The URL can be used to link to this page

09-102313City of Federal Way Community Development Services P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Ph: (253) 835-2607 Fax: (253) 835-2609 Project Name: YOUNGSPRING COMPANY Project Address: 35204 PACIFIC HWY S 0, Demolition Permit #: 09 -102313 -00 -DE Project Description: DE - Demolition of (2) residences and (1) garage s Request Line: (253) 835-3050 Parcel Number: 292104 9046 Owner Applicant Contractor YOUNGSPRING COMPANY LLC C/O WM DICKSON CO WM DICKSON CO NORLAN CORP 3315 S PINE ST WMDICC*108J7 (4/1/11) 6220 29TH ST NE TACOMA WA 98409 3315 S PINE ST TACOMA WA 98422 TACOMA WA 98409 tAW CONDITIONS: After final inspection is complete and approved, please contact K.L. Cimmer by e-mail at Karic*dtyoffederalway.com OR by fax at 253-$35-2609 to receive a refund of cash bond. THIS CARD IS TO EMAIN ON-SITE - Cl" of *communityDevelo nt Inspection Record p p Federal Way IVR INSPECTION REQUEST PHONE # (253) 835-3050 PERMIT #: 09 -102313 -00 -DE Owner: YOUNGSPRING COMPANY LLC C/O NORLAN CORP Address: 35204 PACIFIC HWY S FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-8319 This card is part of your required inspection documents. Scheduled inspections may be failed if this card is not on-site. DO NOT LOSE THIS CARD. Inspections are listed as close to sequential order as possible (read left to right, top to bottom). Please schedule inspections as appropriate. Work must not be covered until it is approved. Check with your inspector if you are unsure about any of the inspections or the inspection sequence. On-going inspections are logged on the back of this card. ❑ Final - Building (4050) Approved By Q. W Date (p - �'09 For inspector reference only ❑ Rough Electrical ❑ FINAL - Electrical Approved Approved By Date By . Date SITE ADDRESS s4S- d6 y' r'/� CAP,SUN SUITE/UNIT S ZONING ASSESSOR'S TAX/PARCEL it cc., Aet- ^zie, oAo C/� ) 1 2 !i 4:r" y— - * NAME OF PROJECT rfenant orHomeoumerName) TYPE OF PERMIT ❑ BUILDING ❑ PLUMBING ❑ MECHANICAL V DEMOLITION ❑ ELECTRICAL ❑ ENGINEERING ❑ FIRE PREVENTION PROJECT DESCRIPTION I i�r ` ,i� ��a�e! i?�/�•:r�r �?� Detailed description of work to ' be included on this permit only NAME PRIMARY FRONS PROPERTY OWNER NAI)MG ADD , CITY, STATE, zip g.MAI, OWNER 15 ALSO: 0 CONTRACTOR APPLICANT 0 PROJECT CONTACT NAME 1 fort O it J� c� C/ PRIMARY PHONE CONTRACTOR MAILING ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP FAX WA STATE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE I W'�n- C;W /f� J EXPIRATION DATE / p o /�ii� FEDERAL WAY BUSINESS LICENSE i a� lellgAlq 60 &L APPLICANT NAME Z-,/--;7 x -m /fr Cd PRIMARY PHONE aS"j' T - 7 MAILING ADDRESS, ICIITY, STATE, ZIP y� -??/-r fv f,- FAX PRO.iECT CONTACT (The individual to receive and respond to all correspondence concerning this application) NAME MAILING ADDRESS, CITY, STAA4 ZIP -??/j- fo P,";e, /4cr:.1 �� PRIMARY PHONE (-qr-? f f - c9 FAX �� 417.2 - E-MAIL ALTERNATE CONTACT NAME: PRIMARY PHONE PROJECT FINANCING Required for projects with NAME Q OWNER -FINANCED value of $5, 000 or more (RCW 19.27.095) MAILING ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP PRIMARY PRONE I certify under penalty of perjury that I am the property owner or authorised agent of the property owner. l cw t ft that to the best of my knowledge, the ir;formation submitted in support of this permit application is true and correct. I certib that I will comply with all applicable City of Federal Way regulations pertaining to the work authortsed by the issuance of a permit I understand that the issuance of this permit does not remove the owner's responsibility for compliance with local, stats, or federal laws regulating construction or environmental laws. I further agree to hold harmless the City of Federal Way as to any claim (including costs, expenses, and attorneys' fess incurred in the investigation and defense of such claim), which may be made by any person, including the undersigned, and flled against the city, but only when such claim arises out of the reliance of the city, including its queers and employees, upon the accuracy of the Wormation-Wptisd^o the city as apart of this application. v V -1- '�j r PRINT NAME' U �F R/�C% ,is, Bulletin #100 — 4/17/2009 Page I of 4 kAHandouts\Permit Application Value of Mechanical Work $ A COPY OF BID OR ESTIMATE MUST BE PROVIDED Indicate number of each type of fixture to be installed or relocated as part of this project. Do not include existing fixtures to remain. AIR HANDLING UNITS FANS GAS PIPE OUTLETS OTHER (Describe) AIR CONDITIONER FIREPLACE INSERTS HOODS pommarci.q BOILERS FURNACES HOT WATER TANKS (cam COMPRESSORS GAS LOG SETS REFRIGERATION SYST DUCTING GAS PIPING WOODSTOVES Indicate number of each type of fixture to be installed or relocated as part of this project. Do not include existing fixtures to remain. BATHTUBS (.T bash. c.mb.( LAVS (Hmd SW* TOILETS WATER PIPING DISHWASHERS RAINWATER SYSTEMS URINALS OTHER (Describe) DRAINS SHOWERS VACUUM BREAKERS DRINKING FOUNTAINS SINKS ptchm/ub7ity) WATER HEATERS (mectr:c HOSE BIBBS SUMPS WASHING MACHINESt}TA FIII�URES . Bulletin # 100 — 4/17/2009 Page 2 of 4 k:\Handouts\Permit Application Approved Transaction T r � pscIeanair.org Puget Sound r Agency Page 1 of 1 Notification Case #: 200901108 el SUN 1900 This page must be printed. A printout of the notification, all amendment t6 tF i tion, and the asbestos survey shall be available for inspection at all times at the asbestos project or demolition site (Reg III, 4A3{,�tj rp PW Fee Amount Paid #325.00 ((,,' I Y Credit Card Transaction # VLFF3FF36AE6 Transaction Date 06/02/09 Owner's Name Youngspring Company, LLC Phone (253) 927-1902 Project Street Address 35204 Pacific Hwy. South City Federal Way Zip 98003 Contact Person Rob Rueber Phone (253) 927-1902 Mailing Address 7474 De Foe Drive Cupertino, CA 95014 This project includes asbestos removal. Project Size 20 linear feet / 1115 square feet Project Start Date 06/22/09 Completion Date 06/26/09 Asbestos will be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor Contractor Wm. Dickson Co. Contractor Job # Contact Jason Roosa Phone (253) 472-4489 Mailing Address 3315 South Pine Street Tacoma, WA 98409 This project includes a demolition. Demolition Start Date 06/29/09 Completion Date 07/10/09 Demolition will be completed by a demolition contractor Demo Contractor Wm. Dickson Co. Contact Jason Roosa Mailing Address 3315 South Pine Street Tacoma, WA 98409 Contractor Job # Phone (253) 472-4489 (1) I certify that the information I have provided is to the best of my knowledge true and accurate. (2) I understand that I must file an Amendment to this Notification if: • The type of project has changed. The project types are asbestos and demolition. • The quantity of friable asbestos to be removed meets a larger project category. • The project's start or completion date has changed. (3) I understand one Notification must be filed for each structure. The only exception is for a single-family residence that includes multiple ancillary structures, such as a detached garage or other outbuildings having the same street address. If there is no street address, I have used a building number. (4) I understand the fees for this Notification are nonrefundable. Create Another Notification View History If you have questions, contact us at asbestos@pscieanair.org or 206.689.4058. Log Out https:Hsecure.pscleanair.org/Asbestos/Approved.aspx 6/2/2009 Approved Transaction Page 1 of 1 pscIeanair.org Puget Sound 1 i,,;,,, A., Agency Notification Amendment #: 200901108-2 This page must be printed. A printout of the notification, all amendments to the notification, and the asbestos survey shall be available for inspection at all times at the asbestos project or demolition site (Reg III, 4.03(a)(6)). Fee Amount Paid $25.00 Credit Card Transaction # VLFF4A3212F7 Transaction Date 06/12/09 Owner's Name Youngspring Company, LLC Phone (253) 927-1902 Project Street Address 35204 Pacific Hwy. South City Federal Way Zip 98003 Contact Person Rob Rueber Phone (253) 927-1902 Mailing Address 7474 De Foe Drive Cupertino, CA 95014 This project includes asbestos removal. Project Size 20 linear feet / 1115 square feet Project Start Date 06/15/09 Completion Date 06/19/09 Asbestos will be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor Contractor Wm. Dickson Co. Contractor Job # Contact Jason Roosa Phone (253) 472-4489 Mailing Address 3315 South Pine Street Tacoma, WA 98409 This project includes a demolition. Demolition Start Date 06/22/09 Completion Date 06/26/09 Demolition will be completed by a demolition contractor Demo Contractor Wm. Dickson Co. Contractor Job # Contact Jason Roosa Phone (253) 472-4489 Mailing Address 3315 South Pine Street Tacoma, WA 98409 By submitting this Amendment: (1) I certify that the information I have provided is to the best of my knowledge true and accurate. (2) I understand the fees for this Amendment are nonrefundable. Create Another Notification View History If you have questions, contact us at asbestos@pscleanair.org or 206.689.4058. Log Out https://secure.pscleanair.org/Asbestos/Approved.aspx 6/12/2009 CITY OF 44k Federo% al Way C SFRq� wq� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 81h Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com DEMOLITION PERMIT REQUIREMENTS A demolition permit is required to remove any structure or structures on a subject property. Check with the City's Planning Division to see if the proposal exceeds thresholds that trigger an environmental review. An environmental review and submittal of an environmental checklist may be required, which will extend the time period before a demolition permit can be issued. ❑ Prior to submitting a demolition permit, the following items (as applicable) must be signed by the respective agency (see attached Demolition Permit Contact List). NOTE TO APPLICANT: Utilities shall be disconnected and services performed, if applicable, prior to issuance of the demolition permit. All applicable items below are to be signed and dated by the respective agency representatives. A � �e 1. ASBESTOS ABATEMENT (Copy of approval form and asbestos survey from Puget Sound Clean Air Agency provided) (City of Federal Way Building Official) 2. GAS SUPPLY (Gas to be sh t off, meter removed and final bill paid) !y� (Puget Sound Energy) 3. SEPTIC SYSTEM (Tank to be removed or tank to be drained and filled) t King County Environmental Services) 4. SANITARY SEWER (Check applicable box) 'Fewer line capped at property line ❑ Existing Xewer Ike to remain and be used by proposed new structure 5.�(La�7d n Utility District) 5. ARBAGE (All household garbageff and final bill paid) L✓lwi . o'i✓ Ccl %�( (Waste Management/Other Company) ❑ Completed Construction Permit Application form ❑ Provide the following fees: 1. Demolition Permit Fee 2. Automation Fee I WA State Surcharge 4. Cash Bond Deposit q 13-(Qec{3 6. ELECTRICITY (0-110-09 (Electricity to be shut off and meter removed) s'Aw�r (Puget Sound Energy) 7. FUEL STORAGE TANKS (Above or below grade fuel tanks, have been pumped or removed under Fire Depytment permit prior to any dismantle/excavation) �� (South King Fire and Rescue) S. WATER - Public Source (Check applicable box) XLMeter to be removed and final utility bill paid ❑ Meter to remain and be protected LftEfjtA ur 0 (,k. 7 S c-( . (Water Supplier) ` /�o� ****** OR ****** rT/ 9. WATER - Private Well (Check applicable box) ❑ Private well filled and capped ❑ Private well to be used for other purposes A114 (King County Environmental Services) Based on valuation. See table on pg 4 of the construction permit application. $6.00 $4.50 120% of calculated building permit fee Refundable upon Completed Final Inspection lsuuetm #122 —January 1, 2009 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Demolition Permit Requirements nnppeenn F .- JUN 1 CIS ()p FE,r � . CS HAZNIAT SURVEY PROPOSED FEDERAL WAY RESIDENCE INN PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH & SOUTH 352"" STREET FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Project No. 094-07040 December 6, 2007 Prepared for: Joe Vieira OTO Development, L.L.C. 11925 Wilshire Boulevard, 3`d Floor Las Angeles, California 90025 jvieira@otodevelopment.com Prepared by: Krazan & Associates, Lic. 11715 North Creek Parkway South Suite C-106 Bothell, Washington 98011 (425) 485-5519 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Objective........................................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Scope of Work...............................................................................................................................................1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION..................................................................................................................................2 3.0 ASBESTOS...................................................................................................................................................3 3.1 Sampling Methodology..................................................................................................................................3 3. 1.1 Sampling and Sample Documentation........................................................................................................4 3.1.2 Laboratory Analysis....................................................................................................................................5 3.2 Asbestos Sample Results...............................................................................................................................5 3.3 Asbestos Conclusion......................................................................................................................................9 4.0 LEAD -CONTAINING COATINGS........................................................................................................11 4.1 Sampling Methodology........................................................................................ 4. 1.1 Laboratory Analysis..................................................................................................................................12 4.1.2 Lead Sample Results.................................................................................................................................12 4.2 Lead Consiusions.........................................................................................................................................12 5.0 OTHER REGULATED BUILDING MATERIALS ..............................................................................13 5.1 Flourescent Light Ballasts...........................................................................................................................13 5.2 Floureseent Lamps.......................................................................................................................................14 5.3 Thermostatic Switches.................................................................................................................................I4 6.0 1,11WITATIONS..........................................................................................................................................14 LIST OF APPENDICES Figure1..................................................................................................................................... Site Vicinity Plan Figure2.................................................................................................................................... Site Location Plan Figure 3...............................................................................................................Sample Location Plan (SFR #1) Figure4...............................................................................................................Sample Location Plan (SFR #2) Figure 5............................................................................................. Sample Location Plan (Garage/Workshop) SitePhotos......................................................................................................................................... Appendix A Laboratory Analytical Report/Chain-of-Custody .............................................................................. Appendix B AHEItACertifications....................................................................................................................... Appendix C Ofces Sen ing The {Yestern United States 11715 N. Creek Parkway S.. C-106 . Bothell, Washington 93011 • (425) 485-5519 • Fax: (425) 485-6837 094.0 045.dec 4.11(r,azan& ASSOCIATES,INC. GF01 ECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRON,NIENTAL ENGINEERING CO\STRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION December 6. 