Loading...
FEDRAC PKT 09-30-2003City of Federal Way "City coUncil .' ,200'3. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC COMMENT 3. COMMITTEE BUSINESS A. Approval of the'August 26, 2003 Minutes B. Economic Development Report (Doherty) C. City Code Amendment - Massage Practitioners (Richardson) D. Update of City Council's Purchasing Policies (Richardson) E. Early Retirement of Bonds (Wang) F. August Monthly Financial Report (Olson) G. Vouchers (Olson) 4. OTHER Actio~ Informatim Actim Actim Informatim Actim Actiot 5. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 6. NEXT MEETING: October 28, 2003 4:00 p.m. Committee Members: Michael Park, Chair Eric Faison Mary Gates I ~CfwmainWOL I IdatalMslFINANCElFINCOMMTI2003i092310923 Agenda.doc lwen Wang, Management Services Director Jason Suzaka, Management Analyst (253) 661-4061 ' CitY of. Federal ....Way '..., c':',:'," ';: ~ ~' ' · :". ' ': ·" · CoUnCil · .Cit:v · ;,. . . .:' ,.;: . ..~' ~,~.~,~.~ .'-' .. "" ~'-i': '.:' - -~ .... , . e:~., '"" · · . ':2.'F. in~nce/Econo'mic Development/R~gional.Affairs'.C:.,0,~fiii'ttee· .. ~" ':':' "(~" ~ '"' .';~ 'i''?'' i . : ':~"': · :"'"'":"":" ~'"~ ~''~' "~': '"': '":'""~ ?"' "':';'":':'¥" '~:"~*''': ' ' "= ' "' ' : T. ue~itay}~ ~ugust':.26, ~003 ~.:Z:~.U ~p~m?~. -'..:., '.,,~., .' .... :-....,.: ..... :.~ II~II I-- MINUTES Committee Members in Attendance: Chaff Michael Park, Member Mary Gates, Member Eric Faison. City Council Members in Attendance: Council Member Linda Kochmar Staff Members in Attendance: Iwen Wang, Management Services Director; David Moseley, City Manager; Derek Matheson, Assistant City Manager; Karen Kirkpatrick, Assistant City Attorney; Michael Olson, Deputy Director of Management Services; Rob Van Orsow, Solid Waste/Recycling Coordinator; Jason Suzaka, Management Analyst. Others in Attendance: None. CALL TO ORDER Chair Michael Park called the meeting to order at 2:02 p.m. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 3. COMMITTEE BUSINESS a) Approval of the August 26, 2003 meeting minutes Motion to approve the July 22, 2003 meeting minutes. Motion seconded and carried. b) Legislative and Regional Affairs Update Presented by Derek Matheson Mr. Matheson reported that the lobbyist is keeping an eye on Sen. Jim Horn and his opinion that local governments should not be using grants from other sources to use as the local match on TIB (Transportation Improvement Board) grants. This strategy has typically worked well for Federal Way. The Board will discuss this issue at their September retreat. Cary Roe, Doug Levy, and Don Wickstrom (City of Kent) are meeting with the TIB Executive Director (a Federal Way resident) to discuss their concerns on this issue. AWC (Association of Washington Cities) is forming a committee to discuss the next step in transportation issues. Although the 5-cent package is funding many hrq~ortant projects, it is only fimded through the next two years, so staff will monitor to make sure that the area's projects are funded at the right time. Ms. Gates advised that staff should track in particular the temptation by policymakers to try to change the timing of project funding, and even try to move Federal Way's projects up in the funding schedule. U.S. Congressman Adam Smith will be in Federal Way on Friday, September 26th at 3pm. Staff will work on an agenda for the meeting. Staff is also trying to get staff from our other legislative A-1 c) d) e) representatives as well. Doug Levy is also going to meet with departmental directors and key staff in September in order to start work on the 2004 legislative agenda, which staff hopes to bring back to FEDRAC on October 28ta and full Council on November 18t~. Mr. Matheson will be absent from next month's meeting, as he will be on vacation. 2004-05 Solid Waste/Recycling Division Grants Presented by Rob Van Orsow Mr. Van Orsow reviewed the memo with the committee. Letters of intent have been sent out to the County for each of the three grants to reserve our funding allocations. The three grants are: Coordinated Prevention Grant, Waste Reduction/Recycling Grant, and the Local Hazardous Waste Management Prograrr~ After the grants are reviewed by the committee, a resolution would need to be passed by the Council (attached). No city fund expenditures would be used, since outside grant money is being used for the match. Councilmember Gates complimented Mr. Van Orsow on the table he created laying out the grant projects and funding amounts. She felt that this method of presenting information could also be used to address Senator Horn's views on local governments using grant money. Motion to forward the resolution to full Council for approval with a "do-pass" recommendation. Motion seconded and carried. Insurance Renewal Update Presented by Iwen Wang No action is needed by Council if the City is planning on renewing insurance; however, notice will need to be given by September 1, if the City is planning on terminating its coverage with CIAW (Cities Insurance Association of Washington). So far, staffhas been very happy with the services provided by CIAW. Because CIAW uses a different policy year (September-September) than what the City was using with St. Paul, there will need to be a budget adjustment made to accommodate. Premiums are expected to increase by about 12.5%; however, no broker will be needed by using CIAW, so there will be some savings realized to go along with the budgeted 10% increase. July 2003 Monthly Financial Report Presented by Michael Olson Michael Olson reviewed the July Monthly Financial Report (MFR) with the Committee. Operating revenues are slightly below YTD budget (0.3%), as are sales tax revenues (4.4%). Utility tax revenues continue to be below budget (11.6%); however, real estate excise taxes continue to be strong (61.9% above YTD budget). Correction: The office building on 8tn Ave. S. should read "USAA, "not "USSA "as stated. Staffwill look into why manufacturing seems to be so far below 2002 levels. The committee also asked staff to produce a month-to-month showing of sales tax revenues from the SeaTac Mall. Right of Way Permits/fees are not considered stable. The police department's overtime expenditures continue to decline; at this rate, 2003 overtime expenditures will be approximately 40% below 2002 levels. A main contributor to this decline is H:'~INAlqCE'O:INCOMMTX2003\082oq0826 Minutes.doc A-2 o the fact that the police department is nearly fully staffed, which has cut down on patrol call-backs. Termination pay consists of vacation pay and other "buyouts" when an employee is terminated. There was a question regarding the utility tax subsidy given for Celebration Park, and whether or not too much of a subsidy was being given. Staffreplied that the expenditure figures do not include the costs of program coordination. In addition, the utility tax subsidy covers the full year; whereas the expenditure figures account for only the first six months of the year. YTD Gambling tax revenues are down compared to 2002, mainly because of increased competition in the area, and some of the new casinos are not doing as well as hoped. Motion to accept the monthly financial report and forward to full Council for approval. Motion seconded and carried. f) Vouchers Presented by Michael Olson Mr. Olson presented the vouchers for approval. Motion to accept the vouchers and forward to full Council for approval Motion seconded and carried. OTHER None. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS a) City Center Redevelopment b) Business License Amendment - Massage Practitioners There was some discussion on whether or not a second FEDRAC meeting should take place to discuss economic development issues, specifically in the downtown area. One option was to add a line item in the agenda for next month's scheduled meeting to discuss this particular topic. The committee could then see how it works and if a second meeting is needed. The committee decided that for next month's meeting they would create in the agenda a line item labeled "economic development report." They directed Patrick Doherty (Deputy Director of Community Development - Economic Development) to create an agenda for that line item to discuss the topic. This line item is for next month's agenda only - the committee will decide where to go fi.om there. NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING September 23, 2003 at 4:00 pm. in the Mt. Baker Conference Room. (Please note time change) ADJOURN Chair Michael Park adjourned the meeting at 2:50pm. Recorded by Jason Suzaka H:WINANCEWINCOMMT~2003\0826~0826 Minutes.doc A-3 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Date: To: Via: From: Subject: September 24, 2003 Finance, Economic ~._ev,.,el,,ol;~aent and Regional Affairs Committee David H. Mos~'~m~er Patrick Dohe~e t~/y Director, Community Development Services Economic DeVelopment Division activities - August & September RELATED TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA · Second EconomiC Opportunity Response Team meeting set up for October 8th, 7:30 a.m. at Twin Lakes Golf& Country Club. Invitations sent. · International Trade Workshop set up for October 1st, 9:00 to 11:30 at Twin Lakes Golf& Country Club. · Content for Economic Development website submitted to IT team; officespace, com contribution for site/building locator received, work continuing on remaining web pages and links RELATED TO LTAC AGENDA · Tourism Enhancement Grant 2003 Second Round in September. · Worked with events planners on Reebok Women's Triathlon Series, including LTAC special meeting of 9/5/03 to consider the proposal. Reebok chose Federal Way 9/9/03 ! · Worked with events planners on Korean sports/culturalfestivalplanning · Coordinatedproduction of second draft version of tourism rack card for approval at 9/5/03 LTAC mtg and final version for approval at 10/10/03 LTAC mtg. RELATED TO PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WORK PROGRAM · Staffmeetings/work on potential redevelopment incentives in City Center related to possible subsidy of grid street improvements and/or parking garage. To be raised for discussion again at 9/30/03 FEDRAC mtg. · SEPA Planned Action EIS initiated. Public scoping meeting held 9/17/03. Work on Draft EIS has begun, with pubIication first part of 04. · City Center multifamily code amendments - research completed, work has resumed in tandem with City Center SEPA Planned Action EIS/Ordinance · Participation on City website redesign staffteam Memo to FEDRAC Economic Development Activities Page 2 of 3 RECENT MEETINGS/CONTACTS (August-September) August · Inquiry from Credit Advisors Inc re call center - letter and info packet sent EDC referral regarding call center (R&R Partners) and expanding business from Eastside (Sharebuilder) - letters and info packets sent Inquiry regardingfinancingfor Metropolitan Market · Inquiry about City Center residential tax exemption (referred by Masterbuilders) - but property not in district · Made contact with broker for Capital One former call center building and shared FW info and recent inquiries (above) · Inquiry from Opus NW about development activity in Federal Way and City Center · Attended Kent-sponsored interagency discussion ofpotential Advanced Manufacturing Center in South King County · Met with Sea-King Co EDC Vice President to discuss marketing strategies for Federal Way - marketing to top fastest-growing businesses in US. Request for assistance from localproperty owner for economicprofile information, etc., to potential new cinema tenant Contact with Maura 0 'Neill, President of Explore Life, and discussion ofpotential role for Federal Way · Attended SeaTac Mall renaming workshop · Attended International Council of Shopping Centers "Idea Exchange" in Blaine and set up Federal Way table with information. · Took out ad in Business Guide for the Puget Sound · Attended Southwest King County Economic Development Initiative mtg. · Attended King County Economic Development Officials Forum, presented by EDC · EDC meeting · LTAC meeting September · Staffmeetings on city center redevelopmentfinancing strategies · Meetings with eventplanners on Korean sports/culturalfestivalplanning; met with Mike Park 9/4. · LTAC meeting - consideration of Reebok Women's Triathlon Series in Federal Way · Lunch meetings with Councilmembers to discuss economic development agenda · EVC meeting · Meetings regarding new City website redesign · Inquiry from Chicago real estatefirm marketing the Capital One call center building regarding Federal Way market info Memo to FEDRAC Economic Development Activities Page 3 of 3 · Inquiryfrorn State Office of Tourism for fall-foliage related events in Washington State_for Today Show writer Inquiry from State Office of Tourism for winter/spring tourism packages~events for British Columbia travel rnagazine · Inquiry through Seattle-King Co EDCfrorn Kubota Corp of Japan, looking for approx. 15, 000 SF of industria/flex space for light assembly plant · Youth Collegiate Regional Triathlon sited at Five-Mile Lake for next year · Chamber Business Showcase · Telecon with Doug Levy, City lobbyist, to discuss City's economic development agenda for Legislative session · Press contacts about the City Center Planned Action, International Trade Workshop and tourism promotion program. · Presentation to Coldwell-Banker broker monthly breakfast in Fife ~acorna and Federal Way brokers) · EDC meeting · FEDRAC meeting to update Crnte on economic development activities, share what other cities are doing for city center redevelopment, and discuss redevelopment incentives for City Center AYPROVAL B'~," . '. ' Commit~hai~} Comm~ttee'l~mber CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Date: To: Via: From:~ Subject: September 24, 2003 Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee David H. Mos,~ity Manager Patrick Dohe(ty~ty Director, Community Development Services City Center Rvdevelopment Strategies BACKGROUND: On OctOber 15, 2002 City Council directed staff to continue to study potential ways the City could financially participate in right-of-way (ROW) improvements and/or public parking facilities in the City Center as incentives to desired redevelopment. In addition, City Council requested additional research into the provisions of the Community Renewal Act that might allow the use of tax-increment financing. At the November 20, 2002 FEDRAC meeting these issues were further discussed. Staff research into the Community Renewal Act yielded the conclusion that the tax-increment financing provisions available through the Act would be no more advantageous than what the City could do on its own with its own portions of both the property tax and sales tax within whatever redevelopment area it wished to describe. 'Regarding financial participation in either ROW improvements or public parking facilities, FEDRAC directed staff to continue to research funding mechanisms for these potential tools, with.the cautionary note that pending decisions about the City's community center/pool and municipal facilities may have to be resolved before a clear understanding of the available funding would be possible. Councilmembers additionally · requested that staff explore prioritization of City Center grid streets as a way of helping to decide where to concentrate the potential use of limited funds. While not definitive, discussions with Public Works staff since that time have yielded only one clear top priority grid street in the City Center: continuation of future 21 st Ave S between S. 316th and 320m Streets after Soun~d Transit improves a portion of this street adjacent to the new Transit Center. In fact, the highest-priority grid street would actually be the "ring road" connecting 11th Ave S and Pacific Highway S; however, this road is at the far western edge of the City Center. Now that the decisions regarding both the community center/pool and municipal facilities building have been made, staff has resumed study of the funding sources potentially available for financial participation in the above-cited city center facilities as incentives to city center redevelopment. As a preface to some preliminary recommendations for continued work on these issues, staff has been asked to provide a brief description of other nearby cities' redevelopment efforts. Memo to FEDRAC City Center Redevelopment Strategies Page 2 of 7 City Center Redevelopment Strategies from Other Cities To help illustrate the possibilities with respect to City Center redevelopment strategies, here are brief summaries of the redevelopment efforts of five local cities: Kent Kent Station is a $130 million, 530,000 square-foot retail, education, entertainment and residential project, slated to create a community's focal point and identity, set for groundbreaking in 2004, with a 2005 opening. The project is located adjacent to Sound Transit's Sounder Commuter Rail Station and parking garage, Kent's existing downtown and the King County Regional Justice Center. This project will be developed by Langly Properties and Tarragon DeveloPment on 19.9 acres of property that the City purchased in 2001. The City has contributed financially in the following ways: · $4 million contribution to Sound Transit's parking facility for the Sounder train station to ensure that a parking structure - not parking lot - be built. · $14 million to purchase the 19.9-acre site. · Approximately $2 million in right-of-way and infrastructure improvements, which leveraged additional State and federal grant monies. Kent accessed up to $10 million from King County in its Section 108 revolving credit funds to help purchase the property initially. These funds needed to be paid back within 30 months, which Was just completed this past summer. An RFP was issued and the above-cited developers were awarded the project, based on their experience, expertise and ability to perform. The developers will be buying back the property in phases at current market appraised value(s). It is likely that Kent will not recoup the entirety of its purchase price due to the slump in commercial property values since they purchased the property, the public components of the project that will benefit the city and residents, and the specific program tied to the site that affects the free-market appraisal of the property. Burien Burien Town Square is the mixed-use redevelopment of a 10-acre site in downtown Burien, slated for new civic facilities, retail space, housing, offices, hotel uses, parking - all bordering a major public square/open space. Burien already owned a 1.5-acre portion of this site where its existing City Hall is sited. Approximately 6.5 acres adjacent to City Hall (containing an abandoned Gottschalk's department store and other buildings) was purchased by the City for approximately $5.1 million. The City has issued a letter of intent to purchase the remaining 2-acre parcel, Memo to FEDRAC City Center Redevelopment Strategies Page 3 of 7 although as the developers are soon to be selected for this project, it is likely the City will . simply step aside and let the developers purchase this remaining piece. The City has budgeted at total of $9 million from its CIP budget (funded largely by real estate excise tax revenues) and $1 from its Parks budget for the property acquisitions and other improvements/contributions, although current estimates are that the total City expenditure will be substantially less than that total amount. The City expects to break even or make a profit in turning over the project to the selected developers, as well as anticipates a substantial increase in property tax and sales tax revenues over the next ten years. Tulovila Tukwila Village is a 12Zacre mixed-use development along the east side of International Boulevard (Highway 99) between S. 140th and 144th Streets. The $50 to 100 million project would contain office, retail and residential buildings in a "village square" format with a public plaza, ground-floor storefronts, and office and residential space above. The City had two principal objectives with this project: 1) to reinvigorate a "blighted" stretch of International Boulevard (crime, drugs, disinvestments, etc.), and 2) to create a city center for a city that has no "Main Street" and no community focal point. The City employed the recently updated Community Renewal Act provisions to designate a community renewal area and project, thus freeing itself for less constrained use of public funds. One of the difficulties associated with this site was its multiple property ownerships. The City created a redevelopment plan, updated its Comprehensive Plan, created design guidelines and issued and RFP. The City bought the properties, without using condemnation (and therefore may have paid slightly higher prices), for a total of approximately $9 million. In addition, the City will contribute approximately $2 million for frontage improvements along the subject portion of International Boulevard. The City used general fund revenUes and has issued bonds against those revenues. The City anticipates that it will sell the property at a minor discount from its total acquisition price - again because outfight purchase of all properties (to avoid condemnations) may have. led to somewhat inflated purchase prices. Lynnwood Private-sector and public-sector interests have united to create a new City Center Plan at a cost of over $500,000, split evenly between the sectors. The plan is targeting greater densities and heights of commercial and residential development, as well as civic uses and open space, to try to create a "Downtown Lynnwood." Alderwood Mall, at the edge of the "downtown," is making a $50 million, 400,000-square-foot expansion with more retail shops, restaurants, a cinema complex and three parking structures. No City money is involved. A $32 million, 60,000-square-foot convention center is being planned and is due to open in 2005. It is financed by the South Snohomish County Public Facilities District, funded with lodging tax revenues and a portion of the sales tax revenues that is credited back by the State for such projects (not available in King County). Memo to FEDRAC City Center Redevelopment Strategies Page 4 of 7 University Place This city is pursuing redevelopment of an 8-acre parcel as a mixed use Town Center consisting of 300-500 housing units (condos, townhouse, leased units) and 325,000 square feet of "lifestyle" type retail (i.e., U-Village with housing on top). The retail will be located above a 1778-stall parking garage and the housing will be located above the retail. The City obtained a line of credit (currently 2% interest rate) with the Bank of America. The line of credit is for 3 years with a possible extension if needed. In the Spring of 2003, the City spent $8.6 million to purchase 8 acres of land within their Town Center · Zone. The City also entered into an agreement to purchase 4 acres owned by the library for $4 million and to move the existing library to a smaller site within the project area. The City has spent an additional $500k in various consulting fees, for a total expenditure of $13.1 million. Before purchasing the land, the City invested approximately $200k of the $500k in research activities, such as hiring an architectural firm to establish new design guidelines, a planning consultant to deal with zoning issues, retail and housing consultants to conduct market studies, and an economist to work out the project finances. The'City sent out requests for qualifications earlier this month. The RFQ's are due back the middle of October and they City will select a preferred developer in November with a final development agreement to be executed next spring. The City expects that clearing of the site will begin next April and construction to be completed in 2006. The City views its primary contribution to be the consolidation of the land and the removal of the tenants. The City expects full cost recovery with respect to the land purchases (i.e., $13.1 million) and expects that the developer will pay for construction of the garage. Remaining items, such as road and sidewalk construction, on-street parking, and other infrastructure improvements remain subject to negotiation. If the City fails to get a developer to do the entire project, the City's fallback plan is to sell off the parcels for redevelopment in chunks over time -- holding and leasing out the spaces until sales are finalized. The City views its prospects as extremely good in significant part due to the rapid progression of the project (There has not been a lot of time for the market to change from the time City began land purchases to time when final development agreement is signed -- RFQ out 2 months after land purchases completed; preferred developer selected 1 month after RFQ due; final developer agreement signed 5 months later.) Memo to FEDRAC City Center Redevelopment Strategies Page 5 of 7 Potential Funding Options for City Center ROW Improvements and/or Parking Facilities As a reminder, in previous FEDRAC discussions it was noted that two readily identifiable barriers to more intensive redevelopment of city center property are potentially costly grid-street ROW improvements and/or the provision of costly structured parking necessary for denser development. For this reason City Council directed staff to continue to research potential mechanisms for funding financial participation in key grid-street ROW improvements and/or public parking facilities. Key to the City's participation in such improvements has been the desire to keep such participation associated withpublic improvements. With ROW improvements, this is naturally easy to maintain, but with parking facilities, it will be imperative to maintain clarity with any prospective private-sector partners that City participation must be restricted to parking facilities (or portions thereOf) that can be accessible to the general public, as well as serve a site's commercial or other uses, or which can be bought back by the private interest for use as private parking facilities. Potential Funding Options With the City Hall and Community Center projects' financing largely funded, a couple of funding sources could become available for economic development purposes. The 1/2% utility tax dedicated to Public Safety facility bonds is projected to generate $600k - $625k a year. That is $180k to $200k more than the current debt service on'the bond, which will be fully retired in 2012. The city could use this additional revenue.as a source to fund projects on annual basis or to back the floating of a 30-year bond for approximately $6 million to create a pool of funds available for city center redevelopment projects, such as those mentioned above. ¸2. With the move of the City Hall into the Paragon Building, the current City Hall would be available for sale or for rent. This could potentially generate lump sum proceeds or potential net rental income of approximately $230,000 annually, which could also potentially be used to supplement the redevelopment fund pool. As discussed last year, the City could earmark property and sales tax revenue increments from partner projects to replenish the redevelopment fund, if so desired. ROW Improvement Alternative As an alternative to financing and building the grid streets now with the participation of City funds, the City could also consider allowing developers to dedicate needed ROW land to the City now and defer the actual ROW improvements until such time as the adjacent property is redeveloped, or sooner, at the City's discretion. In this approach the City could lower the up-front burden of up to 2/3 of adjacent ROW improvement potentially to a time when adjacent properties are developed and owners of properties Memo to FEDRAC City Center Redevelopment Strategies Page 6 of 7 along both frontages would be obligated to improve only their respective one-half of the ROW. This option could remove one of the two redevelopment obstacles without requiring the City to invest significant capital upfront, thus allowing the limited resources to be used for other economic development purposes. However, this alternative may not be feasible in every redevelopment scenario,' as some ROW improvements may be necessary to mitigate increased traffic impacts. Potential Use of Funds There are many potential mechanisms available to use these funds to help spark desired city center redevelopment, but perhaps the most equitable would be to issue an RFP during a specified time frame, whereby the City would make known its willingness to partner with private developers to provide associated ROW improvements or public parking facilities. A set of criteria would be developed that could include at least the following items: · the City's expectations regarding desired development (mixed-use, multi-story, efficient use of land, potential for public uses, etc.), · track record with similar development · financial impact analysis (estimated property and sales tax increments) · financial "gap" analysis (to determine financially necessary level of contribution) · buy-back provisions (for parking) Given the nature of the response, financial need of the respondents, etc., multiple partnerships could be possible throughout the City Center. NEXT STEPS: Staff recommends that the Committee indicate which of the following potential redevelopment funding sources and mechanisms should continue to be explored and developed by staff, with the expectation that draft ordinances, policies and/or procedures would be developed and presented back to FEDRAC and eventually on to City Council: 1. RFP's for potential public-private partnerships to help fund ROW improvements and/or public parking facilities. 2. Commitment of a portion of the 1/2% utility tax revenues from the Public Safety bond (approximately $180-200,000 per year now) and potentially all these revenues ($600 - $625k per year after 2012) to create approximately $6 million redevelopment fund. 3. Commitment of incremental property and sales tax revenues from public-private partnership redevelopment sites to help retire redevelopment fund bond and/or replenish fund. 4. Commitment of proceeds from selling or renting existing City Hall to help retire redevelopment fund bond and/or replenish fund. 5. Further exploration of the feasibility of requiring delayed ROW improvements until adjacent properties are redeveloped, where possible. Memo to FEDRAC City Center Redevelopment Strategies Page 7 of 7 Upon Committee direction, staff will proceed to develoP more fully any or all of these ideas, including the following: · draft RFP criteria, · financial analysis of the City's financial participation, including analysis of how much ROW improvement and/or participation in parking structure would be possible, · financial analysis of potential incremental tax revenues coming back to the City, · feasibility analysis of alternative ROW improvement timing, as mentioned above. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Date: TO: VIA: FROM: Subject: NOvember 20, 2002 Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee David H. MorAlity Manager Patrick Dot~rt~t)~irector, Community Development Services City CenterLt~ffdetrglopment Tools Pursuant to City Council direction at its October 15, 2002 meeting., staff have researched the following: 1) right-of-way (ROW) improvement standards within the City Center, 2) the feasibility of implementing a Community Renewal Plan and consequent access to tax- increment financing provisions, pursuant to the Community Renewal Act, and 3) potential City funding of ROW improvements and/or participation in a public parking structure. Staff were requested to report back to FEDRAC with findings and seek continued direction. ROW Improvement Standards City Staff focused on the City Center grid streets, identified in the Comprehensive Plan as intended to break up the City Center's large superblocks, since they are the rights-of- way with the most potential improvement remaining and the most potential to be seen as financial obstacles to desired redevelopment of City Center properties. The intent behind researching the grid street improvement standards was to determine whether their current improvement standards might possibly require more than the minimum improvement necessary and, therefore, could potentially be revised. Public Works Department staff indicated that the improvement standards for grid streets (Roadway Cross Section Q) were analyzed and revised downward in 1998 during the last substantive revision to the · Transportation Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. These standards currently describe a 70-foot right-of-way, with a 12-foot sidewalk (minimum necessary in the City Center), an 8-foot curbside parking lane, and a 12-foot travel lane in each direction. Only a very ~ minimal additional reduction in these standards (e.g., a one-foot reduction in the width of the travel lane) would be possible without compromising safety. Given that these standards were analyzed and revised so recently, that additional reductions might impair safety, and that minimal reductions in the improvement requirements would not substantially reduce ROW improvement costs, staff finds that there is little to no potential for rev'~sing the grid street ROW improvement standards and recommends that they remain as currently detailed in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan and City Code Memo to FEDRAC November 20, 2002 Page 2 of 2 Community Renewal Plan and Tax-Increment Financing Staff originally recommended that study be made of the Community Renewal Act's provisions for funding public improvements, in particular its tax-increment financing provisions. After careful analysis of the provisions of the Act and discussion with parties involved in draft!ng its provisions during 2001, and in light of the City Council's stated desire to focus only on public improvements in its City Center redevelopment incentives, it became apparent that the tax-increment financing provisions of the Community Renewal Act provide no additional benefit over that which the City is allowed to do without utilizing the Act. Since the Act's provisions only allow the City portions of both sales and property tax increments within the renewal area to be captured and used to recoup public funding expenditures, and since the City can earmark any increase in tax revenue for any use it may be legally put to, staff recommends focusing on internal mechanisms for public improvement funding and not utilizing the Community Renewal Act for now. Two general options are available with the City's existing taxing and expenditure authority for funding public improvements: i) 2) fund improvements in tandem with desired redevelopment projects, with the anticipation that future increased property and sales tax revenues that will accrue to the City's General Fund will eventually reimburse the City for its expenditures, or fund improvements in tandem with desired redevelopment projects that demonstrate specific estimates of future sales and property tax increments over a specified time period (say, 10 years). This option would require detailed financial analysis of accompanying redevelopment projects and estimates of future tax revenues. However, this would permit the City to decide what level of funding to provide, based on those projections, a desired time horizon, and what level of eventual reimbursement the City desires (e.g., 50%, 100%, etc.). This option also most readily allows for the creation of a public improvement fund for which those tax increments could be specifically earmarked as a means of creating a revolving fund to help finance future improvements. Altho~ugh no accurate predictions can be made of the amount o~' increased tax revenue that a redevelopment project might generate, some idea can be garnered by looking at one of the City Center's moderately successful shopping centers - SeaTac Village. This shopping center currently yields approximately $220,000 per year in sales tax revenue and on the order of $15-20,000 per year in property tax revenue. If one of the other, th under-performing City Center blocks (for example the block bounded by S. 316 and S. 320th Streets and 23ra and future 21st Avenues South) were to be redeveloped with a mix of retail, office, lodging and/or residential uses, it is possible that somewhere on the order Memo to FEDRAC NOvember 20, 2002 Page 3 of 3 of $200,000 in incremental sales tax revenue and $20,000 in incremental property tax revenue could be generated. Improvement of the adjacent 21 st Avenue S. grid street would cost on the order of $2,000,000. City funding of, say, half of that improvement ($1,000,000) could, therefore, be recouped by incremental tax revenues within approximately 5 years. One-quarter funding ($500,000) could be recouped in about 2-1/2 years. Another option in creating a revolving fund could be to subtract from such future tax increments the approximately 3% rate of inflation in sales tax revenues that the City uses in budget projections so as to avoid any, minimal impact to general city tax revenues that are counted on for future General Fund balances. This would impact the tax revenue increment minimally and would not materially change the time period for recouping ROW improvement expenditures. City Funding of ROW Improvements Given the conclusion above that there is little to no potential for revising the grid street ROW improvement standards, the City Council may wish to consider the concept of funding/partially funding grid street ROW improvements as an incentive to accompany desired redevelopment within the City Center. Observations of local commercial developers have indicated that extensive ROW improvements, such as those that might be necessary in constructing a grid street might serve as financial obstacles to desired redevelopment of key City Center sites. Consequently, future potential developers might approach the City with inquiries as to whether the City would be willing to help reduce these financial obstacles by participating in the financing of such ROW improvements. Other cities have even gone so far as to finance these improvements in advance of development, as an incentive to attract desired redevelopment. In either case, it is preferable for the City Council to have discussed these issues in advance of any pressing developer-driven request and have a standing, agreed-upon policy for such potential financial participation. As discussed above, one approach would be for the City Council to earmark a certain amount of potential funding per biennium (e.g., $500,000) that could be called upon to help fund ROW improvements in partnership with desired private-sector development. Criteria could be formulated that would detail whether particular development schemes would merit such public participation. For example, such criteria could focus on mixed- use, m~ultistory developments that further the City Center vision of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, financial criteria could be included that require a demonstration, based on reasonable rates of retum, of what level of"gap" financing, up to a certain cap, would be necessary for a particular development project to go forward. Additional criteria could focus on the project's projected increase in City tax revenue that would be generated as a measure of determining how quickly and/or to what extent the City's investment could be recouped. Memo to FEDRAC November 20, 2002 Page 4 of 4 As discussed above, the City could specifically earmark incremental sales and property tax revenues coming from the redevelopment area to replenish this fund so that in the long term there would be monies available to help finance other public improvements in the City Center. City Participation in a Public Parking Structure Notwithstanding what appears to be a copious supply of parking on most of City Center sites, major redevelopment of these sites would most likely yield the need for some amount of structured parking to accommodate tenant requirements and/or demands. Structured parking is expensive (on the order of $15,000 per stall) and can constitute a real obstacle to desired redevelopment projects. Similar to the above discussion regarding right-of-way improvements, the City could choose to partially fund a parking structure, in exchange for unrestricted public use of a proportionate share of its park!ng spaces, as an incentive and/or assistance to a desired redevelopment plan/project. Three main options would be available for financing Such an investment: 1) 2) ) One-time and/or.General Fund capital funding, to be recouped through increased sales and property taxes over a specified period of time; Use of funds from the revolving fund for City Center public improvements, suggested above, to which increased sales and tax revenues would be specifically earmarked; or Issuance of bonds to be retired by the increased sales and property tax revenue. This option requires the greatest amount of financial scrutiny of a potential redevelopment project in order to be able to "bank" on the increased tax revenue over the specified period. An additional mechanism that should be considered would be to allow future developers to "buy back" the City-funded parking spaces to serve the parking requirements and/or demand for future development on or near the site of the parking structure. A developer could be offered two options: 1) to buy the corresponding parking stalls for their sole use, accessory to their development, to be paid for at full market rate, based on construction/management costs, or 2) to "buy" use rights to these spaces that would also continue to be available for general public parking in a shared-use arrangement: This option/would likely result in a cost to the developer of less than full market rate for these spaces. (It should be noted that the City of Auburn has employed exactly this mechanism, after having purchased an additional floor of parking atop the Sound Transit parking garage. They are now "selling" those stalls to new development projects to meet their parking requirements/needs.) Memo to FEDRAC November 20, 2002 Page 5 of 5 COMMITTEE ACTION: Staff recommends that the Committee indicate which of the following potential redevelopment tools should continue to be explored and developed by staff, with the expectation that draft ordinances, policies and/or procedures would be developed and presented back to FEDRAC: 1. Potential funding of public ROW improvements in conjunction with redevelopment projects, pursuant to one or more of the following options: a. With the expectation that future increases in City sales and property tax revenues resulting from the projects will indirectly compensate for these expenditures; b. With the future increases in City sales and property tax revenues resulting from the projects be specifically designated to replenish an ongoing, revolving fund to finance future public ROW improvements. This fund could be supplemented each biennium with additional funding or stand alone and be replenished solely by these incremental sales and property tax revenues. 2. Potential financial participation in a public parking structure, pursuant to one or more of the following options: a. One-time and/or General Fund capital funding, to be recouped through increased sales and property taxes over a specified period of time; b. Use of funds from the revolving fund for City Center public improvements, suggested above, to which increased sales and tax revenues would be specifically earmarked; or c. Issuance of bonds to be retired by the increased sales and property tax revenue. AI'PROVAI, BY ~/ .." ' '"'""': COIX'JMITTEE:/ '~ 'I~ J ~,.~___ '"i.::":':' i · ' '" ~ '~ommitt~ Member Committee Member ~ ' (. ;h hiSr&"Chah: ..... · MEETING DATE: October 15, 2002 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CITY CENTER REDEVELOPMENT TOOLS CATEGORY: X CONSENT RESOLUTION [] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS ORDINANCE PUBLIC HEARING OTHER BUDGET IMPACT: Amount BUdgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: ATTACHMENTS: Memo to Finance/Economic Development/Regional Affairs Committee, dated 8/22, Memo to Finance/Economic Development/Regional Affairs Committee, dated 9/30, SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Pursuant to direction from the July FEDRAC meeting, City staff have held internal working sessions, co research, and the City-Chamber Economic Development Committee cosponsored a SeaTac Mall/City Cz Redevelopment Brainstorming Session on 8/20/02, assisted by an urban redevelopment consultant. The FEDRAC and these activities has been to elucidate any and all tools/ideas available to the City to help f( desired redevelopment of City Center properties, including the SeaTac Mall. At the August 27, 2002 FEDRAC meeting, staff presented a memo (dated 8/22/02 and attached hereto) outlining potential redevelopment tools. Of that list of nine ideas/tools, the Committee chose five for rr detailed study and presentation back at the 9/30/02 FEDRAC meeting. Staff's memo dated 9/30/02 (att2 hereto) provides this more detailed study. Staff presented this memo and associated information to FEDRAC at its 9/30/02 meeting, and the Corm made the recommendations cited below. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On 9/30/02 the Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee approved the followi recommendations to City Council: 1. Forward to LUTC the SEPA Planned Action for the City Center Core on the area described by South and 324th Streets and Pacific Highway South and 23rd Avenue South, and include Ross Plaza and Hill,, development. 2. Forward the Housing Tax Exemption proposal back to City Council for a public hearing on the "resi~ targeted area," as required by RCW, followed by action on the designation of the "residential targeted a 02 02 ~ducted ,nter goal of ,ster ~riefly )re ched fittee ag 316th ;ide lential rea: and action on the corresponding code amendments. 3. Forward to LUTC the issue of further studying the potential for any modification to ROW improvement standards within the City Center Core, or specific areas therein, that could lessen this burden to developers, while still maintaining necessary ROW functionality. 4. After LUTC has made a determination regarding the ROW improvements outlined above, return the issue to FEDRAC to direct City staff to identify the potential incentives to redevelopment and conduct further study of the potential for funding/partially funding these requirements. 5. Direct City staffto study further the two approaches discussed above for potentially funding or partially funding a public parking garage in the City Center, including potential funding plans and implementation strategies, to be brought back to FEDRAC for discussion and potential action. 6. Direct staff to continue to study the potential for and legal ramifications of implementing a Community Renewal Plan and, barring serious legal obstacles; proceed with such a plan in tandem with the planning efforts associated with the SEPA Planned Action. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to adopt the recommendations of the Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee from September 30, 2002." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTI~'~ [] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION [] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only.) COUNCIL BILL # 1s~ reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # IoltsIoz- REVISED - 05/10/2001 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Date: To: Via: From: Subject: September 26, 2002 Finance, Econom~pment and Regional Affairs Committee David H. Mose/~'K~ Mhnager · Patrick Dohe~ty,~ uty DireCtor, Community Development SerVices City Center ReX-[[~v~iopment Tools BACKGROUND: Pursuant to direction from the August FEDRAC meeting, City staffhave more fully explored and researched five of the City Center redevelopment tools from the nine then presented for preliminary discussion. This memo provides more information and background on these five potential redevelopment tools, which include: SEPA Planned Action, Housing Tax Exemption, Modify Infrastructure Requirements/Build Infrastructure Improvements, Participate in Public Parking Garage, and use of a Community Renewal Plan. You will note that Some of these tools require further study or consideration before proceeding with impiementation, although preliminary steps forward can be made without fully committing to the use of any of these tools. A summary of the City Center Market Study is also included, as it provides a valuable source of contextual information in considering City Center redevelopment ideas and toolS. City Center Market Study Because so much of the ensuing discussion about the various redevelopment tools the City may be interested in centers on an understanding of the City's Comprehensive Plan vision for the City Center and its relation to the forecasted market forces, it is appropriate to provide a summary of the market study's general conclusionshere. The market study offered the following general conclusions: In general, the retail/service sector will continue to be the greatest source of new development and redevelopment in the City Center, with 533,600 additional square feet of space forecasted by 2020. The likelihood that office space will be developed in the City Center is weakened by the ample supply of land available for office development in the East and West Campus areas and their correspondingly lower land values. For this reason, only 228,600 additional square feet of office space is forecasted by 2020. Housing faces similar obstacles as does office development in that land values, driven by the predominant retail/service sector, are. generally too high for stand- Memo to FEDRAC September 26, 2002 Page 2 of 2 alone housing developments in the City Center. Nevertheless, there will be continued demand for housing throughout the City during the next 20 years and some of that housing will very likely be developed within the City Center. The consultants offered a forecast of up to 600 additional housing units (most likely in mixed-use developments) in the City Center by 2020. The lodging sector will continue to see an oversupply for the next several years, with demand outstripping forecasted supply only around 2010. After that time, Federal Way may see additional lodging development, especially given its central and accessible location, synergy with existing lodging facilities, and amateur sports-driven lodging demand. No specific number of hotel units was forecasted. Additionally, it should be noted that within each of the above-cited sectors, the market study includes a more detailed forecast break-down for 2005, 2010, 2015, as well as 2020. Lastly, the consultants stated in their presentation on 9/16/02 ~that the City should not be discouraged that their market-based conclusions fall short of our Comprehensive Plan's more aggressive vision for the City Center. In fact, it was stated that it is appropriate for a City to have a vision that reaches farther than what the unassisted market forces might naturally bring. The discrepancy simply points out where the City might need to provide more incentives or regulatory tools in order to achieve the desired level of redevelopment. SEPA Planned Action In 2000 the City Council approved the funding for the planning and environmental work associated with a SEPA Planned Action for the City Center. The City Center market study was undertaken as a means of assisting the City in determining what level of development should be planned for in the SEPA Planned Action. Now that the market study has been completed and presented to the Land Use and Transportation Committee, we may begin the scoping process for the proposed SEPA Planned Action. Several important decisions need to be made regarding the SEPA Planned Action in order to go forward. The following is a discussion of each of three principal areas of concern: 1. What area of the City Center to cover. While the City Center is comprised of both the Core and Frame zoning districts, a Planned Action for the entire City Center may be too massive an undertaking. Staff agrees with a suggestion offered by developer and consultant Darrell Vange at the 8/20/02 City Center ~ Redevelopment Brainstorming Session at the SeaTac Mall; i.e., that the City should focus its efforts in order to optimize its limited time, money and other resources. Consequently, staff recommends that the SEPA Planned Action be focused on the "core" of the City Center Core zone, com.1~rised of the SeaTac Mall site, as well as the two superblocks between 320 and 316 Streets and between Pacific Highway and 23ra Avenue. · How much development and of what types to cover. This will take more analysis, but in general, staff recommends that the plan for development exceed what the " 7.o Memo to FEDRAC September 26, 2002 Page 3 of 3 market might naturally bring without incentives or regulations. Depending on the timeframe chosen (below), we can consult the individual break-downs of forecasted development per sector in the market study, and decide how much further we would like to plan for. Staff recommends that one or two working sessions with area stakeholders be held to arrive at the scope of the planned action, both in quantity of development, as well as type of development. Regarding type of development, the planned action should include a full range of acceptable and appropriate development types, sizes and configurations to ensure flexibility. However, it should explicitly be crafted to apply only to planned-for development. That is to say, if the City envisions, say, mixed-use, multi-story or multi-use developments, then we would not offer the benefit of the planned action process to a one-story commercial strip center, for example. These (and/or other) uses would continue to be allowable and there would be no obstacle to them, but they should not be offered the "incentive" contemplated by the Planned Action. What time frame to cover. The only serious issue to consider regarding the desired time frame relates to the EIS. The longer the time frame of the environmental disclosure and identification mitigation measures, the more work (and money) involved in preparing the document. In addition, the modeling and forecasting associated with the traffic analyses and accompanying mitigation measures become more difficult. Staff recommends a time frame on the order of 10 years, with a planned update/remodeling at year 5. This does not mean that the EIS and Planned Action would expire after ten years, but that we would plan and analyze the impacts of a forecasted ten years' amount of redevelopment. If less growth occurs, the Planned Action/EIS would be valid for longer. Conversely, adding to the EIS would not be such a large undertaking as starting anew, but would require some new work at that time. Staff will be discussing the SEPA Planned Action and these issues with LUTC in the next few weeks. Housing Tax Exemption The limited property tax exemption for multifamily housing in the City Center is still Under consideration by the City Council. Earlier this month, the City Manager and staff concluded efforts conducted over the Summer to meet and discuss the proposal with the other taxing jurisdictions included in this action: Federal Way School District, King County Library and Federal Way Fire District. Key among these constituents' concerns was the potential demand for service during the period when the property would yield less tax revenue. Pursuant to staff research~ two key discoveries were made: Related to School District demands. Staff found that school-age children comprise on average only five percent o~f residents in new city-center multifamily buildings in other suburban downtowns (Renton, Bellevue), compared with much Memo to FEDRAC September 26, 2002 Page 4 of 4 higher percentages from older multifamily buildings in the neighborhoods. As a result, even with a partial tax exemption during the initial 1 O-year period, city center mixed-use/multifamily buildings would likely yield re:revenues per student of up to 20% greater than the per-student max revenue resulting from older multifamily buildings in the neighborhoods. This is due to the substantially lower student-per-unit ratio in these potential city center buildings and the max revenues coming in associated with the higher land values and value of the first-floor commercial space in mixed-use buildings. o Related to Fire District demands. Staff interviewed Fire Department personnel from Renton and Bellevue to ascertain the.level of demand for service for newer (under 10 years old) mixed-use and multifamily buildings in urban centers. Both empirical and anecdotal information yielded the conclusion that demand for fire and emergency medical services was noticeably lower for market-rate multifamily buildings in urban centers during the first ten years than for older buildings in the neighborhoods. These observations corroborate the premise that these new buildings, with higher rents and in more urbanized locations, draw more stable tenants, willing to pay top-of-the-market rents, such as young professionals/cguples or recent retirees - populations less prone to fire or medical emergency situations otherwise more frequently seen among lower-incbme populations or households with children, such as smoking- or space heater-related fires or medical- or accident-related emergencies associated with children. What's more, thes~ new buildings are of new construction with generally state-of- of-the-art wiring, plumbing, fire detection/suppression equipment, etc. In addition, input from area developers has been positive. Two developers remarked that the yearly savings (on the order of $70,000/year for a $7,000,000 project) constitute about 10% of a developer's desired yearly operating income of about $700,000 - a substantial incentive. In light of the above-cited city center market study conclusions that, given higher land costs, potential need for structured parking, and lower average rents, multifamily housing will be slow to come to the city center, incentives such as this will be needed to attract this type of development. Not to be ignored is also the fact that many of the surrounding communities have already enacted this provision (e.g., Tacoma, Kent, Renton, Seattle), and Federal Way should do what it can to remain competitive in the region. Failing to enact this provision may send a tacit message to the development community that this city is not interested in redeyelopment - clearly not the position the City has taken. To conclude, staff believes the benefits of the housing max exemption proposal substantially outweigh any perceived costs. The tax exemption proposal is slated to be brought back to the City Council for consideration this Fall, and staffwill offer further detailed support for its approval at that time. Because the November 6, 2001 public hearing regarding designation of the "residential targeted area," pursuant to RCW requirements, did not include sufficient public notice, the City Council must hold another Memo to FEDRAC September 26, 2002 Page 5 of 5 such hearing. However, after closing this additional hearing, the "residential targeted area" may be designated and the code provisions may be approved at that very same Council meeting, if the Council so wishes. Modify Infrastructure Requirements/Build Infrastructure Improvements As evinced from developers' comments over recent years, as well as mentioned at the 8/20/02 SeaTac Mall/City Center Redevelopment Brainstorming Session, right-of-way improvements can be a substantial burden for developers, especially in Federal Way's City Center, where new "grid streets" are required. Two approaches to reduce this burden were discussed: Modify Infrastructure Requirements. Under this approach, City staff (Public Works and Community Development) could do a more detailed study of the relationship between the codified right-of-way (ROW) improvement standards and every proposed grid street or other proposed ROW improvement, with the intent of finding any potential locations where the improvement standards can be lessened throughout the City Center for these proposed grid streets. Examples might be narrower overall ROW width, narrower roadway width, etc. Similarly, study could be made of the need for two-thirds ROW improvement when only one abutting property owner is making the improvement. This requirement shifts more burden on the one 'abutting property owner, with no certainty about late- corner's reimbursement. Or if, the full two-thirds improvement is truly necessary for circulation purposes, perhaps the City could fund the difference between the abutting property owner's half-ROW obligation and the two-thirds improvement (see below). Staff recommends that further study be made of the potential for any modification to ROW improvement standards that could lessen this burden to developers, while still maintaining necessary ROW functionality. City Build/Fund Infrastructure Improvements. Recognizing that incentives may be necessary to attract desired redevelopment, the City may find it beneficial to fund or contribute to the funding of selected ROW improvements. (See comments under Community Renewal Act for related discussion and additional funding options.) Two general approaches could be considered: Identify a focused redevelopment area and fund/partially fund key ROW improvements and/or missing links in that area as incentive to redevelopment; or Offer potential funding/Partial funding of ROW improvements associated with preidentified, desired redevelopment (especially in conjunction with community renewal plan, discussed below under Community Renewal AcO. Memo to FEDRAC September 26, 2002 Page 6 of 6 Staff recommends further study of these options, particularly associated with any potential work to implement a community renewal plan. Participate in Public Parking Garage Given that the supply of parking might become a serious obstacle to desired redevelopment of the Mall site (or likely other sites, as well), the requirement for some amount of structured parking will likely present itself.' Parking structures, however, are expensive, with current cost estimates running on the order of $12-15,000 per parking stall. Most developers in the Federal Way market would shy away fi.om redevelopment schemes that include the cost burden of a substantial amount of structured parking. Conversely, assisting in the financing of a parking garage has been characterized as the single best way of capacitating desired redevelopment of key sites, such as the SeaTac Mall. The City's participation in such an endeavor would necessarily have to result in public benefit and usage of at least a proportionate share of the parking spaces. But, given that most, if not all, users of such a facility would likely be visiting the associated redevelopment site, this should not be perceived as an obstacle by an associated develoPer. One interesting approach has been used in the City of Santa Monica. That City has financed and constructed public parking garages throughout its downtown and then exacted reimbursement on a p6r-stall basis fi.om developers according to their parking requirements and/or demand. This is feasible because on-site parking is not allowed in downtown Santa Monica, so the parking garages essentially becomethe off-site parking supply for individual establishments' throughout the downtown. A variation on this approach could be considered for Federal Way, wherein developers of future projects could "buy" use of parking spaces from the City within any publicly funded parking facility to capture all or part of their parking reqUirement/demand. A developer could be offered two options: 1) to buy the corresponding parking stalls for their sole use at full market-rate based on construction/management costs, or 2) to "buy" use rights to these spaces that also be available for general public parking in a shared-use arrangement for somewhat less than full market rate. Again, especially for a developer facing the prospect of constructing a parking structure in certain development scenarios, an alternative such as this could soften the blow of the costs of structured parking. There are essentially two approaches related to this redevelopment tool: 1) the City could build a parking garage to serve (a) key redevelopment site(s) with or without partial reimbursement as redevelopment occurs, or 2) the City, after careful legal analysis, may be able to offer financing/partial financing of a parking facility as a companion to targeted redevelopment projects, pursuant to a community renewal plan and/or SEPA Planned Action. Memo to FEDRAC September 26, 2002 Page 7 of 7 Staff recommends that both of these approaches be studied further, including potential funding plans and implementation strategies, to be brought back to FEDRAC for discussion and potential action. Community Renewal Plan Pursuant to RCW '35.81 (Community Renewal Act), a municipality may create a community renewal plan for areas it designated as "blighted." ManY criteria are listed as qualifying for "blighted," including "inapproPriate uses of land or buildings," "defective or inadequate street layout," and "faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility or usefulness." These three criteria seem particularly pertinent. With a Comprehensive Plan vision of a multi-use city center containing mid- and high- rise, mixed-use buildings housing commercial, residential and public/institutional uses, the current City Center land use pattern may somewhat easily been deemed "inappropriate." Approximately two-thirds of the land area is consumed by parking lots, and most of the remaining land dedicated to single-use, one-story buildings. In addition, there are substantial vacancies within the core of the City Center. Therefore, it seems quite feasible that the City could conclude that at least the core of the City Center Core zone (between 316th to 324th Streets and 23ra Ave and Pacific HighWay) exhibits "inappropriate uses of land or buildings" vis-h-vis our Comprehensive Plan vision. Similarly, this same area exhibits a pattern of very large superblocks and correspondingly large land parcels. While some communities may face hurdles in achieving desired redevelopment due to multiple property ownership of many small parcels, another hurdle can be excessively large parcels that can be difficult to sell to developers interested in smaller projects or who cannot finance the purchase of very large sites. For this reason, it may be possible to conclude that the City Center also exhibits "faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility or usefulness." Lastly, as detailed in the Comprehensive Plan, the City Center lacks sufficient improved roadways to alleviate traffic congestion, improve accessibility and visibility to abutting property and commercial establishments, and break down the superblocks to create a more pedestrian-friendly walking environment. It is for this reason that the Comprehensive Plan includes a layout of the potential future "grid" streets. Consequently, it is quite reasonable for the City to conclude that the City Center exhibits "defective or inadequate street layout." In short, although further study and consideration of these provisions are necessary, staff believes that at least the above-described corCofthe City Center Core zone may meet the definition of "blighted area," pursuant to the Community Renewal Act and should be considered for a community renewal plan. A community renewal plan, including public input and involvement pursuant to the RCW, would be a natural outgrowth of our Comprehensive Plan vision and could go Memo to FEDRAC September 26, 2002 Page 8 of 8 hand-in-hand with the planning efforts associated with the above-mentioned SEPA Planned Action. Once the community renewal plan is approved, the City may consider participating financially in improvements or projects that fulfill that plan. These projects can range from the above-cited ROW improvements or participation in a parking structure to direct financial participation or loans to projects to "develop, expand, or retain land uses that contribute to the success of the...plan," and "to provide incentives to property owners and tenants to encourage them to locate in the community reneWal .area." The Act calls out a preference for projects that "will create or retain jobs, a substantial portion'of which, as determined by the municipality, shall be for persons of low income." Given that the main ecOnomic engine of Federal Way's City Center are retail and service establishments, and future redevelopment projects will likely continue to build upon this sector, it is probable that most new jobs associated with redevelopment projects in the City Center may continue to be in the retail/service sector and would, therefore, meet this criterion. Lastly, a particularly attractive component of the community Renewal Act is that it includes a form of tax-increment financing for the community renewal area that includes both property and sales tax. In short, this mechanism directs any increment in tax revenues over the baseline year to a fund to pay back the City