LUTC PKT 07-06-1998
",
City of Federal Way
City Council
.. Land UserI'ransportat.ion Committee
, ,
^^. ~ " ",.)'"
.July 6, 199~'"
;5:30 pìri<>~,:'
"
City Hall"
Council Chambers
,
MEETING AGENDA
1.
CALL TO ORDER
2.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3.
PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes)
4.
COMMISSION COMMENT
5.
BUSINESS ITEMS
A
Weyerhaeuser 10% Annexation Petitions
B.
School Impact Fees
Action Michaelsonll0 min
Action Moore/l0 min
Action Pratt/l0 min
C.
SeaTac Phase I (Belmor) Authority to Award
the Rebid
6.
FUTURE MEETING AGENDA ITEMS
Surface Water Management/Department of Ecology
Ordinance Package
Open Cut of ROW vs Boring
Comprehensive Plan Update
Non Residential Design Guidelines
Adult Entertainment RegUlations
Land Use Permit Fees
7.
ADJOURN
Committee Members:
Phil Watkins, Chair
Jeanne Burbidge
Mary Gptes
I:\LU- TRANS\JUL6LUT.AGN
City Staff:
Greg Moore, Director. Community Development SeIVices
Sandy Lyle, Administrative Assistant
253.661.4116
"""""""""""""""""""""".'" :
....' ,
.-
SUMMARY
In :ltft".M.mr.e: Committ,..e memberS Phil Watkins (Chair), Mary ~ and Jeanne Bwbidge; Council Member Linda Kocbmar;
Public Works Director Ca1y Roe; Deputy Director of Community Development Services Kathy McClung; Assistant City
Attorney. Bob Sterbank; Surface Water Manager Jeff Pratt; Traffic F.rtgin~r Rick Perez; Street Systems Manager Ken Miller;
SWManaglmleDt Project Fngjn,..er Ma.rwan Salloum; Administrative Assistant Sandy Lyle.
1. CALL TO ORDER ,
The meeting was called to order at 5:35pm by Chairman Phil Watkins.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the June I, 1998, meeting were approved as presented.
3. PUBUC COMMENT
There was no public coounent on any non-agenda items.
4. COMMISSION COMMENT
There was no addùional comment from any of the City Commissions.
5. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. Shoreline Ma..<;ter Pro~ -The Committee mlslc recomtnl"-ndation of approval of the Shoreline Master Program to the
City Council with :lmI".MmPJ:)ts. The Committee requested the deletion ofmateria1 concerning commercial forests.
Federal Way bas no commercial forests. Another Slml".Mmevt extends the cu.rreot 20 foot setback for single family to a
minimnm setback of 50 feet or as detP-nninffl by the extension of a string line, whichever is greater. For IPtJltiVimi1y
and commercial consttuction. the setback was set at 75 feet or the string 1ine method. wbic.bevcr is greater. For
nonconforming structures created by a cbange in this code, no eocroachmeot into the setback Will be allowed. Additions
and remodel work DD1St go up, out, or back. . The Committee stated that access can be visual as well as physical and
eliminated a bonus to commercial properties for access to shorelines.
'B. Six Year TIP - The 6-year TIP and ASIP respond to Growth Management Act concurrency requirements and the 20-
year CIP allows the City to plan for transportation system needs to the 2O-year planning horizon. The proposed plans
do not significantly differ from the previous year's plans. Six new projects have been added to the 6-year TIP and
ASIP. The Committee believed the SW 3 12th Street project from Dash Point Road to 1st Avenue S to be significant
and moved it from the CIP into the TIP. Committ~ mlslc recomm"Mation of approval of the six year TIP, as
amended, to the City Council at their July 7, 1998, meeting.
C. Street Tree policylRight of Way Vegetation Maintenance - Based upon infonnation provided by staff to the Committee
and in the absence of a current Street Tree Policy, the Committee proposed a 16-year ~ replacement policy, a street
tree TIP. This new capital replacement program would fall under the broad heading of City. Manager Ordered
Maintenånce. In addition to this budgeted item. future overlay projects would include a 2 % provision for the
replacement of s~t trees. It was also noted that current levels of maintenance were satisfactory and should not be
reduce<J.
D. Star Lake & Military Road 100% Desien ApJ)rovallAuthorization to Bid - The Committee mls/c recommendation
approval to the Council of the final design plans for the Military Road South at Star Lake Road Signalization Project.
...,.,.".""""""'"
,.. ...------.--.-,..............-........-...-............
Bids will be brought directly to the City Council for award of the COnstIUctio~ contract ifbids received are within
budget. .
E. South 304th Street & Milita¡y Road Street & Traffic SifWI11nwmveJlV'.nts lOO~ De.<;ign Awroval & Authorization'to
Bid - The South 304th Street and Mi1itary Road Improvement Project was funded as a part oftbc 1995 voter approved
bond issue. This project will installIeft turn Janes and an aspbaIt shou,1der on Military Road and Sooth 3O4th Street at
the intersections. A lowered roadway will also improve sight distance. 'Ibis 1995 voter-approved bond project is
estimated to be approximateÌy $28,500 over the available budget., The project was previously split into two projects
wben it was learned that a Shoreline Pconit was required for tile South 3O4th Street phase. The change required
additional design, pJans and spec.i1icatioos for tile second phase. Staff reootn111l".l1ds bidding the project asprescnted and
reducing tile 10% contingency of $71,000 to 6% or $42,600 to baJance tbc budget. If the bids are over the 6%
available contingency, the project will be brought back to Committee and Council for review and approval. The "
Committee mls/c recommendation of approval to the City Council at the July 7, 1998, Council meeting as amended
F. 14th Avenue SW & SW 312th Street Pede.múm Walkway Tnwrovl".mMf'!ll00"Design AppmvallAnthnri7'JItion to Bid - .
The design of the SW 312th Street/14th Avenne SW Pedestrian Walkway Project was completed. . Plans are being
reviewed by 'the Federal Way Fire Department and the Fedem1 Way ,School DistriCt. Cost of-the project is estimatedat.
, ~'l13,OOO including cost for construction and project administration. Sudget consists of $48,OOO.TIB grant, with a
$12.000 grant match budgeted in 1997, and $53,000 from the 1998 Streets Structures Operations budget. The
Coll1lllÍttee-'mls/c recommPnðatino. of approval to CooDci1 at tbcir July 7, 1997, meeting. Once authorized to bid the
project. staff will take bids directly to Council for award.
G. Joe's Creek Water Ouality MonitorinV Station 100" Design Approval/Authorization to Bid - Included in the 1998
Surface Water Management Division's Minor Capital Improvemcot Program are Water Quality Improvement and Lake
and Stream Restoration projects. ODe of these projects is tbc Joe's Creek Flow Control StrUCture, which is necessary
to provide a stable stream cbam1e1 for monitoring stream flow. This project originally was scheduled to come before
the Commi~ in 1996 requesting approval to award an aoticlp8ted bid. Nope was received possibly due to the
difficulty of access to the project location and the type of construction. The design of the facility bas been modified to
simplify construction because of the access problems. The Committee mlslc recomml".ndabon of approval of the design
to tile Council and recommended tile authorization of obtaining bKls from the Public Works Small Works Roster.
H. :;W 34Oth Street RetrionaI Storm Water Control Facility Authorization to Award Bid - The City received seven rebids
from contractors for the SW 34Oth Street Regional Storage Facility. Lowest bidder was Scoccolo Constnlction, Inc..
with a-total bid amount of $723,103. The Committ,..e mIsIc recomml".JVt1 tion of approval to the City Council at the June
16,1998, meeting. of the contract to Scoccolo Constmction with a 10% contingency of $72.310. '
L Vacuum Jet Rodding ServiceslBid Award Authorization - Bids for Vacuum/Jet Rodding Service were solicitØ for a
base unit of work in order to provide a basis for comparison of bids received. Council bas authorized the expenditnre,
of $178,500 for the service in the 1998 budget. The Committee mlslc recomml".ndation of approval of award of the
contract to the low bidder. The low bid unit prices will be used to pay for services provided up to an amount not to
exceed $178,500. "
6.. FUTURE MEETINGS
The next meeting will be held on July 6, 1998, at 5:30 pm.
7. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 7:35pm.
I:\LU- TRANS\IUN15LUf .SUM
SUMMARY
In attendance: Committee members Phil Watkins (Cbair)~ Mary Gates and Jeanne Burbidge; Council Members Linda
Kochmar; Director of Community Development Services Greg Moore; Public Works Director Cary Roe; Deputy Director of
Co~ Development Services Kathy McClung; Assistant City Attorney Bob Sterbank; Surface Water Manager Jeff Pratt;
SWManagement Project F.ngjnl".l".t Marwan Salloum; Senior Planner Jim Harris; Administrative Assistant Sandy Lyle.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting wås called to order at 5:35pm by O\;Jinn:ln Phil Watkins.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
. The mimltes of the June 1, 1998, meeting were approved as presented.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no public comment on any non-agenda items.
4. COMMISSION COMMENT
There was no additional comment from any of the City Commissions.
5. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. Shordine Master Program. - Staff presented the Shoreline Master Program as aJDl"nded. most of which was originally
derived from King County Shoreline Master Program and Regulations. The Committee comtnl"-nted and asked
questions and isolated specific topics tbey wisbed to <liscuss further at their June 15, 1998, meeting. Those items
include physical can:ying capacity, jmpervious surface, commercial forests, biophysical1imitations, application of
shorelines designations, shorelines setbacks, setbacks for commercial properties, and pavement'in residential
subdivisions. .
B. Code Amendment Reqpe.'!t from Roger Hyppa re: 1816 South 34Oth - Roger Hyppa, a former Federal Way resident and
currently a resident of Lake Forest Park, owns a house at 1816 South 34Oth. Recently he inquired about selling it and
learned that the property is zoned Business Park. He claims, and the five neighbors concur, there was never any
notification of the change in zoning from the previous residential zoning. He has two potential buyers for his property
but because neither would be allowed to modernize the property under the current non-conforming provisions of the
zoning code, he fears he will be unable to sell. He believes that rezoning of the property has devalued it. The
Committee mls/c addition of Mr. Hyppa's concerns to the proposed 1998 Planning Commission Work Program.
C. South 356th RSF Final Accq>tance - 'the South 356th Storm Water Control Facility project has been completed. The
contractor is now requesting release of the retaiuage associated with the projec,t. Prior to release' of retainage on a
Public Works project, the City Council must accept the work as complete to meet State Department of Revenue and
State Department of Labor and Industries requirements. The final construction cost was $1,741,561.39 which was
$171,010.23 below the approved construction contract budget of$I,912,571.62. The Committee mls/c
recommendation of acceptance to the City Council of the South 356th RSF as complete.
D. SeaTac Phase I (6elmor)Authority to Award Bid - The Committee mls/c recommendation to the City Council at its June
16, 1998, meeting to award the bid to Stan Palmer Construction, Inc., with a low bid amount of $1,426,937.56 to
'" ,..,.'~...
""""". """':.':::'.".",""""""""""""""""""""""""""~""""',"",.,.,.,.
._"",."...."",,~,.~-
construct the SeaTac Phase I (Belmor) project. The Committ~ recoml11l'.f)(btion included a budget amendment in the
amount of $173,875.31. and. the establishment ofa 10% construction contingency in the amount of $142,693.76.
E~ . Crown Point Storm Sewer Re,pair . Damage to the Crown Point subdivision storm sewer line was discovered last
winter. The separation of the storm line allowed water to escape from the system and undermine the storm line down
slope of the break as well as a nearby sanitary sewer line owned by the Lakebaven Utility District., Emergency repairs
were completed earlier this year. The permanent repair project design has reached the 30 % completion point. The
Committee mlslc recomml".M1ItÏon of approval to the City Council at its June 16, 1998, meeting. Staff will again
present the project before the Committee at the 85 % design stage.
F. Redondo Riviera - Mr. Moore presented information on the Redondo Riviera Annexation by Des Moines. The Cities '
of Federal Way and. Des Moines negotiated Potential AJlQ,..xation Area (P AA) boundaries in 1994. The annexation of
that portion of the P AA 1co.own as the Redondo Riviera has generated issues with the Boundary Review Board (BRB). '
Some property owners do not want their property split in such a way that part is located in Federal Way and part is
located in Des Moines. and Iaised the issue to the BRB. The BRB scbeduled a modification hearing that may result in
vioJating the PAA Interlocal Agreement between the Cities of Federal Way and Des Moines. The Committee .
recomml".ooed'the discussion of the options in executive sessiÒn at the.June 2, 1998, City Council meeting, due to
'pOtentia11itigation. . '
G. PAA Pre-Annl"..xation Comprehl".Ì1~ive Plannin~ and Zonin~ - The Committee previously requested staff to research
costs, time lines and. scope of work for a pre-annexation program and to report back. To prepare this information
would require hiring of consultants in the range of $7 ,000. The Committee mlslc bringing this matter forward to the
City Council at the June 2, 1998, meeting when they discuss the 1998 PJanning Commission Work Program.
6. FUTURE MEETINGS
The next meeting will be held on June 15, 1998, at 5:30 pm.
7. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 7:20pm.
I:\LU -TRANS\JUNILtrr.SUM
CrTY OF FEDERAL WAY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNfTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
JUNE 29, I 998
TO:
CfTY COUNCIL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
FROM:
LORI MICHAELSON. SENIOR PLANNER
SUBJECT:
WEYERHAUSER NOTICES OF INTENTION TO PE1lll0N FOR ANNEXATION
CITY FILE NOS. ANN98-000 I AND ANN9S-o002
On'May 27, 1998, the City of Federal Way received two Notices of Intention
to Petition for Annexation, from the Quadrant corporation, a Weyerhauser
Company (see exhibit A). The notices constitute the 10% petition stage
of the direct petition method of annexation under state law (RCW
35A.14.120). since the notiGes involve separate geographic areas of the
City, they have been assigned separate application numbers. However, both
notices will be processed concurrently, as addressed in this report.
For City council consideration of the proposal, staff has-compiled the
following information: (A) Description of Proposed Annexations; (B)
Annexation Process; (C) Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designations; (D)
Annexation Analysis; (E) Council Action Required and Staff Comments; and
(F) Staff Reco~endation.
A.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ANNEXAllONS
As petitioned, Area 1 (#ANN98-0001)is comprised of 18.34 acres and
is situated north of South 320th Street. Area 2 (#ANN98-0002) is
comprised of 18.42 acres and situated north of SR-18 and'south of
South 334th Street. ,Refer to Exhibit B for a map of both annexation
areas in relationship to City boundaries, along with a parcel-based
spreadsheet showing total ownership information, tax parcel sizes,
and land values. Also refer to Exhibits C and D for Area 1 and Area
2 boundary maps, respectively; along with parcel-based spreadsheets
for each. Current and proposed zoning designations, from King County
to Federal Way, are also noted on individual area maps. You will
note that Area 1 boundary maps and spreadsheet address the potential
inclusion of the fire district property within the annexation
boundaries. The fire district property is not included in the
annexation as petitioned, and its potential inclusion is reviewed in
E., below.
B.
ANNEXAllON PROCESS
state law provides for six different methods of annexation. As with
the previous Weyerhauser and Enchanted Park annexations, the Quadrant
1
c.
annexation petition will utilize the direct petition method,
outlined below:
as
(1)
The applicant meets with city Officials and staff to discuss
the annexation process and the boundaries of the area to be
annexed.
(2)
The first petition called the Notice of Intention to Petition
for Annexation (10% petition level) is prepared and circulated
by the applicant'among all affected property owners. (Note:
Under the petition method, state law requires the petitioner(s)
to be the owner(s) of no less than ten percent in value of the
property to be annexed. As certified by King County (Exhibit
E), Weyerhauser is the owner of all property contained within
'. "the annexa tion areas as peti tioned.)
(3) After the signatures on the petition are validated and found
.. sufficient by the City Clerk, the city Council holds a meeting.
(4)
The city council decides whether to accept the proposed
annexation, and if so, under what conditions. This is the
current: point:' in the 'D:r:oc:ess. Rerer t:o E.. and F.. be~O'W. ror
Counci~ Action Required and SrATr Recommendations.
(5)
If the City council accepts the Notice of Intent, a second
petition (60%) is prepared for the applicant to circulate in
the proposed annexation area.
( 6)
After the signatures on the second petition are validated and
found sufficient, the required public hearings on the 60%
petition, proposed zoning and comprehensive plan designations,
are scheduled at least 30 days apart.
(7)
At the conclusion of the public hearings, staff prepares the
Notice of Intention to Annex and appropriate accompanying
information to, the King County Bounqary Review' Board. The
Boundary Review Board holds a public meeting to decide if the
annexation proposal should be approved.
If the Boundary Review Board approves the annexation, the 'City
prepares an annexation ordinance. The annexation area becomes
part of the city of Federal Way when the ordinance is adopted.
(8)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS
Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Article III, Annexation, provides for
three options for establishing zoning and comprehensive plan
designations for annexed areas. However, consideration of these
options by the city Council is not required in response to the
notices, since zoning and comprehensive plan designations for tpe
annexation'areas are currently under review as part of the city's
annual update of the comprehensive plan. Comprehensive plan and
zoning designations for the annexation areas are expected to be
2
established through the update process. The comprehensive plan
update is currently under review by the Planning Commission and is
expected to be brought before City Council sometime in August, 1998.
In the unlikely event that 'the update is not completed prior to a
final decision on the annexation by Council (at the 60% petition
stage), staff would notify Council of actioQs available to resolve
the issue at that time.
As proposed in the comprehensive plan update, the Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) designation for Annexation Area 1 (#ANN98-
0001) is Multi-Family, and proposed zoning is RM-3600 (1 dwelling
unit per 3,600 square feet of land area; 12 DU's per acre). For
Annexation Area 2 (#ANN98-0002), the proposed comprehensive plan
designation is Single Family-High Density, and proposed zoning is RS-
9600(1 dwelling unit per 9,600 square feet of land area; 4 DU's per
acre).. As petitioned, and as reflected on Exhibits C and D, zoning
for the annexation areas is consistent with the comprehensive plan
updates under review at this time.
D.
ANNEXAllON ANALYSIS
If the Council accepts the 10% petition and authorizes circulation
of the 60% petition, several issues will be examined for Council
consideration. These include a cost/benefit analysis of the
annexation in te~s of revenue generated by the properties and uses
in the area, versus the cost of providing City services. other
issues include land use, surface water, site access, street network
and circulation. City staff from finance, planning, public works,
parks, and police, will fo~ a team to perfo~ the analysis. A
report on the analysis, and final actions required, will be presented
to the City Council at the 60% petition stage of annexation.
E.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED AND STAFF COMMENTS
Pursuant to stat,e law, the City Council must decide whether to accept
Weyerhauser's intention to annex, and if so, under what conditions.
Specifically, Council members must act on the following decision
points at the Council meeting. Staff comments ~re provided.
t/
Whether or not the city will accept, reject, or geographically
modify annexation areas as proposed.
city council can modify annexation boundaries at either the 10%
or 60% petition meetings as determined appropriate. The
annexation analysis prepared by staff for the 60% petition
meeting will include the boundaries directed by City Council at
the 10% petition meeting.
