FEDRAC PKT 09-30-2003City of Federal Way
"City coUncil .'
,200'3.
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
3. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
A. Approval of the'August 26, 2003 Minutes
B. Economic Development Report (Doherty)
C. City Code Amendment - Massage Practitioners (Richardson)
D. Update of City Council's Purchasing Policies (Richardson)
E. Early Retirement of Bonds (Wang)
F. August Monthly Financial Report (Olson)
G. Vouchers (Olson)
4. OTHER
Actio~
Informatim
Actim
Actim
Informatim
Actim
Actiot
5. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
6. NEXT MEETING: October 28, 2003 4:00 p.m.
Committee Members:
Michael Park, Chair
Eric Faison
Mary Gates
I ~CfwmainWOL I IdatalMslFINANCElFINCOMMTI2003i092310923 Agenda.doc
lwen Wang, Management Services Director
Jason Suzaka, Management Analyst
(253) 661-4061
' CitY of. Federal ....Way
'..., c':',:'," ';: ~ ~' ' · :". ' ': ·"
· CoUnCil
· .Cit:v
· ;,. . . .:' ,.;: . ..~' ~,~.~,~.~ .'-'
.. "" ~'-i': '.:' - -~ .... , . e:~., '"" ·
· . ':2.'F. in~nce/Econo'mic Development/R~gional.Affairs'.C:.,0,~fiii'ttee· ..
~" ':':' "(~" ~ '"' .';~ 'i''?'' i . : ':~"': · :"'"'":"":" ~'"~ ~''~' "~': '"': '":'""~ ?"' "':';'":':'¥" '~:"~*''': ' ' "= ' "' '
: T. ue~itay}~ ~ugust':.26, ~003
~.:Z:~.U ~p~m?~. -'..:., '.,,~., .' .... :-....,.: ..... :.~
II~II
I--
MINUTES
Committee Members in Attendance: Chaff Michael Park, Member Mary Gates, Member Eric Faison.
City Council Members in Attendance: Council Member Linda Kochmar
Staff Members in Attendance: Iwen Wang, Management Services Director; David Moseley, City Manager; Derek
Matheson, Assistant City Manager; Karen Kirkpatrick, Assistant City Attorney; Michael Olson, Deputy Director of
Management Services; Rob Van Orsow, Solid Waste/Recycling Coordinator; Jason Suzaka, Management Analyst.
Others in Attendance: None.
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Michael Park called the meeting to order at 2:02 p.m.
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
None.
3. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
a) Approval of the August 26, 2003 meeting minutes
Motion to approve the July 22, 2003 meeting minutes. Motion seconded and carried.
b)
Legislative and Regional Affairs Update
Presented by Derek Matheson
Mr. Matheson reported that the lobbyist is keeping an eye on Sen. Jim Horn and his opinion that
local governments should not be using grants from other sources to use as the local match on TIB
(Transportation Improvement Board) grants. This strategy has typically worked well for Federal
Way. The Board will discuss this issue at their September retreat. Cary Roe, Doug Levy, and Don
Wickstrom (City of Kent) are meeting with the TIB Executive Director (a Federal Way resident) to
discuss their concerns on this issue.
AWC (Association of Washington Cities) is forming a committee to discuss the next step in
transportation issues. Although the 5-cent package is funding many hrq~ortant projects, it is only
fimded through the next two years, so staff will monitor to make sure that the area's projects are
funded at the right time. Ms. Gates advised that staff should track in particular the temptation by
policymakers to try to change the timing of project funding, and even try to move Federal Way's
projects up in the funding schedule.
U.S. Congressman Adam Smith will be in Federal Way on Friday, September 26th at 3pm. Staff
will work on an agenda for the meeting. Staff is also trying to get staff from our other legislative
A-1
c)
d)
e)
representatives as well. Doug Levy is also going to meet with departmental directors and key staff
in September in order to start work on the 2004 legislative agenda, which staff hopes to bring back
to FEDRAC on October 28ta and full Council on November 18t~.
Mr. Matheson will be absent from next month's meeting, as he will be on vacation.
2004-05 Solid Waste/Recycling Division Grants
Presented by Rob Van Orsow
Mr. Van Orsow reviewed the memo with the committee. Letters of intent have been sent out to the
County for each of the three grants to reserve our funding allocations. The three grants are:
Coordinated Prevention Grant, Waste Reduction/Recycling Grant, and the Local Hazardous Waste
Management Prograrr~
After the grants are reviewed by the committee, a resolution would need to be passed by the
Council (attached). No city fund expenditures would be used, since outside grant money is being
used for the match.
Councilmember Gates complimented Mr. Van Orsow on the table he created laying out the grant
projects and funding amounts. She felt that this method of presenting information could also be
used to address Senator Horn's views on local governments using grant money.
Motion to forward the resolution to full Council for approval with a "do-pass"
recommendation. Motion seconded and carried.
Insurance Renewal Update
Presented by Iwen Wang
No action is needed by Council if the City is planning on renewing insurance; however, notice will
need to be given by September 1, if the City is planning on terminating its coverage with CIAW
(Cities Insurance Association of Washington). So far, staffhas been very happy with the services
provided by CIAW.
Because CIAW uses a different policy year (September-September) than what the City was using
with St. Paul, there will need to be a budget adjustment made to accommodate. Premiums are
expected to increase by about 12.5%; however, no broker will be needed by using CIAW, so there
will be some savings realized to go along with the budgeted 10% increase.
July 2003 Monthly Financial Report
Presented by Michael Olson
Michael Olson reviewed the July Monthly Financial Report (MFR) with the Committee. Operating
revenues are slightly below YTD budget (0.3%), as are sales tax revenues (4.4%). Utility tax
revenues continue to be below budget (11.6%); however, real estate excise taxes continue to be
strong (61.9% above YTD budget).
Correction: The office building on 8tn Ave. S. should read "USAA, "not "USSA "as stated.
Staffwill look into why manufacturing seems to be so far below 2002 levels. The committee also
asked staff to produce a month-to-month showing of sales tax revenues from the SeaTac Mall.
Right of Way Permits/fees are not considered stable.
The police department's overtime expenditures continue to decline; at this rate, 2003 overtime
expenditures will be approximately 40% below 2002 levels. A main contributor to this decline is
H:'~INAlqCE'O:INCOMMTX2003\082oq0826 Minutes.doc A-2
o
the fact that the police department is nearly fully staffed, which has cut down on patrol call-backs.
Termination pay consists of vacation pay and other "buyouts" when an employee is terminated.
There was a question regarding the utility tax subsidy given for Celebration Park, and whether or
not too much of a subsidy was being given. Staffreplied that the expenditure figures do not
include the costs of program coordination. In addition, the utility tax subsidy covers the full year;
whereas the expenditure figures account for only the first six months of the year.
YTD Gambling tax revenues are down compared to 2002, mainly because of increased
competition in the area, and some of the new casinos are not doing as well as hoped.
Motion to accept the monthly financial report and forward to full Council for approval. Motion
seconded and carried.
f) Vouchers
Presented by Michael Olson
Mr. Olson presented the vouchers for approval.
Motion to accept the vouchers and forward to full Council for approval Motion seconded and
carried.
OTHER
None.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
a) City Center Redevelopment
b) Business License Amendment - Massage Practitioners
There was some discussion on whether or not a second FEDRAC meeting should take place to discuss
economic development issues, specifically in the downtown area. One option was to add a line item in the
agenda for next month's scheduled meeting to discuss this particular topic. The committee could then see
how it works and if a second meeting is needed.
The committee decided that for next month's meeting they would create in the agenda a line item labeled
"economic development report." They directed Patrick Doherty (Deputy Director of Community
Development - Economic Development) to create an agenda for that line item to discuss the topic. This
line item is for next month's agenda only - the committee will decide where to go fi.om there.
NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING
September 23, 2003 at 4:00 pm. in the Mt. Baker Conference Room. (Please note time change)
ADJOURN
Chair Michael Park adjourned the meeting at 2:50pm.
Recorded by Jason Suzaka
H:WINANCEWINCOMMT~2003\0826~0826 Minutes.doc A-3
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
Via:
From:
Subject:
September 24, 2003
Finance, Economic ~._ev,.,el,,ol;~aent and Regional Affairs Committee
David H. Mos~'~m~er
Patrick Dohe~e t~/y Director, Community Development Services
Economic DeVelopment Division activities - August & September
RELATED TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA
· Second EconomiC Opportunity Response Team meeting set up for October 8th, 7:30
a.m. at Twin Lakes Golf& Country Club. Invitations sent.
· International Trade Workshop set up for October 1st, 9:00 to 11:30 at Twin Lakes
Golf& Country Club.
· Content for Economic Development website submitted to IT team; officespace, com
contribution for site/building locator received, work continuing on remaining web
pages and links
RELATED TO LTAC AGENDA
· Tourism Enhancement Grant 2003 Second Round in September.
· Worked with events planners on Reebok Women's Triathlon Series, including LTAC
special meeting of 9/5/03 to consider the proposal. Reebok chose Federal Way
9/9/03 !
· Worked with events planners on Korean sports/culturalfestivalplanning
· Coordinatedproduction of second draft version of tourism rack card for approval at
9/5/03 LTAC mtg and final version for approval at 10/10/03 LTAC mtg.
RELATED TO PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WORK
PROGRAM
· Staffmeetings/work on potential redevelopment incentives in City Center related to
possible subsidy of grid street improvements and/or parking garage. To be raised for
discussion again at 9/30/03 FEDRAC mtg.
· SEPA Planned Action EIS initiated. Public scoping meeting held 9/17/03. Work on
Draft EIS has begun, with pubIication first part of 04.
· City Center multifamily code amendments - research completed, work has resumed in
tandem with City Center SEPA Planned Action EIS/Ordinance
· Participation on City website redesign staffteam
Memo to FEDRAC
Economic Development Activities
Page 2 of 3
RECENT MEETINGS/CONTACTS (August-September)
August
· Inquiry from Credit Advisors Inc re call center - letter and info packet sent
EDC referral regarding call center (R&R Partners) and expanding business from
Eastside (Sharebuilder) - letters and info packets sent
Inquiry regardingfinancingfor Metropolitan Market
· Inquiry about City Center residential tax exemption (referred by Masterbuilders) -
but property not in district
· Made contact with broker for Capital One former call center building and shared FW
info and recent inquiries (above)
· Inquiry from Opus NW about development activity in Federal Way and City Center
· Attended Kent-sponsored interagency discussion ofpotential Advanced
Manufacturing Center in South King County
· Met with Sea-King Co EDC Vice President to discuss marketing strategies for
Federal Way - marketing to top fastest-growing businesses in US.
Request for assistance from localproperty owner for economicprofile information,
etc., to potential new cinema tenant
Contact with Maura 0 'Neill, President of Explore Life, and discussion ofpotential
role for Federal Way
· Attended SeaTac Mall renaming workshop
· Attended International Council of Shopping Centers "Idea Exchange" in Blaine and
set up Federal Way table with information.
· Took out ad in Business Guide for the Puget Sound
· Attended Southwest King County Economic Development Initiative mtg.
· Attended King County Economic Development Officials Forum, presented by EDC
· EDC meeting
· LTAC meeting
September
· Staffmeetings on city center redevelopmentfinancing strategies
· Meetings with eventplanners on Korean sports/culturalfestivalplanning; met with
Mike Park 9/4.
· LTAC meeting - consideration of Reebok Women's Triathlon Series in Federal Way
· Lunch meetings with Councilmembers to discuss economic development agenda
· EVC meeting
· Meetings regarding new City website redesign
· Inquiry from Chicago real estatefirm marketing the Capital One call center building
regarding Federal Way market info
Memo to FEDRAC
Economic Development Activities
Page 3 of 3
· Inquiryfrorn State Office of Tourism for fall-foliage related events in Washington
State_for Today Show writer
Inquiry from State Office of Tourism for winter/spring tourism packages~events for
British Columbia travel rnagazine
· Inquiry through Seattle-King Co EDCfrorn Kubota Corp of Japan, looking for
approx. 15, 000 SF of industria/flex space for light assembly plant
· Youth Collegiate Regional Triathlon sited at Five-Mile Lake for next year
· Chamber Business Showcase
· Telecon with Doug Levy, City lobbyist, to discuss City's economic development
agenda for Legislative session
· Press contacts about the City Center Planned Action, International Trade Workshop
and tourism promotion program.
· Presentation to Coldwell-Banker broker monthly breakfast in Fife ~acorna and
Federal Way brokers)
· EDC meeting
· FEDRAC meeting to update Crnte on economic development activities, share what
other cities are doing for city center redevelopment, and discuss redevelopment
incentives for City Center
AYPROVAL B'~," . '. '
Commit~hai~} Comm~ttee'l~mber
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
Via:
From:~
Subject:
September 24, 2003
Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee
David H. Mos,~ity Manager
Patrick Dohe(ty~ty Director, Community Development Services
City Center Rvdevelopment Strategies
BACKGROUND:
On OctOber 15, 2002 City Council directed staff to continue to study potential ways the
City could financially participate in right-of-way (ROW) improvements and/or public
parking facilities in the City Center as incentives to desired redevelopment. In addition,
City Council requested additional research into the provisions of the Community
Renewal Act that might allow the use of tax-increment financing.
At the November 20, 2002 FEDRAC meeting these issues were further discussed. Staff
research into the Community Renewal Act yielded the conclusion that the tax-increment
financing provisions available through the Act would be no more advantageous than what
the City could do on its own with its own portions of both the property tax and sales tax
within whatever redevelopment area it wished to describe.
'Regarding financial participation in either ROW improvements or public parking
facilities, FEDRAC directed staff to continue to research funding mechanisms for these
potential tools, with.the cautionary note that pending decisions about the City's
community center/pool and municipal facilities may have to be resolved before a clear
understanding of the available funding would be possible. Councilmembers additionally
· requested that staff explore prioritization of City Center grid streets as a way of helping
to decide where to concentrate the potential use of limited funds.
While not definitive, discussions with Public Works staff since that time have yielded
only one clear top priority grid street in the City Center: continuation of future 21 st Ave S
between S. 316th and 320m Streets after Soun~d Transit improves a portion of this street
adjacent to the new Transit Center. In fact, the highest-priority grid street would actually
be the "ring road" connecting 11th Ave S and Pacific Highway S; however, this road is at
the far western edge of the City Center.
Now that the decisions regarding both the community center/pool and municipal facilities
building have been made, staff has resumed study of the funding sources potentially
available for financial participation in the above-cited city center facilities as incentives
to city center redevelopment.
As a preface to some preliminary recommendations for continued work on these issues,
staff has been asked to provide a brief description of other nearby cities' redevelopment
efforts.
Memo to FEDRAC
City Center Redevelopment Strategies
Page 2 of 7
City Center Redevelopment Strategies from Other Cities
To help illustrate the possibilities with respect to City Center redevelopment strategies,
here are brief summaries of the redevelopment efforts of five local cities:
Kent
Kent Station is a $130 million, 530,000 square-foot retail, education, entertainment and
residential project, slated to create a community's focal point and identity, set for
groundbreaking in 2004, with a 2005 opening. The project is located adjacent to Sound
Transit's Sounder Commuter Rail Station and parking garage, Kent's existing downtown
and the King County Regional Justice Center. This project will be developed by Langly
Properties and Tarragon DeveloPment on 19.9 acres of property that the City purchased
in 2001.
The City has contributed financially in the following ways:
· $4 million contribution to Sound Transit's parking facility for the Sounder train
station to ensure that a parking structure - not parking lot - be built.
· $14 million to purchase the 19.9-acre site.
· Approximately $2 million in right-of-way and infrastructure improvements,
which leveraged additional State and federal grant monies.
Kent accessed up to $10 million from King County in its Section 108 revolving credit
funds to help purchase the property initially. These funds needed to be paid back within
30 months, which Was just completed this past summer.
An RFP was issued and the above-cited developers were awarded the project, based on
their experience, expertise and ability to perform. The developers will be buying back
the property in phases at current market appraised value(s). It is likely that Kent will not
recoup the entirety of its purchase price due to the slump in commercial property values
since they purchased the property, the public components of the project that will benefit
the city and residents, and the specific program tied to the site that affects the free-market
appraisal of the property.
Burien
Burien Town Square is the mixed-use redevelopment of a 10-acre site in downtown
Burien, slated for new civic facilities, retail space, housing, offices, hotel uses, parking -
all bordering a major public square/open space.
Burien already owned a 1.5-acre portion of this site where its existing City Hall is sited.
Approximately 6.5 acres adjacent to City Hall (containing an abandoned Gottschalk's
department store and other buildings) was purchased by the City for approximately $5.1
million. The City has issued a letter of intent to purchase the remaining 2-acre parcel,
Memo to FEDRAC
City Center Redevelopment Strategies
Page 3 of 7
although as the developers are soon to be selected for this project, it is likely the City will
. simply step aside and let the developers purchase this remaining piece. The City has
budgeted at total of $9 million from its CIP budget (funded largely by real estate excise
tax revenues) and $1 from its Parks budget for the property acquisitions and other
improvements/contributions, although current estimates are that the total City expenditure
will be substantially less than that total amount. The City expects to break even or make
a profit in turning over the project to the selected developers, as well as anticipates a
substantial increase in property tax and sales tax revenues over the next ten years.
Tulovila
Tukwila Village is a 12Zacre mixed-use development along the east side of International
Boulevard (Highway 99) between S. 140th and 144th Streets. The $50 to 100 million
project would contain office, retail and residential buildings in a "village square" format
with a public plaza, ground-floor storefronts, and office and residential space above. The
City had two principal objectives with this project: 1) to reinvigorate a "blighted" stretch
of International Boulevard (crime, drugs, disinvestments, etc.), and 2) to create a city
center for a city that has no "Main Street" and no community focal point. The City
employed the recently updated Community Renewal Act provisions to designate a
community renewal area and project, thus freeing itself for less constrained use of public
funds. One of the difficulties associated with this site was its multiple property
ownerships. The City created a redevelopment plan, updated its Comprehensive Plan,
created design guidelines and issued and RFP. The City bought the properties, without
using condemnation (and therefore may have paid slightly higher prices), for a total of
approximately $9 million. In addition, the City will contribute approximately $2 million
for frontage improvements along the subject portion of International Boulevard. The
City used general fund revenUes and has issued bonds against those revenues. The City
anticipates that it will sell the property at a minor discount from its total acquisition price
- again because outfight purchase of all properties (to avoid condemnations) may have.
led to somewhat inflated purchase prices.
Lynnwood
Private-sector and public-sector interests have united to create a new City Center Plan at
a cost of over $500,000, split evenly between the sectors. The plan is targeting greater
densities and heights of commercial and residential development, as well as civic uses
and open space, to try to create a "Downtown Lynnwood." Alderwood Mall, at the edge
of the "downtown," is making a $50 million, 400,000-square-foot expansion with more
retail shops, restaurants, a cinema complex and three parking structures. No City money
is involved. A $32 million, 60,000-square-foot convention center is being planned and is
due to open in 2005. It is financed by the South Snohomish County Public Facilities
District, funded with lodging tax revenues and a portion of the sales tax revenues that is
credited back by the State for such projects (not available in King County).
Memo to FEDRAC
City Center Redevelopment Strategies
Page 4 of 7
University Place
This city is pursuing redevelopment of an 8-acre parcel as a mixed use Town Center
consisting of 300-500 housing units (condos, townhouse, leased units) and 325,000
square feet of "lifestyle" type retail (i.e., U-Village with housing on top). The retail will
be located above a 1778-stall parking garage and the housing will be located above the
retail.
The City obtained a line of credit (currently 2% interest rate) with the Bank of America.
The line of credit is for 3 years with a possible extension if needed. In the Spring of
2003, the City spent $8.6 million to purchase 8 acres of land within their Town Center
· Zone. The City also entered into an agreement to purchase 4 acres owned by the library
for $4 million and to move the existing library to a smaller site within the project area.
The City has spent an additional $500k in various consulting fees, for a total expenditure
of $13.1 million.
Before purchasing the land, the City invested approximately $200k of the $500k in
research activities, such as hiring an architectural firm to establish new design guidelines,
a planning consultant to deal with zoning issues, retail and housing consultants to conduct
market studies, and an economist to work out the project finances.
The'City sent out requests for qualifications earlier this month. The RFQ's are due back
the middle of October and they City will select a preferred developer in November with a
final development agreement to be executed next spring.
The City expects that clearing of the site will begin next April and construction to be
completed in 2006.
The City views its primary contribution to be the consolidation of the land and the
removal of the tenants. The City expects full cost recovery with respect to the land
purchases (i.e., $13.1 million) and expects that the developer will pay for construction of
the garage. Remaining items, such as road and sidewalk construction, on-street parking,
and other infrastructure improvements remain subject to negotiation.
If the City fails to get a developer to do the entire project, the City's fallback plan is to
sell off the parcels for redevelopment in chunks over time -- holding and leasing out the
spaces until sales are finalized. The City views its prospects as extremely good in
significant part due to the rapid progression of the project (There has not been a lot of
time for the market to change from the time City began land purchases to time when final
development agreement is signed -- RFQ out 2 months after land purchases completed;
preferred developer selected 1 month after RFQ due; final developer agreement signed 5
months later.)
Memo to FEDRAC
City Center Redevelopment Strategies
Page 5 of 7
Potential Funding Options for City Center ROW Improvements and/or Parking Facilities
As a reminder, in previous FEDRAC discussions it was noted that two readily
identifiable barriers to more intensive redevelopment of city center property are
potentially costly grid-street ROW improvements and/or the provision of costly
structured parking necessary for denser development. For this reason City Council
directed staff to continue to research potential mechanisms for funding financial
participation in key grid-street ROW improvements and/or public parking facilities.
Key to the City's participation in such improvements has been the desire to keep such
participation associated withpublic improvements. With ROW improvements, this is
naturally easy to maintain, but with parking facilities, it will be imperative to maintain
clarity with any prospective private-sector partners that City participation must be
restricted to parking facilities (or portions thereOf) that can be accessible to the general
public, as well as serve a site's commercial or other uses, or which can be bought back by
the private interest for use as private parking facilities.
Potential Funding Options
With the City Hall and Community Center projects' financing largely funded, a couple of
funding sources could become available for economic development purposes.
The 1/2% utility tax dedicated to Public Safety facility bonds is projected to
generate $600k - $625k a year. That is $180k to $200k more than the current debt
service on'the bond, which will be fully retired in 2012. The city could use this
additional revenue.as a source to fund projects on annual basis or to back the
floating of a 30-year bond for approximately $6 million to create a pool of funds
available for city center redevelopment projects, such as those mentioned above.
¸2.
With the move of the City Hall into the Paragon Building, the current City Hall
would be available for sale or for rent. This could potentially generate lump sum
proceeds or potential net rental income of approximately $230,000 annually,
which could also potentially be used to supplement the redevelopment fund pool.
As discussed last year, the City could earmark property and sales tax revenue
increments from partner projects to replenish the redevelopment fund, if so
desired.
ROW Improvement Alternative
As an alternative to financing and building the grid streets now with the participation of
City funds, the City could also consider allowing developers to dedicate needed ROW
land to the City now and defer the actual ROW improvements until such time as the
adjacent property is redeveloped, or sooner, at the City's discretion. In this approach the
City could lower the up-front burden of up to 2/3 of adjacent ROW improvement
potentially to a time when adjacent properties are developed and owners of properties
Memo to FEDRAC
City Center Redevelopment Strategies
Page 6 of 7
along both frontages would be obligated to improve only their respective one-half of the
ROW. This option could remove one of the two redevelopment obstacles without
requiring the City to invest significant capital upfront, thus allowing the limited resources
to be used for other economic development purposes. However, this alternative may not
be feasible in every redevelopment scenario,' as some ROW improvements may be
necessary to mitigate increased traffic impacts.
Potential Use of Funds
There are many potential mechanisms available to use these funds to help spark desired
city center redevelopment, but perhaps the most equitable would be to issue an RFP
during a specified time frame, whereby the City would make known its willingness to
partner with private developers to provide associated ROW improvements or public
parking facilities. A set of criteria would be developed that could include at least the
following items:
· the City's expectations regarding desired development (mixed-use, multi-story,
efficient use of land, potential for public uses, etc.),
· track record with similar development
· financial impact analysis (estimated property and sales tax increments)
· financial "gap" analysis (to determine financially necessary level of contribution)
· buy-back provisions (for parking)
Given the nature of the response, financial need of the respondents, etc., multiple
partnerships could be possible throughout the City Center.
NEXT STEPS:
Staff recommends that the Committee indicate which of the following potential
redevelopment funding sources and mechanisms should continue to be explored and
developed by staff, with the expectation that draft ordinances, policies and/or procedures
would be developed and presented back to FEDRAC and eventually on to City Council:
1. RFP's for potential public-private partnerships to help fund ROW improvements
and/or public parking facilities.
2. Commitment of a portion of the 1/2% utility tax revenues from the Public Safety
bond (approximately $180-200,000 per year now) and potentially all these
revenues ($600 - $625k per year after 2012) to create approximately $6 million
redevelopment fund.
3. Commitment of incremental property and sales tax revenues from public-private
partnership redevelopment sites to help retire redevelopment fund bond and/or
replenish fund.
4. Commitment of proceeds from selling or renting existing City Hall to help retire
redevelopment fund bond and/or replenish fund.
5. Further exploration of the feasibility of requiring delayed ROW improvements
until adjacent properties are redeveloped, where possible.
Memo to FEDRAC
City Center Redevelopment Strategies
Page 7 of 7
Upon Committee direction, staff will proceed to develoP more fully any or all of these
ideas, including the following:
· draft RFP criteria,
· financial analysis of the City's financial participation, including analysis of how
much ROW improvement and/or participation in parking structure would be
possible,
· financial analysis of potential incremental tax revenues coming back to the City,
· feasibility analysis of alternative ROW improvement timing, as mentioned above.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
Date:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
Subject:
NOvember 20, 2002
Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee
David H. MorAlity Manager
Patrick Dot~rt~t)~irector, Community Development Services
City CenterLt~ffdetrglopment Tools
Pursuant to City Council direction at its October 15, 2002 meeting., staff have researched
the following: 1) right-of-way (ROW) improvement standards within the City Center, 2)
the feasibility of implementing a Community Renewal Plan and consequent access to tax-
increment financing provisions, pursuant to the Community Renewal Act, and 3)
potential City funding of ROW improvements and/or participation in a public parking
structure. Staff were requested to report back to FEDRAC with findings and seek
continued direction.
ROW Improvement Standards
City Staff focused on the City Center grid streets, identified in the Comprehensive Plan
as intended to break up the City Center's large superblocks, since they are the rights-of-
way with the most potential improvement remaining and the most potential to be seen as
financial obstacles to desired redevelopment of City Center properties. The intent behind
researching the grid street improvement standards was to determine whether their current
improvement standards might possibly require more than the minimum improvement
necessary and, therefore, could potentially be revised. Public Works Department staff
indicated that the improvement standards for grid streets (Roadway Cross Section Q)
were analyzed and revised downward in 1998 during the last substantive revision to the
· Transportation Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. These standards currently describe a
70-foot right-of-way, with a 12-foot sidewalk (minimum necessary in the City Center), an
8-foot curbside parking lane, and a 12-foot travel lane in each direction. Only a very
~ minimal additional reduction in these standards (e.g., a one-foot reduction in the width of
the travel lane) would be possible without compromising safety. Given that these
standards were analyzed and revised so recently, that additional reductions might impair
safety, and that minimal reductions in the improvement requirements would not
substantially reduce ROW improvement costs, staff finds that there is little to no potential
for rev'~sing the grid street ROW improvement standards and recommends that they
remain as currently detailed in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan and City Code
Memo to FEDRAC
November 20, 2002
Page 2 of 2
Community Renewal Plan and Tax-Increment Financing
Staff originally recommended that study be made of the Community Renewal Act's
provisions for funding public improvements, in particular its tax-increment financing
provisions. After careful analysis of the provisions of the Act and discussion with parties
involved in draft!ng its provisions during 2001, and in light of the City Council's stated
desire to focus only on public improvements in its City Center redevelopment incentives,
it became apparent that the tax-increment financing provisions of the Community
Renewal Act provide no additional benefit over that which the City is allowed to do
without utilizing the Act. Since the Act's provisions only allow the City portions of both
sales and property tax increments within the renewal area to be captured and used to
recoup public funding expenditures, and since the City can earmark any increase in tax
revenue for any use it may be legally put to, staff recommends focusing on internal
mechanisms for public improvement funding and not utilizing the Community Renewal
Act for now.
Two general options are available with the City's existing taxing and expenditure
authority for funding public improvements:
i)
2)
fund improvements in tandem with desired redevelopment projects,
with the anticipation that future increased property and sales tax
revenues that will accrue to the City's General Fund will eventually
reimburse the City for its expenditures, or
fund improvements in tandem with desired redevelopment projects that
demonstrate specific estimates of future sales and property tax
increments over a specified time period (say, 10 years). This option
would require detailed financial analysis of accompanying
redevelopment projects and estimates of future tax revenues. However,
this would permit the City to decide what level of funding to provide,
based on those projections, a desired time horizon, and what level of
eventual reimbursement the City desires (e.g., 50%, 100%, etc.).
This option also most readily allows for the creation of a public
improvement fund for which those tax increments could be specifically
earmarked as a means of creating a revolving fund to help finance
future improvements.
Altho~ugh no accurate predictions can be made of the amount o~' increased tax revenue
that a redevelopment project might generate, some idea can be garnered by looking at one
of the City Center's moderately successful shopping centers - SeaTac Village. This
shopping center currently yields approximately $220,000 per year in sales tax revenue
and on the order of $15-20,000 per year in property tax revenue. If one of the other,
th
under-performing City Center blocks (for example the block bounded by S. 316 and S.
320th Streets and 23ra and future 21st Avenues South) were to be redeveloped with a mix
of retail, office, lodging and/or residential uses, it is possible that somewhere on the order
Memo to FEDRAC
NOvember 20, 2002
Page 3 of 3
of $200,000 in incremental sales tax revenue and $20,000 in incremental property tax
revenue could be generated. Improvement of the adjacent 21 st Avenue S. grid street
would cost on the order of $2,000,000. City funding of, say, half of that improvement
($1,000,000) could, therefore, be recouped by incremental tax revenues within
approximately 5 years. One-quarter funding ($500,000) could be recouped in about 2-1/2
years.
Another option in creating a revolving fund could be to subtract from such future tax
increments the approximately 3% rate of inflation in sales tax revenues that the City uses
in budget projections so as to avoid any, minimal impact to general city tax revenues that
are counted on for future General Fund balances. This would impact the tax revenue
increment minimally and would not materially change the time period for recouping
ROW improvement expenditures.
City Funding of ROW Improvements
Given the conclusion above that there is little to no potential for revising the grid street
ROW improvement standards, the City Council may wish to consider the concept of
funding/partially funding grid street ROW improvements as an incentive to accompany
desired redevelopment within the City Center. Observations of local commercial
developers have indicated that extensive ROW improvements, such as those that might
be necessary in constructing a grid street might serve as financial obstacles to desired
redevelopment of key City Center sites.
Consequently, future potential developers might approach the City with inquiries as to
whether the City would be willing to help reduce these financial obstacles by
participating in the financing of such ROW improvements. Other cities have even gone
so far as to finance these improvements in advance of development, as an incentive to
attract desired redevelopment. In either case, it is preferable for the City Council to have
discussed these issues in advance of any pressing developer-driven request and have a
standing, agreed-upon policy for such potential financial participation.
As discussed above, one approach would be for the City Council to earmark a certain
amount of potential funding per biennium (e.g., $500,000) that could be called upon to
help fund ROW improvements in partnership with desired private-sector development.
Criteria could be formulated that would detail whether particular development schemes
would merit such public participation. For example, such criteria could focus on mixed-
use, m~ultistory developments that further the City Center vision of the Comprehensive
Plan. In addition, financial criteria could be included that require a demonstration, based
on reasonable rates of retum, of what level of"gap" financing, up to a certain cap, would
be necessary for a particular development project to go forward. Additional criteria could
focus on the project's projected increase in City tax revenue that would be generated as a
measure of determining how quickly and/or to what extent the City's investment could be
recouped.
Memo to FEDRAC
November 20, 2002
Page 4 of 4
As discussed above, the City could specifically earmark incremental sales and property
tax revenues coming from the redevelopment area to replenish this fund so that in the
long term there would be monies available to help finance other public improvements in
the City Center.
City Participation in a Public Parking Structure
Notwithstanding what appears to be a copious supply of parking on most of City Center
sites, major redevelopment of these sites would most likely yield the need for some
amount of structured parking to accommodate tenant requirements and/or demands.
Structured parking is expensive (on the order of $15,000 per stall) and can constitute a
real obstacle to desired redevelopment projects.
Similar to the above discussion regarding right-of-way improvements, the City could
choose to partially fund a parking structure, in exchange for unrestricted public use of a
proportionate share of its park!ng spaces, as an incentive and/or assistance to a desired
redevelopment plan/project.
Three main options would be available for financing Such an investment:
1)
2)
)
One-time and/or.General Fund capital funding, to be recouped through
increased sales and property taxes over a specified period of time;
Use of funds from the revolving fund for City Center public
improvements, suggested above, to which increased sales and tax
revenues would be specifically earmarked; or
Issuance of bonds to be retired by the increased sales and property tax
revenue. This option requires the greatest amount of financial scrutiny
of a potential redevelopment project in order to be able to "bank" on the
increased tax revenue over the specified period.
An additional mechanism that should be considered would be to allow future developers
to "buy back" the City-funded parking spaces to serve the parking requirements and/or
demand for future development on or near the site of the parking structure. A developer
could be offered two options: 1) to buy the corresponding parking stalls for their sole
use, accessory to their development, to be paid for at full market rate, based on
construction/management costs, or 2) to "buy" use rights to these spaces that would also
continue to be available for general public parking in a shared-use arrangement: This
option/would likely result in a cost to the developer of less than full market rate for these
spaces. (It should be noted that the City of Auburn has employed exactly this
mechanism, after having purchased an additional floor of parking atop the Sound Transit
parking garage. They are now "selling" those stalls to new development projects to meet
their parking requirements/needs.)
Memo to FEDRAC
November 20, 2002
Page 5 of 5
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Staff recommends that the Committee indicate which of the following potential
redevelopment tools should continue to be explored and developed by staff, with the
expectation that draft ordinances, policies and/or procedures would be developed and
presented back to FEDRAC:
1. Potential funding of public ROW improvements in conjunction with
redevelopment projects, pursuant to one or more of the following options:
a. With the expectation that future increases in City sales and property tax
revenues resulting from the projects will indirectly compensate for these
expenditures;
b. With the future increases in City sales and property tax revenues resulting
from the projects be specifically designated to replenish an ongoing,
revolving fund to finance future public ROW improvements. This fund
could be supplemented each biennium with additional funding or stand
alone and be replenished solely by these incremental sales and property
tax revenues.
2. Potential financial participation in a public parking structure, pursuant to one or
more of the following options:
a. One-time and/or General Fund capital funding, to be recouped through
increased sales and property taxes over a specified period of time;
b. Use of funds from the revolving fund for City Center public
improvements, suggested above, to which increased sales and tax revenues
would be specifically earmarked; or
c. Issuance of bonds to be retired by the increased sales and property tax
revenue.
