The URL can be used to link to this page

LUTC PKT 05-17-1999 - I City òfFederal Way City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee May 17, 1999 5:30 pm City Hall Council Chambers MEETING AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3. PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes) 4. COMMISSION COMMENT 5. BUSINESS ITEMS D. S 320th St and Pacific Hwy S Widening and Intersection Improvement Project - 30% Design Approval Information McClung/30 min Action WangllO min Action Perez/IS min Action Miller/IS min Action Millerll 0 min Action Millerll5 min Action Clifton/I 0 min ,A. Wetlands Inventory Update "B. School Impact Fees and Federal Way School District 1998-99 Capital Facilities Plan - C. Proposed 2000-2005 TIP and Arterial Street Improvement Plan E. S 320th Street Underground Conversion Agreement with PSE F. 23rd Ave S (S 317th St to S 324th St) Road Improvements G. Replacement for Planning Commissioner Jim Sempek 6. FUTURE MEETING AGENDA ITEMS SWManagementiDept of Ecology Ordinance & Manual Package Open Cut of ROW vs Boring Endangered Species Act Update RTA Process Northwest Church Channelization Request 7. ADJOURN City Staff: Stephen Clifton, Director, Community Development Services Sandy Lyle, Administrative Assistant 253.661.4116 Committee Members: Phil Watkins, Chair Jeanne Burbidge Mary Gates 1:\ WORKING\MY 17LUT AWPD City of Federal Way City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee May 3, 1999 5:30pm City Hall Council Chambers SUMMARY In attendance: Committee members Phil Watkins (Chair), Jeanne Burbidge and Council Member Linda Kochmar; Director of Community Development Services Stephen Clifton; Public Works Director Cary Roe; Management Services Director Iwen Wang; Deputy Director of Community Development Services Kathy McClung; Deputy Director of Public Works Ken Miller; Assistant City Attorney Bob Sterbank; Senior Planner Margaret Clark; Surface Water Manager Jeff Pratt; Traffic Engineer Rick Perez; Project Engineer Marwan Salloum; Finance Planning Supervisor Tho Kraus; Code Compliance Officers Martin Nordby and Betty Cruz; Administrative Assistant Sandy Lyle. 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 5: 30pm by Chairman Phil Watkins. 2. APPRO V AL OF MINUTES The minutes of the AprilS, 1999, meeting were approved as presented. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT Bob Meyers, President of the North Lake Improvement Club complimented staff for an informative meeting on March 23, 1999. He presented a letter on behalf of the North Lake Improvement Club requesting that a land use management system for the Federal Way area on the east side of Interstate 5 be established to address issues of sewers, density, traffic flow and safety. The Committee stated that such a plan is presently authorized by the Growth Management Act (GMA). 4. COMMISSION COMMENT There was no additional comment from any of the City Commissions. 5. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Draft Resolution to Set Public Hearing Date for the 2000-2005 Transportation Improvement Plan - The Committee m/s/c recommendation to Council to authorize staff to schedule a public hearing for the June 1, 1999, City Council meeting for the review and adoption of the 2000-2005 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) and Arterial Street Improvement Plan (ASIP). The TIP will be presented to the Land Use Committee at the May 17, 1999, meeting. B. Cavital Facilities Plan - The Capital Facilities Plan was presented to the Committee prior to its presentation in Study Session to the Council at the May 18, 1999, meeting. The plan provides a combination of existing and proposed criteria which strive to create a process by which logical decisions can be made in a methodical manner. The CFP is a model that provides a framework to address the ongoing need to invest in and maintain municipal facilities. The projected revenues for capital facilities are based on historical experience with grants and revenues that mayor may not be realized. The motion died for lack of a second. C. Amendments to King County Countywide Planning Policies - The City received a request from King County to review and ratify amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). The purpose would be to bring consistency and to coordinate evaluation and reporting between King County and the City. The Committee m/s/c recommendation of approval to the City Council. D. Sign Code Items for Update Prior to Planning Commission Presentation - The Committee was given an update on Sign Code housekeeping items. They agreed that the Design Guidelines covered the repair of damaged signs. The Committee discussed the most problematic and controversial signs, the temporary variety that advertise a service or civic event, and were pleased that the Planning Commission would be broadening the interpretation of when these signs can be used, with better criteria in the definition and in the numbers of signs. All other questions discussed were forwarded to the Planning Commission at a future meeting. E. Crown Point Storm and Sanitary Sewer Repair/Final Project Acceptance - The Committee m/s/c recommendation of approval to the City Council as complete the Crown Point Storm and Sanitary Sewer Repair Project. Brad Mason Trucking and Excavation, Inc., was the low bidder on the project at $44,309.80. The final construction cost for the project was below the Council authorized expenditure. F. South 336th/SR99 Bid Award - The Committee recommended approval to the City Council at its May 20, 1999, meeting to award the South 336th/SR99 construction bid to R. W. Scott Construction Co., Inc., in the amount of $490,184.70 and to approve a 10% contingency in the amount of $49,184.70; to authorize staff to use $80,681.17 of unallocated bond funds to cover an amount over-budget due to increased cost of hiring construction staff and property acquisition in the right-of-way; and to authorize the City Manger to execute the contract. G. Miscellaneous Traffic Channelization Contract/Final Project Acceptance - The Committee m/s/c recommendation of approval to the City Council at its May 18, 1999, meeting of the Miscellaneous Traffic Channelization Contract completed by Apply-A-Line, inc., in the amount of $32,222.50. 6. FUTURE MEETINGS The next meeting will be held at 5:30pm in City Council Chambers on Monday, May 17, 1999. 7. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 7:00pm. I:\MAY3LUTS.WPD MEMO TO: Federal Way Land Use & Transportation Committee Kathy McClung, Deputy CDS Director ~ FROM: DATE: May 7, 1999 RE: Wetland Inventory Sheldon & Associates have completed the wetland inventory and draft report. At your meeting on May 17th, they will be presenting a summary of the results. I have provided you with the written text of the draft report. In addition to the text, there is a chart with a list of all wetlands, their proposed classification, unique characteristics, code compliance issues, etc. and the field data sheets for all wetlands. All of the wetlands have been digitized and I will have a copy of the city wide map at the meeting. I have asked Sheldon & Associates to do some follow up work on the maps and charts and I anticipate that there may be some additional information they will want to add after initial presentation to the public. However, we do not feel that any additional information will significantly alter the results. All of the parties of record for the sensitive area code amendment have been notified of this meeting. I will have copies of the text available for all interested parties at the meeting and for others upon request after the meeting. Please let me know if you would also like a copy of the charts. -------..----- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DRAFT WETLAND INVENTORY REPORT Prepared for: Kathy McClung Deputy Director, Community Development Services City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, Washington 98003-6221 253/661-4107 Prepared by: II II II II II II Marcia Fischer Sheldon & Associates, Inc. 5031 University Way NE Seattle, WA 98105-4341 206/522-1333 April 12, 1999 ...... TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...........................................................1 PURPOSE """"""""""""""""""""""""""............1 INVENTORY AREA DESCRIPTION .............................................1 METHODOLOGY ...........................................................3 Pre-lnventoryDataCompilation...........................................3 Development of Field Data Forms and Generation of Base Maps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Field Inventory and Mapping .............................................4 , Post-FieldlnventoryDataCompilation .....................................4 " Preparation of Maps, Database, and Report .................................4 PROPOSED WETLAND CATEGORIES ....................:.....................4 Wetland Category .....................................................4 Wetland Buffers......................................... ..............5 RESULTS ""'.............................,..............................5 EntirelnventoryArea...................................................5 FederaIWay(FWAY)Region ............................................6 Unincorporated (UNINC) Region ..........................................6 Unincorporated/Federal Way (UNINC/FWAY) Region. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 REFERENCES """"""""""""""""""""""""""".......8 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Table 1. Distribution of wetlands within each region by size. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Table 2. Distribution of wetlands within each region by proposed rating. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Figure 1 - Wetland Inventory Area With Numbered Basemaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 APPENDIX A - FEDERAL WAY WETLAND INVENTORY DATABASE 1999 APPENDIX B - DATA SHEETS , . City of Federal Way DRAFT Wetland Inventory Report Sheldon & Associates, Inc. April 12, 1999 INTRODUCTION The City of Federal Way is evaluating proposed revisions to the wetland rating method in the City's Critical Areas Ordinance. As part of this process, Sheldon and Associates, Inc. was contracted to inventory the wetlands within both current and proposed jurisdictional boundaries so that the City can make informed decisions about its wetland resources. Wetland inventory information prior to this study was limited to National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Maps, wetland inventory and basin plans from King County, and individual wetland delineations and reports done for projects submitted to the City of Federal Way. Prior to this study a comprehensive field-verified wetland inventory had never been done for the City. All wetlands visited in the field were mapped and classified according to the City's proposed rating system. Information taken for each wetland and summarized in this report includes data on vegetation, soils, hydrology, wetland impacts, and buffer condition. The inventory database and field data forms are included in appendices of the report. The final wetland inventory map is available from the City of Federal Way GIS Department. PURPOSE The purpose of the wetland inventory was to identify and map the general location of the wetlands within the city limits of Federal Way, as well as the unincorporated/potential annexation area to the east of the city. This inventory was conducted to aid City staff and Council members in evaluating proposed revisions to the wetland rating method within Federal Way's Critical Areas Ordinance. General wetland and buffer conditions and characteristics, wetland sizes, and wetland ratings based on the City's proposed rating system are provided in this report. Although all wetlands inventoried were mapped, the inventory process did not include delineation of wetland edges. Only approximate boundaries and locations of wetlands were determined. Any proposed development activities or land use decisions require the completion of a formal wetland delineation and survey to determine the actual location of the wetland edge and the determination of the wetland category based on detailed field data and the jurisdiction's rating system. The inventory is intended to be used as one source of information only, and was not conducted with a level of accuracy to provide detailed information for making final land-use decisions with regard to any specific parcel of land or particular wetland. INVENTORY AREA DESCRIPTION The city of Federal Way is located in southwest King County along the 1-5 corridor between the larger metropolitan cities of Seattle and Tacoma, Washington. The area inventoried included the lands within the city of Federal Way, a largely urbanized region, as well as the unincorporated or proposed annexation area to the east of the city (Figure 1), which includes larger tracts of undeveloped land and numerous large lakes (Dolloff, North, Geneva, Killarney, Five Mile). The two main watersheds in the inventory area are the Hylebos system (East and West Hylebos Creek) predominantly within Federal Way city limits and flowing south to Commencement Bay, and Mill Creek draining most of the the unincorporated area to the northeast and flowing into the lower Green River. The northern portion of the inventory area within city limits drains into Puget Sound mainly via numerous coastal streams. City of Federal Way DRAFT Wetland Inventory Report Sheldon & Associates, Inc. April 12, 1999 METHODOLOGY This section provides an overview of the process undertaken to conduct the field inventory. The information is listed in the same sequence that was used in conducting the inventory. Pre-Inventory Data Compilation The following pre-inventory information was reviewed to identify potential wetland sites in the and to become familiar with the inventory area. Existing available information regarding aquatic resources and both existing and proposed City regulations were also reviewed. Topographic information for the base maps was from City sources for the area within the city limits, and from Sylvan Ascent Inc. for the unincorporated area. . Mill Creek Basin, King County, Washington: Aquatic Resources Restoration Plan, , U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1997. . Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basins - Current and Future Conditions Report, King County Surface Water Management Division,1990. . Executive Proposed Basin Plan - Hylebos Creek and Lower puget Sound, King County Surface Water Management Division, 1991 . U.S. Soil Conservation Service 1973 Soil Survey King County Area, Washington (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1973) . aerial photographs, blueline (City of Federal Way 1992, Scale: 1"=100') . aerial photographs, black and white (DNR, date unknown, Scale: 1 :63,000) . wetland inventory maps (City of Federal Way GIS Department 1998, Scale: 1"=100', sources: City of Federal Way, King County, USFWS National Wetlands Inventory) . Federal Way Storm Drainage Maps (City of Federal Way 1992, Scale: 1 "=400') Development of Field Data Forms and Generation of Base Maps Field inventory forms were designed to collect all desired data during the field inventory. Forms were reviewed by all staff involved in the inventory to ensure consistent data collection and methodology. Information to be collected in the field included: wetland location, Cowardin class, wildlife features, hydrologic connections, human disturbances to the wetland, buffer condition, approximate size, and summary comments describing or characterizing the wetland and buffer. Additional information on the data sheet includes proposed rating, wetland identification number, base map number and 1/4 section-township-range. Other information such as soil type and actual size of the wetland were determined in the office with the soil survey and data from City staff. I Base maps for the field mapping were generated by the City of Federal Way GIS Department. Blueline aerial photos for the area within the city limits were also provided by the City. Black and white aerial photographs from the University of Washington Map Library were used for the unincorporated portions of the inventory area. I I City of Federal Way DRAFT Wetland Inventory Report 3 Sheldon & Associates, Inc. April 12, 1999 I .--~--- I' ,.. II I I III i j II I.. i i _I IIi -¡ ]1: ø: II fI Field Inventory and Mapping All wetlands inventoried were visited in the field between September 1998 and February 1999. Although the majority of the sites were physically accessed, some of the wetlands were only observed and mapped from public roads and right-of-ways, sometimes using binoculars to collect data. In some cases where sites were not accessible or visible, or were too large to practically map on foot, aerial photos were used to collect some of the information. Wetlands were mapped on base maps provided by the City. Each mapped wetland was numbered on the base map with a hyphenated prefix corresponding to its location by section- township-range, e.g. wetland 52 was given the number 1-21-3-52. Each wetland mapped had a data sheet associated with it. Wetlands smaller than 500 square feet were not inventoried. , Post-Field Inventory Data Compilation All base maps were checked against data sheets to make sure that there was a completed data sheet for each mapped wetland, and that no wetland numbers had been duplicated. In addition, the office portion of the data sheets was completed including soil type, and more accurate size estimates. Base maps were then delivered to city GIS staff for digitizing. Preparation of Maps, Database, and Report City GIS staff digitized all hand-drawn base map information, and created a database of all the inventoried wetlands and their sizes. That information was added to the main database that was created by Sheldon and Associates in the interim. The database was organized so that the two regions inventoried (Federal Way and the unincorporated area) are separate. A third region that contains wetlands that cross the boundaries of the City and the unincorpòrated area is also differentiated. Within each region, wetlands are sorted by section-township-range. Summary information for the entire inventoried area was also compiled. A final written report summarizes the findings of the inventory. The final completed base map is not included in this report due to its illegibility at such a reduced scale. It is available from the City of Federal Way GIS Department. PROPOSED WETLAND CATEGORIES Wetland Category The following proposed wetland rating system for Federal Way was used to rate the inventoried wetlands: Category I wetlands are greater than 2,500 square feet in area and meet one of the following criteria: a. contain the presence of species or documented habitat recognized by state or federal agencies as endangered, threatened or potentially extirpated plant, fish or animal species; or b. contain the presence of plant associations of infrequent occurrence, irreplaceable ecological functions, or exceptional local significance including to but not limited to estuarine systems, peat bogs and fens, mature forested wetlands, groundwater exchange areas, siginificant habitat or unique educational sites; or City of Federal Way DRAFT Wetland Inventory Report Sheldon & Associates, Inc. April 12, 1999 4 ~t c. have three or more wetland classes one of which is open water. Category" wetlands are greater than 2,500 square feet in area, do not exhibit the characteristics of Category" wetlands, and meet one of the following criteria: a. are contiguous with water bodies or tributaries to water bodies which under normal circumstances contain or support a fish population, including streams where flow is intermittent; or b. are greater than one acre in size in its entirety; or c. are less than or equal to one acre in size in its entirety and have two or more wetland classes, with neither class dominated by non-native invasive species Category III wetlands are greater than 2,500 square feet in area and do not exhibit those charaCteristics of Category I or II wetlands. Wetland Buffers Category I wetlands: 200 feet Category II wetlands: 100 feet Category III wetlands: 50 feet for wetlands greater than 10,000 square feet in area, and 25 feet for wetlands that are between 2,500 and 10,000 square feet in area RESULTS This section provides a summary and brief discussion of the wetlands identified by the inventory. Tables 1 and 2 below, summarize the inventory data in Appendix A. Entire Inventory Area A total of 220 wetlands were inventoried - 159 were located within the city limits, 54 were in the unincorporated area, and 7 wetlands had portions within both of these regions. More than half of the wetlands inventoried are less than one acre in size, and over 80% of the wetlands inventoried are less than 5 acres in size. Almost half of the wetlands inventoried are Category II wetlands, and 85% of the wetlands are either in Category II or III. However, in terms of acreage, Category II and III wetlands only comprise 36% of the 1025.21 acres of wetland inventoried. The representation of Category I, II, and III wetlands is fairly consistent with regard to acreage between the two major inventoried regions (FWAY, UNINC). The high percentage (95%) of Category I wetland acreage in the region of overlap (UNINC/FWAY) is somewhat skewed simply because there are three large wetlands that lie mostly within the unincorporated area, but have small portions that are within city limits. If these three wetlands were grouped with the other wetlands in the UNINC region, the acreage of Category I wetlands in the UNINC region would jump from 63% to approximately 75% of inventoried wetlands there. Of the twenty-six Category I wetlands inventoried, fifteen are located within Federal Way City limits. These fifteen wetlands comprise 50% of the total Category I wetland acreage in the entire inventory area. City of Federal Way DRAFT Wetland Inventory Report 5 Sheldon & Associates, Inc. April 12, 1999 --_.~ Federal Way (FWA Y) Region A total of 159 wetlands were inventoried within Federal Way City limits. Sixty percent of the wetlands are less than 1 acre in size, and only 8% of them are larger than 10 acres. A total of 87% of the wetlands are either Category II or III wetlands, which represent 44% of the total wetland acreage inventoried in this region. Fifteen out of the twenty-six Category I wetlands inventoried were within Federal Way City limits; 70% of the Category II wetlands were within City limits; and 77% of the Category III wetlands were found within City limits. The wetlands in this region are mainly associated with West Hylebos Creek to the south, lakota Creek in the central part of the region, and Joe's Creek to the northwest. Unincorporated (UNINC) Region A total of 54 wetlands were inventoried within the unincorporated or proposed annexation area east bf Federal Way. Forty-six percent of the wetlands are less than 1 acre in size, and 15% of them are larger than 10 acres. A total of 65% of the wetlands are either Category II or III wetlands, which represent 37% of the total wetland acreage inventoried in this region. Seven out of the twenty-six Category I wetlands in the entire inventory area were in the unincorporated area; 28% and 22% of Catgeory II and III wetlands respectively were in the UNINC region. In general, the unincorporated area has a greater proportion, both in number and total acreage, of larger, higher quality wetlands, than the FWAY region. The wetlands in the UNINC region are primarily associated with Mill Creek to the east and East Hylebos Creek to the south, except the area north of 300th S1. and Dolloff lake where streams drain into Mullen Slough and the Green River. Unincorporated/Federal Way (UNINC/FWAY) Region A total of 7 wetlands are located such that they overlap jurisdictional boundaries, with portions of each wetland lying within the city limits, and portions outside of the boundary. Ninety-five percent of the wetland acreage in this region is Category I wetland, and most of it is actually located outside of the Federal Way city limits. Three out of these seven wetlands are greater than 10 acres in size. Functionally, the wetlands in this region are essentially in the unincorporated area, but they do cross jurisdictional boundaries. Table 1. Distribution of wetlands within each region by size FWAY 96 60% 40 25% 11 7% 12 8% UNINC 25 46% 18 33% 3 6% 8 15% UNINC 14% 2 29% 14% 3 43% FWAyl 159 54 7 ENTIRE 122 56% 60 27% 15 7% 23 10% INVENTORY AREA 1 Wetlands in this "region" lie within both the unincorporated area and Federal Way city limits 220 City of Federal Way DRAFT Wetland Inventory Report 6 Sheldon & Associates, Inc. April 12, 1999 I ... I -- 11 . . i Table 2. Distribution of wetlands within each region by proposed rating , ' ,',"'.".".',"",~ ',:' """""'i'.';"~¡~~'Kt.\i";;"i '~~;qi!l""'!""'Î:; ' """"":""""", ':"""'1,:.-:;" 8rBfÂL ' , , ",' . REG,I~N:):(:: \: PROP0SED:'::,. lil~BER ;f~ ;-:akOF:TO:rALI'~ 'Slzé:,'::' ,SIZE '.. :"".' ':'."':"""1~'.,;¡f¡ ..,'.... "N' . ""'::Fffr~ . :~';:Wl¡RÄ¥iÑ~~;~~ 'Wi",,;:., 'REA\! ::" ),:: (ACRES) ',',,', : '. I!~",., "":""WLHWt,;,.1:, (~9.:"...: ..,,).¡- ,- :.:~::::;:~..t~i:t~:~~¡~~~J ' "".."",.,' 1::;':jW~.~çil&~Q:~::~i"~ ':~""~:"'I ," .. ',h.,...;1,~I:"'!IF;'::' ":.:r,"~'"". ß.,J,LL:,::: ': :~'::~'~<t .~ " " ,,:~,r.;.:.;~j,;,..:r,¡;¡,:,;:: , FWAY I 15 9% 56% 14,394,200 330.45 II 71 45% 41% 10,436,500 239.59 III 66 42% 3% 888,700 20.40 not regulated! 7 4% <0.5% 12,200 0.28 Totals 159 25,731,600 590.72 UNINC I 7 13% 63% 7,688,400 176.50 II 28 52% 34% 4,159,600 95.49 III 19 35% 3% 314,400 7.22 Totals 54 12,162,400 279.21 UNINC2 I 4 57% 95% 6,454,200 148.17 FWAY II 2 29% 4% 269,900 6.20 "' 1 14% 1% 39,700 0.91 Totals 7 6,763,800 155.28 ENTIRE I 26 12% 64% 28,536,800 655.12 INVENTORY AREA II 101 46% 33% 14,866,000 341 .28 III 86 39% 3% 1,242,800 28.53 not regulated' 7 3% <0.5% 12,200 0.28 Totals 220 44,657,800 1025.21 , Wetlands that were inventoried, but are not regulated by Federal Way code due to size 2 Wetlands in this "region" lie within both the unincorporated area and Federal Way city limits City of Federal Way DRAFT Wetland Inventory Report Sheldon & Associates, Inc, , April 12, 1999 7 I - ~ I I i t ~ I I I I I I I I I I I REFERENCES Federal Way. 1992. Aerial photographs, blueline. 1"=100'. Federal Way. 1992. Federal Way Storm Drainage Maps. City of Federal Way. Federal Way. 1998. Wetland inventory maps. City of Federal Way GIS Department. 1"=100'. King County. 1990. Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basins - Current and Future Conditions Report. King County Surface Water Management Division, King County, Washington. King County. 1991. Executive Proposed Basin Plan - Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound. King County Surface Water Management Division, King County, Washington. '. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1997. Mill Creek Basin, King County, Washington: Aquatic. Resources Restoration Plan. u.S. Department of Agriculture. 1973. U.S. Soil Conservation Service. Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington Washington Department of Natural Resources. Undated. Black and white aerial photos. 