As petitioned, the annexation boundaries for Area 2 are
recommended for acceptance by City Council. However, the
boundaries for Area, :t should be modified to include the King
County Fire District parcel located at 3700 South 320th. This
recommendation is consistent with the fire district's previous
and current requests (see Exhibit F).
3
,~""""",~~""""",,"""'L"""""~""""""" '
.
V'
F.
Under the comprehensive plan update, proposed comprehensive
plan and zoning designations for the fire district parcel are
consistent with the Area 1 annexation area as petitioned, i.e.,
Multi-Family Residential/RM-3600. Multi-family zoning under
City Code does allow for fire stations (as government
facilities) .
V'
Whether the ci ty will require the simul taneous adoption of
interim or initial comprehensive plan and zoning map
desi gna ti on.
As previously noted, comprehensive plan updates are expected to
precede the 60% petition meeting of city Council. However,
staff recommends that Council establish this requirement in'
. order to document the City's intent to adopt comprehensive plan
and zoning designations prior to or concurrent with the
'ånnexation. Accordingly, staff will ensure that Council is
advised of alternatives in this regard should the comprehensive
plan amendments not be approved within the expected timeframe.
Whether the Ci ty will require the assumption of all or any
portion of exisiting city indebtedness by the area to be
annexed.
staff recommends that all annexations be required to assume a
proportionate share of the City's outstanding bond debt. This
is consistent with previous annexations. The city's total
outstanding bond indebtedness as of April 30, 1998, is
$39,845,000.
STAFF RECOMMENDA1l0NS
Staff recommends the following:
(1)
The City Council accept the 10% petition for annexation as
proposed, with boundaries modified as recommended, and
authorize the circulation of the 60% petition;
(2)
The City Council require p~e-annexation comprehensive plan and
zoning designations, or alternatively, simultaneous adoption of
such designations.
(3)
The City Council require assumption of proportionate share of
bonded indebtedness as a matter of policy.
Attached Exhibits
A
B
C
D
E
F
Applicant's Notices of Intention to Petition for Annexation
Area Wide Annexation Map and Parcel-Based Spreadsheet
Area 1 Boundary Map and Parcel-Based Spreadsheet
Area 2 Boundary Map and Parcel-Based Spreadsheet
Annexation Petition Certification
Letter to Greg'Moore from Jim Hanlilton, fire district admlnistr.ator
1:lm\.nnex/we!8~lutc.mem
4
-~-~~~~~-~""~--"r""-'---~"'" ".~.., "'U""~'>""":""""""~-"""""""'""""'-""""
, '-"-" ........, ' ... ..... ,.., .....'.. ..
QUADRANT
A Weyerhaeuser Company
MJft"'IIBECEIVED BY
"'-"fJIVIVI'CU T DEVElOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Mff 27 am
.
Quadrant Plaza, Suite 500
H.E. 8th at 112th
P.O. Box 130
Bellewe. Washington 98009
Tel (425) 455 2900
Fax (425) 6468300
May 26, 1998
Mr. Greg Moore, Director
Department of Community Development
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
33530 1st Way S
Federal Way, W A 98003
RE:
Notice of Intention to Petition for Annexation
Dear Greg:
With this letter we are filing two executed Notices of Intention to Petition for Annexation
within the City of Federal Way. The petitions apply to the following two Weyerhaeuser
Real Estate Company owned properties: ' .
1.
2.
Property located immediately north of South 320th Street
Property located to the south of South 334th Street
These petitions are consistent with the changes previously proposed to the
Comprehensive Plan for the same properties.
Please advise on the next steps in the annexation process. Thank you for your attention
to this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at 425-646-8352.
Sincerely,
\
THE QUADRANT CORPORATION
~~
Susan G. Heikkala
Vice President
Commercial Division
Enclosures
. .....~"
",-
'-"';"-1
, EXHIB,IT
PAGEL OF
'------..
"'.."H-
"'.a.~
(
.
. ,
CEl I
,AMENDED ,RE~vRD 'OF SURVËY
A PORTION OF' TH'e: '$W :'1/4, 'OF' SECTION 1O, TVVP. 21 N;, RGE; 4
'. KING' COUNiY, WASHINGTON .
, ,
E., W.M.
'D
~~ ,~ ~~I
TIIACTJ , IItOCUOH 7, AHO TN47 ~ 0' ntACr 18 L- SOUIH 01' IH£ 8CINNMJ.I; , '. LeGAl. -ncH. WWEllf$, ~ --. AND -- I0IO( -- ~
- -- IOCHT 0' WA!, AS m- ... CAsOIÐß' _0 UNDU CHICACO idLe INSINHCt cow- - 110. _I - - II, III" nu. o.c. ae-
I~ -au »<'081, -.. --- IIIACtJ. - TO IIC 1'1.\1 1MOIrO', lIAS - SDU:I,'I ON "" IIUOII'.. fill --- 0' fill_.
le- .. - # 01' 1'1.\1$, ~AGC 40, II - CO\INf'I, -- 2. fill - 0' - - TN47 IICcooci 0' - ... au. INC. FUll UNOø
c:rctn ÞC SOUtH UD I'ttr 01' ntACr 7; , , * I 110, t007211OO7. fHC EAS'DII.Y - FIlII ÞC COIfÞuN( 0' SOUIH 3ZDn1 -
- excrn ...., ""'- 01' IIIAØS I AHO 7 - ro fHC STArt 01 W- ... ST~ -C11.Y - OS 8(100 7HC SOUIH GIWIIDI -, 01 Stc""" 'II. ~
geto 11(- - -- --- '"asl7, J. M.I£C7 ro ~- CONr...m II SolID I'IA' I '110 lOr 011 ~ 0' < lOr ..
- rxc:rn ÞC SOUIM 40 rea 01' nucr , COINt'tCO ro tHe SI<rt 01' W_IDH ... INS 1'1.\1 -.. 8C _0 AND tOI.O 011 JICtOU 011 - CIW«D 011 '_UJICD .
ortO Ir- UNOU Ir- -w "'WI¡ , . ~ ~ ~ 01 - -o,r fIII~~r~ ~~ ., -..
~_~!!"...fHC SOUtH 40 I'ttr 01 ntACr " OS -- - KINO COUNn' ~ If ntlS 1'1.\1 MC a~ II$(. co.c.c ... 1ICmC~,~ CIIII8¡
._, -- -1(1 S74MI, rJ AND IICGII.A- 01 - ",. - - SUISDIUOI7 CIWICCS IUoDC OJ
»10 þccpr fHC SCUIM 40 'ta 01 fill war 100 01 nucr S - ro THe SfA7C 0( tÆ - - ' - IY - COUNIY aCSOI.\If1ON. ,
wA$I<IHÇ1DH rr OrEO"rcooooco - IC- _,U "'..20, ' ~~~~~~I ~ '::;:::, t, SUI.ICCf ro ÞC IIICHI 01 IMr I'U8UC ro IWCC N(CU!All' SI.OI'CS roo curs -IUS W
~~ ....\ - 1 uPON SAID -.cs If IHr I~ -.... - 01 trlltClS, A\IDIUCS, ..uI'S - ~
' ' , ~t. ~ ~ ~""'." , - AS -'to .. IN( 1'\.41, "
' . ~ ~ ~~..." i. i " SWlCC7 TO ... EASE- - -- ~- - ro PUCP - - IIIpII CJ
\ -,,0 t )t.",," tt'lld' A AND UGHr C!!':~.!-~o UNDU R~ 110. "ems. 1HC I.OCAfION 01' nos EASCWCN7 \ . mAs
",,\I.'ÿI"¡;" ...., .,,\-:,-:"" )\:1' ¿fY'~ - 8C -,--- 'lIOII lit( ...,- 0I1ItCO!'D. ' ~.
. ICVNO COHCICIC UONUUtHr ~" I .¡. , ÿ ",,"".. SWJCC7 ro ..... CIoSEI/CNI - -IONS CONr- - ro PUCP - 'DWU
'f'O - WlIM -001 OWD ,<!,"¡s' "" "" - UGHI (f:JIØ-, rI,'.IIlINOCa II(~ NO. ,'as587, fHC IOCAfION 01' IIOS fASCUCHr 100 so 0 lOO~ Zn:
" C"'... lllO .p ./ ~\)' .~01 ,- - - ~ _r It or'rR-£o IROU rM( ..._r O/f aeCDllO. " .
... , ,.d~c1I ---::ni-~ 1> ~~, , ./ ",¡ t, "",,"r TO ... ~EWCHI - -- ~- - TO ""'0 COUNtY WAIDI 80AU! : T'. .
In.l o'.~1 .-~ "" Yr' ,'i' '7 ......- ",,"", -IOCr 110. " '011' STDJ. WATDt ""', ruo UNDU ~ lIDS. "t7070 - 'S7..... '
:': ""'~:¡-.,o./ ," w./ ""'; w 'S DnCIIIICO If SAID ..."""'tHT, nor CCHIOIUN( 01' 7HC WAIDI ..... tHOU. NO' 1£ - DA'nJM '
Õ.. .\.,..r~Ø':)\~ CE reo or '_I , ...... ~ """,,"" )\' ~ ...... 10 ltEl ON DIH(JI $<Or nrou. --oIL CCHTtJtuN( <\CIOn SAID 1,NtO, 1M( I.OCArlOH . ,
~~ t <k"f. f.~~ "" c~ ~' ~,~"'"' ~ ",,"" ~!'/ 01 "" WWtHr -, IE OCftll....tO,nrou ~ ..._r 01' leCOlO, /HAl IrCOlO 01 SUINt'f... S'D"" AHO AS$OCIAfCS. lNC-
. ~.. \ ' "ø ,0 =1...... .", X III " SWlCc7 10 RUW.nDH 01 ..u COoIL. OIl. CAt - - -... - _'S io rs.to II -e n 01 -= "100( 1f7, Rt-
B)", , ',S' ""'. - - - - , fo ~ JO ¡; ClI'\.ORt 'DIIfHC -r PCII IHSfll\lueNf ruo UNOQ II(ÇOItDINQ NO. ttoSZIO7.\J. 110. 1"707_, Ircooos 01' ""'0 C_I'Y, W-DH
Ii . WOOD ftHCe' , ~ ~"'" -0 0 - UN( 01' fHC SW 'I' 01' Sm'IOH 10 - N IrD7"2f" W
! ", """""\'10 Z
~I , . ~ H ar«'$.. "" ocr "" ~ H Ir,"$'. W 8OO.ocr ~VEY toISTRUMeNTATION :
' lronS'" " ""... - - - - S\JIM'nHO ~W-£D II CØOWHCTIOH """ nos ItCCOO or SU""C'f
' ,1~c¡.!;}~I~'tO I'.;.., '~,' " ...."""'.11'/'" ': ", IlfUUDfHC_tOUlPUtHTNODI'IOCCDo./Itt:' '. .
w O. " {ttN ø ' , ,¡ -./ '" 7CHCC IS' SOUIIfCILY ""CON 01 IDO' VI O£ CItY 011 ' I I 10' TOrolL trAfION """'....to ro lIoUM.ICt\IaU'S ŠPcc:r1cAnoos '
.,... ,," ..--::....~, S 0,7' ' ~.....TDt~"I:s,1~oi...: '8 AS Rt_ED "" WoIC-~7-'-'OD :, . .
,- W O.J' '" fo' II -/"" "',WfloUl,'"""" 01 7017_7,7701710777 - 7~0S7IØ77 " c:<-' ,. , I" ! -"" -, ,--", '.. '-'-"'- ""'OCC_'VSI_'_lISt,__.~......_",
... cw.a.c. I-._--~.., "".:f;;1, " ,.,. 10.".- .. '. -""""".IItC"I"""C""",,~,.~~7-UO-0I0-,__,..~,..
.. . \ "" ,....-- , He EAStutHT . ~ I"V " ' "I'" ....,..;...~..". .. "'V!'" .. ",
" 8 J W 71,r l' 'ø 10 (1",,"" - a- NOS, "',Z'1t I ...\ {p ,
' j ;; , - "'5877 x"\ , ...
,~" ~ WI. Zl..' ....-:.-""t I 2 '3 S\)'P\,)~~~ : 6 I 6 I 7 " SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
J)r'l ~ W 7ft/"" ",,'" -11:- 70' CI..- NCIJNC co.l ,~I Þ. 'Í ,,0. 'i' þ(:J I I., I ~, w n<oS "'" COIIIICCTI,Y a"'"DCHTS A SUIIVCY WoOC 8V Me
' CAICWCH, - lICe. '. I'll """I OR U"OClt ...... OIIICCno.. IN COH'OIlloWlC£ WITH THe
"/ ""( "110. .....08 '0'" Wi,~~ \ \'i$.. ~ø , I JII ~~ IICOUIIIC"CN7I 0' THC sulIYCY IICCOIIOlNe AeT AT THC,.
~ ",,"" - PCIII'IAr' ,.f r >IOV'" ,.. 'g ":) I , ' I: - lIeouesT 0' WC'ICItHAtUSCIt aVoL CSTATC CO""IoH'/"" ,
' ~ 'I I "'" \ ...' g' j~' EASe-"OII - ,- I It ~, n:8IIUAIt'I, 1887. .
W".2" , 'j'\.,n I' \.,,1, -.cut. ""_110.\ K -- trcP... ~'~ßI),/"
. 7D' LoI'YOI'- ' I . =~t~~ ~~7'1.S. z 'd' ,"
~ '" w 703 / =':~.' t' -err I -4 I ¡ SAHI',,"", ItWtJI -) I ""IlL "'0) 'IA A. "", '~"S¡
, ~£CDIIDOoj NO. , ~>l I ' " s, "0, ZtZlt " \'Ø '
Ii:- I 770S7IO27. I.J.Jo-CAt _a I'OS7 H .r..'$t" w ; ~\ '
'! Ò I l/(T/PlColL) I ,.-- , "
~ 'or ....""" "/' "I I' 200.00' ," /;:
0 I 'I", lID': , '-'/
fZ, ': '" I ' I' t ,;tl{,~.,
~ I 'I, I 1D-1IC"'AHOe» I '.. I ' ,
- . 7f.7' , w C$IIINC. U. 110. ISft.. , ,
.. 70'/ n:~" I ~ "o I I I ~~. '.. ,-"It"",
~ HI,r""" w' / ' ~. I w I I ø if ft . I ()I ,
liS', zOO.ocr I I I h I Ii: -..x.." , ,
r tI I' . I ,I '" CONCICIC --.r . , ,
~ ' .' z' N .r"'$4' W "700.ocr ~~ I I ' ~*l. ,RECORDING CERTIFICATE,
..~. , '~I -~
\~.. ,- ~ ' '" H ar"'$4' W JDO,OO' ~ ' ' "u:o '011 lie OliO THIS ~~ 0' -"'"- "ð
\~J ;-;'" , ~ '.. \ "II rUONUUtHTUi CP/fDlUNt N ....."... 71",01' (csu.' k , - -:- -=-..:!; , ~m...y '~:..~,N~~9tf ~,S~ 0," , '
. \ '0 '. : " 'j - hI"" ~' ~- SOUTH 320th, STREET ,It Ifll,l3' ~, " , ...,I...¡).',,' .~~ ~' . '" ,
"". .~ - --=-=-=-=:- '-----~- ~ ~~ L" n.;o.J
'- ,"" ' H IrDJ"2" w 7H5..1S' . - - -:-- - -,. 7/1 \ CIt.',' SUPT. 0' IICCOIIOS '
' 'OUHOTO.o.IIION","£" 1P.,1ICIAII_- ,'.'.i., .. :. ~~~~ ,-"","..... ,', ~ ,', ", '
[~-,......_, '~~U~!*'-" c ' .........,~*,= . .11£, ROINCNO, 97t"1Yt"l~9....."" . "
r4ClC,lfCU( . ,IN-. 1'~7,::. " : ii, 'CUNO..x.. ,','::I'
Crt8/lUllYlllO ',~, . I ~~..CU( '; I' :'.. ' .:' , ;'. ' ..
(IoIoIICHlttD) . ,'II, ESM'.'.nc".¡' ' ':';.' ,"
, ',- ' . , '. '
~ ". ,'i . "OH.a;..~'s..u......:x;.~~;., ,
~ a . , , '," ,
I . Z ' 720 So, ~.8th" St~..;' ,'r' .
"EOERAI. WAY. WASHINGTON 58003 .
;'-1.,: OIlloWlNC NAAlC , Il1O-1' ~I - PHONE I [20.] 838-8113 .
. '
,,'
.,
d
:
J(.'.
j':.
;' :':.
,';.
~
..
. '-----,.,...., .
'._"""""." ...., """"""'" .
.....-....--....,...,
,. .,.,..," ...', "" ....... ,......,.,..--...---------...--
(, .
I
/\.Y'Y\Q8 - 000 \
RECEiVED BY
~ ()E\.'E!..OPMENT DEPARTMENT
"
NOTICE OF IN1ENTION TO
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION
MAY 2 7 1998
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
of the City of Federal Way
35530 First Way South
Federal Way, Washington 98003
Mayor and Council Members:
, Pursuant to RCW 35A 14. 120, the undersigned, Weyerhaeuser Company
(the "Initiating Party"), which is the owner of not less that 10 percent (10%) in value of
the property for which annexation is sought, hereby notifies the City Council of the
City of Federal Wayofits intention to petition for annexation ofits property to the
City of Federal Way.
The property proposed for annexation (the "Subject Property") is legally
described on Exhibit A, attached hereto. A map outlining the boundary of the Subject
Property is also attached hereto. The Subject Property is within the City's Urban Growth
Boundary as designated by the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and is contiguous to
existing City boundaries.
The Initiating Party contemplates that the City of Federal Way will prepare and
, file proposed zoning regulations for the Subject Property pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330.
and .340.
Pursuant to RCW 35A. 14. 120, the Initiating Party hereby requests that the
City Council set a date, not later than 60 days after the filing of this Notice of Intention, ,
for a meeting with the Initiating Party to determine whether the City of Fedei:'al Way will :
accept this Notice of Intention and allow for the subsequent submission of a petition for
annexation, whether it shall require simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning
regulations as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and .340, and whether it shall require the
assumption of a portion of existing City indebtedness by the area to be annexed.
DATED this 1'1-,¡..J day of
MAy
. 1998.
::YEr:~';TE COMPANY
Name: C/. lAZMI\ç
Title: ~ 1)1t-~ ' .
'IO26S 11101-111 4IZJ1'98
EXHIBIT A
PAGEL OF jj
'-""'" ""'"
., "."."
"
.' '.
M--'____.---.
,.. .......- "-"-'-""U_"" "-'-. -------.-.--
.
.
¡ f~ ~
~ ¡ il ,
5 It..
~¡"ti ~
f ~..
: ~:_fL
. . l' ~
I .1...
N
3M"
~ ILW¡W
tt
1$
...
:w
<1'
,..
::J
~
n ;yT"
.
(
~
A
~
)
h
r
~
I rill
~
"""II
\t
J'I,..J
.
'\.
,
fto
',0
þ
a-
0
1$
~
¡ :
, .
..,,"-. 't._W_,-,
"
...
.
~ .
\\
~IIW' L8.
..
t t I
'\. .
.----- --- D
t. J
to
If
'::~;!:~::Y~:?'-'
,
,.
--- - --.--- -- ..
VI
Q
~
1\1
'"
~
..
