AG 92-133 - KING COUNTY, CITY OF SEATTLE, AND SUBURBAN CITIES AND TOWNS IN KING COUNTY AGREEMENT AMONG KING COUNTY, THE CITY OF SEATTLE,
AND SUBURBAN CITIES AND TOWNS IN KING COUNTY
FOR THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL
OF KING COUNTY
This Agreement is entered into among King County, a political
subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as
the "County"; the City of Seattle, municipal corporation of the
State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "Seattle", and
suburban cities and towns of King County, all municipal
corporations of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as
"Suburban Cities".
WHEREAS RESHB 1025 adopted in 1991 requires that, through a process
agreed to by the County, Seattle, and Suburban Cities, the
legislative authority of the County adopt a county-wide planning
policy by July 1, 1992, and
WHEREAS the County, Seattle, and Suburban Cities have developed a
collaborative process to produce the county-wide planning policy,
and
WHEREAS this Agreement is authorized by the Interlocal Agreement
Act, RCW 39.34,
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties mutually agree as follows:
1. Definitions.
a. Suburban Cities: Cities and towns in King County other
than the City of Seattle.
b. County-wide Planning Policy (CPP) : The written policy
statement or statements used solely for establishing a
county-wide framework from which County, Seattle, and
Suburban City comprehensive plans are developed and
adopted, thus promoting comprehensive plans which are
consistent as required by RCW 36.70A.100.
2. Establishment of the Growth Management Planning Council and.
Staff. In order to establish the Growth Management Planning
Council and provide staff, the parties shall designate the
following elected official members and staff. To the extent
possible, the parties' designees shall have a broad geographic
representation.
a. Membership for the Growth Management Planning Council.
(GMPC) .
1) Seattle shall designate three members to exercise
three votes;
-1-
ORIGINAL
2) Suburban Cities shall designate six members to
exercise three votes;
3) King County shall designate six members, one of
whom will be the King County Executive, to exercise
six votes.
b. Staff to the GMPC.
1) Each party shall designate staff to form an
interjurisdictional team to provide staff to the
GMPC. The County shall have designated staff of
the King County Council and designated staff of the
King County Executive. The staff designated by the
Executive shall serve as lead for the
interjurisdictional team through initial
ratification.
2) The GMPC shall select a coordinator specifically to
handle its administrative and procedural matters.
3. County-wide Planning Policy Development. Adoption Process and
Ratification Process. The GMPC shall develop and recommend to
the King County Council a proposed CPP. Following a public
hearing, the King County Council shall adopt an ordinance
approving a CPP. King County then shall circulate the CPP for
ratification. The CPP shall be deemed adopted for purposes of
the RCW 36.70A.210 when it has been ratified by ordinance or
resolution of a) at least thirty percent (30%) of the number
of city and county governments in King County and b) such
governments represent at least seventy percent (70%) of the
population of King County. Adoption of the CPP by King County
shall constitute ratification on behalf of the population of
unincorporated King County. Each city shall by ordinance or
resolution either ratify the CPP or disapprove the CPP. A
city shall be deemed to have ratified the CPP unless, within
ninety days of its adoption by King County, the city by
legislative action disapproVes the CPP.
4. Function and Authority of GMPC.
a. The GMPC shall recommend to the King County Council the
county-wide planning policy in a form and with content to
comply with applicable State law. The recommended
planning policy from the GMPC shall address issues and
concerns obtained from review and comment during its
public review process. At a minimum, the CPP shall
address the following: policies to implement RCW
36.70A. 110; policies for promotion of contiguous and
orderly development and provision of urban services to
such development; policies for siting public capital
facilities of a county-wide or state-wide nature;
-2-
policies for county-wide transportation facilities and
strategies; policies that consider the need for
affordable housing, such as housing for all economic
segments of the population and parameter for its
distribution; policies for joint county and city planning
within urban growth area; policies for county-wide
economic development and employment; and an analysis of
the fiscal impact.
b. The GMPC shall devise and the parties shall comply with
a locally based conflict resolution process which will be
directed at conflicts which may arise from the work of
the GMPC.
c. The GMPC shall devise and the parties shall comply with
a process to amend the CPP that is adopted. Amendments
to the CPP shall be adopted and ratified in the same
manner as provided in Section 3 above.
5. Funding for Staff of the GMPC. The parties recognize that
under a separate Agreement which allocates the State Growth
Management Act grant dollars among King County, Seattle, and
Suburban Cities funds are set aside for the development of the
CPP.
6. Duration. This Agreement shall become effective upon
execution by both parties and shall remain in force and effect
until completion of the designated duties of the GMPC,
provided that a party may withdraw from this Agreement with
sixty (60) days notice to the County and to all Suburban City
members which notice may not be given prior to October 1,
1992. Withdrawal of any party will not affect the status of
any adopted CPP, or any adopted amendments thereto.
7. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended by mutual written
agreement of the parties.
8. Entire Agreement. The parties agree that this Agreement is
the complete expression of the terms hereto and any oral
representations or understandings not incorporated herein are
excluded. The parties recognize that time is of the essence
in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement.
