18-100811City of Federal Way
Community Development Dept.
33325 8th Ave S
Federal Way, WA 98003
Ph: (253) 835.2607 Fax (253) 835-2609
q
Building - Commercial
Permit #:18 -100811 -00 -CO
Inspection Request Line: (253) 835-3050
Project Name: WILD WAVES - KIOSKS
Project Address: 36201 ENCHANTED PKWY S Parcel Number: 282104 9026
Project Description: ADD - Construction of a slab for (3) pre -manufactured food kiosks.
Owner
Applicant
Contractor
Lender
CLP ENCHANTED VILLAGE LLC
TODD SUCHANWILD WAVES
ALLEN BRADBURY
OWNER IS LENDER
36201 ENCHANTED PKWY S
THEME PARK
CONSTRUCTION
36201 ENCHANTED PKWY S
901 ALGONA BLVD N SUITE A
FEDERAL WAY WA' 98003-7109
FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
ALGONA WA 98001
Census Category: 437 - Commercial alt / add / conversion
Includes: #1 #2 #3 #4
Occupancy Class:
Construction Type:
Occupancy Load:
Floor Area (sq. ft.) 0.00 F 0.00 0.00
Additional Permit Information
CONDITIONS:
I hood required Separate permit
PERMIT EXPIRES Saturday, 22 September, 2018
Permit Issued on Mondav, March 26, 2018
I hereby certify that the above inform,a ' correct and that the construction on the above described property
and the occupancy and the use i be in ccordance with the laws, rules and regulations of the State of
W ingto and the City of Federal Way.
Owner or agent: ` Date. ���
A
crry of &!�
Federal Way
PERMIT #:
Project:
THIS CARD IS TO REMAIN ON-SITE
Construction Inspection Record
INSPECTION REQUESTS: (253) 835-3050
1810081100 Address: 36201 ENCHANTED PKWY S
CLP ENCHANTED VILLAGE LLC FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
S
Scheduled inspections may be failed if this card is not on-site. DO NOT LOSE THIS CARD. Inspections are listed as close to sequential order as possible
(read left to right, top to bottom). Please schedule inspections as appropriate. Work must not be covered until it is approved. Check with your inspector if
you are unsure about any of the inspections or the inspection sequence. On-going inspections are logged on the back of this card.
®
Initial Erosion Control (4365)
Q
Footings/Setback (4110)
0
Foundation Wall (4115)
Slab/Concrete Floor (4255)
To be done PRIOR to breaking ground
Approved to backfill
Approved to place concrete
1By
Approved to place concrete
By
Date
By
Date . _) Sy
By
Date
®
Drainage/Downspout (4040)
Q
Floor Sheathing (4105)
Re -steel (4215)
®
Slab/Concrete Floor (4255)
Approved to sheath floor
Approved to backfill
Approved to install flooring
1By
Approved to place concrete or grout
By
Approved to place concrete
By
Date
By
By
Date
By
Date
7❑
Underfloor Framing (4285)
Q
Floor Sheathing (4105)
®
Shear Walls (4245)
Approved to sheath floor
Approved to install flooring
1By
Approved to install siding
By
Date
By
Date
By
Date
By
Date
By
Date
t0
Roof Sheathing (4220)
®
Fire/Draft Stops (4095)
0
Interim Erosion Control (4370)
Approved to install roofmg
Approved
Approved
By
Date
By
Date
By
Date
scheduling a Framing inspection;
®
Framing (4120)
®
Insulation (4150)
Plumbing & Mechanical Rough -in
iaspeclioas must be sigaed-pproved
E
A oved to insulate
ArattStop to install wallboard
and approved. IBC 109.3.4
By
Date
By
Date
is
Gypsum Wallboard Nailing (4130)
16
Suspended Ceiling Grid (4265)
0
Final - S K F & R (4060)
Approved to install mud & tape
Approved to drop tile
Approved
By
Date
By
Date
By
Date
1s
Final - Planning
18
Final - Public Works (4080)
Final Electrical
Final Erosion Control (4375)
Approved
Approved
Approved
By
Date
By
Date
By
Date
21 F mal - Building (4050)
Approved
By Date 61r
Rough Electrical
Final Electrical
Right of Way
Approved
Approved
Approved
By
Date
By
Date
By
Date
4ik R, F C fF, I V F D PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF FEB 2 0 2018
PERMIT CENTER + 33325 8th Avenue South + Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
Federal Way C! Ty 011: n E7 r) 7 P A[ - WAV 253-835-2607 + FAX 253-835-2609 + permiteentcr@cityoffederalway.com
COMMUNITY DEVELOPI&W11-
PERMIT NUMBEP,
s TARGET DATE
SITE ADDRESS
SUITE/UNIT #
PROJECT VALUATION
$
ZONING
ASSESSOR'S TAX/PARCEL #
TYPE OF PERMIT
0 BUILDING El PLUMBING El MECHANICAL El DEMOLITION El ENGINEERING 11 FIRE PREVENTION
NAME OF PROJECT
C OR IJ Oo.�S S Lu JH
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
L,
Detailed description of work to
be included on this permit only
oA
NAMEJ
PRIMARY PHONE
PROPERTY OWNER
MAILINGN
E-MAIL
L) (
CIT!—J�
STATE
ZIP
NAME
a6 1Fex1)
PHONE
*1&1)rj1
MAWING ADDRESS
9/ 1�t ea4)A
E -AWL
r! e te cle Ike k,,- � -�Z4 1�,m K
CONTRACTOR
C
ITP647
I—A114
STATE
FAX 4:�eflj -tf-7�-P470�141w- 0
-2---Lj-L-
WA STATE CONTRASMOR'S LICENSE #
RUOU C
EXPIRATION DATE
'7 1
FE6ERAL WAY 13USMESS LICENSE #
2- C) - I �- - 10 1 O -L3
NAME
OAV-0 -4-Lk*1-Q— - G3 A
PRIMARY PHONE
-7 - —6, t I 1�
-S3 , I �-V)
MAILING ADDR S
Nc'j
E-MAIL
APPLICANT-
CI fy--.
STATE I
Z
FAX
PROJECT CONTACT
N4Xr--
r)-V)jn
PRIMARY PHONE
— I,,
(The individual to receive and
to
AWLING ADDREEP
11 C.
E-MAIL
W
respond all correspondence
-3(a2--p
e -
_x.=FAX
WA4 I
T
UA-
ZIP
I
concerning this application)
PROJECT FINANCING
NAME
Er- OWNER -FINANCED
When value is $5,000 or moreMAI,
fRCW 19.27095)
LING RESS CITN,4TATE ZIP
AN[!*
PHONE
2—.53 — L
I certify under penalty of perjury that I am the property owner or authorized agent of the property owner. I certify that to the best
of my knowledge, the information submitted in support of this permit application is true and correct. I certify that I will comply with
all applicable City of Federal Way regulations pertaining to the work authorized by the issuance of a permit. I understand that the
issuance of this permit does not remove the owner's responsibility for compliance with local, state, or federal laws regulating
construction or environmental laws.
I further agree to hold harmless the City of Federal Way as to any claim (including costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees incurred in
the investigation and defense of such claim), which may be made by any person, including the undersigned, and filed against the city,
but only where such claim arises out 01Dreliance of the city, including its officers and employees, upon the accuracy of the
information suppli the city as a pqk of this application.
SIGNATURE:
DATE
PRINT NAME:
Bulletin #100 - January 29, 2016 Page I of 2 k:\Handouts\Permit Application
y
nC
w � �
PR.� PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
04-
0
•
Regulated Building Material Survey
Cafe Rio
1700 South 320th Street
Federal Way, WA 98003
Performed for:
Boyce Construction
270 S Hanford SyO # 109
Seattle, W08134 /'
Accredife"d AHERA Building Inspector
Date Prepared: 12/31/2015
PacRim#: 15641
6510 Southcenter Blvd., Ste. #40
Renttte WA W 1 RR
www.p,tcrimenv.com
Phone: (206) 244-8965
>~— Mn4l )lG_anai
wk J
•
Section1.0 Scope of Work.........................................................................................................3
Section 2.0 Asbestos Survey Narrative...............................................................................4-6
Section 3.0 Abatement Cost Estimate....................................................................................7
Section 4.0 Statement of Compliance......................................................................................8
Section 5.0 Lead -Based Paint Screening Summary
...............................................................9
Section 6.0 Universal Waste Inventory ...................................................................................10
Appendix A: Asbestos Sample Summary
Appendix B: Bulk Sample Analysis Report
Appendix C: Site Sketch
Appendix D: XRF Data Sheets
• Appendix E: XRF Performance Characteristic Sheet
•
Appendix F: Universal Waste Rule WAC 173-303-573
Appendix G: Inspector/Laboratory Certifications
PRE #15641 PAGE 2
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
11
0 0
On December 29h and 30th, 2015, Tyler Sadler, Todd Carter and Ginnie Kindler, AHERA Building Inspectors for Pacific
Rim Environmental, Inc. (PacRim), performed a regulated building material survey at the former Sterling Silver Bank
located at 1700 South 320"h Street in Federal Way, Washington.