.Þ¡:S
~
11)1
VI
VI
þ!J
t,.I)
n
t't'
0
~
tr
0
IS
c+
ttj
IS
....
~
ft'
...
:J
It!
~
....
".
~
VI
41
£
~
...
C't'
~
0.
,.-
.'
,.
..
II
~
.
..
9~
-
6
,
..
a. .
. C'I ,,¥...
~~
, ....--..-.-------
\.A ~
~~ \ c¡S!
~~. ~
~~
~.
~\:':I,;
~~\
. I
"
~
~
0
,
8000
O'C 0
-1)(j)CD(J)
- -Á) Cß-ù
#"\0
X
tu
~
LtI
.Þo
trf
~
....
Z
l-
S)
-
....... r -
1.
-
--
-
..
"
\i"IJ.
\~~
..
,,_.-,------~'."="""-""""""
"----'--h...--_...., .................,.., """""""""""" ,""""'" , "
, ....' ..------.......,.".-.........---......---..-....,...--..----------------.:.-......
(
.' .
f\ tJ tV 98- ØçtØ "2
.¡.
RECEIVED BY
COMMUNIlY OE'fE! (\0"-' . ~ -". --, "'="'"
HAY 27 1998
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO'
PETrnON FOR ANNEXATION
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
of the City of Federal Way
35530 First Way South
Federal Way, Washington 98003
Mayor and Council Members:
~ursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned, Weyerhaeuser Company
(the "Initiating Party"), which is the owner of not less that '10 percent (10%) in value of
the prope!1Y for which annexation is sought, hereby notifies the City Council of the
City off' ederal Way of its intention to petition for annexation of its property to the
City of Federal Way.
The property proposed for annexation (the "Subject Property") is legally
described on Exhibit A., attached hereto. A map outlining the boundary of the Subject
Property is also attached hereto. The Subject Property is within the City's Urban Growth
Boundary as designated by the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and is contiguous to
existing City boundaries.
The Initiating Party contemplates that the City ofFede~ Way will prepare and
file proposed zoning regulations for the Subject Property pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330
and .340.
Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the Initiating Party hereby requests that the
City Council set a date, not later than 60 days after the filing oftbis Notice of Intention,
for a meeting with the Initiating Party to determine whether the City of Federal Way will
accept this Notice of Intention and allow for the subsequent submission of a petition for
annexation, whether it shall require simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning
regulations as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and .340, and whether it shall require the
assumption of a portion of existing City indebtedness by the area to be annexed.
DATED this ~ day of
MACi
. 1998.
ESTATE COMPANY
180265 11101-121 .vz.JI9I
By
Name: .
Title: ~...tJ.,..
EXHIB~T- AJJ
PAGE..ILOF .
A PORTION. OF THE SW
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
~¡
ö"""""'"
'.
...
I
I
I :
¡
¡
\.J
..,.-"--.....
<t
....
.-
.Q
.-
.c
)(
W
';~'-"
~
L. .':- . - ,."
, OItAW\HG IWoIt : IIII-~.
1/4
RECORD OF SURVEY
NW 1/4 OF SECTION
WASHINGTON
OF SECTION
15 AND OF THE
KING COUNTY,
"
txCCl'I IN( NOIIIII
22,
." .- -----.
T'NP.
21
N.,
RGE.
4
E..
W.M:
;:
§ PARCEl. K-4
, ..... -lION I1f IN( _III M OUI I1f IH( rou- O(-tO ...om, -C>I I.ICI sou....
C-"tou 01 I<IUII<CASI UN& 01 10'0 occoco 10 '1N4 COUHf'f 11 DUO II(CCIIOCO ....ocl '
IItCOIIOINC NO. ZSHqJ, IItCCllOS 01 S.uo ~f'f. - AS ROY .. I8SOoP co..wf'f 10-,.
--- AT - -- _T 4f 110( SOU1II ~tCA COIIN~ 01 StCIIOI IS, ~
'at NOIIIW. 1&Net . WT. ".11., II DIG CCUNfY, ,,-tON; ,..-
IIICNCt -... CIO'1r 'O(S1' ;¡o IU1\ ...
1\4OICt SCUll4 1t'O$' IItSf IIIIAI fCC~ m
INCNCC _lIt 21'01' Wf 140.11 rul: ~
- sou... 'I'IJ' tAIl In,OI ru' 10 IH( '- "ONI 01 ~ 01 IN( MllllfCf . .
-CO ....cu, c:!:J ¡ ~'.
1ICHCt çeoo- SCUIll Int C'" AII.IJ ruT: ~
IICIICC ~OII'" %I'll' IItSI 187," ,tel: ~
IIOCC -... 111t OUI 20...2rul: niP n
,JL,o
- SOU'" 00"01' 11(11 310 rtU 10 IN( _I 01 It- .-,","
(lONG - AS l1li: .011- 01 IN( t&Sow- ".~- 01 SQUIll »t'" lIoal,
~- KnctN l1li: _III UN( 01 IH( - OC- ...c:a. X.I, - IH( SOUIII \ Nt
01 IUC1I .It - JY, _111 Wt IHOIIC ~S, -C_.)
.~ PARCEl. L
1IIC IOU1M N"IJ' 01 IN( [.&SI 730 ruT 01 CO'oÞNIICNI \OT t, src- II, -- 21
-111, UMce t [.&IT, ""N. II ICING COUIofY. .'-GTCH:
txCCI'I IH( t-ST 30 'UT -' CXCCI'T IH( SCUIll 30 rul '011 "'os:
(10lIO ""..... 'S ...el III 0/" NOlI'" ~t - ~ ACe_. TO IIIC -tCOOOCD
0\,\, IkÞCO/".)
PAReD. II
"
IH( SOUIN JO rtu 01 l1li: CAST 730 rttT 01 -tNI ~Ol t, src- Is. 10"'- 21
"011111. ,- t tAlT, ...... II DIG COo.INf'f, w-OTCH:
txCCI'l IH( [.&" 30 ruY '011 tJHO A'tNU( SOUTN.
,,\
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
r'
i
/,
r
r
f
,,'PAACEi."K-i
It_NG AI A STONt NOHUlltNl .1 lIlt _111 QllAlltCA COIIM~ 01 srCIION Is. T""'- 21 NOlI"',
lANcet CAST. ",1/. .. ICINO eOUNfY. ..A_TCH:
=~IIIII"OI'II(IT _0 1IIi: ~ UN( prS&lO SI:?IIOI. 730 'm.To.,1IIt.~,.':2!!!~.~_._~,!.I\¡~~ '!!.'.I!...~JY..~ ~~,~,I~,~..!,~~,.
1IICNCf: NOlIN oo'lr 11(" "o.n rul¡
IICIICC I<IUIII 11'12' II(IT Slo.oo fCCl¡
IICNCt _1M OO'Sr ro" _SI 'Uf, "OOC 011 USS, III 1IIC sre- \ NCI
IItCIICI: AUIOO 10\10 StC~OII LINt NOIIIII 11"01' r.i¡I 110.00 rtcr 10 1IIC _, 0/" KGIN!I"O¡
(10lIO -- AS . JOIt- 0/" ,"AC' 117, "0II1M ~C SHOIIt LNIOS, '-00II0 ro 1ItC -CCOIIOCO 0\,\1
IMPtO/",) .
,.,PARCEI. K-~
K- .. . SlOHt "OHUutNI 41 IN( SOUIII QII""IP _U 0/" Ste- 11. 10"'- II _III,
RAllce . tAIl, ..AI.. .... COUNfY, ._ION. -- IIICNCt NOIIIN OO'lr II(IT JO ruT:
1ItCNCI: SOUIN II'QI' 11(" Iltl,l1 ra:r
-C _IN 21"01 t'SI StD.II rull
IItCIICt _111 11'12' tAIl J77.OI ruT to. IIC IIIIIC PONI 0/" It-er
1IICNCf: _IN - t." 120 rul¡
f>otNCt _IN lI'St r'll ~30 rul¡'
IHCNCC SCUIN 2t'll' usr 2SI.t7 reCTI
II<CNCt MOOIll II'SJ' II(S! ASI.IJ ruf to þ ( IllUt ""1 01 - txCCl'I IN( NOIIIII
10 rul 1IICIIt0l /'OIl COUNrr 10&0: . .
(ICING w- AS TO'CII II. '" II &NO U. _111 \.AI(¡ IHOIIt wooS, 'CCOOOONC 10 INt UNRtCØIIOtO
0\,\1 "'Pter).
'II PARC£\. K-3
1"",,- AI IH( -IIItA" - 01" _I \01 J. src- Is. 1""'- 21 "001111. .....cè .
tAU. WoN. II ICING COUII!Y. "'-I0Il;
INOICC SCUll< 11'12' oar ,~ _TIt UNC 01 S&IO COIONlltNl I.Or J. 180 ,ar:
fHÓOC:C SQUIll OO'Sr uS! "'4I.U\. to TIlt: CASI UN( 01" s.uo \Or. 1171 rur ro lit( llUC ,...r 0/"
ItCINll1OG;
IItCNCC HOllIN 'I'SI' II(SI II' ruT, _c 01 uss. TO ICIOfNC4Ir UN( 01 "" OCtocø TO ICING COUNtY
IV oao IICCOOIOCO UNOU Rt- NO. ml'lJ, IItCOIIOS 01 CCUIIIY. k- AS ROY .. UlSCNtII
COUNTY "OADI .
INOICC NOI1It[.&STtlU AI.CIHC TIlt: SCUINt4SIPI.Y UN( 01 S4IO _fY lOAO TO A PØNI 11101/ - III(
IIIIIC PONT 01 ~ WoIS SCUll OO1r CASII '
IICIICC SOUIII CIO'1r c.sr 120 ruT. IIOIIC .. uss. 10 1IC IIIUC PONr 01" -
(lONG -- AS TIC JOIt-S f11 tIIACTS JI - . _iN \.AI(¡ SHOIIt UNOS, IINItcOIIOCO. ~W<G'
WI 01 1IIC CUIIY~l\ I t CONN(ellOH 01" CCUNIY \ IO\IN AS SCUIll ~1M SlIIal olIO Jl1II A">ÐIUt
SCU1ll.) ,
"". ....... eOllllCCTl.Y "~IICltHTS A ~U""tY w.oC IV >It
011 UNOCII ..... OlllCc:TIOf IN eOH'OIlIol4HÇC WIT>< ,,",c
IICOUlllt..tHTS 0' ,,",c SUIlVtY IItc:o"-o ACT AT 7I<C
!lCOUEST o' r..c OUAOIIAHT eOllOOllAT1ON IN 'tlllUAIIV, .Itl7.
:6:3/~~v
I
I
r
¡
(,
¡"
II, seOTT "'AcIl<1"OS"
...S, NO, ISI..
orl"/tl
RECORDING CERTIFICATE
"~tO 'o~"o T><'~'~"þ4V 0' -1!1.~_J......'
1917 'T' .w, IN VOWUt I!L- 0' suiiti<i'S ON
'ACt Z4 AT T><t lltau IT, 0' tsll, ,'Me, ,
;,
~CIf
SuPT, 0' Iceolos
IIteollOlllO NO, '7ð.52294/(
',"
[1--- ESM inc. .
- M r-c..... SUO('(, ... - ..- -- ...
. 720 S. 348th $TREÉT
n:oEIW. WAY. WASHING' 118093
--" PHONe I [208] ~8-8)...
r
"
.... .... -,.¡-..--.., -...
cA '\.~F<I"~ t'ð~ \'i~) REGOR'"", OF SURVEY.
OF" THE SW 1/4 OF" SECTION 15 AND OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TWP, 21 N" RGE,
10
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ~ ~ø:o.~~:o}
" .,wu' . 1211,"" (au) f"" 11+17.0< \
(IIIIt " "'$1'00" t ("VoT) I -
- 1"1,'" _:... " """20" C (uo, -- "
1;'í1~'?'-=1...:-.,..'lA99;,ll ~h(~Wl"~lMI'.......,............. 1$ - r--1ifr,
'I ! to'OTOO" (...)-eC5I'1 ' : \. I 2I,...r - :"'1.
CCHr~"-OO " 10'11 .~ 'I : I
'V tU11'«'11»7" , Ii ~--- _..l'~ : 'O"O.f
,~ce~.,::t ~ i: ¡ (u-' ,
...~I!';------.. !
~I I '
nr_~r'l Ii :1
,II(.-------i~ i,
I: It " 113 '
Ii d il I~ !
~ ,I Ijl!i'------. 5 1
ill! iii I... -
;! I !I II" (
i! WR~ Ii ~____---i;l J -
IXt:Sä I: I' ' PI :
C,' I ..
d~~ !I~----U. z ~
AS-ill I ~ r------UU !.oJ -----------1 I
'fh II it I S'/~ -
.. -;I r ;Io-------{ a I
libl !il~il~ii :i fit ;
..» !f~.-----i ~ %
).1~11 ~ !It : :' - ~
3s'I;t!l!..-----i:! ;to;j' ¡
;18! , '" I;; ... '
zz r Ib Ç: æ:
I !f-------If: ~ ~ ¡ I
I . I ~ .
It ¡I ,II 111 : I
I-I: ¡L-------I Z '1\4 t::
~ II1I I ~i
III; : I ~: C'
¡~ I ~u----. ~ j ~ -
QI"¡l I, ~: - ~
-.. . , ' "r :""..,
'C ~ i ------ --,--. - - " " :
.r.i~ II " I : :' ~ ... COOIHCt NOr
..: I : , : ! .. $ClOUt ro II
~ I, ~-------I - 'I i' ::~r ø I
(Q!;I-(UIoI) I: ìr 1;¡3 : ~ : i - w ~.,(c- "'\: ,J;'" .nh.' W
6.'11:t~ i ÌL.----- . Se:. '\t' A II~ ~ \I,~ 700. L::...
PAFIC£LK-3, ~:SOI.o1' In'" ll~~ :151 o!loP J ~ [- '
" : ' .. " 'I!ó' . I , Is.O' rCHC( 'VIa: '
PARe£!.. K-4 ~ "81'S1'18' w . .~à u --I h I I . a I~ Z W 1.0' S 1,0' SILl.
('" HOlt I) U.OI' I I a~ :..' :: . ¡1: I . . ' 01,.
'J.Jt07U'~ 61'.~~~' II;! _+i~-----t-~-"----_':'_----:i; ~
(ul' SOU'/H ~th STRUT \ . Jt",r I ot I ~~ ;. 1 ¡ .. I -100'
"""0100'. ,11111 i, '" :
""."... .....-=--- . I ----I z...' I .. OC(I.O 101'" \IMC " 1IC HOIII"
...\ ~,.., .,~ ..... ftm... r I "f I ' I r
I &'&-'tI~ It"'l "'~--,_._- "o¡. - 04 I I ~ ..., " co.-r ~Ol .
. ,..'$1 . ~Y\ I , 111011"" "1- -----..1 iIJOJ' "Vol" ;7:oro,_I"'Huo.
~ %.. i /O)m¡ L.xt s.o,J~; .. 80 ",c.W41" ,,~~ ~~r:loJ:-,,"r !C"') I . ...,rll' w IIJ ",
¡"',... \' '__I IOI¡" I "~ ..~. .
.. ..~'~ \ (U/oA(.CØ""""I ,....J"'I 00 I 01 '."" : I , sa DETAIL ...' j
"" ~\'I ,If" ':-\ ~
{l11~7 ~..,\I'" 87'31'11' w ~PARCEL K-2 ~ ~ ~s ~" ($CC Hore 11)
~ '~ "I--..L--.L J..l7' I 1 . 0" ' ~~
r_..ON",.' 4:-~" -. -- - -' '- - -..... '" '" JO.1O,~' I) to: '
" ' f,."'1 '/ '" sa DETAIL ',,'" \ .' ("'1 Io~
t !!~ . ,.,' , ~l'" """"" ï ~ ,-, f "- -::::.:. y~ ?:-r . ~ í RECORDING CERTIFICATE
I l Llr. §,~(./' "I$.' j... l'~j '~It to- e"Vo!.4 PARCEL L
I . """1" " ctTJ Y "~, """'ttrf '-1 ~j):,. ~ ~~ PARCEL K-1 3: ~-..t. M~
QWII...A ~ ~ 'I, '.I '4 r-~", i p\t ¡r i! PI~ §~ 111 .
,', tf ' ~ '. I : 1 " "I" ..
k r.~ ...,.~, 'A~: I I~" I.. !-fl'.,H' z~ z;:¡
, p' 'I(~"./ ;ct ~---~ I .... a$ ~ \y 7J1'
Il ,:fß~\.... ,700 "g' ¡ .: : Î~ «~., 1:1' '~I (1,(~-(CSiI) M ..'$t'I~'"
. I .. ~$' " ~ : I I d "I" ):~I JO.CO'
181$ 1/'/ 'oJ 2 n: I. I X..." )¡If ,"'°,00' (SHOIII"'AI.o.l74070)
~ ... ., ~",IJ' (t5"1 " .. ,/1.,... .........,~..........: I tSCIU'/H 336th STREET (" ..1 $tO,oQ' (\tGAU J. / lIlt.'" J-;:CSUI ,I'
¡" ' - ,._..0. .. V""...." "','" eCSilI....... ....., ' ,1
11 .~.. jjjtjj'o'or-- - .- '-"--::'J' . .. ., 1..r.., I. .r;r- - - - 1-'
...... M II.,,'IJ" W o.J"..:;r" (sa: NOIU , - II) , lur .
'-CA~OM1tO COAHCO I'SUO J ~ ...,.'u'.. II)UJ" S""" pl"""" ' L.o JfJ' lsa: WOIU '. II a 171 1jJ
, ; . I UO<IH CJ\11\NC _CHIAIICH . ............., 2 OF 3
! . lQUIOO OJ SCCIICH It
, , (QUIOO reUA con. MOlt, rOYHQ COHCIItlt YQHUU(Nr .
_1...111 PASS , UN( 101011111$ CASItRl.Vo.J" ..'" ""SS III.\IC (SCOltlllP Ittl,
.' 1100( .. 1,(.10, 1.0' tC\.ow 0.31' - IIC UN( \Q lilt lIOII" '
. \ I A,...,.,r (uAAO< lItO) - - ' P AReEL M
,. L .-~ -, . ~..... ""'¡O"u - øt' ,<1JNWxn-.J
- (OCt"'l
n~l~
few
:J:ø
tjö:
. , . , . . - . , . . .
!ttr-I-~~~
' ¡,
'j' tÌ ..... ~
I f¿'-
IS, r$ - - - -
r . \'.
I' \ """CIUHO '",AWOO UONUutNl
"1" I' "'ASS cÞI' .. CAse
II (""0\ IttO) sa NOTES ON SHEET 2 OP 3
! I t LEGeM)
I I :cr IIU'" - CAI' 'au, ..e. \,s. I/O. 1$1'"
I : . I 0 ~~:'d~ =~,c:-~ r>.lD
I ." set lit'" - - '(SU, we. \,s. NO. ,spl/1Snl'
¡ I /CIllO COIICIIt7C ~ _óor ..IN "'An cÞI'
Ð ser 8. U>I. IHC. (Kt IIC- Of $UlMV rUG
I ' -- IIC~ I/O. 'mlltOOII - \IOUn
OIloP"IIItC NOreo
Ii;:; 0 __'.'NOftO
. I I ~ (SK) ..._tCH STAIt _n _s- w..n.tNI
¡ ¡ . ,. I . r.~r,~~:,'011 SA 'I ..., 0.1' TO 110 I,ll'
li~'
- . - - -.
