The URL can be used to link to this page

LUTC PKT 05-05-1997 U-vJu I --, City of Federal Way City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee May 5, 1997 :; '. 30 pm . . City Halt Council Chambers or-- AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3. PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minute limit) 4. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Granville Preliminary Plat Action Michaelson/tO min Action MoorelHarris/15 min Action Pratt! to min Action Miller/tO min Action Miller/tO min Action Miller/tO min B. Cellular Towers C. South 356th Regional Surfacewater Facility D. 21st Avenue SW @ SW 325th Signal Project E. SW Dash Point Road & 21st Avenue SW Traffic Signal F. SW 336th from 21st Avenuè SW Improvements 5. OTHER ITEMS 6. FUTURE MEETINGS/AGENDAS 7. ADJOURN - City Staff: Kathy McClung, Deputy CDS Director Sandy Lyle, Administrative Assistant 661-4116 Committee Members: Phil Watkins, Chair Ron Gintz Mary Gates I:\LU- TRANS\MA Y5LUT .AGN TO: FR: RE: DT: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee Lori Michaelson, Senior Planner Preliminary Plat of Granville Place Application #SUB96-0001, UPR96-0017 I. May 5, 1997 II. III. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION The applicant requests approval of a seven (7) lot single family residential subdivision as provided for under Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, Subdivisions, subject to Process III approval under the 1990 Subdivision Code. REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION Pursuant to FWCC Process III approval, the City Council issues a final decision after review of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation. Consistent with how land use matters are currently processed by the City, preliminary plat applications are brought to City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee for review and recommendation' prior to review by the full Coundl. HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION The Federal Way Hearing Examiner on April 21, 1997, issued a recommendation (attached) to approve the proposed preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to final plat approval the existing structure on Lot 7, located within five feet of the proposed south property line, must be removed or relocated to conform to building setback requirements as established by Federal Way City Code (FWCC); or lot lines must be adjusted accordingly. 2. Prior to final plat approval the required off-site hydrant must be installed at SW 344th Street at a location approved by King County Fire District #39, or alternative fire protection measures implemented for Lot #7, as approved by the fire district. 3. Pursuant to the applicant's proposal to pay a fee in lieu of reserving a portion of on site open space, as provided by the FWCC, a current market value analysis of similarly situated property must be submitted to the City to determine the amount of the open space fee under this agreement. Payment of the open space fee shall be required prior to final plat approval. Land Use and Transportation Committee May 5, 1997 Page 2 of 4 4. The existing temporary cul-de-sac easement located east of the site at the existing terminus of SW 346th Place shall be relinquished and documents filed with the City for recording. The applicant is responsible to prepare and submit the necessary documents in a form approved by the City. The applicant shall reconstruct the cul-de-sac area to match the existing improvements. Design and construction of this street section shall conform to Public Works standards and shall include sidewalks and street trees within the planter strip, as approved by the City. 5. Design and location of the temporary barricade adjacent to Lot 7 shall be approved by the City of Federal Way and King County Fire District #39. This temporary barricade shall be removed with future right-of-way improvements, as required and approved by the City. 6. The proposed temporary cul-de-sac easement located in Lots 5 and 6 shall be relinquished with future right-of-way improvements at this location, and the area reconstructed, as required and approved by the City. 7. Retention/detention facilities used to control runoff from the site to off-site drainage courses shall be located in a detention tract dedicated to the City at the time of final plat approval, unless located within improved public rights-of-way. 8. The final plat drawing must establish the open space buffer in an open space tract to be owned in common and maintained by property owners of the proposed subdivision, and prohibiting removal or disturbance of landscaping within the tract, except as necessary for maintenance or replacement of existing plantings and as approved by the City. The open space buffer shall be landscaped to achieve and maintain a visual buffer pursuant to FWCC Chapter 20-155 and Sec. 22-1565(c)(1), as approved by the City, and pursuant to Condition #9 , below. 90 Prior to issuance of construction permits a landscape plan, prepared by a licensed landscape architect, shall be submitted to the City for approval, and shall include the following elements: (a) Open space buffer landscaping; (b) Street trees in planter strips inside plat boundaries and off-site as required by Condition #4, above; (c) Significant tree replacement plan; and (d) Visual screening of all property boundaries of the detention tract from adjacent properties and the right-of-way with landscaping and/or fencing. Land Use and Transportation Committee May 5, 1997 Page 3 of 4 Prior to final plat approval all required improvements must be completed or the improvements appropriately bonded, per City code requirements. Design and construction of plat improvements shall conform to City code, the King County Surface Water Design Manual, the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan, and all other applicable codes and regulations. 10. IV. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY October 26, 1996 March 1, 1997 March 15, 1997 April 1, 1997 April 21, 1997 May 5, 1997 May 20, 1997 Notice of Application issued. Environmental determination issued. Notice of Public Hearing issued. Hearing Examiner public hearing. Hearing Examiner recommendation issued * . Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-487, the Hearing Examiner shall issue a written recommendation to the City Council (attached) . City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee meeting. The Land Use Committee is to forward a recommendation to the full Council for decision (see Section VI, below). City Council meeting. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-490, the City Council shall consider the application at a scheduled meeting within ninety calendar days of the issuance of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation. * No challenge to the Hearing Examiner recommendation was filed with the City. V. DECISIONAL CRITERIA City Council's review of the application is limited to the record of the hearing before the Hearing Examiner, the Examiner's written report, compliance with review criteria set forth in FWCC Sec. 22-476 et seq., and other applicable ordinances and regulations of the FWCC. Sec. 22-476 requires that the application be approved if it is consistent with the following three decisional criteria. Findings on how the application is consistent with these decisional criteria are established at page 5, item 20 of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation. 1. The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; Land Use and Transportation Committee May 5, 1997 Page 4 of 4 2. All applicable provisions of the Federal Way City Code, including those adopted by reference from the Comprehensive Plan; and 3. The public health, safety, and welfare. VI. COUNCIL ACTION A draft resolution recommending approval of the proposed application as recommended by the Hearing Examiner will be included in the May 20, 1997 City Council agenda packet. After consideration of the record, the City Council may, by action approved by a majority of the total membership, take one of the following actions, pursuant to FWCC Sec. 22-490: 1. Approve the application, or 2. Approve the application with minor modifications, or 3. Deny the application; or 4. Remand the matter back to the Hearing Examiner for further consideration. The City Council shall not substantially modify the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner without first referring the matter back to the Hearing Examiner or conducting its own hearing of the application. Attachments: Hearing Examiner Recommendation Staff Report to Hearing Examiner I. /I. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. XII. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT TO THE FEDERAL WAY HEARING EXAMINER PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GRANVILLE PLACE File Nos. SUB96-0001, UPR96-0017 PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 1, 1997 - 2:00 P.M. FEDERAL WAY CITY HALL - CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH TABLE OF CONTENTS Generallnformation..............................................2 Consulted Departments and Agencies ...............................3 State Environmental Policy Act .....................................3 Natural Environment ........................,.................... 4 Neighborhood Characteristics ......................................4 General Design .................................................5 Transportation .............................................,.... 5 Public Services .................................................6 Utilities........................................................8 AnalysisofDecisionaICriteria......................................9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions ..................................10 Recommendation...............................................11 List of Exhibits ..................................................,... 13 Report prepared by: Lori Michaelson, Senior Planner March 25, 1997 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT FOR PUBLIC HEARING OF APRIL 1,1997 FILE NOS. SUB96-0001, UPR96-0017 APPLICANT(S): Bob Woodford and Jerry Holm 25105 9th Avenue S Des Moines, WA 98198 (206) 790-7543 OWNER: Gene F. Sims 17429 31st Drive NW Arlington, WA 98223 James McCulloch 3327 SW 344th Street Federal Way, WA 98023 ACTION REQUESTED: Preliminary plat approval of a seven (7) lot single family residential subdivision as provided for under Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, Subdivisions; and requiring approval pursuant to FWCC Article VIII, Process III approval. STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Lori Michaelson, Senior Planner, (206) 661-4045 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Preliminary Plat approval with conditions as recommended. I. GENERAL INFORMATION a. Description of the Proposal: The applicant proposes to subdivide two parcels of land into seven lots, each having a minimum of 7,200 square feet. One of the subject parcels contains an existing single family residence and the other parcel is undeveloped. b. Location: The site is located between 30th Avenue SW and 35th Avenue SW, approximately 220 feet south of SW 344th Street, with access from SW 346th Place, if extended. (See Exhibit B). c. Leqal Description: See Exhibit C. 2 I. II. III. GENERAL INFORMATION (cont'd) d. Size of Property: The site has a land area of 91 ,040 square feet (2.09 acres). The developed parcel (Lot 7) contains 10,320 square feet (SF), and the undeveloped parcel (Proposed Lots 1-6 and detention tract) contains 80,720 SF. e. Land Use and Zoning (See Exhibit D) Direction Zoninq Comprehensive Plan Existing Land Use Site RS-7.2* SFR - High Density** Vacant & SFR** North Same Same SFR South-East-West Same Same Same *RS-7.2=single family residential, - 7,200 SF minimum lot size **SFR =single family residential CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES The following departments, agencies and individuals were advised of this application: a. Community Development Review Committee (CDRC) consisting of the Federal Way Planning Division, Building Division, Public Works, Parks and Police Departments; King County Fire District 39; Lakehaven Utility District; and Federal Way Public Schools. CDRC comments have been incorporated into this report where applicable. b. All property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the site were mailed notice of this application and of the April 1, 1997 public hearing. The site was also posted and notice published in the newspaper and on the City's official notice boards. Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, Subdivisions, notice was also sent to the City of Tacoma and Pierce County, because these jurisdictional boundaries are located within 500 feet of the site. No comments regarding the public hearing have been received as of the date of this report. c. In accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and FWCC Chapter 18, Environmental Protection, all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the site, and all affected agencies were notified of the proposed action and the City's environmental decision. In addition, the site was posted and notice placed in the newspaper and on the City's official notice boards. No public comments regarding the proposed action and the City's environmental decision were received. No changes or corrections were made to the City's initial determination. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) An Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued for the proposed action on March 1, 1997 (See Exhibit E). No comment or appeal was received prior to the established deadline of March 30, 1997. No changes or corrections were made to the City's initial determination. 3 IV. V. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT a. Storm Water Runoff: The applicant will be required to provide storm drainage improvements to comply with all applicable Core and Special Requirements outlined in the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), including surface water detention, biofiltration, and oil/water separation. A Level 1 Downstream Analysis, prepared by Pac-Tech Engineering, dated March, 1996 (Exhibit F) was submitted to the Department of Community Development Services and reviewed by the Public Works Department. The preliminary plat is designed to collect storm water in a detention pond, with release to a water quality biofiltration swale and conveyance to the north of the site, via a closed conveyance system, to an existing outfall point in SW 344th Street. See Section IX.c. of this report for a detailed description of proposed drainage facilities. b. Soils: The 1973 USDA Soil Conservation Service (SCS) soil survey for King County classifies site soils as Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam. The Alderwood Series is characterized as moderately well drained soils, capable of adequate compaction, runoff is slow, and erosion hazard is slight. Alderwood soils are not included on the list of hydric soils prepared by the National Technical Committee on Hydric Soils. c. Topoqraphy: The subject property is mostly flat, with an average slope of 3 percent. The property is currently undeveloped, except for an existing single family residence that is located on the northerly most parcel (Lot 7). d. Vegetation: On site vegetation consists primarily of domestic shrubs and grasses, alder, blackbeny, and other native species. All natural vegetation shall be retained on the site except that which will be removed for improvements or grading as approved in the preliminary plat (FWCC Sec. 20-179) and significant trees shall be retained or replaced pursuant to Chapter 22, Zoning. The applicant has identified four (4) significant trees on site, all of which will be lost to required improvements within the right-of-way. Prior to installation of improvements an approved landscape plan is required pursuant to Condition #9 of preliminary plat approval (page 12). e. Wildlife: Small birds and animals (squirrels, field mice, etc.) are likely to inhabit the site. No threatened or endangered species are known or suspected to inhabit the site. Replacement of significant trees as well as incorporation of street trees, buffer open space, and detention pond landscaping into subdivision design, as proposed and as required, will help mitigate the introduction of human activities on wildlife habitat. f. Sensitive Areas: King County and City of Federal Way Sensitive Areas Maps do not reveal the site to be in a problem area relative to landslides, seismic hazards, erosion, wetlands, streams, or 1 DO-year floodplains. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS The property is situated in the southwest portion of the city, in a single family residential area, within approximately 100 feet of the Pierce/King County boundary line. All adjacent properties are developed with single family residences on lots with 7,200 SF or more per dwelling unit. The site is vacant except for one single family residence located on the easterly 4 V. VI. VII. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS (cont'd) parcel of the site (Lot 7). No intent to remove the existing residence is indicated with this application. The existing development contains a detached garage located within five feet of an adjacent proposed propertly line, which does not conform to required yards as established by Federal Way City Code (FWCC). Prior to final plat approval this structure must be removed or relocated to conform to required building setbacks, or lot lines must be adjusted accordingly. This requirement is addressed as Condition #1 of preliminary plat approval (page 11). GENERAL DESIGN a. Subdivision Access and Roadway system: Public access to the proposed subdivision will be provided by a northwesterly extension of SW 346th Place, terminating in a barricade at Lot 7 to prevent through access to SW 344th Street. SW 346th Place currently terminates at the westerly boundary of an adjacent subdivision, Southampton Court. Lot 7 will be accessed from SW 344th Street, over an existing private access easement on the westerly 30 feet of the abutting property to the north, and terminating at the barricade. The public street serving Lots 1-6 and the detention tract will be improved to full-street and half-street standards, as modified and approved by the City. The private access easement to Lot 7 will be maintained to fire district standards. The City Public Works Department and the Fire District have approved the subdivision access and roadway system as modified. See Section VILa. of this report for a detailed description of proposed street improvements. b. Pedestrian system: Sidewalks will be provided along all lot frontages except within the temporary cul-de- sac located in Lots 5 and 6. Specifically, full street improvements include five foot wide sidewalks on both sides of the southerly portion of the street. Half street improvements ib the northerly portion of the street will include a five foot wide sidewalk only on the easterly (developed) side of the street. Currently sidewalks are located on both sides of SW 346th Place. Federal Way School District has indicated that bus transportation will be provided to students residing in this subdivision, with routine adjustments to bus stop locations based on student transportation needs. c. Landscape buffers and open space: In accordance with FWCC Chapter 20, Subdivisions, landscaped buffers are specified only when the plat is adjacent to an incompatible zoning district. The proposed plat is bordered on all sides by single family residential zoning, therefore, no formal buffers are required. Street trees, when mature, and screening of the detention tract, will contribute to visual buffering. Street tree requirements are described in VILa; open space requirements are described in Vlll.b., and detention tract screening in IX.c.; below. TRANSPORTATION a. Street Improvements: In accordance with the FWCC, all street improvements must be dedicated as City right-of-way and improved to full street standards. Specifically, full street improvements are required for the southerly portion of the street 5 VIII. VII. a. TRANSPORTATION: Street Improvements (cont'd) '. extension of SW 346th Place and will include: 28 feet of pavement, vertical curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street trees, within a 56-foot right-of-way width. This street section will serve Lots 1 through 4 and a portion of Lot 5 before terminating a temporary cul-de-sac. North of this point the street section will transition to half street improvements, as modified and approved by the Public Works Department (See Exhibit I), and will include: 20 feet of pavement, curb and gutter, with sidewalk and street trees on the easterly (developed) side only, and continuing to the north property boundary of Lot 7, within a 30 foot right-of-way. At the applicant's request, Lot 7 will continue to be accessed from SW 344th Street over an existing private access easement, and will continue to be addressed to SW 344th. The private easement will not be a public street and will not be improved to City standards. However, it will be maintained for emergency access consistent with fire district standards, Le. unobstructed 20-foot width, 12-foot all weather surface, and vertical clearance of 13'6". As proposed, the temporary barricade will prohibit through access from the public street to the private access easement. The temporary cul- de-sac and barricade will be removed with future street improvements at this location as required and approved by the City. The City Public Works Department and King County Fire District 39 have approved roadway improvements, curve radius, cul-de- sac configuration, access easement and barricade as proposed. Barricade design must conform to fire district and City standards. Requirements related to the temporary cul-de-sac and barricade are addressed as Conditions #5 and #6 of preliminary plat approval (page 12). Pursuant to plat conditions as previously established for the adjacent subdivision of Southampton Court, the applicant will be required to relinquish the temporary cul-de- sac that is currently situated at the southeast boundary of the proposed subdivision site and to install street improvements at this location as required by the City. This requirement is addressed as Condition #4 of preliminary plat approval (page 12). The plat is exempt from street lighting requirements pursuant to FWCC Sec. 22- 1522. However, installation of street lighting will be encouraged in the interest of safety, security and convenience of subdivision residents. b. Adequacy of Local Street: The preliminary plat was reviewed by the City's Traffic Analyst with respect to any potential traffic impacts and mitigation requirements. It was determined that the size of the project and existing traffic conditions do not warrant a traffic impact analysis nor any pro rata share contributions to any off site improvements. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Schools: As part of the City's review of the proposal, the preliminary plat application was referred to the Federal Way School District for comments. Comments were received on October 21, 1996 and included the following information. Under current District boundaries the proposed subdivision will be served by bus transportation to Green Gables Elementary School, Saghalie Junior High Schoof and Decatur High School. School service areas are reviewed annually and may be adjusted to accommodate enrollment growth and new development. 6 VIII. a. PUBLIC SERVICES: Schools (cont'd) Bus stops for the elementary school are located at 31 st Place SW and SW 346th Place and at 32nd Avenue SW and SW 344th Street. The bus stop for the junior high is located at 31 st Court SW and 31 st Place SW, and the bus stop for the high school is located at 35th Avenue SW and SW 342nd Street. Bus stops may also be adjusted depending on student transportation needs. As noted in VILa, above, sidewalks will be provided within the subdivision and will connect to adjacent existing sidewalks, providing safe accessibility by school age children to nearby bus stops. School impact fees, as authorized by City ordinance and collected at the time of building permit issuance, are currently $1,707 per single family housing unit. Schoo impact fees are determined on the basis of the District's Capital Facilities Plan and are subject to annual adjustment and update. b. Open Space: The nearest City park is Alderdale Park, located at 2700 SW 341 st Place, approximately one-half mile to the northeast of the site. Other public parks in the vicinity include Olympic View Park, approximately one mile north of the site; Crescent Heights Park in Tacoma, approximately one mile west of the site; and Dash Point State Park, approximately 1.5 miles northwest of the site. To provide adequate recreational opportunities commensurate with new residential development, FWCC Chapter 20, Subdivisions, requires subdivisions to dedicate land on site for open space, or to seek acceptable alternatives under FWCC Sec. 19- 41, Methods of Mitigation. Specifically, FWCC Sec. 20-155(b) requires all residential subdivisions to provide open space in the amount of "15 percent of the gross land area of the subdivision site; or if the site is five acres or less in size, applicants may seek alternative methods of providing the required open space as permitted by Sec. 19-41 et. seq., if acceptable to the City." In the subject case, because the site is less than five acres in size (2.09 acres), the applicant is eligible to seek altemative methods to providing the required open space on site. Sec. 19- 46 provides an opportunity to pay a "fee in lieu of' reservation of all or portions of the open space area required. Total open space required for this plat is 13,656 square feet(15% of 91,040). Pursuant to the above noted code provisions, the applicant proposes to provide a portion of the required open space on site and fee-in-lieu for the balance of the required open space. Specifically, the applicant proposes to provide 1,700 square feet of buffer open space between Lot 6 and the detention tract (2% of the required 13,656 square feet, as permitted by FWCC Sec. 22-155(3), and to meet the balance of the requirement (13,656-1,700=11,956) by payment of an open space fee. In accordance with FWCC Sec. 19-46, the exact open space fee will be calculated by determining the amount of open space which is required times the then-current market value per square foot of similarly situated property. This requirement is addressed as condition #3 of preliminary plat approval (page 12). c. Fire Protection: A Certificate of Water Availability from the City of Tacoma (Exhibit G) indicates that water is available to the site in sufficient quantity to satisfy fire flow standards for the proposed development. Fire protection for Lots 1-6 will be provided from a fire hydrant located in the approximate center of the subdivision as approved 7 VIII. IX. c. UTI UTI ES a. b. c. PUBLIC SERVICES: Fire Protection (cont'd) by the fire district. For Lot 7, which will continue to be addressed to SW 344th Street, emergency access and fire flow must be made available from SW 344th Street, as required and approved by the fire district. The preliminary plat drawing does show a fire hydrant on SW 344th Street. The exact location of this hydrant must be approved by the fire district. This provision is addressed as conditions #2 of preliminary plat approval (page 11). Sewage Disposal: The applicant proposes to serve the proposed plat by a public sewer system managed by Lakehaven Utility District. A Certificate of Sewer Availability (Exhibit H) dated March 20, 1996, indicates the District's capacity to serve the proposed development through a Developer Extension Agreement between the applicant and the District. Water Supply: The applicant proposes to serve the subdivision with a public water supply and distribution system managed by the City of Tacoma Public Utilities Division. A Certificate of Water Availability (Exhibit G) dated March 18, 1996, indicates the City of Tacoma's capacity to serve the proposed development by an extension of the existing water main at SW 346th Place. The City of Federal Way Departments of Community Development and Public Works concur with this recommendation. Drainage Facilities: Development of the site will create additional runoff from new impervious surfaces such as streets, driveways, and rooftops. The proposed storm drainage system includes on site detention pond, oil/water separators and water quality biofiltration swale. The detention pond and biofiltration swale will be provided on a separate drainage tract and dedicated to the City. Storm drainage facilities are required to be designed in accordance with all applicable requirements under the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Additionally, the site is located in the South Lower Puget Sound Sub-Basin, in an area identified by the Executive Proposed Basin Plan: Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound, as having downstream conveyance, flooding, erosion, and habitat problems associated with storm water runoff. Therefore, the applicant must either analyze those downstream problems and prove appropriate mitigation as approved by the City; or alternatively, as an option which the applicant has chosen to exercise, provide mitigation as recommended in the Basin Plan. Specifically, Basin-Wide Recommendation #BW-2 calls for the use of a 7-day storm event in sizing on site detention facilities instead of the 24-hour event generally used, when on site infiltration can not be achieved (as has been demonstrated by the applicant's technical analysis) and runoff must be discharged off site or stored on site. However, the 30% safety factor is not required to be used in facility design. Storm water runoff generated from the site will be routed through on site facilities and discharged via a closed conveyance system to an existing outfall point at SW 344th Street. Storm water runoff will be released at a controlled rate in accordance with the KCSWDM and the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan. 8 IX. c. UTILITIES: Drainage Facilities (cont'd) Design and construction of drainage facilities in accordance with the KCSWDM and the Hylebos Creek Basin Plan is addressed as Condition #10 of preliminary plat approval (page 13). Public utilities and facilities such as detention/retention ponds are required to be screened from adjacent uses and rights-of-way as required by FWCC Sec. 22-1565. This requirement is addressed in Condition #9 (page 12). X. ANALYSIS OF DECISIONAL CRITERIA The Federal Way City Code (FWCC) establishes review procedures and decisional criteria for deciding upon various types of land use applications. Pursuant to FWCC Chapter 20, Subdivisions, Sec. 20-111, preliminary plat applications are reviewed under Process III. Under this process the Hearing Examiner is required to make a recommendation to the City Council, who will then decide upon the application. Following is an analysis of the applicable decisional criteria established at FWCC Sec. 22-490: a. Process III Decisional Criteria: Pursuant to FWCC Sec. 22-490, the Hearing Examiner may recommend approval of the proposed preliminary plat only if the following decisional criteria are met. Decisional criteria and staff responses are provided below. 1. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff comment: The application is subject to the adopted 1995 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), which designates the property as Single Family - High Density. The proposed land use, Single Family Residential, 7,200 square foot minimum lot size (RS-7.2) is consistent with density allowances and policies applicable to this land use as established in the FWCP. 2. The project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the Federal Way City Code Staff comment: The preliminary plat application is required to comply with the provisions of the Federal Way City code, Chapter 18, Environmental Policy; Chapter 20, Subdivisions; Section 19-46, Methods of Mitigation; and all other applicable codes and regulations. Future development of the residential subdivision will be required to comply with all applicable development codes and regulations. As proposed, and with conditions as recommended by staff, the preliminary plat will comply with all applicable codes and regulations. 3. The project is consistent with the public health, safety. and welfare. Staff comment: The proposed preliminary plat would permit development of the site consistent with the current Single Family High Density land use classification of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Map. Proposed access and fire hydrant locations must meet all requirements of the Fire District. Future development of the plat in accordance with applicable codes and regulations will ensure protection of the public health, safety and welfare. 9 x. XI. ANALYSIS OF DECISIONAL CRITERIA (cont'd) b. Preliminary Plat Approval Criteria: Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, Subdivisions, the Hearing Examiner shall review the preliminary plat for compliance with Section 20-2, Purpose, and design criteria and development standards of the Chapter; all other applicable ordinances and regulations of the City; and requirements of RCW Chapter 58.17, the Subdivision and Platting Act. Staff comment: Development of this site is required to comply with the provisions of Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, Subdivisions; FWCC Chapter 18, Environmental Protection; FWCC Section 19-46, Methods of Mitigation; and all other applicable local and state development codes and regulations. As proposed and as recommended by City staff, the preliminary plat application complies with all applicable statutues, codes and regulations. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS Based on an analysis of the proposed action, the environmental record and related decisional criteria, the Department of Community Development Services finds that: 1. The site is comprised of two parcels. One is currently vacant and the other contains an occupied single family residence. All adjacent land uses are single family residential. 2. Zoning for the site and adjacent parcels is RS-7.2. The proposed residential subdivision and density is consistent with existing adjacent land uses and zoning. The existing single family residence contains a detached garage that is enchroaching within the required side yard setback as established by the FWCC. Prior to final plat approval. the structure must be removed or the adjacent lot line adjusted for code conformance. 3. A Environmental Determination of Non-Significance (MONS) was issued for this proposed action on March 1, 1997. The comment and appeal period for this determination was completed March 30, 1997. No comments or appeals were received and the decision was finaled with no modification. This determination is incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. 4. Water and sewer facilities are available from SW 346th Place and are adequate to serve the proposed development. It is the applicant's responsibility to secure all necessary water and sewer services from the appropriate utility provider. 5. Surface water facilities will be designed in accordance with the KCSWDM and the Hylebos Creek Plan and are adequate to serve the development. 6. Public access to Lots 1 through 6 and the detention tract site will be provided by a northwesterly extension of SW 346th Place. Access to Lot 7 will be provided by an existing private access easement from SW 344th Street. 10 XI. XII. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS (cont'd) 7. Southwest 346th Place is currently designated as a Local Street by the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. Full street improvements within a 56-foot right-of-way are required for the southerly half of the subdivision. Street requirements for the northerly extension of the street, as modified and approved by the Public Works Department, will include half-street improvements on the easterly (developed) side of the street, within a 3D-foot right-of-way. The public right of way and the stormwater detention tract will be dedicated to the City. 8. Pursuant to FWCC Sec. 20-155 and FWCC Sec. 19-46, the applicant proposes to provide a percentage of the required open space and to pay an open space fee as an altemative mitigation measure for the balance of required open space. Pursuant to FWCC 19-46(c), the applicant will be required to submit an appraisal of similarly situated property for the City to calculate the exact amount to be paid to the City Parks fund. The on site buffer open space will be segregated as a separate tract and owned and maintained by the subdivision property owners. 9. Prior to issuance of construction permits the applicant will be required to submit a landscape plan addressing open space buffer, detention tract screening, street trees, and retention and/or replacement of significant trees. 10. The proposed preliminary plat is permitted by Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Zoning; and Chapter 20, Subdivisions; subject to Process III review. 11. The proposed subdivision and all attachments have been reviewed for compliance with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP); Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Zoning; Chapter 18, Environmental Protection; Chapter 20, Subdivisions; Section 19-46, Methods of Mitigation, and all other applicable codes and regulations. As proposed and recommended by staff, the preliminary plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and all applicable codes and regul?tions. 