Loading...
Council PKT 09-04-2012 RegularCITY OF ,'�..� Federal Way AGENDA FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers - City Hall September 4, 2012 7:00 p.m. www. cityoffederalway. com 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. PLfDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. PRESENTATIONS a. Proclamation: National Recovery Month ...page 3 b. Proclamation: Constitution Day — September 17'h ...page 4 c. Mayor's Emerging Issues 4. CITIZEN COMMENT PLEASE COMPLETE A PINK SLIP AND TURN IT IN TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING. When recognized by the Mayor, come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Please limit your comments to three minutes. The Mayor may interrupt comments that exceed three minutes, relate negatively to other individuals or are otherwise inappropriate. 5. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been previously reviewed in their entirety by a Council Committee of three members and brought before full Council for approval. All items are enacted by one motion. Individual items may be removed by a Councilmember for separate discussion and subsequent motion. a. Minutes: August 7, 2012 Special and Regular Meetings...page 5 b. Vouchers — July 2012...page 14 c. Monthly Financial Report — July 2012...paye a� d. 21St Ave. SW at SW 336th Street fntersection Improvements — 85% Design Status RepO�t...page 64 e. Contract for State Lobbyist/Public Affairs...paqe ss f. Use Excess Replacement Reserves to Replace 1992 Shuttle Bus...page 84 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Site Specific Selection Process — 2012 Comprehensive Ptan Amendments...page 88 • Staff Presentation • Public Comment • Council Action The Council may add items and take action on items not listed on the agenda. b. Modification of the Federal Way Revised Code...page �33 Staff Presentation Public Comment Council Action 7. COUNCFL BUSiNESS a. CDBG Loan Advisory Review Committee Appointments...page 13s b. Human Services Commission Appointments...paqe �3s c. 2013-2014 Human Services General Fund Funding Recommendations...page �ao d. 2013-2014 Community Development Block Grant Funding Recommendations...page 150 8. ORDINANCES First Reading: a. CB 608: Amendment to FWRC Reqardinq Residential Open Space Standards in the Citv Center and Citv Center Frame. ...paqe �54 An ordinance of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to open space standards for multi-housing in the City Center-Core and City Center-Frame zoning districts; amending FWRC 19.05.150, 19.100.070, 19.115. 19.225.070 and 19.230.060. b. CB 609: Tacoma Public Utilities (TPU) Water Franchise Aqreement...page 203 An ordinance of the City of Federal Way, Washington, granting City of Tacoma Department of Public Utilities, Water Division, a Municipal Corporation and Public Utilify selling and distributing water within King County, a nonexclusive franchise to occupy fhe rights-of-way of the City of Federal Way, Washington, through the franchise area for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, repairing, renewing and operating a transmission system and accessories within and through the City of Federal Way and addressing hydrant costs within City boundaries. 9. COUNCIL REPORTS 10. MAYOR'S REPORT 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION ■ Collective Bargaining pursuant to RCW 42.30.140(4)(b) ■ Potential Litigation pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) 12. AD.lOURNMENT The Council may add items and take action on items not listed on the agenda. CITY OF Fe d e ra I Way Proclamation National Recovery Month — September 2012 WHEREAS, behavioral health is an essential part of one's overall health and wellness, and prevention works, treatment is effective, and people can and do recover from substance use and mental disorders; and WHEREAS, all people have the fundamental and inherent value to be accepted and treated with respect, human dignity, and worth; and WHEREAS, individuals should have access to frilly participate in community life including economic advancement and prosperity; fair and decent housing; quality education; positive opportunities to benefit from and contribute to material, cultural, and social progress; and WHEREAS, substance use and mental disorders are serious public health problems. In 2009, 4.3 million people received treatment for a substance use disorder and 50.2 million people were treated for a mental health problem, and we must continue to reach the millions more who need help; and WHEREAS, it is critical to educate our policymakers, friends and family members, health care providers, and businesses that substance use and mental disorders are treatable, and that people should seek assistance for these conditions, with the same urgency as they would any other health condition; and NOW, THEREFORE, we the undersigned Mayor and City Council of Federal Way do hereby proclaim the month of September 2012 to be National Recovery Month in Federal Way and encourage all citizens to join us in observing this month and "Join the Voices for Recovery." SIGNED this 4th day of September 2012 FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Skip Priest, Mayor Jeanne Burbidge, Councilmember Dini Duclos, Councilmember Susan Honda, Councilmember Jim Ferrell, Deputy Mayor Bob Celski, Councilmember Roger Freeman, Councilmember Linda Kochmar, Councilmember CITY OF Federal Way PROCLAMATION "Constitution Day" - September 17, 2012 WHEREAS, September 17, 2012 marks the two hundred and twenty -fifth anniversary of the drafting of the Constitution of the United States of America by the Constitutional Convention; and WHEREAS, it is fitting and proper to officially recognize this magnificent document and the anniversary of its creation; and WHEREAS, it is fitting and proper to officially recognize the patriotic celebrations which will commemorate the occasion; and WHEREAS, Public Law #915 signed by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956 guarantees the issuing of a proclamation each year by the President of the United States of America designating September 17 as Constitution Day; WHEREAS, celebrations are to emphasize citizens' responsibilities for protecting and defending the Constitution, preserving it for posterity; inform the people that the Constitution is the basis for America's great heritage and the foundation for our way of life; and encourage the study of historical events which led to the framing of the Constitution in September 1787. NOW, THEREFORE, we the undersigned City Councilmember of the City of Federal Way and do hereby proclaim September 17, 2012 to be CONSTITUTION DAY in Federal Way, and ask our citizens to reaffirm the ideals the Framers of the Constitution had in 1787 and reflect on our Heritage of freedom. SIGNED this 4th day of September 2012 FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Skip Priest, Mayor Jim Ferrell, Deputy Mayor Jeanne Burbidge, Councilmember Bob Celski, Councilmember Dini Duclos, Councilmember Roger Freeman, Councilmember Susan Honda, Councilmember Linda Kochmar, Councilmember SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council approve the draft minutes of the August 7, 2012 Special and Regular Meetings? COMMITTEE: N/A MEETING DATE: N/A CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Carol McNeilly, City Clerk DEPT: Human Resources Attachments: Draft minutes from the August 7, 2012 Special and Regular Meetings. Options Considered: 1. Approve the minutes as presented. 2. Amend the minutes as necessary. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the minutes as presented. CITY CLERK APPROVAL: N/A (i M DIRECTOR APPROVAL: N/A N/A Committee Connell — Committee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: ` I MOVE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES, AS PRESENTED ". BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE, COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED IST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED — 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION # CITY OF . Federal Way MINUTES FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING Council Chambers - City Hall August 7, 2012 6:00 p.m. www.cityoffederalway.com 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Deputy Mayor Ferrell called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm, and announced that Mayor Priest would be joining the Council in executive session. Elected officials present: Deputy Mayor Jim Ferrell, Councilmember Linda Kochmar, Councilmember Susan Honda, Councilmember Jeanne Burbidge, Councilmember Bob Celski, Councilmember Roger Freeman and Councilmember Dini Duclos. Mayor Priest arrived at 6:30 pm. 2. EXECUTIVE SESSION The Council and City Attorney adjourned to Executive Session at 6:00 pm to discuss Collective Bargaining pursuant to RCW 42.30.140(4)(b) and Potential Litigation pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) for approximately one hour. The Council adjourned from Executive Session at 6:55 pm. 3. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Priest adjourned the meeting at 7:00 pm. Attest: Carol McNeilly, CIVIC, City Clerk Approved by Council: City Council Minutes — August 7, 2012 Special Meeting Page 1 of I CITY OF Federal Way MINUTES FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers - City Hall August 7, 2012 7:00 p.m. www.cityoffederalway.com 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Priest called the meeting to order at 7:04 pm. Elected officials present: Mayor Skip Priest, Deputy Mayor Jim Ferrell, Councilmember Linda Kochmar, Councilmember Susan Honda, Councilmember Jeanne Burbidge, Councilmember Bob Celski, Councilmember Roger Freeman and Councilmember Dini Duclos. City staff present: City Attorney Pat Richardson and City Clerk Carol McNeilly. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Police Support Services Manager Cathy Schrock led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. PRESENTATIONS Prior to starting the presentations, Mayor Priest extended condolences on behalf of the City Council, City staff and himself to the friends and family of the young man who was lost in the accidental drowning at Steel Lake Park on Sunday. Mayor Priest also extended condolences to the family of Wayde Rodrigues -Fate who was struck by a vehicle while riding his bicycle in the Westway neighborhood. a. Certificate of Appointment — Human Services Commission At their July 17, 2012 meeting the Council appointed Michael Capenos to the Human Services Commission as a voting member with a term of January 31, 2015. Councilmember Honda read the certificate of appointment into the record. b. CrimeReports.com Demonstration Police Support Services Manager Cathy Schrock reported that in February 2012 the Council approved a subscription to CrimeReports.com, a web -based crime mapping service that provides real -time crime incident data that has occurred in the city as well as registered sex offenders. You can access the site via a link on the Federal Way Police City Council Minutes — August 7, 2012 Regular Meeting Page I of 7 Departments webpage. This tool is beneficial for citizens as well as businesses. Ms. Schrock provided a demonstration of the website, which populates at 5:00 am every day directly from a Police Department records database. Mayor Priest stated this tool is very complimentary to the Safe Cities website. Ms. Schrock added the Police Department has been training their Officers on the tool and a media release is scheduled to go out next week to the public. c. Mayor's Emerging Issues Public Defender Grant Application: In June the Supreme Court issued an order that will impact how cities provide public defender services. The Order establishes that public defenders can accept 300 cases for misdemeanors. The city conducted an analysis of public defender services and the results showed that we are protecting the rights for representation to the indigent defendant with our contracts for public defenders. The Order also mandates the City to provide administrative support for the public defenders. One example identified in the Order was case management systems. Last week the City submitted a grant application to the Office of Public Defender for $140K to purchase a case management system which would track the number of cases assigned to public defenders as well as provide tools for electronic filing of cases. Sound Transit — Proposed Parking Fee: Sound Transit recently announced that they are considering a policy for parking fees at their regional facilities as a means to address over - crowding. They will conduct a long -term study on the issue and present some initial ideas to their board later this Fall. The City has been in communication with Sound Transit and other transit agencies regarding over - crowding at the transit center and will monitor this issue. The City will continue to advocate for sensible solutions to the address the issue and will follow this parking fee policy. Waste Management: Due to recent labor issues Waste Management has failed to provide service to Federal Way residents. City staff reviewed the contract with Waste Management and determined the service disruption violated the terms of their contract. Last week Mayor Priest notified Waste Management that they were in default of the contract and that the City would levy fines in accordance with the terms of the contract. While service for Federal Way residents resumed last Thursday the city will be monitoring service more closely. If your service has been disrupted or has not been reinstated please contact the City at 253 - 835 -2700. Deputy Mayor Ferrell stated that he was informed of the Sound Transit parking fee proposal by watching the news. He is disappointed that Sound Transit did not communicate directly with the City regarding this issue. Councilmember Duclos stated the proposed parking fee will more than likely discourage people from using transit systems and drive their own vehicles. City Council Minutes —August 7, 2012 Regular Meeting Page 2 of 7 4. CITIZEN COMMENT Charlene Fale on July 22, 2012 her son was struck by a vehicle while riding his bicycle in the Westway neighborhood and later that day passed away. The media has not accurately reported on this event and she provided some clarification. She stated what is important is how people can learn from this tragedy. There needs to be an increased awareness about speeding and stopping times necessary for vehicles to avoid injury to pedestrians /cyclists, especially in residential neighborhoods. Norma Blanchard spoke regarding the 90 -day timeframe to collect signatures on initiatives. She stated she the Council has the authority to change or remove the timeframe as well as the required number of signatures. Libby Bennett with Occupy Federal Way. Ms. Bennett submitted written comments for the City Clerk to read into the record regarding their upcoming "Know the Vote Campaign" and the booth they will have at the August 11, 2012 Federal Way Farmers Market. 5. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been previously reviewed in their entirety by a Council Committee of three members and brought before full Council for approval. All items are enacted by one motion. Individual items may be removed by a Councilmember for separate discussion and subsequent motion. a. Minutes: July 17, 2012 Special and Regular Meetings b. Vouchers c. Monthly Financial Report — June 2012 d. Interlocal Agreement Transferring CDBG Funds from King County to the City of Federal Way's CDBG Program e. 2012 Human Services Commission Work Plan f. Monument Sign Bid g. King County RSO Grant Funding Cost Reimbursement Agreement h. Cingular Wireless (AT &T) Site Lease Renewal — Saghalie Park i. Cingular Wireless (AT &T) Site Lease Renewal — Sacajawea Park Motion: Deputy Mayor Ferrell moved approval of items 5a through 5i. Councilmember Duclos second. Vote: Deputy Mayor Ferrell Yes Councilmember Kochmar Yes Councilmember Honda Yes Councilmember Burbidge Yes Councilmember Celski Yes Councilmember Freeman Yes Councilmember Duclos Yes Motion carried 7 -0. City Council Minutes — August 7, 2012 Regular Meeting Page 3 of 7 6. COUNCIL BUSINESS a. Purchase of Bridges Propert y Mayor Priest stated as part of the vision for conservation along the Hylebos Creek one of the properties identified to continue the conservation plan was the Bridges property. Surface Water Manager Will Appleton reported that on May 4, 2010 the Council authorized staff to pursue the acquisition of the Bridges property. The property is located in the Spring Valley riparian corridor, and is comprised of two parcels totaling 17.3 acres. The purchase price for the property has been negotiated at $610K. King County Conservation Futures funding in the amount of $305K and matching Surface Water Management funds will be used to pay for the purchase. Mr. Appleton highlighted key points of the agreement: closing costs will be split between the seller and the City, the seller has asked to be able to name both ponds on the property and the closing date would be September 15, 2012. Motion: Councilmember Celski moved to authorize the Mayor to execute the settlement agreement dated August 7, 2012 and direct staff to proceed with the purchase of the Bridges property, consisting of two parcels totaling 17.3 acres in the amount of $610K. Councilmember Duclos second. Vote: Deputy Mayor Ferrell Yes Councilmember Kochmar Yes Councilmember Honda Yes Councilmember Burbidge Yes Councilmember Celski Yes Councilmember Freeman Yes Councilmember Duclos Yes Motion carried 7 -0. b. Selection of Vendor for Health and Wellness Program Mayor Priest stated this item did not go through a Council Committee. He noted rising healthcare costs pose a significant challenge to the city. Earlierthis yearthe city changed healthcare providers for many of our employees. Recently, the City's Wellness Committee was expanded to the Health and Wellness Committee in an effort to focus on the health of employees. Janet Shull, Chair of the Commit provided a presentation on the selection of a new vendor to assist the Committee in developing a program to encourage participation in a Wellness Campaign. Ms. Shull stated the Committee has been tasked with developing and implementing a program that is aimed at improving overall employee health /wellness. Implementation for the program would require assistance of a qualified wellness program vendor. Ms. Shull reviewed the benefits of a program which include reduced health care costs for the city and employees, positioning the city to move toward self- insured status and improvements in "presenteeism" and productivity. On July 19, 2012 the Health and Wellness Committee interviewed two vendors to assist in developing an employee wellness program. The Committee is asking for authorization to enter into an agreement with Worksite Wellness. The contract amount is estimated to be between $32K and $50K annually. The budget range is dependent on level of participation. If the Council approves this item, the Committee will meet with the vendor to develop city specific program elements, conduct biometric testing for individuals that what to participate and identify incentives to encourage participation. City Council Minutes —August 7, 2012 Regular Meeting Page 4 of 7 Councilmember Kochmar asked what additional service would be provided by the vendor. Ms. Shull stated a third party vendor is necessary to perform biometric testing and comply with HIPAA confidentiality requirements. The vendor would provide individual results to participants and compile the testing results and provide the city with a picture of participants overall health. Councilmember Kochmar stated she would prefer this item go through a Council Committee prior to coming before full Council. Mayor Priest stated that the matter was brought to full Council because of the importance of controlling healthcare costs. Councilmember Honda inquired why a vendor would perform biometric testing when employees can get testing performed by their physician. Ms. Shull stated individuals who chose to participate would have the option of having their testing done at city hall; they could use a home test -kit, or go through their private doctor. The vendor would collect the data and provide a general overall health report to the Committee. Councilmember Celski feels this is a worthwhile program. He asked if the program had a physical fitness aspect to it. Ms. Shull responded that the program would include a physical fitness aspect as well as healthy eating and other items. Councilmember Kochmar requested a re- evaluation be performed at the end of the year on this program to ensure we are getting a return on investment. Mayor Priest noted that the City does this on an ongoing basis with every program. Motion: Councilmember Duclos moved to direct staff to enter into an agreement with Worksite Wellness to develop and implement an employee wellness program that is designed to improve employee health and reduce health- related expenses. Councilmember Freeman second. Vote: Deputy Mayor Ferrell Yes Councilmember Kochmar Yes Councilmember Honda Yes Councilmember Burbidge Yes Councilmember Celski Yes Councilmember Freeman Yes Councilmember Duclos Yes Motion carried 7 -0. 7. ORDINANCES Second Reading: a. CB # 607: Amend Federal Way Revised Code Title 6 "Public Safety and Welfare" An ordinance of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to public safety; amending Federal Way Revised Code 6.40.010, "Frauds and Swindles, " adding a new section to Chapter 6.55 FWRC, "Public Peace, "and adding a new section to Chapter 6.75 FWRC, "Miscellaneous Crimes and Offenses." At their July 17, 2012 meeting the City Council forwarded this ordinance to second reading at enactment. Mayor Priest noted at that meeting, legal staff was directed to provide the Council with additional information on this item. He asked if there were any additional questions from staff on this item. City Council Minutes —August 7, 2012 Regular Meeting Page 5 of 7 City Clerk McNeilly read the ordinance title into the record. Motion: Councilmember Honda moved approval of the ordinance amending Title 6 Public Safety and Welfare. Councilmember Duclos second. Councilmember Freeman stated he would be voting against the motion as he feels the punishment of a gross- misdemeanor for possession of electronic benefit card and roll your own cigarette machines in a retail establishment is too severe. Deputy Mayor Ferrell asked City Attorney Richardson if the Council is able to adopt the proposed ordinance with a lesser punishment. City Attorney Richardson replied that State Law prohibits reducing the punishment of a criminal act, the proposal before Council is to incorporate State Law. Vote: Deputy Mayor Ferrell Yes Councilmember Kochmar Yes Councilmember Honda Yes Councilmember Burbidge Yes Councilmember Celski Yes Councilmember Freeman No Councilmember Duclos Yes Motion carried 6 -1. Ordinance 12 -726 8. COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Honda had no report. Councilmember Kochmar had no report. Deputy Mayor Ferrell had no report Councilmember Burbidge reported the next Lodging Tax Advisory Committee is August 15, 2012. This weekend the Farmers Market is sponsoring a health run. August 23, 2012 is the sand sculpture event as well as the Federal Way Community Gardens tour. Centerstage Theatre is partnering with Central Washington University for a summer theatre festival. Councilmember Celski stated the next Land Use, Transportation Committee meeting is September 10, 2012. Councilmember, Freeman announced that he attended a memorial service at Federal Way High School for the young man who lost his life in a drowning accident at Steel Lake Park. There were close to 200 students in attendance at the memorial. He commented on Sound Transits lack of insight and vision for how they are impacting Federal Way. Councilmember Duclos reported the next Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee meeting is August 28, 2012. City Council Minutes —August 7, 2012 Regular Meeting Page 6 of 7 9. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Priest had no report. 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION The City Council did not adjourn to executive session. 11. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Priest adjourned the meeting at 8:06 pm. Attest: Carol McNeilly, CMC, City Clerk Approved by Council: City Council Minutes — August 7, 2012 Regular Meeting Page 7 of 7 SUBJECT: VOUCHERS POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council approve the vouchers in the total amount of $2,364,667.99? COMMITTEE: Finance, Economic Development, and Regional Affairs Committee MEETING DATE: August 28, 2012 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Tho Kraus, Finance Director DEPT: Finance I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the City of Federal Way, Washington, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said liens. Finance Director Attachments: Voucher List Options Considered: NA MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: NA MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: lcommit# Counci Initial COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: "I move approval of the vouchers and forward to the September 4, 2012 Council Meeting for approval. " Dini Duclos RogdT Treemil-An Bob Celski Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the vouchers pursuant to RCW 42.24. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED 1ST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED— 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION # City of Federal Way - Accounts Payable Check List Bank of America Page 1 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 230752 7/31/2012 001360 AABCO BARRICADE COMPANY INC, 71.18 7/5/2012 91610 PRCS -RWB BARRICADE SIGNS 71.18 230753 7/31/2012 000083 AARO INC DBA THE LOCK SHOP, 334.25 6/25/2012 80206 FWCC -TOP LATCH, LOCK CYLINDER 197.10 7/612012 80384 PD- DUPLICATE KEY 48.45 7/10/2012 80431 PKM -LOCK HOUSING & CORE 61.32 7/10/2012 80445 PKM -REKEY LOCK 27.38 230754 7/31/2012 000332 ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS INC, 4.00 7/1212012 20616244 LAW-BULK DEL TO B. CHRISTIE - 4.00 230755 7/31/2012 011322 ABELLA, C. ANGELO 200.00 7/10/2012 07/10/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 7/20/2012 07/20/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 230756 7/31/2012 001856 ACTION SERVICES CORPORATION, 10,772.71 6/30/2012 73152 PWST -06/12 STREET SWEEPING SVC 10,772.71 230757 7/31/2012 003258 ADVANCED PRODUCTS, 100.65 7/6/2012 20041407 PD- ASSAULT FOGGERS & STEAM SPR 100.65 230758 7/31/2012 009556 ADVANCING LEADERSHIP, 1,075.00 7/18/2012 1310 PD- ADVANCING LEADERSHIP TIROUX 1,075.00 230759 7/31/2012 000568 AGRI SHOP INC, 316.66 7/3/2012 23301/1 PKM -NYLON LINE 59.62 7/2/2012 23270/1 PWST -STIHL LINE TRIMMER REPAIR 158.48 7/2/2012 23271/1 PWST -STIHL POLE SAW REPAIRS 49.28 7/2/2012 23272/1 PWST -STIHL LINE TRIMMER REPAIR 49.28 230760 7/31/2012 006674 AHBL INC, 3,200.00 6/30/2012 86515 PARKS -PARK PLAN UPDATE AG12 -06 3,200.00 230761 7/31/2012 005571 ALLEN, LYNETTE 140.43 7/17/2012 ALLEN 2021 PD -RWB OFFICER MEALS 140.43 230762 7/31/2012 001285 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC, 85.45 7/10/2012 TM- 125119 PWST- MARKING PAINT 85.45 230763 7/31/2012 005287 AMERICALL COMMUNICATIONS &, 261.81 7/21/2012 2136417 -0712 PW /SWM -AFTER HR CALL- OUTAGII- 130.91 7/21/2012 2D6417 -0712 PW /SWM -AFTER HR CALL- OUTAG11- 130.90 230764 7/31/2012 003269 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER CO, 176.46 6/20/2012 3615469 FWCC- TRAVEL SUEDE CURTAINS 176.46 230765 7/31/2012 013305 AMERICAN RED CROSS, 148.00 6/20/2012 10101938 FWCC - LIFEGUARDING CHALLENGE 54.00 6/20/2012 10108146 FWCC - LIFEGUARDING CHALLENGE 94.00 230766 7/31/2012 001378 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL, 395.95 6/14/2012 40258733 FWCC - INTEGRAL MOTOR 395.95 230767 7131/2012 006211 AQUATECHNEX, INC., 2,237.91 7/11/2012 3603 SWM- AQUATIC PLANT MGMT STLKAG 2,237.91 230768 7/31/2012 010530 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES, 313.18 7/912012 655 - 6277670 FWCC -FLOOR MATS SVC 121.00 7/9/2012 655 - 6277671 FWCC -LINEN SVC 35.59 6/25/2012 655 - 6253584 FWCC -FLOOR MATS SVC 121.00 6/25/2012 655 - 6253585 FWCC -LINEN SVC 35.59 230769 7/31/2012 010530 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES, 100.63 7/17/2012 655 - 6293446 DBC -LINEN SVC 55.06 7/10/2012 655 - 6281475 DBC -LINEN SVC 45.57 230770 7/31/2012 013196 ARC IMAGING RESOURCES, 109.01 6/30/2012 959219 IT -07/12 OCE PLOTTER SYSTEM MA 32.70 6/30/2012 959219 IT -07/12 OCE PLOTTER SYSTEM MA 76.31 230771 7/31/2012 012945 ARREDONDO, MARIA 125.00 7/30/2012 1133367 PRCS- REFUND RWB 2012 VENDOR DE 125.00 230772 7/31/2012 001604 BALL, GIGI Y 200.00 7/20/2012 07/20/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 7/17/2012 07/17/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 230773 7/31/2012 014510 BASKARAN, NANDAKUMAR 2.50 2/1712012 1048751 PRCS- REFUND COMM. REC 06/05 2.50 230774 7/31/2012 011024 BASSETT, GRANT 292.82 Bank of America Page 2 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 7/10/2012 BASSETT 2012 PD- CLOTHING ALLOW. G BASSETT 292.82 7/1/2012 230775 7/31/2012 001422 BERGER /ABAM ENGINEERS INC, PD- REPAIR UNIFORM TILFORD, ECK 123.63 7,770.14 7/11/2012 300180 PWST -20TH INTERSECTION AG1 1-15 7,770.14 PD -ALTER JACKET BUSTER 230776 7/31/2012 001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC, 1,028.91 7/6/2012 941957 -01 PD -NEW UNIFORMS ANTHOLT 79.88 6/28/2012 942017 -81 PD -REPLC DUTY BELTS 136.88 PD -REPLC JUMPSUIT MARTIN 6/28/2012 944313 PD- UNIFORM SHOES HWANG 130.25 7/13/2012 6/28/2012 944651 -01 PD -CIS VALLEY RESPONSE TEAM JA 555.48 6/28/2012 944960 PD -REPLC UNIFORM SHIRTS TSENG 104.52 7/3/2012 943576 -02 PD- VALLEY RESPONSE TEAM COAT 21.90 7/10/2012 230777 7/31/2012 004919 BRATWEAR, 1,160.06 7/1/2012 6081 PD- REPAIR UNIFORM TILFORD, ECK 123.63 7/2/2012 6104 PD -ALTER JACKET BUSTER 42.12 7/6/2012 6175 PD- REPAIR JUMPSUIT PURCELLA 40.35 7/13/2012 6240 PD -REPLC JUMPSUIT MARTIN 476.98 7/13/2012 6241 PD -REPLC JUMPSUIT HENSING 476.98 230778 7/31/2012 004866 BRIM TRACTOR COMPANY INC, 567.81 7/10/2012 IL44978 PWFLT -WHEEL DISC & SCREWS 567.81 230779 7/31/2012 007087 BROWNELLS INC, 107.51 7/16/2012 07721896.00 PD -CLOCK SLIDE RELEASE, HAMMER 107.51 230780 7/31/2012 000768 BSN SPORTS, 963.15 4/2/2012 94594921 PRCS -SLOW PITCH BATS 963.15 230781 7/31/2012 000991 CASCADE COFFEE INC, 416.15 5/14/2012 30000248 FWCC- COFFEE & COFFEE SUPPLIES 255.85 7/2/2012 202184210 HR- COFFEE & COFFEE SUPPLIES 160.30 230782 7/31/2012 012371 CASCADE ENGINEERING SERVICES, 1,500.00 6/29/2012 ML- 12062904247 PD- CALIBRATE/MAINT RADAR GUNS 1,500.00 230783 7/31/2012 004676 CENTERSTAGE THEATRE ARTS, 35,355.86 7/6/2012 JULY 6, 2012 CD -TEG CENTERSTAGE -THE WHO TO 2,500.00 7/11/2012 JULY 11, 2012 PRCS -FW DANCE REHEARSAL HOURS 480.00 7/11/2012 JULY 11, 2012A PRCS- FRIENDSHIP THEATRE REHEAR 1,105.00 7/13/2012 JULY 13, 2012 DBC -07/12 KFT MANAGEMENTAG09- 6,300.00 7/19/2012 JULY 19, 2012 CDED- SUMMER STOCK FESTIVALAGt 24,970.86 230784 7/31/2012 000202 CENTURYLINK, 2,070.60 7/16/2012 83993845 IT -06/12 PHONE /DATASVC 1,035.30 7/16/2012 83993845 IT -06112 PHONE /DATASVC 931.77 7/16/2012 83993845 IT -06/12 PHONE /DATASVC 103.53 230785 7/31/2012 012038 CERIUM NETWORKS INC, 988.22 8/1/2012 027801 IT -08/12 PHONENOICE MAIL SYST 49.41 8/1/2012 027801 IT -08/12 PHONENOICE MAIL SYST 494.11 8/1/2012 027801 IT -08/12 PHONENOICE MAIL SYST 444.70 230786 7/3112012 014518 CHANDRA, JOHN 2.50 2/17/2012 1048752 PRCS- REFUND OPEN BALANCE 10/05 2.50 230787 7/31/2012 014524 CHAVEZ, ANGELICA 200.00 7/12/2012 1129781 PRCS- REFUND RENTAL DEPOSIT 06/ 200.00 230788 7/31/2012 007368 CHIEF SUPPLY CORPORATION, 68.15 6/29/2012 101207 PD- SHARPS CONTAINERS 62.36 6/25/2012 499668 PD- ANTIBACTERIAL HAND CLEANER 5.79 230789 7/31/2012 008426 CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER, 26,825.17 7/12/2012 JULY 31, 2012 CD -02- 60393,02- 71472, 0167252, 29,720.20 7/12/2012 JULY 31, 2012 CD -02- 60393,02- 71472, 0167252, - 4,667.03 7/1212012 02 -57019 REFUND CD -02 -57019 RELEASE BOND BALAN 1,772.00 230790 7/31/2012 010360 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, 2,600.85 7/24/2012 CK #1227 PD -FORCE SCIENCE TRNG BERTUCCI 224.38 7/24/2012 CK #1227 PD -FORCE SCIENCE TRNG BERTUCCI 125.00 7124/2012 CK #1234 PD- CHAPLAINS CONF. DAUSTIN 618.85 7/24/2012 CK #1234 PD- CHAPLAINS CONF. D AUSTIN 275.00 7/24/2012 CK #1235 PD- FIRARMS INSTRUCTOR TRNG SUM 393.24 7/24/2012 CK #1235 PD- FIRARMS INSTRUCTOR TRNG SUM 240.00 7/19/2012 CK #1232 PD -FORCE SCIENCE TRNG J CLARY 224.38 7/19/2012 CK #1232 PD -FORCE SCIENCE TRNG J CLARY 125.00 7/19/2012 CK #1241 IT -ESRI CONF. E EARLE 375.00 Bank ofAmerica Page 3 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 230791 7/31/2012 003752 COASTWIDE SUPPLY DBA, 6/22/2012 234388 5,337.09 10.00 6/13/2012 W2440555 FWCC- JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1,379.47 7/10/2012 234466 PD -CITY BUSINESS MEMORABILLIA 7/3/2012 T2447518 PKM- JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 688.72 000168 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE INC, 7/10/2012 W2449074 FWCC- JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1,795.62 6/26/2012 W2444024 FWCC- JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1,473.28 230792 7/31/2012 001969 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY INC, 6/23/2012 3263685 PWST -MARK TWAIN RFB LEGALAD 2,308.26 7/5/2012 41150 HRCK- CODIFICATION SERVICES 2,308.26 230793 7/31/2012 005102 COLE - PARMER INSTRUMENT COMPANY, 481.02 PRCS- REFUND RWB 2012 VENDOR DE 7/16/2012 8231300 SWM- ETHANOLANHYD. DENAT 354.09 011297 DASH MEDICAL GLOVES, 7/11/2012 8227145 SWM- SAMPLE BAGS, PARAFILM 126.93 230794 7/31/2012 008417 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT INC, PD -EXAM GLOVES 882.70 8,441.00 230804 7/31/2012 6/24/2012 INV- 6013188 CDED - COMMERCIAL AIRTIME AG 12- 8,441.00 230795 7/31/2012 008445 COPIERS NORTHWEST INC, 6/30/2012 162315 4,398.43 647.72 7/12/2012 INV719785 IT -06/12 OVERAGE COPIERS /PRINT 87.97 DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA 7/12/2012 INV719785 IT -06/12 OVERAGE COPIERS /PRINT 43.98 7/10/2012 07/10/12 7/12/2012 INV719785 IT -06/12 OVERAGE COPIERS /PRINT 1,187.58 7/12/2012 INV719785 IT -06/12 OVERAGE COPIERS /PRINT 1,099.61 7/12/2012 INV719785 IT -06/12 OVERAGE COPIERS /PRINT 483.83 100.00 7/12/2012 INV719785 IT -06/12 OVERAGE COPIERS /PRINT 1,495.46 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 230796 7/31/2012 000721 CORLISS RESOURCES INC, 230806 7/31/2012 000939 2,497.97 6/28/2012 330170 PKM- CONCRETE SUPPLIES 277.04 7/1/2012 5236041 070112 6/29/2012 330266 SWM- CONCRETE SUPPLIES 216.70 230807 7/31/2012 000570 7/5/2012 330922 SWM- CONCRETE SUPPLIES 2,004.23 1,981.86 230797 7/31/2012 012359 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, 7/16/2012 1087437 PWFLT -OLF 65.00 6/25/2012 13064 FWCC- 2012/2013 POOL CERTIFICAT 65.00 PWFLT -OLF 230798 7/31/2012 009696 CRESTWOOD ANIMAL HOSPITAL, 477.21 PWFLT- REPAIR BRAKE LIGHTS 6/29/2012 24104 PD -K9 FAX MEDICAL CARE 477.21 230799 7131/2012 009505 D& L SUPPLYAND MFG., INC, 54.04 287.85 6/26/2012 277555 DBC- CERAMIC STEM 46.89 7/3/2012 277699 CHB- FRICTION RING 24.36 51.41 7/3/2012 277747 CHB -BRASS P -TRAP W /CLEAN OUT 216.60 PWFLT-OLF 230800 7/31/2012 000854 D J TROPHY, 94.50 6/22/2012 234388 MO- SPIRIT AWARD PLAQUE ENGRAVI 10.00 7/10/2012 234466 PD -CITY BUSINESS MEMORABILLIA 84.50 230801 7/31/2012 000168 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE INC, 969.40 7/7/2012 3264208 MO -STATE LOBBYIST RFP LEGALAD 218.30 6/23/2012 3263685 PWST -MARK TWAIN RFB LEGALAD 751.10 230802 7/31/2012 011580 DANIELS, KIM 125.00 7/18/2012 1133369 PRCS- REFUND RWB 2012 VENDOR DE 125.00 230803 7/3112012 011297 DASH MEDICAL GLOVES, 882.70 7/2/2012 INVO744140 PD -EXAM GLOVES 882.70 230804 7/31/2012 006869 DAVIS DOOR SERVICE INC, 647.72 6/30/2012 162315 PKM- GARAGE DOOR REPAIRS 647.72 230805 7/31/2012 005341 DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA 612.50 7/10/2012 07/10/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 175.00 7/17/2012 07/17/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 237.50 7/20/2012 07/20/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 7/24/2012 07/24/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 230806 7/31/2012 000939 DS WATERS OF AMERICA, LP, 13.14 7/1/2012 5236041 070112 PKM - BOTTLE WATER SVC #29241185 13.14 230807 7/31/2012 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DBA), 1,981.86 7/16/2012 1087437 PWFLT -OLF 48.13 7/7/2012 1087298 PWFLT -OLF 51.41 7/7/2012 1087303 PWFLT- REPAIR BRAKE LIGHTS 151.23 7/712012 1087304 PWFLT -OLF 54.04 717/2012 1087311 PWFLT- REPAIR TURN SIGNAL 116.11 7/7/2012 1087312 PWFLT -OLF 51.41 7/7/2012 1087313 PWFLT-OLF 47.91 6/30/2012 1087206 PWFLT -OLF, OIL DRAIN PLUG 55.54 6/29/2012 1087186 PWFLT- SHIFTER CABLE 241.06 6/29/2012 1087187 PWFLT - HEADLAMPS 39.50 6/27/2012 1087145 PWFLT -REPLC FUEL PUMP 746.87 Bank ofAmerica Page 4 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 6/28/2012 1087157 PWFLT -PICK UP & SERVICE 44.84 7/1112012 1087362 PWFLT -OLF 51.41 7/1112012 1087366 PWFLT- OXYGEN SENSOR 202.23 7/14/2012 1087426 PWFLT -OLF 48.13 7/14/2012 1087427 PWFLT - HEADLAMPS 32.04 230808 7/31/2012 000328 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA), 26,164.46 7/15/2012 0381447 PWFLT - 07/01/12- 07/15/12 VEHICL 6,587.95 7/15/2012 0381447 PWFLT - 07/01/12- 07/15/12 FUEL C - 225.90 7/15/2012 0381448 PD- 07/01/12- 07/15/12 VEHICLE F 13,126.86 7/15/2012 0381448 PD- 07/01/12- 07/15/12 VEHICLE F 885.61 7/15/2012 0381448 PD- 07/01/12- 07/15/12 FUEL CRED - 486.03 6/30/2012 0380514 PWFLT - 06/16/12- 06/30/12 VEHICL 6,491.46 6/30/2012 0380514 PWFLT- 06/16/12- 06/30/12 FUEL C - 215.49 230809 7/31/2012 001748 EVERSON'S ECONO -VAC INC, 23,741.95 6/18/2012 069363 SWM -06/12 MAINT /SERVICE AG08 -0 23,741.95 230810 7/31/2012 011726 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS, INC, 2,897.40 6/26/2012 4999611 PKM -FIELD MARKING CHALK 2,897.40 230811 7/31/2012 006645 EXPRESS TOWING LLC, 193.86 6/16/2012 13837 PD- VEHICLE TOW CASE 12 -7355 193.86 230812 7/31/2012 000217 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, 5.61 6/29/2012 7- 936 -80204 CDHS -FED EX TO DEPT OF COMMERC 5.61 230813 7/31/2012 012942 FEDERAL WAY AUTO GLASS, 301.13 7/10/2012 1000927 PD- VEHICLE CLEANING 109.50 7/10/2012 1000928 PD- VEHICLE CLEANING 109.50 7/16/2012 1000929 PD- VEHICLE CLEANING 82.13 230814 7/31/2012 000229 FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER COMMERCE, 80.00 7/18/2012 3038 CC- 07/18/12 CHAMBER LUNCHEON- 80.00 230815 7/31/2012 001276 FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY COUNCIL, 22,753.05 7/19/2012 401 CDED -TEG SAND SCULPTURE EVENT 14,107.85 7/27/2012 402 CDED -TEG SAND SCULPTURE EVENT 8,645.20 230816 7/31/2012 012834 FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY GARDENS, 861.94 7/24/2012 JULY 24, 2012 MO- COMMUNITY GARDENSAG11 -078- 861.94 230817 7/31/2012 008151 FEDERAL WAY FARMERS MARKET, 2,344.55 6/26/2012 JUNE 26, 2012 CDED -TEG FARMERS MARKETAG12 -0 2,344.55 230818 7/31/2012 012626 FERGUSON, ERIC W 1,380.00 7/13/2012 052 MO- CONFLICT DEFENDER SVC AG12- 1,380.00 230819 7/31/2012 002955 FERRELLS FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO, 1,561.48 6/20/2012 19005 SWM -FIRE EXTINGUISHER & MAINT 128.12 6/20/2012 19006 PWFLT -FIRE EXTINGUISHER 228.86 6/20/2012 19007 PKM -FIRE EXTINGUISHER & MAINT. 613.09 6/20/2012 19007 PWFLT -FIRE EXTINGUISHER MAINT. 68.00 6/20/2012 19009 PWFLT -FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 523.41 230820 7/31/2012 013290 FIRST STUDENT, INC, 1,407.00 7/3/2012 229 -C- 049251 PRCS -DAY CAMP BUS SVC 1,407.00 230821 7/31/2012 002664 FLEX -PLAN SERVICES INC, 214.40 6/30/2012 198784 HR -06/12 FLEX PLAN ADM SVC 214.40 230822 7/31/2012 008860 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA, 2,946.06 7/18/2012 4053946 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 2,180.34 7/6/2012 4026804 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 694.34 7/6/2012 4028135 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 71.38 230823 7/31/2012 002870 FREEWAY TRAILER SALES INC, 45.93 7/13/2012 107572 SWM- ADAPTER FOR TRAILER HARNES 45.93 230824 7/31/2012 007404 FULLER, MICHELLE M 120.00 7/20/2012 07/20/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 120.00 230825 7/31/2012 000923 FURNEY'S NURSERY INC, 113.79 6/21/2012 1 -70660 PKM -HEDGE SHRUBS 113.79 230826 7/3112012 004578 GENE'S TOWING INC, 193.82 6/11/2012 394408 PD- VEHICLE TOW SVC 193.82 230827 7/31/2012 014527 GIBSON, ERICA 14.00 7/19/2012 1133895 PRCS- REFUND RECITAL 2012 REFUN 14.00 230828 7/31/2012 005847 GLOCK INC, 300.00 4/30/2012 TRP/100030141 PD- ARMORERS TRNG M SANT 300.00 Bank of America Page 5 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 230829 7/31/2012 010940 GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE CNTR, 596.25 7/18/2012 900120253 PD -NEW TIRE 119.25 7/1812012 900120254 PD- 2NEWTIRES 238.50 7/18/2012 900120255 PD- 2NEWTIRES 238.50 230830 7/31/2012 004824 GOS PRINTING CORPORATION, 2,343.69 7/20/2012 78476 PD -OT, LEAVE REQUEST FORMS 958.03 6/25/2012 78398 PD -PET LICENSE RENEWAL BROCHUR 842.48 7/10/2012 78475 PD- MENTAL HEALTH CONTACT FORMS 166.51 6/28/2012 78473 PD- REPORT ROUTING LABELS 376.67 230831 7/31/2012 001992 GOSNEY MOTOR PARTS, 63.96 6/29/2012 547689 PWFLT - ADAPTER MOUNT KIT 63.96 230832 7/31/2012 002547 GRAINGER INC, 1,621.80 7/9/2012 9871139201 FWCC- SPONGES, SCOUR PADS 330.19 7/11/2012 9874179675 FWCC -PUMP MOTOR 704.80 6/20/2012 9858163802 FWCC -LAMP, LED LAMP 370.60 6/19/2012 9856656955 FWCC- NEEDLE NOSE PLIERS 76.72 6/19/2012 9856656963 FWCC- BATTERIES 123.30 6/19/2012 9856656971 FWCC - BATTERY 16.19 230833 7/31/2012 011092 GREGORY, KRISTEN 100.00 7/18/2012 GREGORY 2012 PD- MEDICAL DEDUCTIBLE GREGORY 100.00 230834 7/3112012 014521 GULBRANSEN, BLAKE 150.00 7/10/2012 07/10/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 150.00 230835 7/31/2012 000671 H D FOWLER COMPANY, 162.59 7/5/2012 13163068 PWST - IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 87.48 7/19/2012 13175654 PWST- MERCURY SENSOR SWITCH 75.11 230836 7/31/2012 011399 H. BERRYMAN EDWARDS, MD, 2,725.00 7/16/2012 JULY 16, 2012 PD-IME EVALUATION OF SE 07/06/ 2,725.00 230837 7/31/2012 002590 HACH COMPANY, 185.01 7/13/2012 7845247 SWM-STABLCAL AMPULE KIT 185.01 230838 7/31/2012 005087 HART HEALTH & SAFETY, 69.28 7/312012 00952 - 634977 HR- MEDICAL/FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 69.28 230839 7/31/2012 003841 HEAD - QUARTERS PTS, 498.25 6/30/2012 25156 PKM- SANICAN SVC AGI2 -014- 498.25 230840 7/31/2012 001487 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY, 5,330.83 7/16/2012 51513731 IT -RR LAPTOPS PHASE I -2^ 5,330.83 230841 7/31/2012 014498 HORSFALL, DEBORAH 2.66 2/17/2012 1048686 PRCS- REFUND COMM. REC 03/02 2.66 230842 7/31/2012 014501 HOWARD, EUNICE 2.35 2/17/2012 1048886 PRCS- REFUND HEALTH & FITNESS 0 2.35 230843 7/31/2012 012446 HUYEN, MARTIN 100.00 7/17/2012 07/17/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 230844 7/31/2012 007109 INTERCOM LANGUAGE SVCS, 700.00 6/15/2012 12 -94 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 700.00 230845 7/31/2012 014492 INTONG, MARCI 2.50 2/17/2012 1048671 PRCS- REFUND COMM. REC 10/01 2.50 230846 7/3112012 012927 IRON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION MGMT, 377.67 6/30/2012 FLH1633 PD -06/12 RECORDS STORAGE 377.67 230847 7/31/2012 000718 JENNINGS EQUIPMENT INC, 230.84 6/12/2012 34155 PWFLT- SPRING TINES FOR GROOMER 230.84 230848 7/31/2012 009964 JG MCDONALD AND ASSOCIATES, 2,072.70 6/21/2012 1423 LAW- INSURANCE CONSULTANTAGI2- 2,072.70 230849 7/31/2012 004326 JIM'S AUTO REFINISH /COLLISION, 908.34 6/27/2012 13C41051 RM- PS6333 OFF LUBRANT; RM -PS; 908.34 230850 7/31/2012 005656 JIM'S DETAIL SHOP, 273.76 6/29/2012 13943F PD- VEHICLE CLEANING 136.88 7/9/2012 13953F PD- VEHICLE CLEANING 136.88 230851 7/31/2012 014491 JOHANSEN, DONNA 2.50 2/17/2012 1048672 PRCS- REFUND COMM. REC 10/01 2.50 230852 7/31/2012 010838 JOHNSON, STEPHEN G 7/8/2012 230853 7/31/2012 011472 KARIUKI, PAUL 7/17/2012 JULY 8, 2012 MO- CONFLICT DEFENDER SVC AG12- 07/17/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 2,315.00 2,315.00 100.00 100.00 Bank ofAmerica Page 6 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 230854 7/31/2012 003254 KESSELRING GUN SHOP INC, 957.04 7/6/2012 33385 PD -GLOCK PISTOLS - 936.23 7/6/2012 33386 PD- FIREARMS EQUIPMENT 20.81 230855 7/31/2012 011736 KIM, CHULJOON 400.00 7/10/2012 07/10/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 7/17/2012 07/17/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 7/2012012 07/20/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 7/24/2012 07/24/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 230856 7/31/2012 009001 KING COUNTY D.O.T., 4,130.75 7/10/2012 2004726 PWTR -Q2 2012 COMMUTE TRIP REDU 4,130.75 230857 7/31/2012 000125 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION, 57,832.39 5/31/2012 3079 -3081 RM -LIGHT REPAIR MILTON RD & 36 2,946.39 5/31/2012 3252 -3317 PWTR -05/12 DISC INV TRFFC^ 51,354.70 6/30/2012 7721 PWST- 06/12 ALGONA TS -SOLID WAS 42.53 6/30/2012 7721 PWST- 06/12 ALGONA TS -SOLID WAS 349.23 7/17/2012 2004855 HRCK -VOTER PAMPHLETS 2011 3,139.54 230858 7/31/2012 008328 KING COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH, 4,689.84 7/9/2012 2004684 CC -Q2 2012 KC LIQUOR TAX MENTA 4,689.84 230859 7/31/2012 014522 KLOTZ, SARAH 40.00 7/12/2012 1129779 PRCS- REFUND DANCE COSTUME COST 40.00 230860 7/31/2012 011578 KOHLER, MAILE 125.00 7/18/2012 1133364 PRCS- REFUND RWB 2012 VENDOR DE 125.00 230861 7/31/2012 009492 KPG INC, 21,422.53 7/13/2012 61912 PWST -10TH AVE @ CAMPUS DR. IMP 13,592.62 7/13/2012 62912 PWST - SCHOOL SAFETY ROUTES ^ 7,829.91 230862 7/31/2012 007278 KRUSEY, K.C. (CASEY) 250.00 7/19/2012 KRUSEY 2012 PD- MISSING CHILDREN INVEST. TR 250.00 230863 7/31/2012 009710 KUT KWICK CORPORATION, 1,308.16 6/29/2012 045914 SWM- MANDREL ASSEMBLY 1,247.35 6/27/2012 045878 SWM -GAS CAP 60.81 230864 7/31/2012 003399 KVASNYUK, NIKOLAY 137.50 7/10/2012 07/10/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 137.50 230865 7/31/2012 003803 LAIR- SWANSON, 1,361.59 6/16/2012 102337 FWCC- REPAIR OPERABLE PARTITION 1,361.59 230867 7/3112012 000096 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT, 11,993.11 7/16/2012 2781401 PKM- 03/28- 05/30/12 2501 349TH 47.76 7/16/2012 2798301 PKM- 03/26- 05/24/12 32800 14TH 22.10 7/16/2012 2830801 PKM- 03/27- 05/25/12 2700 340TH 84.84 7/16/2012 3042401 PWST- 03/28- 05/29/12 2500 336TH 22.10 7/16/2012 3341801 PWST - 04/03- 05/31/12 35826 16TH 22.10 7/16/2012 3341901 PWST- 04/03- 05/31/12 1559 S 356 22.10 7/16/2012 3519201 PWST - 03/29- 05/30/12 35601 21ST 75.44 7/16/2012 3568201 SWM- 03/22- 05/23/12 1026 S 351S 22.10 7/912012 2573402 PKM- 03/22 - 05/22/12 34800 14 PL 22.10 7/9/2012 99902 PKM- 03/22 - 05/23/12 411 348TH S 22.10 7/9/2012 3075201 PKM- 03/20- 05/18/12 1095 324TH 295.38 7/9/2012 3075201 PKM- 03/20- 05/18/12 1095 324TH 215.42 7/9/2012 3075301 PKM- 03/20- 05/18/12 1095 324TH 139.68 7/9/2012 3075301 PKM -03/20- 05/18/12 1095 324TH 33.26 7/9/2012 3075401 PKM- 03/20- 05/18/12 1095 324TH 177.74 7/9/2012 3075401 PKM- 03/20- 05/18/12 1095 324TH 82.14 7/9/2012 3238401 PWST- 03/21- 05/18/12 32001 PAC 368.56 7/9/2012 3266301 PKM- 03/22- 05/23/12 1540 SW 356 22.10 7/9/2012 3336201 PWST- 03/21- 05/18/12 32409 PAC 22.10 7/9/2012 3336301 PWST- 03/21- 05/21/12 32402 PAC 51.22 7/9/2012 3383601 PWST- 03/21- 05/21/12 33300 PAC 455.06 7/9/2012 3383701 PWST- 03/21- 05/21/12 32500 PAC 361.64 7/9/2012 3405101 CHB- 03/22- 05/22/12 600 S 333RD 51.22 7/9/2012 3405101 CHB- 03/22- 05/22/12 600 S 333RD 28.30 7/9/2012 3461301 FWCC- 03/22- 05/22/12 876 S 333R 1,182.06 7/9/2012 3461301 FWCC- 03/22 - 05122112 876 S 333R 1,868.85 7/9/2012 3474201 FWCC- 03122- 05/22/12 876 S 333R 22.10 7/9/2012 3474301 FWCC- 03/22- 05/22/12 876 S 333R 12.04 Bank of America Page 7 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 7/9/2012 3499201 PKM- 03/21 - 05/21/12 2220 S 333R 22.10 7/9/2012 3513001 PWST- 03/20- 05/18/12 33647 20TH 22.10 7/9/2012 3518001 PWST- 03/22- 05/23/12 35205 PAC 56.70 7/9/2012 3541001 PWST- 03/21 - 05/18/12 930 348TH 22.10 7/9/2012 3552401 PWST- 03/22- 05/23/12 35503 PAC 67.08 7/9/2012 3563701 PWST- 03/22- 05/23/12 101 S 348T 22.10 7/9/2012 101103 PKM- 03/22- 05/23/12 630 356TH S 129.30 7/912012 2913103 PKM- 03/22- 05/22/12 33325 8TH A 672.52 7/912012 2913103 PKM- 03/22 - 05/22/12 33325 8TH A 415.18 7/9/2012 2922203 PKM- 03/22 - 05/22/12 33325 8TH A 12.04 7/9/2012 2922503 PKM- 03/22- 05/22/12 33325 8TH A 261.30 7/9/2012 2926402 PKM - 03/23 -05/23/12 33914 19TH 163.90 7/9/2012 2926402 PKM- 03/23 - 05/23/12 33914 19TH 50.62 7/9/2012 2926501 PKM - 03/23- 05/23/12 33914 19TH 201.96 7/9/2012 2926501 PKM - 03/23 -05/23/12 33914 19TH 77.90 7/9/2012 2957001 PKM -03/20 -05/18/12 1095 324TH 22.10 7/9/2012 2961401 PWST- 03/21- 05/18/12 34727 PAC 22.10 7/9/2012 3050801 PKM - 03/20 -05/18/12 1095 324TH 4,000.40 230868 7/31/2012 012944 LANDON, DAVID 7/18/2012 1133366 PRCS- REFUND RWB 2012 VENDOR DE 125.00 230869 7/31/2012 004052 LEED, 6/23/2012 06231203 PD -50 ROUNDS GAS PROJECTILES- 1,269.60 6/28/2012 6281202 PD- HOLSTER 112.63 230870 7/31/2012 013498 LEXISNEXIS, 7/16/2012 1206484539 IT/LAW -06/12 WEST LAW SVC 306.60 230871 7/31/2012 011909 LEXISNEXIS RISK, 6/30/2012 1470204 - 20120630 PD -06/12 LEXIS NEXIS SVC 242.49 6/30/2012 1470204- 20120630 PD -06/12 LEXIS NEXIS SVC 242.49 230872 7/3112012 004594 LIM, VANNARAS 7/24/2012 07/24/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 230873 7/31/2012 000630 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC, 6/21/2012 161394 SWM- CONCRETE MIX 76.14 6/25/2012 161459 PKM -PRO GRO BLEND 41.00 230874 7/31/2012 014532 LONG FINE ARTS, 7/6/2012 36238 PRCS- REFUND RENT DEPOSIT 07/01 150.00 230875 7/3112012 014516 LONG, LENORA 2/17/2012 1048862 PRCS - REFUND HEALTH & FITNESS 0 2.35 230876 7/31/2012 014533 LOPEZ, LUZ 7/18/2012 1133510 PRCS- REFUND RENT DEPOSIT 07/14 500.00 230877 7/3112012 005339 LOWE'S HIW INC, 7/19/2012 23773 FWCC - TILER, BATTERIES, TAPE 43.62 7/19/2012 23773 FWCC - TILEX, BATTERIES, TAPE 145.24 7/19/2012 23773 FWCC - TILEX, BATTERIES, TAPE 9.24 7/19/2012 23773 FWCC - TILEX, BATTERIES, TAPE 6.77 7/6/2012 01806 PWST -TOTES FOR DIVE BANNERS 62.32 6/19/2012 01038 DBC- REPAIR TRASH GATE 7.21 7/2/2012 02640 PWST - TRUFUEL 59.92 7/2/2012 23932 SWM -CABLE TIES, DECK CORD, OUT 28.91 7/10/2012 02048 PKM- CONCRETE MIX, CHALK REEL, 192.98 6/28/2012 02993 PKM -DECK REPAIR SUPPLIES 73.54 230878 7/31/2012 005043 MACHINERY POWER & EQUIPMENT CO, 6/26/2012 32006737 -0001 SWM- BUCKET EXCAVATOR RENTAL 1,970.23 230879 7/31/2012 001004 MAILMEDIA DBA IMMEDIA, 6/27/2012 63017PA PRCS - POSTAGE FOR 2012 FALL CAT 5,181.00 230880 7/31/2012 009433 MAKSIMOV, YURI 7/17/2012 07/17112 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 230881 7/31/2012 014513 MALLOW, ANN 2/17/2012 1048667 PRCS- REFUND GEN. REC 06/99 2.50 230882 7/31/2012 014493 MARSHALL, MARILYN 2/17/2012 1048670 PRCS- REFUND GEN. REC 06/99 2.50 230883 7/31/2012 004182 MCDONOUGH & SONS INC, 7/10/2012 181897 CHB -07/12 PARKING LOT CLEANING 106.36 125.00 1,382.23 306.60 484.98 100.00 117.14 150.00 2.35 500.00 629.75 1,970.23 5,181.00 100.00 2.50 2.50 106.36 Bank ofAmerica Page 8 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 230884 7/31/2012 010256 MCMASTER -CARR, 53.41 6/13/2012 29065329 FWCC- SQUEEZE- HANDLE GRIP RETRI 53.41 230885 7/31/2012 014519 MCNEILL, PATRICIA 2.35 2/17/2012 1048861 PRCS- REFUND HEALTH & FITNESS 0 2.35 230886 7/31/2012 005176 MERINO STRAWS, BETTY 362.50 7/17/2012 07/17/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 7/24/2012 07/24/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 7/10/2012 07/10/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 162.50 230887 7/31/2012 001793 MICROFLEX INC, 1,294.74 7/3/2012 00020711 FI- 07/12 -06/13 TAX AUDIT PROG. 1,294.74 230888 7/31/2012 003170 MODERN SECURITY SYSTEMS INC, 114.81 6/25/2012 52080 PKM -Q3 2012 ALARM MONITORING S 114.81 230889 7/31/2012 014499 MONNIER, JENEFER 2.76 2/17/2012 1048678 PRCS- REFUND COMM. REC 02/02 2.76 230890 7/31/2012 014500 MORISETT, RON 2.00 2/17/2012 1048887 PRCS- REFUND COMM. REC 05/02 2.00 230891 7/31/2012 014496 MOSS, JENEE 2.35 2/17/2012 1048885 PRCS- REFUND HEALTH & FITNESS 0 2.35 230892 7/31/2012 011582 MURPHY, GREG 125.00 7/18/2012 1133365 PRCS- REFUND RWB 2012 VENDOR DE 125.00 230893 7/31/2012 000955 MUTUAL MATERIALS COMPANY, 90.81 7/2/2012 934440 PKM -GROUT & MORTAR 90.81 230894 7/31/2012 008904 NAZARCO, TATIANA 100.00 7/24/2012 07/24/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 230895 7/31/2012 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPANY, 328.35 7/2/2012 264862 PWFLT -FUSES 9.63 6/20/2012 264559 FWCC -VINYL HOSE 7.83 7/9/2012 265000 PKM -PAINT FOR GATE 51.41 7/13/2012 265150 SWM -FLOOR CLEANER 17.32 7/12/2012 265101 PARKS -REBAR - LAKOTA 13.70 7/11/2012 265054 PKM- CONCRETE MIX 38.76 7/11/2012 265067 PKM -GOAL POST PAINT - SAC 51.41 7/11/2012 265069 PARKS - FRAMER - LAKOTA 54.74 7/11/2012 265083 PKM -MOTOR OIL 26.66 7/10/2012 265009 PKM- BATTERIES, FACE SHIELD 35.23 7/10/2012 265011 PKM - WEEDEATER LINE 21.66 230896 7/31/2012 014506 NIEDERKROME, JENNY 2.00 2/17/2012 1048836 PRCS - REFUND OVERPAY 03/10 2.00 230897 7/31/2012 012847 NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE SVC OF WA, 5,817.34 6/1/2012 RC000053652 PKM -06/12 LANDSCAPE MAINT. AG1 5,011.60 6/29/2012 INV000032940 PKM -06/12 LANDSCAPE MAINT. AG1 805.74 230898 7/31/2012 010621 NORTHWEST PERMIT INC, 247.40 7/17/2012 12- 102655 REFUND CD-12-102655,102996,102997 R 170.40 7/17/2012 12- 103067 REFUND CD -12- 103067 REFUND DUPLICATE 3.00 7/17/2012 12- 103067 REFUND CD- 12- 103067 REFUND DUPLICATE 3.00 7/17/2012 12- 103067 REFUND CD- 12- 103067 REFUND DUPLICATE 71.00 230899 7/31/2012 003529 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, 240.00 6/28/2012 1844 -187 PD- PRE -EMPL PHYICAL EXAM 225.00 7/11/2012 1844 -189 PD- PRE - PLACEMENT TB TEST 15.00 230900 7/31/2012 011414 OFFICE DEPOT, 206.87 7/10/2012 1483736827 FWCC -COLOR PAPER 25.85 7/6/2012 615987913001 PD -07/12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 88.26 7/6/2012 615987913001 PD -07/12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5.47 7/6/2012 615987993001 PD -07/12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 27.99 7/2/2012 615671519001 FI- OFFICE SUPPLIES 59.30 230901 7/31/2012 002134 OLYMPIC LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION, 47.50 7/17/2012 12- 103204 REFUND CD -12- 103204 REFUND PERMIT NOT 3.00 7/17/2012 12- 103204 REFUND CD- 12- 103204 REFUND PERMIT NOT 3.00 7/17/2012 12- 103204 REFUND CD- 12- 103204 REFUND PERMIT NOT 41.50 230902 7/31/2012 004292 OLYMPIC SECURITY SERVICES INC, 2,662.80 6/30/2012 SI +0026294 MC -06/12 COURT SECURITY AG09 -1 2,662.80 230903 7/31/2012 007444 ORCA PACIFIC INC, 2,905.57 Bank of America Page 9 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 6/14/2012 056873 FWCC -POOL CHEMICALS SVC AG10 -1 444.63 6/21/2012 057021 FWCC -POOL CHEMICALS SVC AG10 -1 701.44 7/5/2012 057283 FWCC -POOL CHEMICALS SVC AG10 -1 694.21 6/28/2012 057162 FWCC -POOL CHEMICALS SVC AG10 -1 1,065.29 230904 7/31/2012 000504 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER, 51.44 7/12/2012 55214 PWST -ANT BAIT 38.30 7/16/2012 55298 PWST- RETURN AMB BLINE -30.65 7/18/2012 55341 PWST -GREEN CLEAN TABS 43.79 230905 7/31/2012 009920 OSAKA GARDEN SERVICE, 230910 7/31/2012 014494 PATTON, DEBORAH 24,193.01 7/1/2012 30003 PWST -06/12 ROW LANDSCAPE MAINT 24,193.01 230906 7/31/2012 001691 OTAK INC, 120.00 6/15/2012 000061200083 CD -CFC WETLAND MONITORING OVER 120.00 230907 7/31/2012 013235 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY, 52.04 7/5/2012 00064712 SWM -O -RINGS FOR INSPECTION TRA 52.04 230908 7/31/2012 006440 PAPE MACHINERY INC, 1,160.89 6/27/2012 2321783 PWFLT- REPAIR PROPEL PEDAL LINK 1,160.89 230909 7/31/2012 000885 PARKER PAINT MANUFACTURING CO, 71.46 7/16/2012 022015303 CD -PAINT SUPPLIES 71.46 230910 7/31/2012 014494 PATTON, DEBORAH 2.35 2/17/2012 1048750 PRCS- REFUND HEALTH & FITNESS 0 2.35 230911 7/31/2012 012903 PENNY, DAVID J 1,035.00 7/2712012 123 MO- CONFLICT DEFENDER SVC AG11- 1,035.00 230912 7/31/2012 006656 PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES INC, 202.53 7/3/2012 OA042547 PD -K9 DOG FOOD 202.53 230913 7/31/2012 012510 PETTY CASH - FI, 894.31 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 FI-PSFOA REGISTRATION DONNELLY 25.00 7/1712012 FI- 07/17/12 FI- MILEAGE TO SCORE/PSFOA MTG 26.40 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 SWM- WORKSHOP- STORMING THE GROU 43.58 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 PKM- BOOTS D PROCTOR 86.79 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 PW-SWM VELCRO 18.03 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 SWM- BACKGROUND SCENE FOR SALMO 11.34 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 CED -PER DIEM BREAKFAST 25.00 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 CD -WABO MTG L BAILEY 67.12 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 PRCS - 05/25- 06/27/12 D. LUSEBRI 32.76 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 HR -IPMA WORKSHOP SO, SHULL 35.00 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 SWM -LABEL MAKER 18.59 7/1712012 FI- 07/17/12 HR -ICE FOR LT TESTING ASSESS. 3.92 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 PKM- MULTI -TOOL 20.01 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 FI -TITLE FOR VEH 5172 28.00 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 SWM- TRAILER ITEMS 71.12 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 PVW/- PARKING FOR PSRC MTG SALLOU 12.20 7/1712012 FI- 07/17/12 SWM- GARGAGE BAGS /CLEANUP REDON 14.44 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 FI- REGISTRATION FOR 6164 34.25 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 CD- DIVERSITY EVENT -CANDY 30.16 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 FI- TITLES FOR 5131 AND 5162 56.00 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 SWM -STLK MTG REFRESHMENTS 6.58 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 SWM -N. LAKE LMD MTG REFRESHMEN 6.58 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 SWM -2 QTS MOTOR OIL 7.64 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 FI- PSFOA/SCORENALLEY COMM KRA 69.30 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 Fl-REGISTRATION FOR 5052 & 506 56.00 7/17/2012 FI- 07/17/12 FI- REGISTRATION FOR 6391 & 622 69.50 7/1712012 FI- 07/17/12 PRCS -DRESS FOR MESS SUPPLIES 19.00 230914 7/31/2012 011780 PETTY CASH -MC CHANGE FUND, 92.62 7/16/2012 MC- 07116/12 MC- FRAMES FOR ART CONTEST 06/2 75.30 7/1612012 MC- 07/16/12 MC- FRAMES FOR ART CONTEST 7/11 17.32 230915 7/31/2012 006241 PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT, 380.84 7127/2012 PD- 07/27/12 PD -HAND SANITIZER FOR PATROL- 70.96 7/27/2012 PD- 07/27/12 PD -FUEL FOR VEHICLE #6460- 10.12 7/27/2012 PD- 07/27/12 PD- WIRELESS KEYBOARD- 61.62 7127/2012 PD- 07/27/12 PD -KEY FOBB BATTERY FOR- 5.46 712712012 PD- 07127/12 PD -FOOD FOR DEPT SPONSORED- 52.51 7/27/2012 PD- 07/27/12 PD- BAGGAGE FEES LACKSON 45.00 7/27/2012 PD- 07/27/12 PD- BEVERAGES AND ICE FOR- 18.71 Bank of America Page 10 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 7/27/2012 PD- 07/27/12 PD -2012 ASA DUES JOHN CLARY 44.00 7/27/2012 PD- 07/27/12 PD -CITY BUSINESS MEMORABILIA- 38.26 7/27/2012 PD- 07/27/12 PD- REIMBURSE FOR PARKING- 10.00 7/2712012 PD- 07/27/12 PD- WSCJTC IN BURIEN P TOLLEFS 24.20 230916 7/31/2012 003537 PIERCE COUNTY SECURITY INC, 300.00 7/6/2012 244041 PKM -PARK CLOSING /SECURITYAG11 300.00 230917 7/31/2012 003537 PIERCE COUNTY SECURITY INC, 300.00 7/6/2012 243949 PKM -PARK CLOSING /SECURITYAG11 300.00 230918 7/31/2012 003537 PIERCE COUNTY SECURITY INC, 175.00 7/6/2012 244085 PKM -PARK CLOSING /SECURITYAG11 175.00 230919 7131/2012 003537 PIERCE COUNTY SECURITY INC, 150.00 7/6/2012 244088 PKM -PARK CLOSING /SECURITYAG11 150.00 230920 7/31/2012 003537 PIERCE COUNTY SECURITY INC, 150.00 7/6/2012 243995 PKM -PARK CLOSING /SECURITYAG11 150.00 230921 7/31/2012 003537 PIERCE COUNTY SECURITY INC, 150.00 7/6/2012 244043 CHB -FLEET PARKING LOT SECURITY 150.00 230922 7/31/2012 003537 PIERCE COUNTY SECURITY INC, 150.00 7/6/2012 243892 PKM -PARK CLOSING /SECURITYAG11 150.00 230923 7/31/2012 003537 PIERCE COUNTY SECURITY INC, 150.00 7/6/2012 244154 PKM -PARK CLOSING /SECURITYAGII 150.00 230924 7/31/2012 000808 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY, 256.44 6/27/2012 1813334 DBC -LED EXIT SIGNS 440.40 6/27/2012 1813349 CHB -DESK LAMP BULBS 34.20 6/11/2012 1813251 DBC- RETURN ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES - 218.16 230925 7/31/2012 014514 POKALE, SHEETAL 2.35 2/17/2012 1048884 PRCS- REFUND HEALTH & FITNESS 0 2.35 230926 7/31/2012 014531 POWERDMS INC, 20,000.00 6/28/2012 5070 PD- DMS /CALEASOFTWARE 20,000.00 230927 7/31/2012 010704 PROCTOR SALES, INC., 4,694.85 6/29/2012 0125675 -IN FWCC- BOILER REPAIRS 1,807.13 6/29/2012 0125783 -IN FWCC- BOILER REPAIRS 2,887.72 230928 7/31/2012 009960 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT, 7,343.73 7/11/2012 143658 PD -REPLC TASERS 3,336.62 7/5/2012 143133 PD -TASER ACCESSORIES 426.51 7/3/2012 143074 PD -REPLC TASERS 3,580.60 230929 7/31/2012 012361 PROVIDENCE COMMUNITY, 4,328.40 6/30/2012 JUNE 30, 2012 PD -06/12 SCAM, EM BASIC - INDI 1,342.40 6/30/2012 JUNE 30, 2012 A PD -06/12 HOME MONITOR - INDIGE 2,936.00 6/30/2012 JUNE 30, 2012 B PD -06/12 WORK CREW SCREENING 50.00 230930 7/31/2012 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC, 31,969.02 7/5/2012 033 - 810 -554 PWST -VAULT LID MOD. 348TH @ 1S 16,134.32 7/27/2012 131 - 066 -1002 PWTR -06/12 NON - METERED ELECT 15,661.13 7/17/2012 004 - 919 -1000 SWM -07/12 2101 324TH STORAGE E 43.20 7/30/2012 250- 275 -0389 PWTR -07/12 106 SW CAMPUS DR- 59.16 7/30/2012 250- 275 -0389 PWTR -07/12 106 SW CAMPUS DR- 71.21 230931 7/31/2012 008649 QUALITY WATER SERVICES, 65.59 6/30/2012 75995 PRCS- BOTTLE WATER SVC 65.59 230932 7/31/2012 010703 REALCHEM NORTHWEST, 465.46 6/29/2012 8838 FWCC- CORROSION INHIBITOR 465.46 230933 7/31/2012 014512 RECOR, JOANN 2.50 2/17/2012 1048668 PRCS- REFUND GEN. REC 06/99 2.50 230934 7/31/2012 010403 RENTSEN, OYUN 100.00 7/20/2012 07/20/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 230935 7/31/2012 014523 RICHARDSON, MELISSA 127.50 7/12/2012 1129782 PRCS- REFUND STLK CANOE RACE 06 127.50 230936 7/31/2012 001968 RICOH USA, INC, 116.66 7/5/2012 5023238418 FI -07/12 COPIERS /FAX MACHINES 5.83 7/5/2012 5023238418 FI -07/12 COPIERS /FAX MACHINES 59.50 7/5/2012 5023238418 FI -07/12 COPIERS /FAX MACHINES 51.33 230937 7/31/2012 012085 ROBERTSON, REBECCA 444.43 7/28/2012 ROBERTSON 2012 MC -DMCJA CONF. R ROBERTSON 287.61 7/28/2012 ROBERTSON 2012 MC -DMCJA CONF. R ROBERTSON 156.82 Bank ofAmerica Page 11 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 230938 7/31/2012 014511 ROBNETT, JEANNE 2.50 2/17/2012 1048669 PRCS- REFUND GEN. REC 06/99 2.50 230939 7/31/2012 005508 SAFAROVA-DOWNEY, ALM IRA 200.00 7/20/2012 07/20/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 6/26/2012 06/26/12A MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 230940 7/31/2012 003726 SAFEWAY STORE #1555, 189,97 7/24/2012 2210828 PRCS -F DUB POTLUCK SUPPLIES 30.11 7/5/2012 2210808 PRCS -TWIN HARBORS CAMP TRIP SU 31.07 6/14/2012 2151733 PRCS -DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 128.79 230941 7/31/2012 014497 SANDERS, LINDA 2.66 2/17/2012 1048687 PRCS - REFUND HEALTH & FITNESS 0 2.66 230942 7/31/2012 001048 SANDERSON SAFETY SUPPLY CO, 70.95 7/17/2012 12- 103189 REFUND CD- 12- 103189 REFUND OVERPAYMEN 70.95 230943 7/31/2012 014515 SANFORD, CHARLENE 2.00 2/17/2012 1048883 PRCS- REFUND CAMP 06/00 2.00 230944 7/31/2012 012537 SBCTC, 8,479.26 7/23/2012 36318 DBC- REFUND DEPOSIT, OVERPMT 07 8,479.26 230945 7/31/2012 011764 SBS LEASING PROG. OF DE LAGE, 109.92 7/9/2012 14404324 IT -07/12 CD COPIER RPR, MNT, S 109.92 230946 7/31/2012 010523 SBSOFAMERICA, 76.86 7/1/2012 29211 PKM -06/12 JANITORIAL SVCAGI0- 76.86 230947 7/31/2012 006418 SCHROCK, CATHY 121.97 7/10/2012 SCHROCK 2012 PD- COPCOM PARKING C SCHROCK 121.97 230948 7/31/2012 012981 SCORE -PDA, 148,358.34 7/23/2012 128 PD -07/12 SCORE PRISONER LODGIN 148,358.34 230949 7/31/2012 010351 SEATTLE SPORTS COMMISSION, 30,000.00 6/28/2012 JUNE 28, 2012 CD -2012 US OLYMPIC DIVE TEAM T 30,000.00 230950 7/31/2012 000351 SEATTLE TIMES, 16.00 6/27/2012 001170942 PRCS- SEATTLE TIMES SUBSCRIPTIO 16.00 230951 7/31/2012 009260 SGS GLASS COMPANY INC, 206,96 7/10/2012 1175 FWCC -REPLC DOOR GLASS 206.96 230952 7/31/2012 010456 SHORELINE VETERINARY, 1,061.45 6/26/2012 33726 PD -K9 ROSCOE DENTAL CARE 989.85 6/14/2012 33674 PD -K9 ROSCOE DENTAL CARE 71.60 230953 7/31/2012 011577 SONGCUAN, KRISTEN 125.00 7/18/2012 1133368 PRCS- REFUND RWB 2012 VENDOR DE 125.00 230954 7/31/2012 012400 SONNEN, JOE 86.74 7/23/2012 SONNEN 2012 PKM - MEDICAL DEDUCTIBLE SONNEN 86.74 230955 7/3112012 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 2,016.19 7/10/2012 652186 PRCS- SPRING /SUMMER BROCHURE 2,016.19 230956 7/31/2012 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 1,685.00 6/30/2012 474885 FWCC /PRCS - DISPLAY AD 842.50 6/30/2012 474885 FWCC /PRCS - DISPLAY AD 842.50 230957 7/31/2012 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 663.32 6/22/2012 639472 PWST -MARK TWAIN RFB LEGAL AD 490.28 6/1/2012 628970 SWM- FRESHWATER TAXONOMY SAMPLE 173.04 230958 7/31/2012 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 380.50 6/112012 632462 CDHS -CDBG LEGALAD 244.95 6/29/2012 644282 CDHS -CDBG LEGAL AD 135.55 230959 7/31/2012 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 162.95 6/1/2012 632130 CD -UHAUL NOA LEGAL AD 162.95 230960 7/31/2012 000285 SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE, 100.00 7/3/2012 00475 DBC -FIRE CODE PERMIT 100.00 230961 7/31/2012 001885 SPARKS CAR CARE, 3,314.80 7/2/2012 30492 PD -OLF 54.62 7/3/2012 30503 PD -REPLC LIGHT BULB 34.95 7/3/2012 30505 PD- WINDOW SWITCH 62.96 7/16/2012 30589 PD -OLF, SIGNAL LAMP, MOUNT TIR 135.11 7/16/2012 30589 PD -OLF, SIGNAL LAMP, MOUNT TIR 28.47 7/16/2012 30596 PD- INSTALL 2 TIRES 28.47 7/18/2012 30615 PD -OLF, WIPERS 102.00 7/1712012 30572 PD -REPLC A/C COMPRESSOR 945.66 Bank of America Page 12 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 7/17/2012 30577 PD -OLF, TRANSMISSION FILTER 363.14 6/29/2012 30474 PD -OLF 34.99 6/29/2012 30476 PD- INSPECT BROKEN WINDOW 65.70 7/9/2012 30540 PD -OLF 34.99 7/1012012 30553 PD- REPAIR TIRE 21.90 7/12/2012 30539 PD -OLF, SUSPENSION REPAIR - 1,097.90 7/12/2012 30566 PD -OLF, E -CLIP 172.13 7/13/2012 30574 PD -MOUNT NEW TIRE 14.24 7/13/2012 30575 PD- RECHARGE A/C SYSTEM 117.57 230962 7/31/2012 014505 SPEISER, JENNIFER 2/17/2012 1048836 PRCS- REFUND OVERPAY 08/08 2.00 230963 7/31/2012 003600 SPILLMAN TECHNOLOGIES INC, 7/16/2012 24170 PD- SECTOR INTERFACE SOFTWARE, 951.49 7/16/2012 24170 PD- SECTOR INTERFACE SOFTWARE, 49,114.51 230964 7/31/2012 004701 SPRINT, 6/21/2012 LCI- 143124 PD- SEARCH WARRANT CASE 12 -6807 45.00 230965 7/31/2012 007438 SPRINT /ROTHHAMMER INT'L, 6120/2012 82516A FWCC -FLOAT TUBES FOR LEISURE P 240.50 230966 7/31/2012 014502 STEBBINS, DEBRA 2/17/2012 1048679 PRCS- REFUND COMM. REC 02/02 2.76 230967 7/31/2012 014503 STEBERL, KATHY 2/17/2012 1048839 PRCS- REFUND HEALTH & FITNESS 0 2.35 230968 7/31/2012 003307 STERICYCLE INC, 7/18/2012 3001932340 PD -WASTE DISPOSAL FEES 22.27 230969 7/31/2012 003307 STERICYCLE INC, 6/30/2012 3001908618 PD- MEDICAL WASTE DISPOSAL SVC 11.14 230970 7/31/2012 003896 SUMMIT LAW GROUP, 7/2012012 57954 LAVWLEGALSVCAG11 -190- 1,158.75 230971 7131/2012 007710 SUPERIOR LINEN SERVICE, 7/9/2012 50998 DBC -LINEN SVC 22.86 230972 7/31/2012 007990 SYMBOLARTS LLC, 7/10/2012 0171226 -IN PD- BADGES 85.00 7/3/2012 0170938 -IN PD- BADGES 395.00 230973 7/31/2012 009523 SYSTEMS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY, 7/3/2012 19286 PD -RADAR REPAIRS 841.84 7/3/2012 19380 RM- PS6333 OFF LUBRANT, RM -PS; 367.58 3/13/2012 18140 PD- REMOVE EMERGENCY EQUIP 419.37 7/5/2012 19368 PD- INSTALL DASH LIGHTS 765.42 7/5/2012 19419 PD -REPLC SIREN 114.87 7/18/2012 19511 PD- INSTALL DASH & DECK LIGHTS 677.90 7/18/2012 19258 PD -NEW VEHICLE SETUP INSTALL L 737.03 7/18/2012 19507 PD- INSTALL FUSE 45.95 7/12/2012 19484 PD- REPAIR PIT WRAP BRACKET 114.87 7/12/2012 19486 PD -REPLC STROBE TUBE 45.95 7/12/2012 19498 PD -NEW VEHICLE SET UP EQUIP AD 2,817.05 7/12/2012 19499 PD -NEW VEHICLE SET UP EQUIP AD 2,817.05 7/12/2012 19255 PD- INSTALL LED LIGHTS 603.06 7/12/2012 19431 PD -NEW VEHICLE SET UP EQUIP AD 4,966.95 7/12/2012 19442 PD -NEW VEHICLE SET UP EQUIP AD 4,372.82 7/12/2012 19462 PD -REPLC DOOR LOCK 233.35 7/12/2012 19478 PD -SWAP OUT RADIO 45.95 230974 7/31/2012 009523 SYSTEMS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY, 7/12/2012 19482 PD- INSTALL USB HUB JAG GRANT 137.84 7/18/2012 19508 PD- INSTALL TOUGH HUB SECTOR GR 137.84 7/18/2012 19515 PD- INSTALL TOUGH HUB SECTOR G 137.84 7/18/2012 19519 PD- INSTALL TOUGH HUB SECTOR GR 137.84 4/30/2012 18870 PD- INSTALL USB HUB JAG GRANT 91.90 230975 7/31/2012 000588 TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES, 6/28/2012 100673510 PKM -06/12 SW DASH PT IRRIGATI 322.28 230976 7/31/2012 002176 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC, 7/12/2012 13915765 PWST -STEEL HEX NUTS & WASHERS 13.13 7/3/2012 13915214 PKM -HEX CAP SCREWS 22.34 2.00 50,066.00 45.00 240.50 2.76 2.35 22.27 11.14 1,158.75 22.86 480.00 19,987.01 643.26 322.28 35.47 Bank of America Page 13 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 230977 7/31/2012 006033 THE FAB SHOP LLC, 7,619.52 7/11/2012 17864 PWFLT -CAB RACK & WARNING LIGHT 3,601.71 7/11/2012 17865 PWFLT -CAB RACK & WARNING LIGHT 3,601.71 7/15/2012 17888 PWFLT -TAIL GATE 416.10 230978 7/31/2012 014526 THE MESOTHELIOMA APPLIED, 775.00 7/17/2012 MAY 2012 FWCC -MILES FOR MESO RUN 775.00 230979 7/31/2012 010320 THE ROBERT LARSON, 518.01 7/16/2012 DOCS302510 PD- REPLCAXEL 518.01 230980 7/31/2012 001424 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR INC, 680.02 7/1/2012 264427 PKM -Q3 2012 ELEVATOR MAINT SVC 680.02 230981 7/31/2012 014504 TIERNEY, CHARLENE 2.35 2/17/2012 1048838 PRCS- REFUND HEALTH & FITNESS 0 2.35 230982 7/31/2012 004218 TIMCO INC, 243.64 7/5/2012 227109 PWFLT- HYDRAULIC HOSES 137.84 7/2/2012 226992 PWFLT- HYDRAULIC HOSE & CRIMP 105.80 230983 7/31/2012 014507 TIMOTHY, RENEE 2.35 2/17/2012 1048834 PRCS- REFUND HEALTH & FITNESS 0 2.35 230984 7/31/2012 006169 TU, PAUL 100.00 7/20/2012 07/20/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 230985 7/31/2012 014517 TYSDAL -PARK, KAREN 2.00 2/17/2012 1048867 PRCS- REFUND GEN. REC 10/11 2.00 230986 7/31/2012 009557 ULINE, 102.94 7/17/2012 45247537 PD -CIS EVIDENCE BOXES 102.94 230987 7/31/2012 002426 UNITED GROCERS CASH & CARRY, 1,586.93 7/5/2012 191918 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 473.32 7/3/2012 190960 FWCC -KID ESCAPE SUPPLIES 19.92 7/11/2012 193256 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 85.08 7/13/2012 193949 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 153.15 6/29/2012 JUNE 29, 2012 PRCS -REC INC. DINNER SUPPLIES 131.22 7/9/2012 192851 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 724.24 230988 7/31/2012 003837 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, 56.82 7/7/2012 OOOOF6588V272 PD -UPS SVC TO TAAR INTL. 13.24 6/30/2012 OOOOF80F48262 IT -UPS SVC TO AMERICAN BARCODE 14.67 6/23/2012 OOOOF80F48252 FWCC -UPS SVC TO CHEMTROL 28.91 230989 7/31/2012 005019 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), 253.21 7/13/2012 103969465 -001 PWST- CONCRETE SAW RENTAL 253.21 230990 7/31/2012 011806 UNIVERSAL REFRIGERATION INC, 608.55 6/14/2012 S61972 FWCC /PRCS- REFRIGERATOR REPAIRS 304.28 6/14/2012 S61972 FWCC /PRCS- REFRIGERATOR REPAIRS 304.27 230991 7/31/2012 001805 VADIS NORTHWEST, 4,205.00 6/30/2012 17741 SWR -06/12 LITTER CONTROLAG07- 4,078.85 6/30/2012 17741 SWR -06/12 LITTER CONTROLAG07- 126.15 230992 7/31/2012 003563 VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER, 272,675.83 7/9/2012 0013245 PD -Q2 2012 ACCESS EMER DISPATC 2,514.33 7/6/2012 0013221 PD- 07/12 -08/12 EMER DISPATCH S 270,161.50 230993 7/31/2012 014509 VARGHESE, ANUP 2.50 2/17/2012 1048825 PRCS- REFUND OPEN BALANCE 09/05 2.50 230995 7/31/2012 011517 WA DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES, 50.00 6/27/2012 12 -30969 PD -WA L &I EXPLOSIVE LICENSE WE 50.00 230996 7/31/2012 003528 WA STATE CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 3,781.00 6/27/2012 2013 -1001 PD- MASTER INSTRUCTOR TRNG STRA 100.00 6/27/2012 2013 -1060 PD- HOMICIDE INVESTIGATION TRNG 100.00 6/28/2012 2013 -1117 PD -SUID TRNG LEITGEB 50.00 6/28/2012 2013 -1149 PD -OC SPRAY INSTRUCTOR TRNG OR 50.00 7/13/2012 2013 -1176 PD -BLEA TRNG ANTHOLT 3,331.00 7/13/2012 2013 -1225 PD- INTERROGATION TRNG LUBRANT 50.00 7/13/2012 2013 -1246 PD -CSI TRNG PURCELLA 50.00 7/2/2012 2013 -1088 PD- LEADERSHIP TRNG BUNK 50.00 230997 7/31/2012 005139 WA STATE DEPT OF RETIREMENT, 4,938.32 5/1/2012 00923092 FI- RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION -RC 4,766.64 511/2012 00923092 FI- RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION -R C 171.68 230998 7/31/2012 000280 WA STATE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, 28,429.49 Bank ofAmedca Page 14 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 7/14/2012 601 223 538 000 HR -Q2 2012 UI TAX 21,119.49 7/14/2012 601 223 538 000 HR -Q2 2012 UI TAX 7,310.00 230999 7/31/2012 004752 WA STATE LABOR & INDUSTRIES, 296.43 7/30/2012 2ND QTR 2012 FI -Q2 2012 L &I VOLUNTEER HRS 8.69 7/30/2012 2ND QTR 2012 FI -Q2 2012 L &I VOLUNTEER HRS 4.81 7/30/2012 2ND QTR 2012 FI -Q2 2012 L &I VOLUNTEER HRS 3.92 7/30/2012 2ND QTR 2012 FI -02 2012 L &I VOLUNTEER HRS 2.41 7/30/2012 2ND QTR 2012 FI -Q2 2012 L &I VOLUNTEER HRS 7.93 7130/2012 2ND QTR 2012 FI -Q2 2012 L &I VOLUNTEER HRS 1.18 7/30/2012 2ND QTR 2012 FI -Q2 2012 L &I VOLUNTEER HRS 3.38 7/30/2012 2ND QTR 2012 FI -Q2 2012 L &I VOLUNTEER HRS 63.93 7/30/2012 2ND QTR 2012 FI -Q2 2012 L &I VOLUNTEER HRS 11.17 7/30/2012 2ND QTR 2012 FI -Q2 2012 L &I VOLUNTEER HRS 53.81 7/30/2012 2ND QTR 2012 FI -02 2012 L &I VOLUNTEER HRS 7.07 7/30/2012 2ND QTR 2012 FI -Q2 2012 L &I VOLUNTEER HRS 95.43 7/30/2012 2ND QTR 2012 FI -02 2012 L &I VOLUNTEER HRS 10.80 7/30/2012 2ND QTR 2012 FI -Q2 2012 L &I VOLUNTEER HRS 0.54 7/30/2012 2ND QTR 2012 FI -02 2012 L &I VOLUNTEER HRS 21.36 231000 7/31/2012 000851 WA STATE PATROL, 660.00 7/3/2012 112010051 PD -REMIT CPL FEES COLLECTED 660.00 231001 7/31/2012 000851 WA STATE PATROL, 534.00 6/15/2012 00047686 IT /PD -Q2 2012 WSP ACCESS FEES 534.00 231002 7/31/2012 000851 WA STATE PATROL, 300.00 7/3/2012 112009708 HR -06/12 BACKGRND CHECK SVC 300.00 231003 7/31/2012 012538 WA. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, 1,185.00 6/30/2012 0612- 12- 12- KCWC -HQ PD -06/12 WORK CREWAG10 -166 1,185.00 231004 7/31/2012 014508 WAIHARO, RACHEL 2.50 2/17/2012 1048847 PRCS- REFUND OVER PAY. 01/11 2.50 231005 7/31/2012 006007 WALKER ACE HARDWARE, 105.01 7/17/2012 006321 DBC -LIGHT BULBS 42.65 7/18/2012 006324 DBC -LIGHT BULBS 37.19 7/12/2012 006312 PARKS - GARDEN SPRAYER - LAKOTA 25.17 231006 7/31/2012 014495 WARNER, JUDY 2.76 2/17/2012 1048680 PRCS- REFUND COMM. REC 02/02 2.76 231007 7/31/2012 000343 WASHDUP, LLC, 536.64 6/30/2012 113 PD -06/12 CAR WASH SERVICE 536.64 231008 7/31/2012 014530 WASHINGTON MAYFLOWER SOCIETY, 107.26 7/23/2012 36325 DBC- REFUND RENT DEPOSIT 07/22/ 107.26 231009 7/31/2012 012584 WASHINGTON TRACTOR INC, 7,117.50 6/18/2012 64742 PWST - MACHETTE TRACTOR RENTAL- 7,117.50 231010 7131/2012 012658 WATCH SYSTEMS LLC, 256.95 7/5/2012 16911 PD -RSO COMMUNITY NOTIFICATION 256.95 231011 7/31/2012 012044 WATT, JAMES 196.22 6/28/2012 2011 WATT MO -2011 UTILITY TAX REBATE 196.22 231012 7/31/2012 003500 WESCOM COMMUNICATIONS, 136.88 7/17/2012 21081 PD- CALIBRATE RADAR SYSTEM 136.88 231013 7131/2012 001241 WEST COAST AWARDS, 1,366.78 6/8/2012 50527 PRCS - SOCCER CHAMP T-SHIRTS AGI 251.85 6/2912012 50609 PRCS -STAFF & PROGRAM CLOTHING 137.15 6/27/2012 50617 PRCS -STAFF & PROGRAM CLOTHING 399.35 7/13/2012 50647 FWCC -SWIM TEAM CLOTHING 578.43 231014 7/31/2012 000541 WESTERN EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS, 41.15 6/22/2012 701836.2 SWM -BOLT KIT 36.85 6/25/2012 703437 SWM- CLEVIS PIN 4.30 231015 7/31/2012 001798 WESTERN PETERBILT INC, 577.58 7/11/2012 TA15141 PWFLT- REPAIR SIGNALS AND FLASH 577.58 231016 7/31/2012 010720 WILDER, SAMANTHA 790.95 7/1/2012 WECFW43 SWR -06/12 RECYCLING PROGRAM SV 790.95 231017 7/31/2012 005697 WORK- SPORTS & OUTDOORS, 78.17 7/3/2012 1- 1258717 PKM -WORK PANTS D PROCTOR 78.17 231018 7/31/2012 012305 XTREME SIGNS & GRAPHICS, 1,061.18 7/1312012 12 -786 PARKS- SCULPTURE PARK SIGNS 181.60 Bank of America Page 15 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 7/13/2012 12 -834 PKM -SIGNS 879.58 231019 7/31/2012 014525 YE, QIJIAN 60.00 7/12/2012 1129780 PRCS- REFUND GOLF SUMMER 2012 60.00 231020 7/31/2012 000694 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE COMPANY, 80.20 7/3/2012 68211394 CHB- FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 80.20 231021 8/2/2012 001004 MAILMEDIA DBA IMMEDIA, 745.17 7/30/2012 63136PA PRCS -ARTS COMMISION NEWSLETTER 745.17 231022 8/3/2012 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC, 46,688.38 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF -07/12 SAC PARK RR FIELD LI 1,650.66 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF -07/12 1STAVE & CAMPUS DR. 25.73 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKM -07/12 2410 S 312TH BEACH R 304.29 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKM -07/12 2410 S 312TH STORAGE 14.98 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKM -07/12 2410 S 312TH WOODSHO 81.61 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF -07/12 2645 S 312TH ANX -RR/ 1,664.85 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF -07/12 2645 S 312TH SEWER L 10.44 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF -07/12 2700 SW 340TH ALDERD 10.44 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF -07/12 28156 1/2 24TH HERIT 10.44 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF -07/12 31104 28TH AVE S HAU 13.60 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF -07/12 31104 28TH AVE S HAU 17.16 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKM -07/12 31132 28TH AVE STLK 359.87 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKM -07/12 31132 28TH AVE S STL 70.91 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKM -07112 31207 28TH AVE SKATE 10.44 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 DBC /KFT -07/12 3200 SW DASH PT 1,122.64 7119/2012 PARKS 2012 07 DBC /KFT -07/12 3200 SW DASH PT 552.94 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 DBC /KFT -07/12 3200 SW DASH PT 220.25 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 DBC /KFT -07/12 3200 SW DASH PT 108.48 7/1912012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF -07/12 32730 17TH AVE SW AL 10.44 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 CHB -07/12 33325 8TH AVE Z00453 9,876.96 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF -07/12 33914 19TH AVE SAG F 3,569.40 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF- 07/12 34915 4TH AVE MARKX 12.93 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF - 07/12 34915 4TH AVE S PALI 10.44 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF -07/12 600 S 333RD EVID. BL 499.12 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF -07/12 600 S 333RD EVID BLD 91.08 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 FWCC -07/12 876 S 333RD Z002806 13,950.27 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 FWCC -07/12 876 S 333RD 0008456 5,308.78 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 FWCC -07/12 876 S 333RD ST LIG 81.30 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKCP -07/12 S 324TH BLDG A- 3,734.40 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKCP -07/12 S 324TH BLDG B- 2,567.65 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF -07/12 7TH AVE HISTORICAL S 31.60 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF -07/12 7TH AVE HISTORICAL S 8.43 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF -07/12 21STAVE LAKOTA RR B 661.27 7/19/2012 PARKS 2012 07 PKF -07/12 2410 S 312TH STLK ST 24.58 231023 8/14/2012 000332 ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS INC, 125.00 7/28/2012 MMFWA00061300033 LAW - MNTHLY CHARGE - 7/31/12 62.50 7/28/2012 MMFWA00061300033 LAW- MNTHLY CHARGE - 7/31/12 62.50 231024 8/16/2012 011322 ABELLA, C. ANGELO 340.00 7/31/2012 07/31/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 8/8/2012 08/08/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 140.00 6/12/2012 06/12/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 231025 8/16/2012 012731 ACTION COMMUNICATIONS INC, 1,718.06 7/24/2012 1207250 PD -LAIRD TECHNOLOGIES SURGE- 62.41 7/24/2012 1207250 PD- POLYPHASER BULKHEAD- 9.86 7/1912012 1207218 PD- ANDREW 1/2" HELIAX COAXIAL 821.25 7/19/2012 1207218 PD- ANDREW PIPE TO PIPE CLAMP- 385.44 7/19/2012 1207218 PD- ANDREW CROSS OVER CLAMP- 197.10 7/19/2012 1207218 PD- ANDREW N -MALE CONNECTOR- 96.36 7/19/2012 1207218 PD -3M CLEAR SPRAY SEALER- 83.22 7/19/2012 1207218 PD- COMMSCOPE UNIVERSAL- 62.42 231026 8/16/2012 001856 ACTION SERVICES CORPORATION, 4,232.55 7131/2012 73516 PWST- STREET SWEEPING SVC AG10- 4,232.55 231027 8116/2012 013661 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC, 71.60 7/30/2012 12- 103250 RETURN CD- 12- 103250 PERMIT CANCELLED 71.60 231028 8/16/2012 009556 ADVANCING LEADERSHIP, 1,075.00 Bank ofAmerica Page 16 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 7/23/2012 1322 PD- ADVANCING LEADERSHIP SHUPP 1,075.00 231029 8/16/2012 000568 AGRI SHOP INC, 2,270.15 7/18/2012 23545/1 PKM- FERTILIZER 2,276.72 7/25/2012 23643/1 PKM- RETURN MAINT. SUPPLIES -6.57 231030 8/16/2012 000475 ALARM CENTERS /CUSTOM SECURITY, 75.00 7/18/2012 816497 CHB- 08/12 -10/12 ALARM MNTR SVC 75.00 231031 8/16/2012 009764 ALL ACCESS PRINTING & MAILING, 177.65 7/27/2012 28388 HR- BUSINESS CARDS 177.65 231032 8/16/2012 001285 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC, 201.27 7/13/2012 TM- 125309 SWM- MARKING PAINT 201.27 231033 8/16/2012 001012 AL'S TOWING, 193.82 7/29/2012 74765 PD- VEHICLE TOW CASE 12 -9327 193.82 231034 8/1612012 014534 ANDERSON, RICHARD 350.00 8/1/2012 AUGUST 1, 2012 PRCS- MAGICIAN FOR KIDS DAY EVE 350.00 231035 8/16/2012 014544 ANTHOLT, JUSTIN 100.00 7/24/2012 ANTHOLT 2012 PD- ACADEMY BOOT ALLOW. ANTHOLT 100.00 231036 8/16/2012 006211 AQUATECHNEX, INC., 2,997.56 7/1/2012 3591 SWM- AQUATIC PLANT MGMT STLKAG 1,478.25 7/1/2012 3592 SWM- AQUATIC PLANT MGMT N. LAKE 1,519.31 231037 8/16/2012 010530 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES, 156.59 7123/2012 655- 6301626 FWCC -FLOOR MATS SVC 35.59 7/23/2012 655- 6301625 FWCC -FLOOR MATS SVC 121.00 231038 8/16/2012 010530 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES, 101.82 7/31/2012 655- 6317392 DBC -LINEN SERVICE 44.33 7/24/2012 655- 6305433 DBC -LINEN SERVICE 57.49 231039 8/16/2012 013196 ARC IMAGING RESOURCES, 106.94 7/31/2012 960490 IT -OCE PLOTTER SYSTEM MAINTAG 32.08 7/31/2012 960490 IT -OCE PLOTTER SYSTEM MAINTAG 74.86 231040 8/16/2012 006119 BASELINE ENGINERRING, INC., 1,600.00 7/24/2012 13477 SWM -ON CALL SURVEYING AG10-082 1,600.00 231041 8/16/2012 011024 BASSETT, GRANT 97.02 7/25/2012 BASSETT 2012 PD -CIS UNIFORM ALLOW BASSETT 97.02 231042 8/16/2012 010964 BETTER BOUNCERS, 1,077.48 7/16/2012 3021 PRCS -KIDS DAY BOUNCER HOUSE 1,077.48 231043 8/16/2012 010185 BIRD, FERESIKAS 150.00 8/7/2012 08107/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 150.00 231044 8/16/2012 013146 BLUE LINE TRAINING, 229.00 8/2/2012 524 PD -CRIME SCENE CLASS C MICKELS 229.00 231045 8/16/2012 001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC, 928.76 7/31/2012 946603 PD- BOOTALLOW J ELLIS 87.59 7/18/2012 947244 PD- UNIFORM M DAHL - EVIDENCE TEC 481.68 7/19/2012 941957 -02 PD -NEW HIRE UNIFORM SHIRTANTH 97.40 7/27/2012 948379 PD- PEPPER SPRAY 249.00 7127/2012 950995 PD -ALTER VEST COVER A HWANG 13.09 231046 8/16/2012 014528 BOGAR, MICHAEL 150.00 7/20/2012 36304 DBC- REFUND RENTAL DEPOSIT 09/1 150.00 231047 8/16/2012 011289 BOWMAN, JASON 1,288.00 8/6/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC -07/12 PERSONAL TRAINER SV 1,288.00 231048 8/16/2012 004919 BRATWEAR, 284.85 7/2312012 6326 PD- REPAIR JUMPSUIT S SMITH 73.71 7/26/2012 6322 PD -REPLC BIKE PANTS MCCONNELL 211.14 231049 8/16/2012 000991 CASCADE COFFEE INC, 44.87 7/30/2012 202212209 HR- COFFEE & COFFEE SUPPLIES 44.87 231050 8/16/2012 012371 CASCADE ENGINEERING SERVICES, 794.40 7/26/2012 ML- 12072604289 PD -RADAR CALIBRATION & REPAIR 794.40 231051 8/16/2012 002351 CASCADE MOBILE MIX, 295.65 7/17/2012 28739 SWM- CONCRETE 295.65 231052 8/16/2012 001003 CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES, 8,212.54 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 EMERGENCY ASSIST. 2,983.73 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 EMERGENCY ASSIST. 228.81 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 B CDHS -02 2012 WOMENS HOMELESS S 3,000.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 A CDHS -Q2 2012 VOLUNTEER CHORE S 2,000.00 Bank of America Page 17 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 231053 8/16/2012 004676 CENTERSTAGE THEATRE ARTS, 5,860.00 8/10/2012 081012 CDED- SUMMER STOCK FESTIVALAG1 5,860.00 231054 8/16/2012 014418 CENTRAL LAKE ARMOR EXPRESS INC, 17,067.77 7/19/2012 0041785 -IN PD- BULLETPROOF VEST- 2,611.58 7/13/2012 IN- 0041131 PD -ARA SHOCK PLATE 7 X 10- 374.49 7/13/2012 IN- 0041131 PD- BULLETPROOF VEST- 722.70 7/13/2012 IN- 0041131 PD- BULLETPROOF VESTS- 13,262.64 7/13/2012 IN- 0041131 PD -ARA SHOCK PLATE 5 X 8- 96.36 231055 8/16/2012 000202 CENTURYLINK, 397.74 7/19/2012 1222556401 IT -06/12 LONG DISTANCE SVC 175.01 7/19/2012 1222556401 IT -06/12 LONG DISTANCE SVC 198.87 7/19/2012 1222556401 IT -06112 LONG DISTANCE SVC 23.86 231056 8/16/2012 004430 CESSCO -THE CUT &CORE STORE INC, 450.25 7/16/2012 367 SWM- REPAIR ASPHALT SAW 450.25 231057 8/16/2012 007368 CHIEF SUPPLY CORPORATION, 2,698.41 7/12/2012 104359 PD -CRIME SCENE TAPE & DOUBLE C 364.37 7/25/2012 108042 PD -DRUG TEST KITS 2,334.04 231058 8/16/2012 000665 CHILD CARE RESOURCES, 747.18 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 HOMELESS CHILD CA 747.18 231059 8/16/2012 701822 CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WA, 1,750.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 HEAD START PROG. 1,750.00 231060 8/16/2012 007443 CITIES INSURANCE ASSO OF WA, 152.18 7/24/2012 8179 RM- MALLINGER REIMB DIED; 7/24/1 152.18 231061 8/16/2012 010360 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, 755.28 7125/2012 CK #1233 PD -CLEA CONF. L JACKSON 555.28 7/25/2012 CK #1233 PD -CLEA CONF. L JACKSON 200.00 231062 8/16/2012 010173 CLARY, BRIGIT 500.00 7/24/2012 CLARY 2012 PD- CLOTHING ALLOW. B CLARY 500.00 231063 8/16/2012 003752 COASTWDE SUPPLY DBA, 2,368.02 7/24/2012 T2450508 -1 CHB- JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 21.55 7/24/2012 T2453950 CHB - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1,306.62 7/10/2012 T2447518 -1 PKM- JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 108.23 7/23/2012 T2450508 CHB- JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 75.33 7/13/2012 T2442394 PKM- JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 3813 7/17/2012 T2447518 -2 PKM- JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129.44 7/17/2012 T2451623 PKM- JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 688.72 231064 8/16/2012 007591 COMMERCIAL SPACE ONLINE INC, 200.00 8/1/2012 77772 CD -08/12 PROPERTY DATABASE SVC 100.00 7/1/2012 77560 CD -07/12 PROPERTY DATABASE SVC 100.00 231065 8/16/2012 010910 COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS, 5,000.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -02 2012 CIS MENTORING PRO 2,500.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 A CDHS -02 2012 CIS MENTORING PRO 2,500.00 231066 8/16/2012 000721 CORLISS RESOURCES INC, 431.36 7/11/2012 331853 PKM- CONCRETE SUPPLIES 96.50 7/12/2012 331949 PKM- CONCRETE SUPPLIES 334.86 231067 8/1612012 000771 COSTCO /HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, 3,183.46 7/26/2012 JULY 2012 PD- PATROL SUPPLIES 577.78 7/26/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -RWB TRAIL MIX 303.94 7/26/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -RWB VOLUNTEER PIZZA 309.83 7/26/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -RWB VOLUNTEER SNACKS 3.75 7/26/2012 JULY 2012 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 826.47 7/26/2012 JULY 2012 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 78.65 7126/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC- RESALE ITEMS 67.95 7/26/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS- SPECIAL OLYMPICS CAKE 35.98 7/26/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 384.34 7/26/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 607.78 7/26/2012 JULY 2012 PD- PATROL SUPPLIES -13.01 231068 8/16/2012 009696 CRESTWOOD ANIMAL HOSPITAL, 41.06 7/31/2012 24567 PD -K9 ROSCOE MEDICAL CARE 41.06 231069 8/16/2012 000555 CRISIS CLINIC, 1,500.00 817/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 24 HOUR CRISIS LI 750.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 A CDHS -Q2 2012 TEEN LINK PROG AG 750.00 Bank of America Page 18 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 231070 8/16/2012 008766 CRYSTAL CARPET CARE, 248.00 7/23/2012 13048 DBC- CARPET CLEANING 248.00 231071 8/16/2012 010015 CUTHBERT, GAIL 2,413.31 8/6/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC -07/12 PERSONAL TRNG SVCS 2,413.31 231072 8/16/2012 004606 DATEC INCORPORATED, 1,703.82 7/31/2012 30250 IT -PD GJ - GENERAL DYNAMICS IT 1,703.82 231073 8/16/2012 701985 DAWN, 6,750.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 CRISIS LINE SVC A 500.00 817/2012 2ND QTR 2012 A CDHS -Q2 2012 COMMUNITY ADVOCAC 1,250.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 B CDHS -Q2 2012 CONTINUUM HOUSING 5,000.00 231074 8/16/2012 004461 DESTINATION HARLEY- DAVIDSON, 631.43 7/25/2012 43729 PD -OLF, BRAKES, TIRE 309.55 7/25/2012 43729 PD -OLF, BRAKES, TIRE 321.88 231075 8/16/2012 008039 DMX MUSIC, 66.18 8/1/2012 50388721 IT -08/12 ALL DIGITAL MUSIC 66.18 231076 8/16/2012 005341 DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA 275.00 8!7/2012 08/07/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 175.00 7/31/2012 07/31/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 231077 8/16/2012 012752 DYNAMIC FAMILY SERVICES, 2,500.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 CHILDREN - SPECIAL 2,500.00 231078 8/16/2012 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DBA), 1,064.66 8/6/2012 1087537 PWFLT- ALIGNMENT, BALL JOINTS 388.62 7/23/2012 1087536 PWFLT-OLF 51.41 7/23/2012 1087541 PWFLT -OLF 57.99 7/21/2012 1087514 PWFLT -OLF 78.71 7/21/2012 1087516 PWFLT -OLF 78.71 7/18/2012 1087478 PWFLT TOW, REPLC STARTER 409.22 231079 8/16/2012 012666 EDD, DALE 108.50 7/21/2012 JULY 21, 2012 PRCS- 1STAID /CPR INSTRUCTOR AG 108.50 231080 8/16/2012 004344 EMERGENCY FEEDING PROGRAM, 1,250.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 HUNGER RELIEF PRO 1,250.00 231081 8/16/2012 001046 EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SVC, 21.13 7/17/2012 7230417 PD -07/12 CREDIT REPORTS 21.13 231082 8/16/2012 000328 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA), 13,587.68 7/31/2012 0352406 PD- 07/16/12 - 07/31/12 VEHICLE F 13,196.74 7/31/2012 0352406 PD- 07/16112- 07/31/12 VEHICLE F 865.38 7/31/2012 0352406 PD- 07/16/12 -07/31/12 FUEL CRIED - 474.44 231083 8/16/2012 002899 ESAADOLFSON, 1,050.00 7118/2012 98439C CD- 005 -05552 SOBOL REVIEW 1,050.00 231084 8/16/2012 014373 ESBENSHADE, DANIEL 853.80 8/6/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC- PERSONELTRNG SVC AGI2 -05 853.80 231085 8/16/2012 001748 EVERSON'S ECONO -VAC INC, 1,107.00 7/19/2012 069432 PKM - VACTOR POTHOLING & STORM L 553.50 6/30/2012 069370 PKM - VACTOR POTHOLING SAC PARK- 553.50 231086 8/16/2012 007137 EVIDENT CRIME SCENE PRODUCTS, 1,748.00 7/13/2012 69740A PD -CIS SUPPLIES CASES 12 -7833, 1,492.00 7/25/2012 69740B PD -CSI COVERALLS 256.00 231087 8/16/2012 011726 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS, INC, 148.39 7/13/2012 5090560 PKM -PVC PIPE & PRIMER 123.02 7/16/2012 5099181 PKM -PVC BUSHINGS 25.37 231088 8/1612012 006645 EXPRESS TOWING LLC, 193.82 7/26/2012 14005 Pd- VEHICLE TOW SVC 19382 231089 8/16/2012 005820 FASTSIGNS, 383.34 7/27/2012 370 -19233 PD- ANIMAL SVCS "HOT DOG" SIGN 383.34 231090 8/16/2012 003130 FBINAA WASHINGTON CHAPTER, 189.00 8/9/2012 WILSON REGISTER PD- FBINAA CONF. B WILSON 189.00 231091 8/16/2012 012942 FEDERAL WAY AUTO GLASS, 1,533.02 8/2/2012 1000947 PD -REPLC WINDSHIELD 273.75 8/212012 1000948 PD- VEHICLE CLEANING 54.75 7/30/2012 1000944 PD -REPLC WINDSHIELD 273.75 7/31/2012 1000946 PD -REPLC WINDSHIELD 246.38 7/17/2012 1000931 PD -REPLC BACK WINDOW 383.25 Bank of America Page 19 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 7/21/2012 1000938 PD- VEHICLE CLEANING 82.13 7/21/2012 1000939 PD- VEHICLE CLEANING 136.88 7124/2012 1000941 PD- VEHICLE CLEANING 82.13 231092 8/16/2012 002644 FEDERAL WAY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB, 2,047.34 8/8/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 SAFE ZONE FOR KID 2,047.34 231093 8/16/2012 000229 FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER COMMERCE, 280.00 8/2/2012 080212C CC /CD /MC /PD- CHAMBER LUNCHEON- 80.00 8/2/2012 080212C CC /CD /MC /PD- CHAMBER LUNCHEON- 20.00 8/2/2012 080212C CC /CD /MC /PD- CHAMBER LUNCHEON- 20.00 8/2/2012 080212C CC /CD /MC /PD- CHAMBER LUNCHEON- 20.00 8/2/2012 080212C CC /CD /MC /PD- CHAMBER LUNCHEON- 20.00 8/2/2012 080212C CC /CD /MC /PD- CHAMBER LUNCHEON- 20.00 8/2/2012 080212C CC /CD /MC /PD- CHAMBER LUNCHEON- 20.00 8/2/2012 080212C CC /CD /MC /PD- CHAMBER LUNCHEON- 20.00 8/2/2012 080212C CC /CD /MC /PD- CHAMBER LUNCHEON- 60.00 231094 8/16/2012 000652 FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY, 5,875.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 RENT ASSIST. /SHEL 3,250.00 8/712012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 RENT ASSIST. /SHEL 2,625.00 231095 8/16/2012 001183 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 72.45 7/27/2012 ARO 8799 SWM- CAMELOT ELEMENTARY FIELD T 72.45 231096 8/16/2012 001893 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 16,058.52 8/6/2012 SIF -JULY 2012 FI -07/12 SCHL IMPACT FEE & INT 16,056.00 8/6/2012 SIF -JULY 2012 FI -07/12 SCHL IMPACT FEE & INT 2.52 231097 8/16/2012 007547 FEDERAL WAY SENIOR CENTER, 12,421.00 8/8/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 ADULT DAY CARE AG 3,710.50 8/8/2012 2ND QTR 2012 A CDHS -Q2 2012 NUTRITION PROGRAM 5,000.00 818/2012 2ND QTR 2012 B CDHS -02 2012 ADULT DAY CARE AG 3,710.50 231098 8/16/2012 012626 FERGUSON, ERIC W 545.00 7/24/2012 053 MO- CONFLICT DEFENDER SVC AG12- 545.00 231099 8/16/2012 013290 FIRST STUDENT, INC, 5,224.00 7/25/2012 229 -C- 049374 PRCS -DAY CAMP FIELD TRIP BUS S 1,449.00 7/18/2012 229 -C- 049253 PRCS -DAY CAMP FIELD TRIP BUS S 3,775.00 231100 8/16/2012 002664 FLEX -PLAN SERVICES INC, 213.30 7/31/2012 199882 HR -04/12 FLEX PLAN ADM SVC AG1 213.30 231101 8/16/2012 008860 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA, 3,088.18 7/19/2012 4058337 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 14.35 7/25/2012 4070447 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 2,763.25 7/27/2012 4077452 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 310.58 231102 8/16/2012 001637 FRY'S WELDING INC, 136.88 7/17/2012 14453 PKM- REPAIR STLK PARK BLEACHERS 136.88 231103 8/16/2012 000923 FURNEY'S NURSERY INC, 236.52 7/18/2012 1 -70906 DBC- HANGING BASKETS 236.52 231104 8/16/2012 008755 FUSION, 2,500.00 8/8/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 TRANSITIONAL HOUS 2,500.00 231105 8/16/2012 011650 GEBREMICHAEL, MERIAM 125.00 817/2012 08/07/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 125.00 231106 8/16/2012 004578 GENE'S TOWING INC, 193.82 7/6/2012 395093 PD- VEHICLE TOW SVC 193.82 231107 8/16/2012 001478 GEOLINE POSITIONING SYSTEMS, 532.17 7/6/2012 315010 PD -TOTAL STATION SURVEY EQUIP 532.17 231108 8/16/2012 010940 GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE CNTR, 853.27 8/1/2012 900136141 PD- 2NEWTIRES 238.50 7/24/2012 900126981 PD -1 NEWTIRE 137.77 7/27/2012 900131686 PD4 NEWTIRES 477.00 231109 8/1612012 002547 GRAINGER INC, 117.06 121712011 9702306441 FWCC- RETURN SCREWDRIVER SET -51.47 7/18/2012 9879117928 FWCC- ELECTRIC BALLAST, DEMING 120.83 12/712011 9702306458 FWCC- RETURN DP CONTACTOR -76.70 4/11/2012 9800587868 FWCC -RUN CAPACITOR 15.48 7/3/2012 9868230203 PRCS -RWB BARRIER FENCE 108.92 231110 8/16/2012 010738 GREEN EFFECTS, INC, 4,372.56 7/1/2012 38252 FWCC -06112 LANDSCAPINGAG08 -06 2,186.28 Bank ofAmerica Page 20 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 8/2/2012 38605 FWCC -07/12 LANDSCAPINGAG08 -06 2,186.28 231111 8/16/2012 000671 H D FOWLER COMPANY, 157.43 7/18/2012 13174259 PKM- BATTERY, FIELD TRANSMITTER 199.15 7/20/2012 C280555 PKM- RETURN PVC HANDPUMP HOSE -41.72 231112 8/16/2012 011444 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF, 101,105.70 7/26/2012 5 CDHS-NSP3 PROGRAM AG11-172- 101,105.70 231113 8/16/2012 011444 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF, 3,236.91 6/30/2012 2 CDHS -NSP3 PROGRAM AG11 -172- 3,236.91 231114 8/16/2012 005044 HATFIELD, BRETT 100.00 7/26/2012 HATFIELD 2012 PD -BIKE SHOES B HATFIELD 100.00 231115 8/16/2012 003841 HEAD - QUARTERS PTS, 1,341.00 7/10/2012 25210 PRCS -RWB SANICAN SERVICES 1,341.00 231116 8/16/2012 001127 HEALTHPOINT, 11,488.50 8/8/2012 2ND QTR 2012 B CDHS -02 2012 DENTAL CARE PROG. 2,506.75 8/8/2012 2ND QTR 2012 C CDHS -Q2 2012 DENTAL CARE PROG. 2,506.75 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 DENTAL CARE PROG. 3,975.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 A CDHS -Q2 2012 MEDICAL CARE PROG 2,500.00 231117 8/16/2012 010431 HERRERA, MATT 100.00 8!7/2012 HERRERA 2012 CD- MEDICAL DEDUCTIBLE HERRERA 100.00 231118 8/16/2012 003985 HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT, 622.26 7/13/2012 19221 -00 PWST -07/12 27454 PAC HWY IRRIG 622.26 231119 8/16/2012 002477 HOME DEPOT -DEPT 32- 2500780030, 725.14 7/27/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -RWB SAFETY BARRIER FENCE 85.31 7/27/2012 JULY 2012 SWM- UTILITY SAFETY KNIFE, TAPE 72.78 7/27/2012 JULY 2012 PKM -STEEL WIRE REMESH MATS 7.88 7/27/2012 JULY 2012 PKM -STEEL WIRE REMESH MATS 100.14 7/27/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC- SANDING BELTS, PLASTIC BA 8.94 7/27/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC- SANDING BELTS, PLASTIC BA 143.37 7/27/2012 JULY 2012 SWM- STRETCH WRAP 118.11 7/27/2012 JULY 2012 PD -TOTE BOXES AND KEYS 163.78 7/27/2012 JULY 2012 PD -TOTE BOXES AND KEYS 24.83 231120 8/16/2012 009189 HUNG, ESTHER 150.00 7/31/2012 JULY 31, 2012 PD- INTERPRETER SVC CASE 12 -917 150.00 231121 8/16/2012 000367 IIMC -INT'L INST OF MUN CLERKS, 325.00 8/6/2012 15531 HRCK -2012 IIMC DUES COURTNEY 75.00 8/6/2012 15948 HRCK -2012 IIMC DUES MCNEILLY 175.00 8/612012 21887 HRCK -2012 IIMC DUES ROE 75.00 231122 8/16/2012 001240 INRO CONSULTANTS INC, 662.60 8/1/2012 28729 IT -PW EMM2 SOFTWARE SUPPORTAG 662.60 231123 8/16/2012 005757 INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY, 13,478.56 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 A CDHS -Q2 2012 PACT PROGRAM AG12 4,585.47 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 B CDHS -Q2 2012 PACT PROGRAM AG12 7,975.84 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 PACT FROG. AG11 -0 917.25 231124 8/16/2012 004957 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF, 125.00 8/1/2012 37053 PD -2012 CHAPLAIN DUES DAUSTIN 125.00 231125 8/16/2012 012927 IRON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION MGMT, 2,535.23 7/31/2012 FPV7029 HRCK -07/31 RECORDS STORAGE SVC 2,893.92 3/31/2001 9536396 HRCK- CREDIT FOR 2002 -2012 SVC - 358.69 231126 8/16/2012 011526 JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE, 1,625.00 8/712012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 REFUGEE/IMMIGRANT 1,625.00 231127 8/16/2012 004326 JIM'S AUTO REFINISH /COLLISION, 60.22 8/7/2012 AUGUST 2012 PD- VEHICLE REPAIRS 60.22 231128 8/16/2012 012611 JOHN'S CLEANING SERVICES INC, 888.05 7/30/2012 911 PD -DRY CLEANING SVC AG11 -001- 888.05 231129 8/16/2012 011472 KARIUKI, PAUL 100.00 8/7/2012 08/07/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 231130 8/16/2012 011491 KENT YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES, 3,000.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 CLINICAL SVCS AG1 3,000.00 231131 8/16/2012 011736 KIM, CHULJOON 300.00 8/712012 08/07/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 7/31/2012 07/31/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 7/27/2012 07/27/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 Bank of America Page 21 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 231132 8/16/2012 012761 KING COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION, 1,875.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 COMMUNITY LEGAL S 1,875.00 231133 8/16/2012 001259 KING COUNTY CRIME VICTIMS FUND, 1,552.10 8/3/2012 JULY 2012 FI -7/12 REMIT CRIME VICTIM FEE 1,552.10 231134 8/16/2012 000125 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION, 8,366.25 5/31/2012 3382 -3399 PWTR -08/12 DISC INVOICE TRFFC- 5,172.70 5/31/2012 3382 -3399 PWST -08/12 DISC INVOICE OFF RA 1,630.71 5/31/2012 3382 -3399 PW -08/12 DISC INVOICE FWPS 71.04 5/31/2012 3382 -3399 RM -08/12 DISC INVOICE LIGHT RE 1,491.80 231135 8/16/2012 000376 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION, 7,159.34 7/24/2012 WLRD WRIA- #1001364 SWM -WRI WATERSHED BASINS AG #06 7,159.34 231136 8/16/2012 005568 KING COUNTY FLEET ADM DIVISION, 5,892.97 7/10/2012 205927 PWFLT -MOWER REPAIR 3,548.25 7/10/2012 205927 SWR- 'ADOPT A ROAD' LITTER BAGS 2,344.72 231137 8/16/2012 003898 KING COUNTY RADIO, 8,797.53 7/20/2012 00431274 PD -RADIO MAINT /REPAIR 554.62 7/21/2012 6496 IT -PD RADIO MAINT /REPAIR 8,242.91 231138 8/16/2012 000241 KING COUNTY SEXUAL ASSAULT, 7,500.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 SEXUAL ASSAULTS S 7,500.00 231139 8/16/2012 000267 KING COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, 7,949.10 7/10/2012 12 -177 IT -PD RAIN "REGIONALAREA INFO 7,949.10 231140 8/16/2012 006848 KOREAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF, 150.00 8/3/2012 36389 DBC- REFUND RENTAL DEPOSIT 07/1 150.00 231141 8/16/2012 007278 KRUSEY, K.C. (CASEY) 165.00 7/31/2012 KRUSEY 2012 PD- MISSING CHILDREN TRNG KRUSE 165.00 231142 8/16/2012 002464 LAKE KILLARNEY IMPROVEMENTS, 500.00 7/25/2012 2012 WEED CONTROL PKM -2012 LK KILLARNEY WEED CON 500.00 231143 8/16/2012 000096 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT, 825.28 7/23/2012 1014202 PKM - 04/13- 06/13/12 312 DASH PT 23.34 8/6/2012 2592802 PKM- 04/12 - 06/12/12 1210 333 ST 129.30 7/23/2012 1014202 PKM- 04/13- 06/13/12 312 DASH PT 81.38 7/23/2012 1768602 DBC - 04/13 - 06/13/12 3200 DASH P 253.25 7/23/2012 1768602 DBC- 04/13- 06/13/12 3200 DASH P 124.73 7/23/2012 2781501 PKM- 04/13- 06/14/12 31200 DASH 22.10 7/23/2012 2906301 PKM- 04/13- 06/13/12 312 DASH PT 22.10 7/23/2012 3059601 PKM- 07/10- 06/11/12 3200 349TH 25.56 7/23/2012 3131501 PKM- 05/23- 07/23/12 30655 21ST 5.64 8/13/2012 1941803 CDED- 05/02- 06/29/12 31600 20 A 125.84 8/13/2012 1946803 CDED- 05/02- 06/29/12 31600 20 A 12.04 231144 8/16/2012 001963 LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC, 404,867.37 8/1/2012 AG 12-048 #4 PWTR -2012 ASPHALT OVERLAY - 404,867.37 231145 8/16/2012 014554 LAND -RON INC, 55.00 8/6/2012 01 -88898 REFUND FI -01 -88898 REFUND DUPLICATE P 55.00 231146 8/16/2012 014552 LARSEN, KRISTINE 95.00 8/612012 1143599 PRCS- REFUND GOLF LESSONS 2012 95.00 231147 8/16/2012 003343 LASER LABS INC, 451.00 7/13/2012 12606 PD -TENT METER & REPAIR PARTS 451.00 231148 8/16/2012 003157 LES SCHWAB TIRE CTRS OF WA INC, 49.40 6/26/2012 37800025555 PWFLT - NEWTIRE 49.40 231149 8/16/2012 014553 LION MOTORS LLC, 75.00 8/6/2012 01 -88925 REFUND FI- REFUND LOCATION IS IN TACOM 75.00 231150 8/16/2012 014557 LIU, TAO 1,163.30 7/31/2012 12 -01- 352 -756 RM -PW ST 12 -01- 352 -756 T LIU 1,163.30 231151 8/16/2012 000630 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC, 735.26 7/2/2012 161677 PRCS -RWB SAND 145.29 7/2/2012 161682 PRCS -RWB SAND 589.97 231152 8/16/2012 005339 LOWE'S HIW INC, 791.12 7/3/2012 01668 PRCS -RWB SAFETY FENCE 232.90 7/24/2012 23640 PKM -STLK DRINKING FOUNTAIN REP 33.95 7/30/2012 02253 PWST -FACE SHIELD, GLOVES 271.42 7/3012012 11141 PD -CSI BOLT CUTTERS, DUCT TAPE 108.56 8/4/2012 23480 PD -TOUCH UP PAINT 13.93 Page 22 of 32 Bank ofAmerica Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 7/19/2012 02433 PWST - TRUFUEL 44.94 7/18/2012 02361 CHB- GARBAGE BAGS, GROUT SEALER 49.53 7127/2012 02881 PKM -REPLC CHROME ROLLERS 35.89 231153 8/16/2012 012744 MAENG, YOUNG JIN 71.17 2/16/2012 2011 MAENG MO -2011 UTILITY TAX REBATE 71.17 231154 8/16/2012 011938 MAIPI, XAVIER 100.00 8/7/2012 08/07/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 231155 8/16/2012 004182 MCDONOUGH & SONS INC, 131.40 7/9/2012 182132 PKM- 07/06/12 PARKING LOT CLEAN 131.40 231156 8/16/2012 010256 MCMASTER -CARR, 399.44 6/25/2012 30105197 FWCC -STEEL EYEBOLT 367.53 7/18/2012 32078148 FWCC - TUBING AND FITTINGS 31.91 231157 8116/2012 012823 MILES RESOURCES LLC, 213.33 7/16/2012 218827 SWM- ASPHALT MIX 213.33 231158 8/16/2012 008366 MILLER, KEN 240.00 615/2012 MILLER 2012 PW-APWA CONF. K MILLER 240.00 231159 8/16/2012 012408 MT VIEW LOCATING SERVICES LLC, 240.00 7/9/2012 14414 PKM - LOCATING POWER CONDUIT SVC 240.00 231160 8/16/2012 000228 MULTI - SERVICE CENTER, 21,276.88 8/712012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 GENERAL EDUCATION 3,001.88 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 B CDHS -Q2 2012 EMERGENCY SHELTER 9,500.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 A CDHS -Q2 2012 FOOD & CLOTHING B 8,775.00 231161 8/16/2012 014536 NAKANO ASSOCIATES LLC, 1,860.00 6/30/2012 5833 CDED -AMC SITE PLANNING AGI2 -09 1,860.00 231162 8/16/2012 001052 NAPAAUTO PARTS, 123.90 7/17/2012 226184 PWFLT -MOTOR OIL 123.90 231163 8/16/2012 003330 NATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION, 360.57 5/10/2012 213013 PD -NRB -SAFE: MCGRUFF RED 360.57 231164 8/16/2012 014555 NATTO, JAG 50.00 8/6/2012 1143600 PRCS- REFUND BASKETBALL CAMP 07 50.00 231165 8/1612012 012844 NAVOS, 1,941.02 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 EMPLOYMENT SVC. P 1,941.02 231166 8/16/2012 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPANY, 148.37 8/2/2012 265708 SWM -FLAG TAPE 11.78 7/20/2012 265358 PWST -MISC HARDWARE 1.23 7/31/2012 265660 SWM -CAR WASH 4.92 7/30/2012 265596 PKM- GARDEN HOSE & NOZZLE 27.57 7/30/2012 265600 PWST - GORILLA TAPE 33.46 7/17/2012 265265 PKM -MISC HARDWARE 12.84 7/16/2012 265208 PKM -PRO GONG BRUSH, SPONGE 12.78 7/13/2012 265149 PKM -TOOLS & RIP BAR 39.78 7/24/2012 265440 PKM -SAT P TRAP & PVC P TRAP 25.69 7/24/2012 265444 PKM- RETURN SAT P TRAP -21.68 231167 8/16/2012 007572 NORTH PACIFIC INST. FOR, 150.00 7/1612012 36276 DBC- REFUND RENTAL DEPOSIT 7/14 150.00 231168 8/16/2012 014549 NORTHERN LIGHTS SPIRITUAL CNTR, 150.00 7/30/2012 36365 DBC- REFUND RENTAL DEPOSIT 07/1 150.00 231169 8/16/2012 005493 NORTHWEST EMBROIDERY INC, 90.26 8/3/2012 74792 PD -SHIRT EMBROIDERY M DAHL 90.26 231170 8/16/2012 012847 NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE SVC OF WA, 3,716.38 7/1/2012 RC000054275 PKM -07/12 LANDSCAPE MAINT. AG1 3,716.38 231171 8/16/2012 003736 NORTHWEST TOW NGINC, 242.27 7/23/2012 405531 PD- VEHICLE TOW CASE 12 -9010 242.27 231172 8/16/2012 011414 OFFICE DEPOT, 85.70 7/19/2012 617529592001 PD- LAMINATING POUCH 84.28 7/19/2012 617529592001 PD- LAMINATING POUCH 1.42 231173 8/16/2012 001509 OLD CASTLE PRECAST, 2,068.34 7/24/2012 010179032 SWM- REDONDO CANYON VAULT 2,068.34 231174 8/16/2012 004292 OLYMPIC SECURITY SERVICES INC, 2,662.80 7/31/2012 SI +0026359 MC -07/12 COURT SECURITY AG09 -1 2,662.80 231175 8/16/2012 004494 ONSET COMPUTER CORPORATION, 681.00 7/16/2012 91781 SWM -WQ FIELD INSTRUMENTS 681.00 Bank ofAmerica Page 23 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 231176 8/16/2012 007444 ORCA PACIFIC INC, 676.67 7/12/2012 057472 FWCC -POOL CHEMICALS SVC AG10 -1 676.67 231177 8/16/2012 009920 OSAKA GARDEN SERVICE, 26,193.18 8/1/2012 30234 PWST -07/12 ROW LANDSCAPE MAINT 25,717.95 8/112012 30235 PKM -08112 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANC 475.23 231178 8/16/2012 007248 OTTO, JEFFERY 471.76 7/24/2012 OTTO 2012 PD- CLOTHING ALLOW. J OTTO 471.76 231179 8/16/2012 005741 OUTCOMES BY LEVY, 4,543.57 7/31/2012 JULY 2012 MO -07/12 LEGISLATIVE LOBBY AGI 4,543.57 231180 8/16/2012 004644 PACIFIC PLANTS INC, 18.07 7/17/2012 67952 PWST- ZEBRINUS FOR ZEBRA GRASS 18.07 231181 8/16/2012 006482 PALMER COKING COAL COMPANY, 745.41 7/18/2012 IN027747 PKM -RED CINDERS (CRUSHED ROCK) 265.40 7/19/2012 IN027761 PKM -RED CINDERS (CRUSHED ROCK) 480.01 231182 8/16/2012 000885 PARKER PAINT MANUFACTURING CO, 62.90 7/26/2012 022015540 CD -PAINT SUPPLIES 71.16 7/26/2012 022015541 CD -PAINT SUPPLIES -8.26 231183 8/16/2012 001166 PETTY CASH - FWCC, 352.71 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS- ALBERTSON'S DAY CAMP 11.85 8113/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS- CUPCAKES FOR CULTURES & C 7.99 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS - WALMART- SUPPLIES FOR SPEC 17.02 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS- TARGET STORAGE CONTAINERS 21.90 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 FWCC- 06/28- 07/12/12 D LUSEBRIN 15.12 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 FWCC- 07/05/12 R TAYLOR 8.32 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS -FRED MEYER, FLOWERS FOR F 5.46 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS - WALKER ACE HARDWARE, LIGH 2.73 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS- ALBERTSONS, FLOWERS FOR F 10.94 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS -FRED MEYER, SODA FOR FRIE 12.05 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS -ROPE FOR SCENERY FOR FRIE 3.29 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS - WALMART, MARKER FOR PROPS 1.58 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS -JO -ANN, MATERIAL FOR COST 19.13 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS -PARTY CITY, PLATES FOR PR 10.94 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS- OFFICE MAX, PAPER CARD ST 15.32 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS -JO -ANN, INK PADS & PAINT 6.76 8113/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS -JO -ANN, RIBBON FOR FLOWER 5.89 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS -JO -ANN, RIBBON FOR FLOWER 1.06 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS -FRED MEYER, BREAKFAST ITE 61.34 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS -SOL DUC ADMISSIONS - SENI 22.50 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS -BARON BARCLAY, BRIDGE SUP 54.17 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS- HEAVEN SENT, PRESCHOOL IT 27.35 8/13/2012 FWCC- 08/13/12 PRCS - PARKING FOR LEMAY MUSEUM, 10.00 231184 8/16/2012 006241 PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT, 461.05 8/9/2012 PD- 08/09/12 PD- APPEAR AT COURT DETA. SCHO 16.00 8/9/2012 PD- 08/09/12 PD- BATTERY FOR KEY FOB FOR- 5.46 8/9/2012 PD- 08/09/12 PD -BOOT ALLOW RADAMS 98.55 8/9/2012 PD- 08/09/12 PD- SHOOTING STICK FOR SNIPER- 43.79 8/9/2012 PD- 08/09/12 PD -FOOD FOR DETECTIVES WORKING 16.51 8/9/2012 PD- 08109/12 PD- WINDSHIELD SHADE FOR SIU 15.32 8/912012 PD- 08/09/12 PD- COFFEE FOR VOLUNTEER RECOG 55.72 8/9/2012 PD- 08/09/12 PD- COFFEE FOR VOLUNTEER RECOGN 52.45 8/9/2012 PD- 08/09/12 PD -CELL PHONE HOLSTER CASE- 39.09 8/9/2012 PD- 08/09/12 PD- ANIMAL FOOD BAIT FOR ANIMAL 6.52 8/9/2012 PD- 08/09/12 PD -AA BATTERIES FOR SWAT- 15.32 8/9/2012 PD- 08/09/12 PD- VEHICLE MAINTENANCE- 86.82 8/9/2012 PD- 08/09/12 PD -FOOD FOR WITNESS IN- 9.50 231185 8/16/2012 012904 PINTO, MICHELLE A 137.50 8/7/2012 08/07/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 137.50 231186 8/16/2012 009791 PIRTEK KENT, 225.39 7/17/2012 S1646950.001 PWFLT -REFIT RR GUARDS, PANELS, 225.39 231187 8/16/2012 012915 PITNEY BOWES PRESORT SVC INC, 2,699.95 8/4/2012 3331893 FI -07/12 POSTAGE & MAIL CARRIE 1,700.97 8/412012 3331893 FI -07/12 POSTAGE & MAIL CARRIE 404.99 8/4/2012 3331893 FI -07/12 POSTAGE & MAIL CARRIE 593.99 Bank of America Page 24 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 231188 8/16/2012 000808 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY, 230.71 7/13/2012 1999092 CHB- ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 8267 7/12/2012 1939003 CHB- ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 148.04 231189 8/16/2012 005583 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC, 51.03 7/6/2012 43439061 PKM- WELDING SUPPLIES 28.86 7/20/2012 43517427 PKM - WELDING SUPPLIES 2217 231190 8/16/2012 010845 PRIORITY PRINT MANAGEMENT INC, 1,084.67 7/31/2012 00031434 SWM -07/12 WATER LOG NEWSLETTER 489.21 7/31/2012 31435 -1 SWM =THE LAKE VIEW NEWSLETTER 137.18 7/31/2012 31435 -2 SWM =THE LAKE VIEW NEWSLETTER 91.45 7/12/2012 00031346 PRCS -RWB MAP CARDS 366.83 231191 8/16/2012 014244 PROCERT LLC, 588.00 7/26/2012 JULY 26, 2012 PRCS -2012 BABYSITTING CLASSES 588.00 231192 8/16/2012 009960 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT, 1,704.74 7/30/2012 145174 PD -TASER WARRANTIES 623.99 8/2/2012 145442 PD -TASER HOLSTERS 144.32 8/2/2012 145456 PD -TASER HOLSTERS 108.25 7/17/2012 144114 PD -TASER WARRANTIES 828.18 231193 8/16/2012 014550 PROTECTION & COMMUNICATION INC, 113.60 7/30/2012 12- 103469 REFUND CD- 12- 103469 PERMIT CANCELLED 113.60 231194 8/16/2012 012541 PRO- TOWAUBURN, 288.33 7/25/2012 113629 PD- TOWING SVC CASE 12 -9131 288.33 231195 8/16/2012 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC, 28,722.73 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 CRNR S 316TH ST & 2 73.66 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 HOYT RD & 340TH- 85.07 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 PAC HWY S & S 330TH 118.74 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 288TH ST & PAC HW 438.10 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S288TH & 18TH AVE S 104.05 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 296TH PL & MILITA 21.85 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 320TH & 23 AV S- 248.55 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 322ND & 23 AVE S- 135.11 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 336TH ST & PAC HW 570.60 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 348TH ST. & 1STA 232.56 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 282ND & MILITARY 147.14 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 316TH & PAC HWY S 46.15 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 SW CRNR S 312TH & P 212.85 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 SW 308TH & 2ND AVE 10.44 7127/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 SW 329TH WAY & HOYT 10.54 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 VARIOUS LOCATIONS- 29.30 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 1TH WAY S & 334TH S 18.68 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 1ST WAY S & 336TH S 81.41 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 1STAVE S & S 330TH 59.07 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 1000 SW CAMPUS DR- 151.26 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07112 115TH ST S & 316ST 10.54 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07112 1300 S 344TH ST- 23.04 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 1403 SW 312TH ST PE 10.44 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 1405 S 312TH ST.- 122.39 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 1790 SW 345TH PLACE 143.43 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 1414 S 324TH ST- 32.29 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 18TH AVE & S 312 ST 66.00 7127/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 199 SW 311TH PLACE- 136.57 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 21ST AVE SW & SW 33 117.71 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 21 ST AVE SW & SW 34 260.62 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07112 21ST AVE S GRID ROA 77.17 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 21STAVE SW & SW 32 98.78 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 21 STAVE SW & 356TH 84.78 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 2140 SW 356TH ST- 26.33 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 23RD AVE S & S 317T 177.78 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 23R DAVE S & 320TH 176.23 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 2510 S 336TH ST- 31.28 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 2510 SW 336TH STREE 10.44 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 2613 S 275TH PLACE 28.46 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 28516 24TH AVE S- 20.47 Bank of America Page 25 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 29600 PAC HWY S SIG 386.30 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 29829 23RD AVE S- 25.33 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 2999 SW 314TH ST- 63.04 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 31020 14TH AVE S- 30.78 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 3113 27TH AVE SW- 80.73 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 31200 STATE RT 99 S 284.22 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 31455 28TH AVE S- 90.76 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 31600 STATE RT 99 S 98.58 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 31847 PAC HWY S- 225.18 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 31910 GATEWAY CNTR 46.67 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 32000 PAC HWY S- 226.52 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 32400 STATE RT 99 N 99.68 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 32400 STATE RT 99 S 272.50 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 32400 STATE RT 99 S 104.44 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 32562 SW HOYT RD FL 10.44 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 32731 HOYT RD FLASH 10.54 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 32932 7TH CT SW- 19.36 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 33099 HOYT RD SW- 221.06 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 3318 SW 346TH PLACE 36.47 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 33220 ST WAY S - 51.73 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 33325 8TH AVE- 86.65 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 33401 38TH AVE S- 154.14 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 33405 6TH AVE S- 37.12 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 33507 9TH AVE- 74.15 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 33645 20TH PLACE- 220.92 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 33800 WEYHR WAY S- 198.94 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR- 07/12 34010 20TH AVE- 103.41 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 34018 PAC HWY S- 59.10 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 3420 SW 343RD ST- 27.91 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 34800 21 STAVE SW- 88.09 7/2712012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 34836 WEYHR WAY S- 48.85 7127/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 34801 16TH AVE S- 35.36 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 35007 ENCHANTED PKW 122.80 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 35106 21 STAVE SW- 43.50 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 35202 ENCHANT PKWY- 205.99 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 35505 PAC HWY S- 232.10 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWfR -07/12 35654 9TH AVE SW- 17.87 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 35896 PAC HWY S- 125.96 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 35909 1STAVE SW FL 10.54 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 36111 16TH AVE S- 71.01 7/2712012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 36201 MILTON RD- 131.54 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 36600 PAC HWY S- 10.54 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 491 S 338TH ST- 65.03 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 515 S 312TH STREET 20.27 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 727 S 312TH ST- 173.15 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 8TH AVE S & DASH PT 55.69 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 824 SW 361TH ST- 155.96 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 322N ST & 23 AVE 82.18 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWfR -07/12 HWY 509 & 21 STAVE 31.78 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 NE CRNR S 312TH & 2 162.94 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 304TH & MILITARY 66.03 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 312TH & 23 AVE S- 158.44 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 314TH & 20TH AVE 149.42 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 320 SET & 32RD AV 229.31 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 320TH & PAC HWY S 557.97 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 320TH & WEYHR WAY 205.56 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 336TH ST & WEYHR 128.12 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 348TH ST & PAC HW 160.32 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 316TH & 20TH AVE 67.01 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 SR 161 & 356TH NE C 204.00 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 STAR LK RD & MILITA 35.94 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 SW CAMPUS DR & 6TH 48.16 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 SW 308TH ST & 4 AVE 10.44 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 SW 312TH ST & DASH 84.57 Bank ofAmerica Page 26 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 SW 324TH & 11TH PL 164.60 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 SW 340TH & HOYT RD 152.53 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 SW 340TH ST & 35TH 64.02 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 21 STAVE SW & DASH 69.97 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 333ST & 1ST WAY- 66.23 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 S 348TH HOV LANE- 183.87 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 30390 PAC HWY S- 334.07 7/27/2012 PWTR 2012 07 PWTR -07/12 1453 S 308TH STREET 243.61 8/8/2012 131 - 066 -1002 PWTR -07/12 NON - METERED ELECT 15,650.84 231196 8/16/2012 010187 RASOR, EVA EDLA 348.00 8/6/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC -07/12 EXERCISE TRAINING S 348.00 231197 8/16/2012 014433 RIVERSIDE FORD, 178.44 7/23/2012 62760 PWFLT -PATS KEY 46.54 7/23/2012 62761 PWFLT -WIPER BLADE 33.15 7/23/2012 62762 PWFLT- FILTER 32.80 7/2412012 62761 -1 PWFLT -WIPER BLADE 33.15 7/24/2012 62762 -1 PWFLT- FILTER 32.80 231198 8/16/2012 005508 SAFAROVA- DOWNEY, ALMIRA 100.00 7/3112012 07/31/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 231199 8/16/2012 003726 SAFEWAY STORE #1555, 108.27 8/112012 2210837 PRCS -SMNR CAMP FOR TALENT SUPP 25.65 8/2/2012 2210840 PRCS -GOLD BAR TRIP SUPPLIES 27.20 7/17/2012 2210819 PRCS -DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 55.42 231200 8/16/2012 003772 SALLOUM, MARWAN 100.00 7/30/2012 SALLOUM 2012 PW- MEDICAL DEDUCTIBLE SALLOUM 100.00 231201 8/16/2012 003174 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIPMENT CO, 5,744.37 6/19/2012 602599 PD- POLICE AMMUNITION SUPPLY- 5,744.37 231202 8/16/2012 009771 SAXTON, YAMEEKIA 220.00 8/6/2012 1143750 PRCS- REFUND SMNR CAMP 2012 220.00 231203 8/16/2012 701186 SEATTLE CENTRAL COMM COLLEGE, 66.81 7/23/2012 36319 DBC- REFUND DEPOSIT LESS BALANC 66.81 231204 8/16/2012 001126 SENIOR SERVICES, 4,994.00 8/8/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 VOLUNTEER TRANSPO 2,500.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 MEALS ON WHEELS A 2,494.00 231205 8/16/2012 005771 SETINA MANUFACTURING COMPANY, 1,912.03 8/3/2012 51633 PD- BUMPER & FENDER WRAPS 511.97 8/3/2012 51635 PD- PRISONER PARTITION 773.13 9/2/2012 51634 PD- PARTITION & PANEL 626.93 231206 8/16/2012 010962 SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEMS, 10.85 7/25/2012 C753040 -701 IT- COPIER RPR, MNT, SUP 10.85 231207 8/16/2012 001480 SHERWIN- WILLIAMS CO, 229.90 7/19/2012 7297 -6 PKM -PAINT 229.90 231208 8/16/2012 002501 SHOPE CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO INC, 1,137.08 7/10/2012 9934347 PKM -CATCH BASIN, GRATE, COVER 757.24 7/10/2012 9934357 PKM- RISERS 379.84 231209 8/16/2012 001014 SKCSRA- SOCCER REFEREESASSOC, 3,240.00 8/7/2012 10288 PRCS- SOCCER REFEREE SVC AG10 -0 690.00 8/7/2012 10289 PRCS- SOCCER REFEREE SVC AG10 -0 1,330.00 817/2012 10290 PRCS- SOCCER REFEREE SVC AG10 -0 1,220.00 231210 8/16/2012 008283 SMITH, SHON 100.00 7/24/2012 SMITH 2012 PD- BOOTALLOW S SMITH 100.00 231211 8/16/2012 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 255.23 7/13/2012 650539 CDHS -CDBG FUNDS LEGALAD 79.31 7/6/2012 644275 MO- LOBBYIST RFP LEGAL AD 175.92 231212 8/16/2012 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 154.29 7/20/2012 653265 CD- VERIZON WIRELESS DNS LEGAL 154.29 231213 8/16/2012 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC, 40.38 7/20/2012 652945 HRCK - ORGINANCE 12 -725 LEGALAD 40.38 231214 8/16/2012 004910 SPACESAVER NORTHWEST, 341.46 7/27/2012 13406 -1 CD -FILE LABELS 341.46 231215 8/16/2012 001885 SPARKS CAR CARE, 5,330.68 7/27/2012 30673 PD -OLF, TEST BATTERY 100.68 Bank ofAmerica Page 27 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 7/27/2012 30675 PD- WHEELL, MOUNT TIRES, SENSOR 54.75 7/27/2012 30675 PD- WHEELL, MOUNT TIRES, SENSOR 474.49 7/27/2012 30683 PD -OLF 34.98 7/27/2012 30684 PD -FRONT END ALIGNMENT 54.75 7/27/2012 30686 PD -OLF, WIPERS, PAN GASKET 173.95 7/27/2012 30688 PD -OLF 35.92 7/26/2012 30640 PD -OLF, WHEEL, MOUNT TIRES 21.68 7/26/2012 30640 PD -OLF, WHEEL, MOUNT TIRES 162.06 7/26/2012 30656 PD -NEW WHEEL, SENSOR, MOUNT TI 239.43 7/26/2012 30672 PD -OLF 35.92 8/7/2012 30745 PD- REPAIR FLAT TIRE 43.80 8/7/2012 30751 PD- REPAIR WINDOW POWER SWITCH 192.67 8/7/2012 30756 PD- INSPECT BRAKES 32.85 7/20/2012 30631 PD -OLF 37.98 7/20/2012 30632 PD -OLF 34.98 7/20/2012 30634 PD- BATTERY 249.77 7/23/2012 30642 PD -OLF 38.43 8/2/2012 30730 PD- INSPECK BRAKE SYSTEM 98.55 8/2/2012 30731 PD -RESET TPMS SYSTEM 32.85 7/30/2012 30697 PD -OLF 34.99 7/30/2012 30699 PD -MOUNT NEW TIRE 14.24 7/30/2012 30701 PD -OLF 37.98 7/30/2012 30702 PD -OLF, MOUNT NEW TIRES 89.74 7/30/2012 30702 PD -OLF, MOUNT NEW TIRES 28.46 8/1/2012 30725 PD- REPAIR BRAKES, PADS & ROTOR 658.73 7/24/2012 30630 PD -OLF, REPAIR TRANSMISSION, F 2,316.05 231216 8/16/2012 001618 SPEEDY GLASS -TACOMA, 8/6/2012 9172 - 1005595 PD- WINDSHIELD REPAIR 32.85 231217 8/16/2012 002548 SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL, 7/26/2012 1876435 DBC -PEST CONTROL SVC 93.08 231218 8/16/2012 004701 SPRINT, 7/28/2012 400102318 -128 IT -07/12 CELLULAR AIRTIME 1,832.74 7/28/2012 400102318 -128 IT -07/12 CELLULAR AIRTIME 1,985.47 231219 8/16/2012 010072 ST. VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY, 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 EMERGENCY HUMAN S 1,849.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 EMERGENCY HUMAN S 4,438.00 231220 8/16/2012 009566 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE, 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 46.99 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 16.38 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 42.29 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 29.94 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 539.61 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 307.20 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 85.81 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 37.95 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121.11 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 203.26 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 122.55 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 102.02 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 225.94 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 82.91 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 34.03 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 28.29 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 37.72 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 9.43 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 42.91 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 56.42 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 109.26 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 237.57 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 57.15 7/31/2012 8022622971 JULY 2012 OFFICE SUPPLIES 30.55 7/31/2012 8022622972 HR -07/12 PAPER SUPPLY 38.54 7/31/2012 8022622972 HR -07/12 PAPER SUPPLY 154.18 7/31/2012 8022622972 HR -07/12 PAPER SUPPLY 501.07 32.85 93.08 3,818.21 6,287.00 3,301.08 Bank ofAmerica Page 28 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 231221 8/16/2012 011134 STENDER ZUMWALT, PLLC, 30,300.00 7/3012012 436 MO -08/12 PUBLIC DEFENDER AG11- 30,300.00 231222 8/16/2012 003307 STERICYCLE INC, 137.77 7/31/2012 3001942680 PD- MEDICAL WASTE REMOVAL SERVI 137.77 231223 8/16/2012 003896 SUMMIT LAW GROUP, 4,155.00 7/20/2012 57938 LAW -GUILD NEGOTIATION LEGAL SV 3,750.00 6/30/2012 57954 LAW -LEGAL SVCS AG11 -190- 405.00 231224 8/16/2012 009238 SUMNER LAWN N SAW, 202.32 7/17/2012 203280 PKM -MOWER STARTER KIT 202.32 231225 8/16/2012 007710 SUPERIOR LINEN SERVICE, 62.15 7/16/2012 52459 DBC -LINEN SERVICE 19.30 7/23/2012 53950 DBC -LINEN SERVICE 23.99 7/30/2012 55431 DBC -LINEN SERVICE 18.86 231226 8/1612012 002521 SUPERLON PLASTICS INC, 3,294.97 7/20/2012 12F2016 PKM -PVC SEWER PIPE & GLUE 558.55 7/10/2012 12F1895 PKM -PVC SEWER PIPE & CEMENT 1,119.50 7/11/2012 12F1922 PKM -PVC SEWER PIPE 301.07 7/25/2012 12F2048 PKM -PVC PIPE 1,315.85 231227 8/16/2012 013891 SYNERGY BUILDING SERVICES, 4,320.00 8/1/2012 162 PKM -07/12 JANITORIALAG07 -194- 4,158.00 8/1/2012 162 PKM -07/12 JANITORIALAG07 -194- 162.00 231228 8/16/2012 009523 SYSTEMS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY, 12,913.15 8/2/2012 19591 PD -NEW VEHICLE SET UP INSTALL 3,379.31 8/2/2012 19665 PD -NEW VEHICLE SET UP INSTALL 2,676.49 7/31/2012 19565 PD- REPAIR PIT WRAPS 137.84 7/31/2012 19592 PD -NEW VEHICLE SET UP INSTALL 2,817.05 7/31/2012 19593 PD -NEW VEHICLE SETUP INSTALL 2,817.05 7/31/2012 19625 PD -TEST SIREN SWAP FLASHLIGHT 413.53 7/2412012 19123 PD -NEW VEHICLE SETUP INSTALL L 556.52 7/24/2012 19537 PD- REPAIR SEAT BELT 115.36 231229 8/16/2012 000588 TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES, 1,322.18 7/24/2012 100048250 DBC -07/12 DASH PT RD- 885.86 7/24/2012 100048250 DBC -07/12 DASH PT. RD- 436.32 231230 8/16/2012 010525 TEST AMERICA LABORATORIES, 190.00 7/17/2012 58071540 SWM -WQ N. LAKE SAMPLE TESTING 190.00 231231 8/16/2012 003071 TETRA TECH, INC, 45,906.88 7/31/2012 50583479 PWST -SAFE SCHL ROUTES AG11 -13 31,370.11 7/25/2012 50582443 PWST -SW 312TH ENGINEERING CONS 14,536.77 231232 8/16/2012 009280 THUNDERING OAK ENTERPRISES INC, 773.07 7/25/2012 5897 PKM -TREE SERVICE AG11 -003 773.07 231233 8/16/2012 006399 TIGER MOUNTAIN WOODCRAFTS, 492.75 7/27/2012 JULY 27, 2012 PD- CAMGRIP BATONS 492.75 231234 8/16/2012 008673 T- MOBILE USA INC, 442.88 7/21/2012 830401935 IT -07/12 CELLULAR SVC 442.88 231235 8/16/2012 008902 TRI -CITY MEATS, 464.10 7/20/2012 261151 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 57.30 7/10/2012 260781 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 406.80 231236 8/16/2012 002426 UNITED GROCERS CASH & CARRY, 368.12 7/21/2012 196735 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 217.20 7/23/2012 197301 FWCC -DISH SOAP 64.67 7/27/2012 198454 PRCS -KID'S DAY SUPPLIES 30.72 7/27/2012 198577 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 55.53 231237 8/16/2012 003837 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, 94.73 7/21/2012 OOOOF6588V292 PD -UPS DELIVERY SVC 77.95 7121/2012 OOOOF80F48292 PD -UPS DELIVERY SVC 1.73 7/28/2012 OOOOF80F48302 IT -UPS DELIVERY SVC 15.05 231238 8/16/2012 005019 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), 196.67 7/17/2012 104104263 -002 SWM- CREDIT CHISEL -77.66 7/17/2012 104136134 -001 SWM- ASPHALT CUTTER 196.67 7/16/2012 104104263 -001 SWM- CHISEL 77.66 231239 8/16/2012 011540 US POSTMASTER, 4,450.00 8/6/2012 63958P SWR- RECYCLE EVENT BROCHURE POS 4,450.00 Bank ofAmerica Page 29 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 231240 8/16/2012 005715 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS, 11.79 8/2/2012 V6163838H IT -08/12 PAGER LEASE 6.13 8/2/2012 V6163838H IT -08/12 PAGER LEASE 5.66 231241 8/16/2012 004552 VALLEY CITIES COUNSELING, 12,625.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 B CDHS -Q2 2012 YOUTH DEVELOPMENT 1,375.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 C CDHS -02 2012 GIRL'S CIRCLE EMP 1,250.00 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -02 2012 MENTAL HEALTH COU 10,000.00 231242 8/16/2012 001124 VERIZON WIRELESS, 14,869.76 5/13/2012 1083780488 IT -04/12 CELLULAR SVC 4,784.08 6/13/2012 1092655818 IT -05/12 CELLULAR SVC 7,632.65 7/13/2012 1101530364 IT -06/12 CELLULAR SVC 3,704.45 5/13/2012 1083780488 IT -04/12 CELLULAR SVC - 1,319.04 7/12/2012 1101076569 PD -07/12 BAIT CARE WIRELESS WA 67.62 231243 8/16/2012 014556 VILLAR, SONIA 500.00 8/6/2012 1143598 PRCS- REFUND RENTAL DEPOSIT 07/ 500.00 231244 8/16/2012 000294 VILMASIGNS, 328.50 7/30/2012 23,012 PRCS -KID'S DAY BANNER 328.50 231245 8/16/2012 006278 VISUAL EFFECTS, 246.15 7/26/2012 18369 PD- WINDOW TINTING 246.15 231246 8/16/2012 007607 WA CITIES INSURANCE AUTHORITY, 16,089.25 8/1/2012 AUGUST 1, 2012 RM- PERALTA -REYES REIMB DED; 7/ 39.00 8/1/2012 AUGUST 1, 2012 RM- SAMPLE REIMB DED; 7/10/2012 2,028.05 8/1/2012 AUGUST 1, 2012 RM- LOANITAADAMS REIMB DED; 7/ 2,226.92 8/1/2012 AUGUST 1, 2012 RM- SIMMONS REIMB DED; 7/12/201 4,436.50 8/112012 AUGUST 1, 2012 RM- SALAZAR REIMB DED; 7/16/201 1,861.55 8/112012 AUGUST 1, 2012 RM- SAMPLE REIMB DED; 7/17/2012 288.07 8/112012 AUGUST 1, 2012 RM- SAMPLE REIMB DED; 7/26/2012 285.40 8/1/2012 AUGUST 1, 2012 RM- SIMMONS REIMB DED; 7/27/201 3,628.75 8/1/2012 AUGUST 1, 2012 RM- SABOTKA REIM DED; 7/16/2012 714.33 8/1/2012 AUGUST 1, 2012 RM- KURDELCHUK ESTATE REIMB DED 580.68 231247 8/16/2012 005125 WA STATE DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, 1,074.20 7/16/2012 WINV313658 PD- BLOCKWATCH POST CARDS 1,074.20 231248 8/16/2012 000567 WA STATE DEPT OF ECOLOGY, 22,864.50 7/18/2012 2013- WAR045516 SWM -2012 WA ECOLOGY PERMIT 22,864.50 231249 8/16/2012 004258 WA STATE DEPT OF LICENSING, 1,599.00 7/31/2012 AUGUST 15, 2012 PD -REMIT CPL FEES 1,599.00 231250 8/16/2012 000253 WA STATE DEPT OF TRANSPORTATN, 2,440.54 7/17/2012 RE- 313- ATB20717061 PWWSDOT 2012 MAINT /STATE ROUT 1,624.00 7/17/2012 RE- 313- ATB20717061 PWWSDOT 2012 MAINT /STATE ROUT 696.01 7/17/2012 RE- 313- ATB20717084 PWST - PROJECT MGMT SVC 120.53 231251 8/16/2012 003825 WA STATE DEPT OF TRANSPORTATN, 819.68 7/17/2012 RE 41 JA7774 L001 PWST -SR 509 ENGINEERING REVIEW 819.68 231252 8/16/2012 008024 WA STATE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, 13.50 7/31/2012 12- 073195- RDU -M5 PD -WORK HISTORY CASE 12 -8456 13.50 231253 8/16/2012 001379 WA STATE L &I ELEVATOR SECTION, 114.10 911/2012 138443 CHB- 09/12 -09/13 ELEVATOR FERMI 114.10 231254 8/16/2012 000514 WASTATE -STATE REVENUES, 95,978.72 8/3/2012 JULY 2012 FI -07/12 STATE PORTION REMIT F 43,807.96 8/3/2012 JULY 2012 FI -07/12 PSEA COURT FEES #2 23,008.19 8/3/2012 JULY 2012 FI -07/12 PSEA COURT FEES #3 395.42 8/312012 JULY2012 FI- 07/12 ACCESSCOMMACCT 168.85 8/3/2012 JULY 2012 FI -07/12 MULTITRANSACCT 168.91 8/3/2012 JULY 2012 FI -07/12 PSEA JIS FEES 15,337.22 8/3/2012 JULY 2012 FI -07/12 TRAUMA VICTIMS FEES 3,504.95 8/3/2012 JULY 2012 FI -07/12 SCHOOL ZONE SAFETY 690.38 8/3/2012 JULY 2012 FI -07/12 AUTO THEFT PREY. 6,716.66 8/3/2012 JULY 2012 FI -07/12 BRAIN TRAUMA INJ 1,221.12 8/3/2012 JULY 2012 FI -07/12 SBCC SURCHARGE FEES 229.50 8/3/2012 JULY 2012 FI -07/12 HIWAY SAFETY 140.17 8/312012 JULY 2012 FI -07/12 DEATH INVESTIGATIONS 88.32 8/3/2012 JULY 2012 FI -07/12 WSP HIWAY 501.07 231255 8/16/2012 006853 WAHI, PRAN 100.00 8/7/2012 08107/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 Bank of America Page 30 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 231256 8/16/2012 006007 WALKER ACE HARDWARE, 7/18/2012 006323 DBC -CLEAN DRAINS 45.96 7/24/2012 006332 CHB- GLOVES 15.31 231257 8/16/2012 011181 WALTERS, MOIRA C. 7/26/2012 517 PD -ASL INTERPRETER SVC 240.00 231258 8/16/2012 005350 WASHINGTON ROCK QUARRIES INC, 7/18/2012 27398 PKM- SAND /GRAVEUROCK QUARRY 199.38 231259 8/16/2012 000783 WASTE MANAGEMENT, 8/7/2012 1314182- 1055 -8 SWR -07/12 LITTER DISPOSAL SVCS 493.82 231260 8/16/2012 012658 WATCH SYSTEMS LLC, 7/25/2012 17087 PD -RSO COMMUNITY NOTIFICATION 159.75 231261 8/16/2012 009995 WATER MANAGEMENT, 7/20/2012 112734 SWM -ALGAE COUNT SAMPLE TEST 90.00 7/16/2012 112576 SWM -FECAL COLIFORM SAMPLE TEST 65.00 231262 8/16/2012 001241 WEST COAST AWARDS, 7/24/2012 50689 PRCS -STAFF & PROGRAM CLOTHING 84.27 231263 8/16/2012 001798 WESTERN PETERBILT INC, 7/9/2012 TA15116 PWFLT -REPLC SERPENTINE BELT 348.49 231264 8/16/2012 009508 WHITWORTH PEST SOLUTIONS INC, 7/18/2012 183524 PWST - NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL 2,463.75 231265 8/16/2012 002204 WILBUR -ELLIS COMPANY, 7/18/2012 6519534 RI PKM- INSECTICIDE 41.38 7/13/2012 6504776 RI SWM- SPRAYER 121.23 231266 8/16/2012 005679 WRIGHT EXPRESS LLC, 7/31/2012 30136333 PD -07/12 CHIEF'S VEHICLE FUEL 63.88 231267 8/16/2012 001206 WSSUA -WA STATE SOFTBALL UMPIRE, 8/1/2012 725 PRCS- SOFTBALL UMPIRES SVCS AG1 5,397.00 231268 8/16/2012 001121 WWEE - WAWOMEN EMPLOY /EDUCATION, 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 REACH PLUS PROG. 2,500.00 231269 8/16/2012 012305 XTREME SIGNS & GRAPHICS, 7/13/2012 12 -878 PKM - WETLANDS SIGNS 350.08 231270 8/16/2012 008036 YWCA SEATTLE- KING COUNTY, 8/7/2012 2ND QTR 2012 CDHS -Q2 2012 CHILDREN'S DV PRO 1,625.00 231271 8/16/2012 010277 ZHELEZNYAK, MICHAEL 7/27/2012 07/27/12 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 7123793 8/1/2012 009467 US BANK, 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- NACATRNG J GALLAGHER 525.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD -TCP GLOBAL - LOCK -OUT TOOL 90.72 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- RETURN ALUMINUM PIPE - SOS 491.51 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- STREET CRIME TRNG G BASSETT 399.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD -AMBER ISMAC TRNG KC KRUSEY 767.39 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- BICYCLE REPAIR 24.63 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD -MOTOR OFFICER GLASSES 175.20 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- DUPLICATE KEYS 48.45 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- SHARPS CONTAINERS 399.98 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- WIPERS 32.83 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- SAFETY CONES 299.39 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- BATTERIES FOR RIFLE LIGHTS 106.16 7/2512012 JULY 2012 PD -SAFE CITY TRNG 94.64 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD -K9 COLLAR BATTERIES 28.80 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- BICYCLE REPAIRS 242.65 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD -JOB SEARCH POSTING 124.22 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- ALUMINUM PIPE - SOS GRANT 678.06 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD -AL PIPE - SOS GRANT 153.12 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- RETURN RIDGE MOUNTS - SOS G -37.49 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- ANTENNA SYSTEM INSTALLATION 275.23 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- ANTENNA SYSTEM INSTALLATION 22.52 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD -CORE DRILLING - ANTENNA SYSTE 279.23 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- RETIREMENT PARTY SUPPLIES 70.52 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- RETIREMENT PARTY SUPPLIES 51.76 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD -CELL PHONE INVEST. TRNG J O 350.