Loading...
PRHSPSC PKT 07-10-2018City of Federal Way City Council Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Committee July 10, 2018 City Hall 5.00 p.m. Hylebos Conference Room MEETING AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes) 3. COMMISSION COMMENTS 4. COMMITTEE BUSINESS Topic Title/ Description Presenter Page Action Council or Info Date A. Approval of June 12, 2018 Minutes 3 Action N/A B. Valley Narcotics Enforcement Team (VNET) / U.S. Hwang 5 Action Consent Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement 7/17/18 Administration (DEA) High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Task Force Agreements. 5. EMERGING ISSUES/PENDING ITEMS Topic Title/ Description Presenter Info Time A. Update on Homelessness Task Force Yarden Discussion 20 mins. Sharry Edwards 6. ADJOURNMENT NEXT REGULAR MEETING: August 14, 2018 Committee Members Jesse Johnson, Chair Mark Koppang Martin Moore K:\PRHSPS Committee\2018\07-10-2018 Agenda (1).doc 1 City staff John Hutton, Parks Director Mary Jaenicke, Administrative Assistant 11 This Page Left Blank Intentionally City of Federal Way City Council PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES & PUBLIC SAFETY COUNCIL COMMITTEE Tuesday June 12, 2018 5:00 p.m. SUMMARY Committee Members in Attendance: Chair Johnson, and Committee members Koppang and Moore Council Member in Attendance: Deputy Mayor Honda Staff Members in Attendance: Eric Rhoades, Assistant City Attorney, John Hutton, Parks Director, Steve Ikerd, Parks Deputy Director, Doug Nelson, Recreation Manager, Yarden Weidenfeld, Senior Policy Advisor, Jeff Watson, Community Services Manager, Sara Bridgeford CDBG/HS Coordinator, and Mary Jaenicke, Administrative Asst. ll. Guests: Sharry Edwards, Chair of the Homelessness Task Force, Dawn Zern and Paul LaRose, Seattle Union Gospel Mission Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 5:00pm Commission Comment: None Public Comment: None BUSINESS ITEMS Approval of Minutes Committee member Koppang motioned to approve the May 8, 2018 minutes as written. Committee member Moore seconded. Motion passed. Panther Lake Trail Pervious Concrete Construction Contract Mr. Ikerd stated that the contractor that won the bid for the construction of the Panther Lake Trail project is unable to do the pervious concrete. Staff went out to bid the pervious concrete, and two bids were received. Four Seasons Concrete was the lowest responsible bidder. The total contract amount is $135,300.00. Committee member Moore moved to forward option 1 to the June 19, 2018 consent agenda for approval. Committee member Koppang seconded. Motion passed. COUNCIL DISCUSSION ON EMERGING ISSUES Update on Homelessness Task Force Sharry Edwards and Yarden Weidenfeld provided an update on the Homelessness Task Force. The task force which consists of 30 members was announced in March. They started meeting in April. This is a broad based task force that will focus on the global issue of homelessness in Federal Way. A full report will be issued by December 21, 2018. Included in the report will be a strategic plan of action to guide the Federal Way Community in responding to homelessness during the next 1-5 years. The Chair made the decision that these meetings would be closed, it's a large task force, these are working meetings and they have a lot that they need to accomplish. The committee asked for copies of the minutes from the meeting. Committee member Moore would like the documents available on the website. He is concerned that these meetings are not opened and transparent to the public. He is also asking that the meetings be recorded and put on the City's website. Ms. Edwards stated that there is not a transparency issue; the documents are available to those that ask for them. There are four task groups and each one has a focus and a task. Those groups are 1) State of homelessness in Federal Way, 2) Resources/Services in Federal Way, 3) Effects on the community and 4) Other services and lack of services. Currently there are 13 active encampments. Once they're cleaned up the Police are very vigilant to prevent them from setting them up again. Chair Johnson stated that during this process the Council is making policy decisions on K:\PRHSPS Committee\2018\06-12-2018 Mins.doc I PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES & PUBLIC SAFETY COUNCIL COMMITTEE Tuesday, June 12, 2018 Summary Page 2 the budget before the report will be completed. It's important that the Council stays informed throughout the process. Committee member Koppang stated that it's important for the community to be able to provide feedback to the task force. Committee member Moore requested that there be a briefing at a future Council meeting. Needs Based Assessment Review Paul LaRose, Director of Emergency Shelters and Dawn Zern Church Engagement Partnership Specialist from the Seattle Union Gospel Mission were asked to attend the committee meeting to provide information on what they know about homelessness and what their organization is currently doing about homelessness in other cities. The one night count tells them that the need for resources is increasing; there were 12,112 people that were homeless in King County. Vehicle residency has increased in Federal Way and there has been an upward trend of homelessness in Southwest King County. Federal Way Public Schools announced that the number of homeless students in the district has risen by 46.5% over five years. This is a faster pace of growth in this area than other areas. 17.2% of Federal Way residents are below poverty level. Mr. LaRose stated that one of the major causes of homelessness is a catastrophe. He added that homelessness is not a money issue; it's a lack of resources issue. Currently the Seattle Union Gospel Mission is doing very light work in Federal Way. They are mainly doing a lot of search and rescue. They are looking for people that need assistance. They are trying to build relationships to try and get people into their shelter to join a recovery program. NEXT REGULAR MEETING July 10, 2018 ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 6:30p.m. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 17, 2018 ITEM #: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: VALLEY NARCOTICS ENFORCEMENT TEAM (VNET) / U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION (DEA) HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA (HIDTA) TASK FORCE AGREEMENTS. POLICY QUESTION: Should the City of Federal Way /Federal Way Police Department enter into an Agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration to continue efforts to stop the trafficking of narcotics and danzerous drugs? COMMITTEE: PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES & PUBLIC MEETING DATE: July 10, 2018 SAFETY COUNCIL COMMITTEE (PRHS&PS) CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ® Other - STAFF REPORT BY: LYNETTE ALLEN, CHIEF'S EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT DEPT: Police Department Attachments: 1. PRHS&PS Committee Memo 2. Drug Enforcement Administration MOU 3. State and Local HIDTA Task Force Agreement — Appendix F 4. U.S. Department of Justice — Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters; and Drug -Free Workplace Requirements. Options Considered: 1. Accept the DEA MOU, State & Local HIDTA Agreement & Certifications 2. Re..J.....ject the DEA MOU,, State & Local HIDTA Agreement & Certifications _ ...................._. ..... _....... _._............ .....___......................................... ................. .............. ...................................................................................................................... MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 MAYOR APPROVAL:lO $_G%RECTOR APPROVAL: Committee Counc Initial Y�Z COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: "I move to forward the Drug Enforcement Administration MOU and HIDTA Agreement between the City of Federal Way / Federal Way Police Department and the U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration to the July 17, 2018 Council consent agenda for approval. " Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to accept the Drug Enforcement Administration MOU and HIDTA Agreement between the City of Federal Way / Federal Way Police Department and the U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, and authorize the Chief of Police to execute said Agreements. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ❑ DENIED IST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # REVISED — 08/12/2010 RESOLUTION # 5 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: July 10, 2018 TO: Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Council Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: Andy J. Hwang, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Valley Narcotics Enforcement Team (VNET) / U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) HIDTA Task Force Agreements Narcotics and dangerous drugs have a detrimental effect on the health and well-being of not only the Citizens in Federal Way, but all people throughout Washington and beyond. The US Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) formed a local Task Force to help stop the trafficking of narcotics and dangerous drugs. The Valley Narcotics Enforcement Team (VNET) was established to create and maintain a multi - jurisdictional team to effectively investigate and enforce the laws relating to controlled substances. This Agreement designates the equitable sharing which the law enforcement participating agencies must acknowledge. In reference to Appendix F, the Federal Way Police Department (FWPD) assigned a Commissioned Officer to the DEA Task Force on February 8, 2010 and FWPD entered into an Agreement with the State and Local HIDTA for the reimbursement of overtime for the Officer. The attached appendix F is a continuation of our efforts to control the trafficking of drugs. This Agreement is effective October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2019 and reimburses FWPD for the Officer's overtime up to $18,343.75. Drug Enforcement Administration Asset Forfeiture Sharing Memorandum of Understanding This agreement is made this 1St day of October, 2018, between the United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration Enforcement (hereinafter "DEA"), and the Federal Way Police Department (hereinafter "FWPD"). 