12. Prior to final plat approval and recording, all required and approved improvements will be constructed, or the improvements appropriately bonded, per City code requirements. RECOMMENDATION Based on review of this application, the Mitigated Determination of Environmental Non- Significance and pertinent decisional criteria, the Department of Community Development Services recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to final plat approval the existing structure on Lot 7, located within five feet of the proposed south property line, must be removed or relocated to conform to building setbacks requirements as established by Federal Way City Code (FWCC); or lot lines must be adjusted accordingly. 2. Prior to final plat approval the required off-site fire hydrant must be installed at SW 344th Street at a location approved by King County Fire District #39, or alternative fire protection measures implemented for Lot #7, as approved by the fire district. 11 XII. RECOMMENDATION (cont'd) 3. Pursuant to the applicant's proposal to pay a fee in lieu of reserving a portion of on site open space, as provided by the FWCC, a current market value analysis of similar1y situated property must be submitted to the City to determine the amount of the open space fee under this agreement. Payment of the open space fee shall be required prior to final plat approval. 4. The existing temporary cul-de-sac easement located east of the site at the existing terminus of SW 346th Place shall be relinquished and documents filed with the City for recording. The applicant is responsible to prepare and submit the necessary documents in a form approved by the City. The applicant shall reconstruct the cul- de-sac area to match the existing improvements. Design and construction of this street section shall conform to Public Works standards and shall include sidewalks and street trees within the planter strip, as approved by the City. 5. Design and location of the temporary barricade adjacent to Lot 7 shall be approved by the City of Federal Way and King County Fire District 39. This temporary barricade shall be removed with future right-of-way improvements, as required and approved by the City. 6. The proposed temporary cul-de-sac easement located in Lots 5 and 6 shall be relinquished with future right-of-way improvements at this location, and the area reconstructed, as required and approved by the City. 7. Retention/detention facilities used to control runoff from the site to off-site drainage courses shall be located in a detention tract dedicated to the City at the time of final plat approval, unless located within improved public rights-of-way. 8. The final plat drawing must establish the open space buffer in an open space tract to be owned in common and maintained by property owners of the proposed subdivision, and prohibiting removal or disturbance of landscaping within the tract, except as necessary for maintenance or replacement of existing plantings and as approved by the City. The open space buffer shall be landscaped to achieve and maintain a visual buffer pursuant to FWCC Chapter 20-155 and Sec. 22-1565(c)(1), as approved by the City and pursuant to Condition 9#, below. 9. Prior to issuance of construction permits a landscape plan, prepared by a licensed landscape architect, shall be submitted to the City for approval, and shall include the following elements: (a) (b) (c) (d) Open space buffer landscaping; Street trees in planter strips inside plat boundaries and off-site as required by Condition #4, above; Significant tree replacement plan; and Visual screening of all property boundaries of the detention tract from adjacent properties and the right-of-way with landscaping and/or fencing. 12 XII. RECOMMENDATION (cont'd) 10. Prior to final plat approval, all required improvements must be completed or the improvements appropriately bonded, per City code requirements. Design and construction of plat improvements shall conform to Federal Way City Code, the King County Surface Water Design Manual, the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan, and all other applicable codes and regulations. LIST OF EXHIBITS A: B: C: D: E: F: G: H: I: Plat Map (full size plat map to Hearing Examiner only) Vicinity Map Legal Description Zoning Map SEPA decision dated March 1 t 1997 Level 1 Downstream Analysis and Narrative, dated March, 1996 Certificate of Water Availability, dated March 18, 1996 Certificate of Sewer Availability, dated March 20, 1996 Public Works Street Improvement Modification Letter, dated October 24, 1996 13 -IT GRANVILLE PLACE PREUMINARY PLAT SECTION 24. TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH. RANGE 3 EAST. W.M. Jo.-.J1-..1 ~ ~ "'u.W. -: =.. ":"":';'w ---~ -----.. ----_. - --.'"-... I"!PICA1. AOAD SB:T1ON ~ HAlF $TREET A(W) SECTJON' --- ..... .,' c. eo :æ +-' CO - 0. >~ "- CO c: .- E .- - Q)' ,,- C~ SURVEYOR /ÐOGIHŒR ~:.. ~ SITE DATA -- ... --... --......-.- -""..-- - ..--- _......~ -~-~ ----- A-- ---- u. ~~ :I:W )(CJ W~ :'S: » :;;0 --'" c..o ""'" '.0.: --.W'----.--- """-----_w"",,,,-- -.-'--- -......--..--.......- =:. ~ - ......--. . - --- .. - --'" ~ ~ l c (" ( , 5:; . ; ;: .1 r' it 2 w ~I.¡ ; g d §I; , ¡ ! 11"0,1 "'1'1' ~ t 1 'I ,\,'th ~ . 'I ~ . '1\'!1 ~ - I'II (.) ,,'iiI, llJ I /1 l- I jll. t) i I JI,' ~~ 'h'l: II~~ . !H:ET .!.CF.!. ...- ~ r, . r r . "~)t~~;~7:~\~';:~<i:f;""": ' ,", O' - ?(:~þ;t'¡"1..': . ,',;>';'.,'..:: . . " . '" >" .;;) ...' , , , .. . . -. '..:: , .' '. -... .. . ~\~49TH ST .-, .. ,. .-:. . c~~'¡ ..' ~ ~,;~1 .~ßL:"~v-o,~ . . . . '. - "". MAP". . ". '. . .. . ,~\..:.' :', - - ~~~~? -\- ,:..--_..~~...-_. ---- 'ß ',.:1; LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT I, IN SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2/ NORTH, RANGE 3 EAS' W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOTI, WHICH IS 103L51 FEET WESTERLY OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF: THENCE SOUTH 00'17'07" WEST 232.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH' 00'17'07" WEST 497.37 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WI'fH THE KING COUNTY LINE: THENCESOUTH 46'47'43" EAST 217.12 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00"7'07" EAS 645.22 FEET; THENCE 89'42' WEST ON A LINE PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT I 159.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH ALL EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. ALL IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. THE FOREGOING LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS BASED 'ON A PROPERTY SURVEY.FOR MR. GENE F. SIMS, BY ROBERT R. SADLER AND ASSOCIATES, DATED MARCH 17, 1976, DRAWING #76-100. --- _. -..----.--- EXHIBIT ~-f- PAGE-1-0F ) 9 to to to 00 q- i. , r<> I 0 0 z J .9 ~ o; . C1I 30 N ff., . I/o -4.3ß ,/.5 79(, /48.05 " "'-!Jð"'/~ /2.5 II~ ~. I <;.,s'ly 'J' 0":1' ~ ~ Ar-' 0 3" . '<) @~ /48.S ~" ~Cþ "c.. ~r \. :.. @ I ~. ! /25 9 þ.(,- \.ø @ R-2 (Pierce County) ""-"8 r/ 5ðO /05' 58'-42-':;3£ AS 7.2 I~ ~ II¡ tot I <> ~(/ \,Ib r ~', "It< 0'6 N 8' -42°'.53 W /Z~ '" 1fJ-":'> la,'? A- þ..c,. 0.1- @ ~ r:. ...... CO ': ~ (¡) "~ I.D . 0 0) , N: II¡ "- I}' ~,,; ~'Þ ; :-. R) ,..: - - f'o... f'o... i,,¿ z I I() ~ 0 I.D f'o... 0 Q.. CI') U ~ 1G 51 ßO' ,,-c;,. .f}?_.. 'éj 'V ~.s- ~ ~"v' " I \ , ' 'z.,d '" I' ~: If) II) " 0 I t¡'Þ ,0" tJ, cfJ " t¡ '" w t ~ 0 Q 2 <> ~;¡: a Þ> 0 .C2: T\\f~ ~ ~ \~ !It..''''";> C\J CJ C\J ,s ~ ö: ....IA. ~ Ii) ~ \) ~ ¡þ~ 0\ Goo 13 1{J ! . : ,~ 'N ~I ~~ , ~~'-~ /.:10 4."~('P) .'" t . :'¿~:':';}L:'}~' .'. 4-!Jl!fl/.sð /76 ----r- I I '" \\: '-' ~ ~ -J i ~. II, It G) ',~r- "I'.'ø~0 01>< \ I / /75 5ß.G4 115. eo 521.ß1- w -. ~- 135 . . . '~I ßç, ~. ~. -!-', i' ~e>:n '.. .' -'V't..1-". 2.4 ~4-j1;':J' - ^ 0 a '5" ",.,1 '.. :ZONING MAP EXHIBIT ~ PAGE-LOF -+-- "'" ~jN II O\~...... '~~-:""ö~ -s¿. r-..: - A "t- . ~ ..;. . Iv V - <J:) ~ ". . .<:1 '(T : . c,G," "", \0 '!I': ~- .< ~ ,,?p^ /: n~ ., . . ~ - - ~ ~r-I~""~ . -- - -- . ~-==-- ~ '-- ~~ ¡:::¡y- 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH (206) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NO.: SEP96-0015 Description of Proposal: SEPA - PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 7 LOTS. Proponent: BOB WOODFORD Location: BTWEN SW 30TH & 35TH AT 346TH Lead Agency: city of Federal Way The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following decision based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist, the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, the "Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist; Application No. SEP96-0015" for this action, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington state Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to R.C.W. 43.21C.060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under R.C.W. 43.21C.032(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This ONS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on 03/16/97. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Contact Person: Lori Michaelson Schill Senior Planner Phone: 661-4000 Responsible Official: Gregory D. Moore, AICP Date issued: 03/01/97 signature: Director of community DevelopmentEXHIBIT services PAGE-J-°F --1- 33530 First Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003 ,¿((~~ ~ Position/Title: Address: ;.' - .-0- ---~--------_._-_._--_...- ._--- -----------------.---------- . c ( LEVEL ONE DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS FOR PRELIMINARY PlAT OF WOODFORD/HOLM FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Prepared for: Mr. Robert Woodford 25105 - 9th Avenue South . DesMoines, Washington 98198 Project Manager: Prepared by: P AC-1ECH Engineering, me. 2601 South 35th - Suite 200 Tacoma, Washington 98409 (206) 473-4491 File #51656/1 March, 1996 6,d~~ ~.~ Granville N. Horn EXHIBIT ~ PAGEf-°F ~ . .. _w_-: - - ---'--.--..-----.-- -- .--- --_.-- --' - . . ¡- (- ( OFF-SITE ANALYSIS: The area as delineated on the off-site drainage area map includes both developed and undeveloped conditions. The plat south and southwest of the site (Stonegate) has been improved with a storm system of its own. The area considered as contributing to the proposed project was the yards and landscape areas north and east of the existing roads. Based on the aerial topography maps of Federal Way, a portion of the two lots to the west also appear to drain toward the site. However, this was difficult to ascertain from the field inspection. The unimproved areas were brush, alders, and grass, similar in cover to the site. No erosion of any kind was observed from the off-site area, as the flows are sheet flow in nature. ON-SITE ANALYSIS: Site vegetation includes alder, brush, some coßÜers, and grass. This vegetation exists mostly over the southern end of the property. Near the existing house on the lot to be included in the subdivision, there is an isolated rise to the ground, most of which is grass vegetation. Surface water runoff appears to continue around this isolated high spot to the west side and progresses on toward the road. DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS: Flows leave the site along S.W. 344th and enter a ditch along the south side of the road. The ditch is approximately 2 feet wide at the bottom. Side slopes are heavily vegetated at approximately 2:1 slope. Ditches and culverts have been plugged by sloughing from the sides in some cases. Slope of the ditch is difficult to identify except for ground or roads which slope to the west. The ditch flows west approximately 18 feet, enters a 12-inch concrete culvert under the driveway, and flows through the culvert approximately 20 feet. The ditch then continues to the west at a fairly flat slope; standing water appears in the bottom. The side slope on the south is fairly steep, almost 1-1/2:1 (1:1 in some cases). The slope on the north side is gentle, approximately 2 or 3:1:'-The ditch runs for approximately 56 feet, passing through a 12-inch concrete culvert under a driveway. The culvert is approximately half filled with debris and dirt. The length is approximately 21 feet. The ditch continues to the west. It is heavily vegetated with grass and slopes approximately 2: 1 on both sides for approximately 36 feet. It then enters an 18-inch-diameter concrete culvert, that flows north under S.W. 344th Street (Point 1). Approximately 10 feet further west is an S-inch culvert under another driveway, but flows appear to turn and travel north, rather than continue west in the S-inch pipe. The culvert under S.W. 344th Street is approximately 41 feet long and exits in another grass- lined ditch on the north side of the road. Flows appear (from grass pattern) to then go to the west toward 35th Avenue S.W. No erosion or scouring was noticed at any of these 1 EXHIBIT ,: PAGE~~ - .. '--""- .-.. --.--------- " ( c-- culverts crossing under driveways. The ditch seems to become shallow approximately 55 feet west of the last lS-inch invert; the slope is probably 4:1 on the roadside, 2:1 on the northern, or property, side. Due to a low bank on the property side in this area, the ditch flows, should they overtop, would flow parallel to the ditch and not flood adjacent buildings or yards. The bottom width is approximately 1 to 1.5 feet. The ditch takes a turn to the north, following 35th Avenue S.W. approximately 101 feet from the lS-inch outfall following the contour of the road. At 161 feet past the lS-inch culvert outfall, the ditch combines with a pipe coming from the south under S. W. 344th Street (Point 2). The pipe is an lS-inch concrete culvert with some rip rap and filter fabric adjacent to it. Scouring from the existing ditch as it cascades down around the pipe has eroded quite a bit of soil, as is evident in the bottom of the ditch further north. Side slopes are 1:1 in some cases at the pipe; little vegetation exists roughly 20 feet from the pipe. The IS-inch pipe comes from a development south of S.W. 344th. A pond, constructed as part of an unfinished plat, discharges from the wet pond located on the east side of the road of 35th Avenue S.W. The swale continues north, paralleling 35th Avenue S.W., approximately 150 feet, where it enters an lS-inch CMP. The ditch before this point has sediments in the bottom, but vegetation has prevented major scouring. The IS-inch CMP is approximately 14 feet long and has some sediment in the bottom. The ditch continues with the bottom from 1.5 to 2 feet wide. Side slopes are approximately 2:1 on the Holm side and approximately 2:1 on the roadside. The ditch continues for approximately 460 feet and enters an N12 corrugated metal pipe 12 inches in diameter. Ditch depth to this point is approximately 2 to 2.5 feet, with approximately a 1- to lo5-foot bottom. N12 is approximately 45 feet long, beveled on both ends, and passes under.a private residence driveway. The ditch continues for approximately 44 feet beyond the last culvert. The ditch bottom is approximately 1 foot wide. Some scouring appears, and there is loose rock in the bottom. There is little vegetation. The slope on the house side seems to be part of the resident's landscaping with flowers. Water then enters a 12-inch concrete culvert. No headwall exists, although no scouring is evident. A 12-inch concrete culvert approximately 38 feet long passes under a double driveway serving 2 lots to the east. Flows continue north in a well vegetated ditch approximately 51 feet. Bottom width is more or less 2 feet now, although there are 2 deposits of gravel that appear to have been caused by flows through this ditch. Flows then enter another 12-inch concrete culvert under a driveway, approximately 25 feet long. No scouring is observed at either inlet or outlet of this. The ditch resumes for approximately 60 feet. The bottom width is less than 1 foot. Side slopes are vegetated with grass. Flows then enter a 12-inch concrete culvert under the driveway and flow for approximately 25 feet through the pipe. Flows exiting the 12-inch pipe are met by a large boulder in the middle of the ditch, which has caused scouring around the sides and bottom as it continues its way north. Ditch flows continue for 90 feet. It then enters a 15-inch concrete culvert, continuing north under S.W. 34Oth Place (Point 3). This 15-inch pipe does not appear to tie into any other storm system from the plat to the east, but continues north in a ditch that is somewhat higher than the outfall of the pipe. The 15-inch pipe is approximately 75 feet long. The ditch widens approximately 2 to 3 feet at the bottom in some cases. As it nears the intersection of 35th Avenue S.W. and S.W. 340th 2 EXHI;T ~ PAGE ~ ( f: Street, the slope on the roadside becomes almost 1.5:1 (probably 2:1 on the property side). The ditch continues for 75 feet toward the intersection and enters a 12-inch CMP with a trash rack, which apparently enters a closed storm system at this point. Flows to the 12-inch CMP continue in approximately 10 feet of the CMP to a Type I basin located north of the end of the ditch. This basin is located at the curb return of existing sidewalk that is at the southeast comer of the intersection. A 12-inch CMP exit basin on the north side and proceeds due north of the flowline on 35th Avenue S.W. approximately 38 feet to a Type II manhole marked ItSEWERIt (Point 4). A 21-inch CMP with a slide gate and 21-inch riser exits west from this manhole. A 30-inch CMP exits the same manhole structure to the north. This point was approximately 1,500 feet downstream of the site and the terminus of this downstream inspection. Sitts and Hill is completing as-built information at the intersection of S. W. 34Oth and 35th Avenue S.W. Additional information regarding storm size and direction from this intersection may be obtained from them. A Type II catch basin on the west side of 35th Avenue S.W., just north of S.W. 340th Street, has a 21- or 24-inch CMP, with flows going to the north. How this connected with the system at the intersection is not known. There is no storm system, either closed or open, on the west side of 35th Avenue S.W. between S.W. 344th and S.W. 34Oth. Flows from the intersection ofS.W. 34Oth and 35th Avenue S.W. appear to continue north on 35th Avenue S.W. to approximately S.W. 338th Street, where they turn east. Just east of 33rd Place S.W. the flows discharge to a large drainage ravine and continue flowing north. RqxxtsI # S 16S&'G NHJb j a 3 EXH 111T ,: PAGE ~ "'.h." 'Yo. 'iW6.3 X\ -«)7.1 X -«)6.2 \~ X --'Tx 401.2 I ( q / -«)5.9 X X l X X 405.3 W::l l \ \ -«)6.~ -""'" X' X IW~.B x X -«)7.2 X -«)7.3 ~7.9 X ., .-«)7.7 G::9 ;., ".. V~' . -«)2.9 -', Cr' l X 1407.1 - Î ..... X X +1 ~ X I <06.6 (' / \ .012" ('Iv -«J6.6 .---L,~ X -«)7,3 X +17.2 X ;,6 J L-l x Ux y' -435.3 437.8 437.5 X <> X 4374 "8~9 G 437.0 X 438.2 X X 1 ) \ ;. ~ CÐ ) r8.~ x x 378.7 382.0 X l, ,~í '----.) +0 2 b X ff? ,1: , r. ~ ~ 'I 1-:5. , ;. 8 'c ) TV f~ .378. X ~ 000i60.. 376.6 X C}" X .378.2':" '"",,';;" , ""' 'F (' X 378.6 379,.3 X .38'.3 X, S.W. 340TH ST. ------- 402.: X 0 X 402.1 4-0.3.8 X I I I X 140u 406.2° \0 X X +05.3 406.7 X D36~s 00 0 ., X .387.1 X / /. X.382.6 383.6 X 387.6 X X 405.9 X r! ~ "'-06,.3 X 408.8 X +07.1 X 406.5 X ><407..Ir ~07.9 G2J 402.9 412.1 >< @ .11,~ U.. Q R () 0 0 ~I 412.8 '¡,( X 407.7 X 1+07.1 X {06.6 ( " \ O~X12'6 ~V 406.6 X ì 0 408.4 X I diJ 407.3 >-.." '---I 4O6.i ì. 4();\.8 x œ- . ".,fJ'\ 0' ~¡n x 4O~' \)'40 .8 ~. 40~.3 3 406 ~ X' 40~.7 X ~ /1/ <O~~- ~.~:;; {I 0 ' 401.2 r X I X 0 \ 4O2.g I X 1.3 X 1404.8 '~6.3 X{: X .~ 4O8.g . X . '(-l - ~..o:Jr. .,~, ,"" Cl"j~ ~". I'--. ~ 0 U : . -~ \ X ,412.8 -'." \...~ 411',1 t . X [Jb ----- X 407.2 X 407.3 ~7.g Œ2J 4O2.g [3°.4 "6.6 X '- . j--~ -------'-..-/ 421,7 l X : 3.6 . X : 2 438.' X :11 .~ " \I) ã ' Al. ~~ ¡3 ~Î- :%~ 8J "L x "£6C X Ç'C6C , -tl6C .j x 6'Z6C x rn x : x t'l6C : '~I,;, L X C'L9C x n9C x 9'9a£ I I I ~r 1 I "9 .'.'.: X f :r " 9'£9C nac I I X ~ X X ! D ac Z'£9C i , [' 1 " X a'C9£ a'zacX '15 HlOt\: 'M'S X t'lac x .'9LC x C'6LC x X caLC .'a J .~ ...t'aLCX '~ x . "'. 'aLC 9'9LC . :"L~,F;; X . ,.ot 0 [~] 0 ~~D r--.... ",,6õO """ -f 4OU \ L...-J .' ,'. ~ .., ., -.. ~-.s ~ .oÚ ,,'.' ~ ..... ~ ~ ..U ~ ~ .o'" ~ .o'" ..... ~ _A ~ ."., ~ tu " -t- ../ /--¡ ~ / "- ~ ""1 .IO" " . "O'- ..... ~ ..... ~ ..... " Dc;JCJ( ..... .,."'" EX,"UB\T k fi PAGE~Of \ \I ~ lOO ' ~ó\~ ~~l1íO~' ,~A- .- 'J .. ... ( ~ PAC - TECH Eng;nee,,~g Inc. ~ Engineers / Planners / Surveyors / Environmental ¡ . , I Specialists FOR: W~~.b j'WJI.-I-Á ~,-Þ.-i ~\ r\1r.\{\~'ì' FILE NO. 51<05(0 TASK NO. \ PAGE 2601 South 35th. Suite 200 . Tacoma. WA 98409-7479 . 473-4491 3640 South Cedar. Suite A . Tacoma. WA 98409-5700 . 473-4491 12nOGatewayDrive.Suite212. SeatUe.WA98166-3333. 243-7112 3721 Kitsap Way, Suite 4 . Bremerton. WA 96312-2461 . 377-2053 PREPARED BY: 6..1'4 ~ CHECKED BY: ; ! '--'----' , -;- ...~- 1 , -0- . ~----L~r . ¡ ,- - --I ---.-- ¡.. - t:c:--;C,st(:).~~\~, ¡:, !~:J;t-...)~ \,,~ 1 ¡ . j.j !.'~~ \--- I ;[(W~\ 1'/4 Fve+\\--:-h¿L ¡, ;.' -. ..' , ;, 'W.,..L__-5__("_\-- -¡-i:\'~.. ,'-':.l,\¿,-' II ~Wr.-\ ,\ r,.\ '(':'C:- r--,,\;>"p-,-C1. ¡,~.F\ ... .. .~,---,-,-,.~_\_-.....J-, _;_L.!_J::-_.!../-,----~.._=-----t. _..,.¡.!-J_----- DOw ",- """"t:~. ~,,"i\~,.lkDò,;t:: ~XHrBrt . F .' PAGE-Jð-LOF -2£ i ! '--(: : ¡'r;) ~-4-J:::>j- -- j , I, . \,.j~-e:i.h\ \ ú..jÞ-'\.\O ~.) , ._.1.5._1'0.- _Qs~:_TJ:i¿. ". ( ~ PAC - TECH Enginee,;ng. In~ ~ Engineers / Planners / Surveyors / Environmental Specialists FOR: '. Woo\:JFo~ / \~~ ~a\t'\\ ~~~'I ~\...P'.; FILE NO. 5\G:.51o TASK NO. \ PAGE 2501 South 35th. Suite 200 . Tecoma. WA 98409-7479 . 473-4491 3640 South Cedar. Suite A . Tacoma. WA 98409-5700 . 473-4491 12720 Gateway Drive. Suite 212 . Seattle. WA 98168-3333 . 243-7112 3721 Kitsap Way. Suite 4 . Bremerton, WA 98312-2461 . 377-2053 PREPARED BY: ú..~ ~ CHECKED BY: . Jl:zbt~--J\-\ ~'-;:.~ --;:'~dd:kt~ ,,-,<0, i I -:,-'- ,- ---'-ì-if :J1 cL -+ft,-l,=p~,~t.i=~I~ ~J::i-J~J~, - -~I J,-õ,r -'>r~ I[)¡';k--þ~ c..þj-t~~£,:}.u I :, I I I, ¡-1-I'~-ì I --r-I I ,-r, -i-'ofB' f ~_~Iill,!--+t4't~4>~l:¥~-fI't<~ F,~~~kt~_6., -'CLj,-1,-j+-~"'--,l,-t:..,'",l..'_:,'1,'...,,",-'- 1--:;:, ! 1, ~ l~;;tt~.) \- ~=:trl'^ ¿, T ~: -~J;,:;r.-¡g';¡;~~J~\L7~,' -j--7~kLr '--l-nk,W~ h- ~A~ 1~~1-~~.~ -~ !w'\\lr,l.l? ~ ~ÞR-i~-+~r ;---1-: 'II' 1'1 I! Iii I I" ,I ~I ; II'-t-- '. " b. I -j~-,-t,~- ~n~ - ~ ¿j '~', I I J ~¡, 2W, 1== ( \?.. #- ,', I . -i I' \f~> ~j-. '~~ III! -\+--1-1' l---¡--¡, !iil !, ill i II ,~ :~tt~:~Lj~~~ ~.~Ql;; :j~~ ~ u.~ ~. ek-Wv i~ ti ~ ~ ~,:_~-~~,~ ¡ 1 ! ¡ ¡ I !! I Î I ¡ Ii ¡ I I-I I I i III I Ii! ¡ - , ftJJ,-=~t=:fJtLí+-r..tHt~1tC -I-t,dJ I~,", )-W1.=t -~r!:J9j~~ ~"J.,,-'-l-\ " " ¡kdt')d~:I~~+-IèLQLlill Jill ¡,Ii -¡--ill ,Ii! - , ill+- ;J; i:~lJ ~ ItJI ~JJtl Jd-i q h1 ~ 1 J ¡: ~,F~ .:1 . . ._-~ ilil II/i ht'¡i I,'I!! II," 11'1'1!¡¡'l--! : , I' ,'" '.1- I" I I ,,;;", --i-I~\l---t-- -- r----¡--¡---¡----, -¡--I -- --__¡__n_--¡- -¡-'-iL,! \-r---¡--t-r -T---r, -¡---¡--r-. =tj~t r=tDt t't~ ~i: ~i~~~(" =llt~¡ i:~1 ~t-=tT<;:~l" l eÒ +-+= ~~l1 =1t'~ ' -- , ; ( ì~ \--RÇ£ðLÜREMf~j-J'K=!--rtr2r:- [ ;POgv.¿H~\1!~-T3~nbiê-t j~ ,'_OJj , r--I" . !:¡ ;1,:'- nr"~ I. -~~~¡~, L_J,_",.-_n'-------r---- 1.- ,--fI\~,"-"¡?ÈOP\% ,\ ~~-1'-~ - p'~Q_J~LE if,j d-~..o&fL;_do.l-¡!\{_~Jf'r.)1"(.'n_~'-l~Cg_M: 1,Qk- ¡..n',,__n,!!..,'..! I,:. ~-ì--¡.!_n!. -,-'---- "';, 1- ¡,:,>],,:a+:,:,"'l:,., \J:Vê~f<c:~r,J~!:~.(~ ~D ~~J~~T~,i,:'=¡,~"rr~~-9, ~i, [¿-F' , ' i ¡ :. I ¡ , , ,I I ,: r;!; '!h\;tD~o~~J~)~\\~~,.J~-:4:-\~ú~}~'T¿: À~b~~\¡;J' ~l-\:A~ ~ ;~~\£W\ ~-- ¡,,~~19~ ~--, :\,\", L\:)ç~":~,JJSi.¡¿¿",f~) - 'L,'_6E._d~!i:'ú,~~-\,) .\:I_~\.\A_b~ f'. I ~~L\~\t-'i\C(J\-,- \\\;.:::b\C\ld--~\O\) \è-¿'I?O'\2T ;~(-\ì IÀcCó\J.,,~d'r:=::J -,,--<l-;= f:.'¡-...\ i :,';. ¡. ;,' .¡ 'E~HIBIT ì - : t>~~ \'-\r ":)Ub yA \ ~¿\::.:; ~\O --;;"_',':~, l.,\-r"_{ - PAGE' , 'OF .' ( ~ PAC - TECH Eng;nee"ng. Inc. i ~ Engineers I Planners I SUiveyors I Environmental Specialists FOR: ~~::ð~ / \'-\ÒL.~ PL.-AT FILE NO. . 5\b5 þ~\~\}!~ TASK NO. I PAGE 2601 South 35th. Suite 200 . Tacoma, WA 98409-7479 . 473-4491 3640 South Cedar. Suite A . Tacoma, WA 98409-5700 . 473-4491 12720GatewayDriye.Suite212. Seattle,WA98168-3333. 243-7112 3721 Kitsap Way, Suite 4 . Bremerton, WA 98312-2461 . 377-2053 PREPARED BY: (Ä..N I--! CHECKED BY: DATE:3/<i q b SCALE: H ()., , r- -t-- -,-, -'--1 .J i I ---I I i --~ i --! í - i -1 " , , , !~'7sggE"H\ \...>-1, ¡ .' : . , \-V:, "\:";,,F:; C " ,~ ."...-.-'-""', i , , I ,-"",--",o--'-~--- , . :~~,;¿ ¡ M- ~\-:\ Ù Þ>..\5::, L i , , ',. , \\.:.,\~ ~~.lJ~'t:.c::r\: ,,},(,--::-:\,,;O: ¿'è-F~\\"\ f'-C~'.:. ,\ ¡--C' '_._':~ '¿-D , !' ; ¡ .' ¡ - '. ¡, , í"\j~ç--"i'y-...\\L\...... \~-':::=:-C-l.lJfi-:I;::¡ -^.'t-,-/,--.J. ,r'-:..-" ,'" Dr! :=-.\-~ ¡--,-;-:-:_- ¡"-""',';;::"-r~-:~-~t~_.., :"- ¡ '. --+-~---~f--i------------.._--~-----, CA.~W~Ç:.ö.jL \"-!-,J:\,\\t~ï~\Jt'\\CLD'-¡ ~,<_.,~~,\"',,:,~\c;:'- : .' : ' , ,! ¡ - ¡, \,j It-T,,,¿, 7r)\?-Ò~I¿q\:::;': Ts:.Cl:-~:J,;'CÅ'- \'.\-':--:6-ç..:¡.J,i\-."\.J~.1. !. - i'¡C,¡, \t",¿)\ I --- - --'--1----'---- ' . ::"L.d_1 ! I ¡ \:)- í?,~D r-\ ,v,hL.\...- þ~ \\JCl-.J b C2:b -",:::'_.h£fl<Ì-@:I¿\:¿__\\,-\ .--y\J.;¿, -b~~WD\::\_-,_: -._---- . ' ---~A~~Jio&1' m .' ( ~ PAC - TECH Englneedng. Inc. ~ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors I Environmental Specialists FOR: r.\CO~~ /~OU'"^- PLl).T Pi"'-5U H\ ÑÞ- ~'i FILE NO, 5\ 105 Co TASK NO. \ PAGE 2601 South 35th. Suite 200 . Tacoma, WA 98409-7479 . 473-4491 3640 South Cedar. Suite A . Tacoma. WA 98409-5700 . 473-4491 12720GatewayDrive,Suite212. Seattle,WA98168-3333. 243-7112 3721 Kitsap Way, Suite 4 . Bremerton. WA 98312-2461 . 377-2053 PREPARED BY: G-N W- CHECKED BY: DATE:?:J!I4./q" SCALE: N A. , , , , , ' " , : "'r'j -, " "', ---i ¡ ¡ ,¡ ¡ i : ,) "',- i . "--' ---! ,,- _--'_'-h_.'__' --n n,_, -,- --""'-"" I I ,..+----,..." I ,I ¡ "tiL:: E.XHI~lTJ:,"....-..,.. .-- -,-" PAGE-I-'-°F (" ~ PAC - TECH Englneefing. In~ ~ Engineers / Planners / Surveyors / Environmental Specialists F~R: Wcv\JF=b~ II~ Pl.-A "\ p~~ U f-'\[ NA~'-( FILE NO. Sl {;, 5~ TASK NO. \ PAGE 2601 South 35th, Suite 200 . Tacoma. WA 98409-7479 . 473-4491 3640 South Cedar. Suite A . Tacoma. WA 98409-5700 . 473-4491 12720 Gat,¡way Drive, Suite 212 . Seattle, WA 98168-3333 . 243-7112 3721 Kitsap Way. Suite 4 . Bremerton. WA 98312-2461 . 377-2053 PREPARED BY: ú.~4 \.--\ CHECKED BY: - t.i£{E::.i~-:_~_L\-:::' T- , . - - L¡ -.-: - . --;~_i ':;¿~-'=:-'-.QLl_ç.~ \~f~:_L.~_~-----_: I . I c.é)!rS..:JI.:~: t.r r:: ! f . ¡~O ¡dO _~'?ECqL¡ W(\I~ !Q. T-' . ' : . ,'.'" r ( iii PAC - TECH Enginee"ng, in~ ~ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors I Environmentat Specialists FOR: WCúO~D /~'-\A ~L\M\~æ---( \?LA\: FilE NO, 5lb5b TASK NQ. I PAGE 2601 South 35th. Suite 200 . Tacoma, WA 96409- 7479 . 473-4491 3640 South Cedar, Suite A . Tacoma. WA 96409-5700 . 473-4491 12720 Gateway Drive. Suite 212 . Seattle. WA 96166-3333 . 243-7112 3721 Kilsap Way. Suite 4 . Bremerton, WA 96312-2461 . 377-2053 PREPARED BY: G-~ \*- CHECKED BY: ¡- : ,--" , ;, ," ~1 ¡, -i-" --;-i, -I-' , ;". ; . ¡ "J. ~PEc.,\t\L R-:w..U¡REt--'\'¿i"\T ~'~: ~L\~j;;:(~IL_~__¡çd:_. \90¡YR...;F\-cQ]QIb ¡ lrl-!;.r:'"r~"-'.',,¡ '!;-"'¡;"'H-¡--¡f--:-j,,~ il---+-" : . . [\\\e'\:=~ °, ðe:~,' i,lOT,(v,e, Jo;. I~,...::i';:~,+--.,.','~W"-,'",~.'\,*"",O,Qk"".", ¡j C-C>iJ\;U:;;'O.tiJ..OE-.'",""-""\,,diS J "-i I ~"~- .- - r---'----------r--~-----T -~: --;..j---: r--- ,- -, j ;--'-'/ =-e-C-T\9.J I!~O¡ ~\O¡ ?-~(.>1..\),\:'..,';::..i'-~Ef'-r\S P-P:þ\,..,'{ ro't~t~':'bJW-.I I: : : ',J, :E!<HIBI!, : ¡ PÀGE OF ' , , ; "'---'---1------------------' L I .' . . ( ~ PAC - TECH Enginee"ng, Inc. ~ Engineers / Planners / Surveyors / Environmental Specialists FOR: WQ:)C::)Ç=o~/\~uJ.. ~Çl.IN\~~~J ?Lf:¥< FILE NO- 51b5& TASK NO. \ PAGE "2601 South 35th. Suite 200 . Tacoma, WA 98409-7479 . 473-4491 3640 South Cedar, Suite A . Tacoma. WA 98409-5700 . 473-4491 12720 Gateway Drive. Suite 212 . Seattle. WA 98168-3333 . 243-7112 3721 Kitsap Way, Suite 4 . Bremerton, WA 98312-2461 . 377-2053 PREPARED BY: ú..\J~" CHECKED BY: " ..."-"--"-".~-.. i J .. -.."".-- - .. .J j -¡ -.-., -- . . ~ ,£v-. .J1 - Permeability is mOderateK Loapid in the !;urfaèe layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Roots penetrate easily to the consolidated substra- tum where they tend to mat on the surface. Some roots enter the substratum through cracks 0 Water moves on top of the substratum in winter. Available water capacity is low. Runoff is slow to medium, and the hazard of erosion is moderate. TI1is soil is used for timber, pasture, and row crops, and for urban development. unit IVe-2; woodland group 3dl. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes (AgB) .--This soil is nearly level and undulating. It is similar to Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes, but in places its surface layer is 2 to 3 inches thicker. Areas are irregular in shape and range from 10 acres to slightly more than 600 åcres in size. Some areas are as much as 15 percent included Norma, Bellingham, Tukwila, and Shalcar soils, all of which are poorly drained; and some areas in the vicinity of Enumclaw are as much as 10 percent Buckley soils. Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight. This Alderwood soil is used for timber, pasture, berries, and row crops, and for urban development. Capability unit IVe-2; woodland group 3d2. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes (AgO) .--Depth to the substratum in this soil varies within short distances, but is commonly about 40 inches. Areas are elongated and range from 7 to about 250 acres in size. Soils included with this soil in mapping make up no more than 30 percent of the total acreage. Some areas are up to 25 percent Everett soils that have slopes of 15 to 30 percent, and some areas are up to 2 percent Bellingham, Norma, and Seattle soils, which are in depressions. Some areas, especially on Squak Mountain, in Newcastle Hills, and north of Tiger Mountain, are 25 percent Beausite and Ovall soilso Beausite soils are underlain by sandstone, and Ovall soils by andesite. Runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is severe. The slippage potential is moderate. This Alderwood soil is used mostly for timber. Some areas on the lower parts of slopes are used for pastureo Capability unit VIe-2; woodland group 3d!. Alderwood and Kitsap soils, very steep (AkF) .-- This mapping unit is about SO percent Alderwood gravelly sandy loam and 25 percent Kitsap silt loam. Slopes are 25 to 70 percent. Distri~ution of the soils varies greatly within short distances. About 15 percent of some mapped areas is an included, unnamed, very deep, moderately coarse textured soil; and about 10 percent of some areas is a very deep, coarse-textured Indianola soil. Drainage and permeability vary. Runoff is rapid to very rapid, and the erosion hazard is severe to very severe. The slippage potential is severe. These soils are used for timber. Capability unit VIle-I; woodland group 2dl. berries, Capabi Ii ~y 10 ( Arents, Alderwood Material Arents, Alderwood material consists of Alderwood soils that have been so disturbed through urban- ization that they no longer can be classified with the Al?e:wood series. These soils, however, have many SImIlar features. The upper part of the soil to a depth of 20 to 40 inches, is brown to dark- ' brown gravelly sandy loam. Below this is a grayish- brown, consolidated and impervious substratum. Slopes generally ra~ge from 0 to 15 percent. These soils are used for urban development. Arents, Alderwood material, 0 to 6 percent slopes (AmB).--In many areas this soil is level, as a result of shaping during construction for urban facilities. Areas are rectangular in shape and range from 5 acres to about 400 acres in size. Representative profile of Arents, Alderwood material, 0 to 6 percent slopes, in an urban area, 1,300 feet west and 350 feet south of the northeast corner of sec. 23, T. 25 N., Ro 5 E.:' 0 to 26 inches, dark-brown (lOYR 4/3) gravelly sandy loam, pale brown (lOYR 6/3) dry; massive; slightly hard, very friable, non- sticky, nonplastic; many roots; medium acid; abrupt, smooth boundary. 23 to 29 inches thick 0 26 to 60 inches, grayish-brown (2.5Y 5/2) weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated glacial till, light brownish gray (2.5Y 6/2) dry; common, medium, prominent mottles of yellowish brown (lOYR 5/6) moist; massive; no roots; medium acid. ~!any feet thicko The upper, very friable part of the soil extends to a depth of 20 to 40 inches and ranges from dark grayish brown to dark yellowish brown. Some areas are up to 30 percent included soils that are similar to this soil material, but either shallower or deeper over the compact substratum; and some areas are 5 to 10 percent very gravelly Everett soils and sandy Indianola soils. This Arents, Alderwood soil is moderately well drained. Permeability in the upper, disturbed soil material is moderately rapid to moderately slow, depending on its compaction during construction. The substratum is very slowly permeable. Roots penetrate to and tend to mat on the surface of the consolidated substratum. Some roots enter the substratum through cracks 0 \~ater moves on top of the subs t ra tum in win teL Avai 1 ab Ie water capaci ty is low. Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil is used for urban development. Ca- pability unit IVe-2; woodland group 3d2. Arents, Alderwood material, 6 to IS percent slopes (AmC). - - Thi s so i 1 has convex slopes. Areas are rectangular in shape and range from 10 acres to about 450 acres in size. EXHIBIT ¡:;. .. PAGE$-ôF]I ( LOWER PUGET SOUND BASIN (South Section) Basin Boundary Subcatchment Boundary Collection Point Stream Tributary Number Proposed Project @ - 0386 83310 ~G N + JulY, 1987 utl° SO Gf.1"~ I'u:;:& / (': ; (I i hAL___~L- 1// P" . , \_~-~--- " / ......~ ~ , ,-'-1', .-.. , . . < ~. " ',' '.... I.,L,' ,.' -. ", " .' '..; --:'." ." '.. .; ;. , . " ,i. . ,:;;; . , . Aub -" . , .- "".,.....,... .. , , , ,-,--..,-----.,.- _.... Project Number 3305" 3306* 3307* (Wetland 3302) ~ 3309 urn þ;tX G)""1'" m...a. .,... ~ 3310 Collect. Point 12 17 19 4 15 P:LP5.APA/mlm /'::-~. C ' ~ ;;; "------ Project Description '" Improve channel at 293rd 51. and 4th Ave. (ap". 200'). Project should be justified by a basin plan. Construct regional detention pond. Project should be justified by a basin plan. Construct berm and proportional weir at outlet to Wetland 3302. Project should be justified by a basin plan. Wetland rated #2. Biological assessment needed to a;>sure project does not decrease habitat value, Improve 1,000' of channel in Trib. 0389, RM .19-.39. Project is independently justifiable. Install control stmcture where Trib. 0385 crosses 5W Dash Point Rd. Considerable live stornge could be , gained at this location. Project . should be justified by future basin plan. ' d" A-2 0:""',,\ , "I Problem Addressed Estimated Costs and Comments Mitigates potential flooding in area. $22,000 Mitigates increased upstream peak flows. Protects sensitive channel downstream from erosion. $482,000 ,"'" Mitigates increased upstream peak flows, Provides erosion protection for Trib, 0381, which passes through Saltwater State Park downstream. $614,000 (dependent on land acquisition costs) Eliminates instream erosion and bank instability caused by increased peak flows from urbanization. $189,000 Mitigate increased peak flows upstream; protect unstable channel downstream from erosion. ~ $151,000 :'-~ J Trib. & CofIec!. Existing Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proi. Conditions and Problems 53 0388 8 Geology Erosion of channel banks RM .90-1.00 in fifIed valley. --.... 5 4 0389 4 Hydrology 3309 New development has RM .19-.37 increased tributary flòws, resulting in severe channel incision, channel erosion, and bank instability. Gabion dams have been placed upstream to attenuate flows. 55 0389 4 Geology Incision of swale in Olympic .20-.9Q View Park due to increase in surface runoff. Erosion of sand and gravel. 56 0391 6 Geology Recent rotational landslide (coast) on bluff. 57 0391 6 Geology Incision of alluvium at confluence of tributary and stream; probably due to increased runoff from development on plateau. ~m G')X m:t .~~ 0, P:LPS.APC/mlm ."... C-ll Anticipated Conditions and Problems Outflow below S 320th will continue to cause channel erosion. Channel will continue to erode, possibly threatening homes on bank tops. Eroded material will be deposited downstream at golf course. Downcutting will migrate upstream, damaging park and possibly initiating slope failures that threaten adjacent properties. Continued failure along bluffs. Sedimentation in main stem will continue. Recommendations Improve control of stream flows through use of RID upstream. - Im'prove 1,000' of incised, channel. - Excavate channel sides baëk to more stable slope. - Remove undercut trees, - Place rock in channel beq. .~ - Assess need for structural solutions (e.g., check dams). - Direct ~me runoff away from stream reach or provide more R/D upstream. Problem occurs in Dash Point State Park. No action required. Notify appropriate agencies in Pierce County (where problem originates). .~ Page 1 CErf: FICA T PART A '0 BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT PROJECT ADDRESS: 33)(>( ~W. ~4q~ ~\ APPLICATION NUMBER:' SUBDIVISION/PROJECT NAME:P<"O~p~ u1~Y"ð). ~~\m.:""'cU"r- PARCEL: 242103-<:,1 \ 0'5 Proposed water usage: ì (# connections) . Customer Type:(circle one) Rural Residential (Reside~ Multifar:nily Commercial Industrial I, !he undersigned, or my appointed representative have requested the following purveyor to certify willingness and ability to provide the indicated service. I have read and understand the information provided by the water purveyor on this certificate, and acknowl~dge that the proposed project may require improvements to the water system which would i.ncur my financial obligationo Prior to final approval for construction of the water facilities, it is understood that a legal contrcct between myself and the water utility which specifies the term of water service, operational responsibilities. and financial obligation may be r~quiredo . PRINT NAME: 6.Rt>.~\J~LL£ ~iJ . ? þ.C. - \' ~ E ..x.... \ ~ e:c; e. 1\ ~ 6- ADDRESS: '2.