(",AT)
~ro'~,="'JO\AX'1 :=srpeoco
~ I
100, 100 0 100 '00
!
¡
SCA1..E: ,. .. 200'
l"'A1)
011 MI ) " ) tertii, to IIC _C_O
....1 " _II< ~...C - ~-,..
- ~IT C- OU..1\.IOI1 ","",S FOIl
S. ))1110 S1IICtt _liON - "!PSIAt( s. .
11M A'JOIUt S. SUII'Æ'I II( , "-110+-10' SHeet J
" <, CCN1IIACf 100. a,sTI
IOC}
(OCI
QUlI ~ CCR "CO _co AUOI7IIII" ru
NO. IH'4IJ
'-1 rcoo '01 .. ..WOP RoÞO csr.euSMCO
ø. IICU OAttO rctllUMV If, IUO ~ IC"SC
ACC- ro ""'10(' NO. UJTA A' IICCCflOCII II
>OI.uuc I"" ..ce ., AHO tI
0"' T\JM :
"SOS " ..cooo:ONIAI, OAI\IU 1$ 114" ,ttoaø 01 "",Io(Y
.. 'V'" ""' ASSoo'7C" ..e.. rug IN YCUNC n 01
SUIt""" .ACt 1)1, ~tCllOOlG 100. 1)o~IIIOO , IIC:CO~
" !WIG C_N, W~T()I, -OR'" ~1Wt " ... ,/, "
'l(C- " . .. '1'$1'11' W
,..-. ,I.. ..,
I
I
!~
;,
t~
- -
(...,
".-, -- ..'
';~'
...- ..,.- ' _.
VI'
fUO fOR/,~s.~RO T"'$ U:t- DAV Of .~¿----, .
~~: ~~".""TH-r~~Juë's~õ" t:u.'~otC~ 0"
WN<4ÇtII
'(CORDING NO,
,]tJ$.122o/l
su"r, 0' .t~OS
[I ESM inc.
<.... c--. - SuM>, .. -.. IJ- ......... NO
720 S. J'8th STREET
F"EOE~ WA,V, WÞ.$HINCiTON gllOOJ
PIoIONE' (206) 8~8-'\ ,~
0101 >10, ItI...,-..,-o1O~ I DArts OS-If-,7
. . . .., .'-""..... ,.
...,.., , ,..-"",."--""-""'-'---'----........,. ...."
Proposed
Quadrant
Annexation
To the City of
Federal Way
S,:I12lur.
Steel Lake
Park
..
...
5'
~
,.
B. 338111
Ii. 338Ui ST.
..
This proposed annexation is
subject to acceptance by
the Federal Way City Council.
If accepted. signatures
representing at least 60%
of the assessed value
must be gathered.
Legend:
Ð Area 1
. 8 Area2
æI Annexation Area
D City of Federal Way
VICinity Map
EXHIBIT
PAGE--'--- OF
~o Feet
Map Date: JlI1e 10. 1998.
City of Federal Way,
33530 Am Way S,
Federal Wri, WA 98003
(253) 661-4000.
This map is intended fót use as a ~
graphical representation ONLY. The
City of Federal Way makes no
warranty as to Its accuracy.
.~
=> GI~ DIVISION
fusersl mikeslpro ¡ect! an nex/allan ne x2. amI
1 Proposed Quadrant Annexation
Valuation/Annexation Petition Signatures
',~;¡
1
j
1
j
j
j
j
j
,
J
J
¡
j
!
Parcel Number Owner
, Mailing Address
Size* Land
(Acres) Value
Bldg.
Value
Total
Value
Signed
Petition?
Area 1
5515600091 Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 1.25 23,400 0 23,400 YES
5515600005 Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 2.41 241,000 0 241,000 YES
5515600010 Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 2.56 321,200 0 321 ,200 YES
551560 0015 Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 2.56 192,700 0 192,700 YES
5515600020 Weyerhaeuser R; E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 2.56 192,700 0 192,700 YES
5515600026 Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 1.28 96,700 0 96,700 YES
551560 0025 Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 1.37 103,500 0 103,500 YES
5515600030 Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 2.75 206,200 0 206,200 YES
551560 0035 Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 1.6 120,700 0 120,700 YES
5515600037 Fire District #39** 31617 1st Ave S. Federal Way Wa 98003 1.14 125.000 845,100 970.100 NO
Area 2
6143600186
6143600635
Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1
Weverhaeuser R: E Co Wre 2-1
Tacoma Wa 98477
Tacoma Wa 98477
". 2.060.100
. '
, Source: FW-GIS, MetroScan.
MS:C:\PARC2.WB?
6-10-98 .
, *NOTE: Actual size of annexation is larger, as it contains some right-or-way, which is not Included in this total.
** This parcel was not included in the original annexation proposal, but is recommended for inclusion by Federal Way staff.
~~
ø:J:
m-
~,~
O.
"
I
¡
¡
. I
I I
. 1
.! I
: !
¡. ¡
I
_.h-. -...
(()
~
JJ1
r::
.s
~
$. 316th St.
tJ)
t:
:e
:::¡
>
t:
(.)
~
~
..J
c(
a:
FEDERAL IW A Y CITY liMITS
OP-1
(FW)
OP-1
(FW)
OP-1
(FW)
OP-1
(FW)
W
LL
Proposed
Quadrant
Annexation
To the City of
Federal Way
Area 1
Legend:
...
Federal Way City Umits
Annexation Area Boundary
Proposed by Staff
Zoning Boundary
Petitioned Annexation Area
.....
~
~--
LLLlJ
CJ
City of Federal Way
Existing KIng County Zoning
Is shown in GRAY. Proposed
Federal Way Zoning is shown
in BLACK.
Scale: 1 to 4440
1 Inch equals 370 Feet
0 500 Faat
~-- I ~
¡eN
em' Q/I' ~
~
~ = GIS DIVISION
¡users/mlkes/project/ann ex/ann BX1 b.amI
..
Proposed Quadrant Annexation
Valuation/Annexation Petition Signatures
Parcel Number Owner
Mailing Address
Size* Land
(Acres) Value
Bldg.
Value
Total
Value
Signed
Petition?
. .. -- .. .
5515600091 Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 1.25 23,400 0 23,400 YES
551560 0005 - Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 2.41 . 241,000 0 241,000 YES
5515600010 Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 2.56 321,200 0 321,200 YES
5515600015 Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 2.56 192,700 0 192,700 YES
551560 0020 Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 2.56 192,700 0 192,700 YES
551560 0026 Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 1.28 96,700 0 96,700 YES
551560 0025 Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 1.37 103,500 0 103,500 YES
551560 0030 Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 2.75 206,200 0 206,200 YES
5515600035 Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1 Tacoma Wa 98477 1.60 120,700 0 120,700 YES
5515600037 Fire District #39** 31617 1st Ave S. Federal Wav Wa 98003 1.14 125.000 845.100 970 100 NO
¡Area 1 Totals: (without Fire Station) - 1,498,100 I 0 - 100% I
'Area 1 Totals: (with Fire Station) - 1,623,100 ¡ 845,100 - 61% I
*NOTE: Actual ~ize of annexation is larger, as it contains some right-of-way, which Is not included in this total.
! ** This parcel was not included in the original annexation proposal, but is recommended for inclusion by Federal Way staff.
. . . .. .
. .
. I
.¡
. ¡
NORTH LAKE
.
RS 7.2 (FW)
OP-1
(FW)
CP-1
(FW)
OP-1
(FW)
OP-1
(FW)
OP-1
(FW)
Proposed
Quadrant
Annexation
To the City of
Federal Way
Area 2
Legend:
...
Federal Way City Umlts
..... .
Annexation Area Boundary
Proposed by Staff
G--e- .
Zoning Boundary
~ Petitioned Annexation Area
CJ City of Federal Way
existing KIng County Zoning
Is shown In GRAY. Proposed
Federal Way Zoning Is shown
In BLACK.
Scale: 1 to 4440
1 Inch equals 370 Feet
0 500 Foot
~
~
N
.1iI ~
~
~ = GIS DIVISION
I usersl mi kes/p rei ectJann erJ ann ex2b. ami
Proposed Quadrant Annexation
Valuation/Annexation Petition Signatures
Parcel Number Owner
Mailing Address
Weyerhaeuser R;E Co Wre 2-1
Weverhaeuser R:E Co Wre 2-1
Area 2 Totals:
*NOTE: This ar~a contains NO right-of-way.
Source: FW-GIS, MetroScan.
f MS:C:\PARC3.WB2
6-10-98
=om
~~
m-
1m
~:¡
I
O\~
r
Tacoma Wa 98477
Tacoma Wa 98477
Size. La'nd
(Acres) Value
208,000
229.000
437,000
Bldg.
Value
Total
Value
k
f
~
~
£
6
f
~
I
~
Signed
Petition?
0
0
0
~
f
I
¡
"
King County
Department or Assessments
King County Adminislration Bldg.
500 Fourth AvCQue, Room 708
Seattle, WA 98104-2384
RECEIVED
JUN 1 8 1998
OfTy CLERKS OFFICE
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Scott Noble
Assessor
@
(206) 296-5195
FAX 29~595
ANNEXA TI 0 N PETITION CER TIFI CA TI 0 N
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the two pennons (labeled Parcels 1 and 2)
submitted June 11, 1998 to the King County Department of
Assessments by N. Christine Green, City Oerk for the City of
Federal Way, supporting the annexation to Federal Way of the
properties described as ~e Weyerhaeuser Annexation, has been
examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers and assessed
value of property listed thereon caIefully compaIed with the King
County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to
be sufficient under the provisions of the Revised Code of
Washington, Section 35A.O1.040.
Dated this 17th day of June, 1998
5ú74
'f) Scott Noble, King Co ty Assessor
f§fj<'"" /Yt¡,'
: ( . ~ ~~UL .
(!, : . U~?5l ~ Æ.~- êl . ""Wo', R~ÇEI,!ED BY
'd C( h <: I ., í/ ..,,/jN!¡\ .:-I/J: (}fJMENTDEP'-'-"-'"
1/ ~ /¥-,--vL<~ EXtUáif3 P
PAGE--J-OF --L
..
""""""""""""","~~,","o<">,,,""~~Ù""""""" .
FROM : ( I NG COUNTY FIRE t139 ADM
TO:
MAR 6, 1998
2:07PM
2536614129
, -' -
KING COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 39
. FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPARTMENT
31617. 1ST AVENUE SOUTH
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003-5299
Greg Moore, Director
Conununity Development Services
City of Federal Way
March 6, 1998
Dear Mr. Moore,
I wan~ed to take this opportunity to clarify our position on the potential annexation of
our property, parcel # 91-0788146locatcð at 3700 S. 320Cb into the City of Federal
Way. Per our earlier reques4 we are asking that we be includeØ in a proposed
annexation of W eyerhaeuser property that is adjacent to our property. ..
In an effort to be consistent with that annexation, we would ask that our property
zoning be classified consistent with the Weyerbaeuser annexation property! We are
seeking inclusion of our property annexation jnto the update to (be Comprehensive
Plan.
Since the annexation process is new to me, I would appreciate any ìnfonnation on what
I n~ed to do in this process, it would be much appreciated.
Sjl1CuerclY.
a ~..
~ amilwn,
A d mi,n is tta tor
EXHIBIT
PAGE_.LaF
n.._.___-~..__.. - _.' ---------- -
OJ/06/90 ~~I 1J:17 [TX/RX NO 7999J
... ...--- -- !..
-
P.Ø2
'.....'.................-
.._.. .. .. .,....---------------------
. .......
FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPARTMENT
3161715t Avenue South
AECE federal Way, Washington 98003-5201
IVED BY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
JUN 2 9 1998
Greg Moore, Director
Community Development Services
City of Federal Way
June 29, 1998
Dear Mr. Moore,
I understand that Weyerhaeuser Corporation has submitted a 10% petition to annex a
portion of property located north of S. 320th. I would like to take this opportunity to
restate our desire to include our property, parcel # 91-0788146 located at 3700 S. 320th,
as part of the Weyerhaeuser annexation into the City of Federal Way.
If there is any additional information that I can provide, please feel free to contact me
at your convenience.
ã~
/f=:ar:
Lori Michaelson ~
Sr. Planner
Cc:
EXHIBIT J
PAGE .._Z__OF ~
'.
phone: (253) 839-6234 or 927-3118
E-mail: inFo@fwfd.bess.net
Fax: (253) 946-2086
An Equal Opportunity Employer
~~~~~-~--.
........"..""..~.-
.__.~,.~.. ,
---.-----,
CITY OF .
~ . ~ ~r--a~~~
- - -- ~ ~-==-- ~'--
~~ RY 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH
(253) 661-4000
FEDERAL WAY. WA 98003-6210
Date:
June 30, 1998
To:
Land Uselfransportation Committee (LUTC)
Greg Moore, Director M
Department of Community Development
From:
Subject:
School Impact Fees
Request orLand Use and Transportation Committee:
Recommendation to City Council recommending approval of draft resolution adopting School
Impact Fee Schedule for 1998-1999 (see Exhibit A).
Background:
Ordinance
On November 21, 1995, the City Council adopted Ordinance 95-249 authormng the collection of
school impact fees on residential development. Tlùs ordinance was adopted under the authority of .
Chapter 82.02 Revised Code of Washington (RCW). Section 14.217 of the ordinances authorizes
the City Manager to enter an interlocal agreement with the school district to implement the
ordinance. Responsibilities of the school district and city are noted below in Sections 14-218 and
14-219.
Sec. 14-218. Submission of District Capital Facilities Plan and Data.
On an annual basis, the District shall submit the following materials to the City:
A.
The annual update of the District's Capital Facilities Plan, including an updated
fee calculation and a revised fee schedule.
B.
An annual report on the School Impact Fee Account, showing the source and
amount of all monies collected, earned, or received, arid the public improvements
that were financed in whole or in part by impact fees. (See Exhibit B)
u """'."""""""'" "."" " """.....",."..,ùc,ù,.""".,..",."""".'
.. ""..." ..
Sec. 14-219. Review.
The fee schedule in the District's Capital Facilities Plan shall be reviewed and updated by
by the Council on an annual basis after the Council receives the District's Capital Facilities
Plan and report required under Sec. 14-218. The review may occur in conjunction with the
annual update of the capital facilities plan element of the City's comprehensive plan.
Interlocal Agreement:
In May 1996, the City Council authorized and the City Manager executed an lnterlocal
Agreement for the Collection, Distribution, and Expenditure of School Impact Fees.
Impact Fees:
Exišting and' proposed impact fees are noted below. Attached as Exlúbit C is sample impact fees
from aroun~ ,King County as provided from the school district.
Single Family
Multi-Family
1996
1997
1998 (proposed)
Difference 98-97
$1,707
$2,372
$2,882
$ 510
. $1,423
$1,058
$ 874
$- 184
Primary difference this year for single-family school impact fee going up is an increase in student
generating factor and, to a lesser extent, school site acquisition costs. Primary difference for
multi-family school impact fee going down is a reduction in student generating factor.
Capital Facilities Plan:
Attached as Exhibit D is the 1997-98 Capital Facilities Plan of the school district. .
Representatives trom the school district will be available to identify changes in the revised capital
facilities plan, explain the need for revisions to the fee schedule and to answer questions from the
committee.
List of Exhibits:
A. Draft Resolution for School Impact Fees
B. Annual Report/School Impact Fee Account
C. Comparison/School Impact Fees
D. 1997-98 School District Capital Facilities Plan
G M:del\l\¡ncl11os\Jand use
. RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTOÑ" ADOPTING THE SCHOOL
IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE FOR 1998-99
WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature passed the Growth Management Act of 1990
and 1991, RCW 36.70A ~ gq. and RCW 82.02 ~ gq. (the "Act"), which authorizes the
collection of impact fees on development activity to provide public school facilities to serve new
. .
development; and
WHEREAS, the Act requ~ that impact fees may only be collected for public facilities
which are addressed by a capital facilities element ora comprehensive land use plan; and
WHEREAS, the District has prepared a capital faciliti~ plan in compliance with the Act
which has been adopted by the City of Federal Way as a sub-element of the City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan by Ordinance No. 95-248; and
WHEREAS. the City of Federal Way has adopted Ordinance No. 95-249, as amended by
Ordinance No. 97-293, for the assessment and collection of school impact fees upon Certain new
residential developments on behalf of the District; and
WHEREAS, OrdiIÍance Nos. 95-249 and 97-293 authorize the City Council to adopt an
impact fee schedule based upon the school impact fee calculation formula and other information
provided by the District; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 97-239 amended Resolution No."95-222 to include the school
impact fee schedule previously adopted by the City Council; and
RES #
, PAGE 1
EXHIrr-nL.¡, ~
fEY: II. .
~Þ~Ci~~f' . ~
H"H-->'""'"'---', "
-"H_'",,---------------.----------------
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed fee schedule and other.
information submitted by the: District, and made appropriate adjustments to the fee schedule
previously adopted in Resolution No. 97-246;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL W A 'y
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section I. J mpact Fee Schedule Adoption. The fee schedule setting forth the
calculation and amounts of school impact fees to be collected pursuant to Chapter 14, Article VI,
Section 14-213 afthe Federal Way City Code shall be and hereby is adopted. A copy of the fee
schedule is âttached to this Resolution as Exhibit A.
Section 2. Amendment of CitY of Federal Way Schedule of Fees and Charges.
Section Twenty of Resolution No. 95-222, as amended by Resolution No. 97-239, shall be further
amended as follows:
SECTION TWENTY. IMPACT MITIGATION.
Type of Fee
Amount
School Impact Fee
*
*
As adopted by the Federal Way City Council in Resolution No. 98-- and authorized by
City Ordinance Nos. 95-249 and CJ]-293 (a copy of the impact fee schedule is available in the City
Clerk's Office or the City's Department of Community Development).
Secti?n 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution
should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase' of this resolution.
RES #
, PAGE 2
EXHIBIT A
PAGE á OF ~
. .
Section 5. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective ten (10) days from
the date of its passage.
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDEML WAY,
. WASHINGTON, this
day of
, 1998.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MA YOR, RON GINTZ .
ATTEST: .
CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, LONDI K. LINDELL
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
K:\RESO\SCHIMFEE.'n
, PAGE 3
EXHIBIT A
PAGE~OF ~
RES #
"""",,-......-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
r
f
I
I
. . Evl-llBIT A 6f' ~~(!7JlJf-c~
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #210 - 19f7}/k . U ~~:r.
. CAPITALF~ml~ PAGE-+.-OF ~
Scþool Site Acquisition Cost:
Facility' Cost /
Elementary
Ir High
Sr High
Facility
Student
Factor
Student
Factor'
MFR
CosU
MFR
CostJ
SFR
Acreage Acre Capacity SFR
14.00 $25,000 510 0.3851 0.1078 $264 $74
0.00 $0 787 0.1174 0.0373 $0 $0
0.00 . $0 1,232 0.1064 0.0363 $0 $0
TOTAL $264 $74
Facility
Student
Factor
Student
Factor
Cost!
