LUTC PKT 03-15-2004
City of Federal Way
City Council
Land Use/Transportation Committee
March 15, 2004
5:00 pm PLEASE NOTE TIME CHANGE
City Hall
Council Chambers
REVISED
MEETING AGENDA
1.
CALL TO ORDER
2.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: March 1, 2004, meeting
3.
PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes)
4.
BUSINESS ITEMS
A.
Weyerhaeuser Way and South 336th Street Roundabout
Project Bid Award
Orchid Lane Final Plat and Resolution
West Branch and Main Stem Lakota Creek Restoration Project-
100% Design Approval and Authorization to Bid
South 288th Street at SR 99 Project Access and
Pedestrian Issues
SR 99 at South 333rd Street Median Break
Agreement Between Central Puget Sound Regional Transit
Authority and City of Federal Way for Future Development of
Transit Oriented Development at the Federal Way Transit Center
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
5.
FUTURE MEETINGS/AGENDA ITEMS
ADJOURN
6.
Action Salloum/1S min
Action Harris/10 min
Action Bucich/S min
Action Perez/1S min
Action Perez/20 min
Action Michaelson/20 min
Committee Members
Jack Dove~ Chair
Eric Faison
Michael Park
City Staff
Kathy McClung, Director, Community Development SelVices
£ nna Piety, Administrative Assistant
253-661-4105
KILUTC Agendas and Summaries 2004\March 15,2004, LUTC Agenda doc
City of Federal Way
City Council '
,LandUserri'ànsRortation Corpmittee
",
March 1,2ÒO4 "
5:30 p:m,'~~J;i,i>' ,
"
."
",
City Hall
Council Chambers
MEETING MINUTES
In attendance: Committee Members Jack Dovey, Chair, Eric Faison and Michael Park; Mayor Dean McColgan, Deputy Mayor
Linda Kochmar, Council Member Jim Ferrell; City Manager David Moseley; Community Development Director Kathy McClung,
Public Works Director Cary Roe; Deputy City Attorney Karen Kirkpatrick; Deputy Public Works Director Ken Miller, Street
Systems Manager Marwan Salloum; Surface Water Manager Paul Bucich; Traffic Engineer Rick Perez; Streets Systems
Engineer John Mulkey; Associate Planner Deb Barker; Administrative Assistant Krystal Kelsey,
1,
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Dovey called the meeting to order at 5:33 pm.
2.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The summary minutes of the February 17, 2004 meeting were approved as presented.
3.
PUBLIC COMMENT
There were no public comments.
4.
BUSINESS ITEMS
A. 2004 Asphalt Overlay Project - Bid Award - Marwan Salloum reviewed the LUTC memorandum, available
budget and estimated project costs. Committee Member Faison inquired about the logic of removing Schedules C & F
from the project opposed to other schedules. Mr. Salloum replied that these schedules fit within the budget shortfall.
Historically, deleted schedules have been completed during the course of the overlay project because of lower unit costs
and because budgeted contingencies were not utilized.
Committee Members inquired about "in-house" design charges, specifically asking how those funds are budgeted and
represented to the Council. Committee Members raised a concern that Council is presented with staff costs twice -
once during the budget process and again inCommiU.ee whel1costsare,charged to capital ~nd project budgets.
Mr. Salloum and Mr. Moseley clarified that certain staff, including those that designed and prepared this project, are
solely or partly paid directly out of capital and project budgets, Such employees are shown as paid out of the CIP or
project accounts during the budget process and not the general fund.
Deputy Mayor Kochmar asked why the engineer's estimate was so much higher than the actual project costs. Mr.
Salloum replied that staff deliberately design more project schedules than the budget can cover in case construction
bids come in much lower than expected. This allows the City to incorporate any deleted schedules back into the project
if funding allows.
Chair Dovey asked how the deleted projects would affect mobilization with other schedules. Mr. Salloum explained that
when deciding which schedules to delete, staff consider "neighboring" schedules. These neighboring schedules are
scheduled for completion toward the end of the project when staff are likely able to determine that the deleted schedules
could be added back in. This provides an incentive to the contractor to agree to complete the deleted schedules and
allows the project to flow more smoothly by avoiding mobilization in the same general area multiple times.
Mr. Salloum also clarified that the contract and bid documents clearly state that one or more schedules may be deleted
from the project; contractors have historically completed any added schedules while honoring their bid prices.
The Committee m/s/c recommendation to approve at the next meeting on March 16,2004 award of all schedules of the
2004 Asphalt Overlay Project except Schedules C & F, authorize the City Manager to execute the contract, and approve
adding all or a portion of the deleted schedules back into the project as funding allows.
G:ILUTC - Kryslal'sI3-1-04 LUTC Minutes.doc
B. Lakota Wetland Regional Stormwater Facility Improvements Project -100% Design Approval and
Authorization to Bid - Paul Bucich addressed the Committee and presented the 100% Design Approval for their
consideration. Using an aerial map as a visual aid, Mr. Bucich familiarized the Committee with the scope of the
project and the area of land staff is negotiating to purchase, approximately 12 acres.
Committee member Park asked Mr. Bucich about the amount of wetlands on the project; Mr. Bucich replied that
approximately eight of the 12 acres are considered wetlands and/or their affiliated buffers. Committee member
Park asked if the property owner understands that much of his land is wetlands and the subsequent affect to the
value of his property. Mr. Bucich replied affirmatively.
Chair Dovey asked if the City would be able to go above the appraised value; Mr, Bucich answered "yes." Chair
Dovey inquired about purchasing only the wetlands and asked how doing so would affect the project the owner's
willingness to sell. Mr. Bucich replied that the project would be possible with only the purchase of the wetlands,
however, it would be difficult for staff to appraise the wetlands alone.
There was discussion about the benefit to the park system, the benefit or detriment to neighboring homeowners, the
current owner's previous attempts to develop the land, and the ability to develop the land if the City were to
purchase the wetlands only.
The Committee inquired about the status of the City's per capita parks ratio of 10.9 acres. Mr. Moseley replied
despite the recent dedication of the Hylebos park, the parks per capita goal has not been met.
Although Chair Dovey recognized the benefit to the Parks Department, he remained unconvinced that this project
should be a vehicle for purchasing the extra acreage. Council Member Ferrell also expressed his concern about
purchasing more land than is needed for project completion. The Committee asked staff for more justification to
purchase the entire 12 acres.
Mr. Bucich and Mr. Roe both expressed a shared opinion that it is sensible to purchase the property in its entirety
now because of a willing seller and the benefit to the Parks system. Committee Members asked if the King County
Conservation Grant would be impacted by purchasing the wel1ands only; Mr. 13ucjcf1 answered, Mno., the grant
would not be impacted.
In summary, Mr. Bucich shared that 100% of the flooding problems that currently exist will be resolved by this
project, that this project will benefit the Mirror Lake Basin, that the project has been designed with projects down-
stream in mind and is part of a solution to the entire system.
Chair Dovey expressed his concern that in future the Committee should also be presented with the minimum
fequirements/needs to complete all projects and alse-prøvidetheGommittee witha'separatefeœmmeAdationfor
any added benefits or desired gains.
The Committee m/s/c recommendation to approve atlhe next meeting on MarCh 16, 2004 the '100"/0 design stage,
authorize the City Manager to negotiate a purchase price not to exceed the appraised value, and authorize staff to
bid the project and return to Council for permission to award the project.
C. 23'd Avenue South and South 314th Street (Private Road) Traffic Signal Project -100% Design Approval and
Authorization to Bid-
Ken Miller addressed the Committee, and presented a visual exhibit of the project, including the locations of the
crosswalks and signalization. Mr. Miller clarified for the Committee that Target would not charge the City for the
easement it is granting; likely because the project is directly benefiting their customers,
Mr, Miller further clarified that this project is not a result of the Sound Transit project; it is a result of numerous
complaints from pedestrians and residents of the senior housing center.
Deputy Mayor Kochmar commented that she was very pleased with the project. Deputy Mayor Kochmar has visited
several times with residents of the senior center and realizes how difficult it is for them to navigate the area on not
only on foot, but is even more difficult using walkers and in wheelchairs.
The Committee mlslc recommendation to approve at the next meeting on March 16,2004 the 100% design stage
and authorize staff to bid the project, returning to the City Council for authority to award the project to the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder.
5.
FUTURE MEETINGS
The next scheduled meeting is March 15, 2004,
6.
ADJOURN
G:\LUTC - Krystal's\3-1-O4 LUTC Minutes.doc
The meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m.
G:\LUTC - Krystal's\3-1-O4 LUTC Minutes.doc
~~ Fëderal Way
DATE:
March 15, 2004
TO:
Jack Dovey, Chair
Land Use and Transportation Committee
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
Weyerhaeuser Way and S 336th Street Roundabout Project - Bid Award
BACKGROUND:
Thirteen bids were received and opened on March 2, 2004 for the Weyerhaeuser Way Roundabout Project (see
attached Bid Tabulation Summary). The apparent low bidder is Sanders General Construction Co.
Reference checks on Sanders General Construction Co. by City staff indicate that the contractor has successfully
performed similar work. As a result, City staff believe Sanders General ConstrtiGtion Co. can sucœssfully
complete this project to the City's satisfaction. Therefore the lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Sanders
General Construction Co. in the amount of $643,487.00.
PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES:
Construction Low Bid
10% Construction Contingency
12% Construction Management
Planning and Design
Right of Way Acquisition and Title Reports
$643,487
64,349
77,218
178,113 For both roundabout&turn ßnes
2 500 All required right of way will be dedicated by the
, Weyerhaeuser Company
3,500
$969,167
Printing and Advertising
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS
AVAILABLE FUNDING:
Weyerhaeuser Company
$519,910 SO% of project cost for roundabout and 100%
of project cost for design of turn lanes
Transfer in Street CIP Fund
Transfer in Overlay Fund
Mitigation
Interest Earning
TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET
21S,999
59,000
168,414
20,042
$983,365
PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE
$14,198
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends placing the following items on the April 6, 2004 Council Consent Agenda for approval:
1. Award the Weyerhaeuser Way Roundabout Project to Sanders General Construction Co., the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $643,487.00, and approve a 10% contingency of
$64,349.00 for a total of $707,836.00.
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.
APPROVAL OF COMMIITEE REPORT:
"".""""""-"""""".'...""."""""""""'.."'."".'.."".""'.""."m."'.'.""'-"..,."""",".-"..",..."".,,-
, , ,
, , ,
..."."""'m""".."'."."..".""."""""-".""'__..m..'.."'_"'.'"""_'.m_."m".."..,".'.".m..m........-
, ,
"...."..""""..mm."""".".'.'..'mm"..."'.'.'...""..",.,-".m
')~ck Dovey, Chait
Michael Park; Member
Eric Faison, Member
k:\lutc\2004\Weyerhaueser Roundabout Project. Bid award.doc
cc:
Project File
Central File
Weyerhaeuser Way and S 336th Street
Roundabout Intersection Improvements
RFB No. 04.107
BID OPENING DATE MARCH 2, 2004
I Bid 2 Bid 3 Bid4 Bid 5 Bid 6 Bid7
Vendor Name ...> Rodarte ConStruction. Inc, Wagner Del/Olopment Denn~ R Craig Constr" Inc, C, W Williams Contc. Co, Gary Mertino ConStr, Co.. Inc Construct Co
Location .-----....> Aubum. WA La.ewood, WA ,WA Federal Wa . WA Seattle. WA Sumner. WA
nem Amount Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total
SCHEDULf A ' SOUTH 312TH STREET
1 Mobilization I CO 515.000,00 515,000,00 525.000,00 525,000,00 $44.948,00 $44,948.00 551,225.00 551,225,00 520.00000 520.00000 540,000,00 540,000,00
2 Traffoc Control Labor 320 -~ 535,00 511 .200,00 535,00 511 ,200,00 $35,00 $11.200,00 $35,00 $1 I ,200,00 535,00 $11.200,00 $3500 $11 ,20000
3 Construction Surve~ng ,,;.; 511.500,00 $11 ,500,00 $11,50000 $11.500,00 $10,975,00 $10,975,00 $13.065,00 $13.065,00 510.000,00 $10,000,00 $11 ,82972 $11 ,82972
4 Clearing and Grubbing I -" $2,000,00 $2.000,00 $5,000.00 $5.000,00 $10.220,00 510.220,00 53,300,00 $3.300,00 $15.000,00 $15.000,00 $8.04780 58.04760
5 Roads;;e Cleanup 1 '" $3.000,00 $3,000.00 $3,000,00 $3,000,00 $3,000.00 $3,000,00 53,000,00 53.000,00 53.000,00 $3.00000 $3.00000 $3,00000
6 UtI,"y Potholing t rA $1,500.00 $1,500,00 $1,500,00 $1,500.00 $1,500,00 $1,500,00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1.500.00 $1,500,00 $1.500,00 $1,500,00
7 Resolution ot E>dsting Uti,"y Conmcts I FA $5.000,00 $5,000.00 $5,000,00 $5,000,00 $5.000,00 $5,000.00 $5.000.00 $5.000,00 55.000,00 $5.000,00 $5,000,00 55,000,00
8 Roadway E>«:avation, Including Haul 2892 cv $14,00 $40,488,00 $14,00 $40,488,00 $10,90 $31.522,60 515,40 $44,536,80 $10,00 $28.92000 514,87 $43.00404
9 PlanIng Biluminous Pal/Oment 362 ~v $15,00 . $5.430,00 $12,00 $4.344,00 $11.70 $4,235,40 512,10 $4.380,20 $10,00 $3.620,00 $12.45 $4.506,90
10 Gral/OI Borrow, Including Haul 2200 -, $11,00 $24,200,00 $11.00 $24,200,00 $10,90 $23.980,00 $11 .00 $24.200,00 514,00 $30,800,00 $14,26 $31,372.00
11 Crushed Surtacing Top Course 3000 ", 516.00 $54,000,00 $14,00 $42.000,00 $16,60 $49,800,00 $16,50 $49.500,00 $18,00 $54.000,00 517,06 $51.180,00
12 Asphalt Concrele Pa""ment CI A 4010 -, 545,00 $180,450.00 $43,00 5172,430.00 $41,30 $165,613,00 $41.40 $166.014,00 $43,00 $172.430,00 $45,51 5162.495,10
13 Catcn 8asin Type I 10 ; ~ 5800,00 $8,000,00 $750,00 $7,500,00 $770.00 57,700,00 $665,00 $6.650,00 51.100,00 $11.000,00 $834,73 58.34730
14 Catch 8asinType2-48 In Diam 4 ëA 51,600,00 $7.200,00 $1,850,00 $7.400,00 $1.540.00 $6.160,00 51.600.00 $8,400,00 51,800,00 57.20000 $2,006,01 58.02404
15 Storm filter 1 -~ 536.000,00 $36.000,00 536.000,00 $36.000,00 $4 I .330,00 $41.33000 $38.520.00 $38.520.00 535,000,00 $35.000,00 $37,996,69 $37.996,69
16 Corrugaled Polyethylene Storm Sewer Pipe. 8" Diam 320 -= $21,00 $6.720.00 $19,00 $6,080.00 $21,70 $6.944.00 $26.80 $8.576.00 $40,00 $12.800,00 $15,80 $4,992,00
17 Corrugated Polyethylene Storm Sewer Pipe 12" Diam 995 L' 526,00 $25,870.00 $30,00 $29,850,00 525,95 525;820,25 $28,30 $28.158,50 $45.00 $44.775,00 $2738 $27,243,10
18 Gral/OI Borrow for Trench 8ackfill 12OO -, $900 510,800,00 $8,00 $9,60000 $1190 $14.280,00 $10.25 $12.300,00 $15,00 $18.000,00 51426 $17,11200
19 Crushed Surtacing Top Course for TrenCh 8ackfill 620,00" $12,00 $7.440,00 $10,00 $6,200,00 $18,60 $10.292,00 $13,25 $8.21500 $20,00 $12.40000 517,06 510.577.20
20 Ra~e Water Vail/O Box 1 lA $200,00 $200,00 $225,00 $225.00 $175,00 $175,00 $220,00 $220,00 $350,00 $350,00 $205,52 5205,52
21 Adjust Manlto'e 2 [A $300,00 $600.00 $300,00 $600,00 $450,00 $900,00 5275,00 $550,00 $500,00 $1,000,00 $40912 $818.24
22 Resetting Existing Hydrants I ,A $800,00 $800,00 $1,300,00 $1,300,00 $1.850,00 51,850,00 51,440.00 $1,440,00 $1.200,00 $1.20000 $1,283,48 $1.283.48
23 Mo...ng Existing Hydrants I ;;A 51.100,00 $1.100,00 51.500.00 $1.500,00 $2,770.00 $2.770,00 51,610.00 $1.610,00 $2,000,00 $2,00000 $1.224,64 $1,224,64
24 Adjust Monument Case & COl/Or 3 ~;. $200,00 $600,00 $250,00 $750.00 $325,00 $975,00 $220,00 $660,00 $350,00 $1.050,00 $90,56 5271,68
25 Ra~e Junction Box 2 fA $200.00 $400,00 $400,00 $600,00 $425,00 $650,00 $330,00 $660,00 $350.00 $700,00 $283,01 556602
26 Cement Conc, Bamer Curb 440 L< $8,00 $3,520.00 $17,00 $7,480,00 $10,80 $4,752,00 $18.00 $7.920,00 $12,00 $5.280,00 $9,61 54.228,40
27 Cement Conc, Barrier Curb and Gulter 1.114 cF $8.00 $8,912.00 $13,00 514,482,00 $10.20 $11.362,80 $12.50 $13,925.00 $15,00 $16.710,00 $9,61 $10.70554
28 Type A Precast TraffIC Curb 733 ..1' $12,00 $8.796,00 $13,00 $9,529.00 $12.90 $9,455,70 $14,25 $10,445,25 $13,00 $9.529,00 $13,56 59,954 14
29 Cemenl Cone, S;;ewalk 1.003 ',v $17,00 $17,051.00 $19,00 $19,057,00 $22,50 $22,587.50 $21,20 $21.263,60 $27,00 $27.081,00 51895 $19,00685
30 Topsoil, Type A 230 C. $25.00 $5,750,00 $23,00 $5,290,00 $25,20 $5.796.00 $25,85 $5.945,50 $25,00' $5.750,00 $2490 $5,72700
31 Seeding and MulClting 0,5 ~~~: 52.600,00 $1,400,00 $1,200,00 $600,00 $3,200,00 51,600,00 51,304,00 $652,00 $7.000,00 $3.500,00 $1,573,97 $78699
32 Landscaping 1." $45,000,00 $45.000.00 $45.500.00 $45,500,00 $39,970.00 539,970,00 545,360,00 $45.360,00 $40,000,00 $40.000.00 $44,132,20 $44132,20
33 Contractor Designed Irrigation System, Complele 1_" $5,000,00 $5,000,00 $16.000.00 $16.000,00 $10.970.00 510.970,00 519,000,00 $19,000,00 $4.60000 $4,800,00 $5.213,00 55.213.00
34 Ra~ed p"",ment Marker, Type 1 6 "-".' $20000 $1.280,00 $215,00 $1.376,00 $215.00 $1.376,00 $238,00 $1.523,20 $220,00 $1.408.00 $226,41 $1.44902
35 Ra~ed Pa""ment Marker, Type 2 1 ""~.' $300,00 $360,00 5320,00 $384,00 $321.00 $385,20 $360.00 $432,00 $320,00 $384,00 $339,61 $40753
36 Hydrant Marker, Type 2B 2 => $3,00 $6,00 $5,00 $10,00 $15,30 $30,60 $12,50 $25.00 $50,00 510000 $5,66 $11,32
37 Painted line 1.485 . < $1.00 $1,485.00 $0.25 $371,25 $0.23 5341,55 $0,25 5371,25 $0,25 $37125 $0,23 5341,55
38 Plast~ line 3,850 I; $2.00 $7.300.00 $1.85 $8,022,50 $1.62 $5.913,00 $1.80 $8,570,00 $1.60 $5.840,00 $171 $6.241 ,50
39 Plast" Crosswalk line 360 l = $3,00 $1,080,00 $4,00 $1,440.00 $4,10 $1.476.00 $4,45 $1.802,00 $4,00 $1,440.00 $4,25 $1.530,00
40 Remol/O Striping 920 C= $1,00 $920,00 $0,50 $460,00 $0,58 $533,60 $0.60 $552,00 $0,50 $460,00 5057 5524,40
41 Plast~ Pa""menl Marking 15 i'- : $30,00 $450,00 $50,00 5750,00 551.20 $766,00 $53,50 580250 $5000 $750,00 $50,94
5764,10
42 Relocate E>Osting Sign 16 ~. $140.00 $2.520,(10 5100,00 $1,600.00 $95,00 $1,710,00 514600 $2,628,00 $150,00 $2,700,00 $226,41 $4,075.38
43 Proposed Sign age 213~' i. $50,00 $10,650,00 $40.00 $6,520,00 $8,20 $1.746,60 $26.25 $5.591.25 $30,00 $6,390.00 $6243 $13,29759
44 IIluminat"n System Complele I I A $82.000,00 $82,000,00 $75.000,00 $75.000,00 $71,220.00 $71.220,00 $69,550.00 $69,550,00 565,000,00 $65.000.00 $73.205,00 573.205,00
45 Temporary TraffIC Control De...ces I C; 59.000,00 $9,000,00 $6.000,00 $8,000,00 $19.320,00 $19,320.00 $17,500.00 $17.500,00 524.000.00 $24.000,00 $19.657,71 $19.65771
46 Silt Fence 468 IF $5,00 $2,440.00 $4,00 $1.952,00 $3,00 $1.464,00 $4,00 $1,952,00 $5,00 $2.440,00 $3,46 $1,688,48
47 Temporary Water PoliutioniEroSlon Control I FA 53.000,00 $3 000.00 53.000.00 $3000,00 $3.000,00 $3 bOO.OO 53.000,00 $3000,00 $3,000,00 $3,000.00 $3.000,00 $3,000,00
TOTAL $677,411.00 $676,490.76 $697 799.00 $727,491.06 $729,171.25 $737,744,97
I .
