LUTC PKT 07-17-2000July 17, 2000
5:3.0 pm
"ilCity °i~ demi Way
: ?... ::i:?::: City CoUndl'
'"':::' !i.'. L:~d USe/Tran~pbrtafion COmmittee.`.` '"
'~" C0uneil Chambers
2.
3.
4.
MEETING AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the July 10, 2000, meeting
PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes)
BUSINESS ITEMS
A. Part 150 Study Update
B. Draft Comprehensive Plah 1999 Amendments
Parks Comprehensive Plan, and Chapters 3, 6-10
C. Amendment to Countywide Planning Policies
D. GMPC Update
E. Sound Transit Update
Brief'mg
Action
Action
Briefing
Briefmg
Fewins/10 min
Clark, JaingaY45 min
Clark/10 min
Burbidge/10 min
Clifton/10 min
FUTURE MEETING AGENDA ITEMS.
SWM/CIP West Hylebos Channel Stabilization
2000 King County Comprehensive Plan Update
6. ADJOURN
Committee Members:
Phil Watkins, Chair
Jeanne Burbidge
Dean McColgan
City Staff:
Stephen Clifton, Director, Community Development Services
Sandy Lyle, Administrative Assistant
253.661.4116
IALU-TRANS~uty 17, 2000 LUTC AGN doc
July 10, 2000
5:30 pm
City of Federal Way
'-City Council
Land Use/Transportation Committee
City Council
Council Chambers
MEETING SUMMARY
In attendance: Committee members Phil Watkins, Chair, Jeanne Burbidge and Dean McColgan; Mayor Michael
Park; Deputy Mayor Linda Kochmar; Council members Mary Gates and Michael Hellickson; Director of
Community Development Services Stephen Clifton; Assistant City Attorney Bob Sterbank; Senior Planner Margaret
Clark; Traffic Engineer Rick Perez; Assistant to the City Manager Derek Matheson; Administrative Assistant Sandy
Lyle.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Watkins called the meeting to order at 5:36pm.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the June 26, 2000, meeting were approved as presented.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no public comment on any item not included in the agenda.
4. BUSINESS ITEMS
Market Analysis - Terry Moore and David Lindahl, principals at EcoNorthwest, a consulting firm
from Eugene, Oregon, presented their market analysis findings in the form of a Power Point
presentation. The general objectives of the assignment were better development and
redevelopment in the City and meeting state mandates and local needs. Specifically, their task
was to forecast growth over the next twenty years and the implications for demand and supply,
analyzing traffic, and providing assistance with Comprehensive Plan and zoning changes. The
Committee was particularly interested in housing figures as they corresponded to the Puget Sound
Regional Council's housing projections The Market Analysis is a potential useful tool to be used
to adjust PSRC projections.
Draft Comprehensive Plan 1999 Amendments/Site Specific Requests to Change Land Use
Designations - Following a brief'mg on the background of the three site-specific Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Designation changes, the Committee voted to approve the Sayre request for a
parcel on Pacific Highway South at South 3046 and the Quadrant Residential #1 request on South
320th Street east of I-5 (including the Federal Way Fire Station). The Committee denied Sally
Ramos request on the Velasco property at Hoyt Road and SW 340t~. Fred Ketcherson, a resident
of the neighborhood opposing the change, spoke about the reasons he and some of his neighbors
believe there should be no change to the Comprehensive Plan.
Draft Comprehensive Plan 1999 Amendments/Chapter 1, 2, 4, 5 - There were few significant
changes to the Comprehensive Plan. Most changes involved minor language changes, deletion of
completed projects and old dates that have passed. In Chapter 2, a new Professional Office
Comprehensive Plan designation was added. In Chapter 4, multi-family was changed to multiple
family to reflect the different types of housing allowed in various zones. Some language was
struck in Chapter 5 due to its inappropriateness for the processes currently followed.
OTHER
There were no other topics discussed.
FUTURE MEETINGS
The next meeting will be held in Council Chambers at 5:30 pm on July 17, 2000.
ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 7:45pm.
Dernier enregistrement par CFW-User
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
RE:
~uly ~ ~, 2ooo
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC)
Phil Watldns, Chair
Greg F~s, Principal Planner
David 1V~~anager
Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Part 150 Noise Study Update
At the request of Chairman Watkins, the following is an update on the Seattle-Tacoma
International Airport Part 150 Noise Study ("Study"). The purpose of the Study is to evaluate
aircrait noise and land use measures intended to alleviate noise impacts in surrounding
communities. Of particular interest to Federal Way are recommendations on south flow flight
track modifications.
On April 25, 2000, the city transmitted Federal Way City Council resolution number 00-312 to
the Port of Seattle Commission. This resolution supported the Study Committee's
recommendations for a three-track alternative with minor modifications. One modification
outlined in the resolution includes a nighttime.shift of westbound flights from the 320t~ corridor
South over the Port of Tacoma (''Commencement Bay corridor").
Because of the interest expressed by the Study Committee and comments from elected officials
and the public, the Port of Seattle Commission decided to expedite consideration of the flight
track recommendations. On May 8, 2000, Port of Seattle staff issued a staff'briefing and
recommendations on the Study Committee recommendations. Port staff recommended further
study and coordination of the nighttime (midnight to 5 AM) use of the Commencement Bay
corridor. However Port staff did not recommend implementation of either the two or three track
dispersal options.
The Port of Seattle Commission received public testimony on May 9, 2000 and conducted a
public hearing on May 18, 2000. On June 5, 2000, the city again transmitted resolution number
00-312 to the Port of Seattle Commission with a cover letter requesting serious consideration of
recommendations outlined in the resolution.
The Commission considered a resolution and conducted a preliminary vote on flight track
modifications on June 13,2000. A final vote on the resolution occurred on June 27, 2000.
Commission concurred with all of the Port staff's recommendations.
The
The remaining Part 150 Noise Study recommendations are now proceeding through the Port of
Seattle Commission's process. Following a public hearing, a final decision on the overall Study
by the Commission is scheduled for October 2000. The Commission's final decision on the Study
will be sent to the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") for final approval. The FAA has 180
days to review the Study. Port staff indicates there is no public process associated with FAA's
review of the Study.
dl7:prtl50
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
May 31, 2000
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Robert Vaughn, Chair of the City of Federal Way Planning Commission
Kathy McClung, Deputy Director of Community Development Services
Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner
Response from Jim Hamilton, Administrator of the Fire Department
At the May 17, 2000, public hearing on the 1999 Comprehensive Plan Amendments, the Planning
Commission requested additional information as to why the Federal Way Fire Department was proposing
the following change:
An emergency response time of less than sin seven minutes, 80 percent of the time (response time
is measured from the time that the call is answered until the first apparatus is on the scene).
Please find attached, a letter dated May 22, 2000 from Jim Hamilton, Administrator of the Federal Way
Fire Department, in which he responds to this question.
Please call Margaret Clark at (253) 661-3735 if you have questions regarding this memorandum or Mr.
Hamilton' s response.
I:\99CMPAMN~Memo on Fire Response to Planning Commission/5/31/00 3:15 PM
May22,2000
Margaret Clark
City of Federal Way
Dear Margaret,
First let me apologize for not attending the recent meeting regarding the update to
the Comprehensive Plan. I had an earlier commitment that I was hopeful would end
in time to permit my attendance, but obviously that did not occur.
Per our conversation, you were requesting clarification on our response time
standards. In the past, we utilized an Average Response Time Standard.
Unfortunately, averaging data can be somewhat misleading in that a very quick
response combined with a very long response will meet an Average Standard. The
long response time can go unnoticed. We now utilize a Fractile Response Time
Standard that identifies percentages of calls within a standard. This allows us to
identify our response times by various time elements and provides a much more
accurate representation.
We have updated our standard for the latest revision to the Comprehensive Plan
based upon actual response time data. We annually analyze our response time by
zones within the District, providing information on response times by geographic
area.
The components of response times are as follows:
Dispatch Processing Time: This is the time from receipt of call in dispatch
to tone-out. Note: We have one of the lowest dispatch processing times in
the region.
Reaction Time: This is the time from Tone-out to vehicles actually
responding.
Drive Time: This is the time from vehicle response to on-scene.
Many fire agencies do not include dispatch processing time in their data. We
include dispatch response times in our data since it is an accurate representation of
response time from the caller's perspective. Our data shows the following:
Percentage under 6 minutes: 60%
Percentage under 7 minutes: 78%
Percentage under 8 minutes: 89%
The Dispatch Processing and Reaction times have been relatively stable, although
our past data is in averages. Predictably, the drive time is the variable that provides
the greatest challenge due to increased traffic congestion, and Federal Way is
certainly no exception. Even though our vehicles are equipped with Opticom
emitters that sequence traffic signals, getting through heavy traffic is still a difficult,
and sometimes lengthy, process. The upgrades to major streets and intersections
that are scheduled over the next few years should provide some relief.
The other factor is related to positioning of apparatus due to simultaneous calls and
training drills. If a call comes in for a zone whose apparatus is not in that zone, the
response time will be extended. We are addressing this issue through three
initiatives. The first is to identify which types of training processes could be
provided via our information system network versus bringing multiple companies
together in a single location. This will permit the fire companies to remain in their
response zones during classroom training exercises, reducing their response times.
We are currently upgrading our network bandwidth as part of the ATT fiber project.
For our sites outside the City, we are evaluating fiber and wireless alternatives. We
plan to implement training courses via our network in 2001.
The second initiative is staffing all engine companies with a minimum of three
personnel. Aside from a host of positive impacts on fire and EMS operations and
safety, three-person staffing will reduce the number of engine companies required at
a scene. This will permit more companies to stay in their response zone, reducing
response times for simultaneous calls. We began this process in 1993, and now
have four of our six engine companies staffed with three personnel. We will utilize
savings from our move to Valleycom in 2002 to fund the third person at the final
two companies.
The third initiative is staffing of an additional EMS unit. This unit will help us to
reduce the amount of simultaneous calls that result in bringing in apparatus from
another zone. It will also provide us the opportunity to keep a staffed unit within an
area of the district during those training drills that still require joint participation of
multiple fire companies at a single location. The second EMS unit is dependent
upon available funding, but our projections are for implementation within the next
2 - 3 years, at which time our staffing levels will have increased from fourteen
(1993) to twenty-two.
I hope this clarifies why we modified our response time standards to reflect actual
data. If there is any additional information that I can provide, please do not hesitate
to contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Jim Hamilton,
Administrator
Memo
To: Land Use and Transportation Committee
From: Jon Jainga, Parks Planning and Development Manag
VIA= David M~nager
Date: 07/12/00
Re: Final Draft; Parks, Recreation and Open Space Comprehensive Plan 2000
Attached is a copy of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Comprehensive Plan 2000 final
draft for your review.
I have been working together with the Parks and Recreation Commission for the last twenty
months revising, updatingand changing the 1995 Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Comprehensive Plan. The revised draft plan focuses on the level of services which the City
can deliver to the Citizens of Federal Way. Listed below are the major changes from the 1995
plan:
· New Vision, Mission & Goals (Section I - page 1&2)
· Revised Level of Service (Section III - page 1)
· Revised Land Categories, Table 4 (Section III - page 2)
· Revised Planning Area Boundary (Section VII - page 5)
· Revised Finandal Plan / ClP Ranking System (Section VII - page 6)
The final plan will include colored dty maps and pictures that will be inserted onto the front
cover sheet and the section sheets.
Both the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Planning Commission have reviewed the
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Comprehensive Plan 2000 final draft. Both Commissions
have approved the final draft plan and have recommended it to be fonNarded to Council for
approval.
I would like to personally thank Jerry Bollen, H. David Kaplan, Barbara Reid, Kad Grosh, Jim
Baker, Laird Chambers, Madon Bartholomew and Dini Duclos for all their hard work and
dedication that went into the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Comprehensive Plan 2000
final draft.
· Page 1
City of
Federal Way,
Washington
Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Comprehensive Plan 2000
Message from the Director
The development of the 2000 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan
provides an opportunity to review and evaluate the City's ability to meet
the goals and implementation strategies. The plan builds upon the
progress achieved over the past ten years to creatively and responsively
acquire, develop, and foster community partnerships in meeting the
community's need for parks, open space, and recreation opportunities.
The plan was developed by collaborative efforts of the Parks and
Recreation Commission and the Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services
Department. Together, as one committee, the following objectives were
identified to guide the committee's work:
· Recommend a vision that will guide the plan's implementation.
· Evaluate whether the original goals and objectives developed in 1990
for a "new" City are appropriate to guide the City into the next century.
· Update the inventory of public lands.
· Incorporate the City's code regarding land_use for open space.
· Conduct a parks and recreation survey to obtain community feedback
on its needs and interests for parks and recreation services.
· Develop a document that conveys the City's philosophy on the
physical, social, and economic benefits that parks, open space, and
recreation programs contribute to the overall foundation of the
community's quality of life.
Federal Way has made significant progress toward its goal to provide
parks, open spaces, and recreation services through the community.
The vision and strategies presented in this plan will provide continued
progress to develop a legacy of parks, open space, and recreation
opportunities for citizens to enjoy into the next millennium.
Jennifer Schroder,
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Final Draft 2000 i
City of Federal Way
Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Comprehensive Plan
COUNCIL ~ ' "' .... ~ .... ~ '
Michael Park, Mayor
Linda Kochmar, Deputy Mayor
Jeanne Burbidge,
Mary Gates
Michael Hellickson
Dean McColgan
Phil Watkins
David H. Moseley, City Manager
Jennifer Schroder, Director, Parks, Recreation and Cutural Services
Mary Faber, Community and Cultural Services Manager
Steve Ikerd, Property Services Manager
Jon Jainga, Parks Planning and Development Manager
Vicki Norris, Parks Supervisor
Kurt Reuter, Athletics and Specialized Services Manager
Sue Smith, Administrative Assistant
Dini Duclos, Chair
Dave Armstrong, Vice Chair
Marion Bartholomew
Jim Baker
Jerry Bollen
Laird Chambers
Karl Grosch
C.T. Purdom
Len Zickler
Alternates:
Mike Lane
John Morrison
Cit~ of Federal tVa. v
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Final Draft 2000 ii
Allan Smith, Chair
Peggy LaPorte, Vice Chair
Lorene Fortini
Jung Ho Kim
Ted Nelson
Jackie Peterson
Alternates:
Ronald Smith
Lana Bostic
Joanne Piquette
Bette Simpson
Krista White
Fran Veiling
· YOUTH COMMISSION
David Pearson, Chair
Saeropda Kim, Vice Chair
Joseph Seong
Aurea Magbalot
Bryan Baker
Ebony Taylor-Walker
Philip Lee
Alternates:
Alison Bennett
Sarah Strong
Amy Williams
Sue Park
Shioun Kim
Mailinh Vu
Jevyn Knight
Michelle Vander Poi
Loni Johnson
REPORT PREPA~TIONCONSULTANT
R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc.
705 - Second Avenue, Suite 710
Seattle, Washington 98104
206/624-6239
www.rwta.com
Robert W. Thorpe, AICP
Stephen Speidel, ASLA
Gareth V. Roe, AICP
Miles Mayhew
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Final Draft 2000 iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
Vision
Mission
Goals
History
Accomplishments
Department Organization
Department Operations
I-1
I-1
I-2
I-3
I-3
I-5
I-6
SECTION II
COMMUNITY PROFILE
Regional Location
Planning Area
Population Characteristics
Population Projections
I1-1
I1-1
I1-1
11-3
SECTION III
EXISTING PARK AND RECREATION SERVICES
Introduction
Park Land Definitions
City Park Inventory
King County Park Inventory in Federal Way
Washington State Park Inventory in Federal Way
Federal Way School District Facilities
Summary of Existing Sports Facilities
II1-1
II1-1
111-2
111-8
111-9
111-9
111-15
SECTION IV
RECREATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Introduction
Department Accomplishments from 1990 - 1999
1999 Parks and Recreation Survey
Developing Recreation Needs for Federal Way
Park Land Needs
Athletic Facility Needs
IV-1
IV-1
IV-2
IV-3
IV-3
IV-9
SECTION V
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Introduction
Goals and Objectives
V-1
V-2
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Final Draft 2000 iv
SECTION VI
DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA AND
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Introduction
Neighborhood Parks
Community Parks
Regional Parks
Special Use Areas
Trails
Undeveloped / Open Space Areas
Construction Details - Trails
VI-1
VI-1
VI-2
VI-3
VI-4
VI-4
VI-5
VI-6
SECTION VII
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Introduction
Capital Project Implementation Process
Founding Sources
Park Acquisition/Development/Renovation Criteria
Parks and Recreation Planning Area Designation
1999-2012 Parks Capital Improvement Plan
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
City Vicinity Map
Park Map
Federal Way School District Facilities Map
Parks and Recreation Planning Area Designation
1999-2012 Parks Capital Improvement Plan
APPENDIX
Cultural Arts Plan
VII-1
VII-1
VII-2
VII-3
VII-5
VII-6
11-2
111-7
111-12
VII-5
VII-6
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Final Draft 2000 v
<<INSERT PHOTO>>
SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
Vision Statement
Imagine a city where you can walk or
bike along meandering trails through
forests rich with native wildlife, plants
and trees. These trails lead to many
of your favorite places for enjoying the
outdoors or socializing and recreating
with friends. Some parks, like Dumas
Bay Centre, overlook the Puget Sound
and the snow-capped Olympic
Mountains. Walking trails lead through
wetlands and forested regions, like the
Hylebos, where the botanical diversity
of the area can be experienced by all.
Opportunities abound to encounter
symbols of the Northwest, such as
sweeping views of Mount Rainier from
the BPA Trail, glimpses of the majestic
Bald Eagle, the Great Blue Heron and
the 100 year old Douglas firs found at
Lake Killarney Open Space Park.
Other parks provide access to the
·active recreational opportunities and
open spaces such as those found at
Steel Lake Park and in the other
neighborhood parks spread throughout
the city. Eighty-three acres of vast
green spaces found in the heart of the
city at Celebration Park provide
opportunities for tournament softball
and soccer events. The park also
provides walking trails through
preserved forested woodlands and
safe play areas for children and their
families.
People and businesses from
throughout the region will want to
experience and be a part of such a
place. Local businesses will thrive as
more residents and visitors take
advantage of the recreational and
cultural opportunities within the
community.
Federal Way is becoming such a
community and is recognized as being
a leader in making the most of its
setting through the implementation of
a trail and park system that
exemplifies the special qualities
unique to the Northwest. All who
come to Federal Way leave with a
sense of admiration for what they have
seen and experienced.
Mission Statement
"The mission of the Parks,
Recreation and Cultural Services
Department is to enrich community
life through the provision and
stewardship of parks, leisure and
cultural experiences."
Dumas Bay and Puget Sound
This network of parks, trails and open
spaces provides opportunities for
passive and active recreational
pursuits along with valuable cultural
offerings within an attractive setting.
Mount Rainier from BPA Trail
City of Federal Way
Introduction
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
2000 Final Draft Section I - 1
Goals
The following goals will be used to
guide and facilitate the implementation
of the Vision and Mission statements.
e
Operate the Parks, Recreation and
Cultural Services Department in a
fiscally responsible and creative
manner.
e
Protect and enhance parks,
recreation sites and public green
spaces.
Provide well-designed, developed
and maintained parks and recreation
facilities that offer leisure
opportunities for citizens of all ages
and interests.
Fourth of July Festival
Encourage citizen involvement in the
park and recreation planning process.
Promote the philosophy that investing
in the city's unique and diverse
recreational opportunities and natural
resources will realize outstanding
returns for the quality and prosperity
of urban life.
Hylebos Wetlands Trails
Lake Killarney Open Space
City of Federal Way
Introduction
Volunteer Work Party
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
2000 Final Draft Section I - 2
History
The City of Federal Way was
incorporated on February 28, 1990
and is now the seventh largest city in
the state and third largest in King
County. Created in 1991, the Parks,
Recreation and Open Space
Comprehensive Plan was one of the
first city documents. The Plan was
revised November 21, 1995 to reflect
the accomplishments of the first five
years. Federal Way has had four years
to reflect on the Plan and during that
time many improvements and changes.
have been made. The purpose of the
2000 Plan is to reflect these changes
and decide how to meet future
demands for park and recreation
services in the Federal Way area.
During its first ten years, Federal Way
has continued its commitment to
providing parks and recreation
services and addressing the
community's needs. One of the key
points in the original Parks, Recreation
and Open Space Plan was a concern
for acquiring future park sites.
Because of rapid growth, undeveloped
land for new parks was being
purchased for private development.
The Plan called for an aggressive park
acquisition program while
opportunities existed. As a result,
much of the necessary parks and
open space lands were acquired
during the first half of the 1990s.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
The following are the major
accomplishments in the Parks,
Recreation and Cultural Services
Department from 1995 to 1999.
The Parks, Recreation and Cultural
Services Department has continued
to follow the City Council's direction
of applying for grant dollars
whenever possible to help with the
cost of capital projects. Since 1995,
the Parks, Recreation and Cultural
Services Department has been
awarded a total of $969,038 in
grants for capital park projects.
Development of Celebration Park;
the park includes four lighted soccer
and four lighted baseball fields, two
concession / restrooms buildings,
play structure, 493 parking stalls, 48
acres of natural forested woodlands
and walking trails.
Construction of the Knutzen Family
Theatre; a 250 seat performing arts
center, rehearsal and dressing
rooms. The theater is connected to
the Dumas Bay Centre.
Renovation of the Visitation Retreat
and Cultural Center into the Dumas
Bay Centre. The facility includes
conference and banquet facilities,
which support overnight
accommodations for business
retreats, weddings and conferences.
Development of Lake Killarney Open
Space Park; an 11 acre open space
/ neighborhood park which
preserves the natural woodlands
along the shores of Lake Killarney.
The site includes walking trails and
picnicking. This site was formally
the "Lutherland Summer Camp".
City of Federal Way
Introduction
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
2000 Final Draft Section I - 3
Between 1995 and 1999, the Parks,
RecreatiOn and Cultural Services
Department purchased 11.5 acres of
new park land.
Renovation of Lake Grove
Elementary School sports field.
Reconstruction of two 200' ball fields
with one overlapping youth soccer
field.
Renovation of Mark Twain
Elementary School sports field.
Reconstruction of one ball field with
one overlapping youth soccer field.
Steel Lake Park- Skate Park
Master Plan. The planning and
development of a new 20,000
square foot skate board / in-line
skate park.
Renovation of Mirror Lake
Neighborhood Park play structure.
The reconstruction of a new, safe
play structure replacing the old
unsafe structure.
Renovation of Lake Grove
Neighborhood Park play structure.
The reconstruction of a new, safe
play structure replacing the old
unsafe structure.
Renovation of Steel Lake Park
beach front. Construction of a new
beach house, which includes
restrooms, lifeguard facilities, park
concessions and ADA
improvements. The beach
improvements also include a new
concrete walkway, public art and
parking.
Celebration Park
Knutzen Family Theatre
Dumas Bay Centre
City of Federal Way
Introduction
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
2000 Final Draft Section I - 4
DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION
The Federal Way Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department is one of
seven departments in the City. Each of these departments report directly to the City
Manager, who in turn reports to the Mayor and City Council. Within the Parks,
Recreation and Cultural Services Department, there are five separate divisions.
Three of these divisions report to the Director and the other two divisions report to the
Deputy Director. The department organization is shown below.