for any expenditures made pursuant to the plan. The inclusion of sales tax revenue is particularly helpful, given that so much of the City Center is retail/service based and generates a great deal of sales tax. In addition, sales tax revenues are not capped, as property tax revenues have been by recent initiatives. It should be noted that the Act allows for only the City portion to be captured unless other jurisdictions agree to participate with their corresponding portions, but this is still an important potential source of funds to help offset any expenditures the City .may make-in its endeavors to attract or accompany desired redevelopment. It should be noted that certain provisions of the Community Renewal Act deal with issues that previously have raised concerns over limitations imposed by our State Constitution. Use of these provisions would require careful legal analysis. Therefore, staff recommends that the City continue to explore the legal ramifications of using this key redevelopment tool and, barring serious legal obstacles, proceed with a community plan in tandem with the planning efforts associated with the SEPA Planned Action. Once the plan is done, the City Council can then deeide whether to adopt the plan p~suant to the Community Renewal Act. COMMITTEE ACTION: Staff recommends that the Committee: Memo to FEDRAC September 26, 2002 Page 9 of 9 o o Forward to LUTC it support for focusing the SEPA Planned Action for the City Center Core on the area described by South 316th and 324th Streets and Pacific Highway South and 23rd Avenue South. Forward the Housing Tax Exemption proposal back to City Council for a public hearing on the "residential targeted area," as required by RCW, followed, by action on the designation of the "residential targeted area" 'And action on the corresponding code amendments. DireCt City staff to conduct further of the potential for any modification to ROW improvement standards within City Center Core, or specific areas therein, that could lessen this burden to developers, while still maintaining necessary ROW functionality. Direct City staff to identify key ROW improvements and/or missing links as potential incentives to redevelopment and conduct further study of the potential for funding/partially funding these improvements. Direct City staff to study further the two approaches discussed above for potentially funding or partially funding a public parking garage in the City Center, including potential funding plans and implementation strategies, to be brought back to FEDRAC for discussion and potential action. Direct staff to continue to study the potential for and legal ramifications of implementing a Community Renewal P1an and, barring serious legal obstacles, proceed with a such a plan in tandem with the planning efforts associated with the SEPA Planned Action. API'ROVAI'~ BY COMMITTEE: Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member MEMORANDUM TO: FROI~I: RE: DATE: FEDRAC Members Patrick Doherty, Deputy Director, Community Development Services CITY CENTER REDEVELOPMENT IDEAS & 8/20 WORKSHOP August 22, 2002 Pursuant to direction from the July FEDRAC meeting, City staff have held internal working sessions, conducted research, and the City-Chamber Economic Development Committee cosponsored a SeaTac Mall/City Center Redevelopment Brainstorming Session on 8/20/02, assisted by an urban redevelopment .consultant. The goal of FEDRAC and these activities has been to elucidate any and all tools/ideas available to the City to help foster desired redevelopment of City Center properties, including the SeaTac Mall. Below is a list of ideas generated by staff, together with comments and responses (in italics) from both the urban development consultant and the attendees at the 8/20/02 Brainstorming Session. The list is complemented by an additional set of notes and comments about other issues. SEPA Planned Action. Under this approach the City does the ElS upfront for an anticipated level/mix of redevelopment (including alternatives), approves a "planned action," and thus allows applicants of anticipated development to get a substantially expedited permit without going through environmental or other appealable land use approvals. A great idea that developers would really welcome, as long as it includes flexibility, multiple 'development scenarios, and mitigation measures and costs identified up-front Housing tax exemption. If approved by City Council, would exempt new residential construction from City property tax for ten years. Could be a very attractive incentive to housing developers. Given the example of approximately $ 70, 000 in tax relief for a $ 7, 000, 000 residential project, that couM equal on the order of lO% of the desiredannual operating income of Memo to FEDRAC August 22, 2002 Page 2 of 2 approximately 10% ($700, 000) on the investment. This is a substantial figure that developers would respond to. o Waive development fees. Under this approach the City could waive development review fees for desired development types - ranging from land use to building permit fees. Given the relatively low cost of these fees vis-h-vis the total development costs, their benefit to the developer may not outweigh their cost to the City in person-hours. It also may raise equal protection questions. Although this idea has great "PR" value and could impress upon some developers and property owners that the City is committed to its objective to foster redevelopment of the City Center, the actual economic impact of waiving these fees is minimal. Land use and building fees typically are less than one-half of one percent of the overall construction budget. Waive mitigation fees. Under this approach the City could waive fees for mitigating certain development impacts, but this would likely only work if the City itself were intending to pay the mitigation fee and/or perform the mitigation of identified environmental impacts. As mentioned by the Brainstorming Session attendees, this, too, could raise equal protection issues. Waiving mitigation fees can have a more substantive impact on the development budget and be seen as a real incentive to most property owners/developers. It may, however, raise concerns within the community from other property owners/developers. Again, the mitigation would have to occur onq way or another, so with waiving the fees, the City may have to foot the bill. Waive utility taxes: The only tax that the City could waive in the City Center Core or other designated area would be the utility tax. This could serve as an incentive that developers could use to lure tenants - be that residential or commercial - which could, therefore, potentially affect developers' interest in City Center redevelopment opportunities. It was felt that this would not be a great inducement to most developers, unless they were specifically targeting potential tenants who are big users of utilities and might see that as an incentive to locate within a new development. 6. Reduce infrastructure requirements/Build infrastructure improvements. Under this approach the City could either reduce the design requirements for identified grid streets (e,g., narrow streets, allowing private drives to qualify, etc.) OR commit to constructing desired ROW improvements itself. This was seen as one of the most significant incentives that the City could offer. Developers typically respond quite enthusiastically to this kind of "partnering" with local municipalities. Given the not-insignificant burden that constructing Memo to FEDRAC August 22, 2002 Page 3 of 3 portions of the City Center grid street system might have on a particular development, this couM be a real bonus. Within the Mall property itself, the circular, internal "ring road, "contemplated in the Comprehensive Plan might be able to have lesser width/improvemen( requirements than normally required elsewhere in the City as a similar incentive. o Build public parking garage. Given that the supply of parking might become a serious obstacle to major redevelopment of the Mall site (or possibly other sites), the requirement for some amount of structured parking may present itself. If the City were to fund/contribute to such a parking facility, it would remove or lower that potential obstacle. Similar to the previous tool, the City's constructing or participating in the construction of a parking garage could be seen as a serious and attraCtive "partnering" tool by developers. Notwithstanding what appears to be a large amount of parking at the Mall, most of that parking is allocated to one tenant or another, and new buildings or substantial expansions would displace parking that would have to be replaced. Replacement wouM almost invariably have to come in the form of some structured parking. So, City participation in this endeavor would be not only a significant contribution but also could capacitate more ambitious redevelopment schemes. This idea was characterized as one of the best ways to help the economics of a project. There was a note of caution, however, in that parking garages require careful financial study in order to be successful. Some communities have succeeded with them and others have run into troubles. Landpurchase/assetnbly. Through direct purchase, the City could assemble, permit and/or supply infrastructure and ROW improvements to parcels that then could be specifically marketed to developers for desired development. This is what the Cities of Renton and Tukwila have done to attract redevelopment. Although other communities have done this and are doing this currently, land purchase and assembly can be difficult, especially if there are multiple property owners and/or existing lease obligations. Of course, that is precisely the burden that a municipality may be attempting topee potential developers from - as an inducement. In a focused community redevelopment effort, this can be a very successful tool (see comments below about "focusing efforts. ') Loans and/or other financial assistance (through community renewal plan). Given Washington State constitutional restrictions, the City cannot simply give public money over to a private project, unless said project area meets the criteria for a community renewal area and a community renewal plan is implemented (RCW 35.81). Many criteria are listed, including "inappropriate uses of land or buildings" and "defective or inadequate street layout" that could apply to the Mall and City Center Core properties. Down-side is that this is a new, untested provision and we would have to work hard to create a squeaky-clean record. Memo to FEDRAC August 22, 2002 Page 4 of 4 Note on Community Renewalprovision: This tool also allows a type of tax- increment financing wherein the city's increment of property tax and sales tax within the community renewal plan area may be used to retire any bonds used to finance infrastructure or specific redevelopment projects. Other jurisdictions may contribute their portion, but would be unlikely to do so unless they see a benefit. One potential way King County might see a benefit and might, therefore, attract a portion of their sales tax increment would be to document that a new, redeveloped mall/city center would cater to some portion of our residents who now shop in Pierce County/Tacoma Mall, etc. With the right public process, planning and focus, a community renewal plan can be very successful, especially if it can access/leverage some tax increment financing tools. This new legislation should be seriously cOnsidered, especially if the City is interested in performing any of the right-of-way improvements or participate in constructing a parking garage. Other Comments/Ideas: The consultant opined that Federal Way's demographics and location are strong and should provide a more successful mall/retail store. The combination of the demographics, location and size of the Mall allows for a greater potential, especially if structured parking is included. The consultant noted that a successful city center requires a mixture of uses, not just retail. He indicated that housing is truly a key to an active city center because housing places people, with wallets, on the streets during all hours. Additionally, the added population increases safety as more "eyes on the street" are available. The consultant also mentioned that the City should remember that it is a real estate developer. City facilities can substantially impact the city center, regardless of the type of structure (i.e. city hall, community center, performing arts facility, sports facility, etc.). He shared the dilemma Port Angeles is currently facing of having moved city facilities to a site outside'the downtown area, which is now experiencing a reduction in business. As a result, Port Angeles is analyzing what is necessary to emczo~ urage/help development in the downtown area. Because of limited public ffinds and planning/public process capacity, the City may want to consider adjusting the initial efforts to achieve City Center redevelopment by focusing on smaller, more manageable subareas within the City Center. For example, focus efforts for residential development on areas where residential development is most likely to occur. The consultant suggested the "northern" frame area with potential because there housing already exists and because it is an area with nice views. An example of commercial redevelopment could focus on the "quadrant" around the pr~o~osed Sound Transit facility, the Mall and/or Mall and properties north of 320 . The City could do a block-by- block analysis of potential areas Memo to FEDRAC August 22, 2002 Page 5 of 5 · The community should not perceive that the SeaTac Mall should be in competition with Southcenter or Tacoma Mall, It isn't. It should find its own market niche and cater to that. The Mall representatives, said it could be further developed.as a "lifestyle center," such as University Village. · The preliminary proposal being worked on by'staff to require housing or office or multistory development together with,large commercial developments should be sure to include flexibility. Housing atop certain big-box retailers may not be feasible, while housing atop other types of commercial may work. Perhaps the code provision ought to include an option that allows housing elsewhere on site. · The consultant mentioned that, above all, a developer is looking for predictability, consistency, timeliness, stability and "no surprises" in the permitting system. This can go even further than some smaller financial incentives (such as waiving permit fees) in partnering with developers. · Attendees brought up the related notions that interpretation of zoning provisions needs to be consistent, as well as the idea that perhaps a permit coordinator or problem-resolution coordinator could exist within Community Development. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: September 23, 2003 Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee Patricia A. ~~ City Attorney David H. Mosel~?(~it~y ~anager Code Amendment Updating Chapter 9, Licenses and Business Registration. Backqround: Under RCW 35.21.692, the Washington State Legislature has preempted the City's ability to regulate message practitioners. The proposed amendment to Chapter 9, Article IX reflects the changes in state law. The modifications are necessary to ensure consistent enforcement of the laws. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Finance, Economic Development, and Regional Affairs Committee approve the proposed amendments to Chapter 9, Article IX of the Federal Way City Code and forward to full Council for consideration at the October 21,2003, City Council meeting. APPROVAL BY COMMITTEE: Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member K:\agnditem\fedrac\massage practitioners.2003 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTIONS OF ARTICLE IX TO CHAPTER 9 OF THE FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE REGARDING MASSAGE PRACTITIONERS (AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 95-229). WHEREAS, regulation of massage businesses is necessary to preven activities that are detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, and the general welfare o the citizens of the City of Federal Way, and WHEREAS, regulation of massage businesses is necessary to reduc( significant criminal activity, including prostitution and breaches of the peace, that hav( historically and regularly occurred in the massage business, and, WHEREAS, the Washington State Board of Massage now regulate,. massage practitioners, WHEREAS, the State Legislature has determined under RCW 35.21.69: that a state licensed massage practitioner will not be subject to additional licensim requirements not currently imposed on similar health care providers, such as physic~ therapists or occupational therapists, and, WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council has determined it is in the bes interest of the public to revise the Federal Way City Code in regards to messag~ practitioners for consistent enforcement of state laws, and, WHEREAS the Federal Way City Code needs to comply with the revisions t~ ORD # , PAGE 1 the state law regarding massage practitioners, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Amendment. Chapter 9, Article IX, Section 9-472 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended as follows: 9-472 License for massage practitioners. It is unlawful for any person to perform a massage or represent himself or herself as a massage practitioner without f;-"* ~,~,,,,~,,~,*;*; .... ,,~,,~; ....... ,,,~ being in possession of a current, valid Washington State massage practitioner's license. (Ord. No. 95-229, ~ 1, 3-21-95) SECTION 2. Amendment. Chapter 9, Adicle IX, Section 9~75 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended as follows: 9~75 License fees. (a) Amount of fee. Applicants granted a license under this chapter shall pay to the city the following fees prior to the issuance of their license: Massage Business $15.00 per year ~ass~ge ~n~ger $J5.00 per year Annual Renewal Fee SJ 6.00 per year ~ss~fle Pr~ctJtioner (not employee of reflJstere~ m~ss~qe business): flener~l business ORD # ., PAGE 2 license requirements of Chapter 9, Article II app!y. (b) Late penalty. A late penalty shall be charged on all applications for renewal of a license received later than seven working days after the expiration date of such license. The amount of such penalty is fixed as follows: Days Past Due Additional Percentage of License Fees 8 - 30 25% 31 - 60 50% 61 and over 100% (Ord. No. 95-229, § 1,3-21-95) SECTION 3. Amendment. Chapter 9, Article IX, Section 9-476 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended as follows: 9-476 License applications. (a) Massage business. All applications for a massage business license or license renewal shall be submitted in the name of the person or entity proposing to conduct such massage business on the business premises, shall be signed by such person or his or her legally authorized agent, and notarized or certified as true under penalty of perjury. All applications shall be submitted on a form supplied by the city clerk, which shall require the following information: (1) The name, residence address, residence telephone number, date and place of birth driver's license number, and Social Security number of the applicant if the applicant is ORD # , PAGE 3 an individual or tax identification number if the applicant is a corporation or other entity; (2) The business name, address and telephone number of the establishment; (3) The names, addresses, telephone numbers and social security numbers of any partners, corporate officers, or shareholders who own 10 percent or more of the business, or other persons who have a substantial interest or management responsibilities in connection with the business, specifying the interest or management responsibility of each. For the purpose of this subsection "substantial interest" shall mean ownership of 10 percent or more of the business, or any other kind of contribution to the business of the same or greater size; (4) The name of the landlord or property owner of the property on which the business is situated. ORD # , PAGE 4 nhnfnnr~nh and d~f~ nf hiffh- nr c, A current (~h) Massage manager. All applications for a massage manager's license or license ronewal shall bo si~ned by tho applicant and notadzod or ce~ifiod to be truo undor ponalty of pedu~. All applications shall bo submi~od on a form suppliod by the city clork, which shall roquim, at a minimum, tho followin~ information: (~) lhe applicant's name, residence address, residence telephone number, date and ORD # , PAGE 5 place of birth, driver's license number and social security number; (2) A letter, dated no more than 30 days prior to the date of the submission of the application, from the owner of the business indicating intent to employ the applicant on a specified date; (3) Written proof that the applicant is 18 years of age or older as provided for in subsection (b)(3) of this section; (4) The mailing address and street address of all places within the city of Federal Way at which the massage manager will provide services. The massage manager shall notify the city clerk, in writing, of any changes in, or additions to, the location of such services within 14 days of any such change or addition. (~_c) Background checks. All applications submitted pursuant to this chapter will be submitted to a background check in accordance with the procedures of the Federal Way police department. (Ord. No. 95-229, § 1, 3-21-95) SECTION 4. Amendment. Chapter 9, Article IX, Section 9-477 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended as follows: 9-477 Standards for denial of application for license. (a) Massage business license. The city clerk may deny any massage business license request if he or she determines that the applicant has: (1) Made any material misstatement in the application for a license; (2) Proposed a place of business or operates a business which fails to comply with all applicable requirements of this Code including without limitation the zoning, building, ORD # , PAGE 6 health and fire codes and all other applicable local, state, or federal laws, rules or regulations; (3) Had any convictions which have a direct connection with the licensed activity including, but not limited to, theft, prostitution, promotion or permitting prostitution, sexual offenses, consumer fraud, massage practitioner or massage manager violation, or obscenity within five years prior to the date of such application; or (4) Had a massage business license denied, revoked or suspended by the city, or any other jurisdiction within five years prior to the date of such application. ......... ~ ................. ~,~_. ...... ~_ ......... ~ .......... ~ ........................ ORD # , PAGE 7 !~,O~^l 'i'itln I ~ ae nn~.Ai nvletinn nr hnr~affnr amnndn4 ~A~hlr-h li~-nn~z~ (6b) Massage manager license. The city clerk may deny any massage mnnager license applied for under the provisions of this chapter if the city clerk determines that the applicant has: (1} Made any mnterial misstatement in the application for n license: or (2) Had any convictions which have a direct connection with the licensed activity including, but not limited to, theft, prostitution, sexunl offense, consumer fraud, mnssage practitioner or manager violntion, or obscenity, within five yenrs prior to the dnte of (3) Had n massnge practitioner or massage manager license denied, revoked or suspended by the city or nny other jurisdiction within five years prior to the dnte of nppliaation: or (4) Had a Washington State mnssage practitioner's license suspended or revoked which had been issued pursuant to Chapter 18.108 ROW, ns now existing or hereafter amended or had any professional license revoked which hnd been issued pursuant to P, OW Title 18, ns now existing or hereafter amended, which license nuthorized performing massage treatments. (al_o} Effect of license denial. If any applicnnt has a license denied bnsed upon a conviction clnssified as a felony, or any other nonfelony convictions, pursuant to this ORD # , PAGE 8 section, a license shall not be granted within five years from the date of such denial. If any applicant has a license denied for any other reason, a license shall not be granted within three years from the date of such denial. (Ord. No. 95-229, § 1,3-21-95) SECTION 5. Amendment. Chapter 9, Article IX, Section 9-478 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended as follows: 9-478 Standards for suspension or revocation of license. (a) Massage business license. The city clerk may revoke or suspend a massage business liCense if he or she determines that the licensee has: (1) Failed to comply with FWCC 9-501,9-502 or any of the other requirements of this chapter; or (2) Failed to comply with the applicable building, health, fire and/or zoning code provisions or with any other applicable federal, state or local laws, rules or regulations; or (3) With knowledge employed persons who, within a period of the preceding five years have been convicted of prostitution or consumer fraud stemming from activities conducted on the licensed premises, or who have been arrested for such offenses and which lead to such convictions; (4) Had any convictions which have a direct connection with the licensed activity, including but not limited to, consumer fraud, theft, controlled substances, prostitution, permitting or promoting prostitution, sexual offenses, or obscenity; or (5) Failed to comply with or done anything which constitutes a basis for denying a ORD # ., PAGE 9 license application. (b) Notice of violation. If the city clerk, the building official, or his or her agent determines during an inspection that the condition of any massage business needs correction, a written notice of violation shall be issued to the supervisor, manager, owner, or person in charge specifying such violations. Those same violations shall be remedied within 48 hours unless a later date is determined by the city clerk. Failure to comply with any written notice of violation to make corrections may result in suspension or revocation of the massage business license. V~ ~1 ~1 I] ~1 I~ ~1 l~l .V~I/~llI~I l~ VI I~1 ~ or /2~ D~;In4 fn ~nmnh~ ~;fh nr 4nnn an~4h;nn ~*;hi~h ~nn~fif~fn~ ha~;~ fnr 4nn~inn (~) ~a~age manager license. T~e cit~ cler~ ma~ ~u~pen~ or revoke an~ massage manager license if ~e or s~e ~etermine~ lhat t~e licensee (1) Faile~ to compl~ with any of l~e operating requirement~ ~et fo~h in F~GC g-501 an~ g-502 or faile~ to compl~ wit~ an~ of t~e ot~er requirements of t~is c~apter; or ORD # , PAGE 10 (2) Had any convictions which have a direct connection with the licensed activity including, but not limited to, theft, prostitution, consumer fraud, obscenity, or sexual offenses; or (3) Failed to comply with or done anything which constitutes a basis for denying a license. (ed_) Effect of license revocation. If any applicant under this chapter has his or her license revoked, a license shall not be granted under this chapter for a period of at leas' five years from the date of such revocation. (re) Duration of license suspension. The city clerk may suspend a license for no more than six months. (Ord. No. 95-229, § 1,3-21-95) SECTION 6. Amendment. Chapter 9, Article IX, Section 9-479 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended as follows: 9-479 Transfer of licenses and change of location. (a) Massage business. No massage business license issued under this chapter shall be transferable from one person or entity to another person or entity. Upon the sale or transfer of an interest greater than 50 percent in a massage business, a license shall become null and void. A new application shall be made by any person desiring to operate or maintain the establishment and shall include a release of interest statement from the previous licensee and a signed lease or rental agreement for the establishment. ORD # , PAGE 11 SECTION 7. Amendment. Chapter 9, Article IX, Section 9-502 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended as follows: 9-502 Standards of conduct/operation. (a) Owner/manager requirements. The following standards of conduct and operation shall be adhered to by the owner, proprietor, manager, or person in charge of any massage business: (1) Any person who is employed to give a massage must be at least 18 years of age and be validly licensed as a massage practitioner pursuant to ,~,~o., ,,....~,o,.,.,, ,,-,~.-., .... ,~, ,,.,4 state law. (2) At all times during the hours a massage business is open for business, and/or during the presence of patrons, at least one validly licensed massage practitioner must be on the premises. ORD # , PAGE 12 (3) Any person who is employed by a massage business must present documentation that he or she has attained the age of 18 years when an inspection pursuant to this chapter is conducted. Proper documentation shall be as described in FWCC 9- 476(b)(3). (4) Provide that all doors in such premises, excluding doors in the office and storage rooms, unless such doors provide access to service areas, are so equipped that they may not be fastened shut so as to prevent reasonable access by such authorities who announce their authority to enter prior to inspection. (b) All licenses. The following standards of conduct and operation shall be adhered to by all licensees: (1) All licensees shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, including all safety and sanitation requirements and the city's building, fire and zoning codes; (2) All licensees shall allow any police officer, the city manager or his or her designee, or a representative from the Seattle-King County health department or the Federal Way fire department entry to the premises during the hours the massage business is open for business, upon presentation of proper identification, for purposes of inspecting the premises; (3) Maintain business receipts showing the date of service(s) given, the type of service(s) rendered and the name and city license number of the employee rendering the service(s). These business receipts shall be retained for a period of three years after the date of the service(s), and shall be open to inspection by the city clerk and the ORD # , PAGE 13 Federal Way police department; m,'~inf,'~in in nnnrl efnnrtinn o r,~ ~rrnnf %AI,"ac',hinn'l'nn C~f,-~fn m,'~oo,'~rnn nr,~r, flflnnz~r'o llr-exnez~- (o54_) Post in a prominent place a list of all services offered with a brief description of what the service entails along with the costs of such service(s). All business transactions with the customers must be conducted in accordance with the said posted list; (6_5) Not distribute or consume any alcoholic beverages and/or controlled substances on licensed premises; and (7-6) Not allow any unlicensed massage. (c) Minors. It shall be unlawful for the owner, manager, or any massage practitioner, or any employee or agent to admit anyone under the age of 18 years of age and permit them to remain in or about such premises, unless such person is accompanied by or presents the written consent of his or her parent or legal guardian. (d) Prostitution. It shall be unlawful for any owner, manager, massage practitioner, or any employee or agent to knowingly harbor, admit, receive or permit to be or remain in or about such premises any prostitute or any person under the influence of any narcotic or dangerous drug or to perform or allow to be performed any act, massage or manipulation in which contact is made with another's genital areas either by hand, body or by any mechanical device or object, whether it is covered or uncovered, clothed or unclothed, in whole or in part. ORD # , PAGE 14 (e) Clothing required. It shall be unlawful for any owner, manager, massage practitioner or any employee or agent to disrobe or be partially disrobed in the presence of another while in any facility defined in this chapter. (f) Supervision - Inspection. The owner or manager shall have the premises supervised at all times when open for business. Rooms and stalls used for the purpose of massage shall be constructed in such a manner as to permit inspection. (Ord. No. 95-229, § 1, 3- 21-95) SECTION 8. Severabilit¥. The provisions of this ordinance are declare¢ separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision section, or portion of this ordinance or the invalidity of the application thereof to any persor or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. SECTION 9. Ratification. Any and all acts consistent with the authority an{ prior to the effective date of this ordinance are hereby ratified and affirmed. SECTION 10. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from its passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this ,2003. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY day o ORD # , PAGE 15 MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. ORD # , PAGE 16 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: September 23, 2003 Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee Patricia A. Richardson, City Attorney ' ~.~.~ ~Jcdh aH~ i nMi'~~~p o ii cle~ Revisr~er ~,- Background: In 1992, the Federal Way City Council adopted Purchasing Policies. The policies set forth the dollar amounts allowed by state law for purchasing procedures such as the small works roster, competitive bidding, and recycling procurement. Subsequently, the State Legislature has modified the state laws regarding public contracts. Most notably, the threshold dollar amounts for small works roster and competitive bidding have increased. In order to be more efficient and timely with changes in state law, the proposed amendments to the Purchasing Policies incorporate the state law by reference, including all future amendments, additions and deletions. By incorporating the state laws, as Council has previously done with the Criminal Code in Chapter 6, Council will not need to review and adopt all recent state law modifications at the end of each Legislative Session. The proposed amendments also reorganize the Purchasing Policies. The attached chad shows the corresponding state law, and the proposed amendments. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Finance, Economic Development, and Regional Affairs Committee approve the proposed amendments to the Purchasing Policies and forward to full Council for consideration at the October 7, 2003, City Council meeting. APPROVAL BY COMMITTEE: Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member K:\agnditem\fedrac\purchasing policies.2003 II Definition of Public' Work Prdfessional Service .. COntracts 39.04.010 35A.40.210 35.22.62Q.