School Construction Cost:
% Penn FacJ
. Elementary
Ir High
.SrHigh
. ~ Senior Hig
CostJ
S
Facility
Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR FR MFR
97.34% $10,500,000 510 0.3851 0.1078 $7,718 $2,160
97.34% $0 787 0.1174 0.0373 $0 $0
97.34% $1,333,152 100 0.1064 0.0363 $1,899 $648
h is Truman Alternative Schçol Grades 9-12 TOTAL S9,616 2,808
Temporary Facility Cost:
% Temp Fac.
~ talS F
Elementary
Jr High
Sr High
. Facility
Cost
Student
Factor
SFR.
Student
Factor
MFR
Cost!
MFR.
CostI
SFR.
Facility
S'
0 SQ t lze
2.66% $62,368 25 0.3851 0.1078 $26 $7
-
2.66% $62,368 25 .0.1174 0.0373 $8, $2
2.66% $62,368 25 0.1064 0.0363 $7 $2
TOTAL $40 $12
State Matching Credit Calcul~tioD:
. Boeck CostJ Sq. Ft
ElementaIy
Jr Ingh
Sr High
State
Student
Factor.
CostI
CostI
Student
- Factor
SQFt Student Match SFR. MFR 8FR. MFR
$97.23 80 59.894'" 0.3851 0.1078 $1,794 $502
$97.23 0 59.894'" 0.1174 0.0373 $0 $0
$97.23 120 59.894'" 0.1064 0.0363 $743 $254
Total $2,537 $7S6
"
8FR.
Tax Payment Credit CålculatioD
Average Assessed Value (April 98)
Capital Bond Interest Rate (April 98)
Net Present Value of AverageDWclIing'
Years Amortized .
Property Tax Levy Rate
P~DtValueofRèvenueSt~
IMPCIFE 1998
$I22i98
~AM
MFR
$143,979 $34,641
.5.19% 5.194'At
$1,101,581 $265.038
10. 10
$1.47 $1.47
$1,619 $390
Mitigation Fee Summary
Site Acquisition Cost
Permanent Facility Cost
Temporary Facility Cost
State Match Credit
Tax Payment Credit
Sub-Total
Singh~ Family Multi-Family
Residences Residences
$264, $74
$9,616 $2,808
$40 $12
($2,~37) ($756)
(SI,619)' ($390)
S5,764 SI,749
$2,882 $874
S2,882 $874 ~
III-I 5
50% Loca1 Share
~Impact Fee
Year
1996
1997
May-98
Summary of Impact Fees
City of Federal Way
EXHIBIT 15
PAGE_I OF
I
Collected Net Interest Earned
$145,095.00 $1,958.68
Balance Comments
$79,731.53ILocker Bay Removal- Thomas Jefferson and Totem
$307,156.00
$11,076.64
$71,471.47
$326,492.701 Locker Bay Removal- Thomas Jefferson. Lakota & Totem
Saghalle Junior High
$61,672.50
$8,769.25
$0.00
$396,934.45
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEES - CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES. 1997
InvoIce Expenditure
Date Warrant # Project Vendor Type Amount
10/11/96 17294 Saghalie Jr. High LP& H Construction General Contractor 3,524.20
10/11/96 17298 Saghalle Jr. High LP& H Construction General Contractor 28,125.80
4/17/97 17453 Totem Jr. High Tyco Systems General Contractor 5,541.21
5/22/97 17484 lakota Jr. High Jeffrey Greene & Assoc General Architect 736.50
8/7/97 17534 Saghalle Jr. High City of Federal Way Inspection Fee 12,350.00
8/28/97 17540 Saghalle Jr. High LP& H Construction General Contractor 599.12
8/28197 17541 Saghalle Jr. High LP& H Construction General Contractor 12,413.67
9/18197 17574 Totem Jr. High Tyee Systems General Contractor 1,250.31
10/9/97 17606 Thomas Jefferson Sr. High Marine VIew Construct/on GeneraJ Contractor 928.65
11/26/97 17651 Totem Jr. High Tyco Systems General Contractor 6.002.01
- .. - .. .,.----
-'-- - . .. - -
Summary city o( Federal Way Impact Fees 6/19/98
TOTAL
71,471.47
'-'--.--- .---...-.--.----.,.-...-.-.-.-,...
EXHIBIT ,C
PAGE 1 OF &1-
School 'Impact Fee Comparisons
School District
Enumclaw
96. Plan $1,978.00 $1,299.00
97 Plan $1,360.00 $922.00
: ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~)~~~: ~:~: ~: ~:~: ~: ~: ~:~: ~:~:~:~: t.$;M.~;:ø~~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~~t~~~:
Single Family Multi Family
Federal Way
96 Plan $2,594.00 $1,462.00
97 Plan $2,372.00 $1,058.00
.S' .8'~n;':': '.' "M.;L'p"'i"'~""""""""""""o,,'-tn-'ô-O:.;.:ñQ. ............0""$8' ~+Å:'i\ñ-'
:. . : :-EI:':'R*."?'!i~: .'. ~I~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~~)~~~. . ::::::::::::::::... !-~:~~:
Fife
96 Plan $2,134.00 $1,249.00
97 Plan $2,123.00 $1,270.00
.SHS"':p" ................oäo "p.' .I,.o.,.,.o.,.,.o""""""o""'o'+;.;.'.;.n:n-':o' O. """"""~1° '-G:rëi.n:n-'
:._....:..:.~9J?~._.,:.-:..~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~~~~..._,.:::::::::::~.,~~:,,~~:
Highline -
96 Plan $2,572.00 $1,534.00
97 Plan $2,560.00 $1,109.00
~ ~~: ~~p~~H!~: ~:~: ~:~:~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~:} ~ :#~~#~:~:~:}~:~: ~: t~=9~ ~
Issaquah
96 Plan $2,593.00 $1,112.00
97 Plan $2,797.00 $609.00
~ ~~: ~~~p~~ :~~~~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~:~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~ :~~~~~~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~:}1 ;#~~« ~
Kent -
96 Plan $3,640.00 $1,733.00
97 Plan $3,513.00 $1,721.00
~ ~~: ~~~p~~ :~(~~ {:~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~:~: ~: ~:~: ~: ~ :~~t:~~~~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~:}1 ~~:~~~ ~
lake Washington - -
96 Plan $2,917.00 $370.00
97 Plan $3,178.00 $166.00
: ~~: P#~~$~~:~~~:::: ::::::::::: :::::: :::::::~~ r~~~Q~ ::::::: :::::::::$~19:.~Q.:
Northshore
96 Plan $2,424.00 $1,398.00
97 Plan $2,240.00 $1,028.00
:~~: ~~~p~$~~ :~.~~::::: :::::::: :::::: ::::: ::::gç~t}A~: :::::::::: :::::$~t~:
Riverview
96 Plan $1,780.00 $583.00
97 Plan $473.00 $111.00
: ~*~ ~f~ P.~~~~ ~~~~~ ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~~~~w.~9~ ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~ :~~~ ::~~:
Impact Fee Comparison 6/22/98
""".,.".,.,.,.,.,.""""..""......~,.,ù~""".'",.""""
"""""u,~u"""~,.."",,,',"~,'L"'-"""'"""U"""""" """"""'~'=""""".""'"
EXHIBIT - c:
PAGE (ÀOF ~
School Impact Fee Comparisons
Single Family Multi Family
School District
Snoqalmie Valley
96 Plan $3,295.00 . $1,243.00
97 Plan $3,018.00 $918.00
: ~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~:~: ~:~: ~:~:~: ~:~ :~:~: ~: ~ :~: ~t~~~:~: ~: ~ :~:~: ~:~ :~~.#~t
Tahoma
96 Plan $2,401.00 $1,008.00
97 Plan $2,765.00 $1,077.00
o'¡"°S'.:rr.;.:..; . :.:..~';':'ioW':"':':o"""""'oo"""",'.o.o~:.s-""L.p:ftQ' '.'.'.'.o.'.'.o.'¡fobn-.:oiift.
:~ : :~.:...Þ.¥.ò:!~~:I:"-'~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::="-fo)~f:-~ . ::::::::::::::::~~~~~:
96 Average $2,575.00 $1,175.00
,~7 Average $2,400.00 $1,304.00
.it.' oo':p'° '.o.ooo.:.:..;':;:~o' O.'.O.O.'.O.Oo'.O.'.'o'.'oOo'o'.O.O.O"'~'höð-:ñ^".ooo.'.'.:é1° '.ji.ÿ~:'M'
: ~~:..: .~!i!p.~ :~~Q.~::::::::::::::::: :~~~~~:::::::: ::: ~ ~;~:~:.:~~:
Impact Fee Comparison 6/22/98
. "".",..u,.u ",,".'
I
f
I
)
~-J
:]
1
d
..
FEDERAL WAY SCH,OOL DISTRICT
1997/98
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Linda Hendrickson
Holly lsaman
Joel Marks
Ann Murphy
TIm Storvick
SUPERINTENDENT
. Thomas J. Vander Ark
, 1
1
]
J
J
.J
J
J
DEVELOPED BY
Jody Putman, Director, Business Services
Geri Walker, MIS Specialist
I)
;'~
; :
i;
,-
J
J
.EXHIBIT l'
PAGELOF ~S
'~<""'.".""'d""...""".".."..",,,,"""
J
OJ
-I
f
}
~.l
]
J
:,;J
:J
]
: I
~
.J
I
]
]
J
~1
J
"."....,~",.,.H.... ."
SECTION I
SECTION II
SECTION ill
SECTION IV
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #210
1997/98 CAPITAL FA CJLITIES PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................
IN'fRODUCTION..................................................
THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Introduction................ ........ ........ .............................
Inventory of Educational Facilities.............................
Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities....................
Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities..........................
Needs Forecast - New Facilities..............................
Six Year Finance Plan..............................................
MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Introduction.. ....... .... ........... .......... .......... ..... ... ..... ....
Map - Elementary.Boundaries....................
Map - Junior High Boundaries....................
Map - Senior High Boundaries...................
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Introduction. ........................................... .......... .......
Building Capacities................................... ......... .......
Portable Locations...................................................
Student Forecast..... ........... ............ ............ """""""
Capacity Summaries............. ..... ...... .........................
King County Impact Fee Calculations.......................
SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1996/97 :PLAN
.. .,.." ."... .
..
EXHIBIT D
PAGE ~ OF 35
1
ll-IV
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
1-5
1-6
II-I
II-2
II-J
II-4
ill-I
ill-2
ill4
ill-6
ill-8
ill-13
IV-I
INTRODUCflON
Î
In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act
(SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances
of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective
December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective
March 1996, the Federal Way School District has updated its 1996/97 Capital Facilities
Plan as of April 1998.
, -1
f
1
]
""..l
':'
,-
This Plan has been adopted by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way
and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This
plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each
jurisdiction. To date, the City of Auburn and City of Des Moines have not adopted a
school impact fee ordinance.
'.}
1
The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas
Within which urban growt~ can be encouraged. . The Growth Management Planning
Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area
Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the
Federal Way planning area, which encompasses the Federal Way School District
boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban
Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This
Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption.
~~J
.;..1
This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which
requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not
intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare
interim plans consistent with Board policies. Additional plans will be consistent with the
six year Capital Facilities Plan. At this time, the Federal Way School District is evaluating
the need for and possible timing offuture bonds.
."J
TI
1J
]
1
]
]
I
J
J
ii
EXHIBIT D
PAGE¿OF 35
l
..,1
-- !
I
I
o.J
:1
J
~
]
-j
!~J
3
J.
}
]
J
.1
.J.
J
INTRODUCTION (continued)
In October of 1997 the District convened a Study and Survey Committee. The Committee
is made up of patrons, parents, professional consultants, school staff and centi~
administration staff. The charge of the Committee is divided into four focus areas on a
. . continuum, which will lead to recommendation to the Board of Education. The four foçus
committees are:
1. Educational Plan Committee
2. Special Education Committee
3. Classroom Standards and Facility Use Committee
4. Future Alternative Committee
The Educational Plan Committee prepared an Educational and Technology Plan
including information on: District Beliefs, the District Strategic Plan, Technology Plan,
State Goals, Perfonnance Standards, Curriculum Matrix and PrQmotion. This committee
developed a recommendation on grade configuration as it relates to District goals. The
committee is recommending a change in the Federal Way School District grade
configuration to:
K-5
6-8
9 - 12
Elementary Schools
Middle Schools
High Schools
Educational capacity is not a focus for this group. The recommendations are based on
meeting the educational.needs of students to support the District vision that "Every
student will possess a world class set of skills to become a successful participant in
society." The recommendations ftom this group were sent to the Future Alternatives
Committee for further review.
The Special Education Committee developed a series of recommendations for facility
use as it relates to Special Education. The recommendations are based on consideration
of student needs rather than on space for other programs. The committee recommends a
commitment of dedicated space to support services staff for testing and therapy services,
adequate and secure storage for therapy equipment and available office ai:ea for
confidential calls and conferences. The support staff includes Speech and'Language
Pathologists, Occupational Therapists, Physical Therapists and Adaptive Physical
Educational SpeciaHst.
The committee further recommends an increased capacity be dedicated to ECEAP and
Head Start programs to offer services to students and families with full day programs. The
need for three additional classes and one portable over the next five years is forecast for
these students. Additionally the committee forecasts a need for one or more classrooms
dedicated to pre-school in the next five years.
111
EXHIBRT 1)
PAGË~OF 35
¡ -
Introduction (continued)
"J
'r
I
..
Other committee recommendations are to add one more class of Integrated Kindergarten
and First Grade over the next five years, add one more SBD (Severe Behavioral
Disordered) within five years and finally that space is provided for the services the school
has selected to provide for the Special Education population such as Resource Rooms.
The Future Alternatives Committee will consider these recommendations.
The facility recommendations of this committee and forecast of increased need are
footnoted in the formula for future capacity needs in the 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan.
ECEAP, Head Start and Pre-School are not a part of the district student population
forecast, although the district does provide facilities and services to these programs.
.. )
,J
The Classroom Standards and Facility Use Committee is tasked to examine all
. facilities to determine the ability to meet the educational programs of the Federal Way
School District for the next ten years. A part of the process is to develop a target
population for each building. The cominittee is establishing a capacity at each building
that meets the educational needs of current programs. The committee studied projections
for five years to identify where capacity would not be sufficient for projected enrollment.
The capacities established by this committee form the basis of the capacity analysis in the
1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan. Additionally the committee studied community use of the
Federal Way Schools and reviewed the format for Building Condition Evaluations.
.. f
J
~
-..1
The final committee, which will formulate the Board Recommendations, is the Future
Alternatives Committee. This committee is studying the reports nom the other three
groups to ascertain how the recommendations will meet the District Strategic Plan and
Grade Span expectations. The committee will consider the impact of school calendar,
schedules, class size, technology, the impact of special education and day care. They will.
also examine the impact of Choice Schools, extended day and extended year concepts,
Running Start and transportation issues. The outcome of this study will be a
recommendation to develop a District alternative configuration plan. The committee
expects to bring a recommendation to the Board of Education in September of 1998.
-j
~
:]
J
J
J
J
I
J
J
. .
The Federal Way School District Board of Education will review the recommendations of
the Future Alternative Committee. If the Board adopts a new configurati'o~ the capacity
analysis of the Capital Facilities Plan will be updated.
On January 13, 1997 the Board of Education adopted a ten-year Real Estate Plan. This
plan deals with long~term use of current land and the acquisition of additional land to meet
student population projections in the 20-year planning window. The plan recommends
surplusing land that is not deemed suitable for school construction for any reaso~ and the
purchase of one additional elementary site. The District is currently reviewing options for
the purchase of this additional site.
iv
EXHBB~I .D
PAGE ; OF 36
'. 'O_'~-~"-"""""..w'""'~'.."-'"..'. .. "",..""..""....
J
"J
- ~
"I
.. J
]
]
J
~1
J
)
]
J
J
.J
J
!
I
SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACn.ITIES PLAN
The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of infonnation,. be gathered to
detennine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community.
This section provides infonnation aboútcurrent facilities, existing facility needs, and expected
future facility requirements for the Federal Way School District #210. This is followed by a
Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and update
modernization needs listed.
" }
J
EXHIB~T .D
PAG ElL OF -'5
I-1
INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ee
Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023
.'l Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023
Camelot 4041 S 298th Street . Auburn 98001
Enterprise 35101 5th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023
1 Green Gables 32601 41th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023
Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001
Lake Grove 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023
I Lakeland 35615 32nd Avenue S Auburn 98001
Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003
Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th Street Auburn 98001
..J Mirror Lake 625 S 314th Street Federal Way 98003
Nautilus 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 98003
Olympic VIew 2626 SW 321th Street Federal Way 98023
] Panther Lake 34424 1st Avenue S , Federal Way 98003
Rainier VIew 3015 S 368th Street Federal Way 98003
Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023
1 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023
Star Lake 4014 S 21Oth Street Kent 98032
~,j Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Avenue S Kent 98032
Twin Lakes 4400 SW 32Oth Street Federal Way 98023
Valhalla 27847 42nd Avenue S Auburn 98001
Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003
Woodmont 26454 16th Avenue S. Des Moines 98198
.1 nnuORHIGHSCHOOLS
Dlahee 36001 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003
Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001
U Lakota 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023
Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003
Saghalie 33914 19th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023
J Totem 26630 40th Avenue S Kent 98032
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
. J Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023
Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Federal Way 98003
Thomas Jefferson. 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001
J ALTERNA TIVE SCHOOLS
Merit School 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003
J Harry S. Truman High School 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003
.J D
J EXHIB~T
I-2
PAGE 1 OF,6
J
\
I
J
J
1
]
-J
}
~j
J
J
J
J
J
]
j
.j
J
J
I Site # I
9
23
35
40
63
71
72
84
96
.. ,.",.".."......,.......",.,,". ."""c""..,"~...._..."".""uU.'..._.
CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES
Develooed Prooertv
Administrative Building
MOT Site
Central Kitchen
Federal Way Memorial Field
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
31405 18th Avenue S
1066 S 32Oth Street
1344 S 308th Street
1300 S 308th Street
98003
98003
98003
98003
Undeveloped Prooertv
Location
27th Avenue SW & Dash Point Road
SW 36Oth Street & 3rd Avenue SW
S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S
E of 10th Avenue SW Between SW 334th & SW 335th Streets
E of 47th Avenue SW & SW 314th Place
S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S
36600 block of Pacific Highway S
3737 S 36Oth Street
S 308th Street & 14th Avenue S
Notes:
Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements.
Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the
District." "
1-3
EXHIB~T .D
PAGE 1 OF ,5
.',. ........,..",.....,.
J
I
-\
Î
I
~ I
.J
1
i
NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES
EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS
Truman High School , Modernization with (1)
expansion
Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity (1)
Portables
Notes:
(1)
Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues or
non-voted debt issues.
'J
pl.".
g
:-'1
J
',j
]
]
]
J
]
1-4
EXHIBMT j)
PAGE. q OF 35
¡
,I
I
'-,
'J
]
J
¡J
:J
~
]
'j..
"
~
]
J
]
J
J
J
J
. ---'-'--"-"'--""."""
NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES
Notes:
(1)
(2)
"--'-'----'-'--".....-,,-..-.....--..
LOCATION
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Construction of Maintenance, Operations and Transportation (MOT) site is dependent on
sale of current MOT site.