Parks, Recreation, and
Cultural Services
Director
Department Total 26.9 FTE
· Council Committee/Commission Support
· Department Direction
· Implement Parks, Recreation, &
Open Space Comprehensive Plan
· Intradepartmental Coordination
· Regional Issues and Involvement
I
Maintenance Operations
Deputy Director
Parks Maintenance
Division
7,0 FTE
· Athletic Field Maintenance
· Facilities Maintenance
· Ground Maintenance
· Park Upgrades
· Recreation &
Community Events /
Program Support
.Signs
· Turf Program
2.0 FTE
· Director Support
· Intradepartmental Coordination
· Parks and Recreation Commission
· Park Maintenance & Operations
I
Property Service
Division
2,4 FTE
· City Hall Maintenance
· Contract Management
Administration
· Equipment Maintenance
· Graffiti Removal Program
· Office Configuration
· Property Management
-Purchasing
.Secu~ty
· Urban Forestry
· Volunteer Program
Administrative
Support
1.0 FTE
, .Council Committee Support · Commission Support
· Customer Service
· Director Support
Athletic & Special
Services Division
6.0 FTE
· Adult Athletics
.Aquatics
· Celebration Park
· Klahanee Lake
Community/Senior Center
· Senior Programs
· Special Populations
· Youth Athletics
· Youth Commission
/
Community & Parks Planning and
Cultural Services Development
Division Division
6.5 FTE 1.0 FTE
· Arts & Special Events .Acquisition
· Arts Commission -Comprehensive Plan
· Community Recreation -Contract Administration
· Dumas Bay Center -Developer Plan Review
· Knutzen Family Theater .Grant Writing
· Red, White, & Blues .Intradepartmental
Festival Coordination/
Assistance
-Landscape
Architecture Services
· Master Planning
· Park Design/Renovation
· Project Management
· Volunteer Programs
City of Federal Way
Introduction
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
2000 Final Draft Section I - 5
DEPARTMENT OPERA TIONS
Operating Cost
The Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department's operating cost has
averaged about 11.1% of the city's operating budget over the last four years. For the
1999 fiscal year, the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department's operating
cost was 11.5% of the City's total budget.
Table 1
Comparison of Park and Recreation Budget to City's Adopted Budget
%,.-.:,"i :' ~¥ear.. ~:! .' .i:..:.:..' ::':~l'~:Budget.( ! , ,:, ,Budget ,'_ ,~. . City Bud;et
1992 $29,071,104 $2,969,466 10.0%
1993 $33,280,458 $3,105,531 9.5%
1994 $31,775,807 $2,861,804 9.0%
1995 $25,270,805 $3,325,867 13.2%
1996 $23,787,607 $3,272,335 13.8%
1997 $25,077,051 $2,783,2.27 .. 11.1%
1998 $25,69'6,105 $2,821,724 11.0%
1999 $29,657,939 $3,401,127 11.5%
(~) Excludes debt service
SOURCE: City of Federal Way Finance Department
City of Federal Way
Introduction
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
2000 Final Draft Section I - 6
<<INSERT PHOTO>>
SECTION II
COMMUNITY PROFILE
SECTION II
COMMUNITY PROFILE
REGIONAL LOCATION
Federal Way is located in the South
Central Puget Sound Region,
between Seattle and Tacoma.
Federal Way is approximately 25
miles south of Seattle and 8 miles
north of Tacoma's City Center.
The City is composed of 13,568
acres of land that stretch from South
272nd to the north and the Tacoma /
Pierce County border to the south,
Military Road to the east and Puget
Sound to the west.
Federal Way is served by Interstate
5, State Route 18 and State Route
167. The major arterials are Pacific
Hig,h, way South (HWY 9~9), South
320"' Street, South 336u' Street,
South 348th Street (Campus Drive),
21 st Avenue Southwest, State Route
161 (Enchanted Parkway), Military
Road, and State Route 509 (Dash
Point Road).
PLANNING AREA
Federal Way's planning area or
Potential Annexation Area (PAA
boundary) stretches from South
272nd to the north, to the Pierce
County line and the City of Milton
to the south, to West Valley
Highway to the east and Puget
Sound to the west. The planning
area contains a large
unincorporated area east of I-5.
POPULATION
CHARACTERISTICS
An analysis of population
characteristics is important
because age, income and
education are major determinants
of recreation interests.
The youth age groups tend to
participate in recreation activities
more frequently than any other
age group and they tend to favor
activities that are more active and
competitive in nature. This would
include activities such as
basketball, baseball, soccer,
football, swimming, bicycling, etc.
Young adults (ages 18-35) are
also an active age group and form
the core of adult competitive
sports. Adults (ages 35-65),
typically have less time to devote
to recreational activities and tend
to be more concerned about
maintaining a home and a job.
Recreational time is at a premium
and often limited to weekends and
occasional evenings.
According to the US Census, the
city's 1990 population was placed
at 67,554 persons. This is a 94%
increase from the 1980 population
of 34,788. The 1995 population
was 74,413 persons and in 1999,
the current population is 76,910
persons.
Marine Hills Neighborhood
City of Federal Wa),
Community Profile
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Final Draft 2000 Section II - 1
cit-), of
Federal Way
Federal Way,
Washington
DaM iPoin!
Legend:
~ Retail Areas
~ Parks
PUGET
SOUND
0 1,2 1 M~
0 1/2 1 ~
City Vicinity Map
City of Federal Way
Community Profile
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open St)ace Plan
Final Draft 2000 Section II - 2
Table 2 illustrates population growth for Federal Way as well as for King
County since 1960. As can be seen, the growth rate has risen
significantly over the last thirty years.
Table 2
Historical and Projected Population Growth 1960-2010
City of Federal Way and King County
1960 14,223 -- 935,014 --
1970 29,124 104.8% 1,156,633 23.7%
1980 34,788 19.5% 1,269,749 9.8%
1990 (~) 67,554 94.2% 1,507,319 18.7%
2000 (2) 76,910 13.8% 1,679,066 10.2%
2010 (3) 130,804 70.0% 1,840,172 8.7%
2020 (4) 147,616 12.8% 2,030,674 10.4%
(1) City of Federal Way was incorporated in 1990
(2) City of Federal Way Population, January 2000
(3) Puget Sound Regional Council, Projected Population in 2010
(4) Puget Sound Regional Council, Projected Population in 2020
Source: Puget Sound Regional Council
The demographic profile for Federal Way shown in Table 3 is slightly
different from the rest of King County. In general, the population as a
whole is significantly younger than the population of King County. An
analysis of the age groups indicates a higher percentage of people under
the age of 18. The demographic profile also indicates a significantly lower
percentage of people over the age of 65. Overall, the age distributions
suggests a younger age profile characterized by families with young
children.
Table 3
Age Distributions 1999
City of Federal Way
Under 18 27.0%
18-64 66.8%
65 and Over 6.2%
Median Age
Source: Puget Sound Regional Council
30.6
Ci_ty of Federal Way
Community Profile
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Final Draft 2000 Section II - 3
<Insert Photo>
SECTION III
EXISTING PARK AND RECREATION SERVICES
xECTION III
ISTING PARK AND
ECREATION SERVICES
INTRODUCTION
The primary goal of the Plan is to
assure that every neighborhood in
Federal Way is served by a park.
The City currently provides a level of
service of 10.7 acres per 1,000
population within the city limits. The
City's goal is to increase the level of
service to 10.9 acres per 1,000
population as Federal Way grows in
population and size. This section of
the report summarizes the different
types of parks in Federal Way and
the planning area.
PARK LAND DEFINITIONS
The existing parks and recreational
areas are divided into six
categories. Each category
represents a distinct type of
recreational activity or opportunity.
Please note that this classification
system is for the existing parks only.
Neighborhood Parks
Neighborhood parks are a
combination playground and park
designed primarily for non-
supervised, non-organized
recreation activities. They generally
range in size from 2-7 acres and
serve an area of approximately one-
half mile radius. Typically, facilities
found in a neighborhood park
include a children's playground,
picnic areas, trails, open grass
areas for passive use, outdoor
basketball courts and multi-use
sport fields for soccer, Little League
baseball, etc.
Community Parks
Community parks are planned
primarily to provide active and
structured recreation opportunities
for young people and adults. In
general, community park facilities
are designed for organized activities
and sports, although individual and
family activities are also
encouraged. Community parks
serve a much larger area and offer
more facilities. Their service area is
1-2 mile radius ranging in size from
15 to 25 acres.
Regional Parks
Regional parks are recreational
areas that serve the city and
beyond. They are usually large and
often include one specific use or
feature that makes it unique.
Special Use Areas
Special use areas are
miscellaneous public recreation
areas or park land. Examples are
312th Sport Court, city signs with
landscape medians, maintenance
yards, etc.
Trails
Trails are maintained areas that
generally follow a stream corridor,
ravine or some other elongated
feature, such as public right-of-
ways.
Undeveloped Land/Open Space
Areas
Undeveloped land/open space is
defined as undeveloped land left
primarily in its natural environment
designated for future park or open
space use. It is usually owned or
managed by a governmental agency
and may or may not have public
access. This type of land often
includes wetlands, steep hillsides or
other similar spaces. In some
cases, environmentally sensitive
areas are considered as open space
and can include wildlife habitats,
stream and creek corridors, or
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000 Section III - 1
unique and/or endangered plant
species.
Table 4
Summary of Existing City
Park and Recreation Areas
ci~::~f~Fed'emliWay:park Land CategOrieS:.'.:::
Neighborhood Parks
Community Parks
Regional Parks
Special Use Acreage
Trails Acreage
Park Facilities Acrea~le
Total Developed Park Land
Acres
129.0
218.0
0.0
7.5
95.5
21.0
471.0
Total Undeveloped Park Land
355.0
:TOTAL:PARK LAND in FEDERAL WAY ;: 826.0
I city of Federal Way Park, Recreation and Open Space Areas ]
City of Federal Way Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000 Section III - 2
Listed in the following tables is an inventory of the existing parks, recreation
facilities and open space areas found in the City of Federal Way. The
existing areas have been categorized according to the managing agency.
Table 5
Inventory of Existing City Developed
Park and Recreation Areas
(Acres rounded to the nearest tenth)
Adelaide 30619 16th Ave 7.0 Neighborhood Park; children's play
SW structure, tennis court, picnic area and
pathways. The site also includes a small
horse corral.
Alderbrook 32730 17th Ave 35.0 Neighborhood Park; children's play
SW structure, paved pathway, open lawn area
and wetlands.
Alderdale 2700 SW 340th . 2.0 Neighborhood Park; children's play
PL structure, picnic area, tennis court, open
lawn area and paved pathway.
BPA Trail Park 1100 s 324"' ST 67.5 Paved trail (1.8 mile) Trail connects
(Phase I and II) Celebration Park to the Weyerhaeuser King
County Aquatic Center.
Celebration 1095 s 324th ST 83.5 Community Park; Celebration Park Sports
Complex includes the following: 4-lighted
batting fields with bleachers, restroom and
concession building, 4-lighted soccer fields
with restrooms and concession building,
children's play structure, nature trails in
forested areas and pathways connecting to
the BPA Trails System and parking for 493
vehicles.
C0~onado 2501 SW 349th 1.5 Neighborhood Park children's play
PL structure, small basketball court and open
lawn areas.
Dash Point 5300 sw 324th 5.0 Neighborhood Park; children's play
Highlands ST structure and open lawn areas.
Dash Point 31200 sw Dash PT 0.3 City Flagpole, green landscaped area.
Triangle RD
Dumas Bay 30844 44th Ave 19.3 Neighborhood Park; 12-parking stalls,
sw unpaved trails leads to sandy beach front of
Puget Sound, and interpretive signs for the
large heron rookery located in the
greenbelt. The Washington State
Department of Fish and Wildlife monitors
the heron rookery annually.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000 Section III - 3
Dumas Bay 1200 sw Dash PT RD 12.0 Retreat and Conference Facility;
Centre ! conference and banquet rooms for business
Knutzen Family meetings, reunions and weddings with full
Theatre service catering, overnight
accommodations, 250-seat Knutzen Family
Theatre, landscaped grounds, views of
Puget Sound and the Olympic Mountains.
The site also hosts recreation and cultural
arts classes.
Federal Way 2800 s 320th ST 0.2 City Entrance S.ign, green landscaped
Entry Sign area.
French Lake 31531 1st Ave S 10.0 Neighborhood Park, open lawn area,
picnic area, play structure and 20 parking
stalls.
Heritage 28200 24th PL S 2.0 Neighborhood Park; unpaved pathway,
Woods open lawn area, picnic areas and protected
~reenbelt.
Hylebos / 630 s 356th ST 5.0 Open Space Area; natural open space
Blueberry Farm area, which includes the u-pick "Blueberry
Farm". Site includes unpaved trails and a
connection to Brook Lake.
Klahanee Lake 33901 9t~ Ave S 7.0 Park Facility; indoor gym, commercial
Community/ kitchen, offices and senior center.
Senior Center
Lake Grove 833 sw 308th 5.0 Neighborhood Park; children's play
ST structure, pathways and open lawn area.
Lake Killarney 3500 Weyerhaeuser 1 1.0 Neighborhood/Open Space Park;
Way S picnic areas, pathways and trails, lake front
access.
Lakota 31334 sw Dash PT 28.2 Community Park; 1-baseball field,
RD I-lighted softball field, 1-soccer field, 1-440
yard track, 1-football field and restroom.
Mirror Lake 915 s 315th ST 3.4 Neighborhood Park; children's play
structure, mini soccer field, picnic area,
open lawn area.
Olympic View 2900 sw 330th ST 21.0 Neighborhood Park; children's play
structure, open lawn area, trails, picnic area.
Palisades 5039 SW Dash PT RD 4.5 Neighborhood Park; children's play
structure, pathways and open lawn area.
Sacajawea 1401 s Dash PT RD 18.3 Community Park; 1-440 yard track, soccer/
football field, 2-lighted baseball fields,
children's play structure, and pathways.
Saghalie 33914 19th Ave SW 36.0 Community Park; 2-baseball fields,
I-lighted softball filed, 1-soccer field, 1-440
yard track, 2-lighted tennis courts,
1-basketball court, children's play structure
and paved pathways.
Steel Lake 2410 s 312th ST 52.0 Community Park; children's play structure,
sand volleyball pit, 5-picnic areas, swimming
beach, restroom and concession building,
100-parking stalls, open lawn areas.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000 Section III - 4
Steel Lake 31130 28th Ave 2.0 Parks Maintenance and Operations
Maintenance s Facility.
Facility
SW 312th lOO sw 312th 2.0 Special Use Area;
Sports Court ST 1-tennis court, 1-basketball court and
1-pickleball court.
West Campus 2oo s 320th ST 28.0 Trail; .87 miles of paved pathway.
Trail
Wildwood 2315 s 300th ST 2.3 Neighborhood Park; children's play
structure, open lawn area, paved pathway,
picnic area.
Total 471.0
Developed
Park Land
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000 Section III - 5
ExiSting open:sPaCe ~:Undeveloped Park Sites
Listed below is an inventory of existing open space / undeveloped sites within
the City of Federal Way.
Table 6
Inventory of Existing City Undeveloped
Park, Recreation and Open Space Areas
Federal Way
· '.:,,~ .... ~::."*, '. ~' i.: · ..Site . i i' · ". =..::?ii ' Acres Park Features
BPA Trail (Phase III) (1.3 miles) 22.5 Open Meadow,
Right-of-Way
Camelot Open Space 12.6 Wooded, wetland
Campus Open Space 2.6 Wooded
Dumas Bay Open Space 2.4 Wooded
Fisher's Pond 13.0 Pond, wooded
Heritage Open Space 6.1 Open meadow
Hylebos Open Space 38.1 Wooded, ravine
Lochaven Open Space 14.4 Wooded, ravine
Madrona Meadows Open 8.4 Pond, wetlands
Space
Marlbrook Open Space 2.1 Wooded
Meadows Open Space 3.3 Open meadow
Panther Lake Open Space 70.3 Wetlands, gravel
trails
Poverty Bay Open Space 48.0 Open space,
nature
undeveloped
Spring Valley Open Space 45.4 Wooded, wetlands
SW 363rd Open Space 5.1 Wooded, wetlands
Thompson Open Space 2.6 Wooded
Twin Lakes Vista Open 3.6 Wooded
Space
Village Green A & B 0.5
Wedgewood Open Space 2.0 Wooded, wetlands
West Campus Open Space 52.0 Wooded, wetlands
Total Open Space /
Undeveloped Sites 355.0
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Drait 2000 Section III - 6
City of
Federal Way
Park
System
FederaiWwParksa~[
PUGET
SOUND
o 1~ 1 Mk
0 1/2 I K]k)metm
Parks Map
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000 Section III - 7
I King County Park, Recreation and Open Space Areas
Table 7 list the developed park and recreation areas that are owned and
managed by King County Department of Natural Resources, Park Division.
Table 7
Inventory of King County Park, Recreational
and Open Space Lands
Federal Way Planning Area
I. '!'L ,Rec, reation Sites ' , Acres , ,- Facilities .....
Camelot Park * 16.3 Wetland, ravine
Five Mile Lake Park * 26.5 Tennis courts, basketball court,
swimming beach, gazebo,
picnic area, fishing pier,
restrooms, concession
building, kitchen/picnic shelter,
open play area, walking, track
Lake Geneva Park * 18.5 Fishing pier, picnic shelter,
open lawn, area, soccer fields,
restrooms, lake access and
trails.
Kenneth Jones Pool 0.5 Indoor pool
Puyallup Landfill * 30.0 Meadow
Weyerhaeuser King County Aquatic 10.6 Indoor pool, meeting / banquet
Center room and parking area
TOTAL 102.4
· Outside city limits
CJty of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000 Section III - 8
I Washington State Park, Recreation and Open Space Areas
Table 8 list the developed park and recreation areas that are owned and
managed by the Washington State Parks Department and the Washington
Department of Wildlife.
Table 8
Inventory of Washington State Park, Recreation,
and Open Space Areas
Federal Way Planning Area
':: '.. :.':' ~..i...Re~re~flon.$-it~s:-..~!=1, i:: . ,-:.:. :. , Acres.,.,-;--..:~ .. ,- Facilities
Dash Point State Park 230.0 Camping, swimming, beach, picnic
area, trail
Lake Dolloff Fishing Access * 1.3 .Lake fishing access
North Lake Fishing Access * 5.5 Boat launch, fishing pier
West H¥1ebos State Park 65.0 Pond, wetland, trail and
TOTAL 301.8
· Outside city limits
Federal Way School District #210 School Recreation Areas
Table 9 list the developed school sites that are owned and managed by the
Federal Way School District. Please note that the acreage listed only
accounts for the amount that is used for public recreation purposes. This
includes sports facilities, playground areas, open play areas, paved court
surfaces and a percentage of the parking area that is proportional to the size
of the recreation area (this is calculated at a ratio of 5 spaces per acre of
public recreation area).
Table 9
Inventory of Federal Way
School District #210 School Recreation Areas
Federal Way Planning Area
Elementary Schools
Adelaide Elementary School 4.8 Open play area, playground,
paved court
Brigadoon Elementary School 4.2 Open play area, playground,
paved court
Camelot Elementary School * (~) 5.0 Open play area, playground,
paved court
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Park~, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000 Section III - 9
Enterprise Elementary School (1) 5.0 Open play area, playground,
paved court
Green Gables Elementary School 5.9 Open play area, playground,
paved court
Lake Dolloff Elementary School * (~) 5.0 Open play area, playground,
paved court
Lake Grove Elementary School 5.8 Open play area, 2-Little League
fields, playground, paved court
Lakeland Elementary School * (4) 5.0 Open play area, playground,
paved court
Mark Twain Elementary School 2.8 Open play area, 2-Little League
fields, playground, paved court
Mirror Lake Elementary School 4.5 Open play area, playground,
paved court
Nautilus Elementary School 5.1 2-Little League fields, open field,
playground, paved court
Olympic View Elementary School 5.6 Little League field, open play field,
playground, paved court
Panther Lake Elementary School 5.2 Open play field, playground,
paved court
Rainier View Elementary School * (4) 5.0 Open play field, playground,
paved court
Sherwood Forest Elem. School 4.7 Open play field, playground,
paved court
Silver Lake Elementary School 5.3 Open play field, playground,
paved court
Twin Lakes Elementary School 5.1 Open play field, playground,
paved court
Valhalla Elementary School * (1) 5.0 Open play field, playground,
paved court
Wildwood Elementary School 3.7 Open play field, playground,
paved court
Subtotal 92.7
Junior High Schools
Illahee Junior High School 15.8 1-Baseball field (305' outfield),
1-softball field, 2-tennis court,
1-running track, 1-football field.
Kilo Junior High School * (1) 10.0 1-Baseball field, 1-softball field,
1-football field, 1-running track
Lakota Junior High School 5.7 12-Paved tennis courts
Sacajawea Junior High School 3.7 (See Sacajawea Park)
Saghalie Junior High School --- (See Saghalie Park)
Subtotal 35.2
High Schools
Decatur Senior High School 16.6 1-Baseball field (305' outfield), 1-
softball field, football field, track,
4-tennis courts.
Federal Way High School 21.4 1-Football stadium w/track,
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000 Section III - 10
practice field/track, 1-baseball
field, 1-softball field, 3-tennis
courts.
Thomas Jefferson High School * (1) 20.0 1-Baseball field (305' outfield), 1
softball field, 4-tennis courts, 1-
football field.
Truman High School 4.0 Open lawn area
Subtotal 62.0
TOTAL 189.9
· Outside city limits
(1) Assumes 50% of total acreage is
devoted to recreation purposes
City of Federal IVay
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000' Section III - 11
School District Facilities Map
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000 Section III - 12
I PHvate Recreation Facilities/Miscellaneous Facilities
Within the Federal Way planning area there are several associations and
organizations that provide non-profit recreation opportunities. The facilities
are listed in Table 10
Table 10
Summary of Private Outdoor Recreational Facilities in the
Federal Way Area
~;i:'.,~..'.: pai. ks/A:fea~Mi~..Fa~i'iities , :;:i;i l'.;3'i . .AoreS · :.. Activity/Facility
Camp Kilworth (Boy Scouts) * 52.0 Camping, trails, lodge
Christy's Golf Range Driving range, putting green,
9 hole - par 3 golf course
Enchanted Village/Wild Waves Rides, wading pond, picnic area,
miniature golf, water slides,
wave pool
Federal Way American Little League 2.6 Little League fields (2)
Federal Way National Little League 21.4 Little League fields (4)
Glendawn Bible Baptist Camp * 20.0 Camping, lodge, RV hook-up,
cabins, swimming beach,
baseball field, soccer field,
covered play area,
Mar Cheri Association 0.7 Outdoor pool
Marine Hills Rec. Assoc. 3.0 Tennis courts, pool
Ponce DeLeon Park 2.0 Open play area, lake access,
playground
Star Lake Boat Access * 0.3 Lake access
Twin Lakes Golf Course 120.0 Golf course, pool, iennis courts',
clubhouse
Treasure Island Park 4.8 Open play area, lake access,
playground
The Ridge Park 5.1 Open play area, playground
Weyerhaeuser Bonsai Garden .5 Bonsai garden, trail
Weyerhaeuser Rhododendron Garden 24.0 Rhododendron garden
TOTAL 256.4
· Outside City Limits
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000 Section III - 13
Table 11 lists the private organizations that offer commercial recreational
opportunities.
Table 11
Summary of Private Indoor Recreational Facilities in
Federal Way
[:',::. , _parks/Areas/MisC:'FaCilitles.