(00 \ ~c 3s-n+ tr\. TCIC.lh-\A- . CITY:JÞi:DKA- STATE: ~ f\-- (Please ensure that the above is completed PRIOR to submittal to the Water Purveyor.) SIGNATURE ~~ '¡): ~~ ZIP"eA<J~ °ART B .'0 BE COMPLETED BY WATER PURVEYOR Water System To Provide Service CITY OF TACOMA State 10# 86800N. The proposed development is/ ~t within cur approved water service area. (circle one) This water utility wilV ~ be providing service. (circle one) Approved number of connections: N/A. Existing source capacity 132 MGD. . Number of Current/existing users: N/A~ Existing Storage: 323 MG. Water service will be provided by: Direct Connection to approved, exi~ting water main. EXHIBIT G, PAGE-I-°F -2£. Extension of existing water mains. V New water system in accordance with WAC 246-290 and Pierce . County Ordinances 86-117S3 and 92-99. . Are water system facilities approved in accordance to DOH requirements? YES. Water service will be made available to this project by (date): N/A. The date that water service is made available is determined after the customer meets the requirements for service as indicated by the Water Division. in accordance with ':;ity Code 12.10. and uoon reçeipt of aDpli~ble permits. . . This certificate is valid for a period of ONE YEAR from the date of issue solely for the specific property/project Indicated. Changes in the number of lots and/or use will require re-application by the applicant, evaluation by the department and issuance of a new certificate. . - -,---- --- ,..,.-,.-" II 0 C"r'I Page 2 " ~tFIGATE OF WA"ŒR AVALLPf.~ PROJECT ADDRESS: ..3~Z 9 ~.úS'. \.34-4--13 Sr. APPLICATION NUMBER: Sl;BDIVISION/PROJECT NAME:Q.ofb~ WooJ..~Y"'c&. ~.1,:..n.\~~- PARCEL: 2.4Z\ö3-~\aS . ~-t. \ FIRE FLOW INFORMA nON: , FOR ALL PROJECTS - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAl. I' -,-",.",~ WATER MAINS: - Location of nearest main capable of supplying at least 500 GPM. .....-s~ ~4(Q~ 'Pl. -If not in street at front of property, distance from property...t?,,~~..?~e.~a~~ .i~:. .. ...t-.J A ,feel.... ..".....' . " . . , , ' HYDRANTS: - Distance} from center line of property frontage to nearest hydrant measured along routes of fire ëpparatus travel is: N A. feet. . THE AMOUNT OF AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW INDICATED ABOVE IS IN ADDITION TO REQUIREMENTS FOR NORMAL DOMESTIC MAXIMUM USE. . A WATER SYSTEM VICINITY MAP WHICH SHOWS THE WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS SERVING ïHIS PROJECT IS REQUIRED FOR OTHER THAN ONE OR TWO FAMILY DWELLINGSo . A contract tr¡¡:sl has not been signed with the appliçant for water service. (circle one) The above information is an accurate account of the existing or necessary water system facilities. This certificate is valid for a period of ONE YEAR from the date of issue solely for the specific property/project indicated. Changes in the number of lots and/or use will require fe-application by the applicant, evaluation by the department and issuance of a new certificate. . THE ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE IS DEPENDENT ON PIERCE COUNTY'S WILLINGNESS TO PERMIT THE INSTALLATION. WHICH MAY INCLUDE CUTTING THE DRIVING SURFACE OF THE STREET. ,FOR PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT OR SUBDIVISIONS: We understand that this document, in absence of a legal contract, constitutes a certification of willingness ëndability to provide water service subject to the conditions noted. Water service will be provided in accordance with Washington Administrative Code 246-290, RCW 90.44 (Water Rights Permits), Pierce County Ordinances 86-117S3 ënd 92-99, T~coma City Code, Chapter 12.10 and an approved water system comprehe.nsive plan. WATERPURVEYOR: CITY OF TACOMA. T.P.U.. WATER DIVISION .DATE:.3-ß -~ SIGNATURE: ~..:.~ ~ . TITLE: S? ~ ~~ FOR ElliA!. SHORT PLAT, SUBDIVISION. BUILDING PERMIT,SEPTIC DESIGN: We the undersigned water purveyor, certify that we will assume full operational and maintenance responsibility for the above water system which has been designed, approved. and installed in accordance with Washington Administrative Code 246-290, RCW 90.44 (Water Rights Permits), Pierce County Ordinances 86-117S3 and 92-99, Tacoma City Cod apter 12.10 and an approved water system comprehensive plan. EXHIBIT WATER PURVEYOR: CITY OF TACOMA,T;P.U.. WÀTER DIVISION. DATE:~ -\8 -~PAGE~OF' SIGNATURE: ~ f~ TITLE: .þ~ ~~ \ ~~ThïsTccrtifiëJt c TproV:iJO5't1 10 _..""",""""- t:~-D-ì:im¡y!íi/l: of fe,i!!lIl a!jú.'{~~~.¡~ to' DCPill,IIWI¡t of Devefopme/lt mid ~'EñViiõi¡¡;iÍJìi':"'I/ Su,yièus~iviit/(1~~, : "'.~..---r'...-~ "" """".,~",",. r{~If.!!£g}jJJjE!.J.~JÇ.Ç()SSéJry /0 ovafu.;¡to ,,~!;!c:vl!!()'mwl/,: /HOPOSills. ¡ ." """,. . t.~~; .r;;~g~.;-" " 1'" ~ '~\'i ",.:. ":", " ;"".:~,~~:",..~,,~, . """ ,~, ' .If '~xi~ij'õf.- wii"lc- i'1I-lìiïs'-iJüx '~.¡~.:.,: 51' r,~.~;,<.;~. :.-: ,,/ t, ~;, ," ..,o._~.,,:~...~... ov. '. . . - . e Ki"" C,"al, (*) Dc,;.'!IIIWlIloIDI!vclopmCIII , \ ~. ",mllllvlroIlIllCIII;¡1 ~I!rvicl!:¡ '""", ¡:¡Ij;)Ool;¡!i:h'l'i.lI:o~uU::II!;I!;1 -: . i~: Bn::'1V"'!. ""'a~.hill~:\)n !Hm;Hj.I.HìJ "", -. P.~,i) ;'!;" ChI::! . ',:' . ,,- ï ,,": . r ()'" .. "j"I\'\' -,-~ KING COmiTY CEHiIFICi,ïï: l)¡;'~;!};:::.::-;;.7\!ll',:~li,iiY ..---.. ""'--------1 nllmc ;t>. .,.">"..' ',;~.,.;o, Bf,J:!-J,.dlng .permit ..,-;(Q;;§Þå#:~.~d1vision Œr Preliminar!! plat or PUD 1]- Rezona or other -{? '7 0/ WA y AÞPfl-ðx. if necessary) . . II~: ~~ 5 ~ Fe.-hE-I<A L &:.le 1. description I I . I c.AI'! . ~be provided by side soyer connection only to (1;" sizo sower Irbj.q.e¿Pí To Hat. frnm tho ¡¡ita system has the capacity to serve the proposed use. 'Sewer service will require An impr~voment to the sewer system of: 5' 1$ ,C ~-a<'-;;;;;:<G="::-:"';;coJ:',~;~""';~:"':"":~~ ro õ.?; .cQ)- ""O~ C:OQ) 0(0'0 ZQ)Q) ~.DLL ~=õ CJ)~>- Q) .... ~ Q)-- a.-O (1)CUQ) ....0 :¡::.c 0-- .... c:~.... CJ)(1)O (1)0 >- ~èë E== Õ .D O~O .'- OJ ::JCUC: . >.- -' <Cx:: . ' c . I ." . -- .-.- feet of sewer trunk or l~ttQral to roach the sitc1 " .:.i '.", :.,),.":', ,'Œs1~;t~~~ se~~r sYlitem improvement is in conformilI\ce with~ County approved sewer ~';;-';""J:".c:o:¡¡prehe~sive' plAn.-' . ' : . R:.r,),':j'.¿",-...,"" ".:'" b~[@f;~'-,TÏi'e, ;o'W'e.r .Y."'to~ i~~rovement, will req\1ire ai>.sewer co,mprehensiva ";;~:.t.-~.,{;:pian': amendment. :" .." ,,~ ;?~""~c.::'!.,::.", ," {. ~..,.. t".:..'vi" ~:r.h~' p~~poBed, l'rojec~ is wit~in the corporatèl.Lmits of the district, !~~*'~""',\>,.~,¿,~.o,r has been' granted. Boundary Review Board approval for extension .:~f..'(fft~J'::.~ "~"",-;, ¡,'of service outuide the district or city. . i'í':>'"""""'OR"'" ' . , ~~t;;}:b. [] Annexation or DaD approval will bo nacesGary to provide service. ~¡:Z¿s~r;lco is subject to the following I ~~"'!""'."':::': . a. Connection chargc: To 8£ CÆ..ci.Jr AIF-A "f< ';;"'.' b. Easement(s) I , 'f;'"~i,"!i.,':". ~. ~ther': ~ LDT WILL R~()I&ç.. #- SE..PA,R..A.TE. .sIDE- .sEttlER. PEKJ..Irr. . L: }{.J~trict. at.~ts ~e. tJ.Oll.! ~ n.gh to dela..Y 9r.d~y sewer ~e ' .. }: 'ii;¡:JW"fc=:¡ t =":~b:V::=: ::=:=:ti~~":':~c. TlLtsEXH 18 IT r~rr:'.f:~~"~O~ s~" beyoUd for one year from dote of sigomre. . PAGE-I-°F -t- ","~:': ~,a~~haven Utility District I.!//I!Y ¡::.. C$5IETTtC- . ",:",'. . ^qency Name Siqnatory Namc ' r:~~W5(-i>F~I'Ì~ OF! ECIIf.IrCÆl..-/&UI'f'OI?r S~v~ fN$;i,~,'- . T i tl Q ~ ::':~jf:"'Fl7.9 :,'-':;'r.:'- ",> ---'"-""-- " the construction of a collection system on the sitcl and/or (describe) ; '<.....' \ . .0. ( ( ..-'" CITY OF r ~ ~- ~~ ~ £:3::J~ ~ ~ ~ 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH (206) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-G210 24 October 1996 Mro Nick Horn, Project Manager Apex Engineering PLLC 2601 South 35th, Suite 200 Tacoma, WA 98409-7479 Subject: Request for Waiver of Requîred Street Width Improvements Granville Place Preliminary Plat: SUB96-0001 3329 SW 344th Street Dear Mr. Horn: The .City is in receipt of your September 24, 1996 letter referencing submittal of required revisions to the Preliminary Plat of Granville Place application. On October 15, 1996 Community Development Services deemed the submittal for application number SUB96-0001 complete for filing. The City has also received your supplemental letter dated September 24, 1996 requesting waiver . of requirements for street width improvem~nts. This request for waiver of City Code requirements is governed by Federal Way City Code Section 22-1477, "Modifications, Defennents and Waivers. " City Code Section 22-1477 allows the Public Works Director to modify, defer or waive the requirements of this code section, only after consideration of a written request, for the following reasons: ~ The improvements as required would not be harmonious' with existing street improvements, would not function properly or safely or would not be advantageous to the neighborhood or City as a whole. ~ Unusual topographic or physical conditions preclude the construction of the improvements as required. ~ Proper vertical or horizontal alignments cannot be determined because the existing streets do not have correct alignments. ~ The required improvement is part of a larger project that has been scheduled for construction in the City's capital improvements program. EXHIBIT Þ PAGE-/--OF Z, ( ( City Findines Following the above criteria, the City can approve the requested street width modifications if requisite revisions to the plans are provided, based upon the following: ~ Access restrictions to the north, south and west are described in the letter of September 24, 19960 Conclusions in the letter are premised upon use of properties to the north and west for future road improvements. With a reconfiguration of the proposed cul-de-sac right-<>f-way to accommodate an 82.5 foot minimum right-of-way diameter, it is possible to build code required cul-de-sac improvements within the first 600 feet of the cul-de-sac on the proposed plat. An acceptable cul-de-sac section would include 80 foot from face of curb to face of curb. The cul-de-sac section must contain concrete curb and gutter on the west and east. The section must also contain a 1.5 foot dedication or easement along the proposed property frontages oflots 5 and 6 for public utilities. This configuration requires adjustment of the cul-de-sac to the east in final plat drawings. .. Unusual topographic and physical conditions which would preclude construction of code required improvements do not exist on the property. Access restrictions exist to the north, south and west of the property. .. Vertical and horizontal alignments can be determined for the proposed roado Existing SW 346th Place has established a vertical and horizontal alignment to the southeast of the proposed project. While vertical and horizontal alignments north to SW 344th Street do not exist, alignments can be reasonably anticipated. The road alignment should incorporate an alignment that anticipates a future extension to SW 344th Street, if the extension is not made at this time. .. The City has not scheduled a capital improvement project within this local street grid. If you would like to schedule a meeting to discuss the project, or if you have any questions, please contact Julie M. Pappa, Engineering Plans Reviewer ll, at (206) 661-4132. SCIJP:jg 1<= Millor, St",c( Syot.cm M-- Grog Bcœck; r"" ManhaI'. Otfioo Galy Bunctt. Sœioc DoYcIopmcot Eaginoo< Lori Micboclooo. ScaIoc I'Iamrt M w, Thamu. ScaIoc PIanocr Julie M. !'.ppc. Eoginccring pw.. ~ IT Robert Woodfa<d Jerry Holm 0. y FiJc Project F-.Jc EXHiBiT L - PAGE~õF32 l:prnuya\docum=ll.ub96 _00.01 \pwl02496.doc ( ( RECEIVED CITY OF FEDERAL WAY APR 2 S 1997 CITY CLE:Ri<S OFFiCE CITY OF FEDf:JU\L WAŸ -_.,-"-----~ c:: (/--- },I !Jr/?' .- > -fiJav.'¡,cI--J- c;lÆ~/¡"'£5 FWHE# 97 - 5 / PA' ~,5> [,. ~~ 1 \, ¡iq ~, tljJLL BE:- K'f'f;"u#Tf:Þ (' ÞJl kfEjltD&P wff '--.,-, rr:: d 10-- J?c,... ,.n"~r:"!"-.!'n' . "':- r:'¡::'" ")!:;CL'jI>9,,,,~..~1¡'" t .<1 'I.'" ¡ h/----"" .......- )}/ LA).. .r",--l.,- ~'7';f.-r-fè/ f . OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER IN THE MATTER OF: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GRANVILLE PLACE PROCESS III I. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION , -------~-----_J--_._--'-';;' - ------- The applicant proposes to subdivide two parcels of land into seven lots, each having a minimum of 7,200 square feet. One of the subject parcels contains an existing single family residence and the other parcel is undeveloped. II. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Hearing Date: Decision Date: April I, 1997 April 21, 1997 At the hearing the following presented testimony and evidence: 1. Lori Michaelson, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way 2. Granville Horn, Apex Engineering 3. Pam Glaser, 3118 SW 346th Place, Federal Way, W A 98023 4. Gary Barnettt, Senior Development Engineer, City of Federal Way At the hearing the following exhibits were admitted as part of the official record of these proceedings: 1. Staff Report with all attachments III. FINDINGS 1. The Hearing Examiner has heard testimony, admitted documentary evidence into the record, and taken this matter under advisement. 2. The Community Development Staff Report sets forth general findings, applicable policies and provisions in this matter and is hereby marked as Exhibit" I" and incorporated in its entirety by this reference. ( ( PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GRANVILLE PLACE April 21, 1997 Page - 2 3. All appropriate notices were delivered in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC). 4. The applicant has a possessory ownership interest in a 2.09 acre, trapezoidal shaped parcel of property located at the terminus of SW 346th Place, south of SW 344th St. within the City of Federal Way. The parcel, bordered on the south by property within Pierce County, is improved with a single family residential dwelling and accessory structure on the northern portion. The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to allow subdivision of the parcel into seven single family residential lots. The preliminary plat shows that access to the site will be provided by extending SW 346th Place through the southern portion of plat. Six lots are proposed for the south portion of the plat and a temporary cul-de-sac is proposed between lots five and six at approximately the center of the parcel. A storm detention tract separates lot six from lot seven which abuts the north property line and is improved with the existing structures which will remain. Lot seven will continue to use the existing access onto SW 344th Street. 5. SW 346th Place presently terminates in a temporary cul-de-sac at the parcel's east property line. The applicant will remove the asphalt from the cul-de-sac portion of the road, return said area to grass, and remove the temporary cul-de-sac easement from the title of the subservient estates. 6. The east property line is bordered by the Southhampton Court subdivision and the south property line is bordered by the Stonegate Division II subdivision located in Pierce County. The north and west property lines are bordered by single family residential dwellings on larger lots. 7. The site is located within the Single Family Residential-High Density designation of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan and is located within the Single Family Residential (RS- 7.2) zone classification of the FWCC. The RS- 7.2 classification authorizes single family detached dwelling units on minimum 7,200 square foot lot sizes. The proposed minimum lot size is 7,200 square feet and the maximum lot size is 10,320 square feet. The proposed lot size and density are consistent with abutting and nearby platted properties within both the City and Pierce County. 8. The storm drainage improvements must comply with all applicable Core and special requirements outlined in the King County Surface Water Design Manual including surface water detention, biofiltration, and oil/water separation. The applicant submitted a Level I downstream analysis which has been reviewed by the City Public Works Department. The storm water system is designed to collect storm water in the detention tract between lots six and seven, and then releasing the water to a biofiltration swale for conveyance to the north to an existing outfall point in SW 344th St. ( PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GRANVILLE PLACE April 21, 1997 Page - 3 9. The soils consist of Alderwood gravelly, sandy loam which is moderately well drained, capable of adequate compaction, and able to support the proposed development. The site is mostly flat with an average slope of three percent. On site vegetation consists of domestic shrubs and grasses, alder, blackberry, and other native species. Four significant trees are on site, all of which will be lost. The applicant must obtain approval of a landscape plan and comply with the significant tree ordinance. No threatened or endangered species are known or excepted to inhabit the site. Replacement of the significant trees and incorporation of street trees, buffering, open space, and landscaping will assist the small birds and animals currently on the site. The project is not located within a sensitive area or 100 year floodplain. 10. The applicant will install full street improvements for the extension of SW 346th Place from the present temporary cul-de-sac to the new temporary cul-de-sac, and half street improvements north of said point. Full street improvements include 28 feet of pavement, vertical curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and street trees within a 56 foot wide right-of-way. The half street improvements will include 20 feet of pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street trees on the easterly side only. The half street improvements will extend from the temporary cul-de-sac to the north property line of lot seven within a 30 foot right-of-way. Lot seven will continue to use the existing access onto SW 344th Street which will also serve as an emergency vehicle access for the plat. 11. The applicant asserts that since SW 346th Place is a neighborhood access street, street lighting is not required by the FWCC. Section 22-1522 FWCC states as follows: Street lighting shall be required on all rights-of-way, except neighborhood access streets and culs-de-sac. Section 20-185 FWCC states as follows: a. All subdivisions and short subdivisions shall install street lighting on all streets, except neighborhood access streets and cul-de-sacs where installation is optional, in accordance with common design standards for spacing, placement, and luminous intensity. b. Light standard and luminar design shall be approved by the Director of Public Works. Section 22-1522 is a portion of the zoning chapter of the FWCC and addresses street lighting on all City streets regardless of whether said streets are located within a subdivision. Section 20-185 is a portion of the subdivision chapter of the FWCC and ( ( PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GRANVILLE PLACE April 21, 1997 Page - 4 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. specifically addresses standards for new subdivisions. Section 20-185 states that it is optional with the City as to whether street lighting is required on neighborhood access streets. Such interpretation is consistent with Section 20-144(C) FWCC which sets forth a portion of the criteria which the Examiner must evaluate in a plat alteration application. Said section states that Section 20-185 applies "only to new roadways proposed as a result of the alteration of the plat." Thus, in all new subdivision streets, street lighting may be required at the discretion of the City. 12. School aged children residing in the subdivision will be served by Green Gables Elementary School, Saghalie Junior High School, and Decatur High School. Bus stops are currently located within a few blocks of the plat and may be adjusted depending on student transportation needs. The plat must comply with the City School Impact Fee Ordinance which is subject to an annual adjustment and update. Alderdale Park is located approximately one half mile to the northeast of the site; Olympic View Park is approximately one mile north ofthe site; and Crescent Heights Park, within the City of Tacoma, is approximately one mile to the west. Dash Point State Park is 1.5 miles to the northwest. Section 20-155(B) FWCC requires the applicant to provide open space in the amount of" 15% of the gross land area of the subdivision site". However, since the site is less than five acres, the applicant is allowed to seek alternative methods to providing said open space on site. The applicant is proposing to pay a fee in lieu of reservation as pennitted by Section 22-155 and as required by a conditional of approval hereinafter. The City of Tacoma has provided a certificate of water availability indicating its ability to supply both domestic water and fire flow to the site. The Lake Haven Utility District will supply sanitary sewer service to all lots. Section 20-l20(B) FWCC requires the Examiner to review a request for preliminary plat approval for compliance with Sections 20-2; 20-151 through 20-157; 20-178 through 20-187 FWCC; and RCW 58.17. The preliminary plat complies with the subdivision design criteria set forth in Section 20-151 FWCC. The traffic is distributed in a logical manner toward a collector street system and connects with existing streets. A temporary cul-de-sac is provided, but is not more than 600 feet in length. The site contains no steep slopes and the streets are designed in confonnance with adopted standards for sight distance at intersections. All lots are designed in accordance with the criteria set forth in Section 20-152 FWCC and are of ample dimension to provide a regular shaped building area which can meet required setbacks. All lots are designed to provide access for emergency apparatus and abut a public street right-of-way. No lots will access onto an arterial street. As previously found the ( ( PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GRANVILLE PLACE April 21, 1997 Page - 5 20. subdivision meets the density and lot size criteria of the RS- 7.2 zone classification. The applicant is not proposing a cluster subdivision, and as previously found, will satisfy the open space requirements of Section 20-155 FWCC by making a payment in lieu of open space. Pedestrian and bicycle access corridors are not appropriate as the site is not located near a bikeway or trail. Sidewalks on both sides of the plat road will ensure safe walking conditions. No view blockage issue are present. 18. The improvement and density requirements set forth in Sections 20-176 and 20-177 FWCC are satisfied. Buffers required by Section 20-178 are not necessary since the site is bordered by single family residential development on all sides. Conditions of approval require the applicant to retain all natural vegetation except that removed for improvements or grading as required by Section 20-179. Street improvements meet the requirement of Section 20-180. 19. The City of Tacoma will serve the subdivision with both domestic water and fire flow as is authorized by Section 20-181 FWCC and the Lake Haven Utility District will provide sanitary sewer service as is authorized by Section 20-182. As previously found, the applicant is proposing an adequate storm drainage system designed in accordance with FWCC requirements as required by Section 20-183. All lots in the subdivision will be served by electricity, telephone, cable tv, and natural gas (if available) and all utilities will be provided underground as required by Section 20-184. As previously found, street lighting will be provided as required by Section 20-185. The applicant is required to provide a landscape plan, comply with the significant tree ordinance, and provide permanent survey control monuments in accordance with Sections 20-186 and 20-187 FWCc. Subdivisions are approved pursuant to the Process III evaluation set forth in Section 22-476 et seq. FWCC. Process III requires the Examiner to issue a recommendation to the Federal Way City Council which then makes the final decision as to approval or disapproval of the preliminary plat application. Findings on each decisional criteria used by the City Council to make its decision are hereby made as follows: A. The proposed preliminary plat is consistent with the Single Family High Density designation of the 1995 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. The plat is developed in accordance with the RS- 7.2 zone classification and is consistent with density allowances and policies applicable to the Single Family High Density designation. B. The proposed preliminary plat must comply with all applicable codes and regulations to include the Environmental Policy, the Subdivision, and the Methods of Mitigation Chapters of the FWCc. Conditions of approval set forth hereinafter ensure that the preliminary plat complies will all applicable codes and regulations. C. The proposed preliminary plat is consistent with and will ensure protection of the ( ( PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GRANVILLE PLACE April 21, 1997 Page - 6 public health, safety, and welfare. IV. CONCLUSIONS From the foregoing findings the Hearing Examiner makes the following conclusions: 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to consider and decide the issues presented by this request. 2. The proposed preliminary plat promotes the health, safety, and general welfare in accordance with standards established by the State and the City, and promotes the effective use of land by preventing the overcrowding or scattering of development. The plat avoids congestion and promotes the safe and convenient travel by the public on City streets. The plat provides for adequate light and air, water, sewage, drainage, parks and recreational areas, schools and school grounds, and other public requirements. The plat makes appropriate provision for proper ingress and egress and provides for housing needs of the community. The plat will ensure unifonn monumenting ofland divisions and conveyance of accurate legal descriptions and contains no environmentally sensitive areas. 3. The proposed preliminary plat makes appropriate provision for the public health, safety, and general welfare for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, water supplies, sanitary waste, fire protection, parks, playgrounds, schools, and safe walking conditions as required by RCW 58.17.110. The proposed preliminary plat will serve the public use and interest by providing an attractive location for a single family residential subdivision and therefore should be approved subject to the following conditions: A. Prior to final plat approVal~ing structure on Lot 7, located within five feet of the proposed south property line, must be removed or relocated to confonn to building setbacks requirements as established by Federal Way City Code (FWCC); or lot lines must be adjusted accordingly. B. Prior to final plat approval the required off-site hydrant must be installed at SW 344th Street at a location approved by King County Fire District #39, or alternative fire protection measures implemented for Lot #7, as approved by the fire district. C. Pursuant to the applicant's proposal to pay a fee in lieu of reserving a portion of on site open space, as provided by the FWCC, a current market value analysis of similarity situated property must be submitted to the City to determine the amount of the open space fee under this agreement. Payment of the open space fee shall be required prior to final plat approval. ( ( PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GRANVILLE PLACE April 21, 1997 Page - 7 H. D. The existing temporary cul-de-sac easement located east of the site at the existing terminus ofSW 346111 Place shall be relinquished and documents filed with the City for recording. The applicant is responsible to prepare and submit the necessary documents in a form approved by the City. The applicant shall reconstruct the cul- de-sac area to match the existing improvements. Design and construction of this street section shall conform to Public Works standards and shall include sidewalks and street trees within the planter strip, as approved by the City. E. Design and location of the temporary barricade adjacent to Lot 7 shall be approved by the City of Federal Way and King County Fire District 39. This temporary barricade shall be removed with future right-of-way improvements, as required and approved by the City. F. The proposed temporary cul-de-sac easement located in Lots 5 and 6 shall be relinquished with future right-of-way improvements at this location, and the area reconstructed, as required and approved by the City. G. 7 -if, Retention/detention facilities used to control runoff from the site fUÍd off-site drainage courses shall be located in a detention tract dedicated to the City at the time of final plat approval, unless located within improved public rights-of-way. I. The final plat drawing must establish the open space buffer in an open space tract to be owned in common and maintained by property owners of the proposed subdivision, and prohibiting removal or disturbance of landscaping within the tract, except as necessary for maintenance or replacement of existing plantings and as approved by the City. The open space buffer shall be landscaped to achieve and maintain a visual buffer pursuant to FWCC Chapter 20-155 and Sec. 22-1565( c)( 1), as approved by the City and pursuant to Condition fh below. ~ Prior to issuance of construction permits a landscape plan, prepared by a licensed landscape architect, shall be submitted to the City for approval, and shall include the following elements: (a) Open space buffer landscaping; (b) Street trees in planter strips inside plat boundaries and off-site as required by Condition #4, above; (c) Significant tree replacement plan; and (d) Visual screening of all property boundaries of the detention tract from ( PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GRANVILLE PLACE April 21, 1997 Page - 8 adjacent properties and the right-of-way with landscaping and/or fencing. J. Prior to final plat approval, all required improvements must be completed or the improvements appropriately bonded, per City Code requirements. Design and construction of plat improvements shall conform to Federal Way City Code, the King County Surface Water Design Manual, the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan, and all other applicable codes and regulations. RECOMMENDA TION: It is hereby recommended to the Federal Way City Council that the preliminary plat of Granville Place be approved subject to the conditions contained in the conclusions above. ~ DATED THIS )/ DAYOF~p ~ L s5~~ K. CA USSEA UX, JR. - ' Hearing Examiner ::l r}"\c}'\ TRANSMITTED THIS ~ DAY OF April, 1997, to the following: APPLICANTS: Bob Woodford and Jerry Holm 25105 9th Avenue S Des Moines, W A 98198 OWNERS: Gene F. Sims 1742931 5t Drive NW Arlington, W A 98223 James McCulloch 3327 SW 344th Street Federal Way, WA 98023 AGENT: Granville Horn APEX Engineering 2401 South 35th Street Tacoma, W A 98409 ( ( PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GRANVILLE PLACE April 21, 1997 Page - 9 Pam Glaser 3118 SW 349th Place Federal Way, W A 98023 Debbie Kovach 3126 SW 346th Place Federal Way, W A 98023 Al Dimakis 3110 SW 3461h Place Federal Way, W A 98023 City of Federal Way Attn: Bob Baker/Lori Michaelson 33530 1 sl Way South Federal Way, W A 98003 ( ( RIGHTS TO RECONSIDERATION AND CHALLENGE THE BELOW STATED RIGHTS TO RECONSIDERATION AND APPEAL AND DESIGNED TO PROVIDE NOTICE OF TIME LIMITS AND A GENERAL OUTLINE OF PROCEDURES. THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION ARE FOUND IN SECTION 22-488 OF THE FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE 0 THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR CHALLENGES TO THE HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION ARE FOUND IN SECTION 22-489 OF THE FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE. CLARIFICATION OF THE RIGHTS TO RECONSIDERATION AND CHALLENGE AND THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PERSONS WHO HAVE A RIGHT TO CHALLENGE MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 0 RECONSIDERATION Any person who has a right to challenge a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner under the Federal Way City Code may request the Hearing Examiner to reconsider any aspect of his or her recommendation by delivering a written request for reconsideration to the Department of Community Development within seven (7 ) calendar days after the date of issuance of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation. The person requesting the reconsideration shall specify in the request what aspect of the recommendation he or she wishes to have reconsidered and the reason for the request. The person requesting the reconsideration shall within seven (7) calendar days following issuance of the recommendation, mail or personally deliver a copy of the request for reconsideration along with a notice of the right to file a written response to the ( ( request to those persons who have a right to challenge under Federal Way City Code. Proof of such mailing or personal delivery shall be made by an affidavit attached to the request for reconsideration at the time of delivering the request to the Department of Community Development 0 The notice shall state that such response must be received by the Department of Community Development within seven (7) calendar days following the filing of the request with the department. Any person filing a response to a response to the reconsideration request must distribute that response by mail or personal delivery to those persons having a right to challenge under the Federal Way City Code. Proof of such distribution by mail or personal delivery shall be made by affidavit attached to the response delivered to the Department of Community Development 0 Within ten (10) working days after expiration of the reconsideration period, the Hearing Examiner shall notify the persons who have a right to challenge under the Federal Way Zoning Code, whether or not the recommendation will be reconsidered. The Hearing Examiner may reconsider the recommendation only if he or she concludes that there is substantial merit in the request. The process of reconsideration will be in accordance with Section 22- 488 of the Federal Way City Code 0 CHALLENGE The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner may be challenged by any person who lS to receive a copy of that recommendation. The challenge, in the form of a letter of challenge, must be delivered ( ( to the Department of Community Development within fourteen (14) calendar days after the issuance of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation or, if a request for reconsideration is filed, then within fourteen (14) calendar days of either the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner denying the request for reconsideration or the reconsidered recommendation. The letter of challenge must contain a clear reference to th~ matter being challenged and a statement of the specific factual findings and conclusions of the Hearing Examiner disputed by the person filing the challenge. The person filing the challenge shall include, with the letter of challenge, the fee established by the City. The challenge will not be accepted unless it is accompanied by the required fee. The person challenging the recommendation shall within said fourteen (14) calendar day period mail or personally deliver a copy of the letter of challenge along with a notice of the right to file a written response to the challenge to those persons who have the right to file a challenge under Section 22-489 of the Federal Way City Code. The notice shall state that such response must be received by the Department of Community Development within five (5) working days following the filing of the written challenge with the department. Any person filing a response to the reconsideration request must distribute that response by mail or personal delivery to those persons having a right to challenge under Section 22-489 of the Federal Way City Code. Proof of such distribution by mail or ( ( personal delivery shall be made by affidavit attached to the response delivered to the Department of Community Development 0 The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner may be challenged whether or not there was a request to reconsider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation. Any challenge of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation will be heard by the Federal Way City Council. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM DATE: April 30, 1997 FROM: Land Use/Transportation Committee Phil Watkins, Chair Mary Gates Ron Gintz ~reg Moore, Director of Com~~rity Development Services Jim Harris, Associate Planne~ TO: SUBJECT: Cellular Towers At the direction of City Manager Ken Nyberg, information on cellular towers is being brought to your attention. At this time there is no recommendation from staff. Staff will be prepared to follow through on committee direction, if any. Enclosed (Exhibit A) is the current work program status of the code amendments for your information. Status There are four existing cellular towers located in Federal Way. They are located primarily along the corridor between 1-5 and Pacific Highway South. General locations include Belmore Park, the fire station on First Avenue, Jet Chevrolet and Federal Way High School. There are five cellular tower applications pending with the City. Most are located in the 1- 5/Pacific Highway South corridor. General locations include Jet Chevrolet, the Bulk Mail Center on 9th South, the fire station on 21 st Avenue SW, South 288th Street/Pacific Highway South and Truman High School. A map noting these sites will be provided at your meeting. Land Use Process In December of 1996 an interpretation was made which clarified what processes are needed to be followed to obtain permits for Telecommunications Facilities. A copy (Exhibit B) is attached, dated December 11, 1996. Since adoption of the 1724 Regulatory Reform code amendments the process for cell towers in commercial and residential zones is attached on the two page table (Exhibit C) entitled Cellular Tower and dated April 24, 1997. Please note that the five current cell tower applications require a public hearing process under the former code requirement because they are vested under those processes. Cell Tower Guidelines Guidance for cell tower height in the zoning code is found under 1) special notes and regulations on the permitted land use chart and 2) if a height variance is required then the variance criteria apply. Comprehensive Plan Policies related to telecommunications include: PUP4 PUP6 PUP17 PUP19 The City encourages the joint use of trenches, conduits, or poles, so that utilities may coordinate expansion, maintenance, and upgrading facilities with the lease amount of right-of-way disruption. The City will endeavor to inform utilities of upcoming improvements or expansions which may provide opportunities for joint use. The City should require that site-specific utility facilities such as antennae and sub-stations are reasonably and appropriately sited and screened to mitigate adverse aesthetic impacts. The City should modify the zoning regulations to address the siting, screening, and design standards for wireless/cellular facilities, substations, and antennae facilities in such a manner as to allow for reasonable and predictable review while minimizing potential land use and visual impacts on adjacent property. Other jurisdictions have adopted cellular tower code amendments. They typically cover: siting criteria, development standards, co-locations, definitions, etc. Attached are three Puget Sound area examples: Redmond, Edmonds and Lynwood (Exhibits 0, E, and F). Other Related Issues Regional Cooperation. City of Kent Councilmember Tim Clark has proposed working with adjacent jurisdictions on telecommunications issues. Staff has been attending and monitoring meetings. Attached is the letter dated February 28, 1997, from Tim Clark (Exhibit G) with a proposed resolution on cooperation between jurisdictions siting cellular towers, that he has asked other jurisdictions to consider. (Please note that the Kent City Council has not approved this resolution.) 1. 20 Master Ordinance for Right-of-Way. A master ordinance is being drafted that covers telecommunications facilities in the ROW. Bonnie Lindstrom is the chair of a committee looking at this issue and is in the process of preparing a first draft. 3. Master Lease Agreement. Iwen Wang, Management Services Director, is working on a master lease agreement for providers who may want to locate on City property. ., 1 Projected Timelines for Code Admendments Negotiate Draft SEPA Plmming LUTC Contract Report Complete Commission 1724 N/A Complete . Complete Complete Complete Downtown Parking Complete Complete N/A Complete May Essential Public Facilities Complete Complete Complete Complete April Subdivision Code Complete Complete 5/30 Complete June Non-Conforming Complete + In.:house Complete 5/15 4/16 - 5/7 June Sensitive Areas Complete Complete 6/11 6/18 - 7/2 July ..fordable Housing Complete July September August September Residential Design Pending August October Sept/Oct November Comprehensive Plan Update In-house July August 9/3 - 9/17 October Shoreline Complete 5/19-23 July July August Wellhead Protection Pending September November 11/5 ' December Enchanted Parkway and Weyerhaeuser Annexations are largely dependent on applicants and will be scheduled when ready. Regional Goverenance is dependent on Suburban Cities Association Committee work. CODEADMN.CHT 'EXHi8;T -A PACS l or~__- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To: From: Re: Date: CDS Staff, Interpretation Notebook Greg Moore, Director ~ Communication Facilities Code Interpretation December 11, 1996 Recent passage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 along with questions from the wireless communication industry has prompted the need for the city to identify what is to be the appropriate land use process and code requirements for siting of wireless communication facilities. Typical with most other jurisdictions the city code does not contemplate a number of issues concerning the siting of these types of facilities. The purpose of this memo therefore is to provide an interpretation and thus a clarification as to how the city will handle requests for siting of wireless communication facilities 1 on existing buildings, cellular towers, or other types of structures such as water towers in commercial or residential zones. This interpretation does not require permits for direct broadcast satellites (satellite dishes in single family zones intended for individual home use). Familiar to most people are the large communication towers which, over the past several years, have begun to dot the landscape. The city has permitted several of these large towers. The land use process for doing so is relatively straight forward: follow the land use process outlined in the use zone chart for public utilities, process height variance for increased height (residential zones) and comply with the procedural requirements of SEPA. As cellular technology continues to evolve, the need for these types of towers has lessened (at least in more urban areas) and the industry preference now is to locate antennas, transmitters or transceivers, on an existing building or structure. It is this type of request that has caused some confusion as to what is the appropriate land use review process, development standards and building permit process. The Reliance building located on S. 320th, adjacent to Interstate 5 provides an example of how the FWCC is to be interpreted for building mount antennas. As illustrated in Figure 1 public utilities in the City Center zone are subject to site plan review and a height limit of 35 feet. Adherence to this height limit would make the addition of antennas to either an existing building or structure nonsensical for the service provider from a technical standpoint and it would also make a relatively simple request too involved because of the need to justify additional height under a higher land use review process. A more logical approach then, is to use the height limit of the principle structure or building coupled with the land use process stipulated for public utilities. In addition to the maximum height limit of building or structure, antennas. and associated equipment cabinets may be located on the top of buildings or structures so long as they do not exceed four feet in height in accordance with City Code section 22-1047(2)(a,b). Under this code section those proposals which exceed the four foot limit can be considered subject to administrative review by the director of community development services. Equipment cabinets must also meet the screening requirements set forth in this code 1 Wireless communication facilities, also referred to as "personal wireless service facilities" are defined using federal definitions. "Micro ceIl" is defined as a wireless communications facility consisting of an antenna that is either (i) four feet in height and with an area of not more than 580 square inches, or (ii) if a tubular antenna, no more than four inches in diameter and no more than six feet in length. EX H ~ 8 ~T ---=v PAGE~ OF~_4 CDS Staff Page 2 December 11, 1996 E.'.'\.~.I'~'..?"'.""...'~ .-- , ' ~"" . . ~ d......d ¡ b .OF~ -.. PAGE ~ section. For structures which are nonconforming as to height, antennas could be placed on the structure so long as they do not increase the degree of nonconformance (Le., they do not project higher than the building or structure), as may be the case with the BPA transmission line towers. This approach should hopefully encourage the addition of wireless antennas onto existing structures, thereby reducing the need to erecting large unsightly communication towers. IQ ure - ommercla onmg IS nc s LAND USE LAND USE HEIGHT LIMIT SEPA REQUIRED REVIEW PROCESS PUBLIC SITE PLAN 35 FEET VARIES UTILITY REVIEW CELLULAR SITE PLAN HEIGHT MAY EXCEED 35 FEET YES, IF GREATER THAN 60 FEET IN TOWER (PUBLIC REVIEW IF APPROVED THRU PROCESS HEIGHT UTILITY) I I STRUCTURE M:!\:O~ SI 11: '\t! C'.','::í) H!':13i iT 0;: NO I MOUNT PLi\N RCVIEW Pi~IN::I::,"\:... SH~lJCl UHE:: PLUS 4 I ANTI-.NNA FE!.:.I. STHlJCTLJi~ES OVER 4 (PUBLIC UTILITY) FEE 5100 iT-" I f~;:Q"JIHïS DIRECTOR'S ! M)M¡~IS ¡ IF\TlVE ,A.~PROV/\L ...n__.1 . -- F' 1 c . IZ O' t' t In the case of the Reliance building an applicant would make application for minor site plan review and would also take out a building penn it, if required (see attached interpretation from city's building official), for the actual installation of the facility. Figure 1 is shaded to reflect this approach. The purpose of the minor site plan review process is to reflect the need for a lesser review process. Staff will work on further defining minor site plan review procedures as well as developing a specific set of submittal requirements. Igure - esl entia onmg Olstncts LAND USE LAND USE REVIEW HEIGHT LIMIT SEPA PROCESS PUBLIC UTILITY PROCESS 1112 35 FEET YES3 CELLULAR TOWER PROCESS III PROCESS II HEIGHT YES (PUBLIC UTILITY) VARIANCE < 35 FEET. STRUCTURE MOUNT PROCESS III HEIGHT OF PRINCIPAL YES ANTENNA (PUBLIC UTILITY) STRUCTURE F' 2 R 'd . IZ 2 Process III is proposed ta be changed ta the equivalent of process I under the proposed 1724 code amendments dw-ing the fIrst quarter of 1997. 3 Pursuant ta ESHB 2828 SErA is required if: (I) micocell is ta be attached ta a residence or a schaal; (2) ather antenna ta be attached ta a residence or school or is located in a residential zone; (3) cellular tower in a residential zone; ar (4) any type of project located in an environmentally sensitive area. \ \ \ CDS Staff Page 3 December 11, 1996 EXH~B;T b PAG~ 3 . OF_JJ .... '" For residential zones the process as outlined in Figure 2 above is more complex since SEPA will be required for almost all projects. FWCC stipulates land use review process III, however, this is proposed to change to new land use process III, which is similar to existing process I. Therefore, if the new code amendments are adopted there will be no review by the hearing examiner or city council, but there will be an opportunity for public comment. In the case where the city enters into a franchise agreement to allow for the placement of wireless facilities on existing structures such as telephone poles, the city will review a master plan which illustrates and discusses the proposal. Master plan review and approval may eliminate the need for separate review of each telecommunication facility. A determination of permits needed for placement of facilities will be made at the time of the administrative review and approval of the master plan. ( DT: TO: FM: SB: E )( H ~ 8 ~ T -- B ~-~~~~.-.~.~ PAC.~--=~~.- , OF 4 Building Division Policy November 12, 1996 Building Division Staff Dick Mumma, Building Official ~¡f7 /f' Transmission Tower Exemptions Background: ( Policy: Recent changes to the communications act at the Federal level will cause new competition in the cellular phone business. As a result, we may receive request for new types of electromagnetic wave transmission towers and antenna for cellular phone, two way communications and other users such as wide area networks. The UBC currently provides no exception for these type of transmission devices. Many of these new antenna don't present any special hazard and should be exempted. In an attempt to establish a threshold that may be applied I have established the following policy that may be applied to transmission towers and antenna. Radio transmission towers and antennas may be exempted from a building permit if ALL of the following apply; 1. The tower or antenna's primary supporting mast, not including mounting hardware, must consist of a single member (such as a pole or tube) that's largest cross section dimension no larger than one and one quarter inches (I 1/4"). AND 2. The total overall height of the tower or antenna may not exceed 20 feet, a. Above the line of a roof eave, top edge of a roof mansard or coping of a flat roofwhen attached to a building or structure. OR b. Above the adjacent grade when mounted on the ground. AND 3. The total weight, including mounting hardware when mounted on a building but not including concrete foundations when mounted on the ground, shall not exceed thirty (30) pounds. CELLULAR TOWERS April 25, 1997 LAND USE ZmŒ LA:-m USE REVIEW HEIGHT LIMIT LA:-""D (] SE Appeal orLand Use Dcci~ion SEPAREQUIRED PROCESS NOTIHCATIOS' PROCESS CO\UtERClAL ZONES Public l;tility 1'0 Process II (Site Plan 35 feel None 1(lr Process II Appeal of the Site Plan Review Ye~, if GO feet in (Ccllulm' Tower) (Professional Review/Administrative) (Site Plan Review). Decision goes to Ùle Hearing height or greater, or Ollice) Examiner with a fw1her appeal less than 60 feet in Process IV If over 3S fect, Process IV For Process IV, to Superior Court. height and located (Varianee/llearing (Variance/ I lem'ing Examiner) ~oticc in Paper; man I ~xmnincr) required if over required. Site Posted; environmentally 3S feel. (Rdi:r to FWCC, Libraries and City sensitive area. See 22-61)1) for special I raIl posted; regulations and notes.) Prope:1y owners within 300 feel notilicd. B~ Proces~ II (Site Plan 3S feet ~one Illr Process II Appeal of the Si:e Plan Review (1\eighhorhood Review/Administrative) (Site Plan Review). Decision goes to the I fearing I~usiness) If over 3S !i:el, Process III (ProJect Examiner with a fuI1her apí)eal Approval! Administrative) required. For Process III, to City Council then Superior and Process III (Project r-.;oticc in Paper; CoUl1. Approval! Administrative) Site Posted; L1. m BC (Community œquin.:d if over 35 tèeL Libraries ¿¡nd City :;Þ. - .,. I ~usiness) (Refer to FWCC, Sec 22- I ¡all postcd. G> ,.;<. J.'~ 721) and ïÚ2 1(lr special 111 ,~ regulations and notes -." (1') p<':I1aining to the BN m1d "'" m: districts respectively.) ~- .-1 0 n r i\jJ 1 LA:'\;o U:)E ZO~T,. L^,"D USE REVIEW HEIGl-IT LIMIT LA.:\iD USE Appeal of Land Use Decision SEP A REQUIRED PROCESS NOTIFICATION PROCESS Public Utility CC-C (City Process II (Site Plan 3S teet None 11)r Process II Appeal of the Site Plan Review Yes, if60 feet in (Cdlular Tower) Center Con:) Review/Administrative) (Site Plml Review). Decision goes to the Hewing height or greater, or Examiner with a further appeal less than 60 feet in For Process III, to Superior Court. height and located Process III (Project If over 35 feet, Process III (Project Notice in Paper; man Approval/ Administrative) Approval/ Administrative) required. Sitc Posted; environmentally required if over 35 feet. Libraries mid City sensitive area. (Refer to FWCC, See 22- Hall posted. 801,816 and 834 for special regulations and notes pertaining to the CC- C, CC-F and OP districts respectively.) CC-F (City Center Frame) 01' (Otlice Appeal of the Site Plan Review Park) Decision goes to the Hearing Examiner with a further appeal to City Cowlcil then Superior CoW1. I3P (Business f'roœss II (Site Plan 40 feet Appeal of the Site Plan Review Park) Review/Administrative) Decision goes to the Hearing If over 40 feet, (Process III (Project Examiner with a further appeal \J ,..., Approval! Administrative) required. to Superior Court. . , » '",.' Process III (project G> ",,"f....,. Approval/ Administrative) m ):.: required if over 40 feet. _n', (Refer to FWCC, See 22- rn :w.", '/371 for special regulations :P "" and notes pertaining to tile _.~ BP district.) 0 in ~ :~, 2 I < L\."lJ USE Zœ,.1, L,\."D USE REVIEW I-lEIGm'LIMIT 1..\,'<1) USE App~1l1 of Land Use Decision SEP A REQUIRED PROCESS N(nIFlCATI()~ I'R<XESS IŒSIDENTIAL ZO!\ES SE (Suburban Process III (Project 35 11.'Ct For eiùler Proce::;s Appeal of thc Process III Yes Public l;tility Estate) Approval! Administrative) III or IV Decision goes to the Hearing (Cellular Towcr) (Refer to I'WCC, S~c 22- If over 35 fœt, Process IV I ~xamincr with a further appeal 609 for special regulations (Variance! Hearing Examiner) Public \otice in to City Council thcn Superior nnd notes.) required. (Refer to I'WCC, Sl'C 22- Paper; Site Posll'd: COlU'!. GO9 for special regulations and I .ibraries and City no\l.:s ) I [all posted; RS (Sing:e Process III (Project :HJ feet Property owners within 300 teet Family Approval! Adminisu'ativc) notified. Residential) (Refer to FWCC, See 22- If over 30 feet, Proccss IV 644 for special regulations (Variance! Hem'ing Examiner) and noles.) required. (Refer to FWCC, Sec 22- 644 for special regulations and notes.) RM Process III (Project 30 feet in RM 3.G & RM 2.4 zones. (Multit:-ullily Approval/ Administrutivc) Residential) (Rcfer to FWCC, Sec 22- 35 feet in RM 1.8 zonc. 678 for special regulations and noles.) If over the height limits, Process IV (Variance/I Iem'ing Examiner) required. (Refer to FWCC, Sec 22- 67X for special regulations and notes) --..--. y--.- » oX /~. "1"" I:lDOCir:l.!J.~. (¡J~ 3 Edmonds Community Development Code otential increase or decrease in value to pr erty owners. 20.40.0 Contract rezones. An app~nt may propose c äitions to be imposed by co act on a re ne. If the appli- cant wishes to tak is aR oach, the proposed conditions shall be re 'ewed at all public hear- ings on the rezone. 20.40.030 ~tice. Notice ~,,{ezone hearings (a text change) before the planning board shall b e same as / set foÇ:h for proposed amendments t the com- pr~£nsive plan in ECDC 20.00.020 fo news- lJiPer publication, and pursuant to DC '20.91.010. COrd. 3112 § 14,1996]. r;-dmoNcf > EXHf8~T D P^ ~r: / n7-~-"'q' e 20-63 20.50.010 Chapter 20.50 WIRELESS COMMUNICA TrONS FACILITIES Sections: 20.50.000 20.50.010 20.50.020 20.50.030 20.50.040 20.50.050 20.50.060 20.50.070 20.50.080 20.50.090 Purpose. Development standards for micro facilities. Development standards for mini facilities. Development standards for macro facilities. Development standards for monopole 1. Development standards for monopole IT. Development standards for lattice towers. Additional conditional use pennit criteria for monopole I, monopole II and lattice tower. Exemption. Obsolescence. 20.50.000 Purpose. In addition to the general purposes of the comprehensive plan and the zoning ordinance, this chapter is included in the Community Development Code to provide for a wide range of locations and options for wireless commu- nication providers while minimizing the unsightly characteristics associated with wire- less communication facilities and to encourage creative approaches in locating wireless com- munication facilities which will blend in with the surroundings of such facilities. COrd. 3099 § 1,1996]. 20.50.010 Development standards for micro facilities. A. Micro facilities are pemùtted in all zones. B. A micro facility shall be located on existing buildings, poles or other existing sup- pon structures. A micro facility may locate on buildings and structures; provided, that the (Revised 12/96) 20.50.020 interior wall or ceiling immediately adjacent to the facility is not designated residential space. C. Antennas equal to or less than four feet in height (except ornni-directional antennas which can be up to six feet in height) and with an area of not more than 580 square inches in the aggregate (e.g., one-foot diameter parabola or two-foot by one and one-half-foot panel as viewed from anyone point) are exempt from the height limitation of the zone in which they are located. Structures which are nonconform- ing with respect to height may be used for the placement of omni-directional antennas pro- viding they do not extend more than six feet above the existing structure. Placement of an antenna on a nonconfonning structUre shall not be considered to be an expansion of the nonconforming structure. D. The micro facility shall be exempt from review by the architectural design board if the antenna and related components are the same color as the existing building, pole or support . structure on which it is proposed to be located. E. The shelter or cabinet used to house radio electronic equipment shall be contained wholly within a building or structure, or other- wise appropriately concealed, camouflaged or located underground. F. In single-family residential (RS) zones, micro facilities for a specific wireless provider shall be separated by a distance equal to or greater than 1,320 linear feet from other micro facilities of the same wireless provider. fOrd. 3099 § 1, 1996]. 20.50.020 Development standards for mini facilities. A. Mini facilities are permitted in all zones except single-family residential (RS) zones. B. The mini facility may be located on buildings and structures; provided, that the immediate interior wall or ceiling adjacent to the facility is not a designated residential space. C. The mini facility shall be exempt from review by the architectural design board if the antenna and related components are the same (Revised 12/96) 20-64 color as the existing building, pole or support structure on which it is proposed to be located. D. The shelter or cabinet used to house radio electronic equipment shall be contained wholly within a building or structure, or other- wise appropriately concealed, camouflaged or located underground. E. Mini facilities shall comply with the height limitation specified for all zones except as follows: Omni-directional antennas may exceed the height limitation by 10 feet, or, in the case of nonconforming structures, the antennas may extend 10 feet above the existing structure. Panel antennas may exceed the height limitation if affixed to the side of an existing nonconforming building and blends in architecturally with the building. Placement of an antenna on a nonconforming structure shall not be considered to be an expansion of the nonconforming structure. [Ord. 3099§ 1, 1996]. 20.50.030 Development standards for macro facilities. A. Macro facilities are permitted in all zones except single-family residential (RS) zones. B. Macro facilities may be located on build- ings and structures; provided, that the immedi- ate interior wall or ceiling adjacent to the facility is not a designated residential space. C. The macro facility shall be exempt from review by the architectural design board if the antenna and related components are the same color as the existing building, pole or support structure on which it is proposed to be located. D. The shelter or cabinet used to house radio electronic equipment shall be contained wholly within a building or structure, or other- wise appropriately concealed, camouflaged or located underground. E. Macro facilities shall comply with the height limitation specified for all zones, except as follows: Omni-directional antennas may exceed the height limitation by 15 feet, or, in the case of nonconforming structures, the antennas may extend 15 feet above the existing , , ' Edmonds Community Development Code ( structure. Panel antennas may exceed the height linútation if affixed to the side of an existing building and architecturally blends in with the building. Placement of an antenna on a nonconfoillÚng structure shall not be consid- ered to be an expansion of the nonconforming structure. [Ord. 3099 § 1, 1996]. 20.50.040 Development standards for monopole 1. A. Monopole I facilities are only permitted in the general commercial (CO) zones shown on plate 5. B. Monopole I facilities are permitted in business (BC, BN) zones and certain public and open space sites (i.e., Wood way High School, Edmonds High School, and Five Cor- ners Water TanklFire Station 6) with a condi- tional use permit. C. Monopole I facilities are not permitted in residential zones (RS and RM), the com- mercial waterfront (CW), open space (OS), public (P) zones, except when expressly pro- vided for in this chapter. D. Antennas equal to or less than 15 feet in height or up to four inches in diameter may be a component of a monopole I facility. Antennas which extend above the wireless communica- tions support structure shall not be calculated as part of the height of the monopole I wireless communications support structure. For exam- ple, the maximum height for a monopole I shall be 60 feet and the maximum height of antennas which may be installed on the support structure could be 15 feet, making the maximum permit- ted height of the support structure and antennas 75 feet (60 feet plus 15 feet). E. Co-location on an existing support struc- ture shall be pennitted. Macro facilities are the largest wireless communication facilities allowed on monopole 1. F. The shelter or cabinet used to house radio electronics equipment and the associated cabling connecting the equipment shelter or cabinet to the monopole I facilities shall be concealed, camouflaged or placed under- ground. Monopole I facilities shall be subject 20-64.1 20.50.050 to review by the architectural design board using the procedures and review criteria spec- ified in Chapter 20.10 ECDC and this chapter. G. Monopole I facilities shall be landscaped in confonnance with Chapter 20.12 ECDc. H. Monopole I facilities adjacent to a sin- gle-family zone shall be set back a distance equal to the height of the wireless communica- tion support structure from the nearest single- fanúly lot line. [Ord. 3099 § 1, 1996]0 20.50.050 Development standards for monopole II. A. Monopole II facilities are only permitted in the general commercial (CG) zones shown on plate 5; provided the wireless communica- tions support structure shall be designed to accommodate two or more wireless communi- cations facilities. B. Monopole II facilities which exceed 150 feet in height or and located witilln 300 feet of a residential (RS or RM) zone or located in cer- tain public and open space sites (i.e., Wood way High School, Edmonds High School, and Fi ve Corners Water Tank/Fire Station 6) shall require a conditional use pennit. C. Monopole]] facilities are not pemùtted in residential (RS and RM) zones, business (BN and BC), commercial waterfront (CW), open space (OS), public (P) zones, except where expressly provided for in this chapter. D. Co-location of wireless communication facilities on an existing support structure shall be peITIÙtted. . E. Macro facilities are the largest peITIÙtted wireless communication facilities allowed on a monopole]] facility, Antennas which extend above the monopole]] wireless communica- tions support structure shall not be calculated as part of the height of the wireless communi- cations support structure. For example, the maximum height for a monopole II facility shall be 150 feet and the maximum height of antennas which may be installed on the sup- port structure could be 15 feet, making the maximum pennitted height of the support . EXH H3 ~T --Ð-- lHeVlseo t!/~t>T P " f". r- :;:¿ '--\."'" 9 AV,:::-< -'"u \~,:. 20.50.060 structure and antennas 165 feet (150 feet .plus 15 feet). F. The shelter or cabinet used to house radio electronics equipment and the associated cabling connecting the equipment shelter or cabinet to the monopole II facility support structure shall be concealed, screened, camou- flaged or placed underground. Monopole II facilities shall be subject to review by the architectural design board using the proce- dures and review criteria specified in Chapter 20.10 ECDC and this chapter. G. Monopole II facilities shall be land- scaped in conformance with Chapter 20.12 ECDc. H. Monopole II facilities adjacent to a sin- gle-family zone shall be set back a distance equal to the height of the wireless communica- tion support structure from the nearest single- family lot line. In any case, if the monopole II facility is within 300 feet of any residentially zoned (RS or RM) lot, a conditional use pennit will be required. 1. Monopole IT facilities shall be separated from each other by a distance equal or greater than 1,320 feet. [Ord. 3099 § 1, 1996]. 20.50.060 Development standards for lattice towers. A. Lattice towers are only pennitted in the general commercial (CG) zones shown on plate 5; provided the wireless communications support structure is built to accommodate the location of two or more wireless communica- tions facilities. B. Lattice towers which exceed 150 feet in height or are located within 300 feet of a resi- dential (RS or RM) zone or are located in cer- tain public and open space sites (i.e., Woodway High School, Edmonds High School, and Five Corners Water TanklFire Station 6) shall require a conditional use permit. C. Monopole II facilities are not permitted in residential (RS and RM) zones, business (BN and BC), commercial waterfront (CW), open space (OS) and public (P) zones except where expressly provided for in this chapter. (Revised 8/96) 20-64.2 D. Co-location on an existing support structure shall be permitted without an addi- tional conditional use permit; provided there is not substantial change to the existing support structure. E. Macro facilities are the largest pemútted wireless communication facilities allowed on a lattice tower. Antennas which extend above the lattice tower wireless communications sup- port structure shall not be calculated as part of the height of the wireless communications support structure. For example, the maximum height (without a conditional use permit) for a lattice tower shall be 150 feet and the maxi- mum height of antennas which may be installed on the support structure could be 15 feet, making the maximum permitted height of the support structure and antennas 165 feet (150 feet plus 15 feet). F. The shelter or cabinet used to house radio electronics equipment and the associated cabling connecting the equipment shelter or cabinet to the lattice tower support structure shall be concealed, screened, camouflaged or placed underground. Lattice towers shall be subject to review by the architectural design board using the procedures and review criteria specified in Chapter 20.10 ECDC and this chapter. G. Lattice towers shall be landscaped in confonnance with Chapter 20.12 ECDc. H. Lattice Towers adjacent to a single-fam- ily zone shall be set back a distance equal to or greater than the height of the wireless commu- nication support structure from the nearest sin- gle-family lot line. In any case, if the lattice tower is within 300 feet of a single-family lot, a conditional use permit will be required. 1. Lattice towers shall be separated from each other by a distance equal or greater than 1,320 feet. [Ord. 3099 § 1, 1996]. 20.50.070 Additional conditional use pennit criteria for monopole I, monopole II and lattice tower. In addition to the conditional use pennit cri- teria specified in Chapter 20.05 ECDC, the fol- Edmonds Community Development Code lowing specific criteria shall be met before a conditional use pennit can be granted: A. Visual Impact. Antennas may not extend more than 15 feet above their support- ing structure, monopole lattice tower, building or other structure. 1. Site location and development shall preserve the pre-existing character of the sur- rounding buildings and land uses and the zone district to the extent consistent with the func- tion of the communications equipment. Wire- less communication towers shall be integrated through location and design to blend in with the existing characteristics of the site to the extent practical. Existing on-site vegetation shall be preserved or improved, and disturbance of the existing topography shall be minimized, unless such disturbance would result in less visual impact of the site to the suITounding area. 2. Accessory equipment facilities used to house wireless communications equipment should be located within buildings or placed underground when possible. When they can- not be located in buildings, equipment shelters or cabinets shall be screened and landscaped in confonnance with Chapter 20.12 ECDc. B. Noise. No equipment shall be operated so as to produce noise in levels above 45 dB as measured from the nearest property line on which the attached wireless communication facility is located. C. Other - Application and Conditional Use Criteria - FCC Pre-emption. In any pro- ceeding regarding the issuance of a conditional use permit under the terms of this chapter, fed- eral law prohibits consideration of environ- mental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that the proposed facilities comply with the Federal Communications Cormnis- sian regulations concerning such emission. [Ord. 3099 § 1, 1996]. 20.50.080 Exemption. The following are exempt from the require- ment of a conditional use permit, and shall be considered a permitted use in all zones where wireless and attached wireless cornrnunica- 20-64.3 20.50.090 tions facilities are permitted: Minor modifica- tions of existing wireless communications facilities and attached wireless communica- tions facilities, whether emergency or routine, so long as there is little or no change in the visual appearance. Minor modifications are those modifications, including the addition of antennas, to conforming wireless and attached wireless communications facilities that meet the performance standards set forth in this chapter. [Ord. 3099 § 1, 1996]. 20.50.090 Obsolescence. A wireless communications facility or attached wireless communications facility shall be removed by the facility owner within six months of the date it ceases to be opera- tional or if the facility falls into disrepair. [Ord. 3099 § 1, 1996]. E' ,é,,': E:; ~T -D - PAG:= 3 ,OF / , ----. (Revised 12J96) 20.50.090 40' Panel Antennas Wood Telephone Pole Underground Ground Cabling Support Equipment Microcells EXISTING WOOD UTILITIES POLE WITH ATTACHED ANTENNAS Omni Directional Antenna (Whip Antenna) (Revised 12/96) 40' c:; Wood Telephone Pole Underground Ground Cabling . Support Equipment ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT MOUNTED ON POLE EXISTING WOOD UTILITIES POLE WITH ATTACHED ANTENNAS 20-64.4 Plate 1 ( Edmonds Community Development Code { M'onopole I Wood Pole Above Ground Cabling Option Above Ground Cabling Electronics Equipment Shelter Panel Antennas Monopole II 120' Omni Antenna Omni Antennas Steel Monopole Above Ground Cabling Option Electronics Equipment ~ Shelter Chain link Fence Optional EX" ';~'..~' : \ !-i it:) 'I i 20-65 4 PAGE 20.50.090 Plate 2 60' D , dF:_~dêJ96) 20.50.090 Lattice Tower Plate 3 ( p", ~m With Panel Antennas Scale Is 2 Times Regular View 60' Steel Lattice Tower S' x 16' Equipment Shelter Elevation View LATIICE TOWER WITH PANEL ANTENNAS FULLY SECTORIZED - 12 ANTENNAS - 4 ON EACH SIDE Less Obtrusive Mounting Panel Antennas 45' Water Tank 8' x 16' Equipment Shelter ~ WATER TANK WITH PANEL ANTENNAS (Revised 12196) 20-66 Edmonds Community Development Code 20.50.090 Plate 4 I L Less Obtrusive Exam pies Panel ANNTENAS AFFIXED TO BUILDING FACADE ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT IN SMALL SPACE INSIDE BUILDING Panel Antennas ~ { ) I J ? t1 III III III III III - - ROOFTOP MOUNTED PANEL ANTENNAS ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT IN SMALL SPACE INSIDE BUILDING E.,' ',f',' .,"~'-,",~," -./'-':~:~~ ;" D '-'---~. 20-67 PAGS~5 -'__n ',,);-' q =--(Re-vise<:W2/96) """"'-"""'~~ . '-~-"-""»'~~"*"""'~I ~ -,.. ,>' " I' ./ -"-, '<~'~'!I"""'. ~~,:.".".~t""'~""'!""":~I~' :-:.~;,.¡,;:_:_',::;~,.';..','".:::.;,...",..:, '. '~~'i.I;;rT.~'!;~ :¡./'~, '-;;¡:;;;":':>":~':r'.":<.-~.r"",I, --:;';";'~""'~:~-~,,:-' ': ':::;,; ':j::<~ ":~.w.iië1ëss"P@'iJ)ïiif7fij', ; ié.øfiéfiÍl1Š!fi.ø'èïlifièš' > ("""" '.',.., , '."..' "':':~:!~"~>7:.\t'«~.'i1'...~~!i-.doiJ\l.~.i~I""~' ,~.. 'iI'iW~.~""~~.It'~"';~"'t<l8I,..,...:.: ",-..., .' --":~'~':-;-$O¡¡1î!;~1r"lò:....._'""""" . ~~"!:.~' <. '~.~,... ,'.."-:,, ... " ~:':1l i fi1ï f a1i ømsUšfl/!,(ffffie e.:llø, we fsi'~i~~~g/S}.? 1;'7.!~.~Y".:;/;IIJ\<'JlI1~~"""'i'f";$r";*,~,,: f . ,- '~ \'".':.'.'>..,i,".,:.:,~.":,,,::.~.',..!;~,'.:.',",'.~.','.:,:_:"',,.'::_~:.::~,,:,,:,0/ ~~,..¡. ,~","I'A"'j.Ji¡~!iü'('~"'/~~~II,~"¡SiE!"'I'. .'r...¡¡;~;,!,t¡ .I<:.~"", ;'."';"01-\;.1 .. afJCJ:?lvløfi7øI!J.OleNI,Ú¡ø€llllles,":ig,,~',:;1,,~',\;i,:'~~::'::!~';,', ,'~" I :' ;~:~;';'~I~~3~:~~\:ç,~~~~~:~1';:,~~;:~:ø~r.(i;tj;,:~tì~~"~~~~~\:~;'~~.::~~.;::,:~¿:?~'~~'~:)iØ~~: ~- . ~I ::, '::"I :," : ,-'.: ',,: 't"~:'I:':';\j;.~ ;1'. : ; 1 ~P:~~..t~1' .1'.' Þ-..., ..1 , ' ........,"".".. ..'Iff.. "".. ";~:'~:"'" ~',1!2:~!5Jt: . ~..,.~,;~' r-. . , '"~"""""""'I\ .~"'¡\'t."" 'x "",:_, f;';;,::;:::r. '!"I,~,"'-=~' ",:, ""',;""".", ,::.~.:::..1i't~.N;..,:~.~;. ,,* \, , :',~~ 1,(;::¿~~, .~::: ;':~~f\'~"'., "" " , "'~""~""""'" ""¡,-,,",.,,, "'::');1' ~://. -:---- A:'", ,/:, 'xl ( , ,r-l ~-1"" -,0,. ¡), <- Fr~1 ' :" ,'\ .. ""'\'-:.~,,' "'" , " '. , ,; '.'" """ .' '0 ',.., , In", ,',< ..;,,'-1': . ," , t-: ' i:;~:1J",l~;~í:. ,':: "'~:.b: ,'t'; "p~ - - .:: ;)'.:;/t%¡~1~t~r'" ~/:::"J;"'" -I" :"'. "":,.,~::~.':;::':;7;:':'::'::;¡iÆi:';,", ...;"1',, .."',,~ "", .:,: .,"Ii :'.:;i~ ;;:fìS:~~l . .../"'.:'1 , ...(~~ :, ", "'(,,","'/,~:. ":hf":;..:~~:>~~~:~.;}" " ,'. I ~,,~ ' <¡ , ;:'~~,;:...)-::..;~.r,,:,,~;j,,¡\:~:},::,,"':. -:' , '" I ø \, ,"'"'" I r-1-.' ~.~"¡";"~,:-ë"':!:,~"..' ":--",,' ~ ,.,,~ 'M '", ',,: '::!"J~"':::'~:';¡:'J/" .- ", , I r-" Z; .~:,: "':.?//.' "',, I "" \" J,,'; , , ',' ..". ' ,,' , "', '. ,,' " , , PI' f æ#';-~;,""~..c_~2J~ j ..td2- ',~ "'Oh I I . , a e -:{W~ll~ - -- : , , i,n,'" >,~.,: Anm of Detail" ' - - - "L:--=':_~..- ." : - i'.. T. Legend " '. fJ():":::'::!'.;::;:):;::::,,:~(;Sl::J::)1~':j;();:"~;.:, Ha,:;",'lJs <: C~::::::ïor:"!i Us!.! p(:~;.,: ,,' ":""r',:: ~ ::():'~::: :;:1[!: U;;':: P(~~:ì::: '(~:!\:¡~Q:: W"," .....¡:I:,~: :no 'C(:::." :¡ H(!S:i!i!::::.!: I",:;::,,' ", :r <:: s:;(::,,;,:¡C ":;,~:::iO:1S,, "-".'" . "".' . ,I' ¡ , ; .- - - "" '",',' , '" I .'/ I ,," /' .)1 ,,' , .".. , "'" 0" ., " . , " . r . .-1 ~> Jt,,~.,' , ' ,,"':" \"~ " '" ,', 1 ~:" "'" ", , \~/?"