15-103760�•�a~�� Po Bax 1212
Puyallup 98371
Telephone: 253.84
1.971(
vnxw.encaec.com
Environmental Corporation
Barceio Homes
Ms. Nadia Maksimachuk
P.J. Lox 1733
Auburn WA 98071
RESUBMITTED
MAY 0 9 2016
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CDS
October 12, 2015
RE: Wetland & Stream Delineation Report Addendum # 1
Barcelo Homes Site Development
3260539th Avenue South, Federal Way, King County WA 98001
Current Land Use: Forest
Proposed Use: Residential Development — SFD
Dear Ms, Maksimachuk:
The City of Federal has requested that EnCo Environmental Corporation (EnCo) prepare
an addendum to the wetland delineation report that was completed last fall This
addendum supersedes the EnCo Wetland & Stream Delineation with Standard Buffer
Width Determination, dated December 17, 2014.
1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose for performing this addendum is to update information related to the final
buffer width of Wetland D, the incorporation of Wetland E as a 'bog component" of
Wetland D. the final boundaries and buffers of Wetlands A, B & C. and the final result of
the wetland assessment of Test Plot 13.
2.0 BACKGROUND
A wetland and stream delineation was performed on the project site by EnCo as
documented in the report dated December 17, 2014. Due to the complexity of the critical
areas and regulatory buffers of wetlands associated with shorelines and wetlands not
associated with shorelines, the City of Federal required that the EnCo wetland and stream
delineation report be reviewed by their third party consultant (Perteet, Inc.).
On May 5, 2015, Perteet Inc. conducted a site visit of the project site as part of this review.
In attendance were Jonathan Kemp, Professional Wetland Scientist of EnCo; Jason
Walker, Professional Wetland Scientist with Perteet, and Becky Chapin, Associate Planner
with the City of Federal Way. The purpose of this visit was to conduct a critical areas
review of the property based on the EnCo report, resource documents, and other reports
prepared for this area. The review also included interpretation of jurisdictional critical area
code and shoreline regulations in relation to wetland buffers associated with shorelines.
Site Assessment • Wetland • Remediation • Habitat
r
m
3.0 DISCUSSION
3.1 Wetlands D & E
Based on that review and after several follow up discussions with the City of Federal Way
Planning Department and wetland and shoreline staff at the Washington Department of
Ecology (ECOLOGY) it was concluded that the Federal Way shoreline regulations does
not have language to utilize the Ecology Wetland Rating System for Western Washington
for wetlands associated with shorelines. At this point in time wetland categories
associated with shorelines are based solely on FWRC 10.175.020 and FWRC 15.10.260.
These two shoreline codes do not allow for a "dual rating" of a wetland that has a Category
I bog component incorporated within a Category Il or Ill forested or scrub/shrub wetland.
For this reason the presence of the identified bog component, identified as Wetland E in
the EnCo wetland delineation is now mapped as part of Wetland D and must be rated as a
Category I wetland with a 200 foot wide standard shoreline wetland buffer. Wetland E is
now identified as a "bog component" of Wetland D as shown on the attached updated
wetland exhibit (FIGURE 5 — 2014 (Amended 10. 12.15) and in TABLE 11 — WETAND &
BUFFER CHARACTERISTICS for Wetland D.
3.2 Wetlands A, B & C
A question was raised by the City of Federal Way whether Wetlands A, B, and C meet the
recognized criteria to be considered as a wetland mosaic. Wetland mosaics are defined in
the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:
Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0). In general, wetland mosaics
are areas of interspersed wetland and upland that lay over the landscape in a mosaic
pattern and are too closely associated to be easily delineated individually. The wetlands in
question (Wetlands A, B, and C) are individually distinguishable, not closely associated
pursuant to the regulatory guidance, and do not meet the "mosaic" definition. Perteet
concurred with the boundaries, ratings, and buffers of Wetlands A, B, and C as presented
in the EnCo report.
3.3 Depression Landform Located North of Wetland C
As part of the wetland review process Pe, Leet Inc. requested EnCo to assess a
depressional landform that is located about 76 feet north of northern edge of Wetland C.
One test plot was assessed (Test Plot 13; by EnCo on May 6, 2015 (FIGURE 5 — 2014
(Amended 10.12.15). This test plot was determined not to be a wetland as presented in
the EnCo report dated May 11, 2016 (Attachment*,. This conclusion was supported by
Perteet, Inc. in their Memorandum submitted to the City of Federal way, dated May 21,
2015.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
1. Wetland D is a Category I wetland with a 200 foot wide standard shoreline wetland
buffer. Wetland E is now identified as a "bog component" of Wetland D.
Site Assessment • 'd"Jetland • Remediation • Habitat
2
2. The boundaries, ratings, and buffers of Wetlands A, B, and C remain as presented
in the EnCo report.
3. Test Plot 13 was determined not to be a wetland.
Sincerely,
.. , ft . ..
Jonathan M. Kemp
President, EnCo Environmental (Corporation, P.W.S. # 2110
Site Assessment • Wetland • Remediation • Habitat
3
1W NAM) A
I
, '11H, FRY
IfAH, 7A f M I
vvr7, ".N.0 p
AN'Ll s'?, F
", I I,* It, o
IF 1:
HAS I I I P1,11!
MF!_1 N(J :-1 C 111,3'
HUi-itk AT)iH. o'
,1lI;?A,vv 0
CA i I,Ok y i
ri"al 7,1 f �Fv: ,
,F FLANO SQ� I I
'Ll'I , 1, All;.? i;,+ lo()
RL)"IF L,S
R� 41
ARIA.
ohymmIN
SHPV,KS2
'IRON?
R.rf*,-Al SITRACK,IPIA
01F, `,lip". 10; sl �I
IN THE NE 114 SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W,M.
BARCELO HOMES
WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION
FIGURE 5 - 2014 (AMENDED .10112115)
SOUTH
325TH
PLACE
4-11U:��
11-OLk"", WAY, AIA -.001
18, ovo
12
'—,lIIp '.:ljl
I "y -----------
PC Box 1212
Puyallupe98371
Telephone: 253.84
1.871 G
,�E Cd www.encoec.com
Environmental Corporation
Barcelo Homes
Ms. Nadia Maksimachuk
P.C. Box 1733
Auburn WA 98071
RE: Teat Plot 13 Letter Report
Barcelo Homes Site Development
32605 391h Avenue South, Federal Way, King County, WA 98001
Current Land Use: Forest
Proposed Use: Residential Development — SFD
Dear Ms. Maksimachuk:
May 11, 2015
EnCo Environmental Corporation (EnCo) has completed the additional test plot (Test Plot
13) that was requested for completion by Mr. Jason Walker. P.A.. of Perteet Engineers
during our site visit that was held on, May 6, 2015. The site visit was held in concert with
Ms. Becky Chapin, Associate Planner, of the City of f=ederal Way.
••e- z
The purpose for performing the work was to determine if a small depression located about
75 feet north of northern edge of Wetland C was wetland or upland.
SCOPE OF WORK
1. Established one (1) test plot in the small depression as shown on FIGURES —
WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION (ATTACHED). The test plot was hand -
sketched onto the existing figure.
2. Collected and evaluated data for topographic features, soil characteristics, types of
vegetation, surface and near surface hydrology; habitat, and observed animal and plant
species in the test plot.
3 Determined whether or not the test plot was a wetland according to the three
established wetland criteria; hydric soil, wetland hydrology, and dominant hydrophytic
vegetation according to jurisdictional government agency methodology.
4. Prepared a hand sketch (not to scale) depicting the approximate location of the test plot
over a professionally land surveyed diagram (FIGURE 5)-
5, Prepared a photo log (ATTACHED)
6. Completed a wetland determination field data form.
7. Prepared this letter report summarizing the findings of the study.
Site Assessment • Wetland • Remediation • Habitat
The presence or absence of a wetland in the test plot was verified by collecting scientific
data in the field. Wetlands are defined by the USACOE and ECOLOGY as having
conditions that meet the technical requirements for being a wetland according to the
established criteria for wetland hydrology; hydric soil, and dominant hydrophytic
vegetation.
