The URL can be used to link to this page

LUTC PKT 07-15-2002MEE'I'~NG AGENDA 2. 3. 4. CALL TO ORDER Approval of Minutes of the July 1, 2001, Meeting PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes) BUSINESS 1TEMS A. Federal Way School District Impact Fee Update B. Near-Term Action Agenda for Salmon Habitat Conservation C. South 3734 Gravel Removal Project FUTURE MEEI-~NG AGENDA I-I'EMS ADJOURN Action Wang/20 rain Information Bucich/20 rain Action Bucich/10 min Committee Members: Eric Fa/son, Chair Dean I~lcCo/gan Nichae/ Park City StalE: Kathy NcClung, D/rector, Community Development Services Sandy L y/e, Administrative Assistant 253.551.'t116 K:\LUTC Agendas and Summaries 2002XJuly 15, 2002, LUTC Agenda. doc July, 1, 2002 5130!Pm """ ::! ..... : City Council ' . ,: ......:. ~. ,,~, ...,,~.~-~;~. _. ~,~.. '. Land Use/Transportation Commi ee ',.'i," ..' ..' .' :" .' ~' :':', .~: MEETING SUMMARY In attendance: Committee members Eric Faison, Chair, Deputy Mayor Dean McColgan, and Mike Park; Councilmember Linda Kochmar; City Manager David Mosely; Director of Community Development Services Kathy McClung; Public Works Director Cary Roe; Assistant City Attorney Karen Kirkpatrick; Street Systems Engineer Marwan Salloum; Senior Planner Margaret Clark; Traffic Engineer Rick Perez; Administrative Assistant Sandy Lyle. 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Faison called the meeting to order at 5:32 pm. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The summary of the June 17, 2002, meeting was approved as presented. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT There was no public comment on any item not included in the agenda. 4. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Street Vacation Request for a Portion of South 316*h Street and 8t~ Avenue South - The Federal Way School District petitioned the City to vacate a podion of south 316th Street (6th to 8~h Avenue South) which is unopened right of way abutting school property along the entire southern border of the Mirror Lake Elementary School location and which is also maintained by the school district. Since the Comprehensive Plan does not show a future street at this location the street vacation was sought as part of a plan to improve the safety of school bus circulation and provide separation of buses and student drop-off through school property as well as to provide additional parking. The Committee m/s/c the recommendation that the Council adopt at the July 16, 2002, meeting and to set a public hearing to take place on August 20, 2002, at the City Council meeting. B. Code Amendments: Community Design Guidelines Pertaining to Maximum Fa~;ade Length/Roof Pitch for Non-Residential Buildings in Residential Zones and Amending the allowable Maximum Height for Religious Institutions in the Use Zone Charts - In the process of reviewing the site plan for the Christian Faith Center (CFC) prior to entering into a development agreement with CFC, three issues, which surface often in review of other churches and schools, have arisen. The first two pertain to language within the community Design Guidelines relating to maximum fa(;ade length and roof pitch for non-residential buildings in residential zones. The third is the allowable maximum height for religious institutions in the Multiple Family Use Zone Chart. As review of the CFC site plan continues, additional issues may arise which may be unique to the development. Others may be issues that are more widespread. The Committee m/sic to recommend approval to the City Council at its July 16, 2002, meeting to add the following to the Planning Commission 2002 Work Program: Amend FWCC, Section 22-1638 (15) to provide for flexibility in addressing fa~;ade lengths and modulation requirements for large institutional projects within residential zones. Amend FWCC, Section22-1638 (13) to provide for flexibility in addressing roof pitch requirements for large institutional projects within residential zones. Amend the Use Zone Charts to allow increased heights for religious institutions. C. Polic~ Review for Neighborhood Trafficth Safety Balloting~h - Citizens submitting a petition for traffic calming devices on 21s Avenue SW between SW 304 Street and SW 312 Street have questioned the validity of the staff interpretation of the balloting area defined in the Council adopted policy for the Neighborhood Traffic Safety (NTS) Program. Several neighbors have protested the ballot failure of installation of an aWway stop at the intersection of 21st Avenue SW and SW 304~ Street and a speed hump at 21s~ Avenue SW between SW 305th Street and SW 307th Street. Nancy Combs and her neighbors perceive traffic speeds and noise to be excessive past their homes. They object to the larger balloting area that was previously established, based upon an increased balloting area to include all impacted residents of the neighborhood. Currently, each proposed device has its own balloting area. Those on one end of a project do not necessarily vote on devices on the other end of the project. The Committee m/s/c no change in balloting area procedures and the addition of language allowing speed tables on principal collectors in 25 mph zones. The Committee requested staff 'develop a threshold considering speed, volume, collision frequency, and collision severity that would bypass balloting procedures. The Committee recommended approval by the City Council at the July 1.6, 2002, meeting. 5..FUTURE MEETINGS The next meeting will be July .15, 2002. · 6. ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 6:50p.m. K \LUTC Agendas and Sum/~arics 2002Lluly I, 2002,LUTC Minutes doc CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Date: To: Via: From: Subject: July 10, 2002 Federal Way City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee David H. Moseley,~~nager Iwen Wang, Management Services Director Federal Way Public Schools 2002/2003 Capital Facilities Plan~School Impact Fee The City has received the Federal Way School District's 2002/2003 Capital Facilities Plan with the proposed school impact fees for the City's annual review and adoption. The new fees, if approved, will be effective January 1, 2003, are $3,894 per single-family unit and $1,094 per multi-family dwelling unit. This is a $1,278 or 49% increase from the $2,616 single-family rate, and $198 or 22% increase from the $896 multi-family rate. A number of variables go into the school impact fee calculation. Among them are the District's facility needs, construction costs required for schools, and the student generating factor (average students per household in elementary, middle, and high schools respectively) in new single and multi-family developments. The calculated amounts are then reduced by any state matching funds and voter approved property taxes for construction. Finally, a 50% factor is applied to eliminate imperfections in the fee calculation model. The higher fees are caused primarily by a 7% overall increase in the student generating factor (from an average of 0.62 students per household to 0.66 students). More important is the substantial increase in middle (24%) and high school (45%) student counts. Because the District's capital requirements are concentrated at the middle and high school levels, the increased student count amongst these two levels led to a substantial increase in calculated fees. The 18% decrease in elementary school student count levels did not generate any offsetting savings. While the proposed fees are substantially higher than what we currently have, they are still among the lowest in King County. Attachments: Federal Way School District 2002/2003 Capital Facilities Plan (the new impact fee calculation is on page 26). Contntittee Recommendation: For~vard the draft Federal Way School District 2002/2003 Capital Facilities Plan and proposed impact tee to full Council for approval with implementation of the proposed fee of $3,894 per single family development and $1,094 per multi-family development effective January 1, 2003. Committee Approval Conunittee Chair Cotmnittee Member Committee Member Federal Way School District No. 210 2002/03 Capital Facilities Plan Building for the 21~t Century Mission~ Federal Way Public .Schools is obligated to educate all students in academic knowledge, skills, abilities and responsible behavior to be successful, contributing members of a free society. Vision: Every Student a Reader * All 3rd graders reading at grade level by 2004 * All lOth graders reading at grade level by 2006. * *90% of ALL students reading at grade level by 2009 Federal Way Public Schools 31405 18'~ Avenue S Federal Way, Washington 98003-5433 (253) 945-2000 Federal Way. Public Schools Every Student, a Reader This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools. June 2002 FEDERAL WAY' PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Ed Barney Charles Hoff Bob Millen Don Putman Earl VanDorien SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R. Murphy FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS· TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction Inventory of Educational Facilities Inventory of Nondnstructional Facilities Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities Needs Forecast - New Facilities Six Year Finance Plan MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction Map - Elementary Boundaries Map ~ Junior High Boundaries Map ~ Senior High Boundaries SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction Building Capacities Portable Locations Student Forecast Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fee Calculations SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2001/02 PLAN ii iii-v 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-13 14-15 16-18 19-23 24-26 27-29 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 2lA, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective March 1996, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan as of June 2002. This Plan has been adopted by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the ret>~on s need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. Additional plans will be consistent with the six year Capital Facilities Plan. iii FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES' PLAN INTRODUCTION (continued) On October 12, 1998 the Federal Way School District Board of Education approved a recommendation to move to a Pre Ko5 elementary, 6-8 middle