The URL can be used to link to this page

LUTC PKT 02-13-2012City of Federal Way City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee February 13, 2012 City Hall 6 :00 p.m. Council Chambers MEETING AGENDA Webpage version 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes) 3. COMMITTEE BUSINESS Topic Title/Description A. Approval of Minutes: ]anuary 23, 2012 B. Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan C. Twin Lakes Commercial Area Subarea Plan D. S 344 Way @ Weyerhaeuser Way S Intersection Improvements — 85% Design Status Report E. lO Avenue SW at SW Campus Drive Intersection Improvements — 85% Design Status Report F. 21�` Avenue SW at SVII 336"' St Intersection — 30% Design Status Report 4. OTHER Presenter Page LeMaster 2 Shull/Perez 6 Action or Info Action Action Herrera 68 Action Mulkey 114 Action Mulkey 116 Action Mulkey 118 Action Council Date Time N/A 5 min. Feb. 21, 2012 15 min. Consent Feb. 21, 2012 15 min. Ordinance 1� Reading Feb. 21, 2012 5 min. Consent Feb. 21, 2012 5 min. Consent Feb. 21, 2012 5 min. Consent 5. FUTURE MEETINGS/AGENDA ITEMS: The February 20, 2102 LUTC meeting had been cancelled in observance of President's Day. The next LUTC meeting is scheduled for March 5, 2012 at 6:00 PM in City Hall Council Chambers. 6. AD]OURN Committee Members City Staff Bob Celski, Chair Cary M. Roe, P.E., Director of Parks, Public Works and Emergency Management Jeanne Burbidge, Member Dar/ene LeMaster, Administrarive Assistant II Susan Honda, Member 253-835-2701 G.• �LUTCILUTCAgendas and Summaries Z012�Z-13-2012 LUTCAgenda.doc City of Federal Way City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee January 23, 2012 City Hall 6:00 PM City Council Chambers MEETING SUMMARY Committee members in attendance: Committee Chair Bob Celski, Committee member Jeanne Burbidge and Committee rnember Susan Honda Council members in attendance: Councilmember Linda Kochmar Staff in Attendance: Director of Parks, Public Works and Emergency Management Cary Roe, Deputy Public Works Director Ken Miller, Planning Manager Isaac Conlen, Principle Planner Margaret Clark, Senior Planner Deb Barker, Senior Planner Janet Shull, Associate Planner Becky Chapin, City Traffic Engineer Rick Perez, Senior Traffic Engineer Jesse Hannahs, Assistant City Attorney Peter Beckwith, and Administrative Assistant II Darlene LeMaster. 1. CALL TO ORDER Committee Chair Celski called the meeting to order at 6:01 PM. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT There was one public comment read into the record: Letter from Marvin Hoffman, 5212 SW 318 Court — Mr. Hoffman expressed concern over the abundance of garage sales in his neighborhood and is requesting sta, fJ'to consider limiting the amount of garage sales allowed per calendar year. Chair Celski asked staff to address this concern. Planning Manager Conlen stated Mr. Hoffman's concern is a code enforcement issue based on the home occupation regulations adopted by the City. Staff will follow up with Mr. Hoffman and provide information on the code enforcement process. Code enforcement action can be furthered once a formal complaint has been made. Planning Manager Conlen also stated that no other complaints have been received to date regarding this neighborhood. Similar complaints in other neighborhoods have been received in the past and have been handled through Code Enforcement. 3. BUSINESS ITEMS Forward Topic Title/Description to Council A. Approval of the December 5, 2011 LUTC Minutes Because all LUTC committee members are new to the committee, Deputy Mayor Ferrell (former LUTC committee member) was asked to review the Dea 5, 2011 LUTC minutes for accuracy and completeness. Deputy Mayor Ferrell approved the Dea 5, 2011 minutes as accurate and complete. Committee member Burbidge was also in attendance at this meeting and confirmed the minutes to be complete and accurate. N/A Committee approved the December 5, 2011 LUTC minutes as presented. Moved: Burbidge Seconded: Honda Passed: Uuanimously, 3-0 Land Use/Transportation Committee Page 2 January 23, 2012 B. C. D. Plate Compactor Replacement Deputy Public Works Director Ken Miller presented information on this item in Surface Water Manager Appleton's absence. There was no public comment or discussion on this item. Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented. Moved: Burbidge Seconded: Honda Passed: Unanimously; 3-0 Neighborhood Traffic Safety (NTS) Program; 2009-2011 Contract Closeout Senior Traffic Engineer Jesse Hannahs presented information on this item. There was no public comment. Chair Celski asked the value of the retainage. Mr. Hannahs responded that the retainage is five percent. As no new construction is anticipated until later this spring or summer, staff is ready to close out the contract. Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented. Moved: Honda. Seconded: Burbidge Code Amendments: (1) FWRC Chapter 19.275 — Temporary Use; and (2) FWRC Chapter 12 — Businesses Senior Planner Deb Barker presented information on both items. There was no public comment. Chair Celski thanked staff and the Planning Commissioners for their work on this issue. Chair Celski asked how the City would make sure it collects the sales tax it is entitled to. Senior Planner Bazker referenced page 78 of the LUTC agenda packet, "12.05.120 Agents responsible". This section was added specifically to ensure the City's ability to collect sales taxes when appropriate. Committee Member Honda questioned where a temporary car sale would be held, if not at the Commons Mall. Senior Planner Barker stated a temporary car sale could be held in a zone that would normally permit that use, such as: BC, CE, and BN. The center core azea of the city (mall area) is not currently zoned for business activities that include auto sales. Committee Member Honda also asked if it was know how many vehicles aze sold and/or picked up in Federal Way. Senior Planner Barker explained that information is not specifically tracked. Committee Member Burbidge asked if there are salespersons present at these temporary car sales to assist interested buyers. Senior Planner Barker replied, again, that there was no way to know, but it was assumed that sales stuff would be present during a temporary car sale. (1) FWItC Chapter 19.275—Terr�porary Use Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented. Moved: Burbidge Seconded: Honda (2) FWRC Chapter 12 - Businesses Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented. Moved: Burbidg� Seconded: Handa Passed: Unanimously; 3-0 Passed: Unanimously; 3-0 Passed: Unanimously; 3-0 Feb 7, 2012 Consent Feb 7, 2012 Consent Feb 7, 2012 Ordinance lg` Reading G:\LUTC\LUTC Agendas and Summaries 2012\L23-I? Minutes.doc Land Use/Transportation Committee Page 3 January 23, 2012 E. Complete Streets Code Amendment — FWRC Chapter 19.135 — Development Feb 7, 2012 Improvements Ordinance 1 Reading City Traffic Engineer Rick Perez presented information on this item. There was no public comment. Chair Celski thanked staff for a well thought out and clear presentation. Committee Member Burbidge commented that she is pleased to see this item moving forward, also noting that there have been opportunities for public input with good participation. Chair Celski stated that the presentation clarified his prior interpretation of the topic and was easily understood. Committee Member Honda inquired as to the public input on bicycle lanes. City Traffic Engineer Perez spoke about the two public workshops held on this topic as well as public comments received. Comments from the consultant supported the public comment received. City Traffic Engineer Perez also noted that based on public comment and consultant feedback, locations for biking, walking, etc. will be designated for areas that are conducive to that activity, and where it makes sense. The goal is to get those interested in biking and walking out doing these activities in an area that they will feel comfortable walking and biking in. Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented. Moved: Barbidge Seconded: Honda Passed: Unanimously; 3-0 4. OTHER Committee Member Burbidge recognized and thanked staff for their hard work on the recent snow and ice event. Councilmember Kochmar asked staff if there is any plan or policy to prepare for those trees over the power lines in advance of future weather events. Director Roe explained that Puget Sound Energy (PSE) is very proactive with trees hanging in the power lines and makes an effort to address these trees way in advance of winter weather. This particular storm event was unique in the fact that many of the trees that came down, came down because of weight, not wind. PSE also uses tree wire (stronger wire) around areas with trees that is much stronger and can support the weight from branches/trees in some cases. Councilmember Kochmar inquired on the process for cleanup. Director Roe responded that he was in the process of developing a debris management plan. All trees in the public right of way will be cleaned up. The plan will be finalized this week and made available to the public. Councilmember Kochmar is working on any disaster recovery effort to recover the City's costs. If the City's costs meet a given threshold and if the governor declares a state of emergency, some of the City's costs may be recoverable. Staff is doing all they can to be eligible for inclusion if costs become recoverable. Committee Member Honda asked how many residents may still be without power as of that time. Director Roe estimated approximately 2,000-3,000 residents may still be without power. Committee Member Burbidge encouraged staff to consider curbside pickup of storm debris. Some residents will not be able to haul debris on their own. Councilmember Kochmar asked if fixture development will have their utilities undergrounded. Director Roe explained that undergrounding of utilities in new development is already code. 5. FUTURE MEETING There has been a reyuest to postpone the next LUTC meeting by one week in order to accommodate the agenda items and their meeting timelines. Therefore, the next LUTC meeting will be Monday, February 13, 2012 at 6:00 PM in City Hall Council Chambers. G:�LUTC\LUTC Agendas and Summaries 2012U-23-12 Minutes.doc Land Use/Transportation Committee 23, 2012 6. ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 7:07 PM. Attest: Darlene LeMaster, Administrative Assistant II COMMITTEE APPROVAL: Bob Celski, Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member G:\LUTC\LUTC Agendas and Summaries 2012\1-23-12 Minutes.doc COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 21, 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL ITEM #: AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: FEDERAL WAY BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN POLICY QUESTION Should the City Council approve the Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and direct staff to utilize the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan to update the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, Transportation Element, Non-motorized section, as part of the next annual update process? COMMITTEE Land Use Transportation Committee CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ City Council Business � Resolution STAFF REPORT BY: Senior Planner, Janet Shull, AICP MEETING DATE Feb. 13, 2012 ❑ Public Hearing ❑ Other DEPT CEDD and PW City Traffic En�ineer, _Rick Perez, PE __ ____ Background: The City of Federal Way received funding from Public Health Seattle-King County through the Communities Putting Prevention to Work (CPPV� program in the spring of 2010 to prepare a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. The proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan provides updated information on existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and analyzes opportunities to add facilities to expand the network, improve safety, and improve connectivity between neighborhoods and business centers, recreation and schools. One of the conditions of the CPPW grant is to present the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan to the City Council for action prior to the end of the grant funding cycle. � Attachments: 1) Draft Resolution with Exhibit A– Draft Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan; 2) Staff report to the Planning Commission; 3) Minutes of the February 1, 2012 Planning Commission Public Hearing. Options Considered: 1) Approve the Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan as shown in Exhibit A to the draft resolution; 2) Modify the Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and approve as modified; 3) Do not approve the Federal and Pedestrian Master Plan�__.----- ,.__...�.......�__.__._..__..__.....----.---�_._.__.�._.._._..—.-----_._.......�-----.�� MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION The Mayor recommends approval of the Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. MAYOR APPROVAL: i� DIRECTOR APPROVAL: �� o e council co" mmittee Councii COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION I move to forward the proposed resolution approving the Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan to the February 21, 2012 consent agenda for approval. Bob Celski Jeanne Burbidge Susan Honda Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION "I move approval of the Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED 1 reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances onlyJ ORDINANCE # REVISED — 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION # RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to the approval of the FEDERAL WAY BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN. WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way received a Communities Putting Prevention to Work (CPPV� grant in 2010 to fund the development of a citywide bicycle and pedestrian master plan; and WHEREAS, city staff prepared the draft Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan with consultant assistance and citizen input, including a 20-member advisory committee, over an 18- month period; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan examines the existing conditions for cycling and walking within the city, evaluates opportunities to increase walking and cycling, and proposes a connected network of cycling and walking facilities; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is intended to update the Non-motorized section of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, Transportation Element; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan update shall take place as part of the next annual comprehensive plan update pursuant to the authority granted by Chapters 36.70A and 35A.63 RCW and pursuant to chapter 19.80 FWRC; and WHEREAS, as part of the CPPW grant agreement, city staff is required to present the draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan to the City Council for consideration and recommended action; and WHEREAS, the City's Planning Commission held a public hearing on February l, 2012, at the close of which they recommended to the council approval of the Federal Way Bicycle and Resolution No. 11- Page 1 of 4 Rev 1/10 Pedestrian Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the Land Use/Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered the Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan on February 13, 2012, and recommended approval of the Planning Commission's recommendation; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to approve the Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A�proval of the Federal Way Bicvcle and Pedestrian Master Plan. The City Council hereby approves the Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan as presented in Exhibit A. Section 2. Update the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The City Council hereby directs city staff to utilize the Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan to update the Non-motorized section of the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element during the next annual update of the Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the authority granted by Chapters 36.70A and 35A.63 RCW and pursuant to chapter 19.80 FWRC. Section 3. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this�resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution. Section 4. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this resolution are authorized to make necessary corrections to this resolution including, but not limited to, the correction of Resolution No. 11- Page 2 of 4 Rev 1/10 9 scrivener/clerical errors, references, resolution numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON this 21 st day of February, 2012. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, SKIP PRIEST ATTEST: CITY CLERK, CAROL MCNEILLY, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: ResolutionNa I1- Page 3 of 4 Rev 1/10 10 DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Introduction Purpose The overall goal of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is to set the stage for the city's long-term vision of a safe, accessible, and connected bicycle and pedestrian network. Implementation of the plan will improve walking and biking conditions throughout the City of Federat Way with an emphasis on connecting neighborhoods, schools, transit, business districts, and recreational facilities. Another key objective of the plan is to increase opportunities for physical activity within the city. Currently, Federal Way has a higher percentage of residents who are overweight than the King County average. By making walking and bicycling safer and more convenient, there will be greater incentive to walk and ride bikes for health and recreation, as well as for transportation. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is a stand-alone document that will be incorporated into the Transportation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan as part of the next annual update. The Master Plan provides an updated inventory of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, analyzes the functionality of the overall non-motorized network, and identifies potential for improvements to the network that address connectivity, comfort and safety. Plan Development The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master P(an was developed over a period of approximately 18 months with funding made available through the Communities Putting Prevention to Work (CPPW) grant program. Specifically, the City of Federal Way was awarded a HEAL (Healthy Eating Active Living) grant that provided funding for stafftime to wark on the project and also provided the resources of technicat consultants, non-profit organizations, and universiTy staff researchers. HEAL grants were specifically awarded to agencies and organizations who were working on projects that ultimately will result in improved health for King County's residents. An advisory committee was established that met regularly between March and September, 2011. The advisory committee helped develop draft goals and objectives, (Section 2), and provided input on the proposed bicycle and pedestrian network facilities and prioritization criteria. In addition to the advisory committee input, an electronic survey was Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Seivices and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 12 ��}°�� ___._.._._ � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan conducted early in the plan development process to learn mare about the habits and preferences of those who are biking and walking in Federal Way. Two public workshops were conducted in June and November of 2011. The June workshop focused on gathering input on existing conditions, and the November workshop focused on the draft proposed facilities networks. The city also launched a social media website "Engage Federal Way" that provided an interactive online `Town Hall Meeting" environment where citizens could share ideas and opinions about walking and biking, as well as comment on the draft proposed bicycle and pedestrian networks. Moving Forward The master plan sets the stage for moving forward within the context of the overall Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element. It identifies strategies and resources that can be leveraged to realize the identified network improvements. Planning-level cost estimates are provided for the facility network improvements identified in the plan (Section 5). Prioritization criteria were developed that will be used to rank the identified facility network improvements as they are moved from this plan to line items in the city's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). Multi- modal level of service analysis (MMLOS) was prepared for representative roadway typologies. This analysis will help the city evaluate the relative level of improvement that might be expected from various facility modifications; for example - adding a sidewalk section or bike lane to a specific roadway segment. Overall Goals The overall goals of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan will guide the city as it moves forward with plan implementation. A summary of the goals is provided below: Bicycle and Pedestrian Network and Support Facilities — Develop a network that allows for safe and convenient movement throughout the city and to the regional network. Safety, Security, and Equity - Provide safe connections between neighborhoods, business centers, parks and recreation facilities and schools, and consider the needs of all residents, especially those who do not have access to private vehicles. Transportation and land Use — Consider adjacent land uses and their potential to generate walking and biking travel when determining where walking and cycling improvements are most needed. Education and Awareness — Open the lines of communication so that all users of the transportation network have improved awareness of the need to share the roadways and trails, and recognize and observe traffic safety laws. Maintenance and Operations — Ensure that biking and walking facilities are kept in good condition and work well for the intended users. Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 13 r,�'��' �., ...__..�_-____ _. _�� -� DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Background Why Update the Pian? The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan will update the current Non-motorized Modes section of the Transportation Element of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan during the next annual comprehensive plan update process. The Non-motorized Modes section was last revised in 2003. Since then, there have been notable shifts in Federal, State and regional transportation policy related to the importance of supporting walking and biking or "active transportation" in the transportation network. While the importance of walking and biking has always been recognized in the City's Comprehensive Plan, transportation funding decisions are placing increased emphasis on inclusion of active transportation in proposed transportation improvement projects and programs. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan sets an important foundation to continue the city's success in securing transportation project and program funding. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan establishes an overview of the current status of walking and biking facilities, including barriers and opportunities, and gauges citizen opinion about walking and biking preferences. The City of Federal Way will be commencing work on a major comprehensive plan update beginning in 2012. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan will be further refined as part of this update process. It will be incorporated into the Transportation Element with greater emphasis on prioritization of the identified network improvements, and incorporation of network improvements into short-term and long-term capital improvement plans. Federal Policy On March 11, 2010, the Federal Department of Transportation (DOT) passed the Policy Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and Recommendations. The purpose of the policy statement is "... to reflect the Department's support for the development of fully integrated active transportation networks. The establishment of well-connected walking and bicycling networks is an important component for livable communities, and their design should be a part of Federal-aid project developments." This policy not only recognizes the importance of walking and biking facilities, it encourages transportation agencies to "go beyond the minimum requirements and proactively provide facilities that foster increased use by bicyclists and pedestrians". Further, the policy includes language to the effect that the DOT Secretary can withhold approval of projects that would negatively impact bicyclists and pedestrians. The policy also specifies that state and regional transportation agencies provide documentation of how specific transportation fund expenditures include investment in pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities. Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 14 '� °'' �.�' � � _ ._ . . . _�._. �._.__ r_,. �; : DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan As many of the major transportation facility improvements in Federal Way include Federal funding, the development of an up-to-date bicycle and pedestrian master plan is an important tool for the city to position itself favorably in the competitive transportation- funding arena. Washington State Policy The Growth Management Act The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) governs most comprehensive planning activities in the state. The GMA requires that all cities and counties, withit� designated counties, develop and implement comprehensive plans. These plans are required to include two elements that are particularly relevant to bicycle and pedestrian planning; a Transportation Element and a Parks and Recreation Element. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is consistent with both of these elements and overlaps with elements of the Parks and Recreation Element — specifically with regard to existing and proposed trail networks. One key requirement of the GMA is to establish transportation levels of service (LOS) and concurrency standards. Despite the best intentions of the GMA to promote livable communities and encourage transportation alternatives, traditional LOS measures based solely on motorized traffic can often contradict these goals. An example of how this can occur is when maintaining established LOS requires the addition of vehicle lanes, leaving less right-of-way available for bicycle or pedestrian facilities. However, local jurisdictions have the ability to determine what the local LOS standards look like. This means that jurisdictions can adopt multi-modal levels of service (MMLOS) that consider modes other than just vehicular travel. Many communities planning under the GMA are implementing or considering a MMLOS approach to their transportation planning. The Washington State Department of Transportation The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) manages state transportation facilities. The WSDOT develops and implements a variety of plans ranging from statewide system plans to specific corridor plans. Any proposed bike and pedestrian facilities that use state rights-of-way need to be planned consistent with state plans. In Federal Way, Pacific Highway South (SR99), SW Dash Point Road (SR509) Highway 18 (South 348 Street), and Enchanted Parkway (SR161) are state transportation facilities. In addition to the development ofthese specific corridors, the WSDOT also administers the Federal Safe Routes to Schood program. Made possible by funding from the Department of Hea/th and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 4 15 _ i � -'- 'T� ' _ _.__ . _.___.�_,:__._� �_ DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Safe Routes to School The Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program provides technical assistance and helps fund improvements that encourage walking and biking to school with an emphasis on safety. In Washington State, the program is funded with both state and federal monies. There are three elements to the Safe Routes to School program — engineering, education, and enforcement. The City of Eederal Way coordinates with Federal Way Public Schools on applying for and implementing SRTS improvements for schools within the city limits. The proposed pedestrian network improvements (Section 4) take into consideration the Federal Way School DistricYs recommended school access routes. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan will reinforce ongoing efforts to improve conditions for walking and biking to and from school. Complete Streets Legislation In July 201 l, the Washington State Legislature passed the Complete Streets Bill (ESHB 1071). The Complete Streets Biil recognizes the importance of planning for main streets that provide safe access for all users and also protect and preserve a community's character. The bill specifies that a grant program be established to fund complete streets projects. Specific goals of the bill include: improving health by increasing walking and biking; improving safety with wider sidewalks, street trees and bicycle lanes; protecting the environment and reducing congestion by providing alternatives to single occupant vehicle driving; and preserving community character by involving citizens in the transportation improvement process. Following passage of this bill, the WSDOT is developing a proposed grant program to fund projects that meet criteria consistent with the bill. The purpose of the proposed grant program is to encourage street designs that include all users including bicyclists, pedestrians, motorists and public transit users. The grant program also places emphasis on the importance of complete streets relative to economic development, the importance of connecting housing and employment, and the importance of supporting infill development. To be eligible for the grant, a project must be located in a community that has adopted local Complete Streets legislation. As part of its CPPW grant program participation and in concert with the development of this plan, Federal Way is currently considering a local Complete Streets ordinance. Regional Policy There are two regional agencies with which the City of Federal Way coordinates: the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) and King County. Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 5 16 � � �_ _ � � ��. DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Puget Sound Regional Council The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) serves as the region's Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and Regional Transportation Planning Organization (RTPO). The PSRC has adopted VISION 2040 as the growth management, environmental, economic, and transportation vision for the central Puget Sound region. The Vision 2040 Transportation element's overarching goal is that "The region will have a safe, cleaner, integrated, sustainable, and highly efficient multimodal transportation system that supports the regional growth strategy and promotes economic and environmental vitality, and better public health." Similar to Federal and State Policy, the regional transportation policy contained in Vision 2040 emphasizes the importance of increasing travel mode choice and context-sensitive design that supports and connects regional mixed use and business centers. The regional plan calls for increased investment in facilities and programs that support bicycle and pedestrian travel. Under the GMA, the PSRC must certify that city and county transportation elements are "consistenY' with the regional plan. PSRC planning also guides the application of federal and state transportation funding for projects within the region. The PSRC also has an active Regional Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee that focuses on implementing regional bicycle pedestrian implementation strategies contained in the Transportation element of Vision 2040. King County King County adopts countywide planning policies that Federal Way's Comprehensive Plan must be consistent with. King County has also has adopted Countywide Level of Service Framework Guiding Principles that encourage King County jurisdictions to adopt a multi-modal LOS approach and specifically adopt a non-motorized component to their LOS standard. City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) defines Federal Way's strategy for managing future growth and physical development. The plan is updated consistent with the requirements of the GMA and the regional and countywide planning policies. Transportation Element The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan will update the existing non-motorized section of the Transportation Element at the time that the comprehensive plan is next updated. The proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities networks will be considered as projects in the updated Transportation Element and its component of the updated Capital Facilities program. Made possible by funding from the Departmeni of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 6 17 — ,-,��. � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Parks and Recreation Element The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is consistent with the Parks and Recreation Element and includes the updated trail planning data as part of the overall bicycle and pedestrian network. Plan implementation considers the potential to address goals of both the recreation component and transportation component to the trail system. CPPW Grant Program Communities Putting Prevention to Work (CPPW) is a national initiative to prevent chronic disease and promote health through policy, systems and environment changes. Public Health Seattle/King County was one of 55 sites throughout the United States awarded grant funding fhrough the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC). The City of Federal Way was awarded a CPPW HEAL (Healthy Eating Active Living) grant from Public Health Seattle/King County to develop a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan as part of a county-wide effort to increase physical activity in King County cities. Along with the financial resources of the grant, the city had access to consultant assistance from the team of SvR Design Company and Alta Planning + Design. The consuttant team analyzed Federal Way's existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, prepared recommended goals and objectives, a citywide bicycle and pedestrian network, prioritization criteria for selecting facility improvement priority, and planning level cost estimates of identified network improvements. In addition to the assistance of the SvR/Alta consultant team, the CPPW grant also brought to Federal Way the resources of the Cascade Bicycle Club. The Cascade Bicycle Club conducted two half-day workshops in Federal Way related to the development of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. The first workshop (January 19, 2011) was on the topic of Complete Streets. The second workshop (June 29, 2011) was on the topic of Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS). Both of these workshops addressed the specific needs of pedestrians and bicyclists for safe and convenient access to the transportation network. Complete Streets are defined as roadways that are designed for users of all ages and abilities. Complete streets consider the needs of pedestrians, bicycle riders, and transit as well as automobiles and freight. As part of the complete streets workshop, city staff, elected offtcials and citizens conducted a"walking audit" exercise to examine some existing rights-of-way and observe what was and wasn't working for pedestrians and cyclists. Multi Modal Level of Service - Related to the complete streets philosophy, is a relatively new approach to analyzing transportation level of service, (LOS), that addresses multiple modes or Multi-Modal Level of Service, (MMLOS). Traditional LOS analyses address how roadways function from the standpoint of motorized travel. Multi-Modal Level of Service analyses examine how roadways function from the standpoint of multiple users inc(uding bicycle and pedestrian travel. As part of the CPPW grant program a MMLOS Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 7 18 r � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan analysis was prepared for a representative sample of Federal Way roadways and the findings are summarized in Chapter 3"Existing Conditions and Analysis". Made possible by funding from the Department of Hea/th and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 8 19 � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan 2. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Overall goal Goal: Enhance community livability, health, and transportation by providing a connected system of pedestrian and bicycie ways that is integrated into a coordinated regional network (EXISTING TG4). Objective: • Increase the number of trips made by bdcycling and walking in Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Network and Support Facilities Goal: Develop a pedestrian and bicycle network that is accessible to all residents of Federa/ Way. Objectives: • Improve pedestrian and bicycle inff-astructure connectivity and provide more places to walk and cycle. • Build pedestrian and bicycde facilities on new roadways, and retrofat older roadways to complete the system when feasible. • Complete missing links in pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure on existing street network as a priority measure. • Improve connections to transit for pedestrians and bicyclists. • Develop a bicycle network that supports a diversity of cycling abilities and interests. • Encourage high-quality, flexible and secure bicycle parking at destinations. • Provide wayfinding tools for pedestrians and bicyclists. Safety, Security, and Equity Goal: Ensure that the pedestrian and bicycle system is safe and functional for all users. Objectives: • Improve facility safety through design, operations, maintenance and education. • Effectively enforce laws that affect bicyclist and pedestrian safery. • Conduct outreach and education to increase safety and awareness for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. • Ensure that pedestrian and bicycle facilities are accessible to everyone in the community. Made possible by funding from the Department of Hea/th and Human Se�vices and Public Healfh - Seattle & King County. 9 20 - � , � _=� _. . . �, _ :- -- _------�--�._ _ _: DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan • Apply traffic calming techniques to address safety issues associated with vehicle speeds and volumes. Transportation and Land Use Goal: Create efficient and convenient methods for pedestrians and bicyclists to travel to the p/aces where they live, shop, work, and p/ay. Objectives • Connect the pedestrfan and bicycle network to destinations such as Ciry Center, commercial and busaness districts, parks, trails, schools, and recreation sites. • Require implementation ofpedestrian and bdcycle facilities as part of required frontage improvements associated with development. • Coordinate pathway projects with parks and open space agencies. • Develop "connector trails " to link destinatdons and facilities not easily accessibde on the existing street network. • The form, density and design of new commercial and business centers should support pedestrian and bicycle trip-making. Education and Awareness Goal: Foster a community culture supportive of walking and biking as important modes of transportation and recrearion. Objectives: • Support creative local walking and biking events • Develop programs that encourage people to shift from driving to walkang and biking for short trips within the City. • Encourage walking and biking to community events. • Strengthen local walking and biking organizations. • Promote Federal Way as a walkable, bikeable, and accessible city. • Provide easily accessible information about the pedestrian and bicycle system. Made possible by funding from the Depa►tment of Hea/th and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 10 21 '° ` � � J- 7""� �_', � � , .� �� DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Maintenance and Operations Goal: Improve the bicycle and walking environment through enhanced traffic operations and maintenance Objectives: • Monitor bicycle and pedestrian facilities to ensure that safety is not being degraded over time. • Update pedestrian and bicycle facilities where appropriate to incorporate best practices. � Manage tra�c control systems to better faciditate bicycle and walking travel along strategic corridors. Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Heatth - Seattle & King County. 11 22 - r, �-= f"'� DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ANALYSIS Federal Way's Current Bicycle and Pedestrian Network The City of Federal Way incorporated in 1990. The existing built environment is largely characterized by conventional suburban style development that took place in the decades of the 1960s through 1980s prior to incorporation. The suburban development pattern features separated land uses connected by an arterial roadway network with high volume and high-speed traffic. Residential neighborhoods were developed with a predominance of curvilinear streets and cul-de-sacs and limited through-street connections. This development pattern results in cross-town trips, motorized and non-motorized, being funneled to the same high volume, high speed corridors. This lack of connectivity in the existing built roadway network is the key challenge in developing a safe and convenient network of bicycling and pedestrian facilities in Federal Way. Public Health Statistics According to King County public health data, adult residents of Federal Way are more likely to be overweight or obese than the King County average. The following are the most recent statistics on overweight http//www kin�counro eov/healthservices/partnershios/cnvw/kc�rofileas� Obesity Trends King County: 19.8% Federal Way: 28.1 % Overweight King County: 54.4% Federal Way: 63.1 % In examining health statistics related to the built environment on a national basis, there is a general correlation between the rates of overweight and obese population and the Made possible by funding from the Department of Healih and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 12 23 , �,— � ;`,. ,�,,; Example oftypical residential suburban-style development DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan degree to which that population has safe and convenient access to pedestrian and bicycle facilities. In other words, peop(e who live in areas where they can safely and conveniently walk and bike to schools, parks and retail centers tend to be less overweight than people who live in areas where they do not have safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle access and therefore make more trips in private automobiles. Improving conditions in Federal Way for biking and walking may have an overall benefit to residents' health as well as improving transportation choices, safety and mobility for citizens who do not have access to a car. EXISTING FACILITIES Existing Bicycle Facilities There are currently approximately 27 miles of bicycle facilities in Federal Way. Existing facilities consist of ihe shared use Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Trail that runs northeast to southwest through the center of the city, and a mixture of bike lanes and wide shoulders. Where bike lanes exist, they often begin and end abruptly as they have been constructed in conjunction with transportation improvements that are completed on a segment-by-segment basis as funding is available. While legally bicycles are allowed on all public rights-of-way, many if not most potential cyclists do not feel comfortable riding on high-volume, high-speed roadways. Existing Pedestrian Facilities There are currently approximately 247 miles of pedestrian facilities in Federal Way. Existing facilities consist of sidewalks, the BPA Ttrail, and recreational trails through existing park facilities. Most of the arterial roadways have sidewalk facilities. The city has code language requiring sidewalk facilities in most new developments. 'I'herefore, areas of the city where development has taken place from the 1990s to the present, have a fairly complete network of pedestrian facilities. However, pre-incorporation subdivisions have a general lack of sidewalk facilities. In general, there has been more public and private investment in pedestrian facilities than bicycle facilities in Federal Way, and the pedestrian network provides a greater level of connectivity to retail centers than the bicycle network. It should be noted however, that even with sidewalk facilities, many Federal Way residents do not find walking to retail centers a pleasant experience due to the high volume and high speeds of traffic on arterial corridors. Made possible by funding from the Depar�ment of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 13 24 � � �'� �' t "'�' � , ; , ,� DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan City of Federal Way Existing Bicycle Facilities Map Date: January, 2012 � Ciry of Federa� Way 33325 Bth Ave S Federal Way, Wa. 98003 (P)253-835-7000 (V1� www.cityoffederalway.com d8S "} � Moin�s�:�2�d S� � s �� a s �il�'/.'S!#�1/Ff� � � '� � � k, � R � � O N yS S � Federal �; Wa �i �� ,� S 304th Sl Q r x -�. .. ..�5�7 M. t e'2� ;a `�' . SW 32�th St . SW 32pth St.,, .. . .�S 3 N St �� . Kent S 288M St N . . � 9 ..� H . i Q' R u g 3241h St -'. y 0 1� � d .. North P �� '� � . .. SW Gam . . . 5.]36 f /�y c a�� ti 1f V .... . . . i � ,�. � `��. Tacoma'�, �_-______ q " ?6, a Q �<: � �; r . S 3dBthBt . iO '` �� bY �� .d . N� ' � ' '_ . � � i O � �. .. a . . §, . � . . �... ' y .. +rA C � N � Q O � � ? � ~ Q h:r IV : �§,��; . °.} �:. M�t� �. 40 o� �'� � .w . . �� 0� a �o � � ' ' .. . . .'"*`, � . O Fife urr oF Federal Way ° � Miles I � Edgewood This map is intended for use as a graphical representation. \ The City of Federal Way makes N� no warranty as to its accuracy. Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Healih - Seattle & King County. 14 25 - �� DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Clty Of Federal Way Existing Pedestrian Facilities Des Moine • • �.. , � Pr��et S�u+�J °� �� , .� a a N , � `�FF�deral �- y N � ` ,,. � �.. t � d , -�Nay _1� � � �: t r � � . ' . 5 30'4th 5t �, `* ,' '� ii ,y Q ,a 0 �, ., .__ .. --�� " <' � � .+ T . � L II ` " �� i $VVQ1Zth$t �� N.; �Q• . �-•,� -`t . � , `� a . �� . .. sWDasr y " ! � J f� .� _ r: �. ;��..,�i�.�4,- i � ;' — , .-+i*� . �`� A, Nortdsyo`QPkwy :. . � �� r , � y �.. , � "ti � Tacoma �, t `� � �� ` � � "� �. _,�,.,. � Q *,� �. �_ _ �� , ._�,� , o ; � , � � d� � � � .. � °.} *"'�.: M �r V ` �� , �a"� �k' `L � . � �a�a ��... Legend ' Paved Trails Sidewalk ,� , urr or Federal Way � Fife �..,�; �..� ,� ,� � �_ �;; � ,� � Q �4 0 0.5 1 � Miles Map Date: January, 2012 City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S Federal Way. Wa. 98003 (P)253-835-7000 (Vh www.c iry o ftederalway.com �� Kent � ,� � _:1 s teem se 1� n 'L � j � ;� j �� Y � ��. V�' I � � N �'�� ' 'n s c if f f�� lV � l � � � � rf {''�1�'' ¢'e . � ` IltOtl p Edgewood This map is intended for use as a graphical representation. � The City of Federal Way makes N no waRanty as to its accuracy. Made possib/e by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 15 26 � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Analysis of existing walking and bicycling conditions in Federal Way included the following: o Survey solicitation of Federal Way citizens' input on the experience of using existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities; o A windshield survey of the roadway network conditions; o An assessment of land use patterns and related indicators of potential for "active transportation" (walking and biking); o Coordination with Federal Way School District to provide additional pedestrian facilities along Safe Routes to School routes; o An evaluation of the available right-of-way on primary corridors to determine whether bicycle facility improvements can be accommodated; and o An analysis of the existing multi-modal level of service (MMLOS) for a sampling of Federal Way road segments and intersections. StreetPlan Analysis Consultants (Alta) used the StreetPlan analysis method to identify corridors in Federal Way with the greatest potential for striping bike lanes and buffered bike lanes. StreetPlan analysis does not evaluate other potential bikeway treatments such as shared lane markings, bicycle boulevards, or signed bike routes. Factors used in the analysis include: • Current roadway width • Raised or painted median • Number and width of travel lanes • Presence and number of turn lanes and medians • Location and utilization of on-street parking • Presence of roadway shoulder In some cases, a bike lane retrofit is simple and only requires the painting of a bike lane in readily available roadway space. 4ther corridors may be more challenging and require a tradeoffto stripe bike lanes. The analysis is useful for assessing where projects can be _ completed easily and where adding bike lanes may be more difficult. In cases where tradeoffs are necessary, for example - narrowing or eliminating a travel lane or removing existing on-street parking - more detailed engineering analysis, public outreach and traffic impact studies would be warranted. City staffworked with Alta to select the corridors to be analyzed and provided data to run the analysis. The roadways analyzed were typical(y in excess of 80-feet wide and characterized by multiple motor vehicle lanes, posted speeds of 35 miles per hour or greater, and average daily vehicle trips exceeding 8,000 vehicles per day. Riding on this Made possible by funding from the Departmeni of Hea/th and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 16 27 �. � '�,- � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan type of roadway without a dedicated bicycle facility will not be comfortable for the majority of cyclists. Options for improving user comfort along these corridors include a standard bicycle lane of 5 feet, or the greater separation from motor vehicle traffic afforded by a buffered bicycle lane. Figure 3.X Corridors Analyzed in StreetPlan Analysis Made possible by funding from the Departmeni of Health and Human Services and Public Heatth - Seattle & King County. 17 28 _ � Drak Street Plsn Matys6 Corridnrs � �� iifl. �� • 6S 1„ � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan The following minimum dimensions were used in the model and are based on existing City standards: • Travel lane width: 11-12 Feet • Right turn lane width: 11-12 Feet � Left or Center turn lane width: 11-12 Feet • Parking lane width: 7-8 Feet Potential StreetPlan Outcomes Analyis corridors were developed based on previously proposed facilities, public input, and staff input. In some instances, the StreetPlan model recommends multiple possible treatments for a given roadway segment. To determine the appropriate treatment, the model organizes its recommendations in order of the most preferred facility type. The following are the specific treatment recommendations considered: Restripe Existing Outside Lanes — In this option, enough surplus road space exists to simply add the bike lane stripes and stencils without impacting the number of lanes or configuration of the roadway. This is the easiest option to implement. Reconfigure Travel Lanes and/or Parking Lanes — In this option, bike lanes can be added by simply adjusting wide travel lanes or parking lanes within the established minimums presented above. No reduction in the number of travel lanes is needed. Implement `4 to 3' Road Diet — In this option, a reconfiguration of the existing travel lanes may be necessary. In areas with two travel lanes in either direction, it may make sense to remove two travel lanes and use this roadway width to stripe a center turn lane and two 5-foot bike lanes. This treatment may not be appropriate on roads with average daily trips (ADT) above 15,000. Add Pavement Width and Stripe Bike Lanes — In this option, it is determined that additional right-of-way may be available along the corridor. Where no curbs exist along the segment, it may be possible to pave a new roadway shoulder and stripe bike lanes. Bike Lanes Will Not Easily Fit — In this last case, the existing roadway geometry will not allow for the addition of bike lanes. Either the selection of an alternative bike route or major reconstruction of the roadway may be necessary to provide continuity in the bikeway network. Analysis Outcomes Four scenarios were analyzed as follows: l. 12-foot motor vehicle travel lanes and 5-foot bicycle lanes; 2. 12-foot motor vehicle travel lanes and 7-foot buffered bike lanes; 3. 11-foot motor vehicle travel lanes and 5-foot bicycle lanes; and 4. 11-foot motor vehicle travel lanes and 7-foot buffered bicycle lanes. Made possible 6y funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 18 29 . ._ _ �`""� DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan The analysis indicates that there are few opportunities to retrofit bicycle lanes in any of the four scenarios analyzed. However, in all scenarios some opportunities to incorporate bike lanes into the existing roadway were identified and these are summarized below: SR 509 — Sufficient undeveloped spaces exist within the SR 509 right-of-way to add additional pavement width to the shoulders. During public engagement this corridor, with connection to Dash Point State Park, was mentioned as a desirable connection. Wide shoulders already exist on portions of the corridor, which could be widened and then striped as bike lanes. 312 Street Corridor — Sufficient space exists along most of the 312�' Street corridor to retrofit bicycle lanes. This corridor was also identified through public engagement as a desirable east-west connection. Within the corridor, analysis indicates that bike lanes may be difficult to retrofit in several areas. However, visual inspection of the roadway indicates that existing roadway width is likely sufficient in the area west of 1 S ' Avenue to stripe bike lanes, though reconfiguration of the right turn pockets on the east and west legs of the intersection at l st Avenue and 312 Street may be required. The portion of roadway bisected by SR 99 will need additional analysis to determine how bicycle lanes could be retrofitted. SR 99 South of 340 Street — Sufficient space exists to retrofit bike facilities on SR 99 south of 340`" Street. This roadway was not identified as a potential bikeway corridor during public engagement, but it serves as one of the few through routes in south Federal Way. In many areas bicycles can travel on existing roadway shoulders, though narrow widths in some areas may create uncomfortable travel conditions. If shoulders are widened, this facility may become more comfortable for use by more cyclists. 356 Street Corridor — Existing 2-foot shoulders on S. 356` Street provide a small amount of room for cyclists. It may be possible to obtain additional roadway width from the two-way center turn lane, though careful consideration of intersection treatments would be necessary to ensure that an adequate level of roadway function is maintained. l Avenue S— There is potential to retrofit bike lanes on l Avenue S. This roadway was identified through public engagement as a desirable bicycling corridor. Existing shoulders could be striped and marked as bike lanes between SR 509 and 312�' Street and space could be made for bicyclists south of 312 though a traffic analysis would be necessary to determine whether roadway function would be significantly impacted. Narrowing the raised median between 330 and 344 streets would be relatively simple, although not inexpensive. Campus Drive Corridor and 320 Street — Bicycles can be accommodated within the road right-of-way via a separated, shared-use trail. This can be achieved by expanding the existing sidewalk, filling gaps, and improving crossings. It should be noted that solutions like this should not be considered as a substitute for on-street facilities and many cyclists will continue to use the roadway. However, a shared-use trail may provide travel facilities that feel safer and more comfortable for cyclists that wou(d otherwise not Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 19 30 _ � ' , -- �/'� -J 1 � � � ----�---==_ --'_-"'----. DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan bike along these roadways — even if a bike lane could be accommodated. Key considerations for a shared use trail option include: • Providing a trail that is 12-14 feet wide for shared use • Providing safe bicycle and pedestrian crossing opportunities at roadway intersections • Providing adequate separation between the roadway and trail Figure 3.X — Example of StreetPlan Analysis Results Map Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Pub/ic Health - Seattle & King County. 