A summary of the rationale for making the upland determination for the test plot is listed in
TABLE 1. More detailed information and data pertaining to the wetland / upland
determination for the test plot is presented on the field data form (ATTACHED).
TABLE 1
WETLAND I UPLAND DETERMINATION RATIONALE
Plot Hydric Soil Indicators
Dominant Hydrophytic
Wetland
Wetland
Jurisdictional
# ! in Upper Part (<12")
Vegetation
Hydrology
/Upland
Yes
No
No
Depleted Matrix
20% (50/20 Pule)
1 Secondary
i Upland
i No
IOYR,2,2
Beaked Hazelnut - FACU
Nater Stained
13 10YR, 3,2
Salmonberry - FAC
Leaves
No Redox e
Indian Plum - FACU
f
Gravely Silt Loam
Trailing Blackberry - FACU
(Native)
English Ivy - FACU
i
CONCLUSION
Test Plot 13 was determined not to be a wetland.
CONDITIONS
This report is presented without warranty; express or implied, except that the services
associated with this letter report are rendered by EnCo in good faith and according to the
standards generally practiced by professional wetland scientists in the area of wetland and
stream evaluation.
This critical area determination for the test plot was limited to the portions of the project as
defined in this report and as directed by the reviewing consultant (Perteet). The work did
not include performing a professional land survey to locate the test plot.
Sincerely.
Jonathan M. Kemp
President, EnCo Environmental Corporation, P.VV.S.
Site Assessment • Wetland • Remediation - Habitat
2
JUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIL , DATA FORM
Project Site Name: 32605 391 Avenue South Site Development City / County: Federal Way, King
Applicant / Owner: Barcelo Homes Project Site Address: 32605 39h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA
Professional Wetland Scientist: Jonathan M. Kemp Job Number: WTJK-Barcelo-Federal-Way-1
Proposed Land Use Residential Development - SFD Current Land Use: Forest
Plot Size: Z Diameter 12' ❑ Radius NESW ❑ Rectangle to & to ❑ Transect
CLIMATIC/HYDROLOGIC conditions typical for this time of year? ® Yes ❑ No
NORMAL environmental conditions exist at the plant community ® Yes ❑ No W E
SIGNIFICANTLY DISTURBED ® No ❑ Vegetation ❑ Soil ❑ Hydrology
NATURALLY PROBLEMATIC ® No ❑ Vegetation ❑ Soil ❑ Hydrology
PLOT #1: 13 Plot = ❑ Wetland ® Upland ❑ Transitional ❑ Stream
Field Crew ®JK ❑ MK
Matrix Color
% in Pedon
Munsell (Moist)
FHtie Value Crimma
Plot Time: 1200 -12:45
Location (NESW/Flag): N of Wetland C Landform: Small Depression
w
i
FACU
z
U.1
Field Date 05.06.15
STR: NEQ Sec 18. Twn 21 N. Rnq 04E
c9
Weather M. Cloudy. Some Sun, Few Light Showers, 48 to 50 Degrees
GPS Lat/Lon /Datum: 47.3097 Lat: 122.2857 Long N
Plot Size: Z Diameter 12' ❑ Radius NESW ❑ Rectangle to & to ❑ Transect
CLIMATIC/HYDROLOGIC conditions typical for this time of year? ® Yes ❑ No
NORMAL environmental conditions exist at the plant community ® Yes ❑ No W E
SIGNIFICANTLY DISTURBED ® No ❑ Vegetation ❑ Soil ❑ Hydrology
NATURALLY PROBLEMATIC ® No ❑ Vegetation ❑ Soil ❑ Hydrology
TYPE: C=(;oncentrahm U=Uepleion R,'r-Redu,-ed i•,',atrix, CS=Coveredicoated Sand Grains Redox. F = F -vv j<p/o). C = Common to 201V P = Prominent (>201io) Location PL = Pore Lining. M = Matrix®
Soil
Layers
(fbg)
Sample
Depth
(fbg)
Matrix Color
% in Pedon
Munsell (Moist)
FHtie Value Crimma
Soil Texture. Plant Material, Moisture. Structure, Fill, Till
I Moisture Dry. Slight Moist. Moist, Very Moist Very Wet. Saturated
Cohesionless Loose. Dense Cohesive: Soft, Stiff, Hard
Other: Heavy or Light Clay Peat: % Distinct Plant Parts
Redox Type
(C I D 1 RM)
Redox
Location
(PL / M)
Redox Color
(Moist)
(HVC)
F / C 1 P (%)
FACU
Litter: 0.03'
Leaf, grass, needle, rush, sedge, seed; cone, catkin, twig, branch: log. root. frond, cane, mushroom, lichen. fibrous.. gall. mulch
_
Moss: 15%
_
Hydric Soil Indicators ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Transitional ❑ Relic
0-080
0.15
t0YR,2,2+
Very dark brown gravely silt loam w fine sand. few root ft v moist, so
❑ (F1) Loamy mucky mineral (>.33 thick. starting in top 0.5')
❑ (A3) Black histic (peat/muck>.67 thick in top .5' surface., v53, c<_2)
rn
080 - 1 2
0.50
10'YR,3.2
Very dark grey brown silt loam with sand moist, soft
depleted or gley OR 16 of fragmented layer has C<2. Loam/clay
Redox dark sfc (>.33' in top 1' w V53; C-<2 w >-5% distinct I prominent redox)
above dept matrix. V53 & C152). Sand V53 & C51 w > 70% organics
1 ? 0
0.90
10YR.3,3
Dark brown gravely sandy silt loam, 1/8round. moist, soft
C M
5YR.4.6 <2%
❑ (F12) Very shallow dark sfc (fine black soil, no redox. shallow to bedrock)
❑ (S4) Sandy gleyed matrix (60% or more of layer, starts 5_0.5`)
1.35
2.5Y,4,2
Dark grey brown gravely sandy silt. 1116" irregular, moist. stiff
C M
7.5YR.4.415%
❑ (A10) 2 cm muck (0.06' thick, VC 5_3/1 starting in top 0.5')
❑ Dark topsoil.. decayed litter: aerobic, no depletions under topsoil layer @ <1
❑ (72) Red material (7.5YR or redder. 0 33' in top 1 , `vC54/4 & >20/o redox)
❑ Concretions and nodules without halos
❑ Notes
❑ Other:
Note: Depression is about 12' wide by 10' long
Redox Depth: 1.1' -1.5'+
TYPE: C=(;oncentrahm U=Uepleion R,'r-Redu,-ed i•,',atrix, CS=Coveredicoated Sand Grains Redox. F = F -vv j<p/o). C = Common to 201V P = Prominent (>201io) Location PL = Pore Lining. M = Matrix®
Spade E-1Probe❑ Auger Hole depth 1.5 bgs 50% root 0.05' bgs
Max root 0.10' bgs ® Hydric below roots Restrictive layer (<1.5'): ❑Y ®N
Topographic Alteration: Z No ElFili ❑ Till ❑ Pasture ❑
Scarify ❑ Grade ❑ Dump ❑ Deforest ❑ Ditch ❑ Created ❑ Low
Compaction (lbs/in2): Soil: ❑ Very Dry ❑ Dry ❑ Slight Moist E Moist ❑ Very Moist ❑ Wet ❑ Very Wet ❑ Saturated
3" - 6 9 _ 12
"
15 18 21 240'
FACU
Mapped Series Aqb Aldenaood Gravelly Sandy Loam Taxonomy Isotic Mesic Aquic Dystroxerepts Drainage Class Moderately Well
Included Series Norma
® Mapped as Hydric ❑ Mapped as Hydric Inclusions
Hydric Soil Indicators ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Transitional ❑ Relic
Beaked Hazelnut Cor lus comuta
❑ (Al) Histosol (>1.33716" in top 2.67732'1
❑ (S6) Stripped matrix (starts <-0.5, missing Fe/MNOrganic, diffuse & >100/0)
❑ (A2) Histic epipedon (organic soil >0.67'1&' in top 2 i/ aquic conditions)
❑ (F1) Loamy mucky mineral (>.33 thick. starting in top 0.5')
❑ (A3) Black histic (peat/muck>.67 thick in top .5' surface., v53, c<_2)
❑ (F2) Loamy gleyed matrix (80% or more of layer. starts <-1.0')
❑ (A4) Hydrogen sulfide odor (low medium high)
® (F3) Depleted matrix (>609/o matrix >.17 thick in top .5' or 0.5' in top .83' w C<2)
® (A11)Depleted below dark sfc (>60% matrix in at least .5' in top 1 is