24 Hour Fitness
3ally Total Fitness
S. 316th Location)
Bally Total Fitness
(1~t Way S. Location)
Boys/Girls Club
Brooklake Community Center
Federal Way Senior Center
Gymnastics Unlimited
Pattison's West Skating Center
Secoma Bowling Lanes
, , Activity/Facility
Aerobic and weight room
Racquetball, gym, aerobic, lap pool and weight room
Racquetball courts, tennis courts, indoor track, lap pool
aerobics and weight room
Gym, game room, crafts room and library
Lodge and meeting hall
Meeting hall and lunch room
Gymnastics training
Indoor roller skating rink
32-bowling lanes, pro shop, restaurant, lounge
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000 Section III - 14
Table 12
Summary of Existing Sports Facilities
Federal Way Area
Baseball Fields
1 Decatur High School
,, 1 Federal Way High School
1 Kilo Junior High School *
1 Illahee Junior High School
1 Lakota Park 1 lighted
1 Sacajawea Park 1 lighted
1 Saghalie Park 1 lighted
1 Thomas Jefferson High School *
8 Total fields (3 lighted)
Softball Fields
4 Celebration Park 4 lighted
1 Illahee Junior High School
1 Kilo Junior High School *
1 Lakota Park 1 lighted
1 Sacajawea Park 1 lighted
1 Saghalie Park 1 lighted
2 Steel Lake Park 2 lighted
11 Total Fields (9 lighted)
Little League/Youth Softball ,,,
3 Adelaide Elementary
4 Brigadoon Elementary
3 Camelot Elementary *
4 Celebration Park 4 lighted
2 Federal Way American Little
League Complex
4 Federal Way National Little
League Complex
1 Glendawn Baptist Bible Camp *
4 Lakota Park
4 Lake Dolloff Elementary *
2 Lake Grove Elementary
4 Lakeland Elementary *
2 Mark Twain Elementary
2 Mirror Lake Elementary
2 Nautilus Elementary
3 Olympic View Elementary
3 Panther Lake Elementary
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000 Section III - 15
1 Rainier View Elementary *
2 SherwOod Forest Elementary
1 Steel Lake Park
2 Truman High School
2 Twin Lakes Elementary
4 Valhalla Elementary *
3 Wildwood Elementary
62 Total Fields
Soccer Fields
1 Adelaide Elementary
I Brigadoon Elementary
1 Camelot Elementary *
4 Celebration Park 4 lighted
1 Enterprise Elementary
1 Glendawn Baptist Bible Camp *
1 Green Gables Elementary
1 Lake Dolloff Elementary *
2 Lake Geneva Park *
1 Lake Grove Elementary
I Lakeland Elementary *
3 Lakota Park One is all-weather
I Mark Twain Elementary
1 Mastis Field
1 Mirror Lake Elementary
1 Nautilus Elementary
1 Olympic View Elementary
1 Panther Lake Elementary
1 Rainier View Elementary *
1 Sacajawea Park
1 Saghalie Park lighted; all weather
1 Sherwood Forest Elementary
1 Silver Lake Elementary
1 Steel Lake Park lighted; all weather
1 Truman High School
1 Twin Lakes Elementary
1 Valhalla Elementary *
1 Wildwood Elementary School
34 Total Fields
Football Fields
1 Decatur Senior High School
1 Federal Way Memorial Field 1 Stadium
1 Federal Way Senior High School
1 Kilo Junior High School *
1 Illahee Junior High School
1 Sacajawea Park
1 Saghalie Park 1-Lighted
City of Federal Way Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000 Section III - ! 6
1 T. Jefferson Senior High School *
8 Total Fields
Tennis Courts
Public Tennis Courts
1 Alderdale Park
1 Adelaide Park
4 Decatur High School
.... 3 Federal Way High School
2 Five Mile Lake Park *
1 Illahee Junior High
2 Lakota Wastewater Treatment
Plant
2 Sacajawea Park Lighted
4 Sa~halie Park Lighted
4 Thomas JeffersOn High School *
1 SW 312th Sports Court Park
25 Subtotal
Private Tennis Courts
6 Bally Total Fitness Club Membership Required
(1st Way S. Location)
2 Twin Lakes Golf Course
8 Subtotal
33 Total Courts
Racquetball Courts
16 Bally Total Fitness Club Membership Required
16 Total Courts
Swimming Pools
2 Bally Total Fitness 22 Meter Lap Pool
75 Meter Lap Pool
1 Federal Way Pool (Kenneth 6 lane, 25 yard "T"
Jones Pool)
1 Marine Hills Recreation 25'Yard Outdoor Pool
Association
3 Weyerhaeuser King County 50 Meter Pool, 25" Meter
Aquatic Center Pool, Diving Tank
1 Twin Lakes Golf Club 25 Meter Outdoor
1 Mar Cheri Association Pool
9 Total Pools
Tracks
1 Decatur High School 1 All Weather
1 Federal Way Memorial Field 1 All Weather
1 Saghalie Jr. High School 1 All Weather
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000 Section III - 17
1 Federal Way High School 1 Cinder
1 Five Mile Lake Park * 1 Jogging Trail
1 Kilo Junior High School * 1 Cinder
1 Illahee Junior High School 1 Cinder
1 Lakota Park 1 Cinder
1 Bally Total Fitness 1 Indoor Track
1 Sacajawea Park 1 Cinder
1 Thomas Jefferson High School * 1 Cinder
11 Total Tracks
· Outside City limits
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Existing Park and Recreation Services Final Draft 2000 Section III - 18
<Insert Photo>
SECTION IV
RECREATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT
SECTION IV
RECREATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT
INTRODUCTION
In 1990, the Comprehensive Recreation Needs Assessment was completed as part
of the city's first park and recreation planning process.
The first random household survey was conducted to solicit public opinion toward
parks and recreation services in Federal Way. The top responses to the 1990
survey were:
· Need more park areas in Federal Way.
· Public concerns regarding poor conditions of existing parks.
· Organized sports an important recreation activity in Federal Way.
· A community / recreation center ranked high on the park project list needed in
Federal Way as well as teen programs, sports fields, trails and a performing arts
facility.
· Need more beautification projects within the city's streets and downtown areas.
DEPARTMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS 1990- 1999
Within the first ten years, the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department
has made tremendous progress and accomplishments to existing and new park
facilities in Federal Way. The following is a list of the major accomplishments from
1990 to 1999.
Acquisition of 292 acres of park land
23 park renovation projects
14 park development projects
$22 million for park capital improvement projects, major park developments
include:
Celebration Park
Knutzen Family Theatre
Public Art at Steel Lake Park, Klahanee Lake Community / Senior Center
and Dumas Bay Centre.
Lake Killarney Open Space Park
BPA Trail (Phase I and II)
Steel Lake Park Beach Front
Saghalie Park
Klahanee Lake Community / Senior Center
Coronado Park
Alderbrook Park
AIderdale Park
City partnerships include:
Federal Way School District Interlocal Agreement
Federal Way Youth Soccer Association Interlocal Agreement
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -1
Historical Society / Friends of the Hylebos
Highline Community College
Federal Way Community Council / Family Fest
Major Events sponsored by the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Department:
Red, White and Blues Festival
Summer Concert Series in the Park
Steel Lake Fishing Derby
· Volunteer work parties averaged 1,000 plus hours annually on park projects.
1999 PARKS AND RECREATION SURVEY
In November 1999, the second parks and recreation survey was conducted to
assess the community's need regarding the Federal Way's park and recreation
services.
New methods were used in conducting the 1999 survey, compared to the "Door to
Door" method used in 1990. The methods used in 1999 to notify citizens included;
press release to local newspaper, Internet access through the City's web page,
Television notice through the Government Access Channel FWTV 28, Telephone
survey to 120 randomly selected households and 1,200 surveys mailed to randomly
selected households. Citizens responded in the following ways: 32% of the
responses were via the US Mail, 30% through the City's web page and the rest
responded via the telephone survey or by dropping the surveys off directly to city
hall. The results of this survey are as follows:
lWhen asked; "What three Federal Way PRCS facilities/programs have you used in J
the last year?" The top responses were:
· Steel Lake Park
· Celebration Park
· Dumas Bay Centre
· Knutzen Family Theatre
· Saghalie Park
lWhen asked: "What community events have you attended within the last 12
months?" The top responses were:
· Red, White and Blues Festival
· Summer Concerts
· Fishing Derby at Steel Lake Park
· Spring Egg Hunt
· Fall Carnival
JWhen asked: "What do you feel are the three most important facilities or recreation
programs needed in Federal Way?" The top responses were:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
City of Federal Way
New Community / Recreation Center
Skate Board Park
Performing Arts Center (1,000 + seats)
More Sports Fields
Teen and Youth Programs
Ice Skating Rink
More Neighborhood Parks
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -2
When asked: "What do you feel are the most needed improvements in the existing
parks?" The top responses were:
· More Restrooms
· More Security in Parks
· Sports Lighting at Sacajawea and Lakota
· Higher Level of Maintenance
· Park for "Little" Kids
· No Improvements
When asked: "With Federal Way's population growing each year, should Federal
Way provide more parks and recreation facilities to accommodate these increased
demands?" The response was:
· 75% Yes
IWhen asked: "What type of new revenue sources would you be willing to support?"
Top responses were:
· 57% favored a voter approved bond
· 32% favored a park / recreation impact / user fee
· 15% other funding sources
DEVELOPING RECREATION NEEDS FOR FEDERAL WA Y
One method of measuring need is to develop a standard and measure that standard
against the existing inventory. Recreation standards are guides by which
communities may estimate in quantifiable terms the number of acres of facilities
required to meet recreational demands in an area. By attaching the standard to a
population variable, it is easy to forecast future needs as the population grows.
Standards are important for many reasons including:
· Standards can be an expression of minimum acceptable facilities and areas.
They can be looked upon as goals.
· A standard is a guideline to determine land requirements for various kinds of park
and recreation areas and facilities.
· Standards are a basis for comparing the recreation needs to the existing park
land within a community.
PARK LAND NEEDS
Assessing Park Land Needs
Developing a statement of land needs for park areas and open space is the most
difficult of all types of needs analysis because it is dependent upon so many
community values and variables. This plan calculates the public recreation land and
school playgrounds, not including private landscape areas and other similar open
space.
City of Federal Way Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -3
To determine specific land needs for Federal Way, several analytical methods were
used. These included a comparison to the National Recreation and Park
Association (NRPA) Standards, comparison to other similar communities, an
analysis of existing and potential park land and a look at areas of Federal Way that
are not now being served. The 1983 NRPA report titled "Recreation, Park and Open
Space Standards and Guidelines" represents the most recent consensus on space
and facility standards at the national level.
When applying a standard of open space, one must take into account the current
inventory and the likely prospect of acquiring future parkland. For instance, if a
community is fully developed, it would be unreasonable to recommend a much
higher standard than what exists.
One important method used to identify neighborhood and community park needs for
Federal Way was to analyze the current service areas and identify those
neighborhoods not currently being served. The service area of a neighborhood park
is generally considered to be about a one half-mile radius and that for a community
park at a one mile radius. Of course, many factors will influence the service area
such as physical boundaries, population densities, etc. Once the areas were
identified that are, currently not being served it was then a matter of forecasting the
number of park sites (under ideal conditions) needed to fill the voids.
Below are the recommended standards for specific types of park areas.
Neighborhood Park Needs
Analysis:
The service area of a neighborhood park is considered a half-mile radius. This
service area does not take into account physical boundaries such as freeways,
topographic features, etc. that may influence the actual service areas. An analysis
of a park service areas was made utilizing circles representing a half-mile radius.
The results indicated that many neighborhoods are currently not being served. In
order to cover the entire area under ideal conditions, approximately 11 additional
neighborhood parks would be needed. This information was part of the basis for
developing the neighborhood park standard.
Recommendation:
NRPA Standard
1-2 Acres/1,000 Population
Present Inventory (city limits only-1999)
127.8 Acres
Present ratio (city limits only-1999):.
1.7 Acres/1,000 Population
Recommended Standard:
1.7 Acres/1,000 Population
Comments:
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -4
The above standard of 1.7 acres per 1,000 population means that Federal Way is
currently meeting the recommended standard. Using the 2010 population
projection, the total neighborhood parkland needed will be 217.3 acres to serve
Federal Way.
Community Park Needs
Analysis:
Currently, there are five community parks in the planning area.
The service area of a community park is considered to be roughly a mile to a mile
and a half radius, depending on external barriers. The community park service area
analysis revealed that much of the south and extreme northeast areas of Federal
Way planning area have the greatest need for community parks.
Recommendation:
NRPA Standard:
Present Inventory (city limits only-1999)
Present Ratio (city limits only-1999)
Recommended Standard:
5-8 acres/1,000 population
217.7 Acres
2.8-acres/1,000 population
2.8-acres/1,000 population
Comments:
The above standard of 2.8 acres per 1,000 population means that Federal Way is
currently meeting the recommended standard. In the year 2010, the total community
parkland needed would be 370.3 acres to serve Federal Way.
Regional Parks Needs
Analysis:
Currently, there are two regional parks in the planning area. Both are owned and
operated by the Washington State Parks Commission.
Dash Point State Park maintains a large camping area, which draws people from
throughout the state. To this point, it serves more than just the Tacoma/Federal
Way area. West Hylebos State Park is primarily a wetlands area and is designed to
provide trails and interpretative areas. Its regional impact is much smaller than Dash
Point State Park.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -5
Recommendation:
NRPA Standard:
Present Inventory (city limits only-1999):
Present Ratio (city limits only-1999):
Recommended Standard:
5-10 acres/1,000 population'
295.00 acres
4.0 acres/1,000 population
2.6 acres/1,000 population
Comments:
The recommended standard of 2.6 acres per 1,000 population means that the
Washington State Parks Commission is currently meeting the recommended
standard. In the year 2010, the total regional parkland needed would be 501.7 acres
to serve Federal Way, based on the needs assessment formula.
Trails
Analysis:
Currently, two sites fit this category. They are the BPA Trail and West Campus Trail.
Recommendation:
~NRPA Standard:
No National Standard
Present Inventory (city limits only-1999)
Present Ratio (citY limits only-1999):
Recommended Standard:
95.3 acres
1.2 acres/1,000 Population
2.2 acres/1,000 Population
Comments:
The existing ratio of 1.2 acres per 1,000 population represents about 95.3 acres of
land. Based on the recommended standard, a total of 159.6 acres of land is
presently needed. The City currently owns an additional 22.5 acres of undeveloped
BPA right-of-way that would meet a portion of this need once it is developed. By the
year 2010, there will be a total need for 288 acres of trails.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -6
Open Space Needs
Analysis:
In the Federal Way area, a large amount of land is devoted just to open space.
Currently, there are 354.7 acres of open space land within the planning area.
Recommendation:
NRPA Standard:
Present Inventory (city limits only-1999)
Present Ratio (city limits only-1999)
Recommended Standard:
No National Standard
354.7 acres
4.6 acres/1,000 Population
6.0 acres/1,000 Population
Comments:
The 6.0 acres per 1,000 population is an increase over what now exists. However,
this is only a small fraction of the number of acres that could be preserved. A
majority of this type of land is wetlands and steep hillsides that are not suitable for
development.
The standard of 6.0 acres per 1,000 population means that 107 additional acres
should be acquired. Using the population projection for the year 2010, a total of 785
acres will be needed.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -7
Total Park Land
Analysis:
In 2000, there is a total of 823.7 acres of park and open space land, within the City
of Federal Way, which includes 14 neighborhood parks, 5 community parks, 2 major
trail systems, 4 special use areas, 3 park facilities and 354.7 acres of undeveloped /
open space areas.
There is a total of 1,430.1 acres of public open space land in the Federal Way
Planning Area (PAA), which includes land owned by the City of Federal Way, King
County, State of Washington and the Federal Way School District. When future
annexations occur in the eastern section of the Federal Way Planning Area, the
inventory of public open space land will maintain the city's level of service of 10.9
acres per 1,000 population until the year 2010.
Recommendation:
NRPA Standard:
Present Inventory (city limits only-1999)
Present Park Ratio (city limits only-1999)
Recommended Standard:
15-20 acres/1,000 population
823.7 acres
10.7 acres/1,000 Population
10.9 acres/1,000 Population
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -8
2000 Parks and Recreation Level of Services Summary Chart
Table 13
city of Fede'tal.Way. Acres .2000 .. City Current Variance
Parks and Re.Creation Area City of.ii.. ReCOmmended City
: '.'"i~'-.' Federal Way . Standard Level of
. · ...: .': : ,. Populatioh "~: . Service
Categodes ..
Neighborhood Parks 129.0 76,910 1.7 1.7 (0.0)
Community Parks 218.0 76,910 2.8 2.8 0.0'
Trail Acreage 95.5 76,910 2.2 1.2 (1.0)
Special Use Acreage 7.5 76,910 1.8 0.1 (1.7)
Park Facilities Acreage 21 76,910 N/A N/A N/A
::'.'. "';('" :'~'.~.'~. =' . '" '" ,." r. = '=" ' '
TOtal"!Devel~i~:::i!i~!i:.'::.'-'...'::~..?,:i.;:....471!0 , .7;6;910 ",:. ::i:i.. '..:.,...
Park",~and'::!!:~"'".:L{:::!~i'i.::~.':'. . ¥:::' ..... . ...,~.... :' .,?:.. 6.1 6.1
Total'Unde~i~l~l:''~!:'.''''''''~" ' ':':. ..........· : .... ': ~'~ ':'""' .... : =
'ParkLand:. ',i.::~.;::,i,,?:_~.: '.~....'... :~, .. ,355.0 .': .'.. · 76,9!.0 .':i.i: :.:.. ':,:: ~' .:. - { .. .... 4,6 (1 ;4)
Total-Park Land' 826.0 76,910 10.9 10.7 (0.2)
2000 City of Federal Way Population: 76,910
2000 Level of Service: 10.7 acres per 1,000 population
ATHLETIC FA ClLITY NEEDS
Establishing needs for specialized facilities such as sport fields, trail systems,
swimming pools, etc. was also derived from several analytical approaches. This
included the present recreation participation levels and needs expressed in the
survey, from the NRPA Standards, from input from user groups, from trends
identified in national surveys, from sport field team levels and play requirements and
from mathematical models developed by other work-related professionals.
While private facilities satisfy a certain need, they do not satisfy .100% of the public
need. Therefore, only a portion of their credit was given when counting the existing
inventory. Starting below are recommendations for specialized recreation facilities.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -9
Tennis Courts
Analysis:
There are 25 tennis courts in Federal Way located at school sites, parks and at
Lakehaven's facility. In addition, there are ten indoor courts found in private clubs.
Not included in this inventory are the occasional tennis courts found in apartment
complexes or other housing projects.
For purposes of analysis, we will give 25% credit to the private tennis courts
facilities. This credit represents an addition of 2.5 courts for of total of 28 courts.
Out of the 28 courts in the Federal Way planning area, six courts are outside the
current city limits.
Recommendations:
NRPA Standard:
Present Inventory (city only-1999):
Present Facility Ratio (city only-1999):
Recommended Standard:
1 court per 2,000 population
22 courts (2 lighted)
1 court per 3,496 population
1 court per 2,500 population
Comments:
Based on the recommended standard, 31 courts are currently needed. This
represents a need for an additional eight courts. Using the population projection for
the year 2010, 38 courts will be needed to service Federal Way.
Adult Softball Fields
275-300' outfield for slow pitch; 225' for men's fast pitch and 250' outfield for women's slow
pitch.
Analysis:
Most of the adult softball programs in Federal Way area are managed by the Federal
Way Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department. In addition to these
programs, the City provides field space for South King County Modified Softball
organization and the Weyerhaeuser corporation. There are 160 adult softball teams.
CDrrently, there are eleven softball fields in the Federal Way planning area. Ten are
within the city limits and one in the planning area. Nine of the fields are lighted.
The best approach we have found to identify present need is to compare supply and
demand. Lighted fields (5) will accommodate 3 games a night (4 nights a week) or
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -10
60 games per week. Unlighted fields accommodate two games a night (4 nights a
week) or eight games per week. Softball leagues play four nights a week with
weekends reserved for tournaments. Assuming two games per week, we have the
following:
87 games per week demand
68 present supply fields can accommodate
Based on the current scheduling system, there is a deficit of 19 games a week. It is
possible to gain an additional 17 games a week by scheduling games on Fridays or
Sunday evenings. However, there would still be a slight shortage of fields.
Recommendation:
NRPA Standard:
Present Inventory (city only-1999)
Present Facility Ratio (city only-1999):
Recommended Standard:
1 field per 5,000 population
10 fields (9 lighted)
1 field per 8,545 population
1 field per 7,000 population
Comments:
Based on the recommended standard, 4 additional fields are needed. Using the
population project for the year 2010, 15 additional softball fields will be needed.
Youth Baseball/Softball Fields
Little league, pony league and T-ball; 200' foul line
Analysis:
There are 62 youth baseball and softball fields in the Federal Way planning area. Of
the 62 fields, 57 fields are in the Federal Way city limits.
In Federal Way, there are three youth baseball programs: The Federal Way
American Little League, The Federal Way National League and the Steel Lake Little
League. They represent 147 teams. In addition, there are 68 youth softball teams,
and 35 Boys/Girls Club softball teams. That represents 250 teams who utilize the
City's and School District's batting fields.
Like softball, the best approach we have found to identify present need is to
compare supply and demand. The 57 fields accommodate 1 game a night (5 nights
a week) and six games on Saturday for 11 games per week. Assuming two games
per week and one practice, we have the following:
500 games/practice per week demand
462 present games fields can accommodate
City of Federal Way Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -11
Recommendations:
INRPA Standard:
Inventory (city only-1999)
Present
IPresent Facility Ratio (city only-1999)
Recommended Standard:
1 field per 5,000 population
57 fields (4 lighted)
I field per 1,349 population
1 field per 1,500 population
Comments:
Using the population projection for the year 2010, 30 additional fields will be needed.
Soccer Fields
Field Dimensions: youth soccer 55 x 100 yards;
adult soccer 65 x 110 yards; championship soccer 75 x 120 yards
Analysis:
Soccer has become a very popular sport in the Puget Sound area. This is especially
true in Federal Way. Soccer is offered by two organizations, an adult and a youth
program. There are approximately 200 teams.
Soccer teams play two games per week and two practice sessions per week. Two
teams share one field for practice sessions. The youth program creates a demand
for about equivalent games per week. Soccer is played four nights a week (one
game per night) plus five games on Saturday. Each soccer field can accommodate
up to 9 games per week. Based on this, we have the following:
300 Present games per week demand
225 Present games fields can accommodate
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -12
Recommendations:
NRPA Standard:
Present Inventory (city limits only-1999)
Present Facility Ratio (city limits only-1999)
Recommended Standard:
1 field per 10,000 population
28 fields (6 lighted)
1 field per 2,958 population
1 field per 2,300 population
Comments:
Based on the recommended standard, 6 additional fields are needed. Using the
population project for the year 2010, 29 additional soccer fields will be needed to
serve Federal Way.
Football Fields
Analysis:
There are 9 football fields in the Federal Way planning area, 7 football fields are
located inside the city limits.
The Federal Way youth football program is provided by the Federal Way Junior
Football Association.
Recommendations:
NRPA Standard:
Present Inventory (city limits only-1999)
Present Facility Ratio (city limits only-1999)
Recommended Standard:
I field per 20,000 population
7 fields (2 lighted)
1 field per 10,987 population
I field per 10,000 population
Comments:
Based on the recommended standard, there are no fields needed for the year 2000.
Using the population project for the year 2010, 13 additional fields will be needed to
serve Federal Way.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -13
Gymnasium Space
Junior high - 74'x42'; high school - 84'x50'; collegiate - 94'x50'
Analysi.s:
In the Federal Way planning area, there are 37 gymnasiums. Of this total, nine are
located outside the city limits. With the exception of the gym at Klahanee Lake
Community / Senior Center, all of the gyms are located at school district facilities.
The Federal Way Parks, Recreation and Cultural Service Department offer both a
basketball and volleyball program. These programs utilize the school district
gymnasiums and the gym at Klahanee Lake Community / Senior Center. The Boys
and Girls Club offers a youth program. There are190 basketball teams and 25
volleyball teams.
For basketball, each team plays one game a week and averages two practices a
week. Teams can practice on a half court. Two games per night can be played five
nights a week for 10 games per week. For volleyball, each team plays once a week.