Site: The site is occupied by an approximately 4,400 square foot, single -story commercial building. The building was
originally constructed in 1976.
Asbestos -Containing Materials (AC"
1. Bulk sampling and analysis of suspect asbestos -containing materials (ACM).
2. Analysis of suspect ACM by a NVLAP accredited laboratory.
3. Quantity estimates of ACM.
4. Written report including recommendations based on the technician's observations, abatement
(removal) cost estimates, sample descriptions, and sample location.
5. Statement of Compliance with W.A.C. 296-662-07721 Sign -off form.
LeadBased Paints (LBP)
6. Perform screening of suspect lead-based paints.
7. Written report including: Sample descriptions, conditions, locations, analytical results, and
recommendations.
Universal Waste Inventory
8. Inspect and inventory lights and equipment to identify fixture and lamp type to determine presence of
PCB and/or mercury.
The survey was intended to identify possible asbestos -containing materials (ACM) on the interior and exterior of the
building. This inspection covered only those areas, which were exposed andlor physically accessible to the inspector.
Materials uncovered during the course of demolition, renovation, or maintenance activities that are not identified in this
inspection report must be presumed to contain asbestos until PLM analysis proves that this material is not asbestos -
containing.
This survey is not intended for, nor should be used as a design specification. The Asbestos in Schools Hazard
Amendment and Reauthorization Act (ASHARA), effective November 20, 1990, expanded accreditation requirements to
apply to persons who work with asbestos in public and commercial buildings as well as schools. Specifically, ASHARA
expanded the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 206 (a) (1) and (3) to require accreditation for any person
who designs or conducts a response action with respect to friable ACM in a building. TSCA Section 207 provides for
civil penalties of $5,000 for each day of a violation for not employing accredited individuals to design and conduct
response actions. Sampling of suspect asbestos -containing materials was conducted as prescribed in 40 CFR 763.86.
Suspect asbestos -containing materials within the structure were identified and classified as a surfacing material, thermal
system insulation, or miscellaneous materials. Surfacing materials are those, which are either spray applied or troweled -
on for acoustical, decorative, or fireproofing purposes. Thermal system insulation (TSI) is insulation used to inhibit heat
transfer or to prevent condensation on pipes, boilers, tanks, ducts and various other components. Miscellaneous
materials include all other materials not included in the above categories such as floor file, ceiling file, roofing felt,
cementitious materials, wallboard systems and products such as caulking, mastics and putties.
A total of twenty-four (24) samples were collected and submitted for PLM laboratory analysis. Nine (09) of these
samples were found to contain greater than 1 % asbestos. A visual assessment of the property was also performed to
include suspect asbestos -containing materials in areas where destructive sampling could not yet occur. One (01) Visual
assessment was noted, one (1) of these materials is presumed asbestos -containing material (ACM). We recommend
further testing be performed on this material during the destructive phase of this survey.
PRE #15641 PAGE 3
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Padfic Rim Environmental, Inc.
•
•
Bulk samples collected were submitted for sample analysis in accordance with method EPA -000/R-93/116: "Method for
the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk building Materials". Analyses were performed in Pacific Rim Environmental Inc.'s
NVLAP Accredited Laboratory (Lab Code 101631-0). Materials are positive for asbestos if they are found to contain
greater than 1 % or 1 % asbestos.
Thermal Systems Insulation (TSI)
No suspect asbestos -containing TSI was identified during the survey.
If during the course of wall, ceiling or floor demolition, any TSI materials that are not listed in this report are uncovered,
sampling must be performed prior to disturbing these materials.
Surfacing Materials
Suspect asbestos -containing leveling compound was identified in the lobby area, underneath dark ceramic floor tile.
The material was sampled and no asbestos was detected. (Sample# 04)
Suspect asbestos -containing coatings on concrete were identified in the vault room, east wall. The material was
sampled and found to contain 1-3% Chrysotile. (Sample# 11)
Suspect asbestos -containing coatings on concrete were identified in the vault room, north wall. The material was
sampled and found to contain 1-3% Chrysotile. (Sample# 12)
Suspect asbestos -containing texture on GWB with wallpaper was identified in lobby area, north wall. The materials
were sampled and no asbestos was detected. (Sample# 19)
If during the course of wall, ceiling or floor demolition, any surfacing materials not identified in this report are uncovered,
sampling must be performed prior to disturbing these materials.
Miscellaneous Materials
Suspect asbestos -containing dark brown cove base mastic was identified in the vault room. The material was
sampled and no asbestos was detected. (Sample# 01)
Suspect asbestos -containing tan carpet mastic was identified on the vault room floor. The material was sampled and
no asbestos was detected. (Sample# 02)
Suspect asbestos -containing 12x12 orange streaked floor tile and associated mastic was identified on the vault
room floor. The materials were sampled and found to contain 1-3% Chrysotile (Layer 1, Tile) and 5-7% Chrysotile
(Layer 2, Mastic). (Sample# 03)
Suspect asbestos -containing grout between dark ceramic floor file was identified in the center of lobby area. The
material was sampled and no asbestos was detected. (Sample# 05)
PRE #15641 PAGE 4
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
M
E
Miscellaneous continued
Suspect asbestos -containing backer board, leveling compound and associated mastic was identified next to north
exit door, underneath dark ceramic floor tile. The materials were sampled and found to contain 5.7Y* Chrysotile
(Layer 4, Mastic). (Sample# 06)
Suspect asbestos -containing acoustical ceiling tile and associated glue daubs were identified in the north end of
lobby area. The materials were sampled and no asbestos was detected. (Sample# 07)
Suspect asbestos -containing leveling compound and mast underneath backer board was identified next to the north
exit door. The materials were sampled and found to contain 1-3% Chrysotile (Layer 3, Mastic only). (Sample# 08)
Suspect asbestos -containing 12x12 floor the and associated mastic was identified at the north stairwell. The materials
were sampled and found to contain 1-3% Chrysotile (Layer 1, Tile) and 5-7Y6 Chrysotile (Layer 2, Mastic).
(Sample# 09)
Suspect asbestos -containing sheet vinyl flooring and associated mastic was identified on the men's restroom floor.
The material was sampled and no asbestos was detected. (Sample# 10)
Suspect asbestos -containing sheetrock (GWB) was identified above soffit, north wall. The material was sampled and
found to contain 0% Chrysotile. (Sample# 13)
Suspect asbestos -containing sheetrock (GWB) was identified above soffit, east wall. The material was sampled and
found to contain 0% Chrysotile. (Sample# 14)
9 Suspect asbestos -containing sheetrock (GWB) was identified above soffit, south wall. The material was sampled and
found to contain 0% Chiysodle. (Sample# 15)
Suspect asbestos -containing sheetrock (GWB) was identified above soffit, west wall. The material was sampled and
found to contain <1 % Chrysodle. (Sample# 16)
Suspect asbestos -containing mortar around brick was identified in the northeast closet. The material was sampled
and no asbestos was detected. (Sample# 17)
Suspect asbestos -containing sink undercoating was identified in the north end of breakroom. The material was
sampled and no asbestos was detected. (Sample# 18)
Suspect asbestos -containing sheet vinyl flooring was identified on the breakroom floor. The material was sampled and
no asbestos was detected. (Sample# 20)
Suspect asbestos -containing waterproofing felt was identified on the exterior, east wall underneath wood siding. The
material was sampled and no asbestos was detected. (Sample# 21)
Suspect asbestos -containing carpet mastic was identified in the lobby, east end. The material was sampled and no
asbestos was detected. (Sample# 22)
Suspect asbestos -containing 3 tab roofing with associated light colored roofing paper was identified on the
breakroom floor. The materials were sampled and found to contain 65-70% ChWsottle (Layer 3, paper). (Sample#
23)
Suspect asbestos-wntaining 3 tab roofing with associated dark roofing paper was identified on the breakroom floor.
The materials were sampled and no asbestos was detected. (Sample# 24)
PRE #15641 PAGE 5
This report shall not be reproduced, except In full, without written permission from Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
E
•
Suspect asbestos -containing possible mastic underneath teller counter was identified in the lobby area. The material
was visually assessed to be presumed asbestos -containing until further testing can be performed.