20 31 _ , � one w�eer� rte�,w - > >-rea � �.. �d sroa sx�. � ",�� ........._ "� � . .. ., � nn� umnc avw 7,n � •�• DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Multi-Modal Level of Services (MMLOS) Analysis Until recently, transportation engineering and planning in the United States has focused primarily on the movement of automobiles. Roadways are typically designed for and evaluated based on their performance from the perspective of automobile drivers. Level of Service (LOS) is the accepted methodology for measuring the performance of roadways. Often times the roadways with the higher level of service ratings for vehicle travel do not work well for other roadway users. For example, improving the functionality of a street to better serve bicyclists and pedestrians may result in a lower vehicle level of service. Adopting a multimodal LOS provides community benefits similar to adopting a Complete Streets policy. A Complete Streets policy recognizes the importance of considering all roadway users. Multimodal LOS provides for the analysis of the transportation network that helps communities make decisions based on how roadway configurations affect all users. Resources were available to analyze only a selection of street segments and intersections. Staff coordinated with the consultants to identify representative street segments and intersections to get a basic assessment of how typical street segments and intersections configurations found in Federal Way function for bicycles and pedestrians. Links The street segments analyzed (exclusive of intersections) are listed below: • 28th Av S from 304th to 317th • 8th Av S from 312th to 321 st • 26th Av SW from 320th to 332nd • SW 312th St from Dash Point Road (509) to lst Av S • S 312th St S from 1 st Av to 14th Av • S 320th St from 1 st Ave S to Pac Hwy • 21st Av SW from 320th to 336th All segments were analyzed in both directions, with separate calculations made for links within the segment that vary in either demand, control or geometry. Intersections The intersections analyzed include: • 312th Ave S at Pacific Hwy S • S 320th Street at 1 st Ave S • 8th Ave SW at SW 320th Street • S W 334th Street at 21 st Ave S W Methodology Link and intersection Levels of Service calculations were made separately for each mode, using Dowling Associates' Complete Streets LOS, version 3.0. The methodology is described in detail in Appendix X, "Federal Way Multimodal Level of Service Data Made possible by funding from the Department of Healih and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 21 32 � DRAFT City of Federa) Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Needs Memo." Multimodal Level of Service uses an A-F nomenclature like traditional vehicle LOS. However, the analysis is different. In Federal Way's adopted LOS, standard volume to capacity ratio is the primary factor, with free-flowing traffic being an A and severely congested being F. This approach isn't valuable for active transportation. For example a sidewalk with one person walking might receive an A, under traditional LOS approach, but the experience of that pedestrian may be anything but an "A" experience. The current approach to MMLOS is more of a quality of service approach, focusing on the traveler's perception of how well a facility operates. Factors evaluated for roadway segments include: For Pedestrians: • Outside travel lane width � Bicycle lane/shoulder width + Buffer presence (e.g. on-street parking, street trees) • Sidewalk presence and width � Volume and speed of motor vehicle traffic in outside lane • Pedestrian density For Bicyclists: • Volume and speed of traffic in outside lane • Heavy vehicle percentage • Pavement condition • Bicycle lane presence • Bicycle lane, shoulder, and outside lane widths • Number of driveways • On-street parking presence and utilization • Results Citywide summaries of pedestrian and bicycle Level of Service are described in Figures 3.X and 3.X, respectively. A detailed accounting of the link and intersection level of service findings is provided in Appendix X. It is important to note that the intersection LOS symbolized on the figures reflects the crossing with the worst level of service. The levels of service vary widely, but predictably throughout the City, where streets with high traffic volumes, higher traffic speeds and little separation score relatively poorly. Streets that score more highly typically have one or more of the following features: • lower traffic volumes, • separated facilities, or � • physical barriers distancing auto traffic from non-motorized traffic. Although the percentage of heavy vehicles was held constant throughout the analysis Made possible by funding from fhe Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 22 33 " _ f'—'� DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan area, this factor influences bicycle level of service significantly as well. Some specific observations about the methodology's application in Federal Way follow: • The pedestrian link LOS methodology is highly dependent upon separation, and therefore the lack of on-street parking in Federal Way serves to diminish pedestrian LOS. • The bicycle link LOS methodology is not sensitive to the benefit of on-street bike lanes versus shoulder lanes, when parking is limited, because the calculations assume this space is available to the bicyclist. In the situation where a de-facto shoulder bikeway exists, width and quality of pavement drive the level of service. • Street segments with meaningful separation between the motor vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians show the highest level of service on high volume streets. • Pedestrian and bicycle intersection LOS is sensitive to the number of turning movements that occur simultaneous to the green or walk interval on signalized intersections, and to the distance of the crossing. Bicyc(e LOS is additionally sensitive to lane width. Generally speaking, quality of service for both walking and bicycling modes at both links and intersections was positively correlated with separation, and inversely correlated with traffic speeds, traffic volumes, heavy vehicles, turning movements, street width, and pavement quality. Made possible by funding from the Departmenf of Healih and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 23 3 4 j� f� Pigure 3.X — Pedestrian Level of Service for Representative Corridors DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Potential for Active Transportation Active Transportation inaludes any method of travel that is human-powered, but most commonly refers to walking and bicycling. The potential for active transportation is typically measured by considering land use characteristics, density of development, and access to transit. A"heat map" was created by allocating points using the criteria: school, live, work, shop, play, equity and transit. A summary of the variables used in the analysis is shown below: School — measured by proximity to public schoo( or university Live — measured by population and age density per census block group. Density is defined by number of people in a census block group divided by the block's acreage. Points were assigned based on natural break intervals in the density data. Work — measured by employment density per census block. Density is defined by number of employees in a census block divided by the block's acreage. Points were assigned to the ranges of employment density based on natural break intervals in the data. Play — this category was divided into subcategories based on the type of data available: points of interest and areas (polygons) of interest. All features received points based on their perceived attractiveness and total acreage (polygons only). Once the features were identified and scored, concentric circles, referred to as "buffers", were drawn around each Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 24 35 _. , ; _- � Figure 3.X — Bicycle Level of Service for Representative Corridors DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan feature at increasing distances. Each distance will be assigned a value and multiplied by the feature base score. o Points, such as museums, libraries and various tourist attractions, receive a base score depending on their perceived attractiveness. o Polygons, such as parks and commercial corridors, receive a score based on total acreage. Equity — This category measured the number of households in a census block group that have a total income that is 50% of the median income or less for an average household in King County — based on 2011 HUD calculations. Transit — given that ridership data was not available, the consultants assigned a base score to the following features with buffers to multiply that score, e.g.: o Bus service, relative number of lines served by each stop o Bus stops o Transit station Table: Buffer Distance Multipliers for transit and schools Buffer Distance 1/8 mile 1/4 mile 1/3 mile 1/2 mile 1 mile Score 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 "Enhunce the downtown core, making it more pedestrian friendly - with the ability to wolk from store to store rather thon drive" (workshop participant) "I would like my neighborhood to have good occess to the BPA trail': (survey participant) Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 25 36 �_ �� DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan _ ___ _ __ _ _ . City of Active Transportation Federal Way Potential Des Moine � `�� "`;" q� � ' �' a � , �. o � y S • ��,3;_ � ��` . �� ' � ��..�'� Wa � �� ` r � � �� " �� y�� , �4 i �n ��,. �-. � �, �,' ��Iq�t2u, sE��,. � � �� ? � s � � � "�� Sri.320tFa� � SIN320th.3t <. � `�-` �Y_�� 'is , . , v�i ;.r :,, ��1�..�.*'�� Northahore Pkwy � �+ Tacoma � a ;�m � ' �."'^" t . a e '� O � .�. �� n . ... �, r �i w 3 � �o r° � � a ��. a 8 �` . . .. . �a�_�"� � N . Legend '° Active Transportation Potential � High PotenGal Fife � Low Potential ` CITY OF ��'�a `�' � �' �� :�';� , . ; � �r� , �., Federal Way ��Miles �G ` � � � � Milton 0 Edge�nrood This map is intended for use as a graphical representation. � The City of Federal Way makes N no warranry as to its accuracy. Map Date: January, 2012 Ciry of Federal Way 33325 Bth Ave S Federal Way, Wa. 88003 (P1253-8357000 (\M www.cityofFaderalway.com ; Kent s xaeen,si . a� Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 26 37 � �� Y} �� > �",� � � � �� , s t s+!� � c8�1� N DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan The areas shown on the map on the previous page with the deepest and warmest color have the greatest potential for generating active transportation, while the areas with the deepest and coolest colors have the least potential. This map is useful in determining where investments in bicycling and pedestrian facilities will likely result in the greatest increase in active transportation in Federal Way. Areas that have the greatest potential for active transportation include the City Center and the Twin Lakes Commercial District Subarea and their surrounding areas. Additionally, investment in bicycle and pedestrian facilities in these areas can support economic development by making these areas more attractive to pedestrians and bicyclists and complementary to mixed use infill development. Public Input and Preferences Electronic Survey Early in the plan development process, an electronic survey was posted via the city website that asked Federal Way citizens to provide input on their walking and biking habits and preferences. This information was considered in the development of the proposed bicycle and pedestrian facility networks and also informed the development of goals and objectives. The following is a summary of some of the survey results. Distance of biking and walking trips: When trips are under one mile, Federal Way residents are much more likely to walk. Over 50 percent of survey respondents said they choose to walk if a trip is less than one mile, where the number goes down to about 5% if the trip is greater than one mile. People are more apt to bike than walk if a trip is between one and five miles. About 25 percent of respondents said they would elect to ride a bike for this length of trip, but when trips were less than one mile they would only choose to bike 25 percent of the time. However, once trips exceed one mile, most citizens will get in their car. How often do people typically walk or bike: People who walk in Federal Way in general will do so more frequently than those who bike. Only about 2% of respondents said they "never" walk, while 15% indicated they "never" ride a bike. Walkers were pretty evenly split between daily (25%), few times a week (30%), and few times a month (30%). Those who rode bikes were most apt to ride them a few times a week (25%), few times a month (20%) or few times a year (22%). Purpose of biking and walking: When asked why they walk and bike, most respondents indicated they did it for exercise (80% of walkers and 75% of cyclists). For walkers, the second highest response was for shopping or errands (35%). For cyclists, the second highest response was to get to work (35%). Ten percent of walkers said one reason they chose to walk was that it was cheaper than driving, while over 20% of cyclists said they chose their bike for this reason. Impediments to biking and walking: Staff was curious to know if there were conditions or issues that kept people from walking and biking more often. For cyclists, the most Made possible by funding from the Department of Hea/th and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 27 38 _ � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan selected condition was "lack of bike lanes" (over 60%) followed closely by "lack of bike paths", "lack of bike routes", "vehicle volume and speed", "behavior of motorists", and "safety concerns" (each around 50%). For pedestrians, the number one detractor was "routes are unpleasant" (50%), followed by "lack of sidewalks" and "sidewalks in poor condition" (43% each), and "crossings feel unsafe" and "weather" (35% each). In general, it seems that lack of facilities and/or their condition are the primary detractors for people walking and biking more. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee A Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee was formed to assist staff and the consultant team with the development of draft goals and objectives, draft bicycle and pedestrian networks, and criteria to be used to prioritize projects represented by the proposed networks. The Committee consisted of 20 members with representatives from the City Council, Planning Commission, Federal Way Bicycle Patrol, School District, social service agencies, a local bicycle shop owner and interested citizens. The committee met 6 times during the plan development period. All meetings were open to the public and were often attended by additional interested citizens. Public Workshop on Biking and Walking Preferences In June 2011, two public workshops were held where attendees were encouraged to share preferences on where and how they would like to walk and bike in Federal Way. The workshop included the opportunity to participate in hands-on exercise where people drew on maps their preferred routes for walking and biking. Made possible by funding from the Department of Hea/th and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 28 39 � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan C� �+n sit� � A11 6t�.. in�- -b d�t, :�..'�, +n , _ ___ --- �',iBicyciing Facilities and Services in Federal i ---- � ______. — il .n.�.a��e�ia.,�� tbd�isanc«wltm; ;�c ��-" _ ' i �,,.■� v<<4�;�,a�+�r�a��tS :.�'axu ew.C�a. ;Qa '� � � f j.� � ; I �'g�`t YUA��,ttS LUJOl451U . 4 � ,A J � ': pF� 4C��'�Y�.n/t G'�(.l; �. �cS .�"" "'^T ) tAinq' �a�+ t�A'� p� .: �M1�Mr�� '�j� �to �:,Wa"F�) ��` W� C�.'�£d'. � 4t3� �(N1l, IS M�� ,(�!rQ' � 't s�� `. ,t,�� • �a,r, P�r�;et Soimd �' `� ^""� w �� ' U•r 1 �,.p F,4�;�,�� i. �� 3 � 3�'.aes ,�,,�„�� ` � ' ��, o � s t � C� �: ;� 1 he5 Jtv�� c�f�' w �4. �i � � „ . �� , � ."�6 ��k;. ��„ m �;1 �,�� K � s _ ,., -,.�.. �,a �.� �.: � .� , , �f ,� - ;a L x�,.'"� � ,�, :: r -� „ ; ,, t .ds�a ��;� � �-.� `� ., •' ; � r � � „ � :-- , �zk. � ; � �, , , ,,..�� . �« ,�.—, ,. ;. � `�� ';..: ,�+_�..r-�u t� 3 • -4i �l'� �d'�IE � M., w � � . b ' f f .. f �° � } �� •: 1y, ,��, � � ,�(CY^QO�,�G--, .t ti � t .'� � F t '�+ . � x �i! ,,' 'y�. . v •' � . 'I l ' _ ' �� s `.` , �:.. � 1, - ,. ,. `c,�� ;�i .'f 1 tl •'� 41 ��-.� �. ��a�. ( ; r.� _�.� uwm. . � - wt r � ,- k,. y ' "=�l�' t h t li I �. ` � y (p � � t L � ` � ",,, � ='�'.'�� , � ' � ln� � . t � �" . �- 2 tY$ _-. � ` �.Z��. _ ` �r �,- � �4 ^ M ��C �A . � . r ( : , . � w R �, ,� � '�� gt� w � �,�,��. � � � � � i S at r u�.._.� Y � ka... 4..t j � '- 7 :��!n � i .� � "` s cc -� ��'i , '-^ \ 1 i ""r q ✓ '�`� � . � II �• � � _ � ( � � � g ' . �, *.._ ,..� �� F F i s ' `�" .�..., �� `. ` . '�� J` �+ f y �.�+, � �..... 6�— ! +„�.... � �•� � � . :t-..,. �. i. i.t � . � 6w' �•, �� '` � .�: :.` � „ .- ��,.... ��/�� . . }� i E `,✓ 4 <' '� � — �'? �<_ � �.�/ ,� .! �T ' . , , , , i _ l � , ' : __ _ _ ��..,_� v.-- scw p 0 0.23 9 5 1 �� q' ' I : ��,M4A.A:5 I x�,.. � � eat� 4 c _ � N,w�' t _ Yaa �� .c -.�.�rl � ��i } q�� way � �� .�=� ' y�,� � .� '-'3,� 6� �.�„ • �'r.� �� "i} � s �� 0. • v„« � �.' _�..�. 1,�i �)� �� •� .: . ".�`� 0 '" = i � i � `� 4 �,S k^'�,. � � �. : ��. , e i 9 ,.�. ::... � � 3 I ��" � ' � �j,; 5 1 _:i �� Y• �: . ,t i �: s.' �.. �� . p� � r',G� � �.+� - ,.�'� � ,�,y� =i R _�,,, �'�,, +. t -.��`« K . � � �. �x )i.. � .� � a �� i � . ; 7 t � � �. :' J 1: (� . I ..��:K!' s'� � � ''' '�i s ?�! i .t� rMw� t�� i s •► ` -- i a .0 �'�t�, �.�, � .! � t ;, t' � l Ne.e., v �j i i! ... fi ! �' . � ,�.�� . r �� r�5 .,� — � �I � ,� i: l. •......� . _r�.; '�. i i •...�..� �. � �''� i_;c« i I i '`.^.:.�.. i 1 -y ,..� � `� AuMvn I �itsd 1 vWva ��' _: F, � I C�WldtftS yyAr . c { ', � e i�/ � �... � R.._ I jybf"�11'q+l �� .A �� ,�. � , L,i . _ � . 1i�;� • s.l � C, . � .. . ! _.� P . � ,�Iuf�2�lNS1: �.: Peddmm'� _ � / �- � r,� �s�iet�l4 . � 7 , a. - ,i(aze�sLef � �� , ,_. a � i �� ' l' ' _ ^i �� ; � . t. + ! � i i.ni � �� i_., � � , ... i*.�s+�9i- �. l"� �f'� ' � , �. `°°°� {-Mt t4' ; ; l � �, :�y„n,��Y.�'wve� i�..r i i ri 7 ` ;� �'� � �a �'. � 1 �'"' x r! �+ ynHPt.f"{�JjQ. � \. 1 ✓ � . � � f �4rai t t.'rac.y� :. '� � r � � 1, �• i --i 7 ..�. 4 c d a� �, 7 ii , „t .i� l��`n6°�'"" . I I,n.s_ �� . �` � �'' .13�� 4�a�� , I � i � -�� :�'K ' �^rti.1.. c.+.+.� i , .• �n�.,�. r � �,� ��k �+so,* " � y I '�.4" � � i '9 n�� ,,�c,M .. _ _--� _ _ . � p ; ��"�`�x � ,� __ - � ff�Erd� � I � Y q S. __. _ ___ .._._ _.._ __. _.._. 'ti1w1.� Q'�4.� t zea�re. __. _.. 1 _j� .. . L cd✓'� Composite Map of Citizen input on Preferred Bicycling and Walking Routes Made possib/e by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Healih - Seattle & King County. 29 40 � ,� - - ,�J�� i;�i : DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Public Workshop on Proposed Biking and Walking Facilities In October, 2011, a public workshop was held to solicit input on proposed bicycle and pedestrian networks and recommended facility types. In general, citizens were supportive of the proposed networks and liked the variety of facility types proposed. Some citizens expressed concern that the network improvements may be difficult to implement with limited capital resources. The importance of prioritization criteria was discussed with workshop participants as the proposed networks are a long-term vision and improvements represented in the proposed facility networks will be implemented incrementally over the long term. "If there were more bike trails that were longer in Federal Way PJ7y fut�7%/y wou/d r'ide the/77" (survey participant) Engage Federal Way Electronic Town Hall During the summer of 2011, the City of Federal Way launched a social media website "Engage Federal Way". The website functioned like a virtual town hall meeting where participants could log in from their personal computers and share opinions and ideas about walking and biking in Federal Way. The proposed facility network maps were uploaded to the website and additional comments were received. One distinct advantage of the Engage Federal Way site was that participants could comment on each other's ideas and create a dialogue. Over 1,300 people visited the site while it was activated. � � :_ - _ _ =- EN�ACE Federai Way �� ro�R corr, �ou� roE,as. * # EngageFederalWay.com 1r # �� «,�� „�,��, �,�� n,e c,ry of F�� w� w��yc�. Made possible by funding from the Department of Hea/th and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 30 41 - - ; �( 7�'� DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan 4. PROPOSED FACILITY NETWORKS Federal Way's Proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Networks The proposed bicycle and pedestrian networks were developed based upon a number of information sources. The existing bicycle and pedestrian facility maps contained in the Non-motorized section of the Transportation Element were the starting point. Federal Way citizen and Advisory Committee member input was obtained to gauge general preference for specific routes and facility types. Then the technical analysis was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of adding new facilities to the identified network. The results are two facility maps, one for bicycle, and one for pedestrian facilities. Overall, approximately 66 miles of new bicycle facilities are proposed and 72 miles of new pedestrian facilities. The maps are coded to identify the different types of facilities of which each network is comprised. Photos and drawings that illustrate each of the facility types are also provided in this section. Future Improvements: Bicycle Facilities The proposed bicycle facilities consist of a variety of facility types that are dependent on the existing configuration and function of the city's roadways. Where possible, bike lanes are proposed, but these popular solutions are limited in Federal Way where there are few cross-town connections and lots of competition for pavement width with virtually all motor vehicle traffic being necessarily funneled into these few corridors. The proposed bicycle network includes some creative solutions to achieving an overall connected network. Two new-to-Federal Way facility types proposed in this plan are the `Bike Boulevard" and "Enhanced Shared Sidewalk". The bike boulevard concept is gaining interest in cities throughout the United States and has been used to great success in cities like Portland, OR; Berkeley, CA; and Tucson, AZ. Bike boulevards are essentially designated low-volume (usually residential) streets that have been identified and optimized for bicycle travel. Bike boulevards can work well for riders of all skill levels and particularly for young riders. The implementation of bike boulevards can often be done with relatively little expense through signage and pavement markings. Enhanced shared sidewalks are proposed for two primary east-west corridors, the 320`" Street, and Campus Drive/348�' Street corridors. These corridors serve the city's largest commercial retail centers and are surrounded by higher density residential neighborhoods. The challenge for both corridors is high speed and high volume vehicle traffic. The proposed solution is the development of enhanced shared sidewalks, where sidewalks are widened and separated from vehicle traffic for use by both bicycles and pedestrians. This approach is a bit of a compromise as bicyclists and pedestrians sharing sidewalks can be tricky. Additionally, the facility must be designed with attention to vehicle crossings as they can pose a particular hazard to bicyclists. Made possible by funding from the DepaRment of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seatt/e & King County. 31 42 _�� . - J� ��—� DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan It should be noted that in developing the proposed bicycle facility network there are two key north-south corridors that do not have designated bicycle facility improvements. Those two corridors are the Pacific Highway (SR99), and 21 S Avenue corridors. Both of these corridors were identified by citizens as desirable routes for bicycle facilities. Unfortunately, when these corridors were analyzed it became evident that there was not enough available right-of-way to accommodate bicycle facilities. In addition to the existing roadway geometry, both corridors carry high-volume, high-speed traffic. Major reconstruction of these corridors would be necessary to potentially accommodate bicycle facilities and this likelihood is well beyond the planning horizon of this plan. The proposed bicycle nerivork identifies routes to the east and west of these corridors through residential neighborhoods that should provide opportunity for connectivity with safer, more accessible riding conditions as a tradeoff for more direct routing. Future Improvements: Pedestrian Facilities Pedestrian facilities proposed are largely new sidewalk sections. The location of the proposed new sidewalk sections was largely influenced by information the Federal Way School District maintains on recommended walking routes to elementary schools. During citizen engagement, many people commented on the desire to have more sidewalks in their neighborhood specifically related to access to neighborhood schools. Establishing safe and convenient walking routes enables more children to walk to school which improves student health and potentially saves the School District transportation costs where bus routes can sometimes be reduced when safety deficiencies are corrected. A more complete pedestrian network also can support Federal Way's business centers. With better sidewalk connection, residents who live close to business centers may choose to make more trips by foot. Once a person gets in a car, it is easier to decide to drive far away for that cup of coffee or small errand. Making it easier and more pleasant to walk encourages more localized shopping decisions in a community and supports economic development. Made possible by funding from the Department of Hea/th and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 32 43 � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Map Date: January, 2012 City of °'�°`�°°�`�'"�Y 33325 Bth Ave S Federal Wa Planned Bicycle Facilities ;P �g.gw3a�yjpWapp98003 Y (Vh www.cityol�ederalway.com Des Kent Moine • ° � 2nd St �� .. . � i m s �, �1�t �Nlti� .� 4 � � � •� R� w 9 y Y . � � - � $ x88�1.$� � dera� � �a y � � � ': :� Q °' .�° y D sw 3�z st e��' �' � Swa�r ' s ��m st � � � . ti H.: � , . . . : .. . 24t t � ; � .4f i p u � �Z� . Northah �� ' . � . . ��ePkWy . � ,° , �":,�. � . r . ��..,r y 2}: . > . � r� � ; .� Tacoma �- `__ �..� ► � > ;. � m = t * � „ � .� o_ ' � _,.,sw 3ssm s� ;�` .. . . W . . .. ,�r 2 � y � �� 1 � ^`� q „ < Legend `` � �� _� � Q `p . y}.`" 71 N M � Planned Bicycle Facility '*� �'°y,K � ` f� Paved Trail �,, Q 4 �' � &ke Lane w� � �. Bike Boulevard � � „�� Milton Shared lane Markings 0 Flf@ � 0 Enhanced Shared Sidewalk _� , ' cirr oF This map is intended for use 0 0.5 1 as a graphical representation. � ;:� Federal Way � Miles me City of Federal Way makes N i . . 5 no warranty as to its accuracy. Made possible by funding from the Departmenf of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King Counry. 33 ' —, ,� 44 ��j-'��!l�'r_'_' � � — DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan . .�__�_ ------ Mep o�e: �az,�ry, Zo�x C' }" O � Ciry ot Federel Way �y 33325 81h Ave S Federal Way p Faderal Way. Wa.9B003 Pro osed Pedestrian Facilities (P)253-8357000 (VV) www.cilyolfederahvay.com Des ; ` Moines� � 272nd St � S� y Cy y, ., r o '� � p �� /Y yq 6 ^ • �8°�. � � � � . . . � � �o, . � . � as o a o °6 o .. .�r. .. . � y a� � � a Federal j ,.� � � YY�y �. . . . . ' � �"'' . �. o �� O �.S304thSt . y.: y 'i' �„� 1 � '� Q'� SW312l�S1 �g312thSK �. P � � SWDag� / sw �, s� sw amm sc l" y s jzoin sc �' e ti N r P� �..: .. . d' ..