AI'PROVAI, BY ~/ .." ' '"'""':
COIX'JMITTEE:/ '~ 'I~ J ~,.~___ '"i.::":':' i
· ' '"
~ '~ommitt~ Member Committee Member ~
' (. ;h hiSr&"Chah: ..... ·
MEETING DATE:
October 15, 2002
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
CITY CENTER REDEVELOPMENT TOOLS
CATEGORY:
X CONSENT
RESOLUTION
[] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
ORDINANCE
PUBLIC HEARING
OTHER
BUDGET IMPACT:
Amount BUdgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
ATTACHMENTS: Memo to Finance/Economic Development/Regional Affairs Committee, dated 8/22,
Memo to Finance/Economic Development/Regional Affairs Committee, dated 9/30,
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND:
Pursuant to direction from the July FEDRAC meeting, City staff have held internal working sessions, co
research, and the City-Chamber Economic Development Committee cosponsored a SeaTac Mall/City Cz
Redevelopment Brainstorming Session on 8/20/02, assisted by an urban redevelopment consultant. The
FEDRAC and these activities has been to elucidate any and all tools/ideas available to the City to help f(
desired redevelopment of City Center properties, including the SeaTac Mall.
At the August 27, 2002 FEDRAC meeting, staff presented a memo (dated 8/22/02 and attached hereto)
outlining potential redevelopment tools. Of that list of nine ideas/tools, the Committee chose five for rr
detailed study and presentation back at the 9/30/02 FEDRAC meeting. Staff's memo dated 9/30/02 (att2
hereto) provides this more detailed study.
Staff presented this memo and associated information to FEDRAC at its 9/30/02 meeting, and the Corm
made the recommendations cited below.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
On 9/30/02 the Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee approved the followi
recommendations to City Council:
1. Forward to LUTC the SEPA Planned Action for the City Center Core on the area described by South
and 324th Streets and Pacific Highway South and 23rd Avenue South, and include Ross Plaza and Hill,,
development.
2. Forward the Housing Tax Exemption proposal back to City Council for a public hearing on the "resi~
targeted area," as required by RCW, followed by action on the designation of the "residential targeted a
02
02
~ducted
,nter
goal of
,ster
~riefly
)re
ched
fittee
ag
316th
;ide
lential
rea: and
action on the corresponding code amendments.
3. Forward to LUTC the issue of further studying the potential for any modification to ROW improvement
standards within the City Center Core, or specific areas therein, that could lessen this burden to developers,
while still maintaining necessary ROW functionality.
4. After LUTC has made a determination regarding the ROW improvements outlined above, return the issue to
FEDRAC to direct City staff to identify the potential incentives to redevelopment and conduct further study of
the potential for funding/partially funding these requirements.
5. Direct City staffto study further the two approaches discussed above for potentially funding or partially
funding a public parking garage in the City Center, including potential funding plans and implementation
strategies, to be brought back to FEDRAC for discussion and potential action.
6. Direct staff to continue to study the potential for and legal ramifications of implementing a Community
Renewal Plan and, barring serious legal obstacles; proceed with such a plan in tandem with the planning efforts
associated with the SEPA Planned Action.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to adopt the recommendations of the Finance, Economic Development and
Regional Affairs Committee from September 30, 2002."
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTI~'~
[] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
[] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only.)
COUNCIL BILL #
1s~ reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
IoltsIoz-
REVISED - 05/10/2001
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
Via:
From:
Subject:
September 26, 2002
Finance, Econom~pment and Regional Affairs Committee
David H. Mose/~'K~ Mhnager ·
Patrick Dohe~ty,~ uty DireCtor, Community Development SerVices
City Center ReX-[[~v~iopment Tools
BACKGROUND:
Pursuant to direction from the August FEDRAC meeting, City staffhave more fully
explored and researched five of the City Center redevelopment tools from the nine then
presented for preliminary discussion. This memo provides more information and
background on these five potential redevelopment tools, which include: SEPA Planned
Action, Housing Tax Exemption, Modify Infrastructure Requirements/Build
Infrastructure Improvements, Participate in Public Parking Garage, and use of a
Community Renewal Plan. You will note that Some of these tools require further study or
consideration before proceeding with impiementation, although preliminary steps
forward can be made without fully committing to the use of any of these tools. A
summary of the City Center Market Study is also included, as it provides a valuable
source of contextual information in considering City Center redevelopment ideas and
toolS.
City Center Market Study
Because so much of the ensuing discussion about the various redevelopment tools the
City may be interested in centers on an understanding of the City's Comprehensive Plan
vision for the City Center and its relation to the forecasted market forces, it is appropriate
to provide a summary of the market study's general conclusionshere. The market study
offered the following general conclusions:
In general, the retail/service sector will continue to be the greatest source of new
development and redevelopment in the City Center, with 533,600 additional
square feet of space forecasted by 2020.
The likelihood that office space will be developed in the City Center is weakened
by the ample supply of land available for office development in the East and West
Campus areas and their correspondingly lower land values. For this reason, only
228,600 additional square feet of office space is forecasted by 2020.
Housing faces similar obstacles as does office development in that land values,
driven by the predominant retail/service sector, are. generally too high for stand-
Memo to FEDRAC
September 26, 2002
Page 2 of 2
alone housing developments in the City Center. Nevertheless, there will be
continued demand for housing throughout the City during the next 20 years and
some of that housing will very likely be developed within the City Center. The
consultants offered a forecast of up to 600 additional housing units (most likely in
mixed-use developments) in the City Center by 2020.
The lodging sector will continue to see an oversupply for the next several years,
with demand outstripping forecasted supply only around 2010. After that time,
Federal Way may see additional lodging development, especially given its central
and accessible location, synergy with existing lodging facilities, and amateur
sports-driven lodging demand. No specific number of hotel units was forecasted.
Additionally, it should be noted that within each of the above-cited sectors, the
market study includes a more detailed forecast break-down for 2005, 2010, 2015,
as well as 2020.
Lastly, the consultants stated in their presentation on 9/16/02 ~that the City should
not be discouraged that their market-based conclusions fall short of our
Comprehensive Plan's more aggressive vision for the City Center. In fact, it was
stated that it is appropriate for a City to have a vision that reaches farther than
what the unassisted market forces might naturally bring. The discrepancy simply
points out where the City might need to provide more incentives or regulatory
tools in order to achieve the desired level of redevelopment.
SEPA Planned Action
In 2000 the City Council approved the funding for the planning and environmental work
associated with a SEPA Planned Action for the City Center. The City Center market
study was undertaken as a means of assisting the City in determining what level of
development should be planned for in the SEPA Planned Action. Now that the market
study has been completed and presented to the Land Use and Transportation Committee,
we may begin the scoping process for the proposed SEPA Planned Action.
Several important decisions need to be made regarding the SEPA Planned Action in order
to go forward. The following is a discussion of each of three principal areas of concern:
1. What area of the City Center to cover. While the City Center is comprised of
both the Core and Frame zoning districts, a Planned Action for the entire City
Center may be too massive an undertaking. Staff agrees with a suggestion offered
by developer and consultant Darrell Vange at the 8/20/02 City Center
~ Redevelopment Brainstorming Session at the SeaTac Mall; i.e., that the City
should focus its efforts in order to optimize its limited time, money and other
resources. Consequently, staff recommends that the SEPA Planned Action be
focused on the "core" of the City Center Core zone, com.1~rised of the SeaTac
Mall site, as well as the two superblocks between 320 and 316 Streets and
between Pacific Highway and 23ra Avenue.
· How much development and of what types to cover. This will take more analysis,
but in general, staff recommends that the plan for development exceed what the
" 7.o
Memo to FEDRAC
September 26, 2002
Page 3 of 3
market might naturally bring without incentives or regulations. Depending on the
timeframe chosen (below), we can consult the individual break-downs of
forecasted development per sector in the market study, and decide how much
further we would like to plan for. Staff recommends that one or two working
sessions with area stakeholders be held to arrive at the scope of the planned
action, both in quantity of development, as well as type of development.
Regarding type of development, the planned action should include a full range of
acceptable and appropriate development types, sizes and configurations to ensure
flexibility. However, it should explicitly be crafted to apply only to planned-for
development. That is to say, if the City envisions, say, mixed-use, multi-story or
multi-use developments, then we would not offer the benefit of the planned action
process to a one-story commercial strip center, for example. These (and/or other)
uses would continue to be allowable and there would be no obstacle to them, but
they should not be offered the "incentive" contemplated by the Planned Action.
What time frame to cover. The only serious issue to consider regarding the
desired time frame relates to the EIS. The longer the time frame of the
environmental disclosure and identification mitigation measures, the more work
(and money) involved in preparing the document. In addition, the modeling and
forecasting associated with the traffic analyses and accompanying mitigation
measures become more difficult. Staff recommends a time frame on the order of
10 years, with a planned update/remodeling at year 5. This does not mean that the
EIS and Planned Action would expire after ten years, but that we would plan and
analyze the impacts of a forecasted ten years' amount of redevelopment. If less
growth occurs, the Planned Action/EIS would be valid for longer. Conversely,
adding to the EIS would not be such a large undertaking as starting anew, but
would require some new work at that time.
Staff will be discussing the SEPA Planned Action and these issues with LUTC in the next
few weeks.
Housing Tax Exemption
The limited property tax exemption for multifamily housing in the City Center is still
Under consideration by the City Council. Earlier this month, the City Manager and staff
concluded efforts conducted over the Summer to meet and discuss the proposal with the
other taxing jurisdictions included in this action: Federal Way School District, King
County Library and Federal Way Fire District.
Key among these constituents' concerns was the potential demand for service during the
period when the property would yield less tax revenue. Pursuant to staff research~ two
key discoveries were made:
Related to School District demands. Staff found that school-age children
comprise on average only five percent o~f residents in new city-center multifamily
buildings in other suburban downtowns (Renton, Bellevue), compared with much
Memo to FEDRAC
September 26, 2002
Page 4 of 4
higher percentages from older multifamily buildings in the neighborhoods. As a
result, even with a partial tax exemption during the initial 1 O-year period, city
center mixed-use/multifamily buildings would likely yield re:revenues per
student of up to 20% greater than the per-student max revenue resulting from older
multifamily buildings in the neighborhoods. This is due to the substantially lower
student-per-unit ratio in these potential city center buildings and the max revenues
coming in associated with the higher land values and value of the first-floor
commercial space in mixed-use buildings.
o
Related to Fire District demands. Staff interviewed Fire Department personnel
from Renton and Bellevue to ascertain the.level of demand for service for newer
(under 10 years old) mixed-use and multifamily buildings in urban centers. Both
empirical and anecdotal information yielded the conclusion that demand for fire
and emergency medical services was noticeably lower for market-rate multifamily
buildings in urban centers during the first ten years than for older buildings in the
neighborhoods. These observations corroborate the premise that these new
buildings, with higher rents and in more urbanized locations, draw more stable
tenants, willing to pay top-of-the-market rents, such as young
professionals/cguples or recent retirees - populations less prone to fire or medical
emergency situations otherwise more frequently seen among lower-incbme
populations or households with children, such as smoking- or space heater-related
fires or medical- or accident-related emergencies associated with children.
What's more, thes~ new buildings are of new construction with generally state-of-
of-the-art wiring, plumbing, fire detection/suppression equipment, etc.
In addition, input from area developers has been positive. Two developers remarked that
the yearly savings (on the order of $70,000/year for a $7,000,000 project) constitute
about 10% of a developer's desired yearly operating income of about $700,000 - a
substantial incentive. In light of the above-cited city center market study conclusions
that, given higher land costs, potential need for structured parking, and lower average
rents, multifamily housing will be slow to come to the city center, incentives such as this
will be needed to attract this type of development.
Not to be ignored is also the fact that many of the surrounding communities have already
enacted this provision (e.g., Tacoma, Kent, Renton, Seattle), and Federal Way should do
what it can to remain competitive in the region. Failing to enact this provision may send
a tacit message to the development community that this city is not interested in
redeyelopment - clearly not the position the City has taken.
To conclude, staff believes the benefits of the housing max exemption proposal
substantially outweigh any perceived costs. The tax exemption proposal is slated to be
brought back to the City Council for consideration this Fall, and staffwill offer further
detailed support for its approval at that time. Because the November 6, 2001 public
hearing regarding designation of the "residential targeted area," pursuant to RCW
requirements, did not include sufficient public notice, the City Council must hold another
Memo to FEDRAC
September 26, 2002
Page 5 of 5
such hearing. However, after closing this additional hearing, the "residential targeted
area" may be designated and the code provisions may be approved at that very same
Council meeting, if the Council so wishes.
Modify Infrastructure Requirements/Build Infrastructure Improvements
As evinced from developers' comments over recent years, as well as mentioned at the
8/20/02 SeaTac Mall/City Center Redevelopment Brainstorming Session, right-of-way
improvements can be a substantial burden for developers, especially in Federal Way's
City Center, where new "grid streets" are required. Two approaches to reduce this
burden were discussed:
Modify Infrastructure Requirements. Under this approach, City staff (Public
Works and Community Development) could do a more detailed study of the
relationship between the codified right-of-way (ROW) improvement standards
and every proposed grid street or other proposed ROW improvement, with the
intent of finding any potential locations where the improvement standards can be
lessened throughout the City Center for these proposed grid streets. Examples
might be narrower overall ROW width, narrower roadway width, etc. Similarly,
study could be made of the need for two-thirds ROW improvement when only
one abutting property owner is making the improvement. This requirement shifts
more burden on the one 'abutting property owner, with no certainty about late-
corner's reimbursement. Or if, the full two-thirds improvement is truly necessary
for circulation purposes, perhaps the City could fund the difference between the
abutting property owner's half-ROW obligation and the two-thirds improvement
(see below).
Staff recommends that further study be made of the potential for any modification
to ROW improvement standards that could lessen this burden to developers, while
still maintaining necessary ROW functionality.
City Build/Fund Infrastructure Improvements. Recognizing that incentives may
be necessary to attract desired redevelopment, the City may find it beneficial to
fund or contribute to the funding of selected ROW improvements. (See
comments under Community Renewal Act for related discussion and additional
funding options.) Two general approaches could be considered:
Identify a focused redevelopment area and fund/partially fund key ROW
improvements and/or missing links in that area as incentive to
redevelopment; or
Offer potential funding/Partial funding of ROW improvements associated
with preidentified, desired redevelopment (especially in conjunction with
community renewal plan, discussed below under Community Renewal
AcO.
Memo to FEDRAC
September 26, 2002
Page 6 of 6
Staff recommends further study of these options, particularly associated with any
potential work to implement a community renewal plan.
Participate in Public Parking Garage
Given that the supply of parking might become a serious obstacle to desired
redevelopment of the Mall site (or likely other sites, as well), the requirement for some
amount of structured parking will likely present itself.' Parking structures, however, are
expensive, with current cost estimates running on the order of $12-15,000 per parking
stall. Most developers in the Federal Way market would shy away fi.om redevelopment
schemes that include the cost burden of a substantial amount of structured parking.
Conversely, assisting in the financing of a parking garage has been characterized as the
single best way of capacitating desired redevelopment of key sites, such as the SeaTac
Mall.
The City's participation in such an endeavor would necessarily have to result in public
benefit and usage of at least a proportionate share of the parking spaces. But, given that
most, if not all, users of such a facility would likely be visiting the associated
redevelopment site, this should not be perceived as an obstacle by an associated
develoPer.
One interesting approach has been used in the City of Santa Monica. That City has
financed and constructed public parking garages throughout its downtown and then
exacted reimbursement on a p6r-stall basis fi.om developers according to their parking
requirements and/or demand. This is feasible because on-site parking is not allowed in
downtown Santa Monica, so the parking garages essentially becomethe off-site parking
supply for individual establishments' throughout the downtown.
A variation on this approach could be considered for Federal Way, wherein developers of
future projects could "buy" use of parking spaces from the City within any publicly
funded parking facility to capture all or part of their parking reqUirement/demand. A
developer could be offered two options: 1) to buy the corresponding parking stalls for
their sole use at full market-rate based on construction/management costs, or 2) to "buy"
use rights to these spaces that also be available for general public parking in a shared-use
arrangement for somewhat less than full market rate. Again, especially for a developer
facing the prospect of constructing a parking structure in certain development scenarios,
an alternative such as this could soften the blow of the costs of structured parking.
There are essentially two approaches related to this redevelopment tool: 1) the City could
build a parking garage to serve (a) key redevelopment site(s) with or without partial
reimbursement as redevelopment occurs, or 2) the City, after careful legal analysis, may
be able to offer financing/partial financing of a parking facility as a companion to
targeted redevelopment projects, pursuant to a community renewal plan and/or SEPA
Planned Action.
Memo to FEDRAC
September 26, 2002
Page 7 of 7
Staff recommends that both of these approaches be studied further, including potential
funding plans and implementation strategies, to be brought back to FEDRAC for
discussion and potential action.
Community Renewal Plan
Pursuant to RCW '35.81 (Community Renewal Act), a municipality may create a
community renewal plan for areas it designated as "blighted." ManY criteria are listed as
qualifying for "blighted," including "inapproPriate uses of land or buildings," "defective
or inadequate street layout," and "faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy,
accessibility or usefulness." These three criteria seem particularly pertinent.
With a Comprehensive Plan vision of a multi-use city center containing mid- and high-
rise, mixed-use buildings housing commercial, residential and public/institutional uses,
the current City Center land use pattern may somewhat easily been deemed
"inappropriate." Approximately two-thirds of the land area is consumed by parking lots,
and most of the remaining land dedicated to single-use, one-story buildings. In addition,
there are substantial vacancies within the core of the City Center. Therefore, it seems
quite feasible that the City could conclude that at least the core of the City Center Core
zone (between 316th to 324th Streets and 23ra Ave and Pacific HighWay) exhibits
"inappropriate uses of land or buildings" vis-h-vis our Comprehensive Plan vision.
Similarly, this same area exhibits a pattern of very large superblocks and correspondingly
large land parcels. While some communities may face hurdles in achieving desired
redevelopment due to multiple property ownership of many small parcels, another hurdle
can be excessively large parcels that can be difficult to sell to developers interested in
smaller projects or who cannot finance the purchase of very large sites. For this reason, it
may be possible to conclude that the City Center also exhibits "faulty lot layout in
relation to size, adequacy, accessibility or usefulness."
Lastly, as detailed in the Comprehensive Plan, the City Center lacks sufficient improved
roadways to alleviate traffic congestion, improve accessibility and visibility to abutting
property and commercial establishments, and break down the superblocks to create a
more pedestrian-friendly walking environment. It is for this reason that the
Comprehensive Plan includes a layout of the potential future "grid" streets.
Consequently, it is quite reasonable for the City to conclude that the City Center exhibits
"defective or inadequate street layout."
In short, although further study and consideration of these provisions are necessary, staff
believes that at least the above-described corCofthe City Center Core zone may meet the
definition of "blighted area," pursuant to the Community Renewal Act and should be
considered for a community renewal plan.
A community renewal plan, including public input and involvement pursuant to the
RCW, would be a natural outgrowth of our Comprehensive Plan vision and could go
Memo to FEDRAC
September 26, 2002
Page 8 of 8
hand-in-hand with the planning efforts associated with the above-mentioned SEPA
Planned Action.
Once the community renewal plan is approved, the City may consider participating
financially in improvements or projects that fulfill that plan. These projects can range
from the above-cited ROW improvements or participation in a parking structure to direct
financial participation or loans to projects to "develop, expand, or retain land uses that
contribute to the success of the...plan," and "to provide incentives to property owners
and tenants to encourage them to locate in the community reneWal .area." The Act calls
out a preference for projects that "will create or retain jobs, a substantial portion'of
which, as determined by the municipality, shall be for persons of low income." Given
that the main ecOnomic engine of Federal Way's City Center are retail and service
establishments, and future redevelopment projects will likely continue to build upon this
sector, it is probable that most new jobs associated with redevelopment projects in the
City Center may continue to be in the retail/service sector and would, therefore, meet this
criterion.
Lastly, a particularly attractive component of the community Renewal Act is that it
includes a form of tax-increment financing for the community renewal area that includes
both property and sales tax. In short, this mechanism directs any increment in tax
revenues over the baseline year to a fund to pay back the City for any expenditures made
pursuant to the plan. The inclusion of sales tax revenue is particularly helpful, given that
so much of the City Center is retail/service based and generates a great deal of sales tax.
In addition, sales tax revenues are not capped, as property tax revenues have been by
recent initiatives. It should be noted that the Act allows for only the City portion to be
captured unless other jurisdictions agree to participate with their corresponding portions,
but this is still an important potential source of funds to help offset any expenditures the
City .may make-in its endeavors to attract or accompany desired redevelopment.
It should be noted that certain provisions of the Community Renewal Act deal with issues
that previously have raised concerns over limitations imposed by our State Constitution.
Use of these provisions would require careful legal analysis. Therefore, staff
recommends that the City continue to explore the legal ramifications of using this key
redevelopment tool and, barring serious legal obstacles, proceed with a community plan
in tandem with the planning efforts associated with the SEPA Planned Action. Once the
plan is done, the City Council can then deeide whether to adopt the plan p~suant to the
Community Renewal Act.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Staff recommends that the Committee:
Memo to FEDRAC
September 26, 2002
Page 9 of 9
o
o
Forward to LUTC it support for focusing the SEPA Planned Action for the
City Center Core on the area described by South 316th and 324th Streets and
Pacific Highway South and 23rd Avenue South.
Forward the Housing Tax Exemption proposal back to City Council for a
public hearing on the "residential targeted area," as required by RCW,
followed, by action on the designation of the "residential targeted area" 'And
action on the corresponding code amendments.
DireCt City staff to conduct further of the potential for any modification to
ROW improvement standards within City Center Core, or specific areas
therein, that could lessen this burden to developers, while still maintaining
necessary ROW functionality.
Direct City staff to identify key ROW improvements and/or missing links as
potential incentives to redevelopment and conduct further study of the
potential for funding/partially funding these improvements.
Direct City staff to study further the two approaches discussed above for
potentially funding or partially funding a public parking garage in the City
Center, including potential funding plans and implementation strategies, to be
brought back to FEDRAC for discussion and potential action.
Direct staff to continue to study the potential for and legal ramifications of
implementing a Community Renewal P1an and, barring serious legal
obstacles, proceed with a such a plan in tandem with the planning efforts
associated with the SEPA Planned Action.
API'ROVAI'~ BY
COMMITTEE:
Committee Chair
Committee Member
Committee Member
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROI~I:
RE:
DATE:
FEDRAC Members
Patrick Doherty, Deputy Director, Community Development Services
CITY CENTER REDEVELOPMENT IDEAS & 8/20 WORKSHOP
August 22, 2002
Pursuant to direction from the July FEDRAC meeting, City staff have held internal
working sessions, conducted research, and the City-Chamber Economic Development
Committee cosponsored a SeaTac Mall/City Center Redevelopment Brainstorming
Session on 8/20/02, assisted by an urban redevelopment .consultant. The goal of
FEDRAC and these activities has been to elucidate any and all tools/ideas available to the
City to help foster desired redevelopment of City Center properties, including the SeaTac
Mall.
Below is a list of ideas generated by staff, together with comments and responses (in
italics) from both the urban development consultant and the attendees at the 8/20/02
Brainstorming Session. The list is complemented by an additional set of notes and
comments about other issues.
SEPA Planned Action. Under this approach the City does the ElS upfront for an
anticipated level/mix of redevelopment (including alternatives), approves a
"planned action," and thus allows applicants of anticipated development to get a
substantially expedited permit without going through environmental or other
appealable land use approvals.
A great idea that developers would really welcome, as long as it includes
flexibility, multiple 'development scenarios, and mitigation measures and costs
identified up-front
Housing tax exemption. If approved by City Council, would exempt new
residential construction from City property tax for ten years.
Could be a very attractive incentive to housing developers. Given the example of
approximately $ 70, 000 in tax relief for a $ 7, 000, 000 residential project, that
couM equal on the order of lO% of the desiredannual operating income of
Memo to FEDRAC
August 22, 2002
Page 2 of 2
approximately 10% ($700, 000) on the investment. This is a substantial figure that
developers would respond to.
o
Waive development fees. Under this approach the City could waive development
review fees for desired development types - ranging from land use to building
permit fees. Given the relatively low cost of these fees vis-h-vis the total
development costs, their benefit to the developer may not outweigh their cost to
the City in person-hours. It also may raise equal protection questions.
Although this idea has great "PR" value and could impress upon some
developers and property owners that the City is committed to its objective to
foster redevelopment of the City Center, the actual economic impact of waiving
these fees is minimal. Land use and building fees typically are less than one-half
of one percent of the overall construction budget.
Waive mitigation fees. Under this approach the City could waive fees for
mitigating certain development impacts, but this would likely only work if the
City itself were intending to pay the mitigation fee and/or perform the mitigation
of identified environmental impacts. As mentioned by the Brainstorming Session
attendees, this, too, could raise equal protection issues.
Waiving mitigation fees can have a more substantive impact on the development
budget and be seen as a real incentive to most property owners/developers. It
may, however, raise concerns within the community from other property
owners/developers. Again, the mitigation would have to occur onq way or
another, so with waiving the fees, the City may have to foot the bill.
Waive utility taxes: The only tax that the City could waive in the City Center
Core or other designated area would be the utility tax. This could serve as an
incentive that developers could use to lure tenants - be that residential or
commercial - which could, therefore, potentially affect developers' interest in
City Center redevelopment opportunities.
It was felt that this would not be a great inducement to most developers, unless
they were specifically targeting potential tenants who are big users of utilities and
might see that as an incentive to locate within a new development.
6.
Reduce infrastructure requirements/Build infrastructure improvements. Under
this approach the City could either reduce the design requirements for identified
grid streets (e,g., narrow streets, allowing private drives to qualify, etc.) OR
commit to constructing desired ROW improvements itself.
This was seen as one of the most significant incentives that the City could offer.
Developers typically respond quite enthusiastically to this kind of "partnering"
with local municipalities. Given the not-insignificant burden that constructing
Memo to FEDRAC
August 22, 2002
Page 3 of 3
portions of the City Center grid street system might have on a particular
development, this couM be a real bonus. Within the Mall property itself, the
circular, internal "ring road, "contemplated in the Comprehensive Plan might be
able to have lesser width/improvemen( requirements than normally required
elsewhere in the City as a similar incentive.
o
Build public parking garage. Given that the supply of parking might become a
serious obstacle to major redevelopment of the Mall site (or possibly other sites),
the requirement for some amount of structured parking may present itself. If the
City were to fund/contribute to such a parking facility, it would remove or lower
that potential obstacle.
Similar to the previous tool, the City's constructing or participating in the
construction of a parking garage could be seen as a serious and attraCtive
"partnering" tool by developers. Notwithstanding what appears to be a large
amount of parking at the Mall, most of that parking is allocated to one tenant or
another, and new buildings or substantial expansions would displace parking that
would have to be replaced. Replacement wouM almost invariably have to come in
the form of some structured parking. So, City participation in this endeavor
would be not only a significant contribution but also could capacitate more
ambitious redevelopment schemes. This idea was characterized as one of the best
ways to help the economics of a project. There was a note of caution, however, in
that parking garages require careful financial study in order to be successful.
Some communities have succeeded with them and others have run into troubles.
Landpurchase/assetnbly. Through direct purchase, the City could assemble,
permit and/or supply infrastructure and ROW improvements to parcels that then
could be specifically marketed to developers for desired development. This is
what the Cities of Renton and Tukwila have done to attract redevelopment.
Although other communities have done this and are doing this currently, land
purchase and assembly can be difficult, especially if there are multiple property
owners and/or existing lease obligations. Of course, that is precisely the burden
that a municipality may be attempting topee potential developers from - as an
inducement. In a focused community redevelopment effort, this can be a very
successful tool (see comments below about "focusing efforts. ')
Loans and/or other financial assistance (through community renewal plan).
Given Washington State constitutional restrictions, the City cannot simply give
public money over to a private project, unless said project area meets the criteria
for a community renewal area and a community renewal plan is implemented
(RCW 35.81). Many criteria are listed, including "inappropriate uses of land or
buildings" and "defective or inadequate street layout" that could apply to the Mall
and City Center Core properties. Down-side is that this is a new, untested
provision and we would have to work hard to create a squeaky-clean record.
Memo to FEDRAC
August 22, 2002
Page 4 of 4
Note on Community Renewalprovision: This tool also allows a type of tax-
increment financing wherein the city's increment of property tax and sales tax
within the community renewal plan area may be used to retire any bonds used to
finance infrastructure or specific redevelopment projects. Other jurisdictions may
contribute their portion, but would be unlikely to do so unless they see a benefit.
One potential way King County might see a benefit and might, therefore, attract a
portion of their sales tax increment would be to document that a new, redeveloped
mall/city center would cater to some portion of our residents who now shop in
Pierce County/Tacoma Mall, etc.
With the right public process, planning and focus, a community renewal plan can
be very successful, especially if it can access/leverage some tax increment
financing tools. This new legislation should be seriously cOnsidered, especially if
the City is interested in performing any of the right-of-way improvements or
participate in constructing a parking garage.
Other Comments/Ideas:
The consultant opined that Federal Way's demographics and location are strong
and should provide a more successful mall/retail store. The combination of the
demographics, location and size of the Mall allows for a greater potential,
especially if structured parking is included.
The consultant noted that a successful city center requires a mixture of uses, not
just retail. He indicated that housing is truly a key to an active city center because
housing places people, with wallets, on the streets during all hours. Additionally,
the added population increases safety as more "eyes on the street" are available.
The consultant also mentioned that the City should remember that it is a real
estate developer. City facilities can substantially impact the city center,
regardless of the type of structure (i.e. city hall, community center, performing
arts facility, sports facility, etc.). He shared the dilemma Port Angeles is currently
facing of having moved city facilities to a site outside'the downtown area, which
is now experiencing a reduction in business. As a result, Port Angeles is
analyzing what is necessary to emczo~ urage/help development in the downtown
area.
Because of limited public ffinds and planning/public process capacity, the City
may want to consider adjusting the initial efforts to achieve City Center
redevelopment by focusing on smaller, more manageable subareas within the City
Center. For example, focus efforts for residential development on areas where
residential development is most likely to occur. The consultant suggested the
"northern" frame area with potential because there housing already exists and
because it is an area with nice views. An example of commercial redevelopment
could focus on the "quadrant" around the pr~o~osed Sound Transit facility, the
Mall and/or Mall and properties north of 320 . The City could do a block-by-
block analysis of potential areas
Memo to FEDRAC
August 22, 2002
Page 5 of 5
· The community should not perceive that the SeaTac Mall should be in
competition with Southcenter or Tacoma Mall, It isn't. It should find its own
market niche and cater to that. The Mall representatives, said it could be further
developed.as a "lifestyle center," such as University Village.
· The preliminary proposal being worked on by'staff to require housing or office or
multistory development together with,large commercial developments should be
sure to include flexibility. Housing atop certain big-box retailers may not be
feasible, while housing atop other types of commercial may work. Perhaps the
code provision ought to include an option that allows housing elsewhere on site.
· The consultant mentioned that, above all, a developer is looking for predictability,
consistency, timeliness, stability and "no surprises" in the permitting system.
This can go even further than some smaller financial incentives (such as waiving
permit fees) in partnering with developers.
· Attendees brought up the related notions that interpretation of zoning provisions
needs to be consistent, as well as the idea that perhaps a permit coordinator or
problem-resolution coordinator could exist within Community Development.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
September 23, 2003
Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee
Patricia A. ~~ City Attorney
David H. Mosel~?(~it~y ~anager
Code Amendment Updating Chapter 9, Licenses and Business
Registration.
Backqround:
Under RCW 35.21.692, the Washington State Legislature has preempted the City's
ability to regulate message practitioners. The proposed amendment to Chapter 9, Article
IX reflects the changes in state law. The modifications are necessary to ensure
consistent enforcement of the laws.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Finance, Economic Development, and Regional Affairs
Committee approve the proposed amendments to Chapter 9, Article IX of the Federal
Way City Code and forward to full Council for consideration at the October 21,2003, City
Council meeting.
APPROVAL BY COMMITTEE:
Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member
K:\agnditem\fedrac\massage practitioners.2003
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTIONS OF
ARTICLE IX TO CHAPTER 9 OF THE FEDERAL WAY CITY
CODE REGARDING MASSAGE PRACTITIONERS
(AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 95-229).
WHEREAS, regulation of massage businesses is necessary to preven
activities that are detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, and the general welfare o
the citizens of the City of Federal Way, and
WHEREAS, regulation of massage businesses is necessary to reduc(
significant criminal activity, including prostitution and breaches of the peace, that hav(
historically and regularly occurred in the massage business, and,
WHEREAS, the Washington State Board of Massage now regulate,.
massage practitioners,
WHEREAS, the State Legislature has determined under RCW 35.21.69:
that a state licensed massage practitioner will not be subject to additional licensim
requirements not currently imposed on similar health care providers, such as physic~
therapists or occupational therapists, and,
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council has determined it is in the bes
interest of the public to revise the Federal Way City Code in regards to messag~
practitioners for consistent enforcement of state laws, and,
WHEREAS the Federal Way City Code needs to comply with the revisions t~
ORD # , PAGE 1
the state law regarding massage practitioners,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL
WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Amendment. Chapter 9, Article IX, Section 9-472 of the Federal
Way City Code is hereby amended as follows:
9-472 License for massage practitioners.
It is unlawful for any person to perform a massage or represent himself or herself as a
massage practitioner without f;-"*
~,~,,,,~,,~,*;*; .... ,,~,,~; ....... ,,,~ being in possession of a current, valid Washington State
massage practitioner's license. (Ord. No. 95-229, ~ 1, 3-21-95)
SECTION 2. Amendment. Chapter 9, Adicle IX, Section 9~75 of the
Federal Way City Code is hereby amended as follows:
9~75 License fees.
(a) Amount of fee. Applicants granted a license under this chapter shall pay to the city
the following fees prior to the issuance of their license:
Massage Business $15.00 per year
~ass~ge ~n~ger $J5.00 per year
Annual Renewal Fee SJ 6.00 per year
~ss~fle Pr~ctJtioner (not employee of reflJstere~ m~ss~qe business): flener~l business
ORD # ., PAGE 2
license requirements of Chapter 9, Article II app!y.
(b) Late penalty. A late penalty shall be charged on all applications for renewal of a
license received later than seven working days after the expiration date of such license.
The amount of such penalty is fixed as follows:
Days Past Due Additional Percentage of License Fees
8 - 30 25%
31 - 60 50%
61 and over 100%
(Ord. No. 95-229, § 1,3-21-95)
SECTION 3. Amendment. Chapter 9, Article IX, Section 9-476 of the
Federal Way City Code is hereby amended as follows:
9-476 License applications.