(Sample# V - 01)
J1Section 2.0 Asbestos Survey Narrative —Continued
Cafe Rio —1700 S. 320t" St. — Federal way, WA
0
•
If during the course of wall, ceiling or floor demolition, any miscellaneous materials not identified in this report are
uncovered, sampling must be performed prior to disturbing these materials.
PRE #15641 PAGE 6
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
•
•
•
The following abatement costs are "best -effort" estimates and are based on current industry averages. The following
estimates are subject to many variables beyond the control of PRE. Such variables include, but are not limited to:
project duration, contractor work schedule, and hours of work allowed by the owner, contractor performance, and
regulatory agency interpretation of changing regulations, logistics of removal of material and miscellaneous delays. The
estimate is meant only as a guideline to assist in the selection of an abatement contractor and may not reflect the actual
final costs of asbestos removal. They do not include owner costs such as abatement project oversight and monitoring
for compliance to law, and compliance to project plans and/or specifications. These estimates assume that adequate,
professional plans and specifications are prepared. Generally, abatement costs are minimized by professional project
management as well as utilizing the same asbestos abatement contractor to remove all asbestos containing materials
during a single project. It is in no way intended to serve as, or replace, a comprehensive abatement specification.
Estimates include permitting, removal and disposal.
Material (Location)
Approximate
Quantity
Price per Sq. Ft
Ln. Ft or Each
Total
Floor Tile and mastic
Throughout on wood sub -floor
2000 S. F.
@
$3.00
$6,000.00
Wall Coatings in vault room
600 S. F.
@
$10.00
$6,000.00
Roofing Paper Nicolite- Friable
2500 S.F.
@
$4.00
$10,000.00
Universal Waste
L.S.
$500.00
Consultant Oversight & Air Clearance
3 shifts
L.S.
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
PRE #15641
TOTAL F $26,000.00
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission tom Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
PAGE 7
11
•
Ll
In accordance with W.A.C. 296-62-07721 and PSCAA Regulation III, Article 4, Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
performed an asbestos survey of the subject structure located at 1700 S. 320th, Federal Way WA. Should employees
or contract personnel encounter any suspect asbestos -containing materials (ACM) it is their responsibility to:
1. Contact a representative of the owner.
2. Consult the inspection report to determine whether or not the suspect material contains asbestos.
3. If the suspect material does not appear in the inspection report, then that material was not sampled and
must be presumed to contain asbestos until proven otherwise by sampling and PLM analysis.
4. Ensure that all employees and contractors are informed and advised of the location and type of materials
that contain asbestos.
The following asbestos -containing materials were identified at the subject property:
• 12x12 floor tile with associated mastic
• Floor mastic by north exit door
• Coatings walls of vault room
• Associated friable roofing paper (Nicolite)
I Hereby Attest:
The inspection report has been made available to me. I will inform all subcontractors of the location and types of
materials containing asbestos. I am authorized to sign on behalf of my company.
Contractor:
Signature:
Print Name:
Title:
Date:
Owners Rep:
Signature:
Print Name:
Title:
Date:
PRE #15641 PAGE 8
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
0
•
11
0 0
PRE #15641
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
PAGE 11
1 0
0
\
y
§
�
<
z
z
y
>
)G
tr
2a
�
\§
@0
�
\/
\
�
a)°
/
11
X
�
L
z
�r
_
)
m
\
:
\
0
7
®
{
§
2
\
(
_
$t
§'0
/
�
\
q
/
)
\
�
s
)
\
))
)
E
]
z-
//
]
§
§
E
zz
§
§
�
�
O
°
N
§
R
2
/
[\
E
@
z
z
z
LO
±
�
§
/
�
/
7
E
\
f
LL
f
§t
c
;
§
_
;
k cu
E
E
\
—
\
22
0
\
\�
2
=
E
4
j
)
\ \
\
)
(
)
. .
f
u
o
a
\
\
\
j
�
k
/
k
/
Z
Z
\
�
`
`
\
a
ƒ
�
0
0
\
y
§
\
<
z
z
y
>
)G
tr
2a
§
\§
@0
\/
\
\
a)°
/
11
X
�
[�
z
�r
_
)
m
\
/\
\
0
k(
®
{
§
0*°
\
Q
_
$t
§'0
/\
®2
\
0\
/
)
\
)
s
)
\
))
)
)
]
7
//
]
§
§
§
§
§
§
°
N
§
R
2
/
[\
E
@
z
z
z
LO
±
2
�
o
E
2
f
§t
c
;
_
;
k cu
E
E
(
§
\
22
0
2
=
E
4
j
)
\ \
\
)
(
)
f
\
\
\
j
k
k
k
0
@
\
/
ƒ/
)G
2a
§
\§
@0
\/
\
a)°
/
11
X
(
[�
z
�r
_
)
m
\
/\
\
0
{
®
{
§
0*°
\
Q
_
$t
§'0
)
®2
\
0\
/
)
\
)
s
)
\
))
)
)
r
r
\
\
§
§
§
§
@
cE
$
§
\§
a)°
/
11
X
/
§
_
&
\
/\
\
�)
®
CU
b
0*°
§'0
co
\
\
j
)
\
)
§ 2
LO
<
r
r
r
r
§
§
§
§
§
§
/
N
§
§
2
§
G
@
co
G
3
LO
±
@
•
0 0
U Cl) lL u"
6 C6
Z p N Z O N O
N L OM
N
Z
d
T
t
N
V
_
Nt
T
J
ti
q
Au ''
Con
M
4
to
N
V
O tir)
T
co
L
a)
W
L
a)
LL
O
m
N
L F
O
m
L
o
MZJ~
�
.V
ZJ
C N
V N
O
O
_41
1
o
a)
O_
C
w
Cj
tJ
ZL
C
Q7
r
d
v
tj
Q
Ci
N U
L)
d
d
N
W
�n
t
U
M
d n
U
'C
V)
Z0
T (V
T N
0 0
U Cl) lL u"
6 C6
Z p N Z O N O
N L OM
N
M
d
T
N
J
T
J
M
to
N
aO r
O tir)
L
0 4I
N y
L
O
m
N
L F
O
m
C N
V N
o
o
a)
ZL
al L
Q7
r
r
O
�
N U
L)
d
d
N
W
°a
t
U
ani N
d n
V)
Z0
T (V
T N
O
J
Z
U
U
v
U
a)
U
N
U
L
E
a7
OL
N
N
U
O
C
_
O
N
E
G
'00
U
0
in
�a
O
N
mC
O
N
to
C
ca
a)
(v
.O
_O
_
'O
0)
N
O
n
N
O
C
C
CL
U
E
a)
0
O
U
O
U
O
U
. a
O
U
00
T
C
C
O
C
O
Y
U
0
U 7
O
N
m
>
U
0)
C
0)
C
O`
0
N 12
N
_
(6
0 a)
> N
X
a) N
(0
Q)
Qrn
�-0 cLnE
U
U
ti
N
N
N
N
7
N
C
7
0
7
N
0)
C
N
a1
c6
N
a)
m
t6
U
U
U)
U)
N
—
m
0
O
m
3
3
3
L
L
—2
0
cu
0
12E
75
aa)
c
.0
C
'c
E
.X
O
O
0
N
a)
(D
n
0
0
7
7
>
O
Z
Z
Z
Sc
>
>
Q
Ln
LO
LO
LO
n
U')
Ln
O
O
N
O
O
N
N
m
N
6)
N
O
N
m
N
0)
N
O
N
O
N
a
C1400
r
O
O
O
T-
�2
•
• 0
M M M
O Z Z Z z
N (n In
N
N
N
N
T
ro
T
ro
rry�
�1
Q
O
Wei
b
..U.,
U
N
v
N
U
N
U
V
J
=
L
r
1
a
O
0
U
U
U
0
0
o
c
rrr
c
c
V
V
V
Z
Z
Z
Z
(D
m
a�
V
E
E
E
a
ro
ro
ro
m
N
N
m
3
N
N
N
L
O
L
o
O
U
c
M
a
a
�
o
O
O
.J
O
C
IIMIMMIM
Q
'Q-.
0
U
cei
ro
U
tj
Y
Y
Y
OO
�
C
T
q
�
v
C
O
O
O
C
C
N
>
,
N
N
cli
O
(D
Y
L
L
L
O
C
N
L
V
U)
N
N
.0
V
N
N
0.