1 :63,000. Olympia, Washington. City of Federal Way DRAFT Wetland Inventory Report 8 Sheldon & Associates, Inc. April 12, 1999 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Date: To: Subject: May 13, 1999 Federal Way City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee Iwen Wang, Management Services Director "'}.l ~ 1998/99 Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan From: Attached is a copy of the Federal Way School District (the District) 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan (the Plan) for your review. The plan has been reviewed and approved by the Board of Education in April, and is now being reviewed by all cities in the District boundary and King County. If approved by City Council, the fee will be effective January 1,2000. The impact fees based on the Plan will be $2,384 per new single family dwelling unit and $804 for each new multi-family dwelling unit. This is a reduction of $498 (17%) and $80 (8%) respectively from the current rates of $.1,882 and $874. The lower fees are primarily attributable to the District's higher reliance on temporary facilities (portables), and the proposed change in grade configuration in 2003/04 school year. The District increased the number of temporary facilities from a total of 79 portable facilities to 90, with the percentage of pupils housed in portable facilities increased from 2.66% to 3.05%. Since the unit cost of temporary facility is lower, the more portable facilities in proportion to the permanent facilities the lower the impact fees. The proposed reconfiguration of the grade structure will change the current K6/3/3 to K5/3/4 (number of years in elementary/middle/high schools respectively). This change reduces the demand on elementary school facilities, which is heavily weighted (41 %) in new development contribution and the impact fee calculation. Instead, this change will shift future facility demands and costs to middle and high school constructions and expansions, where a smaller portion (16% for middle school and 11 % for high school) of the costs can be allocated to new developments based on the student generation factors 1. District staff and myself will be at the May 17 Committee meeting to answer any questions you may have. Please do not hesitate to call me should you have any questions or need additional information prior to the meeting. I The Student Generation Factor is determined by the number of students, by the level of school they are in, generated by new development projects through sampling of large new subdivision activities in the District boundary within the past 5 years. K:\FlNANCE\*\99CYMEMO ~ ~/ FED EAAL ~ WAY .:v-- PUBLIC SCHOOLS April 29, 1999 Iwen Wang City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way S Federal Way W A 98003 Dear Iwen; Enclosed are tive copies of the Fcderal Way School District 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan. This plan was adopted April 26, 1999 by the Fcderal Way School District Board of Directors. We will produce and transmit final hound copies of the plan after all jurisdictional reviews are complete. The report of expenditures from the City of.Federal Way Impact Fee Account is also enclosed. If you have any questions please call me at (253) 945-2071. Sinœrely, £4 '. I ./' Q;~J e<~_ù {¿id~ Geri Walker MIS Speciali3t C lody Putman, Director of Business Services Phone (253) 945-2000 . 31405 18th Avenue South. Federal Way, WA 98003-5433 . www.fwsd.wednet.edu FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS IMPACT FEE EXPENDITURE REPORT PERIOD 1-1-98 THRU 12-31-98 Type of Financing Date Warrant Number Vendor Expenditure Plan Project June 4, 1998 17912 K.C.D.A. Purchase Portables (3) Saghalie and Lakeland Amount $118,393.24 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC' SCHOOLS 1998 -99 CAPIT AL FACILITIES PLAN Building for. the 21st Century I ~ FEDERAL' WAY .;v-- PUBLIC SCHOOLS Every Student... World Class Skills FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Linda Hendrickson Holly Isaman Joel Marks Ann Murphy Jim Storvick SUPERINTENDENT Thomas J. Vander Ark FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION I SECTION II SECTION III SECTION IV TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................ IN"TRODUCTION.................................................. THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction............................................................. Inventory of Educational Facilities............................. Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities.................... Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities.......................... Needs Forecast - New Facilities.............................. Six Year Finance Plan.............................................. MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction............................................................. Map - Elementary Boundaries.................... Map - Junior High Boundaries.................... Map - Senior High Boundaries................... SUPPORT DOCUMENT A TION Introduction............................................................. Building Capacities................................................... Portable Locations................................................... Student Forecast...................................................... Capacity Summaries............ ....... .................. ............ King County Impact Fee Calculations....................... SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1997/98 PLAN ii 11 l11-V 1-1 1-2 1-3 1-4 1-5 1-6 II-I 11-2 11-3 11-4 Ill-I Ill-2 Ill-4 Ill-6 Ill-8 Ill-13 IV-I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective March 1996, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan as of April 1999 This Plan has been adopted by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Auburn and City of Des Moines have not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Aæa Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. Additional plans will be consistent with the six year Capital Facilities Plan. At this time, Federal Way Public Schools is evaluating the need for and possible timing of future bonds. iii FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION (continued) In October of 1997 the District convened a Study and Survey Committee. The Committee was made up of patrons, parents, professional consultants, school staff and central administration staff. The charge of the Committee was divided into four focus areas on a continuum, which lead to recommendations to the Board of Education. The four focus committees were: 1. Educational Plan Committee 2. Special Education Committee 3. Classroom Standards and Facility Use Committee 4. Future Alternative Committee Two recommendations were sent forward to the Board of Education from this committee. The first recommendation was to move to a Pre K-5 elementary, 6-8 middle school, and 9-12 high school grade configuration beginning in the fall of 2002 or as additional high school space allows. The Board of Education approved this recommendation at the October 12, 1998 regular Board Meeting. This grade configuration is believed to be more responsive to student needs. It will allow for smaller elementary enrollments with room for lower primary class sizes. The middle school allows two-year preparation for the W A State ih grade test, matches the Federal Way Public Schools 8th grade gateway test, and matches most western Washington districts. Middle schools are also thought to be a better way to address the needs of adolescents in a period of transition from elementary 0 high school. The four-year high school plan combines the 9-12 graduation credit system, allows two-year preparation from the 10th grade test, and physically places the high school students together. The second recommendation brought forward from the committee to the Board of Education was a bond proposal. Federal Way Public Schools must meet the needs of a growing student and community population. The District must be flexible with buildings, programs and staffing to meet the needs of the 21 st Century, while being financially responsible and sensitive to the current tax rates. A flexible, cost effective and educationally beneficial approach that integrates academics and high tech/high skill preparation is needed. By extending the existing debt and creatively using new and existing facilities, the District can meet these complex needs with no increase in local tax rates. The bond proposal of $83 million was arrived at after receiving input from parents, staff and the community. Member of the Citizens for Federal Way Schools and senior staff members met with school staff and PTSA groups. This process concluded with two daylong meetings among a group of faculty members. Based upon infonnation the District received, it became apparent that people wanted a comprehensive high school ($44 million); a middle school ($17 million); expansion and improvement of existing schools ($9 million); replace Truman High School ($6 million) and other general improvements ($7 million). Additional planned improvements included in the bond proposal are: parking and pedestrian safety, playgrounds iv FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN and sports fields, new classroom start-up and music equipment, information systems and networks and emergency communications. The Board of Education unanimously approved this bond recommendation at the February 8, 1999 regular Board Meeting. This proposal will be submitted for voter approval on May 18, 1999. Federal Way Public Schools opened the Internet Academy in the 1996/97 school year. This program currently serves approximately 615 students, 375 are full time students. Internet Academy has grown from about 60 students to the current 615 in less than two years. The forecast for growth in this program is to serve approximately 1400 full time students by the year 2004. Internet Academy is currently operating out of leased space consisting of administrative areas and a computer lab area. Additionally, some lab sections are scheduled in the current high school facilities during non-school hours. There is an anticipated need of approximately 2000 square feet of additional space over the next two years. This capacity is not included in the analysis of instructional spaces. The facility needs are unique to a program of "distance learners" . The Marketing Academy is also operating out of leased space. This program serves approximately 60 students. Capacity needs for Marketing Academy have not been addressed in the analysis of instructional space. Federal Way Public Academy will open in the 1999/00 school year in six portables on the Illahee Junior High site. This school will serve 120 seventh and eight grade students. v SECTION I THE CAPITAL F ACILITES PLAN ... ~~~..:. . . ::"\ ~ ,"~' ~ :~;;;.~"~ \\\\ .: ." I~ I ':II~' ~ ::=:. l ... ::::'::: S. ~ ~ ::::: t t .' "Iit~ \- . ',:å , ::; ',- .:¡ . -::'- . . ... . .. :11' '! . !II , : FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. 1. This section provides information about CUlTent facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. This is followed by a Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and update modernization needs listed. I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Ayenue SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Ayenue SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lake Groye 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35675 32nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th Street Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314th Street Federal Way 98003 Nautilus 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th Street Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Silyer Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd A yenue S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Ayenue S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003 Woodmont 26454 16th Ayenue S. Des Moines 98198 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy (99/00) 36001 1 sl Aye S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 33914 19th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Totem 26630 40th Avenue S Kent 98032 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Harry S Truman High School 31455 28th Aye S Federal Way 98003 LEASED SPACE Internet Academy 32020 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Marketing Academy 1928 S Sea Tac Mall Federal Way 98003 1-2 91 23 35 40 63 71 72 84 96 Site # FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Administrative Building 31405 18th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 MOT Site 1O66S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 Central Kitchen 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Leased Space Community Resource Center 1928 S Sea Tac Mall Federal Way 98003 Security Offices 30819 14th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Location 27th A venue SW & Dash Point Road SW 360th Street & 3rd A venue SW S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S E of 10th Avenue SW Between SW 334th & SW 335th Streets E of 47th Avenue SW & SW 314th Place S 344th Street & 46th A venue S 36600 block of Pacific Highway S 3737 S 360th Street S 308th Street & 14th Avenue S Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 1 There is a pending sale on this property. 1-3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Truman High School Modernization with expansion (1) Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity (1) Portables Decatur High School, E~deral Expansion (1) Way High School and Thomas Jefferson High School Various School Sites Parking Safety; Network (2) Upgrades; Automated Libraries; Elementary Playgrounds; High School Sports Fields; Emergency Communications. I Notes: (1) Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues or non-voted debt issues. Anticipated source of funds is future bond issues. (2) 1-4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES NEW FA CILITY LOCA TION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS MOT Site (1) Unknown N/A Senior High School Site Unknown (2) New Senior High School Unknown (2) New Middle School Site 84 (2) S 360th St at 38th Ave S S Notes: (1) Construction of Maintenance, Operations and Transportation (MOT) site is dependent on sale of current MOT site. (2) Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues or non-voted debt issues. I-S FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Six Year Finance Plan Secured Funding Sources 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Total Revenue Impact Fees (1) $1,000,000 $60,764 $1,060,764 Land Sale Funds (2) $1,000,000 $2,500,000 $1,050,152 $4,550,152 State Match Funds (3) $832,166 $44,302 $876,468 TOTAL $1,832,166 $3,544,302 $1,110,916 $0 $0 $0 $6,487,384 TOTAL $7,000,000 $83,000,000 $800,000 $1,500,000 $92,300,000 NEW SCHOOLS 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Total Cost New Middle School $2,000,000 $12,000,000 $3,000,000 $17,000,000 New Senior High School $5,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $500,000 $40,500,000 New Senior High School Site $1,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,500,000 MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSION Truman Senior High (Alternative) $3,500,000 $2,500,000 $6,000,000 Expansion Three High Schools $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $7,500,000 Expansion Elernentary Schools $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000 TEMPORARY FACILITIES Portables (8) $276,805 $276,805 OTHER Safety Improvements (9a) $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $3,000,000 School Improvements (9b) $500,000 $2,000,000 $1,600,000 $200,000 $200,000 $4,500,000 Facilities Department $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 Library System Improvements $650,000 $650,000 $1,300,000 MIS System Project $600,000 $100,000 $700,000 TOTAL $1,500,000 $6,250,000 $19,500,000 $39,850,000 SI8,950,000 $1,226,805 $87,276,805 NOTES: 1. These fees are cWTClltly being held in a King County, City of Federal Way and City of Kent impact fee account, and will be available for use by the District for system improvcmenb. 