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- REFRIDGERATOR 109.49 240.00 199.38 493.82 159.75 155.00 84.27 348.49 2,463.75 162.61 63.88 5,397.00 2,500.00 350.08 1,625.00 100.00 6,637.59 Bank of America Page 31 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- FIREARM INSTRUCTOR TRNGA H 475.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- POWERPOINT TRNG J OTTO 350.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- POWERPOINT TRNG TIROUX, KLI 350.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- POWERPOINT TRNG TIROUX, KLI 350.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PD- NACATRNG J GALLAGHER 292.60 7124759 8/1/2012 009507 US BANK, JULY 2012 SWM -HONDA GENERATOR- 10,427.61 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS - WOODLAND PARK ZOO - DAY C 1,740.80 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 FI -CAFR AWARD SUBMISSION 505.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC- STINGRAY SWIN TEAM AWARDS 511.10 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS - BRUNCH &A MOVIE 24.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS- DINNER &A MOVIE 44.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC- BEARING & BOLT PULLER KIT 58.01 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC- SEAFAIR RUN REGISTERATION 166.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC -TUNE MICROPHONE BELTS 95.33 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS- SPECIAL OLYMPICS AWARDS 89.79 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC- FAMILY FUN CNTR FIT CAMP 131.40 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC -GROUP POWER LICENSE 740.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS TWIN HARBORS CAMP TRIP 209.37 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -RWB DECORATION SUPPLIES 217.34 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -RWB GENERAL STORE SUPPLIE 40.93 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS - BRUNCH &A MOVIE 20.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -REC INC. DINNER 38.22 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC - BIRTHDAY PARTY SUPPLIES 49.94 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC /PRCS -FIT CAMP MOVIE TRIP 30.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC /PRCS -FIT CAMP MOVIE TRIP 30.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -RWB ARTS COMM. SUPPLIES 93.23 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -TWIM HARBORS CAMP TRIP 5.49 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -TWIM HARBORS CAMP TRIP 77.80 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 IT -ESRI CONF E EARLE 149.83 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS- HURRICANE RIDGE TRIP FERR 8.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS - TUESDAYS WITH DALTON SUPP 32.43 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS- WINTHROP SENIOR TRIP 346.25 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS- WINTHROP SENIOR TRIP 39.12 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS- WINTHROP SENIOR TRIP 325.86 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS- WINTHROP SENIOR TRIP 55.52 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS - TUESDAYS WITH DALTON BRID 5.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -LETS GO SAILING SENIOR TR 34.71 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -LETS GO SAILING SENIOR TR 125.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS- LAVENDER FESTIVAL SENIOR 10.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC /PRCS- MARINERS GAME FIT CA 163.97 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC /PRCS- MARINERS GAME FIT CA 163.96 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -TEEN CAMP MOVIE TICKETS 64.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS- TUKWILA FUN CNTR CAMP TRI 1,740.61 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -ENJOY THE CITY BOOK 100.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 80.89 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -JAVA BILLARDS CAMP TRIP 98.00 7125/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS - TACOMA RAINIERS TICKETS 218.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS - PARKLAND PUTTERS CAMP TRI 1,169.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PRCS -ICE PACKS FOR DAY CAMP 6.75 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 SWM -WSDOL LICENSE F TANG 116.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PWDEPART. PICNIC PARK DEPOSI 230.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 SWM -LID RESEARCH CONF APPLETON 50.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 SWM- INSPECTION TRAILER SUPPLIE 15.50 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 CC- COUNCIL DINNER 111.46 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 FWCC /PRCS -LEMAY MUSEUM FIT CAM 25.00 7/2512012 JULY 2012 FWCC /PRCS -LEMAY MUSEUM FIT CAM 25.00 7129491 8/1/2012 011218 US BANK, 8,965.45 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PWST- STREET MAP LAMINATION 34.95 7/2512012 JULY 2012 PKM -WORK PANTS J GERMIN 164.23 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PKM -WORK PANTS J GERMIN 99.89 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PARKS -PANEL RENTAL LAKOTA PARK 262.12 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PKM- TAP /DIE SET 87.59 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 SWM -HONDA GENERATOR- 1,599.00 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 PARKS -2012 NRPAAGENCY DUES 487.00 Bank of America Page 32 of 32 Check No. Date Vendor Inv Date Invoice Description Amount Check Total 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 7/25/2012 JULY 2012 953444639:/8/2012 011291 JURY/WITNESS FUND, 8/8/2012 95344463962057 8/8/2012 95344463962057 Total Checks Issued 522 Total CC -SOUTH SOUND CHAMBER SUMMIT 500.00 CDHS -LEAD BASE PAINT TRNG M LE 250.00 SWM -GAS CARTRIDGES 63.48 SWM- CREASOTE TIMBERS 301.59 SWIM- DECOMISSION SEPTIC TANK 366.83 SWM- ABSORBANT 713.75 SWM- AIRFLOW METER 125.73 SWM- FLAGGER TRNG 59.00 PKM -EPDXY PRIMER 444.92 DBC- GOOGLE ADWORDS 239.89 DBC -REPLC AMP IN THEATRE 464.24 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 60.63 PD- PARKING @ ICE BLDG IN SEATT 2.00 SWR- 06/12 -08/12 RECYCLE SVC 51.54 SWR- RECYCLING CONTAINERS 240.29 SWR -06/12 ORGANICS RECYCLING 23.65 HR -GUILD NEGOTIATION TEAM LUNC 54.67 HR- SERVICE AWARD FRAMES 131.40 DBC- CATERING SUPPLIES 76.73 PWEOC- PREPAREDNESS LIBRARY MAT 356.60 PWEOC -WATER FOR SAFETY FAIR 27.40 IT- TRAVEL CHARGER 36.70 IT- TRAVEL SD FOR TRNG 454.60 IT -TIVO FOR PD 25.08 IT -APPS FOR IPAD 8.75 CD- NOTICE BOARD STAKES 19.64 CD -2012 APA DUES M HERRERA 294.00 CD -FIRE CODE BOOKS 171.46 CD -2012 APA DUES J SHULL 461.00 CD- PASSPORT MAILINGS 205.10 MC- REPLENISH JURY/WITNESS FUND 1,655.71 MC- REPLENISH JURY/WITNESS FUND 1,253.58 $2,364,667.99 2,909.29 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 4, 2012 ITEM #:� CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: JULY 2012 MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council approve the July 2012 Monthly Financial Report? COMMITTEE: Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee MEETING DATE: August 28, 2012 CATEGORY: Z Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Tho Kraus, Finance Director DEPT: Finance Attachments: ■ July 2012 Monthly Financial Report Options Considered: 1. Approve the July 2012 Monthly Financial Report as presented. 2. Deny approval of the July 2012 Monthly Financial Report and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Mayor recommends approval of Option 1. MAYOR APPROVAL: sw DIRECTOR APPROVAL: r]k/ Kaa r— 1 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward approval of the July 2012 Monthly Financial Report to the September 4, 2012 consent agenda for approval. mi Duclos, Roger eman, Bob Celski, Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the July 2012 Monthly Financial Report" (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED 1sT reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED — 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION # Federal Way July 2012 Monthly Financial Report GENERAL & STREET FUND OPERATIONS The overall operations of the combined General and Street Fund showed a negative result of $1.4M. Overall revenue total $22.1M and is $550K above 2012 year -to -date budget of $21.6M. 2011 2012 YTD BUDGET VS ACTUAL Adj Annual YTD Adj YTD YTD `' GENERAL & STREET FUND Favorablef(Unfavorable) $ % Summary of Sources & Uses Budget Actual Actual Budget Budget Actual Beginning Fund Balance $ 8,538,116 $ 8,538,117 $ 8,538,117 $ 12,743,855 $ 12,743,855 $ 12,743,855 n/a n/a OPERATING REVENUES Property Taxes 9,697,000 9,672,887 5,098,718 9,825,000 5,169,165 5,332,716 163,550 3.2% Sales Tax 10,684,000 10,858,380 6,176,445 10,586,000 6,120,043 5,998,958 (121,085) -2.0% Criminal Justice Sales Tax 1,710,000 1,795,972 1,034,756 1,719,000 990,409 1,029,573 39,164 4.0% Intergovernmental 2,425,000 2,399,140 1,503,148 2,269,000 1,421,610 1,614,569 192,959 13.6% Leasehold Tax 6,000 6,259 2,998 6,000 2,874 3,360 486 16.9% Gambling Taxes 462,000 511,005 273,043 168,000 128,597 123,643 (4,954) -3.9% Court Revenue 1,513,585 1,496,061 898,244 1,505,479 903,887 863,902 (39,983) -4.4% Building Permits/Fees - CED 1,091,815 1,100,689 610,274 1,105,147 683,788 940,297 256,509 37.5% ROW Permits & Develop. Svcs Fees - PW 323,430 362,983 168,628 316,895 187,450 199,142 11,692 6.2% Licenses 252,000 253,992 84,667 252,000 84,003 84,300 297 0.4% Franchise Fees 981,000 988,948 747,931 981,000 497,621 502,944 5,323 1.1% Passport Agency Fees 69,000 44,495 26,470 70,000 41,643 35,775 (5,868) -14.1% Park & General Recreation Fees 870,811 956,607 569,331 937,364 557,878 538,531 (19,347) 3.5% Police Services 874,690 959,570 454,946 930,000 440,926 462,149 21,223 4.8% Admin/Cash Management Fees 493,117 493,117 287,652 515,598 300,766 300,768 2 0.0% Interest Earnings 34,000 20,505 13,212 34,000 21,907 7,894 (14,013) -64.0% Misc/Other 254,060 341,932 182,868 256,120 136,975 200,627 63,653 46.5% Onaoina UtiUty tax Transfers in: Celebration Park/Park M &O 274,000 274,000 274,000 276,000 276,000 276,000 0.0% Arts Comm/RW &B Festival 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 0.0% Police Positions 1,432,000 1,432,000 1,432,000 1,541,000 1,541,000 1,541,000 0.0% Street Bond/Llghts 371,000 371,000 371,000 373,000 373,000 373,000 0.0% General Fund Operations 3,919,000 3,919,000 - 3,940,000 n/a Prop 1 Voter Package 2,933,509 2,769,553 1,618,044 2,980,187 1,588,442 1,588,442 0.0% Orrooina Traffic Safety Transfers in: Court/Police/Traffic 830,000 830,000 - 830,000 - - - n/a Total Operating Revenues 41,598,017 41,856,095 21,825,374 41,513,790 21,564,984 '' 22,114,580 $49606 2.6% OPERATING EXPENDITURES City Council 490,437 462,007 312,449 383,639 251,845 244,615 7,230 2.9% Mayor's Office 1,489,426 1,180,787 688,384 1,178,849 687,427 612,978 74,449 10.8% Human Services 730,669 690,824 272,779 866,117 319,683 304,546 15,137 4.7% Municipal Court 1,554,543 1,431,099 849,007 1,582,693 925,733 826,491 99,242 10.7% Economic Development 222,999 115,858 55,841 233,577 126,503 80,957 45,546 36.0% Human Resources 972,070 780,418 440,926 863,644 496,703 422,202 74,501 15.0% Finance 935,857 889,806 497,978 905,676 521,468 498,585 22,883 4.4% Civil /Criminal Legal Services 1,536,897 1,340,746 750,453 1,641,737 950,753 812,654 138,099 14.5% Community Development Services 2,706,311 2,284,193 1,318,749 2,506,747 1,460,670 1,274,282 186,388 12.8% Jail Services 4,166,359 4,304,215 1,882,851 2,937,000 1,384,368 1,433,101 (48,733) 3.5% Police Services 22,531,740 21,646,881 12,845,616 22,301,872 12,953,290 12,748,781 204,510 1.6% Parks & Recreation 3,855,551 3,614,643 2,000,148 4,042,923 2,303,521 2,053,464 250,057 10.9% Public Works 4,709,342 4,110,014 2,284,859 4,803,805 2,738,367 2,195,319 543,048 19.8% Total Operating Expenditures 45,902,202 42,851,492 24,200,038 ",248,279 25,120,331 23,507,974 1,612,358 6.4% Operating Revenues over /(under) Operating Expenditures (4,304,185) (896,397) (2,274,664) (2,734,489) (3,555,347) (1,393,384) 2,161,963 -60.8% OTHER FINANCING SOURCES One -Time Transfers In /Grants/Other 5,617,939 5,472,181 4,297,146 848,015 431,062 431,062 0.0% Total Other Financing Sources 5,617,939 5,472,181 4,297,146 848,015 431,062 431,062 0.0% OTHER FINANCING USES Contingency Reserve Funds - - - 1,111,698 - n/a One -Time Transfers Out/Other /Unalloc IS 945,000 370,046 1,088,216 144,395 144,395 0.00/0 Total Other Financing Uses 945,000 370,046 2,199,014 144,395 144,396 0.0% Total Ending Fund Balance $ 8,906,870 $ 12,743,855 1 $ 10,560,600 1 $ 8,657,466 1 $ 9,475,176 $ 11,637,138 n n/a DESIGNATED OPERATING FUNDS Designated operating funds revenue total $15.9M and is $1.2M above year -to -date budget of $14.7M. Expenditures of $11.5M is $234K above 2012 year -to -date budget of $11.8M. 2011,. 2012 YTOBIDGEr VS ACTUAL DESIGNATED OPERATING FUNDS Favorable /(Unfavorable) Adj Annual YTD Adj YTD YTD Summaryof Sources S Uses Budget Actual. Actual Budget Budget Actual 3 Beginning Fund Balance $12,173,613 $12,173,616 $12,173,616 $12,965,264 $12,965,272 $12,965,272 n/a n/a OPERATING REVENUES Intergovernmental 508,000 497,726 285,504 508,000 291,397 274,103 (17,293) -5.9% Utility Tax 9,915,968 10,117,556 6,352,575 9,615,484 6,072,300 6,348,396 276,097 4.5% Utility Tax - Prop 1 Voter Package 2,900,032 2,950,954 1,852,834 2,804,516 1,771,087 1,851,616 80,529 4.5% Wotel/Wtel Lodging Tax 155,000 185,289 96,096 193,440 99.899 98,059 (3,639) -3.7% Real Estate Excise Tax 1,400,000 1,560,395 1,117,771 1,400,000 977,036 682,999 (294,037) -30.1% Federal Way Community Center - Operations 1,555,422 1,628,135 1,006,231 1,558,622 967,601 1,072,829 105,228 10.9% Red Light Photo Enforcement Program 830,000 945,606 640,324 630,000 562,041 1,386,547 824,506 146.7% Property Tax - King County Expansion Levy 153,000 159,015 83,535 155,000 81,426 84,899 3,473 4.3% Dumas Bay Centre Fund 581,318 562,023 324,992 587,732 339,779 368,232 28,452 8.4% Surface Water Management Fees 3,164,969 3,416,140 1,822,331 3,164,969 1,688,345 1,947,424 259,079 15.3% Refuse Collection Fees 275,366 297,130 182,725 278,120 171,035 164,537 (6,498) -3.8% Interest Earnings 30,000 11,338 9,062 30,000 23,978 3,977 (20,001) -83.4% Miscellaneous /Other 29,036 28,060 11,328 28,036 11,319 18,933 7,615 67.3% Ongoing Utax Transfers in: Knutzen Family Theatre 113,000 113,000 113,000 113,000 113,000 113,000 - 0.0% Federal Way Community Center Ops /Resv. 696,000 696,000 172,129 706,000 185,530 185,530 - 0.0% Debt Service - Federal Way Comm Center 915,000 915,000 292,556 915,000 286,946 286,946 - 0.0% Arterial Streets Overlay 1,011,000 1,011,000 1,011,000 1,021,000 1,021,000 1,021,000 - 0.0% Total', Operating Revenues 24,233,111 26,084,367' 18,373,886 23,808,818 14,663,618 15,807,028 1,343,610 8.6% OPERATING EXPENDITURES City Overlay Program 2,394,874 2,236,228 1,557,910 1,993,204 1,388,603 1,397,138 (8,535) -0.6% Utility Tax Adn*VCash Mgmt Fees 48,000 48,000 28,000 49,000 28,583 28,583 1 0.0% Solid Waste 430,118 427,315 250,582 438,441 257,106 224,481 32,626 12.7% Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax 372,500 187,686 39,204 409,923 85,625 262,949 (177,324) - 207.1% Federal Way Community Center - Operations 2,142,839 2,130,726 1,178,360 2,142,055 1,185,450 1,213,396 (27,947) -2.4% Traffic Safety (teed Light Photo) 50,000 18,050 - 26,754 - 1,283 (1,283) n/a Debt Service (Debt Payment & Admin Fee) 1,162,726 1,072,092 309,867 1,157,669 334,601 318,530 16,071 4.8% Surface Water Management 3,459,487 3,092,891 1,889,404 3,398,502 2,054,121 1,688,856 365,265 17.8% Dumas Bay Centre Fund 758,701 720,674 426,219 829,566 417,749 382,645 35,103 8.4% Ongoing Mlity Tax Transfers out Federal Way Community Centre Ops /RBsv. 696,000 696,000 172,129 706,000 185,530 185,530 - 0.0% Debt Service - Federal Way Conm Center 915,000 915,000 292,556 915,000 286,946 286,946 - 0.0% Knutzen Family Theatre 113,000 113,000 113,000 113,000 113,000 113,000 - 0.0% Arterial Streets Overlay 1,011,000 1,011,000 1,011,000 1,021,000 1,021,000 1,021,000 - 0.0% Transportation Construction in Progress 791,000 791,000 500,000 696,000 543,000 543,000 - 0.0% General/Street Fund Operations 6,093,000 6,093,000 2,174,000 6,227,000 2,287,000 2,287,000 - 0.0% General Fund Prop 1 Voter Package 2,933,509 2,769,553 1,618,044 2,980,187 1,588,442 1,588,442 0.0% Ongoing Traffic Safety Transfers out CourttPblicerfraffic 830,000 830,000 - 830,000 - - - Ma Total'.. Operating Expenditures '. 24,201,765 23,162,215 11.,640,273 -. 23,933;302 11,776,756.. 11,542,768 233,997 2.0% Operating Revenues over /(under) Operating Expenditures 31,356 1,942,152 3,833,721 (24,383) 2,886,761 4,364,268 1,477,607 51.2% OTHER FINANCING SOURCES One -Time TransfersIn/Grants /Other 1,191,898 1,180,790 567,866 498,490 316,332 316,332 - 0.0% Total Other Financing Sources 1,x81,868 1,180,790 667,866 488,490 316,332 316,332 0.0% OTHER FINANCING USES One -Time Transfers Out/Other /Unalloc IS 2,333,950 2,331,286 1,470,000 1,683,765 1,665,670 1,665,670 0.0% Total Other Financing Uses 2,333,860 2,331,286 11,470,000" 1,683,766 1,666,670 1,656,670 - 0.0% ENDING FUND BALANCE Arterial Street 300,001 469,704 625,321 - - 397,134 n/a n/a Utility Tax (non -Prop 1) 3,059.136 3,334,049 4,998,016 3,053,527 - 5,039,194 n/a n/a Utility Tax - Prop 1 Voter Package 697,535 836,819 836,819 661,148 - 1,104,611 rva n/a Solid Waste & Recycling 126,804 153,980 91,100 150,394 - 94,480 rVa n/a FloteVMDtal Lodging Tax 2,157 213,484 272,724 - - 46,627 n/a n/a Federal Way Community Center 880,454 967,942 780,752 991,744 - 932,234 n/a n/a Traffic Safety Fund 408,520 557,077 1,474,787 530,323 - 1,942,835 n/a n/a Paths & Trails 144,362 151,807 72,243 159,807 - 86,821 n/a n/a Debt Service Fund 3,626,699 3,866,184 3,562,528 4,013,514 - 3,493,678 n/a n/a Surface Water Management 1,734,651 2,312,897 2,232,157 2,195,153 - 2,615,169 n/a Ma Dumas Bay Centre Fund 82,598 101,330 158,754 (6) - 227,416 n/a Mill Total Ending Fund Balance $11,062,913 $12,866,272 $16,106,202 $11,766,604 $ - =16,880,188 n/a Mill Sales Tax Compared to year -to -date 2011 actual, sales tax revenues are down by $177K or 2.9 %. July sales tax collection of $856K is $6K or less than 1% above 2011's July sales tax of $850K. Compared to year -to -date 2012 budget, year -to -date sales tax revenues are below by $121 K or 2 %. There is an overall increase in all areas with the exception of Services, Construction, Information, and Government. LOCAL RETAIL SALES TAX REVENUES Year -to -date thou July Month 2011 Actual 2012 Favorable/(Unfavorable) Change', from 2011 2012 Actual vs Budget Budget Actual $ % $ % Jan $ 818,614 831,802 896,190 77,576 9.5% 64,388 7.7% Feb 1,153,192 1,163,241 1,022,314 (130,878) -11.3% (140,927) -12.1% Mar 751,420 777,655 792,916 41,496 5.5% 15,260 2.0% Apr 805,675 796,086 742,615 (63,060) -7.8% (53,470) -6.7% May 949,316 920,102 877,492 (71,824) -7.6% (42,610) -4.6% Jun 847,896 799,365 811,359 (36,537) -4.3% 11,994 1.5% Jul" 850,327 831,791 856,071 5,745 0.7% 24,280 2.9% Aug 964,978 954,767 - - - - - Sep 927,080 915,256 - - picture/sound record - Oct 919,528 882,911 - Wood product manufacturing, printing /related - - - Nov* 931,161 907,718 - 102,538 - - - Dec 939,194 805,304 - - - - - YTD Total $ 6,176,445 $ 6,120,0431$ 5,998,958 $ (177,487) -2.9% $ (121,085) -2.0% AnnualTotall $ 10,858,380 $ 10,586,000 I n/a n/a n/a We n1a July and November 2011 receipts were adjusted for Department of Revenue Emw in over - remitting $78K in ,tidy. These figures were alusted for comparison purposes. Sales Tax by SIC Groin Services decrease of $32K is mainly due to refunding a hospital for taxes that was previously paid. Construction decrease of $84K is due to overall decrease in construction activity compared to year -to -date 2011. Government overall decrease of $108K is mainly due to a one -time amnesty payments of $86K received in 2011. COMPARISON OF SALES TAX COLLECTIONS BY SIC GROUP Year -to -date thru July Favorable✓(unbirombW Component : Component group are comprised of the 2011 - 2012 Change f m 2011 $ '% Group following major categories: YTD YTD General merchandise stores, motor vehicle & parks dealer, building material/garden, and misc. Retail Trade store retailers $ 3,290,287 $ 3,309,525 $ 19,238 0.6% Food services/drinking places, professional, Services scientific, tech, and repair /maintenance 1,360,754 1,328,827 (31,927) -2.3% Construction of buildings and specialty trade Construct contractors 571,866 487,782 (84,084) -14.7% Wholesale of durable goods and non durable Wholesaling goods. 242,645 248,657 6,012 2.5% Transp/Utility Utilities 2,777 3,276 499 18.0% Telecommunications, publishing and motion Information picture/sound record 300,881 295,670 (5,210) -1.7% Wood product manufacturing, printing /related Manufacturing support, and furniture related products 88,593 102,538 13,945 15.7% Economic Programs, Executive/Legislative, Justice/Public Order, Human Resources Administration, Nonclassifiable Establishments which includes Liquor Stores and sales tax for establishments that did not classify their Government Component group. 171,270 63,407 (107,863) -63.0% Rental /leasing services, real estate, and credit Fin/Ins/Real Estate intermediation. 134,731 142,768 8,038 6.0% Mining, support activities of mining, and Other I transportation services. 12,641 16,506 3,865 30.6% YTD Total $ 6,176,445 $ 5,998,958 $ (177,487) -2.9% Sales Tax by Area Comparing 2u 12 to 2u 11: SALES TAX COMPARISON by AREA Year -to -date thru July Location 2011 2012 Fa vora bl elfUnfa vora bl e) Chg from 2011 $ % YTD Total Sales Tax $ 6,176,446 $ 5,998,958 $ (177,487) -2.9% S'348th Retail Block 661,351 656,870 5,519 0.8% • chg from prev yr 1.4% 0.8% n/a Ma The Commons 593,289 668,608 (34,681)' -5.8% • chg from prev yr 1.7% -5.8% n/a n/a S 312th to S 316th 501,574 488,683 (12,891)' -2.6% • chg from prev yr -5.7% -2.6% n/a We Pavilion Center 307,566` 293,488 (14,077)' -4.6% • chg from prev yr -6.7% -4.6% n/a n/a Hotels & Motels' 91,787 86,852 (5,935) -6.5% • chg from prev yr 26.5% -6.5% n/a n1a FWCrossings ! 238,429 236,503 (I' -0.8% % chg from prev yr a2% -0.8% n/a Me • S 348th is up $6K or less than 1% mainly due to a general increase for a building material/garden store and is offset by a decrease in an electronics retail store and a major discount wholesaler. • The Commons is down $35K or 5.8% mainly due to a decrease from a major discount retail store and book retailer closing in May of 2011. • S312 to S316th is down $13K or 2.6% mainly due to a decrease from a major discount retail store and a grocery store. • Pavilion Center is down $14K or 4.6% mainly due to a decrease from a major electronics/appliances retailer and is offset by an increase for a book retailer. ■ Hotel & Motels is down $6K or 6.5 %. ■ Federal Way Crossings is down $2K or less than 1 %. Utility Tax (Total 7.75 %) Total net utility taxes received year -to -date 2012 is $8.2M and is below 2011's year -to -date collections by $5K or 0.1 %. Compared to year -to -date budget, net utilities tax revenues are above 2012 year -to -date projections by $357K or 4.5 %. Rebate line item is for Federal Way residents who are 65 years of age or older, disabled/unable to work, and qualified as low income during the calendar year would qualify for the City's Utility Tax Rebate Program. Any payments that these qualified individuals made towards the utility tax that is passed from the utility company to the consumer is reimbursed by the City. This is an annual program that opens January 1St and closes April 30th of each year. The City has processed 187 rebates totaling $27K year -to -date. UT FUTY TAXES ` Year -to -date thru July Month 2011 Actual 2012 Favorab lel(Untavorabile ) Change from 2011 2012 Actual va Budget ,Budget Actual $ War % Var $ Var %Ver Jan $ 1,121,556 $ 1,240,370 $1,257,662 $ 136,106 12.1% $ 17,291 1.4% Feb 1,358,659 1,219,793 1,268,041 (90,618) -6.7% 48,248 4.0% Mar 1,286,564 1,244,260 1,190,372 (96,193) -7.5% (53,888) -4.3% Apr 1,295,155 1,167,250 1,519,049 223,893 17.3% 351,799 30.1% May 1,186,432 1,096,344 1,048,429 (138,003) -11.6% (47,915) -4.4% Jun 1,033,820 987,492 793,896 (239,924) -23.2% (193,596) -19.6% Jul 949,722 914,878 1,149,646 1 199,924 21.1% 234,768 25.7% Aug 908,464 872,598 - - - - - Sept 911,253 850,446 - - - - Oct 989,797 945,201 - - - - Nov 506,796 608,369 - - - - - Dec 1,546,791 1,299,999 - - - - - SubtotalYTD $ 8,231,909 $ 7,870,387 $8,227,096 $ (4,816) -0.1% $ 366,708 4.5% Rebate (26,500) (27,000) (27,081) (581) 2.2% (81) 0.3% YTD Total $ 8,205,410 $ 7,843,387 $8,200,014 $ (5,396) -0.19/6 $ 356,627 4.6% Net Annual Total $13,068,611 $12,420,000 n/a n/a We I n/a n1s Compared to year -to -date 2011 - ■ Electricity is down by $73K or 2.4% due to decrease in consumption. • Gas is down by $103K or 7% mainly due decrease in consumption and to a 4% rate decrease effective November 1, 2011. • Solid Waste is up by $19K or 4.1% due to increase in consumption. • Cable is similar to prior year. • Phone is up by S48K or 7.6% mainly due to timing of payments; if this was taken into consideration; phone would show a decrease of $11K or 1.8% ■ Cellular phone is up by $86K or 5.4% mainly due to timing of payments; if this was taken into consideration; cellular would show a decrease of $51K or 3.3% due to decreases from major payors. UTILITY TAXES- by Type Year -to -date thru July tlti►lty Type 2011 Actual 2012 Actual Favorable✓(Unfavorable) Change from 2011 $ tlar %Ver Bectric $ 3,112,255 $ 3,039,001 $ (73,254) -2.4% Gas 1,463,632 1,361,030 (102,602) -7.0% Solid Waste 460,294 479,360 19,066 4.1% Cable 844,015 846,172 2,157 0.3% Phone 632,569 680,631 48,062 7.6% Cellular 1,577,593 1,663,564 85,972 5.4% Pager 267 275 8 3.1% SVW 141,284 1 157,062 j 15,777 j 11.2% Tax Rebate (26,500) (27,081) (581)1 2.2% YTD Total $ 8,205,410 $ 8,200,014 $ (5,396) -0.1% Update on Proposition I Year -to -date 2012 Prop 1 expenditures total $1.6M or 53.2% of the $3M annual budget. Current life -to -date Prop 1 Utility tax collections total $16.2M and expenditures total $15.1M resulting in ending fund balance of $1.1A PROP 1 2011 2012 LIFE TO DATE Budget Actual Budget Actual Beginning Balance: 692,917 692,917 836,819 836,819 Na OPERATING FMVENLIES January 282,799 252,277 279,388 283,988 1,372,441 February 275,679 305,101 274,255 284,977 1 1,452,500 March 261,216 289,430 1 279,380 266,835 1,717,272 April 271,964 291,178 262,253 341,953 1,718,651 May 251,429 266,935 246,983 235,323 1,595,613 June 234,283 233,443 222,307 178,986 1,325,750 July 220,326 214,470 206,523 259,553 1,360,687 August 210,303 205,168 197,050 - 1,054,373 September 208,464 205,767 192,036 1,050,783 October 233,261 223,472 213,421 1,140,711 November 222,225 114,438 137,374 1,017,423 December 228,083 349,275 293,548 1,416,528 Total Prop I Revenues:__ 2,900,032 2,950,954 2,804,516 1,861,616 16,222,735'' 0130 1TING BCPENDrR1RES Public Safety Improvement Positions & Costs: Police Services (includes sworn positions, records clerk and indirect information Technology support costs)- 2,288,620 2,233,767 2,326,710 1,234,624 10,937,893 Court Services (includes Judge, Court Clerk Prosecutor, public defender contract, and indirect Inforrration Technology support) 381,764 345,031 392,683 207,374 1,848,959 Total Public Safety Improvement Positions & Costs 2,670,384 2,678,798 2,719,393 1,441,997 12,786,662 Community Safety Program Costs: Code Enforcement Officer* - - 318,857 Code Enforcement Civil Attorney 69,341 62,907 69,341 36,147 329,013 Park Maintenance 111,697 101,738 113,555 56,831 525,461 Total Community Safety Improvement Program Costs 181,038 164,646 182,896 92,978 1,173,331 Indirect Support - HRAnayst 44,586 26,109 44,586 15,966 197,944 SafeCily M&O 37,500 37,500 37,500 37,500 170,928 Subtotal Ongoing Expenditures 82,086 63,609 82,086 53,466 368,872 SafeCity Startup - - - - 189,066 Other Transfer - Prop 1 OT for Police 600,000 Subtotal Other Expenditures 789,066 Total Prop;? Expenditures: 2,933,608 2,907,052 1 2;984,375 1 1,586,442 15,116,121'' Total Ending Fund Balance: 659,441 836,819 1 666,960 1 1,099;993 1,104,611 *Code Enforcement Officer 1.0 FTE was frozen as part of the 2011/2012 Adopted Budget. * *Police Officer 2.0 FTE was frozen as part of the 2011/2012 Adopted Budget. Real Estate Excise Tax Compared to 2011 year -to -date actuals, collections are down $435K or 38.9 %. July's receipt of $84K is above July 2011's actual by $5K or 7.0% and below July 2012's projections by $49K or 36.7 %. Year -to -date collections are below year -to -date projections by $294K or 30.1 %. The decrease in January is due to the sale of the Palisades Apartments ($67.5M), Woodmark at Steel Lake - Retirement Community ($9.2M), business building located on Oh Ave S. ($4.4M), and a vacant lot located on 19* Ave ($2.OM) in 2011. January 2012 sales included vacant land sold for $2.9M and Lowes Home Improvement store for $5.OM and March 2012 sale included the View at Redondo Apartments for $5.1M. The decrease June is mainly due to the sale of the Lodge Apartments in June 2011 for $51.8M. REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX REVENUES Year-to-date thru July Month 2011 Actual 2012 Favorablel(Linfavorab)e ) Change from 2011 2012 Actual vs Budget Budget Actual- ; Var %Var $ Var %16r Jan $ 461,865 $ 222,163 $ 79,285 $ (382,580) - 82.8% $ (142,878) - 64.3% Feb 44,769 102,363 46,041 1,272 2.8% (56,322) -55.0% Mar 67,758 139,094 90,054 22,296 32.9% (49,040) -35.3% Apr 77,333 107,639 86,114 8,781 11.4% (21,525) -20.0% May 55,008 134,800 98,819 43,811 79.6% (35,981) -26.7% Jun 332,852 138,765 199,060 (133,792) -40.2% 60,295 43.5% Jul 78,185 132,213 83,626 5,441 7.0% (48,587) -36.7% Aug 61,686 75,322 48,054 - - - Sep 179,226 91,924 - 8,517 - Oct 54,503 103,312 - 8,259 - - Nov 61,970 68,958 - - - - - Dec 85,239 83,449 - 10,154 - - - YTDTotal 1,117,771 977,038 682,999 (434,772) -38.9% (294,037) -30.1% Annual Total $1,580,394 $1,400,000 We We We We We July 2012 activities include 192 real estate transactions, of which 92 were tax exempt. July did not include any significant transactions. HotellMotel Lodging Tax Hotel/Motel lodging tax received year -to- date 2012 is $96K and is similar to prior year -to -date collections. 2012 year -to -date receipts are below year -to -date projections by $4K or 3.7 %. Gambling Tax Gambling tax collection received year -to -date 2012 is $124K, which is below 2011's year -to -date collections by $149K or 54.7% and below 2012 year -to -date projections by $5K or 3.9 %. The negative variance is mainly due to a card room establishment closing on January 31" 2012. NOTELx0 TEL LODOM16TAxR lUES Yaor -to-dote fhru July Month 2011 Actual 2012 Favorabtal(Wavorable) Change from 2011 2012Aetuat veBudget Budget :. Actual $filar %Wr ;War %Var Jan 10,925 $ 13,283 $ 12,246 $_.... 1,321 12.1% $ (1.037) -7.8% Feb 12,380 15,091 12,705 345 2.8% (2,385) -15.8% Mar 9,988 11,433 12,070 2,082 20.8% 638 5.6% Apr 12,823 13,883 14,3181 1,495 11.7% 455 3.3% May 16,038 17,065 17,670 1,634 10.2% 605 3.5% Jun 13,962 13,424 12,328 (1,654) -11.8% (1,095) -8.2% Jul 19,982 15,541 14,722 (5,260) -28.3% (819) 5.3% Aug 17,643 19,385 48,054 - - Sept 22,791 21,317 - 8,517 - Oct 21,043 22,818 - 8,259 - - Nov 12,532 16,317 - - - - - Doc 15,188 13,904 - 10,154 - - - YTDTotal $ 98,089 $ 999,889 $ 96,059 $ (37) 0.0%1$ (3,639) Annual Total $ 185,290 $ 193,440 Na I n/a Na I Na Na GA11f BUNG TAX REVENUE Year-- to- dateOwu July 2011 2012 FavorabNHUnfavorablo) Change from 2011 2012 Actual vs Budget Month Actual Budget Actual S tier I %Var $ Var %Var Jan $ 6,879 $ 36,274 $ 36,041 $ 29,162 423.9% $ (233) -0.6% Feb 63,306 48.733 12,082 (51,224) -80.9% (36,651) -75.2% Mar 55,169 18,139 16.266 (38.903) -70.5% 127 0.8% Apr 52,305 7,886 18,713 (33,592) -64.2% 10,827 137.3% May 35,055 6,885 9,010 (28,044) -74.3% 2,145 31.2% Jun 46,594 5.060 15,817 (30,777) -66.1% 10,757 212.6% Jul 13,735 7,641 15,714 1,979 14.4% 8,073 105.7% Aug 48,054 7,971 - - - sept 46,500 8,517 Oct 67,846 8,259 - - - - Nov 25,681 4,502 - - - Dec 49,882 10,154 - - - - - YTDTOtal $ 273,043 $ 128,597 S 123,643 $ (149,399) -64.7% $ (4,964) -3.9% Annual Total $ 511,006 $ 198,000 n/a n/a n/a Na I n/a State Shared Revenue Year -to -date 2012 distribution of $3.1M is above 2011's year - to -date activity by $88K or 2.9 %. The increase in liquor profits tax is due to the State auction of the State liquor stores. Per the State Treasurer's Office, the City will share in the additional revenues generated from the auctions of the State's liquor stores. The City qualified for Criminal Justice High Crime distribution for 2 °d half of 2012 through the first half of 2013. Criminal Justice High Crime will be reevaluated in June 2013 to determine if the City qualifies for the High Crime distribution July 13', 2013 through June 30'b, 2014. Permit Activity Building, planning, and zoning permit activities are above 2011's year -to -date activity by $330K or 54.1 %. Compared to year -to -date budget, permit activity is up $257K or 37.5 %. The increase in permit and fees is due to Federal Way Public Schools building a central kitchen at the Educational Service Center located across the street from City Hall, LTE antenna improvements to various locations, and a general up -tick in permit activity comparing year -to -date 2011 vs year -to -date 2012. Community Development's has a positive variance of $186K is mainly due to one -time items not yet spent including comprehensive plan update, graffiti operating and permit system upgrade. STATE SHARED REVENUES Year -to -date thru July Revenue 2011 Actual 2012 Actual Favorable /(Unfavorable Change from 2011 $ % Liquor Profits Tax $ 349,535 $ 486,684 $ 137,149 39.2% Liquor Excise Tax 326,741 329,166 2,425 0.7% CrimJust - Fbpulation/SP 70,965 71,380 415 0.6% Crininal Just Figh Crime 142,128 139,349 (2,779) -2.0% Local Crim Just Sales Tax 1,034,756 1,029,573 (5,184) -0.5% Fuel Tax" 1,063,698 1,021,242 (42,456) -4.0% DUI - Cities 14,514 12,638 (1,876) -12.9% YTD Total $ 3,002,338 1 $ 3,090,033 $ 87,694 2.9% • Fuel tax amount includes general /street, designated operating funds, and transportation CIP. BUILDING & LAND USE PERMITS AND FEES ICED) Year -to -date thru July Month 2011 Actual 2012 Change from 2011 FevoreblavyuufevoraWe) 2012 Actual vaBudget Budget T Actual $ % $ % Jan 116,720 79,081 194,017 77,297 66.2% 114,937 145.3% Feb 90,356 96,651 128,366 38,011 42.1% 31,715 32.8% Mar 70,100 94,905 116,115 46,015 65.6% 21,210 22.3% Apr 79,234 106,693 124,642 45,407 57.3% 17,949 16.8% May 85,035 96,332 144,559 59,523 70.0% 48,226 50.1% Jun 108,858 115,973 127,180 18,322 16.8% 11,207 9.7% Jul 59,971 94,153 105,418 45,446 75.8% 11,264 12.0% Aug 148,032 102,291 - - - - - Sapt 112,604 66,341 - - Oct 64,377 76,832 - - Nov 56,381 88,598 - - - Dec 109,021 87,296 - - - - YTDTotal 610, 274 683 ,788 940,297 330,023 64.1% 266,509 6.2% Annual Total 1,100,689 1,105,147 We We We n/a n/a Right -of -way permits and development services permit fees are up $12K or 6.2% when compared to year -to -date budget. This year - to- date increase is due to "plan check/right of way" fees received from projects that were completed and the projects were "closed" and fees reconciled. Overall, permit issuances remains at a lower level than previous years; this is due to residential, commercial and new plat activities remaining down due to economic conditions in the market place. Owners /developers are not proceeding with new plats since there is a surplus inventory of new homes, new lots which is slowing being consumed, and other financial issues. This is the same for the commercial market, there is an excess of existing office space and banks are more stringent on lending practices. Public Works Operations' year -to -date expenditures total $2.2M and is below year -to -date budget of $23M by $543K mainly due to savings found in one time electricity, traffic counts, repairs /maintenance, comprehensive plan update temporary help, and one -time gasoline increase. ROW PERMITS & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES F61S (PVII)' Year -to -date thru July Month 2011 Actual 2012 Change from 2011 Fa vorab/e/(unfavorable) 2012 Actual vs Budget Budget Actual $ % $ % Jan 12,685 19,744 22,028 9,343 73.7% 2,284 11.6% Feb 30,046 26,207 32,014 1,968 6.6% 5,807 22.2% Mar 22,477 18,580 22,341 (136) -0.6% 3,761 20.2% Apr 25,148 41,220 31,683 1 6,534 26.0% (9,537) -23.1% May 44,077 30,447 54,874 10,798 24.5% 24,428 80.2% Jun 20,973 26,311 13,564 (7,409) -35.3% (12,748) -48.4% Jul 13,224 24,941 22,639 9,416 71.2% (2,302) -9.2% Aug 32,050 24,411 - - - - Sept 11,764 14,438 Oct 29,359 29,713 - Nov 48,725 21,719 - - Dec 72,457 39,164 - YTDTotal 168,628 187,450 199,142 30,514 18.1% 11,692 6.2% Annual Total 362,983 316,895 n/a n/a n/a n/a We Police Department 2012 year -to -date expenditures total $12.7M and is below budget of $13M by $205K mainly due to vacancy and unspent one -time programs for grants and contributions. City portion overtime is $5K or 1.4% below year -to -date projections. Compared to year -to -date 2011 actuals, City portion overtime is $14K or 3.3% below prior year -to -date total. The increase in February is due to shift call in and shift extension in order to maintain minimum staffmg for community and officer safety. The department was experiencing an unusual number of officers who are on the injury list that is contributing to this shortage. In addition, there was mandatory training for firearms and emergency vehicle operations courses that also contributed to the overtime for those personnel who instructed. Including the increase in billable overtime, total overtime decrease $12K or 2.4 %. PD Overtime by Type Year- to- date 'thru July Type 2011 Actual 2012 Actual (Fa,vorab/e)Alnfavorable "- Change from 2011 $ Var %Var Training $ 6,055 $ 3,623 $ (2,432) -40.2% Court 20,442 23,757 3,315 16.2% Field Oper 308,356 305,765 (2,590) -0.8% Other 77,190 65,164 (12,026) -15.6% City Portion 412,041 398,309 (13,732) -3.3% Contract/Grant 60,899 71,742 10,843 17.8% Traffic School 21,495 12,726 (8,769) -40.8% Billable 82,394 84,468 2,073 2.5% YTD Total $ 494,435 1 $ 482,777 $ (11,859) -2A% The Overtime budget consists of $686K for City overtime and $134K for billable time. City portion of overtime includes $29K related to red light photo, which is currently not budgeted. PD Overtime by Month Year-to-date thru July Month 2012 Actual 2012 Favorsble fUnf0vwtAle? (Favorable )Wntavorabls 2011 2012 Actual Change m2011 1200 Actual vsBudget' Budget Actual $tzar I '%lllar $Vbr %Kar Jan $ 56,227 $ 58,465 $ 57,441 $ 1,215 2.2% $ (1,023) -1.8% Fab 56,219 46,306 65,486 9,267 16.5% 19,180 41.4% Whr 50,412 62,000 45,171 (5,241) -10.4% (16,829) -27.1% Apr 45,223 55,448 51,108 5,885 13.0% (4,340) -7.8% May 78,380 62,379 48,017 (30,362) -38.7% (14,362) -23.0% Jun 50,613 51,713 53,484 2,871 5.7% 1,771 3.4% Jul 74,968 67,480 77,602 2,634 1 3.5% 10,122 15.0% Aug 47,804 64,974 - - - - Sep 57,152 58,911 Oct - Oct 51,231 57,018 Nov 238,518 Nov 37,893 48,086 - - 1,002,810 Dec 45,231 52,847 M80: 1,882,851 City portion 412,041 403,791 398,309 (13,732) -3.3% (5,482) -1.4% Billable 82,394 79,952 84,468 2,073 2.5% 4,516 5.6% YTD Total $ 494,435 $ 483,743 $ 482,777 $ (11,659) -2AQA $ (988) -0.2% Annual Total $ 810,879 $ 819,708 n/a We n/a We n/a Jail Services Jail Services for year -to -date 2012 is $1.1M and is above year -to -date budget of $1.1 M by $49K or 4.5 %. Jail Services budget consists of $1.8M for SCORE Jail maintenance & operation, $50K for one -time non -score jail cost, $525K for debt service payment (of which $296K have been paid year -to -date) and $582K for one -time jail reserves. Compared to 2011 year -to -date actuals, jail services are down $746K or 39.6 %. The decrease is mainly due to switching over to the SCORE facility in which payments are based on a cost model. City of Federal Way portion of the maintenance and operations is $148K per month. Year -to -date maintenance and operations payment of $1.0M includes 7 months for SCORE. Jag Services Year io." ttxu July Month : 2011 2012 Favorsble fUnf0vwtAle? Change hrom 2011 2012 Actual we Budget Actual ,Budget Actual.. $Var`. %Yer Star %var Jan - 148,359 - 148,359 Feb 117,132 148,359 117,132 148,359 Mer 333,841 148,359 333,841 148,359 Apr 439,407 148,359 593,433 (154,026) -35.1% (445,074) - 300.0% May 372,173 1 148,359 148,473 223,699 60.1% (114) -0.1% Jun 377,181 148,359 148,358 228,823 60.7% 1 0.0% Jul 243,117 148,359 148,358 94,759 39.0% 1 0.0% Aug 376,901 148,359 - - Sep 539,521 148,359 Oct 263,614 148,359 Nov 238,518 148,359 - Dec 1,002,810 148,359 - M80: 1,882,851 1,038,513 1,038,623 844,228 44.8% (110) 0.0% Non-SCORE Jail /Altem. - 50,000 98,623 (98,623) n/a (48,623) -97.2% Subtotal Jail Cost: 1,882,851 1,088,513 1,137,246 745,605 39.6% (48,733) 4Ji% Debt Service: - 524,980 295,855 n/a Na n/a nha Jail Reserves: 581,712 - n/a n/a n/a nh1 Annual Total 1 4,304,216 1 2,937,000 n/a Na We nla nla Animal Services Previously animal services was administered by King County. The County had estimated that Federal Way would incur a cost of approximately $400K - $500K annually to continue the service agreement at full recovery cost. In July of 2010, the City formed its own Animal Services Division within the Police Department due to the anticipated increase in cost. In addition to cost savings the City would benefit from increased services. The adopted 2012 projected pet license revenues of $272K was based on 100% of King County license renewals and an increase in new licenses. This did not take into consideration the free licenses for Senior/Disabled, which account for approximately 26% of the total licenses issued annually or $33K if based on $25 licensing fee. The projected pet license revenues was reduced to $153K during the Mid - Biennium budget adjustment. The $332K expenditure budget includes funding for two animal services officers, shelter, administrative hearings, supplies, dispatch services and internal services charges for the City's information technology and fleet/equipment services. The budgeted cost is $183K (revenues of $153K less expenditures of $337K) which is substantially lower than the anticipated cost of $400K - $500K had the City retained King County's services. On a year -to -date basis, revenues total $44K which is $22K or 33.7% below year -to -date 2011 and $56K or 56.1% below year -to- date projections. Year -to -date expenditures total $136K resulting in a net cost of $92K, which is substantially less expensive than King County. The Police Department has taken various steps to increase licensing compliance, including: comparing current licenses against King County's database; sending reminders to pet owners who have not complied; advertising the licensing law; including a licensing flyer in utility bills; working with multi - family home complexes to place license brochure in new resident folder; providing licensing brochure to local vets and pet stores; animal services booth at local farmers market; pet license enforcement; and the department current has volunteers calling pet owners directly to remind them to renew their expired pet license. Year -to -date 2012, the Department issued 1,433 paid licenses and 234 free licenses for permanent disabled/senior permanent/service animal which generates $0 for pet license revenues. The tables below provide a summary of revenues & expenditures and licenses issued by type. Animal Services thru year to4ste May 2011 2042 Favorablet nfavorabRa # $ Chg from 2011 212 AcL va Bud g. Annual' Budget Annual Total YTD Total Annual Budget ; YTO Budget YTO Actual S % $ 25.00 % Operating Revenues 562 $ 14,050 (650) $ (16,250) Renewal - Unaltered Cat $ 60.00 1 $ 60 1 $ 60 Pet Licenses $ 102,000 $ 95,481 $ 62,541 $ 153,000 $100,217 $ 38,156 $ (24,385) -39.0% $ (62,061) -61.9% Misc/Donations 3,690 3,902 3,802 $ 2,460 - 5,846 2,044 $ 25.00 5,846 - Total Operating Revenue $ 105,690 $ 99,383 $ 66,343 $ 153,000 $100,217 $ 44,002 $ 22,341) 33. $ (56,215) 36.1 Operating Expenditures New - Unaltered Dog $ 60.00 43 $ 2,580 82 $ 4,920 39 $ 2,340 Hobby Kennel /Cattery $ 50.00 Personnel 153,835 110,189 74,663 160,217 93,460 79,958 (5,295) -7.1% 13,502 14.4% Shelter 100,000 61,380 25,486 100,000 34,176 20,650 4,836 19.0% 13,526 39.6% Supplies 7,500 1,051 465 7,500 3,318 1,875 (1,410) - 1,444 - Administrative Hearings 10,000 1,120 750 10,000 6,696 250 500 - 6,446 $ ' 38,010 Other Services & Charges - 1 946 421 - 1,�2 1,970 (1,549) - (1,970) - Dispatch Services* 20,000 20,000 11,667 20,000 11,667 11,667 - - - Service* 34,460 34,460 20,102 34,460 20,102 20,102 - - - -Internal Total Operating Expenditure $ 325,795 $ 229,146 $133,554 $ 332,177 $169,419 $136,472 $ (2,918) -2.2° $ 32,947 19.4 One -time Other Operating 4,690 - - 4,690 - - - - Rev Overt (Under) Exp , $(224,795) $(120.763)T$(07.2 11) 8(183.867) $ (69,243) $ (92,470) $ (26.259) 37.$W (23.267) < ` * Dispatch and internal service charges are shown in the table to more accurately reflect total animal service cost and are assumed to be fully expended. These charges are not easily tracked separately and therefore accounted within the total police internal service charges and dispatch services. License Type Fee 2011 YTO Total 2012 < YTD Total Favombiet(Unfavorabie) change from 2011 # $ # $ # $ Renewal - Altered Cat $ 20.00 625 $ 12,500 224 $ 4,480 (401) $ (8,020) Renewal - Altered Dog $ 25.00 1,212 $ 30,300 562 $ 14,050 (650) $ (16,250) Renewal - Unaltered Cat $ 60.00 1 $ 60 1 $ 60 - $ - Renewal - Unaltered Dog $ 60.00 102 $ 6,120 28 $ 1,680 (74) $ (4,440) New - Altered Cat $ 20.00 133 $ 2,660 123 $ 2,460 (10) $ (200) New - Altered Dog $ 25.00 332 $ 8,300 412 $ 10,300 80 $ 2,000 New - Unaltered Cat $ 60.00 - $ - 1 $ 60 1 $ 60 New - Unaltered Dog $ 60.00 43 $ 2,580 82 $ 4,920 39 $ 2,340 Hobby Kennel /Cattery $ 50.00 - $ - 2 $ 100 2 $ 100 Replacement Tag $ 2.00 11 $ 22 23 $ 46 12 $ 24 Permanent Disabled $ - 113 $ 36 $ - (77) $ - Senior Permanent $ 838 $ 197, $ (641) $ Service Animal $ 5 $ 1 i $ (4) $ Total Paid Llo *nsas: ` $446 $ 62,520 1,433 $ ' 38,010 (1,016) $ (24,610) Total PaidiFrse Licenses 8 Rapt"Ornant Tag Isswd 3,416 $ 62,641 1,�2 $ 38,156 (1,723) $ (24.3861 Traffic Safety/Red Light Photo Enforcement Red light photo revenues are accounted for in the Traffic Safety Fund to be used for, but not limited to, prevention, education, and enforcement efforts related to traffic safety and compliance with traffic control devices within the City, including maintenance and operations costs. Currently there are a total of 14 cameras at 11 locations (8 of these cameras are red light and 6 are in the school zones). The original 4 red light cameras were activated in October 2008 and an additional 4 cameras were activated February 2010. The original 4 school zone cameras were activated February 2010 and an additional 2 cameras were activated December 2010. Payments to ATS include $4,750 /month per location plus supplemental fees for check processing. Year -to -date red light photo net revenues total $ I AM which is exceeding year -to -date 2011 actual by $746K. The overall increase is due to increases in citations issued for the school zone cameras. It is expected that the number of violations should decrease over time because of red light photo implementation. The City's goal is improving safety; it is working and as a result revenues should be diminishing moving forward. Red Light Photo Enforcement 2011 2012 Favorabb4Unfavornbt0 2012 vs 2011 Net Revenue Month Gross Revenue Payments to ATS Net Revenue' Gross Revenue payments toATS Net Revenue $ Variance % Variance'' Jan $ 150,039 $ (54,217) $ 95,822 $ 140,361 $ (52,910) $ 87,451 $ (8,372) -8.7% Feb 159,379 (54,831) 104,548 163,551 (53,000) 110,551 6,002 5.7% Mar 173,031 (56,674) 116,357 230,342 (53,233) 177,109 60,752 52.2% Apr 156,321 (54,707) 101,615 224,418 (53,323) 171,095 69,480 68.4% May 129,070 (54,740) 74,331 340,862 (53,689) 287,173 212,843 286.3% Jun 168,322 (54,711) 113,611 377,420 (53,759) 323,661 210,049 184.9% Jul' 87,649 (53,611) 34,039 282,507 (53,000) 229,507 195,469 574.3% Aug 78,868 (51,695) 27,173 - - - - - Sep 92,298 (39,775) 52,523 - - - - - Oct 98,992 (48,085) 50,907 - - - - - Nov 129,433 (48,184) 81,249 - - - - - Dec 146,395 (52,964) 93,431 - - - - - YTDTotal $ 1,023,812 $ (383,488) $ 640,324 $ 1,759,460 $ (372,913) $1,386,547 $ 746,224 116.5% Annual Total $ 1,569,797 $ (624,191) $ 945,606 We Na We Na Na Annual Budgetl n/a I n/a 830,000 n/a n/a 830,000 Na Na *July payment to A 7 of $53K is an estimate; July invoice was not received by month end closing. Court Municipal Court year -to -date expenditures total $826K and is below budget of $926K by $99K. The positive variance is mainly due to savings found in temporary help (for pro tern judges), court security, and interpreter costs. Court revenues are $34K or 3.8% below 2011 year -to -date actuals and $40K or 4.4% below 2012 year -to -date budget. COURT REVENUE Year -to -date thru July Month 2011 Actual 2012 Favorablel(Unfavorable) $ Var Change from 2011 2012 Actual vs Budget Budget Actual ' $ Var %Ver $ Var %Var January $ 86,717 $ 87,284 $ 87,425 $ 708 0.8% $ 141 0.2% February 110,982 111,708 128,437 17,455 15.7% 16,728 15.0% March 190,183 191,427 157,534 (32,649) -17.2% (33,893) -17.7% April 131,430 132,290 108,288 (23,142) -17.6% (24,002) -18.1% May 118,146 118,919 126,103 7,957 6.7%1 7,184 6.0% June 102,567 103,239 106,684 4,117 4.0% 3,445 3.3% July 111,494 112,223 103,542 (7,952) -7.1% (8,681) -7.7% August 136,562 137,456 - - - - September 112,110 112,844 - - - - October 119,352 120,132 - - - - - November 88,438 89,016 - - - - - December 114,193 114,940 - - - - -1 Subtotal $ 851,519 $ 857,091 $ 818,013 $ (33,505) -3.9% $ (39,077) -4.6% Probation Svcs 46,724 46,796 45,889 (835) -1.8% (907) -1.9% YTD Total $ 898,244 $ 903,887 $ 863,902 $ (34,342) -3.8% $ (39,983) -4.4% Annual Total 1,496,061 1,505,479 n/a n/a I n/a We n/a 'Year -to -date budget is based on 2011 trends. The Court's increased workload and the resulting revenue from the photo enforcement program are not accounted for in the Court's revenue or expense projections. The negative variance is mainly due to decrease in traffic & non - parking along with criminal costs. COURT REVENL E Year -to -date thru July 2011 " Actual 2012 Actual Favorablel(Unfavorable) Change from 2011 $ Var %Var Civil Penalties $ 13,190 $ 10,728 $ (2,462) -18.7% Traffic & Non- Parking 539,573 489,628 (49,945) -9.3% Parking Infractions 31,925 26,846 (5,080) - 15.9% DUI & Other Misd 38,704 61,752 23,048 59.6% Criminal Traffic Misd 822 1,117 295 35.9% Criminal Costs 77,752 62,014 (15,737) -20.2% Interest / Other / Misc 40,998 46,394 5,396 13.2% Criminal Conv Fees 31,577 41,921 10,344 32.8% Shared Court Costs 22,466 22,663 197 0.9% Services & Charges 54,512 54,950 439 0.8% Subtotal $ 851,519 $ 818,013 $ (33,505) -3.9 Probation Services 46,724 45,889 (835) -1.8% YTD Total $ 898,244 $ 863,902 $ (34,342) -3.8% Parks & Recreation includes administration, parks maintenance and general recreation. Year -to -date expenditures total $2.1M and is below year -to -date budget of $2.3M by $250K. Parks savings of $250K are comprised of $169K in one -time programs not yet spent, $19K in repairs and maintenance, $16K in other services & charges, $25K in supplies, and $21K in temporary/seasonal help and related benefits. General Recreation and Cultural Services Direct program expenditures total $585K excluding indirect costs. Including indirect administration costs, recreation expenditures total $736K. Recreation fees total $536K. Recreation fees recovered 91.7% of direct costs and is 2.3% above the budgeted recovery ratio of 89.4 %. Considering indirect administration costs, the recovery ratio is reduced to 72.9% or is 1.5% above with the budgeted recovery ratio of 71.4 %. Program subsidy is established during the adopted budget process; increase in new or existing program expenditures require approval. Total Parks revenues of $539K is $19K or 3.5% below year -to -date budget of $558K. Compared to year -to -date actual, general recreation is below 2011's activity of $569K by $31K. Variance compared to year -to -date 2011 actual is due to: • Adult Athletics - Revenues are down $26K mainly due to rained out tournaments delaying new leagues, timing of league billings, and lower participation in volleyball and softball. Expenses are up $11K from 2011 due to increased temp help and purchase of new equipment. • Youth Athletics - Revenues are down $6K from 2011 due to timing of youth softball program, expenses are down $3K from 2011. • Senior Services - Revenues are down $6K due to inclement weather cancelling trips that have been rescheduled to a later date. Expenses are down $3K due to temp help not needed for cancelled trips. Trips and tours were well attended and the drop -in programs at the FWCC continue to grow. • Community Recreation - Revenues are up $11K and expenses are on target from 2011. Special interest classes such as babysitting, cooking, and yoga have done very well. Preschool education keeps adding classes that fill to capacity. Summer camp began June 18 and is running at full capacity with 150+ kids per week. • Recreation Inc. - Revenues are on target and expenses are up by $42K from 2011. Special Olympic sports and summer camping trips are running at capacity. Some of these programs are staffed entirely by volunteers. The increase in expenses is due to the loss of funding for half of 1.0 FTE Recreation Inc. Coordinator which was previously funded by Highline Community College. This position is now being funded .50 FTE by an increase in overall revenues and .50 FTE by CDBG grant. • Arts & Special Events - Revenues are down $7K and expenses are down $5K from 2011. Revenues are down mostly due to decrease in attendance for dance classes and events. Staff is working hard to promote new classes and reduce expenses to improve the success of these programs. The table below is a comparison of budgeted versus actual subsidy and recovery ratio by program. GENERAL RECREATION PERFORMANCE Year -to -date thru July Program Budget Actual Revenue" Expend Subsidy Recovery Ratio Revenue Expend Subsidy Recovery Ratio Variance Subsidy GENERAL RECREATION Steel Lake Aquatics 2,000 20,360 18,360 9.8% - 12,906 - n/a n/a Arts & Special Events 163,947 156,867 (7,080) 104.5% 55,580 68,472 12,892 81.2% (19,972) Youth Athletics 35,200 100,827 65,627 34.9% 12,769 37,676 24,907 33.9% 40,720 Adult Athletics 183,000 139,985 (43,015) 130.7% 112,166 80,331 (31,835) 139.6% (11,180) Community Recreation 400,000 342,037 (57,963) 116.9% 243,864 181,497 (62,366) 134.4% 4,404 Recreation Inc 51,067 122,715 71,648 41.6% 51,748 99,612 47,863 52.0% 23,785 Youth Commission - 1,800 1,800 n/a - - - We 1,800 Red, White & Blue 21,550 36,000 14,450 59.9% 17,193 33,143 15,950 n/a (1,500) Senior Services 75,000 122,227 47,227 61.4% 43,063 71,308 28,245 60.4% 18,983 Subtotal Direct Cost $ 931,764 $1,042,818 $ 111,054 89.4° $ 536,383 $ 584,945 $ 48,562 91.7 $ 62,492 Administration - 262,083 262,083 n/a - 151,227 151,227 We 110,856 Total General Recreation including indirect Cost $ 931,764 $1,304,900 $ 373,136 71.4% $ 536,383 $ 736,172 $ 199,788 72.9 $173,348 *Annual budgeted revenues of $931,764 does not include $5,600 budgeted for Arts Commission. When included, total budget revenues for Parks and General Recreation total $937, 364, which equals the General /Street Summary page for Parks and General Recreation budgeted revenues. Year -to -date actual reported on the General /Street Summary page for Parks and General Recreation total $538,531 which includes $2,147 for Celebration Park not reported as part of the $536,383 above. Federal Wav Communi Center The Federal Way Community Center Fund was established as a special revenue fund supported by user fees and designated utility tax transfer. Personnel Costs 2011 " 2012 YTD Budget vs Actual Federal Way Favorable /(Unfavorable)'', 777,360 Annual YTO Supplies YTD 139,389 Community Center Budget Actual Actual Budget Budget Actual -- $ % Beginning Fund Balance $ 780,753 $ 780,753 $ 780,753 $ 967,942 $ 967,942 $ 967,942 n/a n/a Revenues 380,000 180,244 176,922 3,322 1.8% Intergovernmental 20,500 26,427 Wily Drop-ins $3 52,62 2 $ 306,463 $ 206,866 $ 352,622 $ 238,024 $ 205,545 $ (32,479) -13.6% Passes 630,000 747,876 441,494 630,000 371,908 483,786 111,878 30.1% City Staff Membership - Employee 43,500 30,378 23,795 43,500 34,073 25,783 (8,290) -24.3% City Staff Membership - Family - 3,453 3,423 - -2.4% 1,246 1,246 n/a Youth Athletic Programs 35,000 45,258 28,870 35,000 22,327 30,628 8,301 37.2% Open Gy Indoor Playground - - - - - n/a Aquatics Programs-Lessons/Classes 116,000 131,034 90,999 116,000 80,559 93,479 12,921 16.0% Childcare Fees 9,000 91607 5,986 9,000 5,608 5,902 294 5.2% Fitness Classes/Fitness Training 85,000 107,023 62,739 85,000 49,829 64,886 15,057 30.2% Tow eVequipmentRentals 7,000 4,205 2,828 7,000 4,708 2,693 (2,016) -42.8% Pool Rentals /Competitive -Lap Lanes 19,000 16,267 9,816 19,000 11,465 10,282 (1,183) -10.3% 11 Rentals 223,300 193,810 109,775 226,500 128,290 126,058 (2,232) -1.7% Merchandise Sales 10,000 6,658 4,147 10,000 6,228 5,915 (31 3) -5.0% ConcessionsNending - 151 23 - 704 704 n/a Interest Eamings/Other Msc Revenues - 952 889 - - 1,340 1,340 Na General ParklRec - Facility use charge 25,000 25,000 14,581 25,000 14,581 14,582 1 0.0% Total Revenue 1,555,422 1,628,135 1,006,231 1,558,622 967,601 1,072,829 105,228 10.9% Personnel Costs 1,303,919 1,302,897 764,805 1,301,607 764,047 777,360 (13,313) 71.7% Supplies 146,750 139,389 67,192 146,750 70,740 84,565 (13,825) -19.5% Other Services & Charges 176,300 161,107 74,896 176,300 81,958 91,990 (10,032) -12.2% Utility Cost 380,000 398,198 188,876 380,000 180,244 176,922 3,322 1.8% Intergovernmental 20,500 26,427 15,293 20,500 11,863 13,803 (1,940) -16.4% capital _ - - - _ - Na Internal Service Charges 115,370 102,707 67,299 116,898 76,598 68,755 7,843 10.2% Total Expenditures 2,142,839 2,130,726 1,178,360 2,142,055 1,185,450 1,213,396 (27,946) -2.4% Operating Rev Over/ (Under EKp) Other Sources Utility Tax - Reserves Utility Tax - Operations Total Other Sources Other Uses Capital/Use of Reserves Bad Debt Expense Total Other Uses Net Income (587,417)1 (502,591)1 (172,128)1 (583,433)1 (217,849)1 (140,567)1 77,2821 35.5 %1 106,000 193,408 - 87,000 - - - rva 590,000 502,5 92 172,129 619,000 211,997 185,530 26,467 12.5% 696,000 696,000 172,129 706,000 211,997 185,530 26,467 12.5% 8,883 6,219 - 46,590 35,707 35,707 - 0.0% 52,175 44,962 44,962 - Na 8,883 6,219 - 98,765 80,669 80,669 - 0.0% 99,700 1 187,190 1 1 1 23,802 1 (86,522) 1 (35,706)l 50,815 1 58.7% Ending Fund Balance 1 $ 880,452 1 $ 967,942 1 $ 780,752 $ 991,744 1 $ 881,420 1 $ 932,234 1 $ 50,815 5.8% Operating Recovery Ratio 1 72.6 °k 76.4 °k 85.40 72.8% 81.6% 88.4% n/a n/a The operating revenue budget includes $1.6M in user fees /program revenues, $619K contribution from utility tax for operations, $87K contribution from utility tax for reserves, and $25K use charge from General Fund Recreation for use of the facility. 2012 year -to -date operating revenues total $1.1 M and is $105K or 10.9% above the year -to -date budget. In comparison to 2012's year -to -date budget: • Daily Drop -in revenues are $32K or 13.6% below mainly due to staffing efforts to up -sell daily guests to Membership Passes. • Pass revenues are $112K or 30.1% above due to marketing and membership retention efforts and high attendance in group exercise and aquatics programs for families. Strong program offerings are helping bring in new customers and retain current ones; in particular the addition of Group Ride and Specialty Training courses. • Youth Athletic program revenues are $8K or 37.2% above due to higher than usual participation in Passholder P.E., Kidz Love Soccer and Basketball Life Federal Way Community Center (continued) • Fitness Classes are $15K or 30.2% above due to high enrollment in Silver Sneakers, Specialty Fitness Training classes and Personal Training programs. • Aquatic Programs are $13K or 16.0% above due to high enrollment in swim lessons, including adult private swim lessons. ■ Towel/equipment rental revenues are down $2K or 42.8% due to climbing rental gear being added as a membership perk. • Pool Rentals /Competitive Lap Lanes are $1K or 10.3% below due to decreased club and school use. • Rental Revenues are $2K or 1.7% below due mostly to timing of gym and special event rental payments. July year -to -date operating expenditures total $1.2M and is $28K or 2.4% above year -to -date budget. Federal Way Community Center has recovered 88.4% of operating expenditures compared to the budgeted recovery ratio of 72.8 %. In comparison to 2012's year -to -date budget: • Personnel Costs are $13K or 1.7% above due to increased instructor costs of adding Group Ride & Specialty Training courses. Increased expenses offset by excess membership and fitness class revenues. • Supply Costs are $14K or 19.5% above due to increased facility usage increasing consumption of household and maintenance supplies. There have also been a few significant equipment replacement purchases for facility systems. • Other Services & Charges are $I OK or 12.2% above due to increases in personal training programs. Also, there was an increase in repairs and maintenance for fitness equipment and boiler. City's contribution of $706K for the Community Center was scheduled to annually provide $619K for maintenanceloperations and $87K for capital reserves. Year -to -date, $186K is needed to cover maintenance and operations. Dumas Bay Centre Fund In the 2011/2012 Adopted Budget process, Council approved combining Dumas Bay Centre and Knutzen Family Theatre for accounting purposes and is referred to as the Dumas Bay Centre Fund. Dumas Bay Centre Fund year -to -date operating revenue of $368K is above by $28K compared to year -to -date budget of $340K. Year -to -date revenues are $43K more than 2011 due to increased food services and rental activity. Year -to -date operating expenditures total $360K, which is $35K or 8.9% below year -to -date budget of $395K. Expenses are down $13K from year -to -date 2011 due to marketing plan expenses that only took place in 2011. Ending fund balance for Dumas Bay Centre Fund is a positive $227K, of which $115K is earmarked for repairs and maintenance. Dumas Bay Centre Fund Year to -date thru July 2011 Annual YTD Budget Actual Actual 3012 YTD YTD - Budget Budget Actual YTD 'Budget vs Actual' Favorabiel(un#avorabie) $ % Beginning Fund Balance 146,981 146,981 146,981 101,328 101,328 101,330 n/a n/a Revenues In- Flouse Food Services Operations & Interest 264,029 248,824 142,593 1 266,589 152,774 150,221 (2,553) -1.7% Dumas Bay Retreat Operations & Interest 317,289 313,159 182,356 321,143 187,005 218,011 31,006 16.6% KFT Operations & Interest - 40 43 - - - Wa- Total Operating Revenue 681,318 562,023 324,992 587,732 339,779 1 368,232 28,452 8.4 Expenditures Food Services 242,637 231,800 132,749 245,059 140,342 138,831 1 1,510 1.1% DBC Retreat Operations 355,233 336,434 190,615 358,357 203,036 177,604 25,432 12.5% KFT Theatre Operations 85,095 81,586 50,587 85,095 52,763 43,734 9,029 17.1% Total Operating Expenses 682 ,964 649,819 373,951 688,510 396,141 360,169 35,971 9.1 Operating Revenue Over /(Under) Exp (101,646) (87,796) (48,969) (100,778) (56,362) 8,062 64,424 114.3 Recovery Ratio 85.12% 86.49% 86.91% 85.36% 85.77% 102.24% n/a We DBC-GF Transfer for Punp Station - - - 23,500 23,500 23,500 - n/a DBC Maint. -GF Transfer for Runp Station MO - - - 4,000 4,000 4,000 - n/a KFT- Utility Tax Transfer 113,000 113,000 113,000 113,000 113,000 113,000 - n/a Total Other Sources 113,000 113,000 113,000 140,500 140,500 140,500 We Marketing Study & Implementation 37,118 37,118 37,118 - - - n/a Punp Station M&O - - - 4,000 - - - We Repairs & Maintenance 38,618 33,737 15,150 137,056 22,476 22,476 - 0.0% Total Other Uses 75,736 70,865 52,268 141,056 22,476 22,476 We Net Income (64,383) (45,651) 11,773 (101,334) 61,662 126,086 64,424 104. Ending Fund Balance 82,598 101,330 1 158,764 1 (6) 162,990 1 227,416 64,426 39. Other Departmental Year -to -date Variances City Council expenditures total $245K and is below year -to -date budget by $7K mainly due to savings in travel/training. Mayor's Office expenditures total $613K and is below year -to -date budget by $74K mainly due to savings found in public defender and recovery grant not yet spent. Human Services expenditures total $305K and is below year -to -date budget by $15K mainly due to savings found in salaries/benefits. Economic Development expenditures total $81K and is below year -to -date budget by $46K mainly due to one -time program for downtown redevelopment. Human Resources expenditures total $422K and is below year -to -date budget by $75K mainly due to savings. in one -time programs not yet spent and savings found in professional services compared to year -to -date budget. Finance expenditures total $499K and is below year -to -date budget by $23K mainly due to minor savings found in temporary help and overall salaries/benefits. Law expenditures total $813K and is below year -to -date budget by $138K mainly due to savings found in salary/benefits, unspent one -time monies for outside counsel. CASH & INVESTMENTS Currently all excess balances are invested in the State Investment Pool. The portfolio yield is 0.18 %, which is above the average 6- month US Treasury Bill (0.15 %). The total invested balance at the end of July is $24.5M. The state pool is composed of treasury securities (15.75 %), interest bearing bank deposits (4.23 0/o), agency floating rate notes (13.22 0/o), agency variable rate notes (8.59 0/o), discount notes (19.32 0/o), certificates of deposit (0.83 0/o), repurchase agreements (35.45 %), and MON accounts (2.60 %). SIP Average Invested Balance by Type Interest Rates Comparison July 2012 For the Month of July 2012 Treasury S Bank _ SecurWes Deposits 15.75% 4.23% Repurchase ■6 Month T -BIII Agency Agreements Floating ate 35.45% ■ State Investment Pod Notes 13.22% o In -house Investment Agency ■ Portfolio Average 1.0% Variable Rate 0.0% Notes pipyy 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 8.59% Accounts Certificates of Discount 2.60% Deposit Notes 0.83% 19.32% Interest Rates Comparison For the Month of July 2012 6.0% _ 5.0% ■6 Month T -BIII 4.0%- ■ State Investment Pod 3.0% o In -house Investment 2.0% ■ Portfolio Average 1.0% 0.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 FUND ACTIVITY SUMMARY Fund #/Fund Name - Beginning Fund Balance an 11112012 YTD Revenue YTD Expenditure YTD Net Income /(lass) Ending Fund Balance on 713112012 0011101 GeneradStreetFund: 12,743,855 23,524,086 24,630,802 (1,106,716) 11,637,138 201 Debt Service Fund: 3,866,184' 971,025 1,343,531 (372,506) 3,493,678 Special Revenue Funds: 102 Arterial Street 469,704 1,324,568 1,397,138 (72,570) 397,134 103 U61ityTax( ") 4,170,868 8,201,441 6,228,501 1,972,940 6,143,805 106 Solid Waste & Recycling 153,980 164,981 224,481 (59,500) 94,480 107 Special Contracts/Studies Fund 556,753 163 27,435 (27,272) 529,481 109 HotelMbtel Lodging Tax 213,484 96,092 262,948 (166,857) 46,627 110 2% for the Arts 293 - - 293 111 Federal Way Community Center 967,943 1,258,359 1,294,065 (35,706) 932,234 112 Traffic Safety Fund 557,077 1,387,021 1,263 1,385,758 1,942,835 119 CDBG 48,712 255,310 266,256 (10,946) 37,766 120 Path &Trails 151,807 90,014 155,000 (64,986) 86,821 Subtotal Special Revenue Funds: 7,790,621 12,777,949 9,857,088 2,820,864 10,211,482 Capital Project Funds: 301 Downtown Redevelopment 2,207,051 4,833 12,687 (7,854) 2,199,197 302 Municipal Facilities 1,285,610 385 25,348 (24,962) 1,260,648 303 Parks 2,408,886 434,055 23,894 410,162 2,819,048 304 Surface Water Management 2,938,983 260,356 318,119 (57,763) 2,881,220 306 Transportation 13,809,678 2,386,611 1,896,400 490,211 14,299,889 Subtotal Capital Project Funds: 22,650,208 3,086,240 2,278,447 809,793 23,460,001 Enterprise Funds: 401 Surface Water Management 2,312,897 2,221,129 1,918,857 302,272 2,615,169 402 Dumas Bay Centre Fund 101,330 508,732 382,646 126,086 227,416 Subtotal F- rtterprise Tunas: 2,414,227 2,729,860 2,301,502 428,358 2,842,585 Internal Service Funds 501 Risk Management 5,431,782 732,960 836,799 (103,840) 5,327,942 502 Information Systems 3,417,861 1,214,737 889,116 325,620 3,743,481 503 Mail & Duplication 279,073 95,491 91,269 4,222 283,295 504 Fleet& Equipment 5,267,807 1,265,716 1,201,974 63,742 5,331,549 505 Buildings & Furnishings 1,462,490 365,875 238,300 127,575 1,590,065 Subtotal Internal Service Funds: 15,859,013 3,674,779 3,257,458 417,320 16,276,333 Total All Funds: 64,824,108' 46,763,939 43,666,828 1 3,097,111 67,921,218 ' Utility Tax ending fund balance of $6,143,805 includes $1,104,611 reserved for Prop 1. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 4, 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: 21 st Avenue SW at SW 336th St Intersection — 85% Design Status Report ITEM #: POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council authorize staff to proceed with design of the 21St Avenue SW at SW 336th Street Intersection Project and return to the LUTC and Council at the 100% design completion for further reports and authorization? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: August 6, 2012 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution P Other STAFF REPORT BY: Brian Roberts, P. E., Street Systems Project DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated August 6, 2012. Options Considered: ..... I ....................... . ................................................_...................................__........................_....................................................__..._................................................._..._.............._..._......