2007 Project No. 094-07040 HAZMAT SURVEY PROPOSED FEDERAL WAY RESIDENCE INN PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH & SOUTH 352ND STREET FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 1.0 INTRODUCTION Krazan R. Associates (Krazan) was retained by OTO Development, L.L.C. to conduct an assessment of potentially -regulated building materials that may be impacted during the demolition of structures on the subject site. The regulated materials included as part of this study include potentially asbestos containing materials (ACM) and lead (Pb) -containing paint (LCP), as well as other potentially -regulated building materials such as polychlorinated biplienyl (PCB) -containing fluorescent light ballasts and mercury (Hg) -containing fluorescent tubes and thermostatic switches. Site inspection and sample collection was conducted by an AHERA-certified building inspector (Krazan representative Mr. Robin Hamlet) on November 7, and December 3, 2007. This survey was performed in accordance with Krazan's proposal (dated October 8, 2007) and with federal, state and local regulatory requirements. 1.1 Objective The objective of the survey was to evaluate and collect samples sufficient to document the presence (or absence) of asbestos, lead, and other potentially -regulated materials associated with the structure on the subject site prior to demolition. This assessment did not include areas beyond the `foot print' of structure unless specifically noted within this report. The asbestos survey was conducted in accordance with the "Good Faith" asbestos survey requirements in the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296-62-07721, (Communication of Hazards to Employees) as required by the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA) for buildings that are scheduled for remodel or demolition. The lead -containing paint assessment was conducted to provide information to assist the owner and/or general contractor in complying with WAC 296-155-176 (Lead in Construction) and the Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE) Dangerous Waste Regulations (WAC 173-303). The identification and assessment of other potential regulated building materials was conducted to provide information to assist in complying with the WDOE Dangerous Waste Regulation WAC 173-303-9904. 1.2 Scope of Work The scope of services for the regulated materials assessment was limited to the following tasks: Perform a "Good Faith" asbestos survey to identify the presence, location, and quantity of ACM and presumed asbestos -containing materials (PALM) that may be impacted by the proposed demolition project. Materials identified as suspect or presumed materials were sampled in Offices Sersing ing The li'estern United States 11715 N. Creek Parkway S., C-106 • Bothell, washington 98ol l • (425) 435-5519 • Fax: (42S) 485-6837 092-071-2.ao. KA No. 094-07040 December 6, 2007 Page No. 2 of 15 accordance with Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) sampling requirements Code 40 of Federal Regulations (CFR) 763.86, and analyzed by a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory for the presence and quantity of asbestos. Samples were analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM) per Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 600/R-93/116. • The lead -containing paint assessment was conducted to provide information to assist in complying with WAC 296-155-176 (Lead in Construction) and the Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE) Dangerous Waste Regulations (WAC 173-303). Samples were analyzed by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometric Analysis, per Method SW 846-7420 for weight percent of lead. • The visual identification/quantification of other potentially regulated building materials such as PCB -containing electrical devices (i.e. fluorescent lighting ballasts), as well as potentially Hg - containing fluorescent lighting lamps and thermostatic switches. • Incorporation of the results of the survey into this report which includes a description of survey methodology, material descriptions, sample location drawings, results of sample analysis, and material quantities as applicable. Building inspection and sample collection was performed while the building was unoccupied. At the time of the building inspection, no utilities were servicing the property. Due to the fact that both single family residences on the subject site were scheduled for demolition, care in collection of samples in a manner that would minimize damage to the building surfaces was not necessary. Therefore, no attempt to repair areas where samples were collected was made. Various portions of the interiors of the structures were not completely visible during the inspection due to a significant amount of debris left in the house from vagrants. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site encompasses three parcels; parcel consisted of a vacant lot (APN 2921049048), the second parcel (APN 2921049053) consisted of a single family residence, and the third parcel (APN 2921049046) consisted of a single family residence and a detached two -car garage. The structures inspected as part of this study are the two single family residences and the detached garage. The first single family residence (SFR #1, located on parcel 2921049053) is a single -story, wood- franned over (cinderblock) crawlspace stricture with three bedroonns, one batluoom, a dining room, a living room, and a kitchen. Insulation in this residence appears to have consisted of fiberglass. The roofing system of SFR#1 consists of asphalt roofing shingles and was in poor condition. The heating source within SFR #1 appears to have consisted of electrical baseboard heating, but was historically heated by all oil -burning Pinnace. A copper fuel -oil conveyance line was observed near the footing of the southern exterior wall of the residence. The fuel -oil line was observed to continue under the residence to a concrete pit situated near the middle of the residence (in the crawl space), very near the KrRzan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Westem United States 094.0-M.dcr KA No. 094-07040 December 6. 2007 Page No. 3 of 15 chimney stack for the historic heater (no longer present at tine residence). Hot water appears to have been provided most recently by an electric water heater located within the hall of SFR # 1. The second single family residence (SFR #2, located on parcel 2921049046) is a single -story, wood- iramed structure with a poured concrete basement. The main floor of SFR #2 includes three bedrooms. ane bathroom, a living room, a family room, and a kitchen. The basement consisted of an open room that contained a heating oil furnace near the southeast corner. The detached garage has an 'open' room layout with space sufficient to store two vehicles. On the south end of the garage is a room which appears to have been historically utilized as a workshop. Insulation in SFR #2 appears to be vermiculite in the attic and fiberglass in the exterior walls. The garage/workshop does not appear to contain insulation in any form. The roofing system of SFR #2 consists of asphalt rooting shingles and was in poor condition. The heating source within SFR #2 consists of an oil -burning furnace. The garage appears to have been heated historically with what might have been a wood -bunting stove. A water heater was not located in SPR #2 nor in the detached garage/workshop. 3.0 ASBESTOS Asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral fiber that was widely used as an insulating and binding material in building construction and commercial products. Asbestos is a recognized human carcinogen and has carne under stringent regulatory action regarding its handling and application. In the nnid- 1970s, the use of asbestos was severely restricted in the Unites! States by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The EPA defines ACM as any material which contains more than one percent (1%) asbestos. Typically, the more hazardous forms of asbestos are those that are considered "friable". Friable refers only to ACM that, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by ]nand pressure. Occupational exposure to asbestos is regulated by the Federal Government through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and at the state level by the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (WSDLI). Regulation of asbestos emissions in Federal Way is regulated by the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA). PSCAA also defines ACM as any material which contains more than one percent (I%) asbestos. However, WSDLI may consider materials containing trace amounts (e.g. less than one percent) of asbestos a potential health hazard to those employees handling such materials. 