9. State Relationship. A copy of this Agreement shall be filed
with the Washington State Department of Community Development.
-3-
R
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has b n executed by:
t/1"- ---' '''..-D:W
City of Federali*ay King County Executive
By: J. Brent M?1 .r
City Manager
Date: 406e.7 .21, /e/04- Date: //A42•
Approved as to form: Approved as to form:
/ 0 /
aro ake Prosecut ng Attorney
Acting City Attorney
IA\ICATHLRER OMPC.AOR
-4-
•
King County
Budget Division
Office of
Financial Management
400 King County Courthouse
516 Third Avenue
Seattle,Washington 98104
(206)296-3434
November 5, 1992
To the Mayors of the following Cities:
Redmond SeaTac Federal Way Kirkland North Bend
RE: GMPC Interlocal Agreement
Dear Mayor:
Enclosed for your permanent record is an original copy of the signed Interlocal Agreement
between King County and your city regarding Growth Management Planning Council. This
May 27 agreement clarifies the ratification process, and acknowledges that the GMPC will have
duties beyond July 1, 1992.
This document has been filed with the King County Records and Elections Section, and has also
been transmitted for filing to the Secretary of State, as required under R.C.W. 39.34.040.
Please contact me at 296-3477 if you have any questions on this matter.
Sincerely,
Carol Gagnat
Regional Affairs Coordinator
CG:jwr
contracts/
template.cit
Enclosure
.
CITY OF =
• /9‘. /q
2 - 3-1
NY\) Fl IrIV 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH • FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003
I
August 24, 1992
Judy Chapman
Budget Department
King County Courthouse
Room 400
516-3rd Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104
Growth Management Agreement
Dear Judy:
Enclosed herewith please find the original agreement approved by the City Council and signed
by the appropriate persons. Will you please return the document to my attention in the City
Clerk's Office following County approval.
Thank you for your assistance.
S'. - ely,
d
de'
r
N. Christine Green
Deputy City Clerk
661-4071
Enclosure
c: Carolyn Lake
Larry Springer
AGREEMENT AMONG KING COUNTY, THE CITY OF SEATTLE, AND
SUBURBAN CITIES AND TOWNS IN KING COUNTY FOR THE GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
5/27/92
This Agreement is entered into among King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington,
hereinafter referred to as the "County"; the City of Seattle, municipal corporation of the State of Washin on,
hereinafter referred to as "Seattle", and suburban cities and towns of King County, all'municipal core ations of
the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "Suburban Cities."
WHEREAS RESHB 1025 adopted in 1991 requires that, through a process agreed to by the C nty, Seattle,
and Suburban Cities, the legislative authority of the County adopt a county-wide planning p. cy by July 1,
• 1992, and
WHEREAS the County, Seattle, and Suburban Cities have developed a collaborative ocess to produce the
county-wide planning policy, and •
•
WHEREAS this agreement is authorized by the Interlocal Agreement.Act, RC 39.34,
I /
• NOW, THEREFORE, the'parties mutually agree as follows: s�, /
1. Definitions.
11 I
a. Suburban Cities: Cities and towns in King County other t,. . the City of Seattle. .�
b. County-wide planning policy (CPP): The written polic statement or statements used solely for
establishing a county-wide framework from which Co .ty, Seattle, and Suburban City comprehensive
plans are developed and adopted, thus promoting comprehensive plans which are consistent as required
by RCW 36.70A.100.
2. Establishment of the Growth Management Planning r ouncil and staff. In order to establish the Growth
Management Planning Council and provide staff, ,e parties shall designate the following elected official
members and staff. To the extent possible, the .rties' designees shall have a broad geographic
representation.
a. Membership for the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC).
1) Seattle shall designate three membe to exercise three votes;
2) Suburban Cities shall designate six .embers to exercise three votes;
3) King County shall designate six -mbers, one of whom will be the King County Executive, to exercise
six votes.
b. Staff to the GMPC.
1) Each party shall designate aff to form an interjurisdictional team to provide staff to the GMPC. The
County shall have design ed staff of the King County Council and designated staff of the King County
Executive. The staff d - gnated by the Executive shall serve as lead for the interjurisdictional team
through initial ratificaf•n.
2) The GMPC shall sel t a coordinator specifically to handle its administrative and procedural matters.
3. County-wide planning ••licy development, adoption process and ratification process. The GMPC shall
develop and recomm- d to the King County Council a proposed CPP. Following a public hearing, the King
County Council sha adopt an ordinance approving a CPP. King County then shall circulate the CPP for
ratification. The 'PP shall be deemed adopted for purposes of the RCW 36.70A.210 when it has been
ratified by ord.., .ce or resolution of a) at least thirty percent (30%) of the number of city and county
governments . King County and b) such governments represent at least seventy percent (70%) of the
population of King County. Adoption of the CPP by King County shall constitute ratification on behalf of
the population of unincorporated King County. Each city shall by ordinance or resolution either ratify the
•
CPP or disapprove the CPP. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the CPP unless, within ninety day of its
adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves the CPP.
