LUTC PKT 02-21-2001 .......... : ,..;.:.=...=..: ~ . .==". ...... i ..... City Couo¢ili . · ........................... ,; ......... · ..........
::'i:'I::::'':;.: i'::.'.']'. :.': ' :': '""'~i'="':':!":':'"":://''';.''~:'';''' '.;.':Land useFrt~i~tiOn::'~tnittee:.:.::'.'~':!":;? :' ';:. i"! .t~j~i'ili.:?i~;::i;;:!'!'!.:.!i'..'.' ?'...'.'. ' .... ::::;
· ..,:.:.::... ~.":.. :~..,.,. , .... . '... . .":'.;]?.'.', :~?;:,: ..... .. :.:,......: ... :. .....~.i':..~,;..!.:,..:i:,:..;..'.. · .... · :....::::!:
'February 21, 2001:' :.~'i::';:~'.':~'..! "' '":"":" "' .' · ...!.!:.j.;:i.i?.;:..''' :!:;'''':::'' ....... ~":.i':!:::":;".::]. ".' :..!','-'i':"".'"i :'"City H;iI '.
" qt"ch be~'"":
'"' ':':?'; ' · ; ':' Coun am
'5:30 pm :.':::'.:... .. ~: "' :~:.;::;~.. .". .... : ..... . ......
2.
3.
4.
MEETING AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
Approval of Minutes of the 3anuary 22, 2001, Meeting
PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes)
BUSINESS ITEMS
A.
23rd Avenue South Road Improvements Action
Project (S. 316th-S. 324tr' Streets) - 100%
Design Approval/Authorization to Bid
Twin Lakes Neighborhood Traffic Safety Project Action
Salloum/10 min
Perez/I0 min
FUTURE MEETING AGENDA ITEMS
25% Nonconforming Street Issues
6. ADJOURN
Committee Members:
Dean McCo/gan
Jeanne Burbidge
Eric Faison
O'ty Staff:
Kathy McC/ung, D/rector, Community Development Services
Sandy L y/e, Administrative Assistant
253.661.4116
I:\LU-TRANS\February 21, 2001 LUTC AGN.doc
January 221 2001
5:30 pm
City of Federal Way
City CoUncil . ..
Council Chambers
MEETING SUMMARY
In attendance: Committee members Dean McColgan, Chair, Jeanne Burbidge, and Eric Faison; Deputy Mayor
Linda Kochmar; City Manager David Mosely; Interim Director of Community Development Services Kathy
McClung; Public Works Director Cary Roe; City Attorney Bob Sterbank; Deputy Public Works Director Ken
Miller; Principal Planner Greg Fewins; Senior Planner Jim Harris; Associate Planner Deb Barker; Senior
Engineering Plans Reviewer Jim Femling; Traffic Engineering Rick Perez; Assistant Traffic Engineer Hazem EI-
Assar; Administrative Assistant E. Tina Piety.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair McColgan called the meeting to order at 5:35 pm.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the December 18, 2000, meeting was approved as presented.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT
None.
4. BUSINESS ITEMS
Preliminary Plat of Meadowlane - A subdivision consisting of 10 single-family lots proposed in
the southwest portion of the City. There is one existing residence, which shall remain. Access
th rd th
will be from 35 Avenue SW via a new local access street (SW 343 Street/34 Avenue SW).
The new local access street will end in a temporary cul-de-sac, and is designed and proposed
to allow future connection to the existing SW 342n° Street, east of the site. Staff recommends
the LUTC forward to the City Council a recommendation approving the Meadowlane preliminary
plat with conditions, based on the findings and conclusions in the December 18, 2000, Hearing
Examiner Report. Chair McColgan asked for any public comment.
Ken Shattock, 34312 31~ Avenue SW- President, Grouse Pointe (Div. II) Homeowner's
Association. Members of his HOA are concerned that the property is not big enough to hold 10
new homes, but their main concern is the proposed street extension. They are concerned that
extending the street would mean taking developed residential property. They are also
concerned over the possible increase in traffic flow (especially from commuters taking a short-
cut). They are concerned for their children's safety, with the increase of traffic.
