CompiledEIS
CITY HALL
33325 8th Avenue South
Mailing Address: PO Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
(253) 835-7000
www.cityoffederalway.com
September 8, 2006
The City of Federal Way has prepared this City Center Planned Action Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS). Pursuant to State SEPA laws and rules, the City issued a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DEIS) on July 26, 2006. A 30-day comment period followed the DEIS issuance,
during which time verbal and written comment were accepted on the DEIS. A public meeting on the
DEIS was held on July 13, 2006. This FEIS includes all comments received during the comment
period, responses to comments, and corrections and revisions to the DEIS.
The planned action project area is located in the City Center Sub-area of the City of Federal Way,
bounded on the north by South 312th Street; on the south by South 324th Street; on the west by Pacific
Highway South and on the east by 23rd Avenue South.
The proposed action specifically consists of the following:
1. Adoption of an ordinance designating a portion of the City Center sub-area as a planned
action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant
to RCW 43.21C.031(2)(a) and WAC 197-11-164. The planned action designation
would apply to proposed residential, retail, office, hotel, civic and structured parking
development falling within the development envelope analyzed in this EIS.
2. Adoption of a new height of structure standard for multi-unit housing in the City Center
Core (CC-C), including area outside of the planned action project area. The action
alternatives consider height standards of 200’ and 145.’ The No Action Alternative
would not change the existing height standard.
Paper and CD copies may be purchased at FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Center, 31823 Gateway
Center Blvd S, Federal Way. The approximate cost of a black and white paper copy of the Draft EIS
is $6.70. CD copies are also available for approximately $5.00. The document will also be posted on
the City’s website: www.cityoffederalway.com.
Your interest in the City of Federal Way is greatly appreciated. If you would like more information
about this proposal, please contact Patrick Doherty at 253-835-2612.
Sincerely,
Patrick Doherty
Economic Development Director
City of Federal Way
City Center Planned Action Final EIS
Prepared for:
Prepared by:
September 2006
Fact Sheet
Project Title
City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action
Proposed Action and Alternatives
Proposed Action
The action proposed by the City of Federal Way consists of the following related actions by
the City of Federal Way City Council:
1. Adoption of an ordinance designating a portion of the City Center sub-area as a planned
action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant
to RCW 43.21C.031(2)(a) and WAC 197-11-164. The planned action designation would
apply to proposed residential, retail, office, hotel, civic, and structured parking
development falling within the development envelope analyzed in this EIS.
Two action alternatives (Alternatives 1 and 2) assume the comparable development levels
but distribute growth differently. Alternative 1 assumes that growth is focused around
South 320th Street. Alternative 2 distributes future growth more evenly around the
project area.
2. Adoption of a new height of structure standard for multi-unit housing in the City Center
Core (CC-C), including area outside of the planned action project area.
No Planned Action Alternative
The No Action Alternative (Alternative 3) assumes the level and distribution of growth
established in the Comprehensive Plan. The existing standard for height of multi-unit
structures in the City Center Core zone would continue unchanged.
Comprehensive Plan EIS
The City of Federal Way completed an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the City’s
GMA Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations in 1995. This Planned Action EIS
incorporates by reference the analysis contained in the 1995 Comprehensive Plan EIS as it
relates to the City Center sub-area.
Location
The planned action project area is located in the City Center of the City of Federal Way,
bounded on the north by South 312th Street; on the south by South 324th Street; on the west by
Pacific Highway South and on the east by 23rd Avenue South. The proposed Zoning Code
amendment would apply to the entire City Center Core zoning designation.
Proponent
City of Federal Way
Date of Implementation
2006, with phased development following necessary permit approvals
Lead Agency
City of Federal Way
Responsible Official
Kathy McClung, Director, Community Development Services Department
Contact Person
Patrick Doherty, Economic Development Director
33325 8th Ave S
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
253.835-2612
patrickd@cityoffederalway.com
Required Approvals
Planned Action Designation and Ordinance Adoption
Adoption of Zoning Code Amendment for Multi-Unit Residential Structures in the City
Center Core Zone
EIS Authors and Principal Contributors
The Final EIS has been prepared under the direction of the City of Federal Way.
Principal Authors:
Jones & Stokes
11820 Northup Way, Suite E300
Bellevue, WA 98005-1946
425.822.1077
Contributing Authors:
City of Federal Way Public Works Department (transportation)
Mirai Associates
11410 NE 122nd Way, Suite 320
Kirkland WA 98034
425.820.0100
(Transportation)
Otak
117 South Main Street, Suite 400
Seattle, WA 98104
206.442.1371
(sketches)
Public Comment
A public comment period was held between June 26, 2006 and July 25, 2006, during which
time written comment on the Draft EIS was invited. A public meeting regarding the DEIS
was held on July 13, 2006 for interested parties to provide verbal comment.
Date of Draft EIS Issuance
June 26, 2006
Date of Final EIS Issuance
September 8, 2006
Final EIS Purchase Price
Paper and CD copies may be purchased at FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Center, 31823
Gateway Center Blvd S, Federal Way. The approximate cost of a black and white paper copy
of the Final EIS is $6.70 plus tax. CD copies are also available for approximately $5.00.
Previous Environmental Documents
City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan EIS, including the following documents;
CityShape From Vision to Plan Comprehensive Plan Draft EIS, issued November 19, 1993
City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan & Development Regulations Final EIS, issued July
1995
Development Regulations to Implement the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan EIS
Addendum, issued June 1995
Location of Background Information
City of Federal Way Community Development Services Department. See Lead Agency and
Responsible Official Address listed above.
City of Federal Way
City Center Planned Action Final EIS
Prepared for:
City of Federal Way
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, Washington 98063
Prepared by:
11820 Northup Way, Suite E300
Bellevue, Washington 98005-1946
425/822-1077
September 2006
City Center Planned Action i
Draft Planned Action EIS
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Summary.........................................................................................................1-1
1.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................1-1
1.2 Proposed Action and Location................................................................................1-1
Proposed Action......................................................................................................1-1
Location 1-1
1.3 Description of Alternatives......................................................................................1-2
Alternative 1............................................................................................................1-2
Alternative 2............................................................................................................1-2
Alternative 3 (No Action).........................................................................................1-3
1.4 Summary of Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures........................................1-3
1.5 Issues to Be Resolved..........................................................................................1-14
1.6 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts.............................................................1-14
Chapter 2 Description of the Proposal and Alternatives..............................................2-1
2.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................2-1
Overview of the Proposed Action............................................................................2-1
Background.............................................................................................................2-3
Objectives of the Proposal......................................................................................2-5
2.2 Planning Process....................................................................................................2-7
Growth Management Act........................................................................................2-7
City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan..............................................................2-7
Development Regulations.......................................................................................2-7
2.3 Planned Action Process..........................................................................................2-9
Planned Action Overview........................................................................................2-9
Planned Action EIS.................................................................................................2-9
Planned Action Ordinance......................................................................................2-9
2.4 Environmental Review..........................................................................................2-10
Comprehensive Plan EIS......................................................................................2-10
Scope of Review...................................................................................................2-10
2.5 Proposed Action and Alternatives.........................................................................2-11
Overview...............................................................................................................2-11
Alternative 1..........................................................................................................2-14
Alternative 2..........................................................................................................2-15
Alternative 3..........................................................................................................2-16
2.6 Benefits and Disadvantages of Delaying Proposed Action...................................2-17
2.7 Major Issues to be Resolved.................................................................................2-17
Chapter 3 Errata...............................................................................................................3-1
3.1 Revisions to DEIS Air Quality Analysis...................................................................3-1
3.2 Revisions to DEIS Land Use Analysis....................................................................3-2
3.3 Revisions to DEIS Aesthetics, Light and Glare Analysis.........................................3-8
3.4 Revisions to DEIS Transportation Analysis.............................................................3-9
3.5 Revisions to DEIS Public Services Analysis.........................................................3-12
3.6 Corrections Utilities Analysis.................................................................................3-14
City Center Planned Action ii
Draft Planned Action EIS
Chapter 4 Comments and Responses............................................................................4-1
4.1 Public Comments....................................................................................................4-1
4.2 Responses to Comments......................................................................................4-11
Chapter 5 References......................................................................................................5-1
5.1 Printed References.................................................................................................5-1
5.2 Personal Communications......................................................................................5-2
Appendix
Appendix 1. Distribution List
List of Tables
NOTE: DEIS table numbers have been retained in this Final EIS in order to allow for ease of cross-
referencing between the Draft and Final EIS documents. Where table numbers are skipped (i.e., 3-1, 3-6),
the intervening tables are not included in this FEIS and will be found only in the DEIS.
Table 1-1. Summary of Potential Impacts of Proposed Action and No Action Alternative........1-4
Table 2-1. Planned Action Development Envelope..................................................................2-1
Table 2-2. Alternative 1 (South 320th Street Focus)................................................................2-14
Table 2-3. Alternative 1 (South 320th Street Focus)................................................................2-14
Table 2-4. Alternative 2 (Distributed Development)................................................................2-15
Table 2-5. Alternative 2 (Distributed Development)................................................................2-15
Table 2-6. Alternative 3 (No Action)........................................................................................2-16
Table 2-7. Alternative 3 (No Action)........................................................................................2-16
Table 3-1. National and State of Washington Ambient Air Quality Standards..........................3-1
Table 3-6. Vacant and Redevelopable Land Summary............................................................3-4
Table 3-7. City Center Core Permitted Uses and Development Standards..............................3-5
Table 3-8. City Center Frame Permitted Uses and Development Standards...........................3-6
Table 3-23. Alternative 1 and 2 Parking Requirement............................................................3-10
Table 3-30. Intersection Operations by Peak Hour with Mitigation (2009)..............................3-11
Table 3-31. Calls for Service in City Center Project Area.......................................................3-12
Table 3-32. Traffic Enforcement Activity 2005........................................................................3-13
City Center Planned Action iii
Draft Planned Action EIS
Table 3-34. Water and Sewer Service Demand Estimates.....................................................3-14
List of Figures
NOTE: DEIS figure numbers have been retained in this Final EIS in order to allow for ease of cross-
referencing between the Draft and Final EIS documents. Where figure numbers are skipped (i.e., 5, 7),
the intervening tables are not included in this FEIS and will be found only in the DEIS. DEIS figures 9 –
21 are found only in the Draft EIS.
Figure 1. City Center Sub Area..............................................................................................2-2
Figure 2. City Center Zoning Designations............................................................................2-4
Figure 3. Redevelopment Concepts.......................................................................................2-6
Figure 4. City Center Analysis Blocks..................................................................................2-12
Figure 5. Overview of Alternatives.......................................................................................2-13
Figure 7. Vacant and Redevelopable Land............................................................................3-3
Figure 8. Comprehensive Plan Designations.........................................................................3-7
City Center Planned Action 1-1
Draft Planned Action EIS
Chapter 1
Summary
1.1 Introduction
This chapter summarizes information contained in this Planned Action Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS). It contains a summary of the alternatives, significant impacts, mitigation
measures, and significant unavoidable adverse impacts. This summary is intentionally brief;
the reader should consult individual sections of theis Draft EIS for detailed information
concerning the affected environment, impacts and mitigation measures. Text that has been
inserted or deleted since the Draft EIS is shown in cross-out or underline format.
1.2 Proposed Action and Location
Proposed Action
The Proposed Action consist of two related elements:
Adoption of an ordinance designating a portion of the City Center sub-area as a “planned
action” for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant
to RCW 43.21C.031(2)(a) and WAC 197-11-164. The planned action would apply to
residential, retail, office, lodging, civic and structured parking development projects
falling within the development envelope and project area analyzed in this EIS. The
planned action designation would apply to development that occurs through 2014.
This action may also include procedural text amendments to the Federal Way Municipal
Code (FWMC) Chapter 22 (Zoning Code) to recognize the Planned Action designation
and process. These changes are not expected to have an environmental impact and are
not discussed further in this EIS.
Adoption of a new structure height standard for multi-unit housing in the City Center
Core zoning designation in the City Center sub-area.
Location
The City Center project area is located within the City of Federal Way; bounded on the south
by South 324th Street; on the north by South 312th Street; on the west by Pacific Highway
South; and on the east by 23rd Avenue South.
For the purpose of this EIS the planned action project area has been divided into three smaller
analysis areas, referred to as Blocks 1, 2 and 3:
City Center Planned Action 1-2
Draft Planned Action EIS
Block 1 consists of the northern portion of the project area and is bounded on the north
by S 312th Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, on the south by South 316th
Street and on the east by 23rd Avenue S;
Block 2 is located in the central portion of the project area and is bounded on the north by
S 316th Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, on the south by S 320th Street and
on the east by 23rd Avenue S.; and
Block 3 located in the southern portion of the project area and consists mainly of The
Commons at Federal Way. Block 3 is bounded on the north by S 320th Street, on the west
by Pacific Highway South, on the south by S 324th Street and on the east by 23rd Avenue
S.
The proposed change to the height standard for multi-unit residential structures would apply
to all area within the City-Center Core zone. This area is generally bounded by Pacific
Highway South on the west, South 324th Street on the south, Interstate 5 on the east and South
316th and 317th streets on the north.
1.3 Description of Alternatives
This EIS describes two action alternatives and one no-action alternative for the proposed
action. These different scenarios are intended to allow the City to test the impacts of two
different growth patterns and to bracket the range of growth that is likely to occur within the
project area. If adopted, the planned action designation would based on the total
development envelope described in Chapter 2. Adoption of a specific action alternative is not
necessary for implementation of the proposal.
Similarly, the alternative height scenarios are associated with different alternatives for the
purpose of analysis in this EIS. They are not dependent on either alternative and the City
may adopt either height standard regardless of any decisions related to the planned action
designation.
Alternative 1
The proposed land use pattern would create a dense, mixed-use urban neighborhood within
the City Center. Growth would be focused around South 320th Street, with 47% of the new
growth occurring in Block 2 and 41% in Block 3. This alternative would increase the
permitted structure height for multi-unit housing in the City Center Core to 200 feet.
Alternative 2
The proposed land use pattern in Alternative 2 would be similar to Alternative 1, however,
growth would be distributes more evenly throughout the project area. Under this
Alternative, approximately 30% of the new growth would occurring in Block 3, with the
remaining growth spread between Blocks 1 and 2. This alternative would increase the
permitted structure height for multi-unit housing in the City Center Core to 145 feet.
City Center Planned Action 1-3
Draft Planned Action EIS
Alternative 3 (No Action)
Alternative 3 assumes the level and distribution of growth will continued as currently
established in the Comprehensive Plan. Existing structure height standards would continue
unchanged.
1.4 Summary of Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Table 1-1 provides a summary of the environmental impacts for each element of the
environment evaluated in Chapter 3 of the Draft EIS. For a complete discussion of the
elements of the environment considered in the Draft EIS, please refer to Draft EIS Chapter 3.
Cit
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Dr
a
f
t
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
E
I
S
1-
4
Ta
b
l
e
1
-
1
.
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
f
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
N
o
A
c
t
i
o
n
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
So
u
t
h
3
2
0
th
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
o
c
u
s
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
2
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
No
A
c
t
i
o
n
Ai
r
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
Sh
o
r
t
T
e
r
m
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
Im
p
a
c
t
s
C
o
m
m
o
n
t
o
A
l
l
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
Im
p
a
c
t
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
T
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
,
l
o
c
a
l
i
z
e
d
i
m
pa
c
t
s
c
a
u
s
e
d
b
y
f
u
g
i
t
i
v
e
d
u
s
t
d
u
r
i
n
g
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Od
o
r
s
S
h
o
r
t
t
e
r
m
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
l
i
z
e
d
o
d
o
r
s
c
o
u
l
d
r
e
s
u
l
t
d
u
r
i
n
g
p
a
v
i
n
g
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
u
s
i
n
g
t
a
r
a
n
d
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
Ex
h
a
u
s
t
e
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
E
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
t
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
l
i
z
e
d
Lo
n
g
T
e
r
m
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
Ca
r
b
o
n
m
o
n
o
x
i
d
e
(
CO
)
co
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
i
s
p
r
e
d
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
hi
g
h
e
r
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
t
r
i
p
s
t
h
a
n
a
n
y
o
t
h
e
r
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
.
C
O
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
t
ea
c
h
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
m
o
d
e
l
e
d
f
o
r
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
a
r
e
a
l
l
b
e
l
o
w
t
h
e
al
l
o
w
a
b
l
e
a
m
b
i
e
n
t
a
i
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
T
h
u
s
,
n
o
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
i
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
a
r
e
ex
p
e
c
t
e
d
.
