LUTC PKT 07-02-2012MEETING AGENDA
Website
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes)
3. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
City of Federal Way
Action
City Council
Topic
Land Use/Transportation Committee
Presenter
Page
July 2, 2012 City Hall
5:30 .m. Council Chambers
Date
Time
MEETING AGENDA
Website
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes)
3. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
4. OTHER
5. FUTURE MEETINGS/AGENDA ITEMS:
The next LUTC meeting is scheduled for Monday, August 6, 2012 at 5:30 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers.
6. ADJOURN
Committee Members City staff
Bob Ce/ski, Chair Cary M. Roe, P.E., Director of Parks, Public Wonts and Emergency Management
Jeanne Burbidge, Member Darien LeMaster, Administrative Assistant 11
Susan Honda, Member 253-835-2701
G I LUTCI LUTCAgendas and Summaries 201217-02-2011 LUTCAgenda.dbc
Action
Council
Topic
Title/ Description
Presenter
Page
or Info
Date
Time
A.
Approval of Minutes: June 4, 2012
LeMaster
2
Action
N/A
5 min.
B.
S 344th Way at Weyerhaeuser Way S Intersection
Mulkey
5
Action
July 17, 2012
5 min.
Improvements - 100% Design Status Report
Consent
C.
10th Ave SW at SW Campus Drive Intersection
Mulkey
7
Action
July 17, 2012
5 min.
Improvements — 100% Design Status Report
Consent
D.
Acceptance of Grant Funding for Transportation
Perez
9
Action
July 17, 2012
5 min.
Improvement Projects
Consent
E.
Selection Process — 2012 Code Amendments
Clark
14
Action
July 17, 2012
5 min.
Business
F.
Selection Process — 2012 Comprehensive Plan
Clark
19
Action
July 17, 2012
10 min.
Amendments
Business
4. OTHER
5. FUTURE MEETINGS/AGENDA ITEMS:
The next LUTC meeting is scheduled for Monday, August 6, 2012 at 5:30 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers.
6. ADJOURN
Committee Members City staff
Bob Ce/ski, Chair Cary M. Roe, P.E., Director of Parks, Public Wonts and Emergency Management
Jeanne Burbidge, Member Darien LeMaster, Administrative Assistant 11
Susan Honda, Member 253-835-2701
G I LUTCI LUTCAgendas and Summaries 201217-02-2011 LUTCAgenda.dbc
City of Federal Way
City Council
Land Use and Transportation Committee
June 4, 2012 City Hall
5:30 PM City Council Chambers
MEETING SUMMARY
Committee Members in Attendance: Committee Chair Bob Celski, Committee member Jeanne Burbidge and
Committee member Susan Honda
Staff in Attendance: Director of Parks, Public Works and Emergency Management Cary Roe, Deputy Public Works
Director Marwan Salloum, Deputy Public Works Director Ken Miller, Surface Water Manager Will Appleton, City
Traffic Engineer Rick Perez, Street Systems Project Engineer John Mulkey, Surface Water Project Engineer Fei Tang,
Assistant City Attorney Peter Beckwith, and Administrative Assistant II Darlene LeMaster.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Committee Chair Celski called the meeting to order at 5:30 PM.
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
There was one public comment:
Nancy Combs, 30441 21" Ave SW, Federal Way — Ms. Combs shared how unhappy she with the City
Councilmembers for not supporting her NTS petition. Ms. Combs shared a letter of support for the petition
from the principal of Adelaide Elementary School.
3. BUSINESS ITEMS
Forward
Topic Title/Description to Council
A. Approval of the May 7, 2012 LUTC Minutes
Committee approved the May 7, 2012 LUTC minutes as presented.
Moved: Burbidge Seconded: Honda Passed: Unanimously; 3-0
B. S 356`h Street Regional Detention Facility Retrofit Project — Preliminary Design Status
Surface Water Project Engineer Fei Tang presented information on this item. There was no
public comment.
Mr. Tang clarified that there are no estimated property costs associated with this project because
the City already owns the land. Chair Celski asked if having the pond adjacent to the road
would have any negative effects to the road or the pond. Mr. Tang stated that the pond will be
designed to filter pollutants from either the road or the infiltration system.
Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented.
Moved: Burbidge Seconded: Honda Passed: Unanimously; 3-0
N/A
June 19, 201:
Consent
Land Use/Transportation Committee Page 2 June 4, 2012
C.
D.
E.
F.
Neighborhood Traffic Safety (NTS) Project Bid Award June 19, 201,
Consent
City Traffic Engineer Rick Perez presented information on this item. There was no public
comment.
Committee member Honda asked if the increase contract amount (in addition to the budgeted
amount) was to pay for locations that have already been chosen. Mr. Perez answered that the
request was to error on the side of caution and to be able to accommodate additional qualifying
requests that staff may receive beyond the allotted budged amount. Staff has no currently
approved installations.
Committee member Burbidge asked if staff had any prior work experience with Northwest
Asphalt, Inc. Mr. Perez stated that the City has not yet worked with Northwest Asphalt, Inc., but
that their references were appropriate.
Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented.
Moved: Burbidge Seconded: Honda Passed: Unanimously; 3-0
Lakota Middle School Safe Routes to School Project — 85% Design Status Report June 19, 201:
Consent
Streets Systems Project Engineer John Mulkey presented information on this item. There was
no public comment.
Committee Member Honda asked if the project began the day after the last day of school in
2013, would the project be done before the start of the following school year. Mr. Mulkey
responded that the majority of the project work would be complete. By chance the project was
not complete; the road would have been widened and would be able to accommodate the traffic
needs until the project was finalized.
Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented.
Moved: Burbidge Seconded: Honda Passed: Unanimously; 3-0
SW 312th Street —14`h Ave SW to Dash Point Road Improvement Project — 85% Design June 19, 201:
Status Report Consent
Streets Systems Project Engineer John Mulkey presented information on this item. There was
no public comment or discussion.
Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented.