3.1 Sampling 11lethodology A `walk-through' inspection of accessible areas was conducted to identify suspect ACM and PALM. The asbestos survey was performed by all AHERA-certified building inspector in accordance with sampling protocol appropriate for the demolition of such structures. The inspector's A14ERA certification is provided in Appendix C. The sampling protocol was modeled after 40 CFR 763, the PSCAA, Regulation 111, Article 4, and by Washington State Departnnent of Labor and Lndustries (WSDLI) Regulation WAC 296-62-077021. Due diligence was exercised to collect samples in a manner sufficient to determine whether the suspect materials were ACM or not ACM. Selective demolition to access hidden or concealed materials was conducted in those locations where past experience has shown suspect ACM may be located. However, Krazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States 094.0 %040.doc KA No. 094-07040 December 6. 2007 Page No. 4 of 15 construction techniques can render portions of the building inaccessible. In addition, a very significant amount of debris left from the vagrants living at the residences made large portions of the interior spaces not -readily visible or accessible. As a result, additional ACM may be present in inaccessible areas (e.g.. within wall cavities, under debris or similarly inaccessible areas). If suspect ACH not identf ie(l in this report ai-e Jotpul during the remodel demolition, such materials should be preswmed to contain asbestos until characterized. 3.1.1 Sampling and Sample Documentation Suspect ACM were grouped into homogeneous sampling areas (HSA) and categorized according to 40 CFR 763, as thermal systems insulation (TSI), surfacing material, or miscellaneous material. The sampling plan included, at a minimum. the collection and analysis of samples as follows: Thermal System Insulation • In a distributive manner, the collection of a minimum of three samples of each HSA that was not presumed to contain asbestos. • At least one bulk sample from each homogenous area of patched TSI if the patch was less than six square feet. Surfacing Material • In a distributive manner, a minimum of three samples were collected from each homogenous area that was 1,000 square feet or less. • A minimum of five samples were collected from each homogenous area that was greater than 1,000 square feet but less than or equal to 5,000 square feet. A minimum of seven samples collected from each homogenous area that was greater than 5,000 square feet. Miscellaneous Material • In a distributive manner as deemed sufficient by the Inspector. At least one sample was collected of each suspect miscellaneous material not presumed to contain asbestos. Non -Suspect Materials • According to 40 CFR 763-86(4), sampling of the following materials are not required where the accredited inspector has deemed the material to be fiberglass, foam glass, rubber, or other recognized non -ACM. Samples were collected by carefully removing small portions of the suspect material with a sharp knife or other hand tool suitable to the material being sampled. Each sample was placed in a labeled plastic container immediately after collection. Sample containers were then placed in a large re -sealable plastic bag for transportation to the laboratory. The sampling instrument was wiped with a clean moist cloth to decontaminate the tool and minimize the potential release of asbestos fibers or contamination of subsequent samples. Data pertinent to each sample (e.g., date, sample number, material description, and material category) was recorded on a field data sheet. Figures 3, 4, and 5 are floor plans that have been modified to identify approximate asbestos sample locations. Photographs of selected ACM, identified during the survey, are provided in Appendix A. Krazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States C -94 -0 -049A -C ICA No. 094-07040 December 6. 2007 Page No. 5 of 15 3.1.2 Laboratory Analysis A total of twenty-eight (28) bulk samples were collected as part of the survey; twelve (12) samples from SFR # 1, fourteen (14) samples from SPR #2, and two (2) samples from the garage/workshop. Asbestos bulk samples were delivered to Seattle Asbestos Test, L.L.C. (Seattle Asbestos) in Lynnwood, Washington and NVL Laboratories (NVL) in Seattle, Washington, under chain -of -custody protocol for asbestos analysis. Both, Seattle Asbestos and NVL, participates in the NVLAP for quality control procedures. As specified in 40 CFR Chapter 1 (1-]S7 edition) Part 763, Subpart F, Appendix A, each sample was analyzed using PI..\4/dispersion staining techniques, in accordance with EPA 1\4etliod 600/R-93/116. The detection limit for this type of analysis is approximately one (1) percent by volume. Materials containing more than one (1) percent asbestos are considered to be AC\d. The laboratories perform reanalysis of ten (10) percent of bulk samples for the purpose of internal quality control. Laboratory analytical data reports and chain -of -custody forms are provided in Appendix B. 3.2 Asbestos Sample Results Table i (Bulk Asbevos Fiber lbmhys•is•) includes the sample number, associated photo number, sample description, sample location, percent asbestos, and homogeneous sampling area and is listed below. Samples shown to contain greater than one percent asbestos by volume are shown in bold text. Please note, portions of wallboard system samples may be listed in bold text. However, per local WISHA directives, the system as a whole may be considered to contain less than one percent asbestos for the purposes of handling, removal, and demolition. Table 1— S of Asbestos Satimle Analytical Data BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS Pacific Highway South & South 352d Street Percent Sample Sample Sample Asbestos / Homogeneous Number iD Location Sample \+Iaterial Description Friable or Sampling Area Non Friable SIR #1 Layer 1: Brown Diamond Pattern Sheet Vinyl ND 1 LIN -01-1 Kitchen Layer 2; Black Paper 50% Miscellaneous Backing with Mastic / ChrysotileFriable Kitchen, Layer 1: Rose Pattern Sheet 2 LIN -02-1 Living Room, and Vinyl ND Miscellaneous Layer 2: Black Paper Backing Bedrooms with Mastic ND I The friability listed is an assessment of the materials during inspection and is based upon general consulting practices. Friability may be a fiurction of how the material is handled during removal. The reference listed herein is based upon the material in its in-place condition. Owneis / General Contractors should rely upon the properly - trained asbestos -abatement professionals and specifications to detennine friability during removal / demolition processes. Krazau S Associates, Iue. Offices Serving The Westem United States 694-0--040 Au KA No. 094-07040 December 6. 2007 Page No. 6 of 15 BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS Pacific Highway South & South 352nd Street Percent Sample Sample Sample Asbestos / Homogeneous Number ID Location Sample iblatcrial Description Friable ot- Sampling Area ' f 2% i Layer 1: Gypsum Chrysotile* Wallboard; Joint Tape and (Composite Sample of 3 W13-03-1 Kitchen Aluct System < 1% Miscellaneous Asbestos) Layer 2: Gypsum Wallboard; White Chalky Material with ND -- -- Paper FWB-04- Bath/Shower Miscellaneous 4 Light Beige Mastic Behind ND Formica Wallboard Layer 1: Brown Square Pattern Sheet Vinyl ND 5 LIN -05-1 Bathroom 50% Miscellaneous Layer 2: Gray Paper Backing with Mastic Chrysotile / Friable Dark Bronco Mastic on G MAS -06- Bathroom Plywood Floor under Brown ND Miscellaneous 1 Square Vinyl and Paper Backing Layer 1: Shingle; Black Asphaltic Material whnulti- ND colored Mineral Grains Layer 2: Tar Paper; Black 7 RM -07-1 Roof Asphaltic Fibrous Felt t ND Miscellaneous Layer 3: Tar Paper; Black Asphaltic Fibrous Material ND 4% Layer 4: Silver Paint Chrysotile / Friable Adjacent to 8 TP -08-1 RM -07-1 on Tar Patch; Black Asphaltic ND Miscellaneous the Roof Fibrous Material Krazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States 094.0- 40-doc I KA No. 094-07040 December G. 2007 Page No. 7 of 15 BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS Pacific Highwa X South & South 352"d Street Percent Sample Sample Sample Asbestos ! Homogeneous Number 11) Location Sample \Material Description Friable or Sampling Area Non Friable) Krazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The 1Westem United States 094.07040.aoc WPS-09- Fast Window Water Proofing Sealant: Light 9 I in Kitchen Gray Putty Seal ND \Miscellaneous Thermal Cloth Around 45 45%10 7•C-10-1 Hall Closet Furnace Fent Pipe; Off Chrysotile / TSI White and Tan Fibrous Friable Material with lWastic Thermal Cloth on Wall Behind a 1 I "TC -11-1 Hall Closet Furnace Vent Pipe; Off -White ND TSI Fibrous Material Gypsum Wallboard: Off -White 12 WB -12-1 Southwest Bedroom Chalky Material with Paper and ND Miscellaneous Paint Hot 13 Water Hall Closet Hot Water Tank PACM / Miscellaneous Tank Unknown 14 Transite Hall Closet Heating System Exhaust PACM / Miscellaneous Pipe Chimney Unknown SFR #2 1 PC-Ol-2 Throughout White Popcorn Ceiling ND Surfacing the House Material 4% VFT-02- Layer 1: Red 9x9 Vinyl Tile Chrysotile / 2 2 Hallway Non Friable Miscellaneous Layer 2: Black Paper Backing ND with Mastic 4% MAS -03- Layer 1: Red 9x9 Vinyl Tile Chrysotile / 3 2 Hallway Non Friable Miscellaneous Layer 2: Black Paper Backing Willi Mastic ND Layer 1: Green Sheet Vinyl ND 4 LYN-04-2 Kitchen Layer 2: Green Paper Backing Miscellaneous ND with Mastic Krazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The 1Westem United States 094.07040.aoc KA No. 094-07040 December 6, 2007 Page No. 8 of 15 BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS Pacific Highway South & South 352d Street Percent Sample Sample Sample Asbestos / Homogeneous Number ID Location Sample Material Description Friable or Sampling Area . Non Friable i i Layer 1: Brown Wavy Pattern 5 LIN -05-2 Living Room Sheet Vinyl ND Miscellaneous Layer 2: Black Paper Backing ND with Aplastic Layer 1: White Sheet Vinyl ND 6 UN -06-2 Bedrooms Layer 2: Black Paper Backing Miscellaneous Am with Mastic ?? ' Layer 1: Gypsum Wallboard; N Tape and Mud ND GWB- Layer 2: Gypsum Wallboard; 7 07-2 Living Room White Chalky Material with ND Miscellaneous Paper Layer 3: Tape; Tan Fibrous Material with Paint ND GWB- Southwest Gypsum Wall Board: Tape and 8 08-2 Bedroom Mud ND Miscellaneous 9 PC -02-2 Hallway Popcorn Ceiling: Off-white ND Surfacing Lumpy Foamy Material Material 10 PC -03-2 Southwest Popcorn Ceiling: Off -White ND Surfacing Bedroom Lumpy Foamy Material Material INSV- Southwest Ceiling Insulation: 11 01-2 Bedroom Vermiculite; Tan Micaceous ND TSI Material INSV Ceiling Insulation: 12 02-2 Bathroom Vermiculite; Tan Micaceous ND TSI Material INSV- Southeast Ceiling Insulation: 2% 13 03-2 Bedroom Vermiculite; Tan Micaceous Actinolite / TSI Material Friable Layer 1: Shingles; Black Asphaltic Fibrous Material with ND 14 RM -13-2 Roof Granules Miscellaneous Layer 2: Tar Paper; Black Asphaltic Fibrous Felt NrD ICrazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Westcm United States 094-0-MU.doc KA No. 094-07040 December G, 2007 Page No. 9 of 15 BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS Pacific F-Iiahwav Qnnth J2 Granth '2S�nd Cr.•oo. — aicuvica sautinc eulltalllCti nou Qetectanle collcelitratlolls of asbestos fibers. --Gypsum Wall Board as a system contains less than I % detectable concentrations of asbestos fibers. PALM—Presumed Asbestos Containing Building Material 3.3 Asbestos Conclusions Laboratory analysis identified eight (8) regulated ACMs greater than or equal to one percent (1%) asbestos for the samples submitted, and two (2) PACMs. Laboratory analysis of the bulk sample WB -03-1 of file gypsum wallboard system in SFR #1 indicated concentrations of asbestos of 2% Chrysotile in the mudded tape/joint compound. In accordance with a WISHA Regional Directive dated December 28, 2000, the sample was reanalyzed as a composite of both the mud compound and wallboard, Laboratory analysis of the composite sample was reported to contain less than one percent asbestos; the gypsum wallboard system is therefore not considered an asbestos containing material. The hot water tank in the hall closet of SFR #1 was visually inspected. The electric water heater did not have an access door on the outside of the unit, making non-destructive sampling of the insulatoly material within the unit not possible without causing significant damage to the integrity of the unit. Based upon the age of the unit, Krazan considers it likely that the insulatory blanket within the tank contains regulated concentrations of asbestos. Prior to demolitiotl activities, Krazan recommends that the entire unit be disposed of (in whole) as an asbestos containing iteral. It is considered likely that the interior of the air heating system in SFR #2 may contain asbestos insulation or other regulated materials. Typically the cost of inspecting and sampling the interior pol-tions of such heating systems is not justified due to the fact that it would require extensive demolition to conduct such inspections. Krazan recommends that the owner have the furnace inspected at the time of the asbestos abatement by the abatement contractor. We ftu•tller recommend that if materials are visually identified by the contractor as possibly asbestos containing Krazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States 094-0704W .. Percent Sample � Sample Sample Sample Material Description Asbestos ! Homogeneous Number ID location Friable or Sampling Area Non Friablel Garage/Workshop Layer 1: Shingles; Black Asphaltic Fibrous Material with ND Granules I RNM -01-G Roof Layer 2: House Trim; Trace Miscellaneous Tan Mastic NU Layer 3: Tar Paper; Black Asphaltic Fibrous Felt ND G1�B- Interior Wall Gypsum Wall Board: Off - 0 1 -G* 01-G* of Garage White Chalky Material with ND Miscellaneous Paper — aicuvica sautinc eulltalllCti nou Qetectanle collcelitratlolls of asbestos fibers. --Gypsum Wall Board as a system contains less than I % detectable concentrations of asbestos fibers. PALM—Presumed Asbestos Containing Building Material 3.3 Asbestos Conclusions Laboratory analysis identified eight (8) regulated ACMs greater than or equal to one percent (1%) asbestos for the samples submitted, and two (2) PACMs. Laboratory analysis of the bulk sample WB -03-1 of file gypsum wallboard system in SFR #1 indicated concentrations of asbestos of 2% Chrysotile in the mudded tape/joint compound. In accordance with a WISHA Regional Directive dated December 28, 2000, the sample was reanalyzed as a composite of both the mud compound and wallboard, Laboratory analysis of the composite sample was reported to contain less than one percent asbestos; the gypsum wallboard system is therefore not considered an asbestos containing material. The hot water tank in the hall closet of SFR #1 was visually inspected. The electric water heater did not have an access door on the outside of the unit, making non-destructive sampling of the insulatoly material within the unit not possible without causing significant damage to the integrity of the unit. Based upon the age of the unit, Krazan considers it likely that the insulatory blanket within the tank contains regulated concentrations of asbestos. Prior to demolitiotl activities, Krazan recommends that the entire unit be disposed of (in whole) as an asbestos containing iteral. It is considered likely that the interior of the air heating system in SFR #2 may contain asbestos insulation or other regulated materials. Typically the cost of inspecting and sampling the interior pol-tions of such heating systems is not justified due to the fact that it would require extensive demolition to conduct such inspections. Krazan recommends that the owner have the furnace inspected at the time of the asbestos abatement by the abatement contractor. We ftu•tller recommend that if materials are visually identified by the contractor as possibly asbestos containing Krazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States 094-0704W .. 0 KA No. 094-07040 December G. 2007 Page No. 10 of 15 within the fin-nace. that such materials be presumed to be asbestos -containing (unless otherwise sampled by an AH1RA professional) and therefore should be handled and disposed of in accordance with applicable regulatory standards. Asbestos containing materials verified during the site inspection include: • The paper backing of the brown diamond patterned sheet vinyl in the kitchen of SFR #1 (approximately 120 square fee(, friable material); • The paper backing of the brown square pattern sheet vinyl in the bathroom of SPR #1 (approximately 100 square feet, friable material); • The silver roof -patching material on the roof of SFR 41 (approximately 1,000 square feet, triable material); • The wall system in the hall closet behind the heating exhaust system (approximately 25 square feet, triable material); • The heating exhaust (transite) pipe system in the hall closet (approximately 20 linear feet, generally considered non -friable); • 'rhe red 9"x9" vinyl Flooring tile in the hallway of SFR #2 (approximately 50 square feet, generally considered non -Friable), and; • The insulation above the ceiling in SFR #2 (throughout, approximately 870 cubic feet, presuming a square footage of 1,300 at 8 -inches deep, generally considered friable). Should any additional materials be identified which are considered suspect which have not already been sampled as part of this study, Krazan recommends that such materials be sampled prior to their disturbance. Should any materials be identified as asbestos during the