Four matches per night can be played five nights a week. Based on this, we have:
285 Present games per week demand-Basketball
12.5 Present games per week demand-Volleyball
280 Present games fields can accommodate
Recommendations:
NRPA Standard:
1 court per 50,000 population
Present Inventory (city limits only-1999)
28 gyms
Present Facility Ratio (city limits only-1999) I gymnasium per 2,747 population
Recommended Standard:
1 gymnasium per 2,500 population
Comments:
The above analysis indicates a shortage of gym space. Based on the recommended
standard, 3 additional gyms are needed for the year 2000. Using the population
projection for the year 2010, 24 additional gyms will be needed.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -14
Trails
Analysis:
There are only two public trails in Federal Way. The West Campus Trail is about 1.5
miles in length and the BPA trail is 1.8 miles in length. There are a number of
potential trail locations, including an extension of the BPA trail.
Recommendations:
NRPA Standard
Present Inventory:
Present Facility Ratio:
Recommended Standard:
No Standard
2.6 miles (off-street)
.03 miles per 1,000 population
0.20 miles per 1'000 population
Comments:
Based on the recommended standard, 15 miles are needed in the year 2000. Using
the population projection for the year 2010, an additional 23.4 miles of trails will be
needed.
Swimming Beaches
Includes freshwater and saltwater beaches
Analysis:
There are five public freshwater beaches and three saltwater beaches. They are:
FRESHWATER BEACHES
Lake Geneva 660 lineal feet
Five Mile Lake 1,980 lineal feet
Steel Lake Park 1,320 lineal feet
Lake Killarney 200 lineal feet
North Lake 300 lineal feet
SALTWATER BEACHES
Dumas Bay 600 lineal feet
Redondo Bay 500 lineal feet
Dash Point State Park 600 lineal feet
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -15
Recommendations:
NRPA Standard
Present Inventory:
Present Facility Ratio:
Recommended Standard:
No Standard
6,160 lineal feet of beach
80 LF per 1,000 population
100.8 LF per 1,000 population
Comments:
The above analysis is for beach use. The recommended standard reflects the
potential of developing additional beach areas along existing lakes and along the
existing salt water parks. The formula we have developed for identifying the
quantitative need for swimming beaches is shown below. The total annual
occasions shown are for outdoor swimming.
A.Total participation:
B.% of use on average peak day:
C.% who wish to use beach:
D.Occasions per lineal ft.:
E.Turnover rate:
778,680 occasions
1.5%
80%
0.5
2
Formula: A x B x C = 9,344 lineal feet of beach presently needed
DxE
Standard: 100.8 lineal feet per 1,000 population
Source: King County Aquatics
Swimming Pools (indoors)
25 meter 6 lane pool = 3,608 sq. ft. water area; 25 yard x 25 meter ell pool = 4,996 sq. ft. water
area; 50 meter x 8 lane pool = 8,610 sq. ft. water area.
Analysis:
Experience has shown us that a swimming pool should be designed to
accommodate about 60% of the average daily attendance at one time. This
standard will comfortably meet peak hour demand. In addition, 75% of the total
swimming activity will occur in shallow water (5 feet or less). This data now gives us
the information to develop the following formula:
Shallow Water Demand
Multiply 42,000 monthly swims x 75% = 31,500 shallow swims
Divide by average of 30 days per month = 1,050 daily swims
City of Federal V~ray
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -16
Multiply by the 60% peak load factor= 630 peak swimmers
Multiply by 12 sq. ft. per swimmer = 7,560 sq. ft. water area demand
Deep Water Demand
Multiply 42,000 monthly swims x 25% = 10,500 deep water swims
Divide by average of 30 days per month = 350 daily swims
Multiply by the 60% peak load factor= 210 peak swimmers
Multiply by 27 sq. ft. per swimmer= 5,760 sq. ft. water area demand
Source: King County Aquatics
Recommendations:
NRPA Standard:
Present Inventory:
Present Facility Ratio:
Recommended Standard:
1 pool per 20,000 population
11,445 sq. ft. *
149 sq. ft. surface water
per 1,000 population
142.7 sq. ft. per 1,000 population
* Present inventory includes 54% of the King County Kenneth Jones Pool, 100% of
the recreation tank and 30% of the competitive tank at the King County
Weyerhaeuser Aquatic Center and an allowance of 2,000 square feet of pool water
area at the private clubs.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -17
Golf Courses
(includes private clubs)
Analysis:
In Federal Way, recreational golf participation is about 23% above average. There
is one pdvate 18-hole golf course in the Federal Way. Within a 10-mile radius, there
are 2 public and 1 private golf. courses.
In King County, there is one 18-hole golf course per 51,000 persons.
Recommendations:
NRPA Standard:
1 public golf course per 50,0000 population
Existing Inventory:
1 private 18-hole golf course per 76,910
population
Recommended Standard:
1 public golf course per 50,000 population
Comments:
There are no public courses in the Federal Way Planning Area. The closest golf
course is located in Northwest Tacoma. North Shore Golf and County Club is a
privately owned and operated 18 hole golf course that is open to the public.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Recreation Needs Assessment Final Draft 2000 Section IV -18
<Insert Photo>
SECTION V
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
!SECTION V
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
INTRODUCTION
A very important element in this study was to determine what types and levels of
recreation services should be offered by the City. This is reflected in the following
goals and objectives.
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Goals and objectives are statements which an agency wishes to achieve. They
provide direction for providing services. They can also be a means of evaluating the
success of a program. Shown below are goals and objectives for the City's
Department of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services.
Definitions:
A"goal is astatement of the City's aspirations as it relates to park and
recreation serVices. It is'the desirable quality that the City wishes to achieve,
A'goal muSt be realistic and flexible enough to allow a discussion of how iris
to be achieved~ ." Goals are long range and usually remain unchanged
throughout the.practical life of the plan. '~
I Objectives'are working and measurable statements,'' which identify specific
Isteps, needed to achieve the stated goal.. Often one. goal will have a number of
Iobjectives. . ' . ': : ' · .
Goal #1:
Operate the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department in a fiscally
responsible and creative manner.
Objectives:
Continue as the primary coordinating agency between the city and the
State, County and School District for recreation services in Federal Way.
Continue partnership with the school district to utilize school facilities for
recreational purposes.
3. Provide adequate staff to meet recreation needs of residents.
Establish a maintenance management plan to the approved level of
service.
Explore opportunities to coordinate maintenance operations with other
agencies or with individual or groups of volunteers.
o
Continue to seek external funding for one-time or on-going parks and
recreation programs and facilities.
Explore park user fees to recover program cost or to reduce the
department's cost of operating a program or facility, which may also
include capital improvement projects
GOAL # 2:
Protect and enhance parks, recreation sites and public green spaces_
Objectives:
Upgrade existing parks and develop new sites to provide a variety of
recreation activities serving a wide range of user groups.
Develop and maintain a high quality of improvements for parks and
recreation sites.
Distribute park facilities throughout City of Federal Way neighborhoods,
as far as it is practical.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Goals and Objectives Final Draft 2000 Section V -3
Require that developers adhere to City code establishing minimum
standards for on-site parks and open space.
Preserve areas with critical or unique natural features, such as streams
corridors, wildlife habitats, shorelines and wetlands, especially if
threatened by development.
Goal # 3:
Provide well-designed, developed and maintained parks and recreation
facilities that offer leisure opportunities for citizens of all ages and interests.
Objectives:
Budget adequate funding for maintenance and staffing needs based on
public usage of facilities.
Maintain park and recreation facilities as safe, attractive, and positive
amenities to the community.
Acquire and preserve land for park and recreational use; fund
development as appropriate.
Goal # 4:
Encourage citizen involvement in the park and recreation planning process.
Objectives:
Monitor park and recreation needs and trends through questionnaires,
surveys and public meeting.
Create a volunteer/sponsor program for one-time and on-going parks
and recreation activities or projects.
Obtain citizen response to specific programs, facilities and policies as an
integral part of the decision-making process.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Goals and Objectives Final Draft 2000 Section V -4
Goal # 5:
Promote the philosophy that investing in the City's unique and diverse
recreational opportunities and natural resources will realize outstanding returns
for the quality and prosperity of urban life.
Objectives:
1. Maintain a high profile in the community to help promote the leisure
services programs.
2. Continue public relations and publicity efforts to inform citizens of the
recreational opportunities available.
3. Promote the economic impact of parks and recreation programs that
contribute financial benefits to the community.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Goals and Objectives Final Draft 2000 Section V -5
<Insert Photo>
SECTION VI
DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA AND DESIGN
GUIDELINES
SECTION VI
DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA AND DESIGN GUIDELINES
INTRODUCTION
The following policies and design standards apply to the acquisition and/or
development of parks, open space areas, trail systems and specialized facilities.
Once adopted by the City, they will help guide the Parks and Recreation
Commission, the Planning Commission and City Council on issues dealing with
the acquisition and development of park sites and open space areas.
[ NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Criteria and Guidelines:
NP-1. A neighborhood park should be developed when the area it serves
reaches 50% developed (measured by either landmass or population).
NP-2. It should be 3-10 acres in size. The City may accept smaller parcels for
neighborhood parks in areas where little vacant land is available.
NP-3. At least 50% of the site should be fiat and usable and open for both active
and passive uses.
NP,4. Appropriate facilities include:
(a) Children's playground
(b) Unstructured open play area for general recreation use and practice
games
(c) Paved games court
(d) Picnic area
(e) Trail system
(f) Natural open space
(g) Drainage corridors
(h) Other possible facilities: restrooms, picnic shelters, buildings, tennis
courts
NP-5. Facilities generating crowd noise should be located in a manner so as not
to disturb adjoining residential areas.
NP-6. Parking requirements: Minimum of 3 spaces per acre of active park area.
The design should encourage access by foot or bicycle.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Development Criteria & Design Guidelines Final Draft 2000 Section VI - 1
NP-7.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Site selection criteria:
The site should be central to the area it serves.
The site should be adjacent to other open space areas or trail systems, if
possible.
If possible, walking distance should not exceed one-half mile for the area it
serves. The need to cross major arterial streets or other physical barriers
should be discouraged.
The site should be readily visible and have significant street frontage.
Access to the site should be via a local residential street. If located on a
busy artedal street, appropriate fencing and other safety steps should be
taken.
COMMUNITY PARKS
Cdteda and Guidelines:
CP-1. A community park should be developed when the area it serves reaches
60% developed.
CP-2. Acquisition of community park sites should occur far in advance of its
actual need.
CP-3. Minimum size should be 15 acres, with the optimum being about 25 acres.
CP-4. At least ten acres of the site should be usable for active recreation use.
CP-5. Appropriate facilities include:
(a) Formal ballfields - softball, baseball, soccer, etc.
(b) Tennis courts
(c) Open free play area
(d) Restroom facility
(e) Picnic facilities
(f) Trail systems
(g) Landscaped gardens
(h) Outdoor basketball courts
(i) Children's playground (if needed to also serve the neighborhood)
(j) Natural open space
(k) Indoor recreational facilities such as a recreation center, senior center,
tennis center etc.
(I) Outdoor sand volleyball courts
(m)Space for special outdoor events
CP-6. Parking requirements: dependent upon the activities. Use 50 spaces per
ballfield or 5 spaces per acre of active use.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Development Criteria & Design Guidelines Final Draft 2000 Section VI - 2
CP-7.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Site selection criteria:
The site should be reasonably central to the area it serves.
The park should be located on an arterial or collector street and have
significant street frontage.
If possible, some of the site should have a natural area or heavy
landscape setback to help buffer active uses from residential areas.
(d) Heavily wooded sites are acceptable but will require considerable clearing
to accommodate the active uses.
(e)
Environmentally sensitive sites can be a part of this type of park if
protected from active visitor use.
Criteria and Guidelines:
RP-1.
The Regional Park should be designed to meet a wide range of activities
and interests but can also emphasize a natural feature that makes the site
unique.
RP-2. If the site will attract large volumes of traffic, access should be via a
collector or arterial street.
RP-3. Possible facilities include:
(a) Viewpoints
(b) Trail systems
(c) Special facilities for the physically disabled
(d) Picnic areas
(e) Open play areas
(f) Water access facilities
(g) Nature interpretative areas
(h) Sport facilities
(i) Group picnic areas
(j) Specialized play equipment
RP-4. Parking requirements are dependent upon the activities offered.
RP-5. Location Criteria
(a) Location is most often determined by the features it can offer.
(b) Access should be from an arterial street if traffic volumes are expected to
be high.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Development Criteria & Design Guidelines Final Draft 2000 Section VI - 3
(c) Heavily wooded sites can be appropriate.
(d) Environmentally sensitive sites are appropriate if protected from active
visitor use.
~"~ECIAI.:. : USE AREAS
Cdteria and Guidelines:
SUA-1. Prior to acquiring or developing any special use area, the City should
first determine the maintenance and operation costs.
SUA-2. Parking and access requirements should be determined by the type of
activity proposed.
Criteria and Guidelines:
TR-1.
Trail designs should be interesting and attractive to the user. Trails may
follow stream and creek corridors, interesting scenery or areas of
outstanding beauty.
TR-2. Trail designs should be looped and interconnected to provide a variety of
trail lengths and destinations.
TR-3.
Trail designs should take into account soil conditions, steep slopes,
surface drainage and other physical limitations that could impact the area
from over-use.
TR-4. Bicycle trails should provide opportunities for the recreation rider as well
as the touring and commuter bicyclist.
TR-5. Bicycle routes and paths should minimize the conflicts between motorists
and bicyclists.
TR-6. Hiking trails should have a variety of lengths and grades for the casual
stroller as well as the serious hiker.
TR-7. Paved trails should be designed wide enough to accommodate park
maintenance vehicles.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Development Criteria & Design Guidelines Final Draft 2000 Section VI - 4
UNDEVELOPED/OPEN SPACE AREAS
Criteria and Guidelines:
0S-1. Proposed public accesses into undeveloped / open space areas can be
encouraged by trail systems.
OS-2. Improvements should be kept to a minimum with the emphasis placed on
maintaining the natural environment.
0S-3. Environmentally sensitive lands should be acquired and placed in this
category.
OS-4.
Prior to acquiring an open space site, a complete site analysis should be
made to determine if unique qualities and conditions exist that warrants
the open space designation.
0S-5. Open space areas should not be acquired just for the reason of defeating
a land development opposed by adjoining neighbors.
OS-6.The intent of these policies is to ensure that public open space areas are
maintained in its natural state.
OS-7.
Federal Way City Code lists four types of Open Space (Usable Open
Space, Conservation Open Space, Buffer Open Space and, Severely
Constrained Open Space). Please see Section 20-155 of the Federal
Way City Code for detailed descriptions of each of these types of Open
Space. This may include a fee-in-lieu.
All residential subdivisions are required to provide public open space
areas in the amount of 15 percent of the gross land area of the subdivision
(except for subdivisions created under Federal Way Municipal Code
Section 20-154), as per Section 20-155 (b).
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Development Criteria & Design Guidelines Final Draft 2000 Section VI - 5
NATURE TRAILS
(Insert Construction Detail)
UNPAVED HIKING/EQUESTRIAN TRAILS
(Insert Construction Detail)
MULTI-PURPOSE PAVED TRAILS
(Insert Construction Detail)
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Development Criteria & Design Guidelines Final Draft 2000 Section VI - 6
<Insert Photo>
SECTION VII
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Park Acquisition / Development / Renovation Criteria
SECTION VII
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Introduction
The Capital Improvement Plan provides the framework to address and prioritize
maintenance and protection of the city's infrastructure and to build new capacity
to meet the needs of our growing community. In 1999, the Federal Way City
Council approved a quantifiable criteria model to evaluate and prioritize park
capital improvement projects.
The Parks and Recreation Commission will annually review the park capital
improvement projects based on the comprehensive plan's goals and objectives.
The capital improvement projects will be scored according to the 10 criteria
factors (table xx). Projects will be ranked and prioritized into the City's 12 year
Capital Improvement Plan.
Capital Improvement Process
Funding of the Capital Improvement Projects are considered along with the
preparation and approval of the City's biennium budget process. The biennium
budget's first year begins on odd years; therefore, on the even years, Council will
identify goals and objectives for the operating and capital budgets.
The Parks and Recreation Commission will review staff's updates of the Parks
Capital Improvement Plan. The Commission presents the proposed capital
improvement plan at a public meeting for comments. After this public process,
the Parks Capital Improvement Plan is forwarded to City Council for funding
approval along with the proposed Biennium Budget.
Fiscal Policies for Capital Projects
General fund balances from prior years are earmarked by Council policy to be
used for funding capital projects. The Council reviews and prioritizes all city-wide
capital plans and approve allocation based on funds available annually (mid-year
biennium budget adjustment).
Park Capital Improvement Projects
Park projects include acquisition, new facility development, repair and
replacement of park facilities and equipment. Specific project descriptions are on
pages x to xx. Table x summarizes the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Departmenrs12-year Capital Improvement Plan.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Capital Improvement Plan Final Draft 2000 Section VII - 1
Park Acquisition / Development / Renovation Criteria
Funding Sources
The following are possible funding sources for park capital improvement projects.
Washington State
Interagency
Committee for
Outdoor
Recreation
Includes the following grant categories:
· Boating Facilities Program
· Firearms and Archery Range Recreation
Program
· National Recreational Trails Program
· Non-highway and Off-Road Vehicle Activities
Program
· Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program
· Youth Athletic Facilities Program
King County
Community
Development
Block Grant
The Federal Department of Housing and Urban
Development's (HUD) Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) program provides an
annual grant to entitled cities and counties (park
projects are eligible).
King County
Youth Sports
Field Grant
The King County YSFG program provides
matching grant funding to renovate, expand or
develop sports fields and facilities serving youth,
ages 21 and under in King County
General Fund
General
Obligation Bond
Councilmanic
Bonds
General funds allocated to the Parks,
Recreation and Cultural Services Department
A property tax for the sale of construction
bonds. The tax assessment can be levied up to
30 years. Requires a 60% majority approval of
40% of the voters who voted in the previous
general election.
Bonds issued by the City Council. This type of
bond does not require a vote of the people but
must be paid out of the City's annual operating
budget.
r~
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Park Impact Fees
City of Federal Way
Money allocated from the City's General Fund to
finance capital improvement projects.
Development fees. Fees imposed by the City
for park land acquisition and development. All
residential subdivisions shall be required to
provide open space for 15 percent of the gross
land area of the subdivision site; except for
subdivisons created under section 20-154 of the
FWCC.
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Capital Improvement Plan Final Draft 2000 Section VII - 2
Park Acquisition / Development / Renovation Criteria
Park Impact
Fees
Fee-in lieu payment may be made to satisfy
open space requirements at the discretion of the
parks director after consideration of the city's
overall park plan, quality, location and planning
area of the open space that would otherwise be
provided within the project. Any fees collected
shall be utilized within the park comprehensive
plan, planning area that the subject property
falls within, unless the applicant by voluntary
agreement directs the expenditures of such fees
in a different planning area. The Parks and
Recreation Planning Area Designation Map is
referenced in this section.
User fees may be imposed by the City to
recover a program's cost or to reduce the
department's cost of operating a program and/or
a facility, which also include capital
improvement projects.
A proposed list of measurable criteria to prioritize projects for inclusion in the
Parks Capital Improvement Plan is as follows:
Table 14
/ / Renovation Criteria
· 0 Points 1 Point 2 Points 3 Points
1 .Reepond~ t° ah": · No need or urgency · Suspected need with . Suspected need · Report or other
:'Urgent Need or i..,' no substantiation based upon visual documentation
OpportunRy, ' " inspection, public has been
Conforms to legal, comment prepared
Contractual. or . · Suspected threat of · Confirmed threat
Government Mandate development of development
· Fills important
gap in park
system
· Significant public
comment survey,
· ·· petition, public
hearing
· Legal, mandate contractual, gov't
2 Heal~ andSafe~,~ · No known issues · Suspected health or * Suspected need · Documented
iSs~s : safety issues based upon visual evidence of
· Provides public safety inspection or public unsanitary
benefit through comment condition, health
recreation · Visible deterioration and safety code
violations, injuries
3 Fiscal Values · Leveraging of fund · Leveraging of funds · Leveraging of at · Leveraging of
through somewhat likely through least ½ project more than 50% of
partnerships, grants, partnerships, grants, funding available from project costs from
bonds or volunteers bonds and volunteers other sources is likely other sources in
is unlikely hand
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Capital Improvement Plan Final Draft 2000 Section VII - 3
Park Acquisition / Development / Renovation Criteria
~ :"': .... , None 'LoW "~', ::: Moderate High
'i Criteria ·
· ' ". '" ' :" 0 Points 1 P~int .. '.~:....:'. · 2Points 3Points
" ' '".', :,.,.::' '~ ,' 'i"::: ~ ..... '
'. ~..~..
'COnforms to Parks · Not in any plar~ · Conceptual Stage · 'ldentifie~l ir~ Comp · Helps meet level
Comp Plan or Other. document Plan or Functional of service
'Adopted Plan ' ... Plan objectives
· FeasibilitY; Including · Project simply an · Some public · Conceptual or · Construction
Public Support and . idea involvement, letters, schematic level documents
· .Project Readiness'.. '.' · No public input workshops approval complete
· No other supporting · Professional reports · Property identified · Option or dght of
information · High public support first refusal, willing
· · ~ ' ~ '" · Completed appraisal seller
Impllcetion~ of · No impact · Temporary repair · Evidence of possible
Deferring Project . · No imminent threat measures available structural failure
of development without significant · Confirmed pdvate
liability or added future development sale
..' cost possible
· . ·: · Indications of possible · Program
development participation limited or
" · Program quality limited reduced
or reduced · Significant future
cost increase
Benefits to other New · No association with · Minimal benefits to · Moderate benefit · Significant
Capital Projects or an or impacts to other existing or other projects such as relieving benefit such as
.Existing Park I projects overuse at another providing added /
Facility I Service or facility restored capacity
Service Delivery · Corrects minor to an existing
problem at adjacent / facility
existing facility · Corrects major
problem at
adjoining facility
· Provides benefits
to local economy
and tax base
Number of City , No residents · Only one neighborhood · More than one · Project will serve
Residents Served served served neighborhood served a City-wide
" population
Maintsnance and · Requires · Resources/capacity · Has minimal or no · Substantial
Operations Impact substantial new available without impact on existing reduction in M&O
M&O, No current additional budget M&O resources
budgetary commitment · Resources already
commitment · Requires new allocated or planned
resources which are for project in budget
available or likely · M&O requirements
available in budget absorbed with existing
resources
Geographic · Duplicates · Adequate number of · Parks nearby, no · Under served
Distribution services, significant parks are nearby, level of service area. No facilities
number of resources minimal level of service ovedap and gaps in within service area
available in area, ovedap service identified
level of service
~ ovedap
The following section is the Parks and Recreation Planning Area Designation
Map and prioritized Parks Capital Improvement Plan.
City of Federal Way Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Capital Improvement Plan Final Draft 2000 Section VII - 4
Subarea
Trails
Parks
Open Space
Dumas Bay Centre
Klahanee Lake Community/Senior Centre
Steel Lake Maintenance Bldg
City Owned Parcels
Lakes (All)
City of Federal Way
Annexation Area
Cities- Neighboring
Puget Sound
Parks Planning Area Designation
Map Printed-Feb 9 2000
Federal Way
CityMap
2000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 Feet
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Section VII-5
Note: This map is intended for use as a graphical representation only.
Map made by -jtj The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy.
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Park-, and Recreation
I;~ Name:
CELEBRATION PARK - Capital Improvements
Praiser NunWer: Project Ace, ount:
1. To ~ a mai~te~ance storage bu~ling at Celebration perk to safely and sacurely
house peri< mai~tononce equipment needed at the park.
2. A~ditl~ Ptsy Structures
The ~ ~ is located in the Pad~ and R~.readon Pblnnlng Am~ - F
amJl~t JuaWlaaflen:
Currently. PRCS is renting storage space fo~ all Celebration Park equipmeflt.