Copies Submitted I" ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE
B<1 Sognalure I YES YES YES YES YES YES
B<1 Bond YES YES YES YES YES YES
References NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA
Bid amount = $658,83700
Difference = $15,35000
Pge1of2
Weyerhaeuser Way and S 336th Street
Roundabout Intersection Improvements
RFB No. 04.107
BID OPENING DATE MARCH 2, 2004
Bld8 Bid 9 Bid 10 Bid11 Bid 12 Bid13
Vendor Name m> DLB Earthwor1< Co, Road Cons\r, NW.In<:, WOSlwaler Constr, Co, Goodfellow Bros,. Inc. T, Miller Construction PNena Bros, Construction Engineers Estimate
Location ___m....> Olvrnoia. WA Renton. WA Auoom. WA Maole ValleY WA Aubum WA Sumner. WA
hem Amount Un~ Price Total Price Total Price Tolal Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total
SCHEDULE A" SOUTH 312TH STREET
1 Mobilization I LS $39.286.00 $39.286.00 $55.000,00 $55.000.00 $30.000,00 $30.000,00 $70.000.00 $70.000,00 $90.000,00 $90.000.00 $50.000,00 $50,000,00 $50,00000 $50.00000
2 Traffc Control Labor 320 HR $35,00 $11.200,00 $35,00 $11,200.00 $35.00 $11.200.00 $35,00 $11.200,00 $35,00 $11.200,00 $35,00 $11.200,00 $35,00 $11,20000
3 Construction SuOlOying 1 LS $11.300,00 $11,300,00 $17,000.00 $17.000.00 $12.000.00 $12,000.00 $15.000,00 $15,000.00 $14.000.00 $14,000,00 $13.000,00 $13.000,00 $10.00000 $10.000,00
4 Clearing and Grubbing I LS $12.590,00 $12,590.00 $17,000.00 $17.000,00 $8.000,00 $8.000,00 $6,000,00 $6.000.00 $9.000,00 $9.000,00 $5.500,00 $5.500.00 $1.000,00 $1.000,00
5 Roadside Cleanup 1 FA $3,000,00 $3.000.00 $3,000,00 $3,000.00 $3.000,00 $3,000,00 $3,000.00 $3,000,00 $3.000,00 $3.000,00 $3,000,00 $3,000,00 $3,00000 $3,00000
6 Uti'"y Pothollng 1 FA $1.500,00 $1,500,00 $1.500,00 $1,500,00 $1.500,00 $1.500,00 $1,500,00 $1,500,00 $1,500.00 $1.500,00 $1.500,00 $1,50000 $1,500,00 $1.500,00
7 Resolution 01 E>ósting Ulilny Connicts I FA $5,000,00 $5,000,00 $5,000,00 $5,000,00 $5.000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000,00 $5.000,00 $5,000.00 $5,000,00 $5.000,00 $5.000,00 $5,000,00 $5,000,00
8 Roadway E.=vation, Including Haul 2892 CY $23,50 $67,962.00 $17,00 $49,164:00 $20,00 $57.840.00 $21,50 $62.178.00 $25,00 $72.300,00 $22,00 $63.624,00 $12,00 $34,70400
g Planing 8numinous Pawment 362 SY $11,00 $3.982.00 $25,00 $9,050,00 $11.00 $3,982,00 $8,50 $3,077.00 $12,00 $4,344,00 $13.00 $4,706,00 $20,00 $7.240,00
10 Grawl 80rrow, Including Haul 2200 TN $10,30 $22,660,00 $13,00 $28.600.00 $8.00 $17,600,00 $17.00 $37,400,00 $25,00 $55,000.00 $12,00 $26.400,00 $12,00 $26.400,00
11 Crushed Surfacing Top Course 3000 TN $14,71 $44.f30,OO $20.00 $60,000.00 $10.00 $30,000,00 $14.00 $42,000,00 $18,00 $54.000,00 $18,00 $54,000,00 $16,00 $48.000,00
12 Aspha~ Concrete Pawment CI A 4010 TN $43,00 $172,430,00 $44,00 $176,440,00 $50,00 $200.500,00 $45,00 $180.450,00 $40,00 $160.400,00 $47,00 $188,470,00 $42,00 $168.420,00
13 Catch 8asin Type I 10 EA $950,00 $9,500,00 $900,00 $9,000,00 $1.000,00 $10.000.00 $1,250.00 $12.500.00 $700,00 $7,000,00 $850.00 $8.500.00 $800,00 $8.000,00
14 Catch Basin Type 2 - 48 In Diam 4EA $2.290,00 $9,160,00 $4,500.00 $18.000,00 $2.000,00 $6,000.00 $2,500,00 $10,000.00 $2,000,00 $8.000,00 $1.500.00 $6.000.00 $2.500,00 $10.000.00
15 Stormmter I LS $39.997,00 $39.997,00 $30.000.00 $30,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000,00 $40.000,00 $40,000,00 $37.000.00 $37,000,00 $60.000,00 $60.000.00 $40.000.00 $40.000,00
16 Corrugated Polyeth~ene Storm Sewer Pipe. 8" Dlam 320 LF $27,10 $8,672,00 $27,00 $8,640 00 $60,00 $19,200,00 $40.00 $12,800,00 $39.00 $12,480,00 $18,00 $5.760,00 $20,00 $6.400,00
17 Corrugated Polyeth~ene Storm Sewer Pipe 12" Diam 995 LF $31,20 $31.044,00 $33,00 $32,835,00 $70,00 $69,650,00 $40,00 $39,600,00 $46.00 $45.770.00 $30,00 $29.850,00 $24,00 $23.880,00
18 Grawl Borrow fo< Trench Backfill 1200 TN $12,67 $15,204,00 $13,00 $15,600,00 $8,00 $9.600,00 $14,50 $17.400,00 $17.00 $20.400,00 $12,00 $14.400,00 $15,00 $18.000,00
19 Crushed Surfacing Top Course lor Trench Backfill 620,00 TN $14,81 $9,182,20 $20,00 $12.400,00 $10,00 $6.200.00 $16,00 $9.920,OO $20.00 $12.400,00 $18,00 $11.160,00 $20,00 $12,40000
20 Ra$e Water Valw Box lEA $275,00 $275.00 $1,000.00 $1,000,00 $200,00 $200,00 $375.00 $375.00 $150,00 $\50,00 $225.00 $225.00 $150.00 $150,00
21 Adjust Manhole 2EA $525,00 $1,050.00 $1,000.00 $2,000,00 $500.00 $1,000,00 $400,00 $800.00 $500,00 $1.000,00 $500,00 $1.000.00 $400.00 $800,00
22 Resening E>ósting H)'!rants 1 EA $872.00 $872.00 $1,500,00 $1,500,00 $1.500.00 $1.500,00 $2.000.00 $2.000.00 $800,00 $800,00 $750.00 $750,00 $1.50000 $1,50000
23 MoWlg E>ósting Hydrants 1 EA $1.183,00 $1,183.00 $1.500,00 $1,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500,00 $2,000.00 $2.000,00 $1.600,00 $1,600.00 $\ .250,00 $1.250,00 $2,000,00 $2,000,00
24 Adjust Monument CaSe & Cowr 3EA $525,00 $1,575.00 $1,000,00 $3,000.00 $-100,00 $1,200,00 $350.00 $1,050,00 $200.00 $600.00 $-100,00 $1.200.00 $15000 $45000
25 Raise Junction Box 2EA $125,00 $250,00 $1,000,00 $2,000,00 $200.00 $-100.00 $1.100.00 $2.200,00 $100,00 $200.00 $500,00 $1,000,00 $300,00 $60000
26 Cemenl Conc, Barrier Curt> 440 LF $20,80 $9,152,00 $17,00 $7.480,00 $20,00 $8,800.00 $21,00 $9,240,00 $8.00 $3,520,00 $18,00 $7.920,00 $900 $3,960,00
27 Cement Conc, Barrier Curt> and Guner 1.114 LF $14,00 $15,596,00 $17,00 $18.938,00 $18,00 $20,052,00 $13,00 $14.482,00 $10,00 $11.140,00 $12,00 $13.368,00 $1200 $13,368,00
28 Type A Precast Trafftc Curt> 733 LF $13.00 $9.529.00 $15,00 $10,995.00 $12,00 $8,796,00 $14,00 $10.262,00 $11.50 $8,429,50 $10,50 $7,696,50 $18,00 $13,19400
29 Cement Conc, Sidewalk 1.003 SY $23.00 $23,069.00 $27,00 $27,081.00 $40,00 $40,120,00 $29.00 $29,087.00 $20,00 $20.060,00 $24,00 $24.072.00 $20,00 $20,080,00
30 Topsoil. Type A 230 CY $25,00 $5.750,00 $20,00 $4,600,00 $40,00 $9,200,00 $25.00 $5,750,00 $23,00 $5.290,00 $30,00 $6.900,00 $4000 $9.200,00
31 Seeding and Mulching 0,5 ACRE $1.200,00 $600,00 $1.000,00 $500,00 $2,500,00 $1.250,00 $1.300.00 $650,00 $3,425,00 $1.712.50 $600.00 $300,00 $2,500,00 $1.250,00
32 LandscapIng 1 LS $46,700,00 $-16,700,00 $39.000,00 $39.000,00 $42,000,00 $42,000,00 $40.000,00 $40.000,00 $40.000.00 $40.000.00 $49.000,00 $49,000,00 $40.000,00 $40,000,00
33 Contractor Designed Imgation Syslem, Complete I LS $15.600,00 $15.600,00 $7.000,00 $7,000,00 $5.000,00 $5.000.00 $5.500,00 $5.500,00 $9.000,00 $9,000,00 $15.000,00 $15.000,00 $14.000,00 $14,000,00
34 Raised Pawment Mar1<er, Type t 6 HUND $215,00 $1.376.00 $175.00 $1.120,00 $200,00 $1.280,00 $235,00 $1.504,00 $177,00 $1.132,80 $175,00 $1.120,00 $280,00 $1.792,00
35 Ra$ed Pawmen\ Mar1<o<, TyD<' 2 1 HUND $320,00 $384.00 $250,00 $300,00 $300.00 $360.00 $350,00 $420,00 $260,00 $312,00 $300,00 $360.00 $800,00 $960.00
36 H)'!rant Mar1<er, Type 2B 2EA $6,00 $12,00 $2,50 $5,00 $20,00 $40,00 $6.00 $12,00 $4,00 $8,00 $5.00 $10.00 $7,00 $14.00
37 Painted Line 1.485 LF $0,22 $326.70 $0,35 $519,75 $0.40 $594,00 $0,25 $371.25 $0,36 $534,60 $0.40 $594,00 $0,15 $222,75
36 Plastic Line 3.650 LF $1.64 $5,986,00 $2.00 $7.300,00 $2,00 $7.300.00 $1.85 $6.752,50 $2,25 $8,212,50 $2,50 $9.125,00 $1.40 $5.110,00
39 Plastic CrossWalk Line 360 LF $4,10 $1.476.00 $2,50 $900,00 $3.00 $1.080,00 $4,50 $1.620,00 $2,85 $1,026,00 $3,00 $1.080,00 $1,90 $684,00
40 Remow StripIng 920 LF $0,55 $506,00 $0,50 $480,00 $0.40 $368.00 $0,60 $552.00 $1,00 $920,00 $0,60 $552.00 $0,80 $736.00
41 ?\astic Pawment Mar1<ing 15 EA $48.00 $720,00 $25,00 $375,00 $40,00 $600,00 $55,00 $825.00 $25,00 $390,00 $30.00 $450.00 $38.00 $57000
42 Retocate E>ósting Sign 18 EA $215.00 $3,870.00 $250.00 $4,500.00 $130,00 $2,340.00 $200,00 $3,600.00 $200.00 $3,600.00 $190.00 $3,420,00 $104,00 $1.872,00
43 Proposed Signage 213 SF $59,00 $12,567.00 $52.00 $11,076.00 $40.00 $8,520.00 $50,dO $10.650,00 $15,00 $3,195,00 $50,00 $10.650,00 $25,00 $5.325,00
44 Illumination System Complete lEA $72.045,00 $72,045,00 $55,000,00 $55.000,00 $85.000.00 $85.000,00 $70,000,00 $70,000,00 $55.000.00 $55.000,00 $79.000,00 $79.000,00 $75.000,00 $75.000,00
45 Temporary Traffc Control Devices 1 LS $22,020.00 $22.020,00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000,00 $5,000,00 $13.000,dO $13.000.00 $15,000,00 $15,000,00 $33.500,00 $33.500,00 $12,000,00 $12,000,00
46 Silt Fence 488 LF $7.00 $3.416,00 $9.00 $4,392.00 $8,00 $3,904.00 $5,00 $2,440.00 $4,00 $1.952,00 $7,00 $3,416.00 $4,00 $1,952,00
47 Temporary Water PoliutionlErosion Conlrol 1 FA $3,000,00 $3000.00 $3,000,00' $3 000.00 $3,000,00 $3 000.00 $3,000.00 $3000.00 $3,000.00 $3000.00 $3.000,00 $3000.00 $3,000,00 $3.000,00
,
TOTAL $776,704.90 $779,970,75 $789,676.00 $817,367.75 $820,578.90 $838,028.50 $714,913.75
Copies Submnted ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE
Bid Signa'ure YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
Bid Bond YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
References N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Entered For Bid Item 10 $22,63000
Actual Amount $22,660,00
No Change In Bid Amount
Bid amount = 822291.4
Difference = $1.71250
Item # 31 Unit Pnce = $3.425
Total bid is $1.712,50
Did ~ot multiply by 0,5
P ge2012
~
CITY OF .", ~
Federal Way
MEMO RAND UM
DATE:
March 9, 2004
TO:
Jack Dovey, Chair
Land Use/Transportation Committee
FROM:
Jim Harris, Senior Planner
David ~ager
Orchid Lane Final Plat Application
Federal Way File #O3-103107-00-SU
VIA:
SUBJECT:
I.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Land Use/Transportation Committee forward to the City Council a
recommendation approving the Orchid Lane Final Plat Resolution.
II. Summary of Application
This application requests final plat approval for Orchid Lane, a subdivision of 50 single-family lots
on approximately 15.9 acres. The Federal Way City Council granted preliminary platapproyal foe the
50 lot residential subdivision on December 3, 2002. The Orchid Lane subdivision is generally located
at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of 12th Avenue SW and SW 344th Street. Zoning for the
site at the time of application was, and continues to be, Residential Single-Family (RS 7.2). Pursuant
to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 20-136, the City Council may approve the final plat
application only if all criteria of FWCC Section 20-136(b) are met. Findings and conclusions
contained in the staff report to the City Council and referenced in the resolution indicate that the plat
has been constructed in accordance with the approved preliminary plat, the final plat, and the
applicable FWCC requirements.
III. REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION
The final decision for final plats rest with the City Council in accordance with FWCC Section 20-
136(b). Bringing this matter before the City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee for review
and recommendation prior to the full Council is consistent with how land use matters are currently
processed by the City.
IV. PROPOSED MOTION
I move that the Land Use/Transportation Committee forward to the City Council, and place on the
April 6, 2004, City Council consent agenda, a recommendation approving the Orchid Lane Final Plat
Resolution.
APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT:
Jack Dovey, Chair
Michael Park, Member
Eric Faison, Member
~ Federal Way
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
STAFF REPORT
REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ApPROVAL
I.
ORCHID LANE FINAL PLAT
File No. 03-103107 -OO-SU
RECOMMENDATION
City of Federal Way staff has reviewed the final plat of Orchid Lane for compliance with preliminary plat
conditions and all applicable codes and policies, and recommends approval of the final plat application.
II.
INTRODUCTION
Date:
Request:
March 9, 2004
Request for final plat approval for Orchid Lane Subdivision
Description: Orchid Lane is a proposed subdivision of 50 single-family lots on approximately 15.9
acres. The 50 lot Orchid Lane Preliminary Plat was granted approval by the Federal Way
City Council on December 3,2002, per City Council Resolution 02-379.
Owner:
Surveyor:
Location:
Sewage
Disposal:
Access to Orchid Lane is from Ith Avenue SW or from SW 344th Street, west of 12th
Avenue S W. All required roads, sidewalks, storm drainage facilities, 'Sewer lines, water
lines, and related improvements have been constructed or are financially guaranteed.
Harbour Homes
1010 South 336th Street
Federal Way, W A 98003
Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., 425-251-6222
18215 nod Avenue South
Kent, W A 98032
At the northwest quadrant of the intersection of 10th Avenue SW and SW 344th Street. In the
NW ~ of Section 19, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M, King County (Exhibit A -
Vicinity Map).
Lakehaven Utility District
Water
Supply:
Lakehaven Utility District
Fire District: King County District No. 39
School
District:
Federal Way Public Schools, No. 210
Report
Prepared By: Jim Harris, Senior Planner
III. HISTORY AND BACKGROUND
Orchid Lane is a proposed subdivision including 50 single-family lots on approximately 15.9 acres, with
appro~imately 2.4 acres of usab1e.open space and 2.2 -acr.es.()f wetland.and. wetland buffer (Exhihi/lJ-
Final Plat Map). A proposed resolution ofthe City of Federal Way, Washington, to approve the final plat
.. ofOrcllidLane is enclosed (Exhibit C - Orchid .LaneFinaIPlatResolution),The 50-l.otÜr~hid Lane
Preliminary Plat was granted approval by the Federal Way City Council on December 3,2002, per City
Council Resolution 02-379 (Exhibit D - Preliminary Plat Map and Exhibit E - Resolution 02-379).
Zoning for the 15.9 acre site is Single-Family Residential (RS) 7.2. The Orchid Lane plat is a cluster
subdivision under the codes in place at the time of complete preliminary plat application, and the minimum
permitted lot size is 3,600 square feet. Lot sizes on the Orchid Lane Final Plat range from 4,532 to 8,942
square feet, with an average lot size of approximately 5,593 square feet.
, TheappHcant filed forfinal'plat'approval on July 29,2003: ImprovementsinstaBed underfiienumber{)2-
105745-00-EN are now substantially complete. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.110 and Section 20-136 of the
, Federol.Woy City Code (FWCC), the City Council is.charged with detennining whether:.l}thepr.oposed
final plat conforms to all terms of the preliminary plat approval; 2) if the subdivision meets the
requirements of all applicable state laws and local ordinances that were in effect at the time of preliminary
plat approval; 3) if all taxes and assessments owing on the property have been paid; and 4) if all required
improvements have been made or sufficient security has been accepted by the City.
City of Federal Way staff has reviewed the Orchid Lane Final Plat for compliance with preliminary plat
conditions and all applicable codes and policies. All applicable codes, policies, and plat conditions have
been met, or are financially secured as allowed by FWCC Section 20-135. A proposed resolution of the
City of Federal Way, to approve the final plat of Orchid Lane is enclosed (Exhibit C).
IV. COMPLIANCE WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONS
The following lists conditions of preliminary plat approval in the same order referenced in Federal Way
City Council Resolution 02-379. Required improvements have been substantially completed or are
financially secured as allowed by FWCC Section 20-135.
1. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with drainage provisions set forth in the
FWCC. Levell stormwater runoff control (detention) for the majority of the site shall be
provided by the Panther Lake Regional Stormwater Facility. The developer is required to
Orchid Lane Final Plat
Staff Report
File #03-103107-00-50 I Doc ID 26043
Page 2
analyze the downstream drainage system to the Panther Lake Regional Stormwater Facility to
verify adequate capacity; to design and construct new conveyance facilities; and to reconstruct
any portions of the conveyance system necessary to accommodate the increase in runoff. In
addition, the applicant will be required to pay a pro-rata share for off-site detention capacity to
be determined by the City. The final plat shall not be recorded and construction ofthe offsite
drainage conveyance system shall not begin until the necessary offsite easements have been
recorded.
The developer shall provide a treatment and detention facility for runoff from the remaining
portion of the west basin that cannot be conveyed to the east basin due to topographic
constraints. Final review of the stormwater quality and detention will occur in conjunction
with the full drainage review.
Staff Comment: This condition has been met. A stormwater quality pond was constructed
per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and City of Federal
Way Addendum requirements. This development will utilize the Panther Lake Regional
stormwater facility to meet detention requirements per the 1998 KCSWDM. This included
construction of an adequate downstream convøyance system down to the existing system on
SW Campus Drive and reconstruction of any existing portions of this conveyance system as
needed to accommodate the increase in runoff downstream to Panther Lake. The applicant
has paid the required pro-rata share of $27,578.88 (@ $1,728/acre) to the City for offsite
detention capacity.