CO
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
l
e
s
s
t
h
a
n
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
.
CO
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
l
e
s
s
t
h
a
n
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
.
Cit
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Dr
a
f
t
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
E
I
S
1-
5
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
So
u
t
h
3
2
0
th
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
o
c
u
s
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
2
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
No
A
c
t
i
o
n
Mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
Sh
o
r
t
T
e
r
m
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
th
e
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
u
l
d
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
f
u
g
i
t
i
v
e
d
u
s
t
,
w
h
i
c
h
c
o
u
l
d
b
e
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
e
d
u
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
b
e
s
t
ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
:
Us
e
w
a
t
e
r
s
p
r
a
y
s
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
n
o
n
-
t
o
x
i
c
d
u
s
t
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
m
e
t
h
o
d
s
o
n
u
n
p
a
v
e
d
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
s
.
Mi
n
i
m
i
z
e
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
p
e
e
d
w
h
i
l
e
t
r
a
v
e
l
i
n
g
o
n
u
n
p
a
v
e
d
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
s
.
Pr
e
v
e
n
t
t
r
a
c
k
o
u
t
o
f
m
u
d
o
n
t
o
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
Co
v
e
r
s
o
i
l
p
i
l
e
s
w
h
e
n
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
l
.
To
t
h
e
e
x
t
e
n
t
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
l
,
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
w
o
r
k
d
u
r
i
n
g
p
e
r
i
o
d
s
o
f
h
i
g
h
w
i
n
d
s
.
Bu
r
n
i
n
g
o
f
s
l
a
s
h
o
r
d
e
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
d
e
b
r
i
s
i
s
no
t
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
P
u
g
e
t
S
o
u
n
d
C
l
e
a
n
A
i
r
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
(PS
C
A
A
).
N
o
s
l
a
s
h
b
u
r
n
i
n
g
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
f
o
r
an
y
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
.
Mo
b
i
l
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
p
o
r
t
a
b
l
e
s
t
a
t
i
on
a
r
y
e
n
g
i
n
e
s
w
o
u
l
d
e
m
i
t
a
i
r
p
o
l
l
u
t
a
n
t
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
ni
t
r
o
g
e
n
d
i
o
x
i
d
e
(
No
x
),
C
O
,
a
n
d
pa
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
t
e
m
a
t
t
e
r
s
m
a
l
l
e
r
t
h
a
n
1
0
m
i
c
r
o
n
s
(PM
1
0
).
T
h
e
s
e
e
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
t
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
l
i
z
e
d
.
I
t
i
s
h
i
g
h
l
y
u
n
l
i
k
e
l
y
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
t
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
e
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
w
o
u
l
d
c
a
u
s
e
a
m
b
i
e
n
t
c
o
nc
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
t
a
d
j
o
i
n
i
n
g
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
t
o
ap
p
r
o
a
c
h
t
h
e
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
A
m
b
i
e
n
t
A
i
r
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
(NA
A
Q
S
) li
m
i
t
s
.
T
y
p
i
c
a
l
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
t
o
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
a
i
r
qu
a
l
i
t
y
a
n
d
o
d
o
r
i
s
s
u
e
s
c
a
u
s
e
d
by
t
a
i
l
p
i
p
e
e
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
:
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
e
n
g
i
n
e
s
o
f
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
ac
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
t
o
m
a
n
u
f
a
c
t
u
r
e
r
s
’
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Mi
n
i
m
i
z
e
i
d
l
i
n
g
o
f
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
w
h
i
l
e
t
h
e
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
n
o
t
i
n
u
s
e
.
Lo
n
g
T
e
r
m
Th
e
C
O
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
m
o
d
e
l
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
i
s
a
i
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
a
c
co
u
n
t
f
o
r
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
l
r
e
a
d
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
a
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
.
Th
e
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
i
s
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
d
i
c
a
te
s
a
l
l
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
w
o
u
l
d
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
c
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
c
a
r
bo
n
m
o
n
o
x
i
d
e
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
l
y
,
n
o
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
ai
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
,
a
n
d
n
o
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
a
i
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
i
s
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
.
Cit
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Dr
a
f
t
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
E
I
S
1-
6
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
So
u
t
h
3
2
0
th
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
o
c
u
s
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
2
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
No
A
c
t
i
o
n
3.
2
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
La
n
d
U
s
e
P
a
t
t
e
r
n
s
Fo
c
u
s
o
f
n
e
w
g
r
o
w
t
h
Ne
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
f
o
c
u
s
e
d
i
n
Bl
o
c
k
s
2
a
n
d
3
.
B
l
o
c
k
1
w
i
l
l
a
l
s
o
ex
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
n
e
w
g
r
o
w
t
h
b
u
t
a
t
a
re
l
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
l
o
w
e
r
l
e
v
e
l
t
h
a
n
i
n
B
l
o
c
k
s
2
an
d
3
.
Si
m
i
l
a
r
t
o
t
a
l
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
s
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
b
u
t
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
m
o
r
e
ev
e
n
l
y
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
.
Bl
o
c
k
1
w
o
u
l
d
e
x
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
g
r
e
a
t
e
r
g
r
o
w
t
h
a
n
d
di
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
u
s
e
s
t
h
a
n
i
n
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
,
b
u
t
t
h
e
ov
e
r
a
l
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
l
e
v
e
l
s
o
n
B
l
o
c
k
1
w
o
u
l
d
co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
b
e
l
e
s
s
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
t
h
a
n
B
l
o
c
k
s
2
a
n
d
3.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
i
l
l
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
f
y
i
n
t
h
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
b
u
t
t
o
a
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
l
y
l
e
s
s
e
r
d
e
g
r
e
e
t
h
a
n
un
d
e
r
t
h
e
o
t
h
e
r
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
.
Ne
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
2
0
1
4
Ne
w
r
e
t
a
i
l
s
p
a
c
e
:
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
s
f
S
a
m
e
a
s
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
2
2
0
,
2
7
0
s
f
Ne
w
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
p
a
c
e
:
3
5
0
,
0
0
0
s
f
S
a
m
e
a
s
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
1
0
4
,
4
4
6
s
f
Ne
w
h
o
t
e
l
r
o
o
m
s
:
6
0
0
S
a
m
e
a
s
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
-
Ne
w
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
:
7
5
0
S
a
m
e
a
s
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
2
7
0
Ne
w
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
a
l
l
s
:
7
5
0
S
a
m
e
a
s
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
-
Ci
v
i
c
U
s
e
s
:
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
s
f
S
a
m
e
a
s
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
-
Im
p
a
c
t
s
C
o
m
m
o
n
t
o
A
l
l
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
L
a
n
d
u
s
e
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
s
w
i
l
l
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
f
y
a
n
d
t
h
e
m
i
x
o
f
u
s
e
s
w
i
l
l
i
n
c
r
ea
s
e
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
g
r
e
a
t
e
r
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
i
n
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
.
Ov
e
r
t
i
m
e
,
t
h
e
s
c
a
l
e
o
f
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
m
a
y
a
l
s
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
a
s
n
e
w
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
c
c
u
r
s
a
n
d
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
h
e
i
g
h
t
s
a
r
e
m
a
x
i
m
i
z
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
w
i
t
h
d
e
n
si
t
y
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
.
La
n
d
U
s
e
C
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
Cit
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Dr
a
f
t
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
E
I
S
1-
7
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
So
u
t
h
3
2
0
th
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
o
c
u
s
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
2
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
No
A
c
t
i
o
n
Mu
l
t
i
-
U
n
i
t
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
He
i
g
h
t
:
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
o
2
0
0
’
f
o
r
m
u
l
t
i
-
un
i
t
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
y
no
t
i
c
e
a
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
Co
r
e
z
o
n
e
,
b
u
t
i
s
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
l
y
co
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
h
e
i
g
h
t
a
n
d
bu
l
k
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
i
s
z
o
n
i
n
g
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
.
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
o
1
4
5
’
f
o
r
m
u
l
t
i
-
u
n
i
t
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
c
o
m
p
a
r
a
b
l
e
t
o
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
he
i
g
h
t
l
i
m
i
t
f
o
r
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
a
n
d
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
co
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
us
e
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
i
s
z
o
n
i
n
g
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
.
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
h
e
i
g
h
t
l
i
m
i
t
f
o
r
m
u
l
t
i
-
u
n
i
t
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
w
o
u
l
d
re
m
a
i
n
u
n
c
h
a
n
g
e
d
.
N
o
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
a
r
e
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
.
Im
p
a
c
t
s
C
o
m
m
o
n
t
o
A
l
l
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
L
a
n
d
u
s
e
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
c
o
u
l
d
r
e
s
u
l
t
u
n
d
e
r
a
n
y
o
f
t
h
e
a
l
t
e
rn
a
t
i
v
e
s
a
n
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
a
n
y
o
f
t
h
e
t
i
m
e
p
e
r
i
o
d
s
.
A
s
v
a
c
a
n
t
l
a
n
d
is
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
an
d
o
t
h
e
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
r
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
,
u
s
e
s
t
ha
t
a
r
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
a
n
d
b
u
f
f
e
r
e
d
f
r
om
e
a
c
h
o
t
h
e
r
w
i
l
l
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
c
o
-
e
x
i
st
i
n
c
l
o
s
e
r
pr
o
x
i
m
i
t
y
.
T
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
o
r
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
u
s
e
s
w
i
t
h
d
i
f
f
e
r
i
ng
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
l
e
v
e
l
s
w
i
l
l
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
a
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
i
n
a
g
r
ea
t
e
r
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
an
d
m
i
x
o
f
u
s
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
.
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
a
r
o
u
n
d
t
h
e
e
d
g
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
w
i
t
h
l
o
w
e
r
i
n
t
en
s
i
t
y
u
s
e
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
s
i
n
g
l
e
a
n
d
m
u
l
t
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
c
o
u
l
d
ex
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
.
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
,
E
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
N
e
w
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
m
o
s
t
co
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
e
d
i
n
B
l
o
c
k
s
2
a
n
d
3
.
Ne
w
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
wo
u
l
d
b
e
m
o
r
e
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
t
h
a
n
i
n
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
.
Th
e
r
e
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
l
y
l
e
s
s
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
em
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
m
p
a
r
e
d
t
o
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
1
an
d
2
.
Im
p
a
c
t
s
C
o
m
m
o
n
t
o
A
l
l
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
U
n
d
e
r
a
l
l
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
,
f
u
t
u
r
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
l
l
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
,
t
h
o
u
g
h
a
t
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
r
a
t
e
s
a
n
d
a
m
o
u
n
t
s
.
Mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
a
l
o
n
g t
h
e
e
d
ges
o
f
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
a
r
e
a
a
p
p
e
a
r
t
o
b
e
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
f
o
r
a
c
o
m
pa
t
i
b
l
e
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
m
o
r
e
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
t
o
l
e
s
s
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
us
e
s
.
Ho
w
e
v
e
r
,
a
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
c
c
u
r
s
,
t
h
i
s
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
r
e
a
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
ev
a
l
u
a
t
e
d
t
o
c
o
n
f
i
r
m
t
h
a
t
l
o
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
i
m
p
a
c
ts
a
r
e
n
o
t
b
e
i
n
g
c
r
e
a
t
e
d
.
I
f
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
,
n
e
w
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
e
d
g
e
a
r
e
a
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
.
T
e
c
h
n
i
qu
e
s
c
o
u
l
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
i
t
e
a
n
d
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
l
i
m
i
t
s
,
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
en
t
s
f
o
r
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
n
o
i
s
e
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
me
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
Cit
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Dr
a
f
t
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
E
I
S
1-
8
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
So
u
t
h
3
2
0
th
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
o
c
u
s
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
2
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
No
A
c
t
i
o
n
3.
3
A
e
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
s
,
L
i
g
h
t
G
l
a
r
e
Vi
s
u
a
l
C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
o
2
0
0
’
f
o
r
m
u
l
t
i
-
un
i
t
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
y
no
t
i
c
e
a
b
l
e
,
b
u
t
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
wi
t
h
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
in
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
C
o
r
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
c
h
a
n
g
e
i
s
no
t
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
t
o
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
im
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
v
i
s
u
a
l
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
.
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
o
1
4
5
’
f
o
r
m
u
l
t
i
-
u
n
i
t
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
c
o
m
p
a
r
a
b
l
e
t
o
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
he
i
g
h
t
l
i
m
i
t
f
o
r
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
a
n
d
i
s
n
o
t
ex
p
e
c
t
e
d
t
o
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
vi
s
u
a
l
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
C
o
r
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
.
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
h
e
i
g
h
t
l
i
m
i
t
f
o
r
m
u
l
t
i
-
u
n
i
t
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
w
o
u
l
d
re
m
a
i
n
u
n
c
h
a
n
g
e
d
.
Im
p
a
c
t
s
C
o
m
m
o
n
t
o
A
l
l
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
Vi
s
u
a
l
C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
U
n
d
e
r
a
l
l
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
,
t
he
v
i
s
u
a
l
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
w
i
l
l
ch
a
n
g
e
o
v
e
r
t
i
m
e
f
r
o
m
t
h
a
t
o
f
a
t
y
p
i
c
a
l
lo
w
-
s
c
a
l
e
s
u
b
u
r
b
a
n
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
ce
n
t
e
r
t
o
a
m
o
r
e
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
m
i
d
-
r
i
s
e
a
n
d
h
i
g
h
-
r
i
s
e
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
c
e
n
t
er
.
T
h
e
m
a
g
n
i
t
u
d
e
o
f
t
h
i
s
c
h
a
n
g
e
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
g
r
e
a
t
e
r
u
n
d
e
r
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
1
an
d
2
t
h
a
n
u
n
d
e
r
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
.
Li
g
h
t
a
n
d
G
l
a
r
e
L
i
g
h
t
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
,
s
t
r
e
e
t
li
g
h
t
s
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
s
a
n
d
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
w
o
u
l
d
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
as
a
r
e
s
u
l
t
o
f
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
u
n
d
e
r
a
n
y
o
f
t
h
e
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
.
T
h
e
r
e
i
s
a
l
s
o
t
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
o
r
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
g
l
a
r
e
d
e
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
o
n
t
h
e
t
y
p
e
o
f
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
u
s
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
op
m
e
n
t
.
T
h
e
ma
g
n
i
t
u
d
e
o
f
t
h
i
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
i
s
l
i
k
e
l
y
t
o
b
e
h
i
g
h
e
r
u
n
d
e
r
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
1
a
n
d
2
.
Vi
e
w
s
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
n
e
w
h
i
g
h
a
n
d
m
i
d
-
r
i
s
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
c
o
u
l
d
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
d
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
v
i
e
w
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
l
o
w
-
r
i
s
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s l
o
c
a
t
e
d
n
e
a
r
t
h
e
s
e
si
t
e
s
a
n
d
f
r
o
m
p
u
b
l
i
c
r
i
g
h
t
s
-
o
f
w
a
y
s.
N
o
i
m
p
a
c
t
t
o
p
u
b
l
i
c
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
o
r
p
a
r
k
s
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
.
Sh
a
d
i
n
g
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
T
h
e
r
e
i
s
a
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
o
r
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
s
h
a
d
o
w
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
f
r
o
m
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
a
l
l
e
r
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.
I
n
t
h
e
s
h
o
r
t
t
e
r
m
,
t
hi
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
m
o
s
t
n
o
t
i
c
e
a
b
l
e
a
t
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
l
o
w
-
r
i
s
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
n
e
w
t
a
l
l
e
r
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.
I
n
t
h
e
l
o
n
g
t
e
r
m
,
a
s
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
s
w
i
t
h
t
a
l
l
e
r
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
lo
c
a
t
e
d
i
n
cl
o
s
e
r
p
r
o
x
i
m
i
t
y
t
o
o
n
e
a
n
o
t
h
e
r
,
t
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
o
r
g
r
e
a
t
e
r
s
h
a
d
i
ng
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
c
o
u
l
d
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
.
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
1
a
n
d
2
w
i
l
l
h
a
v
e
ta
l
l
e
r
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
i
n
a
m
o
r
e
c
o
m
p
a
c
t
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
,
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
o
r
g
r
e
a
t
e
r
s
h
a
d
i
n
g
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
c
o
m
p
a
r
e
d
t
o
d
e
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
.
Mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
a
n
d
r
e
v
i
ew
/
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
t
o
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
a
n
d
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
a
ss
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
l
i
g
h
t
a
n
d
g
l
a
r
e
,
s
h
a
d
o
w
s
,
a
n
d
ae
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
h
e
i
g
h
t
f
o
r
m
u
l
t
i
-
u
n
i
t
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Ce
n
t
e
r
C
o
r
e
z
o
n
e
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
o
n
l
y
w
i
t
h
r
e
v
i
e
w
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
d
e
s
i
g
n
r
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
pr
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
a
s
s
e
t
f
o
r
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
.
Mo
n
i
t
o
r
s
h
a
d
e
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
a
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
c
c
u
r
s
a
n
d
a
m
e
n
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
t
o
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
i
t
e
-
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
s
h
a
d
o
w
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
i
n
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
l
a
c
e
s
a
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
.
Cit
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Dr
a
f
t
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
E
I
S
1-
9
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
So
u
t
h
3
2
0
th
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
o
c
u
s
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
2
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
No
A
c
t
i
o
n
3.
4
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
20
0
9
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
P
M
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
–
F
i
v
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
ex
c
e
e
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
th
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
,
f
o
c
u
s
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
S
2
7
2
nd
St
r
e
e
t
a
n
d
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
.
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
–
T
w
o
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
ex
c
e
e
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
th
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
,
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
I
-
5
no
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
r
a
m
p
a
n
d
M
i
l
i
t
a
r
y
R
o
a
d
S/
S
2
7
2
nd
S
t
r
e
e
t
.
Sa
t
u
r
d
a
y
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
–
F
o
u
r
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
e
x
c
e
e
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
de
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
t
h
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
,
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
r
o
u
n
d
th
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
.
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
–
F
i
v
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
e
x
c
e
e
d
t
h
e
Cit
y
’
s
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
t
h
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
,
f
o
c
u
s
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
S
27
2
nd
S
t
r
e
e
t
a
n
d
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
.
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
–
T
w
o
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
e
x
c
e
e
d
t
h
e
Cit
y
’
s
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
t
h
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
,
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
I
-
5
no
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
r
a
m
p
a
n
d
M
i
l
i
t
a
r
y
R
o
a
d
S
/
S
2
7
2
nd
St
r
e
e
t
.
Sa
t
u
r
d
a
y
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
–
F
o
u
r
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
ex
c
e
e
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
t
h
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
,
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
ar
o
u
n
d
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
.
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
–
F
i
v
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
e
x
c
e
e
d
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
t
h
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
,
f
o
c
u
s
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
S
2
7
2
nd
St
r
e
e
t
a
n
d
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
.
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
–
T
w
o
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
e
x
c
e
e
d
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
t
h
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
,
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
I
-
5
no
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
r
a
m
p
a
n
d
M
i
l
i
t
a
r
y
R
o
a
d
S
/
S
2
7
2
nd
St
r
e
e
t
.
Sa
t
u
r
d
a
y
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
–
T
w
o
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
e
x
c
e
e
d
th
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
t
h
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
,
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
S
3
2
0
th
St
r
e
e
t
/
2
0
th
A
v
e
S
a
n
d
S
3
2
0
th
S
t
r
e
e
t
/
2
3
rd
A
v
e
S
.
20
1
4
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
I
n
2
0
1
4
,
a
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
4,
0
0
0
4,
3
3
4
s
p
a
c
e
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
co
m
p
a
r
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
N
o
A
c
t
i
o
n
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
.
T
h
e
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
11
,
4
9
0
11
,
8
2
3
s
t
a
l
l
s
.
In
2
0
1
4
,
a
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
4,
0
0
0
4,
3
3
4
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
s
p
a
c
e
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
c
o
m
p
a
r
e
d
to
t
h
e
N
o
A
c
t
i
o
n
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
.
T
h
e
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
pa
r
k
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
ar
e
a
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
11
,
4
9
0
11
,
8
2
3
st
a
l
l
s
.
In
2
0
1
4
,
a
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
,
5
4
0
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
sp
a
c
e
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
f
o
r
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
Th
e
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Ce
n
t
e
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
7
,
4
8
5
st
a
l
l
s
.
Cit
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Dr
a
f
t
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
E
I
S
1-
1
0
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
So
u
t
h
3
2
0
th
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
o
c
u
s
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
2
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
No
A
c
t
i
o
n
20
1
4
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
D
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
P
M
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
,
a
n
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
n
e
a
r
l
y
2
,
4
0
0
t
r
i
p
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
ad
d
e
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
2
0
1
0
a
n
d
2
0
1
4
,
co
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
e
d
o
n
S
3
2
0
th
S
t
r
e
e
t
a
n
d
Pa
c
i
f
i
c
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
.
T
o
t
a
l
P
M
pe
a
k
h
o
u
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
g
r
o
w
t
h
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
fr
o
m
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
5
,
1
0
0
t
r
i
p
s
.
D
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
AM
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
,
n
e
a
r
l
y
1
,
1
0
0
t
r
i
p
s
wo
u
l
d
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
2
0
1
0
a
n
d
20
1
4
,
f
o
c
u
s
e
d
o
n
S
o
u
t
h
3
2
0
th
S
t
r
e
e
t
.
To
t
a
l
A
M
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
g
r
o
w
t
h
re
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
2
,
2
0
0
t
r
i
p
s
.
D
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
Sa
t
u
r
d
a
y
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
,
s
l
i
g
h
t
l
y
o
v
e
r
2,
5
0
0
t
r
i
p
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
20
1
0
a
n
d
2
0
1
4
.
T
o
t
a
l
S
a
t
u
r
d
a
y
p
e
a
k
ho
u
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
g
r
o
w
t
h
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
12
,
1
0
0
t
r
i
p
s
.
Du
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
P
M
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
,
a
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
n
e
a
r
l
y
2,
4
0
0
t
r
i
p
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
2
0
1
0
a
n
d
20
1
4
,
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
e
d
o
n
S
3
2
0
th
S
t
r
e
e
t
a
n
d
Pa
c
i
f
i
c
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
.
T
o
t
a
l
P
M
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
tr
a
f
f
i
c
g
r
o
w
t
h
u
n
d
e
r
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
2
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y 5
,
1
0
0
t
r
i
p
s
.
D
u
r
i
n
g t
h
e
A
M
p
e
a
k
ho
u
r
,
n
e
a
r
l
y
1
,
1
0
0
t
r
i
p
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
be
t
w
e
e
n
2
0
1
0
a
n
d
2
0
1
4
,
f
o
c
u
s
e
d
o
n
S
o
u
t
h
32
0
th
S
t
r
e
e
t
.
T
o
t
a
l
A
M
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
g
r
o
w
t
h
re
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
2
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
2
,
2
0
0
t
r
i
p
s
.
D
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
Sa
t
u
r
d
a
y
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
,
s
l
i
g
h
t
l
y
o
v
e
r
2
,
5
0
0
t
r
i
p
s
wo
u
l
d
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
2
0
1
0
a
n
d
2
0
1
4
i
n
t
h
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
.
T
o
t
a
l
S
a
t
u
r
d
a
y
p
e
a
k
ho
u
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
g
r
o
w
t
h
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
2
wo
u
l
d
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
2
,
1
0
0
t
r
i
p
s
.
Ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
a
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
4
2
0
n
e
w
P
M
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
tr
i
p
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
t
o
a
r
e
a
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
20
1
0
a
n
d
2
0
1
4
.
T
o
t
a
l
P
M
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
g
r
o
w
t
h
un
d
e
r
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
8
6
0
tr
i
p
s
.
D
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
A
M
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
,
a
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
2
1
4
tr
i
p
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
.
T
o
t
a
l
A
M
p
e
a
k
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
g
r
o
w
t
h
re
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
45
0
t
r
i
p
s
.
D
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
S
a
t
u
r
d
a
y
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
,
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
4
4
0
t
r
i
p
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
20
1
0
a
n
d
2
1
0
4
.
T
o
t
a
l
S
a
t
u
r
d
a
y
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
gr
o
w
t
h
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
,
0
5
0
t
r
i
p
s
.
Im
p
a
c
t
s
C
o
m
m
o
n
t
o
A
l
l
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
P
r
o
b
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
c
o
l
l
i
s
i
on
s
w
o
u
l
d
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
w
i
t
h
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
.
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
R
i
d
e
r
s
h
i
p
d
e
m
a
n
d
a
t
t
h
e
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
W
a
y
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
er
m
a
y
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
w
i
t
h
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
A
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
ed
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
.
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
M
o
b
i
l
i
t
y
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
ed
i
n
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
w
o
u
l
d
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
d
e
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
.
Mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Sa
m
e
a
s
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
:
2nd
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
a
t
S
31
2
th
S
t
/
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
Op
t
i
m
i
z
e
s
i
g
n
a
l
t
i
m
i
n
g
a
t
S
3
3
6
th
St
/
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
Sa
m
e
a
s
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
:
2nd
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
a
t
S
3
1
2
th
St
/
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
Op
t
i
m
i
z
e
s
i
g
n
a
l
t
i
m
i
n
g
a
t
S
3
3
6
th
S
t
/
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
Hig
h
w
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
2nd
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
a
t
S
3
1
2
th
S
t
/
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
Op
t
i
m
i
z
e
s
i
g
n
a
l
t
i
m
i
n
g
a
t
S
3
3
6
th
S
t
/
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
So
u
t
h
Cit
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Dr
a
f
t
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
E
I
S
1-
1
1
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
So
u
t
h
3
2
0
th
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
o
c
u
s
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
2
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
No
A
c
t
i
o
n
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
N
o
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
N
o
m
i
ti
g
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
N
o
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
Sa
t
u
r
d
a
y
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
as
s
h
o
w
n
un
d
e
r
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
:
So
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
a
n
d
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
tu
r
n
l
a
n
e
s
a
t
S
3
2
0
th
S
t
/
2
0
th
A
v
e
S
Se
c
o
n
d
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
a
t
S
3
2
0
th
S
t
/
2
3
rd
A
v
e
S
In
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
ar
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
wo
u
l
d
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
f
fo
r
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
1
o
r
2
:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
a
t
S
3
1
6
th
St
/
P
a
c
H
w
y
S
No
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
a
t
S
3
2
0
th
St
/
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
a
t
S
3
2
0
th
St
/
2
3
rd
A
v
e
S
Mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
as
s
h
o
w
n
u
n
d
e
r
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
:
So
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
a
n
d
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
s
a
t
S
3
2
0
th
S
t
/
2
0
th
A
v
e
S
Se
c
o
n
d
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
a
t
S
3
2
0
th
St
/
2
3
rd
A
v
e
S
In
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
me
a
s
u
r
e
s
ar
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
f
o
r
wo
u
l
d
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
im
p
a
c
t
s
o
f
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
1
o
r
2
:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
a
t
S
3
1
6
th
S
t
/
P
a
c
Hw
y
S
No
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
a
t
S
3
2
0
th
S
t
/
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
Hig
h
w
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
a
t
S
3
2
0
th
S
t
/
2
3
rd
Av
e
S
So
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
a
n
d
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
s
a
t
S
32
0
th
S
t
/
2
0
th
A
v
e
S
Se
c
o
n
d
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
a
t
S
3
2
0
th
S
t
/
2
3
rd
Av
e
S
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
a
r
e
a
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
im
p
a
c
t
s
,
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
o
n
-
s
i
t
e
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
m
e
e
t
c
i
t
y
a
n
d
s
t
a
t
e
co
m
m
u
t
e
r
t
r
i
p
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
d
e
m
a
n
d
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
m
a
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
:
On
-
s
i
t
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
No
n
-
m
o
t
o
r
i
z
e
d
m
o
d
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Gr
i
d
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Ri
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
d
e
m
a
n
d
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
Cit
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Dr
a
f
t
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
E
I
S
1-
1
2
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
So
u
t
h
3
2
0
th
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
o
c
u
s
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
2
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
No
A
c
t
i
o
n
3.
5
P
u
b
l
i
c
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Po
l
i
c
e
L
O
S
E
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
g
r
o
w
t
h
w
i
l
l
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
a
n
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
n
e
e
d
o
f
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
8
of
f
i
c
e
r
s
b
y
2
0
1
4
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
cu
r
r
e
n
t
L
O
S
.
Sa
m
e
a
s
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
.
E
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
f
u
t
u
r
e
g
r
o
w
t
h
w
i
l
l
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
a
n
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
ne
e
d
o
f
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
2
o
f
f
i
c
e
r
s
b
y
2
0
1
4
t
o
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
L
O
S
.
Pa
r
k
a
n
d
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
L
O
S
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
w
i
l
l
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
a
n
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
d
e
m
a
n
d
f
o
r
1
9
.
3
a
c
r
e
s
o
f
ne
w
p
a
r
k
la
n
d
in
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
to
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
cu
r
r
e
n
t
L
O
S
.
Sa
m
e
a
s
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
.
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
w
i
l
l
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
a
n
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
de
m
a
n
d
f
o
r
7
a
c
r
e
s
o
f
n
e
w
p
a
r
k
la
n
d
in
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
to
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
L
O
S
.
Im
p
a
c
t
s
C
o
m
m
o
n
t
o
A
l
l
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
Po
l
i
c
e
&
F
i
r
e
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
m
a
y
a
f
f
e
c
t
t
h
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
i
m
e
s
o
f
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
Fir
e
F
u
t
u
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
a
n
i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
c
a
l
l
s
f
o
r
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
n
d
f
u
t
u
r
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
g
r
o
w
t
h
m
a
y
i
m
p
ac
t
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
ti
m
e
.
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
W
a
y
F
i
r
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
r
e
p
o
r
t
s
t
h
a
t
i
t
h
a
s
ad
e
q
u
a
t
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
t
o
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
d
e
m
a
n
d
u
n
d
e
r
a
n
y
o
f
th
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
.
Mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
W
a
y
P
o
l
i
c
e
a
n
d
F
i
r
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
f
i
n
a
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
f
u
t
u
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
un
d
e
r
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
a
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
re
l
i
a
b
l
e
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
s
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
.
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
W
a
y
P
a
r
k
s
a
n
d
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
t
o
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
ti
e
s
f
o
r
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
f
o
r
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
,
a
n
d
w
i
t
h
i
n
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
.
Re
d
u
c
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
h
r
u
a
d
h
e
r
e
n
c
e
t
o
cr
i
m
e
p
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
(
CP
T
E
D
) d
e
s
i
g
n
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
w
i
t
h
ad
v
a
n
c
e
d
n
o
t
i
c
e
o
f
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
s
a
n
d
an
y
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
c
l
o
s
u
r
e
s
o
r
b
l
o
c
k
a
g
e
s
.
Av
o
i
d
o
r
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
c
l
o
s
u
r
e
s
o
r
b
l
o
c
k
a
g
e
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
a
v
o
i
d
i
m
p
a
c
t
t
o
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
i
m
e
s
.
Cit
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Dr
a
f
t
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
E
I
S
1-
1
3
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
A
c
t
i
o
n
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
So
u
t
h
3
2
0
th
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
o
c
u
s
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
2
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
3
No
A
c
t
i
o
n
3.
6
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Im
p
a
c
t
s
C
o
m
m
o
n
t
o
a
l
l
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
Wa
t
e
r
a
n
d
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
S
e
w
e
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
L
a
k
e
h
a
v
e
n
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
t
a
t
e
s
th
a
t
i
t
h
a
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
o
m
e
s
t
i
c
w
a
t
e
r
a
n
d
s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
u
n
d
e
r
an
y
o
f
t
h
e
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
.
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
a
n
d
2
w
i
l
l
h
a
v
e
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
w
a
t
e
r
d
e
m
a
n
d
a
n
d
s
e
w
e
r
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
r
a
t
e
.
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
i
s
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
t
o
h
a
v
e
sl
i
g
h
t
l
y
l
e
s
s
d
e
m
a
n
d
.
En
e
r
g
y
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
c
ou
l
d
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
d
i
s
r
u
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
,
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
n
e
e
d
t
o
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
l
i
n
e
s
,
a
n
d
o
t
h
er
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
im
p
a
c
t
s
.
Ov
e
r
t
h
e
l
o
n
g
t
e
r
m
,
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
u
n
d
e
r
a
n
y
o
f
t
h
e
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
es
w
i
l
l
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
e
m
a
n
d
f
o
r
e
n
e
r
g
y
,
b
o
t
h
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
n
d
g
a
s
.