course of the demolition project, current federal, state, and local regulations require that a licensed asbestos -abatement contractor and trained workers remove ACM. Prior to abatement of ACM, current regulations require that a "Notice of Intent" form be filed with the WSDLI and PSCAA at least 10 days prior to commencement of the removal project. The WSDLi requires pre -abatement air monitoring and clearance air sampling upon completion of the asbestos abatement project. Ail asbestos removal project is not complete until the analytical results from clearance samples indicate that the residual fiber levels in the ambient air are within acceptable limits. Following removal of the ACM and assumed ACM, asbestos -containing debris must be disposed of at a landfill that accepts asbestos waste in accordance with the current federal, state, and local regulations. As previously noted, there is a possibility that other suspect materials may be present within the building that was not sampled during this survey. Contractors should use caution when performing demolition activities within the project areas even after the completion of asbestos abatement. Should demolition activities discover additional concealed suspect ACM not already sampled, workers should avoid damaging those materials until they have been properly sampled, analyzed and abated in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations. A copy of this report Hurst be provided to contractors bidding on work and each contractor must have a copy of this report during any scheduled demolition activities at the site. However, it is important to note that this document is not intended to be used for abatement bidding or specification purposes and should not be used as such. Krazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States 044-0 1wa.a,.e [] KA No. 094-07040 December 6. 2007 Page No. 1 I of 15 4.0 LEAD -CONTAINING COATINGS Lead containing paint (I,CP) is a potential hazard because paint may contribute to dust inside or outside of a structure. Abrasion of friction surfaces (opening and closing windows), peeling, flaking or chalking as leaded paint ages, or as a result of disturbance such as scraping, sanding, or demolition of lead paint coated materials may contribute to lead dust. Lead dust is of concern because the smaller Particles are more easily absorbed by the body. In 1971, the federal government passed the Lead -Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (LBPPPA), which defined lead-based paint for the first time. In 1977, the LBPPPA was amended and the definition of lead-based paint was changed to paint containing more than 0.06 percent lead by weight or 600 parts per million (ppm). in 1990, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published the first national compilation of technical protocols, practices, and procedures on testing and abatement of lead-based paint. In 1995, HUD published Guirlelines.jor the Evahrarion and Control gj'Leatl-Baser! Paint Hazards in Ilvusing, which replaces the 1990 I -IUD guidelines. The 1995 I -IUD guidelines consider a lead-based paint hazard to exist and require abatement if paint contains lead of an amount greater than or equal to 0.5 percent by weight (5,000 ppm), or greater than or equal to 1.0 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm'). The HUD guidelines only apply to Public Housing Agencies and Italian Housing Authorities, but do serve as a guideline with which to compare. The U.S. Department of Labor and file Washington State Department of Labor and Industries require that Washington State Construction Standards for Lead be followed during "new construction, alteration, repair, or renovation of structures, substrates, or portions thereof that contain lead, or materials containing lead." These standards consider AUi detectable concentration of lead to be a potential hazard during such construction activities. '!'herefore employees performing certain activities at a site where there is a possibility of exposure to lead dust may be required to wear respirators until air sample results can document that exposure to lead is below the permissible exposure limit (50 pg/ni �. Under working conditions, an action level of 30 pghn' in air as an eight hour TWA has been established by OSHA (29 CFR 1910) and Washington State Construction Standard for Lead (WAC 296-155). 4.1 Sampling Methodology "l'he LCP survey was conducted by an AHERA-Certified Building Inspector experienced with identification and collection of LCP samples. In an el ort to evaluate the possible presence of lead containing surface coatings, representative samples of paint and varnished surfaces were collected from each surface with a distinct painting history. Sample locations were selected to be representative of Paint color combinations found within the buildings. Paint color, condition, evidence of layering, type of substrate, and location of painted areas were factors for selecting sample locations. Paint chip samples were obtained by scraping paint layers away from substrates with a steel knife blade. Approximately one square inch of paint coating was removed for each sample. Samples were then placed into two -ounce, puncture resistant, poly bags and labeled with individual sample numbers. After each sample, the sampling blade was cleaned to reduce the possibility of sample cross -contamination. Krazau & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States 044-070I0.doe KA No. 094-07040 Deceruber 6. 2007 Page No. 12 of 15 Paint surfaces were inspected for signs of deterioration and found to be in generally poor condition. Specific paint coated surfaces on the structure included interior gypsum wall systems and exterior wood t ri rhh. 4.1.1 Laboratory Analysis A total of seven (7) paint chip samples were obtained from representative coatings during this survey: four (4) from SFR #1 and three (3) from SFR #2. Samples were analyzed for total lead by Amtest Laboratories, lac. (Amtest) in Lynnwood, Washington and NVL Laboratories (NVL) in Lynnwood, Washington. Amtest is a United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) -accredited laboratory (accreditation number WA000012). Samples were analyzed by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometric Arhalysis, Method SW 846-7420 for weight percent of lead. 4.1.2 Lead Sample Results Table 2 (Lead in Paint AnQl)psls) includes the sample number, sample description, sample location, detectable lead concentration, and (lie condition of the painted areas sampled and is listed below: 'rable 2 — Cununary of t .PAlt Av-1-f—I n.,... LEAD in PAINT ANALYSIS Pacific Highway South & South 352"d Street Sample Number Sample Description Sample Location Lead in ug/g (ppm) Condition SFR #1 1PT-01-1 PT -01-1 Pink/White Walls Living Room 4.72 (4.72 ppm) Poor PT -02-1 Dark Brown Siding Exterior Siding 1,180 (1 180 ppm) Poor PT -03-1 Beige/Rust Window Frame window Frame 2,500 (2500 ppm) Poor PT -04-1 White Walls Southwest Bedroom 59 (59 ppm) Pool- oorSFR #2 SFR PT -01-2 While/Yellow Walls Living Room/Exterior -- Siding ------ V-- --- 145 (145 ppm) - - --�.._ .- Poor PT -02-2 White Walls Southwest Bedroom 200 (200 ppm) Poor PT -03-2 White/Yellow Walls Hallway 180 (180 ppnh) Poor 4.2 Lead Conclusions Laboratory analysis did not idewt larty of the paint chips srrbnthled Jo - anal>>sis as containing lent! in concentrations greater than or equal to 0.5 percent by weight (5,000 ppm). Should any additional materials be identified which are considered suspect which have not already been sampled as part of this study, Krazan reconunends that such materials be sampled prior to their disturbance. Krazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States 094-07040.ao,- KA No. 094-07040 December 6. 