❑ (F6) Redox dark sfc ( >.33' in top 1' wVs3, C51 w ?2% distinct / prominent redox)
depleted or gley OR 16 of fragmented layer has C<2. Loam/clay
Redox dark sfc (>.33' in top 1' w V53; C-<2 w >-5% distinct I prominent redox)
above dept matrix. V53 & C152). Sand V53 & C51 w > 70% organics
❑ (F7) Depleted dark surface (Depletions: V>5 & C<2, 0.33' all in top 1 AND:
® (Al2)Thick dark surface (>600/o matrix in at least .5 in top 1' has C<2 and
Matrix 5311 & >10% redox depletion OR Matrix 5312 & >200/0 redox depletion)
layer above dept matrix has V52.5 & C51 to >1' Upper: V<_3 & C<-1
❑ (F8) Redox depression (>t 0.17' layer top 0 5' AND >50/o redox cont distinct/prominent
❑ (S1) Sandy mucky mineral (Z in top 0.5)
❑ (F12) Very shallow dark sfc (fine black soil, no redox. shallow to bedrock)
❑ (S4) Sandy gleyed matrix (60% or more of layer, starts 5_0.5`)
Negative Hydric Soil Indicator
['j (S5) Sandy redox It 33 MiCk >60A C<2 stay < 5'bgs & >2% redox)
❑ Relic features (import, tilled, or historical feature):
Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils
❑ Redox feature (redox concentration - not distinct / close to matrix color)
❑ (A10) 2 cm muck (0.06' thick, VC 5_3/1 starting in top 0.5')
❑ Dark topsoil.. decayed litter: aerobic, no depletions under topsoil layer @ <1
❑ (72) Red material (7.5YR or redder. 0 33' in top 1 , `vC54/4 & >20/o redox)
❑ Concretions and nodules without halos
❑ Notes
❑ Other:
EnCo Environmental Corporation Pagel of2 5/12/2015
Flora in Plot
Tree, Sapling, Shrub, Herb, Forb, Emergent, Woody Vine
Indicator
Status
class
I, :aver
Flora in Plot ❑ Senescence ❑ Sprouting ❑ Mature
❑ Fail Color Q Flower Emergence
Indicator strata
Status Comex
No Trees in the Test Plot
FACU
T 80
Out of Plot Plants:
z
Beaked Hazelnut Cor lus comuta
FACU
S22
Candy flower (Claytonia sibirica
FAC
0
Salmonberr Rubus s ectabilis
FRC
IS18
Sword fern (Polystichum munitum
FACU
Q
Indian Plum Oemleria cerasiformis
FACU
S18
Western red cedar ahuja licata
FAC
w
Trailing Blackberry Rubus ursinus
FACU
H 10
Big Leafed Maple (Acer macro h Ilum
FACU
w
English I Hedera helix
FACU
H 5
Bare at Ground Surface: 651/o
BOLD species are DOMINANT by 50/20 Rule
Species Dominance by 50/20 Rule for OBL. FACW, FAC:
20%
Out of Plot Plants NESW: Candy flomr; sword fern. Western red Cedar
lOcclusion at Eye Level ❑ V Dense [-]Dense ®Medium []Open ❑S arse
EnCo Environmental Corporation Pagel of2 5/12/2015
OUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION FI. ) DATA FORM
Project Site Name: 32605 39h Avenue South Site Development City I County: Federal Way; King
Applicant I Owner: Barcelo Homes Project Site Address. 32605 391", Avenue South, Federal Way, WA
Professional Wetland Scientist Jonathan M. Kemp Job Number: WTJK-Barcelo-Federal-Way-1
Proposed Land Use Residential Development - SFD Current Land Use: Forest
PLOT #: 13 COWARDIN CLASS - In Plot ❑ Tree 230% Q Shrub/Sapling/Vine _>30% ❑ Herb/Forb >_30% ❑ Aquatic Bed (rooted) >30%
Top Canopy Species: Big Leaf Maple Undisturbed Corridor >10 acres (NESW) Diversity ❑Low (<5) QMedium (5-19)❑High (>19)
Upland Invasive >10% ❑Y QN (NESW) ❑ n/a Wetland Invasive >10% ❑Y ❑N (NESW) ® n/a
Plants fail dominance test w/ positive indicators for hydric soil & wetland hydrology? ❑ Y ❑ N Q N/A If yes perform Prevalence Index test.
Q Down Wood ❑ Runner Log ❑ Stump (Cut, Rotten) ❑ Perch QSnags (>20'165) ❑ Brush Pile ❑ Shrubs Over Water []Grove
QFragmented (NESW) ❑ Restoration (NESW) Ground Light ❑ Full Sun ❑ Most Sun ❑ Some Sun ❑ Most Shade ® Full Shade
Terrain: ❑Flat ❑Terrace QDepression Distinct ❑Depression Diffuse ❑Slope Sight ❑ Slope Distinct ❑Rolling ❑Ravine (>15%) ❑Cliff
Relief: QConcave ❑Convex ❑Smooth Slope Up: NESW 1% Slope Down: NESW 0%
Primary Indicator ❑ No Indicators Need 1 Primary or 2 Secondary
71(A1) Surface water (GS) r 3;, ❑(B5) Iron deposits ❑(C3) Oxidized rhizospheres ❑(C9) Saturation (imagery)
❑(A2) high water table <_;z ❑(B6) Surface soil cracks 7(C4) Reduced iron @ surface ❑(D2) Geomorphic position
❑(A3) Saturated (GS) s11 ❑(B7) Inundation (imagery) ❑(C6) Fe reduction (tilled soils) El Q3) Shallow aquitard
❑(B1) Water marks ❑(88) Sparsely veg. concave surf. ❑(D1) Stunted/stressed plants ❑(D5) FAC -neutral test
❑(1132) Sediment deposits ❑(B11) Salt crust I Encrust Sfc. Q(B9) Water stained leaves El (D6) Raised ant mounds
0(83) Drift deposits 0(B13) Aquatic invertebrates ❑ (61011 Drainage pattems ❑(D7) Frost -heaved hummocks
❑(B4) Algae mat or crust ❑(C1) Hydrogen sulfide odor ❑ (C2) Dry -season water table ❑ Scouring or well/ gauge data
>- Cascading ❑Y ❑N Water using ❑Y ❑Pl Saturation depth (bgs) EN ❑YWater depth (bgs) Q"t ❑Y:
❑ FAC deciduous tree roots > 1' bgs ❑ Anaerobic soil / water Q Aerobic soil! water
J❑ Open water: ❑ Shallow pools: Deepest inundation: Wetland outlet? ElN ❑ Y NESW Wetland all on-site. ❑ Y ❑ N
W Recent weather affected the observed hydrology? Q Y ❑ N Distance of seasonal water to perennial water in dry months (NESW) ® na
C:1 Q Normal hydrology source: ❑ Artificial water source. ❑ Morphological adaption
= Rate of water percolation: ❑ N/A ❑ Very Slow ❑ Slow Q Medium ❑ Fast ❑ Very Fast
Period of inundation or saturation <1' in loam and <.5' in sand in G. S. ❑ <5% Q 5%<12.5% ❑ >12 5% (>26 days)
Water appearance: ❑ Tannin sheen ❑ Hydrocarbon sheen ❑ Clearly hydric soil
Near surface hydro Z Precip EJ Surface Flow ❑ Groundwater ❑ Seep ❑ Spring ❑ Lake/Pond ❑ River/Stream L Marine Estuary
Stream EN ❑Y Riparian Zone ❑N ❑Y Floodplain ❑N ❑Y Floodway ❑N ❑Y
Stream bank height: OHWM width Water depth: Flow rate: ft/sec
Stream type: ❑ Ephemeral ❑ Perennial ❑ Intermittent ❑ Temporary ❑ Fish bearing ❑ Non -fish ❑ Culvert
Stream bed: ❑ Bedrock ❑ Rubble ❑ Cobble -gravel ❑ Sand ❑ Mud ❑ Organic ❑ Ditch
❑ Riffles & Pools ❑ Plunge Pools. ❑ Armoring / Stabilization ❑ Undercut or Steep Banks (>20'16.5')
EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 2 oft 5/12/20,15
Annelid 2 Worm FlOther Reported by Others
Fig" ❑ Salmon ❑ Trout ❑ Mudminnow ❑ Other
Amphibian ❑ Frog-_[] Toad ❑ Salamander__. E]Newt __ F-1EggMasses
Mammal Q Squirrel ❑ Gophers ❑ Skunk/Possum El Deer ❑ Elk El Dangerous: Bear, Cougar, Mt. Lion [:1 Other,
w
Bird ❑ Turkey ❑ Warbler ❑ Woodpecker ❑ Crow ❑ Raptor ❑ Raven ❑ Dove ❑ Waterfowl ❑ Shore
X
Q Passerine ❑ Hummingbird Q Robin Q Sparrow ❑ Blue Jay ❑ Chickadee ❑ Blue Bird ❑ Goldfinch ❑ Red W Blackbird
0
Q Other Birds: Wren Tit
=
Reptile ❑ Snake ❑ Lizard ❑ Other
u)
i Insect ❑ Gall wasp ❑ Bee ❑ Butterfly ❑ Moth ❑ Ant ❑ Spider ❑ Beetle ❑ Caterpillar ❑ Dragon fly ❑ Fly ❑ Mosquito
