The URL can be used to link to this page

LUTC PKT 11-07-2016City of Federal Way City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee November 7, 2016 City Hall 5:00 p.m. Council Chambers MEETING AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes) 3. COMMITTEE BUSINESS Action Topic Title/ Description Presenter Page or Info Council Date Time A. Approval of Minutes: September 12, 2016 Upton 3 Action N/A 5 min B. Resolution: Norpoint Heights Final Plat Harris 7 Action November 15, 2016 5 min Consent C. 21st Ave S Sidewalks Improvement Project Mullen 23 Action November 15, 2016 5 min (S 320th Street to S 316th Street) -100% Consent Design Status Report and Authorization to Bid D. Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance Tang 25 Action November 15, 2016 10 min System Repair Phase II -85% Design Consent Status Report and Authorization to Bid E. Authorization to Accept the King County Tang 29 Action November 15, 2016 5 min Flood Control District Flood Reduction Grant Consent F. Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance Tang 31 Action November 15, 2016 5 min System Repair Phase 1 -Project Acceptance Consent G. Grant Funding for Transportation Perez 33 Action November 15, 2016 5 min Improvement Projects -Authorization to Business Accept Grant Funding H. New Street Lighting Prioritization Criteria Perez 35 Action November 15, 2016 10 min Consent I. Ordinance: for the Adoption of the 2016 Walsh 41 Action November 15, 2016 10 min King County Washington Surface Water Ordinance Design Manual and the 2016 City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County Surface Water Design Manual ]. 2017 Street Sweeping Services Contract -Winkler 73 Action November 15, 2016 5 min Bid Award Consent K. 2017 Right of Way Landscape Maintenance Winkler 75 Action November 15, 2016 5 min Contract -Bid Award Consent 4. OTHER 5. FUT1.JRE MEmNGS/AGENDA ITEMS: The next LUTC meeting will be Monday, December 5, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers. 6. ADJOURN Committee Members Kelly Maloney, Chair Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member Mark Koppang, Member City Staff Marwan Salloum P.E, Public Works Director Shawna Upton, Administrative Assistant II 253-835-2703 This page left blank intentionally. 2 City of Federal Way City Council Land Use/Transportation Commi~ee September 12, 2016 5:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers MEETING SUMMARY Committee Members in Attendance: Committee Chair Kelly Maloney and Committee members Lydia Assefa-Dawson and Mark Koppang. Council members in attendance: Deputy Mayor Burbidge. Staff in Attendance: Public Works Director Marwan Salloum, Deputy Public Works Director/Street Systems Manager Desiree Winkler, Assistant City Attorney Mark Orthmann, Surface Water Manager Theresa Thurlow, Street Systems Project Engineer Christine Mullen, Street Systems Project Engineer Naveen Chandra, and Administrative Assistant II Shawna Upton. 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Maloney called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM . 2. PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes) None. 3. COMMITTEE BUSINESS Topic Title/Description A. Approval of Minutes: August 1, 2016 B. Committee approved the August 1, 2016 LUTC minutes as presented. Moved: Koppang Seconded: Assefa-Dawson Passed: 3-0 Steel Lake Park to Downtown Trail -30% Design Status Report Ms. Mullen stated this project will install an 8-foot sidewalk on the south side of S 31ih Street from the entrance to Steel Lake Park to 24th Ave South as well as a bike lane, planter strip, illumination and other improvements. She outlined the completed tasks, ongoing tasks and detailed estimated expenditures and available funding. Currently, there is a budget shortfall. Staff has applied for grants that may cover a portion of the project and will refine project costs as they proceed with design. Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented. Moved: Assefa-Dawson Seconded: Koppang Passed: 3-0 Forward to Council N/A September 20, 2016 Consent Committee Members Kelly Maloney, Chair Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member Mark Koppang, Member 3 City Staff Marwan Salloum, P.E., Public Works Director Shawna Upton, Administrative Assistant II 253-835-2703 C. S 356th Street (Pacific Highway South to Enchanted Parkway) Improvement Project -September 20, 2016 D. 100% Design Status Report and Authorization to Bid Consent Mr. Chandra indicated this project will widen S 356th Street to five lanes with bike lanes and will also include utility relocation, storm drainage improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, traffic signal modification, signing, channelization and landscaping. He noted estimated expenditures, available funding and mentioned staff are working to secure grant funding. Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented. Moved: Koppang Seconded: Assefa-Dawson Passed: 3-0 Demolition of Structures at 36818 sth Ave S Ms. Thurlow stated the 2 acre Larson-Justice property has six structures on it and was acquired by the City in December 2015. This City intended to demolish the structures so the parcel could be used as conservation open space and future trailhead location for the West Hylebos Wetlands Park trail system. Since acquisition, staff pursued authorization to demolish the structures at the June 6, 2016 LUTC meeting. At that time, the Committee decision was to delay demolition and gather information regarding the historic value and preservation of the structures. City staff reached out to the King County Historic Preservation Program for an assessment of the house and outbuildings. In the King County report, the outbuildings were noted to be in very poor condition and unlikely to be salvageable. The report outlined three potential use options which include; 1) restore the house as a museum or an interpretive facility for the Historical Society of Federal Way, 2) adaptively rehabilitate the house as a facility associated with the West Hylebos Watershed Trail Project to be used for educational and interpretive purposes, trail visitor center, or even as temporary housing for visiting scholars, biologists, or environmental volunteers and 3) demolition. The report stated demolition of the house is currently the most likely scenario. It further stated that because of the rarity of this historic resource, it would be wise for the city to explore options on how to mitigate for the loss. Staff analyzed the options and found options one and two are not feasible at this time. The Historical Society has expressed interest in preserving the home; however, they do not have available funding for the restoration work at this time. Staff is concerned about allowing the property to sit for an indeterminate period of time noting it will result in an increased risk of vandalism, occupancy by trespassers, and further degradation of the structures themselves. If the house is restored as a museum or interpretive facility, it would require a dependable volunteer or work force to be onsite during the open house of the house to deter vandalism or occupation. At this time, the ability to staff the house during open hours has not been identified. Staff concurs with the demolition option and recommends demolition with proper documentation. She outlined estimated expenditures and available funding for the project. Diana Noble-Gulliford spoke and expressed gratitude to Council and staff for delaying the demolition until the Historical Society had an opportunity to review the historical significance of this building. She shared historical information about the Spring Valley area and the people that lived there. She hopes Council will support the study and encourages recording the history of this valley. Councilmember Koppang asked Ms. Noble-Gulliford if she knew of the specific historical significance of this particular house. Ms. Noble-Gulliford indicated she spoke to the owner's daughter before the City clesed on the transaction and the daughter asked that she not interfere with the sale of the property. Ms. Noble-Gulliford clarified that she was just looking for historical information and the daughter shared that the building was moved because it was in the way of Military Road and that it had been altered several times. Councilmember Koppang also asked staff if there was any assessment done to determine September 20, 2016 Business Committee Members Kelly Maloney, Chair 4 City Staff Marwan Salloum, P.E., Public Works Director Shawna Upton, Administrative Assistant II 253-835-2703 Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member Mark Koppang, Member the cost of restoring the building to usefulness. Staff indicated that was outside the scope of the assessment but that it would depend on what condition it would be restored to. If it were to be restored for someone to reside there, utilities would need to be provided. If it were to be restored for preservation only, it may cost less but it will be a challenge if we are preserving it without having a use for it. Councilmember Maloney asked what parameters were used for the determination that the buildings were unsalvageable. Ms. Thurlow outlined the current status of the buildings noting the barn has practically no roof, buildings are further dilapidated and the cistern is leaning significantly. She also stated the structural integrity of the buildings was a contributing factor in assessing the condition of the buildings. Councilmember Maloney asked about the possibility of moving the house and renovating it as a landmark. Ms. Thurlow indicated there are some physical limitations to moving the house such as power lines that would need to be relocated temporarily and the road is so narrow that the house would likely need to be dismantled prior to moving it. Councilmember Maloney asked about funding and who would pay for the renovations if Council did not approve of the demolition. Mr. Salloum indicated that the preservation documentation provided by King County for demolition can be paid for out of the surface water utility budget but that restoration costs would have to come from other sources. Deputy Mayor Burbidge noticed an orchard mentioned on one of the documents and wondered if we have information on the orchard specifically. Ms. Thurlow indicated we have no further information at this time but that it falls under something the consultant would pursue to find out as part of documenting the property. Councilmember Assefa-Dawson asked how quickly the demolition needs to happen. Mr. Salloum noted that staff desires it to happen sooner than later. Budget funds are available this year, the buildings continue to deteriorate and staff sees it as a safety concern. The Committee requested staff to obtain more information about costs for moving the home, potential funding sources and other end use options with estimated costs if the home was not demolished. Discussion continued regarding funding, identifying a viable use for the house, whether or not to move the house to another location, what value this home may have that would justify keeping it and the current condition of the home. Motion to forward Option 1, with the exception of the house demolition, to the September 20, 2016 City Council business agenda for approval. Moved: Maloney Seconded: Assefa-Dawson Passed: 2-1 E. Pete von Reichbauer Way S (20th Ave) and S 316th Street Sidewalk Replacement Project September 20, 2016 -Project Acceptance Consent Mr. Salloum provided background on the project noting when Town Square Park was developed, there was a requirement for the sidewalk to be upgraded on Pete von Reichbauer Way (20th Ave S) and S 316th Street. Prior to release of retainage on a Public Works construction project, the City Council must accept the project as complete to meet State Department of Revenue and State Department of Labor and Industries requirements. Committee forwarded Option #1 as presented. Moved: Assefa-Dawson Seconded: Koppang Passed: 3-0 4. OTHER Committee Members Kelly Maloney, Chair Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member Mark Koppang, Member 5 City Staff Marwan Salloum, P.E., Public Works Director Shawna Upton, Administrative Assistant II 253-835-2703 5. FUlURE MEffiNGS/AGENDA ITEMS: The next LUTC meeting will be Monday, October 3, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers. 6. ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 6:19 PM. COMMITTEE APPROVAL: Kelly Maloney, Chair Committee Members Kelly MaloneY, Chair Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member Mark Koppang, Member Attest: Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member 6 Shawna Upton, Administrative Assistant II Mark Koppang, Member City Staff Marwan Salloum, P.E, Public Works Director Shawna Upton, Administrative Assistant II 253-835-2703 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ITEM#: ---------------- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: NO RPO INT HEIGHTS FINAL PLAT APPROVAL RESOLUTION ------- POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Norpoint Heights Final Plat, (City File No. 16-102863-SU)? COMMITTEE: Land Use/Transportation CATEGORY: D Consent D City Council Business STAFF REPORT BY: Jim Harris, Planner D Ordinance ~ Resolution --- Attachments: 1. Resolution approving the Norpoint Heights Final Plat. MEETING DATE: November 7, 2016 D D Public Hearing Other DEPT: Community Development 2. Norpoint Heights Final Plat Staff Report, October 24, 2016, with exhibits. Options Considered: I . Approve the Final Plat and Resolution as presented . 2. Modify the Final Plat and/or Resolution and approve as modified. 3 . Do not approve the Final Plat and provide direction to staff. --------------- Adopt the Resolution approving the Norpoint Heights Final Plat. ylJ lo--2-,--1&, Initial /Dale CHIEF OF STAFF: Iv COMMITTEE RECOM JENO ION: J move to forward the Resolution approving the Norpoint Heights Final Plat to the November 15 , 2016 consent agenda/or approval. Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of th e Resolution approving the Norpoint Heights Final Plat." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 1VIOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinan ces 011/yj REVI SED -1/2 015 7 COUNCIL BILL It I ST rca!ling Enactment reading ORDINANCE It RESOLllTION It RESOLUTION NO. __ A RESOLUTION of the City of Federal Way, Washington, approving the Norpoint Heights Final Plat, Federal Way, Washington, File No. 16-102863-00-SU. WHEREAS, on January 27, 2010, the Federal Way Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on the Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat application resulting in the recommendation of the Federal Way Hearing Examiner, dated March 2, 2010; and WHEREAS, the Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat, City of Federal Way File No. 08- 100329-00-SU, was approved subject to conditions on April 6, 2010, by Federal Way City Council Resolution No. 10-580, which adopted the Hearing Examiner's findings and conclusions; and WHEREAS, the Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat, Federal Way City Council Resolution No. 10-580 was amended by Federal Way City Coµncil Resolution No. 12-616 on March 6, 2012, which modified the approved clearing and grading plans for the plat; and WHEREAS, the applicant submitted the final plat application for Norpoint Heights within the required 7-year completion time pursuant to RCW 58.17.140(3); and WHEREAS, the applicant has satisfied or guaranteed all of the conditions set forth in Resolution 10-580 and Resolution 12-616; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way's Community Development Department and Public Works Department staff have reviewed the proposed final plat for its conformance to the conditions of preliminary plat approval and final plat decisional criteria, and their analysis and conclusions are set forth in the Community Development Department Staff Report, dated Resolution No. I 6- 8 Page I of 4 Rev 1/15 October 24, 2016, which is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full; and WHEREAS, the City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee reviewed and considered the application and staff report for the Norpoint Heights Final Plat during its meeting on November 7, 2016; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the application and staff report for the Norpoint Heights Final Plat during the City Council's Meeting on November 15, 2016. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Findings and Conclusions. 1. The Norpoint Heights Final Plat, City of Federal Way File No. 16-102863-00-SU, is in substantial conformance to the preliminary plat and is in conformance with applicable zoning ordinances or other land use controls in effect at the time the preliminary plat application was deemed complete. 2. Based on, inter alia, the analysis and conclusions in the staff report, dated October 24, 2016, which are adopted herein by reference, and on the City Council's review of the application for final plat, the proposed subdivision makes appropriate provision for public health, safety, and general welfare, and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, and schools and school grounds as are required by city code, or which are necessary and appropriate, and provides for sidewalks and other planning features to assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school. Resolution No. 16-__ 9 Page2of4 Rev l/15 3. The public use and interest will be served by the final plat approval granted herein. 4. All conditions listed in Federal Way City Council Resolution No . 10-580, dated April 6, 2010, and Federal Way City Council Resolution 12-616, dated April 6, 2012, have been satisfied, and/or satisfaction of the conditions have been sufficiently guaranteed by the applicant as allowed by the application's vested provisions of Federal Way City Code 20-135. 5. All required improvements for final plat approval have been made, and/or sufficient bond, cash deposit, or assignment of funds have been accepted as guarantee for completion and maintenance of all required plat improvements as identified in the Staff Report. 6. All taxes and assessments owing on the property being subdivided have been paid, or will be paid, prior to recording the final plat. Section 2. Application Approval. Based upon the Findings and Conclusions contained in Section 1 above, the Norpoint Heights Final Plat, City of Federal Way File No. 16-102863-00- SU, is approved. Section 3. Recording. The approved and signed final plat, together with all legal instruments pertaining thereto, as required pursuant to all applicable codes, shall be recorded with the King County Recorder's Office. The applicant shall pay all recording fees. Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution. Res o lution No. 16-__ 10 Page 3 of 4 Rev 1/15 Section 5. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this resolution are authorized to make necessary corrections to this resolution including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener/clerical errors, references, resolution numbering, section/subsection numbers, and any references thereto. Section 6. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 7. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON this ___ day of _______ , 2016. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, JIM FERRELL ATTEST: CITY CLERK, STEPHANIE COURTNEY, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO.: Resolution No. 16- 11 Page 4 of4 Rev 1/15 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL Request for Final Plat Approval NORPOINT HEIGHTS FINAL PLAT Federal Way File No. 16-102863-00-SU Report Date: October 24, 2016 I RECOMMENDATION City of Federal Way staff has reviewed the final plat ofNorpoint Heights for compliance with preliminary plat conditions and all applicable codes and policies, and recommends approval of the final plat application. II INTRODUCTION LUTC Meeting Date: November 7, 2016 Request: Description: Owner: Surveyor: Location: Sewage Disposal: Request for final plat approval for the Norpoint Heights subdivision. Norpoint Heights is a proposed 14-lot single-family subdivision on approximately 3.04 acres. The preliminary plat ("Norpoint Heights") was granted approval by the Federal Way City Council on April 6, 2010, per City Council Resolution 10-580. Access to the Norpoint Heights plat is from Norpoint Way NE at the 35300 Block, generally along the city's west border. Norpoint Way NE is a public roadway in northeast Tacoma. All required roads, sidewalks, storm drainage facilities, sewer lines, water lines, and related improvements for the project have been constructed or financially guaranteed. Homes By Landmark, Inc., David Litowitz PO Box 26116 Federal Way, WA 98093 253-927-6116 Jonathan Becker Duncanson Company, Inc. 145 SW 155th Street, #102 Burien, WA 98166 206-244-4141 The subject property is located in the City of Federal Way, adjacent to the westerly City limits line at the 35300 Block of Norpoint Way NE. (Exhibit A -Vicinity Map.) Lakehaven Utility District 12 Water Supply: Fire District: School District: Report Prepared By: Lakehaven Utility District South King Fire and Rescue Federal Way School District Jim Harris, Planner III HISTORY AND BACKGROUND The 14-lot Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat was granted approval by the Federal Way City Council on April 6, 2010, per Resolution 10-580. The 3.04-acre subdivision includes public right-of-way dedication for roadways, and includes dedication of a public storm drainage facility tract (Tract C), (Exhibit B - Final Plat Map). City Council Resolution 10-580 was later amended by City Council Resolution 12-616 on March 6, 2012, which modified the approved clearing and grading plans. The zoning for the northern portion of the site is RS 7.2 with a minimum permitted lot size of 7,200 square feet, and the southern portion of the site is zoned RS 5.0 with a minimum permitted lot size of 5,000 square feet. The lots in the Norpoint Heights plat meet the minimum lot size for the applicable underlying zoning designations, and the lot sizes range from 5,001 square feet to 9,120 square feet. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.140(3), the Norpoint Heights preliminary plat approval is valid for seven years from the date of the preliminary plat approval. The final plat application was submitted to the City and deemed complete within seven years of the date of preliminary plat approval. The applicant applied for engineering plan approval on December 13, 2010. Engineering plan approval (Notice to Proceed) was granted by the City on April 27, 2015, and site work commenced shortly thereafter. The developer applied for final plat approval on June 10, 2016, while the site was still under construction. Improvements are now substantially complete and the final plat application was deemed complete on October 3, 2016. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.110 and Federal Way City Code (FWCC) 20-136, the City Council is charged with determining whether: 1) the proposed final plat conforms to all terms of the preliminary plat approval and subsequent approved modifications; 2) the subdivision meets the requirements of all applicable state laws and local ordinances which were in effect at the time of preliminary plat approval; 3) all taxes and assessments owing on the property have been paid; and 4) all required improvements have been made or sufficient security has been accepted by the city. City of Federal Way staff has reviewed the Norpoint Heights final plat for compliance with preliminary plat conditions and all applicable codes and policies. All applicable codes, policies, and plat conditions have been met or financially secured as allowed by FWCC 20-135. A proposed resolution of the City of Federal Way, Washington, to approve the final plat ofNorpoint Heights is attached (Exhibit C). Norpoint Heights Staff Report for Request for Final Plat Approval 13 File #16-102863/Doc ID 74726 Page 2 of6 IV COMPLIANCE WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONS The following lists conditions of preliminary plat approval (Resolution 10-580). Required improvements have been completed or financially secured as allowed by FWCC 20-135 and identified by staff response following each condition. Planning Conditions: 1. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant must submit to the City of Federal Way the fee-in-lieu of open space, calculated on 15 percent of the most recent assessed value of the property at the time of final plat. Staff Response: This condition will be met prior to plat recording. The plat map shows and the applicant has provided some usable open space on-site as allowed by FWRC. Specifically Tracts A and Bare landscape tracts totaling 1,599 square feet of buffer open space, and Tract Fis a 1,106 square-foot usable open space tract for a pedestrian connection. Therefore, a total of two percent of the required open space is being provided on site, and the applicant has opted to pay the remaining 13 percent of the assessed land value to fulfill the FWRC required open space as fee-in-lieu of on- site open space. The assessed land value from 2016 King County Assessors records is $159,000.00. The applicant shall pay the city a total of $20,670.00 in lieu of providing required usable open space on site. ($159,000.00 X .13 = $20,670.00). 2. A copy of the Homeowners Association (HOA)/Covenant Agreement must be recorded prior to recording of the plat. The HOA/Covenant Agreement must contain language which governs the responsibility of owning/maintaining common landscaping tracts along Norpoint Way NE and the non-public landscaping tract in and around the stormwater detention facility. Staff Response: This condition will be met with plat recording. The owner has provided a copy of draft HOA covenants that will be recorded concurrent with the plat recording. The final plat map includes notes that govern ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the landscape tracts along Norpoint Way NE, which will be owned and maintained by the HOA, and the storm drainage pond tract which is being dedicated for ownership and maintenance by the City of Federal Way. 3. The power easement for Puget Sound Energy (PSE) that runs north/south along the eastern portion of the proposed preliminary plat must be shown on the final recorded plat. Additionally, the buildable areas of each lot shall be shown outside of the easement. Staff Response: This condition has been met. The PSE easement and the building envelopes for each lot are depicted on the final plat map. Public Works Conditions: I . Pedestrian improvements to assure safe walking conditions to school bus stops as detailed in the School Access Analysis. Final location and design of the school access path shall be approved by the Federal Way School District and<Federal Way Public Works Department prior to issuance of construction permits for infrastructure improvements. Norpoint Heights Staff Report for Request for Final Plat Approval 14 File #16-102863/Doc ID 74726 Page 3 of6 Staff Response: This condition has been met. The Public Works Department approved engineering plans for the plat infrastructure construction including walking areas for school access in early 2015. All students from this plat will be served by busses in the Madrona Trails neighborhood, near the intersection of 2i11 Ave SW and SW 351'1 St. Students have been provided a safe walking route from the plat, utilizing an existing sidewalk along Norpoint Way NE within the City of Tacoma (Norpoint Way NE is a City of Tacoma right-of-way), and a new sidewalk that connects the Norpoint Way sidewalk to the existing sidewalk along 2i" Ave SW The new sidewalks have been constructed and accepted by the City of Tacoma and the Federal Way Public Works Department. 2. Design of the stormwater drainage pond shall be consistent with the conceptual design presented in Exhibit 0. In addition, the stormwater drainage pond shall be subject to the following: • It must be demonstrated through final engineering design and review process that the design meets all design criteria for public ponds, per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). • The City will accept the pond for operations and maintenance, after final plat recording and upon successful completion of the City Code required post construction two-year maintenance period. • Approval/agreement from the property owner(s) on the north side of the pond, for a wall to be constructed on that adjacent property, and any walls built on parcels/property other than within the pond tract will be owned and maintained by those adjacent property owners. • Third party structural review /approval of all walls associated with the pond. • Walls to meet design criteria set forth by a Licensed Professional Geotechnical Engineer and third party review will be required. Staff Response: This condition has been met. The Public Works Department approved engineering plans for the plat infrastructure construction in early 2015, and the engineering plans meet the preliminary plat requirements and conditions. Plat infrastructure has been inspected by the Public Works Department during construction, and is now substantially complete. V SEPA In conjunction with the preliminary plat review, the City issued a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Determination ofNonsignificance (DNS) file no. 08-100330-SE, for the proposal on August 12, 2009. The final plat complies with the SEPA DNS. VI DECISIONAL CRITERIA Pursuant to FWCC 20-136, if the City Council finds that the following criteria have been met, the City Council may approve the final plat for recording: 1. The final plat is in substantial conformance to the preliminary plat. Staff Response: This criterion has been met, as the conditions of preliminary plat and SEPA determination have been met or financially guaranteed, and the final plat is in substantial conformance to the preliminary plat. 2. The final plat is in conformity with applicable zoning ordinances or other land use controls. Staff Response: This criterion has been met and/or financially guaranteed. The plat meets the RS 7.2 and RS 5. 0 zoning standards in effect at the time the application was determined to be complete. The Norpoint Heights Staff Report for Request for Final Plat Approval 15 File #16-102863/Doc ID 74726 Page 4 of6 lot sizes exceed the underlying minimum lot size requirement of 7,200 square feet for single-family lots in the RS 7.2 zone in the northern portion of the site, and lots meet the RS 5. 0 designation for those lots in the southern portion of the site. Construction of the plat infrastructure is substantially complete and, as provided in FWRC 20-135, performance and maintenance bonds are in place for the entire plat and off-site improvements. 3. That all conditions of the Hearing Examiner and/or City Council have been satisfied. Staff Response: This criterion has been met as noted in the staff comments above. All plat conditions have been met and/or financially guaranteed. 4. That the public use and interest shall be served by the establishment of the subdivision and dedication by determining if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety, general welfare, open space, drainage ways, streets and roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school. Staff Response: This criterion has been met. The final plat is consistent with applicable zoning and subdivision regulations and ensures the public health, safety, and welfare is protected. The plat infrastructure has been installed and/or adequately financially guaranteed as discussed above, including: safe walking routes to school bus stops; provisions for open space; drainage system installation; water system installation; sewer system installation; and street improvements. In order to meet the City's transportation concurrency standards that were applicable at the time of the preliminary plat review and approval, prior to recording the plat, the applicant must pay the City a pro-rata traffic fee of $18,433.00 to address any failures in the City's Level of Service (LOS) standard. In order to meet the City's adopted open space requirements that were applicable at the time of the preliminary plat review and approval, prior to recording the plat, the applicant must pay the City an open space fee in-lieu of$20,670.00. 5. That all required improvements have been made and maintenance bonds or other security for such improvements have been submitted and accepted. Staff Response: This criterion has been met. All road and storm drainage improvements for Norpoint Heights have been constructed and a maintenance bond is in effect. In addition, sewer and water lines have been installed and approved by Lakehaven Utility District as identified in the letter of substantial completion from Lakehaven Utility District dated September 27, 2016. 6. That all taxes and assessments owing on the property being subdivided have been paid. Staff Response: Prior to being recorded, the plat is reviewed by the King County Department of Assessments to ensure that all taxes and assessments have been paid. Norpoint Heights Staff Report for Request for Final Plat Approval 16 File #16-102863/Doc ID 74726 Page 5 of6 VII CONCLUSION Based on site visits, review of the final plat maps, construction drawings, and the project file, staff has determined that the application for final plat approval for Norpoint Heights meets all platting requirements ofRCW 58.17.110 and FWCC 20-136. Plat infrastructure improvements have been substantially completed and/or financially secured to guarantee that all plat conditions and code requirements will be completed as allowed by FWCC 20-135 . The project has been developed in conformance with Resolution 10-580 and Resolution 12-616, approving the Norpoint Heights Preliminary Plat. A recommendation of final plat approval is therefore being forwarded to the City Council for approval. VIII EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Norpoint Heights Vicinity Map for Norpoint Heights Reduced Copy (8Yi x 11) ofNorpoint Heights Final Plat Map Resolution of the City of Federal Way, Washington, Approving the Norpoint Heights Final Plat Staff Report for Request for Final Plat Approval File #16-102863/Doc ID 74726 Page 6 of6 17 r Norpoint Heights Final Plat Vicinity Map s: 1·--·---, -•Cf.? I ' Cl) I > <{ -en 200 0 200 400 Feet .... ·. N 18 EXHJRI T_ 8 + · PAGE I OF_! _ NORPOINT HEIGHTS A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 AND THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/ 4 OF SEC 25, T 21 N, R 3 E, W.M., CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DEDICATION KNOW All PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE. THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS OF INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREBY SUBDIVIDED. HEREBY DECLARE THIS PLAT TO BE THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE SUBDIVISION MADE HEREBY, ANO DO HERESY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY FOR THE USE OF THE PUBLIC FOREVER All STREETS AND AVENUES NOT SHOWN AS PRIVATE HEREON AND DEDICATE THE USE Tl-lEREOF FOR ALL PUBLIC PURPOSES NOT INCONSISTENT WITH THE USE THEREOF FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY PURPOSES. AND ALSO THE RIGHT TO MAKE All NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS AND FILLS UPON THE LOTS ANO TRACTS SHOWN HEREON IN THE ORIGINAL REASONABLE GRADING OF SAID STREETS ANO AVENUES. AND FURTHER DEDICATE TO THE USE OF THE PUBLIC All THE EASEMENTS ANO TRACTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT FOR All PUBLIC PURPOSES AS INDICATED HEREON. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PARKS, OPEN SPACE. UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE UNLESS SUCH EASEMENTS OR TRACTS AR[ SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED ON THIS PLAT AS BEING DEDICATED OR CONVEYED TO A PERSON OR ENTITY OTHER THAN THE PUBLIC, IN WHICH CASE WE DO HER(B'r DEDICATE AND CONVEY SUCH STREETS, EASEMENTS, OR TRACTS TO THE PERSON OR ENTITY IOENTiflEO ANO FOR THE PURPOSE STATED, FURTHER, THE UNDERSICNED OWNERS OF THE LANO SUBDIVIDED HEREBY, WAIVE FOR THEMSELVE S. THEIR HEIRS AND ASSIGNS ANO ANY PERSON OR ENTITY DERIVlNG TITLE FROM THE UNDERSIGNED. ANY ANO ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES AGAINST THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS WHICH MAY BE OCCASIONED BY THE DESIGN. ESTABLISHMENT. CONSTIRUCTION. OPERATION. FAILURE TO OPERATE. OR MAINTENANCE OF ROADS AND/OR DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. ALTERATIONS OF THE GROUND SURFACE, VEGETATION, DRAINAGE OR SURFACE OR SUBSURFACE WATER FLOWS IMTHIN THIS SUBDIVlSION OR V.,THIN ANY DRAINAGE OR DETENTION FACILITIES DESIGNED TO RECEIVE OR AC TU All Y RECEIVlNG ORAJNAGE FROM THE SUBDIVISIONS ANO THE CJTY OF FEDERAL WA V'S REVIEW ANO APPROVAL OF PLANS ANO PERMITS FOR SAM[ OTHER THAN CLAIMS RESULTING FROM INADEQUATE MAINTENANCE BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY , APPROVALS DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS EXAMINED ANO APPROVED THIS DAY OF ------• 20 __ , PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EXAMINED ANO APPROVED THIS __ DAY OF ------• 20 __ • DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNC IL EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF ------• 20 __ • MAYOR Of FEDERAL WAY ATTEST: CITY CLERK KING COUNTY DEPAATI.ENT OF ASSESSMEl'ITS EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS --DAY or • 20 • VOUPG FURTHER, THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS OF THE LAND SUBDIVIDED HEREBY, AGREE FOR THEMS ELVES. THEIR HEIRS ANO ASSIGNS TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS ANO DEFEND THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, ITS SUCCESSORS ANO ASSIGNS, FROM AND AGAINST ANY DAMAGE, INCLUDING ANY COSTS OF DEFENSE. CLAIMED BY PERSONS WITIHIN OR WITHOUT THE SUBOIVJSIONS TO HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THE DESIGN. ESTABLISHMENT, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION. FAILURE TO OPERATE, OR MAINTENANCE or ROADS AND/OR DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, ALTERATIONS OF THE GROUND SURFACE, VEGETATION, DRAINAGE OR SURFACE OR SUBSURFACE WATER FLOWS V.,THIN THIS SUBDIV1SION OR V.,THIN ANY DRAINAGE OR DETENTION FACILITIES DESIGNED TO RECEIVE OR ACTUALLY RECEIVING DRAINAGE FROM THE SUBDIVISIONS AND THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY'S REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF PLANS AND PERMITS FOR SAME. PROVIDED. THIS WAIVER ANO INDEMNIFICATION SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS RELEASING THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS. FROM LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES. INCLUDING THE COST OF DEFENSE. RESULTING FROM AND TO THE EXTENT OF THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE Cl TY OF FEDERAL WAY, ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS KING COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPUTY KING COUNTY ASSESSOR THIS SUBDIVISION, DEDICATION, INDEMNIFICATION OF CLAIMS AND AGREEMENT TO HOLD HARMLESS IS MADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF SAID OWNERS ACCOUNT NUMBER __ ..;2,c5,c2:..1'-'Q'-',3'---'9"-'0:..48=--- KING COU'ifY ANANCE DIVISION CERTIACAlE IN WITNESS WHEREOF Yv1::. SE T OUR HANDS ANO SEALS. HOMES BY LANDMARK. INC , FIRST DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL PROPERTY TAXES ARE PAID, THAT THERE ARE NO DELINQUENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFIED TO THIS OFFICE FOR COLLECTION AND THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFIED TO THIS OFflCE FOR COLLECTION ON ANY OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN CONTAINED. DEDICATED AS STREETS, ALLEYS OR FOR ANY OTHER PUBLIC USE, ARE PAID IN FULL B~ B~ = I~ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS STATE OF _____ ~ )SS COUNTY OF ____ __, I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT==========-===~ SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT, ON OATH STATED THAT (HE/SHE) WASAUTHORJZEO TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT ANO ACKNOWLEDGED IT AS THE T=o=aE=-T=H""E"'F=R=E=E..,.AN"'o=-v"'o"'c"'"u"'N=TA"'R""Y"A""c"'T""o"'F""s"'uc"'H"'"P""A"'R=TY 0 :oR THE USES ANO PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THE INSTRUMENT. DATED _____________ _ SIGNATURE OF NOTARY PUBLIC ___________ _ PRINTED NAM E ------------ TITLE ______________ _ MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES -------- STATE OF _____ _, )SS COUNlY OF ____ ~ TH IS __ OAY OF 20_ MANAGER. FINANCE DIVISION DEPUTY r ··,-~·r ·~ f-·+ +---t ·-! ~ _l +.i.