(,;1) 23 Cooperative Purchasing 39.34 . '~!7' :r''. ' equ~ment.(ve~16f list) Sole source'.': 3~.A.40.210. ,, 19 '' (exception) .. 39.04,280(1)-{3) Bid solic!tation records ' . ;11 ~ ':. Public work - 35.A.40.210 11 publication requirement 35.22.620(2) 39.04.020 Public work - bid limits 35.A.40.210 10 35.22.620(3) 35A.40.210 10 : 35.22.620(2) Public work - work by city employees Bonds and bid security 26 39.08.010 39.08.030 Award or rejection of 11 bids : Determining lowest 43.19.1911 12 responsible bidder Administrative ' 22 Procedures CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PURCHASING POLICIES Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Section 8. Section 9. Section 10. Section 11. Section 12. Section 13. Section 14. Section 15. Section 16. Section 17. Section 18. Section 19. Section 20. Section 21. Section 22. Section 23. Section 24. Section 25. Section 26. Section 27. GENERAL PROVISIONS Purpose. Application. Federal funds. Grants. Professional service contracts. Responsibility for purchasing. Authority to execute. Routine expenses. Recycling procurement policy. COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS Bid limits. Competitive bidding. General standards for determining lowest responsible bidder. Cancellation of requests for bids or requests for proposals. Specifications. City procurement records. Unauthorized purchases. EXCEPTIONS TO COMPETITIVE BIDDING REQUIREMENT Cooperative purchasing. Emergency procurement. Other exemptions. MATERIALS, SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT Small purchases. Inspection and testing. Purchases for special events. PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS Definition of public works. Plans and specifications - Estimates - Publication - Emergencies. Small works roster. Bonds and bid security - Noncollnsion affidavit -- Insurance. Administrative procedures. GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to protect and advance the public interest by providing for the fair and equitable treatment of all persons involved in the purchasing process, by maximizing the purchasing value of public funds, by providing safeguards for maintaining a purchasing system of quality and integrity, and by following state law. Section 2. Application. This chapter applies to the award of contracts by the City for (1) purchases of materials, supplies, and equipment;(2) public works and improvements; and (3) non-professional services. This chapter does not apply to (1) the reimbursement of business expenses incurred by employees as governed by Ordinance No. 90-25 as now or hereafter amended; (2) purchase and/or lease of real estate; (3) lease agreements for materials, supplies and equipment unless the agreement is in excess of twenty thousand dollars or for more than three (3) years duration; and (4) professional and non-professional service contracts as defined in Section 5. Section 3. Federal Funds. When a purchase involves the expenditure of federal funds, conducted in accordance with any applicable federal law or regulation. purchasing shall be Section 4. Grants. Nothing in this chapter shall prevent thc city from complying with conditions of any grant, gift or bequest which is otherwise consistent with law. the terms and Section 5. Professional service contracts. Professional services, including contracts for architectural, engineering, legal and consulting services, are not subject to the requirements of this chapter. Contracts for architectural and engineering services shall be awarded in accordance with Chapter 39.80 RCW. For purposes of this section, "professional services" are those services involving labor, skill, education and special knowledge and where the labor and skill involved is predominately mental or intellectual rather than physical or manual. Section 6. Responsibility for purchasing. A. General. The director of finance or designee shall be responsible for all city purchasing~ under this resolution except where otherwise provided. The director or designee shall be head o4 the purchasing division of the fi,~ance department and shall administer the purchasing policie~ (hereinafter "Purchasing Policies ). / 1 B. Duties. In accordance with the Purchasing Policies, the director of finance or designee shall: (1) Purchase or supervise the purchase of all materials, supplies, equipment and nonprofessional services and award of all public works and improvement contracts by the city; (2) Sell, trade or otherwise dispose of surplus personal property belonging to the city. The city manager shall be responsible for the disposal of real property; (3) Establish and maintain programs for specifications development, contract administration and inspection and acceptance, in cooperation with the city departments using the items purchased; (4) Propose operational procedures consistent with the Purchasing Policies relating to the execution of his/her duties. Such procedures shall be followed by all city departments. These operational procedures are subject to prior approval of the city manager. The city manager may amend the procedures as he or she deems appropriate; and (5) Determine liability and property damage insurance requirements, including but not limited to coverage requirements, limits of liability, necessary endorsements and other matters relating to insurance, for any contract entered into by the city under this chapter. Section 7. Authority to execute. Every contract under the Purchasing Policies where the annual cost to the city or the annual revenue to be received by the city for such contracts is: A. Twenty thousand dollars or less, the city manager or his/her designee is authorized to sign such contracts on behalf of the city; B. More than twenty thousand dollars, approval of the city council is required for such contracts. Section 8. Routine expenses. Routine expenses such as utilities charges, claims and judgments, witness fees, governmental taxes and governmental fees for licenses and permits may be acquired, ordered or paid in the best interests of the City within budget appropriations or other council authorization therefor. Section 9. Recycling procurement policy. A. Intent. In accordance with RCW 35A.40.210, 35.22.620(10) and 39.30.40 including all future amendments, additions and deletion, the City of Federal Way finds it desirable to adopt a procurement policy promoting the use of recycled products and recyclable products by the City of Federal Way departments, thereby stimulating the demand for these products and helping to develop markets for materials that have been diverted from the solid waste stream. B. Use of recycled Materials. All City of Federal Way departments shall use recycled products and recyclable products whenever practicable and reasonable. C. Duty of the Director of Finance or Designee. The director of finance or designee shall establish and maintain a list of recycled and recyclable products that are available to be purchased by departments whenever practicable. COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS Section 10. Bid Limits. The competitive bidding process outlined in Section 11 is required whenever the estimated cost of a purchase of materials, supplies and equipment, or a contract for public work or improvement (including the cost of materials, supplies, equipment and labor), will exceed the sums as set forth in RCW 35A.40.210 and 35.22.620(3) including all future amendments, additions and deletions. Whenever the estimated cost of the materials, supplies and equipment is less than the bid limit as stated above, purchases shall be made in a manner authorized by Section 24 (small purchases). Whenever the estimated cost of the public work or improvement is less than the bid limit as stated above a contract for the public work or improvement shall be awarded in the manner authorized by Section 21 (small works roster). The public work or improvement may be performed by city employees within the limits and to the extent authorized by state law. Section 11. Competitive bidding. A. General. Any purchase of material, supplies, and equipment, or any contract for public works or improvements where the cost thereof exceeds the bid limit in Section 10 shall be by competitive bidding in accordance with RCW 35A.40.210 and 35.22.620(6) including all future amendments, additions and deletions, except for purchases and contracts made pursuant to Sections 17 (cooperative purchasing), 18 (emergency) and 19 (sole source). B. Request for Bids. A request for bids shall be issued which shall include the specifications and the contractual terms and conditions applicable to the procurement. C. Public Notice. Public notice of the request for bids shall be given not less than fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the date set forth therein for the opening of bids unless another timeline is deemed necessary by the director of finance or designee. Such notice shall be published, at least once each week for two (2) consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation. The public notice shall state the date and time of bid opening. Bids not received by the date and time stated for bid opening will not be accepted or considered. D. Bid Opening. Bids shall be submitted sealed to the office of the director of finance or as otherwise specified at any time within regular business hours and shall be identified as bids or the envelope. Bids shall be opened in public by the director of finance or designee at the tim~ and place stated in the request for bids. The amount of each bid, and such other relevan~ information as the director of finance or designee deems appropriate, together with the name o: each bidder, shall be announced and recorded. The record and each bid shall be open to public inspection. The director of finance or designee shall tabulate the bids and submit them to thc concerned department, which will make appropriate recommendations to the city manager. E. Bid Evaluation. Bids shall be evaluated based on the specifications and other relevan evaluation criteria set forth in the bid specifications. The evaluation criteria shall be objectivel~ measurable whenever possible, and may include such factors as discounts, transportation costs, and total or life cycle costs, inspection or testing which has been done of the product bid, quality, workmanship, delivery time, and suitability for a particular purpose. F. Bid irregularities. Except where otherwise provided in these Purchasing Policies, bids containing irregularities will be accepted by the city for consideration. Any action concerning the bid(s) containing irregularities shall be at the discretion of the city manager and/or city council in accordance with the provisions of law. The call for bids for all bids shall state the reserved right of the city to reject any and all bids and to waive irregularities in any provided that no bidder shall be permitted to gain unfair advantage over other bidders by action of the city council pertaining to this section. G. Correction or withdrawal of errors; Cancellation of Awards. Correction or withdrawal of inadvertent errors in bids before or after bid opening, or cancellation of awards or contracts based on such bid mistakes, may be permitted by the city to the extent allowed by law. Mistakes discovered before bid opening may be modified or the bid may be withdrawn by written or telegraphic notice received in the office designated in the request for bids prior to the time set for opening. After bid opening, corrections in or withdrawal of bids shall be permitted only to the extent that the bidder can show by clear and convincing evidence that a mistake was made, the nature of the mistake, and the bid price actually intended. All decisions to permit the correction or withdrawal of bids after bid opening, or to cancel awards or contracts based on bid mistakes, will be made by the city manager. H. Award or rejection of bids. The recommended bids over twenty thousand dollars shall be submitted to the city council by the city manager. The city council may award the bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder in accordance with Section 12, or may reject all bids in its sole discretion. The contract shall be considered and/or awarded to the lowest responsible bidder whose bid meets the specifications and evaluation criteria set forth in the request for bids. I. Recalling for bids. The city council may reject any or all bids and/or call for further bids. If no responsive, responsible bid is received on the first call, the city may readvertise and make a second call, or may enter into a contract without any further call. Section 12. General standards for determining lowest responsible bidder. In accordance with RCW 43.19.1911 including all future amendments, additions and deletions to determine the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in addition to price, thc following may be considered: A. The ability, capacity and skill of the bidder to perform thc contract; B. Whether the bidder can perform thc contract promptly, or within the time specified, without delay or interference; C. The reputation, experience and efficiency of the bidder; D. Thc quality of performance of previous contracts by the bidder; E. The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws and ordinances relating to contracts or services; F. The sufficiency of the financial resources and ability of the bidder to perform the contract; G. The ability of the bidder to provide future maintenance and service for the use of the subject of the contract; H. The number and scope of conditions attached to the bid. Section 13. Cancellation of requests for bids or requests for proposals. In accordance with RCW 43.19.1911 including all future amendments, additions and deletions a request for bids may be canceled in the discretion of the director of finance or designee. Thc masons therefor shall be made part of thc contract file. Each request for bids issued by the city shall state that the request may be canceled. Notice of cancellation shall be sent to all parties that have been provided with a copy of the request. The notice shall identify the request for bids and state briefly the reasons for cancellation. Section 14. Specifications. A. Maximum Practicable Competition. All specifications shall be drafted so as to promote overall economy for the purposes intended and encourage maximum free and open competition in satisfying the city's needs. The policy enunciated in this section applies to all specifications including but not limited to those prepared for the city by architects, engineers, designers, and drafters. B. "Brand Name or Equivalent" Specification. Brand name or equivalent specifications may be used when the director of finance or designee determines that use of a brand name or equivalent specification is in the city's best interest. C. Brand Name Specification. Because use of a brand name specification is often restrictive of competition, it may be used only when the director of finance or designee makes a written determination that only the identified brand name item or items will satisfy the city's needs. D. Experience Clause Restrictions. Experience clauses requiring prospective bidders to have a record of satisfactory operation or performance may only be used if such requirements have been adequately justified in writing and approved by the director of finance or designee. Section 15. City procurement records. A. Contract File. All determinations and other written records pertaining to the request to bid, award, or performance of a contract shall be maintained for the city in a contract file by the director of finance or designee and/or city clerk. B. Retention of Procurement Records. All procurement records shall be retained and disposed of by the city in accordance with state law and city ordinances, regulations and guidelines. If a contract is being funded in whole or in part by assistance from a federal agency, then all procurement records pertaining to that contract shall be maintained in accordance with any applicable requirements of federal law. Section 16. Unauthorized purchases. Except as provided in these Purchasing Policies and except as authorized by operational procedures adopted by the finance director or designee, no city employee shall make an' purchase or contract within the purview of these Purchasing Policies other than through the director of finance or designee. Any purchase or contract made contrary to the provisions hereof shall not be approved by any city officer and the city shall not be bound thereby, except as may be required or provided by law. EXEMPTIONS TO COMPETITIVE BIDDING REQUIREMENTS Section 17. Cooperative purchasing. The director of finance or designee is authorized to recommend to the city council that it join in cooperative purchasing arrangements with other public agencies similarly authorized. Any cooperative purchasing agreement shall comply with RCW 39.34.030(3)including all future amendments, addition and deletions and set forth fully the purposes, powers, rights, objectives and responsibilities of the contracting parties. Any cooperative purchasing agreement shall be governed by the requirements of state law in regard to competitive bidding when applicable. In addition, the director of finance or designee may utilize existing contracts or proposed solicitations of other local, state, or federal agencies to procure materials, supplies, and equipment for the City consistent with legal requirements if such methods of procurement would foster economy and efficiency. Section 18. Emergency procurement. Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Purchasing Polices, the city manager or his/her designated agent may, in accordance with RCW 35A.40.210, 35.22.620(6), and 39.04.280 including all future amendments, additions and deletions, make or authorize others to make emergency procurement of materials, supplies, equipment, or construct public works projects without complying with the competitive requirements of these Purchasing Policies when there exists a threat to public health, welfare, or safety or where the city may suffer a substantial monetary loss by reason of the time required to follow regular purchasing procedures; provided, that such emergency procurement shall be made with such competition as is practicable under the circumstances. A written determination of the basis for the emergency and for the selection of the particular contractor shall be included in the contract file. As soon as practicable, a record of each emergency procurement shall be made and shall set forth the contractor's name, the amount and type of the contract, and a listing of the item(s) procured under the contract, which shall be reported to the city council. Section 19. Other exemptions. A. The finance director or designee is authorized to make open market purchases without obtaining competitive bids or quotations therefor in accordance with RCW 35A.40.210, 35.22.620(6) and 39.04.280 including all future amendments, additions and deletions under the following conditions: Items of Special Design. When an item required is of special design, shape or manufacture to match or fit in with an existing installation and competitive bidding is impracticable; Surplus or Distress Sales. When it is possible to procure obvious bargains in surplus or distress material, supplies or equipment. Items for quick Delivery_. When the obtaining of competitive bids or quotations will cause delay resulting in an appreciable loss to the city; B. Small Items Not Stocked, Blanket Purchase Orders. The director of finance or designee is authorized to establish blanket purchase orders with local vendors for the purchase of items which are not stocked by the departments of the city and are available at usual market prices. Such local vendors shall be selected on the basis of best overall price policies, breadth and depth of stocks and delivery service. C. Sole source procurement. A contract for the purchase of materials, supplies or equipment may be awarded without complying with the bidding requirements of this chapter when the purchasing manager determines in writing, after conducting a good faith review of available sources, that there is only one source for the required materials, supplies or equipment. The director of finance or designee shall conduct negotiations, as appropriate, as to price, terms, and delivery time. A record of sole source procurement shall be maintained that lists each contractor's name, the amount and type of each contract, and a listing of the items(s) procured under each contract. MATERIALS, SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT Section 20. Small purchases. A. General. Any purchase of materials, supplies or equipment not exceeding the bid limit specified in Section 10 shall be considered a "small purchase" and shall be made in accordance with RCW 39.04.190 including all future amendments, additions or deletions. The finance director or designee shall adopt purchase procedures whereby the requirements of Section 11 shall not apply. Insofar as it is practical, three businesses shall be solicited to submit quotations. The finance director or designee shall keep a record of all small purchases and quotations submitted in competition thereon and such records shall be open for public inspection during regular office hours. The finance director or designee shall consider and/or award the purchase order on small purchases to such vendor as the finance director or designee determines to have submitted the lowest responsive, responsible quotation, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. B. Filing of statements on awards to other than vendor submitting lowest quotation. Whet the award for a small purchase is not given to the vendor submitting the lowest quotation, ~ statement of the reasons for placing the order elsewhere shall be prepared and filed with the othe~ papers relating to the transaction. C. Reiection of quotations. The finance director or desginee shall have the authority to rejec~ all quotations or parts thereof, with regard to a small purchase of any materials, supplies, oi equipment when he/she determines the public interest will be served thereby, and upor concurrence with department directors and upon rejection of such quotations shall include thC reason therefor in the records of the transaction. Section 21. Inspection and testing. The director of finance or designee shall inspect or supervise the inspection of all deliveries materials, supplies, or equipment to determine their conformance with the specifications set forth in the request to bid. Inspection by Using Department. The director of finance or designee may authorize a using department having the staff and facilities for adequate inspection to inspect all deliveries made to such using departments, under operational procedures. Tests. The director of finance or designee may require chemical and physical tests of samples submitted with bids and samples of deliveries which are necessary to determine their quality and conformance with the specifications. In the performance of such tests, he/she shall have the authority to make use of laboratory facilities of any outside laboratory. Section 22. Purchases for special events. The city manager may promulgate procedures to govern the purchase of supplies, such as food, beverages, decorations and awards, for public events and employee activities, including employee of the year recognition, volunteer recognition and ceremonial openings of public facilities. PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS Section 23. Definition of public works. RCW 39.04.010 including all future amendments, additions and deletions is incorporated by reference. Section 24. Plans and specifications - Estimates -Publication - Emergencies. When it is determined that a public work or improvement is .necessary, plans, specifications, or both thereof and an estimate of the cost of such work shall be filed with the director of finance or designee. The plans, specifications and estimates of cost shall be approved by the director of finance or designee and the original draft or a certified copy filed with the director of finance or designee before further action is taken. If it is determined that it is necessary or advisable to execute such public work or improvement by any means, e.g., force account, or method other than by contract, and it appears that the estimated probable cost of executing the work will exceed the amount as set forth in RCW 39.04.020 including all future amendments, additions and deletions, then, at least fifteen days before the work is begun, the director of finance or designee shall cause such estimate, together with a description of the work, to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation within the city; except that when any emergency requires the immediate execution of such public work or improvement, upon finding of the existence of an emergency by the authority having power to direct such public work or improvement to be done, duly entered of record, publication of description and estimate may be made within seven days after the commencement of the work. Section 25. Small works roster. A small works roster in accordance with RCW 39.04.155 including all future amendments, additions and deletions may be used for construction of a public work or improvement, as an alternative to general competitive bidding requirements set out in Section 11. The finance director or designee shall maintain a list of contractors who have requested placement on the roster and who are properly licensed or registered to perform work in the State of Washington. Insofar as it is practical, five businesses shall be solicited to submit bids. Once a bidder has been offered an opportunity to bid, that bidder will not be offered another opportunity to bid until all other appropriate contractors on the roster have been offered such an opportunity. Section 26. Bonds and bid security - Noncollusion affidavit -Insurance. Bid Security. Requirement for Bid Security. Bid security shall be required for all competitive bidding for public work or improvement contracts in accordance with RCW 39.08.010 and 39.08.030 including all future amendments, additions and deletions. Bid security shall be of a type and in a form established by the director of finance or designee and approved by the city attorney or designee, which may include a bond provided by a surety company authorized to do business in this state, or the equivalent in cash, cashier's or certified check and shall be included in the bid package. Bid security shall be required on bids for materials, supplies and equipment only if determined necessary by the director of finance or designee. Amount of Bid Security. Bid security shall be in an amount equal to at least five percent of the amount of the bid or in another amount as determined by the purchasing manager. Rejection of Bids for Noncompliance with Bid Security Requirements. When the request for bid requires submittal of bid security, noncompliance will result in rejection of the bid. Withdrawal of Bids. If a bidder is permitted to withdraw its bid before award as provided in Section 1 I(G), the bidder's bid security shall be returned. Contract Performance and Payment Bonds. When required -- Amounts. When a public works or improvement contract is awarded as a result of a call for bids under Section 11 (H) of these Purchasing Policies, the following bonds or security shall be delivered to the city and shall become binding on the parties upon the execution of this contract: A performance bond satisfactory to the city attorney or designee, executed by a suret7 company authorized to do business in this state or othelwvise secured in manner satisfactory t~ the city for an amount equal to one hundred percent of the price specified in the contract. / A payment bond satisfactory to the city attorney or designee, executed by a surety company authorized to do business in this state or otherwise secured in a manner satisfactory tO the city for the protection of all persons supplying labor and material to the contractor or it,, subcontractors for the performance of the work provided for in the contract. The bond shall be ir an amount equal to one hundred percent of the price specified in the contract. Authority to Require Additional Bonds. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limi the authority of the city to require a performance bond or other security in addition to the bond.' specified herein. Noncollusion Affidavit. As part of any bid submitted, the bidder shall be required tr warrant that the bid is a genuine bid and that he or she has not entered into collusion with an 9 other bidder or any other person by submitting with his or her bid an executed and notarized noncollusion affidavit on a form approved by the city attorney. Insurance. Contracts for public works and imprOvements shall contain such requirements for the provision of insurance by the contractor as are determined by the director of finance or designee. Section 27. Administrative procedures. The city manager may promulgate procedures for the purpose of administering public works improvement contracts. Such procedures may define the levels of authority pertaining to review and approval of contract change orders. The director of finance or designee is to report change orders to the city council on a quarterly basis. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PURCHASING POLICIES TO UPDATE THE PURCHASING POLICIES BY INCORPORATING STATE LAWS. WHEREAS, on December 17, 1991, the Federal Way City Council approved staff's recommendation for Purchasing Policies; and WHEREAS, the Purchasing Policies reference the specific dollar amounts that were in effect under State Law in 1991; and WHEREAS, over the years the State Legislature amended the dollar amounts in State Law for various public contracts; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Federal Way find it is in the public's, interest to incorporate State Law into the Purchasing Policies to be more efficient and timely witl: modifications to State Law; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Federal Way adopts the attached Purchasing Polices specifically incorporating State Law where applicable. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolutior should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidit Res. # , Page 1 or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence clause or phrase of this resolution. Section 3. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 4. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upor passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY WASHINGTON, this __ day of ,2003. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ATTEST: MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON, CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. k:~reso\Update Purchasing Policies 10/7/03 Res. #__, Page 2 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Date: To: Via: From: Subject: September 26, 2003 Finance, Economic~ Development and Regional Affairs Committee David H. Mose~~al~ager Iwen Wang, M~'n~g~-n;nt S;r~ces Director 2003 Bond Call BACKGROUND: The City has budgeted for the early retirement of the $11.13 million principal balance of the 1993 Celebration Park Acquisition Bond, carrying an average interest rate of 5.83%. Thc funding sources for this bond call is from past and projected excess utility tax collections. UTILITY TAX PROJECTION UPDATE: The Committee is aware that the utility tax collections for this year are below our budget projections. Our current estimate indicates that there could be a potential shortfall of $800,000 for 2003 from the estimated $7.7 million total utility tax revenue budgeted. The shortfall is attributable to a couple of reasons: 1. The revenue from the new 1% utility tax began on March 1, 2003 rather than January 1, 2003. This delayed collection of the additional 1% is due to the 60 day notification requirement; the billing cycles of the utilities; and potential reporting errors in the early months of the new tax. We are following up with various companies to verify their reporting accuracy. 2. In addition to the delayed collection of the new 1% tax, the base 5% utility tax collection is slightly. below projection. We expected the 5% to generate $6.25 million in 2003 (or $1.25 million for each 1% tax), but the current estimate is the base 5% would generate $5.9 million in 2003 (or $1.18 million per 1% tax). In comparison, the 5% provided $6.1 million (or $1.22 million per 1% tax) in 2002. This is a 2% decline - the first time since the City instituted the utility tax in 1995. The key factors attributed to the decline are the 23% decrease in natural gas rates based on wholesale market in September 2002; and the leveling off of growth in the cellular phone industry. As you are probably aware, Puget Sound Energy recently announced rate increases in 2003 for both natural gas and electric services. These rate increases took effect too late to make any significant impact on the 2003 revenues, but will help the 2004 collections. As discussed at previous committee meetings, we remain confident that the long-term outlook for the utility tax is positive, and that the $1.25 million projected for each 1% utility tax is very achievable in the near future. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: While the long-term outlook for the utility tax is positive, we do have a shortfall in 2003 to completely retire the $11.13 million bond. However, the city also maintains a prefunding reserve that currently has approximately $4 million (this amount is adjusted annually based on the next year's debt service requirement) in the Debt Service Fund. This reserve is currently being invested at a market return rate that is much lOwer than the cost of the outstanding bonds. Therefore, staff recommends that the city proceed with the full retirement of the Celebration Park Acquisition Bond by using a small portion of the prefunding reserve on a temporary basis, and continue to transfer excess utility tax to the debt service fund and/or use any excess PEET that has not been allocated to capital projects to makeup the 2003 utility tax transfer shortfall in 2003 and 2004. Because the bond call and the utility tax transfer are both in the adopted budget, no Council action is required to proceed. The portion of the utility tax transfer not fulfilled in 2003 will be carried forward into 2004 as part of the carry-forward budget adjustment that will be brought to Council early next year. \~c fwmain\vol 1 \data\ms\finance'ffincommf12003\0923~2003 bond call.doc CITY OF ~ Federal Way MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Via: Subject: September 24, 2003 Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee Tho Kraus, Finance Manager David Moseley, City Manager August 2003 Monthly Financial Report Action Requested: Accept the August 2003 Monthly Financial Report and forward to the October 7th Council meeting for full Council approval. K:~FIN~MFR~I FRFEDRACCVR.DOC J-1 MEETING DATE: October 7, 2003 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: August 2003 Monthly Financial Report CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: [] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE [] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt.: $ Contingency Req'd: $ ATTACHMENTS: August 2003 Monthly Financial Report SUMMARY~ACKGROUND: CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Was reviewed and approved by the Finance Committee during their September 30th meeting. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move for the approval of the August 2003 Monthly Financial Report." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: [] APPROVED [] TABLED/DEFERREDfNO ACTION [] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1s* reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 Federal Way 4ugust 2005 Mon M Finon¢iol The Monthly Financial Report is intended to provide an overview of financial activity that has taken place in the reporting period. This report focuses mainly on activity incurred in the following operating funds: General, Street, Arterial Street, Utility Tax Projects, Solid Waste & Recycling, Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax, Paths & Trails, Surface Water Management, Debt Service, and Dumas Bay Center/Knutzen Family Theatre Operations. The Summary of Sources and Uses (Attachment A) captures financial activity through August for the years 1998 through 2003. 35.0 ~ 25.0- · _o 20.0 · ~.":.~ '10.0. ~ · . '.=' Jr; · ' [~.' - -4: YTD Operating Revenues vs Operating Expenditures Thru August REVENUE SUMMARY BY MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES Period Ending August 31, 2003 .......................... (In Thousands~ .......................... :-:':-:':':':':*:':':':':*:*:-:':-:-:! -:-:*:-:-:':-: :-2~3:Re~,ls~O]B~u~t:. *:,~t~tl~:- :-:-:.Yt~dc;e:-:*:-'. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::: :-:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:::::::::::: ::::::::::::::: :::::~.~.'!¥::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::~¢¢!:::: :::::::::::::::: :~.~!i:: ::i~fo.~a~:: :::td.~.~.o~.'.~!~):::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::;~4~;,i::: :::~k,;~;6:: ::;~,it::: :::~ii:: ::::5::::: :::::~;::::' Prope*'tyTaxes $ 4,023 $ 7,777 $ 4,243 $ 4243 0.0~ Sales Tax 7,130 tl,000 7,224 6,950 (273 -3.85' Hotel/Motel Ledglng Tax 74 t34 78 89 12 14.95{ Criminal Jus6ce Sales Tax 1,057 1,611 1,059 1,042 (17} -1.65{ Inte~jovemmental 2,278 3,346 2,157 1,854 (303}-14.1'~ Real Estate Excise Tax 1,639 1,900 1,222 t ,927 705 57.7! Sambling Taxes 1,411 1,850 1,225 1287 62 5.15{ Utility Taxes 4,299 7,748 5,226 4,647 (579}-t1.15{ Court Revenue 478 1,019 629 839 210 33.55{ Building Permits/Fees-CD 1,068 1,180 819 909 92 11.2< Expedited Review Fees-CD 56 131 131 0.05{ ROW Perrnits/Fees-PW 208 369, 253 244 (10) -3.85{ Expedited Review Feas-PW 42 - Licenses 84 142 80 52 (29) -35.65{ Franchise Fees 473 622 464 501 38 8. t5{ Passport Agency Fees - I 13 13 n/~ Recreation Fees 484 930 470 544 74 15.8~ :)ureas Bay Centre 343 494 316 336 20 625{ ~nutzen Family 'n~eatre 52 70 38 80 42 110.95{ Interest Earnings 305 744 485 284 (201)-41.45{ ~,dmin/Cash Mgmt Fees310 527 351 351 (0) 0.05{ SWM Fees 1,632 3,433 1,785 1,758 (26) -1.5~ Refuse Collection Fees 120 165 136 136 0 0.05{ Police Services 510 926 639 627 (11) -1.8°,{ MisceilaneousJOther 72 98 i 57 78 21 0.05{ S~bio~p~-.Ct~;~.:-:- :.:.~;~..:.:.~i~o~4, i :*:.:~ ~:~: :':':~9~: :;::¥~.~.'):::::~..~ Other Financing Sources 4,489 16,056 12,492 12,492 - 0.05{ Total'Revenues~&Other.*.... .-....~*...*.. *.-...-.....-.- $i~ht?:e~:;:':':;¥':':':':*:*:*:. $:-~,b~' -S.;.:~.;~;~(~ General governmental operating revenue collections August total $29M which is $162K or 0.6% below budget of $29.11M. Of this amount, $126K is re] Utility taxes and REET that are reserved for the pa3~ debt services. Real Estate Excise Tax To date, REET of $1.9M exceed the ytd budget of $1 $705K or 58%. Compared to 2002, collections are up or 18%. August's receipt of $262K is $69K ab( monthly estimate and includes a total of 279 real transactions, of which 92 were tax exempt and of ret 187, 7 were mobile home sales. The largest transa¢ current month consist of the sale of an office bldg Campus Corp Park, and Cedar Gardens Apts on S~ Pl. Sales Tax *Budget is pm~ected based on pest 5 yea~s history. Sales tax received through August of $7M is $273K below the ytd budgeted amount of $7.2M. 2003 ytd of $7M is also below August 2002 ytd revenue of $; ort :hrough the ytd ated to nent of .2M by ;288K 'e the estate ~aining ions in at East 337th r 3.8% :venue 1M by City of Federal Wa}, $180K or 2.5%. The current month's receipt of $964K is above the monthly estimate of $961K by $3K or 0.3%. Sales Tax by SIC Code Retail sales continue to remain the largest source of sales tax revenue, accounting for 64.3% of all sales tax collections. Ytd retail sales tax collection is $49K or 1% lower than the year 2002. Miscellaneous trade, retail furniture, general merchandise, and Apparel & Accessories are down while bldg materials, food stores and retail eating & drinking are up. Services industry accounts for 12.9% of the total sales tax collections through August. On ytd basis, services sales tax is up $37K or 4.4% from the year 2002. The increase is mainly due to new installations at one of the major amusement facilities and increase activities in Auto Repair. The variance in hotels/motels is also contributing to the increase in ytd collections. Construction and contracting activity, which accounts for 10% of sales tax collections, is $50K or 6.7% below year 2002 activity. Wholesale tax which accounts for about 4.5% of total sales tax collection, is $47K or 13% below year 2002 activity due to overall decline in activity. SALES TAX ACTIVI'P( BY SIC CODE YTD Thr~h ~t 2003 12,9% August 2003 Monthly Financial Report % chg f~m pmv yr -1Z 6% 21. 3% na Peroent ~ of total 1.0% 1.2% 02% The City's largest retail center, South 348th, which generates over 13% of the City's sales tax experienced a decrease of $8K or 1% when compared to the year 2002. The increases in building materials and retail eating & drinking were offset by the decreases in other categories. SeaTac Mall is showing a decrease of $46K or 7% when compared to year 2002 activity. On a monthly basis, tax received in current month is virtually same as August 2002. The year-to-date tax from the Mall's department stores, which generate more than one-half of the Mall's sales tax, has decreased $35K or 9% compared to 2002. Major Auto Sales through August have collected $284K, which is $9K or 3% below the same period in 2002. The variance was caused by the late filing on one of car dealers. S 312t~ to S316t~ is up $13K or 4% from the prior year. The increase is attributable to a $17K increase by the center's biggest box retailer that is offset by $4K net decrease from the other retailers in the center. Pavilion Center is down $39K, or 13.5% due to the downward trend in the retail industry. The center is experiencing across the board decline in activities and is mainly attributed to the center's biggest contributor. Hotels & Motels sales tax collected through August total $84K, which is $15K or 21% above the same period in 2002. The increase is mainly attributed to timing differences in returns filed by one major hotel, increasing activities at another hotel, and a new hotel opened August 2002. Sales Tax Activity by Area Ci~ of Federal WaV Sales Tax By Area ~hru August 2003 S 312th to $ 316th Pavilion Center 5.2% 3.6% Major' Auto 4.1% SeaTac Mall $.5% S 348~ Re~l Block 13.3% Hotels 8, Motets 1.2% 64.2% Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax Hotel/Motel lodging tax total collection through August of $89K is $12K or 15% above the year-to-date budget of $78K. The increase is mainly attributable to timing differences in returns filed by one major hotel, increasing activities at another hotel, and a new hotel opened August 2002. Jan 7,374 7,952 8,122 170 2.1% Feb 8,359 8,105 12,316 4,211 52.0% Mar 6,072 9,017 12,153 3,136 34.8% Apr 7.769 9,031 11,436 2,405 26.6% May 8,491 11,087 11,449 362 3.3% Jun 8,938 9,282 9,109 (1731 -1.9% Jul 13,751 11,276 12,110 834 7.4% Aug 12,915 11,988 12,608 620 5.2% Sep 13,802 15,530 Oct 13,4791 14,433 Nov 13,3671 12,516 Dec 14,982 I 13,783 Ta~e rejects C~h baSis accounting August 2003 MonthlF Financial Re oort Jan $210,579 156,005 $159,323 $ 3,318 2.1% Feb 212,309 151,800 152,943 1,14;~ 0.8% Mar 175,625 144,863 160,415 15,55:~ 10.7% Apr 189,533 177,474 176,029 (1,449) -0.8% May 167,112 157,198 184,574 27,37§ 17.4% Jun 161,592 156,862 160,030 3,168 2.0% Jul 142,814 150,802 151,214 !121 0.3% Aug 150,984 129,820 142,354 12, 9.7% Sep 139,851 140,427 Oct 134,904 164,430 - Nov 119,265 160,735 - Dec 121,874 159,584 Utility Tax The utility tax rate increased from 5% to 6% e ctive February 1, 2003. The additional 1% was adored by Council to fund new service level adjustments~nd is budgeted to yield an additional $1.25M. However, time we do not anticipate meeting budget projections the leveling off of utility tax, 2002's actual falling s meeting year-end projection, and the 1% increase not effect until February lst. Council also approved an ordinance earlier this year that would provide utility tax relief for low income senior ~. The ordinance would relieve the full 6% of the utility tax to eligible citizens through a City administered "~ebate' program. The first requests for reimbursement of pai~12003 (February through December) utility taxes will be due no later than April 30, 2004. I at this due to ~ort of taking Gambling Tax Gambling tax collection of $1.29M is $62K or 5.1% above the year-to-date budget of $1.22M. In comparison to 2002 year-to-date collections, 2003's tax collection is lower by $124K or 8.8%. August's collection of $142K is $13K or 9.7% above the mommy budget estimate of $130K. YTD collections from the top five largest establishments (in terms of tax revenue) have decreased $85K or 6.6% from the same period of 2002. These 5 establishments are responsible for 93% of the year-to-date tax collections. City of Federal Way August 2003 Monthly Financial Report Utility tax received through August total $4.65M, which is $579K or 11% below the ytd budget total of $5.23M. The ytd thru August 2003 utility tax receipt is above the same period in 2002 by $348K or 8%. The year-to-date electricity tax includes a one-time back payment of $52K from Puget Sound Energy for the audit periods 1999 through September 2002. In June 2003, we also received a payment of $4K from Verizon Wireless for the periods 1999 thru April 2003 based on audit results by Microflex consulting fn'm. In addition to $4K already receipted for the same audit periods, we are anticipating assessments of $136K on Comcast and $19K on Sprint PCS. Puget Sound Energy reported a sharp decrease in gas revenues due to rate decrease that took effect in September, 2002. The rate hike in April 2003 had not helped much on lost revenues over the winter peak season. Gas taxes are below the ytd budget of $881K by $276K or 31%. Electricity is below the ytd budget of $1.8M by $134K or 8%. Cable taxes are below the ytd budget of $499K by $18K or 4%. Phone taxes are below the ytd budget of $768K by $85K or 11%. Cellular phone taxes are below the ytd budget of $900K by $88K or 10%. Compared to ytd 2002, Electricity is up $247K or 18%, Gas is down $156K or 21%, Cable is up $74K or 18%, Phone is up $27K or 4%, and Cellular phone is up $86K or 12%. As of December 5th, 2002 the effective date of 1-776, local license fees collected in King and Pierce Counties are being held in an account at the State Treasurer's Office until it is determined whether the initiative is constitutional. According to the state, through August the City's share is $502K and it is now on Attorney General's hands for final review before the actual distribution to local governments. Building Permits and Plan Check Fees Ytd building permit revenues total $909K, which is above the ytd budget by $91K or 11.1%. This does not include ytd pass through revenues of $131K. Revenues collected for expedited review is currently not budgeted nor are the offsetting expenditures. Building permits, which includes mechanical, plumbing and clear/grade permits total $437K and is above the ytd budget by $33K or 8%. Electrical permits of $85K are above the ytd budget of $72K by $12.7K or 18%. Plan check fees of $308K are $31K or 11% above the ytd budget estimate of $277K. Utility Tax Revenue YTD Thru August 2003 Pagers 2.1% 0.1% Cellular Eleca'ic 17.5% Phone 14.7% Cable Gas 13.0% 10.4% Garbage 6.7% State Shared Revenue Ytd distribution of $2.9M is below the ytd budget of $3.2M by $320K or 10%. The unfavorable variance is due mainly to vehicle licensing fees offset by major increases in criminal justice high crime and liquor profits tax. ** Expenditures include Community Development Admin, Planning, and Building. The following table presents a synopsis of. ytd building permit activity as of August 31st for new construction between 2001 and 2003. 4 Cit~ o[ Federal WaF August 2003 Monthly Financial RePort :Building DWbion - Permit Activity YTD Through Au~mt, 2003 2001 2001 2002 2002 2003 20~3 New Resldential (Platted) 24 $ 3,342,470 107 $ 23,263~349105 $ 24,167,393 New Commercial 15 30,535,448 19 35,658,686 10 1,050,972 New Mul ti. Family lJnits 4 1,051,687 I 0 I 1,042,389 New Public 0 0 0 0 0 SubtotaI-NewC~o~t~uctioo 43 $ 34,929,605 127 $ 58,922,035 116 $ 26,2.60,754 Manufa~:tured Homes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential Altcra6ons 101 3,003,30010g 2,321,74095 2,808,247 Commemial Altecatioos 158 13,174,497 309 17,968,713 164 12,533,964 Plumbing Only 56 0 60 0 74 0 Mechanical Only 226 1,137,610201 888,490 218 972,276 Misc. Bu/Idin[~ Permits0 0 0 0 0 0 · :Subtolal-Alte~tiom 541 $ 17,315,407678 $ 21,178,943551 $ 16,314,487 Electxical Permits 710 0 838 0 718 Total Bulldinl[Permits1294 $ 52,245,012 1643 $ 80,100,978 1385 $ 42,575,241 Non-Building Permits: Si~n Permits 181 342,818167 361,273158 313,724 To~ls 181 $ 342,818 167 $ 361,273 158 $ 313,724 Total Commercial Valuation 173 $ 43,709,945 328 $ 53,627,399 174 $ 13,584,936 Commercial al u % of Tomi 13% 84% 20% 67% 13% 32% * In~lud~ all r~w, alternation ROW Permits and Fees Overall Public Works permits and fees collected through August total $244K, which is $10K or 4% below the ytd budget of $253K. Right-of-way permits collected total $60K which is $72K or 55% below the ytd budget of $132K. Plan review fees collected total $69K which is $21K or 23% below the ytd budget of $90K. Public works inspection fees of$115K is $83K or 259% above the ytd budget of $32K. Month Ave ! 24,957; 30,788 I 30,450 '. Court Revenue Court revenue is at the ytd budget total of $564K from fines & forfeitures. Total court revenue collected through August amounts to $839K which is $210K or 33% above last year's collections of $518K by $321K or 62%. Probation services revenue total $275K and is $211K or 329% above the ytd budget. Ytd probation expenditures total $228K resulting in net probation revenue of $47K. Probations contract was recemly revised and is expected to have an unfavorable impact to probation revenues. Revenue $ 64,167 $ 275,013 $ 210,847 Expenses 64,167 227,649 (163,482) January $48,982 63,816 $55,490 ($8,32~)[ -13.0% Februa~ 57,256 68,634 78,815 10,181 [ 14.8%: Mamh 69,769 80,526 82,635 2,10~ 2.6~ Apfll 72.609 74,543 73,723 (814) -1.1 ~{ May 46,487 68,011 67,131 (881[)I -1.3~1 June 49,004 66,920 77,763 10,84~ ] 16.2~ ~ugust 68,659 73,086 57,817 (169) -20.9~{ September 55.775 66,410 October 79,013 69,583 November 67,344 62,970 December 66,133 50,036 Probation Services 38,724 I 64,167 275,013 210,847l ] 328.6% · Included in ClxJft Reveftue me Pmba6o~ Se~vi(:~s and ~mittances ff~m District Coufl fo~"Shale I Court. Costs', 'Coort Recoil/Services" aed Other' Court-related miscellaneous ~eve~ue. Traffic ~chool is now Traffic and non-parking fmes total $346K and is $9K or 3% above the ytd budget. Compared to ytd 2002, collect.ons are above by $76K or 28%. Parking infractions total $41K and is $9K or 29% abt,ve the ytd budget. Compared to ytd 2002, collections are above by $20K or 100%. DUI and other misdemeanors total $94K and is $4K o r 5% above the ytd budget. Compared 'to ytd 2002, collect: ons are below by $9K or 9%. Criminal costs total $43K and is $11K or 20% below ~he ytd budget. Compared to ytd 2002, collections are below by $7K or 20%. Parking Infractions $20,555 51,O07 3',678 I 41,017 I 91339 I DUI & Other MIsd $103,856 145,047 90,083 [ 94,442 I 41359 I 4'80A Criminal Traffic Mlsd$40,570 63,489 39,4301 3,,648 [ t762)1 Criminal Costs* $35,909 87,432 54,301 I 43,256 1 (11t045)1 -20.3% Shared Court Costs $3,352 11,532 7,162 I 3,068 I (4~004)1 -57.2% Traff ScM Adm Fee 1,457 0 OI OI OI 0.0% Cit~ of Federal Wa}, August 2003 Monthl}, Financial Report General governmental expenditures through August total $26.42M or 47% of the annual operating budget of $55.9M. Operating expenditures are below the ytd budget of $28.1M by $1659K or 6%. EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT Period Ending August 31, 2003 In Thousands) :.:.:-:.:-:.:.:.:-:.:':.:.:.:.:':-:.:.:-I-:-:':-:.:-:-: z00~e0~ :~*~,,:..:.:.:..V.a~,~,:.:.:.: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1 i:i~:i: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::~.~!:: ::'.~.h.~.~: :::'.~.b~:: ::;~b~.~.t:: ::::::::::::::::::::::: .~ityCouncil S 203 S 260 S 207 $ 220 S (13) -6.4% .~ity Manager 478 691 467 430 37 7.9% ~lunicipal Court-Operations 792 1.211 797 922 (124) -15.6% danagernent Services 1,112 2,005 1,295 1,130 165 12.7% ~ivilK;dminal Legal Services ! 775 1,449 962 768 194 20.2% .~omm. Development Svcs 1,864 3,662 2,373 2,182 192 8.1% ~olice Services 9,116 15,572 10,138 9,904 234 2.3% Jail Se~ices 648 I 1,342 805 706 99 12.3% 3arks and Recreatio~ 2,062 4,042 2,685: 2,320 365 13.6% =ublic Works 2,269 4,090 2,553 i 2,193 360 14.1% ;ity OveHay Program 1,292 2,379 1.430 1,430 0.0% ~olid Waste 194 421 268 186 82 30.5% qotel/Motel Lodging Tax 73 312 54 54 0.0% Surface Water Management 1,138 2,198 1,406 1,290 116 8.3°~ Debt Se~,qce 2,230 15.630 2.342 2,342 0.0~ Dumas Bay Centre 336 494 328 332 (3) -1.0~ K.'-utzo~.Fa.'ni!~T~,atre 100 !77 ~ 11.~ IL9_)' -~93~, ~ublftlal, O1)orE~ .. 24..6.80.~5.S:9.II$~. 2e..~208: 26.525 1.6~13 · "lF'l'i,lf~lllfl,~ ti%eli' 8 l;~i 7,) I~1 '5816 1!; 9:8 · · n l'~'xpe~tdil.res & - , . ~. ~.fi~.'.u.~::;:::;:;:;:;:::::::::::[:~ :~,i!~:~.:~:/~;~:t:¥:~!;~:t:.lt:~:J:~:-~;~:t:::::::~.~i~ City Council City Council expenditures total $220K, which is above the ytd budget total of $207K by $13K or 6%. The unfavorable variance is due mainly to the additional 10K support to Airport Communities Coalition approved by Council, but not yet budgeted by ordinance. City Manager Activity through August total $430K, which is below the ytd budget total of $467K by $37K or 8%. Savings are due to one-time funded new programs. Municipal Court Municipal Court expenditures total $922K, which is above the ytd budget total of $797K by $124K or 16%. The variance is due to a higher than budgeted BI contract expenses. However, BI contract revenue more than offsets the expenditure increase. Civil/Criminal Legal Services Law expenditures through August total $768K, which is below the ytd budget total of $962K by $194K or 20%. Savings can be found in Civil Legal Services salaries and benefits, ongoing outside legal counsel and public defender, and one-time funded programs. Management Services Management Services expenditures through August total $1130K, which is below the ytd budget total of $1295K by $165K or 13%. Savings are due to one-time funded programs Community Development Community Development expenditures through August total $2.18M, which is below the ytd budget total of $2.37M by $192K or 8%. Savings are due to one-time funded programs. Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax Ytd expenditures are comprised of tourism enhancement grants ($25K), General Fund admin fees ($9K), events planning-Korean Cultural & Sports Festival and Women's Marathon/Sporting Event ($15K), visitor information ($2.3K), traffic investigation ($2K), postcards and other ($1K). Overall revenues total $92K and are made up of hotel/motel tax ($89K), interest earnings ($2K), and postcard sales ($47). Public Works Public Works Operations: Public Works Operating expenditures are below August's ytd budget of $2.55M by $360K or 14%. Savings can be found in the timing of some contract payments and one-time funded new programs. Solid Waste and Recycling Operations: Expenditures are below ytd budget of $268K by $82K or 31%. Savings are due to the timing of grant payments. Surface Water Management Operations: Expenditures are below ytd budget of $1406K by $116K or 8%. Savings can be found in one-time funded new programs and salaries and benefits due to the late hiring of the new SWM Inspector. Public Safety Operations Police Services have expended $9.9M through August, which is below the ytd estimated budget of $10.14M by $234K or 2%. As shown in the table below, salaries and benefits are below the budget estimate but are offset by overages in overtime and termination pay. : · .: "' ~,oo~ym'ni6,'~a~usi":, :'. · . .. .. . . : ~ · ..-.: · · ..:~:~; $ Vadance % Vafia~ ~n~l Fa~e Fa~e B~g~ ~ ~ ~ A~I (~a~e) (U~a~e) ~lad~ 8,~3,~7 5.~,~1 5,5~,~1 ~1,571 5.8~ P3 278,318 278,318 J~,~l 81,9~ ~.5% r~p H~p ~,216 ~.1~ ~,1~ 1~.0% ~ 2~,~ 170,~ ~,7~ (210.748} -124.0~ r~t~ ~y 37,~9 (37,~9) ~ts 2,211,~ 1,474,~7 1,313,287 161,0~ 10.~ T~ ~ ~ :" ~' ;'~'~: ::' '~;?'*~" : ' '~; .... " ' ? ' ' · ".".4 ~ · '..~,~ z;~,~ z,~,4~s '~,~ .~ Year-to-date Police overtime is 42% or approximately $233K below the same period last year. There is a $19K increase in overtime for contracted services and the homeland security programs. When the increase from the billable overtime is included, the total overtime is decreased by 36% or around $214K, during the first eight months of the year. Cit}, of Federal PS Overtime By Type 2002 2003 $ % Training 57,989 19,744 (38,245) -66% Court 27,180 35,723 8,544 31% Field Operation 418,712 231,504 (187,209) -45% SOAP 7,466 2,271 (5,195) -70% Olher 48,076 37,544 (10,532) -22% City Portion 559,424 326,787 (232,637) -42% Conlract or Grant $ 35,132 $48,903 $ 13,771 39% Homeland Sec. 5,059 5,059 NA Billal~e 35,132 53,962 18,830 54% Grand Total $ 594,555 $380,748 $(213,8071 -36% As shown by the month-to-month overtime comparison graph, the decrease started in February and has stayed about half of last year's spending from March through June of this year. In July and August overtime reflected similar trends to 2002, however at lower levels of expenditures. If the present trend continues, we should end the year with around $640,000 of total overtime costs for a reduction of 35% from the 2002 expenditures of $982,445. $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $20,000 Police Overtime Expense Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month The 2003 budget considers the elimination of the $25 court administration fee, which was redirected to a traffic school fee, and an additional $25 for other indirect costs. The budget also establishes a direct expenditure budget of $60K to cover direct ongoing traffic school costs such as overtime and supplies, etc. The following is an analysis on traffic school activity. Thru August, revenues total $154K while expenditures total $38K, resulting in net revenues of $116K. Revenue $ 49,512 $ 153,709 $ 104,197 210.4% Expenditures: Overtime Supplies Travel/Training Other Charges Capital total Expend 24,614 12,599 4,790 681 3,958 46,642 33,576 3,932 295 195 37,998 (8,962) 8,667 4,495 486 3,958 8,644 -36.4% 68.8% 93.8% 71.4% 100.0% 18.5% Rev Over / (Under) Exp $ 2,870 $ 115,711 $ 95,553 3329.4% August 2003 Monthly Financial Re ~ort Jail Services The table below compares activity through July as August invoices have not been received. Jail Services is be low the ytd budget of $805K by $99K or 12%. The annual b~ ~dget of $1.34M may be slightly high when compared to 2002's annual total of $1.07M. ..... · . ~O/l, .......... January $ 108,739 $ 104,341 I $ 92,944 $11,3[ 109~ February 112,436 108,264I 86,453I 21,81 120.1% March [ 99,516I 115,827I 95,849I 19,97 17.2% April I 64'2591 112,174I 104,6601 7,51 I 6.7% May I 75'9071 121,090I 110,778I 10,31 I 8'5°/" June I 7<0451 113,642I 10&047[ 5,5~. [ 4.9% July ] 92,830I 129,861 [ 107,300t 22,5~ 117.4°/" August 91,360 118,729 - - September [ 89,959I 111,3901 -I I ' October I 79'588 I 1°4'878 I 'l I ' November [ 84,463I 102,292I 'l I ' Parks and Recreation Parks Operations expenditures through August total which is $365K or 14% below the ytd budget of $ Dumas Bay Center and Knutzen Family T! expenditures exceed the ytd budget estimate, but an by higher than anticipated revenues. B20K, 2.68M. teatre's offset Kenneth Jones Memorial Pool Ytd pool expenditures total $137K and includes ~ $35K payment for the pool's continued operations undq: King County. This amount is net of the $76K one-time p~yment received from King County to be used for the operation and maintenance of the pool. Operating Revenue I 314,000 I * 68,041 Salaries & Benefits I I 62,296 Suppr, es I I King C~s-lntedocal Agreement I I 34,922 Travel & Training I I 964 Other Serw~es & Charges I I 1 ,e29 Intergovernmental I I 421 Capital Improvements/Maintenance[ I 16,423 Inlorfund Char(jes [ [10.370 :tivity June. ting in The following table summarizes the total pool's ~ under King County's continued operations through Revenues total $81K and expenses total $202K, resul a subsidy of $121K. .CRv of Federal Wav ,ourse Revenue 35,762 Rental Revenue 20,158 Point of Sale (Drop-In) 24,841 Salaries & Benefits 142,902 Supplies 5,644 Utilities 46,317 Other Svcs & Charges 7,336 Celebration Park: The following table is a breakdown of Celebration Park maintenance and operations. Ytd revenue of $224K consists of a $221K subsidy from the Utility Tax Fund, and $4K in concession fees. A portion of the revenues from ball field and field light rentals are accounted for in. youth and adult athletic programs. M&O expenditures total SXl~K. 2~{e~c Operating Revenue - Concession Fees 28,000 $ 4,987 Tournament Revenue * 44,490 44,490 Transfer-In from Utility Tax 220,803 220,803 ' ~ ' Salaries & Benefits 182,116 144,991 Supplies '~- 31,850 18,182 Professional Services 4,000 3,328 Leases/Rentals 6,000 4,450 Electricity 40,000 20,808 Water & Sewer 32.000 i 4,974 Repairs & Maintenance 9,000 3,487 Interfund Charges 8,940 5,960 * The revenue shown is foe the full year based on booking records form youth and adult softball and soccer tournaments, filed rentals, gate fees, and light charges. Both budget and actual am accounted in rec. division and are not separated ouL The budget amount is shown only fo~ illuslrative purpose. August 2003 Monthly Financial Report Recreation and Cultural Services: Direct program expenditures total $697K or 51.9% of the total annual budget of $1.34M not including indirect costs. Including indirect administration costs, recreation expenditures total $936K and are 54.7% of the total annual budget of $1.71M. Recreation fees total $523K and are 57.9% of the total annual budget of $902.5K. Recreation fees have recovered 75.1% of direct program costs and is 7.8% above the annual budgeted recovery ratio of 67.3%. Considering indirect administration costs, the recovery ratio is reduced to 55.9% or 3.1% above the annual budgeted recovery ratio of 52.8%. Dumas Bay Centre: Operating expenditures through August total $332K, which is $3K or 1% above the ytd budget of $328.4K. Dumas Bay Centre has recovered 101.3% of its operating expenses. Dumas Bay Centre operating revenues of $336K are also up by $20K or 6% compared to the ytd budget of $316K. Knutzen Family Theatre: Operating expenditures through August total $118K, which is $19K or 19% above the ytd budget of $99K. Operating revenues of $80K is also up $42K or 111% compared to the ytd budget of$38K. Knutzen Theatre has recovered 68.1% of its operating expenses. RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS .Aquatic~ 2,000 1,35~1 67.5% 20,621 21,364 10316% 9.7% 6.3°4 Arts & Special Events 87,600 52,818 60.3% 105,950 79,176 74.7% 82.7% 66.704 Youth Athletics 58,450 48,970 83.8% 86,801 36,251 41.8% 67.3% 135.104 Adult Athletics 198,000 156,640 79.1% 112,981 96,154 85.1% 175.3% 162.9°4 ~nmunity Recreation 165,500 129,821 78.4% 136,627 142,925 104.6% 121.1% 90.804 Community Center 26,500' 15,421 58.2% 87,555 45,437 51.9% 30.3% 33.9°4 Recreation Inc 17,700 27,083 153.0% 52,076 42,625 81.9% 34.0% 63.504 Youth Commission 500 64 12.8% 1,800 1,060 58.9% 273% 6.004 Red, White & Blue . 24,700 22,416 90.8% 41,200 50,151 121.7% 60.0% n/~ Senior Se~ices 7,500 17,584 234.5% 82,30! 44,534 54.1°/ 9.1% 39.~eA ~~ ~ ~ Bl~El~lffi ~ [i~l~ ~ 111111~50'691 16.1% 614,000 136.8361 22.3% 51.1% 37.0~ Administration 0.0% 366,977 239,035 65.1% n/a ' DUMAS BAY CENTRE I Knutzen Family Theatre I 74,476 [ 80,478 [ 10&1%] 177,050 I 118,156 I 66'7%1 42'1%1 68.1%J Arts Commission ' - - n/ai 85 745 21,299 ' 24.8% n/a n/aI Revenues do not include grants o~ operating transfers. Expenditures do not include residual equity transfers ~ othe~ i~te~und contrit)ut~ons. CitF of Federal Way August 2003 MonthlF Financial R orr Special Revenue: Artedal Street 695,572 1,555,732 1,429,827 125,905 821,477 Utility Tax (1) 7,872,948 4,649,928 12,522,876 (7,872,948) ~-~ Solid Waste & Recycling 162,896 205,878 186,148 19,730 182,62( Special Study (Gev. TV) 106,511 1,014 5,576 (4,562) 101,94c~ Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax 182,119 91,557 54,078 37,480 219,5~ 2% for the Arts 28,114 20,089 (20,089) 8,02.~ CDBG (2) 5,943 86,653 77,355 9,298 15,241 Paths & Trails 51,592 6,203 6,203 57,794 Capital Project: Public Safety Facility 7.440.966 160.182 1.912.334 2.072.516 9.513.483 Downtown Revitalization 1,031,140 - 1,031,140 (1,031,140) C Unallocated 1997 Bond Proceeds 20,365 20,365 (20,365) Community/Senior Center/Pool 785, 519 68,502 717,017 717,01 Celebration Pa rk 107,908 5,473 5,473 113,381 Park Improvements 574.042 1,051,597 476,507 575,089 1,149.13~ Surf,a~e Water Management 6,634,716 731,611 672,180 59,431 6,694,147 TranSportation 8,092,939 8,808,9421 6,732,215 2,076,727 10,169,66( Enterprise Funds: Surface Water Management 487,502 1,762,000: 2,079,330 (317,330) 170,17~ Dumas Bay Cenffe Operations ,335,479 331,667 3,812 3,81 Dumas Bay Centre Capital 162,098 305,584 157,296 148,288 310,38( Knutzen Family Theatre Capital 99,660 1,399: 1,399 101,05c. Knutzen Family Theatre Operations 159,245 118,156 41,089 41,08c. Infernal Service Funds: (3) Risk Management 4,057,551 519,801 445,970 73,831 4,131,38~ information Systems 1,962,972 1,085,436 1,050,021 35,415 1,998,38~ Mail & Duplication 140,528 146,924 95,717 51,207 191,7~ Fleet & Equipment 2,119.918 895,790 922,027 (26,237) 2,093,681 Buildinqs & Fumi,,flfin(is &39 634 , 283 ,079 2n0 0.30 82 2.t9 , 891 ,P,8,'. S, sbto, tal'l, nt~rn, al SerVice F, md$ , 9.090.603. 2,93f.0.29 ;, 2.714,564 216,466',,, , , 9,307,068 rotal,~ilFunds ' $ 57,993,830 · $ 56,769/579 -'$ 56,187,283 '. $ 4,406,964 $ 62,400,794 (1) Utility Tax and Debt Service fund balance is reserved for the payment of debt service. (2) CDBG deficit fund balance due to timing of grant reimbursements. (3) Intemal Service fund balance is comprised of accumulated replacement reserves for the purpos~ e of fixed asset replacement with the exception of Risk Management, which is comprised of accumulated reserves for self-insurance and strategic reserve. ATTACHMENT A CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SUMMARY OF SOURCES AND USES OPERATING FUNDS Through August 2003 1998 - 2003 : : ~.0.~)3 R~yls~d..B~f~get .... Actuals Vadance - -- Through Through Favorable (U.n favorable) ~ourcesAJses 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Annual August Auc~ust Dollars ($) . Percent (%) IBeginningFund Balance $ 13,915,993 $ 17,580,138 $18,050,656 $20,817,900 $22,799,494 $ 24,252,617 $ 24,620,497 $ 24,598,825 $ (21.672) -0.1% ::)peratlng Revenues ~roperty Taxes 3,381,265 3,557,241 ! 3,672,303 i 3,810,030 4,023,186 7,777,226 4,242,914 4,242,914 - ! 0.0% ;ales Tax 5,630,971 6,214,084 ! 6,874,166 I 6,810,474 7,130,469 10,999,574 7,223,831 6,950,349 (273,482) -3.8% -Iotel/Motel Lodging Tax 15,631 65,605i 88,854 73,670 134,000 77,738 89,303 11,565 14.9°.4 `3riminal Justice Sales Tax 878,427 959,674 1,065,926 i 1,114,547 1,057,326 1,611,369 1,058,678 1,042,102 (16,576) -1.6% Intergovernmental 3,316,984 3,374,296 3,037,741 2.617,022 2,277,807 3,345,546 2,157,236 1,854,069 i (303,167) -14.t% Real Estate Excise Tax 1,612,556 1,445,579 1,431,606 1,163,667 1,638,946 1,900,000 1,221,744 1,926,803 705,059 57.7% 3ambling Taxes 212,341 966,742 1,006,156 1,488,019 1,410,548 t,850,000 1,224,824 1,286,883 62,059 5.1o.4 Jtility Taxes 3,178,957 3,532,394 3,741,479 4,214,773 4,299,462 7,747,611 5,226,006 4,647,186 (578,820) -11.1% 3ourt Revenue 543,566 562,46t 621,004 588,297 477,956 1,018,813 628,596 838,999 i 210,403 33.5% 3uiiding Permits/Fees-CD 635,271 983,353 685,156 716,298 1,068,264 1,179,816 818,603 909,172 i 90,569 11.1% -:.xpedited Review Fees-CD 8,211 62,799 81,225 78,508 55,860 130,803 130,803 I 0.0% :~OW Permits/Fees-PW 157,542 155,675 191,837 259,806 208,144 369,455 253,264 243,596 i (9,668) -3.8% =-xpedited ReviewFees-PW 8,003 40,345 32,058 15,962 41,771 26,618 26,618 I 0.0% Licenses 35,526 107,823 64,743 58,922 83,810 i 142,100 80,147 51,591 I (28,555) -35.6% =ranchise Fees 344,922 353,299 366,550 429,580 472,568 621,964 463,707 501,495 I 37,786 8.1% :~assport Agency Fees ' I 12,600 i 12,600 n/a Recreation Fees 338,164 462,468 415,721 457,195 484,055 930,450 469,669 543,799 74,130 15.8% :)umas Bay Centre 209,486 312,941 305,931 394,140 343,233 493,750 316,230 335,919 , 19,689 6.2% (nutzen Fatuity Theatre 24,597 39,321 47,320 52,085 69,976 38,166 80,478 ! 