The URL can be used to link to this page

LUTC PKT 12-07-2015 Committee Members City Staff Bob Celski, Chair Marwan Salloum P.E., Public Works Director Kelly Maloney, Member Shawna Upton, Administrative Assistant II Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member 253-835-2703 City of Federal Way City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee December 7, 2015 City Hall 5:30 p.m. Council Chambers MEETING AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes) 3. COMMITTEE BUSINESS Topic Title/Description Presenter Page Action or Info Council Date Time A. Approval of Minutes: November 2, 2015 Upton 3 Action N/A 5 min B. Temporary Suspension of Impact Fees for Change in Use Long 7 Info N/A 5 min C. 2015 Surface Water Management Capital Improvement Program Updates Appleton 9 Action January 5, 2016 Consent 5 min D. South 356th Street Regional Detention Facility Retrofit Project – Project Acceptance Tang 21 Action January 5, 2016 Consent 5 min E. 2016-2017 Neighborhood Traffic Safety (NTS) Program – Rejection of Bids Preston 23 Action January 5, 2016 Consent 5 min F. Ordinance: Amending Chapter 19.45 Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) - Variances Herrera 27 Action January 5, 2016 Ordinance First Reading 10 min G. Acceptance of Water Quality Stormwater Capacity Agreement Thurlow 41 Action January 5, 2016 Consent 5 min H. Acceptance of the King County Flood Control District Sub-Regional Opportunity Fund Award Thurlow 43 Action January 5, 2016 Consent 5 min I. Grant Funding for Transportation Improvement Projects – Authorization to Accept Grant Funding Mulkey 45 Action January 5, 2016 Consent 5 min J. S 352nd Street Extension from Enchanted Parkway South to Pacific Highway South Project - Bid Award Mulkey 47 Action January 5, 2016 Consent 5 min K. State Participating Agreement – Pacific Highway S HOV Lanes Phase V Mulkey 53 Action January 5, 2016 Consent 5 min L. Ordinance: Proposed Code Amendment Related to Permits for Encroachments into the Public Right-of-Way Adding a New Section to Chapter 4.25 FWRC Orthmann 69 Action January 5, 2016 Ordinance First Reading 5 min 4. OTHER 5. FUTURE MEETINGS/AGENDA ITEMS: The next LUTC meeting will be Monday, January 4, 2016 at 5:30 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers. 6. ADJOURN This page left blank intentionally. 2 City of Federal Way City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee November 2, 2015 5:30 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers MEETING SUMMARY Committee Members in Attendance: Committee Chair Bob Celski and Committee members Kelly Maloney and Lydia Assefa-Dawson. Council members in attendance: Deputy Mayor Jeanne Burbidge. Staff in Attendance: Public Works Director Marwan Salloum, Community Development Director Michael Morales, City Attorney Amy Jo Pearsall, City Traffic Engineer Rick Perez, Street Systems Manager John Mulkey, Surface Water Manager Theresa Thurlow, Development Services Manager Edward Walsh, Planner Manager Isaac Conlen, Principal Planner Margaret Clark, Senior Planner Matt Herrera, Senior Traffic Engineer Erik Preston, and Administrative Assistant II Shawna Upton. 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Celski called the meeting to order at 5:30 PM. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes) There were no public comments. 3. COMMITTEE BUSINESS Topic Title/Description A. Approval of Minutes: October 5, 2015 B. Committee approved the October 5, 2015, LUTC minutes as presented. Moved: Maloney Seconded: As~efa-Dawson Passed: Unanimously, 2-0 Chair Celski did not attend the October 5th meeting and abstained. Demonstrating Completion of the 2015 Growth Management Act Periodic Update Ms. Clark presented information on the Growth Management Act and stated that the GMA requires the City to update its comprehensive plan and development regulations, including its critical areas ordinance by June 30, 2016. The GMA update requires compliance with the Department of Commerce and Puget Sound Regional Council Comprehensive Plan and Department of Commerce Development Regulations Update checklists as well as be consistent with PSRC's vision 2040 and the Countywide Planning Policies (CPP's). Ms. Clark listed the updated ordinances and stated the GMA requires that legislative action be taken to demonstrate the completion of the update. Certification enables the City to be eligible for loans and grants such as State Public Works Trust Fund loans, State Centennial Clean Water Fund grants and State of Washington Transportation Improvement Board Fund grants. Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented. Moved: Maloney Seconded: Assefa-Dawson Passed: Unanimously, 3-0 Forward to Council N/A November 17, 2015 Business Committee Members Bob Ce/ski, Chair Kelly Maloney, Member Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member 3 City Staff Marwan Salloum, PE, Public Works Director Shawna Upton, Administrative Assistant II 253-835-2703 C. Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance System Repair Project -30% Design Status Report November 17, 2015 D. E. Consent Ms. Thurlow mentioned that initially, staff had proposed this project be completed in two phases. Inspections show pipe condition has deteriorated more quickly than anticipated so the two phases have been combined into one project. Staff will prioritize the repair work in accordance with pipe condition. She presented information and pictures showing the cured in place pipe (CIPP) repair methods. Project design is approximately 30% complete. Discussion was held regarding budget funds, prioritization, if excavation will be necessary and what the useful life of the new CIPP liners is expected to be. Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented. Moved: Assefa-Dawson Seconded: Maloney Passed: Unanimously, 3-0 Speed Limit Ordinance -S 352"d Street Extension Mr. Preston stated the City has a fully-funded project design and is ready to construct the extension of S 352"d Street from Enchanted Parkway South (SR 161) to Pacific Highway South (SR 99). The speed limit for this specific section of roadway is currently not defined in City code. Streets not defined in the code default to the state maximum speed limit which is 25 miles per hour. Based on the physical characteristics of the roadway, city staff recommends a 35 mile per hour speed limit on S 352nd Street. The goal is to reduce collisions by balancing the speed that vehicles are traveling with their spacing. Mr. Preston provided several examples of other principal collector streets that are similar to S 352nd Street. A higher speed limit will make S 352"d Street extension an attractive alternate to parallel arterials while balancing safety concerns due to access spacing, bicycle traffic and other factors. A brief discussion was held. Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented. Moved: Maloney Seconded: Assefa-Dawson Passed: Unanimously, 3-0 Zoning and Development Code Text Amendment: Variance Procedures Mr. Herrera presented the proposed text amendment from the 2015 Planning Commission Work Program. This item was requested to be added to the program by staff to provide better assistance to the public. The proposal would provide administrative variances to the zoning provisions as an alternative to current procedures which are to conduct a public hearing and have the hearing examiner issue the decision ten days following the hearing. This would apply to requests for relief of the zoning code for measureable standards of 25% and less; such as front, rear and side yard setbacks, height limitations and lot coverage limitations. This is a procedural amendment only. What staff proposes is to change the decision maker, not the decisional criteria. There would still have a notice period for citizens to provide comment and staff would provide an analysis on the decision. A lengthy discussion continued regarding how many of the requests that have been made would fall under the proposed criteria, the length of time it would take for review under the new process, further clarification of height restrictions and other decision criteria as w~II as noticing requirements. Committee Moved Item to December Agenda. No Action Taken November 17, 2015 Ordinance Firs t Reading November 17, 2015 Ordinance First Reading Committee Members Bob Ce/ski, Chair 4 City Staff Marwan Salloum, P.E, Public Works Director Sha wn a Upton, Administrative Assistant II 253-835-2703 Kelly Maloney, Member Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member F. Pete von Reichbauer Way S and S 316th Street Sidewalk Replacement Project -85% Design Status Report and Authorization to Bid Mr. Mulkey presented a brief background on this project noting that the project will replace existing sidewalks and improve streetscapes in the area. He addressed progress to date, estimated expenditures and available funding. Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented. Moved: Maloney Seconded: Assefa-Dawson Passed: Unanimously, 3-0 November 17, 2015 Consent G. Grant Funding for Transportation Improvement Projects -Authorization to Accept Grant November 17, 2015 Funding Consent H. Mr. Mulkey presented the Steel Lake Park to Downtown Trail Vicinity Map which includes a sidewalk extension on the south side of S 31ih Street between 23rd Avenue Sand the crosswalk entrance to the Park. The staff memo provides Council with the current status of the grant applications submitted in 2015 under legislative earmark. The Steel Lake Park to Downtown Trail project was submitted and staff is seeking authorization to accept grant funds with required city match. Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented. Moved: Assefa-Dawson Seconded: Maloney Passed: Unanimously, 3-0 2016 Pedestrian Safety Program -Authorization to Bid Mr. Perez provided information on the citywide pedestrian improvements program. The goals of the program are to increase pedestrian safety at mid-block crossing locations. He covered pedestrian collision history from the last 10 years illustrating where a need for further safety measures exists. He outlined the criteria used to prioritize locations where flashing beacon systems would be installed. Criteria increased for locations next to senior housing. Staff evaluated 77 locations. Some locations were dismissed because the locations didn't have enough sight distance to make a safe crossing location or the locations where pedestrians cross would be more than 3 lanes at a time or 79 feet. Staff proposes a minimum of 6 points to justify the investment for this project. Mr. Perez provided a map that shows the locations which already have RRFB's, current year installations and newly proposed locations. Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented. Moved: Maloney Seconded: Assefa-Dawson Passed: Unanimously, 3-0 4. OTHER 5. FUTURE MEETINGS/AGENDA ITEMS: November 17, 2015 Consent The next LUTC meeting will be Monday, December 7, 2015 at 5:30 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers. 6. ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 6:50 PM . COMMITTEE APPROVAL: Bob Celski , Chair Committee Members Bob Ce/ski~ Chair Kelly Maloney, Member Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member Attest: Kelly Maloney, Member 5 Shawna Upton, Administrative Assistant II Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member City Staff Marwan Salloum, P.E , Public Works Director Shawna Upton, Administrative Assistant II 253-835-2703 This page left blank intentionally. 6 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 5, 2016 ITEM#: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: 2015 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM UPDATES POLICY QUESTION: Should Council approve the proposed 2015 updates to the SWM Capital Improvement Program? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee CATEGORY: ~ Consent D City Council Business D Ordinance D Resolution MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015 O Public Hearing Other STAFF REPORT BY: Will A leton, P.hP~blic Works De ut Director_____ --· __ Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated December 7, 2015 Options Considered: 1. Adopt the proposed 2015 updates to the SWM CIP __ _2. _ Rej ect the rnp_osed UP..~te~ and Rrovide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMEND TION: Option 1 CHIEF OF STAFF: A TION: I move to forward Option I to the January 5, 20 I 6 consent agenda. Bob Celski, Chair Kelly Maloney, Member Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to approve the 2015 updates to the Surface Water Management Capital Improvement Program " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: O APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# O DENIED O T ABLEDfDEFERRED/NO ACTION O MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) 15T reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION# REVISED -08/ 12/2010 9 DATE: TO: VIA: FROM: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM December 7, 2015 Land Use and · fransportation Committee Jim Ferrell, Mayor 1 ~ Marwan Salloum, Public Works Director ~......--- William Appleton, Deputy Public Works Director /!IT Theresa Thurlow, Surface Water Manager 1jf) SUBJECT: 2015 Surface Water Management CIP Updates BACKGROUND: The purpose of the SWM Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is to identify, design and construct surface water related projects within the City that will enable the City to continue meeting both its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II permit requirements and meet surface water related needs of the citizens of Federal Way. While it is the intent of the SWM utility to construct the SWM CIP Projects as scheduled, CIP projects will at times be removed, added or modified based on new information gathered through engineering studies, operational observations, permit monitoring and continual reevaluation of our community's needs. In 2015, proposed changes to the SWM CIP are as follows: PROJECT ADDITIONS • Project #14, Town Center Park LID Demonstration Project On Sept 15, 2015 Council approved a new SWM CIP project to integrate Low Impact Development techniques for storm water into the Town Center Park Project. This project will provide educational elements to the Park that will facilitate and support storm water education and outreach in area schools, summer programs, special interest groups and the general public. Estimated total project cost: $400,000. Scheduled completion: 2016. • Project #15, Regional Flow Control Facility Upgrade Study This study will identify and evaluate alternative approaches to upgrading our ex1stmg regional flow control facilities that serve the Downtown Core and Frame from Level 1 flow control to Level 2 flow control. Estimated total study costs: $80,000. Schedule Completion: 2016 • Project #16, Conveyance System Restoration (Slip Line) Numerous blockages, caused by root incursion into the storm water conveyance system have been impacting the operation of the detention facility at 1st Ave S. and SW 320th street. This project will reline the pipes most susceptible to root incursion, eliminating the possibility of any future related impacts. Estimated total cost: $100,000. Scheduled completion: 2016 . 10 December 7, 2015 Land Use and Transportation Committee Page 2 PROJECT DELETIONS • Project #9, LID Retrofit Preliminary geotechnical and engineering analyses show that none of the proposed retrofit locations would support Low Impact Development techniques. Grant funding was anticipated for construction of this project, however based on preliminary engineering design a competitive project cannot be developed. Removal of this project will reduce CIP costs by $507,000. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS • Proiect #6, Phase V Highway 99 Proiect -S 344th Street at Highway 99 Property acquisition costs associated with this project are expected to be higher than the $500,000 budgeted. It is recommended that an additional $250,000 be added to the project budget to ensure adequate funding is available for purchasing the target property. Estimated total cost: $1,454, 180. Scheduled completion: 2016/2017. • Proiect #1 & #2, Conveyance System Restoration SWM has determined that there is adequate time and funding to combine these two restoration projects in the Marine Hills area into one project to be constructed in 2016. Combining these projects will address system deficiencies sooner and also allow for potential cost savings based on economies of scale. Estimated total cost: $1,83 8,000. Scheduled completion: 2016. • Proiect #10, West Hylebos Education Center and Trail It is recommended that the preliminary project scoping and design phase for this project be started in 2016 rather than 2017 in order to provide more time for identifying grant funding opportunities for construction. There is no anticipated cost impacts associated with this recommended change. • Project #9, Bridges Property Culvert Removal and Replacement It is recommended that this project be rescheduled to begin preliminary project scoping and design in 2016 with construction in 201 7. Given unanticipated work load, staff were unable to begin this project in 2015 as originally planned. There is no anticipated cost impacts associated with this recommended change. The proposed changes to the SWM CIP are estimated to add an additional $323,000 of project costs in FY 2016, these added costs will be paid for with funds from the SWM unallocated reserves. Project summary sheets are attached for Projects 14-16. Additionally, a project location map has also been provided as well as a summary table for the proposed updated 2015- 2022 SWM CIP. 11 2015-2021 SWM CIP -CAPITAL PROJECTS December 2015 Project 14: Town Square Park Stormwater Low Impact Development (LID) Outreach Project Project Location: Town Square Park Stormwater (LID) Outreach Project Municipalities across Western Washington are implementing requirements from the Department of Ecology municipal stormwater permit, including low impact development. The conventional retention/detention approach to stormwater runoff is evolving toward distributed low impact development treatments that promote infiltration and reduce runoff volumes. This project will provide an educational experience highlighting the various LID techniques and their benefits compared to traditional stormwater management approaches. Project elements include permeable pavers, depressed landscaping, educational signage and a rain garden with native plantings. The proposed LID elements will replace traditional construction materials and will be integrated into a facility already scheduled for construction . Description Property Acquisition Subtotal Design Subtotal Construction Subtotal Project Category: Major CIP Land Acquisition: Not Required Proiect Benefits • Excellent educational visibility • Stormwater treatment at the headwaters of Hylebos Creek • Site topography and proposed park design allow multiple types of LID installations • Proposed LID elements integrate into construction already scheduled rather than retrofitting an existing site. Proiect Facts • SWM has been actively seeking LID demonstration projects • The LID Outreach project is an urban compliment to the popular Storming the Sound with Salmon program • The project will showcase technology that can readily be used in commercial and residential areas Cost $ - $ 50,000 $ 350,000 Total $ 400,000 Page 1 2015-2021 SWM CIP -CAPITAL PROJECTS December 2015 -· ----------· ------~ ·----.