Scott Sharrow, engineer for the project, said he was available to answer any questions.
Mike Mi~Is, 3126 SW342nd Street - He is the father of a deaf child. He is very concerned over
the proposed street extension. He bought his house because it is on a dead end, and would
therefore, provided the protection of few cars. If the street goes through, he would have to keep
his son indoors, and possibly have to move to ensure his son's safety. The City has put up a
deaf child sign on his street. He asked if there are any other actions the City can take to help
protect his child if the street is extended. Chair McColgan asked the staff to research if there is
any way the City can help beyond the deaf child sign.
Discussion was held over whether the City could require installation traffic calming devices
(speed humps) on the new street as part of the conditions. Usually, traffic calming devices are
not installed until a need is proven. City Attorney Sterbank said the City could require them if it
is expected that future development would need them.
City Manager Moseley stated that there are no plans at this time to extend the street. Extension
would only occur with future development of the area, and that is entirely in the hands of the
property owners. They could come in next week with a proposed development, or it might n. ot
happen for 20 years. When future development is proposed is the time to discuss the issues of
the street extension.
It was moved/seconded/approved to forward to the City Council a recommendation approving
the Meadowlane preliminary plat with conditions, based on the findings and conclusions in the
December 18, 2000, Hearing Examiner Report.
Preliminary Plat of Star Lake Vista - There was no PUblic comment on this issue. A subdivision
of 18 single-family lots proposed in the northern part of the City. Access will be from South Star
Lake Road. Staff recommends the LUTC forward to the City Council a recommendation
approving the Star Lake Vista preliminary plat with conditions, based on the findings and
conclusions in the December 19, 2000, Hearing Examiner Report.
It was noted that one condition requires some lots with steep slopes provide additional
geotechnical information when they are developed. It was moved/seconded/approved to
forward to the City Council a recommendation approving the Star Lake Vista preliminary plat
with conditions, based on the findings and conclusions in the December 19, 2000, Hearing
Examiner Report.
Olympic View Neighborhood Traffic Safety Project - There was no public comment on this
issue. Proposal is to install five speed humps in the Olympic View Neighborhood. Staff
recommends the LUTC forward to the City Council a recommendation to approval installation of
five speed humps on 26th Avenue SW and 27th Avenue SW, south of SW 320t~ Street.
The City Council has adopted installation criteria for speed humps. According to a September
2000 traffic study, this project meets the criteria. On October 17, 2000, a meeting was held with
the neighborhood that concluded installation of five speed humps was in order to mitigate the
identified traffic problems. Ballots were sent to property owners and occupants within 600 feet of
the proposed speed hump locations. Over 50% responded, and approval rates were high.
The LUTC asked how speed humps were working in other neighborhoods of the City. Staff
responded that initially there is more noise from annoyed drivers, but this soon passes.
Generally, speeds are reduced by some three mph, and usually there is 10% traffic diversion
(some areas have experienced up to 50%). The FWSD and Metro Transit do not like speed
humps, but will put up with them. They do cause a drop in the FWFD response time (they lose
about 10 seconds per speed humps), so the City works closely with them to make as little
impact as possible. The speed humps will be designed like those in Celebration Park and will
cost approximately $2000 each.
It was moved/seconded/approved to forward to the City Council a recommendation to
approve installation of five speed humps on 26t~ Avenue SW and 27th Avenue SW, south of SW
320th Street.
509 Update - The state is proposing to extend 509 from where it ends (west of SeaTac) to I-5 at
210t~ Street. It will add collector/distributor lanes to I-5. It will impact the 272"d interchange.