2. The final plat drawing shall establish Tract A as an open space tract to be owned in common
and maintained by the homeowners association of the proposed subdivision. The final plat
note shall include provisions prohibiting removal or disturbance of vegetation and
landscaping within the regulated wetlands and buffers in Tract A, except as necessary for
maintenance or replacement of existing plantings and as approved by the City. A note shall
be included on the final plat map that the open space tracts shall not be developed with any
buildings, and may not be used for financial gain.
Staff Comment: This condition has been met. Note number 5 on the final plat and the note
regarding, ".. . restrictions for environmentally sensitive area tracts and sensitive area buffers"
implement this condition of preliminary plat approval.
3. Prior to issuance of construction permits, a final landscape plan prepared by a licensed
landscape architect shall be submitted to the City for approval, and shall include the
following elements:
A. Open space landscaping in Tract B;
B. Street trees in right-of-way landscape planter strips;
C. Significant tree preservation and replacement plan; and
D. Visual screening of the storm drainage Tract C from adjacent right-of-way with
landscaping and/or fencing. Cyclone fencing, if used, shall be coated black or green,
and vegetation comparable to a FWCC Type III buffer shall be provided between the
Tract C fence and 12th Avenue right-of-way.
Orchid Lane Final Plat
Staff Report
File #03-1031 07-00-SU / Doc ID 26043
Page 3
Staff Comment: This condition has been met. A landscape plan was reviewed and approved
and has been implemented in accordance with the approved plan.
4. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS),
as amended by the City of Federal Way for this project, including the street improvements
identified in staff report Finding of Facts Number 18.
Staff Comment: This condition has been met. The street improvement plan was reviewed and
approved by the City prior to construction of the plat infrastructure. The street improvements
have been installed and accepted by the City, with the exception of minor punchlist items.
5. Mass clearing and grading of the plat is pennitted for infrastructure construction and lot
clearing. However, all of Tract A and approximately % of Tract B will remain undisturbed.
Staff Comment: This condition has been met as required by the preliminary plat condition.
6. Non-motorized access Tract F shall be owned and maintained by the homeowners association,
as.itisan extensionoff.aprivate access tract. TIactsl.and J wjll be owned bythe_puhlic.
Maintenance and ownership provisions ofthese tracts must be identified on the final plat.
Staff Comment: This condition has been met. The plat notes identify that Tract F is owned
and maintained by the homeowners association. As requested by City staff during the
engineering plan review, Tracts I and J shown on the approved preliminary plat map were
consolidated into one pedestrian tract on the final plat, which is Tract I. Note number 12 on
thefinalpiat map identifiesthnt-Tract I is to be dedicnted to the public.
7. ,Priør tefmal.platappmval,the.applicant shaU-either.OOflstruot- foorspeed. humps to City
standards, or contribute $8,000.00 to the City for implementation of traffic calming devices to
mitigate project impacts.
Staff Comment: This condition has been met. The applicant has paid the City $8,000.00.
v.
COMPLIANCE WITH SEP A MITIGATION MEASURES
The following lists SEPA mitigation measures in the same order as on the July 3,2002, Mitigated
Detennination of Non significance (MONS) for the proposal. Required improvements have been
substantially completed or are financially secured as allowed by FWCC Section 20-135.
I. Clearing, grading, and streetlutilitywork for the plat and off-site improvements will not be
pennitted from October 31 to March 30, unless otherwise approved in writing by the Public
Works Director.
Staff Comment: This condition has been met. Clearing, grading, street construction, and
utility trenching were all largely completed prior to October 31, 2003. Required finish work,
including trench backfill, asphalt paving, and concrete construction, continued past the
October 31 deadline; however, these items served to further stabilize the site and did not
create new erosion concerns.
Orchid Lane Final Plat
Staff Report
File #03-1031 07-00-SU I Doc ID 26043
Page 4
2. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall provide and implement a plan for fencing and
signage along the on-site perimeter of the 100-foot wetland buffer. The fencing shall be of
split rail or comparable material. Additionally, a minimum of seven educational signs shall be
provided around the on site wetland buffers. A final plan for sign content (including wetlands
are a valuable resource and dump no waste materials), sign placement, and fence design
shall be developed by a qualified professional and provided to the City for review and
approval by the City at the applicant's expense.
Staff Comment: This condition has been met. A plan for wetland buffer fencing and
signage was approved in conjunction with the engineering plan review, and the fencing and
signage has been installed and completed per the approved plan.
3. The applicant shall reconstruct any portion ofthe City of Federal Way BPA Trail impacted
by construction of on-site or off-site improvements associated with the Orchid Lane project.
The trail reconstruction and realignment will be on both sides of lth Avenue SW. Final trail
design and construction plans must be approved by the City of Federal Way Public Works
and P ARCS Departments in conjunction with final engineering plan review. Reconstruction
ofthe trail shall be complete prior to final plat approval.
Temporary construction impacts to the BPA Trail shall be minimized to the maximum extent
feasible. Final engineering and construction plans must include a plan for maintaining trail
access and use during construction of the project and associated street improvements.
Staff Comment: This condition has been met. The BPA trail has been reconstructed per the
approved engineering plan that was reviewed by PARCS and Public Works Departments.
4. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall construct the following Transportation
Improvement Plan (TIP) projects:
a. S 348th St: 91h Ave S to SR 99 - Add HOY lanes, 2nd NB left-turn lane on SR 99,
install raised median and underground utilities
b. S 348th St @ 1 st Ave S - Add WB, SB right-turn lanes, 2nd EB, WB left-turn lanes
c. S 356th St: 151 Ave S to SR 99 - Widen to 5 lanes, bike lanes, sidewalks,
illumination
d. 21st Ave SW: Extension from SW 356th St to 22nd Ave SW - Extend 2-lane
collector and signal modifications
e. lOth Avenue SW: SW Campus Drive to SW 344th St - Extend 3-lane street
In lieu of constructing these TIP projects, prior to final plat approval, the applicant may
voluntarily pay a pro-rata share contribution of $135,500.00 toward the impacted TIP projects.
Staff Comment: This condition has been met. The applicant constructed significant frontage
improvements on a portion ofthe 10th/12th Avenue TIP project. In part, these frontage
improvements fulfill a portion of the SEP A mitigation for impacts to this TIP project, in an
amount equivalent to a pro-rata payment of $58,300.00 toward this TIP project. The applicant has
paid the City $77 ,200.00 for the remaining pro-rata share mitigation of impacted TIP projects
listed above, a-d.
Orchid Lane Final Plat
Staff Report
File #03-1031 07-00-SU I Doc tD 26043
Page 5
VI. DECISIONAL CRITERIA
Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-136, if the City Council finds that the following criteria have been met, the
City Council may approve the final plat for recording.
1. The final plat is in substantial conformance to the preliminary plat.
Staff Response: This criterion has been met, as the conditions of preliminary plat have been
met or are financially guaranteed, and the final plat is in substantial conformance to the
preliminary plat.
2. The final plat is in conformity with applicable zoning ordinances, or other land use controls.
Staff Response: This criterion has been met and/or is financially guaranteed. The plat meets
the cluster subdivision lot size requirements in place at the time of complete preliminary plat
application. Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-155, the plat provides 15.perœntofthesite..as
usable open space. The wetland in Tract A is protected with a 100-foot undisturbed buffer.
Infr.astructure improvements are substantially complete, except thestreet1igbts,andmustbe
completed within six months of final plat approval. As provided in FWCC Section 20-135,
performance and maintenance bonds are in place for completion of any outstanding
improvements.
3. That all conditions of the Hearing Examiner and/or City Council have been satisfied.
StaffRêsponse: This criterion has been met as noted in the staff comments above. AU plat
conditions have been met and/or are financially guaranteed to be completed within six
roontnsof final plat appfOV1\L All life safety improvements have been eompleted.
4. That the public use and interest shall be served by the estab I i shment of the,subdivision.and
dedication by determining if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the
public health, safety, general welfare, open space, drainage ways, streets and roads, alleys,
other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts,
including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for
students who only walk to and from school.
Staff Response: This criterion has been met. The final plat is consistent with applicable
zoning and subdivision regulations and ensures the public health, safety, and welfare is
protected. The plat infrastructure has been installed and/or adequately financially guaranteed
as discussed above, including: safe walking routes to school; on-site usable open space;
drainage system installation; water system installation; sewer system installation; and street
improvements.
5. That all required improvements have been made, and maintenance bonds or other security for
such improvements have been submitted and accepted.
Staff Response: This criterion has been met. All road and storm drainage improvements for
Orchid Lane have been constructed and/or are financially guaranteed. The street improvements
are complete, with the exception of the street lighting. The financial guarantees on file with the
Orchid Lane Final Plat
Staff Report
File #03-1031 07-00-SU I Doc ID 26043
Page 6
City will assure completion of the streetlights within six months of final plat approval. In
addition, all water lines and sewer lines have been installed and deemed substantially complete
as identified in the February 18, 2004, letter of substantial completion from the Lakehaven
Utility District.
6. That all taxes and assessments owing on the property being subdivided have been paid.
Staff Response: Prior to being recorded, the plat is reviewed by the King County
Department of Assessments to ensure that all taxes and assessments have been paid.
VII. CONCLUSION
Based on site visits, review of the final plat maps, construction drawings, and the projectiile, staff has
determined that the application for final plat approval for Orchid Lane meets all platting requirements of
RCW 58.17.110 and FWCC Section 20-136. Plat infrastructure improvements have been substantially
completed and/or financial guarantees have been provided10 assure completion of plat conditions within
six months of final plat approval, as allowed by FWCC SeotiOft.20-135. The project has been developed in
conformance with Resolution 02-379. A recommendation of final plat approval is therefore being
forwarded to the City Council for your approval.
VIII. EXHIBITS
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Vicinity Map for Orchid Lane
8'li x 11 Reduced Copy of Orchid Lane Final Plat Map
Final Plat Resolution of the City of Federal Way, Washington, Approving the Orçhid Lane
Final Plat
8'li x 11 Reduced Copy of Approved Orchid Lane Preliminary Plat
Resolution 02-379 - December 3, 2002, City of Federal Way Preliminary Plat Approval of
Orchid Lane
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Orchid Lane Final Plat
Staff Report
File #03-103107 -OO-SU / Doc ID 26043
Page 7
i City of
Federal Way
Orchid Lane
: Preliminary Plat
¡ Applications
M1i> (\jolt: ~loI:.:' 11l, ~aQ~
~ltU~:t"
t$.",j "¡'~', YlH&.'E3'
~'58:_4
r.""'~I<::m~::o,~.... ,
g¡7~ff~~1:::}~' "??.
...:<~:¡..I,<ik 000""'-"1,
Location
F~~-"'-- "
¡;. '""",..:::::: I "
I ¡,~;. .i,:~i'" ~> ':;,...".. d ," ~ 1 ~~~~~~~~"~::':~'~~~"l ¡
~ . .', i, Orchid .0. ,..",'. ¡ ¡
, . ~ ~;,,"'.., . ,-- . " ," "", !
I ¡: «,x' L 'r." c' j .. . ' ¡ !
. "',: '\t cc'- '- .,' '!
' <¡In" ane ~",,",-(,"", " >'ttl"rtH :";,~!
¡ '. ¡ :" -q Ii,. o!'~ , "'.v ".!!
. <þ.c'" ' )' ,....' c ",' ,
, : .0- .. ."-':-i"'; ...;'1/ ¡
, ,c' <" ,', ,"" c ! !
¡: (.,.. """""".;. . . .~-,_cc '~;.'¡~'~."~ ""..: ¡~
I l',",'" ","""""""" '-:"~"~'1 ,,"
I !' i :~~~~..,..',',',.'..,""'" i~~~~f~{~F~~~~::~"c""-,,' ~:"'<~~\:" > I
I "",""""""'" ,'.'" .. '. ,{ . ì ¡
¡..:. JC....,.. ,.., ~:- :,: ~:. ,.ccc" if';> ~~~:: ;' . ~ ¡
¡. ,{ -"'c cc.l ~~":.",.';~:"'f' '.:ð':f' ~In:¡t".mm ¡
¡ : .,~' ,-Ç-......",:o'." '","", ,¡~~Et¡~:.!I$650¡:Hj i
! '¡~~~:;~ci;k:~¥~?é¡;ii%;L;JL%¿l,' (~'J;~~;: J. ,'~:X}~? _':-c~:'~i :Wf~~ !
¡
....,..,
,....
.
Central portion
of City
~m
ø><
m:J:
~
0
-n
SECTION
STREET ADDR£SSES
(AS - "'11<£ 0001"""""-",')
LvI II 3<J17 - a11< I'UC( 5.
WT 2 3<JIJ - al1< P\JΠ50
WT J)oI3O9 - 1J1\! P\JΠ50
LOr . 3<305 - 13TH PlJΠSW
(,,1911<41"( . UV SW 34JR!> 51)
WI /5 3<2J1 - 13TH FLJœ SW
(IJJrR",n: . a26 SW J<J!IO SI)
LOr 6 3<221 - 13TH PlJCE 50
LOT 7 3422' - 13TH Pw:£ SW
LOI . 342" - "'H PlJCE 50
WT 3<217 - 1J1\! PlXE '"
lOT 10 342a - IJI1< PlICE 50
LOI ".1<209 - 1J1\! P1.IΠ50
LOI 12 .1<207 - 13TH P1.'ΠSW
LOT" .\42OS - 13TH P\.OΠSW
WI "3<201 - 1J11< PIJΠ50
LOT IS 34117 - 1.111< PlICE 50
LOT '6 3411' - IYH PlJΠ50
LOI 17 .1<109 - 1.mt PlJΠ50
LOI " 341OS - l.mt PIJΠ50
LOT ,. 3<101 - IjIH PlJΠ50
LOT20.\4102-IJ1IIPlICE5O
LOT ".\4106 - "n< PlJΠ50
LOT 22"" - SW .\400 P\.OŒ
("""",n: . 34216 - 1.!1H PlJŒ S»
LOT 123 1.110 - 50 3421<0 PVŒ
LOT 2' 1306 - 50 342NO IVCE
LCT 25 1302 - 50 3<2NO Pl.OŒ
LOT 26 1m - 50 342"0 Pl.OŒ
illl 27 12{)8 - 50 3<2NO PVŒ
LOT 28 1104 - 50 3<2N0 IVCE
LOT 29 3<220 - 1.!1H CWRT 50
("mt"'1E . 12117 SW 3400 IVCE)
LOT 3<222 - IJ1\! COORr SW
LOT I .1'226 - "'" coo'" 50
LOT 32 J4J02 - l.mt COI.m SW
LOT JJ.!4J04 - l.mt COIm SW
LOI J<JO8 - "'" COURT SW
LOI J5 34.\15 - "'" C\)URf SW
LOT J6 34.\11 - l.mt COURT 50
lOT J7 J4JO7 - IJIH COURT 50
lDT J8 J4JOJ - "'" COORT 50
lOT J9 J4J01 - "'" CO\IRT 50
lDI 40 "219 - l.mt C\)URf SW
lOT " 34225 - IJIH C\)URf SW
lOT '2 "221 - 1.mt COt!RI 50
(0lIEftNA1! . 1301 SW "21<0 IVCE)
lOT '143 3422' - 13TH PlJΠ50
("TERHA1"( . 1315 SW 342110 IVCE)
lDT ~ "228 - l.mt IVCE SW
lOT '5 J<2J2 - ,"" Pl.OC£ SW
LOT <6 J4JOO - "'" Pl.OC£ SW
LOT "J4J06 - l.mt Pl.OC£ 50
LOT .. 34.\10 - 1.mt IVCE SW
lDT '9 34'" - l.mt IVCE SW
LOT 34.\18 - 1J11< Pl.OC£ 50
ORCHID
LANE
[
,0",-,/""
J
BEING A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF
19, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. WILLAMETTE
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
MERIDIAN
rHO'""""" tti!:'êR S¡C¡1C. "
, fO'" """" -.0"""" ~
r,- w/ PK"" '" CK,t :'/00) ("'.00'", ,,";51""1) /"'"",C~""L' r,"""'"
-- ,&r,...J115J5,,';ntr:, I SiC.O' ,9
" -------------------'\,-~' (C.\lCCL<1i:DPCS,'I<)N)
ß'
,; ¡
~ I
fOU," RE!l" w/ ':A' .,.",',
C,IO'l\DR11<kO,C9'WlSl
REITRENCE - RECCIO cr ~.lRVEY
BY "",... f, GARIN<), FIS
REC, NO, 9JO1O81'JO9
I
I
I
,
/
,il-
~~
I!"':!
~~
II~~
ES-
e;¡
~
~
...;
:;
I
I
,
I
ê
. ~
~"",:m:
/VÆST 0UAA1!R CORNER S(CTIOII "
FOUND COHCR£1[ IIOI<UIÆNT
, w/ WI! k TI£ ( (2/00)
N8B'S1""" 68',60'
'- ;r; --58'22... 1281~'~(~ If;T46
I ~ ~ e' ". ES:';C¡ £, M PCS.~' r-....' 2 4"]T '
r;;- ~~ I ~ I ~ I .1 8 I; s I s tf.~, ' '(~58'22"W 2594.74' KCAS)
L - ~lI-mT1Ht.: ' ^ /
I " æ~/. y
L- $ '/
I I I I I / /
L_\/ /
)/
100'",,-
tJ£ DSIIÐIT
REt.1IlJ194512
I
/~
I I
, - N8~S1""w 11",4" -'
\COOEII S(CTIOH 19
(C-'<CUlJ.TED POSITlOH)
~
0
"'-'IE
0
0
.
...
/
.-
...
...
.-
EXHIQIT ~
PAGE-L-OF -JtL-
.
]
-;
~
LEGEND
-1- - rO\J! ) SEC11OII CORI£R CO 0UAA1!R CO1MR
000 SE""'" QIJNUU! CORNER (CoIlCIJIlTED POSITION)
6> FOOJNO ~1JI<1JIIOO AS NOTED
@ PW' CXJtIHER S£I
('CAS) ~ j£NSIOH OTED ON lONG COUN1Y 1Ð'>'l SUIMY
(e:E) 0ItÆIISI0N OTED OIl IIOU!ÐN<Y SUIMY OOHIIUCTED BY
8oIRCH/iJSÐI COIIS1JlTI'C DIGINEERS DA1!D 5/21/03
(ESU) ~I/ÐISIOH CIIID ON CCIIfI\Q. WORI<SHŒI
- I1f ESN. IHC. DATED '/29/9'
c
0
ë
¡
~
¿
RESUBMITTED
, JAN 2 6 2004
o~- CO3COì-i'SV<..
0 100 200 400
f"'l.,]"" ;'1 "......""",...J
SCAlE; " - 200'
CITY FlLE NO, 03-103107-00-5U
LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE:
he..by certify that this plat 01 ORCHID lANE ;s based upan an
actuol """01' and subdivision 01 Section 19. Township 21 Ha<th,
Range' East, W,U.. that the cau...s and dl,tance. are ,hawn
ca,",clly roan; that the monuments will be ,et and the lot
and bloc c m ";11 be ,taked correctly an the ground os
can,t,uc pleted and that 1 have fully complied with
the poa platting 'e<Julations,
RECORDING CERTIFICATE:
Recooding No,
"led lor oocood at the '<que,t 01 the City 01 Fed.,al Way thi,
- day of ,200-, at - minut..
po,t - -' m, and oecooded .. Volume - of Pia" a'
paq" - th'ouc¡h -, oec..-d, of ""9 County, Woshinqlon,
OM510H OF RECORDS ANO EI£CT10HS
Barghausen ,.
Consulting Engineers. Inc.
~8~1~~~So:nnl'1en~'9~entol-
Te!<phone; ('25) 251-6222 Fa" (425) 25HI782
is :
~ :
ì!
~ ,
2.(¡ -n..J 0+ (".
Date "
SW1/4 OF NW1/4, SEC. 19. T21N-R4E, W.M.
SHEET 1 OF 6
"'anag...
, Superintendent 01 RocOods
ORCHID
.0'_'"'/"'"
J
LANE
BEING A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF
19, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
SECTION
LEGAL DESCRIPnON
PARCa 1-
'H "'5T '00 'EÐ or ThE NORm"^,-" 0, WE SOU!!< TIIO-m,HS 0, GO,ERI,M"" LOT 2. SECCON 19. TO",,'5,1P
21 No<m. "ANGE , EAST. WM.. " <!NG COWTY. WI<$N"GTON. J1.<E NCRTH "'0 sour., l:NES OF SAJG :RAe, TO
a, PAMLlE' WITH TNE "ORTH ""0 SO"," LINE Oc SAJO GCVE""EN[ lOT 2.
"T""TE 'N THE COc'NTY OF K"G. sme OF WASHINGTON.
FAAcrL 2:
iHE <>S' 500 FEIT Of THE SOUTH O"E-Rm< OF COVE"NMENT LOT 2. Sl:CTlON 19, ;oWNS"'P 2T I10R,", RA"DE
4 EAST, W.". 'N K!~ COUNTY, W,\SH",GTON
SITCATE IN "'E COuNTY OF KIt'e. STATE OF WASHINGTON.