2. These funds come from various sales of land and are set aside for estimated expenditures. 3, Guaranteed state match reimbuncmenb. 4. These funds, if secured, will be used for future projecb. S. These are projected fees based upon known residential dcvelopmenb in the District over the next six years. 6. These funds are projected state matching funds. 7. These funds are projected land sale income. 8. These fees represent the cost of moving and siting existing portables, The District may choose to purchase new portables in the years shown. This estimate may also include the cost of purchasing these portables. 9a. These projects have been approved by the Board of Directors and cover most schools, These projecb do not increase capacity. These projects inlcude parking and pedestrian safety improvements at IS elementary schools, 9b. Thcac projects have been approved by the Board of Directon and cover most schools. These projecb do not increase capacity. Thcac projects include: school networks, infonnation and library sustems; new classroom start up; elementary playgrounds and high school sports fields; music equipment; emergency communication. 1-6 SECTION II MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION n - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-6), six junior high schools (grades 7-9), three senior high schools (grades 10-12) and two alternative schools (grades 7-12) for the 1998/99 school year. On April 20, 1996 the Federal Way Public Schools Board of Education adopted the boundaries for these schools, The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school for each grade level (the alternative schools, Harry S. Truman High School and Merit School, serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or aåoption of programs which affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can b~ built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding fàcilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. II-I ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES E F -- .-- G J H E::~~:~:V SCHOO~:::::~ 210 'j,;~i9~i~i Ð,n )F1 ' ':.~ ",. ,,- "." ", .Jft~) ~ Code--. C0d8--. .;,.,.'1.1 j. ~i\ W1t 'j"y~7:' .'.tI ; 10 Adelaide C-6 64 lUahee E-9 j jJ ~~~ ~ j ~ ;¡: ~J'~ ) 16 Brigadoon B-6 66 Kilo G-6 2. ,,' ii',:J.II' ãJ, ::=":F..,;;...,._.fi! ~ -.. ~'ß )).'~.e:: 2 28 Camelot G-5 62 Lakota D-6 :~ ~,,: ,~":('1P:I,~'1J I' " ""...:; '22 Enterprise D.9 61 Sacajawea E-5 Ht:::: ""~;'" -~\JI!'" "<1'1 ¡ : ..~.. .. , 14 Green Gables A-7 70 Saghalie C-6 0;, . ,'" .~: ' " , ' : 30 Lake Dolloff G-6 65 Totem G-3 7.X'sotiw. "...' ; .:... :~ ~,~: ~ lit.' ",:',::' : ~¡, L- ~~ t:~:I:nr:ve~:: 8 Merit F-6 - ,,~': p~~ ~:. ~lli ¡Un¡! ::, I, 2 Mark Twain F-4 ~~:::' ~~.--",$j -:.~" '~ ;ii 29 Meredith Hili H-5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 3 ¡ -::~,; '" ,II' -0,. ~,..,y....,. j :.1; ~ 3 6 Mirror Lake E-6 ! "'4 ?,;v; - ~ ¡jiL '" Ii.""'" ,:0 Ii 5 Nautilus E-5 Code--. : ~,...,. ~5jJ . Ii 15 Olympic VIew C-7 ~. '-:1 . d 0 ~ 21 Panther Lake E-6 80 Decatur C-6 . ,- ;;-' ¡:.¿,-' , ~ 37 RainlerView F-10 81' FederalWay E-5 n' ,j . ,J ¡ ;!I,,~ .,,~,: ~ 41 s~erwood Forest D-6 83 Thomas Jefferson G-4 '--.... WOODMOH' tJ¡' ¡ ,;n1 ' "Æ '172"::~.' "'"' ¡r.¡ " , ! j'Jikt' ~ ~- 24 Solver Lake D-7 8 Harry S, Truman F-6 "A<H, '[~. f:. " . .. . "IlL', ¡I:~,! !I'III~ § 26 Star Lake G-3 8 Merit F-6 ,'j. ':"i";~~II&>:::'o,","~"-",,, , 25 Sunnycrest G-2 ~;. "",." ,...!..' 0 ;;;¡;Z1¡..r ,f m ""- ~ 7 Wildwood F-5 Surplus Sites --- 'I ~ ,::...:. '.oiI Ii ; ..., ¡, ¡ "':"", : 1 Woodmont F-3 .,.. . "\J "";, I' , " ~ ; 100 EducationalServlceCenter F-6 ,.,< :',.¡ - ':~:, ,~' ::-:::"'t¡ 286 : 99 S --. '5fi .\~ . I " ,.,.. .. ' , "~4'NG r-v ,) Future upport Services E-6 -- Code-- - '~.>. .. ~," . -, u. <om. HII 97 Malntenance-operations'Tran.portation~-6 ~.., ' , O~' . "to]'.' ,. "," t !! D pO"., ...'.'... .,,';' ,. '01. 8JI. ; 11, .oo' ¡ .. ~ , m.I' , Parks- ,.~'oo::..¥'~"",-~" .~.. ,,"~.'. 5 ,"f~~":,,'~_:*';~ .,":::-::::: 11 "',:... -,'¡I~ . ,"NO ,::~j'~'I~~"J""o'~6"'~-: "":~"'" '.,.",'-:..,;. .,' '-. '. ", iI'~- Sa ~<","~ f.~" d .' , ',"" _:,!","" ~' ., .....~- po"" ",~':""-_.; ,..:-', .,L " ,~"",.." ..-.,""'" ,~., ~,," --- . :w C-"~-";. -ml;L.- "r;:;;fåa 'alaI .,' :;I;¡~ ~ 81 .:¡~~ ~~¡. ! IJ ,""'~,!~Øk! ' I ...~,-~::~~; ,~!'ì~~~~\" .~"'~,;..;~~'~~:.~.:.:~ ,".", .¡;~.~~~' ~ .. ::i1:-:~~~ ~~> ~ ;'-:~" ~ .'~;'.'.F"~'~._:~ ,.- 6 ",.-' ..r.'1!í<~,:',;,~":;..," -;,~,-;,';J_: .,.":'" ,,' . '.', , .""" '"..,..,:'~'i ::;.;i! ¿- !""'-,;: /J",~-"'¡¡"""W.'~ml~3:)::,<,,:.., ,~" """":;1""r...;I¡",;¡ . "',,~ ,"" '." "'0'" ,.,~,,""""",.. '"""'. '. -~...;". . ':. IT.:.:~' f';'"" \~"-;::i~ ~- "'"-"~"".;; N'.";~:,:~"", "~~"';~'.9ì;~':[;~=;""¡' .;~.~ 'i ". "~,,,"""-...,.. I,... .., .:'!j] ""'~"I¡..". """ ",..,., d' ,! .. ":. ~'" ÌI .:"" ,-, ,,~.. "'0",' ì! ~~;~~~:;:~ ~~:.' ..:, ..'" ~"?"~iY7ji~ ':; I t' , ..,~;,~;) '4:; ~>1" "'.:"-~ .' ,:;~ ¡J \\. I i -:!f~-f. / A 7 ~'I,.,~::'~ ,~' :~.~" ~ ,"" ,,' ,~'".~:?"" ~'~ffi rl :e:-\"::¡'Q~'~\~\.,:: 'l"ii --~ ..;. '.';.~:\\~'~ ..;~o ""'~'[~.~": ' .-"';;~, 'Jr;'<:~';;' \11...." ,......,r 7 . "<~.. "';¡ç' "'j':) < "~^ ,-, < ",,;,," /; ,fF':C. ' .-~ ' r'~' ': m:,: .w~....:::~.è~~:~. :,,~""ýjf. \.. :!:~ ~.. "~'l~/~":T v.,o" t ~ :1-" ~ ~B "..",< ";I)"" 'w::,:,...,~::"",~p;~: ., ¡""'~"ò':. ."_<O.'.~"'i ¡ N . '" .w" Com..' ,,' ,... '9);.."""".!i ' ,," . "'~ " 'i. ¡ -. . ':" '." -, , ",.; ,..~1;~'~::"~ ~i J ; 1 H::::::';'~~: P':". ;~,~¡¡~.; !: :. ~ 8--- 00> ' " !'" >: '-,... '\....Jrl.", ~.s, ,-,," ~ ,.H/t ,8 W ~ E : :-.;>, ~. ~:~~j' .:. ~ ~ ~I ¡ ~; I / . :A:"..~.' ;'./, "!~~. \.- ~ ~. '!~ .; .' :,:.! 1--"~ : i";:"- '\ ';lJ~~"'i'}~~ "', I~:. ~ s '! 2 . = ~.; ""'- .: -'~ II~." ./'" ñ- ~"u. ,-'M'.. . :po I+- ",-,,",""""""'.- ".":m ¡:,,¡~~ .~. . ,,"'- ~ : ".ii,. coo... j..j~ '~r!>;:: £/tv, 1, ,Tïf-..~ '." .r'¡¡ : """":.':""..::'- . , w...:..' " ~. ";'0- -'~' ,,' ,,~~.. " :f ..."..." 31 "".WA_' ~;I;IIiI¡I~I~ O!~~. ~!I ~ ~ ~ ,~', <' f~' "::11»-"""1 I _.,- ~' ""'.~~~~J";' ""'" ,"'.'; <';1" '9 -,...,..-- ~ "~,."," "~ -:; ~' '.~ """19 I --.- ¡;' .. 'h : "84 :J1J.O.IT¡I~~, -":!" ,:' "1~.':...1.!i 'f\" o':r.'" '.. ~, ; ,_,;' ~ I ....' """"1'1,',,'" \' §~\"Q-: ,,/.1, ~.,~, ' - I "';,".:.. "'" ',:j'."".._" )'-'-'<~~'_"<' r~ "'~ D' .i.!:,Tj~ "5=;' " ~ .,;;~;' .,::- ';~. ::",~ '7; ¡, ~ :. ( : ~ .11. '" ',~ '" "h" : n" .. ""', , FEDERAL j~ ~ ,'~'~:~ ";.: / ".é.= ~ ),.: ~þ¡ ,~kr-""-"' WAY .::;::::::. i 10 ~.., ..~~... ..~ r~JE ; ~~j; ¡¡ ~. 10 ,..,.,.."_...,,,......, i ~ ~ ' "". ~~ :=,~'.. . -' ~~ :;; ~ PI.nninoU.dll"" (253) 945-2000 [......no ~~":/f( Mf ¡'TO: K,~~Jn:.ñ":S ------.., -ñi ¡,~ ~.,.. ¡;.~_~m- ~ ".........w......'" ..rc..", .." hdKnIW."w""" 11 E F G"""""" H II-2 Junior High Sc E F -,,~..... ".,..... G J H '\ '¡¡'~~ii;;:JìíC~,: m .~"u::u: _..)¡),:'~' l:t~,'¡ ,~:.'7~~::.~i ?ti:, !4:.,.~.t:" I,Ci,: i' --- _T9 '" ~"....','-,','" ";~~ / ~~ Code.. . Code.. . 1 " J I_I " "",,:\ ;~jF~- = " ,,: ",.. I r : 10 Adelaide C-6 64 lIIahee E-9 \ i ~~I ¡~~~ " ,j ~.' < ."" ~.'~ .,: 16 Brigadoon B-8 66 Kilo G-6 2 \;11 ;'lI\qfr~" ,. r. ;;¡~ '\~'," :i,./'.': 2 ~~ ~~:~~~~e ~:: :~ ~~~=wea ~~ "..J:~ ~;;"~;N¡ . 't1; ~~.: :~ '," , " "","r 14 Green Gables A-7 70 Saghalie C-8 =, ,",: ,.. , ','.~"" ",':..; ""~ .: ¡ ¡ ,_. : 30 lake Dolloff G-6 65 Totem G-3 '~1II'~1I I ,':" .-, ~,::::. 4í ii'", : ,..', ' '; '- 11 lake Grove D-6 8 Merit F-6 ~f;~w;,'~~ :~:,:'. :~4 -lj""" ;¡:ri" ','; ~ ",Jp.,2SBSI 33 lakeland F-9 't ,~c'}.j, ':".' ':::: ¡; il;\' E.:~': ',.....,"" " 2 Mark Twain F-4 ~:::~~""¿P'-"~ -;::~~ "¡ ..' 'f ,¡~ 29 Meredith Hill H-5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 3 "...,',.'..'" ; IS;:¿', ;"IJt . "', [/>1 <;f," '" ,," ,."" ," '. :!,§ I 3 6 MIrror lake E-6 " .. ""'" '~V9 ~ ' ~.. , .. ï 5 NautIlus E-5 Code -- . ' """r'H, ~ ' ; .. " < 15 Olympic View C-7 ~-.. : ~ " J, ./ ~ : 21 Panther lake E-8 80 Dec¡¡tur C-6 ',' p' ,-"' ,;r:;J ,~ J ';'" ,",oJ.';" V I ~ : 37 RaInier VIew F-10 81 Federal Way E-5, ," " , ,; 1/, ....,', ¡; " :,. ~ 24 SIlver lake D-7 8 Harty S, Truman,.F, '-6. i """' »;,' " - ,7~, jl , " "¡lJ;~"":~,~, 'V~", , 26 Star lake G-3 8 Merit F-6 .: t ' ;/,f;-,è {",..e:I¥'"", "",;~' '" 25 Sunnycrest G-2 '<;', "~~ ",.. ;,' , ....Lo..,'."""", , ',: 13 Twinlakes B-6;"""" .¡ ~:f;'~ '~'."Æ""O -""'t1';~,:~:; ;"~ ,: 2~ ~:~~~Od ~-: ~~~~~~:~~~~ISites~~~ """";";' ~~.~ ¡Ij,"~ ,:,::.., '.::-- ." iE¡j:,,-¡r ';" 7~.t'" tJ:, ~ 1 Woodmont F-3 . ;';;,:'0. ~"'¡Î'} i;:: ;,_.. :.:..L '¥;; ,c.,' 'r[,':" . 100 Educational Service Center F-6','" .'. ,,'ii ",..",~ .-;r;.",¡;:", '.' < ' .,,;.: ; .286 ' 99 FutureSupportServices E-8 -" Codod~--. ~:o;'.' ';, ~ " ,,-';,: "~:'..' ,:., ': "",~ "'4:.':" '~'~?~~:';h 97 Maintenance-Operations-Transportation E-6 -" , ~," .'. ' ""ì;i,' j'; ;. "1,,",- .' 'ii . ~,'" Parks -- , l~ :~~~~'~j: ~ "',::',"':-:':\: ' :~~o,'.: " <~~ ~,! t;~~;.~i,1o ~,:~, ::..,;~~: ~ "':~5 "FJDER~L WAY,' ~.~."s, H,,'NGT~N and, V/~/NIT C, , \.:~,,:.7 ;::!~~. ~'a';':::I-'~I~,~' '~" i~ì::""~,.:"",-",,,:,_,..;,i!',"'?""~'<~-'~,':",:O}, .~'->:,','" "<,, j.~" ~¡ I I ~,;'"i;"""o,'" ~.:",,; ,.",,:..,' ..~,',' ':'2:~MI;~ "-J:7::;~,,~:~,, , -;¡; .. SOUND ';~'"ii',:~""" ...~"¡.....:..,' ,',"'" ,:~_,I _~/~:""'~'/ ""':,~- t PV"': ;Ii;;~' --~,~:~- .,,'",:,'~'~:,:¡:;;,~¡/;'i¡'- f"" : ',"7'," ..-' '::~~~;,~~,';'" ~":"":,':"'.':,',";' !,I~,".i'~:",',':;' !!~J'J1-"; ~., '.~:,:~~-'::.;~ ' ,\~~~" ',',.'.., "-':..:.' '~".,' '96 :,:,,'~~..-,,~;~:::: \~:- ,._,,:'..:II;¡,;~~¡';";'~"-;;~ I "', ".",.,";¡¡,~- .P' C, """I--'"~~..Jj";C;,,,, "',:,d;";:::i '. 6 ",;,;~',"'" ~"- ";".;';,:~'.l;A' .."j"'.,'- :";,;': ";:,',, , ',," '",-" "',e" , ~,,:~-, 4.il ! Þ-=- ::""' ,',' ,:','~.yt.lf ",":"" -,;;' ~~~'-r¡D~'::,~'1hd:~, ' ~:, "..:i~,,~ ',;':,4~" ; "."" ,1I?fr,Ji; ;I;'!:"""",: 6, 'NT t ~.~.~:~~~ ¡~',t, :,::""j.;:\ B > '~~:l.:£~;;:,. ~,F ~ '::;'~I~~,F¡,;J ~ ;'".:~/~ S3>OS: ;~I\?;;:,'~! ','ITATEPA.K', ,,~:;' "","'" '," ..-. , "," ", i:i,: ~H'f~'3; i",,'l, ':;" ',I'I , ,~ I ~ " ' """'.', d , . , A!Ni.:.. '; 7ì .' :ir¡'¡OU; y.,', ,t~, ' , ~::,'Z ~:\ (/ :"'.." ~ ,.::~ ,~;" \, ,;€. d ! ,¡ JG¡ -,,/,,"'~,' q¡.J'~"'- Iåii"""'~; ".""..,~~,;;~. i 7 '¡".e.,': .' ,~.. .,"", ~:""'::"~'~~"'" """".IIiI:\'c".,r,.."" ~.~"'.":""'(""'.¡¡,D"'.'\)""" -,'\",.""., L~, ',~,o ';1".- '.", .."', ;1'51""""" "'. ,"'"::'.", ~"'.:I" '<':<-;',\r'-F",.....,., "'N' - " "", ,':"', ';,"'A I!',";¡rl;, (~,">:',<' '" ;.~",......u. 7 , ',:~e ~~<,., , /I~J:~~(;~ ~::~:. s},~~./;.:J ~~.~,;.:;'J. ~~ ~SI330. '~)';:' .~~ '. ¡ - ~~. If :if.' .~ ~. "./k.',~,~ , .,., ..,:, -;X'L;~P;t... 'm, 85~' m' . rY'='¡1i '1(.,-, .N ; B ~." ~~;~\;;j;:f!:5C~1I c.~:?'~'~~~:'~;)~. : ~ ¡ ~",""",L:i!;'::.~¿<~.;,;".,~.,,:,,;, '~,~i¡ ...,'j W . E 8~~_o,\,.~~J'~:1'< /{:! ~~~:i:'.~~,~ U~~/j ~lI..A;"j ~;~",~../L~~">~'~ /I§ p~8 ," -.' ,w"",'~" : ~I, / .i;' ,\.~;,:"..,., "" I~I .... ' ~,¡ " . ,"'~" "," .; ,;'" ~IS;4.SI~~:"'. '\ +'~"¡¡"')¡,.~:'".~~;:./¡¡¡.~.:'~,,"'"" ~..~:¡'..'.; '" '. .", :.:.."...~ < ~g¡'" ' """""'~~¡i;>J:::j ]6"""', """"",".:AA".'" ~:"'~~;.;J:\ ~,¡ ~~. _e..,.~, ~ 2~,~~,~ ' / ;i=-.~" .' ~+:'~~f::8!¡,'Tl,~' ~'$;"'_f~.~'",;, ~"~~ 8'.O""'~" -' W3'.'SI~" 5356S' ~ .... .m..WL .. "";f m ,...;~;,~~- ;il il ~I ~I ;~~~:~ m~, "~~¡i1~:_I'<:'.o ~ ~'~" '., ",:',,~. ~ ~Y , ~~ ~,JI ~I "~r }'án"~:~3:~¡ " I 9 p...............,", . ~ .'" """'," ....:!" i //A,~T::: ;: ~ T~, ¡ljL .",;.9 I ¡'" ; ~.'f:l-""""W~'\""'\""""'" ,,/,:.,.,,;: -" I D"1'~ I;: "'~~,'.It ,; ~,g: ~ '.¥.lJ., ¡ .. ~,J.k::-: . ,JO ~i;:: 0#( r"'~~;;";,i#",~ /'~l j J~¡ ~ ~JO Federal,Way PublIc Schools ¡ ~. J.. MILTON ¡ \ ~ ~ ... [§TI . Planning & F.."li"" ¡ , : Km, COO",", >~ "0) i i 384" - 3>40""""oo,Soo" (253) 945-2000 .......... I p",..."ro<on1V-' ------"', ""-""""'~""""'" ,.dmIW."WA"""'" 11 E F G ""~T 00- H + FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS ~ II-3 Senior High School Boundaries E on MOONE' "" r ""'!:':::..-I""D'.:.':"" G J H '\\~~~.~. ~"\.'(]~":::.::'~~;(~';~/'4~~.~"~::',m.~,.~..~..';",:'.:.:.'1 / n~ ~~ 11 ' "". ~~~"m..., ¡ .~'" II?' : JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Zenllh ,f,,~ ':~, / ,,",; ,,'-":~'~,."'" .. ~ ~S ,~,,! ,.' t~ Codeo,- . Code-- . ;,,:11. 1\ innl~~" : ':u..""".(ft , 10 Ad I Id c~ 64 III h E9 i ~~I ~L..,,~' rï"1 ¡ !.: &. ~ : 16 Brlgadoon B~ 66 Kilo G~ 2 "d"','- ;in:""." r; ~ ,.: ~,~...~' ~:,~¿,~: 2 .~~ ~~;~e~; :~ ;~;wea ~~ ,~.,,-.' :~~;!.1.~~ ~;'1 ,rM.~,,':" ~ ,". "<~ 14 Green Gables A-7 70 Saghalie C~ o;on ~~, " ;: 'o, : ' , 30 LakeDolioff G~ 65 Totem G-3 '~"~lIw.e'e' ¡:":"":':'~7i1--~':~: "rILl;' ¡ ::',:\ O~: j, l- 11 Lake Grove D~ 8 Merit F~ I~ ....P," -. ,..;¡¡;¡ ",. " , " 33 lakeland F-9 ~ "~ì., ;¡;:" ~~~¡ ¡ ¡ ¡I! ::'; , 2 Mark Twain F-4 -'~~'~'.(-;;o_" ':.'.~. fI"" '11 :¡~ 29 MeredithHIll H-5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 3 ¡ ,:";-.~,; ,,'¡.r:'~, ~ ~"".." J 1¡; 3 6 Mirror Lake E~ ; ""¥" ;1;1) e!:fiI""'" < "'-. . ,0 5 Nautilus E-5 Code -- . l "",,' - g§,' " . 