(a) Massage business. All applications for a massage business license or license
renewal shall be submitted in the name of the person or entity proposing to conduct
such massage business on the business premises, shall be signed by such person or
his or her legally authorized agent, and notarized or certified as true under penalty of
perjury. All applications shall be submitted on a form supplied by the city clerk, which
shall require the following information:
(1) The name, residence address, residence telephone number, date and place of birth
driver's license number, and Social Security number of the applicant if the applicant is
ORD # , PAGE 3
an individual or tax identification number if the applicant is a corporation or other entity;
(2) The business name, address and telephone number of the establishment;
(3) The names, addresses, telephone numbers and social security numbers of any
partners, corporate officers, or shareholders who own 10 percent or more of the
business, or other persons who have a substantial interest or management
responsibilities in connection with the business, specifying the interest or management
responsibility of each. For the purpose of this subsection "substantial interest" shall
mean ownership of 10 percent or more of the business, or any other kind of contribution
to the business of the same or greater size;
(4) The name of the landlord or property owner of the property on which the business is
situated.
ORD # , PAGE 4
nhnfnnr~nh and d~f~ nf hiffh- nr
c, A current
(~h) Massage manager. All applications for a massage manager's license or license
ronewal shall bo si~ned by tho applicant and notadzod or ce~ifiod to be truo undor
ponalty of pedu~. All applications shall bo submi~od on a form suppliod by the city
clork, which shall roquim, at a minimum, tho followin~ information:
(~) lhe applicant's name, residence address, residence telephone number, date and
ORD # , PAGE 5
place of birth, driver's license number and social security number;
(2) A letter, dated no more than 30 days prior to the date of the submission of the
application, from the owner of the business indicating intent to employ the applicant on
a specified date;
(3) Written proof that the applicant is 18 years of age or older as provided for in
subsection (b)(3) of this section;
(4) The mailing address and street address of all places within the city of Federal Way
at which the massage manager will provide services. The massage manager shall notify
the city clerk, in writing, of any changes in, or additions to, the location of such services
within 14 days of any such change or addition.
(~_c) Background checks. All applications submitted pursuant to this chapter will be
submitted to a background check in accordance with the procedures of the Federal
Way police department. (Ord. No. 95-229, § 1, 3-21-95)
SECTION 4. Amendment. Chapter 9, Article IX, Section 9-477 of the
Federal Way City Code is hereby amended as follows:
9-477 Standards for denial of application for license.
(a) Massage business license. The city clerk may deny any massage business license
request if he or she determines that the applicant has:
(1) Made any material misstatement in the application for a license;
(2) Proposed a place of business or operates a business which fails to comply with all
applicable requirements of this Code including without limitation the zoning, building,
ORD # , PAGE 6
health and fire codes and all other applicable local, state, or federal laws, rules or
regulations;
(3) Had any convictions which have a direct connection with the licensed activity
including, but not limited to, theft, prostitution, promotion or permitting prostitution,
sexual offenses, consumer fraud, massage practitioner or massage manager violation,
or obscenity within five years prior to the date of such application; or
(4) Had a massage business license denied, revoked or suspended by the city, or any
other jurisdiction within five years prior to the date of such application.
......... ~ ................. ~,~_. ...... ~_ ......... ~ .......... ~ ........................
ORD # , PAGE 7
!~,O~^l 'i'itln I ~ ae nn~.Ai nvletinn nr hnr~affnr amnndn4 ~A~hlr-h li~-nn~z~
(6b) Massage manager license. The city clerk may deny any massage mnnager license
applied for under the provisions of this chapter if the city clerk determines that the
applicant has:
(1} Made any mnterial misstatement in the application for n license: or
(2) Had any convictions which have a direct connection with the licensed activity
including, but not limited to, theft, prostitution, sexunl offense, consumer fraud,
mnssage practitioner or manager violntion, or obscenity, within five yenrs prior to the
dnte of
(3) Had n massnge practitioner or massage manager license denied, revoked or
suspended by the city or nny other jurisdiction within five years prior to the dnte of
nppliaation: or
(4) Had a Washington State mnssage practitioner's license suspended or revoked
which had been issued pursuant to Chapter 18.108 ROW, ns now existing or hereafter
amended or had any professional license revoked which hnd been issued pursuant to
P, OW Title 18, ns now existing or hereafter amended, which license nuthorized
performing massage treatments.
(al_o} Effect of license denial. If any applicnnt has a license denied bnsed upon a
conviction clnssified as a felony, or any other nonfelony convictions, pursuant to this
ORD # , PAGE 8
section, a license shall not be granted within five years from the date of such denial. If
any applicant has a license denied for any other reason, a license shall not be granted
within three years from the date of such denial. (Ord. No. 95-229, § 1,3-21-95)
SECTION 5. Amendment. Chapter 9, Article IX, Section 9-478 of the
Federal Way City Code is hereby amended as follows:
9-478 Standards for suspension or revocation of license.
(a) Massage business license. The city clerk may revoke or suspend a massage
business liCense if he or she determines that the licensee has:
(1) Failed to comply with FWCC 9-501,9-502 or any of the other requirements of this
chapter; or
(2) Failed to comply with the applicable building, health, fire and/or zoning code
provisions or with any other applicable federal, state or local laws, rules or regulations;
or
(3) With knowledge employed persons who, within a period of the preceding five years
have been convicted of prostitution or consumer fraud stemming from activities
conducted on the licensed premises, or who have been arrested for such offenses and
which lead to such convictions;
(4) Had any convictions which have a direct connection with the licensed activity,
including but not limited to, consumer fraud, theft, controlled substances, prostitution,
permitting or promoting prostitution, sexual offenses, or obscenity; or
(5) Failed to comply with or done anything which constitutes a basis for denying a
ORD # ., PAGE 9
license application.
(b) Notice of violation. If the city clerk, the building official, or his or her agent
determines during an inspection that the condition of any massage business needs
correction, a written notice of violation shall be issued to the supervisor, manager,
owner, or person in charge specifying such violations. Those same violations shall be
remedied within 48 hours unless a later date is determined by the city clerk. Failure to
comply with any written notice of violation to make corrections may result in suspension
or revocation of the massage business license.
V~ ~1 ~1 I] ~1 I~ ~1 l~l .V~I/~llI~I l~ VI I~1 ~ or
/2~ D~;In4 fn ~nmnh~ ~;fh nr 4nnn an~4h;nn ~*;hi~h ~nn~fif~fn~ ha~;~ fnr 4nn~inn
(~) ~a~age manager license. T~e cit~ cler~ ma~ ~u~pen~ or revoke an~ massage
manager license if ~e or s~e ~etermine~ lhat t~e licensee
(1) Faile~ to compl~ with any of l~e operating requirement~ ~et fo~h in F~GC g-501
an~ g-502 or faile~ to compl~ wit~ an~ of t~e ot~er requirements of t~is c~apter; or
ORD # , PAGE 10
(2) Had any convictions which have a direct connection with the licensed activity
including, but not limited to, theft, prostitution, consumer fraud, obscenity, or sexual
offenses; or
(3) Failed to comply with or done anything which constitutes a basis for denying a
license.
(ed_) Effect of license revocation. If any applicant under this chapter has his or her
license revoked, a license shall not be granted under this chapter for a period of at leas'
five years from the date of such revocation.
(re) Duration of license suspension. The city clerk may suspend a license for no more
than six months. (Ord. No. 95-229, § 1,3-21-95)
SECTION 6. Amendment. Chapter 9, Article IX, Section 9-479 of the
Federal Way City Code is hereby amended as follows:
9-479 Transfer of licenses and change of location.
(a) Massage business. No massage business license issued under this chapter shall be
transferable from one person or entity to another person or entity. Upon the sale or
transfer of an interest greater than 50 percent in a massage business, a license shall
become null and void. A new application shall be made by any person desiring to
operate or maintain the establishment and shall include a release of interest statement
from the previous licensee and a signed lease or rental agreement for the
establishment.
ORD # , PAGE 11
SECTION 7. Amendment. Chapter 9, Article IX, Section 9-502 of the
Federal Way City Code is hereby amended as follows:
9-502 Standards of conduct/operation.
(a) Owner/manager requirements. The following standards of conduct and operation
shall be adhered to by the owner, proprietor, manager, or person in charge of any
massage business:
(1) Any person who is employed to give a massage must be at least 18 years of age
and be validly licensed as a massage practitioner pursuant to ,~,~o., ,,....~,o,.,.,, ,,-,~.-., .... ,~, ,,.,4 state
law.
(2) At all times during the hours a massage business is open for business, and/or
during the presence of patrons, at least one validly licensed massage practitioner must
be on the premises.
ORD # , PAGE 12
(3) Any person who is employed by a massage business must present documentation
that he or she has attained the age of 18 years when an inspection pursuant to this
chapter is conducted. Proper documentation shall be as described in FWCC 9-
476(b)(3).
(4) Provide that all doors in such premises, excluding doors in the office and storage
rooms, unless such doors provide access to service areas, are so equipped that they
may not be fastened shut so as to prevent reasonable access by such authorities who
announce their authority to enter prior to inspection.
(b) All licenses. The following standards of conduct and operation shall be adhered to
by all licensees:
(1) All licensees shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, including
all safety and sanitation requirements and the city's building, fire and zoning codes;
(2) All licensees shall allow any police officer, the city manager or his or her designee,
or a representative from the Seattle-King County health department or the Federal Way
fire department entry to the premises during the hours the massage business is open
for business, upon presentation of proper identification, for purposes of inspecting the
premises;
(3) Maintain business receipts showing the date of service(s) given, the type of
service(s) rendered and the name and city license number of the employee rendering
the service(s). These business receipts shall be retained for a period of three years
after the date of the service(s), and shall be open to inspection by the city clerk and the
ORD # , PAGE 13
Federal Way police department;
m,'~inf,'~in in nnnrl efnnrtinn o r,~ ~rrnnf %AI,"ac',hinn'l'nn C~f,-~fn m,'~oo,'~rnn nr,~r, flflnnz~r'o llr-exnez~-
(o54_) Post in a prominent place a list of all services offered with a brief description of
what the service entails along with the costs of such service(s). All business
transactions with the customers must be conducted in accordance with the said posted
list;
(6_5) Not distribute or consume any alcoholic beverages and/or controlled substances
on licensed premises; and
(7-6) Not allow any unlicensed massage.
(c) Minors. It shall be unlawful for the owner, manager, or any massage practitioner, or
any employee or agent to admit anyone under the age of 18 years of age and permit
them to remain in or about such premises, unless such person is accompanied by or
presents the written consent of his or her parent or legal guardian.
(d) Prostitution. It shall be unlawful for any owner, manager, massage practitioner, or
any employee or agent to knowingly harbor, admit, receive or permit to be or remain in
or about such premises any prostitute or any person under the influence of any narcotic
or dangerous drug or to perform or allow to be performed any act, massage or
manipulation in which contact is made with another's genital areas either by hand, body
or by any mechanical device or object, whether it is covered or uncovered, clothed or
unclothed, in whole or in part.
ORD # , PAGE 14
(e) Clothing required. It shall be unlawful for any owner, manager, massage practitioner
or any employee or agent to disrobe or be partially disrobed in the presence of another
while in any facility defined in this chapter.
(f) Supervision - Inspection. The owner or manager shall have the premises supervised
at all times when open for business. Rooms and stalls used for the purpose of massage
shall be constructed in such a manner as to permit inspection. (Ord. No. 95-229, § 1, 3-
21-95)
SECTION 8. Severabilit¥. The provisions of this ordinance are declare¢
separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision
section, or portion of this ordinance or the invalidity of the application thereof to any persor
or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the
validity of its application to other persons or circumstances.
SECTION 9. Ratification. Any and all acts consistent with the authority an{
prior to the effective date of this ordinance are hereby ratified and affirmed.
SECTION 10. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be
in force five days from its passage, approval and publication, as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this
,2003.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
day o
ORD # , PAGE 15
MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
ORD # , PAGE 16
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
September 23, 2003
Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee
Patricia A. Richardson, City Attorney ' ~.~.~
~Jcdh aH~ i nMi'~~~p o ii cle~ Revisr~er
~,-
Background:
In 1992, the Federal Way City Council adopted Purchasing Policies. The policies set
forth the dollar amounts allowed by state law for purchasing procedures such as the
small works roster, competitive bidding, and recycling procurement.
Subsequently, the State Legislature has modified the state laws regarding public
contracts. Most notably, the threshold dollar amounts for small works roster and
competitive bidding have increased.
In order to be more efficient and timely with changes in state law, the proposed
amendments to the Purchasing Policies incorporate the state law by reference, including
all future amendments, additions and deletions. By incorporating the state laws, as
Council has previously done with the Criminal Code in Chapter 6, Council will not need to
review and adopt all recent state law modifications at the end of each Legislative
Session.
The proposed amendments also reorganize the Purchasing Policies. The attached chad
shows the corresponding state law, and the proposed amendments.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Finance, Economic Development, and Regional Affairs
Committee approve the proposed amendments to the Purchasing Policies and forward to
full Council for consideration at the October 7, 2003, City Council meeting.
APPROVAL BY COMMITTEE:
Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member
K:\agnditem\fedrac\purchasing policies.2003
II
Definition of Public'
Work
Prdfessional Service
.. COntracts
39.04.010
35A.40.210
35.22.62Q.(,;1)
23
Cooperative Purchasing 39.34 . '~!7' :r''.
' equ~ment.(ve~16f list)
Sole source'.': 3~.A.40.210. ,, 19 ''
(exception) .. 39.04,280(1)-{3)
Bid solic!tation records ' . ;11 ~ ':.
Public work - 35.A.40.210 11
publication requirement 35.22.620(2)
39.04.020
Public work - bid limits 35.A.40.210 10
35.22.620(3)
35A.40.210 10
: 35.22.620(2)
Public work - work by
city employees
Bonds and bid security 26
39.08.010
39.08.030
Award or rejection of 11
bids :
Determining lowest 43.19.1911 12
responsible bidder
Administrative ' 22
Procedures
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PURCHASING POLICIES
Section 1.
Section 2.
Section 3.
Section 4.
Section 5.
Section 6.
Section 7.
Section 8.
Section 9.
Section 10.
Section 11.
Section 12.
Section 13.
Section 14.
Section 15.
Section 16.
Section 17.
Section 18.
Section 19.
Section 20.
Section 21.
Section 22.
Section 23.
Section 24.
Section 25.
Section 26.
Section 27.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Purpose.
Application.
Federal funds.
Grants.
Professional service contracts.
Responsibility for purchasing.
Authority to execute.
Routine expenses.
Recycling procurement policy.
COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS
Bid limits.
Competitive bidding.
General standards for determining lowest responsible bidder.
Cancellation of requests for bids or requests for proposals.
Specifications.
City procurement records.
Unauthorized purchases.
EXCEPTIONS TO COMPETITIVE BIDDING REQUIREMENT
Cooperative purchasing.
Emergency procurement.
Other exemptions.
MATERIALS, SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT
Small purchases.
Inspection and testing.
Purchases for special events.
PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS
Definition of public works.
Plans and specifications - Estimates - Publication - Emergencies.
Small works roster.
Bonds and bid security - Noncollnsion affidavit -- Insurance.
Administrative procedures.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 1. Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to protect and advance the public interest by providing for
the fair and equitable treatment of all persons involved in the purchasing process, by maximizing
the purchasing value of public funds, by providing safeguards for maintaining a purchasing
system of quality and integrity, and by following state law.
Section 2. Application.
This chapter applies to the award of contracts by the City for (1) purchases of materials,
supplies, and equipment;(2) public works and improvements; and (3) non-professional services.
This chapter does not apply to (1) the reimbursement of business expenses incurred by
employees as governed by Ordinance No. 90-25 as now or hereafter amended; (2) purchase
and/or lease of real estate; (3) lease agreements for materials, supplies and equipment unless the
agreement is in excess of twenty thousand dollars or for more than three (3) years duration; and
(4) professional and non-professional service contracts as defined in Section 5.
Section 3. Federal Funds.
When a purchase involves the expenditure of federal funds,
conducted in accordance with any applicable federal law or regulation.
purchasing shall be
Section 4. Grants.
Nothing in this chapter shall prevent thc city from complying with
conditions of any grant, gift or bequest which is otherwise consistent with law.
the terms and
Section 5. Professional service contracts.
Professional services, including contracts for architectural, engineering, legal and
consulting services, are not subject to the requirements of this chapter. Contracts for architectural
and engineering services shall be awarded in accordance with Chapter 39.80 RCW. For purposes
of this section, "professional services" are those services involving labor, skill, education and
special knowledge and where the labor and skill involved is predominately mental or intellectual
rather than physical or manual.
Section 6. Responsibility for purchasing.
A. General. The director of finance or designee shall be responsible for all city purchasing~
under this resolution except where otherwise provided. The director or designee shall be head o4
the purchasing division of the fi,~ance department and shall administer the purchasing policie~
(hereinafter "Purchasing Policies ). /
1
B. Duties. In accordance with the Purchasing Policies, the director of finance or designee
shall:
(1) Purchase or supervise the purchase of all materials, supplies, equipment and
nonprofessional services and award of all public works and improvement contracts by the city;
(2) Sell, trade or otherwise dispose of surplus personal property belonging to the city.
The city manager shall be responsible for the disposal of real property;
(3) Establish and maintain programs for specifications development, contract
administration and inspection and acceptance, in cooperation with the city departments using the
items purchased;
(4) Propose operational procedures consistent with the Purchasing Policies relating to
the execution of his/her duties. Such procedures shall be followed by all city departments. These
operational procedures are subject to prior approval of the city manager. The city manager may
amend the procedures as he or she deems appropriate; and
(5) Determine liability and property damage insurance requirements, including but not
limited to coverage requirements, limits of liability, necessary endorsements and other matters
relating to insurance, for any contract entered into by the city under this chapter.
Section 7. Authority to execute.
Every contract under the Purchasing Policies where the annual cost to the city or the
annual revenue to be received by the city for such contracts is:
A. Twenty thousand dollars or less, the city manager or his/her designee is authorized to
sign such contracts on behalf of the city;
B. More than twenty thousand dollars, approval of the city council is required for such
contracts.
Section 8. Routine expenses.
Routine expenses such as utilities charges, claims and judgments, witness fees,
governmental taxes and governmental fees for licenses and permits may be acquired, ordered or
paid in the best interests of the City within budget appropriations or other council authorization
therefor.
Section 9. Recycling procurement policy.
A. Intent. In accordance with RCW 35A.40.210, 35.22.620(10) and 39.30.40 including all
future amendments, additions and deletion, the City of Federal Way finds it desirable to adopt a
procurement policy promoting the use of recycled products and recyclable products by the City
of Federal Way departments, thereby stimulating the demand for these products and helping to
develop markets for materials that have been diverted from the solid waste stream.
B. Use of recycled Materials. All City of Federal Way departments shall use recycled
products and recyclable products whenever practicable and reasonable.
C. Duty of the Director of Finance or Designee. The director of finance or designee shall
establish and maintain a list of recycled and recyclable products that are available to be
purchased by departments whenever practicable.
COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS
Section 10. Bid Limits.
The competitive bidding process outlined in Section 11 is required whenever the
estimated cost of a purchase of materials, supplies and equipment, or a contract for public work
or improvement (including the cost of materials, supplies, equipment and labor), will exceed the
sums as set forth in RCW 35A.40.210 and 35.22.620(3) including all future amendments,
additions and deletions.
Whenever the estimated cost of the materials, supplies and equipment is less than the bid
limit as stated above, purchases shall be made in a manner authorized by Section 24 (small
purchases).
Whenever the estimated cost of the public work or improvement is less than the bid limit
as stated above a contract for the public work or improvement shall be awarded in the manner
authorized by Section 21 (small works roster). The public work or improvement may be
performed by city employees within the limits and to the extent authorized by state law.
Section 11. Competitive bidding.
A. General. Any purchase of material, supplies, and equipment, or any contract for public
works or improvements where the cost thereof exceeds the bid limit in Section 10 shall be by
competitive bidding in accordance with RCW 35A.40.210 and 35.22.620(6) including all future
amendments, additions and deletions, except for purchases and contracts made pursuant to
Sections 17 (cooperative purchasing), 18 (emergency) and 19 (sole source).
B. Request for Bids. A request for bids shall be issued which shall include the specifications
and the contractual terms and conditions applicable to the procurement.
C. Public Notice. Public notice of the request for bids shall be given not less than fourteen
(14) calendar days prior to the date set forth therein for the opening of bids unless another
timeline is deemed necessary by the director of finance or designee. Such notice shall be
published, at least once each week for two (2) consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general
circulation. The public notice shall state the date and time of bid opening. Bids not received by
the date and time stated for bid opening will not be accepted or considered.
D. Bid Opening. Bids shall be submitted sealed to the office of the director of finance or as
otherwise specified at any time within regular business hours and shall be identified as bids or
the envelope. Bids shall be opened in public by the director of finance or designee at the tim~
and place stated in the request for bids. The amount of each bid, and such other relevan~
information as the director of finance or designee deems appropriate, together with the name o:
each bidder, shall be announced and recorded. The record and each bid shall be open to public
inspection. The director of finance or designee shall tabulate the bids and submit them to thc
concerned department, which will make appropriate recommendations to the city manager.
E. Bid Evaluation. Bids shall be evaluated based on the specifications and other relevan
evaluation criteria set forth in the bid specifications. The evaluation criteria shall be objectivel~
measurable whenever possible, and may include such factors as discounts, transportation costs,
and total or life cycle costs, inspection or testing which has been done of the product bid, quality,
workmanship, delivery time, and suitability for a particular purpose.
F. Bid irregularities. Except where otherwise provided in these Purchasing Policies, bids
containing irregularities will be accepted by the city for consideration. Any action concerning the
bid(s) containing irregularities shall be at the discretion of the city manager and/or city council in
accordance with the provisions of law. The call for bids for all bids shall state the reserved right
of the city to reject any and all bids and to waive irregularities in any provided that no bidder
shall be permitted to gain unfair advantage over other bidders by action of the city council
pertaining to this section.
G. Correction or withdrawal of errors; Cancellation of Awards. Correction or withdrawal of
inadvertent errors in bids before or after bid opening, or cancellation of awards or contracts
based on such bid mistakes, may be permitted by the city to the extent allowed by law. Mistakes
discovered before bid opening may be modified or the bid may be withdrawn by written or
telegraphic notice received in the office designated in the request for bids prior to the time set for
opening. After bid opening, corrections in or withdrawal of bids shall be permitted only to the
extent that the bidder can show by clear and convincing evidence that a mistake was made, the
nature of the mistake, and the bid price actually intended. All decisions to permit the correction
or withdrawal of bids after bid opening, or to cancel awards or contracts based on bid mistakes,
will be made by the city manager.
H. Award or rejection of bids. The recommended bids over twenty thousand dollars shall be
submitted to the city council by the city manager. The city council may award the bid to the
lowest responsive, responsible bidder in accordance with Section 12, or may reject all bids in its
sole discretion. The contract shall be considered and/or awarded to the lowest responsible bidder
whose bid meets the specifications and evaluation criteria set forth in the request for bids.
I. Recalling for bids. The city council may reject any or all bids and/or call for further bids.
If no responsive, responsible bid is received on the first call, the city may readvertise and make a
second call, or may enter into a contract without any further call.
Section 12. General standards for determining lowest responsible bidder.
In accordance with RCW 43.19.1911 including all future amendments, additions and
deletions to determine the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in addition to price, thc
following may be considered:
A. The ability, capacity and skill of the bidder to perform thc contract;
B. Whether the bidder can perform thc contract promptly, or within the time specified,
without delay or interference;
C. The reputation, experience and efficiency of the bidder;
D. Thc quality of performance of previous contracts by the bidder;
E. The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws and ordinances relating to
contracts or services;
F. The sufficiency of the financial resources and ability of the bidder to perform the
contract;
G. The ability of the bidder to provide future maintenance and service for the use of the
subject of the contract;
H. The number and scope of conditions attached to the bid.
Section 13. Cancellation of requests for bids or requests for proposals.
In accordance with RCW 43.19.1911 including all future amendments, additions and
deletions a request for bids may be canceled in the discretion of the director of finance or
designee. Thc masons therefor shall be made part of thc contract file. Each request for bids
issued by the city shall state that the request may be canceled. Notice of cancellation shall be sent
to all parties that have been provided with a copy of the request. The notice shall identify the
request for bids and state briefly the reasons for cancellation.
Section 14. Specifications.
A. Maximum Practicable Competition. All specifications shall be drafted so as to promote
overall economy for the purposes intended and encourage maximum free and open competition
in satisfying the city's needs. The policy enunciated in this section applies to all specifications
including but not limited to those prepared for the city by architects, engineers, designers, and
drafters.
B. "Brand Name or Equivalent" Specification. Brand name or equivalent specifications may
be used when the director of finance or designee determines that use of a brand name or
equivalent specification is in the city's best interest.
C. Brand Name Specification. Because use of a brand name specification is often restrictive
of competition, it may be used only when the director of finance or designee makes a written
determination that only the identified brand name item or items will satisfy the city's needs.
D. Experience Clause Restrictions. Experience clauses requiring prospective bidders to have
a record of satisfactory operation or performance may only be used if such requirements have
been adequately justified in writing and approved by the director of finance or designee.
Section 15. City procurement records.
A. Contract File. All determinations and other written records pertaining to the request to
bid, award, or performance of a contract shall be maintained for the city in a contract file by the
director of finance or designee and/or city clerk.
B. Retention of Procurement Records. All procurement records shall be retained and
disposed of by the city in accordance with state law and city ordinances, regulations and
guidelines. If a contract is being funded in whole or in part by assistance from a federal agency,
then all procurement records pertaining to that contract shall be maintained in accordance with
any applicable requirements of federal law.
Section 16. Unauthorized purchases.
Except as provided in these Purchasing Policies and except as authorized by operational
procedures adopted by the finance director or designee, no city employee shall make an'
purchase or contract within the purview of these Purchasing Policies other than through the
director of finance or designee. Any purchase or contract made contrary to the provisions hereof
shall not be approved by any city officer and the city shall not be bound thereby, except as may
be required or provided by law.
EXEMPTIONS TO COMPETITIVE BIDDING REQUIREMENTS
Section 17. Cooperative purchasing.
The director of finance or designee is authorized to recommend to the city council that it
join in cooperative purchasing arrangements with other public agencies similarly authorized.
Any cooperative purchasing agreement shall comply with RCW 39.34.030(3)including all future
amendments, addition and deletions and set forth fully the purposes, powers, rights, objectives
and responsibilities of the contracting parties. Any cooperative purchasing agreement shall be
governed by the requirements of state law in regard to competitive bidding when applicable. In
addition, the director of finance or designee may utilize existing contracts or proposed
solicitations of other local, state, or federal agencies to procure materials, supplies, and
equipment for the City consistent with legal requirements if such methods of procurement would
foster economy and efficiency.
Section 18. Emergency procurement.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Purchasing Polices, the city manager or
his/her designated agent may, in accordance with RCW 35A.40.210, 35.22.620(6), and
39.04.280 including all future amendments, additions and deletions, make or authorize others to
make emergency procurement of materials, supplies, equipment, or construct public works
projects without complying with the competitive requirements of these Purchasing Policies when
there exists a threat to public health, welfare, or safety or where the city may suffer a substantial
monetary loss by reason of the time required to follow regular purchasing procedures; provided,
that such emergency procurement shall be made with such competition as is practicable under
the circumstances. A written determination of the basis for the emergency and for the selection
of the particular contractor shall be included in the contract file. As soon as practicable, a record
of each emergency procurement shall be made and shall set forth the contractor's name, the
amount and type of the contract, and a listing of the item(s) procured under the contract, which
shall be reported to the city council.
Section 19. Other exemptions.
A. The finance director or designee is authorized to make open market purchases without
obtaining competitive bids or quotations therefor in accordance with RCW 35A.40.210,
35.22.620(6) and 39.04.280 including all future amendments, additions and deletions under the
following conditions:
Items of Special Design. When an item required is of special design, shape or
manufacture to match or fit in with an existing installation and competitive bidding is
impracticable;
Surplus or Distress Sales. When it is possible to procure obvious bargains in surplus or
distress material, supplies or equipment.
Items for quick Delivery_. When the obtaining of competitive bids or quotations will cause
delay resulting in an appreciable loss to the city;
B. Small Items Not Stocked, Blanket Purchase Orders. The director of finance or designee is
authorized to establish blanket purchase orders with local vendors for the purchase of items
which are not stocked by the departments of the city and are available at usual market prices.
Such local vendors shall be selected on the basis of best overall price policies, breadth and depth
of stocks and delivery service.
C. Sole source procurement. A contract for the purchase of materials, supplies or equipment
may be awarded without complying with the bidding requirements of this chapter when the
purchasing manager determines in writing, after conducting a good faith review of available
sources, that there is only one source for the required materials, supplies or equipment. The
director of finance or designee shall conduct negotiations, as appropriate, as to price, terms, and
delivery time. A record of sole source procurement shall be maintained that lists each
contractor's name, the amount and type of each contract, and a listing of the items(s) procured
under each contract.
MATERIALS, SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT
Section 20. Small purchases.
A. General. Any purchase of materials, supplies or equipment not exceeding the bid limit
specified in Section 10 shall be considered a "small purchase" and shall be made in accordance
with RCW 39.04.190 including all future amendments, additions or deletions. The finance
director or designee shall adopt purchase procedures whereby the requirements of Section 11
shall not apply. Insofar as it is practical, three businesses shall be solicited to submit quotations.
The finance director or designee shall keep a record of all small purchases and quotations
submitted in competition thereon and such records shall be open for public inspection during
regular office hours. The finance director or designee shall consider and/or award the purchase
order on small purchases to such vendor as the finance director or designee determines to have
submitted the lowest responsive, responsible quotation, in accordance with the provisions of this
chapter.
B. Filing of statements on awards to other than vendor submitting lowest quotation. Whet
the award for a small purchase is not given to the vendor submitting the lowest quotation, ~
statement of the reasons for placing the order elsewhere shall be prepared and filed with the othe~
papers relating to the transaction.
C. Reiection of quotations. The finance director or desginee shall have the authority to rejec~
all quotations or parts thereof, with regard to a small purchase of any materials, supplies, oi
equipment when he/she determines the public interest will be served thereby, and upor
concurrence with department directors and upon rejection of such quotations shall include thC
reason therefor in the records of the transaction.
Section 21. Inspection and testing.
The director of finance or designee shall inspect or supervise the inspection of all
deliveries materials, supplies, or equipment to determine their conformance with the
specifications set forth in the request to bid.
Inspection by Using Department. The director of finance or designee may authorize a
using department having the staff and facilities for adequate inspection to inspect all deliveries
made to such using departments, under operational procedures.
Tests. The director of finance or designee may require chemical and physical tests of
samples submitted with bids and samples of deliveries which are necessary to determine their
quality and conformance with the specifications. In the performance of such tests, he/she shall
have the authority to make use of laboratory facilities of any outside laboratory.
Section 22. Purchases for special events.
The city manager may promulgate procedures to govern the purchase of supplies, such as
food, beverages, decorations and awards, for public events and employee activities, including
employee of the year recognition, volunteer recognition and ceremonial openings of public
facilities.
PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS
Section 23. Definition of public works.
RCW 39.04.010 including all future amendments, additions and deletions is incorporated
by reference.
Section 24. Plans and specifications - Estimates -Publication - Emergencies.
When it is determined that a public work or improvement is .necessary, plans,
specifications, or both thereof and an estimate of the cost of such work shall be filed with the
director of finance or designee. The plans, specifications and estimates of cost shall be approved
by the director of finance or designee and the original draft or a certified copy filed with the
director of finance or designee before further action is taken.
If it is determined that it is necessary or advisable to execute such public work or
improvement by any means, e.g., force account, or method other than by contract, and it appears
that the estimated probable cost of executing the work will exceed the amount as set forth in
RCW 39.04.020 including all future amendments, additions and deletions, then, at least fifteen
days before the work is begun, the director of finance or designee shall cause such estimate,
together with a description of the work, to be published at least once in a newspaper of general
circulation within the city; except that when any emergency requires the immediate execution of
such public work or improvement, upon finding of the existence of an emergency by the
authority having power to direct such public work or improvement to be done, duly entered of
record, publication of description and estimate may be made within seven days after the
commencement of the work.
Section 25. Small works roster.
A small works roster in accordance with RCW 39.04.155 including all future
amendments, additions and deletions may be used for construction of a public work or
improvement, as an alternative to general competitive bidding requirements set out in Section 11.
The finance director or designee shall maintain a list of contractors who have requested
placement on the roster and who are properly licensed or registered to perform work in the State
of Washington. Insofar as it is practical, five businesses shall be solicited to submit bids. Once a
bidder has been offered an opportunity to bid, that bidder will not be offered another opportunity
to bid until all other appropriate contractors on the roster have been offered such an opportunity.
Section 26. Bonds and bid security - Noncollusion affidavit -Insurance.
Bid Security. Requirement for Bid Security. Bid security shall be required for all
competitive bidding for public work or improvement contracts in accordance with RCW
39.08.010 and 39.08.030 including all future amendments, additions and deletions. Bid security
shall be of a type and in a form established by the director of finance or designee and approved
by the city attorney or designee, which may include a bond provided by a surety company
authorized to do business in this state, or the equivalent in cash, cashier's or certified check and
shall be included in the bid package. Bid security shall be required on bids for materials, supplies
and equipment only if determined necessary by the director of finance or designee.
Amount of Bid Security. Bid security shall be in an amount equal to at least five percent
of the amount of the bid or in another amount as determined by the purchasing manager.
Rejection of Bids for Noncompliance with Bid Security Requirements. When the request
for bid requires submittal of bid security, noncompliance will result in rejection of the bid.
Withdrawal of Bids. If a bidder is permitted to withdraw its bid before award as provided
in Section 1 I(G), the bidder's bid security shall be returned.
Contract Performance and Payment Bonds. When required -- Amounts. When a public
works or improvement contract is awarded as a result of a call for bids under Section 11 (H) of
these Purchasing Policies, the following bonds or security shall be delivered to the city and shall
become binding on the parties upon the execution of this contract:
A performance bond satisfactory to the city attorney or designee, executed by a suret7
company authorized to do business in this state or othelwvise secured in manner satisfactory t~
the city for an amount equal to one hundred percent of the price specified in the contract. /
A payment bond satisfactory to the city attorney or designee, executed by a surety
company authorized to do business in this state or otherwise secured in a manner satisfactory tO
the city for the protection of all persons supplying labor and material to the contractor or it,,
subcontractors for the performance of the work provided for in the contract. The bond shall be ir
an amount equal to one hundred percent of the price specified in the contract.
Authority to Require Additional Bonds. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limi
the authority of the city to require a performance bond or other security in addition to the bond.'
specified herein.
Noncollusion Affidavit. As part of any bid submitted, the bidder shall be required tr
warrant that the bid is a genuine bid and that he or she has not entered into collusion with an
9
other bidder or any other person by submitting with his or her bid an executed and notarized
noncollusion affidavit on a form approved by the city attorney.
Insurance. Contracts for public works and imprOvements shall contain such requirements
for the provision of insurance by the contractor as are determined by the director of finance or
designee.
Section 27. Administrative procedures.
The city manager may promulgate procedures for the purpose of administering public
works improvement contracts. Such procedures may define the levels of authority pertaining to
review and approval of contract change orders. The director of finance or designee is to report
change orders to the city council on a quarterly basis.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY PURCHASING POLICIES TO UPDATE THE
PURCHASING POLICIES BY INCORPORATING STATE LAWS.