1. The police agencies participating in the DEA SeaTac HIDTA Task Force (Group D-22), hereby agree to the following terms and conditions of this Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") governing the Task Force's equitable sharing requests and participation in the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") Equitable Sharing Program: The following are the Task Force Participants and their contribution to the Task Force: Participating Agency Contribution Auburn Police Department 1 TFO Federal Way Police Department 1 TFO Kent Police Department 1 TFO Port of Seattle Police Department 1 TFO Renton Police Department 1 TFO Seattle Police Department 1 TFO Tukwila Police Department 1 TFO Washington State Patrol 1 TFO 2. Participants acknowledge that equitable sharing is at the discretion of the Attorney General and not guaranteed in any case. Participants acknowledge that sharing will not be awarded in a case if victims have not been fully compensated. State, local, or federal government entities can be considered victims. Equitable sharing among the Task Force members shall be based upon the following pre -arranged percentages: DEA shall receive 20% Valley Narcotics Enforcement Team shall receive 80%* *The equitable sharing will be disbursed per the agreed upon MOU signed by all the parent agencies participating in the Valley Narcotics Enforcement Team Task Force. 3. Participants understand that if a non-MOU member receives an equitable share based upon their contribution, then the MOU Participants' shares shall be reduced proportionately (e.g., if non-MOU agency C receives 10% based upon their contribution, then the MOU Participants' pre -arranged percentages shall be based upon 90% of the full amount available for sharing). 4. Participants further understand that additional adjustments may be necessary so to ensure that DEA (DOJ) receives a minimum of 20%. 5. Participants further understand that the federal decision -makers on each equitable sharing request retain discretion to modify percentages as deemed appropriate based on the facts and circumstances in each case. For the Drug Enforcement Administration: Date: Keith Weis Special Agent in Charge For the Federal Way Police Department: Date: Andy Hwang Chief of Police Appendix F STATE AND LOCAL HIDTA TASK FORCE AGREEMENT This agreement is made this first (1St) day of October 2018, between the United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (hereinafter "DEA"), and the Federal Way Police Department (hereinafter "FWPD"). The DEA is authorized to enter into this cooperative agreement concerning the use and abuse of controlled substances under the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 873. Whereas there is evidence that trafficking in narcotics and dangerous drugs exists in the Greater King County area and that such illegal activity has a substantial and detrimental effect on the health and general welfare of the people of Washington, the parties hereto agree to the following: 1. The DEA SeaTac HIDTA Task Force (Group D-22) will perform the activities and duties described below: a. disrupt the illicit drug traffic in the Greater King County area by immobilizing targeted violators and trafficking organizations; b. gather and report intelligence data relating to trafficking in narcotics and dangerous drugs; and c. conduct undercover operations where appropriate and engage in other traditional methods of investigation in order that the task force's activities will result in effective prosecution before the courts of the United States and the State of Washington. 2. To accomplish the objectives of the DEA SeaTac HIDTA Task Force (Group D-22), the FWPD agrees to detail one (1) experienced officer(s) to the DEA SeaTac HIDTA Task Force (Group D-22) for a period of not less than two years. During this period of assignment, the FWPD officers will be under the direct supervision and control of DEA supervisory personnel assigned to the task force. 3. The FWPD officers assigned to the task force shall adhere to all DEA policies and procedures. Failure to adhere to DEA policies and procedures shall be grounds for dismissal from the task force. 4. The FWPD officers assigned to the task force shall be deputized as task force officers of DEA pursuant to 21 USC 878. 5. To accomplish the objectives of the DEA SeaTac HIDTA Task Force (Group D-22), DEA will assign three (3) Special Agents to the task force. HIDTA will also, subject to the availability of annually appropriated funds or any continuing resolution thereof, provide necessary funds and equipment to support the activities of the DEA Special Agents and six (6) officers assigned to the task force. This support will include: office space, office supplies travel funds, funds for the purchase of evidence and information, investigative equipment, training and other support items. 6. During the period of assignment to the DEA SeaTac HIDTA Task Force (Group D-22), the FWPD will remain responsible for establishing the salaries and benefits, including overtime, of the FWPD officers assigned to the task force and for making all payments due them. HIDTA will, subject to availability of funds, reimburse the Valley Narcotics Enforcement Team "VNET" on behalf of the Federal Way Police Department for overtime payments made by it to the FWPD officers assigned to the DEA SeaTac HIDTA Task Force (Group D-22) for overtime, up to a sum equivalent to 25 percent of the salary of a GS -12, Step 1 (RUS) federal employee, currently $18,343.75, per officer. Note: Task Force Officer's overtime "Shall not include any costs for benefits, such as retirement, FICA, and other expenses." 7. In no event will the Federal Way Police Department charge any indirect cost rate to DEA for the administration or implementation of this agreement. 8. The FWPD shall maintain on a current basis complete and accurate records and accounts of all obligations and expenditures of funds under this agreement in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and instructions provided by DEA to facilitate on-site inspection and auditing of such records and accounts. 9. The FWPD shall permit and have readily available for examination and auditing by DEA, the United States Department of Justice, the Comptroller General of the United States, and any of their duly authorized agents and representatives, any and all records, documents, accounts, invoices, receipts or expenditures relating to this agreement. The FWPD shall maintain all such reports and records until all litigation, claim, audits and examinations are completed and resolved, or for a period of three (3) years after termination of this agreement, whichever is later. 10. The FWPD shall comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to the regulations of the United States Department of Justice implementing those laws, 28 C.F.R. Part 42, Subparts C, F, G, H and I. 11. The FWPD agrees that an authorized officer or employee will execute and return to DEA the attached OJP Form 4061/6, Certification Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, suspension and Other Responsibility Matters; and drug -Free Workplace Requirements. The FWPD acknowledges that this agreement will not take effect and no federal funds will be awarded until the completed certification is received. 12. When issuing statements, press releases requests for proposals, bid solicitations and other documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or part with federal money, the FWPD shall clearly state: (1) percentage of the total cost of the program or project which will be kU financed with federal money and (2) the dollar amount of federal funds for the program or proj ect. 13. The FWPD understands and agrees that HIDTA will provide the DEA SeaTac HIDTA Task Force (Group D-22) Task Force Officers with vehicles suitable for surveillance. HIDTA through DEA will furnish mobile radios for installation in the HIDTA Task Force vehicles and HIDTA will assume the cost of installation and removal. HIDTA will be financially responsible for the purchase of fuel for the leased vehicles and for providing routine maintenance, i.e., oil changes, lubes and minor tune-ups via the HIDTA lease contractor. DEA and HIDTA procedures for reporting and investigating automobile accidents involving Official Government Vehicles (OGV'S)-HIDTA lease vehicles shall apply to accidents involving the leased vehicles furnished to the FWPD personnel, in addition to whatever accident reporting requirements the FWPD may have. 14. While on duty and acting on task force business, the FWPD officers assigned to the HIDTA task force shall be subject to all DEA and federal government rules, regulations and procedures governing the use of OGV's for home to work transportation and for personal business. The HIDTA Executive Committee acknowledges that the United States is liable for the actions of task force officer, while on duty and acting within the scope of their federal employment, to the extent permitted by the Federal Torts Claim Act. 15. The term of this agreement shall be effective from the date in paragraph number one until September 30, 2019. This agreement may be terminated by either party on 30 days advance written notice. Billing for all outstanding obligations must be received by DEA within 90 days of the date of termination of this agreement. HIDTA will be responsible only for obligations incurred by Federal Way Police Department during the term of this agreement. For the Drug Enforcement Administration: Name: Keith R. Weis Title: Special Agent in Charge (SAC) For the Federal Way Police Department Name: Andy Hwang Title: Chief of Police 11 Date: Date: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER CERTIFICATIONS REGARDING LOBBYING; DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS; AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS Applicants should refer to the regulations cited below to determine the certification to which they are required to attest. Applicants should also review the instructions for certification included in the regulations before completing this form. Signature of this form provides for compliance with certification requirements under 28 CFR Part 69, "New Restrictions on Lobbying" and 28 CFR Part 67, "Government -wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonpro-curement) and Government -wide Requirements for Drug -Free Workplace (Grants)." The certifications shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Department of Justice determines to award the covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement. 