Anticipated source offunds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues or
non-voted debt issues.
I-5
EXHIBIT j)
PAGE,1!LOF 35
î
J
J
]
~
..J
J
]
]
J
]
J
J
J
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1#210 - 1997198CAPITAL FACILmES PLAN
Six Year Finance Plan
0>
Secured Fundi"lg
Sources 1998 ,1m 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total Revenue
mpKt Fees (1) $ 700,000 $23.754 $723.754
.8IICI Sale Funds (2) 52.22S.000 51,191.132 5781,021 52S0.000 568.191 55.123.051
\ale Milich Funds (3) 54,950.600 SI.I05.000 5811.898 S6,867.49811
roT AL $7,175,600 S1,5H,Ðl Sl,623,610 S1SO,ooo SG8,1'1 SO SI1.714,3U I
Sources
S4,800.
SI5.000.
SI,OOO,
51.295,13
SZ1,O95,133
NEW SCHooIS 1998 1m 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total Cost B
Newlilem~Sitc (11). 5600,000 5~
New Blcmenl8ry ScMoI 56,300.000 54,200,000 . 5 1 o.soo.
MODERNJZA. nON AND EXP ~ON
IUIIIIß Seniar Hiøh (Altenlllin) 53,233.680 52,155.717 55.319.~
TEMPORARY FACIL1TIES
Portables (8) .. 51,122.624 56"23.680 5561.312 52,307.611
edera1 Way AC8dcmy (10) 5374,208 5374,201
011ŒR
;.rcty ImJXll'ClDents (9) 54.125,600 54.125.600II
ecilitics Dep81mcnt 52SO,000 52SO,000 S2SO,000 S2SO,000 52SO,000 S2SO,000 SI.soo.00ct
cchnology System ImJXll'cments LibnrySystem 5soo,OOO 56SO,000 56SO,000 51.800,00011
cchnology System ImJXll'cmcnts MIS l'Joject 51.600.000 5600,000 5100.000 52,300,00011
roT AL $7,175,600 S1,5H,ID1 Sl,623,610 SZ5O,OOO SIO,344,992 56,605,787 S1',5H,1tll
NOTES:
1. These rees are ~ bcina held in. Kina ~ and. City oCFccIenl Wwy impact ree --. and will be
8vaalable rar use by the District rar system impnwcments.
2. These I\IncIs COllIe Iiom nn- sales orland and- set aside ror cstimllled expenditures.
3. Guanntced slate match reimbursements.
4. These funds, iC ICCIII'Cd. wiD be _d rar f'uIure II'Ojects.
5. These are projected rees baed.upon known resicIenbù ~elopments in the DÌS\rict over the next six years.
6. These I\IncIs - II'Ojcdcd slate m atdüns fimcIs.
,. These IùncIs are projedCd land ale income.
B. These f'ecs rcpraent the cost or movin¡ mil siting cxisIin¡ por1abIcs. The District mwy choose 10 purchase new
portabJcsin the)'en shown. This estimate mwyalso include the.cost ofpurch8sing these portables.
9. These projects have been approved by the Bo8rcI orDirccton mil coyer most schools. These projects do not increase C8p8CÌty.
1 O. Federal W wy Academy is . junior lüsb prosr8I'II which will increase C8p8CÌty 8t one junior hip åte.
11. This site is 18r¡cr!haft 1 0 acres.
EXHIBIT D
PAG[~:_Lf__OF 3~
r..... ,.
~
):12 PM
1-6
I
I
. 1
j
.:J
]
J
~
]
,.:.J
;}
~
]
J
]
J
..l
J
J
SECTION n - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
.'
The Federal Way School District (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades
K-6), six junior high schools (grades -7-9), three senior high schools (grades 10-12) and two
alternative schools (grades 7-12) for the 1997/98 school y~. On April 20, 1996 the Fed~ral
Way School District Board of Education adopted the boundaries for these schools. The
following maps show the service area boundaries for each school for each grade level (the
alternative schools, Hany S. Truman High School and Merit School, serve students fÌ'om
throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in
grade configuration or adoption of programs which affect school populations may necessitate
a change in school service areas.
The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public. facility
inftastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public
" facilities~ new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that
development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities
available~ interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries
can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities.
Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It
is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools.
Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school.
It is important to realize that" a single housing development does not require the construction
of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the
district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not ju~
around a single development.
.. .
II-l
EXHRBmr j)
PÁGE-L~_,OF Mi
...,.............,...........................
I.
i
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES
I
(
'-
....J
E F -- '-- G ~ I H
.-n- '--\-'-~~I~£;;~;~~--:~\: .ít.""".".-----/Ñ. .---.:~.:-\
! \ ¡J~¡I'~ ~~r: , ~~, ~~~: ¡'
ELEMENTARYSCHOOtS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOtS z-.ç~:.. . ,_.: ._-~:~ - ' . 1/, :~ ij.J¡~ ;(, . ~L
. 1 . ~II 1 ,I n~w~ ' . .,~7:- ~.-,
~;-~alde C-6 :;:I:~ E.9 j~~~~f ."~. . '::18..... -~'" J
16 Brlgadoon B-8 66 Kilo G-6 :l ~l~ W ~ ).~ . \,Bi """.&::l
~~ ~=:~ ~~ :~ ~:_a ~ -=: :,,'. "',' ,..:! 3;WI~'~:' 'I" ~~'" "1'
14 Green Gab'" A.7 70 Saghalle C-8 .' ,
~~ :::== ~ s: ::;:: ~~w.::: ~~, ,,:;: : ::¡ iL;
33 Lakelancl F.9 - . . r~;;;--. . ~ = . ¡ , . ! =' ;7' '¡
2: :':~:~II S SENIORHIGHSCHOOtS J i-' ¡:~~'. 'r&!1-7' i ;~. .-' "',_.-,' ,'~ -~ ¡i 1 j
5 Nautilus E-5 Code.. . I ,:".'. ~ . ;.. ~ ¡
15 OIymplcV\ew C-7 ~. ~' ! -'. - '-==~I- ¡ ¡
21 Panther Lak. E-8 80 Oec¡Itur C-6 rr:l""W: t ..-. .
37 RalnlerV\ew F.10 81 FecleralWay E-5 ' ".(; J IF 'I. -= ¡ - ',", \,. I
41 Shetwood Forest D-8 83 Thomas Jefferson ~ i i..!f] ., ¡, -. .1", I
24 Silver Lake 0.7 ...... .' -
26 Star Lake G-3 : :: s. Truman '. =~ ..- / I< ,.' :I.¡.ç<~ r-l-:;C1BJ,~ :
-- 25 Sunnycrest G.2 ~ .~~ J.-.;'.l "<n:.;J":rF- n ~ ~'
~; ~::::,~kes ~ , Future School Sites - ~ .# . -";¡tJ ~ . 11,-'~. ~: I ~ :
7 WIldwood F-5 Surplus Sites - ,;:- ' 1}. -:z. ~ . ¡E;:~ "¡ . -:-::: ¡ 4
1 WoodInont F-3 ... .-.r' ..- ." .
1 00 EducatlOl1llI Service Center F-6 ¿. . . . , - ~ . ~ . - '
99 FutureSupport ServIces E-8 = Code-. ..... . ... '. " . ... . - . ! . !I ;¡ '" - -..!' .=,~ TV ~1-
97 Malntenance.()peratl_.TraMportation e-6 ...~ ,.- , . , . , ~ î 111
~ Parks - - ~ ~.~ '-: ..~.. . ".." ~~'" . -. . : --a .' -:t. '. ~,., ~S
I.. -- . :........ . II¡¡"- ~"Ic.-:-' -.. 1 .
.:..' T A I B ì" """. - "'ñ:fln~-" - I
~ FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON and V/'~IN, 1 :~i ,J ~::' "~. "=' -;: -,~: .." - , ""'. .... ~
,'. 1.0' _I ~ n~:'- . ... :~ '-. ~-
so- -jj~~I;~u -, .,' .--
or', - . -.- ,," -'-' ~ -.' -,,' t'-
~ ,. .I-~"'- ~ l~~ ..1 . 11 ~~t~~ =~~.' ,. ~ I .ï"
~'-1~' .1 . ... . ~ . . -~-""J¿(3 ".¡ . ,'-¡-' .-.
. --"-.. . .,.a!!.o......... .. ~, ,f. ,- ,¡;
I ..~ '. -- { I ... . ...- . '\" ¡¡;;...... ", JI.':!Jíl .~..;" ...:"""'~ lo.
6 --r, - ..: i-'" '. ..,. . .-. ~. , F
... ~. C " "". , .. "-' ::::. :'~'" 1i iI.. I : .' , I :
,'-- ~"..' 'It!~ . :;:;~, "":¡: ,,":,,'-:;.; :.: ,'~~ ~!~!~. :~'H 6.
c.. .::'<~ . . ~ - - '-' . ;! / I
.. .. . ~. .. '(11"'" ~ ¡;¡O" I
-- . ." ~ .. ~ n.~ ~~..~I' ~ I!....,,' . 7
~ -~. ..' ~SU . .;~ ~~~Y;-_L~" ~ -C":;, " -. ~. - ;:: ,
, ::\:. ., - - ' :. >1&E '. - ' --'W-Yo -"':' . ~ r
1=\1. - .. . .: -- : ? ! ,L.: 'WE ';- Fr.",,' .' . ¡. '. :~ ~ '
,,~ ~.:.=- .."~i::1:. ..... '" .:.~ ~1~:1"'" $1 h."'.' ;r /'.- ~ :ë "=1): f¡ Ii ~~:Ì4:. . 11:-
"," -:.~ ~mrn ~ ~ . .~I ~~ .':~~,tl" . "", ? ~-~~~þ.~~1!- ~¡~ h
--'.._- ,,-~ . ..- ..1<-.1 .rT~ . - . 'H~"".
....J --.- " ; . I .
~~ ¡ .. _.."~..-.' .. :' ",I.:. ,",:" III ....... ......
. . . . . 0 <\...~... ~.; æu.1~' '. ¡f! \ ...- . .. ..A/' .: ~.~II-:I,~ -~ I" 'I 0
-........-.. ""'ò I æ;. " . - . --',.tn ;':b~ o:¡.. ~
~ Ji ,I~! =~:P.. ,~~ ; l ~ ,1.3: .
. ,,>< " ;: VW;¡ '~."~ ~¡ 'k"-! =~
110""" r.' '; .~~¡. ~-j. ~lI/dft
i ~ ~ !¡' J !¡! :; ¡: IY DnD
Federal Way Public Schools I~, ':"'l~;: I' ,- ~! =ïin ~ ~ ~ ~~
........ Hod""" ..... r.J.- I ~ Î I ..... ,rr ([ ff),
:.:.."':~=- (253) 945-2000 " ~,...." E"'UOH I F--- I G "'~=-H ¡ ca ~
11-2 ~ 'q ~t
W~
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210
,.
_.
...
I
.,.1
~
.
..
J
E F -- ,-......G .. J. H
UU\~~~~;;.~{ .C:.:.uuC .q"':~-'-~ 1
'. ~';Fi r~~~,¡~, I~~:» I
~SCHOOIS =;"SCHOOIS -,(í ,~;;I.' ¡ .;:n ~¡: .IIV;~' ~/..' :
~: ==...;: :: ::.:-- ~ 2 ¡.1 ~.~:~. tr. ~;j':: , ~ ~ .-';'tRJ '~",h~ 2
28 Camelot Q.5 62 Lakota 1).6 :L . ¥ ~ . .f't:.';.'¡ ~
22 EnI8rprise ).8 61 S8c8j11wea E-5 - ,~ . . ."',J¡i -"'" Ji ~ q. .' ""; ""'!i. ,
14 GnMn Gables A-7 70 Sap!1e C.a ~ . - ~-I'M'~¡ N ~ . j . ; . ¡
30 Lak8 Dolloff G-6 65 Totem G-3 ""'" "i:" ~:' r- r¡ .-. ~¡ .' ~ 'Ji "
11 LakeG- 1).6 6 Merit F" ~ ;;; ~ -' .,~. " ..- ~.. S258SO ¡
33 Lakeland F-B ' -;~. l ;;E~' , . ! -. ,.:Jj!P !Mio :
2 M8rkT_ln F... .:: . ¡ ,..4;:" ; . . ¡:':.' 'j ~ ¡
29 MenIdIth HIlI H-5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOlS J '- t.!! v:... ....' 'N, .' ¡ j
-.. II MfmwLak8 E" ¡ .. , .... ... '-"..:
5 Nautilus E-5 Code - . ~ I .;.. ~ ~ . . ;.. . ¡
'. ~~ ~.-:~~.: 80 o.c.tur c.. J~. J!!P-.I ! ~ '-~ ¡~ i ¡
31 RaInlerView F.10 81 FedenoIWIIY E-5 MJ d,ll' ... .J. 11.. ' :
- 41 Sh8rwood F_t 1).6 83 Thoma Jefferson G-4 --t--' :J..!ß; , .. s...-ai Fî \\ .
: ~~ :: . : :.::: 50 TRlllllln ~~ I ..- JP."",-' . I .}.~ :~~ri-:;L.!b- ~ ¡- .
....;. 25 Sunnycrnt. G-2 ~J_.EI ~,..: 1 " .~ "':n: : ! '.... \ .
rr Valhal18 G-4 Future School SItes -;;; ." ,.' ~ ~.' ': ¡T.. '-:' .1;.. ; of
7 WIldwood F-5. Surplus SItes - ;.. , !:¡¡ ... - ¡ -, -- ¡'., .
1 Woodmont F-3 ' - ... t. .~ "-. .
100 ~ServlceCenter F" ~ . ~ . . ':--, ' - .t! ~ '
99 Futur'-Support S8Mc:ø E.a - Cocle-. ...- . i.... . ".'...i"" ~ ":¡':-!!!!!: Þ i¡
- 97 M8lnt8nance-Openttl--Tr8,.port8Øon E" - ~~.... . "If , - - .UI' -, . ., ~ . ~ J~I
ParIc8 D ,- -~ . ~ . . _.; .
-"- - '. ;', - ., "" . I~~.:::- - i ::' .:.!I 7. 1 0 t" '
.... I If -I B J C . .. - ~- ~~- ~ tJ, .' .
,". 1..-". 11 ~ :: . ."" ~ "'0' '.. -' . 0' ~
-- P' I - ~~' ;----;: ,. II ~ tiiøt.,,:,!,;.' ~~~~ ~ I .ïll -
,I ,,' I. """'.'"!!}.; "..i, .1;-'--'
.. 6 _..~ ::::.. .. I .. ~ ~~~~"~"""" '. ;,-~..::ri: ;. "" ~~.gßIt. ,... '~.; '-,; i. 1..-
...- =..:;¿"'~~.. o~~/'" ~. ~-11 I . ~"'~'er;~ t-
.. . , ...... ! . ", a '., .' 6-
. r 2li' f#Jj -- .-.. . J '-.' ; - ...........
" !.= ~ ~ =.,-¡¡ - -¡¡.- "1~' .'...: . -::- i-=~ y . ' \. R j
-:.c,... --;\", .. -. - :.... . .'-_.._j~ . " .-. ~ :Iood -tJ) .
~ A'~ "~""':"~ , ... . '":t ~ . -.oj \ ~ 4' ~ :¡ IJ
.. 7 I.' : ,,: ;.'" - ~'l~; In. j~t..~:: . ~ r' :.. N I . f
.- . . . ., "':': i ~¡ :i'~1 ',' . .-.' -'~. 7
. ,. ., s.:: . '
~ . . ".:-.....,.:.. ~~ .- . '~'1ir.Í-i~... . ""'~'~~."'O'" ...~",.
~- 7 /-: :..", '. ':..\¡: I.. ¡~ . - '--.. ';""..;. 'DLIo ~ #. «
. B II ~J ,- - ',.. . ." .
.N '.. 1- .' ~.' ~ ... .~ ¡ ,,_":.'p,.~~.!J' .!
~ E B ""'1 0 I ~ ~ ~ -~"'rm ,::, ~ .il) ~-J, """":;' ~~"..~~;~ M "Is ( I-I
~ ~ ¡!!:J"" ~I! :,. /~A ¿"'- 'I.~;.~.. V)
1 . . - . 'i'.3z:u, :~" ¡;-~~. It)
S::v" . .' -- i r-"~ ~ ~~ I'~ ,.I.. . "Î!~ ß'.:£1r:_., ,.. !
I . I ~ /,. IIUL, ~ ~s~'Ø' " . ~l ¡-
."Of ",.. .. 1"I__i. .., . ':,' -. UI!!..I.. 'I
~-::::=:- ".ò¿1 -" ~~ ~1"'- "<A", s .'. .. ,I ". ~:. .J!". .. " '. LL
--...-- i:'ì:! . -. . .. ...' I . ß ,~ 0
--- . ,. I ~.; . . . '. -"'ij II~.. -, 9
. . . . . '~~'" ~~ . ~ ~.~. '" 1i =>. ::~':t .l .Arr.~iw. .;~".. I -
--...... - '\L~ .~ au.. . 'Ii 0 if .~~. '-,. .~_. G t :
~ /'0 ... .' ,- .'i" :u¡:. ;"1{ ~ ~: 10 ~ 1f/j"'i
.~~ I - ~'_,I"I!l-.J,!!.....~ ~~
, ',~ Federal Way Public Schools !~, ...u":: ¡ - ~ ¡ .::1/in ~ ~I~ ~
......... A FoaI.1n . ! ';0, .J.., , "I ¡ 3M ... , I []. ft
:::'..."'::;-..:=-- (253) 945-2000 II ElF .., I G ......::::t :::;:-H = p~
Junior High School Boundaries
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210
]
1
J
,
.-'
...
II-3
-
Senior High School Boundaries
I
.