Park Commission Request
adet' C~un~ll Ravllv/IAplm'evsl:
ClP Funds - Exl~nlea L-T.D 1999 2000 200t 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prol~ AcQuisition $
Consu#ant Sewices $
Co~atmctidfl S S 80 S 80
Insuection S
ECluiomeflt Ax:clu~eltidfl S
ContinfloncY, e$
L. T-D refers to Life-to-Date, or to~al work comp~eto on the project before the current i~dget yea~
R~quimd Resources ($1,000'a)
tiP Funds - Relourcea L-T-D 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 200~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Pridr Year Fundin~ S
Unallocatod Fund Balance S
Real Estate Excise Tax S
Fuel Tax - pgth/Trail
GO Bond $
General Ful~l $ $ 80 $ 80
Grants/Contributions Received $
Mitigation Funds Received $
Grant,/Contributions Antlcioeted $
Mitigation Funda.Antiel0eted
Unfunded Needs
I Impact on O~nfl Funds L-T-D 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2001 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total I
Revenue Im:mase/{Decrease) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I s - I
Expondi ure r~ease/(Decrease
Pro~let Time L/ne
Prolect Schedule Budget Year - 1999 Budget Year - 2000 Budget Year - 2001
Item Jan - Mar [ Apr - Jun r Jul - sap I oct - Dec Jan - Mar I .N3r - Jun I Jul - Sap I Oct - Dec Jan - Mar I A~r. Jun I Ju~ - Sag I Oct - De(
proiect Feasibility StodV
Preliminary Deel~n ~
Envkonmontal Review
Final Design ~1
Progeny Alc~uisition
Bid S~-.~ncatl~a Preo, ~
Bid & Award Contract
Proiect Construction
Other (e.g. Equipmem Acquisition}
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
Project Name:
LAKOTA PARK REDEVELOPMENT
Project Number: Project Account:
303-7100-~-594-76
project D~ocrtptlo~:
Redevelop Lakota Park and a por0on of Lakota Jr High Property to accommodate
siting a football field, four betting fields and two soccer fields. Project also Includes
improved beltdng, upi]lading fields with underdralnage, field lights,
play areas and restrooms.
The Drooo~ed orotect is located tn the Parks and Recreation Planning Axla. A
Project Justification:
- 1997 City and School District jointly completed a master plan to address
athletic and ben~ facility needs at Lakota Park and Lakota Jr. High.
Council Review/Approval:
Projected Ex;endlturea ($1,000'a)
,ClP Funds - Expenses L-T.O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prol)ert~ Acquisition $ -
Consultant Sendc. es $ 54 $ 54
Construction $ 7,729 $ 7.729
Inspection $
Ecluioment AcQuisition $
ContinAenctes $ -
rotal ClPE. x~ensee i~ ' ~ ~ - ~ ~ 54 ~; 7,729 ~ - ~ ~ · ~; -~; ~ - ~ - $ - $ $ 7f763
L-T-D mfera to Lifa-to-Date, or total work complete on the project before the current budget year.
Required Resources ($I,000's)
,~lP Funds. Resources L-T.O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prior Year Funding $
Unallocated Fund Balance $
Real Estate Excise Tax $
Fuel Tax. Path/Troll $
GO Bond
General Fund $
Giants/Contributions Received $
Mitigation Funds Received $ -
Glants/Conthbufiens Anticipated $ 101 $ 101
Ml~gation Funds-Anticloatad $
un ded..* I
7t728 ~ ' ~ ' ~ ' ' ~ ' T - ~ - ~ - $ 7,783
rotal cm Resources
Project Time Line
Pro~ect Schedule Budget Year - 2000 Budget Year - 2001 Budget Year - 2002
Item Jan- MarA r-JunJul- Se Oct- DecJan- Mar~ Apr- Junl Ju~ Jan-Mar A r- Jun Jul- se oct- Dec
Project easilY~lity tud¥
Pmllmina~ Deaign
Environmental Review ~1
Final Design
ProDertv ACCluisi6on
Bid S;~::ifications Prep.
Bid & Award Contract
Project Construction
Other (e.g. Equipment AcquisitionI
City of Federal Way Co~ve Perks, RcearSon end O~en Space Plan Section VII - 8
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
Project N~me:
BPA TRAIL PHASE III
Project Number: Project Account:
303-7100-119-*
Project Des~rlpti~:
Construct Phaee III of BPA Troll from Campus Drive to SW 3561h,
The Dro~x)ead protect is located In the PaSS and Recreation Planning Area - C
Project Justification:
- Phase Ill design and cost estimate completed Iff 1998.
- Final link to complete trail conldor from SW 3561h to 13th Ave. S
;'rlo~' C~unctl RevlewlApproval:
iI iI
0 1,2 I KIIOmM~'
~?IMIL
Projected Expenditures ($1,000'a)
Funds - F. xpermea L.T.O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prooerh' Ac0ulsition $ -
Consultant Services $ 71 $ 54 $ 352 $ 477
Construction $ 1.077 $ 1.077
Insl~tlon $
EQuipment AcQuisition I $
C°nOnRenctesI $ -
rotal ClPExpeneas ~ 711~ 64 ~ ~ 352 q; lf077~ ~ ~; ' ~; -, ,IF ~ - q; -,~ $ ~ - S 1,554
L-T-D mfe~ to LEe-to-Date, or total wonk complete on the I~oject before the current budget year.
Required Resources ($f,O00'a)
ClP Funds - Reeourcea L-T-O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prior Year Fundinfl $ 58 $ 58
Unallocated Fund Balance $ -
Real Estate Excise Tax $ 45 $ 45
Fuel Tax - Path/Trail $ 11 $ 9 $ 20
GO Bond $
General Fund $ -
Granta/Con~butions Received $ 52 $ 54 $ 106
Mitigation Funds Received $ 23 $ 23
Grants/Contributions Anticipated $ 352 $ 365 $ 717
Mltlgatio~ Funds-Anticipated $ 73 $ 73
Unfunded Neads I I585 I S 585
TotalCIPReaources ~ 144 ~ 54 q; ~ 352 1,077'~ 'lq; ' ~ q; -'q; -~ q; ·q; o ~ - ~; -~ 1,627
IlmpactonOPeratin°Funde I L-T-O I 1999 I 2000 I 2001 I 2002 I 2003 I 2004 I 2005 I 2006 I 2007 I 2006 I 2009 I 2010 I 2011 I 20t2 I Total I
Revenue Incmaea/(Decmaea) $ .
INet Impact lq; 'lq; 'lq; 'lq; 5Jq; 5Iq; 5]q~ 5[~ 51~ 5J~ 51~ 5J~ 51~ 61~ 51~ 5 ~ 60I
P~ Wine
Project Schedule Budget Yeer- 1~0 Budget Year - 2000 Budget Year - 2001
Item Jan-Marl APr- Junl Jul-SaD I Oct* Dec Jan -Mar r- JunJul- Se Oct- DecJan -MarA r- JunJul*Se Oct- Dec
roiect easibllity tud¥
Preliminary Des~n
Environmental Review
Property Aceuisition
Bid SDeclflcations Prep.
Bid & Award Contract
Prolect Construction
Other (e.g. Equipment Acqulsi#on)
Ctty o~ F-edemt Way ~sive P~'ks, Recrea#~ a~d Open SI=ace Ple~ Ssctio, vii - g
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
Project Name:
SPORTS FIELD - Sacajawea Soccer Field Improvement
Project Number: Project Account:
303-7100-~-594-76
Froject Oeacrlptton:
Renovate existing soocer/football ~ld at ~w~ ~. Re~ e~ng tu~
and ~ ~ a~l ~ p~u~.
~e ~m~ ~ · ~ in ~e Pa~ and Recma~ Planning ~a - E
Project Justification:
Project proposed wfil Increase practices and game play. Exisfing field c~osed annually 8
mo~ths due to unpiayable to conditions. Meets councils goal to provide sports fields.
Prior Council Review/Approval:
Saca
Projected Expenditures ($1,000's)
CIP Funds - Expenses L-TD t999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2006 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Property Ac~uisition $
Consultant Set.cas $ '
Construction $ 565 $ 21 $ 27t $ 23 $ 287 $ 24 $ 305 $ 25 $ 323 $ 1.844
thsDecfion
EQUiDment Ac~uisition ! $
Confin~encies!~ -
TotalClPExpenaee $ - ~ 565 ~ ~ - ~; 21 ~i 271 ~ ~ 23 ~; 287;~ ~ 24=~ 305 $ - $ 25 $ 323!$ lr844
L- T-D mfe= to Life-to-Date, or total work complete on the project before the current budget year.
Required Resources ($1,000's)
CIP Funds - Reaourcae L-TI) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prlor Year Fundinn $
Unallocated Fund Balance $ -
Real Estate Exclea Tax $ 23 $ 40 $ 24 $ 111 $ 25 $ 109 $ 331
Fuel Tax - Path/Trail $ 10 $ 10 $ 20
GO Bond I $
Goneral Fund
Grants/Cootribufions Received
Mifi~afion Funds Received i $ -
Grants/ContribufionsAnficil)ated $ 565, $ 271 $ 238 ! $ 184 i $ 1,257
Mlti~afion Funds-AnticiOated -
Unfunded Needs $ 21 21
TotalClPRe$ourcaa $ - ~ 565 ~ · ~ -~ 21 ~; 271 ~ ~i 23 ~ 287 ~ ~i 24 305 $ - $ 25 ~ 109 lr629
IImp actonOperaUngFunde I L'TI) I 198g I 2000 I 2001 I 2002 ] 2003 I 2004 I 2005 I 2009 I 2007 I 200fi I 2009 I 2010 I 2011 I 2012 I Total I
Revenue Increase/(Decrease) I I I I I I I [ I I I I I I I I $ ' I
Expenditure Increase/(Decmase} $ -
Project Time Line
Pro~ect Schedule Budget Year - 1999 Budget Year - 2000 Budget Year - 2001
Item Jan-aar~IJan-Mar Ar-Jun Jul-Se Oct-Dec Jan-Mar r-Jun Jul-~e Oct-Dec
rolect Feasibility tudy
Proliminarv Deskln
Environmental Review
Final Design ~
Prooert~ Acxlulsifion
Bid SPecifications Prep. ~
Bid & Award Contract
Project Co~strucfion
Other le.~. Equipment Acquisition)
City of Federal Way Co~sive Pe/~& Recreation end Open Space Plan Secgol VII - 10
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
Project Nlml:
SKATE PARK
project Number: Project Account:
303-7100-t 24-594-76
Project Description:
ConsthJCt a 'skate park' facility at Steel Lake Park.
- Ivlaafar plan approved in 1997.
- Constmc~on docume~fa completed in 1999.
The ixoPosed lxolect Is located in the Parkl and Recreation Planning Area - G
Project Justification:
Facility will provide recreation opportunity for youth and adults in skateboard and
rollerblade acavtOea.
Council Review/Approval:
Projected Expenditures ($1,000's)
~IP Funds - Expenses L-T,O t999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prooerh' Acquisition $ -
Consultant Sen~cea S 25 $ 25
Construction $ 225 $ 225
Inspection $
E0uipment AcQuisition $
Contingenctea $
rotal CIPExpeneas ~ -, ~; - ~ 250
L-T-D refers to Life-to-DaW, or total work ~ompfefe on the pro. ct befem the current budget year.
Required Resources ($1,000'a)
~IP Funds - Resources L.T-O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2000 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Pdor Year Fundinl3 $
Unallocated Fund Balance S
Real Estate Excise Tax S
Fuel Tax - Path/Trail $
GO Bond $
General Fund $ 250 $ 250
Grants/Contributions Received $
MIti0aflon Funds Received $
Granla/Con~butions Anticipated $
Mi6~ation Funds-Anfctpated $
Unfunded Needs I I - $
Ilmpact on OparaUng Fundl L-T4) 1999 2000 I 2001 { 2002 I 2003 I 2004 I 2000 I 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
I Revenue Incmaea/(Deorea~) I I ) I I I I I I I ; I I I a I $
Expenditure Increase(Decrease) 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 7 69
Project T/me L/rra
=ro~ect Schedule Budget Year - 1909 BuCl~et Year - 2000 Bugl~et Year - 2001
Item Jan-MarlA~r-JunIJul-SeolOct-Dec Jan-Mar r-Jun Jul-Se Oct-Dec Jan-Mar -Jun Jul-Se Oct-Dec
roJect easibility tudy
PratlmlnarV Desk3n
Environmental Review m
Final Desk3n .
Propan%, AcQuisition
Bid S~c~flcation$ Prep. ~
Bid & Award Contract
ProWct Construction
Other (e.g. Equipment Acquisition I
C~ of Federal W~y C~ l~n~a, Rect~etk~ end Open St~ce Pl~ Sectk~ Vll - f l
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
DEFERRED MAINTENANCE FOR PARK FACILITIES
~roJect Numl~r: Project Account:
303- 7100-xxx
Pmje~ Deardtption:
Project Juatiflcatlon:
Them em no funding ~omces ider~fled i~ the currant budge~ to rnee~ these maintenance ncods.
Prior Council Revlew/Approvah
ClP Funde - Expeneae L-T-O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 200~ 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Pml~nv Ac~uisiti0n $
Comultant Set, cee S
Comb-uc~x~ S
I.SDeCtt0n $
Euui~men~ Ac~uts~on S
L-T-D refers to ~Date, or t~tal work compiete on b~e project before h'm current Ix~get year.
Required Resources ($1,000'e)
CIP Fun(ti - Re~ource~ L-T-D 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 200~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prior Year F uflcli~lg $
Uncilonaled Fund BaJance S
Real Estate Excise Tax $
Fuel Tax - path/Traii
GO Bom $
General Fund
Grams/ConUtbutions Received $
M~aUon Funds Reco~ved $
Gran~/Cormitx~flons Antici0ated
Mit~aUon Funds-AnliciDaWd $ -
Unfunded Needs s0
Project Time Line
Project Schedule Bud~t Year · 1~9 Budget Year · 206~ Bud~M Year - 2001
Item Jan - Mar I A~ - J~ I Jul - 5ep I ~ ' D~ Jan - Mar I Apr- Jun I Jul - S~ ~ ~ - ~ Jan - Mar I A~- J~ I Jul - Se~ ~ ~ - D~
F~
Pm~ ~u~n
B~ S~m P~.
B~ & Aw~ ~
OmG~m
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
Project Name:
WEDGEVVOOD PARK
Project Number: Project Account:
303-7100-~-594-76
Project Deecflptfon:
Complete master lY, an for a nelghbomood park, Jflciuding play equipment
and o~er site Improvements.
The ~ pro)act is located in tho Perks and Recreation Planning Area * B
Project Justification:
- Meets comprehensive plan goal for neighborhood parks.
- In 1998 Council funded $10,000 far phase I improvements.
- Community volunteering to develop and maintain park.
Pflor Council RovJawlApprovah
Projected E. xpendlturos ($1,000's)
CIP Fund/- Expenses L.T-O 1909 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Properh, Ac~lutsltlon $
Consultant Services $
Constmctton $ 50 $ 50
Insl)ectlon
Ecluloment Acquisition , $
$
Totel CtPExpeneee T T 50 T ' T ' T T ' T ' T ' T ~; ' T * T $ ' $ ' T ' $ 50
L. T-D refers to Life-to-Date, or total won~ compieM on the project defom the current budget year.
Required Resources ($1,000's)
CIP Funds - Ro$ourca$ L.T.O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prior Year Fondlfl~ $
Unailonatod Fund Balance $
Reel Estate Excise Tax $
Fuel Tax - Path/Trail S
GO Bond $
Genontl Fund $ 50 $ 50
Grants/ConMbutJons Received $
MIt~ation Funds Received $
Grant~Contributtons Anticipated $
MIt~atlon Funds-Anticipated $
Unfunded Needs I
Impact on Operating Funds L-T.O 1990 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Revenue Incmaee/(Decreeee) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I $
Expenditure Incmene/(Deoreese) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $ 2 26
INa"mpc.I' 'iT -il 2il 21, 211 211 211 2[1 2il .ti 2l, 2r, 2r, 2[, 2[I 201
Project 77me Line
Pro}act Schedule Budl~let Year - 1090 Budget Year - 2000 ISud~ot Year - 2001
Item Jan - MarI Apr - Jun ] Jul -Sep [ Oct - Dec Jan - MarI Apr - Jun J Jul -sep I Oct - Dec Jan - MarI Apr - Jun [ Jul -Sep I oct - Dec
Proiect Feasibility Study
Preliminary Desitin 1
Environmental Review
Final Deeign
ProDen%' ACcluisltlon
Bid Specifications PreD.
Bid & Award Conb'act
Prelect Const~ucUon ~
Other Ce.o. E¢~uipment Acqulsltion1
City of Federal Wey Co~ve Pe~s, Recteetion end Open Spece Pl~n S~ vie- 13
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
;~roject Name:
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK RENOVATION
=roJect Nun~er: Project Account:
303-7100----594-76
=roject Description:
- Renovation/repair of site deficiencies to address safety and/or to add amenities.
la., picnic tables, benches, signage. ADA requests and pathway mpaim.
Project Justification:
- 8 of 13 neighborhood pads were built in esrty 1970's. Much of the original
co~stmctlen has evidence of extreme wear and fatigue, and/or site improvements
to meet cun'ent recreation needs,
Pdor Council Review/Approval:
1
Projected Expenditures ($I,000°s)
:CIP Funds · Expenses L.T-D 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prol~er~ AcQuisi0on $ -
Consultant Sen. ices $ 20 $ 21 $ 21 $ 22 $ 22 $ 23 $ 23 $ 23 i $ 24 $ 24 $ 25 $ 248
Constmc0on $
Inspection $
E~3ulament AcQuisition $
Conltnflencies $ -
rotal ClPExpenees ~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ T 20 T 21 T 21 ~; 22 T 22 ~ 23 ~ 23 T 23:T 24 T 24 T 25 T 248
L-T-D refers to Life-to-Date, or total work complete on the project before the current budget year.
Required Resources ($1,000's)
~IP Funds - Resources L-T-O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prior Year FundicQ $
Unallocated Fund Balance $
ReslEststeExciseTax $ 21 ! $ 21 $ 19 $ 23 $ 23 $ 24 $ 24 $ 155
Fuel Tax - Path/Trail $ 3 $ 11 $ 13
GO Bond $
General Fund $
Grantdcontrlbutions Received $
Mit~atien Funds Received $ -
GrantdCo~trtbutiens Anticipated $ 22 $ 23 $ 14 $ 60
Miti0ation Funds-Anticipated $ '
Unfunded Needs $ 20 $ 20
TofalClPReeourcas T ' ~ ' ~ 'i T~; 20 T 21 T 21 ~; 22 ~ 22 ~; 23 ~ 23 ~; 23 T 24 $ 24 T 25 T 249
Ilmpect on Operating Funds L-T-O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total I
Revenue Increase(Decrease) _$ '
I
Expenditum Inc, e;_ _~(Decrease}
$
Net Impact I~ 'IT -I~ '1~ -IT 'IT '1~ '1~ 'IT -I~ 'l~ -l~ -I~ -IS -IS -IS :1
Project Time Une
Project Schedule Bud~llt Year -lm Budget Year - 2000 Budget Year - 2001
Item Jan - MarI Apr - Jun I Jul - sep I oct - Dec Jan - MarI Apr - Jun I Jul - Sep I oct - Dec Jan - MarI Apr - Jun I Jul - sep I oct - Dec
Pmiect Feasibility Study
Preliminan/Desiiln
Envlmnmonfal Review
Final Design
Pr0pen'y Acquisition
Bid Specittcatiens Prop.
Bid & Award Contract
Prelect Construction
Other {e.fl. Equipment Acquisition}
C, fiy of Feder~ Wey Comprehensive F~rks, Recma#on ~d Open Space Pien Section VII - 14
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
~'roject Name:
STEEL LAKE PARK
;~roject Number: Project Account:
303-7100-~-594-76
Project Description:
Site Master Plan
(Steel Lake and Steel Lake Annex)
T~e oro0oesd oro~ect is located in the Parks and Recma#on Planning Area - G
Project Justification:
Evaluation and planning of the site's multiple uses for Improved paddng,
t~ffic flow, site lines, ADA accessibility, sbectai event support and other
Prior Council Review/Approval:
ClP Funds - Expenses L*T-O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2000 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Property Acquisition $
Consultant Sen'ices $ 20 $ 260 $ 281
ConsthJCtlOn $
Inspection $
Eauipment AcaulslOon $
Con0naenctes I 281'
L-T-D mfms to Life-to-Data, or total work complete on the pmjec~ before the currant budget year.
Rlqulr~d ResourCes ($1,000's)
CIP Funds - Resources L-T.O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prior Year Funding $
Unallocated Fund Balance $
Real Estate Excise Tax $
Fuel Tax. path/Trail $
GO Bond $
General Fund $ 20 $ 20
Granta/Contribu0ons Received $
Mitigation Funds Received $
Grants/Contributions Antlcteated $
Mitigation Funds-An0cl0ated $
Un~nded Needs I 260 $ 26(~
TofalCIPRaaource$ ~ 'IIi '~ 20 2001~ - ~ - ~ ~ - ~ - Ii ~ - Ii -~ - ~ · Ii ~ 28t
ProJegt Time Line
Project Schedule Budget Year - 1999 Budget Year · 2000 Bucl~et Year - 2001
Item Jan o MarI Apr - Jun I Jul - Sap I Oct - DeC Jan - MarI Apr- Jun I Jul - sap I oct - Dec Jan - MarI Apr - Jun I Jul - sap I oct - Dec
Project Feasibility Study
Preliminary Design ~
Environmental Ravfew
Final Des~n
Proberh' Acquisition
Bid Srmclflcations Prep.
Bid & Award Contract
Protact Construction
Other le.~. Equipment Acquisltionl
C~ of Federal Way Compreheneive Pe~& Reo'eation and Open S~ace Plen Sectk~ VIl .15
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
Project Name:
THOMPSON OPEN SPACE
Project Number: Project Account:
303-7 lOO-~-594-76
Project Description:
- Neighbomood pad( redevelopment.
The Dropesed proiect is located in the Parks and Recreation Planning Area - H
Project Justification:
- Purchased in 1998 to address planning areas deficiency in park land.
- Project identified in Parks Comprehensive Plan
Prior' Council Revlew/Approval:
Projected Expenditures ($'l,O00's)
~;IP Funds. Expon$ea L-TO 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prooerw Acquisition $ .
C(msutiant Services $ 20 $ 20
Construction $ 104 $ 104
InsPection $
Equipment Acquisition $
C°nflnt:lencies II $
12~
rotal ClPExpensea T T ' T ' T 20 ~ 104 ~ ' T ' T ~ ' T ' ~ ' ~ 'IT ' T ' T T
L-T-D mf~rs to Life-to-Date, or total work complete on the projec~ before the current budget year.
Required Resources ($1,000'a)
~!P Funda - Resources L-T-D 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prior Year Fundin(3
Unallocet~d Fund Balance $
Real Estate Excise Tax $
Fuel Tax. pativTrail $
GO Bond $ .
General Fund $ 20 $ 20
Grant,Contributions Received $
Mitigation Funds Received $
Grants/Conthbutions Anticloated $
Mit~ation Funds-Antictpeted $ .
Unfunded Needs I Iq04 I104
rotal CIPReaourcea T T ' ~; -~; 20 104 ~; ' !~; '~ T ' ~ "~; ~ ' $ ' ~; T 124
Impact on Operating Funds L.T-O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 200ti 2007 2008 2009 2010 201t 2012 Total I
Revenue Increase/(Decreaea) I I I I I I ] I I I I I I I I I $ - I
,, Expenditure Incmaea/(Decrease) I I I I I * 5 I ~ S t T 5 I T S I ~ 6 ] T S ] T S I ~ S I ~ S I $ S I T S I T ~2 I
Net Impact I~ '1~ 'IT 'IT '1~ sJ~ Sl~ 51~ 51~ 81~ 8i~ 8t~ 6l$ 6[~ sit sit 82I
Project T/me Line
Budget Year - 2000 Budget Year - 2001
Project Schedule Budget Year - 1999 Apr- Jun I Jul - sep oct - Dec Jan - Mar] Apr - Jun I Jul - $ep I oct - Dec
Item Jan - MarI Apr - Jun I Jul - Sep I OCt - Dec Jan - MarI
Project Feasibilitv Study
I
/
Pmliminanf Design
Environmental Rewew
Final Desk3n
Property Ac~uisition
Bid Specifications Prep.