\ ' ::~~:\';""",~'", , .. ," ,,'" ..., .' " f ", - ... ~,,', , . j" I , ," "I I' '.', ~ i :' : . ", i' "~.. ! "":::: '¡~ , i' ; I ' , I I , r. ... I r '-...'7', i t,ii I"" ,..- ' i ""r" IX W u" <.:J -------------' ",', :1 ì ~ u... 0 t-- '0) 0- cr: UJ X c~ .~~- UJ(L 21.55.030 ( the standard established by that section. fOrd. 2713,1989]. 21.55.030 Lot depth. Lot depth means the depth of the lot mea- sured on a line approximately perpendicular to the fronting street and midway between the sidelines of the lot. 21.55.040 Lot line. Lot line means any line enclosing the lot area. (See also, Rear Lot Line, Side Lot Line, and Street Lot Line.) 21.55.050 Lot width. Lot width means the distance between the lot lines measured at right angles to the line establishing the lot depth at a point midway between the front lot line and the rear lot line. Excluded from the computation will be that area of the lot used primarily for access. 21.55.060 Landslide hazard area and earth subsidence. Those areas identified in the Roger Lowe Associates, Inc. report as on fùe with the city clerk and the accompanying landslide hazard map as having a greater than zero percent probability of landslide or subsidence hazard. [Ord. 2445 § 2, 1984]. (Revised 8/96) 21-14 Chapter 21.60 "1\1" TERMS Sections: 21.60.002 21.60.004 21.60.006 21.60.010 21.60.020 21.60.030 21.60.040 21.60.045 21.60.046 21.60.050 21.60.060 Macro facility. Micro facility. Mini facility. Mobile home. Mobile home park. Moorage. Motel. Monopole 1. Monopole II. Multiple dwelling. Multiple dwelling units. 21.60.002 Macro facility. Macro facility is an attached wireless com- munication facility which consists of antennas ~qual to or less than 15 feet in height or a par- abolic antenna up to one meter (39.37 inches) in diameter and with an area not more than 100 square feet in the aggregate as viewed from anyone point. fOrd. 3099 § 9, 1996J. 21.60.004 Micro facility. Micro facility is an attached wireless com- munication facility which consists of antennas _equal to or less than four feet in height .~~ omni-directional antennas which may be up to six feet in heigh.!land with an area of not more than 580 square inches in the aggregate (e.g., one-foot diameter parabola or two-foot by one and one-hali-foot panel) as viewed from any one point. The permitted antenna height ( includes the wireless communication facility support structure (see Title 22, Plate 1). fOrd. 3099 § 10, 1996]. 21.60.006 Mini facility. Mini facility is an attached wireless commu- nication facility which consists of antennas ~-?l to or less than 10 feet in height or a par- abolic antenna up to one meter (39.37 inches) in diameter and with an area not more than 50 E-_.. rAGS j) 0 F-_=_..9 : i . I c¡ Edmonds Community Development Code ( square feet in the aggregate as viewed from anyone point. [Ord. 3099 § 11, 1996]. 21.60.010 Mobile home. Mobile home means a building over 32 feet in length, assembled and transported to a site ready for occupancy, and which is not placed on a pennanent foundation and does not meet the provision of the building code for houses. (See also, Trailer.) 21.60.020 Mobile home park. Mobile home park means land where two or more mobile homes are stored or used. (See also, Trailer Park.) 21.60.030 Moorage. Moorage means a place to tie up or anchor a boat. 21.60.040 Motel. Motel means a building containing units which are used as individual sleeping units having their own private toilet facilities and sometimes their own kitchen facilities, designed primarily for the accommodation of transient automobile travelers. Accommoda- tions for trailers are not included. This tenn includes tourist court, motor lodge, auto court, cabin court, motor hotel, motor inn and sinúlar names. (See also, Hotel.) 21.60.045 Monopole I. Monopole I is a wireless communication facility which consists of a support structure, the height of which shall not exceed 60 feet (see Title 22, Plate 2). [Ord.3099§TI, 1996].- 21.60.046 Monopole ll. Monopole II is a wireless communication facility which consists of a wireless communi- cations support structure,.-E:reater than 60 feet in height erected to support wireless communi- cation antennas and connecting appurtenances (see Title 22, Plate 2). [Ord. 3099 § 13, 1996]. 21-14.1 21.60.050 21.60.050 Multiple dwelling. Multiple dwelling means a building or a group of buildings on the same site containing two or more separate dwelling units. (See also, Dwelling Unit.) r' , 't' -P. Ph~~~~_- OF__--1 (Revised B/96) ~ ~~~:;;~7 5. Lighting for parking lot areas, structures and statu p.y with the design criteria in Section 2 usmess Park, Manufacturing Park egu ations. 20C.8O.740 TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES 20c.80.7405 Purpose. In addition to implementing the general purposes of the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations, this section addresses the issues of appearance and safety associated with broadcast and relay towers, amateur radio towers, telecommunications monopoles, satellite dish antenna(e), and related equipment. It provides adequate siting opportunities at appropriate locations within the city to support existing communications technologies and to encourage new technologies as needed for Redmond businesses and institutions to stay competitive. A wide range of locations and options for the provision of wireless technology which minimize safety hazards and visual impacts sometimes associated with wireless communication facilities are provided. The siting of facilities on existing buildings or structures, collocation of telecommunication facilities on a single support structure, and visual mitigation tactics are encouraged to preserve neighborhood aesthetics and reduce visual clutter in the community. 20c.80.7410 Permits and Exemptions. a. Permits Required. 1. Land Use Charts and Final Approval Authority. The final approval authority for applications made under this Section shall be defined by the appropriate permit procedure as outlined in the Permitted Land Use Charts, (20C.65.20-030 - Urban Recreation Zone, 20c.30A.220 - Residential Zones, 20C.40.1 00 - City Center Zones, 20c.50.21 a-Commercial Zones, 20C.60.215 - Business, Manufacturing and Industrial Zones, and 20C.70.700(25) - Gateway Zones). At the discretion of the approval authority, an application may be referred to the Design Review Board for its review and recommendation. Should a Special Exception be sought pursuant to Section 20C.80.7440, Special Exceptions, the final approval authority for granting of the Special Exception shall be the same as that of the underlying permit. A request for a Special Exception shall be processed in conjunction with the applicable project permit, and shall not require additional application or fees. 2. Building Permits. A building permit is required for all telecommunications facilities unless specifically exempted under subsection (b), Exemptions. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Ordinance No. 1930 ExHtBrr E -.. -"----==- I2PA Gf-Ls fä-~QN~~C,-8J~}OO 3. Telecommunications Facility Permits. A Telecommunications Facility Permit is required for all telecommunications facilities which are not reviewed under Special Development Permit (Type IV) or General Development Permit (Type II) processes, except for wireless communication facilities which collocate on an existing broadcast and relay tower, where adequate provisions for antennae and ground-mounted equipment exist. 4. Combined Review. Telecommunications facilities regulated under this section which are proposed in conjunction with a site plan approval application for commercial or residential development shall not be required to obtain separate Building Permit approval or separate Telecommunications Facility Permit approval. However, communications facilities will be reviewed according to the same criteria outlined in this Section. 5. Summary of Required Permits. The appropriate permit procedure is delineated in the Permitted Land Use Charts and summarized as follows: Small Satellite Dish Antenna( e): Small satellite dish antennae e) require no permits and are exempt under this section. Large Satellite Dish Antenna(e): Large satellite dish antenna(e) require a building permit and a Telecommunications Facility Permit (Type IA). Amateur Radio Towers: Amateur radio towers require a building permit and Telecommunications Facility Permit (Type IA). Broadcast and Relay Towers: Broadcast and relay towers and other freestanding support structures require a building permit and a Special Development Permit (Type IV) in all zoning districts where allowed, except the Industry (I) and Manufacturing Park (MP) zones where a General Development Permit (Type II) is required. Wireless Communications Facilities: Wireless communication facilities collocated on an existing broadcast and relay tower, where adequate provisions for antennae and ground-mounted equipment exist, require a building permit only. Wireless communication facilities attached to non-residential structures within all zoning districts require a building permit and a Telecommunications Facility Permit (Type IA). Wireless communication facilities not attached to an existing structure and not mounted on a broadcast or relay tower (i.e. stand-alone or ground-mounted facilities with antenna(e» requires a building permit and Telecommunication Facility Permit (Type IA). Wireless communication facilities attached to a residential structure require a Special Development Permit (Type IVLf . . ... .. . ".'.. DEVELOPMEN1"JŒGULA TION1" '.~; Ordinance..N6. .°1930 . A. B. C. D. E. . 1J t: SECTION 20c.SO.700 .- ... . ( { ( ( b. Exemptions. The following antenna(e) shall be exempt from this Section as follows: l. VHF and UHF receive-only television antenna(e): VHF and UHF receive- only antennae e) shall not be required to obtain site plan approval nor shall they be required to obtain building permit approval. VHFIUHF antenna(e) shall be restricted to a height limit of no more than 15 feet above'the existing or proposed roof 2. Small Satellite Dish Antenna(e): Small dish antenna(e) in all zones shall be exempt from obtaining site plan approval and shall not be required to obtain building pennit approval. 20C.80.7415 General Siting Criteria. The Pennitted Land Use Charts identify zoning districts and the review process for telecommunication facilities. The development standards in this Section address setback and other site specific location factors. Siting criteria for broadcast and relay towers and wireless communication facilities are necessary to encourage the siting of those facilities in locations most appropriate based on land use compatibility, neighborhood characteristics, and aesthetic considerations. No general siting criteria are necessary for satellite dishes or amateur radio towers because these facilities are allowed within all zoning districts. Generally; collocation on existing broadcast and relay towers is encouraged by fewer standards and less complex pennit procedures (refer to Permitted Land Use Charts). Further, attachment of antennae e) to existing nonresidential structures and buildings primarily within industrial, manufacturing, business park, and commercial zoning districts is preferable to broadcast and relay towers or monopoles. The City may request feasibility studies associated with applications for telecommunication facilities which demonstrate that locations on existing structures have been explored as the preferred siting alternative. Broadcast and relay towers are not allowed within the urban recreation and rural residential zones (i.e. DR, RA-5, and R-l) of the City unless reviewed through theo Essential Public Facilities Review Process (RCDG 20C.80.750). When a broadcast and relay tower is proposed, preferred locations are within the Industry (I) and Manufacturing Park (MP) zoning districts by utilizing Type II (i.e. General Development Pennit) permit procedures. a. Broadcast and Relay Towers. Broadcast and relay towers including monopoles shall be minimized by collocating wireless facilities on existing towers. New broadcast and relay towers are most appropriately located in industrial areas followed in order of preference by manufacturing, business, commercial, and residential areas Zones I, MP, BP, CO, CB, GC, PA, RC, NC, GOD, CC and R-30 through R-2). Broadcast and relay towers are not allowed in urban recreation, rural, and large-lot residential zones (A, OR RA-5 and R I), unless reviewed through the Essential Public Facilities Process (RCOG 20c.80.750). D EVELOPM ENT REGU LA TIO NS 14 ~ ~..ðC!~ Ordinance No. 1930 .PAGE ~ ()f: {c; ( b. Wireless Communication Facilities. The following sites shall be considered by applicants as the preferred order for location of proposed wireless facilities including antenna(e), equipment, and equipment shelters. As determined feasible, and in order of preference, the sites are: I. Existing Broadcast and Relay Towers: On any existing site or tower where a legal wireless telecommunication facility is currently located regardless of underlying zoning. 2. Industrial, Manufacturing: Structures or sites used exclusively for Industrial and Manufacturing Park uses within the I and MP zones. These are areas of more intensive land uses where a full range of public facilities are expected. 3. Publicly-Used Structures: Attached to existing public facilities such as water towers, utility structures, fire stations, bridges, and other public buildings within all zoning districts not utilized primarily for recreational uses. (Refer to Telecommunications Ordinance for rules and regulations specific to facilities located on City-owned land, buildings, or public right- of-way). ( 4. Business, Commercial and City Center Zoned Sites: Structures or sites used exclusively for manufacturing, research and development, commercial, and office uses. These are areas of more intensive land uses where a full range of public facilities are expected. These zones in order of priority are BP, CO, CB, GC, P A., RC, NC, GOD, and Cc. 5. Residential zones: Structures or sites which are not used wholly for residential use, including residential accessory structures (e.g. deta~hed garage). Where the installation complies with all FCC regulations and standards, institutional structures, places of worship, and other non- residential sites may be considered. 6. Residential structures: Wireless communication facilities attached to residential structures are not permitted in any zoning districts except R-20 and R-30. A Special Development Permit (Type IV) is required to attach a wireless communication facility to a residential structu,re within the R-20 and R-30 Zoning Districts. ( DEVELOPMENT REGULAT.10NS ',.Ordinance'No, 1930 15 S ECTIO N 20c.80.700 ( 20C80.7420 Large Satellite Dish Antcnna(e) - Development Standards. a. Standards for all Zoning Districts. The following standards shall be applied to all proposed large satellite dish antenna(e). 1. Satellite dish antenna(e) reviewed under this Section shall not be located within any front yard, or side yard building setback areas. 2. Mountings and satellite dishes should be no taller than the minimum required for the purposes of obtaining an obstruction-free reception window. 3. To the extent technically feasible, specific paint colors may be required to allow the large satellite dish and mounting structures to blend better with its setting. 4. Screening of all large satellite dish antenna(e) shall be provided with one or a combination of the following methods: fencing, walls, landscaping, structures, or topography which will block the view of the antennae e) as much as practicable from any street and from the yards and main floor living areas of residential properties within approximately 500 feet. Screening may be located anywhere between the antenna(e) and the above mentioned viewpoints. Landscaping for the purposes of screening shall be maintained in healthy condition. 5. No satellite dish antenna(e) shall be used for the purposes of signage or message display of any kind. 6. Construction plans and final construction of the mounting bases of all large satellite dish antenna(e) shall be approved by the City's Building Division. 7. Aluminum mesh dishes should be used whenever possible instead of a solid fiberglass type. b. Additional Standards in Urban Recreation Zone (or successor Agriculture Zone) and Residential Zones - Large Satellite Dish Antenna(e). I. Only one large dish satellite antenna shall be allowed on each property. 2. Large satellite dish antenna(e) shall not be mounted on roofs. . . 3. Large satellite dish antennae e) shall not exceed 12 feet in diameter and 15 feet in height, including their bases. Height shall be measured from existing grade. 4. A Type I visual screen (90 percent solid or more) pursuant to Landscaping Standards) shall be provided as high as the center øfthe dish when viewed from off the site. Above the center of the dish, the screening should be 50 percent or more to the top of the antenna(e) when viewed from off the site. Evergreen plants shall be used to accomplish year-round screening, and shall be large enough at installation to meet appropriate screening standards. c. Additional Standards in Commercial and Industrial Zones - Large Satellite Dish Antenna(e). 1. Antenna(e) may be either roof-mounted or ground-mounted. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Ordinance No. 1930 16 SECTION 20c.80.700 '= ~¡ ~i J:~- (j~ II \ ! . * ,i: \ ~ + ~' I <t< " 't, '., " ~ ~' ~ .,.., 'I '~"'.'.. 2. Ground-mounted: A. Ground-mounted antennae e) shall not exceed 12 feet in diameter and 15 feet in height. Height shall be measured from existing grade. Ground-mounted antenna( e) shall be located outside of any required landscaped area and preferably located in service areas or other less visible locations. From the time of installation, ground-mounted antenna(e) shall be solidly screened (90% or more) as high as the center of the dish when viewed from off the site. Solid screening shall be provided as high as the dish if the proposed location abuts an adjoining residential zone. 3. Roof-mounted: A. Roof-mounted large satellite antenna(e) shall not exceed 12 feet in diameter and 15 feet in height, including their bases. Height shall be measured from the roof line. Roof-mounted antenna(e) should be placed as close to the center of the roof as possible. If the dish is still visible from any point within approximately 500 feet as viewed from ground level, additional screening shall be required to supplement the screening provided by the roof itself. If the dish is not visible from 500 feet or less, no additional screening will be necessary. Roof-mounted antenna(e) shall be solidly screened at least as high as the center of the dish. The screening shall be of a material and design compatible with the building, and can include penthouse screening, parapet walls, or other similar screening. ( B. Co B. c. ( 20c.80.7425 Amateur Radio Towers - Development Standards. 8. Development Standards for all Zoning Districts. I. Amateur radio towers reviewed under this Section shall not be located within any easements, the front yard, or side or rear yard building setback areas. 2. Mountings and amateur radio towers should be no taller than the minimum required for the purposes of obtaining an obstruction-free reception window. 3. To the extent technically feasible and in compliance with safety regulations, specific paint colors may be required to allow the tower to blend better with its setting. 4. . Screening of the bases of ground-mounted amateur ra,dio towers shall be 't ,provided with one or a combination of the following methods: fencing, 'walls, landscaping, structures, or topography which will block the view of the antenna(e) as much as practicable from any street and from the yards and main floor living areas of residential properties within approximately 500 feet. Screening may be located anywhere between the base and the above mentioned viewpoints. Landscaping for the purposes of screening , . DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Ordinance NQ. 1930 17 SECTION 20c.80.700 5. shall be maintained in a healthy condition. Bases of amateur radio towers shall be solidly screened by a view-obscuring fence, wall, or evergreen plantings at least six feet (6') in height. Amateur radio towers shall not be used for the purposes of signage and shall not display a of any kind. Construction plans and final construction of the mounting bases of amateur radio towers covered by this Section shall meet the structural design requirements of this Section and shall be approved by the City's Building Division. Amateur radio towers may be ground or roof-mounted; however, ground- mounted towers must be located at a point farthest from lot lines as feasible. 6. 7. b. Additional Standards in Urban Recreation Zone (or successor Agriculture Zone)and Residential Zones - Amateur Radio Towers. I. Towers shall not be constructed or used for commercial use. 2. The height of a ground-mounted tower may not exceed 65 feet unless a proposal demonstrates that physical obstructions impair the adequate use of the tower. Telescoping towers may exceed the 65 foot height limit only when extended and operating. The combined structure of a roof-mounted tower and antenna(e) shall not exceed a height of25 feet above the existing roofline. 3. In the Urban Recreation Zone (or successor Agriculture Zone), towers shall be located in what would customarily be considered the yard of the residence. Placement shall avoid, to the extent possible, using land that is available for crops, pasturage or other agricultural use. 4. Towers shall be located at a point farthest from lot lines as feasible, or the point farthest from residential structures on abutting properties. 5. In residential zones, the base of a ground-mounted tower shall be screened with fencing, walls, landscaping, or other means such that the view of the antennae e) base is blocked as much as practicable from any street and from the yards and main living floor areas of surrounding residential properties. The screening may be located anywhere between the antennae e) and the above mentioned viewpoints. Landscaping that qualifies for the purpose of screening shall be maintained in a healthy condition. 6. Applications shall document that the proposed tower and any mounting bases are designed to withstand wind and seismic loads as established by the Uniform Building Code. 20C.80.7430 Broadcast and Relay Towers - Development Stand?\rds. 8. Development Standards for all Zoning Districts. I. The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed location was selected pursuant to the siting criteria of Section 20C080.7415. Placement of a broadcast and relay tower shall be denied if an alternative placement of the antenna(e) on a building or other existing structure can accommodate the DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Ordinance No. 1930 18 SECTION 20c.80.700 ~ - , ! ( ,--' þ.... ;J~ ffi ~. :."- J:~ X (1: Wu.. ~ . . ~ ;, . ~ ," '1 '. i -~ . communications needs. Applications shall be required to provide documentation that reasonable efforts to identify alternative locations were made. 2. Owners and operators of a proposed broadcast and relay tower shaH provide infonnation regarding the opportunity for the collocation of other antenna(e) and related equipment. Iffeasible, provision for future collocation may be required. 3. Broadcast and relay towers reviewed under this Section shall not be located within any required building setback areas. 4. Broadcast and relay towers shall not be used for the purposes of signage to display a message of any kind. 5. To the extent technically feasible and in compliance with safety regulations, specific colors of paint may be required to allow the broadcast and relay tower to blend better with its setting. 6. Any fencing required for security shall meet screening codes in the same manner as applied to screening for mechanical and service areas in Section 20c.~0.600, Screening and Rooftop Mechanical and Services Areas. 7. A Washington licensed professional engineer shall certify in writing, over his or her seal, that both construction plans and final construction of the broadcast and relay radio towers are designed to reasonably withstand wind and seismic loads as established by the Unifonn Building Code. 8. All broadcast and relay towers shall be removed by the facility owner within 12 months of the date it ceases to be operational, or if the facility falls intQ disrepair and is not maintained. Disrepair includes structural features, paint, landscaping, or general lack of maintenance which could result in safety or visual impacts. 9. Broadcast and relay towers may be conditioned to allow review for continued use at five year intervals. Rapid technological advancements, changing markets, and regulatory interpretations indicate the need to periodically review the appropriate design of broadcast and relay towers and monopoles. í b. . Additional Standards in Urban Recreation Zone (or successor Agriculture Zone) and Residential Zones - Broadcast and Relay Towers. I. Commercial broadcast and relay towers shall not be allowed in the Urban ~ecreation Zone (or successor Agriculture Zone) the semi-rural (RA-5), or large lot (R-l) zoning districts, unless reviewed through the Essential Public Facilities Review Process (RCDG 20C.80.750). 2. The combined broadcast and relay tower and antenna(e) shall not extend more than 15 feet above the maximum height of the zone for which it is proposed to a maximum of 60 feet. A height bonus of 15 feet may be allowed by the approval authority when collocation is specifically provided for on the broadcast and relay tower. 3. The attached antenna(e) shall not dominate the appearance of the structure. 4. Broadcast and relay towers shall be located at a point farthest from lot lines as feasible, DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Ordinance No. 1930 19 SECTION 20C80.700 (' ( t, / 5. The base of a ground-mounted broadcast and relay tower shall be screened with fencing, walls, landscaping, or other means such that the view of the antenna(e) base is blocked as much as practicable from any street and from the yards and main living floor areas of surrounding residential properties. The screening may be located anywhere between the antenna(e) and the above mentioned viewpoints. Landscaping that qualifies for the purpose of screening shall be maintained in a healthy condition. c. Additional Standards in Commercial and Industrial Zones - Broadcast and Relay Towers. 1. The combined height of a broadcast and relay tower and antenna(e) shall not exceed 85 feet except when collocation is specifically provided for, then the broadcast and relay tower shall not exceed 100 feet. ( 20c.80.7435 Wireless Communications Facilities - Development Standards. B. Development Standards for all Zoning Districts. The following standards shall be applied to all wireless equipment, such as antenna(e) and equipment shelters, exclusive of the broadcast and relay tower. Wireless monopoles, lattice, and guy towers are regulated by the sub-sections that govern broadcast and relay towers, Section 20C.80.7430. I. Placement of a fTeestanding wireless communication facility shall be denied if placement of the antenna(e) on an existing structure can accommodate the operator's communications needs. The collocation of a proposed antenna(e) on an existing broadcast and relay tower or placement on an existing structure shall be explored and documented by the operator in order to show that reasonable efforts were made to identify alternate locations. 2. No wireless equipment reviewed under this Section shall be located within required building setback areas. 3. The combined antenna(e) and supporting structure shall not extend more than 15 feet above the existing or proposed roof structure. 4. No wireless equipment shall be used for the purposes of sign age or' message display of any kindo 5. Location of wireless communication antenna(e) on existing buildings shall be screened or camouflaged to the greatest practicable extent by use of shelters, compatible materials, location, color, and/or other stealth tactics to reduce visibility of the antenna(e) as viewed from any street or residential property. 6. Screening of wireless equipment shall be provided with one or a combination of the following materials: fencing, wall~, landscaping, structures, or topography which will block the view of the antenna(e) and equipment shelter as much as practicable from any street and from the yards and main floor living areas of residential properties within approximately 500 feet. Screening may be located anywhere between the DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Ordinance No. 1930 20 SECTION 20c.80.700 ~J. t 'j 1'- \..) I I: : ~ ð ~ . ffi~ Co.-- I~ X ","- Uid:. " '! .~ . base and the above mentioned viewpoints. Landscaping for the purposes of screening shaH be maintained in a healthy condition. 7. A11y fencing required for security shall meet screening codes in the same manner as applied to screening for mechanical and service areas in Section 20C.80.600, Screening and Rooftop Mechanical and Services Areas. 8. Construction plans and final construction of the mountings of wireless antenna(e) and equipment shelters shall be approved by the City's Building Division. Applications shall document that the proposed broadcast and relay tower and any mounting bases are designed to reasonably witþstand wind and seismic loads. 9. A wireless communication facility shall be removed by the facility owner within 12 months of the date it ceases to be operational or if the facility falls into disrepair and is not maintained. Disrepair includes structural features, paint, landscaping, or general lack of maintenance which could result in safety or visual impacts. b. Additional Standards in Urban Recreation Zone (or successor Agriculture Zone)and Residential Zones - Wireless Communications Facilities. 1. Commercial telecommunication facilities shaH not be allowed in the Urban Recreation Zone (or successor Agriculture Zone) or in Residential zones if the site or building is used exclusively for residential purposes except in the R-20 and R-30 zoning -districts where a Special Development Permit (Type IV) is required. 2. The antenna(e) shall not dominate the structure upon which it is attached and shall be visually concealed utilizing color and compatible material to camouflage the facility to the greatest extent feasible. 3. Associated above ground equipment shelters shall be minimized, and shall not exceed 240 square feet (e.g. 12' x 20') unless operators can demonstrate that more space is needed. Shelters shall be painted a color that matches existing structures or the surrounding landscape. The use of concrete or concrete aggregate shelters is not allowed. A Type I visual screen (see Landscape Standards) shaH be created around the perimeter of the shelter. Operators shall consider under grounding equipment if technically feasible or placing the equipment within existing structures. c. Additional Development Standards in Commercial and Industrial Zones - Wireless Communications Facilities. I. Associated above-ground equipment shelters shall not exceed 240 square feet (e.g. 12' x 20') unless operators can demonstrate that more space is needed. A Type I visual screen (see Landscape Standards, Appendix N) shall be created around the perimeter of the shelter. Operators shall consider under-grounding equipment if technically feasible or placing the equipment within an existing structure. Above ground equipment shelters for antenna(e) located on buildings shall be located within, on the sides or behind the buildings and screened to the fullest extent possible. Screening ( ( . . DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Ordinance No. 1930 21 SECTION 20c.80.700 of exterior shelters shall provide colors and materials which blend with surrounding structures. 20c.80.7440 Special Exceptions. When adherence to all development standards of this Section would result in a physical barrier which would block signal reception or transmission or prevent effective' communication in all pennissible locations, a Special Exception may be permitted provided both criteria outlined below are met. Exceptions do not apply to variations from the Unifonn Building Code. A Variance pursuant to Section 20F.30.130 is required for variations £Tom applicable zoning regulations not described in this Section. The final approval authority for granting of the Special Exception shall be the same as that of the pennit approving the antenna(e) location. A request for a Special Exception shall be processed in conjunction with the pennit approving the antennae e) location and shall not require any additional application or fees. Upon review of Special Exception requests, the approval authority shall consider first those standards having the least effect upon the resulting aesthetic compatibility of the antenna(e) or tower with the surrounding environment. The approval authority shall review setback, size, screening requirements, and height limits. Special Exception Criteria. 1. The applicant shall justify the request for a Special Exception by demonstrating that the obstruction or inability to receive a communication signal is the result of factors beyond the property owner's or applicant's control, taking into consideration potential pennitted development on adjacent and neighboring lots with regard to future reception window obstruction. Pictures, drawings (to scale), maps and/or manufacturer's specifications, and other technical information as necessary, should be provided to demonstrate to the City that the Special Exception is necessaryo The applicant for a Special Exception shall demonstrate that the proposed materials, shape, and color of the antenna(e) will minimize negative visual impacts on.adjacent or nearby residential uses to the greatest extent possible. The use of certain materials, shapes and colors may be required in order to minimize visual impacts. 2. a. Large Satellite Dish Antenna (e) - Special Exceptions. 1. Urban Recreation Zone (or successor Agriculture Zone) and Residential Zones. A. Modifications to requirements for setbacks, size, screening and maximum height limit may be considered by Special Exception. If a Special Exception from the height limit for a ground-mounted dish is requested, the height of the dish shall be limited to a maximum of 18 feet. DEVELOPMENT REG ULA TIONS Ordinance No. 1930 22 SECTION 20c.80.700 ~ ~ i 0---..:: ,.i ~t ,~': t:' ~j ~ :I:W ~~ ,-, ~ I I ,. " '.e . " "" " .'" ;' J' .' Only if these modifications would still block an electromagnetic signal, shall rooftop location be considered, If a Special Exception is sought to obtain a rooftop location, the diameter of the dish shall be limited to six feet and maximum permitted height shall be 15 feet above the roofline. The approval authority may require the applicant to place the antenna(e) in an area on the roof which takes into consideration view blockage and aesthetics, provided there is a usable signal. ( 2. Commercial and Industrial Zones. A. Ground-mounted antenna(e). Exceptions to be first considered shall be from setback, landscape and service area requirements, size and screening requirements. Only if these waived regulations would still block an electromagnetic signal, shall a Special Exception from height requirements be considered. If a Special Exception is sought to vary from the height limit, the height of the dish shall be limited to a maximum of 20 feet. Roof-mounted antenna(e). The first exception to be considered shall be the center of roof requirement; the second exception shall be from the size, and screening requirements, respectively. Only if these waived regulations would still result in a block of the signal shall a Special Exception from height requirements be considered. A Special Exception from the height limit shall be allowed up to a maximum of 20 feet above the existing or proposed structure. The approval authority may require the applicant to place the antenna(e) in an area on the roof which takes into consideration view blockage and aesthetics, provided there is a usable signal and structural considerations allow the alternative placement. b. Amateur Radio Towers - Special Exceptions. 1. Urban Recreation Zone (or successor Agriculture Zone) and Residential Zones. . A. Where a property owner desires to vary from the height, location or setback limitations, the Special Exception Criteria must be met. c. Broadcast and Relay Towers - Special Exceptions. 1. Urban Recreation Zone (or successor Agriculture Zone) and Residential Zones. A. An applicant of a proposed broadcast and relay tower that exceeds height limits shan be required to use the Essential Public Facilities process for site and height approval. See Section 20c.80.750, Essential Facilities. Placement of a broadcast and relay tower within the UR, RA-5 and R-l zones shall require review through the Essential Public Facilities process (RCDG 20c.80.750). B. ( B. t' \. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Ordinance No. 1930 23 SECTION 20C.80.700 " 2. Commercial and Industrial Zones. A. An applicant of a proposed broadcast and relay tower that exceeds height limits shall be required to use the Essential Facilities process for site and height approval. See Section 20C.80.750, Essential Facilities. d. Wireless Communications Facilities - Special Exceptions. 1. Urban Recreation Zone (or successor Agriculture Zone) and Residential Zones. A. An applicant of a proposed wireless facility that exceeds the height limit shall meet the Special Exception Criteria. 