_....._.... .......__._............_....... - -...- - .._.._._..... 1. Authorize staff to proceed with the design of the 21St Avenue SW at SW 336t" St Intersection Project and return to the LUTC and Council at the 100% design completion stage for further reports and authorization. 2. Do not authorize staff to proceed with finalizing the present design of this project and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the September 4, 2012 City Council Consent Agenda for approval. MAYOR APPROVAL: �� DIRECTOR APPROVAL: '/ 2401 omen ouncil Committee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Forward Option 1 to the September 4, 2012 City Council Consent Agenda for approval. "—Atob[�C!Ilski, Chair 4-A-k� Susan Honda. Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to authorize staff to proceed with the design of the 21" Ave SW at SW 336`h Street Intersection Project and return to the LUTC and Council at the 100% design completion stage for further reports and authorization. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED IST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED /NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED - 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION # CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: August 6, 2012 TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: Skip Priest, Mayor FROM: Brian Roberts, P.E., Street Systems Project Engineer QCary M. Roe, P.E., Director of Parks, Public Works mergency Management 94,k\ SUBJECT: 215' Avenue SW at SW 336th St Intersection — 85% Design Status Report BACKGROUND: On November 15, 2011, the City Council reviewed design alternatives for this project and selected the traditional intersection improvement alternative of constructing dual left -turn lanes eastbound and westbound and a right —turn lane westbound. This project will include access control along SW 336th Street and also install a new traffic signal west of the intersection to allow for left turn access into the businesses north and south of the roadway. Additional work will include utility relocation, storm drainage, paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, signing, channelization, and landscaping. The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. Currently, the project design is approximately 85% complete, which includes the following completed tasks: • The Topographical Surveys • Right of Way Plan • Channelization Plans • Project Design to 85% • 1 st Project Open House • Preliminary Contract Specifications Ongoing Tasks Include: • SEPA Review • Right of Way Requirements (Property Appraisals, Review Appraisals, Negotiation and Acquisition) • 2"d Project Open House scheduled for September 2012 • Project Design to 100% PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES: Design $ 600,000 ROW Acquisition 650,000 2012 Construction Cost 3,300,000 10% Construction Contingency 330,000 Construction Management 435,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 5,315,000 AVAILABLE FUNDING: TIB Grant $ 3,360,000 Budgeted City Funds 1,859,000 Mitigation 109,527 TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET $ 5,328,527 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CONTRACT FOR STATE LOBBYIST/PUBLIC AFFAIRS ITEM #: 5 POLICY QUESTION: Should the City of Federal Way contract with MJ Durkan, Inc. to provide state lobbyist and public affairs services for the budgeted amount of $65,000 per year COMMITTEE: FINANCE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, REGIONAL AFFAIRS MEETING DATE: August 28, 2012 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Chris Carrel, Communications Coordinator DEPT: Mayor's Office Overview The City of Federal Way has retained the services of a state lobbyist, for lobbying assistance at the State Legislative level since January 2001. During the previous Legislative Session, it was necessary to also contract with a separate lobbyist to pursue high - priority Sound Transit issues. The combined cost of both contracts was $80,543. Between 2005 and 2010, The City has also contracted with separate lobbying firms for amounts ranging from $40,000 to $62,000 per year to represent the City on federal issues. In keeping with the philosophy of frugal innovation, the Mayor's Office re- assessed the City's lobbying and public affairs needs and strategies, in anticipation of the expiration of the current state lobbyist contract term. In June, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a combined lobbying /public affairs contract that would include 1) State Lobbying, 2) Federal Lobbying, and 3) Economic Development. MJ Durkan, Inc. was the sole respondent. Proposed Costs Staff recommends the costs of the contract not to exceed the budgeted amount of $65,000 per year ($62,000 for services, $3,000 for expenses) for a total biennial amount of $130,000. Highlights from the Scope of Work Staff recommends the proposed contract and scope of work to provide a thorough and cost - effective lobbying and public affairs representation for the City, addressing state and federal lobbying, and economic development. The proposed contract will provide this complete suite of services at a $15,543 savings over 2011 state lobbying contract costs of $80,543. The state lobbying component of the scope of services is similar to past state lobbying scopes of services. The contractor, MJ Durkan, will work with the City to develop the City's 2013 and 2014 Legislative Agenda's prior to the Legislative sessions, develop a political strategy to successfully accomplish the agenda, support the City's legislative breakfast, and represent the City's issues to legislators, the Governor's Office and state agencies and others. In addition, the Contractor will work with the City to identify and prioritize outreach on federal issues and opportunities, including priority policy issues and identifying funding opportunities for key City projects and programs. The Contractor will work with City officials to attract major economic development to Federal Way and support the City's economic development objectives. MJ Durkan, Inc. is a highly- qualified and respected firm in the areas highlighted by the scope of services. Previous work for the City on Sound Transit in 2011 resulted in a $24 million allocation by Sound Transit for the South Link Project, as well as the addition of bus service to address overcrowding on Federal Way routes. Attachments: Proposed contract documents RFP Submittal Options Considered: 1) Authorize a two -year contract for MJ Durkan, Inc. not to exceed the budgeted amount. 2) Reject the state lobbyist/public affairs contract. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends authorizing the proposed contract with MJ Durkan, Inc. for State Lobbyist/Public Affairs services. MAYOR APPROVAL: � DIRECTOR APPROVAL: ommitt cou cil Initial COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to approve and forward the proposed Agreement to the September 4, 2012 consent agenda for approval. Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: `I move approval of the State Lobbyist /Public Affairs Agreement, effective October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2014 with a total compensation of $65, 000, and authorize the Mayor to sign said agreement. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED 1sT reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED — 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION # RETURN TO: EXT: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY LAW DEPARTMENT ROUTING FORM 1. ORIGINATING DEPT./DIV: (° ka-gw 2. ORIGINATING STAFF PERSON: CV 1 r\� CSI EXT: 3. DATE REQ. BY: 4. TYPE OF DOCUMENT (CHECK ONE): ❑ CONTRACTOR SELECTION DOCUMENT (E.G., RFB, RFP, RFQ) ❑ PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT ❑ SMALL OR LIMITED PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 4 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT ❑ MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT • GOODS AND SERVICE AGREEMENT ❑ HUMAN SERVICES / CDBG • REAL ESTATE DOCUMENT ❑ SECURITY DOCUMENT (E.G. BOND RELATED DOCUMENTS) ❑ ORDINANCE ❑ RESOLUTION ❑ CONTRACT AMENDMENT (AG #): ❑ INTERLOCAL ❑ OTHER 5. PROJECT NAME: 5 -r 7y Lo I P a b / , ic- A E Poi 1- 5 5w j i cc s 6. NAME OF CONTRACTOR: ftA.3 6 f K ant y iJ L, ADDRESS: 330 43 (v-' 5T• 'S c- k- 3 S -7 �IDN, W.A q 005S TELEPHONE 4 ?-5' 13 2 - E -MAIL: cvr✓► FAX: 4;L5 - 4 3 2 - 3 411 SIGNATURE NAME: M i r) :r Duflc4exj TITLE D t N c-� P- 7. EXHIBITS AND ATTACHMENTS: ❑ SCOPE, WORK OR SERVICES ❑ COMPENSATION ❑ INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS/CERTIFICATE ❑ ALL OTHER REFERENCED EXHIBITS ❑ PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO SIGN ❑ REQUIRED LICENSES ❑ PRIOR CONTRACT /AMENDMENTS 8. TERM: COMMENCEMENT DATE: O LToW -r (1 ).v I L- COMPLETION DATE: 5 qlr- M W 3D, 2-v l q 9. TOTAL COMPENSATION $ 1114,000 C b 2 i O00 `J �ta (INCLUDE EXPENSES AND SALES TAX, IF ANY) (IF CALCULATED ON HOURLY LABOR CHARGE - ATTACH SCHEDULES OF EMPLOYEES TITLES AND HOLIDAY RATES) REIMBURSABLE EXPENSE:q YES ❑ NO IF YES, MAXIMUM DOLLAR AMOUNT: $ G CIO D C $ 3,OW EC year) IS SALES TAX OWED ❑ YES ❑ NO IF YES, $ PAID BY: ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ CITY ❑ PURCHASING: PLEASE CHARGE TO: 10. DOCUMENT /CONTRACT REVIEW • PROJECT MANAGER • DIRECTOR • RISK MANAGEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) C> -LAW 11. COUNCIL APPROVAL (IF APPLICABLE) INITIAL / DATE REVIEWED INITIAL/ DATE APPROVED CAC- $ 2.1 17-- - CAc- Stu IZ COMMITTEE APPROVAL DATE: COUNCIL APPROVAL DATE: 12. CONTRACT SIGNATURE ROUTING • SENT TO VENDOR/CONTRACTOR DATE SENT: DATE REC'D: • ATTACH: SIGNATURE AUTHORITY, INSURANCE CERTIFICATE, LICENSES, EXHIBITS ❑ LAW DEPARTMENT • SIGNATORY (MAYOR OR DIRECTOR) • CITY CLERK • ASSIGNED AG# • SIGNED COPY RETURNED COMMENTS: INITIAL/ DATE SIGNED AG# DATE SENT: 11/9 This Professional Services Agreement ( "Agreement ") is made between the City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation ( "City "), and M.J. Durkan, Inc, a Washington Corporation ( "Contractor "). The City and Contractor (together "Parties ") are located and do business at the below addresses which shall be valid for any notice required under this Agreement: M.J. DURKAN, INC Martin J. Durkan 330 SW 43rd Street, Suite K -357 Renton, WA 98055 (425) 432 - 3961 (telephone) (425) 432 -3740 (facsimile) The Parties agree as follows: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY: Chris Carrel, Communications Coordinator 33325 8th Ave. S. Federal Way, WA 98003 -6325 (253) 253- 835 -2411 (telephone) (253) 253- 835 -2569 (facsimile) chris .carrel @cityoffederalway.com 1. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon October 1, 2012 and shall continue until the completion of the Work, but in any event no later than September 30, 2014 ( "Term "). This Agreement may be extended for additional periods of time upon the mutual written agreement of the City and the Contractor. 2. SERVICES. The Contractor shall perform the services more specifically described in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and incorporated by this reference ( "Services "), in a manner consistent with the accepted professional practices for other similar services within the Puget Sound region in effect at the time those services are performed, performed to the City's satisfaction, within the time period prescribed by the City and pursuant to the direction of the Mayor or his or her designee. The Contractor warrants that it has the requisite training, skill, and experience necessary to provide the Services and is appropriately accredited and licensed by all applicable agencies and governmental entities, including but not limited to obtaining a City of Federal Way business registration. Services shall begin immediately upon the effective date of this Agreement. Services shall be subject, at all times, to inspection by and approval of the City, but the making (or failure or delay in making) such inspection or approval shall not relieve Contractor of responsibility for performance of the Services in accordance with this Agreement, notwithstanding the City's knowledge of defective or non- complying performance, its substantiality or the ease of its discovery. 3. TERMINATION. Either party may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, upon providing the other party thirty (30) days written notice at its address set forth above. The City may immediately terminate this Agreement when it determines that the services are no longer desired. The City may also terminate this Agreement immediately if the Contractor fails to maintain required insurance policies, breaches confidentiality, or materially violates Section 12; and such may result in ineligibility for further City agreements. 4. COMPENSATION. 4.1 Amount. In return for the Services, the City shall pay the Contractor an amount not to exceed a maximum amount and according to a rate or method as delineated in Exhibit "B ", attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. The Contractor agrees that any hourly or flat rate charged by it for its services contracted for herein shall remain locked at the negotiated rate(s) for the Term. Except as otherwise provided in Exhibit "B ", the Contractor shall be solely responsible for the payment of any taxes imposed by any lawful jurisdiction as a result of the performance and payment of this Agreement. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - 1 - 9/2012 CITY OF CITY HALL 33325 3th Avenue SOUth Federal Way Federal Way, 'VVA 98003 -6325 - (253) 835 -7000 svgs =GV: ta;��czft�c�E:rtrfrv.�y earn 4.2 Method of Payment. On a monthly basis, the Contractor shall submit a voucher or invoice in the form specified by the City, including a description of what Services have been performed, the name of the personnel performing such Services, and any hourly labor charge rate for such personnel. The Contractor shall also submit a final bill upon completion of all Services. Payment shall be made on a monthly basis by the City only after the Services have been performed and within thirty (30) days after receipt and approval by the appropriate City representative of the voucher or invoice. If the Services do not meet the requirements of this Agreement, the Contractor will correct or modify the work to comply with the Agreement. The City may withhold payment for such work until the work meets the requirements of the Agreement. 4.3 Non - Appropriation of Funds. If sufficient funds are not appropriated or allocated for payment under this Agreement for any future fiscal period, the City will not be obligated to make payments for Services or amounts incurred after the end of the current fiscal period, and this Agreement will terminate upon the completion of all remaining Services for which funds are allocated. No penalty or expense shall accrue to the City in the event this provision applies. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. 5.1 Contractor Indemnification. The Contractor agrees to release, indemnify, defend, and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, representatives, insurers, attorneys, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, causes of action, arbitrations, mediations, proceedings, judgments, awards, injuries, damages, liabilities, taxes, losses, fines, fees, penalties expenses, attorney's fees, costs, and/or litigation expenses to or by any and all persons or entities, including, without limitation, their respective agents, licensees, or representatives; arising from, resulting from, or in connection with this Agreement or the acts, errors or omissions of the Contractor in performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the claims caused by the City's sole negligence. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Contractor and the City, the Contractor's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Contractor's negligence. Contractor shall ensure that each sub - contractor shall agree to defend and indemnify the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, representatives, insurers, attorneys, and volunteers to the extent and on the same terms and conditions as the Contractor pursuant to this paragraph. The City's inspection or acceptance of any of Contractor's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. 5.2 Industrial Insurance Act Waiver. It is specifically and expressly understood that the Contractor waives any immunity that may be granted to it under the Washington State industrial insurance act, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. Contractor's indemnification shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount of damages, compensation or benefits payable to or by any third party under workers' compensation acts, disability benefit acts or any other benefits acts or programs. The Parties acknowledge that they have mutually negotiated this waiver. 5.3 City Indemnification. The City agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the Contractor, its officers, directors, shareholders, partners, employees, agents, representatives, and sub - contractors harmless from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, causes of action, arbitrations, mediations, proceedings, judgments, awards, injuries, damages, liabilities, losses, fines, fees, penalties expenses, attorney's fees, costs, and/or litigation expenses to or by any and all persons or entities, including without limitation, their respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising from, resulting from or connected with this Agreement to the extent solely caused by the negligent acts, errors, or omissions of the City. 5.4 Survival. The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement with respect to any event occurring prior to such expiration or termination. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - 2 - 9/2012 CITY of CITY HALL 3335 8th Avenue South Federal Wa,&, Federal Way, V %1A 98003 -6325 (253) 835 -7000 �a c:.r vo,fitez;e:r<at�xJ yy o.r, 6. INSURANCE. The Contractor agrees to carry insurance for liability which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the services or work by the Contractor, their agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors for the duration of the Agreement and thereafter with respect to any event occurring prior to such expiration or termination as follows: 6.1. Minimum Limits. The Contractor agrees to carry as a minimum, the following insurance, in such forms and with such carriers who have a rating that is satisfactory to the City: a. Commercial general liability insurance covering liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors, products- completed operations, stop gap liability, personal injury, bodily injury, death, property damage, products liability, advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract with limits no less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence and $1,000,000 general aggregate. b. Workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance in amounts sufficient pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington; C. Automobile liability insurance covering all owned, non - owned, hired and leased vehicles with a minimum combined single limits in the minimum amounts required to drive under Washington State law per accident for bodily injury, including personal injury or death, and property damage. d. Professional liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate for damages sustained by reason of or in the course of operation under this Agreement, whether occurring by reason of acts, errors or omissions of the Contractor. 6.2. No Limit of Liability. Contractor's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Contractor to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. The Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect the City. Any insurance, self - insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 6.3. Additional Insured, Verification. The City shall be named as additional insured on all commercial general liability insurance policies. Concurrent with the execution of this Agreement, Contractor shall provide certificates of insurance for all commercial general liability policies attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated by this reference. At City's request, Contractor shall furnish the City with copies of all insurance policies and with evidence of payment of premiums or fees of such policies. If Contractor's insurance policies are "claims made," Contractor shall be required to maintain tail coverage for a minimum period of three (3) years from the date this Agreement is actually terminated or upon project completion and acceptance by the City. 6.4 Survival. The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 7. CONFIDENTIALITY. All information regarding the City obtained by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential subject to applicable laws. Breach of confidentiality by the Contractor may be grounds for immediate termination. All records submitted by the City to the Contractor will be safeguarded by the Contractor. The Contractor will fully cooperate with the City in identifying, assembling, and providing records in case of any public records disclosure request. 8. WORK PRODUCT. All originals and copies of work product, including plans, sketches, layouts, designs, design specifications, records, files, computer disks, magnetic media or material which may be produced or modified by Contractor while performing the Work shall belong to the City upon delivery. The Contractor shall make such data, documents, and files available to the City and shall deliver all needed or contracted for work product upon the City's request. At the expiration or termination of this Agreement, all originals and copies of any such work product remaining in the possession of Contractor shall be delivered to the City. 9. BOOKS AND RECORDS. The Contractor agrees to maintain books, records, and documents which sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs related to the performance of the Work and maintain such accounting procedures and practices as may be deemed necessary by the City to assure proper accounting of all funds paid pursuant to this Agreement. These records shall be subject, at all reasonable times, to inspection, review or audit by the City, its PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -3 - 9/2012 CITY OF _74& W6, CITY HALL 33325 3th Avenue South Federal Way, VIA 98003 -6325 2�3 0035 7G +00 r ,A: uv. ci ivof)odera+4va- v com authorized representative, the State Auditor, or other governmental officials authorized by law to monitor this Agreement. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Parties intend that the Contractor shall be an independent contractor and that the Contractor has the ability to control and direct the performance and details of its work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement. The City shall be neither liable nor obligated to pay Contractor sick leave, vacation pay or any other benefit of employment, nor to pay any social security or other tax which may arise as an incident of employment. Contractor shall take all necessary precautions and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of the contract work and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at Contractor's own risk, and Contractor shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. The Contractor shall pay all income and other taxes due except as specifically provided in Section 4. Industrial or any other insurance that is purchased for the benefit of the City, regardless of whether such may provide a secondary or incidental benefit to the Contractor, shall not be deemed to convert this Agreement to an employment contract. If the Contractor is a sole proprietorship or if this Agreement is with an individual, the Contractor agrees to notify the City and complete any required form if the Contractor retired under a State of Washington retirement system and agrees to indemnify any losses the City may sustain through the Contractor's failure to do so. 11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. It is recognized that Contractor may or will be performing professional services during the Term for other parties; however, such performance of other services shall not conflict with or interfere with Contractor's ability to perform the Services. Contractor agrees to resolve any such conflicts of interest in favor of the City. Contractor confirms that Contractor does not have a business interest or a close family relationship with any City officer or employee who was, is, or will be involved in the Contractor's selection, negotiation, drafting, signing, administration, or evaluating the Contractor's performance. 12. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER. In all services, programs, activities, hiring, and employment made possible by or resulting from this Agreement or any subcontract, there shall be no discrimination by Contractor or its subcontractors of any level, or any of those entities' employees, agents, subcontractors, or representatives against any person because of sex, age (except minimum age and retirement provisions), race, color, religion, creed, national origin, marital status, or the presence of any disability, including sensory, mental or physical handicaps, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification in relationship to hiring and employment. This requirement shall apply, but not be limited to the following: employment, advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. Contractor shall comply with and shall not violate any of the terms of Chapter 49.60 RCW, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans With Disabilities Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 49 CFR Part 21, 21.5 and 26, or any other applicable federal, state, or local law or regulation regarding non - discrimination. 13. GENERAL PROVISIONS. 13.1 Interpretation and Modification. This Agreement, together with any attached Exhibits, contains all of the agreements of the Parties with respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this Agreement and no prior statements or agreements, whether oral or written, shall be effective for any purpose. Should any language in any Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. The respective captions of the Sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed to modify or otherwise affect any of the provisions of this Agreement. Any provision of this Agreement that is declared invalid, inoperative, null and void, or illegal shall in no way affect or invalidate any other provision hereof and such other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. Any act done by either Party prior to the effective date of the Agreement that is consistent with the authority of the Agreement and compliant with the terms of the Agreement, is hereby ratified as having been performed under the Agreement. No provision of this Agreement, including this provision, may be amended, waived, or modified except by written agreement signed by duly authorized representatives of the Parties. 13.2 Assignment and Beneficiaries. Neither the Contractor nor the City shall have the right to transfer or assign, in whole or in part, any or all of its obligations and rights hereunder without the prior written consent of the other PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - 4 - 9/2012 Party. If the non - assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without additional written consent. Subject to the foregoing, the rights and obligations of the Parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors in interest, heirs and assigns. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the Parties hereto. No other person or entity shall have any right of action or interest in this Agreement based on any provision set forth herein. 13.3 Compliance with Laws. The Contractor shall comply with and perform the Services in accordance with all applicable federal, state, local, and city laws including, without limitation, all City codes, ordinances, resolutions, regulations, rules, standards and policies, as now existing or hereafter amended, adopted, or made effective. If a violation of the City's Ethics Resolution No. 91 -54, as amended, occurs as a result of the formation or performance of this Agreement, this Agreement may be rendered null and void, at the City's option. 13.4 Enforcement. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of its provisions in which performance is a factor. Adherence to completion dates set forth in the description of the Services is essential to the Contractor's performance of this Agreement. Any notices required to be given by the Parties shall be delivered at the addresses set forth at the beginning of this Agreement. Any notices may be delivered personally to the addressee of the notice or may be deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the address set forth above. Any notice so posted in the United States mail shall be deemed received three (3) days after the date of mailing. Any remedies provided for under the terms of this Agreement are not intended to be exclusive, but shall be cumulative with all other remedies available to the City at law, in equity or by statute. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this Agreement in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. Failure or delay of the City to declare any breach or default immediately upon occurrence shall not waive such breach or default. Failure of the City to declare one breach or default does not act as a waiver of the City's right to declare another breach or default. This Agreement shall be made in, governed by, and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the Parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claim arising from this Agreement, the exclusive means of resolving that dispute, difference, or claim, shall be by filing suit under the venue, rules and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an alternative process. If the King County Superior Court does not have jurisdiction over such a suit, then suit may be filed in any other appropriate court in King County, Washington. Each party consents to the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts in King County, Washington and waives any objection that such courts are an inconvenient forum. If either Party brings any claim or lawsuit arising from this Agreement, each Party shall pay all its legal costs and attorney's fees and expenses incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, including all appeals, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided, however, however nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the Parties' rights to indemnification under Section 5 of this Agreement. 13.5 Execution. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City and Contractor represents and warrants that such individual is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and with the same effect as if all Parties hereto had signed the same document. All such counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one instrument, but in making proof hereof it shall only be necessary to produce one such counterpart. The signature and acknowledgment pages from such counterparts may be assembled together to form a single instrument comprised of all pages of this Agreement and a complete set of all signature and acknowledgment pages. The date upon which the last of all of the Parties have executed a counterpart of this Agreement shall be the "date of mutual execution" hereof. [Signature page follows] PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - 5 - 9/2012 CITY OF te CITY HALL 33325 8th AvenUe South Feaeraf 'Nay 'VVA 98003 -6325 (253) 835 -7000 4'ii 4b`. C ',liypftBtiEF'Li1V:�3V..4'U ?� Party. If the non - assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without additional written consent. Subject to the foregoing, the rights and obligations of the Parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors in interest, heirs and assigns. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the Parties hereto. No other person or entity shall have any right of action or interest in this Agreement based on any provision set forth herein. 13.3 Compliance with Laws. The Contractor shall comply with and perform the Services in accordance with all applicable federal, state, local, and city laws including, without limitation, all City codes, ordinances, resolutions, regulations, rules, standards and policies, as now existing or hereafter amended, adopted, or made effective. If a violation of the City's Ethics Resolution No. 91 -54, as amended, occurs as a result of the formation or performance of this Agreement, this Agreement may be rendered null and void, at the City's option. 13.4 Enforcement. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of its provisions in which performance is a factor. Adherence to completion dates set forth in the description of the Services is essential to the Contractor's performance of this Agreement. Any notices required to be given by the Parties shall be delivered at the addresses set forth at the beginning of this Agreement. Any notices may be delivered personally to the addressee of the notice or may be deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the address set forth above. Any notice so posted in the United States mail shall be deemed received three (3) days after the date of mailing. Any remedies provided for under the terms of this Agreement are not intended to be exclusive, but shall be cumulative with all other remedies available to the City at law, in equity or by statute. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this Agreement in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. Failure or delay of the City to declare any breach or default immediately upon occurrence shall not waive such breach or default. Failure of the City to declare one breach or default does not act as a waiver of the City's right to declare another breach or default. This Agreement shall be made in, governed by, and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the Parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claim arising from this Agreement, the exclusive means of resolving that dispute, difference, or claim, shall be by filing suit under the venue, rules and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an alternative process. If the King County Superior Court does not have jurisdiction over such a suit, then suit may be filed in any other appropriate court in King County, Washington. Each party consents to the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts in King County, Washington and waives any objection that such courts are an inconvenient forum. If either Party brings any claim or lawsuit arising from this Agreement, each Party shall pay all its legal costs and attorney's fees and expenses incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, including all appeals, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided, however, however nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the Parties' rights to indemnification under Section 5 of this Agreement. 13.5 Execution. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City and Contractor represents and warrants that such individual is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and with the same effect as if all Parties hereto had signed the same document. All such counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one instrument, but in making proof hereof it shall only be necessary to produce one such counterpart. The signature and acknowledgment pages from such counterparts may be assembled together to form a single instrument comprised of all pages of this Agreement and a complete set of all signature and acknowledgment pages. The date upon which the last of all of the Parties have executed a counterpart of this Agreement shall be the "date of mutual execution" hereof. [Signature page follows] PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - 5 - 9/2012 CITY OF CITY HALL �4S 6. 33325 8th .avenue ,:youth t- deral Wa Federal Way, VIVA 98 003 -6325 (243) 835 -7000 .Y'ri'44': t'l v'O ftE'.Liel��i6V jai?. £:C1e "7i IN WITNESS, the Parties execute this Agreement below, effective the last date written below. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Skip Priest, Mayor DATE M.J. DURKAN, INC By: Printed Name: Title: DATE: STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF ATTEST: City Clerk, Carol McNeilly, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Patricia A Richardson On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the of that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he /she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. GIVEN my hand and official seal this day of 20 Notary's signature Notary's printed name Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - 6 - 9/2012 C3 "CY OF CITY HALL '-ederal Way 33325 8th Avenue SOUth • Pty Box 9718 Federal Way 'vVA 98063 -9718 .:. (253) 835 -7000 EXHIBIT "A" SERVICES The Contractor shall do or provide the following: In consultation with the Mayor and /or staff designee, lobby state and local governments and cultivate relationships with other organizations, potentially including the federal government, as necessary to pursue the City's 2013 legislative objectives, economic development, and governmental relationships as approved by Council. Lobbying is defined as attempting to pass, stop or amend legislation as desired by the City, as well as build a positive legislative presence for the City through face -to -face, written/electronic communications with appropriate persons. Cultivating relationships is defined as outreach and establishment of a rapport with representatives from other organizations, including those at the federal level. Help identify, prioritize and monitor problems and opportunities for the City with respect to issues under consideration by the State Legislature and State and regional agencies, especially those issues defined in the City's Annual Legislative Agenda, help identify and pursue opportunities involving federal assistance and partnerships, and support priority City economic development goals by identifying and reaching out to organizations and representatives with an emphasis in economic and/or business development. Stay in touch with issues at the King County level, with the Suburban Cities Association, the Association of Washington Cities and other applicable organizations. Specific duties include: • Assist in identifying and prioritizing City issues prior to the 2013 Legislative session, including meeting with Department heads and the 30th District Legislators. • Work with Mayor and /or staff designee to prepare the City's 2013 and 2014 Legislative Agenda. • Brief the City Council and the 30th District Delegation on the Legislative Agenda at the January 2013 State Legislative Breakfasts. • Work with Mayor and/or staff designee to prepare an off - session workplan for State Legislative issues and perform subsequent work. • Assist in identifying and prioritizing outreach on regional issues and opportunities. • Assist in identifying and prioritizing outreach on federal issues and opportunities. • Assist in identifying and prioritizing outreach for economic and/or business development in the City. • Attend meetings of the City Council, City Council committees, and with City personnel as reasonably requested. • Complete in a timely and accurate fashion all forms and reports required of lobbyists by the state and other lawful jurisdictions. • Maintain flexibility when working with the City on the myriad of issues. Provide correspondence to the Mayor and /or staff designee for the following: Telephone or e -mail updates on pending issues as they arise. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - 7 - 9/2012 CITY OF CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue Sor.sth • PO Box 971 Federal 'Way, avA 98063 -8718 (253) 835 -70511 A brief weekly written status report during the Legislative Session concerning lobbying efforts and a separate report regarding outreach efforts. A final written report and in- person presentation at the end of the Legislative Session. Off - session projects as they arise. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - 8 - 9/2012 AL CITY OF Clit HA ' 33325 3th revenue South PO Box 9713 ��, Federal 'Ata /, %,VA 96063 -5716 i,253) 3355-7000 '".i11 ,svt}it ?:ft- c ?14Y3j ?CL1?7i EXHIBIT `B" COMPENSATION 1. Total Compensation: In return for the Services, the City shall pay the Contractor an amount not to exceed Sixty -two Thousand and No/ 100 Dollars ($62,000.00), which shall be equally divided in twelve monthly payments. 2. Reimbursable Expenses: The actual and incidental expenses incurred by the Contractor, including but not limited to mileage, copying and other reasonable costs; provided, however, that such costs shall be deemed reasonable in the City's sole discretion and shall not exceed Three thousand and No /100 Dollars ($3,000). PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - 9 - 9/2012 CITY OF CITY NAB=_ 33325 3th Avenue SOLIth - PQ Box 871=: Federal Wa Federal Way, vVA 98083 -5718 a (253) 835-7000 EXHIBIT "C" INSURANCE CERTIFICATE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -10- 9/2012 City Of Federal Way Request for Proposals 2013 State Lobbyist/Public Affairs Representative MJ Durkan Inc. July 27, 2012 Company Information: MJ Durkan, Inc. was established in 1988 in Washington State to provide institutional and governmental clients with political representation on local, state and federal policy issues. Over the past 24 years, MJ Durkan, Inc. has successfully represented multi - national corporations, local businesses and municipal clients on a wide range of issues. MJ Durkan, :Inc. provides its clients the proven capability of developing the correct political strategy to accomplish the required tasks necessary to reach goals as defined by the client. The skill sets provided by MJ Durkan, Inc. include strategic planning, lobbying, public relations, coalition building, and project assessment. Areas of expertise include: • Lobbying • Comprehensive planning • Regulatory interaction • Environmental issues • Capital project funding • Mega project development • Political strategy assessment • Communication Skills • Public Relations MJ Durkan, Inc. Clients (former and current): City of Tukwila, City of Kent, City of Federal Way, Muckleshoot Tribe, Boeing Family Trust, Desimone Family Trust, Paul Allen Companies, Port Blakely Communities, Opus Development, Museum of Flight, KPMG, SMG Corporation, New York Bank of Mellon, People Soft, Galvin Flying Service, US West, Delta Marine, Black Diamond Partners, Segale Business Parks, Education 2020 References: King County Council Member Pete Von Reichbauer, Mayor Jim Haggerton, Senator Ed Murray, Washington State House Speaker Frank Chopp Contract Administrator Federal Way Project: Martin "Jamie " Durkan, managing director MJ Durkan Inc, will have the responsibility to administer and carry out tasks as outlined in the RFP and this proposal. Mr. Durkan is a graduate of Seattle University in Political Science and History and has been active in northwest politics for 35 years. He has worked on a variety of major economic development projects on behalf of both public and private interests. These projects have created jobs, housing and tax revenue. Mr.Durkan has excellent working relationships with current Washington State and federally elected officials from both political parties. His role will be to work with city of Federal Way officials to help develop a political strategy to implement the goals as outlined by the city's 2013 legislative agenda. Mr. Durkan will actively lobby on behalf of the city on designated issues and work with other organizations to build coalitions that will support the city's legislative positions. He will work directly with state, local and federal officials to effectively communicate the city's legislative agenda. M J Durkan, Inc. may hire additional contract lobbying support staff to work on issues with him during the legislative session. There are no additional costs to the city associated with such a specialist lobbyist. This strategy can give clients projects the edge at critical times. Mr. Durkan will advise the city should additional contract lobbyist work be necessary prior to work being preformed. Tasks, Objectives and Products Included in MJ Durkan Proposal: • Work with mayor, council and department heads to develop 2013 -2014 legislative agenda. • Develop political strategy to successfully accomplish the city's legislative agenda. • Partner with regional, local and federal elected officials to strengthen Federal Way's political positions. • Lobby to gain state and federal capital dollars for various infrastructure projects in the city which will help attract major employment providers resulting in increased city revenues. • Work to build coalitions and develop relationships with business and community groups to strengthen the city's political base for successful legislative efforts. • Effectively lobby the Washington state legislature on behalf of the city before and during the 2013 legislative session. • Reach out to elected officials in King County, Pierce County, Sound Transit, PSRC, AWC, and SCA, as requested by the Mayor's office. • Attend city council meetings and legislative strategy briefings as requested by the Mayor's office. • Provide briefings in person, via email and telephone conferencing to mayor and designated department heads on a regular basis. • Provide written reports to mayor and council summarizing activities and accomplishments at the conclusion of 2013 legislative session. Project Schedule: October 2012 through January 2013 Work with city officials to develop 2013 the legislative agenda and political strategy to implement goals and objectives identified in RFP and MJD legislative objectives /tasks. Meet with state legislative leaders to begin ground work on Federal Way legislative issues for 2013 session. + The projected time allocation for this period is 5 -8 hours per week. January 2013 through May 2013 Work on behalf of the city lobbing members of the state legislature to accomplish goals outlined in the cities 2013 legislative agenda. Attend hearings, schedule appointments, prepare reports, continue outreach and update political strategy. • The projected time allocation for this period is 8 -16 hours per week. June 2013 through September 2013 Continue political work with state and regional elected officials on behalf of the city to implement accomplished goals of 2013 legislative agenda. Attend regional and legislative hearings as requested by the mayor's office. Refine the 2013 -2014 legislative agenda to reflect geopolitical changes in state and national economy. Continue outreach to interest groups to strengthen the city's political base. Work with city officials to attract major economic development to Federal Way urban employment center. • The projected time allocation for this period is 5 -8 hours per week. Budget: The budget amount for completion of all outlined tasks and objectives performed by MJ Durkan, Inc. in response to the RFP includes all in -state travel and normal business expenses. Fees for attendance at AWC or SCA legislative conferences and out -of- state travel to be paid by the city. Costs for economic development consulting and comprehensive planning are included in the monthly retainer. The retainer can be reduced by $500.00 per month should the city not require MJD to focus on this area. Costs for outreach to federal elected officials and special interest groups are included in the monthly retainer. The retainer can be reduced by $500.00 per month should the city not require MJD to focus on this area. Special project services such as accompanying the mayor to Washington DC or attending meetings deemed important by the Mayor's office are included in this proposal at no additional cost. Total cost for Lobbying /Political consulting services for state and local legislative authorities, economic development and outreach is $6000.00 per month. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 4th, 2012 ITEM #:_ ......... ......... ........ ......... __. ........... .......... _..._.... ..... ...... ......... ............... ........... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: USE OF EXCESS REPLACEMENT RESERVE FUNDS TO REPLACE THE CURRENT 1992 SHUTTLE BUS POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council authorize the use of Excess Replacement Reserve funds of $60,000 to replace the current 1992 shuttle bus? COMMITTEE: FEDRAC MEETING DATE August 28, 2012 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: David Schmidt & Kevin Hutchinson, Recreation DEPT: PRCS Coordinators Attachments: Memo State bid from EK Coaches Options Considered: 1. Authorize the use of $60,000 from Excess Replacement Reserve funds to replace the current 1992 shuttle bus. 2. Do not authorize the use of $60,000 from Excess Replacement Reserve funds to replace the current 1992 shuttle bus, and provide direction to staff. .. ... ......................................................................................... ...................................................._..........................................................._..................................................................................................................................................... -._................_....._._................ .......... ......... ._._........ - .._..._......... MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Option #1: Authorize the use of $60,000 from the Excess Replacement Reserve funds to replace the current 1992 shuttle bus. MAYOR APPROVAL: :Z_ DIRECTOR APPROVAL: ommi a Co it Committee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the approval to authorize the use of $60,000 from Excess Replacement Reserve funds to replace the 1992 shuttle bus to the September 4, 2012 consent agenda for approval. Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval to authorize to spend $60, 000 from Excess Replacement Reserve funds to replace the current shuttle bus. (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED 1ST reading • TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading • MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED — 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION # ` CITY OF '�._. Federal Way Recreation & Cultural Services Division Date: August 281h, 2012 To: FEDRAC From: David Schmidt & Kevin Hutchinson, Recreation Coordinators Via: Mayor Skip Priest Cary M. Roe, P.E., Director of Parks, Public Works & Emergency Mgmt. Subject: Use of $60,000 Excess Replacement Reserve funds to replace the 1992 shuttle bus with the purchase of a new wheelchair accessible shuttle bus. Our current shuttle bus is over 20 years old and no longer meets the needs of our recreation programs due to frequent mechanical issues. The shuttle bus has a history of breaking down on recreation outings and has become undependable. The Recreation & Cultural. Services Division has been limited in the growth of many programs because of these issues. Both Inclusive Recreation and Senior program participants require a dependable and accessible vehicle because of their physical limitations. In 1992, the City of Federal Way acquired a 14- passenger shuttle bus to meet the many needs of our growing recreation programs. The shuttle bus has been used frequently over the past 20 years to provide transportation for Senior, Inclusive and many other recreation programs. Unfortunately, this shuttle bus is not under the city vehicle replacement program, as a result replacement funds have not been collected to replace the shuttle bus. A new shuttle bus would provide a comfortable and dependable mode of transportation and allow the growth of our recreation programs. We are proposing to purchase a new, 2012, 18- passenger wheelchair accessible shuttle bus. Attached is a state bid from EK Coaches. The new shuttle bus would be purchased through the use of $60,000 Excess Replacement Reserve funds. QUOTATION FOR FEDERAL WAY 2012 GOSHEN GCII (16) PASSENGERS + (2) WHEELCHAIR LOCATIONS (18) PASSENGERS + (1) WHEELCHAIR LOCATION AUGUST 21, 2012 INCLUDES ALL STANDARD EQUIPMENT• 2012 GOSHEN COACH GCII, 25' FORD E -450 CUTAWAY CHASSIS 186" WHEEL BASE, 14,500 GVWR 6.8L V -10 GASOLINE ENGINE 5 -SPEED AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION DRIVER'S AIRBAG AUXILIARY TRANSMISSION OIL COOLER POWER STEERING, TILT AND CRUISE CONTROL SELF - ADJUSTING DISC BRAKES, ABS DASH HEATER, AIR CONDITIONING, AND DEFROST 225 AMP ALTERNATOR DUAL HEAVY DUTY BATTERIES 1250 CCA DUAL ENTRY STEPWELL LIGHTS, WHITE ENTRY STEP NOSING MUD FLAPS FRONT AND REAR FLUSH MOUNT INTERIOR DOME LIGHTS (4) 55 GALLON FUEL CAPACITY HEAVY DUTY SUSPENSION - H D SPRINGS AND SHOCKS FRONT STABILIZER BAR 1" DIAMETER (6) LT225 / 75R X 16D, ALL SEASON RADIAL TIRES FULL STEEL CAGE CONSTRUCTION, FRP EXTERIOR SIDE WALLS FLOORING, 5/8" PLYWOOD, UNDERCOATED ALUMINUM HEAT SHIELD OVER CHASSIS DRIVE SHAFT GUARD DELUXE CONVEX MIRRORS AUXILIARY HEATER WITH SHUT OFF VALVE THOROUGH UNDERCOATING - PENZ GUARD III SAFETY STANCHIONS AND MODESTY PANEL - LEFT OF ENTRY MEETS OR EXCEEDS ALL FMVSS REQUIREMENTS ALTOONA TESTED, FORD QVM COMPLIANCE 3 YEAR 36,000 MILE BUMPER -TO- BUMPER CHASSIS WARRANTY 5 YEAR, 60,000 MILE FORD POWERTRAIN WARRANTY 6 YEARS, 60,000 MILE BODY CONSTRUCTION WARRANTY INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS: 32" ELECTRIC ENTRY DOOR REAR EMERGNCY DOOR WITH WINDOWS 36 "x 36" TOP -T- SLIDER WINDOWS, 31% TINT DELUXE CONVEX MIRRORS 6" x 9" INTERIOR VIEW MIRROR ADDITIONAL ENTRY HANDRAIL, PARALLEL TO STEPS LIGHT GRAY FRP INTERIOR PANELS (16) MID BACK BUCKET SEATS, NON - RECLINING (1) 34" FREEDMAN 3 -STEP FOLDING SEATS, 2 PASSENGERS NON RECTRACTABLE SEAT BELTS, 60' AISLE SIDE FOLDING ARMREST PADDED GRAB HANDLES ON SEAT BACKS PILLOWED SEAT CUSHIONS SEAT COVERS LEVEL 1, GRAY CLOTH HIGH BACK RECLINING DRIVER SEAT, W/ ARMREST AND LUMBAR SINGLE WHEELCHAIR DOOR W/ WINDOW HEAVY DUTY SHOCKS ON WHEELCHAIR DOOR, BEHIND AXLE CURB SIDE ADA LIFT LIGHTS ADA BRAKE AND TRANSMISSION INTERLOCK ADA FULLY AUTOMATIC WHEELCHAIR LIFT, BRAUN CENTRY 403/404 COMPLIANT (2) ADA Q- STRAINT "RETRAKTOR" L TRACK FLUSH MOUNT WHEELCHAIR TIEDOWN W/ SHOULDER STRAP 60,000 BTU REAR AIR CONDITIONING TIE IN TO FORD COMPRESSOR 65,000 BTU REAR HEATER FIRST AID KIT FIRE EXTINGUISHER TRIANGLE REFLECTOR KIT REVERSE ALARM AM/FM W/ (4)- SPEAKERS BLACK FLOOR RUBBER W/ RIBBED AISLE WHITE STEP NOSING UNDERCOATING WHITE BASE BODY DELIVERED TO FEDERAL WAY UNIT PRICE_ $60,000.00 *Price DOES include sales tax and license fees *Price includes all Ford Factory Rebates (Must be able to get GPC and Mobility. City of Federal Way DOES have a Ford GPC # and any bus with a lift will get Mobility) *Please allow 90 -120 days for delivery OPTIONS TO CONSIDER NOT IN PRICE ABOVE MOR/RYDE SUSPENSION $1,700.00 STAINLESS STEEL WHEELS INSERTS $450.00 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 4, 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL ITEM #: SUBJECT: Selection Process – 2012 Amendments to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) POLICY QUESTION: Which of the citizen - initiated site - specific requests for comprehensive plan amendments should City of Federal Way staff research further? COMMITTEE: Land Use /Transportation Committee (LUTC) MEETING DATE: July 2 and August 6, 2012 CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ® Public Hearing n Citv Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Principal Planner Margaret Clark and Planning DEPT: Community & Economic Development Manager Isaac Conlen Attachments: June 25, 2012, Staff Report to the LUTC with Exhibits A – G and July 31, 2012, Staff Report to the LUTC with Exhibits A – B. Background: The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) requires the city to accept applications for amendments to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) on an annual basis. The city received the following three citizen - initiated requests for site - specific comprehensive plan amendments in September 2012: 1) request from Edward Hoit for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.82 acres (parcel #112103 -9131) located to the west of Dumas Bay Park from Single Family – Low Density Residential and Suburban Estates (SE, one unit per five acres) to Single Family – Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet); 2) request from Mark Barrett for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 0.35 acres (parcel #785360 -0008) located at 1836 South 308I' Street from Single Family – High Density Residential and RS 7.2 (Single Family, one unit per 7,200 square feet) to Multiple Family Residential and RM 3600 (Multi - Family, one unit per 3,600 square feet); and 3) request from Isaac Hildebrandt for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.18 acres (parcel #292104 -9071) located at 1320 South 359d' Street from Single Family – Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet) to Single Family – High Density Residential and RS 5.0 (Single Family, one unit per 5,000 square feet) or alternatively RS 7.2 (one unit per 7,200 square feet). Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080, after the deadline for accepting applications and following an LUTC recommendation, the City Council shall hold a public hearing and select those docketed amendment requests it wishes to move to the Planning Commission for further consideration. Options Considered: 1) Concur with the Mayor's recommendation; 2) Do not concur with the Moor's recommendation._ . .__.._ ...............— _.__.........._.... ..._........................... MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: That Site - Specific Requests #1 and #2 be considered further because they meet the selection criteria and that Site - Specific Request #3 not be considered further because it is not consistent with the FWCP. MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: Committee Co cil Committee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the Mayor's recommendation on Site Specific Requests 0, #2 (including the parcel to the east), and 93 to the September 4, 2012, City Council meeting for a public hearing. See attached Agenda Bills for the July 2 and August 6, 2012, LUTC Meetings Bob Celski, Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the Mayor's recommendation. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: • APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # • DENIED 1sT reading • TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED- 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION # K: \Comprehensive Plan\2012 Comprehensive Plan\Selection ProceSS\LUTC\Final 090412 Agenda Bill.doc COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 4, 2012 ITEM #: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Selection Process — 2012 Amendments to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) POLICY QUESTION: Which of the citizen - initiated site- specific requests for comprehensive plan amendments should City of Federal Way staff research further? COMMITTEE: Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012 CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ® Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Principal Planner Margaret Clark DEPT: Community & Economic Development Attachments: June 25, 2012, Staff Report to the LUTC with Exhibits A —G. Background: The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) requires the city to accept applications for amendments to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) on an annual basis. The city received the following three citizen - initiated requests for site - specific c comprehensive plan amendments in September 2012: 1) request from Edward Hoit for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.82 acres (parcel #112103 -9131) located to the west of Dumas Bay Park from Single Family Low Density Residential and Suburban Estates (SE, one unit per five acres) to Single Family — Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet); 2) request from Mark Barrett for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 0.35 acres (parcel #785360 -0008) located at 1836 South 3081h Street from Single Family — High Density Residential and RS 7.2 (Single Family, one unit per 7,200 square feet) to Multiple Family Residential and RM 3600 (Multi- Family, one unit per 3,600 square feet); and 3) request from Isaac Hildebrandt for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.18 acres (parcel #2921049071) located at 1320 South 359` Street from Single Family — Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet) to Multiple Family Residential and RM 2400 (Multi- Family, one unit per 2,400 square feet). Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080, after the deadline for accepting applications and following an LUTC recommendation, the City Council shall hold a public hearing and select those docketed amendment requests it wishes to move to the Planning Commission for further consideration. Options Considered: 1) Concur with the Mayor's recommendation; 2) Do not concur with the Mayor's recommendation. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: That Site - Specific Requests #1 and 3 not be considered further because they are not consistent with the comprehensive plan. That Site - Specific Request #2 goes forward for further consideration. Z221_ MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: Committed Council auac�l COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the Mayor's recommendation on Site Specific Request #2 (including the parcel to the east) to the September 4, 2012, City Council meeting for a public hearing and table Site Specific Requests #1 and 3 to the August 6, 2012 LUTC meeting for consideration. Please refer to Pages 7 of 8 and 8 of 8 for signatures Bob Celski, Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the Mayor's recommendation. REVISED - 08/12/1010 RESOLUTION # K: \Comprehensive Plan\2012 Comprehensive Plan \Selection Process \LUTC \Agenda Bill.doc (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED 1ST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED - 08/12/1010 RESOLUTION # K: \Comprehensive Plan\2012 Comprehensive Plan \Selection Process \LUTC \Agenda Bill.doc 41k CITY OF Federal Way DATE: June 25, 2012 TO: Bob Celski, Chair Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) FROM: Patrick Doherty, Director of Community and Economic Development Margaret H. Clark, Principal Planner SUBJECT: Selection Process — 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012 I. POLICY QUESTION Which of the citizen - initiated site - specific requests for comprehensive plan amendments should City of Federal Way staff research further? H. BACKGROUND The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) requires the city to accept applications for amendments to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) text and map on an annual basis. The city received three requests in September 2011. Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080, after the September 30s' deadline for accepting applications and following an LUTC recommendation, the City Council shall hold a public hearing and select those docketed amendment requests it wishes to move to the Planning Commission for fiuther consideration. M. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS Changes and updates to the comprehensive plan are divided into text changes to chapters of the comprehensive plan and requests for changes to comprehensive plan designations and zoning for specific parcels, which would result in changes to the Comprehensive Plan Map and Official Zoning Map. Following is a summary of the three citizen - initiated comprehensive plan amendments received in September 2011 (2012 Comprehensive Plan Update). 2012 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS (Exhibit A — Composite Map) (i) File No. 11- 103859 -UP —Request from Edward Hoit for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.82 acres (parcel #112103 -9131) located to the west of Dumas Bay Park from Single Family — Low Density Residential and Suburban Estates (SE, one unit per five acres) Land Use(Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012 Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page I of 8 to Single Family — Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet) (Exhibit B — Vicinity Map). (ii) File No. 11- 103895 -UP — Request from Mark Barrett for a comprehensive Elan amendment and rezone of 0.35 acres (parcel #785360 -0008) located at 1836 South 308 Street from Single Family — High Density Residential and RS 7.2 (Single Family, one unit per 7,200 square feet) to Multiple Family Residential and RM 3600 (Multi - Family, one unit per 3,600 square feet) (Exhibit C — Vicinity Map). (iii) File No. 11- 103962 -UP — Request from Isaac Hildebrandt for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.18 acres (parcel #2921049071) located at 1320 South 359" Street from Single Family — Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet) to Multiple Family Residential and RM 2400 (Multi - Family, one unit per 2,400 square feet) (Exhibit D — Vicinity Map). IV. REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION Pursuant to FWRC 19.08.050, Process VI, "Council Rezones," the City Council is required to review all requests concurrently. The first step in the process is a public hearing by the council, at which time the council selects those amendment requests it wishes staff to research further. V. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT SELECTION PROCESS July 2, 2012 LUTC Meeting — A summary of all requests will be presented to the LUTC for a recommendation on which requests should be considered further. July 17 2012 City Council Public Hearing — The City Council shall determine which requests should be considered further. VI. BACKGROUND AND STAFF ANALYSIS — SITE - SPECIFIC REQUESTS A composite map showing the location of the site - specific requests to be presented for selection is attached as Exhibit A. A. Site - Specific Request #1— Hoit 1. Summary File Number: 11- 103859 -UP Parcel No.: 112103 -9131 Address: None Location: East of SW 308' St/43'd Ave SW and west of Dumas Bay Park Size: 1.82 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Applicant/Owner: Edward Hoit Existing Comprehensive Plan: Single Family — Low Density Residential Existing Zoning: Suburban Estates (SE, one unit per five acres) Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012 Selection Process - Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 2 of 8 Requested Comprehensive Plan: Requested Zoning: 2. Reason for the Request Single Family — Medium Density Residential RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet) The land is presently vacant and has both a Class I Wetland and a Major Stream on -site. The combination of the 200 -foot wide wetland buffer and the 100 -foot stream buffer leaves very little if any buildable land. In addition, the parcel does not have direct access to the adjacent right -of -way to the west. The owner, Mr. Hoit, has owned the parcel for over 25 years and is requesting the rezone to make it consistent with the RS 15.0 zoning to the west, thereby making it a more marketable parcel. 3. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use (Exhibit E — Aerial Map) B. Site - Specific Request #2 — Barrett 1. Summary File Number: Parcel No.: Address: Location: Size: Applicant/Owner: Existing Comprehensive Plan: Existing Zoning: Requested Comprehensive Plan: Requested Zoning: 2. Reason for the Request 11- 103895 -UP 785360 -0008 1836 South 308'' Street South of South 308'' Street and west of 19'h Avenue South 0.35 acres Mark Barrett Single Family — High Density Residential RS 7.2 (Single Family, one unit per 7,200 square feet) Multiple Family Residential RM 3600 (Multi - Family, one unit per 3,600 square feet) There is a single family house on the site. There are duplexes to the west, south, and southeast across 19'' Avenue South. The applicant is requesting Multi- Family zoning in order to build duplexes, which would be consistent with the adjacent uses. 3. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use (Exhibit F— Aerial Map) Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012 Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 3 of 8 Zoning Land Use North Suburban Estates (SE, one unit Single - Family Residential per five acres) South Suburban Estates (SE, one unit City Park per five acres) East Suburban Estates (SE, one unit City Park per five acres) West RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit Single - Family Residential per 15,000 square feet) B. Site - Specific Request #2 — Barrett 1. Summary File Number: Parcel No.: Address: Location: Size: Applicant/Owner: Existing Comprehensive Plan: Existing Zoning: Requested Comprehensive Plan: Requested Zoning: 2. Reason for the Request 11- 103895 -UP 785360 -0008 1836 South 308'' Street South of South 308'' Street and west of 19'h Avenue South 0.35 acres Mark Barrett Single Family — High Density Residential RS 7.2 (Single Family, one unit per 7,200 square feet) Multiple Family Residential RM 3600 (Multi - Family, one unit per 3,600 square feet) There is a single family house on the site. There are duplexes to the west, south, and southeast across 19'' Avenue South. The applicant is requesting Multi- Family zoning in order to build duplexes, which would be consistent with the adjacent uses. 3. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use (Exhibit F— Aerial Map) Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012 Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 3 of 8 C. Site - Specific Request #3 — Hildebrandt 1. Summary File Number: Parcel No.: Address: Location: Size: Applicant: Agent: Owners: Existing Comprehensive Plan: Existing Zoning: Requested Comprehensive Plan: Requested Zoning: 2. Reason for the Request 11- 103962 -UP 292104 -9071 1320 South 359th Street North of South 359th Street and west of 16th Avenue South 1.18 acres Eric Hildebrandt Isaac Hildebrandt Eric Hildebrandt and Jesse Cherian Single Family — Medium Density Residential RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet) Multiple Family Residential RM 2400 (Multi - Family, one unit per 2,400 square feet) There is a single family home on this parcel. Land uses to the east, west, and south are single - family residential. The applicants own the two parcels to the north of the subject property, which are 16.63 acres in size. They would like to build a multi - family complex on the northern parcels and use the subject parcel for additional access and as a utility easement. 3. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use (Exhibit — Aerial Map) G Zoning Land Use North RS 7.2 (Single Family, one Church and Single - Family Residential unit per 7,200 square feet) South RS 7.2 (Single Family, one Duplexes unit per 7,200 square feet) East RS 7.2 (Single Family, one unit per 7,200 square feet) Single - Family Residential and Duplexes West RM 1800 (Multi - family, one Duplex unit per 1,800 square feet) C. Site - Specific Request #3 — Hildebrandt 1. Summary File Number: Parcel No.: Address: Location: Size: Applicant: Agent: Owners: Existing Comprehensive Plan: Existing Zoning: Requested Comprehensive Plan: Requested Zoning: 2. Reason for the Request 11- 103962 -UP 292104 -9071 1320 South 359th Street North of South 359th Street and west of 16th Avenue South 1.18 acres Eric Hildebrandt Isaac Hildebrandt Eric Hildebrandt and Jesse Cherian Single Family — Medium Density Residential RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet) Multiple Family Residential RM 2400 (Multi - Family, one unit per 2,400 square feet) There is a single family home on this parcel. Land uses to the east, west, and south are single - family residential. The applicants own the two parcels to the north of the subject property, which are 16.63 acres in size. They would like to build a multi - family complex on the northern parcels and use the subject parcel for additional access and as a utility easement. 3. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use (Exhibit — Aerial Map) G Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012 Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 4 of 8 Zoning Land Use North RM 2400 (Multi- Family, one Vacant and Manufacturing Plant unit per 2,400 square feet) South RS 15.0 (Single Family, one Single- Family Residential unit per 15,000 square feet) East RS 15.0 (Single Family, one Single - Family Residential unit per 15,000 square feet) Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012 Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 4 of 8 West RS 15.0 (Single Family, one Single- Family Residential unit per 15,000 square feet) VII. SELECTION CRITERIA FWRC 19.80.080 contains criteria for selecting amendments for further consideration. A. Criterion #1— Whether the same area or issue was studied during the last amendment process and conditions in the immediate vicinity have significantly changed so as to make the requested change within the public interest. Response to Criterion #1— Request Response Site Specific Request #1— This issue was not studied during the last amendment process, or Hoit during any previous amendment cycle. Site Specific Request # 2 — This issue was not studied during the last amendment process, or Barrett during any previous amendment cycle. Site Specific Request # 3 — This issue was not studied during the last amendment process. The Hildebrandt two parcels to the north, which are also owned by the applicants, were rezoned from Commercial Enterprise (CE) to Multi- Family (RM 2400) as part of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process. B. Criterion #2 — The proposed amendment is consistent with the overall vision of the comprehensive plan. Response to Criterion #2 — Request Response Site Specific Request #1— Changing the designation of this parcel from Suburban Estates Hoit (SE) to Single Family — High Density Residential (RS 15.0) would not be consistent with the overall vision of the comprehensive plan. The existing SE designation for the subject parcel is consistent with the vision of the comprehensive plan to retain larger urban lots on or near critical areas in order to avoid development pressure. The comprehensive plan states that there are two notable locations that meet this criterion: Spring Valley, located in the southern portion of the city; and along Puget Sound near Dumas Bay in the vicinity of Camp Uworth and the Palisades Retreat property. This property is west of and abuts Dumas Bay Park. Site Specific Request # 2 — Designating this parcel as multi- family is consistent with Land Use Barrett Policy LUP23, which is supportive of locating multiple - family development where transportation and capital facilities improvements are available. All utilities are available to the site. In addition, the parcel is adjacent to South 308th Street, a minor collector, which is intended to connect higher density areas to the arterial system. The proposed amendment would also allow development of the site to be consistent with adjacent land uses. Land UsaTransportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012 Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments I Page 5 of 8 Request Response Site Specific Request # 3 — This request is not consistent with the comprehensive plan policy Hildebrandt to preserve and protect Federal Way's single - family neighborhoods (LUG3). C. Criterion #3 — Whether the proposed amendment meets the existing state and local laws, including the GMA. Response to Criterion #3 — None of the proposed amendments, if adopted, would be in conflict with local or state laws if subsequent development of the parcels are in compliance with local and state regulations, including the FWRC and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). D. Criterion #4 — In the case of text amendments, or other amendments to goals or policies, whether the request benefits the city as a whole versus a selected group. Response to Criterion #4 — Not applicable. The requests are site - specific requests and not requests for text amendments. If the request meets the criteria set forth in subsections above, it shall be further evaluated according to the following criteria: E. Criterion #1— Whether the proposed amendment can be incorporated into planned or active projects. Response to Criterion #1— If the City Council determines that these requests should be analyzed further, they can be incorporated into the 2012 Planning Commission Work Program. F. Criterion #2 — Amount of analysis necessary to reach a recommendation on the request. If a large -scale study is required, a request may have to be delayed until the following year due to workload, staffing levels, etc. Response to Criterion #2 — None of the requests require a large -scale study. G. Criterion #3 — Volume of requests received. A large volume of requests may necessitate that some requests be reviewed in a subsequent year. Response to Criterion #3 — Only three requests were received for the 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Cycle. H. Criterion #4 — Order of requests received. Response to Criterion #4 — The requests were received in the following order. 1. Hoit 2. Barrett 3. Hildebrandt Land UseJTransportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012 Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 6 of 8 VIII. COUNCIL ACTION Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080(4), based on its review of requests according to the criteria in Section VII of this staff report, the City Council shall determine which requests shall be further considered for adoption and shall forward those requests to the Planning Commission for its review and recommendation. The council's decision whether to consider a proposed amendment shall not constitute a decision or recommendation that the proposed amendment should be adopted, nor does it preclude later council action to add an amendment for consideration. IX. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION A. Site - Specific Request #1— Request from Edward Hoit for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.82 acres (parcel #112103 -9131) located to the west of Dumas Bay Park from Single Family — Low Density Residential and Suburban Estates (SE, one unit per five acres) to Single Family — Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet). Mayor's Recommendation —The Mayor recommends that the request not go forward for further review because it does not conform to the comprehensive plan. B. Site - Specific Request #2 — Request from Mark Barrett for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 0.35 acres (parcel #785360 -0008) located at 1836 South 3086' Street from Single Family — High Density Residential and RS 7.2 (Single Family, one unit per 7,200 square feet) to Multiple Family Residential and RM 3600 (Multi - Family, one unit per 3,600 square feet). Mayor's Recommendation — The Mayor recommends that the LUTC forward the proposed amendment request for consideration by the Planning Commission, LUTC, and City Council. C. Site- Specific Request #3 — Request from Isaac Hildebrandt for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.18 acres (parcel #292104 -9071) located at 1320 South 3596i Street from Single Family — Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet) to Multiple Family Residential and RM 2400 (Multi - Family, one unit per 2,400 square feet). Mayor's Recommendation —The Mayor recommends that the request not go forward for further review because it does not conform to the comprehensive plan. X. LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The LUTC forwards the recommendation to the full Council as follows: 1. Hoit Request a) That the request go forward for further consideration. b) That the request not go forward for further consideration. C) lh� re ues+ 1 -6 4tt_aect IT -K re..ALi� &i ;2-b I .z- "twc, t me-e_k t5 Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012 Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 7 of 8 APP VAL OF C 1(, TEE REPORT: Bob Celski, Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member usan Honda, Member 2. Barrett Request a) That the request go forward for further consideration. a-VL 4 t nC l ttd e, -H-7e e b) That the request not go forward for further consideration. AL OF C PORT: 136b Ce ski Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member 3. Hildebrandt Request a) That the request go forward for further consideration. b) That the request not go forward for further consideration. C) x -fl1e�i\,Iej e54 is +a blat 10 +Etc- AWj &, '2t12"cTc mec 7F C M ITTEE REPORT: iki Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Siisan Honda, Member XI. LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Composite Map Exhibit B Vicinity Map of Site - Specific Request #1 — Hoit Exhibit C Vicinity Map of Site - Specific Request #2 — Barrett Exhibit D Vicinity Map of Site - Specific Request #3 — Hildebrandt Exhibit E Aerial Photo of Site - Specific Request #1 — Hoit Exhibit F Aerial Photo of Site - Specific Request #2 — Barrett Exhibit G Aerial Photo of Site - Specific Request #3 — Hildebrandt K: \Comprehensive Plan\20t2 Comprehensive Plan \Selection Process \LUTC \Staff Report to the LUTC.doc Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012 Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 8 of 8 kk 1 __ . .��0 P`'�,Q .J•._. _ _ � O NO�rySHORE PK`�'�y x 0 � � v N� �S_272nd_ST � J'(ar �.Jh: rt�_��� � Sn:�n,l �� � O� � � r--' � f>''� '-•;� > �•�" Q S 288th ST N � _ _..__) � J 5� i U � U a ' .�� a� ; ��QO � ,�, � �;, . �� «,, u� �� Q , .,.,, y`r � ,�.., ,'�W� Q '" S 312th ST ;y a' � N' � il l'l't �I' : ti ; .�n. 2 SW 320th ST S 320th ST y-- ...._ ...�.... W Q N a � :��0/'(%t , N Lukr SW 336th ST 3 N j Q a , , ' N �; �\' ,., �-, ,�,, , :._.._. ` , SW 356th ST . _._.._.�.'- ',• ,` .\ \ f.\�, ,,\ `__.., : ,. �'��` �. . � ��� \ J`�4.`���': I . �:�` t`\; . .1 ,� .` • _ M ; �� � �'` S�R�1. , \��r� \, � `'� � �^ �`, \ . O ' ,\ �; \y � . U � U a S 336th ST S 348th ST N > a � h nu �� Q ``\� ��/'�y Q� ` v �'i .' ��--� � � %'.'�, ,.... _. i � ��'' :-l._...i . .. 5 1� 1,y � , _�i ' _ ' N � �� ll�� _ ��l�t' GD �.t/�L' �y�,�, N � Z� �O . � �s�, NWIY 1I ie N O� r.,�� r� � �.vi�'t,� � = � liuui - _-I .',;/„ _ . _ __._.___ ___ _,_ I City of Federai Way 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Composite Map Exhibit A Site Specific Requests Legend Request Sites Federal Way City Limits Request Key 1. - Hoit 2. - Barrett 3. - Hildebrandt � N 0 0.5 1 Mile This map is accompanied by no warranties, and is simply a graphic representation. RS7.2 i � B� ��� �.V/II�!/�►IGI/JIVt Zoninp: Multi F� . � � ■ �: . (/� ----1- - � Goodwill U B U a S 310TH ST� > a � � `��� � " - ��! � Y'r�«.. _,��,i �����ia„a , � � n�:l���-... St�� Lake Presbyterian � Church � S 308TH ST H R$ 2 Q 7863600008 = t- 0 N 7.2 S 310TH ST Q RS7.2 — _ � N RS7.2 R 7. RM180D S 308TH ST N '< 0 2 N N < ,.r_,,. !, � City of Federal Way �u�,,.y :�, 2012 Site Specific Requests for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designation Changes Barrett Site Specific Request #2 , Exhibit G Legend Site Specific Request Wetlands (1998 City Survey) � Zoning Boundary' Buildings Streets Note: An asterix (*) next to a zoning designation indicates the property is — governed by a development agreement. ' � 0 250 500 N Feet �CITY OF Federal Way This map is accompanied by no warranties, and is simply a graphic representation. % CE RM2400 RS 1 �.0 $ RS 15.0 R�15. 2921049071 Todd Beamer High School N CE S 356TH ST CE Baptist Church RS 15.0 RS35.0 = RM2400 F- �o '- S 359TH ST 15. City of Federal Way 2012 Site Specific Requests for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designation Changes Hildebrandt Site Specific Request #3 Exhibit � Legend Site Specific Request Wetlands (1998 City Survey) � Zoning Boundary* Buildings Streets Note: An asterix (') next to a zoning designation indicates the property is governed by a development agreement. h a x r- � wutt.,n� � k�UUy III ������ ,,.. «��, ,� ' N 0 250 500 Feet CITY OF � Federal Way This map is accompanied by no warranties, and is simply a graphic representation. City of Federal Way 2012 Site Specific Requests for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designation Changes -� ;..: �.� � , .. r �. ��� ������,�t���� �r�� �� `'_�c��# �:� �:��;:,. �"� Hoit .� f' `^�`'� ""���� .._'� �G .. . .r, .. ��,!�' �' ,n; �" . ���" � �� � �'t�" ' - �' � � ��r f- � Site S ecific Re/�yJ uest #1 ���I i� � Y��A + �+ � A�^.#cS � P, � -! �b � ' . ' � 1 � � �' .. � T"'" ., ` ���� , �� :� � { 4 i19�� �°. � �.��, , �-. �.����� � y��� � Exhibit E . , , ._ ,�. � . ; ; � ; .. Palisades � �r� �� � �Retreat y`` "' ��` � �" � �R ., , � � .— Center �, �. � h ' , (� Fp'.' ��� fi ,�. b ���9� �iry�i. �O f ,;{'• . '"�� ,.' i � �, ..� � � •�n, ,; �: �. . +'� Fs F� �^ , ,� c ; 'S'4.'tM1 ,. , �� � ta'.,..�'j,+�A' 31��+ eJ� '� . �y j+' � ' !�•,J . . ,e.. � �# ti�l��:�i�'4i' �i� • ��� �... ',r?' �� i ��. . ._. ��.Ts � z � �� : � � .> >� ;�e � �e x.��;St,�;, � r''�'`:'� � ��"`�°� ': ; � - `� � , Le end '�, x� �� �- �-� � (¢'�3✓ .� »T � •�` ����,� �;;,; � � 1 � '�,. �` � �` �f�,..;�.�:' 9 ��� ',i�,. �}� � � r �YM ,6; :. i� ' 'r.�.'.:�Ya�-.c� ►. ` - \' \�\ � "� l T � �,•t�"'I�" � j �� .' 1 � �1i: ,�a ; k � sha �.7 . �i ;��i,. a '. � � d i a.. . �,� Y ' * t � �'. • F � �'^?. S��y11�1039131+.�,�, ��� !�'��,\� f � E� �, ! '�� � �-� Y= Site Specific Request �� 'g'��� �' � ��Aw.'. ' ; ,..Mui�� r�f K . � \�\`\i�`\. �r ��iiai���:� . , a. . � < Y �i ^• �.� »" 4' t.:ex ��' ` ,�w �„ � }� , i . ; _ 6. _ treams (City Survey Ip ' ' `�` j'+ S ) 7:. �•�+>',, �T�f ,�` i '����arc . 'i � � � ��� �,.a r ':�� � �`\� �� q' y �.w � �. Si�'�i���� ' � '`� t � " � '' S1�$n - � = � � " �- ,� ` �� , � ♦'•� «� '� 3� Wetlands 1998 Cit Surve '�+i �� A�i" * � � ' �, .�.�S�r { r ����yj^!'S ��, �✓ .. "�} .\\\ . � � "' .ru : ��' '� � � y y� �. f*.� � � n c... i�F�ty^ ✓ 1 t� x��. f-N�� y�3 -, ���.�-\\��. `• � ;�t y�` 1E.s .a .� 10 �- �l � �.�.,s ��:' ; � l���.,r s ti t� ♦. .. s .%��` � f aR. �v . �`�;t� x � � �. , :�< � �,. �. ,� �'�` ti .� � ;;��� ti' . , . ; .� � Zoning Boundary , , . ,� : �`�, . � ��p ,� ,. W l,q,v+�' -a� • � t �� t � �.Y y � � ` ,. • ; \� \ ,� � . �� y �. , 'R h -��j_ tic ,�i� i i � {'. �. � � � , 1 � . \ � � c.,, � «; , f'ri'�� ,�' �.�, ,�.� �) t � r � �� � �. �y`\ �\\� •`�.•���` } �. � � Note: An asterix (') next to a zoning ,r �k'� �;� - �^ .:��' ; -� . � ��. � �. xr r ��' designation indicates the property is �? j ' r., ` , . o#� !x.r ,,.•a.� # r• w�"�.y" �\`�\� � � . � .� � �� ,�_ r� ,I� o�� , .,�\ � x � ��� ,� ., r n ` � ``,,, �� `��� ti a ' j �� govemed by a development agreement. ^`��� � � i�t� ,€ rc�;.,.+a,_;� } rqn�� �, f, tir �..� �.� ��\\.� � � � �, �r^ �''�i+ ,, � � �7 u�� � � ` .�,F aAq; � � ��� ��.a wq3 M � � �y,� t� ` � �. 'yr "' � «fl� � ic,: a i�'.hv �l � �..� t� m ! y� �� ,. ! %��,� t�` t��i'"'._� �.� s� µ'} � �!�: a ;�.. ��` �. ( � � ��� .�� S �^i. � i�S'yy�..� �i '`[5;'3'C�f"`.`�t( / - a �a �! 7 .' � �� � � y � ' t �' 1. .$ �, �� yY. � A: ... � wfr "T' : t"a 4 ��. � F ,r. Y . �" .. ���fF d� * +�1Y'` �i �"� 1 �� . �! �' �1�.� "� r � :� wY., ( �_ �<. �di r ? � l.• C 6�L".�. �k y � p . y .��. � #�C , # 4� � � R ,�,� . �,-� 5 , � "`. ' rd,a„ . F 4 �..._,.�-,w �` t �,��� �! i.:.�F }^� t{ ;�,:'� � - '.r� � r � . '1� t=..,� .�.;�1� .�., ,' � � ;�::.., .,• eM a , •#,.:: ,��"'_.'��,...F,�� � � ,�;y �� ��,"� �, ./�1 t r F� . ... � 4 �.'� � y� � . :`� r � �� � � �, �1��:» �� � , k • ..� r ` �� �°�� j x"� ''` R�a �•� �R� �F �ti�� � � "``� �' N 0 250 500 �' � � 1 �-�r� ,,r�.�'�`' ��.� � .,"' "� t�,, ,�, �� �'. ��,� s�;� ir, � y��:- Feet y-. F;.w�. S b S.?Yasi... {.ars _Y` � p.. - �! � ` # �t�` i�s�4G. �. 1 � y�, r�.X •�l Al � � ,��-G � � _�,�y�' - � i �.� � ,.1•.w., ��{�i o�` �r��t ° -:� � # QTY OF �7 .. 5..�lro��iY;.��. A� ( ��' f^ ' "' �.5� . � ��'�;.. A ', t � ' ` N r � �, f �'� ,` _r �.�`W. f' r� �Y�.' ,_. ., f, ,- '.� '. � d ', ' ��� j �� - ,� ����� ��'��.� ,t�.... Federal Way . t, , � �, �? ,� ���� , : ° � � ` �r�� � �-� ` a� t :. ,� .— � ' f .� .. � �'• ! �„ „:n. � 4:� :'�`'.�" �'� .. w ,:R�� N� . Y �� �. This map is accompanied by no warranties, , ' • � j �, - .,� �� iw'�' �"�' 's►- i�� � 4�' .�1� �.� � 4' � 4. } � r a P Y 9 P P , , _ _ _ , , ;�.', „�.�r„ ,, e; , ,• ., , •, ,, _ ; ..t��� � � . � ��� + < nd is sim I a ra hic re resentation. zo1 7G' i �' _ \ �+� � ___ � ,�. «a � � \ ` � Y Y , Y�;�, � �� .�,;�� �� ,,,� F° City of Fe eral ay . . - . . .� � � � �.,,���, . . , . . - ��;��� - .� �' ��� �\���� Zo� 2 �„ . ' ' ' . �, _. � � ,,,,���\�., ���\ Site Specific Requests . �,, Rs�z .� . � ��- - =. � �� , ��;�` � � : ��� for Comprehensive Plan and - �� . �° 4` �i� � r = � E � �� � ��� Zonin Desi nation Chan es :� � � � � � � �,.-. � ' � ��:=: �`. . A . � ,��� 9 J 9 /�� ! :\�; i� a ` ��\\: a �,' -� •� �- . . , ,. : ``'� \• � . . , �y"��\\ \���\ � � ' '" �,� � � �:.��\ � � � � � �r� �� ' '� ` ��� Barrett � � � _ .... _p . �a � !B'� ':,`�'� ` . \����\\\,\\\t , ¢� '� - , , .� �„ _4� - ' }f� r' '� � �p `' �\���, Site Specific Request #2 R 5�,��.�� _ 1NK��t. ("�`__ ...��– � ✓" �� ' � � � �,�� �b'��s�f.. � �� ��j � �\ � .� ,���; BC ��` ; _ � ° ''������� �� ��,� ��. � ' ,:� Exhibit � . ��,� ,_ . ;� � _, � �t �� _ .... .,. , ; � �� � E --- �` � � ; , . ��l� . Y �Y '�`� ., � ...N ..��-- `���,..._� r -•'- `�'<� � � � � � � x , � ��,� �� �° '� � : t li � , + � „� i... ^ �o I ., r � Q. ` F�. •+� ��' ` ( , �. , , � 4 { r : . i � � � r ��� rrr 'e t" �� s I_". �<§ r � � ��� . �.. : , � � r u ,(�':�'� p -� �'!'� — i< _.� _ . . � . ,, � , : ., � �` ' � Legend - - �.......� _ . � , � , � t � *° t + � -s°' --s ` �"-� Ir"-� - . F �� '� � -r� �� � -- �'� • Site Specific Request �, -- ' 1�.<r- ,��a.or��:,.. i,.:, �.� � : '' N'` � �� � '�� , `�; 7853600008 '; �.+.+� 1-' �� r-- ,1 �� ' :. _;, ; �� "�`"._,,��� �7!�- g���, ��r f ±.,, �c;� _, .._ Streams (Ciry SurveY) . , . �, � . . �� � _ . �. _ , 9 � . , - -t _ ��! � . _�` � i -� � ! , �� �� .�� � ��: � . F:� �Y .. ^� � ' � , � � �+�L:is t ,� ���..g,��K ..__..... ���� : � .•. . i. . � � . Wetlands (1998 City SurveY) - _ ,ret,�ra �� y'^t, .�,� _� �?� s:[ze� ��� '11u7% L._. .!�i.' F d:,,�1.�. * o -=` �,..,k',' � �� -�.� '' �'�.:1_ j� , � __� �-' � Zoning Boundary _ ' �� �� ' � ; �R-- " �- . ,;r---qiF�� _ ' �.� _ 4..: ,d,r _ � ��. � � .. �, �;�.r �� r1 % , � � —�.'�.. � r . n • a y , �••• �L M Na. ' �p . � ."Ji��. SYC �1 ��1—� ' .. "" f i. 1 r�' �..2. �� r'i �' "� �'�_.J �a --'�.Mw,.�.: �. _ � ,' *� f � �'--` - 4 — '� _ �. _ -- - � ".� ' . ' /-- � �� '' � r'�f'�- � '� _-} ' ' - Note: An asterix (') next to a zoning �— F-- . �, _ � , � .� � I � �.. o �" ,� : �''� � , vw— + � _ �� � ij �, r� �''� I � `-�G.� srl� ..�K; _'...:�_ ` 9 P P Y ; . ��� desi nation ndicates the ro ert is � . _� 'r:•:. � L,N'i�,-.-� � ; '`—�;--I �� _ ; � ,,� �.,. , �' �:., � governed by a development agreement. ` ° _ - � � �;� � ' '� "� �> "���� ! �. i, 1� ��`,�'' T'F aE, y y •s �, - - , , . ;, „ � � —��r....+�t.��� '__� , . ����, � �� '�`�i��''��������' � ; J�j�` � _ ..� , .'�r `. ��, � '"%3 ,.r .�'.ai r:,r:9si ` _ ���� _ ,- " _ � T .. � '�.e }'`_,�.,� �� �j il'1 r a._�„e. ��.. 'f���!�1���}�, Y �,�' '_ V 7 ��'*' ' � ,f � �r ��� � ';� � �' F, {j � i ��' �- ' �. "'°�u�.�._ .._._�� �'3:,c..:�i�`b. �a�id:a( � �-� � ""� ' a�a 0 250 500 �� ' ' � � . l irb ���Z�p����+,� �'�` 4� �4�, t '+'• .. 7�,.1— ' � 't � �"N"Y"" � N � � .�,. _ ^ ," �- " �; �.,� �I j � � .. , ' � � - �, s� �. Feet �� � -;f r,, r�. ,"�! ,i , ' _ yy '�,,,�� ,j� �-y-"�, �4r�---.�� .d' �. „�.,,�,�,,, � t_ � „ �,..� 7 �_�J �� i� �.�":v. �� �' ��' 4'4",j'� �:. '-�� , 'Y. �:, � I��i'��.. CITYOF . , � �� � t�„ � . _5,�� � �, � � � . _ z 4 _. .�.:._:, Y� �� � , .. _� � , - ^��_tt {� r,.,, ,'; ,�i�, �° #.. �`I �' e � � � � era ay r L`fu � � �° � � ��'' ,�' k,�� � �='� . '�� -, d ° �_ �� .� ; : ( � ; � ? �� �� �"" � ��. �•, �r ��...rrrLLL���,,, �",� ra , ` � ,i � ° , :� � � ^ This map is accompanied by no warranties, 1�,� �t:_. � MA,�.�' �/��� Ky � 7 ,- ; ° �� � �,:, . , � �'_:� .�� � �;�` �: 1- ; ;�t�;...,.: ' and is simply a graphic representation. R:\erike\cd\Pro ects\SSR Com Ian�2012\Ma s\ssr2 2012A.mxd `� �:�'_ --- , � �Y�� ' � ' City of Federal Way ,� : ::, , � . ., �' � � " • • r �' � �Al �I 1 ` �� I r '"" 2U 12 - - - - - - - � �rd. _ -.�: • � • • � .�. �. i � . - '+ �t . . . � y » . - ' . • • . ' '� � ti� o��# �,;�.� �'t �� pecific Requests -. r�g�� �. .. _ _ Site S � � { ° � >' �,_ ;'� � ` for Comprehensive Plan and �:. - -- �' � _ s�. � � ,; � • � � ' - • � ��s � �'� - � . Zoning Designation Changes �.-�, . . :,�" � �..�< � i'��`.�y� . . � � ��J}- C �; �. � Y � a �"�. -:"%:� � \ • :, w s� ;�, _ 1� _'L ,, .� ;Y �: � .. , , � - i a � "fi- �',�d .y�+ ' ;�r� i. . , �„ - y�3� VA .,.� V�����\ �p �i �' itll► �� rR 3*� � . ., . � at � .�� � � �x,��>�x. �, .�_, ��� x���.�`: � � ���� Hildebrandt . , , � ' # ���\` `„�.� �: �'. -� 1. , `�; � � -- - � k # : Site Specific Request #3 � \`�� `\ � �,�,, w � � . .,�. •:'� \, � �� � ��\� ,. ,� � ��'` - '�.._.�. _, � �" _ ' . ;;y�, , � �: � .� , .� `.� � ;,:, ,� ��^�.�,,, ,��:: ;����� ° �:� � . ��� Exhibit G� �� A� � � ��� �.� � ��� . � � � �. � '�`� � � �, , �� � :���AA �� V���� .�V������ A\� � . . ... J+. � :. �. �� � � ��� � � � � (b i 1 ` � ` �,\\� \ ' ��\� \� \\\ \\`y� ,4� [" : .,: �} . , y{..ww... � � °�� `,y» `�` � �\ \ \�� �����\\ ���. �� � 4a.. 1 �.; � �4:! ,Yra. ��y. \. � ��.�--' � ��� �� �,�.��, �. �,��,� � {�'�� ��; �" �' - � �, � Legend � .� ���t.<' .. �; ,, �'` �w �, � � '�#�•. � � �• ����.iJ �`�' � � � +� : ,�"'� � � , � ;\\ : ��\\.��` ,,� \� �'� } , :� � _-� �,, �°�-. ;: �;, . Site Specific Request '� � � ; . � � � a �`= � �� � � � � � . � � � ���y, � ., � ��� }� � , a � � �1"�: .. �� ; ����� � ��` '�`.,�' �.f� . '. � Y�: '� � zez aso�, � , � % � ��! ��' �.,' ,� ��w; � Streams (City SurveY) � '` �t'�'!td';�,-w..ad�;E� �..ti w a ` � • e ��� �. �� �� � � =.��- y �' �_� �`.- Wetlands (1998 City Survey) < � �� ' � _.,_.,.�. . , - , � � � ;_. �:. � � � �`� ��. � � � �� ; ,� ;, �� ._."`; � oning Boundary* :. � � .,. � �, . � g ,� �� * ,,�, Z : �� � �� ,��� �y5y.t �� , : : \\ � � ~ � . � `� ` A iy 'Y� M� j # ��• .3 4 '�ty1 . _ :` . � ��. �,� ..j� W �r 1. � .., sf; � � � � � :��� � \'\�\\ ;, i �A;g. ' e * , �.� ��� '�� ' �'� ~�dE +1 ' �.r'� . , Fr. � - � ��' �� '���.: ` �t, „r i� ac 2 ,�, � «.:`', � "c' �� ' �� �e.� ;�: •� ', � .; °'` *��� ���,�',�� � �_ � , ;� *�` ' �� Note: An asterix (*) next to a zoning ?� . �.:�� � : .�'x�w�t,' . � . �� a.wsjt�;.n.. ,�\� \�� � \����\ �\``. y"� ti.. ,4"' . � �'', y�. 4 \ �\ �, �!'?': y � ,�`' +� � �t ,;+�' � � .�''� ���, i� designation indicates the property is , ; `\ ' � .� �� ��` �.� `� �� ]'' ! ��� - �;� � .� � j:� ,�� � governed by a development agreement. . .,\ � \ � \ �a f � 11r" �� .�: � \ �\ .� . . +^i*'�?� � �-+�+s.w.`yt'i�+..n5S1S...+�. _.n.:`w`i4..\ W. _sr ''k `• ., v�-° ` � ,� � � .. � � � \ \ � � �:t�"S ,ws. , t ^.i" `` -�h �'S^"1�:�`�'� � V i � ,`� \ �\�\���� t� '�.- R ►�t y{�,� �� ., P�c��.* r. . y .r rx,.+4'"�- .,`)� i� i ` � � \ �� ,� .< �«�� , <� ,� �. \� � .��2 1 �Y�p � ��� � � ` ,+ ''a� ` � F �.�a 'd, a '�► � _-.,t� � r � J� �9 ' ' \ -!;: � -�+ i�+� ik�y � tlt st � ^�"�' 9' � s j+ .:� i ' � ,� t � I ,�,s,t �'�, �' ;� 'o-!y. r . � 7...C3�'� :7. :',�' Fw}���.T� 3`� ' '. �� .,F , . ! �{', •'�,,,aV ��• � "`,��r �p . A� � � t .�M ,� � 5 _' y��.� .1<: _ p � ,, � �,` ; �" -�_'�- � � + ` +^ 0 250 500 .'�'` � �'��:� .� '� ta;,� ii� > ���* � ' � •t� � ., ^�x �' .� ,, t '*• :� � 4 � �,� �i `` f...�'��i t' ,dv .t a?G��fi�f �, W .�W .. Y• . n_., {:t .. ... �`�..• - N � £ ».. . i � . ' � � � ar" ,.;, y,.�z,�,i �+N'Sk. .t' 4c � �" �; T �� � �' �i . �.. F t « , �`� '"'i _�n ;� �4 "'�„ �,� �, �'�4 +?' r� a'i 9, � �° ��- �'- `'' � ,� � �� ee ` '1F� � ', ,� . , t � �� rr?-i i I �-�,. � r ,' !!", � � . . � '.T�,� '��� " � �� ' : •� �� x,�y� +4.i 'Y�n+?��' . r��. M ��r ��,t �,��qJ ti� �� � i �.. ,� �r,,"'"�.= =�r�� urv oF �� � �� , .: � � ,y 'L'yk,,�'. ° � ,� �� �` ' � � y u�'� ^� Z �'� .'.... � i ;. ; . � ,,�. � � � �. � � .:� t� M ; � ����..�.�� � �� � -��� : ; ��.� �. � Federal W y �.. . ,� � .. ' ;: _ , :!� .. . .� . . •, . � � �.� � ,, : w,; _ ,+ i � � , r* �� , , � � �.. .t �,,�;. � ° `--_ " � ; : .. ` �' � �-��J,� �: . . ,� f - „� �� ,, .. , , i "` � '�' a ��� �,;� � """ � �,t � �Y� N,k,� , « - � •. � �# � This map is accompanied by no warranties, ,�*'��; ' e�.k°;;.; - � .�: t ,. �� �:� and is simply a graphic representation. R:\erike\cd\Pro ects\SSR Com Ian�2012\Ma slssr3 2012A.mxd COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 4, 2012 ITEM #: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Selection Process — 2012 Amendments to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) POLICY QUESTION: Should the Hoit and/or Hildebrandt requests for comprehensive plan amendment be moved forward for further evaluation? COMMITTEE: Land Use /Transportation Committee (LUTC) MEETING DATE: August 6, 2012 CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ® Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Planning Manager, Isaac Conlen DEPT: Community & Economic Development Attachments: Exhibit A) July 31, 2012, staff report to the LUTC; Exhibit B) July 2, 2012, LUTC staff report; and Exhibit C) Revised Hildebrandt request email. Background: At the July 2 2012, LUTC meeting" the committee considered three comprehensive plan amendment requests. At,that, meeting, the Barrett request was moved forward and the Hoit and Hildebrandt requests were tabled for further discussion at the August 6d' meeting. Following the July 2nd meeting, staff met with both applicants. Based on new information provided in regard to the Hoit request (availability of urban services) we are now recommending that request go forward for further consideration. The applicant on the Hildebrandt request has revised the proposal and now seeks to go from RS 15.0 single - family zoning to RS 5.0 (or alternately RS7.2) single - family zoning. We are continuing to recommend that this request not go forward as it is inconsistent with surrounding zoning and the city's comprehensive plan. Please see the attached memo (Exhibit A) for a more detailed evaluation. Also see staff report from July 2nd LUTC meeting (Exhibit B) for a full description of the original comprehensive plan amendment requests and staff analysis. Options Considered: 1) Concur with the Mayor's recommendation; 2) Do not concur with the Mayor's recommendation. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: That Site - Specific Request # 1 (Hoit) go forward for fin Cher review and Site - Specific Request #2 (Hildebrandt) not be considered further because it is not consistent with the comprehensives. MAYOR APPROVAL: 1I %I/,/lw DIRECTOR APPROVAL: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I Council meeting for a public hearing. Bob Celski. Chair PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I n; (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED IST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # Council move to forward the Mayor's recommendation to the September 4, 2012, City REVISED - 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION # K: \Comprehensive Plan \2012 Comprehensive Plan \Selection Process \LUTC \8_6_LUTC Agenda Bill.docx CITY OF Federal Way EXHIBIT DATE: July 31, 2012 To: Bob Celski, Chair Land Use /Transportation Committee (LUTC) FROM: Patrick Doherty, Director of Community and Economic Development Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Selection Process — 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments MEETING DATE: August 6, 2012 I. POLICY QUESTION Should the Hoit and/or Hildebrandt comprehensive plan amendment requests be moved forward for further consideration? II. BACKGROUND At the July 2, 2012, LUTC meeting, the committee considered three comprehensive plan amendment requests. At that meeting, the Barrett request was moved forward and the Hoit and Hildebrandt requests were tabled for further discussion to take place at the August 6th meeting. Following the July 2nd LUTC meeting, staff met with both applicants. New information regarding the Hoit request was provided to staff. The applicant on the Hildebrandt request has revised the proposal and now seeks a comprehensive plan amendment from Single Family, Medium Density to Single Family, High Density and rezone from RS 15.0 single - family zoning to RS 5.0 single - family zoning (or alternately, RS 7.2 zoning along with code amendment to allow zero lot line development). III. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS REQUESTS Following is a summary of the two citizen - initiated comprehensive plan amendments under consideration at the August 6, 2012, LUTC meeting. 2012 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS (i) File No. 11- 103859 -UP — Request from Edward Hoit for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.82 acres (parcel #112103-913 1) located to the west of Dumas Bay Park from Single Family — Low Density Residential and Suburban Estates (SE, one unit per five acres) to Single Family — Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (one unit per 15,000 square feet) (Attachment A — Hoit Vicinity Map). Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: August 6, 2012 Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page I of 3 (ii) File No. I1- 103962 -UP (Revised) – Request from Isaac Hildebrandt for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.18 acres (parcel #292104 -9071) located at 1320 South 35911' Street from Single Family– Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (one unit per 15,000 square feet) to Single Family – High Density and zoning of RS 5.0 (one unit per 5,000 square feet) (or alternately, RS 7.2, one unit per 7,200 square feet) (Attachment B – Hildebrandt Vicinity Map). V1. STAFF ANALYSIS A. Site - Specific Request #1– Hoit As detailed in the July 2, 2012, LUTC staff report (attached as Exhibit B of this agenda item for reference), when staff first evaluated the Hoit request it was determined to meet all selection criteria with the exception of Criterion #2— consistency with the overall vision of the comprehensive plan. At that time, staff did not support the request because the comprehensive plan states that the Suburban Estates (SE) designation (current designation of subject property) is intended to, "...retain larger lots in order to avoid development pressure on or near critical areas." The Hoit property is impacted by three critical areas: wetland and wetland buffer, stream and stream buffer, and steep slopes. The comprehensive plan language; however, goes onto say that, "...upon provision of urban services, such as water and sewer, an increase in density may be warranted." The applicant has since provided additional information that has caused us to change our recommendation. Specifically, the fact that a new sewer project will be bringing sewer service to the neighborhood (confirmed by Lakehaven Utility District). Additionally, a newly upgraded, looped water system was just constructed in the neighborhood to replace the outdated system previously in place. Lastly, we do not believe the rezone would result in an increase in development intensity or density and thus, is consistent with the intent of the comprehensive plan to limit development pressure on properties subject to critical areas. In light of this additional information, we feel the request to rezone the property to RS 15.0 is consistent with the comprehensive plan and would recommend it be selected for further study. B. Site - Specific Request #2 – Hildebrandt As detailed in the July 2, 2012, LUTC staff report (attached as Exhibit B of this agenda item for reference), when staff first evaluated the Hildebrandt request it was determined to meet all selection criteria with the exception of Criterion #2— consistency with the overall vision of the comprehensive plan. The request to extend multi - family zoning into the medium density single- family neighborhood was not felt to be consistent with comprehensive plan policies intended to protect the characteristics of single - family neighborhoods. Following the July 2 "d LUTC meeting, staff met with the applicant's representative and he subsequently revised the requested comprehensive plan amendment request. The new request is that the parcel be rezoned from RS 15.0 to RS 5.0 (or alternately RS 7.2). Staff continues to find the request to be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan for the following reasons: Land Use /Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: August 6, 2012 Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 2 of 3 a) If approved, the subject parcel would be the only parcel in the neighborhood zoned RS 5.0 (or RS 7.2); b) The zoning would be inconsistent with surrounding properties; c) The rezone may be considered a "spot- zone, "' which is a legally disfavored type of zoning in Washington State; d) The rezone would primarily serve a private interest rather than the public good and e) There is no rational basis for changing the designation of the subject property while maintaining the designation(s) of the surrounding lots. IX. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION A. Site - Specific Request #1— Request from Edward Hoit for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.82 acres (parcel # 112103 -9131) located to the west of Dumas Bay Park from Single Family — Low Density Residential and Suburban Estates (SE, one unit per five acres) 'to Single. Family — Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet). . Mayor's Recommendation —The Mayor recommends that the request go forward for further review because it meets all selection criteria. B.. Site-Specific.Request #2 — Request from Isaac Hildebrandt for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.18 acres (parcel #292104 -9071) located at 1320 South 359' Street from Single Family — Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (one unit per 15,000 square feet) to Single Family — High Density and RS 5.0 (one unit per 5,000 square feet) (or alternately RS 7.2, one unit per 7,200 square feet). Mayor's Recommendation —The Mayor recommends that the request not go forward for further review because it is not consistent with surrounding zoning or the comprehensive plan. XI. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment A — Vicinity Map of Site - Specific Request #I — Hoit Attachment B — Vicinity Map of Site - Specific Request #2 — Hildebrandt Attachment C — Aerial Photo of Site - Specific Request # I — Hoit Attachment D — Aerial Photo of Site - Specific Request #2 — Hildebrandt KAComprehensive Plan\2012 Comprehensive Plan \Selection ProcessTUTOStaffRepon to the LUTC.doc 1 The reasons for invalidating a rezone as an illegal spot zone usually include one or more of the following: (1) the rezone primarily serves a private interest; (2) the rezone is inconsistent with a comprehensive plan or the surrounding territory; or (3) the rezone constitutes arbitrary and capricious action. Each situation must be determined on its own facts and it is not always easy to determine conclusively whether a rezone would constitute an illegal spot zone. Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: August 6, 2012 Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 3 of 3 City of Federal Way . , . , Comprehensive Density 2012 Zonin.. Site Specific Requests for Comprehensive Plan and • - - ' • - • • - Zoning Designation Changes Hoit SE Site Specific Request #1 E^ Exhibit S =' Legend yr Paliades; Retry "$t center ^ m :: d•I� Site Specific Request RS 5.0 ^ r, Buildings w 308TH ST " Streets ) Vl�eoand "' .0 Streams (City Survey) Rating u' � Wetlands (1998 City Survey) b121039131 a 15• Associated Stream Buffer Associated Wetland Buffer SE ,�� 0 Zoning Boundary* \ Note: An asterix ( *) next to a zoning designation indicates the property is by a development agreement. governed AU��* 1 n aV RS15.0 sW SE ~ 4 RS . RS7.2 N 0 250 500 ' �S Feet »... ^ y �! X% r` A ' d CITY OF FV 1 TH T r Federal Way This map is accompanied by no warranties, nd r ` and is simply a graphic representation. RAerike\cd\Proiects \SSR Com lan\2012 \Ma s\ssr1 2012 CA Bufferrnxd SR City of Federal Way 2012 Site Specific Requests for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designation Changes Hoit Site Specific Request #1 Exhibit Legend Site Specific Request Streams (City Survey) Wetlands (1998 City Survey) QZoning Boundary* Note: An asterix (") next to a zoning designation indicates the property is governed by a development agreement. N 0 250 500 MMG;;;iiiiii Feet CITY OF Federal Way This map is accompanied by no warranties, and is simply a graphic representation. R 15.11 29210'49071 CE S 356TH ST CE Baptist Church RS 15.0 RS35.0 City of Federal Way 2012 Site Specific Requests for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designation Changes -00 Hildebrandt Site Specific Request #3 Exhibit Legend Site Specific Request Wetlands (11998 City Survey) JVQ40 Zoning Boundary* V. S 359TH ST Buildings Streets Note: An asterix next to a zoning designation indicates the property is "S 15.4 governed by a development agreement. ul ilo Z\ N 0 250 500 Feet CITY OF L Federal Way This map is accompanied by no warranties, and is simply a graphic representation. R1. City of Federal Way 2012 Site Specific Requests for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designation Changes Hildebrandt Site Specific Request #3 Exhibit Legend Site Specific Request Streams (City Survey) Wetlands (1998 City Survey) QZoning Boundary' Note: An asterix (') next to a zoning designation indicates the property is governed by a development agreement. N 0 250 500 Feet CITY OF Federal Way This map is accompanied by no warranties, and is simply a graphic representation. CITY OF A Federal Way DATE: June 25, 2012 TO: Bob Celski, Chair Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) EXHIBIT_ FROM: Patrick Doherty, Director of Community and Economic Development Margaret H. Clark, Principal Planner SUBJECT: Selection Process — 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012 I. POLICY QUESTION Which of the citizen - initiated site - specific requests for comprehensive plan amendments should City of Federal Way staff research further? II. BACKGROUND The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) requires the city to accept applications for amendments to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) text and map on an annual basis. The city received three requests in September 2011. Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080, after the September 30h deadline for accepting applications and following an LUTC recommendation, the City Council shall hold a public hearing and select those docketed amendment requests it wishes to move to the Planning Commission for further consideration. Ill. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS Changes and updates to the comprehensive plan are divided into text changes to chapters of the comprehensive plan and requests for changes to comprehensive plan designations and zoning for specific parcels, which would result in changes to the Comprehensive Plan Map and Official Zoning Map. Following is a summary of the three citizen - initiated comprehensive plan amendments received in September 2011 (2012 Comprehensive Plan Update). 2012 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS (ExhibitA - Composite Map) (i) File No. 1 1- 103859 -UP - Request from Edward Hoit for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.82 acres ( parcel #112103 -9131) located to the west of Dumas Bay Park from Single Family - L(-)-.,v Density Residential and Suburban %states (SE, one unit per five acres) i and l Ise /Transportation Committee 1 i-ii 1,C) Meeting Date: July 2. 2012 Sciection Process —Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page i ors to Single Family — Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet) (Exhibit B — Vicinity Map). (ii) File No. 1 I- 103895 -UP — Request from Mark Barrett for a comprehensive Elan amendment and rezone of 0.35 acres (parcel 9785360 -0008) located at 1836 South 308 Street from Single Family — High Density Residential and RS 7.2 (Single Family, one unit per 7,200 square feet) to Multiple Family Residential and RM 3600 (Multi- Family, one unit per 3,600 square feet) (Exhibit C — Vicinity Map). (iii)File No. 11- 103962 -UP — Request from Isaac Hildebrandt for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.18 acres (parcel #292104 -9071) located at 1320 South 359` Street from Single Family— Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet) to Multiple Family Residential and RM 2400 (Multi- Family, one unit per 2,400 square feet) (Exhibit D — Vicinity Map). W. REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION Pursuant to FWRC 19.08.050, Process VI, "Council Rezones," the City Council is required to review all requests concurrently. The first step in the process is a public hearing by the council, at which time the council selects those amendment requests it wishes staff to research further. V. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT SELECTION PROCESS July 2, 2012 LUTC Meeting — A summary of all requests will be presented to the LUTC for a recommendation on which requests should be considered further. July 17 2012 City Council Public Hearing — The City Council shall determine which requests should be considered further. VI. BACKGROUND AND STAFF ANALYSIS — SITE - SPECIFIC REQUESTS A composite map showing the location of the site - specific requests to be presented for selection is attached as Exhibit A. A. Site - Specific Request #1— Hoit 1. Summary File Number: Parcel No.: Address: Location: Size: Existing Land Use: Applicant/Owner: Existing Comprehensive Plan: Existing Zoning: 11-103859-UP 112103 -9131 None East of SW 308 "' St/43rd Ave SW and west of Dumas Bay Park 1.82 acres Vacant Edward Hoit Single Family— Low Density Residential Suburban Estates (SE, one unit per five acres) Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012 Selection Process — Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 2 of 8 Requested Comprehensive Plan: Requested Zoning: 2. Reason for the Request Single Family — Medium Density Residential RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet) The land is presently vacant and has both a Class I Wetland and a Major Stream on -site. The combination of the 200 -foot wide wetland buffer and the 100 -foot stream buffer leaves very little if any buildable land. In addition, the parcel does not have direct access to the adjacent right -of -way to the west. The owner, Mr. Hoit, has owned the parcel for over 25 years and is requesting the rezone to make it consistent with the RS 15.0 zoning to the west, thereby making it a more marketable parcel. 3. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use (Exhibit E —Aerial Map) B. Site - Specific Request #2 — Barrett 1. Summary File Number: Parcel No.: Address: Location: Size: Applicant /Owner: Existing Comprehensive Plan: Existing Zoning: Requested Comprehensive Plan: Requested Zoning: 2. Reason for the Request 11- 103895 -UP 785360 -0008 1836 South 308`h Street South of South 3081h Street and west of 19`h Avenue South 0.35 acres Mark Barrett Single Family — High Density Residential RS 7.2 (Single Family, one unit per 7,200 square feet) Multiple Family Residential RM 3600 (Multi - Family, one unit per 3,600 square feet) There is a single family house on the site. There are duplexes to the west, south, and southeast across 19`h Avenue South. The applicant is requesting Multi- Family zoning in order to build duplexes, which would be consistent with the adjacent uses. 3. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use (Exhibit F Aerial Xlap) I and Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2. 2012 Selection Process — ComprehcnsiN c Plan Amendments PaLe -3 of 8 Zoning Land Use North Suburban Estates (SE, one unit Single- Family Residential per five acres) South Suburban Estates (SE, one unit City Park per five acres) East Suburban Estates (SE, one unit City Park per five acres) West RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit Single- Family Residential per 15,000 square feet) B. Site - Specific Request #2 — Barrett 1. Summary File Number: Parcel No.: Address: Location: Size: Applicant /Owner: Existing Comprehensive Plan: Existing Zoning: Requested Comprehensive Plan: Requested Zoning: 2. Reason for the Request 11- 103895 -UP 785360 -0008 1836 South 308`h Street South of South 3081h Street and west of 19`h Avenue South 0.35 acres Mark Barrett Single Family — High Density Residential RS 7.2 (Single Family, one unit per 7,200 square feet) Multiple Family Residential RM 3600 (Multi - Family, one unit per 3,600 square feet) There is a single family house on the site. There are duplexes to the west, south, and southeast across 19`h Avenue South. The applicant is requesting Multi- Family zoning in order to build duplexes, which would be consistent with the adjacent uses. 3. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use (Exhibit F Aerial Xlap) I and Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2. 2012 Selection Process — ComprehcnsiN c Plan Amendments PaLe -3 of 8 C. Site - Specific Request #3 — Hildebrandt 1. Summary File Number: Parcel No.: Address: Location: Size: Applicant: Agent: Owners: Existing Comprehensive Plan: Existing Zoning: Requested Comprehensive Plan: Requested Zoning: 2. Reason for the Request 11- 103962 -UP 292104 -9071 1320 South 359h Street North of South 359`h Street and west of 16`h Avenue South 1.18 acres Eric Hildebrandt Isaac Hildebrandt Eric Hildebrandt and Jesse Cherian Single Family— Medium Density Residential RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet) Multiple Family Residential RM 2400 (Multi - Family, one unit per 2,400 square feet) There is a single family home on this parcel. Land uses to the east, west, and south are single - family residential. The applicants own the two parcels to the north of the subject property, which are 16.63 acres in size. They would like to build a multi - family complex on the northern parcels and use the subject parcel for additional access and as a utility easement. 3. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use (Exhibit —Aerial Map) G Zoning Land Use North RS 7.2 (Single Family, one Church and Single- Family Residential unit per 7,200 square feet) South RS 7.2 (Single Family, one Duplexes unit per 7,200 square feet) East RS 7.2 (Single Family, one Single - Family Residential and Duplexes unit per 7,200 square feet) West RM 1800 (Multi - family, one Duplex unit per 1,800 square feet) C. Site - Specific Request #3 — Hildebrandt 1. Summary File Number: Parcel No.: Address: Location: Size: Applicant: Agent: Owners: Existing Comprehensive Plan: Existing Zoning: Requested Comprehensive Plan: Requested Zoning: 2. Reason for the Request 11- 103962 -UP 292104 -9071 1320 South 359h Street North of South 359`h Street and west of 16`h Avenue South 1.18 acres Eric Hildebrandt Isaac Hildebrandt Eric Hildebrandt and Jesse Cherian Single Family— Medium Density Residential RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet) Multiple Family Residential RM 2400 (Multi - Family, one unit per 2,400 square feet) There is a single family home on this parcel. Land uses to the east, west, and south are single - family residential. The applicants own the two parcels to the north of the subject property, which are 16.63 acres in size. They would like to build a multi - family complex on the northern parcels and use the subject parcel for additional access and as a utility easement. 3. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use (Exhibit —Aerial Map) G lx a P Land Use /Transportation Committee (1,11TC) Meeting Date: 1 Selection Process - Comprehensive Plan Amendments age e 4 4 o off f 8 Zoning Land Use North RM 2400 (Multi - Family, one Vacant and Manufacturing Plant unit per 2,400 square feet) South RS 15.0 (Single Family, one Single- Family Residential unit per 15,000 square feet) East RS 15.0 (Single Family, one Single - Family Residential unit per 15,000 square feet) lx a P Land Use /Transportation Committee (1,11TC) Meeting Date: 1 Selection Process - Comprehensive Plan Amendments age e 4 4 o off f 8 West RS 15.0 (Single Family, one Single- Family Residential unit per 15,000 square feet) VII. SELECTION CRITERIA FWRC 19.80.080 contains criteria for selecting amendments for further consideration. A. Criterion #1— Whether the same area or issue was studied during the last amendment process and conditions in the immediate vicinity have significantly changed so as to make the requested change within the public interest. Response to Criterion #1— Request Response Site Specific Request #1— This issue was not studied during the last amendment process, or Hoit during any previous amendment cycle. Site Specific Request # 2 — This issue was not studied during the last amendment process, or Barrett during any previous amendment cycle. Site Specific Request # 3 — This issue was not studied during the last amendment process. The Hildebrandt two parcels to the north, which are also owned by the applicants, were rezoned from Commercial Enterprise (CE) to Multi- Family (RM 2400) as part of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process. B. Criterion #2 — The proposed amendment is consistent with the overall vision of the comprehensive plan. Response to Criterion #2 — Request Response Site Specific Request #1— Changing the designation of this parcel from Suburban Estates Hoit (SE) to Single Family — High Density Residential (RS 15.0) would not be consistent with the overall vision of the comprehensive plan. The existing SE designation for the subject parcel is consistent with the vision of the comprehensive plan to retain larger urban lots on or near critical areas in order to avoid development pressure. The comprehensive plan states that there are two notable locations that meet this criterion: Spring Valley, located in the southern portion of the city; and along Puget Sound near Dumas Bay in the vicinity of Camp Kilworth and the Palisades Retreat property. This property is west of and abuts Dumas Bay Park. Site Specific Request # 2 — Designating this parcel as multi - family is consistent with Land Use Barrett Policy LUP23, which is supportive of locating multiple- family development where transportation and capital facilities i improvements are available. All utilities are available to the site. In j addition, the parcel is adjacent to South 308`h Street, a minor collector. which is intended to connect higher density areas to the arterial system. The proposed amendment would also allow development of the site to be consistent with adjacent land uses. Land tisei "Fran.ponation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012 Selection Proccx-. Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 5 of 8 Request Response Site Specific Request # 3 — This request is not consistent with the comprehensive plan policy Hildebrandt to preserve and protect Federal Way's single - family neighborhoods (LUG3). C. Criterion #3 — Whether the proposed amendment meets the existing state and local laws, including the GMA. Response to Criterion #3 — None of the proposed amendments, if adopted, would be in conflict with local or state laws if subsequent development of the parcels are in compliance with local and state regulations, including the FWRC and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). D. Criterion #4 — In the case of text amendments, or other amendments to goals or policies, whether the request benefits the city as a whole versus a selected group. Response to Criterion #4 — Not applicable. The requests are site - specific requests and not requests for text amendments. If the request meets the criteria set forth in subsections above, it shall be further evaluated according to the following criteria: E. Criterion #1— Whether the proposed amendment can be incorporated into planned or active projects. Response to Criterion #1— If the City Council determines that these requests should be analyzed further, they can be incorporated into the 2012 Planning Commission Work Program. F. Criterion 42 —Amount of analysis necessary to reach a recommendation on the request. If a large -scale study is required, a request may have to be delayed until the following year due to workload, staffing levels, etc. Response to Criterion 92 — None of the requests require a large -scale study. G. Criterion 43 — Volume of requests received. A large volume of requests may necessitate that some requests be reviewed in a subsequent year. Response to Criterion #3 — Only three requests were received for the 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Cycle. H. Criterion 94 — Order of requests received. Response to Criterion 94 — The requests were received in the following order: 1. Hoit 2. Barrett 3. Hildebrandt Land Use /Transportation committee (FU rC) Meeting Date- July 12012 Selection Process — Coinprehea <i c Plan Amendments Page 6 of 8 VIII. COUNCIL ACTION Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080(4), based on its review of requests according to the criteria in Section VII of this staff report, the City Council shall determine which requests shall be further considered for adoption and shall forward those requests to the Planning Commission for its review and recommendation. The council's decision whether to consider a proposed amendment shall not constitute a decision or recommendation that the proposed amendment should be adopted, nor does it preclude later council action to add an amendment for consideration. IX. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION A. Site-Specific Request #1— Request from Edward Hoit for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.82 acres (parcel #112103 -9131) located to the west of Dumas Bay Park from Single Family — Low Density Residential and Suburban Estates (SE, one unit per five acres) to Single Family — Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet). Mayor's Recommendation —The Mayor recommends that the request not go forward for further review because it does not conform to the comprehensive plan. B. Site - Specific Request 42 — Request from Mark Barrett for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 0.35 acres (parcel #785360 -0008) located at 1836 South 308`h Street from Single Family — High Density Residential and RS 7.2 (Single Family, one unit per 7,200 square feet) to Multiple Family Residential and RM 3600 (Multi- Family, one unit per 3,600 square feet). Mayor's Recommendation — The Mayor recommends that the LUTC forward the proposed amendment request for consideration by the Planning Commission, LUTC, and City Council. C. Site - Specific Request #3 — Request from Isaac Hildebrandt for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of 1.18 acres (parcel #292104 -9071) located at 1320 South 359`h Street from Single Family— Medium Density Residential and RS 15.0 (Single Family, one unit per 15,000 square feet) to Multiple Family Residential and RM 2400 (Multi- Family, one unit per 2,400 square feet). Mayor's Recommendation —The Mayor recommends that the request not go forward for further review because it does not conform to the comprehensive plan. X. LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The LUTC forwards the recommendation to the full Council as follows: 1. Hoit Request a) That the request go forward for further consideration. b) That the request not go forward for further consideration. Land Use/Transportation Comnutree 11 U 1 C) Meeting f)atr: lui\ 2.2012 Selection Process — Comprehcnsik:: Plan Amendments Page 7 orb APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: Bob Celski, Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member 2. Barrett Request a} That the request go forward for further consideration. b) That the request not go forward for further consideration. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: Bob Celski Chair 'Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member 3. Hildebrandt Request a) That the request go forward for further consideration. b} That the request not go forward for further consideration. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: Bob Celski Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member XI. LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Composite Map Vicinity Map of Site - Specific Request #I —Hoit Vicinity Map of Site - Specific Request #2 — Barrett Vicinity Map of Site - Specific Request #3 — Hildebrandt Aerial Photo of Site - Specific Request # I — Hoit Aerial Photo of Site - Specific Request #2 — Barrett Aerial Photo of Site - Specific Request #3 — Hildebrandt KXomprehensive Plan\2012 Comprehensive Plan\Selection Process\LUfC\Staff Report to the LUTC.doc Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Selection Process - Comprehensive Plan Amendments Nleeiing Date: July 2, 2012 Page 8 of 8 AbbeyRRd July 27th, 2012 Federal Way City Hall EXHIBIT ATTN: • Isaac Conlen • Margaret Clark 33325 8°i Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063 -9718 RE: 07 -179, City of Federal Way File No. 11-103962-UP, 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Request for and of Hildebrandt Request for Parcel #: 292104 -9071, Dear Isaac and Margaret, The following information is provided as a follow up to the Land Use And Transportation Committee meeting of 8 July 2012 and my follow up meeting with City Staff on 25 July 2012 in regards to City of Federal Way File No. 11- 103962 -UP, 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Request for and of Hildebrandt Request for Parcel #: 292104 -9071, The following information is provided to modify and support the Master Land Use Application of 24 Sept 2011 for 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Request for and of Hildebrandt Request for Parcel #: 292104 -9071 (See Attached). Please accept this information in general to change the following: Proposed Amendment. Modify / Change the proposed requested Comprehensive and Zoning change as follows: Comprehensive Plan Requested Change: From: Single Family - Medium Density Residential To: Single Family - High Density Residential Zoning Requested Change: From: Single Family - High Density Residential (RS -15) To: Single Family - High Density Residential RS 5.0 (That allows "0" Lot line Development) Alternate to: Single Family - High Density Residential RS 7.2 (If the code was changed to allow °0" Lot line Development) Abbey Road Group Land Development Services Company, LLC PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98371 Phone: 253 -435 -3699 Fax: 253-446-3159 www.abbeyroadgroup.com Please accept this information as a modification / Change and supportive documentation in regards to the City of Federal Way File No. 11- 103962 -UP, 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Request for and of Hildebrandt Request for Parcel #: 292104 -9071 If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (253) 435 -3699 x1516. Sincerely, Gi Hu sma CEO - Director of Land Development Services Abbey Road Group Land Development Services Company, LLC 253 - 435 -3699 Phone 253- 446 -3159 Fax Gil. HulsmannOAbbeyRoadGroup. com www.abbevroadaroup.com Attachments: • Zoning Request Modification Summary and Support / Justification Document • Area Vicinity Aerial Map • Site Area Vicinity Aerial Map • City of Federal Way Site Area Comprehensive Map • City of Federal Way Site Zoning Map City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Update / Adjustment) Request for Hildebrandt Parcel #: 292104 -9071, File No. 11-103962-UP, 2012 27 July 2012 SUBJECT: Zoning Request Modification Summary and Support / Justification Document Proposed Amendment. Comprehensive Plan requested Change: From: Single Family - Medium Density Residential To: Single Family - High Density Residential Zoning Reguested Change: From: Single Family - High Density Residential (RS -15) To: Single Family - High Density Residential RS 5.0 (That allows "0" Lot line Development) Alternate to: Single Family - High Density Residential RS 7.2 (If the code was changed to allow "0" Lot line Development) SUPPORT FOR THE AMENDMENT The proposed area that the parcel is located in as no transition zone between commercial / Multi Family on the north and the medium density Residential to the south. Also the zoning itself is the original zoning that was in place prior to the full area infrastructure being in placed (Roads, Water, Sanitary). Additionally the area itself consists of high use areas of non residential homes and lots, "A Church, A High School, A City storage Facility / Yard and additional adjacent Multi Family Developments to the east and proposed to the north ". As stated and indicated above there is no transition zone established for this area. The comprehensive Plan states that: Housing is a basic need and a major factor in the quality of life for individuals and families. An adequate supply of affordable attractive and functional housing is fundamental to achieving a sense of community. The central issue related to land use is supplying enough land to accommodate projected growth for a range of incomes and households. Presently, housing is provided primarily in single - family subdivisions or multiple -unit complexes. This plan devises strategies to increase housing_ options and choices. The Land Use chapter advocates changes to current development codes to increase flexibility in platting land and encourage housing as part of mixed -use developments in commercial areas. The latter provides an opportunity to locate housing closer to employment and shopping, and to create affordable housing. The demand for and development of single - family housing is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. Single- family development will occur as in -fill development of vacant lots scattered throughout existing neighborhoods and as subdivisions on vacant tracts of land. To address future housing needs, the Land Use chapter encourages new techniques for developing single- family subdivisions. Such techniques include clustering, planned unit developments, lot size averaging, cottage housing, zero lot line development, accessory dwelling units, and special needs housing. • To address future housing needs, the Land Use chapter encourages new techniques for developing single-family subdivisions. Such techniques include clustering, planned unit developments, lot size averaging, cottage housing, zero lot line development, accessory dwelling units, and special needs housing. (See actual code full text below) • Single Family High Density residential designations are located within close and convenient proximity to neighborhood business centers, areas of existing or future employment, n i , and existing urban infrastructure and services. Future Single Family High Density development should have good access to collector and arterial streets. (See actual code full text below) • Goal LUG3.1 Provide wide range of housing densities and tyges in the single- family Designated areas. • Policies - LUP16 Revise existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new single- family developments and in -fill. - LUP19 Consider special development techniques (e.g., lot size averaging cottage housing and planned unit developments) in single - family areas, provided they result in residential development consistent with the quality and character of existing neighborhoods. Analysis Overview: In review of the area and the code we believe the above and following not only supports the propose zoning change from Single Family - Medium Density Residential to Single Family - High Density Residential for this lot but also we believe that the city should look at establishing a transition zone between the Multi Family Zoning to the North and East and the Single Family - Medium Density Residential to the south of South 359' Street by establishing a transition zone of High Density Single Family Residential SF 7.2 or SF 5.0 between the RM 2,400 Multi Family zoning on the North of the area and the Medium Density Residential RS 15,000 density to the south of this area. Allowing for a transiting of RM 2,400 to High Density Single Family Residential SF 7.2 or SF 5.0 to Medium Density Single Family RS 15. ""As a reminder, Single Family - High Density Residential is Not Multi Family Development Questions to Consider per the Comprehensive Plan Process: 1. QUESTION: o Was the same area or issue studied during the last amendment process and / or conditions in the immediate vicinity significantly changed so as to make the requested change within the Public interest? ANSWERS: • This area has not been studied in the last 5 plus years. • This area has changed in the past 5 plus years because of the adjacent zoning being changed last year. • The site area now has complete infrastructure • Transit has moved closer to the site in the last 5 plus years • Adjacent retailed has moved closer to the site over the last in the last 5 plus years • A new proposed I — 5 Connection is moving closer to the site this year. 2. QUESTION: o Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the overall vision of the comprehensive plan. ANSWERS: Yes as stated in the Comprehensive Plan: The demand for and development of single - family housing is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. Single- family development will occur as in -fill development of vacant lots scattered throughout existing neighborhoods and as subdivisions on vacant tracts of land. To address future housing needs, the Land Use chapter encourages new techniques for developing single - family subdivisions. Such techniques include clustering, planned unit developments, lot size averaging, cottage housing, zero lot line development, accessory dwelling units, and special needs housing. 3. QUESTION: o Whether the proposed amendment meets existing state and local laws, including the Growth Management Act. ANSWERS: o Yes, The demand for and development of single - family housing is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. Single- family development will occur as in -fill development of vacant lots scattered throughout existing neighborhoods and as subdivisions on vacant tracts of land. 4. QUESTION: o In the case of text amendments or other amendments to goals or policies, whether the request benefits the city as a whole versus a selected group. ANSWERS: Yes — The proposed amendment provides for a transition zone between zoning uses and density's as is throughout the city and also as identified in the City code. And the request meets the demand for and development of single - family housing based on the expected increase need for the foreseeable future. Single- family development will occur as in -fill development of vacant lots scattered throughout existing neighborhoods and as subdivisions on vacant tracts of land. To address future housing needs, the Land Use chapter encourages new techniques for developing single- family subdivisions. Such techniques include clustering, planned unit developments, lot size averaging, cottage housing, zero lot line development, accessory dwelling units, and special needs housing. 5. QUESTION: o If the request meets the criteria set forth in 1 -4 above, it shall be further evaluated according to the following criteria: ANSWERS: o Yes. 6. QUESTION: o Whether the proposed amendment can be incorporated into planned or active projects ANSWERS: o In is our understanding the proposed amendment can be incorporated into planned or active projects of the City Staff. 7. QUESTION: o Amount of analysis necessary to reach a recommendation on the request. If a large -scale study is required, a request may have to be delayed until the following year due to workloads, staffing levels, etc. ANSWERS: o In is our understanding the requested study's can be incorporated within the availability work Plan of the City Staff? 