~ I I L . ___ f_ _J ~Ti~:ci~~~~:~~i,~vgA~ 1 ~{:TcEToo:~~~ 1 ~~~~~>T~~°"A"uT"'HO=R"'iz=E=o-=r=o-=E"'xE=c=-u=T=E-=T,.,HE=1N=s=rn=u"M-,,E"'N"'T- AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT AS THE TO BE THE FREE ANO VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH PARTv°:o''R"'TIHE=..,.USE=s=-A"'N°"O:-:P::,llRP==os=e=s:-:M-cE=-N"'T°'1o""N"'E=o"1N"'T"H"E-- INSTRUMENT EXt-,! ! fUT~--..-- DATED _____________ _ SIGNATURE OF NOTARY PUBUC ___________ _ PRINTED NAME------------ TITLE ______________ _ MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES -------- CITY OF FEDER AL WAY FILE NO 16-102863-0 0-SU LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIACATE PAG E \ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT OF NQRPQINT HEIGHTS IS BASED UPON AN ACTUAL SURVEY AND SUBDIVISION OF SECTION ~ TOWNSHIP Zl NORTH, RANGE Q,l EAST, WM., THAT THE COURSES AND DISTANCES ARE SHOWN CORRECTLY THEREON; THAT THE MONUMENTS V.,LL BE SET ANO THE LOT ANO BLOCK CORNERS V.,Ll BE STAKED CORRECTLY ON THE GROUND AS CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETEO AND THAT I HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH THE PROVISIONS OF TH[ PLATTING REGULATIONS. JONATHAN MARLO BECKER. PLS -CERTIFICATE NO . 41277 DUNCANSON COMPANY, INC . 145 SW 155TH STREET. STE. 102 SEA TTL[, WASHINGTON 96166 PHONE: (206) 244-4141 RECORDER 'S CERTIFICATE LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Recording No~--------------- Filed for ccoorc;1m'i• d,,rfof 20 •t ___ M inbook ___ of P1,-t1. at page __ _ This map correctly represents a survey made ~ me or under my direction in conformance with the requiremen1s of !he Survey • DUN ~,,e,.~_SON Recording Act at the requesl ol ___ i, __ , 20_ OWN, BY Mg, Supt of Records Certificate No 41277 CHKD BY Clfa!IL ENGINEERING SURVEYING LAND PLANNING 1./5 SIV J.Uth S1re,,1, S111.102, S,mul~. IV.uhingl<H1 Pl.'106 PhuM: (106} U.J../J./1 Fnx: {206} U./-.J-J,fJ LAC DATE 06/3112016 SHEET JMB JOBNO. 10533 1 OF 4 < 0 C ""CJ Gl VOVPG NORPOINT HEIGHTS A PORTION OF TI-iE NW 1/ 4 OF THE NE 1/ 4 AND TI-iE NE 1/ 4 OF THE NW 1/ 4 OF SEC 25, T 21 N, A 3 E, W.M., CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON NOTES 1) THE NORPOINT HEKlHTS HOME O~ERS ASSOQATION (HEREINAFTER "HOME01',NERS ASSOCIATION ") WAS ESTABLISHED ON , THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION ARE ON FILE WITH THE ST A TE OF WASHINGTON IN OLYMPIA. 2) A "TRACT" IS LAND RESERVED FOR SPECIFIED USES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO. RE SERVE TRACTS, RECREATION, OPEN SPACE. SENSITl\1£ AREAS , SURFACE WATER RETENTION, UTILITY FACILITIES AND ACCESS TRACTS ARE NOT C0NS1D£RE0 LOTS OR BUILDING SITES FOR PURPOSES OF RESIDENTIAL DWfLLING CONSTRUCTION , J) TRACT "A" IS A LANDSCAPE TRACT TO BE CONVEYED TO ANO MAINTAINED BY THE HO~EOWNERS ASSOCIATION UPON RECORDING OF THIS PLAT. REMOVAL OR DISTURBANCE OF LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE TRACT IS PROHIBITED , EXCEPT AS NECESSARY FOR MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING PLANTINGS A PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS THE ENTIRE TRACT SHALL BE GRANTED TO LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT UPON RECORDING, SEE "LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT EASEMENT" NOTE ON THIS SHEET. 4) TRACT "B" IS A LANDSCAPE TRACT TO BE CONVEYED TO AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION UPON RECORDING OF THIS PLAT. REMOVAL OR DISTURBANCE OF LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE TRACT IS PROHIBITED, EXCEPT AS NECESSARY FOR MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING PLANTINGS A PRIVATE SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS THE ENTIRE TRACT FOR THE BENEFIT OF KING COUNTY TAX PARCEL N2521039062 SHALL BE GRANTED TO THE OWNER OF SAID KING COUNTY TAX PARCEL ~2521039062 UPON RECORDING, SEE "PRIVATE SEWER EASEMENT" NOTE ON THIS SHEET S) TRACT "C" IS A STORM DRAINAGE TRACT TO BE CON\/£YED TO AND MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY UPON RECORDING Of THIS PLAT REMOVAL OR DISTURBANCE OF LANDSCAPING V.,THIN THE TRACT IS PROHIBITED, EXCEPT AS NECESSARY FOR MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING PLANTINGS ANO AS APPRO\/£D BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 6) TRACT "D" IS A UTILITY TRACT TO BE CONVEYED TO ANO MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION UPON RECORDING OF THIS PLAT, A WATER EASEMENT ACROSS THE ENTIRE TRACT SHALL BE GRANTED TO LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT UPON RECORDING OF THIS PLAT. SE[ "LAKEHA\/£N UTILITY DISTRICT EASEMENT" NOTE ON THIS SHEET. 7) TRACT "E" IS A PRIVATE DRIVEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY TRACT TO BE CONVEYED TO ANO MAINTAINED BY THE OWNERS OF THE LOTS BEING SERVED SY THIS EASEMENT UPON RECORDING OF THIS PLAT. TRACT T ALSO CONTAINS A NON-MOTORIZED PATH AND PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT TO BE GRANTED TO THE PUBLIC UPON RECORDING OF THIS PLAT. A PUBLIC WATER AND PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS THE ENTIRE TRACT SHALL BE GRANTED TO LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT UPON RECORDING OF THIS PLAT, SEE "LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT EASEMENT" NOTE ON THIS SHEET. B) TRACT "F" IS AN OPEN SPACE AND PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY TRACT TO BE CONVEYED TO AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION UPON RECORDING OF THIS PLAT. TRACT "F'' ALSO CONTAINS AN EASEMENT. GRANTED TO THE PUBLIC UPON RECORDING OF THIS PLAT FOR ACCESS ACROSS THE PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY. A PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT ACROSS Tl-lE ENTIRE TRACT SHALL BE GRANTED TO LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT UPON RECORDING OF THIS PLAT, SEE "LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISlRICT EASEMENT" NOTE ON THIS SHEET. 9) ALL WATERLINE EASEMENTS AND SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS DEPICTED HEREON ARE HEREBY RESERVED FOR AND CONVEYED TO LAKEHA\/£N UTILITY DISTRICT FDR THE PURPOSE OF SERVING THIS SUBDIVISION ANO OTHER PROPERTY Willi WATER AND SANITARY SERVICE, 10) ALL ORIVEWA YS MUST BE SET BACK A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 25 FEET FROM ADJACENT INTERSECTIONS 11) BUILDING SETBACKS ARE AS FOLLOWS, FRONT = 20', SIDE • 5 ' ANO REAR = 5' FROM THE PROPERTY LINES, OR AS OTHERWISE RESTRICTED BY EASEMENT, ANO WILL HEREINAFTER BE REFERRED TO AS "BSBL ". 12 ) STREET TREES, PLANTER STRIPS AND CUL-DE-SAC LANDSCAPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION , 13) SIDE SEWER STUBS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED V.,TH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MAIN SEWER SYSTEM , THE INVERT ELEVATIONS OF THOSE PIPES WILL DETERMINE THE MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION REQUIRED TO OBTAIN GRAVITY FLOW INTO THE MAIN SEWER SYSTEM . THE PLANS ON FILE WITH LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO COMMENCING DESIGN DRAWINGS FOR ANY FUTURE DE\/£LOPMENT ON THE LOTS SHOWN HEREON . 14) DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF ANY LOT WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, STUB-OUT INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR STORM DRAINAGE SHOULD BE VERIFIED BY THE INDIVIDUAL LOT BUILDER OR 01',NER TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY SLOPE FROM THE PROPOSED HOUSE. 15) ALL PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENTS DEPICTED HEREON ACROSS THE NORTHERLY 10-FEET OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 5, THE EASTERLY 10-FEET Of' LOTS 6 ANO 7, THE EASTERLY 5-FEET OF LOTS 8 THROUGH 10. THE WESTERLY 5-FEET OF LDTS 11 ANO 12 ANO THE SOUTH 10-FEET OF LOTS 12 THROUGH 14 ARE PRIVATE AND ARE HEREBY CONVEYED TO THE LOT O~ERS WHO BENEFIT FROM THE EASEMENT. THE 01',NERS OF SAID LOTS SHALL BE EQUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE, REPAIR ANO REPLACEMENT OF THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES WITHIN THE EASEMENT. NO GRADING OR OTHER INTRUSION SHALL BE ALLOWED IN SAID EASEMENT AREA. 16) ALL BUILDING 001',NSPOUTS, FOOTING DRAINS, AND ORAINS FROM ALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES SUCH AS PATIOS ANO DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE PERMANENT STORM DRAIN g~~L;JT~s ~~ 0c~y 0~r ~~~Ef:CR~~D Ei!,~~EPEL~~G s~~~~se~E~~~~l~~Eo1~.;es1~~-22;t,~A ~1'6,, FOR ANY BUILDING PERMIT ALL CONNECTIONS OF THE DRAINS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVAL. FOR THOSE LOTS THAT ARE DESIGNATED FOR INDIVIDUAL LOT INFILTRATION SYSTEMS , THE SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE TIME OF THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL PLANS ON FILE. ALL INDIVIDUAL STUB-OUTS AND INFILTRATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE LOT OWNER , AT A MINIMUM, PERFORATED STUB-OUT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED. 17) WATER SERVICE TO LOTS 7, 9, 10 AND 11 MUST BE MADE WITHIN THE 10-FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (SEE EASEMENT PROVISIONS. THIS SHEET). 1B) ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ON THE LOTS CONTAINED HEREIN SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE V.,TH THE RECOMMENDATIONS MADE IN GEOTECH REPORT PREPARED BY GEORESOURCES, LLC EASEMENT PROVISIONS AN EASEMENT IS HEREBY RESERVED FOR AND CONVEYED TO PUGET SOUND ENERGY (GAS), TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES/TACOMA POWER, CENTURYUNK TELEPHONE COMPANY, COMCAST CABLE COMPANY, LAKEHAV(N UTILITY DISTRICT, OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS ANO l'HEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS ANO ASSIGNS ANO THE 01',NERS OF LOTS 7, 9, 10 AND 11 FOR PRIVATE WATER SERVICES, UNDER THE EXTERIOR 10 FEET OF ALL LOTS, TRACTS AND SPACES WITHIN THE PLAT LYING PARALLEL WITH ANO ADJOINING ALL STREET(S), ALONG THE EAST ANO WE ST SIOES OF TRACT E ANO AS SHOl',N ON LOTS 3, 4, 11 ANO 12; IN WHICH TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE . MAINTAIN, REPAIR, REPLACE AND ENLARGE UNDERGROUND F'IPES. CONDUITS, CABLES AND WIRES 'MTH ALL NECESSARY OR CONVENIENT UNOERGROUNO OR GROUND-MOUNTING APPURTENANCES THERETO FOR THE PURPOSE OF SERVING THIS SUBDIVISION ANO OTHER PROPERTY WITH ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE, TELEVISION AND OTHER UTILITY SERVICE, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON STREETS, LOTS, TRACTS AND SPACES AT ALL TIMES FOR THE PURPOSES STATED. THESE EASEMENTS ENTERED UPON FOR THESE PURPOSES SHALL BE RESTORED AS NEAR AS POSSIBLE TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION BY THE UTILITY OR LOT 01',NERS OF LOTS 7, 9, 1D ANO 11 WITH RESPECT TO PRIVATE WATER SERVICES , CITY OF FEDERAL WAY FILE NO . 16-102863·00-SU LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT EASEMENT: AN EASEMENT IS HEREBY IRREVOCABLY RESERVED FOR AND GRANTED TO LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT AND ITS AGENTS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, FOR SO LONG AS IT SHALL OWN AND MAINTAIN Tl-iE UTILITIES REFERENCED HEREIN UNDER AND UPON lHE AREA SHOWN ON THE PLAT ANO DESCRIBED HEREIN AS "LAKEHA\/£N WATER EASEMENT" (WE ) TO INSTALL, MAINTAIN, REPLACE, REPAIR ANO OPERATE WATER MAJNS AND APPURTENAN CES f'OR THIS SUBDIVISION AND OTHER PROPERTY AND "LAKEHAVEN SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT" (SSE) TO INSTALL, MAINTAIN, REPLACE , REPAIR AND OPERA TE SEWER MAINS ANO APPURTENANCES FOR THI S SUBDIVISION AND OTHER PROPERTY TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON SAID EASEMENT AT ALL TIMES FOR PURPOSES INCIDENT THERET04 NO BUILDING, WALL , ROCKERY. FENCE , TREES OR STRUCTURE Of ANY KIND SHALL BE ERECTED OR PLANTED, NOR SHALL ANY FILL MATERIAL BE PLACED V.,THIN THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID EASEMENT AREA. NO EXCAVATION SHALL BE MADE V.,THIN THREE (3) FEET OF SAIO WATER OR SEWER SERVICE FACILITIES AND THE SURFACE LE\/£L OF THE GROUNO V.,IHIN THE EASEMENT AREA SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT THE ELEVATION AS CURRENTLY EXISTING GRANTOR HEREBY AGREES THAT NO WATER OR SE¥/ER SYSTEM FACILITY OR APPURTENANCE OF ANY KIND SHALL BE CON S TRUCTED OR LOCATED BY GRANTOR, OR ANY THIRD PARTY ACTING UNDER AUTHORITY OF GRANTOR, "'THIN OR PROXIMATE TO SAID EASEMENT, UNLESS SU CH IN S TALLATION IS APPROVED BY GRANTEE ANO IS IN CONFORMANCE "'TH THE THEN-CURRENT EDITION OF THE -CRITERIA FOR SEWAGE WORKS DESIGN" PUBLISHED BY THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY. GRANTOR HEREBY FURTHER AGREES THAT NO OTHER UTILITY FACILITY OR APPURTENANCE OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS, SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OR LOCATED BY GRANTOR, OR ANY THIRO PARTY ACTING UNDER AUTHORITY OF GRANTOR, V.,THIN THREE FEET (3'), MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FOR PARALLEL ALIGNMENTS, OR V.,THIN SIX INCHES (6"). MEASURED VERTICALLY FOR CROSSING OR PERPENDICULAR ALIGNMENTS, OF ANY PORTION OF THE GRANTEE'S FACILITIES. GRANTOR ADDITIONALLY GRANTS TO THE LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT AND ITS AGENTS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS THE USE OF SUCH ADDITIONAL AREA IMMEDIA TELY ADJACENT TO SAID EASEMENT AREA AS SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION. RECONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF SAID WATER AND SEWER FAOLITIES THE USE OF SUCH ADDITIONAL AREA SHALL BE HELD TO A REASONABLE MINIMUM AND BE RETURNED TO THE CONDITION EXISTING IMMEDIATELY BEFORE THE PROPERTY WAS ENTERED UPON BY THE LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT, ITS AGENTS, SUCCESSORS ANO ASSIGNS. IN ADDITION TO THE OTHER RE STRICTIONS HEREIN , GRANTOR SHALL NOT CONVEY TO A THIRD PARTY ANY EASEMENT OR OTHER INTEREST OR RIGHT OF USE OF PROPERTY SUBJECT 10 THE EASEMENT THAT WOULD IMPAIR OR LIMIT THE USE OF THE EASEMENT RIGHTS GRANTED HEREIN, PAIVA TE SEWER EASEMENT: AN EASEMENT IS HEREBY RESERVED FOR AND GRANTED TO THE 01',NER OF TAX PARCEL #2521039062 FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITY PURPOSES THROUGH, OV[R, AND ACROSS TRACT 8, HEREON . THE GRANTEE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT, "'THOUT PRIOR NOTICE TO GRANTOR, TO INSTALL, REPAIR. RECONSTRUCT, OPERATE ANO/OR MAINTAIN GRANTEES FACILITIES V.,THIN SAID EASEMENT, ANO TO ENTER UPON SAID REAL PROPERTY V.,THOUT INCURRING ANY LEGAL OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY. THE GRANTEE AGREES THAT ANY EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS ON SAID REAL PROPERTY THAT MAY BE DISTURBED OR DESTROYED BY GRANTEES FACILITIES OR ACTIVITIES RELATED TO SUCH FACILITIES. V.,LL BE REPLACED, REPAIRED, OR OTHERV.,SE RESTORED AS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE. TO THE PRE-EVENT CONDITION BY AND AT GRANTEES EXPENSE PUGET SOUND ENERGY AGREEMENT PSE OPERATES AND MAINTAINS A TRANSMISSION LINE ACROSS THE UNDERLYING PROPERTY (EASEMENT AREA) AS LISTED ON SHEET 3 ANO DELINEA TEO ON SHEET 4, HEREON. AN AGREEMENT EXISTS BETWEEN PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC (PSE) AND LANDMARK HOMES, INC {01',NER) TO UTILIZE PORTIONS OF THE EASEMENT AREA FOR , CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC ROADWAY ANO UTILITIES, LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT UTILITIES, ANO ADJACENT PROPERTY O'M'JER ACCESS ANO MAINTENANCE OF CONCRETE DRIVEWAY TO HOUSE, LAl',N, ANO STREET TREES, THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS APPLY, BUT 00 NOT REPRESENT A COMPLETE LIST -PLEASE REFER TO ACTUAL RECORDED DOCUMENT FOR PARTICULARS, 1) IF SUCH USE BECOMES A HAZARD TO PSE'S FACILITIES (BOTH EXISTING AND FUTURE), THE 01',NER V.,LL BE REQUIRED TO CORRECT SUCH HAZARD AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE 2) NO GRADING WITHIN THE EASEMENT AREA SHALL REDUCE THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE GROUND ANO "'RES ANO NO EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERMITTED "'THIN SD-FEET OF PSE POLES ANO ANCHORS. THE 01',NER MUST PAY FOR ALL COSTS RELATED TO CHANGING THE VERTICAL LINE CLEARANCES AS A RESULT OF THEIR USE J) A MINIMUM CLEARANCE OF 20-FEET FROM ALL POWER LINES MUST BE OBSERVED AND NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SHALL BE BUil T "'THIN THE EASEMENT AREA. ANY PSE ANCHORS CANNOT BE COVERED 4) EASEMENT SHALL NOT BE USED FOR THE STORAGE OF FLAMABLE OR VOLATILE MATERIAL OR THE PLACEMENT OF ANY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLO"'NG, DECKS, PA nos, AND OUT BUILDINGS OF' ANY KIND OR NATURE . ~) AT NO TIME SHALL PSE'S ACCESS TO THEIR FACILITIES WITHIN THE EASEMENT AREA BE PERMANENTLY BLOCKED OFF OR UNDULY RESTRICTED -AT ALL TIMES PSE f.lUST HAVE A MINIMUf.l WORKING CLEARANCE OF 15-FEET. NO FENCES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED V.,THIN THE EASEMENT AREA AND LANDSCAPING MUST NOT INTERFERE WITH PSE'S ACCESS 6) PSE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO CONTROL , ON A CONTINUING BASIS AND BY ANY PRUDENT ANO REAS0NA8LE MEANS, THE ESTABLISHMENT ANO GROWTH Of BRUSH, TREES ANO OTHER VEGETATION UPON THE EASEMENT AREA WHICH CREATE A HAZARD TO PSE 'S SYSTEMS 7) PSE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO CUT, TRIM , REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ANY TREES LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OUTSIDE THE EASEMENT AREA . WHICH COULD, IN PSE'S SOLE JUDGMENT, INTERFERE WITH OR CREATE A HAZARD TO PSE'S SYSTEMS. PRIOR TO THE EXERCISE Of SUCH RIGHTS, PSE SHALL MAKE A REASONABLE EFFORT TO GIVE OWNER PRIOR NOTICE THAT SUCH TREES WILL BE CUT, TRIMMED. REMOVED OR DISPOSED OF (EXCEPT IN EMERGENCY CONDITIONS), OWNER SHALL BE ENTITLED TO NO COMPENSATION FOR TREES CUT, TRIMMED, REMOVED OR DISPOSED OF EXCEPT FOR THE ACTUAL MARKET VALUE OF MERCHANTABLE TIMBER (IF ANY) CUT ANO REM0\/£0 FROM THE PROPERTY BY PS[. 