E F -- ,-- G " J H
,~\,~~:j~;;;~i\ (~~~~::~_u-:N~. -~_u.:~:-L
,\~:ç;þ, ~I ~..~~..-, '4. ~~i"_\ I/~' :
Z-L¡- ¡ .. ..." I.".;
,;- .',..'-=~'-. I"'~'; ,. 'l~
Code--. Code-- . :,¡U 1 ~I Imil~¡:- ~ .' ..,::'-- ~i' ;
:: =-;: :: =- ~ , ,!,~~~:~ 11°'~' ~":",,~~2
28 Camelot G-5 62 Lakota D-6 :~. . , 1Çt '._d ¡~J.~,!J :;;;. ~t¥i.è
22 Enterprise 1>-9 61 Sacajawea E-5 "=:: .~ ,",;' r l ¡ . 0 ..;
H ~F:=t E ~ =I~ E 0; I#Ë:::I:~~~:~ -¡j~"" ~:i -~¡ . j " :
33 Lakeland F-9 :. ,.5',' ;.1 ;:1:=1: " :::', 0:1' :
~ ::,;:a~~" ~~ SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS ;~ .9' I.u:~~/-~~~ ::;~ ~ ..., ... ..... J'p ijl ¡ J
- 6 Minor Lake E-6 J 'F--.," Fr'I,~....." ~¡ .'- :
5 Nautilus E-5 Code - . ! ,:..' :;¡ - 0 '. . ¡
'.- ~~ ~~~ ~1 80 Dec,tur C-6. ~', ~J' ; -. - -;' i ¡
37 RalnlerView F-10 81 FederalWay E-5 . MJ ; Jol' 0' -; 11. 'It. ::
-.., 41 SherwoodForest D-8 83 ThomasJelferson G-4 L~; -iii ...... :9' \"'1 -
-.: 24 SilYet:Lake 1>-7 8 Harry 5- Truman F-6 I ...... # ~ I 'I~ ..1') lij,',J~-~Þ' '\
26 Star L,ake G-3 , 8 MerIt F-6 Ii .""'" # . . . . :..<¡f; .;ïe!:1 ~~'w<-~""" ;
. 25 Sunnycrest G-2 ,£ ,~ r---.} . «ñ-. ' j!.~ it+-
......J 13 TwinLakes B-6 -I' ..." . ';';¡ . ~.. '! ¡ iI.1iI'~ D-:
27 Valhalla. G-f Future School Sites - l1li. ,- ~ ..!':t ~ ~'¡'- r~ .~. I -'~:"'. ; 4-
., 7 WIldwood F-ð SurpiusSites - ;:- 1),j -~ -, -, ii : .-. '
1 Woodmont F-3 ::. 0 -='" ¡
J 100 Educational ServIce Center F-6 - . ,,'- . . . I... ':-. .' 03 -.,",: :zøi :
97 Malntenanc:e-Operatlons-Transportatlon E-6 ~~.. þo ~m .71i1:- . 11
..., ~ ;;; \,,", '. 0 ~ -. . . -p. ,-.. ..
f'.iJ Parks- ,_! 1:-.: ii~ ~_. ~',~, ~-' 0, . ..:::: ..-~:t-.-. 1-1" 0 ~j'
....:. I A I B I ~ \_~; I ...'...- -:::'-:.' . "-, ~~ 1\.: ,iI-I' I
" FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON.nd VICIN~! ,W,~. "G:~!'" -:: -:.-. -::.~. ... --. I -~ ~
,-' ,_,rf. Is.... ~ji~~f~~o.":~:' '. -: , ~!~¡ 1 ~ -~~ -~: .~o .. t°.r' -
..J I ~._..~ ';'¡~', '7i:!!u!~ . fj;l! -i! - II ~ t~~.i,';' :~~~. ~ jt . I OJ' ,!
'J: .'.' ~~'-'..-.'-~ ~1jj1i ~ - ('t... 1~~":'1I' ...~;".~'=~';.I :L~-~;ë~ o"~::'~¡~'-" :f"'", 0_'
6 .1 ~"t;A. .. \.. I .,~- 1,,:ow:!.' .....;.', ~~ m .I! ~. "" ~ - . ~ ~
' ,.,.~f'/. '::J ....~~) \;' .~ ~~.Iiiil1~ "'r~w. ~!_.13 ~ I ...., . I . :~. , ',;1" = 6
. "'.,'. _."~ ""'-~~'f¡¡.o" ~'~: . - 1:1 ~i -... ... ¡~i" ":=='~= 0
: , fr\!i",. .- ::::¡¡ ,,"-",- --a -' - If', r---I! ":Y "f-U'2-~
.- -,: _.E- .° ~L ~'t.w(".fot~/=-: .:- !::.::JJ-::-:f'" ...... '\~ ~ ~
J . . ~J:~.'~)" -- ' ,'" ~~~: ~.- - '. ~~" _._~ .-. ~\ \ .- -=t p) ¡
'C't~-; :~~:~. : 5'. ':-:~ .'" ~-;'--~.. :;~.: .~,.;. i~~Jjl 11.:.::.~~~\~~¡\¡,~,;:: '~'. I
" I '.?"'" -. ,'0'", .' ,. \\I~. . .
--, I - ,0 . ~;~! .. ~.~. .;; J :;r~¡ ~,,~. ._~ o~ 7
. . .~, . . '1 ' ..' j '_0' ,
~----,'- -"" "/. - ~ ::-":~t:"""~~~ ~.~;.~-;~\;!L: \..~ ,~~ r .':,~- - ~'~;~#.'>"'~" ~. ~" ii 17¡"-'" .~
J N : B l1li .:;--. L~ ,... : -.- :..~ ...: I.
-. .~ ~ .~~ - o~~, Á~ =-ft.~:;~ ~i. j 11. ::::::::::'} . ~...::¡òf~~:t=~. I: ~ 8
W ~ E 8 ~~ ' ---"1-:,: 4" ~ a.1 ~ ¡¡j tJ ~~u~&3~ \ ¡
.J ~ 11 -h :. """, ~,. '....' ~I.;.. .. ;( /\ "'1~~ I ~~![:'.51-I-'~ ~.... ...
Fv. .~~ ,:.0 - ',' Uil1.~-',: :' "':.: ,\:: !... .-...LJi"f ..-t.¡ ~ 'I.. !
s . ,.~ '-"{Jab.. .' ~ "..: ~ - ...., ;+--
" ..... . ..... " ~':. r r !"""=¡: ! ~ 1" ..... I: / . - '.' . I
]' '3E;:' ,;, il 1:1 :¡ :J ~ . -..' =/ = ~~ :::2': ~ .. ~ IJ, '-, ~ . - ~~:_~;¡ ~
: -::.=::- ~ ~ 0 ,.;~ ~~~,. .,: .. .~,': ~l4'J¡~ "~' ~~ "'. ' -"1. I ¡J~~ ~~-:1J.9 g' 9
.. ." ,. .. ~l AI
' ..'". '~ -"";'- ... ",'- ..... .
, . . I . '..~ ':'.;,':..~, ':;!! .. ~: ~. or, 0:. : : I
J , ~ ;!!7 r ~..~'~<4~~.~~~ J..~~/:¡;{:co~'-~ in ~
~ I ~ -- }.LI!I.II, .~: -. PIü!J..f .... f".... --
J I/O ¿: ~....¡o :.¡< ~",/O~
. .'4ì ~ Fed~ral Way Public Schools I~. M':~:: I'~ ~ ,-. i3 '~! ~ ~~ :¡ ~; r::!:::;~¿.; ~~ ~
"""'1 .. FIriI.¡" I . . .... eo:.... -'. '1 ì ¡3M.. , ?"-:-
.---- (253) 945-2000 11 ""-' MOL"" I -~~ _. ....!"~-- - ::
'-"'W...W'- E F G -r - H .Ú
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
II-4
b
LL
I
w
~
~ :c
..
,-',.. ,. .......,.,..... .."'"
.__..._~~......._..................,
"""-"---..........h.....C_..C.-.-..,........,-,._C.-.......-
,)
"]
'J
jj
~J
:]
']
~
]
:J
Ð
]
"1
]
J
"" J
j
J
SECTION ID- SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
. .
Building Capacities - The Education Program
Portable Locations
Student Forecast - 1998 through 2003
Capacity Summaries
King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units
.-.."
111-1
EXHIBfT- .Þ
PAG~ "'~OF ~.
BuiJding Capacities
I
"I
J
.J
]
J
~-.-..
~ '
"
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard .of service" in order to ascertain
the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent ofPubJic Instruction establishes
square footage guideJines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the
education program needs. The District has identified a BuiJding Program Capacity for each of
the schools in the District. This FuJI Time Equivalent (FTE) capacity is based on:
.
the number of classrooms. available in each school
any special requirements at each school
the contracted class load by grade level
.
.
In general, the District's current standard provides that the average class size for a standard
classroom'for grade K is 24 students, for grade 1-6 is 26 students, grades 7-12 is 25 students,
Gate classrooms are 25 students, individual education programs classrooms are 15 students,
and sp~cial education classrooms are 12 students. This size is determined based upon current
ratios and trends as weJl as the-. classroom physical size. Educational Program Capacities
change every year. This analysis is for the 1997/98 school year. The capacity of an individual
school could and does change at any time depending on program changes which may require
additional space.
.....t
]
g
]
OJ
]
J
J
J
J
III-2
EXHIBIT 1)
PAG rE-LL OF 3S"
f
]
: }
'..1
J
~
.:':.1
1
J
~:J
~;J
PI
11
]
"'.:).
,
]
J
,.1
j
J
'.
Portable Locations
The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic
education. It is not efficient" use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for
500 students due to lack of space for 2S students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the
year and ftom year to year.
Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until
pennanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When pennanent
facilities become available, the portable{s) is either moved to another school for an interim
classroom, or used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs. Some
portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District
may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and
philosophy of the Federal Way School District that portables are not acceptable as pennanent
. facilities. '
The foll~wing page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary
educational facilities by the Federal Way School District.
111-4
EXHIBIT ..D
PAGE 1<6 OF ~ó
I
/
-hI
.--.,
I
~
'...
~
J
1
ill
]
j
]
J
J
]
J
Capall
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #210 -1997/98 CAPITAL FACll..ITIES PLAN
BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES
ELEMENTARY BUD..DING
PROGRAM CAPACITY
Adelaide 488
Brigadoon 528
Camelot 374
Enterprise 516
Green Gables 502
Lake Dolloff 512
Lake Grove 476
Lakeland 488
Mark Twain 503
Meredith Hill 502
Mirror Lake 398
Nautilus 568
Olympic View 449
Panther Lake 514
Rainier View 476
Sherwood Forest 550
Silver Lake 528
Star Lake 502
Sunnycrest 462
Twm Lakes 502
Valhalla 494
Wildwood 428
Woodmont 442
1998 TOTAL 11,202
~E)ementary Average
487
Notes:
JUNIOR HIGH BUILDING
PROGRAM CAPACITY
821
854
741
828
768
709
1998
,721
)Junior High Average
I 787 I
SENIOR mGB BUll..DING
PROGRAM CAPACITY
Decatur 1,121
Federal Way 1,308
Thomas Jefferson 1,266
I
1998 TOTAL 3,695
JSeniorffigh Average
I 1,232 I
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUll-DING
PROGRAM CAPACITY
194
1998 TOTAL
"'210
Elementary program capacities are based on the number of teaching stations
in the building. contracted class size. and special use classrooms in place
during the 96/97 school year. All available instructional space is calculated.
SecondaIy program capacities are based on peak loading.
The calculation is based on 25 students per available
teaching stations.
Capacities were calculated by the Study and Survey Committee.
111-3
EXHIBn j)
PAGE1!-OF ?J5'
1
:,:,1
J
1
.J
J
]
~J
']
~
]
J
r},
~.':
¡"
I-..
~:::
'~:..
,
rJ
",' 'J
~,
1><
]
B"
",:'
!'"
T,:}
;Ok
J
J
Ports
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICf#110 -1997/98 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
PORTABLE LOCA nONS
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
-
JNS'IR1ICIICIIC . _UCIIOHAL
Adelaide 1
Brh~adoon 1
Camelot 1
Enterprise. 1
Green Gables
Lake Dollo1l 1
Lake Grove 2
Lakeland. 1
Mark Twain. 3
Meredith Hill
Mirror Lake 1 1
Nautilus -, '"
Olympic View 2
Panther Lake 3
Rainier View 2
Sherwood Forest 3
Silver Lake ..
Star Lake 4
Sunnycrest
Twin Lakes 2 1
Va1hal1a
Wildwood 4
ont 1 1
TOTAL 36 4
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT JUNIOR IDGHS
-
INS'IRUCIIOHAL INS1'RUCIIOI'IA
lllahee 3
Kilo 3 1
Lakot,a 2
Sacajawea 2
SaJilialie. 4
Totem S
TOTAL 17 3
. Additional portables are ordered, but not yet in place:
Enterprise 1 Portable
Lakeland 1 Portable
Mark Twain 1 Portable
Saghaliê 2 Portables
ITI-5
...
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT SENIOR HIGHS
-
1NS'IR\ICJIOftAI. 1NS1R\ICJIOftAI.
Decatur ..
Federal Way 1
Thomas Jefferson
TnunanlMerit 7 1
12 1
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT SUPPORT FACILnDES
Science & Testin2 K 1
5-Mile Lake 1
MOT 1
Clothin2 Bank 1
¡TI\T A., 4
HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES
(NOT DISTRICI' OWNED)
1
Total
2.
EXHIB~T -D
PAGE~OF M
Student Forecast
J
. J
]
:1
J
!(~
]
J
Û
J
1
J
The District has several methòds available to forecast the number of students it anticipates in
future years. The District is using a program called Enrollment Master for base line grade level
forecast and a statistical trend method for comparison. Enrollment Master is a statistical
model that uses feeder school information, cohort survival, and historical student data to
forecast future student enrollment. The District also continues to use the MicroSam software.
The District uses these software packages to forecast for a maximum of six years. The District
also prepares long range forecasting using different models.
These projections reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections
published by the Office of Financial Management of the State of Washington.
"}
..J
, I
J
]
III-6
EXH I BIT --Þ
PAGEßLOF 36
. ¡
1
~
I
]
]
I
~
J
1
J
J
t
]
J
.J
J
]
......",.""","N"""
Tstfcsl
Ynm
...32 AM
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #210 -1997/98 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT FORECAST
I ~~~ I 1998 I 1999 I 2000 I 2001 I 2002 I 2003 I
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
K 1,726 1,733 1,756 1,778 1,800 1,82~ 1,84~
1 1,6,?1 1,784 1,791 1,815 1,838 1,861 1,884
.-.." ...
2 1,815 1,692 1,785 1,792 1,816 1,839 1,862
-
3 1..796 1,836 1,713 1,807 1,81~ 1,838 1,862
4 1,704 1,806 1,847 1,723 - 1,818 1,825 1,849
5 1,630 1,713 1,817 1,858 1,733 1,829 1,836
6 1,600 1,631 1,714 1,818 1,859 1,743 1,830
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
7 1,694 1,641 1,672 1,758 1,864 1,906 1,778
8 1,692 1,690 1,636 1,667 1,752 _.-1~58 .-. 1,9O<!
-----
9 1,758 1,709 1,706 1,652 1,683 1,769 1,876
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
10 1,567 1,732 1,683 1,680 1,627 1,657 1,742
11 1,454 1,502 1,660 1,614 1,611 1.560 1,589
12 1,351 1,373 1,419 1,568 1,525 1,522 1,474
.."
ENROLLMENT - HEADCOUNT SUMMARY
Eleni (He) -11,962 12,195 12,423 12,591 12,67~ 12,758 .12,968
]f Hi,gh 5,144 5,040 5,014 5,077 5,2~~ 5,533 5,554
Sr High 4,372 4,607 4,762 4,862 4,763 4,739 4,805
TOTAL (He) 21,478 21,842 22,199 22,530 22,740 23,030 23,327
ENROLLMENT - FULL TIME EOUIV ALENT (FTE) SUMMARY
~Iem ~ l~) .,... -__.~.1E99 11,329 --!!,545 11,702 11,778 11,847 12,046
]r Hi h ...._.._~!~ 5,040 5~0~i 5,077 _...__5,2~? ._.~¿33 5,554
--_.$._----_... -.,- --
SrHigh 4,372 4,607 4,762 4,862 4,763 4,739 4,805
TOTAL (FIE) 20,615 20,976 21,321 21,641 21,840 22,119 22,405
Rate of Growth 2.88% 1.72% 1.62% 1.48% 0.91% 1.26% 1.28%
llI-7
EXH I B ftT ..D
PAGE ~ OF ~
'.
Capacity Summañes
-J
All Grades, Elementary, Junior High, and Senior High Schools
1
]
--;]
. )
~~1
The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast
information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and
why there is a need for the district to use temporary facilities or interim measures.
The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire
Distri~ and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, junior high, and
senior high levels individually.
The noteS at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in
place each year. -
.....
"J
g
J
J
]
]
J
J
J
III-8
EXH~BIT -Þ
PÁ\(G lE~ OF .35
\
J
. " J
I
.]
]
J
']
1
]
:1
3
]
J
]
J
.J
J
J
FEDERAL WAY SCBOOLDISTRIcr#210 ~ 1997/98
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES
...
Actual - ~ Projected - ~
,
CAP A CITY 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
BUll-DING PROGRAM
CAPACITY 19,828 19,828 19,802 19,776 19,750 19,824 20,308
Add or subtract changes to capacity
" ..
"
", .. " ..
.. :', (26) " ~~~), :' ::'(26),",: " ..,
3. Special Education Changes (26)' Q6) ..
.. .... ..
4. New ElementaJy : .. .. .. .. ~,~,~,::~~:::', ., "
: : .., " .. "
5. Truman High modernization and expansion : '" 10q ,:, ..
.. ', " , , ,.. , .
: " ..
Adjusted Program Capacity 19,828 19,802 19,776 19,750 19,824 20.308 20,308
ENROLLMENT
I Basic FI'E Enrollment
1 20,615 20,976 121,321 I 21,641 121,840 I 22,119 122,405 f
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM CAPACITY
RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1.
Current Portable Capacity 1,625 1,625 2,000 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,625
. , "" . """ .., ..
2. Federal Way Academy ::':'~,1.~~:'::::, .. ....'.., , """ ..
.... . .. '..,........
.. , .... """"
" """""""""
" .. ..., ,... .,..
Add new portable capacity .. 375:::, 250'::': ... .......... ,:'::::::.:225:;::,::::',: ..,
,. ..'
Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,625 2,000 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,625 2,625
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
CAP A CITY 838 826 8SS 509 384 8~. S28
NOTES:
1. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and
other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily
house students until pennanent facilities are available. This is a
calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used .
will be based upon actual population needs.
2. Federal Way Academy junior high program will increase capacity at one Junior High Site.
3. Add Programs - 3 ECEAP, 1 SBD (Severely Behavioral Disordered) and I Pre-School Program
This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated.
4. New Elementary
EXHIBIT j)
PAGE~OF
,
?;ó
~ruman Hig~ School modernization and expansion
Y22I\III
9:02 AM
111-9
- }
¡
1
]
]
-j
~
'.,
-
J
t]
]
J
]
]
¡
- J
J
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #110 - 1997/98
CAPITAL FACILlTIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Actual - - Projected - -
CAP A CITY 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
BUllDING PROGRAM
CAPACITY 11,202 11,202 11,202 11,176 11,150 11,124 11,608
2. Special Education Changes ' , "" ':'(26) (26) (26) (26) (26)
3. New Elementary School 510'
Adjusted Program Capacity 11,202 11,202 11.176 11,150 11,124 11.608 11,582
ENROLLMENT
1 Basic FfE EnroUment
111,099 111,329 111,545 111.702 11.1,778 111,847 112,0461
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM CAPACITY
RELOCATABLE CAPACITY l.
Current Portable Capacity
900
900
925
925
925
925
850
Add/Subtract portable capacity
Move to Senior High
4. Add per inventory
Move to Junior Hi~h
Adjusted Portable Capacity
"""""""""""""""""""-""""""""'" """"""""""""""""""" """""""""" ................,
..
.. ,
", .. (50i\ :.. ,
..':, ':'..: ::: :,'. '?,~;,~::::;:::" " "..:'
(75)"- , ,
850 850
900
925
925
925
925
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCA TABLE
CAP A CITY 1,003 799 556 373 271 6.11 386
NOTES:
1. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and
other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily
house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a
calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used
will be based upon actual population needs.
2. Add Programs 3 ECEAP, 1 SBD(Severely Behavioral Disordered) and 1 Pre-School Program
This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated.