>
• 0
M M M
O Z Z Z z
N (n In
i
N
N
N
N
T
ro
T
ro
Q
Q
O
0
O
O ++
..U.,
U
N
v
N
U
N
U
=
L
r
D
a
O
0
U
U
U
0
0
o
c
c
c
c
V
V
V
Z
Z
Z
Z
(D
m
a�
E
E
E
a
ro
ro
ro
m
N
N
N
3
N
N
N
L
O
O
O
U
c
�
a
a
m
Q
0
U
U
Y
Y
Y
OO
�
C
T
O
C
O
O
O
ro
C
N
>
N
N
N
cli
O
(D
Y
L
L
L
O
C
N
L
c
U)
N
N
N
N
N
N
>
>
7
7
:3
7
C
N
C
N
C
N
N
N
N
ro
ca
ro
ro
ro
ro
ro
`t
L
Mn
M
—
E
3
3c
3
Yca
3
N
7
N
N
C
of
N
°c
o
0
3
0
U
O
O
N
N
U)
cN0
ro
O
N
N
N
T
Y
O
O
L
pro)
O
Q
Q
Q
z
z
-1
m
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
LO
cn
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
i
L
0 •
LL
h
r
N
Z
Z
h
N
u
O
(n
O
V
M
T
W
76
a)
m
..
L
N
.`.
O
O
y4
J
C
i rrAr
O
�
Z
m
U
v.
Q
mV
CLi.•
ti
�
�
a)
U
'v
Q.
o
0 •
i
LL
M
Z
Z
O
N
O
(n
O
M
m
cv
J
'O
a)
U
o
aO�
Q o
O
h
Q) to
],
N
O
�
L
Z -
O
N O
m
T L
V
m
Ja
Z
Z
Z
m
m
c
c
0
o
a)
0
0
N
L_
UO
C
OU
N
m
N
m
c
L
L
O
Q)
3
3
c
o
m
w
0)
w
m
E
0
cNo
m
EL
�m
°m
00
n. U
U
co a
M O.
U
d1
to
N
N
>
>
7
7
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
C
t4
c
N
C
(6
C
N
C
t0
O
m
'O
c6
c6
N
_ U
N
a)
3 0
=
N
O
O
m
a)
ro
c
N
O C
O
O
T
W=
J
W
W 2
J
)n
LO
Ln
LO
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
m
m
O
O
O
N
N
M
M
N
(14
.N-
04
.Nco —
.N-
N
N
N
N
;
i
•
•
•
PRE #15641
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Pack Rim Environmental, Inc.
PAGE 12
P11 PACIFIC Rim ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
E
BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT
CLIENT: Boyce Construction
PACRIM # :
15641
628 South Brandon Street
REPORT # :
2015-12-0278
Seattle, WA 98108
DATE RECEIVED :
12/29/2015
ANALYST:
William F. G011oway
PROJECT: Cafe Rio
DATE ANALYZED :
12/29 Et 12/30/2015
1700 South 320th Street
REPORT BY :
Olivia Neira
Federal Way, WA
REPORT DATE :
12/30/2015
TURNAROUND:
Rush
SAMPLE DATE: 12/29 Et 12/30/2015
PAGE:
1 of 7
Attached are the results of analysis of 24 bulk samples submitted for asbestos identification: Lab ID #2015-12-
0278 through 2015-12-0299 and 2015-12-0314 through 2015-12-0315.
The samples were analyzed in accordance with method EPA -600/R-93/116: "Method for the Determination of
Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials".
Unless otherwise noted, the samples were inhomogeneous; subsamples of components were analyzed to
achieve representative analysis. Separate layers of layered samples are analyzed and reported separately.
•Unless otherwise stated, asbestos content was quantified by calibrated visual estimation (CVES). CVES
concentrations are reported in 2 to 3 percent ranges for fiber concentrations ranging from 1-10%, and 5 percent
ranges for concentrations greater than 10%. Samples in which asbestos was not observed are reported as "none
detected".
•
Limitations and Uncertainty:
Factors such as sample quality, sample size, interfering matrix material, fiber size, and fiber concentration
contribute to the uncertainty of asbestos concentration measurements in bulk materials. Relative errors
exceeding 100% may occur in samples containing <1-10% asbestos. Relative errors are typically below 30% in
samples with greater than 10% asbestos, and approach zero as the asbestos concentration approaches 100°/x.
Asbestos fibers with diameters below approximately 0.25 micrometers are not detectable by PLM. These
extremely fine fibers may occur in such products as floor tile, adhesives, and cement products. This limitation can
be overcome, however, by the use of alternate analytical methods, such as Transmission Electron Microscopy
(TEM).
This report cannot be represented by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the
U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full without written permission from the
laboratory.
NVLAP Accredited LAB #: 101631-0
Samples submitted by: PacRim
6510 Southcenter Blvd., Ste. #40
Ci--ut_ %%?A no 100
Reports
Reviewed By:
www.pacrunenv.cor, i
Phone: (206) 244-8965
11 /nn/1 n /. /. nnnf
•
•
0
Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT
CLIENT: Boyce Construction
PACRIM # :
15641
628 South Brandon Street
REPORT # :
2015-12-0278
Seattle, WA 98108
DATE RECEIVED:
12/29/2015
12-29-15
ANALYST:
William F. Goltoway
PROJECT: CafL& Rio
DATE ANALYZED:
12/29 Et 12/30/2015
1700 South 320th Street
REPORT BY:
Olivia Neira
Federal Way, WA
REPORT DATE:
12/30/2015
Brown mastic with adhering
TURNAROUND:
Rush
SAMPLE DATE: 12/29 Et 12/30/2015
PAGE:
2 Of 7
Cllent/Lab ID
Number
Sample
Location and Description
Asbestos Type(s) / %
Other Material(s)
Date
Analyzed
1
Vault room (Dark brown cove
None Detected.
Cellulose (1-3%),
12-29-15
base and mastic).
Synthetics (<1%), Adhesive,
2015-12-0278
Mineral Aggregate.
Brown mastic with adhering
paper fragment.
2
Vault room, floor (Tan carpet
None Detected.
Cellulose (<1%),
12-29-15
mastic).
Synthetics (<l%), Adhesive,
2015-12-0279
Mineral Aggregate.
Light yellow brown mastic.
3
Vault room, floor (12x12 inch
Layer 1 (Tile):
Layer 1: Mineral Aggregate,
12-29-15
orange -streaked floor tile
Chrysotile 1-3%
Binder.
2015-12-0280
with associated black mastic).
Layer 2 (Mastic):
Layer 2: Cellulose (<1%), Tar,
Orange, brown and white floor
Chrysotile 5-7%
Mineral Aggregate.
tile (layer 1) with black tar
mastic (layer 2).
4
Lobby area, underneath dark
None Detected.
Cellulose (1-3%), Mineral
12-29-15
ceramic tile (Leveling
Aggregate, Binder.
2015-12-0281
compound).
Light gray leveling compound
with adhering fibers.
5
Center of lobby area (Grout
None Detected.
Cellulose (<1%), Mineral
12-29-15
between dark ceramic floor
Aggregate, Binder.
2015-12-0282
tiles).
Gray, brittle grout -like
material.
3
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
•
•
Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT
CLIENT: Boyce Construction
PACRIM # :
15641
628 South Brandon Street
REPORT # :
2015-12-0278
Seattle, WA 98108
DATE RECEIVED:
12/29/2015
12-29-15
ANALYST:
William F. Golloway
PROJECT: Cafe Rio
DATE ANALYZED :
12/29 Et 12/30/2015
1700 South 320th Street
REPORT BY:
Olivia Neira
Federal Way, WA
REPORT DATE :
12/30/2015
mastic, underneath dark
TURNAROUND:
Rush
SAMPLE DATE: 12/29 it 12/30/2015
PAGE:
3 of 7
Client/Lab ID
Number
Sample
Location and Description
Asbestos Type(s) / %
Other Material(s)
Date
Analyzed
6
Next to north exit door
Layer 1 (Fiber board):
Layer 1: Cellulose (30-35%),
12-29-15
(Backer board with leveling
None Detected.
Mineral Aggregate, Binder.
2015-12-0283
compound and associated
mastic, underneath dark
Layer 2
Layer 2: Cellulose (<1%),
ceramic floor tile).
(Leveling compound):
Mineral Aggregate, Binder.
None Detected.
Light gray, cement board
Layer 3: Cellulose (<1%),
material (layer 1) on light gray
Layer 3 (Mastic):
Adhesive, Mineral Aggregate.
leveling compound (layer 2) on
None Detected.
light yellow mastic (layer 3) on
Layer 4: Cellulose (<1%), Tar,
black tar mastic (layer 4).
Layer 4 (Mastic):
Mineral Aggregate.
Chrysotile 5-7%
7
North end of lobby area
Layer 1 (Ceiling tile):
Layer 1: Cellulose (20-25%),
12-29-15
(Acoustical ceiling the
None Detected.
Fibrous Glass (50-55%), Binder,
2015-12-0284
attached to surfaces with
Paint.
associated mastic).
