
Requuements
FWRC 19.15.040 (ists. the standazds for a commercial project applicatian which require a
detecmination of completeness. FWRC 19_ 15.040 lists over thirty separate items that must be
depicted on submitted drawings or provided with the application, but does not clarify which
applications are subject to completeness review. The purpose of this ameadment is to clarify
that Process I, II, III and N projects are subject to completeness review. The amendment also
eliminates the list of submittal requirements and replaces it with language that refers to
checklists that are maintained by City staff. See Exhibit E— FWRC 19.15.040 Development
Application Submittal Requirements, Fxhibit F— Bulletin #053, Development Requirements for
Process I, Exhibit G Bulletin #054, Development Requirements for Process Il, and Exhibit
H— Butletin #001, Development Requirements for Process III or II!
(d) Pernrils and Review Processes - Chapter 19.15.045 Comp[eteness ojApplications
FWRC 19.15.045 identifies the timing and steps that the city must take when an application is
determined to be complete. Although state regularions. dictate norice of complete application for
specific procedural actions, the current code does not distinguish how different tand use
processes are treated with respect to completeness. The purpose of this amendment is to ctarify
that Process I, II, III, and IV land use processes aze subject to completeness standards.
In addition, this amendment is intended to clarify completeness review procedures. Use Process
I and Process II receive expedited eompleteness review at the time of application intake and the
Planning Commission StatF Repat
K:�2009 Code AmendmentslSubmittal requitemeats�Staff repat\Cucrent staff repoR with ex6ibitsGSTAFF REPORT cuaent with housdceeping amendmentdoc Page 2
appticant is provided with a"notice of completeness" at intake. However, Process III and N
applications receive completeness review during Development Review Committee (DRC)
deliberations that are scheduled within 28 days of receipt of the application. The applicant is
mailed a letter of completeness following DRC review. See Exhibit I— FWRC 19.15.045
Completeness o
(e) Permits and Review Processes — Chapter FWRC 19.15.030(1){� Review Processes for
improvements and additions to developed sites
A housekeeping amendment is being proposed to rep(ace the term "sensitive" areas with the
term "critical" areas and el'uninate references to the term "significant tree." The term
"sensitive" area was changed to "critical" area in a 2004 code amendment. The term "sensitive"
area currently found in FWRC 19.15.030(1)(fl was not changed as part of that 2004 code
amendment; this amendment corrects that oversight. Also, the term "significant tree" was
eliminated as a result of the 2009 code amendment for "Clearing, Grading and Tree and
Yegetation Retention. " The proposed change eliminates this term from FWRC t9.15.030(1)(fl
as it is no longer used in the FWRC. See Exhibit J— FWRC 19.15.030 Review processes for
improvements and additions to developed sites.
IV. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
The Project is procedurally exempt from State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review under
WAC 197-11-800(19) (Procedural Actions). Public Notice of the August 4, 2010, public hearing
was put�lished and posted on July 17, 201Q in accordance with the City's procedural requirements.
There were no puhlic comments.
V. DECISIOPIAL CRITERIA
FWRC 19.80.130 provides criteria for zoning text amendments. The following section analyzes the
compliance of the proposed zoning text amendments with the criteria provided by FWRC 19.80.130.
The City may amend the text of the FWRC only if it fmds that
1. The proposed amendments are consistent with the applieable provisions of the
comprehensive plan.
The proposed FWRC zoning text amendments are consistent with the fo(Lowing goals and
policies conta.ined in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP):
LUG2 Develop an efficient and timely development review process based on a public/private
partnership.
LUP4 Maximize efficiency of the development review process.
EDPI S The City will continue to implement a streamlined permitting process consistent with
sta.te and federal regulations to reduce the upfront costs of locating businesses in the
City.
EDP18 The City will periodica.11y monitor local and regional irends to be able to adjust plans,
policies, and programs.
HP9 Maximize efficiency in the City's development review process and ensure that
unnecessary time de[ays and expenses are eliminated. Continue to provide streamlined
permitting processes for development that is consistent with the FWCP and FWCC,
and that has no adverse impacts.
Planning Commission StatYRepixt
K:12009 Code Ameodmuus�Submittal roquiraaeatsiStaff report�Cuaent staff report wit6 exhibitslSTAFF REPORT curtent with housdcaping amendmenkdoc Page 3
HPIO Encourage community input, where appropriate, into the development permit process
by providing thorough and timely information to the public.
HPIl Continue to assist developers with housing proposals at the earliest possible
opportuc►ity, including preapplication meetings, to produce projects that can be
reviewed quickly and maximize their ability to receive permits.
2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or
wetfare.
The proposed FWRC text amendment bears a substantiat relationship to the public
health, safety, or welfare because it standardizes development regulations to provide
clarity about what constitutes a complete application; defines comp[eteness eligibility;
and refines various related codes in order to increase the efficiency of the development
review process.
3. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the City.
Approval of the proposed code amendment woutd benefit the City as a whole as it provides
clarity about what constitutes a complete application, which results in continued development
within the City, thus aiding the local economy and the housing market
VI. PLANNING COMMISSIOK REVIEW AND ACTION
Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.050(b), ttie City Couneil may review City-initiated changes to the text of
the zoning code from time to time at the Council's discretion. The Planning Commission is being
asked to review the proposed changes to the zoning code and forwazd a recommenda.tion to the City
Council. Chapter 19.80 FWRC, "Process VI Review," establishes a process and criteria for zoning
code text amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the role of the Planning Commission is to
review and evaluate the zoning code text regarding any proposed amendments; to determine whether
the proposed zoning code text amendment meets the criteria provided by FWIZC 19.80.130; and to
forward a recommendation to City Council regarding adoption ofthe proposed zoning code text
amendment. Consistent with the provisions of FWRC 19.80.240, the Planning Commission may take
the following actions regarding the proposed zoning code text amendments:
1. Recommend to City Council adoption of the FWRC text amendments as proposed;
2. Modify the proposed FWRC text amendments and recommend to City Council adoption of
the FWRC text amendments as modified;
3. Recommend to City Council that the proposed FWRC text amendments not be adopted; or
4. Forward the proposed FWRC text amendments to City Council without a recommendation.
VII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above staffanalysis and decisional criteria, staff recommends thax the fotlowing
amendments to FWRC Titte 18 Subdivisions, and to Chapter 19.15 FWRC Permits and Review
Processes as outlined in Section III above be recommended for approval to the City Council.
1. Amendments as set forth in Exhi6it A, to FWR.0 18.30.030, Content and form of
application. -
2. Amendments as set forth in Exhibit C, to FWRC 18.35.020, Content and form of
application.
Plaming Commission Staff RepoR
K:12009 Code AmeadmentslSubmittal requiromeots�Staffceport\Current staff ceport with exhibits�.STAFF REPORl' cu�reot wit6 hoatekeeping amendmenLdoe Page 4
3. Amendments as set forth in Exhibit E, to FWRC 19.15.040, Development Application
Submittat Requirements.
4. Amendments as set forth in Exhibit I, to FWRC 19.15.045, Comp[eteness of
Applications.
5. Amendments as set forth in Exhibit J, to FWRC 19.15.030, Review processes for
improvements and additions to developed sites.
EXHISiTs
Exhibit A, FWRC 1830.030 Content and form of application (Short subdivision)
Exhibit B, Revised Short Subdivision Handout
Exhibit C, FWRC 18.35.020 Content and form of application (Preliminary plat)
Exhibit D, Revised Prel"uninary Plat Submittal Requirements Handout
Exhibit E, FWRC 19.15.040 Development Application Submittal Requirements
E�chibit F, Checklist for Development Requirements for Process I, Director's Approval
Exhibit G, Revised Checklist for Development Requirements for Process II, Site Plan Review
E�chibit H, Revised Checklist for Development Requirements, Process III (Project Approval) or
Process IV (Hearing F,xaminer Approval)
Exhibit I, FWRC 19.15.045 Completeness oJapplications
Exhibit J, FWRC 19.15.030 Review processes for improvements and additions to developed sites
Planning Commission Staff Repat
K:�2009 Code AmendmentslSubmittal raqairanenca�Staff report\Cutrent staff repoR with exhibits�STAFF REPORT cucrmt with housekxping amend[nentdoc Page 5
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 18.30, "Short Subdivisions"
18.30.030 "Content and form of application"
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
_ _.. _. __ _ - - --
Exhibit A
18.30.030 Co�tenf and form of appiication.
All short subdivision apqiications must at the minimum provide the information
contained within Bulletin #010 Short Subdivision Submittal Rept�irements. The ;
submittal requirements are not intended to determine if an application conforms
to citv of Federal Way codes They are used only to determine if all required
materials have been submitted A code related review wiU oecur after a complete
application has been submitted The director mav waive anv sections determined '
to be not reasonablv necessarv.
�e-a�l�sa�ieq:
rlr �iin i� w c.n.�fe �f �r�e 'ni.F� renrec�er��c� �/1 fee� �+r I.�r�er nnrl �.h���lr� L�e
� �
wv
� > >
���': •
� + '
� � "
� � •
� i -
t "'� .
. , � +
i � �
��-
� > >
..nrl Tree .+.�rl \lene�.��i�n Da+er��i�r�
�. LiT� ... w . ...J. ........... . . ........ ...... .. !
f t �
� �
, �
, , , ,
, •,
Stf��Fifl�lAfi-
, , , ,
� ihe I..nr1 e.4�n.ai�R�,.`�7�rt^v°� ryr.��er� nnri In�ztinn_
� � .
� � i '
�
��e.e i+F �a��n i+f� fhe r�r�r� i�n e.h�rF �+� �L�tlu�ic�ie+q�
cr.sc ��—rrr��rrvi�:... ..
. + +
• ' ,.
. f r i
� � •
� � �
������7+e�e� ��
f �
�f�t�dVti1'CTV'3':
i �
r •
r
��iC�':
��
•�
��nie e. i� i ..r.i.�+mr�..nie.d hv +ho ren� �e��crl fod
...., ..... ............ ..� _••_ -_-�----=- ----
(Ord. No. 09-610, § 3(Exh. A), 4-7-09; Ord. No. 07-554, § 5(Exh. A(2)}, 5-15-07;
Ord. No. 97-291, § 3, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 90-41, § 1(16.150.10 —16.150.30), 2-27-
90. Code 2001 § 20-83.)
K�2009 Code Amudmeots�Submittal requiremm[slSroffreport�Curtmt uaff repoa wic6 ahibi[s�Exhibics r� B. G U�Exhibic A 18.2o short plaz.doc P� Z
EXHIBIT B
EXHIBIT TO PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 18.30, "Short Subdivisions"
Bullet�in O10 - Short Subdivision
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
�
CiTY OF
Federal �!�'a�
DEPAR'f�[ENf OF COMNiUNTfY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
33325 8`� Avenue South
PO Box 9718
Federal Way WA 98063-9718
253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609
www.cityoffederalway.com
SHORT SUBDIVISION
PURPOSE
A short subdivision (i.e., short plat) is the division or re-division of land into nine or fewer lots for the
purpose of sale, lease, or transfer of ownership. A short subdivision may be a conventional or cluster
subdivision, cottage housing, zero-lot line townhouse development, or smatl lot detached development of
nine or fewer lots, as we[I as a binding site plan. A short subdivision must be approved and recorded
before newly created lots may be legally sold.
HOW TO ARPLY
The applicant (owner or owner's appointed agent) files a complete application with the Department of
Community Development Services using the Master Land Use Application form availabte at the
depariment (and on our website, www.cityoffedera(way.com). The applicant also provides any information
or material as specified in the pmvisions of the Federal Way Revised Code (F WRC) describing the
decision applied for and any additional information or material that the�director determines is reasonab(y
necessary for a decision on the matter. Please refer to the following "Submittal Rec}uirements" section to
determine the materials that must be submitted to complete your application for a short subdivision.
PREAPPLlCQTION CONFERENCE
Applicants aze encouraged to schedule a preapplication conference to become familiar with FWRC
requirements, policies, and regulations. It is also an opportunity to coordinate with City departments and
obtain their comments on the proposed subdivision. Refer to the City's prea.pplication conference handout
for information on preapplication conferences.
WHO MAKES THE DECtSION
The d'uector will make the decision on the short subdivision. The application is processed under the
provisions of Chapter 18.30 FWRC, "Short Subdivision Plats." Your applicaxion will be evaluated on the
basis of the information you provide, the criteria listed in the pertinent sections of the City's regulaxions,
and inspection of the property. Short subdivisions shall be designed to the standards of FWRC 18.55.010
through 080, and 18.60.030 throagh 120. Upon determining that the short subdivision application is
complete, the director (or his/her designee) shall distribute a notice of complete application.
COMPLIANCE WITH SEPA
Short subdivisions aze usually exempt &om the Washington Sta.te Environmental Poticy Act (SEPA).
However, a SEPA checklist and corresponding fee will be required if any of the following is associated
with the short subdivision: 1) the site is subject to critical azea review; 2) the short subdivision requires
stormwater, sewer, or water tines larger than eight inches in diameter, 3) the short subdivision occurs on
K:�2009 Code Amadrtiass\Submival raryimneotslSraff repoctlCurrent snff rcport wich ad�ibits�Extribits A g. G D�Exlubit B- Bullecn O10 Shat Subdrvisioadoc Page I
land covered 6y water; or 4) the short subdivision is a further subdivision of a previously exempted short
subdivision. The director will determine the scope of the environmentat review required by the application
in order to comply with SEPA. For a detailed explanation of the City's environmental policy, cefer to
FVVRC Title 14.
CRITiCAI AREAS
Projects that involve work within criticat areas (e.g., wetIands, streams, steep slopes, and lakes) may
require that the City contract out for expert technical assistance. Pursuant to FWRC 19.150.030, the
applicant is responsible for providing any information, mapping, studies, and materiats, and for paying for
inspecrions or review by a qualified professional acceptabte to the City. You will be advised at an early
point in the process if your project wi(1 be subject to these types of expenses.
SHOREUNES ,
Short subdivision that are �rithin 200 feet of the ordinary high water mazk of Puget Sound, Steel Lake,
North Lake, or Lake Kiiarney require review under the city's Shoreline Master Program. Apglicants shQUld
speak with depamnent staff for fiuther informatiocc regazding shoreline regulations prior to submitting.a
formal application.
TRAEFIC-RELATED REQUIREMENTS
All short subdivisions are subject to transportation concurrency and Tra�c Impact Fee requirements. Refer
to Concurrency Application Informarion and Traffic Impact Fee handouts for additional information.
APPEALS
Any decision issued 6y the director can be appealed. The Ciry of Federal Way Hearing Examiner decides
appeals of short subdivision decisions after a public hearing. See FWRC 1830.140, et seq. for detaiied
information regarding appeals of short subdivision decisions.
RECORDING
The City records all approved short subdivisions with the King County Division of Records and Elections.
A copy of the documents (referred to as a short plat), stamped with the recording number, is then
distributed to the applicant, file, and King County Department of Assessments. All fees for such recording
must be paid by the applicant before recording.
Bulletin #O l0 —June 7, 20 t0 Page 2 of � k�Handouts\ShoR Subdivision
SHORT SUBDIVISION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
A complete application is required before the City can proceed with technical analysis and make an
informed decision on your application. Following is a list of materials that must be submitted with your
application. Please do not turn in your application until all items on the list that apply to your proposa.l
have been included. Consult with the Department of Community Devetopment Services if you have a
question. All application materials become public informarion.
GENERA! REQl11REMENTS
Submitted
A. Completed Master Land Use Application form including signature of persons with
ownership interest in the property. Agent authorization is required if application is not
si�ned by owners of all subiect parcels.
B. All application fees
C. Two copies of a computation sheet (with surveyor's seal) that provides the square footage
of all streets, individual lots and tracts, and total area contained within the subject parcels,
i.e. lot closure calculations.
D. Two copies of a ritle report for the subject property, prepared within 90 days, inctuding
any easements or restrictions affecting the properties with a description, purpose, and
reference by auditor's file number and/or recording number; parties of inteces� and any
restrictions or covenants r�nnin� with the property.
E. A copy of the current county quarter section map for the area. (These maps can be found at
F. Vicinity map on separate 8%a x 11 sheet
G. Two copies of certificate of water availability, signed within a year of the date of
application (only required for vacant property).
H. One copy of certificate of sewer availability, si�ed within a year of the date of
applicarioq imless the site is to be served by an on-site septic system. One copy of the
Seattle-King County Health Department approval of the proposed subdivision is required,
if the project is to be served by on-site septic system.
I. Site photographs from each compass point (north, east, south, & west) referenced
on the site plan
J. Two copies of preliminary engineering drawing showing the locarion and size of all
ditches, culverts, catchbasins, and other parts of the design for the control of surface water
drainage. (This is a separate sheet from the short plat map.)
K. Two copies of a preliminary ctearing and grading and tree/vegetation retenrion plans_
consistent with Chapter 19.120.040 FWRC, Clearing, Grading and Tree and Vegetation
Retenrion.
L. Two copies of a preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR), if required per the, 2009
Kin� County Surface Water Desil;n Manual (KCSWDN�.
M. Additional informarion as required by the Community Development Services and/or Public
Works Deparfinents.
N. Seven full size prints of the proposed short plat as specified below as well as one copy of
8-1/2 by 11 inch paper. One set of reproducible mylar drawings will be required after the
short alat is aonroved. nrior to sieaine and recordins.
Bulletin #O10 —June 7, 2010 Page 3 of � k�FlandoutslShort Subdivision
SEVEN COPIES OF FULL SIZE PLAIVS (A$SEMBLED IN SETS AND FOLDED TO 9 X 12���
The drawing sha(1 be 18" x 24"in size, drawn to a scale of 1"=50' or lazger on the City's standard short plat
title block form, and must comply with the provisions of RCW 58.09 and WAC 332-130. The drawing
shall include, bat is not limited to, the following information:
t.
2.
3.
4.
5_
6.
7.
9.
�
11
12.
13
Proposed name of the short subdivision. (You
may wish to check with the City to make sure the
name of the short plat has not been taken yet.)
Location by section, township, rauge, and/or
other legal description.
Name, address, and phone number of developer.
Name, address, and phone nnmber of each
property owner.
Name, address, and phone number of registered
land surveyor.
Scale of drawing, north arrow, and date
(subsequent resubmittals must have a revision
date). _
Bxisting topography of tlie� land'indicated 6y
contours of two-foot intervaLs for slopes less
than 15 percent and five foot intervats for stopes
of 15 percent or greater. Vertical Datum
(iWGD-29 or KCAS).
Location and extent of significant natural
features on a�d immediately adjacent to the site.
Such features shall include but are not limited to
streams, wetlands, views, stands of trees, and
water bodies to the extent that significant nattu�al
feah�res and/or their associated buffers affect the
short subdivision.
Comprehensive plan and zoning classification of
the proposed shoR subdivision site and adjoining
properties.
Adjacent ownerships and the land or lot divisions
of adjoining properties not in common
ownership for a distance of at least 100 feet
around the perimeter of the property proposed
for subdivision. A separate list of names may be
used for clarification purposes.
Location, widths, and names of existing or prior
streets, railroad, or utility rights-of-way or
easemenks, access easements, parks and other
public spaces, and existing permanent structures
to be retained within and adjacent to the
pmposed short subdivision. Where the property
has been previously subdivided, the original lots,
blocks, streets, easements, etc., shall be shawn
by dotted lines. Show distance between existing
structures to be retained and properly lines._
(Show pavement widths, p(anter strips,
sidewallcs, utility poles, etc.)
Existing and conceptually proposed water, sewer,
and drainage faciliries on, under, or over the
land showing size, grades, and locations.
Location and widths, and names of proposed
streets, utility right-of-ways, and easements.
14. Layout, number, lot sizes, and dimensions of
proposed lots. Inctude the square footage of each
lot.
15. Parcels of land intended to be dedicated for public
use, or reserved for use of owners of the property in
the short subdivision.
16. A statement explaining how open space shall be
provided. For a convenrionat short subdivision,
open space in the amount of 15 percent of the gross
land area of the subdivision site is required to be
provided. If the Ciry detecmines that the locaEion,
quality, or extent of the required open space would
not fulfill the intenf ar purpose of useful common
open space, a payment of an'equivalent fee-in-lieu
of the required project open space shall be paid
pursuant to FWRC 18.55,660(2),
17. Totai acreage of the site platted, prior to creation of
any tots, tracts, or other dedications.
18. Acreage prectuded from development due to the
presence of critical areas, including: wetlands,
streams, steep slopes, an� other features (along with
6uffers), brokea out by category, covered by critical
areas regulations.