school, and 9-12 high · school grade configuration beginning in the fall of 2003 or as additional high school space allows. This grade configuration is believed to be more responsive to student needs. It will allow for smaller elementary enrollments with room for lower primary class sizes. The middle school will provide more developmentally appropriate instruction and a better academic transition between elementary school and high school. Middle schools will also allow two-year preparation for the WA State 7th grade test, and matches most western Washington Districts. With State and District standards becoming even tougher, 9th grade students need to be brought into the high school environment and given access to high school subject specialist. The four-year high school plan combines the 9-12 graduation credit system, allows two-year preparation for the WA State l0th grade test, and physically places the high school students together. Federal Way Public Schools must meet the needs of a growing student and community population. The District must be flexible with building, programs and staffing to meet the needs of the 21st Century, while being financially responsible and sensitive to the current tax rates. A flexible, cost effective and educationally beneficial approach that integrates academics and high tech/high skill preparation is needed. By extending the existing debt and creatively using new and existing facilities, the District can meet these complex needs with no increase, on average, in local tax rates. Federal Way citizens approved a bond proposal of $83 million in September 1999. This bond will provide for a comprehensive high school ($44 million); a middle school ($17 million); expansion and improvement of existing schools ($9 million); replacement of Truman High School ($6 million) and other general improvements ($7 million). Additional planned improvements included in the bond proposal are: parking and pedestrian safety, playgrounds and sports fields, new classroom start-up and music equipment, information systems and networks and emergency communications. Planned opening for the new high school is September 2003. No Board decision has been made on the opening configuration of the new high school. There is currently a recommendation before the Board to open the new high school with grades 9 and 10 mandatory and grades 11 and 12 opt in. This recommendation would allow 11th and 12th grade students in 2003 to finish high school in their cun-ent building. This recommendation has substantial capacity impacts on the three existing high schools for two years. There is a study in progress to determine the feasibility of this recommendation. Truman High School will open in February of 2003. A Middle School Transition Team began meeting in May 2001 to develop recommendations for the middle school programs. These recommendations were adopted by the Board of Education on March 25, 2002. It is anticipated that the adopted programs will have facility impacts. In the coming months, middle school principals will present school models to implement these changes. A similar process is underway with the high schools. Facility needs will be evaluated over the next few months and any changes to the capacity will be noted in the District's 2003/04 Capital Facilities Plan. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Federal Way Public Schools opened the Internet Academy in the 1996/97 school year. This program currently serves approximately 617 students, 114 are students also served in other Federal Way School District buildings. Internet Academy has grown from about 60 students to the current 617 in six years. The forecast for this school is based on current average annual enrollment. Historical growth has not been a reliable tool to forecast this enrollment. Intemet Academy is currently operating out of leased space consisting of administrative areas and a computer lab area. This capacity is not included in the analysis of instructional spaces. The facility needs are unique to a program of "distance learners". Federal Way Public Academy opened in the 1999/00 school year in six portables on the Illahee Junior High site. Two additional portables were added for opening the 2000/01 school year to expand the program to include ninth grade students. The school served 180 seventh, eight and ninth grade students this year and will serve 180 - 210 students in grades seven, eight and nine in the 2002/03 school year. The District is currently negotiating the purchase of a building for the Federal Way Public Academy. The anticipated move to this building is in February 2003. v '. FEDERAL.WAy PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 - THE cApITAL FACILITIES iPLAN The State Growth Management Act requires 'that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. This is followed by a Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARy SCHOOLS Adelaide Brigadoon Camelot Enterprise Green Gables Lake Dolloff Lake Grove Lakeland Mark Twain Meredith Hill Mirror Lake Nautilus Olympic View Panther Lake Rainier View Sherwood Forest Silver Lake Star Lake Sunnycrest Twin Lakes Valhalla Wildwood Woodmont JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy Illahee Kilo Lakota Sacajawea Saghalie Totem SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur Federal Way Thomas Jefferson ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School Harry S Truman High School LEASED SPACE Internet Academy 1635 SW 304th Street 3601 SW 336th Street 4041 S 298th Street 35101 5th Avenue SW 32607 47th Avenue SW 4200 S 308th Street 303 SW 308th Street 35675 32nd Avenue S 2450 S Star Lake Road 5830 S 300th Street 625 S 314th Street 1000 S 289th Street 2626 SW 327th Street 34424 1 st Avenue S 301'5 S 368th Street 34600 12th Avenue SW 1310 SW 325th Place 4014 S 270th Street 24629 42nd Avenue S 4400 SW 320th Street 27847 42nd Avenue S 2405 S 300th Street 26454 16th Avenue S. 36001 1s~ Ave S 36001 1 st Avenue S 4400 S 308th Street 1415 SW 314th Street 1101 S Dash Point Road 33914 19th Avenue SW 26630 40th Avenue S 2800 SW 320th Street 30611 16th Avenue S 4248 S 288th Street 31455 28th Ave S 31455 28th Ave S 32020 1st Ave S Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Kent Kent Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Des Moines Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Kent Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way 98023 98023 98001 98023 98023 98001 98023 98001 98003 98001 98003 98003 98023 98003 98003 98023 98023 98032 98032 98023 98001 98003 98198 98003 98003 98001 98O23 98003 98O23 98O32 98023 98003 98001 98003 98003 98003 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES .Developed Property Administrative Building MOT Site Central Kitchen Federal Way Memorial Field Leased Space Community Resource Center ECEAP Offices 31405 18th Avenue S 1066 S 320th Street 1344 S 308th Street 1300 S 308th Street 1928 S Sea Tac Mall 30819 14th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Federal Way 98003 Federal Way 98003 Federal Way 98003 Federal Way 98003 Federal Way 98003 Site # 23 35 40 63 71 72 82 84 85 96 Undeveloped Property Location SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S E of 10th Avenue SW Between SW 334th & SW 335th Streets E of 47th Avenue SW & SW 314th Place S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S 36600 block of Pacific Highway S Ist Way S and S 342nd St 3737 S 360th St 16th Ave S and S 364th Way S 308th St and 14th Ave S Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST -EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Truman High School Replacement with expansion. Anticipated source of funds is currently authorized bond issues Interim Capacity Purchase and Relocate Portables Decatur High School, Federal Way High School and Thomas Jefferson High School Various School Sites Expansion Parking Safety; Network Upgrades; Automated Libraries; Elementary Playgrounds; High School Sports Fields; Emergency Communications. Anticipated source of funds is Impact Fees. Anticipated source of funds is currently authorized bond issues. Anticipated source of funds is future bond issues. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES' NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS New High School Site 85 Anticipated source of funds is currently authorized bound issues and state matching funds. Federal Way Public Academy 34620 9th Ave S, Anticipated source of Federal Way, WA funds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues and/or non- voted debt issues. Additional Secondary Capacity Unknown Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues and/or non- voted debt issues. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Six Year Finance Plan ;ecured Funding Sources 2002 2003 2004 2005 . 2006 2007 Total Revenm impact Fees (I) $17.5,00~ $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,00~ $190,831 $1,065,831 Land Sale Funds (2) $844,026 5844,0261 Bond Funds (3) $16,281,6921 516,281,692] YOTAL $16,456,6921 $175,000 $175,000 $1,019,026 $175,000 $190,831 $18,191,549 Unsecured Funding Sources State Match Funds (5) $15,200,00C Bond or Levy Funds (3) $50,585,0tY2 Land Fund Sales (6) Impact Fees (4) $1,500,00C TOTAL $67,285,000 NEW SCIIOOLS 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Cost New Secondary Capacity (9) $26,250 $233,046 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $9,140,000 $1,000,704 515,400,00( New Senior High School (12) $21,610,000 $18,017,263 539,627,263] New Senior High School Site (I0) S01 New Secondary Capacity Site (11) $1,600,000 $1,600,00( Festeral Way Public Academy $3,000,000 $1,000,000 54,000,00( MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSION Truman Senior High (Alternative) $3,820,000' $2,134,718 55,954.718 Expansion Three High Schools $6,029,269 S6,029,2691 Expansion Elementary Schools $200,000 $1,500,000 $300,000 52,000,00C~ TEMPORARY FACILITIES Portables (7) $158,000: 5158,00( OTHER School Improvements (8) $267,919 $726,000 $4,852 S998,771! Facilities Department $250,000' 5250,000 $250,000 $250,000 5250,000 $250,000 S1500,0001 TOTAL $35,361,438 $25,461,027 $2,554,852 $3,250,000 $9,390,000 $1,250,704 $77,268,021 NOTES: 1. These fees are currently being held in a King County, City of Federal Way and City of Kent impact fee account, and will be available for use by the District for system improvements. 