2007 Page No. 13 of 15 NN'hile these painted surfaces do not exceed the HUD standard for 'Lead -Based Paint', they are reported to contain detectable concentrations of lead. The U.S. Department of Labor and the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries require that the Washington State Construction Standards for Lead is followed during "new construction, alteration. repair. or renovation of structures. substrates. or portions thereof that contain lead. or materials containing lead." These standards consider an, detectable concentration of lead to be a potential hazard during such construction activities, and therefore employees performing certain activities at a site where there is possible exposure to lead dust will be required to wear respirators until air sample results can document that exposure to lead is below the permissible exposure limit - 50 pg/m'. Under working conditions, an action level of 30 ftghn` in air as an eight hour TWA has been established by OSHA (29 CFR 19 10) and Washington State Construction Standard for lead (WAC 296-155). However, based upon the construction activities proposed at the subject site it is unlikely workers exposures would exceed the WSDLI action limit of 30 micrograms per cubic meter (pg/nr). Krazan understands there are several walls and building materials within the structure that are scheduled to be demolished as part of the demolition project. If material coated with LCI' is to be disposed of as part of demolition, some or all of the demolition debris may be subject to the requirements of WSDOE (WAC 173-303-090). According to WAC 173-303-090, a solid waste, which exceeds five milligrams per liter (mg/1) in the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) for lead, would be designated a dangerous waste for the purpose of disposal. However, based upon past experience on similar projects, it is not anticipated that general demolition debris stream will classify as dangerous waste. it is recommended that TCLP sampling for the purpose of waste characterization be conducted prior to demolition to determine if the demolitions debris classifies as a dangerous waste as defined by 173-303- 090. However, based upon past experience on similar projects, it is not anticipated that general demolition debris stream will classify as dangerous waste. 5.0 OTHER REGULATED BUILDING MATERIALS 5.1 Fluorescent Light Ballasts If ballasts do not tarty a "No PCBs" label, it should be assumed that the ballast is PCB -containing unless determined otherwise by laboratory analytical testing. The EPA through the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) PCB Regulations 40 CFR 761 governs the handling and transportation of PCBs. Special precaution should be applied to prevent skin contact if leaking PCB ballasts are encountered. Leaky ballasts and light fixtures affected by PCB -containing oils must be handled in accordance with EPA's PCB Regulations 40 CFR 761. Workers with 40 hour hazardous waste training may be required for removal or handling of leaking PCB ballasts. The disposal of assumed or confirmed PCB - containing ballasts is regulated under the Dangerous Waste Regulations as a dangerous waste source (WAC 173-303-9904). However, ballasts are sometimes excluded from these regulations when regulated by the federal Toxic Substances Control Act. These exclusions are identified in WAC 173- 303-071(3) (k). in addition, used, non -leaking ballast may be recycled whether or not they contain PCBs. Krazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States 094-01040.4cc K A No. 094-07040 December 6. 2007 Page No. 14 of 15 A'o fluorescent light hallasts n•ere encountered chu•ing ow- site inspection. Should light ballast be encountered during the course of demolition, Krazan recommends that they be handled and disposed of as if they were P03 -containing (due to the cost of analytical testing versus disposal costs). 5.2 Fluorescent Lamps Some fluorescent lamps contain mercury (14g) which is considered harnnhrl to the environment and human health. Currently, the EPA is contemplating the regulatory status of spent fluorescent lamps under the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The WSDOE has adopted an interim policy on the disposal of fluorescent lamps and provides the following guidance: • The recycling of fluorescent lamps by a reputable recycling company is the preferred management method. • If fluorescent lamps are disposed of in solid waste landfills permitted under Chapter 173-351 WAC to receive municipal solid waste, WSDOE will not take enforcement action. • Fluorescent lannps may not be sent to a municipal waste incinerator or demolition landfill. • The crushing of fluorescent lamps prior to transport is not recommended for recycling or disposal unless equipment specifically designed to control the loss of mercury vapor is used. In addition, measures should be taken to prevent breakage of fluorescent lamps while the lamps are in transit to their destination. • Generators who suspect that their lamps would be designated as hazardous waste may wish to send them to a permitted hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal (TSD) facility for liability reasons. However, fluorescent tube manufacturers are changing production methods so that lower levels of mercury are injected into each lannp. Typically, "green tipped" tubes do not contain enough mercury to be considered a hazardous waste. These green -tipped tubes can therefore legally be disposed at landfills, although landfills have ultimate discretion over what they will accept. Ff"hile no fluorescein lamps it -ere obset-ved during the course of this study, Krazan i-ecommends that rf flrtorescenl lamps are part of the demolition waste stream that they are disposed ofln at a permitted n erste facility. 5.3 Thermostatic Switches Thermostatic switches often contain mercury (Hg) which is considered harmful to the enviromnent and human health. Krazan observed that a thermostatic switch within SFR #2 on the hallway wall does contain mercury, and should therefore be disposed of properly if it is planned,%r removal. The treating system in SFR #1 appeared to be controlled historically 1�1, a rheostat. 6.0 LIMITATIONS This survey and review of the subject property has been limited in scope. This investigation is undertaken with the risk that visual observations and random sampling alone would not reveal the KrA7an R Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The western United States (04.0-040. h e KA No. 094-07040 December 6. 2007 Page No. 15 of 15 presence. hill nature. and extent of asbestos -containing materials. Krazan makes no representation as to the asbestos content of materials not sampled or that were inaccessible to our inspector (i.c., between walls. beneath floors, in pipe chases, etc.). The asbestos and lead sample locations are approximate, and are based on field notes and photos of sample locations. The opinions presented herein apply to the site condition existing at the time of the investigation, and are based upon the interpretation of current regulations pertaining to asbestos, lead and other regulated materials. Opinions and recommendations provided herein may not apply to future conditions that may exist at (lie site. The findings presented in this report were based on field observations, random sampling and analysis.. review of available data, and discussions with local regulatory and advisory agencies. Therefore, the data obtained are clear and accurate only to the degree implied by the sources and methods used. The information presented herein is based on professional interpretation using presently accepted methods with a degree of conservatism deemed proper as of the report date. We do not warrant that future technical developments cannot supersede such data. This haznarl sm-ve) is not inteneled to be the sole basis .11 ��en, bids. Confirmation of the condition and volume of the ACMs should be conducted by prospective removal contractors prior to accepting removal bids. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client noted on the cover page and is subject to the terms and conditions in the applicable contract between the Client and Krazan. The client is the only party to whom Krazan has explained the risks involved and has been involved in the shaping of the scope of services needed to satisfactorily manage those risks, if any, from the client's point of view. Any third party use of this report, including use by the Client's lender, prospective purchaser, or lessee will be subject to the teens and conditions governing the contractual work between the Client and Krazan. The unauthorized use of, reliance on, or release of the information contained in this report, without the expressed written consent of Krazan, is strictly prohibited and will be without risk or liability to Krazan. Krazan & Associates, inc. Offices Serving The Western United States caa•-o-wo.doc KA No. 094-07040 December 6. 2007 Pa ac No. 16 o1' 15 Laboratory analysis was conducted by a laboratory accredited under the guidance of the EPA. The results of the analyses are accurate only to the degree of care exercised by the independent laboratories and the representative nature of* the samples obtained. If you have any questions or if a°e may be of further assistance. please (to not hesitate to contact our office at (42S) 485-55 19. Respectfully submitted, KRAZAN & ASSOCIATICS, INC. 2.1 -� Robin hamlet AHERA-Certified Building Inspector, Certification No. 10268764, expires October 23, 2005 r" Jason D. Souza, CHMM Senior Environmental Manager Krazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Westcm United States (;94.1j-04UA,.' APPPENDI\ B LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT i CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY cc cv vv rr 144-1'#VV- VY WG564122018TIU"'ill} �' !i • �� .. � � ! cegl '� „e Z � ��.