Layer 2 (Mastic):
None Detected.
Layer 2: Cellulose (<1%),
White -painted, light gray,
Fibrous Glass (3-5%), Adhesive,
fibrous ceiling tile (layer 1)
Mineral Aggregate.
with light yellow-brown mastic
(layer 2).
8
North exit door (Leveling
Layer 1
Layer 1: Cellulose (20-25%),
12-29-15
compound underneath backer
(Cement board):
Binder, Mineral Aggregate.
2015-12-0285
board).
None Detected.
Layer 2: Cellulose (<l%),
Light gray -white cement board
Layer 2
Mineral Aggregate, Binder.
material (layer 1) with gray
(Leveling compound):
leveling compound (layer 2)
None Detected.
Layer 3: Cellulose (<1%),
and yellow and black mastics
Adhesive, Tar, Mineral
(layer 3).
Layer 3 (Mastic):
Aggregate.
Chrysotile 1-3%
Note: Mastics were
inseparable.
3
This report shall not be reproduced, except in fiill, without written permission from Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
( 4 0 9
0
11
13
Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT
CLIENT: Boyce Construction
PACRIM # :
15641
628 South Brandon Street
REPORT # :
2015-12-0278
Seattle, WA 98108
DATE RECEIVED:
12/29/2015
ANALYST:
William F. Galloway
PROJECT: CafL6- Rio
DATE ANALYZED:
12/29 a 12/30/2015
1700 South 32011 Street
REPORT BY:
Olivia Neira
Federal Way, WA
REPORT DATE :
12/30/2015
TURNAROUND:
Rush
SAMPLE DATE: 12/29 8t 12/30/2015
PAGE:
4 of 7
Client/Lab ID
Number
Sample
Location and Description
Asbestos Type(s) / %
Other Materials)
Date
Analyze
9
North stairwell (1 2XI 2 inch
Layer I (Tile):
Layer 1: Mineral Aggregate,
12-29-15
floor tile with mastic).
Chrysotile 1-31%
Binder.
2015-12-0286
Orange, brown and white floor
Layer 2 (Mastic):
Layer 2: Cellulose (<l%), Tar,
tile (layer 1) with black, tar
Chrysotile 5-7%
Mineral Aggregate.
mastic (layer 2).
10
Men's restroom, floor (Sheet
Layer 1
Layer 1: Fiberglass (3-5%),
12-29-15
vinyl flooring with associated
(Vinyl with backing):
Vinyl, Mineral Aggregate,
2015-12-0287
mastic).
None Detected.
Binder.
Light yellow, gray, and light
Layer 2 (Mastic):
Layer 2: Cellulose (<I%),
brown sheet vinyl with white
None Detected.
Adhesive, Mineral Aggregate,
foam backing (layer 1) and
light yellow, tacky mastic
(layer 2).
Note: Leveling compound
present, but insufficient to
test.
11
Vault room, east wall
Chrysotile 1-31%
Cellulose (<I%), Mineral
12-29-15
(Coatings on concrete).
Aggregate, Binder, Paint.
2015-12-0288
White -painted, tight gray
texture -like material.
12
Vault room, north wall
Chrysotile 1-3%
Cellulose (0%), Mineral
12-29-15
(Coatings on concrete).
Aggregate, Binder, Paint.
2015-12-0289
White -painted, light gray
texture -like material with
concrete fragments.
13
Above soffit, north wall
Layer I (Mud):
Layer 1: Cellulose (<I%), 12-29-15
(Sheetrock, composite
Chrysotile 1-31%
Binder, Mineral Aggregate,
2015-12-0290
sample).
Paint.
Layer 2 (Drywall):
Pate yellow -painted, white,
None Detected.
Layer 2: Cellulose (7-10%6),
chalky mud (layer 1) on light
Fiberglass (1-3%), Gypsum,
pink, chalky drywall with
Total asbestos: 0%
Mineral Aggregate, Binder.
brown paper (layer 2).
.... ......... .., I ......pt .. I W t IVUL witucti permission ITUM raCITIC KIM bnVironmental, Inc,
0 # ! 0
•
•
Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT
CLIENT: Boyce Construction
PACRIM # :
15641
628 South Brandon Street
REPORT # :
2015-12-0278
Seattle, WA 98108
DATE RECEIVED:
12/29/2015
12-29-15
ANALYST:
William F. Golloway
PROJECT: Cafe Rio
DATE ANALYZED:
12/29 £t 12/30/2015
1700 South 320th Street
REPORT BY:
Olivia Neira
Federal Way, WA
REPORT DATE:
12/30/2015
Pale yellow -painted, white,
TURNAROUND:
Rush
SAMPLE DATE: 12/29 It 12/30/2015
PAGE:
5 of 7
Client/Lab ID
Number
Sample
Location and Description
Asbestos Type(s) / %
Other Material(s)
Date
Analyzed
14
Above soffit, east wall
Layer 1
Layer 1: Cellulose (25-30%),
12-29-15
(Sheetrock, composite
(Mud with paper):
Binder, Mineral Aggregate,
2015-12-0291
sample).
Chrysotile 1-3%
Paint.
Pale yellow -painted, white,
Layer 2 (Drywall):
Layer 2: Cellulose (3-5%),
chalky mud with white paper
None Detected.
Fiberglass (1-3%), Gypsum,
(layer 1) on light pink, chalky
Mineral Aggregate, Binder.
drywall with brown paper
Total asbestos: <1%
(layer 2).
15
Above soffit, south wall
Layer 1
Layer 1: Cellulose (25-30%),
12-30-15
(Sheetrock, composite
(Mud with paper):
Binder, Mineral Aggregate,
2015-12-0292
sample).
Chrysotile 1-3%
Paint.
Pale yellow -painted, white,
Layer 2 (Drywall):
Layer 2: Cellulose (5-7%),
chalky mud with white paper
None Detected.
Fiberglass (1-3%), Gypsum,
(layer 1) on light pink, chalky
Mineral Aggregate, Binder.
drywall with brown paper
Total asbestos: 0%
(layer 2).
16
Above soffit, west wall
Layer 1
Layer 1: Cellulose (25-30%),
12-30-15
(Sheetrock, composite
(Mud with paper):
Binder, Mineral Aggregate,
2015-12-0293
sample).
Chrysotile 1-3%
Paint.
Pate yellow -painted, white,
Layer 2 (Drywall):
Layer 2: Cellulose (3-5%),
chalky mud with white paper
None Detected.
Fiberglass (1-3%), Gypsum,
(layer 1) on light pink, chalky
Mineral Aggregate, Binder.
drywall with brown paper
Total asbestos: 0%
(layer 2).
17
Northeast closet (Mortar
None Detected.
Cellulose (<l%), Mineral
12-30-15
around brick).
Aggregate, Binder.
2015-12-0294
Light gray mortar -like
material.
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
a
0
•
0
Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT
CLIENT: Boyce Construction
PACRIM # :
15641
628 South Brandon Street
REPORT # :
2015-12-0278
Seattle, WA 98108
DATE RECEIVED:
12/29/2015
12-30-15
ANALYST:
William F. GOltoway
PROJECT: Cafe Rio
DATE ANALYZED:
12/29 £t 12/30/2015
1700 South 320th Street
REPORT BY:
Olivia Neira
Federal Way, WA
REPORT DATE:
12/30/2015
White, crumbled sink under-
TURNAROUND:
Rush
SAMPLE DATE: 12/29 a 12/30/2015
PAGE:
6 of 7
Client/Lab ID
Number
Sample
Location and Description
Asbestos Type(s) / %
Other Material(s)
Date
Analyzed
18
North end of breakroom (Sink
None Detected.
Cellulose (20-25%), Binder,
12-30-15
undercoating).
Mineral Aggregate.
2015-12-0295
White, crumbled sink under-
coating material.
Note: Sample appears to be
homogeneous.
19
Lobby area, north wall
Layer 1
Layer 1: Binder, Mineral
12-30-15
(Texture on GWB with
(Flexible material):
Aggregate, Paint.
2015-12-0296
wallpaper).
None Detected.
Layer 2: Cellulose (55-60%),
White -painted, brown, flexible
Layer 2 (Paper):
Synthetics (15-20%).
material (layer 1) with white
None Detected.
paper (layer 2) and white-
Layer 3: Synthetics (80-85%),
painted, red woven material
Layer 3
Binder.
(layer 3) with white, chalky
(Red woven material):
material (layer 4).
None Detected.
Layer 4: Cellulose (<1%),
Binder, Mineral Aggregate.
Layer 4
(Chalky material):
None Detected.