2. These funds come from various sales of land and are set aside for estimated expenditures. 3. These funds will be used for future projects. 4. These are projected fees based upon known residential developments in the District over the next six years. 5. These funds are projected state matching funds. 6. These funds are projected land sale income. 7. These fees represent the cost of moving and siting existing portables and purchasing new portables. The District may choose to purchase new portables in the years shown. This estimate may also include the cost of purchasing these portables. 8. These projects have been approved by the Board of Directors and cover most schools. These projects do not increase capacity. These projects include: school networks, information and library systems; new classroom start up; elementary playgrounds and high school sports fields; music equipment; emergency communication. 9. New secondary capacity is the middle school component of the bond. This is shown as middle school itl tile impact fcc calculation The District is researching small school solutions that will increase capacity for students in thc secondary grades 10. Site purchase for the high school of $3.2 M was complete in tile 2000 calendur year. 1 I, Site pruchase for the middle school/new secondary capacity, site or sites to be dctennined 12. Total e penditures ttlrough tile I2/31/2000 for tile Senior ftigl~ School is $ 4,872,7371. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-6), seven junior high schools (grades 7-9), three senior high schools (grades 10-12) and two alternative schools (grades 7-12) for the 2001/02 school year. The Internet Academy serves grades K-12. On April 20, 1996, the Federal Way Public Schools Board of Education adopted the boundaries for these schools. In May 1999, minor adjustments to elementary boundaries were adopted. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school for each grade level (Harry S. Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs which affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. A Boundary Committee has been meeting since January 2002 to develop recommended Senior High and Middle School boundaries for 2003. A Board decision on this recommendation is anticipated at the June 25th, 2002 Board meeting. Elementary Boundaries will be studied in the 2002/03 school year. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. 7 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Co<se-- · Code-- · 10 Adelaide C-6 64 IIlahee E-9 16 Bdgadoon O*8 66 Kilo G-6 28 Camelot G-5 62 Lakota 22 Enterprise D-9 61 Sacajawea E-5 14 Green Gables A-7 70 Saghalie C-8 30 Lake Dolloff G-6 65 Totem G-3 11 Lake Grove D-6 8 Nledt F-6 :33 Lakeland F-9 2 Mark Twain F-4 29 Meredith Hill H-5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 6 Mirror Lake E-6 5 Nautilus E-5 Code-- · 15 Olympic View C-7 21 Panther Lake E-8 80 Decatur C-6 37 Rainier View F-10 81' Federal Way E-5 41 Sherwood Forest D-8 83 Thomas JeffersonG 24 Silver Lake D-7 8 Harry S. Truman F-6 26 Star Lake G-3 8 Merit F-6 25 Sunnycrest G-2 13 Twin Lakes B-6 27 Valhalla GJ' Future School Sites -- 7 Wildwood F-5 Surplus Sites -' t Woodmont F-3 100 Educational Service Center F-6 .- 99 Future Support Services E-8 ... g7 Maintenance-Operations-Transportation Parks - A B FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON and VlClNI7 N W^¥ (253) 945-2000 G FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN Junior High School Boundaries £ FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 2] 0 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Code-- · Code-- [] 10 Adelaide CB 64 Illahee E-9 16 Bdgadoon B~ 66 Kilo G*6 28 Camelot G-5 62 Lakota D-6 22 Enterprise D-9 61 Sacajawea E-5 14 Green Gables A-7 70 Saghalie C-8 30 Lake Dolloff G-6 65 Totem G-3 11 Lake Grove D-6 8 Merit F-6 33 Lakeland F-9 2 Mark Twain 29 Meredith Hill H-5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 6 Mirror Lake E~ 5 Nautilus E-5 Code-- [] 15 Olympic View C-7 21 Panther Lake E~ 80 Decatur C-6 37 Rainier View F-10 81 Federal Way E-5 41 Sherwood Forest D-8 83 Thomas JeffersonG-4 24 Silver Lake D-7 8 Harry S. TnJman F-6 26 Star Lake G-3 8 Merit F-6 25 Sunnycrest G-2 13 Twin Lakes B-6 ~- 27 Valhalla G~ Future School Sites -- 7 Wildwood F-5 Surplus Sites -- .1 Woodmont F-3 100 Educational Service Center F-6 99 Future Support Services E~ _.. 97 Maintenance-Operations-Transportation E~o Parks - FEDERAl WAY, WASHINGTON and VIClNI; FEDE?~LI ~ W^¥ (253) 945-2000 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN Senior High School Boundaries FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 2 ] 0 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Code-- [] Code-- [] 10 Adelaide C-6 64 Illahee E-9 16 BHgadoon B-8 66 Kilo G-6 28 Camelot G-5 62 Lakota D-6 22 Enterprise D-9 61 Sacajawea E-5 14 Green Gables A-7 70 Saghalie C-8 30 Lake Dolloff G-6 65 Totem G-3 11 Lake Grove D-6 8 Merit 33 Lakeland F-9 2 Mark Twain F-4 29 Meredith Hill H-5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 6 Mirror Lake E-6 5 Nautilus E-5 Code-- [] 15 Olympic View C-7 21 Panther Lake E-8 80 Decatur C-6 37 Rainier View F-10 81 FederalWay E-5 41 Sherwood Forest D~ 83 Thomas JeffersonG-4 24 Silver Lake [:)-7 8 Han-y S. Truman F-6 26 Star Lake G-3 8 Merit F-6 25 Sunnycrest G-2 13 Twin Lakes B-6 27 Valhalla G-4 Future School Sites --- 7 Wildwood F-5 Surplus Sites --- I Woodmont F-3 100 Educational Service Center F-6 99 Future Support Services E-8 97 Maintenance-Operations-Transportation E-6 Parks - FEDERA£ WAY, WASHINGTON and VlClNI7 N S W^Y (253) 945-2000 E u 10 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast - 2002 through 2007 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program Capacity for each of the schools in the District. This Full Time Equivalent (FTE) capacity is based on: The number of classrooms available in each school Any special requirements at each school The contracted class load by grade level In general, the District's cun'ent standard provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grade K through grade 2 is 20 students , for grades 3-6 is 25 students and grades 7-12 is 25 students. Gate (Gifted and Talented Education) classrooms are 25 students, and special education classrooms are 12 students: This size is determined based upon current ratios and trends as well as the physical size of the classroom. Educational Program Capacities change every year. This analysis is for the 2001/02 school year. The capacity of an individual school could and does change at any time depending on program changes which may require additional space. 3_2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING,PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY JUNIOR HIGH BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Adelaide 441 Brigadoon 487 Camelot 357 Enterprise 405 Green Gables 432 Lake Dolloff 475 Lake Grove 430 Lakeland 447 Mark Twain 500 Meredith Hill 417 Mirror Lake 372 Nautilus 485 Olympic View 409 Panther Lake 409 Rainier View 417 Sherwood Forest 487 Silver Lake 487 Star Lake 450 Sunnycrest 409 Twin Lakes 447 Valhalla 462 Wildwood 442 Woodmont 360 2001 TOTAL 10,027 I Elementary Average 436 ] Notes: Illahee 821 Kilo 854 Lakota 741 Sacaiawea 828 Saghalie 768 Totem 709 2001 TOTAL 4,721 I Junior lligh Average I 787 I SENIOR HIGIt BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Decatur 1,276 Federal Way 1,532 Thomas Jefferson 1,462 2001 TOTAL 4,270 ISenior High Average I 1,423 I ALTERNATIVE SCItOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Merit School 16 Truman ttigh School 194 2001 TOTAL 210 Elementary program capacities are based on the number of teaching stations in the building, contracted class size, and special use classrooms in place during the 01/02 school year. Ail available instructional space is calculated. Secondary program capacities are based on peak loading. The calculation is based on 25 students per available teaching stations. 13 FEDERAL wAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each'student a basic education. It is not efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for, 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCItOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS NON Adelaide 3 Brigadoon 1 Camelot 1 Enterprise 3 :Green Gables 1 Lake Dolloff 2 Lake Grove 2 Lakeland 2 Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 3 Mirror Lake 4 Nautilus 1 Olympic View 2 Panther Lake 3 Rainier View 3 Sherwood Forest 4 Silver Lake 4 Star Lake 4 Sunnycrest I 1 Twin Lakes 2 1 Valhalla 2 Wildwood 4 Woodmont 3 TOTAL 58 2 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SENIOR HIGH~ NON Decatur 4 Federal Way 1 Thomas Jefferson Truman 4 1 Merit 4 TOTAL 13 1 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SUPPORT FACILITIES MOT 1 Clothing, Bank 1 TOTAL 2 HEAD START I~ORTABLES AT I)ISTRICT Slrl L~ Mirror Lake 1 Sherwood Forest 1 Total 2 PORTABLES LOCATED AT JUNIOR HIGItS NON INSTRUCTIONAl, INS'I'I(UC I'IONA I. Federal Wa), Public Academy 8 1 Illahee 3 Kilo 3 1 Lakota 3 Sacajawea 3 Saghalie 4 Totem 5 TOTAL 29 2 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment MasterTM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrolhnent. In November of 2001, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in January 2002. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The report substantiated that for next year, Federal Way expects little or no growth. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else (e:g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2015. This model produces a projection that is between 24,000 and 26,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long- range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Short-term budget projections may be more conservative than the standard grade progression model. For the 2002/03 school year, the district chose the Enrollment MasterTM projection using standard grade progression model complemented by the work from the contracted report. Standard grade progression is a reasonably accurate method for the near term future when the near future looks much like the near past. Long range projections that es'tablish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district in the future. -FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE (K Headcount = .5 FTE; Junior High FI'E=.989 Headcount; Senior High FI'E = .933Headcouht) Total K -12 School Year 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 P2002~03 * P2003~04 P2004.05 P2005-06 P2006-07 P2007-08 * New Configuration Elementary Junior Itigh Senior Itigh FTE 10,689 4,838 3,796 19,323 10,863 4,930 3,913 19,706 11,123 5,073 4,082 20,278 11,480 5,080 4,120 20,680 11,622 5,110 4,348 21,079 11,640 5,300 4,390 21,330 11,498 5,331 4,4 l 5 21,244 11,234 5,419 4,588 21,241 9,333 5,501 6,420 21,254 9,297 5,562 6,462 21,321 9,307 5,506 6,534 21,347 9,390 5,374 6,642 21,406 9,63 7 5,300 6, 748 21,685 Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 School 9-12 Percent Change #REF.t 1.9% 2.8% 1.9% 1.9% 1.2% -0.4% 0.0% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.3% 1.3% High Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 3.0% 23,000 22,000 21,000 20,000 19,000 18,000 17,000 16,000 15,000 SchoolYear 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% -0.5% -1.0% [--'-'T'l FTE · Percent of Change 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002~03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summaries .All Grades, Elementary, 'Junior High/Middle School, and SeniOr High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, junior high, and senior high levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Add or subtract changes to capacity Special Education Changes Truman High modernization and expansion Increase Capacity at Three High Schools Addtional Secondary Capacity Federal Way Public Academy New High School Adjusted Program Capacity ENROLLMENT Actual [ -- Projected-- 2(50115002,[ I 2003 [ 2004 { 200~l 2006 19,228 [20,017 } 119,991 [ 21,381 [21,355 I 21,845 2007 21,845 21,845 Basic FTE Enrollment Intemet Academy Enrollment Basic FTE Enrollment without lntemet Academy 21,244 311 20,933 20,930 ] 20,943 21,010 121,036 21,095 21,374 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (1,705) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 750 ] 471 Current Portable Capacity 2,462 2,462 2,325 2,325 2,325 2,325 2,325 Add/Subtract Portable Capacity Add New Portable Capacity :::::::::::5:::::::::::: Deduct Portable Capacity [iii:i ii i ii :.:(i8~;) :i' Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,462 2,325 2,325 2,325 2,325 2,325 2,395 SURPLUS OR (UNItOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2,696 [ 2,644 [ 3,1)75 2,866 2O FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY. - ELEMENTARY SCIIOOLS Actual [ ['~ [ -- Projected-- 2ooI I ~oo~ [ ~' [ ~oo~ [ ~oo4 [ xoo~ [ -'~oo6 I ~oo7 CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 1. Special Education Changes Adjusted Program Capacity ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 11,498 2. Intemet Academy 58 Basic FI'E Enrollment without Intemet Academy 11,440 11,234 9,333 9,297 9,307 9,390 19,637 58 58 58 58 58 ,58 , 11,176 9,275 9,239 9,249 9,332 I 19'579 SURPLUS OR (UNItOUSED) PROGILSM CAPACITY RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1 ./rq Add]Subtract portable capacity '?}:i:::i:i:i: ] ::::i:i:i:i/ :i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i ::i:i:i:i:i:i::!:i: i:i:i:i:i:i:!:i:i: i:!:}:i:i:i~:.: ::::::: Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 NOTES: SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2,041 1,794 1. Add Programs 2 ECEAP, 1 SBD (Severely Behavioral Disordered) and 1 Pre-School Program. This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated. 2. Intemet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - MIDDLE SCHOOLS CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 1. Federal Way Public Academy 2 Addtional Secondary Capacity Adjusted Program Capacity ENROLLMENT . Actual [ -- Projected-- 4,721 4,721 ~ 4,933 4,933 4,933 4,933 5,423 Basic FTE Enrollment Intemet Academy Basic i~TE Enrolln-tent without Interact Academy 140 140 140 140 140I ~40 ~40 5,191 5,279 5,361 5,422 5,366 I 5,234 5,160 SURI'LUS OR (UNIIOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY RELOCATAllLI~ CAPACITY 4. Current Portable Capacity Add/Subtract portable capacity 5. Add new portable capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity SURPLUS OR (UNIIOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 710 710 1 759 759 710 [ 759 I [ 759 { 759 759 [ 759 759 759 I 759 759 NOTES: I Federal Way Public Academy Grades 6, 7 and 8 2. Add adcliti(mal secon&u-y capacity 326 I 3. Interact Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 4. Relocatable Capacity is 1oased on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities ~e available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 5 Add portable capacity to Sacajawea Junior High 948 1,022 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - SENIOR HIGH SCItOOLS CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Add or subtract changes in capacity 1. Truman Remodel 2. Add Capacity to Three High Schools 3. Federal Way Public Academy 4. Add New High School Adjusted Program Capacity ENROLLMENT Actual ' ] I --Projected-- [ oo l .l oo l oo 1 oo 1 ' oo 1 iiii:?!/i! ::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::: ~' ~::i}~6::::. :::?(}:?:.~::? ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: 4 453 5 056 6 472 6 472 6 472 6 472 6 47* Basic FTE Enrollment 5. Intemet Academy Basic Ed without Interact Academy I 4,415 4,588 6,420 6,462 6,534 6,642 6,748 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 - 4,302 4,475 6,307 6,349 6,421 6,529 6,635 SURPLUS OR (UNIIOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY I{ELOCATABLE CAPACITY 6. (57) (163) Current Portable Capacity 302 302 116 116 116 116 116 ity - ' '. ~ ' ' :.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:: ::.:.:. Add\Subtract ~or,a~,,e capac :. ;.:~ ::: :: ::: :: :.:.:.:.:: 7. Add new portable capacity :.)::' 'iii:ii !.!!!!.ii:: ::::i::::: i ii!i!!!!iii :iii'7ii 8. Deduct Portable Capacity i::::::::: :i:i: :i(186):i Adjusted Portable Capacity 302 116 116 116 116 116 186 SURPLUS OR (UNIIOUSED) PIIOGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 23 NOTES: 1. Truman High School modernization and expansion 2. Add capacity to three existing high schools 3. Federal Way Public Academy - Grades 9 and 10 4. Add new high school 5. Interact Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 6. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until l~ermanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 7. Add portable capacity to high school 8. Portables at Truman and Merit will be demolished 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations s!ngle and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 2lA and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2002/03 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single family units and multi-family units, which were constructed in the last five (5) years. - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family, and multi-family units based on King County Code 2lA and the Growth Management Act. Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months. Site Acquisition Costs is the per acre cost of the last school site purchased (site 85); this is a negotiated purchase price. Single Family Units Multi-Family Units Plan Year 2002/03 Plan Year 2001/02 Collection Year 2002/03 Collection Year 2001/02 $3,894. $2,616. $1,094. $ 896. 24 DEVELOPMENT ~Point Park 01 Woodbrook Divl ~at Star Lake .~.~_D ash Pointe (99)Greenfield Park ~Woods (98) Brookshire North ~.~.~_~to n e B too k (97) Southern Rose (97)Grouse Pointe Total FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCIIOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PI~AN STUDENT GENERATION NEW CONSTRUCTION IN PRIOR 5 YEARS Number of I Number of Single Family [ Multi-Family 12 [ 0_. 26 [ 0 29 27 111 21 120 30 Single Family Student Generation Number of Elementary Students 2 12 6 11 7 21 7 34 12 7 Number of Middle School Students 3 15 2 4 2 8 3 35 6 7 450 0 119 85 Number of Senior High Students 9 8 2 3 1 14 4 37 6 11 Elementary Student Factor 0.1667 0.2449 0.2308 0.3793 0.2593 0.1892 0.3333 0.2833 0.4800 0.2333 Middle School Student Factor 0.2500 0.3061 0.0769 0.1379 0.0741 0.0721 0.1429 0.2917 0.2400 0.2333 95 Senior High Student Factor 0.7500 · 0.1633 0.0769 0.1034 0.0370 0.1261 0.19O5. 0.3083 0.2400 0.3667 Total Student Factor 1.1667 . 0.7143 0.3846 0.62O7 0.3704 0.3874 0.6667 0.8833 0.9600 0.8333 Student Generation Multi-Family Student Generation DEVELOPMENT Sad~rook ~ Number of Single Family I Dwelin g s----~ 0 Number of Number of Multi-Family Elementary Dwellin_~_[ Students 2--'~ Jr 13 8 488 36 Number of tNumber°f Middle School Senior High Students Students 13 11 9 10 3 8 25 29 Elementary Student Factor 0.0542 0.0704 0.2286 Middle School Student Factor 0.0542 0.0423 0.0857 Senior High Student' Factor 0.0458 0.0469 0.2286 Total Student Factor 0.1542 0.1596 0.5429 25 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN School Site Acquisition Cost: Elementary t Middle School IMPACT FEE '- · . Stddent Student Facility Cost / Facility Factor Factor 'Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR b. O0 $0 '436 0.2644 0.0738 $0 $0 21.80 $87,747 706 0.1889 0.0512! $512 $139 41.20 $82,733 1,558 0.2111 0.0594 $462 $130 Federal Way Public Acacdemy-.6 of 3 acre parcel TOTAL $974 $269 Sr High Middle School Sr High Federal Way Public Acacdemy - .4 of 3 acre parcel School Construction Cost: Elementary ~.Middle School 2Sr High Middle School 2 Sr High Student Student % Perm Fac./ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR 9d. 12% $0 '436 0.2644 0.0738 $0 $0 96.12% $17,687,100 70~ 0.1889 0.0512 $4,549 $1,233 96.12% $44,991,400 1,558 0.2111 0.0594 $5,860 $1,649 Additional Seconda~ Capacity - $15,400,000 - Capacity 490 TOTAL $10,408 $2,882 Federal Way Public Academy - $2,4001 $2,287,100 New Senior High - $43.800,000 - Capacity 1414 Federal Way Public Academy - $1,600.1 S l, 191,400 Temporary Facility Cost: Elementary Middle School Sr High Student Student % Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR 2.88% $0 25 0.2644 0.0738 $0 $0 3.88% $79,695 49 0.1889 0.0512 $12 $3 3.88% $0 23 0.2111 0.0594 $0 $0 TOTAL $12 $3 State Matching Credit Calculation: Elementary Middle School New Sr High Student Student Boeck Cost/ Sq. Ft. State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR $110.32 80 0.00% 0.2644 0.0738 $0 $0 $110.32 110 0.00% 0.1889 0.0512 $0 $0 $ 110.32 120 60.9 l% 0.2111 0.0594 $1,702 $479 Total $1,702 $479 Tax Payment Credit Calculation Average Assessed Value (April 2002) Capital Bond Interest Rate (May 2002) Net Present Value of Average