8) ALL SHRUBS ANO TREES TO BE SITUATED IN THE EASEMENT AREA MUST BE OF A LOW GROWING VARIETY WHICH NORMALLY DO NOT EXCEED FIFTEEN (15) FEET IN HEIGHT AT MATURITY, 9) THE OWNER RELEASES PSE OF LOSS. DAMAGE OR INJURY, WHICH MAY RESULT FROM SUCH USE OF THE EASEMENT AREA, EXCEPT AS RESULTING FROM THE NEGLIGENCE OF PSE OR PSE'S ACENTS OR EMPLOYEES. ANY DAMAGE TO PSE'S FACILITIES CAUSED BY OR RESULTING FROM SUCH USE OF THE EASEMENT AREA MAY BE REPAIRED BY PSE AND CHARGED AGAINST AND P BY THE OWNER . THE OWNER FURTHER AGREES TO -· HARMU:SS P ITS AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES FROM ALL LOSS, OAM N ON WHOMSOC r~E:i/;!;=t1:t: ~~rR ~:~::iTiR~~~~; ~ 1;!i CONTRA s.'~ililioll'illol.l-'-4--- 10) THE 01',NER MUST NOTIFY PSE'S ELECTRIC FlRST REE£(S AT -22.S •. T LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT O L CONS TION , :~~!g ;gvi~c~o~~.s ANO TO COORDINATE THE Of PRO s --.~--- 11) THE TERMS ANO CONDITIONS HEREIN CONTAINED SHALL BE BINDING UPON THE PARTIES HERETO . 20 THEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. • DUN ~ .. !.~SON CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING LAND PLANNING DWN~BY CHKD. BY US SIV J.1JtJi Srnn. St•. 101. Stnlflt, Wruliinstoo t;/13166 Pli011t: (106JU4-.JJJ/ FM: (106Jl""'-.U55 LAC DATE OS/3112016 SHEET JMB JOB NO. 10533 2 OF 4 VOLJPG NORPOINT HEIGHTS A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 AND THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC 25, T 21 N, R 3 E, W.M., CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON LEGAL DESCRIPTION TITLE PER ORDER NO 01146-54687 ISSUED BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, DATED MARCH 22, 2016 THE WEST 447 FEET OF THE EAST 1562 FEET OF THE SOUTH 225 FEET OF THE NORTH 430 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M,, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 1 ACRE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 25. TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, WM, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, WHICH IS 1115 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAtD GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 205 FEET ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAIO GOVERNMENT LOT 1; TI-lENCE WEST 447 FEET ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1 TO A LINE DIVIDING PIERCE AND KING COUNTIES; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COUNTY LINE TO INTERSECT A LINE RUNNING PARALLEL WITH AND 1592 FEET WEST OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 290 FEET. MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT I; TI-lENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 477 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (ALSO KNOWN AS RE\11SED PARCEL B OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT #OB-10DS61-00-SU, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20060613900003). PROCEDURAL STATEMENT THE RELATIVE POSITION OF THE SURVEY MONUMENTS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE BASED ON A NETWORK RTK CPS OBSERVATION TRAVERSE AND A CLOSED LOOP FIELD TRAVERSE, AND ARE REPORTED TO A RELATIVE ACCURACY THAT MEETS OR EXCEEDS A TOLERANCE OF 1:20,000. CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMANCE THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITH A TOPCON QS-3A AND LEICA TS12 ELECTRONIC THEODOLITE READING DIRECT TO 3 SECONDS OF ARC AND MEASURING DISTANCE ±(3+(2PPM X D)) MM NGS BASELINE COMPARED NOVEMBER, 2015_ THIS SURVEY MEETS THE MINIMUM STANDARDS SET FORTH IN WAC 332-130 SURVEY REFERENCE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT ,08-100581-00-SU, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20080613900003 0 ~o· I f'i.PMOt:t~:~::9 r ~ L T 11 IJJ u,w \ ,6 ,.,s· ----:;;-lO ---1 0 s· BSBL (:::':'.) -~ ~ tis LOT 12 10' unurv l 1-C ,;.-t>.i, ti~ EASEMENT DETAIL 1-1 EASEMENT ~.,. "I ,us·S!95J'ta·[ SCALE: 1" -10' 1 ,~ Lp..C~\ EASEMENT DETAIL "", )!'J 353fl0 ~ SCALE: 1" = 10' 5 --( _/ 10' unurr ~zo· EASEMENT _j.--21f 1.0' LOT3 \ ,,.,r '.s' BSBL LOT13 / "8'J.:i.,. --,!'<o/''1; 10· unurr -1' ( EASEMENT - I EASEMENTS ill CORRESPONDS WITH ITEM NUMBER IN 'SCHEDULE B' OF TITLE REPORT, ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT PER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 3139614 AND RE-ASSIGNED PER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 7603050539 AND 20031224000001 -SHOWN ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT PER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO, 3145388 AND RE-ASSIGNED PER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO, 7603DSOS39 AND 20031224000001 ANO PARTIALLY RELEASED PER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9110020906 -SHOWN POWER EASEMENT PER KING COUNTY RECORDING ND. 5973144, BEING A RE-RECORDING OF INSTRUMENT PER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO, 5908764 -SHOWN TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FOR SEWER FACILITIES PER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO , 20031014000175 -EASEMENT VOID UPON COMPLETION OF SEWER PROJECT, NOT SHOWN SEWER AND WATER FACILITIES EASEMENT PER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO , 20031014000176 -SHOWN TERMS ANO CONDITIONS OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20080613900003 -NOTHING TO SHOW ACCESS ANO UTILITY EASEMENT PER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20100329001480 - SHOWN CONSENT FOR USE OF PUGET SOUND ENERGY TRANSMISSION LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ANO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF PER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20120216001309 -AFFECTS THE LOTS ADJACENT TO THE EASEMENT LISTED ABOVE UTILITY SYSTEMS AND GAS EASEMENT PER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20160317000562, BEING A RE-RECORDING OF INSTRUMENT PER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20160128000815 -AFFECTS THE ROADS AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER THIS PLAT BASIS OF BEARING BEARINGS HELD PER REVISED PARCEL B OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT 606-lOOSBl-00-SU, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO, 20060613900003. -:UND 0 UON-:;; P; 9~ I GRAPHIC SCALE !.AK[NA.rN WATER EASEMENT J.60').. 517l)J'fJ :\ L=/4,87' Ra~J $0'~ ~ ( IN FEE. ~ I~ " EX~1tt IT ---"";........+--1' ~\: ..... 4 .,, PAGE "'J.. 2Q'. BSfil. _ O-OJ9'J7'1J'~. -I ~Jr- S19'2l'JJT._.,:._..J,./ --_L_ --....... :!:~> /..f 10· V1'U 1Y /.,1° CASOIENI 58.-SJ'Zn $ 9f .,, I0.00' w ~ l' IS i.i<' --r;rs:,\O<j~~ S89;J'2B"E J' 4 °' u · SW 353RD PLACE ___ L ___ _ LAKEHAVEN EASEMENT DETAIL SCALE: 1" -20' CITY OF FEDERAL WAY FILE NO . 16-102863-00-SU \ f1)UNI) UONUMEN T PER BLA ~ O> "4'§-· -) C~ ~ I ~\~ (0 29TH STREET NE SW 356TH STREET _ SB8~9'.JB:_,I' 6~ _ Q ~ <i, "' FOUND UONUMENT PER BlA ~ ____ J_76.?§' ---~ 517.65' 5B9;5'54·w ----N89~J'15"W ---- MONUMENT NOTE FOUND MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON WERE FIELD LOCATED IN MAY, 2015 AND MAY, 2016 21 ~ DUN ~ .. ! .. ~SON ~VIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING • LAND PLANNING DWN~BY CHKD. BY }.Jj SW 155,lr Strffl, s,~. JOZ. S.X,11/11, IYtuliirigloo t)8JM Ph0r1e: (206)244-4141 Fax.: (206)1.J.J."455 LAC DATE 08131/2016 SHEET JMB JOB NO. 10533 30F4 a C: " " ,,.,.r .... r,1,( PA!'"<L: ,f5L>'::94~"·'.':·,·, .•. NORPOINT HEIGHTS A PORTION OF THE NW 1/ 4 OF THE NE 1/ 4 AND THE NE 1/ 4 OF THE NW 1/ 4 OF SEC 25, T 21 N, R 3 E, W.M., CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON CURVI: IA BL£ UN( TABLE CURVE H lEl'IOru RAO<US oar .. Cl 11.3 7' 151 .00' 04'18'55' C2 37.99' 1s1.oo· 14·24·5 3· Cl 49 .is· 151.00' 18"4J'49 • C4 2-7 67' 12MO n·•o·s •· cs 3.84° 99.00' 02·13•13• C6 46 65" 24.50" 109"05'189 C7 <2.l7' SJ.SO" 4s~·4r cs 60 14' 53_5o· 64"2 2"<:l" C9 36 72 • SJ so· 39·19·1r CIO 4188' 53.50" H 'S1'0 2 CII 2613' 126,00' 12·09·1 2· CT2 15 151 126 00~ 05·53·24· Cl3 20 °02 12s.oo · 09·05·1 s · Cr< 32 ,,. 126.otr 14'37'46" CIS 47 75' 126.0(l' 2 1°42'46" Cl6 3 94 126.00' 01 '47'24" tl7 200 ,2·. 53.-50' 21 <'311'29" C-18 157 95' 126 .00' 11·49·2 r Cl9 30~67" 82.00' 21·25·39· C20 4-UJ' 11 8.00' 21-zs·39• c 2 1 15.23" \1 8 .0 0 ' 07'23°50 " C22 28.90' ua .oo· 14'01'49" C23 14_4r 20.00' 41'26'48" C24 19..J2' 5J..50 ' 20"41'40" C25 12 l~ 12&.00 05 'J2J9 •J •••• LINE H DISTANCE DIRECTION L1 55.65' N44'52°54°W L2· U ,8 1' N 44'52'54"\V LJ 39.61' N44'52'54"W L4 JI 84' N44'52'54"W LS 14 42' N00'5 8'17 "W L6 J0,90' N4$'J9'17"W L7 ,. Jl' N89'5:l 28 W LB 17 17' N89'53'28"W L9 10 42' S89"5T28"E LIO 21 02· 112J'2J'38"W L11 39 47' N42'42"1YW L12 39 42 ' N42"42°13·W L\3 44 gg· S89'J6'01 "E u • J 6 1' S74'20'17"E LIS 31 ,00' N69'32'38~W L16 22 04" 5al'J6 <·1"E LI 7 J!><J' 520'27'22'W L I S 36 oo· N89"01 '43'"E L19 16,00' N89'01 43"E L20 20.00' N89'01'4l"£ L2 1 7,55· S59"S3'2ll"E L22 20.01 S89'36'01 "E L2J .J5.H N20'21'22"E PLAT OF HUMANE WOODS MONUMENT NOTE FOUND MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON WERE FIELD LOCATED IN MAY, 2015 & MAY, T/;"ACr .! tJ CORONACL1 \'Ill AGE ,. I ~~ --T GRAPHIC SCALE "' ... I I ( IN FEET ) l Inch -= 50 fl / ( • DUN~ .. !.~_SON CI VI L ENGINEERING SURVEYING • LAND PLANNING OWN. BY 1-15 SW J JJrh Strul. Ste. /01. Serrltle, Wfl<hinglon rJ,W56 Phnnt: /10t,/U--I---I/-I/ for.· (106)U.J---I--IJJ LAC DATE OB/31/2016 SHEET CITY OF FEDERAL WAY FILE NO , 16-102863-00-SU CHKD. BY JMB JOB NO. 10533 4 OF 4 VOUPO T - COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 15, 2016 ITEM#: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: 21st Avenue S Sidewalk Improvement Project (S 320th Street to S 316th Street) -100% Design Status Report and Authorization to Bid POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council authorize staff to proceed with the bidding of the 21st Avenue S Sidewalk Improvement Project (S 320th Street to S 316th Street) and return to the LUTC and Council for bid award, further reports and authorization. COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee CATEGORY: ~ Consent D City Council Business D Ordinance D Resolution MEETING DATE: November 7, 2016 D D Public Hearing Other STAFF REPORT BY: Christine Mullen, P.E., Street Systems Project Engineer DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Memorandum to Land Use and Transportation Committee dated November 7, 2016 Options Considered: 1. Authorize staff to bid 21st Avenue S Sidewalk Improvement Project (S 320th Street to S 316th Street) and return to the LUTC and Council for bid award, further reports and authorization. 2. Do not authorize staff to proceed with bidding the project and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends Option 1 be forwarded to the Nov Council Consent Agenda · approval. MAYOR APPROVAL: CHIEF OF STAFF: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option 1 to the November 15, 2016 consent agenda for approval. Kelly Maloney, Chair Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member Mark Koppang, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "/ move to authorize staff to bid the 21st Avenue S Sidewalk Improvement Project (S 320th Street to S 316th Street) and return to the LUTC and Council for bid award, further reports and authorization. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED D DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED-1/2015 23 COUNCIL BILL# lsT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION # CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: November 7, 2016 TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor ~ FROM: Marwan Salloum, P.E., Public Works Director~~ Christine Mullen, P.E., Street Systems Project Engineer SUBJECT: 21st Ave S Sidewalk Improvement Project (S 320th Street to S 316th Street) -100% Design Status Report and Authorization to Bid BACKGROUND: This project will install sidewalks on the west side of 21st Ave S from S 320th Street to S 316th Street. This project requires right-of-way acquisition from one parcel. The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. Currently, the project design is 100% complete, which includes the following completed tasks: • Project Design to 100% • Utility Coordination • NEPA/SEP A Approval • Right of Way acquisition process preparation Ongoing Tasks Include: • Final Contract Specifications • Right of Way Finalization PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES: Design Right of Way 2016 Construction Cost 10% Construction Contingency Construction Management TOT AL PROJECT COSTS AVAILABLE FUNDING: Budgeted City Funds $142,350 $330,000* $720,000 $72,000 $103,525 $1,367,875 PSRC Grant (County Wide Non-Motorized -PE & ROW) PSRC Grant (County Wide Non-Motorized -CN) TOT AL AVAILABLE BUDGET $205,000 $397,350 $765,525 $1,367,875 *The City has possession and use for the one strip take acquisition required for this project. Final cost of acquisition has not been finalized a\ this time. Additional funding may be required if the final condemnation price is higher than the appraised value. cc: Project File Day File 24 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 15, 2016 ITEM#: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance System Repair Phase II -85% Design Status Report and Authorization to Bid POLICY QUESTION: Should City Council authorize staff to bid Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance System Repair -Phase II project and return to LUTC and Council for bid award, further reports and authorization? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee CATEGORY: ~ Consent D City Council Business D Ordinance D Resolution MEETING DATE: Nov. 7, 2016 D D Public Hearing Other STAFF REPORT BY: Fei Tan g, P.E. SWM Pro·e_c_t _E_n_..g._i1 _1e_e_r _______ D_E_P_T_:_P_ub_l_ic_W_o_r_k_s ___ _ Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee Memorandum dated November 7, 2016 Options Considered: I. Authorize staff to bid Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance System Repair Phase II project and return to LUTC and Council for award the project to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. 2. Do not authorize staff to bid Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance System Repair Phase II project and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The mayor recommends forwarding option I to the November 15, 2016 City Council consent agenda for approval. CHIEF OF STAFF: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option 1 to the November 15, 2016 City Council consent agenda for approval. Kelly Maloney, Chair Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member Mark Koppang, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to authorize staff to bid Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance System Repair Phase II project and return to LUTC and Council for award the project to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION : 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVIS ED -1/2015 25 COUNCIL BILL# 15T reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION # DATE: TO: VIA: FROM: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM November 7, 2016 Land Use and Transportation Committee Jim Ferrell, Mayor . ~ Marwan Salloum, P.E., Public Works DirectorV<~ Fei Tang, P.E., SWM Project Engineer --;: 1 SUBJECT: Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance System Repair Phase II -85% Design Status Report and Authorization to Bid. BACKGROUND: This project will repair deteriorated stonnwater pipes and structures in the Marine Hills subdivision using a cured in place pipe (CIPP) repair system. As a large percentage of deterioriated pipe has retained its original circumference with aligned contiguous joints, staff determined that this non-invasive method of repair would provide needed structural repairs without reducing current capacity while avoiding costly open trench repairs. This project was split into two phases. Phase I is to repair some of the identified locations where open cut replacement on some sections of the pipe is necessary, and Phase II will be the installation of the CIPP. Phase I of the project was completed in the summer of 2016. The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. The project design 1s approximately 85% complete, which includes the following completed tasks : • Video inspection to identify and map deteriorated pipes and structures • Economic and structural analysis for two different repair methods : open cut replacement or cured-in-place-pipe (CIPP) repair • Pipe survey • Pipe hydraulic capacity analysis • Project design Plan, Specifications and Cost Estimate (PS&E) -85% Ongoing Tasks Include: • Contract PS&E to l 00%. PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES: In house Design Consultant Assistance Services 2017 Construction Cost Phase II I 0% Construction Contingency In house Construction Management TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $24,000 $19,600 $1,785,280 $178 ,528 $24 ,000 $2,031,408 26 November 7, 2016 Land Use and Transportation Committee Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance System Repair Phase II Project -85% Design Status Report Page 2 AVAILABLE FUNDING: Budgeted City Funds Phase II KCFCD Opportunity Fund KC FCD Flood Reduction Grant 2016/2017 TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET cc: Project File Day File $1,359,805 $350,195 $400,000 $2,110,000 27 This page left blank intentionally. 28 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 15, 2016 ITEM#:====- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Authorization to Accept the King County Flood Control District Flood Reduction Grant POLICY QUESTION: Should City of Federal Way accept the King County Flood Control District Flood Reduction Grant award? COMMITTEE: Land Use & Transportation Committee CATEGORY: ~ Consent D City Council Business D Ordinance D Resolution MEETING DATE: Nov. 7, 2016 D D Public Hearing Other STAFF REPORT BY: Fei Tang2 P.E . SWM Pro'ect En ineer £(' ·--- Attachments: DEPT: Public Works Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated November 7, 2016. Options Considered: 1. Authorize staff to proceed with acceptance of the King County Flood Control District Flood Reduction Grant award. 