Some issues with the current proposal is that it would remove a general purpose lane from I-5
and in order to exit at 272"d, vehicles would have to begin their move some four miles from the
interchange. There is a class I wetland near 272"d. The current proposal would come very close
to this wetland, and it may mean that the proposed in-line transit station could not be built.
312th Freeway Connection - Currently in the comprehensive plan, the plan is to extend 312th
over I-5. It has been proposed that the City pursue an interchange. Staff figures it would cost
some $20 million for the extension, and another $50 million for an interchange. WSDOT has
specific criteria for interchanges and staff has done some research into the issue. One issue is
that the City must show that it meets all relevant comprehensive plans, not just the City's.
Another issue is that it is only ~ mile from the 320th interchange and WSDOT prefers at least
two miles between interchanges. The City could argue that is unrealistic in a city of this size.
WSDOT says it would take some 10 years to get approval. The City needs to decide if this is a
high priority and if so, it should be added to the TIP and comprehensive plan. The City also
needs to consider what kind of staffing would be required. It might be best to consider a corddor
analysis instead of just this interchange. The LUTC is definitely interested in this issue.
Dave Kaplan, 30240 27~ Avenue South - He finds it hard to imagine a 312t~ interchange. It
would have a major impact on the apartments and Steel Lake Park. 312th would have to be
widened and a traffic light installed. It makes more sense to him to have an interchange at 304~.
FUTURE MEETINGS
The next meeting will be held in Council Chambers at 5:30 pm on February 5, 2001.
ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 6:45pm.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
February21,2001
Dean McColgan, Chair
Land Use and Transportation Committee
Marwan Salloum, Street Systems Manager~
David H. Moseley, City Manager
23r~ Avenue S Road Improvements Project (S 316th to S 324th Street) - 100% Design
Approval and Authorization to Bid
BACKGROUND
The proposed 23ra Avenue S Road Improvements Project design has been completed and is hereby presented for
your consideration. In an effort to reduce costs and public disruption, the following planned projects have been
incorporated into the design and will be constructed as part of this project:
City Center beautification improvements, includingutilityundergroundconversion and constructionof
the downtown streetscape plan conforming to City Center Street Design Guidelines from I-5 to the
easterly limit of the S 32ffh and SR-99 Improvement project.
· Sound Transit required frontage improvement along 23ra Avenue S.
· Tacoma Public Utilities Water Division 72" casing pipe.
· Lakehaven Utility District Water and sewer utility adjustment and pipe replacement.
PROPOSED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS
In an effort to reduce costs, eliminate utility conflicts, and reduce public disruption caused by the project, staff
recommends that the City enter into Interlocal Agreements (ILA) with Sound Transit, Lakehaven and the
Tacoma Public Utilities Water Division. A copy of the proposed ILA for Lakehaven and Tacoma Public
Utilities is attached for your consideration. The Sound Transit ILA will be provided at the meeting. Staffseeks
Council's authorization to enter into these agreements.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Planning and Design
Engineer's Construction Estimate
Construction Management
Underground Conversion (PSE)
Right of Way Acquisition
$ 700,000.00
6,500,000.00
600,000.00
369,900.00
1,000,000.00
Includes City Center beautification improvements and
10% project contingency
S 32ffh Street and 23fd Avenue S
Includes the area needed for Sound Transit frontage
improvements
Total Estimated Project Costs $ 9,169,900.00
AVAILABLE FUNDING
Grant Funding
Mitigation Fund
City Center Beautification
Improvements
PSE and US West Underground
Conversion
Lakehaven Utility District
Tacoma Public Utilities
Sound Transit
Budgeted City Match
5,478,700.00
809,185.00
497,744.00
337,400.00
101,066.00
97,267.00
400,OO&O0
2,184,000.00
TIA $4,726,700.00 and STPUL $752,000.00
Landscaping, decorative lights, etc. S 320'h Street
Utility replacement/adjustment cost
Total Available Budget $ 9,905,362.00
This project is on budget and we anticipate bidding the project in early March and awarding in April. All
required right of way has been acquired. Construction will commence in May with an estimated substantial
completion date in Spring 2002.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends placing the following items on the March 6, 2001 Council consent agenda for approval:
1. Approve the 100% design plans for the 23ra Avenue South Road Improvements Project
2. Authorize staffto bid the project and return to the City Council in April for permission to award the
project to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.