42,312 110.9% 'nterest Earnings 510,968 718,407 745,940 650,828 304,854 743,621 485,183 284,183 ! (201,000) -41.4o.4 ~.dmin/Cash Mgmt Fees 110,660 112,320 99,335 317,536 310,353 526,592 351,061 351,061 I (0) 0.0% SWM Fees 1,625,811 1,710,775 1,624,892 1,583,371 1,632,138 3,432,770 1,784,791 1,758,414 (26,376) -I.5% ~efuse Collection Fees 98,103 99,048 83,681 100,049 120,225 165,240 136,215 136,245 30 0.0% :~olice Services 96,519 223,298 525,356 534, t 12 510,258 926,082 638,791 627,326 (11,465) -1.8% Miscellaneous/Other 1,052,666 100 297 44,280 44,685 71,879 I 98,292 57,379 , 78,224 20.845 36.3% total Operating Revenues ; 23,986,918 i 2,6,095,546 ; 26,822,,012 ' 27,583,995 28,148,867 ; 46,084,247 : 29,112,193 . 28,980,132 (162,061~ -0.6% ::)peraflng Expenditures ,3ky Council 158,220 151,163 156,409 164,800 203,286 260,050 207,273 220,465 (13,192) -6.4% `3ky Manager 381,879 377,768 284,307 436,733 477,657 691,203 467,026 430,029 36,997 7.9% Municipal Court-Operations 257,298 462,596 718,988 791,662 1,210,569 797,197 921,687 (124,490) -15.6% Vlanagement Services 1,026,335 1,113,396 1,006,401 1,096,967 1,111,631 2,005,360 1,294,546 1,129,970 164,576 12.7% `3ivit/Criminal Legal Services 1,047,339 823,405 811,632 ~ 764,384 775,259 1,448,586 961,809 767,624 194,184 20.2% ,3omm. Development Svcs 1,725,566 1,942,334 1,918,060 , 1,930,841 1,863,504 3.662,187 2,373,019 2,181,511 191,508 8.1% =olice Services 7,245,619 7,837,644 8,314,556 8,764,346 9,115,696 15,572,132 10,137,890 9,903,984 233,906 2.3% Jail Services 544,061 915,922 937,984 824,672 647,733 1,342,000 805,199 706,032 99,167 12.3% :~arks and Recreation 1,863,748 2,011,509 2,037,708 I 2,063,559 2,061,665 4,041,628 2,684,885 2,319,756 365,129 I 13.6% 3ublic Works 2,080,328 1,959,645 1,930,279 2,025,906 2,268,803 4,090,497 2,552,797 2,192,916 359.881 ~ 14.15 .3ky Overlay Program 450,794 1,030,017 1,248,918 258,610 1,291,751 2,379,347 1,429,827 1,429,827 - ~ 0.0% Solid Waste 174,703 151,404 188,078 221,394 193,834 420,855 267,907 186,148 81,758 . 30.5% -Iotel/Motel Lodging Tax - I 40.424 11,303 72,606 311,797 54,078 54,078 0.0°.4 ISurface Water Management 884,691 1,030.503 1,073,100 1,048,385 1,138,181 2,198,152 1,405,602 1,289,564 116,03~ 8.3% IDebt Service 1,040,824 2,267,244 2,253,288 2,265,545 2,230,177 15,630,394 2,341,877 2,341,877-- 0.00.4 3ureas Bay Centre 258,711 315,482 321,412 388,994 336,235 493,786 328,432 331,667 (3,235) -1.0% Knutzen Family Theatre 69, 298 117,030 103,887 100,156 177,050 99,059 118,156 ( 19,097 - 19.3% Tota Operating Expenditures 18,882,81; 22,254,032 23,102,182 23,089,314 24,679,836 55,935,594 28,208,421 26,525,290 1',683,131 6.0% :Operating Revenues overl(under) Operating Expenditures 5,104,101 3,841,615 3,719,830 4,494,681 3,469,032 (9.851,348) 903,771 2,424,841 1,621,070 168.3% Other Financing Sources 2,347,802 2,332,378 2,706,153 4,953,822 4,488,727 16,055,663 12,492,294 12,492,294 0.0% Other Financing Uses 5,232,423 4,322,158 4,276,722 9,016,865 8,125,628 20,860,788 15,818,454 15,818,454 0.0~ '~l~ding Fund Balance Solid Waste 206,232 273,047 230,142 247,647 267,379 71,971 182,626 n/a { n/a Arterial Street 1,640,449 1,411,641 1,t10,886 1,682,419 1,259,494 0 821,477 n/a rt/a Utility Tax 1,748,541 3,435,324 4,896,519 3,845,764 5,646,879 31 - I 0 n/a n/a Snow & Ice Removal 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 100,000 n/a n/a Surface Water Management 1,849,241 793,111 1,520,426 (72,012) (176,134) 992,700 170,172 n/a n/a Path & Trails 8,422 17,648 28,049 38,543 46,618 60,892 57,794 n/a n/a Strategic Reserve 2,029,993 2,005,408 2,059,491 2,160,794 n/a n/a Debt Service 4,627,850 4,537,723 3,684,190 7,716,235 6,607,734 3,872,572 ' 14,295,680 n/a n/a Dumas Bay Centre Operations ( 14,164) 18,875 1,112 9,012 403 ( 19,909) I 3,812 n/a n/a Knutzen Family Theatre 30,256 72,685 52,315 49,956 62,951 ' 41,089 n/a n/a Police 390,409 439,699 317,066 605,119 564,785 428,280 - ' 500,679 n/a n/a P3 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 n/a n/a Interfund Loans 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 30,500 n/a n/a 9/24/20033:11 PM 03 MFR TABLESSUMMARY ~0 CITY OF Federal Way MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Via: Subject: September 17, 2003 Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee Tho Kraus, Finance Manager David Moseley, City Manager Vouchers Action Requested: Accept the vouchers and forward to the Next Council meeting for approval. committee Member Il k:\fin~acctspay~checkrun~nfr cover.doc MEETING DATE: September 23, 2003 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: VOUCHERS CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: [] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE [] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $2,448,338.21 $2,448,338.21 $ ATTACHMENTS: VOUCHER LIST SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the City of Fed~ to authenticate and certify said claims. Ma~l'~fi~ Services ~ CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Approve attached vouchers pursuant to RCW 42.24 PROPOSED MOTION: I move approval of Vouchers. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: [] APPROVED [] OECD [] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION [] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED - 05/10/2001 COUNCIL BILL # 1sT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # apChkLst 08~26~2003 1:45:09PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: I Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor Invoice 174627 08/25/2003 002024 Voucher: 174627 174628 08/25/2003 000302 Voucher: 174628 174629 08/25/2003 005571 Voucher: 174629 174630 08/25/2003 003649 Voucher: 174630 174631 08/25/2003 003303 Voucher: 174631 174632 08/25/2003 000063 Voucher: 174632 174633 08/25/2003 005318 Voucher: 174633 174634 08/25/2003 007612 Voucher: 174634 174635 08/25/2003 003534 Voucher: 174635 174636 08/25/2003 002477 Voucher: 174636 174637 08/25/2003 007613 Voucher: 174637 174638 08/25/2003 003355 Voucher: 174638 174639 08/25/2003 006400 Voucher: 174639 174640 08/25/2003 004356 Voucher: 174640 174641 08/25/2003 005253 Voucher: 174641 174642 08/25/2003 005254 Voucher: 174642 174643 08/25/2003 000061 Voucher: 174643 PETTY CASH-WITNESS FEES AUG 2003 KING COUNTY RECORDS&EL 02-0052877 ALLEN, LYNETTE ARBUTHNOT, STEVEN BIRD, KRISTA EMPL REIMB EMPL REIMB EMPL REIMB CORPORATE EXPRESS OFF 12036338 DEYO, DARLENE DRAKE, WILLIAM E HALL, PAM HOME DEPOT MERGEL, SHERYL MURPHY, CARY PARKER, TAMI SUMPTER, KYLE U S BANCORP U S BANCORP EMPL REIMB EMPL REIMB EMPL REIMB 7031628 9031238 EMPL REIMB EMPL REIMB EMPL REIMB EMPL REIMB JULY 2003 JULY 2003 WA STATE REVENUE DEPAR 601-223-5385 Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid Check Total 08/21/2003 MSF-REIM WITNESS FUND P 08/25/2003 CD-KC RECORDING FEE 08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN 08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN 08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN 07/31/2003 JULY OFFICE SUPPLIES-COR 08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN 08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN 08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN 07/09/2003 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 07/07/2003 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINTENAN 08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN 08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN 08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN 08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN 08/06/2003 CITY VISA CHARGES FOR (J 08/06/2003 PS-CITY VISA CHARGES FO 08/20/2003 MSF-REMIT SALES/USE TAX 467.77 467.77 96.00 96.00 228.46 228.46 7.91 7.91 406.85 406.85 2,715.61 2,715.61 48.15 48.15 165.62 165.62 515.09 515.09 39.06 16.10 55.16 172.37 172.37 72.30 72.30 28.18 28.18 39.02 39.02 4,316.41 4,316.41 1,766.80 1,766.80 4,024.61 4,024.61 Page: I apChkLst 08/2612003 1:45:09PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 2 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid Check Total 174644 08/25/2003 003521 Voucher: 174644 WILSON, GREG EMPL REIMB 08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN 315.60 Sub total for us bank: 315.60 15,441.91 Page: 2 apChkLst 08~26~2003 1:45:09PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 3 18 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 15,441.91 Page: 3 fi- apChkLst 08129/2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 1 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor Invoice 174645 08/26/2003 007385 Voucher: 174645 174646 08/26/2003 007385 Voucher: 174646 174647 08/27/2003 003464 Voucher: 174647 174648 08/27/2003 007238 Voucher: 174648 174649 08/29/2003 000332 Voucher: 174649 174650 08/29/2003 007583 Voucher: 174650 -~ 174651 08/29/2003 000109 Voucher: 174651 174652 08/29/2003 007318 Voucher: 174652 174653 08/29/2003 000475 Voucher: 174653 174654 08/29/2003 007166 Voucher: 174654 174655 08/29/2003 001285 Voucher: 174655 174656 08/29/2003 003427 Voucher: 174656 174657 08/29/2003 003129 Voucher: 174657 174658 08/29/2003 005501 Voucher: 174658 174659 08/29/2003 001378 Voucher: 174659 174660 08/29/2003 006211 Voucher: 174660 GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTG 982004776 GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTG 982004776 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR CO797820 0045 PETTY CASH: JURY FEES AUGUST/03 ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS I 0065793-1N 0881718-1N ACROPRINT TIME RECORDE 0000046386 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL 13320 ADVANCED SAFETY & FIRE S 105938 ALARM CENTERS/CUSTOM S ALLEN, KAREN ALPINE PRODUCTS INC AMERICAN LOCKER SECURI AMS LASER SUPPLY ANDREWS, AMY APPLIED INDUSTRIAL AQUATECHNEX, INC. 291052 7/23/2003 TM-58405 443212 343946 260968CR 260969 8/5/O3 8/19/03 CA 30632FW 40281805 289 Inv Date Descril~tion 07/16/2003 08/18/2003 08/27/2003 08/27/2003 07~30~2003 07/23/2003 07/21/2003 07/30/2003 08/18/2003 07/20/2003 07/23/2003 08/12/2003 07/19/2003 08/08/2003 08/01/2003 08/05/2003 08/05/2003 08/19/2003 08/19/2003 08/1412003 08/14/2003 MORTGATE PYMT PARAGO MORTGATE PYMT PARAGO PWSCIP-ROW STLMT 02-2 PETTY CASH- JURY FEES LAW-MONTHLY SRV. CHRG / LAW-MONTHLY SRV. CHRG / PS-RIBBON:OFFICE TIME ST PKM-GRD MTN LocKSMITH PS-MAINTENANCE:FIRE EXT PKCHB-ALRM MNTR SVC AU PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C PWS-SURVEYORS VEST XX PS-POLICE RIFLE CABINET R MSDP-PRINTER TONER- MS/PS-PRINTER TONER- MS/PS-PRINTER TONER- INTERPRETER SVCS INTERPRETER SVCS INTERPRETER SVCS PS-FINGERPRINT SUPPLIES AG03-55:2003 ST LK AQUATI Amount Paid 48,429.50 48,429.50 13,141.00 468.48 96.00 5.00 37.18 27.74 54.40 103.00 25.00 59.84 27.70 382.76 -71.75 -71.75 60.00 50.00 40.00 212.64 979.20 Check Total 48,429.50 48,429.50 13,141.00 468.48 101.00 37.18 27.74 54.40 103.0O 25.00 59.84 27.70 239.26 150.00 212.64 979.20 Page: I apChkLst 08129/2003 10:22:05AM Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Invoice Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid Page: 2 Check Total 174661 08/29/2003 002534 Voucher: 174661 174662 08/29/2003 005715 Voucher: 174662 174663 08/29/2003 005718 Voucher: 174663 174664 08/29/2003 000437 Voucher: 174664 174665 08/29/2003 000075 Voucher: 174665 174666 08/29/2003 000075 Voucher: 174666 174667 08/29/2003 000575 Voucher: 174667 174668 08/29/2003 007615 Voucher: 174668 174669 08129/2003 000004 Voucher: 174669 174670 08/29/2003 002386 Voucher: 174670 174671 08/29/2003 000792 Voucher: 174671 174672 08/29/2003 007588 Voucher: 174672 174673 08/29/2003 007538 Voucher: 174673 174674 08/29/2003 004158 Voucher: 174674 174675 08/29/2003 005645 Voucher: 174675 ARBORSCAN INC 3464 ARCH WIRELESS HOLDINGS IM6163838H ARCHITECREATION INC MSC-03-0347 ASSOCIATED COURIERS INC 293777 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES I 20405718 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES I 26837633 ATTORNEYS' INFORMATION E55396 AUTOZONE INC 02-50394 AWC-ASSOC OF WASHINGT 6254 2003 PFCS BANH EGYI / PAWLAK, SUSAN 8/18/03 BARRY'S TRUCKING & LAND BELL, 'CAROL D BELMORE MOBILE HOME PA BERNER, ILYA S BERTUCCI, MICHAEL 8/21/03 8/22/03 212003 21 O467 212005 210468 210469 212004 EMPL REIMB 03-01-091-33 8/18/03 EMPLO REMIB 08/06/2003 08/02/2003 08/05/2003 07/28/2003 08/02/2003 08/12/2003 07/31/2003 08~20/2003 07/30/2003 08/22/2003 08/18/2003 08/21/2003 08/22/2003 08/05/2003 07/28/2003 08/05/2003 07/28/2003 07/28/2003 08/05/2003 08/06/2003 07/16/2003 08/18/2003 08/12/2003 PKMT/TREE PRUNING;~ MSTEL-PAGER LEASE 8131 PKM-TOT sWiNGS CDB - COURIER PLANS FOR MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME~ MSTEL~CELL AIR TIME~ LAW-AUG 03 MEMBERSHIP PW-REFUND BOND REL#02 MSF-2003 BUDGT & FISCAL MSHR-'03 POLICE/FIRE COM INTERPRETER SERVICES INTERPRETER SERVICES INTERPRETER SERVICES AG02-79:LANDSCAPING AND AG02-79:LANDSCAPING AND DBC-DEBRIS REMOVAL SER AG02-79:LANDSCAPING AND AG02-79:LANDSCAPING AND AG02-79:LANDSCAPING AND PRCS-MISC CRAFT SUPPLIE MSR-DAMAGE FENCE LST D INTERPRETER SERVICES PS-REIMB:UNIFORM BOOT A 212.16 1,098.30 250.24 17.60 1,019.20 26.00 24.50 1,634.00 145.00 85.00 227.50 202.50 87.50 930.24 620.16 571.20 554.88 489.60 413.44 73.11 367.74 320.00 104.98 212.16 1,098.30 250.24 17.60 1,019.20 26.00 24.50 1,634.00 230.00 517.50 3,579.52 73.11 367.74 320.00 104.98 Page: 2 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 3 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174676 08/29/2003 003440 BILL HATCH SPORTS Voucher: 174676 90350-00 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 07/31/2003 PRCS-ATHLETIC SUPPLIES/ 439.40 439.40 Page: 3 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) 174678 08/29/2003 001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO I Voucher: 174678 Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Invoice Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid 314593 305538 3O6594 313996 285505 315538 315951 316437 314281 315965 315142 314032 311578 314593-01 311520 316363 315142-01 312343 316361 316360 316365 316232 295368 315434 315961 316364 316367 316596 316154 316155 316366 315403 316597 316359 311003 07~30~2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. 07/11/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. 07/11/2003 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 07/30/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. 04/16/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. 08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 08/05/2003-PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 08/06/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 07/25/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. 08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 07/30/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. 07/30/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. 07/17/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. 08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 07/30/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. 08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 07/18/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. 08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 08/06/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 04/08/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. 07/31/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. 08/04/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. 08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 08/06/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 08/04/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. 08/04/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. 08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 08/06/2003 PS, UNIFORM & ACCES. 08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 07/03/2003 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 762.47 652.80 652.80 417.47 416.16 328.14 261.01 261.01 246.38 234.90 234.90 231.58 194.64 173.64 146.83 141.39 117.45 116.04 107.56 103.25 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 95.69 95.69 95.69 95.69 95.69 94.06 85.08 76.01 76.00 65.28 Page: 4 Check Total Page: 4 apChkLst 08~29/2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 5 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174679 08/29/2003 000007 Voucher: 174679 BOISE OFFICE SOLUTIONS 293467 312117 312406 313302 313055 313996-01 316368 314890 300951-02 316259 020936 018239 204458 896279 228775 050028 .022123 131119 076389 179059 240270 981899 774301 084546 904055 1141962 022760 759979 906939 926266 084547 129957 131027 074755 Inv Date 03/28/2003 07/31/2003 07/17/2003 07/18/2003 08/05/2003 08/05/2003 08/05/2003 07/31/2003 07/31/2003 08/06/2003 07/16/2003 07/16/2003 07/30/2003 07/08/2003 07/31/2003 07/18/2003 07/16/2003 O7/24/20O3 07/21/2003 07/28/2003 07/31/2003 07/14/2003 06/26/2003 07/21/2003 07/08/2003 07/24/20O3 07/16/2003 06/25/2003 07/08/2003 07/09/2003 07/24/2003 07/24/2003 07/24/2003 07/21/2003 Description PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS. PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03) Amount Paid 58.43 52.17 47.82 21.71 20.67 20.67 14.04 10.87 7.18 7.07 245.99 169.85 143.57 135.86 60.87 60.81 55.16 52.06 44.83 35.85 33.43 26.09 23.94 16.80 15.87 10.95 6.66 4.90 4.12 4.12 3.06 2.73 -14.10 -44.83 Check Total 7,435.93 1,098.59 Page: 5 apChkLst 08129/2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 6 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174680 08/29/2003 007623 Voucher: 174680 174681 08/29/2003 007519 Voucher: 174681 174682 08/29/2003 007624 Voucher: 174682 174683 08/29/2003 000414 Voucher: 174683 174684 08/29/2003 000991 Voucher: 174684 174685 08/29/2003 003093 Voucher: 174685 174686 08/29/2003 005622 Voucher: 174686 174687 08/29/2003 006744 Voucher: 174687 174688 08/29/2003 002472 Voucher: 174688 174689 08/29/2003 000142 Voucher: 174689 174690 08/29/2003 005817 Voucher: 174690 174691 08/29/2003 007586 Voucher: 174691 174692 08/29/2003 003752 Voucher: 174692 174693 08/29/2003 004395 Voucher: 174693 BROWN, JONATHAN 133407 BUSINESS INTERNET SERVI 8642 BYERS, DAWN 133408 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING IN 7148 CASCADE COFFEE INC 20342247 CASCADE COMPUTER MAIN 9073692 CHELAN COUNTY TREASURE450001-00064 CHOU, DONG JUN DONG CHOU CHURCH COUNCIL OF SEAT 2003 DIRECT CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE CITY OF FIFE CITY OF SEATTLE CK~2050 CK#2058 CK¢2059 0000668 0000695 AG03-150 COASTWlDE SUPPLY DBA CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICA T1247706 T1242619 T1236806-1 W1242473 T1244654-1 W123344-1 W1243344 0220-423433 0220-423763 Inv Date Description Amount Paid 08/19/2003 PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D 50.00 6,500.00 50.00 355.24 95.42 625.60 7,152.00 461.40 140.00 08/14/2003 MIS-CITY WEB REDESIGN S~ 08/19/2003 PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D 08/26/2003 CM-JAPENSE DELEGATION E 08/11/2003 MSM&D-MTG COFFEE SUPP 08/11/2003 MSDP-PRINTER MAINT 06/05/2003 PS-JAIL SERVICES MAY 2003 08/20/2003 EMPLOYEE EXPENSES REI 08/19/2003 PKDBC-AD:2003 CHURCH CC 07/16/2003 08~1/2003 08/21/2003 06/16/2003 07/02/2003 06/12/2003 PS-TRVL EXP:WSLEFIA CON PW-TRVL EXP:APWA CONF ( PW-TRVL EXP:APWA CONF ( PS-JAIL SERVICES 5/03 PS-JAIL SERVICES 6/03 AG03-150:REINVESTING IN Y 359.84 159.00 159.00 19,530.00 19,089.00 5,000.00 08/13D003 07/31~003 08/04~003 07/31~003 08/07~003 08/12/2003 08/07~003 08/04~003 08/12~003 PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLI PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL PKDBC-HOUSEHOLD SUPPL MC-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES~ PRCS-KJP JANITORIAL SUP PKCP-HOUSEHOLD SUPPLI PKCP-HOUSEHOLD SUPPLI PRCS-EMERG LITE BATTER PKMCHB-LIGHTING SUPPLI 218.81 201.17 87.02 80.54 68.7.0 12.35 12.35 150.27 41.78 Check Total 50.00 6,500.00 50.00 355.24 95.42 625.60 7,152.00 461.40 140.00 677.84 38,619.00 5,000.00 68O.94 192.05 Page: 6 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 7 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174694 08/29/2003 002790 Voucher: 174694 174695 08/29/2003 004530 Voucher: 174695 174696 08/29/2003 007579 Voucher: 174696 174697 08/29/2003 000854 Voucher: 174697 174698 08/29~003 000939 Voucher: 174698 174699 08/29~003 007397 Voucher: 174699 174700 08D9/2003 007584 Voucher: 174700 174701 08/29/2003 000438 Voucher: 174701 174702 08/29/2003 006156 Voucher: 174702 174703 08~9~003 005341 Voucher: 174703 174704 08/29/2003 007548 Voucher: 174704 174705 08/29~003 005048 Voucher: 174705 174706 08/29/2003 005620 Voucher: 174706 CONSTRUCTION TESTING L CWA CONSULTANTS D & M PLUMBING INC D J TROPHY DANONE WATERS OF NORT DAVID A CLARK ARCHITECT DECATUR ELECTRONICS DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE J DESTINATION WIRELESS DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA DOXTATER & COMPANY LLC DUPONT FLOORING SYSTE DUTTON PROMOTIONAL AD 9597 03-271 1107100420 00211491 5276416-15 5277089-15 5276414-15 5276424-15 4956834-15 5276412-15 195 00112867 00112980CR 3737 10347 10460 6/24/03 8/12/03 8/18/03 8/15/03 8/19/03 071603 4358-052 19048 Inv Date 08/18/2003 08/01/2003 07/30D003 07/18/2003 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 06/30/2003 07/01/2003 08/18/2003 08/05/2003 08/08/2003 08/06/2003 08/01/2003 08/18D003 06D4~003 08/12/2003 08/18/2003 08/15/2003 08/19/2003 07/16/2003 07/16~003 07D2/2003 DescriDtion Amount Paid PWAD-MATERIALS TESTING 413.40 270.00 369.92 197.55 CDB - PLAN REVIEW SERVIC PKDBC-PLUMBING REPAIRS PRCS-BLACK MARBLE BASE PKCHB-WTR/CL RNTL ACC PKM-WTR/CLR RNTL ACCT PKDBC-WTR/CL RNTL ACCT MC-WATER/CLR RNTL ACC PKKFT-WTR/CL RNTL ACCT# PKCP-WTR/CLR RNTL ACCT~ AG03-51 :PARAGON BLDG-DU 268.08 152.75 109.65 52.00 17.41 6.53 33,860.29 PS-GENESIS GHS RADARS: Freight LUNCH FOR INTERAGENCY F 1,798.62 -30.00 134.44 PS-QTRMASTER PHONE REF PS-PHONE REPAIR SERVIC INTERPRETER SERVICES INTERPRETER SERVICES INTERPRETER SERVICES INTERPRETER SERVICES INTERPRETER SERVICES AG03-66:EVENTS PLANNING 35.00 25.00 140.00 90.00 90.00 80.00 80.00 15,000.00 PKDBC-CARPET CLEANING~ 656.36 CM-NEW CITY LOGO LAPEL 837.21 Check Total 413.40 270.00 369.92 197.55 606.42 33,860.29 1,768.62 134.44 60.00 480.00 15,000.00 656.36 837.21 Page: 7 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 8 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 174707 08/29/2003 000570 Voucher: 174707 174708 08/29/2003 007621 Voucher: 174708 174709 08/29/2003 007585 Voucher: 174709 174710 08/29/2003 007540 Voucher: 174710 174711 08/29/2003 000343 Voucher: 174711 174712 08/29/2003 005639 Voucher: 174712 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE EALY, PATRICE (1028371 1027988 1028039 1O28487 1028519 1027993 1028038 1027154 1028477 1028493 1027031 1027987 1027922 1028180 1028418 1028242 1028505 1028518 1O28529 1028536 1028152 1028274 1028594 1028298 1028428 131967 EARTH TECH ENTERPRISES 10729035 0729035 ELECTROTECHNICS CORPOF0033860-1N ELEPHANT CAR WASH 200 ELLINGTON, THOMAS MARK 8/7/03 8/15/03 08/04/2003 07/16/2003 07/18/2003 08/08/2003 08/09/2003 07/16/2003 07/18/2003 06~09~2003 08/08/2003 08/08/2003 06~03~2003 07/16/2003 07/14/2003 07/25/2003 08/05/2003 07/29/2003 08/09/2003 08/09/2003 08/09/2003 08/09/2003 07/24/2003 07/30/2003 08/12/2003 07/31/2003 08/06/2003 08/11/2003 08/01/2003 08/01/2003 07/03/2003 07/31/2003 09/07/2003 08/15~003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/TlR PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/TlR MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/TlR MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/TlR MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/TlR PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C AG03-145:LNDSCP MTN (PA AG03-145:LNDSCP MTN (PA PW/TR-SCHOOL FLASHERS- PS-CAR WASH SERVICE JUL PROTEMJUDGE PRO TEMJUDGE 632.24 422.79 368.61 272.17 232.97 165.59 165.59 147.10 138.67 92.34 87.67 83.18 82.79 80.07 57.63 28.84 27.19 27.19 27.19 27.19 24.47 18.49 18.49 13.32 13.32 38.40 436.28 309.73 1,320.00 829.12 200.00 125.00 3,255.10 38.40 746.01 1,320.00 829.12 325.00 Page:8 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 9 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174713 08/29/2003 007283 Voucher: 174713 174714 08/29/2003 002887 Voucher: 174714 174715 08/29/2003 001046 Voucher: 174715 174716 08/29/2003 007632 Voucher: 174716 174717 08/29/2003 000328 Voucher: 174717 174718 08/29/2003 004840 Voucher: 174718 174719 08~9/2003 001748 Voucher: 174719 174720 08/29/2003 007082 Voucher: 174720 174721 08/29/2003 001297 Voucher: 174721 174722 08/29~003 000217 Voucher: 174722 174723 08/29/2003 000229 Voucher: 174723 EMERALD AIRE INC 44436 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 90600928 EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMAT17004341 ERB, WILLIAM ERB ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE EVERSON'S ECONO-VAC INC EXPANETS 0137761 0138978 0138977 102325 102113 102333 102332 10231'6 102356 102371 102091 102354 101934CR 023561 022930-A 20488193 FACILITY MAINTENANCE CO 135-008 138-007 137-008 134-008 136-008 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPOR4-846-20941 FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER CO2352 Inv Date Description Amount Paid 08/01/2003 CITYHALL-HVAC SERVICES- 130.56 656.00 21.76 20.00 07/24/2003 MSDP-HP 8150 MAINTENANC 07/24/2003 PS-CREDIT REPORTS JUNE; 05/20/2003 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/19-20/2 07/31/2003 08/15/2003 08/15/2003 07/18/2003 05/14/2003 07~1/2003 07/21/2003 07/14/2003 07~5/2003 07/30/2003 05/08/2003 07~5/2003 07/14/2003 08/11/2003 06/30/2003 08/04/2003 PS-MISC PS-MISC PS-MISC PS-MISC PS-MISC PS-MISC PS-MISC PS-MISC PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES (7/ PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES (8/ MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLES PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES REPAIR/SUPPLIES REPAIR/SUPPLIES REPAIR/SUPPLIES REPAIR/SUPPLIES REPAIR/SUPPLIES REPAIR/SUPPLIES REPAIR/SUPPLIES REPAIR/SUPPLIES PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES AG03-75:SWM INFRASTRUC'I AG03-75:CORRECTION OF I MIS-PBX MAINT FOR 7/31-8 5,668.32 5,465.14 2,468.99 2,395.45 315.52 191.49 191.49 89.22 65.28 65.28 32.64 23.94 -63.10 6,463.39 0.80 1,529.12 08/15~003 07/15~003 08/15~003 08/15/2003 08/15D003 08/08~003 AG01-59A:PKS LNDSCP MNT AG01-52A:DBC LNDSCP SVC AG01-59A:PKS LNDSCP MNT AG01-59A:PKS LNDSCP MNT AG01-59A:PKS LNDSCP MNT MSDP-DELIVERY SERVICES 848.64 693.07 608.21 480.90 297.04 48.80 06/27/2003 PS-ADVANCING LEADERSHI 650.00 Check Total 130.56 656.00 21.76 20.00 13,602.45 3,307.21 6,464.19 1,529.12 2,927.86 48.80 650.00 Page: 9 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 174724 08/29/2003 000285 Voucher: 174724 174725 08/29/2003 004270 Voucher: 174725 174726 08/29/2003 001593 Voucher: 174726 174727 08/29/2003 002962 . ' Voucher: 174727 174728 08/29/2003 000989 Voucher: 174728 174729 08/29/2003 002870 Voucher: 174729 ~"'3174730 08/29/2003 004566 Voucher: 174730 ~ 174731.08/29/2003 003699 'Voucher: 174731 174732 08/29/2003 007469 Voucher: 174732 174733 08/29/2003 701910 Voucher: 174733 174734 08/29/2003 000671 Voucher: 174734 174735 08/29/2003 007622 Voucher: 174735 174736 08/29/2003 001487 Voucher: 174736 174737 08/29~003 007625 Voucher: 174737 174738 08/29/2003 003560 Voucher: 174738 174739 08/29/2003 001431 Voucher: 174739 FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPART 8/1/03 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR FEDERAL WAY TOWING INC 004924 004925 LAW SUBSC 16683 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 9065520 FRED MEYER INC 1515740 FREEWAY TRAILER SALES I G&M HONEST PERFORMANC 022830 022825 54957 GARDNER & ASSOCIATES 2838 GRAY & OSBORNE INC 03562.00-3 GUTIERREZ, KRISTINA C H D FOWLER COMPANY HARTEAU, JIM 133411 1334OO 11339129 11344097 11343852 131968 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPA HOEKS, PaUL 34314999. 34341916 34344979 133410 HUNTERS TREE SERVICE 1251 1250 ICON MATERIALS INC 276218 275048 08/01/2003 08/02D003 08/02D003 08/12D003 06~2~003 07/18/2003 08/05/2003 07/03/2003 07/03/2003 08/09/2003 08/14D003 08/04D003 08/19~003 08/19D003 08/06~003 08/14D003 08/14~003 08/11~003 07~9~003 08/03~003 08/04~003 08/19D003 08/07/2003 08/07~003 08/14D003 08~7~003 PKM-FIRE CODE PERMIT/CE CDPL-LEGALS~ CDPL-LEGALS~ LAW-NEWSPAPER suBcRI FILE#03-03-091-262 LOSS DT PS-SUPPLIES:PROPERTY/EV PRKCS-DAY CAMP SUPPLIE PS-STORAGE TRAILER~ MSFLT-VEHICLE REPAIRS/S MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES PS-JR POLICE STICKER BAD~ AG03-56A:51ST AVE SW STO PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D PKM-GD REPAIR/MAINT SUP PKM-GD REPAIR/MAINT SUP PKM-GD REPAIR/MAINT SUP PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C HP DAT72 DDS DATA CARTR MSDP/PS COMPAQ DESKTO HP DAT72 DDS DATA CARTR PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D PWS-REMV TREES,CHIP,C PWS-TREE REMOVAL,CHIP PWS-STREET REPAIR MTN - PWS-STREET REPAIR MTN - 100.00 123.50 103.58 29~00 134.91 315.12 12.88 3,173.70 55.42 68.36 380.00 11,581.11 43.40 6.60 373.40 364.91 234.62 72.45 8,908.54 5,065.73 617.98 50.00 2,067.20 1,958.40 849.28 629.35 100.00 256.08 134.91 315.12 12.88 3,229.12 68.36 380.00 11,581.11 50.00 972.93 72.45 14,592.25 50.00 4,025.60 1,478.63 Page: 10 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 11 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174740 08/29/2003 000016 Voucher: 174740 174741 08/29/2003 007590 Voucher: 174741 174742 08/29/2003 005691 Voucher: 174742 174743 08/29/2003 001240 Voucher: 174743 174744 08/29/2003 005231 Voucher: 174744 ~74745 08~9/2003 005128 Voucher: 174745 174746 08/29/2003 003211 Voucher: 174746 174747 08D9/2003 005656 Voucher: 174747 174748 08/29/2003 004096 Voucher: 174748 174749 08/29/2003 007157 Voucher: 174749 174750 08/29/2003 003462 Voucher: 174750 174751 08/29/2003 005934 Voucher: 174751 174752 08D9/2003 002010 Voucher: 174752 174753 08/29/2003 000029 Voucher: 174753 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS IN THE LINE OF DUTY INC 16387905 1644707A 1666026A C02674 INLAND PACIFIC STAMPS & 0471114 INRO CONSULTANTS INC 16131 lOS CAPITAL INC 59521744 IRELAND NEEDLECRAFT INC 2918 IRON MOUNTAIN/SAFESITE I H379274 JIM'S DETAIL SHOP 1116 F 11107 F 11103 F JOHNSON CHRISTIE ANDRE 7324 7323 7322 7321 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATI0014906 JUNKER, RYAN EMPL REIMB K P TRANSLATION SERVICE 8/12&8/13/03 7/29/03 7/22/03 8/15/03 KCM INC 140321 KING BELLMARK OF PUGET ~c025160 Inv Date Descri~3tion Amount Paid 08/05D003 07/03/2003 08/13/2003 07/29D003 MSDP FAX MACHINES MAIN MSDP/PK-KJP: PRINTER TO FREIGHT-DBC CANON TONE PS-TRAINING TAPE-IN THE L 199.25 184.96 16.31 95.00 07/17/2003 CDB- RUBBER STAMPS FO 146.21 540.00 2,628.21 266.00 1,334.21 08/01/2003 MSDP/PW-EMME2 SOF'I'WAR 07/28/2003 MSMD-COPIER RENTAL (8 08/06/2003 MUNICIPAL JUDGE CLOTHIN 07/31/2003 MSC-RECORDS STORAGE S 08/05~003 07~4~003 07/18~003 08/05/2003 08/05/2003 08/05/2003 08/05~003 07/11~003 PS-DETAIL SVCS #650 PS-DETAIL SVCS #505 PS-DETAIL SVCS #630 AG00-60B:PS LEGAL SVCS(4 AG00-60B:PS LEGAL SVCS(3 AG00-60B:PS LEGAL SVCS(4 AG00-60B:PS LEGAL SVCS(5 AG02-136:POTENTIAL ANNE~ 139.99 139.00 139.00 1,689.50 1,372.50 137.00 107.50 8,001.96 07/31/2003 PS-REIMB:WATER:SIMUNITI 58.86 08/14/2003 08/01~003 08/01/2003 08/15/2003 08/07/2003 TRANSLATION SERVICES TRANSLATION SERVICES TRANSLATION SERVICES TRANSLATION SERVICES AG03-48:LAKOTA WETLAND I 209.00 184.50 104.50 104.50 23,574.02 08/14/2003 CDB - MK MARTIN SIGNATUR 35.51 Check Total 4O0.52 95.00 146.21 540.00 2,628.21 266.00 1,334.21 417.99 3,306.50 8,001.96 58.86 602.50 23,574.02 35.51 Page:11 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 12 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174754 08D9/2003 005568 Voucher: 174754 174755 08~9/2003 007332 Voucher: 174755 174756 08D9D003 000201 Voucher: 174756 174757 08D9/2003 003374 Voucher: 174757 174758 08~9~003 003399 Voucher: 174758 ~'~.i74759 08/29/2003 000096 Voucher: 174759 174760 08D9/2003 001939 Voucher: 174760 174761 08~9~003 004052 Voucher: 174761 174762 08/29/2003 005668 Voucher: 174762 174763 08/29/2003 007050 Voucher: 174763 174764 08/29/2003 007599 Voucher: 174764 174765 08/29/2003 000630 Voucher: 174765 KING COUNTY FLEET ADM D1201905 KING COUNTY PARKS DIVIS 14336 KINKO'S INC, ACCOUNT #020 KLINGELE, BRYAN KVASNYUK, NIKOLAY LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRI LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 515100069299 515100069300 515100069301 515100069359 515100069304 ANTHROPOLO ANTHROPOLG 8/5 &8/12/03 8115&8119103 3200201 2984001 2832301 0014290 LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIP LAW OFFICES OF DESMOND 08110301 08090302 08050303 07180302 JUlY 2003 LAW OFFICES OF HAL GEIE 18 LITTLE, LORRAINE 133406 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC 66142 66206 66094 66095 66005 66004 Inv Date 08/11~003 O7/08/2OO3 08/13~003 08/13D003 08/13D003 08/19D003 08/13~003 06~0D003 08/12D003 08/15~003 08~0~003 08/19~003 08/11~003 08/11~003 07/31/2003 08/11~003 08/08~003 08/05~003 07/14~003 07/31~003 08/15/2003 08/19~003 07/31/2003 08/05/2003 07/28/2003 07/26/2003 07/21/2003 07/24/2003 Description Amount Paid PWS-MATERIALS/SUPPLIES, 1,250.60 348.00 PRCS-SPECIAL OLY-FEDERA MSCK-PRINTING SERVICES PS-PRINTING SERVICES PS-PRINTING SERVICES PVVST-PRINTING SERVICES PVVST-PRINTING SERVICES MSHR-EDUC ASSNT/TUITI PS-POLICE BUSINESS REIM DISTRICT COURT INTERPRE DISTRICT COURT INTERPRE PWS-WATER SVCS~ PKM-FAC/VVATER SVCS PKM-FAC/VVATER SVCS AG 02-11 A: SWM-G EOTEC H N I 452.87 184.21 81.60 12.36 9.79 542.20 389.71 110.00 110.00 221.14 16.74 14.48 3,431.74 PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT AG01-62B:PUBLIC DEFENSE 285.22 142.80 137.09 22.68 750.00 AG02-125:PUBLIC DEFENDEF 23,382.50 PKRCS-REFUND RENTAL DE 40.00 PKM-STONE/GRAVEL SUPPL PKM-STONE/GRAVEL SUPPL PKM-STONE/GRAVEL SUPPL PKM-STONE/GRAVEL SUPPL PWS-DUMP CLEAN CONCRE PWS-MEDIUM BARK~ 619.59 472.19 358.46 131.70 110.57 14.63 Check Total 1,250.60 348.00 740.83 931.91 220.00 252.36 3,431.74 587.79 750.00 23,382.50 40.00 1,707.14 Page: 12 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 13 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 174766 08/29/2003 007221 Voucher: 174766 174767 08/29/2003 004431 Voucher: 174767 174768 08/29/2003 007331 Voucher: 174768 174769 08/29/2003 000960 Voucher: 174769 174770 08/29/2003 004881 Voucher: 174770 174771 08/29/2003 000370 Voucher: 174771 174772 08/29/2003 004182 Voucher: 174772 174773 08/29/2003 007626 Voucher: 174773 174774 08/29/2003 000286 Voucher: 174774 174775 08/29/2003 001793 Voucher: 174775 174776 08/29/2003 006664 Voucher: 174776 174777 08/29/2003 003170 Voucher: 174777 174778 08/29/2003 007501 Voucher: 174778 174779 08/29/2003 007616 Voucher: 174779 174780 08/29/2003 005004 Voucher: 174780 174781 08/29/2003 001843 Voucher: 174781 M&W BUILDING SUP CO INC 8/7/03 8/7/03 MADRONA PLANNING DVLP 00002852 00002851 MAIL ADVERTISING BUREAU 31939 MATTHEW BENDER & COMP 66860423 MCALLESTER, MELANIE MCCLUNG, KATHY MCDONOUGH & SONS INC MELCHIOR, MICHAEL EMPL REIMB 7/29/03 129238 133404 METROCALL WIRELESS INC 00784647 MICROFLEX INC MITCHELL, JAMIE MODERN SECURITY SYSTE MORED, LARNIE OO014426 00014470 BASKETBALL 36553 133401 MORGAN SPENCER & SMITH 02-43290 MORRIS HANSEN ENTERPRI 11585 MORRIS PIHA REAL ESTATE ,~988-SEPT03 985-SEPT03 987-SEPT03 989-SEPT03 2937-SEPT03 08/07/2003 08/07/2003 08/06/2003 08/06/2003 07/01/2003 07/25/2003 08/06/2003 07/29/2003 08/12/2003 08/19/2003 08/01/2003 08/01/2003 08/13/2003 08/06/2003 07/25/2003 08/19/2003 08/18/2003 07/24/2003 08/21/2003 08/21/2003 08/21/2003 08/21/2003 08/21/2003 PKM-PARTIAL PAYMENT TO PKM-CONCRETE/PRE-MIX F CD-EXPR:RAINIER PACIFIC B CD-EXPR:WALGREEN'S DRU CM-MAILING SERVICES FOR LAW-WA APP. RPRTS VOL 1 PS-REIMB: BEV:TRAINING S SUPPLIES FOR EMPLOYEE A AG01-95A:PKNG LOT VACUUI PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D MSTEL-PAGER SVC FOR 8t MSDP/FI-TAXTOOLS SOFTWJ MSA-TAX AUDIT PROGRAM PRCS-BASKETBALL REFERE PKM-ALARM MONITORING S PKRCS-REFUND RENTAL D PW-REFUND BOND REL#00 PKCHB-WINDOW CLEANING AG98-212B:PS BLDG LEASES AG99-139A:MC BLDG LEASE~ AG98-212B:PS BLDG LEASE AG98-212B:PS BLDG LEASE AG93-51:KLCC PARKING LO 14,165.00 720.00 460.20 410.40 1,259.23 21.41 58.46 102.51 261.12 50.00 3.52 1,251.00 53.47 336.00 34.82 30.00 1,756.00 220.00 13,334.60 6,964.00 4,571.40 3,106.00 509.90 14,885.00 870.60 1,259.23 21.41 58.46 102.51 261.12 50.00 3.52 1,304.47 336.00 34.82 30.00 1,756.00 220.00 28,485.90 Page: 13 apChkLst 08/29/2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 14 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid Check Total 174782 08/29/2003 000041 Voucher: 174782 174783 08/29/2003 001902 Voucher: 174783 174784 08/29/2003 005532 Voucher: 174784 174785 08/29/2003 001052 Voucher: 174785 174786 08/29/2003 004426 Voucher: 174786 174787 08/29/2003 003138 Voucher: 174787 174788 08/29/2003 007618 Voucher: 174788 174789 08/29/2003 003529 Voucher: 174789 174790 08/29/2003 007589 Voucher: 174790 174791 08/29/2003 006408 Voucher: 174791 174792 08/29/2003 007444 Voucher: 174792 174793 08/29/2003 000504 Voucher: 174793 174794 08/29/2003 000112 Voucher: 174794 174795 08/29/2003 000315 Voucher: 174795 174796 08/29/2003 005293 Voucher: 174796 MURTOUGH SUPPLY COMPA 183411 MYERS MASTER LAWN CAR 606 605 NACM-NATIONAL ASSOCIATI 4112 NAPA AUTO PARTS NASRO-NATIONAL ASSOCIA NORMED 711409 710955 711222 3481WA 3524WA 12378-418211 O'NEILL PLUMBING CO 03-102231-00 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SE 82679-001 OFFICERS ONLY INCORPORA1440 OLSON, MICHAEL EMPL REIMB ORCA PACIFIC INC ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER 006948 006778 006463 006777 02228 PACIFIC COAST FORD INC 264686 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE PEOPLE'S TRANSLATION SE ~538617 538618 480980 3262 3276 08/08/2003 08/01~003 08/01D003 08/05/2003 08/06/2003 08/04D003 08/05D003 07~1/2003 08/14/2003 07/17~003 08/14~003 07/31/2003 07/25/2003 08/18D003 08/06/2003 08/06/2003 07/21/2003 08/06/2003 06/02/2003 08/06D003 07/24/2003 08/06/2003 07~28~2003 08/12/2003 08/14/2003 PS-HOUSEHOLD SUPPLIES AG01-66A:LANDSCAPE MNT ,' AG01-66A:LANDSCAPE MNT ,' MC-MEMBERSHIP GINA HOF MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES PWST-REPAIR & MAINT SU PS-POLICE SEMINAR SERVI PS-POLICE SEMINAR SERVI PS-GLOVES/SAFETY SUPPL CD-REFUND PLUMB PRMT 0 PS-PHYSICAL FIT-FOR-DUTY PS-HANDCUFF RESTRAINTS MSF-LODGING REIMB BUGT. AG03-154:CHEMICAL SVCS~ AG03-154:CHEMICAL SVCS~ AG03-154:CHEMICAL SVCS~ AG03-154:CHEMICAL SVCS~ PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI PS-VEHICLE REPAIRS/MAIN PVVT-MERIDIAN COURT AP PWST-TITLE REPORTS PWST-TITLE REPORTS INTERPRETER SERVICES INTERPRETER SERVICES 96.93 1,853.72 520.15 75.00 49.48 22.50 12.94 425.00 295.00 223.69 44.00 260.00 322.95 196.77 138.34 83.00 75.89 75.89 38.91 475.46 359.04 359.04 359.04 50.00 50.00 96.93 2,373.87 75.00 84.92 720.00 223.69 44.00 260.00 322.95 196.77 373.12 38.91 475.46 1,077.12 100.00 Page: 14 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 15 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174797 08/29/2003 002007 Voucher: 174797 174798 08/29/2003 001189 Voucher: 174798 174799 08/29/2003 001166 Voucher: 174799 174800 08~9~003 007470 Voucher: 174800 174801 08D9/2003 005682 Voucher: 174801 174802 08D9~003 001612 Voucher: 174802 174803 08/29D003 005583 Voucher: 174803 ~-.