8. QUESTION: o Volume of requests received. A large volume of requests may necessitate that some requests be reviewed in a subsequent year. ANSWERS: o In our understanding the request volume(s) is within the availability work Plan of the City Staff. Comprehensive Plan Support Information: The following information is taken from the City of Federal Way's Comprehensive Plan in support of this request. • Single Family - Medium Density Residential RS 35,000 & 15,000 • Single Family - High Density Residential RS 9600, 7200, 5000 • Multiple Family Residential RM 3600, 2400, 1800 Residential Areas Single Family Federal Way is known for its quality single - family neighborhoods. This section contains goals and policies that will shape future development and protect or improve the character and livability of established neighborhoods. The demand for and development of single - family housing is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. Single- family development will occur as in -fill development of vacant lots scattered throughout existing neighborhoods and as subdivisions on vacant tracts of land. To address future housing needs, the Land Use chapter encourages new techniques for developing single- family subdivisions. Such techniques include clustering, planned unit developments, lot size averaging, cottage housing, zero lot line development, accessory dwelling units, and special needs housing. Single Family Medium Density The Single Family Medium Density designation creates urban lots with a density range of one to three dwelling units per acre to avoid developing on or near environmentally sensitive areas. The Single Family Medium Density designation can be found along the Puget Sound shoreline and south of South 356th Street, both east and west of SR 99. Lot sizes of 35,000 and 15,000 square feet provide for a transition in density between land designated as Single Family High Density Residential and Single Family Low Density Residential. Some areas designated as Single Family Medium Density Residential still lack urban services and infrastructure. Upon provision of urban services, such as water and sewer, an increase in density may be warranted. The relatively large lot sizes along the Puget Sound shoreline areas are appropriate due to geological features including steep slopes and landslide hazards commonly associated with marine bluffs. As with the Single Family Low designation, the Single Family Medium designations south of South 356th are located in the West Branch Hylebos Creek Sub - Basin. As noted in the Single Family Low Density description, this sub -basin contains a number of environmentally sensitive areas. This area of lower density zoning occurs on both the east and west sides of 1st Avenue South. However, there are major environmental land ownership differences between the two areas. The area east of 1st Avenue South is characterized by the Hylebos Wetlands and associated streams. In addition, there are many parcels that are either publicly owned or are intended as wetland mitigation for development elsewhere in the drainage basin. Therefore, based on the relative absence of environmental constraints and the future availability of public services in the area west of 1st Avenue South, an increase in density may be warranted. Single Family High Density A majority of the single - family residential land in the City is designated as Single Family High Density. Urban densities of approximately 4.5, 6.0, and 8.7 dwelling units per acre in the RS 9.6, RS 7.2, and RS 5.0 zoning districts respectively, provide for a range of housing densities. Single Family High Density residential designations are located within close and convenient proximity to neighborhood business centers, areas of existing or future employment, transit, and existing urban Infrastructure and services. Future Single Family High Density development should have good access to collector and arterial streets. Goal • LUG3 Preserve and protects Federal Way's single- family neighborhoods. LUG3.1 Provide wide range of housing densities and types in the single- family designated areas. Policies • LUP14 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future single - family Neighborhoods through strict enforcement of the City's land use regulations. • LUP15 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non - residential uses. • LUP16 Revise existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new single- family developments and in -fill. • LUP17 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve single - family neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian circulation. • LUP18 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in and adjacent to residential areas to preserve the natural setting of Federal Way. LUP19 Consider special development techniques (e.g., lot size averaging, cottage housing, and planned unit developments) in single- family areas, provided they result in residential development consistent with the quality and character of existing neighborhoods. • LUP20 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, watercourses, vistas, and similar features) using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, and lot size averaging. Abbey Road Group Land Development Services Company, LLC PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98371 Phone: 253 -435 -3699 Fax: 253-446-3159 www.abbeyroadgroup.com City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan + } t i i .. a . j i fi J ; s= �. ���3•+�7rNs''. �Xf .� I�UU LJ{�.�l�i�.{ ._• t f� s High School •. -'� l mf ` Ao Park _ I _- r t. i" i'llCllitiiCA f? ±�* 4► Legend: Comprehensive Plan Designations CRY Center Core q CRY Center Frame Community Business Commerdal Entorprise COMMOrdaYlk8oreatlon Corporate Park [ ! Multi-Family Neighborhood Commerdai Oftloo Perk t Parks and Open space Professional office & note Family, Low Density Single Famiy, Medium ()amity Single Family, High Dertsily federal Way Zoning Designations: 'z BC- Ccmm-mtty Business Oft - Nefghtahocd Business CE - Cemmardel Erslefpdse Atnced -Us9 Zones CC - City Center Core CF - City Center Framo MuRFFarmV.1(my Rk110O0. 1 Ualt 1 1,000 Square Feet RM2400. 1 Umk f 2.400 Square Feet RM35W - 1 MR 13,6W Sure Feet OMce Zones CP -I - Corporate Park O:'' - OFrce Park O? -t - Office Park 1 O ?•2 - (hfirce Fan: 2 ".; 1 O ?•3 - Office Park 3 0;`-4 -O,YMa Pork 4 PO - Professioial Me +BFami�2er+as RS15.0. 1 Unlit 15.000 Square Feet RS35.0 - 1 lint 135,000 &Vivo Feet RSSA - 1 WI 1 5,000 Square Feet R372 -1 Unl / 7200 Square feat R69.6 - I Wi 0" Square Feet SF. -1 UM 15 A-.rra City of Federal Way Zoning rcuua r f. r e' r r r it l :� r COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 4, 2012 ITEM #: LO 6 — CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Selection Process – 2012 Amendments to the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) POLICY QUESTION: Should the citizen- initiated request to allow senior housing with an assisted living component be allowed in the Professional Office (PO) zone? COMMIITEE: Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012 CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ® Puble Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Principal Planner Margaret Clark DErT: Community dt Economic Developtaent Attachments: Juno 26, 2012, Staff Report to the LUTC with Exhibit A. Background: The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) requires the city to accept applications for ads to the FWRC on an annual basis. The city received one request in February 2012, which was after the September 30* deadline for accepting applications. However, pursuant to FWRC 19.08.030, the City Council may, at its discretion, accept requests at any time of the year. Per FWRC 19.80.080, after consideration by the LUTC, the City Council shall hold a public heating and select those docketed amendment requests it wishes to move to the Planning Commission for further consideration. Opdous Considered: 1) Concur with the Mayor's recommendation; 2) Do not concur with the Mayor's rocommeadation. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: That the amendment request goes forward for further consideration. MAYOR APPROVAL: ��.Z2� " DIRECTOR APPROVAL: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the Mayor's recommendation to 2012, City Cd d izc� -4 t -i 61si Council meetingfor a public hearing. Jlk .V PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the Mayor's recommendation." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLEALS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APMOVED COUNCIL DILL N © DENIED 1ST reamus • TABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION Eaat t roams • MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE tl aevED- oa12m10 RESOLUTION N K.\2012 Code AmwAnimts\Senior Housing is PO Zone \Selection ProcesALUTC\Agaida Sitt.doc 4ik CITY OF Federal Way DATE: June 26, 2012 To: Bob Celski, Chair Land Use /Transportation Committee (LUTC) FRoM: Patrick Doharty, Director of Community and Evonontic Development Margaret H. Clark, Principal Planner SUBJECT: Selection Process — 2012 Code Amendments MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012 L POLICY QUESTION Should the citizen - initiated request to allow senior housing with an assisted living component be allowed in the Professional Office (PO) zone? II. BACKGROUND The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) requires the city to accept applications for amendments to the FWRC on an annual basis. The city received one request in February 2012, which was after the September 30th deadline for accepting applications. However, pursuant to FWRC 19.08.050, the City Council may, at its discretion, accept requests at any time of the year. Per FWRC 19.80.080, after consideration by the Land Use Transportation Committee (LUTC), the City Council shall hold a public hearing and select those docketed amendment requests it wishes to move to the Planning Commission for further consideration. III. DESCRtlnoN OF REQUEST Ron Mitchell with Safety Senior contacted city staff about locating a senior housing prged consisting of 50 to 70 units on property zoned Professional Office (PO) located at 31919 66 Avenue South. Senior housing is not an allowable use in this zone. Staff considered whether this site was a candidate for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone to Office Park (OP), which does allow senior housing. However, since the OP zone allows a wide range of uses as shown in Exhibit A, the OP zone designation did not appear to be an appropriate one for this location due to its proximity to single family residential zoning. IV. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY FOR CODE AMENDMENT SELECTION PROCESS July 2, 2012 LUTC Meting The request will be presented to the LUTC for a recommendation on whether it should be considered further. July 17 2012 City Council Public Hearing — The City Council shall determine whether the request should be considered further. Land Use/Transport don Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012 Selection Process — Code Amendments Page 1 of 3 V. SELECTION CRITERIA FWRC 19.80.080 contains criteria for selecting amendments for further consideration. A. Criterion #1— Whether the same area or issue was studied during the last amendment process and conditions in the immediate vicinity have significantly changed so as to make the requested change within the public interest. Response to Criterion #1— A request to allow senior housing in the PO zow was not studied during the last amendment process, or during any previous amendment cycle. B. Criterion #2 —'Me proposed amendment is consistent with the overall vision of the comprehensive plan. Response to Criterion #2 — The request to allow senior housing in the PO zone is consistent with the city's economic development policy to work with the private sector to actively bring in new development, businesses, and jobs to the community (EDPiO). In addition, senior housing would be compatible with already allowable uses such as office, schools, and governmental facilities in the PO zone. C. Criterion #3 — Whether the proposed amendment meets the existing state sad local laws, including the GMA. Response to Criterion #3 — The proposed amendment to allow senior housing in the PO zone is not in conflict with local or state laws and meets the Growth Management Act's mandate to make adequate provisions for existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community (RCW 36.70A.070[2][d]). Additional senior housing will fill the need generated by the aging baby boomers that are presently turning 63 at the rate of approximately 10,000 per day nationwide. D. Criterion #4 — In the can of text amendments, or other amendments to goals or policies, whether the request benefits the city as a whole versus a selected group. Response to Criterion #4 — A code amendment to allow senior housing in the PO Zone would benefit the city as a whole as it may allow development of vacant land in the PO zone for senior housing as there does not presently appear to be a high demand for additional office space. As of June 2010, the City of Federal Way had approximately 730,000 square feet of vacant office space out of a total of approximately three million square feet.' If the request meets the criteria set forth in subsections above, it shall be further evaluated according to the following criteria: E. Criterion #1— Whether the proposed amendment can be incorporated into planned or active projects. Response to Criterion #1— This request can be incorporated into the 2012 Planning Commission Work Program. 'Source- a oPltcespace.com Land Userrransportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Date: July 2, 2012 Selection Process — Code Amendments Page 2 of 3 F. Criterion #2 — Amount of analysis necessary to reach a recommendation on the request. If a large -scale study is required, a request may have to be delayed until the following year due to workload, staffing levels, etc. Response to Criterion #2 — This request does not require a large -scale study. G. Criterion #3 — Volume of requests received. A large volume of requests may necessitate that some requests be reviewed in a subsequent year. Response to Criterion #3 — This was the only citizen - initiated request received for this year's work program. H. Criterion #4 — Order of requests received. Response to Criterion #4 — This was the only request received. VI. COUNCIL ACTION Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.084(4), the City Council shall determine whether this request should be further considered, and if so, shall forward it to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation. The council's decision whether to consider a proposed amendment shall not constitute a decision or recommendation that the proposed amendment should be adopted, nor does it preclude later council action to add an amendment for consideration. VII. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION The Mayor recommends that the LUTC forward the proposed amendment request to the City Council for further consideration. VIII. LAND USE/TRANstORTATim COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The LUTC forwards the recommendation to the full Council as follows: a) *K— That the request go forward for further consideration. b) That the request not go forward for further consideration. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: Bob Celski, Chair Jeanne Burbidge, Member Susan Honda, Member MMMMMMOMMI KA2012 Code AmendmentsZenior Housing in PO Z.oneSelection ProcesALUT OStaff Report to the LUTC.doc Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting Data July 2, 2012 Selection Process — Code Amendments Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A USES ALLOWED IN THE OFFICE PARK (OP) ZONE • Office • Banking and related financial services • Retail sales of grocery, produce, and related items • Retail establishment providing office supplies, printing, and duplicating • Restaurant (50 seats maximum) • Connnar+c:ial recreation facility • Commercial/industrial photography, cinematography, video production, broadcast studio • Newspaper Printing Plant • Research, development, & testing facility, including electronics technology & dual lab • Accessory warehouse facility • Convention, conference, and trade centers associated with other permitted use • School, college, university, business, or vocational school • Day care facilities, except Class II Home Occupations • Hospital, convalescent center, nursing home • Funeral home, mortuary • Government facility • Public park • Public transit shelter • Public utility • Personal wireless service facility r -\2012 Code Ammdnwnts \Senior Housing in PO Zone\Selection Process \LUTC\EXHI®iT A.doc COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 4, 2012 ITEM #: � yt CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) LOAN REVIEW ADVISORY COMMITTEE POLICY QUESTION: Which applicants should the City Council appoint to the CDBG Loan Review Advisory Committee? COMMITTEE: N/A MEETING DATE: N/A CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ® City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Carol McNeill CI Clerk DEPT. Human Resources ........_..........._...._.....__.._.._ ........................................._.......................__....................._..._..............._ �............_ tY.._.........................................._.........._._.............................._...._._...__..........._................ ................._............� .........--- .._...._.__-- ...... Background: On July 17, 2012 the City Council approved ordinance 12 -725 establishing the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Loan Review Advisory Committee. The committee is comprised of five members that are appointed by the City Council and serve without compensation. Persons appointed to the committee shall reside or own a business within the corporate limits of the City. Five positions are available for appointment. Three members shall be initially appointed to a two -year term and two members shall be initially appointed to a three -year term. Thereafter each member shall serve a term of two years. At their September 4, 2012 Special Meeting the City Council interviewed six applicants seeking appointment to the committee. Options Considered: 1. Appoint as a voting member with a term of August 31, 2014. Appoint as a voting member with a term of August 31, 2014. Appoint as a voting member with a term of August 31. 2014. Appoint as a voting member with a term of August 31, 2015. Appoint as a voting member with a term of August 31, 2015. 2. Direct the City Clerk to recruit for additional applicants. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: N/A MAYOR APPROVAL: N/A N/A DIRECTOR APPROVAL: N/A 1 K Committee Council Committee Council PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move the following appointments to the Community Development Block Grant Loan Review Advisory Committee... " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED 1ST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO THE HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION POLICY QUESTION: Which applicants should the City Council appoint to the Human Services Commission? COMMITTEE: N/A MEETING DATE: N/A CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ® City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Carol McNeill y, Clerk DEPT: Human Resources ......................... _.. ............ _.._......-.......__......._...--_-.._............................._....................... ................_Y,... .... ....- ' -- -----..-................._...-......._..........................................._........_.................._. ....... _._ ........... _._- ........... __._ ......... __ ....... _ ........... __._....._.... -- - _ —_ Background: The Human Services Commission is comprised of nine voting members that serve three -year terms. There is one vacant position with a term of January 31, 2013 available for appointment due to a member resignation. The City Clerk advertised the vacancy and received two applicants (Lydia Assefa- Dawson and Brian Sandler). The Council Rules of Procedure state when a vacancy occurs, the Council will appoint a member to fill the remainder of the un- expired term. At their September 4, 2012 Special meeting the Council interviewed two applicants seeking appointment to the Commission. Options Considered: 1. Appoint to the Human Services Commission to fill the remainder of an un- expired term of January 31, 2013. 2. Direct the City Clerk to re- advertise the vacancy. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: N/A MAYOR APPROVAL: N/A N/A Committee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N /A. DIRECTOR APPROVAL: N/A P* Committee Council PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move the following appointment to the Human Services Commission... " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED 1ST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED — 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION # SUBJECT: 2013 -2014 HUMAN SERVICES GENERAL FUND GRANTS FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council approve the funding recommendations for the 2013 -2014 Human Services General Fund (HSGF) grants? COMMITTEE: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety MEETING DATE: August 14, 2012 CATEGORY: Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing VCity Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Jay Bennett, Community Services Manager DEPT: Community & Economic ...... . ............ ..................._Development Services ... _ ....... _._ ....... -- Attachments: Human Services Commission 2013 -2014 HSGF grants funding recommendations Revised 6 17-p/iz HSC- Nodih� recommendA+oneafter PRHS ""Covnwit4 ,ee, Background (eferral 8/14-/12.. Every two years, the City Council authorizes funding for Human Services General Fund (HSGF) grants to support human services programs that serve Federal Way residents. In 2010, the Council approved a 20 percent increase to the previous HSGF budget of $430,000, resulting in a budget of $516,000 for 2011 and 2012. The final HSGF budget for 2013 -2014 will be determined by the City Council later in the year. Human Services Commission Process: HSGF applications were received through a Notice of Funds Available process, which closed April 23, 2012. Applicants utilized the Share 1app online application system to apply for grants. Applications were reviewed and rated by City staff and members of the HSC and were discussed in -depth at the Commission's June 21St retreat. The Commission approved a preliminary HSGF funding recommendation at their July 16 meeting. On August 1St, the HSC held a public hearing to receive public comments on their proposed funding recommendations. Following the public hearing, the Commission approved two funding recommendations: one based on a continuing HSGF budget of $516,000, and one based on a reduced HSGF budget of $430,000. The HSC also approved a Contingency Plan in the event that City Council authorized additional funding. The Commission's recommendations are contained in the attached spreadsheet. Options: 1. Approve the Human Services Commission's funding recommendations for the 2013 -2014 Human Services General Fund grants and the Contingency Plan. 2. Direct staff to make changes to the Human Services Commission's funding recommendations for the 2013 -2014 Human Services General Fund grants. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: Conunitfee C6uncil ttee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to refer the recommendations for the 2013 -2014 Human Services General Fund grants and the Contingency Plan back to the Human Services Commission for review and recommendation and to be placed on the September 4, 2012 consent agenda for approval. Committee Chair ee Member Committee PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the of the Human Services Commission's funding recommendation for the 2013 -2014 Human Services General Fund grants and the Contingency Plan. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED 1ST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED- 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION # HSC 2013-2014 Final Funding Recommendation (8/1/12) Strategy #1 Agencies: Basic Human Services Needs 2013-2014 Amount Amount HSC Strategy #1 Program Name Requested Funded in Funded in Funding HSC Funding HSGF Through Funding of Emergency Services Funds 2012 HSGF 2012 CDBG Recomm. Recomm. Contingency $516,000 $430,000 Plan 1 FUSION Transitional Housing Program $15,000 $10,000 $15,000 $13,500 2 Catholic Community Services Emergency Assistance Program $20,000 $13,500 $13,500 $13,500 3 YWCA-Seattle-King-Snohomish Emergency Housing Program $4,000 $0 $0 $0 4 Catholic Community Services Reach Out Winter Response Shelter $35,000 $20,000 $25,000 $20,000 5 HealthPoint Primary Medical Care $37,000 $10,000 $15,000 $10,000 6 Multi-Service Center Food & Clothing Bank $50,000 $35,100 $36,100 $33,600 7 Multi-Service Center Emergency Shelter & Transitional Hsg. $45,000 $38,000 $38,000 $36,000 8 Seattle-KC Department of Public Health South KC Mobile Medical Program $15,250 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 9 HealthPoint Primary Dental Care $31,000 $15,900 $10,027 $15,900 $15,900 10 St Vincent de Paul Emergency Human Services $26,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 11 Kent Youth and Family Services Watson Manor Transitional Housing $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 12 Multi-Service Center Rent & Emergency Assistance $30,000 $0 $20,000 $15,000 13 Child Care Resources Homeless Child Care Program $6,677 $6,500 $0 $0 14 Federal Way Community Caregiving Network Rent Assistance and Emerg. Shelter $26,000 $23,500 $23,500 $23,500 15 Sound Mental Health PATH $17,000 $0 $0 $0 16 Multi-Service Center Emergency Feeding Program $15,000 $0 $8,002 $15,000 $10,000 17 Emergency Feeding Program of Sea-KC Emergency Feeding Program $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 18 Hospitality House Homeless Women's Shelter $15,000 $0 $0 $0 19 Feminist Women's Health Center Reproductive Health Care for Low-Income Women $4,800 $0 $0 $0 20 Washington Poison Center Emergency Services $7,920 $0 $0 $0 21 Cornerstone Medical Services Free medical services $42,000 $0 $0 $0 22 Multicultural Self-sufficiency Movement Evergreen Congregate Meals Program $5,000 $0 $0 $0 23 BAS Foundation Food Crisis Line $7,500 $0 $0 $0 Total Strategy #1 $465,147 $207,500 $18,029 $252,000 $226,000 $5,000 (Must be at least 37% of all fundingJ HSC 2013-2014 Final Funding Recommendation (8/1/12) Strategy #2 Agencies HSC 2013-2014 Amount Amount (Support Programs That Promote Individual and Strategy #2 Program Name Requested Funded in Funded in Funding HSC Funding HSGF Community Safety Throughout Federal Way) Funds 2012 HSGF 2012 CDBG Recomm. Recomm. Contingency $516,000 $430,000 Plan 1 Domestic Abuse Women's Network (DAWN) DV Transitional Housing $22,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 2 Crisis Clinic 24-Hour Crisis Line * See Note $10,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 3 Crisis Clinic King County 211 * See Note $15,000 $0 $9,000 $4,000 4 YWCA-Seattle-King-Snohomish Children's Domestic Violence Services $11,000 $6,500 $6,500 $0 5 Domestic Abuse Women's Network (DAWN) Community Advocacy Program $7,700 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 6 YWCA-Seattle-King-Snohomish Domestic Violence Services $20,000 $0 $5,000 $0 7 King County Sexual Assault Resource Center Comprehensive Sexual Assault Svcs $30,900 $30,000 $25,000 $25,000 8 Crisis Clinic Teen Link * See Note $5,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 9 Ukrainian Community Center Crisis Family Intervention Program $15,000 $0 $0 $0 10 Coord. Comm. Response Against DV CCRDV $15,000 $0 $0 $0 Total Strategy #2: $151,600 $67,500 $0 $76,500 $60,000 $0 *NOTE: Staff recommendation is to combine all three Crisis Clinic requests under 1 contract HSC 2013-2014 Final Funding Recommendation (8/1/12) 2013-2014 Amount Amount HSC Strategy #3 Agencies: Address the Service Needs of Funding HSC Funding 5 ecial Needs Grou s to Full Partici ate in the Strategy #3 Program Name Requested Funded in Funded in p p Y p Funds 2012 HSGF 2012 CDBG Recomm. Recomm. Contingency Community $516,000 $430,000 Plan 1 Senior Services of Seattle-King County Volunteer Transportation $9,477 $10,000 $10,000 $7,500 2 Orion Industries Employment Services $21,000 $0 $15,709 $0 $0 $15,000 3 Catholic Community Services Volunteer Chore Services $9,000 $8,000 $9,000 $8,000 4 Birth to Three Developmental Center Family Services Program $38,858 $22,000 $0 $0 5 King County Bar Foundation Pro Bono Services $10,000 $7,500 $6,500 $0 6 Senior Services of Seattle-King County Meals on Wheels $10,300 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 7 Jewish Family Service Refugee and Immigrant Service Centers $7,050 $6,500 $6,500 $0 8 Sound Mental Health Low Income Counseling $7,000 $0 $0 $0 9 Elder and Adult Day Services Elder and Adult Day Services $3,000 $0 $0 $0 10 Multi-Service Center Education $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 11 Highline Community College StartZone Volunteer Income Tax Assis. Prog. $7,000 $0 $0 $0 12 City of Federal Way Federal Way Recreation Inclusion Program $35,000 $0 $22,807 $0 $0 13 WA Women's Employment & Education (WWEE) REACH Plus $10,000 $10,000 $7,000 $7,000 14 Bridge Disability Ministries Mobility $3,000 $0 $0 $0 15 Lutheran Community Services Northwest Angle Lake Family Resource Center $5,000 $0 $0 $0 16 South King Council on Human Services (SKCHS) Capacity Building Project $10,000 $7,500 $0 $0 $7,500 17 Cares of Washington Economic self-sufficiency $4,200 $0 $0 $0 18 Valley Cities Counseling & Consultation (VCCC) Community Education and Resource Center $48,000 $0 $0 $0 19 KWA KWA Case Management $33,000 $0 $0 $0 20 Ukrainian Community Center of WA RURAP (Russian-Ukrainian Refugee Assis. Prog.) $15,000 $0 $0 $0 21 New Connections of South King County Steps Up-Poverty Reduction $1,821 $0 $0 $0 22 Federal Way Senior Center Senior Nutrition $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 23 Federal Way Senior Center Adult Day Care $15,432 $14,842 $0 $0 24 ABSOLUTE Ministries Housing for Recovery $5,000 $0 $0 $0 Total Strategy #3: $338,138 $111,500 $53,358 $69,000 $52,500 $22,500 HSC 2013-2014 Final Funding Recommendation (8/1/12) HSC Strate #4 A encies: Provide a Su ortive Amount Amount BY 6 ( pp 2013-2014 Funding HSCFunding Environment & Services for Low-Income Families with Strategy #4 Program Name Requested Funded in Funded in Recomm. Recomm. Contingency Children) Funds z012 HSGf 2012 CDBG $516,000 $430,000 Plan 1 Boys & Girls Clubs of King County FW Boys & Girls Club & EX3 Teen Center $20,000 $10,000 $15,000 $10,000 2 Valley Cities Counseling & Consultation (VCCC) Child and Youth Mental Health Services $42,000 $40,000 $40,000 $35,000 3 Communities In Schools of Federal Way School Outreach Coordination $15,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 4 Institute for Family Development PACT (Parents and Children Together) $18,982 $3,000 $15,078 $3,000 $3,000 5 Communities In Schools of Federal Way Mentoring Program $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $7,500 6 Sound Mental Health Children's Community Services $10,625 $0 $0 $0 7 Kent Youth and Family Services Clinical Programs for Youth $15,000 $12,000 $12,000 $7,500 8 Dynamic Partners Children with Special Needs $13,500 $10,000 $10,000 $5,000 9 Valley Cities Counseling & Consultation (VCCC) Federal Way Youth Development * See Note $12,000 $5,500 $5,000 $5,000 10 Children's Home Society of WA Parent-Child Home Program $15,000 $0 $0 $0 11 Children's Home Society of WA Strengthening Children & Families $10,000 $7,000 $0 $0 $7,500 12 Consejo Counseling & Referral Villa Esperanza Youth Program $20,000 $0 $0 $0 13 Auburn Youth Resources Substance Abuse Treatment $8,500 $0 $8,500 $8,500 14 Sound Mental Health Safe & Sound Visitation $12,000 $5,000 $0 $0 15 Valley Cities Counseling & Consultation (VCCC) Girls Circle * See Note $13,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $5,000 15 Society of Counsel Representing Accused Persons Raising Our Youth As Leaders (ROYAL) $20,000 $0 $0 $0 17 Pediatric Interim Care Center Interim Care of Drug-Exposed Infants $2,500 $0 $0 $0 18 Open Doors for Multicultural Families Multicultural Family Empowerment Prog. $14,000 $0 $0 $0 19 Pregnancy Aid of South King County Pregnancy Aid $3,000 $0 $0 $0 *NOTE: Combine Girl's Circle & Youth Dev. in 1 contrect Total Strategy #4: $275,107 $117,500 $15,078 $118,500 $91,500 $12,500 Grand Total: $1,129,991 $504,000 $86,465 $516,000 $430,000 $40,000 Human Services Commission Final Recommendation 08/20/12 2013-2014 HSGF Strategy #1 Agencies Su ort Basic Human Services Needs Amount Amount CDBG 2013- HSGF Funding HSGF Funding HSGF ( PP Strategy #1 Program Name 2013-2014 Funded in Funded in 2014 Funding Recomm. Recomm. Contingency Through Funding of Emergency Services) Requested Funds 2012 HSGF 2012 CDBG Recomm. $516,000 $430,000 Plan 1 BAS Foundation Food Crisis Line $7,500 $0 $0 $0 2 Catholic Community Services Emergency Assistance Program $20,000 $13,500 $13,500 $13,500 3 Catholic Community Services Reach Out Winter Response Shelter $35,000 $20,000 $25,000 $20,000 4 Child Care Resources Homeless Child Care Program $6,677 $6,500 $0 $0 5 Cornerstone Medical Services Free medical services $42,000 $0 $0 $0 6 Emergency Feeding Program of Seattle-KC Emergency Feeding Program $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 7 Federel Way Community Caregiving Network Rent Assistance and Emergency Shelter $26,000 $23,500 $23,500 523,500 8 Feminist Women's Health Center Reproductive Health Care for Low-Income Wo $4,800 $0 $0 $0 9 FUSION Transitional Housing Program $15,000 $10,000 $15,000 $13,500 10 HealthPoint Primary Medical Care $37,000 $10,000 $15,000 $10,000 11 HealthPoint Primary Dental Care $31,000 $15,900 $10,027 $15,000 $15,900 $15,900 12 Hospitality House Homeless Women's Shelter $15,000 $0 $0 $0 13 Kent Youth and Family Services Watson Manor Transitional Housing $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 14 Multiculturel Self-sufficiency Movement Evergreen Congregate Meals Program $5,000 $0 $0 $0 15 Multi-Service Center Food & Clothing Bank $50,000 $35,100 $36,100 $33,600 16 Multi-Service Center Emergency Shelter & Transitional Housing $45,000 $38,000 $38,000 $36,000 17 Multi-Service Center Rent & Emergency Assistance $30,000 $0 $20,000 $15,000 18 Multi-Service Center Emergency Feeding Program $15,000 $0 $8,002 $16,500 $10,000 19 Seattle-KC Department of Public Health South King County Mobile Medical Program $15,250 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 20 Sound Mental Health PATH $17,000 $0 $0 $0 21 St Vincent de Paul Emergency Human Services $26,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 22 Washington Poison Center Emergency Services $7,920 $0 $0 $0 23 YWCA-Seattle-King-Snohomish Emergency Housing Program $4,000 $0 $0 $0 TotalStretegy#1 $465,147 $207,500 $18,029 $15,000 $253,500 $226,000 $5,000 (Must be at least 37% of oll Junding) Human Services Commission Final Recommendation 08/20/12 2013-2014 HSGF Strategy #2 Agencies (Support Programs That Promote Individual and Strategy #2 Program Name Amount Amount CDBG 2013- HSGF Funding HSGF Funding HSGF Community Safety Throughout Federal Way) 2013-2014 Funded in Funded in 2014 Funding Recomm. Recomm. Contingency Requested Funds 2012 HSGF 2012 CDBG Recomm. $516,000 $430,000 Plan 1 Coord. Comm. Response Against Domestic Violence CCRDV $15,000 $0 $0 $0 2 Crisis Clinic 24-Hour Crisis Line * See Note $10,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 3 Crisis Clinic King County 211 * See Note $15,000 $0 $9,000 $4,000 4 Crisis Clinic Teen Link * See Note $5,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 5 Domestic Abuse Women's Network (DAWN) DV Transitional Housing $22,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 6 Domestic Abuse Women's Network (DAWN) Community Advocacy Program $7,700 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 7 King County Sexual Assault Resource Ctr (KCSARC) Comprehensive Sexual Assault Services $30,900 $30,000 $25,000 $25,000 8 Ukrainian Community Center Crisis Family Intervention Program $15,000 $0 $0 $0 9 YWCA-Seattle-King-Snohomish Children's DV Services **See Note $11,000 $6,500 $6,500 $0 10 YWCA-Seattle-King-Snohomish Domestic Violence Services **See Note $20,000 $0 $5,000 SO *NO7E: Combine all Crisis Clinic requests in 1 contrect Total Strategy #2: $151,600 $67,500 $0 $0 $76,500 $60,000 $0 *'NOTE: Combine both YWCA requests in 1 contract Human Services Commission Final Recommendation 08/20/12 2013-2014 HSGF Strategy tt3 Agencies (Continue to Develop a Comprehensive Human Services $trategy M3 Program Name Amount Amount CDBG 2013- HSGF Funding HSGF Funding HSGF Network & Address the Service Needs of Special Needs 2013-2014 Funded in Funded in 2014 Funding Recomm. Recomm. Contingency Groups to Fully Participate in the Community) Requested Funds 2012 HSGF 2012 CDBG Recomm. $516,000 $430,000 Plan 1 ABSOLUTE Ministries Housing for Recovery $5,000 $0 $0 $0 2 Birth to Three Developmental Center Family Services Program $38,858 $22,000 $22,000 $0 $0 3 Bridge Disability Ministries Mobility $3,000 $0 $0 $0 4 Cares of Washington Economic self-sufficiency $4,200 $0 50 $0 5 Catholic Community Services Volunteer Chore Services $9,000 $8,000 $9,000 $8,000 6 City of Federal Way Parks Department Federal Way Recreation Inclusion Program $35,000 $0 $22,807 $24,465 $0 $0 7 Elder and Adult Day Services Elder and Adult Day Services $3,000 $0 $0 $0 8 Federel Way Senior Center Senior Nutrition $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 9 Federal Way Senior Center Adult Day Care $15,432 $14,842 $0 $0 10 Highline Community College StartZone Volunteer Income Tax Assis. Prog. $7,000 $0 $0 $0 11 Jewish Family Service Refugee and Immigrant Service Centers $7,050 $6,500 $6,500 $0 12 King County Bar Foundation Pro Bono Services $10,000 $7,500 $5,000 $0 13 KWA KWA Case Management $33,000 $0 $0 $0 14 Lutheren Community Services Northwest Angle Lake Family Resource Center $5,000 $0 $0 $0 15 Multi-Service Center Education $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 16 New Connections of South King County Steps Up-Poverty Reduction $1,821 $0 $0 $0 17 Orion Industries Employment Services $21,000 $0 $15,709 $0 $0 $15,000 18 Senior Services of Seattle-King County Volunteer Transportation $9,477 $10,000 $10,000 $7,500 19 Senior Services of Seattle-King County Meals on Wheels $10,300 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 20 Sound Mental Health Low Income Counseling $7,000 $0 $0 $0 21 South King Council on Human Services (SKCHS) Capacity Building Project $10,000 $7,500 $0 $0 $7,500 22 Ukreinian Community Center of WA RURAP (Russian-Ukrainian Refugee Assis. Prog. $15,000 $0 $0 $0 23 Valley Cities Counseling & Consultation (VCCC) Community Education and Resource Center $48,000 $0 $0 $0 24 WA Women's Employment & Education (WWEE) REACH Plus $10,000 $10,000 $7,000 $7,000 Total Stretegy #3: $338,138 $111,500 $53,358 $56,465 $67,500 $52,500 $22,500 Human Services Commission Final Recommendation 08/20/12 2013-2014 HSGF Stretegy #4 Agencies (Provide a Supportive Environment & Services Strategy #4 Program Name Amount Amount CDBG 2013- HSGF Funding HSGF Funding HSGF for Low-Income Families with Children) 2013-2014 Funded in Funded in 2014 Funding Recomm. Recomm. Contingency Requested Funds 2012 HSGF 2012 CDBG Recomm. $516,000 $430,000 Plan 1 Auburn Youth Resources Substance Abuse Treatment $8,500 $0 $8,500 $8,500 2 Boys & Girls Clubs of King County FW Boys & Girls Club & EX3 Teen Center $20,000 $10,000 $15,000 $10,000 3 Children's Home Society of WA Strengthening Children & Families $10,000 $7,000 $0 $0 $7,500 4 Children's Home Society of WA Parent-Child Home Program $15,000 $0 $0 $0 5 Communities In Schools of Federal Way School Outreach Coordination $15,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 6 Communities In Schools of Federal Way Mentoring Program $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $7,500 7 Consejo Counseling & Referrel Villa Esperanza Youth Program $20,000 $0 $0 $0 8 Dynamic Partners Children with Special Needs $13,500 $10,000 $10,000 $5,000 9 Institute for Family Development PACT (Parents and Children Together) $18,982 $3,000 $15,078 $15,000 $3,000 $3,000 10 Kent Youth and Family Services Clinical Programs for Youth $15,000 $12,000 $12,000 $7,500 il Open Doors for Multicultural Families Multicultural Family Empowerment Program 514,000 $0 $0 SO 12 Pediatric Interim Care Center Interim Care of Drug-Exposed Infants $2,500 $0 $0 $0 13 Pregnancy Aid of South King County Pregnancy Aid $3,000 $0 $0 $0 14 Soc. of Counsel Represent. Accused Persons Raising Our Youth As Leaders (ROYAL) 520,000 $0 $0 $0 15 Sound Mental Health Children's Community Services $10,625 $0 $0 $0 16 Sound Mental Health Safe & Sound Visitation $12,000 $5,000 $0 $0 17 Valley Cities Counseling & Consultation Child and Youth Mental Health Services $42,000 $40,000 $40,000 $35,000 18 Valley Cities Counseling & Consultation Federal Way Youth Development * See Note $12,000 $5,500 $5,000 $5,000 19 Valley Cities Counseling & Consultation Girls Circle * See Note $13,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $5,000 TotalStretegy#4: $275,107 $117,500 $15,078 $15,000 $118,500 $91,500 $12,500 'NOTE: Combine Girl's Circle & Youth Dev. in 1 contract Grand Total: $1,219,991 $504,000 $86,465 $86,465 $516,000 $430,000 $40,000 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 4, 2012 ITEM #:0_ ............................................................................................................................................................... ............................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... .................................... . . . . . . . . . . . .................... . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: 2013 -2014 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council approve the Human Services Commission's funding recommendations for the 2013 -2014 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Public Services grants and Planning & Administration budget? COMMITTEE: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety MEETING DATE: August 14, 2012 CATEGORY: Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT.BY: Jay Bennett, Community Services Manager DEPT: Community & Economic Development Services ............................................................................. ...._.......................... --.............................................-_.........................................................._........ .........................._._.. . .- .- .... -. _. .. .... ........ _. -_.... Attachments: 2013 Conditions of Funding for Public Services Projects Background As a direct entitlement city, Federal Way receives its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) dollars directly from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Of the total entitlement amount, the City can allocate up to 15 percent to Public Services projects and up to 20 percent to Planning & Administration activities. CDBG Public Services Program funding is for eligible activities that provide services to low- and moderate - income residents of the City and includes services such as emergency shelters, medical services, food banks, senior center programs, etc. Human Services Commission Process (HSC): CDBG Public Services applications were received through a Notice of Funds Available process, which closed April 23, 2012. Applicants utilized the Sharel app online application system to apply for grants. Applications were reviewed and rated by City staff and members of the HSC and were discussed in -depth at the June 21st retreat. The Commission approved a preliminary funding recommendation for both Public Services and Planning & Administration at their July 16 meeting. The City's exact 2013 CDBG budget cannot be determined until the U.S. Congress approves the federal budget sometime next year. Therefore, the Human Services Commission based its recommendation on the the 2012 entitlement grant award: $86,465 for Public Services and $115,290 for Planning & Administration. Any necessary budgetary adjustments to those amounts will be reviewed by the Commission next year. On August 1st, the HSC held a public hearing on their proposed funding recommendation. After receiving public comment, the Commission approved their final funding recommendation for the 2013 -2014 CDBG Public Services grants and the City's Planning & Administration budget. The Commission is recommending the following allocations for the 2013 -2014 CDBG Public Services grants: Agency Program 2013 Grant Amount 2014 Grant Amount Birth to Three Family Services Program $22,000 $22,000 City of Federal Way Parks Dept. Inclusion Program $24,465 $24,465 HealthPoint Primary Dental Care $15,000 $15,000 Institute for Family Development Parents & Children Together $15,000 $15,000 Multi- Service Center Education Program $10,000 $10,000 Total: $86,465 * 2014 allocations are contingent on the 2014 CDBG budget and satisfactory performance of the applicant's 2013 contract. The Commission also recommends that the full 20 percent of the 2013 entitlement grant award ($115,290) be allocated to the Planning & Administration budget to administer the CDBG program. Individual applicant conditions of funding were also approved and recommended by the Commission and are attached for your review. Options: 1. Approve the Human Services Commission's funding recommendation for the 2013 -2014 CDBG Public Services grants, the Planning & Administration budget, and the Conditions of Funding. 2. Direct staff to make changes to the Human Services Commission's funding recommendation for the 2013- 2014 CDBG Public Services grants awards and/or the City's CDBG Planning & Administration budget. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 MAYOR APPROVAL: 1� .� DIRECTOR APPROVAL: / Commi a Co l _ V ommittee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the Human Services Commission's funding recommendation for the 2013 -2014 CDBG Public Service grants, the Planning & Administration budget and the Conditions of Funding to the full Council September 4, 2012 consent agenda for approval. PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the Human Services Commission's funding recommendation for the 2013 -2014 CDBG Public Service grants, the Planning & Administration budget and the Conditions of Funding" COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED - 08/12/2010 COUNCIL BILL # Is' reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # 2013 CDBG ALLOCATIONS PROCESS Funding Conditions for Public Service Projects All 2013 CDBG Projects 1. All CDBG projects are subject to the federal environmental review requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as of the date of submittal of application. An environmental review of Federal Way - awarded CDBG projects must be completed before contracts will be executed. Costs of the NEPA review will be charged to the CDBG project. 2. All projects must comply with Community Development Block Grant Program Regulations (24 CFR Part 570) and applicable policies as outlined in the City of Federal Way Consolidated Plan Plan for 2012 -2016. 3. All CDBG projects shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and City laws including, without limitation, all City codes, ordinances, resolutions, standards and policies, as now exist or hereafter adopted or amended including land use and /or building permit requirements and processes. All 2013 CDBG Public Service Projects 1. If funded, units of service may be adjusted based upon the amount of funding and refinement of the program service and unit costs definitions. A line item budget will be negotiated with the subrecipient. 2. 2014 awards are contingent upon successful completion of each agency's 2013 CDBG Contract for public service, if applicable. 3. 2013 awards will be continued in 2014 subject to availability of funds and agency performance in 2013. The CDBG Contingency Plan will be implemented should funding increase or decrease. The following specific condition(s) address concerns that Staff and the Commission discussed as they reviewed the applications. HealthPoint — Primary Dental Program a) Federal Way Dental Access Program funding is contingent upon the Federal Way Dental Access Program receiving funding from Federal Way's 2013 Human Services General Fund for a minimum of $15,900. b) Funds awarded, as part of Federal Way's 2013 CDBG program, must be used to provide additional units of service above that provided by a 2013 Federal Way Human Services General Fund award. Multi- Service Center — Education Program No specific conditions. Institute for Family Development— PACT (Parents and Children Together) a) Institute for Family Development - PACT funding is contingent upon the PACT Program receiving funding for Federal Way's 2013 Human Services General Fund for a minimum of $3,000. b) Funds awarded, as part of Federal Way's 2013 CDBG program, must be used to provide additional-units of service above that provided by Federal Way 2013 Human Services General Fund award. Birth to Three Development Center — Family Services Program No specific conditions. Federal Way Parks Department — Inclusion Program No specific conditions. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 4, 2012 ITEM #: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Residential Open Space in the City Center -Core and City Center -Frame Zoning Districts POLICY QUESTION: Should the City amend the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) to reduce the minimum residential open space requirement from 200 square feet to 100 square feet per unit, add design standards for required open space, and adopt an optional fee -in -lieu standard for up to 50% of the open space requirement? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation MEETING DATE: August 6, 2012 CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ® Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Senior Planner, Janet Shull, AICP DEPT: Community and Economic Development Background: The Planning Commission Work Program identified this particular amendment to the FWRC as a "high priority" item. The primary purpose of the proposed code amendment is to reduce the overall open space requirement for residential development in the City Center zoning districts to a level that is more conducive to higher intensity, mixed use development. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on July 18, 2012 at the close of which they recommended to the council approval of the staff recommendation to amend the City Center -Core and City Center -Frame open space requirements. Attachments: 1) Draft Adoption Ordinance; 2) Staff Report to the Planning Commission with Exhibits A -F; 3) Draft Minutes of the July 18, 2012, Planning Commission Public Hearing. Options Considered: 1) Adopt the Mayor's recommendation as shown in the Draft Adoption Ordinance; 2) Adopt the Mayor's recommendation as further amended by the City Council; 3 Do not adopt the Mayor's recommendation . MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends adoption of the proposed amendments as written in the Draft Adoption Ordinance. R n MAYOR APPROVAL: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A t r � I Wli Committee Chair PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION(S): DIRECTOR APPROVAL: Committee Member 1sT READING OF ORDINANCE (SEPTEMBER 4, 2012): 'Y move to forward the proposed ordinance to the September 18 meeting for second reading and enactment. 2ND READING OF ORDINANCE (SEPTEMBER 18,2012): "I move approval of the proposed ordinance." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED 1sT reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED— 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION # K:\2012 Code Amendments\Residential Open space in CC distsricts \City Council\Agenda Bill.doc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to open space standards for multi -unit housing in the City Center - Core and City Center -Frame zoning districts; amending FWRC 19.05.150, 19.100.070, 19.115, 19.225.070 and 19.230.060 (Amending Ordinance Nos. 10-658, 09 -610, 09 -593, 08 -585, 08 -583, 07 -554, 06 -542, 06 -515, 02 -424, 97 -291, 96 -270, 93 -170, 90 -43) WHEREAS, the City recognizes the need to periodically modify Title 19 of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC), "Zoning and Development Code," in order to conform to state and federal law, codify administrative practices, clarify and update zoning regulations as deemed necessary, and improve the efficiency of the regulations and the development review process; and WHEREAS, this ordinance, containing amendments to development regulations and the text of Title 19 FWRC, has complied with Process VI review, chapter 19.80 FWRC, pursuant to chapter 19.35 FWRC; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the City Council to amend the FWRC related to open space for multi -unit housing in the City Center; and WHEREAS, recent proposals for multi -unit, mixed use development have had difficulty meeting the current open space standards; and WHEREAS, reducing the minimum requirement for open space will help encourage urban- scale mixed use development; and WHEREAS, design guidelines will address the quality of the required open space; and WHEREAS, a fee -in -lieu option provides for additional flexibility in meeting open space requirements; and Ordinance No. 12- Page 1 of 17 Rev 1 /10 LU WHEREAS, an Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was properly issued for the Proposal on July 6, 2012, and no comments or appeals were received and the DNS was finalized on August 3, 2012; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on these code amendments on July 18, 2012, and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Federal Way makes the following findings with respect to the proposed amendments. (a) These code amendments are in the best interest of the residents of the City and will benefit the City as a whole because reducing the current open space standard to an amount that is more in line with urban, mixed use development will help encourage the type of development envisioned for the city center. (b) These code amendments comply with Chapter 36.70A RCW, Growth Management. (c) These code amendments are consistent with the intent and purpose of Title 19 FWRC and will implement and are consistent with the applicable provisions of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP). (d) These code amendments bear a substantial relationship to, and will protect and not adversely affect, the public health, safety, and welfare. (e) These code amendments have followed the proper procedure required under the FWRC. Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to chapter 19.80 FWRC and chapter 19.35 FWRC, and based upon the recitals and the findings set forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council Ordinance No. 12- Page 2 of 17 Rev 1 /10 LU makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the adoption of the proposed amendments: (a) The proposed FWRC amendments are consistent with, and substantially implement, the following FWCP goals and policies: EDG4 The City will channel further residential growth into existing multi - family and commercial -zoned areas, with a particular goal of encouraging residential development in the City Center. EDP6 The City will develop zoning, permitting, and potential financial incentives that encourage prioritized development consistent with comprehensive and subarea plans and orderly phased growth. EDP14 The City will continue to utilize design guidelines to enhance the urban environment to retain and attract businesses and residents. HP8 Consider the economic impact of all development regulations on the cost of housing. HG3 Develop a Comprehensive Plan and zoning code that provide flexibility to produce innovative housing solutions, do not burden the cost of housing development and maintenance, and diversify the range of housing types available in the City. CCG7 Encourage housing opportunities in mixed residential/commercial settings. Promote housing opportunities close to employment. CCG13 Focus new growth, with resultant increasing demands for infrastructure and transportation in the City Center, specifically the core area. Allow for higher intensity uses for efficient use of land. Ordinance No. 12- Page 3 of 17 Rev 1110 LU CCP3 Continue to support land use regulations that allow the higher intensity development expected over the next 15 to 30 years. CCP8 Provide incentives to encourage residential development in the City Center core area. CCP10 Continue to develop land use regulations that encourage the frame area to accommodate higher - density residential uses accompanied by residentially oriented retail and service uses. (b)The proposed FWRC text amendments bear a relationship to the public health, safety, and welfare because the text amendments retain the requirement for on -site open space for multi -unit development within the city center. While the amount of open space is proposed to be reduced, this reduction better relates to the type of residential units that will likely be developed within the urban core setting. (c) The proposed FWRC text amendments are in the best interest of the residents of the City because the reduction in on -site open space required for multi -unit housing in the city center will remove an existing barrier to construction of residential development within the city center, thereby more readily accommodating future population growth in the city center. Additional residents in the city center will help support the local businesses and cultural attractions that the city wants to attract and retain. Section 3. FWRC 19.225.070 is hereby amended to read as follows: Ordinance No. 12- Page 4 of 17 Rev 1 /10 LU 19.225.070 Multi -unit housing. The following uses shall be permitted in the citv center core WC-C) zone subiect to the repaulations and notes set forth in this section: Ordinance No. 12- Page 5 of 17 Rev I /10 LU USE ZONE CHART Z DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use ... THEN, across for REGULATIONS 0 Minimums c ti ZONE Required Yards Y CC -C ,� USE a s a° w w x a s SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES Multi -unit Process II None Multi-unit 70 ft. or Multi-unit 1. The city may, using process III, modify required yard, height, lot coverage, and other site design and dimensional housing housing: same as 200 -ft. housing: requirements for a proposed development that meets the following criteria: (stacked Possible these regulations 1.7 per unit a. The proposed development will be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan policies for this zone; and dwelling Process for ground floor See notes b. The proposed development will be consistent with the applicable design guidelines; and units) III use 1 and 5 See note 16 c. The street, utilities, and other infrastructure in the area are adequate to support the proposed development. Senior citizen or 2. Chapter 19.265 FWRC contains regulations regarding home occupations and other accessories, facilities and activities Senior citizen See note special needs Mixed use associated with this use. or special 1 housing: development, 3. No setback is required adjacent to rights -of -way for senior citizen and special needs housing, when publicly visible needs senior citizen streetscape amenities, as defined in Chapter 19.444 05,190 FWRC, are located along the right -of -way; the siting and 20 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. housing and special design of which shall be approved by the director. See notes 1, 3, (stacked and 9 needs 4. Multi -unit housing and accessory residential uses may be located on the ground floor of a structure only as follows: (a) dwelling housing: ground level space that spans at least 800% of the length of the principal commercial fagade, as determined by the units) Determined director, is occupied with one or more other uses(s) allo%ed in this zone; and (b) ground level space that spans at least on a case -by- 60% of the length of all other street-facing facades is occupied with one or more other use(s) allowed in this zone; and case basis (c) all ground level nonresidential space(s) have a minimum floor -to- ceiling height of 13 ft. and an average depth of 30 ft., but in no case less than 15 ft. However, stacked senior citizen or special needs housing may stand alone. 5. Building height may be increased from the permitted outright height of 70 ft. to 200 ft. in exchange for providing publicly visible streetscape amenities, as defined in Chapter 19. 115 19.05.190 FWRC, along the right -of -way; the siting and design of which shall be approved by the director. 6. The subject property must provide moreatienal usable open space in a total amount equal to at least 290 100 sq. ft. per dwelling unit and may include private gpen spaces such as yards, patios, and balconies, as well as common open spaces areas such as 1p azas• playgrounds, recreation rooms, rooftop terraces, p_ patches, pools, active lobbies, and atriums. Any . fOf housing be deteffnined en a sase by case basis A VM114S Sffliff OWNR of speeial needs will minimum of 25% of the usable open space provided must be common open space All eligible usable open space shal l also meet the requirements specified in FWRC 19.115.115. A fee -in -lieu payment may be utilized for up to 50% of the usable open space as specified in FWRC 19.115.115. (Continued) Process I, II, III and IV are described in For other information about parking and parking areas, see Chapter 19.130 FWRC. Chapter 19.55 FWRC, Chapter 19.60 FWRC, Chapter 19.65 FWRC, For details of what may exceed this height limit, see FWRC 19.110.050 et seq. Chapter 19.70 FWRC respectively. For details regarding required yards, see FWRC 19.125.160 et seq. Ordinance No. 12- Page 5 of 17 Rev I /10 LU 19.225.070 Multi -unit housing. (Continued) Ordinance No. 12- Page 6 of 17 Rev 1 /10 LU USE ZONE CHART z DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use ... THEN, across for REGULATIONS p Minimums Re aired Yards F ZONE CC -C 5 2 1 SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES USE a P. 7. No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requirements, i.e., required buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. 8. For community design guidelines that apply to the project; see Chapter 19.115 FWRC. 9. For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Chapter 19.125 FWRC. 10. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Chapter 19.140 FWRC. 11. Refer to Chapter 19.265 FWRC to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. 12. For provisions that relate to the keeping of animals, see Chapter 19.260 FWRC. 13. Single -story buildings may not exceed a trial ground floor area of 16,000 gross sq. ft., unless approved under the provisions of FWRC 19.110.080, or approved by the director for minor additions such as entry structures, lobbies, seating or dining areas, bay windows, and similar features; provided that such addition(s) shall not exceed 1,000 sq. ft. per building in any one consecutive 12 -month period. 14. No more than 16,000 sq. ft. of new single -story construction may occur on a subject property, excluding increases approved under the provisions of FWRC 19.110.080 and minor additions approved by the director under note 13. 15. Multiple -story buildings are not subject to notes 13 and 14; provided that each floor contains at least 75% of the gross sq. ft. of the floor below it and contains a principal use(s) permitted in this zone. 16. Required parking may be reduced under the provisions of FWRC 19.130.020(3)(a), (b), (c), and (d). Process I, II, III and IV are described in For other information about parking and parking areas, see Chapter 19.130 FWRC. Chapter 19.55 FWRC, Chapter 19.60 FWRC, Chapter 19.65 FWRC, For details of what may exceed this height limit see FWRC 19.110.050 et seq. Chapter 19.70 FWRC respectively. For details regarding required yards, see FWRC 19.125.160 et seq. Ordinance No. 12- Page 6 of 17 Rev 1 /10 LU Section 4. FWRC 19.230.060 is hereby amended to read as follows: 19.230.060 Multi -unit housing. The following uses shall be permitted in the city center frame WC-17) zone subiect to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: Ordinance No. 12- Page 7 of 17 Rev 1 /10 LU USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use... THEN, across for REGULATIONS vs Minimums p ZONE Required Yards o �3 o� 0. CC -F ti USE a x w rx x a SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES Multi -unit Process II None Multi -unit housing: 70 ft. Multi -unit 1. The city may, using process III, modify required height, yard, landscape and other site design and dimensional requirements for a housing same as these or housing: proposed development that meets the following criteria: (stacked Possible requirements for 85 ft. 1.7 per unit a. The proposed development will be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan policies for this zone; and dwelling units) Process ground floor use b. The proposed development will be consistent with the applicable design guidelines; and III See notes See note 17 c. The street utilities and other infrastructure in the area are adequate to support the proposed development. Senior citizen or 2. Multi-unit housing and accessory residential uses may be located on the ground floor of a structure only as follows: (a) ground level Senior citizen special needs 1, 4, and space that spans at least 60 percent of the length of the principal commercial fagade, as determined by the director, is occupied with one and special See note housing: 5 Mixed use or more other uses(s) allowed in this zone; and (b) ground level space that spans at least 40 percent of the length of all other street - facing needs housing 1 development, facades is occupied with one or more other use(s) allowed in this zone; and (c) all ground level nonresidential space(s) have a minimum 20 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. (stacked senior citizen floor -to- ceiling height of 13 ft. and an average depth of 30 ft., but in no case less than 15 ft. Stacked senior citizen or special needs See notes 1, 5, 8, and dwelling units) 10 and special housing may stand alone. needs 3. FWRC 19.265.010 et. seq., contains regulations regarding home occupations and other accessories, facilities and activities associated housing: with this use. 4. Building height may be increased from the permitted outright height of 70 ft. to 85 ft. in exchange for providing publicly visible Determined streetscape amenities, as defined in Chapter 19 11 c 19.05.190 FWRC, along the right -of -way; the siting and design of which shall be on a Case -by- approved by the director. case basis 5. Structures on property that adjoins a residential zone shall be set back a minimum of 20 ft. from the property line adjacent to the residential zone. The height of structures shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation when located between 20 ft. and 40 ft. from the adjacent residentially -zoned property line, and shall not exceed 40 ft. above average building elevation when located between 40 ft. and 100 ft. from such property line. 6. The subject property must provide resreatioaal su able open space in a total amount equal to at least 280 100 sq. ft. per dwelling unit and may include private oven spaces such as yards, patios, and balconies, as well as common open spaces areas such as plazas. playgrounds, recreation rooms, rooftop terraces, p- patches, pools, active lobbies, and atriums. basis. eitimen 9F speeial needs housing will he dateFmiaed An A- Paso by ease A minimum of 25% of the usable open space provided must be common open space All eligible usable open space shall also meet the requirements specified in FWRC 19.115.115. A fee -in -lieu option is available for up to 50% of the usable open space as specified in FWRC 19.115.115. Continued Process I, II, III and IV are described in For other information about parking and parking areas, Chapter 19.130 FWRC. Chapter 19.55 FWRC, Chapter 19.60 FWRC, Chapter 19.65 FWRC, For details of what may exceed this height limit, see FWRC 19.110.050 et seq. Chapter 19.70 FWRC respectively. For details regarding required yards, see FWRC 19.125.160 et seq. Ordinance No. 12- Page 7 of 17 Rev 1 /10 LU 19.230.060 Multi -unit housing. (Continued) The following uses shall be permitted in the city center frame (CC -F) zone subiect to the reeulations and notes set forth in this section: Ordinance No. 12- Page 8 of 17 Rev 1 /10 LU USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. THEN, across for REGULATIONS rn Minimums p c ZONE Req aired Yards P. CC -F a.'' VJ C N 4 USE a a �; a° w z x n a s SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES 7. No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requirements; i.e., buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. 8. No setback is required adjacent to rights -of -way for senior citizen and special needs housing, when publicly visible streetscape amenities, as defined in Chapter 19.115 FWRC, are located along the right -of -way; the siting and design of which shall be approved by the director. 9. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see FWRC 19.115 FWRC. 10. For landscaping requirements that apply for the project, see Chapter 19.125 FWRC. 11. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see FWRC 19.140 FWRC. 12. Refer to FWRC 19.265.010 et seq. to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. 13. For provisions that relate to the keeping of animals, see FWRC 19.260.010 et seq. 14. Single -story buildings may not exceed a total ground floor area of 16,000 gross sq. ft., unless approved under the provisions of FWRC 19.110.080, or approved by the director for minor additions such as entry structures, lobbies, seating or dining areas, bay windows, and similar features; provided that such addition(s) shall not exceed 1,000 sq. ft. per building in any one consecutive 12 -month period. 