WHEREAS, on December 17, 1991, the Federal Way City Council approved staff's
recommendation for Purchasing Policies; and
WHEREAS, the Purchasing Policies reference the specific dollar amounts that were
in effect under State Law in 1991; and
WHEREAS, over the years the State Legislature amended the dollar amounts in State
Law for various public contracts; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Federal Way find it is in the public's,
interest to incorporate State Law into the Purchasing Policies to be more efficient and timely witl:
modifications to State Law;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Federal Way adopts the attached
Purchasing Polices specifically incorporating State Law where applicable.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolutior
should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidit
Res. # , Page 1
or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence
clause or phrase of this resolution.
Section 3. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the
effective date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 4. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upor
passage by the Federal Way City Council.
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
WASHINGTON, this __ day of ,2003.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
ATTEST:
MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE
CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON, CITY ATTORNEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
k:~reso\Update Purchasing Policies
10/7/03
Res. #__, Page 2
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
Via:
From:
Subject:
September 26, 2003
Finance, Economic~ Development and Regional Affairs Committee
David H. Mose~~al~ager
Iwen Wang, M~'n~g~-n;nt S;r~ces Director
2003 Bond Call
BACKGROUND:
The City has budgeted for the early retirement of the $11.13 million principal balance of the 1993 Celebration
Park Acquisition Bond, carrying an average interest rate of 5.83%. Thc funding sources for this bond call is
from past and projected excess utility tax collections.
UTILITY TAX PROJECTION UPDATE:
The Committee is aware that the utility tax collections for this year are below our budget projections. Our
current estimate indicates that there could be a potential shortfall of $800,000 for 2003 from the estimated $7.7
million total utility tax revenue budgeted. The shortfall is attributable to a couple of reasons:
1. The revenue from the new 1% utility tax began on March 1, 2003 rather than January 1, 2003. This
delayed collection of the additional 1% is due to the 60 day notification requirement; the billing cycles
of the utilities; and potential reporting errors in the early months of the new tax. We are following up
with various companies to verify their reporting accuracy.
2. In addition to the delayed collection of the new 1% tax, the base 5% utility tax collection is slightly.
below projection. We expected the 5% to generate $6.25 million in 2003 (or $1.25 million for each 1%
tax), but the current estimate is the base 5% would generate $5.9 million in 2003 (or $1.18 million per
1% tax). In comparison, the 5% provided $6.1 million (or $1.22 million per 1% tax) in 2002. This is a
2% decline - the first time since the City instituted the utility tax in 1995. The key factors attributed to
the decline are the 23% decrease in natural gas rates based on wholesale market in September 2002;
and the leveling off of growth in the cellular phone industry. As you are probably aware, Puget Sound
Energy recently announced rate increases in 2003 for both natural gas and electric services. These rate
increases took effect too late to make any significant impact on the 2003 revenues, but will help the
2004 collections.
As discussed at previous committee meetings, we remain confident that the long-term outlook for the utility tax
is positive, and that the $1.25 million projected for each 1% utility tax is very achievable in the near future.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
While the long-term outlook for the utility tax is positive, we do have a shortfall in 2003 to completely retire
the $11.13 million bond. However, the city also maintains a prefunding reserve that currently has
approximately $4 million (this amount is adjusted annually based on the next year's debt service requirement)
in the Debt Service Fund. This reserve is currently being invested at a market return rate that is much lOwer
than the cost of the outstanding bonds. Therefore, staff recommends that the city proceed with the full
retirement of the Celebration Park Acquisition Bond by using a small portion of the prefunding reserve on a
temporary basis, and continue to transfer excess utility tax to the debt service fund and/or use any excess PEET
that has not been allocated to capital projects to makeup the 2003 utility tax transfer shortfall in 2003 and 2004.
Because the bond call and the utility tax transfer are both in the adopted budget, no Council action is required
to proceed. The portion of the utility tax transfer not fulfilled in 2003 will be carried forward into 2004 as part
of the carry-forward budget adjustment that will be brought to Council early next year.
\~c fwmain\vol 1 \data\ms\finance'ffincommf12003\0923~2003 bond call.doc
CITY OF ~
Federal Way
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
From:
Via:
Subject:
September 24, 2003
Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee
Tho Kraus, Finance Manager
David Moseley, City Manager
August 2003 Monthly Financial Report
Action Requested:
Accept the August 2003 Monthly Financial Report and forward to the October 7th Council meeting for full Council
approval.
K:~FIN~MFR~I FRFEDRACCVR.DOC
J-1
MEETING DATE: October 7, 2003 ITEM#
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: August 2003 Monthly Financial Report
CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT:
[] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE
[] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING
[] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt.: $
Contingency Req'd: $
ATTACHMENTS: August 2003 Monthly Financial Report
SUMMARY~ACKGROUND:
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Was reviewed and approved by the Finance Committee
during their September 30th meeting.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move for the approval of the August 2003 Monthly Financial Report."
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
[] APPROVED
[] TABLED/DEFERREDfNO ACTION
[] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1s* reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/10/2001
Federal Way
4ugust 2005 Mon M Finon¢iol
The Monthly Financial Report is intended to provide an
overview of financial activity that has taken place in the
reporting period. This report focuses mainly on activity
incurred in the following operating funds: General, Street,
Arterial Street, Utility Tax Projects, Solid Waste &
Recycling, Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax, Paths & Trails,
Surface Water Management, Debt Service, and Dumas Bay
Center/Knutzen Family Theatre Operations. The Summary
of Sources and Uses (Attachment A) captures financial
activity through August for the years 1998 through 2003.
35.0
~ 25.0-
· _o 20.0 ·
~.":.~ '10.0. ~
· . '.=' Jr;
· ' [~.' - -4:
YTD Operating Revenues vs Operating Expenditures
Thru August
REVENUE SUMMARY BY MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES
Period Ending August 31, 2003
.......................... (In Thousands~ ..........................
:-:':-:':':':':*:':':':':*:*:-:':-:-:! -:-:*:-:-:':-: :-2~3:Re~,ls~O]B~u~t:. *:,~t~tl~:- :-:-:.Yt~dc;e:-:*:-'.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::: :-:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:::::::::::: ::::::::::::::: :::::~.~.'!¥:::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::~¢¢!:::: :::::::::::::::: :~.~!i:: ::i~fo.~a~:: :::td.~.~.o~.'.~!~)::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::;~4~;,i::: :::~k,;~;6:: ::;~,it::: :::~ii:: ::::5::::: :::::~;::::'
Prope*'tyTaxes $ 4,023 $ 7,777 $ 4,243 $ 4243 0.0~
Sales Tax 7,130 tl,000 7,224 6,950 (273 -3.85'
Hotel/Motel Ledglng Tax 74 t34 78 89 12 14.95{
Criminal Jus6ce Sales Tax 1,057 1,611 1,059 1,042 (17} -1.65{
Inte~jovemmental 2,278 3,346 2,157 1,854 (303}-14.1'~
Real Estate Excise Tax 1,639 1,900 1,222 t ,927 705 57.7!
Sambling Taxes 1,411 1,850 1,225 1287 62 5.15{
Utility Taxes 4,299 7,748 5,226 4,647 (579}-t1.15{
Court Revenue 478 1,019 629 839 210 33.55{
Building Permits/Fees-CD 1,068 1,180 819 909 92 11.2<
Expedited Review Fees-CD 56 131 131 0.05{
ROW Perrnits/Fees-PW 208 369, 253 244 (10) -3.85{
Expedited Review Feas-PW 42 -
Licenses 84 142 80 52 (29) -35.65{
Franchise Fees 473 622 464 501 38 8. t5{
Passport Agency Fees - I 13 13 n/~
Recreation Fees 484 930 470 544 74 15.8~
:)ureas Bay Centre 343 494 316 336 20 625{
~nutzen Family 'n~eatre 52 70 38 80 42 110.95{
Interest Earnings 305 744 485 284 (201)-41.45{
~,dmin/Cash Mgmt Fees310 527 351 351 (0) 0.05{
SWM Fees 1,632 3,433 1,785 1,758 (26) -1.5~
Refuse Collection Fees 120 165 136 136 0 0.05{
Police Services 510 926 639 627 (11) -1.8°,{
MisceilaneousJOther 72 98 i 57 78 21 0.05{
S~bio~p~-.Ct~;~.:-:- :.:.~;~..:.:.~i~o~4, i :*:.:~ ~:~: :':':~9~: :;::¥~.~.'):::::~..~
Other Financing Sources 4,489 16,056 12,492 12,492 - 0.05{
Total'Revenues~&Other.*.... .-....~*...*.. *.-...-.....-.-
$i~ht?:e~:;:':':;¥':':':':*:*:*:. $:-~,b~' -S.;.:~.;~;~(~
General governmental operating revenue collections
August total $29M which is $162K or 0.6% below
budget of $29.11M. Of this amount, $126K is re]
Utility taxes and REET that are reserved for the pa3~
debt services.
Real Estate Excise Tax
To date, REET of $1.9M exceed the ytd budget of $1
$705K or 58%. Compared to 2002, collections are up
or 18%. August's receipt of $262K is $69K ab(
monthly estimate and includes a total of 279 real
transactions, of which 92 were tax exempt and of ret
187, 7 were mobile home sales. The largest transa¢
current month consist of the sale of an office bldg
Campus Corp Park, and Cedar Gardens Apts on S~
Pl.
Sales Tax
*Budget is pm~ected based on pest 5 yea~s history.
Sales tax received through August of $7M is $273K
below the ytd budgeted amount of $7.2M. 2003 ytd
of $7M is also below August 2002 ytd revenue of $;
ort
:hrough
the ytd
ated to
nent of
.2M by
;288K
'e the
estate
~aining
ions in
at East
337th
r 3.8%
:venue
1M by
City of Federal Wa},
$180K or 2.5%. The current month's receipt of $964K is
above the monthly estimate of $961K by $3K or 0.3%.
Sales Tax by SIC Code
Retail sales continue to remain the largest source of sales tax
revenue, accounting for 64.3% of all sales tax collections.
Ytd retail sales tax collection is $49K or 1% lower than the
year 2002. Miscellaneous trade, retail furniture, general
merchandise, and Apparel & Accessories are down while
bldg materials, food stores and retail eating & drinking are
up.
Services industry accounts for 12.9% of the total sales tax
collections through August. On ytd basis, services sales tax
is up $37K or 4.4% from the year 2002. The increase is
mainly due to new installations at one of the major
amusement facilities and increase activities in Auto Repair.
The variance in hotels/motels is also contributing to the
increase in ytd collections.
Construction and contracting activity, which accounts for
10% of sales tax collections, is $50K or 6.7% below year
2002 activity.
Wholesale tax which accounts for about 4.5% of total sales
tax collection, is $47K or 13% below year 2002 activity due
to overall decline in activity.
SALES TAX ACTIVI'P( BY SIC CODE
YTD Thr~h ~t 2003
12,9%
August 2003 Monthly Financial Report
% chg f~m pmv yr -1Z 6% 21. 3% na
Peroent ~ of total 1.0% 1.2% 02%
The City's largest retail center, South 348th, which
generates over 13% of the City's sales tax experienced a
decrease of $8K or 1% when compared to the year 2002.
The increases in building materials and retail eating &
drinking were offset by the decreases in other categories.
SeaTac Mall is showing a decrease of $46K or 7% when
compared to year 2002 activity. On a monthly basis, tax
received in current month is virtually same as August 2002.
The year-to-date tax from the Mall's department stores,
which generate more than one-half of the Mall's sales tax,
has decreased $35K or 9% compared to 2002.
Major Auto Sales through August have collected $284K,
which is $9K or 3% below the same period in 2002. The
variance was caused by the late filing on one of car dealers.
S 312t~ to S316t~ is up $13K or 4% from the prior year. The
increase is attributable to a $17K increase by the center's
biggest box retailer that is offset by $4K net decrease from
the other retailers in the center.
Pavilion Center is down $39K, or 13.5% due to the
downward trend in the retail industry. The center is
experiencing across the board decline in activities and is
mainly attributed to the center's biggest contributor.
Hotels & Motels sales tax collected through August total
$84K, which is $15K or 21% above the same period in 2002.
The increase is mainly attributed to timing differences in
returns filed by one major hotel, increasing activities at
another hotel, and a new hotel opened August 2002.
Sales Tax Activity by Area
Ci~ of Federal WaV
Sales Tax By Area
~hru August 2003
S 312th to $ 316th Pavilion Center
5.2% 3.6%
Major' Auto
4.1%
SeaTac Mall
$.5%
S 348~ Re~l Block
13.3%
Hotels 8, Motets
1.2%
64.2%
Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax
Hotel/Motel lodging tax total collection through August of
$89K is $12K or 15% above the year-to-date budget of
$78K. The increase is mainly attributable to timing
differences in returns filed by one major hotel, increasing
activities at another hotel, and a new hotel opened August
2002.
Jan 7,374 7,952 8,122 170 2.1%
Feb 8,359 8,105 12,316 4,211 52.0%
Mar 6,072 9,017 12,153 3,136 34.8%
Apr 7.769 9,031 11,436 2,405 26.6%
May 8,491 11,087 11,449 362 3.3%
Jun 8,938 9,282 9,109 (1731 -1.9%
Jul 13,751 11,276 12,110 834 7.4%
Aug 12,915 11,988 12,608 620 5.2%
Sep 13,802 15,530
Oct 13,4791 14,433
Nov 13,3671 12,516
Dec 14,982 I 13,783
Ta~e rejects C~h baSis accounting
August 2003 MonthlF Financial Re oort
Jan $210,579 156,005 $159,323 $ 3,318 2.1%
Feb 212,309 151,800 152,943 1,14;~ 0.8%
Mar 175,625 144,863 160,415 15,55:~ 10.7%
Apr 189,533 177,474 176,029 (1,449) -0.8%
May 167,112 157,198 184,574 27,37§ 17.4%
Jun 161,592 156,862 160,030 3,168 2.0%
Jul 142,814 150,802 151,214 !121 0.3%
Aug 150,984 129,820 142,354 12, 9.7%
Sep 139,851 140,427
Oct 134,904 164,430 -
Nov 119,265 160,735 -
Dec 121,874 159,584
Utility Tax
The utility tax rate increased from 5% to 6% e ctive
February 1, 2003. The additional 1% was adored by
Council to fund new service level adjustments~nd is
budgeted to yield an additional $1.25M. However,
time we do not anticipate meeting budget projections
the leveling off of utility tax, 2002's actual falling s
meeting year-end projection, and the 1% increase not
effect until February lst.
Council also approved an ordinance earlier this year that
would provide utility tax relief for low income senior ~. The
ordinance would relieve the full 6% of the utility tax to
eligible citizens through a City administered "~ebate'
program. The first requests for reimbursement of pai~12003
(February through December) utility taxes will be due no
later than April 30, 2004. I
at this
due to
~ort of
taking
Gambling Tax
Gambling tax collection of $1.29M is $62K or 5.1% above
the year-to-date budget of $1.22M. In comparison to 2002
year-to-date collections, 2003's tax collection is lower by
$124K or 8.8%. August's collection of $142K is $13K or
9.7% above the mommy budget estimate of $130K. YTD
collections from the top five largest establishments (in terms
of tax revenue) have decreased $85K or 6.6% from the same
period of 2002. These 5 establishments are responsible for
93% of the year-to-date tax collections.
City of Federal Way August 2003 Monthly Financial Report
Utility tax received through August total $4.65M, which is
$579K or 11% below the ytd budget total of $5.23M. The
ytd thru August 2003 utility tax receipt is above the same
period in 2002 by $348K or 8%.
The year-to-date electricity tax includes a one-time back
payment of $52K from Puget Sound Energy for the audit
periods 1999 through September 2002. In June 2003, we
also received a payment of $4K from Verizon Wireless for
the periods 1999 thru April 2003 based on audit results by
Microflex consulting fn'm. In addition to $4K already
receipted for the same audit periods, we are anticipating
assessments of $136K on Comcast and $19K on Sprint PCS.
Puget Sound Energy reported a sharp decrease in gas
revenues due to rate decrease that took effect in September,
2002. The rate hike in April 2003 had not helped much on
lost revenues over the winter peak season. Gas taxes are
below the ytd budget of $881K by $276K or 31%.
Electricity is below the ytd budget of $1.8M by $134K or
8%. Cable taxes are below the ytd budget of $499K by $18K
or 4%. Phone taxes are below the ytd budget of $768K by
$85K or 11%. Cellular phone taxes are below the ytd budget
of $900K by $88K or 10%.
Compared to ytd 2002, Electricity is up $247K or 18%, Gas
is down $156K or 21%, Cable is up $74K or 18%, Phone is
up $27K or 4%, and Cellular phone is up $86K or 12%.
As of December 5th, 2002 the effective date of 1-776, local
license fees collected in King and Pierce Counties are being
held in an account at the State Treasurer's Office until it is
determined whether the initiative is constitutional.
According to the state, through August the City's share is
$502K and it is now on Attorney General's hands for final
review before the actual distribution to local governments.
Building Permits and Plan Check Fees
Ytd building permit revenues total $909K, which is above
the ytd budget by $91K or 11.1%. This does not include ytd
pass through revenues of $131K. Revenues collected for
expedited review is currently not budgeted nor are the
offsetting expenditures. Building permits, which includes
mechanical, plumbing and clear/grade permits total $437K
and is above the ytd budget by $33K or 8%. Electrical
permits of $85K are above the ytd budget of $72K by
$12.7K or 18%. Plan check fees of $308K are $31K or 11%
above the ytd budget estimate of $277K.
Utility Tax Revenue
YTD Thru August 2003
Pagers 2.1%
0.1%
Cellular Eleca'ic
17.5%
Phone
14.7%
Cable Gas
13.0%
10.4% Garbage
6.7%
State Shared Revenue
Ytd distribution of $2.9M is below the ytd budget of $3.2M
by $320K or 10%. The unfavorable variance is due mainly
to vehicle licensing fees offset by major increases in
criminal justice high crime and liquor profits tax.
** Expenditures include Community Development Admin, Planning, and Building.
The following table presents a synopsis of. ytd building
permit activity as of August 31st for new construction
between 2001 and 2003.
4
Cit~ o[ Federal WaF
August 2003 Monthly Financial RePort
:Building DWbion - Permit Activity
YTD Through Au~mt, 2003
2001 2001 2002 2002 2003 20~3
New Resldential (Platted) 24 $ 3,342,470 107 $ 23,263~349105 $ 24,167,393
New Commercial 15 30,535,448 19 35,658,686 10 1,050,972
New Mul ti. Family lJnits 4 1,051,687 I 0 I 1,042,389
New Public 0 0 0 0 0
SubtotaI-NewC~o~t~uctioo 43 $ 34,929,605 127 $ 58,922,035 116 $ 26,2.60,754
Manufa~:tured Homes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Residential Altcra6ons 101 3,003,30010g 2,321,74095 2,808,247
Commemial Altecatioos 158 13,174,497 309 17,968,713 164 12,533,964
Plumbing Only 56 0 60 0 74 0
Mechanical Only 226 1,137,610201 888,490 218 972,276
Misc. Bu/Idin[~ Permits0 0 0 0 0 0
· :Subtolal-Alte~tiom 541 $ 17,315,407678 $ 21,178,943551 $ 16,314,487
Electxical Permits 710 0 838 0 718
Total Bulldinl[Permits1294 $ 52,245,012 1643 $ 80,100,978 1385 $ 42,575,241
Non-Building Permits:
Si~n Permits 181 342,818167 361,273158 313,724
To~ls 181 $ 342,818 167 $ 361,273 158 $ 313,724
Total Commercial Valuation 173 $ 43,709,945 328 $ 53,627,399 174 $ 13,584,936
Commercial al u % of Tomi 13% 84% 20% 67% 13% 32%
* In~lud~ all r~w, alternation
ROW Permits and Fees
Overall Public Works permits and fees collected through
August total $244K, which is $10K or 4% below the ytd
budget of $253K. Right-of-way permits collected total $60K
which is $72K or 55% below the ytd budget of $132K. Plan
review fees collected total $69K which is $21K or 23%
below the ytd budget of $90K. Public works inspection fees
of$115K is $83K or 259% above the ytd budget of $32K.
Month Ave ! 24,957; 30,788 I 30,450 '.
Court Revenue
Court revenue is at the ytd budget total of $564K from fines
& forfeitures. Total court revenue collected through August
amounts to $839K which is $210K or 33% above last year's
collections of $518K by $321K or 62%.
Probation services revenue total $275K and is $211K or
329% above the ytd budget. Ytd probation expenditures total
$228K resulting in net probation revenue of $47K.
Probations contract was recemly revised and is expected to
have an unfavorable impact to probation revenues.
Revenue $ 64,167 $ 275,013 $ 210,847
Expenses 64,167 227,649 (163,482)
January $48,982 63,816 $55,490 ($8,32~)[ -13.0%
Februa~ 57,256 68,634 78,815 10,181 [ 14.8%:
Mamh 69,769 80,526 82,635 2,10~ 2.6~
Apfll 72.609 74,543 73,723 (814) -1.1 ~{
May 46,487 68,011 67,131 (881[)I -1.3~1
June 49,004 66,920 77,763 10,84~ ] 16.2~
~ugust 68,659 73,086 57,817 (169) -20.9~{
September 55.775 66,410
October 79,013 69,583
November 67,344 62,970
December 66,133 50,036
Probation Services 38,724 I 64,167 275,013 210,847l ] 328.6%
· Included in ClxJft Reveftue me Pmba6o~ Se~vi(:~s and ~mittances ff~m District Coufl fo~"Shale I Court.
Costs', 'Coort Recoil/Services" aed Other' Court-related miscellaneous ~eve~ue. Traffic ~chool is now
Traffic and non-parking fmes total $346K and is $9K or 3%
above the ytd budget. Compared to ytd 2002, collect.ons
are above by $76K or 28%.
Parking infractions total $41K and is $9K or 29% abt,ve
the ytd budget. Compared to ytd 2002, collections are
above by $20K or 100%.
DUI and other misdemeanors total $94K and is $4K o r 5%
above the ytd budget. Compared 'to ytd 2002, collect: ons
are below by $9K or 9%.
Criminal costs total $43K and is $11K or 20% below ~he ytd
budget. Compared to ytd 2002, collections are below by
$7K or 20%.
Parking Infractions $20,555 51,O07 3',678 I 41,017 I 91339 I
DUI & Other MIsd $103,856 145,047 90,083 [ 94,442 I 41359 I 4'80A
Criminal Traffic Mlsd$40,570 63,489 39,4301 3,,648 [ t762)1
Criminal Costs* $35,909 87,432 54,301 I 43,256 1 (11t045)1 -20.3%
Shared Court Costs $3,352 11,532 7,162 I 3,068 I (4~004)1 -57.2%
Traff ScM Adm Fee 1,457 0 OI OI OI 0.0%
Cit~ of Federal Wa}, August 2003 Monthl}, Financial Report
General governmental expenditures through August total
$26.42M or 47% of the annual operating budget of $55.9M.
Operating expenditures are below the ytd budget of $28.1M
by $1659K or 6%.
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT
Period Ending August 31, 2003
In Thousands)
:.:.:-:.:-:.:.:.:-:.:':.:.:.:.:':-:.:.:-I-:-:':-:.:-:-: z00~e0~ :~*~,,:..:.:.:..V.a~,~,:.:.:.:
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1 i:i~:i: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::~.~!:: ::'.~.h.~.~: :::'.~.b~:: ::;~b~.~.t:: :::::::::::::::::::::::
.~ityCouncil S 203 S 260 S 207 $ 220 S (13) -6.4%
.~ity Manager 478 691 467 430 37 7.9%
~lunicipal Court-Operations 792 1.211 797 922 (124) -15.6%
danagernent Services 1,112 2,005 1,295 1,130 165 12.7%
~ivilK;dminal Legal Services ! 775 1,449 962 768 194 20.2%
.~omm. Development Svcs 1,864 3,662 2,373 2,182 192 8.1%
~olice Services 9,116 15,572 10,138 9,904 234 2.3%
Jail Se~ices 648 I 1,342 805 706 99 12.3%
3arks and Recreatio~ 2,062 4,042 2,685: 2,320 365 13.6%
=ublic Works 2,269 4,090 2,553 i 2,193 360 14.1%
;ity OveHay Program 1,292 2,379 1.430 1,430 0.0%
~olid Waste 194 421 268 186 82 30.5%
qotel/Motel Lodging Tax 73 312 54 54 0.0%
Surface Water Management 1,138 2,198 1,406 1,290 116 8.3°~
Debt Se~,qce 2,230 15.630 2.342 2,342 0.0~
Dumas Bay Centre 336 494 328 332 (3) -1.0~
K.'-utzo~.Fa.'ni!~T~,atre 100 !77 ~ 11.~ IL9_)' -~93~,
~ublftlal, O1)orE~ .. 24..6.80.~5.S:9.II$~. 2e..~208: 26.525 1.6~13 ·
"lF'l'i,lf~lllfl,~ ti%eli' 8 l;~i 7,) I~1 '5816 1!; 9:8 · · n
l'~'xpe~tdil.res & - , .
~. ~.fi~.'.u.~::;:::;:;:;:;:::::::::::[:~ :~,i!~:~.:~:/~;~:t:¥:~!;~:t:.lt:~:J:~:-~;~:t:::::::~.~i~
City Council
City Council expenditures total $220K, which is above the
ytd budget total of $207K by $13K or 6%. The unfavorable
variance is due mainly to the additional 10K support to
Airport Communities Coalition approved by Council, but
not yet budgeted by ordinance.
City Manager
Activity through August total $430K, which is below the ytd
budget total of $467K by $37K or 8%. Savings are due to
one-time funded new programs.
Municipal Court
Municipal Court expenditures total $922K, which is above
the ytd budget total of $797K by $124K or 16%. The
variance is due to a higher than budgeted BI contract
expenses. However, BI contract revenue more than offsets
the expenditure increase.
Civil/Criminal Legal Services
Law expenditures through August total $768K, which is
below the ytd budget total of $962K by $194K or 20%.
Savings can be found in Civil Legal Services salaries and
benefits, ongoing outside legal counsel and public defender,
and one-time funded programs.
Management Services
Management Services expenditures through August total
$1130K, which is below the ytd budget total of $1295K by
$165K or 13%. Savings are due to one-time funded
programs
Community Development
Community Development expenditures through August total
$2.18M, which is below the ytd budget total of $2.37M by
$192K or 8%. Savings are due to one-time funded programs.
Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax
Ytd expenditures are comprised of tourism enhancement
grants ($25K), General Fund admin fees ($9K), events
planning-Korean Cultural & Sports Festival and Women's
Marathon/Sporting Event ($15K), visitor information
($2.3K), traffic investigation ($2K), postcards and other
($1K). Overall revenues total $92K and are made up of
hotel/motel tax ($89K), interest earnings ($2K), and postcard
sales ($47).
Public Works
Public Works Operations: Public Works Operating
expenditures are below August's ytd budget of $2.55M by
$360K or 14%. Savings can be found in the timing of some
contract payments and one-time funded new programs.
Solid Waste and Recycling Operations: Expenditures are
below ytd budget of $268K by $82K or 31%. Savings are
due to the timing of grant payments.
Surface Water Management Operations: Expenditures are
below ytd budget of $1406K by $116K or 8%. Savings can
be found in one-time funded new programs and salaries and
benefits due to the late hiring of the new SWM Inspector.
Public Safety Operations
Police Services have expended $9.9M through August,
which is below the ytd estimated budget of $10.14M by
$234K or 2%. As shown in the table below, salaries and
benefits are below the budget estimate but are offset by
overages in overtime and termination pay.
: · .: "' ~,oo~ym'ni6,'~a~usi":, :'. ·
. .. .. . . : ~ · ..-.: · · ..:~:~;
$ Vadance % Vafia~
~n~l Fa~e Fa~e
B~g~ ~ ~ ~ A~I (~a~e) (U~a~e)
~lad~ 8,~3,~7 5.~,~1 5,5~,~1 ~1,571 5.8~
P3 278,318 278,318 J~,~l 81,9~ ~.5%
r~p H~p ~,216 ~.1~ ~,1~ 1~.0%
~ 2~,~ 170,~ ~,7~ (210.748} -124.0~
r~t~ ~y 37,~9 (37,~9)
~ts 2,211,~ 1,474,~7 1,313,287 161,0~ 10.~
T~ ~ ~ :" ~' ;'~'~: ::' '~;?'*~" : ' '~; .... " ' ? ' ' · ".".4
~ · '..~,~ z;~,~ z,~,4~s '~,~ .~
Year-to-date Police overtime is 42% or approximately
$233K below the same period last year. There is a $19K
increase in overtime for contracted services and the
homeland security programs. When the increase from the
billable overtime is included, the total overtime is decreased
by 36% or around $214K, during the first eight months of
the year.
Cit}, of Federal
PS Overtime By Type
2002 2003 $ %
Training 57,989 19,744 (38,245) -66%
Court 27,180 35,723 8,544 31%
Field Operation 418,712 231,504 (187,209) -45%
SOAP 7,466 2,271 (5,195) -70%
Olher 48,076 37,544 (10,532) -22%
City Portion 559,424 326,787 (232,637) -42%
Conlract or Grant $ 35,132 $48,903 $ 13,771 39%
Homeland Sec. 5,059 5,059 NA
Billal~e 35,132 53,962 18,830 54%
Grand Total $ 594,555 $380,748 $(213,8071 -36%
As shown by the month-to-month overtime comparison
graph, the decrease started in February and has stayed about
half of last year's spending from March through June of this
year. In July and August overtime reflected similar trends to
2002, however at lower levels of expenditures. If the
present trend continues, we should end the year with around
$640,000 of total overtime costs for a reduction of 35% from
the 2002 expenditures of $982,445.
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$20,000
Police Overtime Expense
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Month
The 2003 budget considers the elimination of the $25 court
administration fee, which was redirected to a traffic school
fee, and an additional $25 for other indirect costs. The
budget also establishes a direct expenditure budget of $60K
to cover direct ongoing traffic school costs such as overtime
and supplies, etc. The following is an analysis on traffic
school activity. Thru August, revenues total $154K while
expenditures total $38K, resulting in net revenues of $116K.
Revenue $ 49,512 $ 153,709 $ 104,197 210.4%
Expenditures:
Overtime
Supplies
Travel/Training
Other Charges
Capital
total Expend
24,614
12,599
4,790
681
3,958
46,642
33,576
3,932
295
195
37,998
(8,962)
8,667
4,495
486
3,958
8,644
-36.4%
68.8%
93.8%
71.4%
100.0%
18.5%
Rev Over / (Under) Exp $ 2,870 $ 115,711 $ 95,553 3329.4%
August 2003 Monthly Financial Re ~ort
Jail Services
The table below compares activity through July as August
invoices have not been received. Jail Services is be low the
ytd budget of $805K by $99K or 12%. The annual b~ ~dget of
$1.34M may be slightly high when compared to 2002's
annual total of $1.07M.
..... · . ~O/l, ..........
January $ 108,739 $ 104,341 I $ 92,944 $11,3[ 109~
February 112,436 108,264I 86,453I 21,81 120.1%
March [ 99,516I 115,827I 95,849I 19,97 17.2%
April I 64'2591 112,174I 104,6601 7,51 I 6.7%
May I 75'9071 121,090I 110,778I 10,31 I 8'5°/"
June I 7<0451 113,642I 10&047[ 5,5~. [ 4.9%
July ] 92,830I 129,861 [ 107,300t 22,5~ 117.4°/"
August 91,360 118,729 - -
September [ 89,959I 111,3901 -I I '
October I 79'588 I 1°4'878 I 'l I '
November [ 84,463I 102,292I 'l I '
Parks and Recreation
Parks Operations expenditures through August total
which is $365K or 14% below the ytd budget of $
Dumas Bay Center and Knutzen Family T!
expenditures exceed the ytd budget estimate, but an
by higher than anticipated revenues.
B20K,
2.68M.
teatre's
offset
Kenneth Jones Memorial Pool
Ytd pool expenditures total $137K and includes ~ $35K
payment for the pool's continued operations undq: King
County. This amount is net of the $76K one-time p~yment
received from King County to be used for the operation and
maintenance of the pool.
Operating Revenue I 314,000 I * 68,041
Salaries & Benefits I I 62,296
Suppr, es I I
King C~s-lntedocal Agreement I I 34,922
Travel & Training I I 964
Other Serw~es & Charges I I 1 ,e29
Intergovernmental I I 421
Capital Improvements/Maintenance[ I 16,423
Inlorfund Char(jes [ [10.370
:tivity
June.
ting in
The following table summarizes the total pool's ~
under King County's continued operations through
Revenues total $81K and expenses total $202K, resul
a subsidy of $121K.
.CRv of Federal Wav
,ourse Revenue 35,762
Rental Revenue 20,158
Point of Sale (Drop-In) 24,841
Salaries & Benefits 142,902
Supplies 5,644
Utilities 46,317
Other Svcs & Charges 7,336
Celebration Park:
The following table is a breakdown of Celebration Park
maintenance and operations. Ytd revenue of $224K consists
of a $221K subsidy from the Utility Tax Fund, and $4K in
concession fees. A portion of the revenues from ball field
and field light rentals are accounted for in. youth and adult
athletic programs. M&O expenditures total SXl~K. 2~{e~c
Operating Revenue - Concession Fees 28,000 $ 4,987
Tournament Revenue * 44,490 44,490
Transfer-In from Utility Tax 220,803 220,803
' ~ '
Salaries & Benefits 182,116 144,991
Supplies '~- 31,850 18,182
Professional Services 4,000 3,328
Leases/Rentals 6,000 4,450
Electricity 40,000 20,808
Water & Sewer 32.000 i 4,974
Repairs & Maintenance 9,000 3,487
Interfund Charges 8,940 5,960
* The revenue shown is foe the full year based on booking records form youth
and adult softball and soccer tournaments, filed rentals, gate fees, and light
charges. Both budget and actual am accounted in rec. division and are not
separated ouL The budget amount is shown only fo~ illuslrative purpose.
August 2003 Monthly Financial Report
Recreation and Cultural Services:
Direct program expenditures total $697K or 51.9% of the
total annual budget of $1.34M not including indirect costs.
Including indirect administration costs, recreation
expenditures total $936K and are 54.7% of the total annual
budget of $1.71M. Recreation fees total $523K and are
57.9% of the total annual budget of $902.5K. Recreation
fees have recovered 75.1% of direct program costs and is
7.8% above the annual budgeted recovery ratio of 67.3%.
Considering indirect administration costs, the recovery ratio
is reduced to 55.9% or 3.1% above the annual budgeted
recovery ratio of 52.8%.
Dumas Bay Centre:
Operating expenditures through August total $332K, which
is $3K or 1% above the ytd budget of $328.4K. Dumas Bay
Centre has recovered 101.3% of its operating expenses.
Dumas Bay Centre operating revenues of $336K are also up
by $20K or 6% compared to the ytd budget of $316K.
Knutzen Family Theatre:
Operating expenditures through August total $118K, which
is $19K or 19% above the ytd budget of $99K.