2. Do not authorize staff to proceed with acceptance of the King County Flood Control District Flood Reduction Grant award and provide direction to s_t_af_f_. ___ _ MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding option I to the November 15, 2016 City Council Consent Agenda for a roval. MAYOR APPROVAL: ~Jv\•ttlfh Initi a l CHIEF OF STAFF: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATT : I move to forward option I to the November 15, 2016 consent agenda for approval. Kelly Maloney, Chair Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member Mark Koppang, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to authorize staff to proceed with acceptance of the King County Flood Control District Flood Reduction Grant award. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABlED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REYISED-08/12/2010 29 COUNCIL BILL# 15T reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION # DATE: TO: VIA: FROM: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM November 7, 2016 Land Use and Transportation Committee Jim Ferrell, Mayor . ('L Marwan Salloum , P .E., Public Works Director ~ Fei Tang, P.E., SWM Project Engineer rT SUBJECT: Authorization to Accept the King County Flood Control District Flood Reduction Grant BACKGROUND: In May 2016 Council authorized Staff to proceed with the application for the King County Flood Control District Flood Reduction Grant in the amount of $400,000 . The requested project for this fund is the Marine Hills Conveyance System Repair with construction scheduled in 2017. Staff has received notification that the proposed project has been approved and may proceed with requests for reimbursement for costs incurred associated with subject project. cc: Project File Day File 30 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: N_o_v_em_be_r_l_S::_, 2_0_1_6 ____________ __:IT-=-E=-M::_::_#__::_-=====- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance System Repair Phase I -Project Acceptance POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council accept the Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance System Repair Phase I Project constructed by Northwest Cascade, Inc. as complete? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee CATEGORY: ~ Consent D City Council Business D Ordinance D Resolution MEETING DATE: November 7, 2016 D D Public Hearing Other STAFF REPORT BY: Fei Tan g, P.E., SWM Project En_gineer_ -r._ ___ D_E_P_T_: _P_u_b _lic_W_o_r_k_s ______ _ Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated November 7, 2016. Options Considered: I. Authorize final acceptance of the Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance System Repair Phase I Project constructed by Northwest Cascade, Inc in the amount of$ I 95,544.17 as complete. 2. Do not authorize final acceptance of the completed Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance System Repair Phase I Project constructed by Northwest Cascade, Inc as complete and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option I to the November 15, 2016 City Council Consent Agenda fo r approval. CHIEF OF STAFF: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option 1 to the November 15, 2016 City Council consent agenda for approval. Kelly Malone y, Chair Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member Mark Koppang Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to authorize final acceptance of the Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance System Repair Phase 1 Project constructed by Northwest Cascade, Inc., in the amount of $195,544.17 as complete." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinan ce s only) REVISED-1/2015 31 C OUNCIL BILL# 15T reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION# DATE: TO: VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: November 7, 2016 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Land Use and Transportation Committee Jim Ferrell, Mayor \ \\ '"-_., Marwan Salloum, P.E., Public Works Director~ Fei Tang, P.E., SWM Project Engineer i::-r Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance System Repair Phase I-Project Acceptance BACKGROUND: Prior to release of retainage on a Public Works construction project, the City Council must accept the work as complete to meet State Department of Revenue and State Department of Labor and industries requirements. The Marine Hills Stormwater Conveyance System Repair Phase l Project constructed by Northwest Cascade, Inc. is complete. The final construction contract amount is $195,544.17. This is $17,030.83 below the $212,575.00 (including contingency) budget that was approved by the City Council on June 6, 2016 . cc : Project File Day File 32 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 15, 2016 ITEM#: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Grant Funding for Transportation Improvement Projects -Authorization to Accept Grant Funding POLICY QUESTION: Should City Council authorize staff to accept Regional Mobility Grant funding program for Transportation Improvement Projects? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee CATEGORY: ~ Consent D City Council Business STAFF REPORT BY: Rick Perez, P.E., Cit D Ordinance D Resolution MEETING DATE: November 7, 2016 D D Public Hearing Other DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated November 7, 2016 Options Considered: I. Authorize staff to accept the grant funding under the State Regional Mobility funding program for the 21st Avenue S -S 314th Street to S 316th Street project. 2. Do not accept grant funding under the State Regional Mobility funding program for the 21st Avenue S - S 314 1h Street to S 316th Street ro·ect and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option I to the November I , 2016 Council Business Agenda for appro al. CHIEF OF STAFF: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option 1 to the November 15, 2016 Council Business Agenda for approval. Kelly Maloney, Chair Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member Mark Koppang, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "/ move to authorize staff to accept the grant funding under the Regional Mobility State funding Program/or the 2I"1 Avenue Sfrom S 3141h Street to S 3161h Street project." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REV!SED-08/12/2010 33 COUNCIL BILL# 15T reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION# DATE: TO: VIA: FROM: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM November 7, 2016 City Council Jim Ferrell, Mayor ~ Marwan Salloum, P.E., Public Works Dir~~ Rick Perez, P .E., City Traffic Engineer 'TU SUBJECT: Grant Funding for Transportation Improvement Projects -Authorization to Accept Grant Funding BACKGROUND: This memorandum provides the Council with the current status of the grant applications submitted in 2016 under King County's request for proposals for the State's Regional Mobility Grant Program. Project (Funding Phase) Grant 21st A venue S -S 314th Street to S 316111 Street (Design and Construction) FY 2015-7 Regional Mobility Grant (WSDOT via King County) Estimated Project Cost $3,000,000 Awarded Grant Fund $500,000 Required City Match $2,500,000* * The required City match will be obtained from developer contribution, LIFT (Local Infrastructure Financing Tool), and miscellaneous transfers from completed CIP projects. K:\LUTC\2016\11-07-16 Acceptance of Grant Funding-21 Av S -314 to 316.doc 34 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 15, 2016 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: NEW STREET LIGHTING PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA ITEM#: POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council adopt prioritization criteria for the installation of new street lighting? COMMITTEE: Land Use/ Transportation MEETINGDATE: Nov7,2016 CATEGORY: cg] Consent D City Council Business D Ordinance D Resolution D D Public Hearing Other STAFF REPORT BY: Rick Perez, P.E.,_City Traffic Engin_e_e_r ______ D_E_P_T_:_P_u_b_li_c_W_o_rk_s _____ _ Attachments: Memorandum to Land Use/ Transportation Committee dated November 7, 2016. Options Considered: 1. Approve the proposed prioritization criteria. 2. Do not approve the proposed prioritization criteria and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends Option 1 be forwarded to the November 15, 2016 City Council Consent Agenda for approval. \o\"ZS \«.., CHIEF OF STAFF: COMMITTEE RECOMME ND TION: I move to forward Option 1 to the November 15, 2016 consent agenda for approval. Kelly Maloney, Chair Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member Mark Koppang, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the proposed criteria for the prioritization of the installation of new street lighting. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED D DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED -1/2015 K:\COUNCIL\AGDBILLS\2016\l l-15-16 New Street Lighting Prioritization Criteria.doc 35 COUNCIL BILL# 15T reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION# DATE: TO: November 7, 2016 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: FROM: Jim Ferrell, Mayor .. '\\ ~ Marwan Salloum P.E., Public Works Director~ Rick Perez P.E., City Traffic Engineer (\f7 SUBJECT: New Street Light Prioritization Criteria BACKGROUND On, 2016, City Council directed staff to develop a plan and prioritization to provide street lighting on all City streets in order to inform the budget process in considering a new program. Based on our current inventory of 250 centerline miles of street and average street light spacing of 150 feet, it would take roughly 7500 street lights to fully light all streets. We currently have roughly 4500 street lights, thus needing another 3000 to meet this goal. Conservatively estimating half of the new street lights would be in areas where utilities are undergrounded at $11,000 each, and existing poles can be utilized for street light installation where utilities are overhead at $1000 each, the total cost would be $18 million. Thus, regardless of how aggressively the City Council wished to fund this program, prioritization will be necessary to implement a program of new street light installation. In recognition of the need for prioritization, staff has prepared the following draft criteria: • Collision history in hours of darkness • Supportive land uses • Bus stop usage • Speed limit • Power source location • Roadway classification • Crosswalk treatments • Roadway alignment • Traffic volumes • Sidewalks 10 points 10 points 10 points 10 points 10 points 5 points 5 points 5 points 5 points 5 points 75 points maximum A more detailed explanation of the scoring structure is provided in Attachment A. A common rationale for street lighting requests is to reduce crime, so it may appear surprising that crime rates are not included in these criteria. Studies have shown both a positive and negative correlation between street lighting and crime rates -in other words, street lights are as likely to increase crime as they are to reduce crime. Therefore, staff has not included crime rates as a criterion. 36 ATTACHMENT A NEW STREET LIGHT PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA Collision history: Based on the raw number of collisions occurring during hours of darkness over the last 5 >9 10 9 9 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 l 0 0 Supportive land uses: Based on the "heat index" from the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (see Figure 1), which characterizes the propensity for the land use mix to generate non-motorized trips based on density of residences and employment, proximity to retail uses, vehicle ownership, household . incomes, etc. >28 10 24-28 9 20-24 8 16-20 7 12-16 6 10-12 5 8-10 4 6-8 3 4-6 2 <4 1 37 s in bus zones on the subject street segment. >100 10 90-100 9 80-90 8 70-80 7 60-70 6 50-60 5 40-50 4 30-40 3 20-30 2 10-20 1 <10 0 50 10 45 8 40 6 35 4 30 2 >30 0 Power source location: Overhead 10 Extends existing underground system 5 Underground 0 Principal Arterial 5 Minor Arterial 4 Principal Collector 3 Minor Collector 2 Local Access 1 38 School crossing, no enhancements 5 Marked crosswalk, no enhancements 4 Unmarked crosswalk, school safe walking route 3 Unmarked crosswalk 2 School crossing, enhanced 1 Marked crosswalk, enhanced 0 Advisory speed> 15 mph below speed limit 5 Advisory speed 15 mph below speed limit 4 Advisory speed 10 mph below speed limit 3 Advisory speed 5 mph below speed limit 2 Horizontal or vertical curve with no advisory speed 1 Horizontal and vertical tangent 0 >35,000 5 25,000-35,000 4 15,000-25,000 3 5,000-15,000 2 1,000-5,000 1 <1000 0 No sidewalk or shoulder 5 Gravel shoulder 4 Paved shoulder <4 ft 3 Paved shoulder 4-8 ft 2 Paved shoulder >8 or sidewalk with <4 ft planter 1 Sidewalk with planter strip 4+ ft 0 39 ,~ L g d ~ t -, .. -' -"'~ D CJ D --- FIGURE 1-HEAT INDEX MAP 40 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 15, 2016 ITEM#: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Ordinance: for the Adoption of the 2016 King County Washington Surface Water Design Manual and the 2016 City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County Surface Water Design Manual. POLlCY QUESTION: Should the City Council approve an ordinance for the adoption of the 2016 King County Washington Surface Water Design Manual and the 2016 City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County Surface Water Design Manual? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee CATEGORY: D Consent D City Council Business Attachments: Ordinance Resolution MEETING DATE: November 7, 2016 D D Public Hearing Other DEPT: Public Works Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated November 7, 2016. Options Considered: 1. Approve an Ordinance for the adoption of the 2016 King County Washington Surface Water Design Manual and the 2016 City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 2. Do not approve an Ordinance for the adoption of the 2016 King County Washington Surface Water Design Manual and the 2016 City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County Surface Water Design Manual and ---~provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the November 15, 2016 City Council Ordinance Agenda for first reading. CHIEF OF STAFF: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the proposed ordinance to First Reading on November 15, 2016. Kelly Maloney, Chair Lydia Assefa-Dawson , Member Mark Koppang, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: lsT READING OF ORDINANCE (NOVEMBER 15, 2016): "/ move to forward approval of the ordinance to the December 6, 2016 Council Meeting/or enactment." 2ND READING OF ORDINANCE (DECEMBER 6, 2016): "/ move approval of the proposed ordinance . " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED-1/20 15 41 COUNCIL BILL# 15T reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION# DATE: TO: VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM November 7, 2016 Land Use and Transportation Committee Jim Ferrell, Mayor ~ " ~ Marwan Salloum, P.E., Public Works Director ~ EJ Walsh, P.E., Public Works Deputy Director ~/(-~ Approve an Ordinance for the adoption of the 2016 King County Washington Surface Water Design Manual and the 2016 City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County Surface Water Design Manual BACKGROUND: To meet the past requirements of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for surface water controls the City of Federal Way had previously adopted the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and created and adopted the City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County Surface Water Design Manual. The Federal Way addendum modifies sections of the KCSWDM to adapt it from the County to Federal Way, for example replacing references to the County permitting requirements with reference to the City permitting requirements. On August 1, 2012 the Washington State Department of Ecology issued a new Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit. This permit requires effected Cities and Counties, such as Federal Way, to adopt enhanced Stormwater Design Requirements to meet permit obligations. To meet this requirement, the City of Federal Way, through Title 16 of the Revised Code, has automatically adopted the amended King County Washington Surface Water Design Manual which became effective on April 24, 2016. Following the effective date of the County implementing the new King County Washington Surface Water Design Manual, the City of Federal Way, in accordance with our NPDES permit, is required to amend and adopt the City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County Washington Surface Water Design Manual. Updates to the King County Washington Surface Water Design Manual: King County, a Phase I permittee, was required to update their manual in accordance with the same NPDES permit cycle. City staff provided input at the draft stage to County staff through meetings and workshops, however was not directly involved in the writing, Ecology review or adoption of the Manual. The update included the following significant changes which impact Federal Way: • Updates based on changes in Federal (EPA) and State (Ecology) regulatory enactments and rev1s1ons. • Change in watershed modeling practice (switch from event based to period based) which also required King County to update County modeling software. • Updates based on results from studies, analytical research and available treatment product evolution using best available science. • Increased requirements related to construction of stormwater facilities (pipes, outfalls, etc.) on steep slopes. 