1. LOBBYING As required by Section 1352, Title 31 of the U.S. Code, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 69, for persons entering into a grant or cooperative agreement over $100,000, as defined at 28 CFR Part 69, the applicant certifies that: (a) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the making of any Federal grant, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal grantor cooperative agreement; (b) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or at- tempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal grant or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," in accordance with its instructions; (c) The undersigned shall require that the language of this cer- tification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subgrants, contracts under grants and cooperative agreements, and subcontracts) and that all sub - recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. 2. DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (DIRECT RECIPIENT) As required by Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 67, for prospec- tive participants in primary covered transactions, as defined at 28 CFR Part 67, Section 67.510— A. The applicant certifies that it and its principals: (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debar- ment, declared ineligible, sentenced to a denial of Federal benefits by a State or Federal court, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this applica- tion been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connec- tion with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this applica- tion had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default; and B. Where the applicant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, he or she shall attach an explanation to this application. 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTEES OTHER THAN INDIVIDUALS) As required by the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 67, Subpart F, for grantees, as defined at 28 CFR Part 67 Sections 67.615 and 67.620— A. The applicant certifies that it will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by: (a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; (b) Establishing an on-going drug-free awareness program to inform employees about— (1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (2) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; (3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and (4) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; (c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a); (d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by para -graph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will— (1) Abide by the terms of the statement; and (2) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; (e) Notifying the agency, in writing, within 10 calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such convic-tion. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, ATTN: Control Desk, 633 Indiana Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20531. Notice shall include the iden- Ification number(s) of each affected grant; (f) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted— (1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or (2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforce- ment, or other appropriate agency; (g) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug- free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f). B. The grantee may insert in the space provided below the site(s) for the performance of work done in connection with the specific grant: Place of Performance (Street address, city, county, state, zip code) SeaTac HIDTA Task Force (Group D-22) 3005 th Ave, Suite 1300 Seattle, WA 98104 eck o oif there are workplaces on file that are not indentified here. Section 67, 630 of the regulations provides that a grantee that is a State may elect to make one certification in each Federal fiscal year. A copy of which should be included with each ap- plication for Department of Justice funding. States and State agencies may elect to use OJP Form 4061/7. Check 0 if the State has elected to complete OJP Form 406117. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTEES WHO ARE INDIVIDUALS) As required by the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 67, Subpart F, for grantees, as defined at 28 CFR Part 67; Sections 67.615 and 67.620— A. As a condition of the grant, I certify that I will not engage in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, posses- sion, or use of a controlled substance in conducting any activity with the grant; and B. If convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any grant activity, I will report the conviction, in writing, within 10 calendar days of the conviction, to: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, ATTN: Control Desk, 810 Seventh Street NW., Washington, DC 20531. As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I hereby certify that the applicant will comply with the above certifications. Grantee Name and Address: Federal Way Police Department 33325 81h Ave South Federal Way, WA 98003 2. Application Number and/or Project Name DEA SeaTac HIDTA Task Force (Group D-22) 4. Typed Name and Title of Authorized Representative Andy Hwang Chief of Police – Federal Way Police Department 5. Signature 3. Grantee IRS/Vendor Number 6. Date *U.S. Government Printing Office: 1996 - 405-037/40014 City of Federal Way HOMELESSNESS TASK FORCE Agenda JUNE 139 2018 8:30 am - 8:40 am Introduction by Task Force Chair Sharry Edwards 8:40 am - 9:15 am Discussion on causes of homelessness led by Dan Wise, Director of Homeless Services, Catholic Community Services 9:15 am - 9:55 am Discussion on proposed subcommittees led by Task Force Chair Sharry Edwards 9:55 am - 10:00 am Good of the Order 10:00 am Adjourn. Thank you for your participation! Report on June 13, 2018 meeting of Federal Way Homelessness Task Force 8:30 AM -10:00 AM ATTENDANCE Present were: 1. Sharry Edwards (Chair), Community Health Nurse/Governing Board Member/Board Member, Kaiser Permanente/Federal Way Community Caregiving Network/Ashley House 2. Jeff Bellinghausen (Vice -Chair), Captain/Community Affairs Officer, South King Fire & Rescue 3. Chantel Arnone, Emergency Department Clinical Manager, CHI Franciscan Health 4. Sarah Bridgeford, CDBG/HS Coordinator, City of Federal Way Community Development Department 5. Jeanne Burbidge, Former Mayor/Deputy Mayor/City Councilmember, City of Federal Way 6. Angela Coe, Regional Operations Director, Valley Cities Behavioral Health 7. Willa Gaines, Advisory Board Member, Reach Out 8. Lawrence Garrett, Executive Director, Advancing Leadership 9. Byron Hiller, Property Management Division President/President, Coldwell Banker Commercial Danforth/FUSION Board of Directors 10. Peggy LaPorte, Founder, Former President, and Executive Board Member, FUSION 11. David Larson, Judge, City of Federal Way Municipal Court 12. Kimberly McGlynn, Operations Manager, King County Library System 13. Jackie Muth, Partner, Mahrt & Associates 14. Stephan Neal, Deputy Chief, City of Federal Way Police Department 15. Lynn Ormsby, Advisory Board Member, Sound Alliance/Federal Way Day Center 16. Shelley Pauls, Liaison, Federal Way faith community 17. Shelly Pricco, Executive Director, Nexus Youth and Families 18. Stacie Scarpaci, Probation Supervisor, City of Federal Way Municipal Court 19. Ken Stark, Vice -Chair, City of Federal Way Human Services Commission 20. Rebecca Stephens, Community Resource and Referrals Center Program Manager, United States Department of Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System 21. Yarden Weidenfeld, Senior Policy Advisor, City of Federal Way Mayor's Office 22. Dan Wise, Director of Homeless Services, Catholic Community Services in King County Absent Were: 1. Elric Bey, Shelter Operator, New Hope Christian Fellowship 2. Robin Corak, CEO, Multi -Service Center 3. Dan Dizon, Executive Director of Human Resources and Community Relations, Federal Way Public Schools 4. Jack Dovey, US Carrier Relations and Business Development, GPS Lockbox 5. Marty Hartman, Executive Director, Mary's Place 6. Tom Medhurst, Member/President and CEO, City of Federal Way Planning Commission/L & L Nursery Supply, Inc. 7. Rick Miller, Pastor, New Hope Christian Fellowship 8. Jeff Watson, Community Services Manager, City of Federal Way Community Development Department PROCEEDINGS INTRODUCTION Chair Sharry EDWARDS welcomed everyone and explained that today we would be discussing causes of homelessness and then beginning to talk about breaking into task groups/subcommittees. DISCUSSION ON CAUSES OF HOMELESSNESS (Led by Dan Wise, Director of Homeless Services, Catholic Community Services in King County)—See "King County and Seattle Homelessness — Some Facts" Outline • WISE highlighted the following from the Outline: o Diagram showing increase