PARŒL J,
THJ.T PORTION cr GOVERNMENT LOT 2. SECTION 19. TOWNSHiP 21 NOR"', RANGE 4 EAST, WM" IN K!l<G COUNTY,
WA$H!NGlON. CESCP'Bm AS FOLLOWS'
BEGINNING AT mE NOR",WEST CORNER OF SAJD GO",R""£,, lOT 2,
,"ENeE 50U," "-ONG 'HE WEST UNE 412 FE¡:T;
TH,"CE EAST 272 FEfT TO 'HE WuE POINT Of eEGINN,NG 0' 1>IE TRACT HERE'N OESCRIB,'"
'H£NCE EAST 1003 FEET;
THENCE SOVTH '79 fŒ'T;
'"E"CE WEST IOCR "':ET,
TeENCE NORTH 319 rm TO THE PO,NT OF 9£GiNNINC.
SOUATE IN THE COUNTY OF <'NC. smE OF WASHINGTON
DEDICATION
KNOW AU. PEOPLE ey THESE PRESE"S '"AT WE, THE ,'r,DERSICNED OW'ERS or "'TEREST iN THE L~'O HER£BY
SUSD,,".vED. HrRfSY DECI.A.'!E THIS PLAT 10 BE """ C"'PHIC R£PRESENWICN OF "'E SUB()1\TS10N NAI>f HERf-
BY. AND CO HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE USE CF TeE PUBUC FCRE\fROll S'""ETS AND .,nIUES NOT SHQWN AS
PP"ATE HER,ON AND OECIC.,E THf USE 1>IEREOF FOR AU PUBUC PU,"OSES NO' INCONS"T!"'T WiTH ThE USE
THEREOF FOR puoue HiGHWAY PURFOSES, AND 'LSD THE O:GHT '0 MAKE 'u 'ECES","Y SLOPES FOR CUTS AND
~Ll5 uPO' THE LOTS LNO TRACTS SHOWN 'HEREON '" !HE ORiGiNAl "-.À$ONA9LE GRAC'NG O~ $o'JD mEETS AND
A'",NOES. "'0 PulPiER DmlCATE TO 'hE USE or THE pusue All "'E E"'EMENTS AND TRACTS SHOWN ON "'S
PLA'.fOR "-'P,t)8UC. PC.POSES AS ""CJCl¡lED T¡;¡:¡¡£D~, ""WD,N(; ßlJT~OT LIMITED TO P"RKS, oP£NSPo1I;;E,
UTiUTIES AND ORM'ACE UNLESS SUCH E"'EME"TS OR T¡¡'CTS ARE SPEC:~CAlcY 10ENT,FlED ON THIS PLAT AS
eEING DmeAl,O OR Co:;VEYEO TO A .[R$CN OR ENTITY OTHER THAN "'E ?UBUe, :N WHICH CASE WE CO HEReBY
OEDI""TE AND CO'N£'( SUCH STREETS, EASE","IS. OR m<CTS TO 1>IE PERSCN CR E'TTlTY ID~'TIRED AND FOR
;HE PU¡¡POSE STATED,
<UR""". >Io1(.Y";¡ERSIGNED OWNERS Of Pi, ,LAN.' HERE:IIY ..sLJ¡ ¡)MOCC,."'TÆ AND PELEASE FCR TJj£1<.)U.\ŒS,
THEIR HŒS ,"0 ASSICNS AND ANY PERSON OR ENTITY DER"'NG TlTU: FRO" 1><E UNDERS:(;NEO, Þm AND All
CLAIMS FOR aloMAGES <G"'NST ThE CITY OF FEDERAl "^<. ITS SUCCESSORS AND ISSIGNS WrllCH M^< aE OCCA-
SiONED ¡;y 1>IE aES'GN EST,,"USHMENT, CONS"'UCtON, OP£RAnDN. ""LURE TO OPERATE. OR ""'NTE'io\NÇE OF
ROADS .\NO/OR _NAGE S>S'E"S. ALTERAtONS OF 1>1£ GROUND SURFo1I;;E, 'ÆGITATION, OIWNAGE OR SURrACE
OR S1JBSURFÞ.CE WA;£R FtO'" "',"IN !>iE SuBOOV'oS10NS OR "'TH'N "" CR"'NAGE OR DETErmON Fo1I;;lUTIES OE-
SICNE<I 'W f'.6cEM: .oR ..cwALLY RECEiI1'<G ~. "-1<OM*S\J8J MS QNs "0 1>IE CITY OF FF.DERo\L:wA'I'£
~£W AND APPROV",- OF PlANS AND PERMITS FOR SAM" OTHER THAN CLAJM$ RESULTING FROM iNADEOUATE
v><NTÐ""CE BY 'HE CITY or FEDER"'- WAY.
f1)RrrlER, THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS OF THE lAND HEREBY SUBOMDED, AGREE FOR THE"SEl'ÆS, THEJR HEIRS
AND ASSIGNS TO INOEM'<lFY, HOLD HAR"LESS. AND DEÆND 1>1£ CITY OF FEDE."^'- WAY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND
ASSIGNS, fROOflOM}'4oGAiNST Þm D""AGE, INCLU(!ING, _CO51'S Of O€FENSE, CtA/"ED BY PERSONS """iN< <)I<
WITHOUT THE SUBO"'510"S TO HAVE 9EE' C.A1!SED BY 1>IE DESIGN. ESTABLISHMENT, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION,
F"'LURE TO OPE""TE. OR WJNTE""K:E OF ROADS AND/OR DRAINAGE Sf5TEN. AlTERATIONS Of THE GROUND SUR-
FACE, VEC£TATION, DRAJNACE, OR SVRFACE OR SUBSURFACE WATER FlOWS WITHIN THE SUBDiYlS1ONS OR WITHIN
ANY OR"'"AGE OR OETENnoN FAC~ITIES DES!G"D TO RECEIVE OR ACnJAU.Y RECEIVoNC OfWNAGE "'OM THE SuB-
OMSIONS AND 1>IE CITY Of FEDERAl W<YS REVIEW AND APPROVAlOf' PlANS AND PER"ITS FOR ""'E, PRO'I1DED,
TrllS WANER AND INO£"NIRCATiON SH'il NOT BE CONSTRUED AS RE\.£ASING THE CITY Of FEO£RAl WAY, ITS SVC-
CESSORSOR ASS!C"S, FROM UÞB'UTY FOR DMlAGES, INCLUDING THE COST OF OEFENSE, RESULTING FROM """
TO TIiE EXTrNT or THE SOLE NEGUCErICE OF THE elTY or ÆOERAl WAY, ITS SUCCESSORS, OR ASSICNS.
THIS SUBOMSION, DED:C>TIO". RElEASE, INDEMNI~CATION Of CtAI"S, AND ACREEMENT TO fIOLD HARMLESS IS NAOE
1>11>1 THE FREE CONSENT AND IN !\CCORDANCE Wi1>l 1>IE DESIRES OF SAID OWNERS.
IN Wl'NESS WHEREOF WE SET OUR HANDS AND SEAlS:
HARaOUR HOMES II<C.
A WASHlHCTON CORPORATION
BY,
OS:
BANK OF AMEJ'ICA, NA
BY,
ITS,
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUmY OF KING
I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISF!\CTORY EVIDENCE THAT
IS THE PERSON WHO N'P£,II<EO aEFORE ME. ~ND $A.1) P[~ !\CKNOWLEDCED THA'
(S)HE SiGNED THIS INmU",NT, ON () ,Th STATED (S)HE WAS AliTHOft1'ED TO ExEeUIT
THE ,"STRIMN! ÞH!) ACK!<OWlEDCEO IT ÞS THE or - HOOES INC.
TO aE ¡HE FREE AND VOlUNTARY !\CT OF SUCH .""TY FOR 11« USES AND PURPOSES
MENT1ONED IN THE INSTRU"ENT.
DATED 1>I1S_DAY Of_, 2004.
¡ SS.
NOTARY PUBUe !N AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINCTON
R£SiDlNG AT
PRINTED NAME
C""MISSION EXPIRES
~~~ri'FO:~~GTON ¡ SS.
I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISF!\CTORY EV1fJENCE THAT
IS THE PERSON WHO APPEARED BEFORE "E, AND SAID PERSON ACKNOWLEDGED THAT
(S)HE SlCNED 1>I1S INSTRUMENT, ON () ,Th STATED (S)HE w'" oIIJTHORIZED TO EXECUIT
THE INSTRUMENT NID ICKNO\\\.EOCEIJ IT /oS THE OF IW<K OF ....ERICA
TO BE THE FREE AND VOlUNTARY ACT OF SUCH p""TY FOR T\i£ USES AND PURPOSES
MENTIONED .. THE INSTRUIAENT.
DATED THIS_DAY Of_, 2004.
EXHI
PAGE
NOTARY PUÐUC IN AND FOR THE STArr Of WASHINGTON
RESIDING AT
PRINTED ""'E
COII"'SSION EXPlR£S
MERIDIAN
APPROVALS
DEPAR!ME'" OF PUBliC WORKS
E"M""O AND ,,"°PO',tO TH!S - --- --.. nAY OF____- n, ~OO4.
P""UCI;';?KS OI"~CTOP ----
--- . -----
OEPAH,MENT OF COMMIJNrT( DEVELOPMENT
EXAM,NED MoJO 'PPRú,m THIS__OAY OF__- --, 20C4
~FCo"'¡ûîi,TY DE\"E'OP"EÑ,------_n__-_-
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCiL
EXMlINED ."0 APPROVED THIS-_u_DAY CF__-o 2004.
MAYOR
n__--___-'-
AmST,
CiT'i'ClERK----------------- -- ----
KiNG COuNTY OEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS
EXAMINEO AND "'FROVED THIS__O'Y OF___.__. 2004.
KIÑGCOUNlY ASSCSS9R
ACCO')Nl "U"SER_.
DEPUTY KI"'õ~ššESSo;¡
FINANCE DIVISION CERTIFlCATE
I HEI!<T!Y CERTIFY THAT All PROPERTY TAXES AAE>~'I), ""'AT THÆ "ENO DIl1NC1JOO',m:IAL'~
CERnflED 10 1"'S ornCE rOR COl:.ECnoN "NO THAT "-L SPECIAl ASsESSMENTS CER""EO TO THIS ornCE FOR
ColLEenD" ON "" OF T,'E PROPERTY HEREiN CON",""". DWCATED AS S,,"fErS, AlLLTS OR FOR "W OTHER
PUBUC USE. ARE PAiD IN F!ILL
THIS ----- eAY OF ------, 200<.
FINANCE DIV'oSION
.iJAÑ.4CER. fiNANCE D"'SiCN
EASEMENTS AND RESERVATIONS
~N EASEMEN' IS HEREBY RESERVED FOR AND GRANTED TO PuCET SOUND ENERGY, QW£ST CO""UNICATIONS, CQM-
CAST, lAKEHA'lrN UT1UTY DISTRICT AND THEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS AND ASSIONS, UNOm AND UPON THE EN-
TIRE TRACTS 1)", "EO "NO T". AS WElL AS 1>IE ="'OR 10 ÆET, PARAillL WIT>< AND AOJ()ININC THE STREET
J~TAGE OF AlL LOTS AND TRA.."TS (Ð<CEPT TlOCT') 1...- ;14< .œrRlOR 1J) F'E.E1 .lJfl.OIS '2 IHIICIICH 19
ADJACENT TO AND ABUTTiNC TRACTS "1)° ""I) T, IN WHICH TO INSTAlL. CONSTRUCT, RENEW, OPERATE AND
""'NTAIN UNDERGI!DUNO CONDUITS. MAINS, CABLES AND "RES WITH "ECESSARY FAClLOtES AND O'HER EOUIPMENT
FOR 1><E PURPOSE OF SE""'NG THIS SU8DMSiON AND 01>lER PROPERTY WIT>< EL£CTR1C, TREPHONE, TV, WATER,
SEWER AND GAS SERVICI: TOGrn<ER "'Trl 'THE RIGHY TO ~NTER UPON 1>IE LOTS AT AU. _S FOR THE PURPOSE
HEREIN STATED.
THESE EASEME"lS ENTERED L~N FOR THESE PURPOSES SHAll. BE RESTORED AS NEAR AS POSSIBLE TO THEIR
ORIGINAL eONDmON BY 11« UnUTY. NO UNES OR "RES FOR THE TRANSt.I1SS1ON OF EL£CTRIC CURRENT, mLPHONE
OR CABLE TV SHAlL BE PL4CED OR BE PERMITIEO TO BE PL4CED UPON ANY LOT UNLESS THE SANE SHAll. BE
UNDERCI<OUNO oR IN CONDUIT ATT!\CHED TO A BUiLDINC.
~
DOWNSPOUT NOTE
"-L BUIlDING DOWNSPOUTS. FOOTING D""NS, AND DRAINS "'0" All IMPfR'IDVS SVRF!\CES SUCN AS PATIOS AND
DRII/EWA\'S SHAll BE CONNEGTED TO THE PERMANENT STORM DR"'" OU!L£T AS SHOWN ON 1>IE APPRO\<J) CONST-
RUC11ON DRAWiNGS, PERMIT NO. D2-10S145-ooo-oo-EN, ON Alf WITH 1>IE C\TI' Of FEDERAL WAY. 1I<IS PLAN SHAll BE
SUB"TTED WITH THE N'I'UCATlON OF "'" 8UIlDING PERMIT- AlL CONNECTIONS OF 1HE DRAINS MUS! BE CONSTRUCTED
AND APPROVED P!OOR yo THE ~NAl BUILOINC INSPECTION APPROVAl- FOR 1>I0SE LOrs THAT AR!: DESIGNATED
FOR INDMOUAl LOT INFURAT1ON SYSTEMS, THE =MS SHALl BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE TIME DF 1>IE II1JllDING
PERMIT AND SHAlL C""PlY WITH 1>IE Pc""S ON Rl£. All '"0""""'" S1UB-DUT'S AND INRLTRAT1QN sYSTEMS
SHALL BE PRNATELY OWNED AND ioIAJNT"'NED BY THE LD! OWNER,
NO LOTS AR!: AP,,"O'lrD FOR INQlVlDUAl INFILTRATION SYSTEt./S.
..
c
"
~
SURVEYOR'S NOTES:
I. THE SEC11OH 51.- FOR THIS SECOON ~ B/oSEO ON THE K~G COUNrf"RIAI. SI.4MY ('CAS) SEC11ON SUBDMSiON or SEC-
TION ¡9. TOWNSHIP 21 N.. RN<GE , ~. W.W. ,"0 < CONTOOL WOR1<SIiffi BT ES", INC. I!AS1S OF BEARJNG ~ THE WEST lIŒ or
THE -..rn """""" OF SECTION 19, PO KCAS (NOI-"""E).
,. THIS IS A F1Ð.D IRA~RSE SUINÐ'. A SOIOOA FM:-SEC<JND illCTRCNIC TOTAl STAOON W/oS uSED 10 t.1[,OSU1<[ THE o\NCBlAI! N<O
OISTN<CE AE1J,1IONS1tPS Œ1WEIN THE CQNTROWHO 1j()N\JI O/T<1ION ÞS SHOWN. ClOSURE RATIOS Of THE 1RA.u& lIE! OR rn:ŒIIEO
1HOS{ SI'EOrn IN WJI; JJ2-13O-090. DlSToIHCE MWU~HC EOUI""'ENT R/oS I!EIN CALl!RATED A' AN N.c.$. I!IoSI2JNE WTRIN ONE
TEN< Of THE !WE OF THIS -t'(.
c
<
J. PlAT COIUOS >tRE STA ([ ) WITH ,. . PIPE. 24' IN tD<GTH AU!O WITH CONCRETE. £JICEJ'T /oS NOTED ON S>£m " 5 N<O 6-
TROHT LOT CORNERS WE!>( STAKED WITH '/,° GAtVAN!2EO """ PIPE """ PlAST1C CAPS - "ÐŒ '8238°. REAA LO' -
W[R( srA ([ ) WITH J/" CAlV"'Z!D IRON PIPE MTH PlAST1C CAPS ""'KED 'BŒ Z82",O, £JICEJ'T /oS NOTED ON SNEETS " 5 ÞH!) 6-
CI1Y OF FE!JERAL WAV ST,"""'" STRŒT lIOHulIENTS WE!>( 5ET IiI ROO tN:Ð!SEC11ONS, PC'S, Pr$. OR PI'$,
4. >tR11CAI. DATU" ~ HOW '929 PO ~FORIlATiON I'RO\1DED BT THE CI1Y OF FEDERAl. W<Y. BENC1<IIARK is - SPIKE ~
THE SOUTH FAQ£ OF POWER POlE J11035 0 S2J81 lOCATED W' EAST OF COO'ERU<E IZTH A'ÆNUE 50, N'!'ROXIIIA!D.Y 18$ FEET
\IORTH OF mE COOU<UIIE $0 J4I;1\I P\.IΠaMOON. 40'.20 FEET.
JO8 NO. 10715
,Barghausen .
~Consultlng Engineers. Inc.
CM! Enq....ri0>9. Land PIamIònq. SuMyòng, En.....me""'! Smòces
1821S 12<0<1 A- South Kenl, WA. 9SO32
T.~pIoone: (425) 251-S222 F." (425) 251-8782
L
~ ,
SW1/4 OF NWV4. SEC. 19, T21N-R4E. W,M,
SHEET 2 OF 6
CITY FILE NO- OJ-1031D7-00-SU
i:~:. E G lG ~.~ D .~ ~~j f(
ORCHID
J
,0,."',"'"
LANE
BEING A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF
19, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
SECTION
PLAT NOTES AND RESTRICTiONS:
1 ,,".,'" TrlE CCURSE OF èO"5TRUCT<>N OF k" LCT 'iTH'" WIS '"9OM""", SruB-OUT it \~", m....nONS
FOR STOR" D""N>OE SHOULe BE >PH" "' T"E ,NOMC"'" LOT BCIIr," OR OWNeR TO poO'-"OE ,HE NECES-
SA" SLGFE FRO" ;HE FêOOOSCO """s¿
2 THE ARœLfS or iNCOROO","'IO" FOR THe ooCHi~ CANe "OM",W'.ERS >SEOCIAT:GN ARE ON mE W1TH
THE SWI: OF .""H.'NGTeN IN Ol",1PI"
3. "'Y ADDRESSES S"OWN APE FRW"""'" ONl' l.ND ARE SUE;ECT TO CH.\NOE
4. AU. LOTS ADJO'NINe AN AR9> OR H',"'NO "'fA W"H A S[NSITIVE ""9> SETBACK ARE.A or, s,NSmVE AREA
TRACI SHALl BE rRo>1V£O 'iTH A 3DUNDM<Y OWN€AT1CN (Ee.. 1L"?"p.°R'< PlASnC "'NClNe) ACCEPT"'U: TO THE
CIW OF ÆOERAl W^' OErA";"ENT OF COMMUNITY o"tLOP"E'" S[F>'CES (CCDõ1, DR 'TS SUCCES50R ACEIfCY
B<:1VÆ" WE LOT OR PC.noNS OF THE LOT .\ND THe.. '"EJ, ."meTED. SAID BO""","Y O£UNEATCN SHALl 9E
iN PC'Cf PRIOR TO 'N( """',NG OR Cl£AAING C' 1He ,U"DIV'SION AN,. REoA'N 'N PtACe UNTIL A DWEIU,," "
CONSTRUCTED 01' THE LOT ""0 ow'tRSH:P TRAt'S",-RR(O TO THE r.R,' OA'NER-OCCUP"".
5. TRACT "A" IS AN E,"'RO"'[N14.LY SEN"">'£ '"9> 'RAeT CON,.N"G w£:!v..'ICS AND/OR WETlAND gUFfERS
"'D'S ."EeY CO:Nè'YtO TO THE HO..EOw,eRS' =oo"'¡'O, IrÆNmm IN NOTE 2, AaO>,£, 'OR ow"RS~:Þ
ANO """'EN",'CE FO"POSES "'-0 '5 m R"'o" UNDsruPRor; (SEE NOTE" .,rH). T"E >tYO>'AL OR O'5ruR6ANCE
0' "EG£TA'IQN AND l.ANaSCA"'G S"'Ll BE ?ROHIBITEa W<THlN """" """, EXCff'1 >S <Ecr:SSARY rOR I.IAJNIt'ANCE
OR "£>'\AC,"EHI Dr "':SONG PI.A.""GS",O AS """'01'£0 8' :><E CITY or 'EJfRAl WAY, "'.cT ',' SHAll NOT
at O"I(LOP£O WITH 'NY BUONes. '-'0 'JAY '01 BE 'JSED coe "'","("L GA;K
6. ffiA';T "B' !S AN OPEN SPI.CE/RECREATION ""G. ,,"0 !S "e,leY CO,^Ð'fD TO TIiE HD"EOWNEPS' ASSOCIATION
10""r'EO I" NUTE 2, "'O'", 'OR OWNERjHIP IoND NAJN',N"'C' PURPOSES.