~174804 08/29/2003 006079 Voucher: 174804  '"~174805 08/29/2003 000051 Voucher: 174805 174806 08/29/2003 005977 Voucher: 174806 174807 08/29/2003 007619 Voucher: 174807 174808 08/29/2003 006860 Voucher: 174808 174809 08/29/2003 000202 Voucher: 174809 PETPRO PRODUCTS INC 30157 PETTY CASH - CM OFFICE PETTY CASH - KLAHANEE PETTY CASH - MGMT. SVC. PLF INC 8990 POLLARD GROUP INC 63028 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER, IN PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC PURE HEALTH SOLUTIONS I PUYALLUP SCHOOL DISTRI QUIGG BROS INC QWEST CM 8/26/03 KLCC 8/22/03 017617 182896 276131N 378-488-6325 109-922-1002 722-288-1000 918-041-1002 319-041-1003 002-141-1004 177-159-1003 699-699-1003 102-141-1002 711-141-1000 31283 C2414 R4845 2O6516 206501 206499 253-Z04-0609 253-815-9920 Inv Date Description Amount Paid 08/11/2003 PKM-PET WASTE DISPOSAB 08/26/2003 PARKING~REIMB FOR PAT R 580.75 288.63 175.75 322.62 323.09 113.58 488.23 52.75 08/22/2003 PRCS-PARKING FOR MT. RA 08/26/2003 CD- 2004 WEEKLY DESK GRE 07/25/2003 PS-PATROL SUPPLIES/EQU 08/13/2003 MSHR-BUSINESS CARDS 08/08/2003 PKM-CUTTING TORCH SUPP 07/22/2003 PS-FINGERPRINT SUPPLIES 08/18/2003 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 07/18/2003 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 08/11/2003 PS- UTLITIES P KM-UTI LITI ES PKM-UTILITIES PKM-UTILITIES PKM-UTILITIES PKM-UTILITIES PKM-UTILITIES PWS-ELECTRICITY CHRGS ~ PKM-UTILITIES P KM-UTI LITI ES PS-BOTTLED WATER SVc 3,016.17 839.68 379.09 320.62 58.86 34.31 21.81 5.85 5.84 5.84 391.68 08/19/2003 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 150.00 08/08/2003 08/04/2003 08/05/2003 08/04/2003 08/04/2003 PWS-ASPHALT 23RD AVE S ~ PWS-MARINE VIEW SAND A PWS-MARINE VIEW SAND A MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 8 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 8 98.63 49.02 45.19 4,762.13 64.30 Check Total 580.75 288.63 175.75 322.62 323.09 113.58 488.23 52.75 4,688.07 391.68 150.00 192.84 4,826.43 Page:15 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 16 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174810 08/29/2003 007521 Voucher: 174810 174811 08/29/2003 006239 Voucher: 174811 174812 08/29/2003 002399 Voucher: 174812 174813 08/29/2003 007627 Voucher: 174813 174814 08/29/2003 005939 Voucher: 174814 174815 08/29/2003 007297 Voucher: 174815 174816 08/29/2003 700320 Voucher: 174816 174817 08/29/2003 007516 Voucher: 174817 174818 08~29/2003 003761 Voucher: 174818 174819 08/29/2003 006441 Voucher: 174819 174820 08/29/2003 000759 Voucher: 174820 174821 08/29/2003 006657 Voucher: 174821 174822 08/29/2003 005703 Voucher: 174822 174823 08/29/2003 007567 Voucher: 174823 174824 08/29/2003 005984 Voucher: 174824 174825 08/29/2003 007628 Voucher: 174825 174826 08/29/2003 007226 Voucher: 174826 RAJUL, MAFE 7/3/03 8/6/03 RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURIN(180409 RECOGNITION PLUS 11618 REIGSTAD, JANICE 133409 RIGHT BRAIN UNLIMITED LL 23628 ROBERTS, BRIAN OPEN HOUSE RODGERS DEU~SCH & TUR 797820 0025 ROXANNE MICHAEL CUST SVC TR ROYAL WALDOCK & ASSOCl 2234 RYAN-CONNELLY, LESLIE NTRL RES EC S & S WORLDWIDE, INC 4350095 S C I INFRASTRUCTURE LLC AG02-58#12 SAFEWAY STORE #3501 SANDWICK, JOLENE SCHOOL DAZE INC SCOTT, ADRIAN SEATAC TRANSMISSION 823692 133812 133813 205864 133402 169456 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 07/03/2003 MC- INTERPRETER SERVICE 08/06/2003 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE 08/05/2003 PS-K9 EQUIPMENT/SUPPLIE 07/02/2003 PRCS-ADULT SOFTBALL TR 08/19/2003 PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D 07/28/2003 PKM-DOG WASTE SUPPLIES 08/05/2003 PWSCIP-PIZZA FOR OPEN H 08/19/2003 PWSCIP-02-2-19486-9 KNT/ 06/25/2003 CDB - cuSTOMER SERVICE ' 06/24/2003 PKMT/BACKFLOW TESTING ,~ 03/24/2003 MSHR-EDUC ASSNT/TUITI 07/29/2003 PRCS-12-FT PARACHUTE 07/20/2003 AG02-58C:PAC HWY S HOV L 08/05/2003 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 08/21/2003 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C 08/21/2003 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C 07/23/2003 PRCS - PRESCHOOL SUPPLII 08/19/2003 PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D 07/30/2003 PS-TRANSMISSION SERVIC 45.00 45.00 90.0O 85.80 85.80 1,272.96 1,272.96 50.00 50.00 336.34 336.34 51.18 51.18 750.00 750.00 300.00 300.00 50.00 50.00 588.80 588.80 32.83 32.83 734,126.47 734,126.47 10.77 10.77 15.00 5.00 20.00 9.63 9.63 50.00 50.00 353.60 353.60 Page: 16 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 17 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 174827 08/29/2003 000055 Voucher: 174827 174828 08/29/2003 000351 Voucher: 174828 174829 08/29/2003 000106 Voucher: 174829 174830 08/29/2003 002231 Voucher: 174830 174831 08/29/2003 001480 Voucher: 174831 174832 08/29/2003 002501 Voucher: 174832 174833 08/29/2003 005497 Voucher: 174833 ~'~174834 08/29/2003 004963 Voucher: 174834 174835 08/29/2003 000723 Voucher: 174835 174836 08/29/2003 000002 Voucher: 174836 174837 08/29/2003 007617 Voucher: 174837 SEATTLE TIMES 073102119 SEATTLE TIMES-SUBSCRIPT SELECT TRAVEL INC SHELDON & ASSOCIATES IN 3O446434 4068O431 307281021 308141000 97122 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 7779-3 SHOPE CONCRETE PRODUC'116259 107985 SKINNER, BILL MILEAGE REIM SOUND PUBLISHING INC 10635 SOUND RESOURCE MGMT G FWA-007 SOUND VIEW AUTO BODY I 1765 SOUTH CAMPUS PLACE LLC 02-42546 08/02/2003 08/05/2003 07/31/2003 07/28/2003 08/14/2003 07/31/2003 08/19/2003 12/23/2002 11/29/2001 08/18/2003 08/05/2003 07/31/2003 07/11/2003 08/11/2003 MSHR-NEWSPAPER AD CM-SEATTLE P-I NEWSPAPE PS-NEWSPAPER SUBCRIPT PS-AIRFARE:ClTY TRAVEL S PS-AIRFARE:VOLUNTEER G CD-ENPR:WETLAND DTMNT PKM-PAINT SUPPLIES PKM-CATCH BASIN/GRATE/ PKM-DPLCT PYM CK#163941 PS-MILEAGE REIMBURSEMEI PKRCS-WINTER QUARTER B AG00-154A:SOL WST/RECY C FILE#03-03-091-262 LOSS DT PW-REFUND BOND REL#00 772.99 39.00 30.55 565.00 300.00 157.50 288.10 234.46 -201.81 99.58 5,970.63 759.24 1,559.64 4,543.00 772.99 69.55 865.00 157.50 288.10 32.65 99.58 5,970.63 759.24 1,559.64 4,543.00 Page: 17 apChkLst 08/29/2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 18 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174838 08/29/2003 001885 Voucher: 174838 174~3~. 08/29/2003 001618 ,~ 40 Voucher: 174839 1748 08/29/2003 005602 Voucher: i 74840 174841 08/2912003 003307 Voucher: 174841 174842 08/29/2003 005921 Voucher: 174842 174843 08/29/2003 005891 Voucher: 174843 174844 08/29/2003 003896 Voucher: 174844 174845 08/29/2003 006414 Voucher: 174845 174846 08/29/2003 000341 Voucher: 174846 174847 08/29/2003 002521 Voucher: 174847 174848 08/29/2003 000873 Voucher: 174848 SPARKS CAR CARE SPEEDY AUTO & WINDOW G 11528 11552 11574 11711 011443 O11470 11729 11734 11735 11724 11749 11753 11745 11623 1052587 SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES 11025 STERICYCLE INC 00023917O2 STL SEATTLE 58012998 SUDDEN IMAGE INC 2993 SUMMIT LAW GROUP 18907 SUMNER VETERINARY HOS SUNRISE SELF STORAGE 249927 250987 313320 SUPERLON PLASTICS INC 03F4281 TARGET STORES DIVISION, All03529324 1103534079 1103537937 Inv Date Description Amount Paid 07/23/2003 07/22/2003 07/24/20O3 08/15/2003 07/07/2003 07/11/2003 08/15/2003 08/15/2003 08/15/2003 08/15/2003 08/18/2003 08/21/2003 08/18/2003 07~30~2003 07/23/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE PS- AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE PS- AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE PS- AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE PS- AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE PS- AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE MSFLT-AUTO REPAIR/SERV MSFLT-AUTO REPAIR/SERV MSFLT-AUTO REPAIR/SERV MSFLT-AUTO REPAIR/SERV MSFLT-AUTO REPAIR/SERV MSFLT-AUTO REPAIR/SERV MSFLT-AUTO REPAIR/SERV PS- AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE PS-WINDSHIELD REPAIR 424.69 398.88 274.06 263.30 227.36 175.17 88.74 56.28 39.37 29.75 29.75 29.75 27.20 16.32 32.64 08/10/2003 AG#00-155:CEL PK MTGTN M 1,065.72 10.96 320.00 476.10 117.50 07/31/2003 PS-WASTE DISPOSAL FEES 08/18/2003 SWM-WATER QUALITY TES 08/09/2003 PS-PHOTO SERVICES 08/15/2003 AGO 1-151: LAW SVCS-POLIC 08/02/2003 08/11/2003 08/18/2003 PS-K9 VETERINARY EXPENS PS-VETERINARY EXPENSES: PS-MTHLY STRGE RENTAL F 718.68 114.96 170.00 08/18/2003 SWM-PVC FLEXIBLE COUPL 139.96 08/06~003 08/10/2003 08/14~003 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 45.66 27.42 21.43 Check Total 2,080.62 32.64 1,065.72 10.96 320.00 476.10 117.50 833.64 170.00 139.96 94.51 Page: 18 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 19 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174852 174853 174854 174855 174856 174857 174858 174859 174849 08~9/2003 006255 Voucher: 174849 174850 08/29/2003 006834 Voucher: 174850 174851 08~9/2003 000581 Voucher: 174851 08/29/2003 005321 TOSCO/FLEET SERVICES 174860 174861 174862 174863 174864 Voucher: 174852 08~9/2003 004493 Voucher: 174853 08/29/2003 001715 Voucher: 174854 08D9/2003 005253 Voucher: 174855 08~9/2003 007629 Voucher: 174856 08/29/2003 002426 Voucher: 174857 08D9/2003 003837 Voucher: 174858 08/29/2003 005019 Voucher: 174859 08/29/2003 004470 Voucher: 174860 08/29/2003 003563 Voucher: 174861 08/29/2003 005599 Voucher: 174862 08/29/2003 001124 Voucher: 174863 08/29/2003 005704 Voucher: 174864 TEKS SERVICES, INC TIWANA, KHUSHDER S TOOL TOWN INC 2546 8/21/03 37006 3150410 MILE REIMB 339336 JULY/03 133405 TOUART, A PANDORA TRUGREEN-CHEMLAWN U S BANCORP ULLIAN, GABRIELE UNITED GROCERS CASH & C 40423 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 000F80F48313 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE 34922600-001 35115512-001 35148634-001 35279157-001 US HEALTHWORKS MED GRC0021786-WA VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS C0001403 0001404 VAUSE, GREG EMPL REIMB VERIZON WIRELESS 1794763669 VERTICAL TRANSPORTATIO DVT0564X803 DVT05642X803 Inv Date 08/07/2003 08/21/2003 07/23/2003 08/06/2003 08/19/2003 07/31/2003 08/29/2003 08/19/2003 08/05/2003 08/02/2003 08/06/2003 08/18/2003 08/14/2003 08/19/2003 08/0t/2003 07/21/2003 07/21/2003 08/11/2003 08/06/2003 07/21/2003 07/21/2003 Description Amount Paid SWR-POSTAGE & MAILING O MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE PKM-REPLACEMENT TOOLS PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES PWSWR-CITY BUSINESS RE PKDBC-LAWN TREATMENT CITY VISA CHARGES FOR (J PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE PRCS-DOCUMENT DELIVER PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL SWM-EQUIPMENT RENTAL SWM-EQUIPMENT RENTAL SWM-REPAIPJMAINT SUPPL SWM-CDL PHISICAL-FOX PS-EMER DISPATCH SVCS J PS-EMER DISPATCH SVCS J PS-REIMB:POSTAGE:GREG ~ MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME AG01-61:CITY HALL ELE SVC AG00-171 :KLCC ELEV MAI NT 2,775.62 40.00 278.78 132.95 55.62 244.8O 73.78 50.00 38.88 9.52 458.83 366.33 43.72 8.16 50.00 765.00 105.00 24.47 548.71 156.47 145.68 Check Total 2,775.62 40.00 278.78 132.95 55.62 244.80 73.78 50.00 38.88 9.52 877.04 50.00 870.00 24.47 548.71 302.15 Page: 19 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 20 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174865 08/29/2003 000294 Voucher: 174865 174866 08/29/2003 000094 Voucher: 174866 174867 08/29/2003 006638 Voucher: 174867 174868 08/29/2003 001866 Voucher: 174868 174869 08/29/2003 000340 Voucher: 174869 174870 08/29/2003 001379 Voucher: 174870  '~ 174871 08/29/2003 000253 Voucher: 174871 :1 08/29/2003 006007 74872 Voucher: 174872 174873 08/29/2003 007630 Voucher: 174873 174874 08/29/2003 007271 Voucher: 174874 174875 08/29/2003 000783 Voucher: 174875 174876 08/29/2003 007620 Voucher: 174876 174877 08/29/2003 005565 Voucher: 174877 174878 08/29/2003 003500 Voucher: 174878 174879 08~9~003 001241 Voucher: 174879 174880 08D9~003 000173 Voucher: 174880 VILMA SIGNS 274 WA STATE AUDITOR'S OFFI L46080 WA STATE DEPT OF LICENS JULY 2003 WA STATE ECOLOGY DEPAR WC03054001 WA STATE INFORMATION S WA STATE L&I ELEVATOR S 2OO307O236 2003070234 0056525 WA STATE TRANSPORTATIO WALKER ACE HARDWARE WALKER, RON ATB30812168 ATB30812132 00119971 16 00119790 17 00121430 16 133403 WASHINGTON APPRAISAL S 6031 WASTE MANAGEMENT 003067310551 WEASO C2512R4846 WELCOME COMMUNICATIO 3010 WESCOM COMMUNICATIO WEST COAST AWARDS 13438 13710 13711 13439 40007 WEST PUBLISHING CORPOR/804761700 Inv Date 07~3/2003 08/13/2003 07/31/2003 08/08~003 08/04/2003 08/04/2003 08/27/2003 08/12/2003 08/12/2003 08/07/2003 08/06/2003 08/15/2003 08/19/2003 08/13/2003 08/01/2003 08/19~003 08/06/2003 05/12~003 08/13~003 08/13/2003 05/12D003 07/31/2003 07/25/2003 Description Amount Paid PRCS-K-9 CARNIVAL BANNE 233.92 MSF-AUDIT SVCS: JULY 200 1,065.30 8.84 11,046.29 CDB - LICENSE REPORTING AG03-127:EXOTIC PLANT CT MSDP/RR-SERVER- SQL SE MSTEL-SCAN SERVICE RNWL ELEVATOR OPERATI 5,992.65 1,056.87 100.00 PWSCIP-GENERAL INSP-PA PWSCIP-GENERAL INSP-PA PKM-GRD:CNSTRCTN TOOL PKM-GRD:CNSTRCTN TOOL PKM-GRD:CNSTRCTN TOOL PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D 282.09 70.11 12.15 9.14 7.26 500.00 MS-APPRAISAL FEE JOB~03 6,000.00 336.13 220.00 148.67 PWSWR-LITTER DISPOSAL PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE MSDP - NEXTEL CELLPHON PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST CDB - SAMPLE SHIRTS TO T 141.44 87.04 87.04 87.04 69.08 LAW-RCWA CHAP 9 - THREE 228.03 Check Total 233.92 1,065.30 8.84 11,046.29 7,O49.52 100.00 352.20 28.55 500.00 6,000.00 336.13 220.00 148.67 402.56 69.08 228.03 Page: 20 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 21 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174881 08/29/2003 001427 Voucher: 174881 174882 08/29/2003 007631 Voucher: 174882 174883 08/29~003 002204 Voucher: 174883 174884 08/29~003 005680 Voucher: 174884 174885 08~9/2003 007239 Voucher: 174885 174886 08~9~003 000660 Voucher: 174886 174887 08/29/2003 005722 Voucher: 174887 174888 08/29/2003 000947 : Voucher: 174888 474889 08/29/2003 005545 Voucher: 174889 174890 08/29/2003 000694 Voucher: 174890 WESTERN POWER & EQUIP WHAM, GAll J57741 343804 J57706 133412 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY 24-123961 WILD WEST INTERNATIONAL 2525 WINDMILL GARDENS 203-66478 WOODWORTH & COMPANY I 158387 157901 YAKIMA COUNTY DEPARTMEIJUNE 2003 YOUR INC 2974 2976 YSI INCORPORATED 460745 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE COMF68766521 Inv Date Description Amount Paid 08/04/2003 08/08/2003 08/04/2003 08/19/2003 07/28~003 07/30~003 06/30~003 08/13/2003 07/31/2003 07/02/2003 08/20~003 08/20~003 07/31~003 08/14~003 MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D SWM-GRASS SEED AND ER PS-FIRING RANGE FEE SVC PWS-HANGING FLOWER BA PWSWM-GENERAL CONTR PWSWM-GENERAL CONTR PS-JAIL SERVICES 6/03 AG02-48: PS/JANITORIAL SV AG00-15C:MC JANITORIAL S SWM-WATER QUALITY SUP PKDBC-FIRST AID SUPPLIES 115.00 55.88 16.70 50.00 54.94 54.91 4,856.29 979.73 76.18 29,576.40 1,629.40 699.00 326.80 65.39 Sub total for us bank: Check Total 187.58 50.00 54.94 54.91 4,856.29 1,055.91 29,576.40 2,328.40 326.80 65.39 1,294,521.43 Page:21 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 22 245 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 1,294,521.43 Page: 22 apChkLst 08~29~2003 10:22:05AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 23 Bank code: key Check # Date 174677 08/29/2003 Page:23 apChkLst 09115/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: I Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor 174891 09/03/2003 007377 Voucher: 174891 174892 09/05/2003 001287 Voucher: 174892 174893 09/05/2003 001898 Voucher: 174893 174894 09/10/2003 001004 Voucher: 174894 174895 09/15/2003 000332 Voucher: 174895 174896 09/15/2003 001856 Voucher: 174896 174897 09/15/2003 000109 Voucher: 174897 174898 09/15/2003 007637 Voucher: 174898 174899 09/15/2003 000475 Voucher: 174899 174900 09/15/2003 005901 Voucher: 174900 174901 09/15/2003 001110 Voucher: 174901 174902 09/15/2003 005287 Voucher: 174902 174903 09/15/2003 003645 Voucher: 174903 174904 09/15~003 003129 Voucher: 174904 Invoice AIR-FX 71403 CITY OF TACOMA K KRUSEY KING COUNTY FINANCE OFF L02P0001 MAILMEDIA INC 40994 ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS I 0067181-1 0896795-1N ACTION SERVICES CORPORa46164 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL 13334 AKELA SECURITY SERVICE I 3097 ALARM CENTERS/CUSTOM S 295213 ALL SPORTS CLOTHING SUPIFW-080403 AMAYA ELECTRIC AMERICALL COMMUNICATIO AMERICAN JANITORIAL SVC AMS LASER SUPPLY 6879-10 D6416 3004 3005 3006 344813 344811 344812 344065 261006CR Inv Date Description 07/14/2003 09/04/2003 08/15/2003 08/27/2003 08/30/2003 08/21/2003 08/29/2003 08/18/2003 08/26/2003 08/20/2003 08/04/2003 08/25/2003 09/01/2003 09~04~2003 09/04/2003 09/04/2003 08/29/2003 08/29/2003 08/29/2003 08/12~2003 08/11/2003 PS-PAINTING OF HELMET- PS-TUITION FEE:CYCLIST C CDPL-NORTHLAKE ESTATE PRCS-POSTAGE FOR ARTS LAW-MONTHLY SRV CHRG S LAW-MONTHLY SRV CHRG S AG00,6C:(AUG/03)STRT SWE PKM-FAClLITY LOCKSMITH S MC-7/03 UNARMED SCRT G PKRCS-9/03 ALRM MNTR SV PRCS-DAY CAMP T-SHIRTS AG02-138:(JULY/03)CHB ELE SWM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT AG00-50A:(AUG/03) DBC JNT AG00-50A:(AUG/03) KFT JNT AG00-50A:(AUG/03)PKM JNT MS/PS-PRINTER TONER~ MS/PS-PRINTER TONER~ MS/PS-PRINTER TONER- MSDP-PRINTER TONER- MSDP-PRINTER TONER- Amount Paid 254.12 250.00 250.00 712.50 96.00 5.00 2,961.20 143.62 2,833.25 59.74 230.59 3,778.23 139.40 4,955.63 613.20 547.50 430.79 368.67 54.40 46.78 -130.51 Check Total 254.12 250.00 250.00 712.50 101.00 2,961.20 143.62 2,833.25 59.74 230.59 3,778.23 139.40 6,116.33 770.13 Page: 1 apChkLst 09/15/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CiTY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 2 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid Check Total 174905 09/15/2003 005501 Voucher: 174905 174906 09/15/2003 005715 Voucher: 174906 174907 09/15/2003 001233 Voucher: 174907 174908 09/15/2003 000075 Voucher: 174908 174909 09/15/2003 000004 Voucher: 174909 174910 09/15/2003 007647 Voucher: 174910 174911~ 09/15/2003 004128 . Voucher: 174911 ~.~ 174912' 09/15/2003 001604 'Voucher: 174912 174913 09/15/2003 002386 Voucher: 174913 174914 09/15/2003 005421 Voucher: 174914 174915 09/15/2003 703199 Voucher: 174915 174916 09/15/2003 007479 Voucher: 174916 174917 09/15/2003 004158 Voucher: 174917 174918 09/15/2003 007642 Voucher: 174918 ANDREWS, AMY ARCH WIRELESS HOLDINGS 8~6/03 9~/03 0~12/03 IM61638381 AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE 2536613748 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES I 20405718 AWC-ASSOC OF WASHINGT 10/22/03 BAEG, OK H 03-43485 BAGNELL INC 5889 BALL, GIGI Y 9/2/03 BANHEGYI/PAWLAK, SUSAN 9/2/03 9/4/03 9/5/03 BARGER, KENNETH 8/14/03 8/13/03 8/15/03 BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERI 02-47930 BARKER RINKER SEACAT 4859 BERNER, ILYA S 8/26/03 BLACKSTONE'S COLLISION I 2591-1 08/26/2003 09/02/2003 08/12/2003 09/02/2003 08/16/2003 09/02/2003 08/28/2003 08/25/2003 08/25/2003 09/02/2003 09/02/2003 09/04/2003 09/05/2003 08/14/2003 08/13/2003 08/15/2003 09/05/2003 08/07/2003 08/26/2003 07/21/2003 MC-INTERPRETER SVCS MC-INTERPRETER SVCS MC-INTERPRETER SVCS MSTEL-~03/03-10/02/03PAG MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV MSTEL- AUG 2003 CELL AIR '1 AWC REGISTRATION FOR D PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC PS-PRINTING SERVICES:VIC MC-MUNICIPAL COURT MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE INTERPRETER SERVICES INTERPRETER SERVICES INTERPRETER SERVICES INTERPRETER SERVICES INTERPRETER SERVICES PW-RFND EXPR FEE:00-10 AG03-73:(JULY/03)COM CTR I INTERPRETER SERVICES RISK# 03-03-091-273 LST DT ~ 150.00 80.00 70.00 735.47 68.16 967.45 30.00 75.00 711.62 43.75 35.00 35.00 35.00 67.50 45.00 45.00 450.49 22,927.47 100.00 1,872.86 300.00 735.47 68.16 967.45 30.00 75.00 711.62 43.75 105.00 157.50 450.49 22,927.47 100.00 1,872.86 Page: 2 apChkLst 09115/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAy Page: 3 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174919 09/15/2003 001630 Voucher: 174919 174920 09/15/2003 004919 Voucher: 174920 174921 09/15/2003 004315 Voucher: - 174921 174922 09/15/2003 000414 Voucher: 174922 174923 09/15/2003 000991 Voucher: 174923 174924 09/15/2003 001481 Voucher: 174924 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO I BRATVVEAR BRENT'S ALIGNMENT & REP CAFE PACIFIC CATERING IN CASCADE COFFEE INC CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC 313782 315245 320209 315538-01 318611 314593-02 127198 006230 7167 7171 7178 7176 7132 7175 7185 7180 7182 7181 7168 7179 7170 7169 7173 7177 7186 7154 7184 7174 20345563 30333760 3425044 Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid 08/27/2003 08/28/2003 08~28~2003 08/13~2003 08/27/2003 08/13/2003 0812712003 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING PS-SPECIALIZED POLICE AP 616.08 316.28 244.53 183.76 108.53 99.66 121.76 08/29/2003 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 200.51 08/29~003 09/02~003 09/02~003 09/02D003 08/25~003 09/02/2003 09/02/2003 09/02~003 09/02/2003 09/02~003 09/02~003 09/02~003 09/02~003 09/02~003 09/02/2003 09/02/2003 09/02/2003 08/27~003 09/02~003 09/02~003 09/08D003 06/09~003 08/29/2003 DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES CM- CATERING SERVICES F DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES DBC- CATERING SERVICES MSM&D-MTG COFFEE SUPP PKRLS-MTG COFFEE SUPPL AG03-67:(7/03) S288 ST/SR99 2,677.20 1,687.16 1,380.40 1,190.00 1,046.42 684.40 627.00 442.00 440.64 407.04 376.80 367.20 286.00 273.30 220.68 137.16 131.56 124.35 91.32 73.56 120.86 72.00 19,421.67 Check Total 1,568.84 121.76 200.51 12,664.19 192.86 19,421.67 Page: 3 apChkLst 09/1512003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 4 Bank: key us bank Check # Date VendOr (Continued) Invoice 174925 09/15/2003 005712 Voucher: 174925 174926 09/15/2003 007443 Voucher: 174926 174927 09/15/2003 006417 Voucher: 174927 174928 09/15/2003 000142 Voucher: 174928 174929 174930 174931 174932 09/15/2003 004412 Voucher: 174929 09/15/2003 003564 Voucher: 174930 09/15/2003 000650 Voucher: 174931 09/15/2003 003752 Voucher: 174932 174933 09/15/2003 007329 Voucher: 174933 174934 09/15/2003 007317 Voucher: 174934 CHANG, JENNY 8/30/03 CITIES INSURANCE ASSO OF 0304-022 CITY OF EVERETT 103002760 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE CK# 2057 CK#2062 CK~2063 CK#2060 CITY OF TACOMNSURPLUS ~071-03 CLARY, JOHN 07/23/03 COASTLINE TRACTOR WO14078 COASTVVlDE SUPPLY DBA COMBAT SHOOTING&TACTI T1249221 T1240883-1 T1254045 T1248057 T1251917 8/18-8~2/03 COMCAST OF WASHINGTON 849834016036 174935 174936 174937 174938 174939 09/15/2003 002935 COMMISSION ON ACCREDIT Voucher: 174935 09/15/2003 004395 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICA Voucher: 174936 09/15/2003 000721 Voucher: 174937 09/15/2003 000771 Voucher: 174938 09/15/2003 007541 Voucher: 174939 CORLISS RESOURCES INC COSTCO/HRS USA DAMARK CORPORATION 17908 0220-423636 0040422 AUG 2003 101849 Inv Date 08/30/2003 09/01/2003 O8/27/2003 08/13/2003 09/09/2003 09/09/2003 09/08/2003 08/01/2003 08/26/2003 08/22/2003 08/15/2003 08/14/2003 08/27/2003 08/13~2003 08/27/2003 07/28/2003 08/27/2003 08/21/2003 08/11/2003 08/25/2003 08/26/2003 08/28/2003 Description Amount Paid Check Total INTERPRETER SERVICES CITY INS PREM-AUTO PS-SURVIVAL SPANISH:LAW PS-TRVL EXP:EFF MD PRCT~ MSHR-TRVL EXP:WAPELRA ( MSF-TRVL EXP:WAPELRA ( CD-TRVL EXP:WA COUNTY ( PS-VEH REPAIRS (JULY/20 PS-REIMB:PURCHASE OF K9 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~ PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~ PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLI PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLI PS- SRT HOSTAGE TRAININ MSGAC- 9/6/03-10/05/03COM PS- CALEA CONFERENCE F PKMCHB-LIGHTING SUPPLI SWMClP-CONCRETE SUPPL MSF-(AUG/2003)SUPPLIES PD VIDEO SERV--320TH FIB 35.00 35.00 308,334.00 308,334.00 150.00 150.00 767.16 146.82 48.00 44.00 1,005.98 1,777.69 1,777.69 108.71 108.71 350.00 350.00 188.71 173.56 163.00 145.31 137.58 808.16 8,000.00 8,000.00 81.59 81.59 400.00 400.00 150.27 150.27 98.61 98.61 941.23 941.23 1,944.26 1,944.26 Page:4 apChkLst 09/15/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 5 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 174940 09/15/2003 000939 Voucher: 174940 174941 09/15/2003 003472 Voucher: 174941 174942 09/15/2003 000438 Voucher: 174942 174943 09/15/2003 701001 Voucher: 174943 174944 09/15/2003 005341 Voucher: 174944 174945 09/15/2003 007648 Voucher: 174945 174946 09/15/2003 005842 Voucher: 174946 174947 09/15/2003 007612 Voucher: 174947 174948 09/15/2003 000570 Voucher: 174948 174949 09/15D003 007649 Voucher: 174949 174950 09/15~003 002887 Voucher: 174950 DANONE WATERS OF NORT DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS I DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE J DIOCESE OF OLYMPIA DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA DOYLE, JESSICA E DPK INC DRAKE, WILLIAM E EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE EAGLESON, HEATHER M EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 5276423-15 5445172-15 5276319-15 5277086-15 123555 3763 3759 C2206R4864 8/26/03 9/2/03 8/27/03 03-43383 7/29/03 (1028873 1028639 1028670 1028883 1028638 1028543 1029027 1028853 1028635 1028653 1028709 03-43594 90609318 07/31/2003 08/12/2003 07/31/2003 07/31/2003 08/28/2003 09/02/2003 08/28/2003 09/03/2003 08/26~003 09/02~003 08/27~003 08/18/2003 08D9/2003 07D9/2003 08~23~2003 08/14/2003 08/15/2003 08/25/2003 08/14/2003 08/11/2003 08/30/2003 08/23/2003 08/14/2003 08/15/2003 08/18/2003 09/05/2003 08/15~2003 PKRLS-WTR/CLR RNTL ACC PRLSKJP - WATER SERVICE PKKFT-WTR/CL RNTL ACCT# PKRCS-WTR/CL RNTL ACCT PS-RADIO REPAIR #814 LUNCH MTG WITH STAFF O MC-CLERK INTERVIEW PAN PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE INTERPRETER SERVICES INTERPRETER SERVICES INTERPRETER SERVICES PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO( AG03-101:(8/03) PAC HWY H PS-REIMB:UNIFORM BOOT A MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/SER PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SERVIC PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SERVIC MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/SER PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SERVIC PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SERVIC MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/SER MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/SER PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SERVIC PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SERVIC PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SERVIC PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO( MSDP-VIRUSSCAN V7.0 SOF 65.93 31.70 31.33 24.15 49.97 32.02 18.47 75.00 180.00 100.00 80.00 75.00 94,839.96 100.00 467.76 456.65 258.53 228.50 163.80 82.79 66.37 27.19 22.84 18.49 18.49 100.00 57.44 153.11 49.97 50.49 75.00 360.00 75.00 94,839.96 100.00 1,811.41 100.00 57.44 Page: 5 apChkLst 09115/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 6 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174951 09/15/2003 000730' Voucher: 174951 174952 09/15/2003 001046 Voucher: 174952 174953 09/15/2003 000328 Voucher: 174953 174954 09/15/2003 001297 Voucher: 174954 174955 09/15/2003 004704 Voucher: 174955 174956 09/15/2003 000217 Voucher: 174956 174957 09/15/2003 002644 Voucher: 174957 174958 09/15/2003 000229 Voucher: 174958 174959 09/15/2003 000220 Voucher: 174959 174960 09/15/2003 000285 Voucher: 174960 174961 09/15/2003 004270 Voucher: 174961 174962 09/15/2003 001893 Voucher: 174962 174963 09/15/2003 004910 Voucher: 174963 174964 09/15/2003 003802 Voucher: 174964 174965 09/15/2003 001686 Voucher: 174965 ENTRANCO INC 42499 EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMAT17117628 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) FACILITY MAINTENANCE CO 0140214 0140213 138-005 FARR, CHERYL J GRAUE MU FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPOR4-799-80493 4-846-61719 FEDERAL WAY BOYS & GIRL 2QTR/2003 FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER CO2417 FEDERAL WAY EXECUTEL FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPART DONGHAE DIN DONGHAE 03-0215 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DIS 004959 004951 O04926 004897 004848 004875 SIF-AUG 2003 FILETEX LLC 03-1121 03-1137 FINAL TOUCH FINISHING SC1-134 FIRST CHOICE BUSINESS MA00080605 Inv Date 01/29/2003 08/25/2003 08/31/2003 08/31/2003 08/15/2003 08/08/2003 08/19/2003 08/01D003 08/18~003 07/03/2003 08/26~003 08/20/2003 08/20/2003 08/31/2003 08/23/2003 08/21/2003 08/02/2003 07/19/2003 06/21/2003 07~05~2003 09/10/2003 08/05/2003 08/22/2003 08/18/2003 08/30/2003 Description Amount Paid AG01-48A:(12/02) 23RD S RD 2,266.66 20.17 PS-AUG 2003 CREDIT REPOF PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES (8/ MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLES AG01-52A:(AUG/03)DBC LAN 6,619.97 2,612.26 1,237.61 LAW-TRAN SC RI P-CITY/G RA LAW-TRANSCRI P-CITY/G RA LAW-DOCUMENTS EXP DEL CDB - DOCUMENTS EXPRES AG03-120:2 QTPJ2003 OPER~ 700.00 87.50 15.60 13.20 2,500.00 750.00 CM-ADVERTISEMENT IN CH/~ CM-DONGHAE DINNER VISIT CM-DONGHAE DINNER BEV PKRCS-REMIT FIRE DEPT F 850.63 164.97 80.00 CDPL-LEGALS~ CDPL-LEGALS~ CD-HS CDBG PUBLIC NOTIC MSC-ORDINANCE ADVERTIS MSC-ORDI NANCE ADVERTIS MSC-ORDINANCE ADVERTIS MSF-(AUG/03) SCHL IMPACT 130.14 102.92 70.38 59.76 43.16 36.52 36,140.00 CDA - END TAB FOLDERS A CDA - COLORCODED LASERI PKRCS-YNG LADIES&GEN T 115.00 49.55 80.00 MSHR-8/28-11/28/03 COPIER I 471.97 Check Total 2,266.66 20.17 9,232.23 1,237.61 787.50 28.80 2,500.00 75O.O0 1,015.60 80.00 442.88 36,140.00 164.55 80.00 471.97 Page: 6 apChkLst 09/15/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 7 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 174966 09/15/2003 002664 Voucher: 174966 174967 09/15/2003 007614 Voucher: 174967 174968 09/15/2003 001669 Voucher: 174968 174969 09/15/2003 007543 Voucher: 174969 174970 09/15/2003 007404 Voucher: 174970 174971 09/15/2003 004566 Voucher: 174971 174972 09/15/2003 002574 Voucher: 174972 '~174973 09/15/2003 002547 Voucher: 174973 174974 09/15/2003 003831 Voucher: 174974 174975 09/15/2003 000671 Voucher: 174975 174976 09/15/2003 003841 Voucher: 174976 174977 09/15/2003 001487 