in homelessness in King County o Diagram showing increase in homelessness by race ■ White policy makers ■ Homeless people are disproportionately people of color o Diagram showing increase in rents ■ Federal Way used to be affordable ■ Now, even Federal Way is harder even for people with middle class incomes o Diagrams showing affordability of rent in Seattle ■ Homeless folk make fifteen percent (15%) of area median income (AMI) ■ The "green area" shows where households making 60 to 90 percent of AMI can afford to live. This is the income of the average school teacher. • Between 2011 and 2014, all the green areas are gone One needs a six -figure income now to live in Seattle Where do you go? • WISE said that we need to find a way to replace affordable housing, either: o Vouchers OR o Building it LARSON asked about Federal Way numbers. BRIDGEFORD said that Federal Way is not a problem at the same extent as Seattle but does have some of these issues. WISE added that most of her staff (at Catholic Community Services in King County (CCS)) do not live in King County. Federal Way is not affordable for them. A rent study has been commissioned by the Greater Federal Way Chamber of Commerce. BURBIDGE said there have been some analyses in the Seattle Times. BRIDGEFORD said that the Housing Consortium has done some analysis on this issue. Looking up on the Internet, BELLINGHAUSEN said that the average rent in Federal Way is $1300 for 850 square feet. This is a five percent increase over the previous year. STARK said that we have to look not only at the cost of rent but at rent compared to income. A lot of homeless people have no income or are on SSI (very low income). A number of people on SSI choose to be homeless because if not, they would spend every penny on housing and have no money for everything else. So we need to talk income. Then we need to talk about barriers to making income—chemical dependency, mental health issues, lack of training. 0 WISE said that some people are so far out that they do not see housing as an attainable goal. STEPHENS said that there is a 90 -day wait once someone gets a voucher to get into housing. Barriers include: o Criminal convictions. (One can get vouchers with criminal convictions but will have trouble finding a landlord who will let him/her rent.) o Money owed to past landlords. This could be thousands of dollars. This is a big barrier. New landlords will get a credit report, see this, and not let the person rent. o Move -in money (though there is a lot of help available on this) o Mental health and chemical dependency. o History of addiction. This is another big barrier. • WISE said that these barriers exist even for these people, who have a locked -in subsidy from the government which is better than a new job—they have a guaranteed subsidy letter. WISE also said that our biggest barrier is the lack of units. Any time CCS opens a new building, it is filled immediately. There is no availability. • STARK said that new buildings are so expensive. This is not sustainable. • LARSON asked about the role of teaching financial literacy, the consequences of not paying rent or of damaging a rental unit. WISE responded that the issue is consequences of lacking income. • WISE said that one needs to be homeless to talk to a social worker—there is no money for prevention. • LARSON said that we need to talk about prevention at some point—it can be taught. Will they fit? • STARK said that personal responsibility is left out of a lot of strategy. When you leave that out, it will put individuals into housing who still have chemical dependency or mental health issues. They will trash the place and get booted out to the street. So we need to integrate primary intervention with personal responsibility (i.e. following rules). LARSON added that we need to break the cycle, but coddling reinforces the cycle. STARK added that it also reinforces the attitude of landlords not wanting to rent to these people. GAINES said we should talk to schools about teaching citizenship classes. WISE said that there is a significant problem with mental health and chemical dependency and no treatment on demand. • LARSON said that each of these items discussed is one jigsaw puzzle piece, so each one is a component part. Prevention is one piece. LAPORTE said that FUSION did have an upswing in issues. It had promised the City that its units would be managed well and would not have problems. So they had to change—they had to evict some people. They get monthly reports in which they are told what is going on. Sometimes they see problems when the person moves out. They have spent a total of $10,000 so far this year on these issues. • EDWARDS said that Community Caregiving Network (CCN) has three low income buildings that take vouchers, but the time is up—leases are up. This will affect all of us. CCN does not pay all rent. They can help with one month, but then the next month, the person is in the same bind. So a lot are struggling. We will see a big problem in the next few months. LARSON said that there is no proper financial screening. This will create problems, which is a barrier. BURBIDGE said she thought the housing was subsidized. WISE said that not all the rent is subsidized. They were higher rent low income, so the subsidy helped. But if the rent goes up, the voucher cannot cover it. Also, developers get money to develop subsidized housing units, but they have time limited covenants. Then after, for example, fifteen years, they are free and clear to do whatever they want. STARK said there are a lot of federal rules, even if the housing is done through the state. The minimum covenant is fifteen years, but some counties and states can add on to this. For instance, in Snohomish County, it is forty (40) years. So the county must manage for forty years, increasing administrative costs. Without these additional rules, the units are used for fifteen years, and then the owner can turn around and sell the building even if it was built with taxpayer money. STARK added that the whole method by which we finance affordable housing is not sustainable. • WISE said that there are things local governments can do. For instance, local governments set requirements on needed parking. But every required parking spot means less housing. WISE also referred to the recently lifted City of Federal Way moratorium on multi -family housing. • BURBIDGE asked if these developments are required to pay property tax. BELLINGHAUSEN responded that he thought not. EDWARDS said that we would find out. BURBIDGE pointed out that we do not want 1970s -style "projects". WISE said that that is not what CCS builds. BURBIDGE said that every subsidized housing project gets into trouble. WISE said that that is an outdated concept. Some of them are gorgeous. They make multi-million dollar projects. There is too much money spent on them, so she would not say they are crappy. STARK agreed that many are nice, but expensive, and the cost adds up. The question is how to create affordable housing without redlining. BELLINGHAUSEN talked about individual condos. • LARSON said that we need to focus on the big picture, not just housing, but behaviors, employment, etc. DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED SUBCOMMITTEES/TASK GROUPS (Led by Task Force Chair Sharry EDWARDS)—See outlined diagrams of four proposed Task Groups and of Forum for those experiencing homelessness EDWARDS went over the outlined diagrams of four proposed Task Groups and said that at the next meeting, we would put together a packet containing a specific task and objectives for each Task Group. • GARRETT asked if the Task Groups would be held in succession. EDWARDS responded no. BELLINGHAUSEN suggested that everyone read the tasks and see what they are interested in. BRIDGEFORD read each Task Group's task. • GAINES asked if the Task Groups would be doing research or looking at solutions. EDWARDS responded that they would be looking at solutions. We have tried to give information as much as possible. Now we need to start looking at solutions. • STARK clarified that there is no handout now, but WEIDENFELD said it would be emailed to everyone. • GAINES said that Task Group One (STATE OF HOMELESSNESS IN FEDERAL WAY) sounds research - oriented, so research should be made more of the job. EDWARDS said yes and that we will give objectives for each Task Group. BELLINGHAUSEN said that some people like research. BRIDGEFORD said that Task Group One is an exception. It involves data that will go into an executive summary. This Task Group may be an exception to the general rule that the Task Groups will be looking at solutions, not doing research. GARRETT said this is why he was wondering if the Task Groups should operate in succession. Task Group Four (OTHER SERVICES AND LACK OF) leads to Three (EFFECTS ON THE COMMUNITY), which leads back to four, etc. Prevention leads to outcome. Looking at together helps explain. EDWARDS said that as she was rewriting the outlines, she also thought about succession. Task Group Two (RESOURCES/ SERVICES HOUSING/DAY) goes with Task Group Four (OTHER SERVICES AND LACK OF), but we felt that all of this was too much for one task group. STARK said that in reading the tasks, it sounds like this gives background information. Is the next step what is the policy recommendation, or will each Task Group suggest policy as a group? BELLINGHAUSEN responded that the full group will be able to be heard on each area, but the full group is too cumbersome. So the subgroups will contain interested individuals who will report to the full group as a whole. These are working groups within the larger group. Task Force members will find areas they are interested in and bring their efforts to the larger group. • EDWARDS said that we do not want to have too many rules. People need to go with their imaginations. Some people may love research, teaching, vision. We do not want to be too rigid. LARSON said that he wanted to be on the Task Force not just