20
Breakroom floor (Sheet vinyl
Layer 1 (Vinyl):
Layer 1: Vinyl, Mineral
12-30-15
flooring).
None Detected.
Aggregate.
2015-12-0297
Light brown and gray sheet
Layer 2 (Backing):
Layer 2: Fiberglass (3-5%),
vinyl (layer 1) with tight gray
None Detected.
Binder, Mineral Aggregate.
backing (layer 2) and light
yellow mastic (layer 3).
Layer 3 (Mastic):
Layer 3: Cellulose (<1%),
None Detected.
Adhesive, Mineral Aggregate,
Wood.
21
Exterior, east wall
None Detected.
Cellulose (60-65%), Tar,
12-30-15
underneath wood siding
Mineral Aggregate.
2015-12-0298
(Waterproofing felt).
Black tar paper material.
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
0
•
n
U
Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT
CLIENT: Boyce Construction
PACRIM # :
15641
628 South Brandon Street
REPORT # :
2015-12-0278
Seattle, WA 98108
DATE RECEIVED:
12/29/2015
12-30-15
ANALYST:
William F. G011oway
PROJECT: Cafe Rio
DATE ANALYZED :
12/29 Et 12/30/2015
1700 South 320th Street
REPORT BY:
Olivia Neira
Federal Way, WA
REPORT DATE :
12/30/2015
Yellow-brown mastic with
TURNAROUND:
Rush
SAMPLE DATE: 12/29 Et 12/30/2015
PAGE:
7 of 7
Client/Lab ID
Number
Sample
Location and Description
Asbestos Type(s) / %
Other Material(s)
Date
Analyzed
22
Lobby, east end (Carpet
None Detected.
Cellulose (<1%),
12-30-15
mastic).
Synthetics (<1%), Adhesive,
2015-12-0299
Mineral Aggregate.
Yellow-brown mastic with
adhering fibers.
23
Exterior, northeast area (3
Layer 1 (Roofing):
Layer 1: Cellulose (<1%),
12-30-15
tab roofing with roofing
None Detected.
Fiberglass (3-5%), Mineral
2015-12-0314
papers).
Aggregate, Tar.
Layer 2 (Tar paper):
Black tar roofing with gray and
None Detected.
Layer 2: Cellulose (60-65%),
white gravel (layer 1), black
Tar.
tar paper (layer 2) and gray
Layer 3 (Gray paper):
paper (layer 3).
Chrysotile 65-70%
Layer 3: Cellulose (<1%),
Fiberglass (<1%), Binder,
Mineral Aggregate, Tar.
24
Exterior, southwest area of
Layer 1 (Roofing):
Layer 1: Cellulose (<1%),
12-30-15
roof (3 tab roofing with
None Detected.
Fiberglass (3-5%), Mineral
2015-12-0315
roofing paper underneath).
Aggregate, Tar.
Layer 2 (Tar paper):
Black tar roofing with orange
None Detected.
Layer 2: Cellulose (60-65%),
and brown gravel (layer 1) and
Tar.
black tar paper (layer 2).
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
•
•
•
! 0
PRE #15641
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Pack Rim Environmental, Inc.
PAGE 13
Ah
A&
Site Sketch
Samples positive for asbestos appear in squares EX:
Ir
01 09
02 06
f-20 03
/
f 12 08 11 j13 /Drop box 17om
18
23
Women's 21
restroom
10
Men's 07
Vault /Safe restroom 22
Room 19
16--
�`,
_.-----`��04
05
14
n
0
�o
24
15
N
Project # : 15641
Boyce Construction
Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
Drawing # : 01 of 01
6510 Southcenter Boulevard, #40
Sampling Date:
Cafe Rio
Seattle, WA 98188 12/29 ft 12/30/15
1700 S. 320th Street
Drawing by : Olivia Neira
Federal Way, WA
Tel. (206) 244-8965 FAX (206) 244-9096
Drawing Not to Scale
•
0
CJ
0 0
PRE #15641
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Pack Rim Environmental, Inc.
PAGE 14
• N
�D n
N
00 O t
C u La
� U
ao v
J C% O Ln
X N !—
N
u E
A �
n- E
E
0
0
l)
2
fu
It:
E
N
4
i
C�
O O O O O V M O O O O O
<- o 0 0 o O o 0 0 o o o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 '-
QJ 4J v v 4! v N N 4J Q, QJ N QJ QJ N Q, N tL v Q,
N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O On O O O O�^ z
0 o w 0 0 w v 0 a 0 0 0 w 0 0 a 0 0 0 v o 0
n-cl-zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzza CL
0 0 o v o 0 0 0" o v v v v° v v
> > > �- > > > > on ? n n n on
on . - .
L Lon on on
0 o c v c on on on c c
o O O .0 O O 'n .a
ro 0 0 0 C o 1- 0 4- v- v- p 0 0
T T T Y Y Y L .ti, N �,, 0 0 O .+,, .�.,
-0-0 0 v v 0 On 0) o -0 -0 m� R o 0
J J -i m co CO Z ::E LL 7n Ln co V7 cc LL LL-
01)
L
on on on on M
L c c E c c ,.., u
0 .O .--o •C .D .O o O
C 'n -� � N ,-+ N VI d to 4-
0 Q u u b r° 0 0 ° u .`o 0 0 `o `o `o `o `o
n ro ro i>>o 0 0, is a' io +� °� a +' °� +' a
- W
> > 0 0 C 3 tro 3 W w W w W W W
L N N a) N UU,
-C -C -C -C L
J U U U U U
C G C G C
B O O O O O
7 D d 0 0 0
4 QJ ;0 4
io io ics io io ro v v u
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o 0 0 v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a o
iili 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0�: 3: 33: 3 u 33:
N M u-1 �O r� O 0, O N M "T Ln 10 t� CO (7, Ln lr1 Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln 10 10 10 10 10 �o 10 10 10
N M V• Ln 'O I- 00 O- O— e- �-- r- - — - -- rl W — O N M �
N N N N N
Q
i
Qj
Lnz
0
> o
o�
M~
i 03i
coi >
cr Q ck�
co 0
Cc c
0
O c
Q E
c
0
— c
W
Y E
~ U
o
a
- •N
N_
E
m N
L n
c
0
C:
a7 3
U
� o
o w
U 3
O =
L C
CL
U
G X
ca )
J
do
E
E
1a)
c C
Lu -
LN
N
C
U O
4= N
U N
aF
W
V/
m
t+
�J
J -J
QJ
LL
O
41
ul
,
Uv
/
O
0
to
v
0
x
L
N
0
r
=
V
)
O O
•�
7
O
U
N
4J
N O
Q.
T
00
ns
o 0
Co
'D
�
u
cu
m
'a
cu
N
u E
A �
n- E
E
0
0
l)
2
fu
It:
E
N
4
i
C�
O O O O O V M O O O O O
<- o 0 0 o O o 0 0 o o o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 '-
QJ 4J v v 4! v N N 4J Q, QJ N QJ QJ N Q, N tL v Q,
N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O On O O O O�^ z
0 o w 0 0 w v 0 a 0 0 0 w 0 0 a 0 0 0 v o 0
n-cl-zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzza CL
0 0 o v o 0 0 0" o v v v v° v v
> > > �- > > > > on ? n n n on
on . - .
L Lon on on
0 o c v c on on on c c
o O O .0 O O 'n .a
ro 0 0 0 C o 1- 0 4- v- v- p 0 0
T T T Y Y Y L .ti, N �,, 0 0 O .+,, .�.,
-0-0 0 v v 0 On 0) o -0 -0 m� R o 0
J J -i m co CO Z ::E LL 7n Ln co V7 cc LL LL-
01)
L
on on on on M
L c c E c c ,.., u
0 .O .--o •C .D .O o O
C 'n -� � N ,-+ N VI d to 4-
0 Q u u b r° 0 0 ° u .`o 0 0 `o `o `o `o `o
n ro ro i>>o 0 0, is a' io +� °� a +' °� +' a
- W
> > 0 0 C 3 tro 3 W w W w W W W
L N N a) N UU,
-C -C -C -C L
J U U U U U
C G C G C
B O O O O O
7 D d 0 0 0
4 QJ ;0 4
io io ics io io ro v v u
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o 0 0 v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a o
iili 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0�: 3: 33: 3 u 33:
N M u-1 �O r� O 0, O N M "T Ln 10 t� CO (7, Ln lr1 Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln 10 10 10 10 10 �o 10 10 10
N M V• Ln 'O I- 00 O- O— e- �-- r- - — - -- rl W — O N M �
N N N N N
Q
i
Qj
Lnz
0
> o
o�
M~
i 03i
coi >
cr Q ck�
co 0
Cc c
0
O c
Q E
c
0
— c
W
Y E
~ U
o
a
- •N
N_
E
m N
L n
c
0
C:
a7 3
U
� o
o w
U 3
O =
L C
CL
U
G X
ca )
J
do
E
E
1a)
c C
Lu -
LN
N
C
U O
4= N
U N
aF
Ll
E
1 0 0
PRE #15641 PAGE 15
This report shall not be reproduced, except In full, without written permission from Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
•
C�
Niton XLp 300, 9/24/2004, ed. 1
Performance Characteristic Sheet
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 24, 2004 EDITION NO.:1
MANUFACTURER AND MODEL:
Make: Niton LLC
Tested Model: XLp 300
Source: 108Cd
Note: This PCS is also applicable to the equivalent model variations indicated
below, for the Lead -in -Paint K+L variable reading time mode, in the XLi and
XLp series:
XLi 300A, XLi 301A, XLi 302A and XLi 303A.