19. Acreage dedicated for pubiic riahts-of-way (for both
newly created streets and expansions of existing
streets), as well as private tracts, alleys, and ingress/
egress and utilities easement created for the purpose
of provid'ueg access to lots within subdivisions.
20. Locarion and acreage of tracts (or other azeas)
dedicaxed for retenrion/detenrion/drainage facilities,
open space and parks, or other on-site public
facilities, broken out by category.
21. Calcularion of net plat area, which is gross plat area
minus critical areas, rights-of-way, private open
space, and public purpose Iands.
22. Building setback lines.
23. Typical roadway sections including streetlights and
street trees (existing and proposed).
24. Vicinity map with labeled streets and north arrow.
25. Basis of bearing, st�atement of equipment and
procedures used, indication of peritneter boundary,
lot, and right-of-way lines with a notation of
bearings or azimuth &om the north, distances, and
curve data, as well as the locarion and description of
all monuments, both found and set.
� Open space cequirements for cottage housing, zero-(ot line town house
development, and smait lot detached development can be found in
FWRC ts.55.060.
Z Public purpose !w►ds mean acreage of tracts (or other areas) dedicated
for cetention/detention/ drainage Eacili6es, open space and parks, or
otr�er on-site public facilities.
Bul(etin #OLO August 18, 2010 Page 4 of 5 klHandouts�Short Subdivision
26. Statement of equipment and procedures used.
27. Existing addresses, if applicable.
28. Indication of perimeter boundary, lot, and right-
of way (ines with a notation of bearings or
azimuth &om the north, distances, and curve
data.
29. Location and description of all monuments, both
found and set.
30. The City's file number will be assigned upon
apptication. Inc[ude the file number on subsequent
resubmittals.
Bulletin #O10 —August l8, 2010 Page � of S k:�fiandouts�Short Subdivision
E�:HIBIT C
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
FedeYal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 18.35, "Preliminary Plat"
18.35.020 "Content and form of application"
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
-- -- __.____ _ _
Exhibit C
18.35.020 Content and focm of application.
.. . . .. --- ----- _r.
Requiremenfs The su6mittaf requirements are not intended to determine if an
application conforms to citY of Fecferai Way codes. Thev are used onlv to
wilt occur after a complete application has been submitted. I ne airector mav
waive any sections determined to be not reasonablv necessarv.
, ,
.
. - - - - - _ _-
. - ■ - - - -
. -- - - - -
. . -�, - _ --
-
� - - - -
- - �� --
�-- --------- ---- - . • •_ ,
� - - - - - -- - - _
o �+c� em o r��n
l .. `� • . • � , � � ��� �. - '- ------
� – – –
� � � _ � ' –
� _ _ � _ _ _ � � _ _ _ _ – �
� _ � � �
� _ � _ � � �
♦ � � – – � _
� � � � � � � �
– � � � �
– � � _ _
K:�2009 Code 2�me.ndmenu�Submittal requirements\Staff report�Current ssaff report wich exhibits�EzGibits A, B. C. D�Exhibit C- t83i.020 Prdiminary Pla wbmitW rcq.doc
��'=
� -
. ,
,
}i�le ine.� ��-nnne nnmrt�nv
�
�
i(Ord. No. 09-610, § 3(Exh. A), 4-7-09; Ord. No. 07-554, § 5(Exh. A(2)), 5-15-Q7; '
Ord. No. 98-309, § 3, 1-6-98; Ord. No. 97-291, § 3, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 90-41,
'§ 1(16.50), 2-27-90. Code 2001 § 20-111.)
K12009 Code AmendmaMS�Submival roquitements\Staff repatlCurteot stsff repo[t with adiibits�E�ilrits A B. C, D1Ezhibit C- I8.35.0?A Prdiminary Pls wMnival rcq.doc
EXHIBIT D
EXHIBIT TO PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (FV�RC) Title 18.35, "Preliminary Plat":
Bulletin #037 - Preliminary Plat Submittal Requirements
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
�
�
CITY OF �
�ederalllllay
DEPARTMENT OF CON4�[UYITY DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
33325 8 Avenue South
PO Box 9718
Federal Way WA 98063-9718
253-835-2607;Fax 2�3-835-2609
www.citvoffederalwav.com
Preliminary Ptat Submiital Requirements
PURPOSE
A preliminary plat application allows the division or re-division of land into ten or more lots for the
purpose of sale, lease, or transfer of ownership. A preliminary plat may be a conventional or cluster
subdivision, cottage housing, zero-lot line townhouse development, or small lot detached development of
ten or more lots. A final plat must be approved and recorded before newly created lots may be legally sold.
(Refer to Final Plats Submittal Requirements handout for information on final ptats.)
HOW TO APPLY
The applicant (owner or owner's appointed agent) files a complete application with the Department of
Community Development Services using the Master Land Use Application form available at the
depa.rtment (and on our website, www.cityoffederalway.com). The applicant also provides any information
or material as specified in the provisions ofthe Federal Way Reuised Code (FWRC) describing the
decision applied for and any additional information or material that the director determines is reasonably
necessary for a decision on the matter. PZease refer to the following "Submittal Requirements" secrion to
determene the materials that must be submitted to be considered a complete pre(iminary plat application.
PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE
Applicants are required to scheduIe a preapplication conference to become familiar with FWRC
requirements, policies, and regulations. It is also an opportunity to coordinate with City departments and
obtain their comments on the proposed subdivision. Refer to the City's preapplication conference handout
for information on preapplication conferences.
WHO MAKES THE DECISION
The City Council makes the decision on the preliminary plat based on a recommendation from the Hearing
Examiner, who holds the public hearing. The preliminary plat application is processed under the provisions
of Chapter 18.35 FWRC, "Preliminary Plat" Your application will be evaluated on the basis of the
information you provide, the criteria listed in the pertinent sections of the City's regulatians, and inspection
of the property. Preliminary plats sha.Il be designed to the standazds of FWRC 18.55.010 to 080, and
18.60.030 to 120.
COMPLIANCE WRH SEPA '
Preliminary plats aze subject to the R/ashington State Environmenta.l Policy Act (SEPA). For a detailed
explanation of the City's environmental policy, refer to FWRC Title 14.
CRITICAL AREAS
Projects that involve work within critical ar�eas (e.g., wetlands, streams, steep slopes, and Lakes) may
require that the City contract out for exgert technical assistance. Pursuant to FWRC 19.150.030, the
applicant is responsible for providing any information, mapping, studies, and materials, and for paying for
inspections or review by a qua.lified professional accepta.ble to the City. You will be advised at the earliest
possible point if your project will be subject to these types of expenses.
SHORELINES
Subdivision that are within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mazk of Puget Sound, Steel Lake, North
Lake, or Lake Kilamey require review under the city's Shoreline Master Program. Applicants should speak
with department staff for further information regarding shoreline regulations prior to submitting a formal
application.
K12009 Code Ammdma�ts�Submittal rcquiranentslSqff teportlCurtmt sdffrepott with achibitslExMbits A g. C. D�Exiubit D- Bulletin 037 Prdimidcy Platdoc
TRAFFIC RELATED REQUIREMENTS
All preliminary plats are subject to transportation concurrency and Traffic Impact Fee requirements. Refer
to the concurrency information and Traffic Impact Fee handouts for additional information.
APPEALS
Any decision on a preliminary plat can be appealed to King County Superior Court. See FWRC 18.35.210,
for detailed information regaxding appeals of preliminary plat decisions.
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
A complete application is required before the City can proceed with technical analysis and make a
recommendation to the Hearing Examiner on your application. All checked items must be submitted to
constitute a complete application. Please note that a complete application does not imply compliance or
conformance with applicable codes. Please do not turn in your application until all items on the list that
apply to your proposal have been included. Consult with the Department of Community Development
Services if you have a question. All application materials become public information.
PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Required Submitted
A. Completed Master Land Use Application form including signature of persons with
ownership interest in the property. Agent authorization is required if application is not
signed by owners of all subject parcels.
B. All application fees including preliminary plat and SEPA fees.
C. Two copies of a current title report or plat certificate, prepared within the last 90 days,
(including any easements or restrictions affecting the properties with a description,
purpose, and reference by auditor's file number and/or recording number; parties of
interest; and any restrictions or covenants running with the property.)
D. A copy of the current King County Assessor's quarter section map for the area identifying
all properties within 300 feet of the proposed subdivision. (These maps can be found at
metrokc gov )
E. One 11 x 17 reduced copy of the preliminary plat map.
F. Notice of availability from the purveyor(s) of sewer and water signed within a yeaz of the
date of prelimin�ry plat application.
G. Copy of the preapplication summary letter.
H. Four copies of the project's Preliminary Technical lnformation Report (TIR) per the 2009
King County Surf'ace Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). T'he TIR must include a Level I
downstream analysis and must address relevance of the 8 Core and 5 Special Requirements
of the KCSWDM.
I. Four copies of critical areas studies, (i.e., geotechnical study, wetland delineation, wetland
mitigation, stream delineation, classification, critical aquifer recharge and wellhead
nrotection areas inventory, etc.) _
Four copies of a School Access Analysis.
. -
����"� �° ���� K. Four copies of special studies or requirements as requested in your preapphcation
� �� �� �'� ��<,� sumin letter.
``} `� ��'''�'�� L. Four co ies of Tri Generation or Tr ic Im act Anal srs IA , pre ared b an en eer
�'���� �� : P P � P Y � �' ) P Y �
` � �'�'�`,�`
�� licensed in the State of Washin on, as re uired b the Traffic Division.
Bulletin #O 10 — August 18, 2010 Page 2 of 4 k:�IIandouts\Short Subdivision
���`� °-� `� `�t, M. Seven copies of a landscape plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect idenrifying
�---�.�` � ;� existing wooded areas, meadows, rock outcroppings, proposed and required buffers, open
"�' spaces, street trees, ornamental landscaping, other landscape features, and stands of trees
and rotecfiion techni ues as ma be re uired er the FWRC.
N. Seven copies of a pretiminc�y clearing and grading and trePlvegetation reFention plan
consistent with Chapter 19.120.040 FWRC, Clearing, Grading and Tree and Vegetation
Retention.
O. Seven copies of a properry survey in conformance with FWRC 18.35.020(2), stamped by a
ticensed land surve or.
P. Seven copies, as applicable, of a phasing plan showing divisions of the plat and a proposed
timetable for construction of each divisioa
Q. Seven copies of a proposed preliminary plat drawn to scale of 1" ° l00' or targer (1:50 is
preferred), which includes the Preliminary Ptat Drawing Requirements listed on Page 5 of
- this handout
R Additional information as required by the Community Development Services and/or Public
Works De arlments.
Notice Requirements
Preliminary Pla� - A list of the names and addresses of all owners of real property, as shown
by the records of the county assessors located within 300 feet of any portion of the boundary
of the proposed subdivision and any adjo'ming reat properties owned by the owners of the land
proposed to be subdivided. If the owner of the properly which is proposed to be subdivided
owns adjacent property, the addresses of owners of property located wit�in 300 feet of any
portion of the boundaries of such adjacently located parcels must also be provided. Two sets
- of stamped envelopes with address labels for all owners described above.
SEPA — Provide one set of se[f-addressed, stamped business sized envelopes (with City of
�;.,; ' Federal Way return address) of persons receiving property tax statements for atl properties
� : within 300 feet of the boundary of the subject property. Include a separate List of the addresses
�=
���: ' with their parcel numbers and an assessor's map showing the 300-foot boundary.
���� >
� �a-
�:
KR � _ �
-t:
�� .�
�' - �: IMPORTANT — Please do not submit metered envelopes. The Federal Way Post
� � �- • `
���� � �� '�` Office may refuse such envelopes. In addition, you are highly encouraged to use the
-��... _ � " - = Forever stamps.
��..�.��
- ;:.
-. ,>._ �r.: x, _ `.��
Butletin #O10 — August 18, 2010 Page 3 of 4 k:�Handouts�ShoR Subdivision
PRELIMINARY PLAT DRAWING REQUIREMENTS
The preli,minary plat drawing shall include, but is not limited to, the following informarion:
l. Proposed name of subdivision. (You may wish to
check with King County to make sure that the
name of your plat has not yet been usecl}
2. Location by secrion/townshiplrange anc! legal
description.
3. Name, address, and phone number of the
developer.
16.
17.
use, or reserved for the use of owners. of tfie
property in the subdivision.
Building setback lines.
The tocation of all ditches, culvsrts, catch basins,
and other parts of the design for the control of
surface water drainage.
Typical roadway secrions, existing aad proposed,
including streetlights aad street trees.
A sta.tement explaining how open space shall be
provided. For conventional subdivisious, open
space in the amount of 15 percent of the gross land
area of ttte subdivision site is required to be
pmvided. If the City detemunes that the [ocation,
quality, or extent of the required open space would
not fulfill the intent or purpose of useful common
open space, a payment of an equivalent fee-in-lieu
of the required project opea sgace shall be paid
pursuant to FWRC 18.55.060(2).�
Total aareage of the site platted, prior to creation
of any lots, tracts, or other dedir.ations.
Acreage preciuded &om development due to the
presence of critical azeas, including: wetlaads,
streams, steep slopes, and other features (atong
with buffers), broken out by category, covered by
critical areas regularions.
Acreage dedicated for pubtic rights-of-way (for
both newTy created streets and expansions of
existing streets), as we[I as private tracts, alteys,
and in�ress/egress and utilities easement create�
for the purpose of providing access to lots within
subdivisions.
18.
4. Name, address, and phone number of each
property owner. 19.
5. Name, address, and phone number of registered
land sc�rveyor.
6. Scale o€ plat, date, and north arraw (subsequent
resubmittaLs must have a revision date).
7. Existing topography of the land indicated by
contours of twafoot intervals for slopes less than
15 percenC and five-foot intervals for slopes of 15.
percent or greater. Idenrify all slopes 40 percent or
greater on or within 25 feet of the site.
8. Locarion and extent of significant natural features
on and adjacent to the site. Such features include
stteains, wetlands, views, stands of trees, water
bodies, to the extent that the signifieant natural
feature and/or their associated buffers affect the
proposed plat.
9. Comprehensive plan and zoning classifications of
subject and adjoining properties.
l0. Adjacent common ownerships and the land or lot
divisions of adjoining pcoperties not in common
ownership for a distance of at least 100 feet aroimd
the perimeter of the property proposed for the
subdivision. A separate list of names may be used
for ciarification purposes.
11. Location, widths, and names of existing or prior
platted stieets; raiiroad, or utility rights-of-way or
easements; parks or other public spaces; and
existing permanent structures to be retained within
and adjacent to the proposed subdivisioa Where
the property has been previously subdivided, the
original (ots, blocks, sireet easements, etc., shall be
shown in dotted lines in scale with the proposed
subdivisioa Show distance between existing
structures to be retained and properly lines. (Show
pavement widths, planter strips, sidewatks, utility
poles, etc.)
12. Existing and conceptually proposed water, sewer,
anc! drainage utilities oq under, or over the land
showing size, grades, and location.
13. Locarions and widths of proposed streets, utility
rights-of-way and easements.
14. Layout, number, and dimensions of proposed Lots.
Include die square footage of each tot.
I5. Pazcels of tand intended to be dedicated for pub[ic
�0.
21.
�
23. Location and acreage of tracts (or other areas)
dedicated for retention/detention/drainage
faciliries, open space and parks, or other on-site
pubIic faciliries, broken out by category.
24. Net plat area, which is gross plat area minus
critical areas, rights-of-way, private open space,
and public purpose tands?
25. Vicinity map with labeled streets and north arrow
showing the proposed subdivision's relation to the
area.
26. List the height of all retaining walls and rockeries.
27. The City's file number wilt be assigned upon
application. Include the file number on subsequent
resubmittals.
`Opea space requirements for cottage housing, zeco-lot line town
house devdopment, and smait lot detached devetopment can be found
in FWRC i8.55A60_
Z Pnblic pw7wse Imtds mean acreage of �(or otkec azeas)
dedicated for retention/detention/drainage Cac�ities, open space and
parks, or other on-site public facilities. -
Bulletin #O l0 — August 18, 2010 Page 4 of 4 k:\E-Iandouts�Short Subdivision
EXHIBIT E
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.15 "Permits and Review
Processes"
19.15.040 "Development application submittal requirements"
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
Exhibit E
- --- _ _ -- - - - _ _ _-- --------- _ _ _----- - _-- --- _ - - -
19.15.040 Development application submittal requirements.
Ali use process I. Ii, III and iV applications �eiest� w�+
s�i�ed must at the minimum provide the information contained within Builetin
#053. Development Requirements for Process !. Bulietin #054. Develoament a
Requirements for Process ll or B�alletin #001 Develoament Re4uirements
Handout for Proeess !11 or !V dependinct on the particular Use Process beinq
apqlied for. The submittal requirements are not intended to determine if an
application conforms to city of Federal Way codes. They are used only to
determine if all required materials have been submitted. A code-related review
will occur after a complete application has been submitted. The director may
waive any sections determined to be not reasonably necessary.
, -- - - - -- -
• �, � ■-
_ ,� -
�. � • � �. � - - - - -
�, . � �. � - - `
_ _ „
-- - � - - - - - - -
� - - - -
� - - -- - - - - -
- - - � - -
■_ _ _ -
� --
a�. - - - -
, _ _ - -
� - - -
(C�2009 Code .�mpidmemslSubmittat raryiremmts\Statt'report\Curtau saffroport with aciubiMF.xlubits $ F G. H, [ ud J�Fxltibit E- revised I9.I5.040.doe
- - - � - - - -
. _ _ - -
. - - '� -
.. -- -
- - � -
� - - - - - - - - - _ - _ -
.. -- - - - - - -
, . - - - - -
.. .
� - - - - _- - - -
, .
�2�
�`}''�9t�-S�F�:
(Ord. No. 09-610, § 3(Exh. A), 4-7-09; Ord. No. 09-594, § 18, 1-6-09; Ord. No.
_97_291, § 3, 4-1-97. Code 2001 § 22-33.}_ _ _
K�2009 Code Amendments�Submittal rcquiremmts\Staff reportlCurtmt staff report with achibitslExhitius E, E G, H, [ aod J�F.xhibit E- revised I9.15.040.doc
EXHIBIT F
EXHIBIT TO PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19.15,
"Permits and Review Processes"
Bulletin #053 -
Development Requirements for Process I— DiYectors App�oval
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
�
CITY OF
������� ����
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
33325 8`� Avenue South
PO Box 9718
Federal Way WA 98063-9718
253-83�-2607;Fax 2�3-835-2609
www.cityoffederalway.com
DEVE�.OPMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR PROCESS I
Direcfior's Approval
Project Name:
Project Description:
Appliccnt/Agen#:
File No(s):
• This form is to be used by an applicant as a guide in determining what constitutes a comptete
application for Process I, Directors Approval.
• All checked items must be submitted to constitute a comptete application.
• Process I applications that contain all checked items will be determined complete at intake.
The applicant or agent will be notified immediately if an applicarion is considered complete.
• A complete application does not imply compliance or conformance with applicable codes.
How To APP�v
The appiicant (owner or owner's appointed agent) must file the fo[lowing items:
IZ uired Submitted
O E1 A. Master Land Use Application, with owner's signature
� � B. A detailed narrative description of the project, on a separate 8%z x 1 l sheet
� Q C!' ` C. Sia (folded) copies of the site plan
'L7 (� D. Application fees
If the project involves a new structure or changes to the exterior of an existing structure, also provide:
� Q
� �
E. Siac (folded) copies of existing and proposed building etevations
F. Color & maxerials indicators (color photos or color boazd and materials sample)
K:12049 Code Amendments�Submittal requirementslStaff repoR\Current staff report with exhibits�Exhibits E, F G, H, I and
]�Exhibit F- Bulletin 0�3 Process I Development Requiremenu.doc
WHEN USE PROCESS I(S USED
Reference to Process I is foand in various places in the Federa[ Way Revised Code (FWRC), indicating
that certain development, activities, uses, or interpretations are permitted only if approved using Process I.
Any Process I appiieation that is not exempf from the requirements of the. State Ernaironmental Policy Act
(SEPA) wiil be reviewed using the procedural requirements of Process III. See FWRC Title 19, Chapter
55, for a detailed explanation of Process L
WHO MAKES THE DECISION
Under Process I, the Director of Community Development Services makes the decision based on review
and analysis of decisional criteria and the official file. See FWRC 19:55.410 for decisional criteria.
APPEALS
Any decision issued by the director can be appealed. Appeals of Process I, Director's Decisiorr, are decided
by the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner after a public hearing. See FWRC 19.55.050 for detailed
information regacding appeals of Process I decisions.