---.. ---.. ----, ' I '. ' Proposed Town Square Park Design Line Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Construction Cost Design Items 1 Engineerin Design 1 EA $ 50,000 $ 50,000 2 Design Subtotal $ 50,000 -•A_,_,,,.....,...._ Construction Items 3 Pervious Concrete Trail 1,300 SY $ 95 $ 123,500 4 Permeable Pavers at Pla zas 14,000 SF $ 12 $ 168,000 5 Green Roof add -on 2 EA $ 15 ,000 $ 30,000 --- 6 Was .hington_State Sales _Tax (9.5 %) ------·-··---·-···-·· $ 2~-~-~-~ 7 Construction Subtotal $ 350,440 Page 2 2015-2021 SWM CIP -CAPITAL PROJECTS December 2015 Project 15: West Hylebos Basin Regional Flow Control Alternatives Analysis Project Location: West Hylebos Basin Flow Control Alternatives Analysis The City constructed flow control facilities throughout the West Hylebos basin to allow commercial development to pay a fee in-lieu of providing on-site detention . Flow control requirements have become more stringent since completion of the regional facilities and they no longer provide the required level of treatment. As a result, all development in the basin must construct on-site detention facilities . The purpose of this study is to evaluate expansion options to bring the facilities back to compliance . A regional facility meeting current standards will greatly benefit both new development and redevelopment within the City core. Project Category: Design/ Analysis Land Acquisition: Required Proiect Benefits • Increase regional stormwater detention capacity • Fee in-lieu opportunity for developers to avoid flow control on-site within the City core • Improved stream habitat and base flow duration • Increased maintenance efficiencies Proiect Facts • The City currently owns and operates two large regional facilities in the study area (Kitts Pond and the S 336th Wetlands) • Regional detention facilities throughout the City have dramatically reduced flooding frequency and severity _________ .. _________ Description __ ,, ____ .. _. __ -·----· ·-·--····--------··---+----C_o:...s_t ___ -1 uisition Subtotal TBD $ 80,0 00 Construction Subtotal TBD 14 Page 1 2015-2021 SWM CIP -CAPITAL PROJECTS December 2015 Line ~----------D_e_s_c_r'...,.1p_t_io_n Units Unit Cost Cost Desi n Items 1 EngineeringJ tudy ____ _ Page Z 2015-2021 SWM CIP -CAPITAL PROJECTS December 2015 Project 16: S 320th St Conveyance System Restoration at 1st Ave S Project Location: S 320th St at 1st Ave S Conveyance System Restoration A series of rainstorms in the fall of 2015 identified a conveyance blockage in the City's trunk system along S 320th St from 151 Ave S to Fishers Bog. A series of tree root intrusions in aging corrugated metal pipe reduced flow in the pipe to a trickle and caused significant backup in a City pond that resulted in minor residential flooding . City staff utilized pumps and pipe plugs to drain the pond and found substantial root balls and tap roots in the pipe. The tap roots entered the pipe at joints and caused enough damage to warrant lining. This project will restore the conveyance capacity and long term reliability of the system through lining the pipe segments most susceptible to root intrusion. Additional junction structure and control structure repair will also be included. Description u_..,.,..,.. ___ Property Acquisition Subtotal Desi~n Subtotal Construction Subtotal 16 Project Category: Minor CIP Land Acquisition: None Required Project Benefits • Use of lining and minimal excavation is safer and less risky that traditional open cut replacement. Traffic impacts will also be reduced. • The project will restore conveyance capacity in the system that was reduced by+/-90% due to tree root intrusions Project Facts • Depth of pipe does not allow for excavation • The conveyance system connects CP 64 -a City maintained stormwater pond -and Fishers Bog. • The conveyance system was constructed by King County and has required minimal maintenance until now Cost NA $ - $ 100,000 Total $ 100,000 Page 1 Decem~et~01~ S 320th St Conveyance Map Line Descri tion Quantit Units Unit Cost Construction Cost Construction Items 3 18" Pipe Liner 420 LF $ 210 $ 88,200 4 Structure repairs 3 EA $ 1,000 $ 3,000 6 Washington State Sales Tax (9.5%) $ 8,210 7 Construction Subtotal $ 99,410 Page .2 2015 TO 2022 SURFACE WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 0 Map ID Project 1 Marine Hills Conveyance System Repairs -North of S 293rd Street 2 Marine Hills Conveyance System Repairs -South of S 293rd Street 3 South 373rd Street Stream Crossing Re-Route and Restoration 4 West Hylebos Conservation Property Acquisition 5 South 356th Culvert Replacement 6 Phase V Highway 99 Project -South 344th Street at Highway 99 7 South 359th Street Weir Repair 8 Alderdale Park Trunk Replacement and Pond Expansion 9 Low Impact Development (LID) Retrofit Project 10 Bridges Property Culvert Removal and Replacement 11 West Hylebos Educational Center and Trail 12 West Hylebos Trail (Spring Valley) 13 South 336th Street at Highway 99 2015 Additions 14 Town Square Park Stormwater LID Outreach Project 15 West Hvlebos Basin Regional Flow Control Alternatives Analysis 16 S 320th St Conveyance System Restoration at 1st Ave S Le&oJECr.LEG£N D1 a Added Project m Modified Project EJ Removed Project I-' 00 N [LEGENQ] • Lakes Wetlands CJ City Limits + 1,500 3,000 6,000 ---===------Feet 1 inch = 3,000 feet City of !=ederal Way, Public Works Surface Water Management Division (253) 835-2700 Note: All facilities displayed are for storm water. No potable water or sewer facilities are shown , Disclaimer: This map is intended for use as a graphical representation only. The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accurac~. ~ ~I '[~~111,~.~~~~- ., SW f 211TH ST ~ ~ • ~I , ~ ... ~ "' ~ ~ !J I ~0 r< ( ~, ii ~£'~T\ !\~ ~ "' t ; "' I I-' \0 I Project N.ime Conveyance System Restoration Program -Phase 1 Conveyance System Restoration Program -Phase 2 S 373 st. Stream Crossing Re-route and Restoration W. Hylebos Basin Land Acquisition (Snyder/Castellar) SW 356th Street Culvert Replacement Hwy 99 Phase V -S 344th Street WQ Facility South 359th Street Weir Repair Alderdale Park Trunk Replacement & Pond Expansion bow Imped De..,elopmeet {bll>) RetFofit PFOjeet Bridges Property Culvert Removal and Replacement West Hylebos Educational Center & Trail West Hylebos Trail (Spring Valley) S.W. 336th Street at Hwy 99 WQ Facility 2015 Additions Town Center Park LID Demonstration Project West Hylebos Basin Regional Flow Control Alternatives Analysis S. 320th St Conveyance System Restoration at 1st Ave S. l otat annual CIP expenditure Projecit Estimated Number Cost 1 985.000 2 853,000 3 864,000 4 200,000 5 2,776,000 6 1,465,000 7 309,000 8 1,198.000 9 ~- 10 315,000 11 1,396,000 12 2,971.000 13 2,052,064 14 400,000 15 80,000 16 100,000 CIP Schedule 2015 -2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 ' 2021 2022 100,000 885,000 103,000 750,000 20,000 81,000 763,000 200,000 53,000 172,000 2,551,000 750,000 715,000 48,000 261,000 22,000 1,176,000 ;!,QJ7,QQQ 36,000 279,000 108,000 1,288,000 87,000 2,884,000 673,000 64 1,379,000 50,000 350,000 80,000 100,000 1,223,000 3,105,000 1,042,000 1.375.000 3.658,000 433,064 3,952,000 1,176,000 This page left blank intentionally. 20 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 5, 2016 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL ITEM#: SUBJECT: South 356 111 Street Regional Detention Facility Retrofit Project-Project Acceptance ----- POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council accept the South 356 1 1, Street R~gional Detention Facility Retrofit Project constructed by Lloyd Enterprises , Inc. as complete? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Tran s portation Committee -· CATEGORY: [;gi Consent O City Council Business D Ordinance D Resolution . ..-- STAFf REPORT BY : Fei Tan g. P:.E.'. S_'Nrvt Pr()ject l:rigineer fr f Attachments: MEETING DATE: December 7.2015 D D Public Hearing Other DEPT: Public Works Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated December 7, 2015 . Options Considered: 1. Authorize final acceptance of the South 356 111 Street Regional Detention Facility Retrofit Project constructed by Lloyd Enterprises, Inc in the amount of $766,671.5 7 as complete. 2. Do not authorize final acceptance of the completed South 356th Street Regional Detention Facility Retrofit Project constructed by Lloyd Enterprises, Inc as complete and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option I to the January 5; Con sent Agenda for approv a l. CHIEF OF STAFF: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDA ION: I move to forward Option I to the Janua,y 5, 2016 City C o uncil consent agenda for approval. Bob Celski, Chair Kelly Maloney, Member Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "/ move to authorize final acceptance of th e South 356'" Street Regional Detention Facility Retrofit Project constructed by Lloyd Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $766,67 J.57as complete. " (B E LOW TO 8 £ COMPLETE D BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COltN('(L ACTION: D .-\PPROVED O DENIED O TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION O MOVED TO SECOND READlr\G (ordinances 011/,1) REVISED -1/2015 21 COl 'i'iCIL BILL# I 51 reading Enactment reading ORDl;\;Ac'iCE # RESOLllTION # DATE: TO: VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Dec e mber 7, 20 I 5 Land Use and Transportati o n Committee Jim Ferrell, Mayor Marwan Salloum, P.E .. Public Works Director Fei Tang, P.E., SWM Project Engineer rt South 356111 Street Regional Detention Fa ci/it 11 Retrofit Project -Proiect Acceptance BACKGROUND: Prior to release of retainage on a Public Works construction project, the City Council must accept the w rk a mp le te lo meet tate Depart111en1 of Reven ue and tate Department r Labor and Industries requir menl . The o uth 356'" treel Re g ional Detention Facility Retrolit Pr 0ect constructed by Lloyd Ent erpri es. In c , i co mpl ete. The final co n truction contract amo unt i $766.671.57. This is $86,038.61 be low th $852.710.18(in clud in gcontinge n y budgetthatwa ·approvedb rheCiLyCouncilonJune 18, 2013. cc : l'rojecl File Da ) File 22 COUNCIL MEETING DA TE: January 5, 2016 ITEM#: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: 2016-20 l 7 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC SAFETY (NTS) PROGRAM -REJECTION OF BIDS POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council reject the bid for the 2016-2017 Neighborhood Traffic Safety (NTS) Program? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015 CATEGORY: ~ Consent O Ordinance O Public Hearing O City Council Business O Resolution O Other §_T~FF REPORT B ~ Erik Preston P.E . -Senior Traffic ~n ineer ~ DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated December 7, 2015. Options Considered: I. Reject all bids for the 2016-2017 Neighborhood Traffic Safety (NTS) Program and direct staff to re- bid the project. 2. Award the 2016-20 I 7 Neighborhood Traffic Safety (NTS) Program to AA Asphalt, LLC with the _low~st res onsive,..i_eS onsible q_uote, in an amount not to exceed $80,000_. ______ _ MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option I to the January 5, 2 6 City Council Consent Agenda for approval. CHIEF OF STAFF: ATION: The Committee recommends forwarding Option I to the January 5 , 2016 City Council consent agenda for approval. Bob Celski, Chair Kelly Maloney, Member Lydia Assefa-Dawson,Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "/ move to authorize staff to reject all bids for the 2016-2017 Neighborhood Traffic Safety (NTS) Program and direct staff to re-bid the project." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: O APPROVED O DENIED O TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION O MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED -1/2015 23 COUNCIL BILL# l 5T reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION # DATE: TO: VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM December 7, 2015 Land Use and Transportation Committee .. L _ ---- Marwan Salloum P.E. Public Works Director~ Rick Perez, P.E., C ity Traffic Engineer ~ Erik Preston, P.E., enior Traffic Engineer ~ 2016-2017 Neighborhood Traffic Safety (NTS) Program -Rejection of Bids BACKGROUND: On October 23, 2015, staff sent a request for a unit price quote (RFQ) to a short list of contractors on the MSRC Small Works Roster who have the capabilities of executing the installation of neighborhood traffic calming devices within pre-determined deadlines. Two (2) quotes were received and opened on November 18, 2015. See the attached Exhibit A, Quote Tabulation Summary. AA Asphalting, LLC of Sumner submitted the lowest quote. However, the unit prices quoted for comparable bid items are much higher than the winning quotes received for previous NTS program contracts for 2014-2015, 2012-2013, and 2009-2010. A comparison to previous contracts is attached as Exhibit B -Previous Contract Unit Price Comparison. As Exhibit B indicates the current unit prices are substantially higher than previous contracts, representing an average unit price increase ranging from 162% to 555% for comparable unit prices on comparable work items. There are no known market factors that would explain the sudden jump in pricing. To accept the current low bid would mean fewer work items per project could be funded, and perhaps fewer NTS projects could be undertaken within the annual $30,000 operating budget. cc : Project File Day File 24 EXHIBIT A· Quote Tabulation Summary REQUEST FOR QUOTE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 2016-17 Neighborhood Traffic Safety (NTS) Program Exhibit A, Schedule A Notes: Vendor Name: Tunisia Construction, LLC Date Prepared : November 18. 2015 1 All items shall include in lhe price any required layout, mobilizalion, lraffic control, roadside cleanup, or any other incidentals. 2 All permanent pavement markings for traffic calming devices shall be done by others. 3 All permanent signs for traffic calming devices are done by others. 4 Any removal of pavement markings will be done by others . 5 Unit Price is per Each for a Traffic Circle Island, Complete within the circle diameter range, in fee SCHEDULE A CE.xamote of a "Tvolcal" Prolect As Described Under Snctlon Vl-11 Item "Typical" Project Unit Quantity Unit Price Multiplier B-7 Speed Hump, Complete (includes toe grind and temporary mar1<ings . Permanent signing and mar1<ings by others .) COFW 2 $7,559 32 2 Develooment Standard 3-26. COFW SP 8-32 EA B-9 Raised Crosswalk, Complete (includes toe grind and temporary markings . Permanent signing and markings by others .) COFW 1 $9,724.19 1 Develonment Standard 3-27 COFW SP 8-33 EA B-16 5 Traffic Circle Island, Complete (includes painted pre-cast curb, 32-foot pavement removal, monument case & valve box adjustment. Diameter 1 topsoil. Each (1) island by Circle Diameter range in feet) COFW Circle Development Standard 3-59, COFW SP 8-04 EA $28,066.65 1 Total of Schedule A " Muat be the ~ame as Schedule B PrlGe SCHEDULE B !Dlscretlonarv Work Orders As Described Under Section Vl-21 Item Quantity Range Unit Unit Price Multiplier B-1 Pre-Cast Traffic Curb, Painted 50 100 LF 183.04 50 WSDOT Standard Specification Section 8-07 101 500 LF 122 86 101 COFW Special Provision 8-07 501 + LF 74 .74 50 1 B-2 Block Traffic Curb, Painted 50 100 LF 192.91 50 COFW Development Standard 3-4 101 500 LF 14 0:2!1 101 COFW Snecial Provision 8-07 501 + LF 81 .80 501 B-3 Extruded Curb, Painted 50 100 LF 66.63 50 WSDOT Standard Specification Section 8-07 (except no 101 500 LF 4VM 101 rebar) COFW Development Standard 3-4A. COFW SP 8-07 501 + LF 29.16 501 B-4 Remove Pre-Cast, Block, or Extruded Curb (include asphalt 50 100 LF 63.33 50 patching if necessary) WSDOT Standard Specification Section 2-101 500 LF 51 88 101 02.313\. COFW SP 8-07 501 + LF 33.56 50 1 B-5 Crushed Surfacing Top Course, Include Haul 1 5 TON 2.164.88 1 WSDOT Standard Specification Section 4-04. 9-03 6 15 TON 433.50 6 COFW Snecial Provisi011 4-04 15 + TON 226.0 1 15 B-6 HMA Class 1/2" PG 64-22 1 5 TON 2.308.54 1 WSDOT Standard Specification Section 5-04 6 15 TON 770.95 6 COFW Special Provision 5-04 15 + TON 568.2 1 15' B-7 Speed Hump, Complete (includes toe grind and temporary 1 EA 6 .412..95 1 markings . Permanent signing and markings by others .) COFW 2 3 EA 7 .559.32 2 Develonment Standard 3-26 COFW SP 8-32 4 + EA lr.10 9.45 4 B·B Speed Table, Complete (includes toe grind and temporary 1 EA 8.4 12.!i:l 1 markings. Permanent signing and markings by others ) 2 3 EA 8.358.54 2 COFW Develooment Standard 3-27A, COFW SP 8-33 4 + EA 5.724.<1 1 4 B-9 Raised Crosswalk, Complete (includes toe grind and temporary 1 EA 9724.19 1 markings. Permanent signing and markings by others ) COFW 2 3 EA Develonment Standard 3-27 COFW SP A-11 4 + EA 8 ,000-85 2 5 ,581. hl 4 B-10 Remove Speed Hump, Speed Table, or Raised Crosswalk 1 EA 13 351 .36 1 (include asphalt patching if necessary) COFW SP 8-04 2 3 EA 10 ,031 .91 2 WSDOT Standard Specification Section 2-02.3(3) 4 + EA 7.752A7 ,1 B-11 Pedestrian Refuge Island, Complete (includes detectable 1 EA 37.803.85 1 warning strips) COFW SP 8-04 2 3 EA 28,988.!l2 2 COFW Development Standard 3-58 4 + EA 26 ,063.04 4 B-12 Remove Pedestrian Refuge Islands, Complete 1 EA 15 ,538.10 1 (include asphalt patching if necessary) COFW SP 8-04 2 3 EA 11 .aa3.a8 2 WSDOT Standard Specification Section 2-02.3(3) 4 + EA 9.538.59 4 B-13 Remove & Replace Concrete Curb Ramp, Complete 1 EA 14 ,468.50 1 COFW Development Standard 3-8, 3-BA, 3-BB, 3-10, 3-10A, 3-11, 2 3 EA 10 .239,93 2 WSDOT Std Plan F-40.14 (Up to 25 ft.) COFW SP 8-04, 8-14 4 + EA 9'.912.1 3 4 B-14 Remove & Replace Concrete Sidewalk, Complete 5 10 SY 1.5<!2.13 5 COFW Development Standard 3-3 & 3-12 11 50 SY 1.44 3.47 11 COFW Soecial Provision 8-04, 8-14 51 + SY 6<1 7.07 5 1 B-15 Remove & Replace Concrete Curb & Gutter, Complete 10 30 LF 938.25 10 (includes sawcutting, disposal, ashpalt patching) COFW Dwg 3-4, 31 100 LF 473.28 31 3-4A & WSDOT Stnd Soec. 5-04 3(14\, COFW SP 8-04 101 + LF 333 76 101 B -167 Traffic Circle Island, Complete (includes painted pre-cast curb, Diam.(ft) ~ pavement removal, monument case & valve box adjustment, 10' -16' 1 EA 27,189.8 5 1 topsoil Each ( 1) island by Circle Diameter range in feet) COFW 17' -24' 1 EA 27.542.0 1 I Devel""~~nt Standard 3 ,59 rn<=W SP A.nA 25' • 32' 1 EA 2.8 .066.85 1 Total of Schedule B - Adiusted Total of Schedule B' x 0 .10 ~ Total (Total of Schndule A+ Ad)ustod Total ol Schedulo Bl Exhibit A, Schedule B Notes: 6 Line Item Total for Schedule Bare calculated by multiplying the quantity range minimum by the unit price, except for item 8-16. 7 Unit Price is per Each for a Traffic Circle Island, Complete within the circle diameter range, in feet 8 Adjusted (weighted) Total reflects likelihood that only 10% of discretionary work in Schedule B will be requested . Note: The contract resulting from this RFQ is mainly tor future discretionary work orders; exact quantities and locations are unknown. The City's recent historical average for this work is approximately $25,000 per year. Discretionary work orders are typically issued multiple times throughout the calendar year . 2 5 111 AA As hallln ' LLC November 18, 201 5 Total Unit Price Multiplier Total $15,118.64 $5,997.00 2 $11,994.00 $9,724.19 $8,627.00 1 $8,627.00 $28,066.65 $35,200.00 1 $35,200.00 $52,909.48 " $55.821 00 Total Unit Prlco Multiplier Total" $9.152 .00 90.00. 50 54.500.00 $12.408.86 85 .00 101 $8,585.00 $37,444 74 80.00 501 $40,080.00 $9.645.50 00 .00 50 $4 .500.00 $14,169.29 BS .GO 101 $8,585 00 $40,981 .80 8 0.00 50 1 $40 080.00 $3.331 .50 55.00 50 $2,750.00 $4 ,286.44 52.50 101 $5,302.50 $14609.16 50 .00 50 1 $25.050.00 $3,166.50 51,1)0 50 $2 .550.00 $5,239 .88 48.00 101 $4,848 .00 $16 813.56 4500 501 $22 545.00 $2.184.88 250.00 1 $250 .00 $2,601.00 200.00 6 $1,200.00 $3.390 .15 150.00 '15 S2 250.00 $2,308 54 <100 .00 1 $400.00 $4,625 .70 300.00 6 $1 ,800.00 $8.493.15 200.00 15 $3.000.00 :)ll.41:.t.95 5 997.00 , ~.997 .00 $15,118.~ 5.997 .00 2 $11 ,994 ,00 $26.837.80 55n.OO 4 $22 308.00 $8,412.95 8 .627 .00 1 $8,627.00 $16,717 ,08 8 .6 27 .00 2 $17 ,254 .00 $22 897 .64 8,2.27 .00 4 $32.908.00 !>9 ,724 .19 8 827 .00 1 ~.O~(.W $16,001 .70 8.627.00 2 $17,254 .00 $22.324.76 8 .227.00 4 $32 ,908.00 $13.351 .36 11.000.00 1 $11 ,000.00 $20,063,82 11 ,000.00 2 $22,000.00 $31,009 .88 10.500.00 4 $42 000.00 $37,803 .85 17750.00 1 $17.750 00 $57,977.84 17,500.00 2 $35,000.00 $104 332.16 17.250.00 4 S69.000.00 $15,538 ,10 15,000.00 1 $15,000 .00 $23,766 .76 14';500 .00 2 $29,000 .00 $38 154 .36 H.000.00 4 S56 .000.00 $14 ,488.50 4.000 .00 1 $4 ,000.00 $20,479.86 S,750.00 2 $7,500.00 $39,890.92 3 ,500.00 4 $14 ,000.00 $7 .710.65 420.00 5 $2, 100.00 $15,878.17 4.0000 11 $4.400 00 $33.000.57 38-0 00 5 1 S19 380.00 $9,382 .50 360.00 10 SS .600.00 $14,671 .00 34 0 .0Q 31 $10,540.00 $33,709 _70 320.0Q 101 $32 .320.00 $27, 189.65 34 ,200.00 1 $34,200 00 $27,542.01 34.700.o(l 1 $34,700.00 $2.8066 .65 35 200.00 1 $35 200.00 $955.288 79 ~ $834 ,842 .50 $95,528.88 " $83,484.25 $148,438.36! $139,305.25! 11/20/2015 N "' EXHIBIT B -Previous Contract Unit Price Comparison REQUEST FOR QUOTE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 2016-17 Neighborhood Traffic Safety (NTS) Program Vendor Name: Date Prepared: -··-... ·---..-.., .................. ,,_ ........... ~,._-" ...... '"' ....... '""""" ................ , ....... Item "Typlal"Ptojod Unit Quanlitv S-7 ~ Hump, Co,npk!te (~s toe grind and Lem~ markings Permanent t.ilgn'r.ng and mark.tng& by oU,eq.,,J COFW 2 Deve-nt SU,,C on! l-26 COFW SP &.3ll EA B-9 Rai1,a,d C,ouwillk,. Completu (includes toe Qt'W'ld tnd ternpQral')' markings Permanent ~ng and markings by others ) CO.:W I Dow!comm St•nOard l-27 OOFW SP 8-3.3 EA 8-1ff' Traffic Circle Island, Complete (includes palril....