Pu
g
e
t
S
o
u
n
d
En
e
r
g
y
(
PS
E
) i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
i
t
h
a
s
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
f
o
r
g
r
o
w
t
h
a
n
d
r
e
p
o
r
t
s
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
c
a
p
a
c
it
y
t
o
s
e
r
v
e
t
h
e
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
d
e
m
a
n
d
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
u
n
d
e
r
a
n
y
o
f
t
h
e
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
.
Te
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
wi
l
l
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
a
n
d
d
e
m
a
n
d
f
o
r
t
e
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
p
r
od
u
c
t
s
.
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
ha
d
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
t
h
e
h
a
v
e
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
d
e
m
a
n
d
.
Mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
En
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
a
l
l
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
c
o
m
p
l
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
l
o
c
a
l
,
s
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
e
n
e
r
g
y
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
.
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
r
o
u
g
h
t
-
t
o
l
e
r
a
n
t
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
(
x
er
i
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
)
f
o
r
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
n
e
w
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
c
i
v
i
c
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
i
n
c
o
rp
o
r
a
t
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
c
o
n
s
e
r
va
t
i
o
n
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
r
e
c
yc
l
i
n
g
,
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
i
r
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 1-14
1.5 Issues to Be Resolved
Adoption of a Planned Action Ordinance and concurrent Zoning Code amendments to
increase the multi-unit residential structure height standard in the City Center Core zone
would support development and re-development of the area to a more intensive mixed-use
character consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan. The key environmental issue
facing decision-makers is the impact of additional traffic on area roadways and mitigating
measures to address such impacts.
1.6 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Air Quality
Temporary, localized dust and odor impacts could occur during the construction activities.
Land Use
No significant unavoidable adverse impacts are anticipated.
Aesthetics, Light and Glare
No significant unavoidable adverse impacts to aesthetics, light and glare are anticipated. The
design standards, guidelines, and mitigating measures described above, together with the
City’s development regulations are adequate to mitigate the significant adverse impacts
anticipated with redevelopment.
Transportation
Although numerous measures will mitigate transportation-related impacts, increases in traffic
congestion at some nodes and/or along some corridors will result in remaining significant,
unavoidable, adverse impacts on the area’s transportation system. Development of the
Federal Way City Center would generate additional traffic volumes on the area’s roadways.
However, the increased intersection capacity and associated traffic improvements would
mitigate undesired impacts. The proposed mixed-use land use pattern, on-site improvements
and public and private transportation demand management (TDM) actions, along with high
levels of existing and future transit service may further reduce vehicle trips thereby further
mitigating impacts.
Public Services
No significant unavoidable adverse impacts to public services are anticipated.
Utilities
No significant unavoidable adverse impacts are anticipated.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 2-1
Chapter 2
Description of the Proposal and Alternatives
2.1 Introduction
This section of the Final EIS repeats the description of the proposal and alternatives, together
with any changes since issuance of the Draft EIS. Text that has been inserted or deleted since
the Draft EIS is shown in cross-out or underline format.
Overview of the Proposed Action
The action proposed by the City of Federal Way consists of the following related actions:
1. Adoption of an ordinance designating a portion of the City Center sub-area (see Figure 1)
as a planned action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.031(2)(a) and WAC 197-11-164. The planned
action designation would apply to construction of proposed residential, retail, office,
hotel, civic and structured parking development falling within the development envelope
and project area analyzed in this EIS. The total development envelope analyzed in this
EIS is summarized in Table 2-1. The project area is shown in Figure 1.
Table 2-1. Planned Action Development Envelope
Uses Development Envelope
Retail 750,000 sf
Office 350,000 sf
Lodging 600 rooms
Residential 750 units
Civic 100,000 sf
Structured Parking 750 stalls
Source: City of Federal Way, 2003
The planned action designation would is anticipated to apply to development that occurs
through 2014. The City will periodically assess the rate of actual development that
results from the planned action designation and associated environmental conditions.
Based on this assessment, the City may determine to extend, maintain, or subtract from
the effective lifespan of the planned action designation.
Prepared by:
Federal Way
Planned Action EIS Figure 1:
City Center Sub Area
Lake Dolloff
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 2-3
This action may also include procedural text amendments to the Federal Way Municipal
Code (FWMC) Chapter 22 (Zoning Code) to recognize the Planned Action designation
and process. These changes are not expected to have an environmental impact and are
not discussed further in this EIS.
Although the planned action designation would not apply to individual development
proposals outside of the development envelope or project area, the environmental
analysis conducted in this EIS could be used to help achieve SEPA compliance for such
proposals.
WAC 197-11-600 provides the criteria and procedure for use of existing environmental
documents for SEPA compliance.
2. Adoption of a new structure height standard for multi-unit housing in the City Center
Core (CC-C) zoning designation in the City Center sub-area, including area outside of the
planned action project area (see Figure 2). The new height standard would be 200 feet
under Alternative 1 and 145 feet under Alternative 2. These alternative height scenarios
have been included with the alternatives for the purpose of analysis in this EIS. They are
not dependent on either alternative and the City may adopt either height standard
regardless of any decisions related to the planned action designation.
Background
The City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan lays out a long-range vision for the future of
Federal Way. The Plan includes nine elements: Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Capital
Facilities, and Private Utilities; Economic Development; Natural Environment; Potential
Annexation Areas; and City Center.
Chapter 7 of the Comprehensive Plan addresses the City Center sub-area. City Center
contains approximately 414 acres and is bound by South 312th Street, South 324th Street,
Interstate 5, 11th Place South and 13th Avenue South (see Figure 1). As described in the
Comprehensive Plan, City Center is characterized by:
Typical suburban strip retail and mall development;
Large areas of surface parking around the retail development;
Disjointed and over-sized block grid network;
Lack of consistent pedestrian improvements; and
Little residential population.
Prepared by:
Federal Way
Planned Action EIS Figure 2:
City Center Zoning
Designations
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 2-5
The future vision for City Center states, “By the end of the comprehensive planning horizon,
the Federal Way City Center will have evolved into the cultural, social, and economic center
of the City and fulfilled its role as one of Puget Sound’s regional network of urban centers.
This role will be reinforced by pedestrian-oriented streetscapes; an efficient multi-modal
transportation system; livable and affordable housing; increased retail, service, and office
development in a compact area; a network of public spaces and parks, superior urban design;
and a safe, essential and vibrant street life.” Figure 3 illustrates potential development
consistent with this vision that could occur in a portion of City Center.
In support of this vision, the principal purposes of the City Center chapter are to:
Create an identifiable downtown that is the social and economic focus of the City;
Strengthen the City as a whole by providing for long-term growth in employment and
housing;
Promote housing opportunities close to employment;
Support development of an extensive regional transit system;
Reduce dependency on automobiles;
Consume less land with urban development;
Maximize the benefit of public investment in infrastructure and services;
Reduce costs of and time required for permitting;
Provide a central gathering place for the community; and
Improve the quality of urban design for all developments.
The City Center chapter contains a number of policies intended to help achieve these goals.
City Center Policy CCP5 specifically addresses the intent to prepare a Planned Action EIS for
the City Center area. The policy states that the City should “[c]omplete an area-wide
environmental impact statement and SEPA Planned Action and provide streamlined permit
review in the City Center to accelerate changes to the core area.”
This proposal is intended to support the principal purposes of the City Center Chapter and to
specifically implement Policy CCP5.
Objectives of the Proposal
The Proposed Action is intended to achieve the following objectives:
Support the principal objectives of the City Center Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan,
particularly those that promote a more intensive urban style of development in the City
Center and the reduction in costs and time required for permitting.
Fulfill the direction of City Center Element Policy CCP5.
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
:
Fe
d
e
r
a
l
W
a
y
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
Ac
t
i
o
n
E
I
S
Fi
g
u
r
e
3
:
Re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
n
c
e
p
t
s
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 2-7
Provide an incentive to development proposals that are consistent with the overall intent
of the City Center vision.
Provide greater certainty to potential developers, city decision-makers and the general
public regarding the future development pattern and likely impacts of future development
in the City Center area.
2.2 Planning Process
Growth Management Act
The Growth Management Act (GMA), adopted by the 1990 Washington State Legislature
and amended periodically thereafter, contains a comprehensive framework for managing
growth and development within local jurisdictions. Many of the provisions of the GMA
apply to the state’s largest and fastest growing jurisdictions, including King County and all
cities within the county. Additionally, some provisions, such as requirements to identify and
regulate critical areas, apply to all local jurisdictions.
Comprehensive plans for cities planning under GMA must include a land use element
(including a future land use map), housing element, transportation element, public facilities
element, and utilities element. Additional elements may be added at the local jurisdiction’s
option. The GMA plan must provide for adequate capacity to accommodate the city’s share
of projected regional growth. The plan must also ensure that planned and financed
infrastructure can support planned growth at a locally acceptable level of service.
As required by the GMA, the City of Federal Way has prepared and adopted a local
comprehensive plan to guide future development and fulfill the City’s responsibilities under
GMA.
City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan
The City’s Comprehensive Plan was prepared in accordance with the GMA and underwent an
extensive public participation process that included City residents, property owners, and
business owners as documented in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Introduction. The
Comprehensive Plan in its entirety contains nine elements: Land Use, Transportation,
Economic Development, Housing, Capital Facilities, City Center, Potential Annexation Area,
Natural Environment, and Private Utilities.
The GMA requires the plan to be updated no more than once a year except under special
circumstances. The GMA also requires a review and update of the plan every ten years. In
compliance with these requirements, the City of Federal Way has annually updated the
Comprehensive Plan.
Development Regulations
Zoning Requirements
Zoning designations in City Center are the City Center Core (CC-C) and City Center Frame
(CC-F). The CC-C designation is intended to provide for a concentration of growth into a
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 2-8
high-density, mixed-use center for Federal Way. The CC-F designation provides for
medium-density mixed-use development in the area surrounding the CC-C designation and
extending to the boundary of the City Center sub-area. The CC-F zone allows for similar
uses to the CC-C zone, but at a lower density and intensity. The development standards in
the CC-F designation are intended to allow a compatible transition to the surrounding area.
Article X1, Chapter 22 of the Federal Way City Code establishes the district regulations for
the zoning designations in the City. Division 8 establishes the uses and development
standards for development in the CC-C and CC-F zones. Permitted uses in the CC-C and CC-
F zones include office, retail, entertainment, hotel, convention and trade centers, multi-unit
housing, and a variety of public uses.
Division 8 also establishes required review processes, lot size, required yards, structure height
and required parking. Requirements related to building height are described below.
Height of Structure – In the CC-C zone, permitted building heights vary depending on the
use. Office and hotel uses are permitted a base height of 95 feet, retail and multi-unit
residential uses to a base height of 70 feet. In all cases, heights are allowed to increase
subject to special regulations. Office and hotel uses may increase to 145 feet; retail uses to
95 feet; and multi-unit residential uses to 85 feet.
In the CC-F zone, the base height limit for office and retail structures is 35 feet, with potential
increased building height allowed on a case-by-case basis. Base height limit for multi-unit
residential uses is 70 feet to a maximum of 85 feet subject to special regulations for this use.
and fFor hotel uses, the base height is 45 feet. An increased structure height may be allowed
for all uses on a case-by-case basis.
Community Design Guidelines
Article XIX, Chapter 22, of the Federal Way City Code establishes Community Design
Guidelines applicable to all zones in the City and to all development applications except
single family residential. New development proposals in the planned action project area
would be subject to the Community Design Guidelines and review process.
As described in Section 22-1630, the purpose of the Community Design Guidelines are to
establish minimum design standards to protect property values and enhance the general
appearance of the city; increase flexibility and encourage creativity in building and site
design; achieve predictability in design review; improve and expand pedestrian amenities;
and implement Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles.
Proposals subject to community design guidelines are processed as a component of the
underlying land use process. The director of community development services has the
authority to approve, modify, or deny proposals under this process.
Site design guidelines (Section 22-1634) address general site criteria, parking (surface lots
and structured parking), pedestrian circulation and public spaces, landscaping, commercial
service and institutional facilities and other site elements. Guidelines for building design
(Section 22-1635) address general building criteria, landscape screening, and building
articulation and scale. Additional guidelines are provided for building and pedestrian
orientation and mixed-use residential buildings. Section 22-1638(c) provides specific
guidelines for the City Center Core and Frame zones. Guidelines in this section address
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 2-9
parking (surface and structured parking), entrance and building facades, and the location of
drive-through facilities.
2.3 Planned Action Process
Planned Action Overview
According to WAC 197-11-164, a Planned Action is defined as a project that: is designated a
planned action by ordinance; has had the significant environmental impacts addressed in an
EIS; has been prepared in conjunction with a comprehensive plan or subarea plan; is located
within an urban growth area; is not an essential public facility; and is consistent with an
adopted comprehensive plan.
The City proposes to designate the City Center project area (Figure 1) as a planned action,
pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and implementing rules. As shown
in Figure 1, the project area is bounded on the south by South 324th Street; on the north by
South 312th Street; on the west by Pacific Highway South; and on the east by 23rd Avenue
South. Federal Way will follow applicable procedures, described generally below, to review
proposed projects within the project area through the land use review process associated with
each project to determine their impacts and impose any appropriate development conditions.
Planned Action EIS
The significant environmental impacts of projects designated as Planned Actions must be
identified and adequately analyzed in an EIS (WAC 197-11-164). Planned Action projects
should only be designated when a city can reasonably analyze the site-specific impacts that
would occur as a result of the types of projects designated.
Planned Action Ordinance
According to WAC 197-11-168, the ordinance designating the Planned Action shall include
the following:
1. A description of the type of project action being designated as a Planned Action;
2. A finding that the probable significant environmental impacts of the Planned Action have
been identified and adequately addressed in an EIS;
3. Identification of mitigation measures that must be applied to a project for it to qualify as a
Planned Action.
Following the completion of the EIS process, the City of Federal Way would designate the
Planned Action by ordinance. The ordinance would identify mitigation, as described in this
EIS, which would be applicable to future site-specific development actions. Mitigation could
include requirements that would apply to all development in the planned action area as well
as measures that may apply on a case-by-case basis.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 2-10
2.4 Environmental Review
Comprehensive Plan EIS
The City of Federal Way completed an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the City’s
GMA Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations in 1995. The Comprehensive Plan
EIS considered impacts associated with the proposed land use pattern, including land use in
the proposed City Center sub-area (Comprehensive Plan Chapter 7). Elements of the
environment that were considered in the Comprehensive Plan EIS include earth; air quality;
water resources; plants and animals; energy; environmental health; land & shoreline use;
aesthetics, light and glare; transportation; public services and utilities. This Planned Action
EIS incorporates by reference the analysis contained in the 1995 Comprehensive Plan EIS as
it relates to the City Center sub-area.
Scope of Review
Pursuant to SEPA Rules (WAC 197-11-408 through 410), a Determination of Significance
was issued by the City of Federal Way on September 3, 2003. Interested citizens, agencies,
organizations, and affected tribes were invited to submit comments on the scope of the EIS.
The scoping process included one public meeting, held on September 17, 2003. This meeting
provided information about the EIS process, the proposal and alternatives, a SEPA
Environmental Checklist on the proposal (DEIS Appendix 3) and an opportunity to comment
on the proposed scope of the environmental review. No comments were received on the
scope of the EIS.
The Draft EIS addressed the following elements of the environment:
Land Use – The land use analysis includes an evaluation of the amount, types, scale and
pattern of uses. The focus of the analysis is on land use compatibility with existing and
planned development within and adjacent to the project area.
Transportation – The transportation analysis identifies and evaluates potential impacts
to morning/evening peak hour traffic and Saturday traffic in and around the project area.
The period through 2009 is analyzed in detail, with a more generalized analysis for the
period between 2010 and 2014.
Aesthetics – The aesthetics discussion includes a narrative evaluation of the design and
character of existing buildings and the nature of change to the urban character that may
result from the proposal and alternatives.
Public Services – The public services analysis reviews police, fire and emergency
medical services, parks and recreation, and energy and communication. Existing levels
of service, estimated needs and demand for services, and measures needed, if any, to
respond to projected demand from the proposal and alternatives are described.
Utilities – The utilities analysis focuses on water and sewer service. Existing capacity,
constraints, planned improvements are described and compared to future demand for
water and sewer service resulting from the proposal and alternatives.
Air Quality – Air quality analysis focuses on potential air quality impacts resulting from
increased traffic associated with the proposal and alternatives.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 2-11
2.5 Proposed Action and Alternatives
Overview
This EIS evaluates three alternative land use scenarios for the City Center project area. These
different scenarios are intended to allow the City to test the impacts of two different growth
patterns and to bracket the range of growth that is likely to occur within the project area. If
adopted, the planned action designation would based on the total development envelope
described in Table 2-1. Adoption of a specific action alternative is not necessary for
implementation of the proposal.