Moved: Burbidge Seconded: Honda Passed: Unanimously; 3-0
Grant Funding for Transportation Improvement Projects — Authorization to Submit an June 19, 201,
Application Consent
City Traffic Engineer Rick Perez presented information on this item. There was no public
comment. Committee member Burbidge asked if this would be the first traversable roundabout
in Federal Way. Mr. Perez said that yes, this would be the first roundabout of this design in our
city. The design is such that it can accommodate very large vehicles, garbage trucks, etc. that
would use this route. The design has performed very well in other applications.
Committee member Honda asked if staff had talked to the school district about installing this
type of roundabout. Mr. Perez said the school district thought that this particular roundabout
had the most forgiving design.
G:\LUTC,LUTC Agendas and Summaries 2012\6-04-12 Minutes.doc
Land Use/Transportation Committee Page 3 June 4, 2012
Chair Celski shared concerns that this type of low profile roundabouts may not be adequate to
control the driving speeds of young drivers. Committee member Burbidge suggested having
more distinctive markings on the roundabout.
Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented.
Moved: Burbidge Seconded: Honda Passed: Unanimously; 3-0
G. Setting Public Hearing for 2013-2018 Transportation Improvement Plan
City Traffic Engineer Rick Perez presented information on this item. There was no public
comment or discussion.
Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented.
Moved: Burbidge Seconded: Honda Passed: Unanimously; 3-0
H. 2013-2018 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City Traffic Engineer Rick Perez presented information on this item. There was no public
comment.
Committee member Honda asked if the driveway to the Wynstone neighborhood would include
a traffic signal. Mr. Perez responded that the traffic analysis suggested that a traffic signal was
not warranted.
Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented.
Moved: Burbidge Seconded: Honda Passed: Unanimously; 3-0
4. OTHER
None.
5. FUTURE MEETING
The next LUTC meeting will be Monday, July 2, 2012 at 5:30 PM in City Hall Council Chambers.
6. ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 6:15 PM.
COMMITTEE APPROVAL:
Bob Celski, Chair
G:\LUTC\LUTC Agendas and Summaries 2012\6-04-12 Minutes.doc
Attest:
June 19, 201,'
Consent
July 3, 2012
Public
Hearing
Darlene LeMaster, Administrative Assistant II
Jeanne Burbidge, Member
4
Susan Honda, Member
SUBJECT: S 344`x' Way @ Weyerhaeuser Way S Intersection Improvements —100% Design Status Report
POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council direct staff not to move forward with the S 344' Way @ Weyerhaeuser Way S
Intersection Improvements Project and return to the Council when funding becomes available for further reports and
authorization?
COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012
CATEGORY:
® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing
❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY: John Mulkey, , P. E., Street Systems Project Engineer 50"v DEPT: Public Works
._..........................................................................._...................................._....._........_............y....._......................_.__......__.......................................................__.......- _ --
Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated July 2, 2012.
Options Considered:
1. Direct staff not to move forward with property acquisition and construction of the S 344' Way @ Weyerhaeuser
Way S Intersection Improvements Project, and return to the LUTC Committee when additional project funding
becomes available for further reports and authorization.
2. Direct staff to acquire the necessary property and not move forward with the project.
3. Provide further direction to staff.
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the July 17, 2012 City Council
Consent Agenda for approval.
MAYOR APPROVAL: / Y//12_.. _...__ DIRECTOR APPROVAL:y'' �_
fodAttee Council Committee Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Forward Option 1 to the July 17, 2012 City Council Consent Agenda for
approval.
Bob Celski, Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to direct staff not to move forward with property acquisition and
construction of the S 344th Way @ Weyerhaeuser Way S Intersection Improvements Project, and return to the
LUTC Committee when additional project funding becomes available for further reports and authorization. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1sT reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION #
5
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 2, 2012
TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee
VIA: Skip Priest, Mayor ,,^
FROM: Cary M. Roe, P.E., Director of Parks, Public Works and Emergency Management�0 ,
John Mulkey, P.E., Street Systems Project Engineer �� vtA
SUBJECT: S 344th Way @ Weyerhaeuser Way S Intersection Improvements — 100% Design Status
BACKGROUND:
This project will construct a two-lane roundabout at this intersection. The purpose of the project is to
improve traffic safety and capacity and reduce accidents by eliminating conflicts.
The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. Currently, the project
design is 100% complete.
Tasks Not Completed:
• Right of Way acquisition and/or dedication agreement for partial take on two parcels.
PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES:
Design $ 269,000
ROW Acquisition 40,000
2012 Construction Cost 1,200,000
10% Construction Contingency 120,000
Construction Management 120,000
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $1,749,000
AVAILABLE FUNDING:
Budgeted City Funds $1,034,000
Mitigation 0
Interest Earning 0
TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET
$1,034,000
At this time the project budget has a funding shortfall of $715,000 for construction of the project. Right
of way acquisition was not attained due to a property owner (Weyerhaeuser) objection to the timing of the
project. Staff is seeking to shelve the project until such time as additional funds become available for
construction and/or private development required to complete the project, at which time staff will pursue
the needed acquisition of Right of Way.
6
SUBJECT: 101h Avenue SW at SW Campus Drive Intersection Improvements —100% Design Status Report
POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council direct staff not to move forward with the 10th Avenue SW at SW Campus
Drive Intersection Improvements Project and return to the Council when funding becomes available for further reports
and authorization?
COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012
CATEGORY:
® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing
❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY: John Mulkey, P. E., Street Systems Project Engineer � _ DEPT: Public Works
................ ..............._.............................. _....................... ......_..._...................... ... .....
Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated July 2, 2012
Options Considered:
1. Direct staff not to move forward with property acquisition and construction of the 10`h Avenue SW at SW
Campus Drive Intersection Improvements Project, and return to the LUTC Committee when additional project
funding becomes available for further reports and authorization.
2. Direct staff to acquire the necessary property and not move forward with the project.
3. Provide further direction to staff.
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the July 17, 2012 City Council
Consent Agenda for approval.
MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
tte Council omminee Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Forward Option 1 to the July 17, 2012 City Council Consent Agenda for
approval.