7, TRACT 'Co ~ . SlOR" o,,",NIoGf moOT ""D IS H'Re"" DED,CA"" TO THE CI1'( C, '[CERA!. ." FOR OWNER-
SHIP ...,C M"N1[N""CE PURPOSES,
B. T'<ACI "DO IS A PRIVATE .cCESS TRACT FCR 'NGFESS, 'GRES' "'0 unUTIES ,oe THE 8mEFIT or THE OWNERS
0' LOTS 12 THROUGH 15 OWN£P.SHIP 0' LOTS 12 IW'O1JCH IS 'NCLUCES AN EOUAL AND UNOMOõD C"NfRSHIP
INTEecs: ," TR.cT °0" AND'" UNOMJED RESPONSIBIU1'( rOR THE ""'<TItlANCE or S"D """" !""LUCING SICRM
CRA"'GE UNES. AN EASE"ENT ,OR "" ",a ALL U"UrES :S HfR'BY co"nro 7O TH[ CW'.ERS or LOTS 12
THRO!;G" 16, THEIR HE!RS. SeCCESSORS AND ASS'GNS OVER. ,,'O,R PNO '",ass S"D 7RACT "D". A sm~I\RY
SEWER ""'"ENT 'S HER,"Y CO!,'<:Yto '0 lA'<E"'VE" unu" CISTR:CT O'IfR EN"" TRA:;T '0'. (SEE "PC'T 0£01-
CA"CN mR NON-"CLUS"~ [<ISE"ENT" loT RIOHT)
9. TPACT T 'S A PROVATE 'OCESS "PACT ;OR :NO"'S, EGRESS <.'0 U',U¡;¡S COR THE BeNEc,T OF '1<E OWNE~s
0' LOTS 17, lB ;80 19. O"""SH" 0, TR.cT "E" ;S HE""' w"tYfD 70 ",E HOMEOWNERS'<SSQClAOON IO£N-
nnm IN NOTE 2, A!JOVE. OWNE;<SHI? OF LOTS ¡ 7, ,. "'0 '9 :NCLUOES AN ECU,," ANO "" )!\'TOED WEMENT IN
mACT °C 'OR INGRESS. ECRESS ",m IiT1LClES, "'NO ..., UNaMOrD ;¡iSPO¡;,",IU:Y rOR '"E W!"1t""' ÇE 0' SAID
P.ACT. "C£pT ;OR STOR" DRAINAGE UNES, AN fA.,,'o.<ENT FOR ANY ""0 AIL uTIL:T1ES IS HEREBY COtMYED TO
1'<£ OWNERS or LOTS 17, IB AND 19, THE'R HEiRS. SU~CESSORS A'" <ISSIGNS O"R UtlOER""O ACROSS S~O
TRACT °E". AiJommWJ.Y." W"tRUNE AND SA"~AHY S"'IR EASEMDIT IS h£Rt9Y CO"'Ð-ED TO l.'KEeAVE" unU1Y
DISTRICT CVER ENDRE TRACT ",' (SEE 'PlAT OF.DICAncN 'DR "CN-£XCLUS~S EAS'M""O AT RISHT) '" O'I[P.-
LYING EASÐJ£I<I IS HEREBY DE"'CAITO TO THE p!;euc 'CR PEOESTPLl.N ACCess O'IER WACT "EO, 10 .lCCESS THE
PEDES1T'.IA.' ACCESS TRACT 'r'. AN OVERL"NG EA$(Noo is "tREaY CON'J[YED TO THE kO"EOWNERS' ASSOClAT1ON
IO["""EO IN NO'!: 2, "'OVE, mR ACCESS TO TRACI 'r' rOR THE .~N1£N'",CE THEREOf, AND FOR THE I.IAJNIL-
""'CE C' THE SICR" DlWI<AC' "c,unES LOCATED >i'" S"O TRACT "E",
10, ""'CT or IS A Pf!>[STq!AN ACCESS TRACI ANO IS HEREBY CD""Elf!> TO THE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOClAnON
laENnTlEO IN NOTE 2, """E, mR O"'ER5>llo AND "'m1tNß"':E ?URPOSES, ADDITION'iCY, A WATERUN[ .,NO
SANITARY SEWER EAS"'E", IS HEREBY COINÐ'£!) 10 lAI<EH"~N UIIUTY CIsmlCT OVER £l<TIRE TPACT or". SEE
"P"'T DEDICATION mR NON-EXCWSOJE EASE"ENr AT RICHT.
11. TRACTS "Go AND "'° ARE OPEN SP.lCE TRACTS, AND ARE H(REBY Co.WEYEO TO 1\;E HC"EOWNERS' <ISSceIATION
!DENTlnED IN NCTE 2, ABOVE, mR OWNERSH'P AND "AI",ENANCE PURPOSES.
12. mocT '1' IS A PEDfST'<iAN ACcrSS TRACI "'0 is HERE!!". CDtM:'f!D TO 11'.£ GI1'( Of FEDERAl WAY 'OR OWNERSHIF
AND ""IITENANCt PURPOSES,
13. TRACT. °Jo 15 .. WlD5C"'£ TRACT, AIID IS HtREB'f CONvEyro TO mE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION IOENT1n£D IN
NOTE 2, ABOVE. FOR OWNERSHIP AND "AINTENANCE ?IJftPOSfS, '" EASE"ENT rOR INGRESS, ECRESS AND ununEs
O'J(R THE ENTIRE TRACT °Jo IS HEREBY D€D<CA1EOTO T>tE CITY 0' FEDERAl WAY. NO smUCTURE. INCLUDING
SlGN..œ OR "ONU"ENTS SHAll BE AlLOW'£D O\'£R msT1NG STO"", DAANNJ£ PTPES AS D£1tRMINEO BY TH£ FEDERAl
WAY pU8UC WORKS STORM WAIER -..cOÆNT OMSION.
~UTY ~~R ~r'~o\~¿/.;~=~s S~M~:~ ~~& ~~"&"ir"~ ~0l.'K~:m
SEwER SER\1CE. (SEE "P...T DEiJTCATION 'OR NON-ÐCCLUSIVE EASEMENT" AT RICHT)
15, ALL STOR" ORAJNACE EASE"ENTS (SUE) NOTED HEREON ARE PUBUC AND ARE HEREBY OfD CATED TO THE
CITY or ÆDEIW. WAY FOR THE CONsmucTlON, I.IAJNIENANCE AIID REP"R OF STOR" ORÞJIOOE "ClUT1£S,
16. All """'AlE STOR" ORAlNAGE EASE"ENTS (PSOE) ImT£D HEREON ARl PRIVATE "'0 ARE Hr.REBY CON'ItYED TO
LOT OWNER WHO WOULO BENWT FROM THE EASl"CNT, THE OWNERS OF SA>O LO15 ""VI"" BENõm SHALL BE
EQUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE "AtNTENANCE AND RePAIR or THE IJRA NAGt "ClunES W1TH1N THE EASEMENT.
" THE 10' PRIVATE STORM ORAJNACE EASEM"', (PSQE) Wif"1N LOTS 2 THROUGH 4 IS FOR THE eENEfTI 0'
LOTS 1 IHROUCH 4,
B, THE 10' PRNATE STORM DR"NACt EASE1.!ENI (PSQE) W:THIN LOTS 7 THROUGH 11 IS rOR THE BENEFIT OF
LOTS 6 THROUOH 12.
C. THE 10' PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE EASE"E", (PSDE) WiTHIN LOTS 22 THROUGH 24 IS '00 THE BENEm Dr
LOTS 22 THROUGH 25
0 THE 10' PRIVAIE SIORM DRÞJNAGE EASE"ENT (pSOE) WlmlN LOTS 27 AND 2B IS mR THE BENEfTI O, LOTS
LOTS 26 THRO1JGH 2B.
E. THE 10' PRIVATt STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT (PSDE) WiTHIN LOTS 29 THROUCH J.3 IS FOR THE BENEfTI Of
LOTS LOTS 29 THROUCH 34.
F. THE 10' pRIVATE STORt.I DRAINAGE EASE"ENT (PSDE) WlrnIN LOTS 35 THROUCH 37 IS FOR mE 9[NEm 0'
LOTS LOTS J5 THROUGH JB.
G. THE 15' PRIVATt STOR" DRAJNADE EASE"ENT (PSOE) WITHIN LOTS 4J AND .. IS FOR THE BENEFIT or LOTS
LOTS 41 THROUGH <5.
II. THE 10' PRIVATE STOR" DRAlNACE EASENENr (PSDE) WITHIN LOTS 47 AND 4B ~ rOR THE BENEfTI or LOTS
LOTS 46 THROUGH 49,
17. THE: R(W) ""0 STOR" DRAINAGE sYST£I S SMAll BE CCNsrntJCTED ACCORDiNG TO THE APPROvED PlAN AND
PRCf1tt, PERMIT NO, 02-105745-000-00-£1< ON nu: WITH THE CITY 0' FED£R.OI. WAY. "" O[W.TION FROM THE
APpROVED PlANS W1U REOUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAl. FRO" THE PROPER ACENcY,
lB. THE smEET TRfES, PlAN1tQ AS A CONOII1ON OF PlAT APPROVAl., SHAll BE PlANTED ACCORDING TO THE
APPROVED ENGINfER1NG PlANS, pER"IT NO. D2-I05745-ooo-oo-EN, ON nLE W111< THE CITY OF ÆOERAl WAY.
T\« smE£T mfES P1.ANT£D WITHIN ANO/CR ABUTTING INDMOUAI. LOTS AND PlANTER STRIP SHALL BE N,\ NT~NED
BY THE OWNERS OF SA1O LOTS, AND 11<E STRE£:! TREES PlANILO WITHIN AND/OR "'VTnNG THE PRIVATE AND
PúBUC TRACTS WITHIN THIS PlAI SHÞI.L BE OWNED "'0 I.IAJNTAINEO BY THE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION.
I', THE BU1l.D1NG SETBACK UNES ON CORNER LO15 HAVE BEEN SHOWN WITH A TYP\CAI. I'RONT YARD SETBACK,
HOWEVER. PER FEDERAl WAY CITY CODE SEcnON 22-1 (DEnNmONS °PROPERTY UN£") THE !'RONT PROPERTY
UNE ON CORNER LOTS NAY BE ON £ITHER STRm, WITH THE BUilDiNG SETBACK UNES REVISED ACCOROINGlY.
CITY <lLE NO. OJ-10J107-OQ-SU
MERIDIAN
PLAT DEDIC.~TlON FOR NON-EXCLUSiVE EASEMENT
'" £AS[Yf>IT ,S heREBY 'RREVOCABLY REs<~,m '0'> ""0 ORAlITEO 10 L"'ErA"" uT,LT\' ",".'CT, ns >1£IRS, S';CŒSSûRS
'", ""5~NS, 'C' SO lO1 S AS " S>W.l. 'JoT< "'" """,,iN THE o'OUTIES RE"""¡NCED HiliiN LN;é' "'0 0'011 T>' <%\
S"""" 0'. rNE FlAT "'° OESERle'" HER"N AS ",m'.c'" ¡ASE""" OR """"'If' SEWE,' USoUE'l1" TO Ok;>""'- ","'T~",
REPLACE. R[PIJ' >.'0 OPEP;." W"'ER <NO SEW," "~"' "0 APP1;RTENANCES m. ""$ SU9CMjiCN AND 0,","
"!CP"" TOGE1"é' "r" "" ~OH 70 ";;ER uPC" '^'" ["""';1; AI A" nuES roe "" PjmSi ST1.'£O. Nû eUlf,~G,
HAL!.. ROC"", FENCE, TKEfS C. S7R'JCDJRE Of ,,"Y ""'0 SHU B!. EREm, OR o""ED, 'CR SI'A!.L ""~ me
..AlfR~L BE o""'EO W""'N niE aouNN""S Of SNO OOE"E<T 4R!A ,.0 EXCAYA7IOH S"ALl BE y,I)E .""1:1
rHREE FE£:! J' SAID .A:tR .OR SEwcR SERVO';E fAQlcJTlES ""0 THE SUR.AOE L~L Of THE CfOU"J '/liTH" "'E
Ek"Y~'" AAfJ, S'~LL eE "AiNTAiNED >T THE ELEVAnON AS C.IFRENTl' EXIS"NG. G"""'OR """,nc""", I,?A'TS
TO THE GRA-'TEE. WE <lSE Cf SUCH ACO,I1ONA!. 'RfJ> IM"£D'ATELY A(>'1.CENT TO "'0 E.lSEMEN! APEA AS SH",-
BE REou;RI'D rOR THE CONSTRLOTICN, '<£CON51'"01l0N, """TEN,,",CE AND OPFRAll0N D' s<'O WA,," OR SE"ER
'.lCIL1T1!'S. """ USE 'or SUCH 'ADomow.. A!>!J,;n.lll '" I'IflD m , >f.JSONA!)iE "'HlM'J" AND B£ ~F:1URNEO
fO THE CONOIT1{1N EX'STINe '"',<EO"""Y BITeR[ THE PRO?"'" WAS ."TERED ePCN BY GRANTEE OR US 'CENTS.
," ÞrÆlno" TO ;;;[ 01l<'R RE""onC", HERE'N. GRANTOR S"'Li. NOT CO""',.,. TO A ""'RD P4R1'( .<NY EASt\EKT
OR CTHER RIGHT O, US.'.CE " 'HE FRCFERr' W",CH WOULO MP"~ CR ,,",T THE GRl<NE£'S OSE Of TeE EASE-
',!ENT"""
DRAINAGE EASEMENT RESTRICTiONS
""'-'O'URES, "L!., CR 09STRUC'ICNS ([<CLUDiNG DECKS, P'TIOS, C. O""""'GS) S"ALL 'aT DE "ER",nD
W1THIN OR~NAO' EASEMõ"S. 'JJOI"Ct~l.LY, GR""NC AND CO"""'O'OI>: OF ".C'," SHALL .OT i!£ 'LlOWE'
WITH'" TnE IJRA1NACE """MENTS SHOWN ON n':s P"" "Þi' UNLESS OTIiEeW,SE ""'POVED EY 'HE !IO"ECWNE""
,",SOC:<TICN.
RESTRICTIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAlLY SENSmVE ARfA TRACTS ANa SENSI11'IE AREAS AND BUFFERS
DEDICA"O' c' A SENSI1M 'REA TRi'CT/SENSI1I>,£ ""fA. 'NO euweR CON'","S TO THE PJ3CK: " BE"[fiC!AL
:NTEREST IN THE LAN" WTThIN !HE TR"CT/seNS""" '.EA "10 9u~FR. !HIS "ITREST "'CLUOCS THE pRES,"-
VATION OF NAT,,", "EG£TAm" ;OR AlL P",POSES THAT BEN"iT IHE °U8e10 H""TH. SAFD. AND wE,-,ARE,
"'CLUDINS co",,"CL OF SU",ACE ViAT" AND EROSION. I.<~NTEf""CE D' SLe"E ST;3iUTY. AIm ?ROTEceCN 0'
"WIT AND AN!"At HAB~AT. T"E SfNSlT", >REA T...CT/Sf'S'"'E ",,-,<NO eum:R IMPOSE "PC' ~L PRES"'T
~e:~;:;.R~?;~t"..~6~ ~~'~r¡s:ii[ FT~9~,,"'t? ,W'~i$C6f T~D~ T:'~C'f~E~~~"&~..~ ~~l :.'::S
eeriER VEGE'iA"O" VirTHI" THE T?ACT!SENSI"'E \REA ~NO BUm:~. "'E ',tC£!'Anc" WITH;N THE ;mT/SENS,"'E
"'fA .~'O BumR MAY NOT BE CUT, p'uNm, COVE"EO ¡"Y "lL """>ED O. CAYAVE~ WITHCUT APFROVA!. 'N
."mNe fROI.! ThE CITY CF rtDER}L WAY OEPAf!NENI CF COY'IU"'lY DEI'[1 oP"OO 5[~'CES CR <;S SUCCESSOR IŒ'~Y.
WE CWMCN BOUND""" BÐWEPI "'E 'RACT/SENSTT1VE MEA AlTO Bem" k<O fH!: ARC< OF ",,!LOP"'NT AcnVIT'!
"UST 6£ "ARKEC OR OTHERWISE rtAGGŒ TO :HE 5>"5'.AC'10N c. THE C'TY or m>£F>L WAY PRieR TO AI"
ClEARING, =".G, BCIlD'Ne Co.'S'RUCllCN CR OTHER OC\B.D?MENT .\OTI"'Y eN A LCT SUBJECT TO n<E SENSIThE
"R£A TRACT/SENSITI\~ AREA AND eUfTER. THE REQUIRED _";NO GR FlAGC"G SHALL RE"'" :N ?lACE UNT'L
AU. DEVELOPME'" PROPOSAl. ACTMnES IN THE ",C,,:1'( O, THE .SfNSmloE 4REAA/I£COMFW-<D
SENSI"',£ AREA TRACTS SHAll. NOI BE D£V!:LOP[O WITH "" eUIU).'NCS, <'0 'lAY !>lOT 6£ USED mR """"cw. GAIN.
PLAT NOTES AND RESTRICTIONS (CONTINUED):
2C. A plAT CERTlfTCATE pREPARED 9Y FiDELITY ....no.." nnE CO"P,", Of WASHiNGTON, TH£lR ORDER NO, 124m
"'0 DATEO Juey 2B, 2003 WAS REUED UPON FOR RECORD ITEMS MFfCTING THIS SUBOMS"". ACCORDING;o TH'S
DOC!;""", THE mLLOWING ITEMS "¡-"ECT THIS SiTL
" ,," EASE",NT AND CONOIIlONS CCNTAINEC THERCTN. mR ELJ:cmlC TWoNS"I5SION U>IE AS RECORDED UNDeR
RECORD""C NO 3194512. THIS EASE"EN! IS GRAPHICALlY DEPICTED ON SHEET 4.
B. "OIU1Y C!IARC£S, If Joo'ff, INClUDING 8ITI NOT U"'TtO TO HOCK-UP, CR CONNECTION CHARGES "'0 ...TtCONER
CHARGES mR WAILR ANO SEWER ,-'CiunES BY FEDERAT. WAY WATER AND S£WER AS RECORD£D UNDER ReCORCING
NO. B90S12D21O.
C. ..., EASE"EN! rOR RIGHT Of WAY, AND THE 1tR1.IS "'0 GDNOmCNS T\-TEREDF AS RECORDED UNDER RECOROINC
'O. 2oooo53oooT640. THIS EASE"ENT IS GRi'PHICAllY DEPICTED ON SHm 4 WITHIN WE PROf'OSf!> ~1CH~-
OF-WAY 'OR SW 344TH STRm.
0, A TE"PORAN\' -- SEWER EASE",NT, AND THE TERMS AND co.,omONS !1<EREO' AS RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NO. 2oo103120G0348. THIS EASE"EN! IS OIT-SITt.
E. A CaNsmUCT<>N EAsEMENT, AND THE TER"S ""0 CONCmoNS TIiEREOF AS RECORDED UNDER RœoRO1NG
NO. 2C02C2D4OO0039. THiS EASEM,,~ 15 OfT -SITE.
" A CONST1!'JCTION EA:5£"ENI, "0 THE TER"S AND CONOmeNS THEREO' AS RECORDED UNOfR RECORDiNG
NO, 200204150003", THIS EAS"ENT IS OfT-SITE.
e. A CONsmucnON EASE1<E"'. ANO THE TERI./S AND CONcmONS TH'REOf AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING
NO. 2CO2070300171C. THIS EASE","T IS 0;r-5I1L.
H. A UCENSE. AND THE TERMS AND CONomONS TH"'EO' TC 1I<E CI1'( Of FEDERAl WAY :0 INSPECT AND N~N-
T"N THE IMPROVEMENTS AS RECORDED UNDER RECORCINe NO. 2e'l13D53000D9S7.
~
-
0
,
;;
]
0
~
21. THERE SHAU. eE NO VEHICUUIR ACCESS TO OR "OM sw 3"TH smm ANO 12TH AVENUE '3W "'OM THOSE
LOTS WHICH 'BUT THEM.
EXHIBIT ----'L-
PAGE--3-0F -k-
0
0
....
m
0
....
ó
~
~
,g
:: ':'1:;;
~ j'\!DB.NO. 10715
.
a
g
0
~
~
~
t
is ?
! ~
~[
;;
..
Barghausen JA:: 22 2ëD4
Consulting Engineers, Inc.
C;';I Engineering, Lond PI","~g, Su"'~ng, En- SeM:a
1821S 12nd """'e South Kent.." 98032
Telephone: (425) 251-6222 'o~ (425) 251-B782
SW1/4 OF NW1/4, SEC. 19, T21N-R4E, W.M.
