Loading...
LUTC MINS 03-05-2001 MEETING SUMMARY In attendance: Committee members Dean McColgan, Chair, and Jeanne Burbidge; Deputy Mayor Linda Kochmar; City Manager David Moseley; Director of Community Development Services Kathy McClung; Public Works Director Cary Roe; City Attorney Bob Sterbank; Senior Planner Margaret Clark; Traffic Engineer Rick Perez; Administrative Assistant Sandy Lyle. 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair McColgan called the meeting to order at 5:32 pm. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the February 21, 2001, meeting were approved as presented. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT Dave Kaplan, an active and interested citizen, quoted an article he read in the USA Today. He provided the clipping to the Committee. It will be copied and distributed to the Council and interested staff. 4. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Draft RFP for Downtown Market Study – The Committee m/s/c a recommendation that the Council approve the draft Request for Proposals to conduct a market study for the City Center Core and Frame zoning districts. Conducting the study is the first step to determine residential and housing capacity the City can expect to see in the downtown area in the next several years. The information gathered will be used as the basis for completing the Planned Action SEPA budgeted and planned for this year’s work program. B. 2001 Site-Specific Comprehensive Plan Map Change Requests – Staff introduced the site specific Comprehensive Plan Map Change Requests. There are six new requests and one request to amend the text of the Comprehensive Plan. There are four previous requests that have been through the selection process and are waiting for the Transportation Model to be finalized prior to moving forward. The selection criteria were discussed and reviewed for each request. The Committee m/s/c recommendation to the Council to go forward and study further Site Specific Requests #’s 3-6. Request #1 was recommended not to go forward for further analysis, because it did not meet Criteria #1 and 2. Site Specific Request #2, a request from Paul Benton, to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 4.03 acres located north of South 312th Street and east of First Avenue South from Professional Office (PO) to Office Park (OP) was withdrawn by Mr. Benton on the basis that Federal Way has a sufficient number of senior housing units. De-En Lang complimented staff on bring responsive to telephone calls, and clarified that Site Specific Request #6 was only for that portion of the site east of the Class II wetland, as only that portion of the site would be served by sanitary sewer. Dave Kaplan reminded staff that the wetlands on this site were contiguous to the wetlands on the Silverwood site. City of Federal Way City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee March 5, 2001 City Hall 5:30 pm Council Chambers C. Allowed Maximum Heights and Other Miscellaneous Changes and Amendments – As part of its regular review of development regulations, staff has identified the need to amend the text of Federal Way City Code (FWCC), Section 22, to address some inconsistencies and other clarifications regarding the definition, height and location of schools; ensuring consistency of building height in multifamily residential zones; and modification of parking regulations for churches to address a wide range of uses associated with churches. The Committee agreed to add “professional training or continuing education in these or similar professions” to the definition of Business or Vocational Schools. The Committee also agreed that schools should be able to build higher if setbacks are increased. The Committee thought it reasonable to require churches to provide a transportation management plan addressing the varied uses of the specific site in order to assess parking needs. Len Zickler of AHBL Engineers, the firm working on the new High School, commended staff for responding to the needs of the school district, even though he, personally finds the language in the use charts confusing. He stated that the School District supports the proposed amendments before the Committee. The issue of increased heights generated much discussion among Committee members because any time a height increase is proposed, the impairment of a view is possible. The Committee would like to preserve Council’s right to review such cases. As a result the Committee added to the future work program a comprehensive overview of height issues. The Committee then m/s/c the amendments to the Code as amended and recommended approval to the City Council at its meeting on March 20, 2001. 5. FUTURE MEETINGS The next meeting will be held in Council Chambers at 5:30 pm on March 19, 2001. 6. ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 7:05pm. I:\LU-TRANS\March 5, 2001 sum.doc