Bob Celski, Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to direct staff not to move forward with property acquisition and
construction of the I e Avenue SW at SW Campus Drive Intersection Improvements Project, and return to the
LUTC Committee when additional project funding becomes available for further reports and authorization. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1ST reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION #
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 2, 2012
TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee
VIA: Skip Priest, Mayor
FROM: Cary M. Roe, P.E., Director of Parks, Public Works and Emergency Managemen��
John Mulkey, P.E., Street Systems Project Engineer 15dtt
SUBJECT: 10'h Avenue SW at SW Campus Drive Intersection Improvements —100% Design Status Report
BACKGROUND:
This project will construct a 300 -foot long right -turn lane on southbound 10`x' Avenue SW approaching the
intersection of SW Campus Drive. Additional work will include utility relocation, storm drainage, paving, curb,
gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, traffic signal modifications, signing, channelization and landscaping.
The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. Currently, the project design is
100% complete.
Tasks Not Completed:
• Right of Way acquisition and/or dedication agreement for one partial take within the project
limits
PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES:
Design $145,400
ROW Acquisition 64,000
2012 Construction Cost 750,000
10% Construction Contingency 75,000
Construction Management 93,750
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $1,128,550
AVAILABLE FUNDING:
Budgeted City Funds 0.00
Mitigation $183,000
Interest Earning 26,700
TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET $ 209,700
This project has funding for Design and right of way acquisition only thru available project mitigation and
interest funding; no construction funding is budgeted at this time. Right of Way acquisition was not attained
due to lack of response form the property owner. Staff is seeking to shelve the project until such time as
additional funds become available for construction, at which time staff will pursue the acquisition of Right of
Way and the start of the construction phase.
8
SUBJECT: Washington State Department of Transportation — City Safety Grants Acceptance
POLICY QUESTION: Should City Council authorize staff to accept grant funding for three grants to improve safety
at signalized intersections?
COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee
CATEGORY:
® Consent
❑ Ordinance
MEETING DATE: July 02, 2012
❑ Public Hearing
❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY: Rick Perez, P.E., Cit Traffic En ineer DEPT: Public Works
......................_............................._........_ ......_....................._.........._..................................................................................._Y................_....................................._ _..
Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated July 02, 2012.
Options Considered:
1. Authorize staff to accept the grant funding under the Washington State Department of Transportation
City Safety Program for safety improvements within the City of Federal Way.
2. Do not accept the grant funding under the Washington State Department of Transportation City Safety
Program for safety improvements within the City of Federal Way.
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the July 17, 2012 City Council
Consent Agenda for approval.
MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: �I/L M
omnuttee Council Committae Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Forward Option I to the July 17, 2012 City Council Consent Agenda for
approval.
Bob Celski, Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to authorize staff to accept the grant funding under the Washington
State Department of Transportation City Safety Program for safety improvements within the City of Federal
Way. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1ST reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED -08/12/2010 RESOLUTION #
9
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 02, 2011
TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee
VIA: Skip Priest, Mayor
FROM: Cary M. Roe, P.E., Director of Parks, Public Works and Emergency ManagementooA
Rick Perez, P. E., City Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: WSDOT City Safety Grants Acceptance
BACKGROUND:
This memorandum provides the Council with the current status of the Washington State Department of
Transportation City Safety grant applications submitted in October 2011 as well as anticipated matching
funds.
The WSDOT has approved three of the four applications which were submitted per City Council
authorization at the October 18, 2011 City Council meeting.
The projects consist of conversions to flashing yellow arrow displays, installation of reflective backplates,
installation of overhead lane use control signs over drop lanes, and installation of programmed visibility
heads where driver confusion has been observed. For the Citywide grant, these improvements would be
installed based on a ranking of collision severity rates at intersections until funding is fully used.
cc: Project File
Day File
10
Estimated
Grant
City
Funding Agency Project Title
Project Cost
Fund
Match
Washington State Department of Transportation
$174,000
$174,000
$0
• SR 99 — S 3200' St to S 3300' St
Washington State Department of Transportation
$258,600
$258,600
$0
• S 3200i St — SR 99 to I-5
Washington State Department of Transportation
$350,000
$350,000
$0
• Citywide Safety Improvements
The projects consist of conversions to flashing yellow arrow displays, installation of reflective backplates,
installation of overhead lane use control signs over drop lanes, and installation of programmed visibility
heads where driver confusion has been observed. For the Citywide grant, these improvements would be
installed based on a ranking of collision severity rates at intersections until funding is fully used.
cc: Project File
Day File
10
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Federal Way,
Washington, authorizing execution of Local Agency Agreement with
Washington State Department of Transportation regarding
improvement of the 2012 City Safety Program in the city of Federal
Way, Washington....
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way applied for several 2012 City Safety Program grants
from the Washington State Department of Transportation for the purpose of design and construction
of Safety Improvements Projects within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation agrees to grant the City of
Federal Way estimated federal funds in three separate grants in the total amount of Seven Hundred
Eighty -Two Thousand Six Hundred and no/100 Dollars ($782,600) provided that the City Council
authorizes the Mayor to enter into the Local Agency Agreements; and
WHEREAS, by accepting said grant the City of Federal Way agrees to execute the Local
Agency Agreements;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Execution of Acceptance of the Local Agency Agreement. The Mayororhis
designee is hereby authorized to execute the Local Agency Agreements regarding improvements
identified in the 2012 City Safety Program in the city of Federal Way.
Resolution No. 12 -
11
Page I of 3
Rev 1/10
Section 2. Receipt of Federal Funds. The Mayor or his designee is hereby authorized to
receive the state and federal funds estimated to be Seven Hundred Eighty -Two Thousand Six
Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($782,600).
Section 3. Matching Funds. Pursuant to the terms of the Local Agency Agreement, the
City is not required to commit matching funds.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution
should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity
or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause or phrase of this resolution.
Section 5. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this resolution are authorized
to make necessary corrections to this resolution including, but not limited to, the correction of
scrivener/clerical errors, references, resolution numbering, section/subsection numbers and any
references thereto.
Section 6. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective
date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 7. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage
by the Federal Way City Council.