�� . ,t? . . � : p a � � 3 Juth St � � h � �� North+yQra PByy. . . � � � � . . ca mq ` � s 73&h st; .. . � .. ,a�� . . . � I, . ... . .. N . . Kent 288th S1 . . . 1�� H �� Tacoma �, Q ,;,. � � ` , ¢ : eyw,Y�,,,r,. ° L - � . N $3 . h $I� �°.., x 4T . n. � .. �� O � � � .. .. � . � � � . . � . SW 356th St . ,-, �t � 3 � �� q M . � °.� �*. � �� .. . o� ��. 'k •k, y . dc .� �°�� ° � a R V �°' � � Legend �� Proposed Trail 4 Fif@ � � h; � N � v : �� 4 a Q� � y �� .: � �� . ^ . . Gif � r� � � � �� b � Milton � 4 Edgewaod urr oF Federal Way ��Miles This map is intended for use as a graphical representation. The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy. a Made possible by funding from [he Department of Hea/th and Human Services and Public Healih - Seatt/e & King County. 34 45 ' i �' � �..,�� 1��; I DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Proposed Facility Types There are eight (8) different proposed pedestrian and bicycle facility types in this plan. Seven of the proposed facility types are indicated on the plan maps. The eighth, "Accessway" is not shown on the maps as this type of shared use facility is typically incorporated as part of a private land use development or through a cooperative rieighborhood agreement for use of private property. When presented to citizens during public workshops, greatest preference was indicated for the shared use facilities, and designated bicycle lanes. Less preference was indicated for the shared lane markings and bicycle boulevards. It would seem that Federal Way citizens would prefer facilities separate from vehicles or else clearly designated pavement area exclusively for bikes. However, since there are limited opportunities for designated bicycle lanes and separate shared use facilities, bicycle boulevards will likely prove to be a key element of a complete network in Federal Way. Bicycle boulevards are also not currently utilized in Federal Way, so citizens may be less familiar with and therefore indicated less preference for this facility type. � "I ride under almost Qny conditions, but there ore plenty of places in Federal Woy where I think less advonced riders would be reluctont. " (workshop participant) Examples of Proposed Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Bike Boulevard Low-volume and low-speed (typically residential) streets that have been optimized for bicycle travel. Bicycie Boulevard treatments can be applied at several different intensities. Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 35 46 _- � _ -, �`'' ._J ��.." "�' � � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan �. �.�� Shared Use Path/Trail Shared-use paths can provide a desirable facility, particularly for novice riders, recreational trips, and cyclists of all skill levels preferring separation from traffic. Shared-use paths should generally provide new travel opportunities. Shared Lane Marking Also called "sharrows," shared lane markings are pavement markings used to indicate shared space for bicyclists and motorists on low volume streets that don't have room for bike lanes. �� S'�� S'M� Wide Shouider Typically found in less-dense areas, shoulder zones are paved roadways with striped shoulders wide enough for pedestrian and bicycle travel. Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Healih - Seattle & King County. 36 4 7 �.�; �. � ..� � , !� I ---__ n � l'� DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Bike Lane Marked space along a length of roadway designated with paint for the exclusive use by bicyclists. If there is space available, some bike lanes can be buffered with a wider (a minimum 2ft) pavement marking. �'M�r � Enhanced Shared Sidewaik Shared bicycle and pedestrian facility adjacent to, but separated from, the roadway. Designed to function similar to a shared use path. Sidewalk Infill/Repair Completing sidewalk gaps greatly improves pedestrian connectivity by providing a continuous, barrier- free walkway easily accessible for all users. provide direct routes between residential areas, retail and office areas Made possible by funding from the Department of Heatth and Human Services and Public Health - Seatt/e & King Counry. 37 48 -----� - - � ACCessway Simple connectors DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan 5. MOVING FORWARD - NEXT STEPS Implementing the Proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Network The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan establishes an overall vision for a connected network of bicycle and pedestrian facilities throughout Federal Way. The resources necessary to implement this vision are well beyond what is immediate(y available to the city. Therefore, moving forward with development of the network will require further review and possibly some difficult decisions in establishing priorities for the near term. This chapter contains information and analysis tools that will be utilized in the Comprehensive Plan, Transportation Element update to commence in 2012. One of the key outcomes of this update process will be an updated Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The updated TIP will take into consideration the identified bicycle and pedestrian facility improvement recommendations in this plan and evaluate them within the context of overall transportation facility improvement needs and goals. Planning Level Cost Estimates Consultants (SvR) prepared planning level cost estimates for the bicycle and pedestrian facilities proposed in this plan. Planning level cost estimates are general in nature and are useful for determining the relative scale of investment that will be necessary to implement all of the identified facilities. The planning level cost estimates do not take into consideration all the unique physical characteristics of each roadway segment. The planning (evel cost estimates also do not account for possible economies of scale that may be achieved by combining a bicycle or pedestrian improvement with another required improvement - for example a roadway reconfiguration related to a development proposal or utility improvement. The following 2011 planning level estimate of probable costs was developed: • Planning Level Cost Estimate for Sidewalk Network • Planning Level Cost Estimate for Proposed Trails • Planning Level Cost Estimate for Bicycle Network • Planning Level Cost Estimate for Pedestrian and Bicycle Crossing Improvements GIS shapefiles developed for the proposed bicycle and pedestrian network maps were used to identify the length and location of the improvements. Unit costs were applied per linear foot (LF) of the corridor to be improved and per each for intersection signal improvements. A 30% design contingency was applied to each unit cost. Additionally, if a project was located within 50 feet of a wetland area (as identified by GIS) an additional 25% contingency was added to account for increased costs for potential permitting and mitigation required for work in or near a sensitive area. Please note that the cost estimates do not include soft costs or costs for rights-of-way (ROW) acquisition or easements. Project segment costs shown in Appendix X have been rounded to the nearest thousand dollars. Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Se�vices and Public Healih - Seattle & King County. 38 49 _ � -__ _ -- - ---�..�...__; DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan 2011 Planning Level Cost Estimates Summary Sidewalk Network: Trail Network: Bicycle Network: Crossing Modifications: $62 Million for facilities on 61 miles roadway (approx 320,000 linear feet) $21 Million for facilities on 16 miles (87,000 linear feet) $57 Million for facilities on 71 miles of roadway (374,000 linear feet) $4 Million for modifications at 21 intersections along 320 and 348� Drive Please see Figure 5.1, "Proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Map" on the following page for locations of the proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Made possible by funding from the Department of Hea/th and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 39 50 � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan This map is not to scale. Made possible by funding from the Deparlment of Hea/th and Human Services and Public Health - Seafile & King County. 40 51 �:;, ; -- � Figure 1. City of Federal Way - Proposed Bicycte and Pedestrian Facilities DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Prioritization Criteria As can be seen in the previous section, the total estimated cost of all identified network improvements is great. It would be unrealistic to expect that all of the improvements will be implemented in the near term. Therefore, it is important to establish a strategy for moving forward. How will we determine which projects to address in the near term? What if there are multiple projects that might meet grant funding criteria, but only one can be funded? How do we choose? To assist city staff, elected officials, and citizens in making potentially difficult near-term decisions, our consultant team of SvR and Alta proposed the development of ptioritization criteria specific to bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The following tables show the recommended prioritization criteria. These criteria have a lot in common with the "Potential for Active Transportation" map shown in Section 3. In implementing the prioritization criteria, the city can elect to weight certain criteria more heavily than others. These criteria will be applied to the proposed network facilities as part of the Transportation Element and TIP update. The "Priority Route" selection criteria shown on the following page would be applied to both pedestrian and bicycle facilities to assist in determining the routes with the most need and/or potential benefit of facility improvement. On the following pages are criteria proposed to analyze pedestrian and bicycle routes specifically for their comparative benefit/need for improvement. Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 41 52 —��?_ _ -- � .= �.� ..�; . DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Priority Route Selection Criteria Suitable for bicycling/ walking without improvements Closes critical gap Provides/enhances Safe Route to School connection Serves immediate safety need Serves key origins and destinations Geographic Distribution Right- of-Way Available and/or suitable Interface with other transportation modes Speed limit and ADT Gonnection to existing pedestrian or bicycle facility Proximity to schools High exposure to freight and transit, poor record of crashes Proximity to origins and destinations Provides connection where few exist and/or in area with known income or health disparities Public ownership and width Proximity to transit stops/stations Made possible by funding from the Department of Hea/th and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 42 53 _; �. ::_, - � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Example Pedestrian Prioritization Criteria . . . Proximity to Grocery Land use integration; synergy with Safe Stores Alta (from City GIS data) Routes to School; integration with food access Proximity to Parks �klta (from City GIS data) Proximity to Schools Alta (from City GIS data) Proximity to public q�ta (from City GIS data) facilities Number of Users Alta (from Census and City GIS (Employment Density) data) Number of Users (Population Density) Alta (from Census and City GIS data) Proximity to Transit Alta (from City GIS data) Gap Identified in Existing Alta (Gaps Analysis) Conditions Connection to Existing Shared-Use Path Alta (GIS/manual review) Collision locations Land use integration; synergy with Safe Routes to School work; integration with parks & open spaces investments Land use integration; synergy with Safe Routes to School work Examples: City Hall, Community Center, Libraries. Land use integration, focus on facilities that generate high use Increase mode share by serving more residents (cost-benefit) Increase mode share by serving more residents (cost-benefit) Nexus with multimodal transportation Fill in existing gaps; create safer and more usable network; remove barriers to use Fill in existing gaps; create safer and more usable network; remove barriers to use �IS review of city compiled data Improves safety Community Input City Respond to community needs and concerns Feasibility City Prioritize projects based on environmental, political, and design feasibility. Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seatt/e & King County. 43 54 _ � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Example Bicycle Prioritization Criteria . . . Proximity to Grocery Land use integration; synergy with Safe Stores Alta (from City GIS data) Routes to School; integration with food access Proximity to Parks Proximity to Schools Proximity to Public Facilities Proximity to Transit Alta (from City GIS data) Alta (from City GIS data) Alta (from City GIS data) Alta (from City GIS data) Land use integration; synergy with 8afe Routes to School work; integration with parks & open spaces investments Land use integration; synergy with Safe Routes to School work Examples: City Hall, Community Center, Libraries. Land use integration, focus on facilities that generate high use Nexus with multimodal transportation Number of Users Alta (from Census and City GIS Increase mode share by serving more (Employment Density) data) residents (cost-benefit) Number of Users Alta (from Census and City GIS Increase mode share by serving more (Population Density) data) residents (cost-benefit) Alta (coded by facility type - Increase mode share by attracting new users, Range of User Types assumes detailed network gives extra points for separated family development) friendly facilities Gap Identified in Existing Conditions Alta (Gaps Analysis) Connection to Existing Shared-Use Path Collison locations Community Input Feasibility Alta (GIS/manual review) Fill in existing gaps; create safer and more usable network; remove barriers to use Fill in existing gaps; create safer and more usable network; remove barriers to use GIS review of city compiled data Improves safety City City Respond to community needs and concerns Prioritize projects based on environmental, political, and design feasibility. Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 44 55 -. - -- - � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan It is important to recognize that in applying the prioritization criteria, there may be projects that could jump to the head of the line for implementation where circumstances warrant. For example, sometimes there are associated improvements to a roadway segment that result in an immediate opportunity to implement a bicycle or pedestrian improvement that must be acted on. There may also be unforeseen funding opportunities for a specific project that was not ranked high priority. These opportunities should not be turned away simply due to the application of prioritization criteria. The real benefit of applying the criteria is in ranking similar projects that all are competing for limited capital resources. Potential Funding Mechanisms The City of Federal Way's transportation funding needs for pedestrian and bicycle facilities can be met through a variety of funding mechanisms at the local, state and federal tevels. Existing City of Federal Way Funding Mechanisms Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) - The City of Federal Way Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a list of projects considered for a six-year period. Updated and adopted by the City Council and submitted to the state each year, as required by law, the TIP includes both projects for which money has been allocated and are likely to be constructed within the six-year period, as well as unfunded projects that may not be constructed within the plan period. The TIP serves as a draft work plan for the development of local transportation systems. It represents an important planning component under the state's Growth Management Act. In most instances, projects must be included in the city's TIl' to be eligible for state and federal grants funding. Information about the current TIP can be found on the City of Federal Way website at: http://www.citvoffederalwav.com/index.aspx?n id=180 Traffic Impact Fees - Effective July 1, 2010, the City of Federal Way assesses a set fee on new development as part of a Traffic Impact Fee Program (TIF) (Ordinance 09-627). Traffic impact fees are designed to pay for capital improvements that are needed to serve new development. Traffic impact fees are collected to improve the transportation system to accommodate the higher travel demand created by new development within the City limits of Federal Way. This fee has replaced the existing SEPA pro-rata system. The Revised Code of Washington (RCW 82.02.050) defines traffic impact fee programs as intended to: ensure that adequate facilities are available to serve new growth; establish standards by which new growth and development pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve new growth and development; and ensure that impact fees are imposed through established procedures and criteria so that specific developments do not pay arbitrary fees or duplicative fees for the same impact. Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 45 56 i �. _ � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Transportation Improvement Board - The Washington State Legislature created the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) to foster state investment in quality local transportation projects. TIB is an independent state agency that distributes and manages street construction and maintenance grants to 320 cities and urban counties throughout Washington State. The funding for TIB's grant programs come from revenue generated by three cents of the statewide gas tax. Federal Way has been very successfui in receiving TIB grants in the past. Potential New Funding Mechanisms In addition to the City's possible funding mechanisms, State, non-profit and federal partners have a number of potential funding opportunities that may be used by the City of Federal Way to leverage other investments and make resources go further. These programs include such diverse sources as State and federal Safe Routes to School programs, federal Community Action Grants, and REI Bicycle Friendly Communities Grants. It should be noted that, typically, these grants are restricted to arterial streets. Additionally, since the right-of-way also serves as a critical component of a city's stormwater management and conveyance infrastructure, utility grant programs also offer a cost offsetting opportunity. For example, the Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater Grants can be used to implement low impact development features which can include streetside planting in bioretention areas and porous pavement applications for sidewalks On August 21, 2007, the voters of King County approved Proposition 2, the Parks Expansion Levy, a new $0.05, six-year, inflation-adjusted property tax lid lift to expand park and recreation opportunities. One cent of the five-cent levy proceeds is to be distributed to cities in King County for specific purposes. The city may be able to use a portion of these funds for park-related trail construction. Proposed Measurement Tools Measurement tools were proposed by our consultant team in conjunction with the development of draft Goals and Objectives (Section 2). For each goal, measurement tools are identified that the city can utilize to measure progress against the goals and objectives as well as the identified facility improvements. Measurement tools are valuable for both accountability and noting achievements along the way to plan implementation. Some of the following measurement tools will be fairly easy for the city to implement. Examples of these are data gathering on physical conditions that the city already maintains. Some will be more difficult. Of the recommended measurement tools, those listed under "Education" are the most difficult given limited staff resources. However, this category is important to citizens of Federal Way, as the need for education about Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 46 _, , _ __. 57 =�__..�� —_ � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan safety and sharing the roadways came up repeatedly in survey, public workshop, and advisory committee discussions. Overall Goal Measured by: • Increased mode share • Increased numbers in pedestrian and/or bicycle counts Network Facilities Development Measured by: • Total percentage of roadways that have designated pedestrian facilities. • Total number of miles of bike network designed using best practices that include bike lanes, off street paths, and family friendly bike ways on low traffic volume streets. • Total miles of off street trails and paths. • Total number of businesses, schools, public buildings, and parks that have bicycle parking. Safety, Security and Equity Measured by: . • Reduction in the number and severity of reported crashes. • Perception of safety among residents and system users. • Percentage of accessible intersections with ADA compliant facilities. Transportation and Land Use Measured by: • Percentage of intersections with curb ramps and completed sidewalks within a half-mile of transit centers, schools, parks and downtown. • Percentage of roadways with bikeways within one mile of transit centers, schools, parks and downtown. • Number of projects that support pedestrians and bicylcists. Education and Awareness Measured by: • Number of education opportunities in Federal Way. • Participation in education and encouragement programs. Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Healih - Seattle & King County. 47 58 ! � DRAFT City of Federal Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Maintenance and Operations Measured by: • Percentage of bikeways and pedestrian facilities that are in good repair. • Percentage of bikeways and pedestrian facilities that meet best practices. Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 48 59 ,� - A . . � . � � PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPOR�' DATE: 7anuary 25, 2012 To: Chair Merle Pfeifer and Members of the City of Federal Way Planning Commission FROM: Janet Shull, AICP, Senior Planner Patrick Doherty, Director of Community and Economic Development SUBJECT Adoption of Proposed Bicycle anii Pedestrian Master Plan Fri.E: 11-105067-00-UP, ll-105069-sE MEETING DATE February 1, 2012 I. REASON FOR AMENDMENT T'he proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan will serve as an update to the Transportation Element of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan will update the existing Non-motorized section of the Transportation Element. The Non-motorized section of the Transportation Element was last updated in 2003. Since that time, there have been shifts in Federal, State, and regional policy that place increased emphasis on the public health and economic development benefits of improved access and safety for pedestrians and bicyclists in local communities. Related to these policy shifts, are programmatic shifts that are guiding additional transportation funding resources to bicycle and pedestrian facility improvements. II . BACKGROUND The City of Federal Way received funding from Public Health Seattle-King County through the CPPW (Communities Putting Prevention to Work) program in the spring of 2010. This grant funded the development of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, a Subarea Plan for the Twin Lakes Commercial District, and assistance with policy development to increase access to healthy food in Federal Way. The grant helped fund staff resources as well as provided access to the resources of transportation consultants as well as the resources from non-profit bicycle organizations and the University of Washington. One of the objectives of the CPPW grant program is to support increased opportunities for physical activity and recreation through policy, systems and environmental changes. The proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan provides updated information on the existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities and analyzes opportunities to add facilities to expand the 60 network, improve safety, and improve connectivity between neighborhoods and business centers, recreation and schools. The proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan was developed over an 18-month period with public input in the form of electronic survey, public open house-style workshops, and advisory committee meetings. In addition, the city established a social media website called "Engage Federal Way" that functioned as a virtual town hall meeting that received over 1,300 unique visits during the 6 months it was active. III. OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN The proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan consists of five sections. l. Introduction and Background 2. Goals and Objectives 3. Existing Conditions and Analysis 4. Proposed Facility Networks 5. Moving Forward — Next Steps The plan summarizes the context (Federal, State, regional) within which the planning and development of bicycle and pedestrian facilities takes place. It highlights recent transportation policy shifts that are placing increased emphasis on bicycle and pedestrian facility development. The plan development process including public participation is presented along with a summary of public input received. Technical analysis of the transportation network includes an analysis of the primary corridors for their ability to accommodate bicycle and pedestrian improvements. A selection of corridors is analyzed as to its existing level of service for pedestrians and bicyclists. Proposed locations for new bicycle and pedestrian facilities are presented in Section 4. Section 5 outlines next steps for incorporating the proposed facilities into the overa.11 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) and moving toward implementation of the plan. IV. REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.80, "Council Rezones." establishes a process and criteria for comprehensive plan amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the role of the Planning Commission is as follows: 1. To review and evaluate the requests for comprehensive plan amendments; 2. To determine whether the proposed comprehensive plan amendments meets the criteria provided by FWRC Sections19.80.140, 19.80.150, and 19.75.130(3); and 3. To forward a recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption of the proposed comprehensive plan amendments. V. DECISIONAL CRITERIA FWRC 19.80.150 provides criteria for comprehensive plan amendments. The following section analyzes the compliance of the proposed amendments with the criteria provided by FWRC 19.80.150. The city may amend the plan only if it finds that: 1. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare. Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Planning Commission Staff Report Page 2 61 a. Staff Response — The proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, and welfare because it will result in an improved network of walking bicycling facilities throughout the city that will enhance citizens ability to move about the city on foot and bicycle which provides greater opportunity for health, as well as safe travel throughout the city. 2. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the city. a. Staff Response - The proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is in the best interest of the residents of the city because it will provide for better access to schools, parks, and business centers for those who choose to walk and bicycle; or rely on walking and bicycling to move about the city. Improved pedestrian and bicycle facilities also support the city's economic development efforts by providing residents better access to businesses near where they live. 3. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the city's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. a. Staff Response — The proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and will be incorporated into the existing Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan to update the existing non-motorized section as part of the annual update process. The proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is consistent with the other portions of the city's adopted plan. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan shown in Exhibit A be recommended for approval to the City Council. VII. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Consistent with the provisions of FWRC 19.80.240, the Planning Commission may take the following actions regarding the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment: 1. Recommend to City Council adoption of Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan as proposed; 2. Modify the proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and recommend adoption to City Council as modified; 3. Recommend to City Council that the proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan not be adopted; or 4. Forward the proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan to City Council without a recommendation. �II. EXHIBITS A. Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Planning Commission Staff Report Page 3 62 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PLANNING COMMISSION February 1, 2012 City Hall 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers MEETING MINUTES Commissioners present: Merle Pfeifer, Tom Medhurst, Tim O'Neit, Lawson Bronson, and Sarady Long. Commissioners absent: Hope Elder and Wayne Carlson (both excused}. Staffpresent: Planning Manager Isaac Conlen, Principal Planner Margaret Clark, Senior Planner Janet Shull, Associate Planner Matthew Herrera, Assistant PJanner Becky Chapin, City T'raffic Engineer Rick Perez, and Administrative Assistant II Tina Piety. CALL TO ORDER Chair Pfeifer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of December 7, 2011, were approved as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENT None ADM[NISTRATIVE REPORT None COMMISSION BUSINESS ELECT[ONS Commissioner Medhurst nominated current Chair Pfeifer to continue as chair. There were no other nominees. Chair Pfeifer was voted to continue as chair. Chair Pfeifer nominated Commissioner Medhurst as vice-chair. There were no other nominees. Commissioner Medhurst was voted in as vice-chair. PUS[,[C HEa►RING — Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan Senior Planner Shull and City Traffic Engineer Perez delivered the staff report. The proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan will be a stand-alone planning document, as well as serve as a basis to update the non-motorized section of the Transportation Element of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan at the time the annual update is done. One of the purposes of the plan is to improve the health of Federal Way citizens by increased access to safe and convenient bicycling and walking facilities. Staff sought public input through a survey and a social media site (EngageFederal Way); the site received over 1000 hits and many left comments and discussions. In addition, staff recruited a 20 member advisory committee to help develop goals and objectives and a proposed network. Finally, staff sought technical assistance from SvR Design Company and Alta Planning + Design. The overall goal is to enhance community livability, health, and transportation by providing a connected system of pedestrian and bicycle ways that is integrated into a coordinated regional network. There are five goal categories: K:1Ptanning.Commission�201 I�htee[ing Summary 02-01-12.doc 63. Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 February l, 2012 • B�cycle and Pedestrian Network and Support Facilities — Develop a network that allows for safe and convenient movement throughout the city and to the regional network. • Safery, Securitv, and Equiry — Provide safe connections between neighborhoods, business centers, parks and recreation facilities, and schools, and consider the needs of all residents, especially those who do not have access to private vehicles. • Transportation and Land Use — Consider adjacent land uses and their potential to generate walking and biking travel when determining where walking and cycling improvements are most needed. • Education and Awareness — Open the lines of communication so that all users of the transportation network have improved awareness of the need to share the roadways and trails, and recognize and observe traffic safety laws. • Maintenance and Operations - Ensure that biking and walking facilities are kept in good condition and work well for the intended users. Mr. Perez went over the existing condition ofthe city's bicycle and pedestrian facilities. He stated we have a network, but it is incomp(ete. The city has used Level of Service (LOS) as the methodology for measuring the performance of roadways. This methodology is based on perspective of automobile drivers. The Complete Streets policy recognizes the importance of considering all roadway users; therefore, the analysis method used in this plan is a Mu(timodal LOS (MMLOS) analysis is based on ail roadway users (bikes, foot traffic, etc.). `I'he plan proposes to add an additional 66 miles of bicyc(e facilities to the existing network. There will be a variety of facility types added_ Not all desired bike route corridors can be retrofitted to add dedicated bicycle facilities. T'he plan proposes to add an additional 72 miles of pedestrian facilities to the existing network. They will mostly consist of sidewalks in areas identified as designated safe walking routes to schoots. The plan also proposes to incorporate necv trail facilities. I'his is a iong-term ptan — we will not be able to create this network overnight. The approximate cost (in today's dollars) for the entire proposed network is $140 million. The city must research what funding may be available. In addition, the city will utitize prioritization criteria to determine priority projects for inclusion in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) as part of the formal comprehensive plan update process. Commissioner Long recused himseif from voting because he is the Senior Transportation Planning Engineer for the City of Federal Way. He participated in the discussion. There was no public testimony. Commissioner Long asked if the plan takes safety improvements into account and whether safety improvements can be added without lowering the level-of-service. City Traffic Engineer Perez responded that the plan dces take safety improvements into account, especially in regards to turning vehicles at intersections. They have researched such issues as right-turn on red and omitting the flashing yellow when pedestrians are in the crosswalk. Commissioner Long asked if they researched allowing an exclusive pedestrian phase at a traffic signa( just for pedestrians to cross in a(1 directions. City Traffic Engineer Perez responded that was considered. There would be tradeoffs. Such a system would increase the cycle length. [t would be difficult to enforce a no right-turn on red under such a system and it could tead to more rear-end cottisions. Commissioner Medhurst asked of the proposed cost, how much is currently funded. City Traffic Engineer Perez replied that the city cunently spends approximately $8 million annually that could be used for design and construction of all transportation facilities. "The city will apply for appropriate grants to help with funding. K�. W lanning Commission�30I 1�Meeting Summary 03-01-i Z.doc 6 4 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 February l, 2012 Commissioner Bronson asked how effective is the right-turn on red? Does it add to the flow of traffic? City Traffic Engineer Perez responded that it is difficult to say for certain. Right-turn on red can cause conflicts with pedestrians, but there are likely to be more conflicts with right-turn on green only. From the perspective of the driver, right-turn on red is a safer move. Commissioner Long asked what is the state (aw regarding allowing bicycles on sidewalks. City Traffic Engineer Perez replied that the state leaves it to the city to decide and Federal Way allows bicycles on the sidewalk. Chair Pfeifer asked what is a reasonable timeline for these projects. City Traffic Engineer Perez responded that first they must be funded and that is very difficult under present circumstances. The state is collecting less revenue from the gas tax for road projects. The state is considering other ways of raising funds, but there is a lot of politicking that will take place before any new funding source is approved. Commissioner Long commented that this plan does not appear to have any stand-alone bike projects. City Traffic Engineer Perez repiied that it is a mix of stand-alone and capital projects. Commissioner Bronson moved (and it was secondec� to recommend approvai of the proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan as presented. There was no further discussion. The motion carried unanimousty with one recused. The public hearing was closed. PUB[,[C HEA[uNG — Twin Lakes Commercial District Subarea Ptan Associate P(anner Herrera delivered the staff report. The proposed Twin Lakes Commercial District Subarea Plan provides a blueprint for the neighborhood's future growth, development, and redevelopment. The proposed plan will allow the city to be holistic in its approach to planning in the area, as opposed to piecemeal zoning code amendments. If adopted, the proposed plan will become an element of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. It is intended to be a"living documenY'that will be changed if the vision, goais, and values of the community evolve with future generations. Staff sought pub(ic input through a survey, public workshops (that were we11 attended and generated many ideas), and a social media site (EngageFederal Way); the site received over 1000 hits and many left comments and discussions. Staff sent out press releases and mailed notices to businesses in the proposed subarea. A stakeholders group of business, civic, and neighborhood representatives was created to advise staff. [n addition, staff sought technical assistance from CPPW grant consultants SvR Design and CollinsWoerman. The overall vision of the proposed subarea is a neighborhood scaled commerce center that will contain improvements that are unique, attractive, viable, accessible, safe, and prosperous. There will be improved facilities for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit users, and opportunities for healthy food access. The proposed plan consists of four goal and policy sections: • Building & Site Design - Create an environment that is conducive to increasing foot traffic, supporting diversified economic development, and providing a safe, visually interesting and vibrant experience for visitors and residents of the subarea. • Economic Development � Redevelopment - Create strategies for developing new businesses using existing assets, and promote land use strategies that provide opportunities for entrepreneurship and focus on retaining local businesses. • Bicycle & Pedestrian Mobility - Enhance community livability health, and transportation in the subarea by providing a connected system of pedestrian and bicycle ways that is integrated into the citywide and coordinated regional networks. • Healthy Eating & Food Access - Encourage existing businesses to provide healthy food options and improve access to healthier food choices. Expand opportunities to grow, market, distribute, and consume locally grown food. K:�Planning Commission�2011V�teeting Summary 02-01-12Aoc 65 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 Eebruary 1, 2012 City staff suggests using a form-based code to achieve the vision. T'his "Form-Based Code" approach to community design will ensure development in the subarea provides amenities that are attainable and desired locally. Designing a form-based code is an intensive process and the city would need to have a group dedicated to designing it. A form-based code is a more il(ustrative document that provides predictability. It shows potential developers up-front what a building woutd be expected to look like. The meeting was opened for pubiic comments. Lori DeYore, Realtor, Federal Way Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors Chair — She thanked the staff and city for their work and the opportunity to comment on this issue. She feels the staff is open and responsive to the needs and wants of the community. She feels the proposed plan provides what people want and that it will beautify the subarea. The proposed plan will provide safe streets for bicycles and pedestrians and will ease traffic issues. She is proud of having been a part of the devetopment of this plan. Thom MacFarlane — He also thanked the staff for the process. The workshops were welt attended and gen�rated a number of good ideas. He asked how this plan will occur. Also, he had heard discussion at the workshops in regards to green design (specificatly grey water), but nothing has been said this evening about incorporating green design. Sheryl Sanderson — She had attended the second workshop. One issue that concerns her is calling the proposed subarea a destination location. She is concerned this will lead to more people and traffic. She is also concerned that mixed-use (specifically the multi-residential aspect) will lower home values. Public comment was closed. Associate Planner Herrera responded to the issues raised. In regards to how this plan will occur, there will be a chance for additional public input during the City Council committee and City Council meetings. Once adopted, implementation wou(d be through the zoning code amendment process and additional input will be sought during this stage. [n regards to green design, while he did not mention it, green design is part of the proposed plan. In regards to the proposed subarea becoming a destination location, staff does not want to detract from the City Center being the city's main destination location. Any traffic increase that might occur due to any particular project would be mitigated as part of that project's land use review. In regards to mixed-use zoning, Associate Planner Herrera as not seen an}� evidence that mixed-use zoning adversely affects property values. Commissioner Long asked ifthe proposed plan considers height increases. Associate Planner Herrera replied that it does not specify height increases. The plan identifies that mixed use development will require the need for a height greater than the 35-feet currently allowed. Height increases would require a zoning code amendment. Staff recommends, with community guidance, a desired height somewhere between 35 and 65 feet. Commissioner O'Neil asked about many buildings and land is vacant. Associate Planner Herrera responded he does not have this information. Commissioner Medhurst asked if there are infill opportunities. Associate Planner Herrera replied not much. Parking lots might be infilled, but the city would have to change the parking code. Currently the number of parking stalls is based on the need for the day after Thanksgiving. One could ask does the city really need to pian to meet the need of one day. Commissioner Medhurst commented that on page 16 of the proposed ptan it talks about exploring the use of zoning incentives. How would this work? Associate Planner Herrera stated that for example, the city could allow a building to increase their height if they include a roof-top garden, or a usable (with benches, etc.) plaza. Commissioner Long asked if the public would be able to comment on any proposed projects. Associate Planner Herrera commented that a number of the city's land use review process call for public comments. K:�Planning Commission`,2�I I�N[eeting Summary 02-01-12.doc 66 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 February l, 2012 Commissioner Bronson thanked the staff for their work and commented he supports the proposed plan, but he is concerned with the name. This area is not Twin Lakes. Associate Planner Henera stated they heard the same complaint from the Twin Lakes Homeowners Association. The city chose the name Twin Lakes because many businesses in the area have Twin Lakes in their name (such as the Twin Lakes Post Office). At the request of the Twin Lakes HOA, staff attempted to differentiate the subarea from Twin Lakes proper by titling it the Twin Lakes Commercial District Subarea Plan. Staff did not hear much from anyone e(se regarding the use of Twin Lakes. There was additional discussion about form-based codes. Principal Planner Clark noted that the city would have to give direction for form-based codes to be used. Commissioner Long moved (and it was secondec� to recommend approval of the proposed Twin Lakes Commercial District Subarea Pian as presented. There was no further discussion. The motion carried unanimously. The public hearing was closed. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS The next Planning Commission meeting has been reschedu(ed to February 22, 2012, at 7:00 p.m. in the Hylebos Conference Room (located next to the Council Chambers). ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. K:�Planning Commission�2011�ivieeting Summary 02A1-12.doc 6 7 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ITEM #: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUB.TECT: Twin Lakes Commercial District Subarea Plan POLICY QUESTION Should the City adopt the Twin Lakes Commercial District Subarea Plan and integate the document as the eleventh element of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. COMMITTEE Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) ❑ Consent � Ordinance ❑ City Council Business STAFF REPORT BY: Matthew ❑ Resolution Associate Planner MEETING DATE February 13 , 2012 ❑ Public Hearing ❑ Other DEPT: Community & Economic Development Attachments: (1) Draft ordinance with E�ibit A-Draft Twin Lakes Commercial District Subarea Plau�, (2) Planning Commission sta.ff report; and (3) Draft minutes of the February 1, 2012 Planning Commission meeting; Background: The City accepted tlie Communities Putting Prevention to Work grant in 2010 with the purpose of integrating healthy eating and active living policies into city planning docuxnents. Grant resources were utilized to prepare a subarea plan for the Neighborhood Business zone centered at the intersection at 21 Avenue SW and SW 336`�' Street/SW Campus Drive. Through the community planning process, a Twin Lakes Commercial District Plan was prepared which includes goals and policies related to building and site design, economic development and redevelopment, bicycle and pedestrian mobility, and healthy eating and food access. This document is intended to provide policy guidance for the 20-year comprehensive planning horizon. Options Considered: 1) Adopt the Mayor's recommendation as contained in the draft adoption ordinance; 2) adopt the Mayor's recommendation as modified by the LUTC; 3) do not adopt the Mayor's recommendation; or (4) refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further proceedings. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION The Mayor recommends adoption of the proposed amendments as written in the draft ordinance n � MAYOR APPROVAL: l 1 DIRECTOR APPROVAL: � C � ee Council Committee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION I move to forward the proposed ordinance to First Reading on Februcxry 21 2012. Committee Chair C ommittee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION(S): 1 READING OF ORDINANCE (FEBRUARY 21, 2012): " I move to forward approval of the ordinance to the March 6, 2012 Council Meeting for adoption. " 2 READING OF ORDINANCE (MARCH 6 , 2Q12) " I move approval of the proposed ordinance " Continued on following page 68 (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED IsT reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO AC1'ION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances onlyJ ORDINANCE # REVISED — 08/I22010 RESOLUTION # 69 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINAI�TCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to amendments to the City's comprehensive plan and the adoption of the 'Fwin Lakes Commercial District Subarea Plan. (Amending ordinance Nos. . 90-43, 95-248, 96-270, 98-330, 00-372, O1-405, 03-442, 04-460, 04- 461, 04-462, 05-490, OS-491, OS-492, 07-558, 09-614,10-671 and 11-683) WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act of 1990 as amended (Chapter 36.70A RCW or "GMA"), requires the City of Federal Way to adopt a comprehensive plan which includes a land use element (including a land use map), housing element, capital facilities plan element, utilities element, economic development element, and transportation element (including transportation system map[s]); and WHEREAS, the GMA also requires the City of Federal Way to adopt development regulations implementing its comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted its comprehensive plan with a land use map (the "Plan") on November 21, 1995, and adopted development regulations and a zoning map implementing the Plan on July 2,1996; and subsequently amended the comprehensive plan, land use map, and zoning map on December 23, 1998; September 14, 2000; November 1, 2001; Mazch 27, 2003; July 20, 2004; June 16, 2005; July 16, 2007; June 1 l, 2009; October 28, 2010; and January 27, 201 l; and WHEREAS, the City may consider Plan and development regulation amendments pursuant to Process VI, under Title 19 (Zoning and Development Code) of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC), chapter 19.80 FWRC, pursuant to chapter 19.35 FWRC; and WHEREAS, under RCW 36.70A.130, the Plan and development regulations are subject to continuing review and evaluation, but the Plan may be amended no more than one time per year with Ordinance No. 11- Page 1 of S Rev 1/10 CP ..v.� � � �� f �o EXH��#1' �l b � d'',., d �:. : �t � � � : u - . PAGE..1.......0�...�... limited exceptions such as the adoption of subarea plans; and WHEREAS, the City accepted the Communities Putting Prevention to Work grant administered by Public Health-Seattle & King County with the purpose of integrating healthy eating and active living policies in city planning documents; and WHEREAS, the City utilized grant resources to execute a community planning effort resulting in a subarea plan for the Neighborhood Business zone centered at the intersection of 21 St Avenue SW and SW 336�' StreetlSW Campus Drive known as the Twin Lakes Commercial District; '� WHEREAS, the City obtained public input prior to producing a draft plan via a stakeholder group, social media and public workshops; and WHEREAS, on December 17, 2011, the City's SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance on the Twin Lakes Commercial District Subarea Comprehensive Plan Element; and WHEREAS, the City's Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 1, 2012, at the close of which they recommended to the council approval of the following amendment: adoption of the Twin Lakes Commercial District Plan Element WHEREAS, the Land Use/Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered the comprehensive plan amendments on February 13, 2012, following which it recommended approval of the Planning Commission's recommendations; and WHEREAS, the City Council, through its staff, Planning Commission, City Council committees, received, discussed, and considered the testimony, written comments, and material from the public, and considered the matter at its City Council meetings on February 21, 2012 and Mazch 6, Ordinance No. I 1- R � ti�` i� � �t;` R; : ,.,. �' ai� ", «.:�: �,� �� °� A.7 . �� ;� Page 2 of S , � �� PAGE__� ._..Q � .. 2012; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt the subarea plan as a new element of the comprehensive plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDER.AL WAY, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings and Conclusions. (a) The proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan text, as set forth in Exhibit A and attached hereto, are consistent with the Council vision for the City of Federal Way, will a11ow development which is compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods, including adjacent single- family uses, provide convenient goods and services at a pedestrian and neighborhood scale close to adj acent residential uses, and provide for transportation facilities to serve the sites, and therefore bear a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; are in the best interest of the residents of the City; and are consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A, the King County Countywide Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the Plan. (b) The proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan te�, as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, are compatible with adjacent land uses and will not negatively affect open space, streams, lakes, or wetlands, or the physical environment in general. The amendments will a11ow for growth and development consistent with the Plan's overall vision and with the Plan's land use element household and job projections, and will allow reasonable use of property subject to constraints necessary to protect environmentally sensitive areas. The amendments, therefore, bear a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; are in the best interest of the residents of the City; and are consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A, the King County Countywide Ordinance No. 11- Page 3 of 5 S � Y t"`a � �.;� --: E�:r#! �! �� ` t =r �. .. ........ � 2 � � . . . .. �'� � i�AGE..�...0�., s..._ Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the Plan. (c) The proposed amendments have complied with the appropriate process under state law and the FWRC. Section 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Adoption. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter amended in 1998, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 copies of which are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, is amended as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. Section 3. Amendment Authoritv. The adoption of plan and map amenclments in Section 2 above is pursuant to the authority granted by Chapters 36.70A and 35A.63 RCW, and pursuant to chapter 19.80 FWRC. Section 4. Severabilitv. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separa.te and severable. The i�validity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Savings Clause. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter amended in 1998, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004, 20Q5, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 shall remain in fu11 force and effect until these amendments become operative upon the effective date of this ordinance. Section 6. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the efFective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and �rmed. Section 7. Effective Date This ordinance sha11 take effect and be in force five (5) days after passage and publication, as provided by law. Ordinance No. 11- . � _ � �~� y �"° i ��. ,;�:� . , , _«+..., 1 �� -�� :�� .. ---.� ��. , - �� '3 PAGE_�.�.t��,. � , PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of � CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, SKIP PRIEST ATTEST: CITY CLERK, CAROL MCNEILLY, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY TI� CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO : Ordinance No. 11- Page S of 5 Rev 1/10 CP � 74 EXM��' � PAGE. � ...��. �... 