LL
Mollusk ❑ Snail ❑ Slug ❑ Other Other Invertebrates
LU
-
Wildlife Indicators
❑ Nest_ ❑ Den ❑ Burrow ❑Flyover ❑ Feather ❑Fur ❑ Wildlife trail ❑ Ant hill
a
❑ Seed/cone pile ❑ Scat ❑ Rest areas Q Cavity In Snap [ i Bone / Carcass ❑ Gnawed stump ❑Dam r' but
❑ Shed skin ❑ Hive / honeycomb ❑ Egg castings ❑ Rock outcrops or piles ❑ Rip rap
❑ Bog ❑ Heritage Wetland ❑ Estuary ❑ Coastal Lagoon ❑ Interdunal NOTE
❑ Priority Species: ❑ Threatened: ❑ Sensitive: __ _ ❑ Domestic. _
Flora Food Source: fruit, bevy; pollen, nectar, bud; leaf; twig, root, bark; sap, cone, seed, grain, nut, atom, bulb, corm, other,—
ther._Animal
AnimalFood Source: worm, insect, rodent, other: Trash/Junk: ❑Y NN
HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION PRESENT? Z Yes No El Assumed
VEGETATION CRITERION PRESENT? ❑Yes Q No
iHYDROPHYTIC
WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION PRESENT? ❑ Yes ® No
IS THE TEST PLOT WITHIN A WETLAND? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Suspect
❑ NWI mapped ❑ County/City mapped ❑ Small -Size ❑ Created ❑ Isolated ❑ Suspect Isolated
Artificial ['lYes []No El Suspect (test pit, road ruts, irrigatlon, dam, dike, ditch, swale, canal, lagoon, false pond, mine, landscape feature)
EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 2 oft 5/12/20,15
"City of Federal Way
Community & Econ. Dev. Services
33325 8th Ave S
Federal Way, WA 98003
Ph: (253) 835-2607 Fax: (253) 835-2609
Project Name: BARCELO HOMES LOT 4
Project Address: 3811 S 326TH ST
Building - Single Family
Permit #: 15 -103760 -00 -SF
Inspection Request Line: (253) 835-3050
Parcel Number: 152104 9022
Project Description: NEW - Construction of a new 3740 square foot, 2 -story residence'with 50 sgft covered
entry, 588 sgft deck, and a 973 sqft attached garage. *** Proposed selling price: $536,280,6
bedrooms ***
Owner
A1211lican
Contractor
Lender
BARCELO HOMES INC.
JONATHAN LEMONS
BARCELO HOMES INC
OWNER IS LENDER
PO BOX 1733
LEMONS ARCHITECTURE PLLC
BARCEHI869J9 (4/29/18)
New / Additional Sq. Feet - Total ..........................
AUBURN WA 98071-1733
600 IST AVE SUITE 622
PO BOX 1733
Residence (1 or 2
SEATTLE WA 98104
AUBURN WA 98071
Census Category: 101- New Single Family House
Includes:
#1 #2 #3 #4
Occupancy Class:
R-3
Construction Type:
Type V - B
Occupancy Load
V - B
Floor Areas . ft.
3,740 1 0 0 0
Additional Permit information
New/ Additional Sq. Feet - 1st Floor....................2398
Occupancy # I - Area (Sq. Feet).............................3740
New./ Additional Sq. Feet - 3rd Floor...............:....0
Basic Plan?...........................................................
New / Additional Sq. Feet - Basement...................0
New / Additional Sq. Feet - Deck ..........................
Occupancy # 1 - Construction Type .......................Type
V - B
New / Additional Sq. Feet - Garage .......................973
New / Additional Sq. Feet - Other ..........................
Occupancy # 1 - Class.............................................R-3
New / Additional Sq. Feet - Total ..........................
Plumbing to be Included?.......................................Yes
Occupancy # 1 -Use ...............................................
Residence (1 or 2
family)
New / Additional Sq. Feet - 2nd Floor...................1342
Occupancy # I - Area (Sq. Feet).............................3740
Basic Plan?...........................................................
No
New / Additional Sq. Feet - Deck ..........................
588
Mechanical to be Included? ....................................
es
New / Additional Sq. Feet - Other ..........................
50
New / Additional Sq. Feet - Total ..........................
5351
Mechanical Fixtures r
Ducting ........................................... 1 Fans................................................ 9 Fireplace Inserts............................. 2
Furnaces ......................................... 1 Gas Piping ...................................... 1 Gas Pipe Outlets............................. 5
Hot Water Tanks ............................ 1
Plumbing Fixtures
Bathtubs ......................................... 4 Dishwashers................................... 2 Drains............................................. 3
Lavatories ....................................... 7 Sinks..................I............................. 3 Water Closets................................. 5
HoseBibbs..................................... 3
CONDITIONS:
An automatic fire sprinkler system is required. No framing inspection until the sprinkler system is installed
and approved.
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY a bond must be put in place for frontage improvements. See ROW Modification
16 -103261 -SM letter dated 7/26/16. Ann D.
PERMIT EXPIRES Saturday, February 4, 2017 �► � "'
* x -
".
Perm449stted on Mondani, August 8, 2016
� l
I hereby certify that the above information is correct and that the construction on the above described property and
the occupancy and the use will be in accordance with the laws, rules and regulations of the State of Washington
an the City of Federal Way.
Owner or agent: Date:
City of Federal Way
Certificate of Occupancy
This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 110.2 of the International Building Code certifying that
at the time of issuance, this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the City regulating building
construction or use. This certificate is valid ONLY when endorsed bye staff.
Tenant Name: BARCELO HOMES LOT 4
Address: 3811 S 326TH ST
Permit #: 15 -103760 -00 -SF
Includes:
#1 #2 #3 #4
Occupancy Class:
R-3
Construction Type:
Type V - B
Occupancy Load
Floor Area (sq. ft.)
3,740 1 0 0 0
Owner Name: BARCELO HOMES INC.
Owner Address: PO BOX 1733
AUBURN WA 98071-1733
Building Official Date
The priority focus in the review and inspection made by the City prior to issuance of this Certificate was on those matters which
experience has shown most severiy affect the health and safety of the general public. Although the City has made as complete a
review and inspection as is reasonably possible (within budgetary time and personnel limitations), the City neither guarantees nor
warrants to the owner / occupant or to any other person that this Certificate evidences strict compliance with each and every
ordinance or regulation of the City or the State of Washington affecting the construction or use of said structure or the land upon
which itis situated. Such compliance is the responglbility of the owner and / or occupant of the premises.