15 Olympic View C-7 ~. ' " - ., . ~ 21 Panther Lake E~ 80 Decatur C~ . p' ,,-- ;;,;,'~' " ~ 37 RainlerView F.10 81 Federal Way E-5 ," "J. f ¡ " ¡¡ ,,~" '.' ~ "to, :: ;~ ~~::~O:eFO....t g~ 8~ ~::;~~~~~,:::n ..,~::.. --.O~.~~ .)"'~~UJl'f:~"" '27..::;.¡,,;..;J'~¡/.'..,~,~~.J,I:'~¡I!'!t,,~\\~ - 26 Star Lake G.3 8 Merit F~ /. ".. ",. ¡ . : ¡þf-.~ ~~, 'P.,,' ""~",,,.. ! 25 Su~nyc....t G-2 "I,' "i';i!l ~ u..' " ,,~"_,.'¡""f - ;! "~..._- ...i..... 13 Twin Lakes B~ ...~ 4 ~:.¡.;~~ ~~ "~"";1 '~'~1111 " "l ¡ 27 Valhalla G-4 Future School Sites -.. Wl ~'" ¡ ¡,,;, ~"o 1\ ;i9¡>." 1\,:, '!,' ): 4- 7 Wildwood F-5 Surplus Sites --- ' J~ 1,::-:," . ~, L,,¡¡ ¡ 7:", : 1 Woodmont F-3 ,~ ':' ';', j iill .. ~, ' 100 Educational Service Center F~ 1,/ "'o,' ".' ',.,¡¡f, ..~'. .,,¡i' ,,~ , ; :~ ~':n:~au~:e~:;:~~:-Transportatlon ~~ ~= Cod~'_-. -::òii!"!" '::". ~. c ..,"~' ;~~;~; ~~r.';."', ;¡ ~;~'~~. ~h Parks- 0,0" """;--':".~)'-,"';~' ài"'fi¡'. ',';': .ri"~.~". "", ~:!.:-:~, ~. "::c'!~-" '~'--:S",l U '. .:.:',;,:'" ~.";"'I,', T" '- 5 1 A I B I r ~,,' : ... J :;,[] "-. .:'-,' ' =:-, ., "~ ;,~ n;ßI ~ ~ f" I IsouNO :~:'HÚ~; ,;-'~ ;- ,'tf..~. . .;~~o;.,~~ .",:;,,"~ ¡{~~;~~~ ' ,,~ - U ,EO. "\5~~ -llq~_L,;.)",!-,'~\,' .:' ..),'~¡' .-.; ~¡. '~..,.",-",~,,'.' [.-. p' ;tif:~, .,,~ ~~.'...',"j'~_'::-D;L.-.4~ ',jll,íl 'aa~ Ir~~~o,o, ;!¡¡¡ ~" '~¡~.<>:;;' r~.... ,J Id.~~!¡;;' ~ ,: I ~,~:.': ~"'~<Æ\\'¥.~~.,.~~t~:~~~t [~;';~~' ~..~pv.é~ "I~~J>~ "-"~~ ~;..F"~.;'W'-"."'-;] 6 ill .."',, ,~'~ "', ~..~ - ~ ""iI'..; "" ,," -"", ,;:;~'.,: . ", ,: "",. ,..n: ..'~ -;. :ì~ ¿....... , :4::'~;"- ^~~_.~;,'~;;'~,t~~. :::,:.: .. ~,~w.'Ixl~:;a.,,:.,~j~I""'.'::'~' ¡ ,.,..""',~'u, '111'i:,,0'"'=: 6, , . I~~' ,"V~~=;":1:. 1 ;'~,-::'-<"",:"~,,,'. :;;¡j¡j.,?",¡. ;"'~;~~, ' ;.illDì.t ,. ~.- i "'NT : :...:-"]' !.'~.~' ~,..A'w"".~o,:-: ,~ . ""'~'~"... ¡íI ','.::;; ¡'~;H' s..o,t \;1 i!¡iJ A f~~~~;e.l91J~~:.a,... <":/~~lj~.n1:r..'fU:-'".,:,.'~ ':":~;'.j:ír~'~'~~':: :::tØ;I, ,: :~"~':;')1'-~:~~r::J:J ~ .'.::~ ¡J.'\~\ ¡.'~~'«. l Ii' : ..",~...",. ,.~~.3. 'o'..c'"" !. . ,-,W",! "'f~ ¡ 7 "'I.,.~" .. '::'~ï~-I'::""'" ,~,~-~ ,,~",.~...:/' i'~{.:";H. .4.. e_.'.,.\"""'~'\~~""""'.' ~ ~~.; ._,,' ~ ,::¡,,¡;f,~~';, .,' . ",,< ¡~i~":"~'I.~- .. ...~~~.~¡ 1;1{,<'~',~, 'il ¡,." o....o.i..JJ /rs> 7 . ~'~'I"""':""O".O" ~;;;:'<'"'¡"!~ " ~. - ~ '" '., /~~.,:_\i~'~~~~~::« ,5;~.~<...;.fi~~þ';~ \~ i;.,.~" :~ ~~/~,,~c~.v.o,o"" ~,i1I1î I'.' ~ .-N ' B . W':o~' ,., ~ o.;¿~£:;1,c;Y!- JIIIIII " ~ N:::~:::';~::" 3~,"'<~ff]~i", ~ ~ I~ ~~ W ~ E 8 o~ ~I '-""" r:~; ,.' '~::~- ~ ~I ~ ~ ; /' ~ll. Ai ~.'. ,..~~::~./ ~ ~Ll lE ~. 8 ~ ,-'" '.~"'~i ", ~:I il ;~ /Í \\.,Ã' ~:ñïl" ~~\;'~!';~"'C '¡. ~ ~. ;~"-. '~': '¡.::.'" ~I"""~~ 0> ',,"- '\ ~".1.1",/;. ~~ ~ ,;-~, :'.." I , . .. ~. .0>, ":'~.i,j~:~;:;1;' ."" ~ICUÐ.~=- ~.'E I~:.:~:~ ~.: . r~HL~ls:~1~': ~'5~St i ;~ .w~~t;:J:¡~ ¡~ ~~:" å. ". Î:- "':':::'..':,"" ';;¡;IIiI:I~, " . ~ ~.."T~I ~L-~h' ~ ..Y.¡' ¡,'.: ;:1"~r.1 r;'~";"::¡L 311 -.;........", '," ~..,""I~M:, """'~ j..',,~ , ; '11, ". '9 -::-=,:- , ~ .", - >n ", 0 "",:i: ! '~~ > ¡ 1II...i[";;¿.;' ,'" .. . .....'1,' ;I:~, :~:~ ,9 ~I' . " , - , .' <, I .;1 :. " '~ ~:;,.~ ,~~- "..~ '::: . . ~- , > . . . .. I ~: !""';..,,", "\¡r r1 ¡; ""~-' "",,~1. ;~lc'~_;', ~ ~~ ~~.. ~'~.~ ~7-# ~ '~~""'~~".,,,:, ;"'~"I,.; ;;¡n~I"( :- ~ O.~ ¡ ¡'" !:" 1M: "o,~", 3 ,.' " , : FEDERAL, 1~~ ~ "",'" ,<~~~ ':"'~/ ~.;:~:: ~~. ij ,~ ~L,.."",' _nn_,,' WAY .:::;:::. j JO ..... P "'Ifffi J¡ IIÍII'" '; § .....""'~,; , ;': ¡;"- = ~, 10 , ~. "" ,.",. $" -"" ~ ~ 1"'.:.."-".:"."."" ¡ ¡-¡;;;; . ~~ "'" -. I-=!..' ~ ~ ~ ::",~~:::: (253) 945-2000 [n..,..n ~,~':,~,J, MILTÓN '~: IL~~~' K'n:~~b~~l ------m ~,L,j~~:. L ""...W""w...... II E F G D"."-r ...... H FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS II-4 SECTION III S UPPOR T DOCUMENTATION FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENT A TION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast - 1999 through 2004 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units III-I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program Capacity for each of the schools in the District. This Full Time Equivalent (FIE) capacity is based on: . The number of classrooms available in each school Any special requirements at each school The contracted class load by grade level . . In general, the District's current standard provides that the ayerage class size for a standard classroom for grade K is 24 students, for grade 1-6 is 26 students and grades 7-12 is 25 students. Gate (Gifted and Talented Education) classrooms are 25 students, individual education programs classrooms are 15 students, and special education classrooms are 12 students. This size is determined based upon current ratios and trends as well as the classroom physical size. Educational Program Capacities change eyery year. This analysis is for the 1998/99 school year. The capacity of an individual school could and does change at any time depending on program changes which may require additional space. III-2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BillLDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY JUNIOR HIGH BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Adelaide 488 Brigadoon 528 Camelot 374 Enterprise 512 Green Gables 494 Lake Dolloff 482 Lake Grove 476 Lakeland 488 Mark Twain 503 Meredith Hill 498 Mirror Lake 398 Nautilus 542 Olympic View 450 Panther Lake 514 Rainier View 468 Sherwood Forest 550 Silver Lake 528 Star Lake 502 Sunnycrest 462 Twill Lakes 502 Valhalla 494 Wildwood 428 Woodmont 450 1998 TOTAL 11,131 Illahee 821 Kilo 854 Lakota 741 Sacajawea 828 Saghalie 768 Totem 709 1998 TOTAL 4,721 IJunior High Average I 787 I SENIOR HIGH BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Decatur 1,121 Federal Way 1,308 Thomas Jefferson 1,266 1998 TOTAL 3,695 ISenior High Average I 1,232 ~ AL TERNA TlVE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 484 194 ¡Elementary Average 1998 TOTAL 210 Notes: Elementary program capacities are based on the number of teaching stations in the building, contracted class size, and special use classrooms in place during the 98/99 school year. All available instructional space is calculated, Secondary program capacities are based on peak loading, The calculation is based on 25 students per available teaching stations. Capacities were calculated by the Study and Survey Committee. III-3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until penn anent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When pennanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school for an interim classroom, or used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as pennanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. III.4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS "ON I"STRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIO:-lAL Adelaide 3 Brigadoon 1 Camelot 1 Enterprise 2 Green Gables 1 Lake Dolloff 3 Lake Grove 2 Lakeland 1 Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 1 Mirror Lake 2 Nautilus 1 Olympic View 2 Panther Lake 3 Rainier View 2 Sherwood Fores~ 3 Silver Lake 4 Star Lake 4 Sunnycrest 1 Twin Lakes 2 1 Valhalla Wildwood 4 W oodmont 2 TOTAL 48 1 PORTABLES LOCATED A T JUNIOR HIGHS NON IN"TRl:CTlO:-lU INSTRUCTIO"AL Illahee 3 Kilo 3 1 Lakota 3 Sacajawea 2 Saghalie 4 Totem 5 TOTAL 20 1 III-5 PORTABLES LOCATED A T SENIOR HIGHS NON NSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIOML Decatur 4 Federal Wav 1 Thomas Jefferson TrumanlMerit 8 1 TOTAL 13 1 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Science & Testing K" 1 5-Mile Lake 1 MOT 1 Clothing Bank 1 TOTAL 4 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Mirror Lake 1 Sherwood Forest 1 Total 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget deyelopment. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are deriyed directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at yarious levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include yocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort surviyal analysis. Cohort surviyal is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical infonnation to develop averages and project the ayerages forward. This method does not trace indiyidual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study seyeral projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analjsis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects infonnation on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. Federal Way Public Schools is using three distinct methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated . The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical infonnation and how they are weighted. . The second method uses enrollment-forecasting software tied to a geographic infonnation system. MicroSAMTM software establishes survival, migrant and repeater rates for each grade level in a pre-defined geographic area. These rates are matched to the number of housing units per area. The rates are then used to project the following year's enrollment based on the number of planned new housing units. The software will project for five years. . The third method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade leyel and to aggregate these projections for the district leyel. The Enrollment MasterTM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. III-6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Short-term budget projections may be more conservatiye than the standard grade progression model. For the 1998/99 school year, the district chose the Enrollment MasterTM projection using a two- parameter method. This is the method suggested when a district is increasing or decreasing at a rate that is different than the standard grade progression model. Standard grade progression is a reasonably accurate method for the near term future when the near future looks much like the near past. Using six years of enrollment history in the Federal Way District encompasses high growth years and zero growth years which fall outside the range of the standard progression model. This phenomenon is partially explained by the incorporation of the City of Federal Way and its affect on new housing starts in recent history. Long range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. Federal Way Public Schools' bng-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional :1emographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial management for the State of Washington. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. Federal Way Public Schools is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a yision of the school district in the future. 111-7 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE (K Headcount = ,5 FTE; Junior High FTE=.989 Headcount; Senior High FTE = ,932 Headcount) Total K -12 Percent School Year Elementa Junior Hi h Senior Hi h FTE Chan e 1992-93 10,342 4,352 3,681 18,375 1993-94 10,545 4,432 3,750 18,727 1.9% 1994-95 10,505 4,626 3,758 18,889 0.9% 1995-96 10,689 4,838 3,796 19,323 2.2% 1996-97 10,863 4,930 3,913 19,706 1.9% 1997-98 11,123 5,073 4,082 20,278 2.8% 1998-99 11,480 5,099 4,060 20,639 1.7% P1999-00 11,656 5,153 4,321 21,130 2.3% P2000-01 11,799 5,247 4,391 21,444 1.5% nOOl-02 11,796 5,491 4,410 21,774 1.5% P2002-03 11,795 5,735 4,416 21,946 0.1% New Configuration Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-1 High School 9-12 nO03-04 9,976 5,703 6,539 22,211 1.2% P2004-05 10,102 5,610 6,710 22,492 1.2% Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 23,000 22 , 000 " '" ",... 21,000 .' . , . . ë 5 20,000 u 'a ! 19,000 118,000 17,000 16,000 . 15,000 r.vc?? r>:f<t- ,.,þ:<t' ~c$> ró~ ,,~ ,,~ ~ 4} 4!' 3,0% . ." 2.5% 2.0% = "' !! 1.5% u .5 if. 1.0% 0.5% ,0,0% _en .S>. I:) " (\, (';) .s::- -II. ~ ().';?J ~vr PP >:J\:> ..p n~ ~. r>:f\J #'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I:)V ~ I:) " " q," q,'fS q,'T) q,tfS &~ q,tfS q, vrf:' ~# School Year mmaFTE 111-8 -+- Percent of Change FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Junior High, and Senior High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the district to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, junior high, and senior high levels individually. The notes at (he bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. III-9 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES Actual - - Projected - - CAPACITY 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 BUll..DING PROGRAM Z CAPACITY 19,757 19,757 19,731 19,811 20,235 ~ 21,009 22,333 ~ Add or subtract changes to capacity ., ~ c. .. ~ Special Education Changes (26) (26) (26) (26) (j (26) 0 Truman High modernization and expansion 106 = ' ::1 Increase Capacity at Three High Schools 450 CICI = New Middle School 800 ., ~ New High School :-. 1,350 Q = Adjusted Program Capacity 19,757 19,731 19,811 20,235 21,009 22,333 22,333 ENROLLMENT Basic FIE Enrollment 20,619 21,130 21,444 21,774 21,946 22,218 22,492 Internet Academy Enrollment 181 500 700 750 800 850 900 Basic FIE Enrollment without Internet Academy 20,438 20,630 I 20)44 21,024 21.146 21,368 21,592 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,025 2,025 2,175 2,175 2,175 2,175 2,175 Add/Subtract Portable Capacity Federal Way Public Academy Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,025 2,175 2,175 2,175 2,175 2,175 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCA TABLE CAPACITY 1,344 1,276 1,242 1,386 2,038 3,140 2,916 III-I0 CAPSUM98 HEADER.xú 04/29/99 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Actual - - Projected - - CAPACITY 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 :z 2003 2004 "' BUILDING PROGRAM :;; CAPACITY 11,131 11,131 11,131 11,105 11,079 ~ 11,053 11,027 ., ~ Q. "' n .... ... ~ 1. Special Education Changes (26) (26) (26) ::S .. (~6) H ::'I ~ ., ~ :::-. Adjusted Program Capacity 11,131 11,131 11,105 11,079 11,053 ~ 11,027 11,001 ::s ENROLLMENT Basic FfE Enrollment 11,480 11,656 11,799 11,796 11,795 9,976 10,102 2. Internet Academy 53 100 125 125 150 150 150 Basic FIE Enrollment without Internet Academy 11,427 11,556 11,674 11,671 11,645 9,826 9,952 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Add/Subtract portable capacity Move to High School SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 904 775 631 608 608 2,401 2,124 NOTES: 1. Add Programs 3 ECEAP, 1 SBD(Severe1y Behavioral Disordered) and 1 Pre-School Program This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated. 2, Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available, This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 111-11 CAPSUM98 HEADER.xú 04121/99 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Actual - - Projected - - CAPACITY 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Z 2003 2004 BUILDING PROGRAM tI> ~ CAPACITY 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 ~ 5,521 5,521 '" ~ Q. tI> ("':I ............ .............. 1. Add New Middle School 800 Q ::s ..... ::'I ~ '" ~ =. Q Adjusted Program Capacity 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 5,521 ::s 5,521 5,521 ENROLLMENT Basic FIE Enrollment 5,080 5,153 5,247 5,498 5,735 5,703 5,610 2. Internet Academy 69 200 275 275 275 175 175 Basic FIE Enrollment without Internet Academy 5,011 4,953 4,972 5,223 5,460 5,528 5,435 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 500 500 650 650 650 650 650 Add/Subtract portable capacity 4, Federal Way Public Academy 150 Adjusted Portable Capacity 500 650 650 650 650 650 650 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCA TABLE CAPACITY 210 418 399 148 711 643 736 NOTES: 1. Add new middle school 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 4 Federal Way Public Academy will increase capacity at one junior high site. 111-12 CAPSUM98 HEADER.xIs 04123/99 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Actual - - Projected - - CAP A CITY 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ~ 2003 2004 BUILDING PROGRAM ~ ~ CAPACITY 3,905 3,905 3,905 4,011 4,461 ~ 4,461 5,811 ., ~ Q. Add or subtract changes in capacity ~ n 1. Truman Remodel 106 c:> = 2. Add Capacity to Three High Schools 450 ::1 ~ 3. Add New High School ., 1,350 ~ =. c:> Adjusted Program Capacity 3,905 3,905 4,011 4,461 4,461 = 5,811 5,811 ENROLLMENT Basic FfE Enrollment 4,120 4,321 4,398 4,480 4,416 6,539 6,780 4. Internet Academy 59 200 300 350 375 525 575 Basic Ed without Internet Academy 4,061 4,121 4,098 4,130 4,041 6,014 6,205 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 5. Current Portable Capacity 325 325 325 325 325 325 325 Add\Subtract portable capacity Add from Elementary Adjusted Portable Capacity SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 169 109 238 656 745 122 56 NOTES: 1. Truman High School modernization and expansion 2. Add capacity to three existing high schools 3. Add new high school 4. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 5. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number ofponables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are ayailable. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 111-13 CAPSUM98 HEADER.xb O4!1fýfJ9 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was also substanially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single family units and multi-family units, which were constructed in the last five- (5) years. - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act. Single Family Units 1 $2,384.1 1$804.1 Multi-Family Units III-14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT GENERATION NEW CONSTRUcrION IN PRIOR 5 YEARS Single Family Student Generation Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Junior High Senior High Total Single Family Multi-Family Elementary Junior High Senior High Student Student Student Student DEVELOPMENT Dwellings Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor (98) Brookshire North 21 0 7 3 4 0.33333333 0.14285714 0.19047619 0.66666667 (98) StoneBrook 110 0 50 23 13 0.45454545 0.20909091 0.11818182 0.78181818 (97) Southern Rose 25 0 17 5 2 0.68000000 0.20000000 0.08000000 0.96000000 (97) Grouse Pointe 30 0 16 4 4 0.53333333 O. 13333333 O. 13333333 0.80000000 ................................-.......' (96) Bellacarino Woods 106 0 49 12 14 0.46226415 0.11320755 0.13207547 0.70754717 (96) The Highlands 69 0 21 5 6 0.30434783 0.07246377 0.08695652 0.46376812 (95) Camelot III 21 0 14 3 0 0.66666667 0.14285714 0.00000000 0.80952381 (95) Campus Glen 98 0 18 10 10 0.18367347 0.10204082 0.10204082 0.38775510 (94) Parkwood Campus 52 0 26 14 8 0.50000000 0.26923077 0.15384615 0.92307692 (94) Alder Glen 44 0 17 11 5 0.38636364 0.25000000 0.11363636 0.75000000 Total 576 0 235 90 66 Student Generation 0.4080 0.1563 0.1146 0.6788 Multi-Family StUdent Generation Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Junior High Senior High Total Single Family Multi-Family Elementary Junior High Senior High Student Student Student ,Student DEVELOPMENT Dwellings Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor Barclay Ridge 0 228 21 12 13 0.09210526 0.05263158 0.05701754 0.20175439 Saddlebrook 0 211 6 3 5 0.02843602 0.01421801 0.02369668 0.06635071 0 439 27 15 18 0.0615 0.0342 0.0410 0.1367 YIELD99_B.xIs 041231'19 8;C!'iAM III-IS FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Facility Facility Student Factor Cost / Student Factor MFR Cost! Cost! MFR Elemental)' Jr High Sr High Acrea¡¡;e Acre Capacity SFR SFR 0.00 $0 484 0.4080 0,0615 $0 $0 ....................."..... """"""""""""'" .......................... ................................ """""""""""""'" 20.00 .........~.~9.~9Q9.. 787 0.1563 0,0342 $199 $43 """""""""""""" .......................... ........................,....... ............................. 40.00 $80,000 1,232 0.1146 0.0410 $298 $106 TOTAL $496 $150 School Construction Cost: % Perm Fac.l FacHity Student Factor Facility Student Factor Cost! Cost! Elemental)' Jr High Sr High Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR 96.95% $0 484 0.4080 0,0615 $0 $0 ............................ ........................... .......................... """""""""""""""" ............................. 96.95% .~n.!9.29.~9Q9.. 787 0.1563 0.0342 $3,273 $716 """""""""""""" .......................... """""""""""""""" ............................. 96,95% $50,000,000 1,232 0,1146 0.0410 $4,509 $1,613 TOTAL $7,782 $2,329 Temporary Facility Cost: % Temp Fac, T tal S Ft Facility S' Student Factor SFR Facility C Student Factor MFR Cost! SFR Cost! MFR Elemental)' Jr High Sr High O )q ost lze 3.05% .........~.~~.~~.~~.. 25 0.4080 0.0615 $28 $4 """""""""""""" """"""""""""" ................................ ............................. 3.05% .........~.~~.~~.~~.. 25 0,1563 0.0342 $11 $2 """""""""""""" .......................... """""""""""""""" ............................. 3.05% $55,361 25 0,1146 0.0410 $8 $3 TOTAL $46 $9 State Matching Credit Calculation: Boeck Cost! Sq. Ft. S F S d State M h Student Factor SFR Student Factor MFR Cost/ SFR Cost! MFR Elemental)' Jr High New Sr High iq t tu ent atc $99.68 0 60.62% 0.4080 0,0615 $0 $0 ............................ """"""""""""'" .......................... """""""""""""""" ............................. $99.68 112 60.62% 0.1563 0.0342 $1,058 $231 """""""""""""" """"""""""""'" .......................... """""""""""""""" ............................. $99.68 120 60.52% 0.1146 0.0363 $830 $263 Total $1,887 $494 Single Family Multi-Family Residences Residences $496 $150 $7,782 $2,329 $46 $9 ($1,887) ($494) ($1,670) ($387) $4,767 $1,607 $2,384 $804 $2,384 $804 ~ 111-16 Tax Payment Credit Calculation Average Assessed Value (April 98) Capital Bond Interest Rate (March 99) Net Present Value of Average Dwelling Years Amortized Property Tax Levy Rate Present Value of Revenue Stream Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost Permanent Facility Cost Temporal)' Facility Cost State Match Credit Tax Payment Credit Sub-Total 50% Local Share IImpact Fee lmpod F.. 99 B.x18 04123/99 9:49 AM SFR MFR ....~.~.~.~!9.2.~...... ""'~}~"'~~'~""'" 5.11% 5.11% ............................ ............................ ..~~?~.z.~?~.~2.... ....~n.~!~.n...... 10 10 ............................ """""""""""""" $1.42 $ 1.42 $1,670 $387 SECTION IV SUMMARY OF CHANGES FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION IV SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 1997/98 Plan and the 1998/99 Plan are listed. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACll...ITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES Leased Space is added to the inventory CURRENT INVENTORY OF NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITES Developed Property Leased space is added to the inventory Undeveloped Property Site 98 is sold Site 9 is pending sale. NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES Expansion of Decatur High School, Federal Way High School and Thomas Jefferson High School is added. Parking Safety, Network Upgrades, Automated Libraries, Elementary Playgrounds, High School Sports Fields, and Emergency Communications are added NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES New Elementary site and New Elementary School are removed. New High School site, New High School and New Middle School are added. The Six Year Finance has been rolled forward to reflect 1998/2004 IV-I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION ill - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Changes to building program capacity between the 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan and the 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page ill-3. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page ill-5 STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 1998 through 2004. The new forecast reflects an increase in student population at a decreasing rate observed in the District. The student forecast can be found on page ill-8 CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at CUITent buildings are shown as increases to capacity. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan and the 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page IV-3. IV-2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 1997/98 TO 1998/99 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan and the 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments. IMPACT FEE Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 97.34 % to Report #3 OSPI 96.95 % Percent Temporary Facilities 2.66% to Updated portable inventory 3.05 % Temporary Facility Cost $62,368 to Updated cost of most recently $55,361 purchased portable (Adelaide Elementary) Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft $97.23 to Change per SPI $99.68 State Match 59.89% to Change per SPI 60.62 % A verage Assessed Value SFR- Per Puget Sound Educational Service $143,979 to District (ESD 121) $153,095. MFR - $34,641 To $35,488. Capital Bond Interest Rate 5.19% to Market Rate 5.11 % Property Tax Levy Rate $1.47to $1.42 Per King County IV-3 Mission Federal Way Public Schools is obligated to ensure all students develop academic skills and responsible behaviors to be successful contributing members of society. Vision Every student will possess a world-class set of skills to become a successful participant in society. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 31405 18th Ave S Federal Way W A 98003-5433 (253) 945-2000 ~j) FEDEAAL' WAY~ This document is published by the Business Services Department of Federal Way Public Schools. April 1999 PUBLIC SCHOOLS For more information please call: (253) 945-2041 Every Student... World-Class Skills Jody Putman, Director of Business CITY OF .- --- ~-- ~""'~r7'~ - - ~~ ~'-- ~~~ DATE: May 11, 1999 TO: Phil Watkins, Chair Land Use/Transportation Committee FROM: Rick Perez, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed 2000-2005 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) and Arterial Street Improvement Plan (ASIP) BACKGROUND In accordance with the requirements of Chapters 35.77 and 47.26 of the Revised Code of Washington, the City of Federal Way adopted its original TIP and ASIP on July 23, 1991. The City is also required to adopt a revised TIP and ASIP on an annual basis that reflects the City's current and future street and arterial needs. The City is required to hold a minimum of one public hearing on the revised plans which is proposed for the June 1, 1999 City Council meeting. Once the revised plans have been adopted by Resolution, a copy of the respective plans must be filed with the Washington State Secretary of Transportation and the Washington State Transportation Improvement Board. REVISED PLANS Attached for your review and comment are the proposed 2000 - 2005 TIP and ASIP. The 6-year TIP and ASIP respond to Growth Management Act concurrency requirements. The proposed plans do not significantly differ from the previous year's plans. However, six new projects have been added to the 6-year TIP and ASIP based on concurrency needs: . S 312th Street at 8th Avenue S signalization and addition of right-turn lanes on 8th Avenue S. 8th A venue S has reached capacity at this intersection and meets signal warrants, and was listed on the 20-year CIP in 1998's Comprehensive Plan amendment. S 320th Street from 8th Avenue S to SR 99 addition ofHOV lanes. This section of S 320th Street has reached capacity in the morning peak and will reach capacity in the evening peak by 2005. This project was listed on the 20-year CIP in 1998's Comprehensive Plan amendment. S 348th Street at pt Avenue S addition of a second left-turn lane southbound, and westbound and southbound right -turn lanes. This intersection has reached capacity and was listed on the 20-year CIP in 1998's Comprehensive Plan amendment. . . . S 312th Street at 28th Avenue S addition of a southbound right-turn lane. The southbound approach at this all-way stop intersection has reached capacity, but does not currently meet signal warrants. S 336th Street at 9th Avenue S signal modifications. This intersection will reach capacity by 2005. This project would convert the protected left-turn phases to protected/permitted left-turn phasing and allow left-tuns from the southbound through lane. S 336th Street at pt Avenue S signal modifications. This intersection will reach capacity by 2005. This project would convert the protected left-tun phases to protected/permitted and extend the southbound left-turn lane to reduce the potential for rear-end accidents. . . In addition, two non-motorized projects have been added to improve pedestrian safety: . pt Avenue S from S 356th Street to S 36Pt Place shoulder improvement. This project would provide a shoulder walkway on the west side of 1 st A venue S to Illahee Junior High School. S 314th Street from 20th Avenue S to 23rd Avenue S sidewalk improvement. This project would install ADA-compliant curb ramps on the existing sidewalk on the south side of S 314th Street and install new sidewalk on the north side of S 314th Street through Hillside Plaza. . RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of the attached resolution adopting the 2000-2005 Transportation Improvement Plan at the public hearing to be held June 1, 1999. RAP:Ah Attachments K:\LUTC\1999\2KTIP.Wpd TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT Pl ,TIPI- 2000 TO 2005 I Map 10 I CAPITAL PROJECT LIST 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 I Total I 1 S 32Oth St @ SR 99: Add turn lanes 136,200 1,482,900 1,619,100 2 S 336th SI: 13th Ave S - 18th Ave S: Widen to 4/5 lanes 693,500 693,500 3 Military Rd S @ S 304th SI: Add turn lanes 704,000 704,000 4 Military Rd S @ S Star Lake Rd: Signalize, add left-turn lane 180,000 180,000 5 SR 99: S 312th St - S 324th SI: Add HOV lanes 756,000 8,395,000 9,151,000 6 S 312th SI: SR 99 - 23rd Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes 4,536,000 4,536,000 7 SW 34Oth SI @ Hoyt Rd SW: Signalize, add turn lanes . 