SHEET 3 OF 6
SECTION
CUR\£ T.IBLE
CUR\£ LOT NO. UNG1H R.IORJS
C1 LOT 5 39.21' 25.00'
C2 LOI 4 39.21' 2500'
CJ LOT I 39.'" 25.00'
C4 LOT 50 39..'5' 25.00'
C5 LOI 43 39.2T 2500'
C6 LOT 42 38.21' 25.00'
1:1 LOI 31 3.04' 25.00'
CII LOT J6 121T 2500'
C9 LOT J6 4O.1J' 53.00'
C10 LOI J5 44.00' 53.00'
CII _I I 21...' 53.00'
C12 11I.OCT 0 89.34' 53.00'
C13 LOT 34 56.11' 53.00'
CH lOT 34 25.06' 2500'
C15 LOT 29 39.21' 25.00'
CI6 LOT 29 JUT 25.00'
CH LOT 31 8-80' 3<5.00'
C18 LOT 34 22.34' 3<5.00'
C18 11I.OCT G 31. 25.00
C2O IRACI H 41.48' 25.00'
C21 11I.OCT H 44.33' 415.00'
CITY FlLE NO. 03-103107-00-SU
BEING A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF
19, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLA METTE
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
1~ ! I ~ I . SEE SHEET 5
,{.'.J LSBP:4G"'"E ",.oo,_i L
-" 'I "'-8 --, I'
~I "56'F ! 18
;:0;1' ". '.~
',~ J i
-OM"ô'", "'00' '-\
8 !D"'" 7 --i/.'
;; :iiI i 6)1<1 £E. :,~
E,] -- J I
t = 1* .."', "'.00' \ 28' 28'
-c , r---'--;--~ I
:3 iii ~ 6,2TO£E! ¡~
~ L 'ô"" 114.00.J '~
3 -'-
§ 5'8S11.5--11~
6.106 £E ~~, ,"
1~1Æ' ¡;¡~;
E --- --.i{.
8900'
<0
C'J
,-
>-
,'~c
:5
~
142 '
SOUT1f IÆ CO'oÐIHWOO LOT 2
""
Ì/¡
, --
',"'"[;'o.:;[
J
ORCHID
LANE
MERIDIAN
'{'
"i~
~:~
¡~
.\i
-7
I
I
i
~i
~~I
:z: -,
t- ,
~,
28'
c
~
~
~
<0
t':'
,-
-(
Ö;
:5
~
þ
¡¡¡
,
I
¡
I
I
~~
""-
J
I
28'
\ !
~
-v'
COOIJU<£ ~~--
-- ~
<
I
~--r-----",
I I '-
I '" I '-,-
/ ",'1 /. P;'RK~;'~~[ [S~;,~[S
/ / '-'-, "-,
'"",-,"
.~"-~'
,~=
:~
c
~
.
,.
,.
,.
,.
/
~'" 0 //::,,' '",i: :J"r; û- '0
VI" ~,. we.. 'w, ,\1~. " "
;/
,
5
28'
28'
LEGEND
@ PlIoT CORI<rR SET (SIr SlIR'Æ'rOR'S NOTE J, SHŒT 2)
*@ lÐD N<1) TACK SET IN ROC1ŒRr AT PlAT CORNER
SET CITY OF f[DfJ!Al WAY SlAI<OAAO IIOAO IMJNUWOO
.. SET 3/" G/WHl1ID IROH PPE WITH PlJS11C C»' AT un
roAAIJiS
* .. lÐD N<1) TACK SET " ROC1ŒRr AT LOT CORNDIS
WA!!RUNE fJæÆJfT (sa: NOTE H, SHŒT 3)
PSOE PRIVATE S1URJ/ - £ASÐjOO (sa: NOTE 16, SHŒT 3)
lIE UTUtY fJæÆJfT (sa: 'tÞSOIENTS NIl) RESmVATIONS', SHŒT 2)
PAT. PID£ST1<WI I<ŒSS 1RJCT
BS8l BUlOING SE1BI<1C UHE
s.r. SQU.\RE rn:r
c
C
UH£ TAILE
UHE Lor NO. UNG1H B£AAJHC
l1 a. ROAD II.O ' Jæ"'2"W
12 1RJCT H 1O.'" Jæ51',,'W
U II!ICTI IS."" "'I'02""W
L4 lR.ICII 23.77 "'I'OtH'W
JOB MO. 10715
. :Barghausen JAto! 222004
Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Ci.1 Enqineerinq, lom! PIooo;"9, SuMy;"9, úMroo"""lol -
18215 12m! Aveo", South Kenl, WA. 98032
T.~phone: (425) 251-6222 ro" (425) 251-8782
i
¡:¡ ;
! ¡
~ ;
NOTE:
TI<OSE Lor UNES INTtRSEC11NG C1JfNEO
LOT UNES OR RIGHT-or-WAY UNES NOT
NOTED AS RAOI.Al [(R)] ARE NON-"""'"
SW1/4 OF NW1/4, SEC. 19. T21N-R4E. W.M.
SHEET 4 OF 6
~~~. ]
c=
=~ .
;~ ~
;:=;: g
. ._-) ~
. su a1Y I:F fIJJÐtIL WAY STONOoIRO ROAD wOtMÆNf :¿~ ;::,
& ~GAlY~Qrn::EXBIBIT'>= ~
* ~oc == =,tmÌ9:6~o F-=: 0
.u WATlJ<UNE £JSOII}IT (SŒ '::~J8 ,== .
SSE SAHfT.IRY SEW!JI £/&IlOO (SŒ 'OJ[ ", SHEET JJ ,'~ %
PAY. PEDESTRIAH I<ŒSS lR>CT .~ ~
lIE U11U1Y fA$O ÐIT (SŒ ~ AND '!5ÐMTIOIIS", SHEET 2)-~ 3
S.F. - fIT! ~
BS13LIMlDOIICSU!IÞ£ (lJ ( ~
Barghausen !
Consulting Engineers. Inc. 0
Ci.' ÚI<J""rin9, Land Planni<>9, Su~, !Jwironmental SeMen ~ ;;;
18215 nnd A""ue So,th Ken!, W" 98OJ2 ~ g
Telephone: ('25) 251-6222 Fo" (425) 251-8782 ~ ~
~ ó:
ORCHID
LANE
SECTION
BEING A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF
19, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST WILLAMETTE
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
MERIDIAN
r25'ID<PC~o;(1'~<tŒffi
RR NO. 100'0312""'"
r'" 511'""" """' '-'SOI¡}{T
.~ --- -+ Pre ~~200I~':"
I .
-r-----'
I I' I
""""",,",,,~E1oSOIDII--1 l- ¡
:~=:;J==- [WOO : H ;--
~==-'J\ I, I ¡ !
'IK!<J.200207Q3001710 r------'i'h
;;¡: I I I
I . I
I I '
'2'.5" \ ".2<' i~ "",'
I\? t¡;
, , -;\--:.
~\ ..:\::~~
\ $ ~~:
TRACT J ~i.-
LANDSCAÆ JR.ICT \ ':'11-:
[) .~
¡ 2\;
SlORU T= wf; -" ~tr
/ ~Joi "'\ 1\
I ""
1!iJE ¡11.:, 35: 21'
/w/ S rm. ~ \ I
SlIOCUUT $! I
IJ)fotR lÐ1 -'}-.. S'1\ ' : i
I ~JiI I 1
',,'sœ ! I I
w/S' rm. I
\ \ I I
- Na>-OJ:SC'\v9«~' -I~' / I'
I~'J ~ .
~ ~I
.,;:P: ;.~~é.~
/51)""'"'£0<""'"""
"""'lOIUIIlOi¡
284-'7'
TRACT B
OPEN SPIŒ/R£CREAmN ffilj;T
"'85'
~
181.00'
~
"":J' on,:,"
Un, UIO ,~U
---
/',. ,
,/
,/
I
I
" DETAIL
HOse,ou:
,
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
\
\
\
\
Í ;-'¥il) 35' ~ 21'
sœ
W/ 5' rm.
,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
,
" N85'QJ'SO'" ...". - /
\ I 1\N I
\ TRACTB ;1;;¡¡ I
\ I
" 1 I
" ,/
'-- ,.,.
l£GEND
UHE TABU:
UHE lOT "0, lING1\< arm<c
1I IR'oCT B lo.ocr 588'46'24"£
11 lR>CT C 7.0Cr 1i88'46'24"
LJ lR>CT C 7.2" "",.,,'36"(
l<{,j lR>CT C 7.00' S&:J'OJ'I6'"
l5 UJT22 ,.",' SO\'13"""
Lß LOT 20 20.60' 1<29'59""'"
l7 lOT 11 27.1T 52T211'08"
LB T'ICrr 17."" I<QI",'I6"£
L9 lR>CT J 7.24' SO\'1J'36"
1I0 lR>CT B 10.20' H17JO'45"
LI1 lR>CT B 20.36' NJO'J8'O8"(
~ WOI<UWÐIT muM> OS I<QT!D ON SHEET 1
'" PlAT CORN(R SET (SII SU!MYOR'S 1<)1£ J. SHEET 21
* @ lOO AND T,ICI( SU ~ I!OCIŒRY AT PlAT CORNER
TRACT C
l'
~'$ ~
¡::;: ~
51 a:
I-
CURl'£TA8t.£
ClJrM: LOT 1<). lD<CTIi IWiUS D!l" ~AHC£I(
C, 1Tt>CT C 34.89' 430.00' ~J8'55' 17.45'
C2 lR>CT J !J,BS' 'JO,OO' 11'10'20" 4~O6'
CJ lR>CT C 8l48' moo' 11'10'20' 41.J7'
C4 LOT 28 JUT 25,00' 90'00'00' 25.00'
es UJT22 JUT 25.00' 90'00'00' 25.00'
C6 lR>CT B 18.41)' 25.00' 4r",'48" ..,,'
C7 lR>CT B 22."" 53.00' 2'52'5" 11.21'
C8 UJT21 36.7J' 53,00' 39'42'20" 19.14'
C'I LOT20 41).7,,' 53.00' "'( 5'JO" 21.46'
CTO lR>CT E 38.,,' 53.00' 'ro7'1O" 20.'"
CI1 lR>CT 0 J8.'" 53.00' 4roo'54 20"'-
CI2 UJTI1 J'.02' 5300' JJ'J2"'" ,~.T
C1J lOT 11 Uso' 25.00' 5.rSI'W IUO'
C14 LO" JO.46' 259.00' ~,,"8" T5.25'
m nw:Tf ",,' "'00' '"'00'00" .1000'
15' sœ
w/ 5' rm.
-'I!-
TOO
."",1
0 25
1\ ¡
[
J
""-"Ie""
~
en
wå¡
~!
~~
:%:W
.....
~
::1
::j
II
..1
~I
~I
I
/co
L'J
I ;~
I :5
I
I
~I
¡¡i¡
~
¡¡¡I
I
è~
I
\
.
~
~
~
HOT'(,
rnose: LOT UNES INTERSECTING CURVED
LOT UNES OR RIGHT-OF-WAY UNES HOT
HOTED AS RACIAl [(R)] AAE NON-RADIAL
SW1/4 OF NW1/4, SEC. 19. T21N-R4E, W.M.
SHEET 5 OF 6
~
"""'1""
ORCHID
LANE
SECTION
BEING A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF
19, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
MERIDIAN
0
~.~
:ë
B:
:5
I
I
~~;?L;' ~~E~ :
I
I
I
-------, -
'-"-- 256.'"
: : : ::"\-' ~
:~::::::::::::y~
. : ' : . : ' : . : ' : ' : ' : . : . : ' : ,)
. .' , . . ' .' " ,',' , ' .'. ' (
::::::::::::::::::::)
~:.:.:,:.:.:,:,:,:,:.{
~' :': ': . : .:':. :. : ':' : '\
~""'(WOlANO),,-.
.~,',','.','.'.','.'.' ...\
~-:-:':-:'>:-:-:-:-:.»
~ ' : . : ' : ' : ' : ' : ' : ' : . : ,:r
s ' . , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , ,. ~
~§ .,.",.""",.,,-,,{
:1' ::::::::::::::::::::}
, . . , , . , . , , ,
""0' .nr~
v", L'" ,¡u
SOU!II II( or ""'" <It
/XM)NjOO WI 2
TRaCY j
10
I-
W
W
:I:
C/)
W
W
C/)
TRACT A
SAT.
. . . . - , . . , . .
, , . , , , , , . ,
, . . . , , . , . .
. , , , , , . , , ,
, , . , , , , . , .
;-.','.'.',',','252.46"
""~I HTm
v.., L'" ICU
SW 342ND PLACE
."""437.00'
:&00'
LEGEND
@ PlAI OORHER S(T (SIr SlJR\'E' ()'~ NOTE 3, SlID' 2)
* @ I£.OD NC) TACI( SET " ROCIŒRY AT PIAl CORNER
. S(T CJ1Y or ÆJJÐt\I. WAY STANOAAO ROO UOHUIIE1fT
. SET 3/" CAlVN«ZED !RON PIP( \11TH PlAST1C eN' AT LOT
COAN£RS
.
ç
* . I£.OD NC) TACI( SET " ROC1ŒR\' AT LOT CORN£RS
Wl£ WATERUNE £ASOIOO (sa: NOTE 14. SHEET 3
SS( SANIT"'" SE-..R £ASÐ4EI<T (sa: NOTE 14, SHEET J)
IÆ tII1U1Y r.<;Ð<OO (SIt 'EASOIEIIlS II«> RES!R\lAT1Ot<S', SHŒT 2)
8S8l - SET8ACI( UIŒ
51, - FŒT
SAT. SCIS111I'E ARfA TRICI
SS( SNiIT"'" SE-..R f.4SÐ/£I f (sa: NOn: 14, SHEET 3)
SEE SHEET 4
EXHIBJT -
PAGE~OF
lIfE
LI
11
U
l4
L5
1I
lJH[ T.<a£
LOT NO, lf1fC11<
LOT " 11.06'
LOI 13 20,00'
LOT '8 23,6'
lOT 15 24.71
lOT 15 22."
LOT '6 27.06'
Barghausen JA~ 2 2 ;=,,~
Consulting Engineers. Inc.
:1~1;-n(/;:~;,,~and~noin~~T,~';;"mtntaf So".",
T"'phone' ('25) 251-6222 r.., (425) 251-87112
0 25 50 '00
I"L '\'.",.~., ¡
SCAI,£, " - so'
SW1/4 OF NW1/4, SEC. 19, T21N-R4E, W.M.
SHEET 6 OF 6
J
j
~
~
<
,¿:d 1
~';f? .
.~~-;:;~ ~
.~ ~
-==
')~ t
:'::=' ~
:,= 8
'i."" !
~:~ i
;,.,~ ~
<-" ~
<
g
¿;.
1;
~ i
~ ê
~ íi.
JOB NO. '0715
CUlM T.<a£
CLOM; lOT NO. lDIGTH RIOOS I 00.1> ~ANCEH1
CI lOT19 47.12' 30.00 I 90'00'00'1 30.00'
C2 I lOT 17 120.12' 5300 12"4505'110"8'
OJ LOT 16 2'.15 53.00 2~4518 ItOO'
CITY riLE NO. OJ-103107-00-SU
;;
,:::
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF
ORCHID LANE, FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, FILE NO. 03-
103107 -OO-SU
WHEREAS, on October 22,2002, the Federal Way Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on the
preliminary plat application resulting in the November 1,2002, Recommendation of the Federal Way Hearing
Examiner and November 7, 2002, Hearing Examiner Correction; and
WHEREAS, the preliminary plat for Orchid Lane, City of Federal Way File No. 00-100947 SO, was
approved subject to conditions on December 3,2002, by Federal Way City Council Resolution No. 02-379;
and
WHEREAS, the applicant submitted the application for final plat for Orchid Lane within the required time
of receiving approval for the above-referenced preliminary plat; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has satisfied all ofthe conditions set forth in Resolution No. 02-379; and
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services and Public
Works Department staff have reviewed the proposed final plat for its conformance to the conditions of
preliminary plat approval, and their analysis and conclusions are set forth in the March 9, 2004 Staff Report,
which is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has complied with the conditions of the mitigation measures of the July 2,2002,
State Environmental Policy Act Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance as discussed in the March 9,
2004, Staff Report; and
WHEREAS, the City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee considered the application and staff
report for the Orchid Lane final plat at its March 15,2004, meeting and recommended approval by the full City
Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the Staff Report and the application for final plat
for Orchid Lane during the Council's April 6, 2004, meeting.
EXHIBIT '-
PAGE--LOF -3
File #03-1031 07-00-SU I Doc ID 26046
Res. # - Page 1
Now THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings and Conclusions.
1.
The final plat for Orchid Lane, City of Federal Way File No. 03-1031 07-00-SU, is in substantial
conformance to the preliminary plat and is in conformance with applicable zoning ordinances or other land use
controls in effect at the time the preliminary plat application was deemed complete.
2.
Based on, inter alia, the analysis and conclusions in the Staff Report, which are adopted herein by
reference, and on the City Council's review of the application for final plat, the proposed subdivision makes
appropriate provision for public health, safety, and general welfare, and for such open spaces, drainage ways,
streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and
recreation, play grounds, and schools and school grounds as are required by City Code, or which are necessary
and appropriate, and provides for sidewalks and other planning features to assure safe walking conditions for
students who walk to and from school.
3.
The public use and interest will be served by the final plat approval granted herein.
4.
AU conditions listed in the Federal Way Resotution No.'O2-J19 have been satisfied, and/or
. satisfaction of theooRditions ha"le.beeRsufticiently güaranteedby theapplioaRt as allowed byF1!áeral Way
City Code Section 20-135.
5.
All required improvements have been made and/or sufficient bond, cash deposit, or assignment of
funds have been accepted as a guaranty for completion and maintenance of all required plat improvements, as
identified in the March 9, 2004, Staff Report.
6.
All taxes and assessments owing on the property being subdivided have been paid, or will be paid,
prior to recording the final plat.
Section 2. Application Approval. Based upon the Findings and Conclusions contained in Section 1
above, the final plat of Orchid Lane, City of Federal Way File No. 03-1031 07-00-SU, is approved subject
to satisfaction of compliance with plat conditions and conditions required by the Public Works Director as
identified in the Staff Report and as required by ap~XHC¡BsITd POlict:
Res. #_page2 PAGE-LOF j'ile #O3-1O31O7-00-SU /DocID26046
Section 3. Recording. The approved and signed final plat, together with all legal instruments
pertaining thereto as required pursuant to all applicable codes, shall be recorded by the applicant in the
King County Department of Records. The applicant shall pay all recording fees.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution should be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality
shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this
resolution.
Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority, and prior to the effective date, of the
resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal
Way City Council.
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this
2004.
day of
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Mayor, Dean McColgan
A TrEST:
City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC
ApPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
EXHIBIT '-
PAGE-3-.0F Ì-
RESOLUTION No:
Res. # - Page 3
File #03-1031 07-00-SU I Doc ID 26046
"0100'
¡ IY 'f ~
DENSITY CALCS.
-"'~~--
,.m, """..~" " "
:."', "",,'::,~;, ~ ':;;':.
TRACT TABLE
"~"-">
"',"'S,t.
...'"
LOT AREA TABLE
"" 1"""'1 I "" t?"""
-~\----;;;-,'-J-',', - ._n,_"",,-,
; :::: \ ;; 1 ;;~:
~ ~;;: :; ¡ :;;:
~ I ~;,,_: :: :,::;
. "', B "".
'.~ :;'.; I;~ : ~,~.~.'
" "" " ",,'
:: I ~¡: ~ ¡¡:;
:: I ;~:', 'I :: I ~~,~
:; :¡:: :: I ~~;~
;: I ;;~,',' I :; i ~,~:,:,'
;; ;-::,' I :: : ;:.:
" "", I ., I ~A.'
~ , :::: , ;; I :;~;
"'~ '" -. ".m ,,- .." "'
"'~ "'","'" "'.0" u. ,... "'.
w,~ ""'" ,¡w ",."" u, .... ""
m'~ "..." - ..,"" "C "."' "'
~_ià.ÇF1[PTION
""""
'" ,",1 """'" ~ ",¡ ""'" ,..11 " ". ,'^" ","'O". OC W"""
',""0', ,'1. ,~.,~" ",'~ '".CO,~" ""'. ," ",,"M'"
M'~"" "" """ "., """ .." " ;" ,.." " " ""...,. ,"" .'
"'" ... ""," ". ~ '" """."" w' ,
"""" """""."'.~. ""tu,~.'""",
",,""""~~"""""'""""""""'~"',""""""""'"
"....."-,,V'«""".',,""""'-'".""~~'"
.""", "" ",,-mΠ.~. """"",","if.
,.., ......""" "",..~ '" ,. "co." ". "",.."., " """'. ~" ,
~'. n. ," ",,< "'-,"'. """"',", ,,"'..,., ,~"'.,
~,.""""<""".."",.."..".","""..,..,,,,.
,.."" """~"" ...." ,",t." 'm
'~,"",n"""'rn""'""".""W""'-"""""""""
"'",.".
""« ",so "'" "",
""..r""" '" "".
,.."'"",,"',"'-
'.." ....'" ". """ ,., "'" ,,' OC'.<-"-'
"'~"" '" ",,"" ""', W" ~ ..,>, ",,'".
'" """", '" "'0 """'" "'" ,'" "'" ",m ~ "" ",.." '" ,,"
"""'SO""""""""",,"""""""""""""," ,.."
V'"",",",.""""""""""""""
"..", . ,,< ""'" .. .,~. "'" " "".""".,
PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 LOT CLUSTERING
OF
ORCHID LANE
A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 Of SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 21. RANGE 4, W.M,
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON
I
I-r
r-¡ ,
: !
II .
--.-iT
I
i
!
¡
I
"
--
.
I
,..J
"\" """"-'-' ~
"- .