Resolution No. 12 -
12
Page 2 of 3
Rev 1/10
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON this day of July, 2012
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, SKIP PRIEST
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, CAROL MCNEILLY, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.:
Resolution No. 12 -
13
Page 3 of 3
Rev 1/10
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 17, 2012 ITEM #:
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: Selection Process — 2012 Amendments to the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC)
POLICY QUESTION: Should the citizen -initiated request to allow senior housing with an assisted living
component be allowed in the Professional Office (PO) zone?
COMMITTEE: Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012
CATEGORY:
Consent ❑ Ordinance ® Public Hearing
❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY: Principal Planner Margaret Clark DEPT: Community & Economic Development T
Attachments: June 26, 2012, Staff Report to the LUTC with Exhibit A.
Background: The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) requires the city to accept applications for amendments
to the FWRC on an annual basis. The city received one request in February 2012, which was after the September
306' deadline for accepting applications. However, pursuant to FWRC 19.08.050, the City Council may, at its
discretion, accept requests at any time of the year. Per FWRC 19.80.080, after consideration by the LUTC, the
City Council shall hold a public hearing and select those docketed amendment requests it wishes to move to the
Planning Commission for further consideration.
Options Considered: 1) Concur with the Mayor's recommendation; 2) Do not concur with the Mayor's
recommendation.
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: That the amendment request goes forward for further consideration.
MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
Council ommittee Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the Mayor's recommendation to the July 17, 2012, City
Council meeting for a public hearing.
Bob Celski, Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the Mayor's recommendation. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1sT reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED -0&/12/2010 RESOLUTION #
KA2012 Code Amendments\Senior Housing in PO Zone\Selection Process\LUTC\Agenda Bill-doc
14
40k
CITY OF 40':t��
Federal Way
DATE: June 26, 2012
TO: Bob Celski, Chair
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC)
FROM: Patrick Doherty, Director of Community and Economic Development
Margaret H. Clark, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: Selection Process — 2012 Code Amendments
MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012
I. POLICY QUESTION
Should the citizen -initiated request to allow senior housing with an assisted living component be
allowed in the Professional Office (PO) zone?
II. BACKGROUND
The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) requires the city to accept applications for amendments
to the FWRC on an annual basis. The city received one request in February 2012, which was after
the September 30`' deadline for accepting applications. However, pursuant to FWRC 19.08.050,
the City Council may, at its discretion, accept requests at any time of the year. Per FWRC
19.80.080, after consideration by the Land Use Transportation Committee (LUTC), the City
Council shall hold a public hearing and select those docketed amendment requests it wishes to
move to the Planning Commission for further consideration.
III. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Ron Mitchell with Safety Senior contacted city staff about locating a senior housing project
consisting of 50 to 70 units on property zoned Professional Office (PO) located at 31919 6''
Avenue South. Senior housing is not an allowable use in this zone. Staff considered whether this
site was a candidate for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone to Office Park (OP), which
does allow senior housing. However, since the OP zone allows a wide range of uses as shown in
Exhibit A, the OP zone designation did not appear to be an appropriate one for this location due to
its proximity to single family residential zoning.
IV. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY FOR CODE AMENDMENT SELECTION PROCESS
July 2, 2012 LUTC Meeting The request will be presented to the LUTC for a
recommendation on whether it should be considered further.
July 17 2012 City Council Public Hearing — The City Council shall determine whether the
request should be considered further.
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012
Selection Process — Code Amendments 15 Page 1 of 3
V. SELECTION CRITERIA
FWRC 19.80.080 contains criteria for selecting amendments for further consideration.
A. Criterion #1— Whether the same area or issue was studied during the last amendment process
and conditions in the immediate vicinity have significantly changed so as to make the
requested change within the public interest.
Response to Criterion #1— A request to allow senior housing in the PO zone was not studied
during the last amendment process, or during any previous amendment cycle.
B. Criterion #2 — The proposed amendment is consistent with the overall vision of the
comprehensive plan.
Response to Criterion #2 — The request to allow senior housing in the PO zone is consistent
with the city's economic development policy to work with the private sector to actively bring
in new development, businesses, and jobs to the community (EDP10). In addition, senior
housing would be compatible with already allowable uses such as office, schools, and
governmental facilities in the PO zone.
C. Criterion #3 — Whether the proposed amendment meets the existing state and local laws,
including the GMA.
Response to Criterion #3 — The proposed amendment to allow senior housing in the PO zone
is not in conflict with local or state laws and meets the Growth Management Act's mandate to
make adequate provisions for existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the
community (RCW 36.70A.070[2][d]). Additional senior housing will fill the need generated
by the aging baby boomers that are presently turning 65 at the rate of approximately 10,000
per day nationwide.
D. Criterion #4 — In the case of text amendments, or other amendments to goals or policies,
whether the request benefits the city as a whole versus a selected group.
Response to Criterion #4 — A code amendment to allow senior housing in the PO zone would
benefit the city as a whole as it may allow development of vacant land in the PO zone for
senior housing as there does not presently appear to be a high demand for additional office
space. As of June 2010, the City of Federal Way had approximately 750,000 square feet of
vacant office space out of a total of approximately three million square feet.'
If the request meets the criteria set forth in subsections above, it shall be further evaluated
according to the following criteria:
E. Criterion #1— Whether the proposed amendment can be incorporated into planned or active
projects.
Response to Criterion #1— This request can be incorporated into the 2012 Planning
Commission Work Program.
Source: officespace.com
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012
Selection Process — Code Amendments 16 Page 2 of 3
F. Criterion #2 — Amount of analysis necessary to reach a recommendation on the request. If a
large-scale study is required, a request may have to be delayed until the following year due to
workload, staffing levels, etc.
Response to Criterion #2 — This request does not require a large-scale study.
G. Criterion #3 — Volume of requests received. A large volume of requests may necessitate that
some requests be reviewed in a subsequent year.
Response to Criterion #3 — This was the only citizen -initiated request received for this year's
work program.
H. Criterion #4 — Order of requests received.
Response to Criterion #4 — This was the only request received.