to create an interesting read. He wants something with teeth and legs. Let's not lose sight of the big picture. He sees homelessness as a continuum. There are many root causes, each of them a place where someone can get on the "train". We need to go step-by-step until there is sustainability there. BELLINGHAUSEN said that this is what led to the task group ideas. The task groups are needed to put together the train. LARSON said that Task Group Three (EFFECTS ON THE COMMUNITY) is the "fuel". There is apathy with a lot of folk. But homelessness affects us all one way or another. We need to get people to understand why we need to do this together, so things are not fragmented as they are now. Task Group Three says why this is important—homelessness has effects/impacts on us all, not just the person living in the woods. He agrees we need to break up, but how do we keep in mind the endgame? • EDWARDS then went over the fifth outline—about a forum for people to converse with homeless people. They can identify ways homeless people can help themselves and be empowered, such as with workforce development. We lack an employment agency in Federal Way where someone can get work for a day. • EDWARDS said that we could talk/philosophize on each topic forever if everyone has to do everything. She asked if we are missing anything. • LARSON said he did not see outreach. Retailers are interested in helping. So are landlord groups. We need outside the box thinking. (Outreach was added to Task Group One.) • EDWARDS asked where Community Court goes. LARSON said all of the above. It tries to tie it all together. EDWARDS said it would go in Task Group One. LARSON said we can do things if we are not afraid. • BELLINGHAUSEN said that every bubble on the Task Group outlines has an innovative piece for the small group to explore and bring back to the larger group for an action plan. Each bubble is a suggestion for the small groups to explore. • EDWARDS asked COE if Valley Cities has outreach. COE said they do mental health and chemical dependency treatment. They do outreach to those who cannot get to a clinic. They also have housing programs subsidized through the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). They go out to homes regularly and make sure people are okay. They have a landlord liaison project giving a "second chance" to renters. Under this program, landlords know the person is attached to an agency for support. BELLINGHAUSEN said that if we know about that, we can say what is needed to make it successful—a,b,c,d • EDWARDS said that Task Group One will look at prevention/education. it will look at earlier education—why is financial literacy not taught in high school. • LARSON talked about outreach to banks and to landlords to have them provide something. They can come in and provide something that benefits them because there would be a greater likelihood of more responsible tenants. And adult education such as at Highline can fit in. There is a continuum of life skills. What can be taught to sustain in the long term? • BELLINGHAUSEN said that we can "capture" a person in community court, when they get a first voucher, the first time in FUSION, etc. • LAPORTE said that there was a woman whom she (LAPORTE) offered (for free) to help with how to keep a clean home, be a good neighbor, etc. LAPORTE said that homelessness affects all of us. She had seen a couple in her own neighborhood with a sign saying, "Homeless—Please help." LAPORTE wanted to provide help. This is troublesome. Homelessness is pervading neighborhoods. • EDWARDS commented that she sees people on Dash Point Road with shopping carts. • LARSON cited the "age-old" saying that if you give a person a fish, you feed the person for day, but if you teach the person how to fish, you feed the person for a whole lifetime. • BELLINGHAUSEN, commenting on what LARSON said, noted that he (LARSON) has a passion for that idea, someone else for rent subsidies, etc. All these ideas can thus be explored individually in the task groups. • EDWARDS said that someone said only one candle is needed to keep them warm at night. So EDWARDS reached out to her whole group and asked them to share. The next month, she was able to walk in with bags and boxes of candles. The point is that people want to help but do not know what to do. BELLINGHAUSEN added that people want to help, get an idea, and then will do it. EDWARDS sent overher letter to the editor of February 6, 2015 that was named "Letter of the Week" in the Federal Way Mirror. See copy of letter. The letter speaks about a person named "Mary" (pseudonym). EDWARDS did not realize there were people like Mary until they met. Mary had always worked retail, but her hours were cut. Later she lost her job. She became homeless. During the first few days homeless, she realized she had to stay awake at night for safety reasons. There is danger in the encampments. She did not use drugs until she ended up in an encampment, where people give you drugs to stay awake. But sometimes moving out of there is worse. EDWARDS then had a sleeping bag drive for homeless people. "Mary" is a real person. She said that during her first couple of days homeless, she had to stay awake at night. It is physically dangerous, including from animals and the weather. One has to figure out how to survive the night. "Mary" told EDWARDS that one of the worst things was once when she was on a bench outside a sandwich shop, and the owner told her to get out because she was making the business look bad. This experience was worse for Mary than anything she had ever before experienced. She had never known homeless people before. She did get a job at Safeco Field, which hires homeless people and pays them $11 per hour. But working there, one cannot be in a shelter because one is not allowed in after a certain hour, and the Safeco work goes too late. "Mary" now lives in her vehicle. She is a beautiful person. When she went down, she went down fast. She does not see how she will ever get out of homelessness. We need to talk about what to do with increasing rent. We can only refer people to Pierce County, which has more affordable housing with older buildings. We will see rent increases every month. LARSON said he sees people in court who are trying to get out of the cycle. They still have a bench warrant out. They get into housing and catch up. They are then arrested on the bench warrant and sanctioned to jail. LARSON has heard that these people then lose their housing if they stay in jail too long. LARSON tries to tell these people to do these things, but if he punishes people, they get kicked out of housing and are back to ground zero. An example is the issue EDWARDS talked about with Safeco Field employment keeping people from getting into a shelter. There is a lack of coordination. Maybe shelters can make an exception about late entry for those working at Safeco Field. MCGLYNN said that Safeco people can sign each other into shelters. • LARSON said these are political issues beyond the City of Federal Way. People are caught. • EDWARDS said that after the Homeless Task Force concludes, there will be a larger homelessness coalition. The previous Homeless Mothers and Children Initiative (HMCI) brought the faith -based community into one room. We need to bring the whole city together, and the public too to have a conversation like this connecting everyone. • LARSON asked which task group would be identifying conundrums. BELLINGHAUSEN answered that all of them have conundrums. • LARSON said that there are crossfire and inconsistencies, which is part of the issue. EDWARDS pointed out that the "Forum" group (See Outlined Diagram) will be a group providing a forum for homeless people to share their struggles, thoughts, and ideas. • GAINES asked if each Task Force member should identify a first and second choice. EDWARDS said no, but if everyone picks one group, we may have to divvy people up. BELLINGHAUSEN said we would divvy people up. • PRICCO said that she is fearful that we not lose sight of young adults, who are the emphasis of Nexus. She wanted to make sure she joins a group that will look at the needs of young adults. BELLINGHAUSEN responded that no matter which task group she chooses, it will have a youth, young adult, and adult aspect. All bring an aspect. BRIDGEFORD said that Task Group Two (Resources/Services Housing/Day) and Task Group Four (Other Services and Lack Thereof) including a look at these services by population. BELLINGHAUSEN said that these task groups are "broad -stroke." EDWARDS said she would put PRICCO in Task Group 2 (Resources/Services Housing/Day). EDWARDS did not know about young adults. PRICCO said she can bring great research because Nexus focuses on young adults. EDWARDS said that she noticed Nexus does not get a lot of money from the City of Federal Way, and she hopes to analyze how those decisions are made. PRICCO said that Nexus would not stop its services even if they do not get City funding. WISE said that the Day Center has also not been funded this year by the City of Federal Way, and they are not stopping to provide services either. STARK commented that there are always more requests than there is money. • BELLINGHAUSEN said that next time, there would be more detail and we would start the work of what we are doing. City of Federal Way HOMELESSNESS TASK FORCE Agenda JUNE 27, 2018 8:30 am - 8:40 am Introduction and explanation of today's activities by Task Force Chair Sharry Edwards 8:40 am - 8:45 am Example Questions for Task Force Members to Ask by Task Force Vice -Chair Jeff Bellinghausen 8:45 am - 9:45 am Break out into four task groups 9:45 am - 9:55 am Brief report by each task group to full Task Force 9:55 am - 10:00 am Wrap-up by Chair Sharry Edwards 10:00 am Adjourn. Thank you for your participation! Notes from June 27, 2018 meeting of Federal Way Homelessness Task Force 8:30 AM -10:00 AM Attendance Present were: 1. Sharry Edwards (Chair), Community Health Nurse/Governing