-O ~ Qlfb, )24""' ·I pavement removal. monument case & valve be»:~~ topsoil Each (1) i~nd by Circle Diameter range in feel) C0FW Ola,,....., 1 ~ Slandiin!3-59 COFW Sl'll-04 Cin:le EA --·~--~ .... ··--~· ---· -...... . -----· ... -.. Item Quantity Range Unit s-, Pro,.Cn.t Traffic Curb; Pol nla:d so 100 Lf WSOOT Standard Specification Section S.07 101 500 LF COFW $=0 • Provision 8-07 501 • Lf B-2 9.lockTt'M.flc: Curb, PID11tod so 1 00 LF COFW Oevelopmenl Standard 3-4 101 500 LF COl'WS-l~ 8-07 !i(l1 • Lf 9 .3_ EJttruded Curb. Painted 50 100 LF WSDOT Standard Specification Section B-07 (c,xetpr no 101 500 LF ,-,1 COFW Da,.,........_, SLDndon! 3--4 A. COFW S P 8-07 501 • LF B-C Remove Pr·..C~s:t. Block. or Extrvckd Curb (fncJuda a.sph.a:11 50 100 LF ?iftctit.g. i( necessal)') WSDOT Standard Specification Section 2-101 500 LF 02.313\.-~SP -ll-07 501 + LF s.s Crus.hed Surf.clng Tot) Coura.e, lndudo H1\i.l 1 5 lON WSDOT Standard Specification Section 4-04, 9-03 6 i5 TON COFW c-•• Pt-4<04 15 • TON B-fi Hr.IA Clou llr PG 64-22 1 5 TON WSDOT Standard Specification Section 5-04 6 15 TON CO FW SrJ1teta1 Pf&11!.lon S-0.1 1S• TON 8-7 Speed Hump. Complete. r-toe gnnd and te,npor.,ty I tA markings. Permanent signing and rnartungsbyofhort,) COFW 2 3 EA '"'---'-~-.~. t--'"-,.,..""' .. •-C:P""" .. EA 8-8 Sl'ffd Tabie. Complete Onc:ludes l oe grind and lemporary 1 EA ~ Permanent signing and m~1'1d1,a$ by others .) 2 3 EA COf'W 0-,..........,, S-n! l-27A COfW sP 8"33 . . EA 9.9 Ra!=! Cros•wllk. Compk,ta (includes loe grind ond lem-1 eA markings Permanent ~ and ~r$rings by others.) COFW 2 J EA n--·---~ • ..,.. ___ _. __ ~ -.. ...... r.nr:w ~g ft """' .. EA 8-10 Ro-move Speed liu mn. Spoed Tabkt, otR,aised CrO!iSWolk 1 EA (include asphalt palching i1 t18'CCS5a,Y) COFW SP a,.o..; 2 3 EA W SDOT S 1•nda'1! s-fk:tillon S ocioo 2-lr.!.3!31 4. EA 8-11 Pedestrian Rofugo .. land, COnlPlole ronc:1ooat 4<!"""'1bicl 1 EA warning stnps) COFW SF' 8-04 2 3 EA """"'0."""'""""'' Slandllld 3-58 . . EA B-12 RafflOYI Pu~trbn Refuge 1.lil.andl, CcwnP'eto 1 EA ~~T";=~::::=~._;';8-0< 2 3 EA .. EA 8-13 Rrrnc>Ye & 1'oolt<:e Conacte Curl> Ramp, Complete 1 EA COFW Do,,olopmeo1 S ..-..S3-8. 3-8A, UB.3-10. 3-IOA. 3-1 I , 2 J EA WSCXJT S ul Plan F-00.14 OUo 10 25 n I COFWSP 8-04 8-1< ·-EA 8·1' RemOYO & R11placo Concrete-Sldcwalk., Complete 5 10 SY COFW Development Standard 3·3 & 3-12 11 50 SY COFW s-AI Pro~·--8-14 51 • SY 8-15 ~~ & Repl.a.ce. ~ctl!lO Cutt> & Gutle!r, Complata 10 30 LF {includes saWcutHng, disposal, ashpalt tialchiogi) COFW Dwg 3-4, 3 31 100 LF 41\&wc:.nnt·c-s-'-1\,l 'll1il l cncwsp JLJW. 10) • LF a.1r/ Tfilff"ic Crfc'* ll lond, Comp1oto {indudes painled pre.Q~ curb, .ll!l!!!.!!il l2!lm!ll!l pavement removal, monument case & valve box adjustment. 10'·16" l EA topsoil . Each ( 1) island by Circle Diameter range in feet) COFW IT-24" EA n. .. -•---.~•-.....1 --' .. tn ,.#"'lrt.u~•-#u 25•.,,-1 EA 201.6-17 Low Bidder AAAs""•ttioa LL C -.i,.,1s201s- Unit Price Multiplier Total $5 99; 00 $11 ,994.01 58.62' 00 1 $8.627.00 535,200 00 I $35,200 00 Unit Price Multlplier Total8 90.Ct 50 $4,500 00 es O(J 101 $8,565 00 ao a., 501 $40.0SOaOO 90.'10 so $4,30000 8500 101 sa ~oo eO DO SO I S.SO O&ltOO 55..0V 50 $2,750 00 52 50 101 $5,302 50 ;1>.00 501 $25 050..00 SH!!': 50 $2,550 00 48 00 101 $4,848.DO 45.00 501 $22.545,00 -!i'50..:10 • $250.00 m,100 6 S1.200 00 l :,,JJIO 15 $2 250.00 ,oo o~ l SolQ().00 300 oc 6 :~·=: 200.00 15 !i:F'l .W ~,,., ... --... 2 $1 1.99•00 ~.moo 4 $22 308.00 :a b:nf)O I 58 .627.00 a .&V JJJ 2 $17_251 .0( ·= 00 . S32 908.00 At.'"'?·~ I sa.ev:oo 11.r.TT .00 2 $17,25<.00 o,mrn 4 S32-·oo ,1 J)000 • $11.000.00 !1,0,:,000 2 rn.00000 J.o:=-~ • S42000.00 "· :,(l"C,() I $17,7 5Q.OO 'l,f..DC ,W 2 SJS.000.00 11Wl.o:J . S69 000.00 l.5:wt.-00 $1 5.000.00 Jll..&11)00 2 529.000.00 Ml!t'W>O • SM.000.00 tj)W.O!t) 1 $4.000.00 J.,5'>.00 2 S7.SOO.OO -UOl>.<>ll ,I 5 14 000 00 •211-00 6 S2 ,10000 -1')000 11 $4 ,A OO.OO ;JBQ,:,O 51 S 19 36000 ~-00 10 $3.600 00 :i<n.oo 31 S1 0 .5"00() .)2000 101 S--J2 '=- 3'4.200.00 ' $34.200.00 Sol 70000 1 $34.700.0D ~·.s.J I $35200,M Average Increase of 2016-17 Low Bid Unit Cost over previous contracts 2014-15 Contract 2012-13 Contract 2009-11 Contract I A,•nlulil1 PM.di Sus:tems Nonhwes1 .a.cruo.:an ITon'lll Und h"'......,, Morcll2L2!l1• ltdi,Y 8 2C12 .,.., ....... 2, 2009 2016'11 Unit Price Multiplier Total -ff' Unit Price Multiplier Total w•n Unit Price -----Multiplier Total 20% ~:.000.00 2 $10 000 00 146% S2 440 00 2 $4 ,380 01 186% 52.rna tiO 2 S. 200 00 73%, t5 00U 00 1 $5,000 00 198% 52,391 00 1 $2.891 OCI 232%, $2 &)Q C·Q 52 ,f;OO O( ffl -0 1 $0.00 JS !lll \ $0 00 ll)GQ S0.00 2G11i'-1l Multiplier Tota!' 2ll1~ff Multiplier Total1 20!6-17 Multiplier Total1 -Unit Price -Unit Price -Unit Price so so 00 2QO",; Sq(,<) 50 Sl 500 00 125% J.l,!O,.J !\!' 52.000 .00 240% ""'"° 101 S2.525 oa 1!18% ~50 101 $2,878 50 113% -~01 $4,04000 220% ~ 501 $12 525.00 •33% ':.100 50'i $751500 11_6% .-!"~ !,!)• 5 •8.531.00 50 SO.GO 50% &00 50 $3.000,00 ·~ -ICGI so S2.CIOOOO 24C,; a_,;,;i 10 1 S2.525.00 "67% •J!..00 101 SI .SlS.00 11~ tt~..:-:i 101 1' 040.00 220% =-0 501 S I? 525.00 •l3'1. f6.CQ 501 57.515.00 116'. o-oo ~I 51 8.537.00 50 $0 00 175% 20:00 50 $1.000 00 29311, ·~<IG 50 S70000 3380/t 12.00 ~ o, $1,212.00 4 25% 1"18) 101 s 1.010 oa 27~ ."--'"' io, $1,41 W 00 317°/, ,am 501 $6.012 .00 1567% :n)d 501 $1 503.00 317"4 ·~ .50 ' S60'200 50 $0.00 596% 7 ~ 50 S-366 !iO 1 175% .&«, 50 520000 380% •Q(,,) 101 S1.010 00 2774% ,q 101 5 168.67 1324% -3..:;?: ,o, $3<1D37 350% 10.00 501 $5 010 00 4400% I 00 501 $51)1 .00 1567% .l;;) 501 ~·~-10 ·29% JSC:.-00 S350 oa 400% s,.;,:iQ 1 SS0.00 793% ,,Cl! $2800 100% 'll<liil 6 $600 00 900o/. 2D t,J 6 s,2000 GU% ZS.00 6 '$.16800 650% 20 C'.: \5 $300.00 2400% 6 00 15 !.90.00 4:!6li 28 !!'1 IS $420 00 -33% 600 00 1 S60000 33% 300.J:<l 1 SJ00.00 122% '1BQ_ ,n $18000 100'/, 15C Oll 1i ,__sooo.oo 200% 100 t;O 6 S600.00 76% 170 t'O 6 $1.020.00 3.1% 150-.Cil 15 S; ,_. ... OCI 100% 100 00 15 S I.S00.00 2S'lo '.60 00 1E $2.400.00 ;,,•"lno.i::.. • S~OO<lw l4o-. :::.4'10 uu 1 SZ.44ow 1Wk ._ IOO.O . $2 100 QC 20'~ ~w 2 $>0.000 00 """ -~!XI 2 S<,880 00 186% !c. "7µ~ .. 2 $4,200 00 12;% 2,r nr • S9.ll0e.OO 1~ 2.440.00 ' sg 780 oo 166% _11j-:\OO • J.B 400 00 73'1, ='t9'..:!r' , Sli,000.00 198% 2.891 oc S2.891 .00 =~ ~@CC 52.6 00 00 2 $0.00 198% 2,891.00 2 s,.1a2 .oo 232'11. ·~..,.,()<.) 2 $5.200 DD ,ge.,. l_'"jT,~ • Sn 108.00 185',I: 2.891.0Q • s n.361.00 216~~ ';~ • $1040000 "'" -~·~.JW. I ~.000.00 I ,.~1 .·Xl 1 0.,,!!911l<l "232% !Lu.· .. ·~-' S2.60000 2 SO .CIO ,~,; 2,39~ .co 2 55,7$2.00 232% ..hlL-"'l 2 ~00 19e'I', .,..,.,,.GO . $11 ,108.00 1851. ;1.~91 .00 ' $1 1.564.00 Zle')(, ~!i(;;.JIO • $10.400.00 120% ,,:>;'Jllll 1 55,00000 241% :,.= S3.2JO.OO 1533% ·~~ $1.60000 2 $000 2 S0 .00 533% -~ ~ 5.3,000 .00 :zso,. l.1!00 '"1 • $12000.00 37~ :.'..ll&lo!;(I t SS .76000 !!00% ,.-ro . SS 000,00 18'4 ~ru;,«u:il • $10,000,00 407% l-c!l<>'l.CX, I $3.500.00 50.00 2 511.00 2 Sll 00 50.00 2<5%. C:.,r-',>(1:00 4 ~0000.00 SJSI,, .i..t-~~00 • s,o.eso.oo 4 SQOO l S0.00 $0 00 I SO OD $0 DO 2 so oa SD 00 • $0 00 • $0.00 . $0 00 sooo 50,00 !000 2 50-00 7 sooo ) ~-00 • sooo ~ saoo .. SO.DO ·58% Cliil.a,) s SS.000.00 .20,, F:?3-00 s $2,6 15-00 ·51% ~l'(J ~ SA ,2SO 00 33lo 30090 11 SJ.30000 1'11 1311"'1 " S,,,:,-36?.«J 81'. ~M S2.640 00 21% Jl:tljiil 5 1 $15:;oD.OO -4 % OOi 00 ~· $20147,00 68":,1. 14000 S1 s12.2,o oo IC S0.00 10 sooo 10 $01)1) 3; sooo 31 $0.00 ll $000 101 S0 .00 101 S0.00 ,0 1 SO .DO 1 so 00 $0 00 $0 OD 1 $0 00 so 00 $0 00 1 S0.00 ' SO .GO I SD 00 162% over 2014-2015 Contract 555% over 2012-2013 Contract 350% over 2009-2011 Contract 111 11/20/2015 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 5, 2016 ----ITEM#: ----,,=--=~ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: ORDINANCE: Amending Chapter 19.45 Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) -Variances POLICY QUESTION: Should the City amend the zoning variance procedures to allow administrative variances for requests that do not exceed 25 percent of the measurable standard. COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee CATEGORY: D Consent D City Council Business r8J Ordinance D Resolution STAFF REPORT BY: Matt Herrera , AICP-Senior Planner ___ _ Attachments: I. Updated LUTC Memorandum. 2 . Updated Draft ordinance. 3. Planning Commission Pub I ic Hearing Packet (Oct. 7, 2015). Options Considered: MEETING DATE: Dec. 7, 2015 D D Public Hearing Other DEPT: Community Development --------- I. Adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation as further amended by the LUTC as shown in the updated draft ordinance; 2 . Do not adopt the. amended recommendation and provide direction to staff. CHIEF OF STAFF: COMMITTEE RECOMME DATION: I move to forward the proposed ordinance to First Reading on January 5, 2016 Bob Celski, Chair PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION(S): Kelly Maloney, Committee Member Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Committee Member l 5 T READING OF ORDINANCE (DATE): "/ move to forward approval of the ordinance to th e January 19 , 2016 Council Meetingfor enactment." 2 ND READING OF ORDINANCE (DATE): "/ move approval of the proposed ordinance. " (B ELOW TO B E OM PlETEV B Y CI T Y CLERKS OFFJ E} COllNCIL A CTION : O APPROVED D DENIED D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION O MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordin an ce s only) REVISE D -1/2015 27 COllNCIL BILL# 151 reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION# DATE: TO: VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM November 24, 2015 Land Use and Transportation Committee Jim Ferrell, Mayor Matt Herrera, AICP -Senior Planner Variance Procedure Text Amendment BACKGROUND: The City provides a mechanism for property owners to apply for variances to the Zoning and Development Code. Variances are only approved for hardships due to special circumstances relating to size, topography, location, or surroundings of their lot or parcel that result in property owners being unable to build improvements that are typical of that area. Four specific criteria need to be met in order to obtain variance approval. The Community Development Department currently processes variances via the City's contracted Hearing Examiner . This process requires a public hearing, two notice periods, and up to I 0-business days following the hearing for a decision . This type of decision-making process adds additional time and costs to applicants and the City compared to the administrative land use review procedure. Update -During the November 2, 2015, LUTC meeting, the committee requested that staff amend the ordinance to provide additional opportunity for citizen comment. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The proposed text amendment allows administrative variances issued by the Community Development Director for variances up to 25 percent from code requirements. For example, a single-family homeowner who applies for a variance to reduce their 20-foot front yard setback to a 15-foot setback due to hardship would qualify for an administrative review process. No changes to the approval criteria are proposed . The text amendment is procedural only . The existing public hearing and Hearing Examiner approval procedure would remain in place for variance requests exceeding the 25 percent threshold. Update -The Mayor's recommendation now provides an additional notice period prior ·to issuing an administrative variance decision . A Notice of Impending Decision will be issued at least 15-days prior to an administrative variance decision . The amended recommendation now provides two notice periods (Notice of Application and Notice of Impending Decision) that will follow administrative land use permit distribution methods . The Mayor recommends the proposed code amendment be adopted by City Council. 28 ORDINANCE NO. ---- AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to variances; amending FWRC 19.45.010 and 19.45.020; and adding a new section to Chapter 19.45 FWRC. (Amending Ordinance Nos. 90- 43 and 97-291) WHEREAS, the City recognizes the need to periodically modify Title 19 of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC), "Zoning and Development Code," in order to conform to state and federal law, codify administrative practices, clarify and update zoning regulations as deemed necessary, and improve the efficiency of the regulations and the development review process; and WHEREAS, this ordinance, containing amendments to development regulations and the text of Title 19 FWRC, has complied with Process VI review, Chapter 19 .80 FWRC, pursuant to Chapter 19.35 FWRC; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the City Council to adopt a new administrative variance procedure for proposals that do not exceed 25 percent of the measurable zoning standard within the City of Federal Way; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments provide an efficient and timely decision making process; and · WHEREAS, the proposed amendments relate to governmental procedures containing no substantive standards respecting use or modification of the environment; therefore, the proposed amendments are categorically exempt from environmental threshold determination requirements delineated in WAC 197-11-800(19); and Ordinance No. 15- 29 Page I of 5 Rev 1/15 LU WHEREAS, the Planning Commission properly conducted a duly noticed public hearing on these code amendments on October 7, 2015, and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Land Use/Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered these code amendments on November 2, 2015 and requested staff include provisions for a second notice period prior to issuing an administrative variance decision; and WHEREAS, the Land Use/Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered these code amendments on December 7, 2015, and recommended adoption of the text amendments. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Findings. The City Council of the City of Federal Way makes the following findings with respect to the proposed amendments. (a) These code amendments are in the best interest of the residents of the City and will benefit the City as a whole by making the variance process more efficient. (b) These code amendments comply with Chapter 36.70A RCW, Growth Management. ( c) These code amendments are consistent with the intent and purpose of Title 19 FWRC and will implement and are consistent with the applicable provisions of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. ( d) These code amendments bear a substantial relationship to, and will protect and not adversely affect, the public health, safety, and welfare. Ordinance No. 15-__ 30 Page 2 of 5 Rev 1/15 LU (e) These code amendments have followed the proper procedure required under the FWRC. Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to chapter 19.80 FWRC and Chapter 19.35 FWRC, and based upon the recitals and the findings set forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the adoption of the proposed amendments: (a) The proposed FWRC amendments are consistent with, and substantially implement, the following Federal Way Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: LUG2 Develop an efficient and timely development review process based on a public/private partnership. LUP4 Maximize efficiency of the development review process. LUP6 Conduct regular reviews of development regulations to determine how to improve upon the permit review process. EDP2 Periodically monitor local and regional trends to be able to adjust plans, policies, and programs. (b) The proposed FWRC amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, and welfare because it provides timely decision-making for applicants who may have unique hardships in developing a particular property. ( c) The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the public and the residents of the City of Federal Way because it streamlines decision-making and reduces costs for applicants and the city. Section 3. FWRC 19.45.010 is hereby amended to read as follows: 19.45.010 Procedure generally. Ordinance No. 15- 31 Page 3 of 5 Rev 1/15 LU The city will use process IV, Chapter 19.70 FWRC, to review and decide upon an application for a variance-;-, with the exception of an administrative variance pursuant to FWRC 19.45.015 in which case the city will use process III, Chapter 19.65 FWRC. Section 4. Chapter 19.45 of the Federal Way Revised Code is hereby amended to add a new section "Administrative variance" to read as follows: 19.45.015 Administrative variance (1) Scope. The community development director may grant a variance that does not exceed 25 percent of the measurable standard. (2) Additional notice. A notice of impending decision shall be issued with content items and distribution methods set forth in FWRC 19 .65.070 at least 15-days prior to the director s decision. Section 5. FWRC 19.45.020 is hereby amended to read as follows: 19.45.020 Application information. In addition to the application materials required in Chapter 19.65 FWRC or Chapter 19.70 FWRC, the applicant shall submit a completed application on the form provided by the department of community development department, along with all of the information listed on that form. Section 6. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to any other persons or circumstances. Section 7. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto. Section 8. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Ordinance No. I 5- 32 Page 4 of 5 Rev 1/15 LU Section 9. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five (5) days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this ____ day of --------' 20_ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, JIM FERRELL ATTEST: CITY CLERK, STEPHANIE COURTNEY, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, AMY JO PEARSALL FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO.: Ordinance No. 15- 33 Page 5 of 5 Rev 1/15 LU To: VIA: FROM: DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION MEMORANDUM Tom Medhurst, Chair of the Federal Way Planning Commission Michael A. Morales, Community Development Director Matthew Herrera, AICP, Senior Planner Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager September 30, 2015 SUBJECT: Zoning and Development Code Text Amendments Related to Variance Procedures HEARING DATE: October 7, 2015 I A. POLICY QUESTION Should the City allow an administrative process for variances to provisions of the zoning and development code? I B. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION The Mayor recommends allowing administrative variances in limited circumstances by allowing up to 25 percent relief to zoning code requirements such as setbacks, lot coverage, lot size, and height. I c. ATTACHMENTS • Exhibit A -Proposed Text Amendments to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" • Exhibit B -Jurisdictional Comparisons • Exhibit C -Stakeholder Group Notification D. StlMMARY This city-initiated proposal is an effort to streamline decision-making procedures in the zoning code and reduce costs associated with the use of the city's third party Hearing Examiner. Current review procedures require all variances to zoning regulations be issued by the city's contracted Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner presides over a public hearing on the variance and then is allowed I 0-working days following the hearing to issue a written decision. Planning Commission Staff Report Variance Procedures Text Amendment 34 October 7, 2015 Page I The Mayor's recommendation allows administrative variances issued by the Community Development Director for variances of up to 25 percent from code requirements. The result of this text amendment would provide timelier decision-making and reduced costs for the city, while preserving the ability for public hearings presided over by the Hearing Examiner for significant variances or if an administrative variance decision is appealed. I E. ANALYSIS OF RECOMMENDATION Current Practice Cities that administer zoning regulations provide a mechanism to allow relief from those regulations when they cause an undue hardship or the inability for a property owner to build improvements that are typical for that property. The City of Federal Way administers this relief by way of a variance. The city may grant a variance if all of the following four criteria can be met: 1. That the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located. 