VI. COUNCIL ACTION
Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080(4), the City Council shall determine whether this request should be
further considered, and if so, shall forward it to the Planning Commission for review and
recommendation. The council's decision whether to consider a proposed amendment shall not
constitute a decision or recommendation that the proposed amendment should be adopted, nor
does it preclude later council action to add an amendment for consideration.
VII. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION
The Mayor recommends that the LUTC forward the proposed amendment request to the City
Council for further consideration.
VIII. LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The LUTC forwards the recommendation to the full Council as follows:
a) That the request go forward for further consideration.
b) That the request not go forward for further consideration.
APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT:
Bob Celski, Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member
K:\2012 Code Amendments\Senior Housing in PO Zone\Selection Process\LUTC\Staff Report to the LUTC.doc
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012
Selection Process — Code Amendments 17 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT A
USES ALLOWED IN THE OFFICE PARK (OP) ZONE
• Office
• Banking and related financial services
• Retail sales of grocery, produce, and related items
• Retail establishment providing office supplies, printing, and duplicating
• Restaurant (50 seats maximum)
• Commercial recreation facility
• Commercial/industrial photography, cinematography, video production, broadcast studio
• Newspaper printing plant
• Research, development, & testing facility, including electronics technology & dental lab
• Accessory warehouse facility
• Convention, conference, and trade centers associated with other permitted use
• School, college, university, business, or vocational school
• Day care facilities, except Class II Home Occupations
• Hospital, convalescent center, nursing home
• Funeral home, mortuary
• Government facility
• Public park
• Public transit shelter
• Public utility
• Personal wireless service facility
KA2012 Code Amendments\Senior Housing in PO Zone\Selection Process\LUTC\EXHIBIT A.doc
18
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 17, 2012 ITEM #:
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: Selection Process — 2012 Amendments to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP)
POLICY QUESTION: Which of the citizen -initiated site-specific requests for comprehensive plan amendments should
City of Federal Way staff research further?
COMMITTEE: Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012
CATEGORY:
❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ® Public Hearing
❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other
STAFF REPORT BY: Principal Planner Margaret Clark DEPT: Community & Economic Development
Attachments: June 25, 2012, Staff Report to the LUTC with Exhibits A —G.
Background: The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) requires the city to accept applications for amendments to the
Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) on an annual basis. The city received the following three citizen -initiated
requests for site-specific c comprehensive plan amendments in September 2012: 1) request from Edward Hoit for a
comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.82 acres (parcel #112103-9131) located to the west of Dumas Bay Park
from Single Family — Low Density Residential and Suburban Estates (SE, one unit per five acres) to Single Family —
Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet); 2) request from Mark Barrett for
a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 0.35 acres (parcel #785360-0008) located at 1836 South 308`h Street from
Single Family — High Density Residential and RS 7.2 (Single Family, one unit per 7,200 square feet) to Multiple Family
Residential and RM 3600 (Multi -Family, one unit per 3,600 square feet); and 3) request from Isaac Hildebrandt for a
comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.18 acres (parcel #292104-9071) located at 1320 South 359`h Street from
Single Family — Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet) to Multiple
Family Residential and RM 2400 (Multi -Family, one unit per 2,400 square feet). Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080, after the
deadline for accepting applications and following an LUTC recommendation, the City Council shall hold a public hearing
and select those docketed amendment requests it wishes to move to the Planning Commission for further consideration.
Options Considered: 1) Concur with the _Mayor's recommendation; 2 D not concur with the Mayor's recommendation.
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: That Site -Specific Requests #1 and 3 not be considered further because they are not
consistent with the comprehensive plan. That Site -Specific Request #2 goes forward for further consideration.
MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
ommlttCouncil
Council
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the Mayor's recommendation to the July 17, 2012, City Council
meeting for a public hearing.
Bob Celski, Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member
PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the Mayor's recommendation. "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
❑ DENIED 1ST reading
❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
REVISED -08/12/2010 19 RESOLUTION #
K:\Comprehensive Plan\2012 Comprehensive Plan\Selection Process\LUTC\Agenda Bill.doc
44k
CITY OF
Federal Way
DATE: June 25, 2012
TO: Bob Celski, Chair
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC)
FROM: Patrick Doherty, Director of Community and Economic Development
Margaret H. Clark, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: Selection Process — 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012
I. POLICY QUESTION
Which of the citizen -initiated site-specific requests for comprehensive plan amendments should
City of Federal Way staff research further?
II. BACKGROUND
The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) requires the city to accept applications for amendments
to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) text and map on an annual basis. The city
received three requests in September 2011.
Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080, after the September 30`h deadline for accepting applications and
following an LUTC recommendation, the City Council shall hold a public hearing and select
those docketed amendment requests it wishes to move to the Planning Commission for further
consideration.
M. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
Changes and updates to the comprehensive plan are divided into text changes to chapters of the
comprehensive plan and requests for changes to comprehensive plan designations and zoning for
specific parcels, which would result in changes to the Comprehensive Plan Map and Official
Zoning Map.
Following is a summary of the three citizen -initiated comprehensive plan amendments received in
September 2011 (2012 Comprehensive Plan Update).
2012 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS (Exhibit A — Composite Map)
(i) File No. 11 -103859 -UP — Request from Edward Hoit for a comprehensive plan amendment
and rezone of 1.82 acres (parcel #112103-9131) located to the west of Dumas Bay Park from
Single Family — Low Density Residential and Suburban Estates (SE, one unit per five acres)
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012
Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments 20 Page I of 8
to Single Family — Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per
15,000 square feet) (Exhibit B — Vicinity Map).
(ii) File No. 11 -103895 -UP — Request from Mark Barrett for a comprehensive Elan amendment
and rezone of 0.35 acres (parcel #785360-0008) located at 1836 South 308 Street from
Single Family — High Density Residential and RS 7.2 (Single Family, one unit per 7,200
square feet) to Multiple Family Residential and RM 3600 (Multi -Family, one unit per 3,600
square feet) (Exhibit C — Vicinity Map).