Bid & Aw'an] Contract
Prolect Construction
Other (e.g. Equipment Acquisition)
City of FederM Way C~ Pen~s, Rec~eation ~rld Open Space Plen Section Vii- 16
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
Project Name:
SPRING VALLEY OPEN SPACE
Project Number: Project Account:
303-71
;'to, ct Dusc~lption:
Master Plan and develol~ Dm0erty into ooen s!~ace Dad(.
1~e I)ro0oead Dr01ect is located in the Parks and Recreation Planning Ama - D
Project Justification:
Purchased property in 1992 from the 1989 O~en Space Program.
=dor Council RevlawlApproval:
:IP Funds - Expanses L-T-O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2000 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prct~W Ac~ulsi0on I $ -
Consultant Services] $ 20 $ 20
Constmction $ 104 $ 104
Ifls0ection $
EauiDment Ac~uisltio~
C°n0nt~onctes . '
rotal CIPExpenlel ; -; ~ ~ - ~ 2ol~ 104 ; ; - ~ -I~i . ~ - ~i ~ ~ ~; - ~ . 124
L-T-D re[ers to Life-to-Date, or total wo~ ~ompleto on the project before the currant budget year.
Required Resources ($1,000's)
~IP Funds.Resources L-T.O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012Il sTOtal.
Prtor Year Fundin;;
Unalloceted Fund Balance $
Real Estate Excise Tax I $
Fuel Tax - Path/Trail ~ $
GO Bond $
Geaeral Fund ! $
G~ant~Contrlbutions Received $
Mitigation Funds Received $
Grant~Contdbutio~s Anticll~ated $ 5 $ 5
Mitigation Funds-AntJcll~ated I $ '
Unfunded Needs 1151104I I119
Project Time Line
Budget Year - 2000
=ro~ect Schedule Budget Year · 1999 Budget Year - 2001
item Jan - MarI Apr. Jun I Jul - sap I OCt - Dec Jan - MarI Apr- Jun r Jul - sap r oct - Dec Jan - MarI Apr - Jun I Jul - Sap I OCt - Dec
Pl~ect F~_n~lbilitv S~dy
I
En~men~l Re~
Fi~l ~n
Pm~ A~uisition
Bid S~ons ProD.
Bid & A~ ~n~
P~ ~nstmction
Other (e.g. Equipment A~uis~on)
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
~roj~ct Neml:
POVERTY BAY PARK
=reject Number: Project Account:
303-7100-~-594-75
Project Description:
Master Ptan park
The proposed Drolect is located in the Per~ and R~cr~tflo~ Planning Ama -A
Project Justification:
48 acm perk on puget sound. Site is forested and contains steep slopes.
Planning for accessible trolls and erosion control needed.
Prior Council Review/Approval:
Projected Expenditures ($f,O00's)
¢IP Funds - Expenses L-T-O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
ProDen'v Ac~uisition $ -
Consultant Services $ 20$ 78 $ ~8
Construction $
InsPection $
Equipment A~uisltion $
C°ntin~lencieaI $ '
Total CIPExpensea ~ - ~ . ~ 20 ~ 781~F ' ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~F ~F ' ~F ' ~ ~F ' ~F ', $ - $ 98
L-TO ref~ra to Life-to-Date, or total work complete on the project before the current budget year.
Required Resources ($1,000's)
CIP Funds - Resources L-T-O 1999 2000 200t 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prior Year Funding3 $
Unallocated Fund Balonce $
Real Estate Excise Tax $
Fuel Tax - Path/Trail $
GO Bond $
General Fund $
Grants/Cont~bufleas Received $
Mit~ation Funds Received $
Grants/Contributions Anticipated $
_
Mi~ation Funds-Anticipated $ 20 $ 72 $ 92
Unfunded Needs $ 6$ 6
Total CIPRelources ~ - ~ - ~ 20~ 7tii~ ' ~F ~ ' ~ ' ~F ~ ' ~ ' :~F ~F ' ~ ' ~F · $ 96
I lmpact on Operating Funds L-T.O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Revenue Increase/(Decraase) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I $ - I
Expenditure Increaea/(Decrease) -
Project Time Une
Budget Year - 2000
Project Schedule Budget Year - 1999
I
Year - 2001
Item
Jan-
Jun
Jan-
Jun
Jun Jul - sap oct- Dec
MarI Apr-I Jul-sep [oct-Dec MarI Apr-I Jul-sepIlOct' Dec,Jan' Marll ABr'rd'~et
/
Proiect Feasibility Study
Preliminarv Des~r,
Environmental Review
Final Desitin
Property Acquisition
Bid SPecifications Prep.
Bid & Award Contract
Project Construction
Other (e.g. Equipment Acquisition)
City el Federal Way Compmhen~ve Park& Recreation end Open Space Plan Sec#on VII - f 8
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
pro~d I~me:
PANTHER LAKE
Pro~ Number: Project Account:
To revise the panthar L,Mce MMtar Plan.
The Ixolx~ed prelect is Iocatad in the Parks and RecmaUon Planning Ama. B
~roJsct JimUIIca~on:
Develop site as indicatad in the comprehensive plan and to link to the BPA Trail System.
=riot Coundl RevMwlApprovsl:
.~lP Funds - Expengel L-T-D 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 200~ 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
ProDen*v A(:qu~Won $ .
Comu#an~ Sen~ces
$
Cor~;'uction S 300 I $ 300
InsPection i $
Eautpment AcQuisition ' $
L~T.D refer~ t~ uM-t~D~e~ ~ Z~M~ w~rk c~mp~ete ~n the pr~jec~ ~ef~re ~)e cu~ent ~u~et ~
.~lP Fund~ - R~ur{~ L.T-D 1999 20(~ 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2(~ 2009 20t0 2011 2012 Total
F~ior Year Fundln~ i $
Un,located Funcl Balance
Real Estate Exc;~ea T~x $
Fuel Tax. pMtVTra#
GO Bond $
Genre'al Fund
GrmY~CormllxJ(Jons Received $
MIt~mJon Funds Rece~ld
Gmr~Coctwx~ion~ A~ $ 150 $ 150
Mi~JGMion F unds-Arfd(Y~ted $ -
Unft~de¢J Needs ~ 150 ~ 150
Total CIPRe~ourcsl ; ' ~ ° I~ · ~ . ~ ~oo ~ '1~ ' ; ' ~ ' ~ ' I~ "~ · ~ . ; - 300
Project T/me L/ne
PrOject Wule Budget Y#r - 1~9 Budget Year - 2000 Budget Year - 2001
Item ,Jan - Mar I Ap~- ,Jun I ,Jul - sep I oct * Dec,Jan- Marl AD~- ,Jun I ,Jul- Sep Oct - ~ec ,Jan- MarI Asr- ,Jun I ,Jul- ~ I oct - [:mc
I
/
;*,,~,,~,,~r~ Design
Envlmnrnen~l Review
FInM Design
Pmpeny AcquJsldon
Bid SDedfl(:a~dons PreD.
Bid & Awed Co~tr~:t
Pmiec{ ConstnJc~on
Other (e.g. Equipment ACClUisitionI
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
Project Name:
PARK ACQUISITION
Project Number: Project Account:
303-7100-~-594-76
;~roject Description:
To purchase mai prop~ fo; active and passive recreation needs.
:~roject Justification:
City adopted Parks. Recreation and Comprehensive goal is to provide 10.9
aaes of park land per 1.000 population.
;Prior Council R~viawlApproval:
0 1,2 1 I(JlomeW
~OU:~D
Projected Expenditures ($1,000's)
CIP Funds -Expenses L-T-D 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Pnx)ertVAceuisition $ 100 $ 102 $ 104 $ 106 $ 108 $ 110 $ 113 $ 115 $ 117 $ 120 $ 122 $ 124 $ 1,341
Consultant Senecas $
ConstnJction $
I nsl~-'tion $
ECluiDment Ac~luislflon
i Contingencies$ -
Total ClP Expenses 1; .11; 1; ·1; 100 1; 102 $ 104 $ 106 1; 108 1; 110 1; 113 1; 115 1; 117 $ 120 $ 122 $ 124 $ 1;341
L-T-D telers to Life-to-Date, or total wo~ complete on the projec~ do[on~ the current buo~get year.
Requlrcd Resources ($1,000's)
CIP Funds - Resources L-T-O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2000 2007 2008 2009 2010 20tl 2012 Total
Prior Year Fundin~ $
Unallocated Fund Balance $ 12 $ 12
Real Estate Excise Tax $ 22 $ 14 $ 67 $ 87 $ 61 $ 251
FueITax- Path/Trail $ 10$ 7 $ 10$ 10 $ 10$ 10 $ 58
GO Bond $
Geneml Fund
Grants/Contributions ReCeived $
Mitigation Funds Received 74 I $
G~ants/ContrlbutionsAntiCtpated $ $ 101 $ 110 $ 88 $ 38 $ 117 $ 23 $ 50 $ 124 $ 72.
Mitt~ation Funds-Anticipated $ 75 $ 75
un .ded..ds I '=I 1°21 29
219
rotalClPRaaource$ 1;- 1; 1; . 102 104 1; 10till; 100 $ 110 I; 11311; 115 1; 117 ~ 1201~ 122 $ 124 . lr341
Project Time Une
Project Schedule Budget Year - 1999 Budget Year - 2000 Budget Year - 2001
Item Jan - Marl Apr- Jun l Jul-$epIOct-Dec Jan - Marl Apr- Jun l Jul-SepIOct-Dec Jan - Marl Apr- Jun l Jul-$epIOct-Dec
Proiect Feasibilih, Study
I /I
Preliminary Design
Environmental Review
Final Design
Property Ac(~uisition
Bid Si)ectflcations Pmo.
Bid & Award contact
Prolect Construction
Other {e g.. I::q,,inment Acquisition)·
C,~/ of Federal Wey ~ P~.ks, Recmetion a~d Ope~ Spece P~en Section VII - 20
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
Project Name:
FRENCH LAKE PARK
Project Numi~r: Project A~¢ount:
303-7100----594-76
)rojeGt DeeorlpOon:
- Master plan and construct park improvements.
The orooeaed prelect is located in the Parks and Recreation Planning Area -A
Project Justification:
- Properly acquired in 1990 to address the need for neighbo~ood/communlty parks.
Prlo~ Council Review/Approvah
Projected Expenditures ($1,000'$)
CIP Funds - Expenses L-T-D 1900 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
PrODertv Acgulal0on $ -
Consultant Services $ 20$ 20
Constmcflon $ 212 $ 212
Inspection $
Eauioment ACduisltion 20 I I~
Continl~enclas -
rotalCIPExpeneea ~i ' I~ ~ - ~ ~ 212 ~ - ~ - ~ - ~ ~i ~ - ~ $ ~ - ~ - 233
L.T-D raters to Lite-to-Date, or total won~ complete on the project before the cun~nt budget year.
Required Resources ($1,000'e)
:lP Funde - Resources L-T.O 1999 2000 200t 2002 2003 2004 2000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prior Year Funding $ -
Unallocated Fund Balance $ 20 $ 20
Real Estate Excise Tax J$
Fuel Tax - Path/Trail! $
GO Bond $
Geneml Fund $
Grant~Contrlbutions Received ! ~
M~k3aaon Funds Received
Gmnts/ContribuUons Anticieated $
Mit~ation Funds-Anticteated $
UnfundddNeeds I 212 '$ 212
rotalCIPResourcae ~ -I~i - ~ - ~ 20 212 ~ ~ - ~ - ~ - ~ - ~ · ~ - ~ ~ - ~ · $ 233
Project Time Line
I
Budget
Year
2000
Budget Year - 2001
Item Jan - MarI Apr- Jun I Jul - Sep J oct - Dec
Jan - MarI Apr- Jun I Jul - Sep J oct - Dec
Project Feasibilitv Study
Pmllmlnarv Design
Environmental Review
Final Design
ProDertv Acquisition
Bid Specifications PreD,
Bid & Award Contract
Prelect Construction
Other le.g. Equipment Acquisition1
City of Federal Way Com~ngve PMks, Recreation end ~ Slice Plan Secb~n VII - 2t
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
Project Name:
HISTORICAL CABINS PARK
Project Number: Project Account:
303-7100-~-594-76
Project Description:
Develop pe~ng, Interpretive signage, fi-ails linking Historical Cabins Park to
the Hytebos State park system.
The I~)lx)sed 0rolect is located ~ the Parks and Recreation Planning Area - F
Project Justification:
Partnership between the City of Federal Way, State Parks, Friends of the
Hytabos and the HtstoricQI Society of Federal Way to improve parking for
the Hylobos and I-flstoflcal Cabins. Site is underutiPtized because of the
the lack of acceseabllity.
)rlo~' Council RevtewlA,oproval:
/
I
Projected Expenditures ($1,000's)
Funds. Expensee L-T-O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2005 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Property AcQuisition $ -
Consultant Services $ 21 $ 21
Construction $ 216 $ 216
Ins0ec0on $
EQuipment AcQuisition $
Contingencies $ -
rotal¢lPExpensee I~F ~F '~F '~ ~F 21 ~ 216;~ - ~ =F '~F '=F ~ -IS - ~ ~ ~ 238
L- T-D refers to Lffe4o-Date, or total work oompfete on the project befora the currant budget year.
Requital Resources ($1,000's)
SIP Funds - Resources L-T-D 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Pdor Year Fundlocl $
Unallocated Fund Balance $
_
Real Estate ExCtSe Tax $ 25 $ 25
Fuel Tax - Path/Trail $ 10 $ 10
GO Bond $
General Fund $
Grants/Contributions Received $
Mitigation Funds Received $
Grants/Con~bufions AnUciDated $
Mitigation Funds-Anflctoated $
Unfonded Needs ' 1211182 1203
rotal ClPRaaourcee ~ - ~ - ~ 21 21til~ . ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ~ -;$ - ~ - $ 238
I lmpact on Operating Funds L-T-D 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2009 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Revenue Incma~/(Decmase)I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I $
Expenditure Increase/(Decmase)
Project Time Line
~roject Schedule Budget Year - 19~ Budget Year - 2000 Budget Year - 2001
Item Jan -Mar- JunJul -Se Oct- DecJan- Marl AI3r- Jun I Jul- SaD ~ Oct- Dec Jan -Mar Ar-JunJul - Se Oct- Dec
Proiect easibllitv tudv
Preliminary Design
Environmental Review
Final Design ~
ProDerW AcQuisition
Bid SPecifications ProD.
Bid & Award Contract
Project Construction
Other le.g. Equipment AcquisitionI
City of Federal Way ~si~e Perks, Recrea#~n en~ Open S~ce Plan Secti¢~ vi/. 22
City of Federal Way
Capita/Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
~'roject Name:
363rd OPEN SPACE
Project Account:
30~-7100-~-594-76
Project Deecrlpflon:
Master Ptan and develop I~oparty for open space park.
The Dro~ prelect is located in the Parks and Recreatlo~ Planning Area - D
Project Justification:
Purchased property in 1992 from the 1989 King County Open Space Program.
0 1~2 I KikxTte~r
Prior Council RavlawlAp~'ovel:
Projected Expenditures ($f,OOO'a)
ClP Funds - Expeneae L-T.O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Property Aceuisition $ -
Consultant Services $ 20 $ 20
Construction $ 52 $ 52
In$pacUon $
E0uIoment Acquisition $
Contin,enctes I f 7~
TctalClPExpeneae ~ - ~ - ~ - ~; 20 ~ 52 ~; ~ ~ - ~ -,~; .~ - ~ -,~; $ - $ -
L. T..D refers to L.ifi~o-Date , or total work comlY~te on the project before tl~e currant budget year.
Requital Re~ource~ ($1,000°e)
ClP Funds - Raeource$ L-T-O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
I:~ior Year Funding $
Unalloceted Fund Balance $
Real Estate Excise Tax $
Fuel Tax - path/Trail $
GO Bond $
General Fund $
Granis/ConMbutions Received $
Mtiklaflon Funds Received $
Grants/contributions Anticipated $
Mitigation Funds-Anticipated
Unfonded Needs I 20152 . ~ 7:~
Total CIPRe$ourcee ~ ' ~ ' I~ 20 52 ~i -~ ~ - ~i -~ ~ - ~ ~; ·$ $ 72
rmpact on Opemtlflg Funds L-T-O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total. I
Revenue Increase/(Decraace) 20t2
Expenditure Increase/(Decrease) ~
Nat impact ~i ' ~ ' ~ ' ~ ' ~ ' ~ ' ~ ' ~ ' ; ' ~ ' ~ ' ~ ' ; ' ; ' ~ ' ; :11
Project T/me Line
Pro~ect Schedule Budget Year - 1~99 Budget Year · 2000 aucl~et year · 2001
Item Jan- Mar r- JunJul-e Oct- DecJan ~Apf~ Ju~ Oct- Dec Jan- Mar r- JunJul- Se Oct- Dec
rolect easibilitv tud¥
Preliminary Deskln ~
Environmental Review
Final Design
Prooertv AcQuisition
Bid SDectllcations ProD.
Bid & Award Contract
Prolect Construction
Other (e.g. Equipment Acquisition)
City of Federal Way Compmhen~ P~k~, Recreation end Open Space Pisn Section VII - 23
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
Project Name:
NEW PARK DEVELOPMENT
Project Number: Project Account:
303-7100-~-594-76
Project Deecrlptlou:
Master Plan and develop park properUea redulrod to meet City's goals
Project Ju~tlflcetlou:
To meet park facility goals and standards adopted in Parks. Recreation
and Comprehensive Ptan.
Prior Council Review/Approval:
CIPFunde-Expan~es L-T-D 1990 2000 2001 2002 2005 2004 2005 2000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 I Total
Property Ac(~ulaitlon i $ '
Consultant Services $ 21 $ 22 I$ 43
ConstnJct~on $ 282 $ 287 $ 293 $ 299 $ 305 $ 311 $ 317 $ 323I$ 2,416
Inspection $
EauiPment Ac~uisition $
Contin,encies !I '
TotalClPExpeness , - , - , , - , 21 , 22 , , 202 ., 207 , 293 , 299 , 305 ~ 31t ~ 317 ~ 323 21459
L- T-D refers to Life.to-Date. or total work complete on the project before the currant budget year.
Required Resources ($1,000's)
CIP Funds - Resources L-T-O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prior Year Fundin¢; $
Unallocated Fund Balance $
Real Estate Excise Tax I $
Fuel Tax - Pa0~Trail I $
GO Bond $
Gene~l Fund $
Granta/Contributions Received $
Mitigation Funds Received $
_
Grants/ConMbutions Anticipated $ 282 $ 24 $ 293 $ 299 $ 94 $ 311 $ 317 $ 306 $ 1,926
MIt/~tation Funds-Anticipated $ 79 i $ 84 $ 18 $ 181
Unf~n0ed Needs I 21I 22 I~ 126 I169
TotalClPReeources , - , - ~; ~ - 21 22 , , 202 , 104 , 293 , 299 305 , 311 ~ 317 ~ 323 2,276
Impact on Operating Funds L-T.O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Expenditure Increese/(Decrease) 7 7 7 7 $ 7 7 $ 7 $ 49
Project T/me L/ne
Pro)ect Schedule Budget Year - 1999 Budget Year - 2000 Budget Year · 2001
Item Jan - MarI Apr - Jun I Jul - sep I oct - Dec Jan - MarI Apr - Jun I Jul - sep I oct - Dec Jan - MarI Apr - Jun I Jul - Sep I oct - Dec
Proiect Feasibility Study
PreliminarY Design
Environmental Review
Final Design
Pmparty Acquisition
Bid Spaciflcations PreD.
Bid & Award Contract
Proiect Construction
Other (e.g. Equipment ArC,d-it!on)
C~ of Fed~al Way Con~Patf~ Rec~a~ ~ld Oi~l Spege Plan Sec~on Vll - 24
City of Federal Way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parks and Recreation
Project Name:
PARK PLAY AREAS
Project Number: Project Account:
303-7100-~-594-76
Project Dseoripflon:
Purchase and install children play areas.
Project Justification:
Play areas have a useful life of 10 - 15 years. Repairs, replacersent and/or
expansion of play equipment and surfacing needed based on safety criteria.
Prior Council Revtaw/Approvah
~lP Funds -Expenses L-T.O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
ProoerN Acquisition $
Consultant Services $ -,
Construction $ 32 $ 33 $ 34 $ 36 $ 37 $ 39 $ 211
Inspection $ -
EouiDment AcQuisition
ContinFlencies
rotal ClPExpeneas ~i - ~i ~ 'i ~ ' ~ 32 ~i - ~ 33 ~; - ~ 34 ~; - ~ 301~i - ~ 37 ~; - ~ 39 21
L- T-D refers to Life-to-Date, or total work coml~ete on the project before the current budget year.
Required Resources ($1,000's)
~*lP Funds - Resources L-T-D 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Pdor Year Funding $
Unallocated Fund Balance S
Real Estate Excise Tax $
Fuel Tax - path/Trail $
GO Bond S
General Fund $
Grants/Contributions Received $
MiU0aUon Funds Received !i 10~
Grants/ConMbutions Actlctl)ated $ 33 $ 36 $ 37
Mltl~ation Funds-AntlciDated $ 39 39
Unfunded Needs . ~ 32 ' I 34 I 66
rotilClPReaourca$ ~ '1~ ~; - ~ 32 ~; ~; 33 ~ 34 ~ , ~ 36 ~ - ~; 37 ~; - $ 39 211
Project T/me Une
Project Schedule Budget Yesr - 1999 Budget Yesr - 2000 Budget Yesr - 2001
Item Jan - MarI Apr - Jun I Jul - sep I oct - Dec Jan - MarJ Apr- Jun J Jul - Sep oct - Dec Jan - MarI Apr - Jun I Jul -~ep I oct - Dec
Prolect Feasibility Studv
Pra~im~m~ v Design
Envlronrsent~l Review
Final Design
PrOoe~/AcQuisition
Bid S~ciflcatlons Prao.
Bid & Award Contract
Pmi~ct Construction
Other (e.g. Equiprsent Acquisition1
Cib/ of Fede~l Wey Co~8iw Perk& Rect~etion end Open Sl~ce Plen Section Vll - 25
~ty Ol Peoerai way
Capital Improvement Plan
Parl~ and Kecreatlon
Project Name:
FISHER'S POND
Project Number: Project Account:
303-7100-~-594-76
Project DeeorlpUofl:
Site and facility Improvemm~ts to utilize park as an intmpmtive ce~tor
for Federal Way Park System and to pmvlde citizens access to Federal
Way's history, ie, Historical Society
The Dro0geed proiect is located in the Parks and RecraaUon Planning Area -A
Project Justification:
- C/nange of use/Process III comptetad wtth conditions.
- Histoflcal society of Federal Way leases facility ta provide Historical Society
Services and stewardship of park grounds.
Prior Council Revlew/Approvah
Projected Expenditures ($I,000's)
'P Funds - Expensge L-T..D 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2000 2010 2011 2012 Total
Property Acquisition $
Consultant Sen'ices $ 21 $ 21
Construction $ 159 $ 159
Inspection $
Equipment Acquisition $
Contingencies $ -
Total ClPExpensge ~i - T ~ ~ - ~ 21 ~ 159 ~ ~ ' T ' ~ ~ ' ~ · ~ ' $ ' T -I$ - $ 180
L- T-D refers to Life-to-Date, or total wo~ complete on the projec~ before the currant budget Year.