Board Member/Board Member, Kaiser Permanente/Federal Way Community Caregiving Network/Ashley House 2. Jeff Bellinghausen (Vice -Chair), Captain/Community Affairs Officer, South King Fire & Rescue 3. Chantel Arnone, Emergency Department Clinical Manager, CHI Franciscan Health 4. Sarah Bridgeford, CDBG/HS Coordinator, City of Federal Way Community Development Department 5. Jeanne Burbidge, Former Mayor/Deputy Mayor/City Councilmember, City of Federal Way 6. Robin Corak, CEO, Multi -Service Center 7. Dan Dizon, Executive Director of Human Resources and Community Relations, Federal Way Public Schools 8. Willa Gaines, Advisory Board Member, Reach Out 9. Lawrence Garrett, Executive Director, Advancing Leadership 10. Byron Hiller, Property Management Division President/President,, ColdwelI Banker Commercial Danforth/FUSION Board of Directors 11. Peggy LaPorte, Executive Director, FUSION 12. David Larson, Judge, City of Federal Way Municipal Court 13. Kimberly McGlynn, Operations Manager, King County Library System 14. Alyson Moon, Community Impact Liaison, Mary's Place 15. Stephan Neal, Deputy Chief, City of Federal Way Police Department 16. Lynn Ormsby, Advisory Board Member, Sound Alliance/Federal Way Day Center 17. Shelley Pauls, Liaison, Federal Way faith community 18. Shelly Pricco, Executive Director, Nexus Youth and Families 19. Stacie Scarpaci, Probation Supervisor, City of Federal Way Municipal Court 20. Ken Stark, Vice -Chair, City of Federal Way Human Services Commission 21. Jeff Watson, Community Services Manager, City of Federal Way Community Development Department Absent Were: 22. Elric Bey, Shelter Operator, New Hope Christian Fellowship 23. Angela Coe, Regional Operations Director, Valley Cities Behavioral Health 24. Jack Dovey, US Carrier Relations and Business Development, GPS Lockbox 25. Tom Medhurst, Member/President and CEO, City of Federal Way Planning Commission/L & L Nursery Supply, Inc.* 26. Rick Miller, Pastor, New Hope Christian Fellowship 27. Jackie Muth, Partner, Mahrt & Associates 28. Rebecca Stephens, Community Resource and Referrals Center Program Manager, United States Department of Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System 29. Yarden Weidenfeld, Senior Policy Advisor, City of Federal Way Mayor's Office 30. Dan Wise, Director of Homeless Services, Catholic Community Services in King County *Resigned from Task Force Proceedings Introduction and Description of Meeting Structure. Chair Sharry Edwards welcomed everyone and invited Lawrence Garrett to make an announcement regarding Advancing Leadership. Lawrence Garrett announced that he is resigned as of July 31St. Over the past year Advancing Leadership has had a focus on homelessness and 16 applicants for the next year identified homelessness as a priority. Advancing Leadership may be a resource or potential project partner in the coming year. Task Force members broke into four (4) task groups as follows: • Task Group 1: o Robin Corak, Chair o Sarah Bridgeford o Jeanne Burbidge o David Larson o Ken Stark • Task Group 2: o Dan Dizon, Co -Chair o Allyson Moon, Co -Chair o Byron Hiller o Willa Gaines o Peggy LaPorte o Lynn Ormsby o Shelly Pricco • Task Group 3 o Stacie Scarpacci, Chair o Jeff Bellinghausen o Lawrence Garrett o Stephan Neal o Shelley Pauls • Task Group 4: o Chantel Arnone, Co -Chair o Kim McGlynn, Co -Chair o Jeff Watson Task groups briefly reviewed what they discussed and identified chairs/co-chairs. Chair Sharry Edwards and Vice Cahir Jeff Bellinghausen answered questions and completed an example of how work may proceed in relation to a specific topic. Z CITY OF Federal Way TASK FORCE ON HOMELESSNESS Task Group 1: State of Homelessness in Federal Way TASK GROUP ONE: STATE OF HOMELESSNESS IN FEDERAL WAY Each task group will be drafting written materials of its work. These materials will be used to craft the report to Mayor Ferrell. The report will include findings about the nature of homelessness, conclusions about causes and changes to homelessness in Federal Way and in general, identifying where services and gaps in service exist, and what has worked in other communities. Per the charge memorandum, the report will also include a strategic plan of action to guide the Federal Way community in its response to homelessness. Throughout the process, information will be shared with the other task groups and edited in the end to create a cohesive document. More details will be provided as to the format in the future. While working on the specific task, each task group is asked to keep in mind and address as appropriate, the following questions especially when making recommendations for the strategic plan of action: • How best to reduce homelessness and the risk for homelessness; • How best to serve our homeless residents; • Roles that could be played by various entities; • Public awareness; and • Definition of success. Task: Craft an overview of homelessness, both regionally and locally, from root causes to the extent of the problem. Address, at minimum, the following: • What does the data show as to the number of and the demographics of people experiencing homelessness and/or at imminent risk of homelessness in Federal Way and regionally? • From the data and research, what are the causes of homelessness and causes of the increases in homelessness experienced in Federal Way and regionally? • What does the data and research show as to the barriers faced by people experiencing homelessness? • From conversations with people experiencing homelessness in Federal Way, share anecdotes and correlations to the data and research. Consider addressing the following: o What is their experience of the state of homelessness in Federal Way? How has it changed and/or increased? o What has caused more people to become homeless? o What are the barriers faced by people experiencing homelessness? 41k CITY OF Federal Way TASK FORCE ON HOMELESSNESS Task Group 2: Resources & Services (Housing and Day Services) TASK GROUP Two: Resources & Services (Housing and Day Services) Each task group will be drafting written materials of its work. These materials will be used to craft the report to Mayor Ferrell. The report will include findings about the nature of homelessness, conclusions about causes and changes to homelessness in Federal Way and in general, identifying where services and gaps in service exist, and what has worked in other communities. Per the charge memorandum, the report will also include a strategic plan of action to guide the Federal Way community in its response to homelessness. Throughout the process, information will be shared with the other task groups and edited in the end to create a cohesive document. More details will be provided as to the format in the future. While working on the specific task, each task group is asked to keep in mind and address as appropriate, the following questions especially when making recommendations for the strategic plan of action: • How best to reduce homelessness and the risk for homelessness; • How best to serve our homeless residents; • Roles that could be played by various entities; • Public awareness; and • Definition of success. Task: Assess and analyze services and places that provide services related to housing and day services (including locations). Address, at minimum, the following: • What are the available resources and services for residents of Federal Way? Thinking of the region and ease of access for Federal Way residents, where do gaps exist? What duplications, if any, exist in the continuum of services available specifically to residents of Federal Way? Please address the following: o Continuum of Services: Address prevention, diversion, day services, shelter services (emergency and other), transitional housing, and the different permanent housing models. o Location: Where are the services located: Federal Way, other locations? Please pay attention to ease of access including location in Federal Way, nearness to Federal Way, and/or ease of access via public transportation. o Population served: When considering what services exist, gaps in service, and recommendations for services and/or strategies to address local needs, address the unique needs of the population served by a service such as youth and young adults, families, veterans, etc. o Best practices: please consider what other communities are doing regionally or nationally with respect to the continuum of services. What has worked? What has not worked? Why? • What are the funding needs to fill gaps in resources and services and/or gaps in access? What role could various entities play in filling these gaps? What are the priorities of funders of homeless services including the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington State, and King County as examples? CITY OF Federal Way TASK FORCE ON HOMELESSNESS Task Group 3: Effects on the Community TASK GROUP THREE: EFFECTS ON THE COMMUNITY Each task group will be drafting written materials of its work. These materials will be used to craft the report to Mayor Ferrell. The report will include findings about the nature.of homelessness, conclusions about causes and changes to homelessness in Federal Way and in general, identifying where services and gaps in service exist, and what has worked in other communities. Per the charge memorandum, the report will also include a strategic plan of action to guide the Federal Way community in its response to homelessness. Throughout the process, information will be shared with the other task groups and edited in the end to create a cohesive document. More details will be provided as to the format in the future. While working on the specific task, each task group is asked to keep in mind and address as appropriate, the following questions especially when making recommendations for the strategic plan of action: • How best to reduce homelessness and the risk for homelessness; • How best to serve our homeless residents; • Roles that could be played by various entities; • Public