2. That the variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located. 3. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located. 4. That the special circumstances of the subject property are not the result of the actions of the owner of the subject property. The city's permitting database indicates that most variance applications have been associated with single-family residential improvements. Examples of variances that have been granted are instances related to lot coverage, 1 setbacks, lot size, and height. The current process to review variances is for staff to review the application and then provide an analysis and recommendation for approval or denial to the city's contracted Hearing Examiner. A public hearing is then scheduled where the Hearing Examiner presides and hears testimony. Following the hearing, the examiner is allowed I 0-working days to issue a decision. Proposed Changes The purpose of this text amendment is to allow an administrative decision by the Community Development Director for variance applications that request up to 25 percent relief of code requirements. All variance applications that exceed the above-referenced thresholds would remain Hearing Examiner decisions. This text amendment does not propose to amend any substantive decision-making criteria. If approved as presented, the text amendment only changes the decision- maker for those applications that are below the aforementioned thresholds. I Lot coverage is the amount of impervious surfaces the are allowed on a property. Planning Commission Staff Report Variance Procedures Text Amendment 35 October 7, 2015 Page2 The Community Development Department requested this item for Planning Commission consideration as a streamline and cost-saving measure. Processing time for applications that require a public hearing and Hearing Examiner decision is longer than administrative decisions, which are issued by the Community Development Director. This is due to additional noticing requirements, scheduling the public hearing with the Hearing Examiner, and the standard I 0-working day allowance provided to the examiner to issue the decision following the hearing. Additionally, the cost for public hearings is considerable. Staff resources to review and provide a recommendation along with the hourly rate and reimbursable for the Hearing Examiner to preside over the hearing and then issue a decision can exceed the permit fee the city takes in for a variance. The text amendment would allow an applicant to receive a decision on a variance application in a shorter time period with a cost savings to the city. Also, the proposal requires similar public notice requirements as the public hearing requires. The ability for citizens and neighbors to provide comments to the decision-maker for an administrative variance would remain under the proposed amendments. Existing public hearing and Hearing Examiner decision requirements would continue for significant variance requests (those over the thresholds) and any variance that is appealed. Providing a procedure for administrative variances is typical for local jurisdictions. As provided in the attached South King County City Comparison, five of the six surveyed cities provide administrative variances, with Renton and Burien processing all variances administratively. I F. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY The proposed text amendment is a procedural amendment to the zoning and development code and therefore exempt from an environmental threshold determination pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act Rules I 97-l l-800(19)(a). Public notice of the Planning Commission hearing was published in the Federal Way Mirror and posted on the city designated bulletin boards September 18, 2015. This staff report was issued on September 30, 2015, and emailed to members of the Planning Commission and department stakeholders. I G. BASIS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION FWRC Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code," Chapter 19.80, "Process VI Review," establishes a process and criteria for development regulation amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the role of the Planning Commission is as follows: · 1. To review and evaluate the proposed development regulation amendments. 2. To determine whether the proposed development regulation amendment meets the criteria provided by FWRC 19.80.130 (item H below). 3. To forward a recommendation to City Council regarding adoption of the proposed development regulation amendment. Planning Commission Staff Report Variance Procedures Text Amendment 36 October 7, 2015 Page 3 I H. DECISIONAL CRITERIA FWRC 19.80.130 provides criteria for development regulation amendments. The following section analyzes the compliance ofthe proposed amendments with the criteria provided by FWRC 19.80.130. The city may amend the text of the FWRC only if it finds that: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan. Staff Response -The proposed code amendment is consistent with the following goals and policies: LUG 2 -Develop an efficient and timely development review process based on a public/private partnership. LUP4 -Maximize efficiency of the development review process LUP6 -Conduct regular reviews of development regulations to determine how to improve upon the permit review process. EDP2 -Periodically monitor local and regional trends to be able to adjust plans, policies and programs. 2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare. Staff Response -The proposed code amendment bears a substantial relationship to public welfare as it provides timely decision-making for applicants that may have a unique hardship in developing a particular property. 3. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the city. Staff Response -The proposed code amendment is in the best interest of the city as it streamlines decision-making and reduces costs. I I. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Mayor recommends allowing administrative variances for up to 25 percent relief from code requirements as shown in Exhibit A. Consistent with the provisions of FWRC 19 .80.240; the Planning Commission may take the following actions regarding the proposed development regulation amendments: 1. Recommend to City Council adoption of the FWRC text amendments as proposed; 2. Modify the proposed FWRC text amendments and recommend to City Council adoption of the FWRC text amendments as modified; 3. Recommend to City Council that the proposed FWRC text amendments not be . adopted; or 4. Forward the proposed FWRC text amendments to City Council without a recommendation. Planning Commission Staff Report Variance Procedures Text Amendment 37 October 7, 2015 Page4 Sections: 19.45.010 Procedure generally. 19.45.015 Administrative variance. 19.45.020 Application information. 19 .45 .030 Criteria for grant. 19.45.040 Denial. 19.45.010 Procedure generally. Exhibit A Chap~er 19.45 Variances The city will use process IV, Chapter 19.70 FWRC, to review and decide upon an application for a varianc e~, with the exception of an administrative variance pursuant to FWRC 19.45.0 15 where the city will use process III, Chapter 19.65 FWRC. (Ord. No. 97-291, § 3, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 90-43, § 2(120.10), 2-27-90. Code 2001 § 22-196.) 19.45.015 Administrative variance The· commun ity development director may grant a variance that does not exceed 25 percent of the measurable standard. 19.45.020 Application information. In addition to the application materials required in Chapter 19.65 FWRC or Chapter 19.70 FWRC, the applicant shall submit a completed application on the form provided by the department of community · development department, along with all of the information listed on that form. (Ord. No. 90-43, § 2(120.15), 2-27-90. Code 2001 § 22-197.) 19.45.030 Criteria for grant. The city may grant the variance only ifit finds all of the following: ( 1) That the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located. (2) That the variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located. (3) That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located. (4) That the special circumstances of the subject property are not the result of the actions of the owner of the subject property. (Ord. No. 90-43, § 2(120.20), 2-27-90. Code 2001 § 22-198.) 19.45.040 Denial. The city may grant a variance to any of the provisions of this title except: (1) The city may not grant a variance to any provision establishing the uses that are permitted to locate or that may continue to operate in any zone; (2) The city may not grant a variance to any of the provisions of this chapter; (3) The city may not grant a variance to any of the procedural provisions of this title; and (4) The city may not grant a variance to any provision that specifically states that its requirements are not subject to variance. (Ord. No. 90-43, § 2(120.25), 2-27-90. Code 2001 § 22-199.) Planning Commission Staff Report Variance Procedures Text Amendment 38 October 7, 2015 Page 5 Exhibit B South King County City Comparison City Code Citation Federal Way 19.45.010 Auburn 18.70.015 Des Moines 18.35.070 Burien 18.65.085 Kent 15.09.042 Renton 4-9-250 Sea-Tac 15.22.020 Planning Commission Staff Report Variance Procedures Text Amendment Administrative No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 39 Terms All variances require Hearing Examiner decision. 25 % maximum for setbacks, lot coverage, lot width, and lot area. 50% for height. All others granted by Hearing Examiner. Hearing Examiner grants all variances. All variances administrative 25% maximum for setbacks, lot coverage, and building height. All others granted by the Hearing Examiner. All variances administrative, unless underlying permit requires Hearing Examiner decision. 20% maximum. Variances for height, aesthetics, equipment enclosure, PWSF freestanding pole height, and all other regulations over the 20% threshold require Hearing Examiner decision. October 7, 2015 Page 6 Exhibit C Stakeholder Group Notification Name Affiliation Alex Wilford Master Builders Association Bill Mccaffrey WJM Studio Bob Cooper . Lloyd Enterprises Bob Roper Citizen Chad Weiser OTAK Chris Ingham South King Fire & Rescue Cynthia Stanley Lee The Commons Dale A Roper The Roper Company Dave Thorstad Developer Gareth Roe BCRA Gil Hulsmann Abbey Road Group Gordon Goodsell South King Fire & Rescue Jeff Greene Greene Gassaway Jennifer Dovey Windermere John Bowman Lakehaven Utility District Mark Clirehugh GV A, Kidder, Mathews, Segner Mark Freitas Developer Mike Bailey LOG Architects Monte Powell Powell Homes Peter Townsend Citizen Rebecca Martin Federal Way Chamber Rod Leland Federal Way Public Schools Sam Pace Sea/KC Association of Realtors Tom Barghausen Barghausen Consulting Engineering Planning Commission Staff Report Variance Procedures Text Amendment 40 E-Mail awi I ford @ mbaks .com wjmccaffrey@comcast.net bobc@ l lo::tdenterg risesi nc.com bob. roger@ comcasl. nel chad.weiser@otak.com ch ri s.ingham @so uthkingfire .org clee@ tcafw.com rogerdale@aol.com d ltarc h it ect@ comcas t .net gro e@bcradesign.com gi I .hu lsmann @ abbeyroadgroug.com go rdon .goodse l !@so uth k i ngfi re .org jeffggarch@seanet.com jsdovey@windermere.com jbowman@lakehaven.org markc@gvakm.com markfccim@cs.com mike@ldgarchitects.com monte@gowell-homes.com getert8@me.com rmartin@federalwaychamber.com rleland@fwsd.wednet.edu samgace@concentric.net tbarghausen@barghausen.com October 7, 2015 Page 7 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 5, 2016 ---------- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water Quality Stormwater Capacity Agreement ITEM#: ====~ POLICY QUESTION: Should City of Federal Way enter into a binding Agreement with Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) to carry out Phase II permit implementation under the Water Quality Stormwater Capacity Grant? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015 CATEGORY: ~ Consent D Ordinance D Public Hearing D City Council Business D Resolution D Other STAFF REPORT BY: Theresa Thurlow, P .E_. S_t_1r_f:_ac_e_W_a_te_r_M_a_n_a,g..._e_r_J ..:_,y1 __ D_E_P_T_:_P_u_b_1i_· c_W_o_rk_s ___ _ Attachments: Options Considered: I. Authorize staff to proceed with acceptance of the DOE Water Quality Stormwater Capacity Agreement. 2. Do not authorize staff to proceed with acceptance of the DOE Water Quality Storm water Capacity Agreement and provide direction to staff. ------------- MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding option 1 to the Jantt' ry 5, 2016 Council Consent Agenda for approval. MAYOR APPROVAL: CHIEF OF STAFF: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: approval. Bob Cel s ki Chair 1 to the January 5, 2016 consent agenda for Kelly M a lo ney , Member Lydia Assefa-Dawson , Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "] move to authorize staff to proceed with acceptance of the DOE Water Quality Stormwater Capacity Agreement" (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: O APPROVED O DENIED O TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION O MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED -08/12/2010 41 COUNCIL BILL# l 5T reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION# DATE: TO: VIA: FROM: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM November 20, 2015 Land Use and Transportation Committee Jim Ferrell , Mayor Marwan Salloum, Public Works Director r:.:--~- Theresa Thurlow, Public Works Surface an ag e~ SUBJECT: Department of Ecology Water Quality Stormwater Capacity Grant BACKGROUND: In July, Council authorized the application for the 2016 Department of Ecology Water Quality Stormwater Capacity grant which is intended to assist with NPDES Phase II permit requirements in 2016. City of Federal Way Public Works Surface Water Management staff has received notification of grant award and subject grant agreement. cc: Project File Day File 42 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 5, 2016 ITEM#: ---- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Acceptance of the King County Flood Control District Sub-regional Opportunity Fund Award POLICY QUESTION: Should City of Federal Way accept the King County Flood Control District Sub-regional Opportunity Fund Award? COMMITTEE: Land Use & Transportation Committee CATEGORY: [2J Consent O City Council Business O Ordinance D Resolution MEETING DATE: Dec 7, 2015 D D Public Hearing Other STAFF REPO~'°!' BY : Theresa Thurlow, P.E. Surface Water Ma~ DEPT: Public Wo_r_k_s _____ _ Attachments: Options Considered: I. Authorize staff to proceed with acceptance of the King County Flood Control District Sub-regional opportunity fund award. 2. Do not authorize staff to proceed with acceptance of the King County Flood Control District Sub-regional ~ortuni!)'. fund award . MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding option 1 to the Jan Consent Agenda for approval. MAYOR APPROVAL: '4,Lf::!,r.. CJ.2 u L D.]_l}ECTOR APPROVA ~~ ~.1 "/;).!$'//~ \\ "Lo ,a- CHIEF OF STAFF: . V 1 • ,J J,/ >l ll />, . f COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: approval. 1 to the January 5, 2016 consent agenda for Bob Celski Chair Kelly Maloney Member Lydia Assefa-Daws on, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to authorize staff to proceed with acceptance of the King County Flood Control District Sub-regional opportunity fund award. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: O APPROVED O DENIED O TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION O MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED -08/12/2010 43 COUNCIL BILL# 15T reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION# DATE: TO: VIA: FROM: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM November 19, 2015 Land Use and Transportation Committee Jim Ferrell, Mayor ~ ---, Marwan Salloum, P.E., Public Works Director ~ . Theresa Thurlow, P.E., Public Works Surface Water Manager ~ SUBJECT: King Countv Flood Control District Sub-regional Opportunity Fund BACKGROUND: In September 2015 Council authorized Staff to proceed with the application for the King County Flood Control District Sub-regional Opportunity Fund in the amount of $350, 195. The requested project for this fund is the Marine Hills Conveyance System Repair with construction scheduled in 2016. Staff has received notification that the proposed project has been approved and may proceed with requests for reimbursement for costs incurred associated with subject project. cc : Project File Day File 44 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 5, 2016 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL ITEM#: :--::c=:-=---=----=- SUBJECT: Grant Funding for Transportation Improvement Projects -Authorization to Accept Grant Funding POLICY QUESTION: Should City Council authorize staff to accept 2015 Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Funding Program for Transportation Improvement Projects? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015 CATEGORY: ~ Consent D Ordinance D Public Hearing D City Council Business D Resolution D Other STAFF REP_9RT BY: _l ohn Mulke , P.E. Street Systems ManageP \l.,v'll-_ DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated December 7, 2015 Options Considered: · 1. Authorize staff to accept the grant funding under the 2015 Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Funding Program in the amount of $6,000,000 for the Pacific Highway S HOV Phase V (S340th Street to S 359th Street) Project. 2. Do not accept grant funding under the 2015 Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Funding Program in the amount of $6,000,000 for the Pacific Highway S HOV Phase V (S340th Street to S 359th Street) Project and provide direction to Staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option I to the January 5, 2 Agenda for approval. CHIEF OF STAFF: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option 1 to the January 5, 2016 Council Consent Agenda for approval. Bob Celski, Chair Kelly Maloney, Member Lydia Assefa-Dawson,Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "/ move to authorize staff to accept the grant jimding under the 2015 Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Funding Program in the amount of $6,000,000 for the Pacific Highway S HOV Phase V (S340th Street to S 359th Street) Project. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: O APPROVED O DENIED O TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION O MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinanc es only) REVISED -08/12/2010 45 COUNCIL BILL# lsT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION# DATE: TO: VIA: FROM: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM December 7, 2015 City Council Jim Ferrell, Mayor Matwan Salloum, P.E., Public Works Director ---~ John Mulkey, P.E., Street Systems Manager -'5qAv-- SUBJECT: Grant Funding for Transportation Improvement Projects -Authorization to Accept Grant Funding BACKGROUND: This memorandum provides the Council with the current status of the grant applications submitted in 2015 under 2015 Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Funding Program. Project (Funding Phase) Grant Pacific Highway S HOV Phase V (S340th Street to S 359th Street) (Construction) FY 2015 Urban Arterial Program (TIB) Estimated Project Cost $24,200,000 Awarded Grant Fund $6,000,000 Required City Match $4,000,000** ** The required City match will be obtained from the existing project grant funding that was awarded to the project in 2014 from PSRC in the amount of $7 ,000 ,000. K:\LUTC\2015\12-07-15 Acceptance of Grant Funding -Pacific Highway S HOV Phase V.doc 46 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ITEM#: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: S 352"d Street Extension from Enchanted Parkway South to Pacific Highway South Project -Bid Award POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council award the S 352nd Street Extension from Enchanted Parkway South to Pacific Highway S Project to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee CATEGORY: ~ Consent D City Council Business D Ordinance D Resolution MEETING DATE: Dec. 7, 2015 D D Public Hearing Other _S_!AFF REPORT Ji!: John M~~~<;:y 1 P.E., ~tE<;:<;:t. ~yst<;:1:!ls M<t!"li:igeE. _ J?~~!:_J>_ubl~ Wor~!