2. Commercial and Industrial Zones. A. An applicant of a proposed wireless communications facility that exceeds the height limit shall be required to meet the Special Exception Criteria. This sectio rovides development criteria for Family Day-Care Providers in residential zones and Day are centers in residential, commercial, business and manufacturing zones. a. Family Day- e Providers. (all residential zones) .1. Family Day-C Providers are pennitted as home occupations. (See Home Occupatio egulations in Section 20C.20.070). Family Day-Care facilities are exempt om the limitations on vehicle trips to and from the facility as specified in 2 020.070(1O)(d). 2. The Family Day-Care Pro . er shall not care for more than 12 chil~ren at any time. . 3. Family Day-Care Providers may erate from 5:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. 4. Family Day-Care Providers shall co Iy with all building, fire, safety, health code, and all applicable develop ent standards. 5. Family pay-Care Providers shall obtain a siness license and maintain the use license as long as the use operates. 6. Family Day-Care Providers shall obtain all reqUl d state approvals. 7. Before beginning operation, the State Department Licensing shall certifY that the proposed Family Day-Care Provider will have safe passenger loading area. b. Day-Care Centers. (residential, commercial, BP and MP zones) I. Day-Care Centers shall comply with all building, fire, safety, healt code, and all applicable development standards. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Ordinance No. 1930 2-t SECTION 20c.SO.700 I ~ I. ~ "J ~ ¡~ t (':t, It t-j ~ ~LU ø Lt ~ ! , , .1 ( ay-Care Centers shall obtain a business license and maintain the use It nse as long as the use operates. 3. Day- are Centers shall obtain all required state approvals. 4. In the -5 zone, stand-alone Day-Care Centers are prohibited. 5. Day-Care nters shall not be located closer than 300 feet from another existing day c e operation in residential zones. . . 6. The minimum 10 ize shall be 20,000 square feet in all residential zones. 7. In the NC zone, ho of operation may be limited if residential uses are located in upper storie fthe same building. 8. In the NC zone, Day-Care enters are limited to a maximum gross floor area of 5,000 square feet per tablishment in mixed use or multi-tenant buildings. 9. Play equipment used in the day care perations shall be placed no closer than ten (10) feet from any property Ii . 10. Off-street parking for each employee sha e provided. II. Building design, site plans and landscaping s II be of a character which is appropriate for the area. 12. Day-Care Centers may be approved in new or exist' churches and other places of worship, and no additional approval will be uired provided all other requirements of this section are met. 13. Day-Care Centers located in residential zones shall operate hours of 5:30 am to 9:00 pm. ( \ 20C.80.750 ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES. 20c.80.7505 Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to provide a process to site necessary public uses that may otherwise be difficult to site. This process involves the community and identifies and minimizes adverse impacts. Essential public facilities are defined in Section 20H Definitions. Examples include schools, water transmission lines, sewer collection lines, fire stations, hospitals, jails, prisons, airports, solid waste transfer stations, highways and stonnwater treatment plants. This regulation shall serve to establish an alternative process for pennitting those uses which meet the applicability criteria of subsection 20c.80.7520. The Director of Planning and Community Development shall detennine whether a proposed facility shall be reviewed according to the Essential Public Facility Review Process instead of the review process indicated on the appropriate Use Chart. 20C.80.7510 List of Essential Public Facilities. The City Council shall develop a List of Essential Public Facilities. These facilities meet the definition of Essential Public Facilities or are based on a list maintained by the State of Washington Office of Financial Management. ( DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Ordinance No. 1930 25 SECTION 20c.80.700 A use or facility may be added to the List of Essential Public Facilities based on one of the following criteria: a. The use meets the definition of an Essential Public Facility; b. The use is identified on the State List of Essential Public Facilities maIntained by the State of Washington Office of Financial Management. 20c.80.7520 Determination of Applicability. a. Essential public facilities may be reviewed through the Essential Public Facility Review Process. An applicant may make a written request or the Director of Planning and Community Development may require a proposal to be reviewed through Redmond's Essential Public Facilities Review Process. 0 An applicant may use this process if the facility meets the definition of an essential public facility. If the facility is on the list of qualifying facilities, it automatically meets the definition. ( b. The Director of Planning and Community Development, or the current position having the duties of this office, shall make a determination that a facility be reviewed through Redmond's Essential Public Facilities Review Process based on the following criteria: 1. The facility is on the City's List of Essential Public Facilities or may be added to the list according to section 20C.80. 7510. 2. The facility is a type difficult to site because of one of the following: i. the facility needs a type of site of which there are few sites, ii. the facility can locate only near another public facility, . iii. the facility has or is generally perceived by the public to have significant adverse impacts that make it difficult to site, or iv. the facility is of a type that has been difficult to site in the past; 3. It is likely this facility will be difficult to site, and 4. There is need for the facility and Redmond is in the facility service area. 20c.80.7530 Essential Public Facilities Review Process. a. Facilities to be reviewed through the Essential Public Facilities Review Process shall be processed as either a Rezone or a Special Development Permit (SPD). DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Ordinance No. 1930 26 SECTION 20c.80.700 ~~ t I i........ \ I . ~ ; ~¡ð I' tF~ ~ ro ! ~~ I "f" LU ,. Å... <5 X -~ W~ A rezone process shall be used where one or more sites would require a rezone in order for the use to be permitted, otherwise a SPD process shall be used. (" b. An applicant may have one or more alternative sites considered at the same time during this process. c. The Director has the authority to require the consideration of sites outside the City of Redmond. Alternative sites shall cover the service area of the proposed essential facility. d. An amplified public involvement process shall be required. The purpose of the public involvement process includes the following: to involve the persons within the zone of likely and foreseeable impacts if the involvement process has the potential to lead to a more appropriate design/location or if that process could lead to development of incentives or to address modifications to the facility which would make siting of that facility more acceptable. 1. The applicant shall propose an acceptable public involvement process to be reviewed and approved by the Director. 2. Public involvement activities shall be conducted by and paid for by the applicant. 3. The public involvement process shall be initiated by the applicant as early as feasibly possible. ( e. The Director may require a multi-jurisdictional review process if the facility serves a regional, countywide, statewide, or national need. If this process is required, the applicant shall design an acceptable process to be reviewed and approved by the Director. Applicants shall bè required to pay for this process. f. An analysis of the facility's impact on City finances shall be undertaken. Mitigation of adverse financial impact shall be required. g. . The following criteria shall be used to make a determination on the application: .-: I. Whether there is a public need for the facility. 2. The impact of the facility on the surrounding uses and environment, the City and the region. 3. Whether the design of the facility or the operation of the facility can be conditioned, or the impacts otherwise mitigate, to ma~e the facility compatible with the affected area and the environment. 4. Whether a package of incentives can be developed that would make siting the facility within the community more acceptable. 5. Whether the factors that make the facility difficult to site can be modified to increase the range of available sites or to minimize impacts on affected areas and the environment. : - DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Ordinance No. 1930 27 SECTION 20c.80.700 6. Whether the proposed essential public facility is consistent with the Redmond Comprehensive Plan. 7. If a variance is requested, the proposal shall also comply with the variance criteria. 8. Essential public facilities shall comply with any applicable state siting and pennitting requirements. . HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT AND STORAGE FACILITIES. Purpose. The purp e of the regulations in this section is to ensure that the health of the Redmond community I rotected from the potential impacts of hazardous substances. ation of Hazardous Waste Treatment and Storage Facilities. a. Incidental hazar ous waste treatment and storage shall mean storage or treatment of hazar us waste incidental to the primary use occurring on-site such as those substa es which may be necessary to manufacture or process certain materials or tho substances which are the by-product of a manufacturing or repair p cess. b. Primary hazardous waste stora or treatment shall mean use of a site where hazardous waste is stored or treat as a sole or primary use of the site. Hazardous substances are shipped fi m other locations to be processed or stored on that site. 20C.80.7570 Development Standards. All Incidental or Primary Hazardous Waste Treatment and meet the following conditions: a. Primary treatment or storage facilities shall follow all Sta pursuant to RCW 70.105; b. The proposed development or use shall meet all other federal, st standards concerning the handling of hazardous substances; c. Measures shall be taken in the construction of structures, design of stor e areas, and design of delivery areas to prevent release of materials includin DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Ordinance No. 1930 28 SECTION 20C80.700 ~ .~ I "-~ \~! ...~ 1 ..:;, s= ~ G'-I ":1 I -~. 'v"" LU ~~ C> .. '" -- ~~ SPECIAL USES REGULATIONS DEFINITIONS (To be added to Section 20H of the revised Redmond Community Development Guide.) Amateur Radio Tower: A tower and antenna(e) which transmit and receive non- commercial communication signals, and is defined as an amateur radio tower by the Federal Communications Commission. Guy wires for amateur radio antenna(e) are considered part of the structure for the purposes of meeting development standards. Animal KenneVShelter: A kennel or shelter shall be any outdoor or indoor facility, which houses four (4) or more small domestic animals (that number not including one unweaned litter) for periods longer that 24 hours as a commercial venture, as a non-profit organization, ,or for a governmental purpose. The facility may either be a separate business or an accessory use. Antenna( e): Any system of electromagnetically tuned wires, poles, rods, reflecting discs or similar devices used to transmit or receive electromagnetic waves between terrestrial and/or orbital based points; includes, but is not limited to, radio antenna(e), television antenna(e), satellite dish antenna(e), and cellular antenna(e). Types ofantenna(e) include: 1. Omni-directional (or "whip") antenna(e) transmits and receives radio frequency signals in a 360 degree radial pattern. For the purpose of this document, an omni-directional antenna(e) is up to 15 feet in height and up to 6 inches in diameter. Directional (or "panel") antenna(e) transmits and receives radio frequency. signals in a specific directional pattern of less than 360 degrees. Parabolic antenna(e) (or dish) antenna(e) is a bowl-shaped device for the reCeption and/or transmission of communications signals in a specific directional pattern. 2. 3. Broadcast or Relay Tower: A freestanding support structure, attached antenna(e), and related equipment intended for transmitting, receiving or re-transmitting commercial television, radio, telephone, cellular, or other communications services. Cellular Communications Facility: A Cellular Communications Facility is an unstaffed facility for the transmission of radio frequency signals and includes antennae e), equipment shelters, and other equipment necessary to provide wireless transmission and reception utilizing cellular technology for various wireless telecommunication systems including cellular phones, Personal Communication Systems (PCS), pagers, and similar systems. DEFINITIONS SECTION 20H. r-. ,. 1 ~ I~ (, I -~ "lJ ; t.. I f,J, j;' ~! -~ l :rU¿ ..., (.:J :( - ",', ,.1...:- LlJ..c: ~'L.... Collocation: The placement and arrangement of multiple anennae and equipment on a single support structure and equipment pad area. ( Day-Care Center: A Day-Care Center is an agency which regularly provides temporary care for a group of children between the ages of six weeks to 12 years for periods less than 24 hours in a residence or structure other than the parent's home on. a regular reoccurring basis for payor other valuable consideration, including but not limited to the furnishing of shelter, sustenance, supervision, education and other supportive services. The tenn is not intended to include baby-sitting services of a casual, non-reoccurring nature. Drive-up Stand: A temporary or semi-pennanent structure operating on private property for the purpose of vending food, drink, or retail goods, generally no larger than 6 feet wide by 10 feet long which allows the c\;stomer to remain in his or her vehicle while making a purchase. Equipment Shelter: The structure associated with a cellular communication facility that is used to house electronic equipment and battery systems. Essential Public Facility: A facility, conveyance, or site whose services are provided by a governmental agency, a private or non-profit organization under contract to or with substantial funding from government agencies, or a private organization subject to public service obligations, which is necessary to adequately provide a public service and which is typically hard to site. (See list of qualifying uses under Section 20c.80.75100) Family Day-Care Provider: A licensed Day-Care provider who regularly provides day care for not more than twelve (12) children in the provider's home in the family living quarters. . , Hazardous Waste Treatment and Storage Facilities: A facility, site, or a portion thereof, which reclaims, treats, detoxifies, neutralizes, or stores hazardous waste materials. This definition shall not include temporary household hazardous waste handling 'facilities sponsored by King County or other qualified governmental agencies. . .1 Hazardous Waste: Hazardous waste is any substance as defined as a dangerous waste, a hazardous substance or as a hazardous waste but excluding hazardous household waste as defined in RCW 700105010. 'f Incidental Hazardous Waste Treatment and Storage: Incidental hazardous waste treatment and storage shall mean storage or treatment of hazardous waste incidental to the primary use occurring on-site such as those substances which may be necessary to manufacture or process certain materials or those substances which are the by-product of a manufacturing or repair process. ( DEFI.NITIONS Ordinance No. 1930 2 SECTION 20H. Kiosk: A temporary or semi-permanent structure having one or more open air sides, operating on either private property or public rights-of-way and plazas, generally no larger than 6 feet wide by 10 feet long, which is operated for the purpose of vending food, drink, or retail goods. Large Satellite Dish: Any satellite dish antenna(e) whose diameter is greater than one meter in residential zones or two meters in industrial and commercial zones (see satellite dish antenna(e)). Personal Communication Services (PCS): Digital wireless telephone technology such as portable phones, pagers, faxes, and computers utilizing cellular technology for wireless communication. Primary hazardous waste storage or treatment: Primary hazardous waste storage or treatment shall mean use of a site where hazardous waste is stored or treated as a sole or primary use of the site. Hazardous substances are shipped from other locations to be processed or stored on that site. Reception Window Obstruction: electromagnetic signal. A physical barrier which would block an Satellite Dish Antenna(e): A type ofantenna(e) and supporting structure consisting of a solid, open mesh, or bar configured reflective surface used to receive andlor transmit radio fTequency communication signals. Such an apparatus is typically in the shape of a shallow dish, cone, horn or cornucopia. Small Satellite Dish: Any satellite dish antenna(e) that has a diameter less than or equal to one meter located in any zoning district or two meters within industrial or commercial zones (see satellite dish antenna(e)). Telecommunication Facility Permit: A pennit required to ensure compliance with regulations. within Section 20C.80.740 for large satellite antenna(e), amateur radio towers and wireless communication facilities. Tower: Any built structure, including any guy wires and anchors, constructed for the support of an antenna(e) or antenna(e) that would raise the topmost point of the attached antenna(e) more than 25 feet above the surrounding ground or building. This includes but is not limited to lattice towers, guy towers, wood or steel monopoles and attached antenna(e). Vending Cart: A cart with functional wheels which is not affixed to the ground and which is operated for the purpose of vending food, drink, or retail goods, The cart is generally no larger than 6 feet wide by 10 feet long. DEFINITIONS Ordinance No 1930 3 SECTION 20H. ~ ,~ I....... IJJ \ } 'i ~~ I I'~- ;} -.... ,..~.~ "- CD -""""": . \ ........ c".r¡ I r ; .-L ........ .... ' (-") r'~. ;;.. llL . L.. íbbi 61-..., Wireless Communication Facility (WCF): An unstatfed facility for the transmission and reception of radio or microwave signals used for commercial communication. A wireless communication facility provides services which include cellular telephone, Personal Communication Services (PCS), other mobile radio services, and any other service provided by wireless common carriers licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). A Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) may be attached to an existing structure or a freestanding tower. A WCF consists of antenna(e) and related equipment and may include equipment enclosure, screening, or support structure. DEFINITIONS Ordinance No. 1930 4 SECTION 20H. (' ( / SPECIAL USE REGULATIONS REVISED LAND USE CHARTS 20C.65.20.030 - 20C.30A.220 - 20C.40.100 - 20C.50.210 - 20C.60.215 - 20C. 70. 700(25) - Ordinance 1930 URBAN RECREATION ZONE RESIDENTIAL ZONES CITY CENTER ZONES COMMERCIAL ZONES BUSINESS, MANUFACTURING, AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES GATEWAY ZONES ~ fEYf~/;P~~cf t .. '" . '. --, . - . - "----~ ,PAGE IJ.- -, OF_(_7.. ~- . . Permitted (P) or Conditionally Allowed Use (G) or (5) ..,-.--- ...",.-- "_0------' .. UeCl"cation ' . . , Public parks and open space. p Play fields, ball fields, country clubs, p;olf courses, and p;olf drivinp; ranges. S Recreational trails which do not include onsite parking. P Private parks, open space, and gardens. These uses shall be primarily used for S non-motorized recreation. Private outdoor recreation areas and private outdoor leisure activities conducted S primarily outside enclosed buildings or structures and primarily used for non- motorized recreation. Amusement parks shall be prohibited. Sit down restaurants accessory to any recreation or agriculture use listed in S Section 20C.65.20-O30, Urban Recreation Zone Land Use Chart. Fast food restaurants and restaurants with drive through windows are prohibited. Stables, horse boarding, and eQuestrian ridinp; schools. G Residences & Reluted Uses " .. .. Single-family detached residences occupied by those engaged in agriculture on P the property or operating a stable on the property. Accessory living auarters~l p Bed and b reakfasts 02 G Bed and breakfast inns.3 S Home businesses and family day care providers.4. P Resource Uses" . . Growing and harvesting a!!ricultural crops and forest products. P Horticulture, plant nurseries, arboretums, and pea patches. P Raising or boarding livestock and small farm animals (tlùs category shall not P include kennels).s Road side produce stands selling products p;rown or processed on the propertY. P Road side produce stands other than those listed aboveo S Uti lit,,' J~'acilities Local utilities. G Rep;ional utilities. S . Other . '." ,. ~ *Larp;e Satellite dishes and Amateur Radio Antennae accessory to another use.6 p I *Wireless Communication Facilities.o P / Water extraction wells. p Wildlife shelters and refuges. p Wetland and wildlife mitip;ation areas. S j * " il Ó'-... : ~j 0 Ii- ~' m" I One accessory dwelling unit is allowed for each allowed housing unit. The accessory dwelling unit shall comply wit.hL W Section 20C.30A.510, Accessory Dwelling Units. X (;~- 2 See Section 20C.30.530, Bed and BreakfastslBed and Breakfast Inns, or its successor. uJ ..... 3 See Section 20C.30.530, Bed and BreakfastsIBed and Breakfast Inns, or its successor. u... 4 See Section 20C.30.560, Home Business, or its successor. 5 See Section 20C.65.40-O30. Livestock Restrictions, or its successor. 6 See Section 20C.SO.740, Telecommunications Facilities, or its successor. Ordinance 1930 20C 65 20-030 Urban Recreation Zone Land Use Chart. ; Subject to Special Uses Development Regulations, Section 20C.80.7000 0 : Ik vt \ T irnCo x\su -ur2 . doc ~ 1 20c.30A.220 Residential Land Use Chart ( - R.I.~ -~.:!!.....~}~~.JO ì: .. """ RAo$ Rol- R..J R.J It... "R-6 R-6 R" .. -. --.- -- - --,. lJousine ; <"vt¡,?~."'",': ~ ':' , I Single-family Dwelling P P P P P P P P P P P (See. 20C.30A.300-400) 2 unit structure SI SI SI P P P P (See. 20C.30A.580) 3-4 unit structure SI SI "SI P P P P P (See. 20C.30A.580) 5-12 unit structure p p p p (See. 20C.30A.300-400) 13+ unit structure S p p p (See. 20C.30A.300-400) Accessory Dwelling Units2 P P P P P P P P P P P P (See. 20C.30A.S20) Rental Rooms P P P P P P P P P P P P (See. 20C.30A.600) MobUelManufactured Homes P P P P P P P P P P P P or Parks (See. 20c.30A.570) Retirement Residence S3 SJ ~/S (See. 20C.30A.610) Retirement Residence. S"' S"' P P P Maximum of 16 retirement residence units per acre. (See. 20C.30A.610) ," Retirement Residence. SJ S"' S"' Maximum of 30 retirement residence units per acre. (See. 20C.30A.610) Bed & Breakfasts P P P P P P P P (See. 20C.30A.530) Bed & Breakfast Inns G S (See. 2oc.JOA.5JO) *Subject to Special Use Development Regulations, Section 20C.80.700. 1 Conditionally allowed in new long subdivisions only (See' Section 20C.30A0580, Multiplex Housing). 2 Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit requiredo 3 Retirement Residences may be authorized through a subdivision or binding site plan, in wlúch case a Special Development Permit is not required. Where neither a subdivision nor a binding site plan is required. a Special Development Permit is required to authorize a Retirement Residence. See Section 20C.30A.610, Retirement Residences. . : t ~ i " r ( Ordinance 1930 1 20c.30A.220 Residential Land Use Chart RA,.S 11..1 ! -,-,u - - -. - u" ["ë::~!!!II;~r'Cial ~\(h~.11 "'a~: lIon(~s Ul~sidcntial Care hcilih' Lone: Term Care Facility * Day-Care CenterA Home Businesses6 (See. 20C.JOA.560) & ., Family Day-Care Providers4 Roadside Produce Stand P P Cl1ltul-aI/RccrcationlEntertain ,',,: . . .", ..~.",...,.."",..¡"."),:".,,,.~ Intent'..", "d"<",:""..,,, , Golf Courses; Athletic, Sllorts, S S and Play Fields; Marine Recreation, Commercial Swimminl!: Pool Non-Commercial Indoor Recreation Parks, Open Space Trails I Professiona1 Sen'icc5 ¡Fire & Police Sen'ices Education: Primary/Secondary Schools - Public & Private~ , UeIir.ious Acth'ih' i * Ueligious Facilities: : <250 seats & acccsson' : acth'ities & uses' . , * Ucligiou5 Facilitics: 250-750 seats & accessory activities & uses 7 I Transportation, : Communications. Utilities HeliportslFixed Wing Float Plane8 Local Utili tv Facilities Rel!Ïonal Utility Facilities ., Large Satellite Dishes! Amateur Radio Antenna(e)9 ., Broadcast and Relay Towers9 ., Wireless Communication Facilities9 . Subject to Special Uses Regulations, Section 20C.80.7000 p S P S P S l s P S P P 11..1 p S SS P P P S S G S s P S P P p S SJ P P S P p s s G s S p S P S p R..1 p S SJ P P s p p s S G s S p S P S p ~.~,- ..-'~~ ...I(~ p S SJ P p . .,' s p P s S Cì s S p S P S p p S SJ P P p S 'SJ P p 11.-8 lI.o~.~o- ....!H~' '11..10 p S sJ P P p S S S P P p p S S P p p S S P II."!I-! I I ]I p S S p p , ." \'. r,', :':<q~';,. ~ ':. ",'. 'II ,... . .:~\:.' <, "'" ;:'. ' .. I I s P p s S G s S p S P S P s P p s S G s s P S P S P S p P S S G S S p S P S P S p p S S G s S p S P S p p p S s S s s P S P S p 4 Subject to Special Uses Criteria, Section 20C.80.745, Day-Care. S Day-Care uses are omy allowed in a building or building complex used for other uses such as a school, a church, a meeting hall, or some other building used for more than one purpose, 6 A business license is required in most cases for a home business. , Subject to Special Uses Criteria, Section 20C.80.725, Churches. Synagogues and Temples. 8 Does not include medical airlift. Heliports allowed omy abutting Lake Samrnamish. Limit one aircraft per lot. 9 Subject to Special Uses Criteria, Section 20C.80.740, Telecommunications Facilities. S p p Ordinancc 1930 p p s S G IG I s s . p S P S p S p p s S G I s S p S P Cj' S { " p J u ( I~ '::1 m" p-. :r: : fo '. (¡j1 2 .- ._n__'.. ... _0 1t^,1 II.) ~f r~T~~-- ~ It.IN 1t.2~:" ï't::;Õ-,i 1--'-0 - ~~~r ; CoIl1lJ(~n:ial Rc.~ourcc i i.]\.1 aml~ement : Avricultural Crop IJnlduction J> P P J' ~ " I' ¡ ! Lh'cstock, Dair~', FowilO P P (j ==1- -0:.- '----.. I Horticultural Nursen' P J> P G ~ II Equestrian Facilities I I P J> S S s Is s s 1 ,. Animal Kenoelsu S I I * Subject to Special Uses Regulations, Section 20C.80.700. 0 :1cvt\ TimCox\ \m -resicLdoc 10 All commercial livestock, dairy and fowl enterprises must meet Seattle-King County Health Departmeot regulations and the regulations of the Redmond Municipal Code. Personal, non-commerciallivestock, dairy, and fowl activities are considered an accessory use and are allowed in all residential zones provided that all Health Department and Municipal Code requirements are met. 11 Subject to Special Uses Criteria, Section 20C.80.710, Animal Boarding and Equestrian Facilities. ( " i& % Ordinance 1930 3 - 20CAOA.I00 CITY~. .iER PERMI'ITED LAND USES CHART I, lal lei Ib p I P I P I p P - P 14 I I I 11 P I I P . - Vending CartslKiosks 10 í G I G I G I G I G SERVICES 3,7 - General (except those below) I P I p _L- p I p I p I p . - Family Day-Care (1-6 children) p I p ml p I p I P I p . - Mini Day-Care (7-12 children) . - Day Care Center (13+ children) G G G I G I G I S . . Minor Auto Repair 11 p P I I p - Repair: Electrical appliances 11 motors, and furniture. p I I p Machine shops. - Repair and Rental: Electronic I I I II equipment, stereo, video, P P P I p I p and watches. Residential: 8 9 9 9a 9a - Multi-Family P P P P P I p . Senior Housing 4 9 9 9a 9a p p p p p p .",... Public Facilities 7 ~ UJ and Local Utilities P P P P P P ..,. -' ~-g . Banks With Drive-Through 13 13 -1 I Facilities . p G G All Other Drive-Through 11 2 21 ~II \\\ Facilities p p P .Large Satellite Dishes! 15 Amateur Radio Antenna(e) I P I p L- p I p I p I p .Broadcast and 15 Relay Towers S I s I~__s I s I S I S .Wireless Communication 15 Facilities... I p I p I p I p I p I p oJ () T:;'. P-- P.........;ff..~. n~ ""~"^_I 0_",-'-----' n__:. n__..:_.~. n n 1 - No single-story retail penniued. In multi-story buildings, retail is penniued on the ground floor, but is not required. Restaurants, taverns and delicatessens are allowed on any floor. Nonconfonning single-story uses may expand per Secton 20F.20.500 la - Same as 1 above, except, Single-story sit-down restaurant and entertainment uses not less than 5,000 square feet GFA, and single-story master planned festival retail development adjoining and orienting to the river are pennitted. No surface parking shall be within 150 feet of the river's top of bank. Ib - Retail uses allowed in Foot Hill Design area per footnote 1 above. See also Design Areas Overlays Map, 20CAOA.200. :lc - Same as 1 above, except single-story home and office improvement retail uses selling items such as furniture, fixtures, lighting, and carpet are allowed. I I 2 - Drive-through facilities shall have a minimum of 3,000 square feet GF A of contiguous floor space, shall be limited to one lane, only, and shall provide a minimum queuing distance of 120 feet which is not within the public right-of-way or on-site circulation aisles. 3 - Adult entertainment is governed by Section 20C.80.l75 of the Community Development Guide. 4 - Governed by Section 20C.30.620 Senior Housing Development - Density 1nus. 5- Prior to approval of any clearing, segregation or development pennits; a co ceptual Master Plan which shows, at a minimum, the building sites, streets, open space, required building frontages and plazas of the proposed develolpment shall approved by the Technical Committee and Design Review Board. 6 - Master Site Plan approval required through General Development Pennit ß ocess. See Section 20 F. 7 - On-site hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities pennitted with a dDP provided that State siting criteria are met as set forth in RCW 70.105. A hearing may be required. If the associated pennitted use requires an SDP, consideration of the treatment and storage facility shall be subject to same SDP process and conditions. 8 - Maximum density per lot dependent upon size and width of lot, per the City Center Site Requirements Chart. 9 - Not pennitted on ground floor. 9a - Not pennitted on the ground floor, except through establishment of a Administrative Design Adjustment per Section 20CAOA.300(C). 10 - Subject to Special Uses Criteria, Section 20C.80.730, Carts and Street Vendors. II- Gas Stations, minor auto repair, minor repair and machine shops, and drive-through faciities are prohibited west of 158th Ave. NE, extended. Surface parking is prohibited within 150 feet of the river's top-of-bank. 12- Subject to Special Uses Criteria, Section 20C.80.71S, Automobile, RV and Boat Uses. 13- Subject to Special Uses Criteria, Section 20C.80.720, Banks With Drive-Through Facilities. Banks without drive-through facilities are regulated as General Services. 14 - Gasoline Stations are prohibited in high significance aquifer recharge areas. Please see Section 20C.80.200 , Environmentally Sensitive Areas. IS - Subject to Special Use Criteria, Section 20C.80.740, Telecommunications Facilities. o:\kvt\TimCox\m<ctr.xJs Ordinanr---"30 ,""""""". ,-- 20C.50.210 Permitted Land Uses For Commercial Zones NC GC '--" '" '. ~:: ~ ': ' " '. ::',. ',- ,\ " ' , " Housing/:> ,.,.,,:: ,<' Residential Mixed Use,i. p p Cultural, E'ritei.tail1mcl1~arid'..;'~J,,> "~; .)" . R"'.:....:.; .,¡¡:,~,,'/"::'::' """^'~:~'i:'::~~'~'..~,,,<:~;~~<,~:.,: V,,"~:>:!:;<; . ecreationi::~:':,~"~';:" ;:"',"';.<.:,~P,,:fj:'?'f,.~\:h ~r(~:"~: ~~~:.....:':..:, Cultural Facilities (Libraries, Museums, G2.S Galleries) Nature Exhibits. Zoos, Aquariums. Botanical Gardens . Adult Entertainment Facilities,) '.. ' .. Indoor Public Assembly: Including theaters, conference centers, arenas. auditoriums, skating rinks Outdoor Public Assembly: Including amusement, fainzrounds, swap meets AtWetic/Fitness Centers p J>2.8 P p p Private and Public Parks and Open Space . "'holesalê and,Retail,Trade,," ", .. Building Materials and Garden Supplies, Hardware Centers (with gross floor area less than 75,000 Square Feet) Regional Retail/Wholesale (with gross floor area over 75,000 Square Feet) General Merchandise, Apparel and Accessories, Miscellaneous Retail, including used merchandise stores not othCIWÎse listed. Food Stores, Grocery Stores and Drug Stores (and other accessory retail uses) Bakeries, Coffee Shops, Florists. Video Stores, and similar retail uses Factory Outlets - retail . ' p p4 p G p p p p p p p p p2.8 Eating and Drinking Establishments (Sit-down and/or Carrv~ut) (No Drive Thru) Eating and Drinking Establishments With Drive-ThroulÙ1 Service Taverns, Brewpubs p2.8 Outdoor Produce Stands P G G Retail Verucle Fuel Sa¿es, with or without MÏni- Mart (Gas Stations)5. . Carts and Street Vendors I ¡ Auto and Marine Parts & Accessories P2,S RC** CORK , ,..,..~,~, ",: , ~ M~ ";"\J¡'¡""~"-'!~ ~:~'.'. . . '., . .~ . ~ .: :.,' '.:< ~¡, :', ,..... : .,.. " .:.'.~::. '~.~I."':"~:-;:'~~~.'~~'""¡'" I .., "",;,'~"'i,:<::;;\..;."...\O.\~,t;.¡.~,I.l~,~r~~.~',>.^ ; ':",."':.},~:~L',:;-:Ja':~::,«' tJ'f¡~:'i : '" ':-."'1;'>,~="".~h.l,\!., Y.~fk~:' P . ' " .., ,,' t ,XHib~ f FAGE 1& . E:: -r - OF {c¡ . - -- ~- - " Ordinance 1930 1 NC . New and Used Vehicle Sales ManuracturedJ)roducts ' Printing, Publishing, Graphic Arts U , , , ,', ';, ',: "'" " Crafts, Handcrafted Stone, Clay, Glass Products with associated retail S . ' " 'I"' '. ;--, '..: ',' ".. "" '. " ',,' ~, nrvICCS')o.,:"..", ',: '..<"",'"h'," "',""'.'" "'" ,::":,~':':""."""',,"".",<.->.:\,<';'-:;-;~':.." CommerciallIndustrial Photography~ CinematolD'8Dhv, Video Production Finance, Insurance & Real Estate, Banks, Savings and Loans, Title Offices, Real Estate Sales and Broléëtal1:e Personal Services: LaWldry and Dry Cleaning, Barber and Beautv Salons, Travel Al1:encies Business Services: Computer Rentals, Mailing Centers, CODV, Fax, Telework Centers Professional Services: Physicians, Dentists, Social Services, Architects, Engineers, AccoWltants, Attorneys FWleral Homes and Related Services p2,8 P2.8 Veterinary Offices and Hospitals . Kennels, Animal Shelters '¡'u G . Day-care Centers'¡"¡' Rental Storage and Mini-Warehouses'¡'¿' P2.8 Rental Services: Furniture, Tools. and c~'i"""ent . Vehicle Rentals: Aut~s, Trucks, Trailers, Recreational Vehicles 1 . Auto and Boat Service 1.) Hotels and Motels Hospitals, Clinics, Long-Tenn Care Facilities, Residential Care Facilities Government Services (excluding Maintenance Shoos) Education: Colleges, Universities, Publ~ & Private Schools, Vocational and Tradel . Churches, Temple~, Synagogues, and related activities and usesl Charitable, Social. Professional and Labor Orl1;anizations p2,8 P ,- GC G " ~. ":" " P " ::",>",:",-,:,:<,¡;,: >, ..,' ( RC** CO** P P P P P P P P P P P G14 G P P P P P P " " ..' .« ..': }~;:/<. :;- .. , ;. i.,~ ..~ y.;\t:';. ,> , " , ,," ;,',:, "'::~,", .. h' ". ~^ , , ."', ,~' ;,~ ,,'~,} ,,'" / \ . ( Ordinance 1930 2 / 20C.50.210 Commercial Zones Land Use Chart NC GC RCieie COsleie Trìmsporta tion, ; .:~ '"'.- Communication and Utilities .,. , " .' " ..::: ::';"':, :'.:~~:; .,~ Transit Facilities: Taxi and Bus Stations, Park- p and-Ride Lots, Transit Centers Commercial Parking Lots and Garages.L I .Large Satellite Dishes/Amateur Radio p P P P Antenna(e)18 .Broadcast and Relay Towers.LO S S S S .Wireless Communication Facilities IS p p p P Local Utilities G p Regional Utilities S S * Subject to Special Uses Development Regulations, Section 20C.800700 *'" Only uses subject to Special Uses Criteria, Section 20C.80.740, Telecommunications Facilities. o;\J( \'1\ TimCo x'&u -comm. doc 1 Limited to upper stories in mixed-use structure. 2 Hours of operation may be limited if residential uses are located in upper stories of same building. 3 See Adult Entertainment Regulations in Section 20C.80.705. 4 Not allowed when abutting residential zones. Allowed ifwitlún, or abutting non-residential zones with retail sales. 5 Subject to aquifer protection and Sensitive Areas regulations. 6 Gasoline stations are permitted only when three sides of the site contain non-residential zones. 7 Subject to Special Use Criteria. Section 20C.80.730, Carts and Street Vendors. 8 Limited to gross floor area of 5,000 square feet per establishment in mixed use or multi-tenant buildings only. 9 On-site hazardous waste treatment and storage pennitted provided that Washington State siting criteria (RCW-70.105) are met as determined by the Technical Committee. 10 Subject to Special Use Criteria. Section 20C.80.745, Day-Care. 11 Subject to Special Use Criteria. Section 20C.80.745, Day-Care. 12 No business activities are permitted to operate from storage spaces. 13 Subject to Special Uses Criteria. Section 20C.80.7l5, Auto, RV and Boat Uses. 14 Allowed only in conjunction with automobile sales. 15 Limited to neighborhood-oriented functions such as primary/elementary schools, tutoring, and training centers. 16 Subject to Special Uses Criteria., Section 20C.80.735, Churches, Temples and Synagogues. 17 Street-level retail uses required in parking structures along street frontages. Storage or impoundment of abandoned or damaged vehicles. 18 Subject to Special Uses Criteria., Section 20C.80.740, Telecommunications Facilities. EXHiBi'~r - .. PAl.;¡- /7 E OF f 7 -~.._.- .~ Ordinance 1930 3 20C.60.215 Permitted Land Uses in Business. Manufacturin2 and Industry Zones ( BP MP I P A-B** PA-C** P A-D** Housing " I. . , ' " " ! Residential Mixed Use G1 Recrëåtiòïl' å¡¡d+,,~A*::~:.~<~~i~, "¡'J ~':', :¡,~, "~Y, 'I .. ~, '" , I , , " I """"';:i',""":':'~":/'~~"'~';<;" ::'.':'" .. " . ~ : ,::,':- " :"'¡: :;, ,, '" " EntertaInment :': :'A,~<" , ~" '. I Indoor Public Assembly: Arenas. Auditoriwns. Conference Facilities Corporate Conference Centers p accessory to primary business activity Athletic Clubs and Fitness Centers p p Public and Private Parks and Open p p p Space Whôlcsàle ,and ,Retail ~,;~':~' ,<" " : " ! " >,'" " " " ,', '" .. " ' : I~ ' : ,>', ',,', ,: ..' ';':,,'.", :;(-::' :; " " " " Trade '. I:, " , 'C",h' ¡., .. ,.' '<" ",' " " " " . ",," '," "", Wholesale Trade and Assembly p p P Eating and Drinking Establislunents p p S (Sit-do~Cany-out)in multi-tenant ( buildin~s Retail Vehicle Fuel ~ales (with or S S without mini-marts)' Manuf~~turing and ',' ~ :": :'~: ,< .. " ~, " " : ., ,/, " ", . ~ : ",1:',"" ,,' : : ),,:~ ;','" " .. ! Assembly Uses4, ':" .':'<, >- " " ,, '" , .' ^.'