Dwelling Years Amortized Property Tax Levy Rate Present Value of Revenue Stream Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost Permanent Facility Cost Temporary Facility Cost State Match Credit Tax Payment Credit Sub-Total 50% Local Share Ilmpact Fee Single Family Multi-Fanfily Residences Residences SFR MFR $188,430 $48,281 5.19% 5.19% $1,441,674 $369,397 $1.32 $1,32 __ $__L903 $488 $ 974 $ 269 $ 10,408 $ 2,882 $ 12 $ 3 $ (1,702) $ (479) $ (1.903) $ (488) $ 7,789 $ 2,187 $ 3,894 $ 1,094 $ 3,894 $ 1,1194J 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FRoM THE 2001/0'2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2002/03 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2001/02 Plan and the 2002/03 Plan are listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY - UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY Site 82 is added. This is a small piece of property not sold when the rest of the site was sold. This site was not shown in previous Capital Facility Plans NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES Permanent capacity for Federal Way Public Academy is added. SIX YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2002/2007 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL F~CILITIES PLAN SECTION 1]I - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Elementary school capacity reflects the change in average class size, K through 2nd grade at 20 and 3 through 6th grade at 25. The average capacity of senior high schools is increased from 1372 to 1414. This change is a result of analysis of current building use and programs in place for the 2001/02 school year. Building Program Capacities are found on page 13. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portab!e Locations can be found on page 15. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2002 through 2007. The new forecast reflects a decreased rate of growth. Enrollment History and Projections are found on page 18. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 2lA The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2002/03 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2001/02 TO 2002/03 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2002/03 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments. Student allocation is also changed to reflect the middle school configuration. The Student General worksheet is found on page 25. IMPACT FEE Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities Percent Temporary Facilities 96.56 to 96.12% 3.44% to 3.88% Report #30SPI Updated portable inventory Temporary Facility Cost $68,005. to $79,695. Updated cost of most recently purchased portables Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft $103.55 to $110.32 Change per OSPI State Match Average Assessed Value Capital Bond Interest Rate Property Tax Levy Rate 61.74% to 60.91% SFR - $176,267 to $188,430 MFR- $49,627 to $48,281 5.25% to 5.19% $1.46 to $1.32 Change per OSPI Per Puget Sound Educational Service District (ESD 121) Market Rate King County Treasury Division 29 CITY OF~ DATE: TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: July 15, 2002 Eric Faison, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee Paul A. Bucich, P.E., Surface Water Manag~,5~.~ David H. N~~Manager Near Term Action Agenda for Salmon Habitat Conservation BACKGROUND As an active member of the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Forum, the City of Federal Way participated in development of the Near Term Ac{ion Agenda (NTAA) for Salmon Habitat Conservation. The Steering Committee of the Watershed Forum formally adopted the Action Agenda on March 14, 2002. Recommendations in the document are voluntary for each participating jurisdiction. Jurisdictions will be asked to report back to the Watershed Steering Committee annually on Action Agenda implementation. The Near Term Action Agenda is a guide to decision making and action by local governments, businesses, community and environmental groups, and citizens. It identifies the types of projects, policies, programs, practices, and studies that have potential for benefiting salmon in the Green/Duwamish Watershed and can be used by local jurisdictions and other organizations in setting resources protection priorities over the next two to four years. In many cases, descriptions of actions are focused on outcomes so that governments and other institutions can decide the most effective method for implementation given the particular circumstances. In other cases, where one approach to implementation is clearly superior, actions are described in detail. The NTAA recommends actions for implementation over the next 5 years to help restore and protect habitat for Chinook salmon and bull trout, which were listed as threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act in 1999. The recommendations are based on the current scientific understanding of salmon use and habitat conditions in the watershed. Text in the NTAA clearly identifies the expected benefit to salmon and explains how the action is linked to the interim scientific "strategy" for salmon recovery in this watershed. The Action Agenda focuses on salmon habitat since local governments have authority and responsibility for much of the habitat in the watershed. Hatchery management, harvest, and dams are not addressed in the document. These issues are being addressed in other forums. While the document only covers that portion of the city ~vithin the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watersheds (generally north of S 312"* Street), many of the action items are applicable throughout the City. The Near Term Action Agenda is a precursor to development of the watershed Salmon Habitat Plan. The Salmon Habitat Plan will guide long-term habitat conservation and recovery actions in thc watershed. Federal Way will continue to participate in development of this plan, ~vhich is expected to be completed in 2005. Once completed, the Salmon Habitat Plan can be included in broader salmon recovery plans for the entire Puget Sound region. The following attachments provide an overview of the Action Agenda and the City of Federal Way's response: 1. Cover letter from Dwight Pelz, King County Council member and Watershed Steering Committee Chair 2. Support letter from Steve Mullet, Mayor of Tukwila and Watershed Forum Chair 3. Chapter One of the Action Agenda giving an introduction to the document. 4. Figure 3 from the document of a conceptual illustration of a watershed, with specific goals for each subbasin. 5. Pages A41-43 from Appendix A highlighting current activities to protect and restore endangered Chinook and bull trout in .the City of Federal Way. 6. Matrix of each recommendation action from the document with the City of Federal Way's plan for implementation. RECOMMENDATION At this time, them is no action necessary by the Land Use and Transportation Committee. The Surface Water Management Division is informing the Committee of Federal Way's participation in implementation of the Near Term Action Agenda. Staff has identified many opportunities for implementation of the Near Term Action Agenda in Federal Way. Some of the actions are already happening and some will be additional efforts over the next five years. The Action Agenda calls for identification of a point person to coordinate implementation efforts and communicate with the Watershed Steering Committee. Staff, with the Surface Water Management Division, will provide this point person. As part of the annual reporting of the Action Agenda implementation, staff will return to the Committee early next year to report on progress of these identified action items. A final first year report will be submitted to the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Steering Committee in March 2003. AI'I'ROVAL OF COMMITTEE REI'ORT: Eric Faison, Chair Michael Park, Me~nber Dean McColgan, Me~nber PB:dl cc: Project File Day File k:\lutcX2OO2Xsalmon habitat conservation.doc WATER AND Algona Auburn Black Diamond Burien Covington Des Moines EnumcJaw Federal Way Kent King County Maple Valley Normandy Park Renton SeaTac Seattle Tacoma Tukwila RESOURCE INVENTORY AREA 9 (WR May 2002 IA 9) FORU Dear WRIA 9 Local Governments, Tl~e WRIA 9 Forum of local governments acknowledges receipt of the Near-Term .dction ,4genda for salmon habitat conservation for the GreeWDuwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed (WRIA 9) and commends the WRIA 9 Steering Committee for this valuable document. The Forum thanks the Steering Committee, its various cormnittees, and members of the public [br their efforts on the NT,4A. The Forum particularly appreciates the effort by the Steering Committee to identify priority actions that are both doable and certain to benefit sahnon. This practical, science-based focus maximizes the likelihood that each member government will find recommendations in the NT,4,4 that it can and will carry out over the next 2-4 years The Forum will encourage each jurisdiction to use the Nea/'-l'erm ,4ction ,4genda to inform or guide its actions that afl, ct or focus on salmon habitat conservation. The Fotxm~ will also encourage each jurisdiction to: Fully review the NT.4/t; Identify those WRIA-wide and subwatershed actions that are relevant to its activities; · Determine when and how to implement those actions, looking for opportunities to carry out actions cooperatively where feasible, efficient, and desirable: · Carry out those actions in the next 2-4 years as resources allow; and · Participate in thc annual reporting on implementation to the WRIA 9 Steering Committee. To accomplish these recommendations, Watershed Coordination Services staff will be available to brief councils and/or staffon the NT,4A upon request. Once again, wc wish to thank the Steering Committee for thc Near-Te/'m ,4c/ion ,4genda fbr sahnon habitat conservation and we encourage each member government to act on its recommendations. Sincerely, Steve Mullet, Chair, WRI/\ 9 Forum Mayor, City of Tukwila WATER ANO RESOU.RCE INVENTORY May 2002 Auburn Burien Covington Kent King County Normandy Park Itenton Seattle Tukwila Port of Seatlle Covington Water District King Conservation District Tacoma Public Utilities U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington Department of Ecology Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Washington Department of Natural Resources Washington [nvironmental Council 6reen/Duwamish