-___ _ Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated December 7, 2015. South 352°d Street Extension from Enchanted Parkway South to Pacific Highway South Project Bid tabulation. Options Considered: 1. Award the South 352"d Street Extension from Enchanted Parkway South to Pacific Highway South Project to Scarsella Brothers, Inc., the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $2,722,199.96 and approve a 10% contingency of $272,220.00, for a total of $2,994,419.96, and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 2. Reject all bids for the South 352nd Street Extension from Enchanted Parkway South to Pacific _ .. Highway South Project and_ direct staff to rebid the project and return to Committee for further action. _ MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the January 5, 2016 City Council Consent Agenda for appro CHIEF OF STAFF: Committee Initial/Date Initial/Date Council Initial/Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Committee recommends forwarding Option 1 to the January 5, 2016 City Council consent agenda for approval. Bob Celski Chair Kelly Maloney, Member Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to authorize staff to award the South 352nd Street Extension from Enchanted Parkway South to Pacific Highway South Project to Scarsella Brothers, Inc., the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $2, 722,199 . 96 and approve a 10% contingency of $272,220.00, for a total of $2,994,419.96, and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. '· (BEL O W TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: O APPROVED O DENIED O TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION O MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinan ces only) REVISED -l /2015 47 COUNCIL BILL# 15T reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION # DATE: December 7, 2015 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee Jim Farrell, Mayor ~ Marwan Salloum, P.E., Public Works Director 0 VIA: FROM: John Mulkey, P.E., Street Systems Manager) 0- SUBJECT: S 352nd Street Extension Project from Enchanted Parkway South to Pacific Highway South -Bid Award BACKGROUND: Eleven bids were received and opened on December 1, 2015 for the S 352nd Street Extension Project from Enchanted Parkway South to Pacific Highway South Project; please see attached Bid Tabulation Summary. The lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Scarsella Brothers, Inc., with a total bid of $2,722,199.96. AVAILABLE FUNDING: The available budget for the S 352nd Street Extension Project from Enchanted Parkway South to Pacific Highway South Project is $6,552,400 and is comprised of the following: AVAILABLE FUNDING: Mitigation Fee TIB Funding Budgeted City Funds in 2016 Budgeted City Funds in 2008 Lakehaven Utility District TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES: $25,300 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 500,000 27,100 $6,552,400 The following is a breakdown of the estimated total project costs based on the low bid: Design Right-of-Way Acquisition Utility Relocation Intergovernmental Service (WSDOT & King County) 2015 Construction Cost 10% Construction Contingency Construction Management TOT AL PROJECT COSTS $550,000.00 $300,000.00 $100,000.00 $60,000 .00 $2, 722, 1 99. 96 $272,220.00 $565,000.00 $4,569,419.96 Total Project Costs are $1,982,980.04 less than Total Available Budget. k :\lutc\2015\ 12-07-15 s 352nd street extension -bid award.doc 4 8 S. 352ND STREET EXTENSION PROJECT (SR 161 TO SR 99) RFB No. 15--015 BID OPENING DATE DECEMBER 1, 2015 ...... "'" Bidl .. .. Bia! .... Bld7 Vendor Na~-·> Scarsella Bros _ Inc Tuc:c:, & Sons 1oc Johansen Eicavllng, Inc Actr.'e Conslluctlon Inc M1 IIIS ResotXces, LLC -c....--.. PaciflcCrvilandlnfraslll.JCl.ure --·---> Se.aWe..WA Tacoma WA e~.W A. Pu alluo.WA. Pu i,lluc,.WA L.au Stevlit$.. W A fed•t&LW~v .w./'<... ...... ..... Item Amount Unit Price Total Price Total p-Tolal Price Tot.al Price Total Price Total Price Total Sdledute A -RoadWay lmpt'OVmenlS 1 1-04 Unexpecltd Si te Changes I EST $30 000 00 SJO (QJ OO $30,000 00 Ul.()00 00 $30 000 00 $30,000 00 $30,000 00 $30000 00 $30,000 00 $JO,C00a) $30,000 00 SJO,<IOOOQ $30,000 00 s~.000 00 2 1-05 c~~,-o I LS $28.500 00 $28 50000 $25,000 00 $25,000 00 • $25,500 00 $25.50000 $25.000 00 $2500000 $31 .500 00 S:J.1.500.00 540.000 00 Mi.l,00003 $27 ,BO O 00 $27_80000 3 1-05 ~~M'lllAar:ortlDrawings ' LS $4,250 00 $4,250 00 $5,000 00 $5,00000 $4,150 00 $4 .15000 $4,000 00 $4 00000 sa .eoo oo ,a-.,oa, $10,000 00 1,0.00000 $4,600 00 $-4 60000 ' 1-07 SPCC Plan I LS $2,000 00 $2.00C 00 $1,500 00 $1 .50000 $500 00 $500 00 S100 00 $10000 $1 ,000 00 \IJ,)Xl,a) $875 00 $87500 $2,500 00 $250000 5 1-08 T)p,o B Progress Schedule (M11wnum b1d $5 C<lO) ' LS $5,000 00 $500000 $5,000 00 ss.coooo $5 000 00 $5 C:0000 55,000 00 $$.CIX)a) $5 .000 00 uoma, ss.ooo 00 $5,00000 $4~000 00 $4~000 DO 6 1-09 --I LS $265.000 00 ~""'"' $144 ,000 00 1.144.00).00 $185,500 00 $16550000 $333,818 66 SJ33,81866 $150,000 00 11 50..(XJOQ) $300,000 00 $300,000 00 $335,000 00 $335 coooo 7 1-09 F...cQr.q~ I LS $10.000 00 $100C:0CO $25 000 00 125!)00.l)(I S7 500 00 $7,5Q)OQ $16,500 00 516,;50)0) $1130000 111 ,XIOOO $24 ,600 00 $24,60000 $18,500 00 s1asoooo 6 l -10 ON OiA't Police Office, and Ca, I EST ss .ooo 00 S.S.O:X,(r, $5,000 00 l~.OCX>DO SS,000 00 S50:X,OO SS,000 00 .S 5,0Cl)CO $5 000 00 15.a,oa, SS 000 00 $5.00000 $5,000 00 ssooooo 9 1-1 0 l~ Conlrol S uper•isor , LS $100 000 00 l!OOOOOGI $95 000 00 ... .(XXIOQ $13 000 00 S11.CXXIIOO $1()() .,.,, $2 1,500 00 S.21,6.1000 sso.ooo 00 $60.000 00 $26 ,000 00 $26.00000 10 1-10 "-""'-,soc HR $0 01 ... "' $44 00 i21.l,20003 $47 so 1zo.oma, $43 00 120li ,,i(!Oa) $53 00 .s.25A,.COOOO $48 00 $23040000 $51 00 ~.i.&8'X)O) 11 1-10 Oii'* Tilk Conlrol Labor 1600 HR so 01 sreco $48 00 ~.<OIIGI $56 00 s.1~ecooo $43 00 sn . .0000 $53 00 $95.400CXI 551 00 $91 .60000 $51 00 191 ,IICO.CO 12 1·10 Orntil-tffls,c.t .. .,'1'.t.rt(;Conu(il , LS $150,000 00 SJ5Q,OCIO.O:, $25,000 00 S;!O,<IOOU) $22,500 00 S2l,'!Da) $500 00 '5000> $11 ,400 00 s11 ..COOO $14 ,000 00 hi&.CO;)(IJ $52,000 00 .s,,oa,a, 13 1-10 ~SignsCJass A ,so SF $15 00 >1..1500> $25 00 "'"""' $11 00 St~6!0-CO $34 00 S,$.10)(1tl $26 50 ~75.m $42 00 S&,XIOU, $4 5 00 16,75000 " 1-10 ~MOlti'Sig n 1600 HR $1 50 "-'°°"' $2 00 S).200(0 S3 50 S5,6Cllm $0 87 11 .m..oo $200 su:oa, ., 50 SS,OCOOO $1 75 suoom 15 1-10 Fm.aeilitCl'~~S19n 7200 HR $2 00 S\•~40000 $300 Sll,IJXIOO $2 75 $1Sl.800..00 $2 24 $16.12800 $325 '23.<0000 $2 50 118.0CODO $250 l,l!IJXIOOO 16 1-10 ~~&gn 3 EA $125 00 $31'$00 $150 00 "50a) $155 00 $46!5a) $650 00 US5000 $400 00 U ;a)CIO 5400 00 s1,,100..co $640 00 11 .92'001 ,, 2-01 OeMll'lql1n111 G rubb~ 1 LS 532.000 00 '32.00(la) $12.000 00 u2..coooa $12 000 00 i.12.QtllO, $50 ,0 00 00 sso_coooo ss1.soo oo ss, 500 .00 $75 ,000 00 m ,oo:u:o $28,000 00 ns.oco.oa 16 2-01 ROIOWGCI Cleanup 1 EST $10.000 00 :U O.oot\00 $10.000 00 S1D,m300 510,000 00 :no,co:ioo $10,000 00 s.·1000000 $1 0,000 00 l i0,CO)CO $10 ,000,00 nooccto $10,000 00 l,10.CCll)O:, 19 2-02 ll~.llal Slruclures and Obstruct10fls 1 LS $26,500 00 S"26!i00 .00 $40,000 00 MO.,COO.QJ $30 000 00 .S.30.CIXIOCI $42,000 DO $41.COO.OCI $73.300 DO 1-73..XIOOO $55,000 00 555.CICC@ $107 300 00 1101.lOGOO 20 2-02 -.... 2,480 LF $3 25 $$J)60a) $2 00 M.l160CXI $3 10 U.Rl!CIO $2 80 ..,.."' $2 50 $6.20000 $8 00 '1'8.!AOOO $2 00 S4.IIOOOO 21 2-02 ROffiO'it :m~w,g Catch Basin ' EA 5350 00 'S,3,15000 $4 00 00 ......,.., $480 00 """°"' $350 00 ».t SCOO $44 0 00 53,960 00 ssoo 00 $4.SOC,a) $500 00 $4,!looa, 22 2-02 RemowrA»naon Ex,s11ng Storm Sewer Pipe 330 LF $1500 "~-"' $12 00 $l.Sf,Oa) $16 50 ,s;"60<> $13 50 IA.-4SSOO S33 50 $11 .05500 $35 00 $11..56000 $22 00 >1.200.m 23 2-02 IUmcY&J and Retocahon of Ex1strng Pnvate Imp rovements 1 EST $5,000 00 ssc:ooa, $5,000 00 ss.om.c:o SS 000 00 5$.(Q)OO $5 000 00 l5AO)a) $5.000 00 SS .(XYJ OO $5 000 00 is,cooa, $5,000 00 l!OCOal 2, 2-03 Gt-~-4 8 0l'row Inc l Haul 7 500 TN $16 75 ,,'25.62500 $19 60 S1 '7.CXOOO $10 50 113Vsooo $16 00 $1 20.0COOO $15 20 S11•UlOOOO $10 45 n 3a,3750CI $1 2 00 SSiO,CCIOOO 25 2~03 Gl.aYOI Borrow lor Trench Bacld1il Incl Haul 1,11 0 TN $16 75 '1 19,'92.!,l;I $23 00 ~.$190> $21 00 SZl..311000 $15 00 116.SSOCIO $17 50 $19 ,425 00 $22 00 t1<~2DCXI 51 2 00 Stl.3200:,- 26 2-03 Roadway Excavat~n Incl Haul 5,800 CY $18 75 S1 09.150CO $25 70 S1 <9.<16COO $24 75 S1 UIWJOO $27 50 $1 5S ,15COOO $29 50 5171 ,100 00 $23 00 $133 • ..C:O(IO $32 00 $1e5.AOOQQ 27 2-03 Unsu1tatile Foundation E,c cavat1on incl Haul 230 CY $18 75 ,0)2$0 $25 00 ~"''°"' $42 00 ......... 00 S25 00 ~cc $59 00 $13,57000 S36 00 13.26<)a) $27 00 M..21000 28 2-09 Shoring or Extra Exca vation Class B 7 410 SF $0 01 $7-4 10 $0 25 $1.852$0 $0 30 ».=m $0 22 $1 ,63020 $0 55 J.4 .07SSO $1 00 S1.,1000 $0 10 n,, oo 29 2-09 Structure Excavation Clasi 8 Incl Haul for Structural Earth 21 30 CY $0 0 1 $21,0 $16 00 1:34.05000 $3000 "'3.9000Q $27 50 15651500 $3625 $77.)11:~ $27 00 .S57..5t000 $3000 583.5IO'JOO 30 2-09 Shoring o, Exua &cavauon Cl A 1 LS S1 00 uoo $100 00 $10000 $5,700 00 ~70000 $1 00 ., 00 $10,200 00 s ,0.20>.DO $12 500 00 s~zsoooo $1 00 ,u,o 31 4-04 C rus hed S urfacing Ta p Cours e 3 BBO TON 521 40 578,324 00 $29 45 $107.787 00 $30 50 511163000 $25 50 $9333000 $30 50 $1 11 .SJOaJ $24 00 S87.3'000 $25 00 $91 ,500,00 32 5-04 Temporary Pavement 120 TON $100 00 512 .00000 $130 00 S15.600 CIO $90 50 510 66000 $212 DO $25 44000 $147 00 $17,540.0) s1ao oo -521 «coo $120 00 ,.i.t4()0.(CI 33 5-04 HMA Cl 1/2" PG 64-22 4,100 TON $6610 $271 0,000 $64 15 $263,01500 $74 00 1303,40000 $7560 $309960 00 $74 00 UQ,,0000 $75 00 ,,01,110000 $68 00 $27880000 3< 5-04 Commt.i~I HMA PG 64-22 270 TON $89 00 524 030 00 $90 00 $24 30000 $100 00 S27 000 00 $101 00 $27 ,27000 $80 00 u1 ,eooco $95 00 12S.GSO.OO $110 00 $2970000 35 5-04 Pl,Wtlt'.Q Bitumma~ Pavemeni 1.650 SY $4 so 5742500 SS 00 $8_25000 $3 00 $4 95000 $7 00 $11 55000 SS 00 -.a.,,:Oa, $5 00 $825000 $6 00 $990000 i 6-1 3 Su,,,a-,1•1 Earth W all 5,790 SF S17 50 $101 32500 S25 00 1 1«.1!i0CO s 1a oo $10422000 $21 50 S,14·,&bll) $27 50 l159,22Sm $25 35 $146 77650 $2500 1144.75000 6-13 Modular Block W atl 360 SF $17 50 ,vooa, 12500 '"""'"' $22 75 $8_15000 $23 50 S8.@QJ $37 00 .Sil,l200Q $28 00 s10.oeooo $2300 $826000 6-13 Gnv.t Ba ck rill rar Struct ur al Earth Wa lt !net Haul 930 CY 127 50 µs.515a, $3000 u,pma, $2-'I 50 522.1!603 $31 00 t2a.030.m $33 50 -$3l, 155,00 $34 00 131 .620 00 $28 00 --"' 39 7-0< Ctus IV Remf Cone Sto rm Sewer P ipe 12 In Diam 1 510 LF $45 10 $68 .10100 $38 00 U7..;380CO $55 00 .a;,.ooom $47 00 S10Jl1000 $62 00 mma, $44 00 $664'(] 00 $56 00 -a, ,o 7-04 01n SO Ductile Ir.on Storm Sewer Pipe 12 In Diam so LF $58 70 SU>SOQ $50 00 s,.C,:,.a, $78 00 $3.tDOa) $100 00 'S5.000CO $130 00 ~,$Xia) $88 00 $4.-400.QO $60 00 ·S3.«o.m " 7-05 Tu,ncl'I Dram 90 LF $175 00 S15~'r$0,00 5154 00 $1 JeGOOO $135 00 $1 2,.I~ $145 00 s1 ~m $160 00 1,1,.@0) $165 00 S1"Jl6000 $190 00 $17 lQOO) ,2 7-05 Cartn Ba sm Type 1 22 EA $1,375 00 $30~a, $950 00 1:0.t(XIOQ $11 00 00 ,_oo s1.200 oo 126.<0llm $1,450 00 $31 ,9000:, $1 ,200 00 J 26....00CO $1 M800 00 139.60:IO) 43 7-05 Co!ch Basin Ty pe 1L 5 EA $1 ,500 00 SJJODOO $1 ,125 00 ... 1!2S_a) $1,275 00 S6..J7$00 $1 300 00 Sfml)a, $1 ,900 00 19!>0000 $1 ,300 00 sa.,c:oa, $1 ,950 00 S9 ?50CO 44 7-05 C-6\Cft Basin Type 2 48 In O,am , EA $2.900 00 ,u,oom $2 565 00 Sl.5850:, $2.200 00 $U<)Oa) SJ 200 00 S3-""'"' $2,500 00 S2,51X)a) $3,200 00 S3,2Cl0-00 $3 800 00 '3.aooa, ,s 7-05 Ca:Cfl Ba s in Typ e 2 60 In Dia m 1 EA $5.200 00 1S,200a) $4,785 00 M,re!ICXI $7,700 00 S?.70i!OQ $5,000 00 >5-a,oa, $10.309 00 S10,JC90l $6,200 00 -°" $5,200 00 u:ioom <6 7-05 AdJU(t E.m:il~ Storm Drainage Structure 2 EA $84 0 00 ,,.eaoa:i $500 00 s i.omoo $800 00 Si ,&:JOCO $500 00 1"1.0XIOO S440 00 18/lOa) $300 00 '""'-"' $1,800 00 $3.$0Qa) ,1 7-05 COMOCoon 10 E:iuiung, Cn-.nllfCI StJ~dtSUI 6 EA $605 00 U ,83000 $750 00 M.50:)0<> $1 075 00 ~450.CC $2,250 00 .$13,500Cll S2,600 00 $15,6Q70C, $550 00 s:),X,Oa, $3,010 00 .$18:00000 46 7-05 ~~~y = L::1~ R~r:t~~'": ud 14 EA $1 .700 00 m.eooa, $1,150 00 i:ur:,toooo $870 00 S12.t-8000 $700 00 19.SJOtlD $1,400 00 S-19,60000 $800 00 $11..20000 $1,415 00 .J 1g,a1oco 49 7-05 2 EA 51 ,940 00 S).80l)a) $1 ,700 00 SJ;,..OOOD $1 400 00 12.80000 $800 00 a,.&:000 $2,900 00 $5.80000 $1 .500 00 1.1,cooa, $3,560 00 J.7.l20IXI 50 7-16 MHlly F110 0.p.arunl.!'fli\ ~ 1 LS $3,610 00 $3..61003 $2,600 00 '2. .... 00 $2,375 00 12.)7500 $5.000 00 SS.CXlOOCI $4,100 00 $4,10000 $3,400 DO S.).40000 $3 ,590 00 S).'9C)a) 51 7-2 1 1l 1n ~n.nole C.ino;c Rcpl~Dl'l'l«li , LS $6,030 00 sa.mooo $4, 100 00 ~ ,0000 $5.000 00 >5.CICXIOO $6.300 00 Mt.:iX>OO $6,500 00 $6.50000 $4,200 00 .$4 .2(Xla) $5.200 00 ss_,aoa, 52 7-2 1 SlOtfflWltOf' r, .. tr!'141n1 Vat.rJC J.. 1 LS $60,865 00 -S60.86500 $56,000 00 556,000.00 $62,000 00 """"'"' $6100000 55 1.«liJC.O $65.000 00 $65,00000 $60,000 00 -a, $69,000 00 '690XUXI 53 7-21 Swmw;w Treatment Vault 8 , LS sea .soc oo seo,SlOm :£88 000 00 '6B,COOOO $90,000 00 S9D,0Xt00 $97.000 00 VJ?.OCOOO $97 500 00 $97.50000 $88,000 00 ... ,cooa, $98,000 00 \98.00000 54 7-21 Pretreatmem Unil 1 LS $14.000 00 11,&QCOCJP s15.ooo oo $15,00000 $13,500 00 $13.'!iOJO:, $15.500 00 S15,!CGOO $14,760 00 $14 ,760 00 $19 .000 00 '1-l.OOOOCI $18 300 00 ua.xooo 55 7-21 Pond Excavation 205 CY $25 00 SS 11;500 S43 00 Sl..~1SCO $49 00 l !QCMSOO $50 DO l tQZ5QOO $73 00 Ht:,Sl!i50CI $33 00 14,785a) $50 00 J t0,2SOIXI 56 7-21 Catch Basin lnserl far Spill Control 6 EA $100 00 ""'°"' $100 00 """"' $52 00 .. ,...,, $152 DO $1 .2'111,00 $45 00 "'"""' $200 00 it.tlOCI OCI $107 00 usooo 57 B-01 Eros ion Contro l ano Waler Pollu trn n Prevention 1 LS $10 000 00 l10.0COOO 515,000 00 f.15.000 .03 s2,.5oo oo S2 1~CO S45 ,000 00 "'-""'"" $38.500 00 >3&.5"'a) $57,000 00 057-CXI $33,000 00 S3)lX)Qa) 56 8-02 Topsoil Type A 31 0 CY $32 00 w.soom $32 00 SJ.920(0 $36 00 s1 1.uiOCO 136 00 S11.i60.CO 536 00 S1';1GC)CIO $32 00 ss,ma, $30 00 S:9,30000 59 8-02 Bark Mulch 32 CY $3600 $1 1520) $3600 s1.1!Q'm $40 00 1 1,ll.lOQ) $41 00 $1312.0l 5'100 $1,312.00 $32 00 SIJJl.COO $3000 i seoa, so 8-02 Sod Ins ta llation 1,300 SY $6 15 11.56500 $6 15 $7B500 '6 90 UJl,O(X) $7 00 59 10000 $7 00 S9.1ClHJO $6 00 l-1..80000 $5 20 SS.16003 s, 8-02 Detentio n Pond Seed Mlle 400 SY $3 45 s,..:,eoco $3 45 S1.,.JIOOQ $3 85 s1..54QCO "'00 Sl,60000 "'00 .U ,&:000 S3 00 11;20000 $2 10 .... "' 62 8-02 Seeded Lawn lnstellat1on 1,500 SY $1 00 $1 5)0.00 $1 00 $1.50000 $1 10 s1 ~.co $1 00 $1,50000 $115 ,,.nsoo $2 00 "-""'·"' s, 60 tt@OD 63 B-02 PSIPE Acer Rubrum 'Red Sunset'/ Red Sunset Maple 2 53 EA $321 00 S321 00 $361 00 $365 00 $360 00 $450 00 5395 00 i/2" Cal 12'-14' Hl S17~01lCM:1 $17 013 00 $19JJ:100 $19,34500 S1 9,P8;tl00 m.soocc s;o,,ma, 6' 8-02 PS IPE Parthenoc1ssus henry anaf S1 lverve m Creeper 112 EA $1 1 50 $1 _218800 $11 50 S1 28800 $12 90 $14&:4 80 $13 00 Sl 45600 $13 00 \US6..00 $18 DO "2.0U),00 $16 50 $1 &c.!OQ 65 8-02 Prope rty Resto rauo n 1 EST $10 000 00 $10.00000 $10,000 00 $10.00000 $10,000 00 J,10,CQQ.00 $10.000 00 $1 0.00000 s,o 000 00 s10000CO $10.000 00 SH).OC,:,00 $10,000 00 110,Cl'.IOCll BB 6--03 AULOtntlle lmga1 1o n S ys tem Complete 1 LS $40.000 00 ..o.ooom S40.000 00 $4000000 $44 ,000 00 '"°"'"' $45 000 00 145.00000 $44_630 00 S,,M ,U,,00 $46.000 00 S46.00l.OO 544.600 00 S.H,60000 67 8-03 U'ktnlt\lt., UM1ly Distri ct Co nnection Fees 1 EST $10.000 00 SlOOC(IOO $10 000 00 $10,000 00 $1 0,000 00 $1000000 $1 0 ,000 00 510,00000 $10,000 00 i 10,DOCICQ $10,000 00 '$10.00003 $10,000 00 '10,000.00 66 8-04 c.mtnl Cone Traffic Curb and Gutter 3.200 LF $11 00 $3520000 $8 00 $25 600 00 $8 i5 $26,08000 $14 ()() $4<1.60000 SS 15 .$26.DeOW $8 00 S25;15QOOO USO $24_00000 69 8-04 Exitu,U,O Curb Ty,pe 6 <80 LF $11 50 $5 ,52000 $7 00 $3.36000 $6 75 S3 24000 $7 00 $3,36000 $13 00 "6.2;U:10:, $7 so 03.$:Xl,a) $7 00 $336000 70 8-06 Cem-ent. Cane Driveway Entrance 3-Day 530 SY $47 20 S25~016 00 $30 00 $15,900 00 $38 00 $20.14000 $43 00 $22,79000 $34 so $1 15.28500 $32 00 11 5,if:iO.OD $35 00 $1855000 71 6-07 Prtct.i Dual Facad Slo pea Mo untable Curb 110 LF S28 00 SJ.oeo 00 $40 00 "4,-4CIOOO $45 00 .._ ... $45 00 ........ "' $3 1 75 D .~SO $43 00 $4,730 00 $40 00 14 ,400 00 72 6-09 R.tJid Pavement.Marker Type 2 3 HUN D $500 00 $1 ,50000 $350 00 1 1,C!OCIO S380 00 $1 ,14000 $390 00 11.t70<» S565 00 ll,6!il!5.W $360 00 $1080 00 $344 00 51 .03200 73 8-11 :::; :!;!!~ ~ec: T-,m1n4I 30 LF SSO 00 $1 .50000 $80 00 n.....a, $2200 $66000 .$137 00 S4.110.DO s e1 oo 12_-'30.CQ $77 00 $231000 $71 75 52,1 5250 1, 6-11 , EA S2 .500 00 12,50000 $2,600 00 ,u ,oom $2 ,200 00 $2200 00 s, 700 00 S1,1QlW $2.650 00 12,f60a) $2 .500 00 $250000 $2.320 00 $2320 00 75 6-12 Br•tk\t1t1.fl Coa1Mc:r,.,.,.1.Jr1Jr F~ 1,060 LF $29 52 Dl ,88\l.O $30 00 ~""'"' $32 50 $35.10000 $33 50 .$36 ,l!IOCO $33 25 SJS.11000 $32 00 134 .56000 $33 20 $35,85&.00 76 8-12 Doubt. 36' S.Dc:ic. "'"':.'I CCNlltid -&,..,ng Gate , EA $2 ,160 00 $2 ,1$300 $2,200 00 S:2,2'0000 $2,350 00 si.z,ooo $2,400 00 n ,omm $2.440 00 ».«om $2 ,300 00 52.30000 $2,-'IOO 00 R,«Xla) 77 8-12 Oo1.lbtt-30' Black Vinyl Co a tea Swmg Gate 1 EA $1,800 00 1,~00 $2,000 00 n«,oa, $2,000 00 ,2.000m S2 000 00 >1.000.00 $2,040 00 ,,_"' $1 ,800 00 $1 80000 $2,000 00 ,-,.oa,a, 76 8-12 Ool.il!M 28' Black Vmy1 Coated Swing Gate 1 EA $1 ,680 00 s,-.. 52,000 00 >1.CICXIO> $1,850 00 s,,tma, $1 900 00 S,llOO.(O $1 ,900 00 $1,900a) $1 ,800 00 11.60000 $1 ,950 00 S1.a5DO) 79 8-12 Blxtc Vtft.'f l Coated Siioing Gate with 36' Op enm ~ 1 EA $9,050 00 sa.osooo $9,100 00 ,•:uooco $10,000 00 $1 0JJ)O,CJO $10,000 00 S1C,CDOOO s,o 300 00 1 ;0;XIO..DO $9,700 00 .19,ta,a, $6,950 00 >6.S,SOOO so e.14 Cefn«m CotlC Sidewalk 2500 SY $2500 sao,oa,a, $19 00 $47$()0a) $20 00 100,cooa, $2800 $70,<IOOCO s2, 50 15315000 $21 00 1,$2.>COU) 5'2 50 J JC6.:2SG.OO 61 S-1 4 C~l Cone Curb Ra mp Type Parallel A 3 EA Sl.300 00 13.9COa, $1 ,500 00 M.>CO m $1 ,0 75 00 s,=m $1,530 00 SA.90,0C s, 160 00 S3,4,80CO $1.100 00 Sl.X0.00 $993 00 '2.87fa) 62 .. ,. C.emWII Co ne Curb Ra mp Ty pe Combination , EA S1 ,SOO co 11500.00 $1,500 00 ,1.$00CX1 $1 ,200 co SJ 100CO $1,550 00 ti,S!OOO $1,160 00 S1 16000 $1 ,150 00 Sl.l~ $1 .130 00 $1,1-)0o:I 63 8-14 Cem.n1 Cone Cu rb Ramp Type Perpendicular A 9 EA $1 ,0 00 00 19.0DQCQ $1,000 00 J:>.«om $750 00 ... ,,., ... $1,150 00 J 10."""1.CXI $850 00 11.00000 $750 00 14,7'0.m $700 00 $5,3000:, 6< 8-14 fT'lioCMIIMO Edge Sidewalk 430 LF "'' 00 :U OlSOo:J $44 00 ,,a.moc $42 50 S.iS.2MOO $49 00 Ul..lmJ.Cl:I $50 00 t l t .50000 S47 00 $'2(1.2100) $63 00 m-oo Page 1 of 4 S. 352ND STREET EXTENSION PROJECT (SR 161 TO SR 99) RFB No. 15--015 BID OPENING DATE DECEMBER 1, 2015 Bld1 Bld2 BidJ Bld4 Bfd5 --BlCJ&--Bld '1 VIH'ldor Name·-·> ScarsellaBros. Inc Tucei & Sons Jnc ~E~,h:. AdJve Construction Jnc ,---.LLc Marshbank ConstrvciJon Jnc Pacific Civil and lnfrasuucture Locato, ---,> Seattle WA Tac;oma,,WA "'n~ WA Puu~•,,. WP. P.1 .. -· ... WA Lake.Sl:evens WA Fe4er~Wa WA ~em# Spec 1' hem Amount Unlt Pric;e Total Price Total Prlc:• Total Price Tolal Price T ... , Price Total Price Total as 8-14 Permeable Concrete !='aver 110 SF $25 00 S2 75000 $20 00 $2 20000 $81 00 $8,91000 $33 00 $3 63000 $9 00 $99000 $53 00 $5.83000 $20 00 $220000 96 8-15 Quarry Spalls 25 TN $40.00 $1 00000 $100 00 $2_50000 $60 OD s,.soo 00 $67 00 $1 67500 $47 OD $1 ,17500 $90 DO $200000 $24 00 S60000 8 7 8-20 ,uum1n aoon System Complete 1 LS S\01,570 00 $10157000 $120,000 00 $12000000 $127.000 00 $127.00000 $133.000 00 $133,00000 $1 15,00000 $115.00000 $128 000 00 $128.00000 $101 ,570 00 $101 ,57000 aa 8-20 Traffic Signal System -Pacthc Highway S & S 352nd Street 1 LS S235, 185 00 $235.1 8500 $207,000 00 $207000 00 5220,000 00 $22000000 $229,000 00 $229000 00 $265 800 00 $265600 00 $221 ,000 00 $221 .000 00 $235 185 00 $23518500 a, 9-20 Traffic Signal System Mod1flca11on • Enchanted Parkway S 1 LS $112,760.00 $1 12_76000 $82,000 00 $82 ,00000 $85,000 00 $85 ,00000 $91,500 DO $91,50000 $128,000 00 $128,00000 $87.000 00 $87,00000 $112,760 00 $11276000 90 8-21 Permanent Signing 1 LS $12,000 00 $12,00000 $3,500 00 S3 500 00 $5,900 00 $590000 $16 000 00 $16000 00 $16,350 00 $16.35000 $10,000 00 $10,00000 $6,500 00 $6 50000 91 S.:22 Plastic Stop Line Type A 170 LF $9 00 $1 53000 $6 00 $1 .02000 $6 65 $1 13050 $7 00 $1,19000 $1020 $1 73400 $6 so $1 ,10500 $6 00 $1 .02000 92 8-22 Paint Line 4" 9.34 0 LF $0 30 $290200 so 33 $3,09220 $0 35 $3 269 00 $0 37 $3,45580 $0 35 53.26900 so 50 54 .670 00 so 33 $3.08220 93 8-22 Paml L,ne a· 1,320 LF $0 30 $39600 $0 55 S72600 $060 179200 $062 $81840 so 35 "6200 SO SO $66000 so 55 $72600 94 B-22 Plastic Crosswalk Line Type A 1 ,260 SF $4 DO $504000 $3 SO $4 41000 $3 85 $4 ,851 00 $400 $5.040 00 $4 50 S567000 $4 00 $5.04000 $3 50 5441000 95 8-22 Painted 81cycte Lane Symbol 6 EA $110 00 '660 00 $50 00 130000 $50 00 S30000 $51 00 $30600 $124 00 !74400 $48 00 S288 00 $45 00 527000 96 8-22 Plastic Traffic Arrow Type A 25 EA $115 00 $287500 $80 00 $2,00000 $87 00 $2 .17500 $90 00 $2,25000 $130 00 $325000 $85 00 $21250Q sac oo $200000 97 8-22 Plastic Access Parkrig Space Symbol 1 EA $115 00 $11500 $500 00 ssoooo ssso 00 $55000 $560 00 $56000 $170 00 $17000 $550 00 $55000 $500 00 ssoooo 99 8-22 Rtl'T'IOYe Pawmv.a f,ll,fi;ing1o 1 LS $5.000 00 !500000 $5.000 00 SS.00000 $6.200 00 $6,20000 $1 00 $100 $3.000 00 53.00000 56,000 00 $6.000 00 $2.000 00 12.00000 99 8-23 Temporary Pa,,.ement Markrng 2,000 LF $0 75 $1 50000 $010 S200 00 $0 82 $1 ,64000 so as $1 ,70000 501 5 $300 00 $1 DO S2,CXXl OO $0 75 $1 .50000 100 8-23 Removing Temporary Pavement Marking 2 000 LF $012 S24000 $2 00 $4,00000 $1 20 $2,40000 $1 25 S2,500 00 $0 15 S30000 $1 00 $2 ,000 00 $110 $220000 101 8-31 Reso!ut1on of Utility Conflicts 1 EST $10,000 00 s,000000 $10,000 00 $1000000 !i10 000 00 s10,ooooo $10,000 00 $10 000 00 $10,000 00 $10,00000 $10,000 00 510,00000 $1000000 $1000000 1.02_ 8-31 Potholin ' 5Sl $5.000 00 $500000 $5 000 00 55.oo::i oo SS 000 00 $500000 $5.000 00 $5,00000 $5 000 00 5500000 SS.COO 00 $5.000 00 $5,000 00 $500000 !UBTDf"1. SCHEDULE A $U&l.)l1JIO $l,,1t1;5(0.70 n..111•.1"' o $31!)017,S...H IMl.