.. '.' ,, '" , , Food and Kindred Product'! p p Factory Outlets" p Apparel and other Textile Products p P Building Materials, including wood P P . products, \tone, gla~s and concrete products . Asphalt and Concrete Batch Plants G G and o~er ~~oor processing operat¡çms . Mining, Quarrying :nd other S Extractive oþerations Furniture and Fixtures S P P Paperboard containers and boxes S p P Printing, Publishing, and allied p p p products Ordinance 1930 1 I BP MP I P A-B** PA-C** P A-D** Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology p P P Products provided large quantities of toxic materials are not used in the manufacturing process Perfumes, Cosmetics and Sinúlar p p Preparations Fabòcat.ed Metal Products S p Industrial and Commercial S p Machinery Computer and Office Equipment p p p Advanced Technology: Computer p p Hardware and Software Electrical and Electronic Equipment p p p and Components Aircraft Parts, Guided Missile and S G P Space Vehicles and Parts Measuring, Analyzing and p p P Controlling Instruments, Photographic, Medical, Optical, Watches and Clocks Miscellaneous Manufacturing p p Industries . On-site Hazardous Wfste S P Treatment and Storage . Off-site Hazardous Waste S Treatment and Storal!;e7 Se¡'\'iceS:~" " '." ,':, ',: " ,:~. .' ", ,,', . . :. '. ",: ',' '" . . ,,' ~.,, : ! Research and Development Facilities p p p Corporate Headquarters and p Regional Offices associated with other Permitted Uses Construction/Contractors: Offices p p and Storage of Materials and Equipment . Construction/Contractors: Offices p I ~ only CommerciallIndustrial Photography, p P ~ t.¡..,' Cinemato~phy, Video Production Business Services: Technology p p U Service and Support, Copy and I Connectivity Centers, Consultants ~ ~j who directly support surrounding <"-~' "-¡ businesses, Telework: Centers ,~ . Day~ Centers U p P ¡¡'¿'.I J ü- ~ Rental Stora~e and Mini p s( I ",-,-1 (9 Warehouses :.. Warehousing and Distribution p p pro W õ: Rental Services: Furniture, Tools, p p and Equipment with Exterior I I Stora~e '- Ordinance 1930 2 Permitted Land Uses in Business. Manufactunnl! BP MP I P A-Dieie P A-Cieie P p Charitable, Social, ProCessional and Labor Organizations T . . '.'" ~ " '" '<" , , ransportation;,::,: ,:,<;~::?", "., Comm,~'ni~å'ti,Jií"j~~cÍ:~~~::", ',",'\':" , . ,.,"..' .'~!>: '.'" ,,' . Utdihes'"^~\:::~'.~/,:,.,,,i¡.., " .. Railroad Facilities (Excluding p Yards, Shops and Mainlcnance Facilities) Transit Facilit\)S: Rail and Park- and-Ride Lots Motor Vehicle Maintenance Garagc. Motor Freight Services and T crminals Hcliports and Helicopter Landing and Stolne (cxcludiml mcdivac) Commercial Parking Lots and Gal'8.lles TV /Radio Broadcasting Studios Towing Operators and Auto hnooundment Yards . Large Satellite Dishes! Amateur Radio Antcnna(c) lS . Broadcast ~d Relay Towcri"" 20C.60.215 . V chicle Rentals: Autos, Truclcs, Trailers. Recreational Vehicles, Constructio~ and Heavy Hauling EQuioment 1 . Auto and Boat Repair .. Hospitals, Clinics, Long-Tenn ean, Facilities, Residential Care Facilities Education: Colleges, Universities, Public Schools, Vocational and Trade Schools . Churÿhes, Synagogues. Temples. (500-7500 seats); & related activities . ChW'Ches, Synagogues, Temples. (>7500 seats), & related activities . Wireless Communication Facilities 15 Local Utilities Regional Utilities Solid Waste Transfer Stations s p p s pl. p p S P P G p Gl2 811 p p p s p p P G p P G G P A-D**( p :< :' ( ~ ", :.~',;;..,""" >,,;, " ,', ': " " .. , ." . , '.. :'. i.,,',:: '", ",'" ' , , p p p s p P G p P G . p S P p S P p S P '" Subject to Special Uses Development Regulations, Section 20C.80.700 "Only ušes s~j~t to Special Use Criteria, Section 20C080.740, Telecommunication Facilities. o:IJc\'t\Tim~x\su-ind.doc Ordinance 1930 3 I Limited to upper stories in a nÜxed use structures. See: Section 20C.60.3S0 regarding maximum number of dwelling units and 2 nwcimum building height provisions. When located in a multi-tenant building. Limited to a maximum seating capacity of SO-pcrson capacity. Hours of operation only 3 allowed bctwccn 6am to lOpm; on-site parlcing to be provided for each employee:. 4 Subject to aquifer protection and sensitive areas regulations in Section 20C.80. Provided retail sales are manufactured goods produced on the premises and accessory or secondary to the primary manufacturing S or wholesaling activity. The outlet area must not exceed 10 pcrocnt of the usct's shan: of the gross floor area or 1,000 square feet. Rock crushing equipment, asphalt, and oon~ batch plants, silos and other related equipment may cxlcnd to a maximum height of90 feet. ~ Subject to Special Use Criteria, Section 20C.80.72S, Batch Plants and Extractive Operations 8 Subject to Special Use Criteria, Section 20C.80.7SS. Hazardous Waste Facilities 9 Subject to Special Use Criteria, Section 20C.80.74S, Day-Care 10 No business activities are allowed to operate &om storage spaces. 11 When associated with a permitted manufacturing usc. 12 Subject to Special Use Criteria, Section 20C.80.7IS, Auto, RV, Boat Uses 13 Subject to Special Use Criteria, Secti0l12OC.80.73S, Churchc:s, Synagogues and Temples. 14 When the lite is served by public transportation. 1 S Storage or impoundment of abandoned or damaged velúcles prolúbitcd. Subject to Special Use Criteria, Section 20C.80.740. Tclcoonununication Facilities. / EXHiBiT p :\G E-1:L_- [Ç OF __L 1 - .~ Ordinance 1930 4 20C. 70. 700(25) Gateway Permitted Land Uses The chart entitled Gateway PeffiÙtted Land Uses Chart indicates the pemùtted land uses and required review procedure for each use. Land Uses Permitted Uses Scientific, electronic and communications research and development; high technology; light manufacturing; wholesale trade; light warehousing in conjunction with manufacturing and office uses; light P assembly, design, processing, light fabrication and any combination thereof; together with indoor storage and offices associated with such uses (1) (2) General, professional, and government P offices (3) (4) (9) Corporate headquarters and regional offices (3) (4) (10) P Business services, government services and educational services (II) Regional retaiVwholesale (5XIO) P HotellMotel (6) P Restaurant: sit-down, canyout, or P combination (7)(9) Bank p Limited Support Services (3X8) P Daycare p Large Satellite Dishes! Amateur Radio P Antenna( e )(12) Broadcast and Relay Towers(12) S Wireless Communication Facilities(12) P Notes: (1) No acc:cssory or subordinate retail activity is permitted. (2) No outside storage is permitted; provided this docs not exclude secured areas for ovcnúght employee vehicle parlùng or storage of materials used on si~ in conjunction with oonstnlC:tion activity for a permitted uses' use, as long as such storage docs not fa.cc: the pcrimet.cr of the district and is screened and meets fare and other applicable codes. (3) No fanancial. insurance. real cstat.c. securities or title services arc permitted unless the activity internally services the company of which the activity is a part and docs not provide walk-in service to the general public. (4) No medical, dental, individual. or family social services arc permitted. (5) No outdoor storage or sales is penniUed unless contained fully by scn:ening. excluding storage of shopping carts, sales &om food stands 01' carts., and sale of bulk itans in areas immediately adjacent to a sales building. In no case: shall outdoor storage or sales be oriented to the pcrimet.cr of the District. (6) Includes associated OOIÛcrcnoc center, meeting rooms, auditorium. (T) Drivc-through restaurants arc not permitted. (8) These uses .shall not abut or be oriented to the perimeter of the District and no signs for such uses shall be oriented to the perimeter of the District. 'The total uses under this category shall not exceed 30,000 square feet. These uses arc intended to service persons who arc on site in connection with other permitted uses. (9) Storage, employee health club facilities, employee cafct.crias or other employee food service:. and other customary acc:cssory uses associated with the permitted uses Are allowed. (10) No more than a total of 20,000 gsf of rc:suurant uses nor more than two scpal'A~ rc:suunnts arc pcmùtted. Food stands or carts and areas used for sales of food for take out or consumption on prc:misc:s as part of a regional rctaiVwholcsale use. and on-si~ employee food service for employees of any permitted use. Uc excluded tram this provision. (II) Educational services shall only include special vocational and trade. (12) Subject to Special Use Criteria. Section 20C.80.740. Telecommunications Facilities. 0\1< vtll imcoxlgddcht doc Ordinance 1930 ( ( , . RECEIVED FEB 0 2 1996 ( CITY OF L YNNWOOD ORDINANCE NO. 2065 EXTEHI4Al AFFAIRS AN ORDINANCE ADDING NEW SECTIONS AND AMENDING SECTIONS OF THE LYNNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 21 (ZONING CODE) ADDRESSING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILmES. WHEREAS, Wireless Personal Communication Services and Wireless Communication Facilities comprise a rapidly growing segment of the utilities and communications sector and have merit and value for the community and region as a whole; and WHEREAS. Wireless Communication Facilities located in or near residential zones and larger towers must be regulated to 2.Ssure that reasonable mitigating measures have been employed; and WHEREAS, after proper notice, a public hearing was held by the City Planning Commission to consider an amendment to the official text of the Municipal Code of the City of Lynnwood; and WHEREAS. after due deliberation, the City Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that such amendment was desirable; and ( WHEREAS, the City Council recommendations of such amendment; and duly considered the Planning Commission WHEREAS, this amendment is in the best interest of the citizens and property owners of the City of Lynnwood. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF L YNNWOOD DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. LMC 21.02.805 Added. Chapter 21.02 of the Lynnwood Municipal Code is amended by adding Section 21.02.805 to read as follows: 21002.805 Wireless Communication Facility .. A Wireless Communication Facility" means an unstaffed facility for the transmission and/or reception of radio frequency (RF) signals usually consisting of an equipment shelter or cabinet, a support structure and/or other transmission and reception devices. This definition does not include ancillary antennas such as are usual to individual businesses and residences and which conform to height limits and other development standards in the zone in which such antennas would be located. rblordlord .004 8: 17am 01109/% (rat) Page 1 of 8 '-"','7'r~----- F ¡ -.XHìL'. : - ~----- - ~ f.AGE~!~_~_-_. Or- --.?_-~~ ( Section 2. LMC 21.02.806 Added. Chapter 21.02 of the Lynnwood Municipal Code is amended by adding Section 21.02.806 to read as follows: 21.02.806 Wireless Communications Facility Attached A wireless communication facility that is affixed to an existing structure, for example, an existing building, tower, water tank, utility pole, etc. which does not include an additional wireless communication support structure. . Section 3. LMC 21.020807 Added. Chapter 21.02 of the Lynnwood Municipal Code is amended by adding Section 21.02.807 to read as follows: 21.02.807 Wireless Communication Support Structure "Wireless Communication Support Structure" is the structure erected to support wireless communication antennas and connecting appurtenances. Support structure types include, but are not limited to, monopoles, lattice towers, wood poles, and guyed towers. Section 4. LMC 21.02.590 Amended. Section 21.02.590 of the Lynnwood Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 21.02.590 Public Utility Facilities ( "Public utility facilities" means facilities for the transmission, distribution, or collection of electric, telephone, wireless communication, telegraph, cable television, natural gas, water and sewer utility services, and the transportation of people. Section 5. LMC 21.42.100 Amended. Section 21.42.100 of the Lynnwood Municipal. Code is amended to read as follows: ,. """';'~!; ':,'.;:.::~:~;i.U.c ':,:;':i:~: ~ o'~'~:;::~'~ -,..,"~':'~'i'O!:"" ,t>,"'¡"¡":"Æ ífRa~ .."'1"'~I'~ :-'."...~,.:.. .,,',' ".:.. .."," .""",0"',".. 'I ". II ,.. . :tRS--'12f: ~;, ~1-:" ~~ '.~R.I,(D:ry: ~RM¡j~i :;RMM'¿ ".RMH RMHR ,'." " I Publie Utility FacilitiCJ nCA:essary {or C C C C C C C C C C the transmission. distribution or eoUcction o{ electric telephone. wirc1CJs communication. telegraph. cable TV, natUral gas. water. and sewer utility services. excluding sewer treatment plantJ. officcs. repair shops warehouses. and storage yards' WlJ'Cless communication facility P P P P P P P P P P atUchcd (not pcnnittcd on residential structUres) rblorcl\".-d .001 8.17- 01/09/96 (rm) Page 2 of 8 EXHtS;'T F- - PAGF -__-*-__h- OF--1~ ( Section 6. LMC 21.42.1 JOB Amended. Subsection B of Section 21.42.110 of the Lynnwood Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: B. 5. 60 7. Chlordlord_OO4 1:17am OI/()9/% (rm) Public Utility Facilities Public utility facilities necessary for the transmission, distribution or collection of electric, telephone wireless communication, telegraph, cable television, natural gas, water, and sewer utility services, excluding sewe-r treatment plants, offices, repair shops, warehouses, and storage yards shall be subject to the following additional standards: 1. Such facilities shall, not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. 20 The applicant shall demonstrate the need for the pmposerl public utility facility to be located in a residential area, the procedures involved in the site selection and an evaluation of alternative sites and existing facilities on which the proposerl facility could be located or co-locaterl. 3. A site development plan shall be submitted showing the location, size, screening and design of all buildings and structures, including fences, the location, size, and nature of outdoor equipment, and the location, number, and species of all proposed landscaping. 4. The facility shall be designed to be aesthetically and architecturally compatible with the natural and build environment. This includes, but is not necessarily limited to, building design and the use of exterior materials harmonious with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and the use of landscaping and privacy screening to buffer the facilities and activities on the site from surrounding properties. Any equipment or facilities not enclosed within a building (e.g., towers, transformers, tanks, etc.) shall be designed and locaterl on the site to minimize adverse impacts on surrounding properties. All wireless communication facilities shall comply with national, state or local standards, whichever is more restrictive, in effect at the time of application, for non.ionizing electromagnetic radiation. That the applicant shall demonstrate a justification for the proposerl height of the structures and an evaluation of alternative designs which might result in lower heights. If additional height over that allowed in the zone is justified it may be approved by the City. The applicant shall include an analysis of the feasibility of future consolidated use of the proposed facility with other public utility facilitieso E- x.. '.r """::C- ht Cn 1 F ~."~._~ Page 3 of 8 P A G;: --~---- ~ ,-- (/ (.:.,' 0 -_.._"~~. ~~ ( Provided, that this subsection shaH not apply to utility facilities located on property which are accessory to the residential use of that property or to the transmission, distribution or collection lines and equipment necessary to provide a direct utility connection to the property or neighboring properties, or to those utility facilities located on public right-of-way, nor shall it apply to utility facilities installed within new subdivisions, which shall be evaluated prior to plat approval and do not require a separate conditional use permit. Section 7. LMC 2 1.46. JOO Amended. Section 21.46.100 of the Lynnwood Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: II r I ,"..'" :,':': .... ...: "on, :>: '::',:~;:\:}D::3:~~:~~~'~~ ~Z~~.;~.¡- ¡;'ß..í~ ::,~::,~~.i >(;1'3 ¡;,~::Mû'; , ...." "~'" '.....' ,,::..~,~:,L':~-""""""":~""':.'I ",' .., Olht:: Ult~. " . '"B-4" , ;'-:;ji"-' 'g."'r-~'JiÇQ " "or':: ",C-'l'; .' or.: ':(C.nr' , ".,' :BN"" , :> .~~.;,,~':""':'BC:..""..~,~',.: .CCì~ '>':" ,'1 , I fùr.dio or Television Stations. not including WU'c1css Communication Facility - - p p p p - - - C Recycling CoUection Cc:nten' - - - - Temporary Spccal Events. pr Ch;¡pter 5.~S WU'Cless Communication F;¡cility less th3n 300 fc:c( from residential zones (As me;lSurcd from the WU'c1css communication support structure to the property line of the nc;.;¡rcst rcsldentiaUy-zoned pareel) . WU'Cless Communication Facility 300 feet or more [rom residental zones (As mc.asurcd (rom the wireless communications support structure to the property line of the nc;.;¡rest residentially-zoned parcel) - - p p p C c p p C c - c C C SP p p p p p p p SP WU'Clcss Communic.ation FaciJity. An.a.:hed Key: P = A - C - AI = SP = = -X = CA = + = tblo<dlord (X} 817- 01/09/96 (t1n1 p p p p p p p p Permitted as principal use Permitted as accessory use with a principal use May be permitted as a principal use upon approval of a conditional use permit Permitted as accessory use if located in the building of a pennitted principal use, and internally oriented with principal public access through the main access of the building AlIowed by special use permit Not permitted Not permitted in controlled area Permitted only in controlled area. See Section 21.460120 See Section 21.46.110 - .119. Page 4 of 8 EXt-:t c..;~- r'__~ F: -~~~-~ PAC;:--,_~__~_4- Oç:~_~_L-= ( Section 8. LMC 21.46. J 19 Amended. Section 21.46.119 of the Lynnwood Municipal Code is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: c. Wireless Communication Facility A conditional use permit for a Wireless Communication Facility shall be subject to the following additional standards: Provided, that this subsection shall not apply to utility facilities located on a property which are accessory to the property or to the transmission, distribution EXH{ D~'1~ ç- PÅG¡':~ç;--_. 5. 6. 7. rblon!\O<d.OO4 8: 17am 01/09/9<> (rm) 1. Such facilities shall not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare; 2. The applicant shall demonstrate the need for the proposed tower (wireless communication support structure) to be located near a residential area, the procedures involved in the site selection and an evaluation of alternative sites aIld existing facilities on which the proposed facility could be located or co-located; 3. A site development plan shall be submitted showing the location, size, screening, and design of all buildings and structures, including fences, the location, size and nature of outdoor equipment, and the location, number, and species of all proposed landscaping; 4. The facility shall be designed to be aesthetically and architecturally compatible with the natural and build environment. This includes, but is not necessarily limited to, building design and the use of exterior materials harmonious with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and the use of landscaping and privacy screening to. buffer the facilities and activities on the site from surrounding properties. Any equipment or facilities not enclosed within a building (e.g., towers, transformers, tanks, etc.) shan be designed and located on the site to minimize adverse impacts on surrounding properties. All wireless communication facilities shall comply with national, $tate or local standards whichever is more restrictive, in effect at the time of application, for non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation; and The applicant shall demonstrate a justification for the proposed height of the structures and an evaluation of alternative designs which might result in lower heights. If additional height over that allowed in the zone is justified it may be approved by the City. The applicant shall include an analysis of the feasibility of future consolidated use of the proposed facility with other public utility facilities. Page 5 of 8 - .._-~-=. g . 'r . ~--~_. ..---= . ( or collection lines and equipment necessary to provide a direct utility connection. to the property or neighboring properties, or to those utility facilities located on public right-of-wayo Section 9. LMC 21.50.100 Amendedo The table in Section 21.50.100 is amended to include three new categories as follows: ,,;'::::,;";'::~';;}':';',~::\ ,;.:, ,:,:;'.:, ,. . ..:: :;;:::::.f ~)\t}:ti¡;;~.~,Ù,;<i~i~7~:~,~1..;~~~i.;~~;!'~~?~~;:;:';~)i~;;:;;~ ',;....""'" """¡'~:;11',.\, :;;ûf <nTP~ ~~'o' Freight Warehouse Terminals C C P Furniture Manufacture and Repair Shops C P P WU'Cleu Communication FacililY less than 300 fCd from residential zones (As C C C mc:uurcd from the wireless communication support structure to the property line of the nearest residentially-zoned parcel). WU'Cless CommunicalÍon Facility 300 fCd or more from residential zones (As P P P measured from the wireless communication support structure to the property line of the ncarest residcntiaUy.zoned parcel) WU'Cless Communication Facility. Attached p P P Key: P: Use is permitted as a primary use c: The use may be pennitted through issuance of a conditional use permil A: Use is permitted as an accessory conditional use: and must be rdated to the principal use of the tenant space or property A": These accessory condilionalaccessory uses may occupy no more than:!5% of the floor area . - ' Use is prohibited .. See Section::! 1.50.11 0 Section 10. LMC 11.50. I 10 Amended. Section 21.50.110 of the Lynnwood Municipal Code is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: G. Wireless ConunUnicatiOD Facility A conditional use pennit for a Wireless Communication Facility shall be subject to the following additional standards: 1. Such facilities shall not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare; 2. The appliC311t shall demonstrate the need for the proposed tower (wireless communication suppon structure) to be located near a residential area, the procedures involved in the site selection and an evaluation of alternative sites and existing facilities on which the proposed facility could be located or co-located; 3. A site development plan shall be submitted showing the location, size, screening, and design of all buildings and structures, including fences, the ~¿XH t C: '¡ '; - F PAGE~~___. (:~. Page 6 of 8 7 r b \onf\on . 004 8:17- 01/09/96~) ----r':. ( 70 location, size, and nature of outdoor equipment, and the location, number, and species of all proposed landscaping; 4. The facility shall be designed to be aesthetically and architecturally compatible with the natural and build environment. This includes, but is not necessarily limited to, building design and the use of exterior materials harmonious with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and the use of landscaping and privacy screening to buffer the facilities and activities on the site from surrounding properties. Any equipment or facilities not enclosed within a building (e.g., towers, transformers, tanks, etc.) shall be designed and located on the site to minimize adverse impacts on surrounding properties. 5. All wireless communication facilities shall comply -with national, state or local standards whichever is more restrictive, in effect at the time of application, for non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation; and 6. The applicant shall demonstrate a justification for the proposed height of the structures and an evaluation of alternative designs which might result in lower heights. If additional height over that allowed in the zone is justified it may be approved by the City. The applicant shall include an analysis of the feasibility of future consolidated use of the proposed facility with other public utility facilities. Provided, that this subsection shall not apply to utility facilities located on a property which are accessory to the property or to the transmission, distribution or collection lines and equipment necessary to provide a direct utility connection to the property or neighboring properties, or to those utility facilities located on public right-of-way. Section II. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinanceo Section 12. Effective Date. TIús Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force five (5) days after its passage, approval and publication. Cb\O<d\ord.OOI 8: 17.." 0110'1/96 ~) Page 7 of 8 E-=~X'H: :; '=~."T r- '-- ~ . '--", ¡ -- --- ~ PAGI= ~L Or: --~-= . PASSED this 8th day of January passage this ~ day of January, 1996. , 1996 and signed in authentication of its C52LGl~ TINA ROBERTS, MAYOR A TrEST: ~ . W. ACK, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~~.6 JOHN P. WAITS, City Attorney PUBLISHED: 1-/8- <1& C b \onI\ord . ~ 8:17- 01109196 (em) Page 8 of 8 EXHibi'r PAGE~B ~ ~--~ Oç ð" -~--= ~ CITY Of ~I:ffi~~ _L ~ ~¿¡Á¡ c' Jim White, Mayor February 28, 1997 Mr. Ken Nyberg, City Manager City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, W A 98003 Dear Mr. Nyberg: As an elected official, I have taken as a personal responsibility to learn as much about telecommunications issues as I can. On February 24, for example, I attended a conference in Seattle about the "Wireless Buildout", a conference for the Pacific Northwest. In attendance were city planners from all over, a few elected officials, and representatives of the wireless community. The conference was paid for in part by companies who act as service providers for both cities and the industry. -",.., , There are a number of perspectives I would likè to share with yoUo When I think "wireless", I think of cellular phones. The McCaw family springs to mind. ' I only~had part of that ,right. It seems that as Congress auctionedo.ffpartofthe'radio spectrum, they made a requirement that, in order to keep your license,' you had to, build out your system by the year 2000. Their purpose was to make the U.S. have in place a wireless communication system NOW! It ~eemsthat the bidders for these licenses are dQminantly producers of Personal Communications Services (PCS) which translates to "cellular phones". But, there is a difference between the technology of the McCaw's and these new PCS units. To the user, there is no difference. But, to the builder, there is a big one. The PCS units are digitally-based. Without getting technical, the significant point to cities is that they require rougWy twice as many towers or antennae locations as the older cell phone technology. Since the wireless license holders need locations immediately in order to keep their licenses, there are a number of issues which must be addressed. I. You cannot refuse to grant tower locations. You can restrict, but not refuse to grant any franchise. And whatever the rules and charges for that franchise, they must be the same for everybody. So, you will be "under the gun" soon, if not already, to grant a franchise (we are in a temporary moratorium to assure common codes). 2. One strategy is to restrict the areas where poles and towers can be locatedo But, they are tall. If you try to force co-location of carriers on one pole, frequently the towers must exceed 100 feet. And, they are "thick". It seems that both cellular and CRS units must transmit over coaxial wire, so each transmitter requires thick bundles of wire to connect. Put three carriers on one pole and you have a thick tower probably 120 feet tall. E" Xf-j~ ~~'~~.T ß - . .-' '., --- - - ,'.'. PAGe I \,..; - - ç;- - --:- 220 ~,h AVE, SO.. I KENT. WASHINGTON 9~OJ2-5X951 TELEPHONE t206)X59.JJOO I FAX # 859.JJJ4 ; ,) I ~ I:;' J-i/J ./ I ' ; ¡ ,;n' v RESOLUTION NO. .. :,,1 ::,j LJ LJ - A RESOLUTION of the City of Washington, establishing a policy that recognizes the need for regional planning of certain wireless technology concerns and authorizing staff to meet with other South County jurisdictions to develop a regional master plan to regulate the development and construction of wireless telecom- munications facilities. WHEREAS, recent changes in wireless communications technology have created a new competitive private business market aimed at providing various fonus of wireless telephone service to the citizens of region; and and the greater South County WHEREAS, businesses trying to capitalize on this new technology and the market forces that the technology is affecting have been and continue to submit an unprecedented number of land use and development applications to establish wireless telecommunications facilities within the City's corporate limits; and WHEREAS, many of these facilities involve the construction of antenna' towers ranging from sixty to one hundred fifty feet in height; and 1 EXH~8jT Q -'---"'-,--=- PAGE q(.. , ~'{'-_o 5 . -~ .i . WHEREAS, the exact location of these antennas is detennined in part by the number and location of other antennas in the area that are linked to the system each antenna is established to serve; and WHEREAS, in order to provide absolute coverage, without any blackout areas, some of these antennas may need to be erected in residential neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, in order to preserve the existing character of neighborhood residential communities, the City must take all appropriate steps to reduce the impacts caused by these wireless telecommunication facilities on those residential neighborhoods, by means such as use of existing facilities, co-location on towers, reduced tower heights or height restrictions, etc.; and WHEREAS, because of their height and location, these antennas and other facilities, without appropriate land use and development controls, can impact the character, nature, and aesthetics of local neighborhoods and communities; and WHEREAS, because of the unprecedented number of development pennit applications that the City has received, it is appropriate that the City review, analyze, and determine the appropriate land use and development regulations for the siting of these wireless telecommunications facilities; and WHEREAS, it is additionally appropriate that City staff coordinate its efforts with the efforts being taken by other communities in the South County region so that all cities, working together, can develop a consistent master plan for the siting, development, and construction of these wireless telecommunications facilities so as to provide a predictable framework for the cities, their residents, and the various telecommunications providers. 2 EX~ qff""\~~ J-r~ ~ ~~;; ~ G -.--...,,-.----.., PAGE 3 u t.' S- - - , -- . - . --d¡. ., , THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals and findings are incorporated into the body of this resolution as if fully stated herein. technology developments m the wireless SECTION 2: New telecommunications industry present new challenges to the City of . It is appropriate that the City review and understand the impact of this technology on our community and our citizens. SECTION 3: Without appropriate land use and development controls, the siting of wireless telephone facilities, specifically including towers, poses a serious threat to the public health, safety and welfare, particularly within residential areas. Accordingly, it . is appropritate to consider all means and methods available that would achieve the goal of reducing impacts on residential neighborhoods, such as using existing facilities, co-locating facilities, and establishing height limitations. SECTION 4: Because the telecommunications business providers constructing these facilities site their communication facilities on a regional rather than individual city basis, it is appropriate that the City of coordinate its efforts with other South County cities to develop an effective' regional master plan that provides consistent and thorough regulation of these facilities throughout the South County region. SECTION 5: City staff are hereby directed to assist with the development of a regional South County planning group including the cities of Kent, Tukwila, Auburn, Federal Way, Renton, SeaTac and Des Moines. The purpose of this regional planning group shall be to keep fully informed of the various wireless telecommunications developments that occur in each city and to develop the aforementioned regional master plan. Finally, a 3 E)/'-,õ ; F.' ';- . ' ,,' ~: p' . PAGe L{- c -'- -- Ur' 5 ,- -, .~ specific staff person shall be designated as a regional contact person to coordinate and develop this plan. Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Washington this - day of ,1996. Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of ,1997 , this - day of ,MAYOR ATTEST: , CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: , CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. , passed by the City Council of the City of , Washington, the - day of ,1997. (SEAL ) , CITY CLERK P:\LA W\RESOlUT!\CITY.RES 4 EX~...! ~ F r~ . ¡ J ¡' :-:-:', :' b -.- ~_... \,.., ,.~--..-~ -~ PAGE IJ -_. ... -. JANUARY 1991 Awe Telecom . - " ' - '-'. - "" - - . , ' Advisory Association of Washington Cities 1016 Franklin Street SE Olympia. WA 98501-1346 Develop A Wireless, Communications Ordinance Cities are receiving numerous requests from wireless communications providers for permits that would allow tower construction. Cities need to adopt a wireless communi- cations ordinance to manage the placement. construction. and modification of personal wireless service facilities. For more information. call Victoria Lincoln at AWC. (360) 153-4131. ~ ~ }.~: II ~ ~'~Æ -. ~:!\~' !-'-'~:;. .- ,-'- . , -' '. /{fìi; '-~ I '.,e,"i.. ,,"\= :: \ :ßf ' . :::,~.\~11:' ~1\ - -- ,.~"'e".~e."- '--'I - " ;!.~~\."ì!\~ ß -r~,,~~~-~\ Personal communication services (PCS) are digital wireless telephone technology such as portable phones, pages, faxes and computers. With this mobile technology, consumers will be able to use the same telephone number wherever they go. Before the emergence ofPCS technology, most people identified the wireless telephone industry with cellular telephone services. Personal communications services opens up another avenue of opportunity for providers and local government. Companies are spending millions of dollars simply to have the right (via an FCC auction) to provide PCS service. Eventually three to six PCS providers will be located in a metropolitan market, in addition to cellular telephone companies. Industry providers throughout the country are already placing their facilities on both public and private property, and activating their networks. r-..- /'~ ~. 8 'T ~- r ',f"; r s \ )-, I C-')f~'. ,J - -~~ d ~~_. '~-,~ t I""" ~. \. ¡:-' d <I U -.-' """ What does a wireless communications ordinance do? . Provides specific regulations for the placement, construction and modification of personal wireless telecommunications facilities. . Makes sure that the regulations do not have the effect of prohibiting the provision of wireless services. . Reiterates that wireless telephone facilities may include, for example, antennas, towers, equipment cabinets and other related structures. . Applies the regulations so that they do not unreasonably discriminate between providers of functionally equivalent services. . Supplements the provisions of your existing city code or zoning ordinances. The federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 preserved the rights of local governments to regulate the placement, construction and modification of personal wireless service facilities. Contrary to the objections of several industry providers, Congress preserved the rights of local governments to retain their local zoning authority regarding tower placement. However, a local government cannot unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services, or prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services. It was Congress' intent that local governments not create artificial barriers to entry for the wireless telephone industry. However, Congress also intended to preserve local governments' right to oversee the placement of wireless telephone service facilities (such as towers) to maintain comprehensive and workable zoning standards. A local government needs to act on a request for authorization to place, construct, or modify personal wireless service facilities within a reasonable period oftime, taking into account the nature and scope of the request. A denial of a request must be in writing and supported by substantial evidence which is to be contained in a written recordo The 1996 Act does contain restrictions upon the authority of a local government to regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities. These restrictions are based on the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions if those facilities already comply with the FCC's regulations concerning such emissions. A denial of a request must be in writing and supported by substantial evidence which is to be contained. in a written record. 2 ~ ~.