XLp 300A, XLp 301 A, XLp 302A and XLp 303A.
XLi 700A, XLi 701 A, XLi 702A and XLi 703A.
XLp 700A, XLp 701 A, XLp 702A, and XLp 703A.
Note: The XLi and XLp versions refer to the shape of the handle part of the instrument. The
differences in the model numbers reflect other modes available, in addition to Lead -in -
Paint modes. The manufacturer states that specifications for these instruments are
identical for the source, detector, and detector electronics relative to the Lead -in -Paint
mode.
FIELD OPERATION GUIDANCE
OPERATING PARAMETERS:
Lead -in -Paint K+L variable reading time mode.
XRF CALIBRATION CHECK LIMITS:
The calibration of the XRF instrument should be checked using the paint film nearest 1.0 mg/cm2 in the NIST
Standard Reference Material (SRM) used (e.g., for NIST SRM 2579, use the 1.02 mg/cm2 film).
If readings are outside the acceptable calibration check range, follow the manufacturer's instructions to bring
the instruments into control before XRF testing proceeds.
SUBSTRATE CORRECTION:
For XRF results using Lead -in -Paint K+L variable reading time mode, substrate correction is not needed for:
Brick, Concrete, Drywall, Metal, Plaster, and Wood
INCONCLUSIVE RANGE OR THRESHOLD:
K+L MODE
READING DESCRIPTION
SUBSTRATE
THRESHOLD
(mg/cm)
Results not corrected for substrate bias on any
Brick
1.0
substrate
Concrete
1.0
Drywall
1.0
Metal
1.0
Plaster
1.0
Wood
1.0
1 of 3
•
0
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
EVALUATION DATA SOURCE AND DATE:
•
Niton XLp 300, 9/24/2004, ed. 9
This sheet is supplemental information to be used in conjunction with Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for
the Evaluation and Control of Lead -Based Paint Hazards in Housing ("HUD Guidelines"). Performance
parameters shown on this sheet are calculated from the EPA/HUD evaluation using archived building
components. Testing was conducted in August 2004 on 133 testing combinations. The instruments that
were used to perform the testing had new sources; one instrument's was installed in November 2003 with
40 mCi initial strength, and the other's was installed June 2004 with 40 mCi initial strength.
OPERATING PARAMETERS:
Performance parameters shown in this sheet are applicable only when properly operating the instrument
using the manufacturer's instructions and procedures described in Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines.
SUBSTRATE CORRECTION VALUE COMPUTATION:
Substrate correction is not needed for brick, concrete, drywall, metal, plaster or wood when using Lead -in -
Paint K+L variable reading time mode, the normal operating mode for these instruments. If substrate
correction is desired, refer to Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for guidance on correcting XRF results for
substrate bias.
EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF XRF TESTING:
Randomly select ten testing combinations for retesting from each house or from two randomly selected
units in multifamily housing. Use the K+L variable time mode readings.
Conduct XRF retesting at the ten testing combinations selected for retesting.
Determine if the XRF testing in the units or house passed or failed the test by applying the steps below.
Compute the Retest Tolerance Limit by the following steps:
Determine XRF results for the original and retest XRF readings. Do not correct the
original or retest results for substrate bias. In single-family housing a result is defined as
the average of three readings. In multifamily housing, a result is a single reading.
Therefore, there will be ten original and ten retest XRF results for each house or for the
two selected units.
Calculate the average of the original XRF result and retest XRF result for each
testing combination.
Square the average for each testing combination.
Add the ten squared averages together. Call this quantity C.
Multiply the number C by 0.0072. Call this quantity D.
Add the number 0.032 to D. Call this quantity E.
Take the square root of E. Call this quantity F.
Multiply F by 1.645. The result is the Retest Tolerance Limit.
Compute the average of all ten original XRF results.
Compute the average of all ten re -test XRF results.
• Find the absolute difference of the two averages.
2 of 3
• 0
Niton XLp 300, 9/24/2004, ed. 1
If the difference is less than the Retest Tolerance Limit, the inspection has passed the retest. If
• the difference of the overall averages equals or exceeds the Retest Tolerance Limit, this
procedure should be repeated with ten new testing combinations. If the difference of the overall
averages is equal to or greater than the Retest Tolerance Limit a second time, then the
inspection should be considered deficient.
Use of this procedure is estimated to produce a spurious result approximately 1% of the time. That is,
results of this procedure will call for further examination when no examination is warranted in
approximately 1 out of 100 dwelling units tested.
0
•
TESTING TIMES:
For the Lead -in -Paint K+L variable reading time mode, the instrument continues to read until it is moved
away from the testing surface, terminated by the user, or the instrument software indicates the reading is
complete. The following table provides testing time information for this testing mode. The times have
been adjusted for source decay, normalized to the initial source strengths as noted above. Source
strength and type of substrate will affect actual testing times. At the time of testing, the instruments had
source strengths of 26.6 and 36.6 mCi.
Testing Times Using K+L ReadinQ Mode Seconds
All Data
Median for laboratory -measured lead levels
m /cm2
Substrate
251h
Median
75th
Pb < 0.25
0.25 < Pb<1.0
1.0 < Pb
Percentile
Percentile
Wood
4
11
19
11
15
11
Drywall
Metal
4
12
18
9
12
14
Brick
8
16
22
15
18
16
Concrete
Plaster
CLASSIFICATION RESULTS:
XRF results are classified as positive if they are greater than or equal to the threshold, and negative if
they are less than the threshold.
DOCUMENTATION:
A document titled Methodology for XRF Performance Characteristic Sheets provides an explanation of
the statistical methodology used to construct the data in the sheets, and provides empirical results from
using the recommended inconclusive ranges or thresholds for specific XRF instruments. For a copy of
Call the National Lead Intormatlon center clearingnouse at 1-tSUU-4Z4-LtHu.
This XRF Performance Characteristic Sheet was developed by the Midwest Research Institute (MRI)
and QuanTech, Inc., under a contract between MRI and the XRF manufacturer. HUD has determined
that the information provided here is acceptable when used as guidance in conjunction with Chapter 7,
Lead -Based Paint Inspection, of HUD's Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead -Based Paint
Hazards in Housing.
3 of 3
LI
•
PRE #15641 PAGE 16
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
DEPARTMENT OF
jW ECOLOGY
Focus on The Universal Waste Rule
State of Washington
Hazardous Waste and Toxics Reduction Program
Revised February 2010
Mercury -containing Equipment
WHY ITMATTERS
(WAC 173-303-573(3-4))
Any business that generates
This publication focuses on the Universal Waste (UW)
dangerous waste must follow
requirements for mercury -containing equipment. Publication
the dangerous waste rules,
Chapter 173-303 WAC. In
number 98-407, The Universal Waste Rule provides more details
Washington State, the
on these requirements and the advantages of UW management.
Universal Waste Rule allows
How is "mercury -containing equipment" defined?
less burdensome management
of these wastes:
Mercury -containing equipment is a broad category of UW
• Batteries, (98-407.a)
including any device or pail of a device that contains elemental
• Mercury -containing
mercury necessary for its operation. Mercury has been used in
equipment (98-407.c)
hundreds of devices at levels ranging from less than a gram up to
. Lamps (98-407.c)
several pounds. A few examples include:
► Thermometers ► Thermostats
Businesses have the choice of
► Barometers ► Tilt switches
managing these wastes as
► Manometers IN. Flame sensors
universal waste or dangerous
waste. Universal waste
.Mercury
-containing equipment does not include:
Mercury as a by-product of manufacturing or
requirements for storage,
transportation, and collection
• waste generated
waste treatment.
are less stringent.
• Elemental mercury such as in vials or jewelry containing drops
of mercury.
• Dental amalgam.
Contact information
• Rubber flooring made with mercury.