$0 J.'J.ffl.&SUO ~,2ft.21J.71 S.CIJritdulot8 ·Ul,Qff1VfflWIWl'oll'lld S.W., \03 1-04 Unexpected Changes 1 EST 5000 $500000 $000 55 ,00000 .S.00000 $5,00000 ....... 00 $5000 00 5000 SS.00000 $5,DDO.<XI $5,00000 $5 ,0COOO 5500000 104 1-09 Mob1l1zat1on 1 LS .:1,,c..90000 $4..900 00 11,.5000i) $1 50000 1, ooaco $100000 ""'°" 525000 l!i,00000 $5 00000 t7,!,CIOOO 57.50000 1-1,.SOOOO 52.500 00 10 5 1-10 Flaggers and Spotters 49 HR "'350 $209040 soooo $268000 ~llO $2.208 00 '5500 $2 64 0 00 $5300 52.54400 l<ftOO $2,30400 15100 ·5244800 106 2-02 R emove Steel W ater Main 2 In D iam 490 LF ""' $69000 11$.CO $690000 S72S '333500 S1l00 SS,98000 11 500 $736000 ""00 19.66000 tt070 !4 92200 = ...... ___ ,C......_ a "" JMO sooo ''""' so oo sooo sooo ,0.00 sooo IOOO sooo '°"" so oo $000 ,0 00 109 2-02 Remo,,.e D ucti le Iron Water Main 8 In Diam 70 LF s.,oa:i 5700 00 ... "" $1 68000 "' so 51,50500 s·1;.o.:, $1 .19000 J10i50 $4 ,93500 133,00 $231000 S1G OO 51 .12000 109 2-02 Remove AC Water Main 8 In Diam 45 LF S!O,llO $2,25000 .1,70 00 $3 ,sooo 52.f lXI $1 ,080 00 >000 52.92500 .... .., $2 97000 S\11600 $4,72500 $ifiOO 572000 11 0 2-02 Remove Water Serv1ce Con nection 2 EA loHIOIXI $20000 -00 $1 00000 MSOQO $90000 l2'5000 $50000 SS6000 $110000 162500 $1 25000 :U,50000 53,00000 11 1 2-02 Remove Hydrant 1 EA ,,_o::ooo Sl 00000 S1,!00~ 51 .500 00 sasoao '85000 $,ooOO $500 00 H.200.00 $1 20000 Wl:$00 $925 00 IIIOO<X> saoooo 112 2-09 T rencn Safety System 1 LS ,.,.oo $50000 s,com $10000 S.1 )15,0:, $137500 •=oo $20000 \56500 >56500 UIIJOOO $2,70000 S1 00 S1 00 113 7-09 Crushed Surfacing Base Co urse for Trench Backfill 190 TN SIS(I) $304000 '3000 SS,70000 s:,,so $4,08500 .,,..., $4180 00 s ,900 53 ,61000 S:,,00 $5,13000 '""" $2.66000 114 7-09 Connect to Ex1st1ng Water Mam 4 EA 'li 1 GE&OO $666000 n.,ooo:ii 58 ,40000 ,uoom 58 .40000 S'J«GQ) $12,00000 1.2.500 -00 S10JX)000 >.t.000.00 $7.60000 s=oo $10.000 00 +1.$ 7-"9 ~ 0 LF \1UHXI woo $000 sooo 100> $000 so.co $000 SOCIO sooo IOCIO sooo IOOO $COO 116 7--09 Ducille Iron Pipe tor W ater Mam B In Diam 140 LF moo $9100 00 SBIOO $11,340 00 S \00.m 51400000 171:1:00 $9.800 00 1tt9.(IO s,e.66000 ..SCIO $1330000 U0.00 S8 <0000 117 7-14 Hydrant Assembly 1 EA ., ...... '386500 S7.00QOO $7,00000 ,a~ao $680000 $57!000 $5 75000 $5,!,0000 SS,50000 17.ICOCll s1 aoooo S8,oa:>CO $8,00000 11 9 8-31 Resolul1on ct Utrlity Conrt1cts 1 EST U.00000 $2,00000 D-000.!lO !2_000 00 S?-OOOCll 52 _000 00 n .. 00000 52.00000 $2_-0000:, $2,00000 ·-$200000 U.(00,00 S20CXJOO ~ 8-35 AdJust Water Valve to Grade 4 EA .J303.00 s, 200 00 $26000 Sl ~OCXl 00 msao $1 ,0000 S.X,000 $1,20000 '32000 $1 26000 S500QO $2 _00000 S56000 $2.200 00 ..... Adj i;t iiXIEIIR§ Se '3FP1aRl=IGIO IQ Qrade 0 EA 000 $000 S0.00 SOOD sooo $000 "'"" $000 $000 $000 SQ.a, $000 IOCIO $000 7-05 8«0l):Sl.luc~Mal'\l'l.olo 2 EA i3!10ll<<J S6 000 00 =oo $7 00000 S1.5aGCO $310000 """'"' $8.000 00 '5.60000 511 20000 .11 20DQD 5_2..40000 5"2.250.00 S4.500.lll ~!18TOTAL SOiEDUJ,E B . BID 11™3 Uf.tH..40 ""-ISO.OO -lSl,Tll,00 Sfl.11S.611 $60fl4.0Q ffUM.00 UU71.GD WSST95% $467356 56 .264 25 $539011 55 ;90093 $7 ,68779 $7,277 38 $553575 SUBfO'TALSCHl:DUU B • UI m~, n:21:za.11 SP;otl,tl 111;111.n ....... .,. n TOTAL $1..727.UUI D.J4,i:074.I! 11.!Nlffll t Sl..'1U.ttt .tt lll07.%1L21 s:un:r.coa: $> lO..U Bid Form YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Ac:::ttnowledgeAdderidaf1 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES BidSel'ledule YE S YES YES YE S YES YES YES BldSignatlXe YES YES YES YE S YES YES YES Bid Bond YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Subcontr11clorli:.1 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Combined Atf1da Y1i and Cer11ficat1C11 For m YES YES YES YES YES YES YES ~~SL.MN!"4 YES YES YE S YES YES YES YES The amount of Bid ltemt32 1i 521600 not as An error of quoted 10 bid form IIS $21660: A 562 12 was Lotal1ngerroror!i40 found 1n the along with the ~ Sales Tax en or fo r bid 11em# calculation for 32 resu l ed in total Schedule ·a ~ bidanor ol $10000 Page 2 ot4 I BicU Bid9 Bid1D Bld11 Engineers Eshmate Tapa ni Jnc WeSM-ater Consuudlon C~ny Ceecnll TianEarthwor1t..,LI..C Battle Ground WA •--WA. Ta:::oma WA __ WA .... Total Price Total Price Total ." .. Total 13CIJXICIO) bl.CIOOOO S30,000 00 JlO,O)QO) $30,000 00 UCMXIJOD $30.000 00 530,CCOo:J $30,000 00 "31)0)00) JlCCO)a:J ""-CCClllO $50 000 00 .150,0CCl,QQ $30 000 00 -0) $39,600 00 <J0.0000) 145,000 00 s.tS,ttlQ_oc, SIOttlOIXI t.111.CD>CO $8_000 00 S&OlCIOO :fi5 ,000 00 .15,CCICDO $1100000 s1,..ooc .oo $5,000 00 s.5.a:1300 $1 Q:OQO S1 00000 SS.ODO 00 SS ,00000 $3,700 00 $3,10000 $500 00 '5000) $1,000 00 $1.0:.,0,C() S6.ot0C(J ,S.(IO()(O SS 000 00 $5.00000 $5,000 00 .U.\XIOOO $5,000 00 5500000 $5.000 00 l,S.(IO()(ICI l ~<l'.1>00 '2!,0CCQO) $350,000 00 535000000 $300.000 00 S300.COOOO $427.01 1 54 s.127.011 54 $300,000 00 s:DlCOOllO ,~_QCIJ.00 $20,000 00 S25J >OO 00 $2500000 111.000 00 \ll.o:;QOO $22,000 00 $22,00000 S35.000 00 S30.COOGC SSCIOOOO !.SGCOOO SS 000 00 SSOCXIOO $5.000 00 s.s·oc:o.cx, $5 000 00 SSJlOOllO SS~OOO 00 l,S.(IO()(ICI ..,._0000:, MO.CCQllO $35 000 00 $35,00000 $95,000 00 ttS.COOO:, $10,500 00 S10;500.Q) $70,000 00 >70J)OCIOO '100 5'COO $1 00 ><OOO O) $46 00 =-oo $290 ,,·.:rmoc $58 00 W "-""'00 SI OO SIJD>CN:I S1 00 '$1.8COCO $48 00 ""6,@00 $72 00 1129,aClOO) $60 ()() s ;oa..oa,a, l 1Q.000a) SUl,DCIOQ) S35 000 00 us.oooco SAS 000 00 145.00000 S35,000 00 $35,00000 $10 000 00 '10,C<XIOO m .oo ><;.ICIOO $10 00 Sl ,SCO CO $26 00 ~ .. $10 50 11.575.C:O S25 00 S3,7'0Ql 13.00 ,,..1,ooa, S4 00 56 • .aoo m ., ()() $1 60000 .. 00 16,,0QOOO $5 00 ,a,oo:,a, S1 00 s,.:0000 $4 00 >28,ea:)O:, $2 00 $1440000 $6 00 i-0.?00CO $7 00 ''°·""'"' 135000 S1JJ!,QCO $500 DO =co $200 00 $600 00 $750 00 •=OJ $750 00 J?~O) i,,c,;llQQO:, S.0.0000: $65,00 0 00 SiOJ)OCIOO $18,000 00 $18,00000 $20.000 00 UQ.000.00 $25,000 00 ~.CCCI O: $1 0DCOCIO SIO.CXIOOCI $10,000 00 110,QXIOO $10.000 00 11(100000 $10,000 00 110.00000 $10.000 00 110.JD)Ol '850:0,00 $0SOOCl«l $100 ODO 00 S.tMCJIXlim $45,000 00 ""-""'"" $75,000 00 m.00000 $40,100 00 $40,100,0CI <2!>0 ...,..,Db S2 00 "'-""""" $3 00 S14-40 00 $0 00 U9.~00 $3 00 $1.«000 ..... oo ><.!<»O:, $400 00 $MOOOl $200 00 i.,,eooco $550 00 $4,iSODO $400 00 13.60000 ''"" '900.0:, $40 00 113,COCO $14 00 '4.G20CO $12 00 S3.9GOCICI $15 00 "Ji5000 IOJlOOOO ssooooo $5 000 00 SS.lXlO CO SS,000 00 ".000.00 $5 000 00 ss.ooom SS.ODO 00 $5.00000 $21 OC1 $157~00 $23 00 $112..500® $20 00 l l!Oo:JO«.I $21 50 S161 ,2SOOO $20 00 $1 50JXlO..OO s;i,a, mmoo $23 00 $25_530 00 $20 00 ~ ...... $23 00 $25.53000 S22 00 n,,c;coo IGCICI SD.00000 $6 00 $34 BOC 00 S35 00 \20J,.OOOOO $22 00 $127.600 00 $25 00 .s ,:e:000 00 ..Co:> uuc:ooo 545 00 $10.35000 $24 00 ss.~oo $45 00 $1035000 S28 00 ... +<000 ''°" $74101)) so 10 $74100 $0 20 11 ,c.a,.cri S1 50 $11.11500 $1 00 57_41000 ...000 >OS.2000) $600 51 Z1SOIXI $24 00 $51 12000 $27 00 151.51000 $20 00 S,IUOOCO S..00000 U . .00000 $1 0,000 00 s,~o:, S10,000 00 1,10.CD:1 .00 $20,000 00 m.00000 $10,000 00 U ~OOOCXI .sl>OO 5117 12000 $12 00 .... 9;DCO $32 00 s,11.nooo $27 50 $t00,UOCO $35 00 $128,IO)IXI $11 0«1 S1 3JUI.Q) $100 00 $1 1.0::0.to $130 00 S\"5.!aJ OO $200 00 S'2-fi ,OWOO $180 00 ~l fiCCHXI S7000 ~,a:ioco $7300 121!1.lOO.OO $91 00 $37310000 S75 00 =~oo $90 00 n;a.ocooo $10500 m=oo S200 00 s.5<.000,00 $97 00 $26.19000 $100 00 l?J,OCIOCIO $1 10 00 :S29 7tlOCO S!l(ICI '8,20000 510 00 l1$.SOOOQ S7 00 $1155000 $12 00 '19.«000 $6 00 Si.900(11) lJ1 S,000 $1 15..SX)(CI $1 00 ,$5180,QCI $24 00 S,138.90000 $28 00 $.IG?,12000 $40 00 $231,00Q(C moo ·uo ,bOOoo $1 00 SlfOOO $24 00 ... <l<OOO $33 00 $11 .a&OD) S25 00 Si.COOO:, t-' """' m .lOO.oo $30 00 $27.503.C:O $37 00 S,3.c,11 100) $54 00 =oo $20 DO ,11.wom 1'000 l!Jlt~CXl $200 00 S30IJ)(ICIOO $3500 S:O:US,00 $6800 $!0'2.MQ.00 $7500 $1 13,25000 S;15CO '6.l~O) $21000 1 10,50000 $5500 l'2.7SOOO $8200 "4 10003 $100 00 ss.a::ooo $120((:J s.10.e::ioa:i $400 00 S..llSOOCICO '.ii200 00 1,18.000.00 $89 00 Sll.01000 $200 00 1i 11,0'JCUIJ Sl .25000 S27.So)Oa) $2 000 00 ... .()0000 $1,000 DO m.000.00 $2,100 00 ..a;,oo.co $1,400 00 DCl,IOOCO s1 ~oc '""°"" $2 500 00 $1250000 $1.100 00 ,.,..., .. $2.500 00 ,,2.500co $3,500 00 s 1:i50000 ;s ooaoo '5.00000 $4 ,0 00 00 $400000 53.000 00 S3,!ICIQ.OO $5,200 00 $5)0000 $-1 .000 00 "-GCOOO >S.OCICICO sso:iom $6.000 00 S6.00000 S4,000 00 s.•..a:iooo SS.800 00 1580000 $6 500 00 16 !,CICIOO p.51).CQ U~a:1 $700 00 $1 "10000 $,400 00 SSOOID $440 00 S86000 $750 00 $1 ,500.0CI S2.00CIOO s.12.o::om $600 00 S:3 600 00 $600 00 ,uc:ooo $1,200 00 S7 20000 $1 000 00 1600000 1"7,00) $10.500 00 $160000 122.-= $600 00 Hl,@IXI $1,500 00 $.?1 _00000 $550 00 $7 10000 15.00000 s;oOClOCO $4 000 00 18,XOOD $3,400 00 $6,80000 $2,400 00 s.t.e:oc:o $1 ,400 00 12-eoooa =co SS OOO Q:) $12 000 00 m .acooo S3,700 00 U.7COCO $4,500 00 M ,S::Oto $1 ,500 00 S\.SC,000 S7JX)OOO i7000CO $1 0 00 0 00 110,Qt'O m $4,000 00 $4,CIOOilO $6 500 00 14,SlOCICI $2,200 00 S2.200"' u,CO'lm 1"5.DOO(O $~ 00,000 00 l l00.00003 S52,000 00 "200000 $68,500 00 Ke,5000:, $75 000 00 l?S,(D)IXI $100..C00,l'.m l t0).000((1 $150,000 00 11Sll.C(JO.m $74,000 00 11'4,CIOCIOO $95,000 00 W,.(lllOO:, $105.000 00 1,05.0:000 S160Cl000 $1 tJ.,OOOCO $40 000 00 ><00000) $1.11,000 00 114.ax'IOO $15,500 00 $1$.500(0 $15 000 00 1,-&.0COQO $5000 $1 0ZOOO S45 00 suaC1C1 $24 00 "-"!000 ... , 00 $9..mclCO $25 00 .s.1osa, $7000 W.00:, $150 00 $1.2'0000 $70 00 $56000 $109 00 '8720G 51 .500 00 $1 2.,0)000 '8)j)(ICl(ICI >l.0®00 $40,000 00 ..O.CCC,00 $20 ,000 00 $20 000 00 $110 000 00 $1\0.0CIOIXI $40,000 00 1-40.00003 S7000 ~1.room !33 00 SIQ;2)GOO $30 00 S9,30000 $38 50 111,9.\500 $40 00 $1 2.40000 U SO:, S.t ,MOOO $33 00 l,1 ,as&o:i $30 00 $960.00 $38 so 11..m.oo $40 00 11,tt,QO;l '51!0 S7~Ui000 $6 00 ~1,00000 $6 00 S7.COO $9 90 ,uoaroa:, $5 so '$7 .ISOCO S9CICI ».00000 $200 '300.00 ., ()() 'l1,2(X)QCI $5 so UJIOO CO $3 50 S1,4'1l 00 """ 1&00000 S200 s,.a:iolXI $2 ()() SlCOOCO $660 .......... S300 -0) J,17.JOO m,,.;;oo $425 00 i=a: $400 00 U t.J\XIOO S165 00 14,.7.CSCO $400 00 S21 .200 Cll moo $2.-IMCICI s,8 oo S::.D:IGCO $17 00 1i l.,5ilGIO:li $82 50 J.9~40C:O $10 00 s., 120.oc 1 100::0..oa )10,0COGG $10,0 00 00 SI O.Cl:OCO $10,000 00 $1 000000 $10,000 00 SIO,.COl);OO $10,000 00 »o.ooa co 1415 .. 00000 ~.OCOOO $50.000 00 s.50:00000 SS0,000 00 SOO,m:>00 $8 500 00 '8>0000 $40,000 00 $40,00000 1 1QOCIQOQ 1-tOOCIOCO S10,000 00 S.iOQCIDOl $10.000 00 .s.,0.00000 $10 ODO 00 $1 0.000 CXJ $10,000 00 »0 .000"' :.i•.OCI Ul8CO(ICI $10 00 $3200000 $20 00 '44-00 $11 00 »5.20000 $15 00 S,c.!,QCCJOO ""'"' SS,60000 $10 00 $4.80000 $12 00 S.S.'i'ISO OO $0 00 S3.8"o.W $6 00 $+00000 »>CO 111.*00 $200 00 $10600000 S50 00 ,,,...,.oo $42 DO $2226000 $65 00 ·Q<.<SCCICI ...... ST.1!$000 S33 00 S-3.53000 $14 00 U .54000 544 00 Soll 84000 $25 00 nnooo $2.()llO(ICI W.0:000. $500 00 $150000 $700 00 D10000 $380 00 Sl.14000 $350 00 SlJl:50 00 ... oo n550CO $45 00 $1.3:SoOO $60 00 Sl.;BOOOO S215 00 $645000 $22 00 '"""°' s:uc,aoo S:.8ll01l0 $2,000 00 ,:z.coooo $800 00 $8ll0 .00 $2 750 00 $2 75000 $2,100 00 D.,ICll OO moo -0:, $32 00 ~.56000 $50 00 -00 $38 so ,1,1 1-WOo:i $40 00 "4l,21XJOD Sl,!,liOOO $250000 $2 400 00 S.'2.@00 $3 000 00 13.000.00 $5.335 00 ,0-,>JSQ) $4 200 00 $,4.20000 S.,,50000 $350000 $2.000 00 .. _.., $3,000 00 13.000CO $4.620 00 s.e:aocn 54.000 00 "'-GCOCO ·u .oooac S2.IXICl.00 $180000 11,ecooo $3.0 00 00 >,;00000 $4,180 00 S<t t8).CO $3 500 00 S3.SCOCO ><.000.00 S<,CICOCO $10,000 00 StO,Dal.CO $6,000 00 H.00000 $9 460 00 ,~.4?100:, $6 000 00 H..OOJ CIJ s.soo $11 2.'SCOQO $22 00 .i$,OQIJJ:Q $30 00 J7S.rJOOOQ $28 00 J?O.IXICICO $35 00 $87.SIQOO lts:ICICO Sl:.a),C:0 $1 500 00 '$.4 ,!5000:, $1 ,600 DO $4 .. 80000 $1 350 00 S4 ,Q50 00 51 ,500 00 J,o&~DO ,:a,~gg iliGCOOO $2,000 00 n .00000 $1 ,600 00 Sl «ll.:,O $1 375 00 St 1175~ $1 .500 DO 11.!00CO S.2t'O)CO ueocr.,.co $150000 1 t).SOO.OO $1 ,600 00 $14.40000 $975 00 sa n5co $1 ,500 00 S1 J!itOCIO $9000 S38,1Cl)CX, $5000 t21-'00.o!I !20 00 $8 .. 60000 S52 00 S».""'<ll $45 DO S1 !11.3SOOO Page 3 of 4 I Bldl! Bid9 Bld10 Tapam. lnc Westwatet Coll struaJOn Company Cee«"' Batda Gniur'ld. WA Ret1 10n WA Tacoma_WA Price Total Price S.0500 $4,950CQ $40 00 $4,400 00 $20 00 '''"" $1.50000 $80 00 $2,00000 $50 00 $,1ZU'COaD $12500000 $169 000 00 $16900000 $190.000 00 $22000000 $220,000CX) $298 000 00 $298.00000 $263,000 00 sa&otO.OO $8800000 $152,000 00 $152.00000 $140 000 00 $20,WQICO $20 00000 Sl0,000 00 $10 00000 $15,000 00 1220) S3,740D:l $7 00 51 ,19000 $10 00 $2,0 $2335000 50 40 S3 73600 $0 50 $1000 Sl 320000 $060 579200 $060 12200 $27 720QQ s, 00 SS ,04000 $4 00 $!!1100 $3.30000 $60 00 $36000 $45 00 ,soooo $13 750 DO $85 00 $2,12500 $80 DO S$el01ll $550(Xl S6 00 00 $60000 S600 00 $$jlll00 '500000 $8,000 00 SB.00000 $3.500 00 ~22$ $4 50000 $0 20 $<0000 $1 00 "50 $30000() $0 20 5<0000 $1 00 ""-""'"° $100000Q $10 000 00 $10,00000 $10,000 00 S5Cl:IO.CO $500000 $5 000 00 SS.00000 $5.000 00 l,).J2.4.l'0'9,00 • S$,0001ll $5000~ $000 $500000 >$J)O)O:, -m.o:::o oo $20,00000 1500:,00 $5,00000 S,100003 StOO $4800 .... oo $1.920 00 ...... .. oo l27600() 11:ZCJO S552000 114 0) $000 $00:, 10 00 $000 ma, $1,400op ,.o:, $42000 ,,.ca 1\00.00 54 50000 >Mal $225000 ... .., IJOO.O) $60000 G!ll)O) S40000 ..... 00 ffi',1)00 $650 0:, $?.00000 $200000 '80000 S,>50000 $3 500 00 D00.00 $20000 S1,.e(N)ttl .. ODO !i7_60000 I~ 53.80000 S2 COCI c ,m::ico 512,000Cil 11 QOOCO $4 ,00000 iuoooo $0(1) I0.00 $000 $000 Sta:Jo:J $14,000 00 ...... 511 ,20000 $0000 $7!,00:00 $7 50000 srooooo U .00000 S<I.GCOCO S20<llll0 $200000 n.00000 52.00000 '2_000.00 U1 $7500 $30000 l«IOOO $240000 SOOOllO r-., $000 IOOO $000 IO al U-'OODO ss.ooo.rr n.oooa, 54 000 00 tt<OOOO 157110.00 $825151 $5.425451 $95109..S" In» UA1t..l1Ul AJ YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YE.s YES YES Total 52-200 00 $1,25000 $190,000 00 $26300000 $140_000 00 $15,00000 $170000 $4,67000 $79200 $5 04000 $27000 $200000 '600 00 SJ.50000 $200000 $200000 $10,00000 $500000 SlASl.)lLOD $5JJOOOO $5,00000 $2,206 00 $644000 $000 $98000 $2,70000 $800 00 saoooo Sl.«xlOO S4 56000 $7 200 00 $000 $11 ,20000 $4,60000 $2JX>OOO 51 20000 $000 $4 80000 $60.111.00 5576,436 ..... n.,, u,s; 3' ffid11 TunEarthwcwk. LLC "'--WA Price $44 00 $29 00 $145_000 00 $245,000 00 $127 000 00 $13 750 00 $8 60 $0 50 $075 $4 00 $75 00 $125 00 $660 00 $5 000 00 $0 40 $1 50 $10,000 00 SS 000 00 $000 >!000000 1.$2.90 '5>-00 JOOO $$100 .... oo S1 ,?$00) msoo n:ioooo 125.00 J.).EOCUl'I IOal SUiOQ n~oo 12 .000.00 1,l1'a, $0 00 !270000 Amount ol Bid II.Ml II 10G anv11or(PrOOUC1 cl$290vid4800 il 113.920) notS253$20 1s quotedinlh1Dld wh1chresulled1nlh1 l(:Qlblderror111th1 -~ $24000000 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Total $4.84000 $72500 S145JXIOOO $2-'1500000 $12700000 $13,75000 s, 12200 $4.67000 $99000 $5.040 00 $45000 53.12500 $660 00 SSJXJOOO $80000 $3,00000 $10.00000 SS 000 00 1.1.D.S l tt.J.4 $5.000 00 550 00000 $253920 $23,92000 $000 $3,99000 $3,96000 53,50000 msoo $3.20000 $4 75000 $14 40000 $000 $16,66000 $3,95000 52,000 00 s,,soooo ,ooo $5.40000 ,,u.uuo 513,82670 $1.Si,.)'10,90 ""' Engineers Estlmilte Price Total 510 DO $1 .10000 $100 00 $2,50000 $202.000 00 $20200000 $282,000 00 $28200000 $182,500 00 $18250000 $6,400 00 $640000 $8 00 51,36000 $1 00 $9 34000 $2 00 $2,.64000 $5 00 $630000 $95 00 $57000 $175 00 S4.375 0Q $250 00 $25000 S2 ,000 00 $200000 $1 00 $2000 00 $1 00 $2000 00 $10,000 00 $10.000 00 $5 000 00 $500000 UAUM0.00 500000 500000 S«64000 $4,64000 ssaoo $2784 00 $1000 $4 60000 $1500 $000 $1500 $1,05000 $2500 $112500 $25000 $50000 $300000 $300000 !50000 S50000 $2500 $4 75000 i2 50000 $1000000 ,11000 $000 $12000 516800 00 $3.000 00 $3,00000 $200000 $2,00000 $40000 ., 6000C $80000 ,ooc 52..w:I-OO $4 00000 'AO,.:u.t..oo $5733 16 -osu 1.1,U.11 Page 4 of 4 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 5, 2016 ITEM#: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: State Participating Agreement -Pacific Highway S HOV Lanes Phase V POLICY QUESTION: Should City Council authorize the Public Works Director to execute the State Participating Agreement between the City of Federal Way and WSDOT for the Pacific Highway S HOV Lanes Phase V (S 340 1h Street to S 3591h Street) Project to accept funding for the State portion of the overlay costs of Pacific Highway S? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015 CATEGORY: ~ Consent D Ordinance O Public Hearing D City Council Business O Resolution D Other STAFF REPORT BY: John Mulkey, P.E. Street Systems Manager ·-;,>v _ D_E_PT_:_P_ub_l_ic_"!_ork.:_ Attachments: 1. Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated December 7, 2015 2. State Participating Agreement Options Considered: I . Authorize the Public Works Director to execute the State Participating Agreement between the City of Federal Way and WSDOT for the Pacific Highway S HOV Lanes Phase V (S 340th Street to S 359th Street) Project. 2. Do not authorize the Public Works Director to execute the State Participating Agreement between the ity of Federal Way and WSDOT for the Pacific Highway S HOV Lanes Phase V (S 340th Street to S 359111 treet) Project and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the January 5, 2 6 Council Consent Agenda for approval. CHIEF OF STAFF: Committee Initial/Date ~u!II>~ DIRECTOR APPROVAL \--d..-~~Q"P-' IS- Initial/Date Council I nitia !/Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option 1 to the January 5, 2016 Council Consent Agenda for approval. Bob Celski, Chair Kelly Maloney, Member Lydia Assefa-Dawson,Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "/ move to authorize the Public Works Director to execute the State Participating Agreement between the City of Federal Way and WSDOT for the Pacific Highway S HOV Lanes Phase V (S 340'" Street to S 3591 " Street) Project. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: O APPROVED O DENIED O TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION O MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED-08/12/2010 53 COUNCIL BTLL# lsT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION# DATE: TO: VIA: FROM: December 7, 2015 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Land Use and Transportation Committee ~ Jim Farrell, Mayor . Marwan Salloum, P.E., Public Works Director John Mulkey, P.E., Street Systems Manager "'j'{!l/'-1. SUBJECT: State Participating Agreement -Pacific Highway S HOV Lanes Phase V BACKGROUND: The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is responsible for maintenance of pavement on all State Routes with in the City of Federal Way . Pacific Highway S within the Phase V project limit was last overlaid in year 2000 by WSDOT. The City has requested WSDOT to provide the estimated overlay funding that WSDOT would have to spend for the overlay of the limit of Pacific Highway S HOV Lanes Phase V project. The Attached State Participating Agreement provide that the City, on behalf of the State, agrees to perform the required pavement Work by incorporating the design, plans and specifications for the required work into the Pacific Highway S HOV Lanes Phase V project. The estimated State contribution in to this project is $1,220,424.00 payable to the City and includes the cost for the design and construction phases of the project. k:\lutc\2015\12-07-15 state participating agreement -pacific highway Mv lanes phase v .doc a ::,:: Washington State 'f /1 Department of Transportation State Participating Organization and Address Agreement City of Federal Way Marwan Salloum, Public Works Director Work by 33325 gth Ave S. Local Federal Way, WA. 98003 Agency Section I Location Actual Cost Pacific Highway S. (SR 99), S. 359lh St to S. 344lh St. Vic., HMA Overlay M.P . 