=,1 7 ¡ J\\,-.L:-=- ~OF --=c.... f'r"-.r~giT.. AWC TELECOM ADVISORY Consider the following items in drafting your personal wireless service facilities ordinance: . Definitions - The ordinance will need to contain a list of definitions which addresses matters such as antennas, antenna support structures, cell sites and towers. . The document could contain an overall statement of policy regarding siting requests which are being received by the city council. Some ordinances have included statements of policy which address items such as encouraging the location of towers in nonresidential areas. Another community goal may be to minimize the proliferation of towers by encouraging the use of new and existing tower sites (co location). Adverse visual impacts upon a community need to be minimized. At the same time, the ordinance needs to have the requisite flexibility to encourage providers to offer wireless services throughout the city quickly and efficiently. Communications providers will need multiple sites for coverage if they are to create an effective and workable wireless telecommunications network. It will also be important for the providers to protect residential areas from adverse impactso . Industry site selection criteria need to be taken into considerationo Industry providers will need to find locations which will fit within their grid system as far as topography and placement are concerned. They will need to have suitable ingress and egress to and from their facilities and have electric power available for their equipment. The providers should also provide adequate screening and landscaping to satisfy aesthetic concerns of citizens in the community. . Industry providers should be required to demonstrate that their facilities must be placed in a proposed location in order to satisfy their grid system. The companies should demonstrate by technological evidence that the height of the facilities they are requesting is the minimum height necessary to fulfill the cell site's function. continued Things to think about ... Each municipality needs to carefully assess its own unique circumstances. Municipal officials' opinions may differ on the placement of wireless communications facilities. . Does the local government want to encourage providers to use public or private property for the placement of their facilities? . What sort of compensation is the local government interested in receiving if the facilities are placed on public property? . Should colocation be encouraged among the providers? . What sort of aesthetic considerations are important in your particular jurisdiction? 3 rwC1~t~"'ADVISORY (~ "~,~ 0'- " I ~ C. Ir= 1 r'[',,~,,=,-- ~-' f' -., -"""--,,c,~ . The providers should be prepared to demonstrate that the towers and antennas they are constructing are not being built on a speculative basis, but instead are immediately needed for the proper functioning of their system. . Remedies need to be included in the model wireless communications ordinance in the event of noncompliance. Those remedies need to be cumulative and could include, subject to applicable law, damages or injunctive relief. . A severability clause should be included in the document in the event that any part of it is later found to be invalid by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction. Talk to other cities ... How have they deployed wireless communications facilities? Meet with your city or town attorney... Ask them to research federal and state law, and draft the provisions which best meet your particular needs. (During the 1996 legislative session, Washington adopted provisions pertaining to wireless communications, including applications which relate to the siting of certain personal wireless service facilities.) Start drafting your ordinance now so that you are prepared to handle applications from the wireless industry. 4 ¡"~, . ~ ,~. ~ ~. -.. (.; i' '. i» ~ J --_J'~)::.n"" . L, ,....' ¿¡ I.~:',~ '7 .1 b'\.....'L.,..~.=~~,.J¡ =._~. AWC TELECOM ADVISORY . What else do cities need to consider? Colocation of equipment and facilities is highly desirable from a community standpoint. If competitors in the wireless communications industry are willing to co locate onto existing and new facilities, this decreases the towers which would remain as stand-alone facilities. Industry providers are often reluctant to co locate for two reasons: They do not want to give a competitive advantage to another entrant into the marketplaceo And, they have a concern regarding possible frequency interference. Other communities have found that co location can benefit both the providers and local governments. Co location allows industry providers to more quickly deploy their equipment and actually put their wireless communications service network into operation faster and with a cost savings. From the local government's perspective, co location has aesthetic advantages. Design criteria need to be carefully addressed by each jurisdiction. '. What will be the setback requirement in a particular zoning district? What color should the communications towers be so that they are less noticeable? Will the towers require signals or lights? Municipalities also need to be aware that antenna facilities of wireless communications providers need ancillary equipment. These equipment cabinets can vary in size and dimension. Adequate provisions in the ordinance need to be included to provide for landscaping or fencing of the ancillary buildings or equipment. Wireless facilities need to be in compliance with all federal. state and local requirements. The facilities need to be structurally capable for their intended purposes. Adequate safety measures need to be taken. Antenna criteria varies from one community to another. Some communities encourage providers to place their antennas flush on the wall of a building and not project above the roof. Other jurisdictions allow industry providers to extend a certain number of feet above the rooftop of a building, dependent upon the zoning district. The equipment should be designed to make it compatible with surrounding buildings and uses, Existing vegetation and topography should be preserved to the maximum extent possible. 5 i~CTE~~il.~DVISORY () ~"'~"'~"'-'? ~ v~'or'~-- - ~. - C) ~.~.~ 7. Where to find more info ... Where can cities find out more about wireless communi- cations services? The Municipal Research and Services Center's web page contains several examples of ordinances and agreements: (http://www.mrsc.org) The visual appearance of historic districts needs to be protected. Requests for antenna or tower placement in such areas should be very carefully monitored. Interference caused by the facilities of a wireless communications provider should not be allowed. The provider should be responsible for the elimination of all interference with any other communications signals. Local governments should maintain the right to inspect the facilities of the wireless communications providers. Landscaping should be required to screen as much of the support structure as is reasonably possible. If the industry providers and the cities work together, positive steps can be taken to minimize the adverse visual impact of PCS facilities. To adequately monitor the placement and types of wireless facilities within the boundaries of a city or town, detailed application requirements need to be contained in the model wireless communications facilities ordinance. The application could include: . A site plan, which clearly delineates the location, type and height of the proposed tower. . Area maps showing the location of the proposed facilities. . A description of the parcel. . A landscape plan. . Fencing describing in detail the color and type of materials to be used. . A certification of the applicant that the tower will comply with all applicable federal, state and local standards and regulations. . Whether the tower can accommodate colocation of additional antennas. 6 ¡-~ þ~ ",,~,'T ",.,.. 1 '! ¡:' " -It- AWC TELECOM ADVISORY -'--""-'-"-~.- I ~ h\,-.~ (2 OF 1 - ~~c..,-.o ~ . A statement by the telecommunications company that it holds a valid license as required by state or federal law. . A description of how the proposed site fits into the applicant's overall network. . All other materials necessary for the city to properly evaluate the applicant's request. Communities in Washington and elsewhere have considered or actually adopted a moratorium for a finite amount of time to allow themselves to address the complexities raised by the placement of personal wireless service facilities. For example, Medina adopted a six-month moratorium on the issuance of permits for additional wireless communications facilities. That moratorium was challenged by Sprint Spectrum, LP., in federal district Court in Seattle. The court indicated the moratorium which w~ adopted by Medina suspended the issuance of permits and not the processing of applications. Further, the court said Medina was trying to act in a careful !TIanner and give itself time to gather information. If your community is considering adopting a moratorium, it is very important that you consult with your city or town attorney and carefully review the 1996 Act, the court's decision in the Medina case and other relevant federal and state legislationo A moratorium, regardless of how it is structured, may lead to litigation. About the Author Bob Duchen, vice president of River Oaks Communications Corporation, is a frequent speaker at city and county seminars on the subject of telecommunications. If you have questions, he can be reached at telephone number (303) 721-0653 or fax number (303) 721-1746. 7 'rC; ;rE)i~TrVISOR~ C~ ~:h\.J;E_____] OF ~-:]~ 7-- CITY OF II' - -- ~- I:C~ ~~~ DATE: April 30, 1997 TO: Phil Watkins, Chair Land Use/Transportation Committee Jeff Pratt, Surface Water Manager~ So 356th Regional Storm Water Control Facility - Bid Award FROM: SUBJECT: Background: On April 24, 1997, the City received fourteen bids from various contractors for the above referenced project. The low-bid contractor for this project is Porter Brothers Construction, Inc., with a total bid amount of $1,738,701.47. This bid amount is 7% lower than the average bid of the next three lowest bidders combined and $4,172.00 less than the engineer's estimated construction cost for this project (see attached bid tabulations). Based on the reference checks completed by the City's Surface Water Management division and KCM, Inc., the City's design contractor on this project, there is no known reason why this low bidder should not be able to successfully complete this project. The project budget status is as follows: Council Authorized Budget $3,291,923.00* Estimated Project Costs $3,576,753.00 Estimated Project Shortfall $ 284,830.00 *This amount includes $717,000.00 contn'buted toward the project by WDOT as part of a joint venture to provide stann water quality and quantity control for their SR161 improvements. Estimated project cost includes the following: Design $ 204,727.00 Acq uisition $1,189,455.00 Construction: Underground Utility Conversion Construction Management Construction $ 120,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $1,912,571.00 (includes 10% contingency) Total Costs $3,576,753.00 The estimated project shortfall is a result of a settlement agreement reached between the City and Everspring, Inc., during the property acquisition phase of the project. The estimated costs of the Everspring parcel's acquisition was exceeded by the actual settlement price by $335,487.00. Note that in order to proceed with construction of this project a Council approved budget adjustment in the amount of $284,830.00 will be necessary. Recommendations: Staff recommends that the project budget be amended by a budget increase in the amount of $284,830.00. Staff recommends the award of this project to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Porter Brothers Construction, Inc., in the amount of $1,738,701.47, and that a 10% construction contingency totaling $173,870.15 be established for the project. Staff recommends that this matter be placed on the May 6, 1997 City Council meeting business agenda for their consideration. Attachment: Bid Tabulations K:\LUTC\S356RSFB.WPD Bid Tabulation "RFB 97-100" BID OPENING APRIL 24, 1997 South 356th Street Regional Storage Facility and Stream Rehabilitation Project tJ/d 1 Il;ld L. Ijld3 Il;ld 4 Vendor Name ---> PORTER BROTHER CONC NORTHWEST CaNST.. INC STAN PALMER CONST,INC. ~ W SCOTT CONST, INC Location ----------> DesMoines ~eattle Silverdale Renton - Item Amount Price Total Price Total Price Total 1 Temporary Water Pollution/Erosion 1 8,000.00 8,000.00 8.000.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 8.000.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 2 Silt Fence 645 5.28 3,403.02 5.00 3,225.00 2.00 1.290.00 6.00 3,870.00 3 Mobilization 1 49,585.00 49,585.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 144,000.00 144,000.00 140.000.00 140,000.00 4 Clearing and Grubbing 4.5 527.51 2.373.77 2,000.00 9,000.00 6,622.00 29,799.00 3,125.00 . 14,062.50 5 Removal of Structure and Obstructio 1 5,275.00 5,275.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 13.800.00 13,800.00 29,000.00 29,000.00 6 Unsuitable Foundation Excalnc. Haul 900 6.86 6,174.00 10.00 9,000.00 24.00 21,600.00 15.00 13,500.00 7 Gravel Borrow Incl. Haul 1665 10.02 16.679.97 10.00 16,650.00 8.15 13,569.75 11.00 18,315.00 8 Unclassified Excavation 1 353.214.00 353,214.00 350.000.00 350,000.00 297,789.00 297,789.00 434,124.00 434,124.00 9 Bottom Treatment Type A 10020 11.46 114,869.28 2.50 25,050.00 6.50 65.130.00 11.00 110,220.00 10 Slope Treatment Type A 2090 6.49 13.568.28 15.00 31,350.00 45.00 94,050.00 15.00 31,350.00 11 Shoring or Extra Excavation CI. B 55390 0:53 29.079.75 0.15 8,308.50 1.00 55,390.00 0.65 36,003.50 12 Dike Ditch 282 5.28 1,487.83 10.00 2,820.00 6.50 1,833.00 12.00 3,384.00 13 Shoulder Ditch 260 10.55 2,743.52 10.00 2,600.00 12.00 3,120.00 13.00 3,380.00 14 Site Remediation 1 25,000.00 25.000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 15 Temporary Pavement Patching 190 15.82 3,005.80 20.00 3,800.00 10.75 2,042.50 13.00 2,470.00 16 Asphalt Concrete Patching 190 23.74 4,510.22 20.00 3,800.00 15.00 2,850.00 33.00 6,270.00 17 Gabion Cribbing 1900 100.22 190,419.90 110.00 209,000.00 95.00 180.500.00 115.00 218,500.00 18 Trench Foundation Stabilization 220 12.66 2,785.42 20.00 4,400.00 19.00 4.180.00 15.00 3,300.00 19 CI. IV Reinf. Conc. Pipe 121n. Oiam. 72 24.88 1,791.36 46.50 3,348.00 28.00 2,016.00 31.00 2,232.00 20 CI. IV Reinf. Conc. Pipe 24 In. Oiam. 137 44.76 6,132.12 67.00 9,179.00 33.00 4,521.00 33.00 4,521.00 21 CI. IV Reinf. Conc. Pipe 42 In. Diam. 1060 122.55 129.904.06 152.00 161.120.00 145.00 153.700.00 122.00 129,320.00 22 CI. V Reinf. Conc. Pipe 42 In. Diam. 408 169.89 69.315.12 196.00 79.968.00 220.00 89,760.00 145.00 59.160.00 23 CI. IV Reinf. Conc. Pipe 48 In. Diam. 604 137.03 82,763.70 160.00 96,640.00 139.00 83,956.00 126.00 76,104.00 24 CI. IV Reinf. Conc. Pipe 60 In. Diam. 13 208.61 2,711.93 218.00 2,834.00 450.00 5,850.00 255.00 3.315.00 25 Connect to Existing Manhole 2 3,376.00 6,752.01 750.00 1.500.00 3,200.00 6,400.00 500.00 1,000.00 26 Manhole Under 12 Ft. 72 In. Diam 2 6,711.91 13.423.81 4,000.00 8,000.00 5,875.00 11.750.00 4,000.00 8,000.00 27 Manhole Under 12 Ft. 96 In. Diam 2 10,171.25 20,342.50 5,000.00 10,000.00 9,465.00 18.930.00 11,000.00 22,000.00 28 Manhole Under 12 to 20 Ft. 72 In. Di 3 8,756.50 26.269.50 2,500.00 7.500.00 10,500.00 31,500.00 5,668.00 17 ,004.00 29 Manhole Under 12 to 20 Ft. 96 In. Di 4 13,841.60 55,366.41 7,100.00 28,400.00 12.200.00 48,800.00 9,400.00 37.600.00 30 Outlet Structure 1 36,503.00 36.503.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 12.750.00 12.750.00 31 Topsoil Type B 1970 4.75 9,359.47 4.00 7,880.00 6.25 12,312.50 12.00 23,640.00 '.! ~ding and Establish. Type 1 0.8 1,086.64 869.31 1,030.00 824.00 1,475.00 1,180.00 1,092.00 873.60 3, .eding and Establish. Type 2 1.7 22,408.20 38,093.95 18,740.00 31,858.00 19;000.00 32,300.00 19,864.00 33,768.80 34 Straw Blanket Mulch 5000 1.11 5,525.00 1.05 5,250.00 1.10 5,500.00 1.15 5.750.00 35 Soil Amendment 708 4.95 3,507.43 4.70 3,327.60 5.00 3,540.00 5.17 3,660.36 36 Soil Guard 570 5.01 2,855.13 2.00 1,140.00 2.00 1,140.00 2.15 ,1.225.50 37 Landscaping-Detention Pond Area 1 50,022.82 50,022.82 47,415.00 47,415.00 48,000.00 48,000.00 49,800.00 49,800.00 38 Landscaping-Stream Rehabilitation 1 18,705.15 18,705.15 17,730.00 17,730.00 17,000.00 17,000.00 18,700.00 18,700.00 39 Chain Link Fence Type 3 1184 7.65 9,059.97 8.75 10,360.00 8.00 9,472.00 9.50 11,248.00 40 Double 20 Ft Chain Link Gate 1 804.96 804.96 800.00 800.00 750.00 750.00 715.00 715.00 41 Streambank Protec.-Left Bank 60 68.57 4,114.38 26.00 1,560.00 92.00 5,520.00 60.00 3,600.00 42 Streambank Prot.-Left & Right Bank 75 94.95 7,121.55 37.00 2,775.00 87.00 6,525.00 100.00 7,500.00 43 Channel Weirs 4 791.25 3,165.01 1,000.00 4,000.00 1,890.00 7,560.00 1,500.00 6,000.00 44 Emergency Overtlow Spillway 1 21.311.00 21,311.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 45 Outlet Protection 62 56.97 3,532.20 120.00 7.440.00 60.00 3,720.00 113.00 7,006.00 46 Gravel Filter Window 2 3,165.00 6,330.00 ' 2,250.00 4,500.00 3,625.00 7,250.00 ' 4,200.00 8,400.00 47 Sedimentation Forebay 440 14.77 6,498.80 10.50 4.620.00 18.00 7,920.00 20.00 8,800.00 48 Access Road 2660 21.79 57,950.76 21.00 55,860.00 22.00 58,520.00 26.00 69,160.00 49 Channel Protection 42 12.66 531.76 15.00 630.00 5.85 245.70 18.00 756.00 50 OillWater Separator & Div. Manhole 1 60.778.55 60,778.55 62,000.00 62,000.00 53,000.00 53,000.00 56,700.00 56,700.00 51 Asphalt Overlay 823 9.02 7,426.75 12.00 9,876.00 10.00 8,230.00 13.00 10,699.00 SUBTOTAL ,6l2,1S;;!IS.lU l,f;;!IS,;;!l .4~ I,OIC,f~f.'D Sales Tax @ 8.6% 137,687.23 138,704.08 149,494.78 156,241.12 TOTAL ,fJIS,fU1.4 f 1 ,f~l,542.l I! l,OOf.OUO."" ,972,991S.;;!1! Il;ld ~Iona ure SIGned signed signed siGned IBid Bond yes ves ves yes IAddendums yes yes yes yes ~IO 1U 11:>1011 tJlO 1L 11:>1<] 1.j 1:>1014 UCCI & SONS. INC. GARY MERLINO CaNST CO. fNestwater Construction Co. OLSON BROTHER EXCA YDICO. INC ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE T' l Seattle Auburn PuvaliuP Maple Valley , ,Ice Tot31 Price Total Price Total Price otal Price alai Price Total 8,0.0.0.00 8,00000 8,0.00.00 8,000.00 8.000.0.0. 8.0.00.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 8,000..00 8,00000 8,000.00 8,000.00 600 3,870.0.0. 3.00 1.935.00 7.00 4,5150.0. 5.00 3,225.00 7.00 4,515.00 2.00 1,290.00 147.000.00 147.00000 50.000..00 50,000.00 178,000.00 178,000..00 100.000.00 100,000.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 104,119.00 10.4,119.00 3 500.00 15,750.00 4,500.00 20.,250..00 7,0.0000 31,500 00 8,000.00 36,000.00 10.,000.00 45,000.00 3,0.0000 13,500.00 23000.00 23,000.00 1 00, 000. 00 100,00000 10..0000.0. 10,000.00 50.,00000 50,00000 100,000.00 100,00000 10.,000.00 10.,000.00 23.50. 21.150..0.0. 8.00 7,200.00 1000 9,00000 20..00 18,000.00 30..00 27,000.00 8.00 7,200.00 6.60. 10.,9890.0. 700 11,6550.:; 1000 16,65000 18.0.0. 29,970..00 15.00 24,97500 10..00 16,650.00 514.000.00 514000.00 582.50000 582,5000.' 736.000.00 736,000.00 55.00000 55,000.00 539,OOd.00 539,000.00 313,00000 313,000.00 6.70. 67,134.00 3.00 3D,O6DG,' 8.00 80.,160.00 18.00 180,360.00 4.00 40,080.00 9.00 90.,180.,00 6.40. 13,376.00 3.00 6.27000 12.0.0. 25,0.8000 25.00 52,250.00 5.00 10..45000 38.00 79.420..00 i 0..25 13.84750 0..10. 5})J9.00 0..25 13.84750 0..50 27,695.00 0..50 27.69500 0..15 8,308.50 1330. 3,750..60 7.50 2,115.00 100.0. 2.820.00 100.00 28,200.00 20..00 5,640..00 10..00 2,820..00 2600 6,760..00 14,00 3,640..00 14.00 3,640..00 75.00 19,500.00 20..00 5,200.00 17.00 4,420..00 25.00000 25,00000 25,00000 25,000.00 25,000.0.0. 25,00000 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25.00000 25,000.00 25,000.00 21.30. 4,0.47.00 25.00 4.75000 500 950..00 100.00 19,000.00 5.00 950.00 5.00 950.00 57.50. 10..925.00 3D. 00 5,700.00 20..00 3,80000 120..00 22.BOO.00 15.00 2,85000 14.0.0. 2,660.00 120..00 228,000..00 90..00 171,000..00 75.0.0. 142.500.00 10000 1 90, 000 . 00 105.00 199,500.00 125.00 237,500.00 24.00 5,280.00 25.00 5.50000 10..00 2,20.0.00 20..00 4,400.00 50.00 11,00000 8.0.0. 1,760.00 33.50. 2.412.00 55.00 3,960..00 65.00 4,680..00 3D. 00 2,160..00 60..00 4.320..00 30..00 2,160..00 127.00 17,399.00 85.00 11,645.00 100.00 13,70000 48.00 6,576.00 70..00 9,590.00 51.00 6,987.00 162.00 171,720..0.0. 200.00 212,000.00 135.00 143,100.00 92.00 97,520..00 140..00 148,400.00 100.00 1 06, 000 . 00 217.00 88,536.00 325.00 132,600.00 140..00 57,120..00 106.00 43,248.00 150.00 61,200.00 110..00 44,880.00 18300 110.,532.00 210..00 126,840..0.0. 160.00 96,640.00 110..00 66,440..00 160.00 96,640..00 10.8.00 65,232.00 190.00 2,470..00 350.00 4,550..00 170..00 2,210..00 156.00 2,028.00 1,000.00 13,00000 165.00 2,145,00 2.800.00 5,600.00 500.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 4,00000 2,000.00 4,000.00 3,000.00 6,000.00 250..00 500.00 3.D3D.00 6,060..00 5.500.00 11.00000 5.000.00 10.,00000 6.000.00 12,000.00 20.,00000 40.000.00 4,000.00 8,000.00 5.830..00 11,660.00 10.,000.00 20..000.00 7,0.00.00 14.000.00 7,500.00 15,000.00 25,000,00 50,000.00 7,000.00 14,000.00 3,950.00 11,850.00 7.000.00 21,000.00 6.800.00 20.,40000 8.500,00 25,500.00 25,000.00 75,000.00 7,000,00 21,000,00 10..000.00 40.,00000 12,500.00 50, 000 . 00 8,000.00 32.00000 10.,000.00 40.,000.00 30.,000.00 120.,000.00 11,000.00 44,000.00 48.350.00 48,350..00 25,000.00 25,000.00 35.000.00 35,000.00 ?5,ooo.00 25,000.00 70.,000.00 70.,000.00 20.,000.00 20.,000.00 6.25 12,312.50. 12.00 23,640..00 18.00 35,460..00 20..00 39,400.00 23.00 45,310..00 9.00 17,73D.00 U5D.00 1,40.0..00 1,800.00 1,440..00 1,600.0.0. 1,280.00 2.000.00 1 , 600. 00 1,000.00 BOO.oo 1,200.00 960.00 24.100.00 40.,970..00 25.000.00 42,50000 1.400.00 2,380..00 1,500.00 2,550.00 16,000.00 27,200.00 1,700.00 2,890.00 1.40. 7,000.00 1.50. 7,500.00 1.50. 7,5000.0. 5.00 25,000.00 2.00 10.,000.00 1.00 5,000.00 18.50 13,0.98.00 19.00 13,452.00 4.00 2,832.00 10..00 7,0.80..00 5.00 3.540..00 4.50. 3,186,00 0..75 427.50. 1.00 570..00 2.00 1,140..00 5.00 2,850.00 5.00 2,850.00 4.00 2,280..00 0..00 43,620..00 45,000.00 45,000.00 68,0.00.00 68,0.00.00 50.,000.00 50.,000.00 80.,000.00 80,000,00 43,900.00 43,900.00 "30..0.0. 14,630..00 15.000.00 15.000.00 25,00000 25.00000 30..000,00 30.,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 15,500.00 15,500.00 11.00 13,0.24.00 9.00 10.,656.00 10..00 11,840..00 20..00 23,680..00 23,00 27.232.00 12.00 14,20.8.00 750..00 750..00 700.00 700.00 700.00 700.0.0. 1,800.00 1,BOO.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.0.0. 1 , 000 . 00 25.50 1,530..00 40..00 2,400.00 45.00 2.70000 500.00 30.,000.00 35.00 2,100.00 37.00 2,220.00 36.25 2,718.75 60..00 4,500.G1 65.00 4,875.00 500.00 37,500.00 70..00 5,250.00 78,00 5,850.00 950..00 3,800.00 1 ,000. 00 4,000.[.: 1, 000 00 4,0.0.0.00 1,000.00 4,000.00 2,000.00 8,000.00 2,200.00 8,800.00 11.400.0.0. 11,400.00 15,000.00 15,000..00 14,000..00 14,00000 28.000.00 28.000.00 10.,00000 10,000.00 10.,000.00 10.,000.00 65.00 4,0.30..0.0. 80..00 4.0;60..00 3D. 00 1,860. 00 200.00 12,400.00 50.00 3,100.00 60..00 3,720..00 4,300.0.0. 8,600.0.0. 4,000.00 8,0000.0. 1,50.0..00 3,000.00 12,00000 24,000.00 2,000.00 4.00000 2,000.00 4,000.00 30..00 13,200.00 15.00 6,600.00 14.0.0. 6,160..00 60.00 26,400.00 10..00 4,400.00 22.00 9,680.00 41.25 10.9,725.00 30..00 79,8000.0. 2500 66,50.0..00 150..00 399,000.00 15.00 39,900.00 30..00 79,800.00 2500 1.0.50..00 15.00 630.,0.0. '16.00 67200 300.00 12.600.00 20..00 840..00 18.00 756.00 8240000 82,40000 85,000.00 85,000.00 65,000.00 65,000..00 75.000.00 75,000.00 65,000.00 65,000.00 99,350.00 99,350.00 6.70. 5,514.10. 15.00 12,345.0.0. 10.00 8,230..00 6000 49.380..00 9.0.0. 7,40.7.00 1500 12,345.00 L.Uå.t>t>I.~: L.U44,4L :.00 u:>~,t>4'i.:xJ ! L,U~l IL.OO . 174,551.44 175,818.57 177,129.17 179,835.63 20.1,578.32 138 0.17.66 L.LU4: :1~..j~ L,L.jo, fU.bl r4:l.1J/4.1ö signee signee sIgnee I sIgnee slgnea yes yes I yes I yes I yes yes yes I yes I yes I yes CITY OF .. :--: E1::J~ ~~ FlY' DATE: April 28, 1997 TO: Phil Watkins, Chair Land Use/Transportation Committee ~~ FROM: Ken Miller, Street Systems Manager SUBJECT: 21st Ave SWal SW 325th Place Traffic Signal & Intersection Improvement Project - 100% Design Approval and Authorization to Bid Background The design of the 21st Avenue SW at SW 325th Place Traffic Signal and Intersection Improvement Project is 100% complete. This project will install a new traffic signal at SW 325th Place, a turn lane at SW 326th Street, a turn lane at SW 328th Street, street lighting, utility relocation, and installation of a signal interconnect from SW 320th Street to SW 336th Street. Staff is currently working on acquiring two parcels for this project. Offers have been made and will be presented for approval by the City Council at Executive Session when complete. It is anticipated that the project will be bid in June, 1997. To complete the project as presented, including the additional turn lanes for SW 326th and SW 328th Streets, and the signal interconnect from SW 320th to SW 336th Street, an additional $259,000 is needed. Below are estimated project costs: Budget Available $497,000. DesignCosts .........................100,000. Right of Way ..........................18,000. Construction estimate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 460,000. 10% contingency ........................46,000. Signal Interconnect .......................55,000. Construction Administration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73,000. Advertising, printing, misc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,000. Total Estimate Project Cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $756,000. There is approximately $150,000 in bond project savings from completed projects that could be transferred to this project. Staff recommends $55,000 be transferred from the unencumbered funds in the traffic interconnect account and $54,000 from the unencumbered street bond issue funds. Staff will present the 100% design plans at the May 5, 1997 Land Use/Transportation Committee meeting. Recommendation Staff requests the Committee forward the following recommendations to the May 6, 1997 Council meeting for approval: 1) Approve the final design of the 21st Ave SWat SW 325th Place Traffic Signal and Intersection Improvement Project; 2) Approve transferring $150,000 in bond project savings into this project, $55,000 from the unencumbered funds in the traffic interconnect account to this project, and $54,000 from the unencumbered street bond issue funds. 3) Authorize staff to bid the project and proceed with the low bid directly to Council if within budget. k:lstrcet.slprojects\2lsw32511 OO%.des DATE: April 28, 1997 TO: Phil Watkins, Chair Land Use/Transportation Committee ~ FROM: Ken Miller, Street Systems Manager SUBJECT: SW Dash Point Road at 21st Avenue SW Traffic Signal and Intersection Improvements - 100% Design Approval and Authorization to Bid Background The design is 100% complete for the SW Dash Point Road at 21st Avenue SW Traffic Signal and Intersection Project. This project will install a traffic signal to allow left turns, provide a signalized driveway into Lakota Park, improve the right hand turn lane onto Dash Point Road, install street lighting, and improve sight distance. Right of way acquisition includes one parcel which will be presented to the City Council in Executive Session when complete. The 100% design plans will be presented at the May 5, 1997 Land Use/Transportation Committee meeting. Staff anticipates bidding the project in June or July, 1997 depending on the right of way acquisition. Recommendation Staff requests the Committee forward the following recommendations to the May 6, 1997 Council meeting for approval: 1) Approval the final design oftheSWDash Point Road at 21st Avenue SWTraffic Signal and Intersection Improvement Project; 2) Authorize staff to bid the project and proceed with the low bid directly to Council if within budget. k:\streets\project3\dasbpt21 \1 00% .des CITY OF .. 8- = E:I:J~ ~~~ DATE: April 28, 1997 TO: Phil Watkins, Chair Land Use/Transportation Committee ~('À FROM: Ken Miller, Street Systems Manager SUBJECT: SW 336th Street, from 21st Ave SW to 26th Ave SW Improvement Project - 100% Design Approval and Authorization to Bid Background The design is 100% complete for the SW 336th Street Improvement Project. This project will widen the road from three to five lanes, install 12-foot wide sidewalks, street trees, improved lighting, traffic signal revisions, access control, and resolve the street flooding problems during heavy rains. Staff is currently completing the Storm Drainage Easements and Rights of Entry to complete the project, and anticipate bidding in June 1997 depending upon Easement acquisition. The 100% design plans will be presented at the May 5, 1997 Land Use/Transportation Committee meeting. Recommendation Staff requests the Committee forward the following recommendations to the May 6, 1997 Council meeting for approval: 1) Approval the final design of the SW 336th Street Improvement Project; 2) Authorize staff to bid the project and proceed with the low bid directly to Council if within budget. Ie: \streets\projects\sw336th\lOO%.des (!~¡j¿ ¡-altc tb1//¡tiej C&RLi:S J COIHiON JR 35530 6th ~VE S W FEDERAL ",{;'Y, or/" 98023 4/27/1997 Phone: 838-2392 TO: LAlID USE/TRANSrORT"TION CO~~ITTEE .MR WATKINS, l~ GJ1T~ & ¡~~ GINTZ SUB:Minutes of April 7th,1997 meating (Summary) Section 4 F. BRIEFING ON BELLA CARINO WOODS SURFACE .i"TEn ?ROBLE4"1S. I am concerned that the MIl~T]s do not reflect what was discussed during the meeting. I am concerned that the following items that occured during the~are not in the minutes: M~i!'Ï/Vr;.. 1. Mr Thode's explanation as to why the calculations used to determine the size of the retention pond were incorrect. The City records are in conflict, in some pl~ces they state that the retention pond should be 3 times larger than it is. 2. Mr Thode's comment as to the fact that the overflow drain appears at 306' on the preliminary plat, not the 319í' that it is inatalled at. 3. Mr Thode's comment that the retention pond infiltration rate was not based on 7 day rainfall data, but on 1 day rginfall èata. The design did not indicate 7 day storm calculations in accordance with King County Design Standards. 4. Mr Roe's comments after Mr Pratt's briefing to the effect that they (the City) foresaw the present problem and that was the reason for the briefing. 5. ¡~ Roe's comment to l~ clottershead that no drainage pipe had been removed, therefor removal of drainage pipe was not the reason for flooding on the 357th side of SW 356th. 6. lvir aoe's comment to the council members that they (The City) were most open with ¡~ Mottershead and myself, giving us all the data and information that we wanted. When challanged by me that it took over six weeks to get the information, his response was: "There were Bome delays caused by "CLAIlw1S AGAINST THE CITY". T[lis was supported by Mr Sterbank. When I challanged l<1r Sterbank that there were not CLAIlw1S but ONE CLAIM that the city couldn't give me the status of. Mr Sterbank did not respond. c."."'f\.w\t!,.,¡T 7. Mr Roe'sAthat they ( The City) had invited ~~ Mottershead and my- self down to city hall to discuss the Bellacarino Woods development/ problems and that they had given us all the drawings we wanted. 8. Mr Gintz statement that the City had a similar flooding problem once before at Fisher's Pond and ended up buying the house. 9. Mr Gintz statement that under current rules, the city would not let lvir parke build a house where his is located now. I question why the city is letting Bellacarino Woods build tlomes below t,tle 319t' level of the retention pond overflow pipe. 10. 1-1r Gintz question to ¡-II' Thad e 8S to why during the orlgional hearing on Bellacarino \'ioods, did lw1r Thode Btandup and withdraw his objections to the development? And- :~ Thode's response that the reason he wittldrew his objections were because he was assured by the city ( lvir Roe) and the Bellacarino \'¡oods engineers that the water level would not change from the existing level. IZ: would not increase. 11. Mr Roe's statem3nt that the retention pond has been scraped to in~ prove infiltration, Bellacarino ~oods engineers have du3 additional test holes and that the pond my have to be scraped again. (Certalnly confirm/ recognize that ther~is a problem) 12. Mr ?rattls disagreement with ~r Thode's comment concerning the 306' level ap~earing anywhere and his statement that 3192' ~as the figure on the final drawings. 13. Mr Pratt's statement that infiltration figures were not taken into account in the retention ponds sizing. ( 7 day infiltration rates should hve been) 14. Mr Pratts explanation on 1 day vs 7 day data and that 1 day rain data was used and that the retention pond was over excavated based on 1 day storm data. 15. Mr Prattls inference that l~ Parke's home and property and other property in the closed depression ( the one shaded in red on the map used during the briefing) would be needed through Durchase or easment to construct a storm retention facility to help solve the Bellacarlno Woods Surface water problem. 16. The general impression from the council members that they ( the City) were not responsible for the approval of the Bellacarino Woods project. But it was kind of shoved on them by King County and the] were stuck with the package. 17. Para 4, F. BRIEFIl~G ON B~LilCActIHO \iOODS SURl;~nCE T~.nTE.:ì ..?ROBLEiv1: Copy attached. You will notice in the paragraph summary there is no mention of the fact that 1'4r Pratt did give a briefing. He also showed a map with the area being flooed shaded in red. This was called a "Closed depression". We now have at least 3 closed depre[Eions mentioned with Belleracano Woods w~ich results in confusion. The depression discussed by 1'4r ?ratt 1s not the depression referred to in the Bellacarino Woods Dlat data nor is it the 11th Ave deDresslo~. It is property east of the Bellacarino Woods. Even a "SUl~~RŸ" of minutes should at least mention that there waB a briefi~g. The real point which seemed to be missed in Mr Pratt's briefing on Bellacarlno Woods Surface Water ?roblem is: If then:ls a problem (and the~is) and the city is aware of it (and it is as indicated by the need for a briefing) why is Surf&ce Water Management preping the council that a request for funding is on the way for 1999 1 There is still a Bond against Bellacarino Woods and the city has documentation in the Brown & Caldwell r6port that Bellacarino Woods is responsible for 30 % of the flooding, 11th Ave depression responsible for 15% (im~acted by Bellacarino Woods) and future developments (SilverWood etc) responsible for 54% The city is only responsible for 1%. See attached report. The city should not pay. We know who is responsible, that'Swho should pay. How do I get the minutes ammended ? PS: Bellacarino Woods has a 2nd retention pond at about m¡ 353 & 4th SW that also overflows and floods vacant land to the east. \~-ater from S'o'l 353 street dra ins, dump directly onto the. vacant land-bYDassing the ~ond. Slnceraly, cAa-~ ... .. .september 1997. Other &ervico Chao&C6 wouJd be pcC6CD&Cd &0 &bo public {or funber cororoo-,w wi1h !.be inu:üt of implt'-l'V"-I1,..!ion in Febnwy 1998. I E. Code Amendment for Modific4tion Criteria of Street St.andarrl~ - 'I'be issue regardWg the Valleton family home, loca.ted at the end of a grave! road and the deœ1'Dlination that the Va.Uetoo& must pave only that portion of roadway tbMJ &buts their property has becomo the model for future paving of gnLvel ro.d& in Federal Way. In an effort to provide: bdter service while addressing c:odo reqWremeots, staff prC6eoted a.oocher option provjding {or the paving of grlivel r~ wi1hin ~ City. 'J'W¡ states that when there is an application for II. singe f&mily home on II. gnLve.1 road a1ready 75 % developed t1w !.bere would eXÌit II. DO-pr0te6t LID Agreemeot for street paving including rnainteQlOOCO reipon¡ibility. ~ new projecti &urfäee, new fliCÙ may cbange previous decisions made regarding tho Val1eton property. 'I'be Committee wished to defer any fwther discUüion on tho paved vs gravel road issue until goah were cle.arly defWed, a &trOllg middle ~on is adopted and LID options tborou&hJy rC6earched. F. Briefine on Bellarcarino Surfllce Wllter Problem. Mr. Mottershead, Mr. 'IbodeyaDd Mr. CoDOOn ¡POke oftbeir concem& about rainwater overflow in the closed depression/retention pond at Bel.Iac&rino Woods ¡ulxÜvÍ¡ion. They conteDd &hMt ¡ÌDCð the development of Bellaca.ri.no, surface water has incre&5Cd <:&USing local flooding on &butting propt:ny. City staff b&i reviewed the various hydrologic &tuwC6 that were s~miued prior to ~ permit ÍS4U&DCC IU:¥1 bl&.SCd on thU documentation have concluded that the dc:sign standards {or c::loðed depression COJl&ttuction were followed by the BeJlac&rioo Woods engineers. Staff are await.ing the rC6ulti o{ further review by tho Bel.lacarioo Woods developer', engWec:Ci aDd, b.i.scd on the results of that review, may recomlW'-nd IJod(litio¡W work bo petformed 5UCh ai scraping the poDd bottom to incrC&iC intiltration of litonnwater. City &taf{ have temporarily ce&&ed reviewing tho Silverwood developak:1U apliwion, pending receipt of the re&ulti of tho Bel1ac&rino Woods engiDeeCi' review. G. Briefin¡: on Si~ Code Enforcement - Sign code CllfOrcemeÐt work is procANfi"g well. Of 1500 existing &¡go¡ 28 % lItO now in conforma.t)CO aDd 42% aro legal DOn~nforming &igo¡. Tho remaining -other' &i&J3S are the most difficult to Cllforce, Le., thOie at apartments aDd non highway 99 locations. JlJegal &ign¡ which aro in&talled without ~nnits include i4Wdwich bo&rdi and real estate signs. Two interns will begin work in late April to compLxo the identiflC&tion of the remaining si&J3S. Tho word is out in the community about the tough &ign regulations in the City ofFedenù Way. As a reiult, ,i&1"l pennits Wtvo increased. Digital camera technology Wai demonstrated to the ~mmirt~ as the preferred meù:IOd of recording &í&1"l and other code violations 5. OTHER ITEMS There were no other item& to di&c::uss. 6. FUTURE MEETINGS/AGENDAS Tho next meeting will be April 21, 1997. 7. ADJOURN The meeting was adjowned at 8:15pm. 1: \LU- TRANSWR7LUTC.SUM