42 November 7, 2016 Land Use and Transportation Committee Adoption of the 2016 KCSWDM and the City ofFederal Way Addendum to the KCSWDM Page 2 Updates to the Citv o:f Federal Way Addendum to the King County Washington Surface Water Design Manual: In accordance with the City's NPDES permit, following adoption by King County of the KCSWDM, and no later than December 3 I, 2016, the City of Federal Way is required to prepare and enact an Addendum to the KCSWDM. As part of the Addendum, the City is required to review the KCSWDM and modify sections required to make it specific to the City of Federal Way. Additionally, as part of our NPDES permit, the City is required to make Low Impact Development (LID) the preferred alternative for development. This requirement has other facets as part of the NPDES permit, however part of it includes adding Section 3.1.2 which adds language to the Addendum specific to implementation of Low Impact Development within the City of Federal Way. The update to the previously enacted Addendum includes the following key revisions: • Updates to 'Terminology Definitions' to reflect changes in both County and City code since the original Addendum was prepared. • Add Chapter 3, 'Hydrological Analysis & Design' to incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) standards in accordance with the City's NPDES permit. • Updates to 'Code Reference Table' to reflect changes in both County and City code since the original Addendum was prepared. • Updates to 'Reference Materials' which includes excerpts from City code to reflect changes since the original Addendum was prepared. • Updates to 'Mapping' to reflect City maps that have been updated since the original Addendum was prepared. cc : Day File 43 ORDINANCE NO. ---- AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Phase II Permit Requirements; amending FWRC 16.20.010. (Amending Ordinance Nos. 09-630, 99-352). WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Ecology issued the Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit ("NPDES Permit") on August 1, 2012 pursuant to the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES"); and WHEREAS, the NPDES Permit requires affected cities and counties, such as the City of Federal Way, to adopt Storm Water Design Requirements consistent with the terms of the NPDES permit; and WHEREAS, the proposed regulatory code amendments will serve to better protect the City's natural water resources in terms of both water quality and water quantity; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Federal Way finds it in the best interest of the City to modify the regulatory code to meet the NPDES Permit requirements and that amending this section is consistent with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; and is in the best interest of the residents of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt the 2016 Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington Surface Water Design Manual, which is attached and incorporated by this reference; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Ordinance No. 16- 44 Page I of 3 Rev 1/15 Section 1. FWRC 16.20.010 is hereby amended to read as follows: The~ 2016 King County, Washington Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), the 2016 Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington Surface Water Design Manual, the King County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Manual, and the latest edition of the LID Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound, as they exist on the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter or as hereafter amended, are hereby adopted by this reference. They are referred to in this title respectively as the KCSWDM, Federal Way Addendum, the KCSPPM and LID Manual. Section 2. Severability. Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this chapter, or its application to any person or situation, be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter or its application to any other person or situation. The City Council of the City of Federal Way hereby declares that it would have adopted this chapter and each section, subsection, sentence, clauses, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 3. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto. Section 4. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage and publication, as provided by law. Ordinance No. 16- 45 Page 2 of 3 Rev 1/15 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this ___ day of 20 . ------~ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, JIM FERRELL ATTEST: CITY CLERK, STEPHANIE COURTNEY, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO.: Ordinance No. 16-__ 46 Page 3 o/3 Rev 1/15 CITY OF ~~;;, Federal Way Addendum to The King County Surface Water Design Manual Effective date ??? ... 47 48 Introduction This addendum to the 2016 King County, Washington Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) applies to development and re-development proposals within the City of Federal Way. The KCSWDM has been adopted to meet the requirements of the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act, State Growth Management Act, and the City's NPDES Permit. This addendum includes minor revisions to the KCSWDM to address the differences between King County's and the City's organization and processes. No major substantive changes have been made to the KCSWDM in order to maintain equivalency in review requirements and level of protection provided by the manual. Addendum Organization The information presented in this addendum is organized as follows: Section 1: Terminology: At times King County and City of Federal Way use different terminology to describe or to refer to equivalent subject matter. This section identifies these terms and the City of Federal Way's equivalent terminology. Section 2: Key Revisions: This section specifically identifies the modifications the City has made to the KCSWDM. Section 3: Code Reference Tables: King County code is referenced in many places throughout the KCSWDM. This section identifies these code references and equivalent City Code where applicable. Section 4: Reference Materials: This section identifies which reference materials provided in the KCSWDM are applicable and which are not. It also identifies if equivalent City of Federal Way reference materials are available. Section 5: Mapping: City of Federal Way equivalents to the Flow Control Applications Map and the Water Quality Applications Map are included in this section. The City's equivalent to the County Landslide Hazard Drainage Areas Map is the City Sensitive/Critical Areas Map available from the Community Development Planning Division. Note: Clarifications and interpretations to the KCSWDM or this addendum will be documented and made available through policy statements within the City's Development Standards. City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington Sl.fgace Water Design Manual Page 1 of25 Section 1: Terminology: At times King County and City of Federal Way use different terminology to describe or to refer to equivalent subject matter. This section identifies these terms and the City of Federal Way's equivalent terminology. Critical Drainage Areas (CDA's) -City of Federal Way (CFW) code has no equivalent term or designation. Additional requirements to those outlined in the KCSWDM, if any, will be determined based on information provided in the Technical Information Report for an individual project by the Public Works Director .or their designee. Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) = City of Federal Way Public Works Department. Department of Natural Resources and Parks (DNRP) = City of Federal Way Community Development Department. Director= City of Federal Way Public Works Director. Drainage facilities restoration and site stabilization guarantee and drainage defect and maintenance guarantee = CFW Performance/Maintenance Bond. King County= City of Federal Way (CFW). King County Code (KCC) = Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC). Check code reference table for equivalent code sections. King County Designated/Identified Water Quality Problem -This determination is made based on review of historic problems at the subject site by the Public Works Director. King County Road Standards= City of Federal Way Development Standards Manual. Master Drainage Planning -Not applicable, no CFW equivalent. Redevel~pment (FWRC 16. 05.180) See Federal Way Revised Code, Section 16.05.180.for the purposes of determining water quality review requirements For the purposes of determining flow control and other stormwater review requirements, the definition of"redevelopment project" identified in the KCSWDM applies. Sensitive Area Folio = See Sensitive/Critical Areas Map available from the Community Development Planning Division. Urban Planned Development= Not applicable, no CFW equivalent. City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington S6(face Water Design Manual Page 2 of25 Water and Land Resources (WLR) Division= City of Federal Way Surface Water Management Division. Zoning Classifications: Where the KCSWDM references Agricultural (A) Zoning, Forest (F) Zoning, or Rural (R) Zoning -These zoning classifications are intended for areas outside of the Urban Growth Boundary, therefore the City of Federal Way contains no equivalent zoning. Refer to city zoning maps to determine which zoning classifications applies to the subject property. City ofFederal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington S§l]face Water Design Manual Page 3 of25 Section 2: Key Revisions: This section includes minor revisions to the KCSWDM to address the differences between.King County's and the City's organization and processes, as well as to ensure equivalency. Chapter 1: Drainage Review and Requirements The following steps replace Section 1.1.1 of the KCSWDM: Section 1.1.1 Projects Requiring Drainage Review Introduction The following steps shall be used instead of Section 1.1.1 of the KCSWDM to determine drainage review requirements within the City of Federal Way. This process has been modified to meet the City of Federal Way water quality review requirements and thresholds for redevelopment identified in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.30.120, Nonconforming water quality improvements. Determining Drainage Review Requirements: Step 1 Is the project or proposed activity subject to City Code Title 16 (Surface Water Management) pursuant to FWRC 16.15.010? 16.15.010 Regulated activities. The following projects or activities are subject to the provisions of this title, unless exempted in FWRC 16.15.020: (1) Single-family residential; or (2) Projects that add 2,000 square feet or more of new impervious surface, replaced impervious surface or new plus replaced impervious surface; or (3) Projects that propose 7,000 square feet or more of land disturbing activity; or (4) Projects that propose to construct or modify a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12 inches or more in size/depth, or receives surface and stormwater runoff from a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12 inches or more in size/depth; or (5) Collection and concentration of surface and stormwater runoff from a drainage area of more than 5,000 square feet; or (6) Projects which contain, are adjacent to or directly discharge to a floodplain, stream, lake, wetland, or closed depression, groundwater recharge area, or other water quality sensitive area, or a receiving water with a documented water quality problem as determined by the Public Works Director, based on a written map, policy, water quality monitoring data or plan in existence or implemented by the director prior to submission of a redevelopment application which is determined to trigger application of this subsection, or based on information developed during review of a particular redevelopment application; or (7} Projects that involve a change in use, and_the changed use has a potential to release _a new pollutant(s) to surface water systems within the city. For the purposes of this subsection, "new pollutant(s)" means a pollutant that was not discharged at that City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington SW-face Water Design Manual Page 4 of25 location immediately prior to the change in use, as well as a pollutant that was discharged in less quantities immediately prior to the change in use; (8) Projects other than normal maintenance or other than tenant improvements, but including any increase in gross floor area, in any one consecutive 12-month period which exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value (whichever is greater) of the structure or improvement; or (9) Project proposing $100,000 or more of improvements to an existing high use site. [Note: the dollar amount indicated can be adjusted based on the consumer price index as identified in the KCSWDM in section 1.1.1.] Redevelopment projects that are subject to water quality improvements may phase construction of the improvements as described in FWRC 19.30.120, Non-conforming water quality. Step 2 Projects Subject to Title 16 Projects subject to Title 16 (Surface Water Management) shall determine water quality and storm water review requirements using Sections 1.1.1.A (Step 3) and 1.1.1.B (Step 4) of this addendum. Projects Not Subject to Title 16 Projects not subject to Title 16 (Surface Water Management) may still be subject to clearing and grading review requirements pursuant to International Building Code (IBC) Appendix J and FWRC 19.120. Projects which are subject to clearing and grading permit requirements, but do not meet the thresholds identified in 1.1.1.B, are subject to the Erosion and Sedimentation Control (ESC) requirements and BMPs of Core Requirement #5 and C .1.4 of the KCSWDM as applicable. Specific ESC requirements shall be determined on a project by project basis during clearing and grading review. Those projects exempt from clearing and grading permit requirements, although not required to be reviewed, are still responsible for implementing Erosion and Sedimentation Control (ESC) measures to maintain a stable site and mitigate offsite impacts. Step 3 1.1.1.A PROJECTS REQUIRING WATER QUALITY REVIEW Water Quality Review (Core Requirement #8) is required for any proposed project (except those proposing only maintenance) that is subject to a City of Federal Way development permit or approval, AND that meets any one of the following conditions: New Development 1. The project adds or will result in 2,000 square feet or more of new impervious surface; OR City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington SY.face Water Design Manual Page 5 of25 2. The project proposes 7,000 square feet or more of land disturbing activity; OR 3. The project proposes to construct or modify a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12 inches or more in size/depth, or receives surface and stormwater runoff from a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12 inches or more in size/depth; OR 4. The project contains or is adjacent to "frequently flooded areas" or "special flood hazards" as defined in FWRC 14.05 and 19.142.050; OR 5. The project is located within a Critical Drainage Area, OR Redevelopment 1 (meeting the definition identified in FWRC 19.30.120) 6. Redevelopment which involves the creation or addition of impervious surfaces having an area of 5,000 square feet or more; OR 7. Redevelopment which involves the construction or replacement of a building footprint or other structure having a surface area of 5,000 square feet or more, or which involves the expansion of a building footprint or other structure by 5,000 square feet of surface area or more; OR 8. Redevelopment which involves the repair or replacement of 5,000 square feet or more of an impervious surface, when such redevelopment is not part of a routine maintenance activity; OR 9. Redevelopment which involves the collection and/or concentration of surface and/or storm water runoff from a drainage area of 5,000 square feet or more; OR 10. Redevelopment which contains or directly discharges to a floodplain, stream, lake, wetland, or closed depression, groundwater recharge area, or other water quality sensitive area determined by the Public Works Director, based on a written map, policy, water quality monitoring data or plan in existence or implemented by the Public Works Director prior to submission of a redevelopment application which is determined to trigger application of this subsection, or based on information developed during review of a particular redevelopment application; 11. Redevelopment which involves a change in use, and the changed use has a potential to release a new pollutant(s) to surface water systems within the city. For the purposes of this subsection, "new pollutant(s)" means a pollutant that was not discharged at that location immediately prior to the change in use, as well as a pollutant that was discharged in less quantities immediately prior to the change in use; "Redevelopment" means a project that proposes to add, replace, or modify impervious surface (for purposes other than a residential subdivision or maintenance) on a site that is already substantially developed in a manner consistent with its current zoning, or with a legal nonconforming use, or has an existing impervious surface coverage of 35 percent or more. Water quality -for-the entire -subject property must-be brought -into compliaooe with FWRC Title 1§, where the proposed redevelopment meets or exceeds the thresholds set forth, and shall be done in accordance with the approved King County, Washington Surface Water Design Manual or equivalent, as amended. FWRC 19.30.120) City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington Sw,face Water Design Manual Page 6 of25 12. Redevelopment, other than normal maintenance or other than the tenant improvements, but including any increase in gross floor area, in any one consecutive 12-month period which exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value (whichever is greater) of the structure or improvement being redeveloped. The applicant may provide an appraisal of the improvement. The appraisal must be from a source acceptable to the City. The Public Works Director may require the applicant to provide an appraisal from a second source acceptable to the City if the assessed valuation appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. If more than one appraisal is provided by the applicant or required by the City, the greater of the two amounts shall be used. For purposes of determining value under this section, improvements required pursuant to FWRC 19.30.090 (nonconforming development), FWRC 19.30.110 (street/sidewalk improvements), this section (nonconforming water quality improvements) and FWRC 19.135.030 (street/sidewalk improvements) shall not be counted towards the 50 percent threshold which would trigger application of this subsection; 13. Redevelopment of property which drains or discharges to a receiving water that has a documented water quality problem, as determined by the Public Works Director based on a map, plan, water quality monitoring data or a written policy in existence or implemented by the Public Works Director prior to submission of a redevelopment application determined to trigger application of this subsection, where the Public Works Director determines that the redevelopment requires additional specific controls to address the documented water quality problem. Water Quality Review for "Redevelopment" Projects meeting the "redevelopment" definition and thresholds identified in this section are subject to Core Requirement #8 for the entire site 2 pursuant to the city's Nonconformance code (FWRC 19.30.120). Please note that application of Core Requirement #8 differs between redevelopment and new development as indicated in Section 1.2.8 of this addendum. Step 4 1.1.1.B PROJECTS REQUIRING STORMW ATER REVIEW Stormwater Review (KCSWDM's Small Project Drainage Requirements, Core Requirements 1-9 and Special Requirements 1-5) is required for any proposed project ( except those proposing only maintenance) that is subject to a City of Federal Way development permit or approval, AND that meets any one of the following conditions (see Figure 1.1.1.B for flow chart): 1. The project adds or will result in 2,000 square feet or more of new impervious surface, replaced impervious surface, or new plus replaced impervious surface; OR 2 Site (a.k.a. development site) means a single parcel as established by the King County Department of Assessments , or two or more contiguous parcels that are under common ownership or documented legal-control; used--as -a-singte parcel-for purposes-of-applying -for attthol'tty-from-King-Gcl:mty-to-earry out a developmenUproject proposal. For projects located primarily within dedicated rights-of-way, site includes the entire width of right-of-way within the total length of right-of-way subject to improvements proposed by the project. City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington S5t!face Water Design Manual Page 7 of25 2. The project proposes 7,000 square feet or more of land disturbing activity; OR 3. The project proposes to construct or modify a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12 inches or more in size/depth, or receives surface and stormwater runoff from a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12 inches or more in size/depth; OR 4. The project contains or is adjacent to "frequently flooded areas" or "special flood hazards" as defined in FWRC 14.05.030 and 19.142.050; OR 5. The project is located within a Critical Drainage Area; OR 6. The project is a redevelopment project 3 proposing $100,0004 or more of improvements to an existing high-use site; OR 7. The project is a redevelopment project on a single-or multiple-parcel site in which the total of new plus replaced impervious surface is 5,000 square feet or more and whose valuation of proposed improvements (including interior improvements and excluding required mitigation and frontage improvements) exceeds 50% of the assessed value of the existing site improvements. If stormwater review is required for the proposed project, the type of review must be determined based on project and site characteristics as described in Section 1.1.2 of the KCSWDM. 