232,000 232,000 8 23rd Ave S: S 317th St - S 324th SI: Widen to 5 lanes 800,000 3,172,000 4,301,000 8,273,000 9 SR 509 @ 8th Ave SW: Signalization, left turn lanes 279,000 279,000 10 21 st Ave SW @ SW 334th St: Relocate fire signal 180,000 180,000 11 SR 99 @ S 33Oth St: Signalization, left-turn lanes 30,000 295,000 325,000 12 S 288th St @ SR 99: Add left-turn lanes 1,325,000 1,325,000 13 S 312th St @ 14th Ave S: Signalization 180,000 180,000 14 SR 99: S 324th St - S 34Oth SI: Construct HOV lanes 950,000 10,722,000 11,672,000 15 S 336th St @ Weyerhaeuser Wy S: Construct roundabout 649,000 649,000 16 S 320th St @ 1 st Ave S: Add 2nd left-turn lanes WB and NB 1,739,000 1,739,000 17 SR 99: S 284th St - SR 509: Construct HOV lanes 960,000 8,672,000 9,632,000 18 S 312th St @ 8th Ave S: Construct NB, SB right-turn lanes, signal 200,000 200,000 19 S 32Oth SI: 8th Ave S - SR 99; Add HOV lanes 6,191,000 6,191,000 20 S 348th St: 9th Ave S - SR 99: Add HOV lanes, EB righi-turn lane al SR99 3,096,000 3,096,000 21 S 348th St @ 1 st Ave S: Add WB and SB right-turn lanes 1,433,000 1,433,000 22 S 312th St @ 28th Ave S: Add SB right-turn lane 100,000 100,000 23 S 32Oth St @ 20th Ave S: Add 2nd left-turn lanes EB, WB 1,358,000 1,358,000 24 S 356th SI: 1st Ave S - SR 99: Widen to 5 lanes 7,205,000 7,205,000 25 21 st Ave SWI SW 357th St: SW 356th St - 22nd Ave SW: Extend 2-lane collector 750,000 750,000 26 S 336th St @ 9th Ave S: Signal MoMications 100,000 100,000 27 S 336th St @ 'st Wy S: Signal Modifications, extend SB L T lane 100,000 100,000 28 SW312th SI: 1st Ave S - SR 509: Widen to 3 lanes 3,775,000 3,775,000 Subtotal Capital Projects 8,526,700 13,344,900 11,451,000 10,822,000 10,142,000 10,411,000 10,980,000 75,677,600 Map 10 NON-MOTORIZED CAPITAL PROJECT LIST 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 I Total I 29 BPA Trail Phase III SW Campus Dr - SW 356th SI: Extend trail 375,000 164,000 1,408,000 1,947,000 30 1st Ave S: S 356th St - S 361st PI: Shoulder improvement 150,000 150,000 31 S 314th SI: 20th Ave S - 23rd Ave S: Install sidewalks 150,000 150,000 32 Weyerhaeuser Way s: S 32Oth St - S 349th SI: Shoulder improvement 652,700 652,700 Subtotal Non-Motorized Capital Projects 375,000 164,000 150,000 1,408,000 150,000 652,700 0 2,899,700 TOTAL CITY EXPENDITURES ** Projects identified in 1995 StreetfTraffic Bond issue. These projects were selected to address safety and congestion in various parts of the City for a total of $7.5 million. Delete from the TIP to derive Arterial Street Improvement Plan (ASIP) Note: Project costs are inflated at 3% per year k:ltrafficltip_cip\2000ltip.wb2 Draft 06 May 1999 Draft 2000 TIP DATE: May 12, 1999 TO: Phil Watkins, Chair Land U serrransportation Committee FROM: Ken Miller, Deputy Public Works Director \6^ SUBJECT: South 320th Street and Pacific Highway South (SR 99) Widening Intersection Improvement Project - 30% Design Approval and BACKGROUND The South 320th Street and SR 99 Widening and Intersection Improvement Project includes adding HOV lanes east and westbound and a second left turn lane on the south, west and east legs of the intersection. The purpose of the project is to improve traffic flow, reduce accidents and promote transit and carpool use. More than 71,800 vehicles use the intersection on a average daily basis and the intersection operates at a level of service F during the mid-day, evening and weekend peak periods; with 193 accidents in the past 3 years. In conjunction with the road project the "Gateway" landscaping will be constructed at the intersection. Three alternatives have been developed based on previous input from the Downtown Revitalization Committee. Drawings and brief descriptions of the alternatives are attached. The project design is approximately 30% complete and right-of-way acquisition has been identified at the intersection. After approval of the 30% design plans, right-of-way acquisition and final design will begin. The 30% complete project plans will be presented by staff at the May 12, 1999 meeting for discussion. RECOMMENDATION Place the following items on the June 1, 1999 Council consent agenda for approval: 1. Approve the 30% design plans for the South 320th Street and Pacific Highway South Widening and Intersection Improvement Project and proceed with final design. 2. Approve a recommended "Gateway" landscape alternative. 3. Authorize staff to proceed with right-of-way acquisition for the project. KM\km cc: Project File Day File CITY OF FEDERAL WAY GATEWAYS AT PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH & SOUTH 320TH GENERAL The central goal of the gateway is to upgrade the appearance of the intersection by providing attractive enhancements at each of the four corners. These Gateway features will make this city hub intersection a visually identifiable place and establish a framework for extending new street improyements (trees, shrubs, sidewalks and lighting) on both Pacific Highway South and South 320th. PUBLIC REVIEW PROCESS Development of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan City Center Element and Street Design Guidelines set the creative process in motion and developed a vision. Open house design review meetings held with City staff, Council members, Consultants, Downtown Reyitalization Committee, business owners and other citizens were conducted March-May, 1998. Statements emerged for desired improvements such as "pedestrian oriented streetscape"; "unified design theme"; "safe, essential vibrant street life"; "provide quality unique landscape plantings"; "consider a water feature"; "try to create a place for structures with gazebo like roofs"; "tie to the city's logo and dark green and blue color system". From these suggestions, three (3) gateway themes have been developed. LANDSCAPE CONCEPT Using the elements of nature-including trees, shrubs, flowers, and large boulders a natural landscape theme is created here. Also, a small trickling water feature is added to the rocks at the Seafirst Corner. Evergreen Cedars, flowering trees, select specimen rhododendrons and other flowering plants are the primary elements in this subtle "Northwest Style" concept. Low WALL CONCEPT A feature of this concept is the highly visible City logo and name located on a panel attached to the low textured color tinted concrete block wall. The wall is 18 to 48 inches high which provides some view softening and backdrop to plantings, which are more formally arranged than the Northwest style landscape concept. Select spots on the low wall are suitable for short-term seating. STRUCTURE CONCEPT Metal shelters and information boards will provide the most unique part of this concept. The roof and structure colors are dark green and blue from Federal Way's color set. A low wall forms a foundation and short-term seating. True 5-6 sided gazebo shapes are not possible due to space constraints but structure angles and roof pitches provide visual interest. Lighting in the structure can proyide highlighting on the City of Federal Way .logo panels and brighten the waiting area for pedestrians at the crosswalks. The structures would be made of painted steel for roofing posts and panels, '- WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE RECREATIONAL PLANNING AND DESIGN 1932 FIRST A VENUE SUITE NUMBER 606 SEATTLE, W ASHINOTON 98101 TEL.206-448-9270 F AX.206-448-0607 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT Federal Way SR - 99 at S. 320th Intersection , . . . Note: Trees shown at mature size 15 years after planting. ~.. ..... WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES I..AND8CAnAIICllrncTI11IE J\ECllEATlONAL PLANNING AND DESIGN 1932 FIRST ^ VENUE. SUITE NUMBER - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 18101 TEL.20tl..Us..1170 P^X.:IOtI-t48-0tI0'7 :f~~~ ...E?~ 1::\' . t;) '~'I ' '.~ ~I \,)1 ~I ÆI .' , . " r:: ~Wl' LANDSCAPE CONCEPT Section A-2 Federal Way SR - 99 at S. 320th Intersection Note: Trees shown at mature size 15 years after Dlantin!!. A ~ .L..""-It>~ ~ .,: f ; ~-: 1 I, i/ ~ I W"'T}:~ FEÞ;t\!f':E"-'.&' :z I I ~-r-s r::> ~I ~ II-Itt> 1!>~-> !!~ ~J ~, 1-:1 )( I ¡.; ." ~ ~ ~I . ~I .' 0 II I, - - -- Jf~t~ 1ti " WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES LAND8CAP1! MICHlnC'!'Uftl! IIEC1II!AT!ONAL PLMIJ'IINO AND D!ZION 1932 FIRST ^ VENUE SUITE N\J:M1!ER 806 """""".'" w~""'..../".,./".... "'M, .,...,. """'-".-9!'Tn "^X.21>11""...oðO7 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT Section S-2 Federal Way. SR - 99 at S. 320th Intersection Note: Trees shown at mature size 15 years after planting. 1 ~I dJl ~I ~I ~I ~ \fI $1 fl - (I )(1 ~I - ~~____~I --J ,.. " WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES 1.A!lD8CAPJ: AIICHmCTI1U UCllEATlONAL I'LAIININO AIID omaN ]982 FIRST.A. VENUE SUITE NUMBER.806 ~"A'M'U' "'.......,.,.......'" 0°'"' ....., -.AAO.O"'" "... -."O.M"" ~I ~ ~. t I 'X ! 111 ~ 7- ~ ~ LANDSCAPE CONCEPT Section W-2 Federal Way SR - 99 at S. 320th Intersection Note: Trees shown at mature size 15 years after planting. 't.. ..... WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES LAHD8CAPt .ARC'HInCTU1lE RECREATIONAl. PLANNINO AND DESION ItS! ylJtST A VENUE SUITE NUMBER 806 SEATTLE. WASHINOTON ISIO1 TEI.,2Oð-HS-lno FAX.208-44S-OðO7 I I ~I \1 ~I ~I I I: ~I ~ ~I ~ ~ r1::"'\~ ~p~ ,/ ~ 1 § ~ LAND S CAPE CONCEPT Section G-2 FederalVVay . SR - 99 at S. 320th Intersection Note: Trees shown at mature size 15 years ')ftpr r,1"...t-;...", . - ¡- "'-'-""---""----"""""-""W...."'- --"'....-.. """"""""""'--------""""--"'~'" DRlVEf'AY:: ¡> "/ ,.. 32ÒthSTREET --;-} :-" TREES -' r ~~E. .. ~ : EVERy 6 STALLS I ; . .1": ~ - I E I ¡ FIRST N I", WW BUSINESS SIQ~.."--.----_.---_..._--,,---,, -------....-----.. "----------- '-------'-----'--..' :~.~: /<~~:;,- )// /----, \ Y'" <>'-, // ""'- // "'- '-'v>/- "'" r WW BUSINESS ""-..// '-"- //~;rGN , ' " >-~ WIDEN \ DRIVEWAY /?»"-i., I ,,' ,,:~.~'-.""--¡~\ ' -,:_;,_-c~~""_:;"~>-Jl- ."" " ",' , ~LOCATE , SE;o\FIRST SIGN i ¡ ~ WW BUSINESS'------------------; "^ ' , ~.:J~- t=t:~ ¡.ow WAIL CASCADiNG VI ATER : ' PEA TuRE OYER LARGE ' . 'BOUlDERS-.nuS - : . . 'CORNERONLY' - 0 . . , . . ./". ~------------' i . . . . " . 0 . . . ok'6'.PLANTERSTRIP. . , . : ~ .. .. ..L' . , . . . , . . .'\.-.-SR.99STREEf , , . : ~"""""CI:.OSE..o.TREES....... '" . D ".. . ...;............,~WAY ~ "" "'" """'0 "'" . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , , . . , , , , , 0 . . . . 0 . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " ..- . , . . . , . . . . , . . . 0 . . . , ~ J , , , . . . . 0 . , , . . . . . . . , . . . , . . . 0 . . ALL FOUR CORNERS :ç . . . " .......,....,...,...... ... .$. .ø# , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . . . . . . . 0 . . . . . . . , . . . . .. """'", "'" DISTINCTIVE COLUMNAR TREES EVERGREEN BACKDROP LARGE BOUIDERS (). Þ 7\ or'..,- / ALL FOUR CORNERS ~ < :.-...-----'----- . r "-'" -4.'); ONE WW ROCK FOR ~ '/~__~~AILFO~.-_.---- ------... ~ . . 0 . . , . . ' , . . . . . ' . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . . . . , . . , . .. .,....... 0 . . ~ . . . . . 0 . . . . . , . '. """""".,. 0 . , . . . . " """""""""" 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . 0 . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . , 0 . . . . . (_.:~:-:--¡._-:---:.o:.~~_...":..~.__._._--~, . t ~={.. "\r ..' '-;::;"':""-'" , . ¡ ¡ ; ///"-----'-'--'-------------"---'o'-----"--~"--"~---Î ¡ ~ ,// \, ()~/ I~r ~ tnl ~ ~¡ °d ~ ~I- ø p, ~ ~ . . . - . ... . ... . . ; . ! . \ ¡ . ¡ :~:'\: " JLæ " J'ilJ \ , ',,: ,I ~. ',::; ," ,'i" - - . IAW:BUSINESS SI~N . . , i ~ lW=4(1-U' I 0 ~- l-----"'----"'-------'-------"'-----"----"'-"'- Ij:--J~ 0' to' 2!J \I:,::¡i! 4(1 ~ ~ ~ U ¡::= Z "B 0 ~ U ~~ rT'1 ~ ~ ~ ~O "". ~~ ~ Q.) ~ < "0 . Q.)rJ) ~~ U ~ en 0; Q L!:¡ ~ ~ rJ'J "" , LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE RECREATIONAL PLANNING AND DESIGN WALL CONCEPT Federal Way' SR - 99 at S. 320th Intersection .. WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES 1932 FIRST A VENUE SUITE NUMBER 606 SEA TTLE, W ASHINOTON 98101 TEL.206-448-9270 F AX.206-448-0607 Note: Trees shown at mature size 15 years after planting. 'I.. ~I ~I ~I Yo Uti " W.ORTHY AND ASSOCIATES LAIID8cAPt AItCHTnCTt11tz It!CII.EATlOHAL I'LAHHlHO AHD DEIIIOH 1932 .I"IJI.s-r A VENUE . SUITE NUMBÈR ðO8 SEATTLE, 'NAIIHINOTC.:'I mol" TE~.S.92'70 I'AX.Joa-HS-OeO'l ~ ~I ~ ~I il ~I ~~ h- L 5~ H\{?1~ \-\þ.\..L.. W! FW ~\~t-\ WALL CONCEPT Section A-2 FederalVVay . SR - 99 at S. 320th lntersectior Note: Trees shown at mature size 15 years after n1antiníT. ~I ~I -I ~ "' ~1 ~I " ~( i' ~I ~I )t' IUI r- waR THY AND ASSOCIATES 1.A!m8CAPt .AIt~1! ItI!CltEATlOIiAL Pl.AHlllIIO AND DI!IIIOII 1132 YlRST A VENUE SUITE NUMBER ðOð SEATTLE. WASHINOTON tIIlðl TEL.20!!