Voucher: 174977 174978 09/15/2003 005378 Voucher: 174978 174979 09/15/2003 002477 Voucher: 174979 174980 09/15/2003 000367 Voucher: 174980 174981 09/15/2003 000016 Voucher: 174981 174982 09/15/2003 001548 Voucher: 174982 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC 50193 FLORES, STACY EMPL REIMB FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELM753590 FRANK COLUCCIO CONTRUC1 FULLER, MICHELLE M 8/26/03 8/13/03 G&M HONEST PERFORMANC 55558 55824 GRAHAM & DUNN, P.C. GRAINGER INC GSR POLYGRAPH SERVICES H D FOWLER COMPANY HEAD-QUARTERS PTS HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPA HOFFMAN, GINA HOME DEPOT-DEPT 32-250 205952 205972 753-536451-2 03-018 1135O52O 7729 34414905 34476026 EMPL REIMB 9031354 IIMC-INT'L INST OF MUN CLEFS COURTNEY IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 16431246 IMAGE MASTERS INC 84679 08/26/2003 08/27/2003 08/27/2003 07/31/2003 08/26/2003 08/13/2003 08~25~2003 08~30~2003 08/1912003 08/19/2003 08/12/2003 08/31/2003 08~26~2003 09/01/2003 08/16/2003 08/28/2003 08/04/2003 08/26/2003 09/10/2003 09/02/2003 08/15~2003 MSHR-FLEX PLAN ADM SVC PS-REIMB:EMPL TRVL EXP P AG02-95A:(JULY-AUG 27) LE AG03-70:(7/03)S 288~SR99 S INTERPRETER SERVICES INTERPRETER SERVICES MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES AG99-143:(AUG/03)LGL SVC AG99-143:(7/03)LGL SVCS ( PRCS-MOTOR, I/3HP, GENEF PS-POLYGRAPH EXAMS PKM-GD REPAIR/MAINT SUP AG01-109A:PKM SANITATIO MSDP/RR HP COMPAQ D530 MSDP/PW-RR HP COMPAQ N MC-AIRFARE WA DC CONFEf SWM-REPAI R/MAINTENANC MSC-APPL FEE CERT MUNI C MSMD-COPIES MAINT (7/5 CM-PLAQUE TO COMMEMOR 292.10 98.52 1,278.00 140,041.29 100.00 60.00 48.35 23.98 598.86 24.25 158.30 375.00 48.78 386.50 19,377.28 1,200.06 470.00 22.75 135.00 1,756.06 62.56 292.1-0 98.52 1,278.00 140,041.29 160.00 72.33 623.11 158.30 375.00 48.78 386.50 20,577.34 470.00 22.75 135.00 1,756.06 62.56 Page: 7 apChkLst 09/15/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 8 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued} Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 174983 09/15/2003 002137 Voucher: 174983 174984 09/15/2003 005691 Voucher: 174984 174985 09/15/2003 001240 Voucher: 174985 174986 09/15/2003 005231 Voucher: 174986 174987 09/15/2003 005025 Voucher: 174987 174988 09/15/2003 005934 Voucher: 174988 174989 09/15/2003 004639 Voucher: 174989 174990 09/15/2003 001259 Voucher: 174990 174991 09/15/2003 000564 Voucher: 174991 174992 09/15/2003 003898 Voucher: 174992 174993 09/15/2003 000201 Voucher: 174993 INLAND FOUNDRY SALES, IN 0755 INLAND PACIFIC STAMPS & 0472472 INRO CONSULTANTS INC 16286 lOS CAPITAL INC 5972363 J&R COMMERCIAL JNTR SVC K P TRANSLATION SERVICE KING 5 TELEVISION 1044 1045 1047 1046 8/19/03 8/26/03 KENT PRESSE KING COUNTY CRIME VICTIM AUG 2003 KING COUNTY PET LICENSE AUG 2003 KING COUNTY RADIO KINKO'S INC, ACCOUNT #020 302723 38704 40073 40082 40154 40134 4O088 515100069479 515100069387 515100069516 515100069509 515100069510 515100069499 515100069382 08/06/2003 08/26/2003 09/02/2003 08/28/2003 09/01/2003 09/01/2003 09/01/2003 09/01/2003 08/19/2003 08/26/2003 08/02/2003 09/08/2003 09/08/2003 08/31/2003 08/26/2003 08/26/2003 O8/26/20O3 08/26/2003 08/26/2003 O8/26/20O3 08/28/2003 08/21/2003 09/01/2003 08/29/2003 08/29/2003 08/29/2003 08/20/2003 SWM-VANED GRATE CDB - REPLACEMENT STAM PVVTR-INRO COURSE SARA MSMD-COPIER RENTAL agoo-51c:(aug/03) CHB JAN AG00-14C:(AUG/03) KLCC JN AG03-22:(AUG/03)MAINT OF AG03-22:(AUG/03)STEEL LK , TRANSLATION SERVICES TRANSLATION SERVICES PS-KENT PRESSER NEWS V MSF- AUG 2003 REMIT CRIM MSF- AUG 03 KC PET FEES R MSDP-RADIO SERVICES MSDP-RADIO SERVICES MSDP-RADIO SERVICES MSDP-RADIO SERVICES MSDP-RADIO SERVICES MSDP-RADIO SERVICES MSDP-RADIO SERVICES PS-PRINTING SERVICES CDA-PRINTING SERVICES PS-PRINTING SERVICES PS-PRINTING SERVICES PWA-PRINTING SERVICES~ PS-PRINTING SERVICES PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS~ 948.74 101.24 435.OO 2,721.75 1,797.00 915.00 375.OO 333.33 184.50 144.52 40.00 975.88 512.00 4,485.00 176.46 44.50 44.50 44.50 39.16 2.38 544.0O 403.10 223.69 120.22 85.10 10.88 4.35 948.74 101.24 435.00 2,7~1.75 3,420.33 329~02 40.00 975.88 512.00 4,836.50 1,391.34 Page: 8 apChkLst 0911512003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 9 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid Check Total 174994 09/15/2003 000201 Voucher: 174994 174995 09/15/2003 007643 Voucher: 174995 174996 09/15/2003 007636 Voucher: 174996 174997 09/15/2003 001456 Voucher: 174997 174998 09/15/2003 003399 Voucher: 174998 174999 09/15/2003 005322 Voucher: 174999 175000 09/15/2003 000096 Voucher: 175000 175001 09/15/2003 007557 Voucher: 175001 175002 09/15/2003 007545 Voucher: 175002 175003 09/15/2003 004052 Voucher: 175003 175004 09/15/2003 005668 Voucher: 175004 KINKO'S INC, ACCOUNT #020 KIT CESSNA KRUSEY, TIFFANY KUSTOM SIGNALS INC KVASNYUK, NIKOLAY LA QUINTA INN & SUITES LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRI LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIA LANE POWELL SPEARS LUB LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIP LAW OFFICES OF DESMOND 515100069389 SRT SNIPER MILEGAGE REI 169647 8/20/03 O2820O01576 822402 899802 2814401 835902 3033601 2049903 460602 888103 824102 888002 3088801 101 896402 3278301 02..43481 3261713 09020305 08230306 08250306 AUG 2003 08/21/2003 08/22~003 09/02/2003 08/25/2003 08~0/2003 08/12~003 08/19/2003 08/19/2003 08/19~2003 08/19~2003 08/21/2003 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 08/19~2003 08/19~2003 08/19/2003 08/19~2003 08/19/2003 08/19/2003 08/14/2003 09~05~2003 08/14/2003 08~5/2003 08/15~003 08/25~003 08/29/2003 PS-MAHER MEMORIAL ALBU PS-SRT SNIPER COURSE PS-MILEAGE REIMBURSEMEI PS-TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT/SUI DISTRICT COURT INTERPRE' PS-MAHER FUR EXP:LODGI PKM-UTLITY CHARGES PKM-UTLITY CHARGES PKM-UTLITY CHARGES PRCKJP- UTLITIES PKM-UTLITY CHARGES PKM-UTLITY CHARGES PKM-UTLITY CHARGES PKM-UTLITY CHARGES PKM-UTLITY CHARGES PKM-UTLITY CHARGES PKM-UTLITY CHARGES PKM-UTLITY CHARGES PKM-UTLITY CHARGES PWS-WATER SVCS~ PW-RFD EXPR FEE:#00-10 AG03-142:(JULY/03)PSA CNT PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT AG01-62B:(8/03)PUBLIC DEF 10.18 3,000.00 110.27 162.32 40.00 5,507.16 3,417.72 2,852.78 2,708.61 884.40 556.48 473.26 357.28 163.44 149.90 140.80 45.00 32.30 17.80 14.48 1,243.10 1,815.00 881.28 204.44 134.64 1,200.00 10.18 3,000.00 110.27 162.32 4O.0O 5,507.16 11,814.25 1,243.10 1,815.00 1,220.36 1,200.00 Page: 9 apChkLst 0911512003 Bank: Check # 175005 175006 175007 175008 175O09 175O1O 175011 175012 175013 11:19:19AM key us bank Date Vendor (Continued) 09/15/2003 004934 Voucher: 175005 09/15/2003 007641 Voucher: 175006 09/15/2003 000630 Voucher: 175007 09/15/2003 007650 Voucher: 175008 09/15/2003 005339 Voucher: 175009 LAYMAN, SANDRA LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANC LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC LOCKETT, SHARON LOWE'S HIW INC 09/15/2003 000874 Voucher: 175010 09/15/2003 005043 Voucher: 175011 09/15~003 001004 Voucher: 175012 09/15D003 004094 Voucher: 175013 MACHINERY COMPONENTS I MACHINERY POWER & EQU MAILMEDIA INC MATHESON, DEREK Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid 8/28/03 001924276-02 66525 66472 O3-43368 002421193866 002421193850 002422694572 002422694575 002423194782 002423294821 002422694576 002423694976 002421093797 002422694544 002423094742 002422094240 002422594508 002423194774 002421093788 002421293896 002423194781 002421293916 113021 112748 G0255701 40547 8/22/03 8/27/03 08/28/2003 DISTRICT COURT INTERPRE' 11/07/2001 RISK:CLAIM#LA684-00192427 08/26~003 08/18D003 08/18D003 SWM-CLASS A ROCK SWM-CLASS A ROCK PS-REFUND TI:;~FFIC SCHO( 07/30/2003 JULY-AUG: 07/30/2003 JULY-AUG: 08/14/2003 J U LY-AUG: 08/14/2003 JULY-AUG: 08/19/2003 JULY-AUG: 08/20/2003 JULY-AUG: 08/14/2003 JULY-AUG: 08/24/2003 JULY-AUG: 07/29/2003 JULY-AUG: 08/14/2003 JULY-AUG: 08/18/2003 JULY-AUG: 08/08/2003 JULY-AUG: 08/13/2003 JULY-AUG: 08/19/2003 JULY-AUG: 07/29/2003 JULY-AUG: 07/31/2003 JULY-AUG: 08/19/2003 JULY-AUG: 07/31/2003 08/22/2003 08/13/2003 08/12/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIE REPAIR SUPPLIE REPAIR SUPPLIE REPAIR SUPPLIE REPAIR SUPPLIE REPAIR SUPPLIE REPAIR SUPPLIE REPAIR SUPPLIE REPAIR SUPPLIE REPAIR SUPPLIE REPAIR SUPPLIE REPAIR SUPPLIE REPAIR SUPPLIE REPAIR SUPPLIE REPAIR SUPPLIE REPAIR SUPPLIE REPAIR SUPPLIE JULY-AUG: REPAIR SUPPLIE PKM-GROOMER DRIVER PU MSFLT-RANSOME MOWER R PKM-EQUIPMENT RENTAL 08/08/2003 PRCS-RECREATION BROCH[ 08/22/2003 CM-LODGING FOR ANNUAL 08/27/2003 CM-LUNCH DEBRIEFING MEE 92.76 2,924.00 69.63 43.52 100.00 214.14 102.32 44.54 38.94 34.55 32.48 25.85 24.86 20.67 19.55 14.01 6.40 5.40 4.73 4.29 2.48 -34.69 -53.92 93.05 27.61 368.12 1,088.38 311.18 53.31 Page: 10 Check Total 92.76 2,924.00 113.15 100.00 506.60 120.66 368.12 1,088.38 364.49 Page: 10 apChkLst 0911512003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 11 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 175014 09/15/2003 000960 Voucher: 175014 175015 09/15/2003 005406 175016 175017 175018 175019 175020 -1'175o21 Voucher: 175015 09/15/2003 001234 Voucher: 175016 09/15/2003 006008 Voucher: 175017 09/15/2003 007651 Voucher: 175018 09/15/2003 000977 Voucher: 175019 09/15/2003 000286 Voucher: 175020 09/15/2003 005470 Voucher: 175021 175022 09/15/2003 003170 Voucher: 175022 175023 09/15/2003 005160 Voucher: 175023 175024 09/15/2003 005305 Voucher: 175024 175025 09/15/2003 001902 Voucher: 175025 175026 09/15/2003 001052 Voucher: 175026 175027 09/15/2003 003922 Voucher: 175027 175028 09/15/2003 004445 Voucher: 175028 175029 09/15/2003 005561 Voucher: 175029 175030 09/15/2003 007608 Voucher: 175030 MATTHEW BENDER & COMP 6810359X MAYBERRY, MITCHEL 6 ~ 8/2003 MCCARTHY CAUSSEAUX RO 9025-00M-134 MCLOUGHLIN & EARDLEY C 0010616-1N MEADOWS, AMANDA L 03-43451 MEASUREMENT RESEARCH (814003 METROCALL WIRELESS INC MIRAI ASSOCIATES 00879676 12 11 13 36856 MODERN SECURITY SYSTE MOSELEY, DAVID MT ELECTRIC INC 2 MYERS MASTER LAWN CAR 623 622 NAPA AUTOpARTS 713898 713466 NATIONAL BAG COMPANY I 5707286 NATIONAL SAFETY INC NATIONAL TACTICAL OFFIC NELSON TOOL & EQUIPMEN 2525 MILEAGE REIM 0120110-1N TACTICAL OPE Inv Date 08/19/2003 08/28/2003 08/31/2003 05/07/2003 08/25/2003 08/14/2003 09/01/2003 07/01/2003 06/03/2003 08/04/2003 08/25/2003 08/24/2003 08/25/2003 08/29/2003 08~29~2003 08/20/2003 08/18/2003 08/26/2003 08/26/2003 08~26~2003 08/20/2003 Description Amount Paid MC-LAW RESOURCE PUBLI AG03-28:(6-8/2003)MARTIAL ,~ AG96-148B:(AUG/03)HEARIN PS-EQUIPMENT/SUPPLIES:T PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO(: AG03-1:2003 MANUAL PVMN MSTEL-9/03 PAGER SVC AG01-118B:(JUN/03)TRFFC I AG01-118B:(MAY/03)TRFFC I AG01-118B:(JUL/03)TRFFC I PKM-8/03 ALARM MONITORIh MILEAGE REIMB TO DAVID M AG03-102:8TH & S 312TH ST ~ AG01-66A:(AUG/03)LNDSCP r~ AG01-66A:(AUG/03)LN DSCP I~ MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES PS- EVIDENCE SUPPLIES~ PKM-SAFETY EQUIPMENT/E PS-MEMBERSHIP/TRAINING ~ PWS-AIR HOSE (50 FEET); I 95.02 2,331.42 885.00 42.00 75.00 19,540.00 3.52 5,721.38 3,063.83 1,563.99 34.82 516.96 74,947.75 1,849.52 268.01 42.15 4.32 989.54 242.37 525.00 217.60 Check Total 95.02 2,331.42 885.00 42.00 75.00 19,540.00 3.52 10,349.20 34.82 516.96 74,947.75 2,117.53 46.47 989.54 242.37 525.00 217.60 Page: 11 apChkLst 09/15/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 12 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check Ct Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Descri;)tion Amount Paid Check Total 175031 09/15/2003 001018 NELSON TRUCK EQUIPMENT32710 Voucher: 175031 08/25/2003 MSFLT-REPAIPJMAINT SUPP 1,389.38 1,389.38 Page: 12 apChkLst 09/15/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 13 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid Check Total 175033 09/15/2003 000043 Voucher: 175033 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE 156783 158918 158453 159213 158427 158919 158529 157828 157812 158142 158701 158017 159036 158058 158369 158375 159098 158411 158367 157988 158033 158568 159395 159041 159355 158853 158181 159455 158092 158902 159385 158895 158715 158626 158897 07/01/2003 08/15~2003 08/06/2003 08/21/2003 08/05/2003 08/1512003 08/07/2003 07~24~2003 07~23~2003 07/30/2003 08/11/2003 07~28~2003 08/1912003 07/29/2003 08/04/2003 08/04/2003 08/20/2003 08~05~2003 08/04/2003 07/28/2003 07/29/2003 08~08~2003 08/25/2003 08/19~2003 08/25/2003 08/14/2003 07/31/2003 08/26/2003 07/30/2003 08/15/2003 08/25/2003 08/15/2003 08/12/2003 08/09/2003 08/15/2003 PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PWS-MAINT TOOL/SUPPLIE PWS-MAINT TOOL/SUPPLIE PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PRKJP- SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKRLS-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PWS-MAINT TOOL/SUPPLIE PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES 241.07 104.63 82.79 71.39 67.02 62.91 62.65 59.68 49.33 48.95 39.41 39.16 38.53 38.40 31.86 29.18 27.56 26.75 26.21 23.67 15.86 14.68 13.69 13.59 11.25 8.58 7.76 7.56 7.33 7.22 7.13 6.45 4.69 4.20 3.32 Page:13 apChkLst 09/15/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: t4 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued} Invoice 175034 09/15/2003 000089 Voucher: 175034 175035 175036 ~175037 ~175038 175039 09/15/2003 006001 Voucher: 175035 09/15/2003 007652 Voucher: 175036 09/15/2003 001391 Voucher: 175037 0911512003 003529 Voucher: 175038 09/15/2003 003371 Voucher: 175039 175040 175041 175042 175043 175044 09/15/2003 002623 Voucher: 175040 09/1~2003 000504 Voucher: 175041 09/15/2003 000112 Voucher: 175042 09/15/2003 004004 Voucher: 175043 09/15/2003 000315 Voucher: 175044 NEWS TRIBUNE NOBLE, LINDA NOH, DAVID Y NORTH COAST ELECTRIC C OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SE OFFICE TEAM OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER PACIFIC COAST FORD INC PACIFIC COAST FORD INC PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE 158794 158586 158160 158412 158900 S1113420900 Sl113418100 Sl113418700 Sl113420100 420708 8~5/03 0343565 087240101 85402-001 84865-001 09736114 09773717 09699273 09647642 3516J215 2487J230 024251 FOCS94614 AUG 2003 ~544411 54412 543467 544413 Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid 08/13/2003 08~08~2003 07/3112003 08/05/2003 08/15/2003 09/10~2003 07/06/2003 07/13/2003 07/27/2003 08/10/2003 08/25/2003 PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES MSHR-JOB AD (8/3)~ MSHR-JOB AD (7/6)~ MSHR-JOB AD (7/13)- MSHR-JOB AD (7/27)- PS-9/12/03-12/12/03 NEWSPA INTERPRETER SERVICES 1.61 1.56 1.52 1.07 1.03 553.40 545.40 545.40 545.40 34.50 75.55 09/03/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO( 75.00 08/12/2003 PKRLS-ELECTRICAL SU PP LI 34.25 08~9/2003 08/28/2003 08/19/2003 08~7~003 08/12/2003 08~04~2003 08/03D003 08/18/2003 07/11~003 PS- PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHY,< PS- PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHY,~ LAW-TEMP HELP K FORMS 8 LAW-TEMP HELP K FORMS 8 LAW-TEMP OFFICE HELP-L CDA - TEMPORARY CLERICA PKPL-OFFICE SUPPLIES PKMT-OFFICE SUPPLIES SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 140.00 140.00 1,062.00 1,062.00 849.60 709.92 115.33 11.12 261.08 08/25/2003 PS-VEHICLE REPAIRS/MAIN 118.48 08/01/2003 SIU-(AUG/03)POLICE VEH LE 1,017.80 08/19/2003 SWMCIP-TITLE REPORTS; P 08/13/2003 SWMCIP-TITLE REPORTS; P 08/13/2003 PK/PL: TITLE REPORT HYLEE 08/15/2003 SWMCIP-TITLE REPORTS; P 380.80 380.80 380.80 359.04 Check Total 1,311.25 2,224.10 75.55 75.00 34.25 280.00 3,683.52 126.45 261.08 118.48 1,017.80 1,501.44 Page: 14 apChkLst 09115/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 15 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 175045 09/15/2003 001814 Voucher: 175045 175046 09/15/2003 007653 Voucher: 175046 175047 09/15/2003 001189 Voucher: 175047 175048 09/15/2003 001166 Voucher: 175048 175049 09/15/2003 007470 Voucher: 175049 175050 09/15/2003 002557 Voucher: 175050 ?175051 09/15/2003 002822 Voucher: 175051 175052 09/15/2003 006241 Voucher: 175052 175053 09/15/2003 002024 Voucher: 175053 175054 09/15/2003 003537 Voucher: 175054 175055 09/15/2003 005941 Voucher: 175055 175056 09/15/2003 001411 Voucher: 175056 175057 09/15/2003 005583 Voucher: 175057 175058 09/15/2003 000049 Voucher: 175058 PARAMETRIX INC PECHENYUK, ROMAN PETTY CASH- CM OFFICE PETTY CASH - KLAHANEE PETTY CASH - MGMT. SVC. 03-43536 03-43611 CM 9/4/03 KLCC 9/4/03 017698 PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS M PKM 8/28/03 PETTY CASH-DUMAS BAY CE DBC 9/3/03 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT PS 9/2/03 PETTY CASH-WITNESS FEES 9/8/03 PIERCE COUNTY SECURITY 1085365 PIONEER MANUFACTURING (INV152256 INV151223 POSTAL EXPRESS INC BM2307003 BM2307023 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 229214 PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LL 595879 Inv Date Description Amount Paid 09/02/2003 AG02-113A:(AUG/03)I 3 AVE S 09/03/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO( 09/04/2003 RECORDING FEES ON SUE t- 09/04/2003 PRCS-FILM DEVELOPING FO 09/08/2003 MSHR-PARKING FAITH-SE 08/28/2003 PKM-PETTY CASH FUND RE 09/03/2003 PKDBC-TIDE BOOK:GUEST I 09/02/2003 PS-COAST GUARD PIPE:MA 09/08/2003 MSF-REIM WITNESS FUND P 08/05/2003 PRCS-SECURITY FOR RW&B 08/22/2003 PKM-FIELD MARKING PAINT 08/15/2003 PKM-FIELD MARKING PAINT 06/30/2003 CITY MAIL PROCESSING/COt 08/07/2003 CITY MAIL PROCESSING/COt 08/20/2003 PKM-WELDING SUPPLIES 08/20/2003 AG02-137:(JULY/03)CLS ACT 7,365.46 75.00 206.32 209.60 164.13 78.52 117.70 203.53 162.90 585.75 1,494.00 83.00 5,255.09 4,873.30 15.27 3,919.35 Check Total 7,365.46 75.00 206.32 209.60 164.13 78.52 117.70 203.53 162.90 585.75 1,577.00 10,128.39 15.27 3,919.35 Page: 15 apChkLst 09115/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY page: 16 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 175060 09/15/2003 000051 Voucher: 175060 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 131-066-1002 345-200-2003 519-842-1009 504-228-1005 439-922-1003 727-469-1000 411-836-4779 398-842-1008 980-132-1002 250-275-5917 128-255-2015 888-389-1007 004-919-1000 669-650-2001 483-657-3297 128-255-3948 536-673-1007 458-148-1001 487-650-2008 625-940-2003 141-467-1006 112-722-1008 250-275-0389 993-440-2000 330-694-9979 190-977-0008 604-130-2008 225-650-2002 895-405-1002 925-940-2007 652-017-1007 996-289-0001 373-087-1005 720-429-1004 525-940-2005 Inv Date Descri~)tion Amount Paid 07/31/2003 08/15/2003 08/18/2003 08/18/2003 08/20/2003 08/19/2O03 08/20/2003 08/18/2003 08/19/2003 08/15/2003 08/19/2003 08/18/2003 08/18/2003 08/15/2003 08/19/2003 08/18/2003 07/31/2003 08/15/2003 08/15/2003 08/20/2003 08/15~2003 08/15/2003 08/18/2003 08/19/2003 08/15/2003 08/19/2003 08/15/2003 08/18/2003 08/20/2003 08/14/2003 08/20/2003 08/20/2003 08/15/2003 08/18/2003 08/14~2003 PVVTR-UTILITY CHARGES PKM- UTILITY CHARGES PKM- UTILITY CHARGES PKM- UTILITY CHARGES PKM- UTILITY CHARGES PKDBC/KFT-7/18o8/18/03 ELE PVVTR-UTILITY CHARGES PKM- UTILITY CHARGES PKMo UTILITY CHARGES Pw'rR-UTILITY CHARGES PVVTR-UTI LITY CHARGES MC-7/17/03-8/15/03 ELECTRIC PVVTR-UTILITY CHARGES PVVTR-UTILITY PWTR-UTILITY PVVTR-UTILITY PVVTR-UTI LITY PWTR-UTILITY PWTR-UTILITY PVVTR-UTILITY PWTR-UTILITY PWTR-UTILITY PVVTR-UTILITY PVVTR-UTI LITY PVVTR-UTILITY PWTR-UTILITY PVVTR-UTILITY PVVTR-UTILITY PWTR-UTILITY PVVTR-UTILITY PVVTR-UTILITY PVVTR-UTILITY PVVTR-UTILITY PVVTR-UTILITY PVVTR-UTILITY CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES 11,913.38 3,995.39 3,337.85 1,634.82 1,632.31 1,581.21 1,135.88 775.66 691.73 413.02 373.31 343.93 311.11 307.30 269.66 247.83 246.60 222.86 214.40 203.08 193.87 173.38 171.65 169.07 163.63 152.10 151.26 148.63 140.86 124.67 124.61 123.37 122.49 118.24 117.46 Check Total Page: 16 apChkLst 09/15/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 17 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Descri~)tion Amount Paid Check Total 497-198-1008 753-129-1008 420-530-2005 100-093-8728 733-930-2007 733-829-1003 904-388-1003 638-448-1005 183-469-1006 472-400-1005 128-255-9812 738-448-1003 233-930-2008 736-169-1004 177-437-1007 062-691-1002 504-368-1005 786-203-1007 886-203-1005 252-150-2001 889-288-1007 917-259-1001 755-430-2005 156-140-4276 352-691-1007 442-691-1006 359-540-2003 250-275-4910 017-470-5400 657-289-0009 303-218-1004 954-567-1001 699-699-1003 121-220-2004 221-220-2002 08/15/2003 08/19/2003 08/15/2003 08/18/2003 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 08/15/2003 07~1/2003 08/18/2003 08~0/2003 08/19/2003 07/31/2003 08/14/2003 08/19/2003 08/18/2003 08/15/2003 08/15/2003 08~0/2003 08/14/2003 08/18/2003 08~0/2003 08/18/2003 08/14/2003 08/18/2003 07/31/2003 07/31/2003 08/15/2003 08/19/2003 08/18/2003 08/18/2003 08/18/2003 08/19/2003 08/19/2003 08~0/2003 08/20/2003 PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWT-7/15-8/13/03 ELECTRICI PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PKM- UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PKM~ UTILITY CHARGES PKM~ UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILtTY CHARGES PWTR-UTILiTY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES 103.39 103.39 99.97 98.41 96.33 90.95 86.43 83.62 75.83 74.06 69.34 62.71 58.16 56.74 50.38 49.59 44.37 44.02 40.63 38.51 36.94 36.88 36.30 30.59 27.40 27.40 24.94 22.23 11.80 6.34 5.84 5.84 5.84 5.84 5.84 Page: 17 apChkLst 09/15/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 18 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 17506109/15/2003 000990 Voucher: 175061 175062 09/15/2003 006394 Voucher: 175062 175063 09/15/2003 000202 Voucher: 175063 175064 09/15~003 005922 Voucher: 175064 175065 0~15/2003 004093 Voucher: 175065 q"~175066 09/15/2003 005302 Voucher: 175066 d~175067 09/15~003 006873 Voucher: 175067 175068 09/15/2003 005033 Voucher: 175068 175069 09/15/2003 003469 Voucher: 175069 175070 09/15/2003 005940 Voucher: 175070 175071 09/15/2003 005277 Voucher: 175071 175072 09/15/2003 004849 Voucher: 175072 175073 0~15/2003 005984 Voucher: 175073 175074 0~15/2003 000106 Voucher: 175074 PUGET SOUND REGIONAL C QUADRANT CORPORATION QWEST QWEST DEX QWEST INTERPRISE RAMSEY LANDSCAPE MAIN REGENCY CLEANERS RITTER VEGETATION SERVI ROAD WARRIORS INC RUDDELL INTERNATIONAL SAFEGUARD BUSINESS SYS SAMS SANITARY & MAINTEN SCHOOL-DAZE INC SELECT TRAVEL INC 342-691-1008 0421 02-44237 206t028674 2536619833 2539469943 2539427800 016170933000 253d08604604 3146 18432 619 08505 T1-1644 019008885 80209 205876 205875 308191052 308201010 308211010 308191050 07/31'/2003 07/31/2003 09/05/2003 08/16/2003 08/16/2003 08/16/2003 08/25/2003 08/22/2O03 08/19/2003 09/02/2003 09/01/2003 08/25/2003 08/25/2003 08/18/2003 08/20/2003 08/20/2003 08/06/2003 08/05/2003 08/19/2003 08/20/2003 08/21/2003 08/19/2003 PVVTR-UTILITY CHARGES PSRC DUES ASSESSMENT F PW-RFD EXPR FEE:#01-10 MSTEL- 8/16-9/16/03 PHONE/[ MSTEL-8/16-9/16/03 PHONE/I: MSTEL-8/16-9/16/03 PHONE/I: MSTEL-8/25/03-9/25/03 PHON PKDBC-DIRECTORY AD MSTEL-8/19-9/18)03 DATA C AG00-12C:(AUG/03)ROW LN AG02-98:(AUG/03)PS DRY C PKM-ROADSIDE SPRAYING PWST-TRAFFIC CONTROL S PS-TAZER HOLSTER~ MC-CHECKS/BUSINESS FOR PKCP-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE RCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES RCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES PS-CITY TRAVEL PS-CITY TRAVEL PS-CITY TRAVEL PS-CITY TRAVEL 1.17 23,333.00 1,125.43 541.02 61.78 59.76 30.27 155.69 521.11 12,892.41 3,033.32 489.60 3,478.00 97.87 207.94 318.87 42.29 33.40 461.50 461.50 416.00 288.00 33,764.64 23,333.00 1,125.43 692.83 155.69 521.11 12,892.41 3,033.32 489.60 3,478.00 97.87 207.94 318.87 75.69 1,627.00 Page:18 apChkLst 09115/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 19 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 175075 09/15/2003 001988 Voucher: 175075 175076 09/15/2003 002231 Voucher: 175076 175077 09/15/2003 002501 Voucher: 175077 175078 09/15/2003 003389 Voucher: 175078 175079 09/15/2003 000056 Voucher: 175079 175080 09/15/2003 007646 Voucher: 175080 175081 09/15/2003 004550 Voucher: 175081 175082 09/15/2003 003697 Voucher: 175082 175083 09/15/2003 003001 Voucher: 175083 175084 09/15/2003 001885 Voucher: 175084 175085 09/15/2003 003198 Voucher: 175085 175086 09/15/2003 002548 Voucher: 175086 175087 09/15/2003 006151 Voucher: 175087 175088 09/15/2003 000872 Voucher: 175088 SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY 814~529 828/2014 821/3358 807/5827 SHELDON & ASSOCIATES IN 97053 SHOPE CONCRETE PRODUC'120638 SHUPP, CONNIE 120863 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTI29855 SKCMSC FEDERAL WAY ASS 02-45440 01-41287 SOFTECH INC 130345 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 13039132-01 SOUTH KING COUNCIL-HUMAC2614R4865 SPARKS CAR CARE SPEEDY SIGN-A-RAMA 11708 11810 11880 11703 11803 11804 6961 SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL SPRINT SPECTRUM 155615 155546 156317 0129395367-7 STAR LAKE GREENHOUSE I 5263 Inv Date Descril3tion- Amount Paid 08/14/2003 08/28/2003 08/21/2003 08/07/2003 07/15/2003 PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES AC PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES AC PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES AC PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES AC CDPL-ENVR:ST LUKE'S (GR 20.50 19.49 18.81 18.81 760.60 08/12/2003 SWM-TYPE 16 RISER; SWM (: 205.63 08/06/2003 PS-CITY BUSINESS REIMBUF 87.58 08/27/2003 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES 268.81 09/05/2003 09/05/2003 08/08/2003 PW-RFD EXPR FEE:#01-10 PW-RFD EXPR FEE:#01-10 MSDP/PS-EQUIFAX SOFTVVA 2,783.32 1,657.46 60.00 08/27/2003 PWST-SAFETY EQUIPMENT 135.99 09/03/2003 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 150.00 08/14/2003 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 08/26/2003 MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/SER 09/05/2003 MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/SER 08/1 !/2003 'PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 08/22/2003 MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/SER 08/22/2003 MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/SER 09/02/2003 CDPL - SMALL PUBLIC NOTI£ 485.81 323.06 265.12 41.88 39.37 27.20 870.40 08/03/2003 08/04~003 08/04D003 08/15/2003 PKRLS-PEST CONTROL SVC PKDBC-PEST CONTROL SVC PKM-ST LK PEST CONTROL PS-7/15-8/14/03 CELLULAR A 92.48 92.48 89.22 434.24 08/28/2003 PKM-PLANTS FOR PARK GR 75.75 Check Total 77.61 760.60 205.63 87.58 268.81 4,440.78 60.00 135.99 150.00 1,182.44 870.40 274.18 434.24 75.75 Page: 19 apChkLst 09/15/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 20 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 175089 09/15/2003 004926 Voucher: 175089 175090 09/15/2003 007407 Voucher: 175090 175091 09/15/2003 004356 Voucher: 175091 175092 09/15/2003 006655 Voucher: 175092 175093 09/15/2003 000588 Voucher: 175093  175094 09/15/2003 000873 Voucher: 175094 175095 09/15~003 006033 Voucher: 175095 175096 09/15/2003 004012 Voucher: 175096 175097 09/15D003 001267 Voucher: 175097 175098 09/15~003 007520 Voucher: 175098 175099 09/15~003 001436 Voucher: 175099 STRIPE RITE INC 5843 5701 SUMMERS' WORLD LTD 52390 SUMPTER, KYLE EMPL REIMB SZPEK, JOSEPH 41410O2443 TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES 008-280-509 005-224-608 008-227-187 TARGET STORES DIVISION,~1103549994 THE FAB SHOP LLC Z-1747 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GR 5638620 TOP FOODS HAGGEN INC TRAFFIC SMITHY INC TREE RECYCLERS 347184 336343 332507 332551 332592 345948 TSS3040 LK GROVE PR Inv Date 08/27/2003 08/22/2003 07/04/2003 09/03/2003 07/01/2003 08/26/2003 08/25/2003 08/26/2003 08/23/2003 08/28/2003 05/09D003 08/14/2003 04/16/2003 08/01/2003 08/08/2003 08/22/2003 08/22/2003 08/31/2003 08/22/2003 Descri~)tion Amount Paid AG03-141:(8/24) 2003 PAVEM! AG03-141 :(8/18) 2003 PAVEMI PRCS-WATER WALKWAY W/ 25,130.00 12,322.60 2,500.00 PS-REIMB:FIREARMS TRNG ,' 98.16 CDB - REIMBURSEMENT FO 160.00 PKDBC/KFT-PUBLIC UTILIT PKDBC/KFT-PUBLIC UTILIT PKKFT-PUBLIC UTILITIES~ PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 1,870:41 444.19 49.46 3.53 MSFLT - REPAIRS SVC 234.36 LAW-LIBRARY FAIR LABOR S 329.00 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE AG03-156:CITYWIDE TRAFFI 63.98 53.45 35.97 18.43 10.03 3.69 2,856.00 PKM-TREE CLEARING SERV 489.60 Check Total 37,452.60 2,500.00 98.16 160.00 2,364.06 3.53 234.36 329.00 185.55 2,856.00 489.60 Page: 20 apChkLst 09/15/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 21 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 175100 09/15/2003 001715 Voucher: 175100 '~175101 09/15/2003 003572 Voucher: 175101 ---- 175102 09/15/2003 007654 Voucher: 175102 175103 09/15/2003 002426 Voucher: 175103 175104 09/15/2003 000618 Voucher: 175104 175105 09/15/2003 005019 Voucher: 175105 175106 09/15/2003 007357 Voucher: 175106 175107 09/15/2003 000908 Voucher: 175107 175108 09/15/2003 006974 Voucher: 175108 175109 09/15~2003 001805 Voucher: 175109 175110 09/15~2003 005704 Voucher: 175110 TRUGREEN-CHEMLAWN TUCKER, CURTIS TUCKER, LINDA M 349008 349010 352855 352853 352854 352856 349007 349009 352850 352851 352852 349006 EMPL REIMB EXPLORER EV 03-43370 UNITED GROCERS CASH & C42774 43017 39262 40740 UNITED HORTICULTURAL SU 7937894 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE35125006-001 35416788-001 UNITED REPROGRAPHICS 0051549-1N UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTOOUCW031 0CIP033 UNIVERSITY PUGET SOUND C2474R4863 VADIS NORTHWEST 00013363 VERTICAL TRANSPORTATIO DVT05642X903 08/22/2003 08/22/2003 08/30/2003 08/30/2003 08/30/2003 08/30/2003 08/22/2003 08~22~2003 08~30~2003 08/30/2003 08/30/2003 0812212003 09/02/2003 08/23/2003 08/18/2003 08/18/2003 08/19/2003 07~9/2003 08/07/2003 08/07~003 08/16/2003 08/25/2003 08/05/2003 09/30/2003 11/03/2003 09/03/2003 08/31/2003 08/20/2003 PKM-FAC:PESTICIDE SVCS F PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S PKM-FAC:PESTICIDE SVCS F PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S PKRCS-PESTICIDE SVCS KL PS-REIMB:MAHER FUNERAL PS-POLICE BUSINESS REIM PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO£ PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE PKM-CUSTOM DRY BLEND M PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL CM-PRINTING OF ARCHITEC' PWDS-COURSE REGISTR. A PWDS-COURSE REGISTR. A PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE AG00-2B:(AUG/03) LITTER C AG00-171 :(AUG/03)KLCC EL 569.02 353.60 353.60 239.36 125.12 118.59 106.62 103.36 96.83 89.22 59.84 58.75 86.28 61.20 75.00 51.72 40.20 21.49 14.41 1,040.13 509.35 114.38 112.17 310.00 270.00 150.00 4,101.42 145.68 2,273.91 147.48 75.00 127.82 1,040.13 623.73 112.17 580.00 150.00 4,101.42 145.68 Page:21 apChkLst 09/15/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 22 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 175111 09/15/2003 006278 Voucher: 175111 175112 09/15/2003 004258 Voucher: 175112 175113 09/15/2003 000340 Voucher: 175113 175114 09/15/2003 001379 Voucher: 175114 175115 09/15/2003 000851 Voucher: 175115 175116 09/15/2003 004628 Voucher: 175116 r--,, 175117 09/15/2003 000061 Voucher: 175117 'J~ 175118 09/15/2003 000514 Voucher: 175118 175119 09/15/2003 006853 Voucher: 175119 175120 09/15/2003 007271 Voucher: 175120 175121 09/15/2003 000802 Voucher: 175121 175122 09/15/2003 005565 Voucher: 175122 175123 09/15/2003 003500 Voucher: 175123 175124 09/15/2003 001241 Voucher: 175124 175125 09/15/2003 006116 Voucher: i 75125 VISUAL EFFECTS 12941 WA STATE DEPT OF LICENS WA STATE INFORMATION S WA STATE L&I ELEVATOR S WA STATE PATROL WA STATE PATROL IDENTI WA STATE REVENUE DEPAR WA STATE-STATE REVENUE WAHl, PRAN 9/2/03 WASHINGTON APPRAISAL S WCMA-WA CITY MANAGEME WELCOME COMMUNICATIO WESCOM COMMUNICATIO WEST COAST AWARDS WEST GROUP PAYMENT CE JULY 2003 1105907 0056363 10304371 103O4994 JULY 2OO3 601-223-5385 AUG 2003 6O33 6034 8/19-8/22/03 3052 3032 13828 13829 13830 13831 13832 13833 40O25 40026 40078 804823750 Inv Date Descril3tion 08/21/2003 PS- WINDOW TINTING 09/09/2003 PS-REMIT CPL FEES ('JULY 05/02/2003 COPSMORE-WINDOWS SER 08/01/2003 KLCC-ELVTR OPER PERMIT- 07/08/2003 08/05~003 09/09D003 09/12~003 MSHR-JUNE 03 BACKGROUN MSHR-JULY 2003 BACKGROI. PS-REMIT CPL (FINGERPRIN MSF-(AUG/03)SALES/USE t 09/08/2003 MSF- AUG 2003 REMIT STAT 09/02/2003 INTERPRETER SERVICES 08/19~003 08/27/2003 08/12~003 MS-APPRAISAL FEE:JOB#03 MS-APPRAISAL FEE:JOB# 0 WCMA SUMMER CONF REG I 08/26/2003 08/18/2003 08/28/2003 08/28/2003 08/28/2003 08/28/2003 08/28~2003 08/28/2003 08/12/2003 08/12/2003 08/25/2003 07/31/2003 MSDP/PS - NEXTEL REPLAC MSDP - NEXTEL CAR CHARG PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST PRCS-SPRING II 40+SOCCER PRCS-T-SHIRTS FOR ADULT CDB - FEDWAY LOGO SHIRT MSDP-7/03 DATABASE/COM Amount Paid 233.92 459.00 27.68 100.00 20.00 10.00 648.00 5,934.53 51,077.40 100.00 3,500.00 2,000.00 360.00 359.51 173.98 184.96 87.04 87.04 87.04 87.04 87.04 135.56 73.88 64.08 1,130.68 Check Total 233.92 459.00 27.68 100.00 30.00 648.00 5,934.53 51,077.40 100.00 5,500.00 360.00 533.49 620.16 273.52 1,130.68 Page: 22 apChkLst 09/15/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 23 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 175126 09/15/2003 000541 Voucher: 175126 175127 09/15/2003 001990 Voucher: 175127 175128 09/15/2003 000076 Voucher: 175128 175129 09/15/2003 002204 Voucher: 175129 175130 09/15/2003 003380 Voucher: 175130 175131 09/15/2003 003521 Voucher: 175131 175132 09/15/2003 004209 Voucher: 175132 175t33 09/15/2003 000660 Voucher: 175133 175134 09/15/2003 000520 Voucher: 175134 WESTERN EQUIPMENT DIS 334787 WESTERN LINEN/WELCOME ID19101 WFOA-WA FINANCE OFFIC WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY WILSON, BRIAN WILSON, GREG 9/16-9/19/O3 24-124603 B WILSON G WILSON WLEEA (WA LAW ENFORCEM8/13-8/18/03 WOODWORTH & COMPANY I 159071 158633 WSAMA FALL 03 KJ FALL 03 PAR Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid 06/11/2003 MSFLT-TORO MOWER REPA 08/11/2003 PKRLS- 7/28 & 8/11/03 CARPE 09~04~2003 MSA-WFOA 48TH ANNUAL C 08/19/2003 SWM-GRASS SEED, EROSI 08/18/2003 PS-MAHER FUR:DINNER-LA 08/03/2003 PS-MAHER FUR:QFC,STARB 08/11/2003 PS-2003 SUMMER EXPLORE 08/31/2003 SWMCIP-GENERAL CONTRA 08/20/2003 PWSWM-GENERAL CONTR 08/25/2003 LAW-2003 WSAMA FALL CO 08/25/2003 LAW-2003 WSAMA FALL CO 134.16 90.05 260.00 54.94 222.84 84.76 290.00 372.87 332.04 145.00 145.00 Sub total for us bank: Check Total 134.16 90.05 260.00 54.94 222.84 84.76 290.00 704.91 290.00 1,138,374.87 Page: 23 apChkLst 09/15/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 24 242 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 1,138,374.87 Page: 24 apChkLst 09/15/2003 11:19:19AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 25 Bank code: key Check # Date 175032 09/15/2003 175059 09/15/2003 Page: 25