Federal I Vay
PERMIT #:
Project:
THIS CARD IS TO REMAIN ON-SITE 0
Construction Inspection Record
INSIRECT14N REQUESTS: (253) 835-3050
15 -103760 -00 -SF Address: 3811 S 326TH ST
BARCELO HOMES INC. FEDERAL WAY, WA
Scheduled inspections may be failed if this card is not on-site. DO NOT LOSE THIS CARD. Inspections are listed as close to sequential order as
possible (read left to right, top to bottom). Please schedule inspections as appropriate. Work must not be covered until it is approved Check with your
inspector if you are unsure about any of the inspections or the inspection sequence. On-going inspections are logged on the back of this card.
r
SWM -P con Site Mtg ( 00)
Approved
ByDate — _ l
0 InitialErosion Control (4 5)
To be done prior to breaking ground
By Date
Footings/Setback 4110)
Approved to place concrete
By Date 01 ` a 1 l ip
0
Plumbing Groundwork (4190)
Foundation Wall (4115)
❑ Drainage/Downspout (4040)
0
Plumbing Groundwork (4190)
Approved to place concrete ?4)
By
OYed to backfill
By
Approved to cover
By
R,,j Date '11,30))&
By
Date
By
Date
Slab/Co crete Floor (4255)
❑
Underfloor Framing (4285)
Floor Sheathing (4105)
Approved to place concrete
Approved to sheath floor
Approved to install flooring
By
Date
By
4f,3 Date 101 Z 1(Q
By
Date
Shear Walls (4245)
Roof Sheathing (4220)Rough
Plumbing (4230)
Approved to install siding
Approved to install roofing
Approved
By
Date
By
Date
By
Date
Mechanical Rough -in (4165)
❑
Gas Piping (4125)
0
Fire/Draft Stops (4095)
Approved
Approved to release test
Approved
By
Date
By
Date
By
Date,
Interim Erosion Control (4370)
prior to scheduling a Framing inspection;
Framing (4120)
Approved
Electrical, Plumbing & Mechanical Rough -in and
Approved to insulate
By
Date
Fire/Draft Stop inspections must be signed -off and
By
Date
approved. IBC 104.3.4
Insulation (4150)
Gypsum Wallboard Nailing (4130)
0
Final Erosion Control (4375)
Approved to install wallboard
Approved to install mud & tape
Approved
By
Date
By
Date
By
Date
Final - Mechanical (4065)
Final - Plumbing (4075)
0
Final - Building (4050)
Approved
Approved
Approved
By
Date
By
Date
By
Date
Rough Electrical
Approved
FFinal
Electrical
Approved
Right of Way
Approved
By
Date
By
Date
By
Date
t
UNSPECTOR
AREA AND TYPE OF INSPECTIO
)tom
o '�
Z91 go,
AtJ
L-4 -tom
5
t
C a �
I�
3.0 DISCUSSION
3.1 Wetlands D & E
i�
U
Based on that review and after several follow up discussions with the City of Federal Way
Planning Department and wetland and shoreline staff at the Washington Department of
Ecology (ECOLOGY) it was concluded that the Federal Way shoreline regulations does
not have language to utilize the Ecology Wetland Rating System for Western Washington
for wetlands associated with shorelines. At this point in time wetland categories
associated with shorelines are based solely on FWRC 19.175.020 and FWRC 15.10.250.
These two shoreline codes do not allow for a "dual rating" of a wetland that has a Category
I bog component incorporated within a Category 11 or III forested or scrub/shrub wetland.
For this reason the presence of the identified bog component, identified as Wetland E in
the EnCo wetland delineation is now mapped as part of Wetland D and must be rated as a
Category 1 wetland with a 200 foot wide standard shoreline wetland buffer. Wetland E is
now identified as a "bog component" of Wetland D as shown on the attached updated
wetland exhibit (FIGURE 5 — 2014 (Amended 10.12.15) and in TABLE 11 — WETAND &
BUFFER CHARACTERISTICS for Wetland D.
3.2 Wetlands A, B & C
A question was raised by the City of Federal Way whether Wetlands A, B, and C meet the
recognized criteria to be considered as a wetland mosaic. Wetland mosaics are defined in
the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:
Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0). In general, wetland mosaics
are areas of interspersed wetland and upland that lay over the landscape in a mosaic
pattern and are too closely associated to be easily delineated individually. The wetlands in
question (Wetlands A, B, and C) are individually distinguishable, not closely associated
pursuant to the regulatory guidance, and do not meet the "mosaic" definition. Perteet
concurred with the boundaries, ratings, and buffers of Wetlands A, B, and C as presented
in the EnCo report.
3.3 Depression Landform Located North of Wetland C
As part of the wetland review process Perteet Inc. requested EnCo to assess a
depressional landform that is located about 75 feet north of northern edge of Wetland C.
One test plot was assessed (Test Plot 13) by EnCo on May 6, 2015 (FIGURE 5 — 2014
(Amended 10.12.15). This test plot was determined not to be a wetland as presented in
the EnCo report dated May 11, 2015 (Attachment). This conclusion was supported by
Perteet, Inc. in their Memorandum submitted to the City of Federal array, dated May 21,
2015.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
1. Wetland D is a Category I wetland with a 200 foot wide standard shoreline wetland
buffer. Wetland E is now identified as a "bog component' of Wetland D.
Site Assessment • Wetland • Remediation • Habitat
2
0
O
L
-ZZ
r -
o U
l v w -0
O -v N
dtiOF�::D'S
:ww
0
0
Q
.13
G 7
O rn
M
W >;
ca
i
ep
N
LL
Y
K
Z �
a o
•
U
2. The boundaries, ratings, and buffers of Wetlands A, B, and C remain as presented
in the EnCo report.
3. Test Plot 13 was determined not to be a wetland.
Sincerely,
Jonathan M. Kemp
President, EnCo Environmental Corporation, P.W.S. # 2110
Site Assessment . Wetland • Remediation • Habitat
3
Iowa
U-j
LLI
7,
0
LL,
Lr)
Lij
Lu
0
L
M
CO O U
"r Lu o z -a
0 F—CL
c� —
O � N
d LCL O
0
N
Q1
CL
_ C
= O
r
e`0
jot
w
e 40
�
QC
0
L
M
CO O U
"r Lu o z -a
0 F—CL
c� —
O � N
d LCL O
0
N
Q1
CL
_ C
= O
e`0
a
w
d
�
QC
O1
M
T
t0
t6
67
N
L.L
Y
X
Z
�
W tp
Lo
L 0
Qi
� Q1
m Z
O a)
L m
r ;y
Q � Q
a o
X
Lli�co
Lo O L9
r
Q
P--
0
Na
-0O Z U
EZ cy
Z O C
CD
cs G) C E
�3 O
o
70
_ w
LU ccs
70� 0W
�7- a
> �5
tc
T CU
a>
0O LLI
(1) 0
LL X -
j> O
Lo
Q L
CU 0
C1i L X
LL �'-''w
m Lo
\1 Kl W
c v
z
®
U
O �,
h
m
Z
U® n
W
U)!L
LL =3%
Z3 fA
'O CS
N �
c6 N
- .g a
U3 L
��
N 47�
ym
.-0
2�� ��
{W3 T
tOU4
ti N
a1 a >
LL
O
in
U.
H t5
L
'� U Q
-0
tit O m c
LL ' -
tY
LL
M
E
Z
J Qk C:
R", m
Q w Z O
0 0.'S
Q
0
:I: Lam
yc�� U
c
�ww
tY�
>ai
7
.
ato
m�,- a
u.immoD
t3.m
N
p�j
U
U
G
O Z O
4T
a, N
O v
Z
'J
m j 4
a ..
Lo
p
Z c
Ua
U m A
U A
�'
ca 4)Q
!n c C
h
C?