3. Authorize entering into the proposed Interlocal Agreement with the Lakehaven Utility District for the
23fa Avenue South Road Improvements Project.
4. Authorize entering into the proposed Interlocal Agreement with the Tacoma Public Utilities Water
Division for the 23rd Avenue South Road Improvements Project.
5. Authorize entering into the proposed InterlocaI Agreement with Sound Transit.
cc: Project File
Day File
k:\lutcX2001 L23 rd ave. 100%.doc
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
AND TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES WATER DIVISION
FOR THE 23RD AVENUE SOUTH ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
(SOUTH 316TH STREET TO SOUTH 324TH STREET)
THiS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the City of Federal Way (hereinafter
"City") and the City of Tacoma Department of Public Utilities, Water Division (hereinafter "Water
Division").
WHEREAS, the City proposes to proceed with the 23ra Avenue South Road Improvements Project
(South 316th Street to South 324th Street) (hereinafter "Project"); and
WHEREAS, The Water Division is planning the construction of a water transmission line in the
general area of the Project in accord with applicable Washington State and City of Federal Way laws,
regulations and franchises; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34 (Interlocal Cooperation Act) permits local governmental units to make
the most efficient use of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with other entitiesto provide services in
a manner best serving the needs and development of their local communities; and
WHEREAS, The Water Division can achieve cost savings and other benefits in the public's interest
by contracting with the City to perform certain services for the Water Division, including letting a public
works construction contract for the installation of a 72" casing pipe in connection with the Project
(hereinafter "Water Division Work"), and providing construction management services in support thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby covenanted and agreed by and between the Parties hereto as
follows:
I. DESIGN.
The Water Division shall provide the City reproducible construction drawings, special contract provisions,
and other necessary documents, which shall sufficiently detail requirements for the Water Division Work to
become a part of the plans and specifications for the Project. The design workshall be ~ormed by the
Water Division's design contractor. ~-:
II. BIDDING.
A. It is the intention of the City and the Water Division that the Water Division plans
and specifications shall be incorporated into the Contract Bid Documents for the Project in such manner as to
allow, to the extent possible, identification of cost allocations between the Parties.
B. Following opening of construction bids on the Project, the Water Division shall be
furnished with the bid responses submitted for the Water Division Work for the Water Division's approval.
Within ten days of receiving the bid prices, the Water Division shall notify the City in writing that the Water
Division either approves or rejects their portion of the bid award. Bid award shall be made to the lowest
responsible bidder for the total Project subject to applicable laws and regulations. The City shall not proceed
with the Water Division Work until the City has received approval from the Water Division for its portion of
the bid award; provided, however: if no bids are received which, in the estimation of the Water Division, are
acceptable to the Water Division for the Water Division Work, the Water Division shall so immediately
notify the City. The Water Division Work shall be deleted from the project contract and, in this event; the
City shall proceed with its portion of the Project. This Interlocal Agreement shall terminate effective the
date of the Water Division's notice to the City of the Water Division's rejection of all bids.
III. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
A. The City shall provide the necessary administrative, construction observation, and
clerical services necessary for the execution of the Project. In providing such services, the City Public
Works Director and/or his or her designee may exercise all the powers and perform all the duties vested by
law in him or her. The Water Division grants to the City Public Works Director and/or his or her designee
authority to act on behalf of the Water Division sufficient to carry out the provisions of this Agreement.
B. The Water Division shall furnish a construction observer to ensure proper
compliance with requirements during installation of the Water Division Work. The Water Division's
construction observer shall advise the City of any deficiencies noted. The Water Division's construction
observer, however, shall not cbmmunicate directly with or instruct the contractor directly on any matters
regarding contract performance.