Watershed Alliance Trout Unlimited The Boeing Company Plum Creek Timber Company Master Builders Association South County Chambers of Commerce Coalition King County Agricultural Commission King County Livestock Oversight Committee AREA 9 (WRIA 9) STEERING COMMITTEE Dear Salmon Conservation Partner: On behalf of thc Grecn/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound (WRIA 9) Steering Committee, [ am pleased to send you this Near- Term Action/-lget?da (NT/L4) for sahnon habitat conservation in our COUNTY - watershed. It is our hope that our local government parmers will usc this ,~genda to help protect and restore salmon habitat in our watershed. Tile NT, q,4 recommends projects, policies, programs, practices, and studies for WRIA 9 that have a high potential for benefiting salmon. Actions arc focused on chinook salmon and bull trout, which were listed as threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act in 1999. The NT/I.,t Js thc result of t'our years of collaborative efforts and one year of sustained discussion among elected officials, city and county staff', business and cnvironmcn- iai groups, scientists, and concerned citizens. Its recommendations arc based on the scientific foundation of the WRIA 9 Habitat Limitin¢ Factors and Reconnaissance Assessment Report (December 2000). This N7~,t/t provides guidance for sahnon habitat conservation in our watershed while we work on a long-term Comprehensive Sahnon Conservalion Plan. Thc NT~L4 f'ocuscs on habitat. Of course, loss and degradation of habitat arc only some of' (be factors contributing to thc decline of salmon. Hatchery management, harvest, and dams also arc important and arc being addressed in other forums. However, as local governments and citizens, wc have thc authority and responsibility for much of thc habitat in our watershed. By' doing our parl, v,.'c will ccmtribute to larger, regional ct'forts to recover threatened species of salmon. We selected aclions for the NT~4.4 using two key principles: · Are we confident that thc action will help sahnon? · Is tile action c/oab/e in thc next 2-4 years'? Tile resulting list of actions is not a catalog of every good idea that could bc done: rather, it is a list el'priority actions that we think can be done. Each jurisdiction will decide how to implement tile recommendations of the Ncr~r-Te/vu /h:tio/t .,tge~t~kt. We believe community/environmental groups also will continue to play an important role and the NE4/t identifies actions where their involvement will be particularly helpful. To track progress, thc Steering Committee is asking local govcmmcnts and other implcmcnlcrs to report annually on steps taken to carry out thc recommendations of this document. Wc look tb]'ward to working xvith you in thc years ahead as we implement this iX"drtr-l~wtn .,lotion ~tgcnd¢~ Ibc sahnon habitat conservation. Sincerely. Financial support provided by signers of Watershed Planning Interlo¢ol Agreement for WRIA 9 including: Al9ono, /luburn, Block Diamond, 8urien, Covington, Des Moines, £numclaw, Federal Way, Kent, King (aunty, Maple Valley, Normandy Park, Renton, Sea,ar, Seattle, racoma, rukwila . Chapter I-Introduction Chapter 1. Introduction Chinook sahnon and bull trout have been listed under the Endangered Species Act as threatened in the Puget Sound region~. Population numbers are declining, formerly available habitat has been blocked, and the remaining habitat--habitat on which all sahnon species depend for survival--is losing the complex structure needed to keep the population fit and offer adaptive alternatives. Once designated as ttT/'eate/~ed or e/~da/~gerecl, a species and its habitat are protected by federal law. While the Puget Sound region and individual planning units (called Water Resource Inventory Areas or WRIAs) develop long-term strategies for people to better co- exist with sahnon, many of the WRIAs have been coordinating voluntary efforts to identify and undertake actions that will help sahnon in the short-tenn. This Near-Term Action Agenda is one such effort. In this report, the word salmo/~ refers to all native species of salmon, steelhead, trout, and bull trout/Dolly Varden char. The WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Conservation Planning Process The Near-Term Action Agenda has been developed by the Steering Committee, which was created to direct sahnon conservation efforts in one of the Puget Sound basin planning units, Water Resource Inventory (WRIA) 9. WRIA 9 consists of the Greet~'Duwamish and Central Puget Sound watersheds2 (Figure 1). The WRIA 9 Steering Committee was established in 1998 and consists of representatives fi-om local, state, and federal governments, the environmental community, and businesses in the WRIA (a complete list of Steering Committee participants is provided at the beginning of this document). The WRIA 9 Steering Committee has three subcommittees that helped create the Near-Term Action Agenda: the Planning Work Group, the Technical Committee, and the Public Outreach Work Group. The Planning Work Group first developed and refined many of the ideas in the Near-Term Action Agenda. The Technical Committee and the Public Outreach Work Group also developed some of the studies and actions that are part of this Action Agenda. The WRIA 9 Forum is a cattcus of local governments represented by elected officials fi-om thc 16 jurisdictions within the WRIA~. These jurisdictions have an interlocal agreement to ~ In March 1999, thc National Marine I:ishcrics Service listed Puget Sound chinook salmon as a "threatened" species under the Endangered Species Act. In November 1999, thc U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed bull trout as z~ "threatened" species under the Endangered Species Act. 2 Please see Chapter 2 for a complete dclSnitiol~ of WRIA 9. ~ Thc 16 governments that participate in this intcrlocal agreement arc thc cities of Algona, Auburn, lMack Dian~ond. Burien, Covington, Des Moincs, l~numclaw, Federal Way, Kent, Maple Valley, Normandy Park. Rcnton, ScaTac, Seattle, and Tukwila, al~d King County. In addition, thc City of 3-acon~a signed thc intcrlocal agrcc~cnt in 2001 will add its l~nancial supfx>rt to thc WI~IA 9 planning process bcgin~ing in 2002. WIRIA 9 Near-Term Action Agenda I Chapter I-Introduction participate in the WRIA 9 salmon habitat conservation and recovery planning process and contract with King County to provide a small cost-shat'cd stafff. WI(IA 9 planning also supported financially by thc [,cad IDatity Operational Grant Progran~ administered by thc Washington State Department ot' Fish and Wildlil~. WRIA 9 has dcvcloped a £om--task approach to the salmon habitat conservation challenges it f'accs. Two tasks culminate in scientific reports and two concludc with action plans. Habitat LimitittA, Factorx attd Recotmaixsa¢tce Assessmettt Rel~ort. The Reco~z~,r~i.v.vr~ce M.s'xe.,'.¥me~l was completed in December 2000. This scientil~c report brings together cxisting information on conditions of salmon and salmon habitat in WI~IA 9 both IS'om the scientific literature and fi'om local knowledge and expertise. It i(tcntilics important problems and factors that contribute to sztlmon decline and includes maps showing the distribution ot'salmon, by species. throt~ghoutWI~lAg, lt also highlights curvcnt gaps in data and technical unctcvstanding. It is available on-linc ~)://d m'. metvol<c.~ov/Wvias/O./Tcchn ical Rcpovt s,'Tcc h n ica I Report s. btm. The Reco/¢~¢r¢i.v.vr¢~c'e A.v.ve.s'.vme~! is SUl0plcmcntcd by a similar report, COlnl)lctcd in 2001, that provides inlbrmation on thc marine nearshore ecosystem of Pugct Sound. Thc Rer:o¢¢¢¢rti.v.va/¢r'r, ?l.v.vr,.v.v/¢¢~,~/ Of /Dc, ,q'/r¢lr' o/'l/~e /Vr,r¢¢'.v/lo~'(¢ E~'o.5l'.v[~,/~ ~-cpovt is ~ :.'/d n v. ~ ~cl rol<c, uov/w [u,'xx ~ttc ~'sh ctl%: D u ~c~ 'nc:t rxhorc/$on v. Strat~,.g, ic/txsesxme~tt. Thc Stvatogic Asscssmc~t will build on int~)vmation i~ thc It will involve research to fill important inlbrmation ,gal,S, in particular those concerning thc health ol'chinook salmon ;mcl bt~ll tvottt. It will vcsu.lt in a moro salmtm and salmon habitat conscvvation and recovery, with a Focus on thc species listed as threatened trader thc lkctcral l!~dal~gCt-Cd Species Act. Thc Strategic Assessment will bo shaped by thc issuos that nccd lo be addressed in thc dcvclopmont offtho Comprehensive Salmon Conservation Plan and will provide 2 WRIA 9 Nea~'-Te~'m Act/on Age~d~'~ RSHORE NEARSNORE~,~ SUSWATERSH£D ; King County County WRIA 9 Boundary .,'atershed Boundary '-' . - Road Urban Growth Area River Open Water In~orpor..lted Area , Chapter 1-1ntr° duction Cotnprehensi,e Salmon Conservation Plan. The Comprehensive Salmon Conservation Phm will guide long:term habitat conservation and recovery actions in the watcrstmd and is the ultinlate product of the WRIA 9 planning process. A key component of the Conservation Plan will bo an apl, roach for adaptive management that will allow decisiola-makers to respond to the ever-deepening understanding of sahnon habitat needs and opportunities for ilnproving habitat in the WRIA. The WRIA 9 Steering Committee will guide development of the Conservation Plan during the period fi-om 2002 to 2005, with the goal of completing the Conservation Plan in 2005. It can then be included by tiao National Marine Fisheries Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (or a designated state agency) in the broader sahnon recovery plans for the entire Puget Sound region. Salmon Conservation Planning in the Puget Sound Region %almon conservation phmning similar to that occurring in WRIA 9 is also underway in nearby WRIAs. In addition, three oFthe most pol~ulous cotmtios in tho Puget Sound region gl~ohomish, King, and Pierce~have coordinated their planning fur salmon habitat recovery through tho Tri-County Endangered Species Act Response. Thc Tri-County of tuft brings together local govcrmncnts, environmental gr()ups, and businesses to address thc t~fl)itat-rclatcd 15toters ol'sahnon decline, eno clement of'thc Tri-County I;SA Response is WRl.,k-lcvcl habitat conservation phinning. Individual \VILLA and Tri-County salmon habitat conservation phtm~ing is OXl)CCtCd to t'ccct into thc development ol'a broader Puget Sound-wide Shin-cd Strategy. Thc l'ugct Sound Shared Strategy will attempt to create a Puget Sound-wide salmon recovery plan that ties together harvest management, hatchery practices, and habitat protection and foster,trion. Tho