3 For the purposes of this section "Redevelopment project" means a project that proposes to add, replace, or modify impervious surfaces for purposes other than a residential subdivision or maintenance on a site that is already substantially developed in a manner consistent with its current zoning or with a legal non-conforming use, or has an existing impervious surface coverage of 35% or more. The following examples illustrate the application of this definition. (KCSWDM Chpt. 1) 4 This is the-"projectvaluation" as declared on the submitted permit application. The dottar amount of this threshold is considered to be as of January 8, 2001 and may be adjusted on an annual basis using the local consumer price index (CPI). Note: January 8, 2001 is the effective date of the ESA 4(d) Rule for Puget Sound Chinook salmon. City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington Stilfface Water Design Manual Page 8 of25 FIGURE 1.1.1.B Stormwater Review Flow Chart * Project or Activity Stormwater Review (Small Project Drainage Requirements, Core Requirements 1 -7 & Special Requirements 1 -5) Does project meet definition of "redevelopment project" per KCSWDM? /~ Yes No Does the project meet thresholds #s 6 -7 in Section 1.1.1.B of this addendum? Does the project meet thresholds #s 1 -5 in Section 1.1.1.B of this addendum? Stormwater Review Required See Section 1 .1 .2 of KCSWDM for specific requirements No No No Stormwater Review Requ ired Ye Stormwater Review Required See Section 1.1 .2 of KCSWDM for specific requirements * The requirement to complete a stormwater review is separate from the requirements to conform to the Water Quality Review (1.1.1.A). If water quality is triggered, but a stormwater review is not, the applicant is still required to conform to the Water Quality requirements. City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington Swface Water Design Manual Page 9 of25 The following items amend the identified sections of the KCSWDM: 1.1.3 Drainage Review Required by Other Agencies In addition to the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, CFW is required to notify the Puyallup Indian Tribe. The City of Federal Way administers its own Forest Practices Class IV-General Permits. The City of Federal Way does not administer Class IV-Special Forest Practices Permits. 1.2.5 Core Requirement #5 Projects subject to clearing and grading permit requirements, but which do not meet the thresholds identified in 1.1.1.B, are subject to the ESC requirements and BMPs of Core Requirement #5 and C.1.4 of the KCSWDM as applicable. Specific ESC requirements shall be determined on a project by project basis during clearing and grading review. Those projects exempt from clearing and grading permit requirements, although not required to be reviewed, are still responsible for implementing Erosion and Sedimentation Control (ESC) measures to maintain a stable site and mitigate offsite impacts 1.2.5.3 (F) -City of Federal Way does not assume lead agency status for Class IV Special Forest Practices Permits 1.2.6 Drainage Facilities to be Maintained by City of Federal Way-See FWRC 16.35.010. 1.2.8 Core Requirement #8 Water Quality -Guide to Applying Core Requirement #8 1. Redevelopment a. When water quality improvements are required, the entire site must be brought up to current water quality standards for all impervious surfaces. 1. This includes all impervious surfaces regardless of when they were created, including impervious surfaces created before 2001. 11. Any applicable additional provisions in KCSWDM 1.2.8.l(B & C) - Target Surfaces, also apply. b. See KCSWDM for pervious surface requirements. c. Exemptions identified in 1.2.8 of the KCSWDM do not apply to redevelopment. 2. New Development · a. See KCSWDM for both impervious and pervious surface requirements The following item replaces the identified section of the KCSWDM: 1.4 Adjustment Process -See FWRC Section 16.30.020 through 16.30.070. City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington Sooace Water Design Manual Page 10 of25 Chapter 2: Drainage Plan Submittal The following items amend the identified sections of the KCSWDM: 2.3.1.1 TIR Section 3, Scope of Analysis: Task 2. Resource Review -Maps of the City's sensitive areas, drainage basins, streams, topography, zoning, survey control points, Flow Control Applications, Water Quality Applications, and more are available on the City's website at www.cityoffederalway.com, through the City's Public Works Development Services Division and through the City's Community Development Planning Division. For information on existing drainage complaints and conditions within the city, as-built drawings, and Technical Information Reports, please contact the Surface Water Management Engineering Technician at 253.835.2754. 2.3.1.2. Site Improvement Plan Vertical Datum -KCAS or NGVD-29. General Plan Format-Refer to City of Federal Way Development Standards Manual, Construction Checklist. Plan Sheet Size -City of Federal Way only accepts "D-size" (24" x 36") for construction drawings. Drawing Scale -Refer to City of Federal Way Development Standards Manual. 2.4.2 Final Corrected Plan Submittal Engineering Plan Review -Upon completion of the engineering review process, the engineering plans shall be provided for Public Works Department approval and signature. As-built Drawings -As-built drawings are required at the conclusion of the project, prior to release of the performance bond. All as-built drawings shall be prepared by a land surveyor licensed in the State of Washington and shall conform to all state and local statutes. See Development Standards Manual, As-built Review Checklist, for details. Chapter 3: Hydrologic Analysis & Design The following items amend the identified sections of the KCSWDM: 3.1.2 Low Impact Development (LID) Performance Standard -Low Impact Development is the required approach to site development and all permitted projects must demonstrate compliance with the LID Performance Standard as outlined in Section 1.2.9.4. If infiltration is proposed, testing must be completed as outlined in the Manual. For all projects less than 5 acres, the pre-engineered BMPs in Appendix #C of the KCSWDM may be used instead of modeling. In the event that LID BMPs cannot be utilized for a specific site given site limitations, the applicant may demonstrate why the BMPs within Appendix #C are notsuitable._for either thewhole _ooqiart of the site, the City may then _allow use of non-LID BMP infrastructure to meet the Core Requirements. City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington Soo"ace Water Design Manual Page 11 of25 1.2.9.1.B & 3.1.2 Where the LID Standard is Required -The Low Impact Development Standard outlined in Section 1.2.9.1.B is required for all projects where permits are required in accordance with the amended Section 3.1.2. City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington S1(face Water Design Manual Page 12 of25 Section 3: Code Reference Table: King County Code is referenced in many places throughout the KCSWDM. The following table identifies these code references and equivalent city code where applicable: Kin2 County Code to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Reference Table King County Code FWRC Reference Subject of Reference Equivalent Comment KCC 2 .98 Adoption Procedures 16.05.290 Critical Drainage Areas, adoption KCC 2.98 procedures Not applicable Title 9 Surface Water Management 16 Surface Water Run-off Policy: KCC 9 .04 Variances 16.30 See Adjustments Definitions: Targeted Drainage KCC 9 .04 .030 Review / abbreviated evaluation 16.25.020 See Drainage Review KCC 9 .04 .030 Drainage Review 16 .25.020 KCC 9.04 .030 Large Proiect Drainage Review 16.25.020 KCC 9.04.050 Drainage Review -Requirements 16.25.020 Engineering plans for the purposes See Development KCC 9 .04.070 of drainage review Standards Construction timing and final See Development KCC 9 .04 .090 approval Standards KCC 9.04 .100 Liability Requirements 16.25.030 Drainage facilities accepted by King KCC 9.04.115 County 16 .35 Drainage facilities accepted by King KCC 9 .04.120 County 16 .35 Prohibited discharges in the Water KCC 9.12 Quality Section 16.50.020 KCC 9.12 Water Quality 16.20 & 16.45 Water Quality: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Manual KCC 9 .12 Adoption 16 .20.10 KCC 16.62 Erosion and Sediment Control 16 .25.10.1.e Clearing and Grading Code: Bridge The City follows WSDOT and KCC 16.82 Design No Equivalent King County Standards City of Federal Way uses both Clearing and Grading Code: Chapter 19 .120 and Appendix J of -KCCT6~82 Clearing Limit -t9:120---11re--1ntemattonat-Buitdirrg eode~ ---- City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington S$1ace Water Design Manual Page 13 of25 Kin2 County Code to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Reference Table King County Code FWRC Reference Subject of Reference Equivalent Comment Erosion and sediment control The City follows the King County KCC standards: Seasonal limitation standards manuals per Code 16.82.095(A) period No Equivalent Section 16.20.010 The City follows the King County KCC Grading Standards: Preservation of standards manuals per Code 16.82.lOO(F) Duff Layer No Equivalent Section 16.20.010 The City follows the King County KCC Grading Standards: Soil standards manuals per Code 16.82.1 OO(G) Amendments No Equivalent Section 16.20.010 Clearing standards for individual FWRC does not contain rural KCC 16.82.150 lots in the rural zone Not applicable zoning classification KCC 20.20 Land Use Review Procedures Chapter 19 KCC 20 .70.020 Critical Aquifer Recharge Area 19 .145.450 KCC 21A Critical Areas Requirements 19.145 The requirements vary by Zoning KCC District. Refer to the applicable 21A.14.180.D On-site recreation -space required Chapter 19 District. Critical Areas Code: 100 year KCC 21A.24 floodplain 19.142 The City follows WSDOT and KCC 21A.24 Critical Area Code: Bridge Design No Equivalent King County Standards Critical Areas Code: Bridge pier and The City follows WSDOT and KCC 21A.24 abutment locations No Equivalent King County Standards Critical Areas Code: Building KCC 21A.24 Setbacks 19.145 The City follows the King County Critical Areas Code: Channel standards manuals per Code KCC 21A.24 Migration Zone No Equivalent Section 16.20.010 Critical Areas Code : Definition KCC 21A.24 Streams 19.05.190 Critical Areas Code : Definition KCC 21A.24 Wetlands/Wetland Soils 19.05.230 Critical Areas Code : Fish Passage KCC 21A.24 Requirements 19.145.390 Critical Areas Code: Flood Hazard KCC 21A.24 Area Regulations 19.142 Critical Areas Code: KCC 21A.24 Floodplain/Floodway Delineation 19.142.160 City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington Sea'ace Water Design Manual Page 14 of25 Kin2 County Code to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Reference Table King County Code FWRC Reference Sub.iect of Reference Equivalent Comment Critical Areas Code: Floodplain KCC 21A.24 Data 19.142.050 Critical Areas Code: Flood The City follows the King County KCC 21A.24 Protection facility No Equivalent standards KCC 21A.24 Critical Areas Code: Notice on Title 19.145.170 Critical Areas Code: Regulation of KCC 21A.24 Wetlands 19.145.410 Critical Areas Code: zero-rise and The City follows the King County KCC 21A.24 compensatory storage provisions No Equivalent standards Definitions: Critical Area Ordinance KCC 21A.24 (CAO) 19.145 The City does not have Farm KCC 21A.24 Farm Management Plans No Equivalent Management Plan requirements Floodplain Development Standards: The City follows WSDOT and KCC 21A.24 Bridges No Equivalent King County Standards Notice on Title: Erosion Hazard KCC 21A.24 Area 19.145.170 Rural Stewardship Plan or Farm The City does not have Rural KCC 21A.24 Management Plan No Equivalent Stewardship Plan requirements The City does not have a broad definition, instead each specific KCC 21A.24 Sensitive Area 14.05 & 19.05 area is defined separately Sensitive areas can be placed in a KCC 21A.24 Sensitive Area Tract 18.55.060 conservation open space tract KCC 21A.24.100 Critical Area Review 19.145 KCC 21A.24.110 Critical Area Reports 19.145.080 KCC 21A.24.l 70 Notice on Title 19.145.170 KCC 21A.24.230 Floodplain and Flood Hazard Areas 19.142 KCC 21A.24.270 Notice on Title 19.145.170 KCC Channel migration zone The City follows the King County 21A.24.275 development standards No Equivalent standards City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington Sw:face Water Design Manual Page 15 of25 Kine; County Code to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Reference Table King County Code FWRC Reference Subject of Reference Equivalent Comment The City does not have one code section that lists all of the property specific development standards or overlays, instead they are contained Property specific development throughout code based on land use KCC 21A.38 standards or special district overlays No Equivalent and property characteristics KCC 23.20 Code Compliance: Citations 1.15 Code Compliance: Notice and KCC 23.24 Orders 1.15.040 Code Compliance: Stop Work KCC 23.28 Orders 1.15 .030 Code Compliance: Lien references FWRC does not contain an KCC 23.40 on declaration of covenants form Not applicable equivalent requirement Shoreline Management: Bridge The City follows WSDOT and KCC25 Design No Equivalent King County Standards City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington Sl6}1face Water Design Manual Page 16 of25 Section 4: Reference Materials: Cited Federal Way Revised Code The following are applicable excerpts from the City of Federal Way Revised Code and provided for convenience. In the event of discrepancies or subsequent code updates, the adopted City code ,,governs. 16.05.180 R definitions. "Redevelopment" For the purposes of determining water quality review requirements "redevelopment"_means, a project that proposes to add, replace, or modify impervious surface (for purposes other than a residential subdivision or maintenance) on a site that is already substantially developed in a manner consistent with its current zoning, or with a legal nonconforming use, or has an existing impervious surface coverage of 35 percent or more. Water quality for the entire subject property must be brought into compliance with FWRC Title ].Q, where the proposed redevelopment meets or exceeds the thresholds set forth, and shall be done in accordance with the approved King County, Washington Surface Water Design Manual or equivalent, as amended. (FWRC 19.30.120) For the purposes of determining flow control and other stormwater review requirements, the definition of"redevelopment project" identified in the KCSWDM applies. 16.15.010 Regulated activities. The following projects or activities are subject to the provisions of this title, unless exempted in FWRC 16.15.020: (1) Single-family residential; or (2) Projects that add 2,000 square feet or more of new impervious surface, replaced impervious surface or new plus replaced impervious surface; or (3) Projects that propose 7,000 square feet or more ofland disturbing activity; or (4) Projects that propose to construct or modify a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12 inches or more in size/depth, or receives surface and stormwater runoff from a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12 inches or more in size/depth; or ( 5) Collection and concentration of surface and storm water runoff from a drainage area of more than 5,000 square feet; or (6) Projects which contain, are adjacent to or directly discharge to a floodplain, stream, lake, wetland, or closed depression, groundwater recharge area, or other water quality sensitive area, or a receiving water with a documented water quality problem as determined by the Public Works irector, based on a written map, policy, water quality monitoring data or plan in existence or implemented by the director prior to submission of a redevelopment application which is determined to. trigger application of this subsection, or based on information developed during review of a particular redevelopment application; or -(7)-Projects-thahnvotve-a-change in use, and-the changed-use-has-a potential-to release a new pollutant(s) to surface water systems within the city. For the purposes of this subsection, "new pollutant(s)" means a pollutant that was not discharged at that City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington Soce Water Design Manual Page 17 of25 location immediately prior to the change in use, as well as a pollutant that was discharged in less quantities immediately prior to the change in use; or (8) Projects other than normal maintenance or other than tenant improvements, but including any increase in gross floor area, in any one consecutive 12-month period which exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value (whichever is greater) of the structure or improvement; or (9) Project proposing $100,000 or more of improvements to an existing high use site. [Note: the dollar amount indicated can be adjusted based on the consumer price index as identified in the KCSWDM in section 1.1.1.] Redevelopment projects that are subject to water quality improvements may phase construction of the improvements as described in FWRC 19.30.120, Non-conforming ·water quality. 16.15.020 Exemptions. The following activities are exempt from the provisions of this title: (1) Commercial agriculture, and forest practices regulated under WAC Title 222, except for Class IV General Forest Practices that are conversions from timber land to other uses; and (2) Development undertaken by the Washington State Department of Transportation in state highway rights-of-way is regulated by Chapter 173-270 WAC, the Puget Sound Highway Runoff Program. All other new development and redevelopment is subject to the requirements of this title. 