Operating revenues of $80K is also up $42K or 111%
compared to the ytd budget of$38K. Knutzen Theatre has
recovered 68.1% of its operating expenses.
RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS
.Aquatic~ 2,000 1,35~1 67.5% 20,621 21,364 10316% 9.7% 6.3°4
Arts & Special Events 87,600 52,818 60.3% 105,950 79,176 74.7% 82.7% 66.704
Youth Athletics 58,450 48,970 83.8% 86,801 36,251 41.8% 67.3% 135.104
Adult Athletics 198,000 156,640 79.1% 112,981 96,154 85.1% 175.3% 162.9°4
~nmunity Recreation 165,500 129,821 78.4% 136,627 142,925 104.6% 121.1% 90.804
Community Center 26,500' 15,421 58.2% 87,555 45,437 51.9% 30.3% 33.9°4
Recreation Inc 17,700 27,083 153.0% 52,076 42,625 81.9% 34.0% 63.504
Youth Commission 500 64 12.8% 1,800 1,060 58.9% 273% 6.004
Red, White & Blue . 24,700 22,416 90.8% 41,200 50,151 121.7% 60.0% n/~
Senior Se~ices 7,500 17,584 234.5% 82,30! 44,534 54.1°/ 9.1% 39.~eA
~~ ~ ~ Bl~El~lffi ~ [i~l~ ~ 111111~50'691 16.1% 614,000 136.8361 22.3% 51.1% 37.0~
Administration 0.0% 366,977 239,035 65.1% n/a
' DUMAS BAY CENTRE I
Knutzen Family Theatre I 74,476 [ 80,478 [ 10&1%] 177,050 I 118,156 I 66'7%1 42'1%1 68.1%J
Arts Commission ' - - n/ai 85 745 21,299 ' 24.8% n/a n/aI
Revenues do not include grants o~ operating transfers. Expenditures do not include residual equity transfers ~ othe~ i~te~und contrit)ut~ons.
CitF of Federal Way August 2003 MonthlF Financial R orr
Special Revenue:
Artedal Street 695,572 1,555,732 1,429,827 125,905 821,477
Utility Tax (1) 7,872,948 4,649,928 12,522,876 (7,872,948) ~-~
Solid Waste & Recycling 162,896 205,878 186,148 19,730 182,62(
Special Study (Gev. TV) 106,511 1,014 5,576 (4,562) 101,94c~
Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax 182,119 91,557 54,078 37,480 219,5~
2% for the Arts 28,114 20,089 (20,089) 8,02.~
CDBG (2) 5,943 86,653 77,355 9,298 15,241
Paths & Trails 51,592 6,203 6,203 57,794
Capital Project:
Public Safety Facility 7.440.966 160.182 1.912.334 2.072.516 9.513.483
Downtown Revitalization 1,031,140 - 1,031,140 (1,031,140) C
Unallocated 1997 Bond Proceeds 20,365 20,365 (20,365)
Community/Senior Center/Pool 785, 519 68,502 717,017 717,01
Celebration Pa rk 107,908 5,473 5,473 113,381
Park Improvements 574.042 1,051,597 476,507 575,089 1,149.13~
Surf,a~e Water Management 6,634,716 731,611 672,180 59,431 6,694,147
TranSportation 8,092,939 8,808,9421 6,732,215 2,076,727 10,169,66(
Enterprise Funds:
Surface Water Management 487,502 1,762,000: 2,079,330 (317,330) 170,17~
Dumas Bay Cenffe Operations ,335,479 331,667 3,812 3,81
Dumas Bay Centre Capital 162,098 305,584 157,296 148,288 310,38(
Knutzen Family Theatre Capital 99,660 1,399: 1,399 101,05c.
Knutzen Family Theatre Operations 159,245 118,156 41,089 41,08c.
Infernal Service Funds: (3)
Risk Management 4,057,551 519,801 445,970 73,831 4,131,38~
information Systems 1,962,972 1,085,436 1,050,021 35,415 1,998,38~
Mail & Duplication 140,528 146,924 95,717 51,207 191,7~
Fleet & Equipment 2,119.918 895,790 922,027 (26,237) 2,093,681
Buildinqs & Fumi,,flfin(is &39 634 , 283 ,079 2n0 0.30 82 2.t9 , 891 ,P,8,'.
S, sbto, tal'l, nt~rn, al SerVice F, md$ , 9.090.603. 2,93f.0.29 ;, 2.714,564 216,466',,, , , 9,307,068
rotal,~ilFunds ' $ 57,993,830 · $ 56,769/579 -'$ 56,187,283 '. $ 4,406,964 $ 62,400,794
(1) Utility Tax and Debt Service fund balance is reserved for the payment of debt service.
(2) CDBG deficit fund balance due to timing of grant reimbursements.
(3) Intemal Service fund balance is comprised of accumulated replacement reserves for the purpos~ e of fixed asset replacement
with the exception of Risk Management, which is comprised of accumulated reserves for self-insurance and strategic reserve.
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
SUMMARY OF SOURCES AND USES
OPERATING FUNDS
Through August 2003
1998 - 2003
: : ~.0.~)3 R~yls~d..B~f~get .... Actuals Vadance - --
Through Through Favorable (U.n favorable)
~ourcesAJses 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Annual August Auc~ust Dollars ($) . Percent (%)
IBeginningFund Balance $ 13,915,993 $ 17,580,138 $18,050,656 $20,817,900 $22,799,494 $ 24,252,617 $ 24,620,497 $ 24,598,825 $ (21.672) -0.1%
::)peratlng Revenues
~roperty Taxes 3,381,265 3,557,241 ! 3,672,303 i 3,810,030 4,023,186 7,777,226 4,242,914 4,242,914 - ! 0.0%
;ales Tax 5,630,971 6,214,084 ! 6,874,166 I 6,810,474 7,130,469 10,999,574 7,223,831 6,950,349 (273,482) -3.8%
-Iotel/Motel Lodging Tax 15,631 65,605i 88,854 73,670 134,000 77,738 89,303 11,565 14.9°.4
`3riminal Justice Sales Tax 878,427 959,674 1,065,926 i 1,114,547 1,057,326 1,611,369 1,058,678 1,042,102 (16,576) -1.6%
Intergovernmental 3,316,984 3,374,296 3,037,741 2.617,022 2,277,807 3,345,546 2,157,236 1,854,069 i (303,167) -14.t%
Real Estate Excise Tax 1,612,556 1,445,579 1,431,606 1,163,667 1,638,946 1,900,000 1,221,744 1,926,803 705,059 57.7%
3ambling Taxes 212,341 966,742 1,006,156 1,488,019 1,410,548 t,850,000 1,224,824 1,286,883 62,059 5.1o.4
Jtility Taxes 3,178,957 3,532,394 3,741,479 4,214,773 4,299,462 7,747,611 5,226,006 4,647,186 (578,820) -11.1%
3ourt Revenue 543,566 562,46t 621,004 588,297 477,956 1,018,813 628,596 838,999 i 210,403 33.5%
3uiiding Permits/Fees-CD 635,271 983,353 685,156 716,298 1,068,264 1,179,816 818,603 909,172 i 90,569 11.1%
-:.xpedited Review Fees-CD 8,211 62,799 81,225 78,508 55,860 130,803 130,803 I 0.0%
:~OW Permits/Fees-PW 157,542 155,675 191,837 259,806 208,144 369,455 253,264 243,596 i (9,668) -3.8%
=-xpedited ReviewFees-PW 8,003 40,345 32,058 15,962 41,771 26,618 26,618 I 0.0%
Licenses 35,526 107,823 64,743 58,922 83,810 i 142,100 80,147 51,591 I (28,555) -35.6%
=ranchise Fees 344,922 353,299 366,550 429,580 472,568 621,964 463,707 501,495 I 37,786 8.1%
:~assport Agency Fees ' I 12,600 i 12,600 n/a
Recreation Fees 338,164 462,468 415,721 457,195 484,055 930,450 469,669 543,799 74,130 15.8%
:)umas Bay Centre 209,486 312,941 305,931 394,140 343,233 493,750 316,230 335,919 , 19,689 6.2%
(nutzen Fatuity Theatre 24,597 39,321 47,320 52,085 69,976 38,166 80,478 ! 42,312 110.9%
'nterest Earnings 510,968 718,407 745,940 650,828 304,854 743,621 485,183 284,183 ! (201,000) -41.4o.4
~.dmin/Cash Mgmt Fees 110,660 112,320 99,335 317,536 310,353 526,592 351,061 351,061 I (0) 0.0%
SWM Fees 1,625,811 1,710,775 1,624,892 1,583,371 1,632,138 3,432,770 1,784,791 1,758,414 (26,376) -I.5%
~efuse Collection Fees 98,103 99,048 83,681 100,049 120,225 165,240 136,215 136,245 30 0.0%
:~olice Services 96,519 223,298 525,356 534, t 12 510,258 926,082 638,791 627,326 (11,465) -1.8%
Miscellaneous/Other 1,052,666 100 297 44,280 44,685 71,879 I 98,292 57,379 , 78,224 20.845 36.3%
total Operating Revenues ; 23,986,918 i 2,6,095,546 ; 26,822,,012 ' 27,583,995 28,148,867 ; 46,084,247 : 29,112,193 . 28,980,132 (162,061~ -0.6%
::)peraflng Expenditures
,3ky Council 158,220 151,163 156,409 164,800 203,286 260,050 207,273 220,465 (13,192) -6.4%
`3ky Manager 381,879 377,768 284,307 436,733 477,657 691,203 467,026 430,029 36,997 7.9%
Municipal Court-Operations 257,298 462,596 718,988 791,662 1,210,569 797,197 921,687 (124,490) -15.6%
Vlanagement Services 1,026,335 1,113,396 1,006,401 1,096,967 1,111,631 2,005,360 1,294,546 1,129,970 164,576 12.7%
`3ivit/Criminal Legal Services 1,047,339 823,405 811,632 ~ 764,384 775,259 1,448,586 961,809 767,624 194,184 20.2%
,3omm. Development Svcs 1,725,566 1,942,334 1,918,060 , 1,930,841 1,863,504 3.662,187 2,373,019 2,181,511 191,508 8.1%
=olice Services 7,245,619 7,837,644 8,314,556 8,764,346 9,115,696 15,572,132 10,137,890 9,903,984 233,906 2.3%
Jail Services 544,061 915,922 937,984 824,672 647,733 1,342,000 805,199 706,032 99,167 12.3%
:~arks and Recreation 1,863,748 2,011,509 2,037,708 I 2,063,559 2,061,665 4,041,628 2,684,885 2,319,756 365,129 I 13.6%
3ublic Works 2,080,328 1,959,645 1,930,279 2,025,906 2,268,803 4,090,497 2,552,797 2,192,916 359.881 ~ 14.15
.3ky Overlay Program 450,794 1,030,017 1,248,918 258,610 1,291,751 2,379,347 1,429,827 1,429,827 - ~ 0.0%
Solid Waste 174,703 151,404 188,078 221,394 193,834 420,855 267,907 186,148 81,758 . 30.5%
-Iotel/Motel Lodging Tax - I 40.424 11,303 72,606 311,797 54,078 54,078 0.0°.4
ISurface Water Management 884,691 1,030.503 1,073,100 1,048,385 1,138,181 2,198,152 1,405,602 1,289,564 116,03~ 8.3%
IDebt Service 1,040,824 2,267,244 2,253,288 2,265,545 2,230,177 15,630,394 2,341,877 2,341,877-- 0.00.4
3ureas Bay Centre 258,711 315,482 321,412 388,994 336,235 493,786 328,432 331,667 (3,235) -1.0%
Knutzen Family Theatre 69, 298 117,030 103,887 100,156 177,050 99,059 118,156 ( 19,097 - 19.3%
Tota Operating Expenditures 18,882,81; 22,254,032 23,102,182 23,089,314 24,679,836 55,935,594 28,208,421 26,525,290 1',683,131 6.0%
:Operating Revenues overl(under)
Operating Expenditures 5,104,101 3,841,615 3,719,830 4,494,681 3,469,032 (9.851,348) 903,771 2,424,841 1,621,070 168.3%
Other Financing Sources 2,347,802 2,332,378 2,706,153 4,953,822 4,488,727 16,055,663 12,492,294 12,492,294 0.0%
Other Financing Uses 5,232,423 4,322,158 4,276,722 9,016,865 8,125,628 20,860,788 15,818,454 15,818,454 0.0~
'~l~ding Fund Balance
Solid Waste 206,232 273,047 230,142 247,647 267,379 71,971 182,626 n/a { n/a
Arterial Street 1,640,449 1,411,641 1,t10,886 1,682,419 1,259,494 0 821,477 n/a rt/a
Utility Tax 1,748,541 3,435,324 4,896,519 3,845,764 5,646,879 31 - I 0 n/a n/a
Snow & Ice Removal 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 100,000 n/a n/a
Surface Water Management 1,849,241 793,111 1,520,426 (72,012) (176,134) 992,700 170,172 n/a n/a
Path & Trails 8,422 17,648 28,049 38,543 46,618 60,892 57,794 n/a n/a
Strategic Reserve 2,029,993 2,005,408 2,059,491 2,160,794 n/a n/a
Debt Service 4,627,850 4,537,723 3,684,190 7,716,235 6,607,734 3,872,572 ' 14,295,680 n/a n/a
Dumas Bay Centre Operations ( 14,164) 18,875 1,112 9,012 403 ( 19,909) I 3,812 n/a n/a
Knutzen Family Theatre 30,256 72,685 52,315 49,956 62,951 ' 41,089 n/a n/a
Police 390,409 439,699 317,066 605,119 564,785 428,280 - ' 500,679 n/a n/a
P3 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 n/a n/a
Interfund Loans 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 30,500 n/a n/a
9/24/20033:11 PM 03 MFR TABLESSUMMARY ~0
CITY OF
Federal Way
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
From:
Via:
Subject:
September 17, 2003
Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee
Tho Kraus, Finance Manager
David Moseley, City Manager
Vouchers
Action Requested:
Accept the vouchers and forward to the Next Council meeting for approval.
committee Member Il
k:\fin~acctspay~checkrun~nfr cover.doc
MEETING DATE: September 23, 2003 ITEM#
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: VOUCHERS
CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT:
[] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE
[] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING
[] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$2,448,338.21
$2,448,338.21
$
ATTACHMENTS: VOUCHER LIST
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND:
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the City of
Fed~ to authenticate and certify said claims.
Ma~l'~fi~ Services ~
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Approve attached vouchers pursuant to RCW 42.24
PROPOSED MOTION: I move approval of Vouchers.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
[] APPROVED
[] OECD
[] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
[] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
REVISED - 05/10/2001
COUNCIL BILL #
1sT reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
apChkLst
08~26~2003 1:45:09PM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: I
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor
Invoice
174627 08/25/2003 002024
Voucher: 174627
174628 08/25/2003 000302
Voucher: 174628
174629 08/25/2003 005571
Voucher: 174629
174630 08/25/2003 003649
Voucher: 174630
174631 08/25/2003 003303
Voucher: 174631
174632 08/25/2003 000063
Voucher: 174632
174633 08/25/2003 005318
Voucher: 174633
174634 08/25/2003 007612
Voucher: 174634
174635 08/25/2003 003534
Voucher: 174635
174636 08/25/2003 002477
Voucher: 174636
174637 08/25/2003 007613
Voucher: 174637
174638 08/25/2003 003355
Voucher: 174638
174639 08/25/2003 006400
Voucher: 174639
174640 08/25/2003 004356
Voucher: 174640
174641 08/25/2003 005253
Voucher: 174641
174642 08/25/2003 005254
Voucher: 174642
174643 08/25/2003 000061
Voucher: 174643
PETTY CASH-WITNESS FEES AUG 2003
KING COUNTY RECORDS&EL 02-0052877
ALLEN, LYNETTE
ARBUTHNOT, STEVEN
BIRD, KRISTA
EMPL REIMB
EMPL REIMB
EMPL REIMB
CORPORATE EXPRESS OFF 12036338
DEYO, DARLENE
DRAKE, WILLIAM E
HALL, PAM
HOME DEPOT
MERGEL, SHERYL
MURPHY, CARY
PARKER, TAMI
SUMPTER, KYLE
U S BANCORP
U S BANCORP
EMPL REIMB
EMPL REIMB
EMPL REIMB
7031628
9031238
EMPL REIMB
EMPL REIMB
EMPL REIMB
EMPL REIMB
JULY 2003
JULY 2003
WA STATE REVENUE DEPAR 601-223-5385
Inv Date Descril~tion
Amount Paid Check Total
08/21/2003 MSF-REIM WITNESS FUND P
08/25/2003 CD-KC RECORDING FEE
08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN
08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN
08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN
07/31/2003 JULY OFFICE SUPPLIES-COR
08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN
08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN
08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN
07/09/2003 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI
07/07/2003 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINTENAN
08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN
08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN
08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN
08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN
08/06/2003 CITY VISA CHARGES FOR (J
08/06/2003 PS-CITY VISA CHARGES FO
08/20/2003 MSF-REMIT SALES/USE TAX
467.77 467.77
96.00 96.00
228.46 228.46
7.91 7.91
406.85 406.85
2,715.61 2,715.61
48.15 48.15
165.62 165.62
515.09 515.09
39.06
16.10 55.16
172.37 172.37
72.30 72.30
28.18 28.18
39.02 39.02
4,316.41 4,316.41
1,766.80 1,766.80
4,024.61 4,024.61
Page: I
apChkLst
08/2612003 1:45:09PM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 2
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
Inv Date Descril~tion
Amount Paid
Check Total
174644 08/25/2003 003521
Voucher: 174644
WILSON, GREG
EMPL REIMB
08/22/2003 PS-MAHER FUNERAL EXPEN
315.60
Sub total for us bank:
315.60
15,441.91
Page: 2
apChkLst
08~26~2003 1:45:09PM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 3
18 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks:
15,441.91
Page: 3
fi-
apChkLst
08129/2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 1
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor
Invoice
174645 08/26/2003 007385
Voucher: 174645
174646 08/26/2003 007385
Voucher: 174646
174647 08/27/2003 003464
Voucher: 174647
174648 08/27/2003 007238
Voucher: 174648
174649 08/29/2003 000332
Voucher: 174649
174650 08/29/2003 007583
Voucher: 174650
-~ 174651 08/29/2003 000109
Voucher: 174651
174652 08/29/2003 007318
Voucher: 174652
174653 08/29/2003 000475
Voucher: 174653
174654 08/29/2003 007166
Voucher: 174654
174655 08/29/2003 001285
Voucher: 174655
174656 08/29/2003 003427
Voucher: 174656
174657 08/29/2003 003129
Voucher: 174657
174658 08/29/2003 005501
Voucher: 174658
174659 08/29/2003 001378
Voucher: 174659
174660 08/29/2003 006211
Voucher: 174660
GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTG 982004776
GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTG 982004776
KING COUNTY SUPERIOR CO797820 0045
PETTY CASH: JURY FEES AUGUST/03
ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS I 0065793-1N
0881718-1N
ACROPRINT TIME RECORDE 0000046386
ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL 13320
ADVANCED SAFETY & FIRE S 105938
ALARM CENTERS/CUSTOM S
ALLEN, KAREN
ALPINE PRODUCTS INC
AMERICAN LOCKER SECURI
AMS LASER SUPPLY
ANDREWS, AMY
APPLIED INDUSTRIAL
AQUATECHNEX, INC.
291052
7/23/2003
TM-58405
443212
343946
260968CR
260969
8/5/O3
8/19/03
CA 30632FW
40281805
289
Inv Date Descril~tion
07/16/2003
08/18/2003
08/27/2003
08/27/2003
07~30~2003
07/23/2003
07/21/2003
07/30/2003
08/18/2003
07/20/2003
07/23/2003
08/12/2003
07/19/2003
08/08/2003
08/01/2003
08/05/2003
08/05/2003
08/19/2003
08/19/2003
08/1412003
08/14/2003
MORTGATE PYMT PARAGO
MORTGATE PYMT PARAGO
PWSCIP-ROW STLMT 02-2
PETTY CASH- JURY FEES
LAW-MONTHLY SRV. CHRG /
LAW-MONTHLY SRV. CHRG /
PS-RIBBON:OFFICE TIME ST
PKM-GRD MTN LocKSMITH
PS-MAINTENANCE:FIRE EXT
PKCHB-ALRM MNTR SVC AU
PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C
PWS-SURVEYORS VEST XX
PS-POLICE RIFLE CABINET R
MSDP-PRINTER TONER-
MS/PS-PRINTER TONER-
MS/PS-PRINTER TONER-
INTERPRETER SVCS
INTERPRETER SVCS
INTERPRETER SVCS
PS-FINGERPRINT SUPPLIES
AG03-55:2003 ST LK AQUATI
Amount Paid
48,429.50
48,429.50
13,141.00
468.48
96.00
5.00
37.18
27.74
54.40
103.00
25.00
59.84
27.70
382.76
-71.75
-71.75
60.00
50.00
40.00
212.64
979.20
Check Total
48,429.50
48,429.50
13,141.00
468.48
101.00
37.18
27.74
54.40
103.0O
25.00
59.84
27.70
239.26
150.00
212.64
979.20
Page: I
apChkLst
08129/2003 10:22:05AM
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Invoice
Inv Date Descril~tion
Amount Paid
Page: 2
Check Total
174661 08/29/2003 002534
Voucher: 174661
174662 08/29/2003 005715
Voucher: 174662
174663 08/29/2003 005718
Voucher: 174663
174664 08/29/2003 000437
Voucher: 174664
174665 08/29/2003 000075
Voucher: 174665
174666 08/29/2003 000075
Voucher: 174666
174667 08/29/2003 000575
Voucher: 174667
174668 08/29/2003 007615
Voucher: 174668
174669 08129/2003 000004
Voucher: 174669
174670 08/29/2003 002386
Voucher: 174670
174671 08/29/2003 000792
Voucher: 174671
174672 08/29/2003 007588
Voucher: 174672
174673 08/29/2003 007538
Voucher: 174673
174674 08/29/2003 004158
Voucher: 174674
174675 08/29/2003 005645
Voucher: 174675
ARBORSCAN INC 3464
ARCH WIRELESS HOLDINGS IM6163838H
ARCHITECREATION INC MSC-03-0347
ASSOCIATED COURIERS INC 293777
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES I 20405718
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES I 26837633
ATTORNEYS' INFORMATION E55396
AUTOZONE INC 02-50394
AWC-ASSOC OF WASHINGT 6254
2003 PFCS
BANH EGYI / PAWLAK, SUSAN 8/18/03
BARRY'S TRUCKING & LAND
BELL, 'CAROL D
BELMORE MOBILE HOME PA
BERNER, ILYA S
BERTUCCI, MICHAEL
8/21/03
8/22/03
212003
21 O467
212005
210468
210469
212004
EMPL REIMB
03-01-091-33
8/18/03
EMPLO REMIB
08/06/2003
08/02/2003
08/05/2003
07/28/2003
08/02/2003
08/12/2003
07/31/2003
08~20/2003
07/30/2003
08/22/2003
08/18/2003
08/21/2003
08/22/2003
08/05/2003
07/28/2003
08/05/2003
07/28/2003
07/28/2003
08/05/2003
08/06/2003
07/16/2003
08/18/2003
08/12/2003
PKMT/TREE PRUNING;~
MSTEL-PAGER LEASE 8131
PKM-TOT sWiNGS
CDB - COURIER PLANS FOR
MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME~
MSTEL~CELL AIR TIME~
LAW-AUG 03 MEMBERSHIP
PW-REFUND BOND REL#02
MSF-2003 BUDGT & FISCAL
MSHR-'03 POLICE/FIRE COM
INTERPRETER SERVICES
INTERPRETER SERVICES
INTERPRETER SERVICES
AG02-79:LANDSCAPING AND
AG02-79:LANDSCAPING AND
DBC-DEBRIS REMOVAL SER
AG02-79:LANDSCAPING AND
AG02-79:LANDSCAPING AND
AG02-79:LANDSCAPING AND
PRCS-MISC CRAFT SUPPLIE
MSR-DAMAGE FENCE LST D
INTERPRETER SERVICES
PS-REIMB:UNIFORM BOOT A
212.16
1,098.30
250.24
17.60
1,019.20
26.00
24.50
1,634.00
145.00
85.00
227.50
202.50
87.50
930.24
620.16
571.20
554.88
489.60
413.44
73.11
367.74
320.00
104.98
212.16
1,098.30
250.24
17.60
1,019.20
26.00
24.50
1,634.00
230.00
517.50
3,579.52
73.11
367.74
320.00
104.98
Page: 2
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 3
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
174676 08/29/2003 003440 BILL HATCH SPORTS
Voucher: 174676
90350-00
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid Check Total
07/31/2003 PRCS-ATHLETIC SUPPLIES/
439.40 439.40
Page: 3
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
174678 08/29/2003 001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO I
Voucher: 174678
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Invoice
Inv Date Descril~tion
Amount Paid
314593
305538
3O6594
313996
285505
315538
315951
316437
314281
315965
315142
314032
311578
314593-01
311520
316363
315142-01
312343
316361
316360
316365
316232
295368
315434
315961
316364
316367
316596
316154
316155
316366
315403
316597
316359
311003
07~30~2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
07/11/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
07/11/2003 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
07/30/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
04/16/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
08/05/2003-PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
08/06/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
07/25/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
07/30/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
07/30/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
07/17/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
07/30/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
07/18/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
08/06/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
04/08/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
07/31/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
08/04/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
08/06/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
08/04/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
08/04/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
08/06/2003 PS, UNIFORM & ACCES.
08/05/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
07/03/2003 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
762.47
652.80
652.80
417.47
416.16
328.14
261.01
261.01
246.38
234.90
234.90
231.58
194.64
173.64
146.83
141.39
117.45
116.04
107.56
103.25
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
95.69
95.69
95.69
95.69
95.69
94.06
85.08
76.01
76.00
65.28
Page: 4
Check Total
Page: 4
apChkLst
08~29/2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 5
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
174679 08/29/2003 000007
Voucher: 174679
BOISE OFFICE SOLUTIONS
293467
312117
312406
313302
313055
313996-01
316368
314890
300951-02
316259
020936
018239
204458
896279
228775
050028
.022123
131119
076389
179059
240270
981899
774301
084546
904055
1141962
022760
759979
906939
926266
084547
129957
131027
074755
Inv Date
03/28/2003
07/31/2003
07/17/2003
07/18/2003
08/05/2003
08/05/2003
08/05/2003
07/31/2003
07/31/2003
08/06/2003
07/16/2003
07/16/2003
07/30/2003
07/08/2003
07/31/2003
07/18/2003
07/16/2003
O7/24/20O3
07/21/2003
07/28/2003
07/31/2003
07/14/2003
06/26/2003
07/21/2003
07/08/2003
07/24/20O3
07/16/2003
06/25/2003
07/08/2003
07/09/2003
07/24/2003
07/24/2003
07/24/2003
07/21/2003
Description
PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
PS- UNIFORM & ACCESS.
PS- UNIFORM & ACCES.
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
OFFICE SUPPLIES (JULY/03)
Amount Paid
58.43
52.17
47.82
21.71
20.67
20.67
14.04
10.87
7.18
7.07
245.99
169.85
143.57
135.86
60.87
60.81
55.16
52.06
44.83
35.85
33.43
26.09
23.94
16.80
15.87
10.95
6.66
4.90
4.12
4.12
3.06
2.73
-14.10
-44.83
Check Total
7,435.93
1,098.59
Page: 5
apChkLst
08129/2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 6
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
174680 08/29/2003 007623
Voucher: 174680
174681 08/29/2003 007519
Voucher: 174681
174682 08/29/2003 007624
Voucher: 174682
174683 08/29/2003 000414
Voucher: 174683
174684 08/29/2003 000991
Voucher: 174684
174685 08/29/2003 003093
Voucher: 174685
174686 08/29/2003 005622
Voucher: 174686
174687 08/29/2003 006744
Voucher: 174687
174688 08/29/2003 002472
Voucher: 174688
174689 08/29/2003 000142
Voucher: 174689
174690 08/29/2003 005817
Voucher: 174690
174691 08/29/2003 007586
Voucher: 174691
174692 08/29/2003 003752
Voucher: 174692
174693 08/29/2003 004395
Voucher: 174693
BROWN, JONATHAN
133407
BUSINESS INTERNET SERVI 8642
BYERS, DAWN 133408
CAFE PACIFIC CATERING IN 7148
CASCADE COFFEE INC 20342247
CASCADE COMPUTER MAIN 9073692
CHELAN COUNTY TREASURE450001-00064
CHOU, DONG JUN
DONG CHOU
CHURCH COUNCIL OF SEAT 2003 DIRECT
CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE
CITY OF FIFE
CITY OF SEATTLE
CK~2050
CK#2058
CK¢2059
0000668
0000695
AG03-150
COASTWlDE SUPPLY DBA
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICA
T1247706
T1242619
T1236806-1
W1242473
T1244654-1
W123344-1
W1243344
0220-423433
0220-423763
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
08/19/2003 PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D
50.00
6,500.00
50.00
355.24
95.42
625.60
7,152.00
461.40
140.00
08/14/2003 MIS-CITY WEB REDESIGN S~
08/19/2003 PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D
08/26/2003 CM-JAPENSE DELEGATION E
08/11/2003 MSM&D-MTG COFFEE SUPP
08/11/2003 MSDP-PRINTER MAINT
06/05/2003 PS-JAIL SERVICES MAY 2003
08/20/2003 EMPLOYEE EXPENSES REI
08/19/2003 PKDBC-AD:2003 CHURCH CC
07/16/2003
08~1/2003
08/21/2003
06/16/2003
07/02/2003
06/12/2003
PS-TRVL EXP:WSLEFIA CON
PW-TRVL EXP:APWA CONF (
PW-TRVL EXP:APWA CONF (
PS-JAIL SERVICES 5/03
PS-JAIL SERVICES 6/03
AG03-150:REINVESTING IN Y
359.84
159.00
159.00
19,530.00
19,089.00
5,000.00
08/13D003
07/31~003
08/04~003
07/31~003
08/07~003
08/12/2003
08/07~003
08/04~003
08/12~003
PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLI
PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL
PKDBC-HOUSEHOLD SUPPL
MC-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES~
PRCS-KJP JANITORIAL SUP
PKCP-HOUSEHOLD SUPPLI
PKCP-HOUSEHOLD SUPPLI
PRCS-EMERG LITE BATTER
PKMCHB-LIGHTING SUPPLI
218.81
201.17
87.02
80.54
68.7.0
12.35
12.35
150.27
41.78
Check Total
50.00
6,500.00
50.00
355.24
95.42
625.60
7,152.00
461.40
140.00
677.84
38,619.00
5,000.00
68O.94
192.05
Page: 6
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 7
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
174694 08/29/2003 002790
Voucher: 174694
174695 08/29/2003 004530
Voucher: 174695
174696 08/29/2003 007579
Voucher: 174696
174697 08/29/2003 000854
Voucher: 174697
174698 08/29~003 000939
Voucher: 174698
174699 08/29~003 007397
Voucher: 174699
174700 08D9/2003 007584
Voucher: 174700
174701 08/29/2003 000438
Voucher: 174701
174702 08/29/2003 006156
Voucher: 174702
174703 08~9~003 005341
Voucher: 174703
174704 08/29/2003 007548
Voucher: 174704
174705 08/29~003 005048
Voucher: 174705
174706 08/29/2003 005620
Voucher: 174706
CONSTRUCTION TESTING L
CWA CONSULTANTS
D & M PLUMBING INC
D J TROPHY
DANONE WATERS OF NORT
DAVID A CLARK ARCHITECT
DECATUR ELECTRONICS
DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE J
DESTINATION WIRELESS
DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA
DOXTATER & COMPANY LLC
DUPONT FLOORING SYSTE
DUTTON PROMOTIONAL AD
9597
03-271
1107100420
00211491
5276416-15
5277089-15
5276414-15
5276424-15
4956834-15
5276412-15
195
00112867
00112980CR
3737
10347
10460
6/24/03
8/12/03
8/18/03
8/15/03
8/19/03
071603
4358-052
19048
Inv Date
08/18/2003
08/01/2003
07/30D003
07/18/2003
07/01/2003
07/01/2003
07/01/2003
07/01/2003
06/30/2003
07/01/2003
08/18/2003
08/05/2003
08/08/2003
08/06/2003
08/01/2003
08/18D003
06D4~003
08/12/2003
08/18/2003
08/15/2003
08/19/2003
07/16/2003
07/16~003
07D2/2003
DescriDtion
Amount Paid
PWAD-MATERIALS TESTING
413.40
270.00
369.92
197.55
CDB - PLAN REVIEW SERVIC
PKDBC-PLUMBING REPAIRS
PRCS-BLACK MARBLE BASE
PKCHB-WTR/CL RNTL ACC
PKM-WTR/CLR RNTL ACCT
PKDBC-WTR/CL RNTL ACCT
MC-WATER/CLR RNTL ACC
PKKFT-WTR/CL RNTL ACCT#
PKCP-WTR/CLR RNTL ACCT~
AG03-51 :PARAGON BLDG-DU
268.08
152.75
109.65
52.00
17.41
6.53
33,860.29
PS-GENESIS GHS RADARS:
Freight
LUNCH FOR INTERAGENCY F
1,798.62
-30.00
134.44
PS-QTRMASTER PHONE REF
PS-PHONE REPAIR SERVIC
INTERPRETER SERVICES
INTERPRETER SERVICES
INTERPRETER SERVICES
INTERPRETER SERVICES
INTERPRETER SERVICES
AG03-66:EVENTS PLANNING
35.00
25.00
140.00
90.00
90.00
80.00
80.00
15,000.00
PKDBC-CARPET CLEANING~
656.36
CM-NEW CITY LOGO LAPEL
837.21
Check Total
413.40
270.00
369.92
197.55
606.42
33,860.29
1,768.62
134.44
60.00
480.00
15,000.00
656.36
837.21
Page: 7
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 8
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
174707 08/29/2003 000570
Voucher: 174707
174708 08/29/2003 007621
Voucher: 174708
174709 08/29/2003 007585
Voucher: 174709
174710 08/29/2003 007540
Voucher: 174710
174711 08/29/2003 000343
Voucher: 174711
174712 08/29/2003 005639
Voucher: 174712
EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE
EALY, PATRICE
(1028371
1027988
1028039
1O28487
1028519
1027993
1028038
1027154
1028477
1028493
1027031
1027987
1027922
1028180
1028418
1028242
1028505
1028518
1O28529
1028536
1028152
1028274
1028594
1028298
1028428
131967
EARTH TECH ENTERPRISES 10729035
0729035
ELECTROTECHNICS CORPOF0033860-1N
ELEPHANT CAR WASH 200
ELLINGTON, THOMAS MARK 8/7/03
8/15/03
08/04/2003
07/16/2003
07/18/2003
08/08/2003
08/09/2003
07/16/2003
07/18/2003
06~09~2003
08/08/2003
08/08/2003
06~03~2003
07/16/2003
07/14/2003
07/25/2003
08/05/2003
07/29/2003
08/09/2003
08/09/2003
08/09/2003
08/09/2003
07/24/2003
07/30/2003
08/12/2003
07/31/2003
08/06/2003
08/11/2003
08/01/2003
08/01/2003
07/03/2003
07/31/2003
09/07/2003
08/15~003
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES
MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/TlR
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES
MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/TlR
MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/TlR
MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/TlR
MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/TlR
PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/TIRES
PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES
PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C
AG03-145:LNDSCP MTN (PA
AG03-145:LNDSCP MTN (PA
PW/TR-SCHOOL FLASHERS-
PS-CAR WASH SERVICE JUL
PROTEMJUDGE
PRO TEMJUDGE
632.24
422.79
368.61
272.17
232.97
165.59
165.59
147.10
138.67
92.34
87.67
83.18
82.79
80.07
57.63
28.84
27.19
27.19
27.19
27.19
24.47
18.49
18.49
13.32
13.32
38.40
436.28
309.73
1,320.00
829.12
200.00
125.00
3,255.10
38.40
746.01
1,320.00
829.12
325.00
Page:8
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 9
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
174713 08/29/2003 007283
Voucher: 174713
174714 08/29/2003 002887
Voucher: 174714
174715 08/29/2003 001046
Voucher: 174715
174716 08/29/2003 007632
Voucher: 174716
174717 08/29/2003 000328
Voucher: 174717
174718 08/29/2003 004840
Voucher: 174718
174719 08~9/2003 001748
Voucher: 174719
174720 08/29/2003 007082
Voucher: 174720
174721 08/29/2003 001297
Voucher: 174721
174722 08/29~003 000217
Voucher: 174722
174723 08/29/2003 000229
Voucher: 174723
EMERALD AIRE INC
44436
EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 90600928
EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMAT17004341
ERB, WILLIAM ERB
ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA)
EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE
EVERSON'S ECONO-VAC INC
EXPANETS
0137761
0138978
0138977
102325
102113
102333
102332
10231'6
102356
102371
102091
102354
101934CR
023561
022930-A
20488193
FACILITY MAINTENANCE CO 135-008
138-007
137-008
134-008
136-008
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPOR4-846-20941
FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER CO2352
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
08/01/2003 CITYHALL-HVAC SERVICES-
130.56
656.00
21.76
20.00
07/24/2003 MSDP-HP 8150 MAINTENANC
07/24/2003 PS-CREDIT REPORTS JUNE;
05/20/2003 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/19-20/2
07/31/2003
08/15/2003
08/15/2003
07/18/2003
05/14/2003
07~1/2003
07/21/2003
07/14/2003
07~5/2003
07/30/2003
05/08/2003
07~5/2003
07/14/2003
08/11/2003
06/30/2003
08/04/2003
PS-MISC
PS-MISC
PS-MISC
PS-MISC
PS-MISC
PS-MISC
PS-MISC
PS-MISC
PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES (7/
PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES (8/
MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLES
PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES
REPAIR/SUPPLIES
REPAIR/SUPPLIES
REPAIR/SUPPLIES
REPAIR/SUPPLIES
REPAIR/SUPPLIES
REPAIR/SUPPLIES
REPAIR/SUPPLIES
REPAIR/SUPPLIES
PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES
AG03-75:SWM INFRASTRUC'I
AG03-75:CORRECTION OF I
MIS-PBX MAINT FOR 7/31-8
5,668.32
5,465.14
2,468.99
2,395.45
315.52
191.49
191.49
89.22
65.28
65.28
32.64
23.94
-63.10
6,463.39
0.80
1,529.12
08/15~003
07/15~003
08/15~003
08/15/2003
08/15D003
08/08~003
AG01-59A:PKS LNDSCP MNT
AG01-52A:DBC LNDSCP SVC
AG01-59A:PKS LNDSCP MNT
AG01-59A:PKS LNDSCP MNT
AG01-59A:PKS LNDSCP MNT
MSDP-DELIVERY SERVICES
848.64
693.07
608.21
480.90
297.04
48.80
06/27/2003 PS-ADVANCING LEADERSHI
650.00
Check Total
130.56
656.00
21.76
20.00
13,602.45
3,307.21
6,464.19
1,529.12
2,927.86
48.80
650.00
Page: 9
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page:
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
174724 08/29/2003 000285
Voucher: 174724
174725 08/29/2003 004270
Voucher: 174725
174726 08/29/2003 001593
Voucher: 174726
174727 08/29/2003 002962 .