C. The Water Division shall notify the City, in writing, of any changes it wishes to
make in the plans and specifications which affect the Water Division Work, which changes shall be made, if
feasible. The City shall notify the Water Division, in writing, of any changes required of the Water Division
Work and shall obtain the Water Division's approval of such changes. The Water Division's approval shall
not be unreasonably withheld. The Water Division shall be responsible for all costs incurred, directly or
indirectly, as a result of these or any other changes required or requested by the Water Division.
IV. PAYMENT.
A. The Water Division shall reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in
performing the Water Division Work, which costs shall include but are not limited to the Water Division
Work performed by the Project contractor(s), all Water Division requestedchanges, and the Water Division's
cost of the City services described in Paragraph III (a) herein, prorated as described in Exhibit A.
B. All payments shall be due from the Water Division to the City within thirty (30)
days after receipt of invoice from the City of said sums billed to the Water Division. Amounts unpaid after
said due date days shall accrue interest at a rate of one (1) percent per month.
V. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS.
A. The City agrees to indemnify and hold the Water Division, its elected officials,
officers, employees and agents harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities
(including costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, including, without limitation,
their respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising or resulting from, or connected with, this
Agreement to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the City, its agents or
employees, or by the City's breach of this Agreement.
B. The Water Division agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials,
officers, employees and agents harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities
(including costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, including, without limitation,
their respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising or resulting from, or connected with, this
Agreement to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Water Division, its agents or
employees, or by Water Division's breach of this Agreement.
The provisions of this paragraph shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement with
· respect to any event occurring prior to such expiration or termination.
Page 2
VI. DURATION.
This agreement shall become effective immediately upon execution by both parties. This
Agreement shall continue in force until either (1) the Water Division rejects all bids or (2) the City Council
accepts the completion of the project, whichever is earlier.
VII. OTHER PROVISIONS.
A. The City shall retain ownership and usual maintenance responsibility for the
roadway, storm drainage system, sidewalks, landscaping, traffic signals and all other appurtenances related
thereto.
B. Following completion of the construction and City's acceptance of the Project as
fully constructed according to plans, specifications and change orders, the City shall provide a Bill of Sale
transferring ownership of the water mains and appurtenances to the Water Division and the Water Division
shall thereafter be responsible for maintenance of such facilities.
C. This Agreement contains the entire written agreement of the Parties and supersedes
all prior discussion. This Agreement may be amended only in writing, signed by both Parties.
D. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from the date of signature by all
Parties to the date the City completes the Final Inspection upon completion of the Project and may be
extended for additional periods of time upon mutual written agreement of the City and Water Division.
Adherence to deadline dates is essential to the performance of this Interlocal Agreement.
E. Any provision of this Agreement, which is declared invalid, void or illegal shall in
no way affect, impair, or invalidate any other provision hereof and such other provisions shall remain in full
force and effect.
IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefit accruing herein, the Parties hereto agree that the work,
as set forth herein, will be performed by the City under the terms of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year
first above written.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY TACOMA WATER DMSION --~J~
David H. Moseley, City Manager
Water Superintendent
Date Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Bob C. Sterbank, City Attorney
K:~STREETS~PROJECTS~3RD\Tacoma Wate~,lLA TACOMA.doc
!/23/01
Chief Asst. City Attorney
Page 3
EXHIBIT "A"
23"° AVENUE SOUTH ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
(SOUTH 316~ STREET TO SOUTH 324TM STREET)
ESTIMA TED DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, PROJECT ADMINISTRATION AND
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTCOSTS FOR INCLUDING TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES
WA TER DIVISION 72"CASING PIPE
ESTIMATED DESIGN COST
Estimated design administration costs (ENTRANCO)
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Mobilization
Construction Staking
Off- Duty Uniformed Police Officer
Traffic Control Labor
72" Casing Pipe
Trench Safety System
10% Construction Cost
LS
32 hours @ $ 32.00/HR
120 hours @ $ 34.00/HR
1 LS
1 LS
$2,643.00
$ 6,000.00
$ 3,600.00
$1,024.00
$ 4,080.00
$45,000.00
$10,000.00
Subtotal Construction
$69,704.00
Sales Tax @ 8.6% of Construction Cost
Subtotal Constriction Including Sales Tax
$ 5,995.0O
$75,699.00
Construction Contingency (10% of Construction cost.)