awareness; and • Definition of success. Task: Identify how the following categories affect the community at large. What are the costs to the community? Where can you see change? What do you suggest the City do? Address, at minimum, the following: • How are the following affecting the quality of life, public health, and safety of the general public in Federal Way: o Trash; o Library use by people experiencing homelessness; o Panhandling; o Crime/trespassing by homeless people; o Vehicle residency; o Encampments; o Emergency room use/misuse; and/or o Other. ■ How can these best be alleviated? ■ What are environmental concerns raised by homelessness in Federal Way? How can they best be alleviated? ■ Are there changes in zoning that would help alleviate some effects on the community of homelessness? What are they? ■ What are ways that the police and code compliance can help alleviate the effects on the community of homelessness? ■ What new state laws or city ordinances might be needed for any of the above? ■ What are funding needs to help alleviate effects of homelessness in Federal Way? What role could various entities play? ■ What are other communities doing with respect to alleviating the effects of homelessness on the community? What has worked? What has not worked? Why? ■ How would success be defined? A'A CITY OF Federal Way TASK FORCE ON HOMELESSNESS Task Group 4: Other Services TASK GROUP FOUR: OTHER SERVICES Each task group will be drafting written materials of its work. These materials will be used to craft the report to Mayor Ferrell. The report will include findings about the nature of homelessness, conclusions about causes and changes to homelessness in Federal Way and in general, identifying where services and gaps in service exist, and what has worked in other communities. Per the charge memorandum, the report will also include a strategic plan of action to guide the Federal Way community in its response to homelessness. Throughout the process, information will be shared with the other task groups and edited in the end to create a cohesive document. More details will be provided as to the format in the future. While working on the specific task, each task group is asked to keep in mind and address as appropriate, the following questions especially when making recommendations for the strategic plan of action: • How best to reduce homelessness and the risk for homelessness; • How best to serve our homeless residents; • Roles that could be played by various entities; • Public awareness; and • Definition of success. Task: Assess and analyze services and places that provide services to people experiencing homelessness in Federal Way and identify gaps? Address, at minimum, the following: ■ What is the availability of the following services for residents of Federal Way who are experiencing homelessness? o Workforce development; o Healthcare ■ Behavioral/mental health; ■ Dental; ■ Substance abuse; and ■ Emergency services. o Domestic Violence ■ Services for victims; and ■ Treatment for perpetrators; o Food resources; o Education; o Financial literacy; o Legal resources; and o Other services not listed. • What duplications, if any, exist in the above services? • What gaps exist in the above services? E�: D C) a ,< O C T O _ � O � � o m - z (n D � � r D v D Z CTCD CD O a � � 0 o T Q � x N m D n I 70 77 � CD 3 F. N O ^N O (�) O 3 iZ n n �� =j- �. O cn G O S2o 3 n O 3 v Z) l< Fn ci 0 6 Q. 0 C Z W N Occ== e cocf) m 5 -'i _ N CO(c cn U) CD 7 v _> > mo COD m D U � o o � � �aomm� ID cn in o j j cn C ID '-`000a 3 C m a)CDC�_0 �Cl) (1)0 c cn _ zy zr CD =. OC o n. CD vc m a(0 CD�:�� O O O O E a m CCD v vc a0a0.wo Q c c N m moo m � - a`n`nm(n v v a wcc (D (D (� v oo °c v CD W CZ Q cn O D O 0 ' CL v cn 7 7 7 O fn 0 0 0 0 0 3 cn (0 cn m cD a o -°o c(n Q �c')!� CD n cn o c o. o Q CL c ZT � m O CD C C c CD Q S Q CD 0 N v O 7 O (D Z3 CL c v 0 M m rnX \V 0 C CD cn 3 ^^31 l< CD 2) D CD 0 I I (� 0CD CD wOL)I CD CQ —. C7 --i � CD t � t 3 0 3 CD rn � O w O n�3_ � N w O 41 CQ �, O O _0 Q O (n 0 -0 CQ M Cn (n r -F , V .v O 0 CD O wCD CD -o N X O CD ccn (n z3 c r+ -. O O CD < Q n CD 3 O (Q � CD �- — _ CD CD n. ,--q CD (n O V cn CD (n Cn (Q Q mO :3 e-+.00 m O O O N Z3 0 CD =h CD O = O cnCD z O X �' 3. �� O C m (n O m o cn w �• ids O J \L1 /� CD 0 � `� � N � C7 O c O C C/n� G • CD CD r+C —. U r=-3+0. CD �.to O cn Q • CD Cnr-{- � C C Z ,-- _ cD a) CQ in c (� Q = m Q 3 CD ... , cn vi =� CD 0 0 O .K<�D :3 �� O w �IVlii .4y CD (n_ Cc 0 ^ CD CL 0 � Q � r� cn to O (n � _ � • C CD � � • � � CD O 0 • — • <n cn 0 cc CDc: D .- + CD 0 0 O w cn to �• CL C �• m 00 m rnX \V 0 C CD cn 3 ^^31 l< CD " O O cr CD Q 0 C M C M CD CD N O CSD I n -6 ° O Er DJ != `- CD to M n i 0 o =3 3 -0 x -0 M M Q N M = CD CL CD N' O r cCD 2 0 'CD � CD -; CA N O O �. 1CD 3 -lh 0 cn m ;� cn N r* O i� C = (D CA 0 X O CD �+ CD cr =' O Q 00 O CL m O Dm o n CL 0 CD crN cD � o cin =' 0 cn `D r - 0 cr N C Q 0 CD � CL Z N• O CSD I N T r CD O DJ Q q 'a O " 0 CD 0 O CD �cDo CD M cCD 2 CD noQXIL ( (A CA N O 3 0 o, cn `D r - 0 Q 0 N� O cD N o CL Z CL lwm c cc m O CD w O M 0 90 CA CD N N , O CDV eXt z o m z Q D z 0 22 22D 0 X Le Q A 41. (D 3 0 CD n aD CD (n U) N� CD Q_ CD O +1 zr O 3 CD CD CD cn w 7 D� CQ N O O 4 N O N O N O O 4 N O N O O c0 m m x a CD CD n Q T 0 CD N S• (n • o (C) e--� �D 0 o _O CD's a � _ z o E rn =re--� O z CD 3 `� zi D mCD 0 �+ CD y M CA CD 0 O Nr+ N �+ 0 Q C CD X m cn C D < O o = o 0cD m O m N as (D (D (D3 Q' Q R. CDn m CD C CD 0 o CD ccnCD n rt• e --f CD (i)9. 0 _ e -t 3 3 N o' Q o Z < cQ 0 (Q 0 M < CD C) 0 CD m00 O CD FD �K 0 0 = r♦ v o U) C �. <O �_ ;1. _ � O (j) a 0 a CD CD 0 Q CD D� �'' G7 0• M n m N' O V C) O C D C CD 7 O A ,i 0 CD CD 3 m r CD 5 r -l- cQ v o 0 CD 9 cn 0o =r m O ( 3 � O O 'CD ^ '(n V+ `D /�/ w �• CD � I rf O cn �. r� r♦ CD =3 N Q O < CD O CD =r --i CD. CD CD O C7 1 O 3 O CD (n CD O a- =) CD CD 0 %< w cD 3 w CD 0 A (71 N O 0 * �o = D c0 ca 0 CD =r rr 0 r 0 �p c CD N 0 00)\ l< l< 0 0 CD 0 ? CD 0 jA 3 2-3 O IAF SIJ CD SIJ =r -p- cn cn0 CL N m 9 cn 0o =r m O ( 3 � O O 'CD ^ '(n V+ `D /�/ w �• CD � I rf O cn �. r� r♦ CD =3 N Q O < CD O CD =r --i CD. CD CD O C7 1 O 3 O CD (n CD O a- =) CD CD 0 %< w cD 3 w CD 0 A (71 N O 0 * O = D c0 ca (n 0 c CD l< l< 0 0 CD 9 cn 0o =r m O ( 3 � O O 'CD ^ '(n V+ `D /�/ w �• CD � I rf O cn �. r� r♦ CD =3 N Q O < CD O CD =r --i CD. CD CD O C7 1 O 3 O CD (n CD O a- =) CD CD 0 %< w cD 3 w CD 0 A (71 N O 0 m x 0 (D v m c Q CD v D CD M a X V O - - �C� - D _ cop m D c C)C CD 3 3 m c v 3 5 CD v o o or � CD -h �� � 3 v C: 0 o 0 0 m p -n0o v K� 2 o O �o -� O r �' (D '� ,--1- CD � CD CD N � � � 0 3 sv D j ,{ �- � CSD CD (n N O O CD CD CL sv cn � �o � o CO) �� O � CD O 07 CD "1 z �CD :3CL 3 0' �_ CD U)o 5.-0 ONE CDD 3'CD Qx 0) � 0) 0) OD OD OD CO) D M i c - -, N (D m N O d C 0 0 N N O CP N cD ON 0. O =3-w C N C1 (1)z CL O. CD tn3 NN wo- (u O_ _c C W X O cn 0. ,O+ X CD ^� O O� CD ? O 0 (D = '� Q O CD CD _ < O n O 0 O O (n O O 3 m 3 O n CD r -r 3 (D O O in O CD CD O C7 n 0 0 O O O 7 �. (no' 0 (D _ `< CD � N n O CD CT O ° N O N O O O ( O /1� CCD UOi (� CA � � = X (n COD CD CD 3 CA N53, G� CD CD CD O O �'`�< CL o sv _ 77, 1 90 30 CL 3 er m � L c Q N O %Za T1 O CL m 3 to cD. C CA N VI! MN O CA ' i.f. A• 0 r♦ .,. rMLO ' D U) 04 c m D' 1D v 7 0 0 3 c U) c CDz N O v 0 C7 0 c 7 0 0 3 CD 0 0 c 0 w CD CD �T V 0 m X CSD CD 0 cQ O 3 CD CD cn cn CD cn D D o0 _ K O D D � Z S T. 3 v 5 v3�' O CD C7 -* CD � :4; O CD �D CD CL D z =3 N w w G N M n CD _� -0 (D cn CD v v -0 n :3 =3 _ �D O O Oto M ` m m y k CL O 0 �� �^w `J_ CD. CD in CD '0) V O -01 CD CD r� CD VI O +1 O 3 CD CD cn CD 0 m N O V 0 O z 0 m z D r D z O Z7 m D 69 69 0') W O O O N O O N O v (D O N Ll V N O CA W O N 4�h. CA OD CDb b bO N O O O O EaN O O O 3 O O N E. x Q. 3. < to O! r 7 n O O CD B Q -� to M O 00 :3O� Q CD O cn 0 cn �* 0 n K Mel 0 O C Z7 —<, 0 CD O CD �} N O �F V CD z (D r -+L o �-rt- O D D O CQ o < CD CD(n 0 o -.1r--r 0 22 r --+L C7 m CD OX Cn CD cno 3 v CD O� o O O CD ,. 3 3CD 3. _ o Q (nCD m �• (n 90 n (n oho r - +L -f � CD 0 O CD a Q cn 0) CD cr �. (. A N >> �CD 0 0 C 7 CD a N' N w � O 0CD c cn O CD ax CD CD CD o 0 �(D fl) D a X CD O O a C CD v cn a c 3 v — N_ C 00 CD a S CD COo Ow O A 7 7 a CD CD D cn or g CD O ,nom a ? v v CD Q CD _. CD 0C: c � 3CD V) CD w a o a o c O CD 0 00 o CD v � 0 cn CODS CD o a — 0 3 N m 0 O 1 �N co V CD 40 cD cD c0. 0'" O O CD 0. � O �_ CD -, IV > > C/) CD CDO / C/D� /CD CL V n 3 CD O �. C✓ CD rf CD CL (D cn ii/ �1\ CLC O CL p o v ii Q CD 3 � O CL O M co cn O QLcr O N. ■ 0 O N O C o i CJ1 O 0 0 CDN O 0. DD En n CD S N O � C CD a cD �O' � N o �o c D c CD ET O N E x cn cn N COD 0 -0 CD N � � a a X CD O O a C CD a v. N N N a N {v 3 C _N C O m a 2(D C co � W O U) a CD CL CD c D m MILIN CT v o a � m v CD Cr - CD -" CD o � M c C 3 m CD cn N CD C4 a a a o _ o cn (nn o o m v � z O N c a_ (CD o a - o 3U) O L�J ma CD ml CD !"h D ic CD CL 0 O �/s� CY m ^D CL ^m^ iii. !-F O O Q. s D 0. iii 0 N. n O Q CD _•o CD rF � rF N O 0.o O N T O — o M D D v, 'A D CD z. T ■ O O 0 N O 0 N O 0 i C31 O rF rF cn V . 3}� 0^ CD rsh itti^^J V' w O CD rh O O CL w N • cn �CD 0a) cnc SCD p in' N O 0 v � sCD c c CD 0 CD E x U) N CD CD CDD O � ? CD N � 7 Q a x CD o 0 a CD CD v �? c a v v v c 3 v — N_ 'd c 0 (D d 2 m C C? O p_ 3 O CD a I m 0 m o v v CD - m �CD o 0 0 c� c 3 m mm cn cn CD wa oQ o c o CD 0 (nn O o v � sCD o �a � CD o a — vi � o 3 CD N YV CD CD c0 �D 0 CD 0. cr O —h O CD > D �(D CD �CO If r♦ CL 'C^ CL v+ 3 Q 0 �. m •D CD ^ \^V V CL O • Q 0 O Q o 07 CD CD 3 O \ O ^� o ice. O cnO CD O PQ O QL 0 N 0 0 r N O C o i U� O O 0 CD n N O M (n Z.PWN— O O D D D C --i n U) cn n ma--Icn: c c N o 3 3 c N (n !n C V = o - cc v -0 co o cn CL O o c m I 7� r O n 0 cnQ 3 j v a o O a 3 q 3 CD o mo m m x x a _ in (-DIDD (D .0 C:Q m < n ,< o: O O (D CD CD CD 3 :3 c O O(/D� COC 7 O < CD X Si 7 = N O C) 0 v Q CD CD v a N o �D m -0 �. s�� D o m m In cn cn m �(°v 2D x ?