' Voucher: 174727
174728 08/29/2003 000989
Voucher: 174728
174729 08/29/2003 002870
Voucher: 174729
~"'3174730 08/29/2003 004566
Voucher: 174730
~ 174731.08/29/2003 003699
'Voucher: 174731
174732 08/29/2003 007469
Voucher: 174732
174733 08/29/2003 701910
Voucher: 174733
174734 08/29/2003 000671
Voucher: 174734
174735 08/29/2003 007622
Voucher: 174735
174736 08/29/2003 001487
Voucher: 174736
174737 08/29~003 007625
Voucher: 174737
174738 08/29/2003 003560
Voucher: 174738
174739 08/29/2003 001431
Voucher: 174739
FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPART 8/1/03
FEDERAL WAY MIRROR
FEDERAL WAY TOWING INC
004924
004925
LAW SUBSC
16683
FISHER SCIENTIFIC
9065520
FRED MEYER INC
1515740
FREEWAY TRAILER SALES I
G&M HONEST PERFORMANC
022830
022825
54957
GARDNER & ASSOCIATES 2838
GRAY & OSBORNE INC
03562.00-3
GUTIERREZ, KRISTINA C
H D FOWLER COMPANY
HARTEAU, JIM
133411
1334OO
11339129
11344097
11343852
131968
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPA
HOEKS, PaUL
34314999.
34341916
34344979
133410
HUNTERS TREE SERVICE 1251
1250
ICON MATERIALS INC 276218
275048
08/01/2003
08/02D003
08/02D003
08/12D003
06~2~003
07/18/2003
08/05/2003
07/03/2003
07/03/2003
08/09/2003
08/14D003
08/04D003
08/19~003
08/19D003
08/06~003
08/14D003
08/14~003
08/11~003
07~9~003
08/03~003
08/04~003
08/19D003
08/07/2003
08/07~003
08/14D003
08~7~003
PKM-FIRE CODE PERMIT/CE
CDPL-LEGALS~
CDPL-LEGALS~
LAW-NEWSPAPER suBcRI
FILE#03-03-091-262 LOSS DT
PS-SUPPLIES:PROPERTY/EV
PRKCS-DAY CAMP SUPPLIE
PS-STORAGE TRAILER~
MSFLT-VEHICLE REPAIRS/S
MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PS-JR POLICE STICKER BAD~
AG03-56A:51ST AVE SW STO
PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D
PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D
PKM-GD REPAIR/MAINT SUP
PKM-GD REPAIR/MAINT SUP
PKM-GD REPAIR/MAINT SUP
PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C
HP DAT72 DDS DATA CARTR
MSDP/PS COMPAQ DESKTO
HP DAT72 DDS DATA CARTR
PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D
PWS-REMV TREES,CHIP,C
PWS-TREE REMOVAL,CHIP
PWS-STREET REPAIR MTN -
PWS-STREET REPAIR MTN -
100.00
123.50
103.58
29~00
134.91
315.12
12.88
3,173.70
55.42
68.36
380.00
11,581.11
43.40
6.60
373.40
364.91
234.62
72.45
8,908.54
5,065.73
617.98
50.00
2,067.20
1,958.40
849.28
629.35
100.00
256.08
134.91
315.12
12.88
3,229.12
68.36
380.00
11,581.11
50.00
972.93
72.45
14,592.25
50.00
4,025.60
1,478.63
Page: 10
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 11
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
174740 08/29/2003 000016
Voucher: 174740
174741 08/29/2003 007590
Voucher: 174741
174742 08/29/2003 005691
Voucher: 174742
174743 08/29/2003 001240
Voucher: 174743
174744 08/29/2003 005231
Voucher: 174744
~74745 08~9/2003 005128
Voucher: 174745
174746 08/29/2003 003211
Voucher: 174746
174747 08D9/2003 005656
Voucher: 174747
174748 08/29/2003 004096
Voucher: 174748
174749 08/29/2003 007157
Voucher: 174749
174750 08/29/2003 003462
Voucher: 174750
174751 08/29/2003 005934
Voucher: 174751
174752 08D9/2003 002010
Voucher: 174752
174753 08/29/2003 000029
Voucher: 174753
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
IN THE LINE OF DUTY INC
16387905
1644707A
1666026A
C02674
INLAND PACIFIC STAMPS & 0471114
INRO CONSULTANTS INC 16131
lOS CAPITAL INC
59521744
IRELAND NEEDLECRAFT INC 2918
IRON MOUNTAIN/SAFESITE I H379274
JIM'S DETAIL SHOP 1116 F
11107 F
11103 F
JOHNSON CHRISTIE ANDRE 7324
7323
7322
7321
JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATI0014906
JUNKER, RYAN
EMPL REIMB
K P TRANSLATION SERVICE 8/12&8/13/03
7/29/03
7/22/03
8/15/03
KCM INC 140321
KING BELLMARK OF PUGET ~c025160
Inv Date Descri~3tion
Amount Paid
08/05D003
07/03/2003
08/13/2003
07/29D003
MSDP FAX MACHINES MAIN
MSDP/PK-KJP: PRINTER TO
FREIGHT-DBC CANON TONE
PS-TRAINING TAPE-IN THE L
199.25
184.96
16.31
95.00
07/17/2003 CDB- RUBBER STAMPS FO
146.21
540.00
2,628.21
266.00
1,334.21
08/01/2003 MSDP/PW-EMME2 SOF'I'WAR
07/28/2003 MSMD-COPIER RENTAL (8
08/06/2003 MUNICIPAL JUDGE CLOTHIN
07/31/2003 MSC-RECORDS STORAGE S
08/05~003
07~4~003
07/18~003
08/05/2003
08/05/2003
08/05/2003
08/05~003
07/11~003
PS-DETAIL SVCS #650
PS-DETAIL SVCS #505
PS-DETAIL SVCS #630
AG00-60B:PS LEGAL SVCS(4
AG00-60B:PS LEGAL SVCS(3
AG00-60B:PS LEGAL SVCS(4
AG00-60B:PS LEGAL SVCS(5
AG02-136:POTENTIAL ANNE~
139.99
139.00
139.00
1,689.50
1,372.50
137.00
107.50
8,001.96
07/31/2003 PS-REIMB:WATER:SIMUNITI
58.86
08/14/2003
08/01~003
08/01/2003
08/15/2003
08/07/2003
TRANSLATION SERVICES
TRANSLATION SERVICES
TRANSLATION SERVICES
TRANSLATION SERVICES
AG03-48:LAKOTA WETLAND I
209.00
184.50
104.50
104.50
23,574.02
08/14/2003 CDB - MK MARTIN SIGNATUR
35.51
Check Total
4O0.52
95.00
146.21
540.00
2,628.21
266.00
1,334.21
417.99
3,306.50
8,001.96
58.86
602.50
23,574.02
35.51
Page:11
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 12
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
174754 08D9/2003 005568
Voucher: 174754
174755 08~9/2003 007332
Voucher: 174755
174756 08D9D003 000201
Voucher: 174756
174757 08D9/2003 003374
Voucher: 174757
174758 08~9~003 003399
Voucher: 174758
~'~.i74759 08/29/2003 000096
Voucher: 174759
174760 08D9/2003 001939
Voucher: 174760
174761 08~9~003 004052
Voucher: 174761
174762 08/29/2003 005668
Voucher: 174762
174763 08/29/2003 007050
Voucher: 174763
174764 08/29/2003 007599
Voucher: 174764
174765 08/29/2003 000630
Voucher: 174765
KING COUNTY FLEET ADM D1201905
KING COUNTY PARKS DIVIS 14336
KINKO'S INC, ACCOUNT #020
KLINGELE, BRYAN
KVASNYUK, NIKOLAY
LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRI
LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC
515100069299
515100069300
515100069301
515100069359
515100069304
ANTHROPOLO
ANTHROPOLG
8/5 &8/12/03
8115&8119103
3200201
2984001
2832301
0014290
LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIP
LAW OFFICES OF DESMOND
08110301
08090302
08050303
07180302
JUlY 2003
LAW OFFICES OF HAL GEIE 18
LITTLE, LORRAINE
133406
LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC
66142
66206
66094
66095
66005
66004
Inv Date
08/11~003
O7/08/2OO3
08/13~003
08/13D003
08/13D003
08/19D003
08/13~003
06~0D003
08/12D003
08/15~003
08~0~003
08/19~003
08/11~003
08/11~003
07/31/2003
08/11~003
08/08~003
08/05~003
07/14~003
07/31~003
08/15/2003
08/19~003
07/31/2003
08/05/2003
07/28/2003
07/26/2003
07/21/2003
07/24/2003
Description
Amount Paid
PWS-MATERIALS/SUPPLIES,
1,250.60
348.00
PRCS-SPECIAL OLY-FEDERA
MSCK-PRINTING SERVICES
PS-PRINTING SERVICES
PS-PRINTING SERVICES
PVVST-PRINTING SERVICES
PVVST-PRINTING SERVICES
MSHR-EDUC ASSNT/TUITI
PS-POLICE BUSINESS REIM
DISTRICT COURT INTERPRE
DISTRICT COURT INTERPRE
PWS-WATER SVCS~
PKM-FAC/VVATER SVCS
PKM-FAC/VVATER SVCS
AG 02-11 A: SWM-G EOTEC H N I
452.87
184.21
81.60
12.36
9.79
542.20
389.71
110.00
110.00
221.14
16.74
14.48
3,431.74
PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT
PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT
PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT
PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT
AG01-62B:PUBLIC DEFENSE
285.22
142.80
137.09
22.68
750.00
AG02-125:PUBLIC DEFENDEF 23,382.50
PKRCS-REFUND RENTAL DE
40.00
PKM-STONE/GRAVEL SUPPL
PKM-STONE/GRAVEL SUPPL
PKM-STONE/GRAVEL SUPPL
PKM-STONE/GRAVEL SUPPL
PWS-DUMP CLEAN CONCRE
PWS-MEDIUM BARK~
619.59
472.19
358.46
131.70
110.57
14.63
Check Total
1,250.60
348.00
740.83
931.91
220.00
252.36
3,431.74
587.79
750.00
23,382.50
40.00
1,707.14
Page: 12
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 13
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
174766 08/29/2003 007221
Voucher: 174766
174767 08/29/2003 004431
Voucher: 174767
174768 08/29/2003 007331
Voucher: 174768
174769 08/29/2003 000960
Voucher: 174769
174770 08/29/2003 004881
Voucher: 174770
174771 08/29/2003 000370
Voucher: 174771
174772 08/29/2003 004182
Voucher: 174772
174773 08/29/2003 007626
Voucher: 174773
174774 08/29/2003 000286
Voucher: 174774
174775 08/29/2003 001793
Voucher: 174775
174776 08/29/2003 006664
Voucher: 174776
174777 08/29/2003 003170
Voucher: 174777
174778 08/29/2003 007501
Voucher: 174778
174779 08/29/2003 007616
Voucher: 174779
174780 08/29/2003 005004
Voucher: 174780
174781 08/29/2003 001843
Voucher: 174781
M&W BUILDING SUP CO INC 8/7/03
8/7/03
MADRONA PLANNING DVLP 00002852
00002851
MAIL ADVERTISING BUREAU 31939
MATTHEW BENDER & COMP 66860423
MCALLESTER, MELANIE
MCCLUNG, KATHY
MCDONOUGH & SONS INC
MELCHIOR, MICHAEL
EMPL REIMB
7/29/03
129238
133404
METROCALL WIRELESS INC 00784647
MICROFLEX INC
MITCHELL, JAMIE
MODERN SECURITY SYSTE
MORED, LARNIE
OO014426
00014470
BASKETBALL
36553
133401
MORGAN SPENCER & SMITH 02-43290
MORRIS HANSEN ENTERPRI 11585
MORRIS PIHA REAL ESTATE ,~988-SEPT03
985-SEPT03
987-SEPT03
989-SEPT03
2937-SEPT03
08/07/2003
08/07/2003
08/06/2003
08/06/2003
07/01/2003
07/25/2003
08/06/2003
07/29/2003
08/12/2003
08/19/2003
08/01/2003
08/01/2003
08/13/2003
08/06/2003
07/25/2003
08/19/2003
08/18/2003
07/24/2003
08/21/2003
08/21/2003
08/21/2003
08/21/2003
08/21/2003
PKM-PARTIAL PAYMENT TO
PKM-CONCRETE/PRE-MIX F
CD-EXPR:RAINIER PACIFIC B
CD-EXPR:WALGREEN'S DRU
CM-MAILING SERVICES FOR
LAW-WA APP. RPRTS VOL 1
PS-REIMB: BEV:TRAINING S
SUPPLIES FOR EMPLOYEE A
AG01-95A:PKNG LOT VACUUI
PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D
MSTEL-PAGER SVC FOR 8t
MSDP/FI-TAXTOOLS SOFTWJ
MSA-TAX AUDIT PROGRAM
PRCS-BASKETBALL REFERE
PKM-ALARM MONITORING S
PKRCS-REFUND RENTAL D
PW-REFUND BOND REL#00
PKCHB-WINDOW CLEANING
AG98-212B:PS BLDG LEASES
AG99-139A:MC BLDG LEASE~
AG98-212B:PS BLDG LEASE
AG98-212B:PS BLDG LEASE
AG93-51:KLCC PARKING LO
14,165.00
720.00
460.20
410.40
1,259.23
21.41
58.46
102.51
261.12
50.00
3.52
1,251.00
53.47
336.00
34.82
30.00
1,756.00
220.00
13,334.60
6,964.00
4,571.40
3,106.00
509.90
14,885.00
870.60
1,259.23
21.41
58.46
102.51
261.12
50.00
3.52
1,304.47
336.00
34.82
30.00
1,756.00
220.00
28,485.90
Page: 13
apChkLst
08/29/2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 14
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
Inv Date Descril~tion
Amount Paid
Check Total
174782 08/29/2003 000041
Voucher: 174782
174783 08/29/2003 001902
Voucher: 174783
174784 08/29/2003 005532
Voucher: 174784
174785 08/29/2003 001052
Voucher: 174785
174786 08/29/2003 004426
Voucher: 174786
174787 08/29/2003 003138
Voucher: 174787
174788 08/29/2003 007618
Voucher: 174788
174789 08/29/2003 003529
Voucher: 174789
174790 08/29/2003 007589
Voucher: 174790
174791 08/29/2003 006408
Voucher: 174791
174792 08/29/2003 007444
Voucher: 174792
174793 08/29/2003 000504
Voucher: 174793
174794 08/29/2003 000112
Voucher: 174794
174795 08/29/2003 000315
Voucher: 174795
174796 08/29/2003 005293
Voucher: 174796
MURTOUGH SUPPLY COMPA 183411
MYERS MASTER LAWN CAR 606
605
NACM-NATIONAL ASSOCIATI 4112
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NASRO-NATIONAL ASSOCIA
NORMED
711409
710955
711222
3481WA
3524WA
12378-418211
O'NEILL PLUMBING CO
03-102231-00
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SE 82679-001
OFFICERS ONLY INCORPORA1440
OLSON, MICHAEL
EMPL REIMB
ORCA PACIFIC INC
ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER
006948
006778
006463
006777
02228
PACIFIC COAST FORD INC 264686
PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE
PEOPLE'S TRANSLATION SE
~538617
538618
480980
3262
3276
08/08/2003
08/01~003
08/01D003
08/05/2003
08/06/2003
08/04D003
08/05D003
07~1/2003
08/14/2003
07/17~003
08/14~003
07/31/2003
07/25/2003
08/18D003
08/06/2003
08/06/2003
07/21/2003
08/06/2003
06/02/2003
08/06D003
07/24/2003
08/06/2003
07~28~2003
08/12/2003
08/14/2003
PS-HOUSEHOLD SUPPLIES
AG01-66A:LANDSCAPE MNT ,'
AG01-66A:LANDSCAPE MNT ,'
MC-MEMBERSHIP GINA HOF
MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES
MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWST-REPAIR & MAINT SU
PS-POLICE SEMINAR SERVI
PS-POLICE SEMINAR SERVI
PS-GLOVES/SAFETY SUPPL
CD-REFUND PLUMB PRMT 0
PS-PHYSICAL FIT-FOR-DUTY
PS-HANDCUFF RESTRAINTS
MSF-LODGING REIMB BUGT.
AG03-154:CHEMICAL SVCS~
AG03-154:CHEMICAL SVCS~
AG03-154:CHEMICAL SVCS~
AG03-154:CHEMICAL SVCS~
PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI
PS-VEHICLE REPAIRS/MAIN
PVVT-MERIDIAN COURT AP
PWST-TITLE REPORTS
PWST-TITLE REPORTS
INTERPRETER SERVICES
INTERPRETER SERVICES
96.93
1,853.72
520.15
75.00
49.48
22.50
12.94
425.00
295.00
223.69
44.00
260.00
322.95
196.77
138.34
83.00
75.89
75.89
38.91
475.46
359.04
359.04
359.04
50.00
50.00
96.93
2,373.87
75.00
84.92
720.00
223.69
44.00
260.00
322.95
196.77
373.12
38.91
475.46
1,077.12
100.00
Page: 14
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 15
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
174797 08/29/2003 002007
Voucher: 174797
174798 08/29/2003 001189
Voucher: 174798
174799 08/29/2003 001166
Voucher: 174799
174800 08~9~003 007470
Voucher: 174800
174801 08D9/2003 005682
Voucher: 174801
174802 08D9~003 001612
Voucher: 174802
174803 08/29D003 005583
Voucher: 174803
~-.~174804 08/29/2003 006079
Voucher: 174804
'"~174805 08/29/2003 000051
Voucher: 174805
174806 08/29/2003 005977
Voucher: 174806
174807 08/29/2003 007619
Voucher: 174807
174808 08/29/2003 006860
Voucher: 174808
174809 08/29/2003 000202
Voucher: 174809
PETPRO PRODUCTS INC 30157
PETTY CASH - CM OFFICE
PETTY CASH - KLAHANEE
PETTY CASH - MGMT. SVC.
PLF INC 8990
POLLARD GROUP INC 63028
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC
PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER, IN
PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC
PURE HEALTH SOLUTIONS I
PUYALLUP SCHOOL DISTRI
QUIGG BROS INC
QWEST
CM 8/26/03
KLCC 8/22/03
017617
182896
276131N
378-488-6325
109-922-1002
722-288-1000
918-041-1002
319-041-1003
002-141-1004
177-159-1003
699-699-1003
102-141-1002
711-141-1000
31283
C2414 R4845
2O6516
206501
206499
253-Z04-0609
253-815-9920
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
08/11/2003 PKM-PET WASTE DISPOSAB
08/26/2003 PARKING~REIMB FOR PAT R
580.75
288.63
175.75
322.62
323.09
113.58
488.23
52.75
08/22/2003 PRCS-PARKING FOR MT. RA
08/26/2003 CD- 2004 WEEKLY DESK GRE
07/25/2003 PS-PATROL SUPPLIES/EQU
08/13/2003 MSHR-BUSINESS CARDS
08/08/2003 PKM-CUTTING TORCH SUPP
07/22/2003 PS-FINGERPRINT SUPPLIES
08/18/2003
08/14/2003
08/14/2003
08/14/2003
08/14/2003
08/14/2003
08/14/2003
07/18/2003
08/14/2003
08/14/2003
08/11/2003
PS- UTLITIES
P KM-UTI LITI ES
PKM-UTILITIES
PKM-UTILITIES
PKM-UTILITIES
PKM-UTILITIES
PKM-UTILITIES
PWS-ELECTRICITY CHRGS ~
PKM-UTILITIES
P KM-UTI LITI ES
PS-BOTTLED WATER SVc
3,016.17
839.68
379.09
320.62
58.86
34.31
21.81
5.85
5.84
5.84
391.68
08/19/2003 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE
150.00
08/08/2003
08/04/2003
08/05/2003
08/04/2003
08/04/2003
PWS-ASPHALT 23RD AVE S ~
PWS-MARINE VIEW SAND A
PWS-MARINE VIEW SAND A
MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 8
MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 8
98.63
49.02
45.19
4,762.13
64.30
Check Total
580.75
288.63
175.75
322.62
323.09
113.58
488.23
52.75
4,688.07
391.68
150.00
192.84
4,826.43
Page:15
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 16
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
174810 08/29/2003 007521
Voucher: 174810
174811 08/29/2003 006239
Voucher: 174811
174812 08/29/2003 002399
Voucher: 174812
174813 08/29/2003 007627
Voucher: 174813
174814 08/29/2003 005939
Voucher: 174814
174815 08/29/2003 007297
Voucher: 174815
174816 08/29/2003 700320
Voucher: 174816
174817 08/29/2003 007516
Voucher: 174817
174818 08~29/2003 003761
Voucher: 174818
174819 08/29/2003 006441
Voucher: 174819
174820 08/29/2003 000759
Voucher: 174820
174821 08/29/2003 006657
Voucher: 174821
174822 08/29/2003 005703
Voucher: 174822
174823 08/29/2003 007567
Voucher: 174823
174824 08/29/2003 005984
Voucher: 174824
174825 08/29/2003 007628
Voucher: 174825
174826 08/29/2003 007226
Voucher: 174826
RAJUL, MAFE 7/3/03
8/6/03
RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURIN(180409
RECOGNITION PLUS 11618
REIGSTAD, JANICE 133409
RIGHT BRAIN UNLIMITED LL 23628
ROBERTS, BRIAN OPEN HOUSE
RODGERS DEU~SCH & TUR 797820 0025
ROXANNE MICHAEL CUST SVC TR
ROYAL WALDOCK & ASSOCl 2234
RYAN-CONNELLY, LESLIE NTRL RES EC
S & S WORLDWIDE, INC 4350095
S C I INFRASTRUCTURE LLC AG02-58#12
SAFEWAY STORE #3501
SANDWICK, JOLENE
SCHOOL DAZE INC
SCOTT, ADRIAN
SEATAC TRANSMISSION
823692
133812
133813
205864
133402
169456
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid Check Total
07/03/2003 MC- INTERPRETER SERVICE
08/06/2003 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE
08/05/2003 PS-K9 EQUIPMENT/SUPPLIE
07/02/2003 PRCS-ADULT SOFTBALL TR
08/19/2003 PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D
07/28/2003 PKM-DOG WASTE SUPPLIES
08/05/2003 PWSCIP-PIZZA FOR OPEN H
08/19/2003 PWSCIP-02-2-19486-9 KNT/
06/25/2003 CDB - cuSTOMER SERVICE '
06/24/2003 PKMT/BACKFLOW TESTING ,~
03/24/2003 MSHR-EDUC ASSNT/TUITI
07/29/2003 PRCS-12-FT PARACHUTE
07/20/2003 AG02-58C:PAC HWY S HOV L
08/05/2003 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
08/21/2003 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C
08/21/2003 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C
07/23/2003 PRCS - PRESCHOOL SUPPLII
08/19/2003 PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D
07/30/2003 PS-TRANSMISSION SERVIC
45.00
45.00 90.0O
85.80 85.80
1,272.96 1,272.96
50.00 50.00
336.34 336.34
51.18 51.18
750.00 750.00
300.00 300.00
50.00 50.00
588.80 588.80
32.83 32.83
734,126.47 734,126.47
10.77 10.77
15.00
5.00 20.00
9.63 9.63
50.00 50.00
353.60 353.60
Page: 16
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 17
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
174827 08/29/2003 000055
Voucher: 174827
174828 08/29/2003 000351
Voucher: 174828
174829 08/29/2003 000106
Voucher: 174829
174830 08/29/2003 002231
Voucher: 174830
174831 08/29/2003 001480
Voucher: 174831
174832 08/29/2003 002501
Voucher: 174832
174833 08/29/2003 005497
Voucher: 174833
~'~174834 08/29/2003 004963
Voucher: 174834
174835 08/29/2003 000723
Voucher: 174835
174836 08/29/2003 000002
Voucher: 174836
174837 08/29/2003 007617
Voucher: 174837
SEATTLE TIMES
073102119
SEATTLE TIMES-SUBSCRIPT
SELECT TRAVEL INC
SHELDON & ASSOCIATES IN
3O446434
4068O431
307281021
308141000
97122
SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 7779-3
SHOPE CONCRETE PRODUC'116259
107985
SKINNER, BILL MILEAGE REIM
SOUND PUBLISHING INC 10635
SOUND RESOURCE MGMT G FWA-007
SOUND VIEW AUTO BODY I 1765
SOUTH CAMPUS PLACE LLC 02-42546
08/02/2003
08/05/2003
07/31/2003
07/28/2003
08/14/2003
07/31/2003
08/19/2003
12/23/2002
11/29/2001
08/18/2003
08/05/2003
07/31/2003
07/11/2003
08/11/2003
MSHR-NEWSPAPER AD
CM-SEATTLE P-I NEWSPAPE
PS-NEWSPAPER SUBCRIPT
PS-AIRFARE:ClTY TRAVEL S
PS-AIRFARE:VOLUNTEER G
CD-ENPR:WETLAND DTMNT
PKM-PAINT SUPPLIES
PKM-CATCH BASIN/GRATE/
PKM-DPLCT PYM CK#163941
PS-MILEAGE REIMBURSEMEI
PKRCS-WINTER QUARTER B
AG00-154A:SOL WST/RECY C
FILE#03-03-091-262 LOSS DT
PW-REFUND BOND REL#00
772.99
39.00
30.55
565.00
300.00
157.50
288.10
234.46
-201.81
99.58
5,970.63
759.24
1,559.64
4,543.00
772.99
69.55
865.00
157.50
288.10
32.65
99.58
5,970.63
759.24
1,559.64
4,543.00
Page: 17
apChkLst
08/29/2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 18
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
174838 08/29/2003 001885
Voucher: 174838
174~3~. 08/29/2003 001618
,~ 40 Voucher: 174839
1748 08/29/2003 005602
Voucher: i 74840
174841 08/2912003 003307
Voucher: 174841
174842 08/29/2003 005921
Voucher: 174842
174843 08/29/2003 005891
Voucher: 174843
174844 08/29/2003 003896
Voucher: 174844
174845 08/29/2003 006414
Voucher: 174845
174846 08/29/2003 000341
Voucher: 174846
174847 08/29/2003 002521
Voucher: 174847
174848 08/29/2003 000873
Voucher: 174848
SPARKS CAR CARE
SPEEDY AUTO & WINDOW G
11528
11552
11574
11711
011443
O11470
11729
11734
11735
11724
11749
11753
11745
11623
1052587
SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES 11025
STERICYCLE INC
00023917O2
STL SEATTLE 58012998
SUDDEN IMAGE INC
2993
SUMMIT LAW GROUP 18907
SUMNER VETERINARY HOS
SUNRISE SELF STORAGE
249927
250987
313320
SUPERLON PLASTICS INC 03F4281
TARGET STORES DIVISION, All03529324
1103534079
1103537937
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
07/23/2003
07/22/2003
07/24/20O3
08/15/2003
07/07/2003
07/11/2003
08/15/2003
08/15/2003
08/15/2003
08/15/2003
08/18/2003
08/21/2003
08/18/2003
07~30~2003
07/23/2003
PS- AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE
PS- AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE
PS- AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE
PS- AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE
PS- AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE
PS- AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE
MSFLT-AUTO REPAIR/SERV
MSFLT-AUTO REPAIR/SERV
MSFLT-AUTO REPAIR/SERV
MSFLT-AUTO REPAIR/SERV
MSFLT-AUTO REPAIR/SERV
MSFLT-AUTO REPAIR/SERV
MSFLT-AUTO REPAIR/SERV
PS- AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE
PS-WINDSHIELD REPAIR
424.69
398.88
274.06
263.30
227.36
175.17
88.74
56.28
39.37
29.75
29.75
29.75
27.20
16.32
32.64
08/10/2003 AG#00-155:CEL PK MTGTN M
1,065.72
10.96
320.00
476.10
117.50
07/31/2003 PS-WASTE DISPOSAL FEES
08/18/2003 SWM-WATER QUALITY TES
08/09/2003 PS-PHOTO SERVICES
08/15/2003 AGO 1-151: LAW SVCS-POLIC
08/02/2003
08/11/2003
08/18/2003
PS-K9 VETERINARY EXPENS
PS-VETERINARY EXPENSES:
PS-MTHLY STRGE RENTAL F
718.68
114.96
170.00
08/18/2003 SWM-PVC FLEXIBLE COUPL
139.96
08/06~003
08/10/2003
08/14~003
PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
45.66
27.42
21.43
Check Total
2,080.62
32.64
1,065.72
10.96
320.00
476.10
117.50
833.64
170.00
139.96
94.51
Page: 18
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 19
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
174852
174853
174854
174855
174856
174857
174858
174859
174849 08~9/2003 006255
Voucher: 174849
174850 08/29/2003 006834
Voucher: 174850
174851 08~9/2003 000581
Voucher: 174851
08/29/2003 005321 TOSCO/FLEET SERVICES
174860
174861
174862
174863
174864
Voucher: 174852
08~9/2003 004493
Voucher: 174853
08/29/2003 001715
Voucher: 174854
08D9/2003 005253
Voucher: 174855
08~9/2003 007629
Voucher: 174856
08/29/2003 002426
Voucher: 174857
08D9/2003 003837
Voucher: 174858
08/29/2003 005019
Voucher: 174859
08/29/2003 004470