For the purpose of analysis and discussion in this EIS, the planned action project area has
been divided into three smaller analysis areas, referred to in the EIS as Block 1, Block 2 and
Block 3. Block 1 consists of the northern portion of the project area and is bounded on the
north by S 312th Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, on the south by South 316th
Street and on the east by 23rd Avenue S. Block 2 is located in the central portion of the
project area and is bounded on the north by S 316th Street, on the west by Pacific Highway
South, on the south by S 320th Street and on the east by 23rd Avenue S. Block 3 is located in
the southern portion of the project area and consists mainly of The Commons at Federal Way.
Block 3 is bounded on the north by S 320th Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, on
the south by S 324th Street and on the east by 23rd Avenue S. Please refer to Figure 4.
Alternatives 1 and 2 assume the maximum development identified in Table 2-1, but distribute
growth differently. Alternative 1 assumes that growth is focused around South 320th Street,
with over 85 percent of new growth occurring in Blocks 2 and 3. Alternative 2 distributes
future growth more evenly around the project area. As noted above, these alternatives are
intended to allow comparison of different growth scenarios and to bracket the amount of
likely future growth within the project area. Future adoption of a planned action designation,
however, would be based on the total development envelope described in Table 2-1, rather
than the specific growth patterns described for alternatives 1 and 2. Alternative 3 (No Action)
assumes the level and distribution of growth established in the Comprehensive Plan. Figure 5
shows the relative distribution and amount of total growth assumed under each of the three
alternatives.
Prepared by:
Federal Way
Planned Action EIS Figure 4:
City Center Analysis
Blocks
Prepared by:
Federal Way
Planned Action EIS Figure 5:
Overview of Alternatives
Land UseBlock 1Block 2Block 3Total
Retail112,500337,500300,000750,000
Office62,500187,500100,000350,000
Hotel 100 rooms300 rooms200 rooms600 rooms
Residential125 units375 units250 units750 units
Civic Uses050,000 sf50,000 sf100,000 sf
Structured
Parking
0250 spaces500 spaces750 spaces
Land UseBlock 1Block 2Block 3Total
Retail255,000 sf255,000 sf240,000 sf750,000 sf
Office135,000 sf135,000 sf80,000 sf350,000 sf
Hotel220 rooms220 rooms160 rooms600 rooms
Residential275 units275 units200 units750 units
Civic Uses50,000 sf50,000 sf0100,000 sf
Structured
Parking
175 spaces175 spaces400 spaces750 spaces
Alternative 1: South 320th Street Focus
Alternative 2: Distributed Development
Alternative 3: No Action Alternative
Total Development
Block 1
12%
Block 3
47%
Block 2
41%
Total Development
Block 2
35%
Block 3
30%
Block 1
35%
Total Development
Block 2
36%
Block 1
32%Block 3
32%
Land UseBlock 1Block 2Block 3Total
Retail68,790 sf83,400 sf68,080 sf 220,270 sq
Office48,476 sf39,970 sf16,000 sf104,446 sf
Residential70 units100 units100 units270 units
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 2-14
The alternatives also include different assumptions regarding maximum structure height in
the City Center-Core and City Center-Frame zones. As noted previously, these alternative
height scenarios are associated with different alternatives for the purpose of analysis in this
EIS. They are not dependent on either alternative and the City may adopted either height
standard regardless of any decisions related to the planned action designation. Under
Alternative 3 (No Action) the existing structure height standards would continue unchanged.
Alternative 1
Land Use Pattern. The proposed land use pattern would create a dense, mixed-use urban
neighborhood focused around South 320th Street, with development focused in Blocks 2 and
3. The total amount of new development anticipated for the City Center area is as described
in Table 2-1 and Figure 5. The new development would be distributed over time and
throughout the project area as shown in Tables 2-2 and 2-3.
Table 2-2. Alternative 1 (South 320th Street Focus)
Development through 2009
Blocks
1 2 3 Total
Retail (sf) 67,500 202,500 180,000 450,000
Office (sf) 37,500 112,500 60,000 210,000
Lodging (rooms) 60 180 120 360
Residential (units) 75 225 150 450
Civic (sf) 0 0 0 0
Structured Parking (stalls) 0 150 300 450
Source: City of Federal Way, Jones & Stokes, 2003
Table 2-3. Alternative 1 (South 320th Street Focus)
2010 - 2014
Blocks
1 2 3 Total
Retail (sf) 45,000 135,000 120,000 300,000
Office (sf) 25,000 75,000 40,000 140,000
Lodging (rooms) 40 120 80 240
Residential (units) 50 150 100 300
Civic (sf) 0 50,000 50,000 100,000
Structured Parking (stalls) 0 100 200 300
Source: City of Federal Way, Jones & Stokes, 2003
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 2-15
Under this Alternative, approximately 47 percent of new growth would be located at The
Commons at Federal Way site (Block 3). Approximately 41 percent would occur in Block 2
and the remainder (12%) in Block 1.
Development Regulations. Alternative 1 would amend FWMC Division 8, Section 22-797
to allow a maximum structure height for multi-unit housing of 200 feet. The current height
standard is 70 feet or 85 feet.
Alternative 2
Land Use Pattern. Similar to Alternative 1, the proposed land use pattern would create a
dense, mixed-use urban neighborhood in the project area. In contrast to Alternative 1,
Alternative 2 would distribute growth relatively more evenly throughout the project area.
Relatively more growth is allocated to Block 1 and relatively less to Blocks 2 and 3. The
total amount of new development anticipated for the City Center area is as described in
Table 2-1 and Figure 5 and would be distributed over time and throughout the project area as
shown in Tables 2-4 and 2-5.
Table 2-4. Alternative 2 (Distributed Development)
Development through 2009
Blocks
1 2 3 Total
Retail (sf) 153,000 153,000 144,000 450,000
Office (sf) 81,000 81,000 48,000 210,000
Lodging (rooms) 132 132 96 360
Residential (units) 165 165 120 450
Civic (sf) 0 0 0 0
Structured Parking (stalls) 175 0 240 415
Source: City of Federal Way, Jones & Stokes, 2003
Table 2-5. Alternative 2 (Distributed Development)
2010 – 2014
Blocks
1 2 3 Total
Retail (sf) 102,000 102,000 96,000 300,000
Office (sf) 54,000 54,000 32,000 140,000
Lodging (rooms) 88 88 64 240
Residential (units) 110 110 80 300
Civic (sf) 50,000 50,000 0 100,000
Structured Parking (stalls) 0 175 160 335
Source: City of Federal Way, Jones & Stokes, 2003
Under this Alternative, approximately 30 percent of new growth would be located at The
Commons at Federal Way site (Block 3). Remaining development potential would be spread
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 2-16
between Blocks 1 and 2, which each area accommodating approximately 35 percent of the
new growth anticipated under the planned action.
Development Regulations. Alternative 2 would amend FWMC Division 8, Section 22-797
to allow a maximum structure height for multi-unit housing of 145 feet. The current height
standard is 70 feet or 85 feet.
Alternative 3
Land Use Pattern. As described in the Comprehensive Plan, the land use pattern in the City
Center project area would be characterized by an intensively developed urban core that
includes mixed use, office, retail and residential development. Greatest intensity of
development would occur in the City Center Core area, with development transitioning in the
City Center Frame to the surrounding area. Overall, anticipated growth under this alternative
would be approximately 32 percent of that anticipated for office and retail development and
36 percent of that anticipated for residential development under the action alternatives.
Tables 2-6 and 2-7 below show the projected growth by Block area and time period.
Table 2-6. Alternative 3 (No Action)
Development through 2009
Blocks
1 2 3 Total
Retail (sf) 41,270 50,040 40,850 132,160
Office (sf) 29,086 23,980 9,600 62,666
Residential (units) 40 60 60 160
Source: City of Federal Way, Jones & Stokes, 2003
Table 2-7. Alternative 3 (No Action)
2010–2014
Blocks
1 2 3 Total
Retail (sf) 27,520 33,360 27,230 88,110
Office (sf) 19,390 15,990 6,400 41,780
Residential (units) 30 40 40 110
Source: City of Federal Way, Jones & Stokes, 2003
Under this Alternative, approximately 32 percent of the new growth would be located at The
Commons at Federal Way site (Block 3). Approximately 36% would be located in Block 2,
with the remainder (32%) in Block 1
Development Regulations. Under the No Action Alternative, existing development
standards would continue unchanged. Development standards for structure height would not
be amended.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 2-17
2.6 Benefits and Disadvantages of Delaying Proposed
Action
The Proposed Action includes adoption of a Planned Action Ordinance for future
development in the City Center sub-area and adoption of increased structure height standards
for multi-family residential development in the City Center – Core and Frame zones.
Delaying implementation of the Proposed Action would delay the potential impacts identified
in this EIS, including potential land use conflicts, changes to visual character, increased
traffic congestion and increased demand for public services and utilities. This delay could be
considered environmentally beneficial in the short-term. Conversely, Ddeferring
implementation would also delay and reduce the likelihood that the City Center sub-area will
develop in a manner consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan. Delay would not
allow new development and associated review processes to benefit from the analysis
developed through this Planned Action process.
2.7 Major Issues to be Resolved
Adoption of a Planned Action Ordinance and concurrent Zoning Code amendments to allow
increased structure heights in the City Center Core and Frame zones would support
development and re-development of the area to a more intensive mixed-use character
consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan. The key environmental issue facing
decision-makers is the impact of additional traffic on area roadways and mitigating measures
to address such impacts.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 3-1
Chapter 3
Errata
This Chapter includes Draft EIS clarifications or corrections based on responses to comments
presented in Chapter 4 of this Final EIS or based on City staff review of the DEIS
information. The clarifications or corrections are organized in the same order as the DEIS
sections and by page numbers. Text that has been inserted or deleted since the Draft EIS is
shown in cross-out underline format.
3.1 Revisions to DEIS Air Quality Analysis
DEIS Page 3-2, revision to Table 3-1
Table 3-1 is amended as follows:
Table 3-1. National and State of Washington Ambient Air Quality Standards
National (EPA)
Pollutant Primary Secondary Washington State
Carbon Monoxide (CO)
8-hour average
1-hour average
9 ppm
35 ppm
9 ppm
35 ppm
9 ppm
35 ppm
Particulate Matter (PM xx)
PM10
Annual average
24-hour average
50 µg/m3
150 µg/m3
50 µg/m3
150 µg/m3
50 µg/m3
150 µg/m3
PM2.5
Annual average
24-hour average
15 µg/m3
65 µg/m3
15 µg/m3
65 µg/m3
15 µg/m3
65 µg/m3
Lead
Quarterly average 1.5 µg/m3 1.5 µg/m3 1.5 µg/m3
Sulfur Dioxide
Annual average
24-hour average
3-hour average
1-hour average
0.03 ppm
0.14 ppm
No standard
No standard
No standard
No standard
0.50 ppm
No standard
0.02 ppm
0.10 ppm
No standard
0.40 ppma
Ozone
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 3-2
National (EPA)
Pollutant Primary Secondary Washington State
8-hour averageb 0.08 ppm 0.08 ppm 0.08 ppm
Nitrogen Dioxide
Annual average 0.05 ppm 0.05 ppm 0.05 ppm
Source: Jones & Stokes, 2005
Notes: Annual standards never to be exceeded. Short-term standards not to be exceeded more than once per year
unless noted.
ppm = parts per million
PM10 = particles 10 microns or less in size
PM2.5 = particles 2.5 microns or less in size
µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
a 0.25 ppm not to be exceeded more than two times in 7 consecutive days.
b Not to be exceeded on more than 1 day per calendar year as determined under the conditions indicated in
Chapter 173-475 WAC.
Revision to DEIS Page 3-3
Federally funded transportation projects proposed for construction within nonattainment areas
or maintenance areas are subject to the Transportation Conformity regulations specified under
the Clean Air Washington Act.
Revision to DEIS Page 3-6
Conduct a project-level carbon monoxideCO "hot spot" analysis to model the worst-case
concentrations adjacent to the roadway, and compare the modeled concentrations to the
allowable ambient air quality standards.
3.2 Revisions to DEIS Land Use Analysis
Revisions to DEIS page 3-12 through 3-14
Vacant and Redevelopable Land
Vacant Land
Based on a review of the project area and King County Assessor's data, approximately 5 3.5
acres are vacant in Block 1 and 3 acres in Block 2, for a total of approximately 8 6.5 acres of
vacant land. See Figure 7 for the location of these parcels.
Redevelopable Land
Based on King County Assessor’s data, potential for lot aggregation and local knowledge of
the project area, the project area has a total of approximately 8.1521.24 acres of vacant and
redevelopable land have been identified in Block 1; 8.978.19 acres in Block 2; and 0.65 acres
in Block 3, for a total of 17.730.08 acres of vacant and redevelopable land in the Project area
(see Table 3-6).
Prepared by:
Federal Way
Planned Action EIS Figure 7:
Vacant and
Redevelopable Land
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 3-4
Table 3-6. Vacant and Redevelopable Land Summary
Vacant Land1 Redevelopable Land2 TOTAL
Block 1 5.353.48 acres 2.8017.76 acres 8.1521.24 acres
Block 2 2.922.21 acres 6.055.98 acres 8.978.19 acres
Block 3 0 acres 0.65 acres 0.65 acres
TOTAL 6.75.69 acres 5.0824.39 acres 17.730.08 acres
Source: Jones & Stokes, 2006.
1. Based on King County Assessor’s data, 2006.
2. King County Buildable Lands Report methodology; using 2006 King County Assessor’s data, adjusted based on
City of Federal Way local knowledge of the project area
Existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations
As shown on Figure 38, the project area is currently designated City Center Core (CC-C)
from S. 324th Street to S. 316th Street. From S. 316th to S. 312th the area is designated City
Center Frame (CC-F).
Revision to DEIS page 3-15
Existing Zoning Code Designations
As shown in Figure 32, the area is currently zoned City Center Core (CC-C) from S. 324th
Street to S. 316th Street. From S. 316th to S. 312th the area is zoned City Center Frame (CC-
F). Tables 3-7 and 3-8 identify the major permitted uses and standards provided for in each
zone.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 3-5
Revision to DEIS page 3-17
Table 3-7. City Center Core Permitted Uses and Development Standards
Permitted Uses Maximum Building Height Minimum Parking Requirement1
Office 95’ above average building elevation
to a maximum of 145' subject to
special regulations for this use.
1 stall/300 sf
Retail, including regional retail
shopping center
70’ above average building elevation
to a maximum of 95' subject to
special regulations for this use.
1 stall/300 sf
Hotel/Convention/Trade
Centers
95’ above average building elevation
to a maximum of 145' subject to
special regulations for this use.
1 stall/guest room; convention/trade
center case by case
Entertainment 70’ above average building elevation
to a maximum of 95’ subject to
special regulations for this use.
1 space/200 gsf for private clubs and
lodges; all other uses 100 space/100
gsf
Parking garage 45 feet above average building
elevation
case by case
Multi-Unit Housing 70’ above average building elevation
to a maximum of 85’ subject to
special regulations for this use.
1.7 stalls/unit
Hospital/Nursing Home 35 feet above average building
elevation
case by case
Government Facility 75 feet above average building
elevation
case by case
Public Utility 35 feet above average building
elevation
case by case
Schools 35 feet above average, with gym up
to 55' if beyond 100' from residential
zone.
case by case
Personal Wireless Service
Facility
Not specified; subject to Zoning
Code Section 22-967.
Not applicable
Source: City of Federal Way, 2006.
1. Parking requirement may be established through a project-specific analysis, subject to approval by the Directors
of the Community Development Services and Public Works Departments.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 3-6
Revision to DEIS page 3-18
Table 3-8. City Center Frame Permitted Uses and Development Standards
Permitted Uses Maximum Building Height Minimum Parking Requirement1
Office 35’ above average building elevation 1 stall/300 sf
Retail 35’ above average building elevation 1 stall/300 sf
Hotel/Convention/Trade
Centers
45’ above average building elevation 1 stall/guest room convention/trade
center case by case
Entertainment 60’ above average building elevation 1 space/200 gsf for private clubs and
lodges, all other uses 100 space/100
gsf
Vehicle Service Station 35’ above average building elevation case by case
Multi-Unit Housing 70’ above average building elevation
to a maximum of 85’ subject to special
regulations for this use.