L 12i
G+i
(n U
h
cg
O •> Gc
�^
C_
N
h
W
�� U
z
Q
y g 45
C O O i Z
W CO
M
t
z
N
a Q C> CL
< (nn y ..
z� h
U
D
Ci
�u7
�"-�
a
O u .r c sn
�� a a
_ C C 3:.2
W Q h
0
W e
L
� � �! fffi ct �
+^' .� t4 R +� '
W I U) ts3
U
� a
�=
0V)_5E
oma
Q
!n> z8 -
-WU
LU o
t -i W
Lr
m W
i
to O
W
in
FF- LLL
D
O Ti
Z
<i
i (n
CL O
®e e
w
c '=
®
Z
6, c'j -j
o >,
Q-
Q
U
c IC < J
O U 0_
W a °'
H
WLO
LLL
i� tli
iLUl COU m
U W U to
3:
s
CV
u
ON
9
_
U
C
h
Q
G7
Q
"" LL
CL
L7 �.�
t7
y Q
NFA
3
LL^
CL
N O
a.+
U N>
1T3 tiJ
'O C,5 m
U
LL
.� N RS N
O U' N
tots tnz
U�xs tn7h0
j:
0)fz0
z m
LL
4
�
N
Ui
h C
JQ
cD
g�
c7
O
!Q—
r to ao
C
r
t h 7
0
N
41
_O
LU
F-
O
LO
LIJ W
4, CL
y, tZ
Z
Q
�*
�s v ii
tl
o
-4
W
LLJ
Lo
L 0
Qi
� Q1
m Z
O a)
L m
r ;y
Q � Q
a o
X
Lli�co
Lo O L9
r
Q
P--
0
Na
-0O Z U
EZ cy
Z O C
CD
cs G) C E
�3 O
o
70
_ w
LU ccs
70� 0W
�7- a
> �5
tc
T CU
a>
0O LLI
(1) 0
LL X -
j> O
Lo
Q L
CU 0
C1i L X
LL �'-''w
m Lo
\1 Kl W
31
R
a
d
LL
Y
x
o u,
z�
ao
0
0
r
U
v w
o
o
Sa
aLL. 0�f�
# i
31
R
a
d
LL
Y
x
o u,
z�
ao
0
0
r
U
v w
o
o
Sa
aLL. 0�f�
31
R
a
d
LL
Y
x
o u,
z�
ao
City of Federal Way '
Community & Econ. Dev. Services
33325 8th Ave S
Federal Way, WA 98003
Ph: (253) 835-2607 Fax: (253) 835-2609
Project Name: BARCELO HOMES LOT 4
Project Address: 3811 S 326TH ST
Building - Single Yaw-ily
Permit #: 15 -103160 -00 -SF
Inspection Request Line: (253) 835-3050
Parcel Number: 152104 9022
Project Description: NEW - Construction of a new 3740 square foot, 2 -story residence with 50 sqft covered
entry, 588 sqft deck, and a 973 sqft attached garage. *** Proposed selling price: $536,280, 6
bedrooms ***
Owner
Applicant
Contractor
Lende
BARCELO HOMES INC.
JONATHAN LEMONS
BARCELO HOMES INC
OWNER IS LENDER
PO BOX 1733
LEMONS ARCHITECTURE PLLC
BARCEHI869J9 (4/29/18)
50
AUBURN WA 98071-1733
600 1ST AVE SUITE 622
PO BOX 1733
Residence (1 or 2
1
SEATTLE WA 98104
AUBURN WA 98071
Census Category: 101 - New Single Family House
Includes:
#1 #2 43 #4
Occupancy Class:
R-3
Construction Type:
Type V - B
Occupancy Load:
V - B
Floor Areas . ft.
3,740 0 1 0 0
Additional Permit Information
New / Additional Sq. Feet - 1 st Floor ....................
2398
New / Additional Sq. Feet - 3rd Floor....................0
New / Additional Sq. Feet - Basement...................0
No
Occupancy # 1 - Construction Type ........................Type
V - B
New / Additional Sq. Feet - Garage .......................973
Fireplace Inserts............................. 2
Occupancy # 1 - Class.............................................R-3
50
Plumbing to be Included?.......................................Yes
5351
Occupancy #I - Use ...............................................
Residence (1 or 2
1
family)
New / Additional Sq. Feet - 2nd Floor...................1342
Occupancy # I - Area (Sq. Feet).............................3740
BasicPlan?...........................................................
No
New / Additional Sq. Feet - Deck ..........................588
Fans................................................
Mechanical to be Included?....................................Yes
Fireplace Inserts............................. 2
New / Additional Sq. Feet - Other ..........................
50
New / Additional Sq. Feet - Total ..........................
5351
CONDITIONS:
An automatic fire sprinkler system is required. No framing inspection until the sprinkler system is installed
and approved.
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY a bond must be put in place for frontage improvements. See ROW Modification
16 -103261 -SM letter dated 7/26/16. Ann D.
Mechanical Fixtures
Ducting ...........................................
1
Fans................................................
9
Fireplace Inserts............................. 2
Furnaces .........................................
1
Gas Piping ......................................
1
Gas Pipe Outlets............................. 5
Hot Water Tanks ............................
1
Plumbing Fixtures
Bathtubs.........................................
4
Dishwashers...................................
2
Drains............................................. 3
Lavatories .......................................
7
Sinks...............................................
3
Water Closets................................. 5
Hose Bibbs.....................................
3
CONDITIONS:
An automatic fire sprinkler system is required. No framing inspection until the sprinkler system is installed
and approved.
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY a bond must be put in place for frontage improvements. See ROW Modification
16 -103261 -SM letter dated 7/26/16. Ann D.
_ A a OL PERMIT EXPIRES Saturday, February 4, 201771
Perfffl' fg ed Mf Mdhtfili, August 8, 2016 "
1 c
I hereby certify that the above information is correct and that the construction on the above described property and
the occupancy and the use will be in a rdance with the laws, rules and regulations of the State of Washington
and the City ederal Way.
Owner or agent: Date:
City of Federal Way
Certificate of Occupancy
This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 110.2 of the International Building Code certifying that
at the time of issuance, this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the City regulating building
construction or use. This certificate is valid ONLY when endorsed by City staff.
Tenant Name: BARCELO HOMES LOT 4
Address: 3811 S 326TH ST
Permit #: 15 -103760 -00 -SF
Includes:
#1 #2 #3 #4
Occupancy Class:
R-3
Construction Type:
Type V - B
Occupancy Load:
Floor Area (sq. ft.) 1
3,740 0 0 0
Owner Name: BARCELO HOMES INC.
Owner Address: PO BOX 1733
AUBURN WA 98071-1733
Building
Date
The priority focus in the review and inspection made by the City prior to issuance of this Certificate was on those matters which
experience has shown most severly affect the health and safety of the general public. Although the City has made as complete a
review and inspection as is reasonably possible (within budgetary time and personnel limitations), the City neither guarantees nor
warrants to the owner / occupant or to any other person that this Certificate evidences strict compliance with each and every
ordinance or regulation of the City or the State of Washington affecting the construction or use of said structure or the land upon
which itis situated. Such compliance is the responsibility of the owner and/or occupant of the premises.
THIS CARD IS TO REMAIN UV -SIT
CITY Or Construction Inspection Record
Federal Way INSPECTION REQUESTS: (253) 835-3050
PERMIT #: 15 -103760 -00 -SF Address: 3811 S 326TH ST
Project: BARCELO HOMES INC. FEDERAL WAY, WA
Scheduled inspections may be failed if this card is not on-site. DO NOT LOSE THIS CARD. Inspections are listed as close to sequential order as
possible (read left to right, top to bottom). Please schedule inspections as appropriate. Work must not be covered until it is approved. Check with your
inspector if you are unsure about any of the inspections or the inspection sequence. On-going inspections are logged on the back of this card.