,�.� �, �� ���.� ���.,� � ' �` � `��x
Bulletin #0�3 — August 18, 2010 Page 2 of 2 k:�E-Iandouts�Process I Development Requirements
EXHIBIT G
EXHIBIT TO PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19.15,
"Permits and Review Processes"
Bulletin #054:
"Development Requirements for Process II - Site Plan Review"
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
�
CITY OF
��e�e�a� �1�a�
DEPARTMENT OF COMhiUN1TY I?EVELOPMEIVT SERVICES
33325 8`� Avenue South
PO Box 9718
Federai Way WA 98063-9718
253-835-2607; Fa�c 253-835-2609
www.citvoffedera(way.com
DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR PROCESS il
Stre Pu►nt REViEw
Project Name:
Project Description:
Appiicant/Agen�
Fie No(s):
• This form is to be used by an applicant as a guide in determining what constitutes a complete
application for Process II, Site P1an Review.
• All checked items must be submitted to constitute a complete application.
• Process II applications that contain aU checked items will be determined complete at intake. The
applicant or agent will be notified immediately if an application is considered comptete.
• A complete application does not imply compliance or conformance with applicable codes.
Process t! Submittal Checklist
K:�2009 Code AmeadmaitslSubmitial reqairmtmtsCSwffrepott�Curttot uaff reporc with oclubiu�F.xlubits E, F G. t'f. [ and J�Euhibit G- Proeess Q Development Reqs poor famatdoe
General Plan Standards for Process II
• Eight complete and folded sets of drawings (folded to 9 x 12 inches).
• Minimum plan sheet size shall be 24 x 36 inches.
• Plans must be drawn at an engineering scale that allows the entire plan to fit on one sheet.
• Minimum scale is 1:20 unless otherv�rise authorized.
• All information is to be legible.
• Plans shall be prepazed by a certified professional (licensed in the state of Washington) unless
otherwise authorized. Note: If the development pro�osal has a value of $75 000 or sreater, the site
survey, site ptan areliminarv draina�e adin��ht-of-wav alans and buildin� elevation nlans shatl
be pre�ared b�,a certified professional licensed in the state of Washin�ton. The survev shall be
pre�ared by a certified Land surveyor and the site plan dra.ina�� �c'adin� ri�ht of-wav atans, and
buildin� elevations bv a certified azchitect ar engineer RaQardless of the vatue of the developmen�
landsca�e plans must be pre�ared by a Washin¢t�n State licensed (andscape architect.
Submitted
;, � :
H. Topo9raphic survey
• Project name, plan date, and/or revision date(s)
• Name, phone number, and license stamp of preparer
• North arrow and bar scale
• Site area
• Propecty lines, uxilities, easements, sidewalks, street edges, existing structuces, pazking,
and site improvements (e.g. drainage systems with pipe sizes, invert and rim
eievations)
• Stract�u�es and driveways within I50 feet of subject site (on both sides of street)
• Minimum two foot contours for slopes less than IS percent and five foot contours for
slopes 15 percent or greater; datum shall be King County Aerial Survey or NGVD-29
+ Delineate slopes �reater than 40 percent grade on or within 25 feet of the site
• Delineate streams, ponds, wetlands, natura.l draina.ge courses, and other surface water
feadues on or within 200 feet of the site per Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title
14, Chapter 30, "Critical Areas"
• Identifv trees defined by FWRC 19A�.200
Bultetin #0�4 — August 18, 20(0 Page 2 of 6 k:/Handouts/Process [I Development Requirements
K�2009 Cod¢ �bmiasl �quiranasslStaff reportlCu�ra�t stsff report wirh ad�ibits�Exhbi�s H. F C; E� [ and J�xhibit G- Proeesc Q Devdopmmt Reqs poor formu.doc
:'' � .M
L Site plan
+ Project name, plan rlate, and/or revision data(s)
• Name and phone number of owaer/agent
• Name, phone number, aad license stamp of preparer
• North arrow and bar scale
• Vicinity map
• Site azea
• Total parking sta.lt count
• Total gross floor area of all proposed floors or levels
• Locatian and dimensions of existing/proposed structures, property lines, sidewa(ks,
easements, parking tayout, street edges, mechanical equipment, trash enctosures,
outdoor uses, storage areas, fencing, rockeries, and retaining walls
• Existing streams, ponds, wetlands, natural drainage courses, and other surface water
features on or within 200 feet of site per FWRC Title 14, Chapter 30, "Criticat Areas"
• Location of stands of trees as defined by FWRC 19.05.200
• Existing and proposed utiliries including: utility poles and boxes, water, storm sewer,
sanitary sewer, and fire hydrants
� Structures and driveways within 150 feet of subjeet site (on both sides of street)
• IBC construction type and occupancy classification
• Location and square footage calculations of any on-site pedestrian areas (i.e., plazas,
courtyards) or open space areas
� Show locarion and calculate acrea,ge �recluded from development due to the nresence
of critical areas including wetlands streazns steep slopes. and other features (alone
with buffersl broken out by cat�,orv covered b�critical areas re�,ulations. as
applicable.
• Show (ocation and calculate acrea�e dedicated for pub(ic ri�hts-of-way (for both newlv
created streets and ex�ansions of existin s�l as wel( as private tracts, allevs, and
in�ess/e�ress and utilities easement broken out bv cate�orv,
� Show location and calcutate acreag�e of tracts (or other azeas) dedicated or set aside for
retention/detention/drainag�,e facilities oaen�ace or other on-site public facilities,
broken out bv cate�orv_
• Provide net site area. which is �ross area minus critical aceas, rights-of-wav. nrivate
-- - ' - '-"- ------ �--�- t
�' `� J. Preliminary drainage, grading, and right-of-way plan
=-�� "` ,� �; • Project name, plan date, and/or revision date(s)
E • Name, phone number, and license stamp of preparer
• North arrow anc! bar scale
• Preliminary storm drainage system in accordance with the 2009 King County Surjace
� Y t Water Design Manual (KCSWDNn as amended by Fedecal Way
• Preliminary grading plan with finished contours; minimum two foot contours for slopes
less than IS percent and five foot contours for slopes IS percent or greater, datum sha(1
� =-� be King County Aerial Survey or NGVD-29
i ��
� k �, • Preliminary right-of-way improvement plan, as required by the Public Works Dept
��,�� p • Approximate cut & fill quaatities of site earthwork
� �� _` � Total existing and proposed impervious surEace azea
:� �� f- ^� - • Existing and proposed utilities inctuding: utility po(es and boxes, water, storm sewer,
- sanitarv sewer. and fire hvdrants
� Public purpose lands mean acreage of tracts (or other areas) dedicated for retention/detenrion/drainage faciliries, open space and
parks, or other on-site pub(ic facilities.
Bulletin #054 — August 18, 2010 Page 3 of 6 k/HandoutslProcess II Development Requirements
KVA09 Code Amadma�tslSubmittal re9uiremnuslScaff report�Currmt staff ceport witlt eiddb"uslHzhibicv E. F G. K[ sad I�Eztriba G- Proeess [I UcvduPment Reqs Pow Co�mat.doc
K. Pretiminary landscape plan
�' Q• • Project name, plan date, and/or revision date(s)
• Name, phone number, and ticense stamp of preparer
• North arrow and bar scale
• Specific location, type, size, and number of trees to remain and to be removed
• P(ant schedule with the scientific name, common name, size, spacing, and quanrity of
each
• Specific tocation and square footage calculations of drou;ht tolerant landscaping
(document that a minimiun 25 percent is pmvided per FWRC 19.12�.040[6j)
• [rrigation plan for lawn areas
• Specific location, square footage calculations, and totat square Eootage of each parking
. lot landscape island per FWRC 19.125.070(2)(a)
• Screening of outdoor facilities such as: trash/recycting enc(osures, outdoor storage,
drive through facilities, stormwater faciliries, and �round based mechanical equipment
• Building watl area landscaping per FWRC 19.125.040
• Specific tocation of street trees in the right-of-way
;�.;�, y u �. �:� • Identi rimeter lands e e as I II, or III
�> � j � ` . :' L. Building elevations
'� '� �`�� • Pro ect name, tan date, andlor revision date(s)
{ ���'�� �� • Name, phone number, and license stamp of preparer
; ,� ��� � � �,�-.
� # ' • Bar scale
: ,� �".� h ,
<�`���' • Sta.tement of azclutectural design intent, finish materials, and colors
��,�� ��� � • Front, rear, and side (labeled as north, sonth, east, and west) building elevations of
� '�, �, ,: proposed structures
� Exterior wall opecungs
'yr ' y Y � � "�`� �
� `� £ ��'£ �;; . -
_ Exterior materials and colors board
• Gazbage/recycling €acility screen details
• Roof-top and ground based mechanical equipment screen details
, . • Buildin hei t calcutation
M. Clearing and grading�plan
�' ;.:Q _ • Project name, plan date, and/or revision date(s).
• Name. �hone number, and license stamp of preparer.
- • North arrow and bar scale.
• Identification of existin�slope depicting; azeas with 0% to 15% slone: azeas with 15%
to 40% slope: and areas of 40% or �areater slope.
• Proposed erades.
• Location of all existing ancUor pro�osed structures, driveways, rieht-of-wav
improvements utiliries and easements on the subLect �ropertv
• Desi�ation of all wetlands streams and other critical areas that are on or within 300
feet of any area �ronosed to be disturbed bv the proaosed clearing and/or sradin�
- action
• Areas proposed for clearing�and the pr000sed use for such areas. _
• Any_proposed de chang�es that adversely affect or endan�er trees on the nronerlv
- - and/or adjacentproperties and specifications to mainta.in them.
• A minimum of two cross sections of the site drawn to scate depicting the existine and
proposed grade and anYpmnosed rockeries and/or retaining walls. The director mav
also require a three dimensional topoeranhic �nodel of existing and proaosed
topographic conditions.
• Location and descri�tion of pro�osed erosion control devices and structures,_
• When require a�eotechnical report nrepared by a Qeotechnical en�ineer, that
contains sut�icient information to determine the potential im.,pacts of the proposed
clearing and �radine as well as�roposed measures to reduce or e(iminate these
im acts.
Bulletin #054 — August l8, 2010 Page 4 of 6 k:/Handouts/Process [I Development Requirements
K1Z009 Code Ao�hmaeslSuborttal +equice�omtsVStaff cepwdCumme st��epat web�ndu�ics E. F G. FC [ and 3�Exhibic G- Procm Q Deadopmmt 6laqs Poor formacdoe
::.� �
3
�
��
� �
�� �
�
k
N. TreeNeg etation Retention Plan
I • Projgct name plan date and/or revision date(s).
• Name phone number and license stamp of grenarer who shall be a ce�tified arborist
or a certified landscape architect.
- • North arrow and bar scale.
• Statement autlinin�the p�poses of any.nroposed tree removal (e.e.. buildins
construcrion. street or roadway driveway, recreation area. �atio. or nar(cins lot),
toeether with a proposed timetable for when this work witl occur.
' • A tree survev thax identifies the location aoaroximate size, snecies. and number of
- trees on this site and atso identifies the general locarion of trees within 50 feet of the
_ site Tree survey sam�es may onlv be used at the discretion of the director.
- • A depicrion of the sparial limits for tree/ve�gtation retention areas and details of
tree/ve et; tation protection measures.
• A depiction of any new veseta.ted areas to be established.
• The manner in which the cteazed areas on the proaertv will be reclaimed with
veeetation, specification or any rec�uired miti�arion plantinQS and a timetabie for
re�lantin�.
• �proved tree/ve�etation retention�lan shall be incorporated into the clearine and
Bulletin #0�4 — August 18, 2010 Page 5 of 6 k:/Handouts/Process I[ Devetopment Requirements
K:�2009 Code Amendments\Submittat requirements\Staff report\Current staff repon with exhibits�Exltibits E, F G, H, I and 11Eslilbit G- Process II Developmrnt Reqs poor format.doc
Special studies and additional information for Process II.
Bulletin #054 — August 18, 2010 Page 6 of 6 k:/Handouts/Process II Development Requirements
EXHIBIT H
EXHIBIT TO PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19.15,
"Permits and Review Processes"
Bulletin #001 - Development Requirements:
Process III (Project Approval) or Process IV (Hearing Examiner Approval)
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
CITY OF �
���dt'��� ��'a�/
DEPARTb[EN"f OF COhiMUMTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
33325 8�' Avenue South
PO Box 9718
Eederal Way WA 98063-9718
253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
www.cityoffederalwav.com
��VEi.�P�i��T RE�2UiREIV1E�iTS
❑ PROCESS III (PROJECT APPROVAL� ❑ PROCESS IV (HEARtNG EXAMINER APPROVAL�
Name:
Fite No(s):
• This form is to be used by an applicant as a a ide in determining what consritutes a complete application.
• All checked items must be submitted to constitute a comptete application.
• Applicant will be notified of a complete application withia 28 da.ys.
• A complete application does not imply compliance or conformance with applicable codes.
• Additional fees may be required for consultant review of critical areas.
General Ptan Standards
• Eight complete and folded sets of drawings (folded to 9 x 12 inches). �
• Minimum plan sheet size shatl be 24 x 36 inches.
• Plans must be drawn at an engineering scale that allows the entire plan to fit on one sheet
• Minicnum scale is l to 20 uatess otherw'tse authorized.
• All information is to be legible.
• Plans shall be prepared by a certified professional (licensed in the state of Washington) unless otherwise authorized.
• If the devetopment proposal has a value of $75 000 or ereater the site survey site plan,,,preliminazv drainage grading�
�� t-of wa.�plans and building elevation plans shalI be �repared by.a certified pcofessional licensed in the staxe of
WashinQ;ton The survey shall be �renared bv a certified land surveyor and the site plan. drainaQe. eradins. risht-of-wav
plans and building elevations b�a certified architect or en� ineer Regardless of the value of the developmen� landscave
plans must be prepared by a Washington State licensed landscape architect.
Re uiced Submitted
;E� �' _= A. Completed Master Land Use application, with owner's si�ature
;� Q: �;' B. Application fees includin� SEPA fees as applicable.
�# .. � ; �
�� _ ��;.-; C. Copy of enfire undertying plat or King County Assessor s parce( map
<:� ;,��� � D. Vicinity map on separate 8%2 x 11 sheet
k Y >,I ..
�� ��'; E. Two copies of current title report for subject property �
- ' 4 F. Two copies of current letters of water and sewer availability (only required for vacant
�� - ��
��..,?��� < < �,�,��, : r � ro e .
�,. ,��� 4.
��� ��� " G. Ei ht co ies of site hoto hs &om each com ass int nocth, east, south, & west
�� �� � t�. �;� = g P P �P P P� � �
�� '�' �� ��, r -�� V referenced on the site plan
��
��* � �. � � <
�
�� � k� � .' H. Concurrency application
Bullerin #001—August 18, 20t0 Page 1 of 5 k:/E[andouts/Development Requirements
K�2009 Code Amadmattsl5ubmittai rcqu'vemrntslStaff report�C�urent staff report with ulu'bits�Extnbits E. F G. H. t and J�Exhibit H- Devdopmem Roquiranen[s poor Forcnatting.dce
' I. Topographic Survey
� • Project name, plan date, and/or revision date(s)
• Name, phone number, and license stamp of preparer
- • North arrow and bar scale
� � Site area
€ �� '` • Property lines, utilities, easements, sidewallcs, street edges, existing siructures, parking, and
s�
site improvements (i.e. drainage systems with pipe sizes, invert and rim elevations, etc)
�u::--� • Structures and driveways within 150 feet of subject site (on both sides of street)
����� -' • Minimum two foot contours for slopes tess than IS percent and five foot contours for slopes
��
�,,��;;,, ,-, ,;'" 1� percent or greater, datum shall be King County Aerial Survey or NGVD-29
,,;: • Delineate slopes greater than 40 percent grade on or within 25 feet of the site
�; • Delineate streams, ponds, wetlands, natural drainage courses, aad other surEace water
�� ��.� features on or within 200 feet of the site per Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter
� ���
;-;� � 1430, "Crirical Areas"
'V ��` • Identi trees as defined b FW[ZC 19.05_200
J. Site Plan
��;;� • Project name, plan date, and/or revision date(s)
���1: � . ,
� pF�-����= • Name and phone number of owner/agent
��=,� �_,. • Name, phone num6er, and license stacnp of preparer
�. �
�= '� a • North arrow and baz scale
�''`' n.,�;� • Vicinity map
�
• Site area �
` Total parking stall count
�;� . .
i_ • Total gross floor area of all proposed floors or levels
.� • Location and dimensions of existing/and or proposed siructures, property lines, sidewallcs,
';:r. :�:: :x; easements, pazking layout, street edges, mechanical equipment, trash enclosures, outdoor
����:. uses, stnrage areas, fencing, rockeries, and retainiug walls
• Existing sheams, ponds, wetlands, natural drainage couises, and other surface water
��' � features on or within 2U0 feat of site per FWRC Chapter 1430, "Critical Areas"
� �:: • Location of stands of trees as defined by FWRC 1�.05:200
���� � �
�� :.�� .
• Existing and proposed utilities including: utility poles and boxes, water, storm sewer,
sanitary sewer, and itre hydrants
� Structures and driveways within 1�0 feet of subject site (on both sides of street)
• Internationa! Building Code (iBC) construction type and occupancy classification
� Location and square footage calculations of any on-site pedestrian areas (i.e., plazas,
courlyazds) or open space azeas
- • Indicate any,proposed phasing pro�osed timelines for full completion.
• Show location and calculate acrea�,e nrecluded �om development due to the presence of
��, critical areas including• wettands streams steep slo�es. and other features fa(ona with
buffers) broken out bv cateeorv covered bv critical areas re�ulations.
° • Show [ocation and calculate acreaee dedicated for pnbtic ri� ts-of-wav (for both newlv
created streets and ex�ansions of existin� streets) as well as private tracts, allevs, and
ineress/e�ess and utilities easement broken out bv cateeorv.
� Y • Show location and calculate acrea� e of tracts (or other areasl dedicated or set aside for
�;�3 retenrion/detention/drainaae facilities �en space or other on-site public facilities, broken
� �'� ` � ' ` out bv category
� ��,��
�,�� • Provide net site area. which is eross area minus critical azeas. ri�hts-of-wav. orivate onen
� ��
������ ' snace. andpublic purpose lands.
,.� ;.F �`�x ,_
� Public purpose lands mean acrea.ge of tracts (or other areas) dedicated for retention/detention/drainage facilities, open space and parks, or
other on-site public facilities. __
Bulletin #001— August 18, 2010 Page 2 of � k:/Handouts/Development Requirements
K:12009 Cade Ama�dmaus�Submittal reqwrm�a¢s�Staffreport\Curtcu staff report wiW ulabiu�EzAibits E. F G. EI. [ and 11Exltibi[ H- Da'duPmeot Requircm�^�s Poor f°�mam°�doc
R uired Submitted
_-� , K. Preliminary Drainage, Grading, aad Right-of-Way Plan
���� �x _ �� � • Project name, plan date, and/or revision date(s)
�����. ; 5 • Name, phone number, and license stamp of preparer
� �.
t t • North arrow and bar scale
��������� ��_� F,�,._ • Preliminary storm drainage system in accordance with the 2009 King County Surface Water
, - ;'��; p; Design �fanual (KCSWDM}, as amended by Federal Way
�� ;� �� � = • Preliminary grading plan with finished contours; minimum t�+o foot coatours for stopes less
�a �t s� :
�. ,.�.� . than 15 percent and five foot contours for slopes 15 percent or greater; datum shall be Kin;
���`n�� County Aerial Survey or NGVD-29
_� Preliminary right-of-way improvement plan, as required by the Public Works Dept
r �.,,��� s •
-; �� ^���k �;�; • Approximate cut & fill quanrities of site earthwork
, y � { �:
�� ��3� }�; • Total existing and proposed impervious surEace area
$: �»�- � � �r.~
'� -"� .� � • Existing and proposed utilities includin� utility poles and boxes, water, storm sewer,
' �
�- �� �" sanitary sewer, and fire hydrants
,.. M,��" 4. �;� t ;�
�, " � ` ,��" , � �� L. Preliminary Landscape Plan
ti `� ��' " Pro ect name, plan date, and/or revision date(s)
� .-� -��� � �: ' .1
-. y • Name, phone number, and licease stamp of prepazer
��-� �F • North arrow and bar scale
;� �� -�-,�, � :
�� ,_x., - ��,��; • Specific locatioa, type, size, and number of trees to remain and to be removed
� ;; �
� • Plant schedule with the scientific name, common name, size, spacing, and quantity of each
�� ��� • Specific location and square footage calculations of drought toterant landscaping (document
�- .