7.46 to 8.45 Agreement Number Description of Work GCB 2168 STATE is contributing funds (PE= $111,238, CN = $1,109,186) for State Route No. Control Section No. Design and Construction to grind and overlay existing Lanes plus l' of 99 170101 the shoulders and the left tum lanes. Project excludes the Two-Way Region Left Tum Lane. Northwest Region This Agreement is made and entered into between the WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, hereinafter the "STATE," and the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, 33325 8th Ave S., Federal Way, WA. 98003, hereinafter the "CITY." WHEREAS, the CITY is planning the design and construction of a paving project on SR 99 within the CITY limits, and in connection therewith, the ST ATE has agreed to partner with the CITY pursuant to the above Description of Work, hereinafter "Work," and Exhibit A, Plans, and WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the best public interest for the ST A TE to include specific items of Work in the CITY's design and construction contract, and WHEREAS, the ST ATE is obligated for the cost of the Work described herein, NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to RCW 47.28.140 and RCW 47.24 .020, the above recitals that are incorporated herein as if fully set forth below, and in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants, and performances contained herein, and Exhibits A and B, which are attached and made a part hereof, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: PS&E, BID, Construction l. l The CITY, on behalf of the ST ATE, agrees to perform the above Work. Plans, specifications and cost estimates (PS&E) for the Work shall be prepared by the CiTY in accordance with the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction, and amendments thereto, (Standard Specifications) and adopted design standards, unless otherwise noted. The CITY will incorporate the plans and 'peci fic at ions for the Work into the CITY' s project only after ST A TE review and prior written approval , prior to advertising the project, and thereafter, advertise the resulting project for bid and, assuming bids are received ,and a contract is awarded, administer the contract. 1.2 The CITY shall provide the ST A TE with written notification of the bid price for the Work. The GCB 2168 Page 1 ST ATE shall have five ( 5) working days from the date of written notification to provide the CITY written approval of the bid price for the Work, or request the Work be deleted from the Project. The ST ATE may request an extension of time in writing, provided that the CITY receives the written request not later than five (5) working days after the STATE has received the written notification. The CITY shall provide a written response indicating the number of working days extended, if any. 1.3 The ST A TE may, if it desires, furnish an inspector for the Work. Any costs for such inspection will be borne solely by the ST ATE. All contact between said inspector and the CITY' s contractor shall be through the CITY's representative. 2.0 CONTRACT CHANGES 2.1 Changes to the Work shall be documented by change order in accordance with the Standard Specifications. The CITY shall process change orders for all changes affecting the Work in the manner set forth in subsection l-2.4C (3), Approval of Changes/Checklist, STATE Construction Manual, current edition. 2.2 Required changes involve changes in quantities for or alterations to the Work as are necessary to satisfactorily complete the Work. All other changes affecting the Work shall be considered elective changes . 2.3 The CITY shall submit proposed change orders for the Work to the STATE for review and written approval prior to issuance of a Work change order to the contractor. The ST ATE agrees to pay for the increases in cost, if any, for the ST ATE-approved required Work changes, in accordance with Section 4. 2.4 CITY shall advise the STATE of any proposed required changes affecting the Work as soon as possible and provide the ST ATE with an opportunity to review and approve the change in accordance with Section 2.3 before implementation. The CITY will determine the length of the review time based upon the need to expedite the change to avoid delay to the contractor. 2.5 STATE may request in writing changes to the Work through the CITY. The CITY agrees to implement the requested changes, provided that a change does not negatively impact the roadway, and complies with the Standard Specifications, Project permits, state and/or federal law, applicable rules and/or regulations, and/or ST ATE design policies, and does not unreasonably delay critically scheduled Project contract activities. All elective changes to the Work shall be approved in writing by the ST ATE before the CITY directs the contractor to implement the changes, even if an executed change order is not required by the Project contract. The STATE agrees to pay for the increases in cost, if any, for such elective changes in accordance with Section 4 . 2.6 The CITY will make available to the STATE all change order documentation related to the Work. 2.7 In the event it is determined that the STATE does not have sufficient funds to complete the Work, the CITY and the ST A TE shall negotiate to determine the future of the Work. If it is determined that the Work cannot proceed, the Work shall be brought to a level that is safe for public use and the CITY will terminate the remainder of the Work from the Project contract. In the event the Work is terminated, Section 3 shall apply for that portion of the Work completed up to the time of termination. The STATE agrees to pay all costs associated with termination, including contractor claims, in accordance with Section 4. 3 . ACCEPTANCE 3 . I Prior to Work acceptance, the ST A TE and ClTY will perform a joint final inspection . The ST ATE GCB 2168 6 Page 2 agrees, upon satisfactory completion of the Work and receipt of a Notice of Physical Completion of the Work, as determined by the CITY, to deliver a letter of acceptance to the CITY which shall include a release of the CITY from future claims or demands resulting from the performance of the Work and CITY administration thereof; except, such release shall not waive or release the CITY from any potential claims for defective work or materials. 3.2 If a letter of acceptance is not received by the CITY within ninety (90) calendar days following delivery of a Notice of Physical Completion of the Work to the ST A TE, the Work and CITY administration thereof shall be considered accepted by the STA TE, and the CITY shall be released from future claims and demands resulting from the performance of the Work and the CITY's administration thereof; except, such release shall not waive or release the CITY from any potential claims for defective work or materials. 3 .3 The ST ATE may withhold its acceptance of the Work by submitting written notification to the CITY within thirty (30) calendar days following delivery of a Notice of Physical Completion of the Work. This notification shall include the reason(s) for withholding acceptance. 4 PAYMENT 4.1 The STATE, in consideration of the faithful performance of the Work to be done by the CITY, agrees to reimburse the CITY for the actual direct and related indirect cost of the Work. 4.2 The ST ATE shall be obligated for the actual direct and related indirect costs not to exceed One Hundred and Eleven Thousand Two Hundred and Thirty Eight Dollars ($111,238.00) for design work and the actual direct and related indirect costs not to exceed One Million One Hundred Nine Thousand One Hundred Eighty Six Dollars ($1,109, 186.00) for construction as shown on Exhibit B. 4.3 The CITY shall provide to the STATE detailed invoices, including documentation for all costs and materials, for the actual direct and related indirect costs incurred for the Work performed by the CITY and/or its contractor. The STATE agrees to make payment to the CITY within thirty (30) calendar days after the invoice date. Invoices and payments shall be no more frequent than one ( l) per month. It is agreed that any such partial payment will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item and that, at the time of the final payment all required adjustments will be made and reflected in a final payment. 5.0 CLAIMS 5 .1 Claims for Additional Payment 5 . l. l In the event the CITY's contractor makes claims for additional payment associated with the Work, the CITY will immediately notify the ST ATE of such claims. The CITY shall require its contractor to make such claims in the manner and form as provided for in the Standard Specifications. 5.1.2 The ST ATE shaV not be obligated to pay such claims or their cost of defense to the extent that the claims are. caused by the negligent acts or omissions of the CITY in administering the Work. 5 . l .3 The ST ATE shall have the right to review and comment on any settlement for claims associated with the Work. However, the CITY shall have the ultimate right to settle such claims. In the event the ST ATE does not agree with the claim settlement as negotiated by the CITY, the ST A TE shall reserve the right to not financially participate in the negotiated claim settlement. If agreement cannot be reached between the STA TE and the C lTY on a claim settlement, the Parties agree to follow the dispute resolution procedure in Section 8. GCB 2168 '57 Page 3 5 .1.4 If the CITY agrees, the ST A TE may defend contractor claims associated with the Work at its own cost, and in doing so, the ST ATE agrees to pay any resulting settlement, court judgment or arbitration award. The CITY will cooperate with the STATE in the STATE's defense of the claims . The STATE agrees to reimburse any CITY costs, including attorney's fees, incurred in for providing such assistance in accordance with Section 4. 6. TERMINATION 6.1 Either Party may terminate this Agreement with or without cause upon thirty (30) calendar days' written notice. Any work performed by the CITY associated with the Work up to the date of termination shall be compensated in the manner provided for as follows: If it is determined that the Work cannot proceed, the Work shall be brought to a level that is safe for public use, and the CITY will terminate the remainder of the Work from the Project contract. In the event the Work is terminated, Section 3 shall apply for that portion of the Work completed up to the time of termination. The terminating Party will pay for the costs associated with the termination. 7.0 INDEMNIFICATION 7 .1 The CITY shall protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the ST A TE, its officers, officials, employees, and agents, while acting within the scope of their employment as such, from any and all costs, claims , judgments, and/or awards of damages (both to persons and/or property), arising out of, or in any way resulting from the Work to be performed pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. The CITY will not be required to indemnify, defend or save harmless the STA TE if the claim, suit, or action for injuries, death, or damages (both to persons and/or property) is caused by the sole negligence of the ST A TE. Where such claims, suits, or actions result from the concurrent negligence of both Parties, or involves those actions covered by RCW 4.24.115, the indemnity provisions provided herein shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of each Party's own negligence. 8.0 DISPUTES 8 .1 In the event that a dispute arises under this Agreement, it shall be resolved as follows : The ST ATE and the CITY shall each appoint a member to a disputes board, these two members shall select a third board member not affiliated with either Party. The three-member board shall conduct a dispute resolution hearing that shall be informal and unrecorded. An attempt at such dispute resolution in compliance with aforesaid process shall be a prerequisite to the filing of any litigation concerning the dispute. The Parties shall equally share in the cost of the third disputes board member; however, each Party shall be responsible for its own costs and fees. 9.0 VENUE 9 .1 In the event that either Party deems it necessary to institute Legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligation under this Agreement, the Parties agree that any such action or proceedings shall be brought in T hurston County Superior Court. Further, the Parties agree that each will be solely responsible for payment of it own attorney s fees, witness fees , and costs. 10.0 AUDITS/RECORDS 10.l All Project records for the Work in support of all costs incurred shall be maintained by the CITY for a period of six (6) years. The STATE shall have full access to and right to examine said records, during normal business hours and as often as it deems necessary . Should the ST A TE require copies of any GCB 2168 ·Page 4 By records, it agrees to pay the costs thereof. The Parties agree that the Work performed herein is subject to audit by either or both Parties and/or their designated representatives, and/or state of Washington and/or the federal government. 11.0 TERM OF AGREEMENT 11.1 Unless otherwise provided herein, the term of this Agreement shall commence as of the date this Agreement is fully executed and shall continue until the Work is accepted by the STATE pursuant to Section 3, or as otherwise provided herein, and all obligation for payment have been met. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the Party's date signed last below . CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF1RANSPORTATION Marwan Salloum Public Works Director STATE OF WASHINGTON John White, P .E. ARA SnoKing Date APPROVAL AS TO FORM Ann E. Salay, Senior Counsel GCB 2168 Page 5 °' 0 l ' l1 I , !· ,, ti le ~ SEC . 29, T. 21 N, R 4 E., W. M. ,.---·-· r -------- \....---1··· ,. . .,..,., .. wi.·-- ·wi~o.-;z; ........ -~ 1)1". ; .. ~ 'ri -;;;r-,,:s:,----· A,,~-.. -"""' 'a o-1'! ,,\I,"") --1-·--""~,,. -:~--r ~~~ 1 ·"'IQ"r~- H r.J'I, .s.JLfilL.$.'l'A_~ BEGIN PROJE CT MP 7 46 :c:.: ~ ~?M.o (,i --·· ::§:f.''• ~ \ :...i< llNf 1~.~ll •2.l: ,T, ""'~ ...... --·-. -.._ ~\ "i \ \ ', ., .. ' ' - SIL!i...).l ... ~illl !!•Cl!I ft'(';,,.... I ~.~ .. r.f.,..,\t"" :""" :•1 2-1~/ I / , i I -, "'.jJ,a.,,,.,_L r,_t'i1"r't ~f''ii\tl ;.c(11liT1,..,t 1-n 1~,;.o.o"(.\N .,,u ··~•,, ,f'.:~,·::.:-:i.-v ':!r.'f;,.--: :, ~1h11r-~~.l\:"'nr .... ~ §(:."TO !,lf u,4 its,( ~e;. :.u .,,, ~,.;::;; \o:L'[ L"'I( (l' ,l l_l) 1 OCC,.,: l'OIY!!> ,0 11'1! 11\\,1 1 : --,' . ·1--., .. _J _ • , I -j ~-i " . .. ....: ~-----• ----;j 6e..$1~_QI fil:Af~ :II?, t; Ol"">-.' ..-. :~v,JJ,t,,o<'(r.f•r. ~ftl;f U,O, ~; ';,.')oJI~ 1$(,}1< SIRf(1 Gl!:"".:,.•nt•' IUWfH",ffl a(AI o!,I ••U~J!' S0\1111 ut!> \ti: i, -. ~>II !It t. A .:.I ilt •!Sll, '"'-.)IJ,I Y> l · \ .'.:' 1,;;; .-.. .rt ~-~'l~ .o.1.1 ~ otT<~,.. ri ....... ~~ ,;: !~ ,a, , c.-.,N-1 Q~:SJ.~~ _ !'.!:i:ill-N.G...S :·. u.:·., .. ,.c;·,11 .,,...·,1,.;.,,,·,.._.,.01n ,...:..:,~ ',.)110, i.o,~R. ?M':''.S£! ~(' (;!< .... ~-:-• ··~ r,,L>~ ~· •, IX\l, ... q ,,a;':l'V"'" ...... J: ;! . ~)' 1.u>~-~ ~•,U>' .-Lo--::,1 EM. "'L -. ! j ,. . -"'-·-·-'-'>---"-. ·l --+-::; \ jo ' -1 7 -\ 0 ... "" , :,;" / \ Ii r-1 :'.f.i ~~-°:~-:·g-r~.:·)·~ .• , •1,..,1..-c:a 1'COf'l •H 'o1CJ,t .( ,,) •"i,to,.A.a t L -__ __: ..... ..s.cn.2,.!.2 560,92" .L '\ !.11 Cl.. w ~ ·i:t~."fl# .-~~ \ i€, ... -l .,,t; ----·,,, ;I . ;f-! ---~· ------PAc1iic Hwvs (sR 99) :1 J "'•<.,:, 1,.l P., .... ,o r·i· ,~.,.-,,,."\,.,.---T .. ,,.,·".,,,---1-... ,.,,,_,,. 4 ' ~.~ ... fr ,~!:t1.~.:'j1:1~_, .. '~t ••(;_1~.11~;t~'t1~~,ml4:!( r • •• :·~ ~1 •,. 1" u,, .. 1 '''r,I • ~· ,,,, ,,," I .,.., ~-!'1>-/~· I _=:j -c...__,...__ ..... ~-~-~~ .,!\, • }~ .i9 :i11.' 1·1t.Lt1{.• ,\.• lYPICAL 1WADWAY SECTION ... ,. ...... 1..!£\.2l~o_:_~:.Ul-' ~: i ,t) ·."' ti), ,\ ,.,._1 n c, ., -~·r-+. "'-'""--... -~ \ ';! -,tL I!"'~ ' 'J!_ ~v, ~1 f ,-.., ' • ~ \ _.I~ 1 .1--/: .---~ .1~ .... :, • .. • t --·,,ti ... . I ' ~ I \ \ ; ----..... \ r : .-• .,. t \ \ \ I i ·. \ \ • \ \ ~--":J,1~~ l I \ \ \~Ri ~~'-;c.;.:' .!i.i-!" . I I > ' lir" ..,.,_,,,,,, •U . M~~»...c.' ' .n1~ Ci.' .IW ~ \ H r.~i'". ·~:lt ,Jf> ~.,.- lttli:~·u.tt.·1.~ ,anlll<;l';\,d '~ W1ICN •1ffk>- 4oi;r ';,c'" .... r,J..~ •~, NO"'>W..<\lltl•*r-':ic-.. ,u"'"" WSDOT NOFITHWES i REGION APPROVAL CIIANNEUZA TION PLAN ~~: ..,.;;-; __ ~--~ ~ .. ~ M • B,rt,o,:,, f'r'G)' t~,:i..:;; ... ,..~·; :...-dtG t?--""':· -1.1~t1~. ... w ~··~""- -----------,-~ -: c-:=1 HR !:";'~.. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MP7.46TOMP7.73 ' ' --I ,--~I --------I'.":::~, I Sft99 Ill' 740-7.13 ~ SR99--S356th ST. --;:=:~ ::-:-r--:-...,._.-.. F ----S356lh ST. CHANNELIZAnotlPLAN FORAPPRO\IAL ------,-,:: __ -___ ! = """-"""''"·"'"•-! -, INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ~---~ =· -·=-;;;;.,,-;;,;,,. :=· . ....-----ir.,:--,~-;;_. ~~~ 9!£.,~':~,~ r,,---;;-·· --!-r.::-------.,..,_ ----! CHPA·1 1 / \ j I ' t.il,so ... ~o-b> 1,:. t,(i ,. CITYOFF"EDERALWAYIKINGCOU~-~EB~AAY.NOlt ::;..,, AJ. -.IQ'ot!li ~,-1"1-.U il\..1, 1 /] DRA'hiR I <ff seourncr ~ '- GCB 2168 Pacific Highway S (SR99) S 359th St Vic to S 344th St Vic HMA Overlay l=Yhihit "A" D".:lnt:'l 1 ""of 7 O'I ..... ll ,, a . IJ ' SEC. 29, T. 21 N, R 4 E., W. M. i~ai'r ~,:.:..-iifa&';~._~ - t~t~~i.·,~·~t; . I \ at o.....s.,_ ........ - ., ... ,,u, Bl\$1;, J r !Jf ARl ti_l,, .. tll' :u ~-~· ~·.D«. !K· "' :.,u-<£::iru cE •llf:.Rllll( c• JI•· ~r;.,..s•ir.-r H~rt'.11 ~,,: ... .1,11£,1 1,.:."1.t •I•'>• t:;:r ..:-,r:,.~•lii•~:\l\'f:>-'>:i ~·,.·111r 16;,..,~ ,,r •'.l··~s,,· •srwi:l:'.F.:lO'J I ~ &""ti11.,~~n·~Ol't1 I\ -~1;..,o,a..,.., \ I l--P-'k'~':.:.~ !'Ml-II~~,,...,...._:! \ iii,~;,1';1oi..''c~,U.---\\ r.irGD,~rt>~~~~ --W:.f:J;"'w·~~· ,;_, \ •NOrl:. 'J: °i~-_,<;..._r: .._~...,, l:'I et: >l)L ,:o,.,i;, •&l'tl .. I' l)C.Vf1! l'EI.I.C'l'tr ,EMT!.ll 1a: ,.;,;: I ~~" Coc;;:\..ll !l lAP(.111 'IEQtl i IP OQUil.1: l'fllt:J IAP(FI 1.1 (i ••IO ,)0,1$,J r.:uOW Cltlli"" UII( l)O ~1) \ I rlo!M ll'OlllO tt1tM~()H L~•E TJ.E'(R (70 "Ill ~,t•,.:."; ,:1¥,,~\H,'.llr, • ..., ·•• ' •• ·~ --·. -~ • r ;--r-· -· j ,,.-,: ... t .. 151:!Jl; / for,. ;::•: l>A\'fl.l(HI \ • \ l ' -,_ . . .. I -· -... /· --. \ ---: L .. . --~ ''-!----\---L .. ----~· '"""" I --- \ ~~~llo '5•1!11 -·---" -r-. "' "T .--rn.o .. ,,_\ • ••~·' -~-41&,.w,lerr,iiC -. --=== '''"° -r ~ ---·-~ .. ,~ "'-, I -\ «· .. , -=----.a':;,.'-· ·--*··-·· -'"·' ~ .. j '-'.!~ .:-4.1 -·-i •t.,(,0----~-...... --~i 11>'.f ------,>,c.1 !!Ip ... ---- 0,0100 ~--• :~t "''l! ~=t -..... ., .. o w ~-----~~ ---I ; i .... ······--j UICI: or r .. iE~CtF I PACIFIC HWY S (SR 99) -·1 _ ~!!-81--Rtl'f;,w ~~~~·-~~~i ~--r- f .. i ii;;, n .. :,l':99Sl/\ii1H .. (.i 1-• r~o Yl:l.am !li.1•1k..~~" - >.!Cl;t,ll,'.'5tt: C,.•'il l~~ (\~:'I ,I,' et· ..... V.lff: Lt>.~ {2~ ~IJ ·~;r ?\. Ufl J•.JftN ,'ltolr (JC P1 • ·,.:,r ::-. LHI l\lFIH ~"•H.::'.1 le.~ 1 r: E ie oo, ,rn ~-re, .. ~..,,.. ~"""'" 1, • :=n 91:Qtl wn .... ~ (&:,. ~r , ~ 0011(.D ~ l ;J'll" ~"'" (JI.: ltl ) 0 0 J, ,n~ ~ ;-;:.: "'" ~ ~n ~ r ffi~ ~ !; ~<n ~~ -~ o\ ... \ \ \ QlliCtf...k6f!,:A.~~;..S & r~\,:~~ '\1:.vt.~~~,.~gr.}:j_.,1" !il1r£l c~.~A-2 •.>.t'.• Otf'I. ,l ~~ :;{'1~~1~~J~:~~ ~~; .. ~-: ~~01 f!,(/ •Ef:~ O<F~· 1 r~~t~·.ru \ WSDOT NORTHWEST REGION APPROVAL CHANNELIZATION Pi.AN --;-= r==F-r-~ -r r r:.:;(=F-1 --r -·.- _,.._ -1 ------ ,;:;-.; :-r.:-re::::-· -::--~:r-- ~7~-:_·•,,: ...... a~ UCL/':J:>~fl /} . - ~'.:'~~-:_~ rp'!/.~ ---·---~ -iBR•• MP•4H73 ' SR99,S356thST. I HR [,'."';'.;~~. ---.. , CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ! MP 7.46 TO MP 7.73 ,.,.._ ...... ~ r= · --------s 356th sT. 1 cHANNEuzAr10N PLAN FOR APPROVAL F . · --· ···--· INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ,=·-. --...... =·"" ----l ffl t&-~lb1.'Sllh8 ·~ . ((i:lll.'',W', ?D~~ I OOl!<JOL.ib-~.. • 5:"'=-= ~:,;:::~. Ill ···----··-lcrrv OF FEDERAL WAVIKtHO COUNTY FEBRUARY. 2oos1~· ~~~l·-;·~-;;:I\J-:----r'r.,;;. . .,6~,,~;:;: UL1 ---; CHPA~2 --. t't.-,,, DRAWER S!:OUEt..>r.~ GCB 2168 Pacific Highway S (SR99} S 359th St. Vic. to S 344th St. Vic HMA Overlay 2> /7 C'I N ·i , ~! }~ ,,. t SEC. 29, T. 21 N, R 4 E ., W. M. 0 a + " ~~ <' -< v," oiO rn,-l:(i CJ:::l,1 ,_n~ \ ' \.c/ ~'<t"-1':,. •l/ / -·-,..: ~~~ri-&~~-~ .'G, .. ·-:..- /~9~1c,r,r·1r '/~!Ill'... ) , .... ·'" I I I '~I\ ~~~ti~-m BE AlfA COJJPlUt-11 :'1I.f'lO:i~~'1rrr11T '"•.-C ;... •f<t ~.-~ ,-·.t. U"Ct•"U ),, - ., ~.~~/ ..... -==---"_\' ,.\:, ,w,. \ :,.-i,V:-W"...&\,\F!J~· ~l!l.~:l§l;~;;::~~==~t~~==~===:::::~~ = ~~~i'-~;-~.' \ .... -3-11~ ·---~ -'-. . ~· . ....... ,-.