-, -"\.\"i~l,_"~\;IJI ";':"1 T
, , "",,""'r'W"I~i<;no'l, ,,"
!"""r:c:.-"',':CI',',TR,i:."-J.:,2,',,',1'" 1
, - (' , fj )' '-. 'C..) '¡
TRAeT~\ ~1;,"~~~;' \_be
"r 'f.',(,t,:,',-,.,~,',',,",-,;';','is,:~~.,',',,,,',",,',,'','.'",<"""",'-\"'""""""""",,,",;"",' ,\d"""
I i",~(:J:'\ ,f., é
, " ~""':-1"'".,',"",',9,.',-',,,,' 1',2,j2,3"I,',,:,2,'~',-,j,.','-,'C,-",:'",-',"'-'-,;~¡
'd'" CZ1< ~+';:tì~,¡
,; """"""""",,',"j"',',' ,t,',','", ,',",,',,;,1,""",',"",',,'\' ,,',"',',',,',ì"'¡'i--
:,':,--.",'", ð,': I,',~"',,',.¡",,,',,',-,',"-- .,' ~':,"'," " "
",<'r'"]'"' 'I',;;
----' y~ " ~~ ,I' ~;-.) :, ,3,? .- '
-"---'!,--r;,'",o,Ao,i,','I",40ç¡'f",.',.:j"
,;,\tl,,~6,;;_,~-¡¡:I:'::~-' :
1,,1' 4':'" ,--(',-"'-}
. .,)" !:;+;:I~~i~ ¡\:'
-.",./"/""."~""",,,, , 'L.'"",~""""".""..,...'I,.,36,., "",
-,-c,-;o,c,--cc," ,., "",' ,,"'1,""")""""
," I~r'--" .,ç-- ..~,-"""""" .......c.'>'- '"
I'" . '"" T~ r'l ..c~"".",,' ". ~;."f ~. ' ",
, ~ l"i I' b.li.I,;(~d;;:'C;U.;,r./J-.;:¡¡
~m"- '(;"" .~ LJ:J¡,,/' /' : ¡.
~ ," I '¿,', ~","';",','""",',',';,~fC,,',,,:".',',",',','.',.,~;"""'",,""'/ "I.~II
..- >< ¡',>;,; ,c ""-,. '. /" I
C) \,' ,.".., // ' ' ...
m ::E: " r"¡ ! ";~~ .. i ~ i
~- ""'" .. ,/ T L
OJ ,""S',","""';"""""'~
- " '::~'.i:~;.."".","",.,..,,"'W"""""","':"'""","
-t ,rt" ",."~..,,, ,--
",'.."",.."".'"
~
--
I
¡
I ¡
, l
,LlST.9i:.Q!ì"'I'iI.NÇlS
~"m ,'-Ill<
»"""", 'co, " l'" l',"." "'.'.'
, . ".w"",.""",.,.;,"""
) - c"," ,'w
,.",.:",: ,.." "'¡"cO."" """"'.,',,"'~"-'" ,p',
.." .""", .""""", """"'.' "",
, . ,.J",.'.., co':w,,".
. ""'c""""""""""""""'"
, """"""" ."", '.. """ ,
"'CO,"""" ""..,'" "',",'. '.. .."..
"",. 'CO" ".." .,',
, "","w,'" 'F'" """" '"
",.", ",""t" ! ,.", ~"",'
"""""",.,,'W"'"
'^'l'",',"'W <;a'" .,-""" "',l" -"",".'" """,~:,',""
"":...,..,, '^", .'.' "M:' 'oct "'"
I -¡-.,;',~~~----l
I II':' Sl~\ I
I "..:':.:.'Ij, \,' ,
U~I, ..' , ""'I
I . I
i"."" /
V~~~~Ã~':'- -~~ ¡
~QKS
, ,.., ",."..""""",.'"
. ,.. '.' ;', ,C; ".."
""""",..'",'",,'.."""""'"
,."".,,0',""'"
","',""CO
"" ,
,'.,'" ,
",', "" "',,",
,"",,"",,"" "..c"..",,'..
, ",._'. "" ,,",..,",'"
"",',"', H.c
,:', . IT!E;S,ISERYIQ:$
QWI'jE;R
O!'vJ;I,PP¡:R
EXHIßIT_L1
PAGt-1-(}r~'
\\\,\~\\\\\~\\\r))
J(,"ß"";'~
E~OINEERIPI,.ANI'JER/LAND SURVI;'(OR ....<C~~"
, "'" ""","""' ", /~,:?fi~',1t\,
,",","'",- ,~",.",","j,.'~t
' ^\(k'.x,:,
.;""yJ
'-"",,~':',,'" ".',
C)
Z ::J
m ~¿
3 ~§
0 r-!-
,... ~
:1 8
-ILCI.,.
,...°t-48
~ ~~
~ U~
« NIL
~ Õ§
¡¡\
!E
~
\ü '"
fß~ ~
::¡CfJ «
0.6"';:
:I: <D g .-
a:~ >-
~~~~
"'ÍCfJ ~
:I: ill
0 0
§ ~
&
, " ,
\ .- ¡,
i,' ,
~ ~ ~, "
¡ ¡ H ~
bi I¡
~'" "..
;:,'f' "JtI"",,
~ t.W~:i
~ ,'"!!~»~ "
¡s.¡,.~ ",../
1m
1 (")
, r--.
~
.
~
/-f
RESOLUTION NO.
02-379
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, APPROVING WITH
CONDITIONS THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ORCHID LANE,
FEDERAL WAY FILE NO. OO-lOO947-00-SU.
WHEREAS, the applicant Harbour Homes by Genereco Inc., applied to the City of Federal Way for
preliminary plat approval to subdivide certain real property known as Orchid Lane and consisting of 15.9
acres into fifty (50) single family residential lots located north and west of the intersection ofSW 344th Street
and 12th Avenue SW; and
WHEREAS, on July 3,2002, an Environmental Mitigated Detennination of Non significance (MDNS)
was issued by the Director of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services pursuant to
the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A), RCW 43.21 C; and
WHEREAS, no appeals on the MDNS were submitted to the Department of Community Development
Services; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner on October 22,2002, held a public hearing
concerning the Orchid Lane preliminary plat; and
WHEREAS, following the conclusion of said hearing, on November 1, 2002, the Federal Way Land
Use Hearing Examiner issued a Report and Recommendation containing findings and conclusions, and
recommending approval of the preliminary plat of Orchid Lane subject to conditions set forth therein; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner on November 7,2002, issued a revision to
condition number five of the November 1,2002, Report and Recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council has jurisdiction and authority pursuant to Section 20-127
of the Federal Way City Code to approve, deny, or modify a preliminary plat and/or its conditions; and
EXH I B IT ---E-~ffiß~N Ai.
PAGE-L-OF ~
File #00-10094 7-00-SU I Doc ID 20921
02-379
Res #
,Pagel
WHEREAS, on November 18, 2002, the City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee
considered the record and the Hearing Examiner recommendation on the Orchid Lane preliminary plat,
pursuant to Chapter 20 of Federal Way City Code, Chapter 58.17 RCW, and all other applicable City codes,
and voted to forward a recommendation for approval of the proposed Orchid Lane preliminary plat to the full
City Council, with the following minor modification to the Hearing Examiner recommendation: "Prior to
final plat approval, the applicant shall either construct four speed humps to city standards or contribute
$8,000.00 to the City for implementation of traffic calming devices to mitigate project impacts"; and
WHEREAS, on December 3,2002, the City Council considered the record and the Hearing Examiner
and Land Use and Transportation Committee recommendations on the Orchid Lane preliminary plat,
pursuant to Chapter 20 of Federal Way City Code, Chapter 58.17 RCW, and all other applicable City codes,
Now THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
S~tion i. Adoption of Find'¡n~of Fact and Conclusions.
1.
The findings of fact and conclusions of the Land Use Hearing Examiner's November 1,
2002, Report and Recommendation, and November 7,2002, revision attached hereto as Exhibits A and B
and incorporated by this reference, are hereby adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Federal Way
City Council, except the third paragraph of Hearing Examiner Finding #21 is deleted and replaced with
Finding #19 of the October 22, 2002, Orchid Lane preliminary plat staff report. Any finding deemed to be a
conclusion, and any conclusion deemed to be a finding, shall be treated as such.
2.
Based on, inter alia, the analysis and conclusions in the Staff Report and Hearing
Examiner's recommendation, and conditions of approval as established therein, the proposed subdivision
makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare, and for such open spaces,
dra¿'1(~e_w8Y7 weets or roads, alleys, other.£,ublic wa~, transit 'V' potable water supplies, sanitary
0 2 - 3 7 _0 I:.XHltSlT
, Resll ,1'áge2 PAGE~OF ~e#OO-IOO947-00-SU/DocID20921
waste, parks and recreation, play grounds, schools and schools grounds, and all other relevant facts as are
required by City code and state law, and provides for sidewalks and other planning features to assure safe
walking conditions for students who walk to and from school.
3.
The public use and interest will be served by the preliminary plat approval granted herein.
Section 2. Application Approval. Based upon the recommendation of the Federal Way Land Use
Hearing Examiner and findings and conclusions contained therein, except as modified herein, as adopted by
the City Council, the preliminary plat of Orchid Lane, Federal Way File No. 00-100947-00-SU, is hereby
approved, subject to conditions as contained in the November 1,2002, Report and Recommendation of the
Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner, November 7, 2002, Hearing Examiner revision to condition
number five (Exhibits A and B), and subject to the following condition: "Prior to final plat approval, the
applicant shall either construct four speed humps to city standards or contribute $8,000.00 to the city for
implementation of traffic calming devices to mitigate project impacts."
Section 3. Conditions of Approval Integral. The conditions of approval of the preliminary plat arc all
integral to each other with respect to the City Council finding that the public use and interest w~1I be served
by the platting or subdivision of the subject property. Should any court having jurisdiction over the subject
matter declare any of the conditions invalid, then, in said event, the proposed preliminary plat approval
granted in this resolution shall be deemed void, and the preliminary plat shall be remanded to the City of
Federal Way Hearing Examiner to review the impacts of the invalidation of any condition or conditions and
conduct such additional proceedings as are necessary to assure that the proposed plat makes appropriate
provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare, and other factors as required by RCW Chapter
58.17 and applicable City ordinances, rules, and regulations, and forward such recommendation to the City
Council for further action.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution should be held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, invalidity or unconstitutionality
EXHIBIT
PAGE-3-°F ~OO-1O0947-00-SU / Doc1D20921
Res A) 2 - ~ 7P'9c 3
shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this
resolution.
Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of the
resolution is hereby ratified and affinned.
Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the
Federal Way City Council.
RESOL VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, THIS ~ DAY
~
,2002.
OF
OF FEDERAL WAY
+ ) I'Þ--- :&;'M ~'"
ã/~~
CITY LERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
ApPROVED AS TO FORM:
r~~~
CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED By THE CITY COUNCIL:
11/n/O?
RESOLUTION No.
12/03/02
02-379
ResJJ 2 - 3 ~a~4
EXHIBIT ---L .
PAGE ~OF ~iI' '00-10094 7-00-SU I ~ ID_'
~
CITYOF ,. ~
Federal Way
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
March is, 2004
Jack Dovey, Chair
Land Use and Transportation Committee .. .
Paul A. Bucich! P.E., Surface Water Manag¿{~
David H. M~~ger
West Branch and Main Stem Lakota Creek Restoration Project - 100%
Design Approval & Authorization to Bid
BACKGROUND:
This project restores approximately 4,630 lineal feet of the west branch and main stem of Lakota
Creek from S. 320th Street downstream to the upstream end of the lakota Wastewater Treatment
Plant. The restoration activities of the project include the following:
.
placement of log structures
placement of streambed gravel
removing fish passage barriers
stabilizing the channel and stream bank
creating an off-channel pool
channel realignment & restoration
revegetation.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Land Use and Transportation Committee approved the 85% design stage of this project on
October 20, 2003. Since then, three property owners have refused to grant easements to the City.
The project is still viable without these properties. However, staff proposes making the following
change to the scope of the project:
Delete the project components on these three properties: Durham, Lowman, Riley.
These parcels are located between the Lower West Branch of Lakota Creek, parallel
to SR 509 between the confluence with the East Branch and the West Branch culvert
crossing of SR 509, and the upstream hairpin turn.
Surface Water Management staff is working on two additional required easements; one from
Lakehaven Utility District and one from SBI Developing, LLc. Both property owners have agreed to
grant the easements to the City at no cost.
Currently the project design is 100% complete and hereby presented for your consideration.
PROJECT FUNDING:
The project is funded as follows:
Design
Year 2004 Construction (estimate)
10% Construction Contingency
Easement
Construction Management (10% of construction)
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS:
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING:
RECOM M EN DATION:
$317,700
$994,394
$99,439
$2,500
$99,938
$1,513,971
$2,079,977
Staff requests that the Committee place the following project recommendations on the April 6, 2004
City Council Consent Agenda:
1.
Approve the 100% design plans and specifications for the West Branch and Main
Stem Lakota Creek Restoration Project;
"'>MI'
2.
Authorize the CIty Manager to execute the negotiated easement from David Dailey
for use of his land for access to the creek as well as installation of in-stream
structures.
3.
Authøfize Surface Water Managem€f\tÐivisionstaff,to bid th€' 3føject .afld fetuffl to
the City Council for permission to award the project to the lowest responsive,
responsiÞlebidder based on available funding.
. "'APPR-OVALOF COMMITTEE REPORT:~;>'e/'~'."",:.
,:,'::.:: "":;:;,C:;;.ii'>::...,:",,
" : : ','::,Yt/, ':
""';'»1;"':: '
,"" ,'..
«" ,
, ,':
Jack D()vey, Chair'
, ,
.~icha~IPark"Me-;nber
FT:kk
cc:
Project Ale
Central File
K:\LUTC\2004\0315 LUTC Lakota Creek Restoration 100% l.doc
',-' :"',,"':"...,
, Eric Faison, Member
~
CITYOF , ~
Federal Way
DATE:
March 15, 2004
FROM:
Jack Dovey, Chair
Land Use and Transportation Committee
Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer ~
David H. M~nager
S 2SStit Street at SR 99 Project - Access Issues
TO:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
Two issues have raised concerns from citizens regarding the SR 99 at S 288th Street project: Access restrictions
to adjacent properties and crosswalk closures acrossthesotlthtegmthe SR"j~and'S 2~street intersection.
PROJECT HISTORY:
This project was added to the Transportation Improvement Program to address both congestion and safety
issues. The intersection of SR 99 and S 288th Street was over capacity and had a high collision rate. The
adjacent intersection to the east,S 288th Street at 18th Avenue S, also had one of the highest collision rates in
the City; the street segment connecting them was a high collision rate corridor.
To address these deficiencies, the project added a second westbound-to-soothbottnd~ft-tumlanefrom S 288th
Street to SR 99, added left-turn lanes on S 288th Street at 18th Avenue S, and added a new traffic signal at 18th
Avenue S. To improve its competitiveness for grant funding, signal interconnect was also added on 5 288th
Street from sR 99 to Military Road 5 and on Military Road S from S Star Lake Road to S 304th Street.
The City obtained a Transportation Improvement Account Grant from the Transportation Improvement Board
and a Hazard Elimination/Safety Grant from Federal Highway Administration in 2001. City Council approved the
30% design stage in March 2002, 85% design stage in August 2002, 100% design stage and authorization to bid
in March 2003, and bid award in May 2003. The project is substantially complete, with only the final overlay of
pavement, associated pavement markings, and minor cleanup remaining.
ACCESS RESTRICTIONS:
The owner of the Redondo Shell gas station on the southeast corner of the intersection of 5 288th Street and SR
99, who apparently purchased the business after the right of way for the project had been purchased,
approached City staff in December 2003 about the possibility of not installing the planned "C-curb" on S 288th
Street. His concern was that most of his business comes from neighborhoods to the east and that he would lose
business if customers could not make a left-turn from S 288th Street westbound into his driveway. Staff met
with him in January, outlining the safety issues driving the decision to install the C-curb, as described below. He
then started a petition, signed by several customers and attracting the attention of the owner of Crestwood
Animal Hospital, which also has access to 5 288th Street immediately east of Redondo Shell.
Staff is sensitive to the issue of economic impacts of access restrictions. Therefore, access restrictions are
carefully considered in the design process of any project. The City adopted access standards in 1998 contained
in Chapter 22, Article XVI, Division 4, based on a State requirement to adopt access management standards for
state highways within the City, as well as a desire by staff to adopt consistent standards citywide.
The City's standards are applied to new development. However, most street improvement projects have not
typically attempted to meet these standards because to do so would frequently involve acquisition of reciprocal
access easements or even construction of new streets to provide alternative access, at greatly increased cost.
Since most midblock collisions involve left turns at driveways, a more cost-effective approach has been to
mitigate the impacts of left-turn restrictions by assuring the ability to accommodate U-turns safely when unduly
circuitous access would result.
As a reference point, City code would allow only one right-in/right-out access on S 288th Street between SR 99
and 18th Avenue S and it would have to be at least 150 feet from either intersection. Under existing conditions,
there are thee driveways on the south side of the street and one on the north side, The driveway at Redondo
Shell is 100 feet from SR 99, Crestwood Animal Hospital's driveway is only 35 feet east of Redondo Shell's, and a
mixed-use development's driveway is 100 feet west of the intersection of 18th Avenue S, CheckMate's driveway
on the north side of S 288th Street is 40 feet east of SR 99. In summary, none of the existing driveways meet
the City's access management standards,
Factors that were considered in the decision to restrict left-turns on this segment of 5 28SthStreetinctude:
.
Existing high collision rates
Significant queuing that would only be partially relieved by the project
The project's creation of an additional westbound lane to cross
Closely spaced driveways
Inadequate corner clearance
.
.
.
.
The Comprehensive Plan has identified 10.00 collisions per million vehicle miles as a high collision rate. The
corridorcolHsioÍl rate on 5 288th'Streetfrom SR 99 to 18th Avenue 5 from 1997 to 1999 was 69.11. The
comparable citywide average for principal arterials is 6,23, the comparable average for 35 mph speed zones is
8.80, and the comparable average for four-lane undivided streets is 8.63.
The intersection collision rate at SR 99 at 5 288tl1 Street was 1.02, and the intersection collision rate at 18tl1
Avenue S at S 288th Street was 2.99, whereas an intersection is considered to have a high intersection collision
rate if the collision rate is over 1.00 in the Comprehensive Plan. The majority of these collisions are congestion-
retated. Particularly relevant tû '5 288tb. Stn~et, many appear to be a result of the extensive queues that
previously developed on 5 288th Street eastbound from SR 99, which frequently extended beyond 18th Avenue S.
(Please see attached collision diagrams.)
Prior to the construction of the project, the 95tl1 percentile queue length on S 288m Street westbound was 647
feet from SR 99. Construction of the project has shortened that to 287 feet, still close to the 18th Avenue S
intersection. Even with the construction of the SR 99 Phase III project, by 2007 this queue is estimated to
extend 383 feet, though the intersection of 18th Avenue 5, but is not forecast to worsen by2020. Nonetheless,
allowing mid-block left turns where significant queuing exists is a significant risk factor.
This risk is compounded by the addition of another westbound lane. Many of the driveway-related collisions
involve the situation wherein a driver in one lane leaves a gap in the queue for a left-turning vehicle to break
through the queue, However, a driver in an adjacent free-flowing lane may not observe the left-turning vehicle
in time to avoid a collision, Similarly, a driver in the free-flowing lane may be able to stop in time, but is rear-
ended by another driver not anticipating the stop. Thus, some rear-end collisions may actually be driveway-
related, but not reported as such. Also, drivers have a more difficult time judging gaps in traffic because of the
additional lane. Finally, closely spaced driveways can be a risk factor because drivers attempting to enter the
street simultaneously from nearby driveways may not be watching each other or correctly anticipating each
other's movernents.
Corner clearance is the distance from an intersection that driveways should not be permitted to use because of
sight distance concerns. Sight distance is calculated using procedures outlined in the American Association of
State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) A Policy on the Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,
Assuming an approach speed of 15 mph (normal for a turning rnovement), the driver of a vehicle turning left into
the Redondo Shell driveway would need to see oncoming traffic 146 feet away from the intersection of their
turning paths. This would be around the corner onto SR 99 in the case of northbound right-turn from SR 99, and
such a vehicle would not be visible due to the gas station sign and the traffic signal controller cabinet. Hence,
this movement could not be executed safely. It should be noted that the project actually brought the corner
closer to the driveway; hence, the same level of risk did not previously exist.
Worse, to leave the Redondo Shell driveway, oncoming traffic from the left would need to be visible from 175
feet away. Oncoming traffic from the west leg of the intersection would be proceeding closer to 25 mph, and
would need to be seen from 292 feet away, which is beyond the crest of the hill west of SR 99, This would also
apply to both the Crestwood Animal Hospital and CheckMate driveways,
Given the cumulative effect of all these factors, the design solution proposed was the installation of Type C curb
on S 288th Street between SR 99 and 18th Avenue S. Staff considered a limited application of C curb to minimize
impacts to these businesses, However, our experience has been that C-curbing should extend at least 50 feet
beyond the extent of the driveway to limit those who attempt to drive around the C-curb. These areas of
influence overlap, thus it became impossible to allow left-turns at one driveway without compromising the
effectiveness of the C-curb at another.