Construction Administration (5% of Construction cost)
Construction Management (10% of Construction cost.)
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST
$ 7,570.00
$ 3,785.00
$ 7,570.00
$9;~1624.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST (ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION) $97,267.00
Note: Costs represented are estimates only. Actual costs incurredwill be used to calculate
final cost of Tacoma Public Utilities Water 72"Casing Pipe portion for reimbursement to the
City.
K:\STREETS\PROJECTS\23\TACOMA WATER\ILA
1123/01
Page 4
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
AND LAKEHAVEN UTILIIY DISTRICT
FOR THE 23RD AVENUE SOUTH ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PRO3ECT
(SOUTH 316TH STREET TO SOUTH 324TH STREET)
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the Ob/of Federal Way (hereinafter
"City") and Lakehaven Utility District (hereinafter "District").
WHEREAS, the City proposes to proceed with the 23rd Avenue South Road Improvements Project
(South 316th Street to South 324m Street) (hereinafter "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Disbict provides Water and sewer service in the general area of the Project in accord
with applicable Washington State and Qty of Federal Way laws, regulations and franchises; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the roadway improvements being undertaken by the City, the District
will be required to relocate certain water and sanitary sewer fadlities such as fire hydrants, valves, water
meters, etc.; resolve any waterline/utility conflicts; and adjust sewer manholes, within the Project area; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34 (Inteflocal Cooperation ACt) permits local governmental units to make the
most effident use of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with other entities to provide services in a
manner best serving the needs and development of their local communities; and
WHEREAS, the District can achieve cost savings and other benefits in the public's interest by
contracting with the City to perform certain services for the District, including letting a public works
construction contract for the installation of the water improvements in connection with the Project
(hereinalter "District Work"), and providing construction management services in support thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby covenanted and agreed by and between the Parties hereto as follows:
Io DESIGN.
The District shall reimburse the City for the reprodudble construction drawings, spedal
contract provisions, and other necessary documents, Which shall suffidently detail requirements for the
Distdct Work to become a part of the plans and specifications for the Project. The District agrees that design
work shall be performed by the Cib/s design contractor, ENTRANCO.
II. BIDDING.
A. It is the intention of the City and the District that the District plans and spedfications
shall be incorporated into the Contract Bid Documents for the Project in such manner as to allow, to the
extent possible, identification of cost allocations between the Parties.
B. Following opening of construction bids on the Project, the District shall be fumished
with the bid responses submitted for the District Work for the Districffs approval. Within twenty days of
receiving the bid prices, the District shall notify the Ob/in. writing that the Distdct either approves or rejects
their portion of the bid award. Bid award shall be made to the lowest responsible bidder for the total Project
subject to applicable laws and regulations. The City shall not proceed with the Distdct Work until the City has
received approval from the Distdct for its portion of the bid award; provided, however: if no bids are received
which, in the estimation of the District, are acceptable to the District for the District Work, the District shall so
immediately notify the City. The District Work shall be deleted from the project ~:ontract and, in this event;
the City shall proceed with its portion of the Project. This Intedocal Agreement shall terminate effective the
date of the District's notice to the City of the District's rejection of all bids.
Page 1
III. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
A. The City shall provide the necessary administrative, construction observation, and
clerical services necessary for the execution of the Project. In providing such services, the City Public Works
Director and/or his or her designee may exercise all the powers and perform all the duties vested by law in
him or her. The District grants to the City Public Works Director and/or his or her designee authority to act
on behalf of the District sufficient to carry out the provisions of this Agreement.