-U8-ll'Ið "^X,:()!!..HS-Oe<I7 :1 ~ ~ ~. 'I. W WALL CONCEPT Section 8-2 ~r ~deral Way oJ' SR - 99 at S. 320th Intersection Note: Trees shown at mature size 15 years after planting. '-. I ~I ,,\ ~ -' '1. Uti " waR THY AND ASSaCIA TES LAHD8CAPE AIIClllTl:CTUltZ III!CIIEATIONAL PLANNING AND DEsIGN 1182 FIRST A VÈNUE SUITE NUMBER 8Oð SEATTLE.. WASHINGTON 'SIOI TEL.208.44S.,nO FAx.J08-448-0e0'7. :il 1, ~I ~I ~ ,- - - - - - - - \6' WIDE' VIWf'. ~ D ?l-A t'"E. ~ t1 T. --f f {l ...1 ~ t£+ t B' ~1l1~ \-lbo-\...\- W! FJ.J ~\b,N WALL CONCEPT Section W-2 "Federal Way" SR - 99 at S. 320th Intersectior Note: Trees shown at mature size 15 years after planting. . 1 ~I rÐ I ~I ~ ß ~I ~I . t-. ',. ~I ~ ~~I I ' , I, .....,' ;"""'-, I ...... WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES LANDIICAP'It AIIC!ITI"!C'n!II! IIICIIUTIOHAL PLAHHlHO AKD DESIOH Int FIlUM' A VENUE SUITE NUMBER ðad M:AT'n.E. WASHINO'I'OII geIOI TEL2Oð-HS.9270 FAX.JOtI-I<S.oeo7 1 § , " ~ C-5' \-HI.tH \-l~¡... 1-\( r~ ?\qf4 WALL CONCEPT Section G.2 Federal Way SR - 99 at S. 320th Intersection Note: Trees shown at mature size 15 years "+-¡.,,.. ....1".,..;.,~ ; . !: ,........................................ . DRIVEWA¡Y 1/ ¡ i' """"""""""""""'" ¡. L :~:L: , ~.~. ;, /'>. /// I. i' i i ~ rf"""='-'f'" ",,;~~mbs .¿: II .....,=",=--o-:-.;.-:-'=" """=""=".,,,,,....,1; \. c '" .....CLOSE...,..."..,~~~. DISTINcrrVE : . ~ DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY' . . . . . . . COLUMNAR: ........." """"""'" TREES . , ~ . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . ' . . . . . . . . '. "" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . ' . , . . . ,. "" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ALL FOUR CORNERS BENCH SEAT ATIACHED TO WAlL DISTINCTIVE COLUMNAR TREES FEDERAL WAY SIGN - UPtiGHT EVERGREEN BACKDROP LOW PLANTING IN FRONT OF SIGN .~ . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . :~ ........... . . . ..........,...,....,..~ . . . . . .,#+-' . . . . . . \. :~:~: 1'" . . . , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. ........... ~ . , . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " '.., -+- . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , , . " """""" . . . . , //"~":'~'~'~'~"':"':":"~"":"""~-~'~-~-J': ,....~. '. . =.è. '. """'~'. """"'-"""-"""-"'1-"""'-"""': v. ~......,.-; :'. . r- .......". ~"-.J;;' \... .--- I l' . ' /Y , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . . . . '.. """""""" "" . . . .. . , - . . .. . '" . . .. ' , FREE STANDING 5' HIGH :\ wALL : . i . i .:.,. LOW'BUsINESs SIGN'. ,~i~~' ; 6CALS: 1".4Ø'-Ø" . 0 ~----l"""""""""'.......m............................. .' . ¡ I :.:~ ,..."', ø' IØ' 2Ø' 4Ø' ',,'. i ~ ~ § ~ "B U ~ OJ Z ~~ 0 ~;S C\JO U ~ ('.l OJ('f') ~. ~~~ 0\ 0\ I If ~ , ~ fJJ " LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE RECREATIONAL PLANNING AND DESIGN STRUCTURE CONCEPT Federal Way SR - 99 at S. 320th Intersection WaR THY AND ASSOCIATES 1932 FIRST A VENUE. SUITE NUMBER 606 SEA TILE, WASHINGTON 98101 TEL.206-H8-9270 F AX.206-H8-0607 Note: Trees shown at mature size 15 years after Dlanting. ,.. \ ~\ ":) \\ ¥\ ~\ ..... WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES LAIfCJ8CAPE ARCIIITECTUllIt RECII£ATlONAL PLANNINO AND DESION 19112 FIRST AVENUE SUITE NUMBER 808 SEATTLE. WA!lHlNOTON 88101 TEL.2Oð-H8-92'70 FAX.2Oð-HS-0607 ~l 11 ~\ ~ ~I \ --r 7- ~ .J ~ STRUCTURE CONCEPT Section W-2 Federal Way SR - 99 at S. 320th lntersectior Note: Trees shown at mature size 15 years after planting. I 41 ~I ~I ~ bl ~I 't.. ~I 'f.. Ill ~ (~ D=t: ....... ...... WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES LAND8CAI'I!: AIIClfITBCTUIIE II!CIlEATlONAL PLANNINO AND D!!!ION 1982 FIRB'I' A VENUE SUITE NUMBER 806 ~~ L STRUCTURE CONCEPT Section Á-2 Federal Way SR - 99 at S. 320th Intersectior Note: Trees shown at mature size 15 years ~ftp-T' nhmtinO" I ~I ~I 11 ~I i\/ ~~. ~I - ~ ~I /!íP\ ~ " WORTHY:. AND ASSOCIATES LAIIDIICAn. AIICIIJ'ncTvU UCllZA71OHAL I'LAHHIHO AII'O DI8/OH . iias."R8'Ì"':ÁvÉ!(ür. 8UrnNUMB2R e6e . 8~^'Í'TL2, WA8Hnlo'7'Cis "'0' TEIJOe-448.fJ70 PAX.JOII-44s.:oe<rr , ~P~?Þc ~Þ6E.M~í STRUCTURE CONCEPT Section 8..2 Federal Way SR - 99 at S. 320th Intersection Note: Trees shown at mature size 15 years after planting, f -wr. r ~ y;øVt4ÞlO"Ef!=- . ~ I ~I 1 \ ~ ~I {i ~I ~ ~ ~I f. ~I ~ I 2: § ~I ~l .~ ß ""J ~ '<0. I I . " waR THY AND ASSaCIA TES LMIDSCAI't AIICII1'I'I!:CTtntK IIECIlEATlOIfAL PLAPlNIIfQ AlfD DESIQIf 1992 FIRST ^ VENUE SUITE NUMBER ðOð ~"'A'M't.". WA""'",n.,..", 'D,n, .,..., -_UD_....n "'V"""."D.""",, STRUCTURE CONCEPT Section G-2 Federal Way 'SR - 99 at -8.. 320th Intersection Note: Trees shown at mature size 15 years ....off".. ....1.,"f;,",~ DRIVEWAY ~ ~ ¡¡¡ , ~ ~ ~ ~ u = Z .g 0 ~ u~~ rTl ~ ;S ~ cd 0 ~ ~ C'1 ~('() ~ ~ <1) cI5 ~~ ro E-1 ~ U ~ ~ ~ VJ 1- II I j ! .' ...., ......,..."...... ~ t ' '~:"'~' ¡ REwCA TE SEAFIRST SI< j N ".'.,> , " "~:r'<::~~"> / .-- .-- ~ co- "-"'" ~~ BUS~S +-//// CWSE """-_.,~..,,, DRIVEWAY /\ , - , - - - c..,.........~..........j WW BUSINESS ~: ~.~.~::.r'" ~""TI'~'~'" / '" , ". , '" . WIDEN D RIVEW A ¥........"""........ ALK REWCA TE EXISTING ARCO SIGN , , , , , , , , 4'~ DRIVEWAY . . , , . . , .+-~ , . . . , . . ~~ ALL FOUR CORNERS FLOWERING PEAR TREES , , , . . . . ,¿"" .$ ~ , , , , . , . . . , , , ..¡"" .4 *,Þ ~,~ , , , , . . , OVERHEAD STRUCIURE ON 18" HIGH SEAT WALL "'~. , , , , , . SPECIAL PAVING ~í rJ) ~~"~""~AI:K'-"'" ""'", ; .,.. """""""""""""""'.....................' '//~ /' O~/ ~( ~ ~! tI) :S. (? O' ~ ~: tI) tI) ~ ~. ., ................................. "'.. ~ ~ ~f1,; <;, ,~ : Wi R, " ¡¡ ¡¡¡ .................,... c. . : """ L ~:~, LüWBUSINESs SIGN' . SCALE:! 1"=4Ø'-Ø" 1\..[111111111,,' . 0 .,;. c'.: ø' IØ' 2Ø' 4Ø' . CITY OF - 8- : EJ:J~ ~~~ DATE: May 13, 1999 TO: Phil Watkins, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee FROM: Ken Miller, Deputy Public Works Director ~ SUBJECT: South 320th Street Underground Conversion Agreement with Puget Sound Energy BACKGROUND On September 16, 1997, the City Council approved a $856,300.00 expenditure for undergrounding oyerhead power and telephone lines on So 320th Street from 1-5 to 11 th Place So. This cost includes $791,300.00 for Puget Sound Energy (PSE) and $65,000.00 for U.S. West Communications. The City has been working with PSE, and due to the siting of Sound Transit facilities and priyate work along the corridor, the conyersion will be split into three phases, Phase One Gatewav Center - Estimated Cost (see attached) $151,500.00 100% tariff applies (Note: Above cost does not include relocating or undergrounding of existing switching equipment as requested by Dan Casey) Phase Two from 20th Avenue So to 11th Place So - Estimated Cost 3,900 LF x $103.20 per LF - 30% tariff applies $402,480.00 Phase Three from 20th Avenue S. to Gateway Center - Estimated Cost 1,600 LF x $204 per LF - 100% tariff applies $326,400.00 Total Estimated Cost $880,380.00 The $880,380.00 estimated cost for PSE to underground their facilities along So 320th Street is 11 % over the original estimate. As the yarious project phases are constructed, the trenching and restoration that is estimated at $60 per linear foot could be reduced and as a result, sayings could be realized by combining this work with other street improvement projects. RECOMMENDATION Forward the following staff recommendation to the full City Council for consideration at its June 1, 1999 meeting: 1. Approye executing an agreement with PSE for $151,500.00 for undergrounding the power lines adjacent to Gateway Center along So 320th Street. 2. Approye of the staff recommendation to not include undergrounding of switching equipment due to project budget constraints. K: \LUTC\1999\UNDERGRD. WPD +PUGET SOUND ENERGY November 30, 1998 Mr. Ken Miller, P .E. City of Federal Way Street Systems Manager 33530 1 st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003-6221 Re: Gateway Underground Conversion PSE work order number 101001814 Dear Ken, Puget Sound Energy will underground that portion of S 320th St. in front of Gateway Center as indicated on the enclosed work sketch # 101001814. The estimated cost of this construction, includihg PSE perfonning the excavation, is $179,518.00. Actual cost will be billed to the City at the conclusion of the project. As requested, the following estimate includes the trenching and road crossings. It is my understanding that after reviewing this estimate and subsequent bids from the City's contractors you will notify me if you would like PSE to complete the trenching and road crossings portion of the project. $ 24,640.00 Trenching (along Marriott frontage and in the Pier One Imports parking lot, cost includes $3300 for cement and asphalt removal/replacement and $5500.00 for select backfill). $ 34,878.00 Street crossings (1-5 offramp, Gateway Blvd., S. 320th St. and BP's driveway entrance) $ 120,000.00 Engineering, conduit and electrical equipment installation $ 179,518.00 Total The cost shown above for "Engineering, conduit and electrical equipment installation" includes the total underground switch. The cost difference between the total underground and the pad mounted switch is approximately $17,000.00. The cost increase of setting the switch where it is shown on the sketch versus installing it on the northeast comer of S. 320th St. and Gateway Blvd. is approximately $11,000.00. f"uQet SOlIlld Enmç;y. 111(; 2?¿VQ :;')'JII1 # ,Q2 . I\el" WA 98032 ~ Page 2 Mr. Ken Miller November 30, 1998 If everything above and on the enclosed work sketch meets with your approval, please sign and return this letter along with one copy of the sketch, also signed and dated with the City's purchase order number as indication of your acceptance. If you have any questions, please contact me in our Kent Service Center at 253-395-6930. ~ Dan L. Swan Project Manager Major Projects Accepted by: Printed Name: Date: enclosures DATE: May 11, 1999 TO: Phil Watkins, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee Ken Miller, Deputy Public Works Director '?-tJ\ FROM: SUBJECT: 23rd Avenue South (South 317'h Street to South 324'h Street) Road Improvements - Update BACKGROUND This project widens 23rd Avenue South to fiye lanes, two lanes in each direction with a two way left turn lane, from South 317th Street to South 324th Street. The Sea Tac Mall entrance will be aligned with South 322nd Street, and signals will be installed at South 322nd and at South 317th Streets, with decoratiye lighting and landscaping installed in accordance with the City Center Street Design Guidelines. Twelye foot sidewalks with wheel chair ramps will be added to both sides of 23rd Avenue South. The design phase of the 23rd A yenue South (South 317th Street to South 324th Street) Road Improyement Project is complete. Right of way acquisition has begun with offers being made to property owners, This project is funded through final design, right of way acquisition, and construction. As a part of the Value Engineering study and based on current traffic analyses, the intersection of 23rd Avenue South and South 320th Street is at level of service "F," or failing. This is mainly due to the number of left turns from South 320th Street to southbound 23rd A yenue South. This intersection will be further impacted with additional traffic and congestion from the two new hotels currently under construction as well as the proposed Sound Transit improyements located north of So 320th and adjacent to 23rd Avenue So. The City is currently acquiring right of way and will be relocating the traffic signal on all four corners of the intersection as a part of the original 23rd Avenue So project, and as such, it would be more efficient, timely, and cost effectiye to construct the South 320th Street double left turn project (which is on the City's Six Year Transportation Improyement Plan) and 23rd A venue So project simultaneously. To this end, staff applied to the Transportation Improvement Board for funding of the combined projects and was successful in being awarded $1,000,000 towards the total cost of $2,586,400. Combining the projects will increase the total estimated project cost from $6,134,020. to $8,720,420. Proposed funding sources for the remaining expanded project costs are shown on the attachments. Staff will be present at the meeting to present the information and answer questions. RECOMMENDATION Place the informational memo on the June 1,1999 Council Consent agenda. KM:jg Attachment K:\LUTC\1999\23RDA VES.WPD FUNDING SOURCES FUND SOURCE DESIGN ROW CONSTRUCTION TOTAL ORIGINAL SCOPE I COSTS (23RD AVENUE SOUTH IMPROVEMENTS) UATA Funds $3,680,800 $3,680,800 ISTEA $289,775 $418,975 $708,750 King Co. Transit $30,000 $30,000 City of Federal Way $201,600 $592,670 $920,200 $1,714,470 Total $521,375 $1,011 ,645 $4,601 ,000 $6,134,020 PROPOSED SCOPE / COST INCREASE (23RD AVENUE SOUTH I SOUTH 320TH STREET DOUBLE LEFT TURN LANES) UATA Funds $154,480 $250,340 $595,180 $1,000,000 Sound Transit (Proposed $500,000 $500,000 Mitigation) Ouandrant (Established $273,700 $273,700 Mitigation) . City of Federal Way $82,720 $134,060 $595,920 $812,700 Total $237,200 $384,400 $1,964,800 $2,586,400 Grand Total (1) $758,575 $1,396,045 $6,565,800 $8,720,420 NOTE: (1) Total Project cost for original 23rd Avenue South Improvements and addition of 23rd Avenue South / South 320th Street double left turn lane projects. k:\streets\projects\23rd\1 utctbl. wb2 Typical RoadwaySeG~jon 6'* 120' ---"==-~~~:=-:~~:~:=-=~~=:=------ f t I 112' LANE 1. MEDIAN j' 12' LANE 1 (WHERE LT NOT NEEDED) 12' LANE {11' LANE {'11' LANE ~11' LANENtí 12' LANE ~2'I..ANE 1111 LAN~ 12' LANE HOV LEFT TUR LEFT TURN HOV c~ --r ;:;:::::::¡:; ~ PLANTER ~ * ROW or easement may be needed South 320th Street ~1TY0f' . c::=.. ~~ ~ERRL c: 0 .- I . CO N .- CD c: c: CO ..c:: '0 Z 1 ....\.......... "....... ._O .. I...... I- :. <:( ..:N :111\', . ,[j ,lli,lI,., Z '-.:;" ~, ,,=-';;: ~ . ! lr It .' I '(I g . ,,:,1111;, ~ !¡lfl! 0 .1, ! . a.. 0 a: a. ..c +-' 0 C\J cry ! ¡I , II' . I i ¡ ¡I "ill ~ III'F ;,:. ,It !< I ;¡; ~ ;:}