19.30.120 Nonconforming water quality improvements. This section sets forth the standards when and under what circumstances a subject property that does not conform to the development regulations in FWRC Title 12 relating to water quality must be brought into compliance. (1) Redevelopment. For the purposes of this section, "redevelop" or "redevelopment" means a project that proposes to add, replace, or modify impervious surface ( for purposes other than a residential subdivision or maintenance) on a site that is already substantially developed in a manner consistent with its current zoning, or with a legal nonconforming use, or has an existing impervious surface coverage of 35 percent or more. Water quality for the entire subject property must be brought into compliance with FWRC Title _l_Q_, where the proposed redevelopment meets or exceeds the thresholds set forth below pursuant to this chapter, and shall be done in accordance with the approved King County, Washington Surface Water Design Manual or equivalent, as amended. (a) Redevelopment which involves the creation or addition of impervious surfaces having an area of 5,000 square feet or more; (b) Redevelopment which involves the construction or replacement of a building footprint or other structure having a surface area of 5,000 square feet or more, or which involves the expansion of a buil'ding footprint or other structure by 5,000 square feet-of surface area or more; City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington Salface Water Design Manual Page 18 of25 (c) Redevelopment which involves the repair or replacement of 5,000 square feet or more of an impervious surface, when such redevelopment is not part of a routine maintenance activity; (d) Redevelopment which involves the collection and/or concentration of surface and/or stormwater runoff from a drainage area of 5,000 square feet or more; (e) Redevelopment which contains or directly discharges to a floodplain, stream, lake, wetland, or closed depression, groundwater recharge area, or other water quality sensitive area determined by the Public Works Director, based on a written map, policy, water quality monitoring data or plan in existence or implemented by the Public Works Director prior to submission of a redevelopment application which is determined to trigger application of this subsection, or based on information developed during review of a particular redevelopment application; (f) Redevelopment which involves a change in use, and the changed use has a potential to release a new pollutant(s) to surface water systems within the city. For the purposes of this subsection, "new pollutant(s)" means a pollutant that was not discharged at that location immediately prior to the change in use, as well as a pollutant that was discharged in less quantities immediately prior to the change in use; (g) Redevelopment, other than normal maintenance or other than the tenant improvements, but including any increase in gross floor area, in any one consecutive 12-month period which exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value (whichever is greater) of the structure or improvement being redeveloped. The appraisal must be from a state-certified general appraiser. For purposes of determining value under this section, improvements required pursuant to FWRC 19.30.090 (nonconforming development), 19.30.110 (street/sidewalk improvements), this section (nonconforming water quality improvements) and FWRC 19.135.030 (street/sidewalk improvements) shall not be counted towards the 50 percent threshold which would trigger application of this subsection; (h) Redevelopment of property which drains or discharges to a receiving water that has a documented water quality problem, as determined by the Public Works Director based on a map, plan, water quality monitoring data or a written policy in existence or implemented by the Public Works Director prior to submission of a redevelopment application determined to trigger application of this subsection, where the Public Works Director determines that the redevelopment requires additional specific controls to address the documented water quality problem. (2) Timing. All improvements required by this section shall be constructed or installed concurrent with the redevelopment triggering application of this section, unless an applicant for redevelopment opts to pursue incremental construction of required improvements. In that event, the applicant shall develop and submit to the Public Works Director a storm water management plan detailing all of the improvements required by this section, and proceed according to the following subsections: (a) Extent of construction of 11eq,uir.ed water quality improvements. Where the Public Works Director determines that incremental co_r:i_struction is physically f~asible,_tll«e applicant shall construct that portion of the required improvements according to the following schedule: City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington S.-face Water Design Manual Page 19 of25 % of Redevelopment % of Water Quality Improvements 0-24 25 25-49 50 >50 100 Where construction of 100 percent of water quality improvements is required under this subsection, the improvements may be constructed over a period extending no more than five years from the date of approval of the redevelopment. A person choosing to utilize such extended construction shall provide, prior to approval of the stormwater management plan, a performance bond and bond agreement that: (i) Have a term equal to the construction schedule proposed in the plan; and (ii) Comply with the applicable requirements of Chapter 19 .25 FWRC, as amended. (b) Incremental construction not feasible. Where the Public Works Director determines that incremental construction is not physically feasible, 100 percent of the required water quality improvements must be installed, concurrent with the redevel<?pment. ( c) Calculation of redevelopment value. For purposes of calculating the value of redevelopment in order to apply subsection (2)(a) of this section, the Public Works Director shall consider the cost of the proposed redevelopment as a percentage of the assessed or appraised value of all structures on the subject property. The appraisal must be from a state-certified real estate appraiser. ( d) Subsequent redevelopment. Whenever any person seeks approval for redevelopment on property for which incremental construction of required water quality improvements was previously authorized pursuant to this subsection (2), any additional water quality improvements to be required shall be determined by application of the schedule in subsection (2)(a) of this section based on the storm water management plan prepared as part of the first request for authorization of incremental construction. If water quality requirements have changed since preparation of the initial storm water management plan, a new plan shall be prepared detailing improvements required to comply with any existing and new requirements, and the schedule in subsection (2)(a) of this section shall also be applied to the new plan. (3) Location of water quality improvements. A person proposing redevelopment on a property or site having a Federal Way comprehensive plan designation of CC-F (city center frame) or CC-C ( city center core) may construct water quality facilities required by this section below grade. 19.120.030 Exemptions. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to allow clearing, grading, and/or the removal of trees or other vegetation witllimsensitive areas @F sensitive area buffers where prohibited under FWRC Title 12, Division IV, Critical Areas, or in designated native growth protection areas. Clearing and grading activities are also subject to review under Appendix Chapter J of the International Building Code. City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington S@8ace Water Design Manual Page 20 of25 The following actions shall be exempt from the provisions of this article: (1) Digging and filling for cemetery graves. (2) Clearing and grading in a right-of-way authorized in writing by the director of the department of public works for pothole and square cut patching; overlaying existing asphalt or concrete pavement with asphalt or concrete without expanding the area of coverage; shoulder grading; reshaping/regrading drainage systems; crack sealing; resurfacing with in-kind material without expanding the road prism; and vegetation maintenance. (3) Mining, quarrying, excavating, processing, stockpiling of rock, sand, gravel, aggregate, or clay where a permit has been issued by the State Department of Natural Resources. ( 4) Exploratory excavations under the direction of a professional engineer licensed in the state; provided, that the extent of the clearing and grading does not exceed the minimum necessary to obtain the desired information. (5) Normal maintenance and repair of the facilities of a common carrier by rail in interstate commerce within its existing right-of-way. (6) Excavations for utility service connections to serve existing and/or new structures and that is outside any area that is within the jurisdiction of Chapter 19.145 FWRC. (7) Actions which must be undertaken immediately, or within a time too short to allow for compliance with the requirements of this article, to avoid an imminent threat to public health or safety; to prevent an imminent danger to public or private property; or to prevent an imminent threat of serious environmental degradation. This determination will be made by the Public Works Director. (8) Clearing and grading actions that are an integral part of an ongoing agricultural or horticultural use on the subject property. (9) Tree and vegetation removal actions conducted on a residential lot that contains a detached dwelling unit together with any contiguous lots under the same ownership that are being maintained for the use and enjoyment of the homeowner that comply with the following criteria: (a) Any trees or vegetation removed must be outside any area that is within the jurisdiction of Chapter 19.145 FWRC. (b) No trees or vegetation will be removed if that vegetation was required to be retained by or through any development permit issued under this chapter or any prior zoning code. (c) Tree and vegetation removal will not change the points where the stormwater or groundwater enters or exits the subject property and will not change the quality, or velocity of stormwater or groundwater. (d) Trees with a diameter at breast height (dbh) ofup to six inches and vegetation may be removed without city review and approval if criteria (9)( a) through ( c) of this section are met. ( e) Trees with a dbh of six inches or greater may be removed subject to the minimum tree units per acre standard established by Table 19.120.130-1 and subject to criteria (9)(a) through (c) of this section. ( f) Removal of trees with a dbh. of six inches or gi:eater that will result in the subject property falling below the minimum tree units per acre standard per Table 19.120.130-1 shall require planting of replacement trees as necessary to meet the City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington Sw:g'ace Water Design Manual Page 21 of25 minimum tree units per acre standard, or the existing tree units per acre represented by the trees proposed for removal, whichever is less. (g) Hazard trees and nuisance vegetation may be removed without city review and approval if criteria (9)(a) through (c) of this section are met. (10) Clearing and grading actions that comply with all of the following criteria: (a) The subject property contains a permanent building or an active use. (b) The clearing or grading activity will not change the points where the stormwater or groundwater enters or exits the subject property, and will not change the quality or velocity of stormwater or groundwater. ( c) The clearing or grading activity is outside any area that is within the jurisdiction of Chapter 19.145 FWRC. ( d) Grading, filling, and excavation totals less than 100 cubic yards. Quantities of excavation and fill are calculated separately and then added together to determine total excavation and fill. (e) No trees or vegetation will be removed if that vegetation was required to be retained by or through any development permit issued under this chapter or any prior zoning code. (11) Routine maintenance of trees and vegetation necessary to maintain the health of cultivated plants. Topping of trees as defined in Chapter 19.05 FWRC is considered tree removal, not maintenance. ( 12) Removal of overhanging vegetation and fire hazards, or removal of invasive species, hazard trees, nuisance vegetation, or dead, dangerous, or diseased trees when authorized by the director or his/her designee. (13) Removal of trees in easements and rights-of-way for the purposes of constructing public streets and utilities. Protection of trees shall be a major factor in the location, design, construction, and maintenance of streets and utilities. These activities are subject to the purpose and intent of this article. (14) Removal of trees on sites zoned city center core (CC-C) and city center frame (CC-F). City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington S(Jl(face Water Design Manual Page 22 of25 Section 5: Mapping: The City of Federal Way equivalents to the Flow Control Applications Map and the Water Quality Applications Map are attached, as periodically updated. The current versions of the maps are available from the Public Works Department. The City's equivalent to the County Landslide Hazard Drainage Areas Map is the City Sensitive/Critical Areas Map available from the Community Development Planning Division. City of Federal Way Addendum to the King County, Washington SiJiface Water Design Manual Page 23 of25 This page left blank intentionally. 72 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 11/15/2016 ITEM#: ------------------------=====- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: 2017 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES CONTRACT-BID AWARD POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council award the 2017 Street Sweeping Service Contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee CATEGORY: [gJ Consent D Ordinance D City Council Business {)J:>C D Resolution STAFF REPORT BY: DESIREE WINKLE R, P. E., DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIREC TOR MEETING DATE: November 7 , 2016 D Public Hearing D Other DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated November 7, 2016 Options Considered: I. Award the 2017 Street Sweeping Services Contract to Action Services Corporation, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $114,877.61 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 2. Reject all bids for the 2017 Street Sweeping Services Contract and direct staff to rebid the project and return to Committee for further action . MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option I to the November 15, 2016 consent agenda for approval. CHIEF OF STAFF: COMMITTEE RECOMMEND ION: I move to forward Option 1 to the November 15, 2016 consent agenda for approval. Kelly Maloney , Ch a ir Lydia A ss efa-Dawson , Member Mark Koppang , Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "l move to authorize staff to award the 2017 Street Sweeping Services Contract to Action Services Corporation, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $114,877.61 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Al!PROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED-1/2015 73 COUNCIL Bl L # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION# DATE: TO: November 7, 2016 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell Mayor . . ,\ FROM: Marwan Salloum P.E., Public Works Director ~ ~s iree Winkler, P. E., Deputy Public Works Director/ Street Systems Manger SUBJECT: 2017 Street Sweeping Services-Bid Award BACKGROUND: Three bids were received and opened on October 20, 2016 for the 2017 Street Sweeping Services Contract. The total bids for this contract are as follows: Company Action Services Corp. McDonough & Sons, Inc. Best Parking Lot Cleaning, Inc. Available 2017 Budget Amount Bid Amount $114,877.61 $119,898.75 $120,483.66 $120,105.00 The lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Action Services Corporation with a total bid of $114,877.61. The amount available in the 2017 budget for this contract is $120, I 05.00. 74 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 11/15/2016 ITEM#: ------------------------=====- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: 2017 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT-BID AWARD POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council award the 2017 Right of Way Landscape Maintenance Contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: November 7, 2016 CATEGORY: ~ Consent D Ordinance D Public Hearing D City Council Busine~ D Resolution D Other I,~ STAFF REPORT BvYB'ESIREE WINKLER, P. E., DEPUTY Pusuc WORKS DEPT: Public Works DIRECTOR Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated November 7, 2016 Options Considered: 1. Award the 201 7 Right of Way Landscape Maintenance Contract to SMS -Superior Maintenance Solutions, LLC, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $152,269.08 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 2. Reject all bids for the 2017 Right of Way Landscape Maintenance Contract and direct staff to ___ rebid the project and return to Committee for further action. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the November 15, 2016 consent agenda for approval. CHIEF OF STAFF: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: move to forward Option 1 to the November 15, 2016 consent agenda for approval. Kelly Maloney, Chair Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Member Mark Koppang, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "1 move to authorize staff to award the 2017 Right of Way Landscape Maintenance Contract to SMS -Superior Maintenance Solutions, LLC, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $152,269.08 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED-1/2015 75 COUNCIL BILL# 15T reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE# RESOLUTION# DATE: November 7, 2016 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor I:\ ~ FROM: Marwan Sallown, P.E., Public Works Director~ c0u}Uesiree Winkler, P. E., Deputy Public Works Director/ Street Systems Manger SUBJECT: 2017 Right of Way Landscape Maintenance Contract-Bid Award BACKGROUND: Two bids were received and opened on October 20, 2016 for the 2017 Right of Way Landscape Maintenance Contract. The total bids for this contract are as follows: Company SMS -Superior Maintenance Solutions, LLC Avalon Contracting, Inc. Available 2017 Budget Amount Bid Amount $152,269.08 $536,766.00 $283,342.00 The lowest responsive, responsible bidder is SMS -Superior Maintenance Solutions, LLC with a total bid of $152,269.08. The amount available in the 2017 budget for this contract is $283,342.00. Public Works staff conducted a review of the SMS -Superior Maintenance Solutions, LLC to confirm their ability to fulfill the contract requirements. We spoke with two local jurisdiction references who stated that they have been satisfied with their level of service. In addition, we met with company representatives to review specific contract requirements and they are confident they will be able to perform the work to our satisfaction. 76