el'lin'ts of \VRIA 9, along with those of other \VRIAs in the Puget Sound m-ca, will inlbrm and be inlbrmcd by thc Shared Strategy. Ultimately, however, it is thc National Marine Fisheries Service and thc U.S. [:ish and Wildlife Scl-vice that will develop the official recovery plan for the whole Puget Sound region. That recovery plan will set numeric and other goals lbr recove,-y and fl~c critc,'i~ tbr success, which is thc dclisting oFchinook salmon and bull t,'out as threatened t,nctcr tho I'h~d;mgcrcd 5;petits Act. Role of the Near-Term Action Agenda Tho Ncar-Tcrtn Action Agenda lbr\VRIA9rccommcndsonlysoloctcd:lctions. It isitnota compcnditm~ (>Fall actions that could bonctit 5ahllon. Actions included in this Ncar-'l'crm Action Agenda moot both of thc lbllowing criteria: nccd For ;~dditiomtl studies to (tcmonstralc benefit, and WRIA 9 Near-Term Action Agenda 5 Chapter I-Introduction The action is feasible and can be implemented in the next two to four years as. resources are identified, without extensive changes in existing social and institutional frameworks (defined as doable actions by the Steering Committee). Actions that do not meet these criteria ultimately may be needed to recover threatened salmon. Such actions will be considered and possibly proposed as the Comprehensive Sahnon Conservation Plan is developed. Readers should keep in mind this distinction between the Near- Term Action Agenda and the Comprehensive Sahnon Conservation Plan. The Near-Term Action Agenda is a guide to decision-making and action by local governments, businesses, community and environmental groups, and citizens. It identifies the types of projects, policies, programs, practices, and studies that have a high potential for benefiting sahnon in WRIA 9 and can be used by local jurisdictions and other organizations in setting resource protection priorities over the next two to four years. In many cases, descriptions of actions are focused on outcomes so that governments and other institutions can decide the most effective method for implementation given the particular circumstances. In other cases, where one approach to implementation is clearly superior, actions are described in detail. Consequently, readers will note differences in the level of specificity of actions. The Near-Term Action Agenda is not meant to be a static document. Of necessity, it is a snapshot based on what is known at the present time. As more is learned about sahnon and their habitat needs in WRIA 9, other actions may assume greater priority. The final chapter of the Near-Term Action Agenda suggests a silnple process to respond to new actions resulting from better understanding of tile WRIA. The Near-Term Action Agenda is not a compilation of all potentially beneficial actions. As more is learned about the connection between conservation actions and healthier sahnon populations, other actions that were not identified in the Near-Term Action Agenda may emerge as equally ilnportant. This document should not be construed as a reason to reject other actions that careful consideration suggests will benefit listed sahnon species. Local governments in WRIA 9 (the 15 cities and King County) expect to take the lead in carrying out many of the provisions of the Near-Term Action Agenda during the period from 2002 to 2005. Other state and federal agencies, Tacoma Public Utilities, community and environmental groups, businesses, and citizens also have important roles to play in pursuing actions in support of sahnon habitat improvements. Tile Near-Term Action Agenda is the result of sustained commitlnent and intensive collaboration by the various stakeholders on tile WRIA 9 Steering Comlnittee and its subconmfittees. An even greater level ofcolnmitment and collaboration will be required to transform the ideas presented on these pages into a reality between noxv and 2005. Tile actions m the Near-Term Action Agenda, if successfully catTied out, will advance the \¥RIA toward tile goal of sufficient high- quality habitat to support salmon recovery in the Green/Duwamisb and Central Puget Sound watershed. 6 WRIA 9 Near-Term Action Agenda B4, uef[l~hin~}okarld bull trout, © U'2'/', M I SH HOWARD HANSON DAM WATER -,~ °'~°2~~' (~ Krng County IHCREASE ABUNDANCE, PRODUC11V TY 'ERS TY. AND DISTRIBUTION Appendix A--Activiti~ by WRIA 9 Jurisdictions City of Federal Way Efforts to Recover Sahnon lIabitat Population: 83,890 (2001 est.) (split between WRIA 9 and WRIA I0) Incorporated: 1990 21.5 square miles in the Nearshore and Lower Green River subwatersheds Land Use and Riparian Conditions Programs and Expertise: In 2001, Federal Way reviexved current policies, progralns and practices to determine their relationship to salmon protection. The city has staff with special expertise to work with developers as they respond to salmon recovery issues, Federal Way offers incentives to private landowners who protect or restore habitat voluntarily. These incentives include strearnlined permitting for those including salmon recovery or protectiou efforts in their projects and reduced fees if the developer goes beyond standards. Bq/'fers wM Habitat: Buffers are required on sahnon-bearing streams and wetlands depending on the particular classification of the stream or shoreline. Classification Sahnon bearing streams Other streams Salmon bearing xvctlands Other wetlands Buffer Width 100 feet through State Environlnental Policy Act 50 feet minimum 200 feet 25-100 feet Federal Way has a program to acquire and recover sahnon habitat. Stormwater and Water Quality Conslruc[ion Regulotion: The city inspects coustruction sites frcqnently (more than five times during construction) for the control of erosiou and sedimentation. Inspectors have the authority to hah work and issue fines. Staff members are sent to WSDOT training on erosion and sedimentation control and arc given the opportunity to attend local aud national meetings of the International Erosion Control Association. The Surface Water Managemel~t division provides training to building inspectors so that they can ensure that erosion control measures arc working properly. Federal Way provides handouts to single-family residential contractors on erosion sediment control practices, and holds pre-construction meetings with WRIA 9 Near-Term Action Agenda A-4 1 Appendix A--Activities by WRIA 9 Jurisdictions all contractors in which erosion and sediment control are discussed. On-site private inspectors arc required for development as at State ILnvironmental Policy Act conciition. activities, development and herbicide use, arc controllect and the city has a very comprehensive spill response program that includes all public works field employees and fire anti police personnel as well. Federal Way is involvect in the Green/Duwamish Ecosystem Restoration Project. Federal Way collects data on water quality including temperature, pt f, conductivity, turbidity and dissolved oxygen. Water quality complaints arc investigated and rel~rrals given; information on control off pollutants is available to businesses and residents. S/or, re'a/er Regtdation.sv The city has adopted and uses the 1998 King County stormwaler manual modified to fit Federal Way needs. Thc city applies three flow control levels, depending on the facility and stream afl,croci. A&d,/c~cmce." Federal Way is respolasible tbr maintaining city-owned stormwator thcilitics throe times a year. The city also inspects any llCW singlc-ffamily I~lcilitics, alld olctcr ones that arc transl~rmd to thc city. Private owners arc responsible tbr maintaining their own 2~cilitics, usually biannually. Fines can be levied iF private owners do not maintain their fiicilitics. Also, Federal Way oft~rs private owners the Opl~ortunity to apply for reduced stu'l~ce-water management IDes il'they naaintai~ their IElcililics properly. Ste~vardship Federal Way olTcrs classes and xvorl~shotas on salmo]a-fi'icnctly activities (these arc ol'lDrcd tl~rou,,hm thc Stream Team) and expects to soon hire a person to omanize~ green ~arclcnin~ programs. Federal Way also oft~rs compost bins at reduced ratcs, and has a strong recycling program. Nearshore Activities Bull<heads, riprap, docks, and piers are rogulatcct. Setbacks arc required from shorelines and blul)~. Those ctqacnd on land usc, thc critical areadcsignation, zoning, and lot size. The State Environmental Policy Act process can be used to increase buffers and setbacks; thc typical baseline bufl~r is 50 to 75 [~ct. Federal Wav czm ol'l)r assistance and guidance to those who must I/lilllilgC StOFIIlXViltCI' ill blulTarc:~5. I:catL[rCS Particular to Cilv Federal Way is at the lbreli'ont of SlOFIII\\',:IIcF planning and implementation [(cology lbr its cl'lbz'~s in 199S. ,.\-.12 WP, IA 9 Near-Term Action Agenda Appendix A--Activiti~.s by WRIA 9 Jurisdictions Federal Wayhas updated and produced a detailed Water quality protection map displaying standards to be met in different parts of the city. This aid is available to staff and developers and is posted in the permitting division. Notable Projects Stream stabilization and habitat enhancement programs along the south fork of Lakota Creek Stream stabilization and habitat enhancement along the east fork of Lakota Creek. WRIA 9 Near-Term Action Agenda A-43 Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Near Term Action Agenda DRAFT City of Federal Way Planned Implementation Activities July 5, 2002 Action Action Dcscription Federal Way's hnplementation Timeframe Number i Watershed Wide Actions ~ WXVl Develop an inventory of currently productive fish Participate in Nearshore General Investigation 2002-2007 ~ [ habitat based on tine Reconnaissance Assessment and [ ~ additional rescau'da, and identify the habitat-ibrnaing ~ processes associated with that habitat ' WW2 Protect habitat nnd habitat-forming processes Lakota Creek stabilization project 2002-2003 ', identified in WWI or where other efforts have Dumas Bay upland riparian area restoration 2002 ~ idcnti fled important habitat iWW3 Determine Ifslx usc and habitat priorities within Coordinate with NS Study 1, NS1, NS2. and 2003 ~ , jt,'isclictions WW19 j Xk"Xk'4 Apply existing incentives (and where necessary, Public Benefit Rating System available to Oneoing I develop new incentives) tbr protection oF salmon land owners habitat in WI<IA 9. W~k~5 Iclentit3, existing educational and outreach materials Participate in Public Outreach Work Group Ongoing For