(iii) File No. 11 -103962 -UP — Request from Isaac Hildebrandt for a comprehensive plan
amendment and rezone of 1.18 acres (parcel #292104-9071) located at 1320 South 359''
Street from Single Family — Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one
unit per 15,000 square feet) to Multiple Family Residential and RM 2400 (Multi -Family, one
unit per 2,400 square feet) (Exhibit D — Vicinity Map).
IV. REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Pursuant to FWRC 19.08.050, Process VI, "Council Rezones," the City Council is required to
review all requests concurrently. The first step in the process is a public hearing by the council, at
which time the council selects those amendment requests it wishes staff to research further.
V. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT SELECTION PROCESS
July 2, 2012 LUTC Meeting — A summary of all requests will be presented to the LUTC
for a recommendation on which requests should be considered further.
July 17 2012 City Council Public Hearing — The City Council shall determine which
requests should be considered further.
VI. BACKGROUND AND STAFF ANALYSIS — SITE-SPECIFIC REQUESTS
A composite map showing the location of the site-specific requests to be presented for selection is
attached as Exhibit A.
A. Site -Specific Request #1— Hoit
1. Summary
File Number:
11 -103859 -UP
Parcel No.:
112103-9131
Address:
None
Location:
East of SW 3080' St/43'd Ave SW and west of Dumas Bay Park
Size:
1.82 acres
Existing Land Use:
Vacant
Applicant/Owner:
Edward Hoit
Existing
Comprehensive Plan:
Single Family — Low Density Residential
Existing Zoning:
Suburban Estates (SE, one unit per five acres)
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012
Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments 21 Page 2 of 8
Requested
Comprehensive Plan:
Requested Zoning:
2. Reason for the Request
Single Family — Medium Density Residential
RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet)
The land is presently vacant and has both a Class I Wetland and a Major Stream on-site.
The combination of the 200 -foot wide wetland buffer and the 100 -foot stream buffer
leaves very little if any buildable land. In addition, the parcel does not have direct access
to the adjacent right-of-way to the west. The owner, Mr. Hoit, has owned the parcel for
over 25 years and is requesting the rezone to make it consistent with the RS 15.0 zoning
to the west, thereby making it a more marketable parcel.
3. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use (Exhibit E — Aerial Map)
B. Site -Specific Request #2 — Barrett
1. Summary
File Number:
Parcel No.:
Address:
Location:
Size:
Applicant/Owner:
Existing
Comprehensive Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Requested
Comprehensive Plan:
Requested Zoning:
2. Reason for the Request
11 -103895 -UP
785360-0008
1836 South 308'' Street
South of South 308`h Street and west of 19'h Avenue South
0.35 acres
Mark Barrett
Single Family — High Density Residential
RS 7.2 (Single Family, one unit per 7,200 square feet)
Multiple Family Residential
RM 3600 (Multi -Family, one unit per 3,600 square feet)
There is a single family house on the site. There are duplexes to the west, south, and
southeast across 19'' Avenue South. The applicant is requesting Multi -Family zoning in
order to build duplexes, which would be consistent with the adjacent uses.
3. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use (Exhibit F— Aerial Map)
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012
Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments 22 Page 3 of 8
Zoning
Land Use
North
Suburban Estates (SE, one unit
Single -Family Residential
per five acres)
South
Suburban Estates (SE, one unit
City Park
per five acres)
East
Suburban Estates (SE, one unit
City Park
per five acres)
West
RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit
Single -Family Residential
per 15,000 square feet)
B. Site -Specific Request #2 — Barrett
1. Summary
File Number:
Parcel No.:
Address:
Location:
Size:
Applicant/Owner:
Existing
Comprehensive Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Requested
Comprehensive Plan:
Requested Zoning:
2. Reason for the Request
11 -103895 -UP
785360-0008
1836 South 308'' Street
South of South 308`h Street and west of 19'h Avenue South
0.35 acres
Mark Barrett
Single Family — High Density Residential
RS 7.2 (Single Family, one unit per 7,200 square feet)
Multiple Family Residential
RM 3600 (Multi -Family, one unit per 3,600 square feet)
There is a single family house on the site. There are duplexes to the west, south, and
southeast across 19'' Avenue South. The applicant is requesting Multi -Family zoning in
order to build duplexes, which would be consistent with the adjacent uses.
3. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use (Exhibit F— Aerial Map)
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012
Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments 22 Page 3 of 8
C. Site -Specific Request #3 — Hildebrandt
1. Summary
File Number:
Parcel No.:
Address:
Location:
Size:
Applicant:
Agent:
Owners:
Existing
Comprehensive Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Requested
Comprehensive Plan:
Requested Zoning:
2. Reason for the Request
11 -103962 -UP
292104-9071
1320 South 359th Street
North of South 359th Street and west of 16th Avenue South
1.18 acres
Eric Hildebrandt
Isaac Hildebrandt
Eric Hildebrandt and Jesse Cherian
Single Family — Medium Density Residential
RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet)
Multiple Family Residential
RM 2400 (Multi -Family, one unit per 2,400 square feet)
There is a single family home on this parcel. Land uses to the east, west, and south are
single-family residential. The applicants own the two parcels to the north of the subject
property, which are 16.63 acres in size. They would like to build a multi -family complex
on the northern parcels and use the subject parcel for additional access and as a utility
easement.
3. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use (Exhibit — Aerial Map) G
Zoning
Land Use
North
RS 7.2 (Single Family, one
Church and Single -Family Residential
unit per 7,200 square feet)
South
RS 7.2 (Single Family, one
Duplexes
unit per 7,200 square feet)
East
RS 7.2 (Single Family, one
Single -Family Residential and Duplexes
unit per 7,200 square feet)
West
RM 1800 (Multi -family, one
Duplex
unit per 1,800 square feet)
C. Site -Specific Request #3 — Hildebrandt
1. Summary
File Number:
Parcel No.:
Address:
Location:
Size:
Applicant:
Agent:
Owners:
Existing
Comprehensive Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Requested
Comprehensive Plan:
Requested Zoning:
2. Reason for the Request
11 -103962 -UP
292104-9071
1320 South 359th Street
North of South 359th Street and west of 16th Avenue South
1.18 acres
Eric Hildebrandt
Isaac Hildebrandt
Eric Hildebrandt and Jesse Cherian
Single Family — Medium Density Residential
RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet)
Multiple Family Residential
RM 2400 (Multi -Family, one unit per 2,400 square feet)
There is a single family home on this parcel. Land uses to the east, west, and south are
single-family residential. The applicants own the two parcels to the north of the subject
property, which are 16.63 acres in size. They would like to build a multi -family complex
on the northern parcels and use the subject parcel for additional access and as a utility
easement.
3. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use (Exhibit — Aerial Map) G
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012
Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments 23 Page 4 of 8
Zoning
Land Use
North
RM 2400 (Multi -Family, one
Vacant and Manufacturing Plant
unit per 2,400 square feet)
South
RS 15.0 (Single Family, one
Single -Family Residential
unit per 15,000 square feet)
East
RS 15.0 (Single Family, one
Single -Family Residential
unit per 15,000 square feet)
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012
Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments 23 Page 4 of 8
West RS 15.0 (Single Family, one Single -Family Residential
unit per 15,000 square feet)
VII. SELECTION CRITERIA
FWRC 19.80.080 contains criteria for selecting amendments for further consideration.
A. Criterion #1— Whether the same area or issue was studied during the last amendment process
and conditions in the immediate vicinity have significantly changed so as to make the
requested change within the public interest.
Response to Criterion #1—
Request
Response
Site Specific Request #1—
This issue was not studied during the last amendment process, or
Hoit
during any previous amendment cycle.
Site Specific Request # 2 —
This issue was not studied during the last amendment process, or
Barrett
during any previous amendment cycle.
Site Specific Request # 3 —
This issue was not studied during the last amendment process. Th
Hildebrandt
two parcels to the north, which are also owned by the applicants,
were rezoned from Commercial Enterprise (CE) to Multi -Family
(RM 2400) as part of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Process.
B. Criterion #2 — The proposed amendment is consistent with the overall vision of the
comprehensive plan.
Response to Criterion #2 —
Request
Response
Site Specific Request #1—
Changing the designation of this parcel from Suburban Estates
Hoit
(SE) to Single Family — High Density Residential (RS 15.0) would
not be consistent with the overall vision of the comprehensive plan.
The existing SE designation for the subject parcel is consistent
with the vision of the comprehensive plan to retain larger urban
lots on or near critical areas in order to avoid development
pressure. The comprehensive plan states that there are two notable
locations that meet this criterion: Spring Valley, located in the
southern portion of the city; and along Puget Sound near Dumas
Bay in the vicinity of Camp Kilworth and the Palisades Retreat
property. This property is west of and abuts Dumas Bay Park.
Site Specific Request # 2 —
Designating this parcel as multi -family is consistent with Land Use
Barrett
Policy LUP23, which is supportive of locating multiple -family
development where transportation and capital facilities
improvements are available. All utilities are available to the site. In
addition, the parcel is adjacent to South 308`h Street, a minor
collector, which is intended to connect higher density areas to the
arterial system. The proposed amendment would also allow
development of the site to be consistent with adjacent land uses.
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012
Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments 24 Page 5 of 8
Request
Response
Site Specific Request # 3 —
This request is not consistent with the comprehensive plan policy
Hildebrandt
to preserve and protect Federal Way's single-family neighborhoods
(LUG3).
C. Criterion #3 — Whether the proposed amendment meets the existing state and local laws,
including the GMA.
Response to Criterion #3 — None of the proposed amendments, if adopted, would be in
conflict with local or state laws if subsequent development of the parcels are in compliance
with local and state regulations, including the FWRC and State Environmental Policy Act
(SEPA).
D. Criterion #4 — In the case of text amendments, or other amendments to goals or policies,
whether the request benefits the city as a whole versus a selected group.
Response to Criterion #4 — Not applicable. The requests are site-specific requests and not
requests for text amendments.
If the request meets the criteria set forth in subsections above, it shall be further evaluated
according to the following criteria:
E. Criterion #1— Whether the proposed amendment can be incorporated into planned or active
projects.
Response to Criterion #1— If the City Council determines that these requests should be
analyzed further, they can be incorporated into the 2012 Planning Commission Work Program.
F. Criterion #2 — Amount of analysis necessary to reach a recommendation on the request. If a
large-scale study is required, a request may have to be delayed until the following year due to
workload, staffmg levels, etc.
Response to Criterion #2 — None of the requests require a large-scale study.
G. Criterion #3 — Volume of requests received. A large volume of requests may necessitate that
some requests be reviewed in a subsequent year.
Response to Criterion #3 — Only three requests were received for the 2012 Comprehensive
Plan Amendment Cycle.
H. Criterion #4 — Order of requests received.
Response to Criterion #4 — The requests were received in the following order:
1. Hoit
2. Barrett
3. Hildebrandt
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012
Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments 25 Page 6 of 8
VIII. COUNCIL ACTION
Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080(4), based on its review of requests according to the criteria in
Section VII of this staff report, the City Council shall determine which requests shall be further
considered for adoption and shall forward those requests to the Planning Commission for its
review and recommendation. The council's decision whether to consider a proposed amendment
shall not constitute a decision or recommendation that the proposed amendment should be
adopted, nor does it preclude later council action to add an amendment for consideration.
IX. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION
A. Site -Specific Request #1— Request from Edward Hoit for a comprehensive plan amendment
and rezone of 1.82 acres (parcel #112103-9131) located to the west of Dumas Bay Park from
Single Family — Low Density Residential and Suburban Estates (SE, one unit per five acres) to
Single Family — Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000
square feet).
Mayor's Recommendation —The Mayor recommends that the request not go forward for
further review because it does not conform to the comprehensive plan.
B. Site -Specific Request #2 — Request from Mark Barrett for a comprehensive plan amendment
and rezone of 0.35 acres (parcel #785360-0008) located at 1836 South 308' Street from Single
Family — High Density Residential and RS 7.2 (Single Family, one unit per 7,200 square feet)
to Multiple Family Residential and RM 3600 (Multi -Family, one unit per 3,600 square feet).