�� .� " that a minimum 25 percent is provided per FWRC 19.125.040[6])
'�� • Irrigatioa plan for tawn areas
-.�: y� � • Specific location, square footage calculations, and total square footage of each parking lot
;� 1� - �
� �,� landscape island per FWRC 19.125A70(2)(a)
}�r�- � j�� ,� • Screening of outdoor facilities such as: trasWrecycling enclosures, outdoor storage, drive
�:�,��`"`�°��� `�' through faciliries, storazwater faciliries, and ground based mechanical equipment
'�� - • Building wall area landscaping per FWRC 19.125.040
��� >��' • Specific locadon of street trees in the right-of-way
-� ��^� �.
;.::�.�,r�� � • Identify perimeter landscape type as I, II, or III
:n
�. z���-�� -, � L
��,`��,�' � ; ; M. Building Elevations/Design Intent
�,
� Q-� • Project name, plan date, and/or revision date(s)
�� • Name, phone number, and license stamp of preparer
r �;� • Bazscale
��� -;��
��: ; �. • Statement of architectural design intent, finish materials, and colors
`� ��`'� � Front, rear, and side (labeled as north, south, east, and west) building elevations of proposed
�., � ,,, : .
g� � - _
� � stn.eatures
�� ��� � � � t
�� � ;� . � � � • Exterior wall openings
�� y • Exterior materials and colors board
��� y 4 ': ,_ • GarbageJrecycling facility screen details
��'` '� �' ,.. . • Roof-top and ground based mechanical equipment screen details
�� � ; -
#�, �; � � � � • Building height catculation
t
��'�� T� • Narrarive summary of how project complies with applicabte design guidelines (FWRC
���� r � � x � � a , k .; Chapter 19.115, "Community Design Guidelines")
��� �a��: , z.
<- �-
� -� ��� �� ,, �,,� _; N. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist
�° -'� ����� • Eight copies of the completed, signect, and dated SEPA checklist
,. �� �
�,f , �:<
�'°`��., � " .� . _ �
Butletin #001- August 18, 2010 Page 3 of � kJHandouts/Development Requirements
K�2009 Code A�dma�s�Submittal rMMuiremmts�Svff c�t�C�rak sWff report wit6 a�abitslExhibits E. F G. H. [ aad J\EsFnbit H- Davebpment Ra�wrommcs Poar fornuttu'8.doc
Re aired Submitted
; � ' <_ �
��� �`
= �� �
���, �_- �� �
,� , � �s:.
�� ���
� � � �� �; {
_��
�� � � � �� .�
�
�
. .
k: ,. � '�rr..-��� �
� �. ;
�� n '
� _� �� ����� ��
_ �,,� � __
—%Y �
?:v '� .x,�x: z r -
�
�
y -
'� +TP
u 3, �! _.�-:� .. . . .
O. Clearing; and g�acl'tn�plan
• Project name. plan date_ and/or revision date(sl.
• Name. phone number. and license stamp of preparer•
• North arrow and bar scale.
• Identificarion of existing s[ope depictin�: areas with 0% to 15% slope: azeas with 15% to
40% stope: and aceas of 40% or greater slope.
• Proposed gr�
• Location o�all existin� pro�osed structures. driveways. riaht-of-wav imnrovements.
utilities. and easements on the subject prouertv.
• Desi�nation of atl wetlands. streams, and other crirical areas that are on or within 300 feet
of anv area proposed to be disturbed by the pronosed clearin� and/or a�d'� action.
• Areas proposed for clearin� and the proposed use for such azeas.
• Any proposed e chan�es that adversely affect or endanger trees on the property and/or
adjacent properties. and speciHcations to maintain them.
• A minimum of two cross sections of the site, drawn to scale, depicting the existin�and
proposed grade and anyproposed rockeries and/or retainin� walls. The director may also
require a three dimensional toposraphic modet of existin�and proposed topog�aphic
conditions.
• Locarion and description of proposed erosion control devices and structures.
• When required a Ceotechnical re�ort, prepared bv a geotechnical engineer. that contains
sufficient information to determine the potenfial impacts of the proposed clearin�; and
P. TreeNe�etation Retention Plan
• Project name. nlan date_ and/or revision datefsl.
• Name. phone number. andlieense stamp of pre�arer. who shall be a certifiect arborist or a
certified landscape arclutect.
• North arrow and bar scale_
�` timetable for when this work will occur.
• A tree survey that identifies the location. a��roximate size. species, and number of trees on
this site and also identifies the ,�eneral location of trees within 50 feet of the site. Tree
survev samples mav onlv be used at the discretion of the director.
• A clepicrion of the spatiat limits for tree/veQetation retention areas and details of
tree/ve etation protection measures.
• A deniction of anv new vegetated azeas to be established.
• The manner in which the cleared areas on the propertv witl be reclaimed with veeetation.
specifcation or anv req,uired �nitigation plantings, and a timetable for replantin�,
• AQproved tree/veQetation retention ptan shall be incorporated into the clearin� and �adin�
.. rlrawinvc fnr final cnnctrrmtinn rinenmPntatinn
Bulletin #00 t— August 18, 2010 Page 4 of 5 k:/Handouu/Development Requirements
K�2009 Code Amadmaits�Submittal «quiranaits�Snff report\Cuna�t staff repat with a�3its1Exlu'biu E. F G. EI.1 and 11Exhibit H- Devdopmaa Raquiranwct pow fomutting.doe
Special Studies and Additional Information
Please provide FOUR copies of the following:
Level One Downstream storm drainage analysis as described in the KCSWDM, as
amended by Federal Way
Preliminary technical information report addressing relevance of the 8 Core and 5 Special
Reauirements of the KCSWDM
an en�ineer licensed in State of W,
Traffic imnact analysis an engineer licensed in State of W
as required by the Traffic Division.
Noise
Geotechnical study
Wetland delineation report
Wetland mitigation plan
Stream delineation and classification
Critical aquifer rechar�e & wellhead protection areas i
Other information relating to design and siting of proposed development (including site
cross sections)
information to determine compliance with city goals, policies, and regulations
Notice Requirements
Process III — For applications that are located within, or are, 300 feet from properties
zoned SE, RS, or RM, provide one set of self-addressed, stamped business sized envelopes
(with City of Federal Way return address) of persons receiving property t� statements for
all properties within 300 feet of the boundary of the subject property. Include a separate list
of the addresses with their parcel numbers and an assessor's map showing the 300-foot
boundary. .
Process IV — Provide two sets of self-addressed, stamped business sized envelopes (with
City of Federal Way return address) of persons receiving property tax statements for all
properties within 300 feet of the boundary of the subject property. Include a separate list of
the addresses with their parcel numbers and an assessor's map showing the 300-foot
boundary.
SEPA — Provide one set of self-addressed, stamped business sized envelopes (with City of
Federal Way return address) of persons receiving property tax statements for all properties
within 300 feet of the boundary of the subject property. Include a separate list of the
addresses with their parcel numbers and an assessor's map showing the 300-foot boundary.
IMPORTANT — Please do not submit metered envelopes. The Federal Way Post Office
may refuse such envelopes. In addition, you are highly encouraged to use the Forever
stamps.
Bulletin #001— August 18, 2010 Page 5 of 5 k:/Handouts/Development Requirements
K:�2009 Code Amendmenis\Submittal requ'vements�Staff report\Currmt staff report with exhibits�Exhibits E, F G, H, [ and l�E�dubit H- Development Requirements poor fortnatting.doc
EXHIBIT I
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19.15, "Permits and Review
Processes"
19.15.045 "Completeness of applications"
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP}
Exhibit I
19.15.045 Completeness of applications.
(1) Use Process I and Use Process !1. At the time of intake of a complete use
process I or use process II apqlication a notice of completeness as referenced in
FV1/RC 19 15 040 shall be provided to the applicant This notice shall indicate the
date the apq�ication is deemed complete If the citv determines that the use process I
or use process II application is incomplete the Citv shall notifv the ap plicant of what
needs to be submitted for a complete use p�ocess I or use process II application.
,
, . . .
,
, ,� ,
ap�a#+s� In the notice of application, if reauired, �"�° ..,.��°^ �'°�°�^��^^+�^^, the city
shall also identify, to the extent known to the city, the other agencies of local, state,
or federal government that may have jurisdiction over some aspect of the proposed
development activity.
(2) Use Process lll or Use Process IV. Within 28 calendar days of receivinq an
application for use process III or use process IV the city shall determine whether the
application is complete as referenced in FWRC 19.15.040. If found to be complete.
prior to the 28-dav deadline a letter of completeness shall be issued indicatinq the
date the use process III or use process IV application is deemed complete. If the citv
determines the application to be incomqlete prior to the 28-day deadline, the citv
shall notify the applicant of what needs to be submitted for a complete use qroeess
III or use process IV application In this written determination, the citv shall also
identify to the extent known to the citv the other agencies of local, state, or federal
government that may have jurisdiction over s�me aspect of the proposed
development activitv. If the use process III or use process IV a� application was
found incomplete and an applicant submits additional information, the city shall notify
the applicant in writing within 14 days, the date the application is deemed complete
or whether further additional information is necessary.
(3) Additional information. A determination of completeness shall not preclude the
city from requesting additional information or studies, either at the time of the letter of
completeness or subsequently, if new information is required or if there are
substantial changes in the proposed action.
(4) Vesting. A proposed use process I, II, III, or IV application shall vest to and be
considered under the zoning code and other land use control ordinances in effect on
the land at the time a fully completed application for use process I, I1, III, or IV has
been submitted to the city. In the event that the application is deemed incomplete,
the use process I, II, III, or IV application shall vest to those codes in effect on the
date that all �equested supplemental or specific information is submitted. A complete
application shall be defined as set forth in FWRC 19.15.040 and based on
requirements in related handouts. Vested rights shall not be waivable pursuant to the
vested rights doctrine.
(Ord. No. 09-625, § 3, 9-15-09; Ord. No. 09-594, § 19, 1-6-09. Code 2001 § 22-
33.5.)
K:�2009 Code Ame�ments\Submittal requ'vemrnca\Staff rcport\Cwrent staffreport with exhibitslE�chibits E, F G, Ei, ( and 71Exhibit I version 2 revised 19.IS.O45.doc
EXHIBIT J
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19.15, "Permits and Review
Processes"
19. I5.030 "Review processes for improvements and additions to
developed sites"
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
Exhibit J
19.15.030 Review processes for improvements and additions to developed
sites.
Improvements and/or additions to existing developed sites shall be subject to
land use review processes as follows:
(1) Process l. Improvements and/or additions to an existing developed site that
are exempt from SEPA shall be processed using process I, provided the
improvements and/or additions do not exceed any of the following thresholds:
(a) There is no change of use.
(b) There is no reduction in the amount of required landscaping, buffering,
open space, or public areas.
(c) There is no material change or reduction in the amount of required
parking.
(d) There is no material change in the location of utilities, easements, or
pedestrian connections.
(e) There is no material change to the approved architectural design.
{fl There are no additional adverse impacts to �°^�� critical areas_ e�
�.,�f,..,.,+ +.-ee�
(2) Process ll. Improvements and/or additions to an existing developed site
that are exempt from SEPA and exceed the thresholds in subsection (1) of this
section shall be processed using process II.
(3) Improvements not exempt from SEPA. Improvements and/or additions to
an existing developed site that are not exempt from SEPA shall be processed
under process III, unless process IV is indicated by the applicable use zone chart
in which case process IV shall be used.
(Ord. No. 07-573, § 10, 12-4-07; Ord. No. 00-375, § 9, 10-3-00. Code 2001 § 22-
32.2.)
K:�2009 Code Amendments\Submiaal requiremmts�Staff rcportlCucrrnt staff repoct with ex6ibits�Exhibitt E, F G, H, 1 and nExhibit I- revised I9.15-030.doc
City Council Agenda Bill
Attachment #3: Draft Minutes of
the August 25, 2010
Planning Commission Public Hearing
Amendments to FWRC Chapter 19 relating to clarifying the complete
application and review standards of the zoning and development code
and a housekeeping amendment that maintains consistent critical areas
language.
(City File No. 10-102132-00-UP)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 25, 2010 City Hall
7:00 p.m. Council Chambers
MEETING MINUTES
Commissioners present: Merle Pfeifer, Hope Elder, Lawson Bronson, Wayne Carlson, Sarady Long, Tim O'Neil
and Tom Medhurst. Staff present: Directox of Community Development Services Greg Fewins, Planning
Manager Isaac Conlen, Principal Planner Margaret Clark, Senior Planner Deb Barker, Senior Planner Janet Shull,
Assistant City Attorney Peter Beckwith, and Administrative Assistant Darlene LeMaster. Council Member Jeanne
Burbidge was also present.
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Pfeifer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
All commissioners present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of July 21, 2010, were approved as written.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
None
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Director of Community I�evelopment Services will address the commission during the `Additional Business'
section of the agenda.
COMMISSIOl�i �USINESS
PuBLIC H�AR�rtG — Shoreline Master Progcarn Update
Chair Pfeifer expta%ned the guidelines� for the Public Hearing.
Senior Planner Janet Shull stated �hat the intent of tonight's meeting was to consider revisions to the draft
Shoreline Master Plan (S�P}.She introduced the City's consultant, Teresa Vanderburg with ESA Adolfson and
David Pader with the Departn�ent of Ecology. She also stated that there was a sign up sheet at the back that
serves two purposes. The first was to sign in if you would like to testify and secondly, to sign up if you would
like to be on an e-mail notification list.
Ms. Shull gave a brief overview of the SMP, which serves to regulate development along shorelines of the state
and establishes a comprehensive vision of how the shoreline area will be used and developed over time. She also
stated that local jurisdictions are required to prepare a local SMP to carry out the requirements of the Shoreline
Master Act (SMA). The SMP also includes goals and policies that are part of the City's comprehensive plan and
regulations that are part of the city code. The SMP includes information about existing conditions and analysis
about the potential cumulative impacts of future development and opportunities for restoration.
Ms. Shull then showed a map of the City's shorelines explaining that there were two categories — marine
shorelines and shorelines associated with lakes. There are two lakes, Steel Lake and North Lake within the City
G:�Planning Commission�2010\Meeting Summary 08-25-IO.dce
Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 July 25, 2010
and a number of additional lakes within the Potential Annexation Area (PAA). The City is required to plan for
the lakes within the PAA, however, the regulations will only apply when the area is annexed into the City.
Ms Shull then summarized the SMP process to date. She explained that work on the SMP began in early 2006.
At that time a Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) and a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) were formed to
provide input on the update. The City held a public open house in June 2006 and set up a website with
information on the SMP update. In 2007, the Planning Commission held three public meetings after which they
forwarded their recommendation to the City Council, who approved the draft SMP update in June 2007. In July
2007, the draft SMP update was submitted to the DOE for review and comments were received from DOE in
January 2009.
City staff and their consultant ESA Adolfson have been working with DC}� 'orr revisions based on DOE's
comments for the past year. Because the draft SMP update has been changed since the Ptanning Commission
and Council last saw it, staff decided to bring it back to both Planning Co�ssion and City Council.
The City mailed notice to all shoreline property owners within the C�ty and Pt�A ;about the public comment
process and the availability of draft documents. The City also mai2e� notice to former �AC and TAC members.
This City's website was also updated and links to the revised draft SMP were provEde�i. Hard copies of the
revised documents were placed in libraries and were ma�ie available at City Hall. A cppy was also made
available in the Ciry Council Conference Room and courrcii ��bers were made aware of its a.vailability.
Ms Shull then went over highlights to the revisions. She exg�ained that Section 2— Inventory and
Characterization and Section 4— Shoreline Environment had not bee� updated as DOE had no comments on
these sections. Section 2 is very bulky so it was �ot included in the PYa�snfng Commission's blue binder, but is
on the website, however the Shoreline Environme�t Designations, which is a single page map, was included.
Ms Shull explained that Section One - Introduction was re�isect ta present a better linkage between our local
SMP and the Statewide SMA. Fnur new policies wete ac�ded to Sec�ia� fihree -- Goals and Policies. Ms Shull
stated that we modified existutg pot�cies to add emp�tasis on the SMA goal of "no net loss" of ecological
function of the city's sharelines, the Purpose and F�esponsibility section was expanded and a section
summarizing Public ParG�eipa�i�n was ac�ded.
Ms Shull stated that in Section �i�e -- Sho�e�e Regulations, numerous revisions were made for clarity. For
example, city staff added � Development Standards 'F�ble; integrated critical areas regulations instead of having
them be app�tdices; adcted rec}uirement for a 50-foot setback from top of marine bluffs; and added a staff
proposed ehange to allow piers �d docks an t�e 1t�Iarine Shoreline.
In Section Six -= Restoration Plan, City staff ad'ded and updated information on regional programs that help with
shoreline restoration, added inforcrtat�on on restoration opportunities for freshwater lakes; and added two tables
that summarize and prioritize restot�tion opportunities.
In Section 7, staff added c�e�nftions that are required to make the City's SMP consistent with the SMA. Ms
Shull also stated that in Appendix A-- Cumulative Impacts Analysis, staff added a table that summarizes land
development activity in the past five years within the shoreline area and added a section that analyzes the
potential cumulative impact of allowing docks and piers on the marine shoreline.
Ms Shull mentioned that staff had scheduled a study session with the planning commission and interested
citizens for August 4, 2010, however it was changed to an informational meeting when only one Planning
Commissioner, Commissioner Carlson, attended. There were eleven citizens, the City`s Consultant and the DOE
staff in addition to staff in attendance. During the meeting, there was discussion on proposed setbacks from
marine bluff and proposed standards for bulkheads. There was also one written comment, Exhibit 2, a request
from the Kutschas to modify the stringline provisions for lakes only. Ms Shull stated that since the stringline
setback provisions had already been approved by Council, staff is not recommending any changes.
Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 July 25, 2010
Ms Shull then went over some modifications proposed by staff. These included clarifying that the 50-foot
minimum marine bluff setback is from the "top" of the marine bluff. It also included modifying Section
I5.05.050(1)(a)(i-iii) to make it clear that hard shore armoring (bulkheads/riprap) is subject to proof of
imminent damage and a shoreline conditional use permit in the Urban Conservancy Environment and that no
conditional use permit is required for soft shore armoring regardless of zone.
Ms Shull ended her presentation by stating that staff recommends approval of the proposed revisions to the draft
SMP Update with staff modifications as depicted in Exhibit 1 to the August 25, 2010 staff report.
The public hearing was opened for public testimony.
Norm Kutscha, 33021 38` Ave S, Federal Way — Submitted a document datec� August 25, 2010 and also
read from the document requesting that the Planning Commission take another look at the shoreline
setback regulations for lakes in order to make them more equitable far e�c�sting homes in relationship to
new homes.
Peter Townsend; 29508 12` Ave SW, Federal Way — He €eI� �hat it is impor�ant -to know what staff
considers the problem areas under the SMA for the past f�ve years and what shoutd be done to solve the
problems.
The public hearing was opened to questions from the commissio�te�s:
Commissioner Bronson asked what changes are being made because a�DOE requirements and what changes are
being made by the City, such as setbacks, that w� cQUld change later. Nfs. Shull replied that most of the changes
in the binder are required changes, except for piersldc�cks and setbacks. She nated that the Kutscha's request
would not be opposed by DOE. However, staff didn't feei it veas their place �o make changes to what the City
had already approved.
David Pater with Department crf Eca�ogy from the Belfevue office introduced himself and noted that he has
worked with the city to resolve issues a�d believed that they have resolved them. The state recognizes the
unique distinction of eac� �t�sdiction, and there is some flexibility. The shoreline stabilization section is the
most rigid. The state uses a checktist to r�take sure each jurESdiction has met requirements, and that there is room
for modifications to setbacks, piers and c�ec�CS. H� �fher added that there was a lot of back and forth
negotiations betw�e� �te �rty and I3G1�.
Commissic��er O'Neil wondered �hat the ci�ang�s meant for the taxpayer and how might the use of waterfront
property �e changed. Ms. Shull nated that the goal was to make as few changes as possible, and that the changes
appear reasonat��e.
Teresa Vanderburg w�ith ESA/Ado�€son noted that there is a new focus on conserving and preserving vegetation
within the setback zone and alsa to avoid impacts to resources in the water. There are also provisions for
dimensions of docks and prers. 'She clarified that the changes are only for new development and not existing
development. There is a provtsion for tear-down houses or expanding existing uses.
Commissioner Medhurst asked if variances were available. Ms. Shull replied that yes, shoreline variances are
subject to hearing examiners recommendation that is forwarded to the State, which has the ultimate approval.
Commissioner O'Neil asked whether the DOE had the final say just for variances. Ms. Shull answered that DOE
would have the final say only for variances and conditional use permits. However, these decisions are
appealable to the Shoreline Hearings Board.