Rob Rieck
• Chemical compounds containing mercury (e.g.,
360-407-6751
pharmaceuticals, pesticides, paints, or lab chemicals).
Rori461@ecy.wa.gov
• Intact devices or toys with removable mercury -containing
batteries or lamps (batteries and lamps can be removed and
handled according to their UW category).
A mercury -containing thermostat is defined as a temperature
Special accommodations
control device that contains metallic mercury in an ampule
To ask about the availability of
attached to a bi-metal sensing element. Thermostats are a type of
this document in a version for the
mercury -containing equipment and are managed in the same way,
visually impaired, call the
although alternative labeling is permissible.
Hazardous Waste and Toxics
Reduction Program at 360-407-
6700. Persons with hearing loss,
Accumulation start date
call 711 for Washington Relay
Both used and unused MCE become wastes on the date the handler
Service. Persons with a speech
disability, call 877-833-6341.
decides to discard them.
•
Publication Number: 98-407.b 1
1998; rev. 02/10
•
•
•
Labeling and marking MCE
Label or mark each device or container of
devices with one of the following phrases:
• Universal Waste — Mercury -containing
equipment
• Waste Mercury -containing equipment
• Used Mercury -containing equipment
Labeling and marking thermostats
As one option, you may label or mark single
thermostats or a container of thermostats with
one of the following phrases:
Universal Waste — Mercury thermostat(s)
Waste Mercury thermostat(s)
Used Mercury thermostat(s)
Accumulation and dating
You can accumulate MCE for one year from the
date they are generated. To document this, the
collection container or individual UW device is
typically marked with the first date a device is
placed in it. An extension to the one-year
accumulation limit is allowed if the facility needs
more time to collect enough items to facilitate
proper recovery, treatment, or disposal.
Performance standards for ampules
Ampules removed from thermostats and other
MCE can also be managed as UW. Use a
containment system (e.g., plastic tub under the
work area) to prevent spills during removal.
Store and transport ampules in closed containers
and in a manner that avoids breakage.
Leaks
Place leaking ampules or other MCE in an air-
tight container.
Mercury in open housing
MCE with mercury in an open housing (e.g.,
barometers) can be managed as UW following
appropriate precautions. The open housing can
be removed, sealed airtight and managed the
same as ampules.
Publication Number: 98-407.b 2
•
If not removed, the housing should be sealed
prior to transport and the whole device placed in
a closed container.
Large Quantity Handlers of Universal
Waste (LQHUW)
When a handler exceeds 11,000 pounds (or 2,200
pounds for lamps), they become an LQHUW and
are subject to extra requirements, including:
• Notification to Ecology of LQHUW status,
and which specific types of UW they manage.
• Tracking type and quantity of universal
wastes received and shipped.
• Obtaining a RCRA Site Identification
Number.
Transporting UW mercury -containing
equipment
You may self -transport UW mercury -containing
equipment, complying with applicable U.S.
Department of Transportation regulations. Refer
to Ecology publication number 98-407 The
Universal Waste Rule for details.
A dangerous waste generator has the choice of
managing MCE as UW or under the more
stringent dangerous waste requirements. In most
cases UW management is easier and a preferable
alternative to dangerous waste management. Note
that businesses who generate and manage both
dangerous wastes and UWs are considered
dangerous waste generators and UW handlers.
Regardless if you are a generator or a handler, you
are liable for ensuring your waste is managed
properly once it leaves your site.
Where do I send them?
Universal wastes may be sent to either another
handler (acting as a collection point) or to a
destination facility. Another handler could
include any business that is already managing
UW, government-sponsored collections, or
hazardous waste management firms.
0 Please reuse and recycle
•
JO Businesses that recycle or dispose of UW are
called destination facilities. Ultimately, all UW
must go to a destination facility. They are
subject to dangerous waste regulations for
recyclers and hazardous waste disposal facilities
A facility that only accumulates UW would not
be a destination facility.
•
For a list of firms that offer waste management
services, visit
www.ecy.wa.gov/apps/hwtr/hwsd/default.htm.
The major thermostat manufacturers set up the
Thermostat Recycling Corporation (TRC) to
provide recycling of thermostats at participating
thermostat wholesale stores. Contractors are
encouraged to return old thermostats to the store.
Some stores will accept used thermostats from
homeowners and other types of businesses.
Participating stores can be located at
http://www.tliei*mostat-recycle.org/.
How do I manage household MCE?
Homeowners are not required to manage their
thermostats and MCE as UW, but are strongly
encouraged to take them to a local household
hazardous waste collection facility if available.
Why is MCE hazardous?
Mercury -containing devices can contain high
levels of mercury that makes them a dangerous
waste when discarded. Thermostats and
thermometers are one of the largest sources of
mercury in landfills. When thrown into the
garbage, the ampule or glass can break, spilling
the mercury. Some MCE can break while in use,
spreading mercury droplets and contaminating
the area. Because mercury is very toxic to
humans and wildlife, it is important to prevent
releases to the environment. To avoid future
liability, replace mercury -containing devices
with non -mercury alternatives.
Department of Ecology Regions
http://www.(>cy.wrt. ;ov/programs/hwtr
Pend
San JuanOrW39
e GRnn090"
I'll F-ry ste rttry
�Is!a,d
[.l filbvl {le`jlnR
11
+•• 1a+gm th•i•.o
(509) 329-3400
Narlh•nusl Region 6ov(;os
• (4Spo25) 649 7000 �,
unc6n
ce.11,11 Flag ^n
(509) 575-2490 G°S1
--- WNman
KrlLhr,
Adams
Souihwam Region — -
(360) 407-6300 FrarOn Gated
vukinxl &i{'C'
Wino Watts Aw!h
WOMOak�xn
K carat
Publication Number: 98-407.b 3 0. Please reuse and recycle
•
•
•
' • •
PRE #15641
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
PAGE 17
E
JAM,
�J
0
9
PACIFIC
z a
J
w
z
O�
r
a
O
z
1�
l�
J
00
CD_
it
v
L V
Oc`
" t
u_
4'
U
N L-
ai 6J
.D
O
L
W
4—
Q
L
O
+-'
t
i
(d
N
�
cNd
a
�
•�
N
i
N
_
�C
(A
=
4-j
�-
E
Q
4-)
Q
U
yL-
L
IJ
'N
`W
M
W
Q
Vf
4-J-'
�--
®
N
N
L
Q
(A
A
A
C
(A
Q
U
Q
+j
9
PACIFIC
z a
J
w
z
O�
r
a
O
z
1�
l�
J
00
CD_
it
v
L V
Oc`
" t
u_
4'
U
N L-
ai 6J
.D
O
L
W
•
w -
O
V)
4-J Q
N p[
W
v =
•cr C
M
,E
U
4
a Q
E U
O
0
0
N
PACIFIC
Z 0
Z �
J ❑C❑
L7
z
o�
• z
S
Ln
00
0
it
13)a)
v
u
L-
W
"O
O
1
CL
n
W
t4
O
a)
�r
• ®
rci
C
'E
o
a0
U
®
•y
N
4-J
U
Ln
®
s
O
s
w -
O
V)
4-J Q
N p[
W
v =
•cr C
M
,E
U
4
a Q
E U
O
0
0
N
PACIFIC
Z 0
Z �
J ❑C❑
L7
z
o�
• z
S
Ln
00
0
it
13)a)
v
u
L-
W
"O
O
1
CL
n
W
I . t
•
0
0
LO
CD
O o a
LO N�
N U O O 0
o
r �' a
O
� -D m
L! = LJ +
40—
LTA `
E V1 ft5
�2 106
E 000 0 o
0-0 CO o
v —Z3
o
U U W N LL
� 4°'dam
IUN
®-tel L - CZ Cj)CD
.s CLZ
a s a)
.0 o U
M.2 �7
4i v Q fi o
(D N
•� � O C tCs � is
O
i.s ((SLn
co
O
N �
I. H J
0 0
q�PP��NT OF c04
® National Voluntary
Laboratory Accreditation Program
• �O S"AT Es OF
SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISOJEC 17025:2005
Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc.
6510 Southcenter Boulevard
Suite #40
Tukwila, WA 98188
Mr. William F. Golloway
Phone: 206-244-8965 Fax: 206-244-9096
E -Mail: fgolloway@pacrimenv.com
URL: http://www.pacrimenv.com
BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS (PLM)
NVLAP LAB CODE 101631-0
NVLAP Code Designation /Description
18/A01 EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation
Samples
18/A03 EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials
2015-04-01 through 2016-03-31
Effective dates For the-Na-ft-d-n-aTrn-s-titu e o an ar s and Technology
Page 1 of 1 NVLAP-01S (REV. 2005-05-19)