SWM Precon Site Mtg (4400)
❑
Initial Erosion Control (4365)
❑
Footings/Setback (4110)
By
Approved
By
To be done prior to breaking ground
By
Approved to place concrete
By
Date
By
Date
By
J Date
Foundation Wall (4115)
❑
Drainage/Downspout (4040)
E:]
Plumbing Groundwork (4190)
By
Approved to place concrete
By
Approved to backfill
By
Approved to cover
By
Date ��. „
By
Date
By C-
.\ Date
Slab/Concrete Floor (4255)
❑
Underfloor Framing (4285)
El
Floor Sheathing (4105)
Approved to place concrete
Approved to sheath floor
Approved to install flooring
By
Date
By
Date 1 w` l t
By
_ Date
Shear Walls (4245)
Roof Sheathing (4220)
❑
Rough Plumbing (4230)
Approved to install siding
Approved to install roofing
Approved
By
Date
By
L_ I.L_ Date 1 _
L
By
Date `1 Ir 11
Mechanical Rough -in (4165)El
Gas Piping (4125)
E]
Fire/Draft Stops (4095)
Approved
Approved to release test
Approved
By
WV4 Date
By
Date
By
KV5Date '1 l lP! I v1
Interim Erosion Control (4370)
Prior to scheduling a Framing inspection;
Framing (4120)
Approved
Electrical, Plumbing & Mechanical Rough -in and
Approved to insulate
By
Date
Fire/Draft Stop inspections must be signed -off and
By
n Date
�t 1
approved. IBC 109.3.4
`
rTw
Insulation (4150)
❑ Gypsum Wallboard Nailing (4130)
E]
Final Erosion Control (4375)
Approved to install wallboard
Approved to install mud & tape
Approve
By
r) Date B 1 � �
By
Date
By
Date
Final - Mechanical (4065)
Final - Plumbing (4075)
E:]
Final - Building (4050)
Approved
Approved
Approved
By
i Date -�
By
44J Date 4,7
By
j Date 5
Rough Electrical
Approved
1:1Approved
Final Electrical
1:1Approved
Right of Way
By
Date
By
Date
By
Date
Andrew,
07/24/2017
We reviewed the information you provided regarding deviations from the original plans.
- HUC46 Hangers are as adequate substitute for EPC Post Cap Hangers for the
header to post connection.
- (3) 2x6" studs alone are not adequate for the load that the PSL post was designed
for, as they would buckle under the load. Please look at the sketch in the attachment
for a possible upgrade. It shows the nailing for the sheathing, blockings to prevent
buckling, and a strap at the top to bridge the gap in the top plates.
- The shear panels at the western grid are still adequate with the southern panel no
longer in place, as the loads in this grid are relatively low.
- See attachment for the dowel connection between the continuous footing and the
wider footing under the beam in the kitchen area.
Sincerely,
Roland Heiniisch, P.E.
tecinstruct LLC
ZD
Lr
Ofi lh� / a
tecinstruct LLC
6830 NE Bothell Way
Suite C, PMB 181
Kenmore, WA 98028
(206) 553-9076
rheimisch@yahoo-com
Barcelo Homes
www.tecinstruct.com
Andrew Movchan
32505 138th Place SE
Auburn, WA 98092
Engineering for New SFR
or -
AIR
Engineering
Rainbow Trout, 32605 39th Ave S
Andrew,
07/24/2017
We reviewed the information you provided regarding deviations from the original plans.
- HUC46 Hangers are as adequate substitute for EPC Post Cap Hangers for the
header to post connection.
- (3) 2x6" studs alone are not adequate for the load that the PSL post was designed
for, as they would buckle under the load. Please look at the sketch in the attachment
for a possible upgrade. It shows the nailing for the sheathing, blockings to prevent
buckling, and a strap at the top to bridge the gap in the top plates.
- The shear panels at the western grid are still adequate with the southern panel no
longer in place, as the loads in this grid are relatively low.
- See attachment for the dowel connection between the continuous footing and the
wider footing under the beam in the kitchen area.
Sincerely,
Roland Heiniisch, P.E.
tecinstruct LLC
ZD
Lr
Ofi lh� / a
CITY 011 PER;#jjrI\*jjPLICATION
Federal Way
�j JUL 2 9 2015 n
PERMIT NUMBER ` Cm OF pERAL WAY —` Z. �rJ
— CET DATE _-- -
-
SITE ADDRESS --_-- - - ----
� (y� 46C SUITE /UNIT Y -
20-
- - --- -
P OJECT VALUATION ZONING I ASSESSOR'S TAX/PARCEL it
' TYPE OF PERMIT 11011,14NC ❑ PLUMBING ❑ MECHANICAL U DRKIOUTION ❑ ENGINEERING ❑ 111RF PREVENTKIN
NAME OF PROJECTAtnvt>J--��
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Detailed description of work to
be included on this permit only
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME ___ ..
;5firrAv Y"/iLz IAC,
PRIMARY PHONE
253, 332, �SO'L
hAUXIO_ ADDRs=cc
f: s� €„� i i' 4 ✓
E ll�_ _ .�
ItADn arLCFrEft A
CITY A s- T/!TE ZIP
253.332. gLZ
NAME
L rC.Qb DMMP� �nC..
MAMInG ADDRESS -7
T3��
CONTRACTOR
���}=vrn STATE
Z�i�a� t
F.�
a\
W A STA'£ CONTRACTOIYS LICENSE f ENPUtATIOR DATE
NAME r w � � . U � �
l/
FEDERAL W A4 SIISUMS+S LICERSE s
p RIMIARY PHONE
2 h 3Cbr� 5 Z
APPLICANT
MAILING ADDRESSL
(�t?O 1`'-r-_ -AYE_} . �ur1� (�2.�
-
,on LeMc�s�rCiir}�ctthg
CITY P
+ -
FAX
PROJECT CONTACT
NAME
,n( IYI C D !i -�
PRIMARY PHONE
C 3DI�, S9G>Z
(The individual to receive and ,
respond to all correspondence
MAILVIG ADDRESS ��
C i�— 11 i1. , f o
p► oiuW(e
CITY�
STATE ZD: A w R
GITC� U
FAX ' _
concerning this application) !
—_ -- - -_.
PROJECT FINANCING
NA!!E
-
OWNER -FINANCED
koquired value uj w • 000 or mon'
(Rett' t o J r'. OQS)
MAILING ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP
PHONE
I certify under penalty of perjury that I am the property owner or author•tr<d agent of the property owner. I certify that to the best
of my knowledge, the information submitted in support of this permit application is true and correct. I certify that I will comply with
all applicable City of Federal Way regulations pertaining to the work authorized by the issuance of a permit. I understand that the
issuance of this permit does not remove the owner's responsibility for compliance with local, state, or federal taws regulating
construction or environmental laws.
t further agree to hold harmless he Ci of Federal Way as to any claim (including costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees incurred in
the investigation and defr
ta' , which may be made by any person, including the undersigned, and filed against the city,
but only where such clat reliance of the city, including its officers and employees, upon the accuracy of the
information supplied to tt application.
SIGNATURE: _DATE _X S
PRINT NAME:
Bulletin # 100 — January 1.2013 Page 1 of 3 kA1 landouts\Peni it Application
FM
MECHANICAL PERMIT
Indicate how many of each
AIR HANDLING UNITS
AIR CONDITIONER
BOILERS
COMPRESSORS
DUCTING
VALUE OF MECHANICAL WORK
$ h , Toy
to be installed or relocated as part of this project. Do not include existing fixtures to remain.
FANS GAS PIPE OUTLETS OTHER (Describe)
FIREPLACE INSERTS HOODS (commarciaq
FURNACES �_ HOT WATER TANKS (Gas)
GAS LOG SETS REFRIGERATION SYST
GAS PIPING WOODSTOVES
PLUMBING PERMITC)�
AREA DESCRIPTION
VALUE OF PLUMBING WORK
Indicate how many of each type of fixture to be installed or relocated as part of this project. Do not include existingjbLtures to remain.
BATHTUBS (or Tub/shower combo) LAYS (Hand sinks) �_ TOILETS WATER PIPING
L DISHWASHERS RAINWATER SYSTEMS URINALS OTHER (Describe)
_ DRAINS SHOWERS VACUUM BREAKERS
DRINKING FOUNTAINS ^ SINKS witch—/utility) WATER HEATERS (mectric)
.� HOSE BIBBS SUMPS = WASHING MACHINES TOTAL FIXTURES
# of
Stories
Additional Information
NEW BUILDINO
GENERAL INFORMATION
CRITICAL ARE" ON PROPS ?
sr►�el+ t,. )�,
WATER PURVEYOR
(,Ai*vw �grc�2�o
ADDITION
SEWER PURVEYOR
( AwertAfCAo
EXISTING FIRE SPRIN R SYSTEM?