15. No more than 16,000 sq. ft. of new single -story construction may occur on a subject property, increases approved under the provisions of FWRC 19.110.080 and minor additions approved by the director under note 14, above. 16. Multiple -story buildings are not subject to notes 14 and 15, above; provided that each floor contains at least 75 percent of the gross sq. ft. of the floor below it and contains a principal use(s) permitted in this zone. 17. Required parking may be reduced under the provisions of FWRC 19.130.020(3)(a), (b), (c), and (d). Process I, II, III and IV are described in For other information about parking and parking areas, see Chapter 19.130 FWRC. Chapter 19.55 FWRC, Chapter 19.60 FWRC, Chapter 19.65 FWRC, For details of what may exceed this height limit, see FWRC 19.110.050 et seq. Chapter 19.70 FWRC respectively. For details regarding required yards, see FWRC 19.125.160 et seq. Ordinance No. 12- Page 8 of 17 Rev 1 /10 LU Section 5. FWRC 19.115 is hereby amended to add a new section to read as follows: 19.115.115 Design criteria for residential usable open space and fee -in -lieu option. The following guidelines apply to residential usable open space that is developed pursuant to FWRC 19.225.070 and 19.230.060. (1) COMMON OPEN SPACE: All common open space proposed under this section shall meet the definition of "open space, common" as set forth in this title and all of the following criteria: (a) In order to be credited toward total residential usable open space, common open space must be a minimum of 225 sq. ft. and have a minimum dimension of 15 ft. The inclusion of additional contiguous open space areas that have smaller dimensions but enhance the use and enjoyment of the overall larger space may be credited toward the overall minimum usable open space requirement subject to director approval. (b) Indoor common areas such as recreation/workout rooms, swimming pools, and gathering spaces that meet the criteria of this section may be counted as common open space subject to the criteria in this section. () The common open space shall be readily visible and accessible from structure(s) with entries to residential units. (d) The common open space shall not be located on asphalt or rg avel pavement, or be adjacent to unscreened parking lots chain -link fences or blank walls and may not be used for parking, loading, oading, or vehicular access. (e) Pedestrian access ways shall only be counted as common open space when the pedestrian path or walkway traverses a common open space that is 15 ft. or wider. (fl The common open space shall be sufficiently designed and appointed to serve as a major focal point and ag thering place Common open spaces shall include a significant number of pedestrian- oriented features furnishings and amenities typically found in plazas and recreational open space, such as seating or Ordinance No. 12- Page 9 of 17 Rev 1/10 Lu sitting walls lighting, weather protection special paving landscaping, and trash receptacles In addition the common open spaces should provide one or more significant visual or functional amenities such as a water feature fireplace and/or artwork and should allow for active uses such as physical exercise, children's p1gy area gathering area for group social events and p-patch or other gardening activity. (2) PRIVATE OPEN SPACE: In order to be credited toward total residential usable open space, private open space must be a minimum of 48 sq ft and have a minimum dimension of 6 ft. (3) PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE OPEN SPACE: Publicly accessible open spaces provided on site may be credited toward the minimum residential usable open space requirement as long as the open space is directly accessible to and available to residents for their use. Only the portion of the public open space directly accessible to and available to residents for their use may be credited toward the residential usable open space requirement. () FEE -IN-LIEU OPTION• A fee -in -lieu payment may be made to satisfy up to 50% of the residential usable open space requirement for the development of public parks and recreation improvements Fee -in -lieu acceptance shall be at the discretion of the Parks Director after consideration of the city's overall park plan and the quality, location and usability of the open space that would otherwise be provided on the project site If the city determines that afee -in -lieu is appropriate, a pa= ent of an equivalent fee -in -lieu of the required open space shall be made. The fee -in -lieu of open space shall be calculated based on the most recent assessed value of the subject property or an appraisal conducted by a state - certified real estate appraiser. If the applicant offers to pay fee in lieu of open space and if the city accepts the offer, the amount shall be determined based upon the square footage of open space that otherwise would have been required to be provided, multiplied by the then- current market value per square foot of the property. By choosing the fee -in -lieu option the applicant agrees that the city will not be restricted to using the fees in the park comprehensive planning area that the subject property falls within and that they may be used for park and recreation improvements in any of the park comprehensive planning areas that serve the City Center -Core and City Ordinance No. 12- Page 10 of 17 Rev UIOLU Center -Frame zoned areas. See also FWRC 19.100.070. Section 6. FWRC 19.100.070 is hereby amended to read as follows: 19.100.070 Timing of fee payments. Various sections of this Code require payment of fees to mitigate direct impacts of the development approval. Notwithstanding those fees eligible for deferment pursuant to subsections (1)(b)• (1 Xc), and (3)(b) of this section, the following describes when such fees shall be calculated and paid: (1) Open space fee -in -lieu. (a) As provided in FWRC 18.55.060 and 19.115.115, a A fee -in -lieu of open space may be made to satisfy open space requirements at the discretion of the parks director and shall be calculated and paid at the time of plat recording for residential land divisions or prior to building permit issuance for multifamily developments in the city center -core and city center -frame zoning_ districts, unless deferred as noted below. The fee shall be calculated based upon the square footage of open space which otherwise would have been required to be provided multiplied by the subject property's assessed or appraised value. (b) For those residential land divisions vested prior to July 2, 2015, open space fees -in -lieu may be deferred, but shall be paid no later than the closing of sale of each individual house or five years from deferment of the fee, whichever is earlier. Covenants prepared by the city shall be recorded at the applicant's expense on each lot at the time of plat recording to enforce payment of deferred fees. The fee shall be calculated at the time of plat recording and divided equally among all newly created lots. The fee shall be calculated based upon the square footage of open space which otherwise would have been required to be provided multiplied by the subject property's assessed or appraised value. As consideration for the ability to defer open space fee -in -lieu payments beyond plat recording, the applicant agrees to waive the right to interest and/or a refund if payment is not expended within five years of collection. (c) For multifamily developments in the city center -core and city center- frame, open space fees- in -lieu may be deferred, but shall be paid no later than the completion of construction and prior to receipt Ordinance No. 12- Page 11 of 17 Rev 1 /10 LU of certificate of occupancy/approval to occupy for each floor or each building if phased, or five years from the recording of the deferment covenants, whichever is earlier. Covenants prepared by the cijy shall be recorded at the applicant's expense, prior to building permit issuance, to enforce payment of deferred fees. The fee shall be calculated at the time of recording of the covenants and shall be divided equally among; all residential units within the project. The fee shall be calculated based upon the square footage of open space that otherwise would have been required to be provided multiplied by the subject property's assessed or appraised value. As consideration for the ability to defer open space fee -in -lieu pa ments beyond building permit issuance, the applicant agrees to waive the right to interest and/or a refund if payment is not expended within five years of collection. (2) Regional stormwater facility fee -in -lieu. Developments may be able to utilize stormwater detention in one of the city's regional stormwater facilities based on an area fee -in -lieu established by the city. Fees are used for construction cost recovery and shall be paid at the time of plat recording for residential land divisions and prior to building permit issuance for commercial and multifamily developments. (3) Transportation impactfee. Unless the use of an independent fee calculation has been approved, or unless a development agreement entered into pursuant to RCW 36.70B.170 provided otherwise, the fee shall be calculated and paid per the following: (a) For residential land divisions, fees shall be calculated and paid at the time of plat recording. For unplatted single - family residential lots, commercial and multifamily developments, fees shall be calculated based on the impact fee schedule in effect at the time a completed building permit application is filed and paid prior to permit issuance. For a change in use for which no building permit is required, the fee shall be calculated and paid based on the impact fee schedule in effect on the date of an approved change of use. Ordinance No. 12- Page 12 of 17 Rev 1/10 LU (b) For residential land divisions and unplatted single - family residential lots, the transportation impact fee may be deferred, but shall be paid no later than the closing of sale of each individual house. Covenants prepared by the city to enforce payment of the deferred fees shall be recorded at the applicant's expense on each lot at the time of plat recording for residential land divisions and prior to building permit issuance for unplatted single- family residential lots. The fee shall be calculated based on the impact fee schedule in effect on the date of payment of the impact fee. (Ord. No. 10 -658, § 6, 5- 18 -10) Section 7. FWRC 19.05.150 is hereby amended to read as follows: 19.05.150 O definitions. "Occupant" means a person that legally occupies a structure or property- "Office use " means a place of employment providing services other than production, distribution, sale or repair of goods or commodities, and includes but is not limited to: medical, dental or other health care; veterinary, accounting, legal, architectural, engineering, consulting or other similar professional services; management, administrative, secretarial, marketing, advertising, personnel or other similar personnel services; sales offices where no inventories or goods are available on the premises; real estate, insurance, travel agent, loan companies, brokerage or other similar services. The following uses are specifically excluded from the definition of "office ": banks, savings and loan companies and similar financial institutions. "Office zones " mean the PO, OP and CP -I zoning districts. "Official notification boards of the city" means the bulletin boards in the public areas of City Hall and other public locations as designated by city council. "On -site hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities " means facilities which treat and store hazardous wastes generated on the same property or geographically contiguous properties, which may be Ordinance No. 12- Page 13 of 17 Rev 1 /10 LU divided by public or private right -of -way if the entrance and exit between the properties is at a crossroads intersection and access is by crossing as opposed to going along the right -of -way. "Open house " means an event held at a specific location, that is open to the public, and where the event holder remains in attendance during the event. "Open record hearing" means a hearing that creates the city's record of decision for an application or appeal through testimony and submission of evidence and information, under procedures prescribed by the city's hearing examiner or the city council. An open record hearing may be held prior to the city's decision on an application, or as part of an appeal. "Open space" fneems „a not a ea by buildings, ad par-king ether- we a thfeugh means an area of land that is valued for natural processes and wildlife, for agricultural production, for active and passive recreation, and/or for providing other public benefits. In certain cases, open space may refer to both outdoor and indoor spaces that provide active or passive recreational amenities for a development's occupants or users. "Open space, common,” means open space which is normally utilized by the occupants of a building or Promm. "Open space, private," means eeee open space, the use of which is normally limited to the occupants of a single dwelling "Open space, public," means open space owned by a public agency and maintained by it for the use and enjoyment of the general public. "Ordinary high water mark" means, on lakes, streams and tidal waters, that mark found by examining the bed, banks, or shore and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil or land a character distinct from that of the abutting uplands with respect to vegetation. Where the ordinary high water mark cannot be found by mark, the ordinary high water mark shall be the line of mean higher high tide for salt water and the line of mean high water for fresh water. In any stream where neither mark nor mean high water can be Ordinance No. 12- Page 14 of 17 Rev 1/10 LU found, the channel bank shall be substituted. In braided channels and alluvial fans, the ordinary high water mark or substitute shall be located so as to include the entire stream feature. "Outdoor" means not contained within a building. "Outdoor storage " means any material or item (including vehicles), being stored for or awaiting sale, lease, processing or repair and not enclosed within a building. "Outdoor storage containers " means new or used prefabricated metal or steel enclosures used for the accessory storage of supplies, equipment, inventory, goods, commodities, or construction- related materials; or temporary offices for active construction sites; designed without an axle or wheels; and capable of being mounted on a chassis or bogie for movement by truck, trailer, railcar, or ship. This defmition includes, but is not limited to, cargo, shipping, and freight containers; and excludes typical residential accessory buildings or structures such as garages and storage sheds; garbage and recycling containers; containers mounted on a truck or in some stage of transport; structures used or designed to be used as living facilities, and portable moving containers as defined in this chapter. See FVWRC 19.125.180 and 19.125.190. "Owner" means, in reference to real property, the person or persons holding fee title to the property as well as the purchaser or purchasers under any real estate contract involving the real property. (Ord. No. 09 -610, § 3(Exh. A), 4 -7 -09; Ord. No. 09 -593, § 24,1-6-09; Ord. No. 08 -585, § 3(Exh. A), 114-08; Ord. No. 08 -583 § 3(Exh. A), 10- 21 -08. Code 2001 § 22- 1.15.) Section 8. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to any other persons or circumstances. Ordinance No. 12- Page 15 of 17 Rev 1/10 LU Section 9. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener /clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto. Section 8. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 9. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five (5) days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of ,20_ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, SKIP PRIEST ATTEST: CITY CLERK, CAROL MCNEILLY, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO.: Ordinance No. 12- Page 16 of] 7 Rev 1 /lo LU KA2012 Code Amendments\Residential Open space in CC distsricts \City Council \072312 Ordinance.doc Ordinance No. 12- Page 17 of 17 Rev 1 /10 LU 1►' �I � � IIII, I!! w STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Amendments to Federal Way Revised Code (FNVRC) Chapter 19.05, "Zoning and Development in General," Chapter 19.100, "Mitigation of Development Impacts," Chapter 19.115, "Community Design Guidelines," Chapter 19.225.070, "Multi -Unit Housing - City Center - Core," and 19.230.060, "Multi -Unit Housing - City Center - Frame" Pile No. 12- 12109 -00 -UP Public Hearing of July 18, 2012 I. BACKGROUND In recent years, the City of Federal Way has received developineiit proposals for high -rise, mixed- use-development within the City Center, specifically the City Center -Core (CC -C). in these cases, the application of the minimum 200 square feet per unit of usable open space resulted in a required open space area that exceeded the size of the building site. The current open space requirement is inconsistent with the type of higher density, mixed use development envisioned for a thriving urban center. The requirement of 200 square feet per unit is higher than what is typically required in other cities that allow high -rise, mixed -use development. In 20 10, staff reviewed the open space requirements for the Community Business (BC) zoning district and the Planning Commission recommended a reduction from 300 square feet per unit to 150 square feet per unit due to similar circumstances where multi -unit housing is only allowed in mixed use development. The City Council adopted the proposed change to open space in the BC zone. With the BC code amendment; there is currently a lesser open space requirement in the BC zone than in the CC -C and CC -F zones. As anticipated, development intensity is greater in the CC zones and it makes sense to consider a reduction to the open space requirement in the CC zones. The Planning Commission is being asked to review the proposed changes to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19 (Exhibits A -E), and forward a recommendation to the City Council's Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) and City Council. This proposed code revision is listed as a "High Priority" in the Planning Commission's 2012 work program. H. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENTS The proposed amendments to the FWRC Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code," would reduce the minimum amount of required on -site open space. In addition, design guidelines for the on -site open space are proposed that would emphasize quality over quantity and help ensure that on -site open space is usable. The design guidelines allow for a range of spaces that can be counted as FWRC Code Amendments — Open Space in CC zones File 12- 102109 -00 -UP July 18, 2012, Planning Commission Public Hearing Pagel of 4 usable open space, including rooftop terraces, private balconies, indoor spaces, and a fee -in -lieu option for up to 50% of the open space requirement. In developing the proposed amendments, staff reviewed the urban open space development standards of other cities that allow for high rise mixed use development. In addition, a good summary of open space requirements in other local cities is contained in a paper prepared for the Municipal Research and Services Center (MRSC) by Bob Bengford of MAKERS (Exhibit F). The following sections provide summaries of each of the proposed code amendments. The proposed text is enclosed in Exhibits A -E. Proposed Code Amendments 1. Recommended modification to Multi -Unit Use Zone Charts for CC -C and CC -F zoning districts. This proposed amendment would reduce the usable open space requirement from a minimum of 200 square feet per unit to 100 square feet per unit, or one half of the current requirement. The proposed reduction is more in line with mixed use high rise development. In higher density urban developments there are typically multiple uses along with structured parking, leaving little to no open space• available at the ground level: In this type of development, usable open space is often provided by a combination of: open space at ground level or above parking structures; balconies; roof top terraces; and sometimes indoor recreation or gathering spaces. Along with the proposed reduction in total open space, the use zone charts refer to a new section in the "Community Design Guidelines" chapter of Title 19 that specifies considerations and options for eligible usable open space, including a fee -in -lieu option for up to 50 percent of the required open space (Exhibits A and B). 2. Recommended modifications to FWRC 19.115, "Community Design Guidelines," to add a new section that provides design guidelines for residential usable open space for multi -unit housing in the CC -C and CC -F zones. In reducing the overall open space standard, emphasis should be placed on quality and usability of the open space provided. For that reason, a new section in Chapter 19.115, "Community Design Guidelines," is proposed. This section provides recommended minimum sizes and dimensions for private and common open space areas to be considered "usable." It also specifies when on -site public open space provided for the benefit of all site users and the general public may be credited toward the residential open space requirement. The design guidelines specify the types of amenities that should be included in common open spaces to make them engaging, and provides a suggested range of appropriate activities, including recreation, gathering places, play areas, and gardens. To provide additional flexibility, a fee -in -lieu program is proposed. A maximum of 50% of the total open space requirement may be met with the fee -in -lieu option in order to ensure there is always usable open space available on -site. The fee will be calculated based on the assessed or appraised value of the land where the project is situated, and the fees collected will be expended on park facilities within the parks planning areas that coincide with the city center zoned areas (Exhibit C). FWRC Code Amendments —Open Space in CC zones File 12- 102109 -00 -UP July 18, 2012, Planning Commission Public Hearing Page 2 of 4 3. Recommended modifications to FWRC 19.05.150, "Definitions." This proposed amendment modifies the current definitions of "open space" and "private open space," and adds a new definition for "common open space." The intent of these modifications is to make the definitions more consistent with the way they are referenced throughout Title 19 (Exhibit D). 4. Recommended modifications to FWRC 19.100.070, "Mitigation of Development Impacts." The last proposed code amendment in conjunction with the modification to on -site open space in the city center zones is to the "Mitigation of Development Impacts" section. This modification specifies the timing of payment of fees -in -lieu for open space related to residential development in the city center. It also provides a provision for deferring the fee - in -lieu payment to the time the units are occupied, similar to that provided for residential subdivisions (Exhibit E). II. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY 6/29/12: Public Notice of 7/18/12 Planning Commission public hearing published and posted 7/6/12: Issuance of Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) 7/20112: End of SEPA Comment Period 8/3/12: End of SEPA Appeal Period III. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were received as of the date of.this report. IV. REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION FWRC Chapter 19.80, "Process VI Council Rezones," establishes a process and criteria for zoning code text amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the role of the Planning Commission is as follows: 1. To review and evaluate the proposed zoning code text regarding any proposed amendments. 2. To determine whether the proposed zoning code text amendments meet the criteria established in FWRC 19.80.130. 3. To forward a recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption of the proposed zoning code text amendments. FWRC Code Amendments — Open Space in CC zones File 12- 102109 400-UP July 18, 2012, Planning Commission Public Hearing Page 3 of 4 V. DECISIONAL CRITERIA FWRC Chapter 19.80.130 provides criteria for zoning text amendments. The following section analyzes compliance of the proposed zoningtext amendments with the criteria provided by this chapter. The city may amend the text of the FWRC only if it finds that: 1. The proposed amendments are consistent with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan. The proposed FWRC text amendments ace consistent with the following Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) policies and goals: EDG4 The City will channel further residential growth into existing multi family and commercial -zoned areas, with a particular goal of encouraging residential development in the City Center. EDP6 The City will develop zoning, permitting, and potential financial incentives that encourage prioritized development consistent with comprehensive and subarea plans and orderly phased growth.. EDP14 The City will continue to utilize design guidelines to enhance the urban environment. to retain and attract businesses and residents. HP8 Consider the economic impact of all.development regulations on the cost of housing. HG3 Develop a Comprehensive Plan and zoning code that provide flexibility to produce innovative housing solutions, do not burden the cost of housing development and maintenance, and diverse the range of housing types available in the City. CCG7 Encourage housing opportunities in mixed residential/commercial settings. Promote housing opportunities close to employment. CCG13 Focus new growth, with resultant increasing demands for infrastructure and transportation in the City Center, specifically the core area Allow for higher intensity uses for efficient use of land. CCP3 Continue to support land use regulations that allow the higher intensity development expected over the next 15 to 30 years. CCP8 Provide incentives to encourage residential development in the City Center core area. CCP10 Continue to develop land use regulations that encourage the frame area to accommodate higher- density residential uses accompanied by residentially oriented retail and service uses. Z. The proposed amendments bear a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare. FWRC Code Amendments — Open Space in CC zones File 12- 102109 -00 -UP July 18, 2012, Planning Commission Public Hearing Page 4 of 4 The proposed FWRC text amendments bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, and welfare because the text amendments retain the requirement for on -site open space for multi -unit development within the city center. While the amount of open space is proposed to be reduced, this reduction better relates to the type of residential units that will likely be developed within the urban core setting. 3. The proposed amendments are in the best interest of the residents of the city. The proposed FWRC text amendments are in the best interest of the residents of the city because the reduction in on -site open space required for multi -unit housing in the city center will remove an existing barrier to construction of residential development within the city center, thereby, more readily accommodating future population growth in the city center. Additional residents in the city center will help support the local businesses and cultural attractions that the city wants to attract and retain. V. STAFF RECONIMPNDATION Based on the.above: staff. analysis and decisional criteria, staff recommends that the following amendments to FWRC Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code," be recommended for approval to the Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) and City Council. 1, Modifications to FWRC 19.225.070, 19.230.060, 19.05.150, and 19.100.070, and the addition of FWRC 19.11:5.XXX, as identified in Exhibits A -E. EXHIBITS Exhibit A — FWRC 19.225.070, Modifications to Use Zone Chart: CC -C "Multi -Unit Housing" Exhibit B — FWRC 19.230.060, Modifications to Use Zone Chart: CC -F "Multi -Unit Housing" Exhibit C— FWRC 19.115.XXX, New Section in Chapter 115 "Community Design Guidelines" Exhibit D — FWRC 19.05.150, Modifications to Definitions of "Open Space," "Common Open Space," and "Private Open Space" Exhibit E — FWRC 19.100.070, Modifications to "Mitigation of Development Impacts" Exhibit F— MRSC Paper on High Density Open Space by Bob Bengford of MAKERS FWRC Code Amendments— Open Space in CC zones File 12- 102109 -00 -UP July 18, 2012, Planning Commission Public Hearing Page 5 of 4 EXHIBIT A 19.225.070 Multi -unit housing. The followine uses shall be nermitted in the city center enre W( ­r 7nne srth;eet to rhp. rPm,lat;nne and nntpc cot forth ;r tl. cargo KA2012 Code Amendmentslitosidential Open space in CC diswicts0anning Commissiw\uhibit A 19- 225-070 Multi-Unit Housing- revised.d.doc USE ZONE CHART Z DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use .. THEN, across for REGULATIONS Minimums uired Yards oRe w ZONE a 0 3 CC -C USE a a .°a ri a z ce a SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES Multi -unit Process II None Multi-unit 70 ft. or Multi-unit 1. The city may, using process 111, modify required yard, height, lot coverage, and other site design and dimensional housing housing: same as 200 -ft. housing: requirements for aproposed development that meets the following criteria: (stacked Possible these regulations 1, 7 per unit a. The proposed development will be consisent with the adopted comprehensive plan policies for this zone; and dwelling Process for ground floor See notes b. The proposed development will be. consistent with the applicable design guidelines; and units) III use 1 and 5 See note 16 c. The street, utilities, and other. infrastructure in.the area are adequate to support the proposed development. 2. Chapter 19.265 FWRC contains regulations regarding home occupations and other accessories, facilities and activities Senior citizen or Senior citizen See note special needs Mixed use associated with this use. or special I housin : development, 3. No setback is required adjacent to.rights -of -way for senior citizen and special needs housing, when publicly visible needs senior citizen streetscape amenities, as defined in Chapter 19.44-5 05.190 FWRC, are located along the right -of -way; the siting and 20 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. housing and special design of which shall be approved bythe director. See notes 1, 3, (stacked and 9 needs 4. Multi -unit housing and accessory residential uses may be located onthe ground floor of a structure only as follows: (a) dwelling housing: ground level space 1hat_spans at least 80% of the length of the principal commercial facade, as determined by the units) Determined director, is occupied with one or more other uses(s) allowed in this zone; and (b) ground level space that spans at least on a case -by- 60% of the length of all other street-facing facades is occupied with one or more other use(s) allowed in this zone; and case basis (c) all ground level nonresidenial space(s). have a,minimum floor -to- ceiling height of 13 ft. and an average depth of 30 ft., but in no case less than 15 ft. However, stacked senior citizen or special needs housing may stand alone. 5. Building height may, be inereasedfrom the permitted outright height of 70 ft. to 200 ft. in exchange for providing publicly visible streetscape amenities, as defined in Chapter X519.05.190 FWRC, along the right -of -way; the siting and design of which shall be approved by the director. 6. The subject property must provide raweatienal M11bk open space in a total amount equal to at least 209100 sq. ft, per dwelling.unit and may include private ooenspaces such as yards, patios, and balconies, as well as common *pen spaces areas such as !p azas, playgrounds, recreation rooms, rooftopterraces, [hDatehM.pools,.active,lobbies, and.atriums. Any ief ---A- be de4eFmined en a ease by ease basis A sitizen 9F spesial minimum of 25% of the usable oneas nace provided mus4 be common open space All eligible usable open space shall also meet the reauirements specified in FWRC 19.11L.XXX. A l'ee -in -lieu payment may be utilized for up to 50% of the usable open space as specified in FWRC 19.115 XXX Continued Process I, 1I, III and IV are described in For other information about parking and parking areas see Chapter 19.130 FWRC. Chapter 19.55 FWRC, Chapter 19.60 FWRC, For details of what may exceed this height limit, see FWRC 19.110.050 et seq. Chapter 19.65 FWRC, For details regarding required yards, see FWRC 19.125.1600 seq. Chapter 19.70 FWRC respectively. KA2012 Code Amendmentslitosidential Open space in CC diswicts0anning Commissiw\uhibit A 19- 225-070 Multi-Unit Housing- revised.d.doc 19.225.070 Multi -unit housing. (Continued) KA2012 Code AmendmentAResidential Open space in CC disurictski'lanning CommiWoMexhibit A 19- 225 -070 MuWUnit Housing revisad.6.doc USE ZONE CHART m DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use ... THEN across for REGULATIONS p Minimums Required Yards F ZONE w r 4. rn CC -C N o v $ SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES USE J w` rn a xV) o:a 7. No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requirements, i.e., required buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. 8. For community design guidelines that apply to the project see Chapter 19.115 FWRC. 9. For landscaping requirements that apply to.1he project, see Chapter 19.125 FWRC. 10. For sign requirements that apply, to heproject, see Chapter 19.140 FWRC. 11. Refer to Chapter 19.265 FWRC to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. 12. For provisionsthat relate to the keeping of animals, see Chapter 19.260 FWRC. 13. Single -story buildings may not exceed a tq ground floor area of 16,000 gross sq. ft., unless approved under the provisions of FWRC 19.110.080, or approved by the director for minor additions such as entry structures, lobbies, seating or dining areas, bay windows, and similar features; provided that such addition(s) shall not exceed 1,000 sq. ft. per building in any one consecutive 12 -month period. 14. No more than 16,000 sq. R of new single -story construction may .occur on a.subject property, excluding increases approved under the provisions of FWRC 19. 110.080 and minor additions approved by the director under note 13. 15. Multiple -story buildings are not subject to notes 13- and 14; provided that each floor contains at least 75% of the gross sq. ft. of the floor below it contains a principal use(s) permitted in this zone. 16. Required parking may be reduced under the provisions of FWRC 19.130.020(3)(a), (b), (c), and (d). Process I, 11, III and IV are described in For other information about parking and parking areas, see Chapter 19.130 FWRC. Chapter 19.55 FWRC, Chapter 19.60 FWRC, For details of what may exceed this height limit, see FWRC 19.110.050 et seq. Chapter 19.65 FWRC, For details regarding required yards, see FWRC 19.125.160 at seq. Chapter 19.70 FWRC respectively. KA2012 Code AmendmentAResidential Open space in CC disurictski'lanning CommiWoMexhibit A 19- 225 -070 MuWUnit Housing revisad.6.doc EXHIBIT B 19.230.060 Multi -unit housing. The following uses shall be permitted in the city center frame (CC -F) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: Process 1, H, III and IV are described in 1 For other information about parking and parking areas, Chapter 19.1,30 FWRC. Chapter 19.55 FWRC, Chapter 19.60 FWRC, For details of what may exceed this height limit, see FWRC 19.110.050 at seq. Chapter 19.65 FWRC, For details regarding required yards, see FWRC 19.125.160 at seq. Chapter 19.70 FWRC respectively -- K:\2012 Code AmeMmentAlkesidentid Open space in CC diwActs\Planning Commission\Exhibit B 19.230 -060 Multi -Unit Housing- mvised.6.doc USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use ... THEN, across for REGULATIONS W Minimums Z V ZONE Re wired Yards � CC -F I USE ` a w a x rz a SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES Multi -unit Process II None Multi -unit housing: 70 ft. Multi-unit 1. The city may, using process III, modify required height, yard, landscape and other site design and dimensional requirements for a housing same as these or housing: proposed development that meets the following criteria: (stacked Possible requirements for 85 ft. 1.7 per unit a. The proposed development will be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan policies for this zone; and dwelling units) Process ground floor use b. The proposed development will be consistent with the applicable design guidelines; and c. The street utilities and other infrastructure in the area are adequate to support the proposed development. Senior citizen or III See notes See note 17 2. Multi -unit housing and accessory residential uses may be located on the ground floor of a structure only as follows: (a) ground level Senior citizen special needs 1, 4, and space that spans at least 60 percent of the length of the principal commercial fagade, as determined by the director, is occupied with one and special See note housing: 5 Mixed use or more other uses(s) allowed in this zone; and (b) ground level space that spans at least 40 percent of the length of all other street - facing needs housing 1 development, facades is occupied with one or more other use(s) allowed in this zone; and (c) all ground level nonresidential space(s) have a minimum 20 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. (stacked senior citizen floor -to- ceiling height of 13 ft and an average depth of 30 ft., but in no case less than 15 ft. Stacked senior citizen or special needs See notes 1, 5, 8, and 1 e dwelling units) and Special housing may stand alone. 3. FWRC 19.265.010 et. seq., contains regulations regarding home occupations and other accessories, facilities and activities associated needs with this use. housing: 4. Building height may be increased from the permitted outright height of 70 ft. to 85 ft. in exchange for providing publicly visible Determined streetscape amenities, as defined in Chapter's I9 05.190 FWRC, along the right-of-way:, the siting and design of which shall be On a case -by- approved by the director. case basis 5. Structures on property that adjoins a residential zone shall be setback a minimum of 20 ft. from the property line adjacent to the residential zone. The height of structures shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation when located between 20 ft and 40 ft. from the adjacent residentially- zoned property line, and shall not exceed 40 ft. above average building elevation when located between 40 ft. and 100 ft. from such property line: 6. The subject property must provide feeraaEieaal sp able open space in a total amount equal to at least 240 100 sq. ft per dwelling unit and may include private oDen spaces such as yards, patio;, and balconies, as well as common open spaces areas such as In azas, playgrounds, recreation' rooms, rooftop terraces, ti-patches. pools„ active lobbies, and atriums' Process 1, H, III and IV are described in 1 For other information about parking and parking areas, Chapter 19.1,30 FWRC. Chapter 19.55 FWRC, Chapter 19.60 FWRC, For details of what may exceed this height limit, see FWRC 19.110.050 at seq. Chapter 19.65 FWRC, For details regarding required yards, see FWRC 19.125.160 at seq. Chapter 19.70 FWRC respectively -- K:\2012 Code AmeMmentAlkesidentid Open space in CC diwActs\Planning Commission\Exhibit B 19.230 -060 Multi -Unit Housing- mvised.6.doc 19.230.060 Multi -unit housing. (Continued) The following uses shall be nermitted in the city center frame (CC -Fl 7.nne cnhient to the reonlatinnc and nntec set fnrfh in this epctinn- K:12012 Code AmendmentAllesidendat Open space in CC distsrictsiPlanning Commission\Exhibit B 19- 230-060 Multi -Unit Housing- revisedh.doc USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use ... THEN, across for REGULATIONS U) Minimums Z ZONE Re uired Yards � �C% ] 12 W � 0 C C -F O ' • > N C . Y USE � ° 4 a a SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES 7. No maximum lot coverage is established Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requirements; i.e., buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. 8. No setback is required adjacent to rights -of -way for senior citizen and special needs housing, when publicly visible streetscape amenities, as defined in Chapter 19.115 FWRC, are located along the right -of -way; the siting and design of which shall be approved by the director. 9. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see FWRC 19.115 FWRC. 10. For landscaping requirements that apply for the project, see Chapter 19.125 FWRC. 11. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see FWRC 19.140 FWRC. 12. Refer to FWRC 19.265.010 et seq. to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. 13. For provisions that relate to the keeping of animals, see FWRC 19.260.010 et seq. 14. Single -story buildings may not exceed a total ground floor area of 16,000 gross sq. ft., unless approved under the provisions of FWRC 19.110.080, or approved by the director for minor additions such as entry structures, lobbies, seating or dining areas, bay windows, and similar features; provided that such addition(s) shall not exceed 1,000 sq. ft. per building in any one consecutive 12 -month period. 15. No more than 16,000 sq. ft. of new single -story construction may occur on a subject property, increases approved under the provisions of FWRC 19. 110.080 and minor additions approved by the director under note 14, above. 16. Multiple -story buildings are not subject to notes 14 and 15, above; provided that each floor contains at least 75 percent of the gross sq. ft. of the floor below it and contains a principal use(s) permitted in this zone. 17. Required parking may be reduced under the provisions of FWRC 19.130.020(3)(a), (b), (c), and (d). Process I, II, III and IV are described in For other information about parking and parking areas, see Chapter 19.130 FWRC. Chapter 19.55 FWRC, Chapter 19.60 FWRC, Chapter 19.65 FWRC, For details of what may exceed this height limit, see FWRC 19.110.050 et seq. Chapter 19.70 FWRC respectively For details regarding required yards, see FWRC 19125.160 et seq. K:12012 Code AmendmentAllesidendat Open space in CC distsrictsiPlanning Commission\Exhibit B 19- 230-060 Multi -Unit Housing- revisedh.doc EXHIBIT C Federal Way Revised Code Title 19, Chapter 1,15, "Community Design Guidelines" (d) The common open space shall not be located on asphalt or gravel pavement, or be adjacent to unscreened parking lots, chain -link fences or blank walls, land may not be used for parking, loading, or vehicular access. (e) Pedestrian access ways shall only be counted as common open space when the Pedestrian path or walkway traverses a common open space that is 15 ft. or wider. (f) The common open space shall be sufficiently designed and appointed to serve as a maior focal point and gathering place Common open spaces shall include a significant number of pedestrian - oriented features furnishings, and amenities typically found in plazas and recreational open space, such as seating or sitting walls lighting, weather protection, special paving, landscaping, and trash receptacles In addition the common open space should provide one or more significant visual or functional amenities such as a water feature, fireplace, and /or artwork, should allow for active uses such as physical exercise, children's play area gathering area for group social events, and p -patch or other garden activity. (2) PRIVATE OPEN SPACE: In order to be credited toward total residential usable open space, private open space must be a minimum of 48 sg ft and have a minimum dimension of 6 ft. Q PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE OPEN SPACE: Publicly accessible open spaces provided on site may be credited toward the minimum residential usable open space requirement, as long as the open space is directly accessible to and available to residents for their use. Only the portion of the public open space directly accessible to, and available to residents for their use may be credited toward the residential usable open space requirement. U OPTION• A fee -in -lieu payment may be made to satisfy up to 50% of le open space requirement for the development of public parks and recreation improvements. Fee -in -lieu acceptance shall be at the discretion of the Parks EXHIBIT D Federal Way Revised Code Title 19, Chapter 100, "Mitigation of Development Impacts" 19.100.070 Timing of fee payments. Various sections of this Code require payment of fees to mitigate direct impacts of the development approval. Notwithstanding those fees eligible for deferment pursuant to subsections (1)(b) 1 c and (3)(b) of this section, the following describes when such fees shall be calculated and paid: (1) Open space fee -in -lieu (a) As provided in FWRC 18,55,060 and 19.115.XXX, a A fee-in-lieu of open space may be made to satisfy open space requirements at the discretion of the parks director and shall be calculated and paid at the time of plat recording for residential land divisions, or prior to building permit issuance for deferred as noted below. The fee shall be calculated based upon the square footage of open space which otherwise would have been required to be provided multiplied by the subject property's assessed or appraised value. (b) For those residential land divisions vested prior to July 2, 2015, open space fees -in -lieu may be deferred, but shall be paid no later than the closing of sale of each individual house or five years from deferment of the fee, whichever is earlier. Covenants prepared by the city shall be recorded at the applicant's expense on each lot at the time of plat recording to enforce payment of deferred fees. The fee shall be calculated at the time of plat recording and divided equally among all newly created lots. The fee shall be calculated based upon the square footage of open space which otherwise would have been required to be provided multiplied by the subject property's assessed or appraised value. As consideration for the ability to defer open space fee -in -lieu payments beyond plat recording, the applicant agrees to waive the right to interest and /or a refund if payment is not expended within five years of collection. (c) For multifamily developments in the city center -core and city center - frame, open space_ fees -in -lieu may be deferred, but shall be paid no later than the completion of construction and prior to receipt of certificate of occupancy /approval to occupy for each floor or each building if phased, or five years from the recording of the deferment covenants, whichever is earlier. Covenants prepared by the city shall be recorded at the applicant's expense, prior to building permit issuance to enforce payment of deferred fees The fee shall be calculated at the time of recording of the covenants and shall be divided equally among all residential units within the proiect The fee shall be calculated based upon the square footage of open space that otherwise expended within five years of collection. (2) Regional stormwater facility fee -in -lieu. Developments may be able to utilize stormwater detention in one of the city's regional stormwater facilities based on an area fee -in -lieu established by the city. Fees are used for construction cost recovery and shall be paid at the time of plat recording for residential land divisions and prior to building permit issuance for commercial and multifamily developments. (3) Transportation impact fee. Unless the use of an independent fee calculation has been approved, or unless a development agreement entered into pursuant to RCW 36.7013.170 provided otherwise, the fee shall be calculated and paid per the following: (a) For residential land divisions, fees shall be calculated and paid at the time of plat recording. For unplatted single- family residential lots, commercial and multifamily developments, fees shall be calculated based on the impact fee schedule in effect at the time a completed building permit application is fled and paid prior to permit issuance. For a change in use for which no building permit is required, the fee shall be calculated and paid based on the impact fee schedule in effect on the date of an approved change of use. (b) For residential land divisions and unplatted single- family residential lots, the transportation impact fee may be deferred, but shall be paid no later than the closing of sale of each individual house. Covenants prepared by the city to enforce payment of the':deferred fees shall be recorded at the applicant's expense on each lot at'the time of plat recording for residential land divisions and prior to building permit issuance for unplatted single - family residential lots. The fee shall be calculated based on the impact fee schedule in effect on the date of payment of the impact fee. (Ord. No. 10 -658, § 6, 5- 18 -10) EXHIBIT E Federal Way Revised Code Title 19, Chapter 5, "Zoning and Development in General" 19.05.150 O definitions. "Occupant" means a person that legally occupies a structure or property. "Office use " means a place of employment providing services other than production, distribution, sale or repair of-goods or commodities, and includes but is not limited to: medical, dental or other health care; veterinary, accounting, legal, architectural, engineering, consulting or other similar professional services; management, administrative, secretarial; marketing, advertising, personnel or other similar personnel services; sales offices where no inventories or goods are available on the, premises; real estate, insurance, travel agent, loan companies, brokerage or other similar services. The following uses are specifically excluded from the definition of "office ": banks, savings and loan companies and similar financial institutions. "Office zones" mean the PO, OP and CP -I zoning districts. "Official icial notification boards of the city" means the bulletin boards in the public areas of City Hall and other public locations as designated by city council; "On -site. hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities" means facilities which treat and store hazardous wastes generated on the same. property or geographically contiguous properties, which may be divided by public or private right -of- -way if the entrance and exit between the properties is at a crossroads intersection and access is by crossing as. opposed to going along the right -of- -way. "Open house " means an event held at a specific location, that is open to the public, and where the event holder remains in attendance during the event. "Open record hearing" means a hearing that creates the city's record of decision for an application or appeal through testimony and submission of evidence and information, under procedures prescribed by the city's hearing examiner or the city council. An open record hearing may be held prior to the city's decision on an application, or as part of an appeal. "Open space " , . soils. means an area of land that is valued for natural processes and wildlife, for agricultural production for active and passive recreation, and /or for providing other public benefits In certain cases, open space may refer to both outdoor and indoor spaces that provide active or passive recreational amenities fora development's occupants or users. "Open space, common," means open space which is normally utilized by the occupants of a building or property. "Open space, private," means even open space, the use of which is normally limited to the occupants of a single dwelling "Open space, public," means open space owned by a public agency and maintained by it for the use and enjoyment of the general public. "Ordinary high water mark" means, on lakes, streams and tidal waters, that mark found by examining the bed, banks, or shore and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil or land a character distinct from that of the abutting uplands with respect to vegetation. Where the ordinary high water mark cannot be found by mark, the ordinary high water mark shall be the line of mean higher high tide for salt water and the line of mean high water for fresh water. In any stream where neither mark nor mean high water can be found, the channel bank shall be substituted. In braided channels and alluvial fans, the ordinary high water mark or substitute shall be located so as to include the entire stream feature. "Outdoor" means not contained within a building. "Outdoor storage " means any material or item (including vehicles), being stored for or awaiting sale, lease, processing or repair and not enclosed within a building. "Outdoor storage containers " means new or used prefabricated metal or steel enclosures used for the accessory storage of supplies, equipment, inventory, goods, commodities, or construction- related materials; or temporary offices for active construction sites; designed without an axle or wheels; and Capable of being mounted on a chassis or bogie for movement by truck, trailer, railcar, or ship. This definition includes, but is not limited to, cargo, shipping, and freight containers; and excludes typical residential accessory buildings or structures such as garages and storage sheds; garbage and recycling containers; containers mounted on a truck or in some stage of transport; structures used or designed to be used as living facilities, and portable moving containers. as defined in this chapter. See F"C 19.125.180 and 19.125.190. "Owner" means, in reference to real property, the person or persons holding fee title to the property as well as the purchaser or purchasers under any real estate contract involving the real property. (Ord. No. 09 -610, § 3(Exh. A), 4 -7 -09; Ord. No. 09 -593, § 24,1-6-09; Ord. No. 08 -585, § 3(Exh. A), 114-08; Ord. No. 08 -583 § 3(Exh. A), 10- 21 -08. Code 2001 § 22- 1,15.) MRSC has joined with Phil Olbrechts, Attorney, Olbrechts and Associates, PLLC, Pat Dugan, Dugan Consulting Services, Anindita Mitra, founder of CREA Affiliates. LLC, and Bob Bengford, Partner, MAKERS, to bring you the "Planning Advisor" article series on planning and growth management issue affecting Washington Local Governments. The "Planning Advisor" will feature a new article each month with timely information and advice you can use.* Post a comment 0 Providing for Usable Open Space for Multifamily Developments January 2012 By Bob Bengford AICP, MAKERS This Is the second of two articles discussing regulatory strategies to address two challenges to creating compatible and livable infill development. The first article, published in February 2011, discussed strategies for protecting existing neighborhoods from the Impacts of new development. This article describes concepts for providing usable open space in new multifamily residences. Introduction Smart growth principles call for the development-of more intense mixed -use centers at transportation hubs or other strategic locations plus multifamily infill in neighborhood :centers. Demographic changes in concert with fuel costs, are increasing the demand for compact multifamily housing in Western Washington and throughout the country. With rising land costs, cities are finding it Increasingly difficult to create new parkland to serve this increased density. Thus, it's becoming increasingly important for cities to update regulations to provide for usable on -site open space associated with multifamily development. This article examines: • The goals and benefits of providing on -site multifamily open space • Research and resources • Notable challenges in providing on -site open space • A comparison in how a few Washington cities regulate open space • Lessons leamed /considerations The goals and benefits of providing on -site multifamily open space FES X Wi817 http: / /www.mrse.org /focus /pladvisor /pla0112.aspx 7/10/2012 Planning Advisor January 2012 Page 2 of 13 ....................... .... .-...--4 reasenabte-goal -for- any -city - should- be -ta- provide - residents -M h-aecess ta- usable- open- space- for recreation and leisure activities. While this is important.. for all age groups, usable open space is particularly important for children. On -site open space associated with residential development brings a number of other benefits toward creating healthy and livable communities. Below is a sample of some of the more notable benefits: • Health benefits - pathways and recreational facilities such as play areas, swimming pools, and fitness centers promote increased physical activity. Balconies and common areas also offer opportunities for gardening and growing a small amount of herbs, fruit, and /or vegetables; Enhanced residential, setting:- this includes an increase in light and air to dwelling units surrounding the common open spaces and enhanced views from units. Where landscaped open spaces are visible from the street. or adjacent properties, they bring obvious enhancements to the community's character as well. Courtyard spaces can also offer increased privacy - through the strategic configurations and the placement. of windows and landscaping; 0 Environmental benefits - ground level and courtyard spaces and even rooftop decks offer opportunities for trees and, plants which consume carbon dioxide and help to reduce stormwater runoff; Social benefits - well - designed common open spaces provide increased opportunities for social interaction with neighbors; • Safety - common open spaces that incorporate CPTED principles (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) increase the number of "eyes on the space" by allowing families to keep an eye out on children and for residents to be on the lookout for crime; and • General functional benef<ts - spaces such as balconies can provide a wide range.of other functional benefits to residential living. This can include a space to hang -dry clothing, space to barbecue, or conduct certain cleaning or other activities that are difficult to do indoors. The common open spaces at the coordinated Z -home (first net zero energy multifamily development in the country) and YWCA development in Issaquah Highlands provide for multiple functions. This includes recreational benefits, visual amenities, increased solar access to adjacent units, and low impact development techniques used in the common areas help to manage stormwater impacts from the development on the site. What are the Challenges to Providing Usable Open Space? Below are the challenges that are most often cited to providing usable on -site open space. • Lack of space. This challenge is most notable on smaller sites in heavily urbanized areas where land costs are high. Developers can argue that carving out open spaces reduces the opportunity for rental or sales income. However, the typical configuration of residential buildings on city blocks nearly always leaves plenty of left -over space to accommodate courtyard spaces between buildings and building wings. For constrained infill sites where generously sized courtyards may not i INSIHX3 http: / /www.mrse.org /focus /pladvisor /pla0112.aspx 7/10/2012 Planning Advisor January 2012 Page 3 of 13 be possible, a combination of balconies, rooftop decks, and /or indoor common open space may be saf�ierzt to satic • Cost. The cost of designing and building the open spaces affect the bottom line of developments in two ways.