Required Resources ($1,000's)
ClP Funds - Resources L-T-O 1999 2000 2Q01 2002 2003 2004 2005 2008 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prio~ Year Funding $
Unallocated Fund Balance $ 11 $ 11
Real Estate Excise Tax $ g $ 9
Fuel Tax. path/Trail $
GO Bond $
General Fund $
Grants/Contributions Received $
Mitigation Funds Received $
Grants/Contributions AnUcipated $
Mitigation Funds-Anticipated
Unfunded Needs $ 159 ~ 159
Total ClPRgeournss T 'i T ' T - ~ 21 T 150 ~ ~ ' I~ ' ~ ~ ' i~ ' ~; ~; ' I$ ' T ' T 180
Jlmpect on Operating Funda L-T-O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 201t 2012 Total J
Revenue thcrease/(Decrease) ? -
I
Expenditure Increase/(Decrease) ~
INet ImPact IT '1~ '1~ -IT '1~ 'l~ '1~ '1~ '1~ '1~ 'IT 'IT -is 'IT -I~ '1~ :1
Project Time Line
Pro~ect Schedule Budget Year - 1999 Budget Year - 2000 Budget Year - 2001
Item Jan - Mart Apr- Jun l Jul-SeplOct-Dac Jan-MariApr-Junl JuI-SeplOct-Dac ~an-"arl'T-~onl~u'-BerlO~-Oec
Project Feasibility Study
Preliminary Design
Fnvironmental Eevtew
Final Design
Properiy Acquisition
Bid Specifications Pmp.
Bid & Award Contract
Project Construction
Other {e.R. Equipment Acqulsition'~
C!ty of Federel Wey C,~nl~ehen~ve Perks, Recmefion end Open Space Plen s~c~on ~l . z6
ALEA ~nt for Dumas Bay ~ntre
PfOJM:t Numl~f: ProJ~t Ac~o41nt:
303-7100-~-594-76
Pro~:t De~cdpt~on:
The oml~:~ed txoiect I~ located in the Pnrk~ and Re,~watton Ptannlng A~a · A
Project
Pdor Council RI, view/Approval:
=lP Funde · Expen~ea L-T-D 1~ 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prope~y Acquisition $ .
Consultant Sen4ce~ $ 21 $ 21
ConstnJction $ 159 $ 159
I~pec0on $
Equllxnent Acqui~lUon $
L-T. O rei~rs to Lffe-to.Dete, or to~l wo~ complete un the project ~ ye #le current budget yeer.
Reeulmd aeaaam~ flf,eoo~j
:lP Funds - Reeourcea L-T-D 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 200~ 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Prior Year Funding $ -
Una#ocatnd Fund BMance S 11 $ 11
Real Estate Excise Tax $ 9 I $ 9
Fuel Tax. path/Tra# $
GO Bond $
General Fund $
G~ContrtlxJtions Received $
Mlflgedon Funds Received $
Gran~/Con.tbutlons Ant~ed $
Mitigation Funds-Anticipated $ -
Unfunded Needs ~ 159 ~ 159
I
Budget Year- 2000 Budget Year- 2001
Prolect Schedule Budget Year - 1999 MarI Apr. Jun I Jul - Sep I Oct - Dec
Item Jan - MarI Apr- Jun I Jul - Sep I (~ ' DeCl Jan -
jan-Marl A~'-du~I Jul- Se~ [ Oct- Dec
Pmjuc~ F _-_-=!-~-"-~-~ Study
Pre~ninary Design
Envkonnlen~l Review
Fin~ Design
Prolx~ty ACdul~ition
Bid Spec~c~ions Prep.
Bid & Awun:l Cont~c~
Project Con~trun~n
Other le.~. Eauloment AcquisitionI
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
July 13, 2000
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
Phil Watkins, Chair
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC)
Stephen Clifton, AICP, Director of Community Development Services
Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner ~
David M~~Vlanager
Amendments to the King Connty Countywide Planning Policies
BACKGROUND
The city has received a request from King County to review and ratify amendments to the King
County Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) (Exhibit A). Generally, the amendments include the
following:
1. Motion 99-1 (Exhibit B) - An amendment to the CPPs to adjust targets fbr new housing units to
reflect annexations and incorporations from April 1994 through January 1998.
Substitute Motion 99-2 (Exhibit C) - An amendment to the CPPs to reassign new housing
targets for Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs) and adoption of an interim Potential Annexation
Area Map (Exhibit D) that will remain interim until all unincorporated urban areas are included
in City PAAs without gaps or overlaps.
Motion 99-4 (Exhibit E) - An amendment to the CPPs to remove the six-year development
capacity work item and to incorporate the review and evaluation ("Buildable Lands") program
as required by the State Growth Management Act under RCW 36.70A.215.
II.
HISTORY
July 28, 1999
May 22, 2000
August 21, 2000
Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) adopted Motion 99-1,
Substitute Motion 99-2, and Motion 99-4, which recommend these
amendments.
Per Ordinance No. 13858 (Exhibit F), the King County Council approved and
ratified these amendments on behalf of the population of unincorporated King
County.
Federal Way will have been deemed to have ratified the amendment unless the
amendment is disapproved by legislative action.
Land Use Transportation Committee
Page 2
July 13, 2000
III. DISCUSSION
This section will address each amendment request followed by staff discussion.
1. Motion 99-1 - An amendment to the CPPs to adjust targets for new housing units to reflect
annexations and incorporations from April 1994 through January 1998 (Exhibit B).
Staff Discussion
Since the adoption of the CPPs in 1994 when the 20-year household targets were allocated,
there have been a number of incorporations of new cities and annexations by existing cities.
However, as these incorporations and annexations took place, households were not being
reallocated from unincorporated King County to cities. Therefore, unincorporated King County
was left with the same housing target that was originally established in 1994, while the amount
of land available to meet this target had decreased. The GMPC recommends amending
Appendix 2 (Proposed Growth Target Ranges for Households and Employment) (Exhibit G) of
the CPPs to account for the transfer of household targets from unincorporated King County to
cities as a result of annexations and incorporation. CPP Appendix 2A shows Household Growth
Target Re-Allocation Based on Annexations & Incorporations between April 1994 and
January 1998 (Page 3 of Exhibit B). The amendment to the policies would affect all cities and
is basically reallocating targets from unincorporated King County to cities as cities incorporate
or annex new land. For the City of Federal Way, this shows that Federal Way's target would
increase by 243 housing units, going from the original target of 13,425 - 16,566, to a new
target of 13,668 - 16,809. This increase is based on the 1994 Weyerhaeuser annexation of
approximately 700 acres. An interjurisdictional team led by King County demographer,
Chandler Felt, developed the methodology for the transfer of targets to cities. The City of
Federal Way participated in the discussion of the approved methodology, which amounts to the
addition of approximately 0.35 household per acre annexed.
Substitute Motion 99-2 -An amendment to the CPPs to reassign new housing targets for
Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs) and adoption of an interim Potential Annexation Area Map
(Exhibit D) which will remain interim until all unincorporated urban areas are included in
City PAAs without gaps or overlaps (Exhibit C).
Staff Discussion
This motion recommends amending the CPPs by adopting CPP Appendix 2B Household
Growth Target Re-Allocation Based on Annexations and Incorporations after January 1, 1998
(Page 3 of Exhibit C) to reassign targets from unincorporated King County to each city's PAA.
For the City of Federal Way, this shows that as of April 28, 1999, the City had been allocated
an additional 45 housing units (based on the Enchanted Park Annexation of approximately 72
acres, and the Weyerhaeuser North and South Annexations of approximately 47 acres). This
table also shows that the remaining target in the Federal Way PAA is 1,606 housing units.
Once all the PAA has been annexed, the target for the City, including all of the PAA, would be
15,319 to 18,460 units. This motion also adopts an Interim Potential Annexation Areas Map,
which shows PAAs, as adopted in jurisdictions' comprehensive plans (Exhibit D).
Land Use Transportation Committee
Page 3
July 13, 2000
Motion 99-4 - An amendment to the CPPs to remove the six-year development capacity work
item and to incorporate the review and evaluation ("Buildable Lands ") program as required
by the State Growth Management Act under RCW 36. 70A.215 (Exhibit E).
Staff Discussion
When the CPPs were initially adopted, the GMPC established the Land Capacity Task Force.
The purpose of this Task Force was to develop a standard methodology for measuring land
capacity (both residential and commercial/industrial) and also to develop a baseline set of
estimates to ensure that adequate capacity existed to meet the 20-year population projections
established by the State. The Task Force completed their work in 1998, concluding that there
was adequate capacity to meet the 20-year population projections. The remaining work for the
Task Force was to develop a method for calculating six-year development capacity. However,
in 1997, the Growth Management Act (GMA) was amended to adopt the "Buildable Lands"
legislation that required a review and evaluation program, which duplicated the work required
of the Task Force. Therefore, the GMPC recommends deleting the policy language requiring
the six-year capacity analysis, and replacing it with a policy supporting the "Buildable Lands"
program as required by the GMA.
IV
RECOMMENDATION
The recommendations contained in Motion 99-1 and Substitute Motion 99-2 are intended to adopt a
methodology to reallocate targets from King County to PAAs of cities, and also to transfer targets to
cities from their PAAs as annexations occur. In the case of incorporations, there is a transfer of
targets from unincorporated King County to cities. The policies affect all cities and are based on a
standard methodology prepared by an interjurisdictional team. Motion 99-4 is intended to remove
the need for duplicative monitoring of six-year capacity of jurisdictions.
Staff recommends that the LUTC forward a recommendation of approval to the full city council and
vote to ratify the proposed amendments to the CPPs.
V. LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
A June 8, 2000, Correspondence from King County~
B GMPC Motion No.99-1
C GMPC Motion Substitute Motion No. 99-2
D Interim Potential Annexations Area Map
E GMPC Motion No. 99-4
F King County Council Ordinance No. 13858
G Appendix 2 of the King County Countywide Planning Policies
H King County Council Staff Report
I:~KCWPPS\071700LU.WPD/July 13, 2000
lThe City of Federal Way never received the original correspondence from King County.
June 8,2000
The <<Salutation>> <<FIRST NAME>> <<LAST NAME>>
Mayor, <<ORGANIZATIONDEPARTMENTPUBLICATION>>
<<ADDRESS 1 >>
<<City>>, <<STATE>> <<ZIPCODE>>
Dear Mayor <<LAST_NAME>>:
We are pleased to forward for your consideration and ratification the enclosed amendments to
the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs).
The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) met on June 16th and July 28th 1999 and
approved the following motions:
Motion 99-1: recommends amending the CPPs to adjust targets for new housing units to
reflect annexations and incorporations from April 1994 through January 1998.
Substitute Motion 99-2: recommends amending the CPPs to reassign new housing
targets for potential annexation areas (PAAs) and adoption of an Interim Potential
Annexation Areas map which will remain interim until all unincorporated urban areas are
included in city PAAs without gaps or overlaps.
Motion 99-4: recommends amending the CPPs to remove the 6 year development
capacity work item and to incorporate the review and evaluation ("Buildable Lands")
program as required bY the State Growth Management Act under RCW 36.70A.215.
On May 22, 2000, the King County Council approved and ratified these amendments on behalf
of unincorporated King County. A copy of King County Ordinance 13858 is enclosed to assist
you in your review of these amendments, along with the council staff report.
As you know, amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified
by ordinance or resolution by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing
70 percent of the population of King County according to the Interlocal Agreement. A city will
be deemed to have ratified the amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies unless, within
90 days of adoption by King County, the city takes legislative action to disapprove the
amendments. Please be aware that the 90-day deadline in this instance is August 21, 2000. If
you have any questions about these amendments or the ratification process, please feel free to
contact Carol Chan, Policy Analyst for the Office' of Regional Policy and Planning at 205-0772,
or Laurie. Smith, Legislative Analyst for the Metropolitan King County Council at 296-0352.
The <<Salutation>> <<FIRST NAME>> <<LAST NAME>>
June 8, 2000
Page 2
PAG
If you adopt any legislation relative to this action, please submit one certified copy to Carol
Chan, Policy Analyst with the King County Office of Regional Policy and Planning at 516 3rd
Avenue, Room 402, Seattle, WA 98104. If no action is taken please submit a letter to the
above address stating the same.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Pete von Reichbauer, Chair
King County Council
Ron Sims
King. County Executive
Enclosures: King County Ordinance 13858 and Attachments
May 22, 2000 Staff Report
CC:
Laurie Smith, Legislative Analyst, Metropolitan King County Council
Stephanie Warden, Director, Office of Regional Policy and Planning
Carol Chan, Policy Analyst, Office of Regional Policy and Planning
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
May 26, 1999.
/pr
PAGE_LOFL
Sponsored By: ExecUtive Committee
MOTION NO. 99-1
A MOTION amending the Countywide Planning Policies to adjust targets
for new housing units to reflect annexations and incorporations from Apr/1
1994 through January 1998.
WHEREAS, the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established a housing target range for each
city and for King County, and annexations and incorporations have occurred since that time; and
WHEREAS, the 1994 targets need to be revised to establish target ranges for the ne~v incorporated
areas and to increase the target range for cities which have annexed formerly unincorporated areas,
and to correspondingly decrease the target range for unincorporated areas.
THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY
MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
The attached Table CPP Appendix 2A is hereby adopted in the Countywide
Planning Policies to revise housing growth targets to reflect annexations and
incorporations fi.om April 1994 through January 1998.
L/GMPC/99GMPC/Mot99-1 .doc - I -
1
2
3
4
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
7-"..?-R- ~'? and signed by the members of the GMPCKC Executive Committee on
/3' - 7 - ~ '7 in open se~
~rowlh M~nagement Planning Council
onal"d{on, City of Seattle Representative
Bo~ Edwards, Suburban Cities RePresentative
Attachment:
1. Table CPP Appendix 2A - Household Grow'th Target Re-Allocation Based on Annextions
and Incorporations between 4/94 and 1/98.
L/GMPCI99GMPC/Mot99-1 .doc - 2 -
~-[CPP Appendix 2A L I i I 14/28/99 draft
~Household Growth Target Re-Allocation Based on Ar~nexations & Incorporations between 4/94 & 1/98 I
Column A Column B1 Column B2 Column C -
Adopted Household Target Added Through Target Added Through New Target Effective 1 / 98
Growth Target Incorporation Annexation (A+81 +B2)
Jur!s,,diction Low: High: 4/94 to 1/98 4/94 to 1/98 Low:~ Hi,c/h:
Algona 346 462 0 0! 346 · 462
Aubum 6553 9610 0 6 6559 9616
Beaux Arts 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bellevue 7680 9550 0 112 779; 9662
Black Diamond 947 1119 0 591 1538 1710
Bothell 1448 2413 0 20 1468 2433
Burien 1596 1995 0 0 1596 1995
Carnation 404 404 0 0 404 404
Clyde Hill 12 12 0 0 12 12
Covingten n/a n/a 1493 0 1343 1642
Des Moines 1437 2155 0: 358 1795 25131
Duvall 1563 1759 0. 0 1563 1759~
Enumclaw 2182! 2667 0 0 2182 2667
Federal Way 13425 16566 0 243 13668 16809
Hunts Point 4! 4 0 0 4 4
I ssaquah 1879 3508 0 686 2565 4194
Kent 6120 7500 0 22651 8385 9765
Kirkland 5328 6346 0 0 5328i 6346
Lake Forest Park 101 168 0 316 417 484
Maple Valley n/a n/a 1539 0 1385 1692
Medina 17 17 0 0 17 17
Mercer Island 1056 1188 0 0 1056 1188
ilton 18 18 0 11 29 29
Newcastle nla n/a 833 0 749 916
Normandy Park 135 135 0. 0 135 135
North Bend 1266 1787 0~ 0 1266 1787
!Pacific 606 1818 0 0 606 1818
Redmond 9637 12760 0 418 10055 13178
Renton 7730 10049 0 70 7800 10119
Seattle 48233 59520 0 0 48233 59520
SeaTac 3546 7500 0 2 3548 7502
Shoreline n/a n/a 2484 75 2303 2814
Skykomish 27 27 0 0 27 27
Snoqualmie 1942 3625 0 0 1942 3625
Tukwila 4761 6014 0 0 476' 6014
Woodinville 1750 1842 0 I 1751 1843
Yarrow Point 18 18 0 0 18 18
City Total: 131,767 '172,5561 6,349. 5,174 142,646 184,71
Unincorporated County: 40,048 50,000 -6,349 -5,174 28,525 38,477.]
- urban 34,248; 41,800 -6,34S -5,174 22,725 30,2771
- rural 5,800 8,200 0 01 5,800 8,200
Total King County Target: 171,815 222,556 0 0
I I
All columns are household growth targets, expressed as numbers of households to accommodate during the 20-year Growth Management period.
Column A represents adopted household targets from Appendix 2 of the Countywide Planning Policies.
~Column B1 represents household targets associated with incorporated areas between 4/94 and 1/98. _
Column B2 represents household targets associated with annexed areas between 4/94 and 1/98.
;lumn C represents sum of adopted household targets, incorporated, and annexed targets, including ranges for new cities.
Methodology: Column A growth targets were based on city boundaries as 01~ Apdl' :1994. Columns B1 and B2 are additional households to be __
accommodated due to incorporation (B1) or annexation (B2) between Apdl 1994 and January 1998. These additional households constitute a _
proportional share of the urban unincorporated targets by Community Planning Area. The additional households are based on the land-area
proportion of urban unincorporated area less designated parks and mapped water bodies. That proportion is applied to the Planning Area's urban~
target, the midrange of the table on page 30 of the King County Comprehensive Plan. [
i I f I CPP2A.xls _
$
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
May-g6June 15, 1999
/pr
PAGE_J_ r
Sponsored By:
Executive Committee
Substitute MOTION NO. 99-2
A MOTION amending the Countywide Planning Policies to assign new
housing targets for potential annexation areas.
WHEREAS, the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established a housing target range for each
city and for King County, and annexations and incorporations have occurred since that time;
WHEREAS, the housing targets have been revised to reflect annexation and incorporation that
have occurred between April 1994 and January 1998; and
Vv'-I-tEREAS, there is a need to establish household target ranges for the remaining potential
annexation areas in order to correspondingly ~identi .fy the target range for King County in
the urban area out~ide current potential annexation area~;:
WHEREAS, there is a need to advise cities about how their respective housing target~ would
increase if the existing agreed upon potential annexation area~ were now annexed; and
WHEREAS. housing targets will change over time as the region receiv¢~ new census data.
THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY
MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
The attached Table CPP Appendix 2B and Interim Potential Annexation Areas Map
are hereby adopted ;~
~, ......... o .......... ~, ......................... to estimate housing targets for the
Potential Annexation Areas as shown on the Interim Potential Annexation Area
(PAA) Map. The Interim PAA MaN describes the areas receiving target allocations
in Table CPP App.endix 2B. This map is considered interim until all
unincorporated urban areas are included in ci_ty PA_As without gaps or overlaps.
This map may also be amended to reflect other CPP policy direction.
I_JGMPC/99GMPC/Mot99-2.doc - i -
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ADOPTED by the GroWth Management Planning Council of King County on
'7-~¢'~--~'~' and signed by the members of the GMPCKC Executive Committee on
/o~- 7 -Q~ in open sessio ~i~i,cation of it.s adoption. '
· qS, on~a r, Growth Management Planning Council
u~e~E~'s o~n, C'Co~f S~e ~esez~tative
Bob Edwards, Suburban Cities Representative
(ise~ller, King C;unty Representative
Attachments:
1. CPP Appendix 2B - Household Growth Target Re-Allocation based on Annexations and
Incorporations after 1/1/98 and Potential Annexation Areas.
2. Interim Potential Annexation Areas Map
EXH I ,
PAGE__.[OF
I~GMPC/99GMPC/Mot99-2.doc '~ 2 -
CPP Appendix 2B DRAFT 4 / 28 / 99
These are draft estimates of growth targets associated with recent
incorporations and po ten rial annexa tion areas (PAAs).
Household Growth Target Re-Allocation Based on Annexations and Incorporations after 1/1/98
& Potential Annexation Areas
Column A Column B-1 Column B-2 Column C
H'hold Growth Target to 1/98 iTarget from Completed Target Remaining Total Target ( A + B )
Jurisdiction LOw: Hi,Ih: Annexation or Incorp in PAAs Iow: Hi,Ih:
Algona ' ~46 462: 0 15 361 477
Auburn 6559 9616; 1 1977 8537 11594~
Beaux Arts 0
Bellevue 7792: 9662 6 515 8313 1018:
Black Diamond 1538 1710 0 353 1891 2063
Bothell 1468 2433 4 '309 1781 2746
Burien 1596 1995 71 0 1667 2066
Carnation 404 404 0 0 404 40,~
Clyde Hill 12 12
Covington 1343 1642 O 0 1343 1642
Des Moines 1795 2513 381 0~ 1833 2551
Duvall 1563 1759 0 01 1563 1759
Enumclaw 2182 2667 0 0 2182 2667
Federal Way 13668 16809 45 1606 15319! 18460
Hunts Point 4 4 0 0 4 4.
Issaquah 2565 4194 11 1538 4i14 5743
Kenmore % 0 0i 1082 0 974 1190i
Kent 8385 97651 0 1980 ' 10~65 11745
Kirkland 5328 6346 0 1248 6576 7594
Lake Forest Park 417 ,~84 18 38 473 540
Maple Valley 1385 1692 0 0 1385 1692
Medina 17 17 0 0 17 17
Mercer Island 1056 1188 O 0 1056 1188
Milton 29 29 11 59i 99 99
Newcastle 749 916 3 2! 7'54 921
'Normandy Park 135 135 0 01 135 135
North Bend 1266 " 1787 0 0 1266! 1787'
Pacific 606 1818 0 73 679 1891
Redmond 10055 13178 ' '~3 ' ' 293 10348 1'34~1
Renton 7800 10119~ 60 4260 12120 144391
Sammamish % 0 OI 5465 0 4919 6012
Seattle 48233 595201 0 33 48266 5955'3
SeaTac 3548i 7502 0 5 3553 7507
Shoreline 2303 2814 0 108 2411 2922
Skykomish 27 27 0 0 27 27
Snoqualmie 1942 3625 0 0 1942 3625
Tukwila 4761 6014 0 36 4797 6050
Woodinville 1751 1843 01 0 1751 1843
Yarrow Point 18 18 . .01 01 18 1'8
City Total: 'i 42,646 184,719 6,815 13,973"i 162,779 206,162
Unincorp. County 28,525 38,477 -6,815 -13,973 7737* 17,689
- urban 22,725 30,277 -6,815 -i3,973 1,937 9,489
- rural 5;800 8,200 0 0 5,800 8,20~)'
Total Target: 171,171 2:23,196 0 0 170,516 223,581
Column A represents household growth targets adjusted for annexation and incorporation through 1/98.
Column B represents household targets associated with recent annexations, two new cities and potential annexation areas.
Column C represents sum of adopted targets, annexed / incorporated targets, and targets in PAAs.
Due to overlapping PAAs, some duplication occurs in PAA targets. This total eliminates duplicate targets.
Represents areas of King County not covered by potential annexation areas. ~1~=~ ~ ~ .f1~' r
% Target for Kenmore and Sammamish..incorporated after January 1998. is draft for ~l~iln I~e~. ~, ._ .~ _ l / 99 Craft
mA t--
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
July 16, 1999
Sponsored By:
EXecutive Committee
cc/Is
MOTION NO. 99-4
A MOTION amending the Countywide Planning Policies to remove the 6
year development capacity work item and to incorporate the review and.
evaluation program as required by the State's Growth Management Act
under RCW 36.70A.215.