❑ Yesx No
VALUE OF E]QSTING IMPROVEMENTS
$
EXISTING/PREVIOUS USE
�� CAe '
LOT SIZE (In Squaw Feet) f C
2 4a (ice ✓✓
PROPOSED FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM?
❑ Yes X No
COMMERCIAL - REMODEUTENANT IMPROVEMENTS
AREA DESCRIPTION
Area
in Square Feet
RESIDENTIAL - NEW OR ADDITION
Construction
Type
# of
Stories
AREA DESCRIPTION (in aquare feet)
EXISTING
PROPOSED
I TOTAL
FOR OFFICE USE
BASEMENT
TENANT AREA ONLY
................ -..... ---
------.... _... _............................................................................
FIRST FLOOR (or Mobile Home)
PROJECT AREA ONLY
�'2>1 g
---... .....................
-----...................... _.... _........ _.-...................
SECOND FLOOR
r-
' 3%`
102 2
...........
--------... -.................... --- _... _................... _... ...
COVERED ENTRY lin
✓
15o
J�
_.__......._....._
.
DECK
... - .......... _.._......_.__
_..-- —--------......... _... __..............................
GARAGE X, CARPORT ❑
__.._...._........................
_......
OTHER (describe)
Area Totals
EC) 6
PROPOSED
5315
TOTAL
535
**JWW HOAMs ONLY**
ESTIMATED SELLING PRICE $ 3q 0 1 %o
I # OF BEDROOMS
COMMERCIAL - NEW/ADDITION
AREA DESCRIPTION
Area
in Square Feet
Occupancy Group(s)
Construction
Type
# of
Stories
Additional Information
NEW BUILDINO
ADDITION
COMMERCIAL - REMODEUTENANT IMPROVEMENTS
AREA DESCRIPTION
Area
in Square Feet
Occupancy Groups)
Construction
Type
# of
Stories
Additional Information
TOTAL BUILDING
TENANT AREA ONLY
PROJECT AREA ONLY
Bulletin #100 — January 1, 2013 Page 2 of 3 kAHandoutsTernut Application
d
'11
�..�� Lemons Architecture PLLC RESUBMITTED
MAY 0 9 2016
Project Address: 32605 39' Ave S CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Permit Number: 15 -103760 -00 -SF CDS
Reviewer: Becky Chaplin
Correction Responses
REGULATED WETLAND BUFFER
As you are aware, this permit application was submitted based on a prior wetland/wetland buffer
delineation that was not approved by the City. As part of the Short Plat Application (File #15-1 -U D
0314 I -SU), the city is working with Beyler Consulting LLC and EnCo Environmental Corporation C G o
to finalize the lot layout of the subdivision and delineation boundaries of Wetland D/E. Please aF M M
revise the site plan to depict a 200' buffer around the Category I Wetland. In addition, provide a n �'
revised wetland report. Also, please provide an updated short plat drawing depicting the
proposed layout of al I the lots. _
It is my understanding, based on conversations with the applicant's wetland biologist, Jonathan v 77
Kemp, EnCo, that there will be no intrusions into the wetland buffer. Please revise the site plan ° n ::E
to show the new location of the residence, with all improvements outside the wetland buffer o � T
area. O
Please note: if there are any intrusions into the wetland buffer a separate land use review
process will be required before the building permit can be issued.
'm
Response: Thank -you, please see the revised plan set to find an updated short
plat drawing and a revised wetland report attached. There will be no intrusion into 0
the category I wetlands as noted. Please see the 200' buffer depicted in the site h;
plan and civil drawings.
BUJLDING HEIGHT
More information is needed to confirm if the building height meets the 30 -foot above average
building elevation (AABE) maximum height limit. Building height is calculated based on the
average building elevation, which is calculated by finding the average elevation for each building
facade (the average must be calculated from the highest and lowest existing or proposed
elevations, whichever is lowest, and the average can be no greater than five feet higher than the
lowest elevation of that facade.) Add up all the average elevations and divide by the number of
building facades to get the average building elevation around the house. Please identify both
the existing grade and proposed finished grades around the house on the site plan.
Lemons Architecture PLLC 98 Yesler Way. Seattle, WA 98104
206.306.5952 1 Contact an Lemon sArchitecture.com I www.LemonsArchitecture.com
Response: Please see the 30 -foot above average building elevation calculation on
GOA. The existing and proposed grades are shown in the elevations located on
A3.0 — A3.3, thank -you.
LOT COVERAGE
Please provide the lot coverage calculation based on the lot size after being subdivided. Per
FWRC 19.200.010, maximum lot coverage is 60% in the RS7.2 zoning district.
Response: Please see that the lot coverage calculation has been added on sheet
G0.4, thank -you.
TREE AND VEGETATION RETENTION
It appears the site will have sufficient tree canopy coverage. However, please identify the
number of tree units retained and/or replaced per FWRC 19. 120.130. The minimum
requirement is 25 tree units per acre. The number of tree units is calculated by multiplying the
gross site acreage, minus any regulated critical areas, by the required tree density. Please
provide the tree unit density for the site based on the lot size after being subdivided.
Please depict the tree unit calculation on the site plan. Show tree retention fencing around
retained trees in close proximity to construction activity pursuant to FWRC 19.120. 160.
Response: Please find the tree and vegetation calculation added to G0.3. The
revised short plat shows which of the existing trees are to be kept and that tree
and vegetation protection should be installed during construction. The site plan
shows the new trees that will be planted, thank -you.
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT
As proposed, the residence has what appears to be two separate living areas with separate
access; a main living area on the first floor and a separate smaller unit above the garage. There
is potential for the unit above the garage to be considered an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU);
however, as depicted it would not meet the size limitations for an ADU per FWRC 19.200.180.
It is my understanding that the second living area will be exclusively for visitors and family
members of the home owner. At no time will the unit be used as a separate rental unit. The door
separating the main living area to the upstairs must be removed. The door allows the upstairs
unit to be separated from the main living area creating a separate ADU. Please make a note on
the site plan to this effect and adjust the floor plan accordingly.
Response: Please see the revised plan set to find that the door has been removed.
A note has also been added that the space is not to be used as separate ADU at
any time, thank -you.
Lemons Architecture PLL`, 98 Yesler Way. Seattle, WA 98104
206.306.5952 1 ContactC(DLemonsArchitecture con_ www_L,emonsArchitecture.com
AI
C
D
PROJECT INFORMATION SITE NOTES
.DBE.e.aamAwa„ wa D6A6, DD EY o�
ab a , ALDT (IONS
PAacE- ,szl�a9ozz A ODAI coriAvnc rorigosnv4Fn cis1111TECAOR RIGDnn� AS NOT ElANN
LEGAL OEsce RIN— ,H ...
wA
s n oWES:c
STAR Fao sa NO1111WITTIDUARTIR OF -J101 lE AND o eco e-s.a;3 Aral u«.1 v cA c> cci., D F au6 so o'noNel
IOITI
I F E 0
NL C' pry P FlOv ooC soN EXfCN50Y s AFl ZFA4 0 c9 oc BED, ,OU
( S o COLD BNONiI
0 LEFT " (, KNOWN AS AAUA
I.A C'S hN UN 4Y' )ItD: Pi LA, S I OI.N'fY OP KNG, STATFD WASH NGI'OY,O JS'SOI 0 Eh"O TO
ARIAS
SOF)I OF RE '. oCONSTRUCTIOIN
SITE APEA. 2+/,2A .,f BE N6.0�. .AOC .O ha A60UiS pE OrD SP UCON..TgUCTiONREOEITA
1a
X
1 Architectural Site Plan
'�._RED 0.
C A zs'111 as -n" ase 7"
2 �3 5..
TO,— -n-t— PLLC
6001,,Avo SNS, 622
,FAWB WA 98104
2063065962
Le noneAraM1'ieciure.00m
d o
o 0
MEL,�
(1)CcU)¢
O3
O Q 7
C
U 0 Cl)ED
C
O O fCt
ED
i
QrrML
JOB NUN
Lis -0:
w
Al;
,s ti,