1.7 stalls/unit
Group Homes/Transition
Housing
35’above average building elevation. case by case
Schools, Day Care
Facilities, Churches
35’; gyms to 55’ if located more than
100 feet from adjacent residential
zone.
case by case
Hospital facilities 35’ above average building elevation case-by case
Source: City of Federal Way, 2006
1. Parking requirement may be established through a project-specific analysis, subject to approval by the Directors
of the Community Development Services and Public Works Departments.
As shown in Figure 32, zoning designations in the surrounding area also correspond to
comprehensive plan land use designations. Zoning designations include:
Community Business (BC) – BC allows general retail uses and is located along Pacific
Highway South, to the north and south of the City Center sub-area.
RM 1800 – This multi-family zoning designation allows multi-family development to a
maximum density of 24 units per acre. This designation is found north of the project
area.
RS 7.2 – The single-family designation allows a density of six units per acre and is the
primary zoning designation for the single-family area surrounding the City Center sub-
area. In addition, Steel Lake Park and Celebration Park are both zoned RS 7.2.
RM 2400, RM 3600 – These multi-family designations allow maximum densities of 18
and 12 units per acre, respectively. These designations are found in the area south of The
Commons at Federal Way. An area of RM 2400 zoning is also found to the east of the
northern CC-F zoning district.
Prepared by:
Federal Way
Planned Action EIS Figure 8:
Comprehensive Plan
Designations
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 3-8
Revisions to DEIS page 3-20
The two largest employers in the surrounding area include Weyerhaeuser and the Federal
Way School District, with 3,586 and 2,885 employees, respectively (Federal Way Chamber
of Commerce). Other large employers in the area with approximately 500-600 employees
each include World Vision, the U.S. Post Office, and St Francis Hospital. The City of
Federal Way is also a major employer in the vicinity of the project area, with 306 employees.
Alternative 1
As shown in Table 3-11, dDevelopment through 2009 under Alternative 1 would introduce a
total of 450,000 sf of new retail space, 210,000 sf of office space, 360 hotel rooms, 450
residential units, and 450 structured parking stalls.
Revisions to DEIS page 3-22
Alternative 2
The proposed increase to 145 feet’ for multi-unit structures would be equal to the current
height limit for office and hotel structures in the CC-C zone and comparable to the height
standard for other uses in this zone.
Impacts Common to All Alternatives
The potential for such conflict will increase with greater diversity and mix of uses in the
project area.
3.3 Revisions to DEIS Aesthetics, Light and Glare Analysis
Revision to DEIS page 3-27
The Commons at Federal Way is the commercial anchor in the project area. The Mall is
principally oriented toward S 320th Street, with surface parking area located between the
primary building and the street (see Figure 12). Development consists of the primary mall
facility and includes one outbuildings, located in the northeast corner of the parking area.
The property is bounded along the west side by a utility easement that generally parallels
South 324th Street and contains high voltage transmission lines and utility towers.
Revision to DEIS page 3-32
Example Development Area 2: Northwest quadrant of the intersection of 20th
Avenue S/S 316th Street
This development area is currently vacantbeing developed by a single-story restaurant. Major
retail uses surrounding this development area include Top Foods to the west, Walmart to the
north and the former Toys R Us building to the east.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 3-9
Example Development Area 4: West of 23rd Avenue South, at approximately
S 319th Place
Development in this area includes the SeaTac Plaza, a single-story commercial complex
consisting of approximately 107,400 square feet and 234,000 square feet of surface parking.
The future Sound Federal WayTransit Center is planned forlocated on the property north of
the SeaTac Plaza.
Example Development Area 6: Southeast corner of The Commons at Federal
Way site
This area is located in the southeast corner of The Commons at Federal Way parking lot.
Development in this area consists of a paved parking area, bounded along the southern edge
by the power transmission towers and power lines. Development to the east, across 23rd
Avenue South consists of a small retail stripsstrip-, located above the street, behind a concrete
retaining structure.
Revision to DEIS page 3-39
Views
Development of high and mid-rise buildings in the project area could result in improved
views to Mount Rainier for these uses; but could also result in decreased views for the
remaining low-rise buildings located near these sites and from public rights-of-ways.
3.4 Revisions to DEIS Transportation Analysis
Revision to DEIS page 3-52
Transit Services
Federal Way is served by a number of transit providers including King County Metro, Pierce
County Transit, and Sound Transit. In the vicinity of the project area, there is frequent transit
service with 23 routes serving the area during weekday hours with service as frequent four
times per hour. Midday and Weekend service levels are lower.
The Transit Center serves the freeway-oriented bus routes King County Metro Routes 177,
194, and 197; and Sound Transit Routes 565, 574 and 577. Other transit routes at the Transit
Center include King County Metro Routes 173 (starting in Sptember 2006), 174, 181, 182,
183,187, 545,574, 577, 901, 903 and Pierce Transit Routes 402, 500 and 501.
The other major transit facility within the project area vicinity is the Federal Way/S 320th St
Park and Ride facility at 23rd Ave S & S 323rd Street. Routes 173, 174, 177, 194 and 196
serve the park and ride facility. Route 173 will relocate to the Transit Center in September
2006.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 3-10
Revision to DEIS page 3-57
Parking Requirements
Table 3-23 describes the increase in parking requirement for the Alternative 1 above existing
levels. These increases assume full development by the year 2014. The parking requirements
estimate the number of spaces required for the proposed mix of uses assumed for Alternative
1 and is identical for Alternatives 1 and 2. Compared with Alternative 3, 4,0014,334
additional spaces would be required under the City’s parking code. These spaces may be
provided on the site or as part of parking structures assumed as part of future development.
The actual parking requirement for an individual development may be reduced through
shared parking arrangements or transportation demand management programs. This
reduction could vary from 10% to 20%.
Table 3-23. Alternative 1 and 2 Parking Requirement
Land Use
Parking Code
Requirement
Proposed
Development1
Required
Parking2
Increase over
Alternative 3
Civic Uses4 Case by case4 1000,000 sf Unknown333
stalls
Unknown333
stalls
Hotel 1 per room 600 rooms 600 stalls 600 stalls
Office 1 per 300 sf 350,000 sf 1,167 stalls 819 stalls
Other3 1 per 1000 sf 0 sf 0 stalls 0 stalls
Residential 1.7 per unit 750 units 1,275 stalls 816 stalls
Retail 1 per 300 sf 750,000 sf 2,500 stalls 1,766 stalls
Total 5,542 5875 stalls 4,0014334 stalls
Source: Jones and Stokes Associates, 2005.
1. Assumes 2014 full build-out of planned action development envelope; please see Chapter 2.
2. These parking demands may be 10% to 20% less based on shared parking.
3. 3. Category includes such uses as wholesale, storage, light manufacturing and other similar uses.
4. Civic uses cover a wide range of potential uses, including libraries, cultural centers, community centers and
others. For the purpose of this table, a parking ratio of 300 spaces/1000 square feet of building area is
assumed. Actual parking requirement will depend on the type of use that is proposed.
Revision to DEIS page 3-69
The final mitigation improvements for the planned action would be reviewed and adopted by
City Council. As identified in this study, Alternatives 1 and 2 would require no additional
mitigation over actions needed for the No Action alternative. The No Action mitigation
would be approximately $2.1 million. Planned action development projects may be required
to fund a proportional share of the No Action Alternativethese improvements.
Saturday Peak Hour
Table 3-29 lists the potential Saturday peak hour mitigation improvements. As identified in
this study, the Saturday peak hour analysis assumes the completion of the PM peak hour
improvements indicated in Table 3-28.
A substantial amount of the Saturday mitigation would be requiredis identified for the No
Action alternative. Two options are provided for construction of the northbound right turn
lane at S. 320th Street and 20th Avenue S intersection. The first option relocates a proposed
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 3-11
sidewalk to the west of a future but permitted building, eliminating the need for a full
building take. The second option purchases the building and constructs the sidewalk within
the roadway right-of-way. The difference between the two options is estimated at $2.6
million. The range of costs for the identified mitigation under the No Action alternative
would be approximately $2.5 million to $5.2 million. Additional Saturday peak hour
mitigation has been identified for Alternatives 1 and 2 would requirewith an estimated cost of
$3.2 million of additional improvements amounting to a total (including Alternative 3) of
approximately $5.7-$8.4 million. The Federal Way City Council will make a determination
as to whether to require mitigation for Saturday peak hour congestion as part of their review
and action on the proposed Planned Action designation and ordinance.
Revision to DEIS page 3-70 through 3-71
Table 3-30. Intersection Operations by Peak Hour with Mitigation (2009)
Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 2
PM Peak Mitigated Mitigated Mitigated
Intersection LOS v/c LOS v/c LOS v/c
S 272 St & Pacific Hwy
S1 F 1.102 F 1.092 F 1.092
S 272 St & I-5
southbound Ramp1 F 1.022* F 1.002 F 1.002
S 272 St & Military Rd S4 F 1.242 F 1.222 F 1.222
S 312 St & Pacific Hwy
S D 0.95 D 0.95 D 0.95
S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.92 D 0.93 D 0.93
AM Peak
S. 272 St & I-5 northbound
Ramp (WSDOT) E 1.082 E 1.092 E 1.092
S. 272 St & Military Rd S4 F 1.092 F 1.102 F 1.102
Saturday Peak
S 316 St & Pacific Hwy
S na3 na3 D 0.92 C 0.92
S 320 St & Pacific Hwy
S na3 na3 E 0.96 E 0.942
S 320 St & 20 Av S D 0.95 D 0.99 D 0.99
S 320 St & 23 Av S E 0.92* E 0.92 E 0.93
Source: Mirai Associates, 2006
1. The City of Kent exempts intersections along Highways of Statewide Significance from their LOS threshold and
mitigation is not proposed for these intersections.
2. Results based on HCM2000 Signals software (version 4.2f), refer to DEIS Appendix 2 for additional information.
3. Meets City of Federal Way thresholds without mitigation.
4. King County requires mitigation of intersections that receive 30 trips in an hour or 20% of the proposed new
trips and exceeds LOS F. Less than 2% of project trips access the King County intersection of Military road/272nd Street, therefore, mitigation is not proposed for these intersections..
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 3-12
Revision to DEIS page 3-73
Neighborhood Traffic Control – Development within the project area may be required to
include actions to reduce the impact of cut through trafficpotential cut-through traffic impacts
on residential areas surrounding City Center. Examples of neighborhood traffic control
actions include: turn restrictions, speed controls, traffic enforcement, and parking restrictions.
The following mitigation recommended mitigation measures shall support the following City
of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2003 revision) Transportation Element (Chapter 3):
3.5 Revisions to DEIS Public Services Analysis
Revisions to DEIS page 3-77
Table 3-31 shows the breakdown of the major call types of calls for service for each of these
reporting districts.
Table 3-31. Calls for Service in City Center Project Area
2001 20012002 2003 2004 2005
Crime
Type
City
Center City
City
Center City
City
Center City
City
Center City
City
Center City
Homicide 0 4 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 8
Rape 4 43 1 49 3 50 1 50 2 55
Robbery 19 128 14 124 23 125 23 121 23 153
Felony
Assault
9 158 7 141 37 120 40 109 36 101
Burglary 26 521 36 677 37 672 30 759 32 793
Auto Theft 128 1179 85 206 78 3145 68 1118 126 1573
Larceny 743 3516 738 3347 743 1204 421 3257 753 3786
Arson 2 17 0 29 1 14 1 23 0 24
Total 931 5566 881 4577 923 5332 584 5437 972 6493
Crime %
in City
Center
16.73% 19.25% 17.31% 10.74% 14.97%
Source: Federal Way Department of Public Safety, 2006
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 3-13
Revision to DEIS page 3-77
Table 3-32. Traffic Enforcement Activity 2005
Citywide RD76 RD74 RD48 City Center
Area
Type of
Activity
# of calls # of
calls
% # of
calls
% # of
calls
% # of
calls
%
Collisions 2,256 25 1.1 35 1.6 18 0.8 78 3.5%
Traffic Stops 13,205 35 0.2 555 4.2 96 0.7 686 5.1%
DUI Arrests 359 1 0.3 5 1.4 3 0.8 9 2.5%
Source: Federal Way Department of Public Safety, 2006.
Revision to DEIS page 3-78
Fire and EMS
Station 62 is located at 31617 1st Avenue S. and Station 64 is located at 3203 S. 360th3700 S
320th Street, Auburn.
Major equipment at Station 62 includes a 2002 KME Pumper, 2003 Road Rescue Aid Car,
2003 Suburban Command Vehicle, 1991 Pierce 105 foot' Aerial Ladder Truck.
Service area wide, between 2004-2005, fire calls increased by 2.7 percent, and emergency
medical services increased by 4.6 percent.
Revision to DEIS page 3-79
When the City of Federal Way incorporated in 1990, there were approximately eight acres of
park land available per 1,000 population. Since that time, the City has purchased additional
property and developed new facilities. As of 2005, the City provided 11.79 acres of park land
per 1,000 population, compared to an adopted level of service of 10.9 acres of park land per
1,000 population.
Some school facilities, such as Truman High School, located just east of the project area, are
available nights and weekends for use by public residents.
A community center and pool at Celebration Park is plannedcurrently under construction.
Revision to DEIS page 3-80
Assuming that some of these additional revenues are provided for police protection, the
Federal Way Police Department concludes that it will have adequate existing and planned
capacity to meet the increased demand under any of the alternatives (Brian J. Wilson, Federal
Way Department of Public Safety, 2003).
Development of either of the action alternatives will result in an additional 1,770 new
residents and 3,677 new employees in the City Center project area. The additional residents
will result in an increased demand for 19.3 acres of new park land, according to the City's
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 3-14
2002 level of service goal of 10.9 acres per 1,000 population. Under Alternative 3, the 638
new residents would result in an increased demand for approximately 7 acres of park land.
Revisions to DEIS page 3-81
In the future, the City may wish to consider identification of an open space standard on level
of service standard for employees.
Coordinate with the Federal Way Parks, and Recreation and Cultural Services
Department to identify opportunities for increased recreational open space for general
public use throughout the project area, and within new development proposals.
3.6 Corrections Utilities Analysis
Revisions to DEIS page 3-81
Water
The Lakehaven Utility District provides domestic water for the entire Cityto most of the City
of Federal Way, including the City Center project area. Other water service providers that
serve the City include Tacoma Public Utilities and Highline Water District.
The November 1998 Lakehaven Comprehensive Water System Plan Update (CWSU) sets
forth projected facility needs and standards.
Revision to DEIS page 3-82
Table 3-34. Water and Sewer Service Demand Estimates
Type of Use
Estimated Usage Units
(Residential Equivalent)
Equivalent Peak Water
Demand (per day)
Equivalent Sewer
Discharge (per day)
Residential 1 residential equivalent (2.45
persons)
225 gallons per day (gpd) 220 gpd
Restaurant 3 per 1,000sf 675 gpd per 1,000sf 660 gpd per 1,000sf
Retail 0.2 per 1,000sf 45 gpd per 1,000sf 44 gpd per 1,000sf
Office 0.3 per 1,000sf 68 gpd per 1,000sf 66 gpd per 1,000sf
Source: Lakehaven Utility District 2003, 2006
Water pressureAvailable fire flow is not a limitation in the City Center project area. For
example, 10,000 gallons per minute of flow is possible at the intersection of 320th and SR 99.
This amount of pressure available fire flow is ample for a typical urban commercial center.
The pressure boundary is located within the City Center along 320th. The pressure zone
boundary allows large water consumption in one area (i.e., north of 320th) not to affect water
pressureavailable fire flow to other areas (i.e., south of 320th).
A portion of the District's water supply and storage program includes ASR (Aquifer Storage
and Recovery). This program includes: direct recharge of reclaimed groundwater, natural
recharge of potable aquifers, discharge of reclaimed water to wetlands, commercial reuse, and
landscape irrigation of reclaimed water. The ASR storage pond is currently undergoing
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 3-15
review and will have a 50 MGD capacity.The District’s underground Aquifer Storage and
Recovery program is currently undergoing review and will have a capacity up to 50 MGD.
This storage facility is expected to be fully functional by 2024.
Two new pump stations will be added at 1st Ave and the BPA right-of-way, and 44th Ave S
and the BPA right-of-way (east of Military Road). Both of these stations are expected to be
up and running by 2005.