�"� ! l .�✓� R. r � � ��44 :.. t..`•1 � �i 11•' I 1, � � - Lti t1r _. "7 4J a .N -hii � � i � ? • .� l �` � !� r 4 I � Pont e+ La10 � �� rr� � - � �\moi .'�i . i � � /r�$ t- _ ♦ 1 a n N�• t aj If J > s I f J. ImtF.laie _ s 1 yfi - t ioldipt roff .. t .� � � ,� cik ilr1, i • t ,,, Su�leet Site � i. -•� li .� - Z - 1 1/0 . (s • l tf V t.. i d, /ti 0fi 1, y� u0 c •r� to ;4ti1 c � 122020'00" W 122019'00" W wc:cwa 19 1 a•nn • to N c 00 d' a D t Scale: Dale: SITE VICINITY PLAN AS SHOWN 11/07 Federal Way Residence 1!111 Drawn By: Approved By: lft=jwv�7 Pacific Highway South and S. A. R. H. �'.'�' �.�.L� n South 352 n Sheet Pmiect No. figure No. SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS Federal Wav, Washineton 094-07040 1 Offices Serving the Western United States l NDf A L•ll 11'IiD VA CA N -I I AND 1 / 111-.1 r I .•lff:i? I l.i ' la .,Rl.•.Nt. h y. .. Y --X. .... ....... . X.._..� X . _....y... ... 110SSIM iii Si ........ i71r."I' UIU\ ii\5'al 1� i S"1:U`F 1 0( A i F)", -1 ,. /} I j FIT -1 il A I'.N AI'N x "r.'.11L14f1ii x At AN I 11{I:A IS 1-111 Bill a \59'1II x ",('(.)\THl)LLF.1) I il"\11'1X(, (tF I 131:11RIS Atil)',..\S71------� III:AVH-Y t O\'@RI'.I) \\'I'f1114R1;SilAND IitLGS SURFACY \�..�_. ce Dani CON-RACIORS El PRE: V Ii )US )VAL AND I ION ---- L�\1'1.,1V.t1'1'i0\ SUBACT SI'I'G BOUNDARY AST AIRIV I -.GROUND STORAGE LANK —X— FENCE UST UNDIAUIROUND STORAGE TANK - PARCEL_ BOUNDARY ® POLI:-\•IOU\TED TRANSS -011NIER SI:R•I SING1.1- FAMILY RESIDENCE SIR -1 SINGLEFA41ILYRESIDENCE 'ALL LOCnDONSAND ulUENSIONS AP F APPROXE.'alA T F. _.ax aayswaasasvaa.w.�«wes.w.rrnwawe®wer�wass.•vr�cr,swcrosm SITE LOCATION PLAN Scale, Date, - -- _IN.. S. e 07 Drown byy, , Approved by, OTO DEVELOPMENT, LLC S. A. SITE DEVELOPiMENT ENGINEERS Project tlo. Figure No. FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Offices Servin- the Western tinned States nn.i nln.ui 1 0 R\I-V7-1 1'1'-05.0 SINGLE: FAMILY RESIDENCE- H I I ct FLOOR PLAN EXPLANATION A ASBESTOS AND LEAD BASED PAINT SAMPLE FWB FIBER WALL BOARD MASTIC GWB GYPSUM WALL BOARD LIN LINOLEUM MAS MASTIC PT PAINT CHIP R.M ROOFING MATERIAL TC THERMAL CLOTH TP TAR PATCH WB WALLBOARD IPPS WINDOW PUTTY • ALL LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE SAMPLE LOCATION PLAT' Scott- N. T. S. Daiel 11107 Krazm Drawn by, Approved by, OTO DEVELOPMENT, LLCs. A- SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS Protect Na AAA „-,,.A., 1wre No. , FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Offices Serving the Western United States i.l'\ <I:, ...... A ).!!( I11' I ,1 FAMI1.1I)()\\�,'l __..._.....- RO( IM 1:\1 t)h DR( If )%) — - -- -- - _,A A- MA% -0i-? 1' 1.0? -2 LIVING ROOM LIN Ot,-2 1'T-1)2.2 __ / _(;W6•UK-t1? 1)Gf7R1:x1\1 I NS V -111-02 •- I N SV -t 0 -02 ----A SINCIA I-A.MILY RESIDENCE 0 2 1 ST FLOOR PLAN EXPLANATION' A ASBESTOS AND LEAD RASED PAIN'r SAMPI_I: G\V13 GYPSUM \TALI_ HOARD INS\ INSULA 110N-\'I:lt\41CI11_ll'E LIN LINOLEUM -MAS Ns,\sTIt' PC POPCORN CIALING PT PAINT CHIP 101 ROOFING \•1A ERIAL VFT VINYL FLOOR -I ILII :,. I. I.uCA1 I(t:aS AND DI\u6NMON'S RE A I,P.1(rt!\IA )l? Scales leN. Dote SAIMPLL LOCATION � PLAN T. S. ! 1107 or 4&dKr,azan Brown by- �- _ Approved bye OTO llEVELOP)OENT, LLC S. A K. I SITE DEVELOPMENIT ENGINEERS FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON Protect No, nQA n'/(1,111 i-Ipurr No. A Offices Serving the Western United States t` (AVIIJ)I.(; WOlM til K)1' ( iARA(il:,'WORKSI-JOP UPLANATION • ASBESTOS AND LEAD RASED PAINT SAMPLE (AVI) GYPSUM WALL BOARD RM ROOFING NIATERIAI_ 'Al[I I. 1 OCA I ION*, AND MME`a Eli "VS ARE APPROXIMATE SAMPLE LOCATION PLAN Scales Dote 1\. T. S. 11!07Kxazan Drawn by. _ Approvad bye OTO DEVELOPMENT, LLC S.A. R. i I. SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINF..ERS Project No. Figure No, FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Offices Servin the Weslern United States „l..1 ,.'7,,.,,. C b �x�rr r' t a ,3 Sj �• � }_ , _ .. fit{ ,r J +1,.. ` ,ir �,:? 1v��i+ t��.�'"'�' (:a�J'�y��t ,?x;J I r •a� . c .::f§ku:;xxw :. ,.'r4'�"'� _i,:'.t• -t. Detached Garage of SFR #2 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Federal Way Residence Lin Pacific Highway Soutlt and South 352nd Sircet Federal Way, Washington prlitel i\'a. I Appendix No.: 094-a7oao A _--M - 6i: im i m ANN"� SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS Offices Serving the Westem United States LIN -01-1 Scale: Date: AS S14OWN 11/07 Drawn By Approved By A. D. A. D. prlitel i\'a. I Appendix No.: 094-a7oao A _--M - 6i: im i m ANN"� SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS Offices Serving the Westem United States LIN -02-1 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Federal Way Residence Lin Pacific Highway South and South 352°d Street Federal Way. Washinoon SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS Offices Serving the Western United States WB -03-1 Sete: Date: AS SHORN 11/07 Drawn By: Approved By: A. D. A. D. 1'rgjec1 No. Appendix No.: 094-07040 A SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS Offices Serving the Western United States FWB-04-1 SITE PHOTOGItAPHS Fcderal Way Residence Iia Pacific Highway South and South 352"`1 Street Federal Way, Washington LIN -05-1 & MAS -06-1 scale: Date: AS SHOWN 11/07 Drawn By: Approwd By: A. D. A. D. Prgject No. Appendix No.: 094-07040 A A"W� a� i zan s� SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS Offices Serving the Western United States SITZ: PHOTOGRAPHS Federal Way Residence Inn Pacific Highway South and South 352nd Stfeet Federal Way, Washiu2ton XM -U7-1 & TP -08-1 TC -I0-1 & TC -1 1-1 Scale: Date: AS SHOWN 11/07 Drnwn By: Approved By: A. D. A. D. ProJect No. Appendix No.: 094-07040 A 14C r SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS Offices Serving the Westem United States rJ is ?.. SL�S4 eK vh �Y`rii 1e �' 11+ r r 9 d Vit} ��•`ti}f � jt -�'s r { rryj 44.,,ttw fad raiV��)�y� tri}�%t3)"�� „ i ijh V.'f 129 +S3k: if 3 f 4[h y k2. tIQK i 90, to Al" S +J l-h� ✓,a Sf �k ,6( {� f'S 3S1 i zt�',�,{ ({�it2� r t y } Ass, 'sr"fn`s 'ad > `;- � IF VFT-02-2 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Federal Way Residence Lin Pacific Highway South and South 352"d Sh'eet Federal Way, VN asLington LIN -04-2 S LIN -05-2 Scale: I Date: AS SHOWN 11107 Drawn By: Approved By: A. D. A. D. Prgject No. Appendix No.: 094-07040 A � �w 1(mzan SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS Offices Serving the Western United States LIN -Ob -2 Scale: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS AS SHONAIN Federal Way Residence Inn Drawn By: Pacific Highway South and A. D. South 352°`t Street Project No. Federal Way, Washinuton 094-07040 GWB-07-2 Dale: 11107 Approved By: A. D. Appendi,x No. A =Kra7all SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS Offices Serving the Westem United States GWB-08-2 & PT -02-2 (Sample number shown in picttu'e is used for reference in the field and is not meant to be confftrsed with the sample numbers provided in this report). 4. .::4• .. .. .. .. ._,... .. .: .:',_: .. _ `�i..... > ..- .. �. ... ....ice:,-:d.,:...<]1...}.+S v�.. ..t.,° -i �. A. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Federal Way Residence but Pacific Highway South and South 352"`r Street Federal Way, Washineton PC -02-2 Scale: Date: AS SHOWN 11/07 Drawn By: Approved By: A. D. A. D. Project NO. Appendix No.: 094-07040 A "a Krazan SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS Offices Serving the Westet'n United States PC -03-2 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Federal Way Residence Inn Pacific Highway South and South 352"d Street Federal Way, Washington INSV-01-2 Seale: Dale AS SHOWN 11/07 Drams By: Approved By: A. D. A. D. Project No. Appendix No.: 094-( 1 A SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS Offices Sciving the Western United States INS V-02-2 SI'L'L' PHOTOGRAPHS Federal Way Residence Inn Pacific Highway South and South 352° Street Federal Way. Washington ,..I(mzan SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS Offices Serving the Western United States RM -13-2 Scale: Date: AS SH0WN 11/07 Drawn By: Approved By: A. D. A. D. Project No, Appendix No.: 094-07040 A ,..I(mzan SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS Offices Serving the Western United States