Voucher: 174860
08/29/2003 003563
Voucher: 174861
08/29/2003 005599
Voucher: 174862
08/29/2003 001124
Voucher: 174863
08/29/2003 005704
Voucher: 174864
TEKS SERVICES, INC
TIWANA, KHUSHDER S
TOOL TOWN INC
2546
8/21/03
37006
3150410
MILE REIMB
339336
JULY/03
133405
TOUART, A PANDORA
TRUGREEN-CHEMLAWN
U S BANCORP
ULLIAN, GABRIELE
UNITED GROCERS CASH & C 40423
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 000F80F48313
UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE 34922600-001
35115512-001
35148634-001
35279157-001
US HEALTHWORKS MED GRC0021786-WA
VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS C0001403
0001404
VAUSE, GREG EMPL REIMB
VERIZON WIRELESS 1794763669
VERTICAL TRANSPORTATIO DVT0564X803
DVT05642X803
Inv Date
08/07/2003
08/21/2003
07/23/2003
08/06/2003
08/19/2003
07/31/2003
08/29/2003
08/19/2003
08/05/2003
08/02/2003
08/06/2003
08/18/2003
08/14/2003
08/19/2003
08/0t/2003
07/21/2003
07/21/2003
08/11/2003
08/06/2003
07/21/2003
07/21/2003
Description
Amount Paid
SWR-POSTAGE & MAILING O
MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE
PKM-REPLACEMENT TOOLS
PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES
PWSWR-CITY BUSINESS RE
PKDBC-LAWN TREATMENT
CITY VISA CHARGES FOR (J
PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D
PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
PRCS-DOCUMENT DELIVER
PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
SWM-EQUIPMENT RENTAL
SWM-EQUIPMENT RENTAL
SWM-REPAIPJMAINT SUPPL
SWM-CDL PHISICAL-FOX
PS-EMER DISPATCH SVCS J
PS-EMER DISPATCH SVCS J
PS-REIMB:POSTAGE:GREG ~
MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME
AG01-61:CITY HALL ELE SVC
AG00-171 :KLCC ELEV MAI NT
2,775.62
40.00
278.78
132.95
55.62
244.8O
73.78
50.00
38.88
9.52
458.83
366.33
43.72
8.16
50.00
765.00
105.00
24.47
548.71
156.47
145.68
Check Total
2,775.62
40.00
278.78
132.95
55.62
244.80
73.78
50.00
38.88
9.52
877.04
50.00
870.00
24.47
548.71
302.15
Page: 19
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 20
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
174865 08/29/2003 000294
Voucher: 174865
174866 08/29/2003 000094
Voucher: 174866
174867 08/29/2003 006638
Voucher: 174867
174868 08/29/2003 001866
Voucher: 174868
174869 08/29/2003 000340
Voucher: 174869
174870 08/29/2003 001379
Voucher: 174870
'~ 174871 08/29/2003 000253
Voucher: 174871
:1 08/29/2003 006007
74872
Voucher: 174872
174873 08/29/2003 007630
Voucher: 174873
174874 08/29/2003 007271
Voucher: 174874
174875 08/29/2003 000783
Voucher: 174875
174876 08/29/2003 007620
Voucher: 174876
174877 08/29/2003 005565
Voucher: 174877
174878 08/29/2003 003500
Voucher: 174878
174879 08~9~003 001241
Voucher: 174879
174880 08D9~003 000173
Voucher: 174880
VILMA SIGNS 274
WA STATE AUDITOR'S OFFI L46080
WA STATE DEPT OF LICENS JULY 2003
WA STATE ECOLOGY DEPAR WC03054001
WA STATE INFORMATION S
WA STATE L&I ELEVATOR S
2OO307O236
2003070234
0056525
WA STATE TRANSPORTATIO
WALKER ACE HARDWARE
WALKER, RON
ATB30812168
ATB30812132
00119971 16
00119790 17
00121430 16
133403
WASHINGTON APPRAISAL S 6031
WASTE MANAGEMENT
003067310551
WEASO
C2512R4846
WELCOME COMMUNICATIO 3010
WESCOM COMMUNICATIO
WEST COAST AWARDS
13438
13710
13711
13439
40007
WEST PUBLISHING CORPOR/804761700
Inv Date
07~3/2003
08/13/2003
07/31/2003
08/08~003
08/04/2003
08/04/2003
08/27/2003
08/12/2003
08/12/2003
08/07/2003
08/06/2003
08/15/2003
08/19/2003
08/13/2003
08/01/2003
08/19~003
08/06/2003
05/12~003
08/13~003
08/13/2003
05/12D003
07/31/2003
07/25/2003
Description
Amount Paid
PRCS-K-9 CARNIVAL BANNE
233.92
MSF-AUDIT SVCS: JULY 200
1,065.30
8.84
11,046.29
CDB - LICENSE REPORTING
AG03-127:EXOTIC PLANT CT
MSDP/RR-SERVER- SQL SE
MSTEL-SCAN SERVICE
RNWL ELEVATOR OPERATI
5,992.65
1,056.87
100.00
PWSCIP-GENERAL INSP-PA
PWSCIP-GENERAL INSP-PA
PKM-GRD:CNSTRCTN TOOL
PKM-GRD:CNSTRCTN TOOL
PKM-GRD:CNSTRCTN TOOL
PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D
282.09
70.11
12.15
9.14
7.26
500.00
MS-APPRAISAL FEE JOB~03
6,000.00
336.13
220.00
148.67
PWSWR-LITTER DISPOSAL
PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE
MSDP - NEXTEL CELLPHON
PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST
PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST
PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST
PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST
CDB - SAMPLE SHIRTS TO T
141.44
87.04
87.04
87.04
69.08
LAW-RCWA CHAP 9 - THREE
228.03
Check Total
233.92
1,065.30
8.84
11,046.29
7,O49.52
100.00
352.20
28.55
500.00
6,000.00
336.13
220.00
148.67
402.56
69.08
228.03
Page: 20
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 21
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
174881 08/29/2003 001427
Voucher: 174881
174882 08/29/2003 007631
Voucher: 174882
174883 08/29~003 002204
Voucher: 174883
174884 08/29~003 005680
Voucher: 174884
174885 08~9/2003 007239
Voucher: 174885
174886 08~9~003 000660
Voucher: 174886
174887 08/29/2003 005722
Voucher: 174887
174888 08/29/2003 000947
: Voucher: 174888
474889 08/29/2003 005545
Voucher: 174889
174890 08/29/2003 000694
Voucher: 174890
WESTERN POWER & EQUIP
WHAM, GAll
J57741
343804
J57706
133412
WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY 24-123961
WILD WEST INTERNATIONAL 2525
WINDMILL GARDENS
203-66478
WOODWORTH & COMPANY I 158387
157901
YAKIMA COUNTY DEPARTMEIJUNE 2003
YOUR INC 2974
2976
YSI INCORPORATED 460745
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE COMF68766521
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
08/04/2003
08/08/2003
08/04/2003
08/19/2003
07/28~003
07/30~003
06/30~003
08/13/2003
07/31/2003
07/02/2003
08/20~003
08/20~003
07/31~003
08/14~003
MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES
MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES
MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D
SWM-GRASS SEED AND ER
PS-FIRING RANGE FEE SVC
PWS-HANGING FLOWER BA
PWSWM-GENERAL CONTR
PWSWM-GENERAL CONTR
PS-JAIL SERVICES 6/03
AG02-48: PS/JANITORIAL SV
AG00-15C:MC JANITORIAL S
SWM-WATER QUALITY SUP
PKDBC-FIRST AID SUPPLIES
115.00
55.88
16.70
50.00
54.94
54.91
4,856.29
979.73
76.18
29,576.40
1,629.40
699.00
326.80
65.39
Sub total for us bank:
Check Total
187.58
50.00
54.94
54.91
4,856.29
1,055.91
29,576.40
2,328.40
326.80
65.39
1,294,521.43
Page:21
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 22
245 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks: 1,294,521.43
Page: 22
apChkLst
08~29~2003 10:22:05AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 23
Bank code: key
Check # Date
174677 08/29/2003
Page:23
apChkLst
09115/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: I
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor
174891 09/03/2003 007377
Voucher: 174891
174892 09/05/2003 001287
Voucher: 174892
174893 09/05/2003 001898
Voucher: 174893
174894 09/10/2003 001004
Voucher: 174894
174895 09/15/2003 000332
Voucher: 174895
174896 09/15/2003 001856
Voucher: 174896
174897 09/15/2003 000109
Voucher: 174897
174898 09/15/2003 007637
Voucher: 174898
174899 09/15/2003 000475
Voucher: 174899
174900 09/15/2003 005901
Voucher: 174900
174901 09/15/2003 001110
Voucher: 174901
174902 09/15/2003 005287
Voucher: 174902
174903 09/15/2003 003645
Voucher: 174903
174904 09/15~003 003129
Voucher: 174904
Invoice
AIR-FX 71403
CITY OF TACOMA K KRUSEY
KING COUNTY FINANCE OFF L02P0001
MAILMEDIA INC 40994
ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS I 0067181-1
0896795-1N
ACTION SERVICES CORPORa46164
ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL 13334
AKELA SECURITY SERVICE I 3097
ALARM CENTERS/CUSTOM S 295213
ALL SPORTS CLOTHING SUPIFW-080403
AMAYA ELECTRIC
AMERICALL COMMUNICATIO
AMERICAN JANITORIAL SVC
AMS LASER SUPPLY
6879-10
D6416
3004
3005
3006
344813
344811
344812
344065
261006CR
Inv Date Description
07/14/2003
09/04/2003
08/15/2003
08/27/2003
08/30/2003
08/21/2003
08/29/2003
08/18/2003
08/26/2003
08/20/2003
08/04/2003
08/25/2003
09/01/2003
09~04~2003
09/04/2003
09/04/2003
08/29/2003
08/29/2003
08/29/2003
08/12~2003
08/11/2003
PS-PAINTING OF HELMET-
PS-TUITION FEE:CYCLIST C
CDPL-NORTHLAKE ESTATE
PRCS-POSTAGE FOR ARTS
LAW-MONTHLY SRV CHRG S
LAW-MONTHLY SRV CHRG S
AG00,6C:(AUG/03)STRT SWE
PKM-FAClLITY LOCKSMITH S
MC-7/03 UNARMED SCRT G
PKRCS-9/03 ALRM MNTR SV
PRCS-DAY CAMP T-SHIRTS
AG02-138:(JULY/03)CHB ELE
SWM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT
AG00-50A:(AUG/03) DBC JNT
AG00-50A:(AUG/03) KFT JNT
AG00-50A:(AUG/03)PKM JNT
MS/PS-PRINTER TONER~
MS/PS-PRINTER TONER~
MS/PS-PRINTER TONER-
MSDP-PRINTER TONER-
MSDP-PRINTER TONER-
Amount Paid
254.12
250.00
250.00
712.50
96.00
5.00
2,961.20
143.62
2,833.25
59.74
230.59
3,778.23
139.40
4,955.63
613.20
547.50
430.79
368.67
54.40
46.78
-130.51
Check Total
254.12
250.00
250.00
712.50
101.00
2,961.20
143.62
2,833.25
59.74
230.59
3,778.23
139.40
6,116.33
770.13
Page: 1
apChkLst
09/15/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CiTY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 2
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
Inv Date Descril~tion
Amount Paid
Check Total
174905 09/15/2003 005501
Voucher: 174905
174906 09/15/2003 005715
Voucher: 174906
174907 09/15/2003 001233
Voucher: 174907
174908 09/15/2003 000075
Voucher: 174908
174909 09/15/2003 000004
Voucher: 174909
174910 09/15/2003 007647
Voucher: 174910
174911~ 09/15/2003 004128
. Voucher: 174911
~.~ 174912' 09/15/2003 001604
'Voucher: 174912
174913 09/15/2003 002386
Voucher: 174913
174914 09/15/2003 005421
Voucher: 174914
174915 09/15/2003 703199
Voucher: 174915
174916 09/15/2003 007479
Voucher: 174916
174917 09/15/2003 004158
Voucher: 174917
174918 09/15/2003 007642
Voucher: 174918
ANDREWS, AMY
ARCH WIRELESS HOLDINGS
8~6/03
9~/03
0~12/03
IM61638381
AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE 2536613748
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES I 20405718
AWC-ASSOC OF WASHINGT 10/22/03
BAEG, OK H 03-43485
BAGNELL INC 5889
BALL, GIGI Y 9/2/03
BANHEGYI/PAWLAK, SUSAN 9/2/03
9/4/03
9/5/03
BARGER, KENNETH 8/14/03
8/13/03
8/15/03
BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERI 02-47930
BARKER RINKER SEACAT 4859
BERNER, ILYA S 8/26/03
BLACKSTONE'S COLLISION I 2591-1
08/26/2003
09/02/2003
08/12/2003
09/02/2003
08/16/2003
09/02/2003
08/28/2003
08/25/2003
08/25/2003
09/02/2003
09/02/2003
09/04/2003
09/05/2003
08/14/2003
08/13/2003
08/15/2003
09/05/2003
08/07/2003
08/26/2003
07/21/2003
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
MC-INTERPRETER SVCS
MSTEL-~03/03-10/02/03PAG
MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV
MSTEL- AUG 2003 CELL AIR '1
AWC REGISTRATION FOR D
PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC
PS-PRINTING SERVICES:VIC
MC-MUNICIPAL COURT
MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE
INTERPRETER SERVICES
INTERPRETER SERVICES
INTERPRETER SERVICES
INTERPRETER SERVICES
INTERPRETER SERVICES
PW-RFND EXPR FEE:00-10
AG03-73:(JULY/03)COM CTR I
INTERPRETER SERVICES
RISK# 03-03-091-273 LST DT ~
150.00
80.00
70.00
735.47
68.16
967.45
30.00
75.00
711.62
43.75
35.00
35.00
35.00
67.50
45.00
45.00
450.49
22,927.47
100.00
1,872.86
300.00
735.47
68.16
967.45
30.00
75.00
711.62
43.75
105.00
157.50
450.49
22,927.47
100.00
1,872.86
Page: 2
apChkLst
09115/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAy
Page: 3
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
174919 09/15/2003 001630
Voucher: 174919
174920 09/15/2003 004919
Voucher: 174920
174921 09/15/2003 004315
Voucher: - 174921
174922 09/15/2003 000414
Voucher: 174922
174923 09/15/2003 000991
Voucher: 174923
174924 09/15/2003 001481
Voucher: 174924
BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO I
BRATVVEAR
BRENT'S ALIGNMENT & REP
CAFE PACIFIC CATERING IN
CASCADE COFFEE INC
CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC
313782
315245
320209
315538-01
318611
314593-02
127198
006230
7167
7171
7178
7176
7132
7175
7185
7180
7182
7181
7168
7179
7170
7169
7173
7177
7186
7154
7184
7174
20345563
30333760
3425044
Inv Date Descril~tion
Amount Paid
08/27/2003
08/28/2003
08~28~2003
08/13~2003
08/27/2003
08/13/2003
0812712003
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS-SPECIALIZED POLICE AP
616.08
316.28
244.53
183.76
108.53
99.66
121.76
08/29/2003 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
200.51
08/29~003
09/02~003
09/02~003
09/02D003
08/25~003
09/02/2003
09/02/2003
09/02~003
09/02/2003
09/02~003
09/02~003
09/02~003
09/02~003
09/02~003
09/02/2003
09/02/2003
09/02/2003
08/27~003
09/02~003
09/02~003
09/08D003
06/09~003
08/29/2003
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
CM- CATERING SERVICES F
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
DBC- CATERING SERVICES
MSM&D-MTG COFFEE SUPP
PKRLS-MTG COFFEE SUPPL
AG03-67:(7/03) S288 ST/SR99
2,677.20
1,687.16
1,380.40
1,190.00
1,046.42
684.40
627.00
442.00
440.64
407.04
376.80
367.20
286.00
273.30
220.68
137.16
131.56
124.35
91.32
73.56
120.86
72.00
19,421.67
Check Total
1,568.84
121.76
200.51
12,664.19
192.86
19,421.67
Page: 3
apChkLst
09/1512003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 4
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date VendOr
(Continued)
Invoice
174925 09/15/2003 005712
Voucher: 174925
174926 09/15/2003 007443
Voucher: 174926
174927 09/15/2003 006417
Voucher: 174927
174928 09/15/2003 000142
Voucher: 174928
174929
174930
174931
174932
09/15/2003 004412
Voucher: 174929
09/15/2003 003564
Voucher: 174930
09/15/2003 000650
Voucher: 174931
09/15/2003 003752
Voucher: 174932
174933 09/15/2003 007329
Voucher: 174933
174934 09/15/2003 007317
Voucher: 174934
CHANG, JENNY 8/30/03
CITIES INSURANCE ASSO OF 0304-022
CITY OF EVERETT
103002760
CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE CK# 2057
CK#2062
CK~2063
CK#2060
CITY OF TACOMNSURPLUS ~071-03
CLARY, JOHN 07/23/03
COASTLINE TRACTOR
WO14078
COASTVVlDE SUPPLY DBA
COMBAT SHOOTING&TACTI
T1249221
T1240883-1
T1254045
T1248057
T1251917
8/18-8~2/03
COMCAST OF WASHINGTON 849834016036
174935
174936
174937
174938
174939
09/15/2003 002935 COMMISSION ON ACCREDIT
Voucher: 174935
09/15/2003 004395 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICA
Voucher: 174936
09/15/2003 000721
Voucher: 174937
09/15/2003 000771
Voucher: 174938
09/15/2003 007541
Voucher: 174939
CORLISS RESOURCES INC
COSTCO/HRS USA
DAMARK CORPORATION
17908
0220-423636
0040422
AUG 2003
101849
Inv Date
08/30/2003
09/01/2003
O8/27/2003
08/13/2003
09/09/2003
09/09/2003
09/08/2003
08/01/2003
08/26/2003
08/22/2003
08/15/2003
08/14/2003
08/27/2003
08/13~2003
08/27/2003
07/28/2003
08/27/2003
08/21/2003
08/11/2003
08/25/2003
08/26/2003
08/28/2003
Description
Amount Paid Check Total
INTERPRETER SERVICES
CITY INS PREM-AUTO
PS-SURVIVAL SPANISH:LAW
PS-TRVL EXP:EFF MD PRCT~
MSHR-TRVL EXP:WAPELRA (
MSF-TRVL EXP:WAPELRA (
CD-TRVL EXP:WA COUNTY (
PS-VEH REPAIRS (JULY/20
PS-REIMB:PURCHASE OF K9
MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~
PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~
PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLI
PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE
PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLI
PS- SRT HOSTAGE TRAININ
MSGAC- 9/6/03-10/05/03COM
PS- CALEA CONFERENCE F
PKMCHB-LIGHTING SUPPLI
SWMClP-CONCRETE SUPPL
MSF-(AUG/2003)SUPPLIES
PD VIDEO SERV--320TH FIB
35.00 35.00
308,334.00 308,334.00
150.00 150.00
767.16
146.82
48.00
44.00 1,005.98
1,777.69 1,777.69
108.71 108.71
350.00 350.00
188.71
173.56
163.00
145.31
137.58 808.16
8,000.00 8,000.00
81.59 81.59
400.00 400.00
150.27 150.27
98.61 98.61
941.23 941.23
1,944.26 1,944.26
Page:4
apChkLst
09/15/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 5
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
174940 09/15/2003 000939
Voucher: 174940
174941 09/15/2003 003472
Voucher: 174941
174942 09/15/2003 000438
Voucher: 174942
174943 09/15/2003 701001
Voucher: 174943
174944 09/15/2003 005341
Voucher: 174944
174945 09/15/2003 007648
Voucher: 174945
174946 09/15/2003 005842
Voucher: 174946
174947 09/15/2003 007612
Voucher: 174947
174948 09/15/2003 000570
Voucher: 174948
174949 09/15D003 007649
Voucher: 174949
174950 09/15~003 002887
Voucher: 174950
DANONE WATERS OF NORT
DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS I
DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE J
DIOCESE OF OLYMPIA
DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA
DOYLE, JESSICA E
DPK INC
DRAKE, WILLIAM E
EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE
EAGLESON, HEATHER M
EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES
5276423-15
5445172-15
5276319-15
5277086-15
123555
3763
3759
C2206R4864
8/26/03
9/2/03
8/27/03
03-43383
7/29/03
(1028873
1028639
1028670
1028883
1028638
1028543
1029027
1028853
1028635
1028653
1028709
03-43594
90609318
07/31/2003
08/12/2003
07/31/2003
07/31/2003
08/28/2003
09/02/2003
08/28/2003
09/03/2003
08/26~003
09/02~003
08/27~003
08/18/2003
08D9/2003
07D9/2003
08~23~2003
08/14/2003
08/15/2003
08/25/2003
08/14/2003
08/11/2003
08/30/2003
08/23/2003
08/14/2003
08/15/2003
08/18/2003
09/05/2003
08/15~2003
PKRLS-WTR/CLR RNTL ACC
PRLSKJP - WATER SERVICE
PKKFT-WTR/CL RNTL ACCT#
PKRCS-WTR/CL RNTL ACCT
PS-RADIO REPAIR #814
LUNCH MTG WITH STAFF O
MC-CLERK INTERVIEW PAN
PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE
INTERPRETER SERVICES
INTERPRETER SERVICES
INTERPRETER SERVICES
PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO(
AG03-101:(8/03) PAC HWY H
PS-REIMB:UNIFORM BOOT A
MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/SER
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SERVIC
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SERVIC
MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/SER
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SERVIC
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SERVIC
MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/SER
MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/SER
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SERVIC
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SERVIC
PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SERVIC
PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO(
MSDP-VIRUSSCAN V7.0 SOF
65.93
31.70
31.33
24.15
49.97
32.02
18.47
75.00
180.00
100.00
80.00
75.00
94,839.96
100.00
467.76
456.65
258.53
228.50
163.80
82.79
66.37
27.19
22.84
18.49
18.49
100.00
57.44
153.11
49.97
50.49
75.00
360.00
75.00
94,839.96
100.00
1,811.41
100.00
57.44
Page: 5
apChkLst
09115/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 6
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
174951 09/15/2003 000730'
Voucher: 174951
174952 09/15/2003 001046
Voucher: 174952
174953 09/15/2003 000328
Voucher: 174953
174954 09/15/2003 001297
Voucher: 174954
174955 09/15/2003 004704
Voucher: 174955
174956 09/15/2003 000217
Voucher: 174956
174957 09/15/2003 002644
Voucher: 174957
174958 09/15/2003 000229
Voucher: 174958
174959 09/15/2003 000220
Voucher: 174959
174960 09/15/2003 000285
Voucher: 174960
174961 09/15/2003 004270
Voucher: 174961
174962 09/15/2003 001893
Voucher: 174962
174963 09/15/2003 004910
Voucher: 174963
174964 09/15/2003 003802
Voucher: 174964
174965 09/15/2003 001686
Voucher: 174965
ENTRANCO INC 42499
EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMAT17117628
ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA)
FACILITY MAINTENANCE CO
0140214
0140213
138-005
FARR, CHERYL J GRAUE
MU
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPOR4-799-80493
4-846-61719
FEDERAL WAY BOYS & GIRL 2QTR/2003
FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER CO2417
FEDERAL WAY EXECUTEL
FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPART
DONGHAE DIN
DONGHAE
03-0215
FEDERAL WAY MIRROR
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DIS
004959
004951
O04926
004897
004848
004875
SIF-AUG 2003
FILETEX LLC 03-1121
03-1137
FINAL TOUCH FINISHING SC1-134
FIRST CHOICE BUSINESS MA00080605
Inv Date
01/29/2003
08/25/2003
08/31/2003
08/31/2003
08/15/2003
08/08/2003
08/19/2003
08/01D003
08/18~003
07/03/2003
08/26~003
08/20/2003
08/20/2003
08/31/2003
08/23/2003
08/21/2003
08/02/2003
07/19/2003
06/21/2003
07~05~2003
09/10/2003
08/05/2003
08/22/2003
08/18/2003
08/30/2003
Description
Amount Paid
AG01-48A:(12/02) 23RD S RD
2,266.66
20.17
PS-AUG 2003 CREDIT REPOF
PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES (8/
MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLES
AG01-52A:(AUG/03)DBC LAN
6,619.97
2,612.26
1,237.61
LAW-TRAN SC RI P-CITY/G RA
LAW-TRANSCRI P-CITY/G RA
LAW-DOCUMENTS EXP DEL
CDB - DOCUMENTS EXPRES
AG03-120:2 QTPJ2003 OPER~
700.00
87.50
15.60
13.20
2,500.00
750.00
CM-ADVERTISEMENT IN CH/~
CM-DONGHAE DINNER VISIT
CM-DONGHAE DINNER BEV
PKRCS-REMIT FIRE DEPT F
850.63
164.97
80.00
CDPL-LEGALS~
CDPL-LEGALS~
CD-HS CDBG PUBLIC NOTIC
MSC-ORDINANCE ADVERTIS
MSC-ORDI NANCE ADVERTIS
MSC-ORDINANCE ADVERTIS
MSF-(AUG/03) SCHL IMPACT
130.14
102.92
70.38
59.76
43.16
36.52
36,140.00
CDA - END TAB FOLDERS A
CDA - COLORCODED LASERI
PKRCS-YNG LADIES&GEN T
115.00
49.55
80.00
MSHR-8/28-11/28/03 COPIER I
471.97
Check Total
2,266.66
20.17
9,232.23
1,237.61
787.50
28.80
2,500.00
75O.O0
1,015.60
80.00
442.88
36,140.00
164.55
80.00
471.97
Page: 6
apChkLst
09/15/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 7
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
174966 09/15/2003 002664
Voucher: 174966
174967 09/15/2003 007614
Voucher: 174967
174968 09/15/2003 001669
Voucher: 174968
174969 09/15/2003 007543
Voucher: 174969
174970 09/15/2003 007404
Voucher: 174970
174971 09/15/2003 004566
Voucher: 174971
174972 09/15/2003 002574
Voucher: 174972
'~174973 09/15/2003 002547
Voucher: 174973
174974 09/15/2003 003831
Voucher: 174974
174975 09/15/2003 000671
Voucher: 174975
174976 09/15/2003 003841
Voucher: 174976
174977 09/15/2003 001487
Voucher: 174977
174978 09/15/2003 005378
Voucher: 174978
174979 09/15/2003 002477
Voucher: 174979
174980 09/15/2003 000367
Voucher: 174980
174981 09/15/2003 000016
Voucher: 174981
174982 09/15/2003 001548
Voucher: 174982
FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC 50193
FLORES, STACY EMPL REIMB
FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELM753590
FRANK COLUCCIO CONTRUC1
FULLER, MICHELLE M 8/26/03
8/13/03
G&M HONEST PERFORMANC 55558
55824
GRAHAM & DUNN, P.C.