Revisions to DEIS pp. 3-82 - 83
Sewer
The Lakehaven Utility District also provides sewer service tomost of the City of Federal
Way, including the City Center project area. The other sewer service provider in the City is
the Midway Sewer District.
The trunk system collects wastewater from drainage basins and conveys it to the applicable
treatment plant primarily by gravity flow.
Two new pump stations will be added at 1st Ave and the BPA right-of-way, and 44th and the
BPA right-of-way (east of Military Road). Both of these stations are expected to be up and
running by 2005.
Revision to DEIS page 3-85
Long Range range plans for the years 2008-2009 call for installation of a 16" STW High
Pressure supply main from Auburn Valley to the Star Lake area, and the route is still in the
planning stage.
Wireless Networks
The Federal Way area is currently served with wireless service by Qwest, AT&T Wireless,
AirTouchVerizon Wireless, GTE, Sprint, Nextel, Metricom, and VoiceStream. All of these
technologies use a line-of-sight radio signal transmitted and received by antennas.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 4-1
Chapter 4
Comments and Responses
Chapter 4 of this Final EIS contains written and verbal comments provided on the Draft EIS
during the EIS comment period. The comment period for the Draft EIS extended from June
26 to July 25, 2006. Written comments received during this period, as well as comments
received at the July 13, 2006 public meeting are included in this Chapter. Responses to
comments follow the comments section.
4.1 Public Comments
Public comments received during the comment period include the following:
Letters
Letter Number Date of Comment Author
Public Agencies
1 July 19, 2004 King County Department of Transportation (Gary
Kriedt)
2 July 3, 2004 Lakehaven Utility District (Bert Ross and Don
Perry)
Citizens
3 July 15, 2006 H. David Kaplan
July 22, 2004 Public Hearing Comments
Comment Number Date Author
1 - 13 July 13, 2006 H. David Kaplan
"Don Perry" <DPerry@lakehaven.org> 7/3/2006 4:13 PM >>>
Patrick here are Lakehaven's comments on the above listed subject. The changes are
offered below in Bert Ross's email to me.
From: Bert Ross
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 4:01 PM
To: Don Perry
Cc: Wes Hill
Subject: City of Federal Way's City Center Planned Action Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS) - Lakehaven Impacts
Don,
In response to your request, I reviewed relevant portions of the above-referenced
document to determine the reasonableness of the impacts on the water and sewer
systems that they describe as resulting from the City's proposed long-term land use
development of the City Center bounded by South 312th Street, South 324th Street,
Pacific Highway South, and 23rd Avenue South. I re-scanned the relevant portions of
this 136-page DEIS and am attaching it to this e-mail.
I note the following need to be changed to:
1) Page 3-81, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Water", first paragraph,
first line:
Lakehaven provides water service to most, but not all, of the City of Federal Way
territory. Other water service providers in the City are Tacoma Public Utilities and
Highline Water District.
2) Page 3-81, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Water", second
paragraph, first line:
The name of the cited document is "...Lakehaven Comprehensive Water System Plan
Update..."
3) Page 3-82, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Water", Table 3-34,
fourth column:
The "gpd/ gallons per day" units of measure should be inserted for the equivalent
sewer discharge figures.
4) Page 3-82, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Water", second
paragraph, first, third, and fifth lines:
The words "pressure" and "water pressure" are not used in the correct context; the
words "available fire flow" are more aptly intended here.
5) Page 3-82, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Water", second
paragraph, third and fourth lines:
The term "pressure boundary" should be changed to "pressure zone boundary."
6) Page 3-82, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Water", third paragraph,
third line:
"Commercial reuse" is not part of the District's ASR program. Water reuse and
reclamation is a separate program.
7) Page 3-82, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Water", third paragraph,
fourth line:
To make it perfectly clear, the third sentence should read: "The District's underground
Aquifer Storage and Recovery program is currently undergoing review and will have
a capacity up to 50 MGD."
8) Page 3-82, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Sewer", fifth paragraph,
first line:
Lakehaven provides sewer service to most, but not all, of the City of Federal Way
territory. The other sewer service provider in the City is Midway Sewer District.
9) Page 3-83, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Sewer", first partial
paragraph, first line:
The sentence that starts on the previous page should read: "The trunk system collects
wastewater from drainage basins and conveys it to the applicable treatment plant
primarily by gravity flow." It should not be implied that all of the sewage flow
generated within Lakehaven's sewer service area is conveyed to a single treatment
plant.
10) Page 3-83, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Sewer",third full
paragraph, fourth and fifth lines:
The two pump stations cited are water facilities, rather than sewer facilities.
11) Page 3-86, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Impacts/ Water and SanitarySewer Service",
second paragraph, sixth through ninth line: We acknowledge that the projected flow
impact on the water and sewer systems under the "worst case" scenarios identified are
0.38 MGD and 0.38 MGD, respectively (a relatively small impact indeed).
12) Page 4-2, Section 4.2 "Personal Communications", second citation:
Stan French is Lakehaven's Water Quality/Production Engineer, not the General
Manager.
Comments are due back to Patrick Doherty of the City by July 25.
Bert
Federal Way City Center DEIS-Water & Sewer Portion 6-06.pdf
1
July 15, 2006
TO: Patrick Doherty
FROM: H. David Kaplan
CC: Derek Matheson
RE: City Center Planned Action EIS
I have reviewed this 89 page document, subsequent to our meeting on July 13. My approach to
reading it was to seek CLARITY, CONSISTENCY and ACCURACY. I did not check
tabulations in tables; that’s for the specialists to do. I did not include remarks on accepted
journalistic procedure (like numbers under ten being written out), since there was too much nit-
picking involved. I also assumed certain acronyms were immediately understood without being
written out (SEPA, EIS, RCW et al). But others should be spelled out the first time they are used.
Therefore, listed below are my suggestions for clarity, consistency and accuracy.
Page 1-3. This is the first time CO is used for Carbon Monoxide. The gaseous chemical should
be written out in words.
Page 1-4. Even though NOx and PM10 are defined on pages 3-1 and 3-2, they should be
written out here as Oxides of Nitrogen and Particulate Matter smaller than 10 microns.
NAAQS should be written out as National Ambient Air Quality Standards and
PSCAA should be written out as Puget Sound Clean Air Authority.
Page 1-5. Only structured parking is mentioned in this table. Won’t surface parking be
allowed?
Page 1-7. Visual Character. End of first sentence I assume should be “center”, not “cent.”
Light and Glare. “Streetlights” should be two words.
Page 1-11. Park and Recreation LOS. “Parkland” needs to be two words. (This is true throughout
the document and will be noted elsewhere where appropriate). Clarify that
the additional 19.3 acres of park land needed due to the development in this area is
to be fulfilled throughout the city, not just in the Planned Area?
Page 1-12. Mitigation Measures. “CPTED” should be spelled out. Even I don’t know what it is!
3.6 Water and Sewer. Third sentence needs a “3” put in after “Alternative” and
before “is”.
3.6 Energy. This is the first time PSE is used. Spell it out.
Page 1-13. Transportation. This is the first time “TDM” is used. Spell it out.
Figure 1. The proper name is Lake Dolloff, not Dolloff Lake.
2
Page 2.6 First paragraph under bullets, third line. Why is “c” in brackets: [c]?
Page 3.2 Table 3-1. Add CO after Carbon Monoxide, since that is how you refer to the gaseous
chemical on page 3.3 and this addition adds clarification.
Should “Nitrogen Dioxide” in the table be “Oxides of Nitrogen” for consistency?
Page 3.3 Transportation. Delete “Washington” from Clean Air Washington Act for correct title.
Page 3.6 Three paragraphs from the bottom.” Carbon Monoxide (CO)” is redundant, since the
identification has already been spelled out. You could just say “CO”.
Page 3-13. Review the numbers for Vacant and Redevelopable Land based on our July 13
discussion.
Page 3-20. Why isn’t the City of Federal Way included in the listing of Large Employers?
The designation should be included for p.r. and perspective reasons. If the City
doesn’t have 500 employees (and I don’t think we do), then change the parameters
so that we are included.
The last paragraph on the page, under Alternative 1, wording refers to Table 3-11
as showing square feet of office space. Table 3-11 is actually Population and
Employment Projections. No mention is made of square feet of anything.
Page 3-22. Land Use Capability. Alternative 2 refers to 145’; delete quote and insert “feet”.
Page 3-27. Why does the report say that there is only ONE outbuilding on the Mall property?
Isn’t WAMU’s building considered an “outbuilding”? There is an omission of the
four new building pads on the 320th side of the Mall. Perhaps by the time this
document is printed, the Mall will let us say who will be building there, or at least
the generic type of structure (bank, restaurant etc.).
Page 3-32. Example Development Area 2. All of the site is not vacant, since a new restaurant
is currently being built at the 316th street end. TOYS R US is no longer across the
street.
Example Development Area 4. Sound Transit Center is an incorrect name. It is the
Federal Way Transit Center. (The sign above the driveway says so!) And, the Center
is not “planned”, it is “recently built”, or “was opened in 2006”.
Example Development Area 6. Next to last line. “Small retail strips”. That is plural
and wrong. There is only one strip on the site.
Page 3-46. Second paragraph from the bottom. “I-5 has five travel lanes north of S 320 Street
and four lanes south of S 320 Street…” Will this change after all the road work
is completed?
3
Page 3-47. “272 Street…connects Pacific Highway South to Interstate 5 and SR-516”. Where
is the SR-516 connection?
Pages 3-66, 3-71, 3-72, 3-73. Why print City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan in italics?
Page 3-76. Fourth paragraph down. Should “Part 1 Crimes” be “Priority 1 Crimes”?
In Footnote 1, the first listing is “Priority E” with “Emergency” directly below.
This is confusing and possibly redundant.
Page 3-77. Table 3-31. The second column heading should be 2002, not 2001.
Page 3-78. End of first paragraph. Isn’t Fire Station 64 on S. 320th, not S. 360th?
End of third paragraph. Pierce 105’ should be Pierce 105 foot.
Three lines from the bottom of the page: space needed between “2.7” and “percent”.
Page 3-79. Second, third and fourth line of Parks and Recreation. “Parkland” should be two
words. Next to last paragraph, last line. Delete “public” before “residents”. Last
line of Parks and Recreation: change to “A Community Center and Pool at
Celebration Park is currently under construction”. Delete “is planned”.
Page 3-80. Three lines from the end of Police commentary. Should there be a period after the
middle initial in Brian J. Wilson’s name?
Under Parks and Recreation, change “parkland” in third and fifth line to two words.
Last sentence of the page. Insert “an” after “of” and before “open space standard”.
Page 3-81. Second bulleted item. Correct department name is Parks, Recreation and Cultural
Services Department.
Page 3-82. I am confused. In one area the document talks about an average of 214 gallons
consumption and then shortly after 225 gallons consumed. This needs to be
clarified.
Page 3-83. Two lines above Electricity heading. 44th what (Street, Drive, Place, Road, Court,
Avenue)?
Page 3-84. Third paragraph down. End of second line. Enchanted what (Parkway, Village etc.)?
Page 3-85. Third line down. Why is the “r’ in Range, capitalized?
Telecommunications and Wirelesss Networks. Is Air Touch still in business? I
thought that company was bought by Vodaphone or Verizon.
City of Federal Way
City Center Planned Action Draft EIS
Meeting Summary
Draft EIS Public Meeting
The meeting began at 5:00 PM on July 23, 2006 at the City of Federal Way City Hall
Council Chambers. Staff inattendance were Patrick Doherty and Rick Perez from the
City of Federal Way and Deborah Munkberg from Jones & Stokes.
Deborah Munkberg provided a short overview of the proposal and findings of the Draft
EIS.
H. David Kaplan, 30240 27th Avenue South, Federal Way, provided the following
comments:
Mr. Kaplan asked why the entire Core and Frame areas were not included as the project
area? Patrick Doherty explained that the City selected the area with the greatest
potential for redevelopment as the project area.
Mr. Kaplan noted that at a recent King County Library System meeting, there was
discussion of purchase of an office property next to the 320th library. He observed that
the project area for the Planned Action EIS does not include this site and was concerned
about whether not being included in the Planned Action area would create a difficulty for
redevelopment of that site. Mr. Doherty confirmed that was correct and said that the
benefit of a planned action designation would be greatest for larger projects, rather than
small individual office projects.
Mr. Kaplan stated that the City should provide information to the public on the
boundaries of the project area and should look for ways to get information about the
benefits of the planned action designation to developers.
Mr. Kaplan stated that he preferred Alternative 2 to Alternative 1. He noted that the
lowest elevation of the project area is south of South 320th Street and rises to the
northern boundary of the project area. He stated that buildings should stair-step up the
hill, with taller buildings located on the properties to the north, which have views to the
south, including Mount Rainier. He would prefer to allow development to spread out
rather than concentrate along South 320th Street. He stated that Alternative 2 would
permit more variety, balance the density better, provide more open space for
development, and result in more dispersed transportation impacts.
Mr. Doherty explained that the northern portion of the project area is actually in the City
Center Frame, rather than the Core and that building height limits are lower in the Frame
than in the Core. Mr. Kaplan stated that should be considered as a change. Mr.
Doherty acknowledged the comments, stating that it was a policy issue that has been
raised in other settings, but is not part of the proposal for this EIS.
Mr. Kaplan reiterated his preference for Alternative 2. Mr. Doherty stated that the
purpose of the alternatives in the EIS was to bracket the range of possible future
scenarios and that either scenario could potentially occur in the future. Mr. Kaplan stated
that, if that’s the case, then the designation of “alternatives” was confusing and should
be clarified in the EIS.
Mr. Kaplan asked about the mitigation measure that calls for an additional right turn lane
from 20th onto South 320th, specifically about the building that was recently built at this
location? Mr. Perez stated that a new sidewalk would have to be routed around the
building.
Mr. Doherty noted that this mitigation measure is intended to address Saturday peak
hour conditions. Historically, the City has not collected mitigation for the Saturday peak,
but has focused on the PM peak hour. Mr. Doherty stated that this does not mean that
the City won’t mitigate for the Saturday peak hour, but that that policy decision has not
been made yet.
Mr. Kaplan asked about the mitigation measure calling for an additional right turn lane
from 23rd South onto South 320th, specifically the sidewalk in this location? Mr. Doherty
stated that the sidewalk would have to be replaced.
Mr. Kaplan asked what is the open space requirement for mixed use? Mr. Doherty
summarized recent zoning code changes in the Core. He said that open space is
required to gain additional height, for example from 95’ to 145” under the current Code.
Mr. Kaplan asked what type of open space is permitted? Mr. Doherty responded that
open space is whatever would work in the location, including paved plazas and
landscaped areas.
Mr. Kaplan asked how mixed use would be considered, as residential or office in terms
of which height limit would apply? Mr. Doherty responded that the commercial base
would be governed by commercial standards and the residential floors above would be
considered residential.
Mr. Doherty noted that for residential uses, there is a requirement of 200 sf of open
space per unit. He said that this could be provided either as public open space, or as
private open space, including private workout rooms in residential buildings, rooftop
gardens, balconies and other similar features.
Mr. Kaplan identified corrections needed to Figure 7 and asked how “redevelopable”
properties were identified. Ms. Munkberg stated that is based on the City’s Buildable
Lands methodology, which considers property to be redevelopable if the structure is
valued at 50% or less of the property value according to the King County Assessor’s
office. Mr. Kaplan stated that should be more clearly stated in the EIS. Mr. Doherty
commented that the City will consider local knowledge in addition to this methodology in
revising this figure for the Final EIS. Mr. Kaplan specifically asked whether the former
Toys R Us and Target buildings would now be considered redevelopable sites. Mr.
Doherty and Ms. Munkberg indicated that they would consider those sites as potential
“redevelopable” sites for these purposes. Mr. Kaplan also indicated that two sites
indicated as “vacant” in Figure 7 were now developed or under development: the
Woodstone Credit Union site on 316th and the Original Roadhouse Grill site at 316th and
20th Ave.
Mr. Kaplan noted that the Federal Way Transit Center label should be removed in Figure
8.
Mr. Kaplan stated that he intended to review the document more fully and provide written
comment to the City by the July 25 deadline for written comment.
The meeting ended at 6:00 pm.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 4-11
4.2 Responses to Comments
Comment Letters
Comment Number Response
Letter 1: King County Department of Transportation
1 Your preference for Alternative 1 is noted. Please see the updated text in Chapter 2 of this FEIS that
clarifies that the action alternatives are provided in the EIS for purpose of comparison and analysis.