4. Function and authority of GMPC.
a. The GMPC shall recommend to the King County Council the county-wide planning policy in a form
and with content to comply with applicable State law. The recommended planning policy from the
GMPC shall address issues and concerns obtained from review and comment during its public review
process. At a minimum, the CPP shall address the following: policies to implement RCW 36.70A.110;
policies for promotion of contiguous and orderly development and provision of urban services to such
development; policies for siting public capital facilities of a county-wide or state-wide nature; policies
for county-wide transportation facilities and strategies; policies that consider the need for affordable
housing, such as housing for all economic segments of the population and parameter for its distribution;
policies for joint county and city planning within urban growth areas; policies for county-wide
economic development and employment; and an analysis of the fiscal impact.
b. The GMPC shall devise and the parties shall comply with a locally based conflict resolution process
which will be directed at conflicts which may arise from the work of the GMPC.
c. The GMPC shall devise and the parties shall comply with a process to amend the CPP that is adopted.
Amendments to the CPP shall be adopted and ratified in the same manner as provided in Section 3
above.
S. Funding for staff of the GMPC. The parties recognize that under a separate agreement which allocates the
State Growth Management Act grant dollars among King County, Seattle, and Suburban Cities funds are set
aside for the development of the CPP.
6. Duration. This agreement shall become effective January 1, 1992 and shall remain in force and effect until
completion of the designated duties of the GMPC, provided that a party may withdraw from this agreement
with sixty (60) days notice to the County which notice may not be given prior to October 1, 1992.
Withdraw of any party will not affect the status of the CPP.
7. Amendments. This agreement may be amended by mutual written agreement of the parties.
8. Entire agreement. The parties agree that this agreement is the complete expression of the terms hereto and
any oral representations or understandings not incorporated herein are excluded. The parties recognize that
time is of the essence in the performance of the provisions of this agreement.
9. State relationship. A copy of this agreement shall be filed with the Washington State Department of
Community Development.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by:
Name of Jurisdiction King County Executive
by:
Approved as to form: Approved as to form:
City Attorney Prosecuting Attorney
• F:\.+prilu4egimalk+o.+th\Gevc9 927/92
•
UMW
lam--C
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
SUBMITTING DEPT: Community Development ............. ...MEETTING DATE: 8/18/92 .� .�.�. �
STAFF CONTACT: Larry Springer CATEGORY: FYI
PHONE: 661-4102 HEARING STAFF REPORT
X CONSENT BUSINESS
_ORDINANCE _PROCLAMATION
RESOLUTION STUDY SESSION
SUBJECT: Growth Management Planning Council BUDGET IMPACT:
Interlocal Agreement Extension Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
_ ........_....r..._...................�................_..........�............_ Contingency Regd...... �.a...$ ........_._....._..._..._.�...........r.
ATTACHMENTS: Agroemrot
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND:
Each city has received a request from Tim Hill to sign a third version of the interlocal agreement establishing
the Growth Management Planning Council. Terry Lukens, SCA President, has requested that this be dome as
soon as possible. This version of the agreement establishes the ratification process for the County wide
Planning Policies and provides a mechanism for amendments to the policies as well as keeps the GMPC in place
through completion of their duties.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize City Manager to sign GMPC Intelocal Agreement
REVIEWED BY: (/`► y Manager City Attorney Asst. City Manager
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY,CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION: DISTRIBUTION AFTER MEETING:
�C APPROVED MANAGER LAW
_DENIED CLERK FINANCE
TABLED/D rr' 5+' ' cM► • ACTION COMM. DEV. _FIRE
DA_ '• .' /-• - 2-- POLICE _PARKS
BY: PUB. WKS. OMER
4.11
34 4
^ !<\
City of ~ "
City Council 455-7810
Bellevue moo? Post Office Box 90012 • Bellevue, Washington • 98009 9012
1lNG'
, '14
0 I-
1 g/P)
Date: June 29, 1992 i / I
To: SCA Members 4
From: Terry Lu, - • - . ' residen, ! I Re: : •wth Management Planning Council Interlocal Agreement �
3rd Version
Each city has received a request from King County Executive Tim Hill to execute a third
version of the interlocal agreement establishing the Growth Management Planning Council
(see attached). I strongly urge you to do so at your earliest convenience. This revised
version establishes the ratification process for the County-wide Planning Policies, and
provides a mechanism for amendments to the policies. The revised interlocal also keeps the
Growth Management Planning Council in place through completion of its duties.
As you may be aware, the County-wide Planning Policies set forth the following the
following tasks and timelines:
o Make Affordable Housing Recommendations August 1, 1992
o Adopt Economic Development Policies December 1, 1992
o Confirm Centers and Adopt Population/Employment Targets December 31, 1992
o Develop Financial Strategy July 1, 1993
o Develop a Regional Industrial Siting Policy July 1, 1993
In addition, the GMPC may consider amendments to the policies upon completion of these
tasks and/or after local jurisdictions have adopted their local comprehensive plans under the
State Growth Management Act.
Cities should forward an executed copy of the agreement to Carol Gagnat, Room 420, King
County Courthouse, 516 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104.
City of Bellevue offices are located at Main Street and 116th Avenue S.E.