GRAINGER INC
GSR POLYGRAPH SERVICES
H D FOWLER COMPANY
HEAD-QUARTERS PTS
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPA
HOFFMAN, GINA
HOME DEPOT-DEPT 32-250
205952
205972
753-536451-2
03-018
1135O52O
7729
34414905
34476026
EMPL REIMB
9031354
IIMC-INT'L INST OF MUN CLEFS COURTNEY
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 16431246
IMAGE MASTERS INC 84679
08/26/2003
08/27/2003
08/27/2003
07/31/2003
08/26/2003
08/13/2003
08~25~2003
08~30~2003
08/1912003
08/19/2003
08/12/2003
08/31/2003
08~26~2003
09/01/2003
08/16/2003
08/28/2003
08/04/2003
08/26/2003
09/10/2003
09/02/2003
08/15~2003
MSHR-FLEX PLAN ADM SVC
PS-REIMB:EMPL TRVL EXP P
AG02-95A:(JULY-AUG 27) LE
AG03-70:(7/03)S 288~SR99 S
INTERPRETER SERVICES
INTERPRETER SERVICES
MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES
MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES
AG99-143:(AUG/03)LGL SVC
AG99-143:(7/03)LGL SVCS (
PRCS-MOTOR, I/3HP, GENEF
PS-POLYGRAPH EXAMS
PKM-GD REPAIR/MAINT SUP
AG01-109A:PKM SANITATIO
MSDP/RR HP COMPAQ D530
MSDP/PW-RR HP COMPAQ N
MC-AIRFARE WA DC CONFEf
SWM-REPAI R/MAINTENANC
MSC-APPL FEE CERT MUNI C
MSMD-COPIES MAINT (7/5
CM-PLAQUE TO COMMEMOR
292.10
98.52
1,278.00
140,041.29
100.00
60.00
48.35
23.98
598.86
24.25
158.30
375.00
48.78
386.50
19,377.28
1,200.06
470.00
22.75
135.00
1,756.06
62.56
292.1-0
98.52
1,278.00
140,041.29
160.00
72.33
623.11
158.30
375.00
48.78
386.50
20,577.34
470.00
22.75
135.00
1,756.06
62.56
Page: 7
apChkLst
09/15/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 8
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued}
Invoice
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
174983 09/15/2003 002137
Voucher: 174983
174984 09/15/2003 005691
Voucher: 174984
174985 09/15/2003 001240
Voucher: 174985
174986 09/15/2003 005231
Voucher: 174986
174987 09/15/2003 005025
Voucher: 174987
174988 09/15/2003 005934
Voucher: 174988
174989 09/15/2003 004639
Voucher: 174989
174990 09/15/2003 001259
Voucher: 174990
174991 09/15/2003 000564
Voucher: 174991
174992 09/15/2003 003898
Voucher: 174992
174993 09/15/2003 000201
Voucher: 174993
INLAND FOUNDRY SALES, IN 0755
INLAND PACIFIC STAMPS & 0472472
INRO CONSULTANTS INC 16286
lOS CAPITAL INC 5972363
J&R COMMERCIAL JNTR SVC
K P TRANSLATION SERVICE
KING 5 TELEVISION
1044
1045
1047
1046
8/19/03
8/26/03
KENT PRESSE
KING COUNTY CRIME VICTIM AUG 2003
KING COUNTY PET LICENSE AUG 2003
KING COUNTY RADIO
KINKO'S INC, ACCOUNT #020
302723
38704
40073
40082
40154
40134
4O088
515100069479
515100069387
515100069516
515100069509
515100069510
515100069499
515100069382
08/06/2003
08/26/2003
09/02/2003
08/28/2003
09/01/2003
09/01/2003
09/01/2003
09/01/2003
08/19/2003
08/26/2003
08/02/2003
09/08/2003
09/08/2003
08/31/2003
08/26/2003
08/26/2003
O8/26/20O3
08/26/2003
08/26/2003
O8/26/20O3
08/28/2003
08/21/2003
09/01/2003
08/29/2003
08/29/2003
08/29/2003
08/20/2003
SWM-VANED GRATE
CDB - REPLACEMENT STAM
PVVTR-INRO COURSE SARA
MSMD-COPIER RENTAL
agoo-51c:(aug/03) CHB JAN
AG00-14C:(AUG/03) KLCC JN
AG03-22:(AUG/03)MAINT OF
AG03-22:(AUG/03)STEEL LK ,
TRANSLATION SERVICES
TRANSLATION SERVICES
PS-KENT PRESSER NEWS V
MSF- AUG 2003 REMIT CRIM
MSF- AUG 03 KC PET FEES R
MSDP-RADIO SERVICES
MSDP-RADIO SERVICES
MSDP-RADIO SERVICES
MSDP-RADIO SERVICES
MSDP-RADIO SERVICES
MSDP-RADIO SERVICES
MSDP-RADIO SERVICES
PS-PRINTING SERVICES
CDA-PRINTING SERVICES
PS-PRINTING SERVICES
PS-PRINTING SERVICES
PWA-PRINTING SERVICES~
PS-PRINTING SERVICES
PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS~
948.74
101.24
435.OO
2,721.75
1,797.00
915.00
375.OO
333.33
184.50
144.52
40.00
975.88
512.00
4,485.00
176.46
44.50
44.50
44.50
39.16
2.38
544.0O
403.10
223.69
120.22
85.10
10.88
4.35
948.74
101.24
435.00
2,7~1.75
3,420.33
329~02
40.00
975.88
512.00
4,836.50
1,391.34
Page: 8
apChkLst
0911512003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 9
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
Inv Date Descril~tion
Amount Paid
Check Total
174994 09/15/2003 000201
Voucher: 174994
174995 09/15/2003 007643
Voucher: 174995
174996 09/15/2003 007636
Voucher: 174996
174997 09/15/2003 001456
Voucher: 174997
174998 09/15/2003 003399
Voucher: 174998
174999 09/15/2003 005322
Voucher: 174999
175000 09/15/2003 000096
Voucher: 175000
175001 09/15/2003 007557
Voucher: 175001
175002 09/15/2003 007545
Voucher: 175002
175003 09/15/2003 004052
Voucher: 175003
175004 09/15/2003 005668
Voucher: 175004
KINKO'S INC, ACCOUNT #020
KIT CESSNA
KRUSEY, TIFFANY
KUSTOM SIGNALS INC
KVASNYUK, NIKOLAY
LA QUINTA INN & SUITES
LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRI
LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIA
LANE POWELL SPEARS LUB
LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIP
LAW OFFICES OF DESMOND
515100069389
SRT SNIPER
MILEGAGE REI
169647
8/20/03
O2820O01576
822402
899802
2814401
835902
3033601
2049903
460602
888103
824102
888002
3088801
101
896402
3278301
02..43481
3261713
09020305
08230306
08250306
AUG 2003
08/21/2003
08/22~003
09/02/2003
08/25/2003
08~0/2003
08/12~003
08/19/2003
08/19/2003
08/19~2003
08/19~2003
08/21/2003
08/14/2003
08/14/2003
08/19~2003
08/19~2003
08/19/2003
08/19~2003
08/19/2003
08/19/2003
08/14/2003
09~05~2003
08/14/2003
08~5/2003
08/15~003
08/25~003
08/29/2003
PS-MAHER MEMORIAL ALBU
PS-SRT SNIPER COURSE
PS-MILEAGE REIMBURSEMEI
PS-TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT/SUI
DISTRICT COURT INTERPRE'
PS-MAHER FUR EXP:LODGI
PKM-UTLITY CHARGES
PKM-UTLITY CHARGES
PKM-UTLITY CHARGES
PRCKJP- UTLITIES
PKM-UTLITY CHARGES
PKM-UTLITY CHARGES
PKM-UTLITY CHARGES
PKM-UTLITY CHARGES
PKM-UTLITY CHARGES
PKM-UTLITY CHARGES
PKM-UTLITY CHARGES
PKM-UTLITY CHARGES
PKM-UTLITY CHARGES
PWS-WATER SVCS~
PW-RFD EXPR FEE:#00-10
AG03-142:(JULY/03)PSA CNT
PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT
PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT
PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT
AG01-62B:(8/03)PUBLIC DEF
10.18
3,000.00
110.27
162.32
40.00
5,507.16
3,417.72
2,852.78
2,708.61
884.40
556.48
473.26
357.28
163.44
149.90
140.80
45.00
32.30
17.80
14.48
1,243.10
1,815.00
881.28
204.44
134.64
1,200.00
10.18
3,000.00
110.27
162.32
4O.0O
5,507.16
11,814.25
1,243.10
1,815.00
1,220.36
1,200.00
Page: 9
apChkLst
0911512003
Bank:
Check #
175005
175006
175007
175008
175O09
175O1O
175011
175012
175013
11:19:19AM
key us bank
Date Vendor
(Continued)
09/15/2003 004934
Voucher: 175005
09/15/2003 007641
Voucher: 175006
09/15/2003 000630
Voucher: 175007
09/15/2003 007650
Voucher: 175008
09/15/2003 005339
Voucher: 175009
LAYMAN, SANDRA
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANC
LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC
LOCKETT, SHARON
LOWE'S HIW INC
09/15/2003 000874
Voucher: 175010
09/15/2003 005043
Voucher: 175011
09/15~003 001004
Voucher: 175012
09/15D003 004094
Voucher: 175013
MACHINERY COMPONENTS I
MACHINERY POWER & EQU
MAILMEDIA INC
MATHESON, DEREK
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Invoice
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
8/28/03
001924276-02
66525
66472
O3-43368
002421193866
002421193850
002422694572
002422694575
002423194782
002423294821
002422694576
002423694976
002421093797
002422694544
002423094742
002422094240
002422594508
002423194774
002421093788
002421293896
002423194781
002421293916
113021
112748
G0255701
40547
8/22/03
8/27/03
08/28/2003 DISTRICT COURT INTERPRE'
11/07/2001 RISK:CLAIM#LA684-00192427
08/26~003
08/18D003
08/18D003
SWM-CLASS A ROCK
SWM-CLASS A ROCK
PS-REFUND TI:;~FFIC SCHO(
07/30/2003 JULY-AUG:
07/30/2003 JULY-AUG:
08/14/2003 J U LY-AUG:
08/14/2003 JULY-AUG:
08/19/2003 JULY-AUG:
08/20/2003 JULY-AUG:
08/14/2003 JULY-AUG:
08/24/2003 JULY-AUG:
07/29/2003 JULY-AUG:
08/14/2003 JULY-AUG:
08/18/2003 JULY-AUG:
08/08/2003 JULY-AUG:
08/13/2003 JULY-AUG:
08/19/2003 JULY-AUG:
07/29/2003 JULY-AUG:
07/31/2003 JULY-AUG:
08/19/2003 JULY-AUG:
07/31/2003
08/22/2003
08/13/2003
08/12/2003
REPAIR SUPPLIE
REPAIR SUPPLIE
REPAIR SUPPLIE
REPAIR SUPPLIE
REPAIR SUPPLIE
REPAIR SUPPLIE
REPAIR SUPPLIE
REPAIR SUPPLIE
REPAIR SUPPLIE
REPAIR SUPPLIE
REPAIR SUPPLIE
REPAIR SUPPLIE
REPAIR SUPPLIE
REPAIR SUPPLIE
REPAIR SUPPLIE
REPAIR SUPPLIE
REPAIR SUPPLIE
JULY-AUG: REPAIR SUPPLIE
PKM-GROOMER DRIVER PU
MSFLT-RANSOME MOWER R
PKM-EQUIPMENT RENTAL
08/08/2003 PRCS-RECREATION BROCH[
08/22/2003 CM-LODGING FOR ANNUAL
08/27/2003 CM-LUNCH DEBRIEFING MEE
92.76
2,924.00
69.63
43.52
100.00
214.14
102.32
44.54
38.94
34.55
32.48
25.85
24.86
20.67
19.55
14.01
6.40
5.40
4.73
4.29
2.48
-34.69
-53.92
93.05
27.61
368.12
1,088.38
311.18
53.31
Page: 10
Check Total
92.76
2,924.00
113.15
100.00
506.60
120.66
368.12
1,088.38
364.49
Page: 10
apChkLst
0911512003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 11
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
175014 09/15/2003 000960
Voucher: 175014
175015 09/15/2003 005406
175016
175017
175018
175019
175020
-1'175o21
Voucher: 175015
09/15/2003 001234
Voucher: 175016
09/15/2003 006008
Voucher: 175017
09/15/2003 007651
Voucher: 175018
09/15/2003 000977
Voucher: 175019
09/15/2003 000286
Voucher: 175020
09/15/2003 005470
Voucher: 175021
175022 09/15/2003 003170
Voucher: 175022
175023 09/15/2003 005160
Voucher: 175023
175024 09/15/2003 005305
Voucher: 175024
175025 09/15/2003 001902
Voucher: 175025
175026 09/15/2003 001052
Voucher: 175026
175027 09/15/2003 003922
Voucher: 175027
175028 09/15/2003 004445
Voucher: 175028
175029 09/15/2003 005561
Voucher: 175029
175030 09/15/2003 007608
Voucher: 175030
MATTHEW BENDER & COMP 6810359X
MAYBERRY, MITCHEL 6 ~ 8/2003
MCCARTHY CAUSSEAUX RO 9025-00M-134
MCLOUGHLIN & EARDLEY C 0010616-1N
MEADOWS, AMANDA L 03-43451
MEASUREMENT RESEARCH (814003
METROCALL WIRELESS INC
MIRAI ASSOCIATES
00879676
12
11
13
36856
MODERN SECURITY SYSTE
MOSELEY, DAVID
MT ELECTRIC INC 2
MYERS MASTER LAWN CAR 623
622
NAPA AUTOpARTS 713898
713466
NATIONAL BAG COMPANY I 5707286
NATIONAL SAFETY INC
NATIONAL TACTICAL OFFIC
NELSON TOOL & EQUIPMEN 2525
MILEAGE REIM
0120110-1N
TACTICAL OPE
Inv Date
08/19/2003
08/28/2003
08/31/2003
05/07/2003
08/25/2003
08/14/2003
09/01/2003
07/01/2003
06/03/2003
08/04/2003
08/25/2003
08/24/2003
08/25/2003
08/29/2003
08~29~2003
08/20/2003
08/18/2003
08/26/2003
08/26/2003
08~26~2003
08/20/2003
Description
Amount Paid
MC-LAW RESOURCE PUBLI
AG03-28:(6-8/2003)MARTIAL ,~
AG96-148B:(AUG/03)HEARIN
PS-EQUIPMENT/SUPPLIES:T
PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO(:
AG03-1:2003 MANUAL PVMN
MSTEL-9/03 PAGER SVC
AG01-118B:(JUN/03)TRFFC I
AG01-118B:(MAY/03)TRFFC I
AG01-118B:(JUL/03)TRFFC I
PKM-8/03 ALARM MONITORIh
MILEAGE REIMB TO DAVID M
AG03-102:8TH & S 312TH ST ~
AG01-66A:(AUG/03)LNDSCP r~
AG01-66A:(AUG/03)LN DSCP I~
MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES
MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PS- EVIDENCE SUPPLIES~
PKM-SAFETY EQUIPMENT/E
PS-MEMBERSHIP/TRAINING ~
PWS-AIR HOSE (50 FEET); I
95.02
2,331.42
885.00
42.00
75.00
19,540.00
3.52
5,721.38
3,063.83
1,563.99
34.82
516.96
74,947.75
1,849.52
268.01
42.15
4.32
989.54
242.37
525.00
217.60
Check Total
95.02
2,331.42
885.00
42.00
75.00
19,540.00
3.52
10,349.20
34.82
516.96
74,947.75
2,117.53
46.47
989.54
242.37
525.00
217.60
Page: 11
apChkLst
09/15/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 12
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
Check Ct Date Vendor Invoice
Inv Date Descri;)tion
Amount Paid
Check Total
175031 09/15/2003 001018 NELSON TRUCK EQUIPMENT32710
Voucher: 175031
08/25/2003 MSFLT-REPAIPJMAINT SUPP
1,389.38
1,389.38
Page: 12
apChkLst
09/15/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 13
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
Inv Date Descril~tion
Amount Paid
Check Total
175033 09/15/2003 000043
Voucher: 175033
NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE
156783
158918
158453
159213
158427
158919
158529
157828
157812
158142
158701
158017
159036
158058
158369
158375
159098
158411
158367
157988
158033
158568
159395
159041
159355
158853
158181
159455
158092
158902
159385
158895
158715
158626
158897
07/01/2003
08/15~2003
08/06/2003
08/21/2003
08/05/2003
08/1512003
08/07/2003
07~24~2003
07~23~2003
07/30/2003
08/11/2003
07~28~2003
08/1912003
07/29/2003
08/04/2003
08/04/2003
08/20/2003
08~05~2003
08/04/2003
07/28/2003
07/29/2003
08~08~2003
08/25/2003
08/19~2003
08/25/2003
08/14/2003
07/31/2003
08/26/2003
07/30/2003
08/15/2003
08/25/2003
08/15/2003
08/12/2003
08/09/2003
08/15/2003
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWS-MAINT TOOL/SUPPLIE
PWS-MAINT TOOL/SUPPLIE
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PRKJP- SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKRLS-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWS-MAINT TOOL/SUPPLIE
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
241.07
104.63
82.79
71.39
67.02
62.91
62.65
59.68
49.33
48.95
39.41
39.16
38.53
38.40
31.86
29.18
27.56
26.75
26.21
23.67
15.86
14.68
13.69
13.59
11.25
8.58
7.76
7.56
7.33
7.22
7.13
6.45
4.69
4.20
3.32
Page:13
apChkLst
09/15/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: t4
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued}
Invoice
175034 09/15/2003 000089
Voucher: 175034
175035
175036
~175037
~175038
175039
09/15/2003 006001
Voucher: 175035
09/15/2003 007652
Voucher: 175036
09/15/2003 001391
Voucher: 175037
0911512003 003529
Voucher: 175038
09/15/2003 003371
Voucher: 175039
175040
175041
175042
175043
175044
09/15/2003 002623
Voucher: 175040
09/1~2003 000504
Voucher: 175041
09/15/2003 000112
Voucher: 175042
09/15/2003 004004
Voucher: 175043
09/15/2003 000315
Voucher: 175044
NEWS TRIBUNE
NOBLE, LINDA
NOH, DAVID Y
NORTH COAST ELECTRIC C
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SE
OFFICE TEAM
OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN
ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER
PACIFIC COAST FORD INC
PACIFIC COAST FORD INC
PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE
158794
158586
158160
158412
158900
S1113420900
Sl113418100
Sl113418700
Sl113420100
420708
8~5/03
0343565
087240101
85402-001
84865-001
09736114
09773717
09699273
09647642
3516J215
2487J230
024251
FOCS94614
AUG 2003
~544411
54412
543467
544413
Inv Date Descril~tion
Amount Paid
08/13/2003
08~08~2003
07/3112003
08/05/2003
08/15/2003
09/10~2003
07/06/2003
07/13/2003
07/27/2003
08/10/2003
08/25/2003
PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
PWSWM-REPAIR SUPPLIES
MSHR-JOB AD (8/3)~
MSHR-JOB AD (7/6)~
MSHR-JOB AD (7/13)-
MSHR-JOB AD (7/27)-
PS-9/12/03-12/12/03 NEWSPA
INTERPRETER SERVICES
1.61
1.56
1.52
1.07
1.03
553.40
545.40
545.40
545.40
34.50
75.55
09/03/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO(
75.00
08/12/2003 PKRLS-ELECTRICAL SU PP LI
34.25
08~9/2003
08/28/2003
08/19/2003
08~7~003
08/12/2003
08~04~2003
08/03D003
08/18/2003
07/11~003
PS- PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHY,<
PS- PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHY,~
LAW-TEMP HELP K FORMS 8
LAW-TEMP HELP K FORMS 8
LAW-TEMP OFFICE HELP-L
CDA - TEMPORARY CLERICA
PKPL-OFFICE SUPPLIES
PKMT-OFFICE SUPPLIES
SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
140.00
140.00
1,062.00
1,062.00
849.60
709.92
115.33
11.12
261.08
08/25/2003 PS-VEHICLE REPAIRS/MAIN
118.48
08/01/2003 SIU-(AUG/03)POLICE VEH LE
1,017.80
08/19/2003 SWMCIP-TITLE REPORTS; P
08/13/2003 SWMCIP-TITLE REPORTS; P
08/13/2003 PK/PL: TITLE REPORT HYLEE
08/15/2003 SWMCIP-TITLE REPORTS; P
380.80
380.80
380.80
359.04
Check Total
1,311.25
2,224.10
75.55
75.00
34.25
280.00
3,683.52
126.45
261.08
118.48
1,017.80
1,501.44
Page: 14
apChkLst
09115/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 15
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
175045 09/15/2003 001814
Voucher: 175045
175046 09/15/2003 007653
Voucher: 175046
175047 09/15/2003 001189
Voucher: 175047
175048 09/15/2003 001166
Voucher: 175048
175049 09/15/2003 007470
Voucher: 175049
175050 09/15/2003 002557
Voucher: 175050
?175051 09/15/2003 002822
Voucher: 175051
175052 09/15/2003 006241
Voucher: 175052
175053 09/15/2003 002024
Voucher: 175053
175054 09/15/2003 003537
Voucher: 175054
175055 09/15/2003 005941
Voucher: 175055
175056 09/15/2003 001411
Voucher: 175056
175057 09/15/2003 005583
Voucher: 175057
175058 09/15/2003 000049
Voucher: 175058
PARAMETRIX INC
PECHENYUK, ROMAN
PETTY CASH- CM OFFICE
PETTY CASH - KLAHANEE
PETTY CASH - MGMT. SVC.
03-43536
03-43611
CM 9/4/03
KLCC 9/4/03
017698
PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS M PKM 8/28/03
PETTY CASH-DUMAS BAY CE DBC 9/3/03
PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT PS 9/2/03
PETTY CASH-WITNESS FEES 9/8/03
PIERCE COUNTY SECURITY 1085365
PIONEER MANUFACTURING (INV152256
INV151223
POSTAL EXPRESS INC BM2307003
BM2307023
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 229214
PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LL 595879
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
09/02/2003 AG02-113A:(AUG/03)I 3 AVE S
09/03/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO(
09/04/2003 RECORDING FEES ON SUE t-
09/04/2003 PRCS-FILM DEVELOPING FO
09/08/2003 MSHR-PARKING FAITH-SE
08/28/2003 PKM-PETTY CASH FUND RE
09/03/2003 PKDBC-TIDE BOOK:GUEST I
09/02/2003 PS-COAST GUARD PIPE:MA
09/08/2003 MSF-REIM WITNESS FUND P
08/05/2003 PRCS-SECURITY FOR RW&B
08/22/2003 PKM-FIELD MARKING PAINT
08/15/2003 PKM-FIELD MARKING PAINT
06/30/2003 CITY MAIL PROCESSING/COt
08/07/2003 CITY MAIL PROCESSING/COt
08/20/2003 PKM-WELDING SUPPLIES
08/20/2003 AG02-137:(JULY/03)CLS ACT
7,365.46
75.00
206.32
209.60
164.13
78.52
117.70
203.53
162.90
585.75
1,494.00
83.00
5,255.09
4,873.30
15.27
3,919.35
Check Total
7,365.46
75.00
206.32
209.60
164.13
78.52
117.70
203.53
162.90
585.75
1,577.00
10,128.39
15.27
3,919.35
Page: 15
apChkLst
09115/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
page: 16
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
175060 09/15/2003 000051
Voucher: 175060
PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC
131-066-1002
345-200-2003
519-842-1009
504-228-1005
439-922-1003
727-469-1000
411-836-4779
398-842-1008
980-132-1002
250-275-5917
128-255-2015
888-389-1007
004-919-1000
669-650-2001
483-657-3297
128-255-3948
536-673-1007
458-148-1001
487-650-2008
625-940-2003
141-467-1006
112-722-1008
250-275-0389
993-440-2000
330-694-9979
190-977-0008
604-130-2008
225-650-2002
895-405-1002
925-940-2007
652-017-1007
996-289-0001
373-087-1005
720-429-1004
525-940-2005
Inv Date Descri~)tion
Amount Paid
07/31/2003
08/15/2003
08/18/2003
08/18/2003
08/20/2003
08/19/2O03
08/20/2003
08/18/2003
08/19/2003
08/15/2003
08/19/2003
08/18/2003
08/18/2003
08/15/2003
08/19/2003
08/18/2003
07/31/2003
08/15/2003
08/15/2003
08/20/2003
08/15~2003
08/15/2003
08/18/2003
08/19/2003
08/15/2003
08/19/2003
08/15/2003
08/18/2003
08/20/2003
08/14/2003
08/20/2003
08/20/2003
08/15/2003
08/18/2003
08/14~2003
PVVTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PKM- UTILITY CHARGES
PKM- UTILITY CHARGES
PKM- UTILITY CHARGES
PKM- UTILITY CHARGES
PKDBC/KFT-7/18o8/18/03 ELE
PVVTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PKM- UTILITY CHARGES
PKMo UTILITY CHARGES
Pw'rR-UTILITY CHARGES
PVVTR-UTI LITY CHARGES
MC-7/17/03-8/15/03 ELECTRIC
PVVTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PVVTR-UTILITY
PWTR-UTILITY
PVVTR-UTILITY
PVVTR-UTI LITY
PWTR-UTILITY
PWTR-UTILITY
PVVTR-UTILITY
PWTR-UTILITY
PWTR-UTILITY
PVVTR-UTILITY
PVVTR-UTI LITY
PVVTR-UTILITY
PWTR-UTILITY
PVVTR-UTILITY
PVVTR-UTILITY
PWTR-UTILITY
PVVTR-UTILITY
PVVTR-UTILITY
PVVTR-UTILITY
PVVTR-UTILITY
PVVTR-UTILITY
PVVTR-UTILITY
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
CHARGES
11,913.38
3,995.39
3,337.85
1,634.82
1,632.31
1,581.21
1,135.88
775.66
691.73
413.02
373.31
343.93
311.11
307.30
269.66
247.83
246.60
222.86
214.40
203.08
193.87
173.38
171.65
169.07
163.63
152.10
151.26
148.63
140.86
124.67
124.61
123.37
122.49
118.24
117.46
Check Total
Page: 16
apChkLst
09/15/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 17
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
Inv Date Descri~)tion
Amount Paid
Check Total
497-198-1008
753-129-1008
420-530-2005
100-093-8728
733-930-2007
733-829-1003
904-388-1003
638-448-1005
183-469-1006
472-400-1005
128-255-9812
738-448-1003
233-930-2008
736-169-1004
177-437-1007
062-691-1002
504-368-1005
786-203-1007
886-203-1005
252-150-2001
889-288-1007
917-259-1001
755-430-2005
156-140-4276
352-691-1007
442-691-1006
359-540-2003
250-275-4910
017-470-5400
657-289-0009
303-218-1004
954-567-1001
699-699-1003
121-220-2004
221-220-2002
08/15/2003
08/19/2003
08/15/2003
08/18/2003
08/14/2003
08/14/2003
08/15/2003
07~1/2003
08/18/2003
08~0/2003
08/19/2003
07/31/2003
08/14/2003
08/19/2003
08/18/2003
08/15/2003
08/15/2003
08~0/2003
08/14/2003
08/18/2003
08~0/2003
08/18/2003
08/14/2003
08/18/2003
07/31/2003
07/31/2003
08/15/2003
08/19/2003
08/18/2003
08/18/2003
08/18/2003
08/19/2003
08/19/2003
08~0/2003
08/20/2003
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWT-7/15-8/13/03 ELECTRICI
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PKM- UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PKM~ UTILITY CHARGES
PKM~ UTILITY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILtTY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILiTY CHARGES
PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES
103.39
103.39
99.97
98.41
96.33
90.95
86.43
83.62
75.83
74.06
69.34
62.71
58.16
56.74
50.38
49.59
44.37
44.02
40.63
38.51
36.94
36.88
36.30
30.59
27.40
27.40
24.94
22.23
11.80
6.34
5.84
5.84
5.84
5.84
5.84
Page: 17
apChkLst
09/15/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 18
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
17506109/15/2003 000990
Voucher: 175061
175062 09/15/2003 006394
Voucher: 175062
175063 09/15/2003 000202
Voucher: 175063
175064 09/15~003 005922
Voucher: 175064
175065 0~15/2003 004093
Voucher: 175065
q"~175066 09/15/2003 005302
Voucher: 175066
d~175067 09/15~003 006873
Voucher: 175067
175068 09/15/2003 005033
Voucher: 175068
175069 09/15/2003 003469
Voucher: 175069
175070 09/15/2003 005940
Voucher: 175070
175071 09/15/2003 005277
Voucher: 175071
175072 09/15/2003 004849
Voucher: 175072
175073 0~15/2003 005984
Voucher: 175073
175074 0~15/2003 000106
Voucher: 175074
PUGET SOUND REGIONAL C
QUADRANT CORPORATION
QWEST
QWEST DEX
QWEST INTERPRISE
RAMSEY LANDSCAPE MAIN
REGENCY CLEANERS
RITTER VEGETATION SERVI
ROAD WARRIORS INC
RUDDELL INTERNATIONAL
SAFEGUARD BUSINESS SYS
SAMS SANITARY & MAINTEN
SCHOOL-DAZE INC
SELECT TRAVEL INC
342-691-1008
0421
02-44237
206t028674
2536619833
2539469943
2539427800
016170933000
253d08604604
3146
18432
619
08505
T1-1644
019008885
80209
205876
205875
308191052
308201010
308211010
308191050
07/31'/2003
07/31/2003
09/05/2003
08/16/2003
08/16/2003
08/16/2003
08/25/2003
08/22/2O03
08/19/2003
09/02/2003
09/01/2003
08/25/2003
08/25/2003
08/18/2003
08/20/2003
08/20/2003
08/06/2003
08/05/2003
08/19/2003
08/20/2003
08/21/2003
08/19/2003
PVVTR-UTILITY CHARGES
PSRC DUES ASSESSMENT F
PW-RFD EXPR FEE:#01-10
MSTEL- 8/16-9/16/03 PHONE/[
MSTEL-8/16-9/16/03 PHONE/I:
MSTEL-8/16-9/16/03 PHONE/I:
MSTEL-8/25/03-9/25/03 PHON
PKDBC-DIRECTORY AD
MSTEL-8/19-9/18)03 DATA C
AG00-12C:(AUG/03)ROW LN
AG02-98:(AUG/03)PS DRY C
PKM-ROADSIDE SPRAYING
PWST-TRAFFIC CONTROL S
PS-TAZER HOLSTER~
MC-CHECKS/BUSINESS FOR
PKCP-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE
RCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES
RCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES
PS-CITY TRAVEL
PS-CITY TRAVEL
PS-CITY TRAVEL
PS-CITY TRAVEL
1.17
23,333.00
1,125.43
541.02
61.78
59.76
30.27
155.69
521.11
12,892.41
3,033.32
489.60
3,478.00
97.87
207.94
318.87
42.29
33.40
461.50
461.50
416.00
288.00
33,764.64
23,333.00
1,125.43
692.83
155.69
521.11
12,892.41
3,033.32
489.60
3,478.00
97.87
207.94
318.87
75.69
1,627.00
Page:18
apChkLst
09115/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 19
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
175075 09/15/2003 001988
Voucher: 175075
175076 09/15/2003 002231
Voucher: 175076
175077 09/15/2003 002501
Voucher: 175077
175078 09/15/2003 003389
Voucher: 175078
175079 09/15/2003 000056
Voucher: 175079
175080 09/15/2003 007646
Voucher: 175080
175081 09/15/2003 004550
Voucher: 175081
175082 09/15/2003 003697
Voucher: 175082
175083 09/15/2003 003001
Voucher: 175083
175084 09/15/2003 001885
Voucher: 175084
175085 09/15/2003 003198
Voucher: 175085
175086 09/15/2003 002548
Voucher: 175086
175087 09/15/2003 006151
Voucher: 175087
175088 09/15/2003 000872
Voucher: 175088
SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY 814~529
828/2014
821/3358
807/5827
SHELDON & ASSOCIATES IN 97053
SHOPE CONCRETE PRODUC'120638
SHUPP, CONNIE 120863
SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTI29855
SKCMSC FEDERAL WAY ASS 02-45440
01-41287
SOFTECH INC 130345
SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 13039132-01
SOUTH KING COUNCIL-HUMAC2614R4865
SPARKS CAR CARE
SPEEDY SIGN-A-RAMA
11708
11810
11880
11703
11803
11804
6961
SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL
SPRINT SPECTRUM
155615
155546
156317
0129395367-7
STAR LAKE GREENHOUSE I 5263
Inv Date Descril3tion-
Amount Paid
08/14/2003
08/28/2003
08/21/2003
08/07/2003
07/15/2003
PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES AC
PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES AC
PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES AC
PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES AC
CDPL-ENVR:ST LUKE'S (GR
20.50
19.49
18.81
18.81
760.60
08/12/2003 SWM-TYPE 16 RISER; SWM (:
205.63
08/06/2003 PS-CITY BUSINESS REIMBUF
87.58
08/27/2003 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES
268.81
09/05/2003
09/05/2003
08/08/2003
PW-RFD EXPR FEE:#01-10
PW-RFD EXPR FEE:#01-10
MSDP/PS-EQUIFAX SOFTVVA
2,783.32
1,657.46
60.00
08/27/2003 PWST-SAFETY EQUIPMENT
135.99
09/03/2003 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE
150.00
08/14/2003 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT
08/26/2003 MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/SER
09/05/2003 MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/SER
08/1 !/2003 'PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT
08/22/2003 MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/SER
08/22/2003 MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS/SER
09/02/2003 CDPL - SMALL PUBLIC NOTI£
485.81
323.06
265.12
41.88
39.37
27.20
870.40
08/03/2003
08/04~003
08/04D003
08/15/2003
PKRLS-PEST CONTROL SVC
PKDBC-PEST CONTROL SVC
PKM-ST LK PEST CONTROL
PS-7/15-8/14/03 CELLULAR A
92.48
92.48
89.22
434.24
08/28/2003 PKM-PLANTS FOR PARK GR
75.75
Check Total
77.61
760.60
205.63
87.58
268.81
4,440.78
60.00
135.99
150.00
1,182.44
870.40
274.18
434.24
75.75
Page: 19
apChkLst
09/15/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 20
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
175089 09/15/2003 004926
Voucher: 175089
175090 09/15/2003 007407
Voucher: 175090
175091 09/15/2003 004356
Voucher: 175091
175092 09/15/2003 006655
Voucher: 175092
175093 09/15/2003 000588
Voucher: 175093
175094 09/15/2003 000873
Voucher: 175094
175095 09/15~003 006033
Voucher: 175095
175096 09/15/2003 004012
Voucher: 175096
175097 09/15D003 001267
Voucher: 175097
175098 09/15~003 007520
Voucher: 175098
175099 09/15~003 001436
Voucher: 175099
STRIPE RITE INC 5843
5701
SUMMERS' WORLD LTD 52390
SUMPTER, KYLE
EMPL REIMB
SZPEK, JOSEPH
41410O2443
TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES 008-280-509
005-224-608
008-227-187
TARGET STORES DIVISION,~1103549994
THE FAB SHOP LLC
Z-1747
THOMPSON PUBLISHING GR 5638620
TOP FOODS HAGGEN INC
TRAFFIC SMITHY INC
TREE RECYCLERS
347184
336343
332507
332551
332592
345948
TSS3040
LK GROVE PR
Inv Date
08/27/2003
08/22/2003
07/04/2003
09/03/2003
07/01/2003
08/26/2003
08/25/2003
08/26/2003
08/23/2003
08/28/2003
05/09D003
08/14/2003
04/16/2003
08/01/2003
08/08/2003
08/22/2003
08/22/2003
08/31/2003
08/22/2003
Descri~)tion
Amount Paid
AG03-141:(8/24) 2003 PAVEM!
AG03-141 :(8/18) 2003 PAVEMI
PRCS-WATER WALKWAY W/
25,130.00
12,322.60
2,500.00
PS-REIMB:FIREARMS TRNG ,'
98.16
CDB - REIMBURSEMENT FO
160.00
PKDBC/KFT-PUBLIC UTILIT
PKDBC/KFT-PUBLIC UTILIT
PKKFT-PUBLIC UTILITIES~
PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
1,870:41
444.19
49.46
3.53
MSFLT - REPAIRS SVC
234.36
LAW-LIBRARY FAIR LABOR S
329.00
PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
AG03-156:CITYWIDE TRAFFI
63.98
53.45
35.97
18.43
10.03
3.69
2,856.00
PKM-TREE CLEARING SERV
489.60
Check Total
37,452.60
2,500.00
98.16
160.00
2,364.06
3.53
234.36
329.00
185.55
2,856.00
489.60
Page: 20
apChkLst
09/15/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 21
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
175100 09/15/2003 001715
Voucher: 175100
'~175101 09/15/2003 003572
Voucher: 175101
---- 175102 09/15/2003 007654
Voucher: 175102
175103 09/15/2003 002426
Voucher: 175103
175104 09/15/2003 000618
Voucher: 175104
175105 09/15/2003 005019
Voucher: 175105
175106 09/15/2003 007357
Voucher: 175106
175107 09/15/2003 000908
Voucher: 175107
175108 09/15/2003 006974
Voucher: 175108
175109 09/15~2003 001805
Voucher: 175109
175110 09/15~2003 005704
Voucher: 175110
TRUGREEN-CHEMLAWN
TUCKER, CURTIS
TUCKER, LINDA M
349008
349010
352855
352853
352854
352856
349007
349009
352850
352851
352852
349006
EMPL REIMB
EXPLORER EV
03-43370
UNITED GROCERS CASH & C42774
43017
39262
40740
UNITED HORTICULTURAL SU 7937894
UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE35125006-001
35416788-001
UNITED REPROGRAPHICS 0051549-1N
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTOOUCW031
0CIP033
UNIVERSITY PUGET SOUND C2474R4863
VADIS NORTHWEST
00013363
VERTICAL TRANSPORTATIO DVT05642X903
08/22/2003
08/22/2003
08/30/2003
08/30/2003
08/30/2003
08/30/2003
08/22/2003
08~22~2003
08~30~2003
08/30/2003
08/30/2003
0812212003
09/02/2003
08/23/2003
08/18/2003
08/18/2003
08/19/2003
07~9/2003
08/07/2003
08/07~003
08/16/2003
08/25/2003
08/05/2003
09/30/2003
11/03/2003
09/03/2003
08/31/2003
08/20/2003
PKM-FAC:PESTICIDE SVCS F
PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S
PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S
PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S
PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S
PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S
PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S
PKM-FAC:PESTICIDE SVCS F
PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S
PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S
PKM-GRD MTN:PESTICIDE S
PKRCS-PESTICIDE SVCS KL
PS-REIMB:MAHER FUNERAL
PS-POLICE BUSINESS REIM
PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO£
PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
PKM-CUSTOM DRY BLEND M
PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
CM-PRINTING OF ARCHITEC'
PWDS-COURSE REGISTR. A
PWDS-COURSE REGISTR. A
PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE
AG00-2B:(AUG/03) LITTER C
AG00-171 :(AUG/03)KLCC EL
569.02
353.60
353.60
239.36
125.12
118.59
106.62
103.36
96.83
89.22
59.84
58.75
86.28
61.20
75.00
51.72
40.20
21.49
14.41
1,040.13
509.35
114.38
112.17
310.00
270.00
150.00
4,101.42
145.68
2,273.91
147.48
75.00
127.82
1,040.13
623.73
112.17
580.00
150.00
4,101.42
145.68
Page:21
apChkLst
09/15/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 22
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
175111 09/15/2003 006278
Voucher: 175111
175112 09/15/2003 004258
Voucher: 175112
175113 09/15/2003 000340
Voucher: 175113
175114 09/15/2003 001379
Voucher: 175114
175115 09/15/2003 000851
Voucher: 175115
175116 09/15/2003 004628
Voucher: 175116
r--,, 175117 09/15/2003 000061
Voucher: 175117
'J~ 175118 09/15/2003 000514
Voucher: 175118
175119 09/15/2003 006853
Voucher: 175119
175120 09/15/2003 007271
Voucher: 175120
175121 09/15/2003 000802
Voucher: 175121
175122 09/15/2003 005565
Voucher: 175122
175123 09/15/2003 003500
Voucher: 175123
175124 09/15/2003 001241
Voucher: 175124
175125 09/15/2003 006116
Voucher: i 75125
VISUAL EFFECTS 12941
WA STATE DEPT OF LICENS
WA STATE INFORMATION S
WA STATE L&I ELEVATOR S
WA STATE PATROL
WA STATE PATROL IDENTI
WA STATE REVENUE DEPAR
WA STATE-STATE REVENUE
WAHl, PRAN 9/2/03
WASHINGTON APPRAISAL S
WCMA-WA CITY MANAGEME
WELCOME COMMUNICATIO
WESCOM COMMUNICATIO
WEST COAST AWARDS
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CE
JULY 2003
1105907
0056363
10304371
103O4994
JULY 2OO3
601-223-5385
AUG 2003
6O33
6034
8/19-8/22/03
3052
3032
13828
13829
13830
13831
13832
13833
40O25
40026
40078
804823750
Inv Date Descril3tion
08/21/2003 PS- WINDOW TINTING
09/09/2003 PS-REMIT CPL FEES ('JULY
05/02/2003 COPSMORE-WINDOWS SER
08/01/2003 KLCC-ELVTR OPER PERMIT-
07/08/2003
08/05~003
09/09D003
09/12~003
MSHR-JUNE 03 BACKGROUN
MSHR-JULY 2003 BACKGROI.
PS-REMIT CPL (FINGERPRIN
MSF-(AUG/03)SALES/USE t
09/08/2003 MSF- AUG 2003 REMIT STAT
09/02/2003 INTERPRETER SERVICES
08/19~003
08/27/2003
08/12~003
MS-APPRAISAL FEE:JOB#03
MS-APPRAISAL FEE:JOB# 0
WCMA SUMMER CONF REG I
08/26/2003
08/18/2003
08/28/2003
08/28/2003
08/28/2003
08/28/2003
08/28~2003
08/28/2003
08/12/2003
08/12/2003
08/25/2003
07/31/2003
MSDP/PS - NEXTEL REPLAC
MSDP - NEXTEL CAR CHARG
PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST
PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST
PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST
PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST
PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST
PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST
PRCS-SPRING II 40+SOCCER
PRCS-T-SHIRTS FOR ADULT
CDB - FEDWAY LOGO SHIRT
MSDP-7/03 DATABASE/COM
Amount Paid
233.92
459.00
27.68
100.00
20.00
10.00
648.00
5,934.53
51,077.40
100.00
3,500.00
2,000.00
360.00
359.51
173.98
184.96
87.04
87.04
87.04
87.04
87.04
135.56
73.88
64.08
1,130.68
Check Total
233.92
459.00
27.68
100.00
30.00
648.00
5,934.53
51,077.40
100.00
5,500.00
360.00
533.49
620.16
273.52
1,130.68
Page: 22
apChkLst
09/15/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 23
Bank: kev us bank
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Invoice
175126 09/15/2003 000541
Voucher: 175126
175127 09/15/2003 001990
Voucher: 175127
175128 09/15/2003 000076
Voucher: 175128
175129 09/15/2003 002204
Voucher: 175129
175130 09/15/2003 003380
Voucher: 175130
175131 09/15/2003 003521
Voucher: 175131
175132 09/15/2003 004209
Voucher: 175132
175t33 09/15/2003 000660
Voucher: 175133
175134 09/15/2003 000520
Voucher: 175134
WESTERN EQUIPMENT DIS 334787
WESTERN LINEN/WELCOME ID19101
WFOA-WA FINANCE OFFIC
WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY
WILSON, BRIAN
WILSON, GREG
9/16-9/19/O3
24-124603
B WILSON
G WILSON
WLEEA (WA LAW ENFORCEM8/13-8/18/03
WOODWORTH & COMPANY I 159071
158633
WSAMA FALL 03 KJ
FALL 03 PAR
Inv Date Descril~tion
Amount Paid
06/11/2003 MSFLT-TORO MOWER REPA
08/11/2003 PKRLS- 7/28 & 8/11/03 CARPE
09~04~2003 MSA-WFOA 48TH ANNUAL C
08/19/2003 SWM-GRASS SEED, EROSI
08/18/2003 PS-MAHER FUR:DINNER-LA
08/03/2003 PS-MAHER FUR:QFC,STARB
08/11/2003 PS-2003 SUMMER EXPLORE
08/31/2003 SWMCIP-GENERAL CONTRA
08/20/2003 PWSWM-GENERAL CONTR
08/25/2003 LAW-2003 WSAMA FALL CO
08/25/2003 LAW-2003 WSAMA FALL CO
134.16
90.05
260.00
54.94
222.84
84.76
290.00
372.87
332.04
145.00
145.00
Sub total for us bank:
Check Total
134.16
90.05
260.00
54.94
222.84
84.76
290.00
704.91
290.00
1,138,374.87
Page: 23
apChkLst
09/15/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 24
242 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks: 1,138,374.87
Page: 24
apChkLst
09/15/2003 11:19:19AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 25
Bank code: key
Check # Date
175032 09/15/2003
175059 09/15/2003
Page: 25