< tin 3 (D CCD amv0� D Q = >C O = �•< - -a r a >�c0-0o D W v m n CD D '_"► lD : CC (D U) I--- C o �?oOpO N �. a c-, cn D0 CD Dao r D o_cn v o �; c o v v C co (n D m 0 CD v 0 O `n < = O X D`GCD o _ a cn o m O v iy o v —� o CD CD D o in D �O O XD T 0-0 O (D CD v m CD o - CD 3 U v °' o m O < c o O D G7 O CD O m zT :3 N Q w =r t O O O O CA T� M N S m CL m to N to vi �: v N O C En 1..f. En O h r=r cn C, (D w PAIL J \s O e --h CD CD CD ^^3' CL O 11 C) CilO L• AN Cn cn -m 3 0 CD D CO CD U) N� CD CL C CD O O 3 CD CD CD w cn 0 O D CD cn m � CD 3 D o v _ o CD CD 3 c CD Cl) � 3 n CD C Cn FD CD m O 3 a -p .O C m O N CD 3 C o CD m D 7� O Q v a cD o = c ° c N cn 3 3 n. (D O � 7 CD ar a o' v CD O C7-9 CD CD 0 a m CD :3oC CDCD T. CD 0 n o CD n . CD 3 av CD �. v � cr o 0 0 m CDm o a C CD � O CCD COD . m 3 C CDo a -- CD 0 CD 0 CD O m o. 0 CD 0 cn MEN on O 1. W W� cn r+ 2) r* C y 3• _• o -0 CD v, n N o O n (p O 35 (n m (p z N � D CD D U) o C -0 � G;o,.+ O 0 �♦ in D CD >x CD cn (D m (n � o r--� g 3. O �O/� \/ ) S O cDCD '(n ( / m A. V 3 3. (D o' 0 o Q CD N (D f.-P.•� 3 m c 0 n a : C '(D 0(Q cD `< O 0 o o CD CD CDa CD CDCD Q ..D 3 �' 3 CD `� CD CCD CD C2 C1 N N x ° Cl) � � ai CD (!) D C7 ccp < cp O-0 "a cCn m rt cn ( 2) v .+ CD 3 O cn OG CD c (D CD CCD D m .. m Q- c3 CD CD (D N � LU . O m �° � " m 10 a N 3 =r Q CD CD CD h CD N O N p 'TI 0 CD 3 = CL M < Q N �O 3 `G mC m� (gyp m CDC) °' 3 a CD n 3= 3 m = m m O 3 ° ° ° �' 0- a cn n a O CD Q- cQ w �. cn �' v D �' Q =3CD in cn CD m �' 3 cru CD O C< cO m c 0 rn cn Q < `° - m 3 p cin �= �' m 3 0 v m u CD o cmn N 0 a) CD l< o f 0 CD cn v D c 0- �- c 3 O a (D C Q CD D -' 3 ccD �- (!) r • Cn Q v O Q.. Q Q (n -- -n O n C= (n MEN on O 1. W W� cn r+ 2) r* C y 3• _• o -0 CD v, n N o O n (p O 35 (n m (p z N � D CD D U) o C -0 � G;o,.+ O 0 �♦ in D CD >x CD cn (D m (n � o r--� g 3. O �O/� \/ ) S O cDCD '(n ( / m A. V 3 3. (D o' 0 o Q CD N (D f.-P.•� 3 m c 0 n a : C '(D 0(Q cD `< O 0 o o CD CD CDa CD CDCD Q ..D 3 �' 3 CD `� CD CCD CD C2 C1 5 C o CD <T rncn J ` D N 0 c7 O (n m z O CD D CSD (no p o Q CD O U CD F --#- o CD 3 v CL 0 Er 5 U) (D m CD CD (n -ID 3 OIn `V � (D 0 c ID F ( 3 7 ca O C o a 3 CD CD (D' 0 C n c� O O O m cn m m cCD 3 0 (� O 3 a �" CD = 3 67 (n v O CSD CCD � r+ Cn CCD CCD m CD D cn c(n in �-' � n (D c Z 3 � N m o m o v < 0 o Q Q� my m o o n'� -0 c°o m cn v %< 3� (n 3 vi �o CD 3 y� o. co v V< o Q-� =� 3 �o 0 3 c �. CCD -,, 0 m° CD �, Q n < O N N. Co O o CD CD c CD cn (D O 3 (o CD N cn CD _Q (o OO CD 0 (D 0CD N w CD CD N CD cn Q CD (n N fl- N v N CDD ' CDL. ,-+ CD N -1 Q O CD c(n ( � Q m O O cD 0 X, �• CD p n CD O 0 v O n CD m 0 0O '� '� O O- � C o^ c c ` ` ` ` ` c CD O D = C( 0 \ \ \ c cin con �• CD C o CD <T rncn J ` D N 0 c7 O (n m z O CD D CSD (no p o Q CD O U CD F --#- o CD 3 v CL 0 Er 5 U) (D m CD CD (n -ID 3 OIn `V � (D 0 c ID F ( 3 7 ca O C o a 3 CD CD (D' 0 �• Q � n C7 C7 3.O<< r+ Cn 3 cn � n v CD � W �• � 0 m D vi CD mac, o� CD �_ 0 m° Q �- n cD _ CSD O (D � C 2 CD (n v ' 3 cD �- Q co m � m �, o O cD 0 X, �• o v m 0 CD '� '� O O- � Q� o^ X- cn Q o CD O = C( 0 o a c cin con �• r. w 1 `� N O CD to CD CD m C. C o CD <T rncn J ` D N 0 c7 O (n m z O CD D CSD (no p o Q CD O U CD F --#- o CD 3 v CL 0 Er 5 U) (D m CD CD (n -ID 3 OIn `V � (D 0 c ID F ( 3 7 ca O C o a 3 CD CD (D' V tU 0 N CL CD �0 Cf) � _. Q r•r fD O C CD r N c Q w (D O = CD CL m- CD CD 0(c mn Q3 Do 3 O W CD o =r �. n m n (G C v CL S -n c0 cn � v v v Q . 0 o o o C< C N cn �O O. O m Z CD o w CD ° o 0 O N N n a c a n � � D En _ m o o 3 c m co a D =. 3 N O � � Q 0 6 O K N � O N O CD Q 0 0 0 C n � E a CL o CD o CD w 0 CD c � :3 c a o_ CD cn C7 v, o c C C CD 73 (n 0. Er cn C17 0 0 o a 07 � m v a o n U) CD � m CD v Q m � c s CL m o y O O CD a Q N O p N NW o N � � � C N � W � � � tai •. Q C • O p O p O p O p CN) W o p o p O -a O 'O O 0 = 0- o < O -a rt L* N U) n' C L O cD n y C1 CO/1 CD N CA -h C c� N W o O O CD 0 0 CD • 0 n rf O v O z m m m � z D r D n z ♦ J O (n. O (n D 77 in c CD CD O ° S 3 C O m � ^ 01' �cn �. S ''^^ O V/ - CD rfcn n 3 (D 3 C (. O 7 O CD ^3 9<0 0 T O D CD< M Vn vi 0 O_0 O O C a i� owl C/) Z N D � 0 x° N 0 C7 N O o M 0— D ~ Q �= 2 O = vim) �_ 3 CD Cn a CD O O Q C-) 0 o C ,z �± CD � D) v m n m UD X O co CD O m N P_ a CD W /rF n c m CD D = . / A Cc oCD m Q a (D m 01 c cD 3 o Q n N C CL � O �• CD V c v i CL c a N CD o O CD M _ O w Ul c m -4 �r n CD CD N YL C ( CD o a v N N o N O v N O d) 2 -1 N D N W Cn d) —4 00 (o O 0 O -06 CD m _ -4 O x O c I ,_A N N . � 0 Q CD cn1 �± CD i Q O i CD P_ W /rF (D = Q� iY \AV . / A Cc Cn m Q �• < N 01 s CD Q ui s �• CDD c i CL c _ C I , V C O Q / v� C � -4 �r ^ G YL C o n N \ . O ap =TO y -,, 3 x =3 (D CD cn cn (Q O cD 3 cn C,J Cal 0 n. 1 CD w CD :. 0 CD Z N n D N mCD °0(c � 74� o Cp < � e CCD C7 -4 (m a a m c 2cnCrc - CD C- <1� gin° ° ? v < $ CD o ° o m CD cn ° n o via�Q)- o N S :<3 -o m09 E CD cn 5i:Ci En a ID L m m- o cn OL CD C M O c d CD i� C U• -O � CD m 81�_ 0- o O m 3°vc cpm m =r a � (n c0 O O T. Q cn ° , s �. °CL po o o o j�;-m� N S C ~ (n CD < O a CD o ti o :Dchd ry � ° m a CD v � m < � D -c c a m w_ 3v CD v o in a=77o y N� m c c 3 o � ti -o (D o CD m T m o _ ��3 ° � m (n O U Q 0) Cn J o-oCD �Nm C-) DmW 0 `n C, :3 D Cn X w C (n `cn 7 m gC-. O in , m sll g cn o Q CO 7 CQ m CSD 'Na C2 O O S S 3o m ° 0 N cn m c cD S ID m m D 7 O�. O m ( to O CSD 6� O m C 7 (7 m L p� cmn 3 CD o CD iv m CT 5 ;r�v OL c :3 °o 0 9 O 3 O CD N CD Cn =r O CD Cn Cn CD N X�l CD n CQ (n D C: ::*� 0-0 Cn TN to CD YL CD OG w = TOCD V Al N O -0 :3 = _ CD ? CD CDCDo CD CD CD CD OOC CD G 0 CD U) O = :3 n O CD o�m0 C �3 U CD CD :3 CD I N N N 1 C N CDQ cn CD CD O (Q O Q CD c M. ,-I- cn --rcn C cn O O cn O ^D l - cn Y+/ 0 3 Ch O. 0 h C N CL c O M 2) ■ ■m- cn CD n. CD CD Q r- 0 CD Z 0 CD (D CD CL U) 0 (n M* Alk-, 0 rF CD CL 0 CD X. rF 0 CD CD rh CD 0 0 I 0 U) 0 U) f0r--f- 0 CD rh ^QL V, rnQL V 3 Q 0 m N 0 4 A N O 0 CD CQ CD U) N� CD Q C CD 11 O O 3 CD CD CD n O C 0 Lei, O c m C) m m x CD R ■ n C `G CD n O cn CD 9, Cl) .-r CD Cn O C 0 CD cn ■ It - CD CD sv Cn C 0 C CD ■ n M. L Cn CD cn O Cn CD cn rl `G CD cn up go 3 _ Q `G CD cn �• o V N (n (n 3 O Oz CDT m m Q cn > D �• z O CD O m D O 3 CD Ocn CD O cn --h (n3 3 �. C (n o CD0 CD (D m .3. �. 0 T. FD 0 n CD Q90 C7 O 3 cn m rF 3 n 3 cD //�� a CD a 3 m a CD �F CD U) Z 00 �m N mo V 7 = O (n C CD C c. 0 v �a m m x N - O O CD N CD O DCD 2(n O 3 CD cn CD O v � cfl`J a 0 v w m 0- a V N c CD N CD _--i 3 N N N O N O N O N O N 00 N O 2 N Q C c DCD G� m Col n vCL" O � D v m i o o G ? S �. o to O C) O c O � � O _ n _ O N O �. C. cn N CD m CD CD C. 7 YI 0S O � En �. lD 13 O 14 cD C. C 3 CL C� tC 3 OinQ �. CD O Q e--1- (n CD CD X CD Ln. CD' �• ::3 / N ` . '\'V ^^ V, =r O cn 3 cD CD VJ CD /cn y/ (J :3 CD cD 3 cn (n = m O r+ 77, CD r+ 0 CCD e-+ r+ CSD aI CO r+ 0 CD n cn N O V C7 0 z m z D r D Z 0 ;U m D Z7 DCD G� m Col n O v D O � D v m i o o G ? S �. o C) G)^D N O c O � � O _ n _ O N O �. C. cn N CD m CD CD C. 7 YI 0S O � En �. lD 13 O 14 cD C. C 3 CL C� tC 3 OinQ �. CD O Q e--1- (n CD CD X CD Ln. CD' �• ::3 / N ` . '\'V ^^ V, =r O cn 3 cD CD VJ CD /cn y/ (J :3 CD cD 3 cn (n = m O r+ 77, CD r+ 0 CCD e-+ r+ CSD aI CO r+ 0 CD n cn N O V C7 0 z m z D r D Z 0 ;U m D Z7 cn Z w N 005 =- CD (n N CD Amo 3-0 X `< O mNo=ate w � .Or -1-4 -.jp K 3 CD D CD D v v a cn 3 cn_.a m -' 3 a CD CD o m� v o c = � _ 3 (n v o� cn o CD n CD "a � CD sZ cn � v O _ v CD cQ '� O CDD caw 3 o m < 3 D o o cn o a •• CD 0. T' ' 07 CD C1 X CD 0CDCDo� N CO C) 5CD mm o< v o� 3 _ CD C'o o n0o3 N cn _~3ina� N 7 p cn O -!vo N ° .n 2 S = N 3v�3mCD cn O O O rz CT < T. w _ CD N CD Z' -0. < o cc M - OCCD cn CS 7 O r -r ° cn Zv cn.3 �a0 v O �� cn a) m �m O = �m0CDccn m < N CD cn ": c° O O CD Q Q co a Q CD o con cn cn CD m < 0 v C7 CD3 oWo a 0 a cn v 2 ::3-0 — sv ( Q D ::3 N CD E; D cl) csa sZ C CD o OL CD 0o v u,3 F D m cfl tl = o a C o O o Eoo C'p <. cm CD CD a cQ� CCD O. i o a X' vo Q o m a CD n3 nZ72 CD o CL CD CD O CD cn o CL @ o - � O cn a CD (n CD o w 0 CD CD cn CD m < in CDcr M v =3 O =r =3 D 3 m _ CD -0 O O Q cfl Q O 0 Q 0 CD m • Q (n (Q C/)O 21 =v o v CD � CD -0 C/)CDCLQ = CD == Q CL � 0-0 - 70 -•. CD n `n Q (n 0 o N � C W (1 0 v m X. 0 N Cn 3. O _ (Q rN•r 0 cn C: c ol CD CD =T 0 0 O O cn C � N 0 7� c 5 cn O C y 3.O C CD CA R. z CD CD X cn CD O C 3 -, S 0 O 3 ca CD CD CD M (n X CD 7 to � N o w O CD O � cn r� m X. 0 3 lD N N 0 �D 0 A Ak m X. 0 CD ; 0 r�n cn v , CD �1 C CDcn cn A� m D cQ S C CD 0 CD C: CD =3 Q U) 2 0 Z 0 cQ cn CD CD CD CD CL 0 W, n 0 cn N o• in X CD 3 cQ c (Q i0 0 ' 3 cr 0 O rF CID (C.CD \V CD CDQ CDQ e --F 0 CD cn 11 CD Q CDw e --f CD 0 ID0 cn N O a C/) Z N O'OnD c mo m � c n a m ID O 3 Cn j (D CD CD N CD C (D 3 0 CCD CD N X En 7 3 O v _ CD ill Cb n cn N — � CD V V d � O cn O c _ 3 c/) CD 0o -+CD 3 07c CD a) CD n o a m c 0 5 cfl W0 3 sv m n � m c in cn 0 0 3 N a T. Cn ^ 2 � O N n O N V CD CD d N CD a v v D O 3 CD CD 3 R CD m CD CD v 3 D c v N CD CCD C3� CD CD 0 CD N O V N TT N NCD CL ` J �� n =. C O (C) �0 o CD \J CO -1 CD C CD {� (D V I Cl) ■ ■ o C cr N E Z O CD c� CD N Cn CD 2 N CD 0 U) 2 3 cn CD CD CD r`► V G Q N cn CD C (n ty :Q (p cn Xi to 0 .-� o _O n `` (D e--f- c o o ® (n W �• n CD c3 CD Ocn CD CSD 4 o 0) c C/) 0 Cr _0 OD CD c � Q CDo to n N D X 0 CD N O V � C O = c m 0 m 3 Cu o D. o a 0 0 -0 0 CD 3 O CD m N O cn Z) O 3 OCD W N CD = v 0 0 0 0 N 0 .-. c O = CD �. zv \ CD N c v CD 0 0 c O W cn cn _ 0 cn v v n v N 0 CD CD n v N O 3 CD CD cn M CD cn cn N CTI O O 2 N CD (3D 3 (D c 1 n to r! m < N S, C= < m CY) a) 3 <O� Q- = m M OD 0) w Ln cn � O CA OD v -4 N o C1 V v N CA Cn w O 30— CL 0— CL � O Di v 0 z (D 0 x O 0 O 01 CL O O 20 m0 O 3 C- (D = 0 In Oi CJI Cn a) = N �(D� O to 9 3 < W '(.n' .I CD CD m CL vi 4J -4 CD N U) 0 CJ1 o (a L co v OD v (D 0 C l< 0 3 cp , mm0 02 = m (3D C - - ` 7 0 0 Gt ( C < sm < v CD CD (D 3 N (D Q- = CD 0 N 0) w Ln cn � O CA OD 0 WE (D 0 CD O 0 = m 0 N ai ( � (D 0 • � pt < OC) Q�CD CD _ NS (D O o # = (<D m W O (D (D Q�3 0 N 00 cr, Cn N W � CD t 2CC -0'0-4 O 3=F = N 0 O 0 N ai ( � (D 0 • � pt < OC) Q�CD CD m 3 9 CD 4 N = H o # = cn CA W N i O o c0 � r� N O cn _ O �. z Om m (D �h Z Z \V O r-* D CD 0 CD CD X m D CD 0 CD� =3 // CD t ! Li�I O 3 �.1 v O 0 0 CD 0 CDCD (n CD cn F 3 cn c CD cn � � a a) c nCD (n cn 3 ^^ 11I � i�J � �� . ^ O `J �G Si CD CK CK CD(J � � �nF ^O 0)mD �F CD CD a) CD CD cn