· ··-/""'~'" . ---. :..j ··-.. ·.-··.s":'.•• . • . ,. ,-,,_-.. .. .: ·-, ·-. :;;:: I ~1. l;lA$1~.0f 3EAr<li·tsa ,; r:.•.r 17" Ci.•"~, AL..)/.ll; 11-11. &f-:H,V,.f.\lri:lJ ::rn1F11.•r,lf t:\ 3Cvr,. _.t,5r,., ;;.r.ieEL• .tf.ll'IU:H II-IE ,.:,..w•iDli IN c;. [ ~r IS' '-•!:lilE ,OtJll-!oNf,'l<LllONL.•\11:'.li""" 'SE ..-, 'HL -1>' uis>:: , ~fl-' :o r_:.$1 1 r ut~,<: ~:.._,,.., ~l, SIDl.w.i.t;.. ft"~a;>·· :o ~ ._~A :::u-,..,,•_1.o.>11 Ll[.~pJ_~NCF~- !:__. i~"':~~/~u:i~~~~~JOO~~ a, 'iHt.1:1 I>* ;, U«) (>IP-A i) , , Of'1.li 11°"1 i7.: "CC[3~, --,..,Cl!,, ,·.i,1, l~, =f!l[; CLl~~Clrr~ t;~~f2H) ~/~~~~-~~~ ,..f !!££1~ CII'._ • >---:".;----==--~_J· \ -I ____ _,,_,,.,,,, ' ~ .. ~;:'= "'" .,,__,,," I 8 . . --••" . . ' ·-~ I = \.:,-w,~~ ·i, ... ~-"-.-. ..,....... 1 2 v • •· ~·;,l~ • r I " •. --~---•• " 1 ... L_'::?.c.a,_,..,.P,,.,., = ·~~\I:,'•/\_...,. ~ . _, .. i .---___ W: .i 1v1~ I l ·I ... -. -, =· --~~ ,, r..5:i!.! / = ~~!!:;! ~~·~11 ;· \ •' -,. 'h.-" ·--... • I I ""-• --'"" ""°, · , : ~• -, ••••_.. .,,,.-';., _ ,s . '" "' · I r--::;;r :• ~· --• · " -·--e.,e ,,,'!J'!d'. ,, .... -I , > ~-\: "2..1<~ , f , ......... I I \. r •· f I \,:t.'r·""''' = ·.\ ~ "'°'"'''"""'·' f.,nc.,n-'PL + z 1'!",,l:: r.:;,v;• '~'r.crs~ 1 (00 ,tit'" j'; /' • ~ "" ' · ---• -I' ' -.,.,,, .. -• •• ~~· I OS '·'I l . ' ' -• I ~ -" -·---,-•" """-'-"-'""'/ , ~ '-• . • ~ ,, -I.=-,"', , ;:1· --"~,.X,2~ ·-,oc , "~ . I ~ W.&"()-~~ ...... ~ .• . I -\ --· --:::-,..... ~ '""· -..•, \ '. J .,. . ·~ ~ -: f \ ~ ........ . ' • ~, .· .::.-···'" < •· ' ,.. • > . . [:-E!:':;~}':f''',-1 ;:,.c«.c,,.,;;-··~ ~--........... t ~\,,,,,,;; ,, , 0-' . .,, ..... ~ .. •· /: ' ,;:::,.r:i:r, ,1· • t.T.:.:·:··.":'·,~=-"'.,..... ~,,,,,,,,,,'>ii,,, . VJ-. c·' -~-· -.. . \ ~:·::,c:: :" / ;;':'!:~~.:'-. ,:.;~~ . . ,J .;( : "'" • ., !',;~.:'.:' ~., ., .. \ I . t:::11.~'""' .. •• .,..,,, """""·'' -"'""' "'· ,r__....-/ ~ \ · -"'-"'-'~r '' -~-" 1.a.1iri z :J~ :rl!: ic' :z __ ..... ,, .. :.~'.i,,\\i\·.;~";:;, _,..,~ ____ _;:.J _,\\'-=·~·~-\ ,i_ .• ~ Ef~:Jf~~1\?? 0 "'" ... , .... ''.:-·~------\ ..----:: \ \ '" ,,,_ "'"' ::;" ~".~<;:,::;' ' " "' m,. ~ _.--:.:----~·· \~ ':1 "'"' ~ '" ~11'..-r,,;,,...----I \ •,•, ~ ~· ,,. ' ' ___ .-·.Y ',., ,'I\ ..,.,,./WM';'""-•11... .------.._t' \< ' .---t ,,... .. ~,-..... " ..... ,-r--"'.\ \~·~ .. ·""of •'~ SR 911 \1~lt'l~~£li ~l~~c~; ~~ii~ C.1JAfl WSDOT NORTHWEST REGION APPROVAL CHANNELIZATION PLAN M r"' ("'1JN1.1:-~;i,.-..,. -~ - ... ¥. ~. -· --~~ w""~\l,ffi' -..... ,._.,~··";~ <><-f -•""·T~ Jo.t.. . ~~"'---- ,--r· . :-~--Fl-~fl_.-· , ~~o·~-·\.~{.,_ -: ' ·re I /~ lffi t?"' ::._ -·1=-ia;' ,.. . I ··~:lier=.>" --... ;::..:~·· ... ,_...,JJ ' -SR99 -S356th ST CITY OF FEDERAL WAY [ MP 7.46 TO MP 7 .73 $ 356th ST. ! CHANNELIZATION PLAN FOR APPROVAL -... -~~c:.;::,.wu...,..ita ... F:;:.,-1..-r:t!1~.a. I·,-· I~ "°='-\' .. I '.?- DRAWER "' SEOUENr;-~, !NTERSECTION '"'PROVEMENTS r.;. -·----~ F"7 --I"""'. --w ~ i .• _H.llh'I.J.u?, ;/~·=·----,,.;·=-·-~I~ CHPA....J 3/1 CITY OF ~nOE~ 'll'IA'l',KfH.O COU riH' IF'ESltUAJtr, lOOIF ~~-"LC ,. • ~,v,i • ;,~·~ ... -· -' 7 I ----~ GCB 2168 Pacific Highway S (SR99) S 359th St Vic to S 344th St Vic HMA Overlay C: .,h t.-. ,,;. n I\ H .-. 0\ w ! ,1 i: i'i i; ' SEC. 29, T. 21 N, R 4 E., W. M. :-!!' ·.!{lfo~t.P-~~iol:#-, ·,-~9~11~?r: .. ~~E1t t~u.'i'i !lfi;'"Ti"i A\;,'IC-,£ • 'liot1f0'1'utlE<APF.Ri.14 ;\lt2!S .. T) tlll.J cui;a • rurrui \ ~~ :i9 SU CJ,:, ~ i.Mt ... "l!!<.~-....ricpr,p}f~-i ·, \ ~~.:o~~~-1 ~1~! -,J_ . -:~ .. -.. -r; \IR.'t:-~~l'I.!~ " ? ., w., < ~ .... ""- f !W •INE -· -~ --1.L.9" I ··~. . 4,,..; -, I I ..... ... , . I I ~ . / / ~ g:c.• ~b L~ "' :r" I . •_m_._,,, I I-I Cii.,,..si......,,,..,,.." -., --- ( ~W.:-...W.-W.--' I ,.,.,... .] ,.:~, , ' -;:i:__-~--: -==4-1--1~'=-···· _1 • • l ! ' ,_..., ~··1... 1'1l.lr.> ~ -< ~ --~ ~l,.ffl.....i::rr'G IITI.. \ ---, .• Jl'-0!..L C\~AO (!, Ci.MT[~ IJ.I, ,oC r !~.,_~!~~~;~~ 10\<>(ii~TI'L"i", i;,~r. ~F "tu.O\:' ,, ~r,• In·~,. ... , ~ O-:llh..">: ;ft_~.:ixr I -. .. .. ~-;1Wirii.O''qr) tt!G1.W~f1.;t ,,1a.s'Rl) ~n.~~<::·t••n -----==-=~·=---:-; l --r--.--I ·--.--·r ,-··,-,--1 . ·c-· r~ r~-=-,~-r.-·- -, l ' ., 7JJ <. o~ 1-s, 'S£e "'£"' ... !J}l-r~ ------------~ }:· PACIFIC HWY S (SR 99) ·1 ,1 ..... .~ ... I ol -,- "i ._) -+-" J ~\ :~-i ~I/ ~--''--:-r -··LL• It ' 8ASIS OF bt.c'\!:lli!.(; a !Mfttr, .,....._a,,J,\l-,11£.,II C ~· ... ~~~~':~~·[[::·' .. ;~.;,":.Ni~~.~~';.~,,..... ''-"" '-' (...S I •"' AU. $V_-w~..-"~"pr. I>.\ t,I 41)• I •J<J~1.'•._ J .. blGr~ !\J<JP..N....li..;i ·., ~~ .. ·....::)~-;-: ~·· 4 :»-iir•~·l"--C~ .. " r~~t·~tlt:.~" :'::'';~.,c.:;1~ AF'f'll" UY ClfY ... rrc:.R ......... ,,~ •u:•1:tABFI. JOOJlstC r;,..,,:[T:! 0,Fh.:, 4W\, 'l-1~A-~ I 4'i ta, ~-... ~.ti1 ,,ts\, 0(~,/1 :,I II"' -.:1.:.~,J;' -.-r-~~~~ WSDOT NORTHWEST REGION APPROVAL CHANNELIZATION PLAN ..,,...~~».t.o-•""'-~:11C i-......,~ ·-,.,,. ...... -. - c.lo:ittu~•·~' ---.,,,.,....... . - .,...i' ~~ l~!'.!"'9! :zA.'¢'B c··..:~--·· -----1-sR" -- it;,:... I CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MP 7.46 TO MP 7.73 -----MP 7.Ml-7.73 :-----SR99 -5356111 ST. HR MDREr~.1.1'" F'"' ---·--·; S 356th ST. CHANNELIZATION PLAN FOR APPROVAL 1:1,10,~-~~-\":.,,1..~'1.G_L._ r==------- ~T~-oll4J ,,.. ..... 2~0·111-,i::--1 '-£'.. l> DAAWER I ft SfOU(Nf'F l)i, ; INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ,-•.. ---· -r"· .-·----·-·· ----~--er-, ...• lcrrv OF~DERAL WAYIKJNG COUNTY FEBRUARY, 2008~~~:~=.. 11~:~:;;::D\,.(~--CHPA-4 : ~~ GCB 2168 Pacific Highway S (SR99) S . 359th St Vic to S 344th St Vic HMA Overlay r .. 1,.-.:r. :.t 1,,..,. ~I j ~ c ~ ~ r, -, , ~ V 'Y9 Sl.i ~O~ f 8/ ,'\If P 7 (.,,"'! -"!--..... . C-E ~ \.•t11 1.:t1 E {ftnn;~'tlf ili' / ;~i;"t,o 1 ··••· .. , .. ,3· /1 llol,nlW.1.L 1V'fHl &JI( --, "f'l• UO ,\n o,l •\O•/ l!!/.eef'T@ I . -J , ~ ~ ,,. ill: --:, ... ,.. ------1.---i;.,o/ --_-,-1.~ -7 ---6 '5---:--'-.:=FF ~ -.. -•, 11 I r , _ ~ ~~; '= • -=:3-I ,- "' ';'---:-" £ L :=-(fN~• -~~'7 ~l"'f ~Fi t-. f.'S,I :· i fiAff I ( 41,;w w Su 1(10 SCAL f I N J"[ET j't 1 ,pc 2~ "'L ~s r i ~ -R Q.H 1 c '*,ll(l\, --~~ll. --ft(ViSIOiN-1_!\o ~ __,J\ i""' r-io 1:s: C'QP i )R A J ll<AG[ MAR KING . St:.~ P"v]r;~. 'J!:. TA :L.s 5 Hff: r'-:, ~l):) • =c.c. -~'I Washi'ngton Stote- Departme s SR 99 P IERCE CO. LINE TO S. 340TH ST . & S. ]IOTH ST. TO S. 272NO ST. GCB 2168 Pacific Highway S (SR99) 3 5 9th St. Vtc to S 344th St Vic HMA Overlay Fxhihit "ti." o -"···· c ·' - z '-' "' ' w i w > < Q. .. "' ; m ~ 0 0 ~ " a, C 0 . ~ ~ / 0 v ~ ~ 0\ ~ lJ1 ~ .: :,: 0. ~ 0 " ; mi-~1t1 f?·-~mi ...,· L,. I h~ \ I ·P.t-2tf" ~-¥,~·~,., .... ~ ,'ft"lt'lf0,1:1t'-;,C1f1'k, ....... ,~,~t1-7 \"·' "' I m. t;~~ \ \~::.;fYr ,i.w I :n ~S ~ ,. ',o . .s·)~\~ \ ~ m1t'Y~? ... I 1.,ctt t lJntt t u,r il'(III sro ~l u. .... 10• \ I ::: ' -•1• :~ . _ ---630 ---• ,, -:!:. h -------~ ::: -----1?· Z • $7 -l , --b?O -----------, ' :;--• -. :~ ·~ ----------- •• ": .,. ----.---. .\ I ~---I .. I ~E'~-=i --------- ~~~-~ T':'P( t'R 1'1 •S! )C rR A.fl'"\:_ 4RRO\; sr C/ r·,,:,r tl "'I A.::,1 I C '"d ~ ( 4RA'J'J u •. fl~i~ \ L~~-~-h~·~ g~< S '':( 1 IN,Jij("UifC l•O ••D '°"' · c(i,,$' ,qu •&.!:!-, ... • •• ,s-on.._ I ,, . "i' b!t¥ .. ~ .. L(F'' ~URN L!cNE e!Ci tf LfFT T\jRH U,N~ 1:'l(FI ~OU. f"l,lN I-'-!A' EXCdnd) NOTES, IS:> 4U•10 --.i:m;r.;;-rr('ult'. .. lttl iJ\P[lo ~ i ll'IC-T,1.P[A ':'f,5' RTI so 100 SCA\.( l'II rE E l FOR OR,,l;~AGE. Mti.RRING SEF' PH1JMC DfTAllS sn£ETc:; P0:' ~ i:>cti SR99 ~ I ::+; i 9 W-fl Wcshinglon Stole I -~__,.-~,..-.... , ..... m ••i• ; ~.,.,... 0,-~ ~ ~,, i I .,, Oepcrim~ntcfTrcnsporiolion PIERCE CO. LINE TO S. J40TH ST. & S. JiOTH ST. TO S. 272ND ST. GCB 2168 Pacific Highway S (SR99) S 359th St Vic to S . 344th St Vic. HMA Overlay i::.,(1-,ihit "11" o~nc h r,f 7 ! P C8 ~ -J z c, 0 ~ ~ z 1 w .. w ~ < . 0 ~ 0, c c 0 ' / "' 0 x '.i: ~ ,• O\.;; 0'\1- 0 0. > ~ ~ 0 c ~ :,: ~ 0 ~ :iiii2!: • h /1;,."'i'.;,_' 'n<' , .. ~.. 1f!;ihr'!,,'~·· /{" s,o .• , .. •·l -~ K-Sdl ...... ~ -'tri .A.YLCFT N"""I~- R Sf{) PLAN 11·3o) !~'fa' I I r j_ I .JIC 'l"I STA ~ €! ~ 9'4 £;.p o~ ~ll:PJ.iC, .... MP 8-'!'5 !H I ~= •. • I ~~ 1, -\---635· --~ ---~· t ~' l !' % -\ ---_ _I ·-J -f ,., ------1 -,-~ --. ---=....: --_r -T I • . ' "' --.,----1• ------' -I --------,,,,-~f l 'tF( !I :1 · •• 1,S T [( -~1.:: :( Art"IO'II ~r ~~o ---j -..,,,_ ---- . :, I C Tjh$"f /( JoRf;J~ I .,,,, ;,r. .. -1.., ~~, $-~c ,nn ~U.1..E IN f:EET 1 --~;'"'~STAT ~ r'fi)~~(O PR OJ N,'], 0 ·+----------7:;. ---C::: ' ~~ fHV~Ot,LNd.Hl.t.l ...U0 ENGIHEeilNG Sli:RVICI! C:ENTEP. .. r~1~Tf~~ '"Of? :'.IRAl/\lAG[ MaR:~!·'-.lC. S Et ''A\•JNC ')lTA!LS <;i-\f"f"S :::03 PO~. SR99 ~ Washington State Y".t, O.parlment ar Trcnsc::iorioiion P!ERC( CO. LIN£ TO 5. 340TH ST. & S. 310TH ST . TO 5. 2"/2t10 ST. GCB 2168 Pacific Highway S (SR99) S. 359th St Vic to S 344th St Vic HMA Overlay ~vhfhjt ''l\H !'"),..,/ .. ,-.. ---; ~~-, Paving Estimate -Breakdown By Un it Bid Item ritle: ______ ~_11._9_9_:,_;)~·q~l~h_,_,-"h·_ .. .c..'~)~_~_1.c..h_,_1_\_1e_11_11_1\_-_P_J_,'-11~rn~'----- P'I Paving/Safety Rastoration CM:erlir.e 1.engtt'I R1::suriac•n9 Length. I.Nork Item# work lltim pr1tJUllt~(oo J' l"l t1 Pl Cf,•,.-1g lJlostn: 1_ '.•e Jjf}B iltHnJv_r:.:.; '-t ;"sen -'J\le '11 e1,f '-.M rr-er1 ~lqutd AJplni~ 53:-' 1 J~nli-Stripping Add!llve Ho1 Mix Aspbalt 57'1 ~ ?lon1ng Bilurnirious Pavomenl 5767 HM.A for M~mflne 5830 Job Mix. Compliance Price Adjustment 5035 Compaclion Pnce '\djustment xxxx Pavement Re1:.air 6514 Longi\lJdinal Joinl Sea1 ero&lon Conttol & fltallting ,4ri3 IESC t c•~ 641·; l11 1ei P, t clion 64~0 -1~100 -N at~, Pollution C~ntrol Tr:afflc -<l(l(X ,-,·auic Dalo a.,oop :. 550~ Pol"I L~;O 6807 PIMVG wna 6809 Profiled Plc1st1c Line 6828 Plasti~-Wide Lane l111e 6833 Plastic Traffic ~HOWS 6057 Plastic 60sswa1k-Lino 685Y P1a,1ic Slop line ~~-11 .Olasflc Drainage Mark.n9 6884 Raised Pavernenl Marl1or fyps 2 7220 Pa1nrm9 CLirD 6895 ""!"emoorary Pa~~-e_':l ~lark•n~ ShC?rt Jurallon )(XXx Teniporaf'J Signal .~e_lo~t,or> 6956 Sequenliai Arrow ~ign 5973 Other Temporc1~y Tra,~~ ~onlrol f,97,~ Traffic Control Superi,isor 6900 F•aggers and Spoiler~ 6902 Constr_u~t1~n ~1g~_1r.~-·~l~~s A 0992 Otne, r,affic Control Labor 599:! Po<1ao1e Chaf\geabic Message Sign 7441 fron:;pormolo Attenuator 7449 0901,~on cf T ransportabie Altenwalor 1450 ~!~P~'t T~.;i_i:.seo.rt~ble ~nenoa!_?' Othf!:I R efeH,·'lf,lliUJ E·<isMg P)vement \lanung s 7003 "'f:,JH!: B Progress Scr1edule 1400 flond,,do Cla~nup 7725 ~1!'Tl00tqli.lTIOI I for f."u r1 Party Oarnage 17JG SPCC Pian Sublolai for Percentages N -11'.C:<;lh:t ' ~1)1.,5 S1....btotat ,'Vlob11l2 . .i1:01' St,btotal Sales Tax )10 item rotal W.SOOT-TOC Piel.a 3er:sors ins/ill/ vi aslw,qron '3 tate Pat,,, t 7rn;, Nn,,-e,d llem •..)•d1 l---,e,,,, ,.,~,;<>ee cc, 0 ~,.·:,e~"::~:"9• ,eeo, g c;,,p/f., ,\U{/Pe)C/1 .... ,.,,1-,s..,i--101 ~::l :Vla!P.(cll', • ·,µ1>4.u.C11JOO t oi.~I I) 99 4.56 Price per "Unit Mile LM UM ,r ;,I · I i'"'J O_ r1 :.,!<i ~.a1cJ Esl ,2.211 SY SII OOO Ton, C.i ic C•lc !I, C..lc % Sl2 Lf sisal o., j SIOO EA 1 LS $1 .:JO O EA so )0 LF SI W LF ~J. 00 LF ssoo LF sm cA 51 5f Si l LF sso EA 1~ HUN SI 50 LF ;o 25 LF LS $4 HR LS LS ~ HR 120 SF SSS HR s1 HR S,,,00 EA s~, HR ~.ODO EST LS LS ES:' EST i.s .... 1•1•r .. ,, "\j) 1( r-- ,r SECTfON 1 SR !}9 "Aa,nhne MP 7 46 • 8 4; 4 56 Oty 1 I J,.229 3.7 92 Jt, 2"o 1)% 0 "5 nl 50~0 48 10 454 15,075 10.032 1.~84 27 I l68 252 6'.J 1 003 '.10 104 10 000 500 5000 15 000 f50 36 500 500 6H40 ,tQOG soon 1250 $;\ 792 s,~.266 $303,325 $9 ,100 S6 066 So so 52 080 ~6 .500 ~S.000 $46 000 $:J .136 $ HI D90 520,06'1 $9,504 $6 050 ie 116 52 772 3~.250 >I 750 :i 1.505 $9.o76 '> II) :JOO $2.noo $5 000 $15.fJOO ,< 1 250 ll 920 S27 500 >2 000 so ;o $0 S6 A40 "54.000 S'i,000 5~ $ l.25U 'l661) fl6t :i66 387 :5735.153 $73 575 Sfm~ J2B .S76 l:IR6 ~~Of? 1'1 50 ,o so Pl!. RW CN PE RW CN Cost Index Junt: LO 1 '> Base Cost Estimate @ 12·;. (!!! 16% Tutal Inflated Costs to Docombor 2016 to !>ertember 2017 Total Assumptions: $106.346 so S1li6M~7 $1,169,fOJ $111 .238 $0 ., 109 106 $1.220,424 I T/11s pro,ect w1II need apprmomalely 25 da:1s io complete all wori1 ~ Adjusl Sales Ta,11. lo 9 .S~o per Washington State Oe.oartmer•l of Revenue webs1tP. 6;13115 J Constrt.Jctron !::ngineenng adiusted to IO"h 3nd contingenc,es adjustecl to 4 % per Plans P.reparallon Manual dated November 201J ti Preliminary Erig1neenng adJusled to J2\''l oer Cos: Estimalmg Guidance for WSDOT Pro1ects dated Apr1I 2015 5 ~emoYal of '{:,:1L""ecl P:,v~m,i:H1t ,._ar1rnVi Pavumanl ~ark•r1ys. ?lutk line~. 11,1d P:::i1,1t ',.111"r, :u~ 11,c.:1rieri!al to lh1! P!ar·ir-.g Bit11minQuS P:1ve-1non\ .vori<" 6 Removal of Raised Pavement Markers, Pa·Jemenl Mar1':ngs PJaslic Lines and Paint Lines for e~capted Bndges called our to be stnoed th,ough :Jre 1nc:uded :ii the Miscellaneous Cost 7 Gnnd dnd rntay a I 5' HMA one foot n9yond edge110es o: r.:urb-to-curb where lhe shauJde1 1s less thar .:i feet 8 Excapl Two Way Lart Ti;m Ldn~s gnnding one foot into it on eac.:.l'J ~ide [ P1eimo1'-01· E111Jrnee11ng E. .... L:".f,11"~11 .. ~.n ,s•,.t!O.O • rn1i..Jemral1on P.:~1~."l\i,t,4" 'W .)\J .,, ;o 'lC .~hi ,i '"'aty,_s_lAl _________ ~ -,, •o'·/ :-CQ.' GCB 2168 Pacific H1gr1way S (SR99) S T39th St Vic to S 344th St Vic 67 Hi\JIA Overlay ExrnM '8 Page of This page left blank intentionally. 68 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 5, 2015 ITEM#: ----------------~-------=====- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: ORDINANCE: Proposed code amendment related to permits for encroachments into the public right-of-way adding a new section to Chapter 4 .25 FWRC . POLICY QUESTlON: Should the City Council adopt and enact the proposed ordinance adding a new section to Chapter 4.25 FWRC to allow applicants to apply for and acquire permits to add removable, nonpermanent additions to buildings that would encroach into the public right-of-way? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee CATEGORY: D Consent D City Council Business [gJ Ordinance O Resolution STAFF REPORT BY: Mark O_!!hmann , Assistan_t _C_i~---~---- Attachments: Proposed Ordinance MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015 D D Public Hearing Other DEPT: Law Background: The FWRC does not allow removable, nonpermanent additions to buildings-such as awnings and canopies-to encroach into the public right-of-way. Allowing such encroachments into the right-of-way would enhance the aesthetics of new development in the City and improve weather protection for citizens on public sidewalks. The proposed amendment will create a new right-of-way encroachment permit and permitting process for such encroachments. Options Considered: (1) Approve the proposed ordinance and forward to City Council for first reading; or ----------~(~2~)_D_e_c_li_n_e_t_o_a_d_o~p_t _th_e_o_r_d_in_a_n_c_e_a_s_~r_o~o _se_d_a_n_d~r_o_v_id_e_d_ir_ec_t_io_n_to_st_a_ff_. ____ _ DIRECTOR APPROVAL: AjP fl~ .30-/S- l11itial/Date CHIEF OF STAFF: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the proposed ordinance to first reading on January 5, 2015. Bob Celski, Chair Kelly Maloney, Member Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION(S): l 5 T READING OF ORDINANCE (JAN. 5): "I move to forward the proposed ordinance to the January 19, 2015 Council Meeting for second reading and enactment." 2N° READING OF ORDINANCE (JAN. 19): "I move approval of the proposed ordinance." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: O APPROVED O DENI E D O TABLE D/DEFERRED/NO ACTION O MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVIS ED-1 /2015 69 COUNCIL BILL# I ST re11ding En11ctment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION# ORDINANCE NO. ---- AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, adding a new section to Chapter 4.25 FWRC relating to permits for encroachments into the public right-of-way. WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way regulates activities and uses in the public right-of-way in order to protect the use of the public right-of-way, regulate traffic, and promote public health, safety, and welfare; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way Revised Code does not currently allow for removable, nonpermanent additions to buildings to encroach into the right-of-way; and WHEREAS, allowing removable, nonpermanent additions to buildings, such as awnings and canopies, to encroach into the right-of-way would enhance the aesthetics of new development in the City; and WHEREAS, removable, nonpermanent additions to buildings that extend into the right-of- way improve the pedestrian experience by providing weather protection for citizens on public sidewalks; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to modify the regulation of the public right-of-way and finds it reasonable to permit removable, nonpermanent additions to buildings to encroach into the right-of-way under certain circumstances; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 4.25 of the Federal Way Revised Code is hereby amended to add a new section 4.25.105 to read as follows: Ordinance No. 15- 70 Pagelo/4 Rev 1/15 4.25.105 Encroachments into public right-of-way (I) The public works director, or designee, is authorized to issue a permit for removable, nonpermanent additions to buildings to encroach into the public right-of-way at the prope1ty owner's risk and subject to the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall file a completed application with the public works department on the form provided by the department. (b) With the application, the applicant shall submit the fee established by resolution of the City Council. The application shall not be accepted unless it is accompanied by the required fee. (c) Proper plans and specifications for the proposed encroachment are submitted to the public works department. ( d) The encroachment complies with the applicable sections of the Federal Way Revised Code with regard to st:Iuctural safety, traffic, sanitation. fire safety requirements. and any other criteria deemed necessa1y by the public works director or designee. (e) The request shall be evaluated by the public works director, or designee. in regard to any adverse effect on adjoining property. (f) There shall be no interference with the use of the public street for roadway, sidewalk, existing or proposed utilities , and other authorized uses . (g) The applicant shall provide any information or material that the public works directoT, or designee, determines is reasonably necessary to evaluate the request. (h) The encroachment will be maintained in good order. (i) The encroaclunent must be removable so that when requested to do so by the public works director. designee, or other public authority having jurisdiction, the owner will remove the encroachment from the right-of-way at his or her expense. (j) No permanent encroachment into the right-of-way will be allowed under this section. (k) The permit shall be revocable for failure to comply with this chapter by the director of public works or designee. (1) The owner will hold the City of Federal Way and all its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, representatives, and volunteers harmless on account of the encroachment and wi11 provide the City with a certificate of insurance for the encroachment into the right-of-way in an amount approved by the director of public works. (m)The requirements of this Section shall not supersede or act in lieu of permitting requirements under other Sections of the Code. Regardless of any review, approval, inspection. or other actions of the City, it is the responsibility ofthe applicant to ensure that all work, actions, or conditions' on the subject property comply with this title, any permits or approvals granted under this title, and all other applicable laws or permits. Ordinance No. 15- 71 Page 2 o/'1 Rev 1/15 Section 2. The permit fee shall be set at the rate for the right-of-way use permit as prescribed in the City's Fee resolution. Section 3. Severability. Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this chapter, or its application to any person or situation, be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter or its application to any other person or situation. The City Council of the City of Federal Way hereby declares that it would have adopted this chapter and each section, subsection, sentence, clauses, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 4. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this ___ _ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, JIM FERRELL Ordinance No. I 5- 72 Page 3 of~ Rev 1/15 day of ATTEST: CITY CLERK, STEPHANIE COURTNEY, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, AMY JO PEARSALL FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE : ORDINANCE NO.: Ordinance No. JJ-__ 73 Page4 o/4 Rev 1/15