Adoption of a planned action designation by the City would apply to the project area as a whole;
adoption of a specific action alternative is not necessary for implementation of the proposal.
2 The transit route corrections that you note have been inserted in Section 3.4, Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
3 Your comments are acknowledged. The City will work with development project applicants to ensure
that the bus stop information that you refer to is included in individual project reviews as appropriate.
Letter 2: Lakehaven Utility District
1 The service provider correction that you provided has been inserted in Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this
FEIS.
2 The correction to the document title that you provided has been inserted in Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of
this FEIS.
3 The insertion of “gpd/gallons per day” to Table 3-34 that you recommend is shown Section 3.6,
Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
4 The phrase “available fire flow” has been inserted per your comment, please see Section 3.6,
Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
5 “Pressure zone boundary” has been inserted in place of “pressure boundary” per your comment,
please see Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
6 Reference to commercial reuse has been deleted, see Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
7 The referenced sentence has been re-worded per your comment, see Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this
FEIS.
8 The service provider correction that you provided has been inserted in Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this
FEIS.
9 The correction that you provided has been inserted in Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. This
correction clarifies that Lakehaven treats sewer effluent in more than a single treatment plant.
10 The text that you refer to has been shifted to the correct location in the discussion of domestic water
service, please see Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
11 Your comments are acknowledged.
12 Mr. French’s correct title has been inserted in Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
Letter 3: H. David Kaplan
1 Carbon monoxide has been written out adjacent to the acronym CO. Please see FEIS Chapter 1.
2 Nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter smaller than 10 microns, National Ambient Air Quality Standards,
and Puget Sound Clean Air Authority have all been written out next to their acronyms. Nitrogen
dioxide is used in place of oxides of nitrogen as the term commonly used and understood by the lay
reader.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 4-12
Comment Letters
Comment Number Response
3 Structured parking is included as an element of the Proposed Action, which is why it is called out
specifically in Table 1-1. Surface parking will continue to be permitted in the City Center project area,
but is not identified as a specific type of development because it is not an element of the Proposed
Action.
4 The typographical error that you note has been corrected. “Streetlights” has been divided into two
words, “street lights.” Please see Chapter 1 of this FEIS.
5 The term “parkland” has been divided into two words, “park lands” here and elsewhere in the
document. Please see Chapters 1 and 3 of this FEIS.
6 Crime prevention through environmental design and Puget Sound Energy have been spelled out next
to their acronyms. The typographical error that you note has been corrected. Please see Chapter 1
of this FEIS.
7 Transportation demand management has been spelled out next to the acronym. Please see Chapter
1 of this FEIS.
8 The name of Lake Doloff has been corrected in Figure 1 of this FEIS.
9 The “c” is in brackets because it is lower case and the text that it is extracted from is in upper case.
The brackets are a convention intended to show that the quote was modified from the original
source.
10 The acronym for carbon monoxide has been added, please see Section 3.1, Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
Nitrogen Dioxide has been left as is because it is a term that is in more common use than oxides of
nitrogen and more likely to be understood by the lay reader.
11 The title of the Clean Air Act has been corrected, please see Section 3.1, Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
12 The acronym CO has been inserted in place of carbon monoxide, please see Section 3.6, Chapter 3
of this FEIS.
13 The vacant and redevelopable land information has been updated. Please see Section 3.2, Chapter
3 of this FEIS.
14 The City of Federal Way has been inserted as a major employer. Please see Section 3.2, Chapter 3
of this FEIS.
15 The reference to Table 3-11 has been deleted. Please see section 3.2, Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
16 The measurement “feet” has been written out, see Section 3.2, Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
17 The correction to the number of outbuildings on the Mall property has bee inserted in Section 3.2,
Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
18 Updated information for Example Development Area 2 has been inserted, see Section 3.3, Chapter 3
of this FEIS.
19 Updated information for Example Development Area 4 has been inserted, see Section 3.3, Chapter 3
of this FEIS.
20 Updated information for Example Development Area 6 has been inserted, see Section 3.3, Chapter 3
of this FEIS.
21 According to the Federal Way Department of Public Works, the final lane configuration has not been
finalized.
22 272nd Street connects to SR 516 approximately 5 miles to the east of I-5 on the east side of Kent.
23 Italics were used as a convention in the DEIS to denote the titles of documents.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 4-13
Comment Letters
Comment Number Response
24 “Part 1 Crimes” is the term provided by the City of Federal Way Police Department. The word
“emergency” in Footnote 1 is intended to clarify the meaning of “Priority E.”
25 The correction that you provided has been inserted in Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
26 As you note, the correct address for Fire Station 64 is 3700 South 320th Street, Auburn. This and the
remaining corrections that you note in this comment have been inserted in Section 3.5, Chapter 3 of
this FEIS.
27 The word “parkland” has been revised to “park land” in the noted locations. The word “public” has
been deleted as suggested and the referenced sentence has been changed to state that the
community center and pool at Celebration Park are currently under construction. Please see Section
3.5, Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
28 The punctuation correction that you note has been inserted, see Section 3.5, Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
29 The word “parkland” has been revised to “park land” in the noted locations.
30 The grammatical correction that you noted has been inserted in Section 3.5, Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
31 The correction to the name of the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department has been
inserted in Section 3.5, Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
32 Please see DEIS, page 3-82. In the Federal Way area, the average daily consumption per
residential equivalent is 214 gallons. This compares to 225 gallons per day per residential equivalent
during peak periods. The difference between the two numbers is the difference between average
and peak period use.
33 The reference has been corrected to read 44th Ave S. Please see Section 3.5, Chapter 3 of this
FEIS.
34 “Enchanted” is the full name of the future distribution substation planned by Puget Sound Energy.
35 Capitalization has been corrected and the reference to AirTouch has been corrected to Verizon
Wireless. Please see Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
Public Hearing
Comment Number Response
1 As noted in the meeting summary, the City selected a portion of the City Center sub-area judged to
have the greatest potential for redevelopment.
2 Comments are acknowledged.
3 Comments are acknowledged.
4 Comments regarding preference for Alternative 2 are acknowledged. Please see the updated text in
Chapter 2 of this FEIS that clarifies that the action alternatives are provided in the EIS for purpose of
comparison and analysis. Adoption of a planned action designation by the City would apply to the
project area as a whole; adoption of a specific action alternative is not necessary for implementation
of the proposal.
5 Comments regarding building heights in the City Center Core and Frame are acknowledged.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 4-14
Public Hearing
Comment Number Response
6 Comments regarding preference for Alternative 2 are acknowledged. Please see the updated text in
Chapter 2 of this FEIS that clarifies that the action alternatives are provided in the EIS for purpose of
comparison and analysis. Adoption of a planned action designation by the City would apply to the
project area as a whole; adoption of a specific action alternative is not necessary for implementation
of the proposal.
7 Question regarding the mitigation measure calling for an additional right turn lane from 20th Ave S to
S 320th St is acknowledged. As noted in the meeting summary, a new sidewalk would have to be
routed around the building. As also noted, this measure would mitigate for Saturday impacts, which
is a policy decision yet to be made by the City.
8 Question regarding the mitigation measure calling for an additional right turn lane from 23rd Ave S to
S 320th Ave is acknowledged. As noted n the meeting summary, the sidewalk would have to be
replaced.
9 Questions and comments regarding open space requirements for residential uses in the Core are
acknowledged.
10 The question regarding how mixed use is considered for purposes of open space requirements is
acknowledged. As noted in the meeting summary, the portion of a mixed-use building that is
residential would be considered residential.
11 Comments regarding corrections to DEIS Figure 7 are acknowledged and have been inserted in
Section 3.2, Chapter 3 of this FEIS.
12 The Federal Way Transit Center label has been removed from Figures 2 and 8. Please see revised
figures in this FEIS.
13 Please refer to comments and responses to Letter #3.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 5-1
Chapter 5
References
5.1 Printed References
Federal Way Fire Department, 2004. 2003 Annual Report.
Federal Way, City of. 1993. Draft Environmental Impact Statement Comprehensive Plan: Cityshape
from Vision to Plan.
———. 1995. Final Environmental Impact Statement Comprehensive Plan and Development
Regulations.
———. March 18, 2002. Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Inventory.
———. 2006. Comprehensive Plan. http://www.ci.federal-way.wa.us/
———. 2006. Chapter 22 City Code.
http://search.mrsc.org/nxt/gateway.dll/fdwymc?f=templates&fn=fdwypage.htm$vid=municodes:Fede
ralWay
———. 2003. Zoning and Wetland Atlas. http://www.ci.federal-way.wa.us/gis/zoning/zindx.htm.
King County. September 2002. King County Buildable Lands Evaluation Report 2002.
http://www.metrokc.gov/budget/buildland/bldlnd02.htm
King County, 2006. GIS Center Parcel Viewer.
http://www.metrokc.gov/gis/mapportal/PViewer_main.htm
KJS Associates, Inc. (KJS). 1995. Guidebook for Conformity. KJS Associates, Inc.
Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). 2003. Air Quality Conformity Analysis: 2003 Air Quality
Amendment to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program. August 2003.
Sound Transit. September 2001. NEPA Environmental Assessment for the Federal Way Transit
Center/Parking Structure, and HOV Direct Access Ramp Project.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1992. User’s guide to CAL3QHC version 2.0: a modeling
methodology for predicting pollutant concentrations near roadway intersections. Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Technical Support Division, Research Triangle Park, NC. November. EPA
454/R-92-006.
City Center Planned Action
Draft Planned Action EIS 5-2
5.2 Personal Communications
Ausburn, Mary. Puget Sound Energy. Personal communication with Jamie Burrell of Jones & Stokes,
Oct 1, 2003.
French, Stan. Lakehaven Utility District, General ManagerWater Quality/Production Engineer. Personal
communication with Evan Nelson of Jones & Stokes, 2006.
Gaspard, Grant. South King County Fire and Rescue. Personal communication with Evan Nelson of
Jones & Stokes, 2006.
Landon, Michelle, Crime Analyst, Federal Way Department of Public Safety. Personal Communications
with Evan Nelson of Jones & Stokes, 2006
McGourty, Kelly. 2005. Puget Sound Regional Council. MOBILE6.2 CO emission factors e-mailed to
Jim Wilder of Jones & Stokes .
Sanders, Betty. City of Federal Way Parks and Recreation. Personal communication with Evan Nelson
of Jones & Stokes, 2006.
Wilson, Brian, Deputy Chief. Federal Way Police Department. Personal communication with Jamie
Burrell of Jones & Stokes, Oct 7, 2003. Letter transmittal Nov. 4, 2003.
Appendix 1
Distribution List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY CENTER PLANNED ACTION EIS
APPENDIX 1
Distribution List
2006 FEIS DISTRIBUTION LIST1
NATIONAL, STATE, COUNTY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT
CITY OF KENT, PLANNING SERVICES – 400 WEST GOWE STREET, KENT, WA 98032
CITY OF TACOMA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT -- 747 MARKET STREET, TACOMA WA 98402
* CITY OF FEDERAL WAY - CITY MANAGER – P.O. BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718
* CITY OF FEDERAL WAY – PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES - P.O. BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063
* CITY OF FEDERAL WAY – COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - P.O. BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718
* CITY OF FEDERAL WAY - PUBLIC WORKS - P.O. BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718
* CITY OF FEDERAL WAY- PUBLIC SAFETY - P.O. BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718
* CITY OF FEDERAL WAY- MANAGEMENT SERVICES - P.O. BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718
* SOUTH KING COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT – 31617 1ST AVE S., FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003
CITY OF AUBURN, 25 WEST MAIN, AUBURN WA 98001
CITY OF PACIFIC, 100 THIRD AVENUE SE, PACIFIC, WA 98047
CITY OF DES MOINES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT – 21630 11TH AVE SOUTH SUITE D, DES MOINES WA 98198
CITY OF MILTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -- 1000 LAUREL STREET, MILTON WA 98354
CITY OF EDGEWOOD PLANNING DEPT – 2221 MERIDIAN AVE EAST, EDGEWOOD WA 98371
ECON. DEV. COUNCIL OF SEATTLE & KING CO. -- 1301 5TH AVENUE, SUITE 2500, SEATTLE WA 98101
* KING CO DEPT OF DEV & ENVIRON SERVICES – 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW, RENTON WA
* KING CO DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION -- 201 S. JACKSON STREET, KSC-TR-0815 SEATTLE, WA 98104
CITY OF FIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT – 5411 23RD STREET EAST, FIFE WA 98424
* FEDERAL WAY REGIONAL LIBRARY, KING CO LIBRARY SYSTEM – 342 1ST WAY S, FEDERAL WAY 98003
* FEDERAL WAY 320TH LIBRARY, KING CO LIBRARY SYSTEM – 848 S 320TH, FEDERAL WAY 98003
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS -- 31405 - 18TH AVE. S., FEDERAL WAY, WA, 98003
METRO TRANSIT -- 201 S. JACKSON ST., KSC-TR-0415 SEATTLE, WA 98104
PIERCE COUNTY PLANNING AND LAND SERVICES -- 2401 SOUTH 35TH STREET, TACOMA WA 98409
PIERCE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES – 2702 SOUTH 42ND STREET, TACOMA WA 98409
PIERCE TRANSIT, P.O. BOX 99070, 3701 96TH ST SW, LAKEWOOD, WA 98499
* PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY – 110 UNION STREET, SUITE 500, SEATTLE WA 98101
* PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL – 1011 WESTERN AVENUE, #500 SEATTLE WA 98104
* SOUND TRANSIT – 401 SOUTH JACKSON STREET, SEATTLE WA 98104
* WA ST DEPT OF ECOLOGY (2) -- SEPA UNIT, PO BOX 47703, OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703
* WA ST DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION -- PO BOX 47331 310 MAPLE PARK AVENUE SE, OLYMPIA, WA 98504-7331
WA ST ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL – 615 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 380, SEATTLE WA 98104
1 * RECEIVED A PAPER OR CD COPY. ALL OTHERS RECEIVED NOTICE.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY CENTER PLANNED ACTION EIS
APPENDIX 1
* WA STATE DEPT OF CTED, GROWTH MGMT SVCS – 906 COLUMBIA STREET SW, OLYMPIA WA 98501
WA STATE OFFICE OF GOVERNOR – PO BOX 40002, OLYMPIA WA 98504
WA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTR – PO BOX 47200, OLYMPIA WA 98504
UTILITIES
BONNEVILLE POWER ASSOCIATION, PO BOX 3621, PORTLAND OR 97208
KING COUNTY OFFICE OF CABLE COMMUNICATION -- 700 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 2300 SEATTLE, WA 98104
COMCAST CABLE -- 2200 N 30TH ST TACOMA WA 98403
* LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT -- 31627-1ST AVENUE SOUTH • P.O. BOX 4249 • FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003
QWEST -- 2001 6TH AVE SEATTLE WA 98121-2855
PUGET SOUND ENERGY -- 10885 NE 4TH STREET P.O. BOX 97034 BELLEVUE WA 98004
TACOMA PUBLIC UTLITIES, 3628 S 35TH STREET, TACOMA WA 98409
CITY COUNCIL & COMMISSIONS
* FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL (7 COPIES) 33325 8TH AVE S PO BOX 9718, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718
FEDERAL WAY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 33325 8TH AVE S PO BOX 9718, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063
* FEDERAL WAY PLANNING COMMISSION (8 COPIES) 33325 8TH AVE S PO BOX 9718, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718
NEWSPAPERS
DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE – 83 COLUMBIA STREET, SEATTLE WA 98104
FEDERAL WAY MIRROR, 1414 S. 324TH ST, SUITE B210, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003
FEDERAL WAY NEWS, 14006 1ST AVENUE SOUTH SUITE B BURIEN WA 98168
SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL – 600 WASHINGTON AVE SOUTH, KENT WA 98032
SEATTLE POST INTELLIGENCER – 101 ELLIOTT AVE WEST, SEATTLE WA 98119
SEATTLE TIMES – PO BOX 70, SEATTLE WA 98109
NEWS TRIBUNE – 1950 SOUTH STATE STREET, TACOMA WA 98405
ORGANIZATIONS
FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, P.O. BOX 3440 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063
MASTER BUILDERS OF KING AND SNOHOMISH COUNTIES, 335 116TH AVE SE, BELLEVUE WA 98004
INDIVIDUALS
* H. DAVID KAPLAN, 30240 27TH AVE SOUTH, FEDERAL WAY 98003