1. Introduction The Subarea The focus of this subarea plan centers on the Neighborhood Business zone at the intersection of 21S` Ave. SW and SW Campus Dr./SW 336` St. (Figure 1). Residential areas within 1 /a mile of the business district were also included due to their walking distance and pedestrian/bicycle infrastructure needs. This retail area is the lazgest of the comprehensive plan's 14 identified Neighborhood Business nodes which are intended to provide convenient goods (e.g., groceries and hazdware) and services (e.g., dry cleaners, dentist, bank) at a pedestrian and neighborhood scale close to adjacent residential uses The subazea includes a mix of commercial uses such as grocery stores, banks, and restaurants. The surrounding azea includes both multiple-family and single-family high density residential housing in addition to public and insritutional uses such as a post o�ce, park and ride, fire station, schools, public parks, and churches. The 2010 census figures indicate the commercial district's surrounding residential azea contains 2,432 housing units and approximately 7,800 residents. Purpose This planning document provides a blueprint for the neighborhood's future growth, development and redevelopment. It may also be used as a model for the other Neighborhood Business (BN) zoned areas. During the subazea's planning process and through the initial adoption, the city and region have struggled to recover from the effects of the Great Recession. Within the subarea, one prominent storefront has remained vacant for years and sunounding single-family residential development has only slowly begun to recover. Additionally, public rights-of-ways in the subarea that were originally constructed prior to the city's incorporation were designed to carry primarily vehicle traffic and lack adequate pedestrian and bicycle facilities. This plan includes a framework of goals and policies that will provide guidance for redevelopment and capital improvements in the subarea and its surroundings. Updated design standards, greater mobility options and economic prosperity were important topics identified by the community during the planning effort which began in 2011. Tfiis "living document" is not static and is intended to be updated if the vision, goals and values of the community evolve with future generations. ., . 9 .'. ��. . . ,.r . �� s .. , . �: �, �� ,.� �� K:\CPPW Grant\Sub-area P1an�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc � EXH1�1�' PAGE._L_.OF� � 76 Communities Putting Prevention to Work Funding for the subarea plan was made possible by -�' .� t the Communities Putting Prevention to Work a �,� rv � (CPPW) grant from the Centers for Disease Control �� `� `'� and administered by Public Health — Seattle & King County. The term of the grant contract was a 20- month period from July 21, 2010, to March 19, 2012. An important goal of the CPPW program is to reduce health inequities by focusing on Communities Putting communities with the greatest disadvantages. PreYention to Work Federal Way is considered a focus area for the grant °'` `'` '' due to the disproportionate levels of income and chronic disease compared to the rest of King County. One purpose of the grant is for local governments to adopt policies that increase physical activity and improve nutritional opportunities. Zoning and capital improvement policies can affect physical activity and healthy food options. Adoption of the subarea plan will also address upcoming comprehensive plan requirements under the Growth Management Act (GMA) for local jurisdictions to adopt policies and plans that will increase physical activity. -,�� f *�", a p ,Y.� �. . ., . , _. . .. � � . .., �°`. ^» .._` � �,+, . _ .. , , _ _ . : �.: "; K:\CPPW GrantlSub-area P1an�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc �� EX�! , ��'_._ __..__.. PAGE�Q�.� 77 Figure 1 Twin Lakes Commercial District and Surrounding Residential Area ,�. , � t� �� - � � _- _ � . �,�� . � � �� _ � ". � 'Cai�•' ��.lC.' ' y .' � 1e �y ��:� �z�;,��" � � �`"' � '� ,n� .w y� s �� ": ` a� , . �' " � ;,, . � v � *. � � � � . , � � � '� . . �. : ,. j� . : .::. �� '� � � � � ' +�.,i�- a .-� u � : . ,�` . � ,� � .� �� , �� - � w ,� . �' � � t� �,. � �` r �. - ��, a - �, Y � � � � �, `�- � � � . � ��,�, �° '� '�. ;��.�. �� ^` �.>�. �� . �� .x �� ` r i � �, � � � *� �•�r �'�-�,,,� � Y _ �� ; µ �� a '� s #� A ,� #� " 4 � x �� {' ; ' � ,� .� + j' �' +� ��`�� . � ��. � �t. 4�, � +,a, : � ,--�,' . . o,� . � � ��, �� '�� `�� .. �� ,,. �a � .1 a . �.,�,�•� �+"' � +�� ,�, � �`� �' �' � ;r. � ;�� : �.� x , ,,, `., ,� . !7� �"" �"� �� e � j «�w», • � � k � � � �� .� v � „� g � � , � . �j: `.♦ � 11�..,'�, ' � , a •-�. . . ` `� �2` e.,-�� , ,, ��,, � . �„. iMp�� - ;�'°i a � ^xs �k;: ..�� 'a� .i.� � " � � t�: +�, .� 4w' � � d� � . � .. c, q � �� : s �, Efi_ � - --:�Y , + . �_ ..�� ' � , � .� � ; :� � ` � . . ,�,,, �- ' � r � �� '� �.�.� � �. , � �— . . . dn � v � : a r �� ' , � � , "�' �� , r .s.tq� ^�.o'� ,�A �" � , y �,. . �'�•. ��, d$� � _ - ��.z A�..^� • , �`v* �*:'F- � .�.�� , � �i : �e ' ,, . � , , - * , �'+�,�` - , �i _ p.. da� . #,r _ � s . _ � � ° -� � �-`�'��,�"_' "� � � � . � '�. � , ^ ; r s � � � , v. � _ - <..�. ; t , .. , . ,' � ,�,. . # ^ ' ... ,. y r. ... .: , . ' � . ' �� w� �� " �..� .�►h _ > - ��. � � ' . � �. . �: - � • " l � ? ; p�, � � , , _ > F �: �e..::�_..A f . ,� . , . .� v.u. . ' . . ' 3 i � . .. �.. .�. . i : ` . 3 �� ' , F � ' � .. � .. � .. : . ` �-,. a ..:��.� µ�� . 'y^�i� T � f� .. . � �• � . � .. Legend �*� � ,� . -:, � _� ,:_ � „�.#�,: p , s — . w : ,�,;. Q Sub ,4�ea Bouncdary , �, � , �,� ',� " ,� � ;�,. � � hborhood Business Zone � �° _ � �� ;� ;� � �� 1!4 Ad�e from BN Zone `�' ;�� . � �� PA�E,..�.....�� K:\CPPW Grant\Sub-area Plan�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc 3 78 2. Community Planning Process Planning for the future of the subarea has been a collaborative effort between the community and the city's planning staff. Gathering input and goaUpolicy development was accomplished by an initial informal survey, formation of a stakeholder group, utilizing an online townhall forum, and community workshops. These community planning methods provided the quantitative and qualitative amount of participation needed to complete this blueprint for the neighborhood's future in the relatively short amount of time allotted by conditions of the CPPW grant. Survey One of the first objectives in the process was to publicize the subarea plan and gauge community interest. Press releases were picked up by local media outlets steering citizens to the project website. From there, they could learn about the intent of the planning effort and participate in an informal survey regarding their own trips to the subarea. During the 57 days the survey was open, 87 visitors participated. Although more than half of the respondents live within a mile of the commercial area, nearly all of the trips are made via automobile. Later in the planning process, staff found that the need for more sidewalks and bicycling facilities was a popular theme with stakeholders and workshop participants. Social Media In an effort to reach out and capture more community input, the city utilized a new social media method - the online townhall. Planning staff contracted with Mindmixer.com to solicit ideas from , the community in a forum allowing participants to sign on �', 24-hours a day 7 days a week. Over 1,300 people visited �~�~ the site. Ideas were gathered and comments were posted FNGAGE regarding topics that were also popular during the F �� e �� y traditional meetings and workshops. Discussions topics �� ' i�c�uded building design characteristics, , ., ;-. , ,.� :;: :, ��cyeling/pedestrian mobility, economic development �* t ya�efeAe a1Way .om t♦ c�rnmunity gardens and farmers markets. Participants in -" K:\CPPW Grant�Sub-area PIan�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc 79 FA�E_�__..Q�� the online townhall were able to comment on the themes, suggest alternatives and have direct dialogue with other participants. Stakeholder Group A subarea stakeholder group was assembled to provide comment and direction on various community goals. This group includes area business owners, surrounding residents and mernbers from Federal Way Chamber of Commerce, AmeriCorps/Westway Homeowners, Federal Way Planning Commission, and YMCA. Stakeholders met with city staff during three public meetings held in 2011. Stakeholders also provided assistance to staff facilitating two community workshops. Initial 5takeholder Visioos • Modest increase in building heights • Redevelopment that includes unique mixed use design • Community gardens • Farmers Markets • Improved bicycling facilities (on-street markings, connection to BPA, sight distance) • Updates to existing retai( areas + More park space � Youth friendly • Pedestrian improvements (sidewalks, safe routes to school, mid-block crossings, decrease curb- cuts) • Transit improvements (safe access, bike lockers, connectivity) • Sunvort business Community Workshops Two public meetings were held to gather comments from the community and to provide information on tools and methods to achieve stated goals. Each meeting began as an informal open house that provided participants an opportunity to learn about the background of the subarea planning process and ask questions of staff. Following the open house, participants were divided into groups, depending on their interest, for in- depth discussion regarding design, mobility, economic development and healthy food access. The intent of the first warkshop was to � collect ideas from participants and �-,- , listen to concerns. After the The mobility table o,�`'ers uleas to make the neighborhood discussion, stakeholders from each safer to walk and bike table summarized their respective dialogue to the entire group. The second workshop provided participants alternatives, an explanation of tools and the regulatory structure of how to implement their ideas and address their concerns. � K:\CPPW Grant�.Sub-azea Ptan�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc $o RA�E.�.��.�� These tools then became a framework in developing the goals and policies chapter of this subarea plan It should be noted that not all participants agreed with several of the goals and implementation suggestions such as height increases and mixed use development. However, goals and policies do represent a majority consensus of participants in the planning exercise. Goals • Public safety (better lighting, eyes on street) • Walkable neighborhood with opportunities for pedestrian gathering and interaction. • Flexibility in buiiding design and use (promote sustainable and green building techniques). • Improved transit routes from Pazk & Ride facility • Safe sidewalk and bicycle facilities • Better lighting • Community gardens • Farmers Markets • Make business district a"destination" location Existing Assets • Residents • Potential of area • Retail and service diversity • Parks • Aquatic Center • Proximity to BPA trail Challenges • Too many curb-cuts • Vacancies • Building height and setback limitations • Outside ownership of properties • Traffic (volume and high speeds) • Aesthetics of existing strip development __ �:\CPPW'Grarit�Sub-area P1an�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc �� '" '" i�. " � ..� 8� P��.��. Staff answers qteestions during the pre-workshop open house The healthy food access table discassses opportunities for community gardens 3. Existing Conditions The Twin Lakes Commercial District (Figctre 3.1) is located at the intersection of Zl Ave SW and SW 336` SdCampus Dr. The 48 acre Neighborhood Business (BN) zone is the largest of the 14 BN zones identified in the Fecteral Way Comprehensive Plan. BN zoning designations are intended to provide convenient goods and services while maintaining a pedestrian and neighborhood scale. The Twin Lakes Commercial District is surrounded by multi-family and single-family residential uses. This mix of multiple and single family development amount to mvre than 2,400 housing units within a 1 /a mile of the BN zone boundaries. In addition to residential and commercial uses, the focus area includes publicly owned facilities operated by South King Fire and Rescue, Federal Way Public Schools, City of Federal Way Public Works and Parks Department, King County Metro and United States Postal Service. ; , a � �s�.v a29 �T � � ;; �s � ,� g,,y 4 � � � , ;'t`� r�" , 'S�t s ' Q > �� Zg �; � MM ` g t �''• , � � � ^ �Q ~ n 4 t � � ,"} M i S S z , , ; , � � �, *�� <,-� — � / ., :, F E O E R a ' . 3<'� � s� , A Y � a� �,� � ; $: �� .. �,: ' S '.3„' . � :,V i;:jSY Q� � r., _-_ � i� ._ 03 ry cs �3'' 2 af, �9'r �,.,.�..�,�3�� > ti^� � � d �� 5 .�, , 33� � �r� . � � m:. �..� 3� - '� -P � �l � s. a .. r -'�r � r ; � . - .?,;;� > °- . __ . .. . - �. ,% _� . ��c � pf ' Q o n �1 �., 2 Pi. � ,�y"`' .,�� ._ : ;: , _ ' . � � ,O 71 J� 7 � y . { ""n'. �ti� � � ' n ' . r yMtDtWHY :�� > � .�� CiSGi11f ., r . `l . � Jb'! 7 �� . ?� S ; -.. � i?:S l?l .- �."i 33A �T .. , Rj�B '_ y >' � ^: � � 3 `� � �! �;.. ,: '� '.. \ -- ApaMMnb � c.v`f "�3�q��.. � � � r � � .� "�- � FItY v�� S? � ,; � c _. v'�1`r�3�,-� a�uaants n 63 ''� ,�' 4" ; �7- .n � »,l p .7"'. � . . :, a i �?L , ... . . . .. ', �„; U " Sy�1 ___--1 SW CAM?U� p,Q,wa�, is�''- j ' U. � cws.ds� � �, rownhow�e. " r I. ,��' `� o` ,:,�-�' .� ,:a Sataway � ' i � �. � � � .� ��, � r L �� r j � �3� � _ J � k �.. , �J � ��of1� �5� � �� .- r�"�.. a �.. �3' op � .... �\, �f6 �'\ ^s tir,e r 95} S . . `_` P � S �. 33y � � _ � ! 5 'J� � � itLV' " � � JT .. � s � . M.. � 5; � c , � � , � -- ,.; '�JY � b° .._. S � 339 gT ._ _.. j lyeyx� _� �� .. sr�;�o p� !�,_____ -- _ MF , �� ' _ � � � � _ �, �..� '' ,a�o �- "�s3a; ,, o � f �,� 1.tt �� .•i �- �. 3* ' � . S'+u339"a " �'§ _ ' vT' '� - ri:� 5r�13�1 t_ �' �� .7:` _- �eY r . -� ; r i.�r, N' 'vt i , . � . S S .a_ .. S �j/ 3..2 ST . _ ;� . }- :A? ST 3 � .. . . � 3 � r y � - : �z 97 �'.. . , '--� � :,t.2 n � � ;n � r S6'v 332?'l . �. .�VV 3�.3 Sv' ")d'2 . �; _. � _ � �,. -i� 2 a s �' � Twin Lakes F- � ?�— � � � `, �� a - `:, ' � „�� ' ��":, SW 344 ST' R1de � �v�pt ,:_., ., .,�, . ,�.... .. , .�_,,,-.�,...,,�,. � _ _5�?c. �.i� a?.. ' ,� x s �• sn- 3�„ sT .._., , " r.tv,�teswraae,ytnw -� ^�':2 � - �:r7�i PL _;p� � ri4 a�, _ : �� ,,,_ � A aiekdPtaocmtP deetiawP4tn MamATwid t Figure 3.1 The Twin Lakes Commercial District (ouUined in red) ts the largest Neighborhood Business area in the city . �� K:\CPPW Grant�.Sub-azea Ptan�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc `� 82 Commercial District Characteristics Commercial development in the Twin Lakes Neighborhood Business area occurred prior to the city's 1990 incorporation. Surrounding residents have access to a variety of retail, service and restaurant amenities. According to King County Assessor data, the existing buildings in the BN zoned neighborhood total more than of 400,000 square feet of commercial space. Single-story strip mall design dominates the subarea's retail core. Anchor buildings contain considerable setbacks from 21S' Avenue SW and SW 336` Street/SW Campus Drive to accommodate parking lots. Although several individual pads containing banks, restaurants and vehicle service facilities are closer to the street, their entrances are insular and not predominately oriented toward the right-of-way. The intent of such development is typically auto-oriented without regard to other pedestrian, bicycling, or transit modes. Residential Characteristics Similar to the retail area, much of the housing within a quarter mile from the Neighborhood Business area boundary was developed pre-city incorporation. Multi-family housing, consisting of townhomes and apartments, abut the north and west portions of the commercial zone and single-family housing abuts the south and west. This spatia.l context results in an "inner ring" of housing capacity at approximately 15 housing units per acre to an "outer ring" capacity of approximately 6 housing units per acre. K:\CPPW Grant�Sutr area Plan�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc ��1��.� ....r��:��:..� 83 Twin Lakes Shopping Center, built in 1979, is anchored by SaCeway ana �ieaia Several single-family residential developments have begun construction or obtained preliminary approval prior to the adoption of this plan. The Wynstone and Campus Crest subdivisions adjacent to SW Campus Drive will provide 158 units Saghalie Firs at 19` Pl SW and SW 341 will provide 34 units; and Lakehaven Estates adjacent to 19`� Ave SW and SW 340`� will provide 13 units. In the future, properties in the subarea's southern area could be redeveloped with additional housing units as several of the properties contain the capacity to be subdivided under the current zoning regulations. Multi-family zoned property in the subarea consists of renter-occupied housing with the exception of the southeastern portion of the Westway neighborhood which consists of fee-simple lots. Stacked and attached housing ranging from studios to three bedrooms are typical options available to multi-family dwellers in the subarea. As shown in the following table, 1,162 housing units are provided in the subarea's multi-family zoned lots. Public Facilities The subarea contains recreational, emergency, postal, transit and educational facilities within its boundaries. These facilities are operated by several different govemment entities. Saghalfe Middle School — One of Federal Way Public School District's 37 schools, Saghalie Middle School is located at 33914 19`� Avenue SW and has been educating 6`�, 7`� and 8`� graders since 1994. Recent enrollment figures show 522 students attended Saghalie during the 2009-2010 school yeaz. Attendance boundaries for Saghalie span from: SW 320`� St. to the north; 10�' Ave SW to the east; SW 344`� Street to the south; and Hoyt Road SW to the west. � Fifteen lots within the subdivision aze zoned multi-family but will be developed with singe-family dwellings. A one-acre multi-family lot adjacent to Saghalie Park will likely be developed with multi-family housing in a future �hase of development. Earliest yeaz used for phased built developments. :: �` ; ,, , � �I�:\CPPW GrantlSub-area PIan�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc . . _ 84 PA�E.. �.._.�3�� Saghalie Pnrk — Located at 33914 ��"+��"�- " ` 19` Avenue SW, Saghalie Park is a 16.4 acre community park and one � of five active recreation parks in the city. Facilities providing � _ accommodations for softball/baseball, soccer/football, -° ' track, basketball, tennis, and volleyball axe provided. Additional features include a playground, picnic tables, benches, restrooms and off- StTeet p1SlClrig. CO1T11T1Urilty pat'ICS, Saghalie Park is operated joinfly between the city parks such as Saghalie, are considered department and Federal Way Public School District active recreation facilities that provide active and structured recreation opportunities for the community. Community parks have a large service area, ranging from a 2-mile radius out to the entire city if there is a unique attraction. AmeriCorps — The local AmeriCorps program is administered by Federal Way Public Schools. Located at 33250 21 Avenue SW, AmeriCorps members provide civic leadership via academic tutoririg services and community projects. Adderdale Park — Located at 2700 SW 340` Place, Alderdale is a two-acre neighborhood park. Facilities include a playground, basketball and tennis courts, picnic tables and benches, loop trail and large open lawn area. Neighborhood parks are designed primarily for non- supervised, non-organized recreation activities and are intended to serve an area of approximately one-half mile radius. As detailed in the city's Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan, Alderdale Park has the potential to serve as a neighborhood gathering place. United States Postal Office — Located at 1815 SW Campus Drive, the Twin Lakes branch post office provides retail mail services. Twin Lakes Park & Ride — Located at 34210 21 Avenue SW, the Twin Lakes Park and Ride has a 600 vehicle capacity. King County Metro routes 179- Downtown Seattle, 181-Auburn/Green River CC, and 197-University District Seattle and Pierce Transit route 62- Northeast Tacoma are served here. Plan�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc � �. � � 85 c z��T� ,., P�� d `°,��.��3 Fire Station 63 — Operated by South King Fire and Rescue, Station 63 provides fire, rescue and EMS services. Located at 33414 21st Av SW, the station responded to 2,429 calls in 2010. Transportation Transportation facilities in the subarea were constructed with a focus for automobile traffic resulting in few amenities for alternative modes such as walking, biking and transit. As the surrounding residential area developed in the 1960's and 1970's, the preferred subdivision design pattern included serpentine streets and cul-de-sacs without emphasis on connectivity. Additionally, sidewalks are lacking in man of the older residential 21st Ave SW and SW 336th StJSW Campus Pkwy y intersection rnntains the highest volumes ot travel in the subdivisions as segregated pedestrian Su�re�. amenities were not a county subdivision requirement. Therefore, developers chose not to construct them as a cost-saving measure further disincentivizing alternative modes of mobility. Street System — The subarea contains the four different street classifications: Principal Arterial, Principal Collector, Minor Collector and Local. Within residential subdivisions, traff'ic from local streets is picked up by collectors and then conveyed to arterials. Due to the many local streets lacking connectivity (i.e. cul-de-sacs and dead-ends), traffic flows are directed to arterial streets such as 21 Avenue SW and SW 336` St/SW Campus Dr. � 1�1.��, Y �._.�' � K:�CPPW Grant�Sub-aCea Plan�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commencal Dtstnct Plan.doc °�� _" �° 8 6 �if'! VI G.,,�,.1,......��.�.:.�.� *Locad streets not shown Much of the vehicle traffic in the subarea flows through the 21 Avenue and SW 336 St/SW Campus Drive intersection. Traffic volume counts conducted in the fourth quarter of 2011 show an east/west average weekday traffic count of approximately 28,000 vehicles and a north/south count of approximately 15,000 vehicles. Transit — Circuitous single-family residential street patterns and relatively low dwelling densities has relegated transit service to the two major arterials in the subarea. Residents have access to direct routes from the subarea to Downtown Seattle, University District, Auburn and NE Tacoma. These routes can be accessed from the Twin Lakes Park and Ride located at 34210 21 Ave SW. As shown in the chart below, parking counts have been well below the 600 stall capacity since 2005, but the data does not capture those who walk or bike to the transit center. The center's close proximity to the BPA Trail and new single- family residential housing stock can also provide a convenient Walk/Bike & Ride if adequate connections and wayfinding is made available. Table 3.3 Twin Lakes Park & Ride Utilization Year Count (4 Quarter Average) % Used 103 17% 98 16% 109 l8% 2008 I 171 2009 88 16% King Caunty Pnrk-nnd-Ride Lots Monthly Utiliyation Reports Bicycle System — Residents in the subarea have difficult choices to make when biking: (1) share the road with fast moving traffic along the major arterials; (2) share the sidewalk with pedestrians and numerous curb-cuts along those same major arterials; and/or (3) attempt to find connections along the local streets adding trip time. Unfortunately, existing bicycle facilities within the boundaries of the subarea are limited to the S W 344` Street bike lane/wide shoulder ending at the road terminus at 18` Avenue SW. The city is in the process of updating the citywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan which includes proposals for new facilities within the subarea such as bicycle boulevards, paved trails, enhanced shared sidewalks, and additional lane marking. P1an�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc 87 EXI"� N � !'�,_...� PAGE..�.-'��-�� Mid-block crossing on 21st Ave SW near Fred Meyer Pedestrian System — Sidewalks in the subarea are limited to arterials, collectors and recent residential subdivisions. And while sidewalks are provided on major thoroughfares, several segments are substandard with regard to width and Americans with Disabilities (ADA) standards. Most of the residential subdivisions developed prior to the city's incorporation do not have segregated pedestrian amenities and do not have a history of pedestrian related collisions. Pedestrian collisions have been prevalent in the commercial district area. Since 2000, 27 pedestrian accidents have occurred in and around the 21 Ave SW and SW 336` Campus Drive intersection. To address safety issues, the city has constructed mid-block flashing beacon crossings approaching the arterial intersection and will implement additional safety improvements as part of the intersection's upcoming capital improvement project. The city's proposed update to � the Bicycle and Pedestrian °�` � Plan includes sidewalks in '� " " portions of the Village Park ��n�� on was developed prior to current pedestrian Village Green and Alder Grove subdivisions. Additional pedestrian improvements will occur with street improvement projects, commercial development, and subdivisions. K:�EPPW Grant�.Su6=area P1an�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc �.,.�.��-- � sa ��v1� �..��'_�� 4. Vision At the end of the 20-year comprehensive planning horizon, the subarea's commercial azea will be a neighborhood scaled commerce center for residents in the western portion of the city. The redevelopment of the Twin Lakes Commercial District will contain improvements that aze unique, attractive, viable, accessible, safe and prosperous. Itnproved connections from adjacent residential neighborhoods will lead to a center that is redeveloped with mixed use buildings designed with the guidance of an illustrative form based zoning ordinance developed by a diverse group of stakeholders. This "Form- Based Code" approach to community design will ensure development in the subarea provides amenities that are attainable and desired locally. The Twin Lakes Commercial District is an area that was designed primarily for automobiles with little regard for other modes of travel. Redeveloped properties will provide safe delineated connections for pedestrians to stores, offices and housing. This plan is not intended to replace automobile travel or capacity, but to ensure facilities that accommodate walking, bicycling, skateboarding, roller-skating and other future non- motorized travel not yet contemplated aze considered. This vision can only be accomplished via partnerships between the city, community, business and commercial property owners. The community has recognized through the planning process that the neighborhood needs a sense of identity and an updated commercial core. Next steps should include the adoption of a model Form-Based Code that will provide a clear image of a desired outcome. �P_ �{ �.�; .�nnd .,� � . Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc pAGE1`�1...._.�..:�'g 89 5. Goais & Policies The goals and policies chapter provides a flexible framework for implementation of the plan. Goals articulate a vision of the community's needs and desires while policies provide implementation strategies for meeting the vision. These statements will provide guidance for future zoning code revisions and capital improvements. 5.1 Building and Site Design Go�ls • Create an environment that is conducive to increasing foot traffic, supporting diversified economic development, and providing a safe, visually interesting and vibrant experience for visitors and residents of the subazea. • Focus on fostering community support and resources; increasing the economic, environmental, and social well-being of the subarea to accomplish goals related to building and site chazacter. • Ensure that the regulatory environment (e.g., zoning regulations) continues to encourage a diversified mix of land uses, so as to create complementary activities and services in the subarea that meet the needs of residents and business owners — as well as contribute to overall community well-being. Policies • Promote builddng design that encourages opportunity and choice for a range of complementary business sizes and types o Utilize and implement tools with a special focus on encouraging the feasibility of mixed use commercial space for small businesses combined with housing uses, such as live/work units or flexible work spaces in mixed-use zones. These tools could include creating incentives for developers to develop buildings using a tazget Floor Area Ratio (FAR). o Encourage new infill development in the existing commercial center by allowing building heights that could make new housing, retail, and work space types feasible in the area around the intersection of SW 336`� St and 21 Ave SW. o As a component of an overall economic/market analysis for the subarea, consider the feasibility of providing a limited amount of lower-cost space for business start-ups, artist space, or community organizations. ��■ ■��a�s. � K:�CPPW Granc4Sub-are�Plan�PlanEUng Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc C�� A � 90 PAGE �_. 5' :,.�� • Promote flexibility in new development (including bcailding heights) to advc�nce community clesign priorities ,. ., . .