B. The District shall notify the City, in writing, of any changes it wishes to make in the
plans and specifications which affect the District Work, which changes shall be made, if feasible. The City
shall notify the District, in writing, of any changes required of the District Work and shall obtain the District's
approval of such changes. The District's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. The District shall be
responsible for all costs incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of these or any other changes required or
requested by the District.
IV. PAYMENT.
A. The District shall reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in performing
the District Work, which costs shall include but are not limited to the District Work performed by the Project
contractor(s), all District requested changes, and the District's cost of the City services described in Paragraph
III (a) herein, prorated as described in Exhibit A.
B. All payments shall be due from the District to the City within thirty (30) after approval
by the District's Board of Commissioners of said sums-billed to the District. Amounts unpaid after said due
date days shall accrue interest at a rate of one (1) percent per month.
V. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS.
A. The City agrees to indemnify and hold the District, its elected offidals, officers,
employees and agents harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (induding
costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, induding, without limitation, their
respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising or resulting from, or connected with, this Agreement
to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the City, its agents or employees, or by the
City's breach of this Agreement.
B. The District agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected offidals, officers,
employees and agents harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (induding
costs and all attomey fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, induding, without limitation, their
respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising or resulting from, or connected with, this Agreement
to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the District, its agents or employees, or by
District's breach of this Agreement.
The provisions of this paragraph shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement with
respect to any event occurring prior to such expiration or termination.
VI. DURATION.
This agreement shall become effective immediately upon execution by both parties. This
Agreement shall continue in force until either (1) the District rejects all bids or (2) the City Council accepts the
completion of the project, whichever is earlier.
VII. OTHER PROVISIONS.
A. The City shall retain ownership and usual maintenance responsibilityfor the roadway,
storm drainage system, sidewalks, landscaping, traffic signals and all other appurtenances related thereto.
Page 2
B. Following completion of the construction and City's acceptanceof the Project as fully
constructed according to plans, specifications and change orders, the City shall provide a Bill of Sale
transferring ownership of the water mains and appurtenances to the District and the District shall thereafter
be responsible for maintenance of such facilities.
C. This Agreement contains the entire wdtten agreementor the Parties and supersedes
all prior discussion. This Agreement may be amended only in writing, signed by both Parties.
D. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from the date of signature by all
Parties to the date the City completes the Final Inspection upon completion of the Project and may be
extended for additional periods of time upon mutual written agreement of the City and District. Adherence to
deadline dates is essential to the performance of this [ntedocal Agreement.
E. Any provision of this Agreement, which is declared invalid, void or illegal shall in no
way affect, impair, or invalidate, any other provision hereof and such other provisions shall remain in full force
and effect.
IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefit accruing herein, the Parties hereto agree that the work, as
set forth herein, will be performed by the City under the terms of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year
first above written.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT
David H. Moseley, City Manager
General Manager
Date Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Bob C. Sterbank, City Attomey
General Counsel, Steven H. Pritchett
K:\STREETS\PRO] ECTS\23 RD\Lakehaven\iLA.doc
1/231Ol
Page 3
EXHIBIT "A"
23"D AVENUE SOUTH ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
(SOUTH 316"' STREET TO SOUTH 324TM STREET)
ESTIMA TED DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, PROJECT ADMINISTRATION AND
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTCOSTS FOR INCLUDING LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT
UTILITY RELOCATION AND ADJUSTMENTS
ESTIMATED DESIGN COST
Estimated design costs for Lakehaven utility relocations (ENTRANCO)
$5,144.00
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Mobilization
Construction Staking
Traffic Control Labor
Traffic Control Supervisor
Adjust Water Meter vault
Relocate Fire Hydrant
Adjust Sanitary Sewer Manholes
Adjust Water Valve Box
Adjust Blow off Box
Adjust PRV
12" Water Main Class 50 DIP
Adjust Detector Check vault
Relocate Side sewer
Remove and Disposal of Asbestos Pipe
LS $ 6,100.00
I @ LS $ 3,500.00
240 hours @ $28.00/hr. $ 6,720.00
24 hours @ $40.00/hr $ 960.00
4 @ $ 500.00/ea. $ 2,000.00
6 @ $ 2000.00/ea. $12,000.00
9 @ $400/ea. $ 3,600.00
24 @ $180.00/ea. $ 4,320.00
1 @ $1000.00/ea $1,000.00
1 @ $1,500.00/ea $1,500.00
1686 $80/LF $13,440.00
1 @ $1,500.00/ea $ 1,500.00
FA $11,500.00
1686 $15/LF $ 2,520.00
Subtotal Construction
$70,660.00
Sales Tax @ 8.6% of Construction Cost
$ 6,077.00
Subtotal Constriction Including Sales Tax
$ 76,737.00
Construction Contingency (10% of Construction cost.)
Construction Administration (5% of Construction cost)
Construction Management (10% of Construction cost.)
$ 7,674.00
$ 3,837.00
$ 7,674.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST
$95,922.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST (Design & Construction)
$101,066.00
Note: Costs represented are estimates only. Actual costs incurredwill be used to calculate
final cost of Lakehaven Utility District's utility relocation portion for reimbursement to the
City.
K:~STREETS~PROJECTS~3RD~akehaven~ILA.doc
1/23/01
Page 4
CITY OF~
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
February 2 I, 2001
Dean McColgan, Chair
Land Use and Transportation Committee
Hazem EI-Assar, Assistant Traffic Engineer ¢~
David H. Moseley, City Manager
Twin Lakes Neighborhood Traffic Safety (BITS) Project
BACKGROUND
Residents in the vicinity of SW 314t~ Street near 272 Avenue SW have requested the installation of
speed humps in that area based on concerns of high traffic speeds and cut-through traffic. Currently
adopted installation criteria are based on a point system as follows:
0.5 0.3 - 0.5 500 - 1100 26 - 29
1.0 0.5 - 0.7 1101 - 1700 29.1 - 32
1.5 0.7 - 0.9 1701 - 2300 32.1 - 35
2.0 0.9 - 1.1- 2301 - 2900 35.1 - 38
2.5 1.1 - 1.3 2901 - 3500 38.1 - 41
3.0 More than 1.3 More than 3500 More than 41
Installation criteria are met if the total number of severity points is equal to or greater than 3.0.
A traffic study conducted by the Colella Estates Subdivision proponent in October 1999 indicated that
the subject location would receive 1.0 point for traffic volume, 2.0 points for traffic speed, and 0 points
for accident history. Therefore, the total number of points is 3.0, which meets the 3.0-point minimum to
qualify for speed hump installation.
On November 2, 2000 staff conducted a neighborhood meeting to discuss potential traffic calming
alternatives that might be effective in reducing s~peed and cut-through traffic within the neighborhood.
After discussion between the neighborhood residents and staff, a consensus was reached to propose the
installation of three speed humps in order to mitigate the identified problems. In accordance with
established NTS policies, staff sent ballots to property owners and occupants within 600 feet of the
proposed speed hump locations and the following table summarizes the ballot results:
Ballots Sent 52 56 1 O0
Ballots Returned 15 32 41
Yes Votes 15 (100%) 32 (i00%) 39 (95%)
No Votes 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (5%)
One of the installation criteria requires a 50% majority of the returned ballots. Based on the above table,
all locations met the balloting criteria.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends placing the 'following item on the March 6, 2001 Council Consent Agenda:
Approve the installation of three speed-humps on SW 314* Street near 27* Avenue SW.
HE:jif
kAlutck200 Iktwin lakes nts.doc