promoting salmon conservation messages and Develop salmon restoration web page 2003 make them available for use by all on a website or on loan. WW6 IEncourage people to contribute personally to salmon Solid Waste Division coordination with King 2003-2004 conservation through high-visibility, enticing County activities. outreach efforts t'ocused on the theme of lawn and Coordinate additional ef}brts xvithin the city. 2003-2007 ~ [ ~arden care. ' I I Gree~/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Near Term Action Agenda DRAFT City of Federal Way Planned Implementation Activities - continued Action Action Description Federal Way's Implementation Timeframe Number WW7 Improve enforcement of existing regulations that Evaluate root causes of water enforcement 2002-2003 protect salmon and salmon habitat issues. Develop and implement water quality Ongoing ' inspection and enforcement program. Promote complaint hotline through web site Ongoing and publications WW8 Evaluate adequacy of existing regulations to protect Implement GAP study recommendations :2003-2004 riparian buffers and improve them where necessary to maintain functions that protect fish habitat WW9 Promote the use of alternative shoreline protection Shoreline BMP video on city TV channel Annually techniques Reproduce and distribute shoreline stewards 2003-2004 handbook Educate applicants on alternative shoreline Ongoing techniques WW10 Evaluate and improve erosion and sediment control Hire erosion control inspector to assist 2003-2004 programs to reduce sediment entering salmon- construction inspectors bearing streams WW11 Adopt stormwater standards that protect salmon Conduct low impact development assessment 2002-2004 and promote strategies approved by council , Review amended King County storm water 2003-2004 manual when available and make necessary changes to Federal Way WW12 Develop programs and protocols for the maintenance Private stormwater facility inspection already Ongoing of stormwater systems and facilities to reduce entry occurring. Additional staff requested for of sediment and other pollutants to salmon streams 2003-2004 Maintenance of public stormwater facilities Ongoing already occurring ©rccn/Duwamish ancl Central Puget Sound Near Term Action Agenda DRAFT City oF Vocteral Way Planned Implementation Activities - continued Action Number \V\\'I 4 \V\\"I 5 W W 16 \V\V17 \V\VI 8 Action Description Review road maintenance practices and adopt written operating proccciures to reduce potential impacts to salmon and xtlmon habitat , Review parl<s and grounds maintenance procedures and adopt written best management practices tlmt protect salnnon and salmon habitat Develop a comprclnensive, \Vl2.1A-wide process to identify, develop, and prioritize projects tlnat benefit salmon and carry out the WRIA 9 strategy. Create combined naturalist and stewardship activities across WRIA 9 l~ncOUl'age thc restoration of riparian buI'l'ers Innplement l'laa/se 1 ot'tlne iL{cosystena Restoration Project Federal Way's Implementation implement Tri-County Regional Road Maintenance Program and seek 4(d) coverage \Vork wittn Parks and Solid Waste to implement Integrated Pest Management \Vork with tile Planning Work ©roup to implement Timeframe incorporate ellbrts being funded by King Conservation District program and otlners inspection private storm water facilities for invasive plants Control invasive plants at storm water Ongoing detention ponds Worl< wittn comnaunity groups and Ongoing lnorneowners to restore and maintain buffers Ongoing Consider easements fbr riparian buffers to comt01cmcnt current regulations Continue to support l)evclop stream and lake stexvarctslnip 2002-2003 programs. 2003-2007 I 2003-2005 ] 2002-2007 Ongoing Ongoing 2002-2004 Continue to work with existing educational partners (Friends of Hylebos Wetlands, Sclnool District. Hylebos Watershed Action Committee. otlner volunteers, etc.) 2003 Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Near Term Action Agenda DRAFT City of Federal Way Planned Implementation Activities - continued Action Action Description Federal Way's Implementation Timeframe Number WW19 Evaluate fish passage barriers at the local jurisdiction Pierce County Conservation District Culvert Complete level Inventory (1999) Nearshore Actions NS 1 Restore nearshore, Elliot Bay/Duwamish, and Lower Assist Parks Department on restoration of 2002-2003 Green River habitats Dumas bay shoreline NS2 Support the Puget Sound Nearshore General Support through WRIA 9 Forum Ongoing Investigation NS Study Conduct nearshore habitat baseline mapping Work with WP, IA 9 Technical Committee. 2002-2'007 1 Coordinate study with WW3 and WW9. 4 CITY OF~__~ DATE: TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: July 15, 2002 Eric Faison, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee Paul A. Bucich, Surface Water Manage),~J~ David H. Mo~er t~-- ~ West Hylebos Creek Gravel at South 373ra Street BACKGROUND Hylebos Creek at S 373rd Street has historically been a problem gravel deposition zone resulting in overtopping of S 373rd Street and flooding of surrounding land. Flooding occurred twice during the winter of 2001/2, resulting in requests from adjoining property owners for maintenance of the channel. Surface Water Management evaluated the situation during the winter, and with the agreement of the community, agreed to hold off on gravel removal until Summer 2002. Due to delays in obtaining essential private property easements and state permits, the project was delayed in advertising to all contractors on the City's small works roster until late June. Photos of the project site are included in the attached package. The project consists of removing approximately 250 cubic-yards of gravel, diversion of flow, by-pass diversion of the creek around the construction site, and maintenance of erosion control measures during construction. The removal must be accomplished by August 31, 2002 as stipulated in the Washington State Department ofFish and Wildlife Hydraulic Project Approval Permit (HPA). Due in part to restrictions placed on the project in the HPA Permit, specifically the requirement for by-pass of the channel during construction, the resultant bids came in over $20,000. As a result, City Council approval is required in order to award the contract. To meet a construction schedule of this year, the project needs to be addressed during City Council Business at the July 16th, 2002 regular meeting. Five (5) bids were received and opened on July 3, 2002 at 2:00 p.m. for the West Hylebos Creek Gravel at South 373rd Street Project (see attached Bid Tabulation Summary). The lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Americon, Inc. with a total bid of $28,875.52, tax included. Reference checks on Americon, Inc. by City staff indicate that the contractor has performed similar work. As a result, City staff believes Americon, Inc. can successfully complete this project to the City's satisfaction. Therefore the lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Americon, Inc. in the amount of $28,875.52, tax included. PROJECT COST ESTIMATES Construction Low Bid l 0% Construction Contingency Design Construction Management Total Project Cost $ 28,875.52 $ 2,887.55 In house In house $ _}j~763.02 07/09/2002 LUTC memo - S. 364th Culvert Replacement Page 2 PROJECT FUNDING: Thc project will be funded by thc SWM small works CIP budget. RECOMMENDATION Staffrecommends placing the following items on the July 16, 2002 Council agenda for approval: 1. Award the project to Amcricon, Inc. the lowest responsive, responsible bidder in the amount of $28,875.52 and approve a 10% contingency of $2,887.55 for a total of $31,763.07. 2. Authorize thc City Manager to execute the contract. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: Eric Faison~ Chair Michael Park, Member Dean McColgan, Member PB:dl cc: Project File Day File K:~LUT('~2002,S 373rd Gravel Removal Bid A',,,ard.doc 3id Tabulation Yest Hylebos Gravel Removal at S 373rd Street 2002 ~IL1 1~11111~1 OUI~' ,.~ Bid 1 Bid 2' Bid 3 Bid 4 Bid'5 Americon R.W. Scott 4ordic Constrbction ESE Corp IICON Materials em A~nount Unit Unit Pric Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total · Unit Price Total .Unit PriceTotal 4obilization 1 LS 6100.00 $6,100.00 6550.00 $6,550.00 4595.00 ~$4,595.00 12795.00 $12,795.00 10000.00 $10,000'.00 'raffic Control 1 LS 2000.00 $2,000.00 3250.00 $3,250.00 920.00 i $920.00 5481.00 $5,481.00 4000.00 $4;000,00 !;tream Flow Diversion and Fish Relocation 1 LS 6200.00 $6,200.00 3200.00 $3,200.00 18390.00 $18,390.00 8163.00 $8,163.00 16000.00 $16,000.00 ;tream Excavation Including Haul 250 CY 35.00 $8,750.00 70.56 $17,640.00 91.90 $22,975.00 44.00 $11,000.00 85.00 $21,250.00 ;rushed Surfacing Top Course 9 CY 110.00 $990.00 60.00 $540.00 91.00 $819.00 221.00 $1,989.00 85.00 $765.00 Yater Pollution/Erosion Control 1 LS 2500.00 $2,500.00 1000.00 $1,000.00... 1188.00 $1,188.00 14154.00 $14,154.00 5000.00 $5,000.00 Sub Total $26,540.00 $32,180.00 Sale Tax 8.8% $2,335.52 $2,831.84 $4,302.06 $4,715.22 $5,017.32 Total Bid Amount (Attachment B) $28,875.52 $35,011.84 $53,189.06 $58,297.22 $62,032,32 Bid Signature (Attachment C) Bid Bond (Attachment D) Addendum received/used l\ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY C~TY OF~ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS S. 373rd ST. WEST HYLEBOS CREEK GRAVEL REMOVAL CANADA PROJECT SITE Lattilude: 47deg 16' 122" Longitude: 122deg 19' 48" City of Federal Way _~ VICINITY MAP MAP INDEX TO DRAWINGS SHEET NO DRAWING TITLE I TITLE SHEET, VICINITY MAP AND DRAWING INDEX 2 pLAN & PROFILE VIEW 3 CROSS-SECTIONAL VIEW DIRECTIONS From I-5 North or South take Exit 142B. Continue west onto State Route 18 which converts into S, 348th St. Take a left onto Pacific Highway S, Continue straigh{ approximately 1 3/4 of a mile. Turn left onto S. 373rd St.. project site is approximately 1/4 of a mile east. Beginning of Project Station 13-.04.2 322104-9014 ADmroxlmme Dra~n Field LOCation - Mr Chris Edwards PARCEL 322104-9062 Mr. Tom Cam 3De PARCEL 322104-9024 Tom Camube' =ARCEL q~22104-9110 Wetlands _End of Project Station 7+97.7 Ex~sI ng TOC of Bank S 3/3rd Street brdge Note Total estimated cut is 250 cu vd 12' CONC ~Proc )sed Gravel Remov;~ L~mtt 3mfm Dram CENTERLINE PROFILE OF HYLE8OS CREEK APRIL 2002 373rd Gravel Removal ~ / West Hylebos ~ek ~- CROSS-SECTIONAL VIEW S.373rd GRAVEL REMOVAL WEST HYLEBOS CREEK