WHEREAS, In 1994, the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) established the Land
Capacity Task Force (LCTF) and charged them to produce an improved, updated set of land
capacity estimates, to establish a baseline from which regular, ongoing monitoring could Proceed;
WHEREAS, The LCTF has reviewed and recommended a standardized methodology for
jurisdictions to measure the zoned land capacity for residential, and non-residential development
for the 20 year planning period;
WHEREAS, The jurisdictions have completed this analysis and the results show that the
jurisdictions in King County have adequate capacity to accommodate the growth expected in their
20-year plans;
WHEREAS, The remaining work program item for the LCTF is to develop a method for
calculating 6-year development capacity;
WHEREAS, In 1997 the State Growth Management Act was amended to require a review and
evaluation program be established in King and five other counties and the cities within those
counties consistent with elements of RCW 36.70A.215;
WHEREAS, The review and evaluation program required of King County and its cities will
produce information to inform the GMPC and the jurisdictions on whether there is sufficient land
· to accommodate the countywide population projection, determine whether the actual density of
housing constructed and the amount of land developed for commercial and industrial uses within
the urban growth boundary is consistent with the adopted comprehensive Plans, and to determine
the amount of land needed for commercial, industrial and housing for the remaining portion of the
20 year planning period; and
WHEREAS, The review and evaluation program will provide information that is similar to what
the 6-year development capacity would have provided;
L/GM PC/99GMPC/Mot99-4 .doc
PAG E___l_ D
1
2
3
'4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
i2
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY
MOVES
AS
FOLLOWS:
1. Amend the following policy: ~"" ' ' ~ "
PAGE__
FW-l Countywide growth management is a multi-step process...
Step 5a:
G i C il ,.1-,,. 11
The rowth Management Plann ng ounc or :.ts~,,...,~,~,o,,~ .......... ~, .....
established a Land Capacity Task Force to accomplish the work program
prepared in April 1994 to~ ^ .... ~:v .a).
~ ..... vv ....... The Task Force completed the
Residential Land Capaci .ty Report in 1997 and the Industrial and
Commercial Land CapaCity Report in 1998. In 1999, in order to comply
with RCW 36.70A.215, the April 1994 work program was deleted and
replaced with the State's review and evaluation program.
Step 5b:
The Growth Management Planning Council or its successor shall conduct
a review and evaluation p[ogram in compliance with RCW 36.70A.215.
The purpose of the review and evaluation program shall be to determine
whether King County and its cities are achieving urban densities within
Urban Growth Areas. This shall be accomplished by comparing the
growth and development assumptions, targets and objectives contained in
these policies (and in coun .ty and city comprehensive plans) with actual
growth and development that has occurred. If the results of this program
are inconsistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act
(GMA), King County and its cities shall identify reasonable measures in
accordance with the CMA, other than adjusting the Urban Growth Areas,
that will-be taken to comply with those requirements.
2. Delete Appendix 4, the April 1994 Land Capacity Work Program.
ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on 7 ~as~9"q ~
and signed by the members of the GMPCKC Executive Committee on /a)- - 7 -q'~ in
open session in authentication of its adopti/sm~ ~ ^
Ron SlUr, Gr°wth-"~anagement Planning Council
~u'~Don'~la dson, City of Seattle Representative
Bob Edwards, Suburban Cities Representative
r, King County Representative
L/GMPC/99GMPC/Mot99-4.doc - 2 -
KING COUNTY
Signature Report
May .31, 2000
Ordinance 13858
1200 King County Courthouse
516 Third Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Proposed No. 2000-0212.2 Sponsors Sullivan
AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the
Countywide Planning Policies under RCW 36.70A.210;
ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies for
unincorporated King County; and amending Ordinance
10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and
Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C.
20.10.040.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY:
SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings.
A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the GMPC
recommended King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies (Phase i) in July, 1992,
under Ordinance 10450.
B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II
amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance
11446.
Ordinance 13858
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
34
35
36
37
38
39
4O
41
C. The GMPC met on July 29, 1999, and voted to pass amendments to the King
County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies [5/25/94], to accomplish the following:
1. Amend Appendix 2A to revise the housing growth targets to reflect
annexations and incorporations from April 1994 to January 1998;
2. Adopt Appendix 2B and the Interim Potential Annexation Areas Map to
include the estimated housing targets for the potential annexation areas as shown on the
Interim Potential Annexation Area (PAA) Map. The Interim PAA Map describes the
areas receiving target allocations in Table CPP Appendix 2B;
3. Amend Framework Policy FW-1 (Step 5a) to reflect the completio;n of the
work charged to the land capacitY task force;
4. Amend Framework Policy FW-1 (Step 5b) to establish a review and
evaluation program in compliance with RCW.36.70A.215; and
5. Delete Appendix 4, the April 1994 Land Capacity Work Program.
SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are
each hereby amended to read as follows:
Phase II. A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide
Planning Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted.
B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning
Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027.
C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning
Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421.
D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning
Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260.
Ordinance 13858
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
5O
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning
Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415.
F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning
Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to this ordinance.
SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are
each hereby amended to read as follows:
Ratification for unincorporated King County. A. Countywide Planning
Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes specified are hereby ratified on
behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
D. The Phase II amendments to the King CoUnty 2012 Countywide Planning
Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population'of
unincorporated King County.
E. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as
shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the
population of unincorporated King County.
F. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as
shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
population of unincorporated King County.
G.
The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as
EXHIBIt?
Ordinance 13858
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
shown by Attachments ! and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
population of unincorporated King County.
H. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as
shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of
the population of Unincorporated King County.
I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Plannin~ Policies, as
shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to this Ordinance, are hereby r, atified on behalf of the
population of unincorporated King County.
Ordinance 13858 was introduced on 3/13/00 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on
5/22/00, by the following vote:
Yes: 12 o Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Miller, Ms. Fimia, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Pelz, Mr. McKenna,
Ms. Sullivan, Mr. Nickels, Mr. Pullen, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague and Mr. Vance
No: 0
Excused: 1 - Mr. Irons
KING COUNTY COUNCIL
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ATTEST:
Anne Nods
Anne Noris
Ordinance 13858
APPROVED this __ day of
Anne Noris
Attachments A. GMPC Motion 99-1, dated 5/26/99, with attachments, B. GMPC Substitute Motion 99-
2, dated 6/15/99, with attachments, C. GMPC Motion 99-4, dated 7/16/99
PAGE_ OF
Proposed Growth Target Ranges for Households and Employment
Net New Net New Hhld Ranges Net New Net New Emp.. Ranges
,CTI'IES ,,Households LLow ! High Employment ,Low I Hil~h
Algona 404 346 462 350 300 400
Auburn 8,082 6,553 9,610 11,100 9,000 13,200
Beaux Arts 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bellevue 8,575 7,680 9,55O 28,250 253OO 31,200
Black Diamond 1,033 947 1,119 1,200 1,100 1.300
Bothell (KC part) 1,931 1,448 2,413 2,900 2,150 3,6oo
Burien 1,796 1,596 1,995 450 40O 50O
Carnation 404 404 404 0 0 0
Clyde Hill 12 12 12 0 0 0
Des Moines 1,796 1,437 2,155 2,500 2,000 3,000
Duvall 1,886 1,563 1,759 1,700 1,600 1,80o
Enumclaw 2,626 2,182 2,667 1,000 900 1,100
Federal Way 14,996 13,425 16,566 14,800 13~300 16,400
Hunts Point 4 4 4 0 0 0
Issaquah 2,694 1,879 3.5o8 4,300 3,000 5,600
Kent 6,735 6,120 7,5O0 11,500 10,450 12,550
Kirkland 5,837 5,328 6,346 8,600 7,800 9200
Lake Forest Park 135 101 168 200 150 250
Medina 17 17 17 0 0 0
Mercer Island 1,122 1,056 1,188 1,700 1,600 1,800
Milton 18 18 18 0 0 0
Normandy Park 135 135 135 0 0 0
North Bend 1,527: 1,266 1,787 2,050 1,700 2,400
Pacific 1,212 606 1,818 100 50 150
Redmond 11,458 9,637 12,760 29,509 29,500 .M,750
i Renton 8,890 7,730 10,049 23,000 20,000 26,o00
SeaTac 3,592 3,546 7,5o0 15,800 15,600 26,900.
Seattle 53,877 48233 59,520 132,700 118,800 146,~00:
i Skykomish 27 27 27 0 0 0
Snoqualmie 2,784 1,942 3,625 4,500 3,100 5,820
Tukwila 5,388 4,761 6,o14 22,250 19,000 24,0o0
Woodinville 1,796 1,750 1,842 1,950 1,900 2,000
Yarrow Point 18 18 18 0 0 0
City Totals 150,803 131,768 172,558 322,409 288,700 370,620
Unine. KC 44,897 40,0481 50,o00 25,000 23,300 1 28,700
GRAND,TOTAL 195,700 171,8161 222,558 347,409l 312,0001 39.9,320
Source: Growth Management'Planning Council, May 14, 1994.
PAGE._._,[OF ,,! ,,,
Metropolitan King County Council
Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee
Revised Staff Report
Agenda Item No.: Name:
Proposed Ordinance: 2000-0212 Date:
Attending: Paul Reitenbach, Office of Regional Policy and Planning
Laurie Smith
SUBJECT:
An Ordinance adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies pursuant to RCW 36.70A.210 and
ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King County.
BACKGROUND:
In 1999, the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) adopted the following three motions recommending
amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs):
Motion 99-1: Amending the countyWidb Plachihg policies to adju~;ttargetS for neW h0USing units to reflect
annexations and incorPOrations fr0i:n April 1994 through January i~98 (see At[achment
2000-0212).... ~. ~ .
Summary: Since the adoption of the CPPs in May 1994, there have been numerous annexations and
incorporations. These annexations and incorporations have significantly reduced the size and population of
unincorporated King County, and increased the size and population of specific incorporated cities. The GMPC
recommends amending Appendix 2 (household growth targets) to the CPPs to account for the transfer of
unincorporated lands to the jurisdiction of incorporated cities. The housing targets associated with each annexation
or incorporation would be assumed by the annexing (or new) jurisdiction. An interjurisdictional team led by King
County Demographer Chandler Felt developed the revised housing targets.
Vote: Motion 99-1 was adopted by a vote of 5 Y2 to 0 on June 16th, 1999.
Substitute Motion 99-2: Amending the CountYWide Planning PoliCies to reassign new housing targets for potential
annexation areas (see Attachment 2 to Proposed Ordinance 2000~0212).
Summary: In order to advise cities the extent to which their housing targets will increase once Potential Annexation
Areas are annexed, the GMPC recommends adding a new table to Appendix 2 of the CPPs, assigning target ranges
to potential annexation areas. Additionally, Motion 99-2 adopts an Interim Potential Annexation Areas Map, which
shows the boundaries of potential annexation areas as adopted in local jurisdictions' comprehensive plans,
Vote: Motion 99-2.was adopted by a vote of 5 ¼ to 0 on June 16th, 1999.
Motion 99'4: Amending the Countywide Planning Policies to remOve the 6iYe,a_r development capaCity work item
and to incorPorate the reVieTM and e~al8ation Pi6~r~ ~§;reqfi Ced b~ the State s Growth Management Act Under
RCW 36.70A.2i5.
Summary: In conjunction with the initial adoption of the CPPs, the GMPC established the Land Capacity Task
Force (LCTF) to develop a standard methodology for measuring land capacity, and to produce a baseline set of
estimates to ensure adequate urban area capacity (both residential and commercial/industrial). The LCTF
completed their work in 1998, concluding that there was adequate capacity to meet the 20-year population
projections set forth by the State. The remaining work item for the LCTF was to develop a method for calculating 6-
year development capacity, however in 1997 the GMA was amended to require a review and evaluation program
that would essentially duplicate the work of the LCTF with respect to the 6-year analysis. Therefore, the GMPC
recommends deleting the policy language requiring a 6-year capacity analysis, and replacing it with a policy
supporting the "Buildable Lands" program, as required by GMA.
Vote: Motion 99-4 was adopted unanimously on July 28% 1999.
SUMMARY:
C:\WINI)OWS\TEMP\2000-0212 (CPP Amendments - targets)(Revised).doc 05/31/00 2:14 PM
Proposed Substitute Ordinance 2000-0212 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by:
· Adjusting housing targets to reflect the annexations and incorporations that occurred'between April, 1994 and
January, 1998;
· Assign housing targets to Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs), to advise jurisdictions the extent to which their
respective housing targets would increase if certain PAAs are annexed;
· Removing the 6-year development capacity work item and replacing it with the review and evaluation ("Buildable
Lands" ) program required by the Washington State Growth Management Act.
Additionally, the ordinance would ratify the changes on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as
required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9.
Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at
least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County according to the
Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days
of adoption by King County, they city by legislative action disapproves the countywide planning policy.
ATTACHMENTS:
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\2000-0212 (CPP Amendments - targets)(Revised).doc 05/31/00 2:14 PM
DATE:
TO:
VZA:
FROM:
SUB.1ECT:
July 12, 2000
Phil Watkins, Chair
Land Use / Transportation Committee
David M~'i~~'lanager r'~~
History
The Growth Management Act (GMA), passed by the' State Legislature in 1990, requiresthat counties
and cities develop a collaborative set of countywide planning policies (CPPs) to guide the
development of each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan.
To provide a forum for discussing and developing King County's CPPs, the county, Seattle, and
suburban cities signed an interlocal agreement setting up the Growth Management Planning
Council (GMPC). A formal body, GMPC consists of elected officials from King County (6), Seattle
(3), Bellevue (1), the Suburban Cities Association (6 members, 3 votes), and special purpose
districts (2 ex-officio). All CPPs adopted by the GMPC must be ratified by at least 30% of the
jurisdictions containing at least 70% of the population in the county.
Current SCA representatives include Councilmember Trish Borden (Auburn), Councilmember
Terry Brazil (Des Moines), Councilmember Judy Clibborn (Mercer [sland), Mayor Howard Botts
(Black Diamond), Councilmember Shirley Thompson (SeaTac), and Mayor .loan Simpson (North
Bend). Alternates include Mayor George Rossman (Enumclaw), Mayor Scott 3epson (Shoreline),
Councilmember Richard Cole (Redmond) and Councilmember 3eanne Burbidge. King County
staffs the meeting, and SCA's executive director and planning directors staff the SCA caucus.
Countywide Planninq Policies
The GMPC developed and adopted Countywide Planning Policies in two phases. Phase I,
adopted in 1992, created the urban growth boundary. Phase TI: addressed urban centers, 20-
year targets for household and employment growth in each jurisdiction, and policies on
economic development, housing affordability, housing density, and economic development.
Recent Activities
Since the adoption of the Phase TI CPPs, GMPC has focused its attention on a number of policy
issues, many of which are the subject of the Phase TT policies. Over the past year, the GMPC
has focused primarily on rural policies, housing density, affordability, production and target
Land Use / Transportation Committee
GMPC Status Report
July 12, 2000
Page 2
issues, and the Endangered Species Act. Some of the highlights include the following:
Rural Countywide Planninq Policies
In December of 1999, the GMPC reviewed proposed amendments to the Rural Countywide
Planning Policies (CPPs). At the October 27, 1999 GMPC meeting, GMPC members directed staff
to bring CPP amendments in motion form for their consideration on December 15, 2000. The
specific issue related to whether the County wanted to establish rural caps on the production of
housing in order to channel growth into urban areas. The GMPC members voted to: 1) amend
CPP FW-:L0, specifically making the rural growth target a cap, and limits on subdivision activity
as an appropriate tool to achieve the cap, and 2) support amending CPPLU-12 to require the
application of Iow-density zoning.
Housin;I
On December 7, 1999, representatives from suburban cities, the real estate and building
industries and 1000 Friends of Washington were part of a panel that discussed housing
production and development regulations in King County. The Housing Panel was divided into
two parts. The first included the planning directors of SeaTac, Steve Butler; Federal Way,
Stephen Clifton; Bellevue, Matt Terry; and Shoreline, Tim Stewart. Their presentations focused
on six questions: 1) How have the CPPs targets been achieved? 2) What other provisions are
needed to accommodate the targets? 3) How has it worked? 4) How have the cities dealt with
problems? and, 5) Has housing production been as consistent as you anticipated?
Stephen presented information on many of the actions the City has taken to help produce
housing in Federal Way in addition the City's investment in infrastructure. This information was
shared on an informal basis with Land Use and Transportation members. Stephen also shared
with the GMPC members that King County is developing housing within Federal Way's Potential
Annexation Area at approximately the same rate as Federal Way.
In March of 2000, the GMPC hosted a housing retreat. The goal of the retreat was to identify
key housing problems, the roles of various stakeholders, and practical solutions related to
housing production and affordability. Stephen Clifton and ! both attended the meeting. During
the first half of the retreat, participants worked in table groups to develop problem or issue
statements that King County jurisdictions face in meeting their goals for housing production and
affordability. The second half of the day, participants worked on solutions to the housing
production issue. After reviewing and synthesizing a set of problem/issue statement, groups
selected a few for developing potential solutions
At the conclusion of the retreat, five actions were identified by the development community that
jurisdictions could be taking to affirm their commitments to housing. Before proceeding with a
discussion on these actions at the GMPC, it was determined that that GMPC should first identify
Land Use / Transportation Committee
GMPC Status Report
July 12, 2000
Page 3
which and how many jurisdictions had already considered and acted on the proposed actions. A
survey of all jurisdictions was prepared and expanded to include a total of nine actions.
On June 28, 2000, the GMPC listened to a summary of responses to a housing survey, which
was sent to jurisdictions within King County. A packet of responses was given to the GMPC
members. A response from the City of Federal Way, dated May 26, 2000, was given to each
Federal Way Councilmember in May. The survey focused on programmatic EIS, shared parking,
wood structures above 4 stories, accessory dwelling units, jobs/housing balance, raising SEPA
thresholds, public education campaign about the Growth Management Act, and developer
pairings (commercial and housing developers).
Endanqered S~)ecies Act (ESA~
The GMPC discussed this issue in July and December of 1999 and February of 2000. Similar to
the City of Federal Way, the GMPC has attempted to prepare a plan of action to address the
requirements of the ESA. In December of 1999, a set of recommended amendments to the
Countywide Planning Policies (CPP) was provided to the GMPC. It was difficult for the GMPC
subcommittee to make a firm recommendation to the full GMPC on the amendments because of
the ongoing negotiations with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) regarding regulatory
requirements for 4(d) coverage. In February of this year, the GMPC discussed the ESA policies
and provided comments and amendments to proposed policies. Proposed CPPs were also
discussed in April. As in the City of Federal Way, there is still much uncertainty as to the full
extent or impact of the ESA '~(d) rule on local and state jurisdictions.
Conclusion
My first six months as an alternate member of GMPC have been both interesting and rewarding.
Please let me know if I can provide additional information on any topic, or if you have any issues
or concerns which should be raised on the City Council's behalf before the GMPC.
GMPC agendas and minutes online at http://www.metrokc.qov/exec/orpp/gmpc/
Date:
To:
Via:
From:
RE:
July 11, 2000
Federal Way Land Use and Transportation Committee
Chair: Phil Watkins, City Councilmember
David Mo~anager
Stephen Clifton, Community Development Services Dire~
Sound Transit Update
At the request of the Land Use and Transportation Committee (LUTC), this
memorandum has been prepared to provide you with an update on recent activities
related to three specific projects proposed for the Federal Way area. These include the:
1) Federal Way Transit Center and Parking Structure (City Center) with HOV direct
access ramps from :[-5, 2) Star Lake Park & Ride Lot with direct access to an in-line
station within the median of I-5, and 3) SR-99 Pacific Highway South Park & Ride Lot,
due south of South 272nd Street (plans not available at this time).
The Sound Transit Project Management Team (PM'r) last met on .lune 22, 2000.
Significant topics discussed included cost estimates for the Federal Way City Center,
Star Lake, and SR99 (Pacific Highway South]) Park and Ride facilities, Environmental
Assessment schedule, and design features of the Star Lake in-line station and
pedestrian bridge.
1. Budget
As mentioned in the May 9, 2000 memorandum to the LUTC, during the May 3,
2000 Executive Advisory Committee meeting, Sound Transit representatives
stated that the Star Lake and Pacific Highway South projects may be under
budget, while the Federal Way Transit Center is most likely over budget. The
specific amounts were not available at that time. Sound Transit did state that, if
funding can't be found by transferring savings from other projects, securing
additional grants, or reducing the cost of the City Center project, they were
considering options to reduce the Federal Way Transit Center cost. Options
mentioned by Sound Transit included eliminating the clock tower and top floor of
the parking structure, and revising the design of the facade.
At the .lune 22, 2000 PMT meeting, Fred Chou, Sound Transit Project Manager,
presented cost estimates for all three projects and the HOV Direct Access Ramp
which will serve the Federal Way Transit Center. Attachment A contains tables
listing cost estimates associated with each project. As noted in the first table,
the Federal Way Transit Center is budgeted at $14,300,000.00; the estimated
cost to construct the facility is $34,769,000.00. Sound Transit is now proposing
to bundle the projects together with the realized savings from the other two
projects and the HOV Direct Access Ramp @ 317t" Street being used to offset
the difference. By combining the projects, the total budgeted amount of
$84,394,000 for all the projects is sufficient to cover the projected costs of
$83,731,000. The Project Management Team was supportive of this approach.
2. Environmental [ssuance
The May 9, 2000 memorandum to the LUTC, noted that the Environmental
Assessments would be completed in the summer of 2000. The expected date of
issuance is now October of this year. The delay relates to the length of time it
has taken the federal government to review and respond to the draft
documents.
3. Design Features of the Star Lake [n-Line Station and Pedestrian Bridge
Attachment B depicts a conceptual elevation of the proposed entry structure to
the pedestrian bridge. The bridge will cross the southbound lanes of ]Interstate 5
and connect to an in-line station within the median of ]Interstate 5. PMT
members mentioned ways to improve security and what types of materials might
improve the aesthetics and discourage vandalism. Refinement of the structure
will take place during the next design phase of this project.
If you have any questions related to this project, please contact me at (253) 661-4109
or e-mail at Stephen.Clifton@ci.federal-way.wa.us.
Federal Way Transit Center/Parkin~l Structure
=hase
~gency Development
=E/ED
=S&E
3onstruction/ROW Acquisition
.~ontingency
total
~,vailable Bud~let
Note: all amount in year 2000 $
=rojected Costs ( in 1,000's)
$1,738
$1,160
$3,596
$24,798
$3,477
$34,769
$14,3:0
HOV Direct Access Ramp (~317th
=hase
~,gency Development
3E/ED
3S&E
3onstruction/ROW Acquisition
.~ontingency
rotal
~,vailable Budget
Projected Costs ( in t,000's)
$1,238
$1,333
$2,916
$16,810
$2,477
$24,774
$29,192
In-Line Station (~S. 272nd Street
=hase
~,gency Development
~E/ED
~S&E
3onstruction/ROW Acquisition
Contingency
Total
Available Bud~let- Est. Cost
Projected Costs ( in 1,000's)
$1 ,O97
$1,094
$3,102
$14,461
$2,194
$21,948
$31,292
Pacific Highway P&R Lot *
hase
~gency Development
E/ED
S&E
IovOnStruction/ROW Acquisition
ontingency
tal
ailable Bud~let
Projected Costs (in 1,000's)
$112
$493
$1,500
$135
$2,240
$9,510
- cost--
* King County Responsible for ROW acquistion, Final Design and
Construction Phases of the project.
ombine 4 Projects - Est. Costs
ombine 4 Projects Avail Bud~let
$83,731 I
$84,3941
05/20/2000_ 09:47 425-453-5848
JUH.19.~000 9:56RM BRIDGE $ STRUCTURES
CIVILTECH CORP
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
~"~ BRIDGE & STRUCTURE~ BRANCH
8, Fi .............................. Mtdo by ................ Chock by ............................. Date .......... ~upv ..............................
· , I
5~eel No.