3. New Elementary School
4. Portables ordered but not yet placed at Enterprise, Lakeland and Mark Twain
Capsum98
SI22I98
9:02 AM
EXH~B~T- D
~)JJ!\\\\ {(~ ",':'"!'\~ 'r",..r.= 35.
rn~LC::~Ur
111-10
: I
. ~ j
J
']
]
J
'1
~
~
.]
;..If
ä:}
r,.::
.,.:
]
OJ
]
]
J
J
J
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1#210 -1997/98
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
-.
Actual - - Projected - -
CAP A CITY 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
BUllDING PROGRAM -
CAPACITY 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721
""..............' ..""". ...'" ...."" .................". .................. ..................... .................
..
.. .. '" .,
.,
.. " .. '.
Adjusted Program Capacity 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721
ENROLLMENT
I Basic FfE Enrollment
I 5,144 I 5,040 I 5,014 I 5,077 I 5,299 , 5,533 I 5,554 I
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM CAPACITY
RELOCA TABLE CAPACITY 1.
Cw:rent Portable Capacity
575
575
575
875
425
425
425
2. Federal Way Academy
Add/Subtract portable capacity
Add From ElementaIy
Adjusted Portable Capacity
.......,..".......,................... ................. ...................................." ........,........... ..............."
,:'", "..,' ",150 "', '::::/:::'::/::::::,::':,:::::::':
..",',.."..,'::' :".. ',,"":,..',:,;~:I~};¡&~::t~:~~;~,':':":"",::':':"":
425 425 575 575 575 875 875
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
CAP A CITY 2 106 282 219 (3) 63' 42
NOTES:
1. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and
other administrative techniques wlùch can be used to temporarily
house students until permanent facilities are available. TIrls is a
ca1culated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used
will be based upon actual population needs.
2. Federal Way Academy junior lùgh program will increase capacity at one junior lùgh site.
Capsum98
Yl2m
f:O2 AM
EXH ~ B ~T -j)
It>,~.\ <~ I'~ "\, - 'I' ,,-,- ~
W~ n\ ~ ~ t:?\~ ',~ L-" 7.J
III-ll
.
f
.. I
]
.J
-.1
~
,.
....1
~)
..J
J
1
]
J
J
J
]
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #210 - 1997/98
CAPITAL FACn..ITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Actual - - Projected - -
CAPACITY 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
BunDING PROGRAM
CAPACITY. 3,905 3,905 3,905 3,905 3,905 3,905 4,005
Add or subtract changes in ..................... ................... .................. ..........."....... ......... ........ ............"oO..... ...............oO
capacity due to construction .................... .................. .................. ........oO.......... ................. ...................oO """""'oOoO...
..................... oO"""""""'" .................. .................... ................. .............,....... .................
.................... ""'oO"oO""'" .................. """"""""oO" oO"""""""" oO""""""""'" ....."...........
or remodel ..
2. Truman High modernization and expansion 100
Adjusted Program Capacity 3,905 3,905 3,905 3,905 3,905 4,005 4,005
ENROLLMENT
~ Basic FrE Enrollment
I 4,372 I 4,607 I 4,862 I 4,763 I 4,862 I 4,739 I 4,805 I
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM CAPACITY
RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1.
Current Portable Capacity 300 300 725 975 975 975 975
.. '. .. ....
Add new portable capacity 375: '.250 .... "
Move ftom ElementaIy ~~::::::/: .. .... :
.. ....... ..... ...
... " "
.. " ..
.. : :
: .. . .
Adjusted Portable Capacity 300 725 975 975 975 975 975
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCA TABLE . .
CAP A CITY (167) 23 18 117 18 241 175
NOTES:
1. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and
other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily
house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a
calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used
will be based upon actual population needs.
2. Truman High School modernization and expansion
C8psum98
Y22J98
9:02 AM
EXH ~ B ~1 -.J)
PAGE a1. (H~ 3!)
111-12
.......-----."...... ....,.v.~",..
King County. the City of Federal Way. and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calèùlations
Single and Multi-Family Residences
.. ,
f
. 1
J
,J
:1
~
J
"."
i,..
I
]
J
]
]
J
J
J
Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to
help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities.
To detennine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was
established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was also adopted by
the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student
Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by
each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which
are unique to that district.
. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS
The Federal Way School District student generation factor was determined separately for
single family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 1997/98 Capital Facilities
Plan were derived using actual generation factors ftom single family units and multi-family
uni~s, which were constructed in the last five (5) years.
- IMP ACT FEE CALCULATION
Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee
Calculation for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and tQe
GrowthManagement Act.
Single Family Units
1$2882.1
1$874.1
- ,'j
;', >.
Multi-Family Units
Student Generation Factors - For page numbering
III-13
EXH~Bn -Þ
PAGE~(OF 35
&r-..
L-.J
~
L....J
L...J
-
I..-.J
6...J
o...........iI
~
~
-
I I
-...,.¡ .
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #210 -1997198 CAPITAL FACILmES PLAN
STUDENT GENERATION
NEW CONSTRUCTION IN PRIOR S YEARS
Single Family Student Generation
Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Junior High Senior High Total
Single Family Multi-Family Elementary Junior High Senior High Student Student Student Student
DEVELOPMENT Dwellings Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor
(97) Southern Rose 22 0 10 2 0 0.45454545 0.09090909 0.00000000 0.54545455
97) Grouse Pointc 30 0 14 4 4 0.46666667 0.13333333 0.13333333 0.73333333
(96) Bellacarino Woods 80 0 34 10 7 0.42500000 0.12500000 0.08750000 0.63750000
(96 The Highlands 69 0 16 7 3 0.23188406 0.10144928 0.04347826 0.37681159
(95 Camelot III 21 0 10 0 1 0.47619048 0.00000000 0.04761.905 0.52380952
(95 Campus Glen 95 0 23 10 12 0.24210526 0.10526316 0.12631579 0.47368421
94) Parkwood Campus 48 0 21 10 3 0.43750000 0.20833333 0.06250000 0.70833333
94) Alder Glen 44 0 20 6 4 0.45454545 0.13636364 0.09090909 0.68181818
(93) Campus Highlands Division 3 86 0 51 15 15 0.59302326 0.17441860 0.17441860 0.94186047
(93) Regency Woods 323 0 116 32 38 0.35913313 0.09907121 0.11784706 0.57585139
Total 818 0 315 96 87
Student Generation ::!HinO;3851 H!:::: :¡jHH'o;1114'):: ¡ H/ ¡: ¡ 0.1084 ¡,¡.::n= ¡ ¡ ': ¡0;6088.:'::
-
-
-
I
-
. ::o
~~
~'~
n-. -T r==-
IQ.J ~
P'-~
( ,
r
~I-
Multi-Family Student Generation
County Wide Average
Elementary Junior High Senior High Total
Student Student Student Student
School District Factor Factor Factor Factor
IssaQuah School District 0.105 0.039 0.049 0.193
Kent School District.. 0.235 0.080 0.062 0.377
Lake Washington School District 0.051 0.020 0.014 0.085
North Shore School District 0.040 0.010 0.020 0.070
Average .:::¡:::¡¡.();:1:()7.8::H¡;¡:¡:::HH!¡¡:();037~..¡;::::::.:.:::0;0363.::::::':::::;:::0..1813:::::;: I
YŒ1DB"
SIWtI
I:1S AN
.' ""'-""""
",
¡
J
,
I
1
..J
]
]
~
J
,]
d,:.::.
it
]
]
]
J
.J
J
..1
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT ##210 -1997/98
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE
School Site Acquisition Cost:
Facility Cost I
Facility
Student
Factor
Student
Factor
Cost!
Elementary
Jr High
Sr High
Cost!
Acreage Acre. Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR
14.00 $25,000 510 0.3851 0.1078 $264 $74
0.00 $0 787 0.1174 0.0373 $0 $0
0.00 $0 1,232 0.1064 0.0363 $0 $0
TOTAL 5264 574
Facility
Student
Factor
Student
Factor
Costl
School Construction Cost:
% Perm FacJ
Elementary
Jr High
*SrHigh
. * SeÌùor High
Costl
Facility
Total SQ Ft Cost CaDacitv SFR MFR SFR MFR
97.34% $10,500,000 510 0.3851 0.1078 $7,718 $2,160
97.34% $0 787 0.1174 0.0373 $0 '$0
97.34% $1,833,152 100 0.1064 0.0363 $1,899 $648
is Truman Alternative School Grades 9-12 TOTAL 59,616 2,808
. Facility
Studènt
Factor
Cost!
Student
Factor
. Temporary Facility Cost:
% Temp Fac.
Elementary
Jr High
Sr High
Costl
Facility
Total SQ Ft Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR
2.66% $62,368 2S 0.3851 0.1078 $26 $7
2.66% $62,368 25 0.1174 0.0373 $8 $~
- -
2.66% $62,368 25 0.1064 0.0363 $7 $2
TOTAL $40 512
State Matching Credit Calcul~tion:
Boeck Cost! Sq. Ft
Elementary
]r High
Sr High
State
Student
Factor
Costl
Student
Factor
Costl
SoFt Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR
$97.23 80 59.89% 0.3851 0.1078 $1,794 $502
$97.23 0 59.890/0 0.1174 0.0373 $0 $0
$97.23 120 59.89% 0.1064 0.0363 $743 $254
Total $2,537 5756
Tax Payment Credit Calculation
Average Assessed Value (April 98)
Capital Bond Interest Rate (April 98)
Net Present Value of Average Dwelling
Years Amortized
Property Tax Levy Rate
Present Value of Revenue Stream
IMPCTFE 1998
Ynm
9:04 AM
SFR
MFR
_$f~3,979 -- $34,641
" 5.19% 5.190/0
------- -'
,$1,101,581 -.. $265,038
10 10
.----
$1.47 $1.47
51,619 $390
Single Family Multi-Family
Residences Residences
Mitigation Fee Summary
Site Acquisition Cost
Pennanent Facility Cost
Temporary Facility Cost
State Match Credit
Tax Payment Credit
Sub-Total
50% Local Share
~Impact Fee
$264
59,616
540
($2,537)
($1,619)
55,764
574
52,808
512
($756)
(5390)
51,749
$2,882 $,87. 4 ~
52,882 ~ JI
. "!~.' t~)lIT,-
[::.~ {;\tí~., I"~ SI.I"\. ' ~,- ';,' - ~ "::1.~
rRui:,;,..~_}~1i 7;;
ill-IS
¡
!
"j
-1
]
" J:
1
~
SECTION IV
SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1997/98 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The 1997/98 Capital FacilitieS Plan is an updated document, based on the 1996/97 Capital
Facilities Plan. The changes between the 1996/97 and 1997/98 Plan are listed.
SECTION I - THE CAPITAL F ACILITffiS PLAN
CURRENT INVENTORY OF NON-INSTRUCfIONAL FACILITES
Develooed Prooertv
Security/Science Kit Center sale is pending
Undevelooed Prooertv
Site 98 is sold
NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES
Facility equity updates have been removed from the needs forecast- existing facilities.
NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES
A new elementary school is added to the needs forecast - new facilities.
.;....
The Six Year Finance has been rolled forward to reflect 1998/2003
,]
]
J
)
]
]
:J"
,i'
TI
JJ
J
IV-l
Ex~.n ~ r1r ...Þ
PAL~M~~~' ~
I
.[
¡
]
J
:i
J
J
J
J
]
]
]
J
J
°jl
JI
-- ..-.--......
.'
SECTION ill - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
CAPACITY
Changes to capacity between the 1996/97 Capital Facilities Plan and the 1997/98 Capital
Facilities Plan can be found on page IV-3.
PORTABLES
The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables
purchased. Changes to portables between the 1996/97 Capital Facilities Plan and the 1997/98
Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page IV-4. 0
STUDENT FORECAST
The Student Forecast now covers 1998 through 2003. The new forecast reflects an increased
rate of growth at a decreasing ratc? observed in the District.
CAPACITY SUMMARY
The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and
student forecast. The Board is considering the Federal Way Academy, a program for junior
high students that would be sited at an existing junior high site in portables. This program is
shown as an increase in capacity in the 1999/2000 school year.
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY °CODE 21A
The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment
made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 1996/97
Capital Facilities Plan and the 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page IV-5.
IV-2
EXH I fUr -Ò
PAGE~OF 36.
....O.O~---"OO_-,--O.O-OO-O_-"OU_.O.'-O'-.O 0 0
CAPACITY CHANGES FROM 1996/97 TO 1997/98
I
I
J
J
. J
~
The Study and Survey CoIIUI1Íttee did a full inventory of all educational facilities and met with
building administrators to. discuss program needs. Committee members developed a target
capacity for each building. This capacity was calculated using baseline instructional space
requirements to meet current and proposed educational plans.
The capacities shown represent actual program capacities as they exist at the time of
publishing.
J
J
g
J
]
J
J
J
J
.J
IV-3
EXtU ~ rr j)
PAG Ë 3?J OF ~
'~'~'----_"..h""""""~'_u,,, """"""U_-,.,..,..."
¡ -
l
PORTABLE CHANGES FROM 1996/97 to 1997/98
The numbers of portables in the 1996/97 Capital Facilities Plan indicated number of portable
structures at each site. The Í997/98 Capital Facilities Plan indicates the number of portable
classrooms available at each site.
I
J~
I
!~J
J
J
J
J
J
]
J
J
J
J
ELEMENTARY
Adelaide - One new portable
Wildwood - Two from SheJWood Forest Elementary
SECONDARY
Totem - One from Camelot Elementary
IV-4
EX~.U ~ n1 ..D
PAGE~OF Y5
',..", "'~"'~""~,-------_..,.......,....
I
I
I
~
--'
J
]
J
}
}
1
J
1
\J
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 1996/97 TO 1997/98
STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a
period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in
student Generation factors between the 1996/97 Capital Facilities Plan and the 997/98 Capital
Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the
developments.
IMP ACT FEE
Item
Elementary Site Cost
Fromffo
$4,500. To
$25,000.
97.45 %to
97.34%
2.55% to
2.66%
$92,361 to
$62,368
Percent of Permanent Facilities
Percent Temporary Facilities
Temporary Facility Cost
Boeck Cost/Sq Ft
$94.27 to
$97.23
State Match
58.92% to
59.89%
SFR-
$136,500 to
$143,979. .
Average Assessed Value
MFR - $41,846
to $34,641.
Capital Bond Interest Rate
5.81% to
5.19%
Property Tax Levy Rate
$1.55to $1.47
IV-5
"'.".
Comment.
Current negòtiated prices
Purchase of additional portable facilities
Updated cost of most recently
purchased portable (Adelaide
Elementary)
Change per SPI
Change per SPI
Per Puget Sound Educational Service
District (ESD 121) .- .
Market Rate
Per King County
Ex~n~~T .J)
PAGE~OF ~
-"~""-""'~'" """,.......,..u",."""", ".,.--
DATE:
July 1, 1998
TO:
Phil Watkins, Chair
Land Useffransportation Committee
~eff Pratt, Surface Wate~ Manage~
SeaTac Phase I (BeImor) RFB98-107 "Rebid" - Authority to Award Bid
FROM:
SUBJECT:
. -
Background:
This item was presented to you and was approved for Award to Stan Palmer Construction, Inc.
on June 1, 1998. Due to the reluctance of Stan palmer Construction, Inc. To enter into a contract
with the City for the construction of the above referenced project and in an effort to potentially
save project costs, the City rejected all bids and rebid the project.
On June 29, 1998, the City received one bid on the referenced project rebid. The low-bid
contractor for this project is Pivetta Brothers Construction, Inc., with a total bid amount of
$1,429,377.61. As an aside, Pivetta was the second low bid on the initial project bid. This bid
amount is 10% lower than the average bid of the three lowest bidders combined of the first
bidding process, and 6.5% higher than the engineer's estimated construction cost for this project
(see attached rebid tabulation). .
Based on the reference checks completed by CH2M HILL, Inc., the City's Design Consultant on
this project, and by City staff, there is no known reason why this low bidder should not be able
to successfully complete this project to the City's satisfaction.
The project budget status is as follows:
Design
$ 195,900.00
Acquisition
$ 47,000.00
Construction Management
$ 214,700.00
Construction
$1,572,315.37
: 10% Construction Contingency
$ 142,937.76
Total Project Costs
$210291915.37
Council Authorized Budget
$118531356.00
Costs - Budget
$ 1761559.37
The estimated project shortfall ($176,559.37) is due to a two year construction delay and includes
the 10% construction contingency in the amount of $142,937.76.
Recommendations:
Staff recommends that the project b':1dget be amended by a budget increase in the amount of
$176,559.37. Staff recommends the award of this project to the Jowest responsive, responsible
bidder, Pivetta.Brothers Construction, Inc., in the amount of $1,429,377.61 and that a 10%
construction contingency' totaling $142, 937.76 be established for the project. In addition, staff
recommends that this matter. be placed on the July 7, 1998 City Council meeting consent agenda
for their consideration.
JC:\LUl'C\1998\BELREBID. WPD
.
CITY OF ...
. -., e:o E.R:FR-
~ ~ FlY""
DATE:.
July I, 1998
Phil Watkins, Chair
Land U seffransportation Committee
FROM: Jeff Pratt, Surface Water Manage~
SUBJECT:. - SeaTac Phase I (BeJmor) RFB98-107 "Rebid" - Authority to Award Bid
TO:
Background:
This item was presented to you and was approved for Award to Stan Palmer Construction, Inc.
on June 1, 1998. Due to the reluctance of Stan palmer. Construction, Inc. To enter into a contract
with the City for the construction of the above referenced project and in an effort to potentially
save project costs, the City rejected all bids and rebid the project.
On June 29, 1998, the City received one bid. on the referenced project rebid. The low-bid
contractor for this project is Pivetta Brothers Construction, Inc., with a total bid amount of
$1,429,377.61. As an aside, Pivetta was the second low bid on the initial project bid. This bid
amount is 10 % lower than the average bid of the three lowest bidders combined of the first
bidding process, and 6.5% higher than the engineer's estimated construction cost for this project
(see attached rebid tabulation). .
Based on the reference checks completed by CH2M HILL, Inc., the City's Design Consultant on
this project, and by City staff, there is no known reason why this low bidder should not be able
to successfully complete this project to the City's satisfaction.
The project budget status is as follows:
Design
$ 195,900.00
Acquisition
$ 47,000.00
Construction Management
$ 214,700.00
Construction
$1,572,315.37
10 % Construction Contingency
$ 142,937.76
.....~--.,......-..
Total Project Costs
$2,029,915.37
Council Authorized Budget
$1,853,356.00
Costs - Budget
$ 176,559.37
The estimated project shortfall ($176,559.37) is due to a two year construction delay and includes
the 10% construction contingency in the amount of $142,937.76.
Recommendations:
Staff recommends that the project budget be amended by a budget increase in the amount of
$176,559.37. Staff recommends the award of this project to the lowest responsive, responsible
bidder, Pivetta.ßrothers Construction, Inc., in the amount of $1,429,377.61 and that a 10%
construction çontingency totaling $142, 937.76 be established for the project. In addition, staff
recommendS that tills matter be placed on the July 7, 1998 City Council meeting consent agenda
for their consideration.
Ie: \L UTC\ 1998 \B ELREB ID . WPD
.
.
.------..---------.-....---
. "~~~;,:.----"---'
..,.
or,
.'
'.
'.