* Yes, they do add costs to development, but they also help to bring in revenue in terms of sales and /or increased rental rates due to the amenities they create for residents. Ultimately, open spaces don't need to be expensive. The usability of open spaces is often best determined by the basic configuration of spaces and the relationship of units, windows, building walls, and simple landscaping elements. Much of this comes from thoughtful design rather than expensive materials and furnishings. • Maintenance. This is a critical factor in the long term usability of common open spaces. While there are obvious costs associated with maintenance, the'design of open spaces can help to reduce ongoing maintenance - costs. Where residents have good access to the open spaces and frequently use them, there's a certain amount of self- maintenance that occurs. But maintenance needs to be built Into the costs of the development, just as other amenities factor into the rents that residents are willing to pay to live in particular developments. What other Literature is Out There on Multifamily Open Space? While much has been written about public open space, literature on the-benefits of private on -site open space is surprisingly hard to find. The most common source of information available is within municipal design guidelines and standards. But outside of brief Intent statements, guidelines, and graphic examples, an in -depth discussion on the benefits and characteristics of multifamily open spaces are most often left to books and literature. Some notable sources of information on ftie design and /or benefits of multifamily open space include: • Housing as if People Mattered and People Places (Cooper Markus and others). These two books - especially Housing as if People Mattered - are the best and most extensive studies of private residential open space that I've found. While the photo examples and graphics feel a little outdated, the contents and design guidelines, which touch on the full range of open space issues, are still spot on. Both books place a strong emphasis on the special needs of families with children. • Site Planning (Lynch and Hack). This classic includes excellent guidance on housing design and discusses outdoor space needs for residents, notably for children and teenagers (which they note are often forgotten in housing design). The book states that "it is better to distribute a varied set of play opportunities in many locations rather than to concentrate them in one area." Lynch and Hack discuss the importance of balancing visibility with privacy and the unique needs of individual housing types. • Pattern Language (Alexander, Ishikawa, Silverstein). *Another classic, this book includes a wealth of ideas in creating livable environments. It includes chapters on the various housing types, the needs of different age groups and families, and the design of a wide range of outdoor spaces associated with housing. • Form -Based Codes (D. Paeolek, K. Parolek, and Crawford). This includes a brief section on internal open space and provides guidance on courtyard design. The authors consider appropriate dimensions based on solar access and adjacent building heights and whether the courtyard is on the ground or on a podium over parking. There are surely other resources that I haven't stumbled upon - therefore please comment if you recommend another great resource on multifamily open space design /needs. Comparing how Pacific Northwest Cities Regulate Multifamily Open Space http:// www .mrsc.org /focus/pladvisor /pla0t 12.aspx 7/10/2012 Planning Advisor January 2012 Page 4 of 13 communities regulated internal multifamily open space. This ultimately included Seattle, Tacoma, Bellevue, and Redmond. Each city's approach differs somewhat from the others. Also, all four cities recently updated at least some of their applicable standards. Since each city has a variety of zones that allow for multifamily housing, I've divided the following chart into the segments - by housing type: apartments (single purpose), apartments in a dense mixed -use setting, and townhouses. For each city, the chart addresses the amount of open space required, design- related requirements, applicable design review process, and finally some comments and observations. Comparing Multifamily Open Space Requirements htt.p://www.mrsc.org/focus/Pladvisor/pla0l 12.aspx 7/10/2012 City Seattle Tacoma Bellevue Redmond Housing Type - Apartments (single purpose multifamily uses) Applicable Lowrise zones R -3 - R -5 zones and R -10 -30 zones, R -12 to R -30 zones? commercial zones Standards Open space standards Usable yard space plus Multifamily play area Specific open space influencing plus setbacks, density setbacks; minimum lot size, standards plus standards plus setbacks, amount and limit, parking, floor area parking, density limit (R-4L setbacks, density limit, landscaping, parking, lot type of open ratio (FAR), building/ zone only), and landscaping parking, lot coverage, coverage, and impervious space facade width limits & standards impervious area, surface standards Green Factor provisions greenscape standards (front yard), and landscape standards Open space L1 zone: 300sf common 10% of the lot size (R zones Emphasis on children's Minimum 20% of lot required /unit open space/unit - but not C zones); play areas - 800sf /10 (average) C -zones - 10% of site not units plus 50sf /unit covered by buildings must above 10 units L2 -4 zones: be landscaped 25% of the lot area as open space at ground level - except 50" /6 can be balconies /decks for L3-4 zones Required Common open space - Usable yard space - min 15' 800sf min size and All yards + decks and standards for min 10' dimension and dimension; May not be in min. dimension of 25'; porches may count as open space 250sf area; may be in front yard; May be any Design standards on open space provided they front, side or rear yard; combination of private & accessibility, amenity have minimum 15' Balcony /deck - min 6' shared space elements and dimensions; For multi -lot dimension + 60sf area separation from auto developments, standard areas can be applied for whole development Design Design review required No existing design No design guidelines 25% of open space for guidelines / for projects over certain guidelines or review process or other design review large developments must review process size threshold or for (although MAKERS recently process for the R -zone be as common open projects seeking design conducted a study for development space; Includes guidelines departures examining options for city for common open space to consider) and landscaping design; Design review process for all multifamily htt.p://www.mrsc.org/focus/Pladvisor/pla0l 12.aspx 7/10/2012 Planning Advisor January 2012 Page 5 of 13 hq: / /www.mrsc.org /focus /pladvisor /pla0112.aspx 7/10/2012 Seattle Tacoma Bellevue Redmond Comments New code generally Other than dimensional Unique in that focus is For citywide standards, and reduces the amount of standards noted above, only on children's play biggest emphasis on observations open space required - there are no standards/ areas; No mention of variety of site and building but has a greater guidance for multifamily balconies or other design emphasis on the open space in the standard usable open space design/usability of the commercial zones provisions. space; Recent increase In 'green factor' requirements is more challenging/ costly to applicants Housing Type - Apartments (higher Intensity mixed -use zones) Applicable Commercial zones Various Mixed -Use Center Downtown zones and Downtown zones, Overlake zones districts Bel -Red corridor zones Village zones reviewed (new) Standards Amenity area plus Yard space standards plus Floor area ratio (FAR), Minimum open space Influencing setbacks, density limit, density minimum, parking, max floorpiate standards, parking, amount and floor area ratio, parking, mass reduction standards, standards, tower setbacks and max floor type of open and green factor and landscaping standards stepback pro - visions, area ratio standards space provisions sidewalk/ building relationship, parking, and FAR bonus incentive provisions (some relate to outdoor open space) Open space Commercial zones: 5% 100sf /unit yard space No specific Downtown - 100sf required/unit of residential floor area requirement for common open space/unit (amenity area) Downtown or the Bel- + min 50sf private open Red Corridor space/unit; Overlake - 6.25% of gross residential floor area as open space Required Shared open space - Recently updated: 100% of There are standards & Downtown - up to 100% design min 10' dimension and space may be common yard guidelines for public of required open space can standards for 250sf area; Front, side space - min 15' dimension open spaces for be common, at least 200sf open space or rear yards OK; + other design standards; Downtown and the Bel in area, min 12' Balcony /deck - min 6' Balconies up to 50% -Red Corridor, but no dimensions; dim. + 60sf area; Must required yard space - at standards or not be enclosed; least 35sf and. min 4' guidelines for private Ova - up to 100% of Rooftop space not dimension; open space for required open space can counted as amenity area Rooftop deck up to 25% of multifamily uses (no be common, but up to yard space in mixed -use mention of balconies, 50% can be private and /or buildings for instance) rooftop open space Design Design review required No existing design Yes, there are Design review for all guidelines/ for projects over certain guidelines or review process guidelines and an multifamily; There is more review process size threshold or for (although MAKERS recently administrative design design guidance for open projects seeking design ' conducted a study for review process, but spaces in Overlake, than departures examining options for city again, no guidance for for Downtown - except to consider) private open space for there are specific multifamily uses courtyard dimensional standards for downtown hq: / /www.mrsc.org /focus /pladvisor /pla0112.aspx 7/10/2012 Planning Advisor January 2012 Seattle Comments Recent update reduces and amount of open space observations but places more emphasis on design quality, usability Housing Type: Townhouses Applicable Lownse zones zones? city Tacoma Updated standards addressed some serious regulatory shortcomings; City will probably give it some time during poor economy and see how new developments work out before creating a new design review program Bellevue Private open space Isn't directly addressed at ail; The focus is• more on maximum building forms, street/ . sidewalk relationship, and incentives for public open space R -3 -R -5 zones; Mixed -use R -10 - R -30 zones zones Standards Open space standards Usable yard space plus There are no influencing plus setbacks, density setbacks minimum lot size, standards specific to amount and limit, floor area ratio, and density limit townhouses - see type of open green factor, and open space standards space building/ facade width referenced above for limits apartments in multifamily zones Open space 300sf private ground required /unit level space (avg) with min dimensions of 10' Required Space must be directly design accessible to unit; For standards for sloping lots, decks can open space qualify as ground level space 10% of the lot size in R- zones; 200sf /unit yard space in MX zones Usable yard space - min 15' dimension; may not be in front yard Design Administrative design No existing design guidelines/ review required for all guidelines or review process review process townhouses; Process (although MAKERS recently may allow some conducted a study for flexibility in the amount examining options for city and design of open to consider) space more on the quality of Comments I Updated standards and I New townhouse standards and administrative design In MX zones addressed observations review process provide serious shortcomings, but greater flexibility than the R -3 -5 zones outside of old standards and focus MX centers still lack open more on the quality of space standards /guidance open space The setbacks and lot coverage provisions will be most influential for townhouses (other than basic market conditions); The play area provision ensures that there will be some common open space Page 6 of 13 Redmond It is interesting to see somewhat different open space approaches between Downtown An&Overiake (perhaps the timing - Overlake Standards are newer - has something to do with it). Downtown's specific standards for minimum courtyard width are unique, amongst the four cities reviewed here R -12 to R -30 zones, plus Downtown & Overlake Zones There are no standards specific to townhouses - see open space standards referenced above for apartments in multifamily zones. For Downtown - Townhouses with at least 200sf of private open space and minimum dimension of 10' are exempt from common open space standards. The 20% open space with min. 15' dimensions seem very restrictive and challenging; Planner Jeff Churchill noted that there isn't a lot of undeveloped R -12 -30 zoned land left in the city httD: / /www.mrse. ore /focus/t)ladvisor /t)Ia0112.asox 7/10/2012 Planning Advisor January 2012 Comments and Observations on Regulatory Research Seattle Page 7 of 13 With by far the largest pool of development test cases in Washington and the most intensive multifamily zoning code update process, the Inclusion of Seattle in this study is essential. I met with Mike Podowski, the City's Land Use Policy Supervisor, to talk about this article, the City's recent update, and some lessons learned. Mike reiterated that is was important for the new code to add more flexibility while enhancing the design criteria and making some refinements to the review process (notably for townhouses). Like Seattle's new code, he suggested my research table above compare different open space requirements based on the type of housing. He was also curious about research on the benefits of providing for open space. Seattle's new code substantially reduces the amount of required open space in many cases, but adds greater emphasis on the quality and usability of the open space. I talked about the new code with architect Radim Blazej (Caron Architects), who is familiar with both the old and new codes. Radim reiterated that the added flexibility in the code regarding open space dimensions makes the code much easier to work with. For example, he indicated that the opportunity to provide up to 50% of the usable open space on the roof was an attractive opportunity. He's found that such rooftop spaces are most desirable for residents in the more urbanized settings due to the view potential and sense of privacy. Tacoma The City's previous code (up to 2008) had basically no open space standards. As a result, there are a number of developments (particularly in the greater downtown area) that provide no open space or poorly designed open space. As part of a citywide "Design Review Project," I had a chance to work with the City (with MAKERS) to examine the shortcomings and propose solutions. This project included the following components: • A study on the establishment of a design review program. The project reviewed numerous examples and identified a number of optional approaches that might work for Tacoma. • Updating the design standards for the various mixed -use zones (adopted 2008). Without a special design review process in place, there was a strong desire to adopt prescriptive standards to address open space and other design shortcomings. While this approach offers less design flexibility, the standards offer a number of choices in how their requirements can be met. The newly adopted standards are reflected in the chart above in the city's mixed -use center zones only. Bellevue's regulatory approach stands out as the most unique of the four communities particularly because the city has very few established standards for private open space in multifamily developments. The city's design standards and guidelines for the most densely developed areas (Downtown and the Bel -Red Corridor) place much greater emphasis on providing publicly accessible open spaces — in addition to providing guidance for the form and character of development. Other specific comments and observations: • The recent Bel -Red Corridor Design Guidelines are the most recent guidelines project undertaken by the city, and thus represent the latest in thinking about urban design in the city. The Bel -Red code emphasizes form -based standards and includes an extensive density bonus system that includes incentives for public open space. The guidelines include numerous photos of acceptable and unacceptable design examples addressing streetscape elements, building form /character and design details, but they don't specifically address private residential open space. Perhaps with the approach in emphasizing high quality streetscape and public open space, there is a reduced need to regulate the amount and type of private Internal open space for multifamily? http:// www. mrsc. org/focus /pladvisor /pla0112.aspx 7/10/2012 Planning Advisor January 2012 Page 8 of 13 • As a Bellevue resident, I often explore new jogging routes all over downtown. I've found that downtown's super block configuration often leaves a considerable amount of land for public open space, given the natural (and /or regulatory) limitations on tower floor - plates and the extent of underground parking. Or, perhaps this open space is the result of the city's policies, guidelines and standards? Likely, it's a combination of both. • Most apartment /condo developments in downtown appear to have a good mixture of internal open spaces including balconies, ground level plazas, upper level courtyards over parking decks (there are many), some internal recreational space, and some. roof top decks (at least that I know about). The smaller infill mid -rise developments appear to have the smallest amount of open space - a situation common in nearly all urban centers in the region. • Emil King, the city's Strategic Planning Manager, noted that perhaps there was a reduced need for on -site private open space within developments that are adjacent to public parks or plazas (and I agree). He mentioned projects adjacent to the Downtown Park and the smaller Ashwood Park and Plaza as good examples. Htiving met with planner Jeff Churchill several times over the past couple years, I was aware that Redmond was in the midst of a major zoning code update and had recently adopted new zoning and design standards for the Overlake area. Additional observations and comments: • The open space standards for the multifamily zones focus primarily on landscaped ground level open space. Jeff noted that these are essentially suburban type standards, but that very little developable land in these zones remains. • The courtyard dimensional standards for Downtown are noteworthy for their ability to enhance the desirability and usability of such spaces. • The Downtown open space standards include a "fee in lieu of" open space option, but only for up to 50% of the required common open space. Some Lessons Learned First of all, it's obvious that individual regulations need to suit the unique needs of the community. By this, I mean a combination of local market demographics and unique community characteristics and goals. Some keys in crafting. approaches for regulating and designing multifamily open space include: • Recognize different needs for different housing types. Townhomes and other ground based multifamily housing types have different needs than apartment buildings with stacked flats. Regulations need to reflect those inherent differences. • Involve focal developers, designers, and builders. It's always important to talk with the local development community to find out what's working and get them involved in any process to update development standards. • Bigger is not necessarily better. Communities requiring an excessive amount and /or sizes of open spaces can actually discourage development by impacting the viability of development. The problem is compounded when there isn't adequate design guidance for.such spaces. I've found it more effective to work with the community in providing guidance in designing usable open spaces and determining the amount of usable open space necessary for livable developments and given reasonable development objectives. • Encourage a range of open space types. This is particularly important for apartment buildings. Visible common open spaces such as courtyards are typically the most important open space resources, but other types of open space should be encouraged. httv: / /www.nusc -org /focus /pladvisor /pla0112.asvx 7/10/2012 Planning Advisor January 2012 Page 9 of 13 Balconies provide a usable private open space resource where residents can barbecue, that residents typically spend on balconies is small, it's.noteworthy to consider how balconies can allow greater daylight into units and help to expand the perceived living'space within the unit. The book Housing .as if People Mattered suggests that the minimum size of a balcony to be functionally useful is 60 square feet with no dimension less than 6 feet. • Rooftop decks are becoming an increasingly important resource for infili multifamily developments in heavily urbanized areas. These spaces are more likely to be used where they feature good views, feature a range of amenities, and include design features that enhance accessibility and safety. • Pea atn ches are a feature that should be increasingly encouraged, in response to a renewed interest in the local food movement. However, the location, design, and management of pea patches are very important to ensure they can be effectively used and maintained. To be sure, they are likely to be used by only a fraction of residents, but they can serve as a visual (and even social) amenity for other residents. • Children's plaY areas should always be considered and be required to some extent in larger developments. Like nearly all open space types, visibility to /from adjacent dwelling units is critical, • Indoor recreational areas should also be an option to meet a portion of the total internal open space needs for the development (but not all of it) of infill housing types In more Intensive urban areas. These spacesshouid, be specifically designed for recreational activities and be housed in accessible and visible areas. • Woonerfs might also be considered as a usable open space resource in townhouse developments. A woonerf is a Dutch term for a street that is designed equally for pedestrians and automobiles typically where there is special paving in a curbless design Integrated with trees and other landscaped elements that can also function as a playcourt. a Consider reduced on-site open- space needs. for developments adjacent to public parks. "Adjacent" is the key word, as it's the direct visibility and accessibility that provide the link. a Test the standards. Consider both existing (if applicable) and prospective multifamily development examples that meet other zoning standards to determine different ways that developers might choose to meet the standards. Assume the worst case scenario - is it good enough? On the other hand, are the requirements overly difficult or costly to meet? • Provide examples - both good and bad. Photos and other graphic examples are helpful for developers, staff, and other participants in the development review process. I've found the bad examples to be just as helpful as the good ones. I also suggest to communities to build a photo library of completed projects that they can share with prospective applicants when needed. Common Open Space Examples http: / /www.mrse.org /focus /pladvisor /plaOI 12.aspx 7/10/2012 Planning Advisor January 2012 These open spaces above are both built over parking decks - the. landscape elements help them function as a green roof while providing for visual and functional amenities to the surrounding units. The left example above from Bainbridge Island integrates large existing trees into a relatively large "commons" while the right example in downtown Bellevue doubles as usable public open space, as there is a coffee shop to the left. Obviously bad examples. The space on the left offers no amenities other than grass area - and the slopes reduce the usability of the space for informal recreation. The large blank walls and elevation change between the open space and the dwelling units reduce its attractiveness. http: / /www.mrse.org /focus /ptadvisor /pla0112.aspx 7/10/2012 Planning Advisor January 2012 Page 11 of 13 It's obvious that these courtyards are much too narrow to function as usable open space. The design severely limits the direct sunlight available to the space and also reduces the solar access and privacy to the adjacent units. Other Open Space Examples Attractive rooftop open space (left) and a pea patch example (right). The pea patch is at the Alycone Apartments in South Lake Union, Seattle. It's situated on an upper level deck, but visible from dwelling units on both sides, very accessible, and receives ample morning and afternoon sunlight. When I visited the development last year, there was a waiting list for residents to get one of the small plots. You can see the rain barrels in the background, which include rain water from adjacent roofs and provide a water source for gardeners. The complex also provides basic tools for residents. The complex uses the pea patch as a marketing tool (see for yourself) and it has become a popular social activity for residents. Townhouse Examples http: / /www.mrsc.org /focus /pladvisor /pla0l 12.aspx 7/10/2012 Planning Advisor January 2012 Page 12 of 13 These townhouses include usable semi- private front yard open spaces, while the left example adds balconies for each unit that help to expand the living area of the units. These townhomes were provided with far too little open space amenities. There is basically no setback in. the rear yard, while the long asphalt driveways can be viewed as a wasted opportunity (move building closer to' street 'and provide some usable open space in the back). Also, the. balconies appear much too narrow to invite use. Resources /Links All of the books referenced above can be found on Amazon.com or check with your favorite book retailer. Other notable resources: • Seattle land use code. Notable sections: SMC 23.45.016 (lowrise open space requirements), SMC 23.47A.024 (residential amenity areas), and for the city's design guidelines, go to the following link: Design Review Program ADgiicant's Toolbox: Design Guidelines • Tacoma land use code. See 13.06.300(9) for Mixed -Use Center District yard space standards. • Bellevue land use code. For the Bel -Red Design Guidelines, see Section 20.25D.150. For Downtown, see Chapter 20.25A. • Redmond's new zoning code. Notable chapters are 21.08 (residential regulations), 21.10 (downtown regulations), 21.12 (Overtake regulations), and 21.36 (open space). See Article III for detailed design standards. Other notable codes /guidelines addressing residential open space: http: / /www.mrsc.org /focus /pladvisor /pla0112.aspx 7/10/2012 rlannmg Advisor January 2012 Page 13 of 13 • Portland has a number of great resources including the 1998/2008 Community Design Guidel+r�es. • Everett's C_ ore Residential Development and Desian Standards; go to Section 33G.060 for open space. Planning Advisor Pat Dugan has a unique combination of experience in both planning and public finance, spanning 35 years. As a planner, he has been a planning director in two cities (Auburn and Burien), and two regional planning agencies in Oregon and Washington; and was a planning manager in Goleta, California. In public finance, Pat has served as the chief financial officer in four public agencies including the Cities of Auburn and Lynnwood, and the Snohomish County Public Works Department. He has written extensively on financing capital facility programs and on public finance for planners. Pat now offers planning and public finance consulting services and in his own firm, Dugan Consulting Services in Everett and can be reached at consult. duganaverizon.net. Anindita Mitra, AICP is the Founder of CREA Affiliates. LLC a planning and urban design consultancy that focuses on creating awareness of unsustainable practices, and offers a platform for affected parties to openly communicate and collaborate to arrive at creative sustainable solutions. She is also one of the Co- Chairs of the Climate and Sustainability Initiative of the Washington Chapter of the American Planning Association. Anindita's current interests include the development of sustainable master plans and streetscape designs; establishing sustainable community Indicators and their Integration. into comprehensive plans and governance; identifying creative solutions directing communities towards energy - independence; preparing communities for the challenges potentially brought upon by the Climate Change phenomenon; and advancing the integration of transit and non - motorized travel solutions into community land use planning. She has worked throughout the United States for both the public and private sectors. Phil Olbrechts is a member of Olbrechts and Associates, PLLC. His practice focus is upon land use, real property and municipal law. He currently serves as hearing examiner for eight municipalities and city attorney for three cities. He represents both public and private parties and has made hundreds of presentations and on land use law throughout the State of Washington. Bob Bengford, AICP, is a Partner with MAKERS architecture, planning and urban design firm. Bob's community design work encompasses all transects, from urban downtowns and transit - oriented development to rural area planning. Since joining MAKERS 13 years ago, Bob's specialty has been helping communities craft usable development regulations and design guidelines. The combination of growing up in a sprawling Orange County (CA) track home subdivision, reviewing development plans against antiquated and inconsistent codes in rural Bonner County (ID), and working with a great mentor at MAKERS (John Owen) have helped Bob recognize the critical importance of good development regulations and design guidelines in shaping vital and healthy communities. As a resident of Bellevue, Bob has been active in various community planning issues. He's also an active four- season bicycle commuter, hiker, gardener, and urban explorer. MAKERS *The Articles appearing in the "Planning Advisor" column represent the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Municipal Research and Services Center. http:// www. mrsc. org /focus/pladvisor /pla0112.aspx 7/10/2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PLANNING COMMISSION July 18, 2012 City Hall 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers MEETING MINUTES Commissioners present: Merle Pfeifer, Lawson Bronson, Wayne Carlson, and. Tim O'Neil Commissioners absent: Tom Medhurst, Hope Elder, and Sarady Long (all excused). Staff present: Planning Manager Isaac Conlen, Senior Planner Janet Shull, Assistant City Attorney Peter Beckwith, and Administrative Assistant II Tina Piety. CALL TO ORDER Chair Pfeifer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of April 4, 2012, were approved as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENT Diana Noble- Gulliford, Federal Way Historical Society President — She noted that research and adoption of an ordinance addressing historic preservation is on the Planning Commission's 2012 Work Program and she presented the Commission with some background on the issue. She gave the Commissioners a handout where it was noted that research shows that 546 properties within the City of Federal Way were built in 1950 or before and 28 were built in 1920 or earlier. Some examples of potential Federal Way landmark status properties include the Federal Way High School, Camp Kilworth Rotary Lodge, Dumas Bay Retreat, and the Robert Verzani Home. She stated there are many others. She commented that one of the primary benefits of a historical preservation program is that owners of designated landmark properties would be eligible to apply for a variety of incentive programs for preservation. A historical preservation program would implement the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan's policies. A discussion was held regarding Federal Way High School being a potential Federal Way landmark. It was noted that Federal Way Public Schools is considering demolishing the school and replacing it with a new one. It was noted that portions of the school could be preserved. The entire building does not necessarily have to be preserved if it is declared an historical landmark. It would depend upon the landmark preservation policies adopted by the city. Developing these policies will be part of the proposed code amendment. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT None KAPlanning Commission\201lWeeting Summary 07- 18- 12.doc Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 July 18, 2012 COMMISSION BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING — Proposed Amendments Related to Open Space Standards for Multi -Unit Residential Development Within the City Center -Core and City- Center Frame Zoning Districts Ms. Shull delivered the staff report. The proposed amendment will reduce the minimum amount of required on -site open space for residential development in the City- Center Core (CC -C) and City- Center Frame (CC -F) zoning districts. In addition, it includes design guidelines that will emphasize quality over quantity and help ensure the on -site open space is usable. It will modify the open space definitions to make them more consistent with the way they are referenced throughout the code. Finally, it will add the option of a fee -in -lieu for open space related to residential development in the CC zones. Currently, the code requires a minimum of 200 square feet of usable open space per unit of residential development. Reviews of recent development proposals for high -rise, mixed -use development has shown that this requirement results in a required open space area that exceeds the size of the building site. Staff recommends that the amount of required usable open space be reduced to a minimum of 100 square feet. Ms. Shull stated that in 2010, the City Council approved the recommended reduction of usable open space area in the Community Business (BC) zoning districts from 300 square feet per unit to 150 square feet per unit due to similar circumstances. This resulted in a lesser open space requirement in the BC zone as opposed to the CC -C and CC -F zones. It is anticipated that development in the CC zones is more intense than the BC zone and therefore, it makes sense to consider a reduction to the open space requirement in the CC zones. A new section is proposed for Chapter 19.115 that will provide recommended minimum sizes and dimensions for private and common open space areas to be considered "usable." The proposed section will allow for common (such as gyms, pools, and gathering spaces), private (balconies, etc.), and publicly accessible open space (when directly accessible to residents) of particular dimensions. Common open space areas will be required to provide amenities that will make them engaging and will allow for active use (such as child play areas). In addition, the proposed new chapter will allow a fee -in -lieu option for a maximum of 50% of the total open space requirement. The fees will be used for park facilities within the parks planning areas that coincide with the CC zoned areas. Commissioner O'Neil asked what percentage of the open space must be public access. Ms. Shull replied that the open space is intended for the residents and does not necessarily have to be accessible to the public. Commissioner O'Neil expressed his concern that if a developer chooses the fee -in -lieu option, the money may not be used in a way that is directly beneficial to the residents. Commissioner O'Neil expressed his concern that if the open space is to benefit the residents he is uneasy with the option of a fee -in -lieu which will go to a park that may not benefit the residents. Commissioner Bronson stated he finds the proposed definitions confusing and asked for clarification. Ms. Shull replied that the city has a number of different types of open space and the definitions are staff attempts to capture them all. Commissioner Bronson asked what the reason is for choosing 100 square feet. Mr. Shull replied that staff used the Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington (MRSC) report titled, "Providing for Usable Open Space for Multifamily Developments," that is an exhibit to the staff report. The report compares the open space requirement for various cities in Washington. Staff also researched comparable cities outside of Washington. Some cities used a percentage of gross square footage, but staff felt this would be difficult to implement. Commissioner Bronson expressed his concern that the 100 square feet is not based on objective data, but he recognizes that objective data may not exist. Commissioner Carlson expressed his concern about the aesthetics of the buildings. He suggested that a certain percentage (say 10 %) of the open space be required to be on the ground level. Commissioner O'Neil agreed and stated what he is missing is how this proposal fits into the overall vision for the city KAPlanning Commission\201 lNeeting Summary 02- 22- 12.doc Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 July 18, 2012 center. He is concerned that not requiring a percentage of open space on the ground level could result in the city center looking and feeling like a "closed compound." Ms. Shull replied that currently the code does not require that residential open space be provided on the ground level. The proposed amendment is not intended to address the issue of public open space, but rather private, residential open space (some of which can be public open space). Commissioner Bronson expressed concern that the option of a fee -in -lieu will not meet the intent of the proposed code amendment to provide open space for the residents of the building. Other Commissioners agreed with him. Ms. Shull explained that staff wanted to give developers the flexibility of the fee -in -lieu in cases where they are not able to meet the open space requirement on -site. Mr. Conlen commented that it is expected that developers will choose the fee -in -lieu option only as a last resort. Mr. Beckwith commented that state law requires that fee -in -lieu payments provide a direct benefit to those making the payment and that the funds be spent within five years of receipt. The Commissioners agreed that this is acceptable. Commissioner Bronson moved (and it was seconded) to recommend approval of the staff's recommendation as stated on page 5 of the staff report. There was no further discussion. The motion carried unanimously. The public hearing was closed. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS The next Planning Commission meeting will be August 15, 2012, or September 5, 2012, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. It will be a public hearing regarding parking. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. KAPIanning Commission\201Meeting Summary 02- 22- 12.doc COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 4, 2012 ITEM #: bb .............................................._......_...................__........................................................... ............................... _..... ....._.............._..._..........................................._._....__.........................................................__.........._................ ..........................._... .................................................................................... ............................... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL POLICY QUESTION: Should the City grant Tacoma Department of Public Utilities, Water Division a Franchise ordinance to operate and maintain a water system within the City of Federal Way? COMMITTEE: Finance, Economic Development and Regional MEETING DATE: August 28, 2012 Affairs Committee CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ® Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Cary M Roe, P.E., Director of Parks, Public Works and /1, WDEPT: Public Works Emerency Management ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................... ........................................_.__--- ................... -- $ ....................... __._. Attachments: Memorandum to the Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee dated August 28, 2012. Options Considered: 1. Approve the Ordinance and forward to the September 4, 2012 City Council meeting for first reading. 2. Modify the Ordinance and forward to the September 4, 2012 City Council meeting for first reading. 3. Reject the Ordinance and provide direction to staff. .......... -- .... _......_ ... ... ....................... _..... ................................................................................................................................................ .................... _ ... _ ............. ............................. . .......... ......... _.. ................................... ... ............ __ ............. _ ............. _.__.._ .... _ ................. _ ... _ ..... _ ....................... __._ ... __ _ ....__.__._ ... _................ MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the September 4, 2012 Council Agenda for first reading. MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: Commi a Co Committee Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommends forwarding Option 1 to the September 4, 2012 Council Agenda for first reading. Bob u PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: 11T READING OF ORDINANCE (09/04/2012): "1 move to forward the ordinance to a second reading for enactment on the September 18, 2012 Council agenda. " 2ND READING OF ORDINANCE (09/18/2012): "I move approval of the Tacoma Department of Public Utilities, Water Division Franchise ordinance. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # Un ❑ DENIED 1ST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED - 02/06/2006 RESOLUTION # CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: August 28, 2012 TO: Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee VIA: Skip Priest, Mayor FROM: Cary M. Roe, P.E., Director of Parks, Public Works an Emergency Management Marwan Salloum, P. E. Deputy Public Works Director SUBJECT: City of Tacoma Department of Public Utilities, Water Division - Franchise Ordinance BACKGROUND: The City of Tacoma Department of Public Utility, Water Division (Tacoma Water) had an existing non- exclusive franchise (Ordinance # 99 -34) for the purpose of installation, operation and repair of water systems located within their water service area in the City of Federal Way through June 24, 2009. In 2009 the City approved an amendment to the existing Franchise (Ordinance 09 -165) extending the term to June 24, 2010. In 2010 the City Of Federal Way and Tacoma Water approved an amendment to the existing Franchise (Ordinance 10 -657), extending the term to remain in effect until six (6) month after the resolution of the matter pending in the King County Superior Court Cause No. 09- 2- 45435 -3. The court rendered a decision earlier this year which required a new franchise to be negotiated and presented to the City Council for approval. See attached copy of the proposed franchise ordinance. The term of this Franchise is for a period of ten (10) years commencing on the effective date of this Franchise consistent with franchises the City has granted to other utility provider. The proposed Franchise ordinance also addresses the fire hydrant cost issue. Tacoma Water will bear full responsibility for Public Fire Protection and any associated costs and will not assess those costs against the City. In exchange, the City will forego the imposition of a franchise fee or utility tax on Tacoma Water in addition to the other benefits derived from this franchise. Additional issues that were added and /or further clarified in this franchise Ordinance are: • System abandonment • System General Maintenance • Franchisee duty for relocation of its facilities • Termination of Easements in the existing and/or future right of way Tacoma Water agrees to pay a fee or a charge in the amount of $3,400 to recover the actual reasonable administrative expenses incurred by the City that are directly related to preparing and approving this Franchise. cc: Project File Day File K: \FEDRAC\2012 \08 -28 -12 Tacoma Franchise Ordinance.doc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, GRANTING CITY OF TACOMA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES, WATER DIVISION, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND PUBLIC UTILITY SELLING AND DISTRIBUTING WATER WITHIN KING COUNTY, A NONEXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO OCCUPY THE RIGHTS -OF- WAY OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, THROUGH THE FRANCHISE AREA FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTING, MAINTAINING, REPAIRING, RENEWING AND OPERATING A WATER DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSMISSION SYSTEM AND ACCESSORIES WITHIN AND THROUGH THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND ADDRESSING HYDRANT COSTS WITHIN CITY BOUNDARIES. WHEREAS, the City Council of Federal Way finds that it is in the public interest to specify the rights and duties of the water utility through a franchise; and WHEREAS, in exercising said authority pursuant to RCW 35A.47.040 relating to franchises and permits, the City of Federal Way reserves such other powers and authorities held by Washington code cities; now therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Definitions Where used in this Franchise the following terms shall be defined as follows: 1.1 "City" means the City of Federal Way, Washington, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, and its respective successors and assigns. 1.2 "Council" means the City of Federal Way Council acting in its official capacity. 1.3 "Director" means the Public Works Director, or designee, of the City of Federal Ordinance No. Page 1 of 24 REV 5/12 Way Public Works Department. 1.4 "Facilities" means water pipes, mains, appurtenances and accessories necessary for the transmission and distribution of water within the Franchise Area. 1.5 "FWRC" means the Federal Way Revised Code. 1.6. "Franchise Area" means City owned or maintained rights -of -way and the BPA corridor as set forth in Exhibit A. Exhibit A may be updated by the City upon the City's acquisition or vacation of right -of -way. 1.7 "Franchisee" means City of Tacoma, dba Tacoma Public Utilities, a municipal corporation, and public utility, and its respective successors and assigns. 1.8 "Public Fire Protection" means fire hydrants, the water distribution system to make the hydrants operational, the necessary hydrant water supply, and related system and administrative activities. Section 2. Grant/Acceptance 2.1 Grant of Franchise. The City does hereby grant to Franchisee, subject to the terms of this Franchise, the right, privilege, authority and franchise to: (a) Lay, construct, extend, repair, renew, and replace Facilities in the Franchise Area; and (b) To charge and collect tolls, rates and compensation for such water service and such uses. 2.2 Acceptance by Franchisee. Franchisee shall have no rights under this Franchise, nor shall Franchisee be bound by the terms and conditions of this Franchise, unless Franchisee Ordinance No. Page 2 of 24 REV 5/12 shall, within sixty (60) days after the effective date of this Franchise, file with the City its written acceptance of this Franchise and all of its terms and conditions. Section 3. Conditions of Use. 3.1 Non - Franchise Area City Property. The Franchisee shall place Facilities in the Franchise Area, but not on any other public property owned, in whole or in part, leased, or otherwise occupied by the City unless an easement is granted. 3.2 Termination of Easements. Easements held by Franchisee over property located in the existing and/or future Franchise Area shall terminate if the easement area becomes right -of -way. In the event the area becomes City owned right -of -way and upon the City's request, Franchisee shall sign a release terminating such easements. 3.3 Operation costs. Franchisee shall be solely responsible for the operation, maintenance repair and construction of its Facilities. 3.4 Abandonment. When section 6.3 applies or for new Franchisee projects, Franchisee will notify the City when a Facility has been deemed obsolete and its use discontinued. The Facility shall be removed by Franchisee, at its expense, within one hundred (180) days of the date the Facility's use is discontinued or in conjunction with the City's approved project. The City may deem a Franchisee's Facility obsolete and require that it be removed if the Facility has been replaced with a new Facility and the old Facility ceases to be operational for more than ninety (90) days. If Franchisee fails to remove the Facility, the City or its agent may cause the Facility to be removed pursuant to Section 14 of the Franchise. However, with the express written consent of the City, Franchisee may leave such Facility in place. The City's consent shall not relieve Franchisee of the Ordinance No. Page 3 of 24 REV 5 /12 obligation and/or costs to subsequently remove or relocate such Facility at the City's request, in which case Franchisee shall perform such work at no cost to the City in accordance with Section 15. The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration, revocation or termination of this Franchise. Section 4. Term. Subject to Franchisee filing its acceptance pursuant to Subsection 2.2, the term of this Franchise shall be for a period of ten (10) years commencing on the effective date of this Franchise, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the terms of this Franchise or other applicable law. This Franchise may be renewed for one additional ten (10) year period upon written request of Franchisee and acceptance by the City not more than two (2) years or less that one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the expiration of the initial term. Section 5. Public Fire Protection Franchise Fee and Utility Tax. Franchisee shall bear full responsibility for Public Fire Protection and any associated costs and shall not assess those costs against the City. in exchange, the City shall forego the imposition of a Franchise fee or utility tax on Franchisee in addition to the other benefits derived from this Franchise. The parties agree that the terms of this section are consistent with the Supreme Court's rulings in Lane v. City of Seattle, 164 Wn.2d 875 (2008) and City _of Tacoma v. City of Bonney Lake, 173 Wn.2d 584 (2012) and all claims arising out of or associated with City of Tacoma v. City of Bonney Lake, King County Superior Court Cause No. 09 -2- 45435 -3 are hereby resolved. Section 6. Location of Facilities 6.1 Location. The location of existing water pipes, laterals, and appurtenances, their Ordinance No. Page 4 of 24 REV 5/12 depths below surface of ground or grade of a right -of -way (if available), shall be submitted to the City in the form of a map(s) showing the approximate location of Franchisee's existing water system within the Franchise Area. Upon written request of the City, Franchisee shall update such map to reflect actual or anticipated improvements to the system. Any such map (or update thereof) so submitted shall be for informational purposes only and shall not obligate Franchisee to undertake any specific improvements, nor shall such map be construed as a proposal to undertake any specific improvements. 6.2 GIS Data. The Franchisee shall provide, at such time as Franchisee develops and employs, Geographic Information System ( "GIS ") technology for its water utility maps and records throughout its service area and has such information available in digital GIS format for its Facilities within the Franchise Area. 6.3 Design Markings. In the event the City desires to design new streets or intersections, renovate existing streets, or make any other public improvements, Franchisee shall at the City's reasonable request, provide the location of Franchisee's underground Facilities, and use due diligence to locate and mark its abandoned Facilities, within the Franchise Area by either field markings or by locating the Facilities on the City's design drawings, and shall provide all other reasonable cooperation and assistance to the,City. 6.5 No Warranty or Waiver. Nothing herein is intended to relieve the parties of their respective obligations arising under Chapter 19.122 RCW or other applicable law with respect to determining the location of utility facilities prior to construction. Further, neither the provisions of this Franchise nor the absence of any specific provision in this Franchise is intended to limit, Ordinance No. Page 5 of 24 REV 5/12 detract from or render ineffective any disclaimer (including, without limitation, any disclaimer as to accuracy or completeness) placed by Franchisee on any map furnished to the City pursuant to Section 6.2 of this Franchise. Section 7. Noninterference of Facilities Franchisee agrees to maintain its Facilities and perform all work within the Franchise Area: (I) so as not to unreasonably interfere with the free passage of traffic, (2) in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and City ordinances, regulations resolutions and rules, and (3) as required by the Director. Section 8. Requirement to Obtain Permits 8.1 Permits. Franchisee shall, at its expense, obtain all permits, (including rights -of -way permits), and pay all permit fees required by applicable City ordinances, regulations, resolutions and rules prior to commencing any work within the Franchise Area. Franchisee permit applications shall show the position and location of the mains, laterals, and extensions to be constructed, laid, installed, or erected at that time, show their relative position to existing rights -of -way or property lines upon prints drawn to scale, designate rights -of -way by their names and improvements, such as, but not limited to, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, shoulders of roadway, ditches, paved roadways, roadways to property lines, turnouts, parking strips, telephone or electric distribution poles, and water pipes existing on the ground to be occupied, or as required by the Director. The level of detail for water services and hydrant laterals shall be commensurate with the complexity of the work to be performed. The Franchisee shall specify the class and type of materials to be used, equipment to be used, and mode of safeguarding and facilitating the public traffic during construction. Materials and Ordinance No. Page 6 of 24 REV 5/12 equipment shall be in new or like -new condition for its type and kind. The manner of excavation, construction, installation, backfill, and temporary structures such as, but not limited to, traffic turnouts and road obstructions shall meet the standards of the FWRC and be satisfactory to the Director. All traffic control shall be in accordance with the right -of -way permit, and shall be in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The Franchisee shall indicate on the right -of -way use permit application the time needed to complete the work. The time needed to complete the work is subject to approval by the City as a condition of the issuance of the right -of -way permit. 8.2 Emergency. In the event of an emergency in which Franchisee's Facilities within the Franchise Area are in a condition as to immediately endanger the property, life, health or safety of any individual, Franchisee may take action immediately to correct the dangerous condition without first obtaining any required permit so long as such permit is obtained by Franchisee as soon as practicable thereafter. Franchisee will inform the City of the nature and extent of the emergency and the work to be performed prior to or at the commencement of the work, if reasonably possible, or immediately following cessation of the emergency. 8.3 Notice of Entry. At least forty -eight (48) hours prior to entering right of way adjacent to or on private property to perform the installation, maintenance, repair, reconstruction, or removal of Facilities, except those emergency activities exempted from permit requirements or non - permit work, a written notice describing the nature and location of the work to be performed shall be communicated to the private property occupant by Franchisee. Examples of acceptable notice include but are not limited to a pre - printed door hanger, mailed letter, and/or sandwich boards. Ordinance No. Page 7 of 24 REV 5/12 Section 9. Standard of Performance The Franchisee shall not excavate for a distance ofmore than one hundred feet (100) without immediately backfilling and compacting to surface grade and permit requirements. Backfilled trench areas within a driving lane must be patched, either temporarily or permanently, before the end of the workday in which they have been opened. Trench areas within the right -of- way, but not in a driving lane must also be patched within the time limits specified by the City on the right -of -way use permit. Final surface restoration shall be completed within thirty (30) days and shall be equal to or better than the surface condition prior to permit issuance. Any asphalt overlay in the Franchise area within five (5) years of the date of a permit application, shall not be open cut by the Franchisee unless in an emergency. Streets that are open cut will require asphalt overlay for approximately one (1) blocks in length or as determined by the Director. Franchisee shall, in carrying out any authorized activities within the Franchise Area, comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and standards, as now existing or hereafter adopted or amended, and shall comply with the terms of this Franchise, whether or not the work is performed by the Franchisee, its agents, employees, subcontractors, or other third parties at Franchisee's direction. Upon completion of any water main installation of Franchisee's Facilities within the Franchise Area, the "as- built" location of the Facilities shall be within two (2) feet of the location of the Facilities shown in the plans submitted by Franchisee to the City's Public Works Department or closer if required by State law. Nothing herein is intended to relieve the parties of their respective obligations arising under applicable law with respect to determining the Ordinance No. Page 8 of 24 REV 5/12 location of utility facilities. Section 10. Survey Markers and Monuments Franchisee shall, using a licensed surveyor, immediately replace all markers or monuments disturbed during any work by Franchisee within the Franchise Area. Franchisee shall pay all costs associated with such lost, destroyed or disturbed monuments or markers. Section 11. Surface Markings /Stakes Prior to Franchisee commencing any excavation work within the Franchise Area, Franchisee shall reference all monuments and markers relating to subdivisions, plats, highway, and other surveys. The reference points shall be located so that they shall not be disturbed during the Franchisee's operations under this franchise. The method referencing these monuments or other points shall be approved by the City before placement. The construction shall be made as expeditiously as conditions permit, and as directed by the City. The cost of monuments or other markers lost, destroyed, or disturbed, and the expense of replacement of the monuments, shall be borne solely by the Franchisee. A complete set of reference notes for monuments and other ties shall be filed with the City. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between this Section 11 and Chapter 19.122 RCW, as now existing or hereafter amended, Chapter 19.122 RCW will control. Section 12. Notification to fire district If it is necessary to shut down or diminish the water pressure so that fire hydrants may be affected, the Franchisee shall notify the appropriate fire district by telephone followed by faxed transmittal or written notification, that water pressure or fire flow conditions have been affected. Ordinance No. Page 9 of 24 REV 5/12 In case of a planned shutdown or diminished water flow, at least forty -eight (48) hour prior notification to the fire district is required. If more than one fire hydrant is affected, Franchisee must provide a map of the affected area to the appropriate fire district. Section 13. Right of City to Undertake Maintenance Work The laying, construction, maintenance, and operation of Franchisee's system of water pipe, laterals and appurtenances granted under this franchise shall not preclude the City, its accredited agents or its contractors from doing necessary maintenance work contiguous to the Facilities, provided that the Franchisee shall have sufficient notice of blasting or excavating in order that Franchisee may protect its lines or pipe or property. Section 14. Right of Cijy to Complete Work In the event Franchisee fails to comply with any applicable federal, state or City laws, ordinances, rules, regulations or standards or with any of the terms of this Franchise, and such noncompliance continues for a period of fourteen (14) calendar days after Franchisee receives written notice from the City regarding the noncompliance, the City may, but in no event is the City obligated to, order any work completed, including without limitation Franchisee's obligation to repair pursuant to Section 9 herein and Franchisee's obligation to remove Facilities pursuant to Section 15 herein. If the City causes such work to be done by its own employees or by any person or entity other than Franchisee, Franchisee shall, upon the City's written request, immediately reimburse the City for all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City in having such work performed, which costs may include the City's reasonable overhead expenses and attorneys fees. However, the City shall not have any plumbing work accomplished by any person or entity other than Franchisee. Ordinance No. Page 10 of 24 REV 5/12 Section 15. Notice to Franchisee of Work by City 15.1 City Reservation of Rights. The City reserves the right to use, occupy and enjoy the Franchise Area for any purpose that is not inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this Franchise. The rights reserved herein include, without limitation, the construction of any electrical, water, sewer or storm drainage line, installation of traffic signals, street lights, trees, landscaping, bicycle paths and lanes, equestrian trails, sidewalks, other pedestrian amenities, and other public street improvement projects. This Franchise is not an exclusive franchise. Without limiting Franchisee's rights under this Franchise, this Franchise shall not in any manner prohibit the City from granting other and further franchises in, under, over, upon, and along the Franchise Area. 15.2 City's Duties. In the event the City undertakes any work, including necessary maintenance within a right -of -way in which Franchisee's Facilities are located, and such work necessitates the relocation of Franchisee's then existing Facilities within the Franchise Area, the City shall: (a) Provide written notice to Franchisee requesting such relocation within a reasonable time prior to the commencement of such City work; and (b) Provide Franchisee with copies of pertinent portions of the City's plans and specifications for such City work so that Franchisee may relocate its Facilities to accommodate such City work. 15.3 Franchisee's Duties. After receipt of the City notice requesting the relocation of the Facilities pursuant to Subsection 15.2(a) and receipt of the plans and specifications pursuant to Subsection 15.2(b), Franchisee shall, within thirty (30) days of notification, or such time as Ordinance No. Page 11 of 24 REV 5/12 approved by the Director, raise, lower, or move such Facilities within the Franchise Area at its sole cost and expense so as to conform to such new grades as may be established, and place the pipe in a location or position causing the least interference with the improvement, repair, or alteration contemplated by the City. If the City improves the Franchise Area, Franchisee shall at its sole cost and expense, upon receipt of notice, replace the pipe or pipes located in the improved subgrade of the improvement with pipe or pipes conforming to the specifications for the improvement of the Franchise Area. For all transmission mains, defined as mains exceeding 24 inches in diameter, within the Franchise Area, whether in rights -of -way or easements, the City will attempt to design its projects to minimize the need for relocation. In the event the City's design calls for the relocation of a transmission main, the City and Franchisee will meet to discuss potential redesign solutions. Before moving forward with the development of a redesign, the City will provide Franchisee with an estimate of the costs of the redesign and construction. Any additional redesign or construction costs incurred by the City shall be borne by Franchisee. If a redesign is not reasonably feasible, then Franchisee shall relocate the transmission main at its sole cost. 15.4 Exclusivity. This Section 15 shall govern all relocations of Franchisee's Facilities required in accordance with this Franchise. Nothing in this Section 15 shall require Franchisee to bear any cost or expense in connection with the location or relocation of any Facilities existing under benefit of easement on property owned by a person or entity other than the City. Section 16. Damage Repair In case of damage by the Franchisee or by the Facilities of the Franchisee to rights -of -way, or to public and private improvements to rights -of -way, the Franchisee agrees to repair the Ordinance No. Page 12 of 24 REV 5/12 damage at its own cost and expense. The Franchisee shall, upon discovery of any such damage, immediately notify the City. The City will inspect the damage, and set a time limit for completion of the repair. If the City discovers damage caused by the Franchisee to rights -of -way, or to public and private improvements to rights -of -way, the City shall give the Franchisee notice of the damage and set a time limit in which the Franchisee must repair the damage. In the event the Franchisee does not repair a right -of -way or an improvement to a right -of -way as required in this section, the City may repair the damage pursuant to Section 14 of this Agreement. Section 17. General Maintenance Franchisee will maintain Facilities located within the Franchise Area in good operating condition and repair in a manner consistent with applicable law and prudent utility practice, and will comply with the following procedures: (a) Franchisee will provide the City, on an annual basis upon the City's written request, a proposed schedule of its routine water main replacement or repair activities within the Franchisee Area. If known at the time of the City's request, Franchisee will include other proposed activities that are scheduled to be done in the Franchise Area. Similarly, the City will provide the Franchisee, on an annual basis, its overlay and other upcoming CIP projects. (b) The parties will meet, at least annually upon either party's written request, to discuss concerns regarding the timing, scope, nature or method of such repair or replacement activities and upcoming CIP projects within the Franchisee Area. Section 18. Intentionally omitted. Section 19. Default Ordinance No. Page 13 of 24 REV 5 /12 19.1 Notice of Default. If Franchisee shall fail to comply with any of the provisions of this Franchise, the City may serve a written notice to Franchisee ordering such compliance and Franchisee shall have sixty (60) days from the receipt of such notice in which to comply. 19.2 Revocation of Franchise. If Franchisee is not in compliance with this Franchise after the expiration of the sixty (60) day period, the City may, by ordinance, declare an immediate forfeiture of this Franchise. Section 20. Limited Rights This Franchise is intended to convey only a limited right and interest to Franchisee in the Franchise Area. This Franchise is not a warranty of title'or conveyance of any ownership interest in or to the Franchise Area to Franchisee. Section 21. Eminent Domain The existence of this Franchise shall not preclude the City from acquiring by condemnation, in accordance with applicable law, all or a portion of Franchisee's Facilities within the Franchise Area for the fair market value thereof. In determining the value of such Facilities, no value shall be attributed to the right to occupy the Franchise Area conferred by this Franchise. Section 22. Vacation If at any time the City, by ordinance, vacates all or any portion of public streets, roads and/or rights -of -way within the Franchise Area, the City will not be liable for any damages or loss to the Franchisee by reason of such vacation. The City agrees to exert reasonable good faith efforts to reserve an easement for Franchisee's lines and Facilities when a street, public way, or area is vacated. The City may, after thirty (30) days written notice to Franchisee, terminate this Ordinance No. Page 14 of 24 REV 5 /12 Franchise with respect to any such vacated area. Section 23. Compliance with Laws Franchisee shall comply with all applicable federal, state and City laws, ordinances, resolutions, regulations, standards and procedures, as now existing or hereafter amended or adopted, including without limitation the State Environmental Protection Act, the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA), and the Washington Safety .and Health Act of 1973 (WISHA); provided, however, that if any term or condition of this Franchise and any term or condition of any City law, code, ordinance, resolution, regulation, standard, procedure, permit or approval are in conflict, the term or condition of this Franchise will control. Section 24. Guarantee Franchisee shall guarantee work completed by the Franchisee under this Franchise for a period of twenty (20) years against settlement or repair. Section 25. Charge for Administrative Costs Franchisee agrees to pay a fee or charge to recover the actual reasonable administrative expenses incurred by the City in the amount of $3,400.00, which is directly related to preparing and approving this Franchise. Nothing herein shall preclude the City from recovering any administrative costs incurred by the City in the approval of permits or in the supervision, inspection or examination of all work by Franchisee in the Franchise Area as prescribed in accordance with applicable provisions of the FWRC. Section 26. Indemnification Franchisee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless and defend the City, its elected officials, Ordinance No. Page 15 of 24 REV 5/12 officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, including, without limitation, their respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising from, resulting from, or connected with this Franchise to the extent caused in part or in whole by the acts, errors or omissions of the Franchisee, its officers, partners, shareholders, agents, employees, or by the Franchisee's breach of any provisions of this Franchise; provided, however, that this section shall not be construed as requiring Franchisee to indemnify, hold harmless or defend the City against claims or damages arising from the negligence of the City, its agents or employees. In the event any claim, demand, suit or action is commenced against the City which gives rise to Franchisee's obligation pursuant to this Section 26, the City shall promptly notify Franchisee thereof, and Franchisee shall use attorneys selected by the City. Franchisee shall not settle or compromise any such suit or action except with prior written consent of the City, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. The City shall have the right at all times to participate through its own attorney in any suit or action which arises pursuant to this Franchise when the City determines that such participation is required to protect the interest of the City or the public. In the event it is determined that RCW 4.24.115 applies to this Franchise, Franchisee agrees to defend, hold harmless and indemnity the City to the Maximum extent permitted thereunder, to the full extent of Franchisee's negligence. Franchisee hereby releases, covenants not to bring suit and agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City from any and all claims arising against the City by virtue of Franchisee's exercise of the rights granted herein. Section 27. Insurance Ordinance No. Page 16 of 24 REV 5/12 27.1 Minimum Limits. The Franchisee agrees to carry as a minimum, the following insurance, in such forms and with such carriers as are satisfactory to the City. (a) Workers compensation and employer's liability insurance in amounts sufficient pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington; (b) Commercial general liability insurance with combined single limits of liability not less than $5,000,000 for bodily injury, including personal injury or death, products liability, contractual coverage, operations, explosion, collapse, underground and property damage; and (c) Automobile liability insurance with combined single limits of liability not less than $5,000,000 for bodily injury, including personal injury or death and property damage. 27.2 Mandatory Insurance Provisions. The comprehensive general liability insurance and automobile liability insurance policies shall be endorsed to contain the following provisions: (a) The City, its officers, elected officials, employees, and volunteers are to be named as additional insured; (b) Coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability; (c) Coverage shall not be suspended, canceled, modified or reduced except after thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested; and (d) Coverage shall be primary as to the City, its officers, officials, employees Ordinance No. Page 17 of 24 REV 5/12 and volunteers. Any insurance or self - insurance by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of Franchisee's required insurance. 27.3 Verification of Coverage. Franchisee shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements evidencing the coverage required. by this Section. The certificates and endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf and must be received and approved by the City prior to the commencement of any work. At the City's request, Franchisee shall deliver certified copies of all required insurance policies. 27.4 Self- Insurance. In satisfying the insurance requirements set forth in this Section, Franchisee may self - insure against such risks in such amounts as are consistent with good utility practices. Franchisee shall provide the City with sufficient written evidence, upon request, that such insurance (or self - insurance) is being so maintained by Franchisee. Such written evidence shall include, to the extent available from Franchisee's insurance carrier, a written certificate of insurance with respect to any insurance maintained by Franchisee in compliance with this Section. Section 28. General Provisions 28.1 Entire Agreement. This Franchise contains all of the agreements of the Parties with respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this Franchise and no prior agreements, or understandings pertaining to any such matters shall be effective for any purpose. 28.2 Modification. No provision of this Franchise maybe amended or added to except by agreement in writing signed by both of the Parties. 28.3 Assignment. Franchisee shall not have the right to transfer or assign, in whole or in part, any or all of its obligations and rights hereunder without the prior written consent of the Ordinance No. Page 18 of 24 REV 5/12 City. Any assignee shall, within thirty (30) days of the date of any approved assignment, file written notice of the assignment with the City together with its written acceptance of all terms and conditions of this Franchise. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Franchisee shall have the right, without such notice or such written contest, to mortgage its rights, benefits and privileges in and under this Franchise to the Trustee for its bondholders. 28.4 Attorney Fees. In the event the City or the Franchisee defaults on the performance of any terms in this Franchise, and the Franchisee or the City places the enforcement of the Franchise or any part thereof or the collection of any monies due, or to become due hereunder, in the hands of an attorney, or files suit upon the same, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and expenses. The venue for any dispute related to this Franchise shall be King County, Washington. 28.5 No Waiver. Failure of either party to declare any breach or default by the other party immediately upon the occurrence thereof, or delay in taking any action in connection therewith, shall not waive such breach or default, but such party shall have the right to declare any such breach or default at any time. Failure of either party to declare one breach or default does not act as a waiver of such party's right to declare another breach or default. 28.6 Governing Law. This Franchise shall be made in and shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. 28.7 Authorijy. Each individual executing this Franchise on behalf of the City and Franchisee represents and warrants that such individual is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Franchise on behalf of the Franchisee or the City. Ordinance No. Page 19 of 24 REV 5/12 28.8 Notices. Any notices required to be given by the City to Franchisee or by Franchisee to the City shall be delivered to the parties at the following addresses: Franchisee: Tacoma Public Utilities P.O. Box 11007 Tacoma, WA 98411 -0007 City: City of Federal Way Attn: City Attorney 33325 8t' Ave South Federal Way, WA 98063 Any notices may be delivered personally to the addressee of the notice or may be deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the address set forth herein. Any notice so posted in the United States mail shall be deemed received three (3) days after the date of mailing. 28.9 Captions. The respective captions of the sections of this Franchise are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed to modify or otherwise affect in any respect any of the provisions of this Franchise. 28.10 Remedies Cumulative. Any remedies provided for under the terms of this Franchise are not intended to be exclusive but shall be cumulative with all other remedies available to the City at law, in equity or by statute. Section 29. Severability Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this chapter, or its application to any person or situation, be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter or its application to any other person or situation. The City Council of the City of Federal Way hereby declares that it would Ordinance No. Page 20 of 24 REV 5/12 have adopted this chapter and each section, subsection, sentence, clauses, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 30. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener /clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto. Section 31. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 32. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of 2012. ATTEST: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, SKIP PRIEST Ordinance No. Page 21 of 24 REV 5/12 CITY CLERK, CAROL MCNEILLY, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO.: Ordinance No. Page 22 of 24 REV 5/12 ACCEPTANCE: The undersigned hereby accepts all the rights and privileges of the above granted Franchise and acknowledges that such rights and privileges are subject to and limited by all of the terms, conditions and obligations contained therein. DATED this day of , 2012. By: Its: Ordinance No. Page 23 of 24 REV 5 /12 City of Federal Way Tacoma Water Service Area & Second Supply Pipeline Map Date: August, 2012 City of Federal Way Federal Way, Wa. 98003 (P)253-835-7000 (W) www.cityoffederalway.com `CITY OF This map is intended for use 0 0.5 1 as a graphical representation. � � Federal Way Miles The City of Federal Way makes N no warranty as to its accuracy. R \erike\PVV�Streets\ProjectsWgreeme