Signs and driveway islands to restrict certain movements have also been proposed in lieu of complete prohibition
of left-turn access, However, the City's experience with these types of measures has been limited at best. For
example, the access restrictions on S 31th Street at the Pavilions Centre driveway did significantly reduce
collision experience, but the remaining collisions reported have all involV€d drivers ignßring the peak hour
restriction. The driveway islands installed on S 320th Street west of SR 99 that were intended to prohibit left
turns out of these driveways are violated regularly, and staff have observed one successful attempt at crossing
all eight lanes of 5 320th Street from the Rite Aid driveway to the Wells Fargo Driveway during midday peak hour,
Finally, these restrictions are not generally enforceable by the police, so there is little disincentive to ignore the
turn restrictions without a non-traversable barrier such as curbing,
The installation of (-curb does not result in unreasonable access. The only case law in Washington State Public
Works staff is aware of found that unreasonable access involved a grain elevator in eastern Washington where
an access restriction to US 395 resulted in seven miles of out-of-direction travel. By comparison, U-turns are
legal at both 18th Avenue S and at SR 99, and can be accomplished by most passenger vehicles, according to
AASHTO guidelines, although at 18th Avenue S it would involve encroaching Into the crosswalk on the north leg of
the intersection, Alternatively, traffic could proceed east on 5 288th street, turn right on 19th Avenue S, right on S
290t~1 Street, right on 18th Avenue S, and left on S 288th Street.
Staff determined that there is no other reasonable means to assure roadway safety on this segment of S 288u,
Street. The access restrictions proposed, although less convenient, are not unreasonable restrictions to access.
Therefore, the C-curb should be completed as currently designed.
CROSSW ALK CLOSURE:
Residents within the project area have also raised concerns that the closure of the crosswalk on the south leg of
the intersection of SR 99 and S 288th Street creates additional out-or-direction travel for pedestrians, some of
whom may be mobility-impaired. Residents are further concerned that additional street crossings may increase
pedestrian exposure to vehicular collisions.
In light of the needs of the mobility-impaired and several Comprehensive Plan policies aimed at making Federal
Way more pedestrian-friendly, staff carefully considers any proposal resulting in the closure of a crosswalk.
However, a variety of circumstances exist that may justify closures.
The overarching goal of the Traffic Division IS to assure the safe and effìcient movement of people and goods on
our transportation system. Efficiency is generally measured by user delay. Failure to provide an efficient
intersection has several effects. These Include societal cost of delay, increased noise, reduced air quality, and
frustrated users that may reduce safety by taking actions to reduce their delay which increases their risk of a
collision.
Further compounding the issue of efficiency is the state's Growth Management Act (GMA), which mandates that
the City must provide adequate roadway capacity to accommodate planned growth. Growth targets are dictated
by King County, However, GMA has no provision to allow the City to manage growth outside the City that
impacts our streets system. Staff estimates that roughly 1/3 of the traffic on SR 99 at S 288th Street is diverted
there by congestion on 1-5. Hence, the burden of maintaining adequate roadway capacity has been shifted to
cities and counties by the state's failure to adequately fund expansion of the freeway system.
It is in this context that the City is confronted with providing adequate roadway capacity at the intersection of
SR 99 and S 288th Street. Because of the unique conditions of this intersection, we are limited to using "split
phasing", which is where all one direction gets a green signal by itself, and then the opposite direction gets a
green signal by itself. This is inherently inefficient, because it would normally require providing timing for two
pedestrian phases across SR 99.
To eliminate the split phasing, the west leg of the intersection would need to be widened in order to align the
lanes on 5 288th Street across SR 99. To accomplish this, the Reinhard Distribution building on the northwest
corner of the intersection would need to be demolished, adding as much as $1,000,000 to the cost of the
project.
In measuring safety impacts, the increased potential for pedestrian collisions by crossing up to three legs of an
intersection rather than one should be weighed against the increased potential for a collision because of
iftcreël5ed congestion. Unfortunately, coHtsion prediction models are not yet sufficiently accurate to determine
which would be safer, so this factor is inconclusive.
Closing a crosswalk, although preferably avoided, is not that unusual. Common features associated with closed
crosswalks include multiple conflicting turning lanes permitted during the pedestrian phase, at T-intersections
where drivers are not looking for conflicts, across freeway ramps, or as here, to improve the efficiency of split
phase intersections. Below is a list of signalized intersections in Federal Way and the immediate vicinity where
cl'Osswalks'have'been dosed, This list does not include'freewayral11ps'where federal policies restrict access at
i ntercha nges.
.
5 272nd St /5 Star Lake Road (owned by City of Kent) - no crosswalk on east leg.
5 277th St / 55th Ave S (owned by King County) - no crosswalks on south leg.
S Star Lake Rd / Military Road S - no crosswalk on north leg.
Pacific Hwy 5/5 Dash Point Rd - no crosswalk on north leg,
S 320th St / Military Road S (owned by King County) - no crosswalk on east leg.
5 320th St / Weyerhaeuser Way 5 - no crosswalk on east leg,
S 320th St / 32nd Ave S - no crosswalk on west leg,
5 320th St / 11th PI S - no crosswalk on west leg.
S 321st St / S Peasley Canyon Rd (owned by King County) - no crosswalk on southeast leg.
Pacific Hwy 5/ 16th Ave S - no crosswalk on southwest leg.
S 352nd St / Enchanted Pkwy S - no crosswalk on north leg.
SW Campus Dr / Winco Dwy - no crosswalk on south leg.
S 356th St / Pacific Hwy S - no crosswalk on north leg,
Enchanted Pkwy S / 19th Wy S (owned by WSDOT) - no crosswalk on the north leg.
Norpoint Wy NE / NE 29th St (owned by City of Tacoma) - no crosswalk on east leg,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Given the impact of maintaining the crosswalk on the south leg of the intersection to the scope and cost of the
project, staff chose to close the crosswalk. The crosswalk could be reopened at a cost of roughly $10,000 for the
addition of pedestrian signals and push buttons and the installation of curb ramps. However, if this crosswalk is
reopened, staff recomrnends that the scope of SR 99 Phase III be increased to include widening the west leg of
the intersection and increasing the budget by $1,000,000 to address level-ot-service impacts.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests that the Committee place the following project recommendations on the April 6, 2004 City Council
Consent Agenda:
1. Changes not to be made in the proposed C-curb design on S 288th Street.
2. The crosswalk on the south leg of the intersection of 5 288th Street and SR 99 remain closed. However, if
the crosswalk is opened, increase the scope and budget of the SR 99 Phase III project to provide an
additional lane on the west leg of the intersection to eliminate split phasing at the intersection.
-
APPROVAL OF COMMIlTEE REPORT(
.. - .-' ...
.,-,' . ..
. ..
-"-----'------"--'-'------------
Jack,Oovey,£hair' '
--'---.----'--------.,---...--. .-- ---'-
, Mi,chael Park, Member
u. '--..- - '-__m '-"--"'--'---
Eñc"fäísoh/Member" .
-~~~.~-- . --.. -~--~.~
cc:
Project Rle
Central File
k:\lutc\2004\99s288 access. doc
Collision Record System
Collision Diagram
City of Federal Way
03-06- 2004
Location: 18 AV 5 at 5288 ST
Report Period: 01/16/1997 to 02/28/2003
t
North
1
H
2
l- ~
I
~ 18 AV S
S 288 ST
lb1
118
32- r =-J 1
2-1 r
8(
~---- 2
~(
») 8(
8
2
2
1
- 1 (---- 3
I
--~
5 7
3 ==-::~~~
3 -----3>euu --)
l'
,
!
~
1
S 288 ST
1
18 AV 5 ~
LEGEND:
Right Angle:
Sideswipe:
-j
~
-=--7
Head On:
- ---'XXó
Approach Turn:
¥<
j
Backing:
Pedestrian/
Bicyclist:
---- -'XJ»>----)
--X) P/B
Rear End:
------'X)---- )
Fixed Object!
Parked Vehicle:
~
Note: HOLLOW CIRCLE: Property Damage Only SOLID CIRCLE: At least one injury collision
SOLID SQUARE: At least one fatality collision.
Collision Record System
Collision Diagram
City of Federal Way
03-06- 2004
Location: S 288 ST at SR 99
Report Period: 01/04/1997 to 02/20/2003
t
North
S 288 ST
2::::-TI~
SR 99 -')-
LEGEND:
Right Angle: -~
1
Sideswipe: ---7!
°-"
Rear End: X). )
2
2 s:~~j 1
1-----1 r-.----- ...-. 7
---- 1
(
--l
3
22
3
3 4
t
BIKE rl
PED
r
i 1
3 1
XX:
~ìè
~ SR 99
I
~---- 1
<E----- -e<E------- 6
t::...:a::::::. 3
2
6
H
Head On:
Approach Turn:
Fixed Object/
Parked Vehicle:
<E-----777-¥ .. -- 2
BIKE8<E- - ---- 3
PED
~
6
S 288 ST
i
24
l
Backing:
Pedestrian/
Bicyclist:
--~
. XJ P/B
Note: HOLLOW CIRCLE: Property Damage Only SOLID CIRCLE: At least one injury collision
SOLID SQUARE: At least one fatality collision.
.
F¡':r'rft""~' .
'. I . 3 . 4 I 5 . -
S. 3 3 T. 2 2 N . R . 4 E. W . M. .. I
CHANNELIZATION LEGEND
f1l TYPE 2L OR 2R ARROW PER WSDOT
~ SID PlAN H-5c (MATERIAL TYPE 4)
[] TYPE 3L ARROW PER WSDOT
SID PlAN H-5C (MATERIAL TYPE 4)
r¡1 CROSS WALK LINES (MATERIAL
~ TYPE 4), SEE DETAlLffi
CHD-1
II] STOP LINE (MATERIAL TYPE 4)
f6l lANE LINE
~ (MATERIAL TYPE 2)
[] PAINTED WHITE EDGE LINE
ŒJ PAINTED WIDE LINE
S 14+20 MATCH TO DRAWING CH-3
S 13+79 (6.0' R1)
BEGIN WJ
S 13+76
BEGIN[!] (6.0' L1)
BEGINIT] (18.0' L1)
BEGIN~ (30.0' L1)
S 13+79.9 32.0' RT
AP~
T 53+84.8
BEGIN0 (6.0' & 17.0' L1)
END@J(6.O'R1)
T 54+04.0 29.0' L T
END~
i i
I
i
I
T 52+49.87 (6.0' L1)
END ~
T 52+35.2 (22.T L 1)
BEGIN ~
'"
'"
~
:E;
T 52+35.4 (180' RT)' ..
8EGIN ~
T 52+53.4 (6.0' R1)
END[!J .
rg1 WIDE LINE PER WSI
~ SID PlAN H-3A (MA
@ PAINTED DOUBLE Y"
IE] YELLOW PAINT ON
f121 WHITE DOTTED EX'
Ô (MATERIAL TYPE 2)
1131 WHITE DROP LANE
L::J (MATERIAL TYPE 2)
IBJ WHITE EDGE STRIF
@ YELLOW EDGE STF
0 NDESIGNATESSIC
T 54+65 (17.0' L 1)
END 0. BEGIN @]
'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'~'-'~~?t::~~l~~'~~~~~:
S 12+59
BEGIN @J(6.0' L 1)
S 12+67
END [!] (6.0' RT & 30.0' R1)
END IT] (18.0' Rl)
!
~
1T I 12"
S 12+20 MATCH TO DRAWING CH-3
0 20 40 60
P"""--- '
Scale In Feet
5.4
T.21N.
R.4E.
W.M.
S. 288TH AT SR99 SIGNN- II INTERSECTK
- IS ON[ tIaI 011
CIIICIIW. -
D "
F NOT ON[ tIaI 011
nos SK:ET. IOJUST
BY IN>VOI sc.ou:s ~Y.
~ FeMderal Way
CHANNELIZATION AND SIG.t
5.4
T.22N,
. CH2MHILL
.... 00C1M:", "., M ..... "., ..""" ",,-...1(0 >€"'... os .. ............ .. "",,,[S9OH'I. """"'." M -... <II .
00,...., He IS "", TO 0( US<;D. ø -.., <II' ø '.of.'" "" 0"'" -..:c' .........T ,>€ -T!(. "",oc"""""" '" 0.,......
klarenls
. 168459t;hOI.dlv
~
I
'"
'"
0:
'"
JHlAA-200J
3
5.33
T.22N.
T 55+80 (17.0' L
END @]
BEGIN IT]
T 55+80
~
" ; rl¡)
T57+39.3 (56.5' L1) . .-.1 ~
~ . J ¡.
END@ ;"-.... r;;:;i:
8
T 57+28.9 (106.5' L 1)
BEGINŒJ
T 57+39.4 (106.5' L1)
BEGIN@
T 57+90
BEGIN[!](6.O'Ll
BEGINIT](18.0' I
T 57+28.8 (56.5' L1)
END ŒJ
;'C~=~=~~~ì'"
\ (;)* III
~,-~-==
/""",
'.
--,-~
'.
?
}J
~
-
-
~
IT-LINE
e ~
-
-
~
T 56+88
END 0(6.0' R1)
END 0(17.0' LT & 17.0' R1)
L "~-.¡ .
I .
._--
I
T 57+40 (62.6" Rl)
END@ !
I
I
en
i
!
h.-------
~
. . -..",...,...-.....,.,..
~
CITY OF ffJ' ~
Federal Way
DATE:
March 15, 2004
FROM:
Jack Dovey, Chair
Land Use and Transportation Committee
Rick Perez, City Traffic EngineerW
David H. Mo+ager
SR 99 at S 333rd Street Median Break
TO:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
The SR 99 HOV Lanes Phase II project reconstructs SR 99 between S 324th Street and S 340th Street to add
HOV lanes, raised medians, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, planter strips, street lights, street trees, and
undergrounded utilities. It also adds a second northbound left-turn lane atS 336th Street, and reconstructs
S 332nd Street and S 330th Street between 15th Avenue Sand SR 99, adding curbs, gutters, sidewalks,
planter strips, street lights, streets trees, and undergrounded utilities.
The project was reviewed at the 30% design stage in May 2001, 85% design stage in June 2002, and 100%
design stage in February 2003. In late 2003 Mr. Kim, a business owner located at the southeast corner of
SR 99 and S 333rd Street, requested a median break to permit southbound left-turns from SR 99 to S 333rd
Street.
In October 2003, staff responded to Mr. Kim by presenting the rationale for using raised medians on this
project. In response, the Committee suggested Mr. Kim provide a study to document the need for the
median break and to also respond to the concerns of City staff; this study was submitted in January 2004.
The study concluded:
. The lack of a left turn lane at S 333rd Street adversely impacts the capacity of the intersection of SR
99 and S 336th Street.
The median break does not interfere with the provision of adequate left turn storage at adjacent
signalized intersections.
No queue is projected that would interfere with the safety of the southbound left turn at S 333rd
Street.
The revision would not be expensive since the median is not yet constructed.
All applicable standards can be met.
Collision history does not indicate that there would be a safety issue.
The median break would reduce traffic impacts to residential areas to the east.
A median break at S 333rd Street would serve more traffic than currently exists at the median break
provided in the SR 99 Phase 1 project, at S 318th Place.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Based on these conclusions, the study recommended allowing the installation of the southbound left-turn
lane at S 333rd Street.
Staff concurs with most of the conclusions with some exceptions, which are outlined as follows:
Impact to S 33(fh Street The study likely overstates the positive impact of allowing the left-turn lane at S
333rd Street. Based on the City's experience on the SR 99 Phase I project, not all left-turns at midblock
locations have become U-turns at downstream left-turn lanes. This suggests that many drivers will reroute
their trips to avoid making U-turns. They may be using parallel side streets or using different arterials to
get to the "right" side of SR 99.
Collision History: Although not expected to result in a significant increase, adding a third lane of opposing
traffic is likely to increase the risk of left-turn collisions. Also, the study cites a gap study which showed that
the number of five-second gaps in opposing traffic is adequate to handle the left-turn volume. However,
per AASHTO procedures for intersection sight distance, a gap of 6.5 seconds is necessary to cross three
opposing lanes. Assuming an even distribution within the 5-mph range in the statistical distribution (which
is not a safe assumption), the number of adequate gaps would be reduced to 118, which is over the
projected volume of 105.
The median break would reduce impacts to the residential neighborhoods to the east: Although desirable,
the Comprehensive Plan anticipates the use of the 20th Avenue S asameans'of providingacœsswherenot
provided by median breaks on SR 99. Furthermore, the study cites the presence of speed humps as
evidence that volumes are excessive on 20th Avenue S, when the ptimarypurpose of speed 'humps is speed
reduction, not volume reduction.
The median break at S 33Id Street would be used by greater volumes than the existing median breaks on
Phase f. First, it should be noted that volumes collected on SR 99 during Phase II are not normal.
Comparison of current count data with data collected in 2003 shows a drop in peak hour volume on SR 99
of approximately 500 vehicles per hour. Similarly, volumes on 20th Avenue S have increased by 200 vehicles
per day.
Secondly, the study '0n~yœns¡deredthis volume comparison during the weekday evening peak hour, and
compares the lowest volume median break on Phase I to S 333rd Street. The highest peak hour volumes on
PhaseJ..are typicalJy.onSaturday. A .comparison of theJeft-turn.volumes. conducted .by.theCity .atthese
locations is as follows:
..
Locatiol1
S 333rd Street
Ross Plaza
S 318th Place
Pavilions Centre
, Weekd~yEvening
.. . Peak Hour Volume
23
71
50
60
.' SatûÎ"#ay Peak
HoUr Volume
21
59
56
120
------
--
Thirdly, the median breaks on Phase I were not solely provided based on existing traffic volumes, but also
are intended to accommodate planned growth in the City Center by serving locations of planned streets in
an area that is planned for high-density development. By comparison, S 333rd Street provides access to
properties zoned multi-family (some of which is still single-family) once east of the commercial strip along
SR 99. Density along S 333rd Street will increase, but not to as large an extent as in the City Center.
Issues that are not addressed in the study include the consequences of providing the median break from a
policy perspective in terms of planning for future street connections, precedent, and right of way
negotiations.
In terms of planning¡ the issue to be considered is whether granting this median break would preclude other
median breaks that the City may deem more appropriate. In this case, S 332nd Street would be precluded
from having a median break, S 332nd Street is shown in the Comprehensive Plan to connect across property
being considered for Federal Way School District's new bus barn, continue along the southern boundary of
Celebration Park, and line up with the planned extension of S 333rd Street being constructed in conjunction
with the new Community Center and to serve the new City Hall. Because of their close proximity to each
other, left-turn lanes for both cannot be designed to meet minimum standards, as shown in the attached
drawing.
Furthermore, a left-turn lane serving S 332nd Street would need to be much longer than the 100 foot
minimum to meet WSDOT standards, as shown in the attachment because of its use by trucks to Ernie's
Truck Stop, delivery trucks to Pacific Coast Ford, and potentially school buses to the bus barn. Note that
whatever design is agreed to, it must be approved by WSDOT. Furthermore, with this level of traffic, it is
likely that this intersection would need to be signalized in order to function safely, which then would
generate queues that would block the intersection of S 333rd Street.
The issue of precedent is merely asking the question of whether this is the way that Council wishes to
consider these requests. Highly related is the issue of right of way negotiations. Staff must negotiate with
each property owner on SR 99 to acquire right of way. Each owner did not wanted to lose left-turn access
but were told that it was necessary.
In the case of Ernie's Truck Stop, possibly the highest generator of trips on Phase II, a study was submitted
to justify left-turn access at S 332nd Street. Staff.determinecHhat.thlsproposaldidnotadequate1y justify
the left-turn access because of the precedence issue and because it could not function safely without a
traffic signal. (Note that the location of the new City Hall, Community Center, and School District bus barn
had not yet been determined.) In lieu of this access, the City committed to construct S<B2nd Street and S
330th Street to improve truck access to Ernie's. To now make an exception after a project has already been
designed and right of way purchased would suggest the City did not bargain in good faith. Furthermore, it
would also set a precedent that will make future right of way negotiations more protracted and expensive.
Therefore, staff recommends that Mr. Kim's request for a median break on SR 99 at S 333rd Street be
denied.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests that the Committee place the following project recommendations on the April 6, 2004 City
Council Consent Agenda:
Deny Mr. Kim's request for a median break on SR 99 at S 333rd Street.
l:itdAPPROVÄL OF.COMMI1TEE;;
}'&~'," . .
cc:
Project File
Central Ale
k:\lutc\2004\99s333 median break l.doc
I
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
1
1
I
,
,
1
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
I
,
t
,
,
1
,
,
I
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
1
I
t
I
,
IVJ
1;0
'ID
lID
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
1
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
I
,
¡~~I
,C>~
'-;'6
, ~
, C>
I m
,
,
,
I
,
~¡
0
,
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
,
I
,
I
,
,
I
,
,
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
1
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
,
~~ :
C>~ 1
jl i
,
I
,
,
1
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
I
I
,
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
1
,
I
,
,
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
I
,
g;:;;,
ZZ"'I
~1~:
$~~ ,
D~ ,
":\1,
,
,
,
,
'\..
00'"
,
t
'1S ONlI:T'S