� • Explore the use of zoning incentives to encoasrage developers and property owners to create amenities in exchange for flexibiliry with certain zoning requirements. � Encourage private improvements that accommodate mailtiple types of users — especially children, youth, and seniors. Create guidelines for attractive building design based on local preferences o Consider conducting a community design charrette to engage interested stakeholders and create a specific vision based on clear illustrations of local design and character priorities. �� 6, �` � � P1an�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc 91 ��C�!�'��'�' T � PA��E..��...��.�;�. Encoc�rage development of scestainable buildings and site design. o Support opportunities for site improvements that utilize best practice standards such as Sustainable Sites, Built Green, or LEED. o Promote the use of Low Impact Development (LID), green- roofs, and rooftop gardens for existing properties and new development/redevelopment. Such improvements can also improve the look and feel of the pedestrian environment and encourage more physical activity. • Improve safety and access of bcsildings and surrounc�ing site area o Use existing CPTED principles to specifically identify and address safety issues in the subarea. „'�� • Place a special Natural drainage strategies can e�ectively roanage stormwater while providing attractive vegetation and emphasis on building pedestrian buffers entries as well as rear/service areas of buildings with regard to external lighting, and in accordance with existing design guidelines set forth by the City. • Access points and driveways for neighborhood retail, including grocery stores, should accommodate the safe and efficient movement of pedestrians and bicycles throughout parking areas and the site area in general. . • Promote visual access to the street from ground floor retail uses, and to pedestrian entrances and pedestrian-level display windows in order to promote "eyes on the street." K:\CPPW Grant�Sub-azea PIan�Plan�ing Commission\Twin Cakes Commerical District Plan.doc 92 �� !�!��_. �.�. �d1�� w�w��s • Promote the development of gathering spaces, with special attention to outdoor areas. o Promote outdoor patios or plazas adjacent to and/or accessible from pedestrian rights-of-way in new development or redevelopment. Also, work actively with current commercial property owners to encourage implementation of building/pedestrian orientation and landscaping elements of the community design guidelines within existing developments. o Promote gathering areas, site improvement, and placemaking projects that can actively utilize community resources to create these spaces. For example: benches, pocket parks/plazas integrated into the landscape and built environment, bus shelters, or community-based "intersection repair" projects. o Identify areas of opportunity for outdoor patios and other similar types of spaces that could be complementary to new or existing businesses — for example, restaurants, cafes, or grocery stores — and enhance the public realm. _. 'a�:t `�,. ,.a: e'+s. v t y "T� � ti � H. ` .; ��' .. .. ,t :•:Pl: . . Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc 93 �.� �. •. .. - - — - PAGE �_� ...�� ' �- .. y......�.,........b t........p..... rr"__ '_ _ development: 1)Adequate street lighting creates a feeling of safety, security, and territoriadity; 2) An enjoyable walking environment with large planters serving as a buffer to tra,f�c provide opponunities for wadking and an activity; 3) Clear visual access to storefronts and reduced setbacks for retail uses allow for more "eyes on the street"; 4) Benches and street plantings can enhance transportation corridors and provide for a more enjoyable and secure peclestrian realm. 5.2 Economic Development & Redevelopment Goals • Create strategies for developing new businesses using existing assets, and promote land use strategies that provide opportunities for entrepreneurship and focus on retaining local businesses • Ensure that future economic development plays a leading role in fostering a healthy, active community • Create economic benefits from providing safe opportunities for multiple modes of transportation to access local businesses Policies • Promote and support community based, small-scale businesses o Consider an economic/market study for the subarea detailing needs and viability for new retail and housing. o Encourage the creation of a Community Development Corporation, local business association, or Business Improvement District to help advance community economic development goals. • Work with the local Americorps office to help organize and build upon community volunteer assets. o Partner with South Sound Regional Business Incubator on outreach to local businesses. Assist in tailoring business developmendretention workshops to meet the community's needs � o Encourage future development that will include retail space appropriately scaled for small businesses and promote more affordable space for start-up businesses. • Create a sense of place through branding an identity, creating a gateway and integrating art into the landscape o Public art should be encouraged throughout the subazea. Where possible, art should serve a function that relates to a public health benefit. Examples of appropriate public art could include streetscape improvement, such as benches or sidewalk treatment that improve the usability and attractiveness of the public realm. Art can be incorporated into many aspects of the built environment, including seating, lighting, paving, wa� nding and signage. • Coordinate with local community gardens to grow appropriate plants for hanging baskets • Street and pedestrian lighting should be of similaz character throughout the business center K:\CPPW Grant�Sub-area Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.dce 94 PA�E_��._...,�� `.:��. o Identify one or two arterial roads to establish a gateway into the subarea. The approach from the east along SW Campus Drive could serve this purpose o Develop a neighborhood website, possibly as part of "Engage Federal Way," that features a local business directory and profiles locally owned businesses • Consider developing wayfinding specifically targeted towards multiple modes of travel. o Highlight community assets such as the Weyerhaeuser King County Aquatic Center, farmers market, community gardens and Saghalie Park / Saghalie Middle School, for example. �ty K:\CPPV� �r�t�$ub-azea P�t�an .-.Fa y"r;`` ;+. "� '. � ; , . . r ` PAGE.��°��.�'�... Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc 95 5�...�.....� ".. _ __-_'_' _-_ ____. o 0 as well as improve the pedestrian environ�nw � Utilize zoning and other regulatory tools to allow for more creativity and input on building and site design, and to promote healthy, active livireg. o Convene stakeholders – such as builders, developers, and real estate professionals – to help determine appropriate types of incentives o Consider the use of form-based codes as a tool to help explicitly illustrate how building and site design can improve the built environment o Encourage improvements with a clear link to public health benefits such as open space, rooftop gardens and trail connections. • Encourage land use strategies that promote attractdve housing, convenient access to retail, and opportunities for employment/self-employment for residents of the subarea. o Encourage mixed-use development, particularly around the intersection and neighborhood retail azea of SW 336`� St and 21 Ave SW, to promote opportunities to live and work in the same community, as well as to promote opportunities for entrepreneurial growth o Explore feasibility of mixed-used development within existing Neighborhood Business zoning regulations and ways to improve feasibility of mixed use development. Improve economic vitality by providing options for access to business areas via multiple transportation modes o Improve connections between the subarea and major community amenities such as the Weyerhaeuser King County Aquatic Center. For example, this could be accomplished by providing improvements to signage, creating a branding strategy for the subarea, or by focusing bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure improvements on corridors that connect the subarea to major community amenities. o Incorporate pedestrian-oriented planning principles from Federal Way Community Design Guidelines to encourage foot traffic. • Focus on improving safety for neighborhood residents o Use Crime Prevention through Environmental Design — CPTED — principles and techniques to specifically identify / address safety issues in the subarea and identify specific potential areas of concern, along with suggested improvements. This should include a special focus on safety along pedestrian and bicycle routes. E��' � PAGE. ;� 1....0�?-� K:\CPPW Grant�.Sub-area Plan�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc 2l T • Create opportcenities for nightlife activities. o Consider a seasonal "night market" that could be complementary to community events such as a farmers market, festivals or performances showcasing local talent, or opportunities to showcase / promote local business. 5.3 Bicycie and Pedestrian Mobility Goals • Enhance community livability, health, and transportation in the subarea by providing a connected system of pedestrian and bicycle ways that is integrated into the citywide and coordinated regional networks. • Develop a pedestrian and bicycle network accessible to all residents of the subarea. • Ensure that the pedestrian and bicycle system is safe and functional for all users. � Create efficient and convenient methods for pedestrians and bicyclists to travel to the places where they live, shop, work, and play. • Foster a community culture supportive of walking and bicycling as important modes of transportation and recreation. � Improve the bicycle and walking environment through enhanced traffic operations and maintenance '��(�!��'��... ..� -�� K:\CPPW GrantVSub-a'rea plan�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc 22 97 Policies • Improve bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and conreectivity o Improve pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure connectivity and identify the walking and bicycling network within the Subarea. o Build new roadways that accommodate pedestrian and bicycle facilities and retrofit older roadways to complete the system. o Complete missing links in pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure on existing street network as a priority measure. o Improve connections to transit — especially the Twin Lake Park and Ride — for pedestrians and bicyclists. o Develop a bicycle network connected to other neighborhood business centers within Federal Way, the Federal Way downtown, parks, trails, schools, recreation areas, and neighboring urban areas that supports a diversity of cycling abilities and interests. o Develop "connector trails" to link destinations and facilities not easily accessible on the existing street network and coordinate pathway projects with parks and open space agencies. o When appropriate, require implementation of pedestrian and bicycle facilities as part of new development. o Monitor bicycle and pedestrian facilities to ensure that safety is not being, K:\CPPW Grant�Sub-azea P1an�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc E��!!��` ,� �� 98 degraded over time. o The form, density and design of new commercial and business centers should support pedestrian and bicycle trip-making. Where possible, opportunities to enhance existing development to accomplish this end should be implemented as part of substantial redevelopment projects o Update pedestrian and bicycle facilities where appropriate to incorporate best practices. o Manage traffic control systems to better facilitate bicycle and walking travel along strategic corridors. Promote safe ancl corcvenient non-motorized transportation o Ensure high-quality, flexible and secure bicycle parking throughout the Subarea. o Provide wayfinding tools for pedestrians and bicyclists that encourage safety and promote use of non-motorized transportation modes. o Improve facility safety through design, operations, maintenance and education. K:\CPPW GrantlSub=atea P1an�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc 99 Focus on outreach and education to help promote safety and accessibiliry o Conduct outreach and education to increase safety and awazeness for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists; Provide easily accessible information about the pedestrian and bicycle system. o Ensure that pedestrian and bicycle facilities aze accessible to everyone in the community. o Apply traffic-calming techniques, where feasible, to address safety issues associated with vehicle speeds and volumes. o Develop programs that provide the option of shifting from driving to walking and biking for short trips within the City. • Support capacity-building for community activities focused on healthy, active living o Support creative local walking and biking events o Encourage walking and biking to community events. o Actively engage local walking and biking organizations to create opportunities to support bicycling and pedestrian safety and strengthen local capacity 5.4 Healthy Eating and Food Access Goals • Encourage existing businesses to provide healthy food options and improve access to healthier food choices. Empower the community to grow food. Expand opportunities to grow, market, distribute, and consume locally grown food. PoGcies • Work with multiple stakeholders to increase the number of commundty gardens o Facilitate temporary, interim, or joint-use agreements for potential sites for farmers mazkets, community gardens or urban agriculture, such as on Saghalie Middle School or Saghalie Park property; consider offering use of sites on city property at no or minimal cost. o Encourage the development of community gardens and urban agriculture in priority areas such as the Westway neighborhood. o Look for opportunities to develop P-patch gardens in close proximity to multi-family housing surrounding the intersection of SW 336`� St and 21 Ave SW. o Assist with facilitation of community design charrettes for future community gardens to help build a feeling of communj�� G K:1�PPW Grant�.Sub-a�� Pian�Pianning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc �i� i 1�� o Coordinate with Federal Way Community Gardens Foundation to develop a"how to" manual for establishing community gardens. Promote urban agriculture as an income generator o Consider the development of a mazket garden near the Westway neighborhood. Include a year-round fruit & vegetable stand that sells produce from the garden and local farmers o Consider enacting a code provision that reflects and supports Washington State's cottage food laws: SB 5748. This would allow residents to use their home kitchen to produce permitted sellable food items Compost food waste for soil o Encourage a composting relationship between restaurants and community gazdens. o Assist community gardens with finding resources to construct composring infrastructure and host workshops o Encourage Saghalie Middle School to provide their students with hands- on composting opportunities. This can be coordinated with science courses to create a"living laboratory" for small-scale agriculture. . . <. �:�_- , - i a� _. ,x; : °• �{:�CPPW Grant�Seb�-aCr�a�n�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc � . . .. ,,• PAGE 2� �� 1�1 Communiry gardens can help promote community-building, neighborhood character, and a sense of ownership among residents. • Pursue opportunities to grow food on vacant land with no current use or with low-intensity uses o Conduct and maintain an inventory of public and private vacant land; Communicate these potential land opportunities to community garden groups or farmers markets o Work with BPA and community organizations to utilize land along the BPA right of away for food production • Support land use strategies that support food retail opportunities for local rural and urban growers o Assist Federal Way Farmers Market with securing a space for a weekday market in the subarea o Engage private property owners, near the intersection of SW 336`� St and 21 Ave 5W, such as the owners of the former Albertson's store and parking lot, and explore opportunities to host a farmers mazket or allow mobile vending opportunities for healthy foods o Look at the feasibility of using public land near the intersection of SW 336�' St and 21 Ave 5W for a farmers market. o Consider the operation of a seasonal night mazket coordinated with other community events, such as festivals or performances Improve farmers market feasibility o Provide public space for little or no cost where possible and permitted. Where such uses are not currently permitted, consider appropriate opportunities to allow farmers mazkets as a permitted use. o Provide wa�nding along routes leading to the farmers market. • Facdlitate partnerships between food growers and local markets o Identify priority areas for fruidvegetable stands and work with stakeholders to create opportunities to grow and sell food. Priority areas could include Saghalie Middle School and the community of Westway. Create community security with community gardens and think strategically about preventdng vandalism o Partner with community organizations (AmeriCorps volunteers) to develop events, such as "garden days", that aim to bring community together and build community investment in the gardens o Utilize CPTED- based principles to deter vandals o Involve community members to create a sign for the gazden 1�:\CPPW Grant�itb=�ea P1an�Planning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc 1�2 PAGE.�?„�� o Use short picket-style fences to keep out pets and to clearly display the border of the garden. Use passive strategies, such as growing thorny plants along the fence (e.g. raspberries or roses) o Create a sheltered area where people can spend time to enjoy the garden and to keep the space in active use o Involve neighborhood children in garden maintenance - the neighborhood will be more invested if children use the space o Plant a donation or "vandal's garden" near the entrance. Place a sign that invites passers-by to take food to help demonstrate community goodwill o Demonstrate "ownership of place" — maintain active use of the garden to demonstrate that community members are using the space Crec�te economic opportunities for alternative food distribution models o Work with Fred Meyer, Albertsons or Safeway property owners to establish a mobile food cart zone or include mobile food vending provisions in the Zoning and Development Code to increase food options for employees near employment centers, transit-oriented development, and low-access areas. �� K:\CPPW Grant�Sub-area Plan�Pianning Commission\Twin Lakes Commerical District Plan.doc ��y+� /J Q �� :� �/ Z� VI ��i��w�w� 103 Mobile food vendors can create more options for healthy food retail, enhance neighborhood vitaltty, and provide new business development opportunities for neighborhood residents � � CITY OF � Federal Way PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: January 27, 2012 To: Chair Merle Pfeifer and Members of the City of Federal Way Planning Commission FROM: Matthew Henera, Associate Planner Patrick Doherty, Director of Community and Economic Development SUBJECT: Twin Lakes Commercial District Subarea Plan FII,E: 11-101366-00-UP MEETING DATE February 1, 2011 A. OvERV�w The Twin Lakes Commercial District Subarea Plan is the culmination of a 10-month community planning process encompassing the Neighborhood Business (Bl� zone centered at the intersection of 21 Avenue SW and SW 336`� Street/SW Campus Drive. The planning document outlines goals and policies for the subarea regarding economic development, building and site design, non-motorized transportation and healthy food access. This plan will become a new element within the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP). B. STAFF RECOMIVIENDATION City staff recommends adoption of the Twin Lakes Commercial District 5ubarea Plan attached as Exhibit A. .� _ � �_ ... - -- �..: . �. : - ,� - - - r,.�t�t� . - _ - � ; . . D. BACKGROUND • Concerns from area business owners and residents regarding the vacant storefronts in the commercial district prompted staff to evaluate a unique subarea plan for the city's largest Neighborhood Business (BI� zone. This planning exercise was then made a component of the 2011 Planning Commission Work Program. � FWCP 2.13 states: "Over the years, citizens from various areas of the City have come forth to t�stify before the Planning Commission and City Council regazding their neighborhood or business azea. Development of subarea plans can lead to area specific visions and policies. A . , � ..� � � �� EXl��!�'�' z �� p �� 104 PAGE....l._..t��._..�_.. This type of specific planning, developed with citizen input and direction, can lead to improved confidence and ownership in the community. Areas where subarea planning should be considered include: SR-99 Corridor, South 348th Street azea, the South 356th area, and Twin Lakes neighborhood.(emphasis added)" � In 2010, the City accepted Communities Putting Prevention to Work (CPPV� grant funding from Public Health — Seattle and King County to prepare a subarea plan for the Twin Lakes Commercial District and surrounding residential area. T'he grant is focused on adopting healthy eating and active living policies into city planning documents. • Staff assembled an 11-member stakeholder group to act as an advisory committee for plan prepazation. Three stakeholder meetings were scheduled in April, May and December 2011. Draft goals and policies were presented to stakeholders at the December meeting and made available online for comment. • Two public workshops and open houses were held in June and October 2011 for community participation. More than 40 attendees participated in the June workshop and open house where ideas were gathered. Staff and consultants returned in October with implementation tools and graphic representations. � An online townhall was initiated in June 2011 to solicit ideas via social media. The EngageFederalWay.com site had over 100 participants that provided ideas and dialogue over a 6-month period. � The planning document consists of five chapters that detail the purpose, community planning process, existing conditions, vision, and goals & policies. • Similar to the city's overall comprehensive plan, the plan's goals and policies provide flexible policy guidance for zoning code revisions and capital improvement projects within the subarea. E. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) (Eachibit B) was issued for the proposed subarea plan on December 17, 2011, pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act Rules 197-11-340. Notice of the environmental determination was provided in the Federal Way Mirror, City designated bulletin boards, and emailed to the project stakeholder group. The comment period ended on January 3, 2012, with no comments submitted to the City. Public notice of the Planning Comxnission hearing was emailed to department stakeholders, published in the Federal Way Mirror, and posted on the City designated bulletin boards January 13, 2012. This staff report was emailed to commissioners, project stakeholders and interested parties on January 27, 2012. Recipients of the staff report were directed to the city's website to view the subazea planning document due to the large file size Twin Lakes Commercial District Plan Page 2 Planning Commission Staff Report � K:\CPPW Grant�Sub-azea Plan\Planning Commission�PC Staff Report.doc , �+X� �� . . � _ . :�, b `�y' � � • � � ,� �05 PAGE. 2..._.��..�..._.. .�- � {� 4' '� „4 � � � {�.�:�:.': „_ ''"' .�., , .�, ..�'::z 4 a., F. BASIS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.80, Process VI establishes a process and criteria for comprehensive plan amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the role of the Planning Commission is as follows: 1. Conduct a public hearing; 2. Review and evaluate the requests for comprehensive plan amendments; 3. Determine whether the proposed comprehensive plan amendments meet the criteria provided by FWRC Sections 19.80.140 and 19.80.150. 4. Forward a recommendation to the City Council regazding adoption of the proposed comprehensive plan amendments. G. FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED IN A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT l. The effect upon the physical environment. o Staff Response - Adoption of the subarea plan, in itself, will not affect the physical environment. Any future development resulting from the adoption of Plan and subsequent amendments to the Official Zoning Map and Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) will be subject to review pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and must comply with all the requirements of the FWRC 2. The effect on open space, streams, and lakes. o Staff Response -Goals and policies in the planning document do not affect open space, streams and lakes. Future development resulting from the policy document will be subject to zoning and development review. Mitigation for any effects will be based on SEPA threshold deternunation or zoning and development code regulation. 3. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. o Staff Response - The subarea plan is consistent with the overall Federal Way Comprehensive Plan neighborhood business, single-family high density residential multiple-family residential and pazks and open space designations. The policy document provides goals and policies specific to the needs and desires of the subarea. Any future development resulting from adoption of the plan, and subsequent changes to the zoning regulations will be subject to review for compliance with all codes, including the Community Design Guidelines. 4. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools. o Staff Response - Impacts to the referenced essential public facilities will be mitigated at the time of development. Applicant's that propose development are required via Twin Lakes Commercial District Plan Page 3 Planning Commission Staff Report K:\CPPW �t'ai(t�Sy[R-�sea�PlanlPlanning Commission�PC Staff Report.doc ;o q EXl��` ., . �; � :� � . �� r �� PAGE.3 .t�� -_ _.. 106 FWRC, SEPA and State Growth Management Act regulations to improve or mitigate such impacts concurrendy with the development. 5. The benefit to the neighborhood, city, and region. o Staff Response — This policy document was drafted following a community planning process that sought out public participation through a stakeholder group, public workshops, and social media. The plan is a viable and consensus based document that will provide a vision for the neighborhood in the 20-yeaz comprehensive planning horizon. 6. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land. o Staff Response — N/A, this planning document does not propose to change land use designations or densities. 7. The current and projected population density in the area. o Staff Response — N/A, this planning document does not affect population density in the area. 8. The effect upon other aspects of the comprehensive plan. o Staff Response — This document is consistent and complimentary to the city's overall comprehensive plan. No changes to the plans designations or densities are proposed. H. DECISIONAL CRITERIA FWRC 19.80.150 provides the following criteria for comprehensive plan amendments. The city may amend the plan only if it finds that: 1. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare. a. Staff Response — The proposed subarea plan beazs substantial relationship to all three attributes as it includes policy recommendations related to pedestrian and bicycling improvements, healthy food access, building and site design and economic development. When implemented, these recommendations will provide: (1) greater opportunities for walking and biking; (2) opportunities to grow, market, distribute and consume locally grown food; (3) visually interesting architecture and site planning practices; and support of existing and future businesses. 2. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the City. a. Staff Response — The proposed subarea plan is in the best interest of the City as it provides a set of goals and policies that will guide future improvements in the neighborhood. A vision for the future will present a predictable path for residents and property owners Twin Lakes Commercial District Plan Page 4 Planning Commission Staff Report . K:\CPPW �i�d�`�li�� Plan�Planning Commission�PC Staff Report.doc f�� . , . . . � � . � PAGE `' ��.�... '� ��`� � 107 3. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the city's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. a. Staff Response — The proposed subarea plan is consistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act, including, but not limited to the following planning goals codified in RCW 36.70A.020: Urban growth; Transportation; Economic development; and Citizen participation and coordination. T'he amendment may be adopted outside of the city's regulazly scheduled once a year comprehensive plan update due to initial subarea adoption exceptions pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(i). The proposed plan is consistent and complementary to the overall Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. I. PLANNING COMMiSSION ACTION Consistent with the provisions of FWRC 19.80.240, the Planning Commission may take the following actions regarding the proposed development regulation amendments: 1. Recommend to City Council adoption of subarea plan as proposed; 2. Modify the proposed subarea plan and recommend adoption to City Council; 3. Recommend to City Council that the proposed subarea plan not be adopted; or 4. Forward the proposed subarea plan to City Council without a recommendation. Twin Lakes Comtnercial District Pian Planning Commission Staff Report K:�CPPW Grant�Sub-area P1an�Planning Commission�PC Staff Report.doc �o$ Page 5 �X�"�� ' PACE � �� CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PLANNING COMMISSION February 1, 2012 City Hall 7•00 p m Council Chambers MEETING NIINUTES Commissioners present: Merle Pfeifer, Tom Medhurst, Tim O'Neil, Lawson Bronson, and Sarady Long. Commissioners absent: Hope Elder and Wayne Carlson (both excused). Staff present: Planning Manager Isaac Conlen, Principal Planner Margazet Clark, Senior Planner Janet Shull, iate Planner Matthew Herrera, Assistant Planner Becky Chapin, City Traffic Engineer Rick Pere inistrative Assistant II Tina Piety. CALL TO ORDER Chair Pfeifer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. APPRO�AL OF MINUTES The minutes of December 7, 2011, were approved as AUDIENCE COMMENT None ADMIMSTRATIVE None '�.�air Pfeifer to continue as chair. There were no other e as chair. Chair Pfeifer nominated Commissioner Medhurst Commissioner Medhurst was voted in as vice-chair. PUBLIC H icycle &' estrian Master Plan Senior Planner Shu ,_City fic Engineer Perez delivered the staff report. The proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Master PI , a stand-alone planning document, as well as serve as a basis to update the non-motorized section o e Transportation Element of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan at the time the annual update is do . One of the purposes of the plan is to improve the health of Federal Way citizens by increased access to safe and convenient bicycling and walking facilities. Staff sought public input through a survey and a social media site (EngageFederal Way); the site received over 1000 hits and many left comments and discussions. In addition, stafF recruited a 20 member advisory committee to help develop goals and objectives and a proposed network. Finally, staff sought technical assistance from SvR Design Company and Alta Planning + Design. The overall goal is to enhance community livability, health, and transporta.tion by providing a connected system of pedestrian and bicycle ways that is integrated into a coordinated regional network. There are five goal categories: ��,'r' 3 : .< < � . _ , �09 paGE....�....o� s K:�Planning Commission'�OI IuvIeeting Summary Q2-01�14:doc �� ,�,, �,� �s. . .,� � � � : i �� # ..,, .w• " L° �. ::, ts" , ,.i a'.,i� l'"`, "" Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 February 1, 2012 • Bicycle and Pedestrian Network and Support Facilities — Develop a network that allows for safe and convenient movement throughout the city and to the regional network. • Safety, Security, and Equity — Provide safe connections between neighborhoods, business centers, parks and recreation facilities, and schools, and consider the needs of all residents, especially those who do not have access to private vehicles. • Transportation and Land Use — Consider adjacent land uses and their potential to generate walking and biking travel when determining where walking and cycling improvements are most needed. • Education and Awareness — Open the lines of communication so that all users of the transportation network have improved awareness of the need to share the roadways and trails, and recognize and observe traffic safety laws. r� • Maintenance and Operations — Ensure that biking and walking f� ies a�`e kept in good condition and work well for the intended users. _. , Mr. Perez went over the e�usting condition of the city's bicycle have a network, but it is incomplete. The city has used Level measuring the performance of roadways. This methodolo The Complete Streets policy recognizes the importance . ons analysis method used in this plan is a Multimodal LO,, ~ ( (bikes, foot traffic, etc.). , (LOS) all roadway us`� vsis is based on He stated we thodology for rtomobile drivers. ere ore, the wav users The plan proposes to add an additiona166 iles of bicycle a variety of facility types added. Not all des ' e route bicycle facilities. ��.�.,�� the existing network. There will be �.be retrofitted to add dedicated The plan proposes to add an additiona172 rniles pedes ''ties tor�e existing network. They will mostly consist of sidewalks in areas identified as i d sa �, g routes to schools. The plan also � proposes to incorporate ne ' 'ties. ��" This is a long-term pl will no able to create : is network ovemight. The approaumate cost (in today's dollars) for the en opos etwork is $140 ion. The city must research what funding may be available. In addition, the itiza,' % criteria to determine priority projects for inclusion in prov Plan °��` ransportation Improvement Plan (TIP) as part of the formal;�� `�npre up � �ocess. Co � er Long recuse � elf fro , ing because he is the Senior Transportation Planning Engineer City of Feder ay. H articipated in the discussion. There was no public testimony. Commissioner �'' sked if th an takes safety improvements into account and whether safety improvements can ded w' ut lowering the level-of-service. City Traffic Engineer Perez responded that the plan does tak'� ' provements into account, especially in regards to turning vehicles at intersections. They have � arched such issues as right-turn on red and omitting the flashing yellow when pedestrians are in= Y e crosswalk. Commissioner Long asked if they researched allowing an exclusive pedestrian phase at a traffic signal just for pedestrians to cross in all directions. City Traffic Engineer Perez responded that was considered. There would be tradeofFs. Such a system would increase the cycle length. It would be difficult to enforce a no right-turn on red under such a system and it could lead to more rear-end collisions. Commissioner Medhurst asked of the proposed cost, how much is currently funded. City Traffic Engineer Perez replied that the city currently spends approximately $8 million annually that could be used for design and construction of all transportation facilities. The city will apply for appropriate grants to hel �vith fund�, �, ;,� �f_ � � .. ,.,.,..��; • �� : ��. iio �X�� _, K��Ian��ommission�2011�U4l��02-01-12.doc �,,�:,r�. ..�� PaGE�:._.o�..� Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 February 1, 2012 Commissioner Bronson asked how effective is the right-turn on red? Does it add to the flow of traffic? City Traffic Engineer Perez responded that it is difficult to say for certain. Right-turn on red can cause conflicts with pedestrians, but there are likely to be more conflicts with right-turn on green only. From the perspective of the driver, right-turn on red is a safer move. Commissioner Long asked what is the state law regarding allowing bicycles on sidewalks. City Traffic Engineer Perez replied that the state leaves it to the city to decide and Federal Way allows bicycles on the sidewalk. Chair Pfeifer asked what is a reasonable timeline for these projects. City Traffic Engineer Perez responded that first they must be funded and that is very difficult under present circumstances. T'he state is collecting less revenue from the gas tax for road projects. The state is considering other ways of raising fund there is a lot of politicking that will take place before any new funding source is approve omm�ssioner Long commented that this plan does not appear to have any stand-alone bik ts. City Tr�c Engineer Perez replied that it is a mix of stand-alone and capital projects. Commissioner Bronson moved (and it was secondec� to re Pedestrian Master Plan as presented. There was no further with one recused. The public heazing was closed. � �proval o roposed Bicycle and T'he motion ' d unanimously PUSLIC HEARIlVG — Twin Lakes Commercial District Sub n Associate Planner Herrera delivered the sta . report. The propos in Lakes Commercial District Subarea Plan provides a blueprint for the ne "" hood's future gro development, and redevelopment. The proposed plan will allow the city to be h ' approach to ' the azea, as opposed to piecemeal zoning code amendments. If adopte ��he` y �plan will b e an element of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. It is intended to be a'ving '' F '`" that , 1 be changed if the vision, goals, and values of the community evolve with future g r Y s. t public input through a survey, public workshops (that wer � ded and gen d many id �, and a social media site (EngageFederal Way); ite rec over 1000 hi d many left comments and discussions. Staff sent out press releases and- notices usinesses in pro osed subarea. A stakeholders group of business, civic, and neigh d re ° sentatives was c d to advise staff. In addition, staff sought technical assistance from CP � Sv esign and CollinsWoerman. The plan iion o osed ea is a neighborhood scaled commerce center that will contain that are un ttract 'ab , accessible, safe, and prosperous. There will be improved ;destrian, bicy d trasi ers, and opportunities for healthy food access. The proposed �four goal and � y sec ' ns: + Buiddin ''te Design reate an environment that is conducive to increasing foot traffic, supportin rsifi " conomic development, and providing a safe, visually interesting and vibrant e ' ce for visitors and residents of the subarea. • Economic Devel ent & Redevedopment — Create strategies for developing new businesses using existing nassets, and promote land use strategies that provide opportunities for entrepreneurship and focus on retaining local businesses. • Bicycle & Pedestrian Mobility - Enhance community livability, health, and transportation in the subazea by providing a connected system of pedestrian and bicycle ways that is � integrated into the citywide and coordinated regional networks. • Healthy Eating & Food Access - Encourage existing businesses to provide healthy food options and improve access to healthier food choices. Expand opportunities to grow, market. distribute, and consume locally grown food. � , b_ .� � �..:, � ... � ar' . K:�Ptaoning Cp,�uni��ion�2011�hfeeting Su�m 02-01-12.dce �� EXHI.�� 3 111 PACE_� .__�F...�-- Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 February l, 2012 City staff suggests using a form-based code to achieve the vision. This "Form-Based Code" approach to community design will ensure development in the subarea provides amenities that are attainable and desired locally. Designing a form-based code is an intensive process and the city would need to have a goup dedicated to designing it. A form-based code is a rnore illustrative document that provides predicta.bility. It shows potential developers up-front what a building would be expected to look like. The meeting was opened for public comments. Lori DeYore, Realtor, Federal Way Chamber of Commerce Board of thanked the staff and city for their work and the opportunity to comm� the staff is open and responsive to the needs and wants of the comm plan provides what people want and that it will beautify the subare , provide safe streets for bicycles and pedestrians and will ease tr c i having been a part of the development of this plan. 4 ` ectors Chair — She is issue. She feels . She eels the proposed proposed plan will �,She is proud of -�r Thom MacFarlane — He also thanked the staff for the ess. e workshops well attended and generated a number of good ideas. He asked ho » is plan will occur. Also, he d discussion at the workshops in regards to green d ecifica ey water), but � g has been said this evening about incorporating green desi :� v � Sheryl Sanderson — She had attended th second workshop. ' sue that concerns her is calling the proposed subarea a destination locat e is concerned ' 1 lead to more people and traffic. She is also concerned that mixed- ' ically the mul ial aspect) will lower home values. , , Public comment was closed. Associ this plan will occur, there ' and City Council meeti nce a process and addition will be mention it, green design i f tt destination location, staff do location. An , ase th that proje �'an� d us � . In r eviden at mixed-use ad� Planner H er spon e issues raised. In regards to how ice for addit 1 public in during the City Council committee d, implemen ion would be through the zoning code amendment t during this ge, In regards to green design, while he did not ,o osed plan. In ds to the proposed subarea becoming a fro . e City Center being the city's main destination t occ Y y particular project would be mitigated as part of to mixed-use zoning, Associate Planner Herrera as not seen any ffe�ts property values. Commissi ong asked if opos�plan considers height increases. Associate Planner Herrera replied that i not specify � t increases. The plan identifies that mixed use development will require the nee height gr r than the 35-feet currently allowed. Height increases would require a zoning code amen . Sta.ff ommends, with community guidance, a desired height somewhere between 35 and 65 fe issioner O'Neil asked about many buildings and land is vacant. Associate Planner Herrera respon e does not have this information. Commissioner Medhurst asked if there are infill opportunities. Ass ` iate Planner Herrera replied not much. Parkin� lots might be infilled, but the city would have to change the parking code. Currently the number of parking stalls is based on the need for the day after Thanksgiving. One could ask does the city really need to plan to meet the need of one day. Commissioner Medhurst commented that on page 16 of the proposed plan it talks about exploring the use of zoning incentives. How would this work? Associate Planner Herrera stated that for example, the city could allow a building to increase their height if they include a roof-top garden, or a usable (with benches, etc.) plaza. Commissioner Long asked if the public would be able to comment on any proposed projects. Associate Planner Herrera commented that a number of the city's land use review process call for public EXt��'� 3 PAGE...�._...��. � comments. . . ...._ . �. , .� r� K:�Plarit�"Gommission�ZO11�MaeEin�Fua�mary 02-01-12.doc 112 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 February 1, 2012 Commissioner Bronson thanked the staff for their work and commented he supports the proposed plan, but he is concerned with the name. This area is not Twin Lakes. Associate Planner Herrera stated they heard the same complaint from the Twin Lakes Homeowners Association. T'he city chose the name Twin Lakes because many businesses in the area have Twin Lakes in their name (such as the Twin Lakes Post Office). At the request of the Twin Lakes HOA, staff attempted to differentiate the subarea from Twin Lakes proper by titling it the Twin Lakes Commercial District Subarea Plan. Staff did not hear much from anyone else regarding the use of Twin Lakes. There was additional discussion about form-based codes. Principal Planner Clark noted that the city would have to give direction for form-based codes to be used. ��`�;�� Commissioner Long moved (and it was secondec� to recommend Commercial District Subarea Plan as presented. There was no fiu unanimously. The public hearing was closed. r ADDITIONAL BUSINESS The next Planning Commission meeting has been res� Hylebos Conference Room (located next to the Council An� The K:�Planning Commission�201 I�Meeting Summary 02-01-12.doc to the proposed Twin Lakes �. The motion carried 22, 2012, at . .m. in the EX�!��' 3 ��3 pAGE.. 5...4�. �._ COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 21, 2012 ITEM #: SUB.TECT: S 344`" Way @ Weyerhaeuser Way S Intersection Improvements — 85% Design Status Report POLICY QUESTION Should the Council authorize staff to proceed with design of the S 344`�' Way @ Weyerhaeuser Way S Intersection Improvements Project and return to the LUTC and Council at the 100% design completion for further reports and authorization? CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL COMMITTEE Land Use and Transportation Committee CATEGORY: � Consent A ■ Ordinance ❑ City Council Business ResoluNon MEETING DATE February 13 , 2012 ❑ Public Hearing ❑ Other STAFF REPOR'r BY: John Mulke , P. E., Street Systems Project �� DEPT.. Public_ Works ____ _ .......... . __ __ .............................. . ....... ._... . ._..................... .... ... .Y . Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated February 13, 2012. Options Considered: l. Authorize staff to proceed with the design of the S 344`" Way @ Weyerhaeuser Way S Intersection Improvements Project and return to the LUTC and Council at the 100% design completion stage for further reports and authorization. 2. Do not authorize staff to proceed with finalizing the present design of this project and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the February 21 2012 City Council Consent Agenda for approval. Q MAYOR APPROVAL: ��K� ___ _ __,._ _._ _ DIRECTOR APPROVAL: / ..__.»..., r�,.....,.:i ommittee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Forward Option 1 to the February 21, 2012 City Council Consent Agenda for approval. Bob Celski, Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION "1 move to authorize staff to proceed with the design of the S 344`" Way @ Weyerhaeuser Way S Intersection Improvements Project and return to the LUTC and Council at the 100% design completion stage for further reports and authorization. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BYCITYCLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED 1� reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION # 114 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM 0 DATE: 1 �1� February 13, 2012 Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: Skip Priest, Mayor FROM• �'� Cary M. Roe, P.E., Director of Parks, Public Works and Emergency Management �'� ' John Mulkey, P.E., Street Systems Project Engineer -S�u^ SUBJECT: S 344`� Way @ Weyerhaeuser Way S Intersection Improvements — 85% Design Status BACKGROUND This project will construct a two-lane roundabout at this intersection. The purpose of the project is to improve traffic safety and capacity and reduce accidents by eliminating conflicts. The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. Currently, the project design is approximately 85% complete, which includes the following completed tasks: • The Topographical Surveys • The Geotechnical Investigation • Right of Way Plan � Channelization Plans • SEPA Approval • Project Design to 85% Ongoing Tasks Include: • Right of Way acquisition and/or dedication agreement • WSDOT approval of Channelization Plans • Project Design to 100% PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES: Design ROW Acquisition 2012 Construction Cost 10% Construction Contingency Construc Management TOTAL PROJECT COSTS AVAILABLE FUNDING: Budgeted City Funds Mitigation Interest Earning TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET $ 269,000 40,000 1,200,000 120,000 120,000 $1,749,000 $1,034,000 $0 0 $1,034,000 At this time the project budget has a funding shortfall of $715,OU0. As we proceed with the project design and right of way acquisition process, the total project costs will be refined and presented to the Committee and Council at the 100% design completion status report for further action. 115 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 21, 2011 ITEM #: SUB.TECT: 10�' Avenue SW at SW Campus Drive Intersection Improvements — 85% Design Status Report POLICY QUESTION Should the Council authorize staff to proceed with design of the 10`" Avenue SW at SW Campus Drive Intersection Improvements Project and return to the LUTC and Council at the 100% design completion for further reports and authorization? CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL COMMITTEE Land Use and Transportation Committee CATEGORY: � Consent A ■ Ordinance � City Council Business Resolution MEETING DATE February 13 , 2012 . ■ Public Hearing Other —_ STAFF REPORT BY: John Mulkey P. E., Street Systems Project En�ineer_� _ w ` DEP'r: _Public Works ___ ___ _ Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated February 13, 2012 Options Considered: 1. Authorize staff to proceed with the design of the 10`� Avenue SW at SW Campus Drive Intersection Improvements Project and return to the LUTC and Council at the 100% design completion stage for further reports and authorization. 2. Do not authorize staff to proceed with finalizing the present design of this project and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the Febnxary 21, 2012 City Council Consent Agenda for approvaL :(� MAYOR APPROVAL: �� DIRECTOR APPROVAL: �;�/ C mittee Council Committee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Forward Option 1 to the February 21, 2012 City Council Consent Agenda for approval. Bob Celski, Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION "I move to authorize staff to proceed with the design of the 10` Avenue SW at SW Campus Drive Intersection Improvements Project and return to the L UTC and Council at the 100% design completion stage for further reports and authorization. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED 1sT reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION # 116 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: February 13, 2012 TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: Skip Priest, Mayor �� Cary M. Roe, P.E., Director of Parks, Public Works and Emergency Management FROM: John Mulkey, P.E., Street Systems Project Engineer 5��1 SUBJECT: 10`�' Avenue SW at SW Campus Drive Intersection Improvements — 85% Design Status Report BACKGROUND This project will construct a 300-foot long right-turn lane on southbound 10`�' Avenue SW approaching the intersection of SW Caxnpus Drive. Additional work will include utility relocation, storm drainage, paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, traffic signal modifications, signing, channelization and landscaping. The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. Currently, the project design is approximately 30% complete, which includes the following completed tasks: • The Topographical Surveys • The Geotechnical Investigation • Right of Way Plan • Channelization Plans • SEPA Approval • Project Design to 85% Ongoing Tasks Include: • Right of Way acquisition and/or dedication agreement • Project Design to 100% PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES: Design ROW Acquisition 2012 Construction Cost 10% Construction Contingency Constnxction Management TOTAL PROJECT COSTS AVAILABLE FUNDING: Budgeted City Funds Mitigation Interest Earning TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET $145,400 64,000 700,000 70,000 84,400 $1,063,800 0.00 $183,000 26,700 $ 209,700 This project has funding for Design and right of way acquisition only thru available project mitigation and interest funding; no construction funding is budgeted at this time. 117 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 21, 2012 ITEM #: SUB.TECT: 21 Avenue SW at SW 336` St Intersection — 30% Design Status Report -_ POLICY QUESTION Should the Council authorize staff to proceed with design of the 21 Avenue SW at SW 336 Street Intersection Project and return to the LUTC and Council at the 85% design completion for further reports and authorization? CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL COMMITTEE Land Use and Transportation Committee CATEGORY: � Consent ❑ City Council Business ■ ■ Ordinance Resolution MEETING DATE February 13 , 2012 ■ ■ Public Hearing Other STAFF REPORT BY: John Mulke , P. E., Street Systems Project Engineer_ -�`� DEPT: Public Works ___ _ _ .. :. ............................ _._.... � ................................. .. ....Y.. ............ Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated February 13, 2012. O tions Considered: _P ................._.._....._.................._..._....._.__........................._. . _..._........ ........................._._..._............._.__.....__.............__ _......__..................... .. ............... ................................... _... _...... .................. _.. 1. Authorize staff to proceed with the design of the 21S` Avenue SW at SW 336 St Intersection Project an return to the LUTC and Council at the 85% design completion stage for further reports and authorization. 2. Do not authorize staff to proceed with finalizing the present design of this project and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the February 21 2012 City Council Consent Agenda for approval.� (� � MAYOR APPROVAL: _-C'� / DIRECTOR APPROVAL: � mm�itte� Council omm�ttee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Forward Option 1 to the February 21, 2012City Council Consent Agenda for approval. Bob Celski, Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION "1 move to authorize staff to proceed with the design of the 21 Ave SW at SW 336`" Street Intersection Project and return to the LUTC and Council at the 85% design completion stage for further reports and authorization. " , (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED lsr reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUT[ON # 118 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: VIA: e{ FROM: � SUBJECT: February 13, 2012 Land Use and Transportation Committee Skip Priest, Mayor �,,�. Cary M. Roe, P.E., Director of Parks, Public Works and Emergency Management John Mulkey, P.E., Street Systems Project Engineer -5 (Lv^ 21 Avenue SW at SW 336`�' St Intersection — 30% Design Status Report BACKGROUND On November 15, 2011, the City Council reviewed design alternatives for this project and selected the traditional intersection improvement alternative of constructing dual left-turn lanes eastbound and westbound and a right—turn lane westbound. This project will include access control along SW 336`� Street and also install a new traffic signal west of the intersection to allow for left turn access into the businesses north and south of the roadway. Additional work will include utility relocation, storm drainage, paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, signing, channelization, and landscaping. The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. Currently, the project design is approximately 30% complete, which includes the following completed tasks: • The Topographical Surveys • Right of Way Plan • Channelization Plans • Project Design to 30% • lst Project Open house Ongoing Tasks Include: • SEPA Submittals • Value Engineering Study • Right of Way Requirements (Property Appraisals, Review Appraisals, Negotiation and Acquisition) � 2 project Open house scheduled for July 2012 • Preliminary Contract Specifications • Project Design to 85% PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES: Design ROW Acquisition 2012 Construction Cost 10% Construction Contingency Construction Management TOTAL PROJECT COSTS AVAILABLE FUNDING: TIB Grant Budgeted City Funds Mitigation TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET $ 600,000 650,000 3,300,000 330,000 435,000 $ 5,315,000 $ 3,360,000 1,859,000 ,1Q�,527 $ 5,328,527