Mayor's Recommendation — The Mayor recommends that the LUTC forward the proposed
amendment request for consideration by the Planning Commission, LUTC, and City Council.
C. Site -Specific Request #3 — Request from Isaac Hildebrandt for a comprehensive plan
amendment and rezone of 1.18 acres (parcel #292104-9071) located at 1320 South 359' Street
from Single Family — Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per
15,000 square feet) to Multiple Family Residential and RM 2400 (Multi -Family, one unit per
2,400 square feet).
Mayor's Recommendation -The Mayor recommends that the request not go forward for
further review because it does not conform to the comprehensive plan.
X. LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The LUTC forwards the recommendation to the full Council as follows:
1. Hoit Request
a) That the request go forward for further consideration.
b) That the request not go forward for further consideration.
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012
Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments 26 Page 7 of 8
APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT:
Bob Celski, Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member
2. Barrett Request
a) That the request go forward for further consideration.
b) That the request not go forward for further consideration.
APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT:
Bob Celski Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member
3. Hildebrandt Request
a) That the request go forward for further consideration.
b) That the request not go forward for further consideration.
APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT:
Bob Celski Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member
XI. LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit A
Composite Map
Exhibit B
Vicinity Map of Site -Specific Request #1 — Hoit
Exhibit C
Vicinity Map of Site -Specific Request #2 — Barrett
Exhibit D
Vicinity Map of Site -Specific Request #3 — Hildebrandt
Exhibit E
Aerial Photo of Site -Specific Request #1 — Hoit
Exhibit F
Aerial Photo of Site -Specific Request #2 — Barrett
Exhibit G
Aerial Photo of Site -Specific Request #3 — Hildebrandt
K:\Comprehensive P1an\2012 Comprehensive Plan\Selection Process\LUTC\Staff Report to the LUTC.doc
Land Userrransportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012
Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments 27 Page 8 of 8
Star,,
�.; Lake
Puget ((
Sound �� o
AL irr,
Lake
M}
Easter Steel I DollofLake to
Lake 9'9 • Lake . iu W
12th ST =- w
p/
North
Lake `
M
ES
d
_S.336th_ j,/
f$1
Q0..,
A 'Lake
Geneva
a Five
Mile
Lake-
Trout
Lake,
City of Federal Way
2012
Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
Composite Map
Exhibit A
Site Specific Requests
Legend
- Request Sites
i' Federal Way City Limits
Request Key
1. - Hoit
2. - Barrett
3. - Hildebrandt
N 0 0.5 1
Mile
This map is accompanied by no warranties,
and is simply a graphic representation.
City of Federal Way
2012
Site Specific Requests
for Comprehensive Plan and
Zo .. Designation Changes
® Comprehensive Plan: Multi Family
Zoning: Multi Family (RM3600)
s
Goodwill[
City Federal Way
_
B
v,,'
w•tiana ..
of
• Designations
Rating: III
Comprehensive2012
Zoninq:Single -
Site Specific Requests
�,
Saes/Lake
for Comprehensive Plan and
800
Zoning Designation Changes
® Comprehensive Plan: Multi Family
Zoning: Multi Family (RM3600)
s
Goodwill[
Barrett
Site Specific Request #2
Exhibit C
Legend
Site Specific Request
Wetlands (1998 City Survey)
Zoning Boundary"
Buildings
Streets
Note: An asterix (*) next to a zoning
designation indicates the property is
governed by a development agreement.
Ll I
94
p ��++ q N 0 250 500
Ra77.L ti _` v_�,F Feet
• ,...._ . 'i.. ,- �y `CITY OF
�
Federal ay
7.
RM18Q0 a � -J, This map is accompanied by no warranties,
-�` c and is simply a graphic representation.
2\Maps\ssr2 2012.mxd
B
`U
Barrett
Site Specific Request #2
Exhibit C
Legend
Site Specific Request
Wetlands (1998 City Survey)
Zoning Boundary"
Buildings
Streets
Note: An asterix (*) next to a zoning
designation indicates the property is
governed by a development agreement.
Ll I
94
p ��++ q N 0 250 500
Ra77.L ti _` v_�,F Feet
• ,...._ . 'i.. ,- �y `CITY OF
�
Federal ay
7.
RM18Q0 a � -J, This map is accompanied by no warranties,
-�` c and is simply a graphic representation.
2\Maps\ssr2 2012.mxd
n1171
esr
RM2400
RS1
CE
S 356TH ST
CE f1
R 15.11
2921049071' f ,,
iT
15.0
co
r
RS35i3O
-wi
d'
u
Todd Beamer
High School
i
City of Federal Way
2012
Site Specific Requests
for Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Designation Changes
Hildebrandt
Site Specific Request #3
Exhibit
Legend
Site Specific Request
Wetlands (1998 City Survey)
QZoning Boundary*
1 ' Buildings
Streets
Note: An asterix (*) next to a zoning
designation indicates the property is
governed by a development agreement.
N 0 250 500
Feet
CITY OF
Federal Way
This map is accompanied by no warranties,
and is simply a graphic representation.
City of Federal Way
2012
Site Specific Requests
for Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Designation Changes
Hoit
Site Specific Request #1
Exhibit E
Legend
Site Specific Request
Streams (City Survey)
Wetlands (1998 City Survey)
QZoning Boundary"
Note: An asterix (') next to a zoning
designation indicates the property is
governed by a development agreement.
N 0 250 500
Feet
CITY OF
Federal Way
This map is accompanied by no warranties,
and is simply a graphic representation.
\Projects\SSR C
City of Federal Way
2012
Site Specific Requests
for Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Designation Changes
Barrett
Site Specific Request/"
Exhibit
" ry Note: An asterix (*) next to a zoning
�f= WL m,��' designation indicates the property is
governed by a development agreement.
Hildebrandt
Site Specific Request #3
Exhibit G'
Legend
Site Specific Request
Streams (City Survey)
M U Wetlands (1998 City Survey)
QZoning Boundary*
Note: An asterix (*) next to a zoning
designation indicates the property is
governed by a development agreement.
N 0 250 500
Feet
CITY OF
Federal Way
This map is accompanied by no warranties,
and is simply a graphic representation.