Commissioner Carlson was concerned about the length of time it took for the DOE's response to proposed
changes to the City's shoreiine code. Ms. Shull noted that the state experienced staff shortages, and that once
their comments were available, the amendment was prioritized and brought to commissioners as complete as
Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 July 25, 2010
possible. Commissioner Carlson also had questions about the value of the cumulative impacts analysis as the
analysis is quantitative but the conclusions are qualitative. David Pader, with DOE responded, that the
cumulative impacts analysis is adequate
Chair Pfeifer asked if there were any more questions from the commissioners, and seeing none called for the
motion.
Commissioner Bronson moved to recommend adoption of the code amendment as prepared by staff.
Commissioner Medhurst seconded the motion.
Discussion — Commissioner Elder urged Commissioners to consider item #4 aft�e Kutscha's request regarding
setbacks. Commissioner Carlson disagreed with Commissioner Elder no�irtg that the Kutscha's request, if
approved, might penalize property owners who have not yet exercised theiF �evelopment rights. Commissioner
Carlson also acknowledged that critical areas need greater setbacks.
The motion carried, 6-1 (Elder dissenting).
The public hearing was closed.
PUBLIC HEA�uNG — Amendments Related to Submittal Requirements for Plats and Commercial Projects
Chair Pfeifer explained the guidelines for the Pu�tic Hearing.
Senior Planner Deb Barker delivered the staff report. Propased amendments to the Federal Way Revised Code
(FWRC) include:
• Short Subdivisions — Chapter 18.30, d�0 Content and form of apptication;
• Preliminary Plat — Chapter 18.35.02� Content and f��m of application;
• Permits and Review Praeess —�hapter 19.15.F�40 Development Application Submittal
Requirements;
• Permits and Reva�ru Processes -�hapter �9. ��. F145 Completeness of Applications; and
• Permits anc� Review Proeesses - Chapter 19.1 S. �I30(1) (� Review Processes for improvements and
additions to developed sites
The public hear�ng was opened fvr public testimony.
There was no public eamment.
The public testimony was �losed.
The public hearing was opened to questions from the commissioners:
Commissioner O'Neil said he agreed with the checklist concept and feels that it is much easier for the public to
use. He inquired whether this information was available on-line. Ms. Barker replied that submittal requirements
checklists are available on the City's website and staff can assist the applicant to locate the requirements and the
checklists. Commissioner O'Neil asked if the applications are tracked on-line. Ms. Barker noted that the current
permit tracking system is not set up to track these applications on
Commissioner Medhurst wanted to understand if the requirements have changed, or if some have been
eliminated. He feels that the checklist is more confusing and could be arbitrarily applied. He prefers code as
written. Ms. Barker said that the code does not give any discretion to waive submittal items that may not be
Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 July 25, 2010
necessary, while the checklist provides flexibility. Chairman Pfeifer noted that there is lots of support from
Master Builders for the checklist and bulletin concept. Commissioner Medhurst asked for clarification as to
which codes were eliminated. Chairman Pfeiffer stated that none of the codes were eliminated and the code is
still there. The checklists provide a place to go to find out what their specific application requires. Ms Barker
pointed out that the code states that the director may waive any requirements that are determined to not be
reasonably necessary. Commissioner Medhurst replied that language addressed his concerns and he is satisfied.
Commissioner Carlson is also in support of the checklist format. However, he is still concerned that submittal
requirements can be modified at the stroke of a pen. He believes that any types of changes to the submittal
process should go through the public process, especially the planning commission. He supports the amendments
only if substantive changes to application submittal requirements go through public process. Ms. Barker stated
that substantive changes to the code do come from code amendments that haYe a��ady gone through a public
process. She noted that recent changes to the clearing and grading codes co�ained very substantive changes to
performance standards, and those changes to code went through a very p� gtocess. Substantive code changes
are not administratively made, but are approved through the code am�dment process. Commissioner Carlson
stated that allayed some but not all of his concerns.
Commissioner Bronson agreed that the checklist is a wonder€Ett idea. He asked why pror��ets can't be submitted
electronically. Ms. Barker replied the City's permitting s��em is only equipped to rece�v� eleetrical permits
electronically. Commissioner Bronson asked why appIic�txans could not be submitted o� a thumb drive.
Planning Manager Conlen agreed that these types of projects da take a�ot af paper and the'City would love to
reduce paper. However, the City does not have the technology to ��iew applications on a computer screen, to
mark it up or make comments. If applications are submitted electronie��ly, the City has added copying costs that
should be borne by the applicant. Commissioner Sranson is amazed that �ity does not have enough equipment
to review the plans electronically. Planning Manager �cmlen said that it wc�ztic� be great if we did but currently
we do not have that technology.
Commissioner Long thanked staff for bringing this tapic to the Co�m�ssioners. He feels that this concept will
be a big benefit to develope�s. �e i�tquired if plans were required for Process I and II before they were
determined to be complete. A�Is. Barker canfirmed that p�ans were required and gave examples of typical process
I and II applications. CommFSSioner Lo�g inquired abou� the differences between existing code and proposed
changes to the completeness sec��on of th� code. Planning Manager Conlen stated that there is no change to
current practices. The intent is ta etarify Yhe ca�e sQ it is`clear what the practice is. There is no change from
current practice for process I and II ca�tnpleteness review, which is done at counter; and there is no change for
process III ar�d IV completeness review� �rhich take a more lengthy review process and includes a follow-up
letter.
Commissioner `�7'�Teill said that �ie understands that the proposed amendment clarifies when an applicant
becomes vested.l�s. Barker confir�ed that as the current code is vague, it is important to clarify that a complete
application is a vestect agplication.
Commissioner Long observec� �hat currently the City's Traffic Division determines if a submitted traffic study is
acceptable, and therefore if an application is complete. With the proposed language, an application would be
considered complete even if the submitted traffic study was later found to be unacceptable. Ms. Barker noted
that was an on-going topic of concern by staff since reports are not always professionally prepared.
Commissioner Long recommends that the checklists be changed to add that traffic impact analysis shall be
stamped by a professional engineer. This was clarified so that the report shall be prepared by a licensed engineer
in State of Washington.
Chairman Pfeifer thanked staff for putting the amendment together. He believes that the code amendment makes
sense and will save developers time in the long run.
Commissioner Long moved to recommend adoption of the code amendment as prepared by staff.
r.��ai9.,.,:.,� r....,...:�a:..�wnirnn,r�r��o c�.�.�w�, nx_�t_in n�.
Planning Commission Minutes Page 6
Commissioner Carlson seconded the motion.
Juiy Zs, Zoio
There was general discussion and agreement that Commissioner Long's recommended changes to the checklist
do not need to be reflected in the motion.
The motion carried, 7-0.
The public hearing was closed.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
Director of Community Development Services Greg Fewins addressed the CQ.mmission with the following
items:
Administrative Assistant Piety will be on medical leave for an undet�ined period of time. During her
absence, Tamara Fix will be the person to communicate with regardin� Plannrt�g Commission. Ms. Fix will be
assembling the Planning Commission agenda packet and correspondir�g with aYI ��anning Commissioners and
Stakeholders. Darlene LeMaster will be staffing all Planning Cotnmrssion mee����,� and drafting meeting
minutes
October 20, 2010 Planning Commission Public Hearing v�ill be on Uxban Chickens. T�iet� axe no topics for
either the Sept. 1 or the Sept. 15, 2010 Planning Comm�ss�on meeti�gs, therefore, those �rieetings will be
cancelled. Staff would like to propose a study session for the ful� Ptanning Commiss�rbn on Wednesday,
September 29, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. to talk about the urban chicken fo�sic. All Commissioners said they would be
able to attend the special study session.
2011-2012 Budget — Director Fewins explained tc� the commissioners hov�r.�cr aecess all of the 2011-2012 City
Budget docuxnents from the City's website. Director F�vvi�s also highlig�ted the proposed budget cuts to
impact the Department of Community Development Services shautc� �.ouncii approved the proposed budget.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
None
ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 9:(� p.rn. ,
r.•�viA� r„mmcaa;,,���m mnn�r;�a ���mm�rv nx-� s_ i o d�
COUNCIL M DA TE: October 5, 2010 IT #: �_
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBdECT: Amendments to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19 "Zoning & Development Code," related to
residential off-street parking.
POLICY QUESTIONS Should the city: (1) clarify an existing single family residential off-street parking provision regarding
acceptable impervious surfaces; (2) remove the large lot exemption from residential parking regulations; and (3) provide
housekeeping changes?
COMMITTEE Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC)
❑ Consent � Ordinance
❑ City Council Business
❑ Resolution
MEETING DATE: September 20, 2010
❑ Public Hearing
❑ Other
5TAF RE PORT BY: M att hew Herrera, Associate P lanner _ DE PT_C ommu nity Development Services _
Item Note — Staff presented this item to the LUTC on August 2, 2010, with no public comments received. The committee
recommended approval and forwarded the ordinance to full council for first reading. During the September 7, 2010, City
Council meeting, two citizens provided comments concerning the proposed ordinance, whereby the council referred the
item back to the LUTC far further deliberation. .
Exhibits: (1) Approved minutes ofthe July 21, 2010, Planning Commission meeting; (2) Planning Commission stafFreport
with Exhibits A-C; and (3) Draft adoption ordinance.
Background: (1) The city's existing residential off-street parking regulations allow parking within a garage, carport or
"approved impervious surface." FWRC does not define approved impervious surface and has resulted in conflicting
interpretations between staff, Municipal Court and Hearing Examiner. The proposed amendment would replace the term
"approved impervious surface" with "driveway or parking pad." Surfaces permitted outright for parking pads would be asphalt
or concrete. Applicants may apply for a no-fee modification of those outright standards that may include, but are not limited to:
gravel, pavers or Low Impact Development (LID) methods such as pervious concrete and pervious asphalt.
(2) The existing residential off-street parking ordinance exempts all residential lots in excess of 20,000 square feet (0.45 acres)
from compliance with single-family residential off-street parking regulations. Staff could not find justification for the
exemption nor any instances of a similar exemption in surrounding jurisdictions. The proposed amendment would apply
equitably to all residential uses. ,
(3)Proposed housekeeping amendments would combine all residential parking standards into one article and replace code
redundancies with cross references.
Options Considered: 1) Adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation as contained in the draft adoption ordinance; 2)
adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation as modified by the LUTC; 3) do not adopt the proposed policy; or (4) refer
the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further proceedings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Option # 1, adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ��� ��)a�id DIRECTOR APPROVAL: C7 r �
Committee Council Committee Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: " 1 move to forward Option #2 to First Reading October S. 2010 as amended
to include asphalt, cement, gravel, pavers, LID with a proval, and grass, provided it is not in the front yard. "
� _ �� .� _ � .,�'-
Committee Chair
Member
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION(S): 1 R�ADING OF ORDINANCE (10/5/2010): I move to
reading for enactment on the October 19, 2010, consent agenda.
Committee Member
the ordinance to a second
Continued on page
2 READING OF ORDINANCE (10/19/2010) "I move approval of the LIITC's recommendation to approve the code amendments
contained in the adoption ordinance. " �
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION: �
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1sT reading � b'_ ` r �
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED — 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION #
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 21, 2010 City Hall
7:00 .m. Council Chambers
MEETING MINUTES
Commissioners present: Merle Pfeifer, Hope Elder, Lawson Bronson, Wayne Carlson, Sarady Long, Tim O'Neil
and Tom Medhurst. Staff present: Planning Manager Isaac Conlen, Associate Planner Matt Herrera, Senior
Engineering Plans Reviewer Ann Dower, Assistant City Attorney Peter Beckwith, and Administrative Assistant
Darlene LeMaster.
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Pfeifer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
All commissioners present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of July 7, 2010, have been delayed and will be presented at the August 4, 2010 Planning
Commission Meeting for approval..
AUDIENCE COMMENT
None
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Planning Manager Conlen recalled the July 7, 2010 meeting where City Manager/Police Chief Wilson offered
to provide a budget update for all Planning Commissioners. City Manager/Police Chief Wilson has chosen two
dates and will be inviting all committee members and commissioners to attend. These budget briefings will be
delivered in a town hall format at will be held on Tuesday, August 31, 2010 and Monday, September 30, 2010
in City Hall Council Chambers at 6:30 PM.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING — Proposed Text Amendments to Federal Way Revised Code Related to Vehicle
Storage Requirements in Residential Areas
Chair Pfeifer explained the guidelines for the Public Hearing.
Associate Planner Matt Herrera delivered the staff report. Proposed amendments to the Federal Way Revised
Code (FWRC) include:
Addition of "nonmotorized vehicles" to Section 19.05.140 (N definitions)
Changes to text of Article VII (Commercial Vehicles, Recreational Vehicles, and Boats) of
Chapter 19.130, Off-Street Parking
G:�Planning Commission�20101Meeting Summary 07-21-10.doc �1�� � � ��
PAGE_L_._0��--
Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 July 21, 2010
• Addition of Section 19.130.2XXX (Purpose and Intent) to Chapter 19.130, Off-Street Parking
• Addition of Section 19.130.2XXX (Parking and storage of motor vehicles and nonmotorized
vehicles) to Chapter 19.130, Off-Street Parking
• Deletion of Article V(Outdoor Activities and Storage) and Section 19.130.230 (Residential
Uses)
The proposed zoning and development code amendment replaces the phrase, "approved impervious surface,"
with a more clear definition of allowable impervious surfaces, removes the exemption for lots greater than
20,000 square feet, provides a purpose and intent for residential parking and storage standards; and
consolidates code sections and removes redundant language.
The public hearing was opened for public testimony.
Clara McArthur; 31026 20`" Ave S— Ms. McArthur spoke against the proposed text amendments,
stating that she felt these code changes are very untimely. Ms. McArthur is concerned that she and
others that have been affected by the poor economy will be unable to comply with proposed code
amendments.
Buck Pedigru; 31033 20� Ave S— Mr. Pedigru asked if the requirement to pa�e a driveway was a
local, county or state law. Mr. Pedigru also asked what would happen if a resident could not afford to
pay to pave their driveway... would they be penalized. Chair Pfeifer stated that the proposed
amendment is a City Code revision. It has not been mandated by the County or the State. The intent
of the ordinance is educating residents on where parking is allowable. Lastly, Mr. Pedigru asked why
Federal Way residents' property taac is substantially higher than that of Bellevue residents. Mr. Pfeifer
deferred that question to another time as it was unrelated to the topic at hand.
Rhonda Pedigru; 31033 20`" Ave S— Ms. Pedigru stated that her existing driveway is compact gravel
and wants to know if the proposed amendment means that her driveway will have to be paved. If a
resident has a trailer in the back yard, will a parking pad be required? Chair Pfeifer responded that if a
recreational vehicle is parked in the back yard and is not in view from the front, it will not require a
parking pad.
The public hearing was opened to questions from the commissioners:
Commissioner Carlson said he was empathetic to what he heard during the public testimony. Commissioner
Carlson stated his interpretation of the ordinance is that as far as an existing gravel driveway is concerned, if it
met at least one of the criteria (which it should), it would be allowed and grandfathered in. In comparison, if a
resident had been parking on the gass, they could install a gravel driveway with approval from the Community
Development Services (CDS) Director.
Mr. Herrera confirmed Commissioner Carlson's interpretation. In addition, for residents of existing homes
where a grass, gravel or dirt driveway was allowed at the time the home was permitted, these property owners
would be protected by "non-conforming development" standards and this new ordinance would not affect
them. This ordinance is for new development or for property owners who did not have prior approval to park
on their grass. If a neighbor were to complain, a code compliance officer would visit the site and enforce that.
The City's Code Compliance division is complaint driven. The only way a code compliance o�cer would
come to your home is if a complaint was received. Allowable parking surfaces are asphalt, cement, a carport or
a garage. There is a design standard for gravel. Gravel is also allowed with a modification (written approval
from the CDS Director).
G:�Planning Commission�20]OVvieeting Summary 07-21-10.doc
EXH�!�1�'
PAG E �._0 �.._
Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 July 21, 2010
From the audience, Ms. McArthur asked about a hard-pan dirt surface. Mr. Herrera answered that hard-pan
dirt is no an allowable surface, however, if the lot had originally been approved with hard-pan dirt as the
approved driveway surface, then staff would grandfather that property in through a written administrative
decision. Because a material isn't listed as allowable does not mean it won't be allowed. It means that staff
would like to review the proposal and then decide whether or not to allow it.
Commissioner Elder spoke against the proposed ordinance and in support resident testimony. Commissioner
Elder is bothered that our Code Compliance system is complaint driven. Why would we ask people to invest
money in making require improvements dwing our current poor economy? The residential audience applauded
Commissioner Elder for her statement.
Commissioner Bronson recalled the Planning Commission talking of considering semi-pervious streets. Mr.
Herrera clarified that semi-pervious surfaces on private and commercial property is on the Long Range Work
Program. Due to staffing, this item will not be brought forward any time soon. At this time, there is no policy
that allows pervious street surfaces.
Commissioner Bronson expressed concern over a resident having to go back and search through King Co.
permit records to verify what had been permitted. King Co. didn't require permits for many things prior to
Federal Way incorporating. If a resident needed to prove a permit did exist in order to make a modification,
how would they if the permit had not existed in the first place? Mr. Herrera reiterated what is meant by "non-
conforming development" and that any existing property that originated prior to city incorporation was fall
under the non-conforming development clause.
Commissioner Medhurst commented on the Hylebos Creek Park use of pervious surface in the parking lot.
Commissioner Mehurst suggesting using feedback on the success of this surface in the parking lot as back up
information to this ordinance.
Commissioner Medhurst asked for clarification for an existing vehicle, recreational vehicle, etc. parked either
in the backyard or side yard. If it is not visible from the street, what would be the requirement for a parking
pad? Mr. Herrera explained that a vehicle on a driveway in the backyard would not be required to sit on a pad;
however, it can not be parked in the grass. Commissioner Medhurst asked how a vehicle parked in the
backyard that is not visible to the public could be considered "neighborhood blight" or reduces one's property
value. Mr. Herrera responded that the way the ordinance is written, if a citizen called code compliance to
complain that a neighbor was parking a vehicle on the grass in the backyard, code compliance, under this
ordinance, is required to come out and site that resident.
Commissioner Medhurst stated that in his interpretation of the ordinance, there is still quite a bit of ambiguity
that needs clarifying. Commissioner Medhurst concurs with Commissioner Elder in her dissatisfaction of
Federal Way's code compliance being complaint driven and not from being out of compliance. Mr. Herrerra
stated that this parking issue at hand is likely the number one complaint that code enforcement handles. The
ordinance came about in order to clarify the existing phrase "approved impervious surface." It would simplify
enforcing this code to have approved impervious surface more clearly defined. Commissioner Medhurst asked
that for lots greater than 20,000 s.f., would a certain amount of impervious surface trigger stormwater
mitigation? The 2009 SWDM states the trigger is 2,000 s.f.
Commissioner O'Neil questioned staff about his neighbor who pazks his motor home on grass behind his
fence. Mr. Herrera noted that under the current code, the neighbor would be in violation (if reported), because
you may not park on grass. The proposed ordinance clarifies what is meant by "approved impervious surface."
Commissioner O'Neil asked if the impervious surface have to be permanent. Could it be wood? Does it need
G:�Planning Commission�20101Meeting Summary 07-21-10.doc
EXI� � � �'�`
PAGE,...� ._G��...-
Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 July 21, 2010
to be permitted? Mr. Herrera stated a concrete or asphalt parking pad does not have to be permitted. Anything
outside of what is defined as approved could be requested in writing for approval by the CDS Director. There
is no charge for an administrative decision.
Commissioner Long feels the City is sending mixed messages. In 2009, the Surface Water Division presented
Low Impact Development. The purpose was to reduce impervious surfaces. Now staff is saying that more
impervious surface needs to be added as parking surfaces. Another point of the LID ordinance was that it was
illegal to wash your vehicle on your driveway as soapy and dirty water flows into the catch basins. Educational
materials were distributed encouraging residents to wash their cars on their lawn. Staff is now saying it is
illegal to park on your lawn, the same lawn that you should park on to wash your car. Mr. Herrera clarified
that staff wants and encourages residents to wash their car on the lawn. The intent of the ordinance is that cars
should not be parked on the lawn for any length of time. The car washing ordinance was a result of the City
adopting a Federal standard as part of the NPDES permit. The code is in effect as part of the permit. As it
stands today, parking on grass is in violation of the code. The intent of the proposed ordinance is to clarify
what is meant by "approved impervious surface." This ordinance applies to new development.
Commissioner Carlson clarified that LID and pervious pa�ement may not always be the preferred application
for all sites.
Commissioner Medhurst understands the intent of the ordinance and supports the ordinance that wants to
prevent visual blight. However, Commissioner Medhurst is strictly against putting boundaries on what can be
parked on the side or rear of a home, especially if it is not in public view. Mr. Conlen also wanted to clarify
that this ordinance doesn't apply to City right of way. This ordinance and the changes to this ordinance don't
apply to the surface of driveways. The point to this ordinance applies to the parking surface that is not on the
driveway. Mr. Conlen also asked the commissioners to consider the other side ofthe argument when it comes
to blight. Unfortunately, there was no public comment heard from citizens that aze in favor of this ordinance,
but based on the number of complaints that are received, the concern over neighborhood blight is very strong.
Commissioner Elder voiced her frustration with this ordinance and that she feels there is not consistency in the
City Code.
Commissioner O'Neil asked about non-motorized vehicles. Mr. Herrera confumed that non-motorized
vehicles include campers, trailers, etc. Mr. Herrera again stated that this modification to the proposed
ordinance is not a policy change. All of the scenarios brought forth into discussion would be treated today, not
differently than they have been treated up until now. Staff is merely asking to clarify what is meant by
"approved impervious surface". And if a citizen wanted to use something other that what is listed as approved,
a written request needs to be made and approved by the CDS Director in the form of an administrative decision
at no cost to the citizen. Staff was not prepared to discuss a policy change. Should the commission request
staffto do that, it would need to be requested to add to the work plan. Commissioner O'Neil also inquired if
non-conforming development is transferred with tile when a property is sold.
Assistant Atty. Beckwith noted that what is being proposed actually broadens what can be exceptions to the
rule with approval from the CDS Directar. The discussion of non-conforming development applying to future
property owners when a property is sold is a separate and legal topic that is not a part of the issue at hand.
Commissioner Bronson asked if staff has researched AST'M standards that defines impervious surface. Mr.
Herrera stated that the City has adopted the ASTM standards in its Development Standards Manual. What is
missing is the definition of what is approved impervious surface. Commissioner Bronson was unhappy that
what is defined by ASTM as impervious is not automatically also approved. He feels that staffshould follow
the national standard, period, and that staff needs to revisit this issue in its entirety. Lastly, if there are so many
G:�Planning Commission�2010VvIeeting Summary 07-21-10.doc
EXI-� � � ��'
PAGE_�...�� �
Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 July 21, 2010
people against others parking on lawns, why aren't they present and making comment.
Mr. Herrera noted that asphalt and cement were defined as approved based on what other neighboring local
jurisdictions have in their codes. Chair Pfeifer summarized the intention of the revision to the ordinance as
presented.
More examples and scenarios were brought into the conversation by commissioners with the same reiteration
of the ordinance as it has existed since it came into being over eleven years ago. The proposed changes to the
ordinance clarify what is meant by "approved impervious surface." The process and policy sunounding code
compliance procedures have not changed. Assistant City Atty. Beckwith stated that if a permit wasn't required
at the time (e.g. parking on a gravel or dirt driveway) and it was okay then, then it is okay now.
Commissioner Medhurst supports taking out the ambiguity in the ordinance but feels other issues ha�e been
raised and should be revisited in its entirety. There are a number of open issues the public has a legitimate
concern with (i.e. side yards, driveways, backyards, etc.)
Commissioner Carlson concurred with Commissioner Medhurst. He would like to reconsider what is defined
as visual blight. Mr. Herrera said that if directed, staff could put this on their work plan.
Chair Pfeifer invited additional public comment.
Clara McArthur; 31026 20` Ave S— Ms. McArthur is still unclear on what it means to be grandfathered in.
Chair Pfeifer explained non-conforming development standards as it applies to this ordinance. Ms. McArthur
thanked the Commission and staff and feels that the requirements are reasonable for new development, not for
established property owners.
Mary Francis Painter; 3102120`�' Ave S— Ms. Painter wanted to request that the issue of grandfathering in is
not left to the discretion of the code enforcement officer. Ms. Painter also suggested a public stakeholder
group that discusses visual blight.
Rhonda Pedigru; 31033 20` Ave S— Ms. Pedigru asked about an easement on the side of one's property. Asst.
City Atty. suggested that this issue is a separate issue. Commissioner Medhurst explained that he believes Ms.
Pedigur to be speaking of a setback, not an easement.
Norma Blanchard; 31039 7' Ave SW— Ms. Blanchard stated she feels that the City's code compliance officers
are ineffective and gave examples to back up her opinion.
Commissioner Long inquired about a penalty for those not in compliance with this ordinance. How much time
is given far a resident to get into compliance. Mr. Herrera stated he is not familiar with the fines or their
amounts. The intent of code compliance is not to fine or penalize residents; rather, it is to educate residents
and give them an opportunity to become compliant before any further action may be necessary. Commissioner
Long expressed he is in favor of clarifying the existing ordinance as it applies to approved impervious surface.
The public testimony was closed.
G:�Planning Comrttission�2010Vvieeting Summary 07-21-10.doc
EXI�'! � �' �3
PAG E..�w....'� � -�-
Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 July 21, 2010
Commissioner Carlson moved to approve the ordinance as presented by staff with one amendment:
Exhibit A, Page 1, Seciton 19.130.2xx, (1)
All motor vehicle and nonmotorized vehicle parking and storage for residential uses containing either
detached or attached dwellings shall be in a garage, carport, driveway, or a parking pad except for
recreational vehicles to be used as a temporary dwelling as specified in FWRC 19.130.290(1). A parkingpad
shall accommodate the size of the vehicles and be composed of asphalt or cement. The director may grant a
modification of parking pad surface materials to include gravel, pavers, LID methods �pervious asphalt,
pervious concrete, etc. ). or other suitable materials pursuant to criteria set forth in FWRC 19.130.100.
Commissioner Medhurst seconded the motion.
There was brief discussion by Commissioner Bronson, advocating the need to accept the ASTM standards. As
such, Commissioner Bronson will not vote to approve this proposed ordinance.
The motion carried, 4-3. Commissioners Long, Elder and Bronson dissenting.
The public hearing was closed.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
None
AUDIENCE COMMENT
None
ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 835 p.m.
G:�Planning Commission\20101Meeting Summary 07-21-10.doc `
EX��'���
PAGE_��r-�-�-
`
CITY OF � �
Federal Way
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DaTE: July 14, 2010
TO: Chair Merle Pfeifer and Members of the City of Federal Way Planning Commission
FROM Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner
Greg Fewins, Director of Community Development Services
SUS.TECT: Zoning and Development Code amendments related to residential off-street vehicle
parking requirements.
F�LE: 10-102049-00-UP
MEETING DATE: July 21, 2010
A. POLICY QUESTIONS
(1) Should the City replace "approved impervious surface" with prescriptive requirements for
residential vehicle parking and storage surface material; (2) remove the exemption for all lots greater
than 20,000 square-foot to comply with the residential motor vehicle parking and storage regulations;
(3) provide a purpose and intent statement for residential parking and storage standards; and (4) make
housekeeping amendments to consolidate code sections and remove redundant language from the
existing residential vehicle storage standards.
B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends amending Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapters 19.05 and 19.130
reflecting affirmative responses to the policy questions above and as shown in strikeoubunderline
format in Exhibit A.
C. ATTACHMENTS
E�ibit A— Proposed code amendment to Federal N'ay Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19, "Zoning and
Development Code," Chapters 19.05 and 19.130
E�ibit B— Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) issued June 30, 2010
E�ibit C— Community Development Services Stakeholder Group
D. BACKGROUND a� ANALYSIS
The substantive portion of the proposed code amendments were requested by the department's code
enforcement staff to provide clarification of suitable surface materials for vehicle storage in
EX1����� 2-
PAG E _1._._..� ��Z�.--
residential areas. Additionally, code enforcement staff has requested the commission to consider the
removal of an exemption from the City's motor vehicle and non-motorized vehicle storage
regulations provided to single-family lots greater than 20,000 square feet (approximately 0.45 acres).
While drafting the proposed code language, planning staff recognized the benefit of providing a
purpose and intent statement; consolidating the code section with a similar residential code section
related to residential commercial and recreational vehicle storage; and several housekeeping
amendments that will provide a cross reference to applicable standards and the removal of redundant
language.
Surface Materials
As shown in the strikeout version of the existing code (page 1 of Exhibit A), there are currently three
acceptable methods to store vehicles on residential properties; garage, carport, or on an approved
impervious surface. Garage and carport are clear methods for vehicle storage, but FWRC does not
provide reference to what constitutes an "approved impervious surface." Staff recommends replacing
"approved impervious surface" with "[...] driveway, or a parking pad." Further explanation of the
parking pad would include: "[a] parking pad shall accommodate the size of the vehicle and be
composed of asphalt or concrete." Citizens would also be given the option to request a modification
of those standards if the alternative material(s) would not leave the property, is usable year-round, and
will not deteriorate air or water quality as shown in the cross-reference on the underline version of the
proposed amendment and existing FWRC 19.130.100 provided for reference (pages 2 and 4 of
Eachibit A, respectively). The result of the amendment will provide a clear and consistent requirement
for citizens, applicants, and staff.
Code Enforcement staff receive complaints from City residents regarding the unappealing aesthetic
impacts of neighboring residents that park vehicles on vegetated and unpaved surfaces. Additionally,
parking areas composed on unpaved surfaces can contribute to erosion and water quality deterioration
during times of heavy rainfall. Staff is able to enforce the current code for complaints of vehicles
parked on vegetated surfaces as the existing code language refers to garages, carports, and approved
impervious surface that are appropriate for vehicle storage. It is the instances of vehicles parked on
gravel and hard packed dirt surfaces that staff has had difficulty administering a cleax and defensible
enforcement of the code provision.
As mentioned previously, the Zoning and Development Code does not provide guidance of what an
approved impervious surface represents. Over several years this has resulted in inconsistent
determinations made by staff from several departmental divisions. Residential complaint calls to the
City regarding vehicles parked on gravel or dirt have been difficult to resolve as there is currently no
clarifying language as to whether the surfaces are considered an "approved impervious surface." A
recent Federal Way Municipal Court ruling dismissed a Notice of Violation order as it determined a
graveled area qualifies as a pad, but the city's Hearing Examiner disagreed and suggested that a
parking pad is an impervious surface such as concrete. The intent of this proposed amendment is to
provide the public and staff an unambiguous description of an appropriate residential off-street
parking surface.
Lot Size Exemption
Current off-street parking regulations related to residential uses exempt all lots greater than 20,000
square feet, or approximately 0.45 acres, from compliance with vehicle starage requirements (Exhibit
A, page 1). Code enforcement staff responding to perceived violations, such as vehicles, boats, and
RVs parked on lawns, are unable to act on the complaint due to the exemption. Staff did not find lot
Residential Off-Street Parking File #10-102049-UP
Planning Commission Staff Report f 5 z
EXI����
PAGE=C� �. �---
size exemptions for vehicle storage at the five jurisdictions referenced below. Further, staff could not
find justification for including the exemption in historical records related to the original code
adoption in 1999. As citizen complaints concerning the vehicle storage regardless of the lot size
continue to be made and there does not seem to be a defensible justification for the distinction, staff
recommends an equitable enforcement of the regulation by removing the 20,000 square-foot lot
exemption.
Jurisdictional Comparisons
Staffhas reviewed residential off-street parking code language in the following five jurisdictions:
City Surface Material Requirement Large Lot Size
Ezem tion
ACC 18.52.060 - off street parking spaces for SF dwelling shall be All weather
Auburn Paved with asphalt concrete or cement concrete. surface may be
used for lots >4
acres
KCC 15.05.090 — paved w/ asphalt or equivalent material unless
Kent waived by the planning director, but the first 20 feet of the driveway No
must be aved.
Des DMMC 18.44.100 - asphalt or concrete for driveways and parking No
Moines ads.
Renton RCC 4-4-080(G) - asphaltic concrete, cement or equivalent material No
of a ermanent nature as a roved b the Public Works De artment.
Tacoma TCC 13.06.510 - asphalt concrete or cement. Alternatives with No
a roval from Ci En ineer.
Purpose Statement
Planning staff recommends the addition of a purpose and intent statement to the new Article VI
"Residential Parking and Vehicle Storage" code section that provides a background and justification
for the regulations. The statement provides a layperson summary of the intent of the regulations and
clear basis for enforcement when needed.
Housekeeping Amendments
While researching and drafting a proposal to the Planning Commission, sta.ff has proposed the
following non-substantive code amendments:
Consolidation — The relocation of the existing residential off-street parking regulations titled
"Residential Uses" to a new article titled "Residential Parking and Vehicle Storage." The proposed
article would consolidate parking regulations for typical motorized and nonmotorized vehicles,
commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles, and boats. (Exhibit A, page 2)
Definition — The relocation of the nonmotorized vehicles definition from within the text of the
standards to the Zoning and Development Code definition section in Chapter 19.05 FWRC. (EaLhibit
A, page 1)
Redundancies — Planning staff recommends removing language regarding the emergency use of RVs
as temporary dwellings and replacing it with a cross reference to the applicable code section. Staff
Residential Off-Street Parking
Planning Commission StaffReport
File # 10-102049-UP
Page 3 of 5
E��"�����
PAGE � ��_! --..-
also recommends removing redundant language regarding junk and inoperable vehicles. (E�ibit A,
page 2)
E. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) (Exhibit B) was issued for the proposed code
amendments on June 30, 2010, pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act Rules 197-11-340. Notice
of the environmental determination was provided in the Federal Way Mirror, City designated bulletin
boards and emailed to the department's stakeholder group (Exhibit G�. The comment period ended on
July 14, 2010, with no comments submitted to the City.
Public notice of the Planning Commission hearing was emailed to the department's stakeholders June
30, 2010, published in the Federal Way Mirror July 3, 2010, and posted on the City designated
bulletin boards July 7, 2010. This staff report was emailed to the department's stakeholders on July
14, 2010.
I+'. BASIS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
FWRC Title 19, "Zoning and Development," Chapter 19.80, "Process VI Review," establishes a
process and criteria for development regulation amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the
role of the Planning Commission is as follows:
1. To review and evaluate the proposed development regulation amendments.
2. To determine whether the proposed development regulation amendment meets the
criteria provided by FWRC 19.80.130 (Item G below).
3. To forward a recommendation to City Council regarding adoption of the proposed
development regulation amendment.
G. DECISIONAL CRITERIA
FWRC 19.80.130 provides criteria for development regulation amendments. The following section
analyzes the compliance of the proposed amendments with the criteria provided by FWRC 19.80.130.
The city may amend the te�rt of the FWRC only if it finds that:
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan.
Staff Response — The proposed code amendment is consistent with the followfng goals and
policies:
L UGI
L UG3
L UP14
HP4
Improve the appearance and function of the built environment.
Preserve and protect Federal Way's single family neighborhoods.
Maintain and protect the character of existing and future single family
neighborhoods through strict enforcement of the City's land use regulations.
Maintain a strong code enforcement program to protect residential areas from
illegal dand use activities.
Residential Off-Street Parking
Planning Commission StaffReport
File #10-102049-UP
Page 4 of 5 �
EX��'��'�
pdGE `�.,G� �_.?�--
2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare.
Staff Response — The proposed code amendment bears a substantial relationship to welfare
as it will remove ambiguity regarding what is and what is not considered appropriate vehicle
storage.
3. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the City.
Staff Response — The proposed code amendment is in the best interest of the city as it
provides clarity to an existing code provision, aesthetic value to residential areas, and equity
among all single family property owners.
H. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Consistent with the provisions of FWRC 19.80240, the Planning Commission may take the following
actions regarding the proposed development regulation amendments:
1. Recommend to City Council adoption of the FWRC text amendments as proposed;
3
4
2. Modify the proposed FWRC text amendments and recommend to City Council adoption of
the FWRC te� amendments as modified;
Recommend to City Council that the proposed FWRC text amendments not be adopted; or
Forward the proposed FWRC text amendments to City Council without a recommendation.
Residential Off-Street Pazking
Planning Commission StaffReport
File #10-102049-UP
Page 5 of 5
EXt�'�s-� 2
PAGE 5_._-��=
19.05.140 N definitions.
"Native vegetation" includes native, undisturbed areas or rehabilitation of previously
disturbed areas that consist of trees, plants, forest litter, and understory indigenous to the Pacific
Northwest or near natives that are suitable for the Pacific Northwest climate. Invasive species,
such as Himalayan Blackberry or Scotch Broom, are not native species.
"Natural features " means physical characteristics of the subject property that are not
manmade.
"Natural materials" means materials chemically unaltered from their natural state.
"Natural surveillance " means easy observation of buildings, spaces, and activities by
people passing, living, working, or recreating nearby.
"Nonconformance " means any use, structure, lot, condition, activity or any other feature
or element of private or public property or the use or utilization of private or public property that
does not conform to any of the provisions of this title or that was not approved by the city of
Federal Way through the appropriate decision-making process required under this title.
"Nonliving groundcover" means gavel, chipped bark or similar nonpolluting material
through which water can freely percolate to the soil beneath.
"Nonmotorized vehicles " include but are not limited to travel and camp trailers. utilitv
trailers truck cam�ers and boat or vehicle transport trailers.
"Normal maintenance " includes interior and exterior repairs and incidental alterations.
"Normal maintenance and repair" includes, but is not limited to, painting, roof repair
and replacement, plumbing, wiring and electrical systems, mechanical equipment replacement
and weatherization. "Incidental alterations " includes, but is not limited to, construction of
nonbearing walls or partitions.
"Notice of determination " for sign regulations means the determination that the city
issues as to whether a sign conforms to this title and other sections of this Code.
"Nuisance vegetation " shall mean any tree or vegetation that, in the opinion of the city or
an expert approved by the city (such as, but not limited to, a professional forester, certified
arborist, or landscape architect), is an invasive variety, is an allergen, or due to its location is
causing or is likely to cause damage to a permanent structure, or other economic or environmental
harm or harm to human, animal, or plant health that cannot be mitigated without removal of the
tree or vegetation.
"Nursing home " means the same as "convalescent center."
(Ord. No. 09-610, § 3(EaLh. A), 4-7-09; Ord. No. 09-593, § 24, 1-6-09. Code 2001 § 22-1.14.)
. - __
� � � �-
. -
1 � �"�' 2
�. ���
. ,
EXH1�1T
PAGE_ �___OF. 3
. ��� - - - - - - '
. �� _. , �• . �� - � �' • '
,� ,�. . .. , , .• .• •. , � ��
�
Article VI�. �' ' " t � ' D `� ' " '''�'°" "`' B "°`" Residential Parking and
,
Vehicle Stora�e
19.130.2XX Purpose and intent
The pur� of this article is to establish standards for �arking and stora�e of vehicles for
residential zones and uses These standards are intended to protect propertv values bv reducin�
visual bl�,ht caused bv vehicle storage located on lawns and other vegetated areas and to nrovide
reasonable size limitations for storage of commercial and recreational vehicles,
19 130 2XX Parking and stora e of motor vehicles and nonmotorized vehicles
(1) All motor vehicle and nonmotorized vehicle �arking and stora,ge for residential uses
containin�either detached or attached dwelli�s shall be in a garage carport drivewav or
parking�ad com�osed of as�halt cement pavers or �xavel except for recreational vehicles to be
used as a te�orary dwelling.as specified in FWRC 19.130.290(1)
�2) An�garage car�ort or parking pad shall have direct drivewav access.
�3) All vehicles considered�unked wrecked dismantled or inoperable must be stored in
a completelv enclosed buildin�.
19.130.250 Parking and storage of commercial vehicles in residential zones limited.
Parking or storage of commercial vehicles is prohibited on residentially zoned lots except
as follows:
(1) A maximum of one commercial vehicle based on standard pickup, light duty trucks,
or passenger vehicles, that does not exceed a maximum of 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight
rating (GVWR as defined in RCW 46.25.010) may be parked on any residentially zoned lot;
(2) A maximum of one commercial vehicle regardless of GVWR may be parked or stored
on any lot in a single-family residential zone (RS 35.0) or a suburban estates zone (SE);
(3) Commercial vehicles may be parked on any lot in a residential zone for a maximum
of 48 hours for the exclusive purpose of loading or unloading the vehicle;
(4) Commercial vehicles may be parked on any lot in a residential zone for construction
purposes pursuant to a valid development permit;
(5) A maximum of one commercial vehicle not more than nine feet in height and 22 feet
in length may be parked on any lot if used for private construction purposes and when it is not
visible from a right-of-way or access easement and not parked in the driveway;
(6) Parking or storage as allowed by FWRC 19.130.270.
Except for commercial vehicles used for loading and unloading purposes and commercial
vehicles for construction purposes with a valid development permit, no more than one
commercial vehicle is allowed per lot.
(Ord. No. 09-607, § 3(E�. A-1), 4-7-09; Ord. No. 09-595, § 12, 1-6-09; Ord. No. 04-457, § 3, 2-
3-04. Code 2001 § 22-1176.) EX��� i� �
PAGE..,.���..1_._
Exr���� �
PAGE�._OF.�..._._
19.130.260 Parking and storage of recreational vehicles and boats in residential zones limited.
Parking or storage of any recreational vehicle or boat more than nine feet in height and
more than 22 feet in length is prohibited in residentially zoned lots except as allowed by FWRC
19.130270 or 19.130.290(1).
(Ord. No. 09-607, § 3(E�. A-1), 4-7-09; Ord. No. 09-595, § 13, 1-6-09; Ord. No. 04-457, § 3, 2-
3-04. Code 2001 § 22-1177.)
19.130.270 Exceptions.
The city may, using process III, approve a request to park or store a vehicle or boat of any
size on a lot in a residential zone if:
(1) The parking or storage of the vehicle or boat will not be detrimental to the character
of the neighborhood;
(2) The property abutting the subject property will not be impacted by the parking or
storage;
(3) The placement of the vehicle or boat will not create a potential fire hazard; and
(4) The parking or storage is clearly accessory to a residential use on the subject property
and the vehicle or boat is operated by a resident of the subject property.
(Ord. No. 09-607, § 3(E�. A-1), 4-7-09; Ord. No. 04-457, § 3, 2-3-04; Ord. No. 00-375, § 25,
2000; Ord. No. 90-43, § 2(115.145(2)), 2-27-90. Formerly 22-1177. Code 2001 § 22-1178.)
19.130.280 Additional requirements.
The city may impose screening requirements, limit the hours of operation and impose
other restrictions to eliminate adverse impacts of the parking or storage.
(Ord. No. 09-607, § 3(Each. A-1), 4-7-09; Ord. No. 04-457, § 3, 2-3-04; Ord. No. 90-43,
§ 2(115.145(2)), 2-27-90. Formerly 22-1178. Code 2001 § 22-1179.)
19.130.290 Limitation on use.
It is a violation of this chapter to sleep in, or use for any other residential purpose, a
vehicle, recreational vehicle, or boat parked in a residential zone for more than 14 days in any
180-day period, except as allowed by subsection (1) of this section.
(1) Based on a written request, the director may permit a recreational vehicle of any size
to be used as a temporary dwelling on a single-family residential lot where the primary dwelling
unit is unsafe to occupy by reason of disaster or accident such as fire, wind, earthquake, or other
similar circumstance, provided:
(a) The recreational vehicle may be occupied for a maacimum of 12 months from
the date the primary dwelling was damaged. One 12-month extension may be granted by
the director based on demonstration of continuing hardship and documented good faith
efforts to complete construction.
(b) Occupancy of the recreational vehicle shall cease within 30 days of issuance
of a certificate of occupancy for reconstruction of the primary dwelling unit at the
property.
(c) The recreational vehicle may be located within the required front yard setback
but may not obstruct sight distance at driveways and intersections. The recreational
vehicle may not be in required side or rear yards setbacks.
(d) Generators shall not be utilized.
(e) The director's approval is revocable if the requirements of this section are not
met.
(2) The director shall provide a copy of the approval letter to the applicant, pro {
owner (if different from the applicant), and all adjoining property owners. ���� � i� Z
(Ord. No. 09-607, § 3(E�ch. A-1), 4-7-09; Ord. No. 04-457, § 3, 2-3-04; Ord. No. 90-4 E .�V ��
§ 2(115.145(3)), 2-27-90. Formerly 22-1179. Code 2001 § 22-1180.)
�� �
EXi� . ��`
PAGE � �� 3 --
�
CITY OP �
Federai Way
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGPTIFICANCE (DNS)
Proposed Text Amendments to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC)
Related to Vehicle Storage Requirements in Residential Ar�as
(Non-Project Action}
File No:10-102049-00-UP
Description: Proposed text amendments ta the City's zoning and development code include the addition of
prescriptive requirements of asphalt or pavement for residential vehicle storage surface material;
the removal of exemption for all lots greater than 20,000 square foot to comply with the
residential vehicle storage regulations; and housekeeping amendments to remove redundant
(anguage from the existing residential vehicle storage code section.
Location: Non-project action — Citywide
Applicant: City of Federai Way
Lead Agency: City of Federal Way
Staff Contact: Associate Planner Matthew Herrera, 253-835-2638
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on
the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.03U(2)(c). This
decision was made after review of a completed enviranmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and
other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority
under the State Environmental Policy Act pursuant to RCW 43.31 C.11 �. 'This information is available to the
public on request.
Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request from the Department of
Community Development Services. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act
on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on Jaly 14, 2010.
Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final fotlowing the above comment deadline. Any
person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above
comment deadline. You may appeal this determinatiott to the Federal Way City Clerk, at the City of Federal Way
(address below), no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 28, 2010, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of
the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
Responsible Of'ficial: Greg Fewins
Title: Director, Department of Community Development Services �
Address: 33325 8"' Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 EXI ?��� 7
PAGE.�_���?
Date Issued: June 30. 2010 Signature: �i� '�""•
Doc.1.D. 54655 ��� � � �� �
PAGE_�.��__�__�
Stakeholders List
Updated June 21, 2010
Bob Cooper
Lloyd Enterprises Inc.
PO Box 3889
Federal Way, WA 98063-3889
bobc�llovdenterprisesinc. com
Chris Carrel
Friend of the Hylebos
PO Box 24971
Federal Way, WA 98093
ccarrel �att.blackberr .y net
Dan Biles
SBI Developing
PO Box 73790
Puyallup, WA 98373
danb e soundbuilthomes.com
Kurt Wilson
SBI Developing
PO Box 73790
Puyallup, WA 98373
(253) 539-8116
k�soundbuilthomes.com
Julie Ramseth
Harsch Investment Properties
13010 NE 20�` Street, Suite 450
Bellevue, WA 98005
�lier �harsch.com
Julie Ramseth
Harsch Investment Properties
13010 NE 20�' Street, Suite 450
Bellevue, WA 98005
(530) 450-0778
julier�a,harsch.com
Don Perry
Lakehaven Utility District
PO Box 4249
Federal Way, WA 98063
�err�(�a, lakehaven. or�
Tim Osborne, PE
Lakehaven Utility District
31627 1 Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)946-5540
tosborne(�a,lakehaven.or�
K:�2010 Code Amendments\0641-]0 Stakeholders List.doc
John Bowman
Lakehaven Utility District
PO Box 4249
Federal Way, WA 98063
(253) 946-5401
�owman�a,lakehaven. org
Gil Hulsmann
Abbey Road Group
PO Box 1224
Puyallup, WA 98371
(253) 435-3699
�il.hulsmannCc�abbevroad rg_oup.com
Jennifer povey
Windermere
33405 6`� Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(206) 423-8000
j sdovey(�a,windermere. com
John Norris
Norris Homes
2053 Faben Drive
Mercer Island, WA 98040
(206) 275-1901
j ohnnorrisna�comcast.net
Mark Clirehugh
GVA Kidder, Mathews, Segner
1201 Pacific Avenue, #1400
Tacoma, WA 98402
(253)722-1416
marckc(a� gvakm.com
Paul Lymberis
Quadrant Homes
PO Box 130
Bellewe, WA 98009
(425)452-6556
Paul lymberisna�uadranthomes. com
Paul Manzer
Pacland Development Consulting
11235 SE 6"' Street, Suite 220
Bellewe, WA 98004
(425) 453-9501
pmanzer(a��acland. com
Rod Leland
Federal Way Public Schools
31405 18�' Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
rleland(c�fwsd.wednet.edu
Sid White
Federal Way Public Schools
1066 South 320`� Street
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)945-5935
swhitena
Gordon Olson
South King Fire & Rescue
31617 1 S ` Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(206) 227-9301
gordon. olson(� southkin�e. orQ
Tom Raymond
South King Fire & Rescue
31617 1 S ` Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253) 946-7241
Tom.ra ond �southkin fg ue.org
Tom Pierson
Federal Way Chamber of Commerce
PO Box 4220
Federal Way, WA 98063
(253) 838-2605
tom�(a� federalwavchamber. com
Sam Pace
Sea/King County Assoc of Realtors
29839 154`� Avenue SE
Kent, WA 98042-4557
(253)630-5541
sampacena concentric.net
Ron Tremaine
Redstone Development
Land Acquisition and Development
17417 433 Street SE
North Bend, WA 98045
redstoneron(a�hotmail.com
425-831-7730 (w T
206-353-1761 (cel X���� ] 2
425-831-7783 (f �AGE ` �....�.��•
E��"'� � � �� ��
PAGE _.1___.�'� 1 of 3 �
Monte Powell
Powell Homes
29607 8�' Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
monte(a��owell-homes.com
Garrett J. Huffman
Master Builders Association
of King/Snohomish Counties
335 116�' Avenue SE
Bellewe, WA 98004
uffinan�cr�,mbaks. com
425-460-8236 (NIBAKS)
Brant A. Schweikl, P.E.
Managing Member
Schweikl and Associates, PLLC
705 South 9`�' Street, Suite 303
Tacoma, WA 98405
bschweikl(a�comcastnet
253-272-4451 (wk}
253-272-4495(fax)
Mike Behn
Quadrant, Development Manager
14725 SE 36`�' Street, Suite #200
PO Box 130
Bellevue, WA 98009
mike.behn�n,quadranthomes.com
425-452-6563
425-753-4866(cell)
Bob Roper
bob.r�er ,comcast.net
253-941-6954
Dale A Roper
The Roper Company
Landscape Architecture/Site Planning
816 Cherry Avenue, #3A
Sumner, WA 98390
253-891-1030
253-826-3891 (fax)
ro�erdale(�a,aol.com
Gary Hering
1439 SW 296`� Street
Federal Way, WA 98023
gjherin�,(�a,comcast.net
Tim Atkins
Big Mountain Enterprises
PO Box 1001
Enumclaw, WA 98022
tim ,bi�,mountainent.com
K:�2010 Code AmendmeMS\06-21-10 Stakeholders List.doc
Bill McCaffrey
WJM Studio
1911 SW Campus Drive, Suite 116
Federal Way, WA 98023
wi mccaffrey(a� comc ast. net
Tom Barghausen
Barghausen Consulting Engineers
18215 72n Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
tbar�hausen(�bar�hausen.com
Peter Townsend
1648 South 310`�' Street, Suite 6
Federal Way, WA 98003
253-839-2947
petert8 cni
Auburn, WA 98032
Mike Baily
LDG Architects
1319 Dexter Avenue, Suite 260
Seattle, WA 98109
206-283-4764
m ike(a� ld�architects. com
Chad Weiser
OTAK
10236 NE Points Drive, Suite 400
Kirkland, WA 98033-7897
206-442-1359
chad.weiser(c�otak.com
Christine Balyeat
New Concept Homes
PO Box 1229
Issaquah, WA 98027
hcbalyeat(a�hotmail.com
Mark Freitas
33516 9�' Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
253-838-8327
markfccimna,cs.com
Tres Kirkebo
Apex En�ineering
2601 35 Street, Suite 200
Tacoma, WA 98409
253-473-4494
kirkebo(a�apexengineerin .e net
Gary Martindale
The Commons of Federal Way
1928-B South Commons Blvd
Federal Way, WA 98003
253-839-6156
�martindale (c�tcafw. com
Jeff Greene
Greene Gasaway Architects
PO Box 4158
Federal Way, WA 98063-4158
253-941-4937
j effgg,arch(� seanet. com
Steve Hammer
Browleit Peterson Hammer Architects
6920 220 SW, Suite 200
Mountlake Tenace, WA 98043
steve(c�bpharch.com
Mel Easter
Johnson Braund Design Group
15200 52" Avenue South, Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98188
206-766-8300
mele(a�jbd .� com
Koong Cho
Royal Hospitality
(Hampton Inn)
15901 West Valley Highway
Tukwila, WA 98188
253-318-0908
koong�cna.comcast.net
Jim Jordan
(Saghalie Heights developer)
�rj ordan�isomedia.com
Mike Hovland
Hovland Architects
900 Meridian Avenue East, Ste 408
Milton, WA 98354
hovarcht(c�comcast.net
Dave Thorstad
406 South 289�' Place
Federal Way, WA 98003
dltarchitect(�a,comcast.net
Dan Coxall / '
Hammes Co. X� � � ��I Z
(St.. Francis Hospit �����
1325 4�` Avenue, �
Seattle, WA 98101
dcoxall(a�hammesco.com
E��"����� �
PAGE��.3___.
Tony Starkovich
1611 9�' Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
425-775-6552
vintage caQital(a(a�hotmail. com
Gareth Roe
BCRA
2106 Pacific Avenue, Suite 300
Tacoma, WA 98402
253-627-4367
groe�a,bcradesi n.� com
Brett Thomas brett�a,mountainconst.com
Connie Boyle connie.boylena,colliers.com
James Pate jamesQ(a�harsch.com
Jeff Oliphant �Io55 �aol.com
Jerry Heinz jerry.heinz .weyerhaeuser.com
Jon Potter votter.nwp�gmail.com
Randy Lloyd randyllo��xprint.blackberry.net
Rick Olson RickOlsonn
Rob Aigner roba e ,harsch.com
Rob Rueber arrueber(a��comcast.net
Scott Rhodes rhodesarchitecture(a�gmail.com
Sheppard Cutler swcna
Gordon Olson Gordon.olson(a�southkingfire.org
Steve Honeycutt shoneycutt�n,wildwaves.com
Heidi Swartz
Swartz Development
5724 30�' Avenue NE
Seattle, WA 98105
(206) 730-6933 cell
(206) 527-8999 fax
�swartz(a(a�comcast.net
�
EXM!���' 2
PAGE�? � L
K:�2010 Code Amendments\06-21-10 Stakeholders List.doc
EXM!���'�
PAGE � Pae
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating
to residential off-street parking; amending FWRC 19.05.140;
amending FWRC 19.130 Article VII; and repealing FWRC
19.130.230. (Amending Ordinance Nos. 09-610, 09-607, 09-595, 09-
593, 08-585, 07-573, 04-457, 00-375, 99-341, and 90-43)
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the need to periodically modify Title 19 of the Federal
Way Revised Code (FWRC), "Zoning and Development Code," in order to conform to state and
federal law, codify administrative practices, clarify and update zoning regulations as deemed
necessary, and improve the efficiency of the regulations and the development review process;
and
WHEREAS, this ordinance, containing amendments to development regulations and the
text of Title 19 FWRC, has complied with Process VI review, chapter 19.80 FWRC, pursuant to
chapter 19.35 FWRC; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the City Council to clarify appropriate
residential off-street parking surface materials within the City of Federal Way; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments would remove the undefined term of approved
impervious surface and replace with driveway or parking pad; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments would remove the large lot exemption and
provide equitable regulation; and
WHEREAS, non-substantive changes would consolidate similar code sections and
eliminate redundancies; and
WHEREAS, an Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was properly
issued for the Proposal on June 30, 2010, and no comments or appeals were received and the
DNS was finalized on July 28, 2010; and
Ordinance No. 10- Page 1 of 6
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission properly conducte.d a duly noticed public hearing
on these code amendments on July 21, 2010; and forwarded a recommendation of approval with
modification to the City Council as follows: pervious asphalt and pervious concrete as examples
for alternative surfaces that may be granted a modification from the director;
WHEREAS, the Land Use/Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council
considered these code amendments on August 2, 2010, and September 20, 2010, and
recommended adoption of the text amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission
with further modifications as follows: (1) gravel, pavers and LID methods are parking pad
options that do not require a modification and are allowed outright; and (2) grass is an acceptable
parking pad surface material except in front yards.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findin�s. The City Council of the City of Federal Way makes the following
findings with respect to the proposed amendments.
(a) These code amendments are in the best interest of the residents of the City and
will benefit the City as a whole by clarifying existing policies and intent.
(b) These code amendments comply with Chapter 36.70A RCW, Growth
Management.
(c) These code amendments are consistent with the intent and purpose of Title 19
FWRC and will implement and are consistent with the applicable provisions of the Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan.
(d) These code amendments bear a substantial relationship to, and will protect and
not adversely affect, the public health, safety, and welfare.
Ordinance No. 10- Page 2 of 6
(e) These code amendments have followed the proper procedure required under the
FWRC.
Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to chapter 19.80 FWRC and chapter 19.35 FWRC, and
based upon the recitals and the findings set forth in Section l, the Federal Way City Council
makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the
adoption of the proposed amendments:
(a) The proposed FWRC amendments are consistent with, and substantially
implement, the following Federal Way Comprehensive Plan goals and policies:
LUG1 Improve the appearance and function of the built environment.
LUG3 Preserve and protect Federal Way's single-family neighborhoods.
LUP14Maintain and protect the character of existing and future single-family
neighborhoods through strict enforcement of the City's land use regulations.
HP4 Maintain a strong code enforcement program to protect residential areas from
illegal land use activities.
(b) The proposed FWRC amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public
health, safety, and welfare as it will remove ambiguity regarding what is and what is not
considered appropriate vehicle storage.
(c) The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the public and the residents of
the City of Federal Way as it provides clarity to an existing code provision, aesthetic value to
residential areas, and equity among all single-family property owners.
Section 3. FWRC 19.05.140 is hereby amended to read as follows:
19.05.140 N definitions.
"Native vegetation" includes native, undisturbed areas or rehabilitation of previously
disturbed areas that consist of trees, plants, forest litter, and understory indigenous to the Pacific
Northwest or near natives that are suitable for the Pacific Northwest climate. Invasive species,
such as Himalayan Blackberry or Scotch Broom, are not native species.
Ordinance No. 10- Page 3 of 6
"Natural features" means physical characteristics of the subject property that are not
manmade.
"Natural materials " means materials chemically unaltered from their natural state.
"Natural surveillance" means easy observation of buildings, spaces, and activities by
people passing, living, working, or recreating nearby.
"Nonconformance" means any use, structure, lot, condition, activity or any other feature
or element of private or public property or the use or utilization of private or public property that
does not conform to any of the provisions of this title or that was not approved by the city of
Federal Way through the appropriate decision-making process required under this title.
"Nonliving groundcover" means gravel, chipped bark or similar nonpolluting material
through which water can freely percolate to the soil beneath.
"Nonmotorized vehicles " include but are not limited to travel and camp trailers, utility
trailers truck campers, and boat or vehicle transport trailers.
"Normal maintenance" includes interior and exterior repairs and incidental alterations.
"Normal maintenance and repair" includes, but is not limited to, painting, roof repair
and replacement, plumbing, wiring and electrical systems, mechanical equipment replacement
and weatherization. "Incidental alterations " includes, but is not limited to, construction of
nonbearing walls or partitions.
"Notice of determination " for sign regulations means the determination that the city
issues as to whether a sign conforms to this title and other sections of this Code.
"Nuisance vegetation " shall mean any tree or vegetation that, in the opinion of the city or
an expert approved by the city (such as, but not limited to, a professional forester, certified
arborist, or landscape architect), is an invasive variety, is an allergen, or due to its location is
causing or is likely to cause damage to a permanent structure, . or other economic or
environmental harm or harm to human, animal, or plant health that cannot be mitigated without
removal of the tree or vegetation.
"Nursing home" means the same as "convalescent center."
Section 4. FWRC Chapter 19.130 Article V is hereby repealed in its entirety.
. . .
. . . �-
. _ _
. - -
- - �
.
. ... - - -
Ordinance No. 10- Page 4 of 6
Section 5. FWRC Chapter 19.130 Article VII is hereby amended to read as follows:
Article VII. �e�c��ek�c-�e��ec�e��e�'�-�J-ek�e�,—�Residential Parkin�
and Vehicle Stora�e
Section 6. Chapter 19.130 Article VII of the Federal Way Revised Code is hereby
amended to add a new section Purpose and intent to read as follows:
19.130.245 Purpose and intent
The purpose of this article is to establish standards for parking and stora�e of vehicles for
residential zones and uses. These standards are intended to�rotect propertv values by reducin�
visual blight caused bv vehicle storage and to provide reasonable size limitations for stora�e of
commercial and recreational vehicles.
Section 7. Chapter 19.130 Article VII of the Federal Way Revised Code is hereby
amended to add a new section Parking and storage of motor vehicles and nonmotorized vehicles
to read as follows:
19.130.246 Parkin� and stora�e of motor vehicles and nonmotorized vehicles
� 1) All motor vehicle and nonmotorized vehicle parking and stora�e for residential uses
containing either detached or attached dwellings shall be in a garage, carport, drivewav, or a
parkin�pad except far recreational vehicles to be used as a temporarv dwellin�as specified in
FWRC 19.130.290(1). A�arking�ad shall accommodate the size of the vehicle and be
composed of asphalt cement gravel pavers or LID methods (pervious asphalt pervious
concrete etc.). Grass shall be an acceptable parking�ad surface except in the area located
between the primarv dwelling unit and the front property line and except as limited bv FWRC
19.130.240.
(2) An�gara�e carport or parkingpad shall have direct drivewav access.
(3) All vehicles considered junked wrecked dismantled, or inoperable must be stored in
a completely enclosed buildin�
Section 8. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and
severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of
this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall
not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to any
other persons or circumstances.
ection 9. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized
to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of
Ordinance No. 10- Page S of 6
scrivener/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any
referencesthereto.
Section 10. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective
date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 1 l. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five (5) days after passage
and publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of
20
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, LINDA KOCHMAR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, CAROL MCNEILLY, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.:
Ordinance No. 10- Page 6 of 6
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 5, 2010
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
ITEM #: � �
SUB.TEC'r: Speed Limit Ordinance — Proposed Changes ,
POLICY QUESTION Should Council amend Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 8.30.040 to codify existing
speed regulations at specified locations?
COMMITTEE Land Use and Transportation Committee
CATEGORY:
❑ Consent � Ordinance
MEETING DATE: August 2, 201 O
❑ Public Hearing
❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY Rick Perez, P.E., City Traffic Engineer � DEP'r: Public Works
Attachments: Ordinance
Discussion: In considering Ordinance 10-668 adopting new speed limits, Council adopted most of the ardinance
and delayed action on the portion regarding Milton Road S between SR 161 to S 376` Street and S 372 Street
between Milton Road S and Milton Road S in order to more fully consider the ramifications of maintaining the
existing speed limit of 35 mph.
In reviewing the ordinance, it was discovered that the Ordinance did not adequately distinguish the segment of
S 372° Street. The attached Ordinance specifically addresses S 372 Street in addition to Milton Road S. This
is necessary because Milton Road changes names to S 372° Street on one curve, and then changes names back to
Milton Road on the next curve.
In addition, staff has evaluated a variety of alternatives to address the stated concern of a resident on S 372
Street that the existing speed limit of 35 mph makes it difficult to safely egress residential driveways, in part due
to the number of trucks on the roadway and their increased stopping distance. These alternatives and -their
advantages, disadvantages, and costs are presented in the following table:
�`� � , ,� '� , . q , ; , r ; , ,, � ,� � �
'� �� �,� ,� ,,�� ,. �c�v� "`�s ; �s���°�� � , ��, ; r .z J� .,f
May be difficult to place
Enhanced Additional signage to May be necessary more signs without
curve warning draw attention to the anyway due to interfering with sight $300
signage sharper curve updated federal distance out of driveways.
standards
Unlikel to reduce s eeds
Hidden Additional signage to
Driveway draw attention to potential May reduce City Unlikely to reduce speeds $200
signs with �iveway conflicts liability
advisory speed
Cutting strips into
pavement to create audible May improve Noise impacts to adjacent
Rumble strips and tactile stimulus to $2,000
drivers to draw attention to compliance slightly residents
warning signs
K:\COl1NCIL\AGDBILLS\2010\10-OS-10 Speed Limit Ordinance - Proposed Changes - Agenda Bill.doc
Similar to speed reader
Interactive signs employed Police, Up to 5 mph speed
sign lights up a Slow
curve warning „ reduction Cost $10,000
signs Down for Curve warning approaching curve
if approach speeds exceed
a iven threshold
In conjunction with the
Interactive interactive curve warning Experimental device
raised sign, LED raised May draw attention $50,000
pavement pavement markers light up to curve No demonstrated benefit
markers if approach speeds exceed for additional cost.
a iven threshold
Unlikely to modify driver
behavior. $400 +
Reduced Lower the speed limit to Satisfies citizen o on oin
25 mph, per original SS /o of drivers would be g g
speed limit request violating new speed limit enforcement
citizen request
without continual costs
enforcement.
Lower the speed limit to
Photo 25 mph, per original Assures greater Cost $57,000/year
Enfarcement citizen request, and compliance
enforce with cameras
Options Considered:
l. Approve the proposed ordinance amending FWRC 8.30.040 as presented, maintaining existing speed
limit, and provide enhanced curve warning signage, Hidden Driveway warning signage, and
interactive curve warning signs.
2. Do not approve the proposed ardinance and provide direction to staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends forwarding Option 1 to the October 19, 2010 City Council
Ordinance agenda for enactment.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: }�,� C"c/ � ��I IRECTOR APPROVAL: I1, � �f',�
ca� Council Commrttee Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION N/A
Dini Duclos, C h a ir Jim Ferrell, Member Jack Dovey, Member
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION(S):
1 READING OF ORDINANCE (10/5/2010) I move to forward the ordinance to a second reading for enactment
on the 10/19/2010 City Council Consent Agenda.
2` READING OF ORDINANCE (10/19/2010) "I move approval of the proposed ordinance amending FWRC
8.30.040. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION: C
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ", )55
❑ DENIED 1sT reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION #
K:\COLJNCIL\AGDBILLS\2010\10-OS-10 Speed Limit Ordinance - Proposed Changes - Agenda Bill.doc
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to
Speed Limits; amending FWRC 8.30.040. (Amending Ordinance Nos.10-
668, 03-449, 00-364, 96-259, 93-177, and 90-29)
WHEREAS, The state traffic laws regulating the speed of vehicles shall be applicable upon
all streets within the city, except that the legislative authority of the city, as authorized by state law,
may declare and determine by order, rule or regulation, properly adopted, that certain increased or
decreased speed regulations shall be applicable upon specified streets or in certain areas, in which
event it is unlawful for any person to operate a vehicle at a speed in excess of the speed so
established when proper signs are in place giving notice thereof; and
WHEREAS, Whenever conditions are found to exist upon an arterial street or highway which
warrant an increase in the speed permitted by state law, the city council, subject to the approval of
the state highway commission in cases involving state highways, shall, determine and declare a
reasonable and safe maximum speed limit for such arterial street or highway, or portion thereof, not
to exceed 60 miles per hour; and
WHEREAS, Whenever it is deemed inadvisable for vehicles to operate at the maximum
speed allowed by state law on any portion of a street or public highway on account of a sharp
curvation, highway construction or repairs, excessive traffic, any dangerous condition, or other
temporary or permanent cause, the city council, subject to the approval of the State Highway
Commission in cases involving state highways, shall determine and fix a lower maximum speed ar
otherwise regulate a lesser speed; provided, that in no case shall the maximum speed be reduced to
less than 20 miles per hour; and
Ordinance No. 10- Page 1 of 4
WHEREAS, this ordinance is in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAlN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. FWRC 8.30.040 is hereby amended to read as follows:
8.30.040 Schedule.
The maximum speed limits set forth in the following schedule of speed limits are hereby
established as the reasonable and safe maximum speed limits to be effective at all times upon the
streets and highways designated in the schedule. The � mavor shall cause appropriate
signs to be erected on such streets and highways, giving notice of the speed limits, as provided in
this chapter.
(1) Speed limit 20 mph. No person shall operate a motor vehicle upon the following described
roads in excess of 20 mph:
All internal Parks roads.
18` Place South, between South 341 Place and South 344` Street.
(2) Speed limit 30 mph. No person shall operate a motor vehicle upon the following described
roads in excess of 30 miles per hour:
9th Avenue South, between South 336th Street and South 348th Street.
l lth Place South, between South 320th Street and South 324th Street.
20th Avenue South, between South 312th Street and South 320th Street.
16th Avenue South, between South 356th Street and South 364th Way.
23rd Avenue South, k�etween South 312th Street and South 324th Street.
South 304th Street, between Pacific Highway South and Military Road South.
South 317 Street, between 23rd Ave S Avenue South and 28 Avenue South.
South 324th Street, between llth Place South and 23rd Avenue South.
South 364th Way, between 12th Avenue South and 16th Avenue South.
Southwest 356th Street, between 20th Avenue Southwest and Pierce County.
(3) Speed limit 35 mph. No person shall operate a motor vehicle upon the following described
roads in excess of 35 miles per hour:
lst Avenue South, between South 296th Street and South 356th Street.
12th Avenue South, between South 372nd Way and South 364th Way.
16th Avenue South, between South Dash Point Road and Pacific Highway South, and between
Pacific Highway South and 348th Street.
lOth Avenue Southwest, between Southwest Campus Drive and 6th Avenue Southwest.
21 st Avenue Southwest, between Southwest Dash Point Road and Southwest 356th Street.
28th Avenue South, between South 304th Street and South 317th Street.
South 288th Street, between Pacific Highway South and F.A.I. #5.
South and Southwest 312th Street, between Southwest Dash Point Road and 28th Avenue South.
South and Southwest 320th Street, between 1,000 feet west of lst Avenue South and F.A.I. #5
Ordinance No. 10- Page 2 of 4
and between 21 st Avenue Southwest and 47th Avenue Southwest.
South 336th Street, between 1 st Way South and Weyerhaeuser Way South.
Southwest 336th Street, between 21 st Avenue Southwest and 26th Place Southwest.
Southwest 336th Way, between 26th Place Southwest and 30th Avenue Southwest.
Southwest 340th Street, between 30th Avenue Southwest and Hoyt Road Southwest.
South 344th Street, between Weyerhaeuser Way South and 1,500 feet east of Weyerhaeuser Way
South.
Southwest 344th Street, between 21 st Avenue Southwest and 35th Avenue Southwest.
South 348th Street, between 1 st Avenue and Pacific Highway South.
South 356th Street, between lst Avenue South and 16th Avenue South.
South 359th Street, between Pacific Highway South and 16th Avenue South.
South 373rd Street, between Pacific Highway South and South 372nd Way.
South 372" Street between Milton Road South and Milton Road South.
South 372nd Way, between 12th Avenue South and South 373rd Street.
Hoyt Road Southwest, between Southwest Dash Point Road and Pierce County.
Milton Road South, between Enchanted Parkway South and South 376th Street.
Redondo Way South, between South Dash Point Road and the South 284th Street (if extended).
Southwest Campus Drive, between 1 st Avenue South and 21 st Southwest.
South Star Lake Road, between South 272nd Street and Military Road South.
Weyerhaeuser Way South, between South 320th Street and South 349th Street.
(4) Speed limit 40 mph. No person shall operate a motor vehicle upon the following described
roads in excess of 40 miles per hour:
South and Southwest 320th Street, between 21 st Avenue Southwest and 1,000 feet west of 1 st
Avenue South and between F.A.I. #5 and 1,000 feet east of Weyerhaeuser Way South.
Southwest 356th Street, between lst Avenue South and 20th Avenue Southwest.
Military Road South, F.A.I. #5 at South Star Lake Road and F.A.I. #5 at South 307th Street (if
extended).
(5) Speed limit 45 mph. No person shall operate a motor vehicle upon the following described
roads in excess of 45 miles per hour:
Military Road South, between South 320th Street and State Route 18.
Section 2. Severabilitv. Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or
phrase of this chapter, or its application to any person or situation, be declared unconstitutional or
invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
chapter or its application to any other person or situation. The City Council of the City of Federal
Way hereby declares that it would have adopted this chapter and each section, subsection,
sentence, clauses, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more
Ordinance No. 10- Page 3 of 4
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, ar portions be declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
Section 3. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized
to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of
scrivener/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any
references thereto.
Section 4. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective
date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 5. Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days
from and after its passage and publication, as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of
�31�
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, LINDA KOCHMAR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, CAROL MCNEILLY, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.:
Ordinance No. 10- Page 4 of 4
�
`
UTY Of , T �
Federal Way
MEMORANDUM
TO: Federal Way City Council �
,I
FROM: Lynnette Hynden, Human Services Division Manager�
ViA: Brian Wilson, City Manger/Police Chief� / Q�/l�ro
DATE: October 5, 2010
RE: Human Services Generai Fund Grant Funding Allocation Revised Motion
BACKGROUND
On September 21, 2010 Human Services Staff brought before Council Business the proposed Human Services
Commission recommendations for funding both the COBG program/capital for 201 i and then the Human Services
General Fund Grant Funding allocations for 2011 and 2012. While CDBG programs/capital passed, HSGF
allocation consideration was set over under Counci! Bus�ness for October 5, 2010_
FINALIZING HSGF FUNOtNG RECOMMENDATIONS
The Human Services Division Manger recommends that the Federal Way City Councii consider approval of the
2011-12 Human Services Commission recommendations for Numan Services General Fund grants as allocated by
the commission and presented.
MOTION:
"I move approval of the Human Services Commission 2011/12 funding recommendations for the Human Services
General Fund Grants effective January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012 with total compensation of $430,000.00
and authorize the City Manager fo sign said agreements. "'
���.�.-���� H u ma n�ervices t:aener� [
��,.,� r�� � r� nt Re��r� m�r����i�n�
Cou nci I Presentation
October 5, 2010
Lyn nette Hynden
H u ma n Services Ma nager
�trate ies t�at �►�;I��, t�e �ecis�����
g
Housi ng a nd H u ma n Services Consol idated
Plan.
Four Strategies
designed with the
support and input
by City Cou nci I.
developed and
community's
and then Adopted
■ Strategy # 1- at least 37% of the
tota I budgeted fu nds m ust be
awa rded i n th is strategy.
w e re
:�� �
�' .� 1 l`�T e �
�trate . as c e
gY
o Address human services needs by
su pporti ng service models that encou rage
self-sufficiency and build a stronger
community.
,,, , �
� r 2 • mm ni 5 a ._ _.� � . � .
t . C�o u t �.
ate
g� Y .�
a Create pa rtnersh i ps with the com m u n ity
providers and others to help keep families
and neighborhoods free from fear and
crime.
�rrate 3: Address needs of s eci�l �ac���_�1��� .� �_
gY p _ ___
.. . .
tc� full arrlci ate in t e cor�lmunl�� ��
Yp p .
o Maintain support for service needs of low-
income special populations to reduce or
eliminate barriers.
y � yF
r 4 : � e rvlc � � � � r � rnw_ � � �� w � � .� � � � � � ��
�t ate
gY
- . . . .
- h � d���;�µ�
� r�� �t c
a es
o Support subsidy programming for low and
moderately-low income families to include
long term su pport for youth .
� ��.
�.11����«����e�a�� ��
0 Strategy #1 - Basic
Needs
$67,500, 16%
$124,000,
29%
$174,000,
40%
■ Strategy #2 -
Community Safety
O Strategy #4 - Low
Income Families with
Children
0 Strategy #3 - Special
Needs Population
$64,500, 15%
. � ._� � ,;,:, �;,
�. � i e s t�e �e c is �����:�
ro�es s t at +�u
o Human Services Commission reviews agency
compliance throughout the year.
❑ Relationships are formed between Human
Services Commissioners and agencie� outside of
the funding cycle. Staff engage frequently with
agencies to meet the needs of the residents.
a Every other March, funding announcements and
applications are made available. Preliminary
awards are recommended by the Commission to
the City Cou nci I.
�. 1 n .��N y�: � �; �: �� � �
�icat o �.
o Electronic applications are completed between
March/April 2010.
o Commissioners were divided into four strategy
sub-groups to review, score and assess
community needs to make funding
recom mendations.
a Agencies were notified of the Com m ission's
preliminary recommended grant awards and
invited to a public hearing.
,, ar . '
1 1 n r�s ��or.�,:_
omm s s o e
❑ Appl ications were scored with a com prehensive
score sheet.
t�� Agencies scoring above the 90 percentile out of l00%
were considered first.
�N Agencies scoring below the approved scores per strategy
were set asid�e and other factors were then taken into
consideration
Performance from pervious y�ars
�h.
4
�:�
�;,
;..,: .
�
Y
F
Y
Gap in necessary services for FW residents
: Leveraging grant dollars with agency dollars
�o Location of agency - whether local FW or Regional
Maximizing the direct line of service to the community with
the dollars to the client - lowest administrative cost
overhead.
w iit '� il �r
estions from ast C;ouncil �1i�ee����
��
o Were ��new" programs added at the
expense of others?
NO. New agencies might have been
selected to provide the sa me or i m proved
services that otherwise would have left a
gap.
a Will the Agency cease
tota I f u n d s req u ested
- NO. Agencies learn
streams of funding,
agencies.
to operate if the
are not awarded?
to balance multiple
especially the larger
" _ . . �� ..
.� �J l�l .�� 1�1 � e nc ie � ��
o All agencies funded are Non-Profit (50103),
requ i red to have reserves as wel I as the
requirement to leverage other funds and/or
fundraise to enhance what is provided by the
City.
❑ The City's fu nd i ng shou Id not be seen as thei r
only source of revenue.
a Agency budgets are reviewed and considered
when making funding recommendations.
�, � . --� � �
e
nc �un in
a Agencies (regardless of size) who asked
for multiple program dollars most often do
not get the fu I I req uested a mou nt, but
rather a percentage of the total combined.
�� � o The ca pacity of the agency to operate
multiple programs was considered.
__,
�<
� r� �� � .� �.z1�� �
��r��
��
YWCA-
Birth to 3 �--- B&G Club
WWEE �
VCCC -- � ' CCS -- Center for Children
� � & Youth Justice
St. Vin/De Paul
Senior Services
KCPublic Health
Dept ��
.
-- Child Care Res.
Child/Home Soc.
Navos
-CIS
Crisis Clinic
DAWN
MSC-
KCSAR ��
KC Bar --'�
KYFC
--------- - D.family Serv.
���
,,
FWCCN����— Emer/Feed
Prog.
FWSC
��- FUSION
1 � � �� ����,,
JFS Family Dev �
Health Point
1�1 /� .�� �. � i�����:��.���u���
e c
�
a Birth to 3- Family Services
o Boys and Girls Club - FW Safe Zone
n
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
Catholic Community Services - Vol. Chore; REACH Out;
Emergency Assistance Programs
Center for Children and Youth Justice - Safe Havens
Child Care Resources -- Homeless Childcare
Children's Home Society - Early Head Start
Communities In Schools - Mentoring; Site Coordinators
Crisis Clinic - Teen Link; Crisis Line
DAWN - Housing; Community Advocacy; Crisis Line for DV
Dynamic Family Serv. - Children with Special Needs.
a Emergency Feeding Program - Hunger Relief.
o FW Communit Caregiving Network - Rental Assistance
Emer enc Shelter.
/ 9 Y
o Federal Way Senior Center - Nutrition Program
o FUSION - Transitional Housing.
.�
e nc /� .� r o � ms c o n� .,:
_________w_._.____.___..__.�____ __ . ._ ___._________ .. __ _. _ _ ____ __ . _� _._ __.
o Health Point - Dental; Medical Services
a Institute for Family Development - PACT
a Jewish Family Services - Immigrant Services
o Kent Youth and Family Services - Clinical Services
o King County Bar Foundation - Community Legal Services
o King County Sexual Assault Resource Center - Sexual
Assault Services
a Multi-Service Center - Emergency Shelter; Food and
Clothing Bank; General Education Program.
o NAVOS - Employment Services
a KC Public Health Department - Medical/Dental Van
o Senior Services - Meals on Wheels; Volunteer
Transportation
o St. Vincent de Paul Society - Emergency Services
o Valley Cities - Mental Health; Youth Development; Girls
Circle
a Wash. Women's Employment and Education - REACH Plus
a YWCA - Children's Domestic Violence Program
1�I u.m��, �:::
a 17 cities jointly worked on an electronic
application to reduce costs for agencies.
a The 15-page application with instructions was
completed by each agency.
0 79 a ppl ications were received with i n the ti me
limit
o Over 1 million dollars in funds were requested
0 7 page rati ng tool was com pleted by each
Commissioner on the applications assigned to
thei r strategy.
0 40 programs were funded via 28 agencies.
,� ,
�.,onc �us ���. �_
o Human Services
vol u nteers. They
months per year.
Commissioners are dedicated
meet at least 11 out of the 12
a Staff col la borate with ather
cities on a monthly basis to
performance, service model
local King County
discuss agency
trends and
leverag�ng agency resources to meet needs
our local residents.
of
,
1�.�L�.Y��
a Updating the City of Federal Way's Housing and
Human Services Consolidated Plan.
a Determining whether the City should be a dire�t
entitlement city vs. joint agreement city for
CDBG.
❑ Continuation of building
monitoring performance
agencies.
agency relationships,
, and supparting local
